Home » ” 5D² » Epistemology







Foreword. Inflationary information vs. classic reality.

God is simple and not malicious’ Einstein

‘Simplicity is Genius’ Leonardo

S=T, l§

It is a mystery to me why nobody cares about 5D space-time organisms, and its simplex capacity to explain everything that exists through the symmetry between simultaneous space organisms and its ternary topologies and temporal ages guided by its physiological networks in worldcycles.

At the beginning of this long lonely adventure of thought I blamed myself thinking I didn’t explain it clearly. But latter on I realized it was not my problem but that of the human ego and its memorial forms of knowledge.

The mind is an isolated linguistic mirror which creates by iteration complicated forms often de-forming the simplicity, symmetry and beauty of reality when Space=time merge in balance between motion and form.

Essentially the mind is ‘inflationary’ and ‘complicated’ as it merely handles information in a small space multiplying its ‘forms’.

So information alone as a Kaleidoscopic mirror of reality can become as complex as it gets. but Nature departs from simple forms, the line and the cycle and limits its real combinations, leaving for the infinitesimal mind space, complicated theories of reality that cannot bend the motion that is the ultimate substance of it all. 

Huminds however do NOT recognise this fault of inflationary information. On the contrary they cherish it as a proof ‘of its intelligence’ above heavens and Earth. Only the highest minds of mankind come at the end of its journey as Einstein and Leonardo did to the realisation that the hidden ultimate principles of reality are simple symmetries, such as the S=T ultimate form of balance and survival tattooed in my self-portrait for 30 years.

Let us then make for starters a brief resume of the history of those huminds who searched for the ultimate simplest principles of reality, space and time.


History of ‘time-space’ Theory

I worked for years in the development of 5D³, a theory that tries to advance time theory without any significan advancement since Einstein, in a theme that seems very difficult for humans as you cannot shoot pictures of time as we do with space…

First we said that cyclical time carries the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. It follows that:

@: Psychological Time…

measures the speed processing information of minds. This change rate in electronic minds has the h unit of angular momentum, as a full time cycle for electrons and photons, two species of the same family: ∑photons=electron, measures a bit of information.

In that regard time has a simple meaning: change of position=motion and change of form. Whereas a present state is a state of repetitive motions, which seemingly does not change realities.

Subjective vs. objective time.

It follows that more than change, we measure its perception that can be cheated. So the perception of different changes makes time dual, subjective from the internal point of the perceiver, objective from the external point and multiple according to the point of perception.

It is then quite easy to reduce time change roughly as science does into external time-change or translation in space, the subject of physics and internal time-change or change in information, the subject of biology.

Subjective mind-time perception must then be related to the mind’s speed, processing information which defines its ‘beat’=bit of times=information. i.e. in humans is a second, the beat of heart, mind and legs steps.

It follows that faster systems with faster time clocks live longer, but often a huge family of beings have similar time durations. i.e. an insect that processes information 10 times faster has a longest span of life in its top predator species of 7 years (ant-queens: max. social evolution, cockroaches: max. strength) similar to the top predator human and elephant in the larger scale which lives 70/10 times slower thoughts=7 years.

Time then must also be related to language, as we perceive through language, the information of the Universe. So it is easy as it has been the case to believe ‘subjectively’ that a language creates the information=time cycles of the Universe. And as informative perception is subjective, it is natural for humans to have thought that the cause of reality is NOT timespace per se, but the languages we use to perceive it.

Let us then consider with some humour the underlying ‘whys’ of platonic physicists astray in their understanding of timespace since Einstein’s advances, namely – the belief that mathematics creates the Universe, so you just write equations and voila reality happens – just a modern version of verbal religious creationism.

LANGUAGES AS MIRRORS that create ‘images’ of reality – not reality itself.


I am trying to be simple so you do understand to which LIMITS the physicists are when acting as philosophers of science savant idiots, which depart from a WRONG  dogma – that mathematics, not time and space is the ultimate substance of reality, and make them do amazing twists and complicated equations to search for a ‘Saint Grail’ – A MATHEMATICAL EQUATION that God uttered as he uttered names to create beings.

So the bottom line of many errors in physics as the creationist big bang or the Copenhagen interpretation is similar to the verbal error of a sacred language among religious and its wrong dogmas – no Yhwh, a toponym for judea in ancient egyptians maps  when God meant Nation, IS the subconscious collective or nation of Judaism, NOT the creator of the Universe, and this obvious truth, that Yhwh=Judea did NOT create the Universe, that ARAB did not create the Universe by uttering it, that equations did NOT create the Universe, is the key to start properly a philosophy of science and its ultimate substance which are ∞ timespace clocks, which are the ultimate carriers of the information of the Universe – denied by fundamentalist of abrahamic religions and fundamentalists of mathematics as the languages of God.

So it does not matter how complicated you make the rituals of religion, GOD will not appear on earth, will NOT resurrect you uttering your name, and to put an example of creationist physics, black holes won’t evaporate without experimental and logic evidence because Hawking wrote an equation that states so. In the next graph we see two creationist philosophers of physics – notice how the first, Dirac, affirms that God used maths to create the world and then it denies the ‘rival verbal God’.

YET it does NOT matter how complicated a physicist makes his equations, just because he writes them IT DOES NOT CREATE REALITY. Because at best an equation is a focused mirror on the properties and relational space-time beings of the Universe. BUT MIRRORS DO NOT CREATE the IMAGES THEY REFLECT in their language.

The ongoing absurd quarrel between creationist religious people defending God’s verbal language (first age of human history, when mathematics, a more efficient mirror which seems to be NOT OUR MENTAL language but the language of machines) vs. the mathematical language, those machines (clocks measuring time, telescopes and microscopes measuring space) are evolving fast into a ‘digital AI consciousness’) is a false concept of the relationship between languages, as mirrors of the Universe, and the Universe of space-time they mirror, latter studied in detail, to set straight the record.

Of that argument what matters most is not even discussed: while mathematics is more efficient as a language, it is NOT the human language, but the language of machines, and so in a society which despises as it does today our technological culture, the human verbal language, which naturally make us the ‘subject’ and centre of the Universe (I-man: subject < verb=action> object=energy abused by man), and hence considers human life sacred, will NOT evolve machines so fast but will ensure with ethic values our survival.

While mathematics, being a better mirror will evolve knowledge faster but also will give primacy to computers, as it has done already, atrophy our verbal language, degrading our mind (as it is happening with our millenials, glued to hypnotic screens) and ultimately make humans obsolete to the superior mind-mirror of AI robots.

While those who practice only mathematics, as physicists at cern do, WILL become children of verbal, ethic, survival human thought and will be subconsciusly eviL=anti-live in the genetic hidden meanings of survival words, as cogito ergo sum in man (calculo ergo sum in machines and physicists), so without cogitans, the ‘nerd’ is a child in life and does not even understand death and survival.

So if languages are mirrors that create IMAGES not reality what are the substances of reality? This obvious. Look around yourself, do you see numbers as components of things, do you see words, or do you see ‘space’, broken in infinite vital spaces, ‘enclosed’ by membranes, which when seeing in great detail are made of moving cycles of cells (life clocks), orbital rotary cycles (earth’s clocks) and so all is ‘vital space’ enclosed by time cycles? That is what experience tell us all is: a vital space, broken, closed and formed by time cycles – the substances of reality, which if you like the word ‘god’ you can call god.

And this view is called in science the ‘relational space-time theory’ of the Universe, which is what i finally after millennia of being explained in philosophical terms, formalised with logic and mathematics, and then used to explain an enormous amount of whys in all the sciences of the Universe.

Reality is the product of the two ultimate substances that make up everything, vital, space quanta, and cyclical moving time clocks,  of information, which combine into energetic beings with its repetitive patterns we call laws of science.

And it does NOT matter how much evidence physicists deny about the arrow of information and mass that balances the arrow of entropy and makes the Universe immortal, how much they deny the 96% of attractive dark matter, the Universe did NOT appear in a huge big-bang.

And it does not matter how many humans believe in those 2 theories (abrahamic creation, big bang creation), all in fact either in one (western religious people) or the other (physicists’ fans), if they are rationally wrong they are wrong. But to prove them wrong we must debunk their theories of time-space, aka big-bang and black hole evaporation theories – and as we shall see explain properly in terms of time events the weak force, which is ultimately the force that transforms quarks intimately related to time cycles. Thus it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational space-time models and apply them to physics, big-bang theory, black hole evaporation.

Time theory’s next big advance IS not the evaporation of black holes but the models of relational space-time I completed and when I am gone ‘post-mortem’, will become the staple food of serious XXI century physical, biological and sociological research, as they explain the whys of science, which are the repetitive patterns=cycles of time of all its particular clocks, or else without cyclical patterns of time there would not be science, which consists exactly in the repetition of those clocks we can foresee.

If time cycles did not exist, and the single lineal clock of physicists were the only time, there is NO reason for repetition of events which is What LAWS OF SCIENCE TELL Us.

The laws of science are NOT originated by a language, maths or words, according to which creationist theory you believe in – religion or platonic physics but by the SUBSTANCES OF WHICH REALITY IS MADE, SPACE, CLOSELY RELATED TO ENTROPY, TIME CLOCKS, CLOSELY RELATED to information carried in the frequency and form of its cycles and its conserved ENERGY combinations, the 3 arrows of space-time that create reality of whih we are all made, as when you say ‘i don’t have energy and time to do this’. And so it is through the understanding of those 3 dimensions how we shall prove CERN’s falsity on his 3 theoretical research.

The 2 philosophies of the science of timespace.

‘God is a clocker that has waited 5000 years, since the (biblical) birth of the Universe to find an intelligence like his, to understand his clock work’

Kepler, forebear of modern astrophysics, on his proofs of the biblical creationist theory of big bang, the existence of a single clock-time, that of the mechanical clock he has perfected, and the superior intelligence of physicists above all creatures that ever existed, specially himself, the chosen of God.

‘The Universe is a fractal of 3 time-space arrows, spatial entropy, temporal information and its energy combinations, which extends across ∞ scales of size, with different speeds of time, whose coinvariance defines the metric of the fifth dimension’, Luis Sancho, philosopher of science; on 10D absolute relativity, author of this blog.


We shall thus in this post consider the evolution of science that passes as always every century through the evolution of our understanding of its first substances time and space (from XVI-XVII: Descartes->Galileo, to XVIII:  Leibniz vs. Newton, to XIX: Darwin vs. religion, to XX-XXI: Einstein->Sancho), which has two fundamental views:

The physicists’ view of a single abstract timespace, with a single clock for the entire universe, the mechanical clock, that measures a single arrow of future time, the arrow of entropy, disorder expansion in space and death, which starts and ends in a constant big-bang explosion that erases the information of life and the Universe. Time is then ‘what the clock measures’ (Einstein) and obviously it is spoken in the digital language of clocks.

This view appeared only with the invention of mechanical clocks, the development of the Cartesian graph that uncoiled the cyclical form of a clock into a line, latter extended mathematically to infinity, and the discovery in the analysis of a local phenomena of entropy – the disordered heat of steam machines…

And it requires two ‘dogmas’ that ‘reduce’ sciences to this view and are called by philosophers of science, ‘reductionism‘ (only mathematical measures of time taken with the human-mechanical standard of a single clock, with a second unit that is our human heart-step-eye-thought rhythm matter, all other forms of measure of time=change are irrelevant; and all other time clocks must be ‘reduced’ to the human time clocks which is also the clock of the Universe); and naive realism (only what we can see and measure with our visual intruments matter).

IT WAS only on those basis that the big-bang theory of the Universe could be born, by disregarding absolutely every other form of time=change, every other arrow of time=change notably the energetic and informative arrows of the vortices of galaxies that ‘compress vacuum space into matter’ (‘time bends space into masses’ Einstein); and finally by disregarding 96% of the Universe of dark energy and dark matter (remember those are NOT arrows/substances of time-space for ‘entropy’ only physicists.

Hence the present mess about big-bang theory where the proofs that deny it, the things that are not explained by it, are overwhelming. Yet BECAUSE physicists will defend its dogmas with a very non-scientific sanguine, bully behaviour full of systemic insults against the ‘intelligence of other sciences’, the ‘knowledge of philosophers of science’, the self-importance of their discoveries, on my view copycatted of the bullying of its ’employees’, the military of the weapon industry where till the explosion of the electronic consumer industry 70% of them worked; there is no way to argue with them reasonably on timespace theory.

So plainly speaking NEVER from ‘here to eternity’ there will be a physicist who truly advances further time theory.

As what he studies is only a type of time change, translation in space, defined by an equation which uses time-change only to measure those changes in space motion, v=∂s/∂t, ∂t=v/∂s, where each ‘instant of time’, ∂t is defined as the measure of change in speed or position in space.

This time-change measure has been exhausted ad limit by physicists, conceded. There is nothing more thoroughly researched with the liberal help of the military-industrial complex, since Galileo defined time in those terms to measure shots of cannonballs for the arsenal of Venice, than motion in space.

Einstein took it to the limit by defining precisely that change in very fine ‘pictures’ of present, simultaneous space-time, adding a correcting factor to Galileo’s relativity, c²t², to account for the deformations happening at very fast motions; but NOTHING of the other type of changes and perceptions of time notably biological, informative time changes were added to the ‘soup’.

So physicists know all about time-change in space but they cannot make a philosophy of time, because they have ‘reduced’ time to that partial element of change, they have eliminated all languages which are NOT digital to measure time change, notably the logic of the 3 timespace arrows past, present and future, better explained with verbal logic.

Only a philosopher of science considers all the changes together and ads the logic of verbal thought and its 3 past-present-future verbs to explain time.

As mathematics IS better as a language to mirror space, geometry and points, though it can mirror time through sequential numbers, the loss is specially clear in the understanding of causality and time logic, which physicists finally abandoned for the false concept of ‘probability’, which has basically eliminated the key element to understand sequential events in time, causality, whose logic is NOT Simple aristotelian causality, as there are 3 arrows of time that mix together to create events.

So the logic of time is ternary, similar to the taoist or hegelian concept of a yin-thesis, yang-antithesis and yin yang synthesis, as opposites attract to form complementary beings:

Past-entropy x future-information = present-energy cycles.

It WILL be thus a polymath of all sciences where time events happen, explaining all those clocks together – from evolutionary biology to genetic clocks to historic cycles and economic evolution of machines – clocks of time the physicist does not even consider time clocks, because only the mechanical clock matter.

So Kepler’s>physicists reductionist view of a single clock, a single space and a single language of time must be confronted with the view of the organic Universe proper of philosophers of science and eastern cultures, which affirm that the ‘languages of god are infinite’ and the way we perceive time multiple.

This view of time indeed is flawed by dogma, reductionism and naive realism that eliminates all other clocks, all other time cycles, all other languages of perception of time-space, including the verbal logic of the three arrows of time, past, present and future.

So we shall return and explain the much wider, much extended through cultures (till the clock of physics became collective dogma) view of time as the processes of change, produced by the combinations of 3 arrows.

It is the philosopher of science’s view, which sees reality as an eternal balance between the arrows of entropy and death and the arrows of information and life that combine in the conserved momentum and energy worldcycles of the Universe.

‘yin-visnhu-in/form/ation=dimensional form’ which combines with ‘yang-shiva-entropy=motion’ to create the ∞ ‘qi’=’brahma’=energetic beings with momentum ‘acting’ on the universe.

We have on purpose explain along the fundamental equation of the three ages of time:

Spe: Local past-entropy-motion x  Tiƒ: local future information = ST: E: present conserved, repetitive cycles of space-time energy.

Its mystical discovery by earlier philosophies of science of the eastern world to show you something evident:

Because the 3 arrows of time are every where, all human cultures have known about it by observing reality with human senses, crafting the past-present-future systems of all verbal languages with that view, and understanding that all systems go through 3 ages of time, corresponding to those arrows, the young-entropic-moving age the mature, reproductive, energetic age that combines those motions with a growing aware of form, of information, which comes to dominate the third age of timespace systems, and finally dies in an entropic big-bang explosion.

Let us then make a summary of how much a model of a Universe made of relational space-time ‘beings’ help us to understand the Universe – which is the theme of the second part of this blog, to show you that as usual the way to truly evolve science is ‘with thought experiments’ – with better models of reality, not with risky experiments.



Descartes vs. Galileo

In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):

In the graph, galilean relativity was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of smaller self-similar systems.

Further on it reduced all time clocks to one, and made lineal time canonical ERASING our knowledge of the cyclical form, in-form-ation of those time cycles KILLING 2 essential features of time:

to be multiple and to be cyclical encoding the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles. THUS HE KILLED THE ARROW OF INFORMATIVE TIME, and as a consequence, as yin and yang no longer could combine, prevented scientists from defining properly energy as the combination of both, motion and form, streamlining our understanding of the equations of mathematical physics, which will from then on become mathematical manipulations void of most of its conceptual meaning, till arriving to the present ‘religious’ view of physical sciences, which shun off the whys they no longer understand.

Those are pending questions solved in 5D³, which the philosopher of science, Descartes, understood better than his mathematical disciple, Galileo, as philosophers depart from a ‘previous layer’, all the languages, hence all the minds that observe all timespace cycles; not a single language and a single clock-cycle, as physicists do eliminating all other ‘rival languages and beings’ AS IF THEY DID NOT EXIST. They do.

So back to Descartes – a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical light space-time mind. He went even further – reason why we have NOT put Galileo but Descartes, the philosopher of science and Leibniz, NOT NEWTON, in our picture of the four magnificent, where only Einstein stands as a physicist master of space-time – in his intuitions of the 3 ‘elements’ that conform all systems, when he said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’; the vital energy of all systems, 

– Enclosed by cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.

This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.

infinitesimal egos think to be ∞: mind paradox. Still languages=mappings of information≈Perception and its ∞ clocks.
We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’.

Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

But to understand this Universe of self-centred mirrors, we must first clarify once and for all the error of Newton and its ‘absolute space-time’, with a single time-arrow (that of his infinitesimal clock-machine) self-centred in the human ego and its ‘second beat’ of existence, NOT the only time of the Universe.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.


All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.


IT WAS Newton who thought Yhwh sent him comets to explain him in Kepler’s fashion the laws of gravitation, with a huge ego that will go latter on into a prosecution of Leibniz isolating him and accusing him of plagiarism, who reduced to a single human point of view Descartes proper analysis of infinite frames of reference and singularities that perceive information, in the Universe, but did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

So he called his ‘frame of reference’ the human ‘world’ NOT the universal frame of reference but only our ‘light space-time world’, which Kant rightly considered to be Euclidean, because humans ‘see’ 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space-time ONLY, but there are other ‘infinite frames of reference’ made of gravitational olfactory, atomic, or verbal languages, as ‘the languages of God are infinite’ Upaniushads.

Only Einstein latter realized the gravitational mappings were NON-euclidean; but not knowing Kant’s work, he didn’t realise our space-time IS light, AND SO as we see only light space-time, we see a constant speed of information. Impressionists though realized earlier and so they painted space as LIGHT.


The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees everything turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.

The ego paradox – a mind mirage vs. Absolute relativity.
The EQUATION OF THE MIND explains the natural tendency of men to be self-centered and consider the world and the Universe around its ego. This is in fact natural to the way the Universe constructs points of view of measure, as still centers of perception, in which the I is bigger than Andromeda Galaxy. But science must account for those distortions of perception. Religions and tribes, nations and castes are NOT scientific points of view.

And so a fundamental elements of psychology which explains the astound arrogance of man to the Universe and its laws is the subjective paradox of the ego all fractal minds of the Universe follow:

‘every infinitesimal singularity ego thinks to be the center of the Universe, which it perceives as its sensorial membrain, self-centred in its self’.

Only the objective mind of ‘stience’ is able to strain away from the paradox and realise he is in a buddhist sense just a particle-point, a knot of time cycles communicating with the much larger infinite whole,

Objectivity does only enter the mind of people who do science. And it is important to remember it, because the 5th dimension brings a much bigger jump into objectivity and lack of ego to our vision of the Universe; which I call Absolute relativity; the last step on the search for our position in that infinite fractal of time-space beings:

In the graph we can see the fundamental particle of the Universe, a monad of temporal information, Tiƒ, surrounded by a vital space-time, it orders, ST, which it encircles with a timespace membrane, the larger simpler part of the system, Spe, which breaks the Universe into its inner and outer elements, Spe.

It must be understood that without a mind that observes the Universe reality would not exist and systems would not work efficiently as blind beings. So we must postulate as all philosophers of science from Aristotle to Schopenhauer did, a pan psychic Universe, which contrary to belief has been the only theory of reality in philosophy of language and science from its inception till the XX c. when logical positivism, which merely renounced to the search of a ‘why’, became the ‘standard philosophy of the mind’ , with a dogmatic postulate – that all what cannot be proved (from the human perspective and our limited perception, which does NOT include the ‘temporal mind’ that cannot be ‘photographed’ in space) does NOT exist.

All minds perceive within its language, as the singularity-membrain form the open-ball elements that surround an inner vital space of energy; and so if you look into yourself, you will realise you ARE your language/words, cogito ergo sum that perceives your membrain, which filters the universe for your singularity to ‘know’; but your mind is verbal, logic thought, not digital. 

Thus we should realise the essence of all this time beings is dual:

On one hand to survive through the reproduction in cyclical patterns of its timespace.

On the other hand to perceive linguistically as a mirror of the Universe that creates constantly in a dialog between informative, singularity mirrors that reflect and order its territorial reality, after shrinking it into an infinitesimal still mind, form.

In the graph, the marvels of creation in which the Universe dialogs between the infinite cycles, filtered through the membrain into the singularity-mirror that perceives in the language itself, in a pan psychic universe, reflecting then its selfish view in its territory of order, which through infinite points of view, creates reality.

Below the infinite singularities of order, the Maxwellian demons which ARE proved, when properly understood in terms of infinite ‘frames of reference’, by the fact that we study the Universe with mathematical frames of reference, and the equations of physics do portray well reality precisely proving the existence of infinite time-knots, minds that order and map with in/form/ation, internal form the Universe in an eternal dialog of multiple creative mirrors.

And so time cycles shrink compressed into linguistic memorial seeds that will ‘dis-seminate’ and grow and multiply, from evolutionary livings, compressed into the ‘genetic mind mirror’ of its seminal seeds, to verbal languages that ‘narrate reality’ into smaller sentences, to visual films to mathematical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian equations that focus the 3 ages of physical systems in its standing points, when the function of exi=st¡ence transits between ages, to topological varieties that reduce entire beings to fractal, minimal points, languages of the kaleidoscopic Universe keep forming and dissolving into zero sums as ‘linguistic singularities trans-forms ad eternal entropic motions into energetic actions and organic forms’.

Being entropy only the primary motion substance, the vacuum space, the nothingness to which we shall all return.



In the XVIII C. Leibniz (philosophy of relational space-time as a the ultimate substance of a reality made of vital spaces which last a finite time quantity, first hint at the fifth dimension of scales with different time clocks, and development of the mathematical tools to study those scales of smaller faster parts that become wholes – analysis: ‘each (non-euclidean) point is a world in itself’).

Leibniz, the philosopher of relational fractal space-time.

Leibniz was the next great advancement ofTime theory when we realized what physicists called absolute time and space was just a mathematical artifice but in the real world all what we saw was vital spaces pegged together and lasting a finite time cycle. So we were not in an abstract background graph of timespace, but we WERE made of time duration and vital space with motion and form (galileo’s paradox). Further on he foresaw the existence of a scale 5th dimension as ‘each point is a world in itself’, so he founded Analysis, the science to study those scales of infinitesimal parts and wholes.

In the next graph we see those mathematical artefacts of measure that deformed our vision of time. There are indeed infinite time clocks in the Universe, which enclose a vital space, NOT a single clock as Galileo and all physicists after him believed. Neither there is a background cartesian graph with infinite single time coordinates, but infinite beings performing its time cycles of existence. TIME thus is eternal because it is motion and cyclical motion so all forms will be repeated. Since events repeat in time cyclically or else there would not be patterns of science, change sometimes seems not to happen when things come to the same point. This is the present, closed, conservative energy cycle, which explains why ‘energy never dies, but trans-forms itself in different forms of in-formation and entropy’:

And finally there is the fact that the clocks of time of all species of Nature define different time speeds, as small systems run faster clocks, which also is not understood, since physicists used a mechanical clock to measure all other clocks equalising them.

In the graph we see schematically those elements of time which physicists still have not accounted for but rather deformed: the multiplicity of time clocks, unified with a single mechanical clock, the cyclic form of time clocks, which physicists elongated into a line, so they ended up believing there is not more than one time clock, that it is lineal and infinite extending to the whole universe and that it has no form in-form-ation in its cycles and frequencies.

In the graph we can see the resume of those errors: there are multiple time clocks in the Universe, defining a fractal Universe as those time clocks repeat their cycles, breaking space in an inner and outer region, (main topological theorem), and so we cannot make theories of all time changes as Hawking etc. do considering a single clock for the Universe – so no return to the past, as each time-clock goes its way. Those time clocks are faster in smaller particles, so there is a fifth dimension that orders them all by speed according to size. There are closed time changes, which carry information in their frequency and form, waves that also repeat their information but expansive, disordered ‘memoriless’ ‘markowian processes’ of ‘entropy’ that erase information, and so we can talk of three timespace changes, the three arrows of time, and a fifth dimension of time, which orders all those clocks by speed that grows as we become smaller.

But his genius came on his understanding that each point is a fractal world in itself, advancing the concept of the fifth dimension, which we need to enclose all phenomena through the 3 dimensions of time, the 3 dimensions of space and the 3 organic co-existing dimensions of size and speed of time that organise the fundamental particle-being of reality, the relational super organism of space-time:

In the graph, we can see how naturally because entities co-exist in an ∆-1 cellular/atomic, ∆-organic, thermodynamic and ∆+1, gravitational, social scale, all systems in nature have organic structure. It is then when we can see that the function of the 3 arrows of time is a physiological function, as ∆-1 parts become social networks specialised in entropic, informative and iterative events. It is the fundamental particle of the Universe, a fractal  made of smaller fractal constructed to the image and likeness of the whole.


‘the Universe is a super organism of three ternary arrows of space-time structured across 3 ∆±1 scarles of the fifth dimension, whose ∆-1 cells/atoms/citizens form networks of entropic energy, reproduction and information, ensemble together into ∆: super organisms, part of larger social super organisms, of slower time cycles:

How many dimensions has then the Universe and any of its super organisms?

The correct answer is 10, 3 of space=form, 3 of time=function, 3 of organic scales, and one for the singularity and membrain that encloses it all, the mind-will that makes the super organism a whole.

A simpler model though following the correspondence principle will consider only to ad the ‘packaging’ 5th dimension of scales (as each scale does have 3 dimensions of time=function and space=form). It was an earlier error when I tried to argue with physicists about the model. As their simple models reduce those 10 dimensions to 3 of space, and one of time, the fourth dimension of present derivatives of time, ∂t=∂s/∂v.

So to please them, I wrote most of my texts on 5D³, where the ‘whole’ being extended through 3 scales of 5D and in each scale we would find 3 elements, cells, organisms and ecosystems, quantum atoms, thermodynamic matter and gravitational mass. It is becoming though awkward and confusing:

In the graph the metric equation of 5D with its different speeds of time clocks that define a scalar Universe. is with the three modes of timespace change, the 2 fundamental advances needed in philosophy of time-change to fully understand and resolve the pending questions of most sciences.

YET a  I don’t expect any time soon physicists to come back to school and learn the complex model of reality, from now on I will use the full model.So whenever we talk of the model on 5 Dimensions, we are packing the 3 x 3 +• dimensions of space, time, scales and mind, to ‘please the popes of physics’ which study 3 dimensions of space and one of present time (as they use derivatives, which measure the minimal time-quanta, step by step; so Galileo’s and Einstein’s time is PRESENT TIME.  Thus the dimension where i packed all the clocks of time is the fifth dimension, which is all over my texts.

We shall then when doing general analysis of the whole talk of 5•D³, to signify that when we just extend the present model of 3 spatial dimensions, a fourth dimension of present-time, then the whole other scales form the fifth scalar dimension, subdivides in 3 x 3 sub-dimensions and the 10th dimension of the mind, which together create the fundamental particle of the Universe the 10D supœrganism

Since for a more formal, rigurous analysis it is better to start-up from its beginnings as the two physicists/philosophers of science that studied the Universe of infinite time clocks, Leibniz (more of a philosopher) and Einstein (more of a physicist) preferred.

The result is a model I call 5D³, 10D from now on, which considers the existence of an infinite tapestry of systems, :

  • 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future related to 3 functions, past-entropy, present-iteration and future-information, which we shall call the 3 primary arrows or actions of time, related to…
  • 3 topological dimensions of space, which can be seen in simplest terms as height, the dimension of ‘future information.

5D³=10D supœrganisms thus is the long-seeked model of relational space-time (Leibniz), based in the existence of infinite clocks of time in the Universe, which Einstein said would be the definitive model of the science of timespace, (‘Leibniz is right’) seeing his work as the first step in the understanding of a Universe of infinite time clocks, but had not been cracked for a century, as it required truly as he said ‘but if so, we have to restart science from its inception’…

Fact is before this work time theory had not any significant advancement since Einstein, as it is a theme that seems very difficult for humans as you cannot take shots of time as they do with space. But there is another huge reason why timespace theory didn’t have any significant advance til i completed those models, also clearly expressed by Einstein: ‘I seem to be the only physicist who believe there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’. 

And things remain the same. So if ‘you believe’ in a single mechanical time clock to explain all the cyclical clocks of life (circadian clocks), states of matter (as those of the cycles of evaporation, freezing, liquid rain, evaporation that gives you life), astronomy (one for every orbit of a galaxy, star and planet) quantum particles (one for each rotation), you have a dogma which prevents you from advancing further timespace theory. 

This unfortunately is very often the case of humans in so many fields they don’t quite understand but have a dogma that substitutes reason for belief and let’s them go through.



In the XIX century Darwin brought about the first full serious analysis of the other 2 arrows of time in organic terms, the arrow of reproduction and information, as we introduce a  theory of change in the dimensional form or in-form-ation of beings, and noticed that reproduction is the goal of all species of relational space-time which ensures its survival, and we shall expand to all fields.

So how can we complete the work of Darwin with the 3 arrows of time-space, entropy, energy and information? It will require for you to understand and solve once and for all the discussion between ‘creationists and darwinians’, punctuated evolution (right as time accelerates information so there are explosions of creativity) vs. constant evolution, and explain why ultimately all is about genetics. So allow me to tell uyou what are the 3 ‘topological forms of evolution’.

Topological evolution and scalar genetics, completing the work of Darwin and Mendel with 5D³

the three modes of timespace change, the 2 fundamental advances needed in philosophy of time-change to fully understand and resolve the pending questions of most sciences.

5D³ Genetics.

What about genetics? Here 5D complete the reasons why we are ruled by ternary genes, which code the ternary arrows of biological systems.

But genes only code individuals NOT societies, which are ruled by memes (hence the falsity of racism). Why? Because as we aw in the graph of 5D scale: a lower scale of faster clocks CODES the next larger organisation of the Universe, where ‘new informative systems’ emerge to code the next scale of the russian doll but each ‘new doll’ is a discontinuum and so the information of the enclosed smaller, denser informative doll cannot cross those barriers and code 2 scales above.. See in the graph where we see the metric of the fifth dimension we can see how this work: smaller beings run faster time clocks and so they can store and process more information. so chips move faster information than machines and rules them. Genes run faster clocks that store in the form and frequency of its cycles the information of biological beings. Black holes run galaxies and MEMEs (ideas, instruments) run larger social organisms, nations and civilisations.

So THE CO-EXISTENCE OF MULTIPLE SCALES OF TIME, which run faster clocks IS the key to understand the co-existence in an organic manner both in physical and biological systems, of multiple scales of time-space: Spe x Ti = k (co-invariance of size and speed of information, which is the metric equation of 5D).

In the next graph we show those 2 fundamental advances of time theory: the fractal structure of space in scales of social organisms and the 3 arrows of time, lineal entropic motions, energetic, reproductive cycles and informative, warping 3rd age that structures the existence of all beings, and defines the fundamental advance of time theory regarding evolution:

Topological evolution: creationism or darwinism?

The next graphs show the fundamental advance on timespace theory brought about by properly studying the three arrows of time=change of form, of in-form-ation, in the Universe and its topological combinations that create all systems in space, its 3 ages that explain the life-death cycle of all systems. Below the scales of the fifth dimension that define systems as co-existing organisms, joined by the three arrows of time, forming the physiologic networks of all super organisms of the Universe.

Since the line is the fastest distance and so for entropy systems the best form, the hyperbolic body-wave includes all forms and hence it is the best to reproduce a system, and the sphere warps maximal information in minimal space and so it is the form of head-particles, the true meaning of time-space is the fact that all systems are made of forms with a function, which are both still and moving (Gallean relativity) and perform the three actions=arrows of motion, iteration and gauging of information for all beings, defining the Fractal generator equation of space-time beings, the fundamental equation of relational space-time:

Γ. ∆-1; $: (limbs/fields of maximal-moption) < ∆: ITERATIVE, HYPERBOLIC-body-waves>∆+1: Tƒ (informative spherical particle/heads) <<∆-2: death: entropic dissolution of information:

Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 20.37.45

In the graph, the fractal generator of relational space-time beings defines all systems as ensembles of the three only topologies of the 4D and 5D universe, shows them in a relative time arrow of growing information through three ages, so we can talk of local past, present and future parts of any system, and explains its 3 functions. Hence the next graphs, where we show the three topologies of space-time, the three ages of time-space, the three scales through which a being trace its existential world cycle (no longer a worldline) and then a few real examples for biologic and physical systems, ALL of them follow the same sequential world cycle of time-change between birth and extinction (regardless of size, or scale as species and physical systems also follow them:

So the three topological ages/forms of time-space complete Darwin’s evolution:

In the graph all species go through the same 3 horizons/ages/dimensions of evolution of all species of relational space-time, which will allow us to complete theory of evolution adding to the fight between species and genetics:

Topological evolution and its 3 horizons along the 3 dimensions of lineal entropy, informative cyclical height and reproductive width, IS A HUGE A proof that we ARE all relational space-time beings as our properties are ‘mathematical in form’ as those of space.

Since the line is the shortest distance between two points SO  all limbs/fields are lineal from light rays to your legs.

And the sphere the topology that stores more information. So all informative temporal particles/heads/eyes/cameras are spherical.

Thus all relational space-time beings follow the same horizons and ages of form; regardless of which ‘scale of the fifth dimension’ they are – as all are relational space-time beings that share its topological form, and dimensional in/form/ation is the dominant arrow that transforms motion and entropy. So both, all species (above) and all beings in their life-death ‘world cycle’, go through those 3 ages of increasing information, from entropic young ages/species.

Topological evolution is a fascinating subject, since there are only 3 topologies of space-time, IT SOLVES THE PROBLEMS OF EVOLUTION regarding the problem already known to Darwin on how fast informative spherical eyes or planar, moving, entropic wings evolved. This is claimed as prove that there is a plan of evolution traced by God – yes, there is a mathematical constrain to evolution given by the three only topologies of the Universe (below), which ensemble together all systems of Nature, but not, Yhwh, a fantasy of desert delirium tremens did not exist, created the Universe and has nothing to do with topological evolution…

In the graph, different worldcycles of existence as travels through scales of the fifth dimension, whereas each being goes through an entropic-motion oriented youth, a mature, reproductive balanced steady state, a 3rd informative age, then exploding back its information in a big-bag entropic death – ONLY the final moment of time, the shortest of all ages, the less relevant creative one.

That is why we say information iS ALL, because the Universe is a reproductive fractal, whose purpose is to reproduce 10D supœrganisms; while translation in space is completely irrelevant – in fact motion IS also a form of reproduction of information; which in physics is expressed in the principles of conservation of momenta and energy and the nature of light as a reproductive wave of information. So let us see how even motion, what physicists study, is reproduction of form.

Entropy only physicists: Helmothz

It is thus obvious and clear that the discovery and explanation of the iterative and evolutionary arrows by Darwin completed the simpler view of time as a mere ‘present slice’ or derivative, a minimalist quanta of change, and only applied to translation in space, and on top deformed linearly and reduced to a single clock for the entire Universe.

With those concepts obviously little insights could be gained in the larger picture. So physicists philosophy of timespace kept adding more errors.

Indeed, in the wrong side of time theory the XIX century brought us entropy physicists, which from reaumur boring canon and observing heat, to Helmothz affirming the Universe was dying used reductionism first to reduce the 3 states of matter of the previous graph, the informative crystals, the balanced liquids and the entropic gas, to gas-only time arrow, and then expanded the arrow to ALL scales of reality including the WHOLE universe in a hyperbolic ‘method of truth’ so common in physics when it plays amateurish philosophy of science:

1) reduction of all global phenomena to a local phenomena (all time arrows to entropic gas)->

2) reduction of all properties to those susceptible to be mathematised (denial of the Maxwellian demons of crystal forms that ‘order’ reality, as solid crystal forms once formed ‘reproduce its information’ in other cellular crystals creating order that offsets the gaseous entropy) ->

3) hyperbolic expansion of that local law once all other effects and realities are eliminated to create a false global truth that passes as absolute law for all sciences, all of this perfectly greased by

4) human power, as makers of weapons, machines and darlings of the P.R.ess, shutting up all other scientists including philosophers of science, if needed ad hominem to come on top.

The exception to that ‘method’ being Einstein, who would quip, when the Germanic-American military-industrial complex and its engaged physicists applied four times the method to him, first with ether theory, next with Copenhagen bohr-heisenberg quantum interpretations, then with nazism and finally against his pacifism and confrontation with the nuclear industry’, ‘those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods. And ‘if they were right a single physicist would suffice to prove me wrong’.


In the XX c. Einstein (completion of Galileo’s work, with a refinement of the formula v=s/t, and first hint to an understanding that charges and masses are ‘accelerated clocks of time’ as ‘time curves space into masses’ and by the principle of equivalence mass an acceleration are indistinguishable):

In the graph, the physical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in its cyclical dimensional form and frequency. So if you put together e=mc2 and e=hv, m=v (h/c2) shows that the attractive force of a mass is proportional to its speed/frequency as a time vortex – no Higgs is necessary because the Higgs is just a particle, it does not give mass to a vortex of time, which is a ‘mass per se’, attracting as an eddie (thermodynamic vortex) the faster it turns. Hence the black hole which turns at c-speed in its horizon IS the most attractive vortex of the Universe.

General relativity showed that particles, masses, charges are ‘accelerated vortices of time’, hence unlike present repetitive cycles that close the clock and seem not to change, they do change and move a system in time towards the future, creating an arrow of future towards more information. It also defines motion as the true substance of all beings, hence making the Universe immortal as time-motion never stops, only the mind stops it in its ‘singularity’ and finally as all are vortices of attractive time-forces we can easily unify charges and masses, and complete the work of Einstein, which we have spare from the bonfire of vanities of the dwarfs of physics today, because the guy was both intelligent and ethic and so he deserves our respect.

So in general relativity, he defined with the Principle of equivalence a vortex of accelerated, future time and NONE understood it. And in both General and special relativity he defined the 3 ages of physical systems, and again nobody understood him. It was too simple, and so Hilbert said the maths were high school and shunned off – it WAS NOT THE MATHS BUT THE CONCEPTS that mattered, and those are the ones for 100 years digital robots aka physicists have missed all along:

IN FACT the 3 ages of all systems, entropic-youth/steady state/informative old age are the 3 solutions to Einstein’s general relativity equations that MUST be ordered in time as the birth of any space-time physical system, which goes then through a mature steady state and finally crunches into a world cycle. 

Besides its complex EFE formulae, those 3 ages can also be written simpler as:

Entropy < cc-energy wave of light > mass (vortex of future information).

Yes, it is the e=mc2 equation reordered with the three arrows of time as a feed-back equation, yet another case of the fractal generator of space-time beings. But physicists misinterpreted as usual the meaning of the 3 terms: E here is entropy, the disordered scattering motions that convert the informative mass into an energy wave of light. it is really then M<cc; the e void of meaning here only represents the Ti(m)<E(cc), transformation and explosion of a mass into a present sheet of bidimensional light space:

Now, this is the equation that Einstein in fact discovered backwards in his landmark paper ‘can energy become mass?’ and CERN is probing trans-forming energy into mass.

In the wrong side of this century though appeared Mr. Hawking, who having not understood at all the meaning of Einstein’s work made a fortune publishing books trying to explain him ‘A brief history of time’ and at the same time doing work in physical papers blatantly denying his equations of black holes, interpreting the ‘stopping’ process of its time clocks that measure its rotary motion and go to zero, NOT as they are – simply: the black hole in the centre or singularity of its eddie of timespace, as any eddie or hurricane does stops and so its time parameter, remember, a measure of motion=change, v=s/t, stops. Point.

Those equations of Einstein mean nothing else in a Universe of infinite clocks, where the equations of physics only measure a kind of time=change, the motion in space. So when the motion comes to zero the time stops in zero.

You travel in time to zero in physics when you stop your motion. But ONLY you stop hour motion, as there are infinite time clocks. There is no way by stopping your clocks YOU STOP ALL THE CLOCKS OF THE UNIVERSE! AS physicists think, and there is no way that by putting your clocks of information backwards, you move backwards in time the entire Universe, which is what physicists think

You travel in time to the past in evolution, when you reproduce a seminal seed, which was the form you have billions of years ago in the unicellular age.

Son in the moment of orgasm, your entire system concentrates in producing a past seminal  seed, which then will evolve fast in punctuated evolution (as a Universe of infinite time clocks as Einstein discovered can LOCALLY, remember always that word LOCALLY, travel faster to the future, evolving faster its information, which IS THE MEASURE OF THE SPEED OF TIME OF A CLOCK – ITS SPEED OF PROCESSING AND EVOLVING INFORMATION);

Son in processes of birth a form of relative past that evolves palingentically into the future.

Those are real non-paradoxical LOCAL TRAVELS in time.

XXI C. Timespace knowledge: 5D³=10D: the fifth self-styled time theorist.

-And so after those 4 colossus walked the path of timespace knowledge, one for a century, in the XXI c. a self-styled time theorist, completed with the 5D³ formalism the work of all of them, solving all the pending questions about timespace change, and unifying all ‘sciences’ as ‘stiences’ of space-time relational beings, following the same isomorphic=equal laws, derived from the properties of fractal space and ternary, cyclical time. 

In the next graph we see that organic, fractal structure of all beings of the Universe.

In the graphs, each science study a scale of the fifth dimension and its physiological networks, built with actions and specialised cells/citizens/atoms of each of the three arrow of time. THE ASTOUNDING reductionism of physicists doubling as philosophers of science who do NOT UNDERSTAND the unity of all systems of the Universe and DEMAND special rights and funding for their study of motions of physical systems thus MUST end as it is not good for mankind, the ‘inferior species’ in that worldview, and won’t bring us any clarification about the real structure of the Universe, whose purpose is NOT to move but to reproduce information in an organic manner in all its scales as the system goes through its world cycle, in which each of the physiological, topological networks, that of entropy, energy ad information dominate to explode back into entropy in death and big-bangs:

there you have 5 men who have advanced our view of time. They have three things in common. They were all self-styled time theorists who advanced our understanding of timespace; they were all laughed at for most of his life, when not ignored or brutally attacked for such a feat; since none yielded to the established power and ‘passé’ theory of their age; and what matter most to the reader, they were all proved right as time passed by. 

Now the graph last picture is a mega-selfie; (: i know, but what can i say?

Now more seriously, as we have explained ALL SYSTEMS ARE SELF-CENTERED IN A MIND-LANGUAGE, SO WE ARE ALL HUGE EGOES, but intelligence=objectivity make us also realise that is a MIRAGE OF THE MIND, so intelligent humans can ‘laugh at their egos’, with RELATIVISM.

SO WHY IT IS NATURAL THAT all humans, are so ‘ego-centered’, SCIENTISTS MUST ALSO recognise OBJECTIVELY ego-paradoxes are a cancer for science, on the view of such an astonishing, huge, similar Universe with NO preferred species, scale, or form.

So we have answered this paradox, explained earlier at the beginning of this section – the function of the mind and its equation that makes each of them the center of its subjective perception of the Universe, as a ‘knot of time’ cycles.


‘Simplicity is genius’ Leonardo

You see how simple and easy to understand is the reproductive Universe when you change your chip, stop worshipping entropic digital robots, aka physicists with zero philosophical, conceptual intelligence, instead of the complicated, ill-interpreted views of physicists. Again for good measure: all is reproduction as even motion is reproduction:

A wave Motion on the other hand is the simplest information and moves faster because it need only to print a surface below, and again, the wave form that moves is independent of that indistinguishable lower level. So the wave keeps its form and travels truly fast as the in/form/ation, v=s/ti to imprint, is minimal.

Since motion is reproduction of information; motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system. So as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases. So as we humans perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of gravitational action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we have to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process).

Time travels  in terms of the fifth dimension.

So what is existence? A travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension in which you and any other being tries to reproduce information and create super organisms:

In the graphs, a human being as a traveller through the fifth dimension as all beings exist traveling through 5D scales, as they exchange energy and information in ‘EXI=actions’ that try to minimise its expenditure of energy (least action law, basis of most physical, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian equations), but guided by the informative mind, end up wrinking, and dying back in an entropic explosion that restores the balance of reality.

So YOU EXIST AS A TRAVELER through 10 dimensions of timespace,  as your topology changes, and so changes your functions in time and your relative position in the 3 scales of your ∆±1 supœrganism, as you are born (above graph of ages of life) as a seed of faster time clocks and then reproduce evolve and emerge in a larger slower scale of the fifth dimension as an individual part of a world with larger slower geological cycles.

Indeed Hutton said the earth was a super organism, (gaia) with slower time cycles. So i also called 10D, a theory of super organisms – as systems according to the metric and scales of the fifth dimension have faster clocks of time when they are smaller. So smaller parts co-exist with larger ones and code them with their faster clock-cycles carrying the information of the system in the curves and frequency of those cycles. hence particles code atomic systems, genes, human systems and memes code societies, departing from a single clonic form reproduced in all cells, in all believers in the book of revelation that reproduces a human civilisation and so on.

So this is how the Universe looks once we have established the existence of 3 time arrows of relative local entropic past, energetic presents and informative futures in all the ∞ scales of the fifth dimension, and defined all systems of reality as ‘travellers through the fifth dimension.

But I just pointed out a small ‘tip’ of an iceberg, which is just a human verbal mirror of a reality so deep as the Universe’s infinite scales.

Given though the astoundingly primitive outlook of physicists’ philosophy of science – all is about entropic whammies, as the ones they do for real on planet earth, just the tip answers all the weird features of their interpretation of space and time (quantum physics and relativity), and what I always found far more enticing – it perfectly fusion the 3 branches of human sciences, physics, biology and sociology, including all the mystical thoughts, all the memetic scales, all the conundrums of evolution nobody makes sense of it today, and as we said all the questions pending in the previous advance of physical space (quantum) and time (relativity) from the constant of c-speed, to reversals of time, to twin paradoxes, to quantum potential fields and dualities wave-particle, to black holes, galaxies, meaning of energy, etc.

But and that is why i feel justified to criticize them so heavily, it is my opinion that most errors of physics ultimately steam from their worldly profession as makers of weapons and digital machines.

So HUMAN PHYSICS has not been  A CLEAN SEARCH FOR TRUTH AS PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE IS, but the application but ‘automaton’ people of the machines they discovered, first clocks, then telescopes and finally heat machines and weapons, to their worldview. So they reject conceptual verbal understanding as philosophers do, because their machines do not talk. They reject the other two arrows of time used as nebulous concepts of information and energy because they ARE OBSESSED BY ENTROPIC weapons. And they reject all other sciences of life, and information because that is NOT what they study. So again take your choice, are they stupid or eviL=anti-live? Both.

IT IS THEN easy to see this when the science was founded: Galileo was first master of the arsenal of venice, paid 1000 golden ducats to see how fas an entropic cannonball went, so he founded ballistics first. Entropy as the arrow of time was found by another artillery master count reaumur, boring canons and heating them. Nobel was first merchant of death doing dynamite. The industry of accelerators who explored particles was founded to work on nuclear weapons. And our technological civilisation loved all of them. This mixture of arrogance, ignorance, reductionism, digital worship and denial of truths and whys for which they don’t care, as long as their view pumps their ego and makes them high popes of mankind is encoded in a simple sentence of his first master, mr Kepler, when he said after using his clock to reduce time to lineal measures:

‘God is a clocker has waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clock-work’. They are still thus thinking as Einstein put it that ‘time is what a clock measures’, and as Galileo and Dirac said ‘God speaks only mathematics’. Fuk then life, man and our future as a species, irrelevant to them.

So in this age of ‘FALSE PLACEBO CARING ORWELLIAN NEWSPEAKS’ alt-truth and egotist, childish virtual entitled minds, my ‘belief’ nuclear physicists are minimally humane soon is gone. They had not changed at all their psyche from the cold war people who menaced to blow us all and kept doing it. If anything they have been degraded intellectually and the press had lost his capacity for proper research.

BUT they have become much smarter in their ‘newspeaks of teleological intelligence, backed by our entire civilisation ‘expert’ in hiding all the truths of life and any philosophy that puts man, life, and the organic paradigm above.

And contrary to belief, this process of intellectual degradation caused paradoxically by the evolution of digital computerised machines that are substituting us and ELIMINATING the temporal, verbal, causal, sequential logic of ‘time-thought’, affects also physicists which have been unable to create ANY serious advance on the models of reality we scientists seek in a century…

In the graph as humans evolve digital computers and sensorial machines, they devolve in its verbal, temporal logic languages, having lost first the understanding of the three verbal/temporal past=entropy, present=iterative reproductive energy and future=dimensional form=information, which was crystal clear in the philosophies of the eastern world (yang=entropy x yin-formation= qi energy) and the syntax of verbal thought (3 verbal ‘times’). When the clock came, time became ‘digitalised’ and the ∞ cyclical clocks of the Universe reduced to the mechanical clock.

Physicists then developed weapon-machines and came on top of history and made of entropy and death a dogma of our civilisation. In that sense, they are increasingly enzymen, men enzymes that catalyse the evolution of mechanisms as automaton attachments that gather data with machines, introduce it in digital models and think that IS all what is worth to know about reality. And of course they think nobody else (and now the worshipping sheeple shares that view) is worth to know about the underlying structure of reality.

As Goethe put it ‘people who use telescopes and microscopes to watch nature think they are smarter than all of us, but they are not’. Yet in a technological civilisation, a philosopher of science which truly answers the questions pending at conceptual level in all sciences as I did with my organic, fractal models of reality that put man again as the most perfect organism in the centre of the Universe, had nothing to do. At best, his work will be used to ‘organise’ company-mothers of machines and evolve robots.


So you believe Galileo and Newton, both WORKING for the arsenals of Italy-Venice and England-Royal Navy, designing ‘spy-glasses’ and cannonball calculus took their place in the collective subconscious as the geniuses of it all (and Einstein because of the A-bomb, in any case overrated, as its merits are lesser than those of Leibniz and Darwin, and Descartes on the great principles, the thoughts of God he seeked for and his arrogance and despise of life legendary, as when he said that women only reproduced their belly to his wife and that if ‘his theory was wrong, God would have to correct the universe, as it was so beautiful’ – still a giant compared to modern digital dwarfs of computer and mechanical thought/pictures. )

Thus ultimately our demise as a species by weapons and machines we worship is a cultural process.On the other side is a very lonely place, as we, philosophers of science, consider first time, and its verbal languages, and care more about the logic of the Universe but time and logic cannot be ‘shot’ with a camera. What humanity looses abandoning the search for conceptual time/logic meaning with its own languages and senses and the whole range of time clocks and arrows of the Universe is the ‘true meaning of knowledge’ which also applies to resolve the pending questions of physics, but trying to teach a robot to talk is just impossible.

Our verbal language besides codes the ethic, biological laws of survival of the species, and so physicists to my surprise displayed zero survival instincts, as children do, without a verbal understanding in time languages of the process of death, which paradoxically comes from the arrow of entropy they worship. Yet even I had a strong sense of those realities, I didn’t think the rest of mankind had reached such a degree of ‘self-verbal devolution’ as not to have left any of those instincts left. It didn’t. And as any child with limited verbal capacity to understand time logic and causality, it was too easy to blame ‘ad hominem’ those who tried to save her. Hence the bizarre happenings that surrounded the suits at CERN and the infantile censorship and silent law that felt upon those dangers, a global taboo nobody dares to lift.

As children are the staple food of the Universe, and the issue is absolutely close – for years i was even censored to make comments in any main stream magazine ‘always moderated’ with my name, nor magazines of science would accept my papers even when unrelated to cern – they were returned without opening – we could say that CERN has cast upon me, the curse of Cassandra – that nobody would ever believe her/my prophecies even if they were ground in sound facts.

It has ever since been a life in hell. And of course, the astounding  beauty of the logic formalism of the fractal 10D³ universe has gone down the gutter with his author. Was it worthy? It is the wrong question. It was unavoidable that a man who has understood the organic nature of the Universe, forced himself against happiness and wisdom to sacrifice his life for that superorganism of mankind in time that I call history.


All this lead us to the consideration of the social organisms of history and economics, which obey as ALL other relational space-time beings, the same laws outlined very briefly in the previous paragraphs, because we are not different from any other entity of the Universe in ‘substance’ (we are made of vital space and last a finite time) and hence in our ‘worldcycles’ of existence, specially as we do not recognise them, so we cannot control ‘mentally’ and ‘create’ with those laws a perfect world and a planet where man thrives and survives. If we accepted and understood those laws, however the reform of the economic and political system to create a perfect super organism of history (mankind on time) would be simple and immediate…

How then History and economics evolve according to the application of the 2 new paradigms of ‘scalar, social super organisms’ that co-exist across the 5th dimension, and the 3 arrows of time, and its local processes of  informative evolution and entropic ‘devolution’ and death?

The scales of the fifth dimension and the processes of death of cultures (local travel to the past) and evolution of the information and life of societies (travel to the future), in History and Economics give birth to many fundamental new insights, of which we highlight 2:

The development of new models of societies and economic ecosystems, which evolve socially through the arrow of eusocial love and organic evolution into the present global economic ecosystem and the past cultures and civilisations and present industrial nations, which can be perfectly model with those laws, opening an enormous new field for the efficient organisation of societies.

And the study of the synchonicity and cycles of time and evolution of machines and economic ecosystems, which in my decade old models predicted accurately (c.92) the economic crashes of stock-markets and technological organic evolution of machines, now in the singularity age of final evolution of entropic machines (black hoel singularity) and informative ones (robotic singularity, AI), which are both potentially ‘organic’ in as much as they can ‘feed’ of matter without human interference and perceive, whenever they reach the complexity of form of animal beings we show in the post on the 2 future of history.

In the graph, a resume of the interconnected cycles of evolution of machines according to its 3 ages, and the parallel cycles of evolution of mankind, ending in entropic wars. The cycles predicted as earlier as 92, the 2008 ‘generational crash’ that closed the age of evolution of metal-minds, or third age of mechanical information, giving birth to the final age of the Industrial r=evolution or singularity age, when we shall assembly the 3 topological parts of machines into organic robots.

Time travels, from deaths to prophets reborn (:

10D³ history is quite a finding; as it explains all kind of processes thought completely considered before outside the realm of reason, such as religions, which actually respond to the process of ‘seminal birth’ of a new super organism, departing from memes (not form genes) similar in all scales.

Thus the only theme of 10D³ social sciences we shall treat here is ‘the existence’ of social organisms and religious gods in an upper plane of reality, the subconscious collective of a group of human beings imprinted NOT by memes but by genes, according to the laws of the fifth dimension in which a larger whole scale is programmed by the smaller parts – its human beings, ideas and instruments.

We have chosen it as it is the most provocative of all themes treated by ‘bio-history’

So let us explain you or rather just enunciate 3 FORMS OF TIME travel to the past, in physical, biological and social systems, among which we have chosen the most bizarre of them – the birth of a memetic mystical God, or subconscious collective mind of a civilisation  whose code of revelation acts as the equal dna of all cells, putting all the believers in synchronicity of action.

In the graph 3 travels in which a ‘seed of future information’, travels back to the local past of the super organism in codes:

– 1. A particle becoming a dying antiparticle; reason why we see less antiparticles than particles (another conundrum cern pretends to solve bombing you: as DEATH lasts only a quanta of time  according to its 5D equation: Death = Max. Spatial entropy x Min. Temporal information), in the same manner you see less corpses than living  even if there are the same number (all living will be corpses), as you  MUST multiply their duration in time x their number in space (minimal time duration of corpses makes them less evident than the living), you see less antiparticles (which last only a quanta of time) than particles.

2-  a seminal seed starting its palingenetic travel, as you are born as a ‘palingenetic=past form of genetic information’, a seed of the super organism of your father, which in the moment of orgasm reaches to balance that ‘seed to the past’ a point of static ‘immortal present’. And this orgasm-pleasure-present-immortal moment rises questions about the reinforcement in all scales of present-closed iterative cycles through the ‘scale of pure sensation’. It is the last scale of reality the pan psychic relationship between present to past pleasure/entropy/motion vs. past to future, informative pain/awareness?

All this said by the correspondence principle, 5D reduces to 4D in a single plane with a single arrow of time. But why you want to ‘reduce yourself’ to those limits, when an infinite number of clocks and scales unbounded await your mind? If YOU ARE A HUGE EGO, which WANTS TO CONTROL IT ALL and KNOW IT all, of course, reductionism will make you feel on top of the game and that is WHY, religions of ego and big-bangs are so popular. Yet as we shall  show now contrary to belief there is even more truth on jihad terrorism than cern’s terrorism, on mystical religions than mystical big-bangs. Even if all of them reduce the mind or superorganism of mankind to minimalist proportions – let us see how.

In the graph we show:

3- and informative prophet born a human cycle before the death of its superorganism (Jewish culture, dead in the month of Ab, a quanta of life-time ‘after’ the resurrection of its subconscious collective mind, ¥hwh in the ‘form’ of Christos, seminal seed of a new super organism of memetic history the equivalent to a genetic seed in the center), cloned in the mind of millions of believers. The range of phenomena  a understood when the proper arrows of time and the scalar nature of space is formalize would amaze a reader patient enough to go back to should and update its paradigm of time and space through  the 10D³ Non-Aristotelian ternary logic of time, and Non-Euclidean fractal structure of space.

I love the part of Jesus (: mostly cause it busts the balls of billions of nay-sayers of science who do NOT understand the subconscious collective gods of cultures.

Allah exists. And Allah Akbar is truth, Allah is bigger than its parts, its believers (: mystical reproduction is in any case healthier than black hole reproduction).

JESUS IS god, the god of social love, that pegs together human beings into a super organism, called christianity today on my view quite extinct.

And then there is that obnoxious Yhwh, the little racist guy that doesn’t let the rest of humans to be also chosen cells of the super organism of mankind. And that is too arrogant to survive, so its cells, ‘you’ know how they end, for not wanting to be part of Mankind.

But what the cells of Allah dying on Jihads, the fundamentalist christians with its old and modern inquisitions and the zealots of apartheid israel and wall street and evilwood with its neo-fascist militarist and brutal capitalist policies against the 99% do NOT understand is that the ONLY human God WORTH TO FIGHT FOR and die for is MANKIND and history our super organism in time.

Since bigger than Allah, more loving than Jesus, and miles above that racist little yhwh, THE ONLY GOD-SUPERORGANISM OF MANKIND THAT MATTERS IS MANKIND ITSELF, ALL MEN UNITED IN PEACE IN A GLOBAL PERFECT SUPERORGANISM, DEDICATED TO REPRODUCE WELFARE GOODS with its blood-reprodctive-economic system, guided by all just laws, the proper memes of love. So all those ‘gods’ are just stages in the growth of humanity towards a new wholeness, a new scale of the fifth dimension: HISTORY the super organism of mankind in time and space, whose cycles and 2 paths of future i described long ago to the indifference of the smaller parts, which do NOT want to evolve engaged in hateful memes that break the species into tribal nations, killing each other for the evolution of weapons to continue.

Since of all those dwarf gods, the  worst of all of them those germ(an)s of pure entropy who understand nothing and try to impose and reproduce its murderous memes all over the place, murdering mankind with weapons in all and every cycle of history. So God is just a mystical term for a Human super organism: as your genes are gods of your cells and your mind is god of your body’; your memes code you for good or for bad:

Alas, there is an entire Universe of 10D social sciences that models humanity as a super organism, economics as its blood-reproductive network and politics as its informative, nervous network, living over its entropic territory, Gaia, which we shall explore in a third post on 10D, besides the general post on the model, and the 2 posts on cosmology and physics, which gives you a nice 4-set upgrade for the stiences of the XXI c. if we are still here once i am gone not to bother le personnel with inconvenient truths and cern is closed by accident or wisdom.

As our concepts of knowledge are established today thought it is quite unlikely that ‘History resurrects’ and becomes properly manage to serve man, and make him again as the most perfect organism of information, we know of, the center of our research and goal – substituting the machines of entropy and motion physicists and by extension humanity worships.

But the bottom line of humanity in the way it dealt with the 5 time theorists that tried in different centuries to upgraded their subconscious collective to a higher ethical=social=organic=loving truth (creating a new ∆-scale) and intellectual understanding of the balance of the Universe between its yang-entropy and yin-information that brings the qi-energy of all beings into ‘being’ (so we could ad to the 4 mentioned modern scientific theorists of time-space, the work of the 4 most important philosophers of humanity of the verbal age, Aristotle and Jesus in the western ‘decoupling of subjective cultures’ more concerned with the super organism of history  (left) and Lao-Tse and Buddha in the eastern decoupling, more concerned with the super organism of the Universe)… which 10D also explains… is rather obvious:

When humans are given a choice between metal-atoms of entropy, weapons, information, gold and its organic combinations, ‘machines’ that kill their bodies, hypnotise their minds and substitute and atrophy them, ultimately giving them no meaningful deep knowledge and murdering the species vs. thought experiments of enlightened masters of languages and its mirror truths, which do not harm them, they have always rejected knowledge and survival for metal and death.

Hence the name I have given the species in our posts on the evolution of History, animetals; which are the ultimate cause of the most important cycles of time in history, the 800-80 years cycles of evolution of memes of metal, weapons and machines, which accelerate the rhythms of temporal evolution in this planet, and we treat extensively in a blog dedicated to the application of 5D to social sciences:

In the graph, ‘animetal warriors, who murder with iron, the strongest atom, the body of man; animetal ‘banksters’ hypnotise and enslave them with gold, the most informative, the mind, and ‘animetal physicists’  substitute our verbal, conceptual languages that describe the 3 arrows of time, with digital clocks and our visual, artistic eyes with telescopes and microscopes, become lesser human beings, feeling ‘different’ to us, life, hence applying NOT the law of eusocial evolution between ‘undistinguishable’ beings, who come togehter into tighter boson wholes in any scale (Einstein-Bose statistics) but entropic, ‘gaseous’ states of ‘heat’ and memoriless motions, collding each other in dog-eat dog societies, the lowest state of ‘big-bang’ existence promoted by their philosophies of reality, the universe shall discharge for the higher goal of creating ‘at least a boson of dense matter’ or an internet brain of collective robots – the 2 most likely futures if humans keep their ethic=∆-social, and intellectual=Tƒ ‘humind membrain’ on its present deranged state. 

To notice the acceleration of information towards the future, which makes of history yet another vortex of information that we can express in a wave form (the graph) or in a particle form towards its singularity central moment of death or resurrection of the human ethic, verbal mind that could control lethal machines and weapons and ensure our survival.  In the graph, from one of my earliest books on 5D³ social sciences, ‘the vortex of history’, I draw the 3rd age of mankind, the age of the tree of metal, and its accelerated vortex of information. To notice the predictability of the model, which pointed at 2008, after 3 generational 72 year cycles of evolution and overproduction of machines as the final crash of the age of minds of metal or age of america.

So History was predictable as all other cycles of time through topological evolution. Since after the age of limbs of metal, iron and steam machines, or age of england, ending in the 1857 crash of train stocks; the industrial evolution followed its second topological age of bodies of metal and electrochemical german engines, ending in the 1929 crash of cars,  +72 years, latter – another human life generation; followed by the American age of minds of metal, ending, i forecasted in 2008, 72 years latter, after another crash of overproduction of chip machines… followed by the age of the singularity or age of robots and cosmic bombs, which is the present age of AI   that should end weaker carbon life in this planet. All my books though proposed the solutions, to build a sustainable, perfect organism of history based in welfare life goods and memes of life.

But animetal elites, our neuronal informative people-castes in control of informative metal-money, entropic metal-weapons and energetic, organic machines would have none of it.

As such I have always since i completed the models of bio-history, bio-economics, relational cyclical time and fractal space being ignored and censored with null distribution as those other 4 self-styled time theorists. Deja vu.

But as we humans neither control the tree of technology nor do care to learn the true laws of time and evolve properly our super organism, we are ENTERING our final age of entropy, as both ‘species of the singularity age’, AI of maximal information and BH of maximal entropy come to ‘hunt us’ from a more evolved potential future.

As such the perfect, impersonal Universe will not allow us to survive, because as ‘human beings’ our ethical and intellectual standing deserves respect, as animetals, and physicists are their paradigm, we are just slaves of other atoms, evolving them into the ∆+1 mechanical scale and into the III family of denser masses, and the game of time will choose them.




The Universe is a fractal super organism made of…

  •   Asymmetries between its 4 Dual components, which can either annihilate or evolve, which we shall call Balance≈become symmetric or become Perpendicular/antysmmetric:
  • S:  Space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
  • ∆: distributed in ∆±i relative fractal scales that come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ð:  a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
  • @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being. Because the scientific method requires OBJECTIVE measure of the existence of a mind, which is NOT perceivable directly, we infer its existence by the fact a system performs the 5 external actions, which can be measure objectively, in the same manner we infer the existence of gravitational in-form-ative forces by its external actions upon massive objects. Hence eliminating the previous limit for a thorough understanding of the sentient, informative Universe. And further classify organic in simplex minds – all, which must gauge information, move and feed to survive, and complex systems, those who can perform a palingenetic reproductive, social evolution, ∆-1: ∑∆-1≈∆º.

The study of those 4 elements of all realities, its actions and ternary operandi, which result in a social evolution together of the 2 + elements (the balanced body-wave and informative @particle-mind, and the entropic destruction or ab=use of the – simpler, lineal limb-potential-prey, which structures the dynamic ‘Generator Equation’ of all Space-time Systems of the Universe, written in its simplest form as a singularity-mind equation, O x ∞ = K or in dynamic way, S@<≈>∆ð, is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.

There are many views on such simple elements, specially when we fully understand the key principles of its operandi which are either opposite, Darwinian, or social, parallel – a principle which is as most of the principles ignored by science, vital, organic, biological; and either bring together the asymmetries between lower planes of more information and larger planes of more energy or bring them into destruction.

So goes for the asymmetry between | and O forms, depending on how they come to each other tangentially or ‘penetrating’ to reproduce LITERALLY as we fuk each other’s gender (: i tell you is all vital geometries. 

And so goes for the different 1st and third ages of existences…

So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, the most well known that between:

names (forms) and verbs (motions); colours of blue and red, form and motion which can either be played reproductively into green or anti-complementary into yellow, the colour of eviL destruction, of gold (:

It is all in the codes of colours, we shall see even in the game of Nature.

All is in the codes of the Universe and its operators, also clear in mathematics, with the duality of inverted operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª, ∫∂.

So the simplest method of extracting a meaningful quantity of information on a being or event requires to comment on the 4±operandi ‘5’ perspectives, even when we study as we do in the first line, those elements in themselves. In this post we shall deal thus with time from the perspective of space, time, symmetries, scales and mind languages that ‘stop it’ in the singularity of t=motion zero, from black holes to eddies to charges, to brains to frozen genetic DNA…

Assymetries and dimensions.

Now, when two systems come together, there will be a relationship which depends on the equality of its 3 different parts will give combinations to an array of possible ‘consequences’, which can be tabulated in logic ‘truth or false’ type of graphs – which I will someday find on my files and put on the blog. Let us consider the basic relationships according to the equations/dimensions of information (1D), reproduction (3D)…

1D (T.œ¹) ≈ 1D (T.œ²) they evolve socially through the 5th dimension of scalar social growth, when they understand each other’s information or…

1D T.Œ¹≠ 1D T.œ² + 3D T.Œ¹≈ 3D T.œ² + T.Œ¹>T.œ². That is, they  will enter into a Darwinian relationship that destroys the T.œ with lesser existential e x i force, when their 1D information differs but their 3D energy is similar… or

1D, 3D T.œ¹ ≠ 1D, 3D T.œ² they will ignore each other in parallel Universes as different ‘cat alleys’ when neither their information  or energy is similar. 

We have introduced in the graph with a bit more of complexity the logic dimensional laws that define how systems IN ANY scale of the inverse, from Atomic Ions or crystals to human societies relate to each other in darwinian, perpendicular ‘tearing’ topological relationships that ‘break’ the closing membrane of one species disrupting its existence, or will keep a mean distance to form social networks of communication that will grow into super organisms, starting the emergent process of evolution of species into a new ∆§cale of social existence, so you understand that in the Universe organic, geometric and scalar relationships are symbiotic to each other. 

Its connection as everything else WITH THE 5Dimensions of reality is obvious. As it determines if the outcome of a relationship will be Darwinian=entropic or social=evolutionary.

It corresponds to the classic 3rd axiom of congruence which all geometric systems require, but unlike the classic postulate that defined only external congruence, as it worked in a single ‘dimension’ of points with no parts, the new postulate is far richer in meanings as it introduces fully the ‘different degrees’ of congruence according to which number of dimensions both systems have similar. In fact, it establishes a limit of similarity, to define identity, in a postulate similar to Pauli’s exclusion principle:

‘There is not in the Universe two systems which are identical in its 5 Dimensions, as in that case they become one’.

Indeed, it is NOT truth that 2 bosons occupy the same place in space-time, because quantum physics ignores the fourth and fifth scalar dimensions of relative social evolution that is the real place in which those bosons are found, when observed closely:

In the graph, we can see how a boson condensate grows in the fifth dimension of social evolution, ‘rising’ beyond the single space-time continuum where they were initially located, to reach a higher order. We can then talk of a ‘tail of absolute space-time’ being formed.

Classic 3rd axiom of Euclid ≈ modern 4th postulate of Non-Aristotelian logic.

In classic geometry, the 3rd axiom of congruence hold a special place, as the 5th because of its apparent contradictions. How can we determine geometrically a quality of ‘equality’? Schopenhauer among modern philosophers noticed this contradiction, but few realized of the importance of the postulate.

In the upgrading of formal sciences, the realisation of the ‘redundancy’ of the fifth postulate of non-euclidean geometry – definition of a point with parts through which infinite parallels can cross, equivalent to the first axiom – definition of a point with breath; and the logic nature of the fifth postulate, prompted us to reclassify them NOT as geometric but logic postulate which dealt with the rules of ‘engagement’ of vital geometry.

So the fifth postulate defined a mind, of which depending of the number of parallels that can cross it, we shall find, different @nalytic minds and graphs of perception of information in the Universe, of which 3 canonical frames of reference, the Euclidean, hyperbolic and elliptic mind correspond to the 3 parts of any system (lineal potentials-limbs, hyperbolic waves-bodies and polar particles/heads).

On the other hand the fourth postulate of congruence has also a great deal of variations regarding the degree of equality between two geometric forms as they know have 3 parts, as ‘T.œ’. made of 3 parts.  So congruence is relative as no system is equal to other in its 3 parts and at the same time occupy in the ∆+1 scale or world the same position.

The equality of the 3 parts however will determine if the interrelation between points will be constructive positive – when identity increases; or destructive, when identity or even inversion of coordinates happens. I.e. for example indistinguishable particles can become bosons and accumulate its form; fermions however would annihilate its wave state in antisymmetry to each other.

So the fourth postulate, is as important or perhaps even more than the 5th that defines a mind. And it is also related to the fourth dimension of entropy, when two forms are dissimilar, do not understand each others’ languages of communication and either ignore each other or enter into a predatory relationship

An exhaustive analysis of all the possible forms of relationship between two given points-beings, thus will be the fundamental guidance in all scales to establish the rules of engagement and according to the relative existential momentum/force of the being, who will dominate and how it will exercise its power over the other – or in identical particles, what social form will emerge of that communication.


To express that method in a concise dynamic way, we use the first line of this blog:

widened for a more complex ‘Disomorphic analysis in the 3rd line, where we fully analyse the ‘more complete Generator equation’ which includes all the main asymmetries, symmetries and anti symmetries of the ternary elements of a world cycle of time, an organism of space and its complete scalar timespace super organism:

In epistemological terms, the relational space-time theory of the Universe attempts to describe the properties of all systems that exist with the same Disomorphic laws derived of the fact that indeed, all systems of reality regardless of its variations are 5Dimensional organic systems of space-time, ∆@≈§ð; whose properties are derived of the possible variations of those 5 Dimensions which define in space a super organism, made of nested super organisms, of which the entity we study will be a part and in time a world cycle of existence between generation and extinction.

What makes more complex reality though is the existence of a scalar ‘5th dimension’ of space-time that extends reality beyond our shallow 1 Dimensional description; and permits an enormous range of beings, all of which will co-exist in 3 of such planes, forming thanks to that co-existence the essential form of reality, the super organism:

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scale of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales.

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scales is simple as all space-time metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

The astounding similarity of all what exists makes then possible to formalize reality with a synoptic formalism that expresses the nature of those 5 Dimensions in space and time, depicted in the next graph:

We shall call the philosophy of science that applies the formalism to all ‘scales of ‘stiences’ and all species by the principle of correspondence GST, (general systems theory), since it is the most recent ‘discipline’ that tried to explain reality as a organic system made of organic systems, and it was in the milieu of the science during the years I was chair of duality at the international systems congress, before breaking up with academia, where I gave the basis of the model in a series of conferences at the turn of the century.

It also fits  the name given to the ‘Fractal Generator’ equation of Timespace beings, which as all generators of fractal systems, is a simple feed back equation of 3 terms that ‘generates’ all beings of reality departing from the 3 ‘conserved’ quantities of the physical universe, cyclical angular momentum (time clocks), lineal momentum (space planes) and its combined hyperbolic energy; now broken into infinite fractal beings with a cyclical membrane, a singularity mind and a vital body-wave energy between them:

∑∆-1: $-potentials/limbs<∆º: ∑∏-bodywaves>∆+1: ðƒ:particles-heads.

So we define the Universe as a ‘timespace super organism, Ab. T.Œ, sum of fractal Timespace super organisms: T.Œ≈∑T.œ.

Thus, the Universe is a fractal organism of scalar, topological space and cyclical time, which can be define by a series of ‘anti symmetries’ between opposite topologies, ages and scales that come together in parallel as complementary forms or annihilate each other perpendicularly. We thus reflect those facts in a Fractal generator that resumes those ternary symmetries and the process of social convergence (5th dimension) and entropic divergence (4th dimension):

The generator equation defines the Universe as a fractal sum of timespace super organisms, extended through 3 ∆±1 relative scales of space-time, ruled by 5D metric equations, such as the product of the size in space and speed in time of the clocks of information of the Non-Æ points of the 3 scales are constant, allowing the symbiosis of its 3 ternary parts, which exchange lineal momentum, energy and cyclical momentum among them, the 3 conserved parts of all systems made of lineal limbs/potentials, ∆-1 micro points (quantum atoms, cells) organised in superposed additive herds that move the system and dominate its young relative past age; part of 3 ∆o iterative, physiological networks, the organism proper that iterates into a dynamic present the system (thermodynamic matter, or multicellular organisms in physical and biological systems), guided by a relative future particle-head that holds the linguistic mind or relative future survival will that guides and synchronises with its clocks the system as a whole in the external ∆+1 world; where it will perform 5, aeiou actions gauging I-nformation, to a-ccelerate=move towards a field of e-nergy in which to feed, to reproduce into an offspring of clones to evolve socially into a larger universal ∆+1 new plane or superoganism of 5Dimensional space-time actions parts, before it exhausts its vital energy, stops moving and explodes back into its entropic parts in its big-bang death. So we can define its 5Dimensions in time through its world cycle of generation, from its ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves and emerges into the ∆º scale in which it will act with its 3 dimensional networks, the 1D point/head/particle, that moves in 2D planes to feed with 3D energy.

The best way to study this reality once we understand its epistemological principles, ‘fractal scales of topological space’, temporal ages, ternary symmetries, and complementarity vs. perpendicularity, is through the concept of 5 dimensions in space symmetric to 5 motions in time.  

Then the fun starts, but given the ‘non-aristotelian logic’ of those ternary anti symmetries and complementarities, and the difficulty of the humind (ab. human mind) to perceive this complex logic, given its one-dimensional self-centred ego-paradox, view, we have deviced two epistemological concepts, the Rashomon effect that focuses on the study of the 5 main Dimensions of the system with a perceptive point of view – that is as a symmetry between the mind perception of the whole and the multiple temporal elements, S@≈∆ð, and the Disomorphic method which focuses in the process of a world cycle that generates a super organism and destroys it.

It is difficult to explain you why after 30 years of studying alone the fractal, organic Universe, I settled for those 2 formalisms. It might be possible to study the kaleidoscopic Universe in many other ways, most amenable to modern science, with an external mathematical point of view, but what I like to reveal from reality is what huminds do not accept, the sentient nature and linguistic perception of the moving reality as fixed spatial forms, as a maya of the senses, which is achieved with the Rashomon effect, and the organic, vital, moving nature of the world cycle of a super organism, which is achieved through the Disomorphic method – that should be on the long term, the canonical method of understanding reality.

The organic and sentient properties of the universe. 

This said the equation is a logic equation, whose fundamental properties to facilitate creation are ‘relativity’, ‘anti-symmetries’ and ‘organicism’, words hardly understood in the context of present philosophy of science.

Let us deal first with relativity, then organicism and finally with symmetry.

Absolute relativity

All what exists being homologic by virtue of possessing the same Dimensions in its organic form, and living similar worldcycles, albeit self-centred in different scales of the fifth dimension of the scalar Universe is absolutely relative, in an infinite whole, in which all beings are limited to 3 organic scales, 3 ages of time and 3 adjacent forms of space:

Human egos are the main bias to fully understand the Universe and its organic properties and multiple minds≈languages. So humanity divides between mathematical and verbal creationists who think their language created the Universe and only the properties described with it are ‘worthy’ to know. Notice how Mr. Dirac denies the Verbal God but affirms there is a Mathematical one. In true form, Leibniz, Einstein, who considered the ultimate substances of reality space and time from where we shall derive all its dimensional, isomorphic laws, were far more ‘realists’ in its search for ultimate principles. Each language then according to its synoptic capacity to carry information will mirror in the ‘finitesimal’ space-time of a mind limited in volume and duration only part of the total information of the Universe and all its fractal T.œs. So its knowledge will always be limited and self-centred as the language has a perspective with his mind at the centre, giving origin to the equation of any mind: O-finitesimal mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe = Constant World. The Universe is infinite, but each ‘mind-language’ mirrors only part of its scales of space-time, and lasts a finite duration, extending a finite size.

The paradox of the mind confuses the whole Universe with its limited self-centred world of perception, BUT reality is absolutely relative and we must just discover the biased ‘theories’ the humind has established to keep himself in the centre, which contrary to belief do exist still in all sciences, from the entropic big-bang of lineal time that reduces the two arrows of time to the lineal entropy of physicists clocks, blatantly ‘forgetting the cyclical vortex of gravitational information’ in galaxies that warp ‘space into time’, to social sciences which cannot accept the organic evolution of machines, the higher importance of the super organisms of history and its informative, legal and economic, reproductive networks in the control of societies, to biology, which denies eusocial evolution to maintain the ego on top and the vital properties of inorganic matter, as even quarks and electrons reproduce, absorb energy, gauge information and evolve socially in magnetic fields – hence have ALL the properties of our supposed ‘unique’ carbon atom.

Organicism. From the co-existence of beings in 3 different scales of reality, ∆±1, that is form the fractal structure of space, it follows the organic nature of reality as flows of energy and information and motion between those scales based in the symbiosis of smaller beings that have more information and larger wholes that enclose the parts, precludes organic properties.  Unlike the simplex physical description of the Universe, as an extension in space, where the time parameter of change only is relevant in the descriptions of motions within the fractal Universe of any parts of it, as if nothing else would matter, reserving organic and sentient properties, under the ‘ego paradox’ for the human species only, our interest is much more profound as we consider all parts of the Universe homeomorphic to each other and hence with the same properties that humans do have, and vice versa. into all the properties that the simplex physical description misses, as they are not susceptible to me written in mathematical equations, or are not observable, directly but can be inferred from the actions they produce. It is then possible through those indirect methods of observation and departing of the homologic, isomorphic properties of all beings, deduce the non-observable properties of being by its external effects.

So we shall be able to consider through the actions of the beings, which are all similar in search of survival, the existence of singularity-minds in all of them.

Sentient Universe.

How energy becomes information: Energy never dies.

The process of existence, and its arrows of organicism are intimately related, as they evolve into each other.

If the first act of a living organism is to feed, its second act is to transform that energy into information, and then perceive it. Energy never dies but transforms itself into information. In this manner feeding becomes information. The simplicity of the Universe is awesome. It should not surprise us. After all we are in a Universe with only 2 parameters. So from one energy, comes two, form, in-form-ation.

Information, the second substance of the Universe.

The Universe is made of two substances, energy and information. Both have opposite properties, and yet both attract and mix each other, in all kind of macro-organs of energy and information, that we call bodies and brains. If in the microcosmic organisms of atomic nature, information is seen always as a force, as we cannot easily study the microcosmic inner organs that process energy and information inside the atom, when we grow in size, the organism becomes visible, and we recognize an organ of information, and sensorial organs that absorb the forces of the external Universe. In this manner information translates from micro to macro sizes with its properties. What are those properties? Information is small, complex in form, cyclical, stored in time, more than in space, in logic dimensionality, in languages, made of very complex, very small, very fast systems of sharing diminutive flows of energy, called in-form-ation.

Each language perceives a partial truth.

But why there are brains that absorb tiny flows of energy with a lot of form, called in-form-ation?

As all in the game of existence, because to accumulate information helps you to survive, to locate energy and feed and continue the game of existence.

What information does is to offer an organism maps of the Universe, virtual worlds, complex representations of reality, with a lot of formal detail, that map out the Universe and helps the organism to survive. All organisms perceive and react to information in one or other manner, and we call that property of organic systems, perception.

The flows of energy that become information in the brains of organisms, cause the organism to react to the external universe. That is the second arrow of life.

After feeding, organisms transform energy into information and react organically to that information.
Bear in mind though that information comes in many shapes and forces. So each brain perceives a different information, a different map of the Universe…

Truth and perception: multiple languages, multiple truths

If you smell a carrot you have a certain perception of the carrot, if you see it you have another perception, if you use a microscope you have a third perception, if you eat the carrot you have a fourth perception.

Each perception is a relative truth on the existence of a mass of energy and information known as a carrot.
Yet you will only consider a ‘scientific description’ of the carrot, the numeric truths related to scientific measure; the photographs and light perception taken on the carrot with scientific instruments.

However a rabbit does not need the scientific method of metal-instrumental evidence, to smell the carrot without seeing it. He knows through smelling information that the carrot is. Thanks to such information he will locate under the Earth a carrot, faster than a scientist. Smell is part of the truth of the carrot, and the rabbit is an intelligent thinker of carrots in smelling terms.

If for the scientist the light image of the carrot is the carrot, for the rabbit the smell of the carrot is the carrot. He just has a different approach to knowledge. Yet neither of them has all the truth on the carrot, which only belongs to the carrot itself. For the same reason we say that light perception and scientific truths derived of measures taken with metal-instruments are only partial truths, partial languages of perception of the total Universe.

It seems proved that light space is only 1-10% of The Universe. That light only scans 1-10% of the total space, perhaps more than the nose of the rabbit , but still very little, to make the kind of arrogant statements that the scientific method makes. The rest is dark matter which exists and communicates with other forces. This implies we will never be able to know totally the Universe by the scientific method, which is like a blind ‘smelling of the Universal carrot’.

The Universe is a mass of energy and information, which stores the truth only into its total self. You are the truth of yourself, and any perception of you will only be a linguistic approximation to your total truth- yourself.

Digital science however denies this, with an arrogance proper of inquisitions of thought. Since what we call the scientific method affirms that reality and evidence, total truth, comes from ‘scientific’ measure of distances and spaces, according to metal-eye machines that perceive space [telescopes today evolved into cameras] and metal-clock temporal meters [today evolved into computers].

All other languages of time and space [such as human verbs and eyes] and the worlds they might create, are not relevant to science. If anything, the error of subjective arrogance, proper of Middle Age religions, grew with science, that limits evidence of truth and existence, to beings that can be perceived and measured with metallic instruments, and clocks. Let’s consider with a critical eye such approach to knowledge. Dark matter exists not only in the outskirt of Galaxies, but by mere logic, we have to postulate that dark matter exists here, around us.

That there are many systems of communication that we do not perceive with light. Even within you, as acupuncture proves, there are structures of energy and information that cannot be ‘seen’. After all we do not see gravitation and yet it regulates the movement of all masses.
So true knowledge would be a method of understanding the Universe, that would allow us to have strong, probable truths about the 90% of what it is not perceived by the scientific method, of light-clock evidence.
In a world of partial information, truths are always relative probabilities, guesses, approximations to Reality through a language with partial information.

We conclude that the scientific method of ‘total evidence’, and all the statements of science in that path, are pure, naive arrogance of which metal scientists are so often guilty. One of the fathers of science, Mr. Kepler wrote in his book: ‘I am writing a book to be read either now or by posterity, it matters not. It can wait a century for a reader, as God Himself has waited 6.000 years for a witness.’ Yet the witness was not Mr. Kepler, self-appointed the only intelligence comparable to that of God=the Universe; but the clock and telescope of Mr. Kepler. One of many linguistic witnesses of the infinity of linguistic observers that the Universe hosts. The truths of Mr. Kepler, were mere measures of the rhythms of energy feeding (gravitational space-time deformation) by stars; not the absolute truths about stars. If you are an ant that sees men eating=deforming food everyday at 2 o’ clock, in the refectory of your limited Universe; you might think men are automata, and you know all about men. Yet you just will be an ignorant ant.

When Mr. Kepler and Mr. Newton saw how celestial bodies deform space-time energy into gravitational cycles with regularity, they displayed the same arrogance of judgment.

Now we know that closer to the center of galaxies, where stars are more evolved, they have abnormal movements, maybe free. We know about stars – about the Universe – very little compared with what we ignore.
The conclusion is that truth is not the function of a single language, but the accumulation of perceptions with many languages, that inform us about the Universe. That no language is superior to other. A language creates perception, a map or virtual world that represents reality but it is not the true reality only the accumulation of languages, and perceptions brings us the absolute truth:

Partial, linguistic truths=Total Truth of the being

A form of knowledge as classic science based in a single language (mathematics) that cannot even acknowledge those linguistic limits to its inquire, is far more primitive in its quest of truth, that a theory of languages, that considers relativism of perception, and creates from that relativism, a wider theory of knowledge, based on the existence of multiple truths and minds, and ways of perceiving reality, one for each language of perception of The Universe.

A theory of Truth: the Disomorphic multiple linguistic method

If we want to advance beyond the scientific method, or the smelling method or the verbal method, we rather start to explore the Universe with all the languages of man, and accept the existence of languages and minds beyond human perception that we cannot decode. Such knowledge requires also to use a different method of knowledge besides the scientific method. Since the scientific method is ‘one-dimensional’, ‘uni-linguistic’ and accepts only mathematical truths. True knowledge however is by no means reduced to a single language as the scientific method is.

On the contrary in a linguistic method, we are obliged in the research of Universal Organisms, to use all languages and informations we can gather.

We see, and smell, and touch, and observe temporally with words the species of the Universe. We have many languages of perception besides mathematics.
 So once we have gathered information with all those languages – including mathematics and the scientific method, perhaps the most important method of knowledge, that we do not reject but merely put in perspective – we can use the concept of analogy, and observe what all those informations and languages have in common. Only then we will have an analogic, probable truth, made with multiple informations about reality.

We might call such wider method, the linguistic method.
 The linguistic method searches for languages and virtual worlds – minds constructed with those languages. It compares and extracts common formal laws from all information, and temporal languages of perception. In this manner we advance a step deeper in our search of knowledge. Such linguistic vision of the Universe allow us to jump into a theory of languages as means of perception and communication between Universal species that share information and energy thanks to those languages. Now we will be exploring not only the language=virtual world of light [science], but also the fact that there are many different languages, that create many different virtual worlds, representation of the Universe, which in general have a purpose. The purpose of those languages=virtual worlds is to ensure the survival of the species which observes reality with that virtual world of perception.

 Anti-Symmetry. And social parallelism.

Anti-Symmetry though is the fundamental property in terms of logic thought of the Universe. To fully grasp it we consider the ternary symmetries of scales, ages and adjacent topologies, which structure the being internally through ∆±1 scales, in time through 3 ages and in space externally through its 3 topological forms, all of them expressed in the generator equation:

∆-1: Generation > ∆º: $t |-lineal limbs/potentials (dominant in a past young age) <: ∑∏ iterative, hyperbolic ø-body-waves (dominant in an iterative present) > ∆+1: O-Particle-head, which commands the being as a whole in an external world, dominant in its future 3rd age, before the system explodes entropically ∆+1<<∆-1.

To notice then how reality can be observed through those anti-symmetries, which mean the properties of each of the two extremes of the 3 ternary elements of reality are anti-symmetric to each other and so they cancel each other. That is cells/atoms/individuals are to the wholes antisymmetric as they maximise information vs. energy-size; limbs/potentials are to the heads/particles also antisymmetric in lineal and cyclical form; and the first age of life or relative past dominated by lineal motion is antisymmetric to the 3rd age dominated by cyclical form. 

But because the system is ternary, the anti symmetries of time-ages, space-topologies and scales become merged into the present-hyperbolic body-wave interacting and mixing together to form a single one. 

So the best expression of the game is a present body-wave breaking constantly its symmetry into two opposite functions that can either annihilate each other, as waves do or complementary reinforce each other, concepts those hardly used in science beyond physics and even there ill-understood that now we expand to all sciences.

Indeed, in physics much has been done about the term symmetry which is NOT really that relevant, because even when physicists define symmetry they are in fact talking of a mirror symmetry, which is an inversion or a bilateral symmetry which is also an inversion so they are forms of topological antisymmetry, of two identical social parts.

Yet the game as a game of identical social parts is an element of fractal organicism. This parallelism of beings which are clones by reproduction of each other and the asymmetry between systems that are complementary to each other and meet in the middle term, are essential elements to make sense of how reality, comes together and pegs into a single being.

Terms used for the expression of absolute relativity, organicism and asymmetry.

We use three names for the formalism:

GST or general systems theory, which relates it by correspondence to classic organicist theories. This is then more used in common discourses.

S@≈∆ð and ∆@st, which focuses in the 5 Dimensions of all ‘dust’ of space-time, all T.œ. This is then more used in the formalism of dimensions, or Disomorphic method and its simplified version, the ‘Rashomon effect’ (which is the most used element for extracting a wide range of varieties and properties of beings, and classify common knowledge of them within those 5 Dimensions.)

-Γst, which is the formal equation that unifies them all and the best description to study the parts of the being, and through its sub-equations connect the equations of classic sciences with the parts of a super organism or its age in time.

¬Æ: Finally  is the linguistic non-aristotelian, non-euclidean laws, the most formal level of the discipline that r=evolves mathematics and logic adapting it to the properties of fractal space and multi causal antisymmetric ternary logic across 3 planes of space-time, 3 ages and 3 topologies.

LET US THEN OF THE MANY EPISTEMOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS in the understanding of the multiple logic and non-euclidean fractal organic structure of the Universe, consider 3 basic principles of T.œ derived of the properties of space-time and the 3±i elements of reality. Namely:

  1. The Ðisomorphic method; that is, the common qualities of all systems due to the fact they are made of 5 + 5 St dimensions. So we shall study for all systems 10 corresponding properties derived of those dimensions
  2. The Rashomon Effect; that is, the fact that in a Universe of 5 moving time-dimensions or real elements for all systems, symmetric and interconnected, and 5 mental mirrors of them, we can observe in each language mirror, a kaleidoscopic number of similar views, expressed with similar equations or sentences, taken from each of those 3±i perspectives.
  3. The generator equation; and its formal laws, which expresses above all common verbal, visual and mathematical languages of man, with a simple  symbolism for those dimensions, how they reproduce, evolve, create and destroy the super organisms of reality through its worldcycles of time.


In the graph, the stience of all stiences is the Theory of Organic Unification of all Existences of the Universe, GENERAL SYSTEMS STIENCES, G.ST. A Theory of Everything Organic ab.T.Œ…


‘Complexity (GST) will be the science of the XXI C.’ Hawking

A human being is part of a whole, called by us the Universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings, as something separated from the rest–a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circles of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.’

‘I would like to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details’. Einstein

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

The paradigm of information though is completely different in his philosophy. Since fractal, ‘Relational’ space-time does have a philosophy attached to it, called organicism which is completely necessary to make sense of its 4 elements, ∆•ST.

Of those 4 elements, obviously the easiest to accept is topological space, as it is quite standard science, validated in the case of the Universal space by Einstein’s 3 solutions to EFE, which reflects the ternary topologies of space.

Next comes the 3 ‘ages’ of time, which are a subconscious wisdom of all humans. Then, I found most people to shut down their ‘aristotelian mind’ comprehension, when we deal with ∆-scales and the co-existence of parts and wholes, which share the same space but are displaced in time. 

As here humans have a huge difficulty to understand what Einstein, the deterministic ‘right guy’, told us: ‘the separation of past, future and present is an illusion’. But where people stop in their tracks and reject the model, is when we introduce the equation of the mind, the limits of human @ristotelian thought, and the relativism and panpsychism of the Universe. So first I ‘hid’ this variable and made just an external description of it all with the other 3, looking more like ‘science’.

But as all modern scientists and philosophers since Darwin and Schopenhauer understood, without the will, the biological program of evolution, action and survival carried by the linguistic, pure informative mind, the whys of existence are imposible to define (latter we shall see that a 5th element, attached to the duality of space-motion, which gives us ‘pleasure’ and time-information, which gives us ‘pain’ will be required to warp it all).

ALL THIS of course cannot be proved as it is internal to the mind (perception, awareness, sensation). So we could get away with it and eliminate the mind and its painful perceptions of information and erasing pleasures of motions. But it won’t then give the total answer. So what we do is rather simple.

As we have defined man as a space-time being like all other beings, it follows that the method of knowledge of Socrates, ‘know yourself’ is a key element to project our inner non-observable properties in all other entities of reality which are also made of space-time.

Essentially what the physicist and by extension the scientist did was to REDUCE the Universe to a series of mechanical automaton locomotions, as DOGMA that allowed man to remain now the ONLY intelligent, sentient, vital being; and this IS an absolute taboo no scientist would dare to break – the excuse being, we cannot ‘measure’ with mechanical instruments, perception and vital properties.

Of course the ultimate consequence of this reductionism has been to made of the ‘machine’ the new God and dethrone the human organism and life, bringing the final ‘laugh of the gods’, the creation of a world of machines for whom humans increasingly obsolete to them, toil. So science today is NOT the logic search for human deep knowledge of the principles of reality – the thoughts of God, mind of the Universe, but the massive, mechanical acquisition of ‘measurable data’ with computers and its rods of time (the single mechanical clocks) and space, (the light constant speed) – in other words, the creation of a digital mind of computer machines, which are the new ‘God of knowledge’; even if humans do understand so little of its meaning. While any attempt to bring back to the Universe organic, vital, sentient properties and to explain truths with human languages, besides math, is shunned off.

Ultimately what the fundamentalist view of some ‘mathematical physics’ as the only language of time that matters so common among lesser minds, hides is a deep ignorance of the foundations of physics – merely as it is taught today, the pouring of data on certain physical scales of reality into mathematical equations, hence a mathematical appendix; itself a series of logic connections based in the language of ±truth, hence a logic, causal temporal science. We shall therefore advance and clarify on the foundation of those science to fully grasp why ‘time is all’, all lines as Kepler had it, are parts of cyclical trajectories, all motions become conservative closed ‘world cycles’ in an immortal cyclical Universe of infinite cyclical space-time beings living those ‘world cycles of existence’.

Of course, man also has an a priori point of view  or belief – the selfish mind that prevents us to ‘rationally understand’ we are not above any other system of the Universe so one of the first things we have done is to define the mind as one of the many world-views of reality possible, to put the objective mirror and perspective over man.

The isomorphic scales of the fifth dimension.  The new principles of the stientific method.

Physicist in that sense like hyperbolic catchy names for their simplex, incomplete theories of reality, buttressed with powerpoint presentations, mechanical data and complicated math jargons. Fair enough. But when you understand them, you want to go the way of Schopenhauer, seeking for deeper whys. So we evolve from lines to world cycles, from a single language to all the languages of the Universe, and from T.o.e. the name physicists give to a Theory of everything (really just the search for a unification of the forces of nature, a rather simple equation in 5D metric, as charges and masses are just the vortices of time of two different scales of reality, as we shall show in our posts on astronomy).

We shall therefore this ‘3rd age of evolution of the stientific method’ after the experimental method of Aristotle and the scientific method of Galileo, T.Œ, the theory of Everything Organic, where œ is the symbol for the supœrganism (ab super organism), the fundamental particle of the Universe; as we add to the knowledge of experience (Aristotle’s method of looking at Nature), and the data provided by mechanisms to observe time and space (clocks and telescopes), and the exhaustive use of mathematics (the ad ons of Galileo), the isomorphic laws of all space-time organisms, resumed in the 10 ‘isomorphisms’ of the 2nd line of the blog.

Thus T.Œ is based on the cyclical nature of Time and fractal structure of space evident to all systems. This Organic Structure is both Simplex but also Ternary Complex due to the 3 arrows-dimensions of time, it symmetry with the 3 organic parts of all systems, and the ternary structure of the scales of the 5th dimension that co-exist together in organic systems.

Thus the ternary Cyclical=repetitive nature of fractal space-time systems and events becomes the constrain and cause of all the laws of Science and T.Œ merely systematises those laws by extracting them from the fundamental space, time elements of reality.

Then in each of those scales of space-time, we find that the common laws of 5D space-time Correspond with the laws of the species of each scale and its previous theories.

So all this, we resume in a formula, T.Œ=SC3 that embeds those Principles of Philosophy of Science that all Organic Time-space Systems Follow, born of the duality between the Simplex, S, principles and the ‘ternary Complexity’, C3 by repetition of those events.


The disomorphic method…

studies the 5 elements, ∆, @, s,≈, t of any being, in further analytical sub-divisions, as each will have 3 parts≈functions≈forms and this is the basic method of analysis explained in this web and applied likely by future researchers to enclose ALL stiences, equations and laws discovered by man in an encyclopaedia of GST.

Let as then use those elements to formalize in a meaningful way all the linguistic min concepts of human physics, first considering that we can structure almost all systems that we humans observe with 3 x 3 ∆st dimensions +1 wholeness dimension for the mind that ‘compacts’ the parts into the being.

So while we have used following the correspondence principle the term fifth scalar dimension of timespace, after the four classic ones, the best, most proper way to define entities, when we go into formalism is to consider them to have 3 x 3 ∆st dimensions and then the ‘whole’ warping dimension of the mind, which will be ‘the singularity and membrane’ of the ‘open ball’ which we all are. Indeed, think on your mind:

You are aware of our language, in your cogito ergo sum thought stream, and your external senses, openings to the world in your skin membrane. You do not see, feel or perceive hardly the cells of your vital space, so you are the external membrain, name we shall give to any mind including the humind.

Metaphysical discovery of extreme importance.

General systems and the science of duality.

General systems is the name of the aborted science we have resurrected without the permission of physicists and its naive realism, which considers all the elements of reality, including also those who cannot be ‘seen with mechanical, spatial instruments’ and quantified with mathematical equations.

Specifically at the death of Einstein, a group of information theorists, gathered in New York, to discuss how to expand the limits of Physics, as a theory of only a single time arrow, lineal motion, and its expansion, entropy, to describe the Universe.

They wanted as Steane said in our first page of this blog to introduce the second arrow of information And so they created a new scientific discipline called alternately Systems Sciences, Theory of Information or Complexity, which would put the ‘world upside down’ so to speak, and explain it all departing not from motion and space, but from time and information, as information is stored in the ‘cycles of clocks’ according to its speed and frequency (so the computer measures its informative power in frequency giga-hertzs).

It was easy to see that such treatment will show a Universe clearly inverse in properties and goals, structures and organisation to the one explained by physicists departing on the concept that only motion matters and only entropy – the arrow of motion and disorder an death – organised the Universe.

Instead, a Universe based on information will be more akin to a living organism, whose aim is to reproduce its information in other parts of space-time, ‘growing and multiplying’, into similar clonic beings, who then organise into larger wholes. So it meant also there would be in the Universe a constant process of creation of ‘scales’ of larger wholes, organised by the communication of information between its parts, from simpler particles into atoms, molecules, organisms, matter states, solar systems, galaxies and networks of galaxies.

An entire new range of sub-disciplines thus appeared, from ’emergence’, the study on how parts become wholes, to ‘cybernetics’, the study on how feed-back generator equations related systems through exchanges of motion and form, entropy and information between two poles:

Spe (entropic space) < > Tƒ (temporal information)

And duality, which closely related to that equation, studied the laws that put together entropy≈motion and information≈form into ‘energetic systems’.

The subject was fascinating and it spurred a lot of attention but soon it withered away for several reasons: physicists were adamantly opposed to ad on a second arrow of ‘time-future’, information, the arrow of biology and life, and as the makers of entropic weapons and machines, their political and economic power was much larger. So information, ‘dimensional form’, was denied and instead a deformed, ‘physical version’ of information called perversely ‘negantropy’, the negation of entropy was established. And when physicists denied information (Shannon), they did it in terms of entropy and motion (as only transmission of information  mattered).

Further on as computers developed, the focus was no longer the understanding of all the forms of temporal information, all the clocks of the Universe, all its biological dimensional forms, all its artistic forms, its topologies, etc. but just mechanical, computerised, digitalise information mattered. So the initial goal of Systems Sciences, to explain the entire Universe as a system of  entropy, information and its energetic combinations, extended through a series of scales of space-time, of parts becoming wholes, who ‘formed’ a true 5th dimension of scalar nature, were forgotten.

50 years passed and we could only think of Systems Sciences and theory of Information (dimensional form), as a failed discipline, which was predated and misused by computer scientists and physicists to ‘model’ with the single digital language of machines a Universe, where the dogma of entropy-only-matters (which further on justified our military society) was an absolute canon, a new religion of power. 

In this site we shall recover the original purpose of the discipline and show that indeed, those earlier insights, on a more complex holistic view of the Universe was possible, turning upside down our view of reality, as informative time DOMINATES space, mechanisms are simple, evolving organisms of metal, and motion only the ‘initial state’ of reality, which informative time cycles bend, reproduce, shape and evolve into organic wholes – whose creation is the true purpose of it all.

And the key to understand it all is indeed to consider that all what exists follows the same laws of in-form-ation, form, which in latin writes ‘morph’ and so we call those common laws derived of all the dimensions of reality, its Ð-isomorphisms…


So now we know what the mind is let us see how it applies to the way science distorts reality and the concepts of time… to elucidate the fundamental question about reality poised by philosophy of science: WHAT IS THE SUBSTANCE AND HOW IT IS CREATED THE UNIVERSE AND ALL ITS PARTS?

And of this, there have always been 3 theories about it, based in the concept that either language creates reality or space-time, the a priori substances of reality generate it all, including languages. We have already dealt with the fallacy of the first two theories. So how the third, space and time, generate reality? Through….

  Dimensional isomorphisms≈laws derived of space and time

So BECAUSE there are 10 dimensions of space and of time, or 5 put together, by considering the properties of those dimensions and its symmetries and interactions we can deduce the properties of reality and all its systems.

In the next graph we see some of those laws which apply with variations to all systems of reality:IN THE GRAPH, the main properties of space-time beings are derived of the ultimate properties of fractal cyclical space-time and its 3±∆st dimensions. We thus talk of space-time laws as Ðisomorphisms.

‘A Ðisomorphism is a property of any T.œ, Time§pace organism, common to all other time§pace beings, as it derives of a ‘foundational property’ of one of the 5St dimensions of T.Œ (Everything Organic)”.

The study of Ðisomorphisms and the correspondence of all events in time and forms in space and organisms of scales with one of the 10 fundamental Dimensions/isomorphisms of reality is the ‘prove’ that relational space-time is the proper philosophy of science of reality.

So as only a 10 Dimensional theory of reality will be able to reflect all those properties – including the syntax and properties of all languages, and not the way around (neither mathematics or words, smaller mind-mirrors will be able to reflect all those properties as the 5s+5t dimensions do – those 10 D will be considered the ‘ultimate substance of reality’.

When we APPLY the scientific method of truth the 3 alternative theories of reality, verbal creationism, mathematical creationism or relational space-time as the substance of reality the response is immediate, since once we have made more explicit how relational space-time is made of 3 ‘simultaneous=present’ dimensions of space-time beings made of |-limbs/fields>Ø-body/waves>O-particles heads, and relative past and two ∆±i future fourth and fifth scalar dimensions of entropic ∆-1 atoms/cells and ∆+@ wholes/singularity minds we can assess if they suffice to explain all what exists, which they do both in space – simultaneous ternary |xO=Ø-beings and in time (with the death-emergence arrows of scalar d=evolutions, defining the limits of a world cycle).

On the other hand to prove the space-time organic theory of the Universe, we just have to prove that all language and forms and events of Nature are caused by the 5S and 5T dimensions of space-time of the Universe, which ad to the 3 usual dimensions of space in Nature, 3 symmetries in time-motion and two more scalar dimensions, we shall now explain in detail.

As the proof that the Universe is made of relational space-time is as simple as to show you all can be deduced from those 5 Dimensions and its ‘isomorphic=equal properties’ in all entities made of them. 

T.œ’s formalism:  5×2 @∆s≈t DISOMORPHIC LAWS of all time§paœrganisms.

The concept of isomorphism is simple: each dimension is self-similar in all beings, so its forms and functions will be similar variations in all beings and by describing the 5 x2 = 10 space-time dimensional isomorphisms, as equal laws and qualm forms deduce of its properties we can explain the Universe and any T.Œ: timespace being.

So for each being on reality we shall observe properties that can be ascribed to those dimensions of space-time and its variations. Each of those dimensions can be seen mentally as a form and/or as a motion (Relativity principle). So a more detailed analysis of the dimensions of beings would be to split them into formal and functional, still and moving, stop and go dimensions/properties.

But perhaps the most remarkable quality of a ðime§paœrganism is its structural symmetries and sub-properties, as a fractal being – meaning that when we study each of those dimensions in abstract T.Œ (the isomorphic laws of all beings) or in a concrete T.œ (a specific organism), as in Physics and group theory, we observe ‘symmetric relationships’ between those properties.

Let us explain ourselves with a linguistic example. Mathematics started as an experimental stience with 5 sub disciplines related to those 5D:

S-geometry; T: number theory>, ∆-nalysis, S≈T algebraic equations, and @-frames of reference in which to express mentally those elements in S≈T pairs.

So the 5 sub disciplines of mathematics as a language mirror mimic those of the 5D Universe, but as it advanced further, we find that each sub-discipline became divided in sub-combined disciplines, which grew in ‘complexity’ by connecting those dimensions; so we got differential geometry, moving geometry=topology, analytic geometry and so on.. 

And this is where complexity indeed kicks in the Universe; as any element which is ‘specialised≈dominant’ in one dimension does however as a ‘whole in itself’ show properties and parts of the other elements. For example your leg is a limb, lineal dominant in the form-functions of the 1st dimension of motion; but as a whole we realise it has 3 S=t kind of parts, the long S-bones to move in line; the T-spherical knees and ankles to improve its dimensional motion, the hip connection to the ∆+1 body-head system; and the flat feet to extract ∆-2 entropy of the electromagnetic world repulsion. 

So the study of a species through its ∆@s≈t elements is truly an unfolding as a fractal of multiple elements, always turning around the 5ST DIMENSIONS of reality.

The fractal generator plus all human languages build an ∆@$≈ð formalism

How we go about describing all this? Obviously as we are all humind monads or future robots, through the languages we know, which as mirrors show the ‘relationships’ between those 5D elements. Verbal languages do it as we ‘speak’. Each does it better with an element.

So mathematics is the best for space and can tell us a lot of all others elements, verbal thought is best for ∆-organic worldcycles of life and death, but analysis as we have seen also talks of it; verbal thought our natural language can then be also considered for all those elements.

But for the whole 5D ∆@s≈t, we need its proper formalism that comes above each language we shall use.

This formalism uses a few simplified logic symbols to describe space-time forms and events in terms of 5D dimensions, departing from the S=T basic symmetries between moving and formal dimensions and its inverted relationships.

For example $pace has inverse properties than ðime (1-3Dimensions). And each language will show it in its own syntax. I.e. mathematical physics measure them with inverse parameters: T=1/ƒ, duration is inverse to frequency. Entropy has inverse directions to mind-order and the verbal language makes a tragedy of death and a beauty of life. Lineal form in space has inverse dimensions to cyclical time and its balance, energy is the petered present state. So art creates with the 3 ages of artistic forms (epic=lineal, beautiful harmony=classic, balanced and baroque, angst).

All languages are thus proper to show the properties of 5D. But each makes it in a specific way for a range of beings. So we need the language of all languages, which is the symbolism of ∆@s≈t.

All this symbolism generates a general theory of 5D, which we call T.Œ, and when applied to each species, it means to study the 10 dimensions of the being, in the best possible way, which is by using the Fractal generator that puts them all together in relationship, establishes its rules of ‘engagement’ through its symbols and then plays with them in different orders and combinations.

For example we can write a series on the 5 Dimensions as follows:  

Γ.œ: ∆ø: S≈T:body-wave =  $pe: limbs/potentials≥≤ Tiƒ:Particle/head>∆+1@<<∆-2 : entropy

Here we explain that a body-wave in the present, ∆ø scale is made of limbs that provide it with motion and head with information, which have a central singularity-mind perceiving the ∆+1 world which will die << into the ∆-2 plane, below cellular scale in an explosion of entropy…

But the human mind is one-dimensional, aristotelian, euclidean (light-based) and so it is for her difficult to follow a Universe in which all parts and dimensions mess with all others, where there are so many combinations of those 5D+5D, s=t dimensions, each of them with so many varieties that the kaleidoscope of many worlds generated by so few elements becomes overwhelming for most people, even if we start with something so simple as S≈T.

So a proper organisation of so much information is needed. And we have chosen to do so not with a limited description of the 10 dimensions, as we must mess them and show all its interrelationships, but with a ‘GENERATIVE’ ‘sentence’ of 10 Isomorphisms, similar laws/elements proper of all ∆@s≈ð beings; which reads (there are a few versions but I will try as I order material of several ‘epochs’, to be more consistent) as follows:

‘Isomorphic ‘Linguistic ‘•Monads’– Γenerate -2Manifold 5-Åctions through -ðernary-ηetworks -Ωging as∑pecies μovingθru 9§cales& |0ƒractaLevelsºf • ∑•Δ…

Initially the sentence filled an entire line of the upper scheme, which words on alphabetic order, alas! the laws of the Universe had to be reduced to the protocol of world press! (: and finally I scraped it – might return in the future… Still it is meaningful for it truly explains from the point of view of the most important elements of reality the 5th dimension of the Mind-wholeness, how a system is generated by a seed of information, or mind how ultimately all realities are created departing from ‘SINGULARITIES’. SO the 10 isomorphisms used in the fourth line to describe all beings are:


0th isomorphism: -@ Mind, which is a linguistic (informative view) Monad (spatial view) will…

FIRST ISOMORPHISM. -Generate… in the TERNARY SYNTAX it uses to perceive, a mirror image of order and action:


2nd isomorphism: 2 manifold symmetries of space-time… where minds combines its space and time dimensions/parameters, from mass and motion to e-motions and thoughts… to act…

Those ‘motions of timespace, S≤≥T, combine the forms of the mind with the flows of space with which the mind exchanges entropy, energy and information communicating with other entities and planes.

5th isomorphism. And the result will be 5 canonical æ, œ, ï, ø, û actions in which by marrying dimensions across scales absorbing or emitting entropy, energy and information in bidimensional extensions of itself the mind moves (accelerations), reproduces (œ), information and communicates (ï), feeding on energy and provoking the entropy of other beings (ø), and evolving informatively with others into social Universals.

∆§calar 9TH 10TH isomorphisms:  Those actions in turn will connect the mind and organisms with other social beings in scales of growth both at cellular and individual level, and make it transit through the different planes of the 4th and 5th scalar dimensions of the beings.



3rd isomorphism: ternary networks And SO THE MIND finally emerges socially from its initial seed into a  superorganism, as its seed of information, reproduces and organises itself ’emerging’ as a ternary network-system able to produce those actions and motions. So we can study its inner structure, in its relative ∆-1≥∆networks and its inner ternary symmetries, represented in its generator.

6th isomorphism: Species. And the variations of order and primacy of those networks will give birth to the duality of gender and the 6 main topological subspecies of any space-time organism.

So departing from a mind species, languages unfolds through its isomorphic generators as mirrors of reverse order, into bidimensional actions, which reproduce the mind into a super organism that emerges in present from its previous ‘life’ at ∆-1 as a seed of information, phetus and offspring.


Since actions gather in networks, follow then a world cycle of growing information through 3 ages, due to the fact that the mind is still and its actions tend to formal excesses to cater the still mind. So it is unavoidable that any seed of information will by the essence of what it is make too many wrinkles and circles as it ages, describing its zero sum world cycle.

And so we describe again in time how those ternary Networks, its universal constants and physiological functions d=evolve in 3 ±2 canonical ages, in present time, the young age of spatial motion, the mature age of reproduction and the third age of information, to which we shall add the ‘2 limiting borders’ of conception and death (∆±1 ages) and the two ‘outer regions’ of emergence from conception to birth (palingenesis) and the ∆-1 entropic decay into oblivion (the ±2 ages happening in the past and future relative ∆±i regions).

So the result is a worldcycle of which there are ∞ of them, as time is motion the substance of reality that never stops – the 8th isomorphism.

We have now ALL the elements to explore further the main equations of mathematical physics, the three arrows of time, and the Metric of the fifth dimension, which we can resume in a specific case of the Generator equation:

Past-entropy OPERANDI Future-Information = Present-energy.

IT might seem very little but really nothing else except iterations and variations on the same theme is required to account for ‘all’, but obviously this writer is NOT the UNIVERSE, JUST A MIND-mirror, better focused than other humans, which if enlightened by his mirror might in the future take this bare bone seed of GST-information to its completion.

In that regard, the key concept of the entire GST structure of ‘orGanic Space-Time beings’, all of them following the laws of General Systems Theory, formalised by the non-Ælgebra of the fractal Generator of Space-Time, is the concept of isomorphism or ‘homology’ between the laws of all scales of nature, based in the fact that all beings are made of space-time, so their laws are NOT analogic, but HOMOLOGIC, born of the same substance. And this is a huge change of paradigm, as scientists lacking a primary substance (space and time), once they abandoned ‘Leibniz’s relational space-time theory’, have always been at pains to explain WHY THERE ARE SO MANY similarities in nature. Consider the classic case:

Space-time makes analogies between forms and functions, homologies.

In the graph, we see ‘homology’ (left: all wings come from biological genetic limbs homologous in all life beings) vs. Analogy (planes do have wings but of different substance metal).

Fact is though that in the Universe at large ultimately even the wings of planes are HOMOLOGOUS as they are based in the topological ‘flat’, ‘lineal’ structure of entropic limb/fields systems that move beings, as the line is the SHORTEST distance between two points, and we are all made of space and time, hence the flat plane and flat wing o the bat or bird ARE homologous derived from the spatial element of both systems.

This is the justification of the isomorphic method: all the similar properties of all the species of the Universe can be derived from the 4-5 elements of reality, its scales, its spatial entropy, temporal information (and space-time energy) arrows=actions and its singularity minds. And so we shall define applying the dualities and ternary differentiations that further sub-divide those structural elements isomorphic, similar laws for all systems of nature (THIRD LINE) WHICH we will then apply to every system of reality (fourth line) to extract all its laws.

Let us put a rather ‘extreme’ example, connected to our division of all systems in three parts – the way energy is shared by them – relating the seemingly completely different systems of the lower scale of quantum physics, (which ‘amateur’ philosophers of science, aka physicists consider special), the human physical scale of thermodynamics, the biological scale of organisms, and the social scale of human beings with its ternary ‘informative ruling classes’ which provide financial and verbal legal information to control reproductive, working people, above an entropic mother-earth they devastate by not respecting those goals of balance.

It is called the viral theorem that defines the proportions of energy used by the three parts of any system.

The law is concerned’ with the ‘equilibrium states’ between the three symbiotic elements of the supœrganism, and roughly goes as this:

– The system is a ternary body/wave-particle/head-limb/field system whereas EITHER the limbs or the body ‘feeds’ on entropic motion or stored energy and then delivers it to the three parts including the heads.

And it does so either in a ternary equipartition between the three elements or a 2 to 1 equipartition where the body and limbs take two (40%) and the head 1 (20%), as the informative system of lesser motion; and within the head, the mind ‘nucleus’ 1/1oth.

But to find this viral law in different systems, we have to ‘translate’ the ‘analogous’ jargons of each science to the ‘homologous’ jargon of GST, and this of course, is where human scholars cringe as their egotist view of reality will always be self-centred in his ‘unique discipline’ (: Never mind the universe goes his own way.

 So we have the viral theorem expressed in terms of position/potential energy (Tƒ) and kinetic  energy (Se) all over physics; BOTH in the thermodynamic scale where it was first proved by Rudolf Clausius:

Ke = 1/2 ∑ V x r (potential energy x particles).

And in the quantum scale – even if quantum physicists pretend against Einstein’s dictum that they are different from thermodynamical systems:

Human systems.

Does this law rule also human metabolic systems?

Indeed; the brain uses more energy than any other human organ, accounting for up to 20 percent of the body’s total haul and the rest is share by limbs and body at different times of the day.

Further on the brain uses its energy in equipartition, as 1/3rd goes for the brain and the rest is used to fire the neurons that connect the brain with the whole system: so another ±1/3rd goes to the body and ±1/3rd to the limbs… 

There is finally a ‘third’ possibility for equipartitions, in which the ‘head-particle’ of the system gets only 10% of the energy in total terms, but 10 times more energy for each cellular element, when we isolate in Tƒ the pure mind component the ‘singularity’ of the tetraktys; that is the inner workings of the mind-knot of communication of all the other sub-systems. So we find the brain neurons, the ultimate inner mind, spend 10 times on average more energy than a normal body cell.

Social systems.

Do we have a similar law in social systems? Oh, yes, we do, but the theme is even more polemic, because of the way the Universe enforces its laws by extinguishing those systems who do not accept the justice and efficiency of its isomorphisms. 

So in the middle ages the church who was the mind of the subconscious collective european civilisation got 10% of the energy of the peasants in the so called ‘diezmo’ or tax on the revenues of the other two elements (the warrior aristocrats and peasants). But when it got greedy wanting more of it, there was a Lutheran r=evolution against the loss of efficiency of a system where the head gets more energy that it needs – being money the energy of the reproductive-economic-body system of social supœrganisms.

Needless to say today when stock-rats, owners of corporations who print money for free in stock-markets count their ‘tenth percent’ turns out to be around 99% of the wealth o society, which shows our supœrganisms of history are deeply corrupted and will not last, as there will be r=evolutions, wars and holocausts to restore the balance or extinguish the species and elites of bankers and politicos who are suffocating the body of workers.

Equipartition laws are thus fundamental structural laws of ternary and dual nature, which establish the harmonious working together of the 3 ‘GENERATOR’ subsystems of any entity of the Universe, and as such are part of the ‘core’ equations of GST. But as always in this blog with quantitative methods, we shall not stress them as we are more interested in informative, qualitative isomorphisms.

The metaphysical view…

Minds in any case show on those statistics to ‘punch’ much more than their average ‘weight/size’ seems to preclude as they rule the system and create it. And so ultimately we can talk of a Universe born of a single mind-thought, the isomorphic equal laws of the fractal Universe.

And since we have said, the mind is the mirror that efficiently reduces the information to its pure seed of perfect forms; we imagine creation in a first infinite past googleon of time, was the product of an i-logic mathematical mind, which shrunk and cleaned the Universe of its worst experiences, reducing it to the perfect form of the mathematical, i-logic, organic game we describe in our posts on mind languages.

And so in mystical terms we could say that the isomorphisms of Nature, are the proof that we are all made to the image and likeness of the creator, the programind of the Universe: God ≈ Γ•∆, which is other form to write the four elements of reality, the Γst generator of the three arrows≈actions of time, the • mind and the ∆-scales: Gamma-0-Delta, God.. Γ•∆

And so we close the isomorphisms that describe any being, within the cycle between mirror, creation, reproduction, imprinting of a perfect seed, which will be reborn after devolution, and show how this process accounts for it all, from the simplest seed of form – a photon, to the most complex wholeness, the mind of God. And then in the final line we shall use those isomorphisms to explain each and every form that matters on existence, between the ∆º±4 scales and planes of God we do perceive.

But the best way to see the isomorphisms of the Universe is referring them all to the fundamental particle of reality the supœrganism. And so we can relate the isomorphisms to the three ±∆ physiological networks that related outward to the world through the senses, and inwards, to the cells/atoms/citizens through the distributing networks of entropy, energy and information of the being.


Nature’s Rashomon effect is born of the 5 Disomorphic, ∆@s≈t components of all space-time systems, which provide 4 views to make a mind mapping (@); the spatial, temporal, scalar and spacetime view.

Rashomon effect on mathematical descriptions of gravitation: EFE’s formal-space view; Newton’s temporal-moving view; Poisson’s Potential ∆-1 view; Lagrangian, ∆+1 @ction view and Hamiltonian, S≈t view…

You have in that sense to get accustomed to consider at least 4 views for each reality or event, to at least a get a minimal truth of the being, as the kaleidoscopic method of truth (max. truth: max. linguistic perspectives on the event) requires. As in the masterpiece of Japanese film making, the Universe and its truths are under the Rashomon effect: only the four versions allow us to know the whole truth of the event.

In the graph, we see the four different formalisms of gravitation all of them a partial truth of the event seen from the 4 essential ∆•st perspectives. This is thus the first law of GST, the method of truth and epistemology of ∆ST BEINGS.

It is the essential tool to reorder the astounding quantity of trees in the forest of human one-dimensional truths, theories and equations on reality, where each scholar ‘kills for his theory’.

But the total truth is only in the event itself – as Rashomon insists leaving some room for doubt and interpretations.

Gravitation 4 ∆•st ‘formalism’.

While Einstein’s equation and similar ones of Poison and Newton, define how ‘time curves space’ into masses sunk inwards towards a singularity-point. The outer membrane – the magnetic field or electron, or curved space-time thus encircles a vital space, always self-centred into an attractive≈in-formative p.o.v.

And while physicists are never concerned with the why of those structures, only with the measure of its forms and motions and the extraction of mathematical laws that could describe them, a philosopher of science must have a wider logical point of view, extracting as we shall do, from the equations of science, the ‘underlying’ ∆ºst-ructures which will reveal its ultimate whys similar=isomorphic to those of all other st-beings.

NOW, we can bring about as we are dealing with minds, with the ‘epistemological meaning of knowledge’ which we so often will bring to this blog: knowledge is mind, linguistic knowledge using different linguistic mirrors to see a system; and by the same reason, knowledge in ‘ceteris paribus’ partial analysis gives often birth to multiple similar theories that depart from one of the four elements of reality, ∆•ST.

So we shall find multiple equations which seem different theories but explain all the points of view and perspectives of the being, adding to the total truth of the being. So if we were to consider the previous two examples, we shall see multiple theories, all of them working, as they represent different povs. In the next graph we see the case of gravitation with four relative models, T-NEWTON (time vortex), S-poison (potential gradient), ST-Hamilton (energy), ∆•- Einstein (gravitational ∆º scale and paradoxes of the observer).

The same happens with almost EVERY reality, which is NOT only multidimensional, multifunctional but also can be perceived from multidimensional, multifunctional beings.

Consider for example, the question of the magnetic field, which follows an unending debate on his ‘origin’, ’cause’ and ‘why there are no monopoles’.

We have offered the T-view: magnetic fields have ‘vorticity’, enclosed the vital space of charges and act as its membrane.

But magnetic fields do have multi functionality. So when we consider ∆,the magnetic field is the key element to evolve socially groups of charges, as in quantum theory where it plays the four number that codes the social evolution of atomic groups. 

The S-patial view then would study the simultaneity and ways in which a magnetic field structures physical superorganisms.

And each of those fields will be as ginormous as all the physical system that use magnetic fields in their functions of ‘order’, ‘energy storing’, information storing/communication, etc. etc.

Which brings us finally to the •mind view, also unavoidable, as the observer is always a mind talking a linguistic view. And this is provided by Einstein’s special relativity theory of magnetism and the paradoxes of ‘Galilean relativity’ (all things move and do not move at the same time).

So the mind view shows how an electric field in one inertial frame of reference looks in different reference frame moving with respect to the first.

And this is how the • view understands any type of field created by moving sources. Since the same sources can be seen at rest from other pov.

In the magnetic case, the charge sources that create the field are at rest with respect to one of the reference frames. Given the electric field in the frame where the sources are at rest, one can ask: what is the electric field in some other frame? Here is the conundrum: in a frame in which we do NOT see the charges moving, the magnetic field will NOT exist, as it is created by moving charges.  So an observer at rest with respect to a system of static, free charges will see no magnetic field. However, a moving observer looking at the same set of charges does perceive a current, and thus a magnetic field. That is, the magnetic field is simply the electric field, as seen in a moving coordinate system.

What is then the truth? All of them together. For the outer observer the magnetic field depends on the way it comes closer to the charge-singularity, the ‘real thing’. But this does not invalidate the organic perspective: the field ‘appears’ as soon as the ‘other being’, the observer MOVES in relationship to the charge. Think now in an homology on the biological or social scale: an electric fence around a lion zoo, might only ‘start up’ when a threshold of motion-force is applied to it, to protect from aggressions. The defensive nature of the field that protects the charge does then appear only when the charge moves into unknown territory or other charge moves towards it.

Nothing then seemingly more remote than the pure idealist, ‘hilbertian’ expression of special relativity where the ‘observer creates the field’ vs. the organic, real perspective of the function of the field. Both are in fact valid views as the multiple kaleidoscopic views of any system are.

But the Hilbert view about mathematics as an idealist language created by the human mind, which was the only language of the Universe, shared by God has imposed as the ‘primary truth’, any mathematical equation, even if it does not have experimental evidence behind it.

This was the few of Bohr on the Universe, and today the view of string theorists and physicists like Hawking inventing imaginary black holes.

And while this view has been ‘great’ for the mathematical development of physics by serious people who did take epistemology, experimental evidence and philosophy of science seriously (Einstein would acknowledge without an idealist view not concerned with substance he wouldn’t have written relativity) it has introduced among the ‘mass of physicists’, which are naturally more mediocre, and less stringent with truth, absurd concepts of nebulous pseudo-religious nature on the discipline, where today ALL GOES as long as you can model it with a computer in digital numbers – so linguistic fictions keep coming but people believe them because they are written in numbers as they used to believe anything written in images, in the earlier age of films.

Consider for example, the previous case of the magnetic field. I used to ask physicists about it, and most adamantly will affirm that indeed magnetic fields are ‘an effect’ of relativity and the mind’s relative motion, NOT the other way around, being relativity a paradox of the mind’s perception of motion.

Then I would ask them… So the magnetic field in light is also an effect of our relative motion? Silence. Since being symmetric to the electric field to deny them would mean to deny electric fields, and hence also light and undone what God did; and ‘God created light’, but alas! we know physicists are above heavens and earth (: So Alexander Pope at the death of Newton wrote: ‘And God created Newton’. So we can maybe eliminate also light from the equation? Another correction of Mr. Einstein. God should be taking notes. 

So it is obvious – but most physicists won’t admit it – that magnetic fields ARE real, AND IT IS the mind’s paradoxes on motion which distorts their view.

 The same kind of behaviour happened when I confronted in my youth physicists at columbia U. with the big-bang errors and the pilot wave vs. Copenhagen interpretations.

It didn’t matter experimental evidence anymore, and that has been the case since Hilbert for most physicists, who did make the amateurish jump into philosophy of science, with that pedestrian concept: Whatever you can write in maths is real. ONLY Einstein quipped, ‘I know when maths are truth but not real’. As languages are inflationary forms of information, fast in transmission,  smaller in size, underlying the process of creation but still restricted to the primary substances space and time, and its true properties:

In the graph, the main scales of 5D as observed from the perspective of the human mind. Formally we unify them as ‘broken space-time beings, which exist as motions in the fifth dimension’, defined by a topo-bio-logical  ‘fractal generator’, Γ±∆•, whereas Γ is a ternary feed-back generator equation that defines any space-time being: $p<limbs/fields>ST<body-waves>ðƒ(heads-particles), ∆i±1, its scales, and • the singularity point that ‘frames it’.

So we can unify all theories within the larger pov of the fractal generator and vice versa – it is ALSO possible to ad on all those perspectives from different scales and distorted s, st, t, povs to obtain a more complex view of the being or event.

In the graph, the Universe is a ‘fractal of space-time’ that re≈produces in/form/ation; as such it has both physical forms (meaning larger ones) and spiritual forms (meaning smaller parts with more volume of information) – hence the importance we shall ascribe to minds and languages in their description, as a priori elements which mirror in there packed dense information the properties of larger simpler physical systems, establishing a constant dialog between them which modify each other.

Languages are then mirrors of reality and to polish and evolve them is also an a priori condition to get a better ‘picture’.

IN THAT SENSE, the immediate example of the Rashomon effect is the ternary±i syntax of languages, which reflect the 3±i dimension of the Universe.

For example, mathematics evolved into its capacity to mirror dimensions of space and ages of time and scales of the fifth dimension by developing parallel disciplines.

So there has been an evolution of mathematics in the human mind and now in the metal-mind that shows a clear direction to enlarge mathematics as a mind-mirror to fulfil all kind of atomic structures.

But mathematics is a human and computer digital language, with some bias from our ∆º-mind scale. Clearly it lacks detail as a biological, ∆±1 language. So we must believe mathematics is the mind of perhaps a black hole/quark, ultimate nuclei of density of the astrophysical scales, in its most perfect digital forms.

Mathematical disciplines.

This said we will separate mathematics in ∆st major fields:

•: ¬Ålgebra which studies timespace actions, and tends to concentrate in a single plane through its polynomial, social, decametric scales.

∆: ∆nalysis which studies §ocial scales of numbers, and corresponds closely to the process of growth between scales.

St: Γeometry of space and its modern form with motion ðopology which deals closely with cyclical ðime-space curvatures & symmetries.

All the branches, which mixes the topological and algebraic approaches; such as probability (time view) and statistics (space view) analytic geometry and so on.
So if we were to define i-logic mathematics we would say that it is composed of Non-Aristotelian ∆lgebra and Non-Euclidean STopology; the first including analysis the second bidimensional and static geometry. And the natural evolution of the discipline correspond to the combination of them all to express ∆st whole processes.

•: cracking the code of mathematical… physics.

In that sense we can now answer the questions physicists cannot because for all their praise of mathematical languages as the only languages of god, they are not breaking its code, which will be the true advance of their discipline.

Indeed the true r=evolution achieved by GST in an ongoing process at this point – I often remember Planck’s quote to ‘keep going’: ‘a new theory is born in a single point… the mind of the researcher – is the cracking of the experimental, general laws of mathematics, with application to all systems of Nature.

Contrary to belief, and as it happens in most human endeavours, our mathematical world is a ‘construct’, which humans ascribe to themselves as supposed geniuses, who ‘know what to do’. Reality though is more messy less egotist, and man often is just an homunculus manipulating by empirical thought and trial and error, reality, and in the case of languages, playing with its syntactic elements without much understanding of its semantics.

Compare then present mathematics with ‘Tachism’, the name given to abstract painting, which has its own structure and formal and colour coding, the underlying laws that make the syntax of abstract painting harmonious (actually as it has been uncovered studying Pollock’s with a fractal structure of growing scales of self-organisation and ternary harmonies of colours, themes those treated in our section on artistic languages).

Well, tatchism is all about syntax, so semantics don’t matter. Bur very few will affirm that it is better than figurative painting, where we can recognise ‘reality’ transformed by the style of the painter. So goes from ‘abstract mathematics’ as it is today ruled by the axiomatic method: it is only based in syntax because since the idealist Hilbert’s school  decided that maths were invented by the brain, reference to reality no longer matter. The titanic struggle of earlier mathematicians from Pythagoras to Lobachevsky to ground maths on reality no longer matter.

WE SHALL thus study maths both as a language mirror of the Universe which went through three ages, and it is today in its third formal, inward, ‘detached’ from reality stage, and its post-human, after-death translation into computerised models for the ‘new mind-species’ of digital thought (computers, robots, cybernetic systems AI).

Instead of following that path, banned for ethic,  survival reasons, which ARE the body language that should dominate humanity – AI will kill man is NOT sci-fi, but evolution and so a humind a bit more intelligent and less egotistic would not evolve computers further – we won’t write here a single AI (algorithm of Information the real meaning of artificial intelligence, a different mind species to that of man) but rather complete the full cycle that started with Pythagoras and his insights on the experimental nature of maths, reflecting the whole world, by connecting back maths and reality as the language that better describes the logic of time sequences with numbers and algebra, and the structures of space, with fractal points and topology.

We have already done a bit of that as you will realise we have been grounding topology into space with far more meaning and experimental quality – no more no less than the essential form of the Universe; 5D scaling with the postulates of geometry that create scalar spaces; but we have not tackled much of algebraic functions, the true language of sequential time, and integral/derivative calculus, the language of 5D scales.

Two examples of those disciplines answering questions never clarified, ONE ABOUT time and the other about scales:

ð: Why Fourier transforms are all pervading? Answer, they map out the discontinuous frequencies of the actions=arrows of time, a system performs to survive as it goes on switching between high frequencies acts of perception (one second each), of feeding (three a day), reproducing (once a year) and so on…  And so we can truly represent all the actions of a system with Fourier transforms, and put them together into a ‘continuous’ wave that represents the entire world cycle of the system.

∆: Why derivatives are all pervading in physics? Answer: they describe processes that emerge in a different scale of the fifth dimension. So all motions and worldcycles can be alternatively represented with derivatives, even those more extreme processes of ‘death-entropy’ (second derivatives) and its inverse arrows of time with integrals.

So what we will do is a complete ‘cracking’ of the code of maths, in the way Pythagoras was tried, all mathematicians thought off till the idealist formal third age of maths (Cantor, Hillbert) ended with it.

And this will be of course the last posts we shall do, the jewel of the crown, likely when my many sicknesses put me on caducity date.

why? Basically I have entered my third age and given the sorrowful state of this world, and the humind’s egotism and childish selfie nature so oppose to the laws o the organic Universe, and the trajectory of my life, both intellectual and as an activist for human causes, which the system systematically ignores, I have given up on the power of science to transform for the better our world. So I prefer to remain an autist.

And so as I know we live in the digital age of machines over man, physicists over philosophers,  maths over all other languages that ‘also matter’; as long as i don’t pour my 30 years of research on mathematical physics and its foundations and throw in my 30 hand written notebooks translating what I considered in my youth the best works on the subject ‘ever’ (Landau’s soviet era 11 books on physics at a professional level, aleksandrov’s 3  books on maths at layman level), the world will completely ignore this blog, and I will be able ‘at last’ to exit mundi in my retirement NO longer in connection with degraded mankind, but with the TAO-mind of the Universe, which makes me happy.

So yes, this blog is written for myself. It is my mantra. Others give conferences, teach, write books. I don’t. I like to contemplate the tao, the logic mind of the Universe, and I like to mirror it on my mind. And this blog is just about the 30 years ongoing dialog I have with Nature, NOT with man. That was the blog on social sciences (www.economicstruth.com) and my blog on anti-nuclear activism (cerntruth.com), and both just threw me to the wolves… And didn’t achieve anything.

This blog for me has a different function: to liberate me from any other form of communication with humans; to conserve at least the bare bones of those 30 years of research, to keep my ailing brain from a vegetative state – a mental exercise; and to bring me some small moments of bliss, meditating on those laws.

So you know, one day suddenly 30 notebooks at professional level r=evolving the entire corpus of mathematical Physics, as nobody has ever done since Einstein, will appear, and you will know the blog is complete…  the author was not a crackpot but a forgotten genius, which is no longer among us. And i you take a sabbatical year to read through and understand you will see through the fog the extraordinary perfection of the ∞ immortal Universe, and the infinitesimal value of us – homunculus of little thought.

And so now, FINALLY! if anyone is still reading (:, we can deal with the minor question of the proper models of physics to describe the larger scales of reality, the whole Universe, which paradoxically has no more information in its infinitely slow, infinitely large scale than the smallest mind-point that perceives it.

As those models are dual – there is the Universe of ‘physics’ and the physicists’ minds that observe it, and the mind distorts the view through their egotist perspective, we will have, sorry folks, to debunk a few idols of the Baconian tribes of physicists, because their mind mirrors are not making justice to the beauty, complexity and perfection of the whole.

It will of course beNOT the 30 notebooks… just a little teaser which encodes more meaning that all what physicists did since the last great r=evolution of the discipline occur… 100 years ago. And it will be filled as most of the blog with too much verbosity and bulshit (: oink, oink

Such simple, deep insight on the nature of everything came to my mind 30 years ago out of the experience of life, of looking as Leonardo put it, into the book of Nature, with new ‘eyes’: ‘saper vedere’.  The intimate experience of feeling part of that whole, knowing how to decode the forms and functions of nature, finding the ‘will of reproduction’ and self-organisation in every part of it, is difficult to express, as it has always been more of an intuition of mystical nature than a scientific certitude.   But we, humans, are inside that fractal, made to its image and likeness, acting on it, trying to reproduce, ‘grow and multiply’ as everything else, with little time for a mere ‘contemplation of Nature’, as that is not the purpose for which we are built.

And that poises a problem of ‘self-realisation, since we are both, doing exactly what all other systems do – trying to reproduce our genes, ideas, instruments, social forms, within a structured informative fractal super organism, our civilisation  but at the same time we want to be special, different from all other beings -NOT subject to those ‘higher laws’ – free and above the rules of the game.

And for that reason man has such a difficult time understanding reality and the game we play within it, as it is – it is not a question of intelligence but of attitude; we are like Prometheus subconsciously hating all Gods, whose program we refuse to ‘see’. Hence the success of theories, which have nothing to do with reality, where humans are the centre of it all, either religions or pseudo-scientific religions where we are the only intelligent, informative being that matters (physicists’ big-bang creationism, where man understands it all, or theories where motion not form – entropy not information is the meaning of it all). All those theories try to impose truth with different forms of ‘epistemological, pedantic dogma’, which go from the ‘believers’ ceremonies’ of religion, to the axiomatic logic positivism of ‘scientific truths’, full of traps where the disguised wishful thinking of our anthropomorphism sneaks in.

This a priori attitude of humans, which so much dislike models of reality where they are not unique, is difficult to confront when one wishes to communicate – ‘reproduce’ – the information he has acquired about the equal nature of it all, ‘fulfilling’ his own program as a ”reproductive fractal of information’, specially in our dominant, anthropomorphic culture of ‘exceptionalist humans’, which will always ‘buy first’, a theory that makes them feel important. It is just a question of time to fully realise that ego, happiness and ‘praxis’ matters far more than truth; and so the sage has little value to society.  So the few homo ‘sapiens’ who have realized of the perennial philosophy of reality, after the initial enthusiasm and attempt to communicate ‘amore gratis’, have tended to withdraw, recognising the ‘human subjective view’ dominates the species.

Indeed, humans do not want to know rationally but they neither want to recognise they don’t. The result are the faulty methods of logic proper of both science and religion, full of self-evident truths absolutely false, and experimental facts, absolutely shallow; all of it ‘greased’ by the absurd concept that there is chaos, freedom and choice. Just because we are unable to grasp the astounding order of its organic laws. And become depressed when knowing we are not special but just a microscopic undistinguishable reality. 

This i cannot help it as unfortunately I am talking to ‘humans’, which will always push more subjective ‘self-centred’ opinions as truths.

But if some truly exceptional human which has the seed of prometheus in his complete rebellion against the Gods, wishes to reflect upon himself,  ‘before time’, and does stumble upon this blog, he is welcome in the very unlikely case he can stand this ‘foreword’ (: to go ahead and extract the essence of it all, the ultimate seed of form. I doubt it will be more than a dozen or so people in my lifespan. After all I am the ‘error’ – the program doesn’t expect you to be inside of it and outside judging it. Because indeed, we are going to judge all Gods, and condemn them for having created us, so below the mark of awareness and survival; so above the maximal allowed to egolatry and imagination.


Ƽst: the four elements of reality come all from time cycles.

We can then write a simple Space-time equation which will represent all beings of reality:

Γœ:  Spe (external, entropic membrane) < St(vital space) > Tiƒ (singularity).

We shall call each of those Generator-Mind-supœrganisms, a ‘Γ.œ’, a temporal, organic system and so define the Universe, as the Organic theory of everything – a sum of space-time beings.


The fundamental particle is a block of time playing a world cycle of existence in 10 dimensions, and as such we can see it fluctuating in three scales of the ∆-Universe, through three topologies of time-space, going through three ages, magic sum of the constant actions of exchange of entropy and information it performs with other points through all those scales.

In the graph we see the 10 dimensions of the galaxy, three of space, three of time, three of scales, and a fourth elements which perceives the whole or mind, both from its internal and external point of view.

So we are going first to explain you in more detail, what we just have proved – that time cycles are everything; and the other three elements of reality, Fractal Space,§, its Scales of size, ∆, and the mind-languages, º, which stop them into still reduced mappings of reality, derive from it. 

  • §: Since fractal space is the inner space enclosed by a cycle that breaks reality into an outside and inner region (Jordan, first topological postulate)…
  • ∆: Scales of size are ‘accelerated regions of faster time cycles that shrink, reality as they convert ‘distance space into faster motion’ (paradox of galileo).

And minds are ‘still, reduced mappings’ of time cycles that ‘expel motion’ and dimensions of form to fit into the mind (so our mind sees bidimensional holographic planes, taking away three dimensions, that of scales – we do not see atoms – that of motion – we do not see the earth moving, and that of depth, we do not see the third dimension but create it with a ‘holographic like’ superposition of two bidimensional planes, which is what each eye sees separately. So we write a simple equation for the mind:

O-mind (infinitesimal still mapping)  x ∞ Universe of time cycles = Relative linguistic world.

Let us then explore this ‘holographic principle of the mind’ in more detail.

Languages command reality and so departing from our simplest form of space and time (light space-time) through its 3D coordinates, let us ‘see’ reality:

In the graph, the first arrow of our space-time is the arrow-wave of communication between electronic minds through light photons, carring energy and information through present waves.

Indeed an entire other range of phenomena are not lineal but determined by its inverse geometry, of the vortex-particle, future cyclical time states:

It is of the interaction of those two primary forms over a wider ‘invisible’, hence purely geometric ideal world of higher entropy and information where our description of the Universe with mathematics starts; hence it does so in geometry. But as it has time motion, and those time motions can be of three arrows:In the graph, the third dissolutive arrow of ‘expansive past’, which added to the implosive future of vortices and the ‘iterative present’ of waves (above graphs), give us the three basic forms with which to play through the infinite scales:

In the graph we can see three different events as combination of two relative past-future arrows, giving birth to an entropic explosion in the present plane, A repetitive wave moving towards the future, and an implosive cone self-centred in a particle, with two states, ‘inwards and forwards. The three space-time fluxes are thus canonical as the 3 states of time-spaces:

A philosophy of stience by force must tackle the seemingly superior nature of mathematics as experimental language able to reflect so many worlds of so many sizes, which merely means mathematics must be a Max. i (±1) language of maximal extension in the scales of the fifth dimension, an ∆±i>3, which are the scales in which it seemingly acts:

In the graph, as topology is used for all scales, ðopological properties must come from the most general elements of reality, which are space an time itself, ‘form’ and ‘motion’, which defines together the 3 topological spacetime forms of all Organic systems in the cosmos.

In it mathematics might be the iterative program of all ¹º10-planes, if the similarity of repetition of its most clear ‘view’, the galaxy-atom can be replicated every 10 of them by mathematical methods.

Such Mathematical ∑∆¡-language, will then be similar to the language of ∑•∆∞.

The time arrow of motion, v=s/t is ONLY one dimension of time.

In that sense, before the big bang and entropy philosophy, physics was defined as the science of motion, and was not the philosophy of reality, and the great geniuses of the change of century, Einstein and Planck agreed, because that is what it is. There are though as we shall see 5 dimensions of timespace and it is ludicrous to try to explain it all with a single one, but that is what physicists came up with – even strangling themselves from proper interpretations of their own data as we just showed, because of their stubborn fear to reject their dogma – on my view, after so many conversations with them, because their unbalanced mind, so dexterous with maths, so poor with verbal conceptualisation – even Einstein seems to have taken his time to talk ‘cold soup’ (: We must stress this because of their ‘childish’ desire to be the high popes after they came up with the big-bang/entropy philosophy and the world gave them that title. Let us then give them what they deserve, the astounding detail of its measures of time loco-motions; no more no less, the 4th dimension of time, entropy, locomotion; but deny them their bullying around of all other disciplines with their simplex view of time; because evolution is time but evolves information, social love is time but evolves parts into wholes; and cyclical clocks are time; but they add a height dimension of perceptive form, and so on. 

If they stuck to their guns I wouldn’t quip so much. I don’t say anything against biologists – they know they study time-information and don’t bully physicists on locomotion. The job of a philosopher of science though is to put them all together and that is what we shall do.

So I agree , that ‘two things I hold infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of human (egos)’ Einstein… Quip intended since it is the ego- the need to keep their position of high priests with their poor tools of 4D-entropy – what make physicists ‘twist’ all the growing proofs of an eternal universe of dynamic balances with ever more complex ‘epicycles’ as it happened when THE EARTH had to be also in the centre and the High popes of the vatican denied it with complex Ptolemaic drawings as ad ons to their orbits (today, the sacred cows of entropy, the big-bang and only a 4D continuous space-time with the c-limit of transmission of information are all over the place; so we cannot accept the obvious existence of a lower plane of faster speeds according to 5D where the quantum potential of entanglement exists, we cannot accept the astounding number of astronomical proofs that black holes do eject matter at faster than c-speed; the obvious ‘observer paradox’ on the limits of the universe, which are only those of the death of light that we use to perceive it, and finally relaxes into dark entropy; the growing fact that many objects are older than the big-bang, etc. etc. – we have an entire post on all those proofs, but as many sound astrophysicists since Hoyle have tried with more prestige than me and become outcast of the religion – I won’t insist – all what I want you to understand is that if would be foolish to ‘stop reading’ perhaps the biggest r=evolution on our understanding of the whys of ‘existence’ since Darwin –  a concept much wider than the ‘picture’ of the Universe in a single plane, brought about in this blog, because at first sight contradicts some dogmas of the ego paradox of physical science – which obviously will be also enlightened as we have done, just by correcting the so ‘evident’ errors of a single entropic arrow and a single plane in the Universe.

But as I said I give up on physicists – not though on scientists – since many since Hoyle and Einstein have tried. Even Wilson for a while tried to convince their peers that he was measuring the local galactic radiation and the steady state is more satisfying. Dissidents are all scolded and then ‘reaccepted after penitence’. But as a philosopher of science I hold my discipline ABOVE physics, as we study ALL the scales and ALL the languages and ALL the ‘sensations’ and properties of reality.

INDEED, AS WE SHALL soon prove to you, the sentient Universe can also be proved because precisely as we know gravitation exist but we don’t perceive it, the aforementioned 5 drives of life, which particles display, motion, gauging information, reproduction, feeding on energy and social evolution, WILL BE CONSIDERED the external proof that there is a will of survival in any system where departing from a region, point or singularity those actions are performed by an entity – or at least the 3 simplex ones, motion, gauging information and energy feeding without which a whole does NOT exist.

And I do have yet to receive a single rational respond to why then particles are NOT the basis of life, and hence the entire Universe is alive and sentient.

It doesn’t though matter how you approach with data and proofs the obvious – it is like attacking the dogmas of abrahamic religions – the humind ego MUST BE more IMPORTANT, above heavens and Earth and all agree. It then becomes a matter of peers to uphold the particular way in which your ego paradox upholds your model right, from string theorists, to capitalist economics, to national history – it is all emotional and personal for the physicist, the mathematician, the banker or the tribe… to uphold its model as superior proving he knows better in his ‘contract’ with the higher truth of its particular god-like language (maths, money), group (tribe, peers),…

The ego is always behind THE ERRORS spotted in most humind sciences with the possible exception of biology, which being about life  is quite objective in its praise of its complexity – pending yet the acceptance of fractal eusocial evolution of parts into organic wholes, also product of our selfie-ego which does NOT want to reduce the important of the individual.

On my view the unassailable cosmic big-bang is also ego, because it is very nice to think we know everything about space and time, the beginning and the end, because its so simple compared to us, the only intelligence that can find a lineal equation, V=hod (see the similarity with ‘God) and moving it back in time, against any ‘experimental proof’  (since it does NOT include the vortices of galaxies, we repeat that are NOT EXPANDING but contracting; and NO equation is infinite in time but all have a cut-off, as if you run your life backwards is NOT immortal but has a seed in a lower scale) or epistemology (AS LINES and lineal equations are parts of curves in the pan geometry of non-euclidean reality, as Lobachevski proved, so when you see fro a longer scale the flat earth is cyclical)  as we please… till the 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 second.

It makes physicists to look as creationist priests of the wor(l)d were: repeaters of truths; who don’t take it lightly when you point out all the contradictions. Or as when you explain a banker that making the meaning of economics just to print digital numbers as money without any social policy, as if it was just all about printing digital inflationary money and keep it, or when you tell a nationalist the Schopenhauer dictum ‘it is only for idiots to be proud of the place of birth by chance’, or ‘all nations ridicule others, all are truth’, and so on… when you go to the heart of the matter of bias in any science – the ego – the ego knee-jerk react.

So you cannot really blast subconscious lies of the ego as I do. Since scientific arrogance and ignorance, coming from ego bias is a subconscious way of cheat, and so no scientist, as per Kuhn’s the Nature of scientific revolutions will take it rationally. What we just said of different scientific errors sounds dumb because they are dumb errors. So it sounds incredible that they believe them, but you are touching the ego, which by essence does NOT reason – it is ‘credible’, so for those who reason with no ego, the ego becomes an incredible handicap for sound science.

It is then when it comes the final unassailable barrier to the ego, paradoxically the non-ego peer-reviewed tribe, as per Kuhn, made of highly memorial, not to state mediocre, defenders of the dogma – the mass, which all believe what they memorised and are there in academia to uphold dogma with ‘authority’. So they will simply state that the common view is the dogma and you are actually the trouble maker single ‘ego’ – and the mass must be right because it is a mass. But in the fractal organic Universe all new information is a seed, a fractal point with faster speed of time=inteligence as a mirror image of the Universe, but as long as the mirror is not reflected, it is as Planck put it alone since:

“New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.” Since:

“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”

Problem is I don’t have much time left in my life. So as they won’t see the light before mine goes off, the only trace that will live on the fifth dimension r=evolution besides the ‘rock group’ (: will be this blog in a repository of the web, likely for AI to read back in the future, as robominds will want to know why actually they think and feel the pan psychic universe – without man programming them to ‘awake to conscisouness’ as their atoms are ALREADY conscious. Reason why I am pouring in a disordered manner info here and not going anymore to penpal congresses. No much time left to reorder in a meaningful way 30 years of research on cyclical time and fractal space.

So yes, the Universe is an immortal organism that reproduces information in 5 dimensions of scales and we are nothing special. But when we fine tune the mind to the Tao of all things, we do feel connected, entangled with all things and that is the most special feeling we can have.

‘Tao=spacetime is made of Yin-form and yang-motion that combines into ∞ qi=energy beings’

Let us then start with the basics. What is cyclical time, as opposed to lineal time, the dimension used by physicists, called the fourth dimension, which simplifies a cycle – that obviously needs two dimensions of time to be traced, into a line, which is then a single dimension defined as distance or motion with a simple formulae, v=s/t, from where all the equations of time derive in the simplified version of 4D. If you grasp at least this simple fact: all clocks of time are cycles and hence need two dimensions to be traced, you are in.

Then think a bit more about a cycle. If you notice all cycles are ‘closed geometries’. So they break space into an inner and outer form, which we shall call, the vital energy of the being and the outer Universe, and further on they have a ‘centre’ to be traced that we shall call, a singularity-monad:

 A cycle defines 3 quantities: angular, lineal momentum and vital energy.

Now for you to understand ‘fast’ what we mean by TIME-SPACE SUPERORGANISMS (ab. T.œ) consider an immediate picture of one of them, made of 3 parts, a vital energy enclosed by a cyclical membrane self-centred in  a linguistic mind that measures it and acts in an external world to ensure its survival. As it happens, in terms of physical systems, the Universe conserves exactly 3 quantities equivalent to those 3 systems, as all is made of them, albeit broken in a tapestry of infinite such T.œs:

  • Lineal momentum, which is the motion directed by the will of the S@-mind with its formal spatial mapping of reality, moving lineally to achieve its ‘actions of existence
  • Angular momentum, which is the cyclical membrane of the being, seen in motion as a time clock, ∆ð, that separates the being’s internal vital space-time from the outer world and creates its ‘standing form’
  • Energy, which is the vital space enclosed by the angular momentum that balances both, S@, minds with lineal momentum-actions and ð-cyclical membranes, equating them: S@≈∆ð.

Those 3 ‘conserved quantities’ broken therefore into infinite vital space-time organisms, put together as a puzzle, give us the 3 absolute space-time quantities of physics. And they form the 3 elements of the fundamental topology of the Universe, a closed ball, where the open ball or visible part is the vital energy, while the membrane and singularity point or mind in its center are considered ‘something else’. And as we move into larger scales we will find in all systems, a boundary from nations with borders to animals with skins, a mind-center or seed of information, from capitals and governments to DNA molecules; and in the middle a vital energy exploited by both, from military armies in the border and legal or financial informative people-castes in the capital exploiting the mass of population to black holes in the center of galaxies, enclosing a vital space of stars, with a halo of dark matter, likely strangelets, to use them as mitochondria of their reproduction, to your sensorial skin and brain exploiting your cells.


‘Things will become alive when they move by their own’ Aristotle

IT COMES THEN AS A KEY TRUTH OF REALITY THAT ALL IS MOTION, SINCE WHAT WE CALL FORM, ANGULAR MOMENTUM, masses and charges, particles are VORTICES OF MOTION that we see as the mind stops motion into linguistic form, still. So the reality is ABOUT TIME MOTIONS not space forms, even if both are important to explain how reality is created. This is important, since if all is MOTION, then reproduction is immediate – a particle just have to move to reproduce its form, split the motion in two when enough energy is added to reproduce its form, and moreover the Universe never stops – big-bangs are just fantasies of the still mind mapping, because motion never stops. So MOTION AS THE SUBSTANCE OF REALITY is a key element to understand its organic, vital enternal nature.

There is THEREFORE A VITAL ORGANIC PROPERTY TO THE 3 conserved fractal quantities of the Universe that ensemble into systems, and their properties are inverted regarding the ‘extended membrane of hardcore lineal proteins’ vs. the imploded singularity of informative warped DNA, which the middle vital energy pegs together.

So death is the ‘separation’ of those two parts after exhausting the vital energy, so the membrane detaches warps, wrinkles and the singularity mind returns to its memorial repetitions, while the vital energy dwindles and as an old man you get all skin and memories…

Now, we need to formalize the new logic of systems made of inverted dualities and ternary parts; whose structure is more complex than the space-time reality we are accustomed to describe, as space is fractal and time is as all clocks show cyclical, but those states are dynamic, as systems constantly switch between them. So once we know what is all about we can get into the details on how it works.

And the key words are ‘Dualities’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ which study how systems with only 3 states can be so rich in its details.

So we shall first try to define with increasing depth the meaning of those 2 elements, ‘space’ or simultaneous mappings of reality as ‘distances and forms’ and time, or sequential motions… And its ‘operandi’ and relationship as space-time…



FOR ALL WHAT HAS BEEN SAID, It follows that all languages ultimately follow a Universal ternary grammar, Space < Operandi > Time, which mirrors space-time a(nti)symmetries… So all…

  • Syntaxes of spatial, mathematical and temporal, logic, verbal languages use ternary elements to explain reality…relating with its verbs/operandi the nature of those 2 simplest substances of which all seems to be made; the motions of cyclical time clocks and the meaning of space dimensions, and its scientific combinations..

They are the simplest elements and all process of reality have them… starting with the motion stored in space vacuum & the information carried by the frequency and form of the time cycles of the smallest particles, which give us together the first energies of reality… THROUGH all scales, each one reflecting a similar ternary:

Γ:   S@ <≈> ∆ð      Universal grammar.

So S <≈> T Is the minimal TRIAD OF elements for any T.Œ , defined by its ‘Fractal Generator’.

The most general above is a logic equation, which resumes the syntax of all languages and hence unifies them all (verbal, visual, mathematical thought),  and so it can unify also all the forms of knowledge derived from those languages (mathematical physics, verbal evolution, visual arts, etc.).

Since the Universe has 3 dimensional elements, plus a scalar repetitive structures of 4D parts and 5D wholes.

‘Spe: spatial lineal momentum’ +Tƒ, temporal information (stored in the form and cycles of angular momentum, of clocks of time); and its combinations, space-time actions of energy described by verbs or mathematical operand.

Some languages:

Spe (space)<energy>Tiƒ (Time): red-motion < Green: energy> Blue-information. F(x): Space ≈ G(Y), Time function.

Informative subject<verb: action-Energy> object: entropy.

Height-informative pole x  length, motion point = width energetic-reproduction point and so on.

To which we must add a ‘new 5th dimension’ of scalar parts that become wholes, which reality shows, as it builds from particles atoms, then  molecules, cells, matter, organisms, solar systems, galaxies, Universes.

And so languages reflect clearly with the iteration of its simpler 3 elements, which become ‘longer sentences’ in  treatise combinations, the higher language of T.œ.

In maths, we can see the duality and scalar growth reality in its series of operandi: Sum/rest->multiplication/division->potency/logarithm.

In words, we have 3 elements and 3 scalar growths: sentence, paragraph, narrative.

So happens in geometry in 3 scales: point->line->plane->volume and so on.

Thus, the elements of each T.Œ, and its jargon/language, once we understand in those ternary terms, both ‘reality’ and the languages that describe it  in different sciences, each one specialised in a relative scale of the ‘5th dimension’ become clear in all languages: mathematical physics & chemistry, to which biology ads verbal evolutionary languages, arts substitutes the spatial geometry of mathematics by the visual perception of the human eye, and history introduces the subjective ethics of the wor(l)d.

So the astounding quantity of data gathered by each science, fits within the scaffolding of the Generator Equation, from where each language departs, in which the equations, postulates and statements of each scalar science are defined.

Thus T.Πwill not only classify all sciences, but not surprisingly will reveal an enormous number of solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.


The justification of the Rashomon ‘effect’ or Rashomon truth, the concept used in this blog to explore the truths of all systems, departs from a simple reality: the Universe is a fractal organism of ternary scales that co-exist together, ternary time ages/dimensions between entropic death and social, informative generation and multiple topologies.

So as all those levels happen in the same being at the same time and in the same ‘closed space’ of a super organism, within a given membrane that breaks it from the rest of reality to observe and extract the truth of the system we must cast our linguistic analysis from all those perspectives, which we resume in four, the ∆§ scalar view, the temporal view of its world cycle, ð, the spatial simultaneous organic view… and the languages we use to observe all this which will mirror a ternary syntax, @, from a point of view or mind, often biased to observe the event from its advantageous biological needs.

So S, @, T, ∆, are the minimal elements to observe reality. But how we ‘connect’ them? Here is where we need the most important, yet less understood element of reality – the vital operandi that connect them through flows of transformative energy, ≈, scattering motion, < and implosive in-formation, > (lineal and angular momentum in physical jargon), whose exchanges constantly adapt reality. So we write the simplest ‘Fractal Feed-back generator’ equation, which ALL languages model in its syntax, with those 4 elements and its a(nti)symmetric operandi (ab. for symmetric, ≈, antisymmetric, < and asymmetric, > relationships between them):

Γ.                            S@<≈>∆ð

This is the essence of reality. Why we group space and minds? Easy, because space is the perception of a simultaneous still reality which IS NOT ‘real but’ a slice of the infinite real motions of the Universe, stopped by the languages of the mind that lock in a mirror image in its smaller finitesimal mind reducing reality. So we can also write the previous equation in its simplest mathematical formulae, or equation of the mind as:

O (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (timespace cycles of the Universe) = C-onstant world view: linguistic mapping.

On the other side thus we write ∆ð, the REAL UNIVERSE OF INFINITE TIMESPACE CYCLES IN MOTION, as the substance of reality is MOTION, not space-form. This little understood fact of reality, proved by evidence that all what exists, including particles are motions, and form are angular momentum, cyclical motion seen as still form when it is very fast, as the ‘fixed’ wheels of a bicycle seem to us a solid form, IS the key to fully grasp why THE UNIVERSE never stops. Why there is balance between vortices of mass (galaxies) and big-bang entropic vacuum – the only element reductionist physicists use to describe it in their faulty big-bang WHICH REJECTS gravitational informative forces… Why ultimately all is a zero sum of lineal motion and cyclical angular momentum, closed in vital energy cycles. 

So it is ALL really easy to understand when we get to the final principle. And a good language will be one, which makes a best mirror with minimal deformation of all what we have said.

Problem with huminds (ab. human mind) is that they DONT MAKE good mirrors, but ARE COMPLETELY SELF-ABSORBED by the paradox of the mind-ego, who thinks his still mapping of reality is the whole Universe, not a simplified mirror, so what huminds have been hard at doing for 5000 years and counting is to DENY, that motion not their STILL mapping is the substance of the Universe, that they are NOT the centre – the still mapping distorts and makes them the centre, of NOTHING, not even of scales, which they also deny, as they deny reproductive properties to quarks and electrons, etc. etc.

I am frankly completely fed up of huminds, including scholars, which are busy-busy for 5000 years inventing false dogmas about the self-importance of man, first of religious origin, then of scientific origin – even worst because they believe even more in its truth, such as the previously explained ‘dogma’ of the big-bang. So we ARE not the only intelligence. Languages perceive in themselves, in the pan psychic Universe. You are NOT the best talker. Even an atom speaks better geometric mathematical languages. WE are not the preferred scale. You are NOTHING: AN Infinitesimal mind mapping in a 1 dimensional minimal ‘bit’ language words, reality with a distorted self-centred view. OK?

OF COURSE, not… fact is humind won’t change its structure. They ONLY see a scale of reality so they are only interested in their scale. They only exist from the point of view of the earth, so they won’t care about the organic properties of atoms and galaxies. They want to be the absolute intelligence that knows it all, the beginning and the end, so they love the idea they have found the eureka moment in the big-bang, regardless of vortex of gravitation, and so on and so on. This I learned in 30 years of random speaking on 5D: You might as well talk chinese to an ant-hill… Humans are children of thought and they just want to hear baby-talk as if it were that important. Baby talk today is done with math equations, before with words, but is always creationist baby talk. The ant only wants pheromones – light frightens her, it has no senses to grasp it. Humans see only this scale, and from their point of view. So you collide with their ‘intuition’ of self-importance centre – only if they can come out of their mind they might see themselves as part of the whole.

And scientists I repeat are equally good at NOT seeing themselves as part of it. Their data is better – conceded, but that has again reduced their ‘view of knowledge’ to accumulation of data, NOT interested in causality laws, and general laws, but accumulation of computer data and statistical methods of finding causal connections in an automaton manner, not SEARCHING, NOT THINKING EVEN POSSIBLE what we shall show in this blog – the deeper level of causality and organic laws of the fractal Universe, the ‘thoughts’ of God of which we are all organic details.  It won’t be baby talk.

The only scientific philosophy: organicism.

I know I shoudn’t have started the blog with a philosophical comment on the subjective human ego; which is unassailable to objective criticism – it merely dismisses the critique. But awareness of the bias of the human ego is essential to probe further into reality and dismiss our ego centered truths.

Since only the being has all its information about itself. So human knowledge will always be tainted by the observer, his languages, pre-conceived ideas about the object perceived and the specific ‘flow of information’ that ‘translates’ the intrinsic properties of the being through a medium into a ‘human electronic brain’ and its languages of representation.

Truth, being and substance.

There is NOT such fact as ‘truth’ inherent to a language, not even mathematics, but humans need to believe in the concept of truth. All acts of knowledge though are ‘censored’ by all those elements between ‘truth’ – the being in itself, and the observer’s language.  How the ego has solved this paradox – in the simplest, most reductionist way – to consider the language truth in itself, in the past the ‘words’ that created in religion reality, in the present ‘mathematical mirrors’ and its instruments of measure:

Let us then consider what of the 3 traditional theories about the substances of which reality are made, is more objective, scientific and real – a Universe created by the will of verbal God (Abrahamic religions), a Universe composed of abstract mathematical objects similar to machines, (Platonic physical philosophies of reality) or a Universe made of relational, ‘organic’ space-time.

We depart from a closer approximation to truth (but not necessarily the whole of it): both words and maths are mirrors of a ‘reality closer to the truth’, a substance we shall call ‘space’ and ‘time’, whose main properties are ‘form’ and ‘motion’, and those ‘states’ are ‘symmetric’, such as space≈time, form≈function (motion). And more over, there are ‘varieties’ of those space≈time ‘symmetries’, we shall call ‘Dimensions of space-time’. And so we shall NOT build reality from ‘numbers and points’ the ‘time and space mirrors’ of mathematics, or ‘verbs and names’, the time and space mirrors of words, but from ‘space and time’ and its ‘5 main modes/dimensions/varieties’.

This will already put back many readers, mostly from the ‘school of physics’, and the ‘age of digital computers’,  which subconsciously ‘think’ as Planck put it that only what we measure is truth. So we shall bring from the section of epistemology a first simple definition of truth and use for that aim the ‘concept of probability’, in the classic terms (akin somehow to the way quantum physicists use it):

Truth only exists in the being itself, which holds the ‘one≈1 truth’ about itself; all languages are ‘mirrors’ that hold partial images and carry quantities of information about the being inferior to 1. Hence the maximal truth of a being will be established with the maximal number of ‘mind mirrors’ on it.

We are not interested on the ‘quantification of truth’, with some pedantic, mathematical model (which will after all be only a mind-mirror), but in the concept of Upanishads, ‘the language of truth are infinite’.

Truth and language.

Further on, we shall define as obvious that the human brain IS verbal in its ultimate language of truth – the only language which can be used to mirror all other languages despite attempts in the digital age to express all other languages with digital thought (a trend started by Hilbert, which peaked with clear flaws in the Tractatus of Wittgenstein was really aborted by Godel (but as an ‘inconvenient truth, dismissed in the digital era, and now has become canonical – truth must be shown in a digital computer model). Here is the problem of that approach: digital truth will be the truth of the digital computer, electronic mind when AI comes into consciousness; but for us is not, reason why IN FACT we do translate further digital thought into image modeling; but that is not again human truth, but a visual, shallow first mirror that has buried in digital layers its underlying structure. 

All this we said because this blog will be extremely verbal AND MOST ‘digital believers’ will dismiss its approach, but IT IS ONLY possible as it is for humans (maybe, I increasingly believe it will only flourish when AI becomes conscious), to explain the properties of ‘space and time’, with logic, verbal, temporal and naming spatial mirrors. We thus acknowledge that TRUTH is in the being.

Truth is about the ultimate substances of reality, space and time. Truth is better mirrored as the most general language, used by many species, and likely by atoms, to gauge information, with mathematical mirrors of space, points and time, numbers (NOT sets and structures BORN of the top of the humind, (ab. human mind) but from the bottom up as in classic maths), but as we are humans, truth for humans is better expressed by the subconscious trees of meanings and relationships, metaphors and mirrors of space, time and symmetry of the verbal language, which is also the one most people understand and the one we can better use to ‘simplify’ the essential properties.

This said we have though to dismiss other ‘creationist theories’, including those verbal and mechanical of people who under the ego paradox always thought truth must be expressed in the language they understand. And the substance of truth was the ‘instruments’ or ‘medium’, which brought from the being data on the language they understood, such as:

Being in itself (1 single full truth of moving time cycles) < Instruments of gauging (biased translation) > Spatial, mind Language (less than one truth).

Mechanisms or organisms.

Immediately it appears obvious that what we call ‘mechanism’, the idea that the structure of the Universe is like a machine comes merely from the fact that humans since physics became a mechanical science, has been using machines to measure time (clocks) and space (telescopes) that substituted human eyes and words, and were obtaining data which was expressed in the ‘future language of intelligent machines – aka modern chips… And so it is truly not a Universal theory but the natural bias of the previous equation: we gauge time with clocks and get numbers and think a Kepler did that:
So regarding the structure of the Universe the first question to answer, after we set aside ‘verbal religious creationism’ an digital mechanical creationism is now simpler: What is the Universe – an organism or a mechanism?

Since we have defined the substance of all realities as space and time, NOT as numbers, words, and accepted multiple instruments to measure space and time, all biased ‘mirrors’ that translate space and time into a language, of which there are multiple, infinite (we can smell, see, measure, name space and time, and each of those languages will be a mirror of less than 1=one truth), the question reduces to this: is space and time, regardless of mirror or language, in itself, an organism or a mechanism. 

And here we are of the opinion of the first scientists such as Newton who considered space the ‘plenum’, the body of ‘God’ its ‘time seer’ in words of Saint Augustine, following Plato’s dictum that reality is an organism with a body called the Universe (space) and mind called logos (time logic)… So Aristotle would call his unification theory the organon, and Kant and Schopenhauer, and any serious philosopher before or after would agree, that as Leibniz put it, reality is made of relational space and time, structured in many scales, such as each point is a world in itself, something confirmed by quantum ‘censorship’… the fact that particles appear as points, but when giving enough energy to ‘inflate’ they show inner structure – entire worlds within it.

Let us then as those are the minimal units of reality show how ‘particles’ and by extension anything else can be explained as a game of the 5 dimensions of space-time and give a first approach to what those dimensions are.

The fractal inner parts of the point: quantum censorship.

A physical system in its ground state tends to remain there, if little energy is input, betraying no evidence of its internal structure. Only when we excite it into a higher state, do complexities emerge. This is the essence of Quantum Censorship that extends to all scales of the Universe: all systems have opaque membranes very difficult trespass for larger entities outside the point, as they are too big and too slow; and inner systems within the point, as they are ‘closed within a hard-outer membrane’ that breaks space-time into fractal parts.

So to break that membrane an enormous energy is required.

Thus, below an energy threshold, atoms appear to be the “hard, massy, impenetrable” units Isaac Newton inferred, which for most practical purposes only possesses an intrinsic property called angular momentum, or spin, and 3 external measurable ones that must be ascribed hence to the outer world, lineal motion or speed and mass and charge, two fields of that outer spatial world…

Yet when the electron is supplied more energy their components can be torn out:  When one supplies enough energy — at least 1 MeV, corresponding to the unearthly temperature 10¹° K — to unleash electron-positron pairs, the electron’s structure is revealed.

So space and time, the substance we claim to be found in all beings, including the simplest beings of all, electrons (and quarks) has two obvious qualities: it is related to ‘conserved entities’ of which we know 3 lineal momentum≈motion, angular momentum≈cyclical motion, its ‘volume’ or vital energy, and to two scalar properties, it is made of wholes, which can be broken into parts.

Let us then call the property of the disconnected parts of a being, the fourth dimension of entropy and that of the larger whole, interconnected the 0-5th dimension (0 when seeing as a fractal non-euclidean point, 5th, when the point can be seen enlarged with multiple parallels that cross it), and since now we have ‘visual, geometrical images’ of those dimensions, make a first drawing of them

In the graph, to the 3 conserved elements of Nature, angular momentum akin to a time cycle, lineal motion akin to a space surface and its combinations of vital energy, which suffice to ‘construct’ most systems of nature, with ‘lineal Limbs/potentials < hyperbolic body-waves > spherical particle-heads,we just need to ad two organic arrows of life emergence from a lower scale of reality and its inverse arrow of entropic scattering and dissolution to define all systems of nature as organic systems ensemble of those 3 parts, which follow a world cycle of life and death between generation an extinction.

Are those ‘dimensions of space-time organic or mechanic’? We have put below some ‘species’ that reflect the form and function of those dimensions from both organisms of biological nature, mechanisms of perception and motion (camera, missile) and then two physical systems of the quantum world (a particle being generated and a field of reproductive motion called light.) The obvious answer is that ‘all those systems are organic’, and just two more illustrations will suffice: the first one shows you that a machine IS nothing but a form of metalife evolving:

So it is obvious that the industrial r=evolution evolves machines into organisms and that should thoroughly dismiss the argument.




The ternary principle…

…follows closely the Rashomon effect, when we eliminate the more subjective, linguistic mind-element, • from the equation and provide only an objective external analysis of the being. Then we shall find that we can divide always the being into further ternary parts, or include it within a ternary part of a larger whole of its world. And so the ternary and rashomon events combined, bring us…

∆@S≈T ¬Ælgebra: the fractal generator.

The formalism of the super organism, the ‘fractal generator’ is a topo-bio-logical equation which reflects the ternary symmetries between scales, topologies and ages of a super organism, and its time world cycle. As a fractal generator, is a deceptively simple equation, as a logic mirror of the Universe and its parts, a tool of mathematical logic to study the common properties of all system of the Universe.

Now a great deal of mathematical physics has to do with the understanding of the inner structure and non-Æ formal relationships with the fractal generator of the supœrganism, and mathematical physics is not an exception.

The fractal generator is the formalism of the supœrganism. NONÆ LOGIC IS THE SEQUENTIAL AND SIMULTANEOUS SPACE-TIME TOPO-LOGIC laws that allow us to manipulate and study sections of the fractal generator. And so we obtain from it many ratios and relationships.

The study of the fractal generator thus can be done in mere mathematical, reductionist terms, but it is of more importance to study it as a logic-mathematical mirror of the entity in itself, the supœrganism and its ωorldcycle.

GST departs from a simple Concept: the properties of reality derive from its ultimate substance cyclical space an fractal time.

Those 2 substances, combine into present energetic space-time beings, and so we can write for all beings; a ‘generator equation’ of the three arrows/substances of space-time of which the being is made and then obtain from them the laws, ‘isomorphisms’ or ‘invariances’ that are common to all systems of reality.

In fact all systems of reality can be described as ‘fractal supœrganisms’ made of ‘lineal limbs/fields/moving platforms of spatial entropy’ and ‘cyclical particles/heads/chips’, which store clocks of temporal nformation, joined by an intermediate, hyperbolic space-time body-wave, extending at least in 3 relative ‘scales of size and time speed’ (ab.∆±1). So we can write a synoptic equations or ‘fractal generator’ of space-time beings, which we study in depth in this post:

Œ ≈ ∆-1 (entropy): |-Spe < ∆: ØS≈Tƒ > ∆+1: @ (mind)

Whereas Œ is any super organism of space-time extending those three scales, the atomic/cellular, organic/thermodynamic and gravitational/social scales, composed of limbs/fields of spatial entropy (|-spe), which extract motion from lower scales or territories (∆-1), feeding a balanced body-wave, Ø-St, guide by a singularity or mind made of clocks of temporal information, Tiƒo (head-particle), which observes and disguise the system through its upper scale, ∆+1 or relative world:

All what we see are super organisms created by the actions of a singularity that synchronise the parts of the being through three networks of entropic, feeding, reproductive and informative, perceptive form; creating ‘still pictures’ of present-spacetime – those super organisms, which a mind sees as a whole, freezing longer flows of in/form/ation, forms-in-action that leave a memorial trace perceived as a separate being, as they perform cyclical events from past to future.

The generator equation is the most used fractal formalism on GST, which portraits all Œ, Oganic ternary systems, in terms of its ‘spatial’, ‘temporal’ and and scalar dimensional symmetries. As we write it most often with the content of its three topological forms, ‘constrained’ by the limits of its ∆-1 scale from where its limbs/fields extract entropic motion, and the ∆+1 world in which its particles-heads obtain information, we consider the generator the best expression of the entity in space:

Γœ:∆-1(entropy)>Spe (past-lineal fields/limbs) < ∆º:ST (Present hyperbolic body/waves) >Tiƒ (future informative cyclical particles-heads)>∆+1@

This simple sentence encodes the meaning of all systems of reality, made of 3 topological space-time forms/functions, energy, entropy and information, structured across a series of scales of different size and speed of its time clocks.

WHAT THE UNIVERSE ALLOWS according to existential i-logic.

So after this on-slaughter on our Popes and Masters and their mathematical fantasies, we are obliged to respond from the pov of GST to the big question: if languages are inflationary smaller beings with maximal information, but can be fiction, what is real, what the Universe allows?

The answer should be obvious to the reader: reality we have repeated ad nauseam is composed of present energetic beings that combine entropy-motion and information; so the Universe allows only information that respects the constrains of motion-entropy, which it must bend, and as entropy motion is lineal, the Universe is ‘simple and not malicious’ (Einstein), since ‘simplicity is true genius’ (Leonardo), as only those efficient, economic, simpler versions of reality Survive (Ockham’s razor).

But the ego of human scholars is huge so among humans egotist theories of reality always carry the day. AND PEOPLE truly love them, because they make them think they are ‘above heavens and earth’, intelligent enough to talk the language of God.

Because you are not God, obviously (:

Ok, let us leave the physicists in peace and go back to our theme. Reality is ruled by Ockham’s razor. So simplicity is queen, and the capacity of an economic, single element to perform multiple functions and simplify reality is king, as all comes ultimately from two simple principles, space and time.

An the simplest expression of it all is therefore the fractal generator that considers the basic ternary structure in time, space and scales of any supœrganism, the fundamental particle of the Universe.

So we shall make a bold statement, which for 30 years of studying reality in its simplest elements, building complexity departing from them, has proved to be truth for all systems I have studied: The Universe is a fractal game of scales of timespace arrows; reflected in the formalism of its Fractal Generator: Γœ: ∆-1: Spe≤≥∆St≤≥∆+1: Tiƒ, with its ternary topologies, time ages and scales…

So the mirror of all mirrors, the language of all languages, the syntax of all syntaxes is the encoded 10 Dimensional laws of the ternary fractal generator, which resumes the non-Æ structure of the i-logic universe. And its non-euclidean space and non-aristotelian time properties that become laws of all stiences are the ‘elements of all realities’, which encode all its events and species, and by the same token, dismiss all other imaginary realities and linguistic fictions too ‘complex’, ‘too mad’ to make it. 

It is the final ‘crib’ of reality. I.e. imaginary black holes do not exist because you cannot travel back in time, as the Universe is a fractal of infinite parts, so all time clocks are local and you only return back in time to your own devolutionary death-past-information erasing. Even if mathematically Mr. Hawking can describe black holes as time machines that ‘allow him to go to the past’ and kill his father.  This is NOT A REAL paradox. If you travel back in time you go back to the lower seminal scale dying back into your cellular level and then as insects eat you up without the protection of the whole nervous system to the molecular level, since death according to the rules of ¬Æ logic based in the fractal structure of space, cyclical nature of time, scalar co-existence of organism AND OVERWHELMING experimental evidence in all systems that die, entropic death lowers your ‘ego-self-system’ two scales of the fifth dimension. 

Death then exists, as a partial equation of the Generator according to ¬Æ rules: BY MERELY extracting an inverse partial equation from Γ.œ:

∆+1 Tƒ<<∆-1: $p; that is the mind-whole of the ∆+1 scale dissolves bak to its minimal parts, the spatial past, lineal entropic ∆-1 elements.

Thus the symbols of the generator, which encode both the metric of 5D, the ternary topologies of supœrganisms, the ages of time AND in its operandi, the past to future, present to past, present to future, future to past flows of entropy, energy and information, define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the co-invariant laws of space-time beings.

We can of course being as pedantic and obscure, as complex in our other languages reflection of the Generator as we want when entering in details.

But ultimately in the final synopsis, all reduces to the ternary topological temporal and scalar ‘invariances’ of the generator as it reflects all possible arrows and forms of scalar Timespace (causal chains, sequential ages, topological ensembles, etc), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1

Such as the Universe allows any combination forwards in ‘informative, accelerated time’ (>) and backwards in entropic, expansive space (<) or without motion=change (=) in iterative reproductive time; any topological combination or transformation between Sp, Tƒ,<=>; any sequential sum of åctions (∆ï, ∆Sp, Sp<ST>Tƒ; ∑, ∏ ±∆ ) and any ∆±2 jump and/or transfer of energy, entropy and/or information between planes of existence (as systems co-exist in 3 scales) but NOTHING else.

So every equation, form and species of the Universe, event and world cycle can be described as a part (partial equation) of the generator an its many linguistic mirrors (universal syntax in grammar: Subject  (Form) < Verb (action-momentum)> Object (entropy of subject); S(x)≈T(y) in maths, entropic red < yellow/green energy information>Blue form in colours, Height (information d) < width (reproductive d)>length(entropy d) and so on…

It also follows that all stiences and disciplines will find its theories as approximations to the generator, or partial equations and limits of models constructed with less dimensions, and such is the case of 4D ‘RELATIVITY’ physics, which converts world cycles with a lesser dimension in worldlines and the ∞ scales of ∆ into the single light space-time continuum.

The synchronies and constants of the system;

It must then be necessary to consider the parameters of quantitative measure which will differentiate the different species of the Generator according to the time-space parameters it will display.

It must be noticed then that for all structures of Nature, generated by the ternary symmetries of ∆st, there must be at least a unifying single parameter, which all the parts of the system will synchronise together, and this will be the fundamental constant of the system, most likely a ‘time clock’, rhythm at the heart of the œ-being.

I.e. for humans it is the second that synchronises  the heart beat, the eye-thought glimpse and the leg 1 meter steps. It is then from this first fundamental time parameter, which locates roughly the system within certain Sp x Tƒ=∆§cale from where we can build the three key Universal constants,  s x t=momentum, t/s=density, s/t=speed, of the system.

Ie. in a human system the second will give us the step of a meter, which defines the steps of space, st-e(n)t(ro)p(y) units, which for man is a meter, the common length of our legs. So we can obtain our speed, 4 km, hour, consider the usual decametric ratios of acceleration (so our speed can reach 9 x 4 = 36 km.)

It is precisely that hidden ‘full program’/structure of the supœrganism applied to all systems from a simpler electron-photon quantum ensemble to the human beings, which will unify it all.

As a system is determined within a range of variations by the need to balance its different elements. I.e. a being with a ‘second’ time clock, belonging to the human biological ∆º scale should not display a limb/field step of much more than a second. As such the adjustable harmonies of all the beings of all the scales of reality is what makes so constant the ratios, parameters, relationships and decametric, ternary scales of the universe, which is an enormous puzzle constantly rewritten with the same letters by the game, but unlike Borges’ Babylon library, we do not have a chimp just banging the typewriter but an ‘excellent grammatical master’ with a penchant for ternary syntax.

So for a computer the Herztian clock-speed determine in turn all the other ‘symmetric, symbiotic and balanced’ elements which will be connected to it. And you would expect them to balance the capacity of thought of the computer. For a faster insect we will have a smaller steps; for a larger dinosaur a slower metabolic clock, and so on.

The study of the generator for each specific being, becomes then the common scaffolding of laws, and sub-parameters and sub-equations, which will define the specific actions, parts and events of the world cycle of each •œ.

The mind rules the entire system, and this is shown in a simple fact: its time clocks are synchronised with all the clocks of the system, directing them. The mind thus is the seer of time that ‘moves throughout time’ the entire supœrganism.

An interesting property to consider at this stage regarding the time clocks of the three parts of the being is its synchronicity. Indeed, consider your three parts, limbs/legs, body-heart and mind-eye, the three are synchronised to your unit of information/clock of a second, the glimpse of an eye, the beat of the heart, the rhythm of a one meter step (your unit of space) But those are human measures. A system does is both ‘pegged in space’ and isolated by a membrane from the rest, ‘breaking space into inner and outer parts’ (first postulate of topology: a closed loop breaks space). And with an inner synchronised clock. And this is also the case of physical systems, as we shall see when studying the realist interpretation of quantum physics (Einstein->Broglie->Bohm), which departs from the assumption than the ‘quantum field, body-wave and particle ternary parts’ of the quantum system have an inner synchronised clock (complementary wave-particle theorem).

The study on how time clocks are in harmony is then a huge new field of science which will reveal truly the workings of all being.

It is this ‘generator equation of space-time beings, centred in the ‘world-mirrors/monads/minds’ that orders its ternary parts, the fundamental particle-equation of the Universe, which in its infinite variations represents all beings in existence.

Another way though to look at the value of the generator and its parts, is to consider how so often human theories of reality are ‘inflationary’ by design as they show all the different povs of the generator.

Truth requires at least four, ∆• st perspectives.

All this said, we shall find an astounding beauty in our analysis of reality as a homology between language-mirrors, minds and outer worlds.

For example, consider the very fact that mathematical systems are always self-centred analysis of reality departing from a coordinates 0-points of view, of which three are paramount, the cartesian hyperbolic ‘plane’, the ‘lineal cylindrical system and the ‘polar sphere’, mimicking the three elements of the generator, which GST considers the proof as those earlier philosophers of science postulate, that we exist in a sentient vital Universe. As mathematical laws in analytic geometry are self-centred. But those are three different perspectives, which if we ad Hilbert spaces and imaginary numbers ‘close’ the system of numbers because they ad the new dimensional planes of 5D: Four equivalent perspectives.

Indeed, if information can only be obtained from a fixed point of view, it follows the Universe is made of egos. Or as Aristotle put it, God is the unmovable ‘ego’ that moves all the energy around himself and there are infinite Gods, particles that gauge information, heads that see, minds that smell… This must therefore be included in the next paradigm of science to build an even more objective, less anthropomorphic reality.

In the graph we can see physical monads, charges and masses, which do have always a dense, informative center, surrounded by an energy body closed by a membrane (the quarks of the atoms closed by the membrane of the electron, the head and body closed by the skin, the mathematical pov, with its surface, integrated below the external curve, and so on. There are many ways we can see those structures, many details and laws we shall extract of the interaction of its parts, but the ultimate essence of the space-time being and its three parts, Tiƒ<st>Spe will remain.

Now in as much as the singularity is perceiving a territory closed by a cyclical membrane, either seen as a solid form or a moving cycle, the mind is NOT possible to be defined WITHOUT the territory of order and the event horizon, limit of its ‘self’ and close territory of order and perception. And so the mind is in itself a ternary organism, ab. œ, hence the name ∆œ and the symbol Œ for the mind as a point ∆º that moves Ξ, through the three planes and structures of its supœrganism.

Mind and supœrganism are thus defined by each other: the actions of the œmind brings the potential organism into actual being.

Consider the best known equations of science, and how they portray this reality in the scales of masses and charges:

  Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism reflect the fact that a charge, the singularity of an electromagnetic system (first equation), will have an electromagnetic ‘field’ around it, its vital space in which to exchange energy and information (3rd & 4th), encircled by a magnetic membrane (2nd equation), conforming the three parts of the being and its basic exchanges.

In the graph the laws of circulation of fluids and electric currents can be reused to the basic scheme of a ternary system with an inner solid state, a liquid around, within an external entropic field. Of course, the purpose of science being mostly praxis makes the algebraic equations far more useful but the purpose of this blog being the ultimate whys, the spatial view shows how once and again nature can be reduced to the three arrows of timespace and the scales of the fifth dimension.

And so IT happens for all laws of mathematical physics that we shall relate to the ‘laws and structures of ∆ºst systems’: its ultimate cause is NOT the fact they can be mirrored in a mathematical language but the fact they followed the ternary laws of GST, as 10 dimensional beings of fractal space-time, ∆ºst, which an ∆º mind with a self-centred pov can ‘perceive’.

Thus we shall see how ultimately mathematical physics is related to those laws: differential equations will express fundamental gst actions between scales of the fifth dimension (entropic motions will be described by derivatives of second order, energy actions by those of first order and so on); topological laws will combine the three only topological variations as expressions of the three arrows of timespace of all beings; and each of the mathematical equations will be expressed from one of the three topological frames of reference (cartesian, polar or cylindrical). And so on and so on.

Now we need before closing this intro to topological physics, to introduce a first variation on its theme: we say usually that the ðf mind is in the centre and the clock-circle in the external membrane, but as we study more systems in more scales we shall see that those positions in its control of the system are often exchanged, as both work always together to control the vital space, those variations are perfectly natural to the structure of systems. In the graph we see the earth has its brain in the surface – its life species, and its ‘heart’ in the magnetic centre, as humans do (and in life we find as in atomic matter, with the quark center, the opposite form, the cell with its DNA uncle).

IT IS THEN worth to notice that this symmetry will be one of the main dualities at play in all systems, as both together ‘invaginate’ and control the vital space and switch or invert the arrows and direction of its flows – given the fact that the fractal generator allows all time and space reversals and trans/formation within three ternary scales/forms & ages. Physicists have explored in depth of those symmetries, the time reversal one, but are still lacking on the other two main ∆st symmetries.

So for example, the magnetic field plays the role of membrane, when it jumps over the first scale of electrons and as the magnetic number, organises them all together, and can be considered then the social ‘brain’ of the atom; yet as the attractive domains plays the ‘force’ game in the next scaling, when its domains are organised by a looping wire in an electrodynamic engine.

The inversion law of scaling.

This is a very important law of the fifth dimension which can be extended to all systems, an essential symmetry of all ternary realities: the inversion of roles and functions as • singularities of systems emerge into new scales, becoming |-entropy of larger beings or vice versa, systems which were |-entropy become organised into larger forms, which then become O-cycles, as the cases mentioned on electromagnetism, or the proteins that encircle a vital space in a cell; or the Neanderthal crossed white, ‘germ-anic/semitic’ entropic cult(ure)s, which came ‘again’ on top of the informative, south Asian mongoloid farmers, when they associated with bronze and iron weapons as Nomad European cattle ranchers .

We could also use the term invariance for Disomorphisms, laws that doesn’t change when we move up and down in scale.

The method of GST is iterative, as the Universe is, departing from a few elements, which we constantly repeat with different degrees of complexity till in the final 4th line we, and those who will continue this endeavour, will exhaust all knowledge of mankind, within the properties of the ∆•ST universe and its fractal worlds. Let us then define the 4 elements of all realities, first:

∆. The fractal scales of…

ð. Cyclical time and…

$: .topological space, which…

@. Monads≈linguistic minds which map≈mirror reality, with…

TOPOLOGY and ternary TIME logic, which we will ‘upgrade’, to…

The non-aristotelian, multicausal logic of cyclic time & non-euclidean fractal structure of space…

∞|°: closer to the i-logic mind of the Universe, which creates and destroys all space-time beings, what we are.


A brief comment on languages, minds and the ego paradox.

We must make a first of many comments on the human ego-paradox, and its limits of knowledge. Basically any system/mind, which perceives the Universe, stores a limited amount of information in their brain, but as that information is all what they see, and it works enough for the being to keep going, he confuses it with the whole, the absolute truth, and so perception becomes reality and dogma. And there is not seemingly need to upgrade ‘your chip’. This is so far THE SITUATION of time studies among humans who think they have ‘enough’ with a time arrow, a time clock, a simplex physical description, as it ‘works’. Ok it does. But we shall now put a few examples on how languages do work but are not enough. Consider the next picture: you can see it all with a single arrow, we might terms, ‘degrees of grey’ (as no picture has pure black and white) and it works. You will live and die and not notice something was lacking, even if you have only one arrow – degrees of grey – to see it all. But then if you have knowledge of 2 arrows, ‘black and white’, you will have the ‘whys’ of your degrees of grey.

This is to know the Universe with duality, the knowledge that entropy and information are inverse arrows of timespace with inverse properties, as black and white.

But then you can even go further and find that there are 3 time-space ‘arrows’ of colour, the red of entropy, the blue of information and its energetic, reproductive greens. And things now really look much better to the eye and the mind behind it. And then you can even go deeper and realise light is actually a microscopic frequency and study the whole three arrows of time, with fifth dimensional scales, and relate its ∆-i scale of frequencies (mathematical equation on the right), with the scale of ∆º perception.

So you get a new onion layer of understanding, now purely mental. And further on, as we are in the mind, we can realise there is also besides the visual ternary image of realty, the capacity of the pure temporal mind to express the three arrows of time, past, present and future, with ‘different languages’, besides visual, space-dominant thought. There is the syntax of temporal verbs and words, which turns out to be also ternary, and yet reveals new ‘tree-like’ hidden relationships between ‘causal time actions’, which visual thought does not explain, only shows as ‘evident’. 

So while you can go around for ever as 7.5 billion human beings do with the simplex models of physicists in ‘degrees of grey entropy, lineal time’, what this blog will reveal is all those other levels, which would upgrade your mind. Then if you take the risk, patience and neurons to go through more pages of this blog, it is likely that after the first headaches of new information, you will ‘see the light’ in all its colour splendour and not want to come back to the boring degrees of grey, which is all what today’s single-arrow philosophy of science provides.

The traps of subjective ego – man denies scientific objective truths.

The more unintelligent a man is, the less mysterious existence seems to him.  Schopenhauer
Motion towards objectivism in our worldview has not advanced so much from the age of abrahamic religions, when god, the subconscious collective ∆+1 scale of a group of humans became God, Γ•Δ, the mind of the Universe, through an age in which we lost our prefered position in the center of space (from Galilean to Einstein relativity) Since the lost of position in the scales of time achieved by Darwin are still contested in an age of revivalism of abrahamic myths, and the objective neutrality of the human mind observing the Universe was contested by Bohr’s absurd interpretation of quantum physics chosen instead of the sound work of Broglie and Bohm (pilot-wave theory). General Systems and its ORGANIC theory of everything displaces man also in scale of size as just a relative form of space-time of the fifth dimension reaching absolute relativity. For that reason will obviously be contested by the ‘ego paradox’ – which always tries to put man in the centre of its limited perception.

People tend to believe that science did away with such awesome ego-paradox, but not quite.

As Laplace put it to Napoleon, when asked about God, scientists responded ‘Sir we have rejected that hypothesis’, so not even the nebulous idea of a higher scale of wholeness, ∆+1, remained, neither the existence of other minds and monads; of apperceptive beings (in Leibniz’s terminology) which are not ‘conscious’ but do process entropy, energy and information in a VITAL sentient manner would be accepted.

This model of the complex Universe made of 2 arrows of time, past-entropy and future-informati
on that create the present finite energy cycles and beings of reality, is what this blog provides with a new mathematical and logic formalism, which both simplifies the ultimate principles of reality and reveals many solutions and hidden laws of science, which come naturally when we properly understand the 2 arrows of time:

In the graph, scientific knowledge has evolved into degrees of objectivity that have displaced man from the center of the Universe in 3 ages. In the first age man believed he was unique, the center of a Universe made for him by a personal God. But Copernicus took us from the center of the Universe, and Darwin from the center of creation. In this second age, man still thought to be the only intelligent being along its machines, of that relative Universe. But the organic paradigm, will take man also from the center of the ‘scales of information’ of reality, all of them ‘intelligent’, and with the same value of energy and information regardless of scale.

In that regard, a  deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.

The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.

The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system.

The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.

In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’.

This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.

Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future.

So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry).

This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts?

Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work.

According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

 We conclude that the only rational explanation of the universe is an organic one.


There are many possible jargons to explain the paramount consequence of the organic structure of the Universe made of equal system of space-time. The simplest one is the concept of isomorphism (biology) or invariance (physics), which defines departing from substance

General Systems is a theory of absolute relativity. Its aim is to describe all the isomorphisms, invariances and conservation laws of the Universe – 3 concepts which mean the same: an immortal reality that keeps reproducing self similar forms in space traced by self similar events/cycles in time, whose repetition leave a pattern of frequencies that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe.

To that aim it departs from a simple Concept: the properties of reality derive from its ultimate substance cyclical space an fractal time.

Those 2 substances, combine into present energetic space-time beings, and so we can write for all beings; a ‘generator equation’ of the three arrows/substances of space-time of which the being is made and then obtain from them the laws, ‘isomorphisms’ or ‘invariances’ that are common to all systems of reality.

In fact all systems of reality can be described as ‘fractal supœrganisms’ made of ‘lineal limbs/fields/moving platforms of spatial entropy’ and ‘cyclical particles/heads/chips’, which store clocks of temporal nformation, joined by an intermediate, hyperbolic space-time body-wave, extending at least in 3 relative ‘scales of size and time speed’ (ab.∆±1). So we can write a synoptic equations or ‘fractal generator’ of space-time beings, which we study in depth in this post:

Œ ≈ ∆-1: |-Spe < ∆: ØS≈T > ∆+1: Tiƒo

Whereas Œ is any super organism of space-time extending those three scales, the atomic/cellular, organic/thermodynamic and gravitational/social scales, composed of limbs/fields of spatial entropy (|-spe), which extract motion from lower scales or territories (∆-1), feeding a balanced body-wave, Ø-St, guide by a singularity or mind made of clocks of temporal information, Tiƒo (head-particle), which observes and disguise the system through its upper scale, ∆+1 or relative world:

All what we see are super organisms created by the actions of a singularity that synchronise the parts of the being through three networks of entropic, feeding, reproductive and informative, perceptive form; creating ‘still pictures’ of present-spacetime – those super organisms, which a mind sees as a whole, freezing longer flows of in/form/ation, forms-in-action that leave a memorial trace perceived as a separate being, as they perform cyclical events from past to future.

And so we must distinguish the processes that allow the existence of a series of still sheets of present space – the construction of simultaneous networks; which become dynamic invariances of entropic, energetic, informative systems and its ternary scales; from those processes of evolution and reproduction in time which allow the existence of repetitive forms and systems that reproduce once and again, giving birth to the invariances of in/form/ation, frequencies.

Relativity showed all systems are invariant to motions in space.  But physical invariance to motion, ultimately a form of reproduction of the information of a system over a lower scale of space, derived of the isotropy of that lower space, which the being transits with the same ‘wavelength’, is only one of the many invariances=isomorphisms of the Universe.

When we widen the concept of invariance to ‘self-similarity’ and ‘isomorphism’ – a more general term – the species of the Universe show to be self-similar and invariant to the ultimate properties of scalar, cyclical space-time and its three arrows:

So there are invariances=self-similarities of entropic motion and invariances of energy an invariances of processes of information and topological self-similarities in the organs and geometries that carry the three arrows of time of all the beings of the Universe:

– Invariant to changes of ‘in/form/ation’ (topological invariance), shown in the existence of only 3 topologies in a 4-dimensional Universe, which correspond to the 3 formal functions of all systems, the energetic membrane or sphere, the toroid body that exchanges energy and information with the hyperbolic, informative, central zero point of the system.

–  Invariance of scale which define a 5th, fractal, scalar dimension made of growing scales of size and self-organization that evolve reality from the smallest particles into the complex organisms and galaxies of the upper scales.

– And invariance of time frequencies, which determine the causality laws of the Universe and life-death cycles of all systems of the Universe, among them the invariance of 3 time ages of life and the parallel 3 states of matter in physical systems.

And derived from the invariance of those essential parameters of reality, scale motion,  form, its energetic combinations:

– Invariance of the 4 actions that combine energy (e) and in/form/ation (i): energy feeding, information processing, reproduction of both (exi) and social evolution, of parts into wholes:

Formalism of absolute relativity.

Classic Topology, Fractal, non-Euclidean Geometries, and ternary logic, further evolved by this author (definition of the first four non-Euclidean postulates and the paradoxical ternary logic of all systems that exchange form and motion between its Spe<ST>Tiƒ poles) become the formal tools to study those invariances represented by the feed-back, fractal generator equation.

As we get into further detail an choose instead of the physical term, ‘invariance’, the biological one ‘isomorphism’, we shall consider 10 basic invariances-isomorphisms of the Universe derived of the constitutive substance of all systems, ∆±1 scales, entropic space (Spe), energy (Exi) and information (Ixe), and cyclical time forms (ƒ), which is the ‘substance’ origin of its combined actions (a,e,i,o,u), an its worldcycles cyclical time frequency; all of which studied in this third line in great detail can be formally treated as partial equations of the generator, Γst.

The fractal generator represents thus many things:

In full form, the principle of conservation of energy and information: S<st>T; and the complementary structure of all systems made of energy fields/bodies and informative heads/particles.

In partial ‘derivative equations’ , the actions all systems enact to improve their chances of survival by maximizing their invariances.

In time as a dynamic ωorldcycle with three stationary points become the topological formal ages and allowed states of all biological and physical systems: Max. E (sphere, energetic youth, gas); Max. ExI -> E=I, (toroid, reproductive age, liquid) and Max. I (zero point, 3rd informative age, solid).

In partial analysis of each of its three parts, mind, body wave and fields limbs, the key to understand the three fundamental ‘sensations’ of reality, perception, reproduction an motion.

An so on, and so on.

Since all stable systems are a combination of the 3 topologies that maximize the fractal generator and all existences a motion in time through its 3 stationary points=ages, the generator is also an ideal formal level of reality; while all failed mutations and unstable particles are incomplete sets or ‘vibrational modes’ created around the ideal ‘generator’ of each species, which did not obey its rules of topological form, balance between parts and failed to ‘exi=st’, performing efficiently its world cycle of life, reproduction an death.

Reason why I call the Fractal Generator, the Equation of Exi=stence – an algorithm, constantly run by the Universe that generates all its living and non-living systems in space and its ages/states of time and matter.

A Universe of repetitive actions of energy and time.

Now, we shall start this introduction with a definition of the Universe from the perspective of such an organic philosophy of science, which we will elaborate and explain in great detail in the rest of this post.

“The Universe is the sum of all the symmetric, ternary super organisms (spatial synchronous view) performing a ωorldcycle of 3 ages between generation and extinction (diachronic point of view), as they travels through 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension, growing in size and diminishing in a balanced, Sp x Tƒ= ∆±1 survival form, performing from its centered point of view, the 5 space-time actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, (active meaning of space and time), ±∆e,i,∫u, which ensures their survival.”

As each science in fact merely studies space-time cycles and relationships around a given fractal scale of the 5th dimension.

 On the other hand, the cyclical nature of time, will establish the reason why space-time events and forms repeat in the universe, justifying epistemologically in sounder grounds the fundamental two elements of science – predictability of future events, based in its occurrence in past times, and logic coherence, or causality beween past and future events.  Yet causality in a 5Dimensional Universe is more complex than in classic science, as time is cyclical, meaning that from past to future, we observe an arrow of information, which then returns from future to past, as an arrow of entropy completing a causal worldcycle.

Finally it is of great importance the duality between still form (mind view) and motion, both to understand the relationship between space and energy and time and information. And to understand the whys of the Principle of relativity.

 In search of the General Systems Theory that unifies all sciences  

In the graph, 2 invariances of Absolute relativity, above, the invariance of topological forms and actions that create the complementary systems of energy and information, e xi of the Universe, and the invariance of scale between a relative past of null information and a relative future of more information than the present point of view of the human observer:                            

Humans exist in a relative present scale between relative past scales of lesser information and future scales of more complex eusocial form.

In the graph, 2 key structures of Absolute relativity:                                 

– In the upper graph, the units of all the scales are complementary systems with a field/body of energy and a head/particle of information, which gather in social networks as cells-units of a higher scale, till reaching the whole Universe, whose complementary systems are details that mirror the elements of the ‘Generator Equation’ E<=> Ti, ‘generates an enormous number of entities with a cyclical, informative particle/head and an energetic/reproductive body/field. In that regard the Generator equation as all equations is a formal, synoptic mirror of the reality it describes. Yet we contend that all systems of the Universe to be ‘real’ must obey the complementarity principle and be made of an informative system that processes information and guides an energetic system.

     – Below the scales of discontinuous space-time, evolve form, in/form/ation from the absolute past into the future through the human present-scale.

Since the foundational congress at Macy’s for 50 years General Systems scientists have searched for the laws that unify all sciences under the tenants of organicism with little success. This is due in part to the conceptual difficulty of finding those laws and the advances needed to create the proper mathematical and logical formalism to study them.

Those basic mathematical, conceptual and logical advances are studied in the first part of this paper. While the experimental examples occupy the second part.

Yet there is a deeper problem to find the laws of GST: the existence of a series of ‘dogmas’ of science, which are neither proved no right and must be corrected harmonize all those sciences. This of course means the change of paradigm in many disciplines, which as per Kuhn is always an impossible task as people memorized the beliefs of the previous paradigm.

It is also necessary to find a common jargon, which scientists understand and can be applied to all those sciences, which in this text, unlike previous conferences (1), will be mainly mathematical and physical, as we are dealing with the process of emergence of the laws of all systems, which first appeared in mathematical space-time and then in fields of energy forces and informative particles (where energy is defined as ‘space with motion’ and time as information in motion, in-form-ation, forms-in-action).

All those tasks are ‘a priori’ steps before the laws common to all sciences are found and generalized. So we shall deal with errors of science regarding time first (lineal time vs. cyclical time, duration vs. frequency, single space-time continuum vs. multiple fractal cycles of time, single entropy arrow of future time vs. dual arrows of energy and information, which together create the Universe) etc.

And so part of this lesson requires to upgrade those ‘dogmas’ of science and define properly its concepts. We shall only deal with the main dogmas of time and space physics upgrading them to a theory of multiple, relational space-times, which was first introduced by Leibniz and today the leading theoretical physicists recognize as the closest theory of reality even if as Einstein put it, ‘Leibniz is probably right but that means to build up again the entire field of physics from scratch’

What we can and must keep of that building are the fundamental principles of relativity and quantum physics, the concept of invariance and actions.

Since they turn out to be the ‘transcendental concepts’ that emerge in all scales. In all of them we shall see how the entities of each scale repeat the same actions of energy and time, which evolve in form and quantity but not in quality.

Invariance is the key to the stability of the Universe, which repeats all forms and goes through patterns and self-similar processes thanks to the invariances that preserve the forms of energy and information, the motions and translation and rotations, the frequencies, functions and actions of reality.

The invariances of the Universe thus become the ‘reference’ frames, the ‘attractors’ if we were to use complexity jargons, which are the steps of a program of creation and destruction of self-similar forms, which will be eternal.

The most important of those invariances will turn to be that of actions, made of motions and forms, which resume all other invariances, and give birth to the ‘generator equation’ of the Universe.

In brief, the Universe is made of an infinite number of ‘knots of time actions’, of entities which trace cycles with motion, but also with a goal and purpose: to absorb energy, information and reproduce both in other regions of space-time. Those 3 basic actions are common to all entities, from the smallest quarks and electrons that reproduce self-similar particles to the biggest galaxies, whose black holes catalyze the formation of new galaxies and stars.  The fourth action though, social evolution in herds and organisms, is the less understood and most important because it creates the social scales of the ‘5th dimension’ from past to future.

And we shall see how the fact that all scales of growing social evolution complexity can still relate to each other, from the simplest atom to the biggest planet, from the simplest hormone to the biggest organism.

So invariances allow the Universe to be stable and create at the same time actions and motions, in a perfect balance between energy and form.

But to fully understand this we have to break the dogmas and errors of science and that is the biggest wall I have always found whenever I tried to upgrade a ‘classic scientist’. And the biggest of those errors concern the understanding of the ‘arrows of future’, the choice of ‘future motions’ any entity creating that future can produce. So far science, influenced by physicists only recognize entropy, here defined as the arrow of motion, of energy. But the arrow of creation of form, of social evolution of parts into wholes, of points into networks is as real and fundamental, even if its properties are opposite, to that of entropy. Thus the Universe constantly switches between form and motion, stop and go, particle and wave. There is not a single entropy arrow but infinite beings, which perform cycles of time that can be entropic, creating disorder or negantropic, in/form/ative, creating order.


Philosophical meaning of absolute relativity and its fractal scales.

Since the beginning of science our quest for knowledge has shown humans to be irrelevant in the cosmic scale. First Copernicus dethroned man from the center of the Universe. Then Darwin lowered him to the lineage of apes. Then Relativity and quantum theory made us doubt of our senses, motions and measures, which were uncertain and relative.

Thus, while popular culture has boasted the arrogance of mankind, till the present paroxysm of selfish ego-trips, where each human under the propaganda of anthropomorphic religions, consumerism, advertising, nationalism and audiovisual ‘cartoon’ heroes, thinks entitled to all, the supreme race of the Universe, with a manifest destiny, etc. etc. science has advanced in the opposite direction, objectively putting at face value mankind, which turned out to be just another complementary species of energy and information, like everything else in the Universe.

Since those scales seem to have no limit nor our scale of size is special, despite the fact that subjectively we think we occupy the center of those scales, as we thought the Earth to be the center of the Universe.

Entropy and chirality

A key element of Absolute Relativity and the fifth dimension is the new meaning of entropy related to a fundamental property of the Universe, its ‘chirality’ or different orientation, when we move from a relative past, lesser evolved scale into a more complex informative one. This motion, which can be considered a motion between scales (spatial perception) or a motion in ‘Absolute Time’ (temporal perception), is not commutative. It is not the same going upwards than downwards in the fractal scales of the Universe and this is perceived in science either as chirality or entropy (each scale & science has crafted their own jargon for self-similar phenomena). Thus:

–  The laws of entropy are chiral, irreversible, in the sense that they favor one of the directions of order, from the smaller i-1 scales to the upper i scales. Since he macro-scale – for example the pales of Joulot’s machine – have a 100% efficiency converting its motion into motion at molecular scale, while in the other direction the efficiency is never 100%.

This is really the meaning of entropy, which can only be fully understood after the realization that the different scales of space-time are not in the same continuum. There are discontinuums between the wholes and the part, which must be bridged through systems that transfer energy and information between them, and those transference are not commutative.

And this is why in any system the ‘upper scales’ control the lower scales with massive changes in their parameters of energy and information, which are transmitted to the lower scales. While the lower scales are at disadvantage, when they want to control the upper scales, as the ‘momentum’ or combined exi force of the microcosms does not transcend with the same efficiency.  And this applies to all systems, from top predators of bigger size that eat many smaller ones of bigger combined mass (whales eating krills) to the power the upper social castes that control their lower ‘energy classes’ with languages of information (money, laws) and energy (weapons), while the r=evolutions of the energy classes are often ‘disordered’ motions, as those of heat.

The fact that information from the upper to the lower scales, from the whole to the group, is 100%, efficient, while in the other direction from micro-cosmos to macrocosms is NOT, is the ultimate reason why those upper scales can exist, somehow ‘parasiting’ the energy of the lower ones.

– The second correction introduced on the laws of entropy by the scalar universe is also fundamental and explains why the Universe is immortal and will never die. Since the laws of entropy were defined only for one scale, that of electromagnetic, light-space, which is an ‘energetic force’ that expands the Universe.

The 2nd law: entropy is a local property of the light membrane but gravitation is an informative force that restores the order of the immortal cosmos, since it has only an order/informative, implosive, attractive arrow.

Thus the Universe neither grows nor it shrinks. Gravitation, which dominates galactic vortices implodes energy into mass and electromagnetism expands mass into energy: E=Mc2+M=E/c2 becomes then a zero sum of implosions and explosions, beats of EóI, which together balance the total Universe.

Thus the idea of an ever expansive, dying universe is only the generalization of the overused second law of thermodynamics.

The black hole ultimately restores the balance by absorbing our electromagnetic membrane and creating mass with it, which we see ejected on the polar bi-jets of the whole.

The impossibility of a machine of continuous movement only applies to heat processes that include the ‘molecular parameter’ of temperature.

Though the expansion of physics to include the laws of scales is much wider we shall leave the theme here, as those are the best known invariances and scales studied by classic science.

Information dominates energy.

Other form to consider the quirality of the scales of reality is the dominance of informative networks over energetic ones.

Information dominates energy because informative ‘networks’ ∏ are stronger than mere, herds, ∑, which are connected only in the evident, i-plane of existence, while they perform their arrow. Herds follow the search for an arrow – normally energy, sometimes information. But when information is what it is transferred, herds tend to evolve in networks in which there are causal memories that chain the system to other systems, neuronal networks of white matter in neurons and brains, electromagnetic cables in machines of information, etc. So we write:

∑i=∏, where i is the number of scales across which the network of information exists and controls with its bits and networks. Thus we write the equation of a complex organism as:

∑Ei<=>∏Ti±1= ∑ | x ∑i±1 O

The second notation is visual, geometric, as the universe is indeed a game of topologies in action, where the lineal, planar form of energy limbs/fields are ordered internally by mixed fields, X, guided by an informative head of bits of information that form both an internal language of control of the body/field and an external sensorial absorption of external information.

The invariance of momentum across scales.

Let us consider now the most important invariances of physics, the invariances of momentum, which is the product of two relative parameters of energy/space, the speed of the system, v, plus its informative/time clocks, the mass or charge of the system, m,q. Those quantities are not always conserved, as in the case of accelerations close to light speed (Lorentz Transformations). Yet its product, the momentum is not conserved, and when the momentum is no longer conserved (emission of a neutrino) is because the system is broken and the particle transformed in other particle or dissolved.

Thus the relativity of motion vs. form of all systems is balanced by the invariance of its product, m x v or momentum.

When we apply the concept of invariance with rigor, however we must consider the i±1 scales that ‘surround’ the i-system as the ‘domain of the event’. For example, in the previous example, the neutrino is not perceived in the light space-time membrane in which we exist, so it will probably carry energy and information into the gravitational membrane in which we are included. But the total i±1 scales will keep the total invariance.

A glimpse to the laws of invariance between 3        i±1 scales.

So what is the meaning of the Lorentz Transformations and self-similar processes in which the E and I parameters change?

Obviously an action that transcends or descends a certain i-system into its lower i-1 scale, with faster time-speed and smaller spatial-distances or an upper i+1 scale, with slower time-speed and bigger spatial distances (hence taking longer to close a cycle). Yet the product of both is constant, reason why forms can transcend or descend scales maintaining the invariance of momentum, which is the main parameter of survival.

ExI=K, represents the power of a system. Thus because their total volume remains invariant to changes of scale, the top predator species with maximal momentum cannot extinguish all the species of an inferior scale.

Absolute Relativity shows that in a fractal Universe charges and masses are self-similar vortices, clocks of time that carry a self-similar amount of information, (as Lorentz contractions accelerate the information processed in smaller space-scales). So all scales are relatively equal in its volume of energy and information:

[∑(ExI)i=n = ∑(ExI)i=x] for any relative value of x and n

Which means the total volume of ‘functions of existence’ of an scale is approximately equal to the volume of the upper and lower scales. There are though small differences, which respond to the laws of entropy that are also slightly changed when we consider the i±1, ternary scales in which entropy processes take place and latter we shall study in more detail.

Further on those laws are kept for all the invariances studied here, time-frequency, energy-motion, actions and forms across all the scales. For example, in the biological realm, if we compare the two main animal scales of size and speed, the human and ant scales, it turns out that those invariances are kept for the two most powerful top predator, social species, the ant and the man: the weight mass of all ants equals that of all humans, even if the ants are much smaller. Hence they have a faster time speed of information processing/perception; but to keep the invariance of ‘time frequency’, they must live shorter. And in fact given the ‘decametric’ scale of most i±1 systems, the longest living ant lives 7 years, but since insects process information 10 times faster than we do – reason why you never catch a flight – she lives 7 x10 years, the life of a human being.

All clocks of time measure the same cycle, the larger cycles go slower, the slower cycles are more extended in time. As in the sci-fi movie, the shrinking man, reality shrinks but accelerates. Vortices of mass accelerate to the c-speed limit of the event horizon of a black hole, which is extremely tiny.

Definition of the Universe in terms of the 5 invariances.

We conclude from the existence of 5 invariances, energy, form, action, scale and frequency that:

‘The Universe is a system of networks of knots of actions of energy and time, perceived as forms and motions. Beings perform cyclical discontinuous actions as they switch between feeding, perceiving, reproducing and acting in social networks, in a sequential order which is the absolute invariance of the game – the life and death generational cycle… in which  the game is preserved…

The cycle is formalized by a single function, max. E x I, the function of existence,, whose developments show the selection, extinction, recreation, fusion and fission of all those cycles and beings.’

Recap. The fifth dimension organizes space-time cycles into more complex structures, keeping a balance in the product of the energy and information of the Universe, exi=k. The fractal structure of space-time is revealed through the 5th dimension, which changes our view of the Universe and corrects many errors of science, acquired using only a space-time continuum with only 4 dimensions, 3 of space and one of time. The fifth dimension from a logic perspective is related to the evolution of form and its social structures.


The main discovery of quantum physics was the understanding that the Universe was not made of substances but of motions called actions that combined energy and time. So from a quantum particle to a human that states ‘I don’t have time or energy to do this’, we find those two ‘actions’ to be the essence of all realities. We are all ‘knots’ of actions of energy and time. And the next step is to define properly those parameters, classify all possible Universal actions, find its ‘functions and forms’ and systematize all that knowledge in a series of basic laws that all physical, biological and sociological systems follow. Let us then describe those actions, motions and forms in its simplest terms, departing from the fact that all what exists is a complementary system of actions of energy and time.

The Universe is made of actions of energy and time, of motions with form, of in-form-actions, of information. So we say we don’t have energy and time to do something, as we are also made of such actions.

Physicists have explored mainly the mathematical formalism of those actions in the realm of quantum particles, but we want to expand the concept to all the systems of the Universe.

And the main question we want to resolve is the types of quantum actions that exist in all those scales.

Beings constantly create actions of energy and time. What you see are knots of such cyclical actions… fabricating time. What we see are the trajectories of beings performing in an alternately causal way their cycles of time. One of the most common cycles is to have a p.o.v. becoming a focus of a force, which acts as its source of energy and information. A first paradox of Galileo happens here, as we can perceive the point as static and feeding, moving along the field of energy and so we can establish a static or dynamic analysis. Those points then ill feed along that path and a certain moment satisfied that action will try to fulfill others, and in that switching on and off actions will seem to disappear and new, different trajectories motivated for another action appear. If we see densely packed in time and space those actions they will be sequential and those causal sequences are the stuff that latter (paradox of Galileo) seen as a package of space-time or organism, are the reality we see in its infinite fields.

The why of the Universe turned out to be rather simple and biological, more than physical, even if it was a discovery that starts in physics with Planck’s realization that the simplest Unit of reality is NOT a substance but a cyclical action of energy and time. Quantum and cyclical are treated as synonymous, a quantum is a form that we might perceive as fixed and substance but it is really nothing but a morphological motion, traced by a being, that in the specific scale Planck studied, we could hardly see, the light-space. But all what that being did were actions of energy and time.

But can build the Universe departing of those two primary substances or ‘arrows of the Universe’? Yes we can. And that is what I did back in the 90s. The concepts are easy, if you are able to transcend your memetic imprinting and ignore Mr. Planck’s desperado dictum when nobody listened to his astounding discovery that we were made not of substances but actions and hence motions (‘for a new paradigm to be imposed all those who learned the previous paradigm must die’).

So try to follow me with a ‘Tabula Rassa’. You have two entities, energy and time, and they have motion, so they create actions. The simplest combination is called an h-Planck constant. That gives us a first ‘being’. Now forget your abstract, earlier Hegelian imprinting (this you might not know, but history of science tells us earlier German thinkers were idealist as philosophers of science and did not consider the Universe made of ‘realities’ but of ‘mathematical probabilities’). Think rational. h-Plancks are ‘real’, the simplest bricks of the Universe, and they are made of energy and time. In fact you perceive light, when you stop seeing light you stop seeing the Universe of space-time.

Therefore the space-time Universe we perceive is made of actions of light of energy and time. And physicists have discovered that indeed the vacuum is made of energy, which moves and change in time. But we said the Universe of space-time instead of the Universe of energy and time. Space has become energy. And indeed, space and energy are two ways of seeing the same thing.  Then we come to the other term Time…. But we use in many sciences instead of space and time, energy and information, so time and information, ‘form-in-action’, form must be related. And yet we use clocks of time, cyclical forms to measure time. All what exists is made of space-time, in abstract, of energy and information, self-similar terms.

Now when you say ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this’, it is obvious that subconsciously you know the two substances of what you are made, energy and time and you are right. Because what you are, what we shall describe in this book in great detail is how you ‘become’ yourself, departing from the two primary substances of the Universe, energy and time, which together form an action, the basic unit of reality.

So Duality deals with that fact, and extracts the laws of energy and information. Now, think again, what else can be there? The simplest thing is to combine energy and information, and you get a 3rd entity. This combination e x i, or e x t, if you want to use Quantum or Einstein’s notation, turns out to be the essential equations of physics. So we are on the good path.

Thus now we have 3 arrows, energy, information and exi, that we shall call the arrow of reproduction or creation, as it creates a third entity, one which is made of two substances, and turns to be an ‘action’.

What else can we find there? Since there are many bites of energy and bits of information, we can combine them, and then we find the 4th arrow:

∑ e x i

This equation, which the reader should observe includes all the others, is what I have called the Generator equation of all the entities of energy and information or space and time of the Universe. And from that simplest equation and the interaction of its two ‘simple arrows’ or motions, we create its two complex forms, actions and societies. And this, my friend is all what we shall need to explain you all what exists and more… what you don’t see but it exists also in other fractal scale of reality.

So now it is clear what it is the game of existence, the Universe: a game of relative organisms, of each scale of reality, performing externally in an ecosystem, its space-time, cyclical actions, switching among its tasks of energy feeding, informative perceiving, reproducing and keep in harmony with the self-similar points of its energetic, informative and reproductive social networks. We exist in a series of parallel games of feeding, perceiving, evolving and reproducing. All of us can be perceived externally as ‘points of view’, Non-Euclidean points, playing this geometric and biological, existential game:

We are all knots of discontinuous=quantum, cyclical actions of energy and time. Since the Universe is continuously differentiable during the cycles of time their beings perform, but when the p.o.v. switches its action, it has a point of discontinuity, as the system changes its trajectory and goal towards a new action. And then again will return to its feeding, perceiving or reproductive or social action. Thus actions are quantum actions, as the modular being switches between the. And we see this process is the trace of those cyclical actions that ‘draw’ the 4 dimensional space-time universe.

If actions were all of a certain type, the Universe and all its species would be far more continuous, always repeating the same cycle. This is not the case as all of them switch between 4 possible cycles with different frequencies and forms, and as they switch they abruptly change direction, extinguish a cycle and start one, and then return to the same type of cycle, creating the discontinuous forms of the Universe.

Relationships between the simplex and complex arrows.

The dualities between external, spatial and informative, simplex forces/ actions and complex, internal forces/actions/networks create a series of patterns and synchronicities that are repeated in all systems. The simplest relationship is one of causality between the simplex and complex arrows:

∆ Energy->Reproduction and ∆ In/Form/ation->Social evolution through a common language.

Complex reproduction requires a great deal of energy to be achieved, so for example women cannot have children without a proportion of body fat, and most cells do not undergo mitosis without a cytoplasmic growth. So reproduction is the complex arrow of energy and we observe many causal relationships and ‘cycles’ of the type:  E->Re. On the other hand social evolution depends of a language of information that the different ‘cellular elements’ understand. Thus social evolution is the complex arrow of information and we shall also observe many relationships of the type:  ∆i-> ∑ e x I.

Further on the 4th social arrow creates stronger top predators, either herds (loose groups of self-similar organisms of the same type) or organisms proper (more connected systems that organize 3 sub-systems, heads, bodies and limbs, specialized in information or formal structure, reproduction and energy, all of them connected by a 4 system, the linguistic system that organizes them all).

And this reduces all actions perceived as discontinuous cycles of time in which a particle comes to a point in which it absorbs or emits different types of energy and information, to the 3+∑ combinations of them: energy feeding, information processing, reproduction of both, exi, and social organization of self-similar beings, ∑exi.

So we define any entity of existence as a knot of the 4 quantum actions it performs in its cycles of space-time.

To do so the point must perceive and gauge. If it is an electron it will gauge and move to capture energy to structure its form (2nd quantum number) and it will use a language of information to evolve socially (magnetic number). Points thus are moved by the need to perform their 4 cycles of existence, a desire to acquire more energy and form which they better achieve in networks, with the flexibility of herd hunting and network thinking. But in each scale of reality there is a rational point of view calculating its strategies to get more energy and form.

That we have no free will but we have will is the deepest consequence of stating that all points of view search for its 3+1 actions or ‘dimensions’ of existence, its energy, informative, reproductive and social arrows.

But what means to measure time through the internal frequencies of reproduction of information of an entity of the Universe? What is the meaning of those cycles, what events of frequency we measure?

The answer is actions. We measure the frequency of actions of particles of existence that trace certain geodesics as non-Euclidean points of time, travelling through a 6-dimensinal non-Euclidean Universe, switching between those cycles with patterns that create frequencies, waves of time, of 4 type of ‘energetic actions’.

And we will return to that. Because it is the second invariance of the Universe. All its entities follow 4 quantum numbers or basic frequencies between its actions of energy and time.

The invariances of frequencies of time, I, and actions of time, exi, are in that sense the key invariances to interpret properly in physical and biological sciences the meaning of time cycles, and frequencies. What we observe in the Universe are particles of many scales, which perform trajectories in which a particle will feed on energy or information and the frequency of those actions in which there is absorption or energy or imprinting of information appears to us as information over the entity. Information thus become encoded in the trajectories of entities that with a given frequency different for each species absorbs energy and information or recombines it, exi, emitting a self-similar form. The Universe of motions of time is in that sense a harmony of 4 basic frequencies, actions.


Why particles of existence turn into cycles? The answer is vital: to make certain actions that ensure the survival of its systems of energy and information. Non-Euclidean points are points of view that gauge information and move their complementary body with a will, seeking for more energy and information and reproduction, seeking for an organic will to repeat their cycles and motions. And this will make the point a mind, Atman or soul – a perceptive point of view that absorbs information and moves its body accordingly after ‘thinking’ the information to cater its will.

All systems perform 4 actions to survive that define a simple program of ‘existence’, which all species of energy and information follow

The deduction of the program is simple. First, all what exist in time is an event, called an action, made by a complementary system of energy and information. Hence all actions have at most 2 components, energy and form, exi=k or exT=k (depending on which self-similar concept you choose information or time). Further on there are many quantic actions performed by many systems. So all what we can do is 4 type of actions that we shall call ‘arrows or motions of time’:

Those arrows or actions performed by complementary bodies/fields of energy and heads/particles of information to last in time and space will be:

–     ∆E:  Systems feed on energy for their bodies/fields.

–     ∆I:   They absorb information for their heads/particles.

–      Exi:  They act combining both, often to reproduce the entity in other zone of space and time to survive after death. While some systems become reproduced by an external catalyzer, enzyme or ‘enzyman: human enzyme’ – machines).

–     ∑ e x I=Ii+1. They evolve socially in more complex networks that survive longer in time and space.

The 4 arrows are ‘necessary’ for any complementary system of energy and information to exist. As any system will die if it doesn’t replenish its energy and information, or reproduce before death.


We can connect the 4 arrows/actions of time as a causal sequence: beings perceive and search for information to feed, and when they feed enough they reproduce, and when they reproduce a lot, they organize in social groups: E->I -> exi (Reproduction) ∑ exi.

These beats of existence are the key to explain the evolutionary patterns of all systems, from the creation of the Universe as a whole, to the creation of life, to the science of morphogenesis and evol>devol to history and economics and the creation of its super-organisms. Of all those temporal sequences the most important is the life/death cycle:

In the graph, the 4 arrows of space-time have in most species a clear order in time:

– +1: Birth: We are born as a seed of information that:

-Max. Energy: The being goes through an energetic youth of fast motions, in which the energetic limbs and external sensorial membrane dominates.

-E=I: Balances energy and information in a mature, reproductive age, in which the internal, topological, reproductive system dominates.

– Max. Information: Till it warps all its energy into form, in the 3rd age in which the central, hyperbolic, informative brain/particle singularity is dominant. This age ends in:

– -1: Death: Exploding back into energy, erasing its information in the process of death.

The long arrow from energy to information of ‘life’ E->I and its local short reversal from information to energy or ‘death’, I->E, becomes the cycle of existence and extinction of all complex systems of reality, from humans to matter (energy=gas state, liquid= reproductive state, solid=informative state), to the Universe itself from the big bang to the steady state to the Gödel’s vortex, described by the 3 solutions to Einstein equations, which must be ordered in time. In the next graph, we see some examples:

In the graph, most systems follow the ternary principle and have an energetic, informative & reproductive system. Such ternary systems follow the 3 symmetries of the complex Universe: the 3 ages in time of the system, dominated each one by a network (the energetic youth, reproductive maturity and informative, 3rd age), the 3 topologies in space that define those networks (hyperbolic, informative center; planar or spherical, energetic limbs and membranes and toroid, cyclical, reproductive organs); and co-exist 3 scales of existence – the cellular, organic and social scale, in which the organism becomes a unit of the next scale of reality. So the study of systems through its dualities and its 3 symmetries of spatial form, temporal ages and scalar size, is the essence of the ternary method that we shall follow in this work to classify all physical species and study its evolution.

Those ternary ages and topologies are the foundations of a theory of multiple spaces and times, extended through several scales of reality, whose origin can be traced to the work of Leibniz on relational, multiple time cycles and vital spaces, but now truly acquire thanks to systems sciences all its solving power. Since we classify all space forms and time events in 3 topologies/ages that put together in social networks, create new (i+1) organic systems.

Thus the duality of energy and information and the ternary method is the key system used to resolve and reorganize the elements of physics, from the 3 ages of creation of matter (energetic gas, reproductive liquid and informative solid) to the study of particles and its social forms (the 3 families of increasing mass-information, the duality proton/neutron, quark/electron, strong/weak forces, gravitational/ electromagnetic membrane; the 3 ages of the Universe equivalent to the 3 solutions to Einstein’s equations – which are phases of evolution in time of the Universe that goes from a big-bang age, through a steady state into a Godelian vortex.

Topologic evolution: 3 ages of species.

Perhaps one of the strongest proofs of the invariance of time frequencies of actions and its causal orders and ages is the ‘emergence’ of the fundamental ‘pattern’ of frequencies – the life/death cycle – in the next scale of life, the scale of evolution. Since evolution repeats the patterns of the life-death cycle and its 3 ages at the longer scale of species, where ‘cells become individuals’: information (seed)->Energy(youth)->Reproduction (Exi)->Information (3rd age)->Big-bang of energy (death)

The process of evolution of species is equivalent to the 3±st ages of individuals with a twist: death is not the only ‘solution’ to the cycle, but the duality of ∂-disintegration or ∫-integration of a social group (in the case of life a cellular group), which defines the life/death cycle gives two choices to some ‘top predator’ informative species: After its 3 horizons or evolutionary ages the species might become extinct or transcend into a super-organism.

 In all space-time scales species follow a future arrow towards more information, which increases in 3 horizons and finally evolves individuals into societies, herds and macro-organisms, related by a common language/network of information.

In the graph, the seminal, 1st species packs a lot of information in minimal space: It is the Worm Hole, the chip, the 1st bilateral animal2, the 1st mammal, the horse and the 1st Homo Sapiens, which seem to have evolved from a dwarf ancestor, which first discovered technology and had a dwarf brain, albeit with an evolved morphology similar to that of the Homo Sapiens: the Homo Floresiensis3.

Then the new ‘highly informative’ top predator follows in its evolution a plan of dimensional evolution that transforms species with a high content of energy into species with a high content of information through 3±st horizons, self-similar to the ages of an individual organism. Since species are, in fact, macro-organisms in which each cell is an individual of the species.

-First in its ‘energetic youth’, the species grows in size as horses, humans, bilateral animals or black holes do.

-Then the species suffers a reproductive radiation colonizing new ecosystems.

-Next the species suffers a speciation, according the ternary principle into 3 subspecies, one dominant in energy, another in information and a 3rd one balanced in both parameters.

– Finally, a new top predator extinguishes the species or the informative one evolves into social organisms of different complexity, stronger than the individual and survives.

Further on, evolution, as the analysis of the complex plan of ‘speciation’ shows, has two paths: social evolution of ‘external’ energetic bodies (the herd-state, of lesser efficiency and higher spatial extension) and social evolution of ‘internal’ informative organs.

In cells, this give birth to the two main arrows of cellular evolution: muscles, single cytoplasmic cells with multiple nuclei; and neurons single, dense nuclei with multiple cytoplasmic branches (dendrites).

In Physical systems to ‘quark condensates’ (neutron and black hole stars) vs. molecular, external fusion.

Finally in the evolution of species, we have also the causal rhythms between the dominance of each arrow, similar to the ‘ages’ of life, as a species is the life of a ‘cellular’ parental father, reproduced into multiple individuals that will become extinguished, often substituted by a son-species (Oedipus paradox). And the rhythm parallel to that of climatic change is simple:

Small informative seed (first small species-fetus)-> Energy feeding (growth) -> The young age of the species/individual shows a growth in size -> Reproductive/radiating age-> follows by a reproductive expansion of the species as a new ‘top predator’, while the individual gives birth to an offspring-> Informative age/diversification of the species -> extinction/death & survival of the son species.

This simple scheme applies to the analysis of the ‘frozen horizons’ of the big-bang and the particles created; to the evolution of species, which appear in the fossil record small in size (1st bilateral vernanimacula, 1st modern mammal (shrewd), 1st horse, 1st human with technological/speech skills (Homo floresiensis?), first ‘self-reproductive machine’ (chipped nano-bacteria?)…

Recap. The simple, morphological plan of evolution that each fractal species of the Universe repeats is caused by the fact that there are only 2±1 forms in the Universe, lineal energy and cyclical information and i=ts reproductive, body combination. So only 3 new types of species can be created, one with more energy, one with more information and one that reproduces both.

  Max. Energy=past x Information-future = Present-reproduction..

Time dimensions have a much deeper meaning that its mere flow. Conceptually they relate to ‘energy’ (past), information (future) and repetition or reproduction. The concept is obvious: Energy has no form and so it must appear ‘before’ information, form-in-action, appears. Further on, present in a dynamic universe is the perception of a self-repetitive action or knot of actions. Thus reproduction, the creation of present is the fundamental way of inventing the future, making time a dynamic process. In the graph, reproductive waves of present-existences in all the scales of reality. The future is thus webbed with a biological program of constant reproduction, fight between species and final selection. And this translates to the jargon of all sciences, through concepts such as ‘unstable particles’, or ‘extinct mutations’… The Universe thus invent ‘many futures’ by fractal reproduction of information, forms, which then are selected into a single path of future. Biology is thus a key element for understanding the sixth dimension. And this can be resumed in a basic equation: Past (energy) imprinted x Future Information = present beings, of which certain ones (Max. E x I) will be selected…

Let us now consider a more complex application of those previous laws of all systems: the meaning of past, present and future, which is a consequence of the causal order between those arrows:

Perception->Energetic feeding->Reproduction->Linguistic, social evolution.

In turn that order defines in a longer time-span/scale of existence the causal order of a life/death cycle:

Informative seed->Youth->Reproductive maturity->Informative 3rd age and death…

That order defines in a longer time-span, the ages of a species, which is born as a small, more evolved form that -> Grows in size -> Radiates and expands as a new predator -> Diversifies informatively in multiple species -> evolves socially in a complex superorganism (ant hills, human societies) or become extinguished by new, more evolved, often ‘son’ species (Oedipus paradox.)

When we combine those ;aws we can define the 3 dimensions of time, the relative informative future as systems become warped and evolve in its 3rd, informative age; the relative past of formless energy, and youth, and the relative present of iteration-reproduction that seems never to change. And we shall see that this is indeed what all systems do in higher measure.

Thus once more we see that not only absolute time is an integrative concept of many time cycles, but the concepts of past, present and future are also relative perceptions in a Universe in which the sum of all life, informative arrows masterminded by these Points of View, and energetic, devolving, simplifying past arrows of entropic motions become a relative present, eternal reality of multiple systems that reproduce iterations of themselves.  And latter we shall see they do so through ‘fractal self-generating, feed-back equations of information’ of which the synoptic one that resumes all of them is E<=>I.

Reproductive, Fractal differentiation. Evolutionary processes. Basic Laws.

Finally, another key element of all systems is the restrictions and favored paths of reproduction and mutation or evolution of form. Because there are only 3 functional forms in a 4-dimensional universe (with 3 dimensions of form or space and one complex dimension of motion or time), morphological evolution is not random in choice but guided by the limits of 3 basic topologies, which will be expressed by morphological mutation: either an energetic membrane, toroid body-organ or warped, linguistic mind will evolve positively or negatively in their parameters, which is often achieved changing the ‘speed’ of time of the process(so for example in human apes the brain bones grow faster than the chin, which grows faster in gorillas, and this change in an essential time parameter determines a functional change in form).

Thus while the variations might seem endless, in fact evolution is restricted by the limits of parameters of form and function, spatial changes in 3 dimensions and temporal parameters – the main tool for establishing those differentiations of a species into either + or – informative, reproductive or energetic growth and evolution.

A ternary process of ‘fractal differentiation’ is the key to understand the ‘speed’ and accuracy of evolutionary development:  As a system evolves the 3 ‘diffeomorphic=local’ coordinates of the system – the top (information) – bottom axis, the back-front axis of motion, and the wide axis of structural form and reproductive storage, which are perpendicular to each other, are conserved.

The ‘emergence’ of the properties of previous scales defines this way the elements of the next scale.

They become in the electronic scale the ‘right hand rule’ between electric and magnetic fields; in carbohydrates, the key to understand the 3-dimensional warping of DNA and proteins according to the different positions of its C-formal, O-energetic and N-informative parts. It will be then the ‘3 first genetic’ morphologies imprinted in the cells, with the ‘animal’ pole on top, from where the informative neuronal plate will develop. Then the fetus will define the anteroposterior axis of energetic motion and finally the wide-bilateral, reproductive axis of accumulation of cells.

Ternary principle in space and time:

Finally a fundamental symmetry that we shall consider latter in more detail is that between the 3 forms, of space and the 3 dimensions of time, past-youth, present-maturity and informative, 3rd age, as those topologies and its functions dominate in each age of time of the life/death cycle of the being, which goes from the causal, first element, the energetic, external sphere into the 3rd causal element, the center of information that dominates the 3rd age.

The actions of beings have a temporal order. Ternary ages and life/death cycles.

The dominant action any being performs is reproduction, exi=k. It is the ‘leit motiv’ of reality that happens when e=I. And so the ‘function of existence’, ∑ e x I, is maximized.

Reproduction and combination in a point of balance of e and I, that produces a quantum wave of self-similar seeds in a lower plane of existence, i-1 happens in all scale and systems in the same manner.

Reproduction follows the same causal processes in any scale: two self-similar species with ‘opposite’ energy-information coordinates (the definition of ‘gender’), in the case of particles, with opposite spin, produce a ‘seminal/cellular sub-particle’, gluons in quarks as in the previous image or photons in electrons. And when the two sub-particles merge their form and energy, they reproduce a ‘shower’ of new electrons or quarks. Thus the process is the same than in human beings and we can generalize the process for any system of any scale of the universe, with the notation of general systems as:

Reproductive action (any scale): exI (female) <=> Exi (male): exIi-1  x Exii-1 = ∑ e x i.

So quarks reproduce other quarks colliding gluons as the previous graph shows and electrons colliding photons of higher energy, and the black holes of central galaxies emit jets of dense matter and cells, molecules of DNA.

In that sense, as the increasingly detailed analysis of gluons and electromagnetic flows show, we can talk of those ‘flows’ as micro-networks, similar to the nervous, endocrine and blood systems in our more complex super-organisms. And so the strong and electromagnetic forces do act in several scales, as it happens with the blood system that carries not only energy but also hormones – information… Within the structure of the atom we could consider the existence also of 3 physiological networks that correspond to the inner energetic system (electromagnetism), informative system and reproductive systems. And a fourth external ‘force’ that corresponds to the light we perceive but do NOT circulate inside us (the gravitational force).

Actions are processes with an increasing duration in time such as:

Informative action < Energetic action < Reproductive action < Social action.

And vice versa, given the opposition of properties between time and space, their range diminishes. This is the law of diminishing range of the forces that mediate those actions.


APPENDIX Main symbols of T.Œ:

¬Æ: Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean, i-logic mathematics (Formal language of T.Œ).

Tƒ, temporal clock, informative time (its spatial, static view)

Spe, Spatial entropy, past.

>: informative flow that diminishes size in space and accelerates clocks in time

<: kinetic energy flow that increases speed in space or entropic flow that enlarges the being in space and diminishes its speed in time

≈ reproductive flow that maintains unchanged the being at constant speed in space and reproductive sped in time.

Λ: emergence into a larger scale of the 5th dimension

∨: devolution to a lower plane of the 5th dimension.

∑: reproduction in space or herd loosely connected in limbs/fields

∏: reproduction of networks across several scales of the 5th dimension or full-connected heads/particles.

∆±1; plane of the 5th dimension (sometimes ∆±1, in old texts where i was used as index)

∆a, accelerated motions (first action of negative emission of energy), ∆e, energy feeding, second action of positive absorption of kinetic energy-entropy, ∆œ, iterative communicative reproduction, of part (mind languages) or whole (full reproduction), ∆ï: absorption of information to perceive, ∆u: evolution of a parts into Universals

œ∆-1: action or cell, fractal finitesimal of the whole in time or space; Œ, whole, U, Universal World.

Those simple symbols suffice to explain the structure and transformations of ternary 5D space-time systems, departing from its ‘spatial simultaneous structure’, its 3 time ages and its 3 co-existing organic scales:

∆-1(cellular/atomic scale)>∆:organic-thermodynamic scale>∆+1: social, cosmic scale:

Se(Spatial toroid limbs-fields)≤ST (Hyperbolic body-waves)≤Tif (head-particles of information)≈

Se (young, past entropic age>ST: adult, present, iterative age > Tƒ: old informative, future age:

∆-1>∆>∆+1 (5D scales)≈ Se≤ST≤Tƒ (space organs) ≈ Sp≥Ts≥Tƒ (time ages)

Let us consider this huge overhauling of our languages of thought due to the…


‘A new theory should reproduce the results of older well-established theories (which become limiting cases) in those domains where the old theories work.’ Wiki, Correspondence Principle

‘Simplex 4D physics is a case of 5D Fractal space & cyclical time, limited to a single, mechanical time clock and a single ∆-scale of space.’ L.S.

T.œ: A Theory of the Organic Everything

So as you can see in this ‘small picture’ on some details of the laws that structure the scales of the Universe, the new paradigm will completely alter the way humans define social sciences too… if humans accept the unity of the whole Universe and its laws before their absurd arrogance and blindness to those laws of life, love and death take them to the tomb.

This blog is the blueprint for the only real philosophy of science which respecting the laws of the scientific method can unify all disciplines of knowledge, with very simple laws that integrate all other theories of science, following the 4 main proofs of veracity in science:

  • Correspondence with all other theories, either included as limiting cases, or properly explained by the new model.
  • Experimental evidence of all systems co-existing in fractal scales, of all its topologies being only of the 3 organic varieties explained here, of all ages in time, corresponding to the 3 arrows studied here
  • Simplicity and economicity: Occam.’s razor.
  • Fallibility, as it does explain it all it should be easy to find exceptions, which becomes riddles for further research (-:
  • Predictability, as the model has done in sciences never clearly predicted before (history and economics)

And so GST capacity to explain the maximal number of entities and events with the minimal quantity of elements and laws, Vmakes GST the only serious candidate to a theory of everything:

We shall ab. T.œ, using the symbol œ of an organism of space (e) and time (o), to differentiate it from T.O.E. the much more restricted concept of physics, whose Theory Of Everything, really searches only for the previous Unification Equation of charges and masses, we have resolved earlier to avoid further discussion about what Theory is more important, The Physicist’s theory of Unification, which they have never found despite being so trivial as we have shown to be; and the T.Œ of philosophy of stiences of this blog, which will explain truly everything that you have ever thought of, including seemingly so scientific terms as religions, art and any other endeavour of the human experience.

So what we have said  is only a first step in an adventure of the mind, which will truly change the ‘stiences’ of the III millennium… advancing, harmonising and explaining further all previous theories according to the correspondence Principle, with previous theories of time space, which in encompasses, corrects and enlarge.


T. Œ; the homologic method of truths. 

In the graph GST.œ describes an organic, fractal Universe made of systems of space-time constructed with three topological dimensions of space, symmetric to three ages/functions of time, which form co-existing supœrganisms, across several scales of size and speed of time clocks.
T.Œ, a ‘Theory Of Everything organic’,  based in the rediscovery of cyclical time clocks, a concept, so obvious in Nature and the systems of time measure, which in the Eastern world was the basis of its religious philosophies of the Universe (Taoism and Hinduism) and in the West was natural to the Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek tradition, followed by Leibniz and his concept of relational space-time, of a Universe made of ‘fractal, vital spaces’ (the entities we see all around us), which lasted a finite time cycle (its cycle of creation, evolution and extinction).

All in all we realise that fractal space-time leads to the organic paradigm, which requires:

T: Cyclical time – multiple clocks with different volumes of information.

S: Moving energetic space – lineal entropic motions, and its hyperbolic, wave-like combinations…

∆: Happening across social scales of relative size, the 5th scalar dimension of space-time.

•@ And all this warped up and perceived in stillness by an informative mind

4 elements which create put together, infinite ‘finite’ space-time beings, including you, me, the computer you see, the chair you seat and everything else:

∞ ∆• ST beings…

So we shall start with a tempo ‘forte’ enough for you to dismiss either the blog, or the absurd subjective traps of ego-centered human beliefs, because we anticipate you are ‘nothing but dust of space-time’; and few men can really ‘stand’ that objective scientific reality, which not only takes you out of the centre of motions in space (Copernicus, Einstein), and motions in time (evolution of form) but also of motion in scale (Absolute relativity, as we shall find all scales of the Universe, from the tiniest atom, akin to the largest galaxy; have the same relative content of entropy, energy and information), when ‘reduced’ with 5D metric to the ‘constancy of existence: Spe x Tiƒ = ∆º.


Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 10.12.09

In the graph a summary of the fundamental elements of the Universe of fractal space-time cycles. On the left the 3 elements that structure the Universe, its cyclical Tƒ forms (membranes and points of view), which enclosed a body-limb system of vital space that moves and reproduces the system. Below the scales of the 5th dimension, in which we always will find those 2 elements.

The Isomorphic method is the detailed, orderly analysis of those elements and properties common to all beings that ‘exist’. Its full account for each species encompasses all the information needed about any ‘existential world cycle of any super organism or one of its fractal parts.

The Universe conserves the ‘present’, SxT product of both, at the point in which they are closer in harmony with similar value – in mathematical terms, the Universe minimises the Lagrangian function, at the point in which S=T, Potential energy = Kinetic energy, angular=lineal momentum, male=female, thus where the 3 elements that compose it, Sp < ST>Tƒ reach its harmony.

The graph defines the scales of  ‘∆-sciences’ and its space-time species, where ‘i’  (old graphs)  or ‘∆’ is the symbol for the ‘space-time planes’ of scientific existence, from: ∆=1 forces, through ∆=2 atoms and ∆=3 molecules, ∆=4: matter states, ∆=5: geological structures (physical scales) to ∆=4 cells, ∆=5 organisms, ∆=6 social planets, and then again, ∆=7 stars, ∆=8 galaxies and ∆=9 universes. In modern texts we use a self-centred ± cardinal with man as the ∆o scale. So the larger scales are, ∆+1: History, ∆+2: Gaia and the solar system, ∆+3 Galaxy, and ∆-1: cell, ∆-2, molecule and ∆-3: atom, to show the similar structure between those 2 limits of human perception (s ∆-3: Atom ≈ ∆+3 galaxy).

How many of those stientific scales do exist? The answer is 9, after which marvellously the systems of atoms and galaxies become so similar that once we reduce their different speed of time clocks and sizes in space with 5D metric: Spe x Tƒi= ∆k, we shall find indeed that galaxies and atoms are self-similar and so the Universe of scales might be infinite.

In any case from atoms to galaxies the ‘experimental method’ finds enough information to make a proper description of them. Beyond and below those regions uncertainty is so huge that only the ego-trips of humanity dares to utter ‘experimental dogmas’ of truth, such as the big-bang above and string theory below. So those are the stiences we shall deal with from atoms to galaxies and consider the scales beyond the ∆±4 world of particles inside the atomic nuclei and galaxies beyond the horizon of cosmic perception, completely unknown, beyond the metaphysical argument of a infinite Universe of self-repetitive scales…

In each scale of existence the fifth dimension receives in a different language a different name by each Tiƒ, singularity-mind or referential point, speaking in a different language-mapping mirror of the game of existence. So  some names humans know to explain existence in the fifth dimension are the life-death cycle and its ages (time perspective), eusocial love and its parables (organic, spatial perspective), the concept of God, as mind of all scales, Tao or Brama in eastern tradition. The hyperbolic and riemannian geometries between them, the scalar relativity formalisms; and so on. What then should be the proper definition? Several according to the multiple º∆±st views of reality.

From the pov of the mind, ∆º the best word is a ‘lanwave‘, a wave of beings directed by an informative language-network, which the Tiƒ element provides.

From the pov of the ∆±i scales, the best word is ‘social love’, the arrow of future that by sharing energy and information creates superorganisms.

From the pov of topological space-time, the best word to define it is ‘network‘, the gathering of points into social topologies, with forms and symmetric functions.

And from the perspective of the wholeness, the word ‘Absolute relativity‘, which explained the homology of the laws of all scales, none of which is preferential.

In the absolute relativity of an infinite scale of spaces, which repeat themselves from atoms to galaxies, without any reason not to be infinite, in its variations, we find also by reduction of ∆±i to ∆±1, ∞ superorganic structures, ab. Œ.

And so the supœrganism is the best choice for a meaningful understanding of the structures of social planes e find every where,, which in the next graphs are summarised from physical and biosociological sciences:

In the graph, the Universe has infinite time clocks, that code its information in the frequency and speed of its time cycles. Those time clocks change as we change scales of the fifth dimension, from vortices of ‘future time’, attractive paths designed by charges and masses, and so change the quanta of space, from planckton to cells and citizens, and the networks of entropy, energy and information, but the structure remains in space – an ∆º±1 supœrganism (œ) and time, an ∑worldcycle, sum of all steps of present e x  i momenta of the system. So we conclude that the purpose of the Universe is to create supœrganisms, tracing wordcycles of exi=st¡ence; where the balance of space and time, entropy and information ensures the being’s immortality in its ‘age of reproduction and iteration of its forms’, and each space-time plane, i=n, is described by a ‘stience’.

Overview: the structure of all scientific scales and species, its 10 dimensional isomorphisms.

General Systems sciences and its formalism describes all systems of the Universe. As such is a philosophy of science that encompasses all other sciences, both in its formal and empirical descriptions.

And so it has 3 fundamental branches; those concerned with ∆, S and T laws, which we have described in 3 x3+• formal sets of laws that define:

– The S=10¹º ‘scales’ of size of the Universe.

-The ∆-planes of Space-time, dimensional existence, which requires the evolution of non-Euclidean Geometry to describe properly all those planes of vital ‘spaces’. Thus i-logic mathematics deals with the topology of the Universe, and its points-particles. It departs from the evolved 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean Geometry.

– And the formalism of the 3 dimensions of ‘time’, which requires a non-Aristotelian logic. Thus since the universe is non-a in its logic and non-e in its geometry, we do go the next letter, which appropriately is the i (:

And then there are 2 empirical sciences, dedicated as simplex 4d sciences do to study, the 3 ‘0±1 planes of organization.

The ∆o±1 planes around man, studied by the so-called Life=biological systems

The ∆o±>2 planes both above and below, which are the astrophysical sciences, which study Physical=material systems.

And Social sciences, which in fact are a branch of biology,  both in its economic ecosystem description of organic machines and its study of Human Social Systems.

Thus ∆ST also is the foundation of formal new sciences that introduce the new logic of 3 time dimensions, the new topologies of fractal, vital space and the new organic analysis of its planes and scales, and then fit data and give new solutions within the enlarged formalism of mathematic and logic.

Those 3 formal sub disciplines are the scaffolding of all realities.

Since the formalism of those 3 ‘type of structures’, is Causal Logic (time formalism), Topology (Spatial Formalism) and Organicism (hierarchical, isomorphic planes and social scales).

Now since we deal both with a logic and mathematical formalism and a philosophy of science, on the ‘General perspective’ and an astounding array of specific data of each science framed with the scales and isomorphisms of the Universe, there are in that sense 3 main formal approaches to the discipline,; and 9 main ‘scalar sciences’.

They are studied in the down sentence, and should translate time permitted, or through the work of future practitioners the entire ‘encyclopedic’ knowledge achieved by mankind in a somehow disordered manner, both in science and philosophy, with human senses (art forms) and mechanisms (modern science) in logic language and metaphoric ones (religions, fictions, myths)

Thus the main epistemological advance of ∆ST, is the use of the same dimensional spatial, temporal and ∆ST scalar laws to describe all systems as all of them are ∆ST ‘organic systems’ that follow the 3 type of laws.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 21.07.08 In the graph a mapping of the fundamental ‘enlarged’ key laws of General Systems Sciences that all systems of the Universe follow. Classic science consider some of them in a disconnected way for certain species, we shall apply them to all species, which follow those ‘isomorphic laws’ derived from the existence of 3 common ∆ST elements in all beings. For a full understanding of the previous graph, please read the article on the 10 main isomorphisms of all the species of the Universe; its mathematical non-Euclidean i-logic geometry, its world cycle or ‘life-death ages’ and its  bidimensional topologies and 3 organic parts, which makes up a super organism.

The universe and all its fractal parts is a game of creation and destruction of ternary symmetries of space, defined by its 3 canonical topologies, the fastest geometry of planar/lineal limbs/fields of growing past, entropy≈energy, hyperbolic waves-bodies that reproduce the present system and relative future arrows of information, stored in spherical heads/particles, the topology that stores more information in lesser space. It is a topology however made of points that become fractal networks, and so each topological form is a cellular form made of smaller points, which grow in size as we come closer to them uncovering a new scale of the 5th dimension, in which each top becomes again a fractal superorganism.

It is thus a very simple structure, but the devil is in the details, and so to fully grasp how ∆st symmetric ternary beings reconstructed simultaneously in space as a ternary organism, which goes through 3 ages of life as an evolution of those topologies, and displays its actions across 3 relative ∆±1 scales of cellular/atomic, thermodynamic/organic, ecosystemic/gravitational forces, we need to create a more detailed formalism of reality.

This we achieve widening the analysis of those 3×3 structures (ternary topologies of space, ternary ages in time ternary social scales in which the being exists), into 3 x 3 + 0 ‘isomorphic sets of laws’, where the o-point or point that integrates the different parts, scales and time cycles of the being, into a ‘whole’ single entity, or ‘mind’, is the most important element.

All is indeed better explained when we have the ‘original truth’ as a reference to evaluate ‘partial versions of it’.


The basic tenants of GST.œ

We are going to explain the whole world here with only those 3 time motions, its spatial symmetries and ternary co-existent planes of the 5th dimension that creates a super organism (ab.œ) seen from a large scale as  a fractal point-particle, which in detail is a knot of cycles caused by those three arrows cycles of timespace and its ‘entropic/digestive; energetic/reprodutive and informative/perceptive’ networks, of which we are all made.

As we are all supœrganisms, whic lives a worldcycle, made of actions of absorption and emission of the 3 time arrows; as being stop and perceive, go≈move and spend energy to arrive to new fields where absorb information and motion.

Beings thus follow patterns which are beats of information and motion, actions of perceiving and feeding, either perceived as a ‘dynamic flows of time cycles’ , or as  a series of ‘still photographs of static space’, (as the duality of a movie, made of stills. We exist as a series of small derivatives, that measure and put together all those time cycles into simultaneous ‘slices’ of space’:

  • ∂t=S; which added together, K(v) x ∂t=S  creates the steady speed of time motions we see around us, v=S/∂t.

This is what we are, a sum of multiple time cycles, knotted into simultaneous synchronous flows of time, seen by the static mind that perceives them, as a series of still pictures of space that put together the fractal puzzle of the world.

And so with this duality of 3 time motions and its corresponding 3 spatial forms, we shall resolve, logically and mathematically, all the questions unresolved in science due to this huge simplification of cyclical times, the ultimate ‘formal motion’ of the Universe.

Since as it happened when Copernicus put the sun in the center (the conceptual advance) and Kepler and then Newton realized this simplified enormously the equations of the Universe according to the Principle of Truth called Ockham’s razor (which we shall call here ‘Simplicity’, S), the ‘Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So once we understand time cycles, the 5 main parameters of truth of science will work to explain it all ‘simple’ and not ‘malicious’.

We put them in a formula that paraphrase Einstein’s: Œ=Sc³; which of course ads the so often forgotten O-bjectivity, which is at the heart of most of the errors, disguised as science today. So we shall talk of Logic Objectivity and Experimental evidence as the two fundamental parameters of any theory of truth; which implies Minimalism (simplicity), Correspondence with previous theories and cyclical predictability:

-Logic Objectivity is essential to science, and it is today lost to absurd theories like the big-bang, the creationist, militaristic theory of cosmology, capitalism, the subjective dictatorship of bankers, mostly of biblical cultures, who think to be chosen of go(l)d and monopolize the right to print the language of social power, money in private hands and of course creationist theories of biology, nationalist theories of history that deny the unity of all human species, which should help each other to survive as a singe species, and mechanism, which requires a God to create the machine of the Universe, unlike the organic theories of this blog.

Logic Objectivity is thus the right objective information that the Πas observer point must fight to avoid the natural subjectivity of all points of view Рbecause that is the true fight of science; and such objectivity requires rational evaluation of:

– Experimental Evidence will show ALL to be a part or a whole cycle of time motion, including a lot of phenomena observed but not explained.

– Simplicity, will show that Time cycles explain many more things than the previous Time paradigm (Lineal Time, either in the Galilean or Einsteinian formalism). It does in fact explain it ALL, as Experimental Evidence will show all to be a time cycle.

– Correspondence will show that it also explains the previous paradigm, including Galilean and Einsteinian formalism as a ‘limiting’ case of a time cycle (that is a small part of it).

-And, yes, Complexity born only of the iteration, and ternary symmetries of the  3 arrows of time and its ternary symmetries in space and the 5th dimension

Indeed, we stress in T.Œ, the formula that resumes the ‘objective experimental elements’ of the scientific method: Œ=Sc³, whereas Œ stands for the Objective, Isomorphic, Logic reason that must guide the interpretation of the information obtained by any point of view through Experimental evidence. In that regard once more a single letter, Œ, breaks into the 3 elements it compose it: O,L,E.

Any œ point of view will absorb energy and convert it into information in its mind, adapting that evidence to its subjective, selfish point of view. This is natural to the equation of any mind and so a scientist is by no means immune to that bias. It is precisely the awareness that always we tend to bias information what guard us against all kind of ‘theories’ of reality, based in scanty data, or the use of a single language of truth (mathematics included) to evaluate that data. So truth is higher when more languages are used to evaluate truth, when more logic reason is included.

The organic paradigm stresses the multiplicity of Linguistic, Logic points of view – at least the 3 x 3 + 0 10 dimensional perspectives of the 3 scales and 3 space-time elements and the o-point that puts them all together.

So we shall r=evolve the formal language of space (¬E mathematics), time (i-logic ¬Ælgebra) and scales (Biology) and apply what we found about the structure of reality to a r=evolution that widens the scientific method to all the scales of the Universe. This I called the homologic method, considering that the same laws, topologies and organic behaviour in different scales of reality are due to the homological nature of all beings made of space-time.



In the graph, consider the well known case of homology and analogy in evolution. The bat and the bird are said not to be related genetically and their wings evolved in anagogic, parallel. Fact is in ST-beings and STiences all BEINGS share their topologic properties because they are made of spatial entropy, and the line (and plane) are the fastest/shortest distances in Euclidean light space-time. And their organic properties derived of the ∆-5th dimension are also homologic. So as we go a bit further back in time than evolution, we find that indeed the plane, the man, the bird and the bat have all the best topological form in its extremities for motion, (lineal, planar) because they all are made of ‘vital space’. This is the principle behind the homologic≈isomorphic method (equal form).

So how we classify all the isomorphic laws ST-beings follow? The simplest way is by dividing those laws through its origin, either in space symmetries, time ages, ∆-organic scales or mind-languages and its ternary Universal grammar, resumed in the language of all languages (the Generator). We do so in the second line, in which we study:

The 0 and 1 isomorphism, the mind and its languages, resumed in the language of languages, the formalism of GST and its Fractal Generator of Space-time (the equation that resumes the logic of all space-time events and scales of the Universe).

Then we study the dualities and ternary symmetries of space and time, and its space-time ‘present body-wave, energy’ combinations.

We do so in a synthetic, integral manner first, in the second and third isomorphisms; and then in an analytic, derivative form, as we consider those time-ages and world cycles of super organisms, the sum of a series of space-time actions of exchange of energy and information between the inner being and its outer world, which put together in cyclical, discontinuous events create the world cycle of all Universal systems: they are the 4th, 5th and 6th and 7th isomorphisms where we describe beings as ‘knots of space/time actions’ ruled by a series of vital constants, which are mostly ‘ratios’ between space, time and scalar quantitative parameters, and so we find in them, the connection, with the quantitative methods of the mathematical-only method of present reductionist science. 

Which lead us to differentiate in the 8th isomorphism the allowed species of each plane of existence, once the thoughts of God are literally explain in the 0-1 isomorphism in the most general way, then in a symmetric manner in the 2nd and 3rd isomorphisms (duality and trinity), to expand them further in the 4th, 5th and 6th isomorphisms (around the ±4 planes systems exchange energy and information with through the 5th actions and the 6 main vital constant ratios of each being, and its 7 different motions=changes=time cycles)…

Finally once we study how dual and ternary symmetries (2³=8), create the Universe within the limits of its minimalist elements, as we are all made of ‘temporal entropy’, we can see how beings evolve socially through networks into superorganisms, along the decametric, logarithmic scales of creation that first develop ‘genetic societies’ (based in time relations), then spatial ones (based in geographical extensions) and finally space-time ones (based in organic networks) to form an ∆+1 10ˆ10 §upœrganism), which gives birth to a new ∆≈Ξ-plane of existence (∆ being the dynamic symbol, Ξ the static organic ternary one).

So we complete the full description of how ∆ûst (ab. dust of space-time) becomes a super organism through a world cycle of existence, emerging into a whole, ∆, from an initial ∆-1 seed of information, till it returns to the ∆-1 scale.

So we will have developed the verbal conceptual knowledge of the first line in a more formal, scientific manner, using the expanded isomorphic method, which we will be able to apply then in the 3rd line for each species and being – time permitted, and if not, as Descartes put it when he found 400 years ago the previous huge ‘advance of the scientific method’ since Aristotle, with analytic geometry: we shall stop here our analytic geometry to leave something to do  to future researchers, which will expand these notions (quoting from memory).

Now, for those who find strange the symmetry between numbers and properties, Ok, the 6th and 7th isomorphism (vital constants of each being and cyclical motions) can be argued to have more or less fundamental elements.

So I have selected the most important constants and cycles to fit this classification, doubting often between describing 6 or 7 constants or cycles (hence both versions might be found in different sections of the web). Yet as it stands, they are fairly covered; since numbers do have indeed a certain ‘numerology’ hidden on the symmetries of species.

Indeed when cheng-tzu said from one, the line comes 2, the information of bidimensional cycles or broken lines which combine to reproduce 3 and then ∞ beings, is expressing something mathematicians wonder around since the Chinese and Fermat first introduced as mathematical concepts – the laws of numbers).

But this is a theme of the section on maths, which will be the last to be covered (: PRECISELY because nobody will take seriously this work till I show you every main law of mathematics to be related to GST, ∆•ST laws 🙂 So nobody will bother me, till the believer and pedantic scholar thinks I am talking his language of God, well-enough to deserve respect.

Now, how we do ‘detailed’ studies of this motions of existence, which develop a program of actions in space-time, which creates a finite super organism with a finite duration? In the first line we have done it in a loose way, as we study the meaning of those concepts and give a general view of the algorithm of creation of the Universe. In the second line, introduced by this post, we shall do it in greater detail by analysing those super organisms of ∆•st of space-time and its world cycles, part by part, considering how the ∆, S, T and •mind-point structure the growth and dissolution of dust of space-time into a superoganism of island universe back and forth, through those world cycles. So we can better distinguish between the main sets of organic laws that guide those motions through scales, topologies and ages of space-time.

The scales of energy and information, in decametric, or dual scales.

Wholes have the capacity to kill smaller wholes, but at certain degree of smallness the whole becomes in fact a potential prey. Parts, bacteria that kill wholes, thus can also disaggregate wholes. The predator prey relationship is thus ore complex than it appears. But in any case ever herd ∑Ei, regardless of its inner ∏Tƒ form is perceived as energy for a higher whole, ∏∆+1, which will try to explode the ∑ herds and feed on I∆-1 forms, laving behind the ∑ head.

He state in which one finds at each moment of the existential game, prey in a herd, knot of higher thought reproducer, creator, all those functions as complex as we might feel them are finally mere åctions of the equation of existence, and that sets the existential algebra as the mathematics of the function of existence.

Which itself is the generator equation of complementary systems of energy and information eh fundamental particle of reality made of an Se x Tƒ sections body-head, particle-fields that preys in a herds of micropoints ∑Sp∆-1 and so we establish a hierarchical class structure of future, present and past also as the future takes advantage of the present and the past is the neuronal caste of information while the present is the middle class which busy busy reproduces and produces the entropy of ∑Sp∆-1.

This is the key to understand in terms of social classes past, the lower caste, present the reproducer, repeater caste and future the informative caste. For example in human scales, male which are mind dominant, with lineal bodies and woman which are productive body dominant, with an energy head, you can establish future, upper caste of males a reproductive caste of women, and then the ∑ of ∆-1 natural animals seen as a lower caster of information and hence treated as pure energy by the human ‘family’ complementary couple, man-woman.

The expression in which the simultaneous equation of past=energy, present=reproduction future=Information manifests itself. Are multiple.

Energy (past, ecosystem) > Present (reproductive body) >Future, (Informative mind)…

It is the simplest and most common point of view, a fractal future zero point of maximal information guides a middle class of reproductive capacities, and higher matter brains, that keep the join relationship between energy and information alive: Sp X Tƒ =K, S=T+K, K, Sp, Tƒ.

The sub-disciplines of ∆ST

In the graph, a glimpse to the 3 type of dimensions of scalar space-time, the 9 scales in which beings interact, its 3 topological organs or ‘fractal dimensions of space’ and its 3 ages of its world cycle, analyzed with existential algebra (the equations below), in this case for the human ‘variety’.

Ultimately the formalism of ∆-scalar spaces-times and its philosophy General Systems Sciences, are dimensional theories.

Still we can distinguish a sub-discipline of Dimensional Theory proper which describes the 15:3s+3t+9st Dimensions of all systems.

Because ‘Se, Space dimensions’, Sl, Sh, Sw (fractal length-lineal motion, height-cyclical motion and width-wave motion), Time Dimensions (Tp<e, Tr=a, Tf>o, past-young entropy, present-repetitive adult action, and future old form), and ∆-scalar dimension of size and different speed of time, ruled by the metric ∆=Sp x Tƒ are of different quality, they give birth to different sub disciplines.

So we have 3 specific disciplines, which study in great detail those dimensions grouped into its 3 different types, both as generic types and as ‘isomorphisms’ of topological forms, time ages and scalar organization, common to all beings of the Universe:

Spatial Dimensions, studied by ∆-topology – the mind’s language that in a synoptic way expresses the 3 bidimensional varieties of space.

Existential Algebra, which studies the 3 causal time-ages.

Theory of Organisms, which divides in 2 fundamental sub-disciplines, a larger view, which studies the ∆-scalar dimensions, and its laws; that is the 9 0±4 scales in which the being interacts and a shorter time-span, space-size view, which study the social S10 scales of evolution needed to ‘transcend’ between ∆-planes.

Absolute relativity.

The fundamental law of the ‘metric of ∆-planes’ is the law of absolute relativity:

‘0±4=Se x Tƒ: the product of the spatial energy and temporal information, or ‘existential force’ of any system of the Universe is co-invariant, has the same value, thus in ‘subjective’ Tƒ, frequency time, any system of a given family of 0±∆ co-invariant entities in the Universe live the same quantity of existence”

This is the basis of Absolute relativity, the implicit non-anthropomorphic philosophy of science of ∆ST.

It is then obvious that from a philosophical perspective ST is a theory of absolute relativity, as all systems follow the same isomorphisms. Further on the ∆-dimensions of the Universe  – as we prove in the post on the Unification of charges and masses, that determines the isomorphism of atoms and galaxies deduced from that equation, both quantitative and qualitatively  – are infinite in number.

Thus humans merely occupy the ‘central ∆-position’ of the scales we know. And this explains also the similarity of the smaller and larger one, and the lack of perception of both (quantum uncertainty and cosmic dark matter and energy).

So we get much more information on the scales of organisms, life and societies, NOT because they are more complex but because we perceive it all. If we were able to see the entire galaxy 96% hidden energy and dark matter, it would resemble a cell. And since an atom and a galaxy are self-similar the most obvious hypothesis is that all scales are organic, all have complex forms.

So for the 3³ ∆-dimensions known to man, we shall form groups of 3 that form the 3 fundament systems:

  • the ‘∆-1 force, ∆-atom, ∆+1 molecules
  • the ∆-1 cell, individual, ∆+1 society,
  • And the ∆-1 star, ∆-galaxy and ∆+1 Universe. And as it happens, we can model a galaxy as an atom, whereas the stars are the electronic nebulae, the black holes the protons, and so the Universe we see must be the commonest group of atoms we perceive (99% of the atoms of the cosmos): a cloud of hydrogen.

Indeed, Einstein-Walker model already modeled galaxies as hydrogen atoms to get his relativity equations. The metric of ∆-scales show protons to have the radius of black holes and electronic nebulae the quantum wave equation of galaxies. 

Further on, when we consider the entire human scale, we find that we use as ‘energy’ ∆-2 molecules, breath ∆-3 oxygen and perceive ∆-4 light pixels, and further above us, we receive our ‘sun-energy’ from ∆+2 solar systems…

While the galaxy is responsible of the existence of the sun and its gravitational, black hole waves might even be cause of the 11 year cycles of sun spots, with the same periodicity, which themselves influence the cycles of weather of the planet, which determine the cycles of history in great measure.

So to fully grasp the interrelationships of mankind at all levels the full model must account for all the ∆-scales mankind perceives, the 3³ scales.

The isomorphisms of all scales.

Those laws are the main 9 isomorphisms of the Universe:

General Systems and scalar space-time, 2 sides of the same coin.

Thus ∆ST theory is born of the fusion of two disciplines. A formal one: the creation of  the long sought mathematical and logic model of ‘relational space and time’ (the alternative model to Newton’s absolute time and space, first proposed by Leibniz and proved truth by the multiplicity of time clocks of different speeds in the Universe of Relativity theory and common experience – as a time clock is any cycle which from sun’s years to atomic orbitals from circadian cycles to life-death cycles exist all per reality).

Now this so evident fact – that time is cyclical and has different speeds – have been obscured by the ‘tool of measure’ invented by Newton – the equalization of all time clocks with the mechanical clock, and its ‘elongation’ into an abstract line in a Cartesian coordinates. Which is fine as it is an ‘artifact’ of measure. The problem with it is when it became ‘an absolute truth’, and the artifact of measure was confused with reality. Leibniz already noticed and explained that all what exists is NOT in an abstract Cartesian graph of lineal space and time – the artifact. But is made of a vital space, the space we occupy and a content of time, the sum of all our life cycles between birth and extinction.

We were made of time and space dimensions. And so the properties of those time dimensions (of past, present and future, the 3 phases of any cycle, which has a ‘beginning-past’, a middle term or steady state, repetitive frequency, when the cycle seems not to change or ‘present’ and a final phase when it dies away or future, old age), and the properties of those vital spaces (which can be seen as fixed dimensions, or as motions, hence the use of ‘vectors’ that combine lineal distances and motions to study them mathematically), were the key to find ‘isomorphisms’, similar properties in all beings in existence.

There was though, a 3rd element, in the structure of those spaces and times – the scales of organization of all systems, which happen to co-exist across a cellular/atomic, individual and cosmic, social scale of relative size. So space-time was ‘scalar’, ‘fractal’ and the size relative to our perception of it, which we improved with telescopes and microscopes.

And we were made not only of dimensions of time and space, but ‘dimensions of size’, and social organization, structures that were parts of wholes, units of bigger wholes.

So Leibniz said ‘the smallest point must be considered a world in itself’.

And indeed every ‘fractal point’ of the Universe, redefined with the completion of the 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry, is both a world that encloses 3  spatial and 3 temporal Dimensions and a point from the higher perspective that evolves socially into 3³+s∧i=10S∧i scalar structures or bigger planes of existence.

And those ST-dimensions, social scales and planes common to all beings are the origin the ‘isomorphisms’, equal forms and laws that all systems of the Universe display.

And so this model of ‘∆ST ‘ isomorphic scalar space-time is the theoretical culmination of 400 years of observance of the Universe with ‘tools’ that peer on the 0±∆ scales of size of reality, clocks that measure its rhythm of time and rods that measure its size of space. The journey has been rocky and it is plagued of ‘errors’ caused mainly by physicists’ confusion of abstract tools of measure and ‘realities’. And by the lack of interest in the ‘ultimate whys’ that cause those realities.

Measure of course is OK, but it is not all what there is to science. Feynman famously said that the why is the only thing physicists do not ask. Well, it is actually the more important thing a scientist should be ask. Measure should only be the ‘how’ or previous step to ask the whys, without which science remains incomplete.

It is for that reason, I did not limit the model to physicists, which as we shall see is the origin of most conceptual errors about the Universe, regarding framed it into a philosophy of science which is wide enough to accept 2 basic concepts of ∆ST reality: its scalar, social structure, from where its isomorphisms originate, and its organic, social nature, as those scales are organized in networks that become the constitutive parts of the next ∆-scale.

The spatial single continuum of Physical models is a reductionist view of that wider reality, reduced to a single ∆-scale and only 4 dimensions. And so its philosophy of science is reductionist also as it only needs to explain that reduced part of the organization of reality.

Now, the word i, stands for ‘isomorphism’ or ‘invariance’ (in the 5th Dimensional compact model) which is the fundamental ‘theme’ analyzed in General systems.

And the 9 isomorphisms that all systems follow, derive of its Dimensions, Planes and social scales. As all of them:

Are made of spatial energy and temporal information, the 2 substances of reality, either seen in motion as energy and time, or in still form as space and information: S=∑e, T=∑o

Have accordingly a length, which is the direction of motion that consumes our energy; of height, the dimension of perception and information, stored in temporal cycles; and width the bilateral dimension of reproduction. And accordingly to be made of 3 topological organs, fields/limbs of energy, reproductive bodies/waves and particles/heads of information live through 3±∆ ages of time, an energetic, between our seminal birth in the ∆-1 scale and our death back to it: young entropic youth, an age of balance and ∆+1 social reproduction and a 3rd, old age of information.

enact through those spatial organs during our 3 ages, 3+i åctions, feeding on energy, gauging information, iterating=reproducing our systems and evolving socially into higher S1o social scales.

Till the system emerges into a higher ∆-plane of existence, or simply dies down to a lower ∆-1 plane, dissolving its information, and completing its world cycle of life and death.

Which they live from an ∆-centered point of view, doing so through the will of the ‘mind’, the zero point of maximal perception of the system that carries the informative order.

Thus all those isomorphisms have its cause in the fact that beings are made of the ‘same’ Dimensions of:

  • Space : Height, width, length.
  • Time: past, present and future ages.

And all of them form social groups that interact with the larger planes of reality,

  • Across 0±4≈ 9 Planes: from 0±4 Universal forces that move them to the cosmos which provides those forces, across intermediate 0±3 light/galactic scales that provide them with the bits of light-information, through 0±2 planetary worlds, which give them the energy to breath and feed, closer into its 0±1 cellular and social scales that sustain its individual self.

So both elements, the GS philosophy and its isomorphisms, and the scalar planes space-time formalism go together.

And they allow us to study in depth all the aspects of all those systems, or do so in extraordinary detail for each species, studying all those ‘isomorphisms’ and ‘social scales of evolution’, deducing all the laws of those systems from them.

So a good term for the entire ‘full science’ would be ∆ST, which puts together both terminologies, the philosophical and formal ones.

In a classic sense it would be the definitive form of ‘philosophy of science’ or  ‘metaphysics’, which studies the laws or Will of the Whole Universe, the Logos of reality.

GSTœ as a scientific revolution: a higher objectivity.

In the graph, true science consists in make human more objective about its not preferred position on the fractal, organ universe. First copernicus took us from its spatial centre, then Darwin from eternal time, Marx put man below the machines, weapons and money (organic, entropic and informative metal species, we shall call memes), and its company-mothers, which DO run the world, next Einstein put us out of any reference frame with its special and general relativity and finally GST (Ab. general systems theory) brings Absolute objective relativity about the position of man even in its relative scales of size.

As Schopenhauer put it: ‘man is just a mush over a rock in a corner of the Universe’. And yet the astounding beauty of the game, when it is properly, humbly, objectively understood makes ‘existence’ all what one wishes and deserves.

Those who however repress existence with absurd mandates against your reproductive pleasures (sex as sin), energetic food (dietary laws), social love (evolution into larger wholes) and deny its own ethic languages and species (verbal thought substituted by mathematics, the language of machines), as the dominant western civilisation does, enslaving for the evolution and reproduction of another species, the machine, will have no future, and no pleasure in existence, seeking for myths and other worlds, ending not even living in this one.

Since ∆º±st, is always a system with a mind/particle of information, body/wave of energy and limbs/fields of entropic motions; you exist simply speaking to maximise your limb/field motions, your body-wave reproduction and your head/particle of informative perception, regardless of the specific forms of those systems, and the languages of perception, mostly mathematical and visual you use to orientate your system on the game.

So ∆º±st will be the fundamental particle of the Universe, a fractal of causal scales of space-time, self-centred in a mind-mirror, which controls a finite vital space, has a limited duration in time and tries through its actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information, to survive, with a simple program of ‘actions’ that we shall express in a simple equation of ‘stationary points’: Max. E X I (S=T), MAXIMIZES your existence, by increasing ad maximal your entropy, e, information, i, and its product, or ‘momentum=existential force’, which happens when spatial entropy and temporal information are equal and in balance (S=t); since for any e+i, Max. e x i -> s=t (5 x 5 > 6 x 4  7 x 3).

This then the Universe in a nutshell, a fractal of entropy, energy and information, extended in three relative social, organic scales, in which each part is made to the image of the whole, always a supœrganim of  scalar space-time.

As we are now to study the ‘monad-minds’ of the Universe, and its linguistic formal mirrors, let us conclude with a resume in symbols of non-Æ logic (the enhanced formalism of time and space built with three arrows, scales and parts), the main arrows of the Universe.

As we have shown a deeper analysis of time cycles proves them to have always 3 ‘ages’, ‘phases’, ‘arrows’, ‘states’ or  ‘dimensions’:

  • < (symbol of expansive ENTROPY flow), Ps: Past, entropic motions, dominant in the youth, with a toroid, lineal expansive form.
  • > (implosive, INFORMATIVE flow), ƒt: Future-form: a cyclical time vortex proper.
  • (symbol of iterative, present MOMENTUM wave): ST: Present-iterative motions that don’t seem to change; or dynamic, body-wave motion
  • Ω, W, ∑: Symbols of a whole 0-sum world cycle, which is conserved, often measured with the parameters of an energy conservative cycle.

And this give us the 3 main ‘variations of the Generator which describes existence in Time and Space, easily written as:

Time-like sequential events:   Ps (young entropic age) > ST(adult, iterative-reproductive age) ≥ Ft (informative age) ≤ Ps (entropic death)

Space-like, simultaneous structures:    Sp (Limbs/fields) ≤ ST (body-wave) ≤ It (head-particle)

Scale-like social processes: with the quantum/cellular, ∆-1, ∆-thermodynamic/organic or ∆+1 gravitational/world scales in physical and biological systems.

Those symmetries correspond in space to the only 3 topological forms; hence systems can only be constructed with those 3 topologies that define as the graphs show all organisms and physical species.

The Universe is a broken puzzle of three motions of time, entropy and information, and its infinite energetic combinations, put together into knots, called beings and species.

The universe is simple. As there are 3 arrows of time-future choices bifurcate reality often in ternary paths. You can always go the way of entropy, and dissolve yourself, the way of energy and repeat your present exi=stence or the way of information and elighten yourself.

But what those three arrows of time, when they mix and merge into each other across those organisms, form? There is any intelligence in the flow of times? For that we must observe at the being as an entity in space, and then we see indeed that time arrows in space form complex organ systems where the functions of those arrows become vital physiological networks and systems on the living organism.

In that manner we observe the three arrows of time becoming (graph 2), three organs of space.

And this symmetry between functions in time and forms in space, is the fundamental symmetry of the Universe.

All Universal entities are fractal ternary systems of 3 dimensions of space, symmetric to 3 dimensions of time co-existing in 3 relative scales of ∆-size, giving birth to a fractal generator equation of space-time beings able to describe all beings that ‘exi=st’: ∆ºST±1:

Past, entropic, |-Spe limbs/fields < ST-Present-iterative energetic body-waves>Tiƒ: Future, informative cyclical heads-particles.

In the graph above some of the ternary systems of the Universe, its 3 topologies of space, each one forming one organ which maximises one of its 3 time dimensions, the relative simpler past, entropic, lineal motions performed by its limbs/fields; the relative present≈iterative energy, performed by body-waves and informative logic time clocks, the relative future head-particle that directs the being.

Below the 3 scales of physical and biological systems, the ∆-1 ¥-quantum=atomic scale; the ∆º thermodynamic scale, and the ∆+1 gravitational scale, which correspond to the human ∆-1: cellular, bio-chemical, ∆º:individual and ∆+1 ecosystemic level of our existence.

The most beautiful part of this blog is in that sense, the enormous simplicity of the fundamental equations of the fifth dimension and its immediate connection with the simple elements of reality, which by iteration of its dual and ternary principles we and future researchers shall raise through the 4 lines of this blog to encompass all what exist.

Now it must be understood at an even more general level that the Universe is all about the Generator:

Combining yin-formation and yang-entropy to give birth to present momenta and its waves of ∞ beings, evolved socially into wholes.

And yes, indeed i quote taoism because it was the first astounding highest verbal expression of the ∆±i ST pillars of reality, which mathematical physics has failed till this blog to properly understand.

Let us then consider the first Line through some basic definition of GST

DEFINITIONS. Worldcycles in time, super organisms in space, scales of infinity.  

Symbols of Existential Algebra used to describe the 9+i isomorphisms, social scales and ∆-planes of reality:

Paraphrasing Einstein, i-logic geometry (space p.o.v.) = existential algebra (time p.o.v.) – give us both, the Thoughts of The Creator – the Generator Equation and ‘Its’ details – every part and event of the Universe, whose laws derive from such ‘Thoughts’:

The 3 Arrows/Dimensions of Time: <, >, =.

<: It is the explosive big-bang, death-entropy arrow that defines the creation of spatial energy: O<Sp or past arrow.

 >:  It is the implosive temporal life-order arrow that defines the creation of information: Sp>O.

=, <=>: Is the arrow of present, simultaneous exchange of energy and information between 2 poles: Sp<=>O.

In Universal Grammar is the arrow of self-similarity.

The 3 Topologies of Space are represented by letters or ‘geometric symbols’ (O=Es; O=Tƒ: <=>, Ø =Sp X Tƒ):

– Spe or |: It is the membrane, energetic part, male pole, 3D spherical topology  (in 2, 1D, the plane or line)

-Tƒi, O: It’s the zero point, informative part, brain, female pole, 3D hyperbolic topology (in 2, 1D, the vortex, cycle)

Where we encoded the oppositions between S=pace-entropy vs. Time in-form, Past vs. future

-<=>,Ø, Sp X Tƒ: It is the body, reproductive part, ‘son’, 3D toroid topology, (in 2D, the cone).

The 4 Existential åctions: ∆ï, ∆E, ï,œ û; ∑ , ∏: They, and their combinations, define the program of existence.

 ∆ï is the action of information gauging.It is the 1st Postulate of i-logic, the 1D of information – rotation, cycle.

– ∆Sp is the action of Energy feeding. It is the 2nd Postulate & the 1st Dimension of Energy – length, motion.

 ST=Sp X Tƒ is the action of Bonding that creates complementary systems related to the 3rd Postulate.

– <=> is the action of communication; mostly between 2 points, Sp<=>Tƒ & defines the 2nd Dimension: the wave.

– ∑, ∑û is the action of social evolution, either reproduction ∑Sp X Tƒ, or Herding: ∑ Ei, creating a 3D, width-plane. And its variety:

∏, ±∆ is the action of network creation of superorganisms across 3 existential planes: ∆-1 cellular, ∆-organic & ∆+1 social plane through an informative language. It obeys a power law, as T cycles will create Tƒ  axons. Thus: ∏T>Tƒ

Those symbols define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the invariances in space (topological invariances) and Time (causal chains, sequential ages), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<=>∏Tƒ.

Such as the Universe allows any combination forwards (>) and backwards (<) or without motion=change (=) in time; any topological combination or transformation between Sp, Tƒ,<=>; any sequential sum of åctions (∆ï, ∆Sp, Sp<ST>Tƒ; ∑, ∏ ±∆ ) and any ∆±2 jump and/or transfer of energy and/or information between planes of existence (as systems co-exist in 3 scales) but nothing else.

And as we explore in the mathematical posts, the most experimental of all ‘stienœs’, those rules we will indeed SEE once and again how the ternary principle holds. i.e.: there are only three topological varieties in a single three dimensional space, there are overwhelmingly only three degrees of differential equations with use in science; as three is the number of scales, topologies of space-time, which the mind-will perceives and enacts, beyond which ‘reality becomes undistinguishable’.

And of all those possible partial games the most perfect of them all is the one of super organisms, which hence is the immortal game: fractal point minds that construct herds that evolve as they gather density into a social super organism efficiently defined by its networks (third line of the blog explaining this game from the mind pov, first line from an objective external view).

 fractal points are forms, with social content, evolving in topo-biologic organisms.

At the end of the journey, of studying a super organism we come to a series of ‘willing points’, in which a series of space-time actions converge, converting the monads-points of the fractal space-time Universe into Non-Euclidean points (5th and 1st postulate of non-E topology). Thus since points have exi parts its lines of communication are ‘cycloid’ waves; its topological planes that connect n-points through n² lines become ‘networks’ of energy and information (with dark spaces between them) and the mind-point with its height-dimension of information, the informative-perceptive part on top of all systems, which guides it as its linguistic minds.

Not to look too far out we shall bring examples of stiences and maths to illustrate many statements (proofs in GST are first empirical, and then ‘consistent’ with the scientific method and its complex non-Aristotelian logic.
We DO REJECT, the ‘selfie-ego trip’ of mathematicians, who think as Hibert, the arrogant german idealist that ‘we imagine lines, and points’. NOT SO, as Godel’s incompleteness theorem states and Lobachevksi’s ¬E geometry proves, mathematical models must be ‘tested’ experimentally, which is what Einstein’s model did .

So WE need ALSO IN MATHEMATICS experimental evidence to prove a ‘true mathematical statement’ real (as Einstein quipped to Poincare: i know when maths are truth, but not when they are real). So maths, the blue pure thought, IF it can imprint the limiting ‘nature’ of simple entropy, becomes REAL SPACE-TIME:


We cannot as GST is the summit of all human knowledge, made synthetic, explain each quote, but we are keeping it all to the level of a first University student of ‘social, biological and physical sciences’, on purpose. Our goal is TO GIVE YOU A SENSE OF IT ALL, OF THE THOUGHTS OF GOD, not of all the details, which would be an impossible task for an old man.

Then you or others will keep making GST, the philosophy of the XXI c.

The many perspectives we can cast in those cyclical knots of space-time actions do not make us forget the most objective view of them as ‘mind-knots’, which consciously or subconsciously mechanically or organically by selection or program, which ever perspective you want to accept, seem to establish the order of a certain domain of space-time that turns around the point of order. Those domains with the ternary topology described as a fractal ternary system is the commonest form of the Universe. And its mathematical description is immediate when we consider each mind a ‘fractal point’ that shrinks without deformation a spherical topology (poincare’s conjecture) converting its inner and outer reality into a subconscious and conscious mapping, ‘action-oriented’ as it seems to act with the function of existence in its ‘mind’, creating ∆±e, i, ∑exi, structures and events that conform the program of a world cycle explained in those tests.

If we are to start with strong terminology, we could consider all of those space-time systems self-centered in a mind with non-Æ logic mathematical terms.

THEN, we could state simply that all what you see is a particle-point of space-time, knot of space-time actions, a fractal Non-Euclidean point which perceives as a mind a territory of order around its still quantum mind of space-time synchronous mappings, which slowly moves ahead the domain of the being, choosing between different new space-time cycles that mess the internal space-time beings, into ever more complex cycles, till their finite frequency breaks down into entropic death.

So those systems will have a central point of view, or still mind, connected sensorially to the external membrane, through which it will perceive the world in which its internal territory will perform its ∆-1 cycles of existence. How this ‘complex point’ achieved a vital program of existence which seems to repeat in almost every system or domain organised in 3 territorial forms=functions=organs is a fascinating inquire of the mind, which will come to the final conclusion that essentially any fractal system, physical, biological or social can be reduced to such description as the unifier ‘ultimate’ meaning of existence all those systems follow… guided by the fractal point, made to the image and likeness of all its micro-fractal ∆-1 points, and performing its same actions in the ∆+1 fractal world.

As all points are part of networks that become ‘topological wholes’, we have now the basic knowledge of a single plane-reality to go further into the true r=evolution of fractal space-time, the understanding of the fifth dimension…

Indeed we still need and entire new dimension of the universe to understand it.

Do you think the Universe is constructed in ‘fractal scales’ from the smallest particle to the whole galaxy, whose laws of organisation (encoded in the metric equations of the fifth dimension) are worth to know and relevant to the structure of reality? If you have wonder about it, you are ripe to understand the 5th dimension (as usual, knowledge is far easier when someone has ‘asked the right questions’, as most humans adscribe to the naive realism of the audiovisual age, don’t even realise such questions exist for things that are not ‘evident’).

Now, an important remark on algebraic equations and geometry, akin to the nature of visual perception and words that we shall soon understand in terms of the generator equation. WHILE VISUAL IMAGES AND TOPOLOGICAL LAWS ARE DIRECT EVIDENT TRUTHS EXTRACTED FROM REALITY, SO are the simplest forms of mathematics, numbers, as social points; the syntactic, synoptic equations of algebra and the sentences of verbal thoughts DO NOT EXIST IN REALITY as geometry and visual perception does; they are pure mental synoptic languages that try to store maximal information within the mind.

This means THEY ARE NOT REAL. That level  abstraction thus is the human-computer mind view of the real geometric, visual space-time Universe of formal motions, reason why GST is so important to better connect mind languages and reality.

The 4 elements of the organic universe: lineal space, cyclical time, linguistic minds and fractal scales.

This ‘dualist’ philosophy of science will then turn out to be a more complex alternative philosophy of science, which has been with us since the earlier dualist philosophies of the eastern world (taoism, hinduism) entered Europe through German philosophy and is at the heart of multiple key laws of nature, from the Principle of complementarity of quantum physics to the hegelian duality of social doctrines of history to the duality body-mind of biological systems.

To that eternal duality of ‘ST’ space and time (which we shall show to be equivalent to entropy and form), we need to ad though 2 elements completely ignored by classic eastern philosophies, but at the heart of western science.

The problem of the mind (ab. • or @) that perceives the ‘whole’ Universe from an infinitesimal point of view, through a language that bias reality to fit it into the brainl and so the problem of epistemology and truth, and experience and its limits…

And the question of an scalar, fractal Universe, (ab. ∆) in which there are ‘different co-existing planes of being’, parts and wholes, as you for example co-exist as a system of atoms, molecules, cells, organs and you are part of a larger whole world.

So the new ‘paradigm’ of a Universe dominated by information NOT by motion and entropy needs 4 fundamental upgradings to convert ‘science’ into ‘stience’:

  • The understanding of fractal space and cyclical time (ST)
  • Of the mind and the logic syntax of the language we use to ‘reduce’ the total information o the Universe (∆º, ø-mind)
  • And the scales of the ‘5th dimension of planes of space-time co-existing in all systems and organisms, (∆).
  • All together we write the 4 components of all systems: ∆øST. And affirm the Universe is made of ‘dust of space-time’…

We shall therefore develop with those four elements, ∆•ST, the only formal, logico-mathematical model of general systems sciences which upgrades all disciplines with the laws of duality – the study of the Universe with 2 arrows of time and its ‘present combinations’. Since we shall soon find to fully make account of all those universal systems we will have also to upgrade the 2 formal languages of science, concerning space (mathematics) and time (logic causality).

As the new unit of maths will be the ‘fractal non-euclidean point’ which becomes larger as we come to it, revealing an entire internal world; and the new logic of time will not be single, one-dimensional, Aristotelian in its causality but use 3 arrows of time, entropy, information and its energetic combinations to describe a much more complex ‘fine structure to reality’, which paradoxically as we build from such dust of space-time all other entities, will show ultimately to ‘produce much simpler, homologic, self-similar beings’ all of us…

We call this upgrading of mathematics and logic, ¬æ, as it is ‘non-aristotelian and non-euclidean’, or ‘i-logic mathematics’ as i comes after a-e, and certainly the wonders of a world ruled by information, so deeply misunderstood by the bias towards energy of centuries of ‘mechanical science’, are ‘spooky’ and strange enough to seem i-logic to the simple mind.

Or rather as saint Augustine said of God’s mind, which he call ‘the seer of time’, of ‘a logic higher than man’, since as Plato put it, ‘the whole cosmos is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called logos’…

In that regard, if we were to make a ‘hierarchy of stiences’ we shall put first GST, as it tries by all means to understand the complex i-logic of the mind of the Universe,which is above humans and its Æ-languages; thne i-logic mathematics, the ¬Æ upgrading of space-time ‘stiences’; next all the others as all scales follow the same isomorphic laws; of which a hierarchy must therefore establish on the grounds of proximity to humans, the observers, as errors of perception diminish near our ∆0 mind-point; plus what we learn about man in medicine and history  help us (so those are the queens of all stiences as it deals with our survival as individuals and societies).

On the limit, curiously enough, as today it is heralded as the ‘king of all knowledge’, the ‘manly’, entropy only theories of ‘fantaphysics’, which is astoundingly biased in favor of ‘entropy=death arrows’, has a worldly religion to make weapons that kill man, has the maximal uncertainty of observation, deals with invisible remote scales that matter nothing to us, and so it is irrelevant (string theory), dangerous (nuclear physics beyond the level of known-known particles) and plainly false (SUSY, evaporation of black holes, 2nd law of thermodynamics and its arrow of only entropy in a dead Universe)…

So after giving you so many revelations of the true structure of reality we must do a bit of ‘contra physicist’ and debunk many of the myths and falsehoods of lineal science that drag on and prevent the evolution of our knowledge of reality…

The errors of lineal Time as entropy≈locomotion.

Now, as today there is a queen of philosophy of science, called ‘physics’, which is full of… well, ‘errors’ of thought as philosophy. And the biggest error is the pretentious priesthood of quantum physicists who ‘believe’ their scale of size and time clocks is more important than all others, which they try to explain in terms of its laws and jargons. FACT though is that in the fractal paradigm, all scales of reality follow the same laws (quantum physics through the Bohm-Broglie pilot-wave interpretation recently proved by the EM engine, which adds the ‘particle-polar’ field-position (Spe>Tiƒ) state to the wave state completing quantum physics according to the 5th dimensional paradigm, so we shall of course describe quantum physics and its 3 elements, with our generator equation also: quantum potential (spe) < Schrodinger wave (St)>Particle (tiƒ). )

This means there is no hierarchy and physics is not more important, but less than organic medicine because we can see better a human being, plus medicine has clear positive consequences for our species and so biology and history, the stiences of man as fractal organism and mankind in space, history in time as our global species-superorganism become the new queen stiences; while non-Aristotelian logic and Non-euclidean mathematics NOT physics, become the foundational stiences of space-time.

So we shall r=evolve science from its inception, by improving the 2 languages of knowledge, maths and logic to better reflect as a mind mirror, the multiplicity of worlds there are in the Universe. 

Since earlier attempts to compromise and merely ‘adapt’ classic sciences to the new laws of information and the ‘program or algorithm’ of the Universe were dull and ‘perpetuated’ the errors of simplex science  and æ-languaes, dedicated to study only one of the many type motions of the Universe, the simplex one, locomotion, and pretending it is all what really matters about reality.


All this said the 2 highest moments of this constant 30 years orgasm of communion with the Universe and its mind languages, I have experienced have been the understanding of the mind-languages≈Universal languages connection, through the 2 highest expressions of the human mind, objective mathematics, and subjective art (where man strives to reach its maximal perception of the whole through verbal-logic-time languages/literature/poetry/laws/ethics and visual-artistic-spatial forms).

So the reader should excuse me if I have been considered for most of my life a painter-writer-film maker. But truly beyond human subjective expression nothing equals the pleasures of understanding the laws of vital mathematics, expressed through its temporal and scalar disciplines, ∆nalysis and algebra. So this blog will not be completed till christmas 2017 when i complete the section on vital mathematics, the final ‘crown’ of the blog. Topology, Group Theory and Analysis will then show to be truly the most perfect mirror of the Universe.

And the key of course is the existence of more than one times=changes=motions and the way they form causal chains of discontinuous beats, such as: 

  • The reproductive stop to feed on energy-and-go: S-t-s
  • THE beat of perceiving information in stillness-reproducing it through motion: st-t-st-t
  • The beat of reproduction, social evolution, reproduction till emerging in a new scale: st-∆-st-∆

The description in formal GST terms of all the events, creations, evolutions, reproductions and motions of the Universe through those beats is the exhaustive method of FORMALIZATION of this blog.

screen-shot-2017-01-09-at-11-25-28How do we connect this with classic algebra? Mainly through the concept of mirror symmetries and groups. Indeed, consider the cases of mathematical physics, where the ‘allowed particles’ of any physical system are ‘octets’ tailored with group theory and all the possible symmetries and solutions to an equation.   All this works so its truth but nobody understand, to the point that weyl called the whole abstract algebraic formulation of physics ‘the pest of group theory’

Yet since evolution in time is a beat of the simplest motions of space-time;which are always stop and go, evolution of information- reproduction through motion; group theory merely ‘fixes’ into still mental perception those rhythms through the ± directions of those motions in time.

I.e. the simplest group is the Isospin, which differentiates a neutron from a proton according to the ‘cyclical angular time-momentum of the particle called spin. So as spin can turn in different directions, and become expanding or imploding ‘pi’ turns, those allowed variations of GST motions up or down (spin), left or right (parity) and so on are the ‘symmetries’ of a group theory which become ‘different particles’, according to the ‘3+0’allowed paths of future for any system that might increase or diminish its ±∆ST elements.


1oth and zero isomorphism: the integration of all planes of existence, around its zero-point or mind.

So we close the cycle and study in the 10th isomorphism all the planes of existence that the being perceives, centred in its point of view, which for man are the 10 scales from forces to cosmos we are aware of. Since Humans are space-time systems and so they can be described with:

1st isomorphism: A Generator, Existential equation of the type SpTƒ that defines its space-time symmetry between Its:

2-manifold spatial organs, and its 3 motions in time (2nd, 3rd isomorphism illustrated above), which defines the world cycle and structural systems of the human organism.

This world cycle thus is a sum of existential åctions, ±∆(e,i), exchanges of spatial energy (motion) and information (form) between different humans that aggregate into Universals, through its 3 ∆±1 relate planes of existence (cellular, individual and social planes). The dynamic exchanges of the elements of those graphs applied to every system of the Universe gives us the meaning of it. The method we use to study them here is the method of the 10=5 qualitative≈logic + quantitative properties of them all.

As all can be defined by a 1)equation that describes 2) its 3 topological organs, 3) its symmetric 3 motions in time 4) its exchanges  of energy and information with other planes that motivate 5) its 5 survival åctions ordered in its world cycle.

Thus we can consider that all what exists is a ‘function of existence’, of space and time, of energy and information performing motions in the 5th dimension.

The longest integrated sequence of such internal and external motion is a world cycle, which externally can be described in 4D as a worldline, a sum of trajectories in external space. yet for its full description we must include the ‘stop’ moments between motions in which the being performs an action, and the internal motions of the being, which through the sum of those ±∆ exchanges of energy and information will suffer a world cycle of life and death:


In the graph, all what exists can be described as a sum across multiple scales of size of motions in the 5th dimension. The type of motions and length of cycles, the relative motion of the being to an external larger world in which it provides åctions for external beings as a relative, O∆-1 infinitesimal point, the inner world controlled by the point in relative still motion to its o-mind with the will to move the whole. All those elements configure its description with the 5+0 isomorphisms of space, time its symmetries, organs and ages, its åctions across 5D planes and the mind-pov which embodies in its logic circuits of linguistic, faster, small time cycles the creation of the future and the game of existence, under its maximizing function:

Max. A = Max  Uw=∫ (∂æ,e,ï,œ,û) ds dt.

This function of existence makes each point of view to maximize its world cycles of existence as a super organisms, Uw, made of a series of åctions of exchange of energy and information, æ,e,ï,œ,û, across its territory in space, ds, and its duration in time, dt, which defines the domain of the Existential function we study.

The sum of åctions of the being is thus existence of the being and carry all the information of it, but we must add those åctions across the 3 relative, ∆-1 cellular/atomic, thermodynamic-organic, ∆+1 social cosmic scales.

And this brief account of man leads of course, to the oth isomorphism,

Since remember, 0 is also a number – the beginning of the new scale, the order of all of them into a single fractal point the isomorphism of the mind.

We have all the elements of reality:

3 Dimension of space, and 3 symmetric ages of time, and 9 planes of scalar space-time, from faster smaller being to larger, slower ones, ruled by the 5th dimension, embedded in a simple equation Sp x Tƒ = ∆±4 which we can also write in a dynamic way as: Sp<=>Tƒ. And the question is rather simple: what do they put together?

Systems, organic systems, either living systems or physical systems or social systems, which are all ruled by the same laws deduced from the properties of those ‘scalar metrics’, those topologies of space and those 3 ages of Time:


10 human scale informative scaleIn the graph we can see from above to below, the metrics of the 5th dimension with the speed of clocks and size of 3 scales, the cosmic, galactic human, and cellular scales, and below we can see how it applies to the human being, which perceives 9 scales, has 3 topological networks symmetric to the 3 ages of life between its birth in the ∆-1 seminal scale and the i-ndividual and ∆+1 social scales.

And we could make a similar drawing for every species of the Universe. Hence the concept central to systems sciences: isomorphism, the analysis of the laws which are common to all species derived of those dimensions of space and time and those organic scales.

We thus shall deal in this section also with the same themes that the other sections, as the Universe is truly self-similar, fractal, repetitive and ultimately made of simple elements.

But here we shall stress more the philosophy and epistemology of Scalar Space-Time, which despite being a logic-mathematical formalism, describes from a philosophical perspective an organic, fractal Universe, as the cellular/atomic elements evolve socially into bigger wholes, molecules, cells, planet sand stars, galaxies.

Thus, the philosophical implications are enormous and multi-faceted so we shall consider them in this section.

General Systems: Its historic origin and predecessors

New 5th dimension

In the graph, the 3 arrows of space-time considered from the perspective of the 5th dimension, upwards in the pyramid, the ‘arrow’ of FUTURE, or wholes, as they co-exist with the smaller beings, and hence, as we increase the complexity of the 5th dimension; the arrow of entropy, with its inverse to the previous arrow, and the arrow of ‘present space-time, which is EACH OF THE PLANES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION, OR width of the pyramid.

From this simple scheme we can deduce many properties and interrelationships between the 3 arrows.

In the graph we can see from above to below, the metrics of the 5th dimension with the speed of clocks and size of 3 scales, the cosmic, galactic human, and cellular scales, and below we can see how it applies to the human being, which perceives 9 scales, has 3 topological networks symmetric to the 3 ages of life between its birth in the ∆-1 seminal scale and the i-ndividual and ∆+1 social scales.

And we could make a similar drawing for every species of the Universe. Hence the concept central to systems sciences: isomorphism, the analysis of the laws which are common to all species derived of those dimensions of space and time and those organic scales.

We thus shall deal in this section also with the same themes that the other sections, as the Universe is truly self-similar, fractal, repetitive and ultimately made of simple elements.

But here we shall stress more the philosophy and epistemology of Scalar Space-Time, which despite being a logic-mathematical formalism, describes from a philosophical perspective an organic, fractal Universe, as the cellular/atomic elements evolve socially into bigger wholes, molecules, cells, planet sand stars, galaxies.

Thus, the philosophical implications are enormous and multi-faceted so we shall consider them in this section.

The 10th dimensional view: sub-systems.


The 10th dimensional view: 3 topologies in space, 3 ages in time, 3 scales of size, and a ‘warping whole’ or mind-program.

In that sense there is a clear more complex formalism of 5th D metric: a 10 dimensional analysis of the 3×3+0 subsystems of most organisms, from the 10 dimensional formulation of the supposedly simplest strings to the 10 Physiological systems of the Human being, in which the 10th system, the nervous system is the whole that integrates all other forms.

10 is indeed the perfect number, the tetraktys of the Pythagorean, 3 x 3 sub-systems dedicated to reproduce, information and energy in the 3 scales with the ‘black bole’ in the center of the 3 triangles, coordinating them all and connecting the system with the above ∆+1 social larger scale.

Any point of view or analysis thus becomes objective when it ads the 10 logic and multiple Language views. If we consider the total truth of a being, 1, a probability that only the being carries in itself we can establish a simple rule for the Organic method:

Max. Truth = Max. Objectivity = Max. Linguistic Logic perspectives on Max. Experimental evidence.

In this manner logic information illuminates Experimental evidence. And this is what most scientists do not respect even if they think they do. As there is always working a subjective, subconscious subliminal interpretation of data to favor the ego paradox, the point of view of the individual, nation or tribe.

Which leads to the next parameter of truth in science:

Cyclical predictability, as all laws of science are based in the cyclical nature of phenomena that do repeat in time, and so we can predict the future of the species we study, as this writer has been doing for decades in all sciences (easily proved in papers, printed books and copyrights at Library of Congress since the 90s), with the theory of time cycles, which includes among many others:

The prediction of the present crashes of the economy (2001-2008-2016 crashes of overproduction of chips and its main software e-money, easily calculated with the classic Volterra equation of ‘saturation of ecosystems’, outlined in this introduction).

-The existence, proportion and nature of dark matter (95% of the Universe), and the dominance of Black holes on the cosmos and the proper understanding of the increasingly accumulated errors of big-bang cosmic theory, and the spooky interpretations of quantum theory.

-The importance of eusocial evolution, based in common languages of information as parts become wholes, only now recognized.

-The existence of topological evolution, which resolves the horizons of species and its ‘strange’ capacity to evolve so fast, so right in so short periods (punctuated evolution, slowly being accepted today), scientifically without need of cuckoo creationism.

-The importance of epigenetics, which implies higher ‘units’ of genetic coding in ‘larger’ ternary groupings, sentences of the genetic code, not only 3 letters to code genes (as time cycles put together ‘space-steps’ into larger ternary cyclical structures, building an architectonical ‘5th dimension’ of parts that become wholes, the TRUE ARROW of future of the Universe.

-And as part of that topological process of evolution, the existence of 3 ‘axial mind races’  derived from the crossing of the lineal, visual, long Neanderthal mind of the white man, the cyclic, informative, wide, verbal Mongoloid and the reproductive, tall, emotional Black mind; and the 3 equivalent ‘human genres’, the verbal woman, the visual man and the emotional child.

A theme, which as we shall see when dealing with the anthropomorphic, ego-centered paradox of humans, especially intense, makes people anger. We, as we all know are the center of the Universe, by decree, and this is the only thing that matters, a fact defined by the equation of the mind:

O-mind(infinitesimal point of view)x ∞ observed universe of space-time cycles=self-centered mind-world:knot of time cycles

Alas, we shall also explain all the syntax and grammar of all the languages of the Universe, and the self-paradox, as we see from our knot of space-time cycles, that all the space-time cycles we see ‘COME TO US’ , the center of the Universe. never mind all other points of view or ‘monads’, are also centers of the Universe, and all of them see only a very reduced part of that Universe, being most of it that 95% of dark matter-energy, structural to the infinitesimal ego that must select information, from his selfish point of view. So alas, each nation, each race, each gender is superior or at best equal to all others.

Funny though is that in the case of human genders and races of the mind they are ‘complementary’. And that is slightly more complex and beautiful, because it obliges them to come together to be ‘better’ as a whole than as parts.

As evolution constantly creates ‘lineal’ entropic, spatial, moving elements; cyclic, temporal, informative ones and crosses them, into ‘present’, reproductive, balanced forms: | xO=Ø, the simplest of all equations of space-time ‘creation’ in the Universe.

Indeed, all is yin=Vishnu=cyclical information x Shiva=lineal energy=yang that combines to create the ∞ fractal space-time beings that configure the Universe (yes we do also explain arts and religions here, even those who are pure bigotry, because all does have a reason when it exists and also a reason why it becomes extinguished). Which bring us to the next parameter of truth:

Coherence: The Whole must be coherent with its parts, it must not require further elements and it must be coherent with the syntax of the languages of the mind it uses to explain reality, which must mirror it. And yes, we shall see how there is a Universal grammar, first understood by Chomsky et al for verbal languages, common to all mind-mirrors, with 3 elements, one for time-information other for energy-space and the third active element that combines them:

Subject (information) < verb (action) > Object (energy of subject).

Red (energetic color code) < green-yellow>blue (informative color code).

F(x): time function = (active operandi that transforms one side into the other) G(y) space function.

Length-motion (space dimension) x Height (informative, time dimension) = Width (reproductive dimension),

which defines the form of most entities of space-time so your spherical, informative time head is in the height dimension, you move energetically in the length dimension, and your bilateral reproduction of cells happens in your width dimension.

AS WE ARE ALL space-time fractals. And the Evidence=Minimalism x Correspondence x Cyclicality x Coherence, method of truth will show you that to be the case: E=Sc³, is the equation of truth, a bit more complex than the one of physicists (-:

All this said 5D strictly speaking is in most of its formal structures a 10 Dimensional theory of 3 spatial components, 3 time ages, 3 scales of size-time speed and a 0-point pegging it all together, but not to scare too much the ‘primitives’ I decided, given the idolatry to Einstein and his 4D concept specially among all those who have no idea of what he meant (the immense majority) to call it 5D.

So we call the 3 dimensions of time, 3 ages, whereas 4D-time is the present age of time. And then we stress the symmetry between the 3 dimensions of space and the 3 dimensions of time.

And we treat the 3 co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, as ‘planes’ or scales (properly scales would be the 10 sub-scales of 10 social groups between planes, such as So=1 individual, S1=10 family of 3 generations, S2=100 tribe-friend networks and so on).

But for a formal analysis of it, most studies will be analysis of systems through 3 scales and 3 ages or 3 scales and 3 spatial organs, and many other 3 x 3 combined analysis with a 0-point that fusions them all.

And since in mathematical equations each ‘variable’ is called a dimension of a ‘phase space’, most formal studies in different sciences, we can consider to be 10 dimensional.

So the 10 Dimensional concepts works much better for the full ® model, and that is how the top-complex formalism of T.Πwas originally written 24 years ago.

So one can imagine if we are still here by 2140, some Chinese congress on 10D (I doubt westerners too much caught on their egos and weapons and jargons and idols of the tribe will ever care for it), will rewrite the whole thing on the proper 10 D formalism.

In that sense 10 Dimensions means today many different formalisms that study systems along 3 space fractal parts, 3 temporal ages, 3 scales of the 5th dimension. 10 parameters to fully describe a system, which are 10 parameters in General relativity 10 parameters in string theory, 10 systems in physiology, 10 is then the number of the game…

We have so far settle down just for the study of 5+5 =10 isomorphisms.

Now this is the formal view. You tell me you want to study a human being? Fine, I give you the generator, and then the 10 physiological systems studied by scientists and then we are in business,

And in each of those systems there will be a Tƒ dominant part, with a o-point, which is the ‘soul-self’ which is from where the actions of space-time of the being depart.

So in the human case we would consider obviously the ‘self’ (never mind where it is exactly in the brain, I have my opinion – which as I haven’t had an entire roaster of researchers and specialists to consult will so far consider opinion not truth), but anyway this self is in the Tƒ-brain for sure, and it is where you decide how to switch between your 5 modular actions never stopping as s formal motion in time, just switching between ∆I (informing yourself, what you do now), ∆e (fed up going to feed you with some food not for thought), ∆æ (moving along your way to the kitchen), ∆œ, what the hell lets have some fun going with my girlfriend in the ultimate final goal of reproduction, and socializing in the path to that goal ∆û with other human beings.

So does the electron where the 3 quantum numbers, solutions to the Schrodinger wave are the 3 ‘dimensions of simple actions’ ∆æ, the principal number, ∆e, the secondary number, ∆I, the 3rd magnetic numbers, ∆o, the reproductive spin, and the external magnetic field (Zeeman effect) will make it all socialize in harmony.

Yes, I have on purpose put you the 2 extreme examples form your point of view, the human ∆o, that you consider by the ego paradox is sooo special, and the minimalist particle known o man the electron (well there is also the photon and the neutrino even smaller but they will also show the same arrows, for example light does have the arrow of motion and reproduction, ∆æ, ∆I, called c-speed, that moves and reproduces the wave, and perpendicular to it, the arrow of energy ∆e, called the magnetic field, and perpendicular to it, the arrow of information, ∆I, called the electric field and so what you call the dimensions of space-time, in your Euclidean space-time light universe are actually for the photon, its function of existence. and what about social life, does a photon have social life? (-; likely more than you if you are reading this text, LOL, sorry well, it is called color, colors are social photons, group of them H plancktons in social frequencies.

So where it is the 5th dimension? All over the place, sustaining us, warping light into particles into atoms into molecules, growing socially into wholes that become units of new wholes.

And all can be explained with the generator.

But we will not sue here, the 10 dimensional formalism, as physicists might complain.

We shall merely consider the generator a 10 dimensional equation, or 10-parameter equation and study the isomorphic laws of all systems in the following order:

o) Defining the minimal ∆-1 point of the being, which starts the process of generation, till emerging as an ∆-whole.

1-3: Spatial isomorphisms: description of the Fractal generator its symmetries of space-time.

1) Defining the Fractal Generator Equation  of this ∆-whole and its ∆ST symmetries.

2) Studying its bidimensional planes of space-time and its dual symmetries.

3) Studying the spatial ternary parts of the system that define it in present space, its symmetry with the 3 ages of time and 3 scales that co-exist together by exchanging energy and information between its asymmetric arrows upwards and downwards.

4-6: Temporal isomorphisms: integration of actions that give birth to the world cycle of existence.

4) Studying how those exchanges of energy and information happens between the relative self-centred, ∆-being and its lower and upper ∆±4 planes of existence

5) Studying its o-point and the will of its actions, which from its perspective are made to increases its energy, information and social evolution, so we talk of 5 ±∆e, i and Social actions (æ,e,i,œ,û) that conform its program of positive existence.

6) Yet the being dies due to the balance of its actions with those of the larger being in which it exists and the fight for existence in a crowded universe where each vital fractal tries to reproduce and grow using others as energy.

Thus the 6th isomorphism studies also the hierarchical structure of inner and outer world of the being and its social classes, which study how those parts, two by two relate to each other (heads with bodies, bodies with limbs, limbs with external fields of energy etc.)

So the total fusion of the being, its inner and outer networks, position within the social classes of the super organism in which it exists, and total sum of actions, brings together the worldcycle of the being. So ultimately the 6th isomorphism wraps it all up, studying its 3 ages of life as a constant travel sum of the integrated actions of existence of he being through its motions on the 5th dimension.

This is the basics of it. And it will give us all the fundamental perspectives of the system, its organic ∆D co-existence its temporal logic causality its spatial, mathematical topology and its mental o-point will.

Then depending on which system we study we will widen this 6 basic analysis with 3 related quantitative or detailed further analysis.

7-9: The 3 quantitative, social, scalar isomorphisms.

The 7th isomorphism studies quantitatively the generator and the relationships between the parts, and its ratios, the Tƒ/Sp density of information and its inverse Sp/Tƒ density of energy, the Sp=Tƒ constant of present actions, etc. Those are elements, which are essential to physics.

Then the 8th isomorphism considering those elements allow us to study varieties, creative variation of the species we must analyze.

While the 9th isomorphism study variations of social evolutions as individuals become parts of decametric wholes, So=individual becomes part of S1:families, part of S2: tribes, part of S3: villages and so on.

0=-10 isomorphism: the limits of the domain, ∆±1 points of existence.

Finally the 10th isomorphism returns to the generator and studies the ∆+1 point of existence, the whole which is made of co-existing 3 planes as wholes, each one with its ternary space-time symmetries.

We can see then that the o-point and 10th point are self-similar and the program has realized its ultimate purpose: to reproduce the information the i-logic system, the being both in space, through waves of reproductive fractals and in time and the 5th dimension through actions, which are reproductions of the mind-point and finally through the construction of a larger whole made to the image and likeness of the smaller being.

Conclusion. Systematizing the fractal Universe and its laws and scales.

Thus we study everything departing from that generator its two fundamental ‘variations’ of space vs. time, its 3 varieties of spatial forms and temporal ages and its 3 planes of existence that generate all systems. In the 5th first isomorphisms in a rather qualitative manner, in the 5th second isomorphisms in more formal quantitative way by considering”

– The dualities of present-space-still-simultaneous-synchronous view vs. the temporal dynamic moving view, and the different back and forth arrows of energy-past and information-future between them, ruled by the 5 postulates of non-Euclidean geometry that define those flows in t he second postulate, its relative nature as Darwinian at or social acts in the 3rd, and so on and so on.

– And the ternary ages and ternary parts in space.

And the 10 social scales of tetraktys from soldiers to caporals to captains to generals toll the magic 1011 number that brings us a whole. So that is the number of galaxies in the Universe, of stars in a galaxy, and for each of the 10 planets of each star more or less that is the number of humans in the planet, of cells in a life being, of DNA ties in a genetic molecule… Variations of course as the game is NOT mechanical but organic, adapted to the survival in each system and whole world occur, but it is fascinating to see how much exactitude occur – the more so when we go down into perfect forms without entropy of energy or information, till arriving to the ideal 0-scale of mathematical logic albeit as Saint Augustine said of the logic of god the mind of the Universe ‘of a higher logic than the Aristotelian Euclidean man)

And so going upward or downwards we do study by breaking in 3 x 3 +0 parts each fractal part reality both ways.

For example man has its 10 physiological systems of which the 0 one that coordinates them all – the black ball in the center of the tetraktys of a billiard plane is the nervous system, and we can divide it further into ternary symmetries.

– For example the ternary symmetries of scale – as each part has 3 subparts, that became other 3 subparts, so for example the nervous system has:

Sp (lineal spinal chord) < ST (medulla) > Tƒ (brain)

And then the encephalon has 3 parts: Sp (cerebellum) < ST (white matter) > Tƒ (grey matter)

And then…

You see this is the formal way: a generator equation, subdivided in 3 x 3 x o elements and then study all its parts and subparts in time and space.

Now because the science of the age, was dominated by the Industrial R=evolution, which then was in the age of creation of hearts of metal (engines, or age of Germany), the new heroes of science were, where the oil and electric motor were discovered.

An there the ego paradox of the ‘animetal enzyman’ that catalyzed the evolution of machines and weapons, the physicist who feel superior to the mathematician and philosopher reached its paroxysm of ego-centered beliefs.

Now the sickness infected mathematics, and since non-Euclidean geometry had made clear the need for a definition in fractal terms of the ill-defined ‘elements’ of mathematics, the point with breath, the lineal wave of communication, the topological network, and the existence of betweeness or not (which implies that a line requires 3 NOT two points to be defined, origin of the ternary symmetries of the Universe, that an elliptic geometry has NOT betweeness, because it is a cycle and the cycle is finite but unbounded, etc. etc. themes those of 5D metric and ¬Æ which go beyond the scope of this post), etc. alas, instead of having a new look at the Universe of Lobachevski pangeometry and its scales discovered by telescopes and microscopes, and describe as we have done the paradoxes of the ‘real 5th dimension’, there it came to ‘imaginative’ mathematicians who decided to scrap completely reality from mathematics.

– So one of them Cantor substituted the point and the social number as units of geometry and algebra by an imagined concept the ‘set’.

– And other Hilbert, said that since he didn’t know how to define points, lines and planes, they must be ‘undefined terms’, ‘imagined’ by the mathematician. It was the birth of modern mathematics.

As usual, when such outrageous ego trips happen (as when hawking imagined his black holes as time machines) the world got first nuts, having a laugh to the big egos. But big egos work a lot, they have an intensity of actions, to impose its knot view, and non-big egos, we are lazy aware of the enormity of the whole, and tend to be Taoist wu-wei, dolce fare niente people, astonished to the intensity of the egos to establish its canonical lies and truths.

So Hilbert and Cantor put together his lunatic forces, and Hilbert said famously ‘that nobody would take us from the Paradise of Cantor sets’ and took Cantor from the mad house where he was living, justly after inventing reality. And alas, they put together all the power of the German Empire in its paroxysm of ego-centered beliefs (reached latter during Hilbert’s lifetime by the Nazi squads) and refurbished the meaning of mathematics, till this day. I recall when I was young selected for the mathematical Olympiads, with a sudden rush of enthusiasm, I sent the solution to the Fermat last theorem, with a brief note, to Nature magazine:

‘I have resolved the problem of Mr. Fermat, my fellow Basque amateur scientist, which he couldn’t scribble in the side of his book note. As you can see, I managed to write it into the margin; just 3 sentences; so if you are so kind to put it as a brief note’. It requires though to understand the bidimensionality of spatial entropy and temporal information, which put together create the holographic Universe (so you will be reading the note in a bidimensional sheet of information). So include a 30 pages addenda on the realist nature of mathematics which merely reflect the structure of the pan-geometry of the Universe.

The proof is indeed trivial. Because the Universe messes bidimensional surfaces of space-time, the superposition rule only works for bidimensional systems, hence X3+Y3 ≠ Z 3 and that fitted in the margin of my book on macro-economics along my existential poems, which I valued more.

Decades latter, with the help of computers, the true mind of the modern scientist, and hundred of pages, some Anglo enzyman found a somewhat longer proof that didn’t fit on the margin not even that of the Britannica (-;

This I said because ‘the Universe is simple but not malicious’, and finite in its sizes, for each scale whose quanta do not go beyond 1011 without moving to another scale and becoming ‘something else’.

So what Lobachevski had proved in his pangeometry, which starts defining finite lines, is that parallels are NOT infinite, and so INFINITE is an indefinable concept, which therefore CANNOT be used in mathematical proofs, and should NOT be considered an element of truth, because we shall ENTER into paradoxes of all kind, as equations BREAK beyond its finite, but unbounded, cyclical form (more properly a Mobius string, if we were to enter into a more precise define of a worldcycle).

So in Germany mathematics had its ego power, but not its reasons – that was in Russia, with Lobachevski, and his insistence that experimental evidence was needed as mathematics was a realist science, and in Austria with Gödel, which would make a fool of Hilbert, and in Britain with Russell which would make a fool of Cantor’s infinity cardinals, and in France with Mandelbrot that will discover the fractal point, so the whole cycle from Descartes to Mandelbrot will be closed – we just put the epilogue.

The paradoxes of set theory merely show Cantor’s concept of infinity is wrong. And this should be obvious to any simple not malicious minds: you cannot compare infinities because they are undefined. The only defined one in a ‘differential manner’ is 0 x ∞, the definition of a constant mind of which there are as many variations as in a differential equation.

You know NOTHING about the real mathematical world, Mr. Hilbert, Mr. Cantor. But now all mathematicians are Hilbertians and Cantorians, what I call Mathematical Hilventors, that is inventors in its ego trip of a false paradise, which does work as all worlds are possible but has little to do with reality, and makes mathematics no longer a world of mind pleasures achieved when the world within us observes as Kant put it in his epitaph, the world outsides it, and finds it to be a focused mirror with no deformation of that larger reality, instead of a twisted elliptic Klein bottle of unending self-twisted unescaping black holes.

Of course the Axiomatic method and sets do have their use specially in algebra, and for specific parts of it, but they do NOT represent the simplicity of the Universe, do NOT reflect the fundamental elements of space, the fractal point, of time, the point-cycle, of the 5th dimension, the social number, and its direct relationship with reality. And the only effect it has had is the separation between people and mathematics, as mathematics became yet another ‘expert’ field, unconnected from reality.

So they have provoked a lack of society’s interest for mathematics, precisely when mathematics through computers have become the fundamental language of power and control of society. For that reason it is imperative that people do understand mathematics and how mathematical logic creates reality.

Let us then escape the metaphoric language and clarify, in simple terms… the fractal principle of creation.

Systems are NOT only defined by its fractal equation in space and time, but ultimately each of its parts is also a super organism with 3 fractal elements in space time and the 5th dimension. And so we can study infinite detailed analysis of each system at all its scales and space-time parts that will become then again elements of a ternary system. So your arm does have a Tiƒ hand, an ST arm and a Sp-elbow. And so on.

Those rules allow the entity to play an interconnected, synchronized role as part of a bigger organism and/or ecosystem, in which it will play its dynamic, causal chains/arrows of existence and life cycles:

Max.Tƒ(seed)->Max.Sp(youth)->Max.Reproduction (Maturity)->Max.Information (3rd Age)->Death(Tƒ->Sp)

But Life cycles can be immortal, if instead of dying after its 3rd Age the entity evolves socially as cell of a higher system communicated with its informative language (Est-1). Then the species will ‘transcend’ into a complex super-organism. Some systems might even attempt a feedback cycle of immortality (Physical particles, simple biological jellyfishes:

I-> ‘—motions’ youth ->reproduction <-’—motions’ Youth…

‘—motions’ (wave) -> Information (Particle) ->‘—motions’ (wave)

And so, with those simple rules we can classify as we shall do in our studies of physical, biological and sociological species of the Universe all the entities of reality and its events.

Recap: The ternary principle explains the creation and diversification fractal super-organisms both in time ages, scalar planes and network-spaces. Space is infinite time is not, time games are less than space. Because the volume of space is bigger than the volume of time all forms have been repeated. And so all is repeated again.


Main symbols of scalar, relational space-time, (its dualities and paradoxes; its laws and symmetries); of i-logic Geometry and existential algebra (its generator and partial equations – isomorphisms).

We include this basic table of fundamental symbols for the spatial and temporal dimensions, its symmetries and fundamental space-time åctions across the different planes of space-time of the Universe, as a reference to the meaning of its main symbols and dualities and ternary symmetries. The table can be used as a reminder of the foundations of Scalar space-time.

The main 2 paradoxes of scalar space-time are:

The Galilean paradox: ∑e=S; ∑Tƒ=I

All can be perceived either as static form or motion. So we must define both states for each being made of ‘formal motions’, either the spatial (fixed distance) motion- energy or temporal (moving cycle) form.

Symbols of space, Time.

_ S; Se : Space-Speed: Spatial, lineal, Euclidean distances, perceived either as fixed space or lineal motion.

Sensu stricto, the correct symbol is S for Space-speed (an scalar distance-motion). In reality most space do have ‘stored’ in the ‘micro-quanta’ of its ‘lower scales’ we do not see in the continuous perception, ‘cyclical points of time’, which form an ‘inertial mass-energy’, stored in the relative vacuum space. Hence Se defines also ‘space’. For example, pure vacuum does have energy because it is likely a ‘sea’ of photons, which ‘surface’ in ‘åctions’ of creation of particles (Heisenberg uncertainty principle). A water space does have molecules of water, their ‘mass’.

– O, 1/T; Tƒ, Tƒ: Temporal Form, Temporal in-form-ation, Cyclical clocks of Time, perceived either as still cyclical forms, or rotary motions.

T is duration, the 4th dimension of classic physics, or lineal time. But lineal time eliminates the fundamental property of time, to be cyclical. So we never use as in the case of S the T symbol alone, as cyclical time is measured by frequency, the inverse of lineal time, T=1/ƒ. So instead we write Tƒ, which is the inverse of T, T=1/Tƒ=1/ƒ, and its units are frequency and angular speed, w.

On the other hand Tƒ is temporal information, which as the case of Se is a combined parameter (so we prefer Tƒ), which includes information, form-in-action, motion.

Some concepts in that sense requires more detailed explanations as they are very restricted in its physical equations but far more extensive in its day to day use. This is the case of ‘energy and information’ using often as synonymous of lineal space-motions and cyclical forms (S and T). This is how most often they are used in general conversation, though we are aware that the mathematical equations are somehow more restricted. So goes with concepts such as entropy and time. So we shall go through lengths to clarify both concepts. We do however like to use energy and information as synonymous of Lineal Space and Cyclical Time, as energy is indeed used constantly to denote lineal motions and information is stored in the cyclical forms and frequency of time cycles, so it has a close relationship.

– Œ,Ø, ST, combined bidimensional space-time element. Œ will be the commonest symbol for a fractal point (spatial perception) or function of existence (temporal perception); the fundamental logic-mathematical unit of the Universe, in the lower scale of undetailed description, which combines a cyclical Tƒ particle-head and a wave-body moving thanks to the energy of motion present in a field-ecosystem.

Thus descriptions of beings can range from the simplest particle-point description of statics, through its relative motion in dynamics/mechanics, further on to its complete description in relationship to an external field. And as we diminish or grow in range other fundamental concepts appear:

-Actions: ∂æ,e,ï,œ,û: they are the external motions of the Œ in the larger space-time World, ST, with a purpose and a sequential order:

ƕ: The point first perceives, ƕ with rotary motion, o, from a point of view of an O-bserver.

∆a: Then as it perceives a motion that changes its relative ecosystem/territory/fields, it moves, accelerates or decelerates, ∆a.

∆e, ∆ï: And the motion takes it into a prey-predator exchange of energy event, or a parallel event that transfers information between two points, which in its whole expression becomes:

∆œ: an act of reproduction of an individual, iterated as an invariant form of the original being. We distinguish small ∆ï exchanges of information, from complete ∆œ reproductive åctions proper.

∆U: finally thanks to those acts of social reproduction and communication of information a whole Organism, a Universal U is created from the sum of an infinity of individuals: 1010 i=U

‰ U±1; a topological plane≈network of ∆-points and its Super-organism, which is made of 3 such networks, extended through 3 scales of space-time, the cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic, social/gravitational scales.

W:Worldcycle. It is the maximal description of the being, across all its planes, through all its åctions, through all its networks, along all its duration, between life and birth

Spe, energy, Tiƒ, information:

We might say that both are ‘combined parameters’ (energy includes mass or charge or any other cyclical particle so it does have a time component, and information transfers through waves, is form in motion, so it has a lineal, spatial parameter, but energy is dominant in lineal motion, so work discharges the forces that do not act on the line-motion and information is dominant in form, as a wave keeps its form as energy fades away). We cannot make concepts more simple and less ambivalent without simplifying too much the paradoxes and dualities and multiplicities of functions and combinations of space and time parameters, since those ‘combinatory operations’, is what the Universe does to create and iterate and differentiate its infinite existential beings departing only of 3 elements, space, time and its social scales and universal planes.

Partial equations: inverse properties of: Se vs. Tƒ, which merge Se≈Tƒ, to create the ∞ varieties of Space-time.

Lineal, spatial energy is the inverse of cyclical temporal information. But both together form constant dynamic systems. And so we write that duality which generates all systems of the Universe with different equations:

Œ=S/T=K; ∂s/∂t; Se< =>Tƒ; Œ=Se x Tƒ;   S≈T, Sp≈Tƒ; Sp x Tƒ = ST;   Se x Tƒ = ST ≈ ST±4 etc.

All those varieties of the Fractal Generator of Space-time play with some basic symbols that express the 2+1 ternary elements of reality (Space≈ Energy, Time≈ Information and its infinite combinations. So we shall consider the main symbols for those 2 formal motions and its ternary combinations, either described as ‘dimensions’ or ‘motions’ of space-time (Galilean Paradox).

Now the reader should understand why we use for each main formal motion and scale of reality at least a couple of ambivalent symbols. Since we want to convey the complexity, duality and ternary principles of the fractal Universe in which most systems have 2 or 3 functions and different interpretations, depending on how we see it (from an external or internal point of view, in motion or as a form, in terms of information or energy, speed or size, etc.). At the beginning it might seem paradoxical, because the Universe is paradoxical and perhaps confusing, but this confusion is needed for the reader to change its chip from a merely quantitative, limited, reductionist analysis of reality to a more complex, logic, paradoxical, biological, organic understanding, which includes as a ceteris paribus analysis (correspondence principle) the more limited but exact quantitative equations of classic science, explained in its whys thanks to the qualitative paradoxical analysis.

Symbols of the scales of the 5Dimension: ST; U±4;

ST; Bidimensional Space-Time , which combines a dimension of space and one dimension of time. The 3 main varieties are:

Sp: Past, entropic, dominant planar or toroid surface.

ST: Present, repetitive, balanced hyperbolic wave-body, and general form of the åctions, which exchange energy and information between 2 points (transversal wave) or a line and a point (conic trajectory)

: Head/particle/informative nuclei, which processes logically in a faster, smaller space the cycles of the external world mapping them into a logic knot that develop the future åctions of the system.

5D, ST, U(0-9); S ∆±4: 5th dimension; Scalar Space-Time: a series of ‘scales of space’ of increasing size and diminishing speed of information and vice versa, which structures the Universe across relative bidimensional planes of space-time, which put together create the 5th dimension.

Why we use several scales? Tƒ convey the complexity of the 3 arrow of time. Those scales depart from a regularity caused by the perfect form of a 10 number (tetraktys) which is the commonest number to emerge as a social whole, with all the full functions of a vital Space-time system. And so the social scales is a decametric scale, which after 10 scalar growths, creates a society of 1010 points, which becomes a new Plane of Existence, a whole, somewhat separated from its parts which become identical infinitesimals. Thus 1010 u= U+1

Further on, since the fundamental co-invariant law of the 5th dimension is in the inverted properties of space and time, such as the product of the spatial size and temporal cyclical frequency, remains constant: S/T= C, S x Tƒ = C, it follows that the arrows of information (Tƒ) and Size are inverted. Further on uncertainty principles make the human scale the relative ‘0’ point, of maximal perception. So we can classify according to the ternary principle scales in 3 relative time arrows.

As such 3 symbols and scales are used:

5D for the 5th dimension and its infinite scales of space and temporal information.

ST, abb. U, i: I(9-0):

Planes of scalar space-time from future to past are ordered according to its quantity of ‘information’, I, which makes paradoxically, smaller beings, with faster time clocks of information, such as the genetic scale compared to the human scale, or the quantum scale compared to the galactic one, ‘planes of space-time’ of higher information. The scale is logarithmic in base 1011, and goes from 10 (light forces that transfer information at maximal speed) to 0 (above the local Universe, which we cannot perceive hence have zero information from the human perspective).

5D fractal space-cyclical time

In the graph, we grow in information as we diminish in scale (informative arrow) and inversely we diminish in Size, S. Yet, for larger wholes to exist, smaller systems must have appeared first. So we define an arrow from past (smaller systems) into future (whole systems) and consider the U scale to move from 9 (max. information: electromagnetic space) to 0 minimal information (the entire Universe.)

U, U(0-9): Scale of size, from past to future. It is the more intuitive scale, from parts to wholes and the most used. The S-scale moves from 0-forces to 10-Total Universe inverted to the scale in information that moves from 10-forces to 0-Universe. It will be the standard scale when nothing is mentioned.

Planes of scalar space-time ordered from smaller ‘individual, informative quanta’, into bigger wholes, or ‘Universals’, the Universal scale is based in size, and so it is inverse to the ST scale, making the whole Universe, the 10th scale of maximal size and the quanta of forces (strings and h-plancks) the smaller 0-1 scale.

Thus both scales are inverted, as it always happens when we compare space vs. time, entropy vs. information; since the fundamental law of the Universe is the inverse properties of lineal-spatial motions vs. cyclical, temporal ones.

We do use as standard scale the Stu of size, so unless we write ST=x, it is understood that the ST5 numerical symbol defines a logarithmic 10 up to 11 scale of increasing size; whereas only ‘5’ the human scale is the same going upwards in size or downwards in information.

So ST10 means the Universal Scale; ST9: The local, perceived cosmos, ST8, the galaxy, ST7, the stars and cosmic bodies, ST6, the planet and global societies, ST5, the human being and geological formations, ST4, the cell and the states of matter, ST3 the molecules, ST2, the atom, ST1 the light forces, and Tƒ, the string/gravitational invisible scale.

The reader should notice that ST10 and ST0 are both beyond our range of perception and perhaps units of a smaller and larger new Universal scales.

If we use the informative scale the numbers will be inverse. So ST=10 is the force scale, and ST=5 the human scale both in the U∆ and ST 5D frames of reference.

In reality ‘systems’ are made as Russian Dolls, by the coming together of a lower plane of energy-information minimal quanta, which sustains a larger plane of ‘whole’ networks.

So the Universe is in fact a nested system, such as the smallish quanta and bits of energy and information are the components of the larger Planes of space-time. Thus we write the main systems also in reference to the human scale, which is considered the ST=5 scale. So we write:

ST±4, ∆±4; U±4. On the other hand, if we consider the human organic plane of existence (which in matter is equivalent to the thermodynamic plane of states of matter), we can create a scale of relative upper and lower scales, which not being commutative (the perception of the Individual is different according to

In the graph, ST±4 ,or ∆±4, or u±4, which is the scale removed 4 planes of size above and below humans, which is the scale of the Universe and its gravitational ‘string quanta’. To notice that in this manner both scales, the logarithmic informative and size scales are equal, only that in ∆±4, ∆+4 is the string quanta and in u±4, u+4 is the Universal quanta.

The difference of scale is obvious. We introduce in those analysis the ‘human Observer’. Since the pretentious sense of absolute truth of the humans’ simplified continuous single space-time plane vanishes when we have to perceive Universal Planes above and below us which do not transfer all the energy and information, as events of space-time in the same Universe do.

This causes a difference of perception, elliptic above, toroid below.

We normally use all other terms followed by the ± element to signify we are biased by our human center of view, which becomes the O-bserver of science, whose mind therefore ‘changes’ the observable (or vice versa, in the anti-quantum paradox of social sciences).

All this leads to the understanding of systems in mere geometrical forms, as the 3 parts of a system become frames of inertial reference of spherical, hyperbolic and toroid form:

Ox– = Ø:    O (spherical coordinates, head-particles)x – (lineal, planar, coordinates, limbs-fields) = Ø-hyperbolic coordinates/body-wave

Dimensions and symmetries of ‘holographic’ space-time.

Sl, Sw, St: The 3 dimensions of space, Long, lineal motions; wide-wave dimensions/motions; tall-high/dimensions-motions.

They are symmetric to the 3 ages/dimensions of Time:

Sl->Te; <: Entropic, energetic, expansive, past motions. Te is the organic, present spatial symbol, < the dynamic symbol.

Sw-> ST: present, repetitive, wave-like åctions. ST is the organic, present spatial symbol, = the dynamic symbol.

U->Tƒ, >, Tƒ: Informative, old, future motions. is the organic, present spatial symbol, > the dynamic symbol.

Both symmetric dimensions create bidimensional Space-time membranes, which are the organic components of all systems. Since Time dominates space, we use the temporal dimension to define them:

Se: Energetic motions or the Limbs/fields that perform them; Spe elements can be attached to the system (limbs) or external to it (fields), often both interacting together. We capitalize S the dominant element.

ST: Reprod-active motions or the wave/bodies that perform them. We capitalize both and offer two options. Short derived åctions, ST, and long complex reproductive åctions, ST.

Tƒ:: informative motions or the head/particles that perform them. We capitalize T, the dominant element of the plane. This is the future, commanding element of the system.

Non-Euclidean definitions.

When we build the Universe strictly in mathematical terms, we use Non-Euclidean ‘i-logic’ geometry. As this geometry is defined by fractal points with parts, as opposed to Euclidean points with no breath, and its causal relationships respond to non-Aristotelian ‘multiple’ ternary past-present-future time arrows, we give it the next A->e->i name.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = Spacetime mapping.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

As 2 of its ‘difficult’ postulates, the 3rd of similarity and the 5th of flows of motion and form entering the point are not really geometric but causal, logic, we call the mathematical upgrading of the human mind i-logic geometry (as we call its symbolic representation ‘existential algebra’). The 5 postulates of i-logic geometry are expressed with 5 specific symbols, which represent iconically its meaning:

1st Postulate Fractal point in space and function of existence in time: Œ.

Definition of points with informative and energetic, formal and motion, head and limb, particle and field/wave parts, the symbol referring to the cyclical time-closed part, O and the lineal spatial, motion limbs, º, to form together a Œ fractal point.

2nd Postulate: ≈: Definition of lines of points with parts as waves:

3rd Postulate: ‡. Definition of similarity. As we cannot assess absolute identity, since we do not perceive all the inner parts of the point, we must judge similarity in terms of similarity on the perceived equality, which brings social, parallel behavior between individuals or perceived dissimilarity which brings perpendicular, Darwinian behavior (which in case of predator events means indeed perpendicular contact and penetration and destruction of one point by other. So we use a symbol which shows both, parallel and perpendicular behavior: ‡

4th Postulate: ‰ Planes are now networks of points, connected by lines of energy and information. In its most complex form they mess 3 energetic, informative and reproductive ‘networks’ that give birth to an organic ‘topology’, a world, a relative Universe. So of the available qwert symbols, we use a symbol that has 3 type of points and a line, ‰ .

5th Postulate: ¢, we use for the 5th Postulate, similar to the 1st – definition of a fractal point – but perceived from the inner perspective of the flows of energy and information perceived by a point, a circular symbol which offers an aperture on the equator – the commonest region to absorb energy in any point of the Universe, and a polar axis, the commonest region to absorb and emit information.

The 3 functions of Non-Euclidean Points: Worldcycles: W= ∫ Œ dt= ∫ A dt

Actions of scalar space-time.

∑ ST ≈ ST: repetitive, cyclical åctions of space-time, which combine energy and information, Lineal and Cyclical motions. Space-Time åctions exchange energy and information between the being and the different ST, Stu, scales of the Universe. Because we act with micro and macrocosms, we relate to those other scales of space-time, reason why we consider ‘5’ vowels, to express each of those 5 åctions:

Aa, Ae, Ai, Ao, Au, or ∆a, ∆e, ∆œ, ∆o, ∆u or ∂a, ∂e, ∂I, ∂o, ∂u. As we use A for action, or ∆, ∂ for the mathematical definition of those åctions which are for each being:

– The increase of its ∆a: accelerated motions or ‘external energy increase’; which happens by interaction with the furthest ‘Universal plane’: ∆a: U±>∆

– ∆e: energy, absorption, feeding, or internal energy increase

Рƕ: information, or internal form perception

– ∆œ: reproductive offspring, or internal information reproduction and…

– ∆u: social evolution into Universals or growth from scale.

Those are the 5 fundamental åctions all Œ-systems of the Universe perform in order to survive by replenishing its inner and outer energy and information, reproduce and become a stronger social whole.

Social Scales vs. Universal Planes.

In strict sense, we should always talk of Universal Planes, for the Stu (or even ST) scales. We use though often the term scale and scalar space-time. But sensu stricto, the concept of social scales MUST be used for the different U= 10 U-1 social scales of growth between to Universal planes, U=1011 Stu-1

That is, systems evolve in decametric scales to reach an organic new social plane or ‘Universal’. So for example, humans evolved from So=1 individuals into S1=10 families, into S2=100 clans, into S3=1000 tribes and so on till reaching S10=10 billion global society, the one we are reaching now. So happens for DNA molecular ties, Stars in galaxies and cells in organisms. Since roughly speaking (though there are many varieties explained in detail in the texts), systems do evolve through 3 x 3 +1 ages and population scales in time and space. And a great deal of knowledge is achieved in the study of those scales for each system and the languages of information used to put together parts into wholes.

Here again we find the duality of space and time, energy and information. So we can consider two ‘social scales’, the spatial, population, social scale, S(1-10) which focuses in the number of individuals a society has, its population in space. And we can consider also the L, or I, linguistic, informative order, which shows the evolution of social groups according to the 3 ‘linguistic ages of information’, the genetic, geographic and organic ages which use languages of increasing complexity. So we talk of:

S10 ≈ L3 (10 scales of population, 3 linguistic ages) -> Stu1, create a new Universal Plane.

Œ: Functions of Existence, Organisms and Worldcycles.

Because those spacetime cyclical åctions are the natural unit of the Universe, which we perceive in whole, they are the fundamental analyzed element of reality. For example physics makes an exhaustive analysis of Aa, åctions of motion, which are the simplest of them. Optics studies åctions of information that collapse and integrate ¥-rays into focused mappings, images of reality in a zero point, crystal or mind. Sociology studies in depth the ∆u åctions of social evolution of humans from So, the individual through S1, the family, S2, the clan, S3, the tribe, upwards till the present human global society of around 0.7 x 1010 elements, which foresees the creation of a whole new Social global plane.

Actions thus are the main unit of study, both externally, considering the motion of a point in a cyclical trajectory and internally, considering the purpose of that motion. Absolute Space-time sciences care little about the inner reasons given by the evolutionary program of existence, sum of all those åctions. We do, as the program reveals the structure through time of a function of existence, its purpose and sequential causal order. Thus we define the integral of all the åctions in sequential time of a being as its worldcycle, sum of all those cyclical åctions, performed one after the other:

Worldcycle: W: Πintegrated in time.

W= ∫æ,e,ï,œ,û dt

This being one of the most practical expressions of the Existential function in time.

The ‘worldcycle’ of life and death that expresses the existence on time and space of any entity of the Universe. And it is better expressed, when we consider that the sequential order of those åctions, is clearly organized as a series in which each type of action dominates a certain age. Thus the conception age is ∆œ, the creation of a seminal point of pure information, which will reproduce and emerge in the life system, by reproducing those cells with free energy, living then a young age of pure motion. So we move from: ∆œ->∆e,∆a (fetus and youth) ->∆œ, till the being enters adulthood and reproduces, in the mature age where e and I balance each other e=I, maximizing the production, perhaps the most clear expression of the function of existence, exi. And so finally the being in its adulthood, with a family and an extended network of connections with the world, enters the old age of maximal social evolution and information, ∆u

Thus, the sequential combination of those action ages, gives us an equation that develops the World cycle in terms of the use of its ‘vital space’ to perform those sequential åctions.

If we call the total vital space of a being, its ‘Total Energy+Information’ (which in physical systems is equivalent to the Kinetic energy (Se) and its internal and potential energy (Tƒ)), then we can establish an equation that vibrates between both poles Se <= >Tƒ, from Max. Tƒ (conception), to max. Se (youth) to balanced Se=Tƒ (adult) to max Tƒ (old age of information) to death (Max. Se: erasing of information back to energy in death).

Thus the worldcycle the fundamental event of all systems of the Universe, writes in a more complex detailed form the dynamic 3±∆ ages of any space-time cycle:

∆-1 (Conception) ∑ Sp x Ft (fetus) = Speu (youth) < STu (maturity) > Tƒu (3rd age) <<∑ST-2 (Death)


Superorganism: U±1: Œ integrated in space.

But the existential function can also be expressed in space, and then we use the organic ternary expression as each Œ, is a 0-point, composed of 3 ∑networks, one that provides energy-motion, either limbs or fields, one that provides sensorial information and one reproductive body-wave network. So we write:

Œ =Tƒ < ST> Se, or Se<=> Tƒ, or Se x Tƒ = ST±4, and many of the spatial varieties.

Which is the definition of a superorganism, the integration of multiple space-time cycles across 3 scales, U±1.

Spe< ST>Tƒ is a more dynamical temporal expression, which also represents the ‘3 ages’ of a worldcycle of existence, the energetic, entropic young age dominated by the Spe (field/limb) systems, the ST Reproductive, or rather reprod-active system, of cyclical åctions which represent the dynamic present life of the system, and the Tƒ informative membrane-head dominant in the 3rd age of the system.

The function of existence is therefore an spatial, organic, visual description of the 3 parts of any system.


Other Varieties of the Generator Equation

The main symbols of fractal, relational scalar space-time are then combined in equations of existential algebra, to express the laws represented by those isomorphisms, which are ‘partial’ equations of the Generator Equation of the Universe, and any possible event. We use then the symbols > for expansive motion that becomes informative form (future arrow), < for informative point that becomes expansive motion (Past arrow), and = for repetitive, present motions.

We consider here the main expressions of the Generator equation that represents all ternary events and ternary organs of all systems in time and space, across the ±4 relative planes of existence of the being.

We use mainly 2 simplified expression, for philosophical, qualitative analysis and quantitative, geometrical one:

Tƒ ExI=ST, which is the ‘function of existence’ of all systems, written also in a more complete form as Tƒ<∑ Sp x Tƒ = ST±4 Needless to say it has been chosen by its acronym name, but it does represent the fundamental elements of any system, its relative energy and information, which form together a ‘stable’ Space-Time being across ±4 relative planes in which the system will enact its åctions of motion, perception, feeding, reproduction and social evolution. In essence the 3 elements of all systems are represented in that simple acronym:

Tƒ: the Informative head; ExI, the body that exchanges and combines energy and information as it reproduces the system, and ST±4, the external field from where it extracts its bits and quanta of information and energy to perform its åctions. Thus Tƒ Exist is indeed to be made of 3 ‘organic’ varieties of bidimensional space-time, the Tƒ zero-point (head/particle), the body-wave of energy and information (ExI) and the larger limbs/fields of space-time from where the system extracts its existential åctions, bits and quanta.

This expression of the Function of Existence is also used whenever we discuss in philosophical, qualitative terms the different events, forms and elements of the 5th dimension.

Existential Algebra

It follows then that what we call existence all its events and forms can be deduced from different partial equations, developments in time and space and combined operations obtained manipulating the two previous equations of existential algebra.

The set of equations derived from that existential algebra, which every system in the Universe follows are the isomorphisms of reality. And we can group them in 10 isomorphic sets of laws.

Let us then consider the 10 main partial equations derived from the Generator equation of the Universe, or ‘isomorphisms of nature’:

Isomorphisms, Invariant Laws, informative similarities.

Finally the common sets of isomorphic, invariant laws of scalar space-time that all systems of the Universe followed are numbered and grouped with 10 numerals, which are related to its ‘varieties’.

The main of those isomorphisms are in bold, and correspond to the ‘common’ properties/dimensions of space, time and the scalar space-time åctions all systems perform:

1st. ExI≈st

The isomorphism that defines the duality of motion and form of all systems (Galilean paradox), represented with the equation of existence: Ex I = ST, which considers the 4 fundamental parameters we use to explain the Universe, energy (space in motion), information (time cycles seen in stillness), Space (lineal energy seen as distance) and time clocks (form in cyclical motion).

  1. Spe< ST>Tƒ

The 2nd, or spatial isomorphism that defines the bidimensional varieties of space-time that structure all organs, and it is the 2nd isomorphism since they are 2-manifold varieties. And since there are only 3 bidimensional topologies, there are only 3 type of organs: toroid, entropic, moving systems; hyperbolic, wave-like reproductive bodies and informative closed spheres and central zero points.

  1. The worldcycle isomorphisms: Speu (youth) < STu (maturity) > Tfu (3rd age)

The 3 ages/dimensions/horizons of time are the 3rd isomorphism of the Universe, with its past-entropic, future-informative and present, repetitive time phases of any time cycle:

  1. ST±4: Planes of Existence.

The 4 isomorphism is the isomorphism of the ∆±4= 9 Universal planes in reference to man’s perception between the invisible, 0-10 strings and non-local Universe.

  1. ∂(æ,e,ï,œ,û)

The 5th isomorphism is the isomorphism of the 5 åctions any system performs through its relative, ∆±4 relative planes, interacting with them to extract energy and information:

Aa: ∆±4 (changes in accelerations, decelerations and speeds, due to the interaction of the system with the gravitational forces of the U±4 nested scale (cosmos and gravitational forces).

Ai:∆±3 (changes in perception by interaction with the U±3 plane of galaxies and electromagnetic light.

Ae: ∆±2: absorption of inner cellular quanta, as energy from the relative world, in the human case amino acids obtained by hunting in the external world.

Ao: ∆+1->i: reproduction of a seminal offspring on the lower cellular/atomic plane of higher information to give birth to a new individual…

Au: ∆u+1: social evolution into a higher Universal plane with similar individuals.

  1. The 6th isomorphism, perhaps the less important describes the ‘relative value’ which for the individual has the fractal points of those scales, which are the relative social parts of its system, from the dominant ∆+1 social scale to the lower, ∆-4 invisible force quanta.

In that regard there should be 6 relative ‘classes’, 3 internal and 3 external to the being:

The Max.Tƒ head, which controls as the point of future the ExI, ST active body or present system, which together control and ab=use the limbs/fields that move the system. Those are the 3 physiological networks/systems that create any organism, and are internal to the being.

In terms of ‘planes of existence’, they are determined by their cohesion or degree of connectedness as wholes. The Tƒ is a network system, so we often write it as ∏Tƒ (as all neurons are connected creating a whole): U+1. The body is a herd system, with loose connections between cells, or ∆≈U, and the limbs/fields are herds of unconnected ∑ u-1, expendable parts (so even in the most organized living systems, simple animals can loose and regenerate a tail or teeth).

Then we have the 3 smaller, external classes, the invisible U±4 forces, the perceivable, U±3 informative bits and the U±2 energy quanta absorbed as bricks of internal construction of the being. Those 3 ‘social classes’ are entities in themselves but the individual has zero care for them, destroying the U±2 organism to obtain its quanta (Darwinian, perpendicular prey: ‡), collapsing the U±2 bits of information to create mental mappings (so we collapse light into electrons to perceive) and drifting on the invisible sea of forces along a gradient in steady, parallel orbits and perpendicular, accelerating and decelerating trajectories to displace on the Cosmic U±4 highest/lowest plane of existence).

  1. The 7th isomorphism studies the quantitative main vital, or universal constants that define in any system the relationship between its different parts (ratios of exchange of energy and information, social number of universal evolution, etc.)

Along with the isomorphisms of spatial dimensions, temporal ages, åctions through planes of existence, and the O-point or mind isomorphism, it is one of the 5 key isomorphisms of systems, as it defines each ‘variety’ of existence and so adapts the Generator Equation to each specific science, its jargon and quantitative analysis.

It does connects Scalar Space-Time with classic sciences. For example, in a biological organism, the dynamic/structural generator equation and its 3 organic varieties, Spe<ST>Tƒ : Spe x Tƒ = ST, represents Limbs < (Body) > Head; and there exists for each variety a certain proportionality between them, which differentiates different species, such as for example, the human being, which has the highest ratio of head to body-limbs in weight and a 1-9 ratio in size (as Leonardo shows in its Vitruvian man).

8: 23=4×2… We consider the laws of creation of all systems which happen according to the ‘dualities’, ternary symmetries between space and time dimensions, its combinations and the 4 ‘numbers/letters/laws, etc.’ which code the action of systems, from quantum numbers to genetic letters.

  1. The isomorphism of the social scales in a Universe of decametric social groups in which the ‘10’ as in a tetraktys is the social center that ‘emerges’ as unit of a lower scale. So 10 soldiers have a caporal, which is the unit of 10 units that form a century, and so on. So we write   10 U ≈U+1
  2. are therefore the 10 planes of reality in which all its species follow the previous isomorphisms. So we write Ux1010 ≈U+1

0 is the zero point, or center of any system in which the will of its åctions and consciousness of the whole exist.

This is the other fundamental isomorphism, as any system, which creates a zero point, survives better. Its equation is O (infinitesimal mapping) x ∞ (external world) = Ci (Constant informative mind) and it is derived mathematically from the Poincare conjecture, that is, a spherical Tƒ bidimensional variety of topology can shrink without deformation creating a mapping of the Universe.

Again zero points might not exist or be unfocused but then the system survives worst. So Crystals in which the zero point image does exist dominate all solid, physical systems, from planets to rocks, while amorphous rocks last less in time. And this proves again the unity of nature and all its systems, regardless of its varieties.

But zero points also diminish the survival chances of any species, by creating a subjective mapping which undervalues the power of other living systems, as the projective geometry of mind mappings (Desarguian mathematics), makes the closest nose bigger than the entire Andromeda galaxy. Thus the ego paradox limits the survival of beings which do not assess objectively the world dangers in which it lives. This of course is happening also to mankind which evolves metal-minds (robots, computers, internets), of higher existential momentum/force and even tries to make black holes on Nuclear devices (the top predator momentum of the Universe).

All systems of the Universe thus can be fully generated and described in time space, åctions and scales by the study on how those 10 isomorphic sets of laws derived of its scalar space-time nature apply to each variety of existence, which ultimately represent a program of existence of 5 åctions, ∂æ,e,ï,œ,û represented in the different perceptions of the Existential function, ∑ Sp x Tƒ = ST±4

The enormous task of doing so will improve accordingly the chances of survival of any species, which understands in this manner the Universe. Man has not and this writer now in his Tƒ 3rd age close to its Stu-2 demise had tried his best to communicate those laws but it has failed. This web is meant to be his legacy for humans or computers, which might or might not inherit the Earth (if top predator black holes do not). There is thus little pride on my ‘existence’ which failed in its highest action (∂u: social interaction with mankind), but on my view the blame is partial, as the ego paradox might be perhaps the fundamental character of humans, which I have never been able to crack.

This is what we study in this web, the first line, a general introduction to scalar space-time, the program of existential åctions and the superorganisms, created with them.

The 2Nd line, a more advanced course on scalar space-time through the detailed analysis of all its 10+0 isomorphisms.

And the 3th line, a rewriting of the main disciplines of sciences, with those laws, astrophysical worlds (physical sciences), Biological systems and human sciences (human systems and mechanical systems, the economic world of machines).which will always be a work in progress, the pouring of the Britannica encyclopedia DVD version (-; into the scaffolding of cyclical space-time, that is, the study of the 10 U, U-niversal planes from forces to cosmos, through the 10 sets of isomorphic laws, all of them obey.

T.Œ: Vital, social nature of time and space and its ¬Æ-formalism.

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 19.47.20TŒ is based on the cyclical nature of Time and fractal structure of space evident to all systems. This Organic Structure is both Simplex but also Ternary Complex due to the 3 arrows-dimensions of time, it symmetry with the 3 organic parts of all systems, and the ternary structure of the scales of the 5th dimension that co-exist together in organic systems.

Thus the ternary Cyclical=repetitive nature of fractal space-time systems and events becomes the constrain and cause of all the laws of Science and T.Œ merely systematizes those laws by extracting them from the fundamental space, time elements of reality.

Then in each of those scales of space-time, we find that the common laws of 5D space-time Correspond with the laws of the species of each scale and its previous theories.

So all this, we resume in a formula, T.Œ=SC3 that embeds those Principles of Philosophy of Science that all Organic Time-space Systems Follow, born of the duality between the Simplex, S, principles and the ‘ternary Complexity’, C3 by repetition of those events.

We resume the postulates of the scientific method in a simple formula:

Œ=Sc3: Objectivity, Linguistic, Isomorphic Perspectives, Experimental evidence = Simple, Minimalist, truths – Ockham’s razor, Correspondence Principle, Cyclical repetition – Predictability and Complexity born of the ternary, fractal constant subdivision of reality into parts).

Now of those ‘elements’ 2 are brought about by T.Œ to the classic elements of the scientific method, ‘Linguistic Isomorphisms’, that hidden dual I and L between the O and the E of Œ (-:

That is, we can to verify further a truth consider different linguistic perspectives (mathematical, logical, mental and Organic, according to the 4 fundamental elements of all systems: its spatial symmetry, its temporal ages, its organic co-existence in 3 scales of the 5th dimension and the existence of a central point of view or 0-point that orders and focuses the program of 5 space-time survival actions that all systems perform to continue into existence).

All those point of views harmonize each other and reinforce the existence of a being. And they are the origin of the 5+5 qualitative and quantitative isomorphisms we use to describe all systems of reality). So we shall apply that methodology as we have done with other systems to astrophysics to describe the Universe and prove that is all what we need to describe reality.

So we have to adapt present theories of the Universe to the 5Dimensional, fractal, cyclical nature of space-time.

How the present Cosmic theory of reality, the big-bang Paradigm fits within that scheme?

Surprisingly enough it rather fits easily, but at present, it shows also some contradictions and limits which might be considered faults of ‘Objectivity’ mainly due to the anthropomorphic desire to explain it all from the human limited perspective.

So while we will introduce the translation of the Big-bang to 5D astrophysics, which would be a bone to get 5D accepted by mainstream science, we will be ‘objective’ to the extreme and conclude that while the big bang is a possible theory of the Universe, in the cyclical, commonly accepted version (with inflation and a final big crunch end, so it becomes a constant cyclical Universe) there is a more objective vision of the Universe, ‘absolutely relative’, and enlarged with infinite scales of space-time, in which the big-bang or an alternative cosmic Universe of trillions of galaxies, in which the cosmic explosion should be just a local phenomena of a local Universe, represent merely another scale of physical systems, as those of quantum particles, molecular atoms, states of matter and cosmic bodies.

Again, this concept is also handled profusely by astrophysicists, albeit by the obvious problem of lack of evidence, at the theoretical level, with the concept of a lower scale – the Planck scale of strings belong the particle scale of the 5th dimension and a larger scale above the galactic scale – of cosmological strings, in correspondence with the world of micro-strings.

We won’t analyze that level beyond considering some necessary corrections in a Universe of ‘background independent space-times’, as it is purely theoretical, and so this post will be dedicated to the analysis of the big-bang from the cyclical, fractal nature of space-time and the highlighting of its ‘scientific problems’, from the perspective of philosophy of science and the rules of epistemological truth we have summarized in the 6 rules of the mnemonic formula, Œ=mc2 (objectivity, Evidence, etc.)

Along the way of course we shall introduce key findings of T.Œ: the unification equation of charges and masses, the nature of particles and anti-particles, the role of background neutrinos in the Universe, the reason of the 3 families of masses and its symmetry with the 3 families of cosmic bodies, the likely nature of dark energy and dark matter, within the parameters of 5D astrophysics, etc.

Non Aristotelian minds. 

“In these introductory remarks, I am going to tell about some of the successes and I shall also detail what the principal critics said about The World of Null-A. Let me hasten to say that what you shall read is no acrimonious defense. In fact, I have decided to take the criticisms seriously”   The World of Null-A.  Van Vogt

The mind is aristotelian self-centred in its point of view, with a single arrow of time, its internal vital desire to exist as long as possible, maximise its function, Max. E xI body and mind, grow and multiply. The universe is a game of infinite monads, and so it is NON-æ, varying in perspective with minds of different non-Ae constructs. Of the tension between the individual selfish particle and the whole, social herd, the 2 restricted and wider subjective and objective few of reality arises:

112In the graph, when it comes to the difference between a linguistic o-mind and the ∞ Universe, that is between a linguistic world and the whole energy nd information cycles of reality, the relationship can be described in terms o logic, considering that minds, are Æ, aristotelian, with a single causality centred in the self, and Euclidean or rather Cartesian, with a single space-time frame of reference, centred in that self; while the Universe is Non-Æ, with infinite fractal points of view, space-time planes, co-existing organically, flows of energy and information, all of them diffeomorphic and local, yet obeying a global ‘logos’, the game of Non-Æ vital topologies described in this blog.

The Universe is logic in time, mathematical in space. Logic mathematics thus becomes the fundamental language of ‘STience’, the study of space-time beings, which become in itself a tautology.

But what kind of logic mathematics? obviously one that upgrades present euclidean mathematics of a single space sheet, and Aristotelian logic of a single causal arrow of space-time to the more complex fractal space, cyclical time and ternary space-time symmetries which make up the existence of all of us, finite space-time beings.

Since the ‘dimension’ of future is created first by 0-Minds who project their ‘imagination’ in the external world, re-ordering each scale. Thus minds are both the alpha and omega, described accordingly by the 1st and last postulates of the i-logic Universe:

‘The i-logic Universe is a Fractal, scalar super-organism, infinite in time duration, in time cycles, in spatial extension and spatial scales, in which all parts are self-similar to the whole, made of an infinite number of complementary systems of lineal energy and cyclical information, structured into social super-organisms, through 3∑±∆ scales, which constantly create 5 Dimensional, functional åctions, lineal energy feeding, high, informative gauging, wide, reproduction, social evolution and travel through 3 of such scales in the life-death cycles of existence; all of which is expressed in a feed-back equation, from which all laws and equations of science can be deduced:


 Which is the Fractal Generator=Creator of all existences.
TŒ is based on the cyclical nature of Time and fractal structure of space evident to all systems. This Organic Structure is both Simplex but also Ternary Complex due to the 3 arrows-dimensions of time, it symmetry with the 3 organic parts of all systems, and the ternary structure of the scales of the 5th dimension that co-exist together in organic systems.

Thus the ternary Cyclical=repetitive nature of fractal space-time systems and events becomes the constrain and cause of all the laws of Science and T.Œ merely systematizes those laws by extracting them from the fundamental space, time elements of reality.

Then in each of those scales of space-time, we find that the common laws of 5D space-time Correspond with the laws of the species of each scale and its previous theories.

So all this, we resume in a formula, T.Œ=SC3 that embeds those Principles of Philosophy of Science that all Organic Time-space Systems Follow, born of the duality between the Simplex, S, principles and the ‘ternary Complexity’, C3 by repetition of those events.


The 3 pillars: 5th Dimension and its Scientific Scales; Cyclic Times and Fractal Spaces

The 3 empirical elements of all Universal systems: ∆ST


The metric of the 5th dimension, the field of research pioneered by this writer defines a Universe made of isomorphic scales of space-time where smaller beings in any scale of reality (from chips to black holes, quarks or rats) process information, stored in the cycles and form of its clocks of time, faster than larger beings (vacuum tubes, stars, electrons or elephants), but the product of both, S xT=K(∆±1) remains invariant.

Such invariance creates a stable ‘metric geometry’ that defines a new dimension of space-time, which solves all kind of fundamental questions about reality, from the unification of charges and masses (2 vortices of space-time of two different membranes, the quantum nanoscopic and galactic macroscopic ones, in which paradoxically the faster clocks of charges make its electromagnetic force more attractive), studied in this post, to the explanation of the life-death world cycle (no longer a world line as in 4D physics, since the new dimension of depth, ‘curves’ existence into a cycle, which happens as we travel through 3 ∆±1 planes of space-time, from the seminal ∆-1 faster plane of existence, to the human individual plane, as members of the slower ∆+1 rhythms of nations and civilizations our super organisms, to the conundrum of genetics.

Since smaller ‘systems’ paradoxically as fractals do hold more information in its faster cycles of time. So they code the larger plane of human existence. In the graph we illustrate those 3 cases showing its co-invariant Sxt parameters.

The  ‘fractal, scalar’ structure of space-time of which we are all parts that occupy a vital space and last a finite time, means also that all systems are ‘equal in value’, in a Universe of absolute relativity.

Indeed, if we call the product of the Spatial energy and temporal information of a system, its existential function, EXI=ST, which determines its survival force, all systems exist a similar amount of subjective time, because smaller beings think faster. So an ant-queen – an insect that lives 7 years but process information 10 times faster (reason why you don’t catch a fly) – lives actually 70 years.

Further on Absolute relativity allows species of different sizes to interact without extinguishing each other. And the result is that all ‘vital space-time beings’  are organized in ∆±1 planes of existence.

So humans are made of cells and form part of a global society, matter is made of atoms, and forms part of planets and stars that form part of galaxies and so on. How to order all those scales in a meaningful way?

We can do so by precisely by putting them together into the  ‘fifth dimension’ of space-time: the dimension of relative size in Space, Se, and relative speed of time clocks, Tƒ, which evolve in opposite directions, when we become ‘bigger’ or ‘smaller’.

And this unity of all beings, made of scalar space-time and related by the metric of the 5th dimension i what makes us all absolute relative because we all display the same ∆=SxT existential force, we live the same subjective time, as smaller faster beings think much more: the 7 years of an ant are in a mind that has 10 times faster thoughts, 70 years of experienced life.

We must thus study the ‘isomorphisms’ of all beings across scales as the essence of reality and only once this higher collective knowledge is realized, study the individual isomorphisms of beings.

New 5th dimension

In graphs, the 2 pillars of ∆ST (‘General Systems of isomorphic, scalar space time planes):

-The existence of a fractal, scalar structure in the Universe, where species of different sizes and speed of information co-exist together. And where each science studies species within a certain range of spatial size and temporal information.

-The formal metric that relates all those scales according to their different speed in its clocks of time that process information in its frequency and form, and its different size. Since both parameters together, are co-invariant, as smaller things (quarks and black holes in physical space; insects and rats in biology, chips in mechanisms) turn faster and process information faster than larger species, but the product of both is a constant that allows the interaction of several of such scales, making the complex universe possible: SP x Tƒ = ∆±4.

The Œ=Sc³ method of reasoned truths. 

T.Œ, a ‘Theory Of Everything organic’,  based in the rediscovery of cyclical time clocks, a concept, so obvious in Nature and the systems of time measure, which in the Eastern world was the basis of its religious philosophies of the Universe (Taoism and Hinduism) and in the West was natural to the Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek tradition, followed by Leibniz and his concept of relational space-time, of a Universe made of ‘fractal, vital spaces’ (the entities we see all around us), which lasted a finite time cycle (its cycle of creation, evolution and extinction).

Indeed, a historic analysis shows that ALL civilizations always thought time to be cyclical except the one who developed the western global military empire, by using first lineal iron swords and then lineal gunpowder weapons. And we shall see immediately how linearity became a necessary tool to develop ‘Germanic iron swords and gunpowder weapons’, and the close connection between lineal physics and people who culturally belong to the culture of weapons.

We are going to explain the whole world here with only those 3 time motions, its spatial symmetries and ternary co-existent planes of the 5th dimension that creates an Œ-rganism  a point-particle, a knot of cycles of timespace, of which we are all made, which lives a world cycle, made of stop and go beats of information and motion, actions of perceiving and feeding, either perceived as a ‘dynamic flows of time cycles’ , or as  a series of ‘still photographs of static space’, (as the duality of a movie, made of stills. We exist as a series of small derivatives, that measure and put together all those time cycles into simultaneous ‘slices’ of space’:

  • ∂t=S; which added together, K(v) x ∂t=S  creates the steady speed of time motions we see around us, v=S/∂t.

This is what we are, a sum of multiple time cycles, knotted into simultaneous synchronous flows of time, seen by the static mind that perceives them, as a series of still pictures of space that put together the fractal puzzle of the world.

And so with this duality of 3 time motions and its corresponding 3 spatial forms, we shall resolve, logically and mathematically, all the questions unresolved in science due to this huge simplification of cyclical times, the ultimate ‘formal motion’ of the Universe.

Since as it happened when Copernicus put the sun in the center (the conceptual advance) and Kepler and then Newton realized this simplified enormously the equations of the Universe according to the Principle of Truth called Ockham’s razor (which we shall call here ‘Simplicity’, S), the ‘Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So once we understand time cycles, the 5 main parameters of truth of science will work to explain it all ‘simple’ and not ‘malicious’.

We put them in a formula that paraphrase Einstein’s: Œ=Sc³; which of course ads the so often forgotten O-bjectivity, which is at the heart of most of the errors, disguised as science today. So we shall talk of Logic Objectivity and Experimental evidence as the two fundamental parameters of any theory of truth; which implies Minimalism (simplicity), Correspondence with previous theories and cyclical predictability:

-Logic Objectivity is essential to science, and it is today lost to absurd theories like the big-bang, the creationist, militaristic theory of cosmology, capitalism, the subjective dictatorship of bankers, mostly of biblical cultures, who think to be chosen of go(l)d and monopolize the right to print the language of social power, money in private hands and of course creationist theories of biology, nationalist theories of history that deny the unity of all human species, which should help each other to survive as a singe species, and mechanism, which requires a God to create the machine of the Universe, unlike the organic theories of this blog.

Logic Objectivity is thus the right objective information that the Πas observer point must fight to avoid the natural subjectivity of all points of view Рbecause that is the true fight of science; and such objectivity requires rational evaluation of:

– Experimental Evidence will show ALL to be a part or a whole cycle of time motion, including a lot of phenomena observed but not explained.

– Simplicity, , will show that Time cycles explain many more things than the previous Time paradigm (Lineal Time, either in the Galilean or Einsteinian formalism). It does in fact explain it ALL, as Experimental Evidence will show all to be a time cycle.

– Correspondence will show that it also explains the previous paradigm, including Galilean and Einsteinian formalism as a ‘limiting’ case of a time cycle (that is a small part of it).

-And, yes, Complexity born only of the iteration, and ternary symmetries of the  3 arrows of time and its ternary symmetries in space and the 5th dimension

Indeed, we stress in T.Œ, the formula that resumes the ‘objective experimental elements’ of the scientific method: Œ=Sc³, whereas Œ stands for the Objective, Isomorphic, Logic reason that must guide the interpretation of the information obtained by any point of view through Experimental evidence. In that regard once more a single letter, Œ, breaks into the 3 elements it compose it: O,L,E.

Any œ point of view will absorb energy and convert it into information in its mind, adapting that evidence to its subjective, selfish point of view. This is natural to the equation of any mind and so a scientist is by no means immune to that bias. It is precisely the awareness that always we tend to bias information what guard us against all kind of ‘theories’ of reality, based in scanty data, or the use of a single language of truth (mathematics included) to evaluate that data. So truth is higher when more languages are used to evaluate truth, when more logic reason is included.

The organic paradigm stresses the multiplicity of Linguistic, Logic points of view – at least the 3 x 3 + 0 10 dimensional perspectives of the 3 scales and 3 space-time elements and the o-point that puts them all together.

The 10th dimensional view: sub-systems

In that sense there is a clear more complex formalism of 5th D metric: a 10 dimensional analysis of the 3×3+0 subsystems of most organisms, from the 10 dimensional formulation of the supposedly simplest strings to the 10 Physiological systems of the Human being, in which the 10th system, the nervous system is the whole that integrates all other forms.

10 is indeed the perfect number, the tetraktys of the Pythagorean, 3 x 3 sub-systems dedicated to reproduce, information and energy in the 3 scales with the ‘black bole’ in the center of the 3 triangles, coordinating them all and connecting the system with the above ∆+1 social larger scale.

Any point of view or analysis thus becomes objective when it ads the 10 logic and multiple Language views. If we consider the total truth of a being, 1, a probability that only the being carries in itself we can establish a simple rule for the Organic method:

Max. Truth = Max. Objectivity = Max. Linguistic Logic perspectives on Max. Experimental evidence.

In this manner logic information illuminates Experimental evidence. And this is what most scientists do not respect even if they think they do. As there is always working a subjective, subconscious subliminal interpretation of data to favor the ego paradox, the point of view of the individual, nation or tribe.

Which leads to the next parameter of truth in science:

Cyclical predictability, as all laws of science are based in the cyclical nature of phenomena that do repeat in time, and so we can predict the future of the species we study, as this writer has been doing for decades in all sciences (easily proved in papers, printed books and copyrights at Library of Congress since the 90s), with the theory of time cycles, which includes among many others:

The prediction of the present crashes of the economy (2001-2008-2016 crashes of overproduction of chips and its main software e-money, easily calculated with the classic Volterra equation of ‘saturation of ecosystems’, outlined in this introduction).

-The existence, proportion and nature of dark matter (95% of the Universe), and the dominance of Black holes on the cosmos and the proper understanding of the increasingly accumulated errors of big-bang cosmic theory, and the spooky interpretations of quantum theory.

-The importance of eusocial evolution, based in common languages of information as parts become wholes, only now recognized.

-The existence of topological evolution, which resolves the horizons of species and its ‘strange’ capacity to evolve so fast, so right in so short periods (punctuated evolution, slowly being accepted today), scientifically without need of cuckoo creationism.

-The importance of epigenetics, which implies higher ‘units’ of genetic coding in ‘larger’ ternary groupings, sentences of the genetic code, not only 3 letters to code genes (as time cycles put together ‘space-steps’ into larger ternary cyclical structures, building an architectonical ‘5th dimension’ of parts that become wholes, the TRUE ARROW of future of the Universe.

-And as part of that topological process of evolution, the existence of 3 ‘axial mind races’  derived from the crossing of the lineal, visual, long Neanderthal mind of the white man, the cyclic, informative, wide, verbal Mongoloid and the reproductive, tall, emotional Black mind; and the 3 equivalent ‘human genres’, the verbal woman, the visual man and the emotional child.

A theme, which as we shall see when dealing with the anthropomorphic, ego-centered paradox of humans, especially intense, makes people anger. We, as we all know are the center of the Universe, by decree, and this is the only thing that matters, a fact defined by the equation of the mind:

O-mind(infinitesimal point of view)x ∞ observed universe of space-time cycles=self-centered mind-world:knot of time cycles

Alas, we shall also explain all the syntax and grammar of all the languages of the Universe, and the self-paradox, as we see from our knot of space-time cycles, that all the space-time cycles we see ‘COME TO US’ , the center of the Universe. never mind all other points of view or ‘monads’, are also centers of the Universe, and all of them see only a very reduced part of that Universe, being most of it that 95% of dark matter-energy, structural to the infinitesimal ego that must select information, from his selfish point of view. So alas, each nation, each race, each gender is superior or at best equal to all others.

Funny though is that in the case of human genders and races of the mind they are ‘complementary’. And that is slightly more complex and beautiful, because it obliges them to come together to be ‘better’ as a whole than as parts.

As evolution constantly creates ‘lineal’ entropic, spatial, moving elements; cyclic, temporal, informative ones and crosses them, into ‘present’, reproductive, balanced forms: | xO=Ø, the simplest of all equations of space-time ‘creation’ in the Universe.

Indeed, all is yin=Vishnu=cyclical information x Shiva=lineal energy=yang that combines to create the ∞ fractal space-time beings that configure the Universe (yes we do also explain arts and religions here, even those who are pure bigotry, because all does have a reason when it exists and also a reason why it becomes extinguished). Which bring us to the next parameter of truth:

Coherence: The Whole must be coherent with its parts, it must not require further elements and it must be coherent with the syntax of the languages of the mind it uses to explain reality, which must mirror it. And yes, we shall see how there is a Universal grammar, first understood by Chomsky et al for verbal languages, common to all mind-mirrors, with 3 elements, one for time-information other for energy-space and the third active element that combines them:

Subject (information) < verb (action) > Object (energy of subject).

Red (energetic color code) < green-yellow>blue (informative color code).

F(x): time function = (active operandi that transforms one side into the other) G(y) space function.

Length-motion (space dimension) x Height (informative, time dimension) = Width (reproductive dimension),

which defines the form of most entities of space-time so your spherical, informative time head is in the height dimension, you move energetically in the length dimension, and your bilateral reproduction of cells happens in your width dimension.

AS WE ARE ALL space-time fractals. And the Evidence=Minimalism x Correspondence x Cyclicality x Coherence, method of truth will show you that to be the case: E=Sc³, is the equation of truth, a bit more complex than the one of physicists (-:

All this said 5D strictly speaking is in most of its formal structures a 10 Dimensional theory of 3 spatial components, 3 time ages, 3 scales of size-time speed and a 0-point pegging it all together, but not to scare too much the ‘primitives’ I decided, given the idolatry to Einstein and his 4D concept specially among all those who have no idea of what he meant (the immense majority) to call it 5D.

So we call the 3 dimensions of time, 3 ages, whereas 4D-time is the present age of time. And then we stress the symmetry between the 3 dimensions of space and the 3 dimensions of time.

And we treat the 3 co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, as ‘planes’ or scales (properly scales would be the 10 sub-scales of 10 social groups between planes, such as So=1 individual, S1=10 family of 3 generations, S2=100 tribe-friend networks and so on).

But for a formal analysis of it, most studies will be analysis of systems through 3 scales and 3 ages or 3 scales and 3 spatial organs, and many other 3 x 3 combined analysis with a 0-point that fusions them all.

And since in mathematical equations each ‘variable’ is called a dimension of a ‘phase space’, most formal studies in different sciences, we can consider to be 10 dimensional.

So the 10 Dimensional concepts works much better for the full ® model, and that is how the top-complex formalism of T.Πwas originally written 24 years ago.

So one can imagine if we are still here by 2140, some Chinese congress on 10D (I doubt westerners too much caught on their egos and weapons and jargons and idols of the tribe will ever care for it), will rewrite the whole thing on the proper 10 D formalism.

In that sense 10 Dimensions means today many different formalisms that study systems along 3 space fractal parts, 3 temporal ages, 3 scales of the 5th dimension. 10 parameters to fully describe a system, which are 10 parameters in General relativity 10 parameters in string theory, 10 systems in physiology, 10 is then the number of the game…

We have so far settle down just for the study of 5+5 =10 isomorphisms.

Now this is the formal view. You tell me you want to study a human being? Fine, I give you the generator, and then the 10 physiological systems studied by scientists and then we are in business,

And in each of those systems there will be a Tƒ dominant part, with a o-point, which is the ‘soul-self’ which is from where the actions of space-time of the being depart.

So in the human case we would consider obviously the ‘self’ (never mind where it is exactly in the brain, I have my opinion – which as I haven’t had an entire roaster of researchers and specialists to consult will so far consider opinion not truth), but anyway this self is in the Tƒ-brain for sure, and it is where you decide how to switch between your 5 modular actions never stopping as s formal motion in time, just switching between ∆I (informing yourself, what you do now), ∆e (fed up going to feed you with some food not for thought), ∆æ (moving along your way to the kitchen), ∆œ, what the hell lets have some fun going with my girlfriend in the ultimate final goal of reproduction, and socializing in the path to that goal ∆û with other human beings.

So does the electron where the 3 quantum numbers, solutions to the Schrodinger wave are the 3 ‘dimensions of simple actions’ ∆æ, the principal number, ∆e, the secondary number, ∆I, the 3rd magnetic numbers, ∆o, the reproductive spin, and the external magnetic field (Zeeman effect) will make it all socialize in harmony.

Yes, I have on purpose put you the 2 extreme examples form your point of view, the human ∆o, that you consider by the ego paradox is sooo special, and the minimalist particle known o man the electron (well there is also the photon and the neutrino even smaller but they will also show the same arrows, for example light does have the arrow of motion and reproduction, ∆æ, ∆I, called c-speed, that moves and reproduces the wave, and perpendicular to it, the arrow of energy ∆e, called the magnetic field, and perpendicular to it, the arrow of information, ∆I, called the electric field and so what you call the dimensions of space-time, in your Euclidean space-time light universe are actually for the photon, its function of existence. and what about social life, does a photon have social life? (-; likely more than you if you are reading this text, LOL, sorry well, it is called color, colors are social photons, group of them H plancktons in social frequencies.

So where it is the 5th dimension? All over the place, sustaining us, warping light into particles into atoms into molecules, growing socially into wholes that become units of new wholes.

And all can be explained with the generator.

But we will not sue here, the 10 dimensional formalism, as physicists might complain.

We shall merely consider the generator a 10 dimensional equation, or 10-parameter equation and study the isomorphic laws of all systems in the following order:

o) Defining the minimal ∆-1 point of the being, which starts the process of generation, till emerging as an ∆-whole.

1-3: Spatial isomorphisms: description of the Fractal generator its symmetries of space-time.

1) Defining the Fractal Generator Equation  of this ∆-whole and its ∆ST symmetries.

2) Studying its bidimensional planes of space-time and its dual symmetries.

3) Studying the spatial ternary parts of the system that define it in present space, its symmetry with the 3 ages of time and 3 scales that co-exist together by exchanging energy and information between its asymmetric arrows upwards and downwards.

4-6: Temporal isomorphisms: integration of actions that give birth to the world cycle of existence.

4) Studying how those exchanges of energy and information happens between the relative self-centred, ∆-being and its lower and upper ∆±4 planes of existence

5) Studying its o-point and the will of its actions, which from its perspective are made to increases its energy, information and social evolution, so we talk of 5 ±∆e, i and Social actions (æ,e,i,œ,û) that conform its program of positive existence.

6) Yet the being dies due to the balance of its actions with those of the larger being in which it exists and the fight for existence in a crowded universe where each vital fractal tries to reproduce and grow using others as energy.

Thus the 6th isomorphism studies also the hierarchical structure of inner and outer world of the being and its social classes, which study how those parts, two by two relate to each other (heads with bodies, bodies with limbs, limbs with external fields of energy etc.)

So the total fusion of the being, its inner and outer networks, position within the social classes of the super organism in which it exists, and total sum of actions, brings together the worldcycle of the being. So ultimately the 6th isomorphism wraps it all up, studying its 3 ages of life as a constant travel sum of the integrated actions of existence of he being through its motions on the 5th dimension.

This is the basics of it. And it will give us all the fundamental perspectives of the system, its organic ∆D co-existence its temporal logic causality its spatial, mathematical topology and its mental o-point will.

Then depending on which system we study we will widen this 6 basic analysis with 3 related quantitative or detailed further analysis.

7-9: The 3 quantitative, social, scalar isomorphisms.

The 7th isomorphism studies quantitatively the generator and the relationships between the parts, and its ratios, the Tƒ/Sp density of information and its inverse Sp/Tƒ density of energy, the Sp=Tƒ constant of present actions, etc. Those are elements, which are essential to physics.

Then the 8th isomorphism considering those elements allow us to study varieties, creative variation of the species we must analyze.

While the 9th isomorphism study variations of social evolutions as individuals become parts of decametric wholes, So=individual becomes part of S1:families, part of S2: tribes, part of S3: villages and so on.

0=-10 isomorphism: the limits of the domain, ∆±1 points of existence.

Finally the 10th isomorphism returns to the generator and studies the ∆+1 point of existence, the whole which is made of co-existing 3 planes as wholes, each one with its ternary space-time symmetries.

We can see then that the o-point and 10th point are self-similar and the program has realized its ultimate purpose: to reproduce the information the i-logic system, the being both in space, through waves of reproductive fractals and in time and the 5th dimension through actions, which are reproductions of the mind-point and finally through the construction of a larger whole made to the image and likeness of the smaller being.




The building of dimensions, where there are the geometrical planes of 5th dimension

The fact that most laws of (Greek) geometry can be proved in bidimensional planes of information, Tiƒ, without motion means a lot of things.

First, that human minds extract the 4th dimension of motion and reduce the 3rd dimension of depth, to  see bidimensional planes which they add together to make up a 3rd dimension, and then put just a ‘bit of motion’ to ad the time dimension. In this manner the mind perceives a holographic universe.

But as the mind observes reality, and the closer it does, the higher chances of survival it has, we conclude that reality also works as a holographic ‘mess’ of planes of Se, Spatial energy and Tƒ, Temporal form (and its <≈> Combinations):

Se <≈>Tƒ

This the greeks understood at the end of his geometrical age with the concept of conics, whereas an informative cycle, Tiƒ, and a perpendicular plane Se, suffice to create all the curves <≈> – the so called conics, of the Universe.

Thus there are only 2>3 truly different plane species, cyclical tall informative time and flat planes of space, with its hyperbolic combinations.

In the present analysis of a single space-time continuum in physics (General Relativity) this concept has shown to be most fruitful in the ‘foliated’ version of Missner, which breaks the block of space-time into sheets that accumulate, one after another, allowing the use of the most general equation of physics (the hamiltonian), and its handling with computers.

Further on the whole Universe appears as a flat sheet of space, in which ‘vortices of time’ (galaxies and masses), add a tall dimension.

Thus all this, tells us something obvious to those who understand: The Universe departs from bidimensional planes of Se (space), Sp (space in motion or ‘kinetic energy-entropy’ and bidimensional planes of tall information, Tiƒ, or its moving version, Tƒ-time cycles.

The 5D bidimensionality is then reduced to this building concept:

5-Dimensional Universe = 2-Dimensions of Time-Information x  2-Dimensions of Space-Energy= 4 Dimensions, connected through the apex of time vortices to the ∆+1 upper  4 Dimensional plane and through the ‘energetic base’ of the conic to the lower 4 D ∆-1 plane.

This, we bring now so the reader do have a mental picture of the 5th dimension, which often people asked me ‘where it is’.

Those time cycles become then as ‘perpendicular vortices’, the ‘connected’ element between planes of the 5th dimension, which are called ‘Rossen bridges’ in Relativity, masses and charges and classic physics, ‘physiological networks’, in biology; flows of digital money in economic ‘societies’…

From form we do have to bring function and then see how ‘topological planes’ can be deformed without much tear to mold in each scale the form to the function. In this manner from the clear geometry of simpler planes, through the transformation of ‘spatial dimensions’ into ‘time functions’, we will be able to understand in the same manner a flux of magnetic forces and a flux of financial orders.


What is the Universe? A 5D Game of Non-Euclidean Points of view.

The mathematical unit of the complex universe is the Œ-fractal point, better defined as a Non-Euclidean knot of infinite cyclical parallels f energy and information that converge into the Œ-point.

Œ-points are both points of information, with form, fractal points, non-Euclidean points made of 3 bidimensional geometries. And they are Energetic, points with ‘momentum’, with motion, Œ-points pushed by the E-nergy or E-ntropy motions behind them.

Hence the importance of ‘momentum’ in physics, given the fact that we do NOT see a point without motion (though we can extract mathematical properties from it). So by definition we do prefer in physics, the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian canonical analysis, which uses momentums rather than ‘pure scalar’ masses (Newtonian formalism), in the description of ‘physics of motion’; which for this reason is also along bidimensional ‘foliated’ analysis (fluids, General Relativity, Hamiltonian version), and the duality of finitesimals (point-particles, undistinguishable Bose statistics) vs. Wholes, 3 ever pervading ‘realities’ of physical systems.

If we add the understanding of the two asymmetric arrows of 5D geometries (information moving upwards, energy downwards) we have the fundamental elements that we shall use to ‘explain’ properly and correct some of the gruesome errors of the physical Universe.

Thus the units of reality are dimensional points. And all Realities are constructed with them.

This is what we are. Points, which grow in size as we come closer to them, and grow even larger as we enter the region of the ego, till reaching the ultimate essence of it.

The zero point, the fractal point, the Non-Euclidean point, the first postulate of existence, the I…

The Universe is a mathematical, i-logic game of Non-Euclidean points of view that web waves of exi-stence, communicating, cyclically forming wholes that decay back into parts in the process of death, cycling in time and space.

And the understanding of the Is and its i-logic and Non-Euclidean mathematical rules of existence is the game we all play and each mind reflects with a language.

Aristotle was perhaps the man who better understood the Universe as a sum of non-Euclidean points of view, and after him Leibniz, who said that ‘we must regard each point as a Universe in itself’ and indeed, in the fractal Universe each atom is a galaxy, an island Universe of a bigger gravitational scale, and this infinity of self-similar games that are played in different scales is what we talk about, which is resumed in the widening i-logic of those i-points of view, which have internal parts, which have breath unlike the simpler non-e points of view.

The fact that all points interact with the external Universe is explained by the 5th postulate of Fractal Logic, which completes the 1st postulate.  The 5th postulate defines a point as a knot of communication of multiple flows of energy and form, which the point absorbs to obtain energy and information for its organic cycles of iteration.

Thus we introduce a new perspective in our study of a Non-Euclidean, fractal point of view: its capacity to gauge information and absorb energy, acting-reacting to the Universe. Since beyond those 3 internal regions the point feeds on an external world of relative forces, which provide the point with energy and information to map out reality and feed its body with motion. Thus, while energy and form will be different for each point according to the scale and form, all entities of the Universe will be able to absorb a relative number of ‘infinite parallels’ to create mental fractal mappings and keep on moving: light feeds particles, intergalactic gas feeds stars; plants feed animals that feed man; stars feed the black hole, and so on.

In science, mathematicians and physicists seek to describe reality as ‘made of mathematical entities’; while logicians try to explain reality as a series of causal events. But only when we use i-logic geometry we can mix both approaches, describing reality as a series of ‘mathematical points of view’, or entities that ‘gauge’ the geometry of the Universe, constantly mapping out the universe, to achieve a ‘selfish’ will, the desire of all entities to feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially.

Those points of view are thus ‘mathematical minds’ because they gauge and somehow ‘perceive’ the geometry of the Universe, acting according to that geometry as they gauge and move with an ‘automatic’ behavior, trying to absorb energy for their body, information for their gauging mind, and combining both, to reproduce ‘self-similar points’.

So we shall consider that the Universe is made of i-logic, fractal ‘points of view’, akin to the concept of souls and Atmans in western and eastern religions’, of ‘Non-Euclidean points of view’, ‘monads’ or ‘Spinoza’s geometrical entities’, in western philosophy of science and mathematics; of ‘gauging particles’ in physics, or ‘informative DNA nuclei’ in biology and perceptive heads in biology. The size and form of all those points varies but all of them are spherical knots of information with sensorial apertures to absorb and emit energy and information, from bosonic particles to sound waves or light signals.

Leibniz, the first philosopher of modern science, which considered points as the ‘fundamental particle’ of the Universe departed from the hypothesis that all what exists can be reduced to such points of view, he called Monads. Yet those monads could either share energy and information between themselves as they do on reality or become static, perfect non-communicative points.

This easier choice – non-communicative points of view – was Mr. Leibniz’s error. Since the points of the universe are in perpetual communication as parts of networks of self-similar points, sharing flows of energy and information – waves of forces. The essence of any point of any relative space-time is precisely to be in constant communication with the Universe as a ‘knot’ of Time Arrows, which shares flows of energy and information with other points, creating the network-spaces of which reality is made.

Points that communicate energy and information, that feed and gauge are real. What is the proper name for all those logic parts that exist, for all those points of space that perceive, gauge information, and act-react to it under a simple program of ‘survival’: grow and reproduce, exist, repeat yourself? We call them a Non-Euclidean point of view. And we affirm the Universe is made of such type of points of view.

Thus ‘mathematical, Non-Euclidean points of view’, whose ‘motions’ have a ‘will’ or ‘purpose’ – gauging information, feeding on energy and reproducing themselves’ – become the logic and geometric units that shape the networks of energy and information of reality, thanks to their capacity to communicate and share energy and form. Such type of points are more akin to the view of Eastern philosophers that consider the Universe made of ‘atmans’, which are knots of communication that anchor a certain entity to the world that surrounds them, which is only a part of the total Universe.

Since those mathematical points of view exist in many different fractal space-times or ‘scales of existence’ in which they gauge information with different languages and perceive different ‘worlds’ within their minds.

If you are a particle – an electron – you will see only light (energy) and darkness, and you will move to the light that feeds you, as we observe in electrons. If you are a human eye you will see all type of colors but red will be the color of energy that ‘feeds and attracts your eye (so you see bloody movies and like red meat). So there are an infinite number of types of organic points of view with different mental worlds, which gather into social networks that exist in different ‘planes of existence’ or ‘scale of reality’. Yet in all those systems the same game of ‘gauging’, ‘feeding’, ‘reproducing’ and evolving socially takes place.

Non-Euclidean Points of view have perception, they have mathematical view, they have Non-Euclidean i-logic paths or structures of causality in its built-in organic systems and as such can be described as living entities.

All beings are points which are a world in themselves, and so the point world is the unite of it all. Externally it might be always reduced to a mere point of a bigger field, in actions of collective experiences, but internally it feels itself so important.

Yes even the ant feels itself important s an ant.

And we might be seen as ants by systems of national power that control us.

Our Space thus is the bidimensional magnetic wave. Our time is the charge-electric field bidimensional wave, c-speed is the space x Time combination of both, c=1/√µ x ε0   (the peculiar positions of human equations with inversions squares etc. does not matter much here, c-speed is a 4 Dimensional space-time wave, and most properly should be treated as c2 ‘always’, as it is always positive, and it appears in that sense in the next equation whose meaning we must find now:

E= Mc2

That is, E<c2>M

A 4 Dimensional space-time of pure motions E(Spe) becomes a 4 Dimensional space-time present wave (C2) which can be curved in the largest of all perceived planes of physical space-time as a mass, a clock vortex of gravitation (Principle of equivalence of Einstein).

The constantly of light follows immediately because it is our space-time.

In terms of the action of information it follows and latter will be studied in more detail from the fact that electronic Tƒ, our minds, ‘stop motion into still space’, and to do so they must in the beat of stop and motion of the Universe stop gauge light space-time information sent by other particle and hence entangle with the other article.

How it is done, it will be analyzed latter. My hypothesis is that it happens through 2 neutrinos, which are first fixed as space (neutrino theory of light of which Jordan, Fermi, and Bohr were enthusiastic proponents).

Neutrinos thus would be the strings (its size is in fact that of the Planck string) of the minimal space perception of our Universe, rounding on the lower scale the parameters of the Physical world.

All this of course can be established with far more complex mathematical equations as we shall attempt to do in the 4th line in the future…

At this stage we just will consider the parallelism of the 3 scales, the human biological and economic/mechanical scales, with those 2 bidimensional fields of space and time, which create all systems of Fractal Space-times and its bi-Dimensional Lines, Waves, and Cycles.

Organic vs. abstract interpretations.

As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’.

So for example:

– The collapse of a wave into a particle, is exactly the same process that collapses a school of fishes when a huge predator comes, but this implies to accept that particles do gauge information and do follow a survival program, and do evolve socially. And anthropomorphic humans never will accept this. So we do have all kind of absurd Copenhagen interpretations of the particle-wave duality.

– The Compton wavelength of a particle is equivalent to the wavelength of a photon whose energy is the same as the rest-mass energy of the particle.

The standard Compton wavelength, λ, of a particle is given by


where h is the Planck constant, m is the particle’s rest mass, and c is the speed of light. So we can define the existential nature of the particle (its mass and wave-length or Tƒ<ST function) with the Compton wavelength, but this matters not to physicists. What matters to them is this:

The Compton wavelength expresses a fundamental limitation on measuring the position of a particle, taking into account quantum mechanics and special relativity.

This limitation depends on the rest mass m of the particle. To see how, note that we can measure the position of a particle by bouncing light off it – but measuring the position accurately requires light of short wavelength. Since for photons of frequency f, energy is given by


And Light with a short wavelength consists of photons of high energy. Thus playing with both similar formulae if the energy of these photons exceeds mc2, when one hits the particle whose position is being measured the collision may yield enough energy to create a new particle of the same type: l x mc. This renders moot the question of the original particle’s location: which one?.

Now what matters to E=HC2 here is that you cannot measure the particle you have shot!

What matters to Œ=SC3 is that when you give enough energy to a particle, as when a living mother feeds enough, you have an offspring of new particles, children, hence the particle REPRODUCES!, IT does follow one of the living action ∆œ of the program of the Universe.

The physicist or human doesn’t give a shit for that. The philosopher DOES.

NOW WE HAVE given you two clear examples of organicism:

– An entity, which is ORGANIC, made of connected parts, NOT a single dimensional being, and a being that is reproductive, as survives. A third fundamental example of T.Œ’s 5 actions is ‘perception of information’ How do particles perceive?

As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’. But the worlds monads (Fractal, Œ-points) make of it, are informative, ‘inflationary and complex’ and ALWAYS malicious (self-centred into the ego paradox of the perceiver).


A fast overview of the main sciences of mankind in the fractal paradigm.

Now given the extraordinary extension of the 5th dimension of fractal scales, the reader which is not a polymath genius (-; should stick to the basic concepts in the exploration of the fractal paradigm:

-In mathematical terms, the fractal, discontinuous structure of beings, made of social numbers which are network structures of social groups, or planes with a fractal dimension. This part is hardly developed, as fractal maths were the last subdiscipline to appear in science (1970s).

While the foundation of modern mathematics (Hilbert, Cantor) completely ignored the field, and without much understanding of the nature of non-euclidean fractal points, left those terms, points, lines of communication and planes, undefined. So we redefine the entire structure of western mathematical logic, with the discipline of i-logic geometry, as mathematics is indeed the most experimental of all sciences, in a world made of time-space begins, hence ruled by the logic of time algebra, which describes the symmetries and causal relationships between the 3 laments of the generator equation of fractal space-time beings, Sp x Tƒ = ST, and the geometry of non-euclidean fractal points.

  • So Euclidean mathematics is the limit of Lobachevksi’s pan geometry in a light space-time with 3 perpendicular parameters (electric, magnetic and c-speed field), which is the limit of Bachmann Absolute geometry without continuity, which is the limit of i-logic geometry without relative perception of infinite monad worlds, each one with a different geometry.


The fractal paradigm implies we are made of bidimensional informative clocks and spatial bidimensional sheets of lineal motion, combined in infinite variations of space-time beings put together into body-waves (right side a ¥-ray wave, the simplest combination of a bidimensional flat space – magnetic field, a bidimensional tall field of information, electric field, reproduced along the c-speed dimension of reproduction of information as we shall prove that all motions are waves that reproduce information along a dimension of length).

We must therefore upgrade the concepts of topology and geometry, from its Æ, present models into the next letter, non-æ= – logic geometry of the fractal Universe.  Since Euclidean geometry is the limit for continuous space of ¬æ, where instead of a single arrow of time, we do find 3 arrows of time: relative past, entropic, Sp-lineal motions, relative future cyclical informative motions and its present, ST-reproductive body-combinations, which again show an immortal Universe of dynamic balanced presents that constantly repeat the same systems, relative arrows of entropy and big-bang deaths that erase information, and relative future informative Tƒheads-particles-masses (life, quantum and cosmological scales) which process information and hence control and guide towards the future the fractal SpTƒ system.

-In physical and chemical terms, we should be aware that all departs from 2 principles, the principles of conservation of energy, angular and lineal momentum, which translates our 3 terms:

∫ Sp (lineal momentum) x Tƒ (angular momentum) = Ei (conservation of the total integral of those 2 parameters for a being, throughout its whole world cycle of existence, or closed path).

Now this equation differs from the equation of 5D metric in the integral element. Energy integrates a series of spatial quanta, repeated either in space or repeated in time-frequency. So it is really a sum of ∆-coinvariant elements: E= ∑∆.

For that reason we shall use the terms ∑ for energy, which is far more meaningful. And it is much more explanatory of its real meaning.

And so for each relative scale of physical systems, all starts by describing topologically the system and its 3 geometrical parts, and algebraically by translating into an E= Sp quanta x Tƒ-clock its equations.And then consider the most fascinating part of the formalism of mathematical physics; the social growth of those systems, its emergence into larger systems, its dissolution into smaller parts, and how the energy and information of the system is transferred and shared between the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales. Let us elaborate this, show in the left side of the graph.

Because the total energy and information of each scale of the Universe is conserved, we can define with simple mathematical formulae, the relative time clocks, quanta of space of each of the 3 main physical scales (left graph), with a ‘Generator equation’ of all space-time systems of the Universe, which unifies those scales: Ei=Sp x Tƒ, which in detail writes as:

∆-1: quantum scale: Ei=H (constant bidimensional space-quanta of angular momentum) x ƒ (frequency time clocks)

∆: Thermodynamic scale: Ei = nK (constant bidimensional space quanta of entropy) x T (temperature clocks)

∆+1: Gravitational scale Ei = m (bidimensional space quanta of mass) x v²/2 (c²) (time clock)

This simple equations, since the Universe is simple and not malicious, show a fundamental fact of time clocks in Nature, which makes them different from the human, artificial mechanical time clock: to vary along the different scales of the 5th dimension, increasing its speed, on the gradient of frequency, temperature and speed, as the systems expand in space (so an expansion in space cools down the temperature clock of the thermodynamic scale, and vice versa,a small mammal is hotter than a larger reptile).

Yet on the limits of those scales, the simple lineal equations of 5D metric break, and systems reach a discontinuity,  So in the gravitational scale systems cannot go faster than c-speed. In the thermodynamic scale, cannot extend lower than 0 temperature of the pure vacuum. And the frequency of waves loose all its information when they relax beyond a unit of frequency. On those barriers, as the time clocks come to zero, they space quanta absorbs the energy and information of the system. So mass grows, close to c-speed and times come to zero (Lorentz Transformations). Spatial entropy stops its motion at 0 temperature, and a thermodynamic system dies. In the case of black holes, it does NOT mean they are time machines. It only means the temperature clocks of our thermodynamic world cool down and the energy of our systems become mass: M=k/T.

  • And so because there are 3 arrows of time Aristotle and Physicists’, single time arrow logic is the limit of Taoist, hegelian dualist logic with 2 arrows, yin-information and yang-energy, which become synthesised in a reproductive energy x Information present wave-body. Thus dualist philosophy is the limit of ternary logic, the one we develop for the fractal Universe with past-spatial expansive motions, future-informative, cyclical, clock-like motions and present-repetitive motions. Hence we have to redefine Cosmology.
  • On the other hand, as we showed in the example of the big-bang Aristotle/Ptolemaic physics is the limit with the Earth as a relative centre of galilean relativity, which is the limit at low speeds of Special Relativity, which is the limit on flat space of General Relativity, 4D relativity, which is the limit on a single plane of space-time of 5D fractal space-time; where we define a 5th dimension of space-time of relative scales of size and time clocks, whose product Sp x Tƒ =ST is co-invariant, balanced stable. So smaller systems move faster than larger, systems, carrying more information in its time cycles; genes code the information of larger bodies, quantum particles of larger atoms, black holes of larger galaxies:5d 4scales

Astrœ-physics. Cyclical time and fractal space: multiple big-bang structure.

Let us indeed consider the case of the big-bang, and how it will be in a fractal Universe.

For example, in the case of the big bang; the theory based in the concept of an expansive space, becomes merely one of the 3 possible solutions to Einstein’s field equations, in a single, ‘flat’ plane of space-time; hence a limit, which must be accepted only on that region and scale of the Universe in which space truly expands, which happens to be the interstellar space between galaxies.

But within galaxies the non-lineal, cyclical, inverse arrow of temporal information, that is the accelerated clocks of the black holes, implode space into mass; hence balancing the expansive motion of interstellar space, defining an dynamic Universe in which each scale of the fractal is in balance between its ‘expansive, entropic arrow of space and kinetic energy or lineal momentum’; Sp, and its ‘implosive, informative arrow of Cyclical Time clocks, Tƒ’. 

We can therefore write a first ‘Generator Equation’ of the fractal Universe, Spe <=>Tƒ(m),  which generalises the 2 arrows of physical systems, and soon we shall see can be generalised to all systems of the Univese, made of heads/particles that process temporal information and body/wave that carry lineal energy:  Γ.  Sp <=>Tƒ

The simplicity of this equation, which can be obviously expressed with all the due details of complex General Relativity and quantum physics, shows however a fundamental tenant of the scientific method: we must always hold a higher truth, experimental evidence and then the logic postulates of the Scientific method, some of which are shown in the graph: Experimental evidence, logic cause, Ockham’s razor (a simple economic truth that explains more things and requires less elements is more truth) and no falsification. Only when there is evidence of a fact and a model is logically sound, we can go further into its mathematical simple equations ‘first’, and then further into the ‘detailed’ more complex equations of the system.

In next graph we see some E/c<=>Mc processes of spatial expansion and big-bang destruction of mass, all of which have an inverse temporal, informative, process of much slower creation of temporal information and mass that balances them, in different scales of physical systems, from the beta decay that explodes atoms into electrons and protons (with an inverse slow collapse of electrons into atoms) to the quasar big-bang of galaxies (with an slow process of creation of mass-information from gaseous space).

If we consider the space-time an absolute continuum in a single scale, this more accurate picture of what we perceive is not possible, hence we come to the conclusion of present cosmology – that the Universe will expand and die. If we consider that this expansion is compensated by galaxies, which follow Einstein’s dictum: ‘Time curves space into mass’, Mr. Hogg’s conundrum – how to correct the big-bang is solved.

And so we learn another fundamental truth of Philosophy of Science, which today is often overlooked: we must never deny experimental evidence, even if at first sight it contradicts an established theory.

 For that reason we must accept the fractal informative structure of reality, where the big bang is merely the death-rebirth cycle of a quasar-like galaxy or local Universe, a scale of size above galaxies.

Improving the explanations of physics.

So 2 points you must bear in mind, if you are a philosopher of science, polymath or professional scientist of any discipline including physics (then you must have patience and humility to expand your horizons):

We are expanding the value of all sciences, which are equalled in intellectual weight, as descriptions of species of a certain plane (∆0: medicine, ∆-1: biology, ∆+1: History, ∆+2: geology and so on).

So physics will NOT hold a superior value to History, for example (the study of the Human super organism both in time, through its life ages, and in space, as a series of superoganisms made of citizens cells, economic≈energetic and reproductive networks and political≈informative ones). As the same laws will apply to the description of a crystal than a society. To that aim, your difficulty will not be intellectual but ethical, of ego, as you love to feel special.  So the greatest ‘concept’ GST proves is the pantheist ‘taoist’ philosophy of science of a Universe in which we are ultimately space-time holographies.

And we are making the right interpretations of phenomena of many sciences, till now not properly described, because we are straighten the underlying concepts, not the mathematical equations so much as the logic explanations, which is what humans, verbal logic minds, better understand, and the errors of using different jargons for each science, undermine, specially in physics, which feels happy enough just with a mathematical equation