Home » ·4csms » Worldcycle: ¬big bang

Worldcycle: ¬big bang

±∞ ¬∆@ST:

Advertisements

SUMMARY

Foreword: Organic, fractal Universe vs. big bang.

I. Big bang as pseudoscience.

II. 5D model: relational space-time organisms.

III. Cosmology: the galatom and its Forces

IV. Experimental falsehood of the big bang.

V. Worldcycles vs. Worldlines: the mathematical formalism.

ABSTRACT  

This post is complementary to the post on cosmos, which are much better understood as wholes, due to the maximal information we obtain from it, as opposed to the Universe as a whole, of which regardless of hyperbolic astronomy (big-bang pretentious theories of the whole, obtained from a simple lineal equation, ‘stressed and stretched’ to infinity – Vhod…the ‘God’ of creationist astronomers:), we know very little. 

Thus in this post we Do concentrate on the ¬big-bang, that is the fact that the big-bang theory of an æntropic Universe, which ignores the fractal structure of its scales, the cyclical nature of time, and the in-formative gravitational forces that collapse expansive dark energy into mass, inside galaxies, balancing its expansion, is NOT real, but a mathematical entelechy, based in reductionist limits to the information handled by those equations.

We do NOT know what the hyper-universe which seems to be similar to a world of ‘anti-atoms’ (as galaxies have similar parameters to those of atoms but with most of its mass in the halo, as anti atoms do). So in the scales of big-bangs we know,  only the alternative cyclical big-bang/big crunch time cycles of quasar galaxies, similar to beta decays with a 20 billion years rhythm, seems to be real (mathematically modeled decades ago by Fred Hoyle).

I. big-bang as death of a physical St≈ðƒ organism.

Let us then study reality merely as it seems – born out of a series of beta-decays, that is local big-bangs of galactic neutrons, and use T.Œ in 5D for what is worth – to compare the processes of the different organic scales of matter, and the first thing we must explain is the dual nature of a big-bang as an entropic death which ‘kills a present’ system and breaks its Sp ≈ Tƒ harmony, into a dual big bang.

And so we have said and will keep saying a lot of this phase, since HERE IS WHERE THE REAL BIG-BANG STARTS, IN THE DUAL DEATH OF THE BLACK HOLE:

 

 

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 20.41.36

When physical systems, masses or charges on the atomic or cosmological level, die, their Sp x Tƒ elements split, as in all processes of death (separation of ‘head and body’ in life organisms): their temporal, gravitational or electromagnetic central knot of information jets out in the dimension of height and their intermediate space expands into a membrane of spatial radiation. In the big bang a hyper-black hole exploded and its Entropy gave birth to our Universe.

Stars produce big-bangs that show clearly the breaking apart of its informative/energetic regions: a flat toroid expands most of the mass of its toroid, reproductive inner region and a perpendicular, magnetic jet (right side) expels its central superfluid, informative zone. While in atomic, smaller worlds, charges transform its information into a bidimensional plane of light-space, c2, in a process defined by Einstein’s equation: E=Mc2.

The gravitational faster than light big bang resolves the mystery of the inflationary age, now canonical in cosmology. Moreover it follows the general isomorphisms of ‘death processes’ of multiple spaces and times theory. Since death is the most expansive, spatial process of erasing of information, Max. Sp=Min.Tƒ, it happens in a relative zero time – the minimal time of the system, when information dies and expands into a relative bidimensional sheet of space.

So we die in a second, our time clock that is the minimal unit of time of the human being (thought, blink of the eye, heart beat) and suddenly we become a ‘relative flat’ surface of Entropy (corpse, extended into a flat space). So it does the gravitational Universe, whose death happens in the tick of Planck’s time, the minimal action/vibrational time of its string units.

Indeed, death is anti-symmetric to life, an arrow that has no intermediate states and lasts minimal time: a transformation of information into Entropy happens in the relative zero time of each scale: from novae to atomic bombs, to universes, to human death.

Further on, since a vortex of physical, gravitational time is paradoxically faster, more massive, informative, the smaller it is, the faster gravitational big bang started in the smallish vortex of mass-time, the Planck mass/density/time-tick, he aptly called the ‘numbers of God’; since it was the hyper-black hole ‘brain’ of the previous organic Universe, whose reproductive radiation gave birth to our huge Universe. Only the inverted properties of time and space, information and Entropy, explain it.

T.Œ, theoretically has no limit on the fastest possible time clocks of information and smallest space-times of the universe. So there might be big-bangs in all sizes and scales, yet all of them will be likely the equivalent of , the dual death of a black hole or neutron mass, splitting into a positive and negative ‘solution’ to the square function of energy of a system.

In the graph the real big-bang is dual. It is the explosion of a black hole, which is a top quark star that breaks the symmetry of its Sp and Tƒ functions, emitting its Tƒ-mass through its axis and its entropic field of radiation through its planar equator.

In this first age, the Universe or Galaxy’s black hole died in an explosion of gravitational waves (the equivalent to neutrino waves in the beta decay and nova explosion, latter considered in more detail), whose enormous energy moved forward the top quarks of the galaxy, decaying fast into strange quarks, which are the only stable heavy quarks at vacuum pressure, forming the atoms of dark matter called dibaryons (Usd-usd hexaquarks).

We are dealing here with the strongest most stable combination of quarks, as the hexagon is a perfect bidimensional pi-closed form of space, where a 3=6 radius diameter, can close completely a ‘geodesic’ elliptical halo, protecting as proteins protect the cell, the galaxy from external influences.

This is the cover of dark mater of the galaxy in perfect symmetry between its 3 families of mass and its 3 organic parts, latter studied in more detail.

For the cosmic atom it would be a much faster process, hypothesized to arise from cosmic inflation, a faster-than-light expansion just after the big Bang – only that we do NOT have the particles that could do that, because the top quark has enough job to expand a black hole with its neutrino, high energy wave and its front of fast decaying top-bottom-charm-Stable strangelet dibaryons, to the size of the galaxy.

The numbers do NOT work for further, faster, expansion. And 5D physics DO NOT speculate. It is a simple, efficient, minimalist theory of reality constructed only with available particles.

Now, we have recently discovered a ttt particle of 700 plus GB, which physicists are clueless about, ignoring what it is, but it has all the aspect of being a triplet top quark, which I prophesized 20 years ago would be the central ‘boson’ substance of the black hole, ‘gas-9’.

In this phase, the quark gluon liquid didn’t cool as physicists think (they still call it plasma 🙂 but exactly the opposite since the little-bang is the DEATH of a black hole of perfect order into entropy, so all is exactly the other way around as the experiments at CERN are constantly proving.

And so it is now when the first ± c-speed symmetry creation NOT symmetry breaking takes place, separating the interior of the galaxy-atom at < c speed, from the interior of the remaining ‘proton’-black hole, smaller than the original neutron-hyper black hole, with the strange quark halo, rotating at relative c-speed in each small strangelet vortex, acting as the protein that isolates the galaxy, and causes the ‘solidity’ of the whole galaxy which – physicists still observe with awe – does NOT work as an unconnected spiral, but thanks to that 96% of dark matter, ahs the exact rigidity of any organic solid system, from a cell to your liquid organism surrounded b a hard solid membrane-skin:

in the graph, all systems follow the same developmental ages. The explosion of the big-bang which will feed a new galaxy according to the cycle of ‘barred galaxies’ as ours, implies an inflationary age of expansion of the ‘membrane’, which through gravitational waves with a halo of strange quarks and a background of ‘neutrinos’ would fast expand the dark matter heavy membrane to the limits of the galaxy, while the slower front of electromagnetic radiation, which does not penetrate so fast, would go behind, leaving as it progresses and cools down a process of confinement of lighter quarks into hadrons and nucleons.

Ahead, the Higgs, faster than light boson (or rather ‘above’) as the explosion would split perpendicular ‘faster than like, asymmetric jets’, and planar waves of matter in different fashion, given the different polarization of neutrino waves and electromagnetic ones, would push away the remnant energy.

However cosmologists invent a…

Quark-antiquark Period?

So next, without understanding the past-future duality of quarks-antiquarks, cosmologists thought the universe, which consisted mostly of energy in the form of neutrinos and photons given the enormous energy density of the big bang of the black hole, the cosmos-galaxy would exist as a collection of quarks and antiquarks along with their exchange particles, a state which has been described as a “superhot plasma of anti-quarks and quarks, annihilating”. This time period is estimated at 10‾³² seconds to 10‾5 seconds, which would provoke through that annihilation another big bang (cosmology is full of big explosions).

Now 20 years ago, when I first copyrighted 5D physics I affirmed it would be a quark-gluon cold superfluid soup, a perfect time vortex of under zero temperature, since:

– Temperature is a measure of entropic disorder applied only to this side of the universe and to thermodynamic, molecular world.

– Inside the black hole there is a top quark star in solid or superfluid states of boson perfect form.

– The anti-quark is the death moment of the quark that last only a second and so it is not the state of the anti-atom entropic big-bang which would produce a massive wave of quarks, decaying from top into dibaryon strangelets that would form the halo.

And here is where 5d physics proved itself in 2008 when they made a perfect liquid at RHIC.

But then I sued the entre global community of physicists, because next they could provoke a strangelet ice-9 reaction and blow up the Earth. So I never was accepted in any forum of physicists again.

What happens then? A basic cycle of creation of all organic, complementary systems:

Singularity-> Big bang (death) ->Entropy Sheet->

Informative Reproduction (Big-banging of particles) ->

Social evolution (Creation of stars and galactic networks)

They are the phases of creation of the Universe. In complex models of morphogenesis, informative evolutionary phases in time alternate with reproductive radiations in space, creating a fractal rhythm of biological radiations and punctuated evolution proper of physical, biological and cultural systems:

Max. TƑ (Evolution)->Max. ST (Reproduction)->Max.Tƒ(evolution).

That rhythm applied to any system and fractal scale means that we observe the alternation of those 2 phases in any organic process of physical/biological creation, a big bang & a big banging:

-Big bangs: The singularity/seminal egg explode their energetic membrane in a micro-time period (big bang, creation of a cellular egg, etc.). Then it continues its expansion at a slower rate as it grows in complexity inwards, invaginating and creating its energetic and informative networks (invagination of dark Entropy in the Universe and electromagnetic membranes controlled by them, of the nervous system and the blood system it controls in the fetus).

-Big bangings: In the big banging phases, news informative particles/cells are evolved around those 2 forces/networks and then they start a massive age of reproduction or ‘biological radiation’.

The alternation of those two processes slowly builds a living being and a Universe masterminded by two networks around which new particles/cells and social groups of those particles/cells of increasing complexity are born.

Thus, in the inflationary Universe, explained in organic terms, a minimal, cyclical black hole vortex of the size of a string with the density of Planck and its constants of God created a first gravitational big bang, reproducing=multiplying into 1011 fractal regions of dark Entropy and quark matter in 10-43 sec.

Each gravitational bubble gave birth to a 2nd big bang of fractal beta-decays, in which nucleons expanded, dying into protons and electrons (cyclical, informative big-bang), while light-membranes of electromagnetic radiation warped the gravitational dark Entropy giving birth to an age of light.

This dual process expanded the regions of cyclical time/mass (as neutrons exploded into beta-decays) and imploded the regions of dark Entropy (as light warped the minimal information of gravitational strings), creating protons, electrons and light in 1010-11 parallel future galactic regions.

Then the process reversed as the fractal regions of mass imploded into galaxies and the dark Entropy between them tired light and expanded, but both processes remain in balance, so the present universe is in a steady, mature state without expanding or imploding when we add the implosive galactic vortices and the explosive regions between them.

The Webb telescope, by solving the relative size of the big bang and the type of hierarchical scales the organic universe displays, will determine the experimental details of those processes. If the Webb telescope observes in its 13 billion years limit a landscape of galaxies similar to the ones of our cosmic region, it means the fractal universe extends to a relative infinity; as each galaxy is self-similar to an atom of the Universal scale, whose size is astonishingly huge. Some theories hint to that concept:

– Relativists model the Universe with Einstein-Walker equations in which each galaxy is treated as a hydrogen atom. This theoretical trick that facilitates the calculus of relativity shows the self-similarity between a hydrogen atom and a Galaxy of the upper scale. Each point of the electron nebulae is a star of the upper scale. If so, each proton is a positive, central Kerr black hole. And alternatively each +Kerr black hole is a hadron made of positive top quarks. And the gravitational waves of dark Entropy expelled by black holes are equivalent to the magnetic fields of protons.

An alternative model considers that each star is self-similar to a photon, While the electron nebulae that surrounds the atom is equivalent to a nebulae of strange, quark stars, the halo of the galaxy; since strangelets are negative (strangeness is negative).

So protons are self-similar black holes (top quark stars). The halo is made of strangelet stars as the Earth will be soon (and we are indeed close to the Halo). And stars are neutral, light photons.

Cosmologists use models of electronic nebulae to describe the behavior of stars around the central black hole; and some have tried models with high-density photons.

Yet self-similarity is not identity. So what we call quantum cosmology requires a fractal formulation to make sense; NOT the use of quantum equations as if they were identical, but the logic of fractals to observe the self-similarities of those scales.

What else can we know, we human beings, dust of space-time about the infinite Universe? Not much more, because if there is a higher fractal scale and galaxies are self-similar to atoms, the extension of that scale will be so vast that we shall never find its limits. Indeed, in our Universe there are trillions of atoms and so if there are trillions of self-similar galaxies, the maximal perception we can have is that of a local structure within that Universe.

This philosophical view will be far more appealing than a mere big bang of a cellular Universe for metaphysical reasons:

– A Universe in which the two self-similar scales of quantum and cosmological vortex of space-time (charges and masses) are truly self-similar is truly infinite in space and infinite in scales of temporal information and complexity. Then we, humans are really nothing but a mush over a corner of the Universe. But in second thoughts, such structure means that we humans are also all, as each of us has infinite Universes within his self.

– While size is absolutely relative and so our position on those scales doesn’t matter, we are an incredibly complex fractal structure of Entropy and information, which in the fractal models of biology needs 10 membranes of space-time to be described. Hence, even if our size is minimal our informative complexity is astonishing; and we are from the perspective of the arrow of information, one of the supreme beings of creation.

This is not the case in a single big-bang theory where only Entropy and size matters; so we are nothing but dust of space-time.

Recap: The big bang in any scale of reality is the death of a previous physical informative knot of matter, which expands in space and then starts a creative and reproductive process or big banging.  

 The unknowns in the cosmological scale.

Now the reader will observe that we put an interrogation in all the symmetries of the cosmological scale, since contrary to belief the big-bang theory is NOT proved, likely to be only a false hypothesis, based in lineal physics, the religious power ego-trip of physicists who think they ‘know better’ and the study of their planes of the 5D are more important than those of zoologists, doctors or historians.

The contrary is truth, as the Universe is isomorphic, the scales of 5D a relative infinite and so it does not matter which scale we study, what matters is the sale we get more information from, which is the human scale – so it will give us a more complete vision of the Existential game, and the scale that a praxis makes more useful to mankind which is again the human scale.

In brief medicine not astrophysics should be the central science in a properly evolved scientific culture, base din the thorough unit of the Universe and the philosophy of science that studies it.

If there is a higher cosmological observable, the big bang in any case would be not the birth but the death of the previous Universe.

Its present description would need to be corrected to fit it nicely on a higher scale of the Universe, which will then have a non-local simultaneous ‘cellular structure’ in space, to allow for simultaneous communication of its parts with a 10c hyper gravitational force, and transversal gravitational waves, within the model of the galaxy atom.

And it will have a temporal evolution described by the epochs of the big-bang, which only will represent its entropic youth, coupled with the other 2 solutions of EFE (steady state and final big-crunch), but within a much larger time-span and size.

 

II.

UNIVERSAL WORLDCYCLES

The 3 properties of fractal space: discontinuous, bidimensional, scalar structure.

In the fractal paradigm, space is discontinuous, made of fractal non-Euclidean points, joined into bidimensional networks, through flows of expansive kinetic energy and contracting cyclical information; which grow in size and scale when we come closer to them (so points become galaxies, whose fractal points become stars, whose Non-E points become planets, whose fractal points become humans, whose Non-E points become cells, whose fractal points become atoms and so on).

So we just need to apply the ‘so obvious’ fractal, Non-Euclidean structure of reality to describe the Universe, and ‘voila!’, magic – every question is resolved, every experimental evidence fits in place. And all the whys are revealed.

Discontinuous space.

The big bang theory is based in the concept of an expansive space, merely one of the 3 possible solutions to Einstein’s field equations, which must be accepted only on that region and scale of the Universe in which space truly expands, which happens to be the interstellar space between galaxies.

But within galaxies the non-lineal, cyclical, inverse arrow of temporal information, that is the accelerated gravitational vortices of the black holes, which suck in electromagnetic entropy, converted into gravitational information, that is implode space into mass;

Thus the expansion of space between galaxies is perfectly balanced by the implosion of space curved into time vortices of mass by the galaxies. 

They balance the expansive motion of interstellar space, defining an dynamic Universe in which each scale of the fractal is in balance between its ‘expansive, entropic arrow of space and kinetic energy or lineal momentum’; (ab. $t), and its ‘implosive, informative arrow of accelerated Cyclical Time clocks, (ab. ð§).

All this said we can have a fast look at the ‘reality’ of physical time-clocks, as they are, world cycles of physical forces that increase their form, their information in pure mathematical vortex, of perfect simplicity – that is, as the 3 singularities vortices of the 3 ∆¡ scales of physical systems, masses, charges and eddies; in the microscopic scale, which become galaxies in the macrocosmic scale, related by metric equations, among which the most relevant is the unification equation of charges and masses.

To that aim we shall bring once more an image of the biggest ‘blunder’ of astrophysics as a philosophy of the Universe, precisely born of the use of a single arrow of time – entropy – the big bang ‘religious theory of creationism’ – the dogma, which no experimental evidence and sound scientific method seems able to debunk:

The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information. From this simplex but profound definition of reality as it is to the simpleton locomotions of physicists who study only a time clock (their mechanical machines uncoiled into an infinite distance) and a single space (the pegging of all the fractal spaces defined by membranes of angular momentum) and disregarding all other scales with different time-speeds according to 5D metric; there is a huge mental gap of understanding of the ‘first principles of reality’ which makes so difficult to talk to physicists on physics.
Attitude doesn’t help as the physicist believe with a religious zeal in the dogma of ‘time’ as ‘only’ the measure of ‘locomotion’ in open paths according to Galileo’s v=s/t equation, which must by decree establish the speed and lineal form of all time clocks of nature… not to speak of the ego paradox of man which blows all that regards to himself to stratospheric proportions – such is the case of Einstein’s work, merely an ad on to the v=s/t equation without radically changing its limited meaning.
Time clocks in the Universe are infinite and they have 3 forms, steady state time flows, ‘clocks properly’, which repeat their form; attractive vortices (masses, charges, eddies) which are accelerated clocks according to the general equation of all vortices, Vo x Ro = C, and expansive, entropic uncoiling scattering lineal motions such as those of big-bangs and Galilean locomotions. Regarding big-bangs though as they imply the dissolution of information back into a lower ∆-¡ scale of the fifth dimension, we must account for them as motions in the 5th dimension and classy them by I-scale in Cosmic, galactic, stellar & atomic big bangs, the ‘entropic side’ of the ‘dual generator equation’ of physical systems in terms of its 3 ages and forms, Entropy < cc-energy > Mass (E=mc2 in classic physics)

In the graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.

IN GRAPH, THE 3 singularities of the 3 ∆¡ scales of physical systems, masses, charges and eddies.

The fractal paradigm postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: E<=>Mc², which actually has 2 arrows of time, and was in fact first described as M=E/c², that is as a process to create mass from energy.

Thus both arrows balance each other and the Universe has at least 2 arrows of time, ‘Spe’ or spatial entropy, and Tƒ(m), Cyclical vortices of mass, which we can measure by the angular frequency or clock-speed of the vortex. Since indeed, E=Mc², the fundamental equation of Special relativity and E=hƒ, the fundamental equation of quantum physics, can be joined together Mc²=hƒ, whereas M= h/c² ƒ.

In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century Fractal relativity.

The smaller motions are quarks, the bigger motions are quark stars, pulsars, and black holes. Today we can model any type of vortex of space-time with fractal mathematics, as each small vortex transfers the momentum to the bigger vortex, which emerges as a macroscopic entity. Thus, we conclude that a black hole is a fractal concentration of the densest matter of the Universe, quarks, since quarks represent on average more than 99.9% of the matter of our bodies. Those improvements on the details of mass theory, based on the advancement of its mathematical tools (discovery of fractals, chaos theory, and the five postulates of non-Euclidean geometry) is the natural way in which the evolution of science happens, departing from sound logic principles.

Thus mass is proportional to a constant (h/c²) multiplied by a variable frequency and its attractive power is proportional to the speed of the vortex as a hurricane (an air vortex) or a tornado (a water vortex).  

We can therefore write a Fractal ‘Generator Equation’ of the lineal entropic space and cyclical time vortices of the cosmos:, Sp(e) <=>Tƒ(m).

In astrophysics cyclical time defines the vortices of space-time of the 3 scales, or singularity-masses (gravitational scales), thermodynamic vortices (eddies) and charges (quantum vortices), which can be unified as attractive vortices (time view) or space curvatures of the 3 scales:

In the graph two immediate consequences of the scalar, cyclical nature of space-time are the basis for the whys of astrophysics: cyclical big-bangs in all the scales of reality; and scalar disomorphisms between galaxies and atoms. Below we see how when we introduce the warping of lineal space into cyclical time, $>ð, origin of the vortices of mass, called galaxies, the (mathematical) equations of the big-bang balance.

The guidance to advance further present knowledge on cosmology thanks to the insights of 5D² comes from the symmetry between the scale of atoms and galaxies, which have in 5D metric the same structure as gravitational and quantum vortex, when we apply vortex laws (either in newtonian or Einstein’s formalism – we use here for the sake of simplicity the Newton’s vortex from where via Poisson’s potential Einstein derived his work; so NEWTON is also valid when there is no need for great accuracy).

Thus the lineal big-bang, essentially a form of pseudo-science due to the use of a single time arrow for the entire Universe, and the stubborn attempts to fit all physical phenomena on that time arrow.

A SINGLE lineal CLOCK OF TIME-locomotion ONLY FOR THE WHOLE UNIVERSE rejects the addition of the ‘real clocks of time’ of the Universe, its vortices of cosmological mass and quantum charge that ‘fold/warp’ the ‘lineal one-dimensional flat entropy between galaxies’ into 3 Dimensions?
The answer will seem an insult to cosmologists but it is what it is: as ridiculous as talking of Yhwh, the toponym for Judea in ancient Egyptian maps, hence the nation of judaism, as the creator of the Universe… And so obvious as that absurdity when you STOP beliefs and REASON, something scientists ‘think they do’ but mostly don’t:

Now for the pedantic scholar of astrophysics who thinks this is too simple, oh, yes, it is – the Universe is simple and not malicious and simplicity is genius (Einstein, Leonardo). So what ‘any scientist’ – not only physicist – tend to do to make his ‘ego shine’ is to include unneeded complications and find secondary details to ‘deny’ the obvious truths we have explained here.

 

Let us then INTRODUCE THE TWO GREAT CHANGES ON THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE: ITS 3 CO-EXISTING SCALES, 3 TOPOLOGIES AND 3-AGES IN TIME, ALL SELF-CENTERED IN THE ±MIND membrains, with its opposite tensions.

5D metric ‘generator’. Its 3 ∆±1 physical scales in time seen as  a worldcycle – no longer a worldline.

According to Klein dimension exists when we can travel through it in space and time due to the co-invariance of some space-time co-ordinates, which we can ‘match’ at each step of the journey to be in harmonic balance with the ‘co-ordinates’ of the dimension’.

In the 5th dimension the co-ordinates of space are ‘size’ (static point of view) or ‘entropy’ (dynamic point of view) and the co-ordinates of time are ‘cyclical clock speed’, the frequency, at which a cycle of space-time closes its trajectory and repeats itself. And motion is then understood as processes of growth along the coordinates of space (growth in size in a quanta of time) and along the dimensions of time (growth in speed of information or diminution) and what is more effective as it maximizes growth (max. S x T->S≈T) a balanced growth of both systems in a discontinuous beat: ∆S->∆T->∆S, which is the stop and go, motion and information, process most common to the Universe.

So another from to explain reality is to consider that all what exists are motions in the 5th dimension of fractal space-time beings.

physical scales three ages

ALL WHAT exists is a space-time super organism made of 3 topologies adjacent in simultaneous space, defined logically by a single fractal generator of those 3 only topological varieties, $p: lineal limbs/potentials/territoriesO-§ƒ: cyclical particles-heads-informative class, for all social, biological and physical systems, tracing a world cycle of 3 time ages symmetric to those 3 ∆º spatial ‘physiological/topological/social networks’ made of ∆-1 cells/citizens/matter particles,in which each of the physiological networks of the system dominates the super organism: the limbic motion/potential system dominates the first age; the re=productive body-wave systems the second age and in the third age of information the head/particle/informative people-caste dominates the physical/biological or social system, exhausting selfishly the energy of the vital body-wave, and provoking its explosion back into entropy that erases the system, completing its zero-sum world cycle, restarted if it has generated a clone super organism in its offspring, reason why the Universe is a reproductive fractal of information – only those systems that reproduce its information survive and are still with us.

In the graph we can see 3 of such scales and its relative size and speed measure in frequency (the inverse of lineal time duration: T=1/ƒ=1/ð, whereas ð is the fundamental symbols for cyclical time), a galaxy, a human and a DNA.

Those scales create in groups of 3 ∆±1 ‘universal planes’, complex organic systems, in which the faster speeds and information of smaller systems, codes larger wholes, which in turn control the motions of the smaller systems. And those are precisely the organic properties of the Universe, which extend also to physical systems.

Now we can understand better the concept of present space-time: the beat of DNA is much faster than that of the organism, in time, but its spatial size is much smaller. Yet since information is coded by the number of ‘beats’ of present of the being (bits in informative jargon, but we prefer in 5D formalism to slightly change terminology to establish the new paradigm, as all older definitions tend to be approximations to the larger concepts), if the organism was to store information it will do it in the lower scale of DNA faster coding; if the engineer wants to process information it will develop a smaller chip.

Information thus is small, and time cycles are faster. And so quantum particles, genes and memes (ideologies of the mind, often imprinted externally in objects of information, technology and culture, books, etc.) are the codifier in physical, biological and social systems of larger wholes, matter, organisms and societies.

Next we observe the interaction between cycles of time in present, and past information easily: a present timespace cycle does have both components, as it develops, the motion in time, which is made of small steps of open spatial lineal motion, till it locks in into a closed cycle. At this point the ‘memory bit’ is created. And as the Active Magnitude, or particle-point, doing the cycle establishes there a discontinuity – having created a void, feeding on the path of entropic motion it curves, this ‘remain’ of the days, will then no longer be active.

And so the space-time beat becomes an informative bit that shrinks deflated and becomes stored, as it warps in its ‘3rd old age of information’, without spatial entropy to maintain its ‘extension’. This is how the Universe works: a point of future in a ƒð-mind, in an Ä-point, which is merely the ‘shrunk mirror image’ of a mind, of a past cycle, blows up the memory into an action in space-time present, and then this action becomes a bit of information shrinking and disappearing, but perhaps remembered by the active magnitude or observed by other entity that will create an image of it and will re-enact the action.

And so this is what all is about: fractal beings tracing paths of space-time, enacted from future minds, remaining past actions, that are mirrored and repeated.

This is the conservation game of the Universe, what matters to it: to keep repeating their cycles, and then shrinking, evolving them, synchronizing them, making them act together in larger wholes. There is nothing abstract, not written in stone in those processes.

An invariance that extends to the 3 ‘co-existing scales’ of any given Universal Super-organism, synchronized in its internal and external time clocks. during its world cycle between conception and extinction.

Standard Cosmology is taught as today with only 4 dimensions, 3 of space and one of time – beyond some fringe string theories, and quantum interpretations, using infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces (De Witt-Wheeler equations).

In this landscape, space is continuous, a single flat sheet, with a very thin high dimension and 2 of length and width extended till a limit known as the cosmological horizon. On the other hand, time is lineal and finite, a single dimension both in duration, with a beginning that cuts an interval, called the ‘big-bang birth’, and different ‘theories’ about its end, which however must exist at least in a metaphysical way, because this ‘time dimension’, expands and relax space, erasing the forms of reality. So Time is not only lineal in duration but as an ‘arrow’ of devolution’, it implies an explosive, ‘entropic’, motion that increases space and diminishes form.

We shall call this ‘arrow of entropic time’ that increases space, $.

We could use the word S, which is used in physics for both space (static view) and Entropy (moving view), but as we are building a different paradigm, we need to use new symbols and as we are building a paradigm based in bidimensional ‘minimal elements’ of reality, which constantly switch state between the two ‘metaphysical properties’ of all realities, to be made of ‘formal motions’, hence of ‘form’ (still perception) and ‘motion’, we prefer to use dual Symbols. So $ stands for Spatial Extension or growing Size.

The problem with such standard cosmology is dual. On one side it does not correspond truly to experimental evidence and leaks all over the place minor errors of observation, which are rather dismissed for the sake of the theory that accepted as the scientific method obliges. The second problem is that it is too simple and so it accounts for very few facts and properties of reality, which is solved also by reducing through bulk dismissal all other properties of the cosmos and its parts, we observe and don’t fit the model. On this humans are truly skillful. And so in the same fashion religions based in completely outdated paradigms can refurbish and reborn with new myths, and dare to argue them, the standard cosmology might last forever.

Different regions of the Universe run at different speed its time clocks, and those time clocks run faster in smaller systems. We can then build a fractal dimension of relative sizes from the smallest quantum particles to the larger galaxies. Physicists have only explored this mathematical dimension in terms of size.

They have NOT matched the relationship between sizes and time clocks, which is the big ‘leap’ of knowledge require to make sense of the Universe, and its different scales, each one studied by a science. In that regard, the proper mathematical understanding of the ‘metric’ of the 5th dimension, and its application to each science – as all of them happen in ‘fractal space’ and study repetitive ‘patterns’ and events that define those ‘time cycles’ – is the biggest theoretical advance of philosophy of science in the last decades. We introduce in this section a few posts on the theme related to physics, specifically particle and cosmological physics. These posts show how ‘thought experiments’ are still the best way to advance science. They are though only the tip of an iceberg of ‘future knowledge’ to be explored by new generations of researchers.

  

III. BIG-BANG SCALES

∆±3: THE GALACTIC UNIVERSE AND ITS LIGHT SPACE-TIME MEMBRANE

So what do ‘astrophysics truly be studying’? Obviously the next duality of scales of matter in which the degree of knowledge is high by experimental evidence; the Galaxy and the atom. And the correspondence between both which in 5d metric show the same equations, as a gravitational vortex, a galaxy and an electromagnetic vortex an atom have the same 5D structure albeit with a 10 up to 40 difference of curvature-attractive power, size and speed of its time clocks.

As we will study the atom on the scales of matter, beyond the deduction of the Unification equation of charges and masses we shall study the ∆+3 galactic scale and its upper and lower elements, its ‘Universal ecosystem’ and solar cells:

  • ∆+2: Solar Systems
  • ∆+3: Galaxies
  • ∆+4: Universes.

Thus astrophysics studies for each of those ascending planes, its 5D Scalar Asymmetry, its Spatial symmetry an its Time Ages, written in the first lines of this post; where the Galaxy is the Œ-system we study, the cosmos, the unknown larger scale we hardly perceive due to the uncertainty of being inside the galaxy with minimal perception of dark energy and dark matter, whose nature we shall tackle first, and finally its ∆+2 units, stars, which, are the Human world we know better.

5D PHYSICS thus studies those scales with the linguistic isomorphic method, starting with the study of the 5D co-existing organic structure of the specific Œ, the galaxy, thus comparing it in its functions and forms to a cellular system – the most researched organic whole in human sciences.

Then once this co-existing structures are lay down with DNA black holes on the center, mitochondrial stars reproducing the substances of galaxies and halos of dark matter likely to be strangelet matter by symmetry with the 3 families of mass on the protein membrane, we can study each of the ages of evolution of the galaxy, which will be parallel to those of the cosmic big-bang now reduced to a quasar process of reversal birth and extinction of central black holes.

And then we shall study through all those ages the evolution of its smaller parts to focus finally in the ∆-1 scale of stars of which the planet we live in is a relative membrane. Finally all this can be and will be mathematized in the 3rd and 4th lines when we expand the model to its quantitative isomorphisms (universal constants, class relationships, actions of space-time, variations and subspecies, etc.)

The scales of big-bangs

So let us now introduce 5D physics, with its alternative analysis of the big bang and the structure of the galaxy according to the Generator equation of the galaxy, mimetic to all other generators and its symmetries in space, time ages and scales.

The scales of big-bangs. The quasar big-bang.

image021In the graph, the scalar ‘big-bang’ at 4 levels: an electron, which in a Beta Decay explodes into an electron, radiation and a proton, and the similar inverse, nova that leaves behind a neutron star.

So when they had almost convinced NASA to send a probe to measure it, they found it was local, as most other if not ALL the features of that radiation.

Multiple space-times imply the existence of multiple big-bangs with different explosive size and speeds, all of them deaths of an informative mass or charge that uncoils its accelerated vortex into radiation following Einstein’s equation, E=M(c)2, where a bidimensional or tridimensional vortex (M or e) becomes extended into a plane of radiation (hence the square of lineal c-speed).

Yet for each different scale the parameters of speed (c), mass (M) and Entropy will change. And so we obtain a series of self-similar big-bangs described in the graph.

The single cosmic big-bang based in a single space-time continuum, was devised even before we knew the existence of a faster than light, gravitational membrane of dark Entropy and dark, quark matter. So we first must define it within that scale of big-bangs as the big-bang of a membrane of electromagnetic radiation; hence a quasar big-bang, not a cosmic big-bang, which will correspond to the much faster explosion of a gravitational membrane, starting at the Planck scale of the gravitational minimal units, the lambda-strings.

This is in a way the conclusion of astrophysicists, which now study the big bang as a dual process, with an inflationary age (the gravitational membrane) and a slower age (the big-bang of electromagnetic space, created over the gravitational membrane).

So instead of a fantastic big-bang particle that in the absolute past of time created all the absolute space of the Universe, we consider to exist in a fractal universe of infinite scales, where big-bangs are also scalar processes of creation and extinction of vortices of mass in several scales:

– There are big-bangs of atoms (beta decays) in quantum scales.

– There are star big-bangs (Novae or super-novae that create strange stars (pulsars) and black holes, (top quark stars)).

– There are galactic big-bangs, quasars, whose periodicity and background radiation coincides with the cosmic big-bang in its simplest formulation.

– And there are cosmic big-bangs (inflationary period of the big-bang), in which the gravitational membrane at non-local faster than light speed expanded before giving birth to electromagnetic membranes, forms warped around this primordial membrane.

Recap. The invariance of topological form at scale means that big-bang processes of death are common to all the scales of the Universe. What physicists call the big-bang seems to be a galactic big-bang.

Which big-bang fits better our cosmic data? Comparing them.

Indeed, the form of each scalar big-bang is the same, and it is remarkably identical in the supposed big-bang of the Universe; since both have an electromagnetic ‘orbital’ of dense ¥-rays, the fractal equivalent to the electron nebulae on the left. So how can we decide to which scale the ‘background radiation’ picture belongs?

We find the answer on the fact that quasar big-bangs (cycle of creation and destruction of the center of galaxies), is 10 to 20 billion years, and the supposed cosmic big-bang picture is 13.5 billion years. The same age that our galaxy, whose minimal time is 13.8 ± 4 billion years for the rich metal stars on BD +17° 3248. This is counter-intuitive: bigger systems in 5D live slower. For example, the smallest big-bang that of the left picture (beta decay), happens after a neutron life-span of 15 minutes. In that regard, the quantum, galactic and Universal scale should be if there is a Universal Scale on the same 5D time ‘slow down relationship’: Λ = Sp x Tƒ = K.

So the cosmic ‘big-bang’ should be at least one order of time-space older, which depending on the number of dimensions, should be 10, 100 or 1000 times more. Still considering the absolute minimal scale of time in 5D, 10 times longer (so civilizations live 800 years and humans 80) this gives us 140.000 million years, which stretching.

Now the 4 big-bangs are quite fascinating because of their similarities. Consider for example the relationship between the big-bang of a Neutron, or ‘beta decay’ and that of a star or Nova or Super-nova (second picture of Crab nebulae, the most famous supernova explosion of our galaxy).

A beta decay produces a photon, a neutrino, an electron and a proton, which expand the nucleon and in a double beta decay are hold together creating a hydrogen atom.

Now, a Supernova produces a black hole, which as we will see has the exact ‘Schwarzschild radius’ than a proton in 5 D Metric, a massive expansion of its plasma expelled to form the nebulae we see, which is the equivalent to the electron, a burst of Gamma rays, which are photons of high energy and an even higher burst of about 1059 neutrinos, an astounding quantity, which represent up to 10% of the mass of the star.

Those are thus the same elements of a beta-decay, but observed from our perspective as a single ‘particle’ in the lower scale and as a myriad of them in the upper scale. And yet the proportion of energy is similar.

A Beta decay expels a neutrino with 0.76 MeV energy-mass, which is 1/10th of the mass of the quarks that conform the proton collapsed into a neutron star in the nova or a black hole in the supernova.

There is thus no doubt that we are talking of 2 similar phenomena in 2 scales of the 5th dimension.

 

IV.Big bang as pseudoscience.

Religion of the big-bang vs. a sound dual theory of entropy and information.

The big-bang as pseudoscience

Based in assumptions with little proof – that we can move a lineal equation of expansion of space-distances between galaxies, similar to repulsive gravitation or electromagnetism, to an infinite past; that the background light spacetime radiation observed in the local galaxy, is produced in that remote past in all zones of the Universe; that it is possible to break all the known-known laws of physics (conservation of energy, momentum, and dibaryon number) and the basic tenants of logic (nothing can be created from nothing, space and time are eternal), that we can prescind of 96% of reality we don’t know what it is – dark matter and energy – to make a theory of everything – humans for lack of a BETTER formalism, have developed a theory of the meaning of it all, called the big-bang, which keeps mounting proves that falsify it, but is defended with the routines of dogma, proper of any established model of any science or religion in which people has invested money and time.

The situation in that sense is very similar to the one of the ‘ether theory’ prior to Einstein’s revolution. There was even a constant of ether in all text books of the age, and ether, a substance harder and denser than steel, existed in all the Universe (as now exists the expanding dark energy), for light to move so fast, as they didn’t have any other alternative theory to the motion of waves. Huge experiments and machines were designed to measure the ether. And when Einstein tried to deny it in logic grounds he was expelled from the German scientific scholar world and couldn’t even teach physics in a gymnasium.

The fact that he was a pacifist in pre-war Germany didn’t help so he found refuse in Switzerland in a patent office. And such was the opposition to his work that when he was given the Nobel prize for his work on quantum physics, relativity theory was not even mentioned.

We shall now provided with the expansion of our knowledge on the dimensions of the fractal organic Universe such a new explanation even if it is obvious we will not be ever considered for any Nobel Prize, or the theory will be ignored by dogma – not helping certainly the fact that I am better known for my pacifism and opposition to the European Industry of accelerators and its experiments at CERN that try to replicate the big-bang explosion on Earth and might produce black holes and strangelets on Earth, which should NOT evaporate, but absorb all the matter around them and risk the destruction of the planet. So to say my work is the most ignored new r=evolution of science since Einstein’s relativity is not an understatement.

I am simply an invisible man, ‘vaporized’ from science ever since, and so I am obliged to write my work on this anonymous web.

This said ‘those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods’ (Einstein). And that certainly will be the case of the big bang model, which if we ‘are still here’, as the century passes will have to be shelved as the ‘ether theory’ was, once the overwhelming evidence with new telescopes that the Universe is infinite continues churning proofs.

The Big Bang, has all the properties signaled as pseudoscience in ‘wikipedia’: statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be both scientific and factual, but are incompatible with the scientific method, contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; relying on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; which have lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; and long after they have been experimentally discredited…continue to be hold as ‘dogma’.

While those advocating such models of pseudoscience often dispute the characterization.

Why we say this about the big-bang is obvious. Logically is absurd that all the matter of reality was in a single point, including time and space itself. This is born of an exagerated, unfalsifiable claim – that a lineal equation of spacetime expansion between galaxies, V=HoD, extends infinitely to the pas. It is truly an example of ‘creationism’ in physics, based in mathematics. And it merely ignores what physicists do in all other analysis – the need to eliminate infinities and infinitesimals through ‘renormalization’ and cut-off processes – in this case the galaxies from where the emission of spacetime light takes place, which balance the Universe with its implosive gravitation.

Yet the rule of big-bang theory is to exaggerate experimental analysis. Such is the case of the background radiation observed only in the galaxy, which is considered with zero proofs to come from all the corners of the Universe. We falsify those arguments and many more in our analysis of cosmology. The graphs below show them at true value. Perhaps the most notorious is the finding of the supposed central track of the big-bang exactly above and below the galaxy, which shows not to come from 13 billion years light away but exactly from where it comes the background radiation – the galaxy itself.

Latter on we shall explain the alternative model of the big-bang, as a simple black hole the size of the commonest object of the galaxy, a moon will radiate exactly the same temperature. So it is more logic to consider that radiation comes from the galaxy, from some form of dark matter, black holes or strangelets which will redshift to such temperature the light of the galaxy.

The study of the galatom, the super organism of matter that extends across 3 scales of the fifth dimension, in which human co-exist, and it IS defined not by entropy as the vacuum space of cosmological ‘electromagnetic waves’ between gal atoms, but by a vortex of growing form, growing information, shared by every ‘entity living within the galatom – reason why information NOT entropy as physicists pretend is the dominant arrow of the galatom’s internal organisms.As such physics studies the largest ‘nested’ Universe but his deformation as a science by the worldly profession of ‘human’ physicists – to make weapons of entropic destruction –  is so extreme that the name seems to be tainted by those lineal, entropic errors. This only compares for the same reason with economics, the science that builds those machines, so deformed by ‘money’, as its only language of information, and detached from history, the super organism of mankind it should serve, that we also called ‘economics’, $, as it is not really the science of economics, the praxis of achieving the maximal welfare for the maximal number of human beings, but the ‘idol-ogy of capitalism’, full of myths and half truths.

Human Physics thus are plagued with so many pseudo-scientific errors in its cosmological theories (big-bang, time arrow) due to its errors of lineal time, its worldly profession – making transport machines and weapon of entropic destruction that among the natural sciences cosmology is by far the most deformed one. Problem is Humans are not humble enough to understand  the fractal Universe: an absolutely relative infinite reality where each atom is like a galaxy (but not exactly, fractals are slightly disimilar), each galaxy like an ‘anti-atom’ (as it has the maximal mass in it halo), and the forces of scales are parallel: electromagnetism is parallel to dark entropy expansion between galaxies, constantly increasing distances and ‘adding’ electromagnetic density. 

It is difficult to stress the degree of primitivism for the intuitive perception of the cyclical space-time regions and beings of the Universe, that represents to ‘simplify’ into linearity the infinite time clocks of information of the Universe. Once this informative quality of time cycles disappears, reality which is a flow of time-space cycles, synchronized and chained to each other by organic functions disappears.

And so man looses any understanding of the vital nature of the Universe, and starts to measure lineal motions as the meaning of it all. The vt=s, which has minimal information becomes then the regular form of knowledge, where the frequency and form of discontinuous time cycles disappears.

The big bang is not an experimental scientifically demonstrated theory of reality, but increasingly pseudo-science and dogma, on a model paradigm – one of the solutions to Einstein’s 4D spacetime Universe, which must change, because it is no longer valid to explain reality as it is. But as Kuhn rightly explains model paradigm is a difficult task that takes many years; or as Planck put it in sanguine terms, all previous ‘scholars must die for new people to learn the better model’.

In that regard, in the largest possible model view, the big bang theory is merely a solution – the simplest one – to the equations of Einstein in 4D space-time, while the galatom concept of a fractal scalar Universe is the model solution when we add a new scale of reality, the fifth dimension of parts that evolve socially and emerge into wholes.  So the paradigm change would require the acceptance of the scalar dimension of parts and whole, which humans so grossly overlook as they wish to be the center of the Universe also in scale. 

We might say that the true change of paradigm will come then when physicists accept the 5th dimension of which the 4D model is its limit for a single plane of space-time, the one described by 4D relativity, or ‘light space-time’, the ‘background space’ of the galaxy.

But even without the use of 5D formalism and the proper expansion of relativity we shall trace latter on, we can explain in layman terms the ‘errors of the big-bang’, which correspond to pseudo-science – that is, the need humans have for absolute theories of reality based in scanty proofs but gifted with a moral metaphorical or pseudo-religious outlook that makes them so pleasant to the ‘eye’=I.

The problem with the big-bang though is bigger than a simple model change, as it is the metaphysical model of mankind today, so it is the ‘theoretical religion’ of our technological civilization and this gives it some characters of dogma and pleases the human ego… As it is AN ALL ENCOMPASSING concept with the pretension of knowing it all about reality, measuring it all, seizing with the humind all what exists and beyond, making man again the intellectual center of the Universe.

On the other hand, a more humble infinite, immortal fractal Universe leaves us back into where we belong; the absolute relativity of an infinitesimal existence. And this while being scientifically, objectively more pleasant collides with the human subjective ego that has always ‘surrender’ the imagination of the masses.

Indeed, in those sociological aspects I  quite similar to the creationist models of Abrahamic religions, in which an infinitesimal human being ‘believed’ to understand the meaning of it all, because God, the mind of the Universe reduced itself in the big bang to another infinitesimal point, easy to handle by the arrogant ego-centered bronze age peasant, which became the ‘only’ human to understand it all or the modern physicist who pretends a ‘simple lineal equation’ called the Hubble constant, V = Ho D, resumes it All.

So the religious priest will tell you ‘GOD’ explains it all, just 3 letters, 4 in the Jewish Tetragramaton, Yhwh, 5 in Allah. And there is no need for anything else. Alas from GoD to V≈hoD, from Abrahamic cults to big-bang cults 2 letters have changed to remain the same.

Irony aside we can then term this concept, ‘creationism mathematics’, as it is indeed a common philosophical error of all languages to be confused with reality itself, when they are merely a mirror of reality. So even before we discuss the ‘experimental’ supposed proofs of the big-bang with some detail, we have to ‘frame’ the theory within the human linguistic hyperbolic constant desire to convert a language into reality – from monetarist economics, to ‘life imitates art’, to ‘mathematics is the language of god’, to ‘God speaks arab’…

CREATIONISM VS. REALISM IN SCIENCE.

In the graph, philosophers of science have argued for very long that a ‘creationist’ theory, based only in language might be a nice fiction, a beautiful consistent language but they tend not to be truth, specially when they deal with ‘infinities’ – God, the absolute, the whole Universe, and infinitesimal point, etc. Since when we merely use creationist theories that isolate the language, as in the third age of any ‘linguistic science’, or person, there is an excess of form, unconnected to reality. This is the case of black hole evaporation or supersymmetry, proved wrong at CERN. Since the simple energy and geometry of reality imposes limits to the excessive ‘forms’ of pure language, by essence inflationary, as a ‘mirror of reality’ with multiple ‘reflected images’. Those errors were classified already by Kant as paralogic errors of the mind. Kant, being with Schopenhauer, a favorite of Einstein (and myself), who read them as a teenager, prompted him to say ‘I know when maths are truth=consistent but not real=describing a real physical fact.

Cernies, unlike serious scientists, believe in mathematical creationism to justify their machines: they invent mathematical equations that become the ‘religious naming’ of its ‘human-created’ particles that of course never show up as the efficient Universe can perfectly be constructed with the III families of quarks and its symmetry with the 3 regions of the galaxy, shown below. This is the experimentally sound and epistemologically correct way to construct the galaxy according to the economic ‘Occam’s principle’:

 

Creationist mathematics as creationist religion is ultimately based in some ‘ugly’ principles – the ego paradox of both physicists and priests who want to talk in exclusive mode the supposed single language of man; and their lack of intelligence so well described by Schopenhauer’s definition of ‘stupidity’, which in the paradoxical humor of the Universe makes precisely the most ignorant to think they are the most intelligent and is the origin of ‘magic thought’, which is how we should classify both creationisms.
Regarding languages, there are infinite ‘mind-mirrors’ or ‘monads’ that gauge information from its biased perspective, which means that the relationship between languages and the order of reality is a back and forth ‘local’ process: the mind gauges information and then organizes its territorial ‘body’, mirroring its languages on reality. Maths are likely in topological, geometric form the ‘mind of atoms’, and so its laws of order are all pervading. Words are the ‘mind of humans’ and so in History the legal and ethic order trying to construct a superorganism of history, religion, nation or civilization is al, pervading.

So creationism is just a simplified, ‘one-way’ version of complex organicism and the interrelation between ‘still languages’ that mirror into a small virtual spatial form, the moving cycles of all beings. And this perhaps Aristotle and Leibniz understood better than any scientist does today: ‘Gods are unmoved points that order the energy around them’ . Whereas those unmoved ‘fractal points’ that gauge information are Leibniz’s monads: ‘every (fractal, Non-Euclidean) point holds a world within itself’. And energy the substance of the body waves they order.

This is the essence of the absurd theory of the big bang, according to which V=hod, in this case not the mind but the entire Universe reduced itself to an infinitesimal point which was the ‘beginning of time and space’ that only physicists (and creationist, biblical priests that sponsor the concept – in fact ‘discovered’ by a catholic priest, Mr. Lemaitre), the high popes of science understand with an arcane ‘latin language’ called mathematics.

Creationist mathematics becomes pseudoscience.

In reality that equation is so simple that one cannot avoid a smile, when people tells you Physicists are the absolute geniuses of mankind. It merely means that galaxies are separating because the light, an entropic, lineal, expansive force between them, elongates its wave as it moves. There is nothing else, but already Einstein said ‘imagination’ is more important than intelligence. So as religious people have made of God with good imagination and pumping-ego ceremonies the meaning of it all, nuclear physicists have extracted from that single fact – light elongates as an entropic force between galaxies, with a ‘lot of imagination’, half-lies and statistics the meaning of it all.

How they did it? Simple: they just move backwards this light expansion, and concluded that as light expands between galaxies, if we run it backwards it must have imploded into a single point, the ‘origin of it all’ which their Vhod describes as the graph shows.

Never mind light NOT only expands when free but it contracts within galaxies by the force of gravitation, balancing thus, the expansive E=mc2 death of mass into radiation, with the implosive, M=E/c2 informative implosion of light into mass particles and galaxies, making reality a wobbling balanced immortal infinity of dying mass and imploding light. Indeed, if you run backward the equation of light expansion, you just will get back to the atom of the galaxy that emitted that ray of light – AS ALL EQUATIONS ARE FINITE and happen only as long as the phenomenon they describe exists – in this case the ray of light that expands does NOT go back into an infinitesimal point because all LIGHT is produced by particles according to the E=mc2 equation. 

Yet the big-bang dogma merely rejects to put the most famous equation of physics, E=mc2 at work, as the abrahamic cult denies any other ‘letters’ to God. It is only God, or Yhwh or Allah (even if actually the 3 religions says it is the same God). In physics it is only Vhod not E=mc2, what matters. You just vehemently deny the other ‘letters’ matter at all to create matter (play with words, as it is all just funny egos jumping me, i and myself only, if it had not so ugly collateral effects).

Thus the big bang is just a theory based in the wordily profession of nuclear physicists (make atomic bombs). So disregarding the arrow of information and life, which is the creative force of the Universe, physicists pretend to interpret reality only with the arrow of destruction and death, they call ‘entropy’, and merely moved backwards in time a lineal, simple equation of entropy, to pretend it moved backwards till this supposed explosion collapsed into a tractable infinitesimal point, much more smaller than the human ego. The parallels between those 2 supreme ‘theories of the subjective ego’ are multiple.

The peasant Meshu thought God was the bush their goats munched because that was his professional ‘food’. And he denied therefore the immanent sacred nature of all what exists, made of the same ‘plenum substance’, impersonal space and time. God was in his bush. The arawak who ate turtles thought God was a huge turtle over which the Earth floated.

The nuclear industry which makes nuclear bombs designed a theory of the Universe, in which only its ‘entropic process’ of explosive death accounted for the creation of the entire Universe. So of course, the people who hold the alternative sound-sound theory, called the steady state Universe, from Einstein to Hoyle, who affirmed ad maximal there would be a quasar big-bang, observed experimentally balanced by the creation of mass, laughed at them and called its theory the ‘big-bang’, arguing their makers were either ‘creationist priests’ (Lemaitre) or people working in the nuclear industry (Gamow). It was then business as usual: ad hominem attacks on Einstein and Hoyle, the P.r.ess heralding Gamow as a genius, since it backed the nuclear weapons industry and justified experiments and industries that researched them, such as CERN created then. And soon they recruited their twin believers in creationist points and G. bushes, so the church who still denied Evoution jumped on the wagon and every sound proof of the steady state Universe was dismissed and every fool proof of the Big bang was canonised, as we explain in our right side articles on 5D and cosmology which studies the falsehood of big-bang theories.

Indeed for God to be unique, it was just needed to kill all rival gods, and we are still on the business of killing each other to prove our ‘letters matter more’. And for the big bang to work, it was just needed to DENY all other causes of the process of DUAL informative creation of mass and entropic destruction of mass into radiation. This of course created the paradox that physicists used e=mc2 to explode bombs but deny their equation to uphold Vhod.

At this point things became a little surrealist: physicists changed the name of the arrow of information and life and called it ‘negantropy’, the negation of death, as if negating death was a ‘sin’ and information and life was irrelevant, something Vhod could dispose of.

They also denied the most important in-formative force of the Universe, gravitation, which ‘forms’ the mass of galaxies, as time goes by. So Einstein, the only sound mind, who merely did ‘thought experiments’ said that ‘time curves space into mass’. So the creation of mass balances the entropic flows of pure light space without form between those galaxies.

Screen Shot 2016-06-12 at 15.32.50And the result is an immortal wobbling spring like Universe, where according to Einstein’s equation: E=M(c2), entropy reigns in the electromagnetic forces and light transiting between galaxies, expanding its space-time. But then it collapses within galaxies, creating with gravitational forces, in-form-ation. And this arrow of form and life is more important. Since we humans live in one of those vortices of time collapsing into mass, called the milky way, in one of its cyclical, turning planets that evolves information, through the processes of life and technology and human languages of thought. SO IT MATTERS MORE to understand mass and life than entropy and vacuum expansive space. The next graph shows schematically one of those galaxies wobbling.

In the graph, absolute relativity postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: Entropy<=>Mass (c2), which obviously has 2 arrows of time, and so it was in fact first described first, as M=E/c2, that is a process that transforms entropy into mass and information, stored in the frequency of those accelerated mass cycles.

Now, the ‘steady state theory’ of the Universe has always come to this simple realisation: the creation of mass eliminates the need for a singularity. There are a few different versions and duality merely makes them even more sound. The best elaboration of this steady state dual expansive-implosive Universe, departing from earlier work by Einstein and Fred Hoyle, is the concept of a series of local big-bangs, called quasars, proved recently by the 20 billion years tabulated cycle of galaxies, shown above.

Further on the cycles is reinforced by the fact that big-bang radiation is measured locally, as Penzias and Wilson were indeed measuring the background radiation of the galaxy,  a fact recently rediscovered by the observance of 2 ‘electromagnetic lobes’ on the galaxy, which are exactly the same found in the supposed mapping of the whole Universe. Below we observe the ‘supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmos, which turn out to be exactly the 2 lobes of our galaxy, recently discovered, and the fact that from quantum atoms to galaxies, there are E=Mc2 double big-bangs from beta decay to novas of stars and planets to galaxies:

In the graph the galactic big-bang, and the scales of it. The reader should observe that the image supposedly obtained from BG radiation of a cosmic big-bang (left) is exactly the picture of the galaxy (center), recently proved, when the two central lobes were found above and below the Sagittarius black hole.

Physicists thought they were remants of a 13 billion light-years ago/distant Big Bang, so Smolin was trying to prove one of his theories about long time changes in the frequency of light waves, measuring the light coming from the 2 supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, since he thought high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light.

So as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago a small difference on his arrival time should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy was huge and the experiment was cancelled. Since they were not occupying supposedly ‘a monumental piece of the entire Universe…

Alas, you think dogma changed? Of course not. Once a theory has been made sacred the enormous ridicule that one hundred years of calculus on the subject would imply for all astrophysicists has made impossible to change theory as their practitioners become now inquisitors of thought. Indeed, in the previous paradigm, before Einstein, ‘ether’ was the substance through which light moved. It was an absurd substance, denser than steel, softer than butter, through which planets raced, so to allow the canonical equation of wave-speed to move through at light speed… Einstein ridiculed it and he was outcasted from the physical community for a decade, having to work in a patent office, since experimental evidence of the so called aether drag had been observed by German physicists to enormous accuracy and the ‘constant of ether’ had become along the charge of the electron and the G constant one of the 3 canonical constants of all texts of late XIX century physics. Expensive experiments were devised to further measure to the 10th decimal the constant of Ether, in a subject that was obviously closed to amateurs like Mr. Einstein.

So today we have measured to extreme degrees of accuracy – to the first nanonanonano second the birth of the Universe, not to be argued, as there are so many ‘proofs’ of cosmic creation that tthe law of silence on the religion of meta-physics will bury all the news that prove it otherwise – some of which will be studied latter in this post.

And so the big-bang proved false by experimental evidence in both ‘distance’ of the radiation (above) and ‘ages’ of its galaxies (by huge black holes found on the ‘edge’ of time, perfectly formed as shown latter in an artistic graph), cannot be tumbled down by ‘blasphemous’ scientists who dare to put experimental evidence and sound theory about ‘truth’.

So what is the origin of the ‘back ground radiation’ if it is not the edge of time? The obvious candidate that should have been considered in first place, ultra heavy dark matter, as the galaxy is teaming with strangelets and black holes, its ‘top predator’ celestial bodies that feed on planets and stars and end up converting galaxies in ‘dark matter’ ultra heavy dark galaxies.

Since the background radiation can only be produced today not in a distant past, by a black hole or dark matter strangelet gravitationally redshifting light as it passes nearby. This phenomena is the gravitational redshift, and so it only remains to calculate what should be the Weight of a micro-black hole or strangelet that redshift light at the exact temperature of the blackground radiation:

And so a huge proof of the Fermi Paradox comes through Einstein’s gravitational redshift: a black hole or strangelet which has eaten the mass of a moon, the most abundant planetary size of the galaxy, will produce exactly redshifted background black body radiation at 2.7 k,

So the SUPPOSED absolute proof of a cosmic big-bang IS in fact without ‘extrapolations into an infinitesimal past point’ perfectly explained now IF the light matter of the galaxy ‘feeds’ the dark matter of the halo, which WILL thereafter redshift constantly gravitationally (another Einstein effect) light all over the galaxy and light coming inside the galaxy at 2.7 K.

Further on, when we calculate the mass of those black holes at 2.7 k turns out to be the exact weight of a moon ‘MACHO’ (Massive Halo Object). So since moons are the commonest object of the Universe, it is reasonably to think that the ‘lost’ primordial black holes that should appear in a quasar big-bang explosion of a galaxy, which Hawking painstakingly try to find evaporating, did NOT evaporate, but are lurking with its identical mass (as primordial particles all have equal mass, so the smallest possible black hole should have a similar ‘species’ mass, similar to the object it feeds on to reproduce), all over the galaxy… 

Again in Epistemology WHEN 2 POSSIBLE CAUSES OF A phenomena happen, the sound SOUND ONE, is the cause that happens NOW. It is like if you try to explain your 37 degrees of body temperature and you have a doctor that tells you the NOW-now cause – the activity of your cells at 37 degrees, as the activity of dark matter of moon masses (called MACHOs) today at 2.7 K. Obviously this is a sound theory

Now imagine a ‘guru’ that comes and tells you, your 37º temperature is in fact caused by the ‘cooling’ of your temperature at the moment of your birth which was then ‘3 trillion degrees’, and I have a lineal equation that proves you have been getting colder till now, exactly at the required speed to get now 37 degrees. You will think he is cuckoo because he NEVER measured your temperature in the past, so he is making a non-scientific extrapolation. Well THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT Gamow did. He came to the conclusion that the Universe had cooled down from the singularity of trillions of degrees to the almost ‘absolute zero’ of 20 degrees… Wait, it is not 2.7 K background radiation?

Yes, he FAILED COMPLETELY TO FORECAST it. But when Penzias measured the then called ‘galaxy temperature’ at 2.7 K, GAMOW simply a posteriori changed his lineal equation to meet 2.7 k now, and then a flurry of ‘egolatric’ scientists decided it was NOT local but cosmic radiation. Because that kept them as ‘the new high popes of creationism’ and the meaning of it all. AND AGAINST RELIGIONS I DO NOT REASON.

The understanding of the Universe with the same data but a different philosophy of science, organicism, will bring a completely different reality, and this might seem strange to the reader, brain-boxed in the belief on unitarianism. The Universe, we shall repeat ad nauseam has an intelligence and logic far more complex than one-dimensional man.

Consider the fundamental proof of the big-bang, the so called background radiation. As it happened it was measured on the galaxy, and so we must find another explanation. As it happens, a black hole of the size of the moon, the commonest form of the galaxy will reproduce them. As it happens there must be 3 type of black holes – size always coming on 3 scalar families, of which 2 have been found, the galactic ones and the ones produced by star novas. So we need the primordial black holes of the quasar life-death cycle of galaxies, which DO NOT EVAPORATE as hawking with his faulty analysis of time arrows based on a supposed ‘entropy of black holes’, believed – but never found experimental proof of it. So where are those primordial black hole of a smallish size. They are all over the galaxy red shifting with the mass of a moon, light at the exact temperature of the background radiation. I called them Moon MACHOs (Massive Cold matter Halo Objects).

And what they do in organic terms happens in EVERY system of nature. It is Claude Bernard’s principle of the constancy of an organism’s “internal environment” called homeostasis-the self-regulatory mechanism that allows organisms to maintain themselves in a state of dynamic balance with their variables fluctuating between tolerance limits.

It is indeed a temperature that provides ‘energy’ to larger, colder black holes, and allows the superfluid states of Helium, which is essential to the complex organic processes of creation of matter in the galaxy to take place also in cold-fusion (remember, physicists do not recognize the arrow of coldness which is essential to all process of information, so they tend to dismiss anything ‘cold’ to find then that actually cold dominates heat, centers of planets have crystals, NOT hot chaotic plasma, and the emission of neutrinos in stars shows the interior to be colder than thought. It IS the external membrane by definition, with maximal angular momentum/speed/temperature what is hot. The internal brain-singularity IS always cold, but those details of thermodynamics belong to more specific posts (that only recently is treated in parallel to ‘cryodynamics’, with a Beta factor of coldness, increasingly deemed more important – 3o years since the first models of 5D, I have seen the entire ‘roast’ of sciences coming individually in all its details to this all-together now philosophy of science, even if it has so far being ignored by the routines of scientific repetition of outdated models and specialist zeals, and the overall cynicism of scientists who don’t believe anymore a human mind instead of a computer can reach further in the understanding of the ‘higher logic’ of God)

But monism must reign by dogma. Only heat not cold must matter, only entropy not information, only big-bang not big-crunch, only our human scale, not the infinite ones….

In the graph, the pseudo-science of the black hole consists on finding always the most bizarre possible explanations to fact, as long as they validate ‘a posteriori’ an experimental fact that refutes the big-bang.

This was done with the supposed ‘Background radiation’, found NOT on the Universe (as we cannot take measures beyond the Earth) but on the galaxy; which did NOT coincide with theory (around 20 K degrees) and implied to move towards INFINITY into the past with a lineal equation a function measured in the present (epistemologically at fault), and did NOT account for 96% of the mass of the Universe (dark heavy matter not found yet then).

As an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘big-bang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers to be of 20 bullion years for the destruction and formation of its central ‘bar’, further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood.

As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang.

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

So for a century what cosmologists do is to ‘force-feed’ any proof of reality into the creationist big-bang equations, tinkering with their models whenever an exception to the model comes in, adding ‘new epicycles’, as long as we can ‘keep’ our cherished creationist theory that proves, we astrophysicists know it all.

So even if it is written in mathematics the big-bang theory, because it does not follow the logic, espitemologic and experimental law of the scientific method is false.

Pseudo-science.

In that sense, the Big Bang, has all the properties signaled as pseudoscience in ‘wikipedia’: statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be both scientific and factual, but are incompatible with the scientific method, contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; relying on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; which have lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; and long after they have been experimentally discredited…continue to be hold as ‘dogma’.

While those advocating such models of pseudoscience often dispute the characterization.

Why we say this about the big-bang is obvious. Logically is absurd that all the matter of reality was in a single point, including time and space itself. This is born of an exagerated, unfalsifiable claim – that a lineal equation of spacetime expansion between galaxies, V=HoD, extends infinitely to the pas. It is truly an example of ‘creationism’ in physics, based in mathematics. And it merely ignores what physicists do in all other analysis – the need to eliminate infinities and infinitesimals through ‘renormalization’ and cut-off processes – in this case the galaxies from where the emission of spacetime light takes place, which balance the Universe with its implosive gravitation.

Yet the rule of big-bang theory is to exaggerate experimental analysis. Such is the case of the background radiation observed only in the galaxy, which is considered with zero proofs to come from all the corners of the Universe. We falsify those arguments and many more in our analysis of cosmology. The graphs below show them at true value. Perhaps the most notorious is the finding of the supposed central track of the big-bang exactly above and below the galaxy, which shows not to come from 13 billion years light away but exactly from where it comes the background radiation – the galaxy itself.

Another proof of the many considered on our texts on cosmology –  as physicists keep looking far away to the supposed beginning of time, they keep finding perfeclty formed galaxies and black holes, wich breaks completely the supposed ‘time periods of creation of matter’. In the graph we can see the biggest black hole found in the Universe, which is perfectly formed in the middle of a galaxy, that is just 400 millions after the supposed big-bang when there was only supposedly hydrogen ions:

In the graph, the superblack hole is supposed to exist so early that there is no way it formed unless the Universe is eternal and the cosmic horizon of the big-bang just the limit of human perception of light, which as everything in 5D is NOT infinite in range.

Now and here 5D physics departs sharply from current astrophysics and its ‘paralogic’ Kantian errors (which break the scientific method in the egocy of the cosmologist wanting to have an explanation for all even when his range of perception does not allow it), there is NOT infinite range force, because infinities are always broken by cyclical membrane.

In the jargon of physics range of forces depend on mass. But t is ‘obvious’ that the photon does HAVE energy hence it does HAVE mass, E=hƒ, so even if its mass is extremely small the range of the photon CANNOT be infinite.

Moreover the further away we look, we shall see photons of less mass-frequency, hence redshifted, as those of more mass-blue frequency had died.

So that explains the red shift simply.

The distance-range of light is inversely proportional to its frequency-mass

Hence the existence of a limit or horizon of perception of light, from where we just see those monstrous objects – the biggest black holes.

What is then the limit of perception of light? As we have experimental evidence there is no need to do further calculus: Obviously the 13.5 billion light years from where red-shifted light of maximal z comes mistakingly taken as a time horizon of a supposed big-bang explosion.  

And from this fact it also follows that the further away we look, the more likely we are to find only huge black holes, as they will emit more energetic high frequency particles that will take longer time to relax in terms of the 4Ðimotion of entropy when they reach us before dying into a red frequency, blacking out of our perception of further away galaxies.

And here is where the magic 10¹°-¹¹ number common to all structures of nature, both in space-populations/distances in time-frequencies/durations and in scale/masses shows in (we will find it in the number of neurons of the biggest human brain, of stars in the galaxy, of atoms in a DNA code, etc, for reasons studied on our posts on ‘fractal non-euclidean mathematics):

This is the number that gives us in the symmetry of time the mean life of stars, and the mean life of its minimal light space-time ‘unit’ of information, and the mean mass of the largest black holes from far away distances measured in terms of the mean star mass – our sun, and the mean distance of the black out horizon of the big-bang…

So of course while in 5 Ð, as we know the Universe is eternal, the big bang does not exist, we have far more sound logical and epistemological and experimental proofs to explain everything that seems to prove the delirious big-bang in which time and space started from a point that fits in our hand, and pleases our egocy of being above heavens and earth.

In the graph, the largest black hole found is also the oldest, as it is the furthest, and it was supposed to be born in 500 million years after the big-bang when only some re-ionization of light hydrogen atoms has happened.

It then takes the pain of creationist dogma and believers to tinkle with all the equations and models we have to feed computers till some simulation of very extremal conditions very unlikely to happen can give us some bizarre model that might explain how on the hell, in just 500 million years a black hole of the size of 66 billion suns appeared in the middle of a perfectly formed gargantuan galaxy. Rational answer BECAUSE THERE WAS NOT BIG-BANG.

Simplest proof. Such a black hole will live 10¹ºº years ad minimal (counting that there is black hole evaporation, another no-no error we explain in our 5Ð study of black holes)…

So by mere statistical probability, we exist within the supposed life of the Universe which we can at least elongate to the life of that galactic black hole in the absolute infancy of the Universe, more or less in the 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000…. keep adding 90 000001% of its life span, and the probability that we exist in that moment without any other data, is similarly 0.0000000……..(keep adding 90 zeros)1 % chance.

The big-bang as we shall show in so many pages of this blog is the very proof not of the birth of the Universe but of the ‘common nature’ of all huminds, scientific or religious: dogma and belief is always higher in the esteem of the majority of humans of any profession than truth and reasoning.

Or as Landau put it: ‘cosmologists are seldom right but never in doubt’.

We have thus considered more realist explanations to the 2 main proofs of the Big-bang: the red shift and the background radiation. And found a direct embarrassing proof against it: the existence of cosmic black holes form when there should exist. All those proofs had all the elements of pseudo-science, corrected a posteriori to force-feed the model. As they keep coming the model became more bizarre – first with an inflationary infinitesimal second in which the entire Universe expanding to infinite side (never mind the proponents consider sacred the c-speed limit of light).

We shall latter prove many other ‘discoveries’  of the big-bang to have simpler explanations – next in the line come two concepts; the abundance of helium, which happens to be maximal above the black hole in the center of the galaxies, hence clearly provoked by the not-so-well reactions latter explained in terms of 5D, to be originated not in a cosmic big-bang but in the local processes of creation of matter by the black hole.

The other great proof is yet another creationist concept – the infinite singularity.

 

The PROBLEM of all black hole and Big Bang singularity… mumble

is more of the same we shall say – an absurd mathematical expansion backwards in time of something we cannot even see here. NOBODY in any other science uses those mathematical creationist views that experimental evidence breaks because we want to keep doing mathematics. I.e. consider a frequency sound coming from a source, a bat, for example, if we were to return ad infinite the frequency observed with a long wavelength at a point of the air, we would reach a singularity of infinite frequency but THERE IS ALWAYS A CAUSE, A SOURCE of that wavelength, so when we reach the BAT frequency no longer increases. It is the real source.

What all THOSE BLACK HOLE EVAPORATION ARGUMENTS LOOSE IS THE FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH of science: a cause. If there is NOT matter, not a frozen start of top quarks as Einstein wanted at the origin of the gravitational FORCE of the black hole THERE IS NO CAUSE FOR GRAVITATION. Where it comes from the awesome gravitational force of the black hole, if mass does NOT exist? if there is not as Einstein wanted a cut-off substance, which can only be the top quarks that CERN will do in increasing quantities as the decay product of Higgs, to produce it?

Mathematicians like Hawking who shun off the basis of the experimental method and the physical real nature of Nature, don’t care. For them bats do NOT exist, their sound frequency is infinite. And the source is the bat ‘hole’.

But things get worse and worse when he is cornered by reality, it becomes really painful to read, as he then takes the authority of others – specially that of Einstein, lying all the way down, but shrewdly saying what he says is ‘General Relativity’. For example, when acknowledging the whole thing of bringing effects without limit towards an infinite past to get the ‘singularity of the big bang’, which Einstein vehemently protested, he said is canonical in Einstein’s work!:

“Cosmology can not predict anything about the universe unless it makes some assumption about the initial conditions. Without such an assumption, all one can say is that things are as they are now because they were as they were at an earlier stage. Yet many people believe that science should be concerned only with the local laws which govern how the universe evolves in time. They would feel that the boundary conditions for the universe that determine how the universe began were a question for metaphysics or religion rather than science.
The situation was made worse by the theorems that Roger and I proved. These showed that according to general relativity there should be a singularity in our past. At this singularity the field equations could not be defined. Thus classical general relativity brings about its own downfall: it predicts that it can’t predict the universe. Although many people welcomed this conclusion, it has always profoundly disturbed me. If the laws of physics could break down at the beginning of the universe, why couldn’t they break down any where.”

This is false. The laws of science don’t break down in the singularity BECAUSE THERE IS NO SINGULARITY. And IT IS NOT expected in Relativity to exist SINGULARITIES:  It is ONLY because they are moving backwards equations BEYOND the very same initial conditions that are REAL – in the case of a black hole a frozen star of dense quarks that cause gravitation…  and soon we shall explain how Einstein reacted to a bunch of people, driven to deny him which on top wanted his acquiescence. At the end he just got lonely overwhelmed by all the dwarfs biting his legs and expecting him ‘to like them’. But he quipped: ‘Since mathematicians are working in relativity, I don’t understand it myself’ ).

Now; so the reader doesn’t think I am biased, fact is almost every cosmologist knows the ascientificism of the big-bang and black hole singularities – the core ‘belief’ that impulses CERN and cosmology, ever since the ‘capital sin’ of egocy (ego+idiocy) of physicists, who decided to substitute religion and what is worst, philosophy of science and epistemology of truth with his equations, even at the cost of breaking the very essence of science; we shall bring here from Quora, an interesting site which doesn’t abandon scientific rigor, but tries to explain things easy, the most upvoted=liked answer to the question, ‘Do singularities exist?’, as it pretty well resumes in very simple terms the core of it.

The place is good to check ‘common sense’ as people are free to think with the authority of reason not the reason of authority.
 Creationist ego trips of physics running high since Bohr, are the ultimate reason that we might die courtesy of CERN. This I want to stress as a serious scientist: if we do it won’t be for the sake of science but for the sake of a machine and a bunch of ‘lunatics’ that indeed, think as Bohr did – ‘the moon becomes real when I look at it’ Realism and organicism ARE the dominant trends today in science, since machines turn out in robotics to be just evolving metal-organisms, and the realist model of quantum physics the Einstein->De Broglie->Bohm model keeps gathering proofs. It couldn’t be otherwise.
 So let us put some realist common sense on those equations, courtesy of quora:

How do we know that singularities exist?

“We” (science) do not know that. A “singularity” — in the scientific sense of the term — is not some kind of object, it is only a fancy name invented in order to avoid saying “we don’t know what’s happening in such a place, or if it even exists.” More often than not, it is a euphemism for division by zero, as in two cases that are repeated ad nauseam:

(1) The “initial singularity” (before the “big bang”): Here, cosmologists are making the assumption that — because they have interpreted galactic redshift observations to be evidence for “space expansion,” the Universe volume must have been smaller in the past — as they extrapolate “back in time,” and as the energy/mass content must have stayed the same (conservation laws), the Universe density must keep rising as we approach the “bang.”

The equation is very simple: Universe density ρUU = mUU/VUU, where mUU = Universe mass (energy), and VUU = Universe volume.

When VUU = 0, the equation no longer represents valid math, but rather than admitting that science does not know/understand how such a situation can be physically allowed to happen, science flat out lies, and declares that “density becomes infinite” (as they say temperature does, BTW, and for the same reason). Why is this wrong? Because infinity is not a number.

(2) The “gravitational singularity” at the center of a “black hole”: Here, cosmologists and astrophysicists are making the assumption that it is possible (“because Einstein’s equations tell us it must be so”) for any mass to be compressed into oblivion (nothingness), if only sufficient pressure is applied.

Again extrapolating, at the point where the radius of the gravitational collapsing body has been compressed to zero — Bingo! Again we have division by zero, and again the error is hidden behind a “singularity”! (that is, “we” (science) have no clue as to what might really be happening, or how it happens). Science, at its best?

Another well known case where the error is accepted (where again a division by zero is said to result in “infinity”) is Einstein’s “velocity equation” (the “Lorentz factor”), as presented by Wikipedia (article List of Relativistic Equations):

γ = 1/(1–β22)1/21/2

where β = v/c and v is the relative velocity between two inertial frames. For two frames at rest, γ = 1, and increases with relative velocity between the two inertial frames. As the relative velocity approaches the speed of light, γ.

Presented as if it was a cold, mathematical fact … Here, the error is shrouded by hands waving symbols around, but it all boils down to a division by zero, as follows: when v = c, then v/c = 1, and 122 = 1, and 1–1 = 0, and since the square root of 0 = 0, then 1/0 = undefined mathematical operation (i.e., an error) …

So far, the ratio of “bad science” over good ditto is singular: 3/0. Here’s a cut from my answer to the Quora question Is the pre- Big Bang “singularity” a black hole or quantum phenomenon?:

Here is a side-by-side comparison of the first two “singularities” unveiled above (there are more differences, these are just the most obvious (all in theory, of course):

Only one “singularity” property is the same in both types (shaded green): The classical (i.e., non-quantum) volume in both is zero, which is what leads to the “singularity” assumed to be “residing at the core” of both (that is, any mass m/0 = “singularity” (bogus: “infinity” is not a number!)).

Ending — as well as answering the OP question — with a quote showing a little bit less scientific hubris:

A singularity often turns up in our equations when we extend them as far as they can go in the past; but a singularity of this sort is far from likely to be an aspect of nature, and instead should be interpreted as a sign of what we don’t yet understand.

Source: Professor Matthew Strassler, theoretical physicist at the Large Hadron Collider

It is indeed a good synopsis on how not to do science with Mr. Strassler at CERN telling us they know perfectly all what they do and say is bull$hit.

That is the astounding cynicism of this institution that we find once and again. When talking officially at CERN, they sign confidentiality statements and are told ‘to believe in black hole evaporation’; when writing papers or making comment off-record, they all recognize it is all bull$hit. Never mind they might kill all our sons till the 7th generation. The P.r.ess and politicos and judges let them do it, just not to have to deal with a bunch of bullies just because they don’t understand their maths – reason why we keep explaining it all very simple here, just in case one of our ‘leaders of the world’ really do what we pay them to do – to stop terrorist organizations from bombing the planet, but it seems they care just for small bombings, not big-bang ones. That is OK. As they say, if you murder a few you are a… murderer, if you commit genocide you are a (national) hero. Murder at distance, wholesale has always been very easy to do. We never blame those who throw A-bombs or carpet bomb thousands children and women from planes but become horrified by any gore terror movie with a guy killing a couple of kids with a chain-shaw.  Because if CERN kill us will be at distance, likely with strange dibaryon heavy quark matter falling and accumulating on the center of the Earth or fast growing black holes, we shall have no proof and no time to blame them. And that seems to be enough for the unethical and amoral researchers dare to go with his egocy of exploring reality with big explosions and fantaphysics for lack of a serious scientific upgrading of our present cosmological knowledge with THOUGHT experiments and solid epistemology.

Down the article we shall explain, how we should be dealing with realism and improve on Einstein’s cosmological work NOT denying it but expanding it with the correspondence principle.

To close the singularity theme – in that graph is all clearly written, as a theoretical proof of the most likely real event those big-bangs describe: quasar black holes exploding into big-bangs of matter, and matter collapsing into galaxies, balancing each other.

Indeed, notice that the black hole equations are the inverse of a big-bang, but both are if we discharge INFINITIES AND ZEROS as NON-real, happening in a local domain, called the galaxy where all our measures take place.

So at best we can talk of a ‘Quasar’ big-bang, which is the ‘death’ of a black hole, inverse to its BIRTH with maximal temperature, and evaporation of ITS SURROUNDINGS as it cools down and feeds on light matter.

So from birth to death, a quark star, aka black hole, shows its inverse equations as birth is indeed the opposite of death. And this happens at the local level of the Galaxy or the star or the planet that explodes in a ‘little Big Bang’…

All other hyperbolic, infinite deductions of cosmological explosions are just the egocy of physicists trying to substitute the egocy of previous creationist priests, who also thought the language of words they talked was not A MIRROR of reality but reality itself, creating it – so Allah and Yahveh were creating ‘naming things’ in Arab and Hebrew and quarreling about who was the higher Mind of God, still do… So it did Hawking and Penrose, ‘numbering reality’, and expecting all kind of things Happen that never did.

The ego paradox.

Why astrophysicists then do not focus on the limits of known-unknowns.

The answer is the human ambition and anthropomorphic point of view, which is common to any of those Πthat feels himself the center of the Universe. It is the paradox of the ego. And we must introduce it because it is at the core of the ambition of cosmologists and its denial of true science when confronting the facts of his big-bang theory of it all.

Now a mind is defined by a simple equation:

O-mind (finitesimal) x ∞ time space cycles = Linguistic mapping of the Universe.

Thus a mind to fit the infinite time cycles in motion, reduces its dimensions and information to a series of bidimensional membranes of fixed form of information in a language used to map reality.

Humans do that with the infinite universe, reducing it to mathematical mappings. And thinking of course they are observing the ‘whole’. This is the recurrent theme of astrophysics – the denial of absolute relativity, as self-centered humans come back with a vengeance, with new ‘absolute frames of reference’. Now this absolute frame of reference is called the background radiation and the point of view is the creationist big bang.

And the proof of its falsity never mind because we do have to understand it all, and of course, when we do, we will be special beings within that whole. Since, the paradox of the ego tell us that:

‘Every finitesimal 0-mind perceives reality from its self-centered point of view, confusing the whole with the limited linguistic mind that perceives it’.

This is today the situation with the big-bang, falsified by innumerable proofs under the laws of the scientific method, but accepted as the ‘religion of physicists’, the new ‘religious gurus’ of our technological, ‘lineal civilizations.

Within the much larger frame of reference of T.Œ, all this resumes in the ego paradox. Humans MUST have an explanation for the whole, which makes it not so big, and rather controllable.

Experimentally is also the most natural conclusion, as its measure is taken locally also, around the Earth, origin could be then within the galaxy or the local group of galaxies, a mere turbulence of the clouds of gas and dark matter that surround the milky way. It is the first and most important of the 3 canonical proofs of the cosmic big bang. The second proof – the abundance of helium is equally explained by quasar big-bangs, as the equations of the big-bang ‘ages ‘are the same for the explosion of a black hole in the center of galaxies (in fact they are the reversed equations of the formation of a black hole, hence its process of entropic death), the 3rd proof, the age of the big-bang is falsified by the quasar cycle of birth and death of galaxies, which has a 10 to 20 billion years cycle.

And since we observe galaxies in a second cycle, the Universal big bang cannot be younger than a part of the Universe.

The 4th proof is the density of matter of the Universe, far lower than the one required for the big-bang which however is exactly the same density of matter of galaxies, once more proving the ‘local theory’ of a background radiation due to the explosion of a quasar galaxy – either ours, or a quasar of our local group; the 5th canonical proof is the red shift of light, which expands between galaxies, but again it is a lineal half-truth, which purposely ignores the warping of radiation into matter in the ecliptic of galaxies and the inverse blue shift flows jets of radiation that collapse and shrink space into matter coming from black holes (hence not arriving to Earth but seen laterally in most of them) and the natural death of light space-time, which has a life-death cycle similar to that of stars of around 10 billion years, explaining perfectly a first phase of red shift accelerated in the second phase o flight life (5 to 10 billion years), tracing the canonical 3 ‘ages of life’ of the 5D model of the Universe.

Yet the metaphysical proof is perhaps the most obvious: the birth of the entire Universe in a single point of space-time, just because we can run a lineal equation of the redshirts temperature of the present universe to the past with no limit till arriving to a ‘point’ of creation, is logically absurd; scientifically sick (as it requires a previous God-like creator) and natural only to the religious military ideologies of western science, dating back to Newton a pious believer in Yvwh and the lineal concept of time of Abrahamic religions and military science, who already considered a mechanist Universe the proof of the existence of the historic tribal God of the Hebrew.

The present revival of primitive idol-ogies of history thus must be studied NOT in astrophysics but in our section of history and the process of life and death of civilization, with its memorial revivalism in times of war and extinction

On my view astrophysicists have become believers, which will not reason, after a century of public awe as the new religious figures of mankind, and will never deny big-bang theory. Our life thought might be at stakes, as they will soon replicate a small quasar big bang at CERN.

Yet to fully grasp what physicists do at the LHC without much understanding of the process involved, we must go beyond present physics, outside the light space-time membrane of the galaxy, where the symmetry breaks between <c and > c speeds and <o K and > o k into…

 

 

 

IIII. COSMOLOGY:

Galatom and its Forces

‘Science advances when we drop assumptions’ Dirac

We made a huge statement – that existence is a 5Сmotion of scalar spacetime – and we shall back it with rational, detalied descriptions of those motions in the fifth dimension. That existence is merely a sum of motions or ‘steps’ or ‘actions’ each of the relative infinite infinitesimal minds that exist perform during its program of survival, its program of existence. But this completely meaningless – at this point – metaphysical statement requires a long ‘trip’, to arrive to the full logic sense of the sentence.

What universal beings do is to ‘move’ through ‘steps’ of spacetime in the Universe, during a finite time duration we call ‘life’ or ‘existence’, through a territory we call the world and within the world, vital space. So we shall first define a space-time being and the steps it makes.

The less important cycles for mankind of all those worldcycles of existence are those studied by physicists, the big-bang and big-crunch e=mcc cycles of phyisical life and death, whcih they reduce to the simplest ‘time arrows’, the locomotion and the final entropic death.

It is the big-bang theory of the Universe, which must be qualified as pseudo-science, as it does not pass the stringent elements of the experimental method. And it is perhaps the CLEAREST proof of the importance to have a proper understanding of the underlying elements of reality, time and space, to be able to understand what the Universe is about. Since plainly speaking, the big-bang is false, a deformation caused by the use of a single space continuum and a single lineal time arrow to describe all the dimotions of reality. 

However, given the egocy of our scientists who think to know it all, backed by the billions of ‘fans’ that ‘believe’ in present science and its reductionist, lineal theories of reality, as I know the reader is expecting us to comment on those theories of the whole Universe, in this introduction instead of dealing with the formalism of stience, we shall advance the analysis of…

The Universe as it is…
We define instead the Universe as a fractal system that reproduces spatial information and temporal energy, carried in the cycles and forms of its clocks of time in multiple scales of spatial size.
Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).

Time in physics.

First we must understand a simple truth: as all forms of space can be seen as motions in time, a curvature is a clock. As all forms that do not change and repeat its reproductive patterns are not really a change=motion in time, we see cyclical motions as solid forms. When time passes then a change must happen, which means that in physics time only passes when a system accelerates. A force then is defined, F=m a as the product of a present, not-changing form, a mass, and an accelerated motion, a time clock. The mass is thus the non-changing ‘center’ of the accelerated cyclical clock of time, the force proper. Hence the principle of equivalence of Einstein. When we extend the principle to charges, a charge will be the non-changing center of the accelerated clock of time we call the electric force. So happens for our thermodynamic scale, with a difference, worth to mention at this earlier stage: in our scale, the clocks of time are expansive not implosive, hence they are entropic 4Dimotions, measured by the clocks of temperature. Why? Because we are measuring in our scale the entropic, predatory absorption by our existences of energy from charges and masses.

In the entangled Universe of infinite ± balances we might say that we are sandwiched between both. And it is because we are entropic temperature that the whole thing doesn’t warp. Our pressure outwards as entropic beings balances the gravitational inwards pressure, and the charge collapse.

It follows then also that as time and space… yes you guess it are two sides of the same coin (: curvature is acceleration; and so the G and Q constants must be understood as curvature of two different scales, and as the curvature of charges are much bigger (their radius r is much smaller, so 1/r the measure of curvature or rather 1/r², the measure of the growth of curvature in an accelerated clock), its force is much larger. But when we apply to charges and masses the metric $ð=k, it turns out they are the same constant equation, proving A) the unification of forces or rather its constants G and Q, B) the superorganic nature of the galaxy, as both charges and masses’ constants are the co-invariant limits of maximal $ (masses’ curvature) and minimal $ but maximal ð (charges’ curvature, attractive power):

In the graph we observe what we just said in simple equations about the relationship between mass and frequency of an accelerated vortex, again expanded to the other planes, of which we observe in detail a thermodynamic vortex, which becomes a fractal of even faster eddies, beyond the ‘event horizon’ of the hurricane, a fact that will help us to establish the nature of frozen stars=aka black holes in our models of the galactic Eddie… 
Time as future only passes when it accelerates and time as past when it decelerates – when conserved it is a present energy. So the formalism of accelerated time vortices is self-similar in all scales.
In mathematical physics this means that ‘time clocks’ which truly advance’ time are accelerated vortices, of any of the three quantum scales we perceive, that is, charges, temperatures and masses, which measure through its frequency the speed-attractive force of its time clocks, paradoxically much larger for smaller vortices, reason why charges are far more attractive:
‘∆-1: frequency in lineal electromagnetic time flows of energy: e=hv’
∆-1,0 charge: for cyclical clocks of electromagnetism.
∆0, +1: temperature for lineal thermodynamic flows of energy
∆+1: Mass for cyclical vortices of accelerated time.
Frequency of temperature is though often studied as a lineal entropic clocks of time in a non-bounded motion, decelerating the pass of time towards the past. Or in a closed volume it measures as a clock a present steady state of matter  in a bounded stationary wave or closed system.
While charges and masses are time clocks of closed systems accelerating the past of time towards the future; as all is warped up in a world cycle of time moving towards the point of death of the vital energy attracted by the center of the system.

THE SUPŒRGANISMS OF PHYSICS: UNIVERSES, GALAXIES, ATOMS

IN THAT SENSE the biggest set of properties caused by the fractal co-existing structure of space and ternary worldcycles of creation and extinction of matter, is the super organic nature of matter, both at the cosmic galactic and quantum scale.

To that aim, we shall briefly study its 3 scales, the ∆+1 cosmic scale, the ∆º galactic scale and the ∆-1 atomic scale, o the understanding of  the organic ternary structure of the galaxy, since quarks are vortices of accelerated gravitational forces, masses of physical information and black holes and pulsars, which are fractals, made of quarks.

INDEED, The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:

Because the scalar Universe co-exists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational space-time), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under self-similar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic. 

This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 13.37.30

In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our gala cell exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scales of the fractal Universe. 

Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a pi-cycle with three diametral perimeters (π-3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a self-centred singularity in a pi cycle).

This secondary law of the paradox of Galileo, itself a secondary law of the ‘mind’s equation’ structures our universal view. And make us thing reality is abstract, void of intelligence and life, static and our mind the only perceiver of it.

The paradox of galileo – the maya of the senses, differentiating ‘motion from form’- form and distance are ‘mayas’ of the senses; as all its time and motion; when we get more information about a system. The 2 graphs represent the same local region of galaxies, in the right now that we have enough info, we see it as a flow of ‘gala cells’ transiting through veins of the cosmos, in the right as we used to see it – a dark series of ‘monad-galaxies’ with no motion.  All in the Universe is ultimately a dynamic PART of a supœrganism, extending in three scales of the absolute 5th dimension of time-space, performing relative ternary worldcycles on time-space 

 GALAXIES

When considering a new stience, in the isomorphic method we define its Γ.œ, generator function for each volume of the stience, a domain within the scales of the fifth dimension, of four dimensional structure and black and white wholes to the upper ∆+1 and lower ∆-1 scales of the fifth dimension.

Such block of timespace suffices to define most events happening around the systems of that scale of reality. Then we can define specific T.œ, generators of mind species, and get into as much detail as needed.

The different isomorphisms of galaxies as ‘physical atoms and ‘biological cells’.

Now because all systems have, as all systems do:

  • organic, co-exiting fractal properties and abstract, topological ones, galaxies can be modelled as organic systems, similar to cells or gala cells (something taboo on physics but very useful to make easier to understand them as organic systems are synoptic and intuitive, with less maths, so normal people can get the whole picture.).
  • and also as topological mathematical systems similar to atoms or atom-galaxies (something done often, without a good theoretical background we shall provide).
  • besides the usual properties and details of its specific nature.

in terms of scales of the fifth dimension, we say that the ∆+3 organism of the cosmos is the ‘cellular galaxy’, which we shall put in isomorphic comparison with the ∆o cell, the organism of the human scale to show its organic properties and with the ∆-2 atom, the organism of the quantum scale, to draw homologic comparisons of its topological and mathematical properties; as we shall show:

  • The mathematical equivalence of atoms and galaxies, unifying both topologically and algebraically with the Unification equation of charges and masses, based in 5D metric equations.
  • And the organic parallelism with the cell, unifying both with the analysis of the vital functions of both organisms.

The ∃xi≈stience of astrophysical systems is also ruled by the ternary isomorphism of space-time structures.

To understand that organic structure the best homology is between the 3 main ∃xistential functions of the 3 supœrganisms of the physical  scales.

So we shall compare the galaxy with the supœrganism we obtain max. information, from the perspective of human perception, the ∆º, living cell.

Thus we compare the galaxy and the human ∆o-cell pov and its 3 elements: the Spe-membrane≈ halo, the singularity ≈ nucleus, and the cytoplasm ≈ star disk. And so we CAN ALSO define the ‘galacell’ and its 3 topo-biological parts, in organic terms; since the galatom is a galaxy from the cosmological view; a cell from the organic, thermodynamic of black holes, its ‘DNA’ and a quantum ensemble of atoms from its scalar perspective, but a mere atom itself from the point of view of the Universe as a whole.

Correspondence principle between locomotion and all dimotions

Unlike the simplified concept of time=change=locomotion of physicists as ONLY change=translation in space (v=s/t), when we add the ‘biological’, evolutionary time=change in in/form/ation, we can also explain the biological changes of life and death of human organisms, our topological VARIATIONS of forms in (evolution theory), and the mirrors of those changes produced by our languages of perception… which become the memetic ‘languages’ that organize change in the social organisms of history, mankind in time.
So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).
SINCE HUMAN AND BIOLOGICAL CHANGE is primarily ‘informative, social, technological and biological time=change’ NOT translative change=time, the ONLY one physicists study.
So we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discovered their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, also called Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein, which defined time as the fourth dimension of space, since physicists merely was used it to measure spatial changes in location.

It follows then that what mathematical physicists measure in spacetime is a ‘step’ of minimal size and duration, and for that aim they use ‘derivatives’, a mathematical operandi that ‘reduces’ the measure to the ‘infinitesimal’ moment of present time and the smallest possible step taken (∂t, ∂s), to avoid any internal informative ‘long-time range change’. So we write speed in Galilean relativity as an infinite sum of infinitesimal present measures: ∂v=∂s/∂t. And so did Einstein, when he reduced spacetime measure to ‘simultaneous’, present ‘derivative=instantaneous steps’, adding his ct-correction factor:

∂S²=∂Sx²+∂Sy²+∂Sz²-c²∂t²

And that is fine. The best way to measure translation in space is adding all those minimalist steps and disregard internal change of form and information (which would make more complex those motions as when a system explodes and the single motion breaks into multiple ones). What is wrong and it has been a huge handicap to advance our understanding of spacetime and information and its changes inside beings is to consider as so many people do that to measure locomotion is ALL what we need to know about time=change. 

This shall change from now on, once the 5th dimension of time space enter mainstream science. As the fifth dimension of ‘time’ from an absolute past to an absolute future, expands vastly our understanding of time, its causality and ‘repetitive clock-like cycles’ of events.

From now on, time will no longer be a simple lineal dimension used to measure small, present steps of an external locomotion but a bidimensional cycle, as all clocks of time are. This is obvious geometrically as when we add a ‘dimension’ to a line of time space we get a ‘circle’. And it is obvious logically, since all systems in time return to its origin from birth to extinction; all events repeat, and all laws of science are just ‘inferences’ from the cyclical repetition of time events.

The fifth dimension thus will explain both the causality of time events, its world cycles of existence and the repetitive patterns of ‘stience’ (the exist¡ence of space-time organisms).

As we shall consider the 4 С formalism a simplified version of 5Ð, or the ‘limit’ of knowledge we can acquire if we reduce time-space dimotions (ab. dimensional motions) to a single one, locomotion, of which physicists have exhausted truly all knowledge but ‘forgot’, for we, human beings is most important to know besides the worldlines of locomotion, the world cycles of change in our forms of ‘in-form-ation’, namely our life and death cycle.

So the fifth dimension will study the missing dimension of time cycles that make reality possible to describe as it is: a series of beings which are born, evolve, grow and dissolve back completing its zero-sum of existence.

The change in the in-form-ation of beings: the missed ‘time arrow’ in physics.

We all know time=motion=change is not only of locomotion-position in space or external change, but also internal motion=change; that is change in the form, in the in-form-ation of beings, as when you are born, grow, live, change, wrinkle and die…

This IS what we call here the fifth dimension which is NOT an impossible dimension of space but a very real dimension of TIME=motion=change in the information of beings.  So we shall call it a ‘Ðimotion’, ab. for Dimensional motion. We thus affirm that there are two type of fundamental ‘Dimotions’ of timespace, change in the external Dimotion of beings or locomotion and change in the internal form of the being, or Dimotion of in-form-ation, form-in-action, studied mostly by biology. But both Ðimotions should apply to all systems, physical, biological and linguistic, mental.

Most scientists study only one type of change: physicists study a Universe built only with the ‘Dimotion’ of locomotion, which in its most extreme case, they call entropy; biologists study the Time-Dimotion of information. And this restricts both its field of inquire and bias the results they obtain, since the beginning of a thorough, proper study of all timespace changes must consider that DUALITY of timespace changes, both together. 

And for that reason, the science of duality was born, which is the science I used to preside in the International congress of systems sciences (ab. ISSS), the association where the modern discipline was born at the death of Einstein at the Macy’s congress, back in the 50s. It would be the foundational congress of the sciences of information and cybernetics, when the foremost scientists of that age came together, realizing the approach of physicists to time was lacking and the merge of biology and physics required first a proper formalism of both concepts of time, which is the goal achieved in this blog.

Welcome then to the infinite fractal Universe of mind-mirrors, monads, worlds that seems infinite but are absolutely relative, all hidden in the infinitesimal fractal point of a mind, which is an island-universe in itself.

Time requires accelerated motion.
All what exist is a motion in time. Space forms are Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.
How we perceive the previous scheme of time clocks in physical particles is self-evident: vortices of accelerated forces (Equivalence principle of Einstein) are the TIME CLOCKS of physical systems, which carry in the frequency and form of its cycles the information of the Universe and they are accelerated if ‘time is going to advance’ towards a 3rd warped age, from galaxies (cosmological vortices) to charges (quantum vortices). If the system is conserved and doesn’t change in a present state we talk of a conserved present-energy; if the system dissipates and looses form as it expands in time and finally stops, we talk of an entropic, relative ‘past’ state.
Energy is the main parameter physics uses to calculate physical world cycles which in computed for the whole existence of the physical event becomes a conservative zero cycle that does not spends energy. The energy of the system thus represents the simplest quantitative value of the capacity of the being to exist, its top predator force, total momentum, length and density of its worldccyle etc.
We thus need to make a whole redefinition of energy to fully grasp world cycles.
As we shall explore both concepts together, we will also observe the symmetries which energy display in space as world cycles do with the super organisms they create.
Now the funny thing as usual is that the seemingly perennial super organisms in space are the fleeting mayas of the world cycle of time, the dynamic motion patterns of information, form-in-action which is what truly states on the long term. So goes for energy, which stays while the fleeting physical systems mutate.
Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). 
HOW RIDICULOUS then is to still USE THE PRIMITIVE CONCEPT OF A SINGLE lineal CLOCK OF TIME-locomotion ONLY FOR THE WHOLE UNIVERSE rejecting the addition of the ‘real clocks of time’ of the Universe, its vortices of cosmological mass and quantum charge that ‘fold/warp’ the ‘lineal one-dimensional flat entropy between galaxies’ into 3 Dimensions?
The answer will seem an insult to cosmologists but it is what it is: as ridiculous as talking of Yhwh, the toponym for Judea in ancient Egyptian maps, hence the nation of judaism, as the creator of the Universe… And so obvious as that absurdity when you STOP beliefs and REASON, something scientists ‘think they do’ but mostly don’t:

dark matter

Matter folds one-dimensional ‘dark entropy’ which expands mass into space, into 3 dimensional matter. Hence 3 ‘volumes of expansive dark energy’ becomes 1 volume of implosive matter: 75%≈25% and the Universe balances as a spring coil in an eternal game of ∞ fractal SHM motions between galaxies.

Without getting into unneeded complex maths, the reader should easily understand the proof of that balanced Universe, once he casts aside his ‘awe’ and ‘respect’ for the ‘high popes’ of science and uses merely reason, why the blunder of ‘cosmological big-bangs’ is a false, half-truth – the key method by which humans ‘invent reality’ to cater their egos – to eliminate and ‘reduce’ the parameters of reality to create a ‘ceteris paribus’ biased theory that cater those egos.
In the case of the big-bang amazing as it will sound to the reader cosmologists eliminate the gravitational forces that bring together vacuum space into the creation of tighter, denser particles, atoms and matter structures within the vortex of galaxies, and through the warping of one-dimensional ‘lines’ of dark entropy≈energy into 3-dimensional ‘tall’ masses, ‘reduce’ the 75% of entropic expansion between galaxies to the 25% of 3-Dimensional mass, establishing a canonical, mathematical equilibrium between expansion of space-time dimensions (expansion of vacuum space) and implosion, akin to the same process happening on a lower quantum scale between attractive matter and repulsive electromagnetic radiation between atoms, towards a thermal equilibrium.
Let us indeed from Hawking, a bad scientist but a good teacher of science, which has no quips recognizing the absurdness of some theories a paragraph that explains this conundrum:
“The trouble with the Hot Big Bang model is the trouble with all cosmology without a theory of initial conditions (MEANING A LIMIT TO THE EQUATIONS): Because general relativity would break down at a singularity, anything could come out of the Big Bang. So why is the universe so homogeneous and isotropic on a large scale yet with local irregularities like galaxies and stars. And why is the universe so close to the dividing line between collapsing again and expanding indefinitely. In order to be as close as we are now the rate of expansion early on had to be chosen fantastically accurately. If the rate of expansion one second after the Big Bang had been less by one part in 10ˆ10, the universe would have collapsed after a few million years. If it had been greater by one part in 10ˆ10, the universe would have been essentially empty after a few million years. In neither case would it have lasted long enough for life to develop. Thus one either has to appeal to the anthropic principle”  (RELIGIOUS concept that miraculously in the whole flow of time we are in a balanced point). Not so IT IS MORE LOGIC TO THINK WE ARE in a balanced eternal Universe as our fractal model describes.
The balance between radiation and mass as a steady state, eternal Universe however is ignored by Big Bang cosmologists as they only recognize as a time-future arrow the entropy between galaxies – the expansion of space.

How dumb is that, when we live as human beings inside the vortex of evolutionary information of a planet, turning around a star vortex turning around a galactic vortex?
So we should NOT care at all for the arrow of entropy, secondary to our existence as biological, and technological beings evolving fast our arrow of information at individual level (process of life and aging, warping, wrinkling into form) and collective level (informative evolution of technological machines, aka meta life) and at planetary level (vortex of evolution of stars and galaxies).
Now for the pedantic scholar of astrophysics who thinks this is too simple, oh, yes, it is – the Universe is simple and not malicious and simplicity is genius (Einstein, Leonardo). So what ‘any scientist’ – not only physicist – tend to do to make his ‘ego shine’ is to include unneeded complications and find secondary details to ‘deny’ the obvious truths we have explained here. We do have in the 4th line section on cosmology, a whole treatise on the 10 most quoted proofs of the big-bangs with equations and quantitative analysis to show ALL OF THEM, fit better when we explain big-bangs as ‘local quasar deaths’ of those galactic vortices, ultimately as all physical systems dual in its implosive and explosive EM arrows expressed in Einstein’s work. Then, all falls right – and in this the details were provided in his latter years by Fred Hoyle, the true genius of Cosmology that rightly considered a ‘fractal series of quasar-big bangs’ in each galaxy, all of them balanced by the entropy between them, with a steady state of continuous creation of matter. Hoyle of course invented as a mockery the term big-bang as an allusion to the worldly job of his main proponent Mr. Gamow, who had worked in the Atomic bomb.

The realpolitiks of power, religion and the military as ‘idol-ogies’ of the big bang
Since the Big Bang became a canonical theory of reality during the Cold War, as a perfect ‘alibi’ for the development of the Nuclear Industry and its accelerators, still at CERN probing to repeat the Nova Big-bangs taking place on the cosmos, as if the risks involved (no more no less than the possible explosion of the planet) were just peccadilloes compared to the new knowledge it should provide on the meaning of it all.  Bottom line is this: the big-bang is an absurdity, a singularity point which fits in the hand of the human scientist containing the entire Universe, never mind how, and then suddenly exploding into infinity, who knows why, with a beginning which IS PURELY A CREATIONIST THEORY, whose earlier proponent in fact, Mr. Lemaitre was a canonical priest. And so physicists thus connected directly as high popes of science with religion and both were happy – Abrahamic religions had found its ‘scientific proof that God created the Universe’ (obviously ‘someone’ must have hold that singularity in its hand, something must existed to cause it).

While Physicists were happier because before they had little prestige as their worldly profession was indeed to make weapons and entropic machines, so all encyclopedia defined physics as the ‘science of motion’ (locomotion), not as the philosophy of science, now wrongly has become. So suddenly the cosmological big-bang as absurd and false as it is, gave the entropic, weapon makers their category as supreme intelligences on planet earth. And of course the military were even happier that Shiva, not Visnu, destruction not organic creation had been the ultimate cause of the Universe… Alas, by researching new bombs as CERN does these days, we were going to answer the meaning of it all.

It had of course the virtue of being simple enough for all people to understand. God created the Universe from an infinitesimal point would say a believer. God created the Universe with a single lineal equation, V=Hod eery resembling the word God, would say the astrophysicist quoting the supposed lineal expansion of the Universe (Hubble’s constant being H here, V speed of locomotion)… And God is just a warrior exploding it all, would confirm the military man on charge of accumulating big-bang-bombs.

Now, the web is being very harsh specially with entropy physicists, ‘kicking the balls of the physical dogma’, because it is really a very religious outlook out there in astrophysicists’ congresses with the big-bang; so if there is the slightest chance for the reader to ‘react’ to his ‘beliefs’ and awe of the high priesthood of big-bang theorists, he has to be confronted right on, with the ‘religious absurdity’ and biased ‘selection of data’, which is also proper of religions. We just have moved from creationist verbal thought (God creates the universe with words, and selects them, to the point it speaks ‘only’ arab in Islam) to mathematical creationist and also a selective one (God creates the universe with maths, and selects only entropic maths:)
If anything astrophysicists are even worse than modern christians which mostly have doubts because they don’t doubt at all. They simply don’t realize they are believers not rational thinkers in what regard time arrows and how the future is webbed by information.
How the brain ‘blinds’ 1/2 of reality to them has a lot to do with the modular, psychological, memorial, repetitive structure of the brain and its ‘lineal perspective’ – the incapacity of huminds to accept multiple points of view, so we must develop also an epistemology of truth and logic which goes beyond the one-dimensional concepts of truth or false and single causality proper of huminds.  Since most humans and most models of science at the larger range (where modeling and speculation is needed not only descriptive details) are filled with traps that disguise beliefs as reason…

Screen Shot 2018-03-10 at 8.37.02 AMWhen we take away dogma and input gravitation and galaxies it is all very simple: what galaxies emit through its black hole axis, is the ‘dark entropy scale’ below the visible c-speed world.
But it is seen NOT as faster than light speed (as time motion) but as ‘enlarged, scattering space’ (as space-distance) carrying away a high speed jet of matter: In its metric equations though is the hyperluminal perpendicular region of the ‘Kerr hole’ axis that stretches the Universe. And fantaphysicists without the proper 5D metric to justify those hyperluminal speeds in the lower scale ‘consider’ a door to another ‘parallel Universe’ (:
But it is compensated by the vacuum condensation into particles on the flat plane of those galaxies. By not measuring this Cosmologists can talk of a single arrow of entropy for the future of the Universe.
It does come then as a huge problem the problem of causality: In the big-bang and the black hole singularity, basically the same equations at work at different scales, theoreticians denied Einstein’s dictum there should be a limiting cut off substance or reality that prevented errors in the theory. 
The laws of Relativity and science don’t break down in the singularity of the big-bang or black hole BECAUSE THERE IS NO SINGULARITY.
Because IT IS NOT expected in Relativity to exist SINGULARITIES, but a dense ‘real source’ and cause for the gravitation:  It is ONLY because mathematicians who ARE not truly aware of physics and its realism, like Hawking and Penrose, are moving backwards equations BEYOND the very same initial conditions that are REAL – in the case of a black hole a frozen star of dense quarks that cause gravitation; in the case of the expansion of space in the Universe the central black holes that eject dark entropy through their axis.

 

∆±¡: EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN ATOMS AND GALAXIES: UNIFICATION EQUATION OF MASSES AND CHARGES.

A fundamental theme of astrophysics in 5D metric is the solution of the Unification equation of charges and masses and the problem of hierarchy – the reader without a professional ‘egocy’ at work as a physicist should be surprised that despite our huge criticism of ‘physicists’ we are so much in loved with ‘physics’; but that is unavoidable, as we shall criticize HUMAN EGOES all the time while stressing the infinite and humble impersonal nature of the Taoist Universe…
Let us then deal with this question a bit more in depth, in the hope that perhaps there is a lot among physicists, who cares more for knowledge than egocy.
The galaxy is the atom of the higher scale, from the ∆o centred human point of view which perceives as much from the galaxy than the atom: ∆±3.
A such the galaxy-atom can be described as a social organism (its highest amount of information), as an astrophysical system, or as an atomic, physical form and all the perspectives will give us ∆i on the being.
As customary we shall apply the simple system of defining 10 set of isomorphic laws related to the fractal scales in space, and space-time symmetries (actions, world cycles) performed by beings on those ∆±3 scales which conform our ‘physical perception’ of the galaxy, expanding it with ‘organic’, and ‘full’ descriptions of it.
And so we can establish 2 fundamental Disomorphisms to study the whole as a series of kaleidoscopic mirrors:
-The atom-galaxy, for quantitative, mathematical physics modelling.
The concept of course has been around for long. EFE (Einstein’s field equations) applied to galaxies (Einstein-Walker formalism) is actually modelled to simplify calculus with galaxies as hydrogen atoms; Schrodinger’s equation was used by Wheeler to find a quantum formalism for the Universe; string duality considers universes and quantum strings the same; astronomers model stars around central black holes as photons, etc. But without a deep philosophical model of the fractal Universe provided in this blog, all those mathematical isomorphisms have been merely considered ‘techniques’ of calculus. The reader thus should be aware the mathematical physics – albeit complex to the level of specialists, do exist and what we shall beyond the Unification equation in Newtonian terms, introduce here is the depth of philosophical analysis and the Disomorphic properties of atomic galaxies.
-The second Ðisomorphism is that of the galaxy-cell (treated in cosmology) which shows the organic properties of astrophysical galaxies. This is to my knowledge completely new stuff, but rather obvious: DNA-black holes with gravitational forces, and protein, lineal strangelets, encase the vital space-time of electromagnetic and gravitational flows of energy between both, which structure the waves of the galaxy. And both control the mitochondria stars that become on the long term the energy food to reproduce more black holes and strange stars (pulsars). 20 years ago this seemed madness, but today everything comes together to the surprise of astronomers to validate the organic model of galactic growth:

What about all the other ‘particles’. They are composed of those, except antiparticles, which have reversed parameters and hence must be considered the dead state of particles, but properly ordered, since the different time dimotions CAN BE ORDERED IN ANY WAY, so in quantum physics the particle-antiparticle anihhilation process should be seen as another way to order the informative life arrow (particle) which lasts much more than the entropic death arrow (§ð<<$t), as death is a travel to the past with NO present. And that is the reason why we see less antiparticles, which is the dead state of a particle, hence much shorter in time.

So as we see less corpses than living, despite being the same number we see less antiparticles.

The simpler mathematical formalism of the Unification of charges and masses as time-space vortices of 2 scales.

Much of the early work on five dimensional space was in an attempt to develop a theory that unifies the four fundamental forces in nature: strong and weak nuclear forces, gravity and electromagnetism. German mathematician Theodor Kaluza and Swedish physicist Oskar Klein independently developed the Kaluza–Klein theory in 1921, which used the fifth dimension to unify gravity with electromagnetic force. Although their approaches were later found to be at least partially inaccurate, the concept provided a basis for further research over the past century. Since they were right – the fifth dimension will unify both forces but in a fractal manner, unbeknownst to physicists.
We shall only so how the power of 5D³ by finding the unification equation of charges and masses (general relativity) and upgrading worldlines to worldcycles (special relativity), as we have already dealt with the constancy of light speed (entanglement of electrons which emit information in relative stillness to each other).
Future, time arrows in physics are cyclical vortices of gravitation or charge or thermodynamic eddies, with a singularity of zero-motion in its center, which we do observe in thermodynamic vortices as we cannot ‘see’ inside a quark or top quark star (black hole). It is the arrow of future, as it is an attractive arrow that forms lineal entropic fields into form and will be the ‘final destiny’ of the quanta of an entropic field. We shall study for the three main scales of the supœrganism of the galaxy, which is the main physical system in which humans exist as its thermodynamic level.
Whereas the Universal Constants (G, Q), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales. Its formalism, M= ω2r3/U.C.(G,Q) is its Unification Equation.
Since if we substitute for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1st ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain Q with a 1040 higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem.
As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It also proves the isomorphism between electromagnetic atoms and galaxies, H-atoms of the cosmic scale. Since when we translate electromagnetic equation into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and electronic orbitals star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos. Organicism gives the ‘why’ of Galacells that have DNA- + Top Quark proton holes, star mitochondria that feed them & strangelet halos.
This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:
Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)2 × radius3/ mass
If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe both, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.
And so we have an essential equivalence between K and G for the two ‘enclosure’ ∆±1 scales of human existence, the quantum faster, stronger attractive curvature=speed of the electromagnetic vortex and the slower G-VORTEX, which allow us to unify as we did previously both fields. And translate the somewhat dull language of electromagnetism to that simpler of gravitation, showing some fascinating results, such as the proton showing the schwartzschild radius, Rg = 2GM/c² equation of a black hole in the larger scale when put on gravitational jargon.
Let us go into the task, of putting some numbers to the conceptual model, completing Einstein’s work with its long seeked…
Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:
Sun mass = 2 × 1030 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10-7 rad. per sec.
Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.
Result: G=6.67 × 10 -11 kg-1 m3 rad. sec.-2
This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.
Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)
4 × 1016 rad. sec. -1 = w (electron);
5.3 × 10-11 m. (Bohr radius);
proton mass = 1.6 × 10 -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×1039 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.
And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/c2.
But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.
To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it. Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:
For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time.

He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.
So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes. This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.

What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow. Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate. Well not so immediate, it requires TO understand first… the inflationary nature of languages of information, which means we can describe all type of single realities with multiple mathematical mirrors, equivalent between them. To illustrate this we shall bring first the case of string theory, which allow us to discuss also what is the limit of the Universe.

IV. EXPERIMENTAL FALSHOOD OF BIG-BANG.

  Cosmic vs. Quasar big-bangs.

So the question we want to find out is which of the two larger scales of big-bangs, that of a quasar big-bang or a cosmic big-bang fits better real data. Since as we can see in the images above, on the right, they are also quite similar in form. In fact they are almost identical.

Now again, the problem IS obvious. On one side both big-bangs fit 5D theory.

As the ‘magic number’ of 1011 elements that conform the next scale happens in both:

– A galaxy would be the equivalent of a neutron beta decay in the atomic scale, of a nova and the remaining Neutron star in the solar scale, hence a ‘hydrogen atom’ or nucleon of the cosmic scale.

– The Universe would be the equivalent of a Neutron or hydrogen atom in the cosmic scale. Most galaxies have 1011 stars. The total mass of all the stars in the Milky Way is estimated to be between 4.6×1010  and 6.43×1010sun masses.

– And the Universe is considered to have around 1.6 1011galaxies.

So the easiest way to settle the question is to state that the galaxy is just a scale below the big-bang (a huge galactic molecule so to speak), as the neutron star is just a scale above the neutron ( a huge neutron molecule so to speak).

And that it exploded in a big bang of the next scale of the universe.

The spatial symmetry of the cosmic big-bang:  

Screen Shot 2016-03-05 at 13.38.40In the graph we can see nicely how beautiful looks in terms of the 5D (anti)symmetric Generator the big bang in time space and scale:

In the graph, the space-time antisymmetry of the cosmic big-bang: the radiation of the original big bang is seen far away in time and space as a wall of fire.

In the graph the representation of the Generator 5D ST of cosmology:

∆-1:Sp(Wall of fire-membrane) ≤≥ ∆-ST(1011 ‘galacells’)≤≥ ∆+1: Tƒ (Human Subjective Observer; ‘Great attractor’ – objective ‘Black hole ≈ Proton’ center).

The graph is an Artist’s logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe, in space, with the topology of all 5D ternary constructs; but alas! an anthropomorphic Universe with:

Tƒ: Objective center, the point where the big-bang started, which should be the ‘proton=black hole locus’ of the original ‘cosmic neutron’ of the ∆+4 scale exploded in the big-bang, or alternately since according to Lorentz Invariance (Relativity) all frames of reference are relative, as indeed any ‘mind’ perceives information in a spatial-still state:

Tƒ- the Solar System at the center, inner and outer planets, Kuiper belt, Oort cloud, Alpha Centauri, Perseus Arm, Milky Way galaxy, Andromeda galaxy, nearby galaxies…

ST: Cosmic Web, as the ‘cytoplasm of the cell-Universe’.

SP: Entropic Cosmic microwave radiation and Big Bang’s invisible plasma on the edge’s membrane.

So you can see, the big bang would further prove 5D physics and the topological ternary structure of all Universal systems.

So we do NOT doubt the cosmic big bang on 5D grounds, but on real data.

Let us then consider a few of such aspects of the big bang, using as usual the Œ=mc2 scientific method, with scanty mathematical formulae, which go on the 4th line in its full power, as one of the great advantages of TŒ is its capacity to explain any phenomena for 4 points of view – the mental, organic, causal, temporal and spatial, mathematical, in a complementary way.

What is wrong with the previous picture/ wouldn’t it be a perfect proof of 5D physics, as nobody has explained what on Earth exploded 13.4 billion years ago?

Yes it would be perfect if data were fully consistent and not subtly bent to cater to the ‘cosmic arrogance of the human ego’ that wants to pack it all on its infinitesimal mind, Ego paradox always present in all actions of all systems of the Universe that perceive in stillness from its mind point of view a selected part of the whole but confuse it with it:

O-mind x ∞ Universe = still mapping (frame of reference)

Now in the graph we see ‘if the big-bang were real’, the spatial symmetry of the Universe, for which there should be action at distance (to create the needed simultaneity, which in all Real Systems connects in a relative quanta of time all the elements of the system, to allow the isotropy and synchronicity required for a ‘whole’ to work as such:

Sp: Wall of fire≤ ST: Dark Energy ≥ Tƒ: Great attractor.

In such hypothetical Universe:

Sp: the wall of fire of the earlier big-bang would be the outer membrane that isolates the ‘cellular Universe’ at z=10.000 c

ST: The faster than light dark energy, v=S/It =Space/Informative Time=S/0-visible information=∞ relative speed for a human observer, with the same z than the wall of fire; filled with Galaxies.

Tƒ: And a hyper black hole ‘great’ attractor (not the anthropocentric graph below), would be the ‘proton->black hole’ of the ∆+4 cosmic scale.

So far so good. But data fits better on little bangs.

Let us then consider just 10 of many factual proofs that the big-bang is a local quasar big-bang and the proper cosmological theory is that of earlier Einstein->Fred Hoyle->5 D Physics, of an infinite, immortal Universe:

  • The Lorentz invariance

Screen Shot 2016-03-11 at 02.33.01

A simple proof that falsifies the cosmic big-bang of the many we shall show here, is the existence of an absolute frame of reference, if the background radiation is global NOT local, as SciAm soon discovered and published in the graph below. In this case the denial of General Relativity and its postulate of no existence of absolute frames of reference in the Universe.

This is called the “Lorentz symmetry”, named for the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz and it is a symmetry of spacetime. It is in fact a cornerstone of Einstein’s special relativity theory. According to special relativity, there is no absolute space or absolute time (as in 5D Physics, which sometimes I call ‘Absolute relativity’. So if two objects are moving relative to each other in empty space, it would actually be impossible for an observer to tell their absolute velocities—maybe only one of the objects was moving and the other was stationary, for example, but you wouldn’t know which was which because their movements are relative to each other, not to any external reference frame.

Alas, but now we do have one: the cosmic radiation, and we are moving within it. So we just have to measure our movement in relationship to the radiation and Relativity is Gone!:

In the graph, the cosmic background radiation acts as a new fixed frame of reference or ether, falsifying Relativity theory, which does not have as its name explains any fixed space-time background frame of reference

Yet since the cosmic big bang is a solution of relativity theory that the cosmic radiation falsifies the very same theory it tries to prove.

Hence by ‘reductio ad absurdum’, the background radiation must be local not to contradict Relativity.

In the graph a cosmic radiation falsifies the cosmic big bang, which it tries to proof.

It is the most obvious logic error in the big-bang cosmology is his falsification of Einstein’s work in which the big-bang theory is based, as scientific American rightly pointed out when the theory was first put forward (to be forgotten as the propaganda machines of military physics, as the meaning of it all pumped up the theory):

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 13.37.30From the CMB data it is seen that the Local Group (the galaxy group that includes the Milky Way galaxy) appears to be moving at 627±22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB) in the direction of galactic longitude, l = 276°±3°, b = 30°±3°.

This motion results in an anisotropy of the data (CMB appearing slightly warmer in the direction of movement than in the opposite direction).

From a theoretical point of view, the existence of a CMB rest frame breaks Lorentz invariance even in empty space far away from any galaxy. So if the big bang is accepted, the theory of which is a solution, Einstein’s relativity based in the non-existence of ETHER, an absolute frame of reference in the Universe (hence ‘relativity name’) is FALSIFIED. Ergo by reductio ad absurdum, the Big bang, which is a solution to the theory it falsifies, is false.

This is one of the many scientific proof of falsity of big bang theory we shall bring in this post, which Cosmologists know and cynically call the ‘axis of evil’ (because it won’t go away and kills their theory right on its inception).

You see what I mean by ‘dogma of religious nature’. How ‘big science’ avoids the axis of evil?

Suppressing data or bringing magic theory to it:  Chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Alas, we are back to Babylon, we must be the center of the Universe, just moving 600 kilometers to the east.

Now after being the devil’s advocate, in the proper way, pointing out the fact, let us consider the fact to be right, because we do respect the scientific method. So we shall consider the Lorentz symmetry to be a local symmetry that only takes place within the galaxy; not in the absolute scale of the Universe.

Now this is the ‘real Universe’ of the next scale of the 5th dimension. It looks on the 4% we see clearly as an atomic network of tissue, which joints the atom-galaxies (think for example of a brain of neurons, of a microscopic colony of unicellular algae, and so on). There is zero isotropy as big-bang cosmologists pretend. All their models being approximations which might look nice on computers but have zero scientific theory-praxis solidity. All what we know is that we are moving towards Virgo; that there is a huge nodal network at Hydra-Centaurus – excellent name; which forms with Pisces-Perseus, a clearly connected network in one of whose filaments we find ourselves.

And that at 46 declination a Great Attractor of dark quark matter, likely a super-black hole of top quark stars is waiting for us in a future rendezvous, as we cruise over a remnant cloud of photonic local radiation that does not seem to be (by lack of attraction power) so interested in becoming dark quark gluon liquid-solid super-state of matter.

That is really all we know. The place we live is Laniakea that means “immeasurable heaven’, even if some arrogant believers think they have measured it.

In that regard, while 5D physics is the ONLY rational theory that can explain a cosmic big-bang (as Time accelerates while space shrinks); 13 billion years does not seem time enough for the immensurable heavens.

This as we shall see this solves momentarily the problem; and allow us to consider ‘theories which do not correspond to Relativity’ beyond the galaxy, a fact which is also essential to 5D Physics, as relativity is considered rightly the theory of light space-time where c-speed/distance is the constant of space of the galaxy, the absolute frame of reference, both rod of measure of static space and motion.

And we will return to that, after we deal with the cosmic big-bang, since it is the first ‘step’ to elucidate to expand physics to the scales of the 5th dimension and harmonize it with all other sciences from where it has so much departed.

  • The quasar cycle

But as an image is worth more than a thousand words, we have just showed you the 3 most recent, visual proofs that the background radiation is local, galactic, and if there was in the past a ‘big-bang’ was just the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang.

So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe…

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 arrows of time. So WHY nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

In the graph we can see some E/c<=>Mc processes of spatial expansion and big-bang destruction of mass, all of which have an inverse temporal, informative, process of much slower creation of temporal information and mass that balances them, in different scales of physical systems, from the beta decay that explodes atoms into electrons and protons (with an inverse slow collapse of electrons into atoms) to the quasar big-bang of galaxies (with an slow process of creation of mass-information from gaseous space):

If we consider the space-time an absolute continuum in a single scale, this more accurate picture of what we perceive is not possible, hence we come to the conclusion of present cosmology – that the Universe will expand and die. If we consider that this expansion is compensated by galaxies, which follow Einstein’s dictum: ‘Time curves space into mass’, Mr. Hogg’s conundrum – how to correct the big-bang is solved.

And so we learn another fundamental truth of Philosophy of Science, which today is often overlooked: we must never deny experimental evidence, even if at first sight it contradicts an established theory.

 For that reason we must accept the fractal informative structure of reality, where the big bang is merely the death-rebirth cycle of a quasar-like galaxy or local Universe, a scale of size above galaxies.

So both together create an immortal Universe of expansive ‘bidimensional sheets’  of flat space we observe the ‘canonical structure’ of…

In the graphs, the scales of the Universe and the human being and its space-time symmetries, which the reader will observe are the same we used to describe the Universe.

Since we are all isomorphic organisms of 5D fractal space-time, and therefore the study of the scales of human beings, biology and history is more important than the study of the scales beyond the limits of human perception, as CERN does, since we are the most perfect super organism of the universe, the measure of all things, including the simpler and less perceived organisms of galaxies and atoms and beyond.

First, we must stress that Cosmology has a huge metaphysical component in its Greek sense – it is well beyond the limits of human perception, which we find to be the atom and the galaxy, beyond and within uncertainty and dark gravitational matter makes knowledge to say the ‘least’ incomplete.

Thus contrary to belief big-bang theories of the Universe and Cosmology in the widest sense do not belong to astro-physics, but still we can do science if we are minimally serious with the scientific method.

Then the cosmic big-bang likely falsehood, as a product of the ego-trips of physicists, follows from the available data on it. It does NOT contradict as we shall see 5D physics. On the contrary it would also validate it. So we are NOT against cosmic big-bang because 5D physics does not tolerate it but because plain good old’ science disproves it.

So we shall give an alternative physical theory of the Universe, which follows closer the T.Œ=Sc3‘ laws of truth of the scientific method (Objectivity, Logic-Linguistic reason, Experimental evidence; Minimalism (Occam’s razor), Correspondence (previous ‘true theories’, parts of the new one), Causal, cyclical predictability and Coherence (logic and mathematical reason).

Thus here we shall on one side prove that the big-bang does not follow all the elements of the T.Œ=Sc3‘ 4 legs of truths  in science (Objectivity, Logic, Evidence, Minimalism=Simplicity, Correspondence with previous theories, Causality & Ternary Complexity:

  • It is a clear creationist theory based in lineal time, two cultural traits of the western Germanic, biblical military cultures that invented it.
  • It is completely illogic and makes no sense at all – for god’s sake indeed, a single point from all was created..
  • It has not enough experimental evidence.
  • But it passes S: simplicity, initially but … when it was merely the drawing back of a lineal equation (H=Dv, Hubble’s red shift equation).  Yet at present as we learned more about the Universe, it requires all kind of ‘epicycles added ad hoc’ to fit the new data (dark matter and energy, accelerated expansion, inflationary first state, etc. So it no longer does fit Minimalism.
  • It does not correspond to physical and logic ‘consistent’ theories but only to religious ones – lineal Christian time and creationism.
  • And finally it lacks Causal cyclical predictability – it does not explain what was before and after; but the element it truly fails is one we normally consider a given for serious science, ‘logic and internal coherence’. It has none. Because indeed it is creationist ‘religious’, as it requires external creators.

 

Moreover, since the big-bang image is mimetic of the previous one it reduces the scale of the big-bang to a quasar scale, making the EFE of Einstein local equations for the Light-space time (reason why it is constant).

In that regard, the big bang scales, that is, the fact that we observer big-bang like death processes of expansion of space 2 planes downwards, as in all other forms of death is one of the strongest proofs of the isomorphic nature of all scales.

In the next graph, from SCiAM, the quasar cycle is longer than the big-bang cycle. Thus by reductio ad absurdum, since we have found galaxies in a ‘second’ quasar cycle, hence over 20 billion years as ‘reborn’ galaxies, forming its central bar, there is no way the time age of the whole is shorter than the time of its parts.

Multiple space-times imply the existence of multiple big-bangs with different explosive size and speeds, all of them deaths of an informative mass or charge that uncoils its accelerated vortex into radiation following Einstein’s equation, E=M(c)2, where a bidimensional or tridimensional vortex (M or e) becomes extended into a plane of radiation (hence the square of lineal c-speed).

Yet for each different scale the parameters of speed (c), mass (M) and Entropy will change. And so we obtain a series of self-similar big bangs described in the graph.

The single cosmic big bang based in a single space-time continuum, was devised even before we knew the existence of a faster than light, gravitational membrane of dark Entropy and dark, quark matter. So we first must define it within that scale of big-bangs as the big-bang of a membrane of electromagnetic radiation; hence a quasar big-bang, not a cosmic big-bang, which will correspond to the much faster explosion of a gravitational membrane, starting at the Planck scale of the gravitational minimal units, the lambda-strings.

This is in a way the conclusion of astrophysicists, which now study the big bang as a dual process, with an inflationary age (the gravitational membrane) and a slower age (the big-bang of electromagnetic space, created over the gravitational membrane).

3.No shadows for the big bang. Ecliptic ‘axis of evil’ and ‘people finding things’.
Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 17.21.14 

In the upper graph:

Physicists have measured a local, hence galactic background radiation, which doesn’t leave shadows from other galaxies and they tabulated the quasar cycle of galaxies, which coincides with the age ascribed in the past to a cosmic big bang. So a more rational theory would consider the cause of the 2.7 K radiation both local in space (galactic) and in time (produced at present); since our measure is local and present.

Now, this is the standard first thought about it: non-thermal radiation from stars.

  • Ad Hoc calculus vs. red shifts. Death of light. Cosmological ‘fractal’ redshirts.

– E x I: Tachyon, Transversal, Gravitational Dark energy waves

Now in what follows we depart from classic cosmology, which as we have seen is good enough to invalidate the cosmic big-bang as a huge lineal ego-trip of astrophysics, and introduce basic concepts of 5D fractal cosmology; which we will develop fully on the 4th line of the blog.

Now the temperature of the background radiation and the radiation itself has alternative theories. My favorite – but not likely correct – is tiredness of light as it falls within 5D physics but it is not mine (which makes it even more objective). My own theory researched during my activism against big-bang experiments on Earth are moon micro-black holes making the halo. Both are far more scientific that the forecasted big-bang temperature. Let us see why, on predictability. Gamow, and the proponent of light tiredness gave predictions ‘before the measure’. Those are:

1946 – George Gamow calculates a temperature of 50 K (assuming a 3-billion year old universe), commenting it “… is in reasonable agreement with the actual temperature of interstellar space”, but does not mention background radiation.

1953 – Erwin Finlay-Freundlich in support of his tired light theory, derives a blackbody temperature for intergalactic space of 2.3K with comment from Max Born suggesting radio astronomy as the arbitrator between expanding and infinite cosmologies.

Freundlich also gave two extreme values of 1.9K and 6.0K in Finlay-Freundlich, E.: 1954, “Red shifts in the spectra of celestial bodies”.

Now the measure was 2.7 K, fully within Finlay’s prediction; completely out of Gamow ‘s prediction. And yet Gamow merely change ad hoc his equations to match the measure, and voila, all physicists which a prior had decided there MUST be a big-bang, ignored Finlay’s.

Now those are the 10 canonical proofs that need no new physics, each of them explained ‘facts’ that the big-bang ‘does NOT explain’ properly. This is more than enough, and while there are a few more, I think 10 is according to the numbers of T.Œ, good enough of fact-known-known proofs.

A timeline will help to understand why it is the likely one by C) cyclical predictability:

1926: Sir Arthur Eddington estimates the non-thermal radiation of starlight in the galaxy has an effective temperature of 3.2 K.

1930s: Erich Regener calculates that the non-thermal spectrum of cosmic rays in the galaxy has an effective temperature of 2.8 K

Thus the thermal radiation calculated by Penzias in 1960 at 3 K had been rightly foreseen by the first people who thought of it (average of 3.2+2.8/2=3k).

On the other hand the late proposal of a cosmic big bang by A-bomb researcher Gamow et al were:

1946: George Gamow estimates a temperature of 50 K.

1949: Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman re-estimate Gamow’s estimate at 28 K.

1960s: Robert Dicke re-re-estimates a MBR (microwave background radiation) temperature of 40 K

These were all offbeat. Only after 1960s measure, busy-busy the cosmic big-bang ‘re-re-re-estimate’ its equations to get ‘a posteriori’ the ‘desired’ experimental results ‘ad hoc’, instead of noting that Mr. Eddington and those proponents of a local background radiation WERE right in their predictions and the cosmic ones totally off-target and hence use the scientific method to deny the cosmic one.

  • Now and here explanations: Moon MACHOs

This AGAIN is a basic proof of truth in science: if WE CAN FIND explanations in present time and here-space, it is absurd to consider an explanation in past or future time and out-of-here space. It is like if we measure your body temperature, at 37 degrees and then a cuckoo physicist tells you the cause is with a lineal past-moving equation that you were born 17 billion years ago at 5 trillion degrees and you are cooling down!! When there is an explanation, in the metabolic activity, now and here of your body.

So what is the metabolic process on the galaxy now that produces that temperature?

Namely the existence of micro-black holes or similar dark matter (strangelets) red-shifting components on the Halo, which account for its mass and the redshirts of all light reflecting or coming through it.

But further on, before we deal with the Halo, there is a huge problem which shows further that it is a local radiation, the so called ‘axis of evil’, which at the cost of billions of $ astrophysicists try to eliminate with zero success. Namely that the radiation aligns with the axis of the galaxy and its equinox, because ‘obviously’ it is produced by the galaxy’s activity.

Do you think this obvious answer has any chance? ha. Quoting the official version, of Wikipedia:

“In particular, the quadrupole and octupole (l = 3) modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with both the ecliptic plane and equinoxes, an alignment sometimes referred to as the axis of evil 🙂

A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data. Recent observations with the Planck telescope, which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, confirm the observation of the axis of evil. Since two different instruments recorded the same anomaly, instrumental error (but not foreground contamination – the way they ‘introduce the local cause – ‘contamination’:) appears to be ruled out.

Coincidence is a possible explanation, chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Now to my hypothesis of a halo of dark, quark matter (black holes or strangelets) acting as a far ‘more limited’, closer membrane distorting by red shift the light reflected or coming through it (as all membranes do transform what penetrates them).

Why, it is a preferred solution? Obvious:

The question posted by the non-shadows experimental fact is that the radiation cannot come from the supposed outer ring of fire (big bang radiation). It does have to come therefore from the internal region of the galaxy, reflected by the Halo, giving us a mirror image of the galaxy, or alternately from outer light, crossing through the galaxy, altered by the Halo ‘strangelet and micro-black hole matter’, strong candidates to for the dark matter of the galaxy. Then obviously what physicists do is merely to extend this Halo-altered radiation into a supposed infinity.

The only alternative object that can produce such radiation in present is a micro-black hole, whose temperature red-shifts light as a gravitational lensing. And since a black hole gravitational lensing is proportional to the mass, we can calculate the mass of those ‘background black holes’, which redshirts light at 2.7 k. Indeed, a simple calculus shows that a black hole of the approximate mass of a moon (the most common galactic object of which each sun has hundreds in its planets and Oort/Kuiper belts, would produce that radiation.

So very likely the halo of dark matter of the galaxy is made of micro-black holes that have eaten moons, as their bigger cousins eat stars. Then they WILL radiate at that exact temperature.

Further on, since black holes are fundamental particles of the upper scale, as protons are in the quantum scale they must be homogeneous in size, even if they eat less perfect planetoids, expelling the ‘left-overs’ as gamma radiation and becoming with other quark stars (strangelets), the ‘protein’ membrane that shields the galaxy, as a st-point whose 3 topologies are latter studied in more detail.

Critical density.

One of the problems of the big-bang (of many) is the critical density. It must be of 10-26 kg per cubic meter for the Universe to be the ‘observed’ flat geometry. But it is not. Only 2 so this is a problem, the big-bang of the cosmos does not match the flat geometry of the Universe and the topic spiral galaxy.

So if the big-bang is a local galactic big bang the critical density of the galaxy should be 10-26; then it would be the quasar big-bang of our galaxy.

Let us do some crunching numbers for a change.

The equation for the critical density is:

ρcrit = 3H02 / 8πG

You can see that the critical density is proportional to the square of the Hubble constant — a faster expansion requires a higher density to overcome the expansion.

How empty is space? Astronomers have learned that the mean density of matter in the universe is within a factor of a few of the critical density. We can calculate ρcrit by inserting the gravitational constant, G = 6.67 × 10-11 Nm2 / kg2, and adopting H0 = 65 km/s/Mpc. We first convert the Hubble constant to metric units, H0 = (65 × 1000) / 3.1 × 10+22 = 2.1 × 10-18s-1. Now we can solve to get ρcrit = 3 × (2.1 × 10-18)2 / 8 × 3.14 × 6.7 × 10-11 = 7.9 × 10-27 kg/m3 ≈ 10-26 kg/m3. This amazingly low density is equal to about five hydrogen atoms per cubic meter, or a single hydrogen atom in a volume the size of the average TV set. However, in that same cubic meter there will be 5 to 10 billion low energy photons of microwave background radiation, the feeble relic of the big bang.

How well does this density match up to the density of large objects in the universe? The typical distance between large galaxies is about 2 Mpc, so we can see what the average density would be if a galaxy like the Milky Way were the only object in a box 2 Mpc across.

The mass of the Milky Way, including dark matter, is about 10+12 M. Sun, or 10+12 × 2 × 10+30 = 2 × 10+42 kg. The volume of a 2 Mpc cube is (2 x 3.1 x 10+22)3 = 2.4 x 10+68 m3. The typical density is therefore mass divided by volume, or 2 × 10+42 / 2.4 x 1068 ≈ 10-26 kg/m3.

Thus we can see that the galaxy density roughly equal to the critical density.

  • The Black Hole reversed equation of the expansion.

While there is not clear understanding of what the ‘Singularity that holds the entire mass of the Universe in an infinitely small point’ due to the ‘absurd’ backwards motion of the Hubble equation in lineal terms till are mote past, there is a clear proof the explosion of a black hole into a quasar will give us the same result:

Since the equations of the big-bang inflationary first age are exactly the same than those of a black hole, reversed inside-out, as the black hole explodes creating in its outer rim a ‘ball of fire’, advancing at enormous speed, through repulsive gravitational waves, till the wave smooth an isomorphic sphere of the size of the galactic outer Halo. Thus there is not mystery to the creation of the region, which will be reborn as a spiral galaxy when the entropic death of the black hole reverses its course, in the following eras.

In the parlance of ‘physicists’, the proper description will be this:

Tƒ say that space expands exponentially means that two inertial observers are moving farther apart with accelerating velocity. In stationary coordinates for one observer, a patch of an inflating universe has the following polar metric:

ds²=-(1-Λr²)dt² + 1/1-Λr² dr² +r²dW²  (where Λ is not the symbol of the 5th dimension but the cosmological constant) We use polar metric because the black hole expands with a positive curvature into a spherical form, following the commonest ‘entropic explosion-death’ of any big-bang material death. In the simplest expression we write: M=e/c² only that we are talking of a tachyon superluminal expansive wave.

This is just like an inside-out black hole metric—it has a zero in the component on a fixed radius sphere called the cosmological horizon. Objects are drawn away from the observer at towards the cosmological horizon, which they cross in a finite proper time. This means that any inhomogeneity are smoothed out, just as any bumps or matter on the surface of a black hole horizon are swallowed and disappear.

Since the space–time metric has no explicit time dependence, once an observer has crossed the cosmological horizon, observers closer in take its place. This process of falling outward and replacement points closer in are always steadily replacing points further out—an exponential expansion of space–time.

This steady-state exponentially expanding space-time is called a de Sitter space, and to sustain it there must be a cosmological constant, a vacuum energy proportional to everywhere. In this case, the equation of state is . The physical conditions from one moment to the next are stable: the rate of expansion, called the Hubble parameter, is nearly constant, and the scale factor of the Universe is proportional to .

Inflation is often called a period of accelerated expansion because the distance between two fixed observers is increasing exponentially (i.e. at an accelerating rate as they move apart), while can stay approximately constant (see deceleration parameter).The -dimensional de Sitter space, denoted dSn, is the Lorentzian manifold analog of an -sphere (with its canonical Riemannian metric); it is maximally symmetric, has constant positive curvature, and is simply connected for at least 3.

  • The Helium problem.

Nucleo-synthesis occurs between 3 minutes and 20 minutes after the (quasar) Big Bang

During the photon epoch the temperature of the universe falls to the point where atomic nuclei can begin to form. Protons (hydrogen ions) and neutrons begin to combine into atomic nuclei in the process of nuclear fusion.

Free neutrons combine with protons to form deuterium. Deuterium rapidly fuses into helium-4. Nucleo-synthesis only lasts for about seventeen minutes, since the temperature and density of the universe has fallen to the point where nuclear fusion cannot continue.

By this time, all neutrons have been incorporated into helium nuclei. This leaves about three times more hydrogen than helium-4 (by mass) and only trace quantities of other light nuclei.

This formation of so much Helium was for very long considered the proof of a cosmic big-bang because stars could not form so much Helium. Then it was found that most of the imbalance was helium accumulated around the central black hole of galaxies; which has not been explained. Obviously because Helium formation happened when the black hole exploded with the big-bang temperature it is found close to the center of galaxies, and it was formed by the quasar explosion. So a galactic big-bang explains both its abundance and its location (the cosmic one does NOT explain its location)

  • The ages of the big-bang.

The ‘cycle of explosions’ of Galaxies into quasars, into galaxies, follows the same ages of the big-bang. As all of them after the initial ‘Planck epoch – of gravitational superluminal waves’, dark epoch of nucleosynthesis, are ages ‘within galaxies’, and so they are proved for the inner space of galaxies. They do NOT explain many other features of the Universe as a whole (which is not isomorphic, etc.) but perfectly describe the evolution and formation of the stars of the galaxy.

So the so-called ages of the big-bang, are properly the ages of the galaxy; WITHOUT all the ‘ad hoc’ theories and pseudo-scientific models required to explain WHY the large scale Universe has NOTHING to do with the supposedly smooth result of a cosmic big-bang (this is like Ptolemy constant recurrence to ‘new’ ad hoc epicycles to make fit new observations into its earth-centric theory of the Universe). Trust me, any astronomer knows how long this ‘list’ is.

Thus the quasar big-bang follows further the laws of truth (minimalism: Occam’s razor), simplicity and correspondence. WE DO NOT NEED to postulate strange forms of dark energy and dark matter, except the ones KNOWN, repulsive gravitation (to account for the entropic expansion of space between galaxies that balances its contraction), which is ‘natural’ to the model of galactic-atoms; and quark matter to account for the dark matter of the halo. Let us consider this second element in more detail.

  • The experimental proof. Earth’s experiments can replicate them

The ages of the ‘big bang’ can be replicated by merely doing the quark gluon soup on the LHC here on Earth. Thus there is zero difficulty for the awesome reversed process of a quasar explosion to create enough quark gluon soup to replicate all those ages. Other matter are the risks of starting a big-bang ice-9 or ‘gas-9’ process (word coined by this author in his suits against CERN for potential genocide: aka, a run-away creation of top quarks and Higgs (its decay scalar mode: Top quark->2H) on planet Earth.

In that regard,. Œ, reclassifies particles, to understand the 3 ‘ages of evolution’ of information represented by the 3 families of mass and quarks, which are also in close symmetry with the upper cosmic scale, the components of the 3 regions of the galaxy:

  • The Top quark star center (black holes MUST be modeled AS real ENTITIES, with a cut-off, ∆-1 ‘cellular substance’ as Einstein wanted. Only Top quarks (Higgs condensates in the parlance of modern physicists) turning faster than c-speed in its internal vortex (hence its enormous attractive mass, which increases with the frequency of its vortex: M=ƒ(h/c2)) have the properties at larger scale of a black hole.

That is, black holes ARE top quark frozen stars, with positive top quarks as their cut off substance.

  • The middle region of up and down light human quarks.
  • The external negative charged, strangelet halo.

Thus the 5D symmetry between the ∆-1 (particle) and ∆+1 (galaxy) limiting scales of astrophysics is obvious and further proof of the symmetries of T.Œ and its ‘correspondence’ and ‘minimalism’ (proofs of truth in science), since it accounts for the first time for the reason why 3 families of particles and 3 families of stars co-exist, and eliminates the need for further theories and particles beyond the standard model:

Since the 3 ages of evolution of mass of increasing form – I, II and III families of quarks are symmetric – to the 3 regions of the galaxy: Top quark black holes, up and down matter , negative strangelet halo

Symmetry between atoms and galaxies (protons positive top quark holes, negative electrons, strangelet halo).

And so once we have falsified ‘reasonably’ the big bang (we could write hundreds of pages on this, but we have to move on), we can now consider 5D physics, on the known-known Island Universe of our galaxy, its generator equation, 3 ‘relative planes ‘of existence, 3 ages of time and 3 organic parts in space.

BUT IF THE BIG-BANG IS NOT COSMIC, BUT LOCAL, THE BIG-BANG OF THE GALAXY? WHY WE GET SO MUCH CONFUSED ABOUT IT?

THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE IF WE CONSIDER THE UNIVERSE A FRACTAL SYSTEM OF SELF-SIMILAR SCALES:

BECAUSE THERE ARE BIG-BANGS IN ALL THOSE SCALES AND IT IS EASY TO CONFUSE THEM. Let us prove it by considering a fascinating theoretical proof: the equation of unification of charges and masses as two self-similar vortices of two scales the atom and the galaxy, and all the big-bangs happening between those 2 scales, to prove you how unimportant is to research any of them as the most important, how preposterous to think we can SEE AND KNOW ALL ABOUT ALL THE SCALES.

And then we shall provide you the barebones of an alternative proper theory of it all, much more complex and enlightening, according to what no doubt will be the ‘future of stience’ in the XXI century if we survive CERN: a proper construction of the Universe with its 3 arrows of time, entropy information and energy and its true fractal, scalar, self-similar structure in space…

$t-LOCOMOTION AS REPRODUCTION OF FORM.

Another important element to fully grasp the galatom model and the Universe as a reproductive fractal is the unresolved question on how things move. The answer stresses the essential reproductive nature of the Universe – since motion  becomes in an scalar cosmos, reproduction of form.

A fundamental question needs to be resolved to make a full swing on the paradigm of science from the study of pure motion (locomotion) to stience (the study of all motions with emphasis in the dominant arrow of reproduction of form, form-in-action, information), in an inverse fashion to classic physics: to define motion also as a fractal form of reproduction, showing then that actually what truly matters is reproduction and locomotion is just one of its expressions.

We have come now to the first principles and defined a particle- point of existence. There is in a place of space-time a spacetime being. What can he do? Travel through the five dimotions of space-time available to him, through a series of ‘sTeps and Stops’, dual STates that will move the being through reality. But as the Universe has at least a step that is a motion in time and a stop that is, a spatial form, (momentum and position in physical jargon, wave and particle, motion and perception), motion now is not that ‘simple’. It is not a continuous game but a stop and go motion as we observe in quantum particles.

Let us consider the simplest of ALL those different motions of the Universe, Locomotion, to realize that if all is motion, and form a mirage of the mind, ALL DIMOTIONS REPRODUCE FORM.

Systems are minds-particles-languages-mappings-heads that stop motion into form, and as such ‘create’ the illusion of space, whose ‘volume’ is the sum of all those present infinitesimal minds thatmove=act in STates of sTeps and Stops, as they go from $tepping motions to §ðopping form. Science knows that. Momentum (motion state) and position, kinetic and potential energy, dualities of steps and stops are all over the place, but only stience explains why.

Feynman’s diagrams: mesons and antiparticles die as entropic, ‘past’ arrows of time

Now Feynman’s genius had an intuitive understanding of this life-death cycle, which in the cyclical equations of 5D merely represents a world cycle of life and death: the arrow of life and information sends you to the future of more informative cyclical speed; then the arrow of death is the big-bang that dissolves your information, in any scale of reality. So in physical particles, the arrow of cyclical information is a vortex of charge or mass, which the arrow of entropy and death converts you into an antiparticle that moves you LOCALLY into your relative past – dissolving the particle into radiation, the human being into its cellular components. It is then IMMEDIATE in 5D that the SMALLER scales in which you dissolve, radiation in E=Mc2 past matter, cells and aminoacids in life death is the past, because the RELATIVE local future, whole being needs first its parts, to appear, its relative local past. Indeed, scales of more complex informative whole are always the arrow of social evolution of future of ‘love’ because they are ‘sustained’, ’emerge’, from the smaller parts, which must exist first hence being its relative past. This is the 5D logic explanation on why the arrow of death and dissolution of information is the past.

What Feynman did is marvelously to have the intuition that the antiparticle was the arrow of relative past that dissolved the particle into its radiation. As physicists use a single TIME arrow for the entire Universe, entering their paradoxes of traveling to the past to kill your father (Hawking), they always got suspicious of Feynman’s past arrow for antiparticles, but they use them anyway. Now, the conundrum is solved by the infinite cyclical time clocks of the Universe, as all those travels to the entropic past are PURELY local, so you never in a fractal organic Universe can go to the past and kill your father, as you will locally kill yourself in the trip, exploding in an entropic big-bang of death. And unless you are ‘viral’, your dying cells won’t go much further.

The strong force therefore is an entropic force, because as Feynman rightly found, in each local world cycle of particles, the antiparticle is the same particle moving backwards in time, which means dying in the entropic process that completes its world cycle (hence living much shorter as the death end of the cycle does happen in a quanta of time). And because entropic-feeding processes are the strongest, most attractive ones in any scale (food is the first cause of most Ðimotions), they carry the maximal energy:

In the graph we see the proper way to perceive the two arrows of time of physical systems, when we plot them together as a cycle-anticycle, even if an antiparticle (which must be considered the ‘3rd’ age and death of the particle) can be observed isolated.

And this leads us to the CPT symmetry, which in 5 Ð physics is absolute but quantized as time cycles are quantized for each species and its 5 Ðimotions=forces and worldcycles, and happen together not in a single plane of ‘light space-time’; but must be considered for the whole 3±I planes whereas the equations of gravitation and relativity with its c-constant speed are the limit of 5Ð for the galactic super organism but do NOT apply beyond (inside black holes and outside galaxies, where the forces are repulsive dark entropy similar to those of electromagnetism between atoms; while inside the galaxy  the forces of gravitation are similar to curved electromagnetism within the Coulomb field  between the electron and the proton, whose ‘5Ð metric’ are parallel to those of the black hole and the strangelet)…

So there is a LOT of self-similarities of scale that would allow future 5 Ð physicists once the model r=evolution is accepted and the present dogmas put in doubt to complete by self-similarity the true nature of black hole stars (which rightly Einstein told us to be frozen stars), to understand the processes of renormalization (which add scalar infinities that must be cut off, including the SINGULARITY OF THE BLACK HOLE AND THE BIG-BANG).

The solution of the antimatter-matter symmetry and the hierarchy problem.

It is then obvious that this much more realist view of black holes and big bangs solve almost every problem of present physics as we explain in the 5D section of the scalar Universe. For example, the hierarchy problem of quantum gravity is simple: because cosmological masses are much larger, with less curvature and slower time cycles, they attract far less than charges. And in fact, if we accelerate them as we reduce their size in equal proportions, by a 10ˆ40 factor the G constant becomes the q constant and gravitation becomes as powerful. We can then say that in terms of scales, the galaxy is an atom, the black hole is a proton, the quark is a gluon, and the symmetry between the 3 scales of matter, black holes, quarks and gluons is the proper way to study all those scales – a theme that runs for a century in physics, since Kaluza-Klein used it in the first models of 5D physics to unify indeed G and Q, which I obtained also by slightly similar means, as shown in the 5D section.

On the other hand, the matter-antimatter symmetry is obvious if each matter is antimatter in its big-bang entropic death, the symmetry is that between living and dying people: we see less dying people because death lasts only a quanta of time. But there is another interesting proof of the model of quark black holes and the symmetry of the 3 scales, top quarks and heavy dark atoms devouring mesons of our light Universe as our light Ud quarks devour gluons of the next, lower scale, found by the very same CERN, which is now in the news everywhere as the key discovery that proves  the quark matter nature of black holes and quasars ejection of matter in larger amounts that antimatter:

home.cern
The LHCb experiment has found hints of what could be a new piece of the jigsaw puzzle of the missing antimatter in our universe. They have found tantalising evidence of a phenomenon dubbed charge-parity (CP) violation in particles known as baryons – a family of particles whose best-known members are the protons and neutrons that make up all …
It seems Bottom quarks, the main components of BCB black atoms decay into protons 20% than in antiprotons, So if we COULD FIND a massive process of decay of Bottoms in the Universe this would explain why there is more matter – a 20% more is created, the rest annihilate with the 80% of antimatter.
The problem they have at CERN after the initial excitement is that as all matter comes from the Big Bang singularity, and Black holes are not BLACK STARS with BCB atoms and tops, there is NOWHERE they can find Bottom decay in massive numbers. So the news after initial enthusiasm became short of an oddity. Because they HAVE no enough Bottoms.
But IF black holes are BLACK stars made of BCB atoms, with a central top quark singularity – that is Kerr-Newmann charged black holes in the center, with its superluminal axis, THEY ARE THE SOURCE of matter, when the galactic quasar ejects massive quantities of matter through the central axis, and its synchrotron-like magnetic fields, observed in all the jets of quasars, origin of most new irregular galaxies (baby galaxies of the Universe):
Now if  black holes are ‘black stars’ of the top quark decuplet (tops, bottoms and charms), the BCB is a heavy atom as the udu of our world. So they decay into our particle world, in a series of jets of local galactic little-bangs (quasars, blazars), whereas the BG radiation is also local redshift of ‘MOON machos’ (heavy quarks structures that radiate it after eating a moon – as that size gives us the exact spectra of a black body, red shifted radiation at 2.7k).
While the big-bang age, mimics the galactic central black hole age, whose life worldcycle has been measured in 20 billion years…
All this means that the creation of matter is really a series of local big-bangs (this was Fred Hoyle’s theory of multiple quasar big-bangs)…
So IF THE BIG-BANGS ARE LOCAL ejections of matter by the ‘dark atoms, bcb’ of the black hole, the 20% of higher production of protons in the decay of the black atom (BCB) what this idiots sorry ‘expert’s (: call the ∆º particle is the first sign that all the matter of the UNIVERSE comes from the ‘ejection of matter’ by quark stars aka central black holes in quasars and blazars,   (∆º is a BUD particle, as they have not yet enough energy to make a BCB but what matters it the B decaing in protons not antiprotons)
So voila, 20% of PROTONs DO NOT annihilate with antiprotons.. and we have SOLVED both the question fo matter-antimatter, proved that black holes are black stars, and proved Fred Hoyle’s quasar big-bang theroy…  slightly changed with the tools of 5D astronomy – all those symmetries of scale between atoms and galaxies, black holes as protons of the larger scales,gluons as quarks of the lower scale, the octect of gluons being the octect of mesons, etc. etc.
Now the metric of those dark stars is fairly straight and resolved, including some work by Penrose’s father, Sir Roger, and Hawking – give to caesar what belongs to caesar, with its Penrose’s engine of expulsion of matter, both from the accreting region of the black hole and the central superluminal axis of the charged rotary Kerr-newmann black hole.
And this means also the validity of Einsteins’ principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, as the heaviest top quarks by the law of any vortex beyond the c-speed event horizon both in the black hole and as the individual elements of its center, must speed up at hyperluminal speeds, hence can eject matter escaping the black hole: 

It is likely that the rotation of those top quarks is hyperluminal, as only hyperluminal rotation, if mass is a vortex that accelerates inward with lesser radius, as a skater does ( Vo Ro = K) can give them such huge mass.

This is observed in all galaxies where massive jets at 10 c come out of black holes. And it is observed even in the spin of particles that have to be hyperluminal under the vortex law generalized with the scalar 5D metric of the graph, for the magnetic field they create – something Pauii already noticed in his spin theory.

So why physicists do not accept once and for all such models, including the fact that ‘outside’ the spacetime filled with light, faster than light speeds can happen? I wonder… since nothing forbid them in physics.

There is NOT in relativity any limit of speed. Einstein only said that c is constant and hyperluminal speeds require negative mass.

So because physicists do NOT know what mass is they have the taboo because they DON’T understand negative mass, which is silly since IN TIME ‘negative’ as Gauss explained calling negative roots inverse numbers, means only an ‘inverse direction’ of motion. So for example ‘negative divergence’ means implosive motion, negative potential the same implosive motion for mass and charge.

WHAT IS IMPOSSIBLE is negative space/forms (negative apples) but in TIME i repeat, negative means an inverse motion. So if Mass is an accelerated inward motion by the Principle of equivalence, the negative mass of Einstein’s equation that a faster than light rotary system has means ONLY an explosive entropic divergence, of the space-time vortex of mass. So this simple acceptance of mass as a vortex, according to Einstein’s equivalence principle also explains antiparticles’ negative time, etc.

So goes for negative energy, which means merely an entropic explosion. For example in e=mc2, the e is inverse to the m, as a negative entropic explosion of mass that becomes entropy radiation.

So entropy is the negative of mass as a vortex whose form carries the information of the Universe and that only means that at c-speed the mass explodes. Ok. Those are concepts of information theory, which is the basis of my work on 5D, but physicists should really learn some of those concepts. Yet even if you are not interested in the scalar Universe, the symmetry of black stars and light stars still holds and it is evident.

Physicists in that sense also don’t understand how time comes to zero in those equations. It means time – motion reaches a 0 position or a balance between implosive and explosive motion in the event horizon turning at c-speed, neither exploding or imploding – not that the singularity is infinite and infinitely unreachable, as proved by muon experiments, which do not stop but slow down its spin-motions, the internal clocks of its ‘life-duration. IT IS the INTERNAL TIME of the spins and mass clocks what slows down to a halt, as when YOU die off, stopping the internal clocks of the system.

SO NO PROBLEM with faster than light c-speeds, it is just A QUESTION OF UNDERSTANDING ALGEBRA in terms of the complex laws of information of the universe.

On the other hand, back to our star-planet reality, small black holes have not enough density to create top quark stars and so they are neutral bcb atoms of bottom-charm quarks equivalent to our stars. Only giant central galactic black holes resemble the strange neutron stars with a cover of ‘normal iron atoms and a core of strangelet’, in this case a cover of normal ‘bcb dark heavy atoms’ and the center of a quasi-infinite rotating speeds of ultramassive top quarks. Small consolation: we shall become a dark atom star, neutral, unnoticed, of 3 cm.

This simple model of quantum gravity, according to the known known Dirac-Maxwell and EFE equations proved together, backed besides by experimental proofs of rotary black holes and galaxies in which the halo is strongly attracted by the center all over the Universe is the work I did in 5D that now has been published in its basic assumptions at arxiv.org and will I guess have a continuation in new papers, now that Hawking cannot impose its celebrity status, not to discuss what real black holes are:

That is, Quark stars – THEORETICALLY SOUND merging THE 3 KEY EQUATIONS OF PHYSICS, EXPERIMENTALLY SOUND – A MASSIVE rotating accelerator transforming quarks in layers of heavier quarks as LHC does.

Then in the galactic version this massive positive charge creates a massive outer-galactic magnetic field trapping the outer halo of strangelets, and creating the attractive tension of the so called dark matter.

Back to the metric equation at the beginning of this paragraph, which was modeled as a fluid even then, since the fluid is assumed to be at rest at t = 0, this can only be if it is a rotational fluid, with small CYCLICAL MOTIONS INSIDE, which are precisely the mass vortices of those quarks. We have a homology on our thermodynamic scale where fluid eddies form a series of fractal little vortices inside; in black holes will be small space-time vortices which is what particles are (last graph). So the dark star model is consistent with Einstein fields equations, which in fact give for that inner region of black holes the parametric equation of a cycloid – THAT is a particle turning around the eddie of mass. as the small rotary eddies do inside a larger ‘tornado’.

So there is never a zero radius-singularity. The more so since Pauli exclusion principle implies particles cannot occupy the same position so a black hole made of quarks cannot have a singularity.

For the singularity to happen Oppenheimer thus had to made more ‘assumptions’ out of the hat: that is dust not particles, that the scale factor R(t) vanishes; that the black hole is a fluid… that it has a uniform density having the initial value rho (0) – because it is made of ‘dust’ not of matter, when precisely it is the opposite, ultradense… and also that it has zero pressure (that is, it has no particles reacting and evolving, producing radiation outwards, also stupid, specially if they have top quark positive charges in the center that will produce an immense electromagnetic pressure radiation as our stars do with negative electron pressure radiation)…

All that are completely absurd assumptions. Only then the black star collapses from rest to a point in 3-subspace of infinite curvature and zero proper volume, in a finite time t. Then he gets the final collapsed state of infinite  energy density. And of course we cannot prove this experimentally wrong just because the center of the black hole is a region we have no direct evidence off; so we need the homologic method of 5Ð scales of matter to make it symmetric to normal stars but with heavy atoms of the top quark decuplet as we did.

A FORMAL PROOF OF THE SCALES OF THE UNIVERSE:

 

Connecting knots: De Broglie, mass, frequency and time and energy dilation

But this is NOT the internal property of mass, which is a vortex of accelerated gravitational time, E=mc2+E=hƒ->M=ƒ(K).

We shall latter a more detailed analysis on the first concepts of quantum physics and its relationship with 5D, physics around those 2 Einstein equations and De Broglie’ interpretations of it, as he found that all physical ‘quanta’ had a body-wave and a head-particle as they move over an energy field:

Sp (lineal field) < ST – wave < Spherical Particle of information.

And so he wrote: λ x P (mv) = H (Planckton)

Written in 5D as Vs. (Sp-field) > l (ST-wave) > m (Tƒ) = H

But while this is now standard 1st course of physics, what is of interest in De Broglie original paper is its disquisitions about the difference between the wave internal clock and the particle clock, as he focused on the ‘time element’ of E=Hv, and how time changed its clock slowing down as the wave-particle increased its speed-length in the 5th dimension, by a proportion, which we should now remark is equal to Einstein’s increase of energy of the system in Special relativity, such as, if we consider that an increase in the speed of the wave is in fact a growth of the wave space-distance: ∆ L = -∆Tƒ x ∆ Es =K,

Scales are similar NOT equal.

It is important to notice though that the Universe of 5D planes is fractal, ruled by the 3rd postulate of ®, of similarity not equality, as fractals are not equal in scales, but similar with internal parts that might differ even if the outside form of the point seems equal to an external observer.

Thus self-similarity is not equality, an atom is self-similar to a galaxy but NOT likely a galaxy – reason why for example quantum cosmology, which models galaxies as atoms (albeit without the conceptual 5D understanding) does not give us exact results.

Quantum cosmologists consider by using exactly the same equations (in their ad hoc method with no conceptual reasoning) ‘identical’ the scales of the cosmos and the quantum world, so they use quantum equations for all. This is a hyperbolic error. We have equations for each scale and what we can show, as we did here, is the self-similarities of scales.

All in all, it is evident that what we call a black hole or pulsar is made of quark quanta; it is a fractal of quarks. Thus we can apply to its vortices the laws of Newtonian fluids or the more complex equations of a Non-Euclidean vortices of space-time, as we do with any other ‘medium’ called a ‘phase space’ in physics. They can be considered akin to a hurricane, which is a ‘medium’ of air molecules, or to a tornado, which is a medium of water molecules. All those mediums have limits of speed, which are the same for their lineal forces and cyclical vortices:

Light space-time has a c-speed limit, which is also the limit of speed of a rotational electron vortex and a 0 K limit.

Dark energy and quark matter belonging to the gravitational membrane seems to have a c<10 c lineal and rotational speeds.

Because each space-time membrane has vortices of information and energetic, lineal forces, we need equations of self-similarity, relating informative vortices of charges and masses on one side and gravitational and electromagnetic waves on the other. This is done with gravito-magnetism, which relates cosmic gravitational, lineal waves and electro-magnetic fields. So, the gravito-magnetic formalism just needs to be properly fit within the wider concept of 2 self-similar fractal space-times, to define in self-similar terms, light waves and dark-energy waves of gravitation; as the elementary, actions-units of the 2 fractal scales.

Needless to say if a proton is a black hole of the inferior scale, a black hole is a quark condensate. And measures give us black holes as ‘top quark condensates’.

Needless to say, the philosophical conundrum of the self-similarity of forces and forms on both scales cannot be solved experimentally. If the Universe is self-similar between those 2 scales, but those are the limits of scales of reality, there is nothing below the atom or over the galaxy. If the Universe is infinite in its scales we are nothing to the whole. And yet while the first answer pleases our ‘anthropocentric world view’, the second answer is far more logical and in accordance with the evolution of science and thought.

It would then mean that the Universe is absolutely relative. That is, reality is not only as General Relativity proved, relative in all its motions, which depending on the observer might be seen as motion or as stillness (so Galileo found the Earth moves but we see it still), but it would be also absolutely relative in scales.

Which form together the 5th dimension of the Universe. This fifth dimension in which science has worked since the first telescopes and microscopes opened it to our eyes, however has not been understood in logic terms at all beyond the beginning represented by Einstein, on my view by a lack of philosophical and logical depth in the work of physicists. 

We deal here, when talking of the fifth dimension with a concept that should have been obvious: if physics study in general relativity time as space, in a present slice, the total time includes a flow from past to future, and from the microcosms to the future evolution of more complex structures, from smaller to bigger scales – and those dimensions, the past, already evolved flows of time that created scales from the micro-quantum world to the macro-gravitational world, are the 5th and 6th dimension which physics does not study but must be understood to evolve science.

General relativity studies the ‘present, continuum space-time’ (hence spatializes time to gain precision in the measure by creating a simultaneous frame of reference). And Absolute relativity is the next step expanding the study of time with both, logic and geometric, topological, mathematical non-Euclidean tools.

I recall the only time I could give a conference on that unification at Sonoma’s 50 anniversary of Systems Sciences, in which many top physicists were present.

They were first in awe that such simple equations as a 3 dimensional vortex could unify and extract the never found theoretical result of G and Q (we have only empirical measures), solve the hierarchy problem and further on as I develop a bit more the gravitational ‘jargon’ of charges, prove that the Proton radius was equal to the black hole radius so an atom was self-similar to a galaxy and the scales of the Universe were infinite through the 5th dimension.

Then someone raised his hand and told me what Hilbert told to Einstein when we published special relativity: the mathematics is too simple (Hilbert quipped that they were at the level of an undergraduate), and the enthusiasm waned. Within months NY Times published in its Sunday magazine a cover with my suit to the Nuclear Industry and that killed my career with ad hominem so I loss all my scholar positions and never gave more master conferences…

But that is another story of the limits of ethics in science. What matters here is to realize of the multiplicity aroused by the 4 pillars of all descriptions of reality. And the Occam’s razor: simpler is better.

The strong principle of equivalence:  mass as a vortex of gravitational time.

Mass is the attractive, in/forming force of the Universe; and it is merely the last, accelerated, curved motion of the gravitational force. Einstein explained this with his principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass/gravitation. Initially, due to the ‘mirage’ of materialism, physicists thought the principle only applied to the external, curving vortex of gravitational forces that sunk into the mass. But the mass as a solid substance was never found and all pictures have seen merely vortices of curved motions.

Now we can explain all this and take further, conceptually and mathematically the discoveries of Einstein, thanks to the advances of complexity. In this post we shall deal at the simplest possible level with empirical, theoretical and mathematical demonstrations of those concepts, considering some of the new advances on theory of information and astro-physics, we are making departing from Einstein’s insight.

Einstein’s mass theory 

In Physics, according to Einstein the information of a particle is its mass. This can be easily proved theoretically, mathematically and empirically.

In the previous pictures there is an obvious empirical proof. All pictures of masses and charges appear as vortices with an accelerated inward motion. Let us now deal with the other proofs (and let us remember that truth in epistemology of science is based in 3 pillars – empirical, logical and mathematical proofs.

Einstein’s Conceptual proof.

Now this simple equation is in accordance with Einstein’s Principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitational force. Both are the same in General Relativity. And so why we should stop this ‘comparison’ at a certain point of the accelerating vortex? Since in the Universe we have never seen ‘substance’ but only motions, it is logic to think that what we call a mass is exactly that: the final region of acceleration into a vortex of gravitational forces. Such vortex obviously offers a resistance to motion (inertial mass), which is dependent of the speed/acceleration of such motion.

Einstein’s Mathematical proof

The mathematical proof is simple, given by the 2 main equations of Einstein, which relate the frequency of information (a time parameter), the mass and the energy of physical systems:

ExT=K, E=Mc2, hence M=K/T=Kv; where v is the frequency of rotation of the vortex of mass.

Thus a mass is a vortex of space-time that carries the information of the Universe in its frequency.

This also has empirical proofs: All vortices attract inwards with a force equivalent to the strength of the rotating vortex. So a hurricane attracts more when it turns faster. And so a mass, which is a hurricane of space-time attracts more the faster it turns. Moreover vortices of all kind are ‘accelerating’ inwards: Vo x Ro = K, which means that the shorter the radius is, Ro, the faster its speed, Vo, so the closer you come to the vortex, the faster it turns, the more it attracts, the stronger its gravitational force is, and the more mass it has.

But what type of accelerated motion?  Well it turns out that there are only two accelerated motions, lineal and cyclical accelerations. Further on, accelerated motions can produce forces that ‘work’. And Newton gave us a simple equation to describe ‘all’ the forces of the Universe: F = M (cyclical acceleration) x A (lineal acceleration). This is fascinating because it means that the Universe is made of 2 accelerated motions: F = M x A, where A is lineal acceleration or ‘energy’ and Mass is a vortex with more dimensional form, or cyclical acceleration, whose form and frequency carry the in-form-ation of the Universe.

Of course when we enter into deeper analysis of the mathematical details, a mass vortex is more complex. Einstein described it with a set of equations that go beyond the scope of this introduction. But there is a different version of those equations much simpler – the gravito-magnetic version, recently proved experimentally by a Probe, which are mimetic from the equations of electromagnetism.

And so since charges are obvious accelerated vortices of electromagnetic forces, it is self-evident that if masses produce a self-similar field system, they will be accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.

As Einstein put it ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’. And so there you have, the 3 simplest, more important equations of Physics, F=m a, E=Mc2, E=hv and then the more complex, equally essential Maxwell and Einstein’s equations come all together to accept mass as an ‘internal’ property that define mass and hence need no further fields and esoteric particles to be explained.

Some extra-ordinary solutions obtained with Mr. Einstein’s Principle of Strong Equivalence.

So we return to objective science and bring different perspectives to explain basic physical phenomena, and the simpler answers unlike the Germanic view are considered the more harmonic and larger truth: such as why certain particles like a black hole have more mass, while others like a photon have no mass?

It is really because particles are ‘prescient’ and foresee the arrival of a celebrity (they are also conscious) coming to it, distinguishing them? Or something more objective, physical and normal; as the Higgs interpretation for common consume would believe? Not, obvious. The Answer is because its vortex of time is faster.

Of course something more normal when we describe a mass as an accelerated vortex, whose frequency of rotation gives us like in a hurricane its speed and strength and attractive power. Then all the questions still unknown about mass and energy become solved:

– First, why and how energy becomes mass in that equation, E=Mc2. This is simple Energy is lineal acceleration, mass is cyclical acceleration, thus a mere topological change of the form of motion transforms one into the other. The Universe is eternal, made of motions. And so one becomes the other in the c-limit speed of our space-time membrane.

– Then why antiparticles have inverse time coordinates? Self-evident: they are time vortex that turns clock wards.

– Then, why black holes attract so much being so small? Obvious. The event horizon is the c-limit of speed that curves light into mass. So they turn at c-speed, and they are very small. Thus the frequency of its mass-cycle that is proportional to its speed and inverse to its length is the maximal possible in the Universe.

– So why light has no mass? A tautology: Light does not close a cycle, but it is a wave that deflects the cycle into an open wave. Hence it never has mass. But if we were to calculate its mass in terms of energy the higher the frequency of the web (analogous to the mass frequency) the more mass-energy it has.

– Then there is the scalar, fractal structure derived of the homology of the equations of charges and masses, which however exist in two different scales. This is a key discovery for the fractal structure of the Universe and proves one of my fundamental mathematical findings: the unification equation of the G and Ke Universal constants of charges and masses as two vortices of two fractal discontinuous scales of space-time, the quantum, smaller world and cosmic upper scale.

And we will return to that at the end of this article, when considering in depth the consequences of upholding and evolving Einstein’s theory of mass, instead of seeking and absurd scalar particle that explains so little…

– Finally, why the Universe accelerates between galaxies? It is accelerating and will end into pure entropy? No. Self-evident. Physicists ignore the meaning of information and mass and they have a continuous theory of space. None of that works anymore. As each time cycle ‘breaks’ space into an inner and outer region. So do the time cycles of the Universe of which the biggest clock is a galaxy that ‘warps space into time-mass’. So the acceleration of space between galaxies is balanced by its warping within them.

And both balance each other: gravitation informs light-space into mass vortices, galaxies. And then light-space the substance of which our space is made, once it abandons the galaxy, stretches his frequency (Doppler effect as ‘real’) till its ‘generational time cycle’ of around 10 up to 10 years dissolves it back into non-perceivable, lineal, gravitation with no form. But this and so many other fascinating results of a proper theory of time cycles require more knowledge of physics that I expect a non-physicists to have, so we shall end here the simpler version of Einstein’s mass theory.

 

CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES

One element often disregarded in the religion of the big bang is how many sacred principles of physics are ‘destroyed’ by this paradigm, essentially all of them, but the most important perhaps is the conservation principles of energy, momentum, (lineal and rotational), baryon number and charge, all of them are respected in the Galatom model. Let us comment them.

Universal constants and conservation principles at scale.

Physics as defined classically is the study of the motions of beings. As it has been reduced to locomotions, there is so much work to do… in the foundations and philosophy of physics, as well as its translation to spacetime stience. But knowing the Universe as a whole and its 5 dimotions makes the task easier…It all comes to study and measure the steps and stop states of the spacetime organism: Stop-Step gives us an œ-quantifiable ‘feed-back’ S-form/T-motion minimal unit patterns to study quantitatively entities as ‘physical beings’.

We can call this speed of STep-STop, Wave-Particle STates (solid-gas) different in each scale of physics but always obeying the same laws, the essential element to measure in physics, normally through ‘wave-lengths’ and ‘frequencies’ of motion 

 

VII. DARK WORLD: BEYOND THE GALAXY 

 

 

Specifically in the Light space-time ‘galatom superorganism’ in which humans co-exist, all systems have a speed of reproduction of information of c-speed above which all the other planes of light exist¡ence happen. So as the system becomes more complex its motion implies the reproduction of multiple layers of being, in adjacent ‘wave-like’ states of reproduction of information.

THE C-speed constant is the constant of reproduction of information or 5 D constant metric of the galaxy: $xð = C, as such all species within the galaxy have that maximal speed of reproduction of information, spent in the recreation of the mass-energy of the being that reduces the speed from the simplest information reproduced, light itself. But the nested Universe implies that the ¡±4 plane of the Universe must have a constant of speed (of reproduction) higher than its smaller ¡-3 galatom, hence c-speed is not the limit of speed outside the galaxy of dark entropy faster than c confused with an expansion of distance-space

In the graph one of the clearest proofs of Human ego, which makes scientist to belief first their mind-mirror-languages, models and theories above experimental truths and facts, even in the case of physicists that say to revere the experimental method is the denial of the ginormous number of facts that prove that ‘outside the open ball’ of the galatom, in the lower ¡-4 plane of particle-points (quantum scale) and waves (quantum potential)  and the outer i+4 plane of black holes (gravitational scale), systems go faster than light, for lack of a better model (obviously this is a fact consequence of 5D metric, as smaller time clocks run faster, so all vortices accelerate inwards). A few ‘sanguine’ cases:

  • The spin of particles creates a magnetic momentum that CANNOT be explained unless particles rotate faster than light. So they do rotate faster than light, which explains also why we only see certain spin positions in the constant stop and motion duality: when they move they do faster than light and we don’t see its motion. So we only see its stopping positions.
  • Black holes are gravitational vortices with c-speed in the event horizon, so they must keep accelerating and finally through its axis expel energy and matter at faster than light speeds, proved by galactic jets that reach (graph right) up to 10 c speeds.
  • The realist quantum potential of Bohm-Broglie interpretation of physics is non-local and non-locality, meaning (faster than light speeds) is essential to the proved entanglement processes.
  • Non-locality is also clear in gravitational fields at astronomical level.
  • The expansion of space between galaxies if considered a motion (time view of space distances) is a faster than light speed.

All in all we can resume those 5D metric that explain faster than c-speed in both extremes of our galactic world: when we get into particles and its internal ‘minimal radius’ of rotation – the spin – we cross to faster than light speeds. So happens in the other extreme of wave-states, when a wave ‘enlarges’: Rotating waves spin faster at greater radii and at some point go faster than the speed of light.  That is the premise of the Rotating Wave. It resolves a lot of things that would otherwise look weird.

Beyond all that, there is probably more layers of underlying reality that go even much faster than zitterbewegung (zitter for short) which is a billion billion times a second. Why stop here?

All those processes though happen NOT within the galaxy as its space-time IS light (background radiation) and so, obviously nothing can go faster than light in a Universe in which the minimal unit of reproduction of information (a light wave) goes at c-speed, since ALL other forms of the galaxy are evolutions of this information. And so as more information must be reproduced it takes longer to reproduce it in adjacent space, which is the way motion as a reproduction of information takes place:

The fastest form is the one that must reproduce less information, life itself, all other particles, atoms and atomic configurations are slower.

In the graph, the larger superorganism of the galaxy is the universe, and as such its limit of c-speed reproduction must be only the limit of the Universe of forms evolved from the primary simplest $t state of light-waves, reproducing its frequency=color and 3 dimotions of electric height-information, wide magnetic energy and c-reproductive speed.

The Universe however is not perceivable but both at quantum potential level (Bohm’s realist interpretation) and beyond the galaxy in the phenomena perceived as acceleration of space between galaxies exxpands the capacity to reproduce information AS a larger superorganism will NEED a larger c-speed of reproduction for the system to be able to create instantaneous, simultaneous, organic networks within its-elf.

The conclusion is obvious: the galaxy atom is the ‘solid’ last scale above and below perceived from the ∆º humind, at i=±3, the scale of perception of forces as pure motion or pure form in the limits of our ‘being’.

The Higgs field

More speculatively, the Higgs field has also been proposed as the energy of the vacuum, which at the extreme energies of the first moments of the Big Bang caused the universe to be a kind of featureless symmetry of undifferentiated extremely high energy. In this kind of speculation, the single unified field of a Grand Unified Theory is identified as (or modeled upon) the Higgs field, and it is through successive symmetry breakings of the Higgs field or some similar field at phase transitions that the present universe’s known forces and fields arise.

The relationship (if any) between the Higgs field and the presently observed vacuum energy density of the universe has also come under scientific study. As observed, the present vacuum energy density is extremely close to zero, but the energy density expected from the Higgs field, supersymmetry, and other current theories are typically many orders of magnitude larger. It is unclear how these should be reconciled. This cosmological constant problem remains a further major unanswered problem in physics

.”All the matter particles are spin 1/2 fermions. All the force carriers are spin 1 bosons. Higgs particles are spin-0 bosons (scalars). The Higgs is neither matter nor force. The Higgs is just different.

There has been considerable scientific research on possible links between the Higgs field and the inflaton – a hypothetical field suggested as the explanation for the expansion of space during the first fraction of a second of the universe (known as the “inflationary epoch”). Some theories suggest that a fundamental scalar field might be responsible for this phenomenon; the Higgs field is such a field and therefore has led to papers analyzing whether it could also be the inflaton responsible for this exponential expansion of the universe during the Big Bang.

Such theories are highly tentative and face significant problems related to unitarity, but may be viable if combined with additional features such as large non-minimal coupling, a Brans–Dicke scalar, or other “new” physics, and have received treatments suggesting that Higgs inflation models are still of interest theoretically. 

Theoretical need for the Higgs.

Gauge invariance is an important property of modern particle theories such as the Standard Model, partly due to its success in other areas of fundamental physics such as electromagnetism and the strong interaction (quantum chromodynamics). However, there were great difficulties in developing gauge theories for the weak nuclear force or a possible unified electroweak interaction. Fermions with a mass term would violate gauge symmetry and therefore cannot be gauge invariant. (This can be seen by examining the Dirac Lagrangian for a fermion in terms of left and right handed components; we find none of the spin-half particles could ever flip helicity as required for mass, so they must be massless.)

W and Z bosons are observed to have mass, but a boson mass term contains terms, which clearly depend on the choice of gauge and therefore these masses too cannot be gauge invariant. Therefore it seems that none of the standard model fermions or bosons could “begin” with mass as an inbuilt property except by abandoning gauge invariance. If gauge invariance were to be retained, then these particles had to be acquiring their mass by some other mechanism or interaction.

Additionally, whatever was giving these particles their mass, had to not “break” gauge invariance as the basis for other parts of the theories where it worked well, and had to not require or predict unexpected massless particles and long-range forces (seemingly an inevitable consequence of Goldstone’s theorem) which did not actually seem to exist in nature.

In the Standard Model, the mass term arising from the Dirac Lagrangian for any fermion is THE PRODUCT OF THE PARTICLE-ANTIPARTICLE SYMMETRY.

Now in 5D physics, this is the MOMENT OF DEATH of a particle, when it BECOMES ‘PAST-MASS’, and so it emerges into the larger social whole.

It is a completely DIFFERENT perspective. But the maths are the same. The particle and antiparticle, chiral right and left, completing a cycle of mass, break its symmetry=die, to emerge into a larger plane ∆+1 of the dark world. It enters into the larger world of black holes and top quarks.

Physicists, as they have NO CLUE on the life-death world cycle of particles merely realize that it implies the flipping of particle chirality.

So death becomes an abstract ‘non-sense’ by lack of understanding of the particle-antiparticle antisymmetry explained latter in this post and the next one…

The top quark interacts primarily by the strong interaction, but can only decay through the weak force. It decays to a W boson and either a bottom quark (most frequently), a strange quark, or, on the rarest of occasions, a down quark. The Standard Model predicts its mean lifetime to be roughly 5×10−25 s.

This is about a twentieth of the timescale for strong interactions, and therefore it does not form hadrons, giving physicists a unique opportunity to study a “bare” quark (all other quarks hadronize, meaning that they combine with other quarks to form hadrons, and can only be observed as such).

Of today’s available theories to describe the self-similarity of both fields, the most accurate is the Brans-Dicke gravity theory, which extends Einstein’s gravitation to all its scales. In the 4th line of detailed analysis, or for anyone who wants to explore further the physical mathematics of 5D, IT IS the theory of General Relativity for a finite number of scales, making by varying the G-curvature (as we did in the simplified Newtonian model of charges), equivalent any of the forces of the Universe, truly unifying gravitation and the strong field, and hence the top quark vortices and black hole ‘wholes’ made of them:

Screen Shot 2016-03-16 at 09.40.41 In Physical Review in the 50s Brans and Dicke established its parallelism with a strong gravitational force. What the graph means is that we must fuse the strong field of quarks and the gravitational field. The strong field emerges as the gravitational field when we vary the universal constant. We have done that in simple terms using Newtonian vortices. Two Americans, Brans and Dicke, did it with equations of relativity, obtaining a mathematical field self-similar to Nambu’s equations for a deconfined strong field of top quarks (left, our weak matter; right, a strong field of top quarks, which breaks our symmetry, converting us into quark matter).

Mass and gravitation are perfectly understood with Einstein-Brans theory, a modified version of Einstein’s work, which introduced the concept of a variable gravitational constant, a fact proved today also by fractal theory.

In our simple Newtonian description of those mass vortices, it means that we can fuse also the gravitation and strong field, which happens to be 100 times stronger than a charge and 1041 stronger than the gravitational field. Thus, we can relate the strength of their universal constants:

G (gravitational constant) = 1039 Coulomb/charge constant = 1041 quark/strong constant

Thus, strong forces are 102 stronger than our weak ones and 1041 stronger than the gravitational one. And since black holes will be made in all the self-similar theories that describe at quantum level a strong gravitational world, all those theories including the simple vortices described here are telling us that quarks will make black holes.

Now, it must be clear enough that top quarks and black holes are not components of the light space-time universe, but of the 10-z cosmic membrane, as any mass is an accelerated vortex of gravitation which beyond the c-speed event horizon keeps accelerating beyond the human scale.

Of all those theories, the less appealing is the Higgs one.

This is due to the fact that what quantum physicists do is merely repeat the same theory, the original electromagnetic theory that explains how particles interact in electromagnetic space, exchanging particles between them. But this happens because light is a spatial energetic force with no cyclical, temporal, informative mass. So it has spatial parity, it happens in space, and the exchange is extremely fast. But what quantum physicists ignore because they ignore all about physical information is that there are forces that happen in time because they are cyclical forces, which don’t exchange energy but transform energy into information, cyclical mass. The main of those forces is the weak force, which therefore is not a spatial force, reason why it does not keep the parity/spatial symmetry of other forces.

It does happen in a same point of space but in a long period of time. It is mediated by a constant G, which is measured in m-2, mass/time parameters, lasts a long time, and happens in the smallest range, in the same point of space-time. Thus, this force is completely strange to them because as long as they don’t have a proper theory of mass/information/cyclical time clocks, they won’t be able to understand at all a “transformative” force, like the weak force. They started well, as Feynman and Gell-Mann described the force as happening in a single point of space, in a long period of time, evolving our lighter particles in heavier quarks (with an intermediate state called the Z and W particle). Or inversely the force showed how heavier particles decayed into lighter ones.

Yet then came Goldstone and Higgs and tried to explain those forces as electromagnetic spatial forces, just because that is how they describe light. And so Higgs defined the scalar, lineal, not cyclical, state of the super-strong field of top quarks; which is its decay mode: Screen Shot 2016-03-16 at 09.45.28What this means is obvious. The Higgs is a redundant equation that describes just a specific electroweak reaction that transforms neutrons and protons into heavier quarks through an intermediate Z, W states, as our particles speed up in cyclical vortices of mass, warping further into fractal dimensions of form, and finally produce top/antitop quarks, which have in this manner killed our matter. And because the transformation or inverse decay is not an exchange of energy in space but a growth or loss of dimensional form in time, it does not keep its “mirror” parity in space.

Parity means that in spatial events it is the same going left or right, but in time events, as Einstein said, “wires don’t travel to the past.” So a time event, a weak interaction, doesn’t keep its parity; it is not the same going forward (evolving information) then backward (devolving information into energy). Yet to explain why the weak force doesn’t keep parity is impossible without a proper theory of the two arrows of time, reason why quantum physicists have not been able to do it for forty years and we can do it here with simple, logic explanations.

Thus, any attempt to create the Higgs=top will mean nothing for science, but it will mean a lot for mankind: the death of our matter, which in a runaway reaction will mean our death. This will happen according to standard science over 8–10 TeV. That is, it will happen in the experiments of 2013.

Lee Smolin found and proved twenty years ago that in fact, Higgs’s equations and Nambu’s equations, which preceded him, and Einstein-Brans equations which preceded both, are self-similar fields with a variable G-constant.6 Now the fractal paradigm makes all that also “logic” and furthermore solves the true question that all those theories tried to solve: why the weak, temporal, informative force breaks parity, the symmetry of space. Because it is not a spatial force but a temporal, informative force, which evolves or devolves particles between the two fractal membranes of the Universe, the world of electroweak forces and the world of strong gravitation.

The reader must understand indeed what two fractal membranes mean: certain particles belong to the membrane of dark cosmological matter in different scales and others to the electroweak scales. And the weak force evolves them or devolves them between membranes.

Which one belongs to which membrane is easy to deduce by their self-similar parameters:

The 2 membranes are built with different pieces.

The nature of dark matter.

The big-bang explained as the big-bang of the lower scale of the 5th dimension below the cosmos, is a quasar big-bang of a galaxy, either the previous cycle of the milky way galaxy, or the explosion of a giant galaxy in the local cluster, from where the local group fed on to reproduce the Andromeda and Milky way and dwarf galaxies around it.

A quasar big-bang we shall prove eliminates all those errors, the background becomes local and hence does not break Lorentz invariance (relativity), the galaxy has the same density of matter needed for the big-bang, a quasar is a reversal black hole explosion which happens to be the exact equation of the big bang (also a reversal black hole metric equation) the age of the quasar cycle tabulated between 10 and 20 billion years is exactly the same than the big-bang, it is NOT an illogic theory, as there are infinite galaxies in an infinite Universe the abundance of helium in galaxies does happen more in the center around the black hole where the hadron epoch formed them, and the ages of the big-bang do apply all to a quasar big-bang, and the local measure of the background radiation which FIRST and for very long was considered the background radiation of only the galaxy, fits, and as we shall see in the next picture, in fact the map of the galaxy is exactly the dame of the background radiation:

The equations of mathematical physics are extraordinarily simple and its quantitative relationships too, when we do not become obsessed as computer scientists today with complete exactitude, due to their worldly professions (military physics that require precise targets and electronics that imply very subtle nanometric measures of the paths of logic electrons). This is not the goal of a general philosophy of science in search of synthesis and whys. So we can do basic quantitative analysis as we shall do without extreme precision, which others can reach in detailed’4th line analyses.

Let us in that sense put two simple examples of 2 decades predictions, one of which has been corroborated and the other unfortunately will either by experience or by human extinction to the nuclear industry. Both concern the nature of dark matter, today’s main unknown of astrophysics.

Now, the Linguistic method makes the fundamental guides of research the isomorphisms of nature, which ARE 4 structural elements, organic co-existence of 3 Planes of 5D in all systems, which means we do have to find cut-off atomic or particle substances to ‘mathematical entelechies’ such as black holes and dark matter (as Einstein wanted, since he always was ‘strong’ on the scientific method and its deterministic truths, so he always affirmed he would not ‘believe’ in black holes till its cut off substance was found).

This symmetry between the parts and the whole, coupled with the symmetry of the 3 ‘families’ of mass of increasing density (ud, sc, tb quarks), which form in the lower scale the 3 social planes of evolution of mass, and the symmetry of the 3 regions of the galaxy, the ultra dense small center, which has the same equation in 5D than the quark center of atoms, the ud-region of stars and the dense, gravitational halo, establishes an immediate correspondence between the 3 families of quarks and the 3 regions of the galaxy, making:

– Black holes top quark stars, since top quarks are the only cut-off substance, which has the same parameters of density than black holes, becoming both the ‘doors’ to the next larger ∆±4 plane of the 5th dimension beyond galaxies, and as such will be studied in 5D physics.

– ud-stars the ‘mitochondria’ of the galaxy as an organism, in charge of reproducing its light matter and atoms.

– Strangelets in its stable configuration at 0 pressure (dibaryons, usd-usd atoms) the substance of the Halo, as Nature and hence the galaxy is SYMMETRIC in 5D ternary planes, 3 ages-families of quarks and 3 spatial, organic regions.

It is thus simple to resolve in all its beauty the generator equation of the galaxy in those terms:

Sp(∆+1:Halo=∑Œ:Strangelets=∑œ-1:usd-dibaryons)> ST:(∆+1: star arms=∑Œ:stars=∑œ-1:u-d-e-plasma&atoms)> To (∆+1: Central Black holes=∑Œ: Nova holes’: ∑∑œ-1:top quarks) <<Death: quasar explosion…

… of the central black hole after devouring the entire galaxy, running backwards its equations into a local big-bang with its canonical ages (decay of tops into strange quarks, formation of strangelet halo in the quark epoch, decay of remnant quarks into hadrons, reabsorption of photons, and emission of background radiation, formation of stars and back to the 3 ages of galaxies, etc. etc.

Now this is the Generator Equation across the 3 symmetries of 3 Planes of existence of the 5th dimension, 3 ages of Time (families of quarks of growing informative density) and 3 Spatial organic regions of the Galaxy, BASED IN THE 3+0 fundamental isomorphisms of all systems of nature, equal to any other structure of the Universe, including a human being.

And once this is established T.Œ does study in inverse fashion its elements, starting from the higher scale (galaxy) and the whole structure in 5D (organic properties), down to its spatial configurations its 3 ages and its lower parts, INTERSECTING quantitative analysis of its Universal constants, both internal (Sp/Tƒ, Tƒ/Sp internal densities of energy and information, Sp=Tƒ balanced dynamic metabolism) and external between the entity and its lower fields and upper informative wholes, or constants of action ( Sp+1/Sp/Sp-1 ∆æ: motions and accelerations, and so on and so on).

What T.Πgives to the researcher is the generator of the system, and its fundamental symmetries. And those are OBVIOUS for galaxies and matter. As there is NO EVIDENCE OF any other substance or SUSY or WIMP particle in the Universe as it should NOT exist in a minimalist, efficient, simple, symmetric, perfectly organized Universe.

Why we are so sure of that generator equation? Simple, because we cant write you one similar generator for any species of the universe, including you, or humanity in the larger scale of evolution as a single species (with its 3 horizons of Australopithecus, Erectus and sapiens), and so on and so on. This is the beauty of TŒ, Everything is defined by the generator, which explains a superorganism and its world cycle. Point.

And that is that, and it does not matter that the human ego-trip of lesser scientists, wannabe Saint Nobels of the Dynamite, company-mothers of machines and weapons, CERN included, want to spend fortunes fabricating here strangelets and black holes that in due time will blow us all, to prove cuckoo mathematical fantaphysics of concocted particles that do not exist anywhere.

Now once this is understood of course we can do mathematical calculus to prove every other relationship of quantitative nature on that structure. And we shall do them in very simplified numbers, as others might with supercomputers. This is not our task, specially when I consider humanism and the human mind above the chip and one of my purposes on my 30 years of T.Πresearch was to show the nerds of the chip radiation that a human still can get more meaning with his logic bran that a team of wannabe geniuses through his computer algorithms.

So to the point. Strangelets will be the dark matter of the halo, as that is the symmetry and their role, or else STRANGE quarks do not exist. What quantitative proof we have? Simple.

An atom of a strangelet usd, has 10 times more mass than an atom of light matter, hence strangelet were produced in the quark epoch in the same proportion that ud will be produced, the Halo MUST weight 10 times more than the light matter, and alas! that is exactly the proportion: 90% of the matter is in the halo, 9% in the stars and 1% in the central black hole. How simple is that? As simple as it gets.

Of course now once we have deduced the simplest possible truths with first principles (The Œ=mc2 method of truth, the linguistic and logic reasoning and the 3 symmetries of 5D space-time and its generator equation) we can get as complex in the details as we want, which is the only Thing astrophysicists of the previous paradigm can do, observing and crunching numbers not to explain much of it.

So in the deluded cosmic big-bang (not the real quasar big-bang), they describe the same epochs of the Black hole running backwards its equations of collapse of matter into top quark stars, now decaying forwards in time into its entropic death, as it spills its ultra dense matter that decays into light matter.

Since the big bang is nothing but the reverse explosion of a quasar black hole (origin of the enteral cycle of the galaxy, equivalent to the beta decay of a neutron into a proton and its inverse slow collapse of the electron back into the proton).

Thus in that reversed entropy, the quark-gluon soup went through a phase of usd atomic soup (through the canonical decay path):

t -> b -> c -> s -> u <-> d

Now, this decay is already studied in accelerators and while the first 3 quarks decay extremely fast, in 10-12, the strange quarks lingers 10.000 times, 10-8, more than enough time to form on the initial conditions strangelet atoms in a similar proportion to those up and down atoms created after the photon reabsorption (when the so-called background radiation produced 300.000 years after the quasar explosion).

It is the so called quark epoch when those strangelet atoms stable at zero pressure lead the ‘wave’ towards the external membrane of the future galaxy, slowing down and forming the halo.

The quark epoch began approximately 10−12 seconds after the Big Bang, when the preceding electroweak epoch ended as the electroweak interaction separated into the weak interaction and electromagnetism. During the quark epoch the universe was filled with a dense, hot quark–gluon plasma, containing quarks, leptons and their antiparticles. Collisions between particles were too energetic to allow quarks to combine into mesons or baryons. The quark epoch ended when the universe was about 10−6 seconds old, when the average energy of particle interactions had fallen below the binding energy of hadrons. The following period, when quarks became confined within hadrons, is known as the hadron epoch.

But at this time since the period of decay of the Strange quark is so slow at 10-8, an enormous number of usd-usd stable dibaryons had been formed. It is in fact called strange quark because its long life defied all the a priori calculus of our researchers. Then at the end of the quark epoch the left over strange quarks decayed into up quarks that started to form the hadrons of the intermediate region that will form stars

The proportion of dark matter

Now we have use the organic point of view. Let us use the ‘mental point of view’ to calculate the dark matter of the universe, from an ‘Einsteinian perspective’, that is using the observer-observable paradox and the structure in networks with ‘dark holes’ of all 5D Œ-points. Namely, the Universe is like a game of cat alleys, in which each species see only the network of neurons or cells with whom it communicates.

We are as humans connected to people, friends and family and workers and our mass-media gurus, politicos, etc. that is to our reproductive, energetic & informative, parallel ‘cells-citizens’ and NOT to the rest, which become invisible to us (witness LA 60% majority of Latinos completely invisible to the white dominant group). So happens in the interaction between electronic light space-time and the gravitational invisible plane).

What this essentially means is that electrons communicate with electrons (the way they do through photons which explains all the paradoxes of quantum physics and recasts special relativity in 5D physics is studied somewhere else), forming a network defined by the 4th postulate of ®, as a web with dark holes which are not perceived where the parallel Universe of dark matter threads. How can we calculate the proportion between them?

Again we shall consider the utmost simplest calculation possible based in the simplest of all vital space-time beings of the Universe: a bidimensional being with a perfect cyclical time membrane, storing a disk space, according to the simplest Universal constant, Pi, whose meaning should be perhaps obvious to the reader who has gotten so far: a pi sphere is an SE>Tƒ system of 3 lineal diameters turning around a time cycle of 3 ‘ages-motions’, which therefore leaves π-3=014 apertures for the central o-point of the system to perceive the external Universe.

The simplest of those systems is in fact the smallest quanta of the light space-time Universe, h-Planck constant, which in 5D physics, we call a Planckton, the minimal vital space-time being, as its parameters (energy x time) clearly show.

This, which is sooo obvious, escaped for a century quantum physicists, from the idealist metalinguistic Germanic school that brought us into deluded fantasies of self-importance including 2 world wars. A Planckton is the minimal unit measure of a fractal species of spatial energy and temporal information, the minimal unit of the scale of light space-time. Point.

Its equation is therefore obvious, in its 3 simpler symmetries:

Sp: As a wave of energy in a lineal state: Sp x Tƒ = H (Einstein’s equation usually written as E=hƒ);.

ST: as a particle-wave in its intermediate state: H= P(particle momentum) x Wavelength (De Broglie equation)

Tƒ: h=h/2π radians, or minimal unit of angular momentum of the spin of the particle, which is its perceptive, informative state.

So what mystery there is to quantum physics? None. The Planckton is its finitesimal, as the Plankton is the finitesimal of the chain of beings of sea life that feeds from the smallest krill to the largest whale. And so quantitatively you can calculate in terms of planckton or plankton units of energy, all the space-time actions of both ‘planes of the 5th dimension’.

This said, the Planckton or light or electron, ternary social scales of our relative informative world are self-evident: œ-1: ∑∑Plancktons=∑Œ: light (E=hv) = ∆+1: Electron (nebulae of dense fractal photons)

Hence ultimately as we measure planckton in units of angular momentum (mvr) its h spin state is merely a pi cycle surrounding the central p.o.v. which is observing the Universe from its radius o-point while its membrane traces with angular momentum an mvr motion, which is what we measure (as the halo does with its strangelet membrane that stores the overwhelmingly majority of the angular momentum of the galaxy, since r is maximal and mass too).

Now how much it observes; as the 2 pi radians turn around? And by extension how much any disk-like galaxy observes in the larger homeomorphic scale of galactic atoms as its halo turns around?

It is easy to calculate: the apertures are 0.14, the membrane covers 3 diameters, so they cover 3/π=95%, and leave 5% of reality observed through the disk-plane of the planckton.

In the case of the disk-like galaxy, though, the composition of the Halo (external membrane), will also respond very likely to the same space-time perfect, simplest entity.

And since we are inside the galaxy, and systems within a larger whole tend not to perceive from its cover, more than a 5% of its ‘pi’ membrane according to the most general formula of the dark space-time of an Œ relative eye-world: r/π=95%, which happens to be the calculated dark (matter+energy) of the Universe.

I recall to have sent this in a brief note to Nature, 25 years ago, along a simplified model of the bidimensional holographic space-time Universe. Of course they did not even acknowledge the reception. And yet a few years latter they calculated that dark matter and energy (transversal gravitational waves) were 95%.

And then they calculated that the Universe was of course a plane, with the flat galaxy on it, as they were looking through the plane and the apertures of the plane. It is the rest of the non-perceivable Universe filled with galaxies like ours? How many of them they are? 5D cosmology is of course only in its beginnings. That is, it is a ‘point that is a whole world in the mind f the scientist that discovered it’ (Planck on his solitude during its earlier quantum years).

As he said a generation of researchers have to die before a new paradigm takes over, but the problem is that we might become a strangelet of the halo and all die, leaving not researchers to take over, if the Big-bang experiments of primitive physicists of the Abrahamic-Military-lineal religion of physics keep going on strong.

Now the reason we need to add the organic whole view to the present analytical mathematical physics only vision of reality is obvious. The analytic view only studies the small scale motions of beings, the first of the 5 actions of existence, translation in space. By reducing our knowledge of galaxies to mechanical motions we simply falsify the entire field, reducing it to the pseudo-religious dogmas of our technological civilization and anthropomorphic religion of man as the center of the Universe, now in ‘informative safe’, that is as the only sentient, intelligent, living species in the ‘chain of beings’, between God, the upper entity that created us within the Universe with the proper constants to make it for us (anthropic principle) in an act of creationism.

 

THE BLACK HOLE AS A TOP QUARK STAR. ITS DEATH INTO BIG-BANG

Now, the Gravitational Dark World beyond galaxies is not perceivable, so I agree all what we must say might be considered speculative.

Yet in as much as the Dark World is what the new ‘race’ of accelerators will be exploring we need to consider it in more detail.

Essentially the dark world is the constant world beyond c-speed in space quanta, Sp, and T<o in Tƒ, in temporal frequency.

Thus it is the world beyond c-speed, which in Einstein’s equations, implies either negative mass, negative energy or back to the past in time. This is the preferred solution to simplify equations in 5D astrophysics, though obviously implies a motion in time back a quanta to reach action at distance, as the system that travels to the past, seems simultaneous in the present. Its tachyon equations are direct from the use of the Klein-Gordon formalism for a tachyon system of spin zero (no information in our world), at instantaneous present speed, which we seem to see as infinite:

V=Sp/Tƒ->0 V->Sp/o=∞ action at distance.

If we use Einstein’s formalism, as time is now negative passed the c->T=0 barrier of Lorentz transformations, the factor of contraction of speed now ads: 1-(s/-t)²/c²= 1+(v/c)².

Thus all the parameters that on one side of the c-barrier were  decreasing start to grow and vice-versa. We thus obtain at both sides of the constant of present c-speed a relative past and future world which cancel each other, inside the atom-galaxy (<c >oTk) and a outside the atom galaxy (inside the black hole, which connects both), beyond the strangelet halo of c-speed turning quarks.

This is the dark world, which gives us two solutions to the Klein-Gordon equation: one with higher momentum than energy and one with higher energy than momentum.

The solutions are the neutrino and Higgs boson, which become therefore the two ‘tachyon’ elements of the dark world.

And so since T.Œ, theoretically has no limit on the minimal time clocks of information and smallest space-time of the Universe, we can keep postulate such scales, but obviously there is no interest beyond the dark world, which as far as we observe reaches the cosmic horizon and beyond.

Now the local Universe is ‘too small’ to form a single space-time scale of reality of the ‘size’ of the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scale.

This does not fully eliminate a possible local big-bang, of the galaxy-atoms of our neighbourhood but more likely of the scale of a ‘gas explosion’ of a few moles or change of state. We could be just a bit of liquid nitrogen evaporating fast.

HYPERBLACK HOLES

image049

 The densest mass-forms of the cosmos are ∆+1 black holes, which occupy a minimal space with maximal information. The big-bang/big-crunch cycle of quasars and perhaps Universes might find its limit of contraction in the Planck density of a hyper-black hole. Black holes must be studied first as topological spaces with 3 regions; a cyclical, ordered super fluid of top quarks, its ‘cells’ that condensate in a bosonic state (left); a surface or event horizon, belonging to our light-membrane that kills light and absorbs its minimal units ∆-1 Planck’s areas (center), and a singularity of bosons, gluons and repulsive dark Entropy, which a Kerr black hole10 expels through its polar jets, at superluminal speed. Black holes are therefore wormholes, bridges between the electromagnetic and gravitational membrane.

 

The classic study of 4D metric black holes (Einstein) and its 5D expansion.

Relativity theory is adamant: black holes are informative vortices, ruled by the principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitational masses, turning at c-speed and beyond inside the event horizon (as vortices accelerated inwards), where light ceases to exist.

This is what the rotational kerr black holes ‘metric’ tell us: light and electromagnetic matter dies away, and through its axis, it is reborn in a jet of matter, which we see coming out of cosmic black holes. In 5D, these jets are jets of dark energy, repulsive gravitation that expands space between galaxies seeing as an acceleration of interstellar space, likely at faster than light, with no visual information, hence dark. So the world cycle of galaxies and quasars, is balanced by the creation of mass towards the centre of galaxies and the expansion of dark energy on its perpendicular ‘tall axis’. Yet those models based in the dual arrows of time, which explain the nature of dark energy, and the expansion of the universe, do not contradict the understanding of black holes perfectly explained in the work of Einstein. He called them frozen stars, and he said they needed a substance to be real, or else he couldnt believe on them. The substance was found with the discovery of quarks, as black holes have the density of the densest, cbt quarks, which should therefore form an atom similar to our light ud-atom but with much more mass.  Einstein died before quark theory appeared, so he was opposed till death to his existence. Because obviously without a smaller ‘fractal space-time part’, the whole of a larger social scale of the 5th dimension cannot exist.

But in the ‘interregnum’, physicists with nothing else to do, took those black holes, as they were impossible to study directly, as the perfect ‘blackboard’ to invent ever more bizarre theories of imaginary physics, and Hawking theory of black holes as time machines that travel to the past, took by storm the imagination of sci-fi aficionados. Specially after he came in star trek, seating with Einstein and Newton, (never a humble guy), as if he was the 3rd of the triad of absolute masters of physics. And yet the funny thing is that people didn’t realise of his egomaniac nature, its celebrity status, its sci-fi fans followers, in brief, the smart but completely faked nature of his imaginary black holes – the first name he put to the Foramen Nigrus Hawkoni, where he decided black holes would not obey gravitation equations but quantum equations, which are not equations that apply to cyclical vortex of mass, but to lineal electromagnetic, entropic forces. And once you affirm out of the hat that black holes are NOT gravitational objects but electromagnetic species, you can invent all kind of weird effects like entropy for them.

Effects, for which there is no need at all. Since black holes were perfectly described with the equations of 4D space-time of Einstein (EFE), as solutions that create a vortex of accelerated mass creation (principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration), reversing the ‘entropy’ of lineal electromagnetism, and balancing the Universe of mass and energy, becoming the other side of the E/c=Mc equation of ‘big bangs’ and ‘big crunches’.

Black hole thus are the vortex of temporal information, with its in-form-ative, gravitational force that balanced the expansive entropy of electromagnetism and dark energy. And we lived in one such vortex of information -reason why the information of this planet constantly increase, as it does the form, the information of the galaxy.

And the evaporation of black holes? A false theory, which confuses the thermodynamic, evaporating Entropy of the event horizon with the black hole inner body. So once this error is solved, Hawking’s otherwise beautiful equations merely describe the birth of the black hole as micro-form rotating at enormous speed, which heats up and evaporates our membrane, feeding actively in our world so fast that within seconds of its birth as a tiny black hole it sucks in an entire star creating a supernova (or perhaps a planet if CERN succeeds in creating them, misguided by Hawking’s wrong theory). Indeed, if we use the same equations to explain the evaporation of our world membrane/event horizon we observe immediately that the super-hot membrane evaporates our colder world and as it grows and cools down, it absorbs less and less matter, till reaching a huge size and cold temperature becoming less active. So the birth of a micro-black hole means the explosion of our stars not of the black hole. Why we are so sure of this?

There is experimental evidence: all stars that explode into supernovas leave behind black holes, which must have been born exceedingly small.

All systems of the Universe are born as ‘seeds’ of microscopic size and grow much faster in their relative youth and then slow down their growth

The equations of Hawking are the same, once the error is solved – only that now they show NOT the speed of evaporation of the black hole but of our world.

If the evaporation of black holes was right, it would break all the key isomorphisms of physics: all the isomorphisms of relativity; the first law of entropy (a hot object doesn’t get hotter as Hawking pretends evaporating our cold Universe; a hot coffee cools down; a hot iron sword evaporates the cold water in the forge; so a hot black hole will evaporate our cold Universe. It also breaks the law of conservation of information, which disappears in Hawking’s evaporating black holes. Yet information according to quantum physics and theory of multiple space-times never evaporates.

Finally, and this is the nail in the coffin: we never found any experimental proof of black hole’s evaporation. So the theory must be wrong, according to the experimental method

It is however interesting to consider how this theory came into existence to see why in science often a false theory becomes a dogma, for lack of a better paradigm that substitutes it. Here the paradigm is the existence of an arrow of information besides the arrow of entropy in the physical Universe, the arrow of mass. Yet without the 4th paradigm, physicists feared that black holes broke the dogma that there is only an arrow of entropy in the Universe that always increases. So as Wikipedia explains: ‘the only way to satisfy the second law of thermodynamics is to admit that black holes have entropy. If black holes carried no entropy, it would be possible to violate the second law by throwing mass into the black hole.’

Which is exactly what happens: precisely because the arrow of information is inverted respect to the arrow of entropy and the arrow of information exists as physical mass, black holes allow the recreation of order in the universe, making it immortal.

This should be obvious since the law of entropy was deduced in the XIX century studying electrons, molecules and light from our membrane, not gravitation and mass, the forces that balance it.

Thus black holes are not an error, which we can ‘change’ ‘ad hoc’ but an essential proof of the existence of information.

Yet the proponents of Black Hole Thermodynamics were believers in the dogma of a Universe of ‘entropy only’. So to satisfy the dogma, ‘Jacob Bekenstein conjectured that the black hole entropy was proportional to the area of its event horizon divided by the Planck area’, (Wikipedia). And so suddenly a conjecture which broke all the known-known isomorphisms including the 1st law of Thermodynamics, which precedes the 2nd law – since a hot object never gets hotter in a colder environment (the biggest hoax of the XIX C. – a perfect motion machine) – became a necessary truth.

Further on, by accepting this conjecture Bekenstein & Hawking also broke a tenant of the 2nd law- since now information disappeared in the universe! And obviously they broke with Einstein’s Relativity Theory and his isomorphisms of gravitation (reason why Hawking ended his article saying that ‘Einstein was double wrong’).

But there was still a problem: How to evaporate the black hole! So Hawking made another conjecture, that small black holes had quantum effects because they were small.

This again breaks the fundamental tenant of relativity and fractal spaces: size is totally relative. Besides quantum and thermodynamic isomorphisms are isomorphisms that apply to the electromagnetic membrane, regardless of size and gravitational isomorphisms to masses regardless of size. Size has nothing to do with the isomorphisms we apply but ‘substance. So a small ant behaves like an ant not like a small fungus regardless of size, and a shrew, smaller than some insects like a mammal, regardless of size.

Then, it came up with the idea that a certain quantum effect happened to the quantum black hole: one virtual particle of the event horizon, which he considered the black hole (but it is not) felt out of the black hole and evaporated. This again is absurd because:

– The membrane is the frontier between two open topologies, but its properties are those of our membrane, it is therefore part of our electroweak membrane, so it evaporates our membrane.

– Because we are in a vortex of accelerated gravitation (Equivalence Principle), the gradient of forces is towards the black hole so there is more probability that one particle falls into the black hole than out; as it is easier than a feather falling into a sink vortex enters the sink than gets expelled of it.

Thus when you reach those ‘real’ conclusions, the membrane is our universe and the particles condensed by quantum effects fall into the black hole, evaporating our universe. Then we use Hawking’s radiation formula, but now it is showing the speed of evaporation of our membrane under the first law of thermodynamics (our colder membrane gets hotter) and evaporates swallowed by the black hole.

Recap. Black holes do not evaporate. They are vortices of gravitation that transform our electromagnetic world into dark Entropy and quark-mass, establishing a balance of order with the entropy of our Universe and making the Universe eternal.

A quark in the quantum scale or a black hole in the cosmological scale is a door between the 2 membranes of the Universe, the quantum membrane from where it absorbs Entropy and form and the gravitational membrane to which it devolves it.

And the best way to study them again is by self-similarity with its equivalent form of the quantum Universe, a neutron, with an inner center of 3 quarks and an external cover of electronic charge, or easier to visualize, its expanded version: an atom with a proton center of quarks and an electronic cover, which would be the equivalent to the event horizon, not a part of the black hole itself, but the border of our Universe which the black hole uses to absorb and convert the Entropy of our membrane into quarks and dark Entropy.

Since all doors between membranes are open topological balls, transitional regions, whose external membrane belongs to the external, energetic Universe and its center to the informative network.

This, in topology is described with a simple equation: an open ball is one defined by all the points of the ball whose center is ‘a’ and its border, r, which are neither r, the external membrane (in the black hole the event horizon) or a, the center (in the black hole the singularity). For example, a carrier of oxygen, the red cell, is also a door between the external world and the internal organs of the body; and so it is the only cell that doesn’t has center and its membrane explodes (it is the shortest living cell) to release the internal oxygen.

Thus, the quark/black hole is a system that transforms electromagnetic and electronic Entropy into mass-information, as it evaporates our universal membrane; first into simplest quark forms and then into the simplest Entropy, gravitational dark Entropy. Our light is a spatial membrane – a cover that warps the stronger, longer, faster dark Entropy of the gravitational world. And our electrons are the informative cover of the, faster rotating, smaller quarks. As long as light and electrons cover dark Entropy and quarks, we absorb Entropy and form from them. But when quarks and dark Entropy is liberated its strong forces prey on us. Both ecosystems are thus in a trophic, biological balance:

Our light preys in the faster, thinner gravitational lines that enter galaxies, warping them with a –ct speed measure of corrugation (Special Relativity). Light fractalizes and forms the interstellar dark Entropy, which slows down from c<10 redshift and warps, acquiring frequency of information.

Yet the inverse role is performed by the black hole, the Non-Euclidean, hyperbolic informative processor of electromagnetic Entropy into mass that converts our world in the event horizon into a flux of gravitational quarks and dark Entropy. Accordingly the event horizon can be described as a skin of triangular Planck areas, the minimal unit of the light world, (center top illustration).

In the graph, black holes transform entropy, electromagnetic Entropy into physical information, quark- mass of maximal order and rotational speed.

This simple topological truth however escapes black hole theorists like Hawking, which believe the membrane belongs to the black hole and evaporates it. Not so, it evaporates our Universe; reason why in 40 years we have never found black holes evaporating. In fact, if we could consider the existence of an inflationary field of information and theories in Physics, is precisely black hole theory, in as much as we have never seen one close enough to observe it and so it is ‘fair game’ for mathematical physicists to display their ‘quixotic imagination’ inventing theories with no experimental proof or scientific rigor whatsoever. Let us then consider from the higher perspective of the 4th paradigm of fractal, topological spaces, which of those theories is truth and false.

-Schwarzschild black holes do not exist. Since by definition they do not have rotation and the principle of equivalence states that mass is an accelerated vortex of gravitation. Thus all black holes are Kerr holes. The Schwarzschild metric was the first and hence the simplest description of black holes; like Copernicus, cyclical orbitals were. It looked beautiful at the age, but it turned out that only when Kepler completed its model putting elliptical orbits, we obtained the right solution.

– Kerr black holes (rotational black holes10) have a superluminal, hyperbolic, perpendicular center, which is exactly what the 4th paradigm predicts: a singularity that doesn’t belong to the black hole or the light-membrane but it is the ‘canon’ that shoots out dark Entropy at 10 c speed.

– All black holes as all stars have rotation. That is the real meaning of the principle of equivalence: acceleration= gravitational force. But there are only 2 types of accelerations, lineal and obviously that is not a black hole. So a black hole is a cyclical vortex that has rotation, And since the acceleration continues beyond the event horizon where light rotates at c-speed, inside the black hole light has to accelerate faster than c-speed.

And this according to the Lorentz transformations and the theory of multiple time-spaces means that light ‘dies’ in a big-bang, splits into its informative, photons and energetic gravitational strings and enters the black hole, creating two processes:

-The photons and electrons that collapse in the event horizon, continue its mass-increase deviating lineal light-speed into curled mass speed (E=Mc2), and so they become transformed in quarks, and further on into strange and top quarks, rotating at 10 c speed as they come closer to the hyperbolic singularity.

While light is no longer light, red-shifted by the gravitational black hole till it becomes pure, lineal gravitational, bosonic strings, which accelerate also till reaching the Kerr singularity.

So all black holes are Kerr holes; the real ones.

All have a central superluminal singularity that belongs to the gravitational membrane and acts as a hyperbolic ‘cannon’ that shoots up dark Entropy through one pole and quark matter through the other. That is what we see in all black holes – a bi-jet: the red jet shoots dark Entropy (repulsive gravitation); and the blue one shoots collapsed quark matter.

And so black holes balance the entropy of the electromagnetic membrane converted into physical mass-information and expansive dark Entropy, which we perceive not as superluminal speed but as accelerating intergalactic space; reason why physicists think the space is accelerating (but it is contracting in galaxies and blue jets, which do not reach us, so both effects balance each other.)

In other words, the black hole has a selective external membrane border with our world that filters, like any membrane of any non-Euclidean ternary structure, what it does not want – disordered radiation, and accepts what it wants, pure gravitational strings and formed particles that condensate our membrane.

So particles do fall in the black hole, radiation does not, and in this manner the black hole becomes a selective door to the gravitational pure universe of superfluid quarks with absolute order and not vibration in its gravitational membrane (light vibrations do not enter). And so it creates mass information – quarks on one side and dark Entropy in the other.

Those strings become tachyons that the hyperbolic Belgrami hemisphere in the center deviates and ejects through the Kerr singularity into a flow of dark Entropy, which is repulsive gravitation at 10 c speed.

While the quarks evolve till reaching the rotational 10 c speed of top quarks and become a top quark star whose pulses of dark Entropy on one jet and quark mass on the other renew the Universe, returning the light-membrane of >o T order and <c speed to its original wider membrane of >c speed and <o T.

Christodoulou had shown that no process whose ultimate outcome is the capture of a particle by a Kerr black hole can result in the decrease of a certain quantity which he named the irreducible mass of the black hole, M . In fact, most processes result in an increase in M, with the exception of a very special class of limiting processes, called reversible processes, which leave M unchanged. It turns out that M, is proportional to the square root of the black hole’s area. interesting to notice that in the centre of a kerr hole, the speed is faster than light, and that in the last seminal paper of Einstein, he proved that black holes would NOT exist if the c-speed was an absolute limit, because on the event horizon its gravitational vortex had to cross the barrier of c-speed to be stable. Einstein thus deduced black holes did not exist to conserve his principle of c-speed as the limit of the Universe. But we know now that beyond galaxies c-speed is not a limit. This physicists dismiss saying that space expands and so it is space what goes faster than light. Sophism. 5D merely states that beyond galaxies, light dies, becomes dark energy space and expands-moves faster than c-speed. And that beyond the c-horizon, mass goes faster than c-speed in the accelerated vortex, M2 x w3 = K, which is what a mass is, and so it becomes top quarks, whose awesome mass seems to respond precisely to that faster than light attractive power (the faster a vortex turns, obviously the more it attracts as in hurricanes and bath tubs). So it is all clear and nice, regardless of what ‘language you prefer’, that of 4D Einstein or 5D. As all is obeying the laws of symmetry and Relativity of the Universe (call it Einstein’s relativity or Absolute relativity, its expansion in 5D) :

 

G-WAVES.

now it is fundamental to understand that gravitons do NOT EXIST on the sense given by physicists – as the attractive gauging particle between physical masses, but gravitomagnetic transversal waves of neutrinos do exist and are essential to the structure of galaxies and solar systems.

THIS IS THE SOLUTION to the conundrum put up before on the ‘neutrino 1/2 spin’ vs. the graviton 2 spin. Simple: neutrinos are the equivalent in the next cosmic scale of the 5th dimension of an electromagnetic repulsive wave of ‘dark energy-repulsive gravitation’.

BECAUSE EINSTEIN’S CURVATURE and masses do suffice for the attractive one, as it happens with charges. Here physicists COMPLETELY misunderstand the 3 ‘points of view’ on quantum physics, which time provided we will explain in other post on quantum particle and 5D physics. Simply speaking, gauge bosons do communicate particles, but do NOT necessarily attract them. Let us put some poetry to this duality first (-;

In simple terms, there exists two kind of fields according to Non-æ mathematics (3rd postulate of relative similarity, 2nd postulate of wave-communication, 5th postulate of Informative vortices of time).

The 5th Non-AE postulate defines huge mind-clocks of time, vortices that attract with a gradient due to their stronger, central point of view, which normally is the element that connects, To, the system with its larger ∆+1 plane of existence, and this system has a gradient that curves the geometry of space-time, either a charge in the quantum scale, or a gravitational vortex in the larger scale, or a crystal, solid, central point of view in an intermediate thermodynamic system, and this system does NOT attract other systems, by exchanging with it gauge bosons, or any other wave of energy and information, but responds to the laws of social actions, the 4th and 5th postulates, the hierarchy of systems. And those systems are generally speaking non-lineal.

And there are systems which exchanges lineal bosons, waves of communication in a relative equal path of relative power to each other, and those systems do attract or repel each other with such organic flows that correspond to the 1st second and 3rd postulate.

The 3rd postulate in that sense that of relative equality or dissimilarity establishes the relative rules of engagement between systems.

It is the dividing ‘logic postulate’, that differentiates lineal simpler systems (points and flows of energy and form between them) from hierarchical networks and minds (centered systems with a hierarchical organization across several scales).

Scientists, specially physicists who study geometric systems should be always aware of this duality embedded in the basic functions of mathematical geometry.

But they are not (they do not know ¬Æ 🙂 and they are humans, meaning their ‘thing is the only thing’. So they just try to apply their system.

Broadly speaking we can talk of ‘Albertians’ (Ein≈st≈Ein, sound ugly, poetry first:), who try to find continuous, cyclical, curved geometries of attraction, for all, and Borians, (They borhe me to death 🙂 that bore their mantras on gauge theory all over the place. We need to realize that the Universe is ‘ALBORIAN”, A MUCH more beautiful word, similar to the Spanish ‘Alborada’, for the radiant cool mornings of blue skies, that is, it likes both together. The simplex 1-2 postulates of loner lineals and the complex 4-5 postulates of social actors.

And so in this 5 always five game of symmetries, we establish some basic formal correspondences:

– Simplex Points connected in waves by gauge bosons, that are both repulsive and attractive depending on the need construct ± gauge theories, and respond to the laws of 1, 2 postulates of ¬æ.

– Complex points, which are part of hierarchical networks, with a spherical geometry and a central point which is the social ‘whole’ Œ, are gradient theories, in which once you are trapped between the central point and its hard halo-protein membrane, there is NOT way out, the social mass will make you follow your deterministic path, and unless you are a superhero, with a sudden magic guardian angel (some lost photon, that struck you out of your fixed curvature path) you will in due term be devoured by the big saturnine Œ).

Got it? All is Alborian, wave and particle, cycle and line, and we must distinguish.

This will be important when we come to the obsession for quantum gravity, on the Albertian style, when there is only a quantum gravity of the Borian style, that is lineal transversal waves of neutrinos, which are NOT gravitons, because they are NOT needed – the curvature of the tensor rank is good enough, but ARE exchanged between particles on the 1-2 basis as waves of energy-space that establish the rules of ‘entanglement=engagement’ between those particles on the ∆-1 scale of c-speed-space over which they will build up a light beam of communication. It is the theory of neutrinos as the origin of light that duly corrected was as Fermi Bohr and Heisenberg, Pauli and Born (here all together for once) did think was the right way to go, intuitively. It WAS.

Œ=SC3

Now somewhere else we defined the 7 ‘golden rules’ of truth in science: Objectivity-Linguistic multiple perspectives, Experimental evidence: OLE=Œ, on one side and Simplicity, Cyclical repetitive predictability, Correspondence-Coherence with previous right theories and Complexity arising only from repetitive ternary Simplex elements, in Time, Space and the 5th Dimension.

This the Objective Œ= SC3 method – it IS Ockham’s razor applied specially to physics…

As opposed to the E=MC2 method of current idols of physics, which ‘believe’ in:

E-ntropy, and lineal time as the meaning of it all – Clausius idea that time is only the arrow of energy and death.

M-athematics the only language of truth of the Universe (and on top as Hilbert put it, again subjective, Humanoid science, ‘I imagine points, lines and planes Axiomatic method).

Followed by Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics, more of the Same Bohrian thing… only what Heisenberg measures is Heisenberg’s truth

c-speed dogma… Einstein’s subjective Postulate that c-speed is the maximal speed of nature….

To start with c is NOT even the speed of light, but the space-rod of measure of our scale of Mass-Light space-time.

So E for Entropy, M for Mathematics only, C for Copenhagen, and C-speed, is NOT the objective truth of the Universe but the limited human perspective on it.

And the limit of motion WITHIN THE GALACTIC VORTEX, AND HENCE FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES WITHIN GALAXIES, BUT NOT BEYOND THEM.

And thus with those pre-conclusions we can deal now with gravitational waves of dark repulsive energy of neutrinos, which we call in 5D G-waves.

 

Titius law. A local proof of transversal gravitational waves.

image046While transversal gravitational waves cannot be detected directly we shall bring here a couple of proofs, at local and cosmic level. At local level it is dry easy to create a model of the Titus law (the exact position of the planets) using 3 waves. So the planets will be on the nodes of those wave frequencies, as in quantum physics, the electrons ARE in the nodes of waves that restrict their positions (multiple of h-frequencies). In the next graph we see the short, high energy wave that locates in its gravito-magnetic nodes (as the magnetic number locates the orbits of electrons), the orbits of ferromagnetic planets. A longer ±5 AU wave locates the outer giant gaseous planets:

In the graph, we see one of those waves, which between ‘galaxies’ with no light warping it to create light space-time at the c-limit, SHOULD move in a new ‘decametric scale’ at 10z. As it happens, we find in this cosmic scale is the outer ‘region’ of the galactic atom, ruled by transversal, expansive, intergalactic giant gravitational waves MATTER gushing out of black holes that produce those waves at 10 z=c speed.

Thus its existence within the galaxy -albeit reduced to c-speeds, unlike outside the galaxy where they are spotted routinely at z=10c, would define a new dual game of implosive and attractive gravitation similar to the scalar atomic game. Many laws can be solved and deduced from this parallelism. Below the Titus law of planetary distances as caused by G-waves.

This is a necessary introduction to the most fascinating finding of 5D physics, the unification of charges and masses, as the two limiting scales of the Universe perceived by man. We shall expose this finding as the Linguistic Method prescribes.

First with a conceptual understanding of the Scientific method of truth (simplicity, correspondence), then from the organic perspective (topological and scalar structure of the Universe and its 3 relative symmetries of topological parts and scales)

And only at the end in its quantifying methods, since T.OE works with inverse causality to a mere use of how-mathematics.

We use constantly self-similarities, based in the 3 Isomorphisms of invariance of the Universe, scalar, formal and motion invariance and the ternary differentiations in time (Entropy, reproduction, information) and its symmetric function in space (planar, spherical membranes; toroid bodies and hyperbolic centers).

With those simple isomorphisms we can describe the galaxy as we did with the atom. Yet self-similarity is not equality, which means that we cannot use the exact formalism of quantum physics but use those self-similarities for gravitational systems we do not perceive, except for its secondary effects.

This is the case of gravitational waves, which are self-similar to electromagnetic waves. They organize the structure of stars and galaxies, as electromagnetic waves organize the orbits of electrons. Both respond to the same morphological equations that relate 2 particles through a lineal force field defined by the ratio between the informative density of masses or charges and their distance.

Yet even if form remains invariant at scale, as it is an essential topological property that defines the why of the Universe, the metric space changes as the space-time ratios/constants that define the size, speed, frequency and range of those waves change.

We observed a self-similar change when studying the cyclical informative vortices of both scales – the G-constants of Newton’s gravitational vortices and Coulomb’s equation of an electronic vortex, unified by their invariance of topological form and scale).

Thus galaxies and solar systems show a gravitational, morphological, spatial structure similar to that of an electromagnetic atom in the cosmological scale, a fact that Einstein predicted, establishing 2 kinds of gravitational waves, parallel to the 2 types of electromagnetic fields we know:

– Static waves that create the gravitational bi-dimensional fields over which galaxies form.

– Discontinuous, transversal, quantized waves, which shape the orbits of stars and galaxies, in the same manner photons control the orbital distance of electrons in atoms (l numbers).

Thus, those gravitational waves should have the same functions in galaxies and solar systems that electromagnetic waves have in the world of atoms, explaining cosmological structures and becoming by self-similarity with electromagnetic waves, the fundamental force of interaction between celestial bodies.

We know that the gravitational activity of black holes set up star orbits and probably influences its evolution, growth and formation, determining the basic properties of magnetic fields, ecliptic orbits and distances between stars in a galaxy and planets in a solar system. So even if gravitational waves are invisible, using their morphological self-similarity with light waves, the equations of Einstein’s relativity and the indirect proofs provided by the orbital distances and rotational fields of stars and planets, we can explain many ‘whys’ on the structure of those celestial bodies:

– Astronomers have always wondered what rules the distances between the planets of the solar system. The existence of regularities in the distribution of planets in the Solar System was recognized long ago. This was Kepler’s main motivation in his search for planetary isomorphisms.

The Titius-Bode law (rn = 0.4 + 0.3 × 2n) was the first empirical attempt at describing these regularities, and was followed by several other proposals. The discovery of similar structures in the distribution of the satellites of the great planets led to a revival of interest for such studies, and to the hope that indeed a physical mechanism was at work. Now we can add a topological why to the how and when of metric space measure:

Those planets are in the nodes between gravitational waves of different frequency/amplitude and the solar system’s orbital plane in which planets feed, ‘deforming’ space-time, as they follow their static gravitational orbits; as electrons are in the nodes of their quantum waves, fine-tuned by the secondary levels they access according to the strength of the electromagnetic waves they exchange with their environment. For the same reasons stars should in the nodes of gravitational waves caused by galactic black holes.

In the graph we draw the 2 fundamental wave lengths that could explain the distances between planets: a high frequency, short gravitational wave of 0.33 AU could explain the positions of ferromagnetic, inner planets on its nodes. While 2 low frequency long wavelengths at 5 and 10 AU, could explain the position of bigger, and lighter gaseous planets. Since Jupiter is located at 5 AU, Saturn at 10 AU, Uranus at 20 AU, Neptune at 35 AU, Pluto at 40 AU; and as I predicted a decade ago, we have found a new planet, which I called then Chronos, ‘the last of the titans’ at 100 AU, in the limit of the solar system, ‘renamed’ Selma (-;.

– G-waves explain why planets have ecliptic orbits with an inclination on its axis, which is a natural orientation if they are receiving curved G-waves with a certain angle through its polar axis. In that regard, the rings of gaseous planets in the point of maximal activity of those waves (Jupiter and Saturn) and the spiral vortices of galaxies, could act as ‘antennae’ for those waves at star and galactic level.

– Those waves might cause, as all lineal movements do, a cyclical vortex around them, originating the condensation of planetary nebulae. While in galaxies their wave structure seems to originate the different densities of stars in their nodal zones.

– Planets suffer catastrophic changes in their magnetic fields, probably produced by changes in the directionality of those waves, emitted through the tropical dark spots of the sun.

There are advanced mathematical models of gravito-magnetism that have unified both type of waves, departing from Einstein’s work. Thus energetic ‘gravito-magnetic’ waves might cause a change in planetary magnetic fields as a magnetic field changes the spin of an atom that aligns itself with the field. For example, Uranus is tumbled and it has lost most of its magnetic field: perhaps it was knocked-out and relocated by a G wave.

Lineal magnetism is in fact in complex physics of multiple planes of space-time the intermediate SæxTo force that ‘transcends’ from the gravitational to the electromagnetic scale: for example, electromagnetic light or ferromagnetic atoms like iron should absorb gravitational Entropy through their magnetic fields.

– Solar spots are the probable source of those waves. Yet its origin might be the central core of the star or the activity of the central black hole, whose G-waves might be absorbed and re-emitted by the star. We cannot perceive G-waves directly; but magnetic storms, solar winds and the highly energetic electromagnetic flows and particles that come from the sun’s spots, might be its secondary effects. In the same way we only perceive indirectly the waves of dark Entropy emitted by black holes that position the stars of spiral galaxies, by observing the mass and radiation dragged by those waves.

– Those catastrophes might cause the climatic changes that modulate the evolution of life on Earth, since we already know that the activity of sun spots affects the temperature of the Earth.

– G-waves could structure the galaxy and its stars in the way electromagnetic impulses structure a crystalline atomic network, ordering the distance between its molecules: electromagnetic waves also feed with Entropy and information those crystal webs. For example, electromagnetic waves cause the vibration of quartzs, which absorb Entropy from light and vibrate, emitting ‘maser-like’, highly ordered discharges of electromagnetism. We observe similar maser beams in neutron stars, called for that reason pulsars.

Recap. Gravitational waves produced by black holes control the location of stars and planets, and its spin/orientation through smaller gravito-magnetic waves.

Organic Patterns in the Galaxy. The why of G-waves.

The closest homology of the 2 dual networks of the galaxy is with an atom in which the central nucleon with max. density of gravitational information and the external electronic membrane interact in a middle space-time vacuum through gravitational forces and electromagnetic photons.

Another self-similarity between scales of multiple space-times might be established in complex analysis between the galaxy and a simple ‘cellular’ organism, which introduces elements of complex biology in astronomy obviously more difficult to accept from a mechanist perspective).

Following the cellular or physiological homologies, the network of dark, informative matter and gravitational Entropy, connected to black holes, surrounds and controls the stars’ electromagnetic Entropy. We know that it was formed first and then guided the creation of electromagnetic Entropy, so we can observe it indirectly and deduce its form from the highly quantized shape of the filaments of light-galaxies that were formed around dark matter (right graph). Thus dark matter acts in a similar way to the RNA that shapes and controls the Golgi membranes of the cell or the nervous system that guides and builds the morphology of the body; while the network of stars and electromagnetic – the slower Entropy that produces the substances of galaxies – surrounds those strands of dark matter. In the cell’s homology ribosomes that create most products of the cell are pegged to those membranes.

We shall consider briefly here 2 of those controversial hypothesis: The possibility that black holes perceive gravitation and the chains of causality between the different scales of the Universe, self-similar to the chains of causality between cells and bodies.

– The most controversial element of a cosmological model based in G-waves is the existence of gravitational information that allows strange, neutron stars and black holes and maybe in the future evolved planets such as the Earth through its machine systems to perceive and move at will within a static field of gravitation.

On the Earth animals use light as information and dominate plants, which use it as Entropy. The hypothesis of complex cosmology is that stars are ‘gravitational plants’ that merely feed and curve gravitational space-time, while Worm Holes are ‘gravitational animals’, which are able to process gravitation as information and control and shape with gravitational waves the form of galaxies, their territorial space-time. They are in that sense extremely simple plants and animals. A more proper comparison would be with a cell, where the DNA molecules are the Worm Holes, the informative masses of physical space; and the mitochondria that produce energetic substances, the stars.

Thus frozen, quark stars could be ‘gravitational perceivers’ in the cosmological realm, as animals are light perceivers in the Earth’s crust and DNA perceives van der Waals forces in the cellular realm.

On the other hand stars would be plant-like, floating in the sea of gravitation, used as Entropy of their motion, feeding on interstellar gas, as planckton does, floating in the sea of water.

Do black holes perceive gravitation as complex animals perceive light, instinctively or mechanically, as DNA perceives the forces of the cell? They probably gauge gravitation in very simple ‘forms’, as a cellular DNA-system, much simpler than the brain of animals, perceives its territorial cell.

That is the supremacy of man in a relative universe were size is less important than form: While all systems process information, man is a summit of form and hence one of the most conscious species. Yet black holes have enough quark complexity to act/react to informative flows, as they seek Entropy to feed on – our electronic Entropy. This hypothesis has experimental proofs, since pulsars and black holes emit gravitational waves and we have observed many black holes following erratic paths through the galaxy, which defy the tidal, regular orbits of stars.

In that sense, multiple space times theory considers that in the same way light waves are the Entropy of plants and the information of animals, gravitational waves move stars and inform black holes, the most evolved celestial bodies, which emit or feed on the Entropy and information provided by those gravitational waves.

Further on, gravitational waves emitted by black holes might reproduce matter on the cores of stars and planets:

If those gravitational waves degenerate easily into quark matter as the jets of quasars show, they could also become converted into matter in the super fluid cores of stars and the crystalline centers of planets, in a process inverse to the Lorenz Transformations; since tachyons acquire more mass when they slow down, trapped by those superfluid and crystalline vortex.

Thus, as light is converted into Entropy in plants, stars and planets will create their ‘amino acids’, quark matter, in those processes. Thus, dark Entropy, tachyon strings would decelerate into c-speed gluons that would reproduce quarks; (as electromagnetic waves become photons and electrons).

There is also a mechanism by which those planets and stars ‘jump’ or change their spin position under the effect of gravitational waves, as electrons do under a magnetic field: the core of stars are made of super fluid helium and the core of planets of iron crystals, which are the only atoms that can absorb the Entropy of a gravito-magnetic field to change its motion.

Finally, all those events will have a ‘why’ in the 4 arrows of the organic Universe; since they would represent the feeding, matter reproduction, informative perception and social location within the galactic or planetary network of celestial bodies, equivalent to the 4 whys of the 4 quantum numbers, described before.

Recap. Gravitational waves accomplish the 6 arrows of time for celestial bodies, as the 4 quantum numbers describe those arrows for electrons.

 

Hierarchical scales between celestial bodies.

The synchronicity between all those cycles, which we established for all systems as a series of symbiotic chains between the bigger organisms and its cellular parts also synchronizes the central black hole with its star system. Let us remember those chains:

The rules of those complex chains are simple. It is a fact that informative cycles are shorter than energetic cycles, which are shorter than reproductive cycles, which are shorter than the cycles of social evolution of a species. So there is causal chain between the 4 cycles of all entities:

Max. Speed: Informative cycle > Energetic cycle (feeding) > Reproductive cycle >Evolving cycle

Yet at the same time, the smaller the species is the faster its cycles are. So there is a reversed scale:

Max. cyclical Speed:Minimal cells > Organisms > Social systems

This means that cycles of wholes and cellular parts are chained by those different speeds into symbiotic chains; since the parts need the Entropy and information of the whole, on which they depend.

For example, in most cases the feeding/energetic cycle of the whole organism determines the reproductive cycle of the cellular element, which requires the Entropy of the organism to reproduce and does so much faster than the whole organism; so a cell reproduces each day, which is the time cycle of feeding of its whole organism and so on. Thus, the ‘slow’ fields of Entropy and information of the bigger wholes determine the activity of the ‘reproductive and social’, fast cycles of ‘cells’.

Thus in any ‘scalar system’ of parts and wholes, the ‘Entropy of the superorganism or species of the macro-plane becomes in/form/ation, feeding the inferior scale, causing a symbiotic chains between the whole and the parts. The most obvious, extreme case is the fact that the Entropy detritus of bigger animals are informative food for lower insects and bacteria.

If we apply this concept to the gravitational waves of black holes, it is obvious that they function as information for black holes but act as feeding Entropy for stars and maybe planets that ‘grow’, transforming that Entropy into cyclical vortex of mass.

Further on, the calculated period of those waves show the synchronicity of the cycles/arrows of Entropy, form and reproduction of the different cellular scales of the galactic superorganism, which are tuned to each other.

Thus we can consider a hypothetical chain between the 3 scales of the Universe, the human scale, the solar system and the galactic scale. The specific event we are studying is the relationship between a fast, informative cycle of a black hole and a medium, energetic cycle of a solar system, which defines a reproductive, heating cycle of planetary systems. According to those synchronic chains, the reproductive cycles of life in planets are related to energetic cycles in sunspots, regulated by the shortest, faster, informative cycle of the galactic Black hole. That curious prediction, dating from 1994 was proved a few years ago:

Chinese astronomers detected that the galactic black hole has a minimal cycle of periodic activity of 11 years… It coincides with the sun spots’ cycle of 11 years, which coincides with the 11 years’ rotational period around the Sun of its bigger planet and main G-wave receptor, Jupiter that has a huge magnetic field, 19.000 times bigger than the Earth’s field and an enormous inner heat coming from its center, still unexplained by conventional cosmology. Yet if the black hole is connected to its stars by those waves that regulate the sun’s magnetic activity, which feeds Jupiter’s magnetic field, G-waves could explain why Jupiter has a bigger magnetic field, inner radiation and spatial size than any other planet. Further on, the sun’s spot cycles regulate the magnetic field of the Earth and the climatic changes that affect our life with longer cycles of cold and hot weather.

We might say recalling a Hindi parable that the blink of Vishnu’s eye (the rotating cycle of the galaxy) is a drop of sweat on the sun (its energetic cycle), which is the whole existence of a human being (a reproductive cycle of the Earth).

Due to the lack of space-time of these lectures we won’t consider in detail the reproductive body of the galaxy, its cyclical sun systems that feed on interstellar gas to create atoms and have also as a ternary topology – the center occupied by the star, a ‘reproductive space’ by cyclical planets and the external halo is the Oort planar sphere of lineal comets. Instead we will deal with the most fascinating cosmic object of them all, the black hole, informative mass-vortex and top predator species of the galaxy…

Recap. The galaxy is self-similar to an organic cell where black holes play the role of DNA-RNA systems and stars, mitochondria. The cycles of feeding, perceiving, reproducing and social structure of black holes and stars are related by gravito-magnetic waves. 

CONCLUSION. The ternary Method to discern between big bangs. Which big-bang fits better our cosmic data? Comparing them.

Indeed, the form of each scalar big-bang is the same, and it is remarkably identical in the supposed big-bang of the Universe; since both have an electromagnetic ‘orbital’ of dense ¥-rays, the fractal equivalent to the electron nebulae on the left. So how can we decide to which scale the ‘background radiation’ picture belongs?

We find the answer on the fact that quasar big-bangs (cycle of creation and destruction of the center of galaxies), is 10 to 20 billion years, and the supposed cosmic big-bang picture is 13.5 billion years. The same age that our galaxy, whose minimal time is 13.8 ± 4 billion years for the rich metal stars on BD +17° 3248. This is counter-intuitive: bigger systems in 5D live slower. For example, the smallest big-bang that of the left picture (beta decay), happens after a neutron life-span of 15 minutes. In that regard, the quantum, galactic and Universal scale should be if there is a Universal Scale on the same 5D time ‘slow down relationship’: Λ = Sp x Tƒ = K.

So the cosmic ‘big-bang’ should be at least one order of time-space older, which depending on the number of dimensions, should be 10, 100 or 1000 times more. Still considering the absolute minimal scale of time in 5D, 10 times longer (so civilizations live 800 years and humans 80) this gives us 140.000 million years, which stretching.

Now the 4 big-bangs are quite fascinating because of their similarities. Consider for example the relationship between the big-bang of a Neutron, or ‘beta decay’ and that of a star or Nova or Super-nova (second picture of Crab nebulae, the most famous supernova explosion of our galaxy).

A beta decay produces a photon, a neutrino, an electron and a proton, which expand the nucleon and in a double beta decay are hold together creating a hydrogen atom.

Now, a Supernova produces a black hole, which as we will see has the exact ‘Schwarzschild radius’ than a proton in 5 D Metric, a massive expansion of its plasma expelled to form the nebulae we see, which is the equivalent to the electron, a burst of Gamma rays, which are photons of high energy and an even higher burst of about 1059 neutrinos, an astounding quantity, which represent up to 10% of the mass of the star.

Those are thus the same elements of a beta-decay, but observed from our perspective as a single ‘particle’ in the lower scale and as a myriad of them in the upper scale. And yet the proportion of energy is similar.

A Beta decay expels a neutrino with 0.76 MeV energy-mass, which is 1/10th of the mass of the quarks that conform the proton collapsed into a neutron star in the nova or a black hole in the supernova.

There is thus no doubt that we are talking of 2 similar phenomena in 2 scales of the 5th dimension.

The dual big-bang: inflaton field in 5D metric: time decelerates as space accelerates.

There are in that choice, considering unlikely the organic nature of the Universe with a dark matter network of ‘nervous information’ and a ‘blood network of electromagnetic energy’ – but not completely eliminated given the clear filaments between galaxies, which remind us a tissue of cells, two different degrees of expansion.

In the galactic quasar big bangs, while there might have been a first atom in the long time ago distance, the growth of the Universe is slow. The Universe is in a steady state rather eternal situation as we are likely just a hydrogen anti-atom of the net scale, whose ‘laws’ of physics might differ slightly from ours, something which can be explored with the analysis of dark energy waves as ‘electromagnetic waves of the next scale’. And so on.

In the cosmic big bang as it is, there is a hyperinflation initial phase, which would be interpreted as a hyper-gravitational force, expanding at hyper luminal speeds. Or in terms of the metric of the 5th dimension, as a massive death process: Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ = K, hence in the Planck scale of this hyper-gravitational force, Min. Tƒ is a quanta of Planck time, 10-43, in which the death of the Prior Hyper-black hole expanded 1043 times according to the metric of the fifth dimension, and then as it expanded time slowed down in its quanta till reaching the present relative Sp=Tƒ balance between time and space parameters. So again, only 5D physics explains that wonder of the super-fast expansion in super-minimal time:

image026Our Universe (line below) might be born in a dual fractal big bang of gravitational space-times (inflationary state) and fractal big bangs of light-membranes (quasars that explode galaxies).

All those homologous fractal big bangs of gravitational dark Entropy and light create the same inflationary Universe developed by Linde & Guth8 but, as in the case of electronic nebulae, interpreted as fractal parts of an electron co-existing in the same Universe, instead of Everett’s absurd interpretation of multiple universes a fractal dual big-bang rationalizes the data of the inflationary big-bang, introduces the Planck scale as the minimal string-size of a gravitational action, which will self-reproduce as it expands and validates the fractal Unification that converts each galaxy in an atom of the gigantic Universal scale, which we only perceive till the limit of reproduction of light waves (mean life 1010-11 y.)

In the graph, the discontinuous fractal structure of multiple space-times implies that in the same manner there are many quasar big-bangs (later Hoyle’s interpretation of the big-bang process); there might be many fractal gravitational big-bangs, in a huge Universe in which each galaxy is a relative atom. Again this interpretation gives meaning to the standard inflationary Universe, whose enormous size wouldn’t be the sum of a series of parallel Universes but the same Universe made of fractal gravitational/ quasar big bangs. In the graph, those 2 cosmic fractal big bangs give birth to a huge universe with101012 ‘galactic atoms’.

The fractal theory of a dual big bang is thus self-similar to the inflationary theory but without the logic errors of multi-universes. It postulates a first gravitational big bang of dark Entropy at z=10-100 c (which seems to be the limit of redshift observed in the limits of perception of our cosmos).

In the graph, the birth of the ‘huge universe’ (no longer the hyper-universe) would have taken place from a black hole of the minimal scale of size of 10-35 m. and maximal Planck’s density during a gravitational, superluminal big bang that split space-time into 1011 different fractal bubbles of gravitation – many universal cells like ours in which light universes would later develop. Those gravitational bubbles, while connected by non-local gravitation will not interact with light since the mean life of a reproductive light ray, as that of the stars it creates is around 1010-11 years and so light from those far away ‘atomic galaxies’ cannot reach this one.

Recap. There are not multi-universes but fractal Universes created with 2 self-similar big bangs in 2 scales, the gravitational and light scale.

So far so good, very clever and one must say beautiful. but the data does not quite fit. And so we will latter on considering some squeaky sounds of the data, which fit better into a local quasar big bang.

Which is from an objective point of view far more logic – to think that we see only a local galactic –neutron big bang of an eternal, vaster, quasi infinite Universe, where man is just in some photon of a hydrogen-like atom NO seeing much of it, just the distance of the lifespan of a light ray, which dies away and erases its information about 1011 years after birth.

Again we do NOT claim to have the solution, but rather as T.Πalways do, enlighten the whys of the big-bang (the cosmic neutron scale) and give an alternative (a myriad of galactic neutrons with a local B.R. existing perhaps in some hydrogen like cloud which might extend to a much larger distance beyond the darkness of the death of light where information no longer reaches us).

And that is what we shall do in this post. Because a careful analysis of the information about the big bang seems to reduce the scale of what they are studying to the ‘galactic cycle of big-bangs and big crunches’ known as the quasar cycle. And though this I know is disliked (Only Fred Hoyle hold it), T.Œ has no problems with human dissent. Its test of truth is purely objective, scientific methodology. on those grounds the big bang fails at cosmic level.

Why? For many reasons. The most obvious is that the picture that portraits the galaxy in the center is exactly the same that the right picture of the background radiation, which on top ‘OBVIOUSLY’ is radiation measured within the galaxy. And that the period for the big bang on the right is exactly the same period for the quasar cycle of a galaxy (observed through the measure of quasar cycles all over the Universe). So all seems to indicate we are observing a quasar cycle NOT a cosmic cycle.

Let us see it comparing those periods with the periods of a neutron star and a neutron (the two big-bangs on the left).

A small neutron has a 15-minute decay cycle, a Neutron star forms and explodes within at least a few million years, normally a few billion.

this is what 5D metric tell us: Max. Sp = Min. Tƒ, so the Neutron has a much slower life cycle because it is bigger.

Hence the Universe must have a much slower cycle than a galaxy, which is bigger.

Now a quasar cycle of a galaxy is 15 billion, which is exactly the big-bang age of the cosmic model

But the Universe should have a 15 ‘zillion’ cycle NOT also 15 billion, as a galaxy, as it is much larger.

The whole ALWAYS lasts much more than its ‘finitesimals’. Thus we conclude the right picture belongs to our galaxy, NOT to the Universe: it has the same form, the same time length, and it is obtained in the same space place (our galaxy) at the same 5D scale.

So it is the picture of the background radiate on left by local quasar cycle, perhaps of the central black hole of this galaxy or perhaps of a super galaxy in the local group. Now this is in essence the ‘forest’ picture of it, with 5D metric and known known space-time parameters. We will now go into a few important details and proofs all of which reinforce that perfect picture.

There is another recent test also which cast doubts on the cosmic big bangs. Astronomers wanted in the ‘time picture observe shadows’ provoked by huge galaxies that interfere with the background radiation coming from the wall of fire. The artistic rendering helps to understand why there should be ‘shadows’, as this is the ‘spatial perspective’ of the time big-bang – which is allowed by the symmetry between all space and time states on 5 D (merely accepted without any deep understanding in present physics): when we put in time the earth at the center, huge galaxies should screen the radiation of the wall of fire or external membrane, but they don’t. So it seems the radiation is local.

And so on and so on. So it is on known-known astrophysical data not on 5D physics where the cosmic big-bang finds its problems, and it says a lot on the human desire to know it all and accept myths and religious beliefs that astrophysicists shun off so often contradictions of the cosmic big-bang.

Now it must be clear that for 5D physics both make sense, as the Universe IS just a scale above the galaxy. So all those big-bang prove 5 D physics, and its ternary symmetries and ∆±1 scales, the ages in time (Es>ST>Tƒ) and organic, spatial simultaneous Sp<ST<It parts hat define the system of a galaxy, easy with the same generator equation it defines all other system of the Universe.

And all in all, we hold a final ‘decision’ on future further analysis by the Webb telescope which finally! Will be launched, to get more information of far remote in time and space events. But again the trick of this duality is as follows:

If light dies as 5D physics considers (all space-time entities do have a finite duration in time), at around 1011 light years it is impossible to distinguish the effects of a dying light – the spatial asymmetric view (red shift to infinity and final black out beyond 1011 distance, hyper abundance of very young quasars at that distance because of its higher brilliance and the mission of ‘young light of maximal energy-life span) from a cosmic big-bang effect, the temporal antisymmetric view: red shift to the original explosion, birth at + 1011 years and black out before birth)!!!

This if a fascinating fat of many space-time dualities in 5D Physics: the explanation in time and its symmetry in still space are extremely difficult to differentiate when we do NOT have enough information about them. So in atomic 5D physics we shall see how a phenomena which ‘smells’ all the way as a time antisymmetry – the color forces of quarks – CANNOT really be qualified either as time or space; so the conclusion in those cases is that the explanation is a complementary ‘wave’ ST-analysis.

On the other hand there are phenomena that the ‘spatial-mental’ bias of all forms of knowledge clearly mistakes as a spatial force, when it is a time trans-form-ation (the weak force, which transforms quarks into other ones). In the case of the big bang it is in the details where reason tilts towards a local big bang. Because ultimately what we are trying to figure out is a ‘symmetry’ on 5D scale.

What scale is the scale of the big bang? The ∆-3 galactic scale or the ∆-4, cosmic scale?

But and this is the question poised here – a quasar cycle of a galactic or super-galactic black hole exploded back 14 billion years ago, in the local Virgo Cluster would produce exactly the same undistinguishable phenomena, whereas the inflation state would be the explosion of gravitational waves, carrying a massive neutrino background ahead of the wave, laying down the first ‘structural’ space, while a massive quark-gluon soup of strangelet matter during the quark epoch would reach the limits of the galaxy to create the halo, and then after the Planck epoch, the decay of the intermediate matter from top to bottom to charm to strange to up and down quark would establish our galactic ‘body’.

In brief, the epochs of the big-bang are mimetic to those of a quasar big-bang, and really the only way to decide which one happened is in the details – the facts that we are making local observations that the BG Radiation looks like the galaxy that the time of the cosmic big-bang is the same of a galactic quasar cycle, that the density of the big-bang is the same that the density of matter of a galaxy (Not of the whole cosmos), that the radiation of the big-bang does NOT leave shadows crossing outer galaxies etc.

There are so many details of parameters that fit better the galaxy, and we shall explain with some detail that as much as we would like to back with 5D physics the cosmic big bang to get maybe finally some recognition in our old age, before exit mundi of all this awesome work, a bit of a selfie here (-; ts, ts, we are not selling us cheap at this time, sorry guys. The cosmic big bang is a fake.

 

We could of course accept the big bang would be much better for 5D physics – to go with the flow. But that is too easy.

It is far more rigorous to do a thorough analysis of the big bang with T.Πand the scientific method, to figure out if astrophysicists are really observing the whole Universe as a super-beta decay 4 scale up of the 5d Universe, or perhaps they are overreaching what we perceive experimentally.

Each symmetry of 5d physics IS THE SAME ternary ‘simple’ game, but data does not fit for a cosmic big-bang.

Each scale just introduces in a Universe of infinite monads with different perspectives, those different ‘ternary organisms’ of physics, but each one must be coherent with data and hence as data does not fit in a single entropy cosmology, data makes even more strident the point of view of present cosmology.

And the proofs are overwhelming from the 4 necessary perspectives that structure any Universe:

The spatial, mathematical perspective; the logic, temporal perspective, the organic 5 Dimensional perspective (as a system co-exists in 3 5 d planes due to its multi-organic functionality) and finally the mental mathematical perspective which must be objective, but of course understand the limits of the language, and the specific ‘frame of reference’ we use to make maths with.

So if we can describe a fact from all those perspectives, certainly it will exist. And indeed ‘big-bangs=death of matter’ exist in all scales. But an only entropy world does NOT. It would have simply died away. All systems must be ternary and complementary in space-time and scales to be.

As any being tends to exist because it can play all those roles within a larger whole, and it is sustained by those scales within its own structure. And this means we shall offer an organic vision of galaxies, a perspective from its central black hole dominant point of view, a mathematical perspective and topological analysis of its form, and a logic, temporal perspective of its evolution, to fully describe it.

And so we used all those perspectives to study the larger whole (the cosmos) and the lower parts (its stars).

 

In that regard, all systems must be observed in those symmetries, of which the most important is the 5D symmetry of the being as a whole made of smaller parts and as a part of bigger wholes, which in physical systems are the atomic, electromagnetic quantum perspective, the individual, material, thermodynamic perspective and the cosmic, gravitational perspective.

The Universe manifests all its beauty in the symmetry between the lowest and largest limits of human perception; the ‘finitesimal’ atom and the ‘whole’ galaxy.

In ¬Æ there are not infinitesimals as all planes of the 5th dimension have a limit in its smallest perceived particles that become ‘fractal points’, ‘finitesimals’, but when enlarged do have volume as Non-Euclidean points crossed by a finite number of parallel space-time cycles.

image077It all depends on the relative perception of the point from below as an ∆-1 finitesimal or above, as a whole.

Those fractal Œ feel the center, from its Œo scale, but when seen from below, as œ-1 are in physics h-quanta, point-particles and point-atoms; in biology, point-cells; in sociology point-humans – indistinguishable from the upper scale of wholes, which are for h-quanta, point particles, for point atoms, molecular matter, for cells, super-organisms for humans nations and civilizations that handled them with their ‘physiological networks’, economic systems of credit and political systems of citizens.

This Absolute relativity principle is at the core of the duality between atoms and galaxies, which are the 2 limits of human ‘scientific perception of the Universe’.

Below those limits all is speculation about the absolute cosmos and possible more under h-Planck scale of lineal space and cyclical time, what physics call open and closed strings.

The limits of stientific scales: STrings or galatoms?

T-Duality in STring theory expresses 5D metric: $ð=K, as it merely means that a slow huge time cycle in the ∆+¡ planes is equivalent to the sum of fast ð-cycles, winding in-form-ation in the ∆-1 plane. S-Duality similarly relate two theories whose coupling constants (strength of its attraction) is g and 1/g, its ‘finitesimal part’. This ‘hierarchy’ problem again, as we have shown in the equation of unification, merely indicates that the g-theory is a higher ∆+1 plane, and defines therefore a total of 3 Planes for strings, to give origin to the ‘superstring organism’ of M-theory

The S-T dualities and 5D entangled theories put together with the 11 Disomorphisms of M-Therory makes string theory when properly corrected for relational space-time and 5D metric, the likely limit of reality made of lineal $trings of formal motion and $ð-rings of cyclical motion; the absolute simple limits of reality combined into the infinite vibrations of time space we all are.

All this said an important theme of 5Ð is the consideration on how many scales do exist, and what are the limits if the scales are infinite of the repetition of those scales. I am on this of the general view that it is likely the Universe can be mirrored by the 2 simplest forms of motion: a rotary motion or closed string, ‘§ð-ring;’ in the always modified jargon of 5D and a lineal motion or open STring -$tring – the two limits of topology in space and time of 5D:

 Type I STrings have 5 interactions easily interpreted as its 5 Ðimotions

We observe that the multiple dimensions of string theory are nothing but the ternary scalar dimensions of 5D: 3 human dimensions, 3 quark dimensions and 3 boson dimensions (the component of quarks). And we shall see how the Branes which might be considered those ‘larger pentagonal’ particles unfolded are ‘entangled’ connected by the bosons… And all is ultimately about the actions=dimotions of space-time communicated by those strings of ‘energy’. So ultimately when we considering some aspects of string theory of the fourth line we shall see that is just 5D with a very complicated jargon due to the lack of conceptual understanding of physics, and excellent mathematics, which however lack any ‘restriction’ to distinguish as Einstein put it ‘what is mathematical truth and what is physical reality’. So we stick with 5D, a far more real, better conceptualized model.
String theory in that sense is a fascinating theme, which however requires too many corrections to be worthy beyond physics:
1) To correct the errors of being Newtonian, that is using absolute space-time in its formulation 2)to simplify and clarify its math, putting them in relationship to 5D, which is a ginormous task both of mathematical work and of penpal, congress activity to ‘convert the believers’… which in any case I can’t do at this time and age, given the philosophy of stience that considers the highest stience history, the study of human super organisms. The limits of string theory are in that sense, the same of classic physics. Its purpose deluded: to unify all other particles and systems, indeed, at first it seems a great advance. After all we just have a Lagrangian with a Length-parameter (the string Planck’s length), and voila all comes from its vibrations… in 11 dimensions, which means we must define all modes of vibrations and all dimensions, and this is what makes the whole thing risible: what we lost in variation for sake of unification into a single length parameter, we gain in new complexity for new dimensions and vibrational modes, making absurd the concept that string theory ‘simplifies’ and unifies all to a ‘length’.
Moreover, as usual, as time is NOT understood in physics, there is NO revolution at all of concepts. All those dimensions are ‘spatial dimensions’.
So ultimately we are just in the same frame – the only real discovery is the concept that a point-particle is a fractal point, that is it has volume, is a closed string cycle (or an open one). So instead  of worldliness we make world sheets, but alas, is just a locomotion, not a world cycle.

So the string revolution is really not such revolution.   It all consists in doing exactly the same mathematical manipulations of modern physics to describe reality from that ‘spatial length’:
I.e. we define a string action. We will then proceed to construct invariants, or symmetries, for this action. Using Noether’s theorem we will then find the conserved quantities of the theory, namely the stress energy tensor and Hamiltonian. We then quantize the string in the usual canonical fashion and calculate its mass spectrum and streamline all the new parameters, by making them a background spacetime, in which the string propagates, in dimension 10, 11, 26… We then proceed to quantize the string theory… And so really the ‘goal’ of unification is just not there, and the need for making strings ‘space-time’ beings, is negated by the background of multiple dimensions.
This said I believe string theory in its proper format, due to the many parallelisms with 5D. It is almost magic to study string theory and find when properly translated that all its laws are mirror laws of 5D: from its duality of open-locomotion strings vs. closed, information strings to its 5D entangled versions, mirror symmetries of each other, which come together into the 11 Disomorphisms of M-Theory, through its ‘vital properties’, similar to our 5Dimotions (strings move, reproduce, as they grow when energy feeds them, evolve socially into branes, etc.) to its S and T dualities, which properly understood are the key to the symmetries between the 5D views of any species of the Universe.
In that sense although a complete formulation of M-theory is not known, physicists agree that the theory should describe two and five-dimensional objects called branes (: ST and 5Ð branes, that is) and should be approximated by eleven-dimensional supergravity at low energies (one of the many inflationary formulations of the ¡±4 intergalactic dark space).

Ouroboros the Universal Snake, bites its tail on the string quantum and cosmological self-similar scales, as perceived from the human ∆o mind. Metaphysical thought would then argue if those scales are real, or just mental, that is, the loss of information in the perception of scales make humans extract the same information from the upper and lower 10±ˆ30 scales

For a while back in the 90s I worked on the proper corrections needed for M-theory to work according to 5D, enough to say that its proper formulation in terms of closed clock Sðrings and open $trings, can theoretically wrap up a Universe of infinite planes, which repeat themselves. But I never completed the model for the obvious reasons that there are far more important research in 5D that trying to work out the ‘errors’ of physics in their conceptualization of time-closed strings and space-open ones and its social membranes.
String theory is thus the most obvious candidate to the be ‘unobserved limits’ of reality, where a  series of superstrings connected to circles of galaxies, will be the best way to describe the local universe, as the graphs of Lanakea shows, and viceversa, micro strings are the best way to describe.
So if we want to consider ‘stientific, experimental truths’, we should start physics beyond STring metaphysics and consider in the nested Universe the truly observable reality of the galaxy-atom, of which we observer fully the ‘vital energy’ between the dark world of the Universe past the $>c and ð<0 barrier of lineal motion and temperature order of our world. We shall call this super organism the galatom and consider physics the stience that studies it.
This of course is a very different view on physics that the present view – the philosophy of all sciences based in the wrong concept of constructivism; and the more accurate view of the XIX c. regarding what human physic(ist)s do: the study of motion – locomotion and entropy.
In any case it is essential for physicists to understand also the inflationary nature of languages of information, soon to be explained, as kaleidoscopic mirrors of a single universe, and so well observed in the proposed unification of all string theories by the 11th parameters of M-theory.  We will put an example of it, when unifying forces (charges and masses). Information IS inflationary and as any system follows the same laws, as time passes, systems ‘AGE’, so do languages that enter a third age of excessive information, metalinguistics and repetitive patterns as old men do, ‘DETACHING ITSELF’ from reality into its own syntax=memory.
This 3rd age of mathematics only recognized by lobachevski and Godel, who proved the need for experimental evidence, is the true ‘old age sickness’ of mathematical physics. 

For that reason we shall not work the -4v posts that should deal with the dark world of strings, neutrinos, gravitons, Higgs bosons and dark entropy=energy (not so much dark matter, obviously, quark-ultradense matter). As all stiences are equally important; and string theory corrections are complex math… So ultimately IS much better to start off saying simply that the origin of reality are $trings, lines of spatial motion and Sð-rings, rotary clocks of time; both below (quantum strings) and above (cosmological strings), as those we can observe in our region of the Universe:
This of course is a very different view on physics that the present view – the philosophy of all sciences based in the wrong concept of constructivism; and the more accurate view of the XIX c. regarding what human physic(ist)s do: the study of motion – locomotion and entropy.
All this said, humans have committed a very obvious error on their perception of reality – to believe that their clock of time, the lineal mechanical systems deviced by Galileo are the only time of the Universe, just because we invent those clocks and used them to equalize all time cycles of reality. And to believe that what we see with telescopes is the only reality, denying also the duality of motion and dimension, time and space, from the very inception of physics. 

It is in that sense quite remarkable that it works for ‘weak fields’ which are exactly the gravitational fields that exist in the galatom between the halo of strange matter and the center of BCB and top quark atoms, as it is there where gravitation as Einstein talked of it, makes truly sense, given the fact that inside the black hole/atom past the event horizon we enter the regimes of entropic and organic evolution of matter into heavier quarks and decaying products, shown in the previous paragraphs. So gravitation strictly speaking indeed  is shown in gravitomagnetism, albeit with a different in the ‘spin orientation’ of the gravitomagnetic force, which points once more to the likely ‘antimatter nature’ of the galatom as an atom – given the fact that most mass as in anti hydrogen atom is positioned on the orbital strangelets. 

So when modeling the cosmos, it is likely more meaningful to consider the upper scale of galatoms, one of anti atoms, with both repulsive gravitation and repulsive or attractive charges, depending on the ‘nakedness’ of the black holes – so naked singularities, that is black holes that have stripped off star content already its galaxy could be hunting attracted by the negative force of the strangelet cover those galactic antiparticles. It is of course needed a change of paradigm for professional astrophysicists to cast within the new model the enormous wealth of information observed on galactic behavior, which this author for obvious reasons cannot commit himself to do.

The biggest pending question being for all kind of metaphysical and epistemological reasons to determine the degree of self-similarity between both scales of the Universal fractal, once the distortions committed by the human different perspective into the small and the larger are reconsidered. MY view is though that we cannot either resolve that question, as if the scales go from particles into antiparticles, we would have to observe much better inside the gluon atom and beyond the antiparticle scales of galaxy to know if the fractal is self-similar so it is not infinite in different scales – and so we might even achieve immortality by repetition of our identical forms in infinite galatoms, or each scale is slightly different so the infinity is NOT only in scales, and time but also in ‘DIFFERENCES’ OF FORM. And we are unique variations of the game of exist¡once, never immortal.

RECAP. We have in a very few pages, in the simplest possible mathematical formulation resolved the fundamental questions pending on physics, from the Unification equation of charges and masses, to the reason why there are 3 families of masses and particles, to the reason why there are 3 type of celestial bodies, to the hierarchy problem of forces, as gravitation is a much ‘lighter’ cosmological scale with far less attractive power, to the question of why we see less antiparticles (which is the dead state of a particle, hence much shorter in time, so as we see less corpses than living, despite being the same number we see less antiparticles), to the question of c-speed that illuminates the bizarre nature of spin and entanglement, to the meaning of Universal constants, the conundrum of singularities, to a better more logic explanation of reality than the bizarre big-bang… All this should suffice for scientists to realize the importance of having a better foundational system of principles to explain reality. But as we know, since Kuhn’s ‘Scientific revolutions’, science is a human endeavor based in belief, repetition and routine, so it will take decades for physicists to change ‘their chip’ and accept 5D…

CONCLUSION

Lineal physics: entropy & big bang death  vs. eternal, cyclical time.


In the graphs, the scales of the Universe and the human being and its space-time symmetries, which the reader will observe are the same we used to describe the Universe.

Since we are all isomorphic organisms of 5D fractal space-time, and therefore the study of the scales of human beings, biology and history is more important than the study of the scales beyond the limits of human perception, as CERN does, since we are the most perfect super organism of the universe, the measure of all things, including the simpler and less perceived organisms of galaxies and atoms and beyond.

 

First, we must stress that Cosmology has a huge metaphysical component in its Greek sense – it is well beyond the limits of human perception, which we find to be the atom and the galaxy, beyond and within uncertainty and dark gravitational matter makes knowledge to say the ‘least’ incomplete.

Thus contrary to belief big-bang theories of the Universe and Cosmology in the widest sense do not belong to astro-physics, but still we can do science if we are minimally serious with the scientific method.

Then the cosmic big-bang likely falsehood, as a product of the ego-trips of physicists, follows from the available data on it. It does NOT contradict as we shall see 5D physics. On the contrary it would also validate it. So we are NOT against cosmic big-bang because 5D physics does not tolerate it but because plain good old’ science disproves it.

So we shall give an alternative physical theory of the Universe, which follows closer the T.Œ=Sc3‘ laws of truth of the scientific method (Objectivity, Logic-Linguistic reason, Experimental evidence; Minimalism (Occam’s razor), Correspondence (previous ‘true theories’, parts of the new one), Causal, cyclical predictability and Coherence (logic and mathematical reason).

Thus here we shall on one side prove that the big-bang does not follow all the elements of the T.Œ=Sc3‘ 4 legs of truths  in science (Objectivity, Logic, Evidence, Minimalism=Simplicity, Correspondence with previous theories, Causality & Ternary Complexity:

  • It is a clear creationist theory based in lineal time, two cultural traits of the western Germanic, biblical military cultures that invented it.
  • It is completely illogic and makes no sense at all – for god’s sake indeed, a single point from all was created..
  • It has not enough experimental evidence.
  • But it passes S: simplicity, initially but … when it was merely the drawing back of a lineal equation (H=Dv, Hubble’s red shift equation).  Yet at present as we learned more about the Universe, it requires all kind of ‘epicycles added ad hoc’ to fit the new data (dark matter and energy, accelerated expansion, inflationary first state, etc. So it no longer does fit Minimalism.
  • It does not correspond to physical and logic ‘consistent’ theories but only to religious ones – lineal Christian time and creationism.
  • And finally it lacks Causal cyclical predictability – it does not explain what was before and after; but the element it truly fails is one we normally consider a given for serious science, ‘logic and internal coherence’. It has none. Because indeed it is creationist ‘religious’, as it requires external creators.

The ego paradox.

Why astrophysicists then do not focus on the limits of known-unknowns.

The answer is the human ambition and anthropomorphic point of view, which is common to any of those Πthat feels himself the center of the Universe. It is the paradox of the ego. And we must introduce it because it is at the core of the ambition of cosmologists and its denial of true science when confronting the facts of his big-bang theory of it all.

Now a mind is defined by a simple equation:

O-mind (finitesimal) x ∞ time space cycles = Linguistic mapping of the Universe.

Thus a mind to fit the infinite time cycles in motion, reduces its dimensions and information to a series of bidimensional membranes of fixed form of information in a language used to map reality.

Humans do that with the infinite universe, reducing it to mathematical mappings. And thinking of course they are observing the ‘whole’. This is the recurrent theme of astrophysics – the denial of absolute relativity, as self-centered humans come back with a vengeance, with new ‘absolute frames of reference’. Now this absolute frame of reference is called the background radiation and the point of view is the creationist big bang.

And the proof of its falsity never mind because we do have to understand it all, and of course, when we do, we will be special beings within that whole. Since, the paradox of the ego tell us that:

‘Every finitesimal 0-mind perceives reality from its self-centered point of view, confusing the whole with the limited linguistic mind that perceives it’.

This is today the situation with the big-bang, falsified by innumerable proofs under the laws of the scientific method, but accepted as the ‘religion of physicists’, the new ‘religious gurus’ of our technological, ‘lineal civilizations.

Within the much larger frame of reference of T.Œ, all this resumes in the ego paradox. Humans MUST have an explanation for the whole, which makes it not so big, and rather controllable.

Experimentally is also the most natural conclusion, as its measure is taken locally also, around the Earth, origin could be then within the galaxy or the local group of galaxies, a mere turbulence of the clouds of gas and dark matter that surround the milky way. It is the first and most important of the 3 canonical proofs of the cosmic big bang. The second proof – the abundance of helium is equally explained by quasar big-bangs, as the equations of the big-bang ‘ages ‘are the same for the explosion of a black hole in the center of galaxies (in fact they are the reversed equations of the formation of a black hole, hence its process of entropic death), the 3rd proof, the age of the big-bang is falsified by the quasar cycle of birth and death of galaxies, which has a 10 to 20 billion years cycle.

And since we observe galaxies in a second cycle, the Universal big bang cannot be younger than a part of the Universe.

The 4th proof is the density of matter of the Universe, far lower than the one required for the big-bang which however is exactly the same density of matter of galaxies, once more proving the ‘local theory’ of a background radiation due to the explosion of a quasar galaxy – either ours, or a quasar of our local group; the 5th canonical proof is the red shift of light, which expands between galaxies, but again it is a lineal half-truth, which purposely ignores the warping of radiation into matter in the ecliptic of galaxies and the inverse blue shift flows jets of radiation that collapse and shrink space into matter coming from black holes (hence not arriving to Earth but seen laterally in most of them) and the natural death of light space-time, which has a life-death cycle similar to that of stars of around 10 billion years, explaining perfectly a first phase of red shift accelerated in the second phase o flight life (5 to 10 billion years), tracing the canonical 3 ‘ages of life’ of the 5D model of the Universe.

Yet the metaphysical proof is perhaps the most obvious: the birth of the entire Universe in a single point of space-time, just because we can run a lineal equation of the redshirts temperature of the present universe to the past with no limit till arriving to a ‘point’ of creation, is logically absurd; scientifically sick (as it requires a previous God-like creator) and natural only to the religious military ideologies of western science, dating back to Newton a pious believer in Yvwh and the lineal concept of time of Abrahamic religions and military science, who already considered a mechanist Universe the proof of the existence of the historic tribal God of the Hebrew.

The present revival of primitive idol-ogies of history thus must be studied NOT in astrophysics but in our section of history and the process of life and death of civilization, with its memorial revivalism in times of war and extinction

On my view astrophysicists have become believers, which will not reason, after a century of public awe as the new religious figures of mankind, and will never deny big-bang theory. Our life thought might be at stakes, as they will soon replicate a small quasar big bang at CERN.

Yet to fully grasp what physicists do at the LHC without much understanding of the process involved, we must go beyond present physics, outside the light space-time membrane of the galaxy, where the symmetry breaks between <c and > c speeds and <o K and > o k into…

 

 

 

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: