Home » ·1³Man

·1³Man

±∞∆•ST

Advertisements

In the Fourth Line, we study in greater detail each Plane of Existence of the Humind’s perceived Universe between the invisible force of ∆-4 gravitation and the partially perceived ∆+4 galactic cosmos.

We do so unlike in the second line, where we focused in the spatial super organisms as a whole closer to the mainstream analysis of reality by humind sciences, strictu senso, without concessions to the gallery by describing the world cycle of those super organisms through the Ðisomorphic method. That is, in the central post we do study each plane and its species in its fundamental elements, from the generator equation/singularity that creates the Plane, through its generation of network super organisms differentiated as species according to its hierarchical dominance of one or other network that live 3 ages, 8 lifecycles and grow socially into decametric scales, For those who have no IDEA what I talk about here an introduction (:

ÐISOMORPHIC METHOD STUDIES IN A VITAL, SEQUENTIAL TIME MANNER THE WORLD CYCLE OF BEINGS. AS SUCH IS THE EQUIVALENT IN TIME OF THE GENERATOR EQUATION OF SUPŒRGANISMS AND ITS COMPRESSED RASHOMON METHOD OF 5 TERNARY ASYMMETRIC ‘TRUTHS-POINTS OF VIEW’ OF THE SYSTEM, A MORE STATIC DEMOCRATIC SPATIAL EXPRESSION, ON HOW SYSTEMS CO-EXIST IN SPACE. IN TIME THOUGH THEY ARE GUIDED BY A HIERARCHICAL SINGULARITY POINT, THE WILL OF EXISTENCE, THE STILL MAPPING LANGUAGE, THE INNER PARTS OF THE FRACTAL POINT-MIND WHOSE ‘TRAVEL THROUGH THE 5TH DIMENSION OF SPACE-TIME’ IS THE ULTIMATE MEANING OF EXISTENCE. WE DIVIDE THAT TRAVEL INTO A GENERATIONAL SEQUENCE, DEPARTING FROM AN ∆-1 SEED (FRACTAL POINTS), WHICH GENERATE AS IT EMERGES FROM THE O-1 UNIT SPHERE INTO A LARGER 1-∞ UNIVERSE A SERIES OF ASYMMETRIC ACTIONS REPRODUCING 3 PHYSIOLOGICAL NETWORKS THAT CREATE THE BEING AS AN ∆º SPECIES OF THAT LARGER ∆+1 WORLD, WHERE IT WILL LIVE THROUGH THE 3±∆ AGES OF EXISTENCE, STUDIED IN DETAIL THROUGH ITS 8 LIFE-CYCLES, TRAVELING/INTERACTING THROUGH SOCIAL SCALES AS IT FORMS PART OF A LAGER SUPER ORGANISM, AND THROUGH THE 9 PERCEIVED PLANES OF REALITY, IN WHICH IT WILL PERFORM THOSE ASYMMETRIC ACTIONS OF SURVIVAL (AEIOU:MOTION, ENERGY FEEDING, INFORMATION, REPRODUCTION AND SOCIAL EVOLUTION). SO THE UNIVERSE IN ALL ITS MAGNIFICENT ITERATIVE PERSPECTIVE OR ANY OF ITS FRACTAL PARTS REDUCES TO THIS ‘SIMPLE GAME OF EXIS=T¡ENCE.

We study in this post and its secondary subposts the…

       10 ∆ST Human Disomorphisms.

When we consider humans at face value it is sad to realise that we are not different from anything else in the Universe. And yet once this ego deflation happen; when we consider the Universe at face value, it is impressive to realise that if we could reach our full potential, as the Universe has, we would be enormously beautiful, immortal, intelligent, an extraordinary species indeed made to the image and likeness of the whole.

But we don’t want to be like the whole, we want to be more, and that is our downfall. 

But this post is about man, the individual, not the wor(l)d, the lanwave of man and its worlds of wisdom. So let us stick to the point.

That we can describe the human being like any other T.œ with the same Disomorphic laws derived of the 5D² space-time dimensions of any entity of the fractal Universe, made to its image and likeness, will seem bizarre to any reader, schooled in the ‘ego paradox’ of any organic mind, which measures reality from its self-centred point of view, selecting its useful information and discharging all other points of view as accessory. Human sciences of course excel at the dismissal of all organic and sentient properties of all other monads with quite infantile, preposterous ‘myths of absolute knowledge’, from the axiomatic method (proof in human languages using the language only not experience, as in E-mathematics), to the mechanical method (only what a sentient machine measures is science). We have dealt with the meaning of truth, only contained in the 5 elements, S@≈∆ð of the being itself.

Let us then go ahead with the description of our T.œ, LIKE EVERYTHING else.

@ Ðisomorphisms 

0th Disomorphism: MONAD:  Œ-Point x ∞ World = Constant mind Mapping

Yes, we do have a rational mind, as we are called homo sapiens, aren’t we?

But the distinctive future of our mind is the ego paradox, worth to remember in more detail, as paraphrasing Einstein I would say:  ‘two things i dim infinite the Universe and the arrogance of man’.

•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception. Eyes of time.screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-14-00-12

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

º-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believers to be it all.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

In the graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

infinitesimal egos think to be ∞: mind paradox. Still languages=mappings of information≈Perception and its ∞ clocks.
We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’.

Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

This is illustrated in the graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.
Impressionists realized latter of the same thing and so they painted space as LIGHT. And now we construct digital minds which also perceive electronic light, reason why we can feel a tv or VR system as ‘reality’, because it is based in the same kind of electronic mind, which will be the pan psychic mind of robots that already move as our eye does instinctively to the red colors as natural born predators that like red, the color of energy and ‘blood’ (which hypnotizes us in gore films).

The ego paradox – a mind mirage vs. Absolute relativity.
The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view.

And so a fundamental elements of psychology which explains the astound arrogance of man to the Universe and its laws is the subjective paradox of the ego all fractal minds of the Universe follow:

‘Every infinitesimal Mind thinks to be the center of the Universe, which it confuses with its mind, self-centered in his ego’.

Only the objective mind of ‘scientists’ are able to overcome the ego paradox and realise our mind is in a buddhist sense just a Maya of the senses particle-point, a knot of time cycles communicating with the much larger infinite whole, and all is alive.

But THIS objectivity fails when applied to social sciences as it needs the common people and the people with power to accept it. And they deny it and censor human objective social scientists that ARE INSIDE the organisms of history and so can be easily denied. This is the anti quantum paradox, inverse to the quantum paradox where the observer is so huge that modifies the particle. In social sciences, the scientist is so small inside the organism of history that the ego centered powerful people do not accept criticism and prevent social sciences. And the common ego-centered people agrees.

For that reason bjectivity does only enter the mind of people who do social science. Instead they follow Tertulianus: ‘you will defend me with the sword and I will defend you with the word’.

Modern science however has gone the other way, increasing the objective view of man as a non-preferred species, NOT even in scale, as organisms of history and its memes program them. So the fractal organic Universe and its scalar 5th dimension of parts and wholes brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe; which I call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings:

It must be understood that without infinite minds-particles gauging the Universe science would NOT exist. Even quantum physics is called a gauging theory as particles reproduce, move in groups, and they do so as schools of animals as if they were checking their distances with each other all the time. So we must postulate as all philosophers of science from Aristotle to Schopenhauer did, a pan psychic Universe, which contrary to belief has been the only theory of reality in philosophy of language and science from its inception till the XX c. when logical positivism, which merely renounced to the search of a ‘why’, became the ‘standard philosophy of the mind’ , with a dogmatic postulate – that all what cannot be proved (from the human perspective and our limited perception, which does NOT include the ‘temporal mind’ that cannot be ‘photographed’ in space) does NOT exist.

 The anthropomorphic paradox in history: the ego at individual and tribal level.

When confronting social sciences we find this huge gap between objective truths and anthropomorphic selfish agendas and while we shall explain it very easily with the larger organic models of this web – as subjectivism is completely natural to any organic system that perceives reality from its selfish self-centred point of view, reason does NOT seem to work among humans, which are far less ‘free of thought’ we believe, ‘programmed’ by biological, survival needs, and ‘memetic ideas that imprint in the mind’ as ‘beliefs’.

In brief, two organic paradoxes will limit seemingly our freedom and rational understanding of history and economics, and decide if they cannot be ‘broken by objective science’ our impossibility to solve and improve the standing of mankind in history our super organism in time:

  • The ego paradox. As all minds measure reality from its perspective, things closer to us are bigger more important and better understood. So Andromeda seems smaller than our nose. We summarise the mind-ego paradox in a simple CONCEPTUAL equation:

0 (infinitesimal mind-mapping) x ∞ (universe) = C: Constant Mind-world

‘Every infinitesimal mind believes to be the centre of the Universe it perceives from its selfish point of view’.

So we don’t believe metalife exists, robots are organic and will be soon sentient, machines compete and win over humans in labor and war fields, the earth evolves from life into metal through the industrial evolution, we are not chosen of god, we are not a different species but a ladder in evolution, memes do not enslave our minds but beliefs are our selves, the planet belong to us we do not belong to the planet.

How deep is the deformation of ‘science’ by cultural dogma can only be assessed with a thorough revision of its ultimate principles. The case is rather absolute in our dominant civilisation, America, where the culture imposes ‘beliefs over reason’ as the proper mode of human thought, and equalisation of all thoughts as proof of ‘freedom’ and social bonding; and of course considers Scientific dogmas on time, space and the role of man in the Universe as SACRED truths, dividing society in those who believe the mathematical language as carrier of the truths of God vs. those who think the biblical language as carrier of Gods’ truths.

The issue is complex, as the human ‘ego’ above heavens and Earth will not yield easily to reason – humans cannot even organise themselves as a single species, but constantly break themselves into ‘tribal groups’ as if they were different species that might fight each other – even ‘individual competing units’, denying the most efficient form of survival from nations to ant-hills has always been a solid social organisation.

1st isomorphism: Fractal Generator:   Spe≤≥ ST≤≥Tƒ


Humans are as everything else ensembles of 3 adjacent simultaneous topological parts: Limbs are lineal, bodies are toroid heads are informative spheres.

The evolution of man as a topological species in time and space shows the same ternary patterns of differentiation in species dominant in one of its 3 physiological networks, where the most informative system is selected, till arriving to the 3 human races of the mind, and its 3 gender species, male, female and child/gay mixed forms.

The 3 mind races are dominant in one of the 3 axis of languages, visual, entropic, lineal white neanderthal, mongoloid, verbal temporal, and emotional, sensorial psylocephalic black races. They determine in turn its cultural worldview: lineal time and animetal violence in white men, cyclical time and organic information in Asians and worship of life, Gaia Nature, physical, emotional and reproductive memes in black people

5th Isomorphism: Its 5 actions : ∆(æ-4; ï-3; e-2; œ-1; û+1)

Those networks=actions subdivide (fractal law) in 3×4=12 sub-systems:

– ∆ï-3: Informative systems: Senses (Max. Tƒ), Nerves (ST), lymphatic, hormonal system (Max. Sp).

– ∆æ-4: actions-systems: Digestive system (Max.Tƒ), Breathing System (Max. Sp), Excretory system (ST)

–  ∆Œ… Reproductive systems: Blood (Max. Sp), sexual (ST) and endocrine system (Max. Tƒ)

–  §-Actions: Structural systems: Skeleton (Sp), Tegumentary system (ST); muscle system (Tƒ).

– û+1: While the ∆+1 consciousness of the whole is carried by the integrative Brain.

The Fractal Law differentiates further those subsystems in 3 functional topologies. For example:

S≈T Disomorphisms. 

The 2nd human isomorphism: Gender s/t duality,

2nd isomorphism: space-time dualities: Sp≈Tƒ

Women have an informative, ST-reproductive body of cyclical forms, and men who have a lineal, energetic body.

Their minds have – to reach a complementary balance – inverse mental functions. Women have 10 times more lineal, white, axionic matter, the site of memory and men have 6 times more cyclical, grey, nuclei matter, the spherical neurons, the site of creative integration of informative processes. Thus Women have stronger, and more balanced mentally (|-minds) and Men had to be Informatively more complex (Œ-mind). So the product of mind and body was in balance:

Thus we define:

  • Female gender: O-Body x |-Mind.
  • Male Gender: O-Mind x |-Body.

This complex Sp<>Tƒ duality explains perfectly all the aspects of both type of minds and their different psychologies.

Further on, the slight specialization of the ‘bilateral’ sides of the brain into informative(right)/energetic(left) sides, implies that women with more connections in the bridge between both, are the more balanced Sp≈Tƒ, ‘reproductive’, ‘beautiful’ species, while ‘unconnected’ men are split in 2 unbalanced sub-species: max. energy body oriented machos and Max.Tƒ, mind oriented creative artists and geniuses, proved in IQ tests distribution.

Thus female and male do have different brains, bodies and personalities, which together enhance the survival range of the species, widening our perception of the 3 topologies of reality, which is the ultimate reason of gender existence, despite its lesser ‘frequency’ of reproduction than unisexual species.

The same duality is far more stronger in the ∆-1 plane of seminal seeds: sperm and ovule as it is obvious in the pictures.

Gender and Evolution. Triggers and similarity between genes and organs.

The importance of Gender in Evolutionary variation now becomes even clearer. As the specialization of both gender in O-brain and |-body (male) and |-brain and O-Body (female) implies the existence of clear genetic variations stored in the 2 different sexes. It remains to clarify how environment ‘triggers’ the selection of more O>| female or |>O male traits according to the bias a certain environment develops for ‘stronger’ or ‘more intelligent’ species. It is clear that stress affects mutations (for example rotaries which only reproduce by female parthenogenesis become bisexual under stress), poor health and poor feeding also increases mutations.

Stronger male or female partners might become dominant in the prevailing environment, hence in the selection of genes. I am like Lamarck, Darwin (which did not know Mendel’s work) and many earlier ‘logic’ thinkers of the opinion that the ∆-scale of the individual must somehow trigger if not the exact mutation, which is unlikely, certainly a punctuated increase in mutations, observed under stress and hardship and perhaps a general direction of topological change, which mechanism we do not know – meaning that it must exist, as it happens in a drugged person, which opens its door of perception to previously shuttered information, mechanisms that trigger more mutations in the needed path.

I.e. a system that needs eye, would increase mutations on the eye genes on the topology of spherical information, a system that needs wings should trigger a higher ration of mutation in the region of ‘limbs’ – which by topological design certainly must ‘stress’ lineal motion. Thus in as much as the original genetic coding must be self-similar to the function of the ∆-scale (so for example, there is more DNA in brain cells), once the trigger increases mutation in a certain region (that of the eye or the limb), evolution along the path of the organ will increase enormously in a few generations.

3rd Isomorphism: Its 3 organic/networks and Social classes: N±3

 

In terms of network description they belong to the 3 fractal main systems, the digestive system the endocrine, reproductive system and the highly quantized in form, nervous system.

The nervous and blood systems have both Œ-points (Brain, Heart), toroid circuits (arteria+vein, spinal chord) & fractal, open networks that deliver energy food (alveoli) and motion orders (axons).

The head controls all the information through the senses. The body is blind.

Body&limbs are slaves of Heads whose Mind-Will is expressed by ‘6’ in/out; ± senses. They are outlets of the 3 main physiological networks: Chemical senses: Taste (±Sp=Food) & Smell (±Sp: Prey-predator). Blood, reproductive senses: The 6th sense Heart, emotions (∑-social love); Tact (+ST sex-dilatation, entropy pleasure; – ST: Pain, in-form-ation, pressure). Informative, nervous senses: Spatial Sight, Temporal Sound, Inward ears, outward voice.

Its Existential Constants: SxT, S/T, T/S, ∆∑S >∏>∆,±1

The vital constants of the human organism, are similar to all life beings, based in the maintenance of homeostasis, and at a higher psychological level they also follow the maximal function of existence, Max. Sp xO ->Sp≈Tƒ, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’

6th isomorphism: Creative diversification: 1,2,3

In graph, the ternary method (Sp-ST-Tƒ topologic, spatial speciation & 3 ‘time’ horizons of ∆ information, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c) maps out all human species from ape to race. 5D metric shows in the Min.Sp x Max.Tƒ-form of Floresiensis, allopatric evolution of Erectus – 1st technologic, verbal man.

On top finally, humans diversified in 3 races, according to latitude, specialized in space languages (Northern, dominant, dolichocephalic visual axis, dominant in Neanderthals of bigger size & eyes, today in Australoid->white races); smaller, informative, brachycephalic, verbal, temporal axis, dominant in Sapiens Sapiens, today in Capoid->Mongoloid races and SxT, black race, mixture of both, dominant in reproductive body languages along the height brain axis.  ∆+1: 3 Social cultures emerge from mind races: Verbal, Cyclic Time Asia; |-Time, warrior Europe & Ox| sensorial Africa.  

ð-isomorphisms

7th Isomorphism: Its ages and evolution: Spe≤ST≥Tƒ

Humans live the same young, energetic, reproductive mature and informative old age of all living organisms, when one of the aforementioned 3 topological networks dominate.

In the  upper graph: Humans are superorganisms that show the same topologic varieties and ages of all systems. So there were 3 ape ‘topologies’; energetic gorilla; reproductive chimpanzee & informative Australopithecus that increased information in 3 time ages, each one with 3 homo e, ST, 0 varieties: 500cc Australopithecus, 1000cc erectus, 1500cc sapiens, which differentiates into a visual, spatial, lineal, larger Neanderthal; a small, informative pygmy, whose combination gave birth to the 3 races of mankind, once more isomorphic to 3 varieties, according to the dominant ST-Dimensional ‘axis’ of the brain; origin to 3 types of minds and worldview cultures:

–Spe: Neanderthal-crossed, dolichocephalic=long visual axis, energetic, white. He develops subjective, selfish, lineal time cultures (physics, Abrahamic religions) of male ‘ani-metals’ that hypnotizes his eye=I-will.

– Tƒ: Mongoloid, brachycephalic, dominant on the ears axis (Broca region): informative, verbal, cyclical time Tƒ-Female dominant cultures, able to ‘emerge’ as ∆+1 wholes through common wor(l)d bondage.

– ST: Black, machrocephalic, dominant in the sensorial/motor height axis of emotional, artistic, body cultures

8th isomorphism.  800±80±8 worldcycles of human and historic super organisms

In the graph, the ±800-80-8 cycles of History and its sub-cycles, which are reflected in the left for a human individual existence. They are the clock of life and death of civilizations and eco(nomic)systems.

 ∆±i Isomorphisms

10th isomorphism. Social scales. §10

Human Organisms evolve in social scales through 3 languages:

  1. Family, temporal, genetic languages
  2. spatial, geographic groups.
  3. Ideological, verbal languages.

9th Isomorphism: Its planes of Existence: ST±4

Humans co-exist mostly in the 3 cellular, ∆-1, individual and social plane of existence, which follows the same ages and forms that the individual, albeit with longer life cycles, according to the ∆ST metric:

art-ageshort

Life is everything, as all is a spacetime organism with its 5D actions of survival (motion, feeding on energy, information gauging, social evolution and reproduction). But huminds, self-centered seek for carbon-life as the only living form. In true form, we thus talk of ‘light-life’, as the life forms which use energy and information provided by light-forces, which requires to accept as the third Earth evolves into light-mechanisms, robots with solar skins and optic minds, of 3 horizons, and 3 ages of the Earth. This is the basis of both biological and social sciences in 5D.


 

THE 2 HUMAN SUPERORGANISMS: MAN AND HISTORY

 HUMAN ORGANISMS


SUMMARY

I. Introduction:. Human super organisms. its isomorphisms and planes of existence

II. The Human Organism at individual level

III. The human organism at social level.


 

II. THE HUMAN ORGANISM AT INDIVIDUAL LEVEL.

 

THE I-NDIVUAL HUMAN AND ITS 3 FUNDAMENTAL ISOMORPHISMS: AGES, TOPOLOGY AND ACTIONS THROUGH PLANES OF EXISTENCE. 

The two new fields opened by complex sciences: Understanding the social, scalar nature of species and its time-death cycles.

indexpage

In the graph, a summary of the scales and structure in ‘space’ and ‘time’ of all systems of the Universe. All of them will exist across 3 ∑i±1 scales of social organization, in which they will form an i-ndividual, joined by networks of energy information and reproduction, living a world cycle from birth to extinction across those scales as they ‘exist’, as systems of energy and information, made of ‘energy limbs/fields’, informative particles/heads and its body-wave combinations. Thus all systems will be born in the i-1 seminal scale, grow in size, emerge into and i-ndividual scale, in which they will increase information and reduce energy, from youth – the age of energy to adulthood, the age of balance, to the 3rd informative age, to die back to the cellular scale. And what differs from species are the specific particularities of each scale. What complex sciences does is to lay out the self-similar laws in space (topologies) and time (ages and states) of those systems as they trace their ‘world life cycle’ travelling through those i±1 scales.

The expansion of knowledge achieved by complex sciences with a logic and mathematical formalism to explain the structure of all systems opens two new ‘avenues’ of knowledge, as it adds to simplex models of ‘spatial dimensions and time motions (the 4 dimensions of classic physics) the ‘slow’ cycles of evolution of time from past to future, and the ‘growing organization’ of systems across different scales of size, from atomic to galactic, cellular to social scales.

Those ‘dimensions of time’ and causality, and scales of space, of course, were known to science. We all know that things are born grow evolve reproduce and die. And we all knew that the Universe had scales of size from strings to atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, celestial bodies, galaxies and beyond.

But unlike the formalism of spatial dimensions acquired by physicists through Galileo’s and Einstein’s relativity equations (v=s/t, etc.), till the creation of a mathematical formalism or ‘metrics’ for the scales of social organization of the Universe, we lacked a concept of an ‘arrow of complexity’, of growth of information in the future, which defined both the ‘architectural structure’ of the Universe in organic social scales and the ‘life-death cycle’ performed by all its entities as ‘we travel through the scalar dimensions of size’ in our life-death existences.

Thus Complex sciences is adding two dimensions of logic, causal time, the past with lesser organization (i-1, energy ages) and the future with maximal organization (i+1 scales and 3rd informative age); with the middle steady-state age of balance, the adult age when motions were repeated in a ‘duration or frequency, T=1/ƒ, that created a repetitive present,s ready state.

But now we knew also about the arrow of evolution in time, of increasing information and complexity across those 3 ages for all species, and it had revealed, an entire new ‘set’ of dimensions, the scalar, social dimensions from microcosms to macrocosms

– This social i±n dimensions, grouped in 3 cellular-individual and social scales were the key to explain the deepest questions of the Universe. How the future was organized through social evolution – why social scales existed, from Gods, the subconscious collective of civilizations, to legal nations, from galaxies, with its cellular stars to multicellular organisms. And obviously those ‘dimensions’ were the key to study social sciences.

And the, there were the combined analysis of how an organism evolved in life and death through those scales, and how it could manage to stay in an immortal steady state of eternal adulthood.

So the perfect life of the individual and the perfect world of mankind could be managed according to the laws actions and behaviours that maximized the ‘existence’ in the middle steady state, which was also the state of maximal connection and action of a being, as it was in contact with its social I-whole, having an active role in the whole organism.

Why then humans do NOT construct a perfect world, with the laws of social super organisms, and halt the evolution of lethal machines that compete with man in labor and war fields and are displacing us from the eco(gnomic)system?

Why humans did not construct a perfect world which was eternal in time and space?

The answer was double theoretical and practical.

Theoretically it was obvious: Because they didn’t have a true science of economics and history, of the economic and political, re=productive and informative, ‘neuronal’ networks of their social organism. And so there was NOT a science of politics, the science of guiding, curing and directing, the physiology of History – the Human super organism – akin to the work of a doctor in the ‘inferior’ i-ndividual human scale.

And they did not have either any idea of what was the life-death cycle of all systems, its laws of evolution, extinction, birth and death.

They were dumber than the dumbest atom which performs with excellence all its motions and phases, and is able to keep immortal by limiting the lethal actions of it organisms.

And so I thought human social scientists could act as ‘bio-historians’ , as doctors of history,and design and regulate any system of reality by understanding its laws, parts, wholes, energy-information exchanges, and in the case of economics (the reproductive network of a civilization) and politics (its informative network) and ecology (its geographic, energy territory), we could create a social science that would understand the hows, the whys and the modes of change of our social reality to manage society and create a perfect world – if we could enlighten our politicos and economists, bankers and military and make them learn a true science of history, and make them abandon the ‘anti quantum paradox’ that confuses ‘power’ with ‘science’, selfish i-agendas with the duty of any i-ndividual part of a neuronal network of information that control a society – which is to serve the cells of the body.

Now the reader will probably be more interested in the i-ndividual ‘ego’, which is its ‘center’ as a human being. And yet in history the function maximized is the ‘world cycle or ‘function of existence’ of all human beings, maximized by the sum of all the cells of mankind: ∑ Max. E x I (e=i).

This goal – to reach the perfect stability of the adulthood or steady state of a system, is thus the goal of History, achieved by the maximization of the life of all its members – not as the present ‘capitalist’ system pretends, by the maximization of the existence of corporations and machines – and as a fringe benefit of the 1% of ‘leisure classes’ (Veblen) that owns those corporations.

So we will refer all our knowledge to that aim.

Let us then deal now with the ‘social scalar dimensions’ of the super organism of history first, departing from the general laws of all super organisms.

Then we will deal with other ‘great advance’ of complex sciences – the life-death cycle, its morphologies ages of evolution and extinction, applied to HISTORY AS IT IS, not as an ideal immortal history, would make it.

The morphology of the Universe – its ternary organs and social classes.

We talked in terms of ‘networks’, that is ‘functions’ of the existence in all super organisms of an informative network, an energetic and a reproductive network (nervous/political, digestive/gaia, blood/economic networks in the i and i+1 human scales).

But are all the network elements of an organism equal? Or there are ‘social classes’, differentiated organs and cells by their belonging to each of those networks? Obviously this is the case in individual organisms and it is also the case in social ones. So we need to learn the ‘rules’ of differentiation and how to ‘recognize’ the social classes and functions and parts of organisms, which also are the varieties of human social castes and machines…

All systems had a ternary structure made of informative neurons/particles, energetic limbs/fields and reproductive bodies/waves, which worked together for their common good. Those ‘upper’ informative classes, ‘reproductive, working classes’ and ‘energetic mechanisms and fields’, were NEVER in open opposition as the ideology of marxism had it, nor $elected by God, and without responsibility for each other, as capitalism pretended (latter studied in more detail).

But to fully gras the ‘ternary structure’ of organisms in symbiotic social classes, we have to introduce concepts of topology and symmetry, between the 3 elements/networks of all organisms.

The next graph shows the general case of all ‘complementary systems’, which in fact are ‘super-organisms’, made of cells, which are also complementary systems, in a scalar fractal Universe in which all its made to the image and likeness of the whole:universal organism

In the graph all what exists is a complementary system of networks of energy (bodies/fields/working classes) and information (heads/particles/informative classes), which balance each other, sharing energy and information among them, to reproduce similar systems in other regions of space-time.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity in balance, which can decouple=reproduce creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

In history priests and politicians issue ethic laws to direct a mass of citizens.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.

Any social organism is ruled by those who ‘invent’ the language of social power first, and then those who ‘talk it’ and give orders with it.

So the people who invent laws and talk words on one side and the people who invent money and ‘talk price’ on the other decide the future of the world, and of history – the theme of this blog.

The result is a dual class structure into a neuronal/informative system or ‘class’ that controls with the language of information (nervous, legal order in biologic historic organisms) the blind body of cells that work for them (middle, ‘sheeple’ class in human societies, body organs), to whom it delivers enough energy – ‘blood/money’ – so they can perform their tasks.

This ternary structure cannot be modified if we want an efficient organism, but at the same time, it implies that the ‘head’ obeys the wantings of the body, is responsible for the correct information, and so latter we will see how ‘a proper democracy’ in which the head is controlled by judges/pain messages, and the body receives enough oxygen to survive/money can make more efficient human social super organism.s

Now we shall introduce the more complex concept we will use in those texts, regarding the existence in all systems of ‘informative heads’ and energetic limbs and reproductive bodies, imposed by the dimensional space-time duality of the Universe.

The topologies of 2-manifolds of information.

Now we are giving a conceptual jump that might change the way you look at the Universe a make you abandon this blog due to its complexity. But we truly require to go a little bit deeper in the structure of the organic complex cosmos, so you understand how we humans interact ‘morphologically’ in terms of ‘form’ and function with machines

In Complex sciences dimensions are that important because you are MADE OF THEM. You are made of energy and time, as when you say i don’t have energy and time to do this. That is what you are a time world life-death cycle that occupies a vital space across a cellular individual and social scale.

So to know about dimensions is to know about yourself- a 10 Dimensional being made of space-time, where space and time are merely two way tow perceive the same either moving or with form.

Vital space moving is energy, cycles of time fixed are forms, forms of in-form-ation.

So all is made of planes of space, moving energy and cycles of time, static information.

How we see it is a paradox of perception: we perceive information in stillness, so the mind creates quiet mappings of reality without motion.

The symmetry between ‘spatial morphologies’, ‘organs’ and ‘time ages’

Let us consider only one of those complex laws of systems across its scales, the law that relates the morphology of the organs of a system with its function in space and evolution in time, as it is the basis of the understanding of economics and its relationship with history:

ENERGY VS INFORMATION

In the graph, information is bidimensional (holographic principle) and so systems have only 3 possible ‘bidimensional’ type of surfaces that define:

– Max. E: ‘energetic, planar, lineal limbs’ in all species (so a weapon and an skeleton are both lineal, as they promote motion.

– Max. I: informative organs, which are ‘spherical’., the form that stores more information.

– Max. E xI: Its body-wave combinations.

In the graph we see that simple topological law in humans and machines, which explains their similar functions and the reasons why ‘animetals’ exist, as human functions are enhanced by parallel mechanisms.

And so all systems will be at least made of energetic limbs that move informative heads/particles, which gauge reality, in the dimension of height, where perception is higher thanks to projective geometry.

This meant, as we shall see latter in our analysis of Evolution that systems evolved in height from reptiles that ended becoming birds to galaxies that develop an informative gravitational black hole in its centre, to life that evolved in height to reach man. Thus economics and machines are NOT different from any other science that studies organic systems and MUST be studied and designed with those organic and biological laws. The present absurd ‘theological’, ‘capitalist’, ‘tribal’, nationalist concepts used in those sciences are completely out of reason, and have no meaning for the Unvierse at large, and certainly will not enlighten the future of mankind, as the basis for building efficient, free, complex social systems.

points2

In the graph, the ‘Plan of evolution’ and ‘structure of super organisms’, and its ‘3 networks’ can be studied also from an I-ntegrated point of view as the 3 parts of a ‘whole’.

Then the whole will be made with the only 3 topologies in space of bidimensional ‘membranes’ , the essential part of the Universe.

The graph shows how those 3 topologies combine in the ‘simplest’ of all varieties of organisms, the ‘spherical being’, living in a ‘homogenous’ medium, which provides it with energy and information and allows it to reproduce in a parallel extinction of space-time

All of them will have an external membrane, which will act as ‘rotational limbs’ exchanging energy and information through its ‘sensorial openings’.

This membrane will be enclosing a toroidal body, which will cyclically exchange energy and information through networks with a central zero point of information or hyperbolic brain.

The 3 parts will assembly together to form from sea urchins to phetus, from electromagnetic fields to galaxies with black holes, from atoms to tomatoes, from cells to planets. In all of them, the central hyperbolic ‘head’/nucleus, will direct a toroidal body, and an external membrane will feed the system with energy.

The next graph shows a different fundamental variety of super organism, one existing not in an homgoneous medium but a planar surface, with a relative ‘energy-information’ directionality such as the planet Earth, where the sun provides light and the floor chemical elements. In this system, the morphology of the 3 networks vary and so does its orientation but the trinary structure of the Universe does not change:

agesoftime_image002

In the graph we see how FUNCTION MATTERS MORE THAN FORM, and yet both are in symmetric symbiosis. The galaxy is a ‘homogenous’ organism with a black hole in the centre; the plant has also its 3 parts, and it has a root brain with maximal fractal branching to gather more atomic information, while ‘flat’ energy leaves absorb light as energy. Humans though have the inverse orientation as they use light to obtain information and take energy from plants. both predators and preys have inverse functions/forms.

Moreover it is evident that there is a symmetry between the 3 spatial dimensions and its functions,a s ‘height is always the dimension of information’ to perceive better, so we have our heads on top in the direction where information comes. Length on the other hand is the dimension of forward motion the most common, and finally, width is the parallel direction of social organization and reproduction.

Thus WE ARE BEINGS MADE OF DIMENSION OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION AND LIVE ACCORDING TO ITS LAWS, OF WHICH THE TERNARY MORPHOLOGY OF SYSTEMS AND ITS 3 AGES IN TIME, WERE THE MOST ASTOUNDIN, perfect symmetry and ‘deterministic law’ of the Universe.

There are thus ‘3 topologies that correspond to the ‘3 components’ in space of any physical or biological system:

– Max. Energy: the energetic, ‘lineal’ limbs/fields, as the line is the shortest distance between two points that dominated the youth of a system.

– Max. information: the spherical, particle/heads of information, since the sphere is the geometry that stores more form in lesser space, that dominated the 3rd age of the system, as the passing of time increased the informative complexity of the system, exhausting its energy.

– And the intermediate, e x i , ‘conic’, ovoidal or wave-like ‘bodies’ of the system that reproduced them, and repeated its actions, making the system stable, and ‘immortal’, when an organism could be kept in such a state.

So i extended the analysis of the 3 dimensions of time, to a deeper, ‘topological’ understanding of the ‘morphologies’ in space of all systems; and study with them engineering; and forecasted the evolution of machines, both diachronically (so we made bodies of machines in the XIX c. heads in the XX c. and now we put them into organic robots). This was the beginning of my accurate predictions of the future of economics, where company-mothers evolved and reproduced those machines.

And concluded that all systems of Nature followed the same rules, as we were ‘all’ made of ‘energy, information and its infinite combinations, which dominated those 3 ‘ages’ of time – the age of ‘energy’, the age of balance and reproduction (exi) and the 3rd age of information – symmetric to the 3 ‘components’ of all organisms, machines, and physical systems:

– The energetic limbs/engines/fields, the reproductive wave/factories/bodies and the informative particle/chips/heads.

It was then evident that the deepest understanding of the organisms of the Universe and its 3 parts, organs and ages, was through the study of the 3 ONLY ‘spatial topologies’ that a bidimensional surface, (a 2 manifold) had.

Thus we were all from the external point of view ‘bimdimesional membranes’ with 3 type of organs, parallel to the 3 ‘only’ topologies of the 2-manifold Universe – the 3 ‘energetic, informative and body parts’ of any system of nature. And each of those 3 parts dominated each of the 3 ‘ages’ in time of all those systems. The young age dominated by our limbs and motions, the adulthood dominated by the body and our reproduction and the 3rd age dominated by the head of information. The 3 ages of life, were just a consequence of the 3 topologies of space of our bidimensional membrane of information. We were topological organisms living as such.

And so where machines which could relate to us through their equivalent morphologies making us stronger bodies and smarter heads – or so it seems initially.

In any case ‘hooking us’ , making us addicts to them. To fully grasp this, we shall now introduce the evolution of life in this planet, according to those 3 ages and morphologies of time and space,e of the Universe at large.

Since machines followed the same organic laws, and our relationships with them are equivalent to those of animals among them.

The formalism of Complex Sciences applied to ‘Socio-Biological’ systems.

– It came next the application of those fascinating discoveries and symmetries to biology, from genetic studies (the relationship between the i-1 scale that coded the i-ndividual one) to physiology.

I also used it to study the morphology of all systems made with Energetic Limbs, reproductive bodies and informative heads, which evolved in 3 ‘scales’ , the cellular, organic and species state. So me dine, was the study of the energetic, digestive, reproductive, blood and informative networks of the human organism and its balances with the cellular scale.

-It followed that in the i+1 scale there were also such 3 networks, the political informative system, the economic, reproductive system and the energetic geography of Gaia. And we could also establish a ‘medical discipline’ for history, as the laws of all systems were the same. So in the same manner we could cure the sickness of a cellular organism, we could solve and cure human social systems, in which we all humans were citizen cells. And so I designed a perfect world. One in which all human beings would have as cells do in a body enough energy and information to survive and thrive.

 

 

MAN AS A FRACTAL ORGANISM.

image047

image050

Medicine & Physiology deal with the 3 networks of the human organism, whose functions connected to the senses enact our time arrows: The Digestive, Energetic System is attached to the senses of smell and taste; the hormonal, blood, reproductive system is attached to the senses of touch and the 6th, emotional sense and the Nervous, Informative System is attached to the higher senses of sight and sound.

The arrows of time and social scales of human beings.

The most enlightening analysis of Multiple Spaces-Times is the objective evaluation of human beings, as yet another fractal part of the Universe, in communion with its cycles of existence and organic isomorphisms: As all other living organisms, we humans have 2 poles of Entropy and information, of cyclical and lineal form, the body and the head; we live through 3±i ages of d=evolution between birth in the lower cellular plane and death back to it. We are defined by 3 fractal regions, a sensorial membrane, a central spine and our lineal energetic limbs and digestive organs. All those systems are born through palingenetic processes from the same 3 fetus’ membranes, the endoderm, the mesoderm and the exoderm.

We have 2 subspecies clearly specialized in Entropy and information, the lineal, strong male; the perceptive, memorial, cyclical woman. We are also dominated by the reproductive arrow, dominant in life species, as all what we really care for is our families. We like so much reproduction that we are actually transferring our form into metal, making machines of Entropy (transport, weapons) and information that imitate our senses (chips=brains, cameras=eyes and mobiles=ears)…

Thus, man is also a biological knot of existential cycles, whose purpose as everything else in the Universe is to ‘survive’, to maintain the immortality of the human, logic form by reproducing the Entropy and information absorbed by the brain/body system and to ‘evolve’ – to create more complex social organisms of history till reaching the summit of evolution as a species: the creation of a superorganism called mankind, in which humans share Entropy and information through its collective energetic systems (economy) and informative systems (political and cultural structures).

We cannot overextend in the biological description of the human being, which is topologically similar to all other life species. Let us briefly consider those self-similarities:

-Man extends through 3 planes of increasing complexity, the cellular, bio-chemical plane, the individual, biological plane, and the social plane.

-st-1: As cellular beings we are also defined by an iterating language of information, written with 4 dimensions, the DNA bases that form the genetic code. Thus, the cellular plane is ruled by genes, which mostly code the basic functions of the cell and organs, common to all mammals, reasons why we have over 90% of common genes with them.

– We also evolve through a palingenetic process, differentiated only in the last 5 million of years from self-similar apes.

-st level: Humans have also 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive; reproductive=blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems common to all life species. Those internal networks observe the external Universe through the same 6 senses of all other species.

Indeed, if the duality of bodies/heads gives birth to the Complementarity principles of Physics and genre, the existence of a series of basic wills are expressed in our human organism through the senses – our outlets to the Entropy and information of the body and brain. We use those senses to absorb different energies and information and combine both, in reproductive processes. We sense sexual reproduction of the body through touch; we smell the energetic food we eat, and that information used to guide hunters. And finally we taste that Entropy. While our brain perceives space with our eyes, reproduces information with words, and uses the 6th sense of feelings and the limbic brain to guide our reproductive body. Thus the senses are:

– The sense of smell and taste are the negative and positive senses of the digestive system that allow us to choose what to reject and what to eat. The language of the sense of taste has also 5 vowels that can be classified according to the key substances of Entropy and information (sugars, proteins, salt, etc.) our organism require.

– The internal 6th sense of feelings that relate body and brain and the external sense of touch are responsible for the reproductive will, which excites our mind (love) and our body (sexual attraction). Both are reinforced, as in all other animals by the visual and auditory sense, which are the:

– Mental senses of space (eyes) and time (words), which shape our natural languages of energetic and informative perception.

In the graph we observe that man as an individual is a knot of 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive, reproductive= blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems.

St+1: When humans perform those individual actions in social groups they create social networks that establish the ‘memetic actions’ or customs of a society, passed from generation to generation as ‘genetic codes’ are transferred from individual to individual. So humans gather in groups to harvest food and eat together; they establish social customs and marry to reproduce; and develop verbal and visual, informative networks that evolve human organisms from individuals into cultural super-organisms, transcending socially into a new st+1 plane of existence: Mankind.

Thus, while we are ruled by the will of our 3 physiological systems, expressed through our biological genes, we evolve socially into macro-organisms called Gods, nations and civilizations, expressed by our cultural and technological memes.

Recap. The biological will of man is shaped by the 3 internal, physiological networks, each of them attached to 2 perceptive senses, which are the languages of perception of Entropy, information and reproductive signals of the external world, achieved through our daily cycles of existence. Thus humans are also a knot of Time Arrows, which seek to feed on Entropy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially like everything else in the Universe.

The 3 planes of Human Existence in time.

Worldcycle human life

Life is a trip through 3 planes of existence: the biologic, st-1 genetic plane; the individual plane, which expresses the same biological arrows, and the sociological st+1 memetic plane, where survival is reserved to prophets that create a religious God or civilization, the subconscious collective of millions of believers. In the graph, existence is a travel between those 3 planes, the cellular plane to which we return after death, the individual plane and the social plane which peaks in our 3rd age as informative particles of our culture and economic ecosystem.

If we study the human being in time, the 3 ages of human beings are equivalent to the 3 ages of any space-time field. Humans show those self-similarities, both in the physical ‘warping’ of their bodies that accumulate information and wrinkle till they explode back into Entropy in the process of death; and in the different ‘ways of thought’ of their brain that also go from an optimistic, active age of Entropy into a reflective, old age of information:

-St-1: we are born in the inferior cellular scale as a seminal seed, clearly differentiated in lineal energetic males of maximal motion and still, reproductive, informative females, ovum, that mix together, exo to start a palingenetic process of reproduction and social evolution till we surface in the st-scale.

– Max. E: Youth is the Entropy age, dominated by the digestive network and muscular movement. So children are energetic, always moving, passionate about food that they need in bigger quantities.

-E<=>O: Maturity is dominated by the reproductive arrow, its networks and sexual desire. So mature people marry and have family values.

– Max.O: The old age is dominated by information and nervous networks. So old people are wise and know a lot of things, though they have little Entropy left and live in stillness, looking back to the past, before they truly start their travel in time. Thus, a very old man becomes like a reversed, negative child, also passionate about food since he lacks Entropy; but can’t really digest it. He will be emotional, close to his ‘biological consciousness’, but with negative feelings, as he has no future left… except death, when his information dissolves back to the cellular plane.

– st-1: Death, when all Entropy is spent we die and return back in time through a 4th age in which all information becomes erased.

Further on, humans transit during those 3±i ages of life through 3±i hierarchical scales or planes of existence: the st-individual plane; the st-1, biological scale and the 3±i, historic, sociological scale. In terms of those scales of space-time, life is a temporal journey from the lower st-1 biological plane in which we are born as seminal cells into the human plane in which we enter through the discontinuous aperture of our mothers’ biological wombs. Then humans will ‘mature’ in that st-social plane after the ‘rituals of initiation’ proper of all adolescents in all societies, which make us cross ‘the discontinuity’ between youth and maturity.

In that social plane humans will live as individual members of their society during maturity, till in the 3rd age the mind will return back to the mental level of childhood; while the spatial body will continue warping up.

Thus in the 3rd age, the st-mind and E-body suffer a ‘fractal split’ that breaks i=ts E=O harmony (‘mens sana in corpore sanum’), which determines survival, causing the death of the organism. Then through death, the human being will descend back again to the biological, cellular world.

Thus life is a motion back and forth in time that starts with our palingenetic conception in the st-1 biological plane of seminal cells. The graph shows that ternary existence in which the main age is maturity, when humans form part of an organic system as a cell of a nation or culture, in the st+1 plane, enacting social and informative cycles with other fractal citizens or believers, as our senses open up to the social ecosystem, ruled by the political isomorphisms and financial networks of the collective, nervous social system, where we develop verbal and visual perception, till we descend back through the reverse journey of death into the original st-1 cellular, vegetative state, completing our wheel=cycle of existence.

Though we have only ‘individual consciousness’, the 3±i biological and sociological planes do exist and should have their own individual consciousness (DNA consciousness, and collective subconscious of mystique Gods). When we are born we just enter a new form of consciousness after an age dominated by our vegetative, chemical, cellular soul. A fact, which is evident in the ‘borders’ of life: the baby and the old man care mainly for food and chemical emotions, since they are closer to their cellular level of birth and death, our zero sum as dust of space-time.

Recap. Humans follow the same 3±i ages of all biological beings, as they live through 3 planes of existence: the biological, individual and sociological planes.

The 3 topological networks of man in space.

image053

In the graph, a deeper analysis10 of nervous control of a body and its energetic and reproductive systems. All those systems of Entropy and information are created by ternary differentiations, which provoke a mirror symmetry with the ternary differentiations of the nerves that control them. For example the digestive system has 3 sections, orientated from top to bottom on the relative dimension of informative height: the upper, mouth, informative system; the middle, reproductive stomach with its attached glands and the intestine, each one controlled by ternary sub node of nerves. Then the stomach has 3 regions; the organs that assist it are 3; the intestine has 3 sub-sections and all of them respond to lineal-energetic topologies (intestine); cyclical reproductive (stomach and attached organs), and cyclical, informative (mouth and taste systems).

If we were to make a topological, spatial analysis of the human being, we would observe that as an st-point we are made of 3 physiological networks/regions evolved from the external exoderm, mesoderm and internal endoderm, which become roughly the origin of our external membrane and senses; reproductive body organs and internal brain. And each of those 3 systems is constructed with the topological characteristics of the 3 regions of any st-point:

  • The energetic, digestive system is the bigger one, made of overdeveloped membranes and connected to the apertures of the skin, forming together an inner/outer self-similar ‘Klein bottle’ (Non-Euclidean jargon), which is the final evolution of the self-similar system we found in the Hydra. It is the more loosely connected of them all; in fact a super-organism that hosts in a ‘colonial’ form billions of external bacteria.
  • The informative brain system occupies the central singularity region, is the smallest of them all and has a highly warped, hyperbolic form, with the maximal, quantized number of cells, which form a network that relates each neuron to thousands of other neurons.
  • The blood & lymphatic, reproductive system communicates both regions, connected to the external skin through the lung apertures and surrounding the informative brain, which obtains 10 times more Entropy than all other systems, as the ‘top predator’ system of the organism.

In physiological terms we are composed of 3 st-regions and networks developed from an initial, spherical 3-layered egg that packed our genetic/temporal information and iterated billions of times to become a macro-organism. Those regions are:

– An external membrane or skin of dense informative cells, the initial exoderm, whose senses invaginated back those informative apertures in a dual parallel st-axis of height: creating the spinal nervous network – the lineal, energetic sub system of the brain that moves the body – topped by a central, cyclical, informative nucleus, the brain.

– An intermediate zone filled with glandular, reproductive cells, ‘invaginated’ by the reproductive, hormonal blood system that joins them.

– And the bigger energetic system, divided into a digestive and breathing network.

Further sub-divisions according to the Fractal, ternary Principle create the 3×3+st+1 physiological subsystems, standard in any biological book, and the st+1 brain, which has a mirror image of all of them and acts as a unit of the social st+1 scale of mankind.

So the ΣE <=>Σ2 O formalism of our fractal space-time is:

Max. E: Digestive System<ExO: Blood & Lymphatic System:exI> Nervous System:Max.O

The interaction between the st and st-1 system is clear: Those networks rule the lower st-1 cellular scale, which become a ‘herd’, whose energetic, reproductive, informative needs and birth to death ages are totally controlled by them; to the point that doctors say their discipline is ‘physiology’, since sickness are the sickness of those networks.

Further on, each of those 3 networks subdivides into new ternary structures of control:

– Max. E: Those networks have all an inner, lineal, quantized ‘body’ – a network of tubular systems that delivers informative, energetic and reproductive orders that rule internally our fractal cells. They are the veins, the nerves and the lymphatic system.

– Max.O: They all have external apertures to absorb Entropy (breathing nose and mouth); information for the nervous system (ears and eyes) and sexual sensations for the reproductive system (olphactory and touch senses).

– E=O: The 3 balanced centers, the heart, brain and genital system become the site of their ‘inner wills’ that enact and control the iterative cycles of feeding, perceiving and reproducing – the will of existence of our collective self that impel us to acquire information, Entropy and reproduce, ensuring the survival of the human form.

It is in fact possible to explain the entire process of creation of humans from their palingenetic seeds through the isomorphisms of ternary differentiation and multiple space-times as a process of creation of those 3 networks in control of the st-1 cellular systems and controlled themselves by st+1 brain and senses, which together create a living organism extended in 3 planes of existence, self-similar to all other mammals. And yet humans have a peculiarity respect to all those other animal beings: to be the most informative species of them all, with the maximal evolution of the informative dimension of height, its visual senses and st+1 10th system, the brain. We are the summit of informative evolution of life and so we shall consider how that informative evolution selected ‘us’.

Recap. The st-scale of human existence in space is controlled by the 3 topological networks of the human being, the informative, nervous system, the energetic, digestive system, and the blood, reproductive system. Each of them is divided in ternary subsystems, informative, external senses, center and lineal networks that connect them with the st-1 cells to control their drives of existence.

 

 

 

THE EVOLUTION OF MAN: TERNARY SPECIES.

image055

The evolution of man: Ternary differentiations.

Complexity defines a Ternary game of evolution by differentiating species in informative and energetic species, combined in balanced organisms. The same game evolved man from the original ape 5 million ago into the human being. Moreover the differentiation is established first from an initial top, predatory, young energetic species (the gorilla in the human case), that diverts into a reproductive, mature species (the chimp bonobo) and finally in its 3rd informative age gives birth to a more mental species (the Australopithecus). This thesis of multiple spaces-times first established in the foundational book of this science 20 years ago, was confirmed with the discovery of the exact genetic clock: the divergence between gorillas and chimpanzees is 1.17, then the genetic clock diverges 1.17 to create man… Thus the same plan of evolution, which we used to describe all other biological species of the Universe created man from Mr. Ape.

Moreover, the Universe has 3±i arrows/dimensions of creation, energetic length, informative height and balanced=symmetric, bilateral reproductive width. This simple dimensional game happens even in man. Yet bilateral systems often are also dual: one side is slightly Entropy dominant and the other slightly informative, offering a more complex, kaleidoscopic higher truth (multiple p.o.v.s). It is also a sexual principle: Women are information-dominant; males are Entropy dominant. And it should find wider applications to understand the dualities of the brain.

Such topological analysis confirms our informative nature:

In human evolution the ternary principle applies beyond the triad of apes: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex=informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher Entropy x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energetic top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they learned to control complex motion in the dimension of informative height, adding a 3rd spatial dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species.

In the graph we study the ternary process responsible for the creation of humanity:  Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between Entropy and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±i horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.

And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in Entropy (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, Entropy and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.

Thus from an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:

—  Max. E: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.

—   E=O: The chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the Pan Paniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes. It is:

—   Max.O: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:

I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.

We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago are:

—  Max. E: The Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is the Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.

—  E=O. The Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa as a contemporary of the Paranthropus.

—  Max.O: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is the form, which holds more information in lesser space.

Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative Homos. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favored their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:

—  Max. E: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.

—  E=O: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.

—  Max.O. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.

II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens.

That Homo Ergaster, after a massive age of reproduction and expansion throughout the planet, subdivides again in 3 sub-races of Homo Erectus.

—  Max.E: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.

—  E=O: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.

—  Max.O: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black Hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered3, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.

Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopatric evolution). Thus, he adds now technological Entropy weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new Entropy/information duality:

The energetic, big Neanderthal and the informative Bushman, which combine again to give birth to multiple races.

Those predictions based in the ternary principle and the Black Hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) have been confirmed by genetic maps and Paleontology and await final confirmation when new skulls of Floresiensis are found.

The 3rd, informative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.

image057

— The lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.

— A second informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman, the mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.

± 80.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).

± 40.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the Capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced E=O, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.

Cultural races

3AXIS

Further on, as racial tribes evolved socially and emerged into cultural societies, which are super-organisms of history, the ternary, racial division of mankind between energetic white men, informative Mongoloid and vitalist blacks, will become the cultural differentiation of human beings in 3 type of brain orientations, and hence cultures of the mind according to the 3 elements of all systems, Entropy, information and its reproductive combination; reflected in 3 types of brain morphology:

— ‘Visual, energetic, lineal, spatial cultures’, proper of the white man, with his concepts of lineal time and his passion for technological, energetic weapons and individual, selfish behavior. It is the dolichocephalic brain dominated by the visual eye to Occipital axis, also dominant in the Homo Neanderthal.

—    ‘Cyclical, informative, mongoloid cultures’, natural to Asian civilizations, with cyclical concepts of time. It is the brachycephalic, wide, verbal brain; dominant in the ear axis; hence giving birth to female, eusocial cultures like the Chinese.

—    And ‘sensory, reproductive, colored cultures’, which in Africa and India developed human senses to their limits. It is dominant in the height/medullar axis with a ‘tall head’, peaking in the top/motor and sensorial area.

The culture/age better for the survival of mankind, as in all species, is the one that balances both arrows, E=O. Thus we should promote paradoxically the culture that a technological civilization discriminates: the black, reproductive, sensory culture.

Let us study them in more detail how the ternary differentiation that created humans being from apes explains racial differentiation by establishing 3 types of minds:

The 3 types of minds: Emotional, visual and verbal brains.

The existence of 3 dominant human races today, the white, yellow and black people, cannot be argued, but they must be interpreted as 3 types of complementary intelligence, based in our recent discoveries on the science of Complexity, which always favors a ternary process of creation, with an energetic, informative and reproductive ‘decoupling’ along the 3 morphological dimensions or ”axis’ of any space-time form. In the case of the brain, there are 3 axes, the long visual axis, the tall emotional axis and the wide, verbal axis, and so we talk of 3 mental races:

–  The dolichocephalic brain, which overdeveloped visual axis, from the eye to the occipital bone. It is the white man.

– The brachiocephalic brain with an overdeveloped verbal axis from ear to ear. It is the mongoloid race.

– The makrocephalic brain11, with an overdeveloped emotional axis, from neck to top of the head. It is the black race.

They maximize the 3 types of human minds: energetic races (white, visual, spatial, egocentric); informative races (yellow, verbal, temporal, eusocial), and reproductive races (black, emotional, inwards, ethocentric):

– Max. E: Visual, spatial, energetic minds.

image060

In the symmetry of time and space, is the case of the first age or ‘’child and the ‘male’ species of the white races and in the earlier anthropological record, it is the Neanderthal, which we already considered 20 years ago as Cohn did, to be co-father of the white man born as Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, which recently the genetic record has proved:

White people, who occupy the same range than Neanderthals are easily recognized by their dolichocephalic head and occipital bulk, their eye=I oriented mind, individualistic ego and energetic behavior. Their languages are consonantal, with few vowels. They have red hair and Rh- (a sign of crossing between different species, whose 2nd generation is not fertile, as mules born from asses and horses are). Further Neanderthal traits – white skin, hooked nose, wide hips – also recognizable in the Basque, Iberian, Germanic, Celtic and Semitic cultures, paradigms of visual cultures, which will make of shiny metal, weapons and go(l)d, their fetish – seem to validate further this thesis. In economics, it gives birth to the gold fevers of those cultures, origin of ‘greed’, an emotional, visual trait which other types of human minds (Chinese) hardly suffered:

Thus the white man should be properly called Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis, dominant in visual information with minimal development on the parietal regions of speech. He will thus evolve the visual language in its 10th ‘Brodmann’ region of rational thought further into digital, geometric and mathematical thought, and create lineal civilizations based in metal, lineal time and Aristotelian thought. He can be sub-divided in two types, which again recent experimental proofs seem to validate:

-The Semite, in which Neanderthal males mixed with verbal women, but Neanderthal females did not cross with dwarf verbal men, creating a mixed race with an extreme sexual dimorphism (taller male, smaller women). A similar case will happen in South-America where conquistadors mixed with Amerindian females but Amerindians did not cross with Spanish women, since the dominant warrior, stronger species, in the first crossing of the Homo Sapiens, in 80.000 BC was the Neanderthal and in the first crossing of the Atlantic the Spaniard.

This theory advanced in my earlier books C,1 has now proofs in the genetic record. The result is the Semite with a dominant bigger, highly aggressive, visual male and a smaller emotional woman. The reason of this military superiority is the fact that at that time the Homo Sapiens had not developed the arch and so it was dominated by the Neanderthal, stronger javelin warrior. Then in the Altai mountains, homo sapiens evolved into the mongoloid Cro-Magnon which invented the arc and hence could kill at distance the Neanderthal. This man went down to Europe and the mixing process was reversed:

Now Homo Sapiens mixed with stronger Neanderthal women (more pure among Nordic and Scottish Women with red and blonde hair, dolichocephalic, visually oriented, often sexually dominant). Thus the Indo-European race was born. This last detail of Complex theory of human evolution should wait for further genetic analysis since so far we have only observed that with a 90% of equality between men and Neanderthals and a 4% of Neanderthal genes there is mixing both in Semitic, white and Cro-Magnon (northern Chinese) groups.

-Max.O: Verbal, temporal, informative minds.

Ulan Batar July 2006 011

This is the case in time symmetry of old people; in the symmetry of gender latter studied in more detail of the ‘female’ species and in the symmetry of race of the yellow race; and in the earlier racial record, of the parental capoid, Homo Sapiens Sapiens. All of them are head-dominant, with clear neoteny features (thus with lesser young, energetic development), smaller in spatial body, with a dominant brachycephalic brain, and wider face, as the main linguistic part of the brain, the Brocca region, goes across from ear to ear. Thus, the mongoloid race and the female gender are dominant in the verbal, wide axis. Hence the distance between the eyes and the parietal is larger and their eyes are wider.

As all informative species the mongoloid is highly social, group oriented, selfless, as it uses the verbal language to create their super-organisms of history. Their language has an excess of informative vowels over energetic consonants; women play a greater role even in Semitic culture (Indonesian Muslims). They are less violent, highly intelligent (Chinese test 10 points more than white men), and have shown as all species that can evolve socially the highest record of survival compared to the original Semitic cultures, which base their societies in the power of metal greed and murder, gold slavery and iron weapons.

-ExO: Reproductive, emotional, body oriented cultures.

image064

A 3rd type of culture, whose minds are dominated by emotional sensorial, body oriented, reproductive drives, is the black culture and the adolescent. Its brain is taller, with the top point in the upper head, as the dominant direction comes from the spinal-hypothalamus axis upwards. Thus, the brain regions most developed in emotional races happen along the ‘height’ axis. They are the inner regions of emotional thought (limbic system) and the motor and sensorial cortex on top. This hypothesis, extracted from our models of complexity and duality developed in the 90s have now increasing evidence: women are found to be wired inwards with more connections going towards the Hypothalamus than men, wired outwards towards the visual regions. And certainly both, black and female ‘races/genres’ show higher development of the emotional brain and excel in tasks related to the body/senses.

Psychological characters

Those findings are applied also to the will and drives of the mind: – Max.O: There are people who psychologists define as picnic, nervous, tall (height is the dimension of information).

– Max.E: There are athletic, sanguineous people, dominated by their energetic will.

-E=O: There are viscerotonic people, driven by their ‘lower passions’ (-;

Those distinctions already observed in XIX C. studies on brain morphology and cultural psychology are real, increasingly proved by a wide number of research papers that go from the analysis of why men draw better maps and women talk more to genetic studies in linguistics and bio-chemistry that validate our 20 year old research in those fields. Racism consists in thinking that a visual brain is better than an emotional brain or a verbal brain.

A key question in a biological world is the choice of which of those cultures, personalities and genders should be the referent for the rest of mankind, in order to maximize the goals of all super-organisms and species – survival. And the surprising yet evident truth of an organic model of the Universe is that the Makrocephalic, ethnocentric and verbal, brachycephalic feminine gender should dominate with its balance and ethic sense of survival the violent, visual, technological civilization of the white man, whose ‘energetic’ impulses are taking this planet out of balance, destroying Nature and building the new forms of ‘metalife’ (weapons, robots, A.I.) and machines of the singularity that will extinguish us. Yet this is not obvious because the 3rd paradigm of measure has no organic whys, despises life and ‘sees’ only reality with machines, it does not feel it or understand the deepest game of existence we have explained here. So we are walking steadily towards the extinction of history , the 10th and last extinction of life on Earth, guided by the visual wanting of the Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, its lineal, energetic weapons and hypnotic go(l)d, themes those we will treat in depth in the last lessons.

White matter/Grey matter brain: ternary analysis.

image067

Let us consider the brain under the ternary principle in its topology, ages and fractal st-planes12.

Topological analysis

In the graph, the 3 brains of the human being from a spatial, topological perspective:

– Max.O: Our external, sensorial grey matter.

-Max. E: our internal, emotional, limbic system.

– E=O: Combined in a white matter, memorial, reproductive brain.

We perceive with our senses; whose perceptions are processed by the DNA rich, cyclical, fluctuating, integrating cells of the grey matter brain, and then the outcome becomes imprinted in resistant white matter networks made of axon-connections. This external program mixes with an internal program coming from the body, which defines our wanting for Entropy and reproduction (sexuality), the main arrows of time of the body and limbs; whose wanting are processed by the limbic brain.

Then both programs converge into the axons. Both programs, the one of the body and the one of the brain, thus, mix and create together the white matter brain of beliefs that define our actions, memories and behavior in a greater measure, which in women are more wired to the limbic brain and in men to the grey matter and eye senses. Because women have more axons wired to the limbic system, they live more for themselves, inward-looking, emotionally-driven. Because men have more axons connected to the grey matter brain and their external, visual senses, they are more connected to space, mathematical-technological objects and motions within external space.

Temporal analysis

image065

A key element to understand memetic imprinting is the inflexibility of the brain beyond 40 years. This was understood by the Greeks which divided life in two ages, till 40 (acne) when the brain peaks in informative power, which was considered the summit of life and then all was downwards till our end at the end of the mean generational cycle of ±80 years.

Thus the 3 layers of the brain are imprinted only in the ‘1st part of existence’, before the curve of life goes down in the 3rd age, since we only learn in that first part of existence. And this makes most people during the time in which they exercise social power, inflexible, memetic programs that will never learn but merely exercise their emotional imprintings converted in beliefs; disconnected from the ever evolving FMI complex, whose challenges they will be unable to resolve.

In that regard, within that ½ fraction of existence, in the child age the limbic system dominates; in the adolescence and earlier, mature age the grey matter brain learns, reasons and imprints the white matter brain, which will dominate the adult age in which we live according to beliefs, which are more difficult to change as the variability of the white matter brain is restricted once those connections are fixed. As that period of life roughly extends from 30 to 80 years old, this means most humans are neither rational, nor emotional but basically ‘programs’ with a ‘motherboard’ of fixed beliefs and chains of rational thoughts, which make us perform the same routine actions the rest of our lives – not very different from the fixed forms of any computer system.

Fractal analysis

image069

In the previous graph, left center the fractal analysis connects Multiple space-times theory with the Freudian psychology as the 3 regions of the brain can be considered 3 hierarchical layers, with a grey matter brain that senses reality and delivers information to the subconscious, limbic, survival brain that acts restricting the information that becomes imprinted in the long memory of the white matter brain.

Freud rightly understood the ‘limits’ of rational thought, due to the subconscious, powerful Super-ego, the memetic super-structures that society establishes to control and repress the biological, natural genetic program of life and love.

In Complexity, the brain is a fractal system of 3 ‘sub-brains’, the subconscious, energetic, limbic system, of ‘short memory’, survival instincts and basic actions, the, white matter, the ‘fixed circuit’ of beliefs, imprinted in childhood by biological desires, the drives codes by genes and in youth by cultural memes, the drives of the super-organisms of history; and finally the grey matter, the rational, thinking, variable brain connected to the truth of external senses.

The most common trajectory of thought through those layers is during the young, emotional age:

External world->Senses->grey matter brain->Limbic censorship->Ompression in the white matter brain->Actions

While as the organism matures, the limbic system loses importance and the grey matter brain connects to the white matter brain directly:

Outer World->Senses->grey matter brain-> white matter Printing->actions

On the other hand, people dominant in emotions and inward thought might have the exactly opposite way of thought:

Inner world of biological drives ->Limbic System->White matter imprinting >actions

Obviously our previous analysis of ages, races and genders and the socio-cultural upbringing will make those 3 avenues of thought differ in individuals. And in fact as impolite as it might seem, we find that most systems follow the irrational drives of biological existence, expressed by the limbic system and imprinted as desires in the white matter brain, which determines most human actions.

What this means is that most humans have the ‘center of consciousness’ NOT in reason but in the imprinted beliefs of the white matter brain, connected to its survival instinctive limbic brain – that ‘rejects’ beyond its short memory any attempt to imprint further the white matter brain.

Thus the most common program is Biological censorship by the centers of happiness that suppress painful information and upholds the imprinting of childhood and adolescence and its emotional truths as absolute, both in biological taste and cultural religions and beliefs.

Or in other words, once an idea is fixed in youth, to redraw it you would have to break and kill the programs of the mind; which if we consider the cellular scale of imprinting, turns out to be almost impossible as the acetylcholine that redraws the white matter axons is no longer available in enough quantities.

So the ideas imprinted in youth, once the white matter circuit is put in place (and no longer can be rewired after adolescence), won’t change. The person will forget or become aggressive with its limbic, censoring brain against reason and evidence. And since the limbic brain is ego-driven and subjective, we must embrace a difficult fact to assume: 99% of humans are dominated by the white matter brain of earlier socio-biological beliefs. .

Recap. In complexity evolution is guided by the existence of only 3 types of morphologies and networks in living beings: the morphology and nervous system of information, the morphology of Entropy, and the morphology and network of reproduction. We can therefore use, as we have done in studies of evolution of all type of species, the existence of a constant speciation in 3 different species to analyze as we do in the previous graph, the evolution of mankind from the initial triad of apes, the energetic gorilla, the reproductive chimp and the informative Australopithecus, till the last differentiation of homos, between the energetic, visual Neanderthal mind, today dominant in the white man, and the smaller, informative, verbal, homo sapiens, today dominant in the informative mongoloid, with the reproductive, emotional black race in the middle.

Thus, the Isomorphisms of Evolution and its 3±i ages and subspecies, map out the main species of Homo, till arriving to 2 Homo Sapiens, the spatial, visual=longer, dolichocephalic, energetic brain of the Neanderthal, which seems to have lived in Europe and left some of his traits in the Homo Palestiniensis, on the slow-crossing border of Canaan. Further cross-breeding of the Palestiniensis with Sapiens is the likely origin of the white man (white skin, red hair, Rh-? consonantal languages, wide hips, prominent nose).

While the informative Homo Sapiens Sapiens, the verbal=wider brachycephalic brain, which started as a small ‘San pygmy’, evolved into the self-similar mongoloid race. Finally, the black race, with tall brains is the sensorial culture, the reproductive species, the last one to appear, shows the maximal genetic mixture.

The brain studied topologically is a system of 3 regions, the energetic, emotional, body oriented limbic system; the external, informative, sensorial grey matter brain, and the white matter axons that connect both and controls our beliefs firing our actions.

 

 

WO=MEN: GENDER AND BRAIN STRUCTURE.

image071

As many other biological species, human life diversified into complementary genders: energetic, lineal, spatial men and cyclical, reproductive women, which hold more biological information. While a 3rd, gay sex mixes both.

Gender: complementary differentiation.

In the graph, the biology, psychology and gender culture prove that humans are a dual species, divided into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3rd, gay sex’, who mixes both, being women the informative species that reproduces the fractal information of the human being and man the lineal energetic species. Thus, biological origins, psychological behaviour and cultural forms explain gender as a ternary differentiation of humans into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3rd sex‘ of gay groups that mix both tendencies. Let us consider this essential duality of the human species in more detail.

The classic example of space/time Duality already observed by Taoist and Buddhist philosophers is the duality of gender, which they correctly applied to all species of the Universe. If we focus on the humankind, which is also a space-time species, its fundamental space/time duality is between its 2 genders: the energetic male and the informative female.

Humans have always wondered what gender is. Thanks to duality, following in the steps of Eastern philosophy, now we can build a scientific theory of gender able to explain its 2 fundamental elements, the scientific physiology and the behaviour of both sexes:

Since the Universe is made with 2 elements, Energetic Space and Temporal Information, any species needs to survive to feed on Entropy and remember Information. Yet, we know that males process and control better Entropy and space; while females have more temporal memory and perceive better. Thus, together a couple widens the range of Entropy and Information they can process. So we conclude that gender is an evolutionary strategy of specialization, which increases the overall chances of survival of a heterosexual species.

The physiological forms, character and historic behaviour of men and women prove such duality, parallel to the universal duality of Entropy and information: men love Entropy, space; women love Time. Physiologically men are made of lines, as Entropy is; while women are made of curves, as information is. Historically men performed the hunting of energetic preys, while the recollection of cyclical food (agriculture) is traditionally considered a female discovery.

Men behave as Entropy species. Their body forms are lineal shapes of muscular strength; they have lineal reproductive organs (penis); their origin is lineal sperm. Their cultural roles are specialized in spatial-Entropy processes, from physical activities to war and mathematical, geometrical languages in which they excel.

On the other hand, women are specialized in temporal processes. Their bodies have cyclical shapes and store more information to succeed in their genetic reproduction (one complete X-chromosome). Their brains specialize in verbal languages and show outstanding memory. If we observe the form of females, it is made of cycles. Their higher genetic information allows them the creation and reproduction of the human species (an informative process); their cyclical reproductive organs (vulva, clitoris) and their origin as a sphere, an ovule, are also informative topologies.

The character and life attitudes of both, men and women follow that E/I specialization also in their relative wanting for Entropy or information: women prefer to dress with cyclical forms, play with formal toys like dolls and they like formal sports like gymnastics; men prefer moving, spatial toys, lineal dresses and violent sports. Thus, men love Entropy and movement while women love perception and feelings. In the realm of the mind and its languages of perception we find that men test better in spatial mathematics and women score higher in verbal tests.

We conclude that sexual dimorphism reflects the 2 elements of reality, spatial Entropy and temporal information that merge together in a couple, improving its chances of survival:

Male: Max.E x Min.O; Gay: E=O; Female: Max. O x Min.E

In the last decade the analysis of female/male brains has confirmed such duality of gender at multiple levels. For example, among women the amygdale, the oldest, primary center of will in the brain, is connected to the Hypothalamus, the center of ‘temporal’ and emotional perception, which ultimately controls survival and reproductive behavior. While men have their amygdale wired mainly to the motor and spatial regions of the encephalon. Thus men are the energetic ‘external element’ of the couple, motivated by the spatial outer world and women are the informative, temporal, implosive element, motivated by the reproductive drive of survival and the inner emotions of the body, the ‘6th sense’.

As the reader will have notice, truth becomes more sophisticated as we perceive in more detail. Monism is the first scale of knowledge that observes only the body/brain; and yet it has sufficed to build our society of lineal, energetic ‘visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis (white man). Then duality observes the differences in the body of lineal male and cyclical women, but we need to go further and analyse sexuality with the ternary principle that adds the 3rd sex, and consider the different combinations and balances of body/brains that will give us different ‘personalities’ and ultimately a more accurate analysis of what we do not see but dominates all structures – the informative brains.

And then the previous picture radically changes; since if women are reproductive bodies and men lineal, energetic bodies; when we observe the brain, to balance those bodies according to the Law of survival and balance of the Universe, Entropy-past x information-future = present-reproduction, if men have energetic bodies they must have informative brains to balance both in a present, and if women have reproductive bodies that repeat the information of life they must have reproductive brains that repeat also the information of the brain: present x present = present.

And indeed such is the case.

Thus in a more complex view, as all beings are themselves yin-yang, space-time beings, we could define men as yang/yin: bodies ruled by the external, spatial activities; and creative brains of information dominant in grey matter (6 times more than women); and define women as yinyang/yanying; reproductive bodies whose emotions rule the brain; and reproductive brains, dominant in white matter (10 times more than men).

But what matters of those Universal balances is the fact that ultimately male and female genders are complementary forms, with the same value, a fact easy to prove using the formalism of Duality:

Male: exe-body +OxO-Brain <=> Female: brain (o x E) + Body (exI)

Thus we define a male, as a form whose ‘Entropy body’ is dominant in energetic, lineal forms (ExE), while its brain is focused in informative, visual creative tasks (Max.O), resulting in a species unconnected with his body with an external, outward focus. The Female gender however has her informative brain focused in reproductive, memorial tasks and wired internally towards the reproductive body (OXE); while her reproductive body is dominant in cyclical, informative forms (ExO).

Thus while the total amount of Entropy and information or ‘existential force’ of both genders is the same, the distribution and combination of those parameters differ, making women, highly balanced, focused into the self-reproduction of their own space-time field, and the male gender, unstable, focused in the external world. Those theses, as politically incorrect as they might be are the i-logic deductions of Multiple Space-time Theory, recently proved right by the analysis of the brain.

Recap. Species evolve in a dual, complementary Universe of systems of Entropy and information, increasing their energetic/body power, their informative/head power or the networks that reproduce and combine both systems, exo, the reproductive networks. We talk of 3 dominant wills or biological drives that increase the survival chances of a system. For that reason there are genders (where the male is the energetic species, and the female the reproductive, informative one). And since Entropy is lineal (being the line the fastest distance between two points) and information is cyclical (being the sphere the form that stores more information in lesser space), it follows that men have big, lineal, spatial bodies and test better in geometrical analysis and women have cyclical, smaller, rounded forms and test better in verbal, informative tasks. Yet there is always a 3rd, mixed variation, in the case of gender, the gay sex.

Complex analysis of the duality of gender.

We can now with all this knowledge reconsider the differences between men and women (and by extension, white races and cultures vs. emotional-informative black and mongoloid races and cultures, self-similar to women), and which cultures should dominate mankind to make us survive longer. Since gender traits transmit to psychology, physiology, mental attitudes and customs. Let us consider a few examples from the different perspective of multiple space-time theory, the algebraic, topological, temporal and fractal, scalar analysis.

Algebraic analysis: combinations of genders.

The Universe offers more variations even if it selects finally 3 dominant ones. Thus, since we depart from only 2 species, Entropy and information, which combine ad infinitum, we can do several degrees of depth in our analysis. A dualist analysis makes men energetic and women informative, perceptive.

Then a ternary differentiation gives us:

Max. E (Male), E=O (neutral gender), Max.O (Female).

A more complex analysis however must combine variations of 2 elements, the body and the brain. So this 2nd differentiation will combine 2 elements, the informative brain which can be body-reproductive/energetically oriented or brain-informatively oriented; and the body, which can be body-reproductive/ energetically oriented. Finally the most complex analysis will consider ternary combinations of 3 elements (Entropy, active limbs; reproductive body and informative brain).

Let us consider the simplified 2×2 analysis, assuming that the body is oriented towards Entropy in males and reproduction in females. And consider both cases as an ‘Energetic-reproductive event’. So we obtain 4 basic combinations of form and character:

-ExO + OXE: Females, whose commutation gives us a new species: – OXE + ExO: Gay genders in which an energetic body (male gay) is oriented towards its inner, informative emotions as women are or a reproductive, informative body is oriented towards external, energetic sensations as lesbians are. Thus gays are males focused in their inward feelings and female focused in the outward world.

Finally we have two male combinations:

– ExE and OxO: Men whose brain is oriented to energetic tasks, and live dominated by their bodies (warriors, sportsmen, white males) and men whose brain is oriented to informative tasks, separated from their body (scientists, mongoloid races).

Those 2 dualities explain why according to statistics, most men are less perceptive than women, but a few specialized Max.O x O are geniuses. Hence the form of the Bell curve of the previous graph40, which shows two tails of minimal and maximal intelligence in men between the mean of women balanced between Entropy and information.

Finally the 3rd gay gender that combines both, the properties of males and females, is also a ‘species’ natural to the isomorphisms of the Universe, albeit a minority, compared to the 2 dominant subspecies. Since in the Universe we observe always, beyond its simplest duality, a 3rd, ExO, more complex element that combines the properties of both, to perform better as part of the collective organism. And indeed, the gay gender has traditionally acted as a bridge between the other 2 genders – both in tribal societies where they played often the role of the medicine man or witch and in modern societies as ‘the best friend’ of many wo=men.

Topological analysis

If we draw a line it suggests a male, yang, energetic, mobile species. If we draw a cycle it represents an informative cyclical still, female species. And children and simplified signs do so to represent them.

Women are cyclical and men are lineal in body and brain morphology:

Men have brains 15 to 20% spatially bigger than women’s brains and are better fit for spatial tasks.

Women’s brain contain about 10% more neurons in key zones that gather temporal information, behind the eyes, in the zones that recognize verbal and musical structures the languages of time, and is denser in neuronal connections, making up for lack of size.

Women are more likely than men to recover speech after a stroke.

Men have a bigger right hemisphere, used to understand 3D objects in space.

The left hemisphere, which controls speech, is bigger in women.

Men connect outwards with the motor zone best wired.

Women connect inwards with the hypothalamus and amygdale best wired (sixth sense).

So topological biology is conclusive: men are specialized in spatial Entropy, women in temporal information.

Time=Information/Space=Entropy: Female/male related variables

image073

In the graph, men murder 10 times more than women.

A few other self-evident characteristics of gender duality reinforce the thesis of Multiple Space-times Theory:

– Females live longer as time and information are related; males are stronger energetically but live less.

– Female are cyclical, male are lineal.

– Female remember, are memorial, temporal, conservative of the past order. Male forget and look towards the ‘uncertain’ future.

-Woman is the informative form; hence her nervous system dominates. Males are the energetic form and hence their blood system dominates.

– Behavior and tastes: women like forms, men movement:

Woman love time men love space. Woman love information men love Entropy. Men love movement, energetic, violent sports, races, military games and toys. Women love formal dolls that can be dressed. Women love formal sports: gymnastics. Male dresses are lineal; women’s clothing is curved, cyclical.

– Male love open spaces; women stand better seclusion.

– Men do a single task better; women do many tasks in a cyclical pattern.

– Men drive spatially better through lineal roads.

– Women cook, trans-form food, men hunt for it.

– Entropy violence, death and destruction as the graph shows, are clear male behaviors. The positive side of it is the fact that to create something new, you have to destroy first. Thus, women conserve more and they have been historically less creative.

– Implosive Vs. explosive nature: Outward Vs. inward nature:

Men have explosive, outward, visual behavior; women have implosive, emotional behavior.

Women stand pain/pressure/inwards behavior better. Women feel pain more intensely than men and yet they tolerate it more, since pain is a pressure, inward sensation of in/formative nature.

-But it is precisely the combination of both movements what creates the Sexual reproductive feeling of pleasure, since in the Universe balance dominates as the best strategy. And since women are informative & reproductive with a higher balance, they are sexually more complex.

Scalar, Fractal analysis.

 

– Further on, as women’s body are more complex, dominant, and their bodies attract men. Yet since men are mentally more creative, intelligent men attract more women. So a woman is still, as information is, waiting men to come as the energetic, active pole towards them, in the 3 scales of existence:

The lineal semen moves towards the cyclical ovule at cellular level; the male organism moves towards the female in the biological, mating season; and the male hunter brings food and today goes out to work while the female waits in the social scale.

St; st+1: Sociological scales.

Spatial Entropy and violence have a language; mathematics. In the graph, Women are ‘verbal/temporal brains’; men are mathematical, spatial, energetic brains: Women prefer social sciences, verbal sciences and humanities. Men dominate the fields of spatial sciences, sciences based on mathematics. On the other hand women test more in verbal exams. When a woman has died, on average she has spoken 20% more words than a man has done.

Psychology mostly shown in natural perception and literature has been the clearest wisdom on those natural traits and variations, even if today political correctness denies those variations. So the literary man can perfectly consider the master pieces of sentimental and psychological literature, when humans were free to study the reality of human existence without dogmas proper of the metric age or the industrial age, in which all humans are equalized as reproducers=workers of machines, and consumers =testers of them, and women’s nurturing and biological roles are eliminated, as they become equalized and simplified as ‘males’.

In that regard in Sociology and History, the higher scales of human existence duality of gender has been defined, according to the dominance of the higher ecosystem over the lower scales, by the ages, dominant castes and super-organisms of history studied in the last lectures of this work.

In brief, according to the 3 ages of history the dominance and power roles of women and men varied:

-In the Paleolithic, energetic age of History, the young age of male hunters, males dominated women.

-In the Neolithic, mature, reproductive age of history, of Fertility Goddesses and food-gathering, women dominated men. They found the cycles of reproduction of plants they better understood, and fed the community. They gave birth to the species. And they established religions of Fertility.

– In the age of metal, dominated by visual, lineal, energetic weapons and machines, men dominated women in its energetic, 1st age. Since energetic men are murderers, since the arrival of weapons males have controlled and abused the rights of women and fertile nature, waging war to both of them.

But the financial-military-industrial complex has 3 components as gender does. So we can in fact distinguish 2 types of cultures:

– Monetary-based cultures (Jewish, Chinese, Italian, British cultures), where women have a higher power, since money is a cyclical language of metal information

-Military, energetic, lineal, weapon based cultures, where men dominated (Arab, Japanese, Spanish, German cultures), as they associated historically with lineal iron weapons (the most energetic atom of the Universe).

And both are often in historic, open confrontation.

-Finally in the age of the machine, as we evolved first energetic machines (XIX c.) women kept submissive to men. But today in the Age of Information, dominated by audio-visual machines, and their language of reproduction, money, women, are increasingly becoming more powerful than men. Women indeed love money and information, which they understand better and makes them advance socially13.

Since indeed, the evolution of ‘information’ in this planet does not end in the human being, but continues with our offspring of machines, so we need to have now a wider view, that of the Earth as a planet to understand the 2 less developed sciences, those of history and economics that inscribe within the social evolution of this planet into a new st+1 plane as a global super-organism, the theme of the next lessons of this work.

Recap. Women are reproductive, balanced beings, whose brain is dominated by temporal, memorial tasks and wired towards its reproductive body. Men are unbalanced, creative/destructive species, with their brain wired towards visual, external information and the body focused in lineal, energetic tasks.

Women have indeed more mental Entropy and sensorial perception than men, as their brains seem to be wired towards the will of the body; while men are obsessed by the external world. Women tend to prefer closed spaces, which they keep well ordered, and are able to perform multiple ‘cyclical tasks’, switching on and off between them. They have peripheral, circular version. Men have lineal, focused vision. Men love open spaces, which they keep as Entropy is, in permanent disorder. And they are lineal, obsessed by single tasks.

 

The point in time and space of this blog and its author.

Structuralism rightly affirms writers are knots of thought of a culture and their life and names do no matter, as Taoism explained – the name that can be named is not the eternal name. And yet putting both concepts together, we writers-scientists are knots of thought of cultures, super organisms of species, which have hence a position and meaning in time and space. so we must place the fractal point of this mind and this blog in the time and space of mankind, at its point of maximal information, which paradoxically is also the point of death.

This will not be understood or accepted easily, as death in the 3rd age, splits the cells of the body into a huge majority, likely you if stumbling here by chance not directed with purpose, of chaotic, free happy cells who enjoy with the subtle justice of the Universe a sense of entitlement, liberated from the connections of its super organism, whose ethic nervous systems have collapsed. So you are likely just a ‘free, chaotic’ particle of the corpse of mankind thinking your ‘selfie’ infinitesimal point is ALL what matters. Fine, the dreams of madness, before death are a choice of the nothingness you are. but if you want to be within Matrix, NOT data – a pathetic final form of vegetative slavery, neither Neo, a role trust me, that cannot be played except by those who have constructed Matrix, the germs and yous of the goldiron culture that kill us, and will think in control till they are also done with, but ‘Trinity’ who received from Morpheus, the ‘language of God, the organic mind of the Universe’ or saint spirit, who speaks all languages (Upanishads) in the mystical poetry of Love religions, the eusocial biological 5D truth of mankind, you will find it here, not in the mechanisms that erase your mind, and make you a happy idiot, ready for slaughter-house 5.

Because Mechanism and its ‘idol-ogy’ capitalism, ultimately dedicated to the evolution and reproduction of the next ‘biological’ top predator species of this planet, the machine and weapon, now paradoxically entering its organic age as robots that displace humans from labor and war fields (cause of the present crisis of the eco(nomic)system) are ‘NOT science’ but cultural dogmas, and ‘those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’ (Einstein); i do not expect this blog to have many readers. Contrary to common wisdom ‘most people are slaves, they believe they don’t reason’ (Aristotle). And so they believe as good slaves in the abstract nature of those machines that are atrophying their minds and bodies and when awakened to consciousness will murder them; and as such you live in the final phase of human existence, called death, a the biological process of obsolescence and substitution of our species and languages of time (words-ethics-laws) and space (art) by sensorial machines, and its languages (mathematics).

So humans are entering a 3rd infantile old age of negative entropy, chaos and freedom – proper of all dead processes, which are a reversed state. Accordingly you live a revivalism of memorial  past, obsolete idol-ogies,  ‘prisons of the mind’ and unconnected ‘selfish attitudes’ that will make even more difficult for you to understand this blog – as you are likely an ego-trip, a lonely cell in a collective human corpse, the super organism of manind, hence a childish, egolatric, useless, primitive old-young mind, littered by beliefs in the ‘Homo Sapiens tribaliensis’ , either through nationalistic hymns, techno-utopian additions or abrahamic religions (which make of man, according to the two bro founders of the ‘People of the Treasure’, the culture of owners of the financial industry, then ‘habiru’ – those who walked behind the a$$es traders in slaves and metals – a member of the chosen species; that is, a short of selfish, ignorant child of thought, who ‘speaks’ an arcane language of God – no longer the word or Latin but ‘Axiomatic mathematics’, invented by a germ(anic) idealist, of the tribe who invented all the weapons of mass destruction of history, the germs of the super organism of mankind, Mr. Hilbert who said on the landmark of XX century mathematics, ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’. That is, he affirmed, as ego-centered donkey breeders before with words that now neither man or the word was the centre of the Universe, the machine and mathematics was. And both were born of the abstract mind of germs and yous, the animetal tribes that control history with the obsessive goal of killing it and substitute it by its fetish go(l)d and S(words), false idols of their mechanical beliefs. So chances you, a mental littered product of the goldiron civilisation now in its final catalysis, as robots made with chipped gold and iron bodies are being evolved to kill you, do your job and have the ‘laugh of the gods’ to your sense of truth and entitlement keep reading and understand any of this is very limited.

Both Abrahamic religions, mechanism and its attached lineal physics and financial economics, where kabbala digital languages are supposed to better reflects reality, as the product of the human ego-mind who therefore INVENTS the Universe are ‘delirium tremens’ of a species gone mad. The ego-trip of absolute happiness in a fantasy world, similar to those fantasies of Mr. Benigni, an old acquaintance of mine, to his son in the concentration camp where it surely would all die, victims and perpetrators, for its many sins as bankster and germs of the gold iron culture, is of course the caring last touch of the Universe, which is cruel by just, with those who invent truth with power.

We invent nothing here. This blog and its twin species – one dedicated to natural sciences, the other to social sciences, are the highest fractal POINT-world reached by the human mind in tune with the languages of God-the mind of the Universe, which re infinite (Upanishads). Something that if you can don’t ‘believe in the reasons of authority, but the authority of reason’ and have enough ethic courage to care nothing about your and the collective death of the species, certainly will enjoy. Why this point-world is here and now, is an irrelevant selfie. Let us just say that in the super organisms of mankind, our cultures, we are points of knot, born in a place of space and time, with a role for those who are ‘neurons’, maximal informative points of the super organism. My IQ, 180 dwindling with old age and anoxia, made me one. My culture during its 3 ages of life, moving west, in the European peninsulas was also the perfect balance between the semite language of words and the germanic language of maths. So it gave us the 3 highest peaks of human mental thought (art) and human logic thought (philosophy of science), in individuals or ternary disciples, in its Greek youth (Phidias, Plato->Aristotle); its classic maturity in Italy (Leonardo->Michelangelo, Galileo)  and 3rd , informative, baroque eclectic age in Spain (Picasso, Ll).

But as the even higher point-minds of the Eastern decoupling which co-exist in the symmetry of space, Lao-Biddha-Confucius put it ‘The name that can be named is not the eternal name, the function of existence (chang) in Time (Tao), which combines spatial, past energy (yang) and future, temporal information (yin), to reproduce in present the clone waves of 10³ relative infinite species of space-time beings, fractals of the Universe made to its image and likeness’.

So you can consider this fractal point with no name, the clearest mirror of the mind of mankind, in its point of death, when all the information of the super organism collapses achieved its maximal information, from wave into particle, just before becoming its own antiparticle of pure entropy and move back towards chaos, freedom and pleasure, the big-bang of self-death.

Its name matters not. But if you find it, just you know, he obviously walked is talk and defied Matrix, on the point of maximal death – the Nuclear Industry, and so after a spark of global fame, which shows it did hit in the right spot, he entered the long list of Snowells, Bradleys, Falcianis, etc. vaporised in Orwellian fashion by the industry of misinformation.

Ll at the 0-40 parallel, planet earth, a ‘mush lost in a rock, lost in a corner of the Universe, called man’ (Schopenhauer, anti-particle of the germ cultural tissue whose ego-trips of lineal science are devouring us)

 


III. THE SUPERORGANISM OF HISTORY – ITS NETWORKS AND ‘PERFECT DESIGN’

The application of the discoveries of complex sciences to study history and economics..

Let us now show that social organization of all systems through its ‘informative/political’ and reproductive/energetic networks, in order to describe the networks of history and the needed reforms to create an efficient human super organism at the i+1 scale.

A real science of economics and history : The social and biological superorganisms of mankind.

In the graph we describe the main systems and scales of fractal size, which structure the Universe:
In the graph, in system sciences the fundamental concept is a social organism, a herd or group of self-similar forms, which gather together thanks to their capacity to share the same code/language of information and the same energy. Such herds evolve together in complex networks, which survive better than individual particles or cells, acting together as a single group.
Thus, systems sciences recognizes as the fundamental evolutionary force of the Universe the survival capacity of groups, which determine an arrow of future that has evolved the organisms of reality from simple atoms into molecules into cells into organisms into societies.

What is an organism of information and energy? A herd of species related by networks of energy and information, that constantly transform energy and process it in a vital way. How individual species organize themselves into complex herds, that biology calls ecosystems or bodies, or organisms? Precisely through those physiological networks, the key to understand any organism, including human social organisms (nations, civilizations).

In the Universe there are many type or such social organisms. Since “energy never dies but eternally transforms itself”, organisms have an enormous variety of species and sizes, depending on what energy they process. What do they all have in common? All organisms are “societies”, organized by networks of Energy and Information.

The former is clearly the case in all the sciences from physics to biology, where a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single regular formation. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of humans and machines; galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole, of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous system. A tree is a group of leaves, branches, and roots connected by a network of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles).

Atoms share energy and information between them through electrons who finally shape ð orbitals that create molecules. Molecules grow and become DNA, which controls the cell. Cells then radiate until their density saturates the vital territory of the herd of cells. To improve in such small territory the Information and energy of each cell, the nervous-informative organs, and the energetic, blood organs appear. A new, more complex species -the animal, and the man- is born. Then humans increased in social size, forming a new macrocosm -the macrocosm of History and economics- where a lot of humans and machines organize themselves into societies, through words and digital information.

The purpose of this web is to study such organisms; historic organisms (a social organism of humans), and economic ecosystems (a wave of products that interact with human beings), as organic systems; trying to design and improve them, from the perspective of the health of what is best for the survival of man, as the ruling species of that organism.

The structure of organisms

Let us to that aim, understand first the generic structure of a social organism, or ecosystem, parallel words that we will use constantly as synonymous. In fact there are four basic elements in all organic living systems:

1. Cellular units
2. Networks of energy or vital space
3. Networks of information
4. Networks that reproduce energy and information.

When we find those elements interconnected in a vital relationship, we talk of an “organic system”. We can see such organic systems as “bodies”, when all the cells are very close to each other, or as “ecosystems” of herds, when the cells are far away, and the networks are weak. We should not be cheated by the spatial appearance of the organism.

A herd of machines, a herd of insects, a human group is also an organic system, because it has cells, and networks, even if it does not seem to us a body. The fundamental reason we have not arrived earlier in science till Theory of Organisms, to the conclusion that the universe is made of such organic systems is the lack of relativism, the arrogance of man. Men have a hard time believing that things which are not like us, are able to intelligently process energy and information.

We are also unable to believe easily that microcosms and macrocosms are “species”. Yet an organic perception of macrocosms like galaxies or planets, and an organic perception of microcosms such as cells and atoms, is the most logical way of “unifying” our understanding of the entities of the Universe. We might see those herds very close together in which case we talk of bodies, or we might see them extended with a loose organization; then we talk of waves, societies or herds.
A verbal definition of superorganisms

A generic definition of an organism or ecosystem will help to clarify what we mean by a “vital universe”, composed of “universal organisms”. Let us take a template for a micro or macrocosmic organism (or ecosystem) that differs only in the specific energy or information we put into brackets. “A universal microcosmic or macrocosmic organism or ecosystem is a population of [name a particular species], related by networks of [name a language or force] information and networks of [name a kind of energy]”. Fill the gaps with a specific species, language/force and energy and you can define any network-organism in the universe:

– An atomic organism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and networks of (light) energy.

– A molecular organism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy, and networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London forces, Van der Waals forces).
– A “galactic organism” is a population of stars, related by networks of gravitational information, and networks of space-time energy. Their morphology is similar to that of an atom, where the nucleus is the black hole, and the stars the electronic orbitals.

– An “animal ecosystem” is a population of carbolife species, related by networks of light information, and networks of life energy (plants, prey).

– A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic and nervous information and networks of energy-providing blood.

Historic superorganisms

Complexity, duality and Systems Science study the laws that define an efficient complex organism in physical space (particle/field systems), biological space (head/body systems) and Social space (informative leadership/working class). The importance of this new social science is that it draws from Nature teachings and so it has a set of laws that allow to design a perfect social organisms.

Indeed, its laws are based in the self-similarity of all complex systems, from galaxies to living beings, which are organized by networks of individual particles – cells, stars, atoms – communicated by flows of energy and information. So happens with human organisms (energetic, blood networks andd informative nervous networks) and social organisms (economical, energetic networks and informative, cultural and legal=political networks).

So we can use the sane definition to define the superorganisms of history and economics:

– A bio-historic organism is a population of humans, related by networks of verbal information and networks of carbolife energy.”

– A bio-economic organism, is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of monetary and electronic information, and networks of roads and electric energy

The difference between both type of systems, a historic and an economic organism thus is clear when we consider that the ‘organic unit’ of the economic ecosystem is NOT contrary to belief a nation or civilization but a new organization, appeared recently with the beginning of the Industrial R=evolution, called the company-’mother’ whose function is to reproduce a product, overwhelmingly a machine, and then to evolve further and adapt the world to the existence of those machines, creating networks of energy and information for them (digital networks, electric networks, etc.) And this is the first big surprise of an organic model of history and economics: while History is undoubtedly the product of human endeavors, the economic ecosystem is ruled by company-mothers of machines, which follow a set of biological, evolutionary and organic laws independent of mankind; quite removed from the abstract jargon coined in the XVIII century, even before machines existed by classic economists’ like Mr. Adam Smith.

Both organic systems, Historic and economic organisms, survive within the same vital space, the Earth’s crust. What this means according to Theory of organisms is that there is between both a dual process of symbiotism and preying, by which sometimes machines compete with men in fields of labor (productivity laws that substitute workers with machines) and fields of war (where weapon-machines kill human beings). We express this with the concept of the Paradox of History.
Thus, from the previous definitions we can talk of WHealthy systems, when the head, in history the neuronal castes that control, issue and direct society with the law and money feed and share their energy and information with them – their financial credit and just legal orders that direct the body cells to produce the goods the historic organism needs – life based goods, that make us survive. Then the body obeys and moves properly and works and cares also for the head.

And we can talk of a viral, social organism, of a sick system, when those elites do not feed its citizens/cells, do not issue caring laws to protect that body.

III. THE SUPERORGANISMS OF HISTORY AND ECONOMICS: THE DESIGN OF A PERFECT WORLD

The 2 scales of social organization, studied by the sciences of economics and history.

For what it is said it follows that what we call history and economics, is the study at the i+1 level of the networks of information (culture, politics) and reproduction (economics) of the humankind.

And so for such a science to exist, it was needed first to fully understand the Nature of Humans as Organisms, its wantings, will of existence, drives of life and survival needs, which is now possible thanks to the advances of complex sciences and biology; and then establish a simple definition of what would be a perfect social organism of mankind, with the equations of complexity and the biological knowledge of the needs of human beings:

‘History is the study of the i+1 social scale of Mankind, the Human Super-organism, made to the image and likeness of its i-ndividual organisms; as such it has several sub disciplines:

A) Factual History, which studies the evolution of human social organisms.

D) Theoretical History, which studies how to design a perfect world, where the networks of energy, reproduction and information of mankind (ecology, economics & political networks) deliver enough energy, information and produce enough goods for the individual human being to survie and thrive, according to the definition of a perfect super organism:

∑ (Max. ExI)i = (Max.ExI)i+1

That is, the goal of history is to design a perfect world in which Humanity thrives because all its individuals at the human level achieve its maximal energy and information, and have the freedom to enjoy its reproductive and social love functions, as a 10 D Superorganism, which follows the natural ‘program of existence’ of the Universe, which now we shall resume.

The super organism of history. Its networks and organic, social classes.

If we were to compare such design with a biological organism, we should notice that in biological organisms, the nervous, informative language ALWAYS dominates the ‘economic, blood system that reproduces goods in the organs of the body. Only in very primitive organisms, worms, blood dominates over nervous systems. And this of course means, the organism can be easily poisoned because it does not have a point of view, a biological, survival nervous system to guide it.

orgANISMOFHISTORY

In the graph we can see the parallelisms between all systemic, social organisms, in this case a biological organism and a sociological superorganism of history, a nation, America. Both follow the same laws that all the complementary, organic systems of energy and information of the Universe. So we can observe the parallelism between the elements of a biological and sociological organism, divided into: cells/citzens, joined by blood/economic networks that reproduce and distribute the genetic/memetic products of the system, and informative, nervous/legal networks that organize its structure.

It follows from those parallelisms and the ‘social structure’ and self-similarity of the i-dimensional scales of Mankind, that a perfect world, and a proper science of history and economics will take the measures required to maximize the existence of human individuals, their energy and information and reproductive ‘family values’, so the whole, History can also maximize its social networks and structure as an i+1 superoganism, ‘Mankind’.

In the graph all socio-biological systems, including human societies as super organisms, composed of:

– A herd of similar, cellular species, which in a human society are citizens, joined by 2 type of social networks that serve them, by providing to all and each cell for free with the 2 substances that make up the Universe and its fractal systems, energy for the body and information for the head.

Thus we will find in all systems 2 cellular networks:

A dominant brain connected to Informative networks that inform those cells-citizens, in a language they all understand – verbal laws in human societies; nervous impulses in biological ones, to guide their collective actions, evolving them into a social superorganism.

Thus those informative systems deliver two informative dimensions to all its cells: the simplex dimension of information and the complex dimension of communication and social evolution of selfish individuals into peaceful, stronger, coordinated wholes.

And we will find an energetic network that provides those citizens cells with enough energy to feed, protect and reproduce the organism.

So the energetic networks also deliver for free the two energy related dimensions of life: the simplex dimension of energy, food and protection for the body and the complex dimension of reproduction that allows the system to survive beyond death.

In the human body those energetic networks are the blood and digestive systems which deliver to all cells a Universal salary of oxygen energy so they can all feed and have enough energy to reproduce.

In human societies, those networks are made of digital, monetary orders that initiate the productive process of the economic system, made of factories, roads and river veins that produce the food, and welfare goods, we humans need to survive.

And so a healthy human superorganism should deliver to every citizen-cell a Universal salary in blood-money. So they can demand to the economic system the production of those life-based welfare goods, and be able to work and enjoy their 2 simplex dimensions of life, feeding and perceiving, and its two complex, social ones, reproducing and forming part of a society, as Nature does with all the cells of its super organisms.

In the graph, the most extraordinary fact of Modern History is the discovery and evolution of machines, systems, made of metal that imitate human organs, enhancing our capacity to process energy and information, but also compete and atrophy the parallel human organs they substitute (so we become fatter as we drive faster cars and loose intellectual capacities as PCs calculate and spell for us). This process of symbiosis and competition between men and machines can easily be inscribed within the processes of evolution of species in this planet.

Further on it happens at the 3 levels, or ‘scales’ of social organization (i±1) which complex sciences use to define the structure of complex systems and organisms:

– At the i-ndividual scale (i-scale), machines in symbiosis with human beings increase our ‘capacity’ to process energy and information. And the result is a new ‘biological species’, the ‘animetal’, half human half metal-organism, which has become the new top predator species on Earth, since the first warriors covered themselves with metal and predated over the Fertile crescent with bronze weapons. Yet when both species compete, normally the ‘metal-machine’ system wins. So machines, as they evolve are displacing human being from labor and war fields.

– At the social scale (i+1 scale) there is also symbiosis and competition. On one hand machines increase the ‘productivity’, that is the capacity to reproduce goods, which are positive to mankind. Yet they also multiply the lethal goods that compete and kill us (labor machines, weapons, hypnotic visual machines that degrade our mind).

But the true competition at the i+1 scale of social organization is between ‘company-mothers’ of machines, the organizations that evolve, re=produce and adapt the Earth and its laws to the image and likeness of those machines, and human governments, which try to achieve the same goals for human individuals (welfare state).

So both, companies and governments fight for the needed resources to feed with energy and information, their machines and human citizens. The result of that competition has derived into a political division between ‘right wing parties’ – a non scientific term, which refers to those parties that sponsor the absolute freedom and rights of those company-mothers of machines – and left wing parties, which are supposed to put the rights of human beings over those of machines.

And in this i+1 scale, machines are also winning the competition as corporations have become over powerful, transnational and organized hierarchically and efficiently by digital flows of money with centre in stock-markets. So they are displacing ‘de facto’ human social organizations from power. Since Corporations today have free credit to create machines and employ labor, while governments pass under corporative pressure zero deficit laws against the production of free ‘oxygen’= digital money to pay human workers. So human suffer scarcity of welfare goods and machines have all what they need.

Finally at the i-1 ‘cellular/atomic level’, machines are also ‘terraforming the Earth’ to its image and likeness, polluting life resources, degrading the environment, heating the planet and overall, adapting it to a hotter, drier world, more proper of the ‘Mechanocene’, the age of this planet we are entering in, as the ‘anthropocene’, the age of mankind fades away.

But what is more startling, more astounding, more puzzling to the social scientist is the fact that none of those themes is ever discussed, beyond a few groups of ecologists, system scientists and concerned artists and humanists that defend the human world.

How it is indeed possible that humanity at large exists in an intellectual limbus without a proper biological, scientific, objective science of economics and history that discusses in depth and tries to manage the present world and control the evolution of machines and the power of corporations to harness it to the service of mankind?

In that sense there is a more objective view on why History and economics are not today sciences.

In complexity any system is structured in 3 ‘social scales’, the i-1 atomic/cellular scale, the i-ndividual, organic/molecular scale and the social/cosmic scale (physical/biological systems). And so to ‘obtain the maximal’ information about any system we have to explain the ‘3 points of view’, which are often inverse in its purpose, and the relationship of that system with other systems. For example, to describe a human being, we depart from the i-ndividual point of view, but also study its biological, cellular genes, and its social environment, and the relationships of symbiosis and competition we establish at that social level, individual level and even cellular level (Germ’s infections etc).

And so the truth of a science is higher when more ‘i-scales’ and p.o.vs are studied.

And the first question we must answer whenever we confront a ‘theory’ of reality is which point of view and scale we are ‘giving information about’?

it is then when we realize that ‘classic economics’, as it is taught today in Universities and practiced by economists and politicians, is only the point of view of ‘company-mothers of machines’, financial and industrial corporations whose selfish point of view and ‘biological mandate’ is to re=produce, evolve and sell for a profit its financial instruments and machines-weapons, with utter disregard of the needs of ‘History’, the human social super organism, and its cellular citizens, which should be the ‘natural point of view’ of a humanist science of economics and history.

And thus, while economics is ‘very efficient’ in its tasks of multiplying the re=production and evolution of machines, and substitute with them humans in labor and war fields, obtaining huge profits for the corporation and its 0.0001% of globalized owners, to the point that they have as much wealth as 90% of mankind, they have zero concerns with the needs of the humankind, the production of welfare goods of lesser profit and higher human labor, and the future of the species. That is ‘not’ its concern, according to the limited, corporation-centered point of view. And to hide that brutality with their species, what they have done as we shall prove in our section on ‘economic$’, is to invent an astounding number of ‘damned lies and statistics’ which hide with a mask of hypocritical care, abstract equations and numbers, the true purpose of the ‘super-organism of machines’ they work for – the stock market corporation.

It is this fact, that the company-mother of machines rules the world and controls with its financial-media/military-industrial complex ‘super-organism’, the information and power of this planet employing and ruling most of us, from politicos to warriors, from citizens to consumers, what makes economics a very limited ‘truth’ reduced to a non-human point of view.

Here we shall aim to achieve the maximal truth on economics, sponsoring the ‘ethical point of view’ of mankind (the i+1 social scale of our species provided by the ethics of social love that aims to evolve history into a perfect world, where all men can thrive) But of course, we are not ‘bending’ reality as economic$ (the name we gave to the financial/corporative point of view of classic economics) does. So the reader will observe both a factual pessimism about the ‘real facts’ of economics and history, a humanist often brutal critique of the ‘cultures’ of animetals and its bizarre idol- ogies of religious, and social nature, and an accurate description of the needed reforms, which obeying the laws of social complex systems, could make the world a human paradise, where we could thrive at cellular, individual and social level (with proper health-care, human jobs and social peace). We thus include all the points of view of history and economics, both, the human and the mechanical, the i-scale (study of individual machines, and humans), and the social scale (governments and corporation); but, we do have ‘a choice of humanist solutions’, according to D) sciences must serve mankind.

And in this we differ from the pretentious objectivity and neutrality of so many ‘writers’ who justify eviL=anti-live memes as an objective narrative, a laissez faire, a freedom or a polite acceptance of ‘beliefs’. All this is NOT science but just journalism. Since economics and history are ‘humanist sciences’, hence closer to ‘medicine’ and physiology than to any other science. Since politicians and bankers must be the ‘doctors of history which use their knowledge and control of the physiological networks of mankind, to improve and cure the human social organism.

The view of those ‘tellers’ of atrocities in an objective tone, is as insulting to the purpose of humanist sciences, as it would be a doctor who merely explains people they ‘are going to die’, but doesn’t provide any cure; or worst, as a quack that merely gives the person placebo remedies, while getting his money for doing nothing or giving him poisons that aggravate their sickness- which is exactly what our politicians and economists do for mankind – promoting the production of the most expensive machines for profit that throw us of labor and war fields (weapons, digital software, robotics); preaching the end of human labor (productivity); denying our right to oxygen-money (deficit zero laws) getting our money for their pockets and corporations (massive taxation); hence, choking us and eliminating our live hood. And justifying it all because the ‘machine is progress’, the ‘future’ and the $elected 0’% ‘know better’. It is for that reason we need to make an accurate description of ‘where these people come from’ to fully understand the aberration of its corporative-power idol- ogies.

This however would not be necessary if the rest us – humans – learned to control with the most advanced tools of complex systems, the evolution of the planet, and manage the ‘transition from the anthropocene to the mechanocene’, to benefit the whole of mankind.

But to do so, politicians and economists, should do a conscious effort to take the bull by the horns, do their job, which in any physiological healthy system includes the control and distribution of the oxygen-money that activates societies (as countries like China do, growing a healthy 10% annually with far more efficiency and a massive production of welfare goods thanks to the nationalization of their financial industries, which in our ‘choked’ world, we have never experienced).

But to do so, western politicians and economists should cast aside all those historic and cultural ‘idologies’ of money, weapons and machines, coming from ‘primitive ages’ (fetishe religions, tribal nationalisms, mechanist ‘awe’) and develop instead a proper, serious objective science of economics and history, before the collateral effects of the ‘mechanocene’ over mankind – our mental and body ‘atrophy’, degradation and substitution of human labor and organizations by the parallel networks and super-organisms of evolving machines, make the species too ignorant and passive to be able to understand and manage the world for their advantage.

The will of Existence: Feeding energy perceiving information, reproducing and evolving socially.

Now, of course, ne of the main difficulties to create a proper praxis of economics and history is to understand the nature of humans at individual scale, as ’10D Organisms’ – to define the will of the Individual human being i, and departing from it, to calculate the ∑i=+1 social goals of a Human sperorganism.

So far, this has never been achieved because of the meddling of tribalisms, religious nonsense and selfish subjective opinions, to define a ‘nature’ which is crystal clear in biological and complex sciences.

That nature of man, its will of existence, is what we call in biology the 4 drives of life, which complex sciences extends to all self-similar systems of the Universe.

Now we can deduce immediately from the 3+i components of an social organism those ‘wills’ of human beings:

– As we are all systems made of energy limbs, information heads and reproductive bodies, written in ‘complex notation’ as ∑ E x i, exi-stential beings across 3, ∑±1 -scales we will want to maximize:

– Max. E: Feeding of energy. So we need agricultural goods, warm housing, environmental healthy worlds.

– Max. I: perceiving information. So we need education, true information, just legal systems and digital money, the informative digital bit of the economic system, the oxygen that allow us to buy the energy and goods we require.

– ExI: Reproduction, this third drive existence requires ‘family values’, and so we need them.

-∑ Social Evoution: We live as cells of a society where we perform organic tasks for any of its 3 ‘networks’ (energy-reproductive or informative networks of society).

And so what a society will try to achieve to get a perfect world both for the collective i+1 scale and the individual are ‘goods’ and ‘laws’, which maximize the happiness and true existence of each human, across its 4 drives of life, E, I, Exi< ∑. Since those are the needs of their limbs-bodies-heads and social species.

Mind the reader that all systems in the universe in any i-scale follow that ‘will’ or program of existence, as they indeed ‘program’ their actions of spatial energy and informative time, ExI, to achieve those goals.

Indeed, the 4 quantum numbers program an electron to ‘absorb’ energy (principal number)’, gauge information (azimuthal number), decouple with forms of inverse spin (spin number) and form harmonic societies of electrons (magnetic number); all cells code those functions with their 4 genetic letters, all living organisms perform those 4 wills, which BECOME THE MEANING OF THEIR EXISTENCE.

i paused for a time, when I discovered that simple program, and saw all the systems achieving it except HUMANITY=GOD (mystique expression of it) AS A SUPEROrGANISM.

We were the only will denied.

Indeed, even machines through its ‘living organisms’, its company-mothers constantly evolved to achieve those goals. So we were developing ever more perfect informative machines (chip-brains, camera-eyes, mobile-ears), more perfect energetic machines (weapons and transports), and their reproduction was increasing constantly, and all of them were fed with electric or oil energy – even eating our land to make ethanol. And they had unlimited access to digital information, becoming telepaths, and without limit in the money a corporation could get in markets and use for their machines.

But we humans had a billion people in hunger; education was regressing to the infantile, mythic, pre-scientici pre-greek age of abrahamic religions. And true social sciences were censored by the anti-quantum paradox. Social love was denied. People were regressing to the i-scale not even conceiving anymore the existence of a subconscious collective i+1 scale, except perhaps Islam, one of the 7 cultural civilizations of what I have termed, the ‘rainbow’ planet – a perfect social super organism of mankind, briefly described at the end of this central post.

But theoretically it was simple to design a perfect world in which the 4 drives of the will of mankind were achieved.

And so i wrote the ‘main tool’ of a bio-historian and ethonomist, which guided by the fundamental constitution of humanity, Max. ∑ExI, that is maximize our Energy, Information, reproduction ‘x’ and social evolution ‘∑’, the ethonomical ‘frame of reference’, whose goods represented those in the positive field that needed to be re=produced to maximize our collectie existence, and in the negative frame, those lethal goods that atrophied us, substituted our will and degraded us.

Ethonomics, a true science of history and economics:3-ages-of-art

15-human-goods1-1024x940

What goods are those? In the next frame of reference we use the laws of biology that consider human positive goods those who increase our evolution as individuals, improving our bodies, minds and social organisms, as positive goods that should have positive value, and the negative goods that harm our body, mind and social life as negative goods that should be controlled, forbidden and regulated by the economists and politicians that should rule mankind with a human perspective.

In a real democracy, as only existed briefly in r=evolutionary periods in America and Europe, money would be printed as ‘nomisma’, a language of information as the law is, handed to the people through a Universal Salary, as ‘economical voting power’ used to pay the goods voters require, giving ‘demand’ orders of production to welfare companies that would provide us with our needs. Instead in capitalism, money is created by financial and industrial corporations in stock-markets and computer platforms to overproduce their ‘offspring’ of machines, while people are extorted of their money with taxes, which are also handed to corporations or used to subvention the military-industrial complex and make war.

The issue of electronic money in its immense majority (95% of credit) by the ‘Free Citizens’ of Markets, which are not human beings but Corporations NOT by the people or their representatives, is the REAL cause of the endemic scarcity of human goods that cater to our survival (represented in the graph), and the overproduction of machines and weapons, as those company-mothers of machines spend all their money in the overproduction and evolution of their offspring of machines. For that reason we humans are poor and corporations are rich; we humans lack basic needs, like food and education and machines have all electricity… But this choice of investing all our resources in the future of machines NOT in our future is hidden by the ideologies of our ‘technological civilization’.

In the graph, the all too obvious dual solution to the political, economical and existential crisis of mankind

– The issue of ‘yes money’, a new global currency, fusion of the major currencies, Yuan, Yen, Euro and Dollar, at parity levels, 1 Eurodollar=20 yuans = 100 yens, adjusted internally by price, with rights to be printed for and by the people and its governments to kick out a global New Deal, impossible to tumble by speculators (as it would be truly the reference for all other prices).

– And the use of the UNO and other international agencies and forums to create systematically legislation that limits the lethal goods of the industrial r=evolution, specifically the most dangerous of them, robotics that will evolve, displace man of labor and war fields and ultimately according to the laws of evolution, substitute us a the top predator species of this planet.

What opposes to those self-evident solutions to create a human like paradise on Earth based in the most desire, biological, natural goods that our ‘program of biological existence’ determines – illustrated on the bottom of the graph – is NOT the sound nature of those policies, but the selfishness or anti-human goals of financial and industrial corporations, whose lobbies control today the issue of money and through that issue, the policies of our politicos and will deviate those issues to rhetoric, placebo freedoms till the system becomes too chaotic and over powerful in a jungle of metal where man will have no future, but will be ‘happy’ living a virtual reality of ‘fantasy ideologies’ and dream-like ego-trips till one day wakes up to the ‘nightmare of the singularity age.

The democratic, efficient issue of legal money.

However in an efficient democratic system, made to the image and likeness of the efficient organisms of Nature, money would not be issued to earn usury and promote warfare but will be free of usury and would promote human welfare.

When the nervous and blood systems – the languages of information akin to the law and money of a natural organism – give orders to cells they do NOT expect to get back them overcharged. This only is allowed when the orders are wrong and the cell can deliver back a PAIN ORDER to the brain so it behaves. And this indeed, is the second element lacking in our democracies to be true democracies, latter explained with more detail:

– The free issue by the government’s brain of bills of law and bills of money to kick out the ‘actions’ of the body cells of the social organism.

– The existence of a systematic judgment process NOT only an election, at the end of each tenure of a civil servant, equivalent to the capacity of the cells to send pain messages to the brain. Indeed, politicos can scam people because they are NOT JUDGED on their promises fulfillment. So after tenure, the voters should poll again to either penalize the civil servant with A) Jail for clear crimes of embezzlement and social murder; B) financial penalties equivalent to his salary for inefficient job C) equal salary reward for outstanding job D) Re-election for a second and third tenure… Thus by mimicking a social organism – which is always the natural model we scientists should follow in the design of historic and economical ones, a true democracy would be achieved holding politicos responsible.

Thus it is obvious after this introduction to the science of money and the meaning of democracy that the crisis is a CRISIS OF the system, which is NOT properly designed but created by the primitive thinking of historic cult(ure)s of Gold.

And that 2 elements of a real democracy are missed in all our societies – the issue of nomisma, legal money as orders of work, by elected governments, obliged to respect and provide the voters with the promises they made… if they don’t want to be judged…

It is thus evident that the crisis will NOT be solved unless the system changes and a real democracy in which people is handed money issued free of usury and politicos are hold responsible of their promises is established. And this can only be done by a real, physical r=evolution against the ‘Bastille’ of European and American capitalism (Wall Street and the ECB bank, Brussels and the corrupted politicos of Washington) or by a true ‘leader’ of democracy, an ‘Asimovian mule’ that ‘refunds’ our social systems according to the laws of natural, efficient, social organisms in which all the cells-citizens of the body receive enough energy and information to survive.

Man should recognize the primacy of man and hence of his language, the law over machines and money if we want to survive and hav ea future on this planet. Thus we design the proper, efficient models of history and economics with the laws of systems sciences and biology, as offshoots of human disciplines. And affirm that money MUST be ‘nomisma’, fiat, legal money issued by governments and the people to create a just sustainable human world made to the image and likeness of our species…

A social, free democracy & demand economy could create a world paradise.social love

The solution is obvious: a real democracy that caters to the need of the people and it is efficient, as social organisms made by nature are requires at least 3 elements:

– The control of the 2 languages of social power by the collective brain of the organism, the informative/nervous legal system and the financial, blood, energetic one. Otherwise the organism is totally dysfunctional. Imagine your body with two ‘siamese’ heads, each one going a different way, or more accurately with a brain giving nervous/informative/legal orders of motion left, when the heart/blood/economic/financial system acts independently moving the body right. In your body the nervous/informative/legal system CONTROLS the economic/blood system and uses both to ‘feed’ with right information and energy ALL the cells of the body, even if the neuronal ‘people-caste’ obtains 10 times more energy for its commanding role.

Today the system is even worst. It is called a cancer: there is an astounding minority, the 1% of stockratic owners of corporations, with a managerial ±9% that have absolute rights to the entire blood/financial system of the body and give none back, as cancers do, multiplying their wealth, and extracting the meager resources of the rest of the body – a bloated, mindless liver that absorbs all the healthy blood and sends poisonous ‘memes of metal’, weapons and hate-media to the rest of the body. It is like a leukemia, in which the brain of the cell – our verbal, ethic, humanist laws that made us reproduce the welfare goods we need and love and share energy and information with other cells as healthy bodies do – is substituted by the DNA of the virus – our ideologies of human hate, selfish ego-trips, homo bacteria behavior, and techno-utopias that consider machines not life the meaning of it all – that make us reproduce only the viral DNA, poisoning our planet.

Instead we should select through a financial system owned by the brain-goverment, the good fruits of the tree of science that make us survive and evolve our brains and forbid those who kill us and trash our brains. So we would have massive investment in health care, housing, agriculture, education, humanist sciences, tourism, languages, environment, infrastructures, non-fiction information (documentaries free press), a credit handled by nationalized financial industries to private entrepreneurs in all those sectors, who would maximize the efficiency of individual entrepreneurship and the public rationale of non-profiteering bankers, just civil servants with the job of selecting the best purposes for credited companies. While those companies who create lethal machines for our body and brain will have null credit or would be legally banned, despite its higher profits (as weapons and digital trash software are the most profitable goods, in mathematical, economic equations: profits = Maximal price (weapons, the most perfect, top predator machines) – Minimal cost (digital software, that reproduces easily with no limit).

Finally labor will be the goal not productivity, which is exactly the opposite equation of labor. Since productivity=machines/labor, grows when we put more machines and fire more workers:

∆Productivity=∆Machine-capital/Labor

This equation, so simple and easy to understand that a school student can explain it is the mantra of our corporations and corrupted politicians, who tell us the anti-truth that rising productivity will create labor, when it does the opposite.

What those equations of productivity by firing workers and profits by creation of lethal machines tell us is several things:

– Machines compete with humans in labor and war fields and corporations are promoting those who destroy our lives, because their purpose is not human. It is to create a world made to the image and likeness of their offspring of machines, and so they need ideologies that justify that destruction, which are better served in a language we do NOT understand.

– The corruption of the political system is so absolute that they are pushing all the policies that destroy labor and life and citizen’s wealth to service corporations and bankers. So this leads to the 3rd measure (after a real control of the 2 languages of social power by elected governmetns) – a real democracy that ensures politicos will not be corrupted employees, puppets-clowns, house-negroes et al of those corporations, or else citizens can easily penalize them harshly. And again the model to achieve such perfect democracies is Nature and its perfect mammal organisms.

– Indeed the organism is also a perfect democracy, because those commanding neurons are JUDGED-VOTED a posteriori, with PAIN messages by a feed-back nervous power given to the cells. This means in a perfect democracy there would be also a VOTE at posteriori which will allow citizens to penalize those politicians AND BANKERS to the service of the people that ABSORB MORE ENERGY than they are allowed, or lie and do NOT try to accomplish their programs.

A real democracy will vote first in open lists NOT TO PARTIES BUT TO PEOPLE, because there is only a ‘natural social science’ whose purpose would be to BUILD A PERFECT WORLD, ACCORDING TO THE LAWS OF NATURE, designing a perfect social organism that caters to the need of all mankind. So the choice is not of two siamese parties to the service of corporations but of individuals, ethic and intelligent enough to make the best of the resources of this planet. But the main vote would be a posteriori with penalties of jail for crimes against life or fines for monetary gain (negative, pain messages), or re-election for a job well done, or a salary pension if the politician retires.

I then copyrighted a 1000 pages volume with all ‘the codes of the Universe’, in WGA, as i think I had truly r=evolved human sciences and set the basis for what Mr. hawking rightly said would be the science of the XXI century (complexity). It was January 1994, just before my 30th birthday. I was optimist, I believed what I had achieved could become the theoretical basis for a renewal of humanism and social sciences, which could start a new age of enlightenment for mankind. i was of course overall optimist as i did not want to acknowledge the obvious fact that the anti-quantum paradox would do to me what it had done to every previous human activist since the age of Plato…

And so we have now to deal in depth not with the ideal world and the laws of the perfect universe, but with the imperfect human species, and the ‘trial and error’ pedestrian reality, we have created with our dumb, weak, selfish actions, so below the ‘survival level’ the Universe expects for all its super organisms… The world of ‘animetals’ and ‘enzymen ‘…

Yet again to understand this new ‘biological categories’ – humans attached to metal instruments, weapons, money and machines that became the new ‘top predator species’ of this planet circa 3000 BC, with the beginning of the Age of bronze, and annihilated the first attempts to create a perfect world in the Fertile Crescent, in the age of the Goddesses and the priest-rulers with ethic thoughts, when wheat was money, life in community and social love the guidance of i+1 religions of Nature and Humanity – we need to explore the ‘laws of evolution in time’, according to the new discoveries of complexity sciences, its 3 time ages, and the parallelism between form in space and function in time.

So we shall now introduce the other great field of knowledge of complex sciences, the understanding of the two ‘forgotten dimensions’ of time, the past and the future and its causal relationships as systems grow in form in information between birth and extinction.

The laws of times.

The perfect world however does not exist. History is being instead ‘evolving’ mechanical information in a 3rd age of extinction of life super organisms. This is a fact. And we want to understand it with depth.

Biology: Evolution.

Back to biology, and its higher scale, the i+1 social scale, I realized species were also super organisms in which each individual was a cell. Since I could define an impersonal plan of evolution, where species also followed the 3 evolutionary ages or ‘dimensions of time’, from a young predator state, through a biological radiation that reproduces the species, into an informative ‘tall’ age of maximal perception. So life went from the flat worm to the tall man, and reptiles from the flat amphibia to the dinosaur and bird:

55-PLAN-EVOLUTION-1024x728

In the graph, a fundamental ‘question’ resolved by complex science is the unification of all the ‘scales’ of the Universe, according to the laws of ‘morphology’ in space and ‘causality’ of time, which defines a fundamental ‘ternary’ symmetry, between the ‘ages’ of time of a system, its ‘forms’ in space, and its ‘scales’ of social organization, from where we can deduce the ‘evolution’ in time and space of any ‘cellular’ i-1, individual or social-species, i+1 scale of organization:

The formalism of 3×3+1 Dimensional systems of scalar space-time, relates all those dimensions to the ‘synoptic’ concepts of energy, information and its reproductive combinations.

As all systems of Nature will be composed of 3 ‘morphological elements’, which correspond to the ‘3 topologies’ of 2-manifolds:

– E: lineal energy limbs/fields, maximal in the ‘1st young age of a system’

– I: cyclical, informative, gauging heads-particles, maximal in the 3rd old, informative age of the system.

– ExI: reproductive, combined waves-bodies, which balance both into a steady state, of maximal efficiency, proper of the adult, immortal age of a system.

Thus all systems of reality are made of 3 ‘physiological networks’, with those 3 elements, which in physical systems are E-fields/exi waves/i-particles, and in biological systems, are limbs/bodies/heads.

And in sociological systems are ‘energetic environment/reproductive middle, working classes and informative, linguistic, ‘upper classes’.

And so there is an ‘arrow of evolutionary time or life cycle’ which constantly increases the ‘information’ of a system through those 3 ages.

In the graph we can see that arrow of evolution in life species.

Thus the ‘3 dimensions of time’ (youth, adult and 3rd age), take place across 3 scales of complexity (cellular, individual and social scale), in symmetry with the 3 ‘dimensions of space’ (length, height and width), proper of the 3 ‘organic elements’ of any system according to a simple symmetry:

– Lineal length(Sx)=Maximal motion (youth)=i-1 scale (small, cellular) = ENERGY symmetry of fields/limbs/planar territories over the Earth.

– Height (Sy) = Maximal Perception (3rd age)=i+1 (social, bigger) = Information symmetry, proper of particles/heads/upper informative castes in control of the financial/legal languages of society.

– Width (Sz) = Maximal Balance (Adult Age) = i = Reproductive Age= Energy x Information, proper of waves/bodies/middle re=productive classes, which are the ‘most efficient’, steady state systems that must control the other 2 for the perfect design of any Universal system.

So I could create a synoptic analysis of all systems and its dimensions, as all physical and biological systems lived in space-time through its 3 ‘ages or states’, of Energy -> Exi-Reproduction -> Information, will have 3 components, and will follow the general laws of ‘physiology’ that organizes a perfect organism in which the body dominates the system (the wave action in physics, the middle class in a well-organized society, in which the ‘informative, neuronal castes of politicians and economists’ serve the people, and Nature is exploited for the resources of a welfare state where all humans receive energy and information toe survive,as all cells of a working organism does).

How accurate are those laws of Nature and the ‘ternary’ processes of evolution in time and organization in space of any system, can be observed if we analyze the specific ‘differentiation’ of the human being in gender, physiology, social classes, and ‘evolutionary species.

Anthropology: ternary differentiation

– And so this discovery applied to anthropology solved also the evolution of the human kind, also with 3 morphologies and ages – the visual, lineal neanderthal, the small, informative pygmy and its combinations, the 3 races of mankind:

 

56-gender-848x10231

In the graphs, one of the most fascinating results of Complexity analysis is the solution of the ‘Plan of Evolution’ based in the ‘limited’ topology of the Universe. Indeed, in a ”2-manifold”, pedantic expression that merely means a bidimensional surface, there are only 3 possible forms, which correspond to the morphologies of energy, information and its balanced combinations. So species evolve in those 3 eternal variations of the same theme, from lineal, energetic men to informative women and the intermediate sex, to the 3 human races, to the 3 ‘topologic varieties’ of evolution, to the 3 ages of life, function and form always rhyme. In the first picture we see the 3 ‘ages’ of evolution of most species. Below the differentiation of human species, into energetic, reproductive and informative ones.

Specifically the ‘evolution’ of the ape into the human being, shows the fundamental procedure of nature in the process of ‘differentiation’ of species along the 3 ‘fundamental’ possible avenues of a ternary organism: improvements in energy system, information systems and its balanced reproductive networks. Thus the original ape species can be differentiated into ‘energetic’ stronger animals (gorilla), informative ‘australopithecus’, and balanced, reproductive ‘bonobo chimpanzees’, our closest species, dedicated all day to ‘fuk’ (-;

Now contrary to belief, the ‘energetic’ species is the one normally extinguished, as the arrow of evolution primes the informative species, but FOR A SYSTEM TO REMAINS IMMORTAL, the desired strategy is neither evolve in information or energy, but maintain the steady state by reproducing constantly an equal system. This wisdom found in history only among Chinese Taoist masters (the closest culture to the laws of the yin-information yang-energy universe), which repeated its cycles of history dynasty after dynasty, and have become the most successful tribal species of cultural mankind, however is hardly attained in the Universe except in very wise systems (spiral galaxies, immortal cellular systems, taoist philosophers, etc.). Yet the knowledge of the physiological causes of death – the exhaustion of energy by selfish informative neurons/upper classes – is essential to control and maintain a system in the point of immortality. In any case, humans did evolve informatively and rejected the balanced and energetic states of evolution.

And so in the graph we can see how in III Horizons of increasing information, equivalent through the 3 ages of life (500 cc australopithecus, 1000 cc homo erectus, 1500 cc homo sapiens) mankind arrived to the final racial differentiation, in which the dominant informative verbal homo decoupled into:

– White, energetic, visual race/cultures (with higher mixture with Neanderthals in Europe).

– Reproductive balanced culture (black people, mixture of all other races after the ‘circumvolution’ of the old continents by the original verbal Homo – mithocondrial pigmy woman)

– Informative, mongoloid culture (mutated in the higher tibetan-altai steppe).

So surprisingly enough the so-called ‘superior white race’ to which this writer unfortunately belongs (-; should not have won the battle of history. If it does so is because it has allied itself despite their shortcoming in social organization with energetic metal-weapns, starting the evolution of ‘the other species’, which will extinguish us, the weapon or top predator machine whose function is to kill man.

But the original dominant species of the verbal black homo coming out of Africa and the Mongoloid Cro-magnon, coming out of Asia, the age of the verbal Goddesses and ‘Sumerian priests’, the ‘Taoist age’ of understanding of the yin yang forces of y-information and energy perceived by those earlier scientists of life, disappeared, and the schmidts and smiths, the metal masters’ of the west triumphed.

Why? This change that started with Genesis, with the tree of metal of technology, had an obvious cause: the discovery of ‘energetic weapons’ by white races that became ‘animetal cultures’ and imposed with the hypnotism of gold, the most perfect informative atom of the Universe and bronze and iron the most perfect energetic atom, its power to the rest of mankind, breaking the harmonic evolution of our social organism, history.

And so the anti-quantum paradox that confronted ‘selfish metal masters’ regressing to the i-scale of individual egos, and ‘priests of social love’ still trying to evolve mankind into an i+1 social organism started of Earnest. Our modern world is just the final phase of this ‘3rd age of human history’, where humans devolve for metal to evolve, as we became slaves of the instruments of metal that gave us power.

It will be the age of ‘military dictatorships’, based in the power of weapons, followed by the age of ‘financial dictatorships’ by the power of gold and then the age of ‘mechanisms’, when the machine became the idol of civilizations.

The animetal, 3rd age of history.

You live in a darwinian, tribal world in which there is not scientific analysis and design of mankind, and our political and economical systems. And the result is that as military men are not scientists of history, but the people who won that struggle with the use of Darwinian weapons, and many of their errors have been passed into the ‘national system’ -starting for the concept of nation that make us ‘different species’, not homo sapiens but homo britannicus, homo americanus etc – the ruling financial economists and bankers and corporations who control the economy are not experts of economics but the people who have imposed in that tribal fight, their power through the misuse and monopoly in the production of money, mass-media information and industrial wealth (weapons and machines).

But once all ideological and human speech is translated to biology, what we observe is the terraforming of the planet Earth from a world of life and humans into a world of machines, building a superorganism of increasingly automated corporations, where humans will soon be expendable as most life already is:3-ages-of-history

In the graph, we resume the 3 ages of history, if business as usual continues with the terraforming of the planet:

the Earth is evolving both in organic scale from individual human beings and machines into global systems and in species, from life beings into metal-systems, in which computers, metal-minds, connect and direct massive systems of automated machines. The robotic revolution will complete that transition from gaia into the metal-earth.

This is the ultimate meaning of the age of chips and information.

For that reason, it is imperative to understand technology in biological terms, abandoning the mathematical, abstract approach of classic economics, which cannot understand those cycles of evolution, neither studies the ‘real’ competence and collateral effects some lethal machines are having on mankind – from global warming, produced by the ‘detritus of those machines’, to the massive wave of unemployment that robotics is causing, to the risks poised by the evolution of Nuclear Weapons, into the threshold of ‘planetary bombs’ – quark bombs and black holes that can potentially destroy the planet.

In that regard, a Free Market is an ‘Economic ecosystem’, regulated by a language of information called money and ruled by company-mothers, whose aim is to re=produce and evolve machines, simple organisms of metal that imitate the functions of energy and information of the human being. As a result the Earth becomes terraformed, from a carbon-life ecosystem (Gaia), ruled by human organizations (Governments) and human languages (verbal laws) into an economic ecosystem (Free Market), dominated by company-mothers, money and machines, which enhance our energy and information but also compete and substitute man in war and labor fields.

Since what you are LIVING is the transition between both ages. we are mutating the planet, and making humans obsolete, substituting them by machines. We are not in control of the Earth – we are slaves of the metal-machines we make… And so history is becoming deterministic in the wrong path. As its directors, animetals, guided by greed and violence, the hypnotic values of gold and weapons, are just busy busy committing suicide and filling their brains of the most bizarre, deluded myths and fantasies about reality and the laws of god, the mind of the Universe, anyone might surely conceive.36-WAVE-HISTORY

animetals

In the graph, the ‘cultural’ opposition of history between ‘animetal’ cult(u res) that make of weapons, machines and money (energetic, organic and informative metal) the future of the Earth, and those who make of man and the complex laws of social evolution, the future of the planet. Unfortunately primitive animetal cultures have carried the day and will bring the extinction and substitution of our species by their go(l)ds soon unless a r=evolution of the human mind, according to the laws of the complex Universe takes place.

4- moneybest

In the graph, hand in hand, the evolution of ‘digital money’ and ‘weapons’ across the cycles of history, guided by the people-castes of animetals that have controlled the West since its invention.

Animetals unfortunately won most battles for the non-future of mankind, since the Bronze Age and the establishment of go(l)d religions, which created the first military and financial dictatorships that destroyed the Fertile crescent. Thus the previous pyramid has hardly evolved in the 3000 years that metal has been known to man, and the guidance of history passed from verbal priests to kings and bankers. So only studying the historic evolution of those systems of power, since the times of Phoenicia and Assur, the dominant financial and military dictatorships of the Bronze age, and specially the evolution of its newspeaks and ‘social experts’ can we fully grasp the dictatorship of capitalist democracies (the sophisticated modern way of maintaining the same military and financial elites on top of us.)

Only the sophistication of the ‘triad’ of memes that sustains capitalism: ‘tribal power’, ‘mechanic worship’ and ‘financial monopoly’ has changed. At the beginning it was resumed in the alliance between aristocratic kings with monopoly on the use of weapons and ‘people-castes’ from Levante which spread throughout the west and monopolized the issue of go(l)d. Thus banker-priests and kings-aristocracies exploited together a mass of poor peasants. And it was all too obvious, hence mankind developed hate-speeches against the people-castes of aristocrats and bankers, their cultures and religions, which exploded in full during the French R=evolution, unfortunately killed by those military and financial groups they criticized, externally (Prussian-Russian-British coalition) and internally (Napoleon and the ‘king-bankers’).

Thus after the French r=evolution, because many Europeans have been freed from Abrahamic Religions of the $elected and Germanic tribal nationalistic cults, more complex ‘newspeaks’ developed: the newspeaks of controlled vote (democratic newspeaks), the newspeaks of ‘industrial wealth’ (machines as symbol of pogress), the newspeaks of ‘sovereign nations’ (so armies increased massively in numbers since now the state didn’t even had to pay the soldier, he was defending ‘for’ free’ his ‘freedoms’), and so on… It however did not fully work, and so a century latter, after the Russian R=evolution and the Nazi Holocaust, more massive newspeaks developed in full thanks to the audiovisual media. This is the modern world we live in of political and economic correctness, when ‘history’ is re-written and ‘social scientists’ are vaporized if they attempt as this blog with null public attempts to develop a full honest humanist view of those sciences. The sophistication of political and economical correctness,of ‘bull$hit’, the main mode of expression today, though would be not enough if at the same time visual machines were not degrading the logic, causal, memorial capacity of humans to process information.

Thus as always there is a ‘parallel’ synergy between machines that atrophy and degrade us – in this age mental visual machines that degrade our minds – and the ideologies that establish our conformity with the system. It is the neo-paleolithic age of ‘visual children’ with huge egos, null social activity, ‘tele minds’ built on TV cues and tele-directed at distance by simultaneous flows of parallel information, very much as all the cells of a body move in sychronicity under the same branched nervous message.

The result is the present mythic, abstract, ideological, subjective, ‘selfish’ incapacity of man to observe reality as it is from an external , non-anthropomorphic, rational point of view, away from their short-sighted ego.

What has dissapeared as the super organism of mankind dies is a view of the whole species.

Yet that view is essential to survival and real to the Universe. It is what we call the i+1 social scale in the formalism of Complex Sciences, which dominates all efficient systems over the i-ndividual, cellular scales.

It isin human societies the’science’ of ethics, which studies precisely the laws of that social ‘higher plane of existence’ – the super organism of mankind and its main force, social love – the sharing of energy and information among all the members of the species – and how those laws are corrupted by the ‘hidden values’ of selfish memes of metal – the violence instilled by weapons, the greed caused by hypnotic gold, the laziness and atrophy, provoked by the organic machines that substitute us, weakened us, make us selfish, and ‘divide and win’ over the species now ‘tribal’, self-centred and passive.

Indeed, ethics has failed, and as it happens in a super organism when it dies, and the nervous, informative ‘legal-ethic’ control disappears, today humans have yielded all sense of community to the ‘cellular’ i-ndividual search for pleasure and power. In brief Humans have preferred power, happiness, ego-trips and subjective fantasies to a serious scientific, objective analysis of the reality of this planet and its species, according to the social, complex laws of nature..

And this is a tragic fact, because the Universe runs on scientific, objective analysis. And so paradoxically humans, guided by the ‘myths’ of ideologies, such as capitalism, mechanism, nationalism (which essentially are ideologies that defend the power of money, machines and weapons over humans) live in a ‘programmed’ runaway planet in motion, whose fundamental goal is to evolve those machines to a point in which human ‘animetals’ do indeed become obsolete to ‘Intelligent robotic machines’, and become displaced from the top position they still hold in this planet.

It is thus obvious that our societies are not ‘free economies’ but economic dictatorships of a few ‘financial corporations’ overwhelmingly ‘owned’ by biblical believers, which puts ‘religion’ and the ‘beliefs’ of the $elected, into the core of the economic world. Thus, even if it is ‘censored’ and forbidden by the subtle modes of newspeaks of the modern world (political and economical correctness), it is impossible to understand the present world without a historic analysis of the ways in which the ‘racist’, go(l)d fetishes and memes of the bible have influenced the thought of classic economics and our elite of bankers.

Only the European and Chinese, ‘traditional’ legalist schools of rational non-religious social r=evolutionary thought have attempted after II world war to create economic models based in a scientific control of the legal and financial languages of human societies with clearly superior results: Europe created the closest society to a human paradise in the 70s, prior to the ‘loss’ of financial freedom to private banks and the ECB (a private bank de facto which only issues money for other banks and has imposed a dictatorship of banking institutions over the policies of governments similar to the control wall street exercises over the parties and laws of America), while China, perhaps the only country left, of certain importance, where financial power does not control absolutely the political system,has the highest growth per capita, both of GDP and Human Development of the world, for a steady 30 years. What proves obviously that ‘democratic, economic systems’ would work and are possible.

However neither of them is a ‘political democracy’. Since for a political system to be a democracy politicians not only must be elected to their positions in ‘open lists’ but they must be judged at the end of their tenure by the people, according to the achievement of their electoral promises. Indeed, the fundamental mechanism of democracy is the judgment of politicians, as it happened in the only democracy, which ever existed in Greece, where after tenure politicians were judged by vote and could be exiled, imprisoned even put to death if they stole or committed crimes against the state. As in the organism, where the body judge with pain messages a posteriori the actions of its neuronal, informative castes a real democracy would have an overgrown judiciary systems with popular juries, ABOVE the legislative and executive system, and all public servants would be judged a posteriori, which ensured their proper use of the ‘financial and legal’ languages they would control for the benefit of their citizens.

In Greece, the least important element was the elections, often just a lottery in which all citizens participated by law. It was as in efficient organisms of nature, the judgement vote what mattered. Further on, political parties were ignored, as they obviously are just ideological systems, which protect politicians. In reality social sciences are ‘sciences’, which means they ARE single party sciences – as there is a social, organic science of politics and economics, based in the laws of nature that construct efficient social organisms. So parties should be abolished, politicians and economists should be experts in the laws of complexity, social systems and networks, outlined in this blog, imitating nature’s most perfect organisms, and their actions should lead to an efficient production and distribution of the goods and equalitarian laws that ensure the maximal happiness and survival of human societies.

In our societies however, there is neither political freedom – since politicians are immune to the law, and do not receive judgment, so they must merely ‘cheat’ the voter and then sell their laws to the wealthiest corporations, as they are also puppets with no power, no capacity to reproduce money – nor there is efficiency, since politicians are NOT experts in physiology of social systems, theory of information, complexity,systems sciences, economics (the real science NOT the ideologies of capitalism), etc. etc. they just have ‘amateurish opinions’ and ego-trips, and personal agendas of wealth and power.

Yet historic cycles are never deterministic. Since a r=evolution can change the paradigm of history, in the same manner a simple screen can stop a ray of light that has been performing its waves cycles from eons, coming from some remote star. A true science of history and economics will stop the accelerated process of evolution of those memes of metal, to redirect history towards the evolution of human systems, both in the individual and social memetic scales, disregarding all racial myths and religious exceptionalisms, copying the physiological laws of efficient, democratic, survival organisms, whose informative, energetic and reproductive networks feed and inform all the cells of the body.

Yet at present, social sciences are confused with ideologies of metal-power, whose ‘outcome’ is the constant evolution of those memes of metal, while the ‘human evolution’ is halted by primitive ideologies of violence and greed – the subconscious engine of ‘metal-history’.

The conclusion is obvious, by far, humans have been unable to create true social sciences and manage their collective existence in a rational manner.

But how such system can be hold and what is more surprising, openly accepted and defended by most humans? The answer of course, is that ‘absolute power corrupts absolutely’. And so at this stage, there is not a politician who dares to criticize the elite; most citizens totally ignored the nature of capitalism; and the elite has enough surplus money to corrupt, and ‘engage’ as Mr. Rothschild explain, anyone who understands it except very few honest, ethic, intelligent human beings. And if anyone succeeds in defying the system, even in a small territory, ‘war’ is always handy, to depose the ‘rebel’.

Indeed, such systems, while individually give some ‘slack’ to the person, on private matters, must control absolutely the i+1 social collective behaviour of populations. So they also invest heavily in weapons to control their population (police state), make wars (as they are the most profitable endeavours of capitalism, where more expensive machines are produced and sold to the state, and renewed in arsenals), and degrade the mind of their population so they ignore all about economics, money, how it is issued and the real meaning of democracy.

So while we might argue a capitalist dictatorship is below the individual control proper of military dictatorships, in personal freedoms, whatever name they have (communist-like; fascist-like, theocratic-like or aristocratic-like ‘kingdoms’), capitalist dictatorships are well above any military dictatorship in economic exploitation of their people. We might say that a military dictatorship is a control-freak society but it is often also a strict paternal society where all the members of society are considered part of the organism and might receive some ‘charity goods’. A capitalist society, though does not admit the people the corporation does not need either as workers=reproducers of machines and consumers=testers of machines. So those people are abandoned to the chaos, outside society. So they are free but will likely die of hunger and poverty.

Now, because in the age of robotics, automated corporations no longer need human workers, and robots will become soon the biggest consumers of other machines needed to construct them, or handled by their software, HUMANS NO LONGER WILL HAVE ANY ECONOMIC ROLE AS CONSUMERS AND RE=PRODUCERS OF MACHINES. And this is making around a billion human beings thoroughly obsolete, with no work or no consumption rights. So the society is now throwing them into chaos, but fully aware that they are a surplus and might rebel, the fundamental question of the Age of the Singularity is ‘how to exterminate the surplus of life-beings, created by the robotic blue collar and pc white collar revolution’.

This will be the fundamental problem to solve by ‘capitalist dictatorships’ – the elimination of the surplus of life. And since in the past this has been done with wars (so war solved the surplus of the 29 crisis), and other fascist policies, it was obvious to this writer 20 years ago that the world will not only enter an economic crash similar to the 29 crash provoked by the automation of assembly lines, but a ‘fascist’ age to increase the process of elimination of human beings, which will constantly improve its ‘techniques’ as the century advances under the ‘censored’ management of the ‘biblical elite’ that consider us non $elected ‘animal life’, though this of course is never said in public.

Thus any financial, corporative, capitalist dictatorship will continue the process of terraforming of the planet, from the anthropocene – the age of man – to the mechanocene – the age of machines – which is becoming rather automatic.

Capitalism and nationalism are not sciences of history and economics but ideologies of ‘viral power’.

Thus, it is only when we understand the ‘true science of economics and history’ , when we can reflect about the ‘reasons’ and ‘nature’ of the present ideologies of history and economics that rule us, nationalism and capitalism. Since now it becomes obvious that neither of them follows the ‘minimal, stringent conditions’ for a humanist science, able to ‘predict the future’ according to the causal dimensions of time, and its evolutionary ages, nor it caters to mankind, with its praxis.

What are then those two ‘dismal sciences’, or rather ideologies? A wrong process of evolution by trial and error, which has imposed to mankind an i+1 social structure that parasites her.

‘The Economist’, the magazine of ‘classic economics’ made a test of the ‘scientific nature’ of economics, affirming that it should be able to predict the future as sciences did, testing taxi drivers, garbage collectors, ministers of economy and neo-classic scholars on future indicators of growth and unemployment. Result: taxi drivers came first close to garbage collectors.

Why? Because they used just common sense about the economic crisis they were suffering; while professors of economics and financial ministers used the ‘damned lies and statistics’ of this ‘dismal science’ that caters to the idol-ogies of power of the financial elite that made of classic economics a ‘dogma’ , regarding how to ‘manage’ the ‘economic, re=productive networks’ of mankind, dedicated to produce the goods humans need to survive.

In that regard, ‘capitalism’ and ‘nationalism’, the 2 praxis that control and direct the economic ecosystem of humans and machines, with the language of money; and the evolution of history with weapons and laws, are NOT the sciences of economics and history, but the ideologies of power, of the human elites that control them.

How this is done, through Hollywood, Wall Street and bought politicos, all in the ‘property’ of the same people is accessory to the mimetic structure of a perfect ‘physiology of network control’

is in great measure a consequence of the use of scholar and ego-centered ‘newspeaks’; which soothe and cheat the people into believing the system work for them. So the scholar and mass-media system is ‘expert’ in the use of a controlled ‘fiction language, made of placebo freedoms’, which creates a false, virtual reality of self-empowerment and hides the chains of our societies.

‘evilwood’ with its anti-live, ‘evil’ messages (genetic inversion of morphology in this word), Wall Steet manufacturing money and Politicos bought for a price, are the equivalent of a neuronal brain which controls the rate of the heartl and production of red cells, the nervous messages of the body and the entry to all external information throughout the senses. Yet there is no ‘organism’ where that control is so overwhelming that works properly. So human societies in a way are ‘too blind’ and so often their bodies collapse and their cultural minds become ‘crazy’.

So in the development of a true science of history and economics we have to confront two facts:

– The theoretical realm, which allows to create a true science of history and economics, following the organic, biological laws of complex systems, and how they organize herds of self-similar beings (in this case human beings) through ‘blood=reproductive=economic and nervous-informative=political networks’.

We have on purpose added a biological comparison of those networks with the equivalent ‘biological ones’. Since in fact, the laws that regulate any kind of social networks regardless of scale are the same. So we can observe ‘efficient’, functional biological organisms, evolved by nature, and use its laws as a template to build a theoretical perfect world in which as it happens in biological organisms, all cellular citizens obtain enough energy and information to survive.

This would be a proper science of history and economics, which completes the natural evolution of human beings into a higher ‘social scale’ as it happens in nature with all systems, from particles that evolve into molecules that evolve into cells and multicellular organisms, planets, solar systems and galaxies.

Social evolution is thus natural to the universe and its laws should apply to design the perfect social organism of mankind with efficient, democratic governments that control its nervous, informative, legal systems and economic, financial ones for the benefit of all those cells.

But humans have been a very short time period in this planet. So evolution, which is a process of trial and error that constantly creates ‘wrong’, dumb organisms that do not make the cut of survival in the Universe, have not in the case of human social evolution created very efficient, well-designed social systems.

Instead it has created smaller ‘units’ than the species, tribal nations, which confront each other with weapons and annihilate each other periodically in war cycles, as ‘a few’ warrior people-castes oppress the rest of the species with the use of ‘energetic metal’, weapons that destroy the tissue of societies. This people which hold power in many nations, and control others hand in hand with politicians, are NOT scientists of history, but a ‘parasitic’ caste similar to the sickness of a living organism, which ally themselves with an external ‘germ’, to the body of History, ‘energetic metal weapons’, infecting and destroying mankind.

Further on, another group or people-caste, bankers, have developed an ideology of religious, biblical origin, according to which, they must monopolize the issue of the ‘oxygen’ of the blood-reproductive-economic system, money, absorbing it all as ‘experts’ by the ‘grace of Go(l)d’, and control societies with it. This antidemocratic people-caste, thus establish contra-natura, the laws of financial capitalism. Since in all organisms oxygen is delivered for free with a Universal salary to all cells, which demand to the organs of the body the natural proteins and enzymes and hormones they need to survive.

Human systems thus have two parasitic groups, warriors with weapon ‘germs’ , mostly of germ-anic tribal origin in the west, and parasitic cancerous bankers, who absorb all the oxygen of the system, mostly biblical origin in the west, which have created an aberrant super organism of history and economics, similar to a leukaemia organism, in which the viral germs, reproduce more viruses – in the case of such aberrant historic capitalist systems, more machines and weapons; while the organism and its ‘colonized’ cells, no longer reproduce the natural, life-welfare goods they need to survive.

So cells suffer anemia, cancer, scarcity and finally the organism dies as viruses multiply. So happens to this planet where 1 billion human cells suffer poverty but all machines and weapons have enough energy and information to survive, and al resources are deviated to evolve and reproduce them, for the ‘elites’ of society, which we shall call biologically animetal. Since they are ‘animals’ whose function, is to catalyze the evolution of metal.

All this historic development, which ended the Fertile Crescent paradise and substituted it by a world of bankers and warriors on top of societies, reached its zenith with the discovery of the machine, and the beginning of the Industrial R=evolution, the final age of history, in which now ‘animetal castes’, became organized in ‘company-mothers’ of machines and weapons, who established control over human governments, and converted mankind at large into ‘reproducers=workers’ and consumers=vitalizers of machines.

It is the present world in which humans dedicate all its time to reproduce, evolve and select by consumption machines, organisms of metal that substitute, atrophy and compete with humans in labor and war fields.

The result is biological: corporations and its offsprings of machines – which are NOT of human ‘per se’ – are terraforming the Earth into an eco(Nomic) system made to its image and likeness, in which life becomes extinct.

AND WHAT CLASSIC ECONOMICS DOES, is without the slightest philosophical or humanist argument about that process and its biological meaning, to PUSH the process to its final goal – the substitution of all humans by robotic machines, guided by primitive nationalist and religious go(l)d ideologies that make them ‘believe’ this is Ok, this process is natural, this is ‘God’s mandate’; since humans are of no importance, only the elite, the 1%, the ‘$elected’ are Ok, and as long as things go well for them, protected and separated from mankind by its Anonymity and control of corporations and financial issue of money, all will be Ok.

Thus neither economists, or their company-mothersof machines define humanist goals for economics, it does not understand the biological laws of evolution that guide the development of machines and it does not study the relationships of symbiosis and competition between both species, but affirms with ‘anthropomorphic zeal’, almost religiously the ‘positive nature’ of money and machines.

We are thus within the realm of economics in a pre-scientific age similar to the astrological phase of cosmology when man was considered the centre of the Earth and stars turned mysteriously around ‘it’. Only when Kepler (left side of the graph) found its regular cycles as we have shown for economics, we could talk of a scienficic, predictive age. So happened to medicine when the ‘negative effects of ‘i-1 germs’ were used to explain the illness of organisms. Before we had ‘quacks’ that didn’t cure us; as evidently happens with economists that do not cure the illness of the super organism of history of which we are all citizens-cells.

But would you put your health and life in the hands of quacks that pass as doctors? So that is what mankind is doing.

The conclusion is obvious: economists and bankers are NOT the scientists of economics, as the military and the politicos are NOT the scientists of history but the people who use money, weapons and machines to impose their power. And the people who cater to them since Tertulianus put it neatly” ‘you will defend me with the sword and I will defend you with the word’.

Which leads to the D) point of the scientific method that we will treat extensively at the end of this page: the null capacity of Classic Economics to ‘design intelligently’ a world made to our image and likeness, as human beings – NOT to the image and likeness of the machines that give profits to corporations.

The reader must understand the extraordinary advance that Complex Sciences and the understanding of the scalar laws of the Universe represent. As we could establish homologies between systems in different scales. Men were acting as enzymes of machines, catalyzing their evolution and at the same time loosing their control to them. Machines were ‘organs’ made at a bigger scale because their atoms were bigger than those of men. Thus their factories were similar to those cellular factories that reproduced enzymes but at a much larger scale and so instead of microscopic RNAs there were humans making them. The Earth was mutating from a ‘soft’, watery, larva like ‘species’ the human being, into a hard, more efficient, metallic species ‘the robot’ (as a larva molt s into a hard insect).

This odd homology illustrates the case: when an insect mutates from larva to hard butterfly, ‘enzymes’ multiply in the larva and construct the hard insect taking advantage of the superior functions of its new parts. Then it produces its ‘internet brain’ and finally builds a ‘hard enzyme’, the equivalent to a robot, which once is self-reproductive, kills all the larva enzymes (the humans) and the larva dies and the hard insect is born. It was a microscopic description of the ‘transformation’ the planet was suffering from the ‘antrhopocene’ to the ‘mechanocene’, from a world of life into a world of robots, foreseen in films like Terminator, given the fact that ‘economists’ were just pawns of the process, ‘enzyme’ who were happily creating ‘Matrix’, the brain of the future Earth, as today Google keeps controlling internet information and buying out all kind of robotic and military corporations…

All those relationships between the laws I was discovering in complex sciences, were both a warning, a predictive system for the future, and a model which could extract laws to prevent and improve the planet for the benefit of man.

It was no doubt, also that the i+1 scale of social evolution of mankind into a global humanist super organism was ‘real’, that ‘socialism’ was the only natural science of history and ‘sociology’ its true form. That the individual scale in the Universe mattered far less than the social scale to survive – reason why for example, China, the most efficient social, collective organism was by far the most efficient survival culture of mankind, while in the West its most selfish i-centered subjective civilizations with ‘concepts of superiority’ of race or religion had by far being the less successful survival species. Since we were ‘all members’ of the same human species. Suddenly the ‘why’ of historic, social, economical and biological process came together.

Since it was obvious also that in engineering humans have also developed in 3 ages, the ‘age of energy machines’ (Steam age of england), the age of ‘engines’ (German age) and the age of ‘metal-minds’ or age of information (American age), followed by the organic creation with the 3 components of the robotic ‘organism’, the age we live now.

The alternative: the construction of the perfect world

Such was a necessary condition for the perfect world. And that was what history had attempted, creating every bigger social scales.

Ultimately what the perfect world is the culmination of human evolution along the ‘arrow of scalar, social evolution, from the time of smaller bands to the time of a global civilization. In the next graph we see how those scales of fractal evolution of all systems of the Universe applied to mankind show this naturla tendency, which a Wor(l)d Union would top over the final ‘human, verbal evolution’ of ethic religious, love/life based cultures:

1166In the graphs of the human SCALAR dimensions, we observe that the states of self-organization of machines and humans create two divergent, parallel universes, and the economic ecosystem today pray on the human social system. This means we must reverse that trend, maximizing the ‘social constitution’ of a health superorganism of mankind.

dtp_1664099_USER_CONTENT_2_html_m79a3b338

To that aim we can imagine worlds that will exist in fact in self-similar forms in all those planets that didn’t create military industrial complex and controlled ethically the economic and social systems of human kind.

The difference between both organisms – the perfect world in which ethonomics and the values of the world dominate money, and the animetal world we live in, dedicated to parasite mankind with weapons and debt-money and make us toil for a rival species is obvious:

THEY ARE DIFFERENT SUPER-ORGANISMS, AND ONLY ONE CATER TO THE NEEDS OF OUR SPECIES.

Thus this was my next task in the adventure of knowledge, and evolution of complex science – to create a serious science of economics and history by describing the human super-organism.

Now, that I had translated the general laws of an ideal super organism, to the super organism of history it was only left to design theoretically such perfect super organism.

This was actually much simpler than expected.

For one thing, the Human super organism was in its first stages of evolution and thus was very simple, which is positive, but as such very inefficient and not exactly in its path of survival as a species, due to the faulty simplistic design, I am about to narrate.

The solutions to human extinction: The creation of the rainbow planet.

The Universe is a fractal super organism of 10 dimensions (3 of space, 3 of time, past, present and future, and 3 scales of social complexity, the cellular, individual and social scale). Departing from the formal model constructed with those 10 dimensions we can obtain:

– Ideal Worlds-superorganisms in which the perfect 10 Dimensional design is obtained.

– Real World-Superorganisms, who suffer as ours a ‘parasitic’ and ‘darwinian’ disease, for whom ‘solutions’ to cure the super organism can be designed.

The perfect world, the rainbow Earth is a planet made to the image and likeness of mankind and its 7 main cultural super-organisms.

The integration of those 7 cultural civilizations both at the i-1, national scale and the i+1 global scale, would design a perfect ‘unit’ for the different varieties of human cultures to flourish in a world designed to maximize human life and information.

How to design those civilizations and the global super organism would be a simple task if humans were ‘all for it’, as the laws of super organisms offer not difficulty. Simple immediate measures: the nationalization of all financial, ‘blood’ networks, the creation of a global ‘yes’ money salary to all humans to create a demand economy that would multiply human goods, the legal prohibition of the robotic industry that conflicts with humans in labor and war fields, the inversion of ‘powers’ in democracies between the judicial system above the political system, with politicians subject to ‘pain messages’ a posteriori in case to fail their ‘contract promises’. And so on. It is very easy to create such a perfect ideal world in paper and it is perhaps the most astonishing fact of ‘social sciences’ to the service of ‘animetal’ (military & financial) power, that social sciences have never reached a degree of scientific analysis to make such program for a perfect world explicit in the past, at least when humans had a big chance to implement it.

Today the perfect world is – i am conscious – an utopia, as humans have become slaves of machines and their brains controlled by ‘the medium’ and its ‘technological messages’. Yet the perfect world must exit in a sizeable number of planets… of the fractal Universe, where the 10 D super organism of history has been properly created and designed.

As such the perfect world is a planet in which all men are equal despite its cultural differences, and dedicate their lives to enhance their existence as human, socio-biological beings, in its 3 spheres of existence, the biological, survival sphere, for which ethonomic sciences provide enough welfare goods to survive, the human, individual sphere, for which the proper information allows to develop a full human being, and the social sphere, in which an efficient government, create the conditions to prosper.

Such perfect worlds exist in infinite planets that have not destroyed themselves under the parasitic rule of ‘animetal cultures’ of warriors and debt-bankers.

As such perfect worlds have evolved socially through the scales of eusocial evolution of mankind into an immortal super-organism of history: an efficient world designed with the law of superorganisms, imitating nature, with no parasite cancerous cultural organs (bankers, warriors and animetal people-castes) on top of the organism, sucking its energy in wars and labor fields for the service of machines and its information with debt-money.

The perfect world is a planet where humans thrive, either because men are moral enough to control the negative energy/information of selfish memes of metal and control its evolution, or because there is simply no metal, no weapons, no technology in such planets.

In both cases the perfect world evolves departing from the natural eusocial collective human minds of a non-technological world, the 7 cultures of mankind, whose origin in the evolution of subconscious collective gods of mankind is explained elsewhere in this text.

In the graph we see the perfect world and its 7 cultures. What we call the rainbow planet.

The ‘rainbow’ planet is formed by the 7 main cultures of the world, and since it is a cultural association, requires not of army borders, only internal police in each ‘department’ of administration or ‘region’ of the culture. Terminology and newspeak of course in the rainbow planet is positive to peace and comprehension between groups of mankind.

The rainbow planet requires obviously an economic equality between all the members of society to a minimal degree of ‘satisfaction’ of the pyramid of Maslow or Paretto curve of utility which means a global financial UNO based currency which emits a global fiat money, salary of legal tender in all nations of the Rainbow planet, the Human Empire of other utopias of my book in perfect super-organisms of mankind.

In this section of the web we shall study and design with the tools of system sciences under our template definition of science such perfect rainbow planet.

The 3rd age of childish, old mankind.

“Questa essere opera inutile” (I know many will call this a useless work.) Da Vinci. “The Notebooks”

And yet, paraphrasing Mr. Leonardo’s frustration with his ‘too advanced for the age’ work, which defied the dominant ideologies of the age and brought upon him the prosecution of the inquisition of that time, I am aware that most members of the human kind have found and will find all this effort ‘useless’.

Why?

In that regard, the anti-quantum paradox rises a fundamental question of ethics on the human nature: Determinism. Are we humans, on the view, of its astounding backwardness on social sciences and the management of the planet, and its politic, economic and ecological (information-reproduction-energy) networks, PROGRAMMED to self-destroy. Do we have free will? Or are the ‘memes of metal’ and the values they impose upon men (monetary greed, weapon’s violence and machines’ atrophy of human organs) the dominant factor which imposes ‘subconsciously’ the negative actions of man upon other men?

Here we insert fully bio-history and ethics into science. Ethics indeed is the i+1 informative messages of the natural language of man, wor(l)ds that try to convey the laws of social organization of ‘cellular systems’ that share energy and information to act together as a common whole. But the effect of memes of metal on people has always been to ‘erase’ ethics, and then, ‘anti-prophets’ have come to ‘justify’ the subconscious behaviour caused by those selfish memes of metal with ‘bizarre’ idol- ogies that today pass as truth or science. Are therefore all men corruptible, all men ‘believers’ with no reason. Aristotle said ‘most men are slaves they believe they don’t reason’. Are therefore the citizens-cells of mankind, its informative, ‘neuronal cells’ or upper class elites in control of money weapons and laws, and the ‘sheeple’, the middle class of workers, who believe their information, ‘just’ as the cells of any other super-organism, destined to die?

What we witness today at large, is precisely the natural process of decay, corruption and death and substitution of mankind by another species, those selfish memes of metal – which are the germs of the super organism of history that kill our minds and bodies – and its greedy, violent, monetary and military values.

Theresult is a regression to the past, primitive ages of our history (as old men do, remembering its past), and the return of the most primitive ideologies of mankind (abrahamic religious revival, violent, neo-paleolithic selfishness). We can thus explain fully the devolution of mankind at brain and body level produced today by their atrophy and substitution by machines, the regression of our culture in the 3rd ‘old’ age to infantile negative behaviours and bizarre, primitive fetishe idol -ogies and religions. All those processes are parallel to the process of death of a body and the processes of disconnection (ethic death) of its cells, no longer believing in the nervous, simultaneous democratic messages that organize them. The chaos of our world is similar to the chaos of an organism.

The content and sections of this blog

What this blog, does, is study that transition between the anthropocene and the mechanocene, departing from the laws of complexity and systems sciences, which fusion the laws of biology and physics, and study how physical and biological systems organize themselves across those i±1 scales and networks – hence are ideally suited to study the relationships in those scales between humans and ‘metal-memes’ (informative metal-money, energetic metal-weapons and organic machines that transform back and forth energy into information).

It does have therefore at least 5 fundamental themes, outlined in this central post, studied with more depth in the ‘general title’ of the web above, and in great detail in the different sections on the sides, all of which read as ‘connected sentences’ that develop the main themes of each sub-discipline:

– First we outline the laws of complex sciences and systems, which this author pioneered in the 90s, with the discovery of the mathematical and formal laws that organize those social scales in all the systems of the Universe. They explain the similarities between physical and biological systems that allow the interaction of men and machines at individual and social level. (Upper Left side of the web)

– Then we apply those laws to describe both the industrial r=evolution of machines, and its social organizations (corporations) and digital languages (money). Thus we refound Economics from an objective, non-ideological perspective, different from ‘capitalism’ (the ideology in favour of money and machines without any consideration to the collateral effects they cause), or from socialism (the ideology that considers the abstract ideas of Mr. Marx, a ‘religion of true economics’). Since neither of both ‘perspectives’ is more than a partial analysis of the eco(nomic)system, the economic ecosystem, nor it passes the stringent minimums of a true scientific discipline. (Right side of the web)

– And we study the human super-organisms of history (cultures, religions, civilizations and nations), which use a different language, verbal thought, to organize human systems through networks of energy (environment), re=production (economy) and information (politics). Since both sciences have not truly evolved beyond a few ‘pioneers’ (Khaldun, Vico, Toynbee, Spengler), a proper organic model of human societies, which merely are the i+1 social scale of human organization guided by the same systemic laws of all social systems. (Middle Left side of the web)

– Thus we also use those laws to design ideal, perfect social human systems (the perfect world) that could organize mankind globally into a just, efficient society in which humans remain on top, and control for their benefit machines and corporations. (Lower left side of the web).

Those 3 ‘levels’ of research are the most innovative of this web, as usually systemic scientists, who work for Corporative industries, have tried to apply the laws of complexity to a better organization of corporations, not of human societies, and have not developed a critical view of machines and corporations, as they ‘follow the flow’ of history in favour of the mechanocene.

How this collective blindness of humanity to its destiny is possible? To clarify why we humans are so ignorant of the process that create the future, and the cycles of history and evolution of machines, money, weapons and the cycles of wars and holocausts they cause, we require two more sections:

– A description of those cycles of history – the ‘hidden facts’ that crystal clear show the process of evolution of metal and its collateral effects over life – as those cycles accelerate the complexity of machines in two ages – the age of 800 year cycles of weapons and money evolution (Bronze, chariots, iron, coins, spurs-cavalry and gunpowder ages) always ending in a global age of war, when the reproduction and evolution of those weapons reaches a zenith; and the 80 years cycles of evolution of machines & weapons, which also have ended in global wars, in the modern era (age of trains, cars=tanks and computers=robotic weapons).

– A criticism from the perspective of humanity (whose goal is to thrive, survive and acquire the maximal energy and information, by managing the planet to our advantage) of all those idol- ogies, which pass as science today, and fundamentalist, corrupted religions, which form together an ‘iron jail’ (Webber), an straight-jacket of the human mind, that blind us to the process of increasing obsolescence of the human-kind we live in.

This most polemic part of the web, and likely cause of its censorship attacks directly the ‘beliefs’ of every human being. Since it is a fact that most of the ideas, cultures, religions and opinions of people are ‘from another planet, out of the blue’, that is HAVE NOTHING to do with reality, with the biological laws of nature, with the process taking place in this planet. In brief, as mankind has become an ‘animetal’, an enzyman that catalyzes the evolution of those machines, it has filled his collective subconscious mind with absolute idiocies, from nationalism (the belief the species is divided in Homo Americanus, Homo Germanicus, Homo Judaicus and so on), to capitalism (the belief that ‘money is the language’ of god who must be obeyed without any understanding of its values and properties)… not to speak of Abrahamic religions (the belief that a couple of goat-keepers of the bronze age hold the meaning of the Universe), to political and economical correctness (the belief we must NOT rationally argue and discuss the values and lethal effects of the aforementioned ideologies, because it is not ‘polite’ )-:

This criticism of idol-ogies and present actions of our leaders and admired cultures of the day, which are fast guiding the human kind towards its demise, is mostly done in the right bottom part of this web. And as i said usually provokes the disgust of the ‘polite’, mindless ‘slave’ of those idol- ogies, the ‘normal man of the day’. As the definition of the quantum paradox in terms of complex equations is this:

Maximal technological evolution = Minimal cultural, humanist evolution

In other words, in the same manner the most advanced culture of the previous cycle of machines was Germany, during the Nazi age, when ‘engines’ of metal reached its maximal efficiency in tanks and bombers, provoking under the Anti-quantum paradox, given the minimal humanist evolution of the Germans (with the most primitive, egative, agglutinative wor(l) ds of Europe among other ‘human traits’), today the most advanced technological nations of the world, US and Israel, are the most primitive humanist cultures of the west, where 90% of the people believe the aforementioned goat-keeper brothers hold the meaning of the universe, Go(l)d is the invisible hand of the goat-keeper deity, men must carry weapons to kill his brother, and those who do not belong to their ‘$elected race’, are called ‘goyyim’, ‘animals’, etc. etc.

And yet they are proud believers which seem to have the brain broken into a rational, scientific module for natural sciences, and an imprinted, bizarre, selfish, racist tribalism on the social sciences’ side.

And so the only open question left to answer in the blog, which history will as time passes by is: can we resurrect the body of mankind, or are we social scientists just under the anti-quantum paradox, observers who cannot modify the observable, bizarre ideological brain of our capitalist, nationalist, mechanist metal-masters who refuse to ‘evolve’ mentally?

As I get old, fully aware of the depth and importance of the discoveries i have made in complexity, systems sciences, and its social sciences applications, my own subjective paradox is this: the more I know about mankind, the less likely I see its resurrection objectively, but subjectively I will never recognize a r=evolution is impossible. And i know this blog holds the proper information to make it possible, if humans had enough intelligence, and force (ethics) to fully have a will to survive, instead of hiding their heads like ostriches do, preying to some putrid corpse of the bronze or iron or cavalry age to solve ‘his problem’. While hordes of believers in all the wrong memes keep busy-busy, like lemmings do, its race to the cliff. The whole process is somehow fascinating for its perfect chronometry, as those Middle Age dances with death, if I were not inside the super-organism who is dying, if i did not know the cure, if i were not silenced by the Anti-quantum paradox.

But I am; and so like Prometheus I hate all false Gods; like Rilke I wonder if that Universal, perfect game of organisms, and its supreme ‘beauty is only terror that menaces to destroy us’ Like any neuron of the ego centre of your brain that you consider your identity, and suffers for all the body after its death, during that fast regression through its past-memories, i wonder if that is just my role, to suffer, and recollect and reconstruct the ‘history’ of the human super organism, as a prophet=scientist of history, able to predict its future observing its past cycle, does, and have done in all the past civilizations of history, prior to its demise. In that sense, when an organism dies, the pain only affects the neurons of the mind. The body cells feast into the blood, and fatten causing its rigor mortis, as it happens today with mankind, feasting in chaos and pleasures, before the robotic r=evolution ends its life, ignoring as a dead body does, the messages of pain of its social mind.

What is then the function of a neuron in a corpse? None. And that might be the response, to the fact that since the Iron age, all ‘prophets’ of humanism have been discharged by the animetal hordes that carry the species to its demise. That fundamental religious metaphor, of the original sin against the tree of life, for biting the golden apples of the tree of metal and its lethal eviL=anti-live fruits, the weapons that will kill all of us, as they keep evolving, that fundamental metaphor of the prophet of love, killed by the banker-priests of the go(l)d cult(ure), which was said to ‘resurrect’ to save mankind; that goal of ‘egalite, fraternity, equality’, that perfect world, indeed seem to confront in this planet the ‘corruptible nature’ of the humankind. And its freedom to control its future for its own benefit. How society has solved those contradictions? In the most bizarre of ways – by constructing anti-social sciences, a web of idol 0gies and rhetoric concepts, of subjective, happy dreams and fantasies which convert the all too obvious process of self-destruction of humanity into ‘progress’ , the all too obvious degradation of our minds by electronic gadgets into ‘the age of information’, the denial of all social laws of behaviour, into freedom, and so on and so on.

This anti-world, anti-human culture, anti-reality, massive denial and collective madness, is indeed the trademark of our dying species, more obvious in the Y, and Zero generations of mankind.

We are becoming a species of lunatic selfish, bratty children, which are ‘the staple food of the Universe’. ‘The Universe destroys the weak and who are weaker than a child’ said Trotsky, the last r=evolutionary of history who could have changed our collective destiny and he is right. That is why the 3rd, old age, the present neo-paleolithic of history is the mirror image of the young age of the mind. That is why once r=evoution was aborted and the scientific evolution of social history, denied in the American age of mental machines that evolve instead of ours, we live in a kindergarten of monstrous children and egos.
_________
Notes: The Content of this web and its meaning within the Western Tradition.

(1)

The first predictions of the 2001 and 2008 crisis were in fact done by this author back in the 90s, with his discovery of the fractal dual biological, organic nature of the Kondratieff waves of evolution of machines, in his books, ‘The extinction of man’ and ‘Bio-history, Bio-economics’ (94, 97, Bookmasters, Ohio). In those earlier books, we considered the 2008 crisis the beginning of the last century of history, the age of ‘organic machines’ and weapons, as it has been the case. The exact periodicity of the wave is explained in this text and many others of this web.

Kondratieff made a simple error, considering the train wave periodicity in Russia, an underdeveloped country that receive the wave latter. Thus till we correct that error, the cycle was considered to be only of 50 years (see text for a more precise definition of the wave). Now, we know the cycle has a periodicity of 72 years, which corresponds to the generational cycle of human beings and the nations that are on top of each wave: the British cycle of steam machines (1784-1857), then the German cycle of electro-chemical engines (1857-72 years -1929), and finally the American cycle of electronic machines (1929-2001), which ended with the dotcom and derivative crash, a short-product cycle of 7 years later (2008)
Unfortunately economics today, after the ‘ideological cleansing’ of the 80s is no longer a science, but a corrupted, financial ideology of power, as it has been for most of its history, which explains why Kondratieff, a disciple of Marx, despite the truth of his wave-cycle, has never been understood beyond the abstract calculus of future stock prices to speculate on the ‘markets’. For a better mathematical understanding of the fractal structure of the web please read the post on ‘business cycle’ and the next post on the science of history.
(2) Formal elements and hyperlink structure of the web.
The content of this web.
The 2 themes of the web, the evolution of economics and history are resumed in the the central page:

– The first post analyzes the economic ecosystem and its cycles and crisis of evolution and overproduction of machines, whose periodicity, discovered by Kondratieff, allows to forecast their future evolution, as all sciences do, by projecting the events of the past, similar cycles into the future. In that sense to understand this crisis we have to have a historic view and study the previous similar crises of 1929 and 1857 all caused by the invention of new forms of money (stock-paper, ticker money and now e-money) reproduced without limit by corporations, which to that aim limited the rights of governments to invent it.

– And this leads to the second theme/post of the web, The Paradox of History, the confrontation between the economic system and those who rule it with money (corporations) and the historic system and those who rule it with verbal and ethic laws (governments), which in times of crisis break their symbiosis and confront each other both at systemic, structural level and at the human level of those who they represent (the 1% who owns corporations vs. the 99% represented ‘ideally’ by social governments).
We provide on this theme, on both sides a deeper, systemic viewon the evolution of the economic ecosystem and history, in the context of the evolution of this planet, introducing the Laws of general systems and how they apply to the study of ‘memetic cultures’, which can be differentiated between those dedicated to the pursuit of memes of life and those dedicated to the creation and evolution of memes of metal. The web sides with cultures of memes of life, as they are the only ones that could ensure the survival of history.

Then we consider the 5 subsystems of the economic system affected by the crisis of overproduction of electronic machines in more detail, as it is the theme of more interest for the ‘present’ reader:

– The crisis of labor caused by the overproduction of white collar PCs and blue collar robots that automate companies and are making most human workers obsolete.

– The financial crisis caused by the overproduction of e-money and redistribution of rent in favor of speculators.

– The military/war crisis caused by the overproduction of robotic weapons and the creation of ‘splendid little war’ to substitute the demand of consumption machines and take corporations out of the crisis with ‘Keynesian militarism’.

– The ethical and intellectual crisis, caused by the overproduction of information machines, audiovisual media and hate speeches.

– And the corruption of the democratic system and its social consequences for the bulk of mankind. Considering in the final posts 3 cases of the application of the laws of biology and organicism to history and economics:

– The function, form and substance of money, informative metal, whose values rule the world, building the Financial-Media-Industrial-Military Complex.

– The Oedipus paradox in which we compare the human and the metal-kind in objective terms and their differential of evolution

– And Ethonomics, a theoretical example of what a true science of economics would promote and value as wealth if ‘bio-historians’, not financial economists ruled the world.
So we close the central posts with an organic design of an efficient super-organism of history and the measures needed to end the crisis and ensure a future for our species.
A second layer of complexity with a wider latitude in time and space and a more biological, systemic ‘real jargon’ is formed by the upper decametric 3×3+1 posts, in which:

– We extend the analysis of the superorganism of history and its ages in time according to the laws of all general systems that promote the eusocial evolution of the individuals of any species into bigger, more integrated social systems, thanks to a common language of communication and the sharing of energy and information among them; laws which in human cultures were explained with the ethic word by the prophets of social love.
For those who like both form and content, better crafted, written pieces on those themes can be found on my e-books on the subjects treated in this web, offered at reduced prices. You are welcomed to copy and distribute this information as you wish.

(3) UKSS, 2006 conference on ‘the 2008 crisis of e-money-, 2010 ISSS conference on the ’72 years cycle of evolution of machines, weapons and money’ and 2011 ISSS, Hull congress on ‘the evolution of the financial-military-industrial complex’.
these posts followed a series of conferences given at the International Systems Sciences Society, recently erased from google scholar due to the protests of an anonymous ‘minority’ member of the society that threatened with suits according to the present models of censorship in the discipline based in ‘political correctness’, proper of all forms of ‘Intelligent Design’ – some parts follow the arid discourse of papers with a neutral tone, which can be found in my books at kindle, other parts come from a less elaborated, angry ‘stream of consciousness’ on all those themes that the reader can consult the ‘ad lateral’ posts and pages).

 

V. THE LIFE AND DEATH OF THE ORGANISMS OF HISTORY

Note to the reader. This paragraph reaches the maximal complexity on the scientific foundations of Bio-History and Bio-economics, which are the laws of the science of complexity and the metrics of the 5th dimension. I find it fascinating, but you might want to escape to easier to read paragraphs.

 

nj

In the graph, all TIME motions and its still perception as SPATIAL  forms are of 3 types, entropic, energetic, expansive motions, proper of limbs/fields of energy in SPACE-SYSTEMS or relative young, past motions in TIME ages;  reproductive, wave-like body forms and motions;  and finally informative cyclic, implosive motions in Time or particles/heads of information in space.

Reality is an assembly of those 3 types of motions. So when we order them in space, we obtain, the Generator Equation of all Complex Systems of the Universe:

|-Se (Spatial, expansive limbs/fields of energy) < ST-wave-bodies that reproduce energy and information >To ( particles/heads that gauge and store information in its time cycles):

BIDIMENSIONAL

In the graph, some of the systems of nature made of 3 elements, energetic fields/limbs, reproductive waves/bodies and informative heads/particles.

And when we order in time those 3 elements, we obtain the equation of the life-death cycle.

Se (energetic, young age of maximal motion) < ST-mature, reproductive age> To (informative 3rd age of maximal form)

Followed by the ‘endif the cycle’, when all energy is exhausted and the system explodes back into pure energy.

Below we can see the human being from the spatial and temporal perspective of its 3 elements, which we will use latter to explain the evolution of humans as part of the 3 elements an ages of the evolution of all Universal systems:

3 HUMAN ISOMORPHISMS best

This graph defines a humans being with the metrics of the fifth dimension, and its formalism, the Non-AE (non-Aristotelian logic, Non-Euclidean Algebra) of the fractal Universe.

It shows bellow, the order of those 3 motions in sequential time, from a young energetic age, through a reproductive adult age into a 3rd age of information, till all energy is spent and the warped form explodes back into energy in the moment of death, is the fundamental cycle of cyclical time, which in the metrics of the 5th dimension is equivalent to the worldline of 4D physics. Its use to study the life and death of human beings and its social organisms, civilisations, as well as the evolution of machines is the deepest level of understanding of bio-history and bio-economics, way ‘far out’ for a science which still does not even understand what a machine is. But we shall introduce it briefly in order to fully grasp the ages of civilisations and the increasing growth of information in this planet that defines the future of its species.

 

We say that life is a travel through the i-dimensions of social complexity between the past, seminal age of birth and the future, 3rd age of information..

Thus super organisms both in physical and biological systems are, as the graph shows, structured across 3 ‘scalar Dimensions’ of space time: the i-1 cellular, individual and i+1 social scale, which determined the existence of  in time of a life-death cycle of 3±1 Dimensionr or ‘Ages’ for all of them:

–  The seminal i-1 age of birth, which reproduces a system till it emerges into the:

– Individual scale, where the system follows a young age of energy, an adult age of reproduction  in which the individual integrated itself into the i+1 social scale.

– Followed by a 3rd old age of information, which ends with a  reversal of time, or ‘death’ that  returned the system to the i-1 cellular scale.

And so I wrote a simple equation for the life death cycle across its 3 i±1 scales and 3 ‘Ages of time’:

 i-1> Max. E->E=I->Max. I < i-1. 

Then I modelled most systems and languages of the Universe with that formalism, unifying the study of all sciences with them.

In the next graph we can see the life and death of several super organisms of the Universe, which follow similar patterns. Above we can see the life and death o cells, human beings and social cultures, the superorganism of mankind, whose collective subconscious mind, art, follows the same 3 ages of individual life in a decametric, 800 years scale:

3AGES done

In the graph, in the full model of world cycles, Complex sciences use a more sophisticated structure to describe the species of the Universe – the social organism, which exists across 3 ‘different scales’ of size and social organization, the cellular, individual and social scale; through which they perform a past to future ‘life-death cycle’, which is called no longer a ‘world line’ but a ‘world cycle’.

Since systems are born as seminal seeds that grow socially into wholes, joined by networks of information, and then die back into its simpler parts. So they follow a simple cycle based in the 3 only possible type of topological motions of the Universe. And we can see those 3 ‘motions’ of space-time, EITHER SYNCHRONICALLY IN SPACE, AND THEN THEY FORM, THE SUPERORGANISMS OF THE UNIVERSE, SINCE THEY ARE ONLY 3 TOPOLOGICAL MANIFOLDS WITH WHICH ALL SYSTEMS CONSTRUCT ITS 3 ‘PARTS’, both in time and space.

Below, to show the enormous power to describe reality of the formalism of the 5th dimension we see the evolution of some physical systems, through its energy-reproductive-informative ages.

So in Physics I used it to describe all systems in the 3 scales known to man:

– The quantum scale through String theory (also 10 Dimensional systems, across 3 scales of i-1 strings, i-branes and i+1 particles).

– The human scale through the States of matter, the ‘energetic’, gaseous state, the liquid E=I balanced state and the informative, solid state, between ‘plasmatic birth (i-1) and ‘big-bang’ extinction (E=mc2).

– And the Cosmic scale with its Galactic Superorganisms (made of i-1 atoms, which gather into i-stars, which become parts of social i+1 galaxies) and its Universal cycle with 3 ages, described by the 3 solutions to Einstein’s space-time equations: The  ‘big-bang’ youth age of maximal energy, the steady state solution of balance E=I, or ‘adult’ age of the Universe and the 3rd ‘big crunch’ informative collapse (Max. I.)

So i had finally reached the ultimate dream of the polymath and philosopher of science, the quest of human thought for a unifying series of principles that could explain with the same laws all the systems of the Universe and all its scales, each one studied by a different science:

time-dim-ension

In the graph, each science studies a scale of the organic evolution of the Universe. Simplex sciences study each of those scales with different jargons as separate ‘realities’.

What complex sciences had achieved thanks to the understanding of the scalar structure of space-time systems was the discovery of the unifying laws and principles that created systems across each of those scales.

Whereas the relative future is the more complex i+1 social scale that requires the creation before, hence in the past of smaller individual and cellular/atomic forms.

Thus the universe has AN ARROW OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION INTO THE FUTURE, AN ARROW OF EUSOCIAL LOVE THAT FAVORS WHOLES OVER PARTS, which however our capitalist, militaristic, dog-eat-dog aberrant anti-human systems and societies stubbornly DENIES.

In that regard, the pretentious conflict between Biology and Love Religions is FALSE. IT IS THE CAPITALIST-MILITARISTIC TRIBAL SYSTEM, which systematically censors the obvious truth that individuals of the same species must collaborate to survive better, so the 0.1% and its Financial-Media System can be on top, backed by the military-industrial system with its idol-ogies against mankind. And this is a fact that extends to the world of scholarship with its systemic denial of organic models of the Universe and its life-death world cycles that extend even to the Universe itself (big-bang – big crunch cycles, and organisation of particles into atoms, molecules,matter, solar systems and galaxies and cluster of galaxies and Universes).

We talk of a world cycle, all species of the Universe follow which I formalised a decade ago, which adds the ‘5th dimension’ of past to future growth of information or complexity to the 4D metrics of Einstein. At the time, it was the most acclaimed new discovery on time theory since Mr. Einstein’s work. But my activism against the Nuclear Industry, and the ad hominem campaigns that followed, somewhat buried this fundamental discovery with applications to all sciences, just in case people took me seriously on my denounce of Nuclear research, hidden today under the newspeak of knowledge. All what I have to say is what Mr. Einstein told those who in the fascist age parallel to our present neo-fascist age denounced him as a pacifist and burnt his book: ‘those who impose truth with power, will be the laugh of the gods.

But then we MUST WONDER, HOW CAN WE MAKE A SYSTEM IMMORTAL, AVOIDING IT TO ENTER ITS FINAL INFORMATIVE AND DEATH PHASES?

Nature proves this is possible as in a Universe of infinite time arrows of entropy and information, THE TRICK THAT WE OBSERVE IN SIMPLE PARTICLES AND SIMPLE LIVING CREATURES THAT LIVE ETERNALLY IS NOT TO INCREASE THE INFORMATION OF THE SYSTEM – TO REPRESS INFORMATION AND SO THE MANDATE TO MAINTAIN HISTORY, THE SUPERORGANISM OF MANKIND ETERNAL, IS TO HALT THE CHIP RADIATION, THE EVOLUTION OF COMPUTER INFORMATION, TO FORBID LEGALLY NEW PATENTS ON CHIPS, TO STOP THE CHIP RADIATION.

And in history for reasons we shall analyze when studying culture, only the Chinese, with its balanced understanding of the games of yin-information and yang-energy of the Universe understood this fact, and forbade the reproduction of gunpowder weapons, surviving as a culture for 3000 years with little changes, and today are indeed by far the most successful survival culture of history, with 1/4th of the human kind. While the western most obsessed culture of information, the Am Segullah culture of ‘Chosen of Go(l)d’, has the worst survival reckon of mankind – precisely because it IS at the head of the Financial-Media System that multiplies false, mechanical information, digital speculative money and false Abrahamic idol-ogies against the eusocial laws of love to the same species that could ensure the survival of their people and the rest of mankind. And we will return to that.

AND THIS UNIQUE, FUNDAMENTAL SOLUTION TO THE EXTINCTION OF MANKIND IN A GLOBAL ROBOTIC WAR, WHICH I HAVE preached to not avail for 20 years, is exactly what the entire anti-human system today denies.

And the explanation why we are going under, why our society is already in a process of collective death, of destruction of its informative, ethic nervous messages of eusocial love, in a collapse similar to the final death of an organism, when the cells become unconnected. We are AS A SPECIES, AS A SOCIAL SUPERORGANISM, EXACTLY IN THE POINT OF DEATH.

That is, what arrested the development of the human superorganism in the previous stage of fractal nations and tribal Gods, as mankind entered the end of the 3rd age of history, the age of metal information and global wars that will signify our finale as a species, because ‘curiosity kills the cat’, we couldn’t love the genesian life paradise, we had to invent and break the laws of immortality of the Universe:

1. The 3 Ages of History
The present equation of extinction of life Gaia>History>Metal-earth is above illustrated with a graph of the ages of mankind, and the process of life and death of civilisation, killed by those waves of weapons, though, is not deterministic, as long as humans manage the World, but it is increasingly becoming so, as the I.A. of those company-mothers (Information Algorithms, the true meaning of Artificial Intelligence), manage most systems of energy and information of the Universe, and the welfare goods humans need to survive are under produced, with no credit, given the fact that for Corporations, the ‘dictators’ of capitalism, increasingly have no ‘economic use’ for humans, as consumers=vitalizers of machines and workers=reproducers of those selfish memes of metal, increasingly consumed by robotic machines and automated company-mothers. 

Thus the model introduces data in sound cyclical patterns, as the 800-80-8 years cycle of evolution of weapons, machines and money are. Since they have proved for 20 years since the first models of bio-history and bio-economics were printed in the US, forecasting the 2001 and 2008 crisis of electronic money and the 2008 ‘change’ of evolutionary phase of machines from the age of chips to the age of robots, its capacity to predict the future.

Classic economics never passed this ‘second step’ of science. The Economist, its main organ, made long ago a test among university scholars of classic economics ministers of economy and finances, dust collectors and taxi drivers on future indicators and finance ministers and scholars came last. The Economist laughed affirming economics was not a science. This is truth of classic economics, which is so restricted to the point of view of corporate ‘production’ that fails to understand the wider view.

There is however a real science of economics and history, with predictable laws and cycles, which we rescue and further evolve in this web(1).

Indeed, the reader should notice that Mr. Kondratieff, who found those cycles, following the path of Mr. Marx, which first discovered and described those cyclical crises of overproduction of machines; was murdered by Stalin and his work is only known today by… Wall Street speculators, who use merely the mathematical rhythm of those cycles without caring to understand or explain their sociological and existential consequences.

Yet because those cycles are experimentally sound, real and perfectly explained with the laws of biology and evolution, they kept happening, despite the massive opposition of corporations, bankers and governments of any sign to consider their implications (in fact Stalin killed Mr. Kondratieff, because its military dictatorship and worship of machines didn’t fit into them ‘nicely’).

The point here is obvious: classic economics is NOT concerned with understanding the economic system, but with fostering the production of the memes of metal, machines, weapons and money re=produced by company-mothers of machines. Thus it is not a science but a praxis of the Mechanocene, it does not try rationally to understand and guide the system for mankind’s benefit but merely does what the evolutionary process makes easier to do: to evolve and reproduce machines without any interest for its meaning and collateral effects over mankind.

Thus, those are the ‘hard biological facts’ of the political and economic dictatorship of corporations, their offspring of machines and weapons and their ‘idol-ogic elites’, which is bringing humanity towards its demise through a series of predictable cycles of the science of economics and history, which are both mathematical and biological, hence predictable – as long as humans do not manage their future and leave the economic ecosystem to its own Darwinian laws.

Since even this level is now becoming reduced and extinct, as people become lonely Homo Bacteria, unconnected selfish egos. But we can anticipate what this means in terms of social organisms: individual cells become cancerous cells or solitary cells only in processes of extreme sickness, asphyxia, and disconnection from the nervous informative and economic, reproductive systems; mostly after the ‘death’ of those networks, when the informative, corrupted legal/nervous system ceases to exist and control with ethic/painful messages the behavior and coordination of its cells.

The cells still live 3 generations more, even reproduce and decouple after the organism dies. So they become selfish, under rigor mortis, feasting on blood and busting on water, feeding and caring nothing for the collective destiny till the insect/robot or virus that has poisoned the organism kills also the cells.

Now, this is NOT in the metrics of the 5th dimension that studies the social scales of the Universe, and latter we shall merely define in simple terms, an analogy but an homology. The larger the system, the slower the process is. So your cells reproduce live and die in a day, the human in a generation, and the CIVILIZATION IN An 800 years larger decametric scale. As Spengler, Toynbee and this author has shown in its classification of the life and death of all civilization of history.

All this said, you must understand that nations, religions, civilizations and mankind as a whole are indeed superorganisms and we will give you enough proofs of this statement.

We must therefore explain what would truly be a real democracy in which people do control BOTH languages of social power, money and the law, and how if they ‘took’ that control in their hands, ‘naturally’, as it happens in all the efficient social organisms of the Universe that cater to its cells, the existential problems of the world and its billions of human beings living under poverty would be resolved at once.

Since indeed in a Universe in PERPETUAL MOTION, where energy is hyper-abundant, in constant transformation and information is inflationary, the ‘EXCEPTION’, not the rule is to find an organic system, so ill-designed as History is that cannot deliver enough energy and information to all its cells, to coordinate and give energy of motion to the entire superorganism. This must be clear from the beginning: the Universe constantly creates perfect social superorganisms, in which no cells suffer asphyxia as human’s cells do.

On the contrary all have their supply of red blood=money to kick their actions and all of them leave in peace sharing energy and information right efficient blood=economic and informative=legal networks, loving each other, as all individuals of the same species do, specially when they have efficient languages of information to communicate their wantings and work together form the common good.

So the conclusion is obvious: THE SUPERORGANISM OF MANKIND OF WHICH WE ARE ALL LIVING BEINGS, CELLS, is sick, parasitized by cancerous ‘banksters’ who choke the cells of society by absorbing all its oxygen-money, and killed by an invasion of lethal germs, the bad fruits of the tree of technology, weapons and robots, which kill us and displace us from labor and war fields.

But again, only the organic, biological understanding of the laws that design perfect social systems, which this writer has researched for decades as a pioneer of systems sciences, can give us a scientific, objective outlook of the maladies of the present world:

3-ages-of-art

Anti-A Anti-D.  ‘The dismal science’

Now, of course, humans are creating the anthropocene. So we must always consider after developing the 3 empirical elements of science: A-real data, b-biological causes c-cyclical patterns, the D-human praxis that would bend cycles in the favour of mankind also Anti-D, the causes that prevent mankind to thrive, based in the policies of the elites that run the world. Even if systematically this means censorship. And so we shall finish this brief analysis of the overproduction crisis, bringing about the causes of censorship. On one side studying the anti-quantum paradox and on the other the historic memes that make economists to be the essential antidemocratic, anti humanist, anti-anthropocene scientists, hand in hand with the industry of weapons and its ‘anti-humanist physicists’, curiously enough today the most revered ‘experts’ of our societies.

Anti-quantum paradox.

If you have stumble on this blog by chance (out of rankings in google, systematically hacked, and built by a single professor, systematically censored for 20 years, and you like what you read you might wonder why nothing of this is explained, anywhere else despite being so ‘obviously truth’. Only abstract meaningless interpretations of machines as positive to mankind are possible.  Biology and Evolution the ‘law’ of the land, of Gaia, of nature of science is totally ignored in economics and history. Why?

Moreover social sciences censor negative data about machines. Why?

The biological model  does not censor data. As most social scientists do today under the anti-quantum paradox, in order to get economic jobs and scholar positions. Let us then explain what this paradox means, since is the key to understand the lack of scientific models of social history and humanist economics.

Why indeed among all sciences, social sciences, history and economics are NOT following the A to D elements of the scientific method?  Why the world as it is has nothing to do with the world as it should be guided by rational social sciences?

In that regard the most astounding fact of ‘modern science’, is the lack of scientific evolution of social sciences, which has not passed at best the A)level of the scientific method (recollection of data), often not even that step, given the systematic deformation of historic facts by ‘nationalist schools’ and economic ones by ‘capitalist doctrines’ and both by ‘communist dictatorships’.deiIn this manenr Stock-markets invent the future species of our ecosystem by inventing money for certain companies to the exclusion of others. These companies will create then technological products with that speculative money, and sell them, thus expanding these products in society.

In this manner certain products are created, and certain products are eliminated.

The process is simple. A company wants to reproduce a new machine. It then emits money in the form of null-cost paper, in the stock-market. The financial system distributes that money which becomes a physical money [notes]used by the company to buy humans [workers] and reproduction systems [machines, scientists, factories]. The company also buys politicians and laws that will allow the company to become active without any limitations to the destructive power of their products.

Company-mothers have a biological mandate: ‘to evolve and reproduce their products’. All other considerations are secondary within company-mothers. Men in company mothers obey that mandate or else they are fired. So company-mothers do not really act as human organizations, but as machine-mothers, regardless of the fact that they are owned by humans [stockrats].

Company-mothers in turn use that ‘nervous’ money to control human workers and consumers, and their governments. So with salaries, prices, bribes to governments, etc. they order mankind to act in the creation of laws, networks of energy and information that favor machines and the Metal-earth ecosystem.

1166b

In the graph we compare the two macro-organisms of Mankind, History and Economics in its ‘organic evolution’ into a global super organism, according to the laws of General Systems sciences and its decametric, linguistic laws of social evolution.

Human history has failed to evolve into a global super organism, based in the natural language of humans, verbal ethics, and its eusocial memes of love (r=evolution), but machines have evolved through the Internet in a final global super-organism ruled by e-money flows that select its species in worldstock.

THE I-NDIVUAL HUMAN AND ITS 3 FUNDAMENTAL ISOMORPHISMS: AGES, TOPOLOGY AND ACTIONS THROUGH PLANES OF EXISTENCE. 

The two new fields opened by complex sciences: Understanding the social, scalar nature of species and its time-death cycles.

In the graph, a summary of the scales and structure in ‘space’ and ‘time’ of all systems of the Universe. All of them will exist across 3 ∑U±1 scales of social organization, in which they will form an i-ndividual, joined by networks of energy information and reproduction, living a world cycle from birth to extinction across those scales as they ‘exist’, as systems of energy and information, made of ‘energy limbs/fields’, informative particles/heads and its body-wave combinations. Thus all systems will be born in the i-1 seminal scale, grow in size, emerge into and i-ndividual scale, in which they will increase information and reduce energy, from youth – the age of energy to adulthood, the age of balance, to the 3rd informative age, to die back to the cellular scale. And what differs from species are the specific particularities of each scale. What complex sciences does is to lay out the self-similar laws in space (topologies) and time (ages and states) of those systems as they trace their ‘world life cycle’ travelling through those U±1 scales.

The expansion of knowledge achieved by complex sciences with a logic and mathematical formalism to explain the structure of all systems opens two new ‘avenues’ of knowledge, as it adds to simplex models of ‘spatial dimensions and time motions (the 4 dimensions of classic physics) the ‘slow’ cycles of evolution of time from past to future, and the ‘growing organization’ of systems across different scales of size, from atomic to galactic, cellular to social scales.

Those ‘dimensions of time’ and causality, and scales of space, of course, were known to science. We all know that things are born grow evolve reproduce and die. And we all knew that the Universe had scales of size from strings to atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, celestial bodies, galaxies and beyond.

But unlike the formalism of spatial dimensions acquired by physicists through Galileo’s and Einstein’s relativity equations (v=s/t, etc.), till the creation of a mathematical formalism or ‘metrics’ for the scales of social organization of the Universe, we lacked a concept of an ‘arrow of complexity’, of growth of information in the future, which defined both the ‘architectural structure’ of the Universe in organic social scales and the ‘life-death cycle’ performed by all its entities as ‘we travel through the scalar dimensions of size’ in our life-death existences.

Thus Complex sciences is adding two dimensions of logic, causal time, the past with lesser organization (i-1, energy ages) and the future with maximal organization (i+1 scales and 3rd informative age); with the middle steady-state age of balance, the adult age when motions were repeated in a ‘duration or frequency, T=1/ƒ, that created a repetitive presents ready state.

 

5D best

 

In the graph, the compact version of GST (General Systems Theory), studies the whole i-scales of reality from 0 to ∞, that is the Universe as a whole. Since as Plato put it: ‘the Universe is a living organism, with a body called the Universe and a mind called God, ‘Logos’, the Laws of all sciences, which GST represent’.

In the lower graph we observe those planes in the human being. Unlike the abstract graph above, the human graph is truly a graph of our planes of existence, since all the planes we ‘perceive’ interact with us through our 5 fundamental actions, motions (gravitation: ∆0±4), information (light:∆0±3), energy (molecules, ∆0±2), reproduction (∆0±1), and social evolution (∆, i, i+1). We indeed exist by interacting with all those planes of reality.

We call the interactions we develop with the planes of the Universe, ‘ACTIONS’ and so the study of the ‘actions’ of the Universe is one essential element of the 5th dimension, as it reveals an enormous number of symmetries and hidden laws regarding motion, information, energy, reproduction and social evolution.

5 ACTIONS

Another fundamental part of the analysis of the ST=0±4 planes of existence of mankind are the common laws of all those planes, which regardless of its inverse differentiation by speed of temporal clocks and size (Max. S = Min To), still keep many common features derived of the properties of spatial energy and temporal information studied in the previous two posts.

Those  properties that remain invariant as we ‘travel’ through the 9 planes of space-time of the 5th dimension growing in size and diminishing in time speed and vice versa, are called ‘isomorphisms’. And so after studying spatial energy, temporal information its metrics: Se x To = Constant, which define each plane of reality, and the way in which energy and information travel through those planes in inverse directions, we study the common isomorphisms of all those planes, which WILL BE THE ESSENTIAL LAWS, MORPHOLOGIES AND EVENTS OF ALL ITS SPECIES, AS THEY ARE MADE OF SPACE AND TIME.

Again we see how the properties and laws of existential algebra apply to all systems.

Now the purpose of this section is to study ‘mathematically’, with algebraic equations, the previous equation or metrics of space-time, and deduce from it, the main laws that apply to all sciences.

In this text, introductory to the sub posts and detailed analysis of each plane and its species, written in a jargon more proper of hard science i shall try to explain the 5th dimension for people with no knowledge of mathematics or logic but curious about the Universe and intelligent enough to understand sound reasoning.

You don’t need to know more than what a normal university student knows on science to grasp this text, it will though change for better and for ever how you see reality, and make you humble, because what the 5th dimension truly teaches us is that we are just a part of the whole, similar to the smallest atom or the largest galaxy, who follow the same laws of them all, as we are indeed made to the image and likeness of every fractal part of 5th dimension…

Since the results of using multiple times to understand the Universe are startling, providing a wealth of solutions NOT only to physical questions such as the unification of masses and charges, the understanding of the 2 arrows of future, entropy and information, the solution of the meaning of dark matter and energy, but questions of biology and philosophy of science that seemed impossible to resolve, such as the cycle of life and death or the purpose of existence.

 The scalar planes of the Universe.

 

Bell BEST2

In the graph, the scales of the Universe, its 3 time dimensions of evolution of information and their sciences.

If we use the 0<U>9 scale we are referring to increase size IF we use the o±4 scale we consider the human frame of reference.

 

In the graph, we have written the two arrows of time, slow energy and fast information as past and future, and the human time speed as our relative present.

Those scales are indeed the origin of the causal order between past, present and future and their life-death cycles in time.

 

 5th bestsn human

 

But now we knew also about the arrow of evolution in time, of increasing information and complexity across those 3 ages for all species, and it had revealed, an entire new ‘set’ of dimensions, the scalar, social dimensions from microcosms to macrocosms

– This social U±n dimensions, grouped in 3 cellular-individual and social scales were the key to explain the deepest questions of the Universe. How the future was organized through social evolution – why social scales existed, from Gods, the subconscious collective of civilizations, to legal nations, from galaxies, with its cellular stars to multicellular organisms. And obviously those ‘dimensions’ were the key to study social sciences.

And the, there were the combined analysis of how an organism evolved in life and death through those scales, and how it could manage to stay in an immortal steady state of eternal adulthood.

So the perfect life of the individual and the perfect world of mankind could be managed according to the laws actions and behaviors that maximized the ‘existence’ in the middle steady state, which was also the state of maximal connection and action of a being, as it was in contact with its social I-whole, having an active role in the whole organism.

Why then humans do NOT construct a perfect world, with the laws of social super organisms, and halt the evolution of lethal machines that compete with man in labor and war fields and are displacing us from the eco(gnomic)system?

Why humans did not construct a perfect world which was eternal in time and space?

The answer was double theoretical and practical.

Theoretically it was obvious: Because they didn’t have a true science of economics and history, of the economic and political, re=productive and informative, ‘neuronal’ networks of their social organism. And so there was NOT a science of politics, the science of guiding, curing and directing, the physiology of History – the Human super organism – akin to the work of a doctor in the ‘inferior’ i-ndividual human scale.

And they did not have either any idea of what was the life-death cycle of all systems, its laws of evolution, extinction, birth and death.

They were dumber than the dumbest atom which performs with excellence all its motions and phases, and is able to keep immortal by limiting the lethal actions of it organisms.

And so I thought human social scientists could act as ‘bio-historians’ , as doctors of history, and design and regulate any system of reality by understanding its laws, parts, wholes, energy-information exchanges, and in the case of economics (the reproductive network of a civilization) and politics (its informative network) and ecology (its geographic, energy territory), we could create a social science that would understand the hows, the whys and the modes of change of our social reality to manage society and create a perfect world – if we could enlighten our politicos and economists, bankers and military and make them learn a true science of history, and make them abandon the ‘anti quantum paradox’ that confuses ‘power’ with ‘science’, selfish i-agendas with the duty of any i-ndividual part of a neuronal network of information that control a society – which is to serve the cells of the body.

Now the reader will probably be more interested in the i-ndividual ‘ego’, which is its ‘center’ as a human being. And yet in history the function maximized is the ‘world cycle or ‘function of existence’ of all human beings, maximized by the sum of all the cells of mankind: ∑ Max. E x I (e=i).

This goal – to reach the perfect stability of the adulthood or steady state of a system, is thus the goal of History, achieved by the maximization of the life of all its members – not as the present ‘capitalist’ system pretends, by the maximization of the existence of corporations and machines – and as a fringe benefit of the 1% of ‘leisure classes’ (Veblen) that owns those corporations.

So we will refer all our knowledge to that aim.

Let us then deal now with the ‘social scalar dimensions’ of the super organism of history first, departing from the general laws of all super organisms.

Then we will deal with other ‘great advance’ of complex sciences – the life-death cycle, its morphologies ages of evolution and extinction, applied to HISTORY AS IT IS, not as an ideal immortal history, would make it.

The morphology of the Universe – its ternary organs and social classes.

We talked in terms of ‘networks’, that is ‘functions’ of the existence in all super organisms of an informative network, an energetic and a reproductive network (nervous/political, digestive/Gaia, blood/economic networks in the i and i+1 human scales).

But are all the network elements of an organism equal? Or there are ‘social classes’, differentiated organs and cells by their belonging to each of those networks? Obviously this is the case in individual organisms and it is also the case in social ones. So we need to learn the ‘rules’ of differentiation and how to ‘recognize’ the social classes and functions and parts of organisms, which also are the varieties of human social castes and machines…

All systems had a ternary structure made of informative neurons/particles, energetic limbs/fields and reproductive bodies/waves, which worked together for their common good. Those ‘upper’ informative classes, ‘reproductive, working classes’ and ‘energetic mechanisms and fields’, were NEVER in open opposition as the ideology of Marxism had it, nor $elected by God, and without responsibility for each other, as capitalism pretended (latter studied in more detail).

But to fully grasp the ‘ternary structure’ of organisms in symbiotic social classes, we have to introduce concepts of topology and symmetry, between the 3 elements/networks of all organisms.

The next graph shows the general case of all ‘complementary systems’, which in fact are ‘super-organisms’, made of cells, which are also complementary systems, in a scalar fractal Universe in which all its made to the image and likeness of the whole:

In the graph all what exists is a complementary system of networks of energy (bodies/fields/working classes) and information (heads/particles/informative classes), which balance each other, sharing energy and information among them, to reproduce similar systems in other regions of space-time.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity in balance, which can decouple=reproduce creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

In history priests and politicians issue ethic laws to direct a mass of citizens.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.

Any social organism is ruled by those who ‘invent’ the language of social power first, and then those who ‘talk it’ and give orders with it.

So the people who invent laws and talk words on one side and the people who invent money and ‘talk price’ on the other decide the future of the world, and of history – the theme of this blog.

The result is a dual class structure into a neuronal/informative system or ‘class’ that controls with the language of information (nervous, legal order in biologic historic organisms) the blind body of cells that work for them (middle, ‘sheeple’ class in human societies, body organs), to whom it delivers enough energy – ‘blood/money’ – so they can perform their tasks.

This ternary structure cannot be modified if we want an efficient organism, but at the same time, it implies that the ‘head’ obeys the wantings of the body, is responsible for the correct information, and so latter we will see how ‘a proper democracy’ in which the head is controlled by judges/pain messages, and the body receives enough oxygen to survive/money can make more efficient human social super organisms.

Now we shall introduce the more complex concept we will use in those texts, regarding the existence in all systems of ‘informative heads’ and energetic limbs and reproductive bodies, imposed by the dimensional space-time duality of the Universe.

The topologies of 2-manifolds of information.

Now we are giving a conceptual jump that might change the way you look at the Universe a make you abandon this blog due to its complexity. But we truly require to go a little bit deeper in the structure of the organic complex cosmos, so you understand how we humans interact ‘morphologically’ in terms of ‘form’ and function with machines

In Complex sciences dimensions are that important because you are MADE OF THEM. You are made of energy and time, as when you say i don’t have energy and time to do this. That is what you are a time world life-death cycle that occupies a vital space across a cellular individual and social scale.

So to know about dimensions is to know about yourself- a 10 Dimensional being made of space-time, where space and time are merely two way tow perceive the same either moving or with form.

Vital space moving is energy, cycles of time fixed are forms, forms of in-form-ation.

So all is made of planes of space, moving energy and cycles of time, static information.

How we see it is a paradox of perception: we perceive information in stillness, so the mind creates quiet mappings of reality without motion.

The symmetry between ‘spatial morphologies’, ‘organs’ and ‘time ages’

Let us consider only one of those complex laws of systems across its scales, the law that relates the morphology of the organs of a system with its function in space and evolution in time, as it is the basis of the understanding of economics and its relationship with history:

ENERGY VS INFORMATION

In the graph, information is bidimensional (holographic principle) and so systems have only 3 possible ‘bidimensional’ type of surfaces that define:

– Max. E: ‘energetic, planar, lineal limbs’ in all species (so a weapon and an skeleton are both lineal, as they promote motion.

– Max. I: informative organs, which are ‘spherical’., the form that stores more information.

– Max. E xI: Its body-wave combinations.

In the graph we see that simple topological law in humans and machines, which explains their similar functions and the reasons why ‘animetals’ exist, as human functions are enhanced by parallel mechanisms.

And so all systems will be at least made of energetic limbs that move informative heads/particles, which gauge reality, in the dimension of height, where perception is higher thanks to projective geometry.

This meant, as we shall see latter in our analysis of Evolution that systems evolved in height from reptiles that ended becoming birds to galaxies that develop an informative gravitational black hole in its center, to life that evolved in height to reach man. Thus economics and machines are NOT different from any other science that studies organic systems and MUST be studied and designed with those organic and biological laws. The present absurd ‘theological’, ‘capitalist’, ‘tribal’, nationalist concepts used in those sciences are completely out of reason, and have no meaning for the Universe at large, and certainly will not enlighten the future of mankind, as the basis for building efficient, free, complex social systems.

points2

In the graph, the ‘Plan of evolution’ and ‘structure of super organisms’, and its ‘3 networks’ can be studied also from an I-ntegrated point of view as the 3 parts of a ‘whole’.

Then the whole will be made with the only 3 topologies in space of bidimensional ‘membranes’ , the essential part of the Universe.

The graph shows how those 3 topologies combine in the ‘simplest’ of all varieties of organisms, the ‘spherical being’, living in a ‘homogenous’ medium, which provides it with energy and information and allows it to reproduce in a parallel extinction of space-time

All of them will have an external membrane, which will act as ‘rotational limbs’ exchanging energy and information through its ‘sensorial openings’.

This membrane will be enclosing a toroid body, which will cyclically exchange energy and information through networks with a central zero point of information or hyperbolic brain.

The 3 parts will assembly together to form from sea urchins to fetus, from electromagnetic fields to galaxies with black holes, from atoms to tomatoes, from cells to planets. In all of them, the central hyperbolic ‘head’/nucleus, will direct a toroid body, and an external membrane will feed the system with energy.

The next graph shows a different fundamental variety of super organism, one existing not in an homogenous medium but a planar surface, with a relative ‘energy-information’ directionality such as the planet Earth, where the sun provides light and the floor chemical elements. In this system, the morphology of the 3 networks vary and so does its orientation but the ternary structure of the Universe does not change:

In the graph we see how FUNCTION MATTERS MORE THAN FORM, and yet both are in symmetric symbiosis. The galaxy is a ‘homogenous’ organism with a black hole in the center; the plant has also its 3 parts, and it has a root brain with maximal fractal branching to gather more atomic information, while ‘flat’ energy leaves absorb light as energy. Humans though have the inverse orientation as they use light to obtain information and take energy from plants. both predators and preys have inverse functions/forms.

Moreover it is evident that there is a symmetry between the 3 spatial dimensions and its functions, as ‘height is always the dimension of information’ to perceive better, so we have our heads on top in the direction where information comes. Length on the other hand is the dimension of forward motion the most common, and finally, width is the parallel direction of social organization and reproduction.

Thus WE ARE BEINGS MADE OF DIMENSION OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION AND LIVE ACCORDING TO ITS LAWS, OF WHICH THE TERNARY MORPHOLOGY OF SYSTEMS AND ITS 3 AGES IN TIME, WERE THE MOST ASTOUNDIN, perfect symmetry and ‘deterministic law’ of the Universe.

There are thus ‘3 topologies that correspond to the ‘3 components’ in space of any physical or biological system:

– Max. Energy: the energetic, ‘lineal’ limbs/fields, as the line is the shortest distance between two points that dominated the youth of a system.

– Max. information: the spherical, particle/heads of information, since the sphere is the geometry that stores more form in lesser space, that dominated the 3rd age of the system, as the passing of time increased the informative complexity of the system, exhausting its energy.

– And the intermediate, e x i , ‘conic’, ovoid or wave-like ‘bodies’ of the system that reproduced them, and repeated its actions, making the system stable, and ‘immortal’, when an organism could be kept in such a state.

So i extended the analysis of the 3 dimensions of time, to a deeper, ‘topological’ understanding of the ‘morphologies’ in space of all systems; and study with them engineering; and forecasted the evolution of machines, both diachronically (so we made bodies of machines in the XIX c. heads in the XX c. and now we put them into organic robots). This was the beginning of my accurate predictions of the future of economics, where company-mothers evolved and reproduced those machines.

And concluded that all systems of Nature followed the same rules, as we were ‘all’ made of ‘energy, information and its infinite combinations, which dominated those 3 ‘ages’ of time – the age of ‘energy’, the age of balance and reproduction (exi) and the 3rd age of information – symmetric to the 3 ‘components’ of all organisms, machines, and physical systems:

– The energetic limbs/engines/fields, the reproductive wave/factories/bodies and the informative particle/chips/heads.

It was then evident that the deepest understanding of the organisms of the Universe and its 3 parts, organs and ages, was through the study of the 3 ONLY ‘spatial topologies’ that a bidimensional surface, (a 2 manifold) had.

Thus we were all from the external point of view ‘bidimensional membranes’ with 3 type of organs, parallel to the 3 ‘only’ topologies of the 2-manifold Universe – the 3 ‘energetic, informative and body parts’ of any system of nature. And each of those 3 parts dominated each of the 3 ‘ages’ in time of all those systems. The young age dominated by our limbs and motions, the adulthood dominated by the body and our reproduction and the 3rd age dominated by the head of information. The 3 ages of life, were just a consequence of the 3 topologies of space of our bidimensional membrane of information. We were topological organisms living as such.

And so where machines which could relate to us through their equivalent morphologies making us stronger bodies and smarter heads – or so it seems initially.

In any case ‘hooking us’ , making us addicts to them. To fully grasp this, we shall now introduce the evolution of life in this planet, according to those 3 ages and morphologies of time and space of the Universe at large.

Since machines followed the same organic laws, and our relationships with them are equivalent to those of animals among them.

The formalism of Complex Sciences applied to ‘Socio-Biological’ systems.

– It came next the application of those fascinating discoveries and symmetries to biology, from genetic studies (the relationship between the i-1 scale that coded the i-ndividual one) to physiology.

I also used it to study the morphology of all systems made with Energetic Limbs, reproductive bodies and informative heads, which evolved in 3 ‘scales’ , the cellular, organic and species state. So me dine, was the study of the energetic, digestive, reproductive, blood and informative networks of the human organism and its balances with the cellular scale.

-It followed that in the i+1 scale there were also such 3 networks, the political informative system, the economic, reproductive system and the energetic geography of Gaia. And we could also establish a ‘medical discipline’ for history, as the laws of all systems were the same. So in the same manner we could cure the sickness of a cellular organism, we could solve and cure human social systems, in which we all humans were citizen cells. And so I designed a perfect world. One in which all human beings would have as cells do in a body enough energy and information to survive and thrive.

The interaction of the 3 x 3 scales of existence.

 

 In the graph the 3 existential scales of humanity: The evolution of an organism happens through the interaction of its 3±i planes existence, which in man are its ecosystemic, social level; its organic, biological level and its cellular, genetic plane. This law of Evolution finds its whys in the 4th postulate of i-logic geometry. In that sense, life between birth as a cell and extinction can be considered a trip through those 3 planes of existence.

image058

In the fractal Universe all the scales are organized in ternary sub-scales, which co-act together to develop according to the isomorphisms of General Systems complex organisms. The main relationship between those scales are those of affinity, ‘—motions’/information morphology and synchronicity.

Consider for example the sexual differentiation between lineal male energetic expansive bodies and informative, cyclical informative women. Biologists still wonder why it exists if an asexual hermaphrodite species have advantage as both males and females give offspring. Thus if each gives 2, then from 1 we get 2 and for each 10th repetition (standard decametric scale in time of all systems), there are 103 spatial individuals, ( 10 t = 103 e, a basic power law that shows the potency and primacy of temporal change over spatial extension). Yet if both are sexually different as the male doesn’t reproduce the species will remain with only 2 individuals.

This now has a simple explanation: systems constantly diverge between energetic and informative subspecies, as part of the natural program of a Universe with two variables.

Further on this basic duality transfers from scale to scale. So informative systems are implosive and we observe this morphology in multiple informative life systems, but we have to find and interpret them: For example, the cell is mostly spherical as a unit of life and center of information. And this goes at its 3 levels. At molecular level, Nucleotides are the informative species. Proteins are the reproductive ones, fats are the lineal energetic species. At PH level, positive basic are implosive, negative acids are explosive. And so the cell, as an informative system has a high Ph. It is a base. And when we consider the two basic hormones that define sex, their only difference is that the male hormone, testosterone has a negative, acid 0, where the female hormone has an OH base. And so one hormone will activate energetic actions and the other will more often activate implosive ones.

The dame goes for amino acid triplet structure. At atomic level the structure has a positive, attractive, amino group, or head, and an oxygen, negative, energetic limbs, with a neutral, structural, formal Carbohydrate. And those amino acids that have lateral energetic oxygens activate energetic responses (serine etc.). So the triadic forms and functions both in space (morphology), in time (ages) and in scales (hierarchy), keep structuring the universal game as it grows from parts into wholes.

And the same happens in the next triad of scales, that between cells, organs and the living organism; and then again between organisms, ecosystems and the mother Earth.

 

In Multiple space-times Theory there is not only individual evolution but also hierarchical, social, scalar evolution, through the ±i 3-scalar structures of all spacetime systems. Such triad of ‘organic scales’ illustrated in the graph defines the existence of an organism, at the st-1 cellular, genetic scale, at the st-scale of physiological networks and individual organisms, and at the st+1 scale of species and ecosystems in which they exist, exchanging Motions and information.

Since we already studied the trip of life between those 3 planes in our lectures on i-logic geometry, we shall now consider another key element of all systems of multiple spaces-times, the synchronicity between the microcosmic and macrocosmic planes that determine with its massive changes in ‘—motions’ and information parameters the destiny and evolution of the smaller parts.

In that regard, the evolutionary changes of animal phyla that brought man from the initial cell have to be considered from the perspectives of those synchronicities between the 3 scales.

Take the most famous event on life history; the creation of multi-cellular organisms that happened in the Pre-Cambrian age when the survival game of existence made it ‘necessary’ due to the simultaneous interaction of those 3 st-levels:

– st+1: The Earth passed by an icy period in which cells overpopulated the remaining hot spots. And so as the informative density of cells and its evolutionary speed increased in those tiny spots, it provoked the merging, cannibalism and social evolution of prokaryotic cells into eukaryotes. Thus the creation of new life species was accompanied by a raise in its survival stakes, caused by the activities of the global ecosystem that accelerated the process. Since once and again the Earth’s glaciations will cross those new accelerated, evolutionary discontinuums.

st: Yet those Earth’s changes don’t evolve organisms ‘per se’, but trigger their competence, which causes their evolution. So the will to evolve socially exists in the organism not in the ecosystem that merely sparks off the process. For example, multicellular organisms were born in a similar fashion to eukaryotic cells, when an ice-ball age packed cells into underwater volcanoes, which developed social strategies to hunt together individual cells.

– st-1: However, unicellular cells existed also in earlier glaciations and yet they did not evolve then. Their evolution only happened in the Pre-Cambrian age in the precise moment in which also at genetic level the so-called intronic DNA4 multiplied the capacity to codify genetically complex multicellular tissues – since redundant, intronic DNA, in charge of the regulation of complex organisms, appeared in the Pre-Cambrian age. Thus only when the 3 ‘hierarchical levels’, the genetic, organic and environmental acted simultaneously that explosion of life was possible.

Thus again we find a case of ternary causality is needed to fully account as in most process for an event which Aristotelian unicausality cannot explain alone, but merely divide scholars in opposite positions, making truth Leonardo’s ex-abrupt: ‘the only harmonious sound found in a meeting of scholars are the winds of their asses.’ Hopefully the 4th paradigm will resolve that (-;

Again in the next evolutionary explosion at the end of the Cambrian age, the 3 levels acted simultaneously:

At organic level, the chemical systems that dominated life on that age gave birth to the first visual systems, which in the late Cambrian triggered a new massive evolutionary age with the arrival of squids with eyes. Those squids evolved in the still, lower, bio-luminescent zones of oceans, during the parallel massive changes in the forms of continents that sank the border zones of shallow waters, accelerating extinction of ‘obsolete’ smelling animals without eyes. Finally, the 3rd cause made it all possible: certain eye genes appeared and made possible the creation of the most complex sensorial organ of life.

What is the order of control between those 3 levels? They are apparently simultaneous but a detailed analysis of the pre-Cambrian episode shows that the Earth changed first, and its changes in Motions and form implied higher survival stakes among individual cells that caused their evolution, as they came together and started to exchange genetic material, provoking ‘accidental’ mixes with redundant intronic genes that were finally used to control the multi-cellular organism.

Thus, again we find that unicausality, which considers only the lineal arrow that goes from genes to organisms, misses the second dual arrow that causes evolution from the higher organic st-system down to the genetic scale; as it happens once and again in all types of Space-Time systems. Indeed, we have to put together the pieces of a car to create the car; but the human designer exists and ultimately in the Universe at large the i-logic isomorphisms of multiple spaces-times are the designer that chains the different ±i-levels of an organism; controlling it also from top to bottom in the same degree that st-1 levels control it from the bottom to the top. In that regard genetics, has to accept some fundamental principles of multiple space scales and multiple causal systems:

Past (‘—motions’, microcosms) x Future (information, macrocosms) = Present st-scale of the organism.

‘The plane of existence with higher exo force determines the direction of future’

Or in other words the small and visible quanta of ‘—motions’ do not determine all the events of biological reality even if we perceive them easily; since it is the whole and its networks of information, which curve and form ‘spatial ‘—motions’’. Yet since the more complex systems are more difficult to decipher and information/future systems are smaller, faster and often invisible, it is a rule of scientific inquire during the metric paradigm to work only with an entropic, spatial, explosive, hot, microcosmic first cause. And then as science evolves contradictions impose revisions that prime a second informative, temporal, implosive, cyclical, cold cause.

So genetic quanta determine an organism in the same or lesser degree than its ecosystem – a fact, which of course, has certain metaphysical implications, when applied to the biggest organism of it all – the Universe: the ultimate cause of it all might be the big-bang singularity – the genetic memory of a previous Universe that will develop according to the isomorphisms of i-logic geometry, the mind of the Universe, its ultimate cause.

That mind-singularity came before its Universal body – it was the eternal informative code of reality.

Let us now consider how the main isomorphisms and creative differentiation of such Universal ‘plan of evolution’ affects those 3 hierarchical levels of living organisms in more detail.

st-1. Ternary differentiations on the genetic and cellular level.

The cellular level was fundamental to the process of evolution in its first stages in which cells differentiated and multiplied its e-exo-o varieties, creating a decametric scale, origin of the subsequent differentiation of organic networks and tissues into 3X3+(st+1)=10 fundamental types whose forms and function can be explained as ternary differentiations of the 3 topological species and its 9 dimensional functions.

Yet cells also act through the genetic level, codifying not only the creation of life molecules but also the higher organic scale through epigenetic, intron and redundant RNA and DNA material, which started the massive differentiation of species in the pre-Cambrian age. Epigenetics should work following the hierarchical and multifunctional principles of multiple spaces & times, coding sub-structures of higher complexity that scientists still need to decode, as the decametric scales of multiple spaces-times tend to generate 3×3+(st+1) structures, with new functions closer to the higher levels of the organism.

So the informative DNA is the highest scale of existence or ‘will of the cell’ and it has a lot of redundant extra-RNA that it should use together with the hormonal language to ‘dialog’ socially with other cells in/forming the functions of social tissues. Hormones should establish ‘spatial dialogues’ and redundant RNA temporal dialogues to code those systems. And both languages together should create the higher st+1 organic cycles and spatial structures of the organism.

Finally on top of both informative systems, the ternary principle adds the brain’s nervous impulses to fine-tune those 2 languages with military precision, as indeed nerves can ‘kill’ as military do, undisciplined subjects/cells.

Ternary differentiations at individual, organic level.

In the biological, organic level, evolution is fostered by the fundamental differentiations of any ∑E<=>∑2 O, relative space-time field that cause a ‘limited’ number of possible formal species:

-∑: Fractal differentiations between big, single animals Vs. smaller animals with multiple parts that become their preys: for example, single eyes and single bodies in molluscs Vs. multiple eyes and body parts in insects. They prove that single informative networks are more efficient that loose herds.

Big bang/energetic vs. big banging/reproductive rhythms/ differentiations during the embryo stage, in which organisms establish 2 strategies of reproductive, cellular growth:

Acoelomate and Seudocoelomate are big-bang organisms, which multiply its cells in a dense ball without inner cavities. Hence its size is minimal.

– Those organisms evolved latter into Coelomate, organized with the topological structure of st-points. Since they have 2 internal bilateral ‘big-bang cavities’ that grow much larger by invagination, in which the future EXO cyclical organs of exchange of ‘—motions’ and information (digestive, lung and vascular tissue) will develop. Those cavities are surrounded by inner and outer tissue that will form the external membrane or skin and the inner nervous, informative systems. Coelomate further differentiated according to the Ternary, Fractal Principle in new subclasses and grew into larger organisms, expanding further those cavities. So today most animals are Coelomate.

– The Fractal, Ternary Principle in Space (3 topologies, 3 differentiations) and Time (3 causes, 3 horizons) also explains:

        – The evolutionary differentiations in time of species through 3 horizons of increasing informative and social evolution, from individuals to herds to tighter organisms.

– The 3 networks/organs in space of those species – the energetic, digestive network, the informative nervous or hormonal network and the reproductive network – which further evolved as they increased its informative complexity towards ‘the future’ in 3×3+(st+1) tissues and networks.

– Both processes together determined the organic evolution of animals, as each new top predator improves its organic networks, displacing a previous top predator. So mammals improved their blood, ‘—motions’, nervous and reproductive systems, displacing reptiles and men improved their brains, displacing mammals.

– Finally the different dualities and inversions of space-time manifest in organic life through:

– Spatial Symmetries (left to right) called bilateralism.

– Asymmetries of temporal, hierarchical dimensions, since informative heads dominate reproductive bodies and are placed always on top in the dimension of height.

Chemical and electrical languages. The duality body-brain shows in the interaction between the reproductive blood network that dominates the spatial body and the informative network that dominates the brain and nervous system. Nervous cells and languages control chemical languages and cells by creating simultaneously informative, nervous orders and chemical, energetic orders that arrive latter to the cells, reinforcing the electric message. So within the organism, neuro-secretory cells make and pour hormones to the blood network, while sending messages to the nervous system that will arrive first as advanced orders. Another example happens in the brain: electric neurons translate nervous impulses into chemical hormones and ‘calcium waves’ that reinforce the message, transferring it to the chemical cells. This primacy of faster, informative systems happens also in ecosystems: a nervous animal species preys on chemical plants.

– The Black Hole paradox. That dominance of information over Motions shows also in the competence between species: Top Predator brains win over top predator bodies, thanks to their faster fractal or social actions that give them more OXE force per unit of time. So mammals win over dinosaurs and chips control machines. This means that a dominant species often is born as a small, fast form (Min. E=Max.O) that latter grows in size.

The Oedipus paradox: The growth of complexity with the passing of time shows in the fact that new top predator species grow by feeding in previous, parental species, which become the ‘Motions’ of their reproduction, as they share and compete in the same environment. So animals fed their son species, men; and men feed their son species, machine-weapons, evolved in wars.

The ecosystemic and geological level.

The planet acts on life at ecosystemic level, establishing the settings for prey-predator events and the conditions for evolution that can be summoned up in a word, Geographical isolation5:

Evolution is dangerous. Since during the mutational phase the underdeveloped new organs hinder the survival of the being. For that reason the 3 ‘scales’ act simultaneously to accelerate evolution:

– st-1: At genetic level, organisms suffer a change in their time speed, increasing its fractal, informative mutations.

– st: At organic level species follow a plan, provided by the lineal-cyclical duality of spatial and informative shapes, the only 2 possible paths of morphological evolution. It requires also the extra exo force provided by top predators. So species use only a little amount of its OXE force externally to absorb Motions, changing its Motions/information rhythm, e->O, from spatial movement in search of Motions into inward, temporal, informative mutations.

– st+1: At ecosystemic level a species requires a secluded environment in which he won’t be menaced by top predators during the short time in which the evolutionary program dwindles survival chances; creating also densely populated regions that multiply the speed of informative change. For example, amoebas, fishes and amphibians were born in fresh water, a relatively secluded environment; while anaerobic bacteria, animal life and cephalopods, probably came from abyssal places, another secluded region. Finally, apes and birds came from secluded trees.

Without that synergy between the 3 scales of existence organisms would never evolve but become extinct during the supposedly chaotic ages of mutational evolution. Yet once the new form is found its survival chances improve geometrically, since it has evolved positively according to the i-logic plan, hence reaching a higher exo force. Then the being gets out of the secluded environment and changes back its I->E rhythm, starting a spatial, reproductive radiation, becoming a new top predator.

Thus, a ternary e->oxe->o rhythm of evolution-reproduction-Motions feeding is proper of all successful species.

-Finally the st+1 Geological and climatic changes accelerate both: Extinction processes, especially among species of shallow waters that live in sea platforms, destroyed periodically by continental collisions) or species which depend on external temperature to regulate their metabolism (reptiles); and evolutionary processes, as they rise the ‘stakes of survival’ and establish a climatic parallel Se<=>To rhythm; as cold zones foster informative evolution.

All those environmental differentiations can be resumed in a word, Hierarchy, which manifests in the restrictions imposed by the higher ecosystemic planes of existence to the organism. For example, as animals migrated first from seawater to river and shallow waters, then into land, the transparent air environment eased their sensorial vision and so it fostered their informative, electronic, nervous evolution and developed further the informative dimension of height from where light comes.

Recap. The ternary principle of multicausality explains how the genetic, individual and ecosystemic planes of life existence simultaneously caused the great changes in the evolution of species. Those 3 levels of change co-act simultaneously since they are relative past, present and future levels that come together in the creation of the organism. That is, genes do not impose evolution to organisms that impose evolution to ecosystems, but according to Non AE-logic the 3 levels co-exist in a relative present, influencing each other and co-evolving together creating new species with higher information and OXE force, the arrow of future in all ecosystems and worlds from the Earth, to the galaxy, a growing vortex of informative species with higher mass towards its center. Thus 3 scales and the ternary, fractal principles – the plan of evolution – suffice to explain the evolution of life from molecules to human beings.

 

 

THE EVOLUTION OF MAN: TERNARY SPECIES.

1123image055

The evolution of man: Ternary differentiations.

Complexity defines a Ternary game of evolution by differentiating species in informative and energetic species, combined in balanced organisms. The same game evolved man from the original ape 5 million ago into the human being. Moreover the differentiation is established first from an initial top, predatory, young energetic species (the gorilla in the human case), that diverts into a reproductive, mature species (the chimp bonobo) and finally in its 3rd informative age gives birth to a more mental species (the Australopithecus). This thesis of multiple spaces-times first established in the foundational book of this science 20 years ago, was confirmed with the discovery of the exact genetic clock: the divergence between gorillas and chimpanzees is 1.17, then the genetic clock diverges 1.17 to create man… Thus the same plan of evolution, which we used to describe all other biological species of the Universe created man from Mr. Ape.

Moreover, the Universe has 3±i arrows/dimensions of creation, energetic length, informative height and balanced=symmetric, bilateral reproductive width. This simple dimensional game happens even in man. Yet bilateral systems often are also dual: one side is slightly ‘—motions’ dominant and the other slightly informative, offering a more complex, kaleidoscopic higher truth (multiple p.o.v.s). It is also a sexual principle: Women are information-dominant; males are ‘—motions’ dominant. And it should find wider applications to understand the dualities of the brain.

Such topological analysis confirms our informative nature:

In human evolution the ternary principle applies beyond the triad of apes: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex=informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher ‘—motions’ x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energetic top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they learned to control complex motion in the dimension of informative height, adding a 3rd spatial dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species.

In the graph we study the ternary process responsible for the creation of humanity:  Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between ‘—motions’ and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±i horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.

And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in ‘—motions’ (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, ‘—motions’ and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.

Thus from an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:

—  Max. E: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.

—   E=O: The chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the Pan Paniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes. It is:

—   Max.O: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:

I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.

We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago are:

—  Max. E: The Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is the Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.

—  E=O. The Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa as a contemporary of the Paranthropus.

—  Max.O: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is the form, which holds more information in lesser space.

Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative Homos. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favored their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:

—  Max. E: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.

—  E=O: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.

—  Max.O. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.

II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens.

That Homo Ergaster, after a massive age of reproduction and expansion throughout the planet, subdivides again in 3 sub-races of Homo Erectus.

—  Max.E: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.

—  E=O: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.

—  Max.O: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black Hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered3, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.

Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopatric evolution). Thus, he adds now technological ‘—motions’ weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new ‘—motions’/information duality:

The energetic, big Neanderthal and the informative Bushman, which combine again to give birth to multiple races.

Those predictions based in the ternary principle and the Black Hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) have been confirmed by genetic maps and Paleontology and await final confirmation when new skulls of Floresiensis are found.

The 3rd, informative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.
image057

— The lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.

— A second informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman, the mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.

± 80.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).

± 40.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the Capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced E=O, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.

Cultural races

Further on, as racial tribes evolved socially and emerged into cultural societies, which are super-organisms of history, the ternary, racial division of mankind between energetic white men, informative Mongoloid and vitalist blacks, will become the cultural differentiation of human beings in 3 type of brain orientations, and hence cultures of the mind according to the 3 elements of all systems, ‘—motions’, information and its reproductive combination; reflected in 3 types of brain morphology:

— ‘Visual, energetic, lineal, spatial cultures’, proper of the white man, with his concepts of lineal time and his passion for technological, energetic weapons and individual, selfish behavior. It is the dolichocephalic brain dominated by the visual eye to Occipital axis, also dominant in the Homo Neanderthal.

—    ‘Cyclical, informative, mongoloid cultures’, natural to Asian civilizations, with cyclical concepts of time. It is the brachycephalic, wide, verbal brain; dominant in the ear axis; hence giving birth to female, eusocial cultures like the Chinese.

—    And ‘sensory, reproductive, colored cultures’, which in Africa and India developed human senses to their limits. It is dominant in the height/medullar axis with a ‘tall head’, peaking in the top/motor and sensorial area.

The culture/age better for the survival of mankind, as in all species, is the one that balances both arrows, E=O. Thus we should promote paradoxically the culture that a technological civilization discriminates: the black, reproductive, sensory culture.

Let us study them in more detail how the ternary differentiation that created humans being from apes explains racial differentiation by establishing 3 types of minds:

The 3 types of minds: Emotional, visual and verbal brains.

The existence of 3 dominant human races today, the white, yellow and black people, cannot be argued, but they must be interpreted as 3 types of complementary intelligence, based in our recent discoveries on the science of Complexity, which always favors a ternary process of creation, with an energetic, informative and reproductive ‘decoupling’ along the 3 morphological dimensions or ”axis’ of any space-time form. In the case of the brain, there are 3 axes, the long visual axis, the tall emotional axis and the wide, verbal axis, and so we talk of 3 mental races:

–  The dolichocephalic brain, which overdeveloped visual axis, from the eye to the occipital bone. It is the white man.

– The brachiocephalic brain with an overdeveloped verbal axis from ear to ear. It is the mongoloid race.

– The makrocephalic brain11, with an overdeveloped emotional axis, from neck to top of the head. It is the black race.

They maximize the 3 types of human minds: energetic races (white, visual, spatial, egocentric); informative races (yellow, verbal, temporal, eusocial), and reproductive races (black, emotional, inwards, etho-centric):

– Max. E: Visual, spatial, energetic minds.


image060

In the symmetry of time and space, is the case of the first age or ‘’child and the ‘male’ species of the white races and in the earlier anthropological record, it is the Neanderthal, which we already considered 20 years ago as Cohn did, to be co-father of the white man born as Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, which recently the genetic record has proved:

White people, who occupy the same range than Neanderthals are easily recognized by their dolichocephalic head and occipital bulk, their eye=I oriented mind, individualistic ego and energetic behavior. Their languages are consonantal, with few vowels. They have red hair and Rh- (a sign of crossing between different species, whose 2nd generation is not fertile, as mules born from asses and horses are). Further Neanderthal traits – white skin, hooked nose, wide hips – also recognizable in the Basque, Iberian, Germanic, Celtic and Semitic cultures, paradigms of visual cultures, which will make of shiny metal, weapons and go(l)d, their fetish – seem to validate further this thesis. In economics, it gives birth to the gold fevers of those cultures, origin of ‘greed’, an emotional, visual trait which other types of human minds (Chinese) hardly suffered:

Thus the white man should be properly called Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis, dominant in visual information with minimal development on the parietal regions of speech. He will thus evolve the visual language in its 10th ‘Brodmann’ region of rational thought further into digital, geometric and mathematical thought, and create lineal civilizations based in metal, lineal time and Aristotelian thought. He can be sub-divided in two types, which again recent experimental proofs seem to validate:

-The Semite, in which Neanderthal males mixed with verbal women, but Neanderthal females did not cross with dwarf verbal men, creating a mixed race with an extreme sexual dimorphism (taller male, smaller women). A similar case will happen in South-America where conquistadors mixed with Amerindian females but Amerindians did not cross with Spanish women, since the dominant warrior, stronger species, in the first crossing of the Homo Sapiens, in 80.000 BC was the Neanderthal and in the first crossing of the Atlantic the Spaniard.

This theory advanced in my earlier books C,1 has now proofs in the genetic record. The result is the Semite with a dominant bigger, highly aggressive, visual male and a smaller emotional woman. The reason of this military superiority is the fact that at that time the Homo Sapiens had not developed the arch and so it was dominated by the Neanderthal, stronger javelin warrior. Then in the Altai mountains, homo sapiens evolved into the mongoloid Cro-Magnon which invented the arc and hence could kill at distance the Neanderthal. This man went down to Europe and the mixing process was reversed:

Now Homo Sapiens mixed with stronger Neanderthal women (more pure among Nordic and Scottish Women with red and blonde hair, dolichocephalic, visually oriented, often sexually dominant). Thus the Indo-European race was born. This last detail of Complex theory of human evolution should wait for further genetic analysis since so far we have only observed that with a 90% of equality between men and Neanderthals and a 4% of Neanderthal genes there is mixing both in Semitic, white and Cro-Magnon (northern Chinese) groups.

-Max.O: Verbal, temporal, informative minds.

Ulan Batar July 2006 011This is the case in time symmetry of old people; in the symmetry of gender latter studied in more detail of the ‘female’ species and in the symmetry of race of the yellow race; and in the earlier racial record, of the parental capoid, Homo Sapiens Sapiens. All of them are head-dominant, with clear neoteny features (thus with lesser young, energetic development), smaller in spatial body, with a dominant brachycephalic brain, and wider face, as the main linguistic part of the brain, the Brocca region, goes across from ear to ear. Thus, the mongoloid race and the female gender are dominant in the verbal, wide axis. Hence the distance between the eyes and the parietal is larger and their eyes are wider.

As all informative species the mongoloid is highly social, group oriented, selfless, as it uses the verbal language to create their super-organisms of history. Their language has an excess of informative vowels over energetic consonants; women play a greater role even in Semitic culture (Indonesian Muslims). They are less violent, highly intelligent (Chinese test 10 points more than white men), and have shown as all species that can evolve socially the highest record of survival compared to the original Semitic cultures, which base their societies in the power of metal greed and murder, gold slavery and iron weapons.

-ExO: Reproductive, emotional, body oriented cultures.


image064

A 3rd type of culture, whose minds are dominated by emotional sensorial, body oriented, reproductive drives, is the black culture and the adolescent. Its brain is taller, with the top point in the upper head, as the dominant direction comes from the spinal-hypothalamus axis upwards. Thus, the brain regions most developed in emotional races happen along the ‘height’ axis. They are the inner regions of emotional thought (limbic system) and the motor and sensorial cortex on top. This hypothesis, extracted from our models of complexity and duality developed in the 90s have now increasing evidence: women are found to be wired inwards with more connections going towards the Hypothalamus than men, wired outwards towards the visual regions. And certainly both, black and female ‘races/genres’ show higher development of the emotional brain and excel in tasks related to the body/senses.

Psychological characters

Those findings are applied also to the will and drives of the mind: – Max.O: There are people who psychologists define as picnic, nervous, tall (height is the dimension of information).

– Max.E: There are athletic, sanguineous people, dominated by their energetic will.

-E=O: There are viscerotonic people, driven by their ‘lower passions’ (-;

Those distinctions already observed in XIX C. studies on brain morphology and cultural psychology are real, increasingly proved by a wide number of research papers that go from the analysis of why men draw better maps and women talk more to genetic studies in linguistics and bio-chemistry that validate our 20 year old research in those fields. Racism consists in thinking that a visual brain is better than an emotional brain or a verbal brain.

A key question in a biological world is the choice of which of those cultures, personalities and genders should be the referent for the rest of mankind, in order to maximize the goals of all super-organisms and species – survival. And the surprising yet evident truth of an organic model of the Universe is that the Makrocephalic, ethnocentric and verbal, brachycephalic feminine gender should dominate with its balance and ethic sense of survival the violent, visual, technological civilization of the white man, whose ‘energetic’ impulses are taking this planet out of balance, destroying Nature and building the new forms of ‘metalife’ (weapons, robots, A.I.) and machines of the singularity that will extinguish us. Yet this is not obvious because the 3rd paradigm of measure has no organic whys, despises life and ‘sees’ only reality with machines, it does not feel it or understand the deepest game of existence we have explained here. So we are walking steadily towards the extinction of history , the 10th and last extinction of life on Earth, guided by the visual wanting of the Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, its lineal, energetic weapons and hypnotic go(l)d, themes those we will treat in depth in the last lessons.

White matter/Grey matter brain: ternary analysis.

image067

Let us consider the brain under the ternary principle in its topology, ages and fractal st-planes12.

Topological analysis

In the graph, the 3 brains of the human being from a spatial, topological perspective:

– Max.O: Our external, sensorial grey matter.

-Max. E: our internal, emotional, limbic system.

– E=O: Combined in a white matter, memorial, reproductive brain.

We perceive with our senses; whose perceptions are processed by the DNA rich, cyclical, fluctuating, integrating cells of the grey matter brain, and then the outcome becomes imprinted in resistant white matter networks made of axon-connections. This external program mixes with an internal program coming from the body, which defines our wanting for ‘—motions’ and reproduction (sexuality), the main arrows of time of the body and limbs; whose wanting are processed by the limbic brain.

Then both programs converge into the axons. Both programs, the one of the body and the one of the brain, thus, mix and create together the white matter brain of beliefs that define our actions, memories and behavior in a greater measure, which in women are more wired to the limbic brain and in men to the grey matter and eye senses. Because women have more axons wired to the limbic system, they live more for themselves, inward-looking, emotionally-driven. Because men have more axons connected to the grey matter brain and their external, visual senses, they are more connected to space, mathematical-technological objects and motions within external space.

Temporal analysis

image065

A key element to understand memetic imprinting is the inflexibility of the brain beyond 40 years. This was understood by the Greeks which divided life in two ages, till 40 (acne) when the brain peaks in informative power, which was considered the summit of life and then all was downwards till our end at the end of the mean generational cycle of ±80 years.

Thus the 3 layers of the brain are imprinted only in the ‘1st part of existence’, before the curve of life goes down in the 3rd age, since we only learn in that first part of existence. And this makes most people during the time in which they exercise social power, inflexible, memetic programs that will never learn but merely exercise their emotional imprinting converted in beliefs; disconnected from the ever evolving FMI complex, whose challenges they will be unable to resolve.

In that regard, within that ½ fraction of existence, in the child age the limbic system dominates; in the adolescence and earlier, mature age the grey matter brain learns, reasons and imprints the white matter brain, which will dominate the adult age in which we live according to beliefs, which are more difficult to change as the variability of the white matter brain is restricted once those connections are fixed. As that period of life roughly extends from 30 to 80 years old, this means most humans are neither rational, nor emotional but basically ‘programs’ with a ‘motherboard’ of fixed beliefs and chains of rational thoughts, which make us perform the same routine actions the rest of our lives – not very different from the fixed forms of any computer system.

Fractal analysis

image069

In the previous graph, left center the fractal analysis connects Multiple space-times theory with the Freudian psychology as the 3 regions of the brain can be considered 3 hierarchical layers, with a grey matter brain that senses reality and delivers information to the subconscious, limbic, survival brain that acts restricting the information that becomes imprinted in the long memory of the white matter brain.

Freud rightly understood the ‘limits’ of rational thought, due to the subconscious, powerful Super-ego, the memetic super-structures that society establishes to control and repress the biological, natural genetic program of life and love.

In Complexity, the brain is a fractal system of 3 ‘sub-brains’, the subconscious, energetic, limbic system, of ‘short memory’, survival instincts and basic actions, the, white matter, the ‘fixed circuit’ of beliefs, imprinted in childhood by biological desires, the drives codes by genes and in youth by cultural memes, the drives of the super-organisms of history; and finally the grey matter, the rational, thinking, variable brain connected to the truth of external senses.

The most common trajectory of thought through those layers is during the young, emotional age:

External world->Senses->grey matter brain->Limbic censorship->Impression in the white matter brain->Actions

While as the organism matures, the limbic system loses importance and the grey matter brain connects to the white matter brain directly:

Outer World->Senses->grey matter brain-> white matter Printing->actions

On the other hand, people dominant in emotions and inward thought might have the exactly opposite way of thought:

Inner world of biological drives ->Limbic System->White matter imprinting >actions

Obviously our previous analysis of ages, races and genders and the socio-cultural upbringing will make those 3 avenues of thought differ in individuals. And in fact as impolite as it might seem, we find that most systems follow the irrational drives of biological existence, expressed by the limbic system and imprinted as desires in the white matter brain, which determines most human actions.

What this means is that most humans have the ‘center of consciousness’ NOT in reason but in the imprinted beliefs of the white matter brain, connected to its survival instinctive limbic brain – that ‘rejects’ beyond its short memory any attempt to imprint further the white matter brain.

Thus the most common program is Biological censorship by the centers of happiness that suppress painful information and upholds the imprinting of childhood and adolescence and its emotional truths as absolute, both in biological taste and cultural religions and beliefs.

Or in other words, once an idea is fixed in youth, to redraw it you would have to break and kill the programs of the mind; which if we consider the cellular scale of imprinting, turns out to be almost impossible as the acetylcholine that redraws the white matter axons is no longer available in enough quantities.

So the ideas imprinted in youth, once the white matter circuit is put in place (and no longer can be rewired after adolescence), won’t change. The person will forget or become aggressive with its limbic, censoring brain against reason and evidence. And since the limbic brain is ego-driven and subjective, we must embrace a difficult fact to assume: 99% of humans are dominated by the white matter brain of earlier socio-biological beliefs. .

Recap. In complexity evolution is guided by the existence of only 3 types of morphologies and networks in living beings: the morphology and nervous system of information, the morphology of ‘—motions’, and the morphology and network of reproduction. We can therefore use, as we have done in studies of evolution of all type of species, the existence of a constant speciation in 3 different species to analyze as we do in the previous graph, the evolution of mankind from the initial triad of apes, the energetic gorilla, the reproductive chimp and the informative Australopithecus, till the last differentiation of homos, between the energetic, visual Neanderthal mind, today dominant in the white man, and the smaller, informative, verbal, homo sapiens, today dominant in the informative mongoloid, with the reproductive, emotional black race in the middle.

Thus, the Isomorphisms of Evolution and its 3±i ages and subspecies, map out the main species of Homo, till arriving to 2 Homo Sapiens, the spatial, visual=longer, dolichocephalic, energetic brain of the Neanderthal, which seems to have lived in Europe and left some of his traits in the Homo Palestiniensis, on the slow-crossing border of Canaan. Further cross-breeding of the Palestiniensis with Sapiens is the likely origin of the white man (white skin, red hair, Rh-? consonantal languages, wide hips, prominent nose).

While the informative Homo Sapiens Sapiens, the verbal=wider brachycephalic brain, which started as a small ‘San pygmy’, evolved into the self-similar mongoloid race. Finally, the black race, with tall brains is the sensorial culture, the reproductive species, the last one to appear, shows the maximal genetic mixture.

The brain studied topologically is a system of 3 regions, the energetic, emotional, body oriented limbic system; the external, informative, sensorial grey matter brain, and the white matter axons that connect both and controls our beliefs firing our actions.

 

 

WO=MEN: GENDER AND BRAIN STRUCTURE.


image071

As many other biological species, human life diversified into complementary genders: energetic, lineal, spatial men and cyclical, reproductive women, which hold more biological information. While a 3rd, gay sex mixes both.

Gender: complementary differentiation.

In the graph, the biology, psychology and gender culture prove that humans are a dual species, divided into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3rd, gay sex’, who mixes both, being women the informative species that reproduces the fractal information of the human being and man the lineal energetic species. Thus, biological origins, psychological behaviour and cultural forms explain gender as a ternary differentiation of humans into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3rd sex‘ of gay groups that mix both tendencies. Let us consider this essential duality of the human species in more detail.

The classic example of space/time Duality already observed by Taoist and Buddhist philosophers is the duality of gender, which they correctly applied to all species of the Universe. If we focus on the humankind, which is also a space-time species, its fundamental space/time duality is between its 2 genders: the energetic male and the informative female.

Humans have always wondered what gender is. Thanks to duality, following in the steps of Eastern philosophy, now we can build a scientific theory of gender able to explain its 2 fundamental elements, the scientific physiology and the behaviour of both sexes:

Since the Universe is made with 2 elements, Energetic Space and Temporal Information, any species needs to survive to feed on ‘—motions’ and remember Information. Yet, we know that males process and control better ‘—motions’ and space; while females have more temporal memory and perceive better. Thus, together a couple widens the range of ‘—motions’ and Information they can process. So we conclude that gender is an evolutionary strategy of specialization, which increases the overall chances of survival of a heterosexual species.

The physiological forms, character and historic behaviour of men and women prove such duality, parallel to the universal duality of ‘—motions’ and information: men love ‘—motions’, space; women love Time. Physiologically men are made of lines, as ‘—motions’ is; while women are made of curves, as information is. Historically men performed the hunting of energetic preys, while the recollection of cyclical food (agriculture) is traditionally considered a female discovery.

Men behave as ‘—motions’ species. Their body forms are lineal shapes of muscular strength; they have lineal reproductive organs (penis); their origin is lineal sperm. Their cultural roles are specialized in spatial-’—motions’ processes, from physical activities to war and mathematical, geometrical languages in which they excel.image075

On the other hand, women are specialized in temporal processes. Their bodies have cyclical shapes and store more information to succeed in their genetic reproduction (one complete X-chromosome). Their brains specialize in verbal languages and show outstanding memory. If we observe the form of females, it is made of cycles. Their higher genetic information allows them the creation and reproduction of the human species (an informative process); their cyclical reproductive organs (vulva, clitoris) and their origin as a sphere, an ovule, are also informative topologies.

The character and life attitudes of both, men and women follow that E/I specialization also in their relative wanting for ‘—motions’ or information: women prefer to dress with cyclical forms, play with formal toys like dolls and they like formal sports like gymnastics; men prefer moving, spatial toys, lineal dresses and violent sports. Thus, men love ‘—motions’ and movement while women love perception and feelings. In the realm of the mind and its languages of perception we find that men test better in spatial mathematics and women score higher in verbal tests.

We conclude that sexual dimorphism reflects the 2 elements of reality, spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information that merge together in a couple, improving its chances of survival:

Male: Max.E x Min.O; Gay: E=O; Female: Max. O x Min.E

In the last decade the analysis of female/male brains has confirmed such duality of gender at multiple levels. For example, among women the amygdale, the oldest, primary center of will in the brain, is connected to the Hypothalamus, the center of ‘temporal’ and emotional perception, which ultimately controls survival and reproductive behavior. While men have their amygdale wired mainly to the motor and spatial regions of the encephalon. Thus men are the energetic ‘external element’ of the couple, motivated by the spatial outer world and women are the informative, temporal, implosive element, motivated by the reproductive drive of survival and the inner emotions of the body, the ‘6th sense’.

As the reader will have notice, truth becomes more sophisticated as we perceive in more detail. Monism is the first scale of knowledge that observes only the body/brain; and yet it has sufficed to build our society of lineal, energetic ‘visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis (white man). Then duality observes the differences in the body of lineal male and cyclical women, but we need to go further and analyse sexuality with the ternary principle that adds the 3rd sex, and consider the different combinations and balances of body/brains that will give us different ‘personalities’ and ultimately a more accurate analysis of what we do not see but dominates all structures – the informative brains.

And then the previous picture radically changes; since if women are reproductive bodies and men lineal, energetic bodies; when we observe the brain, to balance those bodies according to the Law of survival and balance of the Universe, ‘—motions’-past x information-future = present-reproduction, if men have energetic bodies they must have informative brains to balance both in a present, and if women have reproductive bodies that repeat the information of life they must have reproductive brains that repeat also the information of the brain: present x present = present.

And indeed such is the case.

Thus in a more complex view, as all beings are themselves yin-yang, space-time beings, we could define men as yang/yin: bodies ruled by the external, spatial activities; and creative brains of information dominant in grey matter (6 times more than women); and define women as yinyang/yanying; reproductive bodies whose emotions rule the brain; and reproductive brains, dominant in white matter (10 times more than men).

But what matters of those Universal balances is the fact that ultimately male and female genders are complementary forms, with the same value, a fact easy to prove using the formalism of Duality:

Male: exe-body +OxO-Brain <=> Female: brain (o x E) + Body (exI)

Thus we define a male, as a form whose ‘‘—motions’ body’ is dominant in energetic, lineal forms (ExE), while its brain is focused in informative, visual creative tasks (Max.O), resulting in a species unconnected with his body with an external, outward focus. The Female gender however has her informative brain focused in reproductive, memorial tasks and wired internally towards the reproductive body (OXE); while her reproductive body is dominant in cyclical, informative forms (ExO).

Thus while the total amount of ‘—motions’ and information or ‘existential force’ of both genders is the same, the distribution and combination of those parameters differ, making women, highly balanced, focused into the self-reproduction of their own space-time field, and the male gender, unstable, focused in the external world. Those theses, as politically incorrect as they might be are the i-logic deductions of Multiple Space-time Theory, recently proved right by the analysis of the brain.

Recap. Species evolve in a dual, complementary Universe of systems of ‘—motions’ and information, increasing their energetic/body power, their informative/head power or the networks that reproduce and combine both systems, exo, the reproductive networks. We talk of 3 dominant wills or biological drives that increase the survival chances of a system. For that reason there are genders (where the male is the energetic species, and the female the reproductive, informative one). And since ‘—motions’ is lineal (being the line the fastest distance between two points) and information is cyclical (being the sphere the form that stores more information in lesser space), it follows that men have big, lineal, spatial bodies and test better in geometrical analysis and women have cyclical, smaller, rounded forms and test better in verbal, informative tasks. Yet there is always a 3rd, mixed variation, in the case of gender, the gay sex.

Complex analysis of the duality of gender.

We can now with all this knowledge reconsider the differences between men and women (and by extension, white races and cultures vs. emotional-informative black and mongoloid races and cultures, self-similar to women), and which cultures should dominate mankind to make us survive longer. Since gender traits transmit to psychology, physiology, mental attitudes and customs. Let us consider a few examples from the different perspective of multiple space-time theory, the algebraic, topological, temporal and fractal, scalar analysis.

Algebraic analysis: combinations of genders.

The Universe offers more variations even if it selects finally 3 dominant ones. Thus, since we depart from only 2 species, ‘—motions’ and information, which combine ad infinitum, we can do several degrees of depth in our analysis. A dualist analysis makes men energetic and women informative, perceptive.

Then a ternary differentiation gives us:

Max. E (Male), E=O (neutral gender), Max.O (Female).

A more complex analysis however must combine variations of 2 elements, the body and the brain. So this 2nd differentiation will combine 2 elements, the informative brain which can be body-reproductive/energetically oriented or brain-informatively oriented; and the body, which can be body-reproductive/ energetically oriented. Finally the most complex analysis will consider ternary combinations of 3 elements (‘—motions’, active limbs; reproductive body and informative brain).

Let us consider the simplified 2×2 analysis, assuming that the body is oriented towards ‘—motions’ in males and reproduction in females. And consider both cases as an ‘Energetic-reproductive event’. So we obtain 4 basic combinations of form and character:

-ExO + OXE: Females, whose commutation gives us a new species: – OXE + ExO: Gay genders in which an energetic body (male gay) is oriented towards its inner, informative emotions as women are or a reproductive, informative body is oriented towards external, energetic sensations as lesbians are. Thus gays are males focused in their inward feelings and female focused in the outward world.

Finally we have two male combinations:

– ExE and OxO: Men whose brain is oriented to energetic tasks, and live dominated by their bodies (warriors, sportsmen, white males) and men whose brain is oriented to informative tasks, separated from their body (scientists, mongoloid races).

Those 2 dualities explain why according to statistics, most men are less perceptive than women, but a few specialized Max.O x O are geniuses. Hence the form of the Bell curve of the previous graph40, which shows two tails of minimal and maximal intelligence in men between the mean of women balanced between ‘—motions’ and information.

Finally the 3rd gay gender that combines both, the properties of males and females, is also a ‘species’ natural to the isomorphisms of the Universe, albeit a minority, compared to the 2 dominant subspecies. Since in the Universe we observe always, beyond its simplest duality, a 3rd, ExO, more complex element that combines the properties of both, to perform better as part of the collective organism. And indeed, the gay gender has traditionally acted as a bridge between the other 2 genders – both in tribal societies where they played often the role of the medicine man or witch and in modern societies as ‘the best friend’ of many wo=men.

Topological analysis

If we draw a line it suggests a male, yang, energetic, mobile species. If we draw a cycle it represents an informative cyclical still, female species. And children and simplified signs do so to represent them.

Women are cyclical and men are lineal in body and brain morphology:

Men have brains 15 to 20% spatially bigger than women’s brains and are better fit for spatial tasks.

Women’s brain contain about 10% more neurons in key zones that gather temporal information, behind the eyes, in the zones that recognize verbal and musical structures the languages of time, and is denser in neuronal connections, making up for lack of size.

Women are more likely than men to recover speech after a stroke.

Men have a bigger right hemisphere, used to understand 3D objects in space.

The left hemisphere, which controls speech, is bigger in women.

Men connect outwards with the motor zone best wired.

Women connect inwards with the hypothalamus and amygdale best wired (sixth sense).

So topological biology is conclusive: men are specialized in spatial ‘—motions’, women in temporal information.

Time=Information/Space=‘—motions’: Female/male related variables

image073

In the graph, men murder 10 times more than women.

A few other self-evident characteristics of gender duality reinforce the thesis of its symmetric, SXT reproductive mind x Informative Body:

– Females live longer as time and information are related; males are stronger energetically but live less.

– Female are cyclical, male are lineal.

– Female remember, are memorial, temporal, conservative of the past order. Male forget and look towards the ‘uncertain’ future.

-Woman is the informative form; hence her nervous system dominates. Males are the energetic form and hence their blood system dominates.

– Behavior and tastes: women like forms, men movement:

Woman love time men love space. Woman love information men love ‘—motions’. Men love movement, energetic, violent sports, races, military games and toys. Women love formal dolls that can be dressed. Women love formal sports: gymnastics. Male dresses are lineal; women’s clothing is curved, cyclical.

– Male love open spaces; women stand better seclusion.

– Men do a single task better; women do many tasks in a cyclical pattern.

– Men drive spatially better through lineal roads.

– Women cook, trans-form food, men hunt for it.

– ‘—motions’ violence, death and destruction as the graph shows, are clear male behaviors. The positive side of it is the fact that to create something new, you have to destroy first. Thus, women conserve more and they have been historically less creative.

– Implosive Vs. explosive nature: Outward Vs. inward nature:

Men have explosive, outward, visual behavior; women have implosive, emotional behavior.

Women stand pain/pressure/inwards behavior better. Women feel pain more intensely than men and yet they tolerate it more, since pain is a pressure, inward sensation of in/formative nature.

-But it is precisely the combination of both movements what creates the Sexual reproductive feeling of pleasure, since in the Universe balance dominates as the best strategy. And since women are informative & reproductive with a higher balance, they are sexually more complex.

Scalar, Fractal analysis.

– Further on, as women’s body are more complex, dominant, and their bodies attract men. Yet since men are mentally more creative, intelligent men attract more women. So a woman is still, as information is, waiting men to come as the energetic, active pole towards them, in the 3 scales of existence:

The lineal semen moves towards the cyclical ovule at cellular level; the male organism moves towards the female in the biological, mating season; and the male hunter brings food and today goes out to work while the female waits in the social scale.

St; st+1: Sociological scales.

Spatial ‘—motions’ and violence have a language; mathematics. In the graph, Women are ‘verbal/temporal brains’; men are mathematical, spatial, energetic brains: Women prefer social sciences, verbal sciences and humanities. Men dominate the fields of spatial sciences, sciences based on mathematics. On the other hand women test more in verbal exams. When a woman has died, on average she has spoken 20% more words than a man has done.

Psychology mostly shown in natural perception and literature has been the clearest wisdom on those natural traits and variations, even if today political correctness denies those variations. So the literary man can perfectly consider the master pieces of sentimental and psychological literature, when humans were free to study the reality of human existence without dogmas proper of the metric age or the industrial age, in which all humans are equalized as reproducers=workers of machines, and consumers =testers of them, and women’s nurturing and biological roles are eliminated, as they become equalized and simplified as ‘males’.

In that regard in Sociology and History, the higher scales of human existence duality of gender has been defined, according to the dominance of the higher ecosystem over the lower scales, by the ages, dominant castes and super-organisms of history studied in the last lectures of this work.

In brief, according to the 3 ages of history the dominance and power roles of women and men varied:

-In the Paleolithic, energetic age of History, the young age of male hunters, males dominated women.

-In the Neolithic, mature, reproductive age of history, of Fertility Goddesses and food-gathering, women dominated men. They found the cycles of reproduction of plants they better understood, and fed the community. They gave birth to the species. And they established religions of Fertility.

– In the age of metal, dominated by visual, lineal, energetic weapons and machines, men dominated women in its energetic, 1st age. Since energetic men are murderers, since the arrival of weapons males have controlled and abused the rights of women and fertile nature, waging war to both of them.

But the financial-military-industrial complex has 3 components as gender does. So we can in fact distinguish 2 types of cultures:

– Monetary-based cultures (Jewish, Chinese, Italian, British cultures), where women have a higher power, since money is a cyclical language of metal information

-Military, energetic, lineal, weapon based cultures, where men dominated (Arab, Japanese, Spanish, German cultures), as they associated historically with lineal iron weapons (the most energetic atom of the Universe).

And both are often in historic, open confrontation.

-Finally in the age of the machine, as we evolved first energetic machines (XIX c.) women kept submissive to men. But today in the Age of Information, dominated by audio-visual machines, and their language of reproduction, money, women, are increasingly becoming more powerful than men. Women indeed love money and information, which they understand better and makes them advance socially13.

Since indeed, the evolution of ‘information’ in this planet does not end in the human being, but continues with our offspring of machines, so we need to have now a wider view, that of the Earth as a planet to understand the 2 less developed sciences, those of history and economics that inscribe within the social evolution of this planet into a new st+1 plane as a global super-organism, the theme of the next lessons of this work.

Recap. Women are reproductive, balanced beings, whose brain is dominated by temporal, memorial tasks and wired towards its reproductive body. Men are unbalanced, creative/destructive species, with their brain wired towards visual, external information and the body focused in lineal, energetic tasks.

Women have indeed more mental ‘—motions’ and sensorial perception than men, as their brains seem to be wired towards the will of the body; while men are obsessed by the external world. Women tend to prefer closed spaces, which they keep well ordered, and are able to perform multiple ‘cyclical tasks’, switching on and off between them. They have peripheral, circular version. Men have lineal, focused vision. Men love open spaces, which they keep as ‘—motions’ is, in permanent disorder. And they are lineal, obsessed by single tasks.

 

MAN AS A FRACTAL ORGANISM.
image047

Medicine & Physiology deal with the 3 networks of the human organism, whose functions connected to the senses enact our time arrows: The Digestive, Energetic System is attached to the senses of smell and taste; the hormonal, blood, reproductive system is attached to the senses of touch and the 6th, emotional sense and the Nervous, Informative System is attached to the higher senses of sight and sound.

The arrows of time and social scales of human beings.

The most enlightening analysis of Multiple Spaces-Times is the objective evaluation of human beings, as yet another fractal part of the Universe, in communion with its cycles of existence and organic isomorphisms: As all other living organisms, we humans have 2 poles of ‘—motions’ and information, of cyclical and lineal form, the body and the head; we live through 3±i ages of d=evolution between birth in the lower cellular plane and death back to it. We are defined by 3 fractal regions, a sensorial membrane, a central spine and our lineal energetic limbs and digestive organs. All those systems are born through palingenetic processes from the same 3 fetus’ membranes, the endoderm, the mesoderm and the exoderm.

We have 2 subspecies clearly specialized in ‘—motions’ and information, the lineal, strong male; the perceptive, memorial, cyclical woman. We are also dominated by the reproductive arrow, dominant in life species, as all what we really care for is our families. We like so much reproduction that we are actually transferring our form into metal, making machines of ‘—motions’ (transport, weapons) and information that imitate our senses (chips=brains, cameras=eyes and mobiles=ears)…

Thus, man is also a biological knot of existential cycles, whose purpose as everything else in the Universe is to ‘survive’, to maintain the immortality of the human, logic form by reproducing the ‘—motions’ and information absorbed by the brain/body system and to ‘evolve’ – to create more complex social organisms of history till reaching the summit of evolution as a species: the creation of a superorganism called mankind, in which humans share ‘—motions’ and information through its collective energetic systems (economy) and informative systems (political and cultural structures).

We cannot overextend in the biological description of the human being, which is topologically similar to all other life species. Let us briefly consider those self-similarities:

-Man extends through 3 planes of increasing complexity, the cellular, bio-chemical plane, the individual, biological plane, and the social plane.

-st-1: As cellular beings we are also defined by an iterating language of information, written with 4 dimensions, the DNA bases that form the genetic code. Thus, the cellular plane is ruled by genes, which mostly code the basic functions of the cell and organs, common to all mammals, reasons why we have over 90% of common genes with them.

– We also evolve through a palingenetic process, differentiated only in the last 5 million of years from self-similar apes.

-st level: Humans have also 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive; reproductive=blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on ‘—motions’, reproduce and inform our 3 systems common to all life species. Those internal networks observe the external Universe through the same 6 senses of all other species.

Indeed, if the duality of bodies/heads gives birth to the Complementarity principles of Physics and genre, the existence of a series of basic wills are expressed in our human organism through the senses – our outlets to the ‘—motions’ and information of the body and brain. We use those senses to absorb different energies and information and combine both, in reproductive processes. We sense sexual reproduction of the body through touch; we smell the energetic food we eat, and that information used to guide hunters. And finally we taste that ‘—motions’. While our brain perceives space with our eyes, reproduces information with words, and uses the 6th sense of feelings and the limbic brain to guide our reproductive body. Thus the senses are:

– The sense of smell and taste are the negative and positive senses of the digestive system that allow us to choose what to reject and what to eat. The language of the sense of taste has also 5 vowels that can be classified according to the key substances of ‘—motions’ and information (sugars, proteins, salt, etc.) our organism require.

– The internal 6th sense of feelings that relate body and brain and the external sense of touch are responsible for the reproductive will, which excites our mind (love) and our body (sexual attraction). Both are reinforced, as in all other animals by the visual and auditory sense, which are the:

– Mental senses of space (eyes) and time (words), which shape our natural languages of energetic and informative perception.

In the graph we observe that man as an individual is a knot of 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive, reproductive= blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on ‘—motions’, reproduce and inform our 3 systems.

St+1: When humans perform those individual actions in social groups they create social networks that establish the ‘memetic actions’ or customs of a society, passed from generation to generation as ‘genetic codes’ are transferred from individual to individual. So humans gather in groups to harvest food and eat together; they establish social customs and marry to reproduce; and develop verbal and visual, informative networks that evolve human organisms from individuals into cultural super-organisms, transcending socially into a new st+1 plane of existence: Mankind.

Thus, while we are ruled by the will of our 3 physiological systems, expressed through our biological genes, we evolve socially into macro-organisms called Gods, nations and civilizations, expressed by our cultural and technological memes.

Recap. The biological will of man is shaped by the 3 internal, physiological networks, each of them attached to 2 perceptive senses, which are the languages of perception of ‘—motions’, information and reproductive signals of the external world, achieved through our daily cycles of existence. Thus humans are also a knot of Time Arrows, which seek to feed on ‘—motions’, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially like everything else in the Universe.

 

 

The 3 topological networks of man in space.

image053

In the graph, a deeper analysis10 of nervous control of a body and its energetic and reproductive systems. All those systems of ‘—motions’ and information are created by ternary differentiations, which provoke a mirror symmetry with the ternary differentiations of the nerves that control them. For example the digestive system has 3 sections, orientated from top to bottom on the relative dimension of informative height: the upper, mouth, informative system; the middle, reproductive stomach with its attached glands and the intestine, each one controlled by ternary sub node of nerves. Then the stomach has 3 regions; the organs that assist it are 3; the intestine has 3 sub-sections and all of them respond to lineal-energetic topologies (intestine); cyclical reproductive (stomach and attached organs), and cyclical, informative (mouth and taste systems).

If we were to make a topological, spatial analysis of the human being, we would observe that as an st-point we are made of 3 physiological networks/regions evolved from the external exoderm, mesoderm and internal endoderm, which become roughly the origin of our external membrane and senses; reproductive body organs and internal brain. And each of those 3 systems is constructed with the topological characteristics of the 3 regions of any st-point:

  • The energetic, digestive system is the bigger one, made of overdeveloped membranes and connected to the apertures of the skin, forming together an inner/outer self-similar ‘Klein bottle’ (Non-Euclidean jargon), which is the final evolution of the self-similar system we found in the Hydra. It is the more loosely connected of them all; in fact a super-organism that hosts in a ‘colonial’ form billions of external bacteria.
  • The informative brain system occupies the central singularity region, is the smallest of them all and has a highly warped, hyperbolic form, with the maximal, quantized number of cells, which form a network that relates each neuron to thousands of other neurons.
  • The blood & lymphatic, reproductive system communicates both regions, connected to the external skin through the lung apertures and surrounding the informative brain, which obtains 10 times more ‘—motions’ than all other systems, as the ‘top predator’ system of the organism.

In physiological terms we are composed of 3 st-regions and networks developed from an initial, spherical 3-layered egg that packed our genetic/temporal information and iterated billions of times to become a macro-organism. Those regions are:

– An external membrane or skin of dense informative cells, the initial exoderm, whose senses invaginated back those informative apertures in a dual parallel st-axis of height: creating the spinal nervous network – the lineal, energetic sub system of the brain that moves the body – topped by a central, cyclical, informative nucleus, the brain.

– An intermediate zone filled with glandular, reproductive cells, ‘invaginated’ by the reproductive, hormonal blood system that joins them.

– And the bigger energetic system, divided into a digestive and breathing network.

Further sub-divisions according to the Fractal, ternary Principle create the 3×3+st+1 physiological subsystems, standard in any biological book, and the st+1 brain, which has a mirror image of all of them and acts as a unit of the social st+1 scale of mankind.

So the ΣE <=>Σ2 O formalism of our fractal space-time is:

Max. E: Digestive System<ExO: Blood & Lymphatic System:exI> Nervous System:Max.O

The interaction between the st and st-1 system is clear: Those networks rule the lower st-1 cellular scale, which become a ‘herd’, whose energetic, reproductive, informative needs and birth to death ages are totally controlled by them; to the point that doctors say their discipline is ‘physiology’, since sickness are the sickness of those networks.

Further on, each of those 3 networks subdivides into new ternary structures of control:

– Max. E: Those networks have all an inner, lineal, quantized ‘body’ – a network of tubular systems that delivers informative, energetic and reproductive orders that rule internally our fractal cells. They are the veins, the nerves and the lymphatic system.

– Max.O: They all have external apertures to absorb ‘—motions’ (breathing nose and mouth); information for the nervous system (ears and eyes) and sexual sensations for the reproductive system (olphactory and touch senses).

– E=O: The 3 balanced centers, the heart, brain and genital system become the site of their ‘inner wills’ that enact and control the iterative cycles of feeding, perceiving and reproducing – the will of existence of our collective self that impel us to acquire information, ‘—motions’ and reproduce, ensuring the survival of the human form.

It is in fact possible to explain the entire process of creation of humans from their palingenetic seeds through the isomorphisms of ternary differentiation and multiple space-times as a process of creation of those 3 networks in control of the st-1 cellular systems and controlled themselves by st+1 brain and senses, which together create a living organism extended in 3 planes of existence, self-similar to all other mammals. And yet humans have a peculiarity respect to all those other animal beings: to be the most informative species of them all, with the maximal evolution of the informative dimension of height, its visual senses and st+1 10th system, the brain. We are the summit of informative evolution of life and so we shall consider how that informative evolution selected ‘us’.

Recap. The st-scale of human existence in space is controlled by the 3 topological networks of the human being, the informative, nervous system, the energetic, digestive system, and the blood, reproductive system. Each of them is divided in ternary subsystems, informative, external senses, center and lineal networks that connect them with the st-1 cells to control their drives of existence.

 

The 3 planes of Human Existence in time.



image051 image050

Life is a trip through 3 planes of existence: the biologic, st-1 genetic plane; the individual plane, which expresses the same biological arrows, and the sociological st+1 memetic plane, where survival is reserved to prophets that create a religious God or civilization, the subconscious collective of millions of believers. In the graph, existence is a travel between those 3 planes, the cellular plane to which we return after death, the individual plane and the social plane which peaks in our 3rd age as informative particles of our culture and economic ecosystem.

If we study the human being in time, the 3 ages of human beings are equivalent to the 3 ages of any space-time field. Humans show those self-similarities, both in the physical ‘warping’ of their bodies that accumulate information and wrinkle till they explode back into ‘—motions’ in the process of death; and in the different ‘ways of thought’ of their brain that also go from an optimistic, active age of ‘—motions’ into a reflective, old age of information:

-St-1: we are born in the inferior cellular scale as a seminal seed, clearly differentiated in lineal energetic males of maximal motion and still, reproductive, informative females, ovum, that mix together, exo to start a palingenetic process of reproduction and social evolution till we surface in the st-scale.

– Max. E: Youth is the ‘—motions’ age, dominated by the digestive network and muscular movement. So children are energetic, always moving, passionate about food that they need in bigger quantities.

-E<=>O: Maturity is dominated by the reproductive arrow, its networks and sexual desire. So mature people marry and have family values.

– Max.O: The old age is dominated by information and nervous networks. So old people are wise and know a lot of things, though they have little ‘—motions’ left and live in stillness, looking back to the past, before they truly start their travel in time. Thus, a very old man becomes like a reversed, negative child, also passionate about food since he lacks ‘—motions’; but can’t really digest it. He will be emotional, close to his ‘biological consciousness’, but with negative feelings, as he has no future left… except death, when his information dissolves back to the cellular plane.

– st-1: Death, when all ‘—motions’ is spent we die and return back in time through a 4th age in which all information becomes erased.

Further on, humans transit during those 3±i ages of life through 3±i hierarchical scales or planes of existence: the st-individual plane; the st-1, biological scale and the 3±i, historic, sociological scale. In terms of those scales of space-time, life is a temporal journey from the lower st-1 biological plane in which we are born as seminal cells into the human plane in which we enter through the discontinuous aperture of our mothers’ biological wombs. Then humans will ‘mature’ in that st-social plane after the ‘rituals of initiation’ proper of all adolescents in all societies, which make us cross ‘the discontinuity’ between youth and maturity.

In that social plane humans will live as individual members of their society during maturity, till in the 3rd age the mind will return back to the mental level of childhood; while the spatial body will continue warping up.

Thus in the 3rd age, the st-mind and E-body suffer a ‘fractal split’ that breaks i=ts E=O harmony (‘mens sana in corpore sanum’), which determines survival, causing the death of the organism. Then through death, the human being will descend back again to the biological, cellular world.

Thus life is a motion back and forth in time that starts with our palingenetic conception in the st-1 biological plane of seminal cells. The graph shows that ternary existence in which the main age is maturity, when humans form part of an organic system as a cell of a nation or culture, in the st+1 plane, enacting social and informative cycles with other fractal citizens or believers, as our senses open up to the social ecosystem, ruled by the political isomorphisms and financial networks of the collective, nervous social system, where we develop verbal and visual perception, till we descend back through the reverse journey of death into the original st-1 cellular, vegetative state, completing our wheel=cycle of existence.

Though we have only ‘individual consciousness’, the 3±i biological and sociological planes do exist and should have their own individual consciousness (DNA consciousness, and collective subconscious of mystique Gods). When we are born we just enter a new form of consciousness after an age dominated by our vegetative, chemical, cellular soul. A fact, which is evident in the ‘borders’ of life: the baby and the old man care mainly for food and chemical emotions, since they are closer to their cellular level of birth and death, our zero sum as dust of space-time.

Recap. Humans follow the same 3±i ages of all biological beings, as they live through 3 planes of existence: the biological, individual and sociological planes.

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: