‘The Universe is a an organism with a mind called Logos.’
Plato. On i-logic Time§pace organisms.
‘Simplicity is Genius’. ‘Universe is simple but not malicious’.
Leonardo, Einstein, 2 simple geniuses
‘The Universe is an ∆±¡nfinite fractal supœrganism of 5 Ðimotions of time§paces’.
l§. Webmaster. Philosopher of Science, Chair of Duality at ISSS
I. 5D³ Universe: The five dimensional motions of time space organisms.
II. The physical time space organism, its galactic scale.
III. The human time space organism, its social scales.
IV. ¬Æ Mind languages & Sciences. Upgrading the ‘Humind’.
RELATIONAL SPACE-TIME: 5TH DIMENSION OF INFORMATION & EVOLUTION
‘Leibniz was right there are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from scratch’ Einstein, on the tasks achieved in this blog.
The reader would be surprised to learn that scientists are fully aware their first principles, an absolute single time clock for the entire Universe and a continuous single space are ‘false’ conventions, useful to measure reality with ‘human artifacts’ but the Universe HAS infinite time clocks – all cyclical motions by definition describe a time clock – and broken ‘vital spaces’ (all membranes and cyclical clocks by definition break space into inner and outer regions), which are the main ‘components of beings’.
This is the case since quantum physics show ‘vacuum space’ holds energy and it is broken into quanta, and relativity showed there are infinite time clocks with different speeds in the Universe.
And yet what should have come next, a thorough investigation on how a world of infinite time clocks and broken spaces is was such a difficult task as it had to come to the very beginning of science that as Einstein put it, nobody dared to do it, and so the routines of traditional scientific thought continue, and we still use a single time-clock tuned to the second and a single rod of distance in space, the c-speed of light or the meter for more pedestrian purposes.
What we do in this blog is exactly what Einstein asked for: take the concept of a Universe made of relational space-time beings, forwarded by Leibniz to its ultimate consequences. And the result is a Universe as it is SO DIFFERENT from the one you are told to believe in, as the upgrading of quantum and relativity was in its depiction of physical space or the upgrading of Darwin in his description of biological time, or Aristotle in his description of the causal logic of those time systems.
Why this is NOT been done before, as science has been content merely with putting ‘parches’ to reality has to do with the mentioned routines of knowledge, expressed also by Mr. Planck. So you will have to suspend your beliefs for a while if you want to go ahead and understand better the Universe.
The scalar superorganisms of the Universe in a nutshell.
In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, with respect to which particles move. Space and time are a stage. Like actors on that stage, particles move, exert forces onto each other and generally act out the drama of dynamics, while the stage itself does not change. This is sketched in the illustration. There, we see objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, but there is also a fixed background structure, space, which is just as real, pictured here as a lattice of intersecting lines. Newton’s view of the universe is manifestly background dependent – whether or not a particle is moving or at rest is determined in relation to Newton’s absolute space and time – the plenum/body of God, which of course must be immortal and last for ever, graphed ‘obviously’ to make it easier for the chosen to understand.
A relational world without spatial background
But even in Newton’s day, there were philosophers like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz who took a different stance. In modern parlance, theirs is a relationist point of view. For a relationist, there is no background of absolute space and time. The fundamental properties of the elementary entities consist entirely in relationships between those elementary entities. Time is nothing but changes in these relationships, and consists of nothing but the ordering of these changes. In the relationist version of the above illustration, only the objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, are real. The lattice has no independent existence. Even without the lattice, it does make sense to talk about the distance between two given objects. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity. Physicists intent on describing our universe cannot just assume a given geometry. Instead, geometry is something that needs to be determined by solving certain equations that include all the effects of matter and energy.
But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe.
But space and time do exist.
It is then necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical cartesian artefact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar (a. ∆§) Space, and cyclical discontinuous time (ab.ð, Ð) who ‘lives’… in worldcycles (no longer worldlines) of exist¡ence (as species who follow the common laws of all stiences of space and time).
This idea is so simple, so beautiful, that if you grasp it and agree, I invite you to tell to all others who wonder to wander this web, now that I have completed a fairly understandable version, a decade after Mr. Wheeler’s death, a century after Mr. Einstein’s previous paradigm, a millennium after the invention of the simplex mechanical clock… WHICH DEFORMED our vision of the infinite clocks of the universe of space-time.
So the essential change of paradigm from absolute spacetime to relational spacetime is simple and everything else follows from it: we are made of vital spaces that last a finite time ‘world cycle’ of existence, and so the study of the vital organic spaces, which we are and the laws of its world cycles of time duration, is what science is all about.
What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. It is a mathematical artifact, a pen and paper ‘cartesian graph’ drawing, physicists used to map out reality and do calculations but it does NOT exist in reality. Do you see a Cartesian graph in the background of the vital spaces occupied by beings? No. Physicists have probe down to the scale of strings and they have never found the ‘lines’ of the lineal time and cartesian space, they draw in their papers ts, ts… So space must be the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings. And they have never found an ‘immortal being’ which would not follow a ‘world cycle’ of life and death…
All is generated in a point of past and dies in a point of future. So the infinite line of single time of the Cartesian graph is missing. ts, ts…
Hence the need to change paradigm from an abstract single space-time continuous background, which Newton merely took from the abstract mathematical Cartesian Plane that became in his ‘delirium tremens’ the ‘Plenum=body of Yahveh’ in which we all exist (: the dependent background against which all motions were measured, into what physicists without better understanding call a background independent theory of science – meaning no background at all).
Let us start then with a very brief conceptualization on how the Universe looks when we ad a new dimension of internal time=change or arrow of in-form-ation, of change in form, or ‘morphogenesis’, to the arrow of external time=change or translation in space, of loco-motion and entropy, the one one studied by Physicists.
A UNIVERSE MADE OF TOPOLOGIC SPACE BEINGS…
The devil is in the details so the first obvious question we must answer is what MEANS in REAL terms, the fact that all what exists is MADE OF SPATIAL topologies and TEMPORAL ages, of Space and Time? The answer is fascinating, as there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies. And so the fact that we are made of space means ultimately we are made of 3 type of organic topologies:
The 3 only topologies of all systems of Nature. Internal ‘bidimensional’ and external classic dimensions.
The insight that there are only 3 topologies in 4 and 5D nature is the key mathematical finding to fully account for topological evolution, the ternary nature of all systems and its functions and physiological networks, resolved NOT through intelligent design but through the limiting fact that there are only 3 topologies in space in the Universe. So by force al systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the next graphs:
So this is the second ternary spatial element of reality:
|-moving limbs/potentials x O-head/particles = Ø-body waves
This is the simplest expression of the FRACTAL GENERATOR of space-time beings, as all of them will display those ternary topologies.
Let us start with a visual, topologic analysis of the dimensions of space-time, both internally (first graph) and externally (second graph):
Internal dimensions are topologic, bidimensional varieties: spheres of maximal in-form-ation, planes of maximal motion/distance, and hyperbolic body/waves of maximal reproduction.
Yet those beings are in an external larger ‘∆+1’ world; and there we can describe its relative forms-functions in terms of the classic ‘external dimensions’.
Then we talk of the 3 simplest lineal dimensions, which are height, the obvious dimension of information, from heads to antennae, as the highest advantage point of view allows more ‘perception of information’. So we find that spherical ‘informative particle/ heads’ are always in the dimension of height.
Length is the obvious dimension of motion. So we observe that systems move ‘ahead’, ‘forwards’ in the length dimension. And finally ‘width’, the ‘product of both’ dimensions (electromagnetic rule) IS the dimension of ‘reproduction’ of waves, and cells. So even women have ‘wider’ hips.
Moreover when we observe our ‘real external space-time’ which is made of light, those 3 perpendicular dimensions correspond to the ‘functions’ of the light ‘spacetime organism’: c-speed moves ahead the wave-state of the light beam; the electric informative field is on the height dimension, the magnetic, energetic field is wide.
In the graph the Euclidean world is caused by the 3 perpendicular arrows of light space-time to which we add the social colors. 2 more elements are needed to define our human space-time, first the organic relationships between our electronic eyes that feed on light, and the properties of information – as information is perceived in stillness, in an stop and go motion, similar to that of a film – so electrons go and move as waves, stop and feed and perceive light as particles, entangling its distances with other electrons in ‘fixed’ distances. Hence c-speed is always constant, our rod of space, as relativity proves, without giving the proper i-logic explanation.
THUS both in the external light world, height, length and width have the same functions than the internal, ‘volume’ created by the 3 topological varieties of the Universe: spherical, planar and hyperbolic forms.
So obvious is the fact that our space-time is light space-time, with its specific Euclidean ternary dimensions in which we are immersed, that it amazes me that only philosophers like Kant (our mind-space is euclidean because light is Euclidean) Leonardo and impressionist painters (who paint light space with sfumato or decomposition of colors) had it clear. Once we advance more the mathematical and physical models we shall incorporate into Relativity and quantum physics this feature of reality that explains some of its paradoxes (c-light speed, quantum potentials, etc.)
And so in a single plane of reality, we perceive systems as ensembles of the 3 varieties of space, (to which we soon will add the 2 scalar dimensions of entropic parts, and social wholes).
Moreover as topology is form with motion, topology ARE space-time Dimensions:
So we can build reality with the 3 dimensions of space and its motions in time, we shall calle ÐIMOTIONS or actions of space-time.
In the graph, a first hint to how the 3 ‘vital dimensions of space-time’ ensemble into parts and organic wholes in all physical, biological and social systems; since there are only 3 topological forms (geometries with motion) in the Universe.
So evolutionary topology BECOMES a new key discipline to understand how the forms of species evolve as ensembles of the 3 ‘form of space=functions of time=topological varieties of space-time in the Universe as lineal maximal motions-functions in limbs/potentials and maximal informative storages in spherical heads/particles.
Indeed, all what you see are forms of space with motion in time that combine into the infinite energy beings of the Universe.
And while physicists have reached an extraordinary dexterity calculating the motions in space of beings; only when we ad those other type of motions=changes in space-time we understand how they trans-form and evolve through generation into new forms of in-form-ation. This is the basis of the formal model of this blog, the ‘eternal philosophy of science’, we call ‘organicism’, which understands the Universe as a system that reproduces information.
It is its simplest spatial view, which we shall made soon more complex adding it its time-motions-functions and scales generated by the minds that perceive in the singularity a still mapping of the whole with a language that perceives in itself.
So we can generate and mirror all the systems in space, made of ensembles of those 3 adjacent forms/functions we shall call space-time organisms with them.
We shall write THE TERNARY topology also in many ways and make it increasingly complex as we study different dimensions of ‘form’ and ‘motion’, of ‘space’ and ‘time’. But in its simplest mode is the most extraordinary simplex equation of them all: $≈ð; whereas S is the limbic system, T, the particle-head with its clocks of information and ≈ the bodywave that iterates and puts together both.
The full understanding of these 3 parts of the being comes when we consider ‘bidimensional’, topological networks, which will show a correspondence of form and function, as topology has motion, so we talk in fact of 3 topologies of space=form +time=motion that will definer in vital formal and moving terms all entities in existence.
Let us consider then with the simplest possible symbols of Non-Æ Logic (the advanced formalism needed to describe the more complex space and time), a logic equation of the ternary space-time topological forms=functions of all ‘organisms’ of the Universe:
≥: iterative, reproductive, hyperbolic networks that become body waves, as the hyperbola has all the shapes within it to reproduce the whole being.
| ≈: Flat planes of lineal parallel networks of ‘fractal points’ that become limbs/fields of maximal entropic motions as the line/plane is the fastest distance between two points.
O: Informative, implosive ‘neuronal networks that become cyclical spherical particles-heads that process information as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space.
So the simultaneous ensemble of ‘networks of cellular/atomic/organic herds’ into those 3 differentiated functions=forms which therefore extends across to ∆ø and ∆-1 scales, within the ∆+1 world in which the ternary network/system exists is what we call a super organism.
So we write with those symbols fa Generator Equation of T.œs.
$t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) §ð (still mind form or world)
The ginormous quantity of consequences, detailed and laws derived from that simple formula being made of those 3 topologies would fill up when study in its details – all the beings and super organisms of reality and its ternary parts – an entire galactic encyclopedia.
So in this very brief introduction we shall consider onlythe most remarkable consequence in the simplest level of understanding of it – the ternary principles of conservation of physics that correspond to the 3 parts of all systems.
Each of those vital topologies would require an entire post and encyclopedia to fully analyze the marriage of mathematics and organic existence.
Let us now consider the most important of them, the cyclic/spheric form. Its vital function is to process in-form-ation, memorial form. And so it is cyclic, spherical for two reasons: A sphere has maximal volume in minimal space, ensuring the ‘still, informative’ system to process maximal information and disguise with minimal exposure. But most important memorial in-form-ation is cyclical because TO RETURN TO A POINT, THE SHORTEST PATH IS A CYCLE.
So cycles impose their form in all kind of Universal structures which ‘conserve’, ‘memorize’ and reproduce its existence (as in the conserved cycles of energy).
… THAT LAST TIME WORLDCYCLES OF FINITE DURATION
Cyclical time (ab.ð) and its reduction to lineal mechanical time-clocks.
How does a Universe of infinite time clocks of different size and speed relates to the present Universe in which all time clocks are equalized to the mechanical, clocks of metal-information, which were invented in the Middle Ages in Italy, and became the ONLY CLOCK-TIME OF THE UNIVERSE, once elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks).
Let us then start by describing the biggest blunder mankind has committed in the realm of knowledge: to simplify the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs.
Physicists uncoiled time-frequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation…
BUT IN THE PROCESS THEY LOST FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF BEINGS:
-The information ‘stored’ in the ‘form’ and ‘frequency’ of those cycles.
-The understanding of ‘broken vital spacetimes, as each full closed cycle reads reality into an inner and outer region, inside and outside the ‘simple knot’, or geometric definition of a cycle (Jordan’s first knot theorem). So by the mere fact of being in a universe made of infinite repetitive ‘conserved time clocks’, we obtain a broken space-time. Further on because time IS motion, the final substance of reality IS motions in time, and this makes REPRODUCTION, the essence of a fractal a dynamic natural CONSEQUENCE of this first ‘motion-substance’: by the mere fact of repeating a time clock-like cycle INFORMATION REPRODUCES. So there is no mystery to the process of reproduction, as reproduction occurs by MOTION. And so all those elements -repetitive patterns we call laws of science, the existence of broken vital spaces enclosed by angular momentums and moving membranes performing cyclical clocks that store and reproduce information, and the fractal structure of all of it, WHICH ARE THE ESSENTIAL WHYs of reality, became hidden by the simple concept of an absolute lineal ‘humind’ second unit of space-time.
Humanity is still in that primitive concept of a single time.
Einstein just added to that XVI c. equation, V=s/T, (instead of using V= wave length x Frequency), which ELIMINATES the information on the frequency and shape of the steps of the motion.
What physicists mostly do then is the study of ‘open locomotions’, translations in space, through ‘lineal inertia, or scattered, entropic paths’, of objects that move; AND WHAT they care about TO QUANTIFY in terms of ‘RODS OF MEASURE’ that speed of translation in open space, is of course part of time=motion=change studies but far less important than the qualities of ‘closed time paths of frequency and form, of information’ we shall study here.
In the graph, left side, ‘ðime’ clocks that measure the rhythms of reproduction=repetition and change=evolution of the Universe are always cyclical ‘r=evolutions’.
So while humans obviously are aware of the existence of cyclical patterns of nature, because they have abandoned the proper concept of cyclical ðime changes, and its second dimension of form, of information, they cannot fully grasp the fundamental principles of the Universe: its cycles of ðime§pace, its scales of ðime speeds as §pace size (ab. ∆±i), and the ‘mind-mirrors and languages’ of information that allow systems to measure them, and interact with other beings in ðime§pace.
The concept of cyclical ðimes is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all ðime clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical ðimes. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.
Moreover science would not exist if ðimes were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in ðime of patterns of behavior and causality.
All these truths unfortunately are hidden in the ðime equations of modern physics, so good for calculus so bad for interpretation, which need to be translated into cyclical ðime, measured by frequency (T=1/ƒ) and streamlined with a new jargon appropriate for a dual Universe, as opposed to the simplex jargon of classic absolute ðime§pace physics, that lingers in all sciences and drags its understanding.
In the left physical cycles, planetary orbits, which we humans use to measure ðime in all our ‘clocks’, which are also cyclical. People are hardly aware of this fact, since they tend not to use the ‘parameter’ of cyclical ðime, which is ‘frequency’, but its inverse, lineal duration: ƒ=1/t.
The formulae are simplified in this manner. Since ‘frequency ðime’ is discontinuous and so difficult to ‘integrate’. So physicists prefer to uncoil, frequencies into Lineal Time. For example the ‘revolutions per minute of a car wheel’, multiplied by its perimeter give us the ‘distance’: λ x v = S. And besides in this manner we achieve more information, as we get the duration and form of in-form-ation of each cycle (λ) and its frequency, v.
But if you just want to know the total length of along ðime period, you use Lineal Time durations and so you don’t need to sum all those cycles to get the lineal speed: V=s/t.
In the left graph, we can see that all physical systems, and all its ðime cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal ðime – an artifact of measure, and further on equalized all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘ðime clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.
And we shall return to it, when using cyclical time to define and upgrade physical equations, with new insights on its whys, thanks to the ‘inverse arrow of time’ cyclical frequency, ð(ƒ)=1/T-duration.
All what you see around is a tapestry of spatial forms that are moving in time (as motion is relative to the observer you will always be able to find a frame of reference in which the being moves) – nothing else is required to explain it all: ‘forms’, a concept closely related to the scientific concept of in/form/ation and ‘motion’, a concept closely related to the scientific term ‘entropy’. In physics they combine into ‘momentum’ and ‘energy’, and all what you need in physics to describe the Universe is lineal and cyclical momentum and energy (the 3 conserved quantity).
In a more descriptive way in physical and biological systems the moving, lineal parts are forces/limbs, the energy, reproductive part are wave-bodies, the in-form-ative parst, heads/particles.
Forms in space, motions in time and its infinite combinations create the ternary Universe, which humans before so much details hid the forest understood in Eastern cultures: ‘yin-formation and yang-motion create the infinite qi-energy beings’ (Lao tse)
Further on we can reduce reality to a single ‘element’, motion. Since when we observe any ‘form’ in detail particles at ‘smaller’ scales, their forms are also motions, rotary motions and vortices of time.
Form in fact is merely a ‘very fast closed motion’ that seen without detail appears as a solid form. So all particles are closed motions. We shall call a closed ‘motion’, a clock-like ‘time cycle’. So we affirm all in the Universe are ‘formal motions’ tracing in-form-ative time cycles.
Information is stored in those closed ‘forms’ or ‘time cycles. In/form/ations, Forms in action are both the ‘form’ AND frequency ‘bits’ of those time cycles. And so as all what exists are cyclical forms (we shall call them, ‘fractal points’, ab. œ, •) that complete ‘worldcycles of time’, we can really reduce it all to ‘formal motions’, to time cycles.
And as any motion that ‘repeats’ its time cycle is REPRODUCING its form, its information, there is no doubt about our first principle born of the experience that all what we perceive are motions reproducing information as they move in time cycles:
All clocks of time are cyclical motions which break reality into an inner region of vital energy, an angular momentum clock that encloses it and when regular a central singularity which can ‘perceive’ some how a mapping of the Universe that flows through the membrane. So mind, angular momentum and vital energy become the 3 parts of the clock and hence the basic super organism of the Universe.
Let us start then with a very brief conceptualization on how the Universe looks when we ad a new dimension of internal time=change or arrow of in-form-ation, of change in form, or ‘morphogenesis’, to the arrow of external time=change or translation in space, of loco-motion and entropy, the one one studied by Physicists.
The hurdles of the human ego.
I have to bring now, too soon for my taste, a critical assessment of the modern ways of thought.
The 3 elements of all systems, whose quantitative simplest measure would be angular momentum (as it measures a point-singularity in a center, a diameter of the vital energy enclosed and the speed of the membrane, as well as its active magnitude – mass, charge, etc.), for that reason the ultimate ‘minimalist particle of our Universe’ (H-planck constant), exist in all systems that endure… When a system has no singularity center, i.e. a blood cell it dies fast. The system must gauge information, and that is the goal of singularities regardless of language. If the system doesn’t have a membrane, it ‘spills out’. If the system has not a vital energy trapped by the collaboration of the center and the membrane, it has not ‘its territory of survival, order and reproduction’.
Those systems and its topological properties ARE thus canonical form capitals of nations, allied to the military border, enclosing citizens, to quarks enclosing with electrons a gravitational/electromagnetic sphere of forces it feeds on, to galaxies with halos of dark matter and central black holes feeding on our light mitochondria like stars and planets. THIS IS THE ESSENTIAL PARTICLE OF REALITY, A TERNARY VITAL, ORGANIC, TOPOLOGICAL SYSTEM, ENSEMBLE, which we need to describe in detail with mathematical methods but IN ITS HIGHER WHYS with sentient-gauging properties for the singularity and organic ones for the whole ensemble. So yes the Universe is pan psychic on account of the singularities-minds-monads, it is organic, on account of its vital energy, and it is constantly moving, memorial, cyclical and repetitive on account on the external membrane, often the only thing we see and of course it is also mathematical. But the causality is often reversed in science, maths are the mirror not the cause.
Space-time is the cause. And the anthropomorphic wishful thinking is also a subjective error proper of all humans, scientists or not – we are not a preferred time space organism. How this egocy (ego+idiocy) creeps in science is sometimes difficult to spot. For example, all the anglo-saxon culture defines itself in philosophy of science as analytical positivist, meaning what it cannot measure does not exist. In brief the singularity, the Maxwell’s demons that create order do NOT exist, so all is obviously ‘entropy and external motion’, the MOST evident modes of external change of beings.
Internal subjective, informative, evolutionary, vital, organic properties that are so often impossible to observe protected by the membrane that cuts-off spacetime is just eliminated from reality by decree of a bunch of arrogant German-British scholars a century ago. This amounts to say cells are points if we do not see in detail, nations do not exist beyond the border. Seriously, this is the main theory about Einstein’s frozen stars aka black holes – because we do not see beyond the c-speed membrane its likely ultra dense quarks (bcb atoms, top quarks etc.) they have no hair, they do not exist. The sentient Universe does not exist then because we humans do ‘not see it’… This is argued in detail when siding with realist Einstein over Bohr (‘the moon doesn’t exist only when I look at it’).
We shall then define a new unit of mathematics, the non-euclidean fractal point with a content of information and energy inside of it, which we might or might not see and ultimately disappear in far away scales of reality. So we shall now first order those scales and infinite clocks with a dimension that also doesn’t seem to exist for physicists, trapped in its ‘single membrane of light space-time continuum, with its single clock)… The fifth dimension where ALL those clocks of time, fractal spacetime beings co-exist. Its metric equations and general laws, which apply to all Space-time organisms in fact should be if humans can ‘get on with their ego fantasies of absolute truths’ the biggest r=evolution of science of the XXI century… And discover the whys of elemental question such as ‘existence indeed’…
Indeed, the reader should be patient after 500 years of an opposite Method of Truth in science – to accumulate detailed analysis with our electronic eyes and extract local laws, giving up the whole forest view, from where to come down, merging both extremes, the details and the whole picture, in a perfect match, which is what this web when finished by other scientists of the XXI century will achieve, truly merging ALL the properties of reality into a veritable understanding not only of those details but the general whys. Problem is most scientists today do NOT even conceive this initial goal of Greek science can be achieved, as the overwhelming description of details in its ‘iterative complexity’ with its ‘local causes’ make them find ‘nebulous’ such a general effort.
…ORDERED IN ∞ SCALES OF GROWING SPACE SIZE WITH SLOWER TIME SPEEDS
“Call information entropy. Nobody knows what entropy really is, so you have the advantage.”
Neumann to Shannon, on the science of duality that studies the two inverse arrows of timespace of the Universe, entropy=pure motion and in/form/ation. And the ignorance humans have of their properties.
‘Philosophy of Science will be completed only by a set of principles regarding information similar to those of Physicists in the study of entropy and locomotion.’
Searle. On the goal achieved in this web.
4th and 5th dimensions of time space: ∆±¡: Entropy & evolution. Its metric.
Next, it follows immediately that if time is curved, and breaks timespace into closed conserved paths, time clocks are infinite as Leibniz and Einstein understood when he said ‘I seem to be the only physicist that thinks there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’.
So the next step of our inquire from the absolute simplicity of ‘eidos’, the first idea or form of the platonic world – the closed path of a time clock, must be to order the multiplicity of those timespace clocks, and for that we need a new dimension of timespace and a metric equation that allow us to travel through it – its mathematical proof. Alas, that equation exists and it is astoundingly simple, and will allow us to order all the time clocks and enclosed ‘vital spaces=energies’ within them.
As they order in ‘scales’ of spatial size, whose similar forms and properties open a new astounding wealth of laws of science hardly explored till this blog, as we are all timespace beings, who share certain common properties because we share the 5 Dimensions of space-time. Laws that we shall call Dimensional Isomorphisms or ‘Ðisomorphisms’ (ab. Ð).
All those scales (ab.∆±¡) are topologically similar, differentiated only by the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’: Size in space x Time frequency =constant.
As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric.
In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature, once the ‘first phase of any new scientific paradigm’ (resistance of authority) crumbles by the sheer weight of facts explained by the new paradigm.
In the graph, the Universe is a fractal system that reproduces spatial information and temporal energy, carried in the cycles and forms of its clocks of time in multiple scales of spatial size.
Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).
Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.
So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.
In the graphs ‘5th dimension metric’ and its ‘Ðisomorphic’ laws apply to ALL PLANES of existence of reality ,each one studied by a stience, according to size. We observe the main physical and Socio-Biological Superorganisms of space-time whose ternary ∆§±1 beings co-existing in 3 relative planes, the atomic, ∆-1 (cellular, individual), ∆º:magnetic /thermodynamic, (organic or national in biological and social systems) and ∆+1 gravitational (ecosystemic or world in biological and social systems).
It is precisely the existence of a 5D metric what pegs those ternary planes together and allows its synchronicity and simultaneity as energy and information can travel between those scales according to the definition of a ‘space-time’ dimension.
In that regard, NOT all planes of the Universe follow the same metric equations, but certain families of related species do, which allow their symbiosis and social evolution. So we can assess the existence of a super organism, like the galaxy or a biological organism, when the product of both parameters, time clocks and spatial size remains co-invariant in 3 relative ∆§±I scales – which will be ‘tighter’ form smaller systems, and as large as the whole range of perceived scales from the quantum potential (∆-4) to the cosmos (∆+4) in the galaxy:
5D metric: $p x ðƒ=K
Where $p is an alternative expression for lineal distance-space-past, the simplest ‘information’ we obtain from any being; while ðƒ means temporal, cyclical future, information, measure by frequency. We latter will introduce more precise symbols, but the simplicity of those 2 terms, $p, ‘spatial lineal past’ and ðƒ cyclical, temporal future conveys the deepest simplest meaning of reality both in simultaneous space (S x T = K) and sequential time $p>ðƒ, as the arrow of future is dominant in information that forms a system inwards, warping it as ‘time curves space into mass’ (Einstein).
THE PREVIOUS EQUATION respects the definition of a ‘canonical equation of a dimension of space-time’ which exists according to mathematicians like Klein precisely when the product of both parameters remains ‘co-invariant’, so a system can travel though it (as for example light does between scales with its specific metric or constant c-speed of reproduction of information).
Whereas K is a vital or Universal constant of ‘action’ that defines the co-invariance of the product of spatial entropy=extension and temporal information stored in the frequency of its time cycles in any system (metabolic constant in life beings; H, K and C quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational constants of action, entropy and motion in physics).
We cannot overextend in this introduction on the them of 5D metric, studied in other posts in more detail, but a few examples of biological and physical super organisms will suffice to observe the importance of this discovery.
First we already noticed that as smaller systems carry more information, in its faster cycles, smaller scales code larger ones, genes code organisms, humans code civilizations and quantum numbers called atomic systems.
Next we can observe a direct biological and physical example of the existence of such ‘phyla’ of related species, which follow a given 5D metric (in the fractal Universe by definition as Einstein noticed in physics all laws have a ‘local diffeomorphic symmetry’:
In the graph, the extraordinary capacity to explain the meaning of the fundamental laws of biological, physical and social systems (which we normally escape in the examples for sake of simplicity): animals accelerate their circadian and metabolic cycles as they become smaller, but the product of its volume in space and time clocks remains invariant.
So happens with planets who enclose a proportional volume of space with its orbital clocks, and any physical system, which accelerates its frequencies/temperatures/speeds but its ‘actions’ – the fundamental unit of physical systems, product its energy ‘volume’ and time ‘frequency’ remain constant.
Since due to such metric ‘co-ordination’, systems can co-exist in 3 of such ‘scales’ of size, in symbiosis between its smaller parts with faster informative cycles (ab. ∆-1) that code the ‘quantum, genetic or memetic’ information of larger physical, biological or social systems (∆º). While the larger scale, the whole commands in simultaneity the motions of smaller parts. And that symbiotic co-existence creates the ternary scalar structure of a space-time super organism, enclosed in a larger ∆+1 world; proper of all ‘vital, fractal spacetimes’ of reality (ab. time§paœrganism, Œ).
In those timespace organisms the time clocks of the smaller ∆-1 scale store the information of the system in the form and frequency of its cycles.
On the other hand, the larger whole, encloses within its membrane and synchronises with its internal ‘physiological networks or forces’, (biological, physical systems) the motions of the system in space. So we equate information with the static view of clock cycles. And motion with the dynamic view of spatial extension and consider that the structure of time and space is the origin of the entropic motions and informative bits of any system, which can be defined as a super organism of space-time.
So this blog will not only correct and improve our view of the Universe but far more importantly make us understand life, man and history much better than we do today.
So as organic space-time beings co-existing in several scales, we do change also the word science for STienœ, stienœs that describe the different space-time beings ordered by 5D metric.
And then consider how humans look as timespace organisms (ab. T.Œs), guided by both arrows of time, motion≈entropy and in/form/ation and the Ðisomorphic laws of all those T.œs.
∆§ðœ±¡ is then a synoptic expression of those super organisms and its 5 dimensions, fractal space, cycles of time, self-centered into an œrganism, of the ∆ø plane, with a dimension of social evolution ∆+¡ and one of entropy, ∆-¡ as its limiting planes.
So besides the 3 space dimensions ≈ 3 time dimensions (seen as still in space, as moving in time) we do need to consider at least 2 more dimensions, one for the lower scales of the being, which we shall call the fourth dimension of absolute past and one for the upper dimension of the being of absolute future.
We do have then mathematical and verbal, logic mirrors to express those 5 dimensions of space-time, the ultimate substances and unify with them ALL SCIENCES, departing from the properties of those dimensions its structures in space and travels in time, each ‘stience’ of space-time studying an scale, including those who describe man.
Thus this is the Universe in a nutshell, repeated ad nauseam in all scales, and we shall repeat with kaleidoscopic variations the previous paragraphs to describe the thoughts of ‘god’, to make organic systems tracing world cycles, regardless of the huge details scientists have obtained so far.
So the organic paradigm has taken longer to be formalised, as we do in this blog, because it requires to ad to the motions in space studied by physicists, the arrow of in-formation, of form, stored in the form and frequency of the clocks of time cycles of reality, which are along its lineal motions in space the two elements that conform all realities, by combining and integrating into ‘vital energy systems’.
Those 3 arrows spreading across different scales of size, which add 2 more space-time dimensions of ‘wholes and parts’ to the mix, will allow us to describe all what exists as an organism of space-time, the long-seeked ‘sound organic philosophy of science’, reflected in the graph.S-paces
All of the co-exist in at least 3 scale, so we talk of ∆-1 cells/atoms/particles/molecules/points that will form 3 physiological networks, of relative entropy-motion, energy and in/form/ation, put together into an ∆º individual whole, existing in a larger ∆+1 relative world. So we can map out all those super organisms according to scale, each one studied by a different ‘science’, (stience of space-time beings). In the graph a fast review of the super organisms of the Universe in space and time, through its 3±1 dimensions origin of its Ðisomorphic laws. They define the 3 relative present dimensions of all ensemble of systems, made of ‘angular monentum’≈ cyclical time clocks, lineal momentum≈ lineal limbs/fields and a vital energy, the integral, combination of both (V+T). We shall call those 3 conserved quantities of any ‘fractal part of the Universe’ and its ensembles into complex organisms, the 3 ‘present dimensions of fractal space-time’, which create the beings perceived in the relative present ‘finitesimal time of a world cycle of life and death’, of different duration according to the ‘scale’ and speed of the clocks of the being.
Such model is vastly more explanative of reality than the mechanical abstract models dominant in the tradition of physical sciences for a few basic reasons:
- Only an organism replicates itself without the concourse of a ‘maker of the machine’ – God in the earlier physicists’ view, now obsolete. As machines do not reproduce.
- Only the definition of time as the substance of reality – cyclical motion that reproduces form allows the Universe to move, as only if motion=time is the ultimate substance the Universe never stops.
- Only if it is cyclical, repetitive, there are laws of science which are precisely those repetitive motions.
- Finally we know since Relativity that there are infinite clocks of time with different speeds (we knew it always just looking at the clocks of nature, but the expansion of physicists’ way of measuring all time clocks equalised to the rhythms of the mechanical clock, had obscured those facts.
Of course if we want just to ‘measure’ from a human point of view, those rhythms, a single mechanical standard of time, the second can study those cycles, and a single line that ads ‘cycles’ pegging them can represent the time duration of a being, but we loose its meaning, its form, its in-form-ation. And if we want to make a complex analysis of the whys and repetitive patterns, and organisation of those patterns we won’t be able to do it.
Super-organisms: knots of cyclical Time Arrows.
‘We are all made of spatial ‘—motions’, flows that seem to occupy space but are ‘vital space’ and have a ‘causal why’. For that reason, all species participate of the geometric and causal properties of the arrows of ‘—motions’ and information and follow the same patterns of self-organization to create a higher ‘space-time plane’ of reality. So, for example, all informative systems will be on top, in the dimension of height; they will be smaller than the complementary ‘—motions’ system and they will have cyclical form, regardless of the species we describe. So DNA nuclei are round and smaller than the cell’s body, heads and antennas are on top and are cyclical and smaller than the body or tower that holds them, cameras are small and spherical, etc.
Since, once we understand the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, the old distinction between organic and inorganic form loses its meaning, beyond its anthropomorphic role of making man the only intelligent, vital species of the Universe.
The complex logic and Non-Euclidean geometry of those knots of Time Arrows set the formal basis to understand the structure of the Universe and all its self-similar parts. Since:
‘The Universe and all its parts are fractal entities of ‘—motions’ and information.’
Though the specific combinations of ‘—motions’ or information of each species – defined by its ‘vital’ or physical, Universal Constants (‘—motions’/information ratios) – might vary, the space-time structures and cycles of all those social organisms will be self-similar: All entities are ‘cellular societies’ organized through ‘—motions’ and information networks that bring about processes of social evolution.
In all species studied by science a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous, informative system.
A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network of ‘—motions’ (salvia) and information (chemical particles). Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative isomorphisms and economic networks that provide their ‘—motions’.
Stiences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of ‘—motions’ and information. In the graph, we see the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, Sp<=>Tƒ, which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of ‘—motions’ and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:
- Cellular units.
- Networks of ‘—motions’ or vital space.
- Networks of fractal information.
- Networks that reproduce ‘—motions’ and information.
All entities are generated by reproductions and transformations of ‘—motions’ and informative cycles (ΣS<=>Tƒ), organized in cellular units, through networks, and ±∆ Planes of self-similar forms. Yet, since those cellular units ∆-1 are made of smaller st-2 cells, which show the same structure, we can define any organic system as a super-organism (made of smaller, self-similar super-organisms):
We establish thereafter a parameter of multiple space-time complexity, st=∆, to classify all those relative scales of spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information of the Universe, starting by the simplest scales, st=0 (mathematical cycles and lines), st=1 (Gravitational space), st=2 (electromagnetic space), st=3 (atomic particles) and so on, till reaching the most complex, macro-structures of the Universe (st=9, galaxies).
This parameter becomes essential to formalize a type of scientific isomorphisms widely ignored by science, which define the interåctions between several scales of reality. In physics:
– Between the small quantum scale of electroweak forces and the bigger gravitational space-time.
– In biology between the cellular microcosms, the individual organism and the ecosystems or societies in which those organisms exist, as individual ‘cells’ of a bigger whole – the species. Since those relationships are essential to explain all kind of natural and social phenomena, from the life/death cycle (in which cells reproduce, organize socially in networks, emerge as individuals of herds and societies, and die, dissolving again their complex ‘st’ networks into ∆-1 cells), to the meaning of religions, in which humans act as mental cells of a subconscious collective we call God.
At present though, each science studies only one scale of form and its specific isomorphisms and events, as if they were unrelated to the isomorphisms of all other scales and species. Only System Stiences, the philosophy of science considered in this work, studies together the mathematical, morphological and biological isomorphisms that define the 4 main arrows of time and apply those isomorphisms to all the species of each of those scales, since the Isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times are common to all of them, regardless of the ‘specific’ qualities of each species:
– All species in the Universe absorb ‘—motions’, gauge information (even particles, reason why their theories are called gauge theories), reproduce (quarks absorb ‘—motions’ and reproduce jets of ‘quarkitos’; so do electrons that absorb ‘—motions’ and break into a shower of new electrons, and since those are the two basic particles of reality, it follows that all systems can be reproduced), and finally, all entities of the Universe evolve socially, gathering together into bigger super-organisms, from particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become living organisms that become societies, nations and religions, super-organisms of History.
Thus Super-organisms are made of:
– Relative ‘—motions’ and information units (ΣSe, ∏Tƒ), whose cycles/cells of transformation are described by feed-back equations
– 3 dimensions/physiological networks of ‘—motions’, information and reproduction (ΣSp∆-1,<=>, ∆).
– Their ±∆ social Planes that ad ∆-1 cells into ΣExist-ential wholes, parts of a bigger Existential ∆+1 whole.
Recap: The 2 primary arrows of time, ‘—motions’ and information are geometrical, and its properties can be studied with the isomorphisms of mathematical physics; while the 2 complex arrows of time, reproduction and social evolution are biological, explained as ‘strategies of survival’ that ensure the immortality of the logic systems of the Universe.
The shapes of ‘—motions’ and information are ‘invariant at scale’, meaning that cycles of information on one side and forces of lineal ‘—motions’ on the other side, reproduce their shapes and gather together into bigger, cellular, social networks, creating dual entities, made of ‘fields/bodies of ‘—motions’’ (physical/biological jargon) and ‘particles/heads of information’, (Principle of Complementarity). All systems of the Universe are complementary, formed with a region dominant in ‘—motions’ arrows (body or force) and a region dominant in information cycles (particle, head). Those dual, social, whole entities have more ‘—motions’ and last longer in time than individual parts. Thus, species with a limited vital space and time duration ensure their immortality by expanding its size in space and its duration in time, as parts of bigger ‘—motions’/information systems.
In the graphs, we classify all the scales of the 5th dimension as super organisms according to the social networks that create below all Universal and human super organisms:
‘A super-organism is a group of cellular super-organisms joined by energetic, informative and reproductive networks.’
The principle of organicism: The 4th paradigm of knowledge.
A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.
The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.
The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.
The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.
In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.
Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future. So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rdparadigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.
That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts? Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rdparadigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).
According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe. The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newtonnt.0.4. Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.
The 4th paradigm in a nutshell: The Universe is an organic system of energy and information.
All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of energy and information, which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.
In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.
In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.
Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.
We can, departing from those concepts, define also the Universe and all its parts:
‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that self-organize themselves in bigger, self-similar scales’.
THE ORDER OF 5 DIMOTIONS:
SIMULTANEOUS SUPERORGANISMS, SCALAR ACTIONS & SEQUENTIAL WORLDCYCLES.
‘If you cannot explain it simple, you don’t understand it.’ Einstein
Different forms of expressing the 5 dimotions: worldcycles in sequential time – actions in space-time scales, supeorganisms in space.
How to study the Universe of superorganisms tracing worldcycles is simple:
When you order those dimotions in time sequence you get a world cycle, when you order those dimotions in space you obtain a super organism; when you order those dimotions in timespace scales you get the 5 vital actions of existence.
This sentence IN italic IS PERHAPS the most important sentence of the whole blog – the ORDER of reality that transcends for mere time clock-cycles and spatial forms into THE COMPLEX REALITY we see, including us.
Existence as a travel through the fifth dimension.
Now the importance of having a metric equation that leaves co-invariant a motion through its parameters of space-time, is that we can ‘travel’ across this dimension. Indeed, the mathematician Klein defined the existence of a dimension of space-time, when we could formulate a co-invariant equation left unchanged when we move through the space-time dimension. So how we travel through the fifth dimension? Obviously by growing in size in space through the process of reproduction and evolution, from an ∆-1 fast seed of information, emerging, as a larger whole with slower time clocks, in the organic level, which itself is part of a larger world, with slower ‘deep time’ geological and cultural cycles.
So Existence is indeed a travel through the fifth dimension, and the mere fact that all systems of nature exist through that world cycle (no longer a physical worldline in a 4D Universe as we have added a dimension of temporal ‘depth’), IS an absolute experimental proof of the existence of 5D:
In that sense the main difference when we widen our understanding of space-time with the metric equations of 5D is to be able to explain NOT only processes of time-change in a single planes of space-time, mostly due to locomotions, but process of change due to transformations in the in-form-ation of beings, related to life, organic structures and hence to solve some of the eternal existential questions about ‘existence’, which will be now defined easily as a ‘travel between 3 scales of the fifth dimension’.
The Worldcycles of existence.
In the graph the minimal units of our Universe Non-E particle points gauge information, feed on energy absorbing other particles, to reproduce with that energy by decoupling new particles, which evolve socially by ‘gender complementarity’ or ‘social evolution’ guided by magnetic forces into larger, ‘atomic wholes’, which then evolve further into new scales called molecules, states of matter, organic cells, ecosystems, geological formations, planets, global societies, solar systems and galaxies, whose metric equation is similar to that of an atom starting an entire new game of ∆§cales.
The conclusion is obvious:
The problem is NOT the organic Universe but the ego of man, as we repeat everywhere in this blog.
In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the 3±1 ages of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±∆1 change=time:
+1: Conception: ruled by social evolution, as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks.
1st age: Youth or Age of motion.
2nd age: of energy that reproduces and iterates the system.
3rd age: All motion & energy becomes form, in-form-atio, exhausting itself.
-1:Death: The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells.
In the graph we describe that law of 3±1 ages, cycles, or horizons of evolutions for the fundamental species of reality.
The less important parts are in fact those studied by physicists as ‘time arrows’, the locomotion and the final entropic death – as systems can exist only as body-heads.
To understand that duality in depth, we have to recall the Law of Complementarity between energy and information: all systems are made with a body/field of energy and a head/particle of information. The is the basis of quantum physics.
The potentials/limbs can be external. In simple animals limbs regenerate…
Further on, since form is made with motion, all events must start with an amount of ‘simple’ motion that transforms itself into still form, information. Then, when all motion is consumed, warped into information, death reverses its cycle.
Yet in the middle of that cycle, when information and motion are in balance, to preserve the ‘bio-logic’ form created in that process, the system achieves its reproduction, through ‘hyperbolic energy’.
So between the ∆±1 processes of social evolution (generation and emergence into a higher plane) and entropy (death and dissolution back to ∆-1), in a single plane of existence we can describe reality just with the 3 canonical topological planes (bidimensional parts: flat limbs, hyperbolic body-waves and spherical particle-heads), whose topological forms best suit its functions.
Yet for the full description we need the ∆±1 seminal reproduction and entropic generation and death.
The most important as in all fractals, vital or mathematical is obviously reproduction, imposed by survival:
So the ‘offspring’ of the being will carry on its information into the future.
Information never disappears as it always recreates itself. And since all is motion by the mere fact that time moves with form, by the mere fact that momentum-energy is conserved memorial reproduction of cyclical forms ‘happens’ In fact science is nothing but the recollection in human languages of those memorial reproductions, which become repetitive ‘laws of science’.
All beings, from fundamental particles, (electrons and quarks) to human beings and life species, reproduce or are reproduced by more complex systems, when they have extra-energy to imprint its in-form-ation. Since forms that do not reproduce, die away and become extinct.
So even those deconstructed beings that cannot reproduce alone are reproduced by other species. For example, cells reproduce carbohydrates, galaxies reproduce stars and human reproduce machines in factories.
Thus, we talk of 3±1 drives of live, arrows or ages of existence in all systems: the drive for limb motion body energy, the drive for information, the drive for reproduction and the drive of social d=evolution (birth and death of a macro-organism).
Whereas the 3±1 ages of Organic Time are merely the order in which those 3±1 drives ‘accumulate’ during the life/death cycle of any species, sequentially.
If we put them in adjacent spatial forms, through 3 scales of ∆-1 atomic/cellular/ individual, ∆ø organic/thermodynamic/social, ∆+1 cosmological/geological/national planes, we get a super organism of fractal space.
And that is all what there is to it: 5 dimotions ordered in time as sequential world cycles, in scalar ∆±1 space as super organisms.
In a young first age, motion is more abundant. In the mature age of balance, the species reproduces, combining motion and form, into hyperbolic body-waves of energy (max. motion, minimal form) and information (form in action, maximal form, minimal motion).
In the third age of the species, energy is scarce but information is abundant, accumulated in the first ages till it becomes PURE FORM, and then explodes back into PURE motion, in the entropic moment of death.
So we can cast also the two ‘extremal’, external ∆±1 arrows of pure still form as generating seeds and minds, and pure scattering motion as big bangs of entropy and death.
It is from those 5 elements, from where ALL REALITIES laws of stience, forms in space, still mind-languages and motions in time, life and death processes, world cycles of existence will be BY ITERATION AND COMBINATION explained.
ALL is encoded in the 5 dimotions of time-space because that is all what we are.
Young people are full of motion. They are in the motion horizon of the species. They are bigger, have little temporal knowledge. They are simple in form. While Old people are full of information. They are in the information horizon of the species till they stop into pure form – but as time IS ALL AND TIME IS MOTION, THEY CANNOT STOP. So when information stops in ‘action’, death explodes.
Old people, warped matters are smaller, as all information systems are and have a lot of temporal memories. They move little and have a lot of wrinkles.
Mature people balance the two elements of the organic Universe, their content of energy-space and temporal information. So they can reproduce all their components. Hence the 2nd age is the age of reproduction. And the forms of any being in that mature age are a harmonic, an efficient combination of energy lines and informative cycles that we perceive as ‘beautiful’, theobjective perception of harmony between energy and information, lines and cycles. So in all organisms the mature, realistic, classic age of balance, or reproductive age, is the most perfect age. Human beings intuitively see that. We like balanced, spiral galaxies, mature people and realist art, which is called classic art and takes place in the mature age of civilizations.
Yet, the dominant arrow of time, information, will finally exhaust energy, warp totally the organism and bring its explosive death. And the cycle will start again.
The result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality.
The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle and its 3±1 ages. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes humans, societies (super-organisms of human beings) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time.
Let us finally see the 3rd approach to those dimotions as exchanges of motion and form ‘energy and information’ between scales of reality, considering first the vital view of the 5 dimotions (a simple application of the Rashomon effect) and then connect those time space ‘fast actions’ in a sequential order to see how they define in the long time view a clear arrow of increasing life information that will finally explode back into entropy defining the world cycle of existence of all beings.
We can now understand better why we write in a simplified manner the ‘Generator equation’ of a system in time as:
$p ≤ E x I ≤ ðƒ, for a simultaneous superorganism, where the ‘Body-wave of energy and information, ∑ e x ∏ I, receives information from its particle-head, which ‘shrinks’ it, ≤, and entropic motion from its potential limbs that expands it ≤, balancing both in search of immortality.
This ‘view’ of the 3 parts towards equilibrium and dynamic balance is however offset by the constant relentless motion towards higher information of the sum of the actions of the being as locomotion-entropy are motion dominant but the other 3 dimotions, information, reproduction and social evolution ‘tighten’ the system in space (information-social evolution) with reproduction trying to balance by iteration. So we might consider that the 5 dimotions are in dual balances:
Perception ≈ Locomotion; Entropy ≈ social evolution; reproduction…
But in practice Perception happens ALL the time and locomotion many times; Social Evolution happens all the time; and entropy-death only a quanta of time… So the higher frequency of informative motions over entropic motions defines an overall arrow of time ‘that bends space’, aging the system: $p ≥ E x I ≥ ðƒ.
And so interesting enough the logic equation in space of a super organism is inverse in terms of ST implosion. And this will constantly come up in our analysis of the ‘perpendicular, inverse properties of Lineal Spacetime $t: limbs-potentials and cyclical time space, §ð.
The 5 Dimotions of timespace as actions of existence.
The i-logic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time (Galilean relativity, fine-tuned in Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²). So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.
That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…
The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.
So they said the Universe is dying and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPY-scattering motions-death aka weapons.
THE UNIVERSE REINFORCES THE PROGRAM OF THE 5 ARROWS OF TIME with SENSATIONS the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (ARROW of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).
When we order those ‘dimotions’ in space we get a superorganism,when we order them in time we obtain a worldcycle of existence, when we order them in scales, we obtain the 5 actions of all systems that absorb energy from its lower ∆-2 scale (humans absorb amino acids), information from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb light), motion from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb gravitation) or simplex actions, while developing two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution from its higher, ∆-1 seminal scale, ∆o scale and ∆+1 social scale.
Actions are thus the FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE of the limits of perception of any ∆ø and relate directly ‘perception’ and ‘stientific’ knowledge to the relative position of the mind that perceives. They are also the essential element to fully grasp WHY we perceive only a limit number of scales of reality with us at the center: namely because we ‘HAVE THOSE ∆±¡ practical limits in our actions’ – NOT because there are NO more scales above or below – a very strong, logic proof on the infinity of scales:
In the graphs, from my first 30 years old book on 5Ð planes, one of my earlier drawings of the planes and dimotions in which the humind co-exists with its will to ‘act’ and perceive the ‘sensorial’ motions, energy food, informative pixels, seminal orgasms and social loving higher complex actions that ensure the reproduction and species’ evolution into a higher plane, that of the social culture, nation, civilization or God – the subconscious collective of a people.
We can see the symmetry between those actions across different scales of existence of the fifth dimension, while extracting from the ∆±4 levels of existence the different quanta of ‘energy’ (∆-2), ‘information’ (∆-3), ‘motion’ (∆-4), or actions at distance, easy to obtain, ‘simplex actions’, vs. the actions of complex organisation, Œ, and Û, capitalised, for that reason, most often, or complex actions which also require ‘bits and bites’ of ∆-1 seminal and ∆º+1 social scales.
Then in each of those 5D time scales, the mind ‘travells’ through the scales it perceives in order to extract, absorb and emit the different forms of entropy, energy and information, which ensures the survival of its being, internally (simplex actions, aei) and externally (complex reproductive and social actions) in its ∆+1 territorial world.
It follows for all what we have seen that we can define now exist¡ence easily in terms of 5 D Planes:
‘Existence is a constant travel through planes of the fifth dimension”
But are humans the only species that move, perceive, kill to feed on energy, reproduce and evolve socially? Since if at least they were unique as they pretend in those sensations, they could claim to be ‘special’. Fact though is they are NOT. Those 5 ‘dimotions’ of timespace (a better word composed of dimensional motion, to define each of the 5 arrows of time), exist in all systems of Nature, as we can observe them in life. They in fact define the 5 arrows of life in biological terms, as life is defined as a system of 5 Dimotions able to process information, feed on energy, move, reproduce and evolve socially.
Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 4 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of space-time as the attached graph shows:
So all systems of the Universe ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles.
So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic code but only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.
DEATH is the needed error of the Universe NOT desired by the program.
For that reason it lasts only a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time IS for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom/individual’ of its lower, ∆-¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).
So you die in a second, your relative time-clock quanta the time of 1 thought=glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your body-heart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is life-lasting…
Same with the conundrum of antiparticles (entropy=death arrow of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around. Death is the shortest possible arrow:
This is LEIBNIZ: ‘THE UNIVERSE is the most perfect of all worlds possible’.
Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.
ONLY man obsessed since physicists took over as high priests of time with its shallow ‘brief history’ of those ‘deep arrows; made of the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion the meaning of its existence. Because he has shown himself unable to love even his own species and emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms…
Actions=Ðimotions as steps of space-time.
It follows also from what we have said that Dimotions have a vital meaning – they are in fact ‘actions of existence’.
First we have defined relational space-time, affirming the GREAT ‘IDEA’ that Wheeler was waiting for: we ARE made of fractal vital energy=space enclosed by angular momentum=time cycles.
Next we study in more detail space and its 3 topologies to define the forms=functions of beings; and its 5 Ðimotions of space-time.
Now we shall bring the key transition from the ‘abstract’ definition of topological dimension and motions in time to the vital ‘need’ for those Ðimotions in the species of reality. Why there are Ðimotions?
Because broken into infinite minute Ðimotions of each system of reality, they become the ‘vital drives of life and existence’ the species need to survive: the Ðimotion of locomotion becomes the needed entropy to make the potential-limbs work, the Ðimotion of information becomes the needed gauging of information for the particles-heads, and the Ðimotion of hyperbolic iteration, the reproductive dimotion to keep the organism going. So we have 3 simplex dimotions to satisfy the needs of the 3 simple parts of the organism… And then the two complex transversal 4D and 5D entropic and social Dimotions of death and life-organization, which fully ‘ensembles’ reality and gives it a vital meaning to it all.
RECAP. The Universe is a fractal super organism of space and time, broken into infinite self-similar super organisms, each of them co-existing in 3 relative planes of time space organisms, with different spatial size and temporal speed (quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales in physical organisms, cellular, individual and ecosystemic in biological organisms). What defines each of those families of super organisms is the co-existence and symbiosis of its 3 scales, achieved through a coinvariant metric equation that relates those spatial sizes and speed of time clocks, which defines a fifth dimension of scalar space-time: $p (size in space) x ðƒ (speed of time clocks) = Constant.
2 immediate features are deduced of that metric equation: smaller systems run faster time cycles and hence code the information of larger systems (memes code societies, genes organisms and quantum numbers atomic ensembles), while larger wholes enclose with its membrane-singularity structure the whole system providing its synchronous motions and energy. So space-time organisms have organic, symobitic properties. Further on as any co-invariant time space equation defines the existence of a dimension since it allows a system to travel through space and time, we can safely define a fifth dimension of space-time, and wonder how we travel through it? Simple, through our existence as we are born in the smaller faster seminal scale, reproduce and organize through networks into larger wholes with slower time cycles (as they must first synchronize its internal parts, before they can act as a single whole)… emerging as a single organism in the ∆o scale where the singularity will perceive and enact actions of survival, traveling in the larger world ∆+1 till its selfish membrane-singularity systems exhaust its inner energy and the system dies, dissolving back to the ∆-1 plane, in a zero sum that defines all existences as travel through the fifth dimension.
It follows then that the main, most general laws of all sciences are the laws of ‘stience’, the laws of space-time organisms encoded in his 3 ‘single plane’ dimentional motions of time space (ab. dimotions): limbs/potentials of lineal motion, body-waves of iterative energy and informative particles-heads that gauge information and its 2 scalar ones, social evolution into wholes, or fifth dimension proper and entropic dissolution or death, the 4th dimension.
So we can define with the symbols of the advanced I-logic of the Universe a simple equation to define a world cycle of any of those super organisms:
SCALAR, CYCLIC BIG-BANGS
We have now defined the details of the Universe in space as superorganisms and in time as world cycles, born of the sum of smaller parts performing 5D actions of existence. And then show how humans are also space-time beings made of topological space that last a limited worldtime cycle. This is what reality is all about: a toporganic game of super organisms acting to live its world cycles.
Of course, when you ask ‘humans’ what the Universe is, this ‘logic’, vital concept of reality is completely shunned off. Because of the ego of man, vital elements only matter to describe man and similar ‘animal beings’.
So most readers will think all this to be non-sense. Their mind has been ‘tamed’ not to see those features that really matter. Instead all what scientists ask about the Universe is a pure description of its ‘locomotions’ (only one of its dimensions of time), and spatial ‘extensions’ (seen in a single space-time plane, the plane of light space-time, our mental world-view). This shallow reductionist view of the entangled, fractal, vital organic Universe becomes then canonical knowledge and suffices to the ‘reduced’ view of man’s ego for whom vital qualities are ‘invisible’ in other beings.
Still the accurate description in mathematical physics of the spatial extension and formal evolution of the whole physical Universe is worth to know as an important part of knowledge. And so we must wonder, how that description of a Universe will ‘improve’ and change with the new insights given by the fractal structure of space into scales, and the cyclical nature of time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.
The answer will surprise the readers – because it shows how distorted human views of reality are, when the first principles are ignored and the ego of man reduces reality.
UPGRADING PHILOSOPHY OF TIME – RELATIVITY – CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES.
We cannot in this introduction explore the huge field of physical systems, nor entangle your mind on the complexities of its mathematics, reserved for the complex posts in lower lanes.
So we shall just upgrade 3 fundamental themes of philosophy of physics, the meaning of TIME, the meaning relativity that started the field in modern times, when Galileo realized the ‘Earth moved but didn’t move’ (e pur si muove, no muove); and so it kick the process of study of motions, which became the trademark of ‘reductionist physics’ due to its worldly profession (making weapons of maximal motion-entropy); and the fundamental principle found in the study of those motions, the 3 principles of conservation of energy, lineal and cyclical momentum.
And then upgrade our cosmological theory of the Universe, within the milieu of our new advanced views of fractal space and cyclical time.
Past, present and future time dimotions. Absolute and relative time.
Let us now consider very briefly the correspondence principle between the classic concepts of time space from Galileo to Einstein and the expanded one, which includes properly all the dimotions of time. Specifically we shall state now that what Physicists study as time, IS only present time, instants in which they measure simultaneously the locomotions of beings, with ‘derivatives’ – so reducing change to its minimal expression within a single slice of the whole flow of time. The question then to define is the absolute arrows of time, of past and future, missed in that description of time, as a mere instant of ‘space-motion’ v=∂s/∂t. In other words, when we ad the arrow of entropy and dissolution and the arrow of wholeness, of evolution of form, THE SCALAR ARROWS OF DEEP TIME-SPACE, which one is the past and the future?
The answer is obvious. As a whole needs its parts first, to become, the arrow of the disjoined parts or ‘entropy’ is the arrow of past, and the arrow of ‘wholeness’ and organic evolution of ‘DEEP time’, as it includes both parts and wholes co-existing together is the arrow of the future.
And this is an absolute arrow, as it is pure logic. The Universe thus becomes constantly more and more entangled, building up new organic co-existing structures made of multiple layers. And because that is the preferential arrow of the Universe, call it eusocial love in social systems, and biological herds, or mathematical numbers in physics, as numbers are just social herds, every part of it strives to increase its social evolution and languages of information that synchronize them. In a short term view of course all systems end up ‘going back to the past of entropy and dissolving’. But in as much as systems want to acquire information, death IS a single quanta of time, which explodes the being, so he can keep returning again to the slow process of time-building of social structure.
So when we wrote the metric equation of the fifth dimension as:
$p x ðƒ = K we can interpret it in terms of past present and future as $p, lineal past, entropic, spacetime and ðƒ: curved, informative temporal future, where ƒ is the frequency of the system and the symbol for future flows.
We will latter give different versions of the formula, according to the different dimotions we consider – the universe, mind the reader, has a very different ‘logic’ to that of man, as it is an entangled reality in which all the parts constantly influence each other, all the dimotions interact, and so despite starting with only 5 motions-forms (3±¡, if we account for the difference between the present space-time super organisms, and the ∆§cales) by iteration and combination things can get as complex as they seem. In that regard, the previous formula can also define.
Thus unlike the simplified concept of time=change=locomotion of physicists as ONLY change=translation in space (v=s/t), when we add the ‘biological’, evolutionary time=change in in/form/ation, we can also explain the biological changes of life and death of human organisms, our topological VARIATIONS of forms in (evolution theory), and the mirrors of those changes produced by our languages of perception… which become the memetic ‘languages’ that organize change in the social organisms of history, mankind in time.
So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).
SINCE HUMAN AND BIOLOGICAL CHANGE is primarily ‘informative, social, technological and biological time=change’ NOT translative change=time, the ONLY one physicists study (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its fine-tuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²).
So we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discovered their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, also called Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein, which defined time as the fourth dimension of space, since physicists merely was used it to measure spatial changes in location.
But not even with that enormous reductionism of the 5 Dimotions of timespace, they could fully understand the meaning of relativity – that is the fact that we do NOT see the Earth moving, despite the fact that it moves, because our Mind ‘stops’ its motions to create a linguistic mind-mapping of the world in which it lives, to better focus its information.
In other posts we shall see the enormous consequences of the proper understanding of relativity, as it will define the duality particle-wave, since all systems, move as waves and stop as particles to gauge information; an extraordinary fact of quantum physics that must be incorporated to the explanation of its spooky effects.
The Galilean paradoxes: Continuity or discontinuity, motion or form, flat or curved Universe; Both.
In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation in space, use of clocks, etc.):
The discontinuity of space and time is the key to unify the laws of sciences that describe different species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time. In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance.
When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:
Any piece of time/space seems continuous, but when we analyze it in detail, it becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths. The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.
There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.
The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws.
It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality: - The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’). - And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being.
Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second. The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy. We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms. And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:
And we call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’).
Definition of a Dimension as motion and distances. The Paradox of Galileo.
The first truism of scalar space-time theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.
Thus the universe of space-time in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion-’—motions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clock-like motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.
And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute space-time to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.
The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:
In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.
Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple åctions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.
The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’
The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together:
All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…
The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.
Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of Non-Aristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same space-time than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.
So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’
Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.
In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their time-clocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:
– The vacuum of our scale of space-time is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed space-distance or as electromagnetic motion at c-speed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘—motions’- space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).
– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.
In the graph, we observe the astounding beauty of the paradoxes of Galileo, as they can be seen in space, time or relative scales, defining THE ESSENTIAL DUALITIES OF FREEDOM AND ORDER. So topology becomes metaphysics.
Let us then see the ‘classic concept of the Universe in physical terms’ under the upgrading of relational fractal space and cyclical time.
Conservation principles: Lineal + angular momentum = Energy
1D singularity + 2 D membrane = 3D vital energy.
They give the 3 conserved ‘fractal quantities’ of any super organism of space-time:
-Angular momentum (2D membrane).
-Lineal momentum (motion of the singularity)
-Vital energy (volume enclosed and managed between them).
This is the simplest structure we find in all scales of nature, from atomic systems with an electronic membrane and a nucleus singularity enclosing fields of gravitational and electromagnetic energy, to cells with protein membranes, DNA singularities and vital energy enclosed in cytoplasms, to nations, with a hard-military border, a capital-singularity and a vital energy of middle working reproductive class, to galaxies with a halo of strange, dark matter, a center of top quark black holes and the stars, mitochondria that reproduce them both, to yourself with a sling membrane a nervous brain singularity and a reproductive body.
And this give us the 3 simplest conserved elements of reality, lineal motions (momentum), cyclical momentum and the vital energy reproduced between them.
The Universe is a fractal of 3 elements, space, time and its vital energetic combinations. The iteration of those 3 elements into finite fractal organisms put together create the puzzle of reality we see. This might seem in first principles very simple but becomes more complex as we are talking of a ‘vital’ fractal, which has organic, bio-logical properties, besides topological ones, (which are the only accepted by the religion-dogma of a mathematical only universe) as its goal is to reproduce information (arguably a mathematical fractal also reproduces information departing from a generator, feedback equation, but its abstract jargon doesn’t recognize those properties).
So what we call often ‘vital time§pace’ will be in more formal terms ‘Energy’; the enclosed timespace within a membrane or clock of time, in more formal terms an angular momentum (which becomes a membrane of multiple ‘cellular eddies’ of angular momentum in more complex, iterative systems). And finally the central still, ‘mind’ singularity, particle, crystal or ‘center of gravity’ in physical systems, still DNA of information, or nervous worldview that ‘makes you see’ the Earth still, which we CANNOT perceive internally, will be in physical terms defined by its lineal motion, but we shall explore further in this blog its inner information.
All systems of nature can be ‘reduced’ to fractal ensembles of 3 ‘conserved quantities’, angular momentum – the membrane of the system, which of course becomes a fractal sum of ‘cellular cycles’ of the skin of the system in human beings. And so on…
As we are opening a window to the absolute, each paragraph opens new questions, to which we shall return. Enough though said of the spatial, ‘simultaneous’ view of the being in a single spacetime continuum. We are indeed ‘toporganic’ variations of space.
What about finite time duration, our second component that make us last through our motions a limited time?
Again, as time space is more complex than lineal or absolute time space, the first obvious truth about a system of limited time is to be cyclical made NOT of worldlines but of world cycles that end when the ‘cycle’ returns to its beginning.
So if we are in space simultaneous super organisms of the 3 topologies of space, in time we are ‘world cycles of finite duration’. Let us see indeed, how all those topological beings last cyclical time periods.
Now it is important to consider the necessary adaptation of the jargon of mathematical physics, to the larger view of the jargon of ∆§ð, as it differs slightly. Energy in Physics has precise equations, which differ slightly from the concepts more general used here, as ‘vital energy’, the content of the body-waves.
We shall deal with it in detail in our articles on mathematical physics ‘on the making’… So it will become more precise. I.e. in the graph we see the 3 main formulae for energy and motion in the 3 ‘scales’ of physical organisms. None of them has the exact meaning but all of them are parameters that can be easily related to the 3 conserved elements of any T.œ, whose sum for the entire Universe would give us the total conserved quantities known to physics.
Indeed, what we can see in all the graphs is the use of 3 parameters, loosely related to our 3 conserved quantities. Of them the most essential is angular momentum, the all pervading H constant, as it gives us partial but consistent information of the 3 elements together, the radius of the vital energy of the system, the position of the singularity, and the speed of the membrane-clock, and its ‘mass’ =vital energy distribution… which for most systems tend to be ‘I-logically’ closer to the membrane where its bits get ‘contact’ with the motion from the outside world (while in its center they are ‘devoured’ by the singularity-mind; hence ‘vitally’ systems accumulate their angular momentum on the outer parts of the system)…
Energy then multiplies H for ƒ, the proper measure of the ‘clock of time’ in its purest form, as frequency, but also what tells us the equation, E=Hƒ is that Energy as expressed in physics basically ads to our concept of the ‘content of vital energy of a system’ as a picture of simultaneous space, a ‘length’ of time.
And so it comes immediate, as a solution, that energy ultimately is conserved because measuring the super organism in a length of time, it is in fact measuring its whole world cycle which is also a closed zero sum. This physicists know, but apply it to the single ‘space-time plane’ in which they measure energy, which is conserved when the work returns to the point (closed paths), but we know extend to the scalar dimensions of the ∆±¡, affirming that a Worldcycle of existence is a zero sum, a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension that doesn’t spend energy-time, hence making all systems ultimately as all are born and die, conserved energy cycles and the Universe immortal.
SO THE IMMEDIATE translation of one of the 3 key equations of Einstein, which is with Planck the great colossus of XX century physics for a reason (Planck in fact has there also the Boltzmann constant, of thermodynamics which he defined and gave its name to honor B), E=hƒ is self-evident in terms of ∆§ð:
H is the ‘still picture’ humind observers obtain of whole super organism, the photon, in simultaneous spaces, the minimal action-dimotion of a particle of light space-time, the ultimate layer of our existence we perceive with our electronic eyes. ƒ is its frequency or clock-speed, the number of ‘bits’, of actions, of cycles of existence it performs. And Energy its whole world cycle, at the entropic moment of death, when it is absorbed by its ∆+1 electronic scale (as that is the formula of the photoelectric effect).
And as the graph shows the same interpretation happens for thermodynamics, where we measure also in confusing terminology the entropy-energy of the system (Physicists constantly confuse the dimotions of entropy, energy and locomotion, as we shall clarify in our article on the philosophy of physics – entangled Universe)… And so happens in the other Einstein’s equation, E=mc², where here the key frequency element is given by a mass which is a vortex of accelerated time, whose frequency determines its weight, as we can observe easily putting together both equations: E=mc²+E=hƒ-> m=(h/c²) ƒ; that is the faster the vortex turns, the more mass it has.
This is the picture at the smallest level of ‘quantum paths’, which physicists express as the ‘path of least time’ and the ‘Lagrangian tending to zero’, etc. Do not feel taken aback by physical equations without a clear conceptual reasoning – we shall provide them; and vice versa, if you are a physicist don’t shun off this work because of its apparent simplicity. Trust me, if we have lifetime enough to complete I will pour in the 4th line my 11 annotated books on Lindau’s wonderful encyclopedia of physicists physics relating all the equations of all the subdisciplines of physics to ∆§t, a work I did some 30 years ago… to fully grasp the marvelous Universe, but it is NOT more important than the similar work on social sciences, or biological species…
We shall though provide now the barebones of the Universe in a nutshell, and how this ‘energy zero sum’ works also for the entire Universe, which is also an eternal zero sum, without singularity big-bangs – a clear error of pythagorean wrong interpretation of languages NOT as mirrors of reality but as its cause, clarified in earnest in the III section, as Languages are with physical and socio-biological systems the true 3 disciplines of knowledge – being history just the study of the super organism of mankind and economics, the study of the industrial r=evolution of company-mothers and its offspring of machines and weapons fast evolving to our own peril into AI autonomous robots and self-reproductive factories…
The Universe as it is when we ad the arrow of in-form-ation/gravitation.
In the next graph we observe what we just said in simple equations about the relationship between mass and frequency of an accelerated vortex, again expanded to the other planes, of which we observe in detail a thermodynamic vortex, which becomes a fractal of even faster eddies, beyond the ‘event horizon’ of the hurricane, a fact that will help us to establish the nature of frozen stars=aka black holes in our models of the galactic Eddie…
In the graph, the Universe as it is WHEN the astounding reductionism of physicists’ dogma comes to terms with the experimental evidence of a fractal, organic Universe broken into infinite time clocks in all its ‘scales’ of size, in the case of the Cosmological world… And galaxies which are time vortices that compress the entropy of vacuum into mass through its gravitational forces, are included into the mix.
HOW RIDICULOUS then is to still USE THE PRIMITIVE CONCEPT OF A SINGLE lineal CLOCK OF TIME-locomotion ONLY FOR THE WHOLE UNIVERSE rejecting the addition of the ‘real clocks of time’ of the Universe, its vortices of cosmological mass and quantum charge that ‘fold/warp’ the ‘lineal one-dimensional flat entropy between galaxies’ into 3 Dimensions?
The answer will seem an insult to cosmologists but it is what it is: as ridiculous as talking of Yhwh, the toponym for Judea in ancient Egyptian maps, hence the nation of judaism, as the creator of the Universe… And so obvious as that absurdity when you STOP beliefs and REASON, something scientists ‘think they do’ but mostly don’t:
Without getting into unneeded complex maths, the reader should easily understand the proof of that balanced Universe, once he casts aside his ‘awe’ and ‘respect’ for the ‘high popes’ of science and uses merely reason, why the blunder of ‘cosmological big-bangs’ is a false, half-truth – the key method by which humans ‘invent reality’ to cater their egos – to eliminate and ‘reduce’ the parameters of reality to create a ‘ceteris paribus’ biased theory that cater those egos.
In the case of the big-bang amazing as it will sound to the reader cosmologists eliminate the gravitational forces that bring together vacuum space into the creation of tighter, denser particles, atoms and matter structures within the vortex of galaxies, and through the warping of one-dimensional ‘lines’ of dark entropy≈energy into 3-dimensional ‘tall’ masses, ‘reduce’ the 75% of entropic expansion between galaxies to the 25% of 3-Dimensional mass, establishing a canonical, mathematical equilibrium between expansion of space-time dimensions (expansion of vacuum space) and implosion, akin to the same process happening on a lower quantum scale between attractive matter and repulsive electromagnetic radiation between atoms, towards a thermal equilibrium.
Let us indeed from Hawking, a bad scientist but a good teacher of science, which has no quips recognizing the absurdness of some theories a paragraph that explains this conundrum:
“The trouble with the Hot Big Bang model is the trouble with all cosmology without a theory of initial conditions (MEANING A LIMIT TO THE EQUATIONS): Because general relativity would break down at a singularity, anything could come out of the Big Bang. So why is the universe so homogeneous and isotropic on a large scale yet with local irregularities like galaxies and stars. And why is the universe so close to the dividing line between collapsing again and expanding indefinitely. In order to be as close as we are now the rate of expansion early on had to be chosen fantastically accurately. If the rate of expansion one second after the Big Bang had been less by one part in 10ˆ10, the universe would have collapsed after a few million years. If it had been greater by one part in 10ˆ10, the universe would have been essentially empty after a few million years. In neither case would it have lasted long enough for life to develop. Thus one either has to appeal to the anthropic principle” (RELIGIOUS concept that miraculously in the whole flow of time we are in a balanced point). Not so IT IS MORE LOGIC TO THINK WE ARE in a balanced eternal Universe as our fractal model describes.
The balance between radiation and mass as a steady state, eternal Universe however is ignored by Big Bang cosmologists as they only recognize as a time-future arrow the entropy between galaxies – the expansion of space.
How dumb is that, when we live as human beings inside the vortex of evolutionary information of a planet, turning around a star vortex turning around a galactic vortex?
So we should NOT care at all for the arrow of entropy, secondary to our existence as biological, and technological beings evolving fast our arrow of information at individual level (process of life and aging, warping, wrinkling into form) and collective level (informative evolution of technological machines, aka meta life) and at planetary level (vortex of evolution of stars and galaxies).
Now for the pedantic scholar of astrophysics who thinks this is too simple, oh, yes, it is – the Universe is simple and not malicious and simplicity is genius (Einstein, Leonardo). So what ‘any scientist’ – not only physicist – tend to do to make his ‘ego shine’ is to include unneeded complications and find secondary details to ‘deny’ the obvious truths we have explained here. We do have in the 4th line section on cosmology a whole treatise on the 10 most quoted proofs of the big-bangs with equations and quantitative analysis to show ALL OF THEM, fit better when we explain big-bangs as ‘local quasar deaths’ of those galactic vortices, ultimately as all physical systems dual in its implosive and explosive EM arrows expressed in Einstein’s work. Then, all falls right – and in this the details were provided in his latter years by Fred Hoyle, the true genius of Cosmology that rightly considered a ‘fractal series of quasar-big bangs’ in each galaxy, all of them balanced by the entropy between them, with a steady state of continuous creation of matter. Hoyle of course invented as a mockery the term big-bang as an allusion to the worldly job of his main proponent Mr. Gamow, who had worked in the Atomic bomb.
The realpolitiks of power, religion and the military as ‘idol-ogies’ of the big bang
Since the Big Bang became a canonical theory of reality during the Cold War, as a perfect ‘alibi’ for the development of the Nuclear Industry and its accelerators, still at CERN probing to repeat the Nova Big-bangs taking place on the cosmos, as if the risks involved (no more no less than the possible explosion of the planet) were just peccadilloes compared to the new knowledge it should provide on the meaning of it all. Bottom line is this: the big-bang is an absurdity, a singularity point which fits in the hand of the human scientist containing the entire Universe, never mind how, and then suddenly exploding into infinity, who knows why, with a beginning which IS PURELY A CREATIONIST THEORY, whose earlier proponent in fact, Mr. Lemaitre was a canonical priest. And so physicists thus connected directly as high popes of science with religion and both were happy – Abrahamic religions had found its ‘scientific proof that God created the Universe’ (obviously ‘someone’ must have hold that singularity in its hand, something must existed to cause it).
While Physicists were happier because before they had little prestige as their worldly profession was indeed to make weapons and entropic machines, so all encyclopedia defined physics as the ‘science of motion’ (locomotion), not as the philosophy of science, now wrongly has become. So suddenly the cosmological big-bang as absurd and false as it is, gave the entropic, weapon makers their category as supreme intelligences on planet earth. And of course the military were even happier that Shiva, not Visnu, destruction not organic creation had been the ultimate cause of the Universe… Alas, by researching new bombs as CERN does these days, we were going to answer the meaning of it all.
It had of course the virtue of being simple enough for all people to understand. God created the Universe from an infinitesimal point would say a believer. God created the Universe with a single lineal equation, V=Hod eery resembling the word God, would say the astrophysicist quoting the supposed lineal expansion of the Universe (Hubble’s constant being H here, V speed of locomotion)… And God is just a warrior exploding it all, would confirm the military man on charge of accumulating big-bang-bombs.
Now, the web is being very harsh specially with entropy physicists, ‘kicking the balls of the physical dogma’, because it is really a very religious outlook out there in astrophysicists’ congresses with the big-bang; so if there is the slightest chance for the reader to ‘react’ to his ‘beliefs’ and awe of the high priesthood of big-bang theorists, he has to be confronted right on, with the ‘religious absurdity’ and biased ‘selection of data’, which is also proper of religions. We just have moved from creationist verbal thought (God creates the universe with words, and selects them, to the point it speaks ‘only’ arab in Islam) to mathematical creationist and also a selective one (God creates the universe with maths, and selects only entropic maths:)
If anything astrophysicists are even worse than modern christians which mostly have doubts because they don’t doubt at all. They simply don’t realize they are believers not rational thinkers in what regard time arrows and how the future is webbed by information.
How the brain ‘blinds’ 1/2 of reality to them has a lot to do with the modular, psychological, memorial, repetitive structure of the brain and its ‘lineal perspective’ – the incapacity of huminds to accept multiple points of view, so we must develop also an epistemology of truth and logic which goes beyond the one-dimensional concepts of truth or false and single causality proper of huminds. Since most humans and most models of science at the larger range (where modeling and speculation is needed not only descriptive details) are filled with traps that disguise beliefs as reason…
When we take away dogma and input gravitation and galaxies it is all very simple: what galaxies emit through its black hole axis, is the ‘dark entropy scale’ below the visible c-speed world.
But it is seen NOT as faster than light speed (as time motion) but as ‘enlarged, scattering space’ (as space-distance) carrying away a high speed jet of matter: In its metric equations though is the hyperluminal perpendicular region of the ‘Kerr hole’ axis that stretches the Universe. And fantaphysicists without the proper 5D metric to justify those hyperluminal speeds in the lower scale ‘consider’ a door to another ‘parallel Universe’ (:
But it is compensated by the vacuum condensation into particles on the flat plane of those galaxies. By not measuring this Cosmologists can talk of a single arrow of entropy for the future of the Universe.
It does come then as a huge problem the problem of causality: In the big-bang and the black hole singularity, basically the same equations at work at different scales, theoreticians denied Einstein’s dictum there should be a limiting cut off substance or reality that prevented errors in the theory.
The laws of Relativity and science don’t break down in the singularity of the big-bang or black hole BECAUSE THERE IS NO SINGULARITY.
Because IT IS NOT expected in Relativity to exist SINGULARITIES, but a dense ‘real source’ and cause for the gravitation: It is ONLY because mathematicians who ARE not truly aware of physics and its realism, like Hawking and Penrose, are moving backwards equations BEYOND the very same initial conditions that are REAL – in the case of a black hole a frozen star of dense quarks that cause gravitation; in the case of the expansion of space in the Universe the central black holes that eject dark entropy through their axis.
The PROBLEM of all black hole and Big Bang singularity… mumble
is more of the same we shall say – an absurd mathematical expansion backwards in time of something we cannot even see here. NOBODY in any other science uses those mathematical creationist views that experimental evidence breaks because we want to keep doing mathematics. I.e. consider a frequency sound coming from a source, a bat, for example, if we were to return ad infinite the frequency observed with a long wavelength at a point of the air, we would reach a singularity of infinite frequency but THERE IS ALWAYS A CAUSE, A SOURCE of that wavelength, so when we reach the BAT frequency no longer increases. It is the real source.
What all THOSE BLACK HOLE ARGUMENTS LOOSE IS THE FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH of science: a cause. If there is NOT matter, not a frozen start of top quarks as Einstein wanted at the origin of the gravitational FORCE of the black hole THERE IS NO CAUSE FOR GRAVITATION. Where it comes from the awesome gravitational force of the black hole, if mass does NOT exist? if there is not as Einstein wanted a cut-off substance, which can only be the top quarks discovered after his death – with enormous mass gravitational power?
Mathematicians lwho shun off the basis of the experimental method and the physical real nature of Nature, don’t care. For them bats do NOT exist, their sound frequency is infinite. And the source is the bat ‘hole’.
In this simple balanced Universe we just need to accept the experimentally and theoretically sound hyperluminal ‘stretching’ of space coming out of those Kerr black holes. Physicists are at pains with it, because of the concept of a single ‘space-time continuum’, that of ‘light space-time’, which therefore cannot go faster than light. But in the ‘dark world of entropy between galaxies’ without hardly any ‘light background’ there restriction doesn’t apply. Since Einstein’s postulate of c-speed is limited to our electromagnetic scale. So of a series of ‘5 Dimensional scales, ruled by the simple metric S x T = K, allowed faster than c-speeds outside the ‘scale of light’, needed both in cosmology to explain the dark entropy expansion of intergalactic space, and in quantum physics to make the realist, entangled Broglie model of a quantum potential lower hyperluminal scale possible.
In more specific articles we shall deal with the mathematical aspects of quantum theory – basically a translation to ‘time o-1 unit spheres of probability’ best suited for fast, small time space entities, of the laws of the 1-∞ hyperbolic ‘present-space-body wave’ equations of thermodynamics, thoroughly equivalent in Measure theory, such as:
$t(thermodynamic statistics) ≈ §ð (quantum probabilistic mechanics)
As we show in the post on force unification, then q and g becomes: curvature (Space view) vortices (ðime view) of two scales (∆±i view) on the two upper and lower limits of @-mind perception; solving the hierarchy problem and ultimately completely opening our experimental understanding of quantum worlds, as we can see it in reverse from within as macro-galaxies. Protons then appear as top quark positive frozen stars, aka black holes; electrons as strangelet negative halos, and in between the far less dense photons become stars.
∆±¡: EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN ATOMS AND GALAXIES: UNIFICATION EQUATION OF MASSES AND CHARGES.
A fundamental theme of astrophysics in 5D metric is the solution of the Unification equation of charges and masses and the problem of hierarchy – the reader without a professional ‘egocy’ at work as a physicist should be surprised that despite our huge criticism of ‘physicists’ we are so much in loved with ‘physics’; but that is unavoidable, as we shall criticize HUMAN EGOES all the time while stressing the infinite and humble impersonal nature of the Taoist Universe…
Let us then deal with this question a bit more in depth, in the hope that perhaps there is a lot among physicists, who cares more for knowledge than egocy.
The question of scales – against constructionism.
It is difficult to stress the degree of primitivism for the intuitive perception of the cyclical space-time regions and beings of the Universe, that represents to ‘simplify’ into linearity the infinite time clocks of information of the Universe. Once this informative quality of time cycles disappears, reality which is a flow of time-space cycles, synchronized and chained to each other by organic functions disappears. And so man looses any understanding of the vital nature of the Universe, and starts to measure lineal motions as the meaning of it all. The vt=s, which has minimal information becomes then the regular form of knowledge, where the frequency and form of discontinuous time cycles disappears.
So the first conclusion we obtain from the analysis of the two new properties of space – scales, and time – 3 complex arrow to form a being, is an essential law of Nature highly contested by physicists and its ‘constructionist theory… which pretends the lowest scale is different and all others above are made with its laws.
Classic Physics believes to be the highest ‘intensive science’ because it establishes a preferential origin in the lowest scales of reality of all what existed, which should determine all other scales of size and coming together of parts, according to the same set of laws. This is contested by the fractal Universe, as all the scales have slightly different set of laws. However there is a common ‘theme’ in all of them, which are the laws of super organisms and worldcycles common to all scales, whose perfect ideal forms space and time are rather mental; that is, ideal singularity mind-mappings then imprinted by each mind-language and program of survival in the Universal scales. As Mr. Anderson pointed out: The constructionist hypothesis breaks down when confronted with the twin difficulties of scale and complexity
In the graph a classic paper on physical systems already noticed that the new ‘properties’ of space – to be scalar – and time – to have multiple complex arrows of motion and future would determine that physics is NOT the fundamental ‘stience’ – all of them are, as all follow similar but not equal detail, since a fractal in each scale is ‘similar’ but different in the details, and yet the organic fractals of nature, as the simplified mirror-mind image in the mathematical language can be all generated by an identical ‘generator equation’, which describes its parts and how the constant feed back motions and exchanges between them ‘generate’ new variations.
The galaxy is the atom of the higher scale, from the ∆o centred human point of view which perceives as much from the galaxy than the atom: ∆±3:
A such the galaxy-atom can be described as a social organism (its highest amount of information), as an astrophysical system, or as an atomic, physical form and all the perspectives will give us ∆i on the being.
As customary we shall apply the simple system of defining 10 set of isomorphic laws related to the fractal scales in space, and space-time symmetries (actions, world cycles) performed by beings on those ∆±3 scales which conform our ‘physical perception’ of the galaxy, expanding it with ‘organic’, and ‘full’ descriptions of it.
And so we can establish 2 fundamental Disomorphisms to study the whole as a series of kaleidoscopic mirrors:
-The atom-galaxy, for quantitative, mathematical physics modelling.
The concept of course has been around for long. EFE (Einstein’s field equations) applied to galaxies (Einstein-Walker formalism) is actually modelled to simplify calculus with galaxies as hydrogen atoms; Schrodinger’s equation was used by Wheeler to find a quantum formalism for the Universe; string duality considers universes and quantum strings the same; astronomers model stars around central black holes as photons, etc. But without a deep philosophical model of the fractal Universe provided in this blog, all those mathematical isomorphisms have been merely considered ‘techniques’ of calculus. The reader thus should be aware the mathematical physics – albeit complex to the level of specialists, do exist and what we shall beyond the Unification equation in Newtonian terms, introduce here is the depth of philosophical analysis and the Disomorphic properties of atomic galaxies.
-The second Ðisomorphism is that of the galaxy-cell (treated in cosmology) which shows the organic properties of astrophysical galaxies. This is to my knowledge completely new stuff, but rather obvious: DNA-black holes with gravitational forces, and protein, lineal strangelets, encase the vital space-time of electromagnetic and gravitational flows of energy between both, which structure the waves of the galaxy. And both control the mitochondria stars that become on the long term the energy food to reproduce more black holes and strange stars (pulsars). 20 years ago this seemed madness, but today everything comes together to the surprise of astronomers to validate the organic model of galactic growth:
The galaxy atom is the ‘solid’ last scale above and below perceived from the ∆º humind, at i=±3, the scale of perception of forces as pure motion or pure form in the limits of our ‘being’.
Its simpler mathematical formalism.
We shall only so how the power of 5D³ by finding the unification equation of charges and masses (general relativity) and upgrading worldlines to worldcycles (special relativity), as we have already dealt with the constancy of light speed (entanglement of electrons which emit information in relative stillness to each other).
Future, time arrows in physics are cyclical vortices of gravitation or charge or thermodynamic eddies, with a singularity of zero-motion in its center, which we do observe in thermodynamic vortices as we cannot ‘see’ inside a quark or top quark star (black hole). It is the arrow of future, as it is an attractive arrow that forms lineal entropic fields into form and will be the ‘final destiny’ of the quanta of an entropic field. We shall study for the three main scales of the supœrganism of the galaxy, which is the main physical system in which humans exist as its thermodynamic level.
Whereas the Universal Constants (G, Q), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales. Its formalism, M= ω2r3/U.C.(G,Q) is its Unification Equation.
Since if we substitute for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1st ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain Q with a 1040 higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem.
As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It also proves the isomorphism between electromagnetic atoms and galaxies, H-atoms of the cosmic scale. Since when we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and electronic orbitals star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos. Organicism gives the ‘why’ of Galacells that have DNA- + Top Quark proton holes, star mitochondria that feed them & strangelet halos.
This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:
Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)2 × radius3/ mass
If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe both, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.
And so we have an essential equivalence between K and G for the two ‘enclosure’ ∆±1 scales of human existence, the quantum faster, stronger attractive curvature=speed of the electromagnetic vortex and the slower G-VORTEX, which allow us to unify as we did previously both fields. And translate the somewhat dull language of electromagnetism to that simpler of gravitation, showing some fascinating results, such as the proton showing the schwartzschild radius, Rg = 2GM/c² equation of a black hole in the larger scale when put on gravitational jargon.
Let us go into the task, of putting some numbers to the conceptual model, completing Einstein’s work with its long seeked…
Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:
Sun mass = 2 × 1030 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10-7 rad. per sec.
Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.
Result: G=6.67 × 10 -11 kg-1 m3 rad. sec.-2
This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.
If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.
Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)
4 × 1016 rad. sec. -1 = w (electron);
5.3 × 10-11 m. (Bohr radius);
proton mass = 1.6 × 10 -27 kg.
Then we get a G, which is 2×1039 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.
And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/c2.
But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.
Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.
To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.
Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:
For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time.
He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.
So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.
What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow. Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate. Well not so immediate, it requires…
The 2 fundamental scalar vortices of time: Charges and Masses.
Let us then deduce from the previous metric, the main equations of the different world-plane constants, starting for the best known, remembering that T=1/Tƒ:
F= GmM/L² = ma
a = GM/L² GM = L³ xTƒ² where G is the constant and M the ∆-scalar magnitude, Tƒ², the dimension of cyclical time (angular acceleration) and L³ the dimension of volume.
The same equation, substituting G for Q and M for charge, as we show in the Unification Equation of charges and masses gives us the value of a charge as an ∆-scalar magnitude, when we use the Bohr model to calculate the attractive charge of the first spherical S-orbital of an electron (obviously the complexity of non-circular electronic orbitals defy this simple calculus).
Thus both M and E are the scalar magnitudes of the two upper and lower limiting world-planes of human existence, as accelerated vortices, the ‘active magnitudes’ of those 2 fields.
How does a vortex of charge and mass becomes constructed geometrically? We must understand that all systems tend to curve a |-Motion into a cyclical, finally accelerating inwards vortex: |>Ø>o. Those 3 phases of a motion will give birth to a ‘ternary structure’, the commonest of the Universe and its simplest ones are those of nature:
In the graph we can see the 3 relative topologies: as a |-Motion curves into a field, it moves inward accelerating, till it reaches the zero point, in which it will often will split its ‘formal’ and ‘energetic content:
On one side it will slow down and be perceived as a stop- mapping, in the central zero point, on the other side it will be deflected and change its dimensional direction upward as a hyperbolic tube that becomes finally a lineal flow. In physical fields, the simplest systems, it means we will find a field, which will accelerate inwards (gravitational, charge field) and then it will create a ‘less energetic’ upwards-downwards ‘gravito-magnetic’ field, completing the 3 ‘topological membranes’ of a whole system.
This field will basically have the 3 components and write with the generic equation of all fields:
A proof of the ∞ ∆-scalar nature of space-time, composed of isomorphic lineal forces of ‘spatial energy’ and cyclic, clock-time vortices of ‘informative time’, charges in the ∆-1 quantum scale, and masses in the ∆+1 cosmic scale are the recently found ”excited S-orbitals’ of the Milky Way: 2 bubbles of electromagnetic energy with the same form that ∆-1 atomic orbitals have in its excited states. The Metric of its isomorphism is the Unification Equation of Charges & Masses and its U. Constants (Q.G.).
As such the equivalence of both scales unified by a fractal simple equation rises many philosophical questions. From a point of view of astrophysical description it introduces two different perspectives over the same phenomenon: as we can see galaxies from a much larger scale, that of the human looking at the galaxy atom, and as outsiders, observing how electromagnetic energy between atoms is equivalent to dark entropy between galaxies, or we can adopt the smallish point of view as particles of a galactic star, a mere dust of space-time on the mythocondria of the gala cell. It is precisely in the description of physical systems from wildly knew perspectives what enriches the analysis of the galaxy atom in gst physics.
The guidance to advance further than present knowledge on astrophysics thanks to the insights of 5D² comes from the symmetry between the scale of atoms and galaxies, which have in 5D metric the same structure as gravitational and quantum vortex, when we apply vortex laws (either in newtonian or Einstein’s formalism – we use here for the sake of simplicity the Newton’s vortex from where via Poisson’s potential Einstein derived his work; so NEWTON is also valid when there is no need for great accuracy).
II. SOCIO-BIOLOGIC STIENCES.
I-MAN: AGES, TOPOLOGY AND ACTIONS THROUGH PLANES OF EXISTENCE.
MAN AS A 5D TIME§PAŒRGANISM
We have introduced the physical system and its functions of ‘existence’, that is, its organization in space and time, as a super organism and a world cycle. Let us then now consider the human being also as a vital space the lives a world cycle of time, in the context of a Universe made of ∞ such beings. Of course, to cast man on the same view that an atom, a galaxy or a bug is a taboo of the ego paradox that make us believe to be the center of the Universe.
But that is what we are. So as we just introduced the human being as a system of 3 elements, entropic limbs, reproductive bodies and informative singularity-minds, comparing it to two other ‘varieties’ of space-time organism, we shall now introduce our existence in finite time also in parallel to all those other beings that follow the same space-time cycle.
Again the resistance to accept this ‘fact’ of nature is likely unassailable to reason, as the emotional fear of death which humans can surpass objectively with Buddhist understanding of extinction and the non-ego existence or inversely subjectively with the runaway myths of anthropomorphic religions that make you happy. This being the ‘final solution’ of human cultures – to invent happy myths that pass as science through the process of half-truths and ceteris paribus analysis – we hold no hope for understanding.
But being this web on ‘objective philosophy of science’, we cannot but advice the reader to ditch out his ego and find a different kind of more mature happiness – that of Nirvana, the dissolution in the whole as equal to us, part of the entangled organic Universe. Since we live and die like all other spacetime beings.
Medicine & Physiology deal with the 3 networks of the human organism, whose functions connected to the senses enact our time arrows: The Digestive, Energetic System is attached to the senses of smell and taste; the hormonal, blood, reproductive system is attached to the senses of touch and the 6th, emotional sense and the Nervous, Informative System is attached to the higher senses of sight and sound.
The arrows of time and social scales of human beings.
The most enlightening analysis of Multiple Spaces-Times is the objective evaluation of human beings, as yet another fractal part of the Universe, in communion with its cycles of existence and organic isomorphisms: As all other living organisms, we humans have 2 poles of Entropy and information, of cyclical and lineal form, the body and the head; we live through 3±i ages of d=evolution between birth in the lower cellular plane and death back to it. We are defined by 3 fractal regions, a sensorial membrane, a central spine and our lineal energetic limbs and digestive organs. All those systems are born through palingenetic processes from the same 3 fetus’ membranes, the endoderm, the mesoderm and the exoderm.
We have 2 subspecies clearly specialized in Entropy and information, the lineal, strong male; the perceptive, memorial, cyclical woman. We are also dominated by the reproductive arrow, dominant in life species, as all what we really care for is our families. We like so much reproduction that we are actually transferring our form into metal, making machines of Entropy (transport, weapons) and information that imitate our senses (chips=brains, cameras=eyes and mobiles=ears)…
Thus, man is also a biological knot of existential cycles, whose purpose as everything else in the Universe is to ‘survive’, to maintain the immortality of the human, logic form by reproducing the Entropy and information absorbed by the brain/body system and to ‘evolve’ – to create more complex social organisms of history till reaching the summit of evolution as a species: the creation of a superorganism called mankind, in which humans share Entropy and information through its collective energetic systems (economy) and informative systems (political and cultural structures).
We cannot overextend in the biological description of the human being, which is topologically similar to all other life species. Let us briefly consider those self-similarities:
-Man extends through 3 planes of increasing complexity, the cellular, bio-chemical plane, the individual, biological plane, and the social plane.
-st-1: As cellular beings we are also defined by an iterating language of information, written with 4 dimensions, the DNA bases that form the genetic code. Thus, the cellular plane is ruled by genes, which mostly code the basic functions of the cell and organs, common to all mammals, reasons why we have over 90% of common genes with them.
– We also evolve through a palingenetic process, differentiated only in the last 5 million of years from self-similar apes.
-st level: Humans have also 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive; reproductive=blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems common to all life species. Those internal networks observe the external Universe through the same 6 senses of all other species.
Indeed, if the duality of bodies/heads gives birth to the Complementarity principles of Physics and genre, the existence of a series of basic wills are expressed in our human organism through the senses – our outlets to the Entropy and information of the body and brain. We use those senses to absorb different energies and information and combine both, in reproductive processes. We sense sexual reproduction of the body through touch; we smell the energetic food we eat, and that information used to guide hunters. And finally we taste that Entropy. While our brain perceives space with our eyes, reproduces information with words, and uses the 6th sense of feelings and the limbic brain to guide our reproductive body. Thus the senses are:
– The sense of smell and taste are the negative and positive senses of the digestive system that allow us to choose what to reject and what to eat. The language of the sense of taste has also 5 vowels that can be classified according to the key substances of Entropy and information (sugars, proteins, salt, etc.) our organism require.
– The internal 6th sense of feelings that relate body and brain and the external sense of touch are responsible for the reproductive will, which excites our mind (love) and our body (sexual attraction). Both are reinforced, as in all other animals by the visual and auditory sense, which are the:
– Mental senses of space (eyes) and time (words), which shape our natural languages of energetic and informative perception.
In the graph we observe that man as an individual is a knot of 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive, reproductive= blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems.
St+1: When humans perform those individual actions in social groups they create social networks that establish the ‘memetic actions’ or customs of a society, passed from generation to generation as ‘genetic codes’ are transferred from individual to individual. So humans gather in groups to harvest food and eat together; they establish social customs and marry to reproduce; and develop verbal and visual, informative networks that evolve human organisms from individuals into cultural super-organisms, transcending socially into a new st+1 plane of existence: Mankind.
Thus, while we are ruled by the will of our 3 physiological systems, expressed through our biological genes, we evolve socially into macro-organisms called Gods, nations and civilizations, expressed by our cultural and technological memes.
EVOLUTION OF MAN: TERNARY SPECIES – ANTHROPOLOGY – GENDER STUDIES
The evolution of man: Ternary differentiations.
Complexity defines a Ternary game of evolution by differentiating species in informative and energetic species, combined in balanced organisms. The same game evolved man from the original ape 5 million ago into the human being. Moreover the differentiation is established first from an initial top, predatory, young energetic species (the gorilla in the human case), that diverts into a reproductive, mature species (the chimp bonobo) and finally in its 3rd informative age gives birth to a more mental species (the Australopithecus). This thesis of multiple spaces-times first established in the foundational book of this science 20 years ago, was confirmed with the discovery of the exact genetic clock: the divergence between gorillas and chimpanzees is 1.17, then the genetic clock diverges 1.17 to create man… Thus the same plan of evolution, which we used to describe all other biological species of the Universe created man from Mr. Ape.
Moreover, the Universe has 3±i arrows/dimensions of creation, energetic length, informative height and balanced=symmetric, bilateral reproductive width. This simple dimensional game happens even in man. Yet bilateral systems often are also dual: one side is slightly Entropy dominant and the other slightly informative, offering a more complex, kaleidoscopic higher truth (multiple p.o.v.s). It is also a sexual principle: Women are information-dominant; males are Entropy dominant. And it should find wider applications to understand the dualities of the brain.
Such topological analysis confirms our informative nature:
In human evolution the ternary principle applies beyond the triad of apes: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex=informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher Entropy x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energetic top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they learned to control complex motion in the dimension of informative height, adding a 3rd spatial dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species.
In the graph we study the ternary process responsible for the creation of humanity: Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between Entropy and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±i horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.
And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in Entropy (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, Entropy and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.
Thus from an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:
— Max. $t: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.
— $t=§ð: The chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the Pan Paniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes. It is:
— Max.§ð: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:
I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.
We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago are:
— Max. $t: The Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is the Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.
— $t=§ð. The Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa as a contemporary of the Paranthropus.
— Max.§ð: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is the form, which holds more information in lesser space.
Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative Homos. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favored their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:
— Max. $t: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.
— $t=§ð: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.
— Max.§ð. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.
II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens.
That Homo Ergaster, after a massive age of reproduction and expansion throughout the planet, subdivides again in 3 sub-races of Homo Erectus.
— Max.$t: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.
— $t=§ð: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.
— Max.§ð: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black Hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered3, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.
Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopatric evolution). Thus, he adds now technological Entropy weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new Entropy/information duality:
The energetic, big Neanderthal and the informative Bushman, which combine again to give birth to multiple races.
Those predictions based in the ternary principle and the Black Hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) have been confirmed by genetic maps and Paleontology and await final confirmation when new skulls of Floresiensis are found.
The 3rd, informative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.
— The lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.
— A second informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman, the mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.
± 80.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).
± 40.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the Capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced $t=§ð, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.
The axis of the mind. The paradox of the ego. The creationist fundamentalist humind…
In the graph, it is unfortunate, and latter explained from within the ternary main languages of the humind, its axis and type of cultures (lineal, visual, in white, dolichocephalic men; cyclical, verbal in mongoloids with higher brachycephalic verbal axis; sensorial psylocephalic in black men, dominant in the height, sensorial/motor axis) that the ‘simpler’ of the 3 cultures of mind, the visual, lineal e-vident ‘Neanderthal, white’ brain and its worldview have come to dominate history. Because we have lost indeed a proper understanding of the complex organic Universe that eastern taoist and buddhist cultures were clearly reaching in the age of verbal thought.
But those axis, perpendicular to each other, connected to the 3 basic dual senses to get a ‘scanning mapping’ in verbal (ears), visual (eyes), chemical (Nose) axis that connect our ’rounded’ head to the world, EXIST ALSO IN ANY particle, also spherical, with 3 spin positions- another monad/non-euclidean world.
And so what is then the 4th and 5th dimension of the mind?
And so what is then the 4th and 5th dimension of the mind?
The answer is in the 5TH HOLE OF THE HEAD, the mouth that feeds and kills into entropy other beings, but also TALKS the verbal, informative language to connect with other social beings.
So we SHALL FIND FOR EACH PARTICLE-HEAD the 5 Dimotions of existence in the form of apertures to the world and build in physiology and biology and physics the proper paradigm on how the being interacts through those 3±∆ apertures with reality. And of course connect the cultures of mankind with its specific mind views.
Science is culture and culture is also a product of the space-time axis of the mind. So we are stuck with the visual white-neanderthal dominant culture. But if the organic culture is closer to reality, why the visual culture has dominated? The answer is deeper and as usual disturbing for the human ego: because the lineal, entropic, military weapons of ‘western physicists’ have destroyed all other cultures. But the arrow of destruction and death of GAIA is NOT a positive proof of human power as we are WITHIN GAIA and we shall perish or become substituted by the organic robotic weapons we are building to dominate the Universe in a delirium tremens of an infinitesimal being who thinks his ego to be infinite.
We want thus to introduce a recurrent theme of all our objective scientific studies of mankind – the paradox of the ego, which is natural to the structure of informative singularities that measure reality from the stillness and perspective of its mind-language that is self-centered. Humans are not exception also in this fact illustrated in the graph.
And so because we see and select information from our selfish perspective, we cannot give objective organic properties to reality.
The complete failure of humans to understand the absolute relativity of 5th dimensional scales and the living nature of the Universe is in that sense a natural, ’emotional’, subjective trait that objective scientists should always take into account when considering ANY pretentious theory of reality.
It is thought quite an impossible task to upgrade mankind to the objective organic Universe. If you point out to the limits of the ego the ego gets offended – it acts as the bottom line or a priori ‘falsehood’ needed for the ‘discontinuous T.œ’ to see ‘himself’ as the center of an ‘it’ world it will try to ab=use. In as much as we want to survive by extruding energy and information from other beings, we must despise them. And we do. Objective science has always been a lonely fight against this truism of a fractal Universe broken into infinite beings.
The solution is not of course, what humans today think is science – the praxis of power of constructing big machines and control the world with it. Technology is NOT science but power. It is for that reason that the true summit of science, the philosophy of the organic Universe has NEVER become mainstream except perhaps in the most informative, verbal, ‘brachycephalic’ eastern cultures in an age of lesser technology. and more respect for the infinite cycles of the living Universe.
Today the ‘homunculus’ has so many machines, paradoxically evolving into organisms, but still ‘obeying us’ as attached organs off energy and information, making us ‘animetals’, ensembles of two type of atoms that empower us, that it rejects even in larger measure the obvious organic vital nature of all beings including machines, and the non-preferential position of man not only in space and time (evolution) but in scale.
Of course there are always sages and exceptions, for which those texts…
But the Homunculus has a quality which IS ESSENTIAL TO THEIR NATURE – TO have reached the zenith of carbolife evolution starting the evolution by transfer of form to a more complex atom, metal of its organs and topologies – namely the creation of the industrial r=evolution which can also be studied with organic laws.
Finally the eco(comic)system of company-mothers of machines also show the 3 parts of a machine as dominant in the 3 ages of evolution of the machines which now collapse into a new form of organic life, the robot – so much for mechanical models of the Universe, as machines are merely primitive organisms of metal, in the same manner physicists who make those machines and measure the Universe with them, are primitive philosophers of time, simplified by those machines:
MANKIND IN TIME AND SPACE: THE 3 EARTHS – SOCIAL SCIENCES
The definition of mankind follows as the ∆+1 super organism of humanity, which in time IS history, whose existence as a ‘block’ of time must be inscribed within the evolution of information of Mother Earth:
Gaia (life-relative past) Metal-earth: Financial-media (informative machines) /military-industrial (motion-entropy machines) System:
The equation of the 3 ages of Earth is a canonical equation of evolution of a super organism towards higher degrees of information as light was first in Gaia, energy of plants, in animal life, information for the eyes, and in machines will be both, in robots with solar skins and AI, 5G networks, which will form the collective brain of the metal-earth:
The 3 planes of Human Existence in time.
Life is a trip through 3 planes of existence: the biologic, st-1 genetic plane; the individual plane, which expresses the same biological arrows, and the sociological st+1 memetic plane, where survival is reserved to prophets that create a religious God or civilization, the subconscious collective of millions of believers. In the graph, existence is a travel between those 3 planes, the cellular plane to which we return after death, the individual plane and the social plane which peaks in our 3rd age as informative particles of our culture and economic ecosystem.
If we study the human being in time, the 3 ages of human beings are equivalent to the 3 ages of any space-time field. Humans show those self-similarities, both in the physical ‘warping’ of their bodies that accumulate information and wrinkle till they explode back into Entropy in the process of death; and in the different ‘ways of thought’ of their brain that also go from an optimistic, active age of Entropy into a reflective, old age of information:
-St-1: we are born in the inferior cellular scale as a seminal seed, clearly differentiated in lineal energetic males of maximal motion and still, reproductive, informative females, ovum, that mix together, exo to start a palingenetic process of reproduction and social evolution till we surface in the st-scale.
– Max. $t: Youth is the Entropy age, dominated by the digestive network and muscular movement. So children are energetic, always moving, passionate about food that they need in bigger quantities.
-ST: Maturity is dominated by the reproductive arrow, its networks and sexual desire. So mature people marry and have family values.
– Max. ð§: The old age is dominated by information and nervous networks. So old people are wise and know a lot of things, though they have little Entropy left and live in stillness, looking back to the past, before they truly start their travel in time. Thus, a very old man becomes like a reversed, negative child, also passionate about food since he lacks Entropy; but can’t really digest it. He will be emotional, close to his ‘biological consciousness’, but with negative feelings, as he has no future left… except death, when his information dissolves back to the cellular plane.
– << st-1: Death, when all Entropy is spent we die and return back in time through a 4th age in which all information becomes erased.
Further on, humans transit during those 3±i ages of life through 3±i hierarchical scales or planes of existence: the st-individual plane; the st-1, biological scale and the 3±i, historic, sociological scale. In terms of those scales of space-time, life is a temporal journey from the lower st-1 biological plane in which we are born as seminal cells into the human plane in which we enter through the discontinuous aperture of our mothers’ biological wombs. Then humans will ‘mature’ in that st-social plane after the ‘rituals of initiation’ proper of all adolescents in all societies, which make us cross ‘the discontinuity’ between youth and maturity.
In that social plane humans will live as individual members of their society during maturity, till in the 3rd age the mind will return back to the mental level of childhood; while the spatial body will continue warping up.
Thus in the 3rd age, the st-mind and E-body suffer a ‘fractal split’ that breaks i=ts S=T harmony (‘mens sana in corpore sanum’), which determines survival, causing the death of the organism. Then through death, the human being will descend back again to the biological, cellular world.
Thus life is a motion back and forth in time that starts with our palingenetic conception in the st-1 biological plane of seminal cells. The graph shows that ternary existence in which the main age is maturity, when humans form part of an organic system as a cell of a nation or culture, in the st+1 plane, enacting social and informative cycles with other fractal citizens or believers, as our senses open up to the social ecosystem, ruled by the political isomorphisms and financial networks of the collective, nervous social system, where we develop verbal and visual perception, till we descend back through the reverse journey of death into the original st-1 cellular, vegetative state, completing our wheel=cycle of existence.
Though we have only ‘individual consciousness’, the 3±i biological and sociological planes do exist and should have their own individual consciousness (DNA consciousness, and collective subconscious of mystique Gods). When we are born we just enter a new form of consciousness after an age dominated by our vegetative, chemical, cellular soul. A fact, which is evident in the ‘borders’ of life: the baby and the old man care mainly for food and chemical emotions, since they are closer to their cellular level of birth and death, our zero sum as dust of space-time.
Recap. Humans follow the same 3±i ages of all biological beings, as they live through 3 planes of existence: the biological, individual and sociological planes.
Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scale of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales.Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us.
In the graph, Science is the reflection of the species of the Universe by the still linguistic mirrors-images of humanity. It follows that stiences are the upgraded version of those mirror-images which add the understanding of the 5 Ðimotions from multiple points of view on the entangled Universe (Rashomon’s truths); and the more complex temporal pentagonal logic (¬Aristotelian logic) and fractal space (Non-Euclidean mathematics) derived of the more complex understanding of the ultimate elements of all systems, its vital spaces and world cycles of temporary existence.
Thus the formalism of the fractal ∆§t±¡ universe is non-A and Non-E, hence, the next letter, i. We shall call this upgrading of the humind, i-logic Geometry and ¬Ælgebra (existential Algebra), the 2 most used terms to describe the topo-logic structure of a Universe of fractal spaces and temporal energy. Existential Algebra is my favorite term, for all what has to do with the symbolic equations of non-Æ, i-logic geometry. So those are the wor(l)ds of most often used. ¬Æ, the best abbreviation.
The equations of ¬Æ are those of Dimotions of time§paces.
For example, V=s/t is a ¬Æ equation, which we must interpret better in terms of Ðimotions as:
Constant lineal inertia (motion) = $(λ) x ƒð = K
A case of the most general Metric of all possible time space demotions, ‘SxT’=K.
How many times of equation of Ðimotions of space-time there are, how much are related to the fractal generator, as all of them are sub-cases of the generator, how to connect them with the equation and laws of each science is the formalism of the stience of exist¡ences.
Let us then now that we have a very basic understanding of the ternary topological elements of a given en space-time plane ($t§ð), and its two ‘perpendicular, past to future, entropic and informative dimensions’ give you a ‘prime’ on that new outlook we insist uses all the data and accurate equations of classic science.
In the graph we can see it in a human being with the ‘symbolic equations of i-logic’:
In the graph below we have written with simple symbols of entropy life arrows, and iteration ≈≥, the ternary structure of man in space as a system of organs attached to 3 physiological networks – entropic limbs of motion, reproductive body and informative head; and its ages of time in which each of those networks dominate the whole structure between its emergence from the lower scale of cellular existence as a full being to its entropic death back to cellular and molecular states. So yes, indeed the same ‘Ðisomorphic laws’, derived from the cyclical fractal nature of ðimespace organisms allow us to explain the whys of galaxies, humans and social organisms.
In the graph, a summary of the scales and structure in ‘space’ and ‘time’ of all systems of the Universe. All of them will exist across 3 ∑i±1 scales of social organization, in which they will form an i-ndividual, joined by networks of energy information and reproduction, living a world cycle from birth to extinction across those scales as they ‘exist’, as systems of energy and information, made of ‘energy limbs/fields’, informative particles/heads and its body-wave combinations. Thus all systems will be born in the i-1 seminal scale, grow in size, emerge into and i-ndividual scale, in which they will increase information and reduce energy, from youth – the age of energy to adulthood, the age of balance, to the 3rd informative age, to die back to the cellular scale. And what differs from species are the specific particularities of each scale. What complex sciences does is to lay out the self-similar laws in space (topologies) and time (ages and states) of those systems as they trace their ‘world life cycle’ traveling through those i±1 scales.
Indeed, the third ‘great discipline’ of sciences, bio-social sciences, Anthropology, Medicine, History and economics can also be explained with those laws:
In the right side we do show also hidden on the artistic images of the super organism of greek, during the 800 years cycle of iron, infantry cultures, the 3 ages of life of the super organism of Greece, whose subconscious collective, art, mimics in its 3 mental ages, parallel to those of an individual, a young, simple dramatic age of kouroi warriors, a classic reproductive balanced age of art and sensorial pleasures, and a 3rd baroque, warped, angst age before the death of Greek civilizations to war, the germs that kill by excess of technological evolution the super organisms of history.
And then when you observe them in the ∆-¡ ‘small scales of time’ you obtain the 5 Actions of existence. And when you see it from the ∆+¡ scale of the world in which the super organism is a mere atom/cell/citizen you observe full time§pace cycles of a micro-being running through its s-paces, enslaving for the larger being.
THE FRACTAL GENERATOR OF SPACETIME ORGANISMS.
It is obvious that to express the COMMON laws of all systems according to its relative scales, we need an entire new jargon and a general upgrading of the laws derived of the structure of space and time, which is ginormous, because they come in all systems.
This is the purpose of the non-euclidean, non-aristotleian i-logic geometry in which fractal space and cyclical time is ‘written’ (as I comes after A and E) and the simple new symbols of a I-logic and its ‘fractal generator’, that is the set of I-logic equations that define the behavior of all systems of the Universe according to the laws of its 5 Dimotions of time-space, which are the same when we ‘are void of details’; and self-center our perspective in a given point of view or T.œ.
Let us then run in its simplest mode the Fractal Generator. And define it for all..
>: ƒuture informative implosion <: past expansive dissolution; ≤≈≥: present iteration <<: entropic death. §,$,∑e,S,∫: 5 Space dimensions. ð,t,∏¡,∂,T: 5 Time motions
5 actions: a-cceleration; e-ntropic, energy feeding; i–nformative gauging; o-ffspring reproduction; social evolution into u-niversals: ∑∏ (i<ao>u):$p≥exi≥ðƒ<<$p
A Fractal Generator is a feed-back equation, which in simple terms explains the minimal elements needed to ‘generate’ by iteration, a complex mathematical system. A living fractal is the same concept, only that the ‘5 elements of the generator’ are its dimotions of time-space.
It follows that from this more general fractal generator, all time-space beings, composed of those 5 dimotions, can be generated.
The purpose of this paragraph is to describe the ‘ternary fractal generator of space-time superorganisms’ with the jargon of Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean ‘I-logic geometry‘, the upgraded formalism of logic and mathematics needed to describe a ‘vital, fractal Universe’.
We concluded that to fully understand reality we must upgrade and reorder our view of simultaneous space, which is ternary in its adjacent topologies that form simultaneous superorganisms, and sequential time, which is cyclical, and broken in infinite time clocks.
To that aim we found a 5th Dimension of scalar space-time, in which systems remain co-invariant, as they accelerate its time clocks, when they become smaller: $p x ðƒ = K. This is the mathematical (Klein) definition of a dimension of space-time that allows to travel through it as we slow down and grow in size, through the world cycle of life and death.
We found the reason for that metric in the internal co-ordination of the parts of a larger system, which slow down its external, measurable synchronous clock as a whole. So larger wholes have more internal structure that diminish its speed as a whole.
So the simplest Generator equation of reality would be the 5D metric equation in its spatial ‘still image’: $p x ðƒ = K.
We can then write it through the constant increase of information of system with the symbols of > involution of information and < expansion of lineal spacetime and dissolution of information, as a series of actions that ad on to a worldcycle:
$p > e x i > ðƒ << $p, whereas $p means a relative lineal past of maximal extension in Space and minimal information, energy x information, the balanced classic age of reproduction, ðƒ, the third future age of increasing information, which in the moment of entropic death, <<, implies a massive erasing of information and growth of entropy, and dissolution of the structures of the system.
Finally we can add to this simplest expression of the generator, its ternary symmetries in ‘scales’ of size (¡±1), as we are born in an ∆-1 seminal scale, emerge in our ∆o individual scale where we interact with an ∆+1 social world, to dive back in the moment of death to the ∆-1 plane.
And we can also extend the ∑e x ∏ i, present, intermediate state of maximal balance, in the emergent ∆ø scale, with the 3 topologies of space (|xO≈Ø) that defines the 3 adjacent topological parts of all organisms, |-moving limbs/potentials O-informative particle/heads.
So we obtain a quite descriptive generator equation of all T.œs in time, space and scale, through its worldcycle between seminal birth and entropic death, without the need for the more formal Ðisomorphisms of timespace:
Γ.œ ≈ ∆œ-1 (seed): ∑œ-1>∆ø: |-$p > Øei > O- ðƒ << ∆-1: $p
The reader then should assess the interest of learning the simple symbols of ¬Æ to be able to write ‘general laws’ that apply to all relative ∆±¡ planes of reality.
In the next graph and following paragraphs we try to explain those equations as simple as they get – since truly ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’.
The complex view of the fractal generator.
While the intuitive $p ðƒ, symbolism is of great use for simplified synoptic studies of the general properties of Scalar, fractal, cyclical timespace, for more detailed analysis as those classic science thus, is of more use a rigorous definition of the 5 Demotions with different symbols, related to the multiple operandi that make up reality in its dynamic interactions.
Indeed, the extraordinary beauty of T.œ, a Theory of the Organic Everything is in the still ongoing research by this fractal point-humind of the connections between the general laws of timespace organisms and the enormous details of all sciences, established with different jargons:
To unify all those jargons and extract with I-logic arguments all the equations of all the sciences of reality from the simplest facts developed in our ‘treatise’ on the Universe in a nutshell, without loosing its ‘deep history of timespace dimotions’, is the task of stience, which I have carried alone in and out for decades with marvelous results and ‘insights’ on future developments of all sciences that have been falling into place.
So for me the model IS no doubt of it, the proper philosophy of science of the Universe. For the skeptic reader however it will likely not be, because 1) it is a new jargon and he has his own; so it is not going back to school 2) anthropomorphism denies common vital properties to other species 3) the author lacks authoritas, as all pioneers. 4) we live in a visual, analytic, computer-based ‘mathematical-only’ world and most humans are loosing fast all verbal-logic skills to the point most of them will find these texts ‘nebulous’ because verbal, logic thought is out of his ‘world picture’.
Never mind. If hominids don’t get it, robominds will and if none does and we go under, the satisfaction within my mind happened ‘still’.
Let us then start with a brief resume taken from other posts of the Universe, as it is, when described with the new properties of topological ternary space, ternary scales and ternary time ages.
So the 5 Dimotions that create the form and function of all systems and its parts, between its generation by a mind-seed and extinction in entropic explosions are:
- Ði: Informative particles/heads: §ð
- Ð: limbs/potentials: momentum: st.
- Ð: ∑e x ∏i: body waves: ∑∏.
- Ðimotion: entropy: S∂: ∆+1<<∆-1
- Ðimotion: Organic evolution: ∫T: ∆-1>∆o
Where < is a symbol of growth of motion and so < a symbol of the growth of information.
We shall latter explain why we chose all those symbols and develop the non-Aristotelian non-Euclidean formalism in logic and mathematics that describe all time-space organisms.
Enough to say at this stage that And we can write with those simple symbols, a series of Fractal generator equations to describe all T.Œs, both in space as super organisms and in time as world cycles of existence. For example, the Fractal Generator of all systems of nature can be written as:
∆-1: ∫T>∆o: $t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) §ð (particle-heads)<<∆-1: S∂ (death)
The extraordinary simplicity and beauty of the Universe and all its parts made to its image and likeness is the simplicity of it all, and its ‘Disomorphic nature’, that is the fact all systems follow those laws.
The 2 jargons of this blog: simpler logic and complex operandi views.
So we are now becoming ‘inflationary’ as all mind languages are, establishing 2 ‘models of I-logic thought’, a simpler more intuitive way of writing the Generator equation, which introduces common terms of classic science and uses the simpler terms we define for the Metic 5D equation will be then:
$p > E x I > ðƒ
Whereas a limb/potential dimotion system, $p, will be the simplest lineal distance-motion that will evolve as energy (maximal size, minimal form) and information (maximal form, minimal size), in a second body-wave age, E x I, before it be=comes curved into an informative particle-head or singularity, ðƒ.
In that sense the concepts of common use, ‘energy and information’, require a conceptual upgrading, as both merge and come together into body-waves, increasingly becoming transformed one into the other in the vital cycles of the body wave, whose ‘power’ is maximal when E= I -> Max. E x I.
And the complex view that first introduces some of the key operandi that will become fundamental to translate mathematical science into T.œ.
In the more complex model for example, the third reproductive demotion of a system, e x i, can be viewed as the merging of two different realities, lineal, entropic motion, and cyclical, informative stillness, limbs and minds that merge into the combined e x i: ∑ ∏, body-wave. Energy herds though can be easily ad up by superposition (∑). Thus we obtain in the complex model the proper operandi that will be essential to the study of quantitative body-waves.
So body-waves herds of energy are simpler than in-form-ative elements, which tend to form more complex networks, with internal connections through its ‘body-parts’, so we use the multiplicative symbol. Information then in any ‘confined’ system, such as T.œs surrounded by membranes are, tend to be dominated by the informative element and its networks.
Same happens with the more complex 4th and 5th dimotions of entropy and social evolution, which we write with the 2 fundamental operations of analysis that are the best way to study those dimotions, ∂S and ∫T.
And this has very important consequences, for the long term existence of the being.
Indeed; what is the ‘sum of all the Dimotions of the being; through its existence’?
Simply speaking the worldcycle of existence of the being between ‘birth=generation’ and extinction:
This simple ‘first views’ on how to combine the 5 dimotions of reality shows truly the real way in which the Universe becomes complex: by combinatorics, which indeed increase ginormously the number of variations and permutations even with a few elements.
Combinatorics with its latter ad ons of spatial statistics and temporal probability are for that reason an essential field of the ‘mirror-language’ of mathematics that so well ‘summarizes’ the laws of T.œ,when we fully understand mathematics as what it is not an axiomatic but an experi≈mental stience, that is a mental mirror of reality more efficient and better fit to the task that the ambiguous words (more subtle though to understand fully the entangled connections as its words are branching into sub-texts), similar to the visual direct view from where both depart.
THE BIOTOPOLOGIC PROPERTIES OF ∆§T beings REFLECTED IN MIRROR-LANGUAGES.
Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fractal point=world of space-time.
‘I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’ Einstein
In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin->European->Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and the description are the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best.
So only organicism is real in the whole sense of the Universe, while languages-mirrors are local orders.
The EGOCY of our present, entropic age of human civilization rejects this (Precisely because it is becoming dissolved). So we reject the power of networks – self-mademan myths and tribalism in history. Yet networks are more powerful and survive.
How this work on languages IS OBVIOUS: LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:
In the graph, which I re-designed from” road to irreality” (: a work by Penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician along his friend Hawking, which shuns off the laws of the experimental method) his view of reality is VOID as in all PLATONIC (PLATO by the way never said that, they should be called Pythagorean, a much more primitive ‘magic view’) of HARDWARE MINDS and LOCALITY. In his view the Language creates the Universe.
In reality the Universe is a fractal organism, and as all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘Space-time’, which are Organic because that is the main property of co-existence in different planes (∆§cales), topological because that is the main property of Spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and Logic, Multicausal, as that is the main property of the dimotions of time.
So the ultimate causality ∆->T->S IS not Platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties -> T-Logic properties -> S-Topologic, mathematical properties.
In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘Social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the Universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we REPEAT, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆-scalar properties, STopo-logic ONES.
SO WE ADAPT PENROSE GRAPh to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:
The ∆§T BioTopoLogic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking self-similar. And then THE LANGUAGES REINFORCE AS MIRRORS EXPANDED INTO REALITY those properties ordering local territories.
So the graph shows that back and forth to adequate to how REALITY IS created LOCALLY by ‘minds‘, which are the language software on the hardware brains of T.œs, ONLY after the language reflects the LIVING cycles (dimotions) of all time-space beings with those properties:
You can see in the graph how it works: First the whole Universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak ONLY THE TERRITORY OF ‘ARISTOTELIAN’ ORDER OR BODYWAVE ENERGY OF THE SYSTEM…
THE DRAWING in original Penrose ONLY had the mind ordering the Universe, as the source and only God in Aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (body-wave) around it’.
So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is AS IN CRYSTALS ABLE TO FORM mirror-images in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or dimotions) are the language of it all:
Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.
So THE QUESTION HERE IS WHICH LANGUAGES ARE THE MOST EFFICIENT OF THE UNIVERSE? BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THERE WILL BE A PROCESS OF SELECTION OF SPECIES ACCORDING TO THE QUALITY OF ITS LANGUAGES:
Let us then consider a first sight to the two huge fields of human experimental stiences which along the understanding of the languages-mirrors the humind applies to perceive them (from maths to wor(l)ds to images and art) complete the whole view of reality. It is customary to divide those stiences in 3 – biological, socioeconomic and physical systems.
But we do advance a fact that will put ill at ease many readers but it is a ‘fact’ of the Universe: social stiences ARE biological sub disciplines, where memes have the role of genes and follow very similar laws, nations and civilization are super organisms of human citizen-cells and machines are evolving organisms of meta life, re=produced by company-mothers, themselves part of the super organism of Gaia, evolving rom life to history to the metal-earth…
So in ∆ST, the 3 huge fields of inquire are Physical systems, socio-biological systems and mental languages, which given the duality of mirrors of creation (still software languages that embodied the will of the Universe) and territories of local order (body waves in which the particle/head/still language orders), requires an entire field of understanding of its own.
Let us then consider the 3 main disciplines of ∆ST in a series of introductory notes.
And of those stiences it follows suit that the most important would be History and economics, which build the super organism of mankind and machines on Earth and rightly understood should try to build a perfect world following laws akin to those of medicine that tries to cure the sicknesses of the physiological networks of individuals, in the case of social stiences of mankind.
The importance of languages and minds.
It follows from all this that science will NEVER access the whys of reality because in the restricted, reductionist method of doing science, imposed by physicists in the earlier ages, when God was the ‘why’ of things that needed not to be explored, some key elements of reality, mostly its fractal scales and the mind-mirrors ORIGIN OF THOSE SCALES, have disappeared. So goes for the program or will of existence encoded in those minds.
Languages as informative mirrors of reality are studied in the second line of the blog. They ultimately all respond to a simple I-logic equation: ∆ð≥§@. That is flows of cyclical motions of time, ‘stop’ in a mind ‘singularity’ §@, of pure form, which compresses by eliminating dimotions (dimensions of form) of reality as you do observing a still, holographic Universe on your small mind. And latter we will work on those mind equations, mirrors of the Universe, which in the mathematical mirror would be defined by the simple equation that includes them all:
O-Mind singularity (linguistic still spatial mirror) x ∞ Universal time cycles = K (o x ∞ = K), where K is any Constant world mirror.
But let us try to keep some ‘order’ within the astounding kaleidoscopic Universe. To that aim we use here two basic methods of observance of reality:
- The ‘Rashomon effect’ (a truth in the Japanese classic needs 5 points of view; so this mean ANY way to EXPRESS the 5 Demotions of time space, and ALL together, build the basic information of the being). And so we constantly bring the “Rashomon truths’ of a being – its logic description of its 5 dimotions in all its different effects.
- The Disomorphic method, which basically ‘doubles’ the elements we study as we combine ‘space-like view’ of those dimotions as dimensions of form and ‘time-like views’ of the dimotions as motions of space, analyzing both function=form.
In both cases the key concept is a ‘Ðisomorphism’ – an isomorphic, ‘equal form;’ that is equal law of stience, an spacetime element, time motion or space form, which varies in detail but is common to all beings – from the singularity particle-head (the form of the informative dimotion), to the body-wave (the form of the reproductive dimotion) and the limb-potential (the form of the locomotion), which all have, and respond to similar topologies. For example, there are infinite variations of heads and particles but ALL are spherical because the sphere is the topology that stores more information in lesser space, so the BEST SURVIVAL strategy for a head-particle that must have relative stillness to focus motion into form, hence becomes easy to prey, is to be spherical, small, not-perceivable easily to survive.
So most of those texts after considering some law of timespaces apply a Rashomon method to consider how that law or element entangles with the other 4 elements/dimotions.
While to fully describe with a ‘methodical way’ any entity of reality we shall use the Disomorphic method, which basically explains the existence of a being, from birth to extinction as it grows, emerges in an upper scale of the fifth dimension, lives through its ternary organs, as part of a larger world and then dies… away in an explosion of entropy.
Why humans do not understand the living Universe, if it is so simple and beautiful? The answer is egocy: ego+idiocy, and both come closer. The consequences are dare: an ill-designed world, which humans are killing ‘fast’.
We have now the bare minimum concept of what is ‘fractal space and cyclical time’ and how it relates to the main laws of physics and science. It is now time to stress the very simple concept of all realities:
“We are all ternary spacetime beings, composed of 3 ‘adjacent topologies’ – the only ones of the mathematical Universe, ‘lineal=fastest distance’ between two points that make up limbs and potentials of entropic motion’; hyperbolic body-waves that iterate=reproduce systems and connect the lineal limbs with the spherical (max. volume of information) particle-heads.
This ternary structure is PERCEIVED simultaneously to create a ‘SPACETIME ORGANISM’.
And then this organism in time according to the functions of motion of limbs/potentials, iteration of body/waves and information gauging of particle/heads will live a finite time duration – a WORLDCYCLE of existence.
So the existence of spacetime beings translates into the existence of ‘fractal super organisms of vital space’, tracing world cycles in time.
Let us study this ‘organic, vital reformulation’ of our ‘first principle: we are all super organisms in space tracing worldcycles in time, which we shall elaborate in the first line.
So the 5 Dimotions (ab. of dimension in space and motion in time) that create the form and function of all systems and its parts, between its generation by a mind-seed and extinction in entropic explosions are:
- Ði: Informative particles/heads: §ð
- Ð: limbs/potentials: momentum: st.
- Ð: ∑e x ∏i: body waves: ∑∏.
- Ðimotion: entropy: S∂.
- Ðimotion: Organic evolution: ∫T.
Let us elaborate a bit more into those symbols. Some basic rules:
Since dimotions evolve in time they acquire form. So we move from ‘lineal $pace’ (line crossing not money), and the symbol of lineal time in physics, t into…
the ‘curved symbol of time’ ð, and the ‘complex view’ of space, as ‘extending through 3 planes’ self-centered into the o-point, §…
With the intermediate phase of reproductive in body-waves organized around the duality body-head, wave-particle, whose main difference is this: body waves are blind herds of minimal connection, hence sums, ∑energy (which also resembles a wave put upwards) while neuronal, informative particle-heads are networks that exist across 2 scales the whole and its axons (hence the ∏ multiplicative symbol for a ‘crossed’ network, since if we have 5 and 5 elements, the number of axons to join them will be 5 x 5).
FINALLY for the two scalar dimension of entropy and generational organic evolution, the symbols which look like S and T are running out (:
S and T in capitals though have not been used and stress the capital importance of those dimensions which include all others as present sheets in a single plane of the fifth dimension. So those are actually the FULL meanings. Since Entropy is symbolized in physics by S, the choice is not rocket science. As the main operation to extract a part from a whole is a derivative, a ‘moment in time’ tangential to the function we study, ∂S is therefore a clear representation of Entropy (it does in fact happen mathematically very often as we shall study in mathematical physics and non-AElgebra).
So we are left with T, the capital Time of all times, for the most important dimension of them all the fifth dimension of social evolution, love, mind wholeness, organic generation, you name it. And aptly enough we still have an s left!, ∫, the symbol of integration, which is what truly social evolution is: the integration of similar clones into networks that become single wholes with an inner time synchronized externally by the mind (ok, im here letting my stream of consciousness flow, so we shall stop).
It follows some simplex symbols that define a logic equation of life and death with 3 phases:
$t: young age when motion dominates.
∑=∏: an age of balance and reproduction of the being, into waves of clone ‘cells’ that become reorganized by physiological networks emerging as a larger whole.
§ð: 3rd age of excess of information…
§ð<<∑∆-1: $t when death reverses the whole process as explode back a whole into its parts…
And as we observe death is fast and short and it exists only because it is necessary, as the positive arrows of information, reproduction and social evolution through a language of information increases so much the form of beings that finally there is no motion left, no energy to re-form… So to replenish the simplest motions for reality to keep moving, death must come but fast…
Further on, when we apply those organic structures also to social and physical systems, whose organic properties have been denied in the case of physics or reduced to the individual human scale in the case of social super organisms of history, WE CAN describe THEM all in terms of an homologic ‘worldcycle of existence’ in the graphs, explained in great detail.
The previous ‘equation’ thus uses the symbols of ‘I-logic’ topology and causal time chains of information (>) and entropy (<), intuitive in its expansive and implosive forms, is thus an expression of the generator in ‘time terms’, as the ‘flow of spacetime cycles of the fractal Universe’ (∆ð±¡) becomes ‘formed’ after feeding head and body into meaningful forms and motions of the 3 supeorganic parts of the plane of existence of the system (∆ø=| xO). Yet as information constantly increases in the ‘minute’ actions of the being, accumulating errors of reproduction, the system warps and gets older and the mind-language-head-system (§@) STILLS reality.
For example, humans keep ‘growing in the fifth dimension of space’ in territorial property as they get old till finally all its motionless – the old man, his money in the account, his territories of orders, homes and properties but there is NO vitality on it. The maximal ‘reach in space’ is achieved the minimal motion in time and at that point the system dies ‘fast’ << in entropic explosion that returns the timespace being, to the lower ‘plane of the fifth dimension, ∆ð¡-1.
The world cycle is an impressive element to study, as we travel through the fifth dimension precisely as we grow in size, by clone reproduction and self-organization of similar ∆-1 faster units (atoms, cells, citizens), which slow down the whole as first they have to evolve inner networks of simultaneous organization and synchronous motions which consume time. Then the being once it is perfectly synchronized internally but with a SLOWER time-clock for all those synchronous systems OUTWARDLY, emerges as a whole, and keeps ‘increasing its territorial size’ that will ‘slow down its vital rhythms’ till ending and old stultified property ‘thingy’.
We can see in the first graph, how all physical, biological and social systems, follow the same ‘worldcycle’ of existence as a travel through 3 ∆±1 scales of the fifth dimension, as they are born in a seminal seed that emerges into an ∆º scale, where it will move decreasing its motion and increasing its information through a gaseous, young state of minimal information, through a reproductive, liquid state of balance into a 3rd age of maximal information, exploding back its form into motion, in the entropic process of death.
∆ð±¡≈≥>S@< informative third age age exploded black to its ∆-1 beings and as memories in its larger world place.
All the organic systems of the Universe, physical, biological and historic, follow the same 5 Dimensional states of a worldcycle, from its fast evolving relative 5th dimension or generation age of social evolution from an ∆-1 seed to an emerging ∆º individual through the 3 dimensional ages of life, to the 4th dimension of entropic death..
What physicists do with its simplified models of 4 Dimensions, is to reject the arrow of social evolution, love and organic information, which is the 5th dimension of creating wholes by parts, because of its ‘concept of time’ merely as change of motion, locomotion, lineal motion, which then for the whole Universe becomes the arrow of ‘entropy and death’, and we shall adscribe by the correspondence principle to the fourth dimension.
“God is the unmoved (perceptive) center of a body of energy, moving around it”. “We are all Gods (of our super organisms).” Aristotle
We stated that the Universe despise departing from only 5 Demotions can get enormously complex.
We observed the fundamental sequential order of ‘micro-actions’, which start by a mind perceiving, moving then to a field of energy in which to feed the body and use the extra energy for reproduction, in a herd of clones that will efficiently organize social networks to become a larger whole, with slower external time cycles clearly as it must first synchronize its internal forms.
So ultimately all start with a singularity mind, mapping the Universe in its still language that perceives in itself (language is perception, in the sentient; ‘sensorial’ Universe).
So there is another way to order the 5 Dimotions into a logic Equation: ∆ð≥S@, describing the formal reduction of a temporal flow of cycles of space-time into a mind-mapping, from the infinite Universe into the linguistic, still zero mind.
All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.
In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.
Descartes was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.
So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.
Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:
– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.
– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.
And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.
Euclidean mathematics, as Descartes and Kant understood is only the 3 perpendicular ‘space-time elements’ of a massless ray of light merely shrinks all other scales of reality to fit into the mind.
In the graph, as our mind is electronic, we feed on light energy and transform it into an informative mapping of the Universe, reduced to what light sees. Thus our space is light space-time, with its 3 Euclidean coordinates, a fact that was first understood NOT by physicists but by impressionist artists, Leonardo, whose motto ‘saper vedere’, guided my inquire as a young artist on reality behind the languages that describe it, and then by the impressionists; and finally by Picasso, who departed from reality, affirming he painted thoughts, so he studied the ‘elements’ of the mind mapping, its entropic lines (cubist age) and its cyclical forms (female portraits).
So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.
– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.
•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad: ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.
The equation of the mind.
The problem of mathematicians with a single time/singularity IS THAT THEY CANNOT EMPATHIZE with the infinite other LANGUAGES and beings of the Universe… To be an Aristotelian God among Gods, to be an infinite infinitesimal, the equation of all minds-monads:
O x ∞ = Konstant: O-singularity (linguistic mind) x ∞ time space cycles (Universe) = Constant world,
That is the game. But to survive in that game you must also be aware there are other infinite singularities, all with the same rights to feel god… That is a much more perfect Leibnizian Universe… than the simplex one physicists sponsor. The equation that describers the theory of everything in that sense is the simplest of all of them:
0 x ∞ = K, the 0-1 temporal unit sphere, reflected in the 1-∞ spatial statistical one.
It is the main theorem of measure theory, which in physics reflects the equivalence between a quantum temporal scale (0-1 probabilistic description, of the faster, temporal quantum world) and the thermodynamical statistical one (1-∞ spatial description of the larger, slower thermodynamic world…
As time is faster, the o-1 smaller sphere fits better the quantum description, as space is slower, the 1-∞ fits better the molecular world, but both are by measure theory equivalent, because as we shall show bit by bit, species by species, all mind think the same: to be gods, to survive, to order its territory, and come on top:
Space is then ONLY within the mind that measures in simultaneous perception the multiple vital space-time cycles translated into the language of a still mind that perceives in itself. Thus space is virtual. The true substance of reality being its temporal motions. On the other hand the description human minds (@) make of the Universe is subconsciously biased by those ‘still, linguistic mind mappings of space’, (∫@) in which the ∞ of time motions (∆ð) is reduced and equalled to the spatial mind mapping.
Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality.This simple equation of similarity between the space perception of reality provided by a mind, and the whole Universe of moving time-cycles (as nothing is still outside the mind’s perception, being all observed in detail in perpetual motion), appeared in science as a philosophy of the Universe, when Descartes realized that what we see is NOT reality but what the mind ‘stops’ in its selective perception of all the information of reality. So the only truth we can depart from is the fact that we think and perceive still linguistic thoughts, hence we exist; making of informative perception in a still mind, the first ‘action’ of existence, even prior to motion which is unconscious of being.
Descartes astounding insight soon brought here to define mathematically, topologically and conceptually a ‘mind-singularity of order’, the ‘missing’ factor on our descriptions of reality, unfortunately was soon forgotten, and substituted by the naive realism of modern science – what we or our electronic instruments see is what there is there. But only marrying the spatial mind-linguistic view and the Universe of infinite time cycles, we can factor in all the elements and start to unknot the bias the spatial mind cast upon our objective comprehension of reality, which is our task as scientists.
In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’. Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs.
Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, to calculate functions of space-time that WORK mirroring reality – hence they must exist. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely NOT, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors – what matters though is that they do process information, order territories that become time§paœrganisms and hence WITHOUT THEM there will only be entropy, not order, reason why physicists who don’t recognise those ‘poles of in-form-ation’ deny order and believe the Universe is a chaotic entropic state. YET WE OBSERVE order, so the experimental method oblige us to conclude there is a ‘darwinian automatic non-conscious selection’ of systems which develop singularities and ‘SURVIVE’ creating the order of reality.
Consciosuness would then be an unneeded dual mirror in which the first mirror perceives the spatial mapping of the second mirror, dialoguing with it (in the way I robot is consciousness by having a second brain). In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only very good ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms.
So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them.
Since there are ∞ minds, gauging information; and stopping the motions of time into the intelligence of formal space, as they try to ‘stiff’ reality into the mirror image of the language, which of course they confuse with the universe itself – and this is indeed the origin of the creationist theories of religious and scientific people, we must now debunk on firm grounds as we have a better grasp of why we see still the earth (our mind stops its motion) when objectively it is moving, why in other words we see ‘spaces’ when it is all about ‘times’.
A subject in itself fundamental to understand Relativity, is brought here to point out, the reason why in entropic only big-bang theories, we do see indeed light space-time expanding between galaxies, as light is space and so when it comes closer to the mass of the galaxy, elongates/red shifts its color (the only real effect observed; as we obviously are NOT out there in-between Andromeda and the Milky way with a tape). And vice versa, when Light collapses into our electronic ‘eye’ or any electronic source, it increases its frequency balancing both effect to cancel the supposed big-bang death of the Universe.
But in the scalar REALITY, gravitation makes points LARGER when we observe them in the scale of the fifth dimension where they do interact above us, and will EASILY evaporate our ’empty bubble’ of light-light beings.
So Hilbert and Cantor who talked of ‘their imaginary paradise from where nobody would expel them, ass the Jihad warriors who die to enter paradise, just invented non-existen points, lines, planes with their imagination.
In the graph, we see thus, the true meaning of the 5th and 1st Non-E postulate, which define both the real fractal point (1st postulate) and the real mind that bends it into a smallish mind. Since the fractal point does have breath, as it includes a volume of energy, entropy and information, carried by a relative number of ‘finitesimal’ parallel waves, but the ‘Aristotelian mind’, reduces it to an Euclidean point:
We have to introduce the first postulate of non-Æ so you realise how ‘limited’ is the homunculus mind.
Thus, human egos are just finitesimals with a huge ego, because they confuse their zero point-mind with the real infinite Universe, of fractal points, thinking the volume of information they store in their mind is all.
THE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE: POINTS->NETWORKS->SUPERORGANISMS OF SPACE-TIMES
Fractal points: the fundamental particle
We are going to use 3 basic symbols for the Singularity and the territorial body wave it orders around it as a vital energy, encircled by an angular momentum, or ‘membrane’, which forms the basic organism of reality a membrain of vital energy, moving around: œ, @, •, which you can consider 3 degrees of development of the singularity as an organism, a self-centered mind with a will order its body around it through its actions, or a mere point of perception. The interaction and different dimensions of the singularity in its different complex actions makes it by far the most important and yet less distinguishable, hence less amenable to direct experimental observation of all the elements of the being.
In mathematics it can be studied as a fractal particle, or point, •.
Time motions break absolute space into bidimensional space-time membranes. Œ: fractal, i-logic, non-Euclidean, cyclical points of view: the fundamental particle
We exist in a Universe, whose fundamental particle is not a material form, as simple science thinks, but points of time space, which mirror in their inner, i-logic, fractal topologies the information of their world, acting-reacting to the Universe. Thus only by mixing perception and motion, mathematics and organicism, we can define those points of existence, as the fundamental particles of reality and:
‘The Universe has a body and a soul called logos.’ Plato
So we describe a Universe with a geometrical how, the laws of Non-Euclidean points of views, the cycles they trace, the mathematical laws that describe those cycles; and a bio-logical, temporal why: the will to move, trying to fulfill the 6 arrows of time. It is the game that all P.O.Vs of all planes of existences, from atoms to human beings perform.
Those logic and mathematical laws of points of view are the metaphysical laws of the Universe – the only essential events/forms that repeat unchanged in all forms. And so, a proper description of the Universe should start with the laws of i-logic geometry; then apply them to the 2 simplest motions of reality, lineal forces and cyclical masses/charges; and then, once those ‘immortal laws’ are defined for any system of energy and information, science should use them to define the specific events of each scale of reality and its species, as we all play the same Game of Exi=stence.
Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath.
However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.
What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.
Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.
Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = Spacetime mapping.
So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.
So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s.
So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of ‘—motions’ and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point.
This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels. So we must consider that what Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time is its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye.
That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of ‘—motions’ and information that defines them.
Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean definition, which says:
Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel
Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:
Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:
Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:
A point external to a line is crossed by ∞ parallel forces.
Real, discontinuous, ∆-dimensional points: =========== o
This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope.
Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.
So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.
So each point is in fact a 3-dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on. Yet those dimensions are the so-called fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point. In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: Tƒ be a fractal world, a space-time in itself.
‘Any Non-Euclidean point is a fractal space-time with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the ∆+1 ecosystem in which it exists’.
The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they act-react accordingly.
The fundamental particle of the Universe is not a physical form but a logic particle: a knot of time arrows, which in any scale of reality, from physical particles (quantum knots of ‘—motions’ and information) to biology (knots=networks that absorb ‘—motions’, information and reproduce and evolve into bigger knots) act under a single mandate: to maximize those time arrows, a fact that we formalize with an equation, the function of Existence: Max. ∑Sp x Tƒ; which is the fundamental function of both, logic and mathematical languages. In the graph, all such points of view, will define a system of relative perpendicular coordinates, through which it will enact its time arrows, departing from a central knot of information.
In the graph, apperception of the Universe happens by reducing the cycles of time into a single spherical point, according to the topological properties of all spherical systems, which can diminish in size without deformation.
This is called the Poincare Conjecture, and his recent proof was the most important finding on mathematics for decades. It simply speaking only n-spheres can reduce without limit an n-dimensional Universe into a fractal mirror without deformation and tearing. And that is why there is a fundamental dominant membrane-point system in all the organisms of the Universe, which creates the order of reality. The paradox though is that the membrane, the time cycle is moving very fast, and the point in the center is a static mind.
The most fascinating of the 3 varieties of bidimensional space times is the sphere, which can shrink in size without limit (Poincare conjecture). Thus all systems have external sensorial membranes that transfer information to a central zero point, defining a general equation for all minds:
0-point=mind x ∞ World = Constant mapping of the Universe.
This simple law is the most important law of the 4th paradigm, foreseen by Leibniz in his Monadology, the foundation of the mathematical model of Multiple spaces-times that completes the 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry and gives us the tools necessary to create a complex new logic and new mathematical model of the Universe, easy to connect through topology with the isomorphisms of the previous paradigm of a single metric space-time continuum.
Further on those points must be described always in 4 dimensions, with motion. This should have been obvious, but abstract mathematics simplifies entities into numbers and static forms, and organic motion properties disappear. Yet we still say ‘San Francisco is at 8 hours from LA’, because we mean that journey is a combination of the motion of a car and the spatial distance. Thus we measure reality in Time-space, not only in space as Euclidean maths do.
Thus, in the same way Saturn’s rings stop being planes without volume when we come closer and observe them as fractal points, called planetoids; Non-Euclidean points acquire both motion and volume when we approach to them. In words of Klein, a sphere is not a continuous static form, but a group of points in cyclical movement. So in the same way the Saturn’s rings are a group of planetoids, a Klein space – the space-time that fills a point has motion – it is the sum of a series of cycles5.
Einstein didn’t go further, adapting the other 4 Euclidean definitions to the new Geometrical unit: a fractal point with volume. Only then we will be able to define the 2 planes of physical forces, the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism, or any system in which several planes of space-time co-exist together (as in a human being extended from atomic to social planes of cyclical existence).
In all those systems planes are made with cellular points, Riemannian spheres with volume that form lines, which are waves between points that exchange ‘—motions’ and information and planes, which are organs of self-similar points that process ‘—motions’ or information in parallel networks.
Thus the 5 Postulates of Non-E Geometry vitalize the Universe as a series of networks of ‘—motions’ and information of self-similar cellular points. Since the line and the plane acquire volume and become self-similar to the commonest forms of the Universe, the wave and the network of points with a 3-D volume.
This simple fact explains one of the most important discoveries of modern physics, the Holographic principle, according to which information might be bidimensional, as in the screen of a computer or the page of a book. Now bidimensionality no longer becomes ‘magic’ since the 3rd dimension is the relative size of the ‘fractal point-particle’. Thus bidimensional sheets of information do have a minimal 3rd Dimension; the inner content of the point, which in a relative universe of infinite sizes seems to us a particle-point without volume, as we don’t see either the volume of a sheet of paper or a pixel.
All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks. Now this might sound absurd to the anthropomorphic reader that thinks humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that those points obey in their åctions and communicative flows within a network the same isomorphisms: humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds, the geometries of social groups are also the same and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on ‘—motions’ and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. And so that group of isomorphisms of networks becomes a primary why for all beings of the Universe.
A fact the leads us to the final element needed to understand the why of the Universe: ‘non-Euclidean points’ organize networks that become points of a higher scale, which reproduce and organize new networks; and so the Universe keep growing in fractal scales, from particles that organize networks and become atoms that organize networks and become molecules that organize networks and become cells, that become organisms, that become planetary societies and planets and stars form gravitational networks that become galaxies, organized by dark matter into Universal networks.
Because all entities have motion reproduction is merely the repetition of a motion with form. Because each entity has 4 time arrows, all of them trace multiple trajectories in search of those arrows, hence they realize multiple time cycles.
For example, a human feeds on ‘—motions’ and information with body and head, reproduces through multiple social cycles and evolves into societies. Our åctions are more complex but essentially the same of those of any particle.
So the unit of reality is a space-time cycle, and many of them create a knot of time cycles or entity of reality, which will be reproduced by repeating those formal cycles with motion in other region of space-time; and many of those knots of time cycles, which are self-similar, since they are born from the reproduction of a first form, come together with self-similar beings into networks. Some of those networks are spatially extended with a lot of motion (fields in physics, bodies in biology) and some are very tight, formal, with a lot of in/form/ation, (particles and heads or nuclei in physical and biological jargons). Both types of networks together then create a complementary organism, which is fitter to handle both ‘—motions’ and form; hence it survives better, it ‘exists’.
Today scientists of measure scorn philosophical and logical analysis of causality in time because it cannot be easily put in numbers. But numbers are only one of the languages of information in the Universe, and many of its properties of bio-logic nature are better described with logic words. In that regard, we can now fusion philosophy and science answering the fundamental question, ‘why we exist’; since once we realize that we are ‘made of time cycles’, knots of time cycles and networks of knots of time cycles, an intelligent, informative, eternal universe of motions and wills of existence makes the dogmas of deism and mechanism, childish myths.
‘What is existence’ cannot be revealed from the simplex point of view of a mechanical world, which cannot explain the fact that we are made of motions with form that leave a trace on space but are essentially åctions in time that have a social finality – to create more complex networks, chaining knots of åctions into systems. This social will of every point and entity of the Universe is completely at odds with a mechanist, fixed, solid, senseless, dumb Universe. Motion in Time and social evolution are concepts that require the capacity to gauge information and interact with other self-similar points to create those organic networks. Further on, dual networks tend to evolve and reproduce new points through exchanges of ‘—motions’ and information.
The result is the creation of 3rd network/system: the reproductive network. And so most systems of the Universe are organic, ternary systems made of points (which can be anything from atoms to cells to human heads) organized in 3 networks. We exist as organic networks, to sense flows of ‘—motions’ and gauge information. Existence justifies itself.
Those Non-Euclidean points crossed by infinite parallels are able to gauge information, which implies a perceptive, intelligent Universe in all its fractal, self-similar scales of reality – a world in which even the smallest atoms can act-react to the environment, ‘apperceiving’ light and gravitational forces. Aristotle and Leibniz, the 2 foremost predecessors of the 4th paradigm of biological whys distinguished conscious perception from vegetative and mechanical perception.
It means perception has degrees of complexity. So the simplex particles of the Universe act-react in a mechanical way; yet they still gauge information, reason why quantum physicists called their theories gauge theories, and they still have 2 complementary networks of ‘—motions’ and information, reason why quantum physics is based in such complementary principle.
Yet this intelligent, active, temporal, informative Universe can be described with the formalism of logic and mathematics because its fundamental unit – a spacetime cycle – can be explained with ‘feedback’ equations, used in system sciences to explain the back and forth interaction between two poles or elements of an equation. SeTƒ where Se is a component of spatial ‘—motions’, a motion element, body or field and Tƒ is a cycle of time that carries information, particle or head, becomes the syntactic, logic, minimal unit of reality.
These simple first elements of reality – points with volume that exchange ‘—motions’ and information, creating waves of ‘—motions’ with form (no longer lines – 2nd postulate), according to a set of isomorphisms based in their self-similarity, (no longer equality – 3rd postulate), that makes them evolve into different topological networks (no longer planes – 4th postulate) – make mathematics an organic language able to describe the logic of creation of all systems of the Universe made of infinite fractal, organic networks intersecting and creating when we put them together under those isomorphisms and topological restrictions, the puzzle of reality that the simpler, 3rd paradigm called the space-time continuum and becomes now a General System of Multiple, Fractal Spaces with vital ‘—motions’ and Time cycles with information, the two substances of which all beings are made.
And so with those 3 scales of ‘existence’: time cycles, knots of time cycles and networks of knots of time cycles (Non-E Points) we can explain all the ‘åctions’ and systems of reality made of those cycles, knots and networks; and describe a complex Universe that exists ‘in time’ more than in fixed space, since it has always motion; it is also dynamic, made of cyclical, feed-back equations whose causal relationships, forms and trajectories are the essence and purpose of existence.
We thus consider a more complex analysis of time arrows, beyond the duality of ‘—motions’ and information, which combine creating a reproductive arrow, Sp X Tƒ, and further on socialize, ∑Sp X Tƒ, creating networks. And so the universe has also an organic will: to create networks of self-reproductive points of ‘—motions’ and information.
Yet the most astounding property of those points is to be points of view, points with will, which perform åctions with the purpose mechanical or not, but probably felt in all scales as the inner freedom of the point, of obtaining ‘—motions’, information reproduction and social evolution. The 4 wills or whys of the Universe are indeed embedded in the postulates of i-logic geometry. The point to exist has to be complementary, to feed and gauge ‘—motions’ and information and to last beyond its wearing it has to form part of bigger social networks or reproduce itself to last beyond death.
This simple program self-selects those species that reproduce and evolve socially even if that contradicts the primary individual arrows of the point. Thus the engine of the contradictions of behavior of points is that tug of war between the Galilean paradox of all points which gauge bigger his nose than Andromeda but need to hunt in herds and control the forms of the Universe with self-similar minds, joined in networks, this eternal duality of freedom vs. order, individual ego vs. collective spirit.
Tƒ exist is to act with motion and form, trying to achieve the ‘arrows of time’ or will of the Universe – feeding your ‘—motions’ network, absorbing information for your informative network, reproduce your system and in doing so, starting an external process of social evolution with self-similar entities to yourself.
Those processes can be described with mathematics but we have to accept an intelligent, perceptive, fractal, self-similar Universe of infinite points of view gauging reality in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious way to explain why it happens. Their mathematical description stems from the duality between geometric form and logical function (hilomorphism).
Thus, the postulates of fractal i-logic geometry define also the basic arrows= cycles/dimensions of the Universe: the 1st and 5th postulate define a point as a system whose inner parts are able to transform and emit ‘—motions’ and information, Sp>Tƒ<Sp; the 2nd postulate defines an Sp X Tƒ wave of communication that reproduces ‘—motions’ and form between 2 fractal points; the 4th postulate defines the social evolution of a herd that creates a fractal plane – a network with dark spaces; and the 5th postulate explains a point mapping reality, as it absorbs ‘—motions’ and transforms it into information through its small apertures to the Universe. Since even a minimal quark, as Einstein affirms, should be crossed by a relative ∞ number of strong forces.
It is the organic will of all systems that search for those 4 arrows what makes the quark to exist as a knot of such flows of time arrows: a physical particle traces energetic cycles described by the principal quantum number; shapes the form of its trajectory, a fact explained by the secondary quantum number; iterates along the 3 coordinates in similar shapes, an act described by the magnetic number, and gauges information to evolve in social groups, a fact described by its spin number. And those 4 numbers define it as a Non-Euclidean quantum knot of complementary ‘—motions’ and information with a 4D will of time. And as it happens they express the 4 arrows of time: Sp->Principal number; I-> secondary number; Re-> spin number; 4-> social evolution: magnetic number.
Further on, we can reduce all those topologies of social numbers and networks to the canonical 3 topologies of a 4-dimensional Universe, proving that those 3 topologies have the properties of ‘—motions’, information and reproductive events.
And so we talk of 4 ‘arrows of time’ or dimensions of change that create the future: energetic and informative systems and events, which reproduce a wealth of self-similar beings that organize themselves into social networks, creating bigger wholes – new scales of reality. And this simple game of complementary beings that in favorable conditions reproduce self-similar beings, self-organized into bigger social networks becomes the why of all realities. Even the simplest particles, quarks of maximal information and electrons of maximal spatial extension and motion ‘decouple’, reproduce, when absorbing ‘—motions’ into self-similar forms, and associate in complementary networks called atoms, made with a central informative mass of quarks and an energetic, electromagnetic, wider body of electrons.
The 3rd paradigm of metric measure is not at ease with such ‘dynamic, spiritual concepts’, even if they can be described with the same mathematical formalisms as the previous example of the quantum numbers show. Those apprehensions however are dogmas, which stem from anthropomorphic beliefs.
Fact is that even the simplest complementary systems (quarks and electrons) interact together and if they can absorb more ‘—motions’=motion they are able to repeat=reproduce the cycles of its system. And so we talk of a 3rd reproductive system: from quarks and electrons, the fundamental particles of the Universe that decouple in new particles when they absorb new ‘—motions’ to living organisms, the fact that all is motion with form makes easy to reproduce those formal motions in an organic way. Thus the new concept of a world made of formal motions brings about also a more complex philosophy of reality – organicism. Organicism and its mathematical units, fractal points, that gather into social networks called topological spaces substitute the restricted concepts of Euclidean points, continuous spacetimes and mechanism, explaining why all those time cycles exist, guided by 4 time arrows: ‘—motions’ feeding, information gauging, reproduction and social evolution.
Those 4 categories are the so-called drives of living beings, the quantum numbers of particles, the 4 dimensions of our light space (electric-informative height, reproductive magnetic width, energetic length and social colors). Thus, there is a ‘Universal Plan’ with an existential finality: to create organic systems, departing from ‘—motions’ bites and information bits evolved 1st into social networks, then into complementary systems and finally into organic systems, news points of a bigger fractal whole: particles become atoms that become molecules that become cells, organisms, planets, galaxies and Universes. It is the 4th organic why that completes the adventure of science and this work explores in all its consequences.
Reality can be resumed in 2 words: networks, whose flows of exchange of ‘—motions’ and form creates the patterns and events of reality and organicism, the philosophy of reality based on them. Organicism means reality and all its fractal parts are made of vital spaces (bodies and forces) and time cycles (informations). We do not exist in an abstract background of time and space but we are made of time cycles and lineal spaces, cyclical and lineal strings if we were to use the restricted jargon of physics, a specific case of the wider jargon of general systems, which evolve socially to create the complex systems of each science.
Those wider, more complex definitions of time and space will substitute and absorb according to the Principle of Correspondence that makes each paradigm a particular case of the new, wider view, the limited concepts of a single space-time continuum and a mechanist description of the Universe, proper of the age of metric measure, which the pioneers of systems sciences and complexity have wrestled with throughout the XX century.
Recap. A Universe made of motions in time, extending through multiple scales of relative space, requires evolving the human languages of space (Euclidean geometry) and time (Aristotelian logic), used to describe the simpler space-time continuum of classic science. This task started by the pioneers of modern science (Riemann, Darwin, Planck and Einstein) must be completed before we can study the properties of physical and biological entities with the new tools of Non-Euclidean mathematics, which describe a world of multiple, relative space-time networks made of points as Complementary entities with energetic and informative system or ‘Points of view’ and the new tools of Non-Aristotelian logic, which describe the creation of the future by multiple causes – all the points of view or agents that create a certain network space.
The universe is a game of creation and destruction of networks of fractal knots of time cycles=st-points.
The minimal unit of the universe is a Non-Euclidean point/number, which classic mathematics defines as void of inner form and organic properties, to simplify the networks of numbers and point-like entities of the Universe for its geometric study. In reality though, points have breath; that is, they are real entities with ‘—motions’ and information parts, and so we have to upgrade Euclidean definitions of points, planes, lines and equality with the new tools of Fractal and Non-Euclidean mathematics to make the language of geometry closer to reality.
What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.
Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.
Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = ∏ime§paœ mapping.
So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.
FRACTAL POINTS: SINGULARITIES AND MEMBRAINS, THE MIND SYSTEMS
The new 5 postulates of a Non-Euclidean, fractal geometry of Multiple Spaces and Times are:
1st Postulate: ‘A fractal point is a world with an inner content of information that creates its 3 internal, topologic, organic dimensions and a content of energy that traces its external motions=time arrows’
2nd Postulate: ‘A line is a wave of fractal points.’
3rd Postulate: ‘2 fractal points are self-similar when their external, spatial perimeter or their inner information is equal. Similar points form organic networks by sharing their energy and information. Dissimilar points ab=use each other in Darwinian relationships’
4th Postulate: ‘A plane is a network that joins points through waves of energy and information.’
5th Postulate: ‘Non-Euclidean points perceive energy and information: A fractal point has inner apertures to the world, through which multiple waves of energy and information can cross.’
The first postulate defines a point with form and energy. Points are not ‘points with no breath’ (Euclid), an abstract definition that created the simplified concept of a space-time continuum but ‘fractal points’, which grow in size when we come closer to them. And so stars are points in the sky that become huge as we come closer to them. And a microscope discovers an entire world in the minimal size of a cell. Einstein offered a partial solution to this conundrum considering that from our scale of size, those Non-E points seem to curve the information of the universe that fluxed on it.
But Leibniz had given a better answer: ‘the smallest point is a world in itself’. This is the meaning of a fractal point, whose internal parts respond to the 3 topologies of a 4-dimensional Universe: a hyperbolic, informative system; an energetic, planar or spherical membrane and a cyclical, toroidal region with reproductive organs. And we shall find those 3 topological regions in all points-species of the Universe.
It is now clear that non-Euclidean points are points of view that gauge information and move their complementary body with a will, seeking for more energy and information and reproduction, seeking for an organic will to repeat their cycles and motions. And this will gives the point the category of mind, or Atman or soul, a perceptive point of view that absorbs information and moves its body accordingly after ‘thinking’ the information and ‘bending’ it subjectively to its will.
That we have no free will but we have will is the deepest consequence of stating that all points of view search for its 3+1 dimensions of existence, its energy, informative, reproductive and social arrows.
To do so the point must perceive and gauge. If it is an electron it will gauge and move to capture energy to structure its form (2nd quantum number) and it will use a language of information to evolve socially (magnetic number). Points thus are moved by the need to perform their 4 cycles of existence, a desire to acquire more energy and form which they better achieve in networks, with the flexibility of herd hunting and network thinking. But in each scale of reality there is a rational point of view calculating its strategies to get more energy and form.
Networks are made of relative points with form and motion, which can be defined as time cycles – trajectories traced by an entity in search of energy, information, reproduction or social interaction. Those time cycles enclose a surface of vital space or energy and so they define a certain space-time. Any entity will however trace many cycles in search of its organic motions to feed, gauge, reproduce and evolve socially into bigger networks.
So each entity will be a knot of multiple time cycles.In the formalism of Systems sciences we call them Non-Euclidean points, since they are points through which infinite flows of energy (parallels) and information can cross. We also represent them with the symbol ‘i’, which is the next vowel to the A-ristotelian, E-uclidean paradigm, the symbol of information and a visual image of the 2 components of the point, the informative, cyclical part, o, and the lineal, energetic one, |, which we call the body and head of a biological Point; or the field and particle of a physical point (Principle of Complementarity).
The universe is made of networks of such i-points, and each network is what we call a world or discontinuous space-time, st, unit of a bigger fractal network, a new st-point in itself. So a network of particles becomes an atom, which becomes an st-point of a molecule and so on till creating the Universe.
Even humans can be studied as Non-E points, in which each head is indeed a spherical point that communicates energy and information with other humans, forming social networks.
The anthropomorphic reader might think that humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that all points obey in their actions and communicative flows within a network the same laws: humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds; the geometries of social groups are also the same; and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on energy and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. Thus the laws of networks become the social, organic, reproductive why of all beings of the Universe: the Universe reproduces information and organize forms socially into networks.
From magnetic and electric fields, made of magnetic and electric constants that mix and reproduce a light wave to fundamental particles, quarks and electrons that absorb energy and reproduce new quarks and electrons, to energetic males and informative females that reproduce together, all in the Universe can be described with the formalism of networks, connects the why with how and when of the 3rd paradigm of metric measure that has analyzed those networks, its motions and forms in detail. Why those i-points with an ego-driven will that desires selfishly more energy and information and self-reproduction collaborate in herds, becoming parts of a whole has to do with the complexity by which the arrow of social evolution impose systems to its parts. Parts become enslaved by their dependency to the higher energy and information provided by networks.
5th postulate: Paradox of Galileo – definition of ego-soul: fractal P.O.V.
All minds, including man, are self-centered beings that believe to be the center of creation, because they gauge information from its point of view. Yet most of reality either exists in a dark space the species doesn’t perceive or uses a language the species doesn’t decode or it is further away from our ‘noses’ to be of any importance to us. This explains anthropomorphism and the incapacity of man to perceive himself as just another knot of simplex and complex actions of energy and time.
The laws of those Points of view that gauge information, are Laws of Non-Euclidean geometries. The formalism of General Systems Sciences, which studies networks of points of view is therefore Non-Euclidean. Regarding its Logic structure, past, present and future become relative concepts and so the ‘logic’ of the Universe in which past, present and future co-exist in simultaneous space-time fields, is different, is paradoxical, dual… Its formalism can be fusioned with that of Non-Euclidean geometry in what we call illogic geometry, the linguistic foundations of all General systems.
The paradox of the ego: linguistic points of view.
Perception is possible because of the mentioned paradox of Galileo: all is motion, and so informations are cycles of time with curved motions and energy-space are sheets of lineal motion. And so because all is motion, the repetition of those motions is in fact a simple reproduction that takes place in simple atomic particles (with cyclical vortex of motion) or lineal fields of energy (with wave-like motions).
The paradox of Galileo is again a fundamental law of the relativity Universe ill-understood by scientists who ‘see’ still pictures of reality with their instruments and seek for ‘substances’ instead of motions. It is also the key to the 8th key principle of G.S.Theory, the paradox of the ego.
All individual systems perceive or process information with their linguistic or geometric minds; using that information to guide their body towards fields of energy in which they feed.
Yet since resources are limited, to achieve those 2 simplest arrows of existence, all systems prey in the energy and information of other species causing their death in Darwinian, preying events. We thus talk of two ethical arrows in a universe of limited resources.
Top predator individual species will try to obtain energy from their environment absorbing it from species with weaker energy bodies and informative heads, provoking Darwinian, predatory relationships, causing their death in Darwinian, preying events.
And they will perceive the universe from their egoistic point of view, as a static dead space, of which they are the center. Since from their subjective perspective, their nose seems bigger than the Andromeda galaxy and the earth seems quiet surrounded by infinitesimal stars.
Yet objectively, the ego is just an infinitesimal, fractal mirror, reflecting a minimal part of the infinite information of the whole without which it will cease to exist.
It is the paradox of the selfish ego that wants to be the center of the universe. The paradox of the ego is the main cause of extinction of all species, which as the human beings are unable to respect the infinity and power of the whole and consider themselves special sons of god, entitled to control and destroy nature, till the Newtonian laws of action reaction, extinguish them. Thus we define each of the infinite Aristotelian Gods, center of a surface of energy they move and prey on:
‘Every point of view=mind feels the center of the Universe, but it is only an infinitesimal Non-Euclidean point that stores a limited mapping of reality with its informative languages.’
We are all Atmans, informative CPUs, souls that gauge in different languages reality, to construct a mental mapping that caters to our point of view and arrows of time. So we create our ‘perceived Universe’ – a fact known from Descartes to Schopenhauer, but lost to ‘naïve, realist’ physicists. All of them thinking clocks are the only point that matters to measure time, and the human mind, the only ego that knots energy into form, since that is the only perspective they perceive. That is why most of history, humans thought the Earth to be the center of reality; and still think they are the only intelligent species.
Conclusion: The importance of the 5 postulates of Non-AE.
The importance and reason of making the 5 postulates of i-logic the centrepiece of the formalism of ¬æ should be now evident to the reader: in the process of topological growth from a single point of view, into a topological plane, which in itself will be a ternary being mess of 3 topologic networks (the entropic, ‘digestive’, energetic, ‘blood-reproductive’ and informative, ‘nervous systems), unlike normal abstract geometry in which the point merely becomes a line that forms a plane, with another line, the fractal point with parts, through which infinite parallels can cross, starts a game of social evolution, reproduction and exchange of energy and information with other points that will finally create networks that will develop into living ternary space-time organisms, in a process much more imprecise, chaotic, filled with trial and errors, interrupted by other entities, etc. etc. but perfectly describable with the logic rules of vital topology, which will surprisingly enough when studied in depth and considered the ‘foundational postulates’ of non-AE mathematics and logic will develop a quite accurate description of the events that compose a world cycle and the parts that create an organism.
It is then the 3rd postulate which Schopenhauer rightly criticised for not being self-evident, as the 5th (if we indeed take parallels as straight lines), which becomes also along the 5th postulate that defines a mind, and illogic temporal postulate also, as it gives the rule, obtained from practical view, and the converted into formal theorems, of engagement of beings, according to the different similarity of its 3 parts, of which externally obviously only the membrane, and depending on distance, as a mere point, will be observed.
IN THE GRAPH the languages of god are ∞ (upanishads), humans also use a verbal language, which mimics the elements of the fractal generator, which for that reason we express also in words.
Now we give a step further in the ‘search’ for self-similarities between all languages, reducing the expression of the fractal generator to a verb:
To exi≈st is the verbal expression of the generator, where the 3 elements of the generator acquire a verbal mode.
So instead of Spe > St>Tiƒ, we express the ternary symmetry in terms of a singularity, or To, a body-wave of entropy and form, mixed into energy and information, and a Space-time field from where the body extracts its foms
So , to describe the actions that from the point of view of a mind-singularity, to, perceive a body-wave, of entropy and information, exi ≈ riding as a space-time being of energy a field that sustained it. Tº≤ex i ≈ st
You can imagine those 3 parts, singularity, T•, body-wave: e x i, the most dynamic part, and below the world extended as a balanced space-time field in which the body and head co-exist together. The being in fact is more often defined as an exiTº a body-head, wave-particle duality and the field is detached of it. IN THE particle-field, though the description is To=st, as you see, each possible combination of those 3 elements starts the combinatorics of what we shall call in the ‘philosophy of science’, which is the verbal mode of GST, the ¬Æ: EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.
Unfortunately it is required, specially to make the whole T.œ match the equations of mathematical physics known for its exactitude. I.e. the main formula of physics are ALL expressions of those space-time demotions and its constants, ‘STeps’ of spacetime demotions, but which dimotion, what rules exist to combine each of the five dimotions and how they apply to every scale and phenomena of physics, is needed – the devil is in the details – to fully grasp those equations, graphed in the picture…
Indeed, once we understand the laws of T.œs, there is work for many generations to rewrite with the simplicity of the first principles of the Universe the entire cosmic landscape from the smallest to the largest form. As I failed in my youth when a student at Columbia U. to interest academia into the task of writing an encyclopedia of the 5D Universe, I had for 30 years to do the work in and out of my life and random jobs. So the reader should excuse that as so many pioneers, from Mr. Aristotle teaching that blockhead of Alexander, to Leonardo doubling as weapon master and painter, to Leibniz working for that blockhead of Prince William, the work is by force incomplete and disordered, abandoned and retaken, rewritten and lost so many times… all what I can do at this stage is to leave a trace in this blog, trying to maximize the coherence of its parts.