5Ð♥³ Relational Time§pace
“Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality. Hermann Minkowski
‘ðao (the Γenerator) gives birth to yinform and (yang), motion. Both merge into Energy (Qi), the source of all creation.’
‘Every yang has a drop of yin, every yin has a drop of yang.’
ðao ðœ. On Γ: the Generator of timespace organisms or Function of existence: 1D form + 2D motion = 3D: energy
‘Shiva≈motion+Visnu≈information combine to create the ∞ beings≈hairs of Brahma.”
Eastern philosophies, on the 3 simplex Ðimotions of ðime§pace and its ∞ ∆±¡ scales
SUMMARY
Introduction: Relational Spacetime. Dimensions, motions and actions.
S=T Ðimotions.
I. First Ðimotion: Perception
II. Second Ðimotion: Locomotion
III. Third Ðimotion: Reproduction.
IV. Fourth Ðimotion: Entropy
V. Fifth Ðimotion: Social Evolution
Abstract. The study of the five dimotions of spacetime in broad conceptual terms, which will latter be specified for a dimensional analysis in space, a motion analysis in time, an action analysis in scales and a logic analysis in the mathematical and verbal, logic languages of ¬Æ will suffice to have enough elements to describe in detail how super organisms of spacetime develops word cycles of existence as they travel through the scales of the fifth dimension.
The simplest description of a being thus happens when we consider its 5=3±∆ dimensions in space, motions in time and actions in spacetime, which define the existence of the being. Hence our title, 5Ð³; observed in the next graph for the human being:
What of those 3 elements, dimensions, motions or actions matter most? Obviously actions, as they combine ALL the elements of reality, dimension, motion and scale. So we can say as Planck realized a century ago that the unit of reality is an action, but unlike Physicists who basically study only an action (the first, locomotion) we shall consider a more complex pentagonal Universe of 5 different active dimotions.
When we order those ‘dimotions’ in space we get a superorganism,when we order them in time we obtain a worldcycle of existence, when we order them in scales, we obtain the 5 actions of all systems that absorb energy from its lower ∆2 scale (humans absorb amino acids), information from its ∆3 scale (humans absorb light), motion from its ∆3 scale (humans absorb gravitation) or simplex actions, while developing two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution from its higher, ∆1 seminal scale, ∆o scale and ∆+1 social scale.
Actions are thus the FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE of the limits of perception of any ∆ø and relate directly ‘perception’ and ‘stientific’ knowledge to the relative position of the mind that perceives. They are also the essential element to fully grasp WHY we perceive only a limit number of scales of reality with us at the center: namely because we ‘HAVE THOSE ∆±¡ practical limits in our actions’ – NOT because there are NO more scales above or below.
It is also important to realize that actions are either predatory (those involving smaller beings), equalitarian (reproduction with an ∆ø equal form) or submissive to the ∆+1 social world. We are, as Shakespeare put it, buffoons citizens or kings depending of our perspective.
So in this post we shall introduce briefly the model from the home page and then talk a bit of each of the 5 D³imotions (dimension, motions and action) of reality, which in the future will be the main method of study of beings, to understand its structure in space (dimensions of the superorganism) its worldcycle in time (ordered as sequential motions by the symmetry S=T) and combined use for the program of survival – the program of its 5 actions.
Introduction
A Universe of Relational Spacetime beings.
In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, with respect to which particles move. Space and time are a stage. Like actors on that stage, particles move, exert forces onto each other and generally act out the drama of dynamics, while the stage itself does not change. This is sketched in the illustration. There, we see objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, but there is also a fixed background structure, space, which is just as real, pictured here as a lattice of intersecting lines. Newton’s view of the universe is manifestly background dependent – whether or not a particle is moving or at rest is determined in relation to Newton’s absolute space and time – the plenum/body of God, which of course must be immortal and last for ever, graphed ‘obviously’ to make it easier for the chosen to understand.
A relational world without spatial background
But even in Newton’s day, there were philosophers like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz who took a different stance. In modern parlance, theirs is a relationist point of view. For a relationist, there is no background of absolute space and time. The fundamental properties of the elementary entities consist entirely in relationships between those elementary entities. Time is nothing but changes in these relationships, and consists of nothing but the ordering of these changes. In the relationist version of the above illustration, only the objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, are real. The lattice has no independent existence.
Even without the lattice, it does make sense to talk about the distance between two given objects. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed spacetime background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity. Physicists intent on describing our universe cannot just assume a given geometry. Instead, geometry is something that needs to be determined by solving certain equations that include all the effects of matter and energy.
But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with timemotions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe.
But space and time do exist.
It is then necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical cartesian artefact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar (a. ∆§) Space, and cyclical discontinuous time (ab.ð, Ð) who ‘lives’… in worldcycles (no longer worldlines) of exist¡ence (as species who follow the common laws of all stiences of space and time).
This idea is so simple, so beautiful, that if you grasp it and agree, I invite you to tell to all others who wonder to wander this web, now that I have completed a fairly understandable version, a decade after Mr. Wheeler’s death, a century after Mr. Einstein’s previous paradigm, a millennium after the invention of the simplex mechanical clock… WHICH DEFORMED our vision of the infinite clocks of the universe of spacetime.
Cyclical time (ab.ð) and its reduction to lineal mechanical timeclocks.
How does a Universe of infinite time clocks of different size and speed relates to the present Universe in which all time clocks are equalized to the mechanical, clocks of metalinformation, which were invented in the Middle Ages in Italy, and became the ONLY CLOCKTIME OF THE UNIVERSE, once elongated into a lineal ‘secondminutehourdayyear’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks).
Let us then start by describing the biggest blunder mankind has committed in the realm of knowledge: to simplify the nature of cycles of timespace into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs.
Physicists uncoiled timefrequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation…
Humanity is still in that primitive concept of a single time.
Einstein just added to that XVI c. equation, V=s/T, (instead of using V= wave length x Frequency), which ELIMINATES the information on the frequency and shape of the steps of the motion.
What physicists mostly do then is the study of ‘open locomotions’, translations in space, through ‘lineal inertia, or scattered, entropic paths’, of objects that move; AND WHAT they care about TO QUANTIFY in terms of ‘RODS OF MEASURE’ that speed of translation in open space, is of course part of time=motion=change studies but far less important than the qualities of ‘closed time paths of frequency and form, of information’ we shall study here.
In the graph, left side, ‘ðime’ clocks that measure the rhythms of reproduction=repetition and change=evolution of the Universe are always cyclical ‘r=evolutions’.
So while humans obviously are aware of the existence of cyclical patterns of nature, because they have abandoned the proper concept of cyclical ðime changes, and its second dimension of form, of information, they cannot fully grasp the fundamental principles of the Universe: its cycles of ðime§pace, its scales of ðime speeds as §pace size (ab. ∆±i), and the ‘mindmirrors and languages’ of information that allow systems to measure them, and interact with other beings in ðime§pace.
The concept of cyclical ðimes is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all ðime clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical ðimes. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.
Moreover science would not exist if ðimes were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in ðime of patterns of behavior and causality.
All these truths unfortunately are hidden in the ðime equations of modern physics, so good for calculus so bad for interpretation, which need to be translated into cyclical ðime, measured by frequency (T=1/ƒ) and streamlined with a new jargon appropriate for a dual Universe, as opposed to the simplex jargon of classic absolute ðime§pace physics, that lingers in all sciences and drags its understanding.
In the left physical cycles, planetary orbits, which we humans use to measure ðime in all our ‘clocks’, which are also cyclical. People are hardly aware of this fact, since they tend not to use the ‘parameter’ of cyclical ðime, which is ‘frequency’, but its inverse, lineal duration: ƒ=1/t.
The formulae are simplified in this manner. Since ‘frequency ðime’ is discontinuous and so difficult to ‘integrate’. So physicists prefer to uncoil, frequencies into Lineal Time. For example the ‘revolutions per minute of a car wheel’, multiplied by its perimeter give us the ‘distance’: λ x v = S. And besides in this manner we achieve more information, as we get the duration and form of information of each cycle (λ) and its frequency, v.
But if you just want to know the total length of along ðime period, you use Lineal Time durations and so you don’t need to sum all those cycles to get the lineal speed: V=s/t.
In the left graph, we can see that all physical systems, and all its ðime cycles return to its origin, creating a circle, but physicists uncoiled them and put all those revolutions one after another creating the concept of Lineal ðime – an artifact of measure, and further on equalized all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species with a single mechanical ‘ðime clock’ elongated into an infinite duration.
And we shall return to it, when using cyclical time to define and upgrade physical equations, with new insights on its whys, thanks to the ‘inverse arrow of time’ cyclical frequency, ð(ƒ)=1/Tduration.
The 5 Dimotions of timespace as actions of existence.
The ilogic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.
That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…
The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.
So they said the Universe is dying and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPYscattering motionsdeath aka weapons.
Let us now blow up your ‘physicist’s’ mind introducing once we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discover their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein.
The Galilean paradoxes: Continuity or discontinuity, motion or form, flat or curved Universe; Both.
In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian spacetime plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal spacemotions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (timespace relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):
The discontinuity of space and time is the key to unify the laws of sciences that describe different species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time. In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance.
When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:
Any piece of time/space seems continuous, but when we analyze it in detail, it becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths. The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.
There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.
The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws.
It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:  The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).  And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being.
Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second. The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy. We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms. And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:
And we call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’).
Definition of a Dimension as motion and distances. The Paradox of Galileo.
The first truism of scalar spacetime theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.
Thus the universe of spacetime in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion’—motions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clocklike motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.
And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute spacetime to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.
The duality of motiondistance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:
In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.
Moreover, what appears as a single spacetime continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single spacetime continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple åctions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.
The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’
The answer given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together:
All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…
The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of nonEuclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal spacetime, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.
Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of NonAristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same spacetime than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.
So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’
Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.
In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ spacedistances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their timeclocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:
– The vacuum of our scale of spacetime is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed spacedistance or as electromagnetic motion at cspeed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘—motions’ space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).
– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.
In the graph, we observe the astounding beauty of the paradoxes of Galileo, as they can be seen in space, time or relative scales, defining THE ESSENTIAL DUALITIES OF FREEDOM AND ORDER. So topology becomes metaphysics.
THE UNIVERSE REINFORCES THE PROGRAM OF THE 5 ARROWS OF TIME with SENSATIONS the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (ARROW of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).
But are humans the only species that move, perceive, kill to feed on energy, reproduce and evolve socially? Since if at least they were unique as they pretend in those sensations, they could claim to be ‘special’. Fact though is they are NOT. Those 5 ‘dimotions’ of timespace (a better word composed of dimensional motion, to define each of the 5 arrows of time), exist in all systems of Nature, as we can observe them in life. They in fact define the 5 arrows of life in biological terms, as life is defined as a system of 5 Dimotions able to process information, feed on energy, move, reproduce and evolve socially.
Yet they ARE also the 5 Dimotions of quantum particles, both quarks and electrons, ‘expressed’ by the 4 quantum numbers that code each one, a dimotion of spacetime as the attached graph shows:
So all systems of the Universe ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles.
So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic code but only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.
DEATH is the needed error of the Universe NOT desired by the program.
For that reason it lasts only a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time IS for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom/individual’ of its lower, ∆¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).
So you die in a second, your relative timeclock quanta the time of 1 thought=glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your bodyheart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is lifelasting…
Same with the conundrum of antiparticles (entropy=death arrow of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around. Death is the shortest possible arrow.
This is LEIBNIZ: ‘THE UNIVERSE is the most perfect of all worlds possible’.
Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.
ONLY man obsessed since physicists took over as high priests of time with its shallow ‘brief history’ of those ‘deep arrows; made of the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion the meaning of its existence. Because he has shown himself unable to love even his own species and emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms…
Indeed man has shown himself unable to love even his own species and emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms… So one thing is certain: we, humans are in the path of extinction, because we are denying the organic complexity of the Universe.
Let us then do a fast review of those 5 Dimotions we shall study with increasing detail as they entangle to create reality, till they become SIMULTANEOUS SUPERORGANISMS TRACING SEQUENTIAL WORLDCYCLES.
How to study the Universe of 5 Ðimotions of time and space is simple:
When the Universe orders those dimotions in time sequences you get a world cycle, when it orders those dimotions in simultaneous space you obtain a superorganism; and for the reason the first sentence of this blog, is written as a line that describes precisely that duality:
IN THE GRAPH, we see the five dimensions of reality, 3 of present organic ensembles of beings, two in scales of lower smaller parts and larger wholes. They are symmetric to the 3±1 ages of a world cycle between its 5D generation as a seed that evolves socially into a whole and its entropic death:
 ” 5Ð³ We study the 5 dimotions in a general view of each of them
 ” §pace≈ We consider them in ceteris paribus analysis as spatial dimensions.
 ” ðIMES=We observe them as temporal motions
 ” ∆±¡: we consider how dimotions always happen as communcative flows between entities of different planes. I.e. a T.œ absorbs entropy from the lowest ∆4 plane, information from ∆3 light spacetime, energy from ∆2, chemical atoms, reproduce in ∆1 seminal seeds, love an ∆º being and evolve socially in an ∆+1 world.
 ” §upœrganisms: We thus consider now the most complex simultaneous system created in simultaneous space – the super organism.
 “actº: which will act those five dimotions, as its vital actions of existence, percieving first to move towards a field of energy in which to feed, using the extraenergy to reproduce, and with similar clones evolve together. So there is a sequence in time of dimotions…
 “LIVE, whose constant repetition form the patterns of life. which can be…
 “traveling: defined as a ‘travel through planes of the fifth dimension, in which those dimotions take place… ruled by:
 “¬Æ: formal laws of Ilogic geometry (points that grow when we come closer, with inner planes; lines that are waves of exchange of energy and information, planes that are topological netorks of super organisms, laws of equality and perpendicularity that define the behavior of beings) and nonAristotelian logic (pentadimensional paths of future, back and forth relative motions in time, as entropy can be consdiered the erasing of information towards a simpler past).
 “ωorldcyclesºf. So finally the wholeness of the being can be described by its world cycle, which embodies all the information of the being between birth and extinction as a travel through 3 planes of the fifth dimension each one studied by a stience:
 “∃xi≈st¡ences: Since existence is indeed the same for all beings of all planes of the universe, and all its ∆±¡ superorganisms studied by families according to size by each stience of reality.
S=T
Yet both time=motion and space=form are ultimately mirror images of each other:
The 3 paradoxes of Galileo. Motion vs. Form, still vs. moving, flat vs. curved
‘The earth moves and doesn’t move’. Galileo: relativity and duality of space and time dimensions.
‘A Ðimotion can be perceived as a distance=dimension of space or a motion=change in time or both together’ l§
Einstein studied space as the simultaneous measure of different regions of the temporal Universe. His explanations though were a bit complex, dragging onto the tradition of lineal time and continuous space. It is all simpler. Space is a ‘mental’ perception in simultaneity of different regions of moving time cycles, which the mind simplifies, by extracting information in many ways (motion, scales, third dimension, etc.)
Physics has really been concerned since Galileo realized the earth moved but we do not perceive motion, with the paradox of RELATIVITY of motion vs. stillness. But the duality was not understood, neither the contribution of the mind to the ‘maya of sensorial stillness’ that gives us the ‘perception of space’.
Because all things move, and stillness is a maya of the senses, Galileo was right when he realized the Earth moved. But the important question science has missed ever since, and Einstein would latter explain in relativity is why we see the Earth still if it is moving. Again, we shall fully solve the conundrum when we define the equation of the mind. But as this is the icing on the cake of the cyclical universe, we shall bring it now here.
The duality of motiondistance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.
The next graph illustrates the 3 main dualities or paradoxes of endophysics (Physics in which the observer’s mind is also accounted for): motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single §pace vs. fractal scales of spar, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:
In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles. THEY SEEM TO BE FLAT but in detail they are curved. And they seem to be still but they move. So those are the 3 main paradoxes of perception: MOTION VS. FORM, FLAT OPEN, VS. CURVED, ORDERED, and CONTINUOUS VS. DISCONTINOUS.
Moreover, what appears as a single ðime§pace continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.
THUS Galilean relativity though was illunderstood, as the true question about timechange was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of smaller selfsimilar systems. Those are pending questions solved with a simple statement, which shall double our dimensions of reality:
“Since we cannot distinguish motion in time and form in space, all systems are spacetime systems with at least 2 dimensions, as to each motion in time corresponds a form in space: S=T”
So how physicists called the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages/motions of time? They have a conceptual mess made around them. Of course they study them but do not name it clearly as 3 different time dimensions.
Physicists on the entropic arrow. Partial theories of it all.
So on one side they use the entropic dimensions as the single arrow of time of the Universe, studied in entropic systems, gases and dark entropy expanding between galaxies (but here they call it mistakingly dark energy). Then most extend this entropic arrow as the only one, disregarding crystal, informative and liquid, iterative waves of matter, which make the 3 arrows of time. And in cosmology disregarding the vortex of massinformation, in galaxies that compress the Universe balanced the bigbang. So they by lack of clear concepts about time arrows, sponsor a bigbang only theory of an expansive dying Universe, eliminating on their equations the inconvenient truth of implosive timelike accelerated clocks of masses and galactic vortices.
Physicists on the present arrow: relativity and energy conservation.
Then they also study the present, simultaneous, iterative spacetime, with different tools, but conceptually messed. On one side they realise the combination of relative entropic motions and future mass particles, is conserved in the Universe, either as momentum, or as its integral in a closed repetitive cycle of conservative energy. But they do NOT CALL ENERGY the present arrow of time, they just say it is ‘conserved’, and do not know what it is.
Also they study this kind of conserved time with a formula, v=s/t, t=∂s/∂v. Whereas they measure infinitesimal moments in the process of motion, taking ‘present pictures’ of simultaneous space to refine its measure of speed (Einstein and Galilean relativity) So this measure of present stills of spacetime with derivatives, is another analysis of present space, performed by Galileo and Einstein (special relativity). And as it requires NOT a change of state in its form, it is truly always indicated for studying a single ‘present’ state. So relativity science deals mainly with the single non chaining ðime§pace continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of small quanta of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of ðime.
Physicists on the future arrow: vortices of accelerated time in different scales: masses and charges.
Finally Einstein realized that time curves space into accelerated masses (general relativity, principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration). So he defined a future, accelerated vortex of timeinformation, a mass, which we extend to charges in the smallish quantum scale, and to thermodynamic eddies inout scale (graph) which are therefore the arrow of future information nature. Yet they do NOT either recognise charges and masses as fractal clocks of accelerated future time, as we do. So they cannot unify them (the saint grail of physics is an equation that unifies charges and masses and we shall easily provide merely by adapting the obscure jargon of electromagnetism to the simpler vortexlike jargon of gravitation: Newton>Poisson>Einstein).
So while physicists have in front of them the 3 dimensions of time, parallel to the 3 forms of space, they have a conceptual mess, due to the use of a single time clock and a single arrow of time, entropy, which makes them NOT to recognise the arrow of accelerated time in masses and charges, and the relationship between steady timecycles and energy conservative cycles.
They also deny the capacity of those time vortices, particles, to process and gauge information, even if they act as ‘mathematical minds’, controlling the organic territory, they perceive. And so they miss the logic explanation of the paradox of Glalileo: particles as heads do, perceive information and gauge it in relative stillness. So as in a film, the process is an stopparticlegauge information gowave duality, which explains the paradoxes of relativity (cconstancy of speed, emitted in entangled stillness) and quantum physics (perception always of the particle stopped by the perceiver, as systems move in waves and gauge information as stopped particles).
IN THAT REGARD, PHYSICISTS miss the fundamental conceptual truth behind Galilean relativity: the Galilean paradox and its cause – the fact that minds map reality with languages, that are smallish, fixed forms and so when we perceive we reduce the 3+3 dimensions of space and time to 3 dimensions of space, to have a still image, as your eyes give it to you – with hardly any motion, to fit it all in the brain.
Thus because that description is the simplified reduced subjective vision of the human mind, which ‘stops motion’ to fit reality in its smallish brain we must conclude that the ‘real objective Universe’ is made NOT of spatial forms (a mind mirage) but of motions, not of a single continuum but many scales and clocks of time that enclose and break space into internal regions and outer worlds. So reality is about:
Dimensional ðime Motions not distances; Scalar Spaces, broken and discontinuous (ab.§) not single §pace continuum; and cyclical in form ‘ðime§paces’, not lineal (as we have proved previously).
THE S≈T DIMENSIONS OF THE UNIVERSE.
Science started when Galileo realized that the earth moves objectively, externally but the mind sees still. So we cannot distinguish motion from form (Poincare) and as such, every dimension of form=space can also be seen as a dimension of time=motion. This means we shall see timemotions and spaceforms together, giving origin to the first simpler topological dimensions:
In the graph the 3 dimensions of space and time. As we can see they correspond to the only 3 topologies of reality, and as such they combine in form and function to create in a single plane of spacetime, all the systems we observe: reality we see around is ternary made of 3 functional/formal spacetime organs/networks that form super organisms:
In graph, different orders of the 5Dimensions of reality give birth to different entities, super organisms in a single present scale of timespace, ensembles of 3 basic forms, 1D particleheads/3D wavebodies and 2D lineal limbs/fields; but only when we add the lower dimension of ∑∆1>∆º emerging seeds of information and its entropic dissolutions ∆º<∆1, the full meaning of the game of exi=st¡ences, existences as spacetime organisms studied by different stiences reach its full meaning.
Further on the 3 first dimensions are equivalent to the conservation processes of angular momentum – the first parameter perceived in the point, its motion, second parameter and reproductive strength, third parameter such as if we give an Active magnitude value as the scalar 1D and a vectorial momentum 2D number for the second dimension, we get equations of reproduction for the third dimension.
∑ LINEAL MOMENTUM ≈ LIMBS/POTENTIALS + ∑ANGULAR MOMENTUM: PARTICLES/HEADS = VITAL ENERGY
A dimensional definition of the Universe
So we talk also of 5D² systems of spacetime meaning we divide and combine in ternary, s, s=t, t, groupings those 5D²
It follows that the sum of the tree, s + s=t + t gives us a full cycle, with the incissum that s=t = s+t, as it has coupled both:
The Universe is a supœrganism that re•produces information. And it does so towards a final aim, the reproduction of new super organisms, •5D² systems, of topobiological nature, with topologic, spatial, organic, scalar and logic, temporal properties.
As such the talking of it can be as detailed as a super organism is, which increases in complexity as it ‘covers up and down’ new dimensions of entropy and information brought together into a new ∆±i super organic structure:
In the graph, the three arrows of time of a world cycle are intimately connected to the three scales ∆±1 in which the supœrganism realises its existence, up and down the scales of the fifth dimension, from seminal birth into social existence and final extinction.
In the graph the ten dimensional organism, can easily be divided in ternary grouping according to topology or scale.
The most amazing thing about the dual fifth dimension of spacetime that forms all the organisms of reality is that humans do NOT logically perceive it, despite being all around us, all being part of a partial perception of the •5D³ being, in 4D², 3D, 2 or • dimensions of existeence.
As such we humans have a hard time perceiving a full •5D³ being, let alone a simple 4D subject ordering around 3D objects, following the instructions of its holographic 2D mental sheets of information, as its moves in seemingly random lineal pointlike cycles of exist¡enœ.
The whole beings in his whole action with his hole information only exists within itself.
How much information of the being we absorb to its stientific description is obviously relative to the mind that perceives it. At least a 5D³ being will need a thorough investigation of it at the three scales ∆º±1 above and below its 0mind, pov; and through its three topologies of ðime$pace; as it performs its ∆±i ages of exist¡ence.
Existence rquires travels through the scales of the fifth dimension from that seminal to the emergent scales, in an ∆+1 social world back and forth through the eons of zerosum beings.
As such a supœrganism is always defined from the human point of view of kaleidoscopic perception as a world cycle travelling through a given ∆±i symmetry we ‘perceive’ selfcentred in ‘certain singularityparticles’ of certain stiences.
A super organism will be within the ‘limits’ of ∆±3 scales selfcentred into the ∆º being (the seminalworld, ∆±1 scales; the energetic, ∆±2 scales, and the informative ∆±3 scales), a knot of NonÆ flows of energy, information and, entropy, which make the ‘transference of’ motion and form’ between scales, as the being ‘lives’, grows, multiplies and orders a territory.
So each being is a knotflow focused at ∆º and moving through an St±i ternary scale of stiences.
It is then this ∆º systems what we can study through different stiences and species, as the fundamental particle of the Universe, which will always follow the same ex i actions, trying to reproduce≈survive its complex ‘information’ as a knot of timespace cycles.
Dimensions are motions perceived as stillness.
The Paradox of Galileo, the key logic concept to understand the meaning of dimensions, astoundingly ignored by science for 400 years: ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’, which can be enlarged to this question: ‘why we see everything still, if all what we study in a quantum scale has motion?’ IS the key to unveil the dimensions of the Universe.
The answer given by quantum physics that we shall expand further to all scales is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘particle’ and a ‘wave’’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either, but not both, dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state.
Thus, we apply this duality to the definition dimensions: dimensions are both, an extension of fixed space, perceived as motion or a motion ‘perceived as fixed space’. For example, the ultimate space of the Universe, vacuum, is teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ spacedistances (quantum vs. relativistic view); Galaxies separate from each other at huge speeds but we see their ‘motion’ as an expansion of space…Thus:
‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance’.
Hence dimensions can be generated by motions of particles and reproductions of waves. In the lower scale of string theory we can describe those dimensions as the reproduction of strings. But what matters to us is the vacuum of our scale of spacetime; which can be seen as electromagnetic motion at cspeed, since it is filled of light and background radiation, or as vacuum space.
This duality of motiondistance is similar to the way we perceive a car moving also as a fixed line of distance in a night picture, or the duality of stop and go of a film camera, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.
It explains the generation of dimensions:
A point with motion creates a line dimension; a line in motion creates a bidimensional plane of information; a plane in motion creates a massvolume and a volume in motion creates a lifecycle or worldcone – the concept used in Relativity to define the 4^{th} dimension of time.
The reader might notice that those motions become perceived by human senses as a duality of motionstillness, so the 1^{st} dimension is seen as speed, the second, a plane or sheet of information as the page you are reading as ‘still form’ or information the 3^{rd}, a volume or mass becomes again a stillness, and the 4^{th} a world line, which is substituted by a time cycle, as motion again. Thus again the past, the 4^{th} dimension becomes ‘still’ and the future, the 5^{th} dimension, an uncertain motion.
Indeed, theoretically, prior to Absolute Relativity there were in physics only 3 dimensions of space and one of time.
But under the duality of the Paradox of Galileo, in reality those 3 dimensions of space are also motions. And indeed, it is obvious at quantum scale that ‘space’ is really a bubbling world of electromagnetic energies and particles condensed from those energies.
This also applies to our scale. So if we consider the motion of a gas, volume is proportional to that motion/temperature: PxV=knT. But volume is space; so space grows as motion grows. And it applies to the aforementioned cosmic scale of galaxies moving/creating distances.
Moreover we observe that each ‘bigger dimension’ includes the previous ones. So the line includes the point; the plane, the line; the volume the plane and the worldcone the plane.
Can we extend this growing game of dimensions in motion that create a new dimension? Yes, we can, when we do a proper analysis of what the 4^{th} dimension of time in General Relativity really means – something which as most definitions of physics is far better understood in mathematical terms than in logic, conceptual ones. Indeed, physicists, unaware of the paradox of Galileo still draw higher dimensions as weird spatial drawings, when beyond the 3^{rd} dimension our ‘senses’ spatialize, by creating the stillness of lightspace, all other dimensions are perceived as motions in time. Hence there are not ‘weird’ impossible drawings of dimensions beyond the 3^{rd} one of ‘volume’, for reasons that go beyond this introductory lesson on Absolute Relativity.
Physicists spatialize time, in terms of its ‘present’ dimension.
Few physicists understand that time has also 3 dimensions, since they only study ‘simultaneous measures’, mathematically described with derivatives, ∂t, which are an ‘instant of time’; that is, a slice of present in the total flow of the 5^{th}6^{th} dimensions.
This was further proved by Einstein’s Relativity a theory, which is concerned with the values of ‘simultaneous measures of spacetime’, hence with the values of a relative ‘present time’.
This concept of present time derives from Galileo’s measure of speed, V=s/t, ∂s/∂t; hence ∂t=∂s/v. which is the meaning of time in standard physics.
Time is defined then in terms of space and speed (which are according to the paradox of Galileo, similar concepts of fixed space or motion space). Hence physics ‘spatializes time’; and vice versa. In those terms, space is just the perception of present time in simultaneity. Or in words of Einstein:
‘Space is measure from a simultaneous frame of reference’.
Thus physical time, ∂t, only shows a very limited ‘dharma’, or part of the entire flow of time from past (the fifth dimension) to future (the sixth dimension). In physics the fourth dimension is only present time, which is what the Riemannian geometries of Einstein’s and Minkowski’s models of spacetime study.
Time though as any child knows before it learns General Relativity, has not only the present time, the spatial ‘dharma’, or slice of the flow of time that ‘freezes’ in the field equations of Einstein. Space is a fixed perception of a time motion.
Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Then both will be an equivalent perspective on the same event.
TIME MOTION VS. SPATIAL FORM, SPATIAL CONTINUITY VS. TIME DISCONTINUITY.
A true understanding of reality in its fundamental logic principles is missed among huminds because the founders of modern science missed the notso ‘evident’ visual duality of the Universe between the 3 motions of time (lineal t, iterative hyperbolic ∏, cyclical ð) which form billions of different beings in all scales of reality, and its 3 fixed forms as perceived by its ∞ monads≈ §patial minds, @, which stiffen those motions into forms (lineal distance, $, hyperbolic bidimensional space curvatures, S and cyclical spaceinformation, §).
And the other two logic dualities between lineal, flat, small, open and cyclical, large, closed forms; and small discontinuous and large continuous parts. The 3 dualities we illustrated with the picture of Saturn’s rings also discovered by Galileo ARE all over the place in mathematical physics (i.e. lineal small steps of momentum described by Newtonian 2nd law vs. closed cyclical energy paths in the Hamiltonian/Lagrangian formalism; ∆1 quantum discrete eigenvalues in quantum physics vs. continuous differential equations in the other extreme of ∆+1 gravitational relativity, algebraic still ‘Groups’ vs. analytical ‘steps’, matrix’ Heisenberg descriptions vs. wave Schrodinger’s dynamics, etc. etc.).
It is then all the more surprising that a serious philosophy of dualities and ternary symmetries have never been explored. How is this, has to do with the automaton, mechanical praxis of modern science. In fact, the years I tried to spread among scholars 5D², as the world chair of the science of duality in the milieu of systems sciences, I was receiving questions about the ‘utility’ of this work which simply puzzled me about the nature of the humind, as I live in awe of those symmetries, like the one just explained between simultaneous superorganisms and time worldcycles. And simply concluded that huminds are not much interested in ‘the territory of truth, which is like a path on a cliff, a thin line we fear to walk through’… as a polish poet concluded. Poetry indeed being the higher Disomorphic form of verbal mirrors.
But it is not the mathematical formalism as mirror of reality truth? It is, but only a single mirror of the poetic disomorphisms of the universe, which are all based in symmetries, dualities and ternary forms.
But, and this is the biggest handicap of mankind, huminds are selfcentred and onedimensional. They want single truths. They abhor polidimensional views, as the Universe abhors vacuum – a meaningless word as all space has motion, and all time has form, and when both do not exist nothing exists.
So the concept of multidimensionality, symmetry, duality and ternary forms puts illatease most huminds. And yet without exploring the dualities and ternary symmetries of space and time dimensions we cannot start the game of existence we all play.
Of them, the most important trinities is that of coexisting planes in super organisms, the present scale, and then two ‘extra scalar dimensions’, entropy or dissolution, 4D and social evolution into wholes rule by singularity minds, 5D.
Of all this humans understand very little as they are ‘evident beings’ with a hard time looking at time, specially at the future, with its intelligent variation, always focused in the past, with its memorial forms. So we shall repeat the basic notions of reality hoping the human or robotic ‘future’ reader can memorize them.
Now we shall bring a new fundamental law or fundamental symmetry between space and time states, which illuminates its constant interaction.
As we cannot distinguish time from space states, they must appear as ‘pairs’, but as time is always a sequential flow those pairs must appear consecutively, and we shall call that flow of sequential states of which there are only 5 dimensional variations, THE 5 motions of time & space:
t≈t (3D), s≈s (1D), s<t+t>s (2D), ∆1 s>>∆+1 s (5D), t+1<<t1 (4D)…
A minimal MOTION in time and/or space, thus becomes the fundamental ‘dynamic flow’ of reality. Let us see then how the Universe moves through ‘repetitive’ or ‘s<≈>t’ feed back variations.
Motion and form, the two elements that combine into energy beings.
This is the fundamental principle of physics, called the principle of relativity:
“We cannot distinguish a motion from a still dimension (form or distance).’ Poincare…
‘as each dimension of space= form is accompanied b a dimension of motion=time, ST≈ST≈ST’.
SO WHAT WE CALL MOTION IS IN FACT A BEAT OF CHANGE, AN SS, OR TT, OR ST OR TS STEP… in a constant formmotion, informationentropy, perceptionreproduction ststst beat; as all motions can be reduced to that constant reproductive beat.
Let us then explore the concept of ðime cycles as carriers of information, and its three arrows and the systems made with them as organic elements, entropic limbs/fields, bodywaves and informative particleheads – its simultaneous perception in §pace – departing from its simplest forms, which are topological bidimensional forms.
So what IS the proper way to make sense of the galilean paradox?
Conceptually the way to go is to accept the stop and go, the dual dimensionality of all systems which are motion and form, momenta, energy, and so we move from Galilean relativity, the single being, to the holographic principle, the mind seeing it as dual motions and forms.
BUT AND THIS IS THE BREAKING INSIGHT, the still view is that of the mind – the motion view that external to our mind. So we must recast the question of relativity:
‘why minds still the motion of the Universe” And how this through relativity, distort our intaking of information as human beings?
The answer is ontological: to perceive you need a still mind mapping; motion is unfocused, and adds too much information which a small mind cannot fit if it wants to portrait a still , perceivable image of reality. THUS PARTICLEHEAD states are informative minds that stop, and wave states move the system.
But why we do see form with the mind, motion when we adopt an external point of view? To understand why we have to understand first the mind.
Because IT IS OBVIOUS THAT WHAT WE SEE AS SPACE IS A MAYA OF THE MIND, WHICH CAN BE MATHEMATIZED, OR TALKED ABOUT OR PICTURED, BUT STILL WILL BE THE ELECTRONIC MIND AND ITS CAPACITY TO PERCEIVE LIGHT IN ‘STOPNESS’ (Constancy of cspeed, which conceptually means simply, we, or rather our ‘electronic minds’ – and the electronic digital minds of atomic computers – SEE LIGHT as stopped in its source, with always the same speed.
The mind is as in that case, since electrons ‘perceive’ waves of light as stopped photons, always present in the way mankind perceives, measures, and so with its electronic instruments.
So let us then consider what the mind is, as it is obvious that there is a feedback equation going on in reality:
§@ ≈ ∆ ð
The Universe is made of ‘Motion and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind thinks otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox – the duality of stillness and motion, as we perceive the Earth still but it is moving.
Yet this paradox is indeed the proof that form, information dominates motion, because the mind prefers to see still information to blurred motion.
The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.
This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.
So often we see motion as distance – we cannot distinguish motions from dimensions of form (this is the meaning of relativity, the relativity of all motions).
The duality of motiondistance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.
It manifests in different forms in different scales. Perhaps the most important expression is the duality waveparticle, still ill understood in quantum physics.
We shall consider of its many consequences 2 of them – an objective explanation of the constancy of light speed from relativity and a footnote on its duality in quantum physics.
The physical world is dual from ‘above’ (the cosmic scale) to ‘below’ (the quantum scale), to quantum discrete motion to go ‘actions’, from the duality of motion vs. still perception or ‘Galilean>Einsteinian relativity’, to the basis of our understanding of science is the finitesimal small vs the finitely large (infinities do not exist in the metrics of the 5th dimension, hence the use of finitesimals and finite, minimal and maximal n1 quanta and U+1 worlds).
EINSTEIN’S RELATIVITY: adapting discontinuous scalar spacetime to continuous single spacetime.
Now, the next instalment of the analysis of galilean relativity between motion and stop was einstein’s special relativity and again, he, unaware of the duality of dimensions of motion and form, merely went further into the obsession of measure, translating the effects of ‘warping’ of space that shortens it, when information is imprinted by light in the previous quantum potential of lineal form, adding to the measure a ct factor of warping. This was special relativity concerned with that translation to our world where we do not see the quantum potential – hence we add the warping to scale up the process into our ‘terse’ spacetime.
And further on, we do not see the stop and go of particles and waves, and so we added the lorentz transformations to compensate in our continuous Universe, and in this manner special relativity maintained the fantasy of a continuous derivative motion universe (when it is a stop and go), and a single spacetime (when it is a scalar spacetime warped in the whole scales).
Motion and form go in pairs, advancing spacetime.
The st beatings of the Universe define 4 dimensions immediately of motion, s≈S, T≈t, S<T, T<S, which are the four fundamental motions of the Universe. BEING THE FIFTH DIMENSION, the no motion of them all in the still pure spacetime of the Mind, @.
So departing from 4 motions, we must first consider if an S≈s and a t≈T is motion: it is in the scalar growth OR DIMINUTION. WHILE the stop and Tgo, Stop, Tgo motion and form gives us the other two:
we cannot see motion and form together, the whole and its parts, we confuse lineal detailed view in short spacetime intervals with cyclical, larger slower view… such galilean paradoxes are the reflection of Space=time dualities that the mind tries to ‘conform’ into spacesimultaneous view to ‘perceive them’. (Perception being always in spacesimultaneity as still form a quanta of space=time).
The Universe is a fractal superorganism of 5 dimensions of spacetime, where the fourth dimension of parts and the fifth dimension of wholes create its scalar, organic structure, as it is made of smaller and larger super organisms of spacetime.
Those super organisms follow a fundamental logic rule, which started modern science – the realisation that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from form’ (Poncaire, Principle of Galilean relativity) according to which all motions in time can be seen as formdistances in simultaneous space and vice versa.
So we conclude that spacetime, what we perceive as motion and form is composed of 5 dimensions of space undistinguishable of its equivalent perceptions as motions of time, hence:
5 D ST = 5 Tmotions + 5 S motions (S=t).
This simple equations of the logic behind galilean relativity will suffice to explain all what exists.
As it happens two immediate consequences of the formulae is that being S=T, the maximising function of S x T (S+t being equal to K, in this case 10 dimensions), what the Universe maximises is Sxt+S=t, which given the relationship between space and information and time and entropy we write as exi+s=t, which is the function of existence of the Universe, maximise your function of existence is what all systems, do.
How we do it? Obvioulsy maintaining the balance at S=T. AND SO THE LAW OF BALANCE FOLLOWS, OF ACTION REACTION, OF ETERNAL CONSERVED MOTIONS IN THE UNIVERSE.
The simplicity of the first beats of existence, S=t, s=t, and its s=s, t=t apparent congruencies is only the beginning of an incredible adventure, the motions of reproduction of information across the five dimension of spacetime that we call reality.
The first beats of existence.
We start with 2 states: spaceform and motiontime. Space is the mindintelligence, motion the constant original substance the minds try to stop.
The mind tries on the other hand to be also in constant motion, switching perspective not to be bored, so stop and go, but as go is reproduction of form, is really inform and reproduce, and reproduction being st, and inform, @S.
The maximisation of an s=t balance happens obviously with the maximal number of s=t beats, as s and t become equalised by smaller moments and forms of it, the moving reproducing st>t>st>t ‘actual beat’ is sparkled by explosions of Ss,death.
RECAP.The 5s +5t=10 Disomorphic spacetime organisms & the Galilean paradox.
The Galilean paradox simply means there are two realities, as Descartes, founder of modern science, its method and mathematical frame of reference, rightly understood. One the @mind, which creates the fixed forms of ‘fractal §pace’ we observe (ab. @, §): §@≈∆ð.
The equation with 5 symbols, each representing one of the dimensions of the Universe of spacetime is a conceptual logic deduction of the Galilean Paradox, that expands the concepts of Galilean relativity and Einstein’s relativity to the Absolute relativity of the fractal Universe. So it is worth to detain ourselves in their understanding.
So if we consider spaceform and timemotion in its 3 parallel ‘lineal, cyclical and mixed, hyperbolic forms’ we can define 3+3 Ds:
 @: $, S, §: The perception of time cycles by an spacemind, still, linguistic, mirror of the whole Universe, which ‘seems’ in words of Descartes a devilish virtual form put on the mind. As the mind, @, generates it; we cannot deny this spatial virtual reality, even if it is not the ultimate motion reality. As the mind generates a still=spatial reality, ab. §, we need to describe also space, as generated linguistically by minds in synchronous mappings. We use again different symbols for the different ‘dimensions’ of space: $ for lineal formdistance, S, for the combined waveforms and § for cyclical and lineal space, which is CAPitalized as present is its dominant element.
 ∆: t, T, ð: An absolute external Universe, made of scalar dimension, which in each one of them shows 3 varieties of motion, lineal time motion (t), cyclic time motion, ab.ð, and its ‘combinations’ for which we shall use the CAP symbol T, as present is dominant. Where ð cyclical time is measured by frequency, ƒ=1/t, inverse to lineal time s all has in detail motion, and it is structured in ‘scales of space’ (ab. ∑§) or rather ‘planes’ (ab. ∆=∑§).
 ≈: Operandi that relates them, most often a relative equality. Since the only way we can make logic sense of it is to consider that the mind view of reality in space is parallel, similar, congruent, equal but NOT identical TO THE OUTSIDE UNIVERSE IN MOTION=TIME, with real obvious fractal scales from minimal forms in space to maximal forms.
The inverse properties of cyclic time and lineal space.
How can we translate the dualities of line and cycle, motion and form? They are inverse in a logic and geometric way. So we can describe easily the concept of space time inverted properties with a hyperbole. We shall find then that hyperbolic functions, such as e, are fundamental to define the different transformations between space and time:
In the graph a hyperbolic function between a line and a cycle. In general certain cyclical curves follow the relationship between a point of time and a lineal distance of motion.
The Universe is a 5 Dimensional fractal that reproduces vital topologies of timespace, ternary forms of motion and form, which organises into larger, slower scales of fifth dimension of ðime§pace.
Motions on 5D are either topological βidimensional changes (Galileo’s paradox) in D³, or full worldcycles (motions in 5D), and so we must be aware of both.
The main bidimensional motions of a spacetime being are motions with form, bidimensional units of:
§, $: Lineal form x Lineal form=plane of spacedistance
E, ∃: max. motion x min. form = wave of energy, entropy, expansive motion
ð: min.. motion x max. form= cyclical time, information, harmonic motion
ƒ: max. form x max. form= informative time, implosive motion.
This initial conditions set the combinatorics of topological motions as each of those bidimensional elements combine with other forming ternary, fullyfunctional, efficient systems, Γ• that can act feed, perceive, move and reproduce and evolve socially, the five actions, of survival of the vital program of any fractal of information of the Universe.
This basic motions then become repetitive in fractal selfsimilar beings as each compose motion leaves a memorial trace of previous traces that continue being traced in the same place ‘reproducing the facto the being’.
In this manner physical systems grow in form and dimensions:
Thus the CONSTANT AMBIGUITY in normal and scientific discourse, which confuses entropy and energy on one side and form and information. We can’t escape that ambiguity so we often confuse terms entropy and energy and form and information but we will try to BE PRECISE, when writing equations or explaining fundamental facts.
SO WE TRY TO DIFFERENCIATE ENTROPY AND ENERGY, and CALL FORM, in/form/ation, as here the ambiguity is far more entrenched in the normal discourse, so when we highlight form, we use ƒ and in/form/ation.
For example in E=mc²; E is e, entropy not Energy; m is ðime, an inward vortex of gravitational forces (principle of equivalence of acceleration and mass), and the energy is c x c a wave of light ðime§pace, whose hyperbolic form is in fact a combination of the cyclical mass form and the lineal, expansive entropy of the explosion.
For example, in ‘colour codes’ used by minds to differentiate the four terms, blue is the colour of pure form, red the colour of pure entropy, and its combinations are green the reproductive colour of information with more form and yellow, the colour of energy with more motion. And so the brain classifies reality with those two extreme and two intermediate colors, and we shall observe that all mindlanguages are combinations of those four elements.
Some languages are simpler, and then we have the two unperceived limits, black of form, white of entropy and combined greys. Words also have:
Formsubject (human) < energeticinformative verb or ‘action’momentum: e x i > Entropy of subject (object ab=used by the subject).
Since existence is a game of those 2, 3, 4 elements/dimensions of reality. So we define a conceptual acronym, the ‘Function of existence’:
Entropy x form = energy + Information
But in a license of the inherent ambiguity of those terms we write: e x i = st entropy x Information = ðime§pace Momentum (integrated for a long period as Energy).
To exist is thus to combine entropymotions and information, form, in a series of actions of existence, pure motions, energy feedings, perception of forms, communication of information, reproduction of both, social evolution with other forms through ‘ties’, which are flows of sharing of those elements…
Do not be scare by the ambiguity of terms, try just to realize the deep connections between them at a topologic level of form and function and when you are familiar you will learn to see reality in a much deeper way. To help we shall consider a simplified graphic of the two poles, temporal form and lineal entropy, and its energyinformation combinations.
I apologize because I tend to use information instead of form, very often as my texts of 30 years of lonely research started with the simplified model of energy and information (as that is what we perceive)
It is important though to be precise when using those terms in equations and detailed descriptions of beings and its events. So the first question is how can we measure those terms? Even if we don’t perceive. Alas! the Universe is wise and has given us ‘parameters to measure’:
PURE §pace can be measure as DISTANCE and size, S. Pure form can be measured by the frequency of the cycles of the formclock, ƒ, which in turn becomes perceivable externally as ‘density’, ‘inertia’, ‘mass’ and similar terms for each scale.
Once those dualities are understood, we can compare the properties of both, spatial entropy>energy and temporal form< information, observing the inversion of its qualities and yet, in as much as both have the same number of dimensions, energy and information can transform one into the other by transmuting those properties:
Time cycles, Tƒ Vs X Entropic Space, ΣEs ≈STmomentumactions energetic information
Timeclocks: Oform Vs. Space motion: Lineal ≈ waves
Small, still Vs. Large, moving fast ≈ Open curves
Tall, Perpendicular Vs. Long, Parallel ≈ wide, intersecting
Hierarchical Order Vs. Democratic chaosfreedom
Bidimensional Height Vs. Bidimensional Length ≈ tridimensional entity
Cyclical, Rotation, imploding Vs. Lineal, uncoiling, exploding = beating rhythm
Informative Frequency Vs. Lineal Speed = momentum
Broken form Vs. Continuous, differentiable
Intelligent, perceptive Vs. Strong, fast. = energetic top predator
Social, organic, creative Vs. Darwinian, destructive behaviour =
Future, logic path Vs. Past, trailing motion
Life arrow Vs. Death arrow. = existential world cycle
Waves of §pace Vs. Particles of Time
Female, yin principle Vs. Male, yang principle = reproduced child
Masses, charges Vs. Forces, fields = energy
Heads & senses Vs. Limbs = Bodies.
The formal=functional differences between entropy and information (organs) is a duality – the ‘Black hole Law’:
Limbs/fields of Maximal Space=Entropy x Min. Form Vs.Max. speed of Information=Minimal Spatial extension= heads & particles
For example, as the chip becomes smaller halving its size every 2 years it doubles its capacity to process information (‘Moore’s Law) The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate information, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster communication takes place within that brain and the faster it calculates and processes information in a logic manner.
If we consider that each being can be in a time or state of space, the question now is. What defines then its state?
In mathematical terms the answer is its curvature, its form, FORM becomes then the definitive element of being, as you cannot change so fast from cyclical to lineal form and viceversa, as you can between state of form and state of motion.
Cyclical time and the world cycles of existence of beings, made of a sum of ‘actions’, which become ‘arrows of time’ (spatial entropy, temporal form and its e x i =st combinations) which are ordered in sequential world cycles of time, which gives us the sensation of a cyclical time program of past to future, which we can also see as a sum of synchronous minds in which ‘knots’ of timespace actions converge, through several coexisting scales.
Duality. The inverse properties of space and time.
All this resumes into the duality states of reality between a timelike state of motion and one of perception… s>t<s>t beats of existence define motionformmotion waveform particle – motion single present space – information particle at rest in motion with ∆±1 scales… motions and forms across the three scales of ∆ s and t become then the first variations of reality, since when we realise we can play with 3 x 3 motions up and down stairs of ∆ topologies of space ages of time and combine them, the iterative game of timespace beats becomes truly a fractal infinite of timespace.
The simplest physical beat is between the spacelike state of the wave in a present motion through a single plane of continuum existence and the stop state of the particle, in informative perception through the axis that connect its singularity as a field of force with the upper and lower ∆±1 scales of existence, absorbing entropy from the lower scale (reducing its field space in an attractive vortex and emitting pure entropic faster than the wave speedlines through its axis:
The line or shortest distance between 2 points and the cycle that stores the max. quantity of information in lesser space. Both combine to reproduce the infinite beings of reality. It is the game of existence we all play.
The Principles of reality: Spacetime Duality. Ternary organs and ages. 4 åctions. ∞ Fractal Universes.
The integration of all sciences in one is the goal of General Systems Sciences or Complexity. At Macy’s the year of Einstein’s death, the highest minds of mankind came together and realized that physics had its limits and lacked despite its exhaustive understanding of Entropy and motion (as that was its purpose since its inception by Galileo) a full comprehension of information, the other element of which the simplest Universe is made.
They also realized that the mechanist view was too simple and rather theological because as Leibniz put it, needed a God that started and created the mechanism. So for the future evolution of a more comprehensive theory, they considered that all the ‘systems’ of the Universe (anything that exists), there should be at least two elements, defined by their form and function, both related to each other: Entropy or entropy or space (any expansive motion, hence perceived as extended, planar or lineal space) and information or form or time (implosive motion, hence perceived as implosive, cyclical motion). This realization is the principle in which the 5 dimensions of the Universe are based. Since we can say as Taoists philosophers that from ‘1 comes 2, from 2 comes 3’ and add ‘from 3 comes 4, from 4 comes 5 and from 5 dimensions come all the beings of the Universe’:
 Duality: The spacetime of the Universe is made of quantum of 2 types of motions: Lineal Entropy and cycles of times, whose frequency carries the information of the universe. As proved by Planck: ∑ Sp X Tƒ =K
 Trinity: All organic systems have a head made of cycles of times, limbs of quantum energies, combined in a body that reproduces both making this logic structure of motions to survive.
 5Dimensionality: Such organisms survive by performing 5 åctions. Entropy feeding, informative perception, reproduction and social evolution as herds, ∑ and networks, ∑^{2}=∏.
 The orgasm mandate: Each mathematical point of view, or diffeomorphic, local entity of spacetime will perceive reality from its own point of view and try to maximize its existence as a complementary system, ∑Sp X Tƒ=k, this is achieved at points S=T and max. ∑.
 The meaning of existence. Thus all systems try to achieve Max. ∑Sp X Tƒ=k. We call this the mandate of existence: grow in spatial Entropy and temporal information: ‘Grow and multiply… in balance between mind and body.’
What this meant is that all what you see is made of two type of realities lineal motion or Entropy and cyclical motion with more form or information. If you look at yourself, you head is spherical, cyclical. Your limbs are lineal and move. And in between you have a body that combines both forms and it is elliptic or an inverted cone, figures made of combining line and cycles.
Anywhere you look you will find all systems to have those 2 elements, Entropy limbs or fields in physics and cyclical heads or particles. So this is the first tenant of General Systems sciences, which describes the common isomorphisms of all systems of the Universe:
All what exists is a system made of 3 components, a field of motion, the energetic system, a head or particle that process and creates forms, the system of information.
In complexity the Universe is quantic. Spacetime continuum is the sum of all those spaces or motions of Entropy, of all the limbs and fields of Entropy of lineal or planar form. And time is the sum of all those cyclical motions or ‘clocks’ of all its systems.
There is not only a clock of time, our mechanical clocks, but infinite cyclical motions that happen to regulate and guide the energetic fields. So particles guide fields of Entropy, and heads guide limbs of Entropy.
This is the first ‘whole’ and its parts: a Universe of space and time is the whole. Its parts are all those quantic, lineal fields of Entropy and limbs and all those cyclical particles (charges, masses) and heads. The whole seems continuous and static because we integrate it in the mind’s picture. The parts seem broken and vital in motion. Both descriptions are valid. And the whole interacts with the parts.
For example, Relativity explains the whole. Quantum theory the parts, fields of Entropy and particles. And the whole and its isomorphisms influence its parts.
Organisms seem wholes, but then they are made of cells, of two types, informative brain neurons and somatic, body cells. And the whole influences its parts.
Time and space are like Leibniz – the most clear predecessor of organicism – thought of them: a sum of different ‘spaces and times’ as each entity that exists has a certain vital space or body of Entropy that lasts a certain duration of time or life. This brings a key duality, between Universal, ‘whole’ concepts (space and time) and particular parts (the energies and cycles of information of each part):
If space has motion and it is broken in vital spaces with extension, it is equivalent to a sum of energies. Thus space is made of ∑energies.
And if time is broken in multiple life cycles, and we consider each life cycle or duration of a complementary system a clock cycle of time, time is equivalent to all the cyclical forms or ‘in/form/ ations’ of the Universe. So time is the sum of all informations, all formsinaction, all cyclical forms.
When we add all the informative cycles of all beings and all its ‘vital energies’, we obtain absolute time and space, which ultimately is an error of perception due to the use of a single mechanical clock.
Yet when we perceive, we also eliminate motion. And so we see space quiet, as we see the Earth quiet, despite moving along paths of gravitational Entropy; or your skin quiet despite being made of cellular cycles. Thus we further reduce our knowledge of the parts gathered in a whole that appears as quiet space, with a few motions that truly matter to the perceiver – of preys, predators and individuals of the same species – while the rest of reality appears as a continuous spacetime, often represented in a continuous Cartesian, mathematical graph.
This is natural to the limits of storage of information of any perceiver, because the brain cannot hold all the fractal motions, vital spaces, time durations of the life of all beings. So it reduces information. But this has caused grave errors in human knowledge, as we believe what we see. So science tends to reductionism, considering beings things and ignoring the isomorphisms that relate all those scales.
The 3 principles of a T.Œ: duality of spacetime, åctions and 5 Dimensional planes.
The Universe is made of infinite ternary asymmetries of time/space motions/forms.
This is what we have learned so far. But the highest level of organisation of the Universe is that of topological spacetime planes, 2manifold structures put on layers that become 3 volumes with 3 type of motions and assemble into even larger systems, across deeper i±scales, piercing through the 5th dimension.
Welcome to the fundamental ‘spacetime unit’, the bidimensional plane.
In the graph we can see the topological duality of the fundamental system of the Universe, a Fractal of vital space and time cycles, a ‘Function of Exi=stence’, different in its details for each species studied by different stiences, but unified by the common topological and functional properties of spatial extensions and time cycles.
Time means, frequency clocks, closed cycles, with a frequency, Tƒ.
And the sum of those cycles with its cyclical forms that connect networks and develop motions and åctions that organize those networks of energy, are a particle or head of cyclical information, which we also represent by Tƒ, a ‘nonEuclidean pointnetworkworld of spacetime’, a spherical being made of a series of bidimensional disk and spheres, whose intelligent cycles order the world around it – what Aristotle would call the unmoved God, that moves energy around it – that is, a body/wave of energy and information which becomes complementary and inseparable of it.
‘Se, Sp means ‘space’, ‘motion=speed’ momentum or ‘energy’, concepts which are not the same but quite similar and will be explained latter in great detail.
In the Universe there are infinite clocks of time, that humans simplify with the human speed of time, in order to measure reality with a human point of view.
But a more objective, wider view of the Universe will consider each different time clock as a separate entity and each different size of space as a different spatial scale. And this is what the scalar spacetime does, enlarging the simple analysis of all those scales of size and time speeds with a single spacetime clock (the 4th dimension).
Form is function. And so the ball – the inner part of a sphere – is the perfect form of information as it is the shape that stores more form in lesser space, and the line or plane the perfect form of energy, as it is the fastest motion/biggest surface of space between two points. Space becomes then a lineal, ‘—motions’ motion or ‘energy’ and Time a cyclical, imploding form of order or information, of inverse, complementary properties.
In the graph, as a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only carbonlife organisms, made of energy (bodies, food) and information (brains, eyes, senses, worlds), but also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’. Since we can now recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms.
In the graph we can see also the essential duality of the mind, of human information, which is a static perception of the cycles of form of the Universe. And the duality between planes of space and its perception as moving speed or energy.
This duality, which we call the Galileo Paradox’, relates the geometries of information (cycles and height) with the cyclical motions of time clocks.
And it relates the lineal space with entropic, expansive, energetic ‘—motions’ and length.
And the cyclical, tall motion, O, with the time cycles and forms of information (as this page/screen extended in the dimension of height) of the Universe.
In that regard if we could resume all the properties of reality in a single equation, this would be the inverse properties of space and time, lineal and cyclical motion, and hence the balance achieved by merging both:
S <= >T Sp<=>Tƒ S/T<=> ∆±4…. Sp/Tƒ= ∆ S x T = ∆
This is truly the essence of the existential game: the constant interaction of two ‘poles’ with inverse motions, forms, properties, which however come together constantly trying to tie each other into balanced systems, from female informative, male energetic dualities, to fields and particles, limbs and heads; the two extremes constantly come together.
‘Coincidentia Opositorum’ said Nicola da Cusa, the Middle Age philosopher, who considered God, that which merged the opposites into itself. We are in that regard all Gods of existence, fractal parts that play the same game.
Now it is important that the fundamental generator of the Universe is an exchange between a polar S and a polar T of flows of energy and information. The result is across a field, a wave that imprints both and starts a process of creation of form and complementary systems (parallel events, or a Darwinian process of absorption of energy from one point to the other. To state that the generator equation of the Universe is a dynamic equation that reproduces forms with motion, and combines them, the yin and the yang with its opposite properties, is to explain the Universe in a nutshell:
Sp x Tƒ = Complementary system (constant organism), Even if S = 1/T S x T= C (constant, complementarity, translating speed, reproductive wave speed)
Universe is wise and has given us ‘parameters to measure..
RECAP
The perfect form of spatial entropy is the straight line in movement – the shortest, faster trajectory between 2 points of space – and its society, the plane. The perfect form of temporal information is the circle and its society, the sphere, which keeps the maximal information in minimal space. Both, combined, inverse forms shape the hyperbolic, wavelike, energetic bodywaves that connect lineal limbs/fields and cyclical, informative, memorial minds to become the ternary, complementary forms of all organic systems.
Thus We are all topological assemblies of:
– Bidimensional planes, which store maximal entropyspace and
– Spherical cycles, which store maximal information in minimal space.
Connected through hyperbolic energetic wavebodies that reproduce both
We can differentiate them by form, as space and entropy are lineal or planar surfaces and time and in/form/ation are cyclical. And we can see it together into beings, the simplest of which is an action of light, ext=k. And this simple duality structures all beings of the Universe. So we are made of cyclical heads and lineal limbs. Weapons are lines that release entropy. Informative machines are cyclical, and all physical systems are made of lineal forces and cyclical particles of information.
Spatial motion and cyclical form do NOT in most cases become perceived, unless they communicate. But the different between them is the way they are communicated through scales:
Energy is entropy, expansive motion and thus to translate a flow of energy it must first kill the entity it converts in energy, thus lowering two planes of existence the form converted into energy, which implies to ‘square’ the motion dimension of the ∆ST involved. Thus Energy adds to the ‘mass’ or other ‘active magnitude involved‘ two dimensions of spatial motion, V² . For example in the transformation of Mass into energy, either in classic or relativity physics derived of it, Sp=1/2mv², mc². Or if we want to express it in terms of the fundamental operandi of transfers of energy and information between planes (integration and derivation)… Energy becomes a second derivative of mass, respect to speed: m>mv (momentum, first derivative of motion)> 1/2mv², energy.
Information is form, temporal motion, and thus to transfer flows of information it must be deployed in an ∆+1 higher scale with more information (and inversely in a lower U scale) but AS FORM MUST BE CONSERVED, information cannot be transferred descending two planes of existence, where information will become fully erased, as in all processes of death (ST>ST2).
Time duration is the classic time dimension, created by uncoiling a cyclical clock of time into a lineal coordinates, which facilitates measure without a deep understanding of time. It is in that sense better to use ƒ=1/T, frequency, the inverse of lineal time which measure each step of a time clock.
Thus time is cyclical and so there are 3 type of cyclical motions:
 Expansive cyclical motion that uncoils itself releasing energy, as the back side of the clock
 Implosive time motion as a vortex or an attractive Eddie, which creates form, information.
 Repetitive, iterative, frequency motion, which is the equivalent to duration, in inverse form. It is the Present most important dimension of time, which science measures with ‘instantaneous derivatives’, v=∂s/∂t.
Science calls the ‘4th dimension’, of Time Duration, ‘Time’, and we have considered in other articles in detail the error of extending one single dimension of time, Td, to all time phenomena. It also acknowledges past expansive motions as entropy (though it does not relate it properly to the t in the v=s/t time formula for time duration). And it studies information and acknowledges in biology the informative arrow of the universe as a future arrow. But physics still ignores it stuck in studies of a limited part of reality (heat processes and space between galaxies and lineal inertial motion). So it still ignores that atoms, cyclical rotational forms, the vortex of galaxies where we live and life processes do show an arrow of future information.
So those 3 ‘arrows of time’, Past entropy, Tp, Present iterative åctions or duration, Td and future, formal motions, Tf, are the 3 arrows of time.
Past and future as motion and space.
There is a correspondence between the inner physiological networks that perform EXI actions and the relative dimensions of the being.
Forms respond always to functions/actions in time, the commanding dimension of reality, to which the forms diffeomorphically adapt to obtain the maximal energy and information and accomplish their actions. Hence only the topological properties of the form, intimately related to its functions are conserved. So once a ternary topological form is created, it will adapt and evolve those topologies, deforming their external membrane, creating complex warped, fractal, branched internal physiological networks that act as fixed paths of energy and information, diversifying its organs and yet at the end of the road, the same topologies, albeit sometimes difficult to recognize will form a ternary being, which will deploy the same 4 actions of existence with those topologies and internal networks/forces.
Absolute relativity accepts the principle of diffeomorphic, local measures. Since each species is a ‘universe in itself’, with different relative, energetic and informative arrows that determine its ‘whole’ morphology. Thus, each species establishes its own up and down arrows or relative energy and informative directions. In the graph, animals use light as information and plants, use light as energy. So both have opposite energytime coordinates. Yet both have an ‘anteroposterior’, lineal’ ‘outward’ energy oriented structure. Galaxies and other forms of the previous graph have a cyclical, informative, inward structure, where the stars body absorbs energy from intergalactic space, reproduces matter with it and feeds the internal informative knot of gravitation, the black hole.
Form is the first mathematical invariance, which is dynamized by physical motion. And both together determine the allowed actions of the universe. Those actions have a causal order given by the timefrequency invariance. And finally all of them together give birth to the social evolution of parts into wholes, creating the fractal Universe with its ‘5th dimension’ of scalar, social evolution. We shall not though do a rigorous, formal and causal analysis of them but try to explain them in a way easier to understand, starting from the concept of an action of energy and time, the two parameters from where all the elements of the Universe depart
RECAP. The 4dimensional Universe is a game of 3 topologies of space, which correspond to 3 functions in time, the energetic, spatial, concave, spherical or planar membrane; the reproductive, cyclical, toroid body; and the hyperbolic, warped, informative, still center of perception.
This limited structure produces infinite selfsimilar forms in which a central zero point absorbs energy that transforms in still perception, a toroid body reproduces selfsimilar cycles and forms and limbs and membranes move the whole system, in search of its action of existence…
In the graph, the Universe constantly combines the 2 elements of any action, energy and time, in different number of ‘dimensions’ creating entities that maximize a simple but extremely powerful equation:
E< = > I, (Max. E x I), stable forms.
But E, =, I, X are symbols that convey many more operations than those first essential forms. Since the equation acts as a mirror of an eternal number of complementary forms that combine what we call energy – a body able to do work and what we call information a point of view able to gauge information. Those 2 elements will then derive in each scale of reality in systems with a field of energy and a particle of information (physics) a body of energy and an information Head (biology) or a network of information humans/machines or ‘upper class’ of a social organism and a body/herd of energy humans.
We already saw that time and information are intimately related as time is measured by the frequency of a cycle, which also carries the patterns of information of any system.
Now we go a step further considering the relationship between the spatial perception of the scales of the Universe and the temporal perception of those scales as they evolve and create more complex systems.
Since the 5^{th} dimension of the scalar Universe from past to future is born of the social evolution of simpler systems into more complex ones.
Indeed, the scalar structure of the Universe is created by the arrow of information or complexity that creates more complex fractal, social ‘planes of existence’ over which new complex structure grow. So the vacuum space, which is in fact a volume of electromagnetic radiation (lightspace), constantly fluctuates and condensates into more complex particles, which condensate into atoms, molecules and so on. And each science has studied one of those scales. There is though the need for a science, which studies all of them together and analyzes the relationships between 3 given scales, i, i1 and i+1. This science has been the theme of my research for 20 years, in which I have made many astounding discoveries, being the most important of them, the realization that the laws between the ‘particles’ of any 3 scales (for example, the particle, the atom and the molecule; or the cell, the human being and his society) are the same – hierarchical laws, entropy laws, social laws, etc. Hence the Universe is absolutely relative.
In detail though, the ‘5^{th} dimension’ – the entire world of those scales, can be divided in 3 subdimensions, which we shall call, the 4^{th} dimension of present (the concept of time in physics, hence equivalent to Einstein’s time in its spacetime continuum or human scale), the 5^{th} dimension of all past scales inferior to humans with lesser complexity, and the 6^{th} dimension of future, more complex, informative beings.
The reader in that sense must make the conceptual jump from his belief in a single Absolute Time, which is just a human measure of time based in a mechanical clock, sum of all the cycles of time of the Universe, and understand that absolute future and past are also relative; that is, in the future the Universe will complete its cycle and explode back into the simplest energy, or ‘absolute past’, which will be therefore in our ‘future’ if you stick to the concept of lineal time.
Yet if you abandon that error of science and understand cyclical time, you will see the Universe as an eternal game that fluctuates between its bigbangs and bigcrunches, on the bottom of the relative past of pure energy and the relative future of pure form. As each of its parts fluctuates between its birth and its death that returns its information back to the past, and we shall return to this when studying the invariance of life/death cycles
The graphic also shows that the main task left to science is the study in depth of the 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future.
And it shows how each new scale includes the previous scales, which support it: so the galaxy requires its planets inhabited sometimes by life beings, which require the emergence of cells that require the emergence of molecules and so on.
This Russian doll concept, both in terms of timemotions and spatial forms, is another of the peculiar features of the 5^{th} dimension, which is based in information, not in energy, elements which have very different properties not fully understood by classic physics, which has expanded and studied in depth motion and energy but still ignores some basic features of information. So the differences between those 2 concepts, energy and information, and its selfsimilar ones, spatial surfaces and clocks of time, will be the next field of our inquire.
The meaning of time arrows; choices of future.
Let us try to explain it simpler: at any moment of time, a system will have not ONLY the choice of future given by the arrow of entropy – explosive motion, disorder, and dissolution=death, which Physicists have studied so well with lineal, formless time (bigbang theory of the Universe, worldly profession of entropic weapons, obsession for motions, and its machines, etc.)
It will be able also to decide two other choices: to repeat, reproduce, iterate its present ‘conserved’ energy’ momentum (a wave repeating its form, a motion repeating its steps, a human cooking again an omelette to extract energy from it).
And to evolve into a tighter informative ‘configuration’. So the future will have always three choices, three arrows, three elements to be enhanced. And this choice will be at the core of every model of the future, every understanding of the paths of a system, not only in physical motions=changes in timespace, but also in biological systems, made with entropic limbs/fields, bodywaves of energymomenta and headsparticles of information, to be able to switch constantly between the three states of the being.
The conclusion is obvious: time arrows, which means modes of change in philosophy of science, cannot be reduced only to a simple formula of Galilean or Einstein’s relativity related to spatial changes ‘only’ (v=∂s/∂t; s²=x²+y²+z²c²t² in Einstein’s relativity.)
Those studies, worthy as they are, concern mainly the analysis of space and the simultaneity of ‘present, derivative’ instants and distances or external motion and position. And to that aim, all the internal time cycles and process of change and ageing of information are ignored. So beings are studied as pointparticles all subject to a larger single clocktime rhythm, that of the external spacetime galaxy and its ‘cspeed=s/t’, which is used as a ‘constant rod’ of measure, coupled to a human mechanical clock that equalises all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species.
So we have now the fundamental elements of an external description of reality (still we do have to define the internal element, the ∆ºmind).
On one hand the three arrows of time and its simultaneous existence in space. On the other hand the scales of the fifth dimension.
We can see the essence of the fifth dimension of scalar spacetime and its dual arrows of entropy (studied exhaustively by physicists) and information (grossly underated and misunderstood) – to be the ‘scaffolding’ for the reproductive world cycles of existence of all ‘supœrganisms’, which repeat once and again the same forms of information:
Systems made of networks of atomic/cellular or individual elements selforganise, emerge as wholes and ‘live’ through 3 ages of increasing information (life arrow), reproducing in the balanced middle age of the system, S=T, ending in an entropic explosion of death that erases the information of the system.
1st ÐIMOTION: INFORMATION AND LANGUAGES
GENERATION: SEEDS & MINDS: ∆ð≥ §@
The first Dimotion of existence, contrary to common belief, is not translation in space, whose dominance in human ‘sciences’ is due to the extraordinary development of physics of locomotion, itself a byproduct of the mechanical culture of machines and weapons, we live in…
Indeed, to move one has first to perceive the direction of motion. Perception of information moreover can be achieved in the stillness of being a mere particlepoint – in fact it requires stillness to perceive ‘form’ with no blurring motion.
In that sense we distinguish two fundamental forms of being in the first dimotion, as a mind that perceives an external world in the stillness of a language, mirror of the Universe. And as a seed of memorial information that will then generate an entire super organism, by unfolding according to the sequential order of those dimotions in time, a world cycle of existence, which we study in great depth in the first line.
We use to symbolize the first dimotion a simple Ilogic symbolism: ∆ð≥ §@; that is all the flows of time cycles of the Universe ‘implode’ (>) and yet magically keep a resemblance ≈ as they do so into a linguistic mindmapping, when it is an external world what ‘collapses’ or a seed of information, when it is the internal world what it collapses. Then in both cases, an inverse motion of time space will expand the ‘collapsed image and its selforder’ back into reality, creating a territory of mental order or a clone super organism.
The closeness between seed and mind is in that sense one of the most fascinating fields of study of the Ilogic of the pentagonal time space organism.
SEEDS
Existence is a game played in two different realities, a single plane of spacetime, ∆ø that of the organisms and its territory of order, which the mind perceives. And that of the different scales of size in which the being coexist, the closest ∆±1 cellular territory of smaller parts, and larger world… and the ∆±¡ scales which they system uses to absorb its pixels of energy, form and motion=entropy.
Amazing as it might seem to the reader, who didn’t even know there was a 5th dimension on the Universe beyond rock stars, the structure both of the organism through its cellular, individual and organic social scales, ∆±1 and the exchanges of energy, information and entropymotion with the ∆¡≥2 are the SAME for all systems of Nature. And this astounding realization allow us to fully organize the whole range of actions and exist¡ences of the entire Universe according to 5D metric and the exchange of actions of the being.
Indeed, actions are connected to scaling to the point that any true motion in nature requires a motion and ‘translation’ of the being through scales of the fifth dimension. As all motion is ‘reproduction’ of form, into an adjacent region of reality after a travel through the lower ‘scales’ of the fifth dimension.
In the graph we see how a particle reproduces as a wave, then stops, gauges information and reproduces again in the quantum realm. In the left side we see the reproductive growth of a system as it emerges into the ∆+1 organic and world scales.
So the knowledge of the laws of ‘scales’ in a far more vital, dynamic way, through the actions of the being is essential to understand the ‘architectonical, symphonic Universe’ of layers and scales.
Social evolution, information and generation.
Contrary to belief, the most important dimension of the Universe is a static dimension, with no motion and hardly any volume (: The dimension of the seed or mind that stores in stillness all the potential information of a future super organism, or a mind mapping of the territory of order in which the organism will ‘create’ its selfcentred reality.
The beginning of reality thus start in a static seed of information, the central Aristotelian unmoved God of a territory of order which will organise its moving vital energy, as it grows and multiplies as a seed or moves and acts as a mind with a will, reflecting its inner form into the larger world, to finally grow and multiply from its ∆1 ‘finitesimal size’ or relative ‘o’ to become 1. So we write with the formal symbols of ¬Æ logic:
5D: ∆1 ∑∆1 > ∆º
That is a seed of information in a lower plane, ∆1 starts to reproduce, ∑, collapsing through its network structures into a whole super organism of the larger ∆º scale, emerging as a new individual being.
As we study fully the entire process of generation, evolution, reproduction and worldcycle of existence in the 3rd line, we shall concentrate on the mind.
@:
SPATIAL INFORMATIVE MINDS
Absolute Relativity: Ego Paradox
‘Each (fractal NonE) point is a world in itself” Leibniz, on reality=∑∞Mind’s equations:
0 S: infinitesimal Spatial mind x ∞ T: Universe’s time cycles= Constant World
The Universe is a tapestry of time∞pace cycles which are organisms of vital energy enclosed by an angular momentum, selfcentered into singularities with an aristotelian, lineal inertial selfish mind, programmed by an obsession, to survive, last in time, performing its actions, the program of exist¡ence, beyond a reasonable finite presence – this thirst for immortality through selfish actions selfcentered in the lineal inertial singularity moving ahead in open freedom, however is always defeated by the larger whole that pressures us into making a closed, conservative path, an informative world cycle. And we indeed oblige, as the ego paradox produces a systemic bias towards our own self, exhausting the energy of our vital space.. till we die – explore back into a zero sum. Welcome to reality.
It is essential to start afresh and be able to switch on and off between the subjective singularity point of view of an infinite universe of local diffeomorphic points of view or singularities of ‘time zero’ (where the motion of the angular momentummembrane finally rests into the still linguistic image of the mind, ∆ð>§œ, to feel from this essential equation the meaning of it all. The vortex singularity point will then use that cyclical angular momentum>Vital energy>Singularity stillness 3 ‘phases’ of the world cycle, from Maximal Spatial extension (in the angular momentum) to the zero stillness of form, of perception of gauging information in its center, through the vital energy processes that fed the body wave before arriving to the singularity.
THAT IS THE GAME IN INFINITE TOES.
SO space and time do exist in infinite fractal closed paths with a vital energy inside… selfcentered in the masssingularity or active magnitude
This is what we study – the game of infinite fractal ternary systems of conserved singularity momentum, angular momentum=membrane and vital energy enclosed between them. How this simple ternary scheme can explain it all. How it travels through the scales of the fifth dimension to create the organic Universe, to live its world cycle to try to remain infinite and immortal from its povs, thirsty of power, to deflate finally as membrane and singularity detach from each other in the death process… to study its parts, its aeiou, actions of simplex survival (aei, moving, feeding on energy and information) and complex (social love and reproduction, ou). All this in its infinite iterations, sychronicities, networks, social organizations, is what we study and use to that aim two methods – the spatial simple slice analysis through the fractal generator, in its simplest form, ∑∆ð≥§@…
The equation of the mind.
‘The smallest point is a world in in itself’
Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality:
The fractal point=world of spacetime.
In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin>European>Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and the description are the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best.
Soonly organicism is real in the whole sense of the Universe, while languagesmirrors are local orders.
The EGOCY of our present, entropic age of human civilization rejects this (Precisely because it is becoming dissolved). So we reject the power of networks – selfmademan myths and tribalism in history. Yet networks are more powerful and survive.
How this work on languages IS OBVIOUS: LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:
In the graph, which I redesigned from” road to irreality” (: a work by Penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician along his friend Hawking, which shuns off the laws of the experimental method) his view of reality is VOID as in all PLATONIC (PLATO by the way never said that, they should be called Pythagorean, a much more primitive ‘magic view’) of HARDWARE MINDS and LOCALITY. In his view the Language creates the Universe.
In reality the Universe is a fractal organism, and as all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘Spacetime’, which are Organic because that is the main property of coexistence in different planes (∆§cales), topological because that is the main property of Spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and Logic, Multicausal, as that is the main property of the dimotions of time.
So the ultimate causality ∆>T>S IS not Platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties > TLogic properties > STopologic, mathematical properties.
In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘Social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the Universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we REPEAT, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆scalar properties, STopologic ONES.
SO WE ADAPT PENROSE GRAPh to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:
The ∆§T BioTopoLogic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking selfsimilar. And then THE LANGUAGES REINFORCE AS MIRRORS EXPANDED INTO REALITY those properties ordering local territories.
So the graph shows that back and forth to adequate to how REALITY IS created LOCALLY by ‘minds‘, which are the language software on the hardware brains of T.œs, ONLY after the language reflects the LIVING cycles (dimotions) of all timespace beings with those properties:
You can see in the graph how it works: First the whole Universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak ONLY THE TERRITORY OF ‘ARISTOTELIAN’ ORDER OR BODYWAVE ENERGY OF THE SYSTEM…
THE DRAWING in original Penrose ONLY had the mind ordering the Universe, as the source and only God in Aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (bodywave) around it’.
So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is AS IN CRYSTALS ABLE TO FORM mirrorimages in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or dimotions) are the language of it all:
Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.
Minds ad to the world the arrow of form, information, intelligence, language, stillness: S@.
Time space though has also a psychological point of view, as it carries information. So from the pov of the mind time is the speed of processing information ha gives us he feeling of time passing, and it is also, the origin of the equation.
The point of view is an observer that gauges reality with its first action, O, a mere rotation in spacetime.
The cycle thus evolves into a point of view with angular momentum, the minimal action of the Universe. And in this manner starts its adventure, through the function of existence, till completing its worldcycle of life and death in space time.
We are all worlds of spacetime, worldcycles which go on doing cyclical actions between birth and death – just a travel of a worldcycle through the 5^{th} dimension, which encompasses them all, and orders its species through a new dimension of time, from past to future, from the infinitely small to the infinitely large, from the infinitely slow to the infinitely past, back and forth, back and forth, Sp < => Tƒ <= >Sp…
The 5 ilogic postulates define the unit of reality as a fractal point that observed in detail is in itself a World, which contains within it all the mathematical topologies of the 4D cosmos. This can be deduced in a logic manner, through the equation of a mind/p.o.v., which can map out as a mirror the whole Universe we perceive in its infinitesimal mirror.
In the fractal Universe all systems of ilogic information gauge reality, transforming a force they absorb into a logic language, which mirrors the Universe. It is obvious that the essential particles, quarks, photons and electrons cannot have a wide mapping of reality unless the fractal scales of size are infinite (and then an atom might be the upper bound of a new scale – a nanogalaxy).
Yet even if reality has upper and lower limits of size and pointlike particles are not fractal world but the limit of universal form, those simple particles still gauge information and store some type of logic, mathematical computerlike structure that allows them to behave as they do, organically. Since particles orientate their position in a herd of selfsimilar particles; they move towards light, its energy, when the electromagnetic field is in its neighborhood and they decouple=reproduce into new particles when they absorb more energy.
All those properties are the minimal properties we ascribe to a fractal ‘point of view’ or ‘mind’ in a broad sense – a structure that gauges energy and information, creating smaller fractal mirrors of reality. Such structure has within itself a minimal amount of geometric paths and logic processes that allow it to form the forces it uses as energy and information source. We thus call such structure a mind. Since any point of the Universe becomes a focus of infinite parallel forces that flux into the point, creating a static image of reality in Complexity, we define a Mind, as an infinitesimal mirrorworld that reflects the infinite Universe:
0 (Mindcell) × ∞ (Universe) = Linguistic Wor(l)d
The equation of the mind, defined by the 1^{st} and 5^{th} postulates of illogic geometry, sets limits of truth in linguistic science, comparing the worlds created by any mind and the Universe at large, much bigger than any informative, mental, linguistic image we have of it.
It is however the why that explains why entropy doesn’t dominate the Universe; since now the increase of order and information in the Universe is mainly caused by those ‘perceptive points’ that gauge information. Those points might or might not be conscious in a vegetative or reflexive way, depending on its complexity; but they are ‘aperceptive’ – an expression coined by Leibniz to express perception without consciousness. And so they have a will to order and perceive more information, not only a will to feed and increase their energy. And so there are two ‘wills’ of feeding and gauging common to all points, which we can measure objectively, externally by the fact that when energy appears, particle move towards energy (so electrons jump and feed on light) and when other particles appear they gauge their distances. We observe this property in all systems when they form a focus, which emerges as the point of maximal order in which the network of the system integrates its information.
Then the system becomes more stable: A crystal grows faster when the network creates a central point. A hurricane can be destroyed when the central, still point where all the flows converge is disturbed. A life being becomes erratic in its motions when it becomes blind. A galaxy acquires order when a black hole, which probably gauges gravitational information, appears in its center.
The existence of an infinite number of such points is undeniable objectively and adds an enormous amount of order to the Universe, which mechanist science does not account for. Stillness to focus information into a pixeled map of the Universe, and the existence of a network that fluxes in that point through which ‘infinite parallels’ can cross, are the two conditions of formation of gauging points.
Then we can establish the birth of a complementary network of energy and information, an exi=stential point: exi=k; where k represents a ‘mapping of reality’ in the informative language that the waves of communication of the point with the external universe have created. This means that the models of metric measure developed by mechanist science merely creates a ‘spacetime world’ selfsimilar to the mind of man in our machines, which does not exhaust all the measures of the Universe and its possible mappings. We cannot construct if we want to account for all the cycles of time, dark spaces and events of reality, a theory based only in a continuum, mechanical, lightspace and its Euclidean coordinates of lightmeasure.
The limits of that model have been reached, as the limits of precision of the Ptolemy’s model of astronomy were reached in the Renaissance. Those limits of an Euclidean, continuum spacetime were proved by Riemann, Poincare, Mandelbrot and this author, expanding and completing the Euclidean postulates. Einstein applied part of those new models and created Relativity Theory. This work applies the rest of those discoveries to create a model of Multiple Spacetimes, which includes the concept of absolute relativity, where measure – the gauging and mapping of the external universe by a nonEuclidean point, is relative to the observer and the rods of measure it uses.
And the process of reducing and stopping the motions of the Universe in that process is the first step to fully understand both relativity of motion and the structure of the mind.
In that regard, a deep error in mathematical physics and its models which ignore the 5 DIMOTIONS of time, is the use of a faulty logic in mathematics and physics based in single causality.
ILOGIC MATHEMATICS: THE FORMALISM OF MINDS: NONÆ FRACTAL POINTS.
All this said, it is interesting to improve the spatialgeometrical mirror of maths on the minds, which is expressed by the 5 Postulates of none geometry images of the 5 Dimensions of the Universe.
Let us then consider how those spatialgeometric mirrors can improve the description of spatial minds, studying the seemingly equivalent 1st and 5th noneuclidean postulates that describe a fractal point:
In the graph, the mind is the formalism of the Universe, as it is a linguistic object that create ‘space’ by shrinking the dimensions of the cycles of spacetime, to fit a opoint, eliminating the fifth dimension of scales, reducing perception to the ∆º scale in which the mind’s super organism exists, reducing motion to fit a still mapping, shrinking it as a topological sphere (Poincare’s Conjeture) and eliminating by ‘bifocal’ vision, the third dimension of depth.
ALL THIS gives birth to a ‘fractal point’, which allows a relative ∞ number of parallel flows of entropy, energy and information to ‘cross a single point that becomes larger when we come closer to it (5th postulate of nonEuclidean geometry, basis of the relativistic r=evolution of physics of the XX century that now ∆ªS≈T enlargers to explain all ‘linguistic mindsmonads’ to find the ‘whys’ of the Universe.
Once we show that information is merely the still perception by a ‘linguistic mind’ of the frequency and form of the time cycles and repetitive actions of the system, hence conclude that the Universe reproduces ‘timespace cycles’, the conclusion is obvious: we are all timespace organisms, organisms of spatial energy and temporal information, made to the image and likeness of the whole, which follow the same (‘isomorphic) laws of all other time space beings.
Those laws are spatial=topological and temporal=biological, as the actions and motions of all systems have the goal of survival, without need of consciousness, in as much as those systems that do not repeat its information do not survive into the future and no longer exist.
Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single spacetime continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath.
However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of spacetime’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those spacetime systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.
So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, NonEuclidean point with spacetime parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational spacetime. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of NonEuclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of spacetime were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of ‘—motions’ and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point.
This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels. So we must consider that what Einstein proved using NonEuclidean points to explain the structure of spacetime is its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact selfsimilar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact selfsimilar structures to the macrostructures we see with the naked eye.
That is in essence the meaning of Fractal NonEuclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of spacetime’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘NonEuclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of ‘—motions’ and information that defines them.
Einstein found that gravitational SpaceTime did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:
Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel
Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:
Abstract, continuous, onedimensional point:
. ____________
Instead Einstein found that the spacetime of the Universe followed a NonEuclidean 5th Postulate:
A point external to a line is crossed by ∞ parallel forces.
Real, discontinuous, ndimensional points: ===========o
This means that a real point has an inner spacetime volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that NonEuclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with spacetime parts.
So spacetime is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a celllike point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a pointlike nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many pointlike atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.
So each point is in fact a 3dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on. Yet those dimensions are the socalled fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point.
In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: To be a fractal world, a spacetime in itself.
‘Any NonEuclidean point is a fractal spacetime with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the st+1 ecosystem in which it exists’
The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they actreact accordingly.
The fundamental particle of the Universe is not a physical form but a logic particle: a knot of time arrows, which in any scale of reality, from physical particles (quantum knots of ‘—motions’ and information) to biology (knots=networks that absorb ‘—motions’, information and reproduce and evolve into bigger knots) act under a single mandate: to maximize those time arrows, a fact that we formalize with an equation, the function of Existence: Max. ∑Sp x Tƒ; which is the fundamental function of both, logic and mathematical languages. In the graph, all such points of view, will define a system of relative perpendicular coordinates, through which it will enact its time arrows, departing from a central knot of information.
In the graph, apperception of the Universe happens by reducing the cycles of time into a single spherical point, according to the topological properties of all spherical systems, which can diminish in size without deformation.
This is called the Poincare Conjecture, (his recent proof by Mr. Perelman was the most important finding on mathematics in decades). It simply speaking only nspheres can reduce without limit an ndimensional Universe into a fractal mirror without deformation and tearing. And that is why there is a fundamental dominant membranepoint system in all the organisms of the Universe, which creates the order of reality. The paradox though is that the membrane, the time cycle is moving very fast, and the point in the center is a static mind.
Formal, topological definition of timepoints: minds, and spacefields.
‘Each point holds a world in itself’ Leibniz
As we shall repeat once and again, the true colossus of science have been his philosophers NOT his physicists, though Planck and Einstein, once philosophy of science waned, have value in its statements. Aristotle, Descartes & Leibniz thus form the triad of intuitive geniuses GST will when fully developed consider its western pioneers. Let us then translate their ‘monadintutions’ in a formal topological definition:
“A mind singularity is a point of time displaced in its latitude of synchronous clocks speeds that occupies a single quanta of space, a field is a extension of simultaneous space enclosed in a single quanta of time.”
We concluded earlier that pure time, the absolute arrow is that of the fifth dimension, relative time is the world cycle as it ends always in a zero moment, lineal time duration is a distortion of cyclical time, made continuous by pegging cycles of time one after another.
How can then we define properly relational time and space in formal terms? In the previous sentence we resume the concept, which takes the inversion of informative time and entropic space to its natural limits.
They will be the formal limits of the being – its linguistic mind that stores all the information of the system in a single pointquanta of space (atom, cell, citizen); and can be better understood closer to humans in our social systems: a point of time or mind in a nation is the king, president of the nation, a single quanta of its space population; which is connected through the physiological networks of information of the system (the laws) to all the quanta of space who obey, and become synchronised by it.
The quanta of the galaxy is the black hole, a single central volume similar to that of a star, connected by gravitational forces to all its stars; and your ego, likely will be a single neuron of maximal communication with all its other neurons, themselves connected to all other cells; in the super organism of history we call a religion, it is the prophet whose memetic DNA connects it to all other believers in time. A POINT OF TIME, thus is a mind and it will be structured through causal time in its connection to other beings through synchronicity.
On the other hand, a extension of space exists simultaneously in a quanta of time, and so its extension will paradoxically depend of the underlying speed of its upper or lower (relative concept) scale that ‘entangles it’ through simultaneous networks of communication, sychornizing its motions. Those are laws of quantum physics, illunderstood, which can be extended to all other systems of the Universe. This introduction just gives glimpses to the whole sheer magnificent structure of the ∆±i ST universe.
Now the key to the work of those systems is the different speed of information carried by different frequency of time cycles in each scales, what allows the synchronous behaviour of all of them, guided by the fastest more complex ‘knot of timeinformative cycles – which is the mindmirror.
So we shall now consider the key element of reality a mind that synchronises in time all the systems and cycles of an organism and creates a ‘world in itself’ enclosed by a cyclical membrane – able to act on the Universe and ensure the survival of the system. This is the origin of the mind as the 5th dimension of the whole, which makes possible existence of beings:
The mind has a fundamental role: to embody the perception of the whole super organism and as such is rightly considered the 5th dimension of the being.
Theory of Measure: 01 probability sphere vs. 1∞ Cartesian plane.
IN THAT REGARD in mathematical terms the difference between a Mind and a seed can be established in terms of the equivalence (measure theory) between the o1 probabilistic sphere, which will be the equivalent to the palingentic seed and the selfcentered cartesian frame, which will be the view of the mind ordering an open external territory. In terms of the Galilean dualities, the seed is a ‘closed’ domain and the mind an open one entangled with the territory it orders:
01th dimension (o1 unit cicle in probabilistic temporal terms as expressed in the linguistic mirror of mathematics): the generative cycle which brings finitesimal parts into an integral and defines also the Unit of NonEuclidean mathematics, a fractal point that grows in information as we come closer to it, allowing infinite parallels to cross.
Now this 01th dimension will be the main theme of the blog, because it is the less understood – we didn’t even consider it in classic ‘science’ (as opposed to ‘stience’, science of spacetime beings’) before.
We have use for it the yellow color in the previous graph… so you can see the flow of colours, though more properly should be a blue… the birth of colours in the highest, shortest frequency, and then go down to end in red.
The 01th dimension is closely related though to the fifth dimension of ‘growth in planes of existence’ of the Universe. And when we study the formalism of NonEuclidean mathematics we shall see that the first notion/postulate of Euclid, DEFINITION of a point with nobreath and its 5th postulate (points and parallels) are essentially the same concept that must be reformed.
So the 1ST postulate shows in function and motion the evolution of finitesimals, ∑∆1 into wholes, ∆o ‘first units’ of the new social evolution in the 1∞ plane, as an ∆beings which will evolve socially in an external ∆+1 world.
5th dimension: the world, and by extension the whole range of scales.
ONCE THE O1TH emerges, and further develops its 3D ensemble of lineal moving limbs/fields, Oparticles/heads and Øhyperbolic body waves, the 123 ensemble will exist in an outer 5D world, part of an infinite Universe.
The 5th dimension is the sum of all the infinite scales of the Universe, which going upwards will be called the 5th dimension of social evolution (biological view), integral, polynomial growth (Mathematical, physical view), which convert each new o1 temporal unit circle of a finitesimal in a first 1 of a new 1∞ scale till creating a new super organism.
The real order of absolute time, being natural to the fact that for a larger whole to appear the 01 ∆1 finitesimal one, must exist first.
Hence the 01th dimension of generation before birth; of a pure seed of information is the beginning of all games of existence.
And we can observe this 01TH point in terms of information either as a seed or as a linguistic mind born to order an external territory.
In quantum physics it allows the unification of two scales, so long seek, as the o1 probabilistic sphere will be the quantum ‘seed’ of the 1∞ thermodynamic wscale treated with statistical populations; theme we shall some day explored in full mathematical gear in the 4th line.
PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: DUAL @ SINGULARITY (CHARGEMASSEDDIE).
A key element of a physical system is the singularity ‘membrain’, which includes as in any key system of nature, a center that processes information and a membrane that encloses and breaks the system into an inner region, the T.œ and an outer region, the Universe. This dual system IS the COVER AND CENTER of a topological open ball, which is the vital energy enclosed by the system, which DOES NOT EXIST as a full T.œ unless those 2 elements are formed. Consider the case of ‘Mass’. Energy contributes to ‘mass’, but if we do NOT have an enclosure we cannot measure mass, as energy is moving around and there is nothing to ‘weight’. Yet as soon as we close the membrane, the mass parameter will exist, as measured externally by the membrane.
Further on, as the membrane is CLOSING the inner region, which we normally do NOT access, or else we will have to tear the membrane and then mass might escape and a continuity equation will have to be applied to assess the flow of mass in and out, we cannot truly measure the mass.
It is then obvious that the ‘parameter’ of ‘densityweightchargeangular momentumrotational speed’ etc, tends to accumulate in each scale in the external region, where the ‘massforce’ is maximal; while in the inner singularity center, it reaches ‘zero value’, and that point is the mindstill singularity, where motion stops, and so in black hole equations time moves to zero in the singularity, in the vortex of an Eddie.
The dimensional question: 1D singularities + 2D membranes (holographic information) = 3D vital energy.
It is obvious that the eye of the hurricane and the eye of the black hole has maximal height as it is indeed the informative center of the system, in fact ‘infinite height’ in the axis of a black hole, which means that ‘motion stops’ in the perpendicular plane but shuts off as a yet of dark entropy and matter through the axis of superluminal speed according to the Kerr equations of a rotating black hole.
Singularities as ‘doors’ to new 5D scales/dimensions.
I always have a riot with philosophers of science coming from the amateurish field of 4D physics – the likes of my ‘acquaintances’ Mr. Penrose and Mr. Hawking, with whom I have been involved not always in the best of terms, due to my activism against the Black Hole Factory – when they come around with their ideas that black holes are ‘doors to the past’, and ‘new dimensions’.
As all in reality is a biased mind perspective in fact all has a bit of truth. It is impossible to go the past and kill your father, because time is local.
All clocks of time are local and only act within the membrane of angular momentum which is the time proper and its inner ‘vortex’ with slow time motions, dominated by the two elements of the T.œ, which are synchronized – the membrane and the particlehead in the center.
Both are synchronized in time to this angular momentum outer clock to dominate the slower vital energy in the center. So now we can related the 3±i fundamental ‘parameters of reality to form and function and the 3 conserved substances; since:
Time clocks are the angular momentum membranes conserved in the Universe.
Space is the vital surface enclosed by those membranes, which in itself is an open entropic, expansive surface that only under the constrains of the limiting membrane acquires order, form (and can be parametrized mathematically as any student of calculus knows: to find solutions to equations it is always required a ‘constrain and limiting parameter’).
Scale finally has its origin in the very definition of a mind and its equation as a singularity: Omind x ∞ time cycles (universe) = Constant linguistic still mirror mapping… Indeed, we could IMAGINE A NONSENTIENT UNIVERSE WITH NO SINGULARITIES, WHICH WILL EXIST IN A SINGLE PLANE OF SPACETIME CONTINUUM, AS THEN it is not needed to ad on the monad’s inner infinitesimal view of the whole, which reduces its volume by eliminating motion and dimensions of perception to fit a ‘crystal mirror’ image within it. And so by the correspondence principle because 4D physicists do deny singularities, it is indeed not required a 5Dimension to ‘navigate’ the locomotions of a single physical world, but even if the 4D nonsingularity models of physicists do work, it will NEVER find the whys of existence which are provided precisely by the singularity that also ‘creates’ the inner fractal worlds of the mind.
And so the coda is as mystical, beautiful and intense as it comes: the mind IS the site of EVERY smaller scale, and so the Black hole has a mindmirror in 5 Dimensions (maldacena’s conjeture) of the 4D larger galaxy brain. Your mind has a homunculus smaller mirror of the whole organism you observe, and the crystal of the visual reflected Universe above.
THE MYSTICAL CODA is immediate. As we are small, we MUST be part of a mind that ‘imagined’ us… What is that mind, we shall discuss when studying the evolution of Mother Earth as we are the mind of the Earth in its outer membrane.
And viceversa, as the mindmirror reverts the motion of information back to the territory it orders, we can consider that we are all born in an infinitesimal mind. Thus mind and membrane, form together the membrain, the intelligence of the Universe that orders the slower more extensive inner vital ‘temporal energy’ (preferred name for the inner region of the clock) of the ternary system. Minds, Seeds, creation, information, God as the maximal information point or singularity of the system, and many other terms are now entangled into ‘Dasein’…
BIOLOGIC SYSTEMS
Topological dimensions of information are always dimension of height and they are the dominant arrow of the organic Universe – locomotion being despite our obsession a mere instrument to the higher aim of the Universe, its absolute future: to perceive, gauge, evolve and reproduce. All biological and human social and technological systems also evolve according to the arrow of information increasing the height of its dimension of gauging information as the evolution of reptiles into birds or mammals into humans show. So in its 3rd age evolution grows information:
In the graph we can see how obvious is the arrow of heightinformation and the dominance in all scales of that arrow which completes with topological evolution the program of biology, long needed of a ‘directional nonpersonal’ creative topological arrow.
IT has then to be understood in pure philosophical terms the HUGE difference between what science is TODAY AND WHAT it is really when we complete its arrows of time adding information to the mix as an arrow of timefuture MORE important than mere locomotion, as people seem to just with an astouding simplicity and arrogance to discharge any temporal whys that cannot be measure as motion in space.
In present philosophy of science departing from physics, all what we have talked about is irrelevant as it has been reduced to nothing – reality they say with a very religious dogmatic view, is ONLY what we can measure without clocks and meters and we can describe with maths within a single time arrow defined by space motions, v=s/t. All other questions are NOT our concern and as we are the high popes of philosophy of science, we discharge it
When you ad information though YOU AD LANGUAGES, form, stillness, perception, singularities, intelligence, organicism, ALL THE ELEMENTS THEY DISCHARGE as they are not susceptible to locomotion, distance and measure as they happen inwards, in a point through formal evolution.
I confess I have never been able to break this ‘religious dogma’ which I found outrageously antiscientific and made me long ago to loose a lot of respect for physicists doubling as philosophers of science. The maxwellian demons ORDER reality, minds and languages DO EXIST, territorial order is the essence of existence and nothing can be solved beyond what we already know and the gathering of data and establishment of causal systems merely on statistic grounds if we do NOT acknowledge that human properties are common to all singularity systems that control a territorial organism they order. In the next graph we show that difference of point of views:
IN THE GRAPH, we see the essential difference when we add information: the mindsingularities that order reality around their center BECOME the ultimate why of all realities. Creation by replication, iteration, mirror image, reproduction of information become the meaning of it all. And so vital properties become embedded.
instead of monads, we use here a simple symbol for GOD, taken from Greek letter, for the Generator of time arrows, for the topologic combination of lines and cycles, which form a spatial ternary symmetry: x 0=Ø, and for the ∆infinite scales of its ‘plenum’ body of space, where fractal parts of it become super organisms, gods of existence. Many variations on the same theme, specially on the central ‘vowel’ can be used, º•Œø∞, as a mind, as an infinitesimal infinite as a super organism as a topology as an infinite dries of scales.
We highlight three components of all realities: Γ, the three ARROWS/ages of time that generate it ,Φ the three topologies of space across the three scales ∆, of its super organism.
it is god then just the program of creation of super organisms? And as such always a ratio a balance, a domain within the limits of ∆±i of the domain?
I think so. Thus in this manner ΓœΔ will bring the three elements, time generation, organic topology, scalar, fractal form.
As we are all super organisms made to the image and likeness of god.
We all have Γime ΦSpace & ∆scalar dimensions We are all gods, we are all super organisms. The existence thus of a Universal particle, or god’s particle, the suer organism, Œ=ΓΦΔ thus closes the third line between the mind and the whole, the first and final isomorphism that describe all beings as both dºst of spacetime and a Universal God, dust=dºst.
We shall close this third line on ‘the different functions of exi≈st¡ence§’ of the Universe with the study of the concept of God, as the whole of all wholeness – Logos≈Mind of the Universal body, in a platonic sense, as the absolute cano of the cave, of which all its fractal parts are made to its image and likeness – the point of absolute future, of the 5th dimension, of two imaginary time parts, singularity point of no reference, that does not exist ever in present, asymptotic to it:
Max. i
When we say that pure form does not exist, neither pure energy is because the game is never perfect except in the whole that never dies block of 5Dimensions where all the potential games are written.
God both in the Universe at large and the Human Wor(l)d, our SpaceTime domain of perception is the pure form of immortal logic time – the world cycle of all world cycles, which never ends as it repeats itself in simultaneity nonlocality, at every scale, composed of:
G, Γ, Gamma, the Generator equation that defines its actions
0, •, its fractal 0point, black hole Mind, Aristotelian still point of maximal density of information≈attraction of the Universe,
D, ∆, Delta its infinite scales.
Form in Space, Mind in time, Future in its infinite scales and hence in its distances – and yet purely as Plato envisioned a canon never to be reached except in the whole infinity itself
In the graph, the Absolute God of the Universe IS its mind of maximal information. Is that point conscious or impersonal? We can compare it with human Gods, the point of maximal information of a Human Superorgansim – its ‘self’ in the ∆ scale of individuals, a neuronal group of the brain; its prophets in the ∆+1 scale of societies; an informative master of the wor(l)d; its DNA in the ∆1 scale of biological cells. All those ‘human gods’, ‘create’ the future of its systems, organism, society or cell with its logic patterns of information.
So such are the concepts of a personal God, or brainmind with absolute control of the system that apply to a personal view of God and extrapolated to the Universe, gives the Black Hole, or gravitational brain of information as the God of the system, whose internal ‘chemical mind’ (Maldacena’s equations which show a black hole to have a 5D ‘homunculus’ representation of the 4D electromagnetic galaxy) controls the body of stars of its galactic plane, as the brain controls your cells.
But there is an impersonal Taoist concept of God as the game of existence and creation with the rules expressed in ¬Æ logic terms in this blog. For eastern religions, Ch’ang, God is the game of creation of yin and yang – the isomorphic laws of spacetime that all systems obey, including the ‘Godbrains’ of any scale of Organisms of the Universe.
And this God can be accessed by any part of the Universe made to its image and likeness, making you communicate and dissolve with the whole in a mystique experience I have lived now alone in this planet for 30 years and counting…
As we have studied in depth this impersonal god all over this web, we shall now concentrate a bit more in the personal God in the Human social scale of super organisms, which is the commonest concept of verbal god, humans better understand.
Personal God – Max. Tiƒ.
Perhaps the closest description of God is that of the mind of a territory of order, by a future fractal point that moves the territory in synchronous motions around its self.
For each discontinuous whole, god is it point of maximal information, or self with the will to order the super organism in which the point of knowledge is inscribed. It follows that god has more information than the point of knowledge, and as such there are degrees of god, regarding how high in the size of the god, we are talking on the scale of super organisms, from where we deduce that god is the logic mind of the Universe – in formal terms, the fractal generator:
Impersonal god = ∆±∞ ($t<∑e∏i>ð§)
which FOR THE SCALES OF DECAMETRIC infinity we perceive as human beings, is the scale of atomsgalaxies, which are the limits we perceive and the game of existence of its super organisms. In other words, the future is created by the Tiƒœ point of maximal information that is in the Universe, the relative quarkblack holes of each atomicgalactic system. But humans do not use the word ‘god’ in that sense, so we must explore what ‘god’ as a human semantic word means in our scale.
God in its commonest verbal expression means the most intelligent, informative point of the Universe. Yet as the Universe is a fractal of infinite selfsimilar TSymmetries of spacetime, God can be defined by a simple equation, as the relative point of future of a super organism or whole of wholes, common set of all sets of superorganisms of fractal points in a 5Dimensional Universe:
Personal God= Max. ð§
Now, the question that immediately must be addressed, is how we can prove the existence of singularity minds of information if we cannot see inside its mirrors, the software, which can only be seen in itself in the infinitesimal point that holds its image, non susceptible of direct visual analysis?
The answer is like with forces such as gravitation, invisible to us – through it effects.
So the immediate question is what is the effect of mindmirrors? To create life, will of survival, biological drives of existence, to reproduce and last, and gauge information and survive.
So the question of proving the infinite mirrors of the Universe, its monadminds comes to the question of proving the existence of a life program of survival in every point and territory of order around a mirror or still language of perception, born of the confluence of multiple sensational languages, to represent the dimensions of the Universe. As for example a human mind which as all point mirrors has 3 outlets of perception for the 3 direction dimensions (visual spatial occipital axis, dominant in white, brachycephalic, temporal, verbal axis dominant in mongoloid, and inner territory of order with its height inner emotional axis and the nose and mouth ‘land perceptive’ ones:
3 AXIS CREATE AN INFORMATION SPHERE, THE MAIN MIRROR MIND OF THE PARTICLEPOINTMONAD OF THE UNIVERSE.
The Œpoints: monads that order the Sentient Universe.
This first example of the complexity of the Universe, which many scientists, mostly physicists, have shunned off, obscuring a deeper knowledge of reality, hopefully prepares you to persevere in the understanding of the complex ambivalence of the Universe, simplified by the human mind, whose equation in the metric of the 5th dimension – one of the infinite varieties of Tƒ x Sp = ∆mind – we can now explain:
O@ (infinitesimal Œpoint or mind) x ∞ð (Universe perceived) = Œ (constant mapping of reality)
What a mind does is rather simple. The Universe out there has infinite time cycles that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cyclical motions. This is an ∞, which we cannot store inside us.
So we simplify all those motions into ‘forms’ perceived as extensions of space, Sp.
On the other hand the mind is a Tƒ, spherical system, with 2 different spheres: an external membrane with sensorial detectors, which ‘shrinks’ into a relative smaller point, the eye and then the brain, which transforms Sp, the infinite cycles made into spatial forms, and keeps shrinking them to an infinitesimal mapping of reality, a still image, very much as the way a camera reduces reality to a virtual shallow image in 2 dimensions.
And this can be done because of a property of spherical forms, called the Poincare Conjecture: you can shrink a topological sphere (any closed membrane, a skin, a planetary surface, is a sphere), as much as you want without deforming its information. So we find infinite minds in the Universe, ‘monads’ in Leibniz’s terms, which as he said ‘are points, which store a world in it selves’.
So we could also define the Universe as an infinity of ‘world’, fractal minds perceiving reality from those Œ points. What all those fractal minds do? Time cycles? Why. Because they keep perceiving and gauging information through them, and they keep absorbing ‘energy’ to move, and they keep reproducing their time cycles in parallel forms of spacetime, and they keep evolving with other points into larger systems of points, topological networks, which have organic nature.
The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they actreact accordingly.
We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’. Simple, because the mindsingularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its egocentered perspective.
In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACETIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.
Now, this theoretical minimum, which gives birth to the biggest r=evolution of maths since Riemann, ‘does away with Hilbert’; but to fully put the copenhagen interpretation to rest and complete the understanding of mathematics in experimental terms, we need as we have done with spatial geometry and topology, show how temporal algebra and its numbers, do also reflect reality, in an evolutionary process called the closure of numbers that again will follow the ternary, universal syntax of ‘REALITY’.
The particle point features heavily in Nuclear physics and it is still a ‘mess’. I like of all of them, the Delta Function, which is ∞ at 0, 0 on the infinite line and 1 in its integral. It is perhaps the best mathematical definition and for that reason, Dirac without understanding what it means – the emergence of a pointparticle as a 1element of a higher ∆+1 scale, made it the nonrigurous foundation of its beautiful quantum thoughts.
In the graph, as our mind is electronic, we feed on light energy and transform it into an informative mapping of the Universe, reduced to what light sees. Thus our space is light spacetime, with its 3 Euclidean coordinates, a fact that was first understood NOT by physicists but by impressionist artists, Leonardo, whose motto ‘saper vedere’, guided my inquire as a young artist on reality behind the languages that describe it, and then by the impressionists; and finally by Picasso, who departed from reality, affirming he painted thoughts, so he studied the ‘elements’ of the mind mapping, its entropic lines (cubist age) and its cyclical forms (female portraits).
This theoretical minimum however when fully evolved will give birth to the biggest r=evolution of maths since Riemann. As it ‘does away with Hilbert’. But to fully put Hilbert and its adon in physics, the Copenhagen interpretation to rest and complete the understanding of mathematics in experimental terms, we need to evolve further spatial geometry, topology, temporal algebra and its numbers, to reflect reality, more accurate; which we shall treat in the posts dedicated to maths in the second line, from its evolutionary process called the closure of numbers that again will follow the ternary, universal syntax of ‘REALITY’, to the study of the analytic geometry of its ternary elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic minds…
2ND DIMOTION
LOCOMOTION AND WAVES OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION
Of the 12 Kantian categories, Schopenhauer rejects 11 as redundant, and retains only causality. He then discusses the a priori nature of ðime, §pace and its causality (ab.∆), the 3 innate functions of all minds” (ab.•) .
Introduction to Schopenhauer “On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason’ (∆causality, •Mind, §pace & ðime)
“Call information entropy. Nobody knows what entropy really is, so you have the advantage.”
Neumann to Shannon on S.
DUALITY: HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE
The first and most important element of the Universe are its dimensions, described mathematically but whose conceptual meaning so far escapes science. We shall thus define first its two fundamental 0) logic=temporal elements 1) geometric=spatial and:
0) The duality of perception of dimensions, either as motion or as distance form (Galilean paradox), which we ust have explained
1) The bidimensional nature of all parts of the Universe (holographic principle); the next instalment in the architectonical building of reality departing from time cycles.
1.Holographic principle. Bidimensional ðime (information with motion) and entropy (§pace with motion)
‘Simplicity is genius’ ; ‘Saper vedere’. Leonardo on the topology of life and its harmonious forms
‘Coincidentia opositorum’ Cusa, on the fundamental dialectic dualist logic of the Universe, which constantly brings the opposite properties of ‘Lineal entropy’ and ‘closed information’ into Complementary Spaceðime energy beings.
In topological terms, there is lesser ambiguity:
Time clocks are always cyclical and related to information stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, as the circle or the sphere in three dimensions are the forms which store more form with less surface. On the other hand §pace is lineal, with less dimensional forms of information, and more extension in §pace, as the line is the shortest distance between two points a an b. A circle thus made of a simple rotating radius is a clock and traces a external membrane, which can be seen still as a whole or a point moving. It thus have a dimension more than its ‘spatial state’, moving between A and B. We shall call the ‘function of a point or line as a circle’, an informative function, and the function of a line as a pure motion in §pace an entropic function. In the graph, left, the simplest form in existence in the Universe, we can ‘perceive’ is a form with motion (all what you see is indeed forms with motions); a line limb/field of entropy, moving a head/particle of information.
And two logic immediate properties of the nature of those two elements combined or disjoined are:


 The inverse properties of spatial entropy and temporal information, its fundamental logic property. In graph, the inverse function between Spatial, entropic expansion and Temporal, informative Implosion has infinite manifestations and can be defined by a simple equation of inverted ‘hyperbolic’ nature: ð=1/S. As we defined cyclical ðime the inverse of Lineal Time , ƒ=1/t, it follows that physicists ‘Lineal Time ‘ is indeed lineal §pace with motion, hence the discovery latter on that Lineal Time is a dimension of §pace (Einstein).
 The fact that one can be transformed into the other, which is essential for the dynamic nature of the Universe. So we define a first simple ‘Generator equation’ of ðime§pace beings:

Γst. $pe (entropic §pace) < ≈ > ðiƒ (Temporal information)
If we ad the topological form (Lineal Space: $) an cyclical time: ð, as alternate synoptic symbols for spatial entropy and cyclical information.
And call the combinative state ðime§pace momentum, whose ‘integral’ (in physics, extended soon to all systems) is called Energy, the ‘third element’ of reality: Spentropy > StEnergy < Tinformation
Whereas the intuitive symbols of ‘expansion’ < and ‘implosion’ > indicate that TO TRANSFORM one into the other, through an intermediate ‘momentumenergy state’, entropy must shrink into information, Spe>Tiƒ or information must expand into entropy, Tiƒ<Spe.
We can now ad to this ternary ‘topological’ discovery, the ‘duality’ of motions vs. distancesforms, to fully define ðime, form, §pace, entropy, energy and information.
Trinity: E x I = STbeings of energy
‘From 1 (the yangline of entropy) comes 2 (the yin sphere of form), from 2 comes 3 (the yinyang energetic being), from 3 come the ∞ beings’ Cheng Tzu
We made a huge first statement – that entropy is expansive §pace and information is stored in ðime clocks, just ‘seen’ with different ‘quantity of motion’. Time is form in motion. Space is static entropy.
Yet to fully grasp the interaction of those 2 arrows, we need to explain another fundamental law of the Universe, which puzzles scientists for decades – the holographic Principle – that is, the fact that information is bidimensional, as in the ‘tall, flat screen or paper you are reading’.
THE HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE.
Consider only another bit of it on those equations of Einstein’s relativity, where time is ‘packed in all its dimensions’ as the present ∂t derivative of spacespeed. Physicists go merrily playing with its magic, and it ‘works’. But wait a second… only systems with the same dimension can compare and transform into each other.
So how 3 space dimensions and one time dimension work? The magic here is that the height dimension is the ‘static dimension’ of information related to time which stores in its cyclical clocks, in its frequency and form the information of the Universe. So a clock is ‘besides’ the flat plane of space’, a ‘tall form’. And so we NEED to give height as a dimension of time, then time is the bit/frequency of the cycle, and the flat surface of space – the flat Universe, the flat plane, is the form that moves lineally. So again we see how black holes are ‘tall’ IN THE CENTER OF A TIMELIKE accelerated clock vortex:
In the graph, we see reality both as fixed distances of space and as a series of discontinuous motions, and time. Thus reality is perceived either as a single lineal geometry or time duration. And inversely cyclical forms, as seen as circles or as cyclical clocks, with a frequency that determines its capacity to carry information, when it becomes fixed as ‘memorial space’.
Thus 2 x 2 dualities of O vs.  time motion vs. spatial form are the key paradoxes, which need to be resolved for each species to understand the game of spacetime:
Lineal Time, t, has the dimension of motion and in its cyclical ‘clocklike ðime, also the dimension of Height.
This seen as space give birth to lineal distances, $ whole clocks of ðime live a memorial trace of information, made of formal §pace.
Space has the dimension of length and the dimension of reproductive width:Information is defined as the maximal number of DIMENSIONAL FORMs=MOTIONs of an entity (Galileo’s paradox: motion indistinguishable of distance, due to the spacetime symmetry).
SYMMETRIES OF SPACETIME are then possible because only entities with the same dimensions can transform into each other. So now we have 4 different bidimensional entities, information (bidimensional form with motion), time, cyclical form with motion, space, bidimensional sheet with minimal form,and only energy, its spacetime combinations deploy in a single sheet of spacetime, 4 Dimensions.
The graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:
Once it is clear that there are different mathematical frames of reference, of different sizes; that mind reduce in scale reality – the Universe into worlds, and that dimension and motion are indistinguishable – absolute features of reality, which will be formalized soon with the proper understanding of the ‘undefined terms of mathematics’ (fractal points, lineal waves, and networks≈planes – we need to fully grasp the unit of the Universe, a ‘point with volume’, or fractal point, hence a time cycle.
The duality of time≈motion and space≈form, and its two varieties, continuous open decelerating speed≈distances and closed accelerating cycles≈circles of time, are both paradoxes of perception and objective, inverse arrows of motion.
We summarize the formal and functional differences between entropy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:
Maximal SpaceEntropy = Minimal Form=body Vs Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head
For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.
The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate information, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.
And yet in a paradoxical Universe, as it happens the increasing speed of the mindelements to conform a still mindmapping, suddenly become locked into that still linguistic view, as a hurricane stops in its zerocenter. So from motion to form, the Universe stops in a single timequanta.
Look back at the previous graph. What is the main difference between lineal and cyclical ðime? Obviously that cyclical ðime is bidimensional and it carries ‘form’, information both in its form and the frequency of its cycles. So the holographic principle becomes solved by accepting cyclical ðime.
Yet if ðime has the dimension of height to complete a circle, we must redefine the classic 4 dimensions of ðime§pace, as 2 dominant in Ðime§pace, height and length, which creates a bidimensional circle (to which ad the frequency of the cycle, or pure dimension of ðime), and those dominate in ðime§pace, which has now 2 dimensions, length and width.
And so because only beings with the same number of dimensions can transform into each other, we just have discovered an important conundrum of modern physics – how the Universe is built through the…
The Universe is made of two substances spatial entropy and informative ðime cycles/clocks. We can see it with motion as entropy and ðime or as fixed forms, as §pace and form. We can see it as a single reality, as §pace and ðime, or as a multiple quanta, as entropy≈expansive motion and imploding form.
The exact definitions of reality are thus in terms of two poles, absolute lineal §pace seen as distance and absolute form:
Pure Spacedistance (not perceivable) with motion (entropy) < Max. entropy§pace x Min. Form (energy) + Max. Form with Min. §paceentropy (Information) > Pure ðimeform (cyclical)
Since pure distance§pace (vacuum) has no form and it is not perceivable, and pure form (cyclical, inward clocks) do NOT communicate with us and cannot be perceived. So those two limits when combined gives us energy (dominant in motion but with form to be perceived) and information (dominant in form but with motion to be perceived).
This duality implies difficult choices of wording as onedimensional huminds reject ambiguity embedded in reality. We shall in principle consider the word ‘dimension’ for both ðime and §pace:
– All states of relative motion ‘ðime states’ or ‘ðime ages’. And call its study diachronic studies.
– All states of relative form ‘§pace topologies’ or ‘§pace organs’. And call its study synchronic studies.
And so conclude that ðime has three dimensions≈ages≈functions symmetric to the three dimensions≈forms of §pace.
Let us see how those three dimensions of ðime and three of §pace appear now, being aware it is impossible not to handle a certain ambiguity in the terminology dragged for millennia of misunderstanding those words; starting from the simple truth that from 1 ðime§pace comes two ðime and §pace, and from two comes three. So we start with two, focusing now in the ‘form of ðime cycles and planes of lineal §pace’.
Thus we can start studying beings of one dimension of space and one dimension of timemotion, simultaneously. As reality requires that for each dimension of space we perceive one of time. And beings with a basic typology of lines, limbs and potential fields, $, since the line is the shortest distance between points, with spherical ‘particleheads’ on top, made of many timespace ‘clockscycles’ of information; since the sphere stores maximal form in minimal space.
It allow us to construct bidimensional (minimal beings) mimic in all type of species, which go on constructing the reproductive equations of a bidimensional world of spacetime.
It is an astounding symmetry, which makes each lineal motion, potentially perceived as a line of distance, which it traces as a limb/field in motion.
It also means that to each topology in space, corresponds a function in time, and so we double the dimensions of reality, making a clear correspondence between the 3 topologies of space and the 3 functions in time of all beings:
In the graph we see those motions as pure topological forms and pure time motions, below, and above how they combine their function=form and ensemble into ternary systems of spacetime, with 3 space +3 time dimensions, which are the basic all pervading system of reality, with a formal singularitylike particle/head gauging information, a field/limb, spacelike formless lineal or planar surface of entropic motion that moves the bodyparticle and an intermediate, hyperbolic vital bodywave that iterates the system.
So the scalar structure of the Universe, and its three modes of timespace change are the 2 fundamental advances needed in philosophy of timechange to fully understand and resolve the pending questions of most sciences.
This ternary spacetime, form with motion system of 3s≈3t dimensions is the key structure unveiled by the seeming ‘innocent’ paradox of Galileo.
As physicists didn’t care that much for the logic behind relativity of motion, they didn’t find this basic insight of the duality of spatial forms and time motions, and so they got stuck with 3 dimensions of space, and one dimension of time only. And yet because the 3 different topological motions of time are real, they ensemble all beings of reality:
 Expansive entropy that disorders and erases information, simplifying system back to its ‘less evolved past’, and so we shall call pastentropy, which is flat or lineal as all fast moving ‘planes’, since those are the geometries with shorter=faster distances.
 Repetitive, hyperbolic bodywaves that seem not to change, and so we shall call relative present energy
 Implosive, spherical particleshead, as the sphere stores maximal information in less space, with accelerated timeclocks, which we shall call future, as they are the future logic systems that guide the whole and store the gauging paths of the whole system.
RECAP
St¡ence is ultimately concerned with the existence of beings. How they are generated, live and die, regardless of which are its particular nature – those are the foundational questions, which as Leibniz put it, must have answers related to its ultimate substances:
Those substances are the energy and information of the being, product of the combination of its motions and forms, which we call ‘spaceentropylineal motion’ and ‘timeformcyclical motion’; as form is also a motion, albeit cyclical and hence perceived without detail by a slow observer as cyclical form.
In nonabrahamic ‘tribal, historic religions’, where God is a preaxialrational age wor(l)d to signify the subconscious collective of a tribe, God was always considered the ‘form’ or ‘information’ that moulded as ‘logos’, the entropic lineal motions with no form, which where the first ‘existential manifestation of the being’.
To exist therefore it was required that from the immortal lineal motions and cyclical forms of the Universe, a ‘drop of yin’ felt into yang and vice versa. And this is the first moment of creation, when entropy, lineal motion acquires its first curvature of time; or when time, the first cyclical form, breaks its closed nature and emits a wave of communication that resembles its form.
3RD ÐIMOTION:
REPRODUCTIVE ENERGY
As all dimotions are entangled, we should notice first that locomotions are in fact reproductive motions as the system in the wave forms reproduce its information in adjacent parts.
The duality of space vs. time perception.
All this can be further explored now that we have some basic understanding of the dimensions of reality when we compare the ternary physical dimensions of time (entropic, decelerating motions, steady motions and accelerated motions) vs. those ternary dimensions in space (distance, line; area, vortex; volume, spatial growth).
In space, the dimensions seem to us in an easy hierarchical system of growth, 2D lines if we consider them waves of NonE fractal points with a 01 unit circle dimension for each point), 2D areas and 3 D volumes, but in time the 3 arrows depart from 1D steady state motion and can be considered as opposite directions, when volumes of space grow, through the scattering arrow of entropy diminishing its speed, vs. the acceleration of speed that diminishes space as the system collapses into a singularity:
So the 3D of classic space, ‘volume’ actually belongs to the entropic arrow of decelerating time that creates spacevolume, v. the opposite arrow of imploding time vortices that diminish space volume and increases speed, VxR=k
So what seems in space a natural growth of volume in space, in time has a different order:
Entropic ≈decelerating volume < steady state ≈ distancemotion > Informative, cyclical area ≈ accelerated motion.
This different ‘order’ of dimensions when perceived in simultaneous space and cyclical time is the main dislocation in the way the mind perceives both (which is sorely painful when we consider the order of a world cycle, always starting in the ∆1 scale of maximal information to decline as it grows and reproduces into less perfect, more entropic volumes of iterative forms that finally decline and die in the arrow of entropy; which the mind that has a SPATIALVOLUME INCLINED nature of evergrowth, does not understand).
13 Dimensions of present and 4th dimension of death in a single plane.
It is then when we enter into the ‘known dimensions’ used by ‘science’ – though without the mirror symmetry that makes us understand them as spatial forms vs. temporal motions.
In that single plane the being, which acquired its maximal perfection as form of information in its seedgeneticmemeticpropheticquantum particle state (biologic, sociologic, physical systems) will now try to evolve further into its ∆+1 social world. But there mostly will play a shorter game of existence (in a relative slower time speed) called life that ends in the fourth dimension, entropic death, as hardly any form of reality is able to keep ascending the scales of the fifth dimension.
So basically huminds fearing the fourth dimension (or loving it in the case of physicists whose worldly profession is to make entropic weapons, and hence have created multiple entropyonly theories of reality), consider only the 3 ages≈spatial dimensions of topological beings but without the proper analysis of its S=t symmetries do not fully grasp its two fundamental structures a super organism in simultaneous space made of lineal limbs/potentials < Øreproductive bodywaves>Oparticles heads, and its 3 ages of life, as the order in simultaneous space of those 3 systems is different from its wordlcycle order; as the reproductive bodywave is ‘between the lineal limbfields (1D) and its ‘coiling into a cyclical motion (2D particlehead).
It is then selfevident that the order of those 3 present dimensions, lineal motion, cyclical motion and wavelike motion is multiple giving birth to many different events and formal organisms. And from this realisation comes the big question about the 4D entropy and inverse 0D generational dimensions: can we invert their order?
So most systems have its maximal form in the seed o1 temporal state. Even if ALL minds WOULD LIKE THE order to be the opposite and grow always in information without death and entropy, which IS NOT what we observe in the real world.
main order in time is the world cycle, which unfortunately starts in the lower scale of faster time speed, which becomes ordered till emerging in the upper scale, but then is all going down, into the 4th dimension of death… So the arrow of entropy reigns in each of the scales alone, but the arrow of information BETWEEN SCALES IN THE 05 CYCLE, alpha and omega of all those existences.
Its study is the fundamental form of knowledge possible in the Universe. But we say all time motions have a spatial symmetric form. What is the symmetric form in space of the world cycle of time? The super organism, the fundamental simultaneous form of reality. Below we show that symmetry for a human being.
How much depth is acquired when we have the whole set of 5D to study the different realities can be shown indeed in the next graph, where the simplified view of a human being a a circlehead, wavebody and linelimbs now acquires a much detailed analysis:
In the graph, the human being in simultaneous space is:
 “A topological set of 3 adjacent noneuclidean, fractal physiological networks, connected to organs with $entropicdigestive, movinglimbic, ðinformativesensorial, mental and STreproductiveblood functions.
 ∆±1: All of them made of ∆1 ‘biological fractal points=cells’ connected in social groups by those ternary networks that create a T.œ, a Timespace super organism, the fundamental particle of the Universe.
This definition of a man, the reader should not be surprised, uses exactly the same terminology we use to describe any timespace organism of the Universe, from the atom to the galaxy. Because we are all made of the same elements and its laws. We have used a mixture of geometric and biologic terms, from mathematical and verbal languages, to describe it.
But we do NEED a new formalism to put together those ‘Dimensional isomorphic=equal’ properties, and that is the origin of the Disomorphic method or organic method of understanding used in this blog to put in correspondence all systems of reality illustrated in the lower ‘logic equation’, which describes those physiological networks by its ‘spacetime functions.
Of those laws the most important by far is the ‘symmetry’ between simultaneous space view and temporal moving view – the essence of the duality of the Galilean paradox. All what we see mentally in simultaneous space is actually moving in time.
And that means that any super organism in space will be tracing a world cycle in time, of life and death, a zerosum cycle between birth and extinction.
In the right we show how such systems evolve in time, through 3 ages dominated by each of those networks, the young limbic age, the reproductive classic age and the old informative age that ends in deathdissolution.
And we have illustrated them with ‘artistic images’ of the 3 ages of the next ∆+1 scale, the slower timespan of a civilisation, the greek Iron age, with its epic, lineal kuroi art, mature classic balanced age and informative hellenistic angst age, before war killed the civilisation.
And below we have used the simplest symbols of 5D logic to show those flows of time, which we repeat again:
< is the intuitive symbol of entropic, relative past devolving expansion
≈ of present relative balanced motion
> of informative implosion into a more evolved tighter network with faster time cycles.
The problem of death.
NOW I AM NOT going to lie to you. The problem of those dimensions from a philosophical pov, is that they go in decline, after a first impetu, when the being emerges from a lower ∆1 scale of seed, particle, plasma, DNA or prophetic state (different povs on ‘languages’ of creation, the 5Dimension of reality), it all goes down in existence, till the entropic, red dead, even for light born in the blue range of giant stars, at high frequency, going down, expanding its space, dying in red between galaxies…
So deal with it, your best times from the perspective of information, and creative reproduction were before you were born, written in the genetic scale.
Can you deal with it? If it is an emotional problem I won’t help you. Go to church. We shall also deal with seminal prophets, the 5th dimension of mindinformation of a religious subconscious collective mind of civilisations and prove you Christ is god, mathematically but he is not saving you, individual but mankind the species, for the time being, enough to state that you will die and your ego does not exist.
Then we can talk. As the seed emerges from the linguistic, creative fifth dimension of its genes, memes, quantum numbers, colours or whatever ‘form’ it acquires in its world cycle of ‘exist¡ence,’ as an entity of energy x information of a given stience scale of reality, it perceives in its mirror language, and moves.
It does create the second dimension of motion, the young age…
So we can write the 3 ages of life in a simple stream of <≈> flows of actions, young motions, reproductive processes and informative old behaviour that reflect the 3 ages.
To notice then we use as symbols of those 3 ages the symmetric ‘inversions’ of the symbols for Space>Past, Temporal information> Future time, and timespace>PreSenT.
Now, we ‘are talking’, pedantic T.œ Science, so early because i know memorial scholar and students of memorial scholarship have a huge ego and need to feel things are complicated, don’t like the dictum of Einstein ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’ and think of course if they can write hermitian matrix with operators, in quantum algebra they must really now what is all about (: Lol. You are children of thought…
Because you depart from false principles, so you have built a bizarre, baroque, complicated and convoluted image of reality which has shaky foundations, filled with errors, reason why despite so much complexity in the details, when it comes to first principles, with lineal single entropic arrow of times you can only ‘think’ the Universe was born in a bigbang explosion of an infinite dense point, who nobody knows what was doing there, how and why.
This simplicity in the understanding of timespace arrows is then what we need to correct first. Because as it happens with Abrahamic religions, never mind your IQ if you start with a brainwashed by Torah and Koranical mantras, you will only utter nonsenses when talking of the first principles.
On the other hand when you start without error, on the real substances of reality, real space and real time (‘real’ yes must be repeated many time so you get it – languages are distorted mirrors of the mind and experimental facts come first, ‘reality is GOD’ – the mind only its mirror), you can progress very fast to the whys, to the big picture of the forest. And then also if you wish so you can go by iteration, repetition and recombination, modulation, variation, of those elements explain each detail of each tree.
So as you see departing from something so simple as the 5Dimensions of scalar spacetime, we are able to explain you just in our 5th page, the entire meaning of your existence as a timespace being, both as an individual and as part of a larger, slower organism, which lives as all civilisations tabulated in our historic study, 10 x 80 years, that is 10 slower generations, and inversely an insect of the lower scale lives ad maximal 8 years (antqueen), but calculates 10 times faster….
So with more complexity, both in its spatial formal and temporal motion symmetry, suddenly an astounding number of ignored results in all sciences will keep cropping, as we are going to show you that ALL can be known and explain within the limits of our mindmirror languages put on focus with the proper philosophy of ‘stience’ as the Universe is indeed made of spacetime organisms, seen as motions of the 5 Dimensions of time.
The third duality of the Galilean paradox: biased perception of those scales.
Accelerated time clocks in smaller scales are perceived as hyperbolic space ‘curvatures’ by the slower human mind’s space
The point then is measured externally by its angular momentum or mass, or external perception of its t/s density, which then as it moves with a speed s/t give us its force as a single Unit with 3 D, s/t x t/s =1.
It must be noticed the main error of classic physics – to consider the first dimension that of the line of distance, ignoring the emergence of a fractal point with inner dimensions, a seed of information, from the ∆+1 plane.
REDUCTIONISM AND PARALOGIC thought in creationist verbal theories.
We shall also evolve and complete and regain verbal thought as a meaningful language mirror of reality. On one side by applying topological linguistics to the findings of Humboldt (cultures reflected in the syntax of languages) and establish the ∆st basis of ternary universal grammar, reflection of reality.
So with verbal languages its ternary syntax is immediate:
5D: Name (subject: Knot of form: point) < 123D: verb: iterative action > 4D: Entropic object.
So the 3 verbs, pastpresent and future, between the mindsubject (5D0 and the entropic object it uses through the verb action define the 5 Dimensional isomorphisms of the languagemirror of logic thought that will therefore describe super organisms in 5D worldcycles s
The problem of course of creationist theories is that they exclude all other languages and all other properties which are NOT easily explained with a limited mind mirror – and all mind languages are limited because they CANNOT fit otherwise without ‘reducing dimensions’ the whole and its motions into an infinitesimal mind.
Further on as Kant realized, minds are synoptic and search always for an ultimate mirror image of the whole – the word God in religion, the final equation or God’s bigbang particle in mathematical physics – or the ego in the selfie, isolated humans of the present entropic age of history:
All this said we must conclude that a single spacetime continuum and its ‘naive realism’ – the philosophy of science of physics – is just mathematical reductionism… what we see is what it is, but only if its properties can be reduced to mathematical equations, which exclude obviously all other vital, artistic, sensorial languages and the properties they describe.
Further on, as digital though is the language we use to translate measures with machines, which speak that language better than we, verbal beings – it has caused a growing despise of life and worship of machines, the idology of today, our new religion.
Yet this philosophy is both a limited maya of the mechanical mindsenses, and an egotrip of the first scientists like Kepler, who said ‘God was a clocker that waited 500o years to find an intelligence like his’…
Such view completely DISREGARDS, the obvious first substances of reality we see experimentally, time clocks and vital spaces, broken by the membranes that divide and evolve those vital spaces into timespace organisms. It might please the simpleton mind, which reduces all what he sees, as the first men though the valley and tribe inhabiting its sacred land were God and all what existed.
But if you want to make serious science you must expand that view, first to understand its substances (or do you see numbers around when putting a microscope on space); and then due to the obvious experimental scalar nature of reality, understand the interaction between scales of parts and wholes that make it all organic.
This of course can only be made with the synoptic mindmirrors of man, logic time, and its verbal and mathematical languages, we shall evolve in this blog to better focus the reality of space and time. But always being conscious that no language gives us all the properties of spacetime, which we must ‘explore a priori’ trying to find its logic, which as Augustine put it is ‘of a higher order than man’.
‘God is the seer of time he said’,hence time was above God, and his logic was above man’s aristotelian lineal thought – which is truth, so we shall explore the logic of a Universe built with 5 timespace dimensions, its logic and interactions first.
Now, the graphs illustrate those dimensions in terms of geometry, the spatial dominant form of mental human languages which observe space and we will upgrade as nobody has done since… Lobachevski (: but with the perspective that mathematics while being the most efficient mind mirror of the properties of spacetime, is NOT the substance of the Universe, and so only by properly chaining our philosophy of science from the present platonism, or the equivalent creationism of religions to the Leibnizian concept of a relational spacetime Universe, of which we are all made, we shall make sense of it.
This said, mathematics will still be considered the best mirror to study the dimensions of spacetime, and its algebraic symmetries, group varieties, and analytical motions… Where operations will be the fundamental element to express those motions and symmetries.
Regarding the mirror languages that express those dimensions, as the most useful is mathematics – NOT the substance of reality, which is space and time, but its best mirror, the 5 mathematical operations that define most often those dimensions are as follows:
1D and 2 D  and O lineal and cyclical bidimensional spacetimes are ‘SUMS of NUMBERS’, each one a social being, most likely in its perfect form prime polygons, which become indistinguishable cyclical points, with its capacity to reproduce internally vertex:
Prime polygons able to multiply internally, invaginating the vital space till creating a mirror image, the mindsingularity in its center, are the most indistinguishable groups of points, the geometric equivalent to sequential, temporal numbers. As all other numbers can be a product of primes – the most efficient social configurations, the best mirrorimage of the social growth of ‘lineal and cyclical points’ are numbers and its social sums.
3rdD: REproductION. As the hidden wisdom of the verbal language understands the Product is the essential algebraic operation of the second §‡ dimension of iterative O x  = Ø combinations of the being.
4D: Entropy, Derivatives which divide a whole till finding its ‘finitesimal indivisible quanta’ are the natural operation of ‘Space’ in the fourth dimension as it finds that minimal ∆1 form. On the other hand, contrary to belief, polynomials, power laws ARE the time operation of decay and death of inverse exponential growth – as exponential growth do not exist since the energy to feed reproduction is limited but departing from a huge number of ∆1 wholes it is quite easy to produce a massive decay, reason why negative exponentials are used in all decay functions.
5D: social evolution. It follows that the exact inverse operations of 4D will be those of the 5th dimension of social growth: integrals in space of ∆1 quanta, and logarithmic FUNCTIONs in time, which are used for logistic equations of growth.
So we have found as we shall constantly do a Disomorphic (Dimensional isomorphism=equality) correspondence that carries the 5 Dimensions into the 5 mirror algebraic operations and its inverse (operandi in Latin also used as a synonymous in our attempt to create a slightly different jargon for common terms of ‘science’ when doing ‘stience’).
Thus we can reduce the mathematical language operations, its knots and bolts to the 5 Dimensions of reality:
The generator equation.
So WE write the Generator Equation, a symbolic equation that represented all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time and its spacetime combinations, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:
Γ. Generator: Toroid $p(limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ∑∏(exi) (repetitive wavesbodies) > Spherical ðƒ (head Particles)
Since limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.
Or as ChengTzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yangline of energy and the yininformation, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.
(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)
So I could classify all the different spacetime beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator.
Since Nature ‘pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous, spatial organisms:
It is clear that Informative Time, It, is far more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.
Those cyclical ðƒparticles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information.
It does not matter so much that forms become ever more complex, as topological knots become convoluted, but the functions of those networks remain. They become the 3 ‘physiological networks of all systems’, again described by the Generator equation:
$p; Digestiveenergetic network of NonAE points < ∑∏: reproductive, ‘blood’ networks > Informative, nervous networks: ðƒ
So now with those basic clarifications we can study through its 10 isomorphisms some of the key elements of those physical systems in 5D spacetime.
immortal Universe: a zero sum that conserves its Se<≈>ðƒ elements. Entropy (S∂)<cc:Energy>Mass (ðiƒ)
Now, the easiest way to consider each of the 3
Finally two important facts to notice on those 5D spacetime generator equations, to end this introduction:
As 5D and time are symmetries that increase information and decrease entropy contrary to belief the universe does warp energy into form and so it dies, since 2 symmetries (time cycles and 5D evolution) increase form, and only one (space motions) decrease it.
An example is the duration of life and death:
While the lifeinformationevolution arrow lasts its maximal timespace quanta warping the being in a point of space for ‘very long’, the arrow of death
entropy last a single quantum of timespace, exploding in that ‘microtime’ the entity in maximal space (i.e. bigbang microtime, antiparticle erasing.)
Yet the sum of both: ∑ ‘Max. T. x Min. S’ + ‘Max. S x Min. T’ is a zero sum for the total 5D spacetime of the Universe.
So the Universe is conserved, BECAUSE DEATH erases both 5D Times – the worldcycle of information AND the social evolution of the being.
Further on since the Universe is made of formal motions it is immortal and motion never ceases – only reverses its arrow from information to entropy in the act of death (or vice versa as Mehaute proved in chemical processes, in the creation of crystals) the Universe is immortal. From this fact it comes both the Absolute relativity of spacetime in each scale, which merely inverts its arrows and the relative infinity of motions in the 5^{th} dimension, which merely ‘wobble’ up an down. And from this absolute relativity derives the isotropy and isomorphism of both, from where it derives in the conservation principles of Physics:
Conservation of lineal momentum and kinetic energy vs. Conservation Tƒ: angular momentum and potential energy, which in most events of physical measure derives in the laws of least action (Hamiltonian ≈ Lagrangian > ∂H=0; steady points etc.
Γ. The Generator of physical systems and its 5D ST (anti)symmetries:
The Generator of Universal Planes, Time states and Space symmetries for all physical systems is a simple equation that resumes the spatial parts, temporal ages and coexisting 3 scales in which physical systems develop its cyclical spacetime action – the events and motions in space, physicists study:
∆≤3:t$ (young, toroid gas, field)≤≥∏∑(present, iterative, liquid, boson wave)≤≥ð§(future, informative crystal/fermion)
The fundamental ‘Generator equation’ leads to the first differentiation of physical spacetime systems in 3 5D planes according to the ternary principle:
 ∆_{1 }Electromagnetic, quantum plane: $tfield<∑∏wave<ð§particle; whose ternary asymmetry in space creates the atom.
 ∆Thermodynamic plane: $tgas<∑e∏iliquid>ð§crystal; whose ternary asymmetry in space create geological planets.
 ∆+1 Gravitational, cosmological plane of the galaxy: $t (strangelet halo); ∑∏(udquark stars), and §ð (top quark black holes), whose ternary antisymmetry in space creates the 3 galactic regions.
 Thus the most important ‘5D symmetry’ is the social growth of mass in 3 families of particles, the parts of galactic wholes (the 3 families of cosmic bodies); of which there growing but not definitive evidence despite thetheoretical soundness of the model, studied in the previous Post (Galaxies).
Those 3 ternary differentiations of the 3 Q1>T>G+1 scales of matter (fieldwavesparticles; gasliquidsolid; ud, strangelet, top quark hole regions of the galaxy) harmonizes the Universe.
The detailed analysis through the 10 isomorphisms 5 D fractal spacetime cycles generate, of each of the parts of those equations 3 $t<>∑∏≤>ð§ regions/ ages/planes of 5D physical systems truly resolves the whys and gives an architectonic perfect structure to the science of physics.
The 3 forms of space and the 3 motions of time.
So we can write a general equation, which is another ‘point of view’ on the ternary symmetry of the Universe, this time in terms of physical states of matter, for the ‘smallest quantum world’ and the ‘larger’ thermodynamic world of matter:
$t (gas, field spatial decelerating state) < ∑∏ (waveliquid steady spacetime) > ð§ (ParticleSolid, accelerated state).
And yet, most people will consider that a gas moves faster than a particle. Yes, indeed, externally, but we are talking here of the internal world of the particle, its vortex, its ‘hurricane’ of forces that creates it. Because the mind ‘fixes cyclical vortices’ of forces, masses and charges into a ‘form’. So we seem solid a very fast turning wheel, but it is made of turning spooks.
So the ambivalences of reality ARE ambivalences between the mind perception of form and the moving realities behind them. All the pictures we have of masses and charges so vortices of accelerated motion, and this was expressed by Einstein in his illunderstood Principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and masses and accelerated motions. Soon of course physicists who have this astounding capacity to define correctly with mathematical equations reality and then misunderstand it conceptually forgot what Einstein said and got back to their ‘lineal particle’ mantra as the cause of mass (but of course will not with the exception of Einstein, inspired by Mach, always fond of philosophy, ‘ask’, us philosophers of science.)
So there is here a contradiction: a time vortex because occupies little space, when not seen in detail seems a fixed form. Yet it is faster and its function, because it is faster is to enclose and tighten as a membrane the vital space of lineal entropic motions that want to escape, ‘collaborating’ with the ⊗point mind at the center.
And this is the organic structure between the faster membrane and the central point of view that are in fact the ‘same being’, exploiting the entropic motions of its environment or territory. A shepherd does have a shepherd dog, which constantly moves faster than the sheep, the vital space they enclose. The dog is the time cycle, surrounding the vital sheep entropic energy, which the shepherd directs.
Now it is clear the difference between 5D astrophysics and the present state of ‘fantaphysics’, in which all can happen, all particles that are a mere mathematical equation must be searched for, as there are no rules, no understanding of the spacetime symmetries of the Universe, and its lifedeath arrows. Physicists ARE STILL ASKING, why there are antiparticles (the arrow of death of particles), why there are 3 families of mass (the ternary symmetry of 5D scales of particles), what is dark matter in the halo (the strange quark symmetry between particles and parts of the galaxy).
They do not have the slightest idea of why the universe is like it is, and so all ‘goes’, all can be searched for, including unfortunately nuclear experiments with strange quark matter and top stars (black holes) that can blow up the planet and accelerate its future purpose on the ∆+1 scale – to feed as mitochondria do on a cell, the reproduction of the heavier strange and top quark matter that rules through black holes and strange neutron stars the galaxy.
Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy.
A galaxy is a curved, fractal spacetime of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial Entropy and temporal information).
And to understand it, we NEED to fully grasp the symmetry between the 3 ∆±1 planes of existence of the physical system.
The generator equation and its ‘expressions’ of time travels.
So we can deduce easily from the Generator Equation the equation of the life ages, or ‘world cycle’, the fundamental cycle of the Universe, the alpha and Omega:
 œ1 (conception: 5th dimension of reproduction and social evolution) ∆º: Max. $t (energy, young age) > $t=§ð (Adulthoodreproductive age)> Max. ð§ (old, informative 3rd age) << ∆2 (4th dimension of entropic age death)
The equation is another fundamental symmetry, from where an enormous number of facts of reality can be deduced.
A brief list of those ‘symmetries’ for physical, biological and social systems, starting by the Human world, which should be the center of any unification theory, based in the organic structure of the Universe, as man is the most perfect and better observed organism, and scales are all isomorphic so their size or location does not matter as physicists who pretend that the largest or smallest scales matter more than the human one, make us believe – on the contrary as their observation is scanty by reason of distance in time and space, they are plagued with interpretative errors.
∆±¡: 4th and 5th dimensions:
Time§paœrganisms: ¡ts ωorldcycles
∆û$ð you are, ∆•st you shall become.’ Bible, on the ωorldcycle of ∃xi…st¡ence
All this said, the essence of the Universe is the SYMMETRY between space forms and time dimensions, expressed in the world cycle of existence, where the 5 Dimensions of the being seen in simultaneity form a super organism and seen in sequential time form a world cycle.
So we come to the fundamental element of reality, the fundamental particle, the super organism, œ, travelling through a life and death ‘worldcycle’ of existence, which is a travel through the fifth dimension that ends invariably in entropic death – but through the reproduction of the T.œ ensures the immortality of its ilogic form.
A reproductive universe of super organisms tracing worldcycles.
The knot of all knot of times cycles is the supœrganism, and the cycle of all cycles the world cycle, so all what we see is a game of supœrganisms and worldcycles: Universe ≈ ∑ð.œ (worldcycles of superganisms). And so we state:
‘The Universe is a fractal supœrganism that re≈produces and d=evolves in/form/ation’
Now the most important of those actions are the reproductive actions of information, which ensure the survival of the logic form beyond its demise. This is an automatic fact; systems that do not reproduce its form, its information, don’t last in time and don’t exist. So all systems have sequential worldcycles of discontinuous reproduction into similar beings.
It is also the mathematical definition of a fractal: a fractal has a generator equation that reproduces the system. We are merely studying the fractal generator of the Universe.
Systems are fractals, which as the Universe does, constantly reproduce information and they do so by traveling from a seminal to an organic scale of being. This travel is reproductive, and so all what we observe are waves of reproductive, seminal supœrganisms, performing a world cycle:
In the graph the obnoxious •singularities dedicated to reproduce actions that become formal motions iterated through the imprinting of ∆1 seeds of exi•st¡ence. Constant waves of form crossing scales of the fifth dimension up and down in reproductive cycles, with astounding fidelity replicate per in secula seculorum the ‘elements’ of a game, which is infinite in time and space and identical repetitions of the limited number of ‘selfs’.
And now, only now when everybody has long ago abandoned the web, because they expect reality to mold to the designs of humind membrains, with its minimalist notion of reality and its properties, which only can be expressed in maths, etc. etc. we shall deal with the great question, what is God, and the UNIVERSE.
MERELY AS THE GRAPH SHOWS, A REPRODUCTIVE FRACTAL, a constant orgasm of reproduction, a super organism, that is the purpose of it all.
It must be understood that the order of a world cycle of existence differs slightly from our classification of dimensions for the whole scenario, as the particlehead becomes in biological organisms dominant and could be in that sense considered the 3D element which guides the present 1D limbs/potentials and 3Dreproductive age, which is the middle on a world cycle. This fundamental difference which must be clarified requires also a thorough change of ‘naming’ in this blog, which I will carry on distinguish the Dimensions of time as ‘AGES’ to signify this difference. Thus in sequential ages, the mind/head particle plays the key role in the 3rd informative age, even if it is formed from birth as the 2nd topological dimension of the being (as the foetus does follow the general order and creates last the reproductive organs, mixture of the informative and limbic, moving elements of the being).
So the 2nd dimension of simultaneous angular momentum or particlehead of a present being dominates the 3rd age of the being prior to its entropic death. (And in some graphs and texts are wrongly qualified as 3rd ðage).
Travels through the fifth dimension.
For a dimension of spacetime to exist, an entity must be able to travel through it, while its spacetime parameters remains coinvariant.
In words of Klein, one of the discoverers of NonE Geometry:
‘A Geometry is the study of the (co)invariant properties of a space(time), under motions within itself’ (Klein).
Since it is precisely the coinvariance of both parameters what allows ‘species’ to travel through those scales and exchange energy and information through them without the system and the dimensions to ‘become unstable’.
So how we travel through the 5th dimension? Simply moving through it in the lifedeath cycle of existence:
Let us then define with those simple principles of existential beings its most important equation… the…
5≈3±1 ages of ðime§paœs
‘To be or not to be, that is the question’ Shakespeare, on the function of ðime§pace existence.
“For you are ∆ºst (of ðime§pace). And to ∇ûst you shall return.” Genesis, on the world cycle of ðime§pace existence.
‘ΓºΔ is the seer of ðime’ Saint Augustine; on the program of ðime§pace existence.
‘ðime§pace Energy is conserved in all zerosum ωorldcycles between birth and extinction in which a ðime§pace being transforms back and forth its entropy into information: Eω≈∫exi=st‘. Principle of Conservation of the 3 arrows of ðime§pace. Function of exi=st¡ence.
Sancho on the ωorldcycle of all ∆ºST beings
We can now switch analysis from the spatial, synchronous view of ðime§pace cycles/arrows as organic parts of systems, into the temporal, sequential order, as ðimeages of a world cycle of existence.
It must be noticed that humans tend to confuse (and so the error translates in many pages of our blogs, from an earlier age in which I tried to explain a simplified model of the world cycle):
Spatial Entropy (ab. $pe), pure disordered motion that expands §pace and dissolves form, and energy, when that motion starts to acquire form – so the equation of energy is a vector with a clear define direction in its motion, given by the form that moves.
Pure cyclical ðimelike form (third image) with information, which is forminaction, the intermediate state in which form acquires some motion to be transferred.
So, the worldcycle’s equation is as follows:
∆1: birth as a seed of pure form in a lower scale>which emerges in the new scales in a youth of entropic motions, which soon starts to learn how to ‘form’ entropy into energy growth > maturity when energy becomes shaped into information and the system reproduces > old age when information dominates till the system becomes still> entropy age or age of death, when the system returns to the ∆1 scale.
In the next graph, the Universe is a fractal of 3 topological motions of ðime§pace; Entropy, information and its combined momentums, which integrate into a closed, zero sum energetic worldcycle. Thus the study of the world cycles of ðime§pace and its 3 motions encodes the meaning of all ‘exi=st¡ences’ acronym for the fundamental equation or ‘generator of fractal ðime§pace, e x i = st, which each ‘stience’, studies by studying the ðime§pace beings of a certain scale of size of the fractal Universe:
Amazing as it seems the Universe as only 3 topological varieties, which therefore correspond to the previous 3 forms. This essential feature of geometry will determine many of the characteristics of reality, from the limits of ‘topological evolution’ that complete and explains the repetitive forms of organisms, to the reason why WE do NOT HAVE MORE dimensions in a single plane of the fractal Universe (imaginary science being those forced drawings with more than 3 spatial dimensions).
In the graph, using the minimum symbols of ∆@S≈T, < for a flow of entropy, > for a flow of information, ST for a present momentum, ∆, for the different scales of existence of the Universe, we map out its fundamental world cycles. The understanding of those world cycles, event in ðime, of a synchronous networks of clone beings or super organism in §pace, is the fundamental task of GST, the organic model of the fractal Universe.
The interesting fact of those worldcycles is that they are again the product of a sequential order of the 5 Dimensions, IN THIS CASE IN INVERSE FASHION, a fact we shall study with its deep philosophical implications in more detail.
∆generation (5D:SOCIAL Evolution FROM SEED to emergent form of present>lineal youth (1D)>reproductive maturity (2D)>informative 3rd age (3D)>entropic death back to the past (4D).
THOSE ARE THE 5 MOTIONSdimensionsarrows of timespace, now forming the lifedeath cycle of existence of all beings. Thus, without them and all its possible symmetric relationships, that allow us to extract all its meanings together we cannot make sense of any system,including physical systems, today observed mostly with a single one, ENTROPIC locomotions and its worldlines.
In that regard all physical and biological systems, ‘live and die’ as super organisms made of ∑atoms/cells that evolve through networks that transform Entropy into information (Life arrow) and then explode those information networks back into disconnected Entropy when they have exhausted it (death arrow) determines a sequential, existential lifedeath cycle invariant in all beings:
– ∆1>∆º: 01 Dimension: Generation: Birth as a seed of information that evolves through a phetus that feeds on energy, reproduces and finally emerges, realizing a first full trip through scales of the fifth dimension between its cellular/atomic/prophet and organic/crystal/cultural ‘whole’ emerging state.
Max. Motion x Min.Information: 2D youth of external, LINEAL motions with maximal activity of its SpLimbs/potential fields.
3D: Sp=ðƒ: Balanced, ‘classic’ age dominated by reproductive/communicative systems: hyperbolical waves and bodies.
The presentpresent, or steady state in the continuum is the longest, more efficient state and can be defined mathematically simply as Max. $p x ðƒ > S=T, since both equations are related, as 4×4>5×2>6×1, the point of balance between Entropy and information is thus the maximal point of the equation of existence, the mature, re=productive age when the species reproduces its Entropy and information fully in other zone of §pace and ðime.
It is the desirable age to ‘stay for ever’ the immortal top predator point of the wave of existence of any species or individual or universal, Consider the classic definition of beauty in art, as a balance of forms, and indeed, we see the harmony and proportionality between form and size, the key dimensions of lineal and cyclical space, is the definition of classic beauty. And we will return to that, when observing that all forms of art can be reduced to 3, lineal, epic, energetic art, classic art, and baroque, informative, with an excess of form.
3rd informative age/1ST Dimension. As time passes and the present evolves into the future information dominates, energy exhausts itself, motion stiffens and the being looses its ‘time mobility’, becoming formal, wrinkled, warped, till all motion seems to cease, but as motion NEVER ceases only in the virtual mind… it changes finally direction and abandons the present to dissolve in the relative past (a choice of our informative mind we by convention choose here as the future).
It will be the 4th Dimension, the age of entropy.
Now, in the larger analysis the ages of existence are obviously more as we have to count its two limits, the seminal age, ∆1>∆º and the death and dissolution, its inverse ∆º>∆1.
So we consider 5 AGES, common to all beings of Nature, in the 5th isomorphism common to all ‘exi=st¡ences’
Further on there is ‘§ixth’ unique age, very rare for those unique lives that REPEAT the process of creation of larger new scale of reality, i.e. prophets of social memes and religions, species who evolve into supœrganisms instead of being extinct; which ultimately explains why the Universe does have ∞ new scales of social organization.
As certain ‘perfect players of the game’, achieve not the ∆º<<∆1 entropic death but a new ‘life’ in the ∆+1 scale, as the singularity mindmirror of information, the particlepoint ’emerges as the seed of the ∆+1 social scale’ instead of dying (prophetic thought, which creates a civilisation; black hole formation as the mindventer of a galactic, ∆+1 scale for stars, etc.)
So, while we shall escape the miraculous emergence of a being after death into a higher social scale, in the third line, for the sake of comprehension we study 5 aging states: seed>youth>maturity>old age< extinction, to fully close a worldcycle.
Of those existential cycles, physicists consider that entropy objectively is the future as they see the organism of the Universe expanding, perhaps in a process of death as it was likely born of a seed of pure information that exploded into a reproductive radiation of ‘gala cells’ galaxies…
In the graph matter’s death by entropy: e=mcc happen in all scales. An interesting argument is to consider in which scale happens the bigbang, a local entropic background radiation measured locally for the galaxy, likely remnant of a quasar state. So ∆st favours after carefully studying data, that each galaxyatom or gala cell – perspectives comparing it with other scales of similar spacetime; has its bigbang cycle and the size of the wholeness of those galacells is not known, as we explain in our articles on cosmos and galaxies… so the hyperbolic ego of man has also reduced the size of the Universe and properly written its theory to look like he knows it all…
In any case whatever scale is the dark entropy underlying the galaxy at cosmic level, physical organisms and its 3 arrows of:
Entropy ≤c²(St)≥M(t) which form a physical system and can be broken in death, follow also the ternary ages of life.
So the creation of matter from plasma emerging s a whole also precedes its death in a birth of matter, which evolved socially the material system, and will at some time reproduce similar cycles of formation of matter. So while there is no end to the game of replications, the ego dies, and on top despite seeing timeinformation as the future, the mind is somehow orientated in inverse form to the entropy decadence and expansion of the body from youth to old age.
4TH & 5TH INVERSE DIMOTIONS:
ENTROPY AND INFORMATION
The 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions can be defined both in space and time, as all other dimensions can be.
The 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions in space.
Then there is the 4th and the 5th dimension of time, past and future. And while this might seem trivial, it is the beginning of a true r=evolution on our understanding of it.
In space the 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions refer to the fractal scales from the infinitely small to the infinitely large, where the human scale will be considered the border between both, for reasons that will become clear when we define them in time.
And the main properties of those scales, each of them a discontinuous spacetime in itself, are the selfsimilarities and invariances of form that happen between them and give origin to its absolute relativity.
Since we shall find the same topological forms when we ‘evolve’ from one scale to another.
Yet since form is function, we will find also the same functions in each scale. For example, in all scales we will find clocklike cyclical forms that pack information, from informative particles to human heads to robotic ones.
Finally the relationships between any given ‘I’ scale and its i1 and i+1 smaller and bigger scales are always the same. So the relationship between cells, animals and ecosystems (the 3 scales of biological beings) can be formalized with the same laws that the relationships between 3 other scales, such as particles, atoms and molecules (3 scales of physical beings) and so on.
The 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions in time.
From a time perspective, reality has not only 3 dimensions of space, but also 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future. And the relationship between those scales perceived in space and in time is simple, but deeply meaningful to understand the complex Universe
– The scales of the 4^{th} dimension, simpler than the human scale are ‘the relative past’ if we consider an arrow of complexity and social evolution. So particles were born before atoms born before molecules born before cells born before men born before societies. As each new scale is made of quantic networks of ‘smaller beings’ of the previous scale. So without cells man cannot exist and without molecules cells cannot and so on.
– On the other hand the scales of the 5^{th} dimension, more complex than the human individual are scales of a relative future.
– And in between there is our scale or relative present, which exists as the dominant scale of reality, ‘now’.
It is then needed to separate past from future, just because we humans are in the present? Yes. Since in complex time theory, we shall find that the future is constantly calculated and chosen among many futures , while the past is already a single one. Thus the future is potentially including all possible pasts, as the past contains all the presents that were.
Yet for you to grasp fully that structure we need to do some clarification on the nature of time in physics and expand those notions to define ‘cyclical time’ and the concepts of relative past, present and future in terms of the density of information of a system, which is proportional to its duration in time.
Ðimotions of 4D entropy and 5D: mindwholeness or information create the scalar Universe.
In the graphs, the ternary scales that configure all physical systems, biological and sociological, both human and mechanical eco(nomic)systems, with ∆1 humans/machines, ∆º, mothers, companymothers, and ∆+1 civilisations and industrial nations.
Because the product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of all beings existing in such scale, within a certain connected organic structure are coinvariant, it is easy to define the metric of the 5th dimension (its coinvariant spacetime product):
‘Sp (Relative Size in space) x Tƒ (Relative speed of time clocks) = ∆ (constant of a relative plane of spacetime).’
That simple equation is the fundamental metric of the 5th dimension of scalar spacetime… which encloses all the other dimensions as ‘single spacetime’ studied by each science (in the graph we have ‘piled them up’, according to the inverse arrows of size in space or ENTROPY and speed of its time clocks that carry the information of the system, prioritising in an inverse fashion to physicists, INFORMATION, the dominant arrow of the Universe that is NOT about entropic death but growing information and LIFE.
But further on, we realized with the use of telescopes and microscopes that all systems are in detail made of smaller parts even if we cannot distinguish networks from wholes. So we need to consider two more dimensions, the fourth dimension of entropy, beyond the lineal motions of time, and the fifth dimension of social evolution into wholes, to complete the ‘experience’ of existence.
§pace is the synchronous perception of ðime Cycles, at a slow ratio of perception of its moving information by a fixed pointmind, the first dimension of existence. As even before a lineal motion (2D) exists, the being must ‘be’, emerge from the lower plane of selforganization, ∆1 in which it was seeded. Then the being will move after gauging information and start the stop and go motion that makes it perceivable to the external world.
So we can write a series of spacetime dimensions together as part of the processes of a world cycle:
4th Dimensions: entropy=death: ∆2 >> 1st dimensions: present organism: Limbs/fields of motion < 2nd dimensions: Hyperbolic body/waves>3rd ages: informative particleheads>>Social evolution of minds as points of an ∆+2: world: 5th dimensions: ∆§
The 4^{th} & 5^{th} dimensions in all sciences: causal logic and forecasting.
Science deals mostly with the total flow of time. Since, scientific laws consist in finding patterns in the events caused by a certain being, which will repeat those events called ‘actions’, once and again – fact, this which allows all sciences to predict the future, as we know where the sun will be next year – same repetitive cycle; and so on.
Thus while time in physics is mainly (but not only) related to the study of present space, in most sciences time is related to the understanding of the causal flows and cyclical patterns from the past used to forecast the future, according to those previous cycles of the past.
We conclude that the study of the 5th and 6th dimensions are mainly the realm of causality and duality, of logic and evolutionary science, of biological sciences, which have had much more success than physicists in exploring long ‘time’ ranges with evolutionary and organic, morphological theories about how information, form, changes with time.
Both works on time, Relativity and Evolution must be fusioned and that is the path of the future of science. And the theory that fusions them is not physics neither biology but the sciences that study both together, general systems sciences, whose formalism I developed in the past 2 decades as an Independent Researcher and explained in a series of lectures on the international congresses of Systems sciences (1).
General Systems Sciences could be a good name for it, complexity other, Absolute Relativity a third one. But let us call it only the study of the 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions of time in depth, as physicists study only present derivatives of time and evolutionists have not understood fully the morphological laws of evolution, its limits and repetitive patterns.
All this said is evident that science has always been concerned with the understanding of the 4^{th} dimension of past, its patterns and cycles to be able to forecast the 5^{th} of future, through the laws of causality that creates the future, departing from the past, through a series of ‘quantum dharmas’, simultaneous measures, perceptive stills of reality called presents
This is indeed the central question of knowledge – to know the causality of the past and how to extend it to understand the future:
Why things exist and become extinct in time, how they are created and assembly themselves in space, shaping ever more complex systems – in brief how the social networks, systems and scales of the Universe emerge into ‘being’ with selfsimilar laws, forming the discontinuous spacetime intervals of the fifth dimension.
The interplay of those dimensions and form generate the Universe:
Now, in those graphs we can see the most classic ‘generation’ of ‘meanings’ in the Universe, by combining the 2 ‘forms’, the line and the cycle, and the two ‘motions’, the lineal motion and the cyclical one (and its SxT combinations of waves and hyperbolic bodies).
Thus, the third element of T.Œ is the understanding of the fractal structure of spacetime, divided into infinite scales of relative size and speed of information, which are inverse but coinvariant, meaning that smaller beings run faster its clocks of information, coding larger beings (so genetics codes biological systems and quantum numbers material systems), whole larger beings move slower but can synchronize with its huge bodies a myriad of little beings (so the Earth guides the evolution of the information of its beings, with its weather cycles of energy and the black hole guides the informative vortex of stars and planets towards its centers with its gravitational waves).
In the graph we see the fundamental 3 scales of reality, the gravitational slower scale the human thermodynamic scale and the atomic, genetic scale.
This 5^{th} dimension and its formal metric are the key to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe, as the 3 ‘canonical scales’ of all superorganisms of reality, physical and biological systems extending through ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension (ab.∆), the quantumcellular ∆1 plane, the ∆ individual/thermodynamic plane and the ∆+1 organic, gravitational planes.
The fifth dimension orders all those scales of size and speeds of clocks into a ‘metric system’ able to explain all kind of ‘motions’ and ‘actions’ that take place in isomorphic ways in all those systems.
This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by PoincareEinstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.
Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, selfcentered entities of timespace that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.
Since any cycle has the logic properties of repetition, which are the origin of the patterns, we call ‘science’, whose completion breaks space into an outer world and an inner ‘vital space’, whose ‘gradient center’ is the ‘point of view’ of the system that gauges the external information of the cycle.
As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5^{th} dimension’ of scales of spacetime (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNAcells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.
And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a selfcentered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5^{th} dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a selfcentered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stockmarket’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.
But in the same manner cyclical time and fractal space applies to all systems of all sciences, the 5^{th} dimension and its metric apply unlike ‘physical concepts of spacetime’, such as cspeed deformations of time essential to 4D metric, to all systems NOT only far removed scales of physical time.
5D metric can explain from faster metabolic rates in smaller animals, with faster time cycles; to faster information processing in smaller chips with aster time cycles (Moore’s Law), or faster rotary options in smaller masses which have paradoxically faster rotary, attraction properties (rotating Black holes and quarks).
What it will be difficult for this writer after 20 years of exploring all the possibilities of this TŒ, and the immense number of questions resolved by it, is to ‘organize’ all that new knowledge in a manner that the reader does not get lost, due to its ‘encyclopedic extension’. Tƒ that aim when this blog is partially finished sometime during 2016, if he follows the top sentences, all should make sense.
Thus we shall try to give a general look to this TŒ in this first post, studying its 3 main elements: ‘Still, lineal, slow spaces’, ‘fast, cyclical time vortices’ and the 5th dimension which organizes them through the coinvariance of spatial size and time speed, Sp x Tƒ = K.
So we talk of a ‘fifth dimension’ of scales, which has a hyperbolic geometry with the lineal limit of quantum physics and the cyclical limit of cosmological gravitations, along which an infinite number of time cycles enclosing vital spaces, exist, in an orderly fashion provided by the metric of the 5th dimension.
5TH DIMOTION: SOCIAL ORGANIC EVOLUTION
∆+1: ‘Love each other as I have loved you’
Jesus, on the arrow of eusocial evolution, the sharing that merges a group of identical believers into a social god of a higher plane of existence.
In the next graphs we see some samples (from the reduced version with only energy and information networks) of those super organisms, and the human and economic systems.
The only way to explain the process of history is considering humans ‘citizenscells’ of social super organisms, nations and civilisations. It then becomes simple to understand all the apparent contradictions of our world, and its mass actions, both in human systems guided by economic=reproductive ‘bodynetworks’, and informative=political and cultural ‘brains’. It is the hypothesis of the organic paradigm of systems sciences, applied in this blog to understand all phenomena related to cultures, and human societies, on one side ‘coded by memes’, and eco(nomic)systems on the other, coded by digital flows of money.
In the graph, selfexplanative the reality of this planet and the two dominant super organisms. Unfortunately in a compacracy the dominant super organism, free citizen of the free market with all rights to credit, anonymous law ‘impunity’, and control of political power is NOT the super organism of mankind, its citizens and human mothers, but the companymother of machines and its FinancialMedia (informative machines head)/industrialmilitary (energetic and entropic machines) system, fast evolving into a global super organism with the digital language/head of money, which is used in its 90% not to serve the needs of man but the evolution and reproduction of those machines, which displace us from this terraformed planet.
So despite the dogeatdog individualist memes our our entropic age of mankind, dissolved and consumed by weapons and hate memes, the true Maslow pyramid of needs of species is social, based in the ‘arrow of love’ that structures parts into wholes from atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets and galaxies, all of them submitted to the same physiological laws that construct super organisms:
So human social prophets and artists the mind of our civilisations have always preached our collective program of survival, ‘welfare’ over warfare, which kills all civilisations.
God is Love and God rules over all, Love organize all beings of the Universe that want to survive into future wholes, stronger than its parts… As each species must express, through its languages, actions and beliefs, the mandate of multiplying, reproducing and becoming together growing into larger wholes that feel equal and dance in parallel as one….
So love is not a spiritual concept but the main attractive force of Nature, expressed for each species as a cyclical conservative, repetitive path of spacetime.
The same beings, doing in parallel the same actions, makes emerge a new plane of existence of the fifth dimension, a new whole that stretches from potential past to potential future, the scales of existence of reality. Sancho on ∑•
∆: ‘A human being is part of a whole, called by us the Universe, a part limited in ðime and §pace. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings, as something separated from the rest–a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circles of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.’
Einstein, on the relationship between human dust of ðime§pace and the whole organic Universe.