Home » ·1Man

·1Man

±∞ ¬∆@ST:

In the Fourth Line, we study in greater detail each Plane of Existence of the Humind’s perceived Universe between the invisible force of ∆-4 gravitation and the hardly perceived ∆+4 galactic cosmos.

We do so unlike in the first and second line, where we first explained the spatial super organisms as a whole structure made of pentalogic elements, ¬ entropic limits, Spatial topologies, Temporal ages, ternary scales and a linguistic mind, performing its actions of survival and then studied in a scientific classic jargon, the nested scalar supœrganisms of human stiences, decreasing in size and complexity (Galatom, Earth in its 3 ages, as Gaia>History>Metal-earth, Humans, its minds, and the minds of the Universe and its mathematical, logic and organic languages), with a more detailed temporal analysis  strictu senso,  by describing the 3 main þlacental palingenetic cycle, ∃xistential lifecycle and §ocial worldcycles all those super organisms live through between birth and extinction or the very rare transcendental worldcycle of resurrection,  through the Ðisomorphic method; which means to study, the 3 scales and worldcycles of each being, self-centered in its relative ∆º seed-mind:

The Ðisomorphic method studies in a vital, sequential time manner the 3 worldcycles of all Space-time supœrganisms (T.œs):                                        
þ: 0-1: its palingenetic o-1 social evolution in the accelerated time sphere of existence, till becoming 1 (0-1 bounded unit circle in ¡logic mathematics; quantum probability sphere of particles in physical systems; palingenetic fetal age in biologic systems; 0-9 memetic learning childhood in social systems). It is the highly ordered world cycle as the ‘placental mother-energy world’ is nurturing, and memorial cyclical spacetime has erased errors of previous generations. We thus use for the 1st world cycle, the informative Dual Isomorphisms, of the mind-seed (@ MENTAL Сisomorphisms), as 0-points are generated (0th isomorphism,•) to follow the GST, Fractal Generator equation or program of existence of the Universe (1st Isomorphism,Γ), which will allow the being, in the energy-rich placenta to perform asymmetric space-time actions (2nd and 5th, DIMOTIONAL Сsomorphisms, ß,å) of energy feeding, reproduction and social evolution, to imprint the information of the seed as the system growths in Space (SPATIAL Сsomorphisms) and develops its 3 physiological networks (3rd isomorphism,ψ), which finally merge, into a whole one that emerges (4th isomorphism) into:                  
                                                                                 
– c: The outer 1-∞ world, in which it will deploy its 2nd world cycle of existence in an environment which is open, entropic (1-∞ hyperbolic unbounded Cartesian plane in ¡logic mathematics; thermodynamic entropic statistical molecular populations in physics; Darwinian struggle between populations in biology; idol-ogic dog-eat-dog capitalist, nationalist competitive eco(nomic)systems in the super organisms of history. In this 1-∞ existence the world cycle is not ensured to continue, as it can be cut off by the entropy of the world system.
We thus study the second world cycle with 3 sets of Сisomorphisms, slightly different to those of the o-1 sphere; as the individual now will have to exercise in time guided the mind (no longer a passive seed), its survival will choosing its actions of existence, (5th isomorphism, common to both worldcycles, albeit now defined by the active mind), that will determine in a cumulative sum, its 2 TIME Isomorphisms: the duration of its ages (7th Сisomorphism: Ω), further subdivided in space-time quanta (9th Ðisomorphism: µ), as it exists through its 2 EXISTENTIAL ¬ D¡somorphisms, as a member of a species, (6th D¡isomorphism, œ) itself a superorganism, albeit with a higher entropic, disordered structure, living in an entropic world or ecosystem with other species (8th Disomorphism), trying to DEFY THE ENTROPIC LIMITS OF TIME duration (7th Di) and spatial territory (8th) imposed by a higher social order and control its world, through:      
ω: The 3 final SCALAR D¡isomorphisms (∆) taking place outside the being, existential life cycle, as part of a larger world of hierarchical social scales (§), as it performs those actions through ∆±4 Planes self-centered in its mind, beyond which it cannot longer perceive, to become if successful a new superorganism of the infinite planes of God, the game of existence, (11 Disomorphism).                                                                                                        
 Thus to ‘travel through the 5th dimension of space-time’ is the ultimate meaning of existence – an ordered sequence, departing from an ∆-1 seed (fractal point), which generate as it emerges from the o-1 unit sphere into a larger 1-∞ Universe 3 physiological networks that become an ∆º individual of a larger ∆+1 world, where it will live through 3±2¡ ages, in 9×9 quanta of space-time, interacting with other members of its species through decametric social scales as part of a lager super organism, self-centered in one of the 9 stientific planes of reality, in which it perform those asymmetric actions of survival (aeiou:motion, energy feeding, information, reproduction and social evolution).
C: Can the being as part of a loose superorganism, which is its species transcend into a new whole in its  3rd world cycle? in very rare cases an @-mind will perform a perfect game in a friendly world and will transcend into a 3rd ‘life’ of metaphysical reality (the squared complex plane in ilogic mathematics, matter that becomes the solid central crystal or Einstein condensate state of a cosmic body, mutation that originates a new species in biology, prophet that transcends as a wor(l)d god imprinting mimetically the believers of a global religion in social systems).
Ω: And then in the largest nested superorganism we perceive, ‘ascend’ as a black star @ the center of a galactic plane, emerging as a galatom’s proton in a larger hyper-universe, in which as the immortal particle will have reach the maximal state of the game of exis=t¡ence that evolves parts into wholes we call Γ∞∆ which exists without location as we are all made to its image and likeness, without limits of entropy as it is the immortal 0-sum of all finite, fractal exist¡ences and ∞ in its uncountable ascensions through decametric scales of space-time, each of them slightly different in its details, all of them made of traveling fractal ∃xistential ¡logic points.

Thus 2 closed and open world cycles suffice for most species to close its zero sum, including æntropic man that shows little capacity to go beyond its cycle of life and death, to organize an immortal History as an efficient superorganism.

We subdivide them as the graph explains in 5й² ‘elements’, highlighted through the 3 worldcycles of Placental evolution, existential life cycle and social world,  explained in detail in further sub-posts time permitted (or for future researchers to complete), as we run in a dynamic sequential form the 3 worldcycles of the system, first seeded by a parental system, as an  informative still seed, which will follow the immanent program of existence, reproduce with the available energy, evolve and emerge from its ‘generator’ cycle as a larger whole, a 1, part of a relative, world where it will perform its 5 Dimotions=actions of vital existence to survive through the complex Dimotions of present iterative reproduction, and future evolution, in a social world of scales, which improves its chances as part of a larger whole, till entropy sets and the organism dies… but might resurrect partially in the memories of its genes and memes or even become a transcendental mind of a longer Cycle and larger Superorganism.

Thus in the 3rd line we studied in detail the ’12 Disomorphic set of properties’ of all beings, with different levels of entangled, ¡logic analysis, and examples from physical, biologic and social systems.

While the fourth line will enunciate them for each main species of each main scale, widening its analysis as I see fit, within my limited lifecycle and dwindling interest.

Secondary subposts that might study specific organic species and worldcycles in mind, time, space actions and scales.

We shall thus in this post summarize the 5С¹²somorphisms and 3 worldcycles of the ¡+1 human super organism at individual level, ruled/seeded by the language of the world in its ternary scales, topologic forms and temporal ages, in a dynamic causal way as all ‘entities’ are Generated by a seed-mind that first perceives and develops the being as a mirror of the information it codes within its self…

 

       12 ∆ST Human Disomorphisms.

When we consider humans at face value it is sad to realise that we are not different from anything else in the Universe. And yet once this ego deflation happen; when we consider the Universe at face value, it is impressive to realise that if we could reach our full potential, as the Universe has, we would be enormously beautiful, immortal, intelligent, an extraordinary species indeed made to the image and likeness of the whole.

But we don’t want to be like the whole, we want to be more, and that is our downfall. 

But this post is about man, the individual, not the wor(l)d, the lanwave of man and its worlds of wisdom. So let us stick to the point.

That we can describe the human being like any other T.œ with the same Disomorphic laws derived of the 5D² space-time dimensions of any entity of the fractal Universe, made to its image and likeness, will seem bizarre to any reader, schooled in the ‘ego paradox’ of any organic mind, which measures reality from its self-centred point of view, selecting its useful information and discharging all other points of view as accessory. Human sciences of course excel at the dismissal of all organic and sentient properties of all other monads with quite infantile, preposterous ‘myths of absolute knowledge’, from the axiomatic method (proof in human languages using the language only not experience, as in E-mathematics), to the mechanical method (only what a sentient machine measures is science). We have dealt with the meaning of truth, only contained in the 5 elements, S@≈∆ð of the being itself.

Let us then go ahead with the description of our T.œ, LIKE EVERYTHING else.

@ Ðisomorphisms 

0th Disomorphism: MONAD:  Œ-Point x ∞ World = Constant mind Mapping

Yes, we do have a rational mind, as we are called homo sapiens, aren’t we?

But the distinctive future of our mind is the ego paradox, worth to remember in more detail, as paraphrasing Einstein I would say:  ‘two things i dim infinite the Universe and the arrogance of man’.

•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception. Eyes of time.screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-14-00-12

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

º-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believers to be it all.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

In the graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

infinitesimal egos think to be ∞: mind paradox. Still languages=mappings of information≈Perception and its ∞ clocks.
We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’.

Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

This is illustrated in the graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.
Impressionists realized latter of the same thing and so they painted space as LIGHT. And now we construct digital minds which also perceive electronic light, reason why we can feel a tv or VR system as ‘reality’, because it is based in the same kind of electronic mind, which will be the pan psychic mind of robots that already move as our eye does instinctively to the red colors as natural born predators that like red, the color of energy and ‘blood’ (which hypnotizes us in gore films).

The ego paradox – a mind mirage vs. Absolute relativity.
The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view.

And so a fundamental elements of psychology which explains the astound arrogance of man to the Universe and its laws is the subjective paradox of the ego all fractal minds of the Universe follow:

‘Every infinitesimal Mind thinks to be the center of the Universe, which it confuses with its mind, self-centered in his ego’.

Only the objective mind of ‘scientists’ are able to overcome the ego paradox and realise our mind is in a buddhist sense just a Maya of the senses particle-point, a knot of time cycles communicating with the much larger infinite whole, and all is alive.

But THIS objectivity fails when applied to social sciences as it needs the common people and the people with power to accept it. And they deny it and censor human objective social scientists that ARE INSIDE the organisms of history and so can be easily denied. This is the anti quantum paradox, inverse to the quantum paradox where the observer is so huge that modifies the particle. In social sciences, the scientist is so small inside the organism of history that the ego centered powerful people do not accept criticism and prevent social sciences. And the common ego-centered people agrees.

For that reason bjectivity does only enter the mind of people who do social science. Instead they follow Tertulianus: ‘you will defend me with the sword and I will defend you with the word’.

Modern science however has gone the other way, increasing the objective view of man as a non-preferred species, NOT even in scale, as organisms of history and its memes program them. So the fractal organic Universe and its scalar 5th dimension of parts and wholes brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe; which I call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings:

It must be understood that without infinite minds-particles gauging the Universe science would NOT exist. Even quantum physics is called a gauging theory as particles reproduce, move in groups, and they do so as schools of animals as if they were checking their distances with each other all the time. So we must postulate as all philosophers of science from Aristotle to Schopenhauer did, a pan psychic Universe, which contrary to belief has been the only theory of reality in philosophy of language and science from its inception till the XX c. when logical positivism, which merely renounced to the search of a ‘why’, became the ‘standard philosophy of the mind’ , with a dogmatic postulate – that all what cannot be proved (from the human perspective and our limited perception, which does NOT include the ‘temporal mind’ that cannot be ‘photographed’ in space) does NOT exist.

 The anthropomorphic paradox in history: the ego at individual and tribal level.

When confronting social sciences we find this huge gap between objective truths and anthropomorphic selfish agendas and while we shall explain it very easily with the larger organic models of this web – as subjectivism is completely natural to any organic system that perceives reality from its selfish self-centred point of view, reason does NOT seem to work among humans, which are far less ‘free of thought’ we believe, ‘programmed’ by biological, survival needs, and ‘memetic ideas that imprint in the mind’ as ‘beliefs’.

In brief, two organic paradoxes will limit seemingly our freedom and rational understanding of history and economics, and decide if they cannot be ‘broken by objective science’ our impossibility to solve and improve the standing of mankind in history our super organism in time:

  • The ego paradox. As all minds measure reality from its perspective, things closer to us are bigger more important and better understood. So Andromeda seems smaller than our nose. We summarise the mind-ego paradox in a simple CONCEPTUAL equation:

0 (infinitesimal mind-mapping) x ∞ (universe) = C: Constant Mind-world

‘Every infinitesimal mind believes to be the centre of the Universe it perceives from its selfish point of view’.

So we don’t believe metalife exists, robots are organic and will be soon sentient, machines compete and win over humans in labor and war fields, the earth evolves from life into metal through the industrial evolution, we are not chosen of god, we are not a different species but a ladder in evolution, memes do not enslave our minds but beliefs are our selves, the planet belong to us we do not belong to the planet.

How deep is the deformation of ‘science’ by cultural dogma can only be assessed with a thorough revision of its ultimate principles. The case is rather absolute in our dominant civilisation, America, where the culture imposes ‘beliefs over reason’ as the proper mode of human thought, and equalisation of all thoughts as proof of ‘freedom’ and social bonding; and of course considers Scientific dogmas on time, space and the role of man in the Universe as SACRED truths, dividing society in those who believe the mathematical language as carrier of the truths of God vs. those who think the biblical language as carrier of Gods’ truths.

The issue is complex, as the human ‘ego’ above heavens and Earth will not yield easily to reason – humans cannot even organise themselves as a single species, but constantly break themselves into ‘tribal groups’ as if they were different species that might fight each other – even ‘individual competing units’, denying the most efficient form of survival from nations to ant-hills has always been a solid social organisation.

1st isomorphism: Fractal Generator as a superorganism tracing a worldcycle:   P$t≤≥ Te≈Si ≤≥ƒð§


Humans as a simultaneous space organism are as everything else ensembles of 3 adjacent simultaneous topological parts: Limbs are lineal, bodies are toroid heads are informative spheres. Limbs are lineal, bodies are toroid heads are informative spheres. In terms of network description they belong to the 3 fractal main systems, the digestive system the endocrine, reproductive system and the highly quantized in form, nervous system.

Fractal Generator.

The fractal generators of human beings both for individuals and history, the species are self-evident:

∆: Spe (digestive network and organs) < ST-Blood-body, reproductive sysems> Tiƒ (Informative, brain network)

∆+1: Spe (∑National Territory=Gaia) < ST-Economic system> Tiƒ (Political, informative system)

Its study and design with the laws of fractal systems is the first step of a rational social science.

 

2nd Disomorphism:  Vital Existential Constants: S,T, S=T, SxT, S/T, T/S, ∑S=T >>∆±1<<

Existential Constants: ∑S, ∏T, SxT, S/T, T/S, Œ∆±1, 5Å.

The vital constants of the human organism, are similar to all life beings, based in the maintenance of homeostasis, and at a higher psychological level they also follow the maximal function of existence, Max. E x I->E=I, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’.

 The 2nd human isomorphism: Gender s/t duality, is illustrated below in the differentiation of species.

2nd ÐIsomorphism. space-time dualities:

image071

In graph duality of female-male genders must be understood in terms of O| states of a system. Women are a balanced, E=I, present state. Male fluctuate between informative and entropic states.

One of the most fascinating elements of the fractal paradigm is the symmetry of gender, which is one of the fundamental forms in which the fractal paradigm shows its dualities of time and space.

In those terms a female species is a wave, present state of the system, balanced between energy and information. And a male species is a past-future form, where the limb-head relationship bypasses often the reproductive present body-wave state.

Sp>Tiƒ is the male state, which switches on between feeding and perceiving Sp>iƒ and Sp≈Tiƒ, is the present reproductive female state.

1151The fundamental duality of the Universe, is the symmetry of space-time. One of its most clear expressions in the vital space-time of biological beings, is the symmetry of gender. In its simplest formulation, we could state that women are cyclical, informative and men are lineal, energetic. This of course, pleases women, and I used to explain it in this biased form when i was young and attracted as it is natural in all systems, by the body of women.

Now I care nothing for attractive or repulsive forces so we shall explain the more complex truth. And define the gender symmetry in all its complexity through the ternary space, time and 5D Generators:

  • In Time, a male gender is a past-field/limbs x future head-particle system, of ‘lineal momentum’ in physics.

A female gender on the other hand is a present, wave-body system

In space therefore (simultaneous, synchronic, mental perception of the event), a female gender will have maximal evolution of the wave-body, iterative, reproductive elements; and maximal balance, Sp=Tƒ, according to the definition of present systems.

A male on the other hand, will have a maximal dilation in time, from past to future, minimal complexity of body, and lacking ‘present’, will be either an informative, past-future orientation (mental being, with informative brain which uses the limbs/bodies to that aim); or its ‘anti-particle’, of inverse ‘entropic’ nature, orientated to the limbs/energy. This is the ‘entropic’, less probability of existence, only proper of ‘death states’ and time reversals. In our society represents mainly the ‘warrior’, entropic male, violent, destructive focused in the lineal motions of its limbs. And in the present ‘entropic society’ of the ∆+1 age of death of history, the infantile version of the sport-man.

Women have an informative, ST-reproductive body of cyclical forms, and men who have a lineal, energetic body.

Their minds have – to reach a complementary balance – inverse mental functions. Women have 10 times more lineal, white, axionic matter, the site of memory and men have 6 times more cyclical, grey, nuclei matter, the spherical neurons, the site of creative integration of informative processes. Thus Women have stronger, and more balanced mentally (|-minds) and Men had to be Informatively more complex (Œ-mind). So the product of mind and body was in balance:

Thus we define:

  • Female gender: O-Body x |-Mind.
  • Male Gender: O-Mind x |-Body.

This complex Sp<>Tƒ duality explains perfectly all the aspects of both type of minds and their different psychologies.

Further on, the slight specialization of the ‘bilateral’ sides of the brain into informative(right)/energetic(left) sides, implies that women with more connections in the bridge between both, are the more balanced Sp≈Tƒ, ‘reproductive’, ‘beautiful’ species, while ‘unconnected’ men are split in 2 unbalanced sub-species: max. energy body oriented machos and Max.Tƒ, mind oriented creative artists and geniuses, proved in IQ tests distribution.

Thus female and male do have different brains, bodies and personalities, which together enhance the survival range of the species, widening our perception of the 3 topologies of reality, which is the ultimate reason of gender existence, despite its lesser ‘frequency’ of reproduction than unisexual species.

The same duality is far more stronger in the ∆-1 plane of seminal seeds: sperm and ovule as it is obvious in the pictures.

Gender and Evolution. Triggers and similarity between genes and organs.

The importance of Gender in Evolutionary variation now becomes even clearer. As the specialization of both gender in O-brain and |-body (male) and |-brain and O-Body (female) implies the existence of clear genetic variations stored in the 2 different sexes. It remains to clarify how environment ‘triggers’ the selection of more O>| female or |>O male traits according to the bias a certain environment develops for ‘stronger’ or ‘more intelligent’ species. It is clear that stress affects mutations (for example rotaries which only reproduce by female parthenogenesis become bisexual under stress), poor health and poor feeding also increases mutations.

Stronger male or female partners might become dominant in the prevailing environment, hence in the selection of genes. I am like Lamarck, Darwin (which did not know Mendel’s work) and many earlier ‘logic’ thinkers of the opinion that the ∆-scale of the individual must somehow trigger if not the exact mutation, which is unlikely, certainly a punctuated increase in mutations, observed under stress and hardship and perhaps a general direction of topological change, which mechanism we do not know – meaning that it must exist, as it happens in a drugged person, which opens its door of perception to previously shuttered information, mechanisms that trigger more mutations in the needed path.

I.e. a system that needs eye, would increase mutations on the eye genes on the topology of spherical information, a system that needs wings should trigger a higher ration of mutation in the region of ‘limbs’ – which by topological design certainly must ‘stress’ lineal motion. Thus in as much as the original genetic coding must be self-similar to the function of the ∆-scale (so for example, there is more DNA in brain cells), once the trigger increases mutation in a certain region (that of the eye or the limb), evolution along the path of the organ will increase enormously in a few generations.

VITAL CONSTANTS

The vital constants of the human organism, are similar to all life beings, based in the maintenance of homeostasis, and at a higher psychological level they also follow the maximal function of existence, Max. Sp xO ->Sp≈Tƒ, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’

 

3rrdDisomorphism: Its 3 organic/networks The 3 topological networks of man in space. Spe≤ ST≥Tiƒ

The Fractal Law differentiates further those subsystems in 3 functional topologies. For example:

The nervous and blood systems have both 0-points (Brain, Heart), toroid circuits (arteria+vein, spinal chord) & fractal, open networks that deliver energy food (alveoli) and motion orders (axons).

 Limbs are lineal, bodies are toroid heads are informative spheres. In terms of network description they belong to the 3 fractal main systems, the diestive system the endocrine, reproductive system and the highly quantised in form, nervous system.

As such all fractals of the Universe show the gender duality as it is nothing more than to classify the 3 states of the system into its two more clear balanced dualities as the wave state is merely the product of the other two states past-entropy and future information in a position of balance: SxT(s=t). While the male state will be the on-off switch between the 2 imbalanced states: maximal pas entropy vs. maximal future information.

Once this basic definition is understood, then we can consider the many aspects of the decoupling:

The 3 mind races are dominant in one of the 3 axis of languages, visual, entropic, lineal white neanderthal, mongoloid, verbal temporal, and emotional, sensorial psylocephalic black races. They determine in turn its cultural worldview: lineal time and animetal violence in white men, cyclical time and organic information in Asians and worship of life, Gaia Nature, physical, emotional and reproductive memes in black people

 

The head controls all the information through the senses. The body is blind.

 Body&limbs are slaves of Heads whose Mind-Will is expressed by ‘6’ in/out; ± senses. They are outlets of the 3 main physiological networks: Chemical senses: Taste (±E=Food) & Smell (±E: Prey-predator). Blood, reproductive senses: The 6th sense Heart, emotions (∑-social love); Tact (+St sex-dilatation, entropy pleasure; – St: Pain, in-form-ation, pressure). Informative, nervous senses: Spatial Sight, Temporal Sound, Inward ears, outward voice.

In terms of network description they belong to the 3 fractal main systems, the digestive system the endocrine, reproductive system and the highly quantized in form, nervous system.

The nervous and blood systems have both Œ-points (Brain, Heart), toroid circuits (arteria+vein, spinal chord) & fractal, open networks that deliver energy food (alveoli) and motion orders (axons).

The head controls all the information through the senses. The body is blind.

Body&limbs are slaves of Heads whose Mind-Will is expressed by ‘6’ in/out; ± senses. They are outlets of the 3 main physiological networks: Chemical senses: Taste (±Sp=Food) & Smell (±Sp: Prey-predator). Blood, reproductive senses: The 6th sense Heart, emotions (∑-social love); Tact (+ST sex-dilatation, entropy pleasure; – ST: Pain, in-form-ation, pressure). Informative, nervous senses: Spatial Sight, Temporal Sound, Inward ears, outward voice.

image053

In the graph, a deeper analysis10 of nervous control of a body and its energetic and reproductive systems. All those systems of Entropy and information are created by ternary differentiations, which provoke a mirror symmetry with the ternary differentiations of the nerves that control them. For example the digestive system has 3 sections, orientated from top to bottom on the relative dimension of informative height: the upper, mouth, informative system; the middle, reproductive stomach with its attached glands and the intestine, each one controlled by ternary sub node of nerves. Then the stomach has 3 regions; the organs that assist it are 3; the intestine has 3 sub-sections and all of them respond to lineal-energetic topologies (intestine); cyclical reproductive (stomach and attached organs), and cyclical, informative (mouth and taste systems).

If we were to make a topological, spatial analysis of the human being, we would observe that as an st-point we are made of 3 physiological networks/regions evolved from the external exoderm, mesoderm and internal endoderm, which become roughly the origin of our external membrane and senses; reproductive body organs and internal brain. And each of those 3 systems is constructed with the topological characteristics of the 3 regions of any st-point:

  • The energetic, digestive system is the bigger one, made of overdeveloped membranes and connected to the apertures of the skin, forming together an inner/outer self-similar ‘Klein bottle’ (Non-Euclidean jargon), which is the final evolution of the self-similar system we found in the Hydra. It is the more loosely connected of them all; in fact a super-organism that hosts in a ‘colonial’ form billions of external bacteria.
  • The informative brain system occupies the central singularity region, is the smallest of them all and has a highly warped, hyperbolic form, with the maximal, quantized number of cells, which form a network that relates each neuron to thousands of other neurons.
  • The blood & lymphatic, reproductive system communicates both regions, connected to the external skin through the lung apertures and surrounding the informative brain, which obtains 10 times more Entropy than all other systems, as the ‘top predator’ system of the organism.

In physiological terms we are composed of 3 st-regions and networks developed from an initial, spherical 3-layered egg that packed our genetic/temporal information and iterated billions of times to become a macro-organism. Those regions are:

– An external membrane or skin of dense informative cells, the initial exoderm, whose senses invaginated back those informative apertures in a dual parallel st-axis of height: creating the spinal nervous network – the lineal, energetic sub system of the brain that moves the body – topped by a central, cyclical, informative nucleus, the brain.

– An intermediate zone filled with glandular, reproductive cells, ‘invaginated’ by the reproductive, hormonal blood system that joins them.

– And the bigger energetic system, divided into a digestive and breathing network.

Further sub-divisions according to the Fractal, ternary Principle create the 3×3+st+1 physiological subsystems, standard in any biological book, and the st+1 brain, which has a mirror image of all of them and acts as a unit of the social st+1 scale of mankind.

So the ΣE <=>Σ2 O formalism of our fractal space-time is:

Max. E: Digestive System<ExO: Blood & Lymphatic System:exI> Nervous System:Max.O

The interaction between the st and st-1 system is clear: Those networks rule the lower st-1 cellular scale, which become a ‘herd’, whose energetic, reproductive, informative needs and birth to death ages are totally controlled by them; to the point that doctors say their discipline is ‘physiology’, since sickness are the sickness of those networks.

Further on, each of those 3 networks subdivides into new ternary structures of control:

– Max. E: Those networks have all an inner, lineal, quantized ‘body’ – a network of tubular systems that delivers informative, energetic and reproductive orders that rule internally our fractal cells. They are the veins, the nerves and the lymphatic system.

– Max.O: They all have external apertures to absorb Entropy (breathing nose and mouth); information for the nervous system (ears and eyes) and sexual sensations for the reproductive system (olphactory and touch senses).

– E=O: The 3 balanced centers, the heart, brain and genital system become the site of their ‘inner wills’ that enact and control the iterative cycles of feeding, perceiving and reproducing – the will of existence of our collective self that impel us to acquire information, Entropy and reproduce, ensuring the survival of the human form.

It is in fact possible to explain the entire process of creation of humans from their palingenetic seeds through the isomorphisms of ternary differentiation and multiple space-times as a process of creation of those 3 networks in control of the st-1 cellular systems and controlled themselves by st+1 brain and senses, which together create a living organism extended in 3 planes of existence, self-similar to all other mammals. And yet humans have a peculiarity respect to all those other animal beings: to be the most informative species of them all, with the maximal evolution of the informative dimension of height, its visual senses and st+1 10th system, the brain. We are the summit of informative evolution of life and so we shall consider how that informative evolution selected ‘us’.

Recap. The st-scale of human existence in space is controlled by the 3 topological networks of the human being, the informative, nervous system, the energetic, digestive system, and the blood, reproductive system. Each of them is divided in ternary subsystems, informative, external senses, center and lineal networks that connect them with the st-1 cells to control their drives of existence.

5th Isomorphism: Its 5 actions : ∆(a-4; ï-3; ø-2; e-1; û+1)

Those networks=actions subdivide (fractal law) in 3×4=12 sub-systems:

– ∆ï-3: Informative systems: Senses (Max. ðƒ), Nerves (ST), lymphatic, hormonal system (Max. Sp).

– ∆æ-4: actions-systems: Digestive system (Max.ðƒ), Breathing System (Max. Sp), Excretory system (ST)

–  ∆Œ… Reproductive systems: Blood (Max. Sp), sexual (ST) and endocrine system (Max. Tƒ)

–  §-Actions: Structural systems: Skeleton (Sp), Tegumentary system (ST); muscle system (Tƒ).

– û+1: While the ∆+1 consciousness of the whole is carried by the integrative Brain.

S≈T Disomorphisms. 

 

6th Disomorphism -‘ species:  $t≈ð§

 Gender s/t duality, the 8th: race differentiation and the 3rd: cultural topology.

In time Humans have evolved and diversified along the gender duality like all other forms of nature; and along the ternary topological distinction of its subspecies called ‘races’ studied through anthropology,

In graph, the ternary method (Sp-ST-Tƒ topologic, spatial speciation & 3 ‘time’ horizons of ∆ information, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c) maps out all human species from ape to race. 5D metric shows in the Min.Sp x Max.Tƒ-form of Floresiensis, allopatric evolution of Erectus – 1st technologic, verbal man.

On top finally, humans diversified in 3 races, according to latitude, specialized in space languages (Northern, dominant, dolichocephalic visual axis, dominant in Neanderthals of bigger size & eyes, today in Australoid->white races); smaller, informative, brachycephalic, verbal, temporal axis, dominant in Sapiens Sapiens, today in Capoid->Mongoloid races and SxT, black race, mixture of both, dominant in reproductive body languages along the height brain axis.  ∆+1: 3 Social cultures emerge from mind races: Verbal, Cyclic Time Asia; |-Time, warrior Europe & Ox| sensorial Africa.  

 

:

The evolution of man as a topological species in time and space shows the same ternary patterns of differentiation in species dominant in one of its 3 physiological networks, where the most informative system is selected, till arriving to the 3 human races of the mind, and its 3 gender species, male, female and child/gay mixed forms.

The 6th human isomorphism:: race differentiation and cultural topology.

 

In graph, the ternary method (Sp-ST-Tƒ topologic, spatial speciation & 3 ‘time’ horizons of ∆ information, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c) maps out all human species from ape to race. 5D metric shows in the Min.Sp x Max.Tƒ-form of Floresiensis, allopatric evolution of Erectus – 1st technologic, verbal man.

 

In the  upper graph: Humans are  superorganisms that show the same topologic varieties and ages of all systems. So there were 3 ape ‘topologies’; energetic gorilla; reproductive chimpanzee & informative Australopithecus that increased information in 3 time ages, each one with 3 homo e, exo, o varieties: 500cc Australopithecus, 1000cc erectus, 1500cc sapiens, which differentiates into a visual, spatial, lineal, larger Neanderthal; a small, informative pygmy, whose combination gave birth to the 3 races of mankind, once more isomorphic to 3 varieties, according to the dominant ST-Dimensional ‘axis’ of the brain; origin to 3 types of minds and worldview cultures:

–Spe: Neanderthal-crossed, dolichocephalic=long visual axis, energetic, white. He develops subjective, selfish, lineal time cultures (physics, Abrahamic religions) of male ‘ani-metals’ that hypnotizes his eye=I-will.

– Tiƒ: Mongoloid, brachycephalic, dominant on the ears axis (Brocca region): informative, verbal, cyclical time O-Female dominant cultures, able to ‘emerge’ as i+1 wholes through common wor(l)d bondage.

– ST: Black, machrocephalic, dominant in the sensorial/motor height axis of emotional, artistic, body cultures

On top finally, humans diversified in 3 races, according to latitude, specialized in space languages (Northern, dominant, dolicocephalic visual axis, dominant in Neanderthals of bigger size & eyes, today in Australoid->white races); smaller, informative, brachicephalic, verbal, temporal axis, dominant in Sapiens Sapiens, today in Capoid->Mongoloid races and exi, black race, mixture of both, dominant in reproductive body languages along the height brain axis.  I+1: 3 Social cultures emerge from mind races: Verbal, Cyclic Time Asia; |-Time, warrior Europe & Ox| sensorial Africa.  

 

 

ð-isomorphisms

7th Isomorphism: Its ages and evolution: Spe≤ST≥Tƒ

Our world cycle of species and individual are crystal clear and parallel in mind-thought (ages and art styles):

Humans live the same young, energetic, reproductive mature and informative old age of all living organisms, when one of the aforementioned 3 topological networks dominate.

In the  upper graph: Humans are superorganisms that show the same topologic varieties and ages of all systems. So there were 3 ape ‘topologies’; energetic gorilla; reproductive chimpanzee & informative Australopithecus that increased information in 3 time ages, each one with 3 homo e, ST, 0 varieties: 500cc Australopithecus, 1000cc erectus, 1500cc sapiens, which differentiates into a visual, spatial, lineal, larger Neanderthal; a small, informative pygmy, whose combination gave birth to the 3 races of mankind, once more isomorphic to 3 varieties, according to the dominant ST-Dimensional ‘axis’ of the brain; origin to 3 types of minds and worldview cultures:

–Spe: Neanderthal-crossed, dolichocephalic=long visual axis, energetic, white. He develops subjective, selfish, lineal time cultures (physics, Abrahamic religions) of male ‘ani-metals’ that hypnotizes his eye=I-will.

– Tƒ: Mongoloid, brachycephalic, dominant on the ears axis (Broca region): informative, verbal, cyclical time Tƒ-Female dominant cultures, able to ‘emerge’ as ∆+1 wholes through common wor(l)d bondage.

– ST: Black, machrocephalic, dominant in the sensorial/motor height axis of emotional, artistic, body cultures

800±80±8 worldcycles of human and historic super organisms

In the graph, the oldest understanding of the cycles of life, and its connection with the physiological networks and ages of a system happened in the pre-metal age of taoism, by observation of similar cycles in Nature, through the 8 baguas, which the work of this writer in systems sciences translated to modern biology and theory of super organisms, allowing the prediction of life cycles, stock-cycles, the explanation of the variations of particles in physics, horizons of species…

Humans live the same young, energetic, reproductive mature and informative old age of all living organisms, when one of the aforementioned 3 topological networks dominate.

 

In the graph, the ±800-80-8 cycles of History and its sub-cycles, which are reflected in the left for a human individual existence. They are the clock of life and death of civilizations and eco(nomic)systems.

8th isomorphism.  the world

Life is everything, as all is a spacetime organism with its 5D actions of survival (motion, feeding on energy, information gauging, social evolution and reproduction). But huminds, self-centered seek for carbon-life as the only living form. In true form, we thus talk of ‘light-life’, as the life forms which use energy and information provided by light-forces, which requires to accept as the third Earth evolves into light-mechanisms, robots with solar skins and optic minds, of 3 horizons, and 3 ages of the Earth. This is the basis of both biological and social sciences in 5D.Species can be modeled as organisms through its 3 ages that become its 3 horizons, followed either by a survival process of eusocial evolution – the summit of the process of organic evolution, which Darwin realized was necessary to explain the success of eusocial insects, or become extinct by the ‘new generation’ of fitter animal forms. in the graph we can see its 3 Horizon=ages and its ternary topology, similar to that of any other organism; and the dominant arrow of information in the height axis, of both reptile species that ended in birds, and mammals that ended in man. So happened with meta life machines, whose final species, satellites are now forming the arrow of eusocial evolution, or future mind of the metal earth -internet

 ∆±I Isomorphisms

10th isomorphism. Social scales. §10

Human Organisms evolve in social scales through 3 languages:

  1. Family, temporal, genetic languages
  2. spatial, geographic groups.
  3. Ideological, verbal languages.

 

Humans co-exist mostly in the 3 cellular, ∆-1, individual and social plane of existence, which follows the same ages and forms that the individual, albeit with longer life cycles, according to the 5D metrics:

 

1166

Let us then consider those Disomorphisms, starting from the ‘higher scales of human beings’, not the i-centered ego but the social super organism of mankind. 

9th Isomorphism: Its planes of Existence: ST±4

9th Ðisomorphism. The ¡±1 planes of  THE SUPERORGANISMS OF MANKIND

Humans co-exist mostly in the 3 cellular, ∆-1, individual and social plane of existence, which follows the same ages and forms that the individual, albeit with longer life cycles, according to the ∆ST metric:

art-ageshort

 

 

 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: