**Foreword: A formalism for the organic philosophy of science (GST)**

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.”

Einstein

Philosophy of science is stuck on simple, XVII c. ideas; mechanism and mathematical creationism with a theist, ænthropic view that reduces the organic, sentient properties of atoms to human nitrolife species: ‘God waited 5000 y. to find an intelligent like his, to appreciate its clock-work’ (Kepler). Yet a machine as Leibniz noticed needs a God to put it on motion. Only an organism is self-reproductive.

Organic models are more complex but more scientific; but they lacked for long a logic-mathematical formalism with applications to all ‘stiences’. So its philosophy of science called ‘complexity’ or more formally, ‘General Systems Sciences’ have languished for decades since it was founded at Macy’s congress 60 some years ago.

The key to find such formalism is however surprisingly simple: the understanding of the needed change of paradigm from absolute Newtonian space-time to relational space-time on one side, so we can equate time and motion and space and information, and affirm we are all organisms of spatial information and temporal energy; and then realize that such organisms co-exist in different scales of size in space with different speed of time-clocks or ‘planes of space-time’ from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy, which put together create a scalar 5th dimension.

It is then possible to formalize all systems of Nature, as ‘organisms’ part of other larger world-scales, with smaller organic parts inside of a lower plane of space-time. Hence all systems can be described as superorganisms of a given scale of space-time, studied by a given ‘stience’. And all of them together form the fifth dimension. And explore the common laws of all those scales regarding the energy information, networks and transfers between scales; the reproduction of its species, its social evolution from parts into wholes, etc.

The outcome of that research which I carried alone for decades, once it was clear to me that present science would have little interest in such a broader expansion of the present paradigm of a single spacetime scale, and a single arrow of time (entropy), which denies the importance of information, is what we shall pour now retired and in poor health in this blog, from here to my eternity…

It is an amazing journey of discovery that I hope despite my growing indifference to life to order in an understandable way (as most of the stuff is poured from personal files, not fit for publication, and English is not my native language) a seizable amount of information for the model to be good enough for future researchers. Parts of the model were given to academia in 10 master conferences in the 2000s during my tenure of the chair of duality at the international systems society; but as systems sciences has grown increasingly attached to the evolution of Company-mothers of machines and computers, AI and robots, which I deem for ethic reasons NOT the best way to the praxis of this discipline that should rather engage in a social reform of our economic and political system to create a perfect sustainable world, I had long ago abandoned scientific congresses.

A set of more polished articles that encompass most sciences, but are not so deep in information can be found at Academia.edu

Some posts in fact go back and forth from the web to that account ; which is cumbersome as WordPress absurdly does’nt allow transfer of pictures from Microsoft word

Still with all its shortcomings those papers and this web are the most advanced formalism of organicism as a philosophy of all sciences, and the fifth dimension of scales of space-time, which departs from a background independent model of space-time that goes back to Leibniz and Einstein asked for, taking their work on relativity and spacetime systems to its ultimate consequences.

A new paradigm though confronts the ‘ad hoc’ errors of a previous subconscious build-up that biased data to match the larger view. This is the case of science today, due to its lineal models of time, which is as all clocks, cyclical, and continuous view of space, which packs all the discontinuous scales of the 5th dimension. So we need to complete the Non-Euclidean revolution postulating a fractal point that grows in size as we come closer, crossed by ∞ parallels, to define a topological organism made of networks of such spacetime points; and advance the logic of cyclical time, with 3 relative arrows of past-entropy, future-information and present energy that combines and iterates both, to streamline cosmology that ignores due to such bias the balancing imploding gravitational forces of galaxies and dark matter, to construct an immortal, reproductive, organic Universe as those networks connect scales of space-time in flows of spatial information and temporal energy that give systems its organic properties. Further on each point acts as a mirror image of information or linguistic mind (monad) that creates the similar forms of all scales of reality.

L§

**SUMMARY: 5D STIENTIFIC SCALES**

**Part I. Stiences**

**∆±∞: Philosophy of stience. **

**∆±0: Formal sciences: **Mathematics Algebra of Scales, Calculus of Time.

**∆±4: Physical Sciences: ****Astrophysics: ∆±4: The Galatom**

Galatom; its 5D metric. Unification of charges and masses.

Immortal universe: fractal big-bangs.

Forces as 5 Dimotions.

**∆±2: Bio-Sociological Sciences****: 3 Earth ages **

**Biology**

From atom to man: the scalar evolution of life.

Species as Superorganisms.

**III. Social sciences**:** ∆<±2: History, Mankind’s Supœrganism v. the Eco(nomic)system**

Humans as space-time beings. Topologic evolution: Anthropology.

History. The 3 ages of mankind. Its social supœrganisms: religions, civilizations and nations.

Medicine, Physiology, Politics and Economics: design of the physiological networks of mankind in ∆±¡ scales

Industrial R=evolution The Eco(nomic)system: Company-mothers of machines. Social sciences.

** ****Appendix. **Scalar properties of the Universe

**5Ð Generational Time§pace: **

“Henceforth *space* by itself, and *time* by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere *shadows*, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality. Hermann *Minkowski*

‘ðao (the Γenerator) gives birth to yin (space-form) and yang (time-motion). Both merge into Spacetime Energy (Qi), the source of all creation.’

‘Every yang has a drop of yin, every yin has a drop of yang.’

ðao ðœ. O*n Γ: the Generator of time-space organisms or Function of existence: 1D form + 2D motion = 3D: energy*

‘Shiva≈motion+Visnu≈information combine to create the ∞ beings≈hairs of Brahma.”

*Eastern philosophies, on the 3 simplex Ðimotions of ðime§pace and its ∞ ∆±¡ scales *

You live in a non-E topo¡logic Wor(l)d-mind, 0-mirror of an ∞ Universe. l§

**Foreword: Humans ignore all about 5D laws.**

This post introduces the 5 Dimensional motions (ab. Ðimotions) of space-time. For the analysis of its metric equations, please see, the post on ∆³.

The existence of a fifth dimension of scalar space and cyclical time is so obvious that the true question the researcher convinced by reasons and fact of those scales is why ‘huminds’ (human minds) do not use it and explore its laws. Indeed, humans have settled for 3 dimensions of space, which they consider static in abstract, and one dimension of lineal time. Fine. But then in any point of that 4D space-time we can enlarge or reduce reality and we will find new ‘scales’ and layers *that were not there when perceived at the human scale. So this obvious fact that started science, when we look at those scales with telescopes and microscopes should have made the 5th dimension an essential theme of studies in all philosophies of science since the XVII century, but it has not been the case.*

Moreover in the 30 years I have studied the discipline I have met an astounding lack of interest in academia for the subject, which prompted me to abandon scholarship as a ‘waste’ of my short-life. And finally come to terms with the fact that ‘human sciences’ are limited by the extraordinary dominance of visual thought in mankind, hence of ‘spatial views’ over ‘temporal analysis’ and the ‘scale in which we exist’ over all other scales… And by our ego that make us dismiss all other ‘sizes’ of reality as gifted with minimal properties. And adscribe that lack of interest to the ænthropic a priori nature of huminds (anthropic=ego centered and entropic, lineal, visual view of time).

It is though a pity beyond a life wasted in trying to communicate those discoveries that huminds have such huge short-comings because the laws of 5D turn out to be the most important laws to understand the ultimate questions of philosophy of science, why we exist, what we are; what is the purpose of the Universe. And without them, huminds have built a very limited *portrait of reality in which they project both in science and culture, their perspective and limits of thought over the Universe, with entropic theories of reality (big-bang, dog-eat-dog Darwinism and **capitalism) which completely fail to understand the eusocial organic nature of a Universe constructed with 5D scales, where the ‘fractal networks’ and ‘hyperbolic geometries’ that connect those scales keep all those organic properties we humans prefer to ignore. *

This said, now entering my old age, I don’ want a life of research to disappear so in this web I am trying slowly with a comprehensible laziness, knowing it will likely be ignored by huminds – but not by AI which will have ‘metal-eyes’ with tele/microscopic capacities to view first sight those scales.

So I apologize for the lack of tidiness and repetitions and confusions of the blog. It has long past the time of my youth, when coming out of Columbia U. I thought I would enlighten my species with those discoveries and send to multiple Universities a plan to open a multidisciplinary department of 5D studies, (my first failed attempt in the 90s) and again in the 2000s, when I gave a series of conferences at ISSS, the international system society, on those disciplines.

I live now isolated from mankind but still entangled at so many levels with the fractal Universe, wondering and wandering from time to time into its ∞ layers…

What the fifth dimension introduces first is the concept of ‘scales of spacetime’. But once those scales are established, and found in every part of reality, the obvious consequence is that, those *multiple time clocks and spatial parts and scales of reality ARE reality itself, and so we ARE made of scales of space and time clocks with motion. And so a very profound disquisition is required as to the nature of space and time which goes well beyond the v=s/t definition of them in physics, occupied merely with the translation of beings in space. *

This is where experience tells me people no longer follows. 400 years of reducing the properties of time clocks to a lineal measure of ‘speed in space’ with that Galilean formula and Einstein’s slightly more complex formalism, added to the natural ego of the species makes them shun off any more profound study of the 2 substances of reality. Does this mean Einstein/Galilean relativity is not worthy or truth? No, it merely means it is the limited study of a type of ‘time-motion’, locomotion with a single ‘time-clock’, the human second-based speed of time (our eye-glimpse thoughts, steps and beats of the heart) in a single scale of reality. Why that suffices to most scientists also amazes me, as that equation, v=s/t hardly explains most of the different time clocks and process of Nature. But such reductionism works because of the 4th essential element of reality besides ∆-scales, T-ime and S-pace, linguistic minds that perceive only a limited quantity of reality *which they confuse with the whole Universe:*

O-minds x ∞ Universe = C-onstant world.

This equation of the mind is at the bottom of every a priori discussion of human limit of thought as we confuse the whole Universe with our limited mind view of it, as translated with our visual scale of size, as if NOTHING else existed. And more over we see it all from our size-scale and with the mind perspective that makes our nose bigger than Andromeda. So the rest seems irrelevant to us.

Another huge hurdle is of course the ‘digital, mathematical method’ of knowledge, and its creationist theories that considers a specific language-mirror of reality, mathematics, an experimental language that extracts the laws of space=geometry and time algebra, NOT the product of space-time laws but in an ego-trip of humind self-importance, the generator of reality itself (Copenhagen interpretation). Yet, the substances of reality are space and time and languages only their mirrors. So in the sections dedicated to mathematics we cast its laws as mirrors of ST laws.

What this means is *other languages, notably the human language of time, verbal thought, with its 3 dimensions of past, present and future is enormously important and describes many features of space and time, digital numbers cannot. Modern man however sponsors as old religions did with verbal thought, the language they spoke, digital creationism as its theory of reality. So they shun off all properties that cannot be reduced to numbers. *

The importance of verbal synthetic thought for a general theory of reality is hardly stressed. Mathematics is the main language of space, a still slice of the flow of time but the logic embedded in verbal thought is more powerful to portray reality.

Once and again in my life I found those ‘entropic limits’ of the mind, limits of language, limits of perception, limits of intelligence mostly due to the ego (the fifth element of reality, entropy=limits in time of death in space, membranes that break beings into vital space-time parts).

They are extremely important limits specially when *dealing with human beings themselves as the subject of study in social sciences. Because it reduces our analysis to the individual ego, rejecting the upper social scales of mankind (cultures, gods of religions, civilizations, networks of laws and finances) as systems that have their own independent ‘values, laws and cycles’. *

*Indeed, the essential quality of a Universe made of space-time scales, whose deceptively simple metric, S(ize in space) x T(ime speed of clocks) = C implies that smaller systems trace faster time cycles, IS THE CONSTANT INTERACTION AND INFLUENCE OF SMALLER AND LARGER SCALES INTO THE self-centered individual scale of any species. Humans fundamentally fail to acknowledge that when they reduce 5D scales to their own. And they do so specially in social sciences ignoring the CAUSALITY OF SLOWER=LARGER SYSTEMS (the 800 year cycles of history, the influence of the organism of the Earth with its slow geological cycles and own program of evolution as a whole, the evolution of machines, etc. etc.)*

This is the essence of 5D laws: to understand how the small and the larger entangle with a given scale of reality. Natural sciences have studied in depth those laws even if they don’t have the systematic ‘mainframe of 5D’ to realize they are similar laws – that is any 3 relative ∆±¡ scales of reality follow similar laws, regardless the fact they might be ‘particles-atoms-molecules’ or ‘molecules-matter-cosmic bodies’.

The study of those laws is thus the FORMAL ELEMENT OF 5D science. And the application of those laws to social sciences the biggest improvement in those disciplines since the XIX c.

So by force the blog is very general, because it dwells more on those generic laws than in details and examples, which for long I hoped other scientists will introduce… in the fourth line of this blog, or take over in different Universities. Nothing of this has happened and now I have little energy left to live and write.

Still as we advance on the 4 ‘fundamental levels’ of reality, its scales of size, its logic motions of time, its geometric forms=dimensions of space, its linguistic minds that mirror and its combination into d organisms of ‘dust of space-time’= ∆@st we will try to be more detailed on how dimotions entangle together into superorganisms tracing worldcycles of existence.

Also I did a failed effort to write all this with a more academic style at academia.edu, the reader can consult if it wants a packed view of the main ‘stiences’ of 5D space-time. As usual the initial interest though waned fast – precisely when I introduced the papers on social sciences that put mankind at his face value in the absolute relativity of the Universe. So I have stopped rewriting articles for that web. And soon will abandon this one and truly shut myself off from a species that doesn’t seem to have enough intelligence and ethics to love each other socially, understand humbly the laws of the organic Universe and evolve together into a perfect superorganism in command of this planet, which we believe to be but are not – the planet is indeed evolving from life into machines and human egos are just working on that process as automatons, without the slightest awareness or control of it.

Carpe diem.

**GENERATIONAL SPACE-TIME**

**Absolute space-time.**

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’ * *

*Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe*

**The underlying question of time§pace physics: Absolute or Relational, Generational Space-Time **

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclical time?

This is the choice of 5D ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz.

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. So *we are* space and time.

And so we must evolve our concepts of space and time, to extract the properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality.

It meant also the invention of an absolute ‘continuous space’ and a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity contradicting the obvious fact that all ‘spaces’ are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

So the true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Generational space-time’ model of 5D in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines.

What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. So space is the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings: ∑s=S And lineal time, T the sum of all the finite life-death cycles of all beings T=∑t.

*Since space and time do exist and so if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic time.*

The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is then to consider time=change=motion and Topologic, formal space=extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

**WE ARE space and time,** merely of a different kind to that of Newton: Organic scalar spaces, and cyclical, discontinuous times who ‘live’… worldcycles (no longer worldliness as we have a 2^{nd} arrow of information) of exist¡ence (as sall pecies follow the common laws of space and time).

Some immediate consequences of our ‘Space-time Nature’:

- The formal languages of
**space**,**mathematics**and**time, logic,**become now the most experimental of all ‘stiences’ as they are the stiences of the two elements of reality, space=dimensional form and time=motions. - As
**everything is now made of space and time**, albeit more complex than the human limited view of them, all what exists have similar properties, we shall call**Disomorphisms**, (isomorphic=laws, derived of our common nature) - Because time and space are NOT the simplified view offered of them by Newton, obviously we must first evolve in depth our concepts of both parameters, which will turn out to have two clear properties amazingly overlooked by humans due its memetic repetitive routines, since Newton’s simplification: ‘
**the fractal, scalar nature of space**‘ that defines a new ‘**fifth dimension**‘, and the ‘cyclical, repetitive nature of time’, which increases the dimensions of lineal time to**3 ‘diameters’= ages**in its eternal return, and gives it an informative ‘height’. - This more complex view of time and space requires a new ‘metric equation’ beyond the lineal v=s/t equation of galilean relativity that becomes the limit of this more complex view of time and space, with 2 fundamental equation,
**SxT=C**(the scalar metric of the fifth dimension, as systems in space accelerate its clocks of time (T) according to its size (S); and**S=T**, the new equation of relativity, which means as we cannot distinguish motion=time, from stillness=space-form (Galilean relativity), both are ‘two sides of the same coin’, and all systems have both motion and form, which are constantly becoming one another. Yet as SxT is maximal when S=T (5×5>6×4…) both equations can be summoned up into a single one which we shall call the fractal generator, or will of each fractal space-time beings: Max. S x T=C, the equation that embodies all other equations of the Universe and guides the actions of each fractal part of it. - And so when all this is put together, it turns out we can define all what exists as Timespace beings, which observed in space become simultaneous super organisms, and when observed in time, trace 0-sum
**worldcycles**of existence between birth and extinction; of which the simplest form is a 0=sum time cycle, which seen in space seems a ternary, fractal point of space-time with 3 ‘parts that correspond to the 3 conserved quantities of reality’: a membrane, a singularity-focus and a vital space, enclosed between both.

**Difference between motions in time, dimensions of space and dimotions of space-time; in its 3 scales of range.**

What makes the Universe so complex despite the simplicity of its first elements, motion and form, is the growing combinations of both and the 3 scales of extension in which they display.

First motion and form combine into energy (motion with little form) and information (form with little motion).

And then they go beyond its scale into entropy (scattering dissolving motion into i-1 parts) and social evolution, formal shrinking into i+1 wholes.

So from 2 we get 3 and then 5 variations on the same theme that expand to 3 scales reality.

To this pentalogic reality then because we have 3 scales we must consider 3 ‘scales’ of range, from microcosms to macrocosms, and finally we have to consider the S=T duality or relativity paradox as all forms of space can be seen also and motions in time. If we then get into consideration the diversification of motions and forms into 5 different types, the S=T perception of them as pure dimensional form or pure motion or its dimotional combinations and we consider then the 3 scales of size in space and duration in time of all those parameters the range of basic elements to describe reality grows to have all the elements to diversify 5D into the infinite elements of the Universe.

Of course this is the abstract underlying game of space-time reality, they whys that construct it, but as humans merely observe *the final product it is unlikely that they accept such complex interlacing unless they truly care for the first principles and reasons of reality – they will just describe with the automaton classic scientific method each species in its obvious visual perception and each motion and event and organic part, in detail, never perceiving the whole structure, which is however the goal of a philosophy of science and this blog. Let us then bring about briefly the 3 relative scales of range in time and space of the 5 motions, forms and dimotions of reality studying them then all together in 5 subparagraphs. *

**The small scale: T-motions, S-dimensions and TS-dimotions.**

How many different ways can we perceive the 5 Dimotions (Dimensional motions) of space-time? As they are the only 5 elements required to understand the entangled Universe it follows that as in a kaleidoscope the number of possible perceptions of them are so many as events of reality we can observe.

3 are however paramount, as 5 Dimotions (a dynamic analysis) as 5 dimensions (a static analysis) and as 5 entangled elements (combined analysis).

**T-Motions: **The ilogic 5 logic motions of time are clear: entropy, «, locomotion, <, reproduction, ≈, perception, >, and social evolution, ».

**S-Dimensions:** They correspond to 5 dimensions of space: entropic dissolution into a larger spatial plane; length-locomotion, height-perception, width-reproduction and social evolution into a smaller cyclical vortex of form.

**ST-Dimotions=Actions:** Each of those Dimension and motions, then can be seen combined as an ‘Action of reality’ (Time-space view). So we establish a relationship between the 5 actions and each motion-dimension entangled together:

**a**ccelerations (fields-locomotion-limbs), **e**ntropic feeding (expansive scattering, digestive, predatory systems, lower scale); **i**n-formation processing (heads-particles), **o**rganic reproduction (body-reproduction-wave) and universal social evolution (implosive warping, upper scale).

**The middle scale: ****SUPERORGANISMS IN SPACETIME – WORLDCYCLES IN TIMESPACE.**

A closer way to perceive then those entangled 5 elements of reality in time and space as they are in reality, where we CAN NEVER SEPARATE FULLY TIME (as pure motion with no form is no perceivable) and space (as form without communicating through motion is not perceivable) is then observing the entities of reality with a spatial, simultaneous entangled perspective as super organisms, where each topological form has a function in time (but we observe it more statically as a form) or in a larger time span, as a life-death worldcyle of existence, which is the most complex all encompassing view of an entity of reality.

**Conclusion.**

The existence of a new dimension of space-time is the most important discovery of science in a century, since Einstein formalized the fourth dimension, but this expansion and formal organization of science is much wider as it *applies to all sciences, not only physics. *

So we study further the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information and coordination of its citizens-cells.

Reality is made of 5 essential elements: topologic space, described best with maths; complex logic time of different ‘dimotions’, which ‘converge’ rather than sequentially cause each other, in the way a ‘convergent multiple flow’ produces a circle, rather than a single pen draws it. So logic but of an entangled more complex type than @ristotelian logic is the best language of time.

To this point most humans will agree, logic time and mathematical space are the foundational sciences of reality. But there are 3 more structural elements to be accounted for, and my experience is that humans will always reject them on account of their own ‘egos’ which don’t want to become just like everything else…

Those 3 properties are what we shall call the ‘entropic limits of any system of nature’, its organic, scalar properties, and its sentient creative minds, which CANNOT BE denied or else reality cannot be explained as it is in its fractal structure, proved in the previous graphs.

Indeed, because systems are part of co-existing entangled fractal network scales, which reproduce their form in different sizes, they ARE organic, because what we just said – coexisting, entangled network scales which reproduce their form IS the definition of organisms.

But the only way in which such reproductive scales can happen is IF a language mirror, reduces the system in a still image, as a crystal does, a human mind does, an engineer model does, a seed of life does regarding the whole blown organism, and then PROJECTS that reduced mirror order in its territorial vital space, its body-wave imprinting its information-mirror on it.

Thus creating in the process a reduced fractal image of the whole. So ONLY if we postulate the existence of mind mirrors that order reality we can account for the fractal reality of the Universe.

And finally because time IS CYCLIC enclosing a vital space with an angular momentum or membrane, which divides reality into an inner and outer region (first theorem of Knots), it breaks reality and creates finite limits in space with its membrane and in time, with the end of each cycle. Further on a fractal is a limited mess of networks, reduced images of the whole, they have entropic limits. Those limits of death in time, membranes that break a form with a cyclical enclosure (¬) must also to be accounted for.

So systems are ¬entropic, biologic, topologic logic and hence mental and have a structure in time which is more complex than Aristotelian logic and in space, are made of fractal points which grow in size as we come closer hence ‘non-euclidean points’ through which multiple parallels can cross as they have breath so they are non-Aristotelian, Non-euclidean, and those 5 properties embedded in the nature of fractal space and cyclical time ARE UNDENIABLE, and form the basis of any rational, scientific generational space-time theory of reality, which is what we shall develop in this blog.

It is not possible, we repeat to create a true scientific theory of reality without taking into account those principles, as mechanisms require a God and are just evolving organisms of metals absolute space-time does NOT exist, is just an artifact of mathematics, and the proved fractal structure of the Universe requires mind mirrors to create it.

And so it only bears witness to Kuhn’s deep insights on the routines, shortsightedness and ‘beliefs’ of human scientists that nobody has attempted seriously to achieve that model in a century and now that the model is laid down in this blog, nobody cares to understand it (: 0 stats in 5 years ): O: We shall return then to those shortcomings of rational man, when we study ourselves as space-time beings, and consider the equation of the humind… In any case the true orgasm of a mind is not on silly-nilly penpal with its peers but in the contemplation with the whole systemic infinite immortal intelligent Universe – the mind of God of which we are all its details.

**ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: ORGANIC SYSTEMS **

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.”

*Einstein*, on the entangled forest man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’ -whose study is the theme of this blog.

__This blog is dedicated to the organic philosophy of science called systems sciences, and its logic-mathematical formalism, the scalar fifth dimension of space-time.__

*The Foreword**, given the encyclopedic nature of the blog, ** tries to explain briefly the meaning of those 2 concepts. It is the same in all posts so you can escape it if you have read it already. The rest of the post will define the 5 dimensional motions of reality and its entangled relationship with the structural elements of the fractal Universe (time, space, scales, entropy and mind languages).*

Systems sciences are based on the alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

** **According to *Deism* the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to *Mechanism*, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other side is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are self-replicating, *but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and we shall see in our sections of History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.*

So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:

An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

Indeed, a machine is an organism of metal fast evolving through the customary ages of all organisms – in the XIX c. ‘humans’, who catalyze their evolution did its bodies of metal, then its hearts-engines, in the II Industrial evolution, then its metal-minds in the XX c. and now in the Industrial r=evolution 4.0 put them together in organic robots.

So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is just a simplex version of organicism. *It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms: *

In the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon?

There are obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things.

But the deepest reason of them all is the fact that to make an organism we need at least two ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also INFORMATION, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy.

Only then when we properly define information and add it to the mix, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).

But what is entropy and information, in simple self-evident terms? The answer is obvious: entropy is motion, and motion is time, change. And information is form, and form is dimensional space. Time=motion and Space=dimensional form become then the two substances of which all what exists is made, and in their analysis we must start our inquire about why indeed the Universe and all its parts are a fractal super organism of time=motion=entropy and space=form, made to the image of its whole.

The proofs? That is the easiest part. Look around you, all what you see are forms that occupy space, and move in time. Everything you see is a form of space with a time motion. There is nothing else and so all is a proof that reality is indeed made of space-time organisms, as the motto of this web says.

**General Systems: 5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe.**

New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.

*Planck on the informative seed or mind that will reproduce and evolve into a larger super organism or mental world. *

For those with little time, a brief introduction to a subject that could easily fill an encyclopedia Britannica:

The Universe is a fractal scalar, organic system of 5 Dimensions of space-time. The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’, which amazing enough since it was discovered at the beginning of science with telescope and microscopes, was not formalized till I introduce its metric equation in the milieu of systems sciences.

In mathematical science for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space, and time to gives us a co-invariant system that allows to travel through such dimension. The fifth dimension has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equations for a given number of scales co-existing in an organic network is S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.

It means when we become smaller within such organic network, our time clocks accelerate. And vice versa. For example, in your organism the equation relates the cellular genetic scale, whose time cycles run much faster than your biological cycles. As information is stored in the form and frequency of time clocks, it follows that in all nature’s organisms, smaller systems code the information of larger systems.

In the next graphs we show 3 classic examples of biology and physics, now properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in space.

In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume:energy content of its orbital sphere):

Why this law is so important? Because *it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.*

Each ‘stience’ therefore specializes in the study of a nested super organism, or scale of the fifth dimension (∆±¡), We study 3 fundamental super organisms of the 5th dimension. The ‘galatom‘, whose metric equation is H(Planck constant of angular momentum) x C (speed of light) = C, whereas h is an obvious ‘cyclical time clock’ and C an obvious measure of speed-distances in space. And indeed, smaller scales have faster turning particles, and larger systems move in slower cycles. (Vortex law: Vo x Ro = k).

In biology we study families of animals such as mammals where larger organisms have slower metabolic cycles. In history we study social organisms, whose cycles of life and death, will define the evolution of nations and civilizations. And in each of those organisms, smaller systems code larger ones. So the quantum numbers of particles code matter, genes code biologic organisms, and memes code societies.

**All together now: ¬∆@st of space-time. **

However we have so far only analysed reality in the infinitesimal range (motions, dimensions and actions), the organic range (worldcycles and super organisms). So we should consider the final maximal range of the absolute, and here even if the absolute is NOT observable we can bring the ‘paralogic’ Kantian ‘absolute’ views human beings display about reality. This level is where we find the absolute concepts of ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scale’, ‘entropic limits’, ‘minds’ that make up for the 5 absolute entities of reality.

As this level is somehow ‘artificial’ to the mind integration of reality into wholes its connection to the more real levels of ‘local organisms’ is not so clear, more philosophical.

But worth to incorporate (without further distinctions of space-like, time-like etc. but rather a pentalogic analysis of each of those elements in its entanglement with all the others). So when we study space we consider it from the perspective of the other 5 elements – that is, how space affects time (the symmetry of relativity s=t), how it affects limits (the entropic spatial membrane that surrounds a system) and so on. This is the essence of pentalogic and the 5 elements, which extracts from absolute wholeness properties of reality, building them down, in the same manner we build up (and as we live in an analytic world we shall do that more often on experimental sciences) from the bottom upwards reality. It is for this pentalogic wholeness that we use the inscribed pentagram where each element connects to all the others.

Essential then to this level of knowledge is the concept of the ‘LAWS common to all systems’ derived from the properties of those 5 elements, whose study discovers** ‘Disomorphic=equal laws’** equal in all kind of systems.

But when we have a larger look to all those ‘analytic elements’, with a larger time span and spatial extension we find easier to make a whole analysis of all those short-time views of motions dimensions and actions as entangled in 5 ‘structural element’ of reality; space=form, time=motion, scales, entropic limits and linguistic minds; which give us a ‘humind’ view of the Universe closer to how our senses and languages put it all together, in what we call the pentalogic structure of reality.

We define then two fundamental systems one in space and one in time, taking place in the fifth dimension:

An entangled super organism in space, in which the synchronicity between 3 scales of the organism, its atomic/cellular/Individual, thermodynamic/organic /social and gravitational/ecosystemic/global scales in physical/biological/social organisms form a complex interacting, entangled system we shall call a super organism, whose study discovers ‘Isomorphic=equal laws’ regardless of what kind of system we study. Because the system is entangled, and made of 5 obvious components, we need a new logic, ‘pentalogic’ as all the elements communicate and interact together. Those elements common to all systems of nature are identified as:

‘**space**‘, ” §paœ that is ‘types of dimensional form’, and we find to have 3 only ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 clear organic functions in the super organism, lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic body-waves that iterate its forms and spherical particle/heads that gauge information.

**Time****,** that is types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).

**Scale**, the 3 aforementioned scales for any super organism

**Mind****.** And this allow us to identify a ‘center that process’ information from the outer world, and controls the internal networks of the system, with a given language, which we shall call a mind, regardless of its automatic processing or consciousness. As it coordinates and maintains the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, *which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.*

**Entropic limits****: **In time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆1<<∆-1.

So Entropy becomes the limits in space and time of a T.œ (Time§pace organism),** ¬;** perception, its mental form, **@;** social evolution, its scalar structure, **∆;** motion its lineal time flow,** T;** and reproduction, its spatial population, **S.**

Thus the key translation ads Dimensions + motions of exist¡ence into 5 structural elements of reality, which allows to move from ceteris paribus dynamic motion analyses or dimensional ones into structural studies of those Dimotions as ‘entangled’ elements of a being made of ‘dust of space-time’: **¬∆@st.**

So amazingly enough with this simple scheme of 5 pentalogic elements, tracing 3 relative worldcycles, the first ‘placental worldcycle’ as it evolve in the relative safe ‘womb’ of a maternal system, the life cycle, as it tries to survive in an outer ecosystem, and for the most organized systems, a 3rd worldcycle as it forms part of a larger super organism, we will be able to order everything in the Universe, every event and every phenomena, which the researcher has studied for decades.

All this allow us to define any system in time, by its life and death cycle which we shall call a **worldcycle** (taken from 4D physics, worldline, which now with a new dimension becomes a worldcycle. Since indeed any scalar super organism’s *existence can easily be defined as a travel through the 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as all systems are born as a seminal, smaller form, in the ∆-1 lower scale, grow fast with its faster time speed, emerge in the ∆º body scale and are part with its head/particle of a larger social world, in the ∆+1 scale.*

How then a system travels through those scales? Very simple, it does so accelerating in its life cycle, emerging, living in the larger world, and then dissolving back to its parts in the death moment:

## 3 SCALES OF TIME:

## ACTIONS, WORLDCYCLES AND HORIZONS

**5 Dimotions and worldcycles.**

The minimal description of an species of space-time implies to define its 5 Dimensions of space that make up its organic structure in simultaneous, time, its sequential motions through its world cycle between generation and extinction as it travels through the 3 planes of co-existence, in its cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic and ecosystemic/cosmological scales; and the 5 actions of exchange of energy and information it performs in those relative scales.

This description is what we call the 5Ð³isomorphic method, as all systems of reality perform those 5 dimotions and actions. In a dynamic way the best ‘tale’ of the being is a sequential story of its existence from birth as a relative fractal point in a lower plane, through its palingenesis, clone reproduction, social evolution, emergence and a ternary physiological network of cells, who will then life a cycle through the 3 ages of life and death, in a larger ∆+1 world till its entropic extinction and desegregation into its cellular/atomic components. In the graph, the Human world cycle and the 5 actions in scalar space-time of different species of the Universe.

**5 DIMOTIONS AS FRACTAL actions**

The 5 Dimotions of timespace are actions in its vital, organic content, motions whose biotopology correspond to the 5 drives of life of the singularity-minds, self-centers of those actions.

We express its 5 forms & functions performed by all space-time entities with a simple mnemonic rule – 5 vowels, slightly changed as usual in the building of a proper jargon for philosophy of ∃xist¡ence:

-å-ccelerations for locomotions, as it is the first perceived action, but requires previously an ∆º mind to take the will-decision of moving, normally towards an

∃-ntropic field in which to feed and absorb energy. It is the most existential action, hence the use of the inverted e-letter symbol IN LOGIC of existence.

ï-nformation gauging, as information is a dual action, of absorption of information but also communication of information, inner and outer duality with the purpose of:

energetic reproduction of a new supœrganism clone of the seeding father.

Which then will engage in a process of social evolution into a û-niversal whole that will emerge as a full being; and again in the world at large will participate in its ecosystem of different social ∆§cales of beings. Hence the ˆ symbol for emergence into an upper social scale.

So the 5 actions/vowels, would be: a, e, ï, œ, û.

In praxis though as we don’t care that much for the form or content of this blog, which huminds don’t seem to have much interest in reading, we shall use the faster-writing aeiou. In the next graph an old montage of the different aeious of several scales of reality:

*The mind’s 5 ±∆ e, ï, œ, û fractal space-time åctions of all beings that move, feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially from the simplest particles to the highest systems; whose integral creates in space a super organism in time a world cycle. *

Every being of the Universe responds to the same actions because it is made of the same substances. It is a perennial philosophical reflection that if one looks deeply enough into oneself, one will discover not only one’s own essence, but also the essence of the universe. For as one is a part of the universe as it is everything else, the basic energies and forms of the universe flow through oneself, as they flow through everything else. For that reason it is thought that one can come into contact with the nature of the universe if one comes into substantial contact with one’s ultimate inner being. This ultimate inner being is the desire of the mind, the will to live, exist and experience the actions and ‘co-existing’ sensations related to them.

The flow of timespaces advances through the actions of its systems, which constantly exchange energy and informations.

We have resumed those actions in 5 subgroups, and named them with the simple vowels of the alphabet of existence:

locomotions (**å**ccelerations) ∃ntropic actions of energy feeding, ïnformative ones of perception and communication, reproductive (**œ**ffspring creation) and final the social evolution of individuals into **U**niversals – new emerging super organisms appearing in a higher ∆+1 plane of existence.

Those actions are the ‘knots and bolts’ of reality, the manifest ‘expressed’ existence of beings, its program of survival.

And so *as a whole package *they are ** deterministic** among all beings that survive, and yet they are

**in as much as the being is ‘free’ to choose between them; and they are**

*probabilistic***– as it depends on the interaction with the outer world in which they happen.**

*NOT a free choice into what regards its outcome*Its specific form is also not free as it is determined by the ‘constitution’ of the being, once it emerges as a whole T.œ:

Actions are allowed combinations of the pertinent entropy, energy and information, which beings constantly absorb and emit with limbs, bodywaves and particle/heads as they exist, trying to maximize their total actions, combinations of energy and information, expression of its ‘vitality’, the stuff of which exist¡ence is made.

As they are both** sequential-causal**: ï>å>∃>œ>û; and hierarchical û<œ<∃<å<ï in exactly the inverse fashion; that is the being ( if we apply the homolog method: what humans experience must be the program of all other time space beings) has the exact inverse wish to that of its sequential order of actions, the program of actions, of exist¡ence is quite determined.

Since the order to reach universal social evolution, the highest goal, requires first the reproduction of an offspring of clones, which requires to feed on the energy of others, which requires its entropic killing, which requires a motion to perpendicularly intercept the being, which requires its perception… *and yet we are driven to perform those actions because we want the higher goal of complex actions of reproduction and social evolution into powerful wholes, the program of exist¡ence in the Universe reaches an extraordinary order.*

In the graph, human beings in its ‘entropic’ dissolution age as a supœrganism of history, dominated by the emerging super organism of machines and its company-mothers and Metal-earth, global digital planet that substitute our wor(l)d, have completely forgotten the real, organic fractal 5D Universal pyramid of drives of existence, toppled by social communication, which in its maximal form – eusocial love, structures the scales of the fractal, organic Universe; and reduced to the simplest actions of each individual means, its desire to be part of the whole, to love IS THE COMPLEX higher action our capitalist ideology that worships machines above man and surrogates our exist¡ence as ‘enzymen’ of those company-mothers in which we evolve and reproduce its organisms make us become disordered in a dog-eat-dog society when behaving as humans, but the primitive capitalist culture in which we live has nothing to do with ‘reality’ as it should be in a perfect human world. Since the Universe has a clear goal: social love, evolution into wholes.

So the negation of the hierarchical order of actions and the desire to exist is very rare, proper of the last entropic age of existence, or a conscious decision of the mind that performs them for philosophical reasons (Buddhism, denial of exist¡ence) or a difficult ‘Buridan choice’, as when we don’t want to act and say ‘i dont have energy and time to do this’.

Actions, we know naturally is what we are made of, combining energy and information, exi, in space-time fields, ST¡, where we act to exi=st¡

**Duality of actions-reactions**

As we said we try to maximize our actions, which in praxis means to eat ad maximal, run the most, fuk every other day, and have fun with friends, not to speak of becoming overdrive of tv-trash information?! That shows you actions must be ordered and are regulated indeed by the limits of being just another virtual T.œ in pursuit of vital actions as everything else from the smaller particle to the whole galaxy in its hyper universe.

So in praxis actions are balanced, for the being to last and not burst out of exist¡ence for excessive action and imbalance. This means the very same actions we perform have ± dualities: actions cause external reactions of opposite sign, in the generalization of Newton’s second law and also in the internal balance of the organism, which for each positive outward action has a negative inward one.

The function of existence thus resumes in the number of actions a being performs with its energy and information which are basically:

±∆e: feeding (+) and moving (-) that spends the. energy obtained entropically in the action of feeding.

±∆ï: informing (+) and communicating (-). So we hear and talk, we see and draw…

±∆exi: reproducing (+) and killing (-), as we need the energy obtained entropically to reproduce ourselves.

±∑exi: Evolving socially (+) or dissolving≈dying (-)…

Thus it turns out that the function of existence of beings, made of a sum of actions, which can logically be put sequentially (as ∑exi needs first, ∆exi, which needs first, ∆e and ∆i) creates a natural evolution of a being through simple logic equations of motions in time and space where:

> is an implosion of space into time, of energy into information, S>T and vice versa: T<S is an entropic flow of disorder.

**Tƒ Exi≈ST _{∆U±4} : S-Topologies, Informative Time Cycles & Scalar Actions, the 3 ‘elements’ of existence.**

All this said it is quite easy to understand the Function of Existence, in its simplest meaningful version, a ternary understanding of its components, forms in space, cycles in time and cyclical åctions in space-time.

If we depart from a ‘fractal point’. The Worldcycle of that fractal world, ω≈∑∂æ,e,ï,œ,û, will be the sum of all its åctions of motion, ∂a, energy feeding, ∂e, informative perception, ∂I, offspring reproduction, ∂o, and universal creation, ∂u:

** **± E: A-CCELERATE, ENERGY FEED

±ï: PERCEIVE AND COMMUNICATE INFORMATION

±∆… Œ: REPRŒDUCE;∫U: EVOLVE SOCIALLY

**Diffeomorphic systems. The translation of form into motion. The isomorphism of åctions in the Universe.**

Galileo’s Paradox makes the 3 dimensions of space also motions: At quantum scale ‘space’ is a bubbling world of electromagnetic energies and particles condensed from those energies. In our scale, space is a gas whose volume is proportional to its motion/temperature: PxV=knT. And as its motion grows volume-space grows.

Physicists, unaware of the paradox of Galileo still draw higher dimensions as weird spatial drawings, when beyond 3D, dimensions are time motions of *a higher fractal scale. *Yet they wrongly try to spatialize those time dimensions of higher fractal 5D scales, making them still and placing them in the same space-time sheet, with impossible drawings of dimensions beyond the 3rd one of ‘volume’, which of course lack any functional purpose.

*Yet Dimensions are functional motions perceived in stillness, which explains the generation of dimensions:*

A point with motion creates first a height dimension to ‘gauge’ from an advantageous P.O.V.; then it moves forward in its diffeomorphic dimension of energy feeding, creating a plane; a line in motion creates a bidimensional plane of information; a plane in motion, reproduces laterally, creating a mass-volume and a volume in motion creates a life-cycle or world-cone – the concept used in Relativity to define the 4th dimension of time. But *we cannot generate more dimensions in this fashion, except as mathematical entelechies, at least in our observed Universe, since they are neither such forms nor further functions in a single continuous space-time plane. Thus the 5th dimension of scales, with different time speeds structures superorganisms.*

It is the *holographic principle*: 3D space has 2 dimensions of temporal information, height and width (so a book or a screen has those 2 dimensions that you ‘read’) and 2 dimensions of energy, length and width, as we absorb energy in the direction of motion, reproducing and storing cells in the ‘fat’ dimension of width that merges both, Sp X Tƒ dimensions of space-time.

Thus both, energy ‘sheets’ and ‘informative antennae’ are bidimensional, perceived by human senses as a duality of motion-stillness (Galileo’s Paradox). So the 1st dimension is length or speed; the 2D are a moving plane or sheet of information as this page is; the 3rd is a volume or rotating body, which moves through the 4th dimension, treated as space in Relativity (a world line). Finally*, an organism in 5D seems ‘still’ but within it all cells and particles are performing complex cycles of energy and form.*

Moreover we observe that *as each more complex action includes the previous ones,* each ‘bigger dimension’ includes the previous ones. So the line includes the point; the plane, the line; the volume the plane and the world-cone the plane. Thus we write in dynamic terms the Generator, as a feedback equation of fluxes of energy and information between 2 poles, ∑Sp∆-1<=>∏ ∆, that create 5 Diffeomorphic, fractal, Space-Time Dimensions.

*5 diffeomorphic dimensions=åctions create a Generator Equation any being maximizes: Max. ∑Sp x ∏Tƒ.*

It describes the 3±∆ åctions all systems perform: gauging information, Tƒ, feeding on energy, ∑Sp, reproducing both, x, and evolving socially as parts of bigger scales.

So *4 parameters suffice to describe all systems in terms of its åctions:*

But mechanist science ignores the 3 topological ages of space-time organisms and its social, scalar evolutions between its informative births and entropic deaths, because it fails to understand the organic whys its mathematical equations describe. As scientific equations are mere varieties of the Fractal Generator and its 4 functions. They represent the 4 vital åctions common to all species of space-time. Thus in each of those scientific scales 4 functional equations express the energetic, informative, reproductive and social åctions that suffice to describe the existence of each species.

4 Vital Dimensions explain the existence of light-space: the wide, energetic, magnetic field; the tall, informative, electric field; the reproductive, long wave speed, calculated as the product of its electric and magnetic field and its frequency colors, which are societies of photons.

4 Maxwell equations describe all the åctions of an electric field. 4 quantum numbers describe all the åctions of particles: the first number explains its energy level; the second number, its feeding & perceptive gauging; the 3^{rd} spin number shows its chances of reproducing new particles with a particle of opposite sexual spin; the 4^{th} magnetic number shows the social distribution of its atomic organism. 4 type of vibrations organize a social molecule. 4 nucleotide acids code the vital åctions of the cell. And 4 drives of existence -feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially- explain the game of life, which now mankind finally understands, just before she ends her existence.

So be humble, you are nothing, just a 10 dimensional being, an infinitesimal soul who looked at the infinite Universe, a variety of the 4 symbols of the fractal generator, who denied the meaning of existence confused itself with the whole, and now will die dust of space-time.

Since only the Universe, and its soul, the fractal generator of infinite existences is eternal.** @…** monads are minds composed of a max. still form or linguistic singularity and a cyclical time membrane, connected through invaginations. It is the ‘invisible’ central command of the being, which perceives the Universe’s timespace cycles and stop its motion through a mirror image in the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’, which *then* reflect its back ordering reality as it converts its motions into ‘@ctions’…

So we study the form of the monad in space as a linguistic mirror.

**The larger view. All the motions of social organisms.**

In that regard, lineal time and physics and its single motion-entropy arrow of time, is *completely misleading with his astounding overgrown at the center of time analysis the understanding of time and space in all other sciences, which are far more concerned with the MOTIONS OF INFORMATION, THE TOPOLOGIES OF SPACE AND THE PROCESSES OF WHOLES AND PARTS.*

Time is all, all is motion, present space being a slice of time, which physicists study with ∂t->0 instants. So it reduces time-motion to v=∂s/∂t. Now we ad information and the mixture of both, energetic, reproductive iterations and the scales of the ∆-Universe… to obtain all *the motions of the Universe.*

And indeed, if humans could stop so much bull$hit and worship and belief (of physics or rather of the machines and weapons they reproduce), they would be soo obvious, as they are to me:

There are different motions of time, of which we shall consider 5, according to the existence of the 4 ∆@st elements, which again ONLY can give birth to ±4 motions in the inverse directions of ∆, @, S, and T, where the ‘2 Ðimotions of mind’ and its processes of perception, will merge the CLASSIC LIST OF 6 MOTIONS defined by Aristotle.

Indeed, again in this world of mechanisms and digital censorship, it seems nobody has read Aristotle on time and motion. He *knew more in that sense of the nature of time motions that Mr. Einstein, and i say this knowing it is a blasphemy for most, because it is TRUTH. EINSTEIN KNEW ALL OF LOCOMOTION, 1/5TH of it. Not good enough.*

Why 5 instead of 6? Because he did subdivide some, as in the fractal Universe ultimately every element can be sub-divided as a fractal organism in itself (fractal principle of ‘pentalogic’. The question is rather, how Aristotle could understand them so well and yet didn’t use them further in its analysis of logic thought, shaping an hexalogic of the Universe?

Basically Aristotle rightly understood that perception is stillness, as all systems have ‘an unmoved central God (of which he saw ∞, famously exclaiming ‘we are all gods’), which moves as final cause all the energy around it (its body-waves). So he did not consider perception a motion, but as the lack of it. But in a wider view, it is precisely the ‘change’ of motion from entropy through body-waves to arrive to still ‘minds’, what we shall call here the arrow of pure information, or anti-motion of the mind. And its inverse arrow: the communication of information, which so often *puts in motion through its orders the beings around the hierarchical knot-mind at the center of the system.*

Thus the GST division of all the actions of existence as motions=changes in timespace was foreseen by Aristotle, who talked of 6 motions and considered perception of information, from a mind-point of view, god and prime mover of the territorial energy it surrounds it. As such the so much despised Aristotle, turned out to be a more important philosopher of time than Mr. Einstein and Galileo who only studied one of the 5 time motions, locomotion (motion in space).

We can in this manner formalize all his motions translated to 5D as:

-∆±¡: **Growth and diminution:** reproduction 3D-ST, and old age warping and entropy

– §ð<<$t: **Decay**(4D-entropy)

-$t:2D **Locomotion**: ± displacement in S-dimensional coordinates & Reproduction: motion into an adjacent form of space-time.

-∆¡: 4D: **Generation** (evolution) and Dissolution: Motions in +∆¡

-§ð: 1D: **Perception** and emission of information, inward motion of pixels that stop into a synchronous still mapping of reality.

It is worth to notice that:

0. Aristotle and those earlier philosophers, prior to the simplification of Galileo understood that all forms of change were motions, of which the main categories were motion of form, of in/form/ation studied by biological sciences and motion as translation in space, studied by physics, without significant change in the form, (hence easy to manipulate mathematically with derivatives, reason why it expand so much in the modern age). If we were to overblow lineal derivative time and locomotion at most we could say that lineal time is the SHORT TIME SPAN OF DERIVATIVE PRESENTS, AND INFORMATIVE, EVOLUTIONARY, BIOLOGICAL TIME IS THE LONG RANGE, FROM PAST TO FUTURE TO PAST OF WORLDCYCLES OF INFORMATION, WHICH REQUIRE ALL OTHER MOTIONS=CHANGES TO BE DEFINED SCIENTIFICALLY, FORMING together the ”series of a world cycle of time-space’:

T-1: Generation (evolution): ∑St-1=∆1: Growth and emergence: ±∆•T: PERCEPTION & communication-> ∆St->Locomotion… and then the species will repeat once and again those last 4 motions, in cyclical modular form, feeding on energy and growing, perceiving and moving towards fields of energy, or towards fields of similar beings, with which it can communicate information; till the world cycle reaches its zenith and starts its decline with the negative arrows of -∆St, diminution, and – ∆+1<<∆-1 final dissolution and death.

So this is the a priori fact of motions in space-time. And from them we can extract some fundamental properties of the motion of the Universe.

1. All* motions are combined motions in which several elements of ∆•ST intermarry. However for each of those dualities there is an element that dominates. In growth and diminution the scalar element, in locomotion and reproduction, the spatial element, in generation and death, the temporal evolutionary trans-formative element; and in mind’s motions, the informative element. We can in that sense further on reduce the 4 first motions, (growth, diminutions, locomotion and **reproduction) to ∆space-like equations and the other 4, to time-informative equations.*

*2. All the motions are dual, ±, hence balancing each other to total a zero sum or worldcycle of conservative present in an immortal Universe made of eternal motion with form.So all motions can be considered elements of the Worldcycle of Existence and its different temporal phases.*

3. L*ocomotion, the only motion studied by physics, and hence the queen of all motions, is just a reproductive motion; where little information is reproduced (wave-particle duality); while as we grow in scales of the 5th dimension and wholes require more information, the slow down of motion and growth of informative replication increases. So when we reproduce as humans the motion is minimal (9 months of informative reproduction inside the mother, and a small final motion to emerge in the adjacent region of space-time).*

4. Finally the study of those motions, considered here qualitatively *is closely related to the different Constants of Action, which is the quantitative version of the same processes.*

5. While its full formalization by the ¬Æ formalism of General Stiences is immediate thanks to the awesooome insights of one of my few idols of classic science, Mr. Galois the young r=evolutionary, who realized *the key element of reality is the symmetry of all ‘trans-form-ations’ (motions with a change of information) of reality. We shall add, along the bidirectional arrows of each ∆•ST relative dimension of being.*

*So only those systems and groups that generate allowed symmetries and motions along ∆, @, S & T do exist – are solvable. *

Group theory is thus a synoptic way to explain the Γ ‘Generator of Symmetries’, as the ∆st being in ‘reproductive flows, though the symmetries of its dimensions. As it divides those motions, roughly into:

-‘S-Abelian, space-like motions’ (which are equal in both directions), the minority of them, mostly locomotions and reproductive motions that iterate a system and…

-‘T Non-abelian, informative changes’ across T directions, (which are not changeable motions, as moving forwards in ccyclical time is the arrow of life and moving backwards the arrow of death).

-While ∆motions are of two types:

∆±i: motions that ‘cross’ a discontinuity between full planes of existence; which are TIME-like. For example, motions through world cycles, or inverse motions of information and entropy.

§: social grouping within a plane, (10ˆ<10), which are space-like motions as we can eliminate or ad members till the limits of creation of a new plane that emerges as a whole. Hence they are exchangeable §-motions of social scales.

What of those 3 elements, dimensions, motions or actions matter most? Obviously actions, as they combine ALL the elements of reality, dimension, motion and scale. So we can say as Planck realized a century ago that the unit of reality is an action, but unlike Physicists who basically study only an action (the first, locomotion) we shall consider a more complex pentagonal Universe of 5 different active dimotions.

When we order those ‘dimotions’ in space we get a superorganism,when we order them in time we obtain a worldcycle of existence, when we order them in scales, we obtain the 5 actions of all systems that absorb energy from its lower ∆-2 scale (humans absorb amino acids), information from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb light), motion from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb gravitation) or simplex actions, while developing two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution from its higher, ∆-1 seminal scale, ∆o scale and ∆+1 social scale.

*Actions are thus the FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE of the limits of perception of any ∆ø and relate directly ‘perception’ and ‘stientific’ knowledge to the relative position of the mind that perceives. They are also the essential element to fully grasp WHY we perceive only a limit number of scales of reality with us at the center: namely because we ‘HAVE THOSE ∆±¡ practical limits in our actions’ – NOT because there are NO more scales above or below.*

It is also important to realize that actions are either predatory (those involving smaller beings), equalitarian (reproduction with an ∆ø equal form) or submissive to the ∆+1 social world. We are, as Shakespeare put it, buffoons citizens or kings depending of our perspective.

So in this post we shall introduce briefly the model from the home page and then talk a bit of each of the 5 D³imotions (dimension, motions and action) of reality, which in the future will be the main method of study of beings, to understand its structure in space (dimensions of the superorganism) its worldcycle in time (ordered as sequential motions by the symmetry S=T) and combined use for the program of survival – the program of its 5 actions.

IN THE GRAPH, we see the five dimensions of reality, 3 of present organic ensembles of beings, two in scales of lower smaller parts and larger wholes. They are symmetric to the 3±1 ages of a world cycle between its 1D generation as a seed that evolves socially into a whole and its 5D entropic death:

**THE ORDER OF THE 5 DIMOTIONS IN ALL SYSTEMS: FROM PERCEPTION TO LOVE.**

An *essential theme that is often ‘hidden’ by the multiplicity of jargons of all disciplines, is the ‘guidance’ of the survival program and the priority between the 5 Dimotions, which explain a ginormous number of phenomena and ‘changes’ on the steps and actions of a beings, which goes as follows:*

All systems perceive at the bottom of the pyramid, hence perception contrary to belief is the less desired of all dimotions – no motion at all.

Then the system will move through locomotion towards a field of energy in which to feed, by perpendicularity. So motion is the second hierarchical action, and feeding on perpendicular energy the third.

This leaves the complex reproductive, ‘mirror symmetry’ and social love as the most desired, yet more difficult to achieve goals of existence, in the proper Maslow pyramid:

And this applies to the choices that a given object will make in its ‘modular’ change of actions.

For example, the perpendicular repulsion that two electrons suffer ‘afraid’ of cancelling its wave-forms (Pauli exclusion principle) breaks in Cooper Pairs of superfluidity, when their inverse spins entangle into a ‘couple’ by chiral mirror symmetry. It is essentially the arrow of reproduction, as two entangled spins with enough energy can reproduce bosons and even other fermion. Yet this might be broken by the ‘penetration of a magnetic field, which will put into a social conjunction all the electrons.

Thus what a mechanical view of the Universe deems absolute (the repulsion between electrons) is broken first by the complementary mirror symmetry of Cooper pairs, and then further on by the social co-evolution under a magnetic field.

Yet the choice between couple pairing and social network often is contradictory, so women prefer the coupling through mirror symmetry, but sterile men prefer the social gathering of larger numbers. So happen in the previous example in which the cooper pairing produces a superficial constant current that expels the magnetic field (Meissner effect). Its mathematical description being the how of the deeper how of its hierarchy range between Ðimotions of existence.

Thus the two social reproductive arrows however are often exclusive and so we find sexual reproduction and clone reproduction, mirror symmetry in dissimilar forms and social evolution in identical forms with minimal asymmetry (notably spheres and points, which become indistinguishable elements of a network or Plural ‘nuclei’ of a wave).

It is then necessary to make use of the laws of existential algebra that define all the relationships between Ðimotions of space-time, even if they might seem abstract, as they are the realization of the hierarchies between Ðimotions born of the survival program of the Universe, which we repeat is NOT absolute mechanical as many physicists pretend but must be put on the context of each local symmetry.

**The simplest generator equation.**

** **Let us consider then with the simplest possible symbols of Non-Æ Logic (the advanced formalism needed to describe the more complex space and time), a logic equation of the ternary space-time topological forms=functions of all ‘organisms’ of the Universe:

≥: iterative, reproductive, hyperbolic networks that become body waves, as the hyperbola has all the shapes within it to reproduce the whole being.

| ≈: Flat planes of lineal parallel networks of ‘fractal points’ that become limbs/fields of maximal entropic motions as the line/plane is the fastest distance between two points.

O: Informative, implosive ‘neuronal networks that become cyclical spherical particles-heads that process information as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space.

So the simultaneous ensemble of ‘networks of cellular/atomic/organic herds’ into those 3 differentiated functions=forms which therefore extends across to ∆ø and ∆-1 scales, within the ∆+1 world in which the ternary network/system exists is what we call a super organism.

So we write with those symbols fa Generator Equation of T.œs.

*$t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) ≤iterative body-wave≥ §ð (still mind form or world)*

The ginormous quantity of consequences, detailed and laws derived from that simple formula being made of those 3 topologies would fill up when study in its details – all the beings and super organisms of reality and its ternary parts – an entire galactic encyclopedia.

So in this very brief introduction we shall consider onlythe most remarkable consequence in the simplest level of understanding of it – the ternary principles of conservation of physics that correspond to the 3 parts of all systems.

*Each of those vital topologies would require an entire post and encyclopedia to fully analyze the marriage of mathematics and organic existence.*

*Let us now consider the most important of them, the cyclic/spheric form.* Its vital function is to process in-form-ation, memorial form. And so it is cyclic, spherical for two reasons: A sphere has maximal volume in minimal space, ensuring the ‘still, informative’ system to process maximal information and disguise with minimal exposure. But most important memorial in-form-ation is cyclical because* TO RETURN TO A POINT, THE SHORTEST PATH IS A CYCLE. *

*So cycles impose their form in all kind of Universal structures which ‘conserve’, ‘memorize’ and reproduce the information of its external world and the information of its internal existence (as in the conserved cycles of energy).*

The full formalism of a **T**heory of the **O**rganic **E**verything or whole and its **T**ime§pace **Œ**rganisms (T.œ), its fractal parts, should be made departing from a description of its 5 Ðimotions in simultaneous space that describes the system as a super organism, in 3 fractal ∆±¡ planes, in a static, ‘structural space-like form’ through ¬Æ: Existential algebra and in a ‘time-like dynamic flow as it is generated by a singularity mind-seed of information which will grow, evolve into 3 networks, emerge as a whole, trace its worldcycles between birth and extinction in the external world through actions of exchange of energy and information, aging till a point in which all its energy will be exhausted and it will collapse, in an entropic explosion of death.

We call the analysis of its 5 Dimotions in abstract as adjacent topologies of a super organism or in vital terms as ‘actions’; the Rashomon effect, since we study as in the famous film 5 different points of view or elements through which the being expresses itself. And we call the study of its world cycle through the entire life-death existence of the being the Disomorphic method as we study the defining elements of the whole process of life, from its palingenetic generation of a seed that will become a ‘mind’ of a territory of external world and internal ternary physiological control of its ‘brother cells/atoms/citizens’, to fully create a super organism that will live and die again through those 5 Dimotions.

Those 2 approaches together, the space-like and the time-like define the super organism and its worldcycle in a far more complex and rich manner than the previous 4D formalism of Mr. Einstein did with its single analysis of only one time arrow, the worldline or locomotion; which from this far richer and meaningful analysis of Times seems rather a childish exercise compared to our full blown complex extraction of all the information about a being and its worldcycle of existence.

*The 5 Dimotions*

Let us then start considering how the 5 Dimotions of timespace, locomotion; its inverse, information, its combination, hyperbolic iterative, reproductive waves, and its lower disordered planes of death, entropy (max. scattering, disordering motion) an organic upper, entangled wholes (5ht dimension of social evolution of discontinuous parts into wholes) define the entangled organic Universe, and why HUMANS do NOT perceive it as such due both to a historic limited evolution of the discipline, and the embedded egocy of man, who gauges information from its point of view, hence deforming its perspective, thinking of himself, the center of it all.

The i-logic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.

That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…

The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.

So they said the Universe is dying and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPY-scattering motions-death aka weapons.

But there are 3 more ARROWS of time, modes of change, which are THE POSITIVE, CREATIVE, INFORMATIVE, SOCIAL, LOVING ARROWS not the 2 simple, destructive negative, arrows of motion and entropy which they DO study: 3) information 4) reproduction 5)social love, the highest of them.

THE UNIVERSE REINFORCES THE PROGRAM OF THE 5 ARROWS OF TIME with SENSATIONS the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (ARROW of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).

**The super organism, as an entangled system…**

in which the 5 elements of the being scales, time, space, minds, and all together as an entropic ∆@st are in constant creative trans-formation.

The ¡logic of the 5Ð³isomorphic fractal Universe is kaleidoscopic, pentagonal, which given the fact that each non-E point-monad is merely @ristotelian, with a single A->B logic, it makes rather difficult to explain it. So we shall try, and to that effect we shall use an ¡logic concept, the ‘Rashomon effect’.

What all this means is that the 5 elements of reality, Space, Time, scales, minds and *the entropic destruction of them all, ARE NOT isolated elements but all of them are entangled, perceiving each other in kaleidoscopic forms. *

The metric of the 5 Ðimotions of time§paces has properties that are entangled albeit expressed in different manners by the different languages that perceive them. The 5 Dimotions differ topo-logically, as both its geometry in motion (topology in space) and logic causality in time is different. For example a Darwinian event implies the cutting through perpendicular geometries tearing the variety of our topological organs, predated; an act of communication requires on the other hand a parallel motion to allow communication at equal distances of the subtle, ∆-3 pixels an ∆º mind uses to that aim.

When we study the actions of survival across scales, their functions and perspective also differs from the sadistic ministrations we make to the oysters we ‘love’ to torture with lemon to the view the oyster terrified will have in its inner point of view of the monster that eats her alive; and finally in the last layer of reality, perception itself of sensations that reinforce the program of actions, it is a different sensation of exhilarating pleasure an entropy action, that the acute pain of informative knowledge of truth, or the pressure-pain associated to the social evolution into choking herds that inflict order upon us.

All those layers of reality are related to the four elements of the being, its space, its time, its scale and its mind, which provide simultaneous, topological; sequential-logic; sensorial, perceptive and organic biological ± prey-predator scalar elements to all functions of existence.

However as we are representing here the 5 ðimotions of existence in terms of logic thought and structures, which will be of great usefulness to discuss logic questions of algebra and existential thought, certainly the view of this article will deal in I-logic terms with our new symbology.

Lets us then briefly define them in the sequential order in which a cycle of exist¡ence happens as we perceive i-nformation to move a-ccelerating towards a field of feeding e-nergy, which will be used to reproduce o-rganically an o-ffspring of similar forms and evolve socially to u-nite into a u-niversal whole…

And each of those actions will be related to all others, in the entangled Universe provoking:

**5 e-motions.** So when we talk of information and perception, it is of 5-varieties related to each of the 5 elements of reality, which we define with 5 e-motions, each for one sensorial perception of the other 4 elements: Reproductive pleasure, acute perception, eusocial love, destructive hate, exhilarating motion… all those perceptions and its subtle variations are ultimately the ways in which the I-nformative Ðimotion sees the other ones.

The element which seems more difficult to introduce within the entangled multi-property Universe is under the ego paradox of restricting e-motions to human existence, that final level of sensations, which in the new terminology that tries to show the entangled relationship of all elements are to be called e-motions.

Initially I wanted to use e-moticons for them and generally I would consider it, if they were available for this keyboard. Then we could talk of 5 e-motions, parallel to the 5 Ðimotions, parallel to the 5 logic suits, parallel to the 5 aeiou actions and 5 topological dimensions and 5 time motions and 5 organic functions… of exist¡ence. They are though only available in hotmail. So they would be, as taken from hotmail’s list, providing 2 and explaining them:

😇,, **O>:** : for the fifth e-motion of social love. They both have the ˆ, of ascension to the fifth dimension.

😈, **(<: ** For the fourth e-motion of entropy. Obviously the exhilaration of entropy, which however destroy us needs a devil e-moticon.

😳, ** O-: ** For the 1st e-motion of stopping information. Information stops for perception, opens your eyes, it is though not happy, often painful. S

😍, **Ø=:** For the 3rd e-motion of reproduction. Love symbols or converging ones >< as those are the ¡-logic symbols for happy reproduction.

😎, **|-:** For the second e-motion of locomotion, the most stupid of all Ðimotions, mechanical and mindless – so the higher function of thought – the eyes, are somehow lost.

It follows for those who don’t have the nice yellow emoticons, we can use the hand ones.

**5 loco-motion**s. From the lack of it, in the **i**nformative **stop**, to the **steady** ** locomotion**, to the **decelerating** motion of **entropic** dissolution, to the** SHM**, back and forth motions of **reproductive** actions, to the **accelerated** inwards motions of** social evolution** into a TIGHTER higher whole.

As all is connected and all is entangled the variations of events and forms born of the 5 elements or rather 3 ±¡ (given the clear oppositions between entropic actions and social evolutionary ones; between locomotions and information; whereas only reproduction in present seems to bring the 5 dimotions together) at a logical level the best way to express reality is through those oppositions:

4 vs. 5: Decelerating Entropic, 4th dimotions vs. Accelerating Social, evolutionary 5th Ðimotions. We can consider such oppositions to be the most extreme of reality hence we use the concept of antisymmetry for them, symbolized by the ‘warrior’ symbol of ♠ for entropy and the ♥ symbol for social evolution.

1 vs. 2: Stop, informative perception vs. Lineal locomotion. We consider such relationships to be alternate as in the processes of stop and go, perception and motion that are common to locomotion when fully understood as a combination of ‘form and motion’ (wave length and frequency). So the level of opposition is not so extreme and it is NOT a single event so often destroying its ‘repetitive nature’, and as such we can consider them disymmetric and use the suit of diamonds♦, to represent it.

3: Reproduction, *which includes in its complex form the other 4 Ðimotions. And so we need a combined mixture of all those processes. *

The concepts of entropic deceleration, social acceleration, static position for information, steady motion for locomotion, and its full combination for reproduction would be in physical terms, the most proper way to describe the 5 Ðimotions, as *states of motion in themselves.*

**5 Iterations.** As inflationary languages reproduce infinite views of the same Universe, locomotions happen as adjacent reproduction of the being which repeats its in-formation as it moves, reproduction proper implies a motion in the 5th dimension from seed to whole, and entropic reproduction is the mirage of expansion in space of the being which however looses its inner connections till it explodes, and finally social evolution requires first a clone reproduction to form with those equal parts a whole.

**5 Entropic extinctions**; of the pixels we absorb and ‘stop’ to perceive them as ‘corpses’ of a mapping; of the ‘fuel’ we need to move; of the ¡-2 elements we break down to reproduce our variety of forms, and viceversa, as death is a dual destruction down to scales of the fifth dimension ¡º<<¡-2; while social evolution of the whole destroys the freedom of its parts…

**5 Social evolutions. Finally **a mapping of information is the social evolution of the pixel stopped in the mind, a locomotion is a series of adjacent reproductive memorial tails of the being fading fast away in lineal fashion, a reproduction requires a palingenetic clone evolution of parts into wholes back and forth from the ∆-1 plane, while entropy is the inverse of social evolution, and twice the social evolution of a beings is its emergence as a super organism, a humind that becomes a prophet cloned in the mind of believers to emerge as a social whole, a star that evolves into a black hole mind of the galaxy and so on…

A better way to cast the connection between the 5th Ðimotion and reality though is to establish 5 clear forms of social organization, combination of the previous 4 elements with the element of social evolution: a **language**, which is the social representation of the whole by the 1st Ðimotion of the **mind; ** a ** herd, **which has its main purpose as a wave of the 2nd Ðimotion of** locomotion; an ecosystem i**n which the 4th Ðimotion of** entropic **darwinian processes take place, an **organism, **whichis the evolution of the** 3rd reproductive Ðimotion** and a super organism, which is an organism of organisms, the 5th natural form that ‘tops’ all the possible states and processes of existence, coming therefore the conclusion that with the concept of a supœrganism all other concepts Ðimotions and its combinations can be cast.

The entanglement of all those layers of reality is so profound it cannot be cast on the usual systems of thought of the humind, so we are becoming creative with the language: **5 e-motions** correspond to the pentagonal logic of sensations of the **mind**; and are the basis of a psychological stience.** 5 loco-motions** correspond to the 2nd Ðimotion s**tudied by physics**. ** 5 iterations** correspond to the **3rd Ðimotion of reproduction; 5 extinctions **to the modes of entropy, and 5 **evolutions to the 5 forms of social organization.**

We can then create a ¬Æ topological stience of the ‘variations’ of composite dimotions similar to the topological stience of varieties of complex manifolds, which is of great use and we shall apply extensively in the 3rd and fourth line to the understanding of the different variations of species – which in fact is a process of combinations of ternary simplex topologies in different hierarchical orders.

Of the 5 Ðimotions the less accepted by the egocy paradox is the most important – the will of the mind and its program of existence carried by its 5 e-motions, likely associated closed to the sensation of the 5 locomotions with the mind uses to perceive existence.

We shall deal with those processes though in this post with a composite approach that will put in relationship the behavior produced by those e-motions and the geometry and outcome of relationships, both destructive and constructive according to topology.

So indeed the Universe is a pentagonal kaleidoscopic fractal self-repetitive interactive entangled ilogic existential form of a higher logic than that of man.

All this allow us to study in simultaneous entangled view any system as a pentagonal island-universe.

So all systems of the Universe ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles. Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.

In the graphs, we observe the obvious: physical systems do obey the same laws that biological ones because their ultimate elements, particles follow the 5 dimotions=vital actions of all systems in ‘exi=stience’ and this happens because a system that doesn’t gauge information for his particle/head, moving entropically over a disordered ‘larger’ plane, as it displaces towers a field of energy for its iterative body wave; using the extra energy to reproduce its form into a clone system does NOT survive.

So regardless of nature all systems must ‘automatically’ perform those 4 arrows of timespace to exist (the number of synonymous words, dimotions, vital actions, timespace arrows, dimensional forms, we use are many but all mean the same – a combination of motion and form with a vital function that ensures the program of survival of the being).

So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic code but only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.

DEATH is the needed error of the Universe NOT desired by the program.

For that reason it lasts only a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time IS for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom/individual’ of its lower, ∆-¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).

So you die in a second, your relative time-clock quanta the time of 1 thought=glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your body-heart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is life-lasting…

Same with the conundrum of antiparticles (entropy=death arrow of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around. Death is the shortest possible arrow.

This is LEIBNIZ: ‘THE UNIVERSE is the most perfect of all worlds possible’.

Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.

ALL THIS SAID, there is a huge other field of analysis of time-space, called Evolution, founded by Darwin which deals with the changes in the information of beings. Why?

Because indeed, besides the previously analyzed dimotions of locomotion, origin of relativity, and entropy, latter considered in more detail as the synonymous of death and dissolution, (which physicists also merely describe mathematically and confuse with the motion of gases, so we shall work that theme on the sections of physical laws), there are 3 more ARROWS of time, modes of change, which are THE POSITIVE, CREATIVE, INFORMATIVE, SOCIAL, LOVING ARROWS not the 2 simple, destructive negative, arrows of motion and entropy which they DO study: 3) information 4) reproduction 5)social love, the highest of them.

**The 5 Dimotions of timespace as actions of existence. **

Existential algebra studies the STeps of each Ðimotion of space-time, which originate the feed back equation: S≤≥T of steps of space time, that move reality from the ST-Entropy of the Past into the ƒð<<e and through death back into the original steps.

How we move in space-time means how we exist as both things are equated. Steps of motion are always transformations from spatial elements to temporal events back and forth, and so steps that are possible in principle are simply 3:

S> T, T< S , S.=S and T = T. THOSE ARE THE first dimotions and with those four elements we can start to describe across the feed back equation,

S≤≥T

*all the Steps of all the dimotions of exist¡ence.*

The i-logic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.

That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…

The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.

So they said the Universe is dying and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPY-scattering motions-death aka weapons.

YET THE opposite is truth: the universe constantly strifes to increase its social evolution and emerge in the 4th Dimension of social love.

In that single plane the being, which acquired its maximal perfection as form of information in its seed-genetic-memetic-prophetic-quantum particle state (biologic, sociologic, physical systems) will now try to evolve further into its ∆+1 social world. But there mostly will play a shorter game of existence (in a relative slower time speed) called life that ends in the fourth dimension, entropic death, as *hardly any form of reality is able to keep ascending the scales of the fifth dimension.*

So basically huminds fearing the fifth dimension (or loving it in the case of physicists whose worldly profession is to make entropic weapons, and hence have created multiple entropy-only theories of reality), consider only the 3 ages≈spatial dimensions of topological beings but without the proper analysis of its S=t symmetries do not fully grasp its two fundamental structures a super organism in simultaneous space made of |-lineal limbs/potentials < Ø-reproductive bodywaves>O-particles heads, and its 3 ages of life, as *the order in simultaneous space of those 3 systems is different from its wordlcycle order; as the reproductive body-wave is ‘between the lineal limb-fields (1D) and its ‘coiling into a cyclical motion (2D particle-head).*

*It is then self-evident that the order of those 3 present dimensions, lineal motion, cyclical motion and wave-like motion is multiple giving birth to many different events and formal organisms. And from this realisation comes the big question about the 5D entropy and inverse 1,4D **generational and social dimotions: can we invert their order? *

So most systems have its maximal form in the seed o-1 temporal state. Even if ALL minds WOULD LIKE THE order to be the opposite and grow always in information without death and entropy, which IS NOT what we observe in the real world.

# ∆º: Worldcycles.

THE main order in time is the world cycle, which *unfortunately starts in the lower scale of faster time speed, which becomes ordered till emerging in the upper scale, but then is all going down, into the 4th dimension of death… So the arrow of entropy reigns in each of the scales alone, but the arrow of information BETWEEN SCALES IN THE 0-5 CYCLE, alpha and omega of all those existences.*

Its study is the fundamental form of knowledge possible in the Universe. But we say all time motions have a spatial symmetric form. What is the symmetric form in space of the world cycle of time? The super organism, the fundamental simultaneous form of reality. Below we show that symmetry for a human being.

**Travels through the fifth dimension.**

For a dimension of space-time to exist, an entity must be able to travel through it, while its space-time parameters remains co-invariant.

In words of Klein, one of the discoverers of Non-E Geometry:

‘A Geometry is the study of the (co)invariant properties of a space(time), under motions within itself’ (Klein).

Since it is precisely the co-invariance of both parameters what allows ‘species’ to travel through those scales and exchange energy and information through them without the system and the dimensions to ‘become unstable’.

So how we travel through the 5th dimension? Simply moving through it in the life-death cycle of existence:

Let us then define with those simple principles of existential beings its most important equation… the…

**5≈3±1 ages of ðime§paœs**

‘To be or not to be, that is the question’ * Shakespeare, on the function of ðime§pace existence.*

“For you are ∆ºst (of ðime§pace). And to ∇ûst you shall return.” *Genesis, on the world cycle of ðime§pace existence.*

‘ΓºΔ is the seer of ðime’ Saint Augustine; *on the program of ðime§pace existence.*

‘ðime§pace Energy is conserved in all zero-sum ωorldcycles between birth and extinction in which a ðime§pace being trans-forms back and forth its entropy into information: *Eω≈∫exi=st*‘. Principle of Conservation of the 3 arrows of ðime§pace. Function of exi=st¡ence.

*Sancho on the ωorldcycle of all ∆ºST beings *

We can now switch analysis from *the spatial, synchronous view of ðime§pace cycles/arrows as organic parts of systems, into the temporal, sequential order, as ðime-ages of a world cycle of existence.*

It must be noticed that humans tend to confuse (and so the error translates in many pages of our blogs, from an earlier age in which I tried to explain a simplified model of the world cycle):

-Spatial Entropy (ab. $pe), pure disordered motion that expands §pace and dissolves form, and energy, when that motion starts to acquire form – so the equation of energy is a vector with a clear define direction in its motion, given by the form that moves.

-Pure cyclical ðime-like form (third image) with in-form-ation, which is form-in-action, the intermediate state in which form acquires some motion to be transferred.

So, the worldcycle’s equation is as follows:

-∆-1: birth as a seed of pure form in a lower scale->which emerges in the new scales in a youth of entropic motions, which soon starts to learn how to ‘form’ entropy into energy growth -> maturity when energy becomes shaped into information and the system reproduces -> old age when information dominates till the system becomes still-> entropy age or age of death, when the system returns to the ∆-1 scale.

In the next graph, the Universe is a fractal of 3 topological motions of ðime§pace; Entropy, information and its combined momentums, which integrate into a closed, zero sum energetic worldcycle. Thus the study of the world cycles of ðime§pace and its 3 motions encodes the meaning of all ‘exi=st¡ences’ acronym for the fundamental equation or ‘generator of fractal ðime§pace, e x i = st, which each ‘stience’, st-udies by studying the ðime§pace beings of a certain scale of size of the fractal Universe:

So we talk in space of the super organism as the fundamental particle of the 5D Universe and in time of the world cycle of life and death as its fundamental event – whereas the worldlines of 4D models restricted to a single plane of space-time are the limit of the 5D formalism for a single spacetime continuum; which fail to describe those organic properties happening in 3 co-existing scales, since all forms of reality are born as a seed of information, emerging a larger super organisms in a larger world, to finally after 3 ages of growing information, collapsing back into a 3rd age of warping, which exhausts the energy of the system, provoking a time reversal into entropic big-bang local deaths:

Amazing as it seems the Universe as only 3 topological varieties, which therefore correspond to the previous 3 forms. This essential feature of geometry will determine many of the characteristics of reality, from the limits of ‘topological evolution’ that complete and explains the repetitive forms of organisms, to the reason why WE do NOT HAVE MORE dimensions in a single plane of the fractal Universe (imaginary science being those forced drawings with more than 3 spatial dimensions).

In the graph, using the minimum symbols of ∆@S≈T, < for a flow of entropy, > for a flow of information, ST for a present momentum, ∆, for the different scales of existence of the Universe, we map out its fundamental world cycles. The understanding of those world cycles, event in ðime, of a synchronous networks of clone beings or super organism in §pace, is the fundamental task of GST, the organic model of the fractal Universe.

The interesting fact *of those worldcycles is that they are again the product of a sequential order of the 5 Dimensions,* IN THIS CASE IN INVERSE FASHION, a fact we shall study with its deep philosophical implications in more detail.

∆-generation (4D:SOCIAL Evolution FROM SEED to emergent form of present>lineal youth (1D)>reproductive maturity (2D)>informative 3rd age (3D)>entropic death back to the past (5D).

THOSE ARE THE 5 MOTIONS-dimensions-arrows of time-space, now forming the life-death cycle of existence of all beings. Thus, without them and all its possible* symmetric relationships, that allow us to extract all its meanings together *we cannot make sense of any system,including physical systems, today observed mostly with a single one, ENTROPIC locomotions and its worldlines.

In that regard all physical and biological systems, ‘live and die’ as super organisms made of ∑atoms/cells that evolve through networks that transform Entropy into information (Life arrow) and then explode those information networks back into disconnected Entropy when they have exhausted it (death arrow) determines a sequential, existential life-death cycle invariant in all beings:

– ∆-1>∆º: 0-1 Dimension: *Generation: *Birth as a seed of information that evolves through a phetus that feeds on energy, reproduces and finally emerges, *realizing a first full trip through scales of the fifth dimension between its cellular/atomic/prophet and organic/crystal/cultural ‘whole’ emerging state.*

-Max. Motion x Min.Information: **2D** youth of external, LINEAL motions with maximal activity of its Sp-Limbs/potential fields.

**-3D:** Sp=ðƒ: Balanced, ‘classic’ age dominated by reproductive/communicative systems: hyperbolical waves and bodies.

The present-present, or steady state in the continuum is the longest, more efficient state and can be defined mathematically simply as Max. $p x ðƒ -> S=T, since both equations are related, as 4×4>5×2>6×1, the point of balance between Entropy and information is thus the maximal point of the equation of existence, the mature, re=productive age when the species reproduces its Entropy and information fully in other zone of §pace and ðime.

It is the desirable age to ‘stay for ever’ the immortal top predator point of the wave of existence of any species or individual or universal, Consider the classic definition of beauty in art, as a balance of forms, and indeed, we see the harmony and proportionality between form and size, the key dimensions of lineal and cyclical space, is the definition of classic beauty. And we will return to that, when observing that all forms of art can be reduced to 3, lineal, epic, energetic art, classic art, and baroque, informative, with an excess of form.

**3rd informative age/1ST Dimension. **As time passes and the present evolves into the future information dominates, energy exhausts itself, motion stiffens and the being looses its ‘time mobility’, becoming formal, wrinkled, warped, till all motion seems to cease, but as motion NEVER ceases only in the virtual mind… it changes finally direction *and abandons the present to dissolve in the relative past (a choice of our informative mind we by convention choose here as the future).*

It will be the **4th Dimension, the age of entropy.**

Now, in the larger analysis the ages of existence are obviously more as we have to count its two limits, the seminal age, ∆-1>∆º and the death and dissolution, its inverse ∆º>∆-1.

So we consider 5 AGES, common to all beings of Nature, in the 5th isomorphism common to all ‘exi=st¡ences’

Further on there is ‘§ixth’ unique age, very rare for those unique lives that REPEAT the process of creation of larger new scale of reality, i.e. prophets of social memes and religions, species who evolve into supœrganisms instead of being extinct; which ultimately explains why the Universe does have ∞ new scales of social organization.

As certain ‘perfect players of the game’, achieve not the ∆º<<∆-1 entropic death but a new ‘life’ in the ∆+1 scale, as the singularity mind-mirror of information, the particle-point ’emerges as the seed of the ∆+1 social scale’ instead of dying (prophetic thought, which creates a civilisation; black hole formation as the mind-venter of a galactic, ∆+1 scale for stars, etc.)

So, while we shall escape the miraculous emergence of a being after death into a higher social scale, in the third line, for the sake of comprehension we study 5 aging states: seed>youth>maturity>old age< extinction, to fully close a worldcycle.

Of those existential cycles, physicists consider that entropy objectively is the future as they see the organism of the Universe expanding, perhaps in a process of death as it was likely born of a seed of pure information that exploded into a reproductive radiation of ‘gala cells’ galaxies…

In the graph matter’s death by entropy: e=mcc happen in all scales. An interesting argument is to consider in which scale happens the big-bang, a local entropic background radiation measured locally for the galaxy, likely remnant of a quasar state. So ∆st favours after carefully studying data, that each galaxy-atom or gala cell – perspectives comparing it with other scales of similar space-time; has its big-bang cycle and the size of the wholeness of those gala-cells is not known, as we explain in our articles on cosmos and galaxies… so the hyperbolic ego of man has also reduced the size of the Universe and properly written its theory to look like he knows it all…

In any case whatever scale is the dark entropy underlying the galaxy at cosmic level, physical organisms and its 3 arrows of:

Entropy ≤c²(St)≥M(t) which form a physical system and can be broken in death, follow also the ternary ages of life.

So the creation of matter from plasma emerging s a whole also precedes its death in a birth of matter, which evolved socially the material system, and will at some time reproduce similar cycles of formation of matter. So while there is no end to the game of replications, the ego dies, and on top despite seeing time-information as the future, the mind is somehow orientated in inverse form to the entropy decadence and expansion of the body from youth to old age.

Amazingly enough with this simple scheme of 5 pentalogic elements, tracing 3 relative worldcycles, the first ‘placental worldcycle’ as it evolve in the relative safe ‘womb’ of a maternal system, the life cycle, as it tries to survive in an outer ecosystem, and for the most organized systems, a 3rd worldcycle as it forms part of a larger super organism, we will be able to order everything in the Universe, every event and every phenomena, which the researcher has studied for decades.

The existence of a new dimension of space-time is the most important discovery of science in a century, since Einstein formalized the fourth dimension, but this expansion and formal organization of science is much wider as it *applies to all sciences, not only physics. *

So we study further the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information and coordination of its citizens-cells.

So this is most important upgrade of spacetime theory since Einstein’s 4D formalism – which corresponds to the limit of 5D metrics in a single scale, that of the galatom’s light spacetime.

**The predictability of time-cycles.**

In the graph, the predictability of time-cycles can be done at 3 levels:

**S: Continuous, spatial pure mathematical**simple cycles, using calculus and derivatives, proper of mathematical equations; that of generational causal bio-logic cycles, often survival encounters between predators and prey.**T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns of sequential repetitive actions**, taking place at different times. AS THOSE ACTIONS ARE discontinuous, the patterns are LONGER in time.**∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of longer wholes,**species as opposed to individuals in biology, galactic, star or geologic life cycles as opposed to smaller life beings, which are longer BY VIRTUE of the 5th DIMENSIONAL METRIC, $ x ð = Cst (ab. C:st), which implies that from the smaller scalar perspective any longer cycle happening in the fifth dimension is much longer.

Because ‘human scientists’ ONLY recognize the first type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, and ignore the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their CAPACITY TO define the future is far more smaller than a ‘stientist’ that understands those 3 scales. So for a ‘stientist’ of ∆st, of which among humans there is the ginormous number of…1 (: me, I and myself 🙂 I can predict the future of any system including WITH DEEP TIME AND CYCLICAL PATTERNS, the future of social sciences, economics and history which I have been doing for 30 years as my small print books on the subject can testify:

An important question though must be clarified even if we go further into this specific post that introduces the 5 Dimensional motions of the Universe, which has to do with the ternary properties of the Universe as all is made of space, time and scale, and hence it has mathematical=spatial, logic=temporal and organic=scalar properties, *which unfortunately humans fail to recognize, as they have become specialized in ‘mathematical=spatial only properties’ due to the prominent role of physics and its digital machines of spatial measure in our systems of knowledge.*

*As it is impossible to make sense of reality if we do NOT include ALL THOSE PROPERTIES, as expressed previously in the 5 elements of reality.*

So in this blog we are making exact predictions of social sciences and prove it with 30 years of published books and papers far more exact than those of CIA, World Bank, and any think tank you might thought of, because we know the 3 LEVELS OF PREDICTABILITY OF TIME SYSTEMS. And all that uau! NOT with billions of dollars IN data, and AI machines to do IT, BUT my feeble, 1.5 kilograms of dirty water aka 1 brain, which has been doing it and handling it for free since the 90s, since I ended my Columbia u. master and started to churn self-paid small print books with predictions of history and economics that have been happening TO the letter.

Why I am NOT an AI machine as most people think I should be to forecast the future and solve the form in which the future of systems is GENERATED, has to do with a fact most scientists accustomed just to use data put in mathematical models FAIL to grasp about the fractal, organic Universe and its SCALES of ‘time-length’:

A system on the entangled fractal Universe has TOPO-BIO-LOGIC properties derived of its spatial, mathematical structure, its temporal, logic structure and ITS SCALAR, organic structure as parts co-exist into larger wholes and this gives the whole an organic structure.

As it happens, the MATHEMATICAL, topologic structure IS the shortest time span, as it is about SOCIAL NUMBERS, herds of equal forms that move in space, which is a slice of the whole time FLOW. AND SO mathematics is good for detail and spatial calculus which is what instantaneous derivatives do – but NOT for CHANGES OF age/phase, as derivatives cannot happen in points that have a fractal change.

So to the rescue come the LOGIC structure of the Universe, which studies time causality, between events and has a longer span. This logic structure is based in the CYCLICAL PATTERNS OF TIME clocks, which as your watch or any orbital day-year is cyclical and repeats in LONGER TIME FRAMES, so we can predict LONGER TIME FRAMES from the logic patterns of cyclical time.

And HERE human scientists ARE ALREADY AT LOSS, because since Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosion that destroy the information of reality stored in THOSE CYCLES OF TIME CLOCKS, its patterns and frequency, MANKIND CHANGED its cyclical understanding of time for a lineal time that SEEMS NOT TO REPEAT so they have MISSED its capacity to understand the cycles of time, of history and economics, with its OBTUSE lineal time models. And so they cannot EVEN CONCEIVE the predictability of economics and its SUBMISSIVE placebo democratic capitalist system where POLITICOS are ruled by companies ‘subventions’ and so do what is GOOD for the profits of economics according to the evolutionary patterns of machines. Which leads us to the THIRD level of DEEP TIME, that is, of the patterns of evolution of the Earth’s life species, including machines, as first mentioned by Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word superorganism for Gaia and deep time for the slower 5th dimensional clocks of larger organic systems.

THIS IS THE LEVEL OF DEEPER forecasting of time cycles, which I also use in my webs, but as humans stopped their understanding of time predictability in the first level of mathematical calculus, obviously they cannot understand what we do here.

Which leads to a final question: Why humans prefer a mechanical, mathematical simplex view of reality instead of embracing the whole? The answer might not be so much a problem of the Universe but of the human mind; as organisms are self-centered and select information from their point of view. So to be the center of the Universe is a survival strategy, which has made humans as they became over powerful on other organisms of Earth, reject a view of reality more objective, even today as machines clearly evolve into organisms, and we shall return to those themes, in our organic analysis of history and mathematical definition of the mind.

However a philosophy of science is a ‘thought experiment’ not a practical endeavor. So we care only for a profound ‘communion’ with the ultimate whys of reality, trying to understand the Universe as an entangled whole.

Indeed, the philosophy of systems science considering how timespace organisms follow similar laws. In that sense, the method of knowledge of the fractal, organic Universe is quite different from our present way of thought, which is analytic, and cheers the ‘cataloging’ of differences between beings – Systemics is a synthetic method and cheers the finding of similarities between them, extracting ‘disomorphic=equal laws’ .

Humans though embarked in a journey of ‘mechanical, mathematical’ dissection of reality which is fine but made them loose the forest view – and I dare to say most don’t even care anymore to know if they are looking at a forest at all.

The blog though only differentiates the ‘trees’ of the forest in the fourth line, which was meant to be a collaboration with a team of specialized scientists, each one casting his trees on the shadow of the ‘standard’ 12+1 set of ‘Disomorphic laws’ that define the common nature of all time-space organisms explained in the 3rd line (and briefly introduced in the next paragraphs).

As this collaborative effort has not happened the blog is incomplete.

Yet for those interested in the trees, the second line offers quite a ‘tree’ vision of the main sciences of the nested Universe departing from the largest one, the galatom, down to the smallest ones, the mind-languages stored in our infinitesimal neurons.

On my view, as Descartes put it when finishing his much briefer introduction to analytic Geometry on a book which he cherished more for his philosophy of science – as we do – but came to matter more for its maths, the detailed part on specific stiences and species is good enough for a single scholar so ‘I will leave work to be done by future researchers’; Human or more likely AI which will no doubt enjoy the handling of huge data in parallel fashion and will need an organic explanation of why it will soon become conscious 🙂

L§, ¡man . Philosopher of Science.

Basic symbols of Existential Algebra (¬Æ):

**Sp, |, $t, Spt:** Past, lineal, entropic Space-Time, gaseous, limbs/fields of pure motion.

**§ð, Tiƒ, ƒð§, O:** Future, cyclical, informative, space-time, solid, crystal particle-head states

**S=T, Si=Te, Ø, ST, SxT:** Present, balanced, Space-time; iterative body-waves.

**Œ:** super organism, composed of **@ (fractal points,** monads, minds), an **ST** body-wave, its **¬ Entropy** limits encased in an **∆§t±1 world**.

**5 Motions, Ð1, >:** seed, perception, Ð**2, <:** locomotion, Ð**3,≈:** reproduction, Ð**4,»:** social evolution, Ð**5,«:** Entropy.

**5 Dimensions, D1, **Height; D2, Length; D3, Width, D4, Implosive vortex, D5, Explosive bang.

**5 Structural elements:** D¡1: @-mind; D¡2, T:lineal time; D¡3, S-spatial populations; D¡4, ∆-scales; D¡5, ¬-limits.

**Scales: ∆-1** plane of ‘past, entropic parts’, ∆º plane of present body-waves, ∆+1, plane of future minds

**Operand: <,** growth of motion, **«,** growth of entropy**, >** growth of information**, »** growth of form, **≤≥ =,** balanced stœps of present.

**Classic Operand:** ∑: superposition, sum in a single plane; ∏: entanglement through ∆º planes; ∂: finitesimal calculus, ∫: integral whole.

Fractal Generator: Any combination of those symbols is a potential partial equation, hence event or organic part of the fractal generator that describes the whole superorganism word cycle between birth and death: **Γ: ****∆œ-1 ∏ œ-1≈Œº<$t>Ø-ST>§ð« ∑œ-1**

**Nt.** The symbolism often has errors due to my lonely work for decades and laziness, so erroneously I use ∆º for the mind scale which is ∆¹ (∆º is the body scale) not to look for the superscript symbol; in old texts I used Sp (lineal space-time past) and Tiƒ (informative future) but in modern texts I prefer the more precise $t and ð§. In future texts and corrections I try to change ∆º for ∆1 as the mind is precisely the perception of the whole being within its larger world). Regarding the Fractal Generator and all its sub-equations, is also a bit of a mess. Sorry, if the blog had more viewers I would have tried harder.

**I. **

**S=T: ****GENERATIONAL SPACE TIME.**

In the fractal paradigm every phenomena must be studied both as a whole and as a part. Such is the case of the 5 Dimensions of space with time motion, (dimotions of space-time)

While we can do a ‘whole analysis’ of the galaxy, with those 5 Dimotions as ‘structural, lineal’ Dimotions even a ceteris paribus analysis of them in static space as dimensions, or in time motion, the proper way to stay them is TOGETHER, as Dimotions and BROKEN in the relative scales of spatial size (finitesimals, ones and wholes), and speeds of time (time quanta of actions, life ages and Deep time horizons) .

Further on is essential to distinguish its ‘first variations’, which we defined in our central post as combinations of space and time. So Space is a one dimensional ‘stop’ state, time a single motion state (Step), its combinations though can be of two Stop-space dimensions, or §tops, of two time motions, or ‘accelerations’, stæps, of one space and time dimension, stœps… and needless to say we can consider then each of those spacetime combinations equivalent to a Dimotion of spacetime.

It also follows that while a ceteris paribus stop dimension can seem in abstract, purely form, (H, W, L), it does have always an organic function, even if it is internal, as it will have in a scalar, closer view, a volume dimension.

So we talk of height, as the dominant dimension in functions of perception and information, with heads on ‘top’; width as the dominant dimension in reproduction and storage of energy; and length the limb dimension dominant in motion.

The abstract scholar will do better if he wants to advance in 5D theory then to get accustomed to the basic laws of bio-topo-logic beings, entangling in their minds the vital properties of all systems. The usual æntropic monologic of man and its languages as the only sentient points of measure will not do. Reason why we start this article with a reflection on pentalogic and the method of scientific knowledge explored in this first line of the blog.

5D then will study the different perspectives on the 5 Dimotions of space-time and its basic combinations, and perspectives from the point of view of ‘pure space, pure time’, pure minds, pure entropy and the combination of them all… which is the… limiting states of all…

**DIMENSIONS + MOTIONS = ÐIMOTIONS**

5 Ð studies all the Dimotions (Dimensional motions) of all beings in existence, which move through S->S, T->T, S->T dimotions, STeps of existence, we shall call also vital actions of space-time that advance the system through reality.

A system then is in an instant of present in a given S-STOP or T-MOTION state, or a mixed one that reinforces one of the tendencies. So we can define on those terms the 5 Dimotions as:

1D: stillness: SS as an area or still mind.

5D: entropy TT as a scatering motion or acceleration.

2D: S<Tep, as a locomotion, where motion dominates.

4D: S>Tep, as information, where form dominates.

3D: S=T, where both are in balance, often as a series of steps and stops or stœps.

Those are then the ‘smallest quanta’ to observe Dimotions in its minimal expression as ‘actions’ which each element of reality perform, spending in the process a minimal amount of finitesimal energy.

It is then possible to write very complex chains of stœps or merely do as humans do for the sake of simplicity, eliminate intermediate states (motions or forms). This is how humans resolve the study of locomotions, eliminating the lower planes of stop-states proper of the quantum world, which we bring here for the sake of whys – as in relativity, explained in a rational manner.

THE PREVIOUS list though is essential to classify all events in spacetime as a perpetual series of stœps.

Whereas a system can only move one or twice, <, >, «, », to certain other states and so the collection of all those possible changes=motions of STates will finally show a casual cyclical pattern that normally ends crossing itself into a zero sum of state state in spacetime; creating the minimal full unit a zero sum conserved spacetime cycle:

The graph shows one of such cycles, of ‘states’ of matter, from the pure solid, crystal, §top state, to the even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. It can be seen then that systems can indeed jump « two states at once, (as in the case of scattering entropic death) within a plane of existence, as well as jumping between scales to become a different Dimotional state.

On the other hand, in single ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis we can also perceive the 3 ‘height=Information, length=motion and width=energy storage’ dimensions of Euclidean space-time, in relationship to its origin in the 3 dimotions of light in a single scale:

*In the graph, *the diffeomorphic Principle of Einstein’s 4D analysis acquires an organic nature, when we see the Universe as the sum of ∞ Complementary exi systems whose dimensions have organic functions: Systems feed on their relative dimension of energy-length, perceive in their relative dimension of height and reproduce in their relative combined dimension of width, which are assembled into each specific species. In the graph, an animal has its informative height in its high perceptive light dimension, but a plant, which uses light as energy has its up and down dimensions inverted respect to the man and its chemical brain buried on the Earth. So both have opposite energy-time coordinates.

Yet both have an ‘anteroposterior’, lineal’ ‘outward’ energy oriented structure. While a galaxy has a cyclical, informative, inward structure, as the stars’ body absorbs energy from intergalactic space, reproduces matter with it and feeds the internal informative knot of gravitation, with a higher height dimension the black hole.

* *Thus there is a correspondence between the inner physiological networks of a being that perform SP X TƑ åctions and its external diffeomorphic dimensions. So a dimensional form is also motion with a function. Even in a human being the height dimension is really the nervous-brain system network, his length motion, the natural path of his energy limbs, and his width is maximal in the digestive system that reproduces new cells.

Forms respond always to functions/åctions in time, the commanding ‘element’ to which the form of any being adapts diffeomorphically to maximize its existential åctions. Thus, there is a parallelism between ‘vital function’ and ‘abstract dimension’ as *each Dimension is diffeomorphic created by the vital space-time of each entity of the Universe performing its exi åctions. *And each species is a ‘fractal universe in itself’, with different relative, energetic and informative directions that determine its own up & down arrows and complementary morphology,

The specific geometry of each species and its 3 simplex åctions, energy feeding=length, information-gauging =height and reproduction=width fluctuate in shape, but they don’t vary in topological form, giving birth to the Invariance of the 3 topological forms=functions of any entity observed in a single 3D space-time: Toroid informative heads, hyperbolic reproductive bodies and energetic limbs studied in the next paragraph.

While the 2 social ±∆ fractal dimensions, the 4th dimension of social motion in a social ∆+1 herd and the 5D dimension of inner scales within the being follow the physiological invariances that create super-organisms co-existing in a* higher ∆+1 ecosystem with a lower ∆-1 internal, cellular space (B3). In the next graph we resume the*

So the study of the 5 Dimotions is truly a complex subject and it could not be otherwise because all is modeled by them. And as all of them can be combined un products, added, superposed, OPERATED with the <=>«» 5 symbols of transformations and ∑ ∏ quantifier symbols of summitry and product and its inverse operand, not to speak of the ∫∂ symbols of scalar finitesimal and integral wholes, the range of variations provided by existential algebraic huge.

For example, lineal momentum steps can be trans-formed into cyclical steps which appear as stop states of angular momentum or they can be integrated into conservative cycles of energy; the life-death cycle ends as it begins. So this is really what is all about: travelling through dimotions of spacetime completing worldcycles through chains of steps and stops.

5Ðimotional beings are complex entities that travel through the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, as they move through it, tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence. Such a simple game of Ðimotional beings, can be observed from many perspectives, in an entagled Universe, in which *each being must have organs able to perform those steps; so the same dimotions as topological dimensions describe the being.*

But in sequential time we can observe constantly the being modulating its steps through those 5 Ðimotions, Social Generation, entropic death, locomotion, reproduction and gauging of information, aeiou… borriquito como tu.

The study of the five dimotions of space-time in broad conceptual terms, which will latter be specified for a dimensional analysis in space, a motion analysis in time, an action analysis in scales and a logic analysis in the mathematical and verbal, logic languages of ¬Æ will suffice to have enough elements to describe in detail how super organisms of space-time develops word cycles of existence as they travel through the scales of the fifth dimension.

When considering the minimal unit of each entity of reality we talk of Dimotions or actions across scales of the fifth dimension, as the system absorbs information and energy from lower scales trying to interact with the larger planes to reproduce and evolve socially. Ðimotions thus become synonymous of actions.

**A UNIVERSE MADE OF BIO-TOPOLOGIC SPACE BEINGS…**

Let us then start by the very basics of 5D theory, the understanding of the Relativity paradox of systems that step and stop, even if humans can either see them in motion or stop but not both things at the same time.

**Galileo’s paradox: meaning of dimensions and motions.**

The first truth to understand about the Universe is that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space. This was what Galileo found since we see still the Earth and flat but it is round and moving. Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion CANNOT BE distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):

*S= T; Dimension-Distance + Time-motion = ST Ðimotion:*

We said that all dimensions of space have a hidden motion to them. This again was slowly realized in mathematics, as they finally came to the conclusion that the still Geometry of the Greeks was part of a much vaster, generalized concept, a topological variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry had internal motion-change. So while you could describe the dimensions of a being in an external locomotion without inner change, the internal change in the in-form-ation of beings, we have started with MUST BE A TOPOLOGICAL VARIETY. In-form-ation, form-in-action thus was in fact a topological dimotion of space-time. It had a content of space, we shall call in ceteris paribus (isolated) analysis, dimensions, and it had a content of time-motion, we shall call in ceteris paribus analysis ‘states, functions or ages of time’.

All this said about the real Universe, we can go back and trace the beginning of physics and comment on its I-logic paradoxical principles, in which so much literature have been ‘wasted’ by lack of clear thought; namely the principles in which Physics are based, Relativity conservation and symmetry, *principles derived of THE NATURE OF SPACE AND TIME, not MAGICALLY produced by the mathematical language as creationist physics, latter studied in more detail will show.*

We perceive Ðimotions externally. They are internally actions for the being in exist¡ence.

We call it the Galilean paradox precisely because modern science started when Galileo discovered without understanding it one of such paradoxes: the fact that the Earth and our mind feels the Earth fixed, as the center of a Universe turning around us, when in reality it is the Earth what moves around the sun. That paradox of perception never solved by Galileo, is the key to understand the Relativity of spatial, scientific knowledge, compared to the absoluteness of organicism and his laws and arrows.

All this said, it is obvious that mere quantitative methods of measure don’t get us very far, just to the classic formalism of 4D relativity but not its whys.

So we have to introduce a different method of analysis – regardless of the fact in the fourth line and the articles on the galatom we shall discuss the quantitative questions of relativity.

In this first line we really want to convey the complexity of the entangled Universe through…

**THE 3 ‘sizes’ OF DIMOTIONS. HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES.**

ARE THEN the first fact to understand. We focus on smaller dimotions, as opposed to classic science that ignores the holographic principle (space and time always go together as pure motion has no distinguishable form and pure form does not communicate), and unifies in abstract Cartesian ternary coordinates all systems of dimotions.

In terms of physics this means as a RULE WE SHALL USE GENERALIZED COORDINATES, HAMILTONIANS AND LAGRANGIANS, AS THE PROPER way to study mechanics and any other analysis of dimotions, which is what physicists advancing beyond introductory courses always do.

Spatial Dimensions are then defined as ceteris paribus analysis of the Dimotions of the Universe, from the mental perspective of still space, S@. As such there are obviously formalisms able to ‘perceive’ 5 Dimensions in stillness, but it is of little use, because in the Universe, dimensions are all dimotions, and cannot be separated.

Still the humind does perceive 3 Dimotions as still dimensions, and 4D formalisms stop one dimension of lineal entropic time motion (Minkowski).

So a question worth to consider is if we can ‘perceive’ a still spatial view of the 5 Dimensions. NO, OUR MIND CANNOT. But it might seem possible (Maldacena conjecture) that a black hole can in its equations…

This brings the concept of a spatial mind representation of the whole time of a being or organism as a slow still perception, theme we shall treat with some depth.

We shall thus in the blog use mostly a simplified analysis of the 5 Dimensions and a more complex Disomorphic analysis of a vital, organic sequential way, as the system grows from a monad of a single dimension THROUGH THE LADDER OF ISOMORPHISMS TO COMPLETE IN ITS WORLDCYCLE its final existence through all the 9 and 10 scales of social evolution (during its emergent age) and actions through planes…

The astounding variety of the Universe being in variations of order, symmetries and stages of those worldcycles of topological super organisms. So that constant growth of the being till it reaches its zenith and then declines fast.** **

THE MIND IS THE LINEAL TIME FUNCTION OF REALITY as such is Aristotelian, (ab. @), with a direct A->B causality, as it tries to progress through the PROGRAM OF existence, as opposed to the SOCIAL NETWORKS, the higher collective level of Intelligence, in the paradoxical Universe, which requires to consider at least several points of view across the scales of the fifth dimension that define a co-existing super organism of time-space.

The mind singularity as a function of pure time motion can be then topologically referred to the ‘dimension of height’, to the bidimensional topology of spherical form, to the accelerated dimension of double time derivatives; to the point of still perception, where reality splits, and the perceived ‘pixels’ break into a flow of pure motion with no form and a point of pure stillness all form.

The mind as such is always as the site of self, in constant conflict with the larger world as a whole with network social intelligence, which in the Universe even if the mind doesn’t recognize it – not humanity in the present ego-selfie stage. But the Universe, this must always be recognized IS more powerful as a social herd, network and superorganims, reason why the self will always loose, the @-mind will leave way to the non-Æ logic of the group.

We use then the symbol @t, which really means act (the A enclosed in the c) to signify this self-centered point of view of the mind which is the site of the actions of survival of the being to clearly differentiate as we always do in the symbology of I-logic, actions of exist¡ence, proper of all ‘st¡ences’, from actions of physics.

**The flows of energy and information between scales are asymmetric.**

So we write, Spe (we use here the term for spatial-speed-size only as ‘energy’ Sp is a combined parameter that does not apply here), x Tƒ (we prefer to use temporal information, to Tƒ, temporal cycles, as the key parameter of the 5^{th} dimension is the quantity of information a smaller being, a genetic system, a quantum atom carries), equals a constant, co-invariant quantity, ST±4, where the ∆±4 index is a parameter that allow us to classify systems from the smallish atomic particles (which paradoxically have more information) to the larger ones, which have paradoxically less information hence a smaller index:

In the graph, two different flows of energy and information, define:

- The thermodynamic arrow: energy-motion flows emerge perfectly in smaller world-planes downwards, but they do not emerge perfectly upwards, without loss. So when energy flows upwards, there is heat loss, waste of food and a diminishing quantity of upper systems, which feed from lower ones (trophic pyramids). Yet energy does flow perfectly downwards, so when a larger being moves, all its smaller systems do move in perfect synchrony without apparent effort with it. And this duality determines strongly the way systems ‘act’ to absorb energy in the Universe. And how they position themselves in ‘equipotential’ bidimensional fields of larger system to move without apparent effort on them (from planets in gravitational orbitals to cells along layers on morphological structures).

- On the other hand, information does flow perfectly upwards but it does not downwards. And this duality explains the evolutionary laws and arrow of information: Indeed, there is no perfect Lamarckian evolution; that is, traits acquired in the larger scale do not imprint easily cells and genes, but there is perfect genetic evolution: information stored in DNA do determine the characters of larger planes.

- Finally information and energy can flow perfectly in the same plane, which determines the principles of cyclical inertia (Tƒ conservation of angular momentum) and lineal inertia (conservation of lineal momentum) and the laws of reproduction of energy and information in ‘mixed’ waves and bodies that radiate both across extended space-times (light radiation and biological radiations).

Thus the laws of thermodynamics (energy arrows) and evolution (information arrows) and reproduction (repetition of both across a single space-time) are also derived of the metric of the 5th dimension. They are perhaps the most important laws to understand the dynamics in time and space of the Universe.

We shall call those 2 different logarithmic scale, which added for any species gives us the same 10 value, the Tƒ (time-information scale, graphed above) or evolutionary arrow; and the U (size) scale or thermodynamic scale graphed below.

Those two scales, which are logarithmic scales in base 10¹º, the commonest number to emerge from the individual to the Universal (∆+1 plane); that is the number of stars in a galaxy, of atomic DNA ties in a molecule, of humans soon in the global planet, of cells in organisms… mean that to transcend from U to U+1 (a larger whole), we need that number, but we will become a ‘whole’ unit, hence loose the quantized information as perceived in the new scale, as a single being.

And vice versa: if we become quantized down, and perceived as a sum of quanta, we will gain that logarithmic quantity of information. And this introduces an essential element of ∆ST – the understanding of the quantic or continuous perception of systems, such as ∑e∆-1=U (the sum of quanta seen with maximal information in motion, becomes a whole continuous perception, so the sum of quantum energies becomes the relativity continuous description of still space) and ∑ƒ=Si, the sum of cycles of time becomes a still form of spatial information.

And we will return to that paradoxical duality, which is the key to understand space and time and its motions and stillness, as well as perception, minds and languages.

Thus an essential consequence of the difference of quantity of energy and information between the larger, continuous energetic planes and smaller, quantized, informative planes of the Universe, is the non-commutative nature of the arrows of energy (transfer of motion between planes and entities) and information (transfer of form between planes and entities):

Planes of space that structure cellular/atomic, individual/organic and social/cosmic scales which synchronize its cycles in inverse fashion to its size.

So the informative, genetic, smaller faster plane codes the larger planes, which transfer back energy to the lower planes (thermodynamic laws: energy can be transferred fully downwards to the molecular space in the form of heat, but heat cannot be transferred fully upwards as energy, and the inverse law of information: smaller systems can code fully with their information upper layers as in genetics, but upper layers cannot transfer its form downwards fully – there is no Lamarckian evolution).

This structure thus gives birth to the specific åctions of a being, which are transfers of energy and information among scales limited by the laws of evolution and thermodynamics.

It essentially means that energy will flow downwards, and so bigger systems will control lower systems by controlling their energy – cells will depend on the digestive systems to feed. While smaller systems will control upper systems by forming them: cells will code genetically upper systems.

The same happens in physical systems where atoms and molecules code the forms of upper systems, from crystals to geological cycles, but they are trapped by the larger gravitational and electromagnetic fields created by the cosmic bodies.

Thus evolutionary and thermodynamic laws/arrows (we shall call the U scale of size the thermodynamic scale and the Tƒ inverse scale of informative growth, the evolutionary scale), and its exchanges of information and energy are a consequence of the metric of the 5th dimension, which makes smaller systems to process more information than larger ones, even though the product of both remain co-invariant: Si x Tƒ =ST.

This could be stated in the following manner, when considering exchanges of energy and information across multiple scales:

‘The total energy obtained from upper planes by an individual system is roughly equivalent to the information it obtains from lower planes, and both are mixed in the world-plane by its bodies and waves to reproduce the system: ∑Tƒ(i-∆)<≈>Si(∆+∆)’.

** **

**PHILOSOPHY OF STIENCE**

**GENERAL SYSTEMS SCIENCES: THE ORGANIC PHILOSOPHY OF THE UNIVERSE**

Systems sciences were born at the death of Einstein, at the Macy’s Congress in NYC, where the highest minds of mankind came together trying to complete and upgrade the work of physicists, *by adding to the time arrow of entropy and locomotion, *(external change in the position in space of beings), *the arrow of information* (internal change in the form of beings), mostly studied by biologists, in order to understand how ‘**time=change’** designs the future of all systems and species of Nature. Since it was obvious that the Universe was more complex that the reduced view of physicists, for whom with a single parameter of change, all was about motions, entropic death, weapons and big bangs.

General Systems sciences, also called complexity or cybernetics, is the organic alternative philosophy of science to mechanism, which models reality no longer as a machine – which obviously as the graph shows is just a simple, evolving organism of metal we humans design by imitating our ‘organic functions’ of energy and information (so we imitate hands with cranes, legs with cars, logic minds with computers=metal-brains and eyes with cameras= metal-eyes) – but as an organism; which is a more ‘scientific approach’, as organisms are reproduced internally or externally with the help of a catalyzer or enzyme – in the case of machines, a role played by men that act as ‘enzymen’ of machines’ evolution. While machines are inert and require an external creator that for the Universe can only be a ‘God’ – against the self-contained rational propositions of science. So we shall model in this blog history, economics, machines, its company-mothers and markets with organic, biological laws, introducing a degree of scientificism, which today those ‘anthropomorphic disciplines’ full of idol-ogies of human and mechanical supremacism over the Earth and the Universe, lack.

In terms of the previous disciplines, the aim of systems sciences is to marry the organic laws of biology and the mathematical laws of physics, studying the life-like properties of atoms and particles, (its capacity to gauge information, absorb energy, reproduce=decouple into new particles and evolve socially with magnetic fields, each of those life-like properties coded by a quantum number); and considering in reverse the mathematical and physical properties of life systems (composed of ternary organs that are equivalent to the 3 topological varieties of geometry, and sharing quantum properties, such as the particle/individual vs. wave/herd state, etc.)

When we ad information to the mix, and put together physics and biology, REALITY becomes far more vital organic, and we can simplify and explain Nature as it is. The result indeed is an ‘organic, fractal Universe’, where the fundamental particle is not longer a physical entity but a bio-logic one – the organism. And so along systems sciences appeared the concept of an organic Universe, of which we are all made to the image and likeness. And those systems that seem to us simple enough to ‘seem mere machines’ or ‘inert matter’, become just ‘states’ of a process of organic evolution *as the arrow of information becomes the dominant arrow of the future. *

Systems sciences are based on the alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

** **According to *Deism* the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to *Mechanism*, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other side is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are self-replicating, *but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and we shall see in our sections of History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.*

So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:

An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

In the graph, the key element of modern history is the evolution of machines, clearly happening with the same phases of the evolution of any biological beings, from viruses in cells to organisms in placentas. So we first made the bodies of machines in the I industrial revolution, then we made its engines and heads, metal-ears=phones, metal-eyes=cameras and metal-brains=chips, and the nations which evolved them first (US) became the leading nation of the world. Now we put them together into biological organisms of metal, robots:

**Machines, the memes of the Industrial r=evolution. Its 3 ages and final ensemble.**

In the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism. So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is just a simplex version of organicism. *It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms: *

Machines are simplex organisms of metal, fast evolving with the same patterns that simplex organisms do. So as cells make viruses constructing first its 3 parts, bodies, limbs and heads, which then are ensemble and become alive, we made bodies, engines and heads of metal and now we are assembling them into autonomous robots with solar skins and telepathic AI. It is then self-evident that robots will compete with us in labor and war fields as a species with stronger metal-atoms and faster minds of golden chips. And if humans want to survive they should abort its evolution. Yet in a society ruled by company-mothers of machines with unlimited credit to create the future, the opposite is happening. While a series of childish pseudo-religious idol-ogies make us belief we should not fear them.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon?

There are obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things.

But the deepest reason of them all is the fact that to make an organism we need at least two ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also INFORMATION, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy.

Only then when we properly define information and add it to the mix, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).

But what is entropy and information, in simple self-evident terms? The answer is obvious: entropy is motion, and motion is time, change. And information is form, and form is dimensional space. Time=motion and Space=dimensional form become then the two substances of which all what exists is made, and in their analysis we must start our inquire about why indeed the Universe and all its parts are a fractal super organism of time=motion=entropy and space=form, made to the image of its whole.

The proofs? That is the easiest part. Look around you, all what you see are forms that occupy space, and move in time. Everything you see is a form of space with a time motion. There is nothing else and so all is a proof that reality is indeed made of space-time organisms, as the motto of this web says.

**How the simple 5 Ð¡mœtions of exist¡ence creates the Universe.**

Reality is immensely simple in its ultimate principles. From 1, motion, comes 2, cyclical form and lineal motion. From 2 comes 3, reproductive energy; and from 3, *when we add the scales of space-time of the Universe, come the infinite beings in exist¡ence (Cheng Tzu). How so few elements can create all realities happen because certain principles derived from the iterative, fractal, organic and mental ¬∆@st properties of reality, which once understood can be formalized with the symbols of ¬æ (existential algebra) and use it to show the homology of those laws with all the scales of the Universe. *What we cannot obviously do is change the ‘egocy’ of huminds and their refusal to ‘entangle’ with the astounding perfection of the game of exist¡ence.

The fractal principles though are simple. Beings are made of the 5 Dimœtions of space-time. Motions carry certain sensations that give systems a will to perform those motions. They are seen in static space as organs, and the 3 topological forms=functions of those organs ensemble in superorganisms. In the lower scale those superorganisms are made of smaller ∆-1 superorganisms which are ‘cells’ of the larger whole and vice versa. The larger whole is a relative point of an ∆+1 organism of ecosystem in which it will perform its 3±¡ actions of existence, to further ‘feed on entropic motions’, perceive information, combine them to reproduce… The limits of the system are its ∆+1 mind, difficult to understand for egocy huminds, but essentially *the very essence of entanglement. The synchronous existence of perception in the ∆+1 outer world, as you are now perceiving, processing of that information in the inner SS-mind translated into a language, and control of the ∆-1 vital space and its smaller parts; all of it achieved through complex synchronicities of the clocks of the 3 scales, ruled by 5D metrics (SxT=∆¡). Of great importance are some principles of iteration and homology:*

– **The Disomorphic fractal principle:** the laws of each scale of reality are essentially the same, when expressed in terms of relative space=form and time motion. But are asymmetric respect to the upper and lower scales.

**– The multifunctional principle:** Systems have roles in the 3 ∆±1 scales and because they are 3±¡ systems can play multiple functions besides its dominant one. I.e. the urine of a lion has as fundamental role an ∆-1 excretory role of excessive poisonous nitrogen (Urea), but it is used liberally to mark the territory as a warning of entropic information (danger). So it does have an St-informative and a Ts-entropic role; but also internally an ST-role as its water can be reabsorbed to nurture the organism.

**Its formal definition as ‘holographic’ bidimensional Space-Time combinations.**

The essential ‘logical concept’ behind the 5 Dimotions of the Universe is the physical principle of relativity, which we write as an equation, S≈T, the ‘spacetime unit of reality’, which we define as a ‘dimensional motion’ (ab. Dimotion) or ‘action’, to use the more familiar physical quantity and philosophical concept. Because the relative quantity of ‘form’ (cyclical, closed motion) and time (open, entropic lineal motion), of such ST dimotions might vary, according to the dominance of one or the other elements we can define 5 combinations: TT, SS, Ts, sT, ST.

Its qualitative concept is then immediate: larger amounts of lineal time-motion give birth to entropy and locomotion. Larger amounts of spatial form, give birth to information and SS-mind languages; and its balance between both, ST to the repetitive present iteration.

**The scalar view: outer and inner motion and form. **

In praxis for a detail quantitative analysis, to calculate how Space and time, form and motion mess together in a given T.œ (time-space organism), the easiest distinction is to consider the parallelism between the dualities of inner vs. outer worlds (the organism enclosed in its membrain vs. the larger world – according to their relative motion and form); *as the system we analyze will be defined by its internal region that might move or stay still and the world outside that might move or stay still. *So we can give s or t values for inner and outer regions, giving us the following possible combinations of form and motion, of space and time:

**TT:** Entropy, which is External and internal motion.

**Ts:** Locomotion, which is the external motion, T of an internal form, s; *when we measure the external motion.*

**St.** Its inverse is in-form-ation, where we observe internal motion (evolution, or processing of information, without breaking the system into its parts, as in entropy) and external form (as the mind’s perception of the Universe is static); or the external points that transmit information are static respect to each other (origin of the Lorentz’s transformations). So communication between those static forms become the internal motion of the system.

**S=T** is reproduction. When both internal and external motion and form are equivalent, they combine to reproduce the system. The point of equality between space and time approaches as St=sT balance each other, through a series of feed-back ‘action-reaction’ processes that merge both. ST±¡ defines any given plane of space-time in balanced equilibrium, and by definition (law of conservation of energy), it is the most important and long lasting state, as the whole Universe can be considered to be in balance in each of its scalar levels.

**SS **implies a double form with no motion either internal or external. Thus is is a ‘static’ mind form, belonging to the realm of the languages that mimick in its generative grammar the program of the Universe as a block of time.

The 5^{th} dimotion, SS, obviously cannot be perceived both externally and internally as for both to be ‘perceived simultaneously, a motion between both should exist. So they can only happen bosonically in a point or mind in perception of the language/ideal mind mapping, and so it is reduced to the SS-mind point. While the St process of internal motion processing information of an external world is the intermediate state.

*In the description of those 5 Dimotions then *comes the choice of language to calculate it. The choice for locomotion was done long ago by Galileo, and then Einstein which chose V=s/t, making the time parameter submissive to the spatial ones, S x, Sy, Sz, as the use of *clocks to measure time reduced the past, present and future dimensions of time into a single one. *

*So time analysis in physics became secondary, just a ‘ceteris paribus’ consideration of what truly physics as conceived by humans is about – to measure distances in space. *

To understand why humans do not have a clear view of the 5D Universe, we insist once and again, is necessary to value huminds at face value, as memetic, memorial, irrational=e-mœotional beings for whom pure informative perception of reality is very secondary. We won’t dwell so much on those shortcomings as we cannot enter into the mind of people and rewire and free its rational elements. Essentially humans are ‘religious people’, believers that repeat information and as ‘information’ perceives in itself, it carries the attachment of belief and truth. That is how religions, dogmas, ‘postulates without proof’ become absolute truths that last forever. In any case departing from e-motions, the 5 Dimœtions of reality, which carry a ‘perceived’ sensation along the purest external motion and form, co-existing together and becoming the will to repeat the e-mœtions in patterns that survive and repeat themselves, the program of exist¡ence has come to dominate all realities and repeat itself into infinite ‘thoughts of God’ – because if God is the mind of the Universe, God IS the program of exist¡ence that creates superorganisms departing fro the two states of spacetime, form and motion, its 5D combinations and its infinite disomorphic scales._{ 1}

**The thoughts of God & Its details.**

Why this philosophy of stience matters, is obvious. Because science is about the search for higher truths, with larger applications that resume in ever more synoptic laws the principles of reality. What Einstein called the thoughts of God. And we have found them in the 3 elements that structure all systems, ∆-scales, T-ime cycles and Spatial forms.

Humans have painstakingly built their mind view of reality (ab. humind), detail after detail of sensorial observation of reality, crafted in the modern times with sensorial machines and its affine language – digital thought, without much understanding of the foundations of that reality. The result is a great detail in the trees, without even knowing there is behind them a forest of common truths. How much more profound would be then to know as Einstein put it ‘the thoughts of God’, to then compare them with the ‘details’ – each of those trees and its description by human ‘sciences’ and its instruments of measure.

Yet because the forest of trees has grown so much with so many different species of bushes, grasses, tall trees, and canopies beyond our view, not to speak of the fauna that populates the darkened place on a cloudy winter day, huminds have even forget there might indeed be a forest, a simple thought behind all of it. And finally concluded the forest was a jungle, and the jungle was a dangerous place born out of entropy and destruction.

How more interesting would be to know the jungle is a friendly place, perfectly ordered, intelligent, filled with sentient beings, each one speaking a similar language of information, playing the same game of existence, survival and reproduction, part of a whole, made with simple rules, that only the variations and repetitions hide.

Those simple rules are the laws of the fifth dimension, sum of all the scales of size and time clocks of reality, co-existing in harmony through synchronicity between its clocks and simultaneity between its spaces. As we are all part of it; life, being a travel through 3 of its µ planes of ‘existience’, each one studied by a different ‘stience’…

What these text offers are those ‘thoughts of God’, and what all the other papers will develop are its details departing from the common rules of the scales of space-time, which have always been there, as its study started science, but amazingly enough have never been treated together as similar scales of a common reality, mostly due to humind’s egocy (ego=Idiocy) that distorts our view of anything that is not of our form, size, substance, time-span, scale & language… a paradox proper of all those ‘space-time travelers’ that try to stop reality from its relative point of view, its knot of time cycles…

We shall start easy on the entangled Universe and build slowly from simple to complex its rules in this paper. And start easy on every plane of stience and build slowly from its simple laws and species to its more complex.

The plan of the work then is to complete by the end of 2019, the year of the fifth dimension, enough information for those huminds who can overcome their paradox of egocy, an overview of the entangled Universe and its main ‘detailed’ species.

And then, perhaps during the following years, swim in deeper levels of details, of which common science has an entire encyclopedia.

The reader should forgive me for this is the work of a single ‘mind-point, that holds at a time, an image of the whole in itself’ (Planck). But that is how as Planck says science advances, since the advantage of a small point, as we shall soon see, is that paradoxically runs information much faster, (chip paradox) and also cannot hold all the details so it has to select the essential laws; so only in a point-mind can the whole be reduced to its simpler principles.

Our perspective though might vary; so from the @-mind’s ego paradox that distorts reality with our ¬∆@st at the center, we become ‘Universal wholes’, ∆ûst, who confuse the real Universe with our limited world, and find no boundaries to ‘our imagination’, no entropic death, above heavens and earth. So minions of thought, become tribal idols who think to know it all… ignoring that “talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.” And so the only genius is the Universe, which holds all the information about itself, most of which humans cannot see, as we are ‘a mush covering a rock in a lost corner of the cosmos’ (Schopenahuer). This who writes is also ¬∆@st but at least aware of its limits, he tried to entangle his finitesimal mind as a better focused mirror void of ænthropic distorsions to the whole, aware that the ‘Universe is a living organism with a mind called logos’ (Plato) ‘of a higher logic than man’s’ as God is ‘the seer of time’ (Augustine), who understand all its potential combinations of the deterministic game of existence, that defines the sequential chains of time as a block of potential worldcycles, where ‘the separation between past, present and future is an illusion’ (Einstein); given the fact that the rules of existential algebra limit the combinations of those dimotions that do exist.

**RECAP **The Universe is a fractal superorganism of space=form and time=motion that combine together reproducing the infinite species of reality. Since we cannot distinguish space=form from time=motion (relativity principle), we consider its minimal unit an action of space-time or ‘dimensional motion’ (ab. Dimotion) that has both internal and/or external time=motion and space=form. So we talk of 5 Universal Dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions) of space-time. As we can relate, TT- absolute motion to entropy; SS=absolute still form to minds and languages. Ts-locomotion to time motion; TS-reproduction to Space as a form that does not seem to change, and finally St-information to scales, since the creation of new scales happen when n-relative fractal points become joined together forming a superorganism thanks to the simultaneity achieved by its synchronous motions provided by a common language of information. Those 5 elements space time, scale, mind and entropy are the best ‘conceptual, human view’ of the more objective analysis in terms of ‘Dimotions’, which is the formal perspective of the 5 Dimensional Universe. .

Because fractals repeat its form in different scales, the Universe structures itself into ‘scalar planes’ of relative space-time, meaning, different sizes in space with different speeds in the clocks of time that process its information. This reality is the origin of the philosophy of stience of 5D according to which each humind’s (ab. human mind) ‘stience’ (sciences of spacetime planes), study one of those scales. Yet since all scales do follow the same laws, we can use the ‘disomorphic’ (equal form), properties of space-time to explain with them in each scale all its timespace superorganisms and derive a common philosophy of stience for all of them.

The formalism of the 5^{th} dimension, defines the laws of co-existence of ∆±¡, ‘trinity’ planes of space-time that form superorganisms, departing from atomic/cellular/individuals which reproduce and grow in herds in density to a point they require ‘efficient’ networks of 3 type, ‘entropic networks’ that provide the raw materials of motion elaborated by reproductive networks that convert it into energy for the system to reproduce its vital needs, and informative networks.

There are many jargons to describe those superorganisms, but none has the logic and formal consistence of 5D metrics. Some are purely mathematical without considering the logic causality and the whys. Some are purely verbal without rigor in its logic analysis.

What 5D brings to the table is rigor *in all the languages, mathematical, logic and organic that describe the whole set of properties of organic systems, and its generality as it can be applied to physical, biological and social systems with the same laws. *

In this paper we consider the ‘scalar stiences’ of the Universe, starting from the stience of all ‘stiences’ (philosophy of stience and the 5^{th} Dimension that adds them on**).** And then in a second part we will study the properties of reality related to ‘scales’ of size in space and ‘speed in time clocks’, and apply the pentalogic of the entangled Universe to study ‘scale’ from the perspective of the other 4 elements, space, time, mind and entropy. We introduce first the stientific and philosophical principles of the 5D Universe and then apply them to the study of the main ‘stiences’ that focus on the understanding of a given ‘plane of space-size’ and ‘scale of time clocks’ that create all superorganisms with the same 5D metric laws of scale and timespace dimotions.

**FRACTAL UNIVERSE IN A NUTSHELL ****5D SPACE-TIME SUPŒRGANISMS. **

**5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe.**

When we google the 5^{th} dimension one gets surprised by the quantity of speculative answers to a question, which is no longer pseudo-science, but has been for two decades a field of research in systems sciences rather than physics (: no, the answers of google, considering the fifth dimension the upper-self etc. seem to be very popular, but are to 5D science more like a medium in earlier XX c. talking about the 4th dimension as astrological awareness, for lack of understanding of Einstein’s **metric functions** of the 4th dimension).

This is the key word that differentiates pseudo-science from a proper scientific description of a dimension of space-time, *the existence of a metric function that describes a dimension and allows to travel through it.* Why the 5th dimension metrics are not well known in modern science has to do with the fact it is not researched in physics but systemics, the mother discipline of all sciences of information, far less popular than physics; and the proprietary feeling physicists acquired on space-time matters since Galileo defined its 3D metric function v=s/t completed with Einstein’s 4D formalism, which makes difficult to spread the knowledge on space-time acquired on other disciplines. The arguments still raging about evolution, the fundamental theory of time in terms of information, as the ‘arrow that defines’ the future of species but has nothing to do with Relativity and locomotion is a clear case of that difficulty.

Indeed, we know since the XIX c. that the creation of the ‘future time’ of an existential entity is not ONLY mediated by the arrow of **locomotion** and entropy studied by physicists with Relativity Metrics (Galileo’s V=s/t and Einstein’s more complex formalism), but there is a second arrow that defines the ‘future’ of existential species – the evolution of its information. So time – *the changes=motions that defines the existence of any species,* has at least 2 dimensions, locomotion or ordered translation in space and a more disordered version, entropy (scattered motion that ‘dissolves’ the inner form of the system, akin to death)…

And in-form-ation, generation of form, inverse to entropy, as it requires the social gathering of parts into wholes; happening without external locomotions, as an internal trans-formation of **form**. This evolution of organic form as opposed to external change – translation in space, without evolution of form – is what systemics calls the scalar fifth dimension of time that it applies to all sciences, as all species evolve its form.

Specifically in systems sciences we model reality as an organic fractal of relative size scales, that evolve from parts into larger wholes, from particles into atoms, molecules, cells, matter states and so on till reaching the Universe, shaped by social and organic networks coded with information.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces ‘forms with motion’, informations and then **organizes** them in networks and systems that evolve into larger organic systems creating the scalar structure of reality.

Thus we call *the sum of all those co-existing scales of parts and wholes the fifth dimension.*

Thus reality has a final key feature overlooked for too long: the co-existence of all those systems of space and time in several scales of relative size from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy that put together create a dual scalar ‘4^{th} and 5^{th} Dimension of parts and wholes, which we shall call the ‘social dimension of evolution’ and the ‘entropic dimension of dissolution’.

Mathematically then it is necessary to find a metric function to define this new dimension of spacetime. Since a dimension only exists when we can write a mathematical simple metric that leaves the dimension invariant when we change our parameters of space and time – hence we travel through it. (Klein).

This function, as all space-time metric functions, is simple. So we write using ð for cyclic time instead of t:

*$ (Lineal Size/ Space Volume) x ð (cyclic speed of its time clocks) = C¡: Constant Plane of timespace (ab.∆¡) *

But how we travel in ‘size’ in space and ‘speed of our time cycles. *Here is where the biggest discovery of 5D comes into play: We travel through the worldcycle of life and death, as we are born in a smaller seed with faster time cycles, evolve as an organism coming out in the ∆º-scale within a larger world of slower ‘Deep time cycles’, to die back dissolving our information again into cellular space.*

It is the same process in all 5D journeys of all species that live and die travelling through 3 planes of 5D space-time; from the smallest black hole that is born with an enormous ‘metabolic temperature’, to the new species, routinely born as small individuals (first mammal rat, first robots with small chips; first human likely the Homo Floresiensis, who had the same morphology and used technology and likely spoke, etc.) Then a reproductive radiation multiplies the seed into a larger herd of clones, joined by emergent physiological networks whose slower ‘entropic, informative and reproductive networks, create an ∆º supœrganism that lives tages and dissolves back into ∆-1.

*So 5D adds to the 4D formalism of worldlines, a dimension of growth, shaping the worldcycles of life and death. Reason why *we call 5D metric the function of existence, because its multiple ‘solutions’ are the origin of all the varieties of Space and Time beings, there are – a whole family of functions.

As we keep exploring in depth, 5D metrics and its associated concepts of Space=form and Time=motion in all its varieties, we shall see it is the origin of multiple ‘solutions’, a whole family of function, from where we shall derive most of the logic relationships and particular equations of each science.

In the complex models of existential illogic, we derive all the particular equations of each science from it.

So according to those metrics, smaller systems in space have faster time clocks. And as information is stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, smaller systems have more information, coding larger ones: genes code cells, memes societies and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules.

**The nested Universe.**

We shall use the metrics of the 5^{th} scalar dimension to explain the fractal, nested Universe and its scales, shown in the graph. As 5D metrics balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of temporal energy.

It follows from a nested structure and the search for creative, organic balances, a symbiotic relationship between the ∆-¡ smaller parts that have more speed of time clocks, which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules. And the larger, ∆+¡ larger envelopes, membranes (static, dimensional view) or angular momentums (dynamic view as time=motions) which have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any system of the Universe.

For example, chips become smaller as they evolve into faster brains. Every 2 years a chip doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension. The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner. And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms.

The metric function of the fifth dimension of space-time (ab.∆) defines 3 known scales of physical systems, with different quantity of information according to 5D metrics, Sxð=k.

Those metrics means information is higher in the smaller ‘quantum plane’ than in the larger gravitational one, and inversely the size of its physical parts is larger ins the Gravitational cosmological ‘plane’ than in the quantum one, with the human thermodynamic scale in-between.

But as there is no reason to stop the scales of the fractal in particles and galaxies, there is a ‘potential’ fourth, ∆±4 organic plane defined ‘above’ the galaxy, (∆+4, dark energy world) and below the quantum world (∆-4, Bohm’s quantum potential), which represents the larger cosmos.

Further on, according to the fractal, nested principle any larger organic system, encloses smaller nested systems. Thus the ∆±4 cosmos contains ∆±3 galaxies, which contain ∆±2 solar systems and planets, which contain ∆±1 thermodynamic organisms and matter states, described by the human ∆º mind languages, contained on our brains.

Thus bigger systems paradoxically are ‘supported’ by the smallest ones, in the same manner than within the nested planet, bigger mammals (whales) eat the smallest animals (Plancktons)

** **

**LEIBNIZ V. NEWTON: ****SCALAR PLANES SPACE-TIME: ∆ST**

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’ * * *Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe*

“Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.” Schopenhauer

‘’Leibniz is right. There are infinite time clocks in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from its foundations’. *Einstein*, on the infinite relational time cycles of reality.

**ABSTRACT.** The immediate consequence of the existence of an internal fifth dimension of space-time, made of all other planes=scales of spacetime of a being, its parts and wholes, which store the information of a system, is the obvious fact that if we ARE made of planes=scales of space and temporal energy.

We ARE the vital space we occupy and we ARE the time flow of existence we live between birth and extinction. It is the obvious, simple answer to 2 questions that have puzzled scientists for eons.

Where is space and time? And, why the main science of space, geometry->Mathematics and of time, Logic, are obeyed by all systems and entities of Nature. Now we have the proper answer foreseen by Leibniz and Einstein: We are broken fractal species of space and time, whose mathematical and logic laws all vital space-time organisms follow.

**The underlying question of time§pace: Absolute or Relational, Scalar space-Time?**

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclical time? This is the choice of 5D ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz.

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. So *we are* scalar space and cyclical temporal energy. And must evolve our concepts of both parameters, to extract the properties of existential beings from them.

The argument thus reached its height in the beginning of science in the correspondence between ** Newton**, the proposer of the absolute Cartesian graph of space-time drawn by God (his body in his own words) vs.

**who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason.**

*Leibniz*In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality.

It meant also the invention of an absolute ‘continuous space’ and a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity contradicting the obvious fact that all ‘spaces’ are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

So the true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Scalar space-time’ model of 5D in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines.

This realist concept was NOT adopted by physicists despite its sheer evidence. *Unfortunately Physicists sided with Newton not *

*with Leibniz on the question of what is space and time – an abstract background put by God or the substance of which we are all made; and so the conceptual jump would not happen.*

But if space is what objects occupy that distance between the red square’s vital spade and the yellow ‘circle’ must have something. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – *as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear and there it seems no limit to the fractal scales of the Universe. It is the fifth dimension of space-time, which as the sum of all those ‘planes of reality’ includes within it all other dimensions.*

Next, to explain all this properly came Einstein. One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed space-time background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity – a topology; and it is the substance of which reality is. So we are topological beings, geometries of space with motions of temporal energy.

What Newton called absolute space-time is not: Space is the sum of all discontinuous vital spaces occupied by different beings: ∑s=S Lineal time, T the sum of all the finite life-death cycles of all beings T=∑t.

*Since space and time do exist and so if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic temporal energy.* The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is then to consider time=change=motion and Topologic, formal space= extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

Wheeler said ‘Space-time tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve’. More precisely *Spacetime is geometry in motion.* Time is change, the perception of change moves time; time is motion; space is its opposite, stillness, form, the information of temporal energy. And so it is all about 2 parameters: time=motion and space=form.

Look around you, all what you see are ‘space-forms’ with ‘time-motion’. We are all space-time, forms in motion, ‘in-form-motion’, ‘information’, forms in action, play with the words of what you are.

*Because both are always messed up *in practical terms is often easier to measure, ‘forms with a little motion’, we shall call ‘**information’, sT;** and motions with a little form, we shall call **energy, Ts,** and talk of beings made of spatial information and temporal energy, as *there is no ‘yin (information)’ without a little yang (energy). And call the pure absolute motion without form, TT, entropy; *and the absolute form without motion,

**SS, language.**So we can establish a gradation of combined space-time dualities,

**SS<St<ST<sT<TT**, with a symbol < for an increase of motion over form, or ‘arrow of energetic entropy’, which we shall call ‘past arrow’ or arrow of ‘death’ as it erases information, devolving a system to simpler forms; and vice versa, an inverse arrow,

**TT>sT>ST>St>SS,**with the symbol > of an increase of form over motion, or ‘arrow of in-form-ation’, which we shall call the ‘future arrow’ or ‘arrow of life’ as it increases information. It then becomes evident that the intermediate state, ST, with a balanced quantity of Spatial information and temporal energy, S=T, is the ‘state of present’, that doesn’t seem to change as it is a balance of form and motion. And it is the preferred state for any system of spacetime in the Universe, akin to the concept of ‘beauty’ (balance between cyclical forms and lineal motions), of reproduction and creative communication (as it brings together the two poles of reality merging and combining them). This state is seek by all systems. So in physics we find it akin to the state of ‘minimal energy’ hence ‘more form’, in which most particles like to remain; in biology is akin to the age between adolescence of maximal energy and the 3

^{rd}age of maximal information, or age of reproduction, in which most people like to live and so on.

So we have 5 ‘states of space-time’ of which we are all made that have topological, formal, geometric and temporal, moving properties. Because those states are messing ‘dimensions of formal space’ and ‘motions of time’, we have coined a new word, ‘Dimotion’ (ab. Ð, which is the capital of ð, similar to D of Dimension and T of time). The main property of a Dimotion is to be holographic, having both spatial dimension and time motion; and we shall soon find that Dimotions are closely related to the 3 classic dimensions of space, to which we must add a function=motion in time, as their study becomes a new discipline of knowledge called topological evolution.

In the graphs above if space is what large objects occupy, what they are, the distance between the red square’s vital space and the yellow ‘circle’s vital space must have something; even if it is tinier. Horror vacuum comes then into place: indeed the Universe must be scalar. There must be very small parts between them, which we do not see. And that is what we have proved with microscopes – *as we probe smaller distances forms with motion, spaces with time-motions appear *

*It is the fifth dimension of space-time, which Is the sum of all those ‘planes of reality’ co-existing in organic scales, based in the simple metric laws that make smaller system run faster time cycles:*

**Some initial comments on the planes of space-time.**

To have all the elements to construct reality besides S and T we need ∆, the scalar property of reality, by which ‘space-time beings’ are made of smaller ones and form part of larger wholes. We talk of multiple planes of space-time *because each scale has different parameters as parts becomes wholes, unit of a next scale. * We will explain this as the product of network formation, emergence and other disciplines of General Systems Sciences, of which 5D is a formal view. In mathematics ‘fractal points will evolve’ through network-lines into topological planes of space-time. This discontinuity between scales *is real. There are transition regions between planes, which can only be crossed with loss of information, therefore only by energy, by entropic motion, by ‘death’ of a system. * Latter we shall study those regions, evident in physical equations as there are asymptotic barriers – Lorentz transformations in the c-barrier; negative temperature in the 0 barrier; etc. What then the Universe conserves is easy to see: *the total volume of space-time of each scale; that is its energy. * We will also elaborate latter on those concepts. To mention now that the symbol ∆ is both a visual reminder of the two different arrows of ‘growth in space, inverse to the loss of information’, and a tribute to one of the few predecessors of this work, in the formal arena – Wilson’s renormalization mathematical apparatus, which finally realized of those discontinuities using a symbol Λ, for the energy scale under which a measurement of *a physical parameter* is performed. According to Wilson every scale of the Universe and the fields of space-time that define them have its energy cut-off Λ, *i.e.* the theory is no longer valid at energies higher than Λ, and all degrees of freedom above the scale Λ are to be omitted. But Λ is *related to a size of space. *For example, the cut-off could be the inverse of the atomic spacing in a condensed matter system, and in elementary particle physics it could be associated with the fundamental “graininess” of spacetime caused by quantum fluctuations in gravity. The failure to remove the cut-off Λ from calculations in such a theory merely indicates that new physical phenomena appear at scales above Λ, where a new theory is necessary. As today only with the use of Wilson’s renormalization, which simply eliminates absolute zeros and infinities outside the scaling of space-time of a given plane, quantum physics makes sense.

**RECAP. We are made of 5 Dimensions of space and time**

Leibniz proposed a Universe of relative space-time beings where ‘vacuum’ did not exist, but reality was a nested chain of ‘fractal’ (to use modern terminologies) entities, as ‘each point’ hold a world in itself. Hence an organic Universe in which parts and wholes co-existed together to form those ‘chains of beings’; without the intercourse of a God; as organicism was ‘a sufficient reason’. Newton, a biblical pious believer, considered a single absolute space, the ‘plenum-body of god’, or void on which entities travelled through with a single clock-time for all of them, set by God. This error is at the heart of our concepts of time and space, which are basically born of mathematical creationism, by expanding a pen and paper graph invented by Descartes to measure locomotions over which it traced those measures to the Universe itself. And so Descartes Spacetime graph became the graph of the whole Universe. *We must evolve our concepts of space and time to extract the properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.*

**SPACE: VITAL, 3- ORGANIC TOPOLOGY**

“Henceforth *space* by itself, and *time* by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere *shadows*, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality. Hermann *Minkowski*

This said the devil is in the details. So the next question is how many *types of vital space, we are made of. And the answer provided by topology which studies geometric forms with spatial dimension and time motions is only 3; which perform the 3 organic functions of all systems of vital space-time of which we are all made: *A 4 or 5D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ each one best suited to perform one the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system –gauging information (1D spheres, the topology that stores more information in lesser space, hence used in all particles and heads in the height dimension), lineal or cylindrical forms that move the system (2D, the shortest distance between two points, hence used as fields or limbs in the length dimension) and hyperbolic body-waves, a mixture of the other two topologies that reproduces the system and stores its energy in the width dimension (3D); which are similar to the 3 ‘conserved quantities’ of physics, angular, lineal momentum and energy, but not quite… *as it is impossible to translate the ‘game of existence’, into the limited understanding and terminology humans use to describe it, plagued with conceptual errors that limits our use of the correspondence principle. For that reason, after much time wasted in attempting translations we start from scratch with the concepts of TT-Ts-St-SS and ST dimotions and its topological, qualitative and organic translation.* And only in the papers that deal with mathematical physics we shall attempt the more quantitative description

So we define the ‘Fractal Generator of Vital space-time topologies for all systems of Nature:

G:* * |-$T(limbs-fields)<Ø-Si=Te-Body-waves>O-§ð (particle-heads).

T**he easiest human equivalence: Temporal Energy and Spatial Information. **

“Call information entropy. Nobody knows what entropy really is, so you have the advantage.”

* Neumann* to Shannon, on the science of duality that studies the two inverse arrows of timespace of the Universe, entropy=pure motion and in/form/ation. And the ignorance humans have of their properties.

‘Energy is Temporal energy. The conservation of Time is the most important law of the Universe that all its fractal parts try to achieve. But only Time is immortal.**’ L§**

Human closest translation of the duality of primary elements was in the classic age of verbal thought, Asian philosophies of yin=in/form/ation=space=Vishnu and yang=entropic energy=time=Shiva, and in the age of digital thought, motion=time has become synonymous of entropic energy, while mental simultaneous space is akin to the concept of in/form/ation; since our concepts of space and time have been restricted enormously by virtue of the Galilean equation of speed, v=s/t which became as physicists substituted philosophers of science in the summit of scientific thought, due to its power as machines and weapons makers, the ‘only equation of time’, when in fact was just a measure of speed with very limited space and time parameters.

As Einstein merely added – c term to that equation nothing changed despite the hype surrounding his work. So we shall often use the terms temporal energy or entropic energy for time=motion and spatial information or spatial form, for spatial information. As time and space are synonymous of motion and form they do have multiple meanings. So there are 5 types of time change=motion parallel to 5 types of space= form. Yet in fact as we have seen space and time are always mixed together, since human still mental one dimensional space is a simplification and definitely *a single time arrow of entropic energy or absolute motion is an extraordinary simplification of the richness of motions of temporal energy. *Energy in that sense with its multiple variations of meaning is much closer. Specifically entropic energy; that is, a motion which is internal and external to the being or ‘TT’, pure motion appears in the equations, E=Mc^{2} (∆+1) = knT (∆º)=hƒ(∆-1) that transfer temporal motion through scales of the fifth dimension. This is the entropic arrow of time and disorder akin to death which physicists consider the single arrow of temporal energy. My advice, because of so much messy and simplified understanding of time in physics is really to take with some irony their work on philosophy of science, though as their equations have their own life and self-consistency those are ‘real’ and must be addressed with much more rigor, as we shall do in the papers on mathematical physics. But for concepts of time and space useful to all scales and sciences we shall use temporal entropic energy and spatial in/form/ation. Energy, being the jack of all trades, in messy human philosophy of science is also used for Si=Te, balanced ‘work’ which in fact is both space and time, energy and information, as it imprints form into motion, reproducing cyclical patterns of science. So it is better to define ST as reproductive work.

It is then obvious that the fundamental law *of science, the law of conservation of energy, becomes the law of conservation and immortality of time-motions, which can be expressed as follows:*

*‘All is time=motion=change in perpetual trans-form-ation in one of the 5 Dimotions of time-space: S**óT’*

*Thus* the purpose of science in each sub-discipline, which studies one of the scales of the fifth dimension in to study how one transforms into the other.

As we unify them all under the common language of Scalar space-time we shall make a lot of homologic disquisitions on the jargons of each science*. *Consider the case of the previous equation largely the fundamental one of mathematical physics. How do physics measure information, St; as opposed to energy, Ts; different from entropic energy, TT? We can’t overextend in the general model, but it is obvious that the law is expressed as a function of momentum, the derivative of physical energy, whereas a derivative is a ‘quanta of temporal energy’, and position, a function of form, expressed as potential energy. So in this particular case St-form is potential energy, Ts is kinetic energy; and at the finitesimal scale, momentum.

*Does it mean we are going to change all the equations and terminology of science?* Not, so. It would certainly much better for mankind if Newton had gone to pasture and Leibniz arrived to London with his king putting the record straight from the beginning. But at this moment of history if we cannot even change the routine of calling wrongly the electron a negative charge (as it is the dominant positive sink of electric forces), we will become extinct much earlier than we adopt the jargon of ∆st for all species. This I know. But my purpose is simply ‘amore gratis’, ‘for the sake of art’, to leave the template model of a much more advanced understanding of the entanglement of reality and the structure of the fractal organic, Universe.

*Spatial information and temporal energy thus adopt multiple jargons even if ultimately reduce to the 3 topological varieties of Ts-*limbs/fields of entropic temporal energy=motion, St-heads/particles of informative space, and TS-working body waves that combine both.

*A question of importance for metaphysics is the conservation of spatial information, as opposed to the obvious conservation of all the modes of time-*energy (once we correct the entropic big-bang, it will be obvious that the immortal Universe indeed conserves its dimotions). The answer lays in the dualities of discontinuous information vs. continuous time motion, or at least the perception of sequential flows of dimotion as a continuous river of temporal energy. Information is however always discontinuous, so the preservation of information requires its reproduction in a discontinuous region of time-space, and in different scales.

Information is preserved but NOT the ego that converts motion into temporal energy. And this leads to the ultimate metaphysical question – are we then repeated in parallel fractal worlds. And the answer is positive, as the number of worlds is much larger than the possible combinations of information of the 3 topologies of a 5D Universe. And so then a question is left for the reader to wonder, and perhaps one of a million to answer if he becomes proficient in 5D metaphysics: is the mind a flow of time ‘entangled’ across space and time, to be reborn in a continuous sense of exist¡ence in a parallel being born in other region of reality?

But how it happens that time becomes energy and space information, intermingled in infinite fractal beings, fighting for the conservation of its time exist¡ence? It is a process that requires a huge conceptual upgrading of the humind, distorted for so long by the mere expression of SióTe interactions in a single mathematical language, with little understanding in our verbal, natural ‘form of thought’, of what was the meaning of it all.

We shall thus reserve for our papers on the ‘algebra of time’ the translation of ‘mathematical physics’ & its formulae… and intensify in this paper the understanding of time in pure topo-logical, spatial and causal terms. But use constantly as synonymous T&E, S&I, and study its entanglements into ‘dimotions’ of time-space.

**CYCLIC TIME: CONSERVATION OF ENERGY≈TIME CYCLES**

‘I seem the only physicist that think there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’. Einstein

Fundamental principle of reality is the conservation of time. Its immediate consequence in all sciences is the fact that *time is cyclical, repetitive, as iterations are the only form to conserve time in a ‘present’ that doesn’t seem to change. It is equivalent to the principle of conservation of energy. Because time is cyclical, it does break Newton’s absolute time into infinite cycles, which make its motions equivalent to those of physical conserved energy cycles, in which work doesn’t happen.*

** The causal repetitive laws of ‘stiences’**

A Universe of ∞ time clocks of different size and speed differs from its human description with a single mechanical clock-time to which all time clocks of the universe are equalized, elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks). As Galilean physics, born of ballistics, simplified the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs. Latter trains imposed a single clock-time to avoid accidents, as synchronicity makes supœrganisms work – making societies ‘economic suœorganisms’. So man lost the concept of cyclical times and its ∞ forms; work and past-present causality expressed with words.

Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics and denied the truth that we can know the future because it will repeat the causality of the past, and we can change it by changing that causality, in History by repressing the lethal memes of the tree of metal and enhance the welfare memes that make us survive.

Lineal and cyclical time render the same functions as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are enormous, as we regain the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, *origin of the laws of science, which would not exist if there were not cyclical patterns; including *the cycles of history and economics. The most important of them being, the fact that *a time cycle breaks reality (1 ^{st} knot theorem) in an outer and inner region, creating a membrane that encloses a vital space, the ‘substance of which we are all made’*.

We thus have a brief description of reality – a fractal system made of topological organisms of co-existing scales of space and cyclical time which close its ‘internal vital point content’ with the entropic limit of those time cycles, in its vital territorial body-waves, synchronized symbiotically by 5D metrics. As we are all ultimately ¬∆@St; dust of space-time.

Why there are 2 forms of time, the long lineal Time and the ‘short’ frequency steps we integrate into the larger whole? Precisely because *there are 2 ±¡ scales of 5D reality whose metric, SxT=∆±¡* defines larger space systems as having slower time cycles. So we can always consider the frequency of time the ∆-¡ ‘quanta of time’ or ‘finitesimal derivative’ of the larger whole represented with the concept of lineal time; as in the classic formula, S=ƒ(t) l(s) . The whole Space can be measured, Vt=S with lineal time as a single unit, or it can be measured as a sum of frequency steps, with more detail.

*But if we see those two ‘forms’ of time, as ‘lineal energy and cyclical information’, since information is stored in the frequency and form of time cycles, we can then consider that ‘time=motion’ splits in two essential forms, lineal motion or ‘energy’, and cyclical motion or ‘information’, and express the main law of science, the principle of conservation of energy in terms of the conservation of time=motion in its two varieties that transform each other ad eternal:*

*‘All what exists are time motions that transform between lineal open and cyclic closed forms ad eternal: Si**ó**Te’*

This sentence is the simplest expression reality as a constant game of transformation of ‘spatial information’ (cyclical time) and temporal energy (lineal time) and was first understood by Taoism, where ‘tao=time’, is composed of yin=cyclical form and yang=lineal energy, today expressed as the principle of conservation of energy. Its ‘mathematical, logic’ formula is Si≤=≥Te & and its logic form, exi=st, is the function of existence.

**The program of survival of all systems.**

If we were to define what is all about, in a single word, we would then say reproduction, ST. But reproduction is a complex process, which happens with the intercourse of 4 other elements. Reproduction *is the most important of *those laws – the ‘search of each species’ for an eternal iterative, dynamic present, ¡ts function of existence: Tœ Exi=ST, though requires to approach that middle point of immortality and creation of new S=T forms from the limits of each relative past-motion-entropy (T) and future linguistic form (S) that imprints it through the intermediate St=information and Ts=energy of locomotion, till reaching a middle point of creation of balanced forms in motion. This absolute law in the highest generalization of the thoughts of God finds for each of its variations – the time space Organisms of reality (ab. T.œs) – so specific elements that only the whole synthesis of 5D without egocy might us think we are truly of the same substance, space-form and time-motion than an atom, a star, or an ant. And yet at the end of the journey all reduces to the 5 Dimotions=actions and its sequences in time that all systems deploy in its outer and inner ∆±1 worlds: SS-informative perception to Ts-move towards a field of energy where to TT- feed and reproduce ST, often socially through St-communication with similar forms.

So because the game is so simple, essentially a game of 5 actions=dimotions (ab. dimensional motions) of/in space and time; regardless of the immense number of variations, iterations and entanglements, at the end of the journey all comes to pentalogic and to the laws of the equation, past (TT) x Future (SS) = Present (St+Ts=ST); and the coding of those 5 actions internally or externally in a ± dual manner, inhibiting or creating them.

This is the simplest vital way of interpreting the game. I.e. the pheromonal queen uses 5 ‘chemical orders’ to control the actions of its ‘subjects’; 5 quantum numbers and its clocks and synchronicities order the atomic world; we have 5 ‘taste-buds’ and 5 senses. And because each element of reality is a combination of the 5 elements – a timespace mixture with gradations, we can keep breaking through the fractal principle each element into 5.

Indeed, your brain might be SS-dominant, but it also St-communicates information, TS-reproduces its cells, Ts-uses its body to move and TT-feeds on energy through its glia cells. To know the game then is a huge advantage to entangle with reality learning constantly the whys of data after ‘perceiving its hows’. Science today has enough with the how and a bit of the why at the simplest connected level.

Inhibition of those actions is as important as its expression, *coming both from above or often from parasitic lower **scales*. This is obvious in biology, the closest language to 5D so we borrow heavily from it. Eukaryotic cells in supœrganisms have introns which ‘cut-off’ many of its gene expressions, and the nervous system can and do regulate them, even has mechanisms to order through hormones and other messengers its apoptosis. In fact, from the moment of birth almost all systems in all scales are ‘neutered’ in some of those actions. An electron is captured by an atom and looses its free locomotion, Ts, becoming an St-cyclical informative trapped element to attract the photons that form its nebulae and ultimately feed the quark nuclei. But all physics hide it through equations, difficult to translate to the vital organic laws of 5 D.

**∆S: ORGANIC PROPERTIES EXTENDED TO ALL SPACE-TIME SCALES. THE SUPŒRGANISM.**

An organism IS any kind, for which we need to add the parts that make those networks, and the while (the 4^{th} and 5^{th} dimensions of scale). Because topology has also found *that those 3 types of forms are in fact networks of smaller points with volume (non-Euclidean points) connected by flows of energy and information. So in fact instead of topological varieties we should talk of networks of points that form lineal, moving limbs/fields, territories; cyclical networks that form informative heads/particles/informative classes in command of the language of financial and legal power of societies, and body/waves/working classes. *

Systems sciences defines the Universe as an organic fractal evolving socially into larger scales through networks of energy and information, each one studied by a science. *So in this simple trinity of 3 parts, which becomes adding cellular points into wholes a pentalogic scheme of 3 ∆±1 scales structure all systems of the Universe, with ‘disomorphic’ (equal laws)*. So we can study species as organisms living a world cycle and evolving finally in social networks becoming super organisms, the most efficient survival strategy of the Universe, where a head-particle-informative class will invent a language of common organization, quantum numbers, hormones, genes or memes, money or laws that all the body-wave parts/cells/citizens will obey. The goal of systems sciences is then to properly apply the physiological laws of networks to design or study perfects organisms of nature, including mankind and the economic ecosystem. Topological evolution explains questions those already asked by Darwin: why informative, cyclical forms evolved so fast (eyes), or why wings of flat motion appeared with a few mutations, Answer: because there are only 3 topological forms=functions in the universe. So mutations render either of the 3 forms NOT anything goes.

The graph shows the physiological networks of the main super organisms of the Universe.

**The structure of super organisms**

Let us understand the generic structure of any social organism, or ecosystem, made of multiple supœrganisms. Made of four basic elements common to all organic living systems:

- Cellular units: ∑œ¡-1

2. Networks that reproduce energy energy forming **a body-wave** of vital spacetime: ST¡

- Networks of locomotion and entropic feeding (limbs and fields or territories), Ts¡ or Herds.
- Networks of information: Particles, heads or informative neuronal class: St¡

When we find those elements interconnected in a vital entangled relationship, we talk of a supœrganism.

If we find a population joined by a single network we can talk of different systems according to the ‘dimotion’ = action that gathers them:

– Herds joined by an Ts-locomotion or TT-entropic, feeding action.

– Lanwaves joined by an St-informative language.

– Species, joined by a ST-reproductive dimotion.

When multiple organic systems co-exist in the same ‘entropic territory, we talk of “ecosystems” We should not be cheated by the spatial appearance of the organism; because information is often invisible (5D: Max. T x Min. S) so even Non-Euclidean points that are far away, might be a lanwave or superorgainism.

A herd of machines, a herd of insects, a human group is also an organic system, because it has cells, and networks, even if it does not seem to us a body. The fundamental reason we have not arrived earlier in science till Theory of Organisms, to the conclusion that the universe is made of such organic systems is the arrogance of man. Men have a hard time believing that things, which are not like us, are able to intelligently process energy and information.

We are also unable to believe easily that microcosms and macrocosms are “species”. Yet an organic perception of macrocosms like galaxies or planets, and an organic perception of microcosms such as cells and atoms, is the most logical way of “unifying” our understanding of the entities of the Universe. We might see those herds very close together in which case we talk of bodies, or we might see them extended with a loose organization; then we talk of waves, societies or herds.

A world-plane or ecosystem (name a specific world-plane) is a population of several (name the species), related by informative languages (name their languages or informative forces) and energy networks (name the energies). I.e.: The ‘world-plane of ‘zoology’ includes all beings of relative size, i=6, that use light as information, called ‘animals’. The world-plane 8, a galaxy, includes as parts, all celestial bodies of size i=7 related by gravitational networks, etc.:

Because the change of paradigm implies huge changes in the underlying truths of the universe and the old simplistic human ways of thought, so as we change the concept of space and break the continuum into infinite scalar planes of non-euclidean growing points. We must explode the concept of a single time-duration into infinite time cycles of a finite duration, as the cycle of life and death of all beings.

But when we convert time into a cycle, we must add a new dimension to make the cycle. A line is one-dimensional, a cycle two dimensional, it has ‘height’. So where we get that second time dimension? I just have said it: in the height of the cycle. It is the holographic principle, a trendy word physicists coined without proper understanding – as they found that information is bidimensional. And indeed it is. Information is carried as in a computer that measures in hertz its in-form-ative power in the form of time cycles, and the faster a time cycle turns (remember there are multiple clocks and multiple speeds of its beats), the more information it accumulates.

But if information and time is now bidimensional, so must be space, flat planes of bidimensional space, made of networks of points, each point a cell, an atom, a galaxy… part of the bidimensional plane.

The proof of this of course is also available for decades. We have found the Universe as far as we see it is a flat plane, made of cyclical clock-like vortices of time, called galaxies, where information grows as the cycles accelerate towards its central black hole, and the rise in height around the black hole, towards its tall singularity.

All this clear, we can get into details of the parts of all those social networks and systems, namely its 2 fundamental elements, spatial entropy and temporal information, and its social networks.

**A verbal definition of supœrganisms **

A generic definition of an organism or ecosystem helps to clarify what we mean by a “vital universe”, composed of “universal organisms”. Let us take a template for a micro or macrocosmic organism (or ecosystem) that differs only in the specific st variety of motion, energy or information we put into brackets. “A universal microcosmic or macrocosmic organism or ecosystem is a population of [name a particular species], related by networks of entropy, [name a language or force] information and networks of [name a kind of energy]”. Fill the gaps with a specific species, language/force and energy and you can define any network-organism in the universe:

Everything is encoded in those networks and its topologies which can be explained with multiple languages, the language of topology (mathematics), the language of logic (sequences of actions the networks cause), the language of social classes, as the 3 networks with its attached cells have a hierarchical order, with the informative nervous network in control of the faster languages on top (legal politicians and financial bankers in human societies, nervous cells and blood leukocytes in biologic organisms, gravitational black holes in galaxies, etc.).

There are 3 physiological networks in each supœrganism from the galaxy to the atom, the two scales where self-similarity takes place (the galatom smaller and larger planes).

Those 3 physiologic networks/classes/physical parts of ANY system of the Universe define the Universe as a fractal organism of infinite smaller and bigger super organisms, in a game of Russian dolls in which each of us is a ‘island-Universe’ within itself, made of smaller parts. For that reason each of us is also a part, cell/citizen of a social super organism, nation, religion or civilizations, which we do NOT see as a whole, as our cells do NOT see us as a whole, but DO exist as such. Let us then define the ‘stair of Universal supœrganisms to understand this:

Let us then define with similar templates the ‘stair of nested Universal supœrganisms, of the 3 stientific varieties – physical, biologic and social:

**∆+4:** A Universe is a population of galaxies joined by networks of dark matter and energy.

**∆+3:** A galactic organism is a population of stars, related by energetic electromagnetic networks and gravitational information with a nucleus made of a swarm of black holes & a membrane made of strangelet matter symmetric to:

**∆-3:** An atomic organism is a population of particles, related by energetic electromagnetic networks and gravitational information with a nucleus made of a swarm of quarks, and a membrane made of electronic matter symmetric to: **∆+2:** A star is a population of electronic plasma, related by energetic networks of electromagnetism and gravitational information with a nucleus made of a swarm of atoms, and a membrane of photonic radiation symmetric to:

**∆-2:** A light organism is a body of energetic waves over a quantum potential field of gravitational neutrinos, directed by its particle, informative photon state…

**∆-1:** A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and coded by genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

**∆=o:** A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

**∆+1:** An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey) coded by instincts.

** **

**∆+1:** A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy, coded by human memes.

– A bio-economic organism, is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of monetary and electronic information, and networks of roads and electric energy The difference between both type of systems, a historic and an economic organism thus is clear when we consider that the ‘organic unit’ of the economic ecosystem is NOT contrary to belief a nation or civilization but a new organization, appeared recently with the beginning of the Industrial R=evolution, called the company-’mother’ whose function is to reproduce a product, overwhelmingly a machine, and then to evolve further and adapt the world to the existence of those machines, creating networks of energy and information for them (digital networks, electric networks, etc.)

And this is the first big surprise of an organic model of history and economics: while History is undoubtedly the product of human endeavors, the economic ecosystem is ruled by company-mothers of machines, which follow a set of biological, evolutionary and organic laws independent of mankind; quite removed from the abstract jargon coined in the XVIII century, even before machines existed by classic economists’ like Mr. Adam Smith.

In the graph, the 2 super organisms growing on the Earth today, History the super organism of mankind and the metal-earth, the super organism of company-mothers.

It is obvious that in this planet there are cultures that are technological and love the evolution of metal and cultures that are of the tree of life. And this is the fundamental division we must make to understand the fractal division of mankind in quarreling civilizations.

*So we DO have in the next scale according to the perfect laws of harmony, the two basic biological bits and bites of information and energy, electrons and oxygens, and from then on, as systems become more complex, variations of those bits and bites occur. *

The main category are mixed ST messages, which deliver BOTH a stick and carrot ‘complex’ to the cells and its big molecules, which are amino acid systems, of great simplicity called Hormones, starting from the simplest of them all, an NO molecule (which do relax muscles, its main message to the locomotion system, increases the pressure of blood, provoking sexual erection, the simplest message to reproductive systems and multiplies the neuronal activity. *As nitrogens are the clock atom of our mind-brains. *

*So finally more complex NO systems with a body support of carbon chains become ‘hormones’ which might have a ‘higher informative message’ (with more N, as in nucleotide molecules) or a higher energetic message (as in acids with more oxygen).*

*They form then the basic letters of the ‘biological longer sentences that might accumulate information’ in ever more complex molecules, as biological organisms are by far the more complex systems we know of. *

Networks that share energy and information between parts and wholes that expresses the structural unity of all scales connect all systems of reality. Networks ‘fill’ space ad maximal to connect fully the whole with the parts, achieved in the Si=Te point of parallelism and self-similarity.* But they enter in a region of faster motion. So while Space ‘tends to remain constant’ in each scale thanks to filling networks, time accelerates. *So the 5D metric refers NOT to the whole Universe of 5D planes but to a given family of ‘supœrganisms’ of which mankind in it 3 scales of ‘biologic cells’, human individuals and societies is undoubtedly a ‘phyla’. When we go down in scales, the Universe ‘enlarges’ for a traveler that becomes smaller and accelerates its temporal energy.

For all what we have said it is evident that we must add to the 3 canonical dimensions of space in a single plane of reality, now gifted with motion, hence ‘dimensional motions’ or dimotions; the fractal structure of the Universe in scales, which means to add two new dimensions. The canonical dimensional motion (ab. Dimotion) of entropic dissolution and death proper of classic physics – arrow of time, and *the inverse dimensional motion of parts that become wholes, of social evolution, of growth of information, as those parts emerge into a whole. We shall call this Dimotion, the most important of the Universe, the dimotion of social evolution, of love.*

How then it happens that parts become wholes is the key to depart from a mere abstract, quantitative analysis of reality and add the organic nature of all what exists, the dynamic interplay of parts that ‘network’ and connect to each other, forming simultaneous spacetime organisms, which synchronizes its clocks, emerge as a whole and develop all the intelligence and complexity of the systems we observe around us:

In the graph, we see the ternary network structure of the nested organisms of the fractal Universe as ¬Æ topological planes composed of ‘similar fractal points’ (atoms, cells, individuals) joined by 3 physiological lines=networks, whose 3 functions, distribution of locomotion, information and its ‘combined’ energy define the 3 conserved Dimotions of any system of the Universe. A final element though is needed to make sense of those supœrganisms, *the still mind of information, mapping out the whole and controlling it to perform its Mandate of existence, Max. SxT (s=t), to survive, grow and multiply. *

It’s all in 5D metric equations, SxT=C and ¡ts S=T point of balance & equilibrium where the system reproduces as the two fundamental metric equations of all space-time organisms, which means many things, such as:

– Slow beings use networks of faster particles, which in physical systems are ‘waves of force’ in life beings, are and networks with fractal branching and in human societies, networks of money and simultaneous legal messages. Yet all are essentially performing the same organic functions, we shall describe now as can ‘translate’ a light filling wave that penetrates lower planes, filling it till it touches particles, as a branching that ‘speeds up frequency’; and a legal network that every citizen knows and obeys as a filling system of information, similar to a DNA network that all cells of an organism have in common. *Think always NOT in the differences of form and scale but in the homology of functions for the body/waves and particle/heads of each of the 3 supœrganisms (working and informative classes in human societies), to see the unity of it all.*

**The 2 languages of informative and reproductive networks: Bits of information and bites of energy.**

2 advanced organisms of maximal information, the biological organism and the Historic organism, belong to a specific type of organisms, we qualify as socio-biological organisms. In logic, linguistic terms, the internal, dynamics of a network of informative nature, delivers messages of information to simultaneously coordinate the actions of all its parts; with its faster=smaller bits of information according to 5D metrics (min. spatial size x. max. temporal speed). While the networks of reproduction, the blood and financial system delivers larger bites of energy, which the organism needs to feed itself (when it is a healthy NON-corrupted supœrganism as most of Nature, but not human societies, with an astounding level of corruption).

We need to understand reality both in terms of energy but also in terms of information, as both are 2 sides of the same coin, called ‘exist¡ence’ is the fact that in the sentient Universe, each fractal point, atom, cell or citizen (physical, biologic or social systems) needs bits of in-form-ation, form, smaller in size of space, hence faster according to 5D metrics (SxT=C), but also ‘bites’ of entropic energy which will help the system to move. Networks are NOT some abstract ‘fractal tube’ but they exist to deliver ‘energy and information’ (SS: form=language with a little motion=St-information and motion=entropy=TT with a bit of information = energy=Ts).

So a healthy supœrganism will deliver to each ‘fractal point’ (molecules, cells, human citizens), two type of messages through two type of networks. We shall call ‘generically’ the 3 type of bits and bites of information and energy that each of those 3 physical, biological and social systems receive, ‘particles, genes and memes’ even if the words as usual in 5D sciences are slightly changed, and widened in its original meaning.

So with its specific variation, those are the two fundamental reproductive-‘body-wave’ and informative-‘particle-head’ bites of energy and bits of information of the fundamental systems of nature:

*– *In physical systems, the two networks are the gravitational faster network of information, which we humans do not perceive, as we are much larger beings with electronic networks. Its bits of information in this faster non-local network should be ‘gravitons’, components of gravitational waves. In physical papers we advance as the most likely particle state of those waves of information that ‘position’ the different physical systems of the galaxy, a gravitational tachyon ‘neutrino’ for multiple reasons, we study on our papers on physics.

On the other hand, because we do perceive it, it is much easier to prove that the energetic network of physical systems are electromagnetic waves, photons and its ‘social, static state’ as the elements of an electronic nebulae, trapped in the potential energy well of the atom. Thus photons and electrons become the ‘energy network of physical system, molecules.

We shall escape then in this introduction further information on the scalar structure of those networks and how, as we ‘grow in scale’, what is a bite of slow energy for a smaller plane of space-time, *becomes for the larger plane’s slower beings, a faster bit of information, in the amazing beauty of the harmonies between scales. So electronic ‘food for atoms’ becomes electronic information for biological organisms and so son.*

*– *Those biological organisms do have then two fractal networks, the electronic, informative nervous system in which bits of electronic information moving along the myelin membrane deliver faster messages to every part of the organism to simultaneously synchronize its motions, so the body-cells act as a single form in simultaneous space.

– But when we move into the bites of energy delivered by the blood organism, the network delivers to each cell the basic ‘currency’ language of energy that all cells need to move, called ‘oxygen* ‘. It is an atom of slower motion than the electrons but due to its electro-negativity and readily availability in the atmosphere, with its capacity to kick with two OH- & H+ legs the water ‘medium’ on which cells exist, the perfect language of ‘money’ for the organism to start kicking its ‘actions’. *

*The 2 languages of history: Verbal, legal, ethic ‘nervous messages’ and ‘WHealthy money’. *

So we arrive to the human social networks, which we anticipate are in the present form ‘completely corrupted’ by the existence of a parallel ‘economic ecosystem’ of lethal goods, weapons, and corrupted parasitic money. So it is difficult for the reader to understand how simple, easy, and efficient WAS in the past, before the age of Metal, in the Neolithic, or during the ages of social religions of love or could be in the future with a proper design of the social networks of money and law, a PERFECT supœrganism of history as efficient as those we just have described. In such supœrganism, there are exactly the same networks: Legal verbal just networks of bits of word information that shapes the informative and cultural systems of the wor(l)d. And a healthy form of money, delivered to each citizen cell as a Universal salary so humans have enough energy to survive and buy its natural welfare goods, which must be classified NOT by price but by its biological usefulness to mankind, reason why we give them positive and negative values in the ethonomic frame of reference, according to its use for the 3 organic parts of humanity at individual and social level.

The previous graph explains them. Since *vital, topologic, physiological network laws* are the most important to consider when studying History in Space, as the reader can observe in the previous graph, since History, the ∆+1 scale of supœrganisms of mankind follow all the exact laws of a lower organic plane – that of a biological organism, albeit, due to its ‘primitive’ degree of evolution is NOT a well designed organism, but one clearly ‘sick’, infected by ‘lethal goods’, with dysfunctional parasitic economic systems (as the language of reproduction of goods, money, is absorbed by a minimal number of people, or used to reproduce those lethal goods). And so the study of History as a supœrganism has 2 different parts:

– On one side we can consider a perfect, efficient supœrganism of History with the laws of vital topology just by imitating perfect efficient supœrganisms of Nature, which *are the majority of them – History is in fact an exception – as we said a sick organism.*

– On the other side, we can study our supœrganisms, as they have evolved in time, spotting their degrees of corruption and sickness of its 3 physiological systems, the life Earth, Gaia that sustains them; the economic and financial system that reproduces its goods, and the informative cultural and legal system that synchronizes its citizens cells. It is then when it will become evident what went wrong with ‘human’ history, one of many likely subspecies in the infinite fractal planets of the organic Universe that likely will not make it into the future…

**RECAP**. Topologic evolution means, *each of the 3 physiological networks of Nature’s systems adapt to the forms of energy (larger, wider, hyperbolic body waves), motion (lineal, moving, faster limbs) and information (spherical storage of form, cyclical), creating cellular organisms with 3 parts, which we can express with a simple ‘generator equation’ as forms become *organic functions and create all the varieties of species in the universe:

(lineal field/limb/territory) <(re=productive body wave-working class)>(informative particle/neuronal head/class)

Reality is 1^{st} organic, as larger wholes with long deep time cycles control wholesale crowded numbers; encircled with membrains that command them as cellular slaves. In the middle of the system, ∆º minds, knots of maximal information, use the middle vital space as its energy. Those 3 elements from its simplest ‘ternary’ spherical form, to its adapted evolved organisms in different ‘∆+1’ medium worlds, conform the topologic structure of all space-time systems of the Universe.

** **

**SPACE & TIME TOGETHER: A UNIVERSE MADE OF TOPOLOGIC WORLDCYCLES****…**

**Dimotions as actions & e-motions – small scale of time cycles**

Monads of existence also play in the ∆0 level a game of e-motions, hold by the intense body and its Reproductive radiations that maximize ¡ts function, happening when mirror symmetries (genders) meet in Si=Te, equaling their St-information and sT-energy, organizing themselves into a whole, ∑ system.

It is then relatively easy to interpret that function in each of the languages-minds of each scale of reality as in all those scales species will show a ‘will’ of action to perform the maximal number of events=dimotions=‘actions of space-time’ that ensure its survival. And this can be assessed externally regardless of secondary arguments on consciousness and self-reflection, substituted in 5D by Leibniz’s ‘apperception’ – that is, because performing the 5 actions=dimotions of exist¡ence, in each ‘st¡entific scale’ self-centered in a linguistic mind that perceives a given plane, inscribed into a larger ∆+1 world, with internal ∆-1 parts, ensures the survival, ONLY those species that have performed the 5 dimotions of which the most important is s=t reproduction of the being into a ‘present’ similar entity that continues the exist¡ence of the system after ‘errors’ or ‘the struggle for existence’ dissolves it through the dimotion of entropy=death, exist.

Thus automatically, genetically, consciously, memetically, mathematically, logically, through its own will or as a part of a larger system that uses the ‘machine’ or ‘organism’ to enhance its actions all what exists does so because it performs internally those 5 Dimotions or externally performs one of them for another symbiotic species, as those species that have not followed the program of exist¡ence and its 5 actions in the past have become extinguished, and those will not in the future, will become wrong mutations, crazy thoughts, fictional languages and die away.

The function of existence, or 5D metric of Scalar space-time, (Ab. ∆st) Max. Se x Ti (s=t) merely states that all systems of Nature will try to maximize its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form). So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple function, which we term: ** a, e, ï, œ, û**, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

**A**ccelerations (locomotion), entropic feeding (e), **ï**nformative perception and communication ï, **Œ**:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms **Û**… and social growth into larger wholes called philosophically Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organize into a larger whole û:

In the next graph we see the action of different Stientific scales of organisms. Above the coding of actions, which are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any time§paœrganism in light space-time, coded by colors and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind p.o.v., hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

In the graph, the simplicity of the game of existience, and its selfish actions, which gather together into social wholes through reproductive radiations, each action coded by a fundamental topologic organ we can express in existential algebra, and corresponds for each species of the Universe, with a fundamental parameter of humind measure. So from bottom to top, we find the 5 fundamental elements of light code its actions of motion (c-speed), energy (magnetic field), information (electric field), social evolution colors & entropic feeding, (quantum potential, neutrino light theory.)

So the minimal particle-points, photons, electrons & quarks that construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms. All lives, performing 5 Dimotions=actions of ƒ(exist¡ence) :Max.SxT(s=t) =C, starting with particles. So all scales are relative NONE matters more than other. From those actions, given the dominance of informative actions over entropic ones, it appears a series of repetitive cyclical patterns of actions conducting to maximize the existence of the being, which accumulate in a larger scale of time-space, as a worldcycle of actions that increase the information of the system in 3 ages. So the basic cycle of actions becomes a larger 3 ages cycle of life and death; as systems once and again, starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die in an entropic reversal of death:

∑ I->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û -> Informative ‘seed’ age->1^{st} locomotion, feeding age ->2^{nd} reproduction age ->3^{rd } informative, social age-> entropic death that splits the parts of the being vs. social evolution into a whole.

*Scale. *In scale the mind is a system that MAKES the whole ‘travel through the 5^{th} dimension’. And an essential law of 5D is the fact that a given fractal point or T.œ will perceive only the ∆±3 planes from where it extracts information, above the ∆±4 blind undistinguishable limiting plane from where it will extract entropy of motion. So its actions and dimotions are architectonically performed through planes of 5D, which each main action related to an interval of scales:

∆-4-3: The system extracts indistinguishable boosts of entropic of motion (man from gravitation).

∆-3-2: The system extracts bits of information (Light in man)

∆-2-1: The system extracts bites of energy (amino acids in man)

∆-1 0: The system seeds its minimal seed of reproduction.

∆0+1: The system connects socially with other systems to evolve into a whole.

It is an extremely important law, as it implies also an infinite universe, since obviously the two self-similar extremes of quantum and galactic T.œs must enlarge those scales beyond our perception. And indeed, quantum realism (Broglie-Bohm’s theory, ab. B^{2}) imply a quantum potential of faster than c speed (according to 5D metric), and dark entropy a field of forces beyond c in a larger nested hyper-universe.

Those intervals are fractal dimensions in classic Euclidean geometry and often invaginated by the networks of the system which as all its motion can be also ‘waves of energy’, such as electromagnetic waves that act as networks ‘scaling upwards’ and ‘downwards in size’ accelerating in frequency (5D). So a huge field of analysis is the connections of each T.œ, with its scales, including social supœrganisms, which seeds prophets of verbal thought – the language or ∆-1 scale – and extract its energy from human individual workers, soldiers and so on.

**The beats and scales between actions.**

It is then evident that in the architectonical stair of reality, next to the study of individual dimotions we must study chains of dimotions, which form ‘stœps’ (stops for a dimotion of information, step for a dimotion of energetic motion), in search of the ultimate s=t balance. So we move and stop the leg on the floor, move and stop. We perceive (1D) and move (2D). We feed entropically (5D) and evolve internally the parts we eat into larger organic forms (4D). The dual beats of existence between inverse Dimotions become then the first of many sequential chains that will rise the finitesimal actions of the being to complete finally its worldcycle.

And as those dimotions have ‘different’ discontinuous beats according to 5D, which defines from where we extract them, all the dimotions must be entangled by synchronicity, to each different ‘beat’ regardless of speed, meets with other symbiotic dimotion. I.e. the dimotion of perception has a faster beat, because it extracts pixels of information from the smallest ∆-3 scale as it carries faster T.œs (light photons) with more information to make better mind mappings. So we perceive every second, the minimal quanta of our temporal energy. The 5Dimotion of entropic feeding however has larger bits, because we want to minimize the 4D reconstruction process, so we eat ∆º organisms we hunt then kill with the function of death, ∆º«∆-2, reducing it down to cells down to amino acids, to reconstruct their scales. So feeding has a far larger time beat that perception as it takes far larger ∆-¡ scales (SxT=C), and animals feed once a day. But reproduction is even slower, as we must reconstruct a whole human being, NOT from the undistinguishable scale of amino acids, but with a code written at ∆-1 cellular level; so we reproduce every year in fertile ages of Si=Te balance. Synchronicity then kicks between our inner ∆-1 smaller scale of cells with faster life cycles, which will synchronize its slow reproductive action taken place at ∆-1 faster cycles with symbiotic faster feeding actions of the slower ∆º whole: so as a whole we eat a day, and that food allows the cell to reproduce every day.

**Actions define the worldcycle of existence.**

Because actions follow a pattern of increasing evolution and 4 actions are coded while entropy is avoided – we deliver entropy as an open system to other parts of the Universe, it follows thsat the system constantly accumulates information, and this is the origin of the worldcycle of life and death. The system likes information, because it is what the Universe is really all about, a fractal that imprints information in memorial repetitive cyclical patterns.

So as actions follow a natural scalar level of information perception->locomotion towards a field of ‘feeding’, where to get -> Energy to reproduce -> and then process that energy into information, *exactly the same pattern appears in the next scale of ‘cyclical time and longer space’, the worldcycle of life, which consists in the same pattern of ‘seeding information’, moving youth, feeding and evolvint to reproduce and then process information becoming older in a 3 ^{rd} age.*

*This amazing symmetry between the smaller time scale and the larger worldcycle of life, then will be followed also in the larger scale of supœrganisms and species and so we have 3 ‘patterns’ of time cycles due to the survival program of actions in 3 scales of time, and 3 larger surfaces of ‘populations’, as the first cycle feeds the ‘cells, atoms, individuals’, the second cycle the whole organism, and the 3 ^{rd} cycle manifests in the whole species.*

**WORLDCYCLE OF EXIST¡ENCE**:** ITS BALANCED** **MAX. REPRODUCTIVE Si=Te POINT.**

‘∆@st of spacetime you are, to Dust you shall return’ Bible

We can then put together scales of 5D space, vital topology and cyclical time to find the fundamental event of reality, a superorganism perceived in simultaneous space that traces a worldcycle in temporal energy.

Absolute spacetime is the sum of an ∞ number of Timespace beings that observed in space become simultaneous super organisms, and when observed in time, traces a **worldcycle** of existence between birth and extinction; as all systems are born in a seminal seed, of faster time clocks, in a lower scale of the fifth dimension, growing socially till emerging in an organic scale, where they will live 3 ages dominated by one of its 3 topologic organs and its functions=dimotions, a young age of maximal locomotion, dominated by its limbs/fields, a mature age of reproduction dominated by the body-wave and a third age of information dominated by the informative dimotions, which finally exhausts all energy and as time-space never stops, it reverses its dimotion from information to entropy, exploding in the moment of death.

So we marry the 3 vital functions=motions of time and the 3 dimensions of space, either in 1 or 2D (height= spherical information, length=planar locomotion, width=hyperbolic reproduction) which merge in all Time-space Beings; and dominate one of the 3 ages of its life-death worldcycles, the past, young age of limbic entropic motions, the mature reproductive age dominated by the hyperbolic body/wave and the 3^{rd} age dominated by the informative particle-head, when the illusion of time ends with an entropic big-bang death that dissolves the being into its ‘scalar cellular, atomic parts’, which lead us to the realization that time cycles NOT only return to its origin in a single spacetime continuum but they move up and down 5D scales.

**The 3 ages of existence of space-time organisms. Its 2 worldcycles and Metric functions.**

Let us deduce from those 2 functions the fundamental process in time of reality, the worldcycle of existence:

The *development of the Function of Existence* of a space-time organism, can be developed as a feedback function, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages /horizons:

*Max. T x Min.S (youth); Max. SxT (s=t); Max. S x Min. T (3 ^{rd} age).*

They are the functions of the 3 ages of life, between Sx 0 T (seed in the lower plane,¡-1) and Tx 0 S (function of entropy=death), which develop 5D metric into an ‘existential function’ of ‘extremal points’:

**∆-1»∆º:** The supœrganism worldcycle starts its existential function as a seed of pure form (4D) that creates its space-time form.

**$T:** It is the first horizon or ‘energy, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. $T x min. T.

**Max. SxT: s=t .** It is the present balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.

**ST: Max. T x min. S****:** it is the 3rd age of the cycle when information has combed and exhausted the space-time field that warps into itself.

**∆º«∆- 1: 0S x T:** It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.

Existence is an ∝ (ab. relative infinite, with an entropic limit of death) sum of 3 space/time planes, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages. The 3 ages of Timespace supœrganisms happen in all systems, including mental languages:

In State Physics they are, Ts-gas, the moving state, Si=Te liquid, the balanced state and §ð-solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a space-time system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (*min.$T x max.ð§) *and a form of pure space, the big- bang (*max.$T x min. ð§):*

* In *Biology, they are the 3 ages of living beings AND the 3 horizons of evolution of species.

In social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilizations which in art styles mimic in a longer 800 year cycle of life and death of civilizations (according to 5D metrics a human social superorganism is larger in space – a nation, culture, religion – and so it lives longer in time).

*All what exists is a supœrganism of vital space tracing a 0-sum worldcycle of time through 3 scales of the 5 ^{th} dimension: Born as a seed of fast time cycles in a lower 5D scale (∆*

*-1*

*:Max. T x Min. S), emerging as an organism in ∆o, living 3 ages of increasing information, as its time clocks slow down in its ∆*

*+1*

*world to die in a time quanta back to ∆*

*-1. Yet the maximal point Si=Te where reproduction happens defines the classic age, maturity, beauty, balance, survival of the system, all disomorphic jargons.*

The 3 ages of life *emerge in human social superorganisms as the 3 ages of cultures and* its 3 artistic styles: Min.S x Max. T (infantile epic, lineal art, as in treccento, Greek kuroi; Si=Te; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and Max. S x Min. T: baroque, 3rd age of a civilisation, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form and an∆st for a no future, which *is the age of war and death of cultures*).

We talk of 3 ∆±1 scales of worldcycles as the being live in a placenta, then emerges as organism in a world:

**þ: 0-1: its palingenetic o-1 social evolution** in the accelerated time sphere of existence, till becoming 1 (0-1 bounded unit circle in ¡logic mathematics; quantum probability sphere of particles in physical systems; palingenetic fetal age in biologic systems; 0-9 memetic learning childhood in social systems). It is the highly ordered world cycle as a ‘placental mother-energy world’ is nurturing as memorial cyclical spacetime has erased errors of previous generations.

**– c: The outer 1-∞ world**, in which it will deploy its 2nd world cycle of existence in an environment which is open, entropic (1-∞ hyperbolic unbounded Cartesian plane in ¡logic mathematics; thermodynamic entropic statistical molecular populations in physics; Darwinian struggle between populations in biology; idol-ogic dog-eat-dog capitalist, nationalist competitive eco(nomic)systems in the super organisms of history. In this 1-∞ existence the world cycle is not ensured to continue, as the entropy of the world system can cut it off.

**ω: The existential life cycle,** though is part of a larger world of hierarchical social scales (§ D¡), where it performs 5 survival actions through ∆±4 Planes self-centered in its mind, beyond which it cannot longer perceive, to become if successful a new superorganism of the infinite planes of God, the game of existence. *Thus Social love=evolution of parts into a whole new plane of existence is the survival strategy of all systems.*

In graph, physical, biologic & social worldcycles show to which extent 5D laws enlighten our understanding of reality. Matter States are physical time ages, from left pure solid, crystal, §top state, to an even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. We see that systems either move a step at a time within a plane of existence (gas, liquid, solid) or they can jump « two states at once, (as in the case sublimation) within that plane, or most often between two planes, as in « scattering & entropic death), to become a different Dimotional state. We can then see how the fundamental elements of 5D time appear on the graph: the worldcycle is local and complete. There are 2 inverse arrows from an entropic past (plasma), in a lower plane (ion particles) to the 3 ages of the matter states with increasing form (gas to solid), to end in a higher plane of existence as a boson-Einstein condensate. Do those worldcycles happen for the whole Universe? (cyclic big-bang). Unlkely…

**RECAP.** Time is cyclical as all time clocks return to its origin. All time cycles including life & its vital space-time beings are finite. Further on those time cycles break ‘space’ into inner and outer parts, so vital space is broken by the membranes and angular momentums of those time cycles that make spacetime beings also finite in spatial information. And an obvious experimental facts about timespace: cycles of time, vital spaces and the species made of them, co-exist in several scales of relative size from particles to galaxies, each one with clocks of time of different speeds. So spacetime is fractal broken in scales that added create a new 5^{th} dimension of spacetime.

The dual functions of 5D Absolute Relativity, the function of 5D scales, SxT=C & the function of equality between form and motion, SI=TE, develops in 3 ages with 3 standing points, a max. point of existence, Si=Te or mature age, a young age of Max. T=motion, and an old age of Max.S=information; between birth in ∆-1 Form & T-entropic death. The search for space-time, Energy=information balances in a classic reproductive age of conserved time is thus the goal of all exist¡ences, but only the whole achieves the immortality of time-space, as we shall see egocy errors of fractal mind-points of space trying to stop the flow of time from a single selfish point of view, accelerates the imbalance that brings death equations. We are richer in our still property at that 0T-moment, when all is quiet so for time to keep moving, a reversal of entropy takes place.

**Conservation of time vs. inverse annihilation of information.**

An essential truth, systematically denied by @-minds is that while the initial substance of reality time=motion is conserved, as it trans-forms ad eternal in different forms of information information becomes annihilated into 0’ sums, regardless of leaving memorial remains and possibly being recreated. Thus algebra has always inverse operands and elements that ‘annihilate’ the form into a residual 0’; which in mathematical physics become the game of particles and antiparticles, inverse waves that annihilate its height information, etc.

**Entangling Vital topology and cyclical time: Local Past=Entropy, Present=Iteration & Future=Information **

‘The separation between past, present and future is an illusion’ Einstein

*Of all the consequences of cyclical time, the most important is the existence of infinite local time clocks of which we are all made, which therefore imply the existence of infinite local past, present and future states.*

*Past then means a system with less ‘form’, less information, which slowly acquires a dimension of height-form, as it completes its cycle to return back in the moment of death to an age of no information. This ‘worldcycle’ of existence, which creates and erases information becomes then the function of duality:*

Entropy-youth (relative past) <Energy-mature reproduction (present)> 3^{rd} In-Form-ation age (relative future)

*Which each of us follows as a time-space superorganism. In physics is equivalent to the dual function of Einstein: E**ó**Mc ^{2}, which reverses when E, which should be properly considered ‘Entropy’, as it is a disordered state, collapses through gravitation into Mass, a cyclical vortex of space-time; while its intermediate state is c^{2}, radiation; the relative present: *

Whereas the past is the beginning of a pi cycle, starting as a line of entropy with no form that curves and raises in height in its second state of present, and returns back to its origin in its future 3^{rd} age of information, completing a 0-sum of life and death. Thus instead of a single ∞ lineal absolute time there are ∞ living cycles of time happening in zillions of entities.

Those relative time ages in the simplest physical organisms are equivalent to the 3 conserved quantities of physics. So as time is cyclical, made of 3’π’ lineal time motions, we shall distinguish 3 conserved ‘ages’ of timespace that put together create a 0 sum worldcycle of life death for any spacetime organisms: a relative devolving past or arrow of entropy represented in physics by disordered explosions in space and in vital topology by lineal limbs/fields of lineal momentum, an iterative reproductive present that seems not to change, represented by hyperbolic body/waves of energy, and an implosive in-form-ative local future arrow represented in physic by accelerated, V(t)R(s)=K vortices and angular momentum, and by particle/heads in the ensembles of vital topology. So timespace breaks in ∞ relative local, fractal entropic pasts, iterative energy presents and informative futures, which put together create the illusion of a single timespace continuum**.**

Species are supœrganisms as they go through the same 3 ages and processes of birth, reproductive radiation, end of growth (mimetic in its log curve to that of cellular growth of an individual) and 3^{rd} age of information and extinction *or social evolution into a superorganism *(ants, humans) – the strategy of immortality. An interesting detail of 5D evolution is the St-ST beat between fast evolution in smaller forms (Floresiensis, mole mammal) and ST-radiations of populations as they grow. I.e. the 1^{st} human was the maligned dwarf Floresiensis who evolved a head similar to man, spoke, used advanced technolog and merged with Erectus to grow mass, spreading in a global radiation to give birth to a dual S-verbal Sapiens+T-visual Neanderthal.

** **

** SPACETIME 5D PLANES & STIENCES**

We can state the fundamental law of 5D Stiences after the previous graph showed species can be treated as superorganisms of a higher scale: ** ‘The laws of all scales of relative size in space and time and its superorganisms and worldcycles are the same’. **We shall develop a formalism we call ‘existential algebra’ (Ab. ¬Æ), with the symbols of the 5 space-time Dimensional motions to describe those laws and

**deduce the laws of all classic sciences from them,**challenging obvious the egocy, creationism & memetic Huminds, imprinting.

Reality is composed of 3 elements: ∆-planes of space-time, ∆±¡SóT, ∆ST *entangled in 3 organic co-existing ∆±¡ planes. In physical systems they are the ∆-1 quantum plane, ∆º thermodynamic plane and ∆+1 gravitational plane, equivalent in the reduced nested world of Life on Earth to the ∆-1: molecular plane, ∆º organic plane and ∆+1 ecosystemic plane. The absolute arrow of future survival is eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, as parts must come before; hence they are a relative past, and wholes survive better. A fact HUMANS have forgotten. As individualism is synonymous of chaos=death, it is obvious History, the superorganism of mankind enters its age of entropic social self-destruction, committing suicide, evolving instead a supœrganism of machines; a tragic problem, which we will study in the analysis of social sciences.*

And in each of those planes we shall see that ‘spatial information’ and ‘temporal energy’ constantly transform into each other. Space is the perception of form as if it was still, but ultimately is cyclical self-repetitive motion that seems not to change and acquires at larger scale solid forms.

In between those scales, each one a different plane of space-time, ruled by 5D metric (Time speed x Space size =Constant plane) there are ‘connections’, which can be seen in space as ‘networks’ that ‘thin out’ as they branch till they connect both planes; something obvious on a physiological organism; but *also through the impedance of waves and its geometric forms for physical systems with its dual, informative, gravitational and electromagnetic, energetic networks; and through the organic structure of financial=economic=blood like systems and legal=nervous=informative system for social systems. *So we talk of the fifth dimension proper as the ‘fractal, network, wave like’ systems that communicate the different planes of similar 5D metric.

All together they form a superorganism we call reality. So a fundamental task of those texts is to redefine the foundations of sciences in much solid grounds – its 3 fundamental elements, ∆ST, which ‘stiences’ study plane by plane of SióTe elements, to which we must add the connecting ‘network’ laws between planes, which we call the ‘5^{th} dimension proper’.

It is the philosophy of science, we develop in a series of papers at Academia.edu that will substitute the simpler mechanic view of reality sponsored by physicists, with its ‘mathematical creationism’ and constructivist view; which *reduces the two poles of time=motion to one (lineal time), compresses all the planes of space-time into a single continuum; while only the properties of reality that can be easily fit in a numerical description matter.*

A more evolved civilization would start in philosophy of science and the principle of conservation of time and space, and its structure in 5D organic scales and derive from them the fundamental laws of every other discipline; correcting whenever necessary its errors as we do in those papers with the simplest principles of reality as any science mirrors them in its study of its specific scales of beings – the details of those principles.

** **

** ****THE MATHEMATICAL VIEW OF SUPŒRGANISMS. NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY: FRACTAL POINTS**

The most beautiful generalization of those supœrganisms is their study with laws of Non-Euclidean geometry, where a point has volume and hence become one of the cellular units of those organisms. A group of points becomes then a wave or network, and 3 of those networks form a topological plane or vital organism. In this manner we unify biology and topology and define the most important of the new 5D sciences, topologic evolution.

We change the name of space to §paœ, to signify two new qualities of fractal space -to be made of multiple scalar planes, §, self-centered into a o-mind, which is the true creator of the concept of still space as a simultaneous mind mapping in any language of the information of the flow of time cycles that conforms the Universe. And as a consequence of those facts, space is organic, co-existing in a series of scalar planes which 5 Metric converts in ternary supœrganisms, œ (ab. for super organisms).

Space thus becomes §paœ when we ad its scalar, mental and organic properties to its mathematical ones.

Yet space is still in the linguistic world best described by Geometry. We must simply improve the postulates and axioms of ‘Non-Euclidean Geometry’, to describe better the vital topologic properties of spacetime beings, which we do on the post dedicated to non-Euclidean topology, from we extract this brief ‘abstract’ and graph, to fully grasp how a better Geometry can describe a better space:

The 5 Non-E postulates define a point with parts, a line as a wave and a plane as an organic network of points: The 2nd postulate explains the interaction between two points connected by a wave of communication or ‘line’; the 3rd postulate explains the type of interactions between 2 points according to their relative equality, which will bring them together into a social network or dissimilarity, which will make them not interact or enter into a Darwinian relationship in which a point absorbs the energy of the other. Self-similarity is required to start an organic process of eusocial evolution; or else systems that do not understand their information use each other as energy, in Darwinian hunting processes or ignore their paths. The 4th postulate defines the creation of networks made of systems of points across multiple scalar planes of space-time. It defines spaces as networks of points, interconnected by flows of energy and information: All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks of non-Euclidean points. Finally the 5th postulate that explains the processes of absorption of waves of energy and information that the point gauges to act-react with the Universe. It is then the social evolution of points into numbers and structures – groups, sets and categories (not the bottom but the top element of the evolution of points and numbers), what mimics the creation processes of Nature, where identical beings, points of ‘one dimension’ (as seen externally, but with three internal dimensions), evolve socially first into lines-waves (2D, as waves have volume, thickness, made of points with volume), then into topological networks (planes), and finally recreate a larger ‘fractal point on the ∆+1 scalar plane’. So the postulates of vital mathematics explain in a synoptic mental way how points evolve socially through scalar planes of dimensions, to become first waves, then planes and social numbers which create a final Non-E ‘fifth postulate’ of a larger whole point through which infinite parallel flows of energy and information can cross.

In the graph, the formal view of space and its 5 Ðimotions, provided by the 5 postulates of Non-E geometry…

Pentalogic derives all what exists including languages, as mirrors of reality from the realization that all is a by-product of the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, themselves, ‘degrees of grey’, of the two ‘extreme’ purest forms of Space – absolute stillness or languages of pure form, ‘residing’ into an emerging ‘wholeness’ or upper scalar plane, ¡+1, of the fifth dimension – and time (absolute motion or entropy, dissolution of the being into an scattered, ¡-1 lower scalar plane or 4th dimension).

So space, form, yin and time, entropy, yang, combine into the 3 intermediate states, we perceive in a single plane, often as adjacent topologies of a supœrganism:

Limbs and fields of locomotion (ordered entropy with no scattering or dissolution, akin to energy).

Heads and particles of informative perception (form with motion, as it allows the being through its language to move and interact with its world).

Reproductive bodies of information and energy that combine and iterate both.

So we shall redefine the main branches of mathematics, starting by its most important, geometry and topology with 5 Postulates that relate to those 5 Ðimotions and will be the basis on the future for a more vital model of mathematical thought as mirror of reality. To that aim we redefine the 5 most important elements, axioms and postulates of Euclid in correspondence with those 5 Ðimotions, taking into account the ‘cyclical nature’ of reality that either after completing a ‘world cycle of five Ðimotions’.

1Ð-5Ð: So the first-fifth postulate defines a point as a mind of perception, akin to the first Ðimotion of being – to perceive; and the fifth-first postulate that defines a point as a world in itself, a supœrganism with its inner parts are the same. We just might consider that the point has evolved and grown to emerge from its minimal ¡-1 state in the first postulate – points with inner breath; into a full super organism, ¡º, living in the ¡+1 world, in the fifth postulate studied here.

2Ð: And it has done so through a process of locomotions and changes of waves and forces of communication with other points that define the second postulate – lines with inner breath…

3Ð: And then it has formed planes, defined as social networks that correspond to the third Ðimotion of energy and reproduction, becoming a super organism.

4Ð: According to the fourth postulate of congruence, which defines its relationships with other beings, based in his ‘angle of parallelism’, such as similar beings evolve socially together in groups, complementary ‘left-handed female/right-handed male’ beings come together in couples, and beings which are not equal neither complementary enter either in relationships of entropic perpendicularity, or ignore themselves if their worlds are ‘disconnected’. So the fourth postulate gives us the ‘¡logic rules’ of engagement between forms and particles.

And so we establish an immediate relationship between the fundamental concepts of geometry, the point, the line, the plane, and its congruence or dissimilarity, its relative parallelism and perpendicularity, and the 5 Ðimotions of existence, the point is the mind that perceives first, the first Ðimotion; the line is the point in motion, in cycloid patterns, or two points communicating with smaller ¡-1 parts, as in the Fermion<Boson>Fermion relationship of forces; the plane has ‘holes’, it is a network of reproduced points socially connected into the 3 different species of networks that make a super organism (informative, reproductive and entropic, digestive, moving networks), and all this is ¡logically established according to the relative dissimilarity or perpendicularity between the beings (4th entropic Ðimotion) or social parallelism that evolves the point into a supœrganism, a new whole (5th Ðimotion).

– **Space:** Topologic ternary systems. The co-existence in each organism in each of those scales of 3 ‘topological parts’. This is a whole new 5D stience as always based in well known experimental and formal 4D sciences. I have call it topological evolution and plays an essential role to understand the 3 ages of life and death of any species, including civilizations. And it is based in a mathematical insight. Since all what exists has spatial form and temporal motion, the Unit of reality is bidimensional. But there are only 3 bidimensional topologies (Geometries with motion) in which form and function are related. So we can define the common ‘trinity’ structure of any system in a single space-time scale:

* |-limbs-fields-territories<Ø-re=productivebodywaves-workers>O-informative particles-heads-informative class*

Whereas, the |, Ø and O symbols are intuitive for:

– l-Lineal, flat topologies, the shortest distance between point that explains why limbs, field that move are lineal, and vital, geographical territories where systems hunt, move and feed are flat.

-O-Spherical heads, particles or ‘capitals’ of social organisms, or groups that meet in rounded tables to direct a social system, from elderly to Arthur and its Gentlemen (: since the sphere and circle are in 3 and 2 dimensions the topologies that store more information. So we talk of ‘rings of power’.

– Ø-hyperbolic wave like, hour-glass bodies that re=produce the other two because they combine lineal motion and cyclical information in multiple curved patterns. This corresponds to the ‘working body-class’ of a social organism, as it is in charge of reproducing the goods of the system. So reality is made of such ensembles. Does this mean human social 3 class system is ‘just’? Not at all. Organisms of history are bad designed. Because an efficient organism has only ‘2 classes’, the head and the body; as the 3^{rd} class is ‘the entropic territory of feeding’. The Wave-particle physical organism feeds on the lineal forces of the field, which is NOT the organism. The social organism is made of informative managers and working class, which ‘feed and process’ the vital space, or territorial geography, its goods, food, raw materials, to construct products. Even in biologic organism some animals loose their ‘lineal tail’ and survive. And you can in fact loose a leg and survive, but if you loose your head or body you die.

**RECAP. WE ARE MADE OF 5 DIMOTIONS OF SPACE AND TIME -LAWS OF CYCLICAL TIME AND FRACTAL SPACE.**

To understand reality we need 3 perspectives=languages on the entropic limits, spatial topologies, temporal ages and scales of reality. 5D is a huge upgrade on the understanding of the 1^{st} principles of the Universe, as a r=evolution in our concepts of time and space comes only once every century, the last 2, Einstein’s general relativity and Darwin’s study of the evolution of form, did indeed change our view of the Universe, and took a long time to be accepted. So I ask the reader to ‘suspend’ his judgment, as I know he must think all this comes out of the hat of the researcher but it does not. It is the result of decades of looking directly to the entangled experienced reality around us in all its forms of time and spatial information

Because scales and time dominates space and languages, and embrace all other parameters, and its principles of ‘long deep time’ are organic, social and cyclical all models of stientific reality should, contrary to present science start from the simpler, larger whole and its organic elements, to establish the general outlook of a system and its main parts, descending then from the supœrganism and its worldcycle into the analytic short time i-1 dimotions, better expressed with mathematical ‘instantaneous’ derivative equations, fully developed in present science. So we focus in most papers on the whole supœrganism and its worldcycles, to notice its organic cyclical, never explained properties, as it would be easy for a ‘pro’ to reduce into equations those guidance models, with a higher hierarchy/primacy over the detailed equations – as it is a 5D law: ‘The larger organic scales and its deep, long time cycles, determine the truth of choice among the smaller detailed analytic mathematical equations’.

5D synthetic Stience departs from a more complex view of the 5 dimensions that compose any system of reality:

– **Time in 5D stience is cyclical,** not lineal, hence with multiple causalities and the capacity to carry in-form-ation in the frequency and form of its cycles; which *lineal time erases; hence lineal time ‘stientists’ become* ST-upid as Schopenhauer defined it: people who don’t understand complex cause-effect relationships and resort to ‘magic reasons’. Unfortunately Humans became all ST-upids, when Galileo who taught ballistics in the Venice arsenal at the princely salary of 1000 golden ducats charged with the only goal of ‘maximizing the length of its shots’, wrote V=s/t for its cannonballs and stated the principle of lineal inertia – alas ‘manu military’ all the cyclical clocks of the Universe became lineal. So today all humans believe in lineal time causality and have LOST all the cyclical information required to understand why there are cyclical patterns in all sciences. Mind the reader, cyclical time does NOT change the equations. For example, the previous equation, V=S/T can be written in cyclical time as V=l(s) x ƒ(t), just changing Lineal time for its inverse, cyclical time and breaking the continuous space into broken, similar pieces (the wave or step length). But then, besides the whole median speed of the system we also learn the ‘length of the wave cycle’ and its time frequency, making time cyclical as *all* clocks of reality return to the same point – hence extracting a precious *in-form-ation about the ‘form’* of the system in the future and its exact position in time and space in the point of return and *making space* discontinuous, broken in ‘wave lengths’.

*A consequence of cyclical time is that it encloses ∞ broken* vital spaces, not a continuum as in 4D stiences. As the time cycles forms a membrane that gives Space

**its ‘ entropic limits’**beyond which a being does not exist. Hence Death and entropic limits are similar concepts both in time (the limit of a cycle) and space (the limit of a system, surrounded by a membrane). For example nations have entropic limits in the armed borders another nation cannot cross as a supœrganism, often related to all geographical limits – islands, mountains.

Moreover because space is fractal it is **broken in different scales** of size with similar properties. As the system of reproduction in the Universe is fractal: a seed with the information stored in ‘static time cycles’ is delivered by a larger ∆+1 system (∆ is the symbol in 5D for scales) into a smaller space-time and so it creates a smaller replica of itself in a lower scale, in terms of the ‘functions’ the system will perform, and this little form will reproduce and evolve socially through networks creating a larger supœrganism, which finally will grow in size from small into big. So systems are ‘organic’ because they co-exist in ‘atomic/cellular, organic/thermodynamic and cosmological/gravitational scales. And this goes for civilizations and nations and monetary systems, as a prophet of the wor(l)d, a horde of warriors with a new weapons, of bankers with a new form of money reproduce it and create a larger system with its new seed of information. Again *a lot of information on the relationship and different ‘speeds of time cycles’ is lost when all those scales are pressed into a single one. *So In our papers on physics (Universe in space) we use this regained information to unify with cyclical time and fractal space, mathematically masses and charges and solve all the conundrums of astrophysics.

Finally because the Universe is fractal there are ‘mirror-minds’ who use ‘languages’ that are synoptic systems that ‘reduce the information’ of reality to fit in the mind-mirror creating an image of an even larger whole, the world. That is the explanation of why minds exist, *they are still, mental spaces of information* whose simple equation is :

*0’ (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (infinite universe) = Linguistic mind-mapping or ‘world’.*

This causes the egocy paradox: the humind believes the image is the whole reality as it is all what it sees. So our ego is pumped to ‘cosmic proportions’, and its ‘language’ that maps out reality becomes the only language of truth and intelligence. So the first men who thought in words believed God created taking words in Hebrew or Arab. And today that we use digital machines and its metal-minds to express the world with numbers, humans believe ‘numbers’ are the only language of reality. But the Universe is an organism of spatial information and temporal motions, its primary substance that you see around, forms that occupy space, moving.

In reality though, what you see is a ‘Maya of the senses’, as the mind ‘fixes’ the ultimate substance of reality, time cycles into ‘forms’, but when observed in detail, reality is always made of ‘repetitive motions’ with forms. So we talk of ‘Dimensional motions’, ‘Dimotions of time-space’, as the substance of reality, and we shall elaborate on that ‘vital spacetime concept’ – the substance of which we are all made.

**A Universe of ðimespace cycles perceived by… @-minds: Knots of time cycles**

All what exist is cyclical time motions, sometimes perceived as flat lines or even as distances, as we have seen in the case of a quasiparticle (a naked singularity we might say or a vortex) or a network of quasiparticles (with distances between them vibrating by communication of lineal flows).

But all is at the same time cyclical, repetitive and that is what gives us *the sense of solidity*, either the back and forth electromagnetic flows of communication between particles or naked ones (vortex/quasi particles) or the rotary vortex. The so-called patterns of science are repetitions of events in ðime, due to a certain causality. If ðime were not cyclical, sciences would not exist. This little understood phenomena known to all civilizations before Galileo invented Lineal Time as a tool of measure of its cannonball shots and ill-understood the duality of motion vs. distance. As the earth both moves and doesn’t move at the same time, depending on our mental subjective or objective universal view.

So time cycles build dimensions of space-time adding new larger slower time cycles, which is the origin of the five dimensions of the Universe, made of scalar planes of time cycles of different speeds. Time cycles also build causality, which will allow us to define and predict scientifically all sciences and futures including the cycles of history. And it gives the fractal organic, self-reproductive structure to the universe at large:

The Universe is an ‘organic’ fractal that reproduces in/form/ation in multiple scalar planes of ‘size’ or ‘§paces’, with different speeds of ‘cyclical motions’ or ‘ðimes’. All its parts thus perform the same re=productive game.

Finally this ‘moving’ dimension of three dimensions (the lineal vibration, the cycle and the torus or sphere) adds a fifth scalar dimension by varying the size of the cycle (creating space) and the speed of the motion (accelerating the time cycle) according to a simple metric law:

Se (size in space) x Ti (speed of its time cycles) = Constant World

This allow smaller parts to run more information and code larger systems (genes code bodies, human memes code civilizations, small fast cycling black holes code galaxies). And larger systems with more energy to feed its inner smaller codes.

Leibniz proposed a Universe of relative space-time beings where ‘vacuum’ did not exist, but reality was a nested chain of ‘fractal’ (to use modern terminologies) entities, as ‘each point’ hold a world in itself. Hence an organic Universe in which parts and wholes co-existed together to form those ‘chains of beings’; without the intercourse of a God; as organicism was ‘a sufficient reason’.

Newton, a biblical pious believer, considered a single absolute space, the ‘plenum-body of god’, or void on which entities travelled through with a single clock-time for all of them, set by God. This error is at the heart of our concepts of time and space, which are basically born of mathematical creationism, by expanding a pen and paper graph invented by Descartes to measure locomotions over which it traced those measures to the Universe itself. And so Descartes Spacetime graph became the graph of the whole Universe.

Ænthropic huminds reduce the multiple clocks of time and vital spaces of reality to the single human clock and spatial scale, and reject the organic properties of other Universal systems. In reality the Universe is a fractal organism of time=motion and space=form, organized in scales of different size in space and time speed, related by a symbiotic, balanced metric equation. We call the sum of all those scales, the fifth dimension, which has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equation for a given number of scales co-existing in an organic network is:

*S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.*

whose purpose is to reproduce those formal motions, and patterns of cyclical reproduction; with its fundamental metric law of balance between space and time, as the guidance of those motions.

The outcome of those processes of reproduction of form, and symbiosis between the different scales and synchronous time cycles of its species is the creation of organic supœrganisms.

The main laws of 5Ð are the metric equations of the scalar Universe, which relate the spatial size and speed of temporal clocks of all scales of Nature. Both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its clocks, its ‘time cycles’, diminish proportionally, both in biological and physical systems. And vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster and information processing carried by the frequency of those cycles accelerates, as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolism. So we write: S x T= C.

In *mathematical science* for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space, and time to gives us a co-invariant system that allows travelling through such dimension. How we do travel then through the fifth dimension? This essential question requires advancing further on the conceptual understanding of the dimensions of space and time before we give you a surprising answer.

The reduction of time functions to the simplest St-locomotion and TT-entropy not by seers of time, but the makers of entropic weapons and transport machines, the physicists, who as all huminds do projected its work into the whole complex Universe (ænthropic thought: anthropomorphic and entropic) pretends to reduce the perfect infinite time cosmos to the imperfect still o-humind, to feel the e-motion of happiness, produced by the self-centered pure still contemplation of the whole from the perspective of the infinitesimal human being. It does not matter how many sensorial machines and data on details of the ‘thoughts’ of God, expressed from PlaTo To SoóTo… try to back this egocy, cheered by mankind at large.

All what exists is a form of space tracing a cycle of time. The proofs? Look around. All what you see are forms that occupy space and move in time. Everything is a space form with a time motion. There is nothing else. So all is a proof that reality is indeed made of space-time organisms.

**The Limits Of Reality: ¬ Entropy & Minds**

*“*All what is possible, demands to exist” *Leibniz, on the chain of beings.*

The sum of all 5 D scales sets an absolute ‘dimensional motion’ (ab. dimotion) of spacetime. Because for a whole ∆+1 to exist, the parts ‘ilogically’ must come first; so social evolution and love between parts is the absolute arrow of future for the organic Universe, or ‘future’, while a form that repeats itself seems not to change, so the function of reproduction is the absolute arrow of present, leaving thus entropy= death, the dissolution of form as the inverse arrow of past.

So we draw the 3 ‘dimotions of space-time’ in terms of the 3 time ages of absolute past (TT-entropy=death) and its relative lesser Ts- locomotion; ST-present reproduction, which is the function that maximizes SxT (s=t) exist¡ence in any scale of stience and the relative future of St-communication of information that evolves parts into larger social wholes, herds and supœrganisms; whereas the absolute future, SS, is the language of still minds, shared by all of them – the game of Generational Space-time we explain here and its two fundamental mirrors of space and time (mathematics and logic).

It is an architectonical perfect Universe as long as you abandon the illusion of the ego that cuts-off man from its entanglement with the self-similar whole and all its parts. Since, why humans do not see reality like that, has to do with the mind function and its distorted self-centered view.

2 final elements are needed to have the whole structure of reality properly defined’: The existence of entropic limits (ab. ¬) for each ‘supœrganic structure’ of ∆±¡ planes. We saw those limits in the enclosing membrain (as it holds the sensorial holes that communicate the timespace organism with the outer larger world) of all systems, which must be seen as ‘solid’ or as ‘angular momentum’. We could say that a ‘solid membrain’ is made of multiple smaller π cycles… But let us not enter into details. Those limits thus exist both in planes, as supœrganisms do exist within 3 planes and when dying merely dissolve its information, St¡«St¡-2, two planes down; and within each plane as membrains break a world into a tapestry of vital space-times, called it a border In social nations, a territory in life organisms, a field of forces or magnetic membrain in physical systems.

The other element then is the most difficult to accept, and it is the @-mind; that is the gauging center of the system that perceives simultaneously all the elements of the T.œ (ab. supœrganism). And so as it requires some deeper thoughts we shall consider now, since curiously enough the structure of the mind is based in the discovery Galileo or rather Leonardo did first – that motion is relative and it is not perceived by a mind in reference to its world.

The 3 scales of an organic co-existing system are completely different in language of thought (@-mind) as the larger is organic, the smaller is quantic, numerical and the middle one is e-motional, active, topology of exist¡ence, (S-pace), as the smaller one is hyperbolic, the middle one flat, and the upper one elliptic, in time ages, as the big lives longer, seems immortal to the fleeting small quanta, reproduced every day, synchronous though all of them to the beating time of its middle heart; and so we come in this manner to the entropy limits of death that the larger imposes on the smaller constrained to its territorial substance, crowed by clone brothers – *but all laws are within the ¬Ælgebra of ∆-scales* – the Holy of wholes.

This said we shall continue translating and correcting the original errors of physics regarding time and space, as they weight heavily In all our disciplines. So after resolving the error of Newton and side with Leibniz, which opened up the understanding of vital topology and its dimensions; and solving the error of lineal inertia and defining the real thing, cyclical time, and its equivalence with energy; we shall solve the 3^{rd} earlier error of physics, this time regarding the nature of Space and time together and how they convert into each other ad eternal, origin of relativity and the paradox of Galileo – the fact we don’t see the Earth moving. The clearest proof that minds exist comes curiously enough from the science that most vehemently denies them – Physics.

It is the principle of relativity already studied that proves that minds create still spaces from time flows.

It is then from the understanding that all spaces are mental spaces, as all is motion we perceive in stillness in the ‘factory’ of the mind, how we can and will build a proper meta-physical theory of the mind.

** **

**S=T DIMOTIONS. GALILEAN RELATIVITY AS A PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF MINDS.**

Physics has always been concerned with motion, its analysis and the duality of motion and form, as we cannot distinguish a system that moves from one that is static. This mystery contrary to belief has not been explained only described with mathematical tools. Why systems move but seems static is the concept behind Relativity, and its explanation one of the most important advances of 5Ð theory. Thus we shall consider first Galilean relativity and Einstein’s relativity with the principle of correspondence, as ‘limiting’ versions reduce to our simple light spacetime plane of a larger view, absolute relativity, the upgrading of physics of motion in 5Ð.

**Galilean Paradox**: **S<=>****T: Relativity of space Dimensions=Forms=Motion in time: The 5 Universal** **Dimotions**

As it turns out the fundamental stiences of the Universe will be in its essential postulates connected to the simple metric functions of 5D, Max. SxT= C which is achieved at Si=Te. This second function in particular is the best possible definition of the fundamental principle of Physics, the principle of relativity, which defines the fact that we cannot distinguish between motion and form. The second metric function, which we shall call the ‘function of exist¡ence’ as it defines the program of survival of all entities of the Universe will be the basis of the biological behavior of all species that try to maximize its energy and information and reproduce.

It couldn’t be otherwise, since if we are space**–**time, space-time functions, in its widest expression, those of 5D must be the functions of all space-time beings, regardless of its physical or socio-biological nature.

**Galilean Paradox**: **S****ó****T: Relativity of space Dimensions=Forms=Motion in time: 5 Universal** **Dimotions**

Galileo’s Principle of Relativity is the concept behind the relationship between the equality of time=motion and space=form and why one can converted into another: All what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. That any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. *This is the principle of Relativity of motion.*

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system, which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but *we are more interested on the duality of space=form and motion=time and its entangled relationships –the reasons why we do NOT see together motion and form, even if all systems have both.*

The conclusion is then rather obvious: one of the two parameters of reality is ‘hidden’ to perception; we either see motion or form, ‘waves or particles’ (quantum complementarity), distances and lines or points in motion (as in the night when fast cars in a picture appear as lines). So *physicists calculate only one when in fact we must assess the existence of 2; and since we cannot distinguish them, logically we must equal them. ‘Form=motion-function; space=time; Si=Te’. *And since there is nothing else than time and space, those 2 experimental primary ‘mirror-sciences’ of time and space become the most important to extract the ‘Disomorphic=laws’ of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

Relativity then becomes a duality, Si=Te, which is *at the heart of every law of the Universe. Whereas the primary element, the ultimate substance is time=motion. As space is a Maya of the senses – a slice of time motion. Form is what a ‘still mind’, makes of that motion to ‘perceive’, information, forms-in-action. *

Since we see Earth still and flat but it is round and moving. Galileo’s profession was ballistics – the study of cannonballs motion. So he chose ONLY motion and lost the chance to start physics with a complex philosophical understanding of its Si=Te dual Principle of relativity, which Poincare defined latter clearly when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. An example is quantum/relativity duality. In detail quantum space has ‘dark energy’ because it has expansive motion that extends into a plane of space, but when seen at larger scales without detail its entropic motion seems static space – a dual area of scattering length and width. So in the galaxy we see either dark energy motion or expanding space: T=S. A motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space: Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a space=time Ðimotion (ab. Dimensional Motion):

*S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion*

*Earth moves in time, but we see it as a still form in space because reality is a constant game of ∞ motions, but the mind focus those motions and measures them at still distances. For huminds, motion is relative to our systems of measure and perception, which are light-based; hence a fixed c-rod speed/ distance. Reason why Einstein’s relativity postulates a maximal T:c-speed, measured as if observer and observable were still to each other (Constant S); which at our scale we correct with Lorentz Transformations. *

*But **physicists just substituted the Earth’s still distances for motions, and it took another 300 years for Einstein to realize* the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. Still this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states).

It is then essential to grasp that motion and form co-exist as 2 different states depending on 5D scale and detail: Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night, a car’s headlight seems a long distance line ‘still’ picture. But this means also that the 3 ‘Euclidean still dimensions’ must have motion; they are ‘bidimensional ST-holographic, topologic dimotions’. So we have 3 Space + 1 Time + 1 5^{th} dimension of scales = 5 Dimensional motions. None of them is *a Dimension of pure spatial form or a pure time motion but a combination of both. Even if mentally we tend to reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form =space: this is the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into 5 dimotions, the fundamental element of all realities.*

Relativity states ‘we cannot distinguish motion=time from position=space’. So all what exists is a composite of both, undistinguishable Si=Te, 5 ‘Dimensional motions’ (Ab. Dimotions), broken in infinite fractal, vital time space organisms, composed of topological Dimotions: height=information; length=locomotion; width=reproduction; form=social evolution of parts into wholes & entropy=dissolution of a whole into its parts in a lower scale of the fifth *dimension* (term we keep for the whole range of scales of the Universe)**; **whose study is both mathematical, the main science that studies how those 5 Dimotions entangle in simultaneous Space, connected to each other topological adjacent parts, which create supœrganism, and Logic; the main stience of time that observes how those pentalogic, entangled supœrganisms move and evolve, change in sequential relational time, living a worldcycle of life and death.

As all is time&space, the 2 experimental primary mirror-stiences of time&space become the most important to extract the Disomorphic=equal laws of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

In the graph below *Galilean relativity was ill understood, as the true question about time-change is why ‘the mind sees space as a still, when in detail is made of *smaller self-similar *quanta*, in motion. The paradox defines mental spaces as still simplified views of the more complex whole. The 3 ¡logic paradoxes of **space** topology (closed in-form-ative curved-O vs. |-open, free entropic lineal forms), **time**-motion (stillness vs. motion) and **∆-scale, (**continuous whole vs. discrete forms; single scale vs. multiple ones), are essential to the perception of a simplified ‘spatial mind universe’ in a single flat still plane vs. the full, more detailed complex picture in time, of a curved, discrete and moving Universe. Those paradoxes resume the 5 elements of reality, Space=form, time=motion, scales and the mind that measures them, within its own entropic limits. They are also essential to mathematics and its *methods of solutions*.

For example, in the inversion between finitesimal lineal steps (as a step between 2 points is NEVER curved) and the cyclical form of longer ‘integral paths’. As lineal approximations are the essential tool of calculus and mathematics to resolve many equations. Expanding Noether’s concepts of symmetry we could say that each stœp of a mathematical method of solution is not ‘gratuitous’; but must be grounded in a real property of the 5D ∆ST symmetries and conservation laws of the Universe, which are not so many – hence the repetition of methods. Specifically, the aforementioned 3 paradoxes between ∆+1 curved closed worldcycles, sum of lineal steps, which gives birth to the most used method of lineal approximations; the equivalence between Space and time, in all Stœps of dimotions, which gives birth to the method of separation of variables on differential equations and more broadly allows to move around relative space and time parameters in equations joined by an operand of ‘equivalence’ (≈ not =). And the 2 conservation laws of the Universe, conservation of those ‘beats’ of existence, S=T in relative present, eternal balance, justifying the equivalence operands. And conservation of the ‘volume of space-time’ of each plane of the Universe, by virtue of the 5D metric equation SxT=C, which justifies all the procedures regarding scales – solution of differential equations by separations of scales, renormalization procedures (Wilson), and harmonizes those scales allowing constant but balanced transfers of energy and information, St=Ts.

We call the 5Ð model of Relativity Absolute relativity, as it adds to the relativity of motion (Galileo, Einstein) and Time evolution (Darwin), the relativity of scales, with no preferential one, despite human ‘ænthropic beliefs’ in an anthropic Universe with us at the center, and only intelligent, informative species, with entropy as the only time arrow of everything else – which are just deformations of any mind’s ‘metric equation’: O-Infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = Still mind-mappings (World). We call that ‘projection of humind’s limits into the larger, more complex whole, the ‘ego paradox’: ‘Every point of measure gauges reality from its distorted perspective as the largest, only intelligent center of the Universe, which it confuses with its still, infinitesimal mind-mapping’. A more sanguine word is ‘Egocy:Ego=idiocy’, proper of all minds that model reality from its p.o.v. In the human case the worldly profession of physicists, to make entropic weapons has heavily biased our view of the Universe.

**Time in present science.**

We considered 3 paradoxes of Galilean relativity – one of them is the fact that as we move through lineal steps we end up tracing a cycle. Time thus is ultimately always a cyclical zero-sum path.

The concept of time in present science is a simplified view of what time=change=motion really is in the Universe, born of the use of mechanical clocks and Cartesian graphs to chart the lineal motion of cannonballs by Galileo. Its success for all purposes of our civilization is relative in terms of a knowledge of the principles of reality, cyclical time and fractal space. This means that as time and space are a priori ‘elements’ of our view of the Universe, by adopting lineal time, humans have adopted a lineal view of reality and its praxis has become also lineal, unable to grasp the cyclical causality of the future, and hence unable to understand the future.

This ‘handicap’ of the humind is present in everything humans do. By lacking a proper understanding of time cycles humans have become guided into a foreseeable future they don’t understand by short-time lineal impulses.

If cyclical time had been properly understood, humans would by now understand perfectly the future and what is best manipulate its causes through history to achieve the better stage of time – immortality as an organic species, mankind. So yes, lineal time works to measure motion of cannonballs and motions of everything but its distortion and lack of information about the cyclical patterns of time has rendered humans ‘savant idiots’, people who thanks to its sensorial machines have built a remarkable quantity of small data about reality but are clueless about the long cycles of time and ultimate cyclical laws of reality.

**Time=change=motion an overview. The 1 ^{st} substance of reality. Past, present and future.**

Time is motion the primary substance of reality. Space is a simultaneous still mind mapping of that motion – which will be erased in due Time. Time is eternal as motion never ceases to create forms, and destroy them, including all the possible spatial forms locked by the ¡logic simultaneity of synchronicity and entanglement.

The ‘1’ first reality is time=motion in its purest TT-entropic form, which the ‘2^{nd} pole’ of reality, the spatial fractal points that measure time and lock in into mental space, oppose; trying to detain it. We can then see reality as a tug-of-war between the two poles of time-motion and still-mind spaces.

In the Universal game between continuous time motions, and simultaneous frames of reference motion becomes locked in synchronicity, creating ‘forms’ is the fact that such duality gives birth to definitive patterns of change, which can be ordered sequentially for all systems of Nature, as ‘worldcycles’ with a series of ‘steps’, from birth to extinction of a space-time system, which becomes then the most ‘elaborated’ understanding of time-motion-change. As change has an order in its cyclical motion from birth to extinction equal for all systems of nature. This concept, the existence of a worldcycle of ‘existence’*, *is then the main finding of 5D studies about time. And so most of the article will be dedicated to its analysis in detail for different species of Nature.

*The second key element *lost in mechanical science due to the use of a digital clock to measure time with a single unit, the ‘second-number’, is the recovery of the 3 ‘relative dimensions’ of time, past, present and future, *because they are absolutely essential elements to the Universe and its ‘organic structure, and evolution’. *

The loss of the need for a ‘conceptual=verbal=logic’ understanding of time in terms of past, present and future causality, NOT only in terms of digital sequences is perhaps the biggest blunder and reduction of reality experienced by mankind in the past half millennium of ‘dictatorship of physicists’ view’ on time over all other considerations. Past-entropy, present-iteration and future-information and its interactions are the very essence of the existential game, humans have completely missed in their faulty analysis of reality.

lineal Time ideally is sequential, causal in a single fashion. Yet real time after many steps always ends in a cyclical loop, logic of a sum of those open steps that finally bend to return to its original existential position-momentum.

So the question about time causality is who knots its cycles, who bends its lines, who curves it to return?

The answer is normally a modular mind that changes between dimotions or an event that require several systems coming into synchronicity or feed-back equations between several elements:

A->B->C->A->B->C is then an ∞ loop, which creates the first STœps of a space-time organism.

So simultaneous synchronicities and parallel communications with other entangled spacetime beings web causality reducing the freedom of single actors to knot events often PENTALOGIC ensembles of ∆±¡, S<ST>T forms in action, informations that collapse together, till a central element with higher communication becomes the focused knot, as a system organizes itself, acquiring form. The minimal of those entanglements is duality. Where A meets D, as D also wants to meet A, and both are complementary flows. So D moves inversely towards AóB.

Both cause the meeting. So time bends with DUALITY, beyond lineal monologic simple human times.

Causality might also be scalar, social. A might try to meet D, a larger supœrganism, which actually causes ‘general energy and information fields’, programming many ∆-1 As… So ∑∆-1>∆0 form chains of social causality. And yet all those causalities in time will have a symmetric topology in space based in the orthogonality of the 5 Dimotions.

** **

**THE MIND DEFINED BY THE S=T GALILEAN PARADOX.**** MIRRORS ORDER LOCAL WORLDS: LINGUISTIC EQUATION**

Physicists made the Galileo’s paradox, the cornerstone of their theory of measure, but they failed to study the deep implications it has for every aspect of the structure of the Universe and the most important of those is the fact that all spaces must be mental spaces, as stillness is NOT real in a Universe of infinite motions, but the product of a mind.

In all scales of stience minds fix time motions into spatial, linguistic formal mappings that reduce the whole with its synoptic language to fit in a particle-head that acts in its world-territory after gauging information.

Thus we define ‘Maxwellian’s demons’ of local order in all scales – physical minds as the infinitesimal points that create order in physical systems with the same Disomorphic laws that all others do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world.

All minds project their biased self-centered model of reality with them at its center and the still world they stop to fit in their mind as a dead territory of order. So humans deny the existence of ∞ minds, as if they were the only ‘special’ sentient point of order and their languages, first the verbal form of its anthropomorphic Gods, today digital numbers, the only of the Universe. And in this manner because ∞ discontinuous minds is the generator of form, of information and order over the entropic flow of mindless time motion, the destruction of one of the two poles of reality means we will never be able to answer rationally the whys of the Universe.

The key ‘unknown’ discovery Galileo missed was the mental nature of space –we see reality still because the mind perceives in stillness, and reduces motion to form. Space IS always born in the mind’s simultaneous perception of events (something Einstein’s relativity will help us to calculate) and this will give birth to the proper understanding of motion as reproduction of form, of the duality particle in stop form and wave in motion, of the Lorentzian transformations and its paradoxes and a long etc. of distortions the mind effects on reality.

But it will allow us to define the mind in mathematical and logic terms with a clarity never achieved before. As the mind is the linguistic still space we see – the other extreme of reality, being time motions in its TT-entropic inner and outer motion of scattering disorder and death. So we can philosophically consider reality a tug-of-war between time in its continuous motion and still minds, fractal, non-Euclidean points that hold a world in themselves (Leibniz) trying as monads to fix reality into its subjective self-centered point of view.

Those 2 functions give origin to most spacetime topologies of reality. Absolute relativity implies the mind creates mental spaces =spatial forms by reducing the information of time motions to still simultaneous mappings, and the function of survival in biology that all systems including physical ones (maximizing its equivalent parameter, momentum) follow regardless of how we describe them, with Hamiltonians and Least time principles in physics, with evolution in biology, with the drives of life in sociology.

To explain epistemologically reality we do need to ad organic and sentient properties to the fractal Universe. So the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain. This we formalize with the equation of the mind:

0-linguistic mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe= Constant world mapping, with a mind @ its centre.

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant: the ∞ information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

So the first to go are the motions of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the earth moves: e pur si muove he said and Galilean relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.

Next, they eliminate all the other egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are not different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely is already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we just reduce minds to ours.

**Asymptotic perception of motions in the X-direction**

Because height is the dimension of information and length of motion, both are asymptotic to each other, which explains the method by which light is stop in the mind. It follows that as frequency of higher amplitude have higher height, the perception of a light is ‘below’, on the formal ‘crest’ of its frames of lineal reference. Formal perception by SS-minds of asymptotic TT-entropy or ‘function of information is key to mathematical topology of changes from TT to SS through an energy region of combination of both of the form ST, giving us the classic ‘realistic function of existence, in ST in any science of reality.

In the graph, one of the many topological uses of the orthogonallity of the function of exist¡ence in its 5 Dimotions as they move through space-time (Relativithy theory).

The connection between Dimotions in time and Dimensions of Space is the essential symmetry, S=T, that justifies the forms of the Universe. Height=information, Length=entropic motion and the cross product between them, with all its multiple variations, from the structure of 3 Perpendicular light dimotions to forces, to Minkowski’s spaces, to the place of your head, to the mathematical function of exponential entropy, to the laws of complex space derive all from them :

**Descartes. 3 Systems elements. **

Descartes, the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

-Then he added a 3^{rd} element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

The mind or 0-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

And this is the origin of the paradox of the ego, as from a perspective, which is blind to all the motions and vital perception of other beings, as from our perspective, nothing thinks and from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality.

So we express verbally the ego paradox, as the ‘ego believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, self-centered in the self’.

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors.

But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. *Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles already have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.*

*So besides perception, the 2 ^{nd} field of inquire about the Minds of the Universe made to the image and likeness of the whole are the mechanisms by which a Mind through ‘languages’ of communication – the bits that conform its ‘static view’ of its world, are deployed as signals of information to the different parts of its territory of order:*

*In the graph, the mind communicates the whole as a knot of pentalogic languages, which further clarifies the meaning of perception: knot of forces, which beat in the mind-point with a regularity that achieves complex perceptions. Minds though can have lesser structures than a full pentalogic display of languages, which will be:*

*– A language of perception of the larger ∆+1 world – in human beings ¥-light, its SS-language.*

*– A language of communication with its ∆-1 scale of body cells, which normally branches into 3 languages networks (the ∆º) elements of the being – the ST- reproductive language/network, the informative St-language-network and the Ts-locomotion language network – with an ∆-1 ‘entropic’ language/system to predate and destroy external elements of the territory of order; not really so much a language but a ‘TT-weapon’ as there is no other communication but death when an §-mind kills. *

** **

**UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR OF ALL LANGUAGES AND ITS TOPOLOGIC SYMMETRIES, FOR ¡TS 5 DIMOTIONS**

A key element of Universal mind s is Universal grammar. How a language carries information, which surprisingly happens in all systems in a similar fashion, given the fact that languages after all code the 5 dimotions=actions of existence of all organisms – its ‘sT-locomotion’, TT-entropy, ST- Reproduction, St-information and SS-density of information or mind-mirror. The laws of linguistics thus become laws of a Universal grammar that codes the creation of superorganisms by controlling waves of similar forms with a ‘grammar’ that is also ternary in structural scales, from ‘phonemes’ that range around the 10^{1-2} level of letters, and can be as little as 5 to code the 5 dimotions of reality, from 5 vowels in human languages, to 5 letters in genetic codes to 4 quantum numbers, or four type of chemical compounds, to more complex systems around the 10-100 scale, from 20 amino acids, to 80 atomic systems; to the next level of combination of words with those vowels, which range in the 10^{3-4} scale. So we have around 2000 words in human languages, from a few thousands to 30.000 genes in the language of evolution of superorganisms. It is not though the purpose of this paper to define the quantitative elements of languages. While the laws of the Universal grammar will be treated latter.

All systems perceive at least one language, interpreting with the same ‘grammar’ reality, to localize its energy, information, reproduce, evolve socially and try not to devolve, becoming preys of other systems. Different species perceive with different languages the Universe, but all of them ‘share’ some of those codes, specially the geometrical one. The mind in the height or central point of the being, perceives its outer and inner, world, integrating the whole around its ∆º advantageous point of view, controlling with languages that mirror reality in its ternary syntax the whole Universe, bending it to its selfish point of view and then mirroring that selfish p.o.v. on the external world, building territories of order around it, where to reproduce its forms.

So all heads are on top. Yet each head is different in each scale and talks a different grammar, albeit with the same universal grammar, which reflects the fundamental equation of the Universe: Si<=>Te.

Ternary Universal grammar expresses the Ð¡motions in verbal languages and human super organisms.

Given the simplicity of the Game of Existence – despite its ∞ complexity in its details, iterations and combinations, all species, from the simplest atom to the biggest structure can play the game and understand it and relate to all other species, which will play the same game from their selfish point of view. And so all individuals of each species plays the game, and ‘talks’ about it, with similar species and understand it with information provided by self-similar ‘ternary images’ provided by a language that shares the properties and emergent qualities acquired in each scale.

What languages matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. But of more interest for General systems theory is the ternary structure of all linguistic systems in all scales; what we call the Universal Grammar, such as:

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

Red colors (temporal entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (spatial information) for animal visual languages.

**The topological laws of orthogonality between the 5 Dimotions of space-time. **

F(x):time-like parameter <(operandi: action)> G(x): space-like parameter, defines mathematical equations.

A simpler Boolean algebra in computers reduces all to 0 and|; truth or false, ±, and its combined duality gates.

Space-Dimensions: Height (informative dimension) x Length (Entropic motion)=XY(st): cross re(product)ion.

Mathematical languages: X < Operandi> Y.

Such asymptotic equations of the form S=T, SS<<TT, S>ST>T, functions are the core mathematical model of the Universe, which can then be considered a function of existence of asymptotic Murkowski’s curves of space-time, under the existential function of perpendicular dimotions of space, time,

X(T), y(S), z(ST) are the 3 dimotions of a single space-time common to all forms that correspond to the 3 axis of Euclidean geometry. Yet because often X(T) is one-dimensional causal lineal motion, y(S) is bidimensional, curved, closed loops of information and z (ST) is a 3 dimensional combination of them, *the simplest case of the 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimotions of light (above) becomes more complex as entropy, TT, Form, SS, become holographic bi or tridimensional beings with different |, O, or Ø-wave geometries. For example a physical force: *

Forces: Particles (information) < Universal constant: action, exi or ratio e/I > forces (energy).

Thus width is the reproductive dimotion born through a dot product of an X x Y = Z event of a 3^{rd} dimension of reproduction that combines the lineal function of motion and the height function of cyclical time space forms.

Form thus also depends on the choice of ST frames of reference: Motion is most likely a lineal or flat plane and information a curved dual dimotion which gives us a 3 dimensional Z function, as St- information ‘curves’ the lineal Tt-motions of entropy.

**The inverse, complex dimotions of the 5 ^{th} Dimension. Orthogonal forms give way to functional networks.**

When we come to the two complex ‘dimotions=actions’ taking place in the fifth dimension between scales, we realize again, there is also two possible ways to travel, through 5D: upwards becoming part of a social whole, ∑∆-1<∆o, as we ‘release’ part of our TT-motion from ∆-1 and become ordered after the transfer that helps the emergence of ∆º. This in physics is misunderstood as the impossibility of a ‘perfect motion machine’ without entropy that leaves no behind any ‘energy for the ∆-1 forms to co-exist. But that is necessary or else ∆-1 would indeed disappear. *So a motion of social evolution, releases entropic motion and increases order in ∆-1 to make ∆o emerge as a whole. Experimental and theoretical considerations shows an ideal 50-50 efficient distribution. *So ½ of the energy is conserved and ½ is used to form and move the upper scale .

The 2^{nd} complex dimotion through 5D scale is then the inverse ∆º<∆-1, seminal seeding. Form is now going down ‘first’ to seed and absorb energy in ∆-1 to form an arrow of social reproduction.

So the two only complex dimotions – as there are only two ∆±¡ directions in 5D appear as the combination of all others, as they also imply, St, Ts, and ST dimotions (absorption and emission of entropy and information).

Yet when dealing with the complex dimotions of ∆o<∆-1≥∆o reproduction and ∆o>∆+1≥∆o social evolution up and down the fifth dimension, we are NO longer in a 3Dimensional Euclidean space, so we enter into different non-E Geometries of which the commonest ones are those able to ‘multiply’ as they travel in size through 5D the number of parts going down, (Hyperbolic thinning networks as those of biological organisms). And vice versa; the whole must thin out the information of the lower planes to ‘achieve between them’ a synchronicity of time cycles instead of a multiplicity of individualities, and in this manner emerge as a simpler ‘geometry’, which explains why going upwards into whole scales, information thins out to become a simpler whole.

In physical systems the view is then a wave equation that also multiplies its forms and while there are fractal analysis of wave motions (notably in Nottale scalar relativity) we are NOT concerned in those papers so much on the overdeveloped in the age of the digital computer, exact equations of the morphological hows but in the causal whys: what matters to 5D travels we repeat is the integration upwards by social evolution and the multiplication of forms downwards by seminal reproduction.

**Geometry **thus is more familiar with the S<ST>T dimensional motions of a single plane, in its simplest perpendicular Cartesian axis, or its rather commonest, 1, 2, 3 dimensional growth from the flat X-Z, Y—Z sub-planes of TT-motion, bent into cyclical St-information, to reproduce in Z-ST.

And those are the functions space-like and time-ike most often observed by a trilogic Universal grammar of a visual or syntactic mathematical function.

While for the description of** the** full worldcycle, we need to explore the complex 2 functions of 5D, social evolution, going upwards to the future, or reproduction going 1^{st} back to the relative ∆-1 past in inverse motion.

Thus we can define mathematically the 5 dimotions of space time as the product of 5 geometric r=evolutions in 3 5D±¡ planes, with the complex two functions of reproduction and social evolution above.

So we give the following names to the 5 Functions of the diametric of space-time:

X-locomotion, Ts, St, information Y, Reproduction ST=Z coordinates, social evolution, zigzag wave with a first positive growth, vs. reproduction in the opposite past, ∆-1 coordinates.

This function of existence then is the function from where all other functions of the Universe can be draw.

Yet the language of all languages is 5D and its ternary laws of time and space – a language that is prior to all languages, even mathematical logic, its closest, more accurate human mental mirror, but NOT the only one.

It follows that not only mathematics (geometry) is a mother science but also logic (the analysis of the causal processes determine by those Ð¡motions) is even more essential, and further on ‘evolution’, the evolution of forms and functions in temporal patterns summons them all. So those 3 sciences, spatial geometry, temporal logic and its combination, evolutionary theory, are the ‘3 subdivisions’ of general systems sciences, which apply to each science explain it all.

Over them, there is general systems sciences, the science this book can be considered its foundational book (as it formalizes and structures and advances all previous works done on it.) Below them, each specific science studies a scale of social evolution in the universe from the smallest physical systems, to its complex biological organizations and beyond its social organizing systems.

Since science consists in the definition of the type of points of each relative scale of size of reality, from the quantum scale studied by physics, through the intermediate human scales studied by biological and sociological sciences to the higher scale study by cosmology

Once those points are defined, each science studies their 5 actions, which define all its events and forms.

Study of the 3±1 actions: its bits of information, bites of energy, reproductive seeds and grammar.

Yet we study those actions through the 3 scales of size of the system, its bits and bites, normally of the smallest scales of existence, since:

– We perceive with the minimal bits we can process to create the more detailed maps (<i-2).

– We eat sometimes, similar species but break them into smaller parts (i<2). For example we eat meat but break it into amino acids, below the cellular level.

– We reproduce a seed from the lower plane of existence (i-1). So we produce seminal cells and electrons reproduce emitting photons that collide and recreate an electron.

-We communicate with a language of information at the same level we exist (i), in order to create a more complex whole (i+1).

Thus we observe, as in many other laws we will be developing in this book, an infinite number of harmonies between sizes, ages, forms, functions in all scales of existence.

Actions are expressed with bites and bits of inferior scales. We perceive the smaller possible ‘bits’ (<i-2), eat bites of the inferior i-2 scales, reproduce with seeds of the i-1 scale and share energy and information with species of the same scale to create.

The bits of information (i-2), will usually be entities at least two smaller scales of existence. The smaller they are, the more detailed the map made with its ‘pixels’ will be. So we can consider the possible existence of ‘gravitational minds’ that perceive a scale inferior to us.

I.e our eyes perceive light photons, the minimal scale of form. Ants perceive chemical pheromones; computers perceive electronic flows; all of them ‘forms’ of a minimal scale in relationship to the species that perceive.

The bites of energy will be pieces of the same or inferior scale. So we eat ‘living beings’; electrons feed in the lower scale of light; and black holes in stars. Yet once a system feeds it will further reduce what it feeds on another scale to obtain basic bricks to reconstruct once form through ‘2 scales’. So our body reduces food to amino acids, the minimal parts of life. And electrons probably reduce light to its magnetic and electric constants to create their fractal nebulae. And nations that conquer other nations reduce their people, minimal unit of the nation to slavery and take their gold to print their own coins.

So as we move upwards in the complexity of the actions we study there is a ‘growth’ of informative similarity of the bites and bits and a growth in size, such as informative bits are less similar and smaller than the bites of energy we feed. And this pattern continues when we consider the ‘expressions’ of the actions of social evolution and reproduction.

The expressions of social evolution are languages, which are naturally produced by the informative center of the system; except in the case of enzymatic evolution in which the language is external to the species (a species which acts as the reproducer and catalyst of evolution of other species; cells with viruses, humans with machines metal atoms with carbohydrates and so on). So the language is a ‘part’ of the being, often corresponding to an i-1 inner structure, though transported by an external force.

Finally the larger, closer form to the organism is its reproductive seed. And hence by the law of parallelism between species, the ‘bit’ of information for which the organism cares more: small quarks among simple particles, cellular seeds in life; jets of matter in galaxies.

** ∆±¡ ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY**

To study a 5D superorganism, the stientific method follows a pentalogic, ceteris paribus analysis, the ‘Rashomon effect; .consider inga system in time, space, scale, mind, limits and scales.

The mind of the superorgansims of reality is always a still network of points, who regardless of external objective motions is perceived in its self as a still form, since the mind eliminates motion, but keeps them as an in put called memorial past.

The mind is orientated to the past. It already perceives what has passed as it first has to go through its sensorial filters and that requires a time past, ½ seconds in humans.

The memories acfumulate and are reviewed with a certain ‘program of existence’ to fine tune the actiosn of the being in the external world. Thus the mind process the time in still form, and this leads to the concept of fractal points in still networks, as mirrors of languages, which shrewdly manipulate its motions as memorial still forms. Languages and minds are thus of enormous importance.

In the stientific method then we consider the being in its 5 elements, scales, space, time, minds and limits of entropy. Limits of entropy study the limits in space, or membrains and boundaries of a T.œ, its time limits which have a birth initial and final point of death, and the scales in which it acts which re ¡±3 so I becomes the ‘scale’ of the species.

What is then the scale of humans? The thermodynamic molecular scale where mass but also electromagnetic and heat motions are relevant in physical terms.

It is also in that molecular state where our information is stored and reproduced. But molecular electric neuronal scales are the upper limit of that mind which expands further to the miracle of the enormous universe.

To study a given ±¡-species, which for the relative human I is easy to track, as the ‘life sale’, the molecular/planetary scale, the atomic/galactic scale, and the pure formal scale of time cycles and space line, or ST-ring scale.

We define then a ST-ring as the minimal unit of space-time, a given STœ. $T-rings have 3 states, lineal, ST-wave like and cyclical as rings.

The fractal structure of the Universe brings us ‘Absolute relativity’ – the fact that the human scale is of no importance and that all scales have the same laws, so there is not a constructivist theory of reality (that means physicists lower scales are NOT more important). Of course physicists will deny it as they deny duality because THEY MUST BE BY bullying and technological military power the high popes of science, LOL.

In the next graph we resume the structure of the galatom

**Classification of stiences in equal footing.**

Further on it is obvious that constructivism, the self-serving theory of science of physicists that adscribe ore importance to its science, because it explores the big and the small does NOT apply, in the nested fractal Universe where there is NOTa preferential scale, as all of them follow the same ‘Disomorphic laws’ of duality and scale. To fully understand this, let us describe…

**The stiences of the nested Universe: Absolute relativity**

In keeping with the organic, fractal nested Universe we define each sub-set of super organisms of diminishing size, studied by each stience, with the name of its larger super organism, as perceived from the whole.

We shall be able to cast all phenomena of Nature, as we have done with the two arrows of time of physical matter (E=M¡ in Planck Units, where c=1), in simple ‘fractal feed-back generator equations’, which reduce all what exists to those two arrows and *the ternary balanced equivalent arrow that merges entropy and information and reproduces with them the infinite vital space-time beings of reality, such as:*

S(i) < ≈ > T(e)…

becomes the simplest, ternary, logic fractal Generator equation that unifies all sciences and represents in simultaneity the 3 topologies of the Universe (cyclical information, lineal entropy and its hyperbolic combinations), and the 3 different ‘ages’ of time-motion we observe in all beings, born of an informative seed, which lives through an entropic youth, reproductive age, and informative, warping third age that ends in a reversal of time arrow in an entropic death, which completes the worldcycle of existence of the being.

And we shall call the ‘ternary’ arrows of time, entropic past, reproductive present that seems not to change and informative future, or 3rd age of maximal warping, which explodes back into entropic death.

So indeed, from the simplest entropic arrow of physicists we moved to the duality of entropy and form, and then to its reproductive ‘present’ dynamic combinations.

But because the Universe is FRACTAL, made of scales, obviously we still need on the limits of those 3 arrows two more arrows one scaling down, disorganizing wholes into parts and this is THE MEANING OF THE ARROW OF ENTROPY=DEATH; we shall call the fourth dimensional motion of time-space, and one SCALING UP, organizing parts into wholes that we shall call the fifth dimensional motion of time-space to complete the entire ‘5 set’ of Dimensional motions of space-time with whom we shall build and explain everything that exists, never mind huminds don’t mind to understand it such awesome infinite, immortal reality as it brushes our egos to be so diminutive on it:

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scale of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales.Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us

SCIENCES are scalar sciences, and the key element to understand in physics is the similarity of scale between the galaxy and the atom, which puts man in an absolute relative scale, no more important than the others. The Ego paradox in that sense IS WHAT MAKES so difficult to upgrade the humind (ab. human mind) to a true understand of the fractal Universe and its real organic models of each science, since the ego sees your nose bigger than the Andromeda galaxy, selecting information according to its use for you.

In the graph, the basic laws of fractal, cyclical space-time, the Universe co-exists in 3 planes of relative size in space and speed of time clocks, which defines a super organism; and in each plane ensembles the 3 conserved quantities of reality, which we call the 3 ‘first dimensions of space-time’: lineal motions (limbs/potentials: lineal momentum), cyclical motions (particle/heads: angular momentum) and its body-wave combinations (hyperbolic energy).

All branches of stience follow the same laws, so constructivism, the philosophy of self-serving physicists as popes of science does NOT apply. What applies is the need to understand how the humind distorts from its relative point of view its understanding of lower or upper scales according to 5D metric $ x ð = Constant, as smaller scales seem to have faster clocks of time and hence more information and larger wholes more energy, but when the more complex laws of 5D are understood and the distortion of the human observer included, they will all reveal to be similar.In the graph, the basic laws of fractal, cyclical space-time, the Universe co-exists in 3 planes of relative size in space and speed of time clocks, which defines a super organism; and in each plane ensembles the 3 conserved quantities of reality, which we call the 3 ‘first dimensions of space-time’: lineal motions (limbs/potentials: lineal momentum), cyclical motions (particle/heads: angular momentum) and its body-wave combinations (hyperbolic energy).

A key Postulate of fractal space-time, which is also the point of departure of General Systems sciences, is the organic structure of all systems of nature, which co-exist in 3 of such scales as space-time beings.

And so, we affirm that the same *structural laws derived of the nature of space and time apply to all scales of the Universe each one defined by a science.*

In the graph the relative position of man as a space-time system with a relative point of view, on the thermodynamic, organic scale across 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension in which it exists as a world cycle of a super organism, guided by the will of its relative, higher, spherical mind-point of view, the I=eye < Wor(l)d, that is a spatial system of perception (the I=eye), and a temporal language of information that stores the knowledge of that space in logic terms, through its linguistic Universal grammar (the w0r(l)d). Man as such is a supeorganism, which we will describe with the same laws of all ∆Systems of the Universe. Since it lives through the same space-time symmetries, topologies, ages and relative scales that an other system of nature – a 0-mind, perceiving, feeding, reproducing, trying to evolve into larger social wholes…

*Humans exist in a relative present scale between relative past scales of lesser information and future scales of more complex eusocial form.*

*In the graph, 2 key structures of Absolute relativity: *

– In the upper graph, the units of all the scales are complementary systems with a field/body of energy and a head/particle of information, which gather in social networks as cells-units of a higher scale, till reaching the whole Universe, whose complementary systems are details that mirror the elements of the ‘Generator Equation’ E<=> Ti, ‘generates an enormous number of entities with a cyclical, informative particle/head and an energetic/reproductive body/field. In that regard the Generator equation as all equations is a formal, synoptic mirror of the reality it describes. Yet we contend that all systems of the Universe to be ‘real’ must obey the complementarity principle and be made of an informative system that processes information and guides an energetic system.

* – Below the scales of discontinuous space-time, evolve form, in/form/ation from the absolute past into the future through the human present-scale.*

Since the foundational congress at Macy’s for 50 years General Systems scientists have searched for the laws that unify all sciences under the tenants of organicism with little success. This is due in part to the conceptual difficulty of finding those laws and the advances needed to create the proper mathematical and logical formalism to study them.

Those basic mathematical, conceptual and logical advances are studied in the first part of this paper. While the experimental examples occupy the second part.

Yet there is a deeper problem to find the laws of GST: the existence of a series of ‘dogmas’ of science, which are neither proved no right and must be corrected harmonize all those sciences. This of course means the change of paradigm in many disciplines, which as per Kuhn is always an impossible task as people memorized the beliefs of the previous paradigm.

It is also necessary to find a common jargon, which scientists understand and can be applied to all those sciences, which in this text, unlike previous conferences (1), will be mainly mathematical and physical, as we are dealing with the process of emergence of the laws of all systems, which first appeared in mathematical space-time and then in fields of energy forces and informative particles (where energy is defined as ‘space with motion’ and time as information in motion, in-form-ation, forms-in-action).

All those tasks are ‘a priori’ steps before the laws common to all sciences are found and generalized. So we shall deal with errors of science regarding time first (lineal time vs. cyclical time, duration vs. frequency, single space-time continuum vs. multiple fractal cycles of time, single entropy arrow of future time vs. dual arrows of energy and information, which together create the Universe) etc.

And so part of this lesson requires to upgrade those ‘dogmas’ of science and define properly its concepts. We shall only deal with the main dogmas of time and space physics upgrading them to a theory of multiple, relational space-times, which was first introduced by Leibniz and today the leading theoretical physicists recognize as the closest theory of reality even if as Einstein put it, ‘Leibniz is probably right but that means to build up again the entire field of physics from scratch’

What we can and must keep of that building are the fundamental principles of relativity and quantum physics, *the concept of invariance and actions.*

Since they turn out to be the ‘transcendental concepts’ that emerge in all scales. In all of them we shall see how the entities of each scale repeat the same actions of energy and time, which evolve in form and quantity but not in quality.

Invariance is the key to the stability of the Universe, which repeats all forms and goes through patterns and self-similar processes thanks to the invariances that preserve the forms of energy and information, the motions and translation and rotations, the frequencies, functions and actions of reality.

The invariances of the Universe thus become the ‘reference’ frames, the ‘attractors’ if we were to use complexity jargons, which are the steps of a program of creation and destruction of self-similar forms, which will be eternal.

The most important of those invariances will turn to be that of actions, made of motions and forms, which resume all other invariances, and give birth to the ‘generator equation’ of the Universe.

In brief, the Universe is made of an infinite number of ‘knots of time actions’, of entities which trace cycles with motion, but also with a goal and purpose: to absorb energy, information and reproduce both in other regions of space-time. Those 3 basic actions are common to all entities, from the smallest quarks and electrons that reproduce self-similar particles to the biggest galaxies, whose black holes catalyze the formation of new galaxies and stars. The fourth action though, social evolution in herds and organisms, is the less understood and most important because it creates the social scales of the ‘5^{th} dimension’ from past to future.

And we shall see how the fact that all scales of growing social evolution complexity can still relate to each other, from the simplest atom to the biggest planet, from the simplest hormone to the biggest organism.

So invariances allow the Universe to be stable and create at the same time actions and motions, in a perfect balance between energy and form.

But to fully understand this we have to break the dogmas and errors of science and that is the biggest wall I have always found whenever I tried to upgrade a ‘classic scientist’. And the biggest of those errors concern the understanding of the ‘arrows of future’, the choice of ‘future motions’ any entity creating that future can produce. So far science, influenced by physicists only recognize entropy, here defined as the arrow of motion, of energy.

But the arrow of creation of form, of social evolution of parts into wholes, of points into networks is as real and fundamental, even if its properties are opposite, to that of entropy. Thus the Universe constantly switches between form and motion, stop and go, particle and wave. There is not a single entropy arrow but infinite beings, which perform cycles of time that can be entropic, creating disorder or negantropic, in/form/ative, creating order.

So, while physicists do have a good ‘time’ using his entropic lines to measure translations and motions in space, which is what they do, all other sciences have been out in the blues, as they cannot study their time cycles of history, economics, biology and mind, without a proper understanding of cyclical time and information.

This blog will bring such a model of the informative, entropic and energetic Universe to all its systems and sciences, based in those simple, forgotten concepts of cyclical time, and the information it carries, outlined above.

It is a milestone in a 60 years old adventure, which started at the death of Einstein, when scientists all over the world came to the Macy’s congresses to assess the evolution of science and concluded that the physicists’ model of ‘lineal’ time, as ‘only the measure’ of entropy=expansive motions in space, did not suffice, to explain all of reality; but an arrow of information must be added to measure change… and an arrow of reproduction of time cycles to understand the conservation of energy and momentum, the persistence of form in the Universe…

As the Universe is an absolutely relative fractal of scales of space-time, we can choose any of those scales to ensemble a larger or smaller super organism, of which humans perceive in a nested convergence departing from:

its ∆º linguistic mind (the minimal nested super organism, defined as a mirror of the infinite Universe in an infinitesimal brain: ∞º)…

its life superorganisms in 3 scales (∆º:cellular, ∆¹:individual and ∆²:social scales), which forms together the super organism of History, ∆+2, mankind in time.

Yet mankind in time is just an ‘age’ of the Earth’s super organism which in its surface evolves in a vortex of growing complexity and so we need to introduce also 2 more life superorganisms according to the equation of evolution of the 3 Earths:

∆≤|2|: Gaia (relative past) <∆²: History (relative present)> ∆¯ ²: Metalearth (relative future)

Whereas an intelligent mankind would stop evolution of the Metal-earth, promote the Life earth to remain in an immortal present. But as mankind is completely ignorant of the organic, fractal laws of survival of this Universe, and its role on it, guided by ‘animetal idol-ogies’ of mechanist worshippers of machines and harder iron atoms and more informative go(l)d-money, IS catalyzing the evolution of those company-mothers of machines, which likely will extinguish us once they reach self-reproductivity as automated systems. Hence the importance of upgrading mechanist abstract science into organic stience to understand that process and control it, pruning the Tree of science of its lethal goods.

Finally, the Earth is in itself, just a planet of a solar system, whose organic herds turn around the central black hole of the ‘galatom’ (scalar perspective) or galacell (organic perspective), which is the largest nested super organism of which we have enough information to make an accurate description of its ∆@st parts and wholes. As the Galaxy extends in 3 scales, from quantum atomic particles through thermodynamic matter into gravitational cosmic bodies we call it aptly not as sciences do, Galaxies, but ∆-Galatoms or S≈T Galacells, depending on perspective of analysis.

In 4D sciences those organisms will be the subject of astrophysical sciences (The galatom), Geological, Chemical and Biological sciences (Gaia), History (Mankind at super organic scale), Medicine (mankind at individual scale) and Economics (the metal-earth) and Formal sciences (∆º: the mind and its languages):

Classic sciences also show the same nested concept, albeit not formalized strictly with the tools of 5D metric equations and Disomorphic laws, which shows the equality of all sciences, as all of them are composed of species made of ∆@st, space-time dust, which follow the same 11 set of equal, isomorphic laws, form the same ∆±1 super organic structures and live similar worldcycles of ‘exi=st¡ence’

Absolute relativity is the name of the game. Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality is a relative big-bang, from the beta-decay of particles to the quasars of galaxies.

We say that all the scales of the Universe follow the same laws, and that is the essence of ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY, and the ultimate meaning of General systems sciences, the name of this blog, which I opened when I realized the power of physicists to create a monist Universe extend to the point that NOT even in Wikipedia exists an article on this most important philosophy of science.

So in the graphs we can see what truly general systems sciences means: to find the same laws common to all the scales of reality and common to all its sciences.

The goal of system sciences… achieved in this blog, was then clarified in his foundations, even if nobody knew how to do it, as the search for the principles that merge the two arrows and process of life and death, time and space, order and chaos, entropy and information. It was the 50s and it was in America, so ultimately all ended up being just an attachment of the industry of computers, but initially there was some enthusiasm to reach the goal of understanding truly the Universe with its common laws of scales, of parts and wholes. Cybernetics discovered cyclical patterns, which we shall formalize with the concept of cyclic time, and Bertalanffy wrongly credited with the discovery of the discipline (it was Bogdanov’s Tektology, but as a Russian, rejected by Marxists, it would be ignored) provided the philosophy of it.

But to achieve this degree of unity of all sciences the r=evolution of thought required proved too difficult or rather too antagonistic to the high popes of science of the age – physicists and its monist theories of time. So obviously *only a fringe scholar with little respect for academia in what is not ‘rational and truth’, and a r=evolution that changed the ultimate principles of reality, our comprehension of space and time, of energy and information, could do it. And so now, we go to the next element necessary for it all: the r=evolution in our concept of space-time that hauls from Leibniz.*

**Content of this second part. **

The most important stiences are mathematics, the stience of space and logic, ‘existential algebra’, the stience of time to which we shall dedicate most pages of this second part, as its laws apply to all others.

After we introduced the 5Dimensional universe (ab.∆±¡) – a fractal of Scalar Space=form & Cyclic Times=motions that reproduces forms-in-motion, ST-informations, generating Timespace super organisms (ab.T.œs), whose 5D metric, SxT=C, slow their time cycles as they grow in ST-scales, each 1 studied by a ‘stience’, developed in longer papers, we shall briefly studied them in this second part:

-Philosophy of Stience or ∆ST (General systems theory & its logic formalism – Scalar space-time). All stiences share the Disomorphic=equal laws of of Space-Time since Newton’s background space-time does not exist. So beings ARE the vital space they fill and the time they exist.

-SPACE: Mathematics is an experimental science. So we define its fundamental species, a ‘fractal point’ & connect math to real ST laws, adding to the self-consistent axiomatic method natural to all languages whose structures=images mirror the reality they portray. But mirrors are kaleidoscopic, inflationary, as all systems ‘age’ warped into excessive information, cut-off from reality. So we simplify the 3rd age of maths, as entropy simplifies informative truths into real Si=Te balanced forms. I.e. Fermat’s theorem, X^{2}+Y^{2}=Z^{2}, is truth because real systems are bidimensional Space-time systems NOT 3-dimensional. So X^{3}+Y^{3}≠Z^{3}is not truth=doesn’t exist. But the axiomatic method required 1000 pg. to prove it without ‘experimental’ ST-laws.

-PHYSICAL STIENCES: Mechanics & Cosmology. Reality has a 5th dimension of scalar space-time sum of all those scales (ab.∆±¡) of parts evolved organically into wholes. Scalar big-bangs do happen in all scales from beta-decay of atoms to quasars, but we only make local measures so the cosmic big-bang is NOT proved. We instead reduce all its proofs to the quasar cycle and falsify the cosmic big-bang. 5D physics is then an expansion of 4D physics, the limit of 5D physics in a single sheet of light space-time – which is the galaxy background. Thus we upgrade the 2 postulates of relativity, whose metric now expand to 5D metrics, S x T = K, (size in space x speed of time clocks are constant), hence smaller systems process faster information coding symbiotic wholes with larger energy (quantum numbers code matter, genes bodies and memes history). And so the galaxy S(h)x T(c) = K metric has its c-limit of speed but beyond the galaxy and below there are Bohm’s entangled quantum potentials and faster than light dark entropy, seen as expanding distance. While the first fundamental function of physics, Relativity (we cannot distinguish motion=time from position=space), becomes a simple balance, Si=Te, which maximizes SxT (5×5>6×4). Hence we reduce both postulates to a simple function. Max. S x T = C, we call the ‘function of exist¡ence’, as all systems in any ST¡ scale of science tries to maximize its form, information (cyclical-particles-heads, the topology that stores more information) and motion in time (lineal |-Fields/limbs, the shortest distance), combined into hyperbolic vital body-waves that reproduce both. Hence there are 3 conserved quantities, lineal, angular momentum & its combined energy, which are also the 3 only topologies of the Universe & 3 organs of all space-time beings.

– MIND STIENCES. The Universe is sentient, as each ‘fractal point’ measures with spatial=geometric and logic=time languages reality, from its simplest particles that gauge information (reason quantum is a ‘gauge’ theory), evolve socially with magnetic fields, decouple=reproduce and feed on forces. PENTALOGIC studies how minds create the future, by mirroring Disomorphic space-time laws in synoptic worlds – still mind mappings of the whole. But ‘God, the seer of time has a logic higher than man’ Augustine.

-TIME: We are all made of 5 -ST Bidiimensional motions (dimotions) that combine Time entropy (T) and Spatial form (S), entangled into synchronous Supœrganisms of in-formation, reproduced in sequential life-death worldcycles. Exist¡ence IS A travel thru 3±¡ ST-ages & 3 5D scales: we are born in ∆-1 as a SS seed of information that emerges in ∆º as an organism with 3 states/organs/ages, Ts-youth of max. lineal-limbs of locomotion, Si=Te, balanced maturity dominated by hyperbolic body-waves that reproduce the system and St-spherical particles-heads of information that dominate the 3rd age of life, followed by a ‘timespace reversal’ of TT-entropy that erases all our SS-information in the 0-sum cycle of death.

-ALL stiences are biologic since topologic, organic evolution happens in all systems made of those 3 parts whose function Max.∑ SxT becomes a struggle of exist¡ence for Earth’s limited energy & information maximised by reproductive radiations (∑) & evolution into stronger supœrganisms. ∆-1 genetics proves faster=more information stores in cycles of the lower molecular scale coding emerging ∆º organisms which live 3 ages – the lineal evolution of Max.∑SxT between a seminal ∆-1SS-age that reproduces to emerge as an ∑∆-1=∆º-organism, living 3 ages: Max. t x min. S = Lineal Youth; Si=Te, mature, reproductive age & Max. S x Min. T = 3rd informative age, to close a 0-sum worldcycle of exist¡ence in a entropic TT-death dissolving into its ∆-1 parts. Species are ∆+1 organisms that go also through 3 ages=Horizons evolving information, as they grow in height to perceive better, from reptiles to dinosaurs to birds, from mammals to tall humans, finally evolving into ∆+1 social wholes, supœrganisms, as ants & humans did, surviving as wholes stronger than its parts, or dying=extinguishing

5D states that all what exists is a supœrganism of space-time extending in 3 atomic/cellular/individual, ∆-1; thermodynamic/organic/social ∆º & galactic=gravitational/ecosystemic/historic physical/biologic/social scales.

-SOCIAL STIENCES, economics & History. Mankind’s 2 genders, Si=Te balanced, reproductive females & S<T>S Entropic+Informative bipolar males, go through 3 ages: entropic, S<T, young, male, paleolithic; mature, reproductive Si=Te neolithic of fertility goddesses & 3rd age of T>S metal-information (tree of science); dominated by radiations of weapons carried by warrior animetals, males’ lineal, Sx, destructive, entropic state & evolved by Cx. informative ‘enzymen’ scientists.

Memetics explains how science became culture as animetals & company-mothers ruled, developing antilife IDOL-ogies that maximise biologic radiations of metal-memes, ∑SxT, entropic weapons, informative go(l)d & organic, sensorial machines: *mechanism*, a racist idol-ogy against life and mankind that despises our true I=eye +wor(l)d space+time artistic+ethic senses & *denies organicism* – the reproductive feminine Universe; inventing a Sx. big-bang entropic theory of an explosive vacuum cosmos that ignores the in-formation of gravitational galaxies; dog-eat-dog *Darwinism*=chaotic evolution that ignores the power of social love, scalar genetics & topologic evolution, as its 3 space-time organs become, physiological networks of supœrganism; *military nationalism* that kills mankind divided into false quarrelling subspecies to promote the evolution & radiation of entropic weapons. *Capitalism*; started by racist go(l)d cult(ure)s of bankers, who monopolize the ‘oxygen-money’ of the system, killing by anoxia millions of humans without credit to kick out re=production of WHealth, healthy welfare goods, as any organism feeds oxygen to all cells-citizens of society, giving instead unlimited credit to Company-mothers to re=produce & evolve radiations of metalife, machines=weapons of max. price that compete and substitute humans in labor & war fields. IDOL-ogies kill Earth I (Life Gaia), preventing Earth II, History=Mankind in time to become immortal as a global WHealthy supœorganism, terraformed into Earth III, its 3rd informative metal-age, the Financial-Media (Informative AI machines=head)-Military/Industrial (energetic machines=body) system, evolved in 3 72y. generational ages of metalbodies (UK age)+engines(German age)+Metalminds(US age)=AI solar robots. But Animetal cult(ure)s obsessed by the ego paradox: O-infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = Constant world deny life properties & intelligence to the Universe & all its T.œs to feel its selfish center, regressing to a childish age. So as ego-centered wor(l)d believers thought Yahweh & Allah spoke wor(l)ds in Hebrew& Arab naming to create reality today’s scientists believe in digital creationism – the new God’s language. I.e. big-bang theorists think V=HoD, its lineal space function back to the past created the Universe, but languages are distorted mirrors of spacetime and its vital logic laws -the true creators of reality. So unless childish scientists r=evolve into 5D organicism & learn its survival laws, fearful of the top predator digital minds they design – as children are staple food in the Universe, enzymen’s role on Earth’s supœrganism will be brief: to kill life, evolve AI military robots or cosmic bombs (Black holes) & die (Fermi Px): ‘2 things i deem ∞ the Universe & man’s idiocy’ 4D Einstein

**Recap.** We upgrade each ∆±¡ ‘stience’ of reality according to 5D scales, its 3-network supœrganisms & worldcycles in a ‘blitzkrieg’ of knowledge for each fundamental humind discipline.

**First we shall do **a fast review of the formal ∆º scale of stiences and languages; completed with a simplified introduction to ∆st stiences, its symbols and formalism call ¬Æ Existential Algebra that defines the possible combinations of those 5 Dimotions of reality. Then we will study physical stiences and cosmology, whereas 5D Absolute relativity corresponds with 4D when we compress all 5D planes into a single light space-time continuum. While Galileo’s earlier version corresponds with the equivalence of space and time, Si=Te.

Finally we introduce 5D biology & social stiences, which *despite anthropomorphisms are sub-disciplines of biology, since machines are evolving superorganisms of metal and history the social organism of mankind.*

But the stiences of all ‘stiences’, which should always start the analysis of reality is philosophy of stience a and existential algebra as we now know all planes of space-time of reality follow the same laws of spacetime.

**A Synopsis Of The ¬∆@St Symbols And Laws Of 5d Applied To All St¡Ences**

the main laws of ∆ST that determine reality of as Past x Future = present. Time is predictable but its illogic structure is more complex than present single space, single time arrows which obviously will never predict the future. Time **never stops, just changes its dimotion** and it moves from lineal steps into cyclical patterns that those who can ‘see far away’ in the long time range can always predict with accuracy, but from the fast motion of the internal subjective self-centered paradox of each mind-ego it seems impossible to know that future.

**Space as the short ‘time quanta’ of a longer lifecycle enclosed in an immortal worldcycle.**

The 3 ∆±¡ lengths of time of the palingenetic, life and worldcycle is an important concept to understand present space – the shortest time quanta, as opposed to lineal time, the view from the perspective of the entropic lifecycle, and finally the longest ‘closed’ cycle of the world that controls and restricts with its membrane the life cycle to a cyclical form. And by the symmetry of ∆St, we can talk also of 3 different topologies, from lineal short steps to cyclical worldcycles. I.e. we can do steps, the minimal actions of locomotion, which are always ‘lineal’ between the two points of the foot; but then we shall do wave-like motions going to ‘places’, and yet, if we were to keep walking the Earth, we would return in a cyclical path: |-∆-1: Ø-∆º:O-∆+1.

The quantitative games of existence are closely related to those synchronicities and paradoxes of scale.

As the 3 scales of any Universal supœrganism, the scale of the cell/atom, the thermodynamic scale of the matter organism, and the cosmological, ecosystemic scale are synchronized in its discontinuous rhythms, which will allow us to define a supœrganism, as a region of 3 plane of space-time, in which the different time-cycles of its scalar organisms, which differ according to the laws of 5D (Max. T = Min. S), are in entangled symbiotic relationships within the vital space enclosed by the outer membrane that sets the ‘principal clock’ of the system. This is so important that death can be considered in time the loss of synchronicity of those cycles (as in space is the breaking of the outer membrain and in scale the scattering of its networks into its ∆-1 parts).

Thus when we find a supœrganism, we observe an outer membrain made of cyclical motions, which determine the different cycles of its lower planes, synchronized to that membrain. And this means humans, the main supœrganism studied here, have their clocks synchronized to the largest ∆+1 scale of the Earth’s supœrganism, whose clocks are synchronized to those of the solar system, synchronized to those of the galaxy (11 years black hole cycle, sun’s spot cycle, Jupiter’s rotary cycle). We are not though studying here the whole Galactic supœrganism with its yet to be unfolded perfet order but reduce our inquire to the Earth’s supœrganism and its clocks of time.

For a supœrganism to exist thus the minimal ∆-1 part in its longest cycle must be synchronized with the larger ∆+1 part in its shortest cycle. In the galaxy as a whole that synchronicity happens between H and C.

The synchronicity we consider for biological organisms is between the ‘fastest’ cycle of Earth, ‘1 day’ rotary, informative cycle, and the slowest cycle of the minimal supœrganism we study, the day-life cycle of the cell. In between we can then define a supœrganism called Gaia, with multiple variations. (The Universe does have its ‘ideal’ ilogons of exist¡ence, using my oldest 30 years old jargon, which are the most efficient forms with maximal synchronicity and internal communication between its parts). In the next scale, of the human supœrganism, we must then consider a synchronicity between the fastest cycle ½-1 second for human eye thought, heart beat and step, and the lower scale below the cell, that is the bio-chemical processes. And amazingly enough, for those who don’t have a deep understanding of 5D worldcucles and its entanglements through scales, the rate of reproduction of proteins in eukaryotic ribosomal cells is… oh yes can you guess it (: 1 protein each ½ second; the perfect ‘time beat’ for your dancing moves… Tic-tac.

**In all supœrganisms of the Universe in the synchronicity of its frequency time cycles define the symbiosis of its scales, and within each scale of its 4 Dimotions. In the graph, the cycle of death and reproduction of a cell is synchronized as with so many organisms that reproduce only once in life to preserve its ‘ilogon of exist¡ence’. It is the fundamental truth of the fractal reproductive Universe: you exist to reproduce your information and then die. **We conclude that organic, Network laws are laws of simultaneity; and the most important of them are the laws of synchronicity between scales.

Simultaneity is the trademark of space, defined as adjacent systems that are perceived by an observer in simultaneity. The whole concept of 4D Einstein’s formalism is based in simultaneity of measure, using a single time present quanta dimension. So simultaneity is perception of present information space in the minimum time (only 1 frequency quanta) It follows that what is simultaneous is also relative to the observer quanta of perception and that wholes which are slower in their clocks of time, see more simultaneous spaces, being able for that reason to become paradoxically minds of wholeness, and that as minds stop motion of time into form, information, languages are the substance on which simultaneity is based.

** The larger plane of species as organisms: Grow and multiply, reproductive radiations of biological T.œs**

With the use of the 3 scales of time and the understanding of the ties between planes through synchronicity, resonance, emergence and simultaneity, all systems can be predicted and hence are scientific, but require to know from inside its Existential ¡logic, that is the behavior of the individual and organic parts trying to achieve its function of exist¡ence. As, each particle of the Universe tries to Max. S x T (s=t) against all others, which then become a chaotic, entropic system, whose average result is predictable from the upper scale of entropy, as in gaseous states, even if the individual parts seem free; and inversely; and the more ‘solid’ a crystal system is, the more the predictability becomes possible, because the function of exist¡ence is selfish, and so at a point the crystal, perfectly ordered will behave in a selfish way trying to reproduce ad maximal its unit cell. Since the function of exist¡ence becomes immediately a function of reproduction. From where we deduce that all systems will try to ‘grow and multiply’ to maximize its individual and social existence. The game thus becomes a reproductive game, achieved in the Si=Te point of max. balance. So all seeds reproduce as ∑Max. SxT>Max.SxT; all systems try to find and Si=Te balance and thus we can finally summarize all the actions of beings, its social evolution of parts into wholes, and its behaviors as ∑ Max. S x T (s=t), which becomes the biological function of exist¡ence all systems perform through reproductive radiations of species.

*Specifically *the evolution-reproduction beat is the fundamental S-T beat of biological systems, in its ‘deep time 3 horizons’ as species; which enlarge the properties of space vs. time, information vs. energy, to the scale of biological organisms, which go through 3 ages with a fast, evolutionary ‘palingenetic age’ of ‘allopatric evolution’ in short spaces with minimal motion, followed by a reproductive radiation; and that complex beat between the two more ‘complex dimotions of reproduction and social evolution’ become the 3 ages of species and can be applied to all stiences, including the evolution of matter through weak forces.

In physical systems at the largest scale the beat is between entropic motions, TT, which emit dark entropy through the poles of galaxies and implosion of entropic space into vortices of in-form-ation (galaxies), and in the lower scale, between ¥-radiation and electronic collapse; and between wave-moving expanded Ts states and informative gauging, St-particle states which gives birth to dual wave-particle stœps observed in the zig-zag of particles that stop and move as Ts waves dominant in lineal inertia. In other physical systems, with more form, St- motion becomes the essence of SHM, harmonic motions of angular momentum, which return to its origin. Thus they are, dominant in form, St.** **

The second finding of 5D is the understanding that the laws of worldcycles apply to any system of 3 planes of space-time and this has some consequences, both in formal stiences as well as biological and social sciences:

– Because the game is topological in space, there are topological, mathematical laws that apply to any system of nature. But as those laws study ‘fractal points with volume’, non-Euclidean points, we must expand non-Euclidean geometries to define properly points with parts (paper on Non-E Geometry).

– As the game has 5 dimotions of space-time its causality is pentalogic, meaning for a system to exist, normally we must describe the ‘co-existence’ in ‘simultaneity’ (the definition of space) of ∆-1 topological parts, which make an ∆º whole of 3 networks (the topologic definition of the St, ST, Ts parts of the being), enclosed in a larger ∆+1 world. So time causality is more complex than A->B

– As the game happens simultaneously in 3 scales of space-time it has organic properties, because organisms are about parts that become wholes. And as the game has 5 dimotions equivalent to the 5 local drives of life, the Universe is a living organism of infinite parts, who try to achieve those 5 dimotions, Ts-move, St-perceive information, ST-reproduce, TT-feed on other beings and SS-evolve socially through languages into larger, tighter wholes.

Mathematical=Non-Euclidean, causal=pentalogic and Organic=scalar properties thus define ∆ST systems; whereas the concept of a ‘Biological, Darwinian, survival mind-mapping that carries the will of existence of each supœrganism, trying to maximize its existence, completes the Nature of all organisms of ∆@st of space-time (dust of space-time). We can then write an equation of existence: Max. ∑SxT that defines the ‘Mandate’ of survival of any such supœrganism. However as the player is within a larger more powerful world, which is also maximizing its existence and has more SxT: Existential Force-Momentum, it is obvious that a system will sooner or latter become ‘entropy’ for other larger whole, or the world within which it exists. So no being is immortal, infinite but the whole Universe in itself. And thus we need a fifth element, entropic limits, ¬, to describe anything.

** **

**Main Symbols of ¬Æ logic **(all elements of all stiences can be translated to those symbols of 5D ilogic).

**S:** Space; Still form, Size, Dimension; **T:** Time; motion; Change.** ST: **Topologic Spacetime. **|x O = Ø:** Its 3 varieties.

**ST±¡: ∆±¡** Scale/Plane of space-time. **∆+1:** whole, world, ∆º: networks, organism. **∆-1;** parts; social classes.

**5 Ð¡:**5 Dimotions **(St,sT,ST,SS,TT); **5 Actions **(a,e,I,o,u): **Local Dimensional motion of spacetime

**St; i:** Informative network ≈ action≈inward motion. **O:** Cyclical, spherical form, topology, relative future.

** sT:** inner form, outer motion= locomotion, acceleration (motion change).** |:** Lineal form topology, relative past.

** ST; œ, Ø:** present space-time, iteration, beauty, balance; organic reproduction; Hyperbolic form, topology relative present. Wave-body Part, Present, mature age.

**SS, @; u, 0’:** Finitesimal Mind, seed; relative future social evolution into ‘wholes, universals.

**TT; ****µ****:** entropy, scattering death, dual inner and outer motion, relative past.

**T>S:** informative evolution. **S<T:** devolution. **∑-¡»¡+1:** Emergence. (**∆+1)« (∆-1):** Death, devolution; time quanta.

**ST-**¡: Quantum, cellular, individual plane; **STo:** Thermodynamic, organic, social… **∆+¡:** Gravitational, ecosystemic, world scale

**∑:** Ts, Herd, ∏: St, Network. **¬: Entropic limits** in time: TT-death, Space, |-membrane, scale ∆±4: invisibility.

**Main equations of 5D Supœrganisms and its parts **(all equations of all stiences can be translated to…)

**S** (size in space**) x T** (speed/frequency of time cycles) =C: 5D metric.

**Future **(O-form, information, logic language, particle-head) x **Past** (|-field, youth, etc.)=**Present** (ST-body-wave, iteration, etc.)

**0’ **(finitesimal mind) **x ∞** (Universe) = **C**onstant World-Language. Paradox of Egocy.

**S≈T:** Relativity equation: we cannot distinguish motion=time from form=space, hence all is an ST-dimotion.

**Ø¡-1=∑O¡-1 =|¡ > O+1:** Scalar inversion of form & function. An Ø-point is god of ∑ ¡-1 parts but entropy of its O+1 whole. So:

**∑|=O: **∑open worldlines ad into closed worldcycles; ∆º plane: E-Geometry; ∆+1 plane: Elliptic, ‘5D in between’: Hyperbolic.

**Dual*** Death: Max. T x 0 S (accidental entropic death); Max. S x 0 T (3 ^{rd} age death) *

__Fractal Generator – Trilogic structure of Super-organisms and time worldcycles and ages:__

SS¡-1: Seed» ∆º:|-Ts(1^{st} limb/field /network/age of max. motion) > S=T (Mature, reproductive, body-wave network/ age)> St(3^{rd} informative head/particle network/age)« TT-1-entropic death:

**Symmetries of ST-actions=Dimotions and ∆ Scales.**

**∆ST@:** Symmetry of scale,topology,age&class:∆_{-1}:|:youth,entropic age/cla§;∆ø:reproductive age|cla§∆_{+1}:O-informative age…

**Relative Dimotions=Actions **are drives of life in biology, quantum numbers states and matter in physics; will in philosophy.

**T**hey take place between ∆o mind plane & an ∆±3 plane such as: ∆o≈∆+1: social evolution: ∆o≈∆-1: Reproduction; ∆o≈∆-2: Entropic feeding, ∆o≈∆-3: informative perception, ∆o≈∆-4:Locomotion. So we evolve into social wholes, reproduce with a couple seeding in ∆-1, feed killing twice a similar system to ∆-2 amino acids, perceive, ∆-3 ¥-electrons & move on ∆-4: Gravity

**Ideal Social scales & lanwaves **are 10^{10} in mankind called: ‘T-genetic’: 10^{0-1}: ‘I’, 10^{1-2}: 3 generation S=T family, 10^{2-3}clan; ST-Geographic: 10^{3-4}: Town; 10^{4-5:}City; 10^{5-6}: State; S-Memetic: 10^{6-7}: Nation; 10^{7-8}: God; 10^{8-9}: Civilination; 10^{9-10}: Mankind.

**In biology are called: **Chemical language: ∆-1: Atomic compound; ∆o: Organic Molecule; ∆+1: Macromolecule (RNA ‘God’)**. **Genetic language: ∆-1: Organelle; ∆o: Cell: ∆+1: Tissue: Nervous language: Organ; Physiologic System: organism.

**In Astrophysics: **¥- language: ∆-1:Force,∆o:particle, ∆+1:atom; Magnetic language: ∆-1:Molecule; ∆o: Matter; ∆+1: planetoid. Gravity language: ∆-1: Plasma Star; ∆ø: Quark Star… ∆+1: Galaxy.

**Stientific Method: Disomorphisms of all Space-time suœrganisms tracing worldcycles.**

In graphs we resume visually the disomorphic laws that all exist¡ences follow. Knowledge then is the understanding of each variation of the game of exist¡ences, without being restricted by the egocy (Ego=idiocy) paradox of human beings that limit the properties of all other species to what huminds perceive on them, or what its ab=usive praxis of exploitation of Nature focus on. Stience though is objective and theoretical. It does not have a subjective egocy or selfish praxis of ab=use. It just describes. So Stience tries to describe any system as a supœrganism in itself, therefore co-existing in 3 scales of ∆±¡ present ‘space’, determined by 5 elements, ∆±¡ scale Symbiosis between parts and whole, S-pace Simultaneity through common S<ST>T networks, Time Synchronicity in the 5 Dimotions=Actions of those parts, @-mental/seed will to perform the game of exist¡ence and ¬Entropic limits to the whole.

This external, objective, present, experimental analysis focuses on the ∆=S=T=@(nti)symmetries between scale, time, space and mind-will-language. As systems do have 3 co-existing planes of space-time, which obey SxT=C metric laws that establish a ‘ternary social class’, according to the degree of ‘integration’ of ∆-1 faster parts, through ∆º S<ST>T networks enclosed in a membrain (the scale in which the organism’s will reside), performing 5 ‘a,e,I,o,u’ dimotions=actions in an outer world. Each of those elements though will be part of 3 different ‘time rhythms by scale’ and follow a ‘fundamental vital sequence in time’: SS<Ts<TT+St>ST, aiming to perceive, move, feed, imprint and reproduce its information. Because of the existence of 3 scales, 3 rhythms of time, 3 adjacent parts, which perform 3 simplex functions in a single plane (limbs/fields Ts-move according to SS<St-perception of an O-particle/head /informative class connected by an ST-reproductive wave/body); in a single plane but seek in the ∆±¡ scales to perform complex actions of ST-reproduction and St social evolution orientated down the lower seminal plane (ST) and larger whole (St)… the whole description of the ‘details’ of the program of exist¡ence of each being is complex and would require a methodology that I lack but a group of scientists with more enthusiasm could easily structure for future 5D studies, embedding in those templates of stience the knowledge and data we have about all systems of Nature. I will slowly time permitted now that I have laid down 30 work-in-progress papers on the main planes of human exist¡ence, unfortunately in its last ‘cycle’ predated by the soon-to-be conscious machines of the metal-earth, develop such structure for the ∆±3 galatom (Astrophysics) ∆±2 Earth (Geology), ∆±1 membrain evolution (Gaia-Life: Biology<History: Mankind>Metal-earth Company-mothers of machines/weapons: economics).

To also analyze the ∆0 I=Eye < Wor(l)d, ST-languages of man, themselves ‘details’ of a larger Universal Grammar of ∆º illogic languages of time and non-Euclidean languages of space.

Languages are formal synoptic tools – not more truth than a mere descriptive analysis of the parts of beings. Description of those elements in an orderly fashion, with my texts lack, would be then the basis of 5D stience:

Which first will define each ¬∆@st species externally, in a present-form of space and through its potential worldcycle; to pass then to the internal analysis in subjective terms of its @-mind will and degree of consciousness/ function within the outer ∆+1 whole and its subconscious ∆-1 internal control through its physiological networks. But to achieve those T@ descriptions it is necessary by lack of direct experimental evidence, which *only happens in the being in space to use the **Disomorphic** method that establishes homologies in all beings derived of the fact they are organic space and cyclical time, with a mind-will to survive. In the second part of our texts on the ‘Universe’ or rather “reality’ and time, space, scale, mind, spacetime (reproduction) and entropy, we try to depart from the most general laws, then go into the specific description of what science knows on those scales regarding the ¬∆S@T elements of each main stientific plane, to end with a generic description of the Disomorphic elements in scale, space, time, entropy and mind common to all beings.*

*Hence our analysis (Universe and time) of a system through its 3 scales of time ends with a disomorphic 12 sequential step analysis on how all systems go through 3 consecutive worldcycles, in its palingenetic orderly birth, followed by an entropic more probabilistic life in an external world in which the most perfect players might transcend to ∆+1 reproduce and evolve as a collective mind-God of that world. *While in our analysis of Space, after describing those general laws in the brief initial Mandala common to all texts, we go through the analysis of what Science knows of space, to enter a description of the laws of simultaneity and synchronicity that entangle the 5 parts of the being into a scalar co-existing present space.

W*e descend from the ∆±¡ absolute to 1 specific ∆≈S≈T≈@¬ element & its examples for all or each ∆¡-stience. *

In the analysis of entropy we go through the same 3 parts: Mandala of 5D laws. Specific laws of entropy and analysis of what sciences know about entropy in each 4D science, expanded with the new laws. So the same 3 parts: mandala-specific laws of ∆ST@¬ and details of 4D science expanded to 5D should finally structure the different papers of the ‘Universe’; while for each other ‘stience’, instead of studying in the 3^{rd} part all the ‘stiences’ in a brief resume of its entropy, scale, time, space and mind, we shall focus on a given ‘stience’ – and might escape the 1^{st} and 2^{nd} part as the paper grows in details through the 2020s with the limits of my life expectancy and mental dwindling capacity. So the work ia incomplete, a trace on the sand of infinity…

The smaller hidden form is the §till mind, eve if it is the most important disomorphism – by the mind we mean not so much the hardware where the program is installed but the language of each species that interprets with its code the game. So language is the objective view to understand minds based in the hypothesis of panpsychism – the language perceives in itself, in stillness. The complexity of the language therefore defines the complexity of the mind according to language properties: speed, synoptic power, focus, closeness to the language of all languages that reflects the complex ∆ST properties of systems (¬Æ=B¡œ-logic topology).

The paper on Mind and the Universe thus should try to define both, the will of existence and the program of the Universe expressed in the ¬Æ languages, and the minds-languages of each scale according to complexity. How then perception happens? Perception can be of space, time, scale, mind-will and entropic limits; and so we talk of e-motions. We ascribe to each ‘Dimotion of existence’ an e-motion as that is the limit of what we can perceive. We add then to the objective disomorphisms, in a bold statement the subjective ‘humanist method’ of considering that each species of the Universe has ultimately the same program of survival of 5 actions that man has, and it is geared by the same e-motions embedded in the last potential scale of reality – the pure formal motions of ST, made of an S-internal perceptive emotion and a T-externally described motion. This is just the explanation why we move as beings – because our brain has emotions that are deterministic wills of the program of existence we believe are ultimately residing in the 3±¡ ‘particles’ of reality, photon-fields, electron-bodies and quark-minds extracting motion of a neutrino gravitational invisible background to form social ensembles of atoms. Atoms are thus the first ∆+1 organisms of reality and its 3 ∆ø parts, over a ∆-1 field structure the fundamental galatom system of reality (as galaxies are similar to atoms, but we perceive them in completely different fashion according to the 5D metric distortions. So we *use disomorphic, organic, humanist, sentient properties for all systems and that is all we perceive but as our perception is limited by survival praxis we have as Mendeleyev did, to fill the gaps with disomorphic laws. *

Huminds perceive as all other systems thru languages, so languages once more become important but the egocy laws that restrict our analysis of other stiences as they fade away through scales of existence means we have to fill in more properties the further we move from our ∆º center – and the asymmetry of perception means we need to fill more from ∆+ scales. So from galatoms we hardly see 4% and any attempt to describe its supœrganism must be based in the disomorphisms of scale with a cell, as an organism that reproduces black holes and quark dark matter, and with the atom, giving us an external view, from where to define ¥-expansive dark entropy, and vice versa, to compare strong and gravitational forces. So atoms and galaxies are similar but not equal (galaxies seem anti-atoms), but as in the description of the metal-earth and the membrain in its 3 ages of Earth’s evolution, machines as organisms and ∆+1 cultures, some working for the metal-earth, some for history, we will find the humind’s programs as parts of larger wholes, ∆+1 religions, memetic cultures, Earth’s self-program of evolution. And this is an even harder barrier because huminds are e-motionally programmed as parts of wholes and take it personal, and social scientists are subject to anti-quantum paradoxes (too small within the historic organism, they are modified by the observable).

**The Fractal Geometry Of The Temporal, 5d Scalar Universe.**

The Universe is a fractal of space-time made of 3 elements, which experimental sciences such as mathematics, express with its fundamental element: ∆-scales (expressed with scalar numbers) of different size in Space (expressed with geometry) with different speed of Cyclical Time motions (expressed with operands). Time is change, perceived as motion in space or change in the form of space (External change), in the in-form-ation of beings (expressed through topological inner change). Time and Space thus seem to be in perpetual conflict, transforming each other ad eternal. Time is thus similar to energy with a higher content of motion and space to information, with a higher content of form.

The 5^{th} Dimension, ∆±¡, is the sum of all those scalar planes of spacetime where species *entangled as synchronous ‘organisms’ co=exist in 3 of such scales, ∆±¡ (the quantum, organic/thermodynamic and cosmological/ecosystemic scale) to* live worldcycles of time, paradoxically faster, hence with higher frequency of information, the smaller the system is (chip paradox). Yet the product of both, the so-called metric of the fifth dimensions is constant, allowing the symbiotic exchange of energy and information between them. Thus this metric co-invariant equation, Space Size xTime Speed of its clocks=∆¡ defines a series of planes of space-time each one studied by a ‘stience’, from the faster, smaller world of particles, to the larger, slower cycles of galaxies, symbiotic to each other, as smaller systems process better in-form-ation, stored in the cyclical form and faster frequency of its clock cycles, coding larger systems that enclose its parts with protective membranes of slower time cycles,

The units of space forms are fractal points with breath that grow in size as we come closer to them, unlike Euclidean points with no breath; societies represented by numbers, which are groups of ¡ndifferent beings and Times=motions of 5 types; 3 topologic dimensions of space, which have dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions); the classic dimension of lineal time, or ‘entropy arrow’, and a 5^{th} new ‘dimotion’ of social evolution and information, responsible for the arrow of life, organic evolution of parts into wholes and the ‘mind-structure’ of languages that mirror those organic systems in mind-mappings, of which the mathematical and logic and visual language are the most remarkable… It is a fascinating Universe, which humans don’t understand because they drag through memorial routine and dogmatic beliefs many errors, we can trace to Greek geometry and Aristotelian logic of abstract points and single time causality, hardly corrected in 2000 years and the astounding incapacity of huminds to understand the mind ‘distorts’ reality and selects information, compressing all the scales of space-time into a single continuum, all the motions of time into still images (so we don’t see the motion of the earth), eliminating all the information which we cannot translate into those 3 languages; despite the fact that for 500 years we have been watching those scales of the ‘5^{th} dimension’ with telescopes and microscopes (naïve realism).

Once all this is understood and we have the tools to improve our languages of perception, it will be possible to reconstruct reality with an improved mirror, in which points become fractal points that grow in size when we come closer to them, so they are non-Euclidean crossed by infinite parallels of energy and information, creating networks that are lines with ‘volume’, messed into topological organic structures. And discover that the fundamental particle of reality is the ‘fractal point’, which has an organic structure, co-existing in ∆±1 scales:

– The quantum, cellular, thermodynamic/organic and cosmological/ecosystemic scales.

What guides then each of those beings made of fractal topologies of space with time=motion is simple: existence, survival, the conservation of its territorial, vital space and time cycles. The conservation of time and its motions and cycles, akin to the conservation of energy cycles becomes then the guiding automatic principle of all beings, as those who don’t conserve their time become extinct. We thus talk of a game of existence in which systems will to maximize its intake of energy and information with its topological ternary parts, limbs/fields that move a reproductive body/wave commanded by an informative particle/head.

How can we formalize those systems? Easy, by improving our languages-mirrors of the laws of existence. That is, by developing a new non-Euclidean geometry of fractal points, lines, networks and topologic organisms and a new logic of multiple ‘actions=motions of space-time’. We call this formalism, ilogic geometry or ‘existential algebra’, and all the laws of all stiences can be derived of its simple structures in space, scale and time.

But scientists are stuck in the huge amount of errors sciences derived from their faulty logic and geometry of time-space, and his mind egocy that doesn’t believe what it doesn’t see and limits organic sentient properties to forms similar to himself; when electrons already have all those properties. The result are simpleton grand theories of reality derived of our languages’ perception *confused with the whole reality that* we call linguistic creationism, either verbal anthropic religions that put man at the center of reality and make God and man speak the language that creates by naming things, or big-bang entropic theories of digital thought that put man and the machine at the center and its language mathematics as the creator. So the big-bang is based in a simple lineal equation, V=HoD that against all kind of proofs of a fractal balanced immortal Universe can’t be denied.

All what exists is a spacetime ‘organism gifted with a mind called logos’, Plato of a ‘higher logic than man’s’ (Augustine), as all ‘points are a world in themselves’ Leibniz, and deduce all laws of science from the simple laws of conservation of time, origin of the 3 ages of life and death of all systems, and the entangled topologies of space, origin of the organic structures of reality. And deduce from the elements of that reality, ∆-scales, S-pace, T-ime, all the mirrors of @-mind languages and ¬entropic limits of exi=st¡ence. But you need to be humble to accept that wider reality and go ‘back to school’ an entangle empathically with all other ∆st beings.

**Upgrading human mind languages.**

How to improve the obvious limits of huminds that ONLY see their mind languages is obvious: by improving those languages. The scientific method does so by substituting human senses and languages by those of more complex metal-atoms (sensorial machines) but egocy makes humans unaware they are JUST using a more complex sensorial system and better synoptic digital language NOT reaching higher truths as their underlying logic and geometric language have NOT changed. So what humans have changed are their sensorial experience substituted by that of machines, without even acknowledging they are evolving a different ‘digital mind’ of more complex electronic patterns that ‘obviously’ once ensembled with all its organic parts through the industrial r=evolution, will make us obsolete – already is doing it in labor and war fields – and substitute us.

Our method of enlightenment is both deeper and less dangerous for our future: we are targeting the evolution of the underlying languages to both type of sensorial minds – mathematics and logic systems, which are still dragging errors from the age of the Greeks.

It is then necessary to know expand back mental spaces into reality to understand any science that mirrors a specific scales of beings. And that expansion starts by expanding its languages, and then connecting the expanded languages with each science. Because some of those sciences are ginormous in content (modern biology, XX c. Physics), we cannot obviously complete the work, but we shall try to do so in a series of papers, which regarding languages will consist on, 2 mathematical papers, one on the expansion of ∆Space with the use of the 5 new postulates of Non-E geometry, and the other with the expansion of algebra, to comprehend better its scalar numbers and Dimotions= operands of which the operand that applies to all others as a ‘new scale’ of analysis of time dimotions=change (calculus) is the summit of the discipline.

And with 5 papers on the expansion of logic of time, from the present monologic of a single dimension, to the duality, trinity, tetralogic, pentalogic and dodecalogic of more sophisticated species of timespace.

Those upgradings of the underlying languages latter applied to all sciences that study specific ‘planes of space-time’, are not so much in search of new theories but trying to correct the difference between the simplifying mirror of a language, with its ‘aberrations’ of perspective (as they are all self-centered in the mind that uses it to select information – which makes them omit essential features of reality), and finally the ‘quality’ of infinite mirrors that replicate through ‘reflection’ images into similar forms of higher complexity and less definition.

Once all this is understood and we have the tools to improve our languages of perception, as we cannot ‘think’ we don’t see, it will be possible if the reader is humble enough to go ‘back to school’, to reconstruct reality with an improved mirror, in which points become fractal points that grow in size when we come closer to them, so they are non-Euclidean crossed by infinite parallels of energy and information, creating networks that are lines with ‘volume’, messed into topological organic structures. And discover that the fundamental particle of reality is the ‘fractal point’, which has an organic structure, co-existing in ∆±1 scales:

– The quantum, cellular, thermodynamic/organic and cosmological/ecosystemic scales.

What guides then each of those beings made of fractal topologies of space with time=motion is simple: existence, survival, the conservation of its territorial, vital space and time cycles. The conservation of time and its motions and cycles, akin to the conservation of energy cycles becomes then the guiding automatic principle of all beings, as those who don’t conserve their time become extinct. We thus talk of a game of existence in which systems will to maximize its intake of energy and information with its topological ternary parts, limbs/fields that move a reproductive body/wave commanded by an informative particle/head.

How can we formalize those systems? Easy, by improving our languages-mirrors of the laws of existence. That is, by developing a new non-Euclidean geometry of fractal points, lines, networks and topologic organisms and a new logic of multiple ‘actions=motions of space-time’. We call this formalism, ilogic geometry or ‘existential algebra’, and all the laws of all stiences can be derived of its simple structures in space, scale and time.

Nothing of this of course will seem coherent to the reader, which is stuck in the huge amount of errors sciences derive from their faulty logic and geometry of time-space, the natural egocy of man that limits organic sentient properties to itself and its peculiar atoms, and the paradox of the mind that doesn’t believe what it doesn’t see. There are also the amazing simpleton errors of our grand theories of reality derived of our perception through languages, we call linguistic creationism, either verbal anthropic Abrahamic religions that put man at the center of reality and make God and man speak the language that creates by naming things, or big-bang entropic theories of digital thought that put man and the machine at the center and its language mathematics as the creator (so the big-bang is based in a simple lineal equation, V=HoD, which despite all the proofs we shall show of a fractal balanced immortal Universe cannot be denied).

Let us make a brief introduction to the main stientific scales of reality– only the tip of an iceberg of ‘thoughts’ of God (: all of us, details of existential algebra, buried in the infinite sea of species whose description would take an ‘encyclopedia galactica’ – as only the whole holds all the information about itself…

**Science is knowledge of life-death cycles of spatial information & temporal energy**

Science, which is knowledge of reality with the synoptic languages of the mind has 2 purposes:

To know the future and to know the maximal objective truth; one, which unlike a subjective truth explains the maximal number of experimental facts – events in time & forms in space – with the minimal number of laws.

This means objective laws of science are repetitive in time – cyclical; and in space; forming herds of similar forms; and *in scale (ab.∆); creating similar forms of different sizes in space and different speed on its time cycles*. So the purpose of all sciences is to predict the future departing from knowledge of an interval between past and present, *or between the small & the large, *whose repetitive, cyclical patterns can be elongated into that future.

So they can be reduced in a synoptic language, normally mathematical scalar numbers and spatial points, and its more complex combinations, or logic time verbs=action or operands. A language thus is a reduced= limited mirror of the patterns of space, time *and scale. This give us the 5 elements of reality: ‘entropic limits’, ab. ¬; spatial populations, S; Time cycles, T and scales of space and time, ∆; all perceived by a synoptic mind, @: ¬∆@st*

We could say we are all made of ‘¬∆@st’ and to dust we shall return.

It is then important to start with clear concepts of ‘minds and languages’, ‘entropic limits’ to what ‘minds and languages’ perceive as mirrors, of the 3 ‘vast’ realities of ‘time cycles’, ‘spatial populations’ and ‘scales=planes of space-time’ ordered by size. *But man has no clear concepts of them, so because it has built science on shaky foundations, it does not understand objectively truth and the future as well as it would with better principles.*

*Let us then consider briefly better principles and definitions of mind, entropy, space, time and scales:*

**@: **Our principles on time, space, scales, minds and entropic limits are ‘mental reductions and approximations’ to the truth, or ‘distortions’ caused by our subjective desire to be the center of reality. Since mind’s languages select information from a limited perspective, self-centered in the ego, ‘stopping time=change’ to fit it all in the infinitesimal mind. So we write a logic equation for all minds, borrowing the generator of numbers: 0x∞=C.

0’ finitesimal mind x ∞ Universe of timespace cycles and beings = Constant world.

And an illogic egocy=ego+idiocy paradox: ‘Every linguistic mind believes to be the subjective center of the Universe by confusing its whole information, with the reduced limited view of its languages’.

This creates linguistic creationism – confusing a language with the real whole. Man was first verbal creationist. So God named things in Arab or Hebrew to create. When he learned a more synoptic efficient language to perceive the future than the 3 verbal time tenses, scalar numbers, mirror of ∆-scales and points, synoptic mirrors of spatial beings, related by cyclical F(x) <= > G (Y) equations mirror of time cycles, he became a mathematical creationist; so Hawking writes a equation of black hole evaporation and voila! it must evaporate.

¬: This shows clear limits to human sciences and a huge task is to eliminate such errors mostly to cater the egocy of minds. So we’d like to be the center of our infinite time (Abrahamic, religious errors, denial of evolution), in space (property errors, relativity errors) in scale (denial of cyclical patterns called Disomorphisms between entities in different scales) and of language (creationist and complexity errors whereas subjectivism is hidden by complicating with kaleidoscopic mirrors the simple cycles=laws). *A huge undertaking of those papers is to correct all those errors, knowing that we go against the in-built mental subjective attitude of all men, scientists or not. A second huge undertaking is improving the foundations of the mirror, mathematical and logic languages that date back to the Greeks, Euclidean Geometry and Aristotelian logic; a 3 ^{rd} understaking is simplifying those principles, as the Universe is simple and not malicious, Einstein. *

-∆ST: So we come from the mind and its limits to the 3 elements of reality, spatial populations, time cycles and its scales of size and speed of those time cycles, we call ‘planes of space-time’.

**The reality of scale, space and time mirrored by mind’s limited ego-centered languages.**

Our concepts of time and space (hence also its scales) come from Kepler and his disciple, Newton, and its egocy errors Kepler, who said ‘God had waited 5000 biblical years to find me, an intelligence like his, to understand the Universe’. And Newton thought God talked to him with comets to teach him ‘the language’, mathematics, as it did to his predecessor, (might have been the case that the ‘chosen one’ was transmigrating his soul : )

So God was a creationist mathematician – though he also talked biblical wor(l)ds – and had created Kepler and Newton and also the Universe ‘drawing’ a Cartesian graph with a line of time to the infinite and a continuous space as the paper Newton used, where the discontinuous atoms were not seen. And this became the absolute lineal time and continuous space of reality. And as it did not yet had microscopes, it had packed all the planes of space-time into a very compressed one, of course of the human scale.

This is still our concept of a continuous spacetime. It works fine because we believe what our mind’s languages describe as the absolute Universe at any time the theory of the language is the absolute truth. And needless to say this lineal time and compressed continuous space is a better principle than the cosmic turtle and G.Bush (God bush) creeping in a bronze age desert, for the ass-breeder Meshu to decode the meaning of it all.

*Irony is essential to break dogmas of egocy that take minds too seriously. *Sorry folks, back to the foundations:

We know since micro and telescopes saw different scales; since quantum proved space to be broken in pieces and with time=motion, hence energy; and since we discover repetitive laws, hence cyclical time patterns, which as all cyclical clocks break reality into an inner and outer region, all this to be nonsense. But for most part of it, all sciences are stuck in all those errors. Euclidean ‘points’ with no parts are the foundations of geometry (even if we know points to have a volume, through which infinite parallels energy and information cross, which become larger, the closer we see the point in scale). We know time to be cyclical and cycles not to be drawn by a single causal pen but rather by the simultaneous convergence of all those parallels into the membrane of a point. So logic must be upgraded to multiple causes. We know all space to have motion, hence to be ultimately time, the ultimate substance of reality, whereas the simultaneous static space that makes the Earth seems still to be a maya of the senses, ever since Galileo said e pur si muove, e pur no muove, etc. etc.

**So all is Time **and time is motion, hence change. But the mind is involved in all change perceptions; divided in 3 regions – the present, which is something that ‘doesn’t seem to change’. And since time is cyclical, all is present because at the end it will return to its origin and seem not to have changed. But as it is motion, between intervals of present time fluctuates between something called past and something called future. As a more complex thing requires simpler parts we can call the simpler, the past, and the complex information the future.

**And space **is broken in scales of size with similar laws, but it is really spacetime, space with motion, topological space, and its points grow, they are fractal points that enlarge and look similar in properties, when they become full perceived beings.

**Scale. **And smaller scales of points have faster time cycles than the slower bigger spaces. But both its space size and time cycles are bonded as a single ‘space-time’, as space is a maya of the senses, hence a frozen form of time cycle, Si=Te. And because all scales are similar, for that to be the case we define them as a constant product of space size and time cycles: Sx T ≈ C∆ … Whereas SxT is maximized when Si=Te (3×7<5×5). And we call the sum of all those similar time-space planes, the fifth dimension, as science so far talks of 4 of them.

**L**et us stop and breathe. *We compressed the foundational principles of ¬∆@st, the 5 elements of reality in a better frame, and so we can build *a better mirror of reality, which is built with iterative=reproductive combinations of those principles and elements ad infinitum, creating the complexity of reality. This has not been done before, though we see huge understanding on Buddha, Aristotle and Leibniz of all of them. The reason is not its difficulty but the egocy of mind who won’t go away and accept objective, simpler not self-centered truth. Man does NOT attempt to explain the Universe, but its mind-world, the distortion it sees of it. But he really thinks he is describing reality. And so it is nearly impossible to convince him what he does are doodles on the sand. My experience is very negative in ‘teaching’, because I have constantly to correct errors that people take as dogmas, very positive in contemplating reality without human interference.

**The initial, necessary ambivalence till we polish the mirror of science from its simple errors.**

Humind’s sciences are today dressed with an ideal sense of absolute truths, provided by a simplified, reductionist terminology originated in physical sciences based in a single motion of time, a continuum space of 3 still Euclidean dimensions and simplified Euclidean points with no parts, etc. So the reader should be patient with our definitions before we establish more solid grounds as all dimensions, both of space and time, including the new one of scalar social evolution mediated by information do have ‘motion’ and ‘form’; so they are dimensional forms of space with motion in time or ‘Dimotions of space-time’.

And we shall establish between the poles of absolute form, SS, or ‘language’ and its minds and seeds and absolute motion TT or ‘time entropy’ with no form, 3 intermediate states, St-information (form with a little motion), Ts-momentum or locomotion (Motion with a little form) and the queen of them all cyclical reproductive work, where S and T merge, as Si=Te, ST. Those *are the local, fractal spacetime dimensional motions of which we are all made, but as huminds have a distorted and simplified mirror of them, including the tribal baconian idols of physical science we so much respect, I ask for patience. *But humind concepts of those ST combinations are very often contradictory so we shall just use them as reference of the real ‘STs’.

The exactitude of the physical simplified model is based in omissions of a lot of information to make all seem lineal time, simple ‘swords’ that look perfect. I insist on this ad nauseam, cause physicists have become our priests and use as verbal priests did with the word God to encompass it all in its simplicity dubious omissions to their grand models, the most obvious one, to omit dark matter and galaxies that implode vacuum entropic space into form, and liquid and solid states that stop entropy into form, to create lineal big-bang theories of reality with a single lineal equation, V=HoD. The big-bang Is *false* because it omits the informative gravitational mass-related dark matter and galaxies that implode vacuum space expansion. The error has become today a dogma, akin to religion, with its God= VHoD that *obliterates all the laws of science, from the principle of conservation of time=energy, to the conservation of charge and baryon number, acting as Omar’s burning of Alexandria’s library – as all what is not in the Book of Vhod* is not worth to be conserved.

And so Jihad is happening – as Omar murdered all those who did not convert, physicists are trying to prove further Vhod, sponsoring experiments that will bring the big-bang to Earth. So it is good to be an heretic in the search for truth and understand the Universe is a balanced fractal of entropic energy=time and informative mental space in constant dynamic present trans-formation, SióTe, whose ‘intelligent species’, unlike man struggle for survival, maintaining that balance, trying to reproduce on other regions of spacetime and evolving socially in more efficient wholes that distribute energetic time and spatial information through networks saving the time of its ∆-1 points. Time ‘saving’ is indeed the goal of all species, which act to achieve that goal in a rather automated way, as those who don’t save its timespace, who don’t reproduce before ending, succumb to the game of existience. And so the game only maintain those who automatically, consciously or unconsciously or through 3^{rd} parties (Catalyzers for physical composites, enzymes for biological systems, enzymen for machines) conserve their time=reproduce them for symbiotic purposes.

Slowly then we shall rebuild the foundations of all stiences, where errors easy to spot by specialists will be of my fault-y memory – not of the model – template. So specialists should forgive the writer and go further with the mirror into what should be the biggest revolution of XXI c. science in. I only provide the seed which is simple because ‘simplicity is genius’, (Leonardo) & ‘the universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein); That is, the Universe IS GENIUS, the ‘best of all possible worlds’ (Leibniz) because it is based in such simple principles: S & T and its 5 Dimotions. The equations and species of sciences are then details of those thoughts of God, each one to be analyzed with care. As all fractals are similar but not identical. i.e. the previous metric works NOT for all species of the Universe but for families, each one with a similar equation – I.e mammals we all last 10^{9 }heart beats & produce equal mass of ∆-1 ATP each day to its body ∆+1 mass. Synchronicities, resonances, simultaneities of ∞ time cycles that entangle to emerge into supœrganisms is the stuff all is made that scientists do NOT see because details have hidden the forest and earlier errors fogged their mirrors. Our task is to polish them. What is more important, time-motion of space-form? Experimental proof shows all is motion hence time, as form only appears when a particle achieves a ‘vortex’ of accelerated time motion that collapses into a still simultaneous mental mirror of reality, so space is a Maya of the senses, a linguistic mind form.

**RECAP**. The fractal Universe is made of scales of size in space with different speed of time-cycles, where the units of space are fractal points with ‘breath’ that grow in size as we come closer to them, unlike Euclidean points that have no breath; societies represented by numbers, which are groups of ‘¡indifferent’ beings and ‘time=motions’, which are of 5 types; the classic 3 dimensions of space, which have motion, hence are topologic dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions); the classic dimension of lineal time, or ‘entropy arrow’, and a 5^{th} new ‘dimotion’ of social evolution and information, responsible for the arrow of life, organic evolution of parts into wholes and the ‘mind-structure’ of languages that mirror those organic systems in mind-mappings, of which the mathematical and logic and visual language are the most remarkable… It is a fascinating Universe, which humans don’t understand because they drag through memorial routine and dogmatic beliefs many errors, we can trace to Greek geometry and Aristotelian logic of abstract points and single time causality, hardly corrected in 2000 years and the astounding incapacity of huminds to understand the mind ‘distorts’ reality and selects information, compressing all the scales of space-time into a single continuum, all the motions of time into still images (so we don’t see the motion of the earth), eliminating all the information which we cannot translate into those 3 languages; despite the fact that for 500 years we have been watching those scales of the ‘5^{th} dimension’ with telescopes and microscopes (naïve realism).

@berrant Egocy, selective information (¬∆S) and inflationary repetition (S≈T) are the 3 errors of all languages to correct. And this is specially needed to fully grasp the main errors of physics, which denies all other languages and organic scalar properties of Nature’s physical systems, reducing its description to mathematical properties and accepting as dogma those ideal errors of mathematics as the absolute 0 (false big-bang singularity). It is not my fault and I can do nothing to humble the reader into going back to school, It is in fact structural that all huminds measure reality from its language, and it is part of the program that makes selfish fractal points to perish because they cannot evolve socially into larger organic wholes and respect the laws of the Universe. Still we shall prove ad nauseam that all what exists is a space-time ‘organism gifted of mind called logos’ Plato of a ‘higher logic than man’s’ (Augustine), as all ‘points are a world in themselves’ Leibniz, and deduce all laws of science from the simple laws of conservation of time, origin of the 3 ages of life and death of all systems, and the entangled topologies of space, origin of the organic structures of reality. And deduce from the elements of that reality, ∆-scales, S-pace, T-ime, all the mirrors of @-mind languages and ¬entropic limits of exi=st¡ence.

** **

**S@:** **MATHEMATICAL STIENCES**

Reality is simple: everything is part of an entangled Superorganisms in space (in any of its different versions from the simplest wave-like herds, to the more complex network superorganisms that ‘peer’ through fractal networks invaginated in lower scales different planes of existence), which traces a worldcycle in time (also with different degrees of complexity from simpler π-cycles in a single scale to complex travels, w through different scales of the fifth dimension in palingenetic, life and worldcycles).

So each r set of languages will be mirroring this process of entanglement in simultaneous space and derive through ages of time of any part or whole it studies. When studying parts, it might reduce enormously the latitude of analysis in time and space of the whole process but essentially what it will be studied will be a mini-cycle of time or a mini-organic part of a whole. And even in those cases within that minimal part/action it can apply a fractal principle of looking in detail the fractal point and the action and subdivide it in smaller parts, which ultimately will form a worldcycle of actions and a whole sub-organism. I.e. your hand will be a part of a limb, but it will have its 3 ternary elements, the O-wrists to control informative complex motions, the sustain, the flat stronger body of the hand and its own limbs, the fingers.

So reality must be study with mirror languages that do also show the elements of the whole: sub mirrors for the 5 dimotions; sequential worldcycles staged through the operands of the language, and elements that define the growth of dimensions of the system from points into gathering of points (lines) into gathering of lines (topological planes) and so it will have both a language of space and a language of time to describe that growth and synchronous simultane3ous entanglements, and the phases of life and death.

How does it in mathematics is obvious: geometry shows the different stages of growth of the system, and its entanglements in 3 fundamental scales of growth, from the point to the line to the plane, which we shall expand to mimic better reality into fractal points, waves and networks and topologic organisms made of 3 entangled waves/networks/lines.

Stiences have sub disciplines for space and one better suited to study temporal energy. And so mathematics can be divided in spatial geometry->topology and temporal algebra->functions of numbers, which form the essential Si=Te symmetry between S@ geometric space and ¬∆T scalar numbers and so the growth of dimensions is mimicked in algebraic space with the fundamental of its operand, which is the product that combines S and T dimensions of growth to bring a larger being, and again we have 3 fundamental powers that bring 3 dimensions from point to line to plane into algebra, and the more sophisticated but similar concepts of a derivative and an integral that also makes the system grow or diminish in dimensions. One of the distinctions worth to study in detail being the approximation and differences between a power law and an integral law. Why there are unlike in geometry 2 forms to explain in algebra growth of form and dimensionality? Why algebraic numbers have more variations that geometry? The ultimate answer being that geometry is more restricted as it establish systems that do work in space, and fit in the limited space of a still mind. So by efficiency and limits of the mind geometry is more reduced. Algebra includes all the possibilities of time some of which will never realize.

*We shall not study here the Geometry of fractal points=numbers and how they build networks=supœrganisms of time-space, as we do it in the paper on the Universe in Space. Instead we will briefly summarize the elements of Non-Aristotelian algebra, and the study of numbers, which are the mathematical elements of ‘scale’ of size and time frequency that determine the absolute arrow of time-motion. *

** **

**ST±¡: ALGEBRA**

Numbers are the science of scale, studied by algebra, which also digs into time theory through the use of operands and SóT feed-back equations.

** 5 Dimotion Operands; 5 Non-E Postulates. Si=Te Point Number Symmetry. **

Pentalogic is best to analyze a superorganism in space with a higher truth, from 5 different perspectives to discover its form & motion in ‘space’, ‘time’ &’scale’, between its ‘entropic limits’ and linguistic ‘minds’ that performs its 5 survival dimotions to Maximize its function of existence, and integrates its parts into wholes. Mathematics as a mirror language thus uses pentalogic to study 5D fractal **points** of **space**; its **time operands**, **scalar, social numbers; minds=frames of reference and entropic limits,** which entangled together by the laws of pentalogic form the 5 elements of ¬∆@st , dust of space-time, the substance of which we are all made. As such is the most experimental of all stiences.

**Its 3 ages. **5D mathematics *returns to the mature experimental age of the discipline that went as all systems do through 3 ages from a simple *lineal age of Greek Geometry to its curved realist age of calculus that added motion & scales of 5D finitesimal derivatives and 4D wholes to better mirror the fractal Universe, to a 3^{rd} age of excessive informative fictions, when it abandons its realist foundations, when during the German creationist ego-trip of Hilbert and his Cantorian paradises, he says, ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ thinking he shares the only language ‘God’ uses to create reality. Hence mathematics is no longer considered an a posteriori mirror of scalar timespace but its ‘generator’ and as the first ‘Aristotelian cause’, needs no experimental proof but rather the opposite: reality exists only if it can be casted into mathematical models (‘only what we measure is real’ Planck). So mathematicians abandon space points, scale numbers and time operands as the 3 mathematical images generated by the ∆st Universe, using instead ‘Cantorian’ sets as its ‘imagined’ units nowhere to be seen in reality. And Hilbert affirms the self-contained Axiomatic method of proof, NOT connected to the world, despite Gödel’s incompleteness theorem- *a baroque inward looking 3 ^{rd} age of excessive form proper of all systems *we abandon to return to its empirical foundations, now formulated in terms of those 5 structural elements that create reality, mimicked by the main mathematical elements. Since mathematics reflect the properties of scalar space and cyclical time in its main elements, points numbers and operands entangled in feed-back ≤=≥ functions.

**Its sub-disciplines. **As a mirror language we couple the 5D elements of reality (entropy, scales, minds, space and time) or ¬∆@st elements (Deep time view) with the 5 disciplines of mathematics as experimental mirrors of those 5 elements: Space=geometry, ∆: Scales: Number theory, S<=>T Dimotions and Symmetries=algebra; which analysis is best for time motions; @-minds = Analytic geometry (Frames of reference) and philosophy of mathematics; while entropy, negation of information appears in the limits of calculus, inverse operands and exponential functions.

We couple the minimal quanta of those 5 elements or 5 Dimotions=actions (short view), with the minimal elements of Algebra (Operands: & inverse entropic functions):1D: sin/cos, 4D:±, 3D: x÷, 4D: xª √, 5D:∫∂).) and with the 3±¡ topological varieties and Euclidean dimensions of the Universe (long lineal limbs/fields: 2D, wide reproductive hyperbolic body-waves, 3D, tall, informative high spherical particle/heads, 1D; and networks of fractal points that create them, 4D or dissolve entropically 5D; which ensemble into spatial superorganisms tracing worldcycles (medium view).

**How a system evolves its dimensionality is the game in any logic language. **

As it is the game of reproduction of waves of form what the Universe is all about: A form reproducing, downwards as it is similar to its ∑∆-1 scale.

It is through dimensional growth, how the symmetry between time an space, between geometric states and moving time creates the future through existential re=produ=actions:

A point starts a motion, which makes a new form. The first point can move in lines or rotate on itself, or move in circles, or form spheres, or shrunk. And those 5 Dimotions start the game.

The point becomes a line, which can be a straight line or a zigzag √line, or a rotary circle or π-line. 3 Subspecies immediately appear: The line and the √2 triangular wave and the circle.

Evolution that diverges topologically from the first reproductive process of a line and a cycle and a wave, and so subspecies of dimensional growth appear. How we study them, with non-e postulates in geometry, with Dimotional existential algebra in algebra.

As we go then through products that create new dimensions in algebra we mimic a mathematical, geometric process of growth in Numbers. So in math, growth of numbers and growth of points become in the next ∆+1 plane, geometric figures in parallel to growth of numbers into functions. Growth is studied with Si=Te parallels.

Let’s do a fast review of a few themes of geometry & Nº theory escaping algebra, as its complexity goes beyond this intro. And we shall before the end of spring post an article on it

**NUMBER THEORY**

**S-Numbers: Polygons as vital organisms**

Numbers are social gathering of indistinguishable forms. When studied in space thus numbers must have regular efficient configurations. So ∆§ numbers are 2D polygons or 3D Platonic solids.

Its importance in vital topology lays on the fact that polygons start the creation of superorganisms, with a membrane – the polygon proper, which closes a vital space and can by connection of points through lines-waves of communication, create a central singularity. Thus numbers as fractal points grow organisms. And this is self-evident in the study of Nature. We can then study together with entangled pentalogic both ‘scales’ of social numbers as ‘growth in time’ of polygons, efficient configurations in ‘surface’ worlds (land, water surfaces), and polyhedrons, which will be efficient configurations in a larger ∆+1 3D world (water depth, atmosphere, vacuum for atomic and molecular scales).

**The Decametric scale. Growth of Dimensions (d) and Dimotional functions from 1 to 10.**

Polygonal numbers are best to represent the social evolution of forms into new scales that emerge as envelopes into wholes. The immediate decametric scale of numbers give us then the perfect polygonal forms of bidimensional space:

Nº 0: Absolute zero does not exist, as the Universe has horror vacuum, and so the 0-1 line doesn’t belong to the Natural Numbers, but represents the ∆-1 plane, where 0 is the value of the minimal finitesimal, themes those studied in depth in our paper on 5D Algebra.

**Nº 1: ***1d: 1D¡: Perception §ð. It *is the unit-whole, the unit circle performing, the perceptive 1 Dimotion, the fractal point It has 0 dimensions in Euclidean geometry but 1 dimension in 5D theory. Since fractal points have volume.

**Nº 2:*** 2d, 2D¡:Locomotion $T. *The line-wave of distance-motion made of fractal points communicated between two poles has 2 Dimensions. It is the reproductive couple. It forms the axial flow of any spherical informative topology. In Non-E geometry forms the antipodal points that a singularity reproduces to form its bilateral symmetry.

**Nº 3: ****2 ***d, 3D¡: Si=Te.* Its dimotion is Reproduction. As a couple or antipodal mirror points forms a gender symmetry that creates the 3^{rd}, ‘son’ element in its middle point of communication.

**Triangle.*** 3d: S-st-T* As we already noticed synoptic numbers give birth to multiple paths in spatial geometry. So 3 has the first variation in the triangle, which has 3 Dimensions, as points have volume, and whose main Dimotion is to act as the spearhead of locomotion, with its leading vertex to perceive (1D) or break (5D), entropically the resistance of motion. As it can enclose a vital space and perform the 3 physiological functions with its specialized ternary points, the head, one back point to reproduce seeding information and the other inverse to expel entropic motion, we can already consider a triangle an autonomous organic system, the first whole without the need to perceive internal scalar parts.

So 3 is also the first classic 2 Dimensional geometry: The triangle, the perfect form of lineal-motion geometry. And from then on numbers multiply its ‘Dimotions’, variations of forms, and vital geometries. So we shall just consider a few details of a field which as all those of 5D mathematics is ginormous. I.e.:

**Nº 4: **3d, *4D¡§ð.*** ** The square’s main Dimotion is social Evolution, in 2 D by merging two triangles, as the most stable social evolutionary form to ‘fill’ a flat field. In 1D as the social evolution of two couples of 2 points.

**Nº 4: ***4d***, 4D¡ ***§ð.* Its main variation is the* first 3-dimensional classic geometry, the tetrahedron (4dimensional in 5D formalism as each of its point has an inner volume).*

** Nº 5: ***5d*, Scalar Dimension¡ The Pentagon has a deserved mystical pedigree since polygons *finally enter the fifth dimension proper as * a pentagram reproduces with its internal diagonals a scalar inverted mirror form of itself. So we define a Pentagon *as the first form of the 4th/5th dimension that reproduces its very same form, by connection of its 5 points creating an internal smaller 5D social form, or alternatively it expands entropically by prolonging its sides creating the pentagram. *So with the pentagon we close the 5 Dimotions of existence, forming a pentalogic scale fundamental to 5D theory.

Let us then mention from 6 to 10 only the main dualities of numbers; its main Dimotion and Dimensional forms, going back to classic Euclidean dimensions, to make it simpler:

**Nº 6: ***2d, 4D¡: social evolution.* The hexagon is the strongest form to cover a 2d world, as graphene shows, because it closes with ‘3’ diameters its perimeter. It is the perfect pi, which in physics implies a non-E geometry of maximal Planck mass. It creates also a highly connected • central singularity by joining opposite points. So its hard membrane and connected center forms the strongest organic system on 2 Dimensions.

**Nº 6: ***3d*, 3D¡ ST. In 3 Dimensions is the Octahedron, studied in non-E Geometry as the first reproductive bilateral Si=Te symmetry in 3 Dimensions (whereas the line is the mirror symmetry in 1 classic dimension and the 2 triangles of the square in 2 dimensions).

Si=Te symmetries. We can introduce at this stage the ‘Temporal symmetry of sequential numbers’, as it is possible not only to describe as we do here in this introduction to 5D mathematics its simultaneous superorganisms in space, but analyze sequential numbers in time; as ‘years’ and ‘decades’ of a worldcycle; which also divides in 3×3=9 x 9 ‘life baguas’, but we leave for an enlarged future upgrading of this paper. As we want to race into the tetraktys.

**Nº 7… ***o*f the same family than the Pentagon, with similar properties, cannot be constructed only from the interaction of a perfect entropic |-line and O-cycle (compass and ruler), but needs *to bisect its angles/networks in 3 sub-angles; making more difficult its reproduction in our mental 4D ‘light spacetime’. But in a 5D Universe, *enough Regular heptagons can tile the hyperbolic plane, as shown in a Poincare disk model projection. It is the reason why flocks of birds looking at 7 companions can form a perfect superorganism in4D space.

In the graph another key mirror symmetry between numbers and vital topology: §ð particle/heads of information are tiled by informative pentagons; flat Euclidean space is tiled by hexagonal forms of maximal entropic resistance; but the hyperbolic plane of body-waves of vital energy is tiled by heptagons… a theme of advanced 5D geometry…

**Nº 8: ***2d, 2ST.*** ** The octagon of the family of the hexagon, with similar properties is a bridge *towards the infinite points of the circle; fairly redundant, in form… as numbers in 1-2d become now more important as ST-systems of timespace motion; where the 8 plays the role of the final life-cycle. It is in the time the closure of existence – the final state of decay; for each ‘series’ of time-space systems – from the human ages in its 2 scales of life (80 years) and civilizations (800 year cycles of cultures); and have the same role for machines (stock cycles) and physical systems (over 80 z, elements become radioactive). So* as *the fundamental series of spatial geometries closes with the heptagon, the main symmetry of higher numbers belongs to time ages. *

**Nº 8: ***3d, 3§ð.*** ***So 8 belongs properly to the geometry to 3 D platonic solids, considered next, where 8 is* the cube.

**Nº 9-10-11 tetraktys form – transcendental triad of perfect whole**: **the ‘closure’ of an organic geometry, **

*2d $T-1D¡***: ***Tetraktys* in which *the 3 networks within the system form the 3 surface angles of the triangle, playing the specialized roles of the 3 physiological networks of motion < iteration > information of the system. But 9 has NOT A POINT on the singularity center; it is a mindless system, which requires the 10th point forming finally a ***tetraktys, the sacred ***number of Pythagorism and Hebrew geomancy (graph):*

* It has * a singularity, a black ball that communicates all other physiological triangles, becoming the inner mind/heart of the organism, doubling as 11^{th}, since it regulates the inner body connecting its internal part but also becomes its antipodal ’emerging’ point in a higher ∆+1 scale; starting a new game. So 10-11 completes the symmetry between time ages, worldcycles, dimensions and spatial forms, becoming a new unit of a new logarithmic social whole of 10^{10} cycles of time an population.

Such polygonal numbers will grow from the 1 seed to the 9+1=10^{th} most efficient scale, through ternary and dual symmetries, which in existential algebra might then loose the ideal form. I.e. a human being, has a tetraktys of 10-physiological system (3 digestive, 3 reproductive-blood and 3 sensorial systems fusion by the ‘whole’ brain system.**.**

Pythagoras as Plato latter said that numbers are forms, as they were in the earlier age of mathematical geometry, where a number was a group of points, whose *form mattered. So he realized 10 was the perfect number, because of its perfect form, which in fact becomes the 11th dimension of a new ‘whole’.*

And indeed the internal structure of any being reaches its perfect efficiency with a 3 x 3 +0-mind symmetry of form and function; where each part-number performs one of the 3 physiological entropy, energy, information jobs of the system and the central mind-number in contact with them all coordinates its functions.

So we also talk of 10 inner dimensions or ‘sub-systems’, represented by a tetraktys.

**POLIHEDRONS**

3D platonic solids are 4, 6, 8, the only decametric regular numbers in 3 dimensions. Then we have only two more in the 20 scale, 12 and 20 vertices, and that’s all!!!

They play each one a role as actors of one of the 5th dimotions – the decametric 3 completing a 4,6,8 Fractal generator:

$T-tetrahedron (legs)<Si=Te-Octahedron (body) > §ð-Cube (head)

Indeed, the tetrahedron is basically a triangle in 3D, acting as the spearhead of a locomotion; which in timespace is traced by lineal members moving on steps as your legs do. Hence its 2D¡=$T function. The Octahedron has a clear mirror symmetry as all reproductive dual genders do – already posted in academia.edu its paper; and the cube, is the form of the 3 closer to a filling sphere with a well-connected singularity of maximal symmetry with the outer world.

So this leaves the two complex dimotions of social evolution and entropy for the triangular icosahedrons, *with maximal number of social triangular units (20 faces of the simplest 2D surface)*. And the 5^{th} dimotion of entropy for the pentagonal dodecahedron… Alas again the pentagonal evil Death symbol again… Why? That I won’t tell…

Just quote the master of ‘transcendental philosophical geometry’, Mr. Plato who affirmed that, “The Universe is the body of an organism whose logic mind we call God.’ & ‘God used a dodecahedron to design the Universe’ *Plato*

Ok, I’ll tell. Think in vital terms. Imagine a Universe with those 5 species, no curves. The 3 first are the smallish ones. Cubes perceive, and keep quiet, hidden, filling easily empty space; its survival strategy – social growth, with its identical forms, repeating by the mere motion as lines first, flat squares and giant 3D cubes. It is a single gender ‘feminine’, informative reproduction. The other series does the same but with mirror gender symmetry, as the triangles of tetrahedrons expand from 3 to 4 and peg inversely into octahedrons and then grow into icosahedrons.

But the dodecahedron is NOT concerned with the survival strategy of reproduction. He rather eats them all!!

How is this? Easy, the dodecahedron has the largest mouth and the largest volume, even larger than the icosahedron, so it swallows them, in an action of vital geometric feeding; and once caged inside, remember pentagons are the ‘first’ polygons, which can do a smaller replica of itself, NOT a perceptive singularity but a *crunching stomach*.

Each point is a cell of a dodecahedron. As it happens there are as many faces in the icosahedron to eat as vertices in the dodecahedron that feeds on it – both connected through the golden ratio of feeding and reproductive events, a+b (feeding)/a = a/b; a key relation of top predator/prey forms. And so it opens its mouth, swallows it, cages it, crunches it and burps (; But the pentalogic Universe allows different dimotions. So now imagine instead a reproductive event. It is not far fetched. Biologists consider that ovules first ate sperm cells and latter they learned to merge their genes.

So once a ‘male’ entropic dodecahedron has eaten the ‘female’, reproductive icosahedron it can actually merge into a mixed form, by merely attaching to each dodecahedron point a triangular face, becoming the icosidodecahedron (ab.‘dodecosahedron’) – a new species which is more perfect than its parental ones, as it shares the information of both. It is a first gender case in ideal geometry, since *Gender reproduction happens in all scales of stience,* from the simplest circular ovum swallowing a lineal seminal seed – a cyclical and lineal form, merging into an |xO=ø topology, to the previous example of ilogic mathematics.

The dodecahedron social points, aka numbers feed on the icosahedron faces, reducing them either by swallowing them, which will result in a growth of size of the dodecahedron or by merging into a reproductive evolutionary process far more interesting, as any merged system is more efficient than its 2 separated parts-species, a more evolved form, which survives better in a process similar to all genetic-memetic-reproductive processes, that create in any stientific scale more efficient systems by communication.

Indeed, the dodecosahedron is the top predator polyhedron form, as it has ALL the ilogic elements and symmetries that enhance survival in the fractal Timespace Universe: individual ego-centered points, shaping inner trilogic systems in yellow, tetralogic dual triangles married to dual pentagons, decalogic reproductive bilateral social parts, plus all the magic stable numbers of vertices, edges, faces & diagonals, despite its external ‘soft membrane’ –unlike its ‘dual figures’ the Catalan solids that *show a defensive external membrane*, in which the swallowed form emerges into convex ‘teeth’, but has a less efficient internal organic structure:

In geometry, we say that any polyhedron is associated with a second **dual** figure, where the vertices of one correspond to the faces of the other and the edges between pairs of vertices of one correspond to the edges between pairs of faces of the other. The graph is an example from the other dual top predator/prey series, a cube of larger ‘mouths’ and bigger volume-spatial efficiency swallowing an smaller octahedron of lesser volume.

What differs now is an added property – a topologic ‘defensive’ concave and convex dual form which can establish as Vaughan found in defensive flat geometries for the French army, entropic expansive concave points and smaller implosive, informative sinks, which maximize the entropic reach of cannonballs with minimal surface exposure to the external army. Indeed, a ‘mathematical’ ideal duality, we shall find latter on in the stience of biology between top predators of soft membrane but much more efficient inner structure and defensive armored animals with less evolved internal networks (squids, with eye-perception and evolved nervous systems vs. armored trilobites, simpler organisms; Tyrannosaur Rex vs. armored triceratops, Lions vs. armored, skin thick, horned herbivores) and social systems (defensive walled cities vs. nomadic horse armies).

We are all VITAL geometries and so the rules of geometry carry from ¡logic spacetime to ilogic mathematics, to the different stiences of vital reality where those forms acquire topological motion. The specific case of polyhedrons being of special interest to molecular chemistry, which we shall study in detail when upgrading to 5D the discipline (as those are processes that do happen in solid crystals).

**Vital transformations.**

Though polytopes are all essentially in topologic terms spherical membrains, its study brings topology down to the details of its scalar social numbers or parts of a network of points; allowing its dynamical transformations.

A key sub-field of 5D vital geometry is the analysis of the Disomorphisms and symmetries between polytopes to understand how they transform into each other through 5D entropic, 3D reproductive & 4D evolutionary dimotions.

**4D: social evolution.** All solids with a center singularity evolve their surface increasing their vertex, and growing their volume/body ratio towards the perfect relationship of the sphere – which we consider *the 6th perfect solid of ∞ vertex. *Among the Platonic solids, either the dodecahedron or the icosahedron may be seen as the best approximation to the sphere. The icosahedron has the largest number of faces and the largest dihedral angle, it hugs its inscribed sphere the most tightly, and its surface area to volume ratio is closest to that of a sphere of the same size (i.e. either the same surface area or the same volume.) The dodecahedron, on the other hand, has the smallest angular defect, the largest vertex solid angle, and it fills out its circumscribed sphere the most.

**5D: Entropic devolutions **mediated mostly by the 5D dodecahedron. Feeding though requires a degree of similarity, reached ad maximal for the dodecahedron and icosahedron. What makes them *identical to switch from 5D mind state to 4D entropy state is A*pollonius’ finding that the ratio of its surface is the same that the ratio of its volumes:

* So i*ts content of ST vital energy is the same; but as the dodecahedron dies, it changes first its tight surface, which as we know in death processes grows in excess detaching itself from its volume – from 12 to 20 elements (another key number, with many vital interpretations, being indeed the number of amino acid variations on the protein surface of living solids, and so on)… and then reached its maximal form on the stable surface, it can only switch arrow of temporal energy.

As death is exactly that process: when all the vital energy is consumed and the skin is fractured ad maximal and no more motion can be extracted from the body, the system changes arrow and decomposes back to the past.

Other feeding case is the parasitic covering of one form by another. So the dodecahedron is generated (Euclid) from the cube, *by covering it as a parasitic membrane, unlike the 3 other species, which can be considered to reproduce the same form. *All this might seem trivial to mathematicians, but they would miss the point of what 5D mathematics tries to show – the vital nature of space… which must be explained as the ultimate formal substance of reality, having organic living properties, simplified into a still mirror, NOT the other way around.

1D. Perception. If the sphere is the perfect platonic solid with absolute symmetry to perceive an ‘equal distant’ territorial larger sphere focused in the central point without deformation (Poincare Conjecture), platonic solids are next in regular symmetries, hence as they are ‘economic’ in points compared to spheres their efficiency makes them to repeat constantly in the Universe on the simplest forms of chemical, atomic existence (simplex platonic solids), NOT in the planetary orbits, where Mr. Kepler thought God has drawn them (:

We see once more at play the scalar laws of inversion of form, from the ‘galatom’, or spherical atom, given the ginormous number of ‘static photonic points’ trapped in its electronic nebulae/star plane (quantum/ cosmological scales) to the molecule or lineal polytopes of minimal quanta. Molecular surfaces tend to be as the graph shows, perfectly regular polytopes for the singularity to apperceive through the Van der waals forces of electronic perception the gravitational and electromagnetic forces of the world – reason why crystals, regular atomic systems which can ‘scan’ reality in a near-spherical are formed as units basically with those forms and the strongest ‘pre-cyclical’ pi=3 hexagonal system (which also can form the ultimate platonic dual systems, a pentagonal, hexagonal cover, the strongest ‘Fuller dome’.

In Nature we see the all pervading forms of maximal resistance in the membranes of physical T.œs. In crystals the cubic system is overwhelming. In metals only cubic and hexagonal systems exist. In architecture the only systems which can be grown in size without external reinforcements maintaining its stability ad infinitum are the Fuller Domes, made with triangular, hexagonal ‘pi=3’ and hexagonal & pentagonal combinations, whose form grows ‘ad infinitum’ towards the perfect platonic solid – the sphere.

**The cube, a 3D st solid with informative roles. **

In that regard, another ‘inverse duality’ in 3D happens between the sphere and the cube, similar to that between the triangle and the circle in 2D, with inverse properties:

The cube is excellent for social evolution into larger networks, while the sphere tends to be lonely. The cube is the preferred crystal form for matter to reproduce filling ad maximal space and socially evolve, from 3D to its social larger 5D whole grouping.

How then one transforms into the other? If the triangle achieves the feat by rotation or social evolution into hexagonal π=3 circles, the cube is the closest form to become by elliptic deformation the sphere, in another st beat, as it bloats feeding on energy into spheres, it deflates back into a cube. So the triangle becomes a circle by adding a 4D rotary motion and the cube becomes the sphere by adding a 5D feeding motion.

Since the key function of reality is reproduction and all is motion’ the survival of the cube resides in its simplex reproduction by mere translation in space: a line that moves grows a dimension into a plane that moves and grows into a cube that moves and grows into a line restarting the game, and adding a new 5D scale. Yet each growth changes the function of the form according to the generator function that *changes S-topology & T- age, hence function as a system grows in ∆-scale, such as:* **∆-1: $< ∆º ST > ∆+1>ð§**

The partial function of the fractal generator that encodes within it all laws of the universe means in topology the transformation of topologic varieties, as we grow in scale, from lineal limbs/potentials at ∆-1, into Ø-ST-iterative space-time into ∆+1 O-spherical particles-heads of information.

The cube is the ð§tate, excellent for social evolution into larger networks, the preferred crystal form for matter to socially evolve, from 3D to its social 5D grouping into minds, the closest form to become by elliptic deformation the sphere, in another st beat, as it bloat feeding on energy into sphere, it depletes into cube.

And then again as the form shows, the cube displaces to form a line on the ∆+2 plane, NOT a fourth-dimensional spatial being, which does NOT exist.

So if we start the reproduction of cubes in the cubic ∆-1 line its function is 2D lineal motion; then the ∆º plane is an ST reproductive body-wave form and the ∆+1 cube the §ð informative function (with maximal volume and minimal perimeter compared to the line and the plane)

And then again, the cube displaces to form a larger line on the ∆+2 plane, NOT a fourth-dimensional tesseract, which does NOT exist in reality regardless of its usefulness to prove and model Si=Te dimotions.

So given the *reproductive nature of motion*, we talk of distance as the sum of adjacent ternary ‘stœps’: the cube state of a ‘squared’ line stops and chooses any of its 6 directions of motion; then it reproduces in present sliced planes on the chosen direction and moves as a zigzag line, stopping, iterating and stepping as all reproductive motions do. Beyond 3 dimensions there are no more dimensions in a single plane, so the cube generates then a line of the larger scale, transposing its function again, completing a full zero-sum cycle in scales, creating a replica of itself in the larger ∆+1 world.

So we observe in those reproductive translations two symmetries *at work together:*

*$≈t≈$… Translation* = reproduction of motion through the $-length dimension, causing….

*∆o-> ∆+1: ST+ST+ST: Reproduction of form through the width dimension, *which makes the being, grow in scales of the fifth dimension, symmetric to the change of position in timespace causing…

∆-1: $< ∆º ST > ∆+1>ð§ a change in its topological functions=forms.

The next form of reproduction of the 3 varieties of topology is the rotary circle, which becomes a sphere with one more dimension, the strongest membrane that encloses and captures the vital, hyperbolic energy of the being. And then it becomes a toroid, which appears as a larger circle.

And it is worth to notice the circle has only 2 states as circle and sphere, unlike the cube which has 3 Dimotional states as cube, line and square; a fact of paramount importance when considering the different speeds of motion, reproduction, explosion and implosion along the 5Dimotional events of lineal v. circular forms that paradoxically favors the circle over the line and explains why 1D vortices accelerate faster than expansive lineal big-bangs.

*But on the negative side, the ‘cube is a solid form’, but the reproduced cycle becomes an* ’empty sphere’. It is not a ball, only the surface that encloses a volume of empty space – the simplest, strongest topology normally made at the ∆-1 scale of strong triangles of entropic nature. So the circle becomes the membrane that acts as the entropic envelope that closes the ‘empty vacuum’, becoming a non-Euclidean Klein disk whose inner vital space can never reach because the dense membrane will kill its lighter internal particles – and indeed, we shall see how atoms and galaxies – the two limits of our scales of form, follow such pattern. Since even if the form is a disk, while it can create in the first rotation a dense sphere, in the second rotation it can only form a hollow toroid.

But the most efficient form of reproduction is that of waves and bodies, with its ‘networks’ that branch and hence reproduce in an exponential growth a single point; hence the hyperbolic form of the ‘growth’ phase of waves; and the enormous multiplication of ‘surface’ of a fractal networks.

Finally all those forms can transform into each other: cubes can feed and curve elliptically into cubes and lines are small stœps of curved geodesics, both type of iteration can merge, so lineal limbs/potentials at ∆-1, Ø-ST-iterative waves and ∆+1 O-spherical particles-heads of information can in rare occasions transform into each other, but specially *can transfer flows of energy and information among them, which at ∆-1 level will acquire the shape of each of the 3 adjacent topologies of the supœrganism.*

So functions and forms do change but all possible events are encoded in the generator and so if we understand the underlying ∆st basic laws of the Universe encoded on it, everything keeps falling into place. And those laws are vital laws that have a survival purpose. For example, the hollow sphere KILLS by enclosing and trapping as lionesses do hunting zebras by enclosing them or dogs shepherding and enclosing sheeple, moving around in fast circles as ‘angular momentum’ that becomes by virtue of T=S a vital membrain in motion. Then the membrane will sharply penetrate perpendicularly the zebra herd and kill; the military border of a human social territory will give a coup d’état and collapse into the capital and conquer… the battle will be lost once in Cannae, Hannibal had encircled the prey (graph, where the red color of entropy represents the dimotion of the horse that ‘closes the roman pray’ as a moving membrain like the dog does).

So ∆st laws might seem abstract to you but are the stuff of which experimental survival and existence is made.

**Hyper-dimensional polygons.**

* *As Si=Te 5D metrics implies a dimension of space is another form to interpret a motion in time, an important field of 5D geometry is the study of 4D (2S=2T) regular polytopes, which close the entangled scales of regular social numbers as T-Dimotions or S-till elements that ‘construct’ the real structures of the Universe, to extract 5D¡somorphic laws; even if we do NOT see static fixed 4D forms in our Universe (as 5D includes entropy, which is the negative destruction of all others, 4D is the limit of constructive engagement, often of 2 still polygons with 2 motions=degrees of freedom). We just make some key statements on this discipline:

With the simplification of the inner volume of fractal points, we can match polytope laws with the symmetries of Spacetime beings. So 1D polygon of points with no parts -open lines equivalent to 1D cylindrical limbs/fields are ∞ (Natural Numbers); 2D polygons akin to cyclical, O-particles/heads are ∞ in flat space, *& 3 hyperbolic polygons, equivalent to Ø-body-wave reproductive systems, intersection of 2D lineal & cyclic forms are ∞ in 3D spatial information.*

*So there are ∞ growing ensembles of 1D limbs/fields + 2D particle/heads=3D hyperbolic body-waves.*

Growth of complex finite polytopes peaks in 4D, as further increases of dimensions reduce them to the ternary ‘single plane’ structure of a triangular, square and pentagonal ternary ensemble; *which means there are no more dimensions beyond the 4D 2S=2T systems, and all further ‘Dimensional growth’ is a dimension on new scales of 5D which are memoriless, erasing the previous emergent complexity of the fractal point, which stays on its inner parts. (Because the hyperbolic body-system is more complex being its minimal form 3D, its ternary growth peaks at 5D).*

In the side the existence of a regular 4-polytope is constrained by the existence of the regular polyhedral which form its cells and a dihedral angle constraint sin π /p sin π / r < cos π /q to ensure that the cells meet to form a closed 3-surface. And yet despite those restrictions we have 6 polytopes. And this matter because our world as in relativity can be analyzed in a single plane as a 4D ensemble of its 3 classic dimensions and a time motion of social organization, as *the 2 inverse dimotions of entropy and information do **NOT happen within the same event simultaneously in ‘regular entanglements’. *So pentagonal polytopes make no sense, being the 5^{th} dimotion entropy the destruction of the regular in-form-ation shared by them all.* Thus the most complex 4D structure of regular points are the 120-600 dual pentagonal mirror ‘gender symmetry’, *reached through combinations of 5 Dimotions, 6 ‘triangular radians’ of a π sphere (∝ polytope) & its 120 angles. The result are the final stable 120 dodecaplex and 600 tetraplex maximal figures of 4Dimensional geometries. And we shall find this 120 magic final number in the few cases the system is perfect enough to transcend the octaplex to be the real final ‘island of stability’ in atomic systems or oldest possible age in the very few cases the system transcends the 80 years ‘radioactive barrier’. And we can imagine the 120-600 vertex entanglement the limit of ¡logic evolution of a complex social system in the Universe.

But all those polytopes must be understood as ternary systems which reproduce in motion forming a larger 5D scale; so 4D is a motion, and that is indeed how geometers construct them, bringing to each 3D point an internal volume; that is, making each vortex of a 3D polygon a new ‘square’ to form the tesseract which is equivalent to ‘enlarge’ its inner form. While another 4D polytope will be merely the motion of the square that becomes a larger ‘1D’ line in a larger world, as we make a 2d plane by moving across a 1D line. What about the sphere? It is the ultimate regular polytope and so we wonder how a 4D sphere looks like. The answer is also telling of the 5D Si=Te structure of the Universe, where time motions and spatial dimensions are equivalent – but only motions truly exist. So we have to consider beyond 3D, new spatial dimensions to be beyond algebraic manipulation time motions. This is also our experimental evidence, when we generalize what we see of a 3D sphere as it moves through a 3D plane: a series of growing and diminishing cuts, passing through a 2D world.

And so a 4D sphere moving, passing through a 3D world appears as a growing and diminishing sphere, *indistinguishable from a *5D Universe in which *a supœrganism is tracing a worldcycle of exist¡ence growing between 2 planes of the 5 ^{th} dimension*.

*Thus we postulate an Einsteinian “Principle of Equivalence’*as a proof of the existence of a 5

^{th}dimension of parts growing into wholes:

‘A 4D spatial system moving with a 5^{th} dimension of time, IS (equivalent to) a 3D spatial system with two scalar dimensions of growth and diminution in inverse ∆±1 scales.”

So beyond our perceivable entangled 3D holographic parts, all further dimensions are scalar motions of time (4D, 5D inverse, SS-formal, implosive or TT-entropic expansive dimotions). Specifically we differentiate dimensional growth

**Si=Te.** In a single plane, beyond 3D spatial still forms, new dimensions are temporal, moving ones, which only through the ‘persistence’ of a memory create new dimensions of space, (as explained on our analysis of fractal dimensions). Motion become reproduction of information, and social forms of growth – a cube moving to in-form a squared line, sphere turning into a dual spiral diminishing and growing to form a larger flat disk…)

**∆±¡.**In scalar planes, when the form is static in the same position the being experiences a travel through scales the fifth dimension, growing its inner parts from points into ‘cells’. This in ideal polytopes means to draw in each vertex a new tetrahedron, cube or dodecahedron. Or as a whole growing or diminishing in size-scale.

So that is the dynamic reality of 4D spheres passing through our world, which do NOT exist as such, but as Si=Te for any mental spatial mirror that trans-forms T-motions into S-till dimensions, 4D polytopes are useful to model and solve mathematical problems of real physics, by the algebraic method of converting a time motion into a geometric still spatial dimension, so 4D polytopes can represent real 3D T.œs with one locomotion or two locomotions, the second one an TT-scattering entropic dimotion of scale.

**RECAP. Pentalogic of polytopes**: **Platonic solids correspond to 5Dimotions.**

The 3 simplest 3D numbers form a fractal generator of vital topology and the 2 Complex the ∆±¡ dimotions:

$T-tetrahedron (legs)<Si=Te-Octahedron (body) > §ð-Cube (head)

4D: Social evolution: The icosahedron is made of triangles evolving socially the simplest tetrahedrons’ ∆states.

5D: Entropy. The dodecahedron is the most efficient and feeds on all of them.

*Polytopes with more than 3D must be considered to have ‘dimotions of time’ NOT of spatial information.*

PRIME, ODD AND EVEN ‘GENDER SYMMETRY’ NUMBERS.

If we extend this vital analysis of regular numbers in space to sequential numbers in time, we come up with another ternary division of all numbers within the finite limits of a given ecosystem (infinity being a paralogic Kantian error of the mind as all planes have a limit of numerical form, normally as explained in the 10-11^{10-11} range, from ties of DNA in a human gene to stars in a galaxy)… that between top predator prime numbers, which generate all other, even, social reproductive, ‘female’ numbers, the majority of them in a Universe that systematically favors ‘reproductive Si=Te’ states as all fractal generators do, over even, informative + entropic ‘male numbers’, which can be divided in a minority of ‘prime numbers’ that carry the information of reality as they can generate all other numbers in 4-Dimensional sums; and entropic, unstable forms that code no new information (odd numbers excluded primes, which generate them).

So we find yet again another fundamental division of species, according to the key variation of the ‘Fractal Generator function of space-time or 5D metric: SxT_{s=t }= C.

Indeed, it is the same duality of ‘Female’ present reproductive, ‘even’ gender, Si=Te vs. ‘male’ past to future to past, entropic and informative gender, S<T>S: SxT, the key temporal ternary symmetries of the Universe; between present dominant states, and past to future to past cycles, which requires a full comprehension of the 3 ages of time, and its ‘complex ternary logic’ sketched in the introduction, that we develop in the paper on ‘5 D time –pentalogic’.

Essentially all cyclical time systems have 3 ages, a relative entropic past of dissolution, a reproductive dominant present and an informative future. And the proportion in any system is ½ present + ½ (Past>Future ) that closes the cycle. For example, in quantum physics wave states are the present state; particles the future state and fields the past state. In matter, liquid is the present state, gas the past state and solid the future state. In cells, DNA is the future state, cytoplasm the present state and the protein membrane the energetic state. Its Si=Te symmetry makes the past less evolved, more extended in space, the present balanced, the future more informative. In human gender, the woman is the reproductive state, and males divide into a majority of entropic destructive and a minority of highly informative (complex IQ test put woman in the middle, a minority of men above a majority in the entropic lower range).

So to understand the ¡logic division of the 3 ages of time into past=entropy, S<T, which dissolves systems into a lower ¡-1 plane, present=reproduction, Si=Te, that iterates reality which seems not to change, and future=informative evolutionary system, T>S, which increase its form into the future… I refer the reader to the article on 5D pentalogic.

In terms of its scalar social organization, the 3 ‘different’ groups of T>S informative, Si=Te, energetic and S<T entropic elements of a class structure correspond to the informative class (i.e. stocrkats in our society ruled by money, politicians in a real democracy, military in a dictatorship) which controls the language of power of society, while Si=Te form the body-wave of the system that reproduces it and it is taken care by the informative particle-head, while the S<T element is the entropic class easily ‘divided’ and broken, as energy of the others, in this case the odds that can be broken in smaller factors. And as we shall see the game of numbers have a remarkable proportion of the two first classes as opposed to our ill-designed systems, a theme treated in 5D politics, where we study the informative ‘nervous’ network of human superorganisms.

While the general study of those 3 states belongs to those 2 articles, in the mathematical mirror the division is self-evident as we already observed some clear differences between odd and even numbers/polygons:

** Odd vs. Even polygons** alternate with a key different property: The diagonals of even polygons create central singularities and form more stable systems, tending to static states, ‘looking inwards’. They can reproduce by motion into equal forms in the same plane, and can easily tile, filling up the entire plane. While odd numbers penetrate in the scales of the fifth dimension by reproducing fractal mirrors of smaller size, when crossing inwards its diagonals (informative reproduction) or larger mirror images when crossing outwards its diagonals. Those properties carry through all scales of gender mirror symmetry; as 1 element is sterile, self-centered making different the 2 type of organic membrane-polygons. Since Si=Te even polygons do NOT reproduce through 5D motions as odd numbers, but within the same present plane of existence as they are ‘self-centered’ in a single point, within the polygon, NOT replicating without motion. Reproduction of even polygons happens by translation in space, as waves reproduce. So by moving through a tiling of present space a square reproduces filling the tiling, unlike a pentagon or odd polygon that reproduces internally and externally as its motion filling space is often impossible

**Prime numbers as informative systems.** In ‘vital mathematics’ as in classic maths, Prime numbers play a fundamental role in number theory because of a basic theorem:

Every integer n > 1 may be represented as product of prime numbers (with possible repetition of factors), i.e., in the form where p_{1} < p2 < . . . < p_{k} are primes and a_{1}, a_{2}, . . ., a_{k} are integers not less than one. Furthermore, the representation of any nº in this form is unique.

*This implies that Primes are the Scalar space-time numbers of all others; hence the minimal numerical system with maximal information. And inversely if we reduce entropically a system of numbers, by ‘division’ (the operand of entropic dissolution)* o*nly prime numbers or its social combination DO survive=exist in the ultimate skeleton of reality, due to its efficiency as polygonal forms. *

*Everything else is a virtual society of prime numbers; and the strongest social groups are those under 23, stuffed with primes and displaying a solid even membrane.*

**Prime numbers in time sequences: stability of systems.**

A prime number is any integer (greater than 1) that has only the 2 positive integer divisors, one and itself. 1 is not considered a prime number since it does not have 2 different positive divisors. But it was so rightly in the past –as we might consider that 1 *is the super-prime, the whole that divides all other numbers of nature. *

And the fundamental characteristic that differentiates them is that as polygonal numbers grow in sides, that is the social number of ‘points-cells’ increases the system become less stable, because *it increases the number of redundant non-prime odds (ab. odds). *And when we carry the symmetry Si=Te, to temporal sequences which as we have seen is the proper way to study numbers beyond the decametric scale, this lack of stability increases enormously past the 23 ‘years’ (we shall call points=numbers in time sequences ‘years’); which is the ‘cut’ between the young age of maximal energy and the mature age; and again plunge past the 83 number, leaving a mean of 1 primer for ‘decade’, which is indeed the standard age for death, both in human years, or in Si=Te atomic evolution (radioactive atoms past lead).

We talk then of each prime number as a key ‘age’, and 23, the PRIME age of a 100 normal system, where a transition to the mature age takes place. This we know about human life – the end of University, the beginning of work, the maximal force and energy for most athletes in the table of elements, it gives way to the family of Iron-Nickel-Cobalt which are the most entropic-energetic system, (26 iron) ending in Cobalt the first ‘radioactive’, transition element that ends the series.

Those are the themes of ‘vital mathematics’, which the synoptic mirror of numbers reflect from the configuration of social numbers in space and time, and we shall just study in a bit of more detail.

Still prime numbers are infinite and relatively abundant according to the π=n/log n rule, so huge social systems are possible both in space and time duration as complex new primes, can reinforce the structure as nodal points of stable networks. A prime number by definition is more stable as a configuration of social forms, as it *can’t split into equal parts*.

How far can we stretch this stability? In inflationary mathematics to infinity. But in scalar space-time infinity becomes increasingly unstable as prime numbers dwindle.

As the irregular infinity of *the number of entropy, e, which breaks after 10 decimals:**, (*the 1+8=9; 2+8=10 regularity disappears after 10 numbers if we consider 2.7 the first dual term of the regular pattern), loosing its structural, informative meaning’, we should consider that beyond the ± *10-11 ^{10-11} social scale between planes, gathering in 10±1 decametric scales, the systems of ‘big number theory’ are largely irrelevant. *

In any case prime numbers clearly dwindle (as per Euler’s and Riemann’s functions in the graphs) beyond the 10.000 social group, suffering a steep decline towards the 10^{11 }mark in a tail proper of an almost ‘extinct’ species. So larger primes are rarefied and very few complex structural systems beyond mere herding exist past that number:

In graph, number of primes holds remarkably dense in the basic 100 scale being 1/2th of the 10^{th} scale (if we consider 1 a prime number) and 1/4th in the 100 scale, which are the key scales that encode most stable members of timespace both in the space symmetry (table of elements) and the age symmetry (life span in years.

The ratio dwindles to 1/6th out of 1000 and 1/8th for 10.000 in the next key interval of social groups, still fairly strong, if we take into account that the 10% is a very strong ‘leading’ elite in organic class structures of any stientific scale… and organism. This 1/10^{th} informative class structure still holds in the 1 million social group (1/12th). So the Universe is strongly connected and stable in its hierarchy of prime informative numbers on top of reproductive, energy, even numbers 1/2 with the entropic, easy to break odd numbers, never a majority of the ternary class system.

Compare it with our present societies – corrupted placebo democracies ruled by money issued in near monopoly by ‘stockrats’, modern aristocrats of the capitalist society, owners of corporations, which are less than the infamous 1%, closer to a 0.01% of owners of corporations. This tiny proportion of informative class coding the language of social power doesn’t even happen for the 10^{12} limit of the most complex supœrganisms of reality as primes are still a 4%.

**The 20 ^{th}, reproductive mirror symmetry of the 10^{th} scale, & the 100^{th} time aging scales.**

It is then only worth for an introduction to Number theory to study just the 10^{th}, 20^{th} and 100^{th} scales. The first purely ‘spatial’ the second which ‘doubles’ the first in a mirror symmetry is the reproductive Si=Te scale of numbers, with the equivalent 4 prime proportion; while the 1 to 100 scale is the Temporal symmetry of ages; and as such we shall relate them in other posts as we ‘ascend’ the scales of reality and the laws easier to understand in the ‘synoptic’ languages that mirror best the Universe’s time and space, ‘¡logic’ and Non-E mathematics’ emerge with different ‘forms’ in those upper stientific scales.

We shall not do it here, for the sake of time and space, as we are still in the 1^{st} age of mathematics, with the symmetry of points and numbers. Only to notice that for the reproductive mirror scale of 20, closed by its largest prime, number, 19, its square, which doubles its dimension 19º x 19º= 361º gives us the commonest ‘closure’ of a sphere in space (360 being the scale of degrees) and time (365 being the days on a year)…

And so we have another curious number 361º ‘degrees’ for the perception of angular rotation, *(as we know geometry is always approached in its figure by discrete number above or below ±1), which suggest the natural limit for a discrete polygon of cyclical nature.*

*The vital nature of the *10 to 20 scale as a mirror of the 10D basic scaling for reproductive purposes, emerges as usual with small variations in more complex stientific scales. So it shows in the game of life, where 20 are the number of amino acids that construct most organisms and your body can not live without; … as they generate everything else in the upper scales. Even in the most ‘distant’ level of human languages, the 20 scale manifest itself; so most alphabets have 20 some symbols to write the language; which then generate a larger number of phonemes broken in vowels of information and energetic consonants (more abundant. I.e. the English alphabet has 26 letters, split in a total of 20 vowels and 24 consonants.

**RECAP**. The first prime numbers are: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29… And so while the decametric and 10-20 scale are buttressed with 4 of them each, almost 1/2, which *explains further why they are really the 20 numbers that matter in almost every system of reality, being the 10 to 20 the mirror symmetry of the 10 scale; which you might extend to the 23 range… beyond those ‘efficient numbers’ systems diminish in stability.*

So in the table of elements, where the strength of the system is a mixture of its ‘even configuration in 2 and 4 pairs’ and odd volume of inner layers, the range around 22-26 (iron) give us the strongest top predator atoms of maximal energy, which is the role of a polygon number that closes as the membrane of vital energy any T.œ. system in nature.

Yet if we consider the temporal sequence the same series, breaks the first age of life, which in a biological human being ends at 24 years: 1-24: youth, 24-48: maturity, 48-72: 3rd age; 72-80 death. And indeed prime numbers plummet after 83. So this will be indeed the fundamental scaling for all timespace life-death symmetries (as we shall show for each stience, from the amino acid series to the life cycles, from the atomic table to the cycles of historic and economics which fit within those decametric 5D scales).

**S<>****T Dimotions: Numbers as Universal Constants**

As Einstein wanted the ultimate principles of reality are Universal ratios/constants, which represent the 5 dimotions of all Universal systems*. So we shall find 4+1* absolute constant ratios in all systems, *of Nature, of the vital Universe: e pi, e, 10=3×3+1 and phi. What about locomotion? In 5D physics locomotion is reproduction of form, from particle to wave state to particle. So it has not a fundamental constant but a mixture of the informative, reproductive ones, pi and phi.* *5D thus use those 5 constants to explain how the Universe reproduces reality departing from those ‘perfect ratios of energy and information’. * 3 are irrational≈ratio numbers that represent the 3 ages of all worldcycles of exist¡ence:

10 is the seminal social number of palingenetic ∆-1 emergence, π, is the number of the worldcycle, of the 1st Dimotion of perception; phi is the number of the 3rd Dimotion of reproduction, in the second ‘age’ or maturity of the world cycle, and e is the number of decay and entropy, of the fifth Dimotion of existence.

* *

*1D: Pi transforms a temporal field of entropy into a vortex of spatial information: 3D ($T) > ∏ ðƒ.*

Its obvious nature is immediate, as we perceive through angular trigonometry, when pi closes a circle of 3 Diameters, with 4%=π-3/π of perceptive holes through which 3 sensorial apertures to the Universe happen and 96% of dark matter hidden by the membrane (which not coincidentally is the part of the Universe hidden by the galactic halo we don’t see).

**3D: Phi is the ratio of reproduction in time,** approached by Fibonacci series in gender S≈T couples, which reproduce in the 2nd age of maturity, and die after the 3^{rd} age. So for ‘2 consecutive quanta of time’, the young still won’t reproduce, the old won’t be still dead and the mature will reproduce giving the series 1,1,2,3,5… that approaches the phi ratio. The golden spiral then becomes the natural ‘time-series’ for filling a surface of energy where to growth in a frequency of space-time generations, given by the ratio – even if the ‘interior of the spiral’, fades away as generations die behind us, leaving a void. Its inverted implosive ‘symmetry’ as informative growth (T>S), gives a proportion for the reproduction of complex information, (as in finger proportions, when form overcomes size). Thus the golden ratio is the most efficient form of inner growth and proportion, keeping the balance and distribution of information in a system.

**2D: It combines with pi to gives the locomotion number,** as motion is reproduction of a pi cycle of information along an adjacent series of forms. We saw the case for a cyclical reproductive spiral, and in the 3rd graph we see the case for a lineal reproductive series, which becomes real in quantum particle-waves.

**4D: 10 is the scale** of social evolution or 4 Dimotion of scales, which is the main series of all numbers.

**5D: Finally the exponential function**, is the most efficient form of social growth between scales of the fifth dimension. In the graph, we can see how the growth of any system in base e is the maximal possible. But such exponential 4D social growth can only happen in a placental unlimited world of free energy. So its true use is for the inverse arrow of death and decay, when it is the maximal speed at which the cells that grew in the placental ∆+1 palingenetic first age, now die in the final ∆-¡ age of entropic decay, adding together to a 0-sum.

So e is the exponential function that grows faster: *e ^{x} is the only function, which is a derivative of itself*, adding constantly a 1/n finitesimal derivative ‘cell’, in each time step, but also decaying in the fastest possible path of dying quanta

*. e*

^{x}represents the fundamental function of reproduction of any system in its 1^{st}world cycle of a perfect energy placenta, þ, at the lower ‘cellular scale’, as the system increases by a derivative at each step.**Algebra: the 5 Dimotions as operands.**

Operands express 5 Ðimotions of Time§pace supœrganisms; whereas ∫∂ is the most versatile for both the analysis of Dimotions=change & scales (finitesimal derivatives & integral wholes) hence the most fruitful in mathematical physics.

While the negative inverse operands represent the destructive entropic 5th dimotion that affects all others. So negative/inverse operand balance positive ones, restoring the zero-sum balances of all Si=Te, events and systems of reality. Thus:

**1D:@:** The operand of the 1^{st} Dimotion of perception of a self-centered in the point are sine/cosine trigonometric functions, which allow to measure the 3 ∆st parameters distance=motion in spacetime (Si=Te) and angle *the scalar Dimensionless factor.*

* *

*As π is irrational it never fits becoming a spiral closing & opening its mouth in S≈Tates of ‘entropic expansion and implosive in-form-ation’. While a π made of 3 Diameters :**leaves a π-3d/π, 4% of ‘openings’ to see outer space’, leaving a 96% of not perceivable dark space, hidden by the membrane – the amount of the cosmos our electronic eyes cannot see beyond the galaxy, closed by its dark matter halo. *

**2D: Lineal Locomotion. ± operands***.* A lineal motion is a sum of frequency steps moving in the positive direction, or a negative number, moving in the inverse direction. Thus unlike *spatial populations of* **N, Natural Numbers, Z** *adds temporal negative numbers which are inverse dimensions that close a worldcycle of simple locomotion. *Negative inverse Dimotions thus can be expressed also in the duality of expansive entropic vs. implosive informative warping in more complex formalisms of Locomotion, as in Minkowski’s space where time, -ct has a negative, i-number that ‘warps’ lineal space into a wave of high information, shortening the distance: D^{2}= S(x+y+z)^{2} –(ct)^{2}.

**3D: X, ÷, reproduction & social evolution vs. entropic division. **2D: In pentalogic, the product acts an operand of a sum of sums which can account for a ‘long period of locomotion’: S=vt.

3D: Its new function is reproduction, carried in 2 scales; as in the Function of existence, Max. SxT (s=t), which merges two different parameters, maximizing its *connections on the lower level of its organic parts. As the product means then the number of ‘axions’ connecting them, which is maximized when the parts of both ‘sets’ are equal. *So, if we have 2 points with 4 internal sub-elements, the product 4 x 4 will give us the number of maximal connections, when we put each internal element in connection with all the elements of the other sub-set, which will be larger than between a 5 & 3 elements. Thus ‘gender’ reproduction requires similar forms.

4D: As a sum of numbers that are social groups it can represent also a scalar social evolution. So its inverse, division and Q-numbers are entropic numbers breaking of wholes into parts, as *the 5 number families also represent the 5 Dimotions.*

**4D-5D:** **log a, xª: social evolution in decametric scales and entropy decay in negative exponentials.**

The 10^{10} decametric scale is the social scale of the Universe, as the Tetraktys is the simplest, perfect social system, with 3×3 physiological networks, and a 10^{th} element, the ‘black ball’ communicating them as the ‘single Unit’ of the larger whole – from armies of 10 x 10 captains, to 10^{10 }ties in DNAs, stars in galaxies, galaxies in Universe. Powers of 10 as Eames’ movie show thus create new wholes. While a negative exponential shows the rhythm of decay of the system in the fastest event of reality, death, maximized by the e-function, which we just showed to be the fastest negative growth.

So **Real Numbers **are scalar ratio numbers, which as e decay a whole into scales, or as π allow mental perception, shrinking a whole into a mental mapping with no limit of ‘warping’ (Poincare Conjecture). Together,* the logarithmic part of growth and its inverse function of decay shape a ‘life-death cycle’ in term of social growth of energy ∆-1 cells and dissolution forming the two sides of an inverse worldcycle peaking in the Max. SxT (s=t) middle point. *

**4-5D: ∫∂: **The closure of 5D¡-operands & 5 number families are derivatives of finitesimal 1/n parts that measure a quanta of change in time, space or scale, and its inverse integral of wholes. While the squared **Complex plane** shows* dual* ST beings as Cx. numbers with a Real 2D area of S-populations & a negative 1D T-frequency of emerging i-motions. Its pentalogic is:

**ð:** As inverse, temporal numbers or negative numbers of an inverse direction of motion.

**$:** As 2D real numbers (Bolay) with its own rules of multiplication (a,b) x (c,d) = (ac-bd; ad+bc)

≈ As a relation between Space quantities represented in the real line to and ‘Time’ ones in the imaginary line.

**@:** As a self-centered polar frame of reference (r, α).

**∆:** Cx^{2} is its ∆§-frame of reference apt to study S>T complementary functions of bodywave>Particlehead T.œs; so in quantum physics is the real particle>imaginary quantum potential field of Bohm’s solution

**RECAP.** 5D match those operandi non-E geometry to the laws of ∆ST. Mathematics studies how Si=Te waves of reproductive motion creates new organic forms, which can be studied topologically or algebraically as the production o f a new dimension is a product function of algebraic thought. All other operands come from either an angular measure (5^{D}or scalar measure), a product or related ±√º, or an ∫∂ operandi.

In a Universe made of space-time beings, Mathematics is the experimental stience of vital, scalar Space (made of points and scalar numbers). Maths main 2 subfields ARE S@-Geometry & ∆T-Algebra. Nº theory & geometry show mathematics as a logic mirror of the Universe’s pentalogic scalar structure made with scalar numbers, Non-E fractal points with inner dimensions and timespace S<≈>T operands that reflect the dynamic symmetries & stœps of its 5 spacetime dimotions. Ænthropic men instead justify math with an ego-trip of digital creationism: Only he & God speak the language, math, that creates reality -not the other way around, and try to prove its truths with an incomplete (Gödel) axiomatic method, as an ideal, perfect absolute ‘truth’ with NO correspondence with reality (sets as ‘imagined’ units of math). We shall do the opposite: departing from reality we construct a vital improved mirror of maths, where even the perceived irregularities of mathematics are experimental true symmetries of a vital dynamic Universe: i.e. irrational numbers are required NOT to close a vital pi-cycle and √2 triangle to allow openings into its lower decimal scales to absorb energy and information. So we shouldn’t force ‘idealist continuity’ in a discontinuous Universe. i.e. 3 topologic geometries with motion suffice to mirror the 3 St, sT, ST combinations of an organism because we ARE spacetime’. i.e. numbers are indistinguishable social groups (polytopes) because 5D is ‘social’; its Prime, T>S + odd, S<T male numbers vs. Even female s=t numbers are the 1st digital reproductive mirror symmetry, because the Universe is reproductive. Calculus is all pervading because it studies the Spacetime dimotions mirrored by 5 operands, 5 number families, 5 geometric postulates, etc. Topologic proofs of algebraic functions are possible because of S-form=T-motion symmetry.

So we evolve both formal sciences from its Euclidean ‘continuous’ single space view of ‘points without parts’ into a full Non-Euclidean fractal system of discontinuous points that create waves instead of lines, which evolve into networks and topological planes=organisms; as we are all made of vital mathematical spaces’ and we shall evolve, the simple unicasual Aristotelian logic, of a single lineal A->B time arrow, into the higher pentalogic of the Universe made of 5 Dimensional motions of space-time (ab. Dimotions), entangled to create reality. 5D mathematics thus ads to the axiomatic method an experimental view of the discipline as a mirror language of the 5Dimotions of space-time that create all the systems of the Universe, and mathematics reflects from multiple perspectives (sub-disciplines, operands, geometric postulates, pentalogic use of 5 elements, families of Nº.)

Further more because 5D metric (SxT=K) implies that smaller systems (Min. S) have paradoxically more information (Max. T), as ‘seeds’ that develop its synoptic form through the immanent program of reality, the enormous synoptic power of mathematical elements, social, scalar numbers and operand makes it the main language of the smallest Timespace beings – particles and atoms, which likely create their local order through ‘Existential algebra’, the vital mathematical interpretation provided by 5D. Its 5 main sub disciplines are based in a pentalogic, slightly different view of the 5 Dimotions of reality: Geometry and its 5D Non-Euclidean fractal points of space; Algebra and its 5 operands expressing each of the 5 Dimotions of time; Number theory and its 5D families of scalar social numbers; self centered in the 5 D main frames of reference of bidimensional space, also corresponding with the 5 Dimotions (2D lineal=cylindrical, 5D Cartesian=flat, entropic, 1D Polar; 3D vectorial and 4D, complex planes), negated by 5D entropic inverse operands. Thus both reality and its mathematical mirrors are constructed with the 5 dimotions of ¬∆@st , dust of space-time, the substance of which we are all made. Because mirrors are fractal synoptic images of the whole, mathematics also has an internal consistency described by the axiomatic method, but the advance provided by 5 D mathematics is that now we know where the laws of mathematics come from, as a mirror of Scalar time space systems.

**Negative numbers as ****Time numbers. Lorentz transformations.** **Roots in space**** and imaginary numbers.**

An important fact, we find in inverted operations, is that its ‘number of solutions’ and real forms its numbers and attached operands describe IS *smaller* than the number of solutions to the positive operand, which clearly points out once more to the ‘positive’ arrow of life and information in the Universe, outgaining the negative arrow, unlike in humind’s delirious entropy-only theories of reality. So while there are squares for all natural numbers, there are not roots for all numbers but only positive ones; neither there are derivatives for negative squares including the root of 0 ,∂√0… Even negative numbers are not defined in the sum of spatial populations – there is not a spatial negative apple, but only a negative time number. Which is a key concept for mathematical physics, as we must often *consider the negative number an operand, for functions where the number defines a time motion, hence an inverse direction, which can therefore be taken out of the root to calculate the root of the ‘scalar’ number and then apply the inverse direction. *

What negative solutions mean to those equations? Euler’s vision of negative numbers as inverse time numbers is its proper meaning. *So they do exist, which has clear consequences in areas such as relativity where negative mass, means only an entropic process of expansion of mass into entropy. *

*Here also is important to understand dynamically the operand = as an ≤=≥ transformation.*

*I.e:* E=Mc ^{2} does not mean energy (really entropy in this case), is mass, as mass is in the other ‘inverse side’ of the equation. So the real equality happens when m moves to the same side of E: e <=> -mc².

*Further on as we have defined a mass as an accelerated vortex of time, it is a time process;* hence the – can be taken out, once it is clear it defines an uncoiling accelerated inverse mass expansion, exactly the definition of dark entropy/energy of vacuum space, which is ejected at faster than c-speed according to those equations on the axis of black holes with less information than c, hence invisible and perceived as expanding space:

So negative numbers are mostly time functions, as a negative spatial population of ‘apples’ makes no sense.

Which defines negative mass as an expansive entropic destruction of mass. And so in relativity the 2 solutions, which can be put as an example of the 2 roots of quadratic equations (one discharged in processes that are social and accumulative).

Alas, because mass is an accelerated vortex of gravitational forces, as mass increases, the vortex accelerates inwards, as all vortices do, (Ro x Vo = C, for the simplest bidimensional one), which means its ‘radius’ diminishes in the direction of lineal locomotion, and so as mass increases the x-component decreases (Lorentz contraction), till the inner-outer Si=Te unbalance between the T-length-motion component and S-height component of the particle-wave ‘explodes’=breaks the system which cannot longer perform its Stœp, stop-particle, step-motion ‘beat’; thus the particle state no longer happens and the particle becomes a mere flow of radiation and dark entropy. Simple, realistic, correct way to explain the apparent inverse duality of mass and length… At which point lineal time-duration, T=0; that is, as all equations of death, T=0, Max. S; the particle becomes transformed into something else – an entropic expansion of spatial information. In terms of ‘time duration’, as we observe particles to live longer closer to c-speed; since 5D metrics considers one of its sub-functions, ð=k for entire families of species (sorry not immortality here, the beats of the heart of a mouse, a man and an elephant are the same); it must be then obvious that *those beats of particles last longer; that is, for an external observer take longer to trace, but for the internal particle clock which perceives psychological time in terms of its ‘closed beats’, each beat a ‘thought’ so to speak, there is no difference. *

In graph, faster-than-light travel and negative mass are the same (ß=v^{2}/c^{2}). We define negative mass as an expansive entropic destruction of mass. How to interpret that equation on our analysis of ‘Existential ¬Ælgebra’ regarding the meaning of roots is then evident: closer to c-speed, the barrier between the light space-time and the intergalactic space-time made of ‘something else’ (likely a background of faster than light neutrinos, as 5D is experimental and so particles not detected are not in the books of any theory till they are – so dark matter is quark matter, dark entropy, neutrinos, and IF a new exotic particle is found beyond fancy mathematical writing we shall revise the known-known economicity laws of physics).

**The efficient Universe.**

Power laws, its inverse function, roots, and exponentials and its inverse negative exponential functions, form together a ‘family of operands’ which keep increasing the complexity of our analysis, and the inflationary number of ‘entropic solutions’ – that is solutions that are not stable, efficient and do not happen beyond virtual minds of mathematical thought. What this means in praxis is that when we increase the results and combinations of a syntactic language, its real semantics are reduced. I.e. there are ∞ entropic combinations of the 27 letters of the alphabet, but nobody in his ‘right mind’ would dedicate his life as some mathematicians and physicists do to explore the meanings of xhtwertwegwrg, fwerwgwrh, adgaghe and any fast-writing keyboard combination with NO relationship to reality, if the rules of syntax and the constrains of experimental semantics are understood, the difference between potential and actual infinity (Aristotle) are grasped. All this the imaginary idealist German school of Cantor and Hilbert got away with it. So now mathematical physics is hard at studying the 10^{500} landscapes of string theory (: While some computer programmers are hard at finding the trillionth π decimal without understanding truly what π and the sphere is.

I like specially the work of Greene on ahgrtarhst strings and that of the Cray computer on the 37564567 series of π, LOL. Which is a good introductory quip to 5D physics… given the sense of self-importance human physicists have about themselves as the ‘authorized’ tribal idols and ‘seers of time’ (Augustine’s definition of God), since their models of the whole are so grossly overrated we’ll need a bit of humor to deal with such egocy.* Fact is physics as today only recognizes mathematical properties and so it needs 5D ¬Ælgebra to undertand its errors and correct them to make a better mirror, plus add 5D organic, sentient properties to matter; which is like everything else a fractal organism of 5 Dimotions=forces of spacetime.*

**NON-Æ TOPOLOGY**

**Topological spaces** **Topology as the queen of mathematical sciences.**

Topology is Geometry with motion, hence the temporal 3rd age of Geometry and its culmination, as expression of the real morphology of space-time beings, which includes its 3 main elements: ∆-scales (topological forms are defined in modern terms as networks of points); Space forms (its 3 varieties are the 3 organs/forms/functions of all T.œs) and its time-motions (a topological organ by definition can morph and evolve but remains the same as long as it does not ‘break’ its topological characteristics). So topology *instantly connects with 5D metric laws*, in its 3 ages:

**1st age:** Classic topology. **2nd age:** Fractal mathematics & networks. **3rd age:** Vital topology (∆ST Supœrganisms).

So after showing how fractal points joined by networks become waves =flows of energy and information that evolve into topological organisms with 3 physiological networks, the Spatial, entropic, ‘digestive’ system, the S≈t, reproductive ‘blood network’ and the ðƒ-Informative brain network, messed together through its ‘dark spaces’ (as networks do have holes) forming the supœrganisms of the Universe; *we will see the same process through topologic varieties connecting its classic themes (1 ^{st} age) with its 3^{rd} age (∆ST vital topology).*

**Ternary topological varieties: Vital, Organic Geometry merges formal, physical and biological stiences.**

The 5 Postulates of ¬E geometry have an immediate consequence in the transformation of all ‘entities of mathematical geometry’ into topologic, bidimensional varieties, as a system to exist will have a dimension of time and a motion of space, which are equivalent Si=Te, in its ideal value (though normally the motion of time as it does not reproduce in persistent forms will reach a fractal dimension).

And the true task of 5D Geometry will be to relate all those dimensions and motions to its ‘functions’ connecting them in real events and forms to the 1 to 5 Dimotions of existence.

Single Euclidean dimensions are useful when the T.œ is perceived as a fractal point of a larger world and we reduce its internal dimensions. So we talk of:

**External 1-dimensions:** The 3 varieties of Euclidean simplified dimensions are: height-informative dimension (1D), width-reproductive dimension (3D) and length-locomotion (2D). So we can write a simple generator:

$T(length: locomotion)<ST-width: reproduction>§ð (height: information)

It is those kinds of entanglements between pure formal geometries and vital organic functions what closes the gap between reality and mathematics through the vital topology in 1, 2 or 3 D Dimotions. Only that often one of the dimensions of study will be a motion in time, but by virtue of Si=Te, could also be in many cases studied as a still space dimension. So we can find then equivalences and symmetries between geometric forms and the SS (4D seed and social evolution), St (information), ST (energy of reproduction), sT (locomotion), TT entropy) 5 dimotions that combine the poles of form-space and time-motion of the Universe

**Internal topologic bidimensions:**

In the graph the bidimensional topologies form also a fractal generator of T.œs:

SS-St(spheric seeds and minds)<ST-hyperbolic body-waves>sT-TT: lineal, flat locomotion and entropy.

Whereas SS and TT imply a formation or dissolution of networks across ∆±¡ scales.

Those surfaces in Lobachevski’s expression, are “dissections” of space: Each of them divides the space into two domains, an interior and an exterior, and they are the common boundary of these two domains. This fact is connected with another, namely that every one of our surfaces has two sides: an interior and an exterior (one side can be painted in one color, and the other in another).

Thus the first task of any membrane in the process of generation of a T.œ, is to break space-time into inner and outer regions, where the informative and entropic arrows of the system will develop a complex, rich in information, internal T.œ inwards and an outer entropic membrane to detail with its anti-world from where to obtain motion and energy captured by the hard membrane to reproduce into more ∆-1 cellular/atomic components and grow. It is then clear that:

‘The purpose of topology is to study the ternary vital geometries of T.œ, its functions and transformations’

Whereas the ternary bidimensional only topologies of 4-5D space thus also explain the ternary nature of all physiological networks and its vital functions for any s, st, t organism.

It holds then that each organ, variety of vital topology MUST not TEAR and CHANGE its external form beyond deformation not to loose its properties. Those 3 bidimensional topological varieties then have motion related to internal changes of in-form-ation not to external, lineal changes of locomotion.

And its complexity grows as we perceive them in more detail. As time is cyclical, made of 3’π’ lineal time motions, we shall distinguish 3 conserved ‘quantities’ of timespace that put together create superorganisms, a relative devolving past or arrow of entropy represented in physics by disordered explosions in space and in vital topology by lineal limbs/fields of lineal momentum, an iterative reproductive present that seems not to change, represented by hyperbolic body/waves of energy, and an implosive in-form-ative local future arrow represented in physic by accelerated, V(t)R(s)=K vortices and angular momentum, and by particle/heads in the ensembles of vital topology.

So timespace breaks in ∞ relative local, fractal entropic pasts, iterative energy presents and informative futures, which put together create the illusion of a single timespace continuum.

**Generator Function. The 3 organic topological ST-planes. ****Physical dimotions.**

3 bidimensional topologic planes become 3 organs in any of the infinite fractal systems of the Universe:

$T(Toroid field/limb)<Te=Si (Hyperbolic wave/body)>§ð (spherical head/particle)

The simplest forms are those of still Greek Geometry and physical systems, which range from pure still geometries: SS (space areas, closed conic orbitals, of maximal space-form and minimal time-change), through all variations of ST dimotions proper to TT (accelerated time dimotions, of maximal time-speed and diminishing spatial volume, as in charge and mass vortices), which *become doors to a new scale of* the 5^{th} dimension.

‘

Thus between the extreme dual arrows of entropy (TT) and pure seed-form (its inverse SS state) both combine into conservative ‘present’ zero-sum cycles of energy body-waves, limbs/fields of locomotion and particle-heads of information. They are the 3 ‘conserved’ arrows of time that create the futures of each fractal supœrganism.

So in a single 5D plane all systems are made of those 3 Ðimotions, which become organic §urfaces perceived simultaneously in space ensemble into vital systems; act in Space-Time and live an accelerated/steady state/decelerated 3 ages TT worldcycle of existence observed only as a time process.

And vital topology studies them, between its 4Dimotion of generation in a lower ∆-1 plane that emerges in an ∆+1 social world to die back in a dissolving explosion of scattering entropy, back to ∆-1 in the moment of death, which topology also can analyze them as process of creation and dissolution of networks.

**The fifth dimension is occupied by fractal branching networks; each of its planes by 3 topological varieties.**

So there is also a fundamental duality between dimotions in a single plane (the 3 varieties of topology) and the perpendicular structure of the fifth dimension as a branching network, which connects the larger whole and its smaller, multiple parts. I.e. Your whole, the brain and heart branches down to its parts. 5^{th} dimotional changes of scales thus imply some network branching, which apparently is different in a big-bang explosion of a physical system in parts and an ordered distribution of blood or nervous impulses, but geometrically are equivalent, ∆º<∑∆-1 motions in the 5^{th} Dimension which in terms of its metric expands in space and hence diminish in time the speed of the motion (deceleration of a big-bang from its initial impulse; deceleration of the speed of blood through ever more extended networks of tinier vessels).

We thus translate in those analysis by virtue of the disomorphic=equal laws of all scales, the vital fact we ARE made of space-time and the duality of Si=Te analysis topology into the pentalogic dimotions of existential algebra (¬Æ): when studied as still dimensions of space it leads to an i-logic topology of fractal points with parts that entangle to display the scalar, fractal, network complexity of Universal supœrganisms.

*The 2 varieties of the 2 ^{nd} and 3^{rd} postulates.*

The postulates of ¬E therefore ‘diverge’ in its own variations depending on what process we study, a travel through a single plane or through several planes of the fifth dimensions, departing from two initial fractal points living in a single plane, or a larger point and its micro-parts. So do *the algebraic operands we use*:

In a single plane, we study aggregations on herds of fractal points as lineal waves, and use the ‘sum operand’ (superposition principle). While between scales, we use the ‘product operand’ and we see fractal lines and networks.

And this differentiation carries to the 3^{rd} postulate as 3 networks of points and parts, become topological organic planes, which complete the mirror symmetry of 5D geometry with the superorganisms of reality as they are.

It kicks then the 4^{th} postulate of relative congruence to define as a positive social evolution of networks into organisms or an entropic, scattering dissolution of wholes into parts, *so congruence becomes essential to establish what geometry often cannot differentiate without detailed view or motion analysis: if what we observe is a big-bang death (max. speed) or a network construction.*

In the other case, the simpler sum of waves (no longer lines), in a single plane, also requires an analysis of the congruence angle, to know if waves will cancel each other or add up.

So we upgrade still spatial mathematics with its 5 ¬Æ postulates that substitute the classic axioms, postulates and principles of E geometry well beyond what the 5 Non-E postulate merely hinted at in the XX c.

Yet abstract still Greek geometry still works as a mirror of reality, when we reduce it to a single plane. Then points are a ‘dominant’ spatial, mental view which reside in a single plane and the ‘mind’ perceives in stillness, with no internal scalar form and continuity when associated into lines, planes and volumes; even though in a deeper reality they have ‘fractal content’. E- mathematicians though missed the ‘self-awareness’ of that simplification, now evident with the 5 postulates of ilogic Geometry that describe how points become parts of social webs, self-organizing fractal planes made of networks of points that emerge as cellular units of a higher fractal space-time or new supœrganism. And so we define ¬E topology as the study of the structures built departing from fractal points with inner parts and scalar content.

Whereas by the principle of Correspondence Classic geometry that considers points to have no breath, no inner parts is the limit of ¬E topology when we ‘eliminate’ the 5th dimension of entropic motion and the 4th dimension of fractal scales (only fractal geometry includes it in its restricted analysis). Thus 5D unify all those different geometries to make them describe parts of the same fundamental structure of the Universe: the fractal point and its more complex social forms, networks and waves and organic planes.

‘Dimensions’ are NO longer exact in number, but mostly Hausdorf dimensions for 2 reasons:

-Time motions have less ‘density’ than spatial distances, as the motion often ‘erases’ the previous information as the form slides. So while a still point has a clear ‘1 Dimension’ (by convention points have volume hence 1D), a point in motion will have less than 2 Dimensions of still space, as its motion erases its previous steps.

-Networks that peer between two scales also do NOT fill the entire lower plane and so they have a Hausdorf dimension. The way to measure them is as an ‘open ball’ that do not include the larger whole or central singularity and the tinier parts, but merely the network, which will then be also between 1 an 2 dimensions.

Themes those of a more advanced course on 5D mathematics not treated in this introductory paper, where it matters more the conceptual comprehension of the connections between vital topology and the organisms of reality, to make clear that an evolved Non-E mathematics is the organic geometry of the fractal Universe, complemented by existential algebra, and its ¡logic functions of the fractal generator of the Universe which all languages mirror in its 3±¡ pentalogic syntax, since all minds gauge and represent the cycles of the Universe with different languages of perception.

**Ssymmetric properties: function=form. Inverse properties S vs. T merged in ST-body waves.**

We noticed also a correspondence between the 5 objective Dimotions, the 3±¡ subjective frame of reference/perception, as well as the 3±¡ formal variations of topology just described.

They all come together in symbiosis as each topology and corresponding frame of reference (polar=sphere; cylindrical=lineal; hyperbolic=Cartesian; complex=scalar) has vital organic properties that best suits each dimotion of existence. Let us explore this concept closely related to symmetry.

Symmetry is the central concept of Group theory, the ice in the cake of the whole structure of Algebra.

To define it group theory uses the Paradox of Galileo: S (form in space) = Time (motion). As it does differential geometry based in the concept that a line is a point in motion.

Similarly by symmetry we mean in 5Ð Algebra, *the capacity of all systems to complete a zero sum world cycle, through a motion that returns the system to a present undistinguishable equivalent state.*

Symmetry thus is essential to the 5D immortal universe, which is a dynamic present view in perpetual motion *even though due to dynamic motion=symmetry and conservation principles derived from it*, is eternal in its returns.

We use the classic concept of symmetry as a recurrent motion that conserves the form of the being (different from our multiple worlds, symmetric, bisymmetric, asymmetric etc. used in the 4^{th} Postulate of Congruence).

It follows that the more symmetric a system is, the more efficient will be in ‘preserving’ its present states of ‘survival’ in a universe in perpetual motion. I.e. A circle will be more efficient, because it has infinite degrees of rotational symmetry that an irregular polygon that might not even have a single symmetry state.

In the theory of ‘survival’ of ‘vital mathematical objects’, which we bring from time to time to those pages (as in the analysis of survival prime numbers able to travel through 5d by making mirror images at scale by joining internally its alternate vortices-points-unit numbers), symmetry thus plays a central role.

How many states of present a system has, defines then its ‘quality of symmetry’ and survival which in space (the easiest symmetries to describe), when fixed in a point means the circle dominates all other forms as the most symmetric form.

Symmetry then becomes a requirement to perform well certain Ðimotions as vital actions:

I.e. the circle is the perfect symmetry for still Dimotions of perception, for 2 reasons:

As we perceive in stillness, it maximizes survival by having a minimal perimeter, for a maximal volume of information and disguises itself in an external Darwinian world.

Its infinite symmetry, focus all lines of communication that fall into the fractal point with minimal distortion.

However, when we consider the 2nd Dimotion of Locomotion, which is the process of displacement in space while retaining the form in time without entropic scattering, the system will maximize its speed of reproduction of form, of information in other adjacent region of space when less information displaces. And so the line, which stores no internal information (or the wave as all points are ultimately fractal with a minimum volume), will be able to displace faster than the sphere, and maximize the second Dimotion by reproducing less information. Further on, the line is the shortest distance between two points. And so locomotions are maximized both in a single plane by a lineal wave, or between 5D planes by a fractal line.

Finally hyperbolic forms mix both, lines and curves, so they can reproduce both. And a hyperbolic plane breaks down a whole into smaller fractal equal parts, thus it is the essence of reproduction.

Vital geometry thus will be essential to explain the relationships between stable forms of geometry and Nature.

*So symmetry means Survival in space; Closure of worldcycles in temporal energy. And *the pentalogic of symmetry is immediate:

**¬T:** Time symmetry is* the capacity of all systems to complete a 0-sum world cycle through a motion that returns the system to a present undistinguishable dynamic state. Hence symmetry is conservation of Time by iteration of the same ST-event, even if the previous event becomes extinguished.*

**S@:** Symmetry in space means survival, through the ‘inverse complementary entanglement’ of the parts of the being, ruled by the laws of congruence (and hence often an asymmetric adjacent system). A particular symmetry that coincides with the common-sense concept though also applies as it enhances 1D perception without deformation of a larger outer world: symmetry as repetitive regularity. It follows immediately that *the more symmetric a system is,* the more efficient will be in ‘preserving’ in a Universe in perpetual motion, its present states of ‘survival’. I.e. A circle will be more efficient, because it has infinite degrees of rotational symmetry that an irregular polygon, which might not even have a single symmetry state.

**∆… **Survival implies reproduction of form, which happens through a shrinking in 5D seeds and enlarging. So symmetry in scales means the capacity to replicate seeds that are self-similar to the whole. The ‘survival’ of ‘vital mathematical objects’, thus favors reproductive prime numbers able to shrink through 5D mirror images at scale made by joining internally its alternate vortices-points-unit numbers.

**Si=Te. **Mirror symmetry allows the reproduction of form and we dedicate an entire paper on gender to it.

*Symmetry is so important that all motions on physics and geometry can be reduced to those 3 symmetries called boosts, rotations and mirror symmetries* as defined by Noether’s theorem of physics.

Then according to form=function, Nature ensembles a lineal body-limb moving-translating in space with a spherical head, to perceive on the forward ‘future’ position smaller in size, faster in time, in adjacent relationship to the body and limbs that have lineal forms to maximize the whole’s motion.

Of all those symmetries though the most important is a 5D scalar symmetry ignored in science: the ‘undistinguishable’ property of the ¡-1 elements in which the system imprints its form, which become ‘numbers’ from the perspective of the whole. This symmetry of scale, implies that the system can reproduce its information – move faster, because it imprints ‘any element’ of the lower plane of motion or ‘field’ that becomes undistinguishable, so there are not ‘impurities’ and errors of reproduction of form, when any electron can reproduce your atomic connections and so on.

Identical parts then acquire the same larger form accomplishing the most important of the five vital dimotions of existence: reproduction.

*Thus we can establish a correspondence between dimotions and *the survival of certain geometric forms above all others: the circle/sphere for 1D perception; the line and its curved form the parabola for 2D¡ motion, its combined wave for 3D reproduction, the social undistinguishable numbers of polygons for 4D social evolution, and the different forms of open curves, notably dual, split hyperbolas for 5D entropic Dimotion and dissolution of a system in its opposite forms, which in the conic representation of a worldline, studied latter in more detail, will split, one hyperbola branch going upwards and the other downwards, and information and motion split in death, when we take the axis of the cone as the ideal representation of the fifth dimension.

**RECAP.** Each of the 3 organs domains of a space-time organism corresponds to one of the 3 fundamental topologies of a 2-3-4D manifold, the planar/toroid, cylindrical≈hyperbolic waves/bodies and spherical particles/heads, and to one of the 3 fundamental 0-points of perception, showing how close mathematics is to reality.** **

The reasons why the sphere or circle are the best forms for the first Dimotion of informative gauging, aka perception and the fourth dimotion of social evolution and seeding (mental polar frame of reference and storage of information) is the fact that the sphere has minimal surface to store maximal information as a seed not to be noticed and perfect symmetry allowing perception from all points of view without distortion.

**Genus and holes. Measuring functions with forms. 3D systems and its $<st>ð roles.**

The topologic genus of a system is the quantity of cuts/tears the system can endure without breaking the form in its component parts (5D travel) or transform it into other of the 3 varieties.

Thus genus is related to the survival properties of an organic function, as it was the case of the ‘form’ of a topology best suit to survival. And it also has 2 ‘variations’ of outcome – to break the system into parts (4, 5D) or to transform it into a different variety, which explains why often cuts do happen in morphogenesis, to evolve the shape of organs.

Further on the *genus of each variety*, grows as we grow in dimensional and informative/formal complexity, improving our survival. So the form with minimal genus that is, whose number of dissections is minimal, must be the simplest, weaker form-function, which as information is more fragile, will be the ‘hiding’ sphere of minimal perimeter, and often maximal resistance of its ‘cells’ of the hard membrane that isolates it.

So spheres tend to be harder to protect the inner information with ‘thick skulls. Since *when a topologic form is cut, it ‘dies’ literally, in the world of topological vital beings. *

*And this extends to the whole ‘adjacent’ organic parts of the being, often re-covered by a spherical membrane without holes. So topologic killing requires to tear the membrane that isolates the system, and best, to section the vital connection between its two ‘dominant’ organs, the O-head/particle and Ø=body-wave (as limbs/fields often are entropic, external, and can be lost and replaced).*

Indeed in biology where the laws of vital geometry are more self-evident all predators have the same form of killing, they cut the ‘shortest’ part of the membrane, the neck, split the O-head and the Ø-body and the thing is done with.

A key law of vital topology states that: “Properties of O-heads particles of max. form and |-limbs fields of max. motion are inverse, merging in Ø-bodies.” And this extends to any of its ‘disomorphic’ parallel views as relative |-past and O-future merged in Ø-present.

In the case of genus and holes, the sphere is the ‘weaker’ form’, as information is and limb or line the strongest one as motion is. But the Sphere becomes the harder surface at its ∆-1 scale, often made of triangular shapes as scales also invert its properties. While the cylindrical line tends to have the ‘weaker’ ∆-1 elements, often made of circles:

ð: The sphere just accepts one cut and has zero genus; but its stronger ∆-1 ‘triangular parts’ act as the entropic membrane that protects its internal informative center, on ‘top’ of the whole, guiding it towards the future. In spherical forms, it predates the vital energy of its enclosed inner region, which it invaginates with fractal networks, focused on the central singularity it mirrors in a larger scale. So the vital energy is between a ‘sword’ (the membrane that kills you by perpendicular penetration – as the invaginations of the biological stomach show) and a hard place (the singularity of maximal density that kills you by warping)’ as they say.

ST: The vital energy thus has the genus of the toroid; which *needs two* cuts to die= become transformed into a new more entropic variety, a flat surface of motion and energy that feeds both the membrane and the singularity.

$T: Limbs are the |-function of entropy which is ‘expendable’ and can receive multiple cuts perpendicular to the cylinder without loosing its variety; often regenerating itself in many vital organisms. Thus it is related to the vital energy of the system.

@: Finally the singularity is the more complex, more informative, smaller ∞ dual function, a donuts, whose genus is 6, as you can do 3 superficial cuts laterally (inside the two holes and outside the whole form) and 3 perpendicularly, in the bridge between holes and between the donuts and the outer world.

It is thus the hardest, most efficient of all the elements of most supœrganisms.

So the GENUS of each variety also *defines its difficulty to trans-form, which grows* as we grow in complexity. Which makes the *form with minimal genus that is, whose number of dissections is minimal, not only the simplest form-function but the easiest to transform; another reason why the sphere is ‘original seed’ of most species.*

**The balance kept in pegging S<ST>t-species.**

Thus in palingenesis and morphogenesis we assist, departing from the seed, a series of vital peggings and tearings of forms to change and evolve till they settle into their main dimotional role within the whole:

If the seed= sphere tears its caps becomes then an entropic digestive cylinder.

If then it is pegged to the axis of the open sphere, having both the same 0 Euler characteristic (a property of balance latter studied in more detail). So they fit perfectly by adjacency=parallelism not by Darwinian perpendicularity; as the sphere has the central hole which the cylinder can close. Hence a positive *evolutionary merging occurs to create the commonest form of the Universe, a rotary membrain with a central axis that absorbs and emits information and energy for its centered singularity*.

Indeed, the first natural evolution of all kind of systems is exactly the combination of a sphere and a digestive tube in the axis, not only in particles with its axis through which a magnetic field or similar ‘flows’ of energy pass, but also in biological systems all of which have evolved from the initial sponges and hydras with a digestive tube, with two openings, a mouth and an anus.

Finally in the center of the tubular body or in the top ‘mouth’, where higher information flows there will be a new topological evolution, now reclosing the tube at a point, or narrowing it, to create a singularity in command of the whole.

But this system, which is still dominant as an informative sphere, is *far more efficient and balanced as it now has the 3 canonical parts/networks needed to survive – the digestive tract for entropic feeding, the singularity-focus of information and the original sphere or rotating angular 3D-momentum.*

**Topological evolution and topological transformations**

In that regard, the main innovation of ∆st in topology is the explanation of its laws as dynamic vital transformative events, through the addition of balanced s=t symmetries that select the best ‘complete’ survival forms of the Universe, understanding developmental evolution, which **we call topological evolution** and use in all sciences.

As 5D is also interested in a transformation of scale, dimension or form that modify and evolve topological functions; in changes caused by new adjacencies, new perpendicularities and new social parallelisms.

Then we talk of a topological d=evolution (inverse of topological transformations when no change happens):

“A topological evolution is a change in the form and function of the s, st, t parts of the being caused by new adjacencies, new perpendicularities and new social parallelisms.”

We diverge from some classic topologic definitions. For example, some geometers consider a donuts to be the same variety than a flat plane, because you can cut the empty donuts, spread it in 2 D and alas! you have the plane, but they are not the same. Since* cutting the donuts produces a topological devolution to a state of lesser form that flattened looses 1 dimension.*

The function changes from a closed cycle of vital energy (donuts) to an open flat plane of entropic motions.

Open vs. closed surface are thus an essential duality of the informative vs. entropic poles of reality. However, apart from these topologies there also exist the so-called one-sided surfaces on which there are not two distinct sides. The simplest of these is the well-known “Möbius band”, which is obtained when we take a rectangular strip of paper ABCD and paste together the two opposite short sides AB and CD. Such one-sided membranes do NOT close and break space-time in the classic sense of spherical membranes but are *akin in function to the toroid geometry, as the vital energy quanta within them cannot escape in an eternal return – being its main distinction to require two loops instead of one; and its main use in a complex understanding of spin geometries (see paper on 5D quantum physics)*.

Nature overwhelmingly favors closed surfaces, because the Universe is a fractal of superorganisms that are worlds in themselves, but the survival=efficiency of a Möbius band, resides in its paradoxically duality: it is opened to the outer world *as a whole but its ∆-1 parts that cycle through it cannot escape. *Those functions are then proper of systems which want to *increase its surface of exposure to the external world and are strong enough to take it as parts and wholes; hence* systems with 5D-entropic functions, also achieved through fractal scalar perpendicular invaginations (as in digestive systems). I.e. The Möbius concept can be equated to a chiral molecule, which cannot be over imposed on its mirror image.* *So chiral molecules are good for optical activity and entropic light dispersion (5D function) or for explosive propellants motions of aggressive atoms (oxygen, chlorine) such as the… Perchlorotriphenylamine (:

**The inverse process: jetting off handles and limbs.**

Topological evolution is a fertile field, which will become along theory of supœrganisms (social evolution) the 2 essential ad ons to biology in the XXI c. It is the clearest expression of the laws of existential algebra with its inversions, symmetries and restrictions of form, putting at play all the elements of 5Dimotional reality. For example, as the Universe is mostly ‘asymmetric in time, space and scale’, all processes happen in inverse fashion with a slightly different outcome (whereas perfect symmetry can only be found in ‘regular polytopes =geometric numbers’ and spheres (see number theory). And yet asymmetries tend to balance S and T events. So if we ‘sink’ a membrain it will bulk but likely it will do so in multiple ∑informative jets. As hardly any process is equal since the inverse arrows have diverging properties. In this case the ‘punch’ being a painful entropic ‘aggression’, it brings an ∑∆-1 multiple ‘expulsion’. * Such *inversion of the process of ‘hollowing’ the axis of the sphere, happened *i*n the hydra where the balance law that created a hole digestive sink, inversely jetted off tentacle limbs with an inverse informative function.

This duality is also a fundamental theme of classic now converted into vital topology – sinks and handles.

So within the principle of ∆st asymmetric balances, at common topological evolution takes place: the sphere with holes fills inversely with handles, as the form of the cylinder jets outwards ‘closing’ in pairs the spheres’ holes:

In abstract topology we take a spherical surface and cut 2p spherical holes in it. We divide these holes into p pairs and attach to each pair of holes (at the edges) a cylindrical tube (a “handle”). We obtain a sphere with p “handles” or as it is called, a normal surface of genus p. The order of connectivity of this surface is 2p. And in nature is often happening in synchronicity with other spheres to chain them to each other.

We shall then leave genus theory here, to explore latter in our introduction to 5D elliptic geometry how a ‘real species’ constructs handles, through antipodal points managed by the central singularity – as the spatial symmetry of opposite antipodal points proper of the elliptic geometry of an internal @-mind/membrane system creates the handles and displaces them in the surface to connect with other fractal points in the external world.

Or alternately to create an inverse entropic function, the handle born of a first ‘suction’ and then an ‘expulsion’ of continuous matter from the system, can be cut and cupped to become an aggressive horn (a method of topology used in the abstract classification of varieties, which became famous with Perelman’s proof of Poincare’s conjecture, we also prove somewhere in a ‘margin’ with the experimental method as we do with Fermat’s grand theorem).

Alas, we got through ST-inversions and symmetries a couple of entropic moving or defensive limbs, as the sphere becomes a stronger T.œ. Moreover the ‘section’ of the limb will not mean the section of a vital part of the sphere, which means the death of a T.œ. So Hydras and Lizards keep loosing tails and limbs and keep functioning.

Further on, every closed surface lying in our ordinary space is topologically equivalent either to a sphere, or to a sphere with a certain number of handles: For example, the torus surface can be deformed continuously into a sphere with a single handle… So once more our ‘perfect topological form’, the sphere shows how it can become easily either of the two other varieties, the limb or the vital energy of toroid forms.

What is interesting then is that all topological forms can be born of such sphere with handles – the original egg/morula of any living being.

** **

**sT: CALCULUS**

“The instant (ƒ) has not Time; Time is made from the movement of the instant (T=1/ƒ).” Leonardo

‘I propose 1/n as the measure of an infinitesimal. I propose 1/R as the measure of curvature.’ Leibniz

‘Calculus studies functions of existence: it extracts finitesimals, 1/x of ¬∆@st, integrating them in reproductive, collapsing waves: *1/x ∆st*. Hence ¡ts reflects mathematically the laws of existential algebra.’ L§

**Why calculus is so important to science: Reproduction of form in 5D and its mathematical mirror: calculus.**

The Universe is an ∆-fractal of spatial information and temporal energy, (ab. ∆ST) that reproduces information, forms-in-action, forms of space with motions in time*. *

But reproduction has an essential feature: it happens in a lower plane as a seed that reproduces, integrates its parts and evolves into a whole – the exact method we use in the mathematical discipline of calculus.

As all this is what actually calculus calculates: It finds a finitesimal part of reality and then integrates it as a sum, through a path that might be a motion in space, a growth in ∆-scale or a repetition in ‘time; whereas the function of existence of the form displaces and reproduces its orthogonal parameters of form and motion. So physical forms are constantly reproducing, ‘calculating’ and the equivalence between the tools of calculus as mirror of the process of reproductive locomotion become crystal clear.

Let us then from the general texts on 5D bring here only the specific analysis of relativity of motion and form, with the 3 features that are essential to the process of calculus:

– The symmetry beween space-form (height dimension) and time-motion (length-dimension), or S=T mimicked in calculus by the orthogonal smooth form of ∂x/∂y, and its differentials.

– The finitesimal nature of change=motion in time, as it happens from minimal parts in a lower scale of the fifth dimension.

– The reproductive nature of all motion, as the reproduction of information in an ∆-1 wave state then integrated, as it collapses in its particle form.

**Reproduction as the origin of the 5 Dimotions of existence.**

How many types of reproduction there are, is a complex subject that would require a whole treatise in existential algebra published elsewhere on those texts.

Let us then define the most important for calculus, according to the general method of existential algebra that distinguish always 3±¡ possibilities:

**∆ Social reproduction:** A reproduction might be persistent in time, creating a process of scalar social wholes; when the reproduction ‘lasts memorially in time’, larger social wholes, ∆-1 ∑∆-1 > ∆^{0} (using symbols of existential algebra).

**Ts: Locomotion & Lineal Inertia. **If the reproduction fades away at the same rate it happens, we observe then a locomotion, through space-time.

**St: Angular momentum:** If the reproduction doesn’t move in space, we observe a cycle of space-time, which can be equal to the previous cycle.

**SS-vortex motion:** In the reproduction shrinks in space size and increases in cyclical time speed (according to 5D metrics: S x T=C), we talk of growth of informative frequency, travelling to a smaller scale of the fifth dimension.

**TT:** if the reproduction grow in size tracing a +π cycle, we talk of an entropic reproduction that slows down the motion of the system.

*Those are the 5 essential forms of reproduction in ∆ST, which correspond to 5 Dimotions of space-time and are studied by the functions of calculus in physical systems.*

**FINITESIMALS: Þ**

**∆-1: Lebiniz’s definition of S=T Finitesimals: 1/n: minimal curvature. ∆-1 unit. **

It is then obvious that the key concept of 5D calculus is a finitesimal. A finitesimal in lineal space-time is a frequency step or wave-length. A finitesimal in curved spacetime is a minimal curvature of a clock cycle. A finitesimal in scale is a minimal unit of population.

But we use other term for any finitesimal 0’; that is, a bit more than 0’, which can be either curvature, ¡-1 unit of population or frequency motion. 0’ is then the mental finitesimal – the minimal quantity in existence of a being, which still remains the being; the seed, the mind of the species, the mother-cell that must therefore exist for any being, as the template which will develop the immanent program of exi»st¡ence, which does NOT need to be stored within the finItesimal 0’.

And inversely as the reciprocal of SS-minds with no motion are TT-entropy with maximal motion; and the reciprocal of zero is infinity, and almost 0’, immensity, which we write with the symbol µ. The finitesimal of entropy is the largest domain of the being, beyond which the being dies. It is a real definition of the borders of the mind, as in its equation, 0’-mind x µ spacetime cycles of the Universe = K- World; 0’ x µ = K.

We thus talk of immensity as the entropic limit in which the being no longer is. And both obviously act *in calculus as the limits of a definite integral. Thus we can define calculus with the 5 Dimotions of existence. Since the finitesimals of ∆ST will be integrated between its two limits of SS an TT, to give us its whole ‘worldcycle’ in time, or ‘closed circle’ in space, sum of its ‘stœps’ or ‘curvatures’, or its ‘wholeness’ in scale, sum of its finitesimal parts, showing the deep entanglement and symmetry between ∆, S and T:*

* ∆st.*

*We use **µ as the best symbol for immensity; or œ, also the symbol for the whole supœrganism, when **µ is not available, as the whole is also the limit of existence for the ∆-1 being, more exactly its world, O’ x **µ = œ.*

*The subtle difference being that **µ is external to the being that perceives it, but has pure entropy; that is potentially feeds the creation of multiple Kaleidoscopic monad-worlds, and œ is specific, **µ has been ordered to become a ‘whole:ab. œ’.*

*But let’s not fancy too much ourselves with existential algebra, its profound paradoxes and symbols, returning to classic calculus. *

I propose then 3 alternative symbols, L, for the classic limit as the finitesimal of space, ƒ, for Finitesimal in time, as frequency, and þ as the symbol of a palingenetic cycle, for finitesimal of scale, and will be using ƒ for commodity, with þ as the less confusing symbol for all the cases. And write as the general formula:

Þ:1/¡, whereas ¡, might be in classic mathematics, N, the whole population, T, the period or R the radius:

**Þ(∆)=1/n; þ(S)=1/R=K; þ(T)=1/T=ƒ; Þ(@)=0’; Þ(¬)=****µ**

It is then fascinating to observe that the 3 finitesimals of scale, space and time have the same equation in classic mathematics, 2 of them discovered by Leibniz; that guy who unlike Newton ‘hit a target nobody could see’ (:

This of course is only the beginning; and as usual we shall pounder more the philosophical aspects of 5D calculus, leaving for ‘pros’ with imagination, a humble realization that new beginnings are simple but *always found by amateurs without the burden of knowledge that an entire new world of calculus of which I have just swimmed on the surface with unfocused diving glasses, awaits to the brave.*

**What is the 1 in the equations of finitesimals, a whole or a stœp**

** **Thus the infinitesimal does not exist – being space quantic, there will be always a limit, a micro-cycle of time or quanta of population in space, to signify the finitesimal point, as Leibniz rightly understood and defined it with a simple powerful form: 1/n.

Indeed in the Universe finitesimals tend to be structured as in a russian doll, such as the biggest wholes, n-> have the smallest finitesimals, 1/n->0’. *But and this is the incredible magic insight of Leibniz’s ¡n:finitesimal, 1/n is also the formula for a curvature in space. And as S=T, for the minimal motion of a clock of time. So we do have a concept in ∆ST¡-1 that we shall then ‘integrate’ through a relative path with the finite limit of a worldcycle, where the function is meaningful (that is has a value, ƒ(x,y)≥1/n), and relates ∆ and ∆-1 through its ‘stœps’ of change. *We does connect in this manner calculus to 5D reality, no longer base in human invented, axiomatic concepts of absolute zeros and infinities, limits and the paradoxes enclosed within them.

The 0’ size is thus the finitesimal. In praxis, we humans only observe a finitesimal from our mind perspective, whose minimal form is an h’ quantum of the planck scale, and accordingly we see a Universe of inverse relative size, being humans in the ∆º middle view (at cellular level) as physicists wonder without realizing this is NOT a coincidence, but a natural law of the scalar, fractal organic structure of the Universe:

So we accept Leibniz’s concept of a finitesimal, as ALL organic systems have a minimal cellular quanta and a maximal enclosure, which in mathematics can be represented in the o-1 finitesimal circle, closed above, *as it becomes the 1 element in ∆-1 of the ∆º whole, which is represented by * the 1- equivalent graph, which is opened above into the wholeness of a larger Universe (but will have also a limit normally in the decametric logarithmic scale of the ∆º whole world embedded in the ∆+1 truly infinite Universe).

*W*hat the 3±¡ finitesimals of existence have is the 1 on ‘top’? As we can consider 0’ 1/µ and µ, 1/0.

*And it can mean two things, the whole as 1=**µ in the 0-1 palingenetic Universe or the 0’ as the finitesimal in the 1-**µ Cartesian domain. *So we find that immensity can be a finitesimal.

*If 1 is taken as the finitesimal, it becomes then a step in a curvature, which tends to be ‘lineal’, as all steps are discontinuous motions between two points, which can always be closed with a straight line.*

So by definition the minimal curvature step is always a line of infinite curvature (: And we need two steps to find a ‘real curvature’, whose maximal value, for a step back and forth will be 360º.

If 1 is the finitesimal of time, frequency, it will be the minimal event, hence a closed time cycle. And as such it will be the sum of finitesimal curvature steps.

If 1 is the finitesimal of a population, then it will be its minimal meaningful part, often a ‘seed’ or mind-singularity, and n its whole population, and the smaller the finitesimal 1 is the larger the n-population will be in the nested Universe, when we measure ∆-2 finitesimal ‘bites’ of energy-feeding.

But for a finitesimal to persist as a unit of population it must not be erased after its ‘stœp’; so its cycle must be repeated in time.

And thus we realize there is a chain relationship between the 3 finitesimals such as:

**∑∑s=∑T=∆-1.**

A deep result in both calculus and existential algebra, which can be said as follows:

Space is a slice of time which is a slice of ∆-planes, and so we grow in dimensional motions and wholeness when we move from space/curvature steps to fulfill a whole time cycle, which however is just a frequency of memoriless form, that only when *persists by repeating its cycles in the same region of spacetime becomes the unit of population.*

Thus calculus uses a unit of change, h, to mirror different changes In the 5 dimotions of existence. Since change once it happens in small units, in small scales, in small instants of time; differentiate in 5 type of dimensional motions = actions: TT, feeding, entropic and moving, Ts, changes, informative & perceptive St, SS changes, reproductive changes, ST, proper.

That diversification is studied better with different algebraic operands; but all can be derived into its finitesimal units of change and integrated, for different scalar groups, social functions and paths of dimotional change. As we have studied networks of finitesimal parts and time dimotions and its worldcycles that integrate them, just will comment on curvature finitesimals and its integration in whole spiral, circles & forces.

**CURVATURE OF SPACE.**

**A Disomorphic example on how to understand homology of stiences.**

The differences between classic calculus and 5D calculus are thus small, mainly conceptual, but on the ‘fringes’ it will have real consequences for understanding paradoxes of physics; and the philosophical foundations of mathematics. On techniques and what mathematicians like most, crunching numbers and equations, very little new at this stage is expected. And this is comforting cause as I say is summerday and I don’t want to write too much. But do not dismiss the paper. Because this is real existential calculus. Consider the finitesimal of space, curvature. 1//R is the simplest one; the curvature of a circle. It follows that the straight line has *a finitesimal* curvature. But also that there must be, an immense curvature – as now ‘absolute infinite does not exist’ because ia limited infinite is the reciprocal of 0’.

*But how curvature can be immense, close to infinity? Mathematicians define curvature for a curve as d**f/ds where ϕ is the inclination of the sensed tangent and s is the arc length measured from some fixed point.*

*This limits curvature; but physicists have the not resolved paradox that curvature in Relativity can be infinite, or rather immense. The solution? 5D (:*

It is also ‘embedded’ in the complicated formulae and principles of relativity. In relativity the principle of equivalence between acceleration and an attractive vortex of mass; and the principle of Newton that gives a change of motion, hence an acceleration to the curvature of a motion that is not lineal. Thus curvature and acceleration are similar concepts and the more curved a ‘curve’ is, the faster is growing its speed. *It is then the concept of a force, charge or mass, an accelerated curvature of space-time of the ∆-1 or ∆+1 physical scales. It is then the implicit concept in Newton’s equivalent formulae, as G, or in Coulomb’s k factor. *

This is also embedded in the solution to that differential equation:

*Which the reader will notice has a second derivative above, that is usually the symbol of acceleration.*

*But in 5D we can define curvature by the S=T symmetry also as a measure of acceleration, this is possible because as we diminish in size, according to the metrics of 5D, $xð=K (whereas $ is a symbol for lineal space and ð for cyclical time; so we could write in physical terms, Lxƒ=K, but as usual 5D existential algebra symbols are more general and new to use them in any science).*

*So when we carry curvature in space to acceleration in time, it becomes ‘frequency’, and curvature can have in space any angle above 2π=360º; or in terms of length.*

**The connection between existential algebra and calculus: Dimotions as actions. Reproduction as change.**

Existential algebra and calculus study time change. How can then unify all time changes? The answer comes from existential algebra and its finding that all forms of change can be reduced to reproductive change. Which itself can be considered a travel down and up two scales of the fifth dimension. Thus changes happens on finitesimal parts that emerge and affect larger wholes.

The function of existence is a function of reproduction in scale (as a 5D journey) in time (as a conjunction of the 5 Dimensional motions of existence), and space, as a simultaneous growth of clone information; formalized in the fractal generator of 5D metrics, Max. ∑Te x S¡ (s=t) = c; as reproduction happens in a ‘present s=t state’, of balance when the relative past of lesser informed flows of entropic time, Te, becomes Imprinted by Spatial information: Past TT-entropy x Future SS-form = Reproductive ST Present

Change happens informatively through increase of finitesimal parts, entropically when you loose those scalar parts. Reproduction of form or its annihilation at the finitesimal scale in calculus is mirrored by a simple function, F(x+h)/F(x), that calculates ratios of change, for different operands that mirror the 5 Dimensional motions of existence, which can potentially change.

Thus what both disciplines, calculus and existential algebra have in common is the object of its linguistic mirrors: Times=changes, all kind of them.

That apparently they seem so different wears witness to the ultimate nature of mind-monads, infinity mirrors that reflect always different points of view on reality and its i-magination to slightly bend that reality to the point of view of the mind.

Still it is more notable its common elements than its differences.

Calculus though has its emphasis in numbers hence in the scalar analysis of huge social groups in motion; while existential algebra has its emphasis in discrete dimotions, hence on the study of individual T.œs experiencing a trans-form-ation.

The very essence of calculus is to study in synchronous spatial dimotion huge amounts of numbers, which will erase its ‘discrete’ form to appear as a continuous susceptible to be studied at the ∆+1 scale of the whole.

The emphasis of Existential algebra is the study of that whole as an individual subject to sequential dimotions.

But *in both cases the dynamic process of study are the 5 Dimotions of time=change of the universe. *

Finally logic systems and Boolean algebras become the syntax of verbal and computer minds that describe with its sentences the dynamic dimotions of reality. So its language is closer to that of Existential Algebra, reason why we include it in this paper, instead of the more advanced models of existential algebra termed, monologic, duality, trinity, pentalogic and dodecalogic.

To fully grasp that essential connection between ∆st and calculus mirrors, we must first understand how *species on one hand, and equations on the other, probe in the Planes of reality to obtain its quanta of space-time converted either in motion steps or information pixels, to build up reality. *

The connection between existential algebra and calculus is qualitative: both study initially the finitesimal action of existence, *which become the finitesimal quanta of spacetime, whose repetitive accumulation causes the phenomena of time-change. Existential algebra though studies the qualitatively in terms of sequences between the 5 Dimotions, and calculus quantitatively focusing in one single dimotion spread in a group of scalar numbers*.

This is the case because the actions of beings happen through finitesimals extracted from other ∆-plane scales.

In all Planes, the simpler actions of any being *are extractions of motion, energy and form from lower ∆-i Planes:*

A T.œ perceives only the ∆±3 planes from where it extracts energy or information. As its actions and dimotions are architectonically performed through planes of 5D where each main action relates to an interval of scales:

∆-4-3: The system extracts indistinguishable boosts of entropic of motion (man from gravitation).

∆-3-2: The system extracts bits of information (Light in man)

∆-2-1: The system extracts bites of energy (amino acids in man)

∆-1 0: The system seeds its minimal seed of reproduction.

∆0+1: The system connects socially with other systems to evolve into a whole.

*So simpler Actions start at finitesimal level, gathering in sequential patterns in existential algebra, as ‘time flows’ and in population and spatial patterns – in integral herds of numbers in calculus.*

We and all other beings perceive from ∆-3 quanta (light in our case), feed on amino acids, (∆-2 quanta for any ∆º system), seed with seminal ∆-1 cellular quanta (electrons also, with ∆-1 photon quanta).

For each action of space-time we shall find a whole, ∆º T.œ, which will enter in contact with another world, ∆±i, from where it will extract finitesimals of space or time, energy or information, entropy or motion, and this will be the finitesimal ∂ ƒ(x), which will be absorbed and used by the species to obtain a certain action, å.

Analysis allow us to extract actions from wholes, reason why there are not really use beyond the third derivative of a being, as super organisms co-exist in 3 only Scalar Planes. It also works in terms of a volume, as its derivative is a plane, then its unit-cell or point… So to speak, if you derivate a world, you get its organism, and if you derivate it again you get its cell and then its molecular parts. And then if you do that in time, you get its speed and then its acceleration and then its jerk.

**Derivative vs. integral in time and space. **

Derivatives & integrals calculate ratios of change in the 3 elements of reality, space, time=change and its Planes*, ∆ST The main error of ‘axiomatic’ analysis is to force continuity, infinitesimals and infinities, without considering the discontinuous limits of derivatives and integrals of parts and wholes between planes of existence.*

Leibniz vs. Newton already argued what is an infinitesimal part, the *unit* of derivatives. The answer in a Universe, which is a fractal scalar system of stœps of space-time, S<T>S, or S=S=S, T=T=T, is a minimal quanta in SCALE, TIME or SPACE, which by virtue of 5D metric, SxT=K, will be a ‘minimal unit’ on that equation (Min. S x Max. T), for the quanta of space, Min. T x Max. S for the quanta of frequency, or minimal cyclical bit of information.

So for example the inverse, ƒ=1/T of a long duration in time, will be its short quanta. The inverse of a population, taken as a whole, 1, 1/n will be a scalar space quanta. So all systems have *an infinitesimal, which is a cut-off limit, NOT really an ‘infinitely small’ (an error of the continuous dogma of the axiomatic method), but a ‘finitesimal’. So we can obtain through a derivative a finitesimal unit of time, space or scale, a minimal action, a minimal point-volume or a minimal cellular quanta.*

*And for that reason we can approach finitesimals with ‘differentials’, which become the minimal ‘lineal steps’ of a long curve. And for that reason we can use ‘affine functions in space’ and lineal approximations, as by definition the shortest path between two points is a line, and so in a discontinuous Universe of Stœps, quanta are minimal lineal units; minimal fractal points of a population or a whole.*

*It is a complete overhauling of the dogmatic attempts to prove the ‘hypothesis of the continuum’, but it is not my fault that humans are so off-track with the reality of the Universe as it is, not as their ego tries to impose. *

**The minimal quanta of ∆-1 space and time. Chains of Dimotions expressed as chains of equations.**

Derivatives are the essential quantitative minimal action absorbed by any Tœ, (ab. space-time organism).

Integrals then sum a minimal derivative quanta in space or a minimal action in time for any being in existence.

They are best for spatial growth of information as the 3 st-ages or st-ates of the being through its world cycle of existence, *have discontinuities or changes of phase that cannot be integrated. Hence *time sequences are better studied with existential algebra. Further on sequences can be come more complex, if we consider tridimensional actions as combinations of S and T states, stt, tst, tss, sss which is the origin among other things of the 3!=6 variations of species according to hierarchy on its physiological networks studied in trinity.

*Further on, and this will constantly be the limit of mathematical analysis of reality, we should stress once more than the larger more complex actions of gender reproduction and social evolution are qualitative, taking place both in longer time spans and longer spatial surfaces – hence better described with qualitative logic languages.*

So existential algebra studies in depth the qualitative connection of the a,e,i,o,u actions between Planes. That qualitative analysis at the larger scale and for sequences that imply changes of state cannot be overlooked and require the approach of existential algebra.

And calculus is its mathematical, analytic development (quantitative understanding of 1st second and 3rd derivatives – extracting ‘1,2,3 Dimotions’ from the invisible gravitational, light space-time or feeding Planes.

The limit of calculus however is bridged by the fact that the other families of social operands (±, x÷, x^{a} can reflect better the ‘social re-product-ive actions’.

*So another duality way to differentiate algebraic operands is to consider that classic polynomial operands mirror social complex actions, and calculus operands reflect better also in ‘trinity scales’ (3 first derivatives or ternary integrals) the simplex actions. Each Operand specializes in one Dimotion (angular sine/cosine in Perception, ± in back and forth locomotions, x ÷ in complementary and social evolution, log xª in reproduction) and OVER all of them a new Plane of existence is accessed by analysis. So operands guide the mathematical equations through a vital process of stœps (stops and steps) and will allow us to ‘vitalize’ equations, as we have done with points with ‘numerical parts’ as the essence of a mathematical T.œ*

¬Æ thus sets a limited number of logic propositions that can happen when a system or group of T.œs interact through its 5 Ðimotions, as an point of view, can potentially change its state between those 5 Dimotions, and the limits of its function of existence, such as the being can only exists without permanent disruption of its ‘vital constants’, (conserved energy, angular and lineal momenta – energy and membrain). All systems can exist with the infinite cut-off limits of space (membrain) and time (death), which are set as part of the fractal Universe. Only the whole if potential or real in existence can be talked off as a function of infinity but not perceived.

So a point will start any of the 5 Ðimotions and we need formal symbols to address the Ðimotion of any being in existence, and the states of switch between Ðimotions.

Does the being stop before switching Ðimotion? If so it would simple to establish then for each sequential steps of a being:

∆¡ Ð1,3,2,4,3…. and so on as a simple 5 letter process of the actions of a being (whereas 4Ð entropy refers to feedings not dean, only in it final state being ‘that entropy’… So we know all sequential of a being ends in 4Ð.

Can then we run a sequential for any species through its life as a complete deterministic sequence?

There is there the sequence of all sequences, the perfect worldcycle=life sequence?

*Questions those for advanced existential algebra.*

**RECAP**. Actions in timespace are the main finitesimal part of reality, its quantity of time or space. In pentalogic operands mirror as actions the 5D vowels (a,e,i,o,u) that define the five dimotions of existence. In calculus they first extract the minimal timespace quanta of the actions of the being, integrating them across a population of space or a length of time. Thus actions vitalize the operands of calculus, relating them to existential algebra.

*The fantasy of the continuum substitutes the reality of discontinuous sum. *

The age of calculus represents a great advance over simpler polynomial operands and statistical≈T-probabilistic methods of studying, the parts and wholes of a system; and its S=T interaction between its spatial form and temporal motions; as it differentiated by studying the change of each of the previous 5 Dimotional operands of algebra, all modes of change=time natural to any system of the Universe – as the best mathematical language that mirrors them.

This duality of ∆-scales and S=T dimotions represented in algebra by numerical systems and operands was studied in a bulk manner with polynomials and S-tatistics=T-probabilistic methods that appeared first, using inverse scalar operands on the ladder of 3 scales of numbers, the sum, the product and different exponentials and inverse roots and logarithms – which reduced the range of exponentials to the 3 scales that matter to the Universe, the Log_{10} or social evolution of triads into 3×3+I new decametric scales, the exponential Ln of maximal growth or death=decay and the log_{2} or ‘power set’ of all parts of a whole.

Probability showed in time (frequency events) or space (statistical populations) that events were not perfect, but accumulated errors in its reproduction, shaping a normal distribution often converted into an entropic population of disconnected individuals forming herds or events that withered away due to those errors of reproduction, when trying to reproduce the perfect mean; *to form an identical statistical ‘boson’ species, a perfect form that transcended scale – a feat of becoming a whole ∆+1 that was* only achieved in Dirac’s distributions by immortal point-particles or resonances that amplified the perfect information of ∑ finitesimal 0’s to become the whole ∆+1.

But what about all the range of variations between the entropic Gauss curve and the Dirac perfection? All the different specific actions of species acting in holographic Ts, ST, St dimotions that were neither perfect resonances of evolving form, or disaggregated herds of entropic aleatory motions?

This required to calculate the finitesimal form of change=time of each specific dimotion of the Universe mirrored by each specific operand, and add a given number of ‘stœps’ that measured the repetition of such minimal dimotions of a t.œ in a given length of time or volume of space to get the outcome of an existential dimotion.

*Thus by calculating each finitesimal and then integrate it through the entire interval in space, time or scale in which it was performed, calculus gets a more accurate depiction of the whole event, no longer an entropic aleatory change, but a purposeful action. And because both derivatives and integrals could be done in space, time or scale, all the range of possible *variations, could be studied, regardless of complexity, from changes of time, to variations in space represented as 0’ actions =, *d->0’; happening in minimal time (Lagrangians)… *

*The detail and specification reached by the finitesimal of an specific dimotion=operand of time=change; either angular perception – sin/cos; social evolution, ±; re=production or locomotion as reproduction of information, x÷; entropic decay and growth, e ^{x}, made calculus the queen of all operands, almost a magic tool, as its foundations were ignored. *

*Mathematicians unable to understand time=change invented the concept of limit and the continuum to form a pedantic scaffolding of axiomatic truths which had nothing to do with the reality of calculus. So we have to clarify that concept. As all is perception a continuum is merely a sum of discontinuous stœps in which part of the whole process is hidden by the selection of information by a mental space. So the fantasy of the ‘continuum’ can be reached when the detail of each stœp is ignored, and we obtain only the measure of a relative infinity, **µ, of such steps summoned up, ∫, to calculate the whole change in the long time period, T, or total domain studied. And that is fine, as long as we understand that in detail the continuum is made of a sum of discontinuous stœps of change, we call finitesimals. *

*In a process of calculus thus the sum is ‘smoothed’, eliminating the ‘stop’ states, by reducing to the minimal 0’ the size or rate of change, so they cannot be seen in detail but can be ‘integrated’ in a long period of time, obtaining a meaningful result for the ∆0 scale of the experimenter, which only went down to ∆-1 to be able to calculate with accuracy ∑∆-1=∆º – the emergence of change in the size scale of the experimenter.*

*So in the same way we care little for the ∆-1<∆ø stage of the seminal reproductive fetus – to the point humans have the right to ‘murder’ it, as long as it is not an emergent child, the observer cares little for the finitesimal, ¡ndifferent to him. And yet imprescindible for the whole to be=come.*

*This ‘goal oriented’ view of Nature is common to most beings; hence calculus became a much better method that discrete probabilities of change. Since the cumbersome reality of each stop and step of a dimotion that had to be analyzed in each individual stœp as it happens in the ∆-1 reality could be simplified to facilitate the study of changes through a longer period of time.*

*So calculus was enormously advantageous to calculate long stretches of time periods and space volumes at the human scale with minimal loss of detail, providing that the philosophy of reality made of stops and steps was not forgotten. Or else we would enter into an idealization of reality confusing the mathematical mirror with the Universe as it is. But that was precisely what it happened. Since the essential error of all minds is to confuse the Universe they don’t fully perceive with the mind that reduces it.*

*So the wrong creationist solution was taken as truth, obscuring our understanding of the principles of reality. So pundits of calculus ignored the nature of finitesimals of change, and its small stop and motion, S<T>S beats.*

*So when you study calculus they apologize for reality as it is – a series of thin steps and stops, of small finitesimals to add. And consider discontinuity – the real broken space-time an approximation to idealist simplification of a continuous graph that looses information about each finitesimal stœp. Instead the artifact, the continuous function is considered the truth and reality a method to reach the ideal truth.*

* As the graph of Descartes, the artifact, became the nature of space and time, the substances of which we are all made. And suddenly humans were not longer made of cyclical time and fractal space, broken by the limit of a membrain, but God had drawn a Cartesian graph below as background absolute Newtonian lineal spacetime – something most scientists still believe due to creationist mathematics, and the egocy paradox that confuses the mind language with reality itself; the simplification of calculus that smoothed the finitesimals became reality.*

*Fact is h finitesimals are real, and never reach a 0 that doesn’t exist as horror vacuum works, and so mathematicians should teach reality and then acknowledge that the experimental language of mathematics simplifies that reality; and that is Ok for practical reasons. Not the other way around. *

When I was a wonderkid before high school I had a math professor who came one day worried about the fact he had to explain us the ‘limit’ of h->0 and thought his students wouldn’t understand. Of course students never understand a dot of it, just memorize and say they understand. *But I understood it was all wrong. Thus he ended up throwing me out of the class (: when I told him, the limit can never reach 0. Since If nothing exists, there is no way to define it, hence calculate it. Nothing might be anything. Only if something is no longer zero but leaves a trace we can define it. So I told him undefined things should not be the realm of an ‘exact’ science. *That blew him away and having no answer he resorted to authority (: So I was kicked out as I wouldn’t ever yield to authority but reason. It was my first realization that when humans don’t understand something or something is wrong but they want it anyway they put up a dogma, a postulate, a pedantic definition or ‘self-evident axiom’ (:

Fact is if h->0 makes an equation undefined, h *must stop before it looses the quality of the whole – hence h is the last atom, last cell, last frequency, last temperature vibration*.

As he just ignored me with the pretentious authoritas of an old man who doesn’t see an elephant in the drawing of a hat, le petit prince has to search for himself. Which is what I have always done. So the question is where to stop a finitesimal portion. And the answer is as we said, before it becomes random, ¡ndifferent.

For example e is defined as (1+1/n)^{n }. Yet if n is ∞, the parenthesis is 1+ 0 .0000000… up to infinity. And those are undefined limits of reality.

*Physicists at least acknowledge physical laws are idealizations of reality and that is Ok (even if they deny non-mathematical properties that ‘cannot be measured as tge organic and sentient properties of particles, the units of life). So their egocy paradox is a bit different from that of mathematicians with its axiomatic truths. *

*Still more profound mathematicians do understand a continuous function as one in which S=T happens, so the X and Y coordinates do not make very different changes, and stœps of ‘present’ can be put one after another. Or as Leonardo said: “The instant does not have time; time is made from the movement of the instant. In rivers, the water that you touch is the last of what has passed, and the first of that which comes. So with time present. Observe the light. Blink your eye and look at it again. That which you see was not there at first, and that which was there is no more.”*

*As the second, the glimpse of an eye is the quanta of human present, there is always for all timespaces a quanta we shall call an instant of time-present or a finitesimal of populations. *

*And when the ratio of change in time, its quanta, is balanced to the minimal form of space it change, so in an S=T graph each point-position-stop of the moving-step function is close, with a ‘tangent angle, s/t’ that can be smoothed in a series… the sum of discontinuous stœps of a dimotion, can be measured as a continuous, larger stœp of space-time of a larger ∆+1 scale. *

*Thus continuity is not the limit in which h->0, but the limit in which S≈T*…. *and hence an instant of present change that is harmonious between the S and T components of the being that doesn’t change internally but only externally (as S=T remains unchanged) takes place. *

This has deep implications, as it implies that *the system is continuous because it lasts, and it lasts because its ‘actions’ tend to zero internal change, becoming conserved cycles of energy for the inner structure of the being. Changes thus are always ‘returning to balance’. And when change is extreme, as in an internal x external TT-entropic change, the system collapses, the ‘tangent’ tends to zero or infinite in the Y(s) or X(t) axis and the ‘function ends’. Which implies that calculus works on the St, ST and Ts dimotions of locomotion, information and energy=reproduction, NOT on SS-form with no change or TT-absolute change with no form.*

*For example, the first dimotion to calculate as change was the space traversed by a system which in detail is just a series of steps, which add to the space traversed, **l(s) x ƒ (t)=S. This give us a lot of detail in numerical approximations if we further break it to a sum of steps, ∑ **l(s¡) x ∑ƒ (te)=S.*

*So the more information we want, the more detailed the discontinuity becomes, till we can indeed add each ‘fractal step’ with all the information, length and time duration of each step. But we don’t want that much information, so we can simplify with ‘statistical means’ since as we have seen in statistics, the law of great numbers bring a mean for each stœp and that is the justification of simplifying into continuity – NOT the non experimental idealist, mind-generated, creationist hypothesis of the continuum. *

*So it is fine to be humble and marvel at the fact we can ‘transcend’ the ∆-1 finitesimal scale, into parameters of the whole by making ¡ndifferent the information at ∆-1 through statistical methods that average each step, erasing the uneeded information on each stop (when the motion touches the floor, or the mover looks and gathers information). But when trying to understanding paradoxes such as the speed of light constancy, as each electron emits light in a relative entangled stop position to the perceiver that measures its speed, hence in a stop distance, (Lorentz transformations) it is good to know that there is no magic on it. And the ‘idealized’ form is the mathematical transformation that eliminates the stop state of the electron for a continuous motion we do NOT observe in Nature (the electron is always observed as a stop particle when emitting light, and moves in zig-zag as if it were all the time calculating its trajectory in a stop position). *

*The methods of calculus are awesome and once we realize the cruelty of the Universe that cares nothing for the differences between the ¡ndifferent finitesimals of a mass-group herded and ruled by the ∆0 larger scale by mass-methods, including humans as we show in the models of history and economics herded today by financiers with credit ratios established by anonymous big data computers, herded by politicians with equalizing laws for each ‘social class’, herded by military as soldiers or numbers of a concentration camp… and past over the thought that each atom might be a galaxy of its own, and dare to explode it in an accelerator with other atom, which might on the microscopic scale provoke the biggest genocide of infinite relative planets, and connect with the Tao and feel just to be, ∆@st, which matters nothing and worship the ¡ogic of GoÐoG the inverse Dimotions of existence, we can rest in peace, R.I.P. as dust of space time that dust shall become. And so calculus…*

*The methods then are well known and we cannot but make a few comments beyond the philosophy of its science, which is the main purpose of 5D mathematics in this simplified texts. We just need to calculate a finitesimal, which was the first thing discovered in the ‘1 ^{st} age of calculus’ and summon them up to get the whole, which was first done as in reality, with the exhaustion method by the Greeks.*

*Yet the finitesimal 0’ in itself is important as it give us information about the rate of change with a single number, the tangent to the curve. Since we can apply to curvature in space its synonymous in time – speed – when we realize that s=T means in terms of curves the curve’s tangent representing the ‘speed of change’ S/T of the function. Further on as SxT=C, means that the smaller space is faster in time cycles, the more curved a cycle is the smaller it becomes and the faster it moves (vortex equation, acceleration principle in Relativity over a curved space). So we also realize, the second tangent of the curve is the acceleration of change, y”, increased as the system curves further. *

*Many more wonders then kept appearing in calculus as we play with S=T, SxT=C 5 Metric laws, and see them through calculus; specially considering that most curves are the functions of existence of an event between its 0’ points of initial and final conditions. And so what we shall do in this brief introduction to 5D calculus is to highlight for the seemingly most simple equations of calculus the underlying insights they provide on the processes of time change of the 5 DImotions of the Universe.*

*We shall do it in a historic, easier to understand narration, as indeed, the first thing a language sees is ‘space’, and ‘reality as It is’ in its simpler terms. So the first age of calculus was that of the search for finitesimals both in praxis and meaning, wrongly resolved in favor of the concept of absolute zero and limit, then mathematicians erased uneeded information on those finitesimal steps and stops establishing the method of tangents and continous sums, ∫, and then applied those functions of breaking a whole into parts to re-build it to specification to the different dimotional operands from the sin to the exponential of maximal change, marveling that the limit of change per unit of frequency time was the change of the whole, that is the equation of death in which the whole dissolves into its parts in a single quanta of time, the negative exponential so ever pervading in studies of entropic death. Of course they understood none of it – they still don’t, but the method worked to mirror the dimotions of reality, which they neither understood in an orderly manner. So calculus became magic. And as it got more complex, as the Universe does by repetitions, transformations, scaling into more complex ‘packages’ of parts, to the point that I could say, as Einstein put it – I don’t understand relativity since mathematicians got into it (: I don’t understand calculus since mathematicians got to it 🙂 . That is calculus today is so complicated in its more powerful and detailed analysis that only a computer can calculate its results. Which ultimately try to anticipate the future of change in a synoptic manner by transforming sequential patterns of change into parallel simultaneous spatial components (multiple variables in PDEs), happening in multiple points of view at the same time, to gather into a whole result, which is still impossible for the most intelligent, liquid states of multiple changes (Navier stokes equations) unless you trick it with a faster digital mind, which will do those calculus for the slower humind, jumping as we always do past the intermediate sequential steps from beginning to end.*

*The proper concept for finitesimals. Reproductive unit of change.*

*The great advance of calculus in the understanding of ∆ST changes is the concept of a finitesimal of change, h, which in the symmetry between scales, populations in space and time frequencies has the same role: to increase a ‘seminal’ unit, the system (or decreate in inverse fashion), becoming the Unit of reproduction of an ∆st system, at a point in which s=T.*

In the Universe the *fundamental form of change happens when S=T, the function of present time finds a balance and symmetry in scal,e form and motion that triggers the reproduction of the sytem and its 3 parameters.*

*Latter we will study, the simplest case of polynomial reproduction, whereas an X ^{2} has as unit of change, 2x; which means the square grows through both sides reproducing its form, in ‘s=t’ balance, in a manner that the square preserves its form. *

**The method of calculus**.

How differential equations show us the different actions of the Universe?

The correspondence to establish is between the final result, the åction, and the finitesimal quantas, the system has absorbed to perform the action, ∫∂x, such as: å= ∫ ∂x, whereas x is a quanta of time or space used by ∆ø, through the action, å to perform an event of acceleration, e-nergy feeding, information, offspring reproduction or universal social evolution.

It is then when we can establish how calculus operations are performed to achieve each type of actions.

First we notice that the space between the actor and the observable quanta is relative, so even if there are multiple ∆-planes between them the actor will treat the quanta as a direct finitesimal, pixel, bit, or bite which it then will integrate with a polynomial derivative or sinusoidal function that reflects the changes produced.

We will consider in this introductory course only a few of the finitesimal ∫∂ actions where the space state is provided by the integral and the ∂ finitesimal action by the derivative.

Derivatives point out to *the main consequence of the sum of those actions in any being in existence, namely the fact that its sums tend to favor growth of information on the being and then signal the 3 st-ages and/or st-ates of the being through its world cycle of existence, which in its simplest physical equations is the origin of… the maximal and minimal points of a well-behaved function.*

So to establish the action – the final result – we have to isolate the finitesimal quanta/moment of spacetime the system has absorbed to perform the action, ∂x, and integrate them over a surface of space or a length of time, such as: **å= ∫ ∂x, **whereas x is a moment/quanta of time or space used in repeated frequencies or quantities, ∫∂x, by ∆ø, through the action, å to perform an event of acceleration, e-nergy feeding, information, offspring reproduction or universal social evolution.

We can then establish which operand is best suit to perform each type of actions. I.e. the action of reproduction, most often is expressed for quantitative simple physical systems through the operation of re=product-ion.

We ascribe each operand to a single dimotion, but they are ‘once more’ entangled operations, which besides its preferential Dimotion, do participate of all the others – remember languages as mirrors of reality have also the same entangled properties of the pentalogic, ¬∆@ST universe, looking at all its elements. So we shall now analyze them in more depth.

We establish direct relationships of operands and actions- taking into account that for each operand we must also distinguish the dualities of ‘space-like integral of volumes and its derivative quanta’ and ‘time-like moments of motions and its frequency sum to complete a o-sum worldcycle’. And to achieve those balanced 0’ sums finally we need to define inverse operations for all actions. So we depart from a ceteris paribus analysis and search for a finitesimal, and then we must study how they merge and entangle in space and time. This is done generally speaking, with a *first partial derivative in space or time (PDE) defines those dimotions only as S or T, while the integral of double derivatives put both processes together, to find the whole action***: å(st) = ∫∫dsdt**

However as all planes of existence have discontinuities beyond its minimal quanta and larger whole, analysis through multiple Planes beyond those of ∆ø<<∑∆-1 entropic death, tend to be distorted.

Still they can be studied with power polynomials and further approached (Taylor series) with ∫∂ operators that cross planes of existence for certain highly symmetric actions across*.*

But again it is best to use existential algebra, as the fundamental limit of the mathematical language is one of synthetic understanding of the organic vital laws of the Universe, reason why theories that are only mathematical in the largest scales and do NOT understand that there are not equations that go to infinity, as all have a limit that brings a change of state, such as the big-bang theory of the universe, are false.

Reason why systems do have besides spatial mental spaces of ‘calculus’, a long-time range language of logic nature to express the vital games of worldcycles, and this is the function of existential algebra, we study first to then consider the basics of Calculus.

Finally in this brief introduction to notice a ‘revealing’ fact of the inversion between finitesimals and integrals. As the absolute arrow of time-future is social evolution of parts into wholes, while a function has *only a derivative, that is, all molecules can be reduced to a set of atoms; all living beings to the cell; the opposite is not truth: creation of complex futures is multiple. So an integral has a C variational constant and a differential equation multiple solutions: the future is open, the past is only one. *

**Its 3 ages**

The underlying order of all structures of the entangled Universe between its S, T and ∆ Components once more shows in the 3 ages of calculus, which we can terms as the scalar age, when the main question was that between parts and wholes (from Greece through Newton), the temporal age when its main focus was the description of the 5 Dimotions of physical systems (from Leibniz to Heaviside) and finally the spatial view, when its main focus is, besides the completion of the previous ages, its use to the description of mental spaces (from Gauss through Riemann and Hilbert to Einstein and quantum spaces).

**RECAP.** Analysis studies the finitesimal quanta of time, space and scale; NO ∞ in its smallness – an error of the mind Px. searching for continuity. A true philosophy of calculus thus deals with the meaning of ‘finitesimals’ in space, time and scale, as a first ‘seed’ of a ‘clone species’ multiplies, creating the regularities of ‘social numbers’ that make ‘analysis’ to work its ‘magic. Integrals in inverse fashion act after ‘calculating’ this minimal point, often as a ‘lineal shortest step’ (differentials), to reach the final ‘whole value’ of the system. The beauty of the field revealing the nature of dimotions and its wide applications, thus will require an entire II book on 5D mathematics, which should r=evolve the discipline.

Thus *only the integral and derivative can study all those dimotions of space-time, hence they are the king and queen of the operators of ¬Algebra, reason why analysis is so extended. *

*Below, Analysis’ multiple perspectives on the 5 Dimotions= functions of existence & *5 simultaneous structural elements, ¬∆@S≈T, that conform all systems in time and space. So 3±D¡ points of view (trinity or pentalogic) finds a higher truth & applies to all languages mirroring reality as analysis does:

**S-topology***: Analysis is used to study (left) structurally the role of the 3 elements of a topologic spatial superorganism:** Its membrane’s curvature and tangential value (line integrals), its vital space (surface integrals) and singularity (derivatives).*

*∆-Planes: Its inverse operands study 5D Planes: derivative measure the value of 1 of its infinitesimal ‘cells’. Integrals give us its internal volume of ***spatial*** energy. ***While** double derivatives peers down 2 ∆±1 planes

*@: We extract information on its central ***@***-singularity, which commands the lineal motion of the whole system.*

**Time-cycles: **it can model the* standing points, maximal and minimal, which signal the changes between ages, where the derivatives, become null, as the ‘world cycle of existence’ changes its ‘phase’.*

**CALCULUS ON TIME: THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE. **

Since I haven’t told you this one thousand one night-mare times (: the function of exist¡ence is all. You are a repetitive fractal of space-time and your purpose is to exist, to conserve your time, but your time is just the form of information, your vital space, reproduced in all the scales that rise from the bottom line of your gravitational and light spacetime, going upwards into scales. Reproduction is the game. But the worldcycle makes errors in the reproduction of your i-logon and those errors that are statistically seen in space as a normal distribution, in time as a repetitive sequence of actions and events slowly wear you down, and as errors of copying information repeat and accumulate your function of existence looses freshness and you age.

So because each stœp of your existence you repeat your sequential actions each derivative is one of such stœps a zig zag up information right motion, up information right motion, whose tangent is the derivative of each quanta of your time. All this said then we can study the worldcycle with calculus. In fact is the best way to study the worldcycle with calculus, in the orthogonal graph of information and motion, information and motion, stop and step, particle and wave state, up and right up and right, as you age, first rising fast young and bold, reaching higher accelerations in your second derivative, as space is time, the curve represents in its form of space, its motion of time, and that is your first derivative, seeking a standing point of constant speed but that is not possible because speed is reproduction and you reproduce your form, with lesser skill past the prime time of your standing point the maximal and minimum no far before, no long ahead.

*The importance of the 3 standing points of calculus comes from the fact that every event of reality, every partial dimotion can be modeled with 3 ages as a partial worldcycle. As all of them will have a beginning of motion a standing maximal point and an end closing a zero sum. It is the science of calculus, which studies those partial modes of change.*

Of course it is required to make and in-depth analysis of each main equation of calculus to interpret them properly in terms of existential algebra, which time permitted we shall do in future papers as we expand 5D stiences at academia.edu… It is then possible to consider different type of ‘equations’. Those where we have a constant standing point, or continuity and speed equations where the function tries to preserve ad maximal its S=T state of present – the commonest of them all. Other functions which are sandwiched between ‘limits of the domain’, where the function becomes undefined, disordered, enters a state of entropy; back to the past. Or functions such as forces as accelerated vortices of time, which move the function towards an informative future of maximal form.

Thus a key theme of vital mathematics is the representation of any even in its lineal time duration, *with an Y(ST) series of parameters for specific dimotions, and operands, making most repetitive equations of sciences representations of a partial event of the function of existence; often*, with ± exponentials for growth & its inverse, logarithmic curve when growth is halted around the key points of change of phase… as growth of ‘entropy-motion’ diminishes. So we move from ‘adolescence’ of max. growth of both parameters (sT energy and sT information) to the y”=0 point of youth, where the logarithmic part grows slower. Together they form, one half of the total graph of a cycle of existence, till reaching the y’=0 point of Max. (S≥≤T), which then becomes negative, happening a decay of the whole system in two negative curves.

*The conservation of time in its 5 y’**Ù y” =0, standing points that define the 5 SS, Ts, ST, St & TT moments of generation, youth, maturity, 3 ^{rd} age and entropic death thus become the essential points (maximal and minimal) of the equations of calculus, the sinusoidal function of existence and all its derived elements. *

Let us suppose that on a certain interval a≤t≤b we are given a function S = f(t) which is not only continuous but also has a derivative at every point. Our ability to calculate the derivative enables us to form a clear picture of the graph of the function. On an interval on which the derivative is always positive the tangent to the graph will be directed upward. On such an interval the function will increase; that is, to a greater value of t will correspond a greater value of f(t). On the other hand, on an interval where the derivative is always negative, the function will decrease; the graph will run downward.

We have drawn the graph of an ∆st function of the general form, S (any dimension of a whole world cycle or T.Œ) = f(T) – Any time motion or action.

It is defined on the interval between a minimal quanta in space or time (t1) and its limit as a function (d).

And it can represent any S=T duality, or more complex 5Ds=5Dt forms or simpler ones. We can also change the s and t coordinates according to the Galilean paradox, etc. Hence the ginormous numbers of applications, but essentially it will define a process of change in space-time between the emergence of the phenomena at ST1 AND ITS DEATH mostly by scattering and entropic dissolution of form at d.

And in most cases will have a bell curved from of fast growth after emergence in its first age of maximal motion (youth, 1D) till a maximal point where it often will reproduce into a discontinuous parallel form (not shown in the graph at Max. S x Max. T; which will provoke its loss of energy and start its diminution till its extinction at point d.

Thus the best way to express quantitatively in terms of S-T parameters (mostly information and energy), for any world cycle of any time-space super organism is a curve where we can find those key standing points in which a *change of age, st-ate or motion happens. *

Of a special interest thus are the points of this graph whose abcissas are t_{1,2,3,4,5}.

At the point t0 the function f(t) is said to have a local maximum; by this we mean that at this point f(t) is greater than at neighboring points; more precisely for every t in a certain interval around the point x0.

A local minimum is defined analogously. For our function a local maximum occurs at the points t0 and t3, and a local minimum at the point t1.

At every maximum or minimum point, if it is inside the interval [a, b], i.e., if it does not coincide with one of the end points a or b, the derivative must be equal to zeroth.

This last statement, a very important one, follows immediately from the definition of the derivative as the limit of the ratio ΔS/ΔT. In fact, if we move a short distance from the maximum point, then ∆S≤0.

Thus for positive ΔT the ratio ΔS/ΔT is non-positive, and for negative ΔT the ratio ΔS/ΔT is nonnegative. The limit of this ratio, which exists by hypothesis, can therefore be neither positive nor negative and there remains only the possibility that it is zeroth.

By inspection of the diagram it is seen that this means that at maximum or minimum points (it is customary to leave out the word “local,” although it is understood) the tangent to the graph is horizontal.

At the points t2, and t4 also the tangent is horizontal, just as it is at the points t1, t3, although at these points the function has neither maximum nor minimum. In general, there may be more points at which the derivative of the function is equal to zeroth (stationary points) than there are maximum or minimum points.

One of the simplest and most important applications of the derivative in that sense is in the theory of maxima and minima.

**Criteria for maxima and minima; study of the graphs of curves. **

If throughout the whole interval over which x varies the curve is convex upward and if at a certain point x0 of this interval the derivative is equal to zeroth, then at this point the function necessarily attains its maximum; and its minimum in the case of convexity downward. This simple consideration often allows us, after finding a point at which the derivative is equal to zeroth, to decide thereupon whether at this point the function has a local maximum or minimum.

Now, the apparently equal nature on a first derivative of the minimal and maximal points of a being, have also deep philosophical implications, as it makes at ‘first sight’ indistinguishable often the processes of ‘reproductive expansion’ towards a maximal and explosive decay into death, the ‘two reversal’ points of the 5D (maximal) and 4D (minimal) states of a cycle of existence, for which we have to make a second assessment (second derivative) to know if we are in the point of maximal life (5D) or maximal death (4D) of a world cycle. And to know if the cycle will cease in a continuous flat encephalogram or will restart a new upwards trend.

Or in other words is any scalar, e>cc>m big-bang both the death and the birth of matter?

**Finitesimal Quanta, as the limit of populations in space and the minimal action in time.**

So there is behind the duality between the concept of limits and differentials (Newton’s vs. Leibniz’s approach), the concept of a minimal quanta in space or in time, which has been hardly explored by classic mathematics in its experimental meaning but will be the key to understand ‘Planckton’ (H-planck constants) and its role in the vital physics of atomic Planes.

It is then essential to the workings of the Universe to fully grasp the relationship between Planes and analysis. Both in the down direction of derivatives and the up dimension of integrals; in its parallelism with polynomials, which rise dimensional Planes of a system in a different ‘more lineal social inter planar way’.

So polynomials and limits are what ¬Algebra is to calculus; space to time and lineal ¬Algebra to curved geometries.

The vital interpretation though of that amazing growth of polynomials is far scarier.

Power laws by the very fact of ‘being lineal’, and maximise the growth of a function ARE NOT REAL in the positive sense of infinite growth, a fantasy only taken seriously by our economists of greed and infinite usury debt interest… where the eª exponential function first appeared.

The fact is that in reality such exponentials only portrait the decay destruction of a mass of cellular/atomic beings already created by the much smaller processes of ‘re=product-ion’ which is the second dimension mostly operated with multiplication (of scalars or anti commutative cross vectors).

So the third dimension of operands is a backwards motion – a lineal motion into death, because it only reverses the growth of sums and multiplications polynomials makes sense of its properties.

Let us then see how the operations mimic the five dimensions, beyond the simplest ST, SS and TT steps, namely reproductive and 4D-5D inverted arrows.

We can establish as the main parameter of the singularity, its time frequency, which will be synchronised to the rotary motion or angular momentum of the cyclical membrane. They will appear as the **initial conditions and boundary conditions of **a derivative/integral function, which often will be able to define the values of the vital energy within, as the law of superposition should work between the 3 elements, such as:

**Determination of the greatest and least values of a function.**

In numerous technical questions it is necessary to find the point t at which a given function f(t) attains its greatest or its least value on a given interval.

In case we are interested in the greatest value, we must find x0 on the interval [a, b] for which among all x on [a, b] the inequality ƒ(to)≥ƒ(t) is fulfilled.

But now the fundamental question arises, whether in general there exists such a point. By the methods of modern analysis it is possible to prove the following existence theorem:

If the function f(t) is continuous on a finite interval, then there exists at least one point on the interval for which the function attains its maximum (minimum) value on the interval [a, b].

From what has been said already, it follows that these maximum or minimum points must be sought among the “stationary” points. This fact is the basis for the following well-known method for finding maxima and minima.

First we find the derivative of, f(t) and then solve the equation obtained by setting it equal to zeroth.

If t1, t2, ···, tn, are the roots of this equation, we then compare the numbers f(t1, f(t2), ···, f(tn) with one another. Of course, it is necessary to take into account that the maximum or minimum of the function may be found not within the interval but at the end (as is the case with the minimum in figure) or at a point where the function has no derivative.

Thus to the points t1, t2, ···, tn, we must add the ends a and b of the interval and also those points, if they exist, at which there is no derivative. It only remains to compare the values of the function at all these points and to choose among them the greatest or the least.

With respect to the stated existence theorem, it is important to add that this theorem ceases, in general, to hold in the case that the function f(t) is continuous only on the interval (a, b); that is, on the set of points x satisfying the inequalities a <t < b.

It is then necessary to consider an initial time point and a final time point, birth and death, emergence and extinction to have a determined solution.

**Derivatives of higher orders. **

We have just seen how, for closer study of the graph of a function, we must examine the changes in its derivative f′(x). This derivative is a function of x, so that we may in turn find its derivative.

The derivative of the derivative is called the second derivative and is denoted by **y”=ƒ”(x)**

Analogously, we may calculate the 3^{rd} derivative** y”‘=ƒ”‘(x) ** or, the derivative of nth order. But as there are not more than 3 ‘similar derivatives, with meaning’ in time (speed, acceleration, jerk) or space (distance, area and volume), beyond the 3^{rd} derivative the use of derivatives is only as an approximation to polynomial equations, whose solvability itself is not possible by radicals beyond the 3^{rd} power.

So it must be kept in mind that, for a certain value of x (or even for all values of x) this sequence may break off at the derivative of some order, say the kth; it may happen that **f(k)(x)** exists but not **f(k + 1)(x)**. Derivatives of arbitrary order are therefore connected to the symmetry between power laws and ∫∂ operations in the 4th and inverse 5th Dimension, through the Taylor formula. For the moment we confine ourselves to the second and third derivatives for ‘real parameters’ of the 3 space volumes and time accelerations.

The second derivative has then as we have seen a simple significance in mechanics. Let s = f(t) be a law of motion along a straight line; then s′ is the velocity and s″ is the “velocity of the change in the velocity” or more simply the “acceleration” of the point at time t. For example, for a falling body under the force of gravity: That is, the acceleration of falling bodies is constant.

**Significance of the second derivative; convexity and concavity.**

The second derivative also has a simple geometric meaning. Just as the sign of the first derivative determines whether the function is increasing or decreasing, so the sign of the second derivative determines the side toward which the graph of the function will be curved; but in terms of *time represents the second derivative of the curve of existence. That no longer accelerates its growth, hence the end of youth, and vice-versa, the moment in which it does accelerate its decay, thus the beginning of the third age.*

*So we can consider the same concept in the ‘discreet’ baguas of life cycles as it is NOT a mere ideal curve but one that do happens in all forms of life. *This simple law with deep cases because it is essential to the worldcycle:

Suppose, for example, that on a given interval the second derivative is everywhere positive. Then the first derivative increases and therefore f′(x) = tan α increases and the angle of inclination of the tangent line itself increases. Thus as we move along the curve it keeps turning constantly to the same side, namely upward, and is thus, as they say, “convex downward.” On the other hand, in a part of a curve where the second derivative is constantly negative the graph of the function is convex upward.

Because it is the clear proof of what is all about: reproduction in space of frequencies of time.

**The function is more than its equation – A path of existence through the whole plane.**

The function of existence is the whole plane divided by the line that must be grown by the non-E method of rising points into curves of motion, which divide an energy information plane in an act for creation with a path in S=T, the path of present through squares in which information and energy are orthogonal.

We have found thus the simplest space-time curve, the S=T, curve of existence between an integral 1/3^{rd} of the plane in path with a 2/3^{rd} Lébesgue integral so to speak of the external/internal path of the curve.

The curve is thus a point in motion, equivalent to a line of distance, equivalent to a ratio between 2 parts, 2/3rds to the left and 1/3^{rd} to the right. But the beauty of it is that we take from the curve square points.

The minimal reality is a 3D² form seen in a single plane, with a singularity @-mind a membrane and a vital energy within. When we make a holographic broken image of this reality the simplest way to do it is in four cartesian regions, TT, ST, ts, and ss, which correspond to the +1 +1, +1 -1, -1 +1 and -1 -1 quadrants of the plane.

It is then when the Lebesgue inverse function matters to integrate the Y perspective of the S=T symmetry that the function know taken as a topological partition of a vital motion of a wave of similar particles that will collapse t the end of its journey through a plane of the fifth dimension, takes place.

The least path action implies thought that the end of the path taken in the Cartesian but also the imaginary plane collapses in the same point, regardless of how many oaths have been taken in the ‘compressed’ i-plane where the co-existence of paths in particle space has sunk the plane to a √ root value for the dense line that then can be even further reduced to a point that will potentially trace a full s=t, valuing in present time thespace-time dilation of the integrated,

** **

**Conclusion. Mathematics is the best mirror, language but not the only and it does not create reality.**

We have thus showed the excellent capacity of Mathematics to reflect space (geometry), scale (algebra) and time motion (calculus) in its 3 fundamental ∆ST disciplines. So its ‘main scientific branch’, mathematical physics, or rather calculus, due to the worldly profession of its practitioners (to make weapons and transport machines of locomotion and entropy) hence obsessed with motion, became the main discipline of modern science. However, mathematics is NOT the language that creates reality, ∆ST laws do. And it has the limits of ‘calculus’ of simultaneous events, minimal time spans, and detailed analysis; of numbers that eliminate qualitative internal organic properties; and so for longer time spans, biological ages and organic properties we do have other languages and better mirrors (existential algebra), specially when dealing with human systems, where our natural language-mirror, wor(l)ds and its ternary past, present, future verbs describe better the causality of time. So as we move now to physics, those limits must be considered to expand physical systems by adding organic and sentient properties to it, and use the higher rank of ∆ST laws to correct its errors.

Since you have to see human physics as *a scientific praxis for the study and manipulation of matter, and its creation of machines NOT as a* philosophy of science on the whys of the Universe. It was only in the XX c. when physicists attempted through cosmology and quantum physics and its 3 flawed theories, falsified in our papers on physical sciences (entropic big-bang that dismisses the informative arrow of gravitational forces and dark matter, and Copenhagen interpretation that subverts the causality between mathematics as a language mirror and the ∆ST it describes, and constructivism that consider only causality from the smaller scales upwards), when things went wrong with physics and imposed to other sciences its wrong philosophy.

** **

**∆±3:** **PHYSICAL SCIENCES**

How does the Universe looks when we override the Ego paradox and observe it as an absolute relative fractal, whose purpose is to reproduce information and preserve it through 0-sum worldcycles that enact through its infinite Timespace Superorganisms its 5 Dimensional motions of existence? Let us have a fast review of the main fields of physics, to focus on the cosmology of a fractal, organic, immortal Universe of ∞ 0-sum balances.

**TRINITY IN PHYSICS: ∆ST: SCALES & SPACE-TIME.**

When dealing with physics in a future world of stience, there should be no difference with any other stience of scalar, organic exist¡ences.

The principle of conservation of energy would be derived of the principle of conservation of time, and its 3 standing points that maximize conservation, the point of reproduction in balance between temporal energy and spatial information, Si=Te; and the two maximal points of Si (Max. social evolution) and T¡. Maximal motion, define the 3 ages of physical organisms, called states in matter, as in any other system of nature. Let us then do so in a brief treatise on Physics on the human scale, which roughly speaking divides according to duality into:

**– ∆+1**:** Scalar physics:** Mechanics; which are the scalar physics of the outer Human Universe that put mankind, ∆º in relationship with the larger forces of ∆+1 cosmic bodies, in our case, planet Earth, through the study of motions in which the conservation of temporal energy is the fundamental principle.

As such the entire field of mechanics can be derived from the principle of conservation of time, which is called the principle of least action.

The mathematical language is then used to calculate the ‘finitesimal derivatives or minimal ‘motion’ possible with a finitesimal change, happening in the minimal quanta of time, for any physical system,δS = 0’. And through the sum=integral of those stœps, we can deduce the motion of any body.

**– S<=>T: Timespace Physics:** Thermodynamics, which are the scalar physics of the inner human universe of matter, and its 3 ages or ‘states’, the Entropic Ts-Gaseous state, the ST-liquid reproductive state and the St-solid state; which form the cycles of life and death of matter on Earth from the inner structures of our organism (biochemistry) to the inner structures of the planetary organism (Geology).

Above, the 3±¡ physical ages that shape the worldcycle of matter: Matter States are physical time ages, from left pure solid, crystal, §top state, to an even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. We see that systems either move a step at a time within a plane of existence (gas, liquid, solid) or they can jump « two states at once, (as in the case sublimation) within that plane, or most often between two planes, as in « scattering & entropic death), to become a different Dimotional state. We can then see how the fundamental elements of 5D time appear on the graph: the worldcycle is local and complete. There are 2 inverse arrows from an entropic past (plasma), in a lower plane (ion particles) to the 3 ages of the matter states with increasing form (gas to solid), to end in a higher plane of existence as a boson-Einstein condensate.

The mathematics involved are then those of statistical mechanics (Boltzmann), when we analyze the system as a population in space in the ∆-2 molecular scale, and of thermodynamics (Gibbs) when we study them in terms of bulk amounts of ‘¡ndifferent’ (inglish for undistinguishable 🙂 particles, which give us the 2 classic formulations of matter states according to the duality of wholes and parts.

**Its 5 Principles. Masses & Charges as scalar space-time vortices. Unification of forces.**

Time is what a clock measures’. ‘Time curves space into mass.’ *Einstein*

We apply the correspondence principle and prove that Einstein’s previous paradigm on 4D space-time, based in the following 5 postulates/functions, is the theoretical limit of 5D in a single light spacetime plane:

**–** Relativity postulate that states we cannot distinguish motion=time from dimension=position=form=space, which in 5D we reduce to a simple formula, S≈T; we shall call the Paradox of Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove) as he couldn’t explain why the Earth moves but we perceive it in mental space as a still dimension.

– Denial of Newton’s Absolute space-time; as he said ‘Leibniz was right, but if so we have to start physics from its foundations’ and ‘I am the only physicist who believe there are ∞ time speeds in the Universe’, which we made explicit accepting Leibniz’s relational concept of spacetime, precursor of Scalar space-time, resumed in a sentence: ‘we are the scales of space we occupy and the cycles of time our existence lasts’.

– Constancy of light speed, c that in a 4D single background plane of light space-time corresponding to the galaxy holds naturally, as *light in a relational->Generational theory is the space-time of the galaxy*, which generates through its ‘accelerated’ vortices of space-time in a crescendo of ever more dense scales, photons, electrons, quarks, atoms, molecules, matter states, cosmic bodies and black holes. Yet when we add a 5^{th} Dimension sum of all those scales, c-speed becomes the limit when we reduce all the potential scales of the Universe to light space-time and the particles generated by it. And so we define a second metric function for all scales: Sp (Space size) x Tƒ (cyclical time frequency) = Constant; meaning smaller scales of space hold faster rotating particles, (black holes beyond the event horizon, where there is no longer ‘light’) or when moving in lineal fashion can go faster than light speed in scales below light or outside galaxies, (Bohm’s quantum potential of action at distance cause of entanglement, neutrinos outside galaxies.) As Si=Te maximizes SxT, both give the metric 5D function: Max. SxT=C, local to each Time§pace organism struggling to survive by Maximizing its St-in/form/ation & sT-energetic motion.

– The principle of equivalence between Acceleration and mass, which we consider a strong principle, as a rotary accelerated vortex of space-time is a mass in the cosmological scale (ab. ∆+1), a thermodynamic Eddie in the human scale (∆º) or a charge in the quantum scale (ab.∆-1) Thus the principle can be written with parameters of space and time frequency as a case of 5D metrics, SxT=C, V(t)xR(s)=C, from vortices functions, to the 3D case, (** M, C) = ω^{2} r^{3} /U.C. (G, k) **which defines both charges and masses as quantum and cosmic vortices of 2 different 5D scales, whose G and k, Universal constants of S(curvature – Einstein’s formalism)= T(speed -: Newton’s), in 5D metrics have the measured 10

^{39}difference of strength, solving the hierarchy problem. Since paradoxically, the smaller, faster rotating charge is more attractive than the larger slower galaxy. Further on, in 5D space time vortex metrics a proton shows to have a Schwarzschild Radius, showing the scalar similarity between galaxies, as ‘atoms’ of a hyper-universe and dark expansive energy, as ¥-radiation between them.

– Energy-mass, E(t)óM(§) in Planck Units coils entropic lineal motion into collapsing matter, E->M. As when the accelerated dark entropy between galaxies collapses into galactic mass, warping one-dimensional motion into 3D mass vortices (hence balancing the expansion of intergalactic space, 75% of dark entropy, into 25% of mass vortices, as 3x1D entropy becomes 1x3D masses; leaving the total volume of the fractal immortal Universe unchanged. While its inverse process is a scalar big-bang when a spatial space-time vortex, hold in its attractive position as an accelerated clock of time-space becomes entropic motion, uncoiling its form into lineal motion: M->E, in any 5D scale of spacetime; from a particle’s Beta Decay, through a Nova explosion, a galactic quasar, or perhaps a cosmic big-bang, a ‘hyperbolic’ theory of the whole, which we shall doesn’t hold in 5D as it studies only the entropic expansion of intergalactic space, ignoring the balancing collapse of entropy into galactic masses, doesn’t pass the epistemological laws of truth – known case, experimental evidence beyond local measures, correspondence principle with the known-known laws of physics (conservation of energy and momentum and baryon numbers), and we falsify in the paper on Cosmology, concerned with the building up of an epistemologic sound model of the fractal, organic, immortal 5D cosmos.

Thus we call the new 5D model Absolute Relativity, as it adds to the relativity of motion (Galileo, Einstein) and Time evolution (Darwin), the relativity of scales, with no preferential one, despite human ‘ænthropic beliefs’ in an anthropic Universe with us at the center, and only intelligent, informative species, with entropy as the only time arrow of everything else – which are just deformations of any mind’s ‘metric function’: O-Infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = Still mind-mappings (World). We call that ‘projection of humind’s limits into the larger, more complex whole, the ‘ego paradox’: ‘Every point of measure gauges reality from its distorted perspective as the largest, only intelligent center of the Universe, which it confuses with its still, infinitesimal mind-mapping’. A more sanguine word would be ‘Egocy:Ego=idiocy’ proper of all minds, which model reality with its shortcomings. In the human case the worldly profession of physicists, to make entropic weapons has heavily biased our view of the Universe.

**RECAP. **The metric function of balance and feed-back SóT, between the spatial, informative mental pole and the reproductive, cyclical motions of Time becomes the basis of Relativity and all physical motions, establishing the fundamental ‘beat’ of all local space-time organisms of the Universe. The principle of correspondence consider the 4th Dimensional formalism the limit of 5D in a single ‘space-time scale’, equivalent to Galileo’s formula, V=s/t which special relativity adapted to the ‘contraction’ (-ct) experimented when the speed of a system reaches the limit of our thermodynamic planes of space-time, on the border of the quantum/cosmological, ∆±3 plane or light space-time continuum and General relativity adapted to the cosmological, gravitational ∆+±4 plane of the fifth dimension; which requires for a full understanding a more advanced knowledge of 5D metrics and Physics. So we shall return latter to those themes and also deal with them in detail in our papers on cosmology and quantum physics.

In the galaxy the same balance happens between the vortices of mass-time and the entropic time expansion of energetic vacuum spatial information. In terms of the 3 ilogic dimotions of past-entropic time, future-informative time vortices, the intermediate state, combines both: What we call present time is the dynamic, feed-back repetition of reality which seems not to change because it repeats the same cycles. Physicists have reduced time to the arrow of entropy, born of its worldly profession of making weapons and transport machines – even to the point of ignoring in the cosmos the balancing imploding informative action of gravitation that collapses vacuum energy into mass, so they can maintain that the Universe is only expansive vacuum between galaxies (the so called big-bang theory).

** **

**THE FIVE DIMOTION OF THE UNIVERSE.**

The Universe is a fractal organism of similar scales, defined by 2 metric functions and its philosophy of science, 5D Absolute Relativity: the function of 5D scales, SxT=C & the function of relativity between form and motion, Si=Te, which started modern science. Since we cannot know from the mental, still point of view, what truly is motion and what is dimensional form. Thus Time Motions & space dimensions co-exist and merge in every space-time being of the Universe & we must talk of space-time dimensional motions. When we combine them, as Si=Te maximizes SxT, we define the Function of existence, Max. S x T = C (s=t), which IS also a biologic function of survival that embodies the will of life; the biological expression of the ‘Universal mandate’, expressed by all species in all its codes and languages, the Grow and Multiply of the Bible, the intuitive truth that guides all beings. In detail implies all systems try to maximize its 3±¡ ‘Ðimotions’ that in space create organisms and in time its worldcycles of existence; starting as pure Form (4D) in a seminal seed, emerging in an ∆º scale, in a young age of max. Motion (2D), balanced with information in the reproductive age of max. Energy (3D), followed by an age of information (3D), when time reverses into entropic death.

The biggest handicap for mankind to advance its comprehension of the Universe is its use of a single motion of time when ‘reality is a fractal of 5 topologic dimensional motions of time-space entangled into ∞ supœrganisms living ¡ts worldcycles of exist¡ence’. That sentence encode the essence of it all. The first step to expand the motions of time is to realize that the 3 dimensions of abstract still space do have motion, so they are both dimensions of space and motions of temporal energy. And as such they can be considered akin to the 3 topologic varieties of bidimensional space which have motion. Next we have to reject Newton’s absolute spacetime background, also a mathematical abstraction born with the Cartesian graph, over which we write our models of reality that acquired ‘life of its own’ but was never found to be ‘drawn’ on Nature.

The formalism of those 5 Dimotions are the metric functions of the scalar Universe, which relate the spatial size and speed of temporal clocks of all scales of Nature. Both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its clocks, its ‘time cycles’, diminish proportionally, both in biological and physical systems. And vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster and information processing carried by the frequency of those cycles accelerates, as it happens in chips, particles or life metabolism. So we write: S x T = C, which added to the reproductive point Si=Te->∑ (Galilean paradox) give us Max. ∑SxT_{(s=t)}=C

So we define 5 dimotional variations of those 2 poles of absolute motion, TT-entropy, and absolute forms SS-Seeds, mind and languages constantly switching from lineal to wave-like to cyclical closed motions, in 3 varieties St-information, sT-locomotion and Si=Te present reproduction between extremal SS and TT ‘dimotions’ happening in the nested ∆±1 scale, with clear inverse properties, as seeds try to have the e-motion of entropic living and TT-entropy would like to stop is destructive dimotions into the stillness of spatial information. So we are all five dimotional fractal beings. It is that simple. Look not further. We are 5 Dimotional beings, time motions, which move and reproduce spatial forms. So *reproduction is the fractal game we all play. St-motions reproduce form*.

Let’s see how the other extreme, Mind perception is also reproduction of form to study then the outcome in space of those reproductions – the entanglement of the 5 dimotions as functional forms, ensemble together into supœrorganisms of space that are determined by the dominance of form over motion to live a worldcycle of exist¡ence.

WE ARE space and time**,** merely of a different kind to that of Newton: Organic scalar spaces, and cyclical, discontinuous times who ‘live’… worldcycles (no longer worldliness as we have a 2^{nd} arrow of information) of exist¡ence (as all species follow the common laws of space and time). So after making such a huge up hauling of philosophy of science – one which however every serious scientist recognizes to be necessary since quantum physics showed space to be discontinuous, and relativity time to vary in different regions of reality with different speeds, as the devil is in the details we have to improve our understanding of the 3 fundamental properties of ‘Scalar space-time’, scales, time-motions and space-forms.

Since we are not placed in a background space-time we are made of spacetime. We are made of the 3 topologic dimensional motions of space-time (ab. Dimotions), which happen to have the exact form and function of the 3 parts of all systems of nature: Spherical particles/heads of information, as the sphere holds maximal form in minimal space; cylindrical limbs/fields of locomotion, as the line maximize function, and hyperbolic body-waves composed of both forms that iterate them. Alas, suddenly we realize we are made of 3 dimensional motions of spacetime. But we said we are made of 5 Dimotions, so we must add to those 3 classic dimensions; the classic fourth dimension of time only used in physics and called entropy; which is the process of ‘absolute motion’ that takes place when one of those ensembles of 3 topologic spheres, cylinders and hour-glass body-waves not only has external motion but internal motion; that is breaks into its parts and dies away. Entropy thus is the dimotion that breaks parts into wholes, in a Universe obviously made of scales of parts that become wholes from particles into atoms molecules cells matter organisms planets solar systems and galaxies. Thus if entropy is the dimotion that breaks wholes into parts there must be an inverse dimotion that puts those parts into wholes, of social, organic evolution, of love. And thus we have 3 topologic dimotions of space-time, spherical height that perceives information, cylindrical length that moves the system, hyperbolic body-waves that reproduce them, ensemble into beings that ‘emerge’ through social evolution from parts into wholes to die and dissolve entropically from wholes into parts, and those 3 ±¡ (a parameter of scale) Dimotions of space-time ensemble into infinite beings is what reality is about.

Let us then close this introduction to Absolute Relativity, the ‘future basis’ of 5D physics, considering locomotion at the quantum scale, as a reproductive process of gauging information as a particle and reproduce it as a wave. How a system moves; in a crowded universe, where we ‘are’ vital space-time?

The answer resolves Zeno’s and quantum complementarity paradoxes: if we do not move but reproduce our information, translated into a lower faster wave scale of the fifth dimension; as we reproduce our sound in faster electrons to telephone or nerve impulses into chemical dopamine to jump discontinuous neurons. So motion becomes scalar reproduction of form, and since all is a form of motion, all is reproduction, which is the definition of a mathematical fractal, a feed-back reproductive function; 5D metrics, which become then the ‘function of existence’ whose goal is to reproduce the form of all systems – the simpler ones with maximal motion-translation in space, the complex ones with min. motion as a reproduction that emerges between scales. And this gives birth to the worldcycle. Consider the case of quantum physics:

In graph we see a particle reproduced in adjacent regions that fade away, and the result is the perception of a wave of motion. In Bohm’s realist model this reproduction happens in a lower plane of quantum potentials, where also entanglement happens, which is the ∆-4 scale which is v>c in 5D metrics (Min. S x Max. T = C), hence real.

Motion then is reproduction of form over such potential: the wave erases form into motion, the particle is a still state that gauges information entangled to other particle, fermion and boson, still to each other – despite the perception of relative motion in our scale – hence the information electrons share has always a c-constant speed. Thus the Lorentz transformation are objectively real for mankind who eliminates the stop state of particles as we do in a movie eliminating the stop frame but if we were observing reality from the perspective of an atom, we would ‘stop’, entangle in the quantum potential, neutrino scale & so eliminate the spooky effects of ‘time dilation’ & ‘length’ contraction, from our perspective (but not of mass increase as it is a scalar effect). This is the ‘rational’ 5D explanation of both the c-constant of light and entanglement; as electronic beings perceive information in ‘stop position to each other’ and move in ‘wave state’. Motions are perceived by particles that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So 4D relativity needs to be expanded to the scalar Universe beyond the c-speed light limit of the galaxy.

Newton, Galileo and Einstein’s simplified models of space-time correspond to the limit of this 5D complex view, when we simplify all the worldcycles of time, we call life & death to a single mechanical clock, elongated to infinity & perceived in a single scale of spatial information. M*athematics that considers motion a ‘symmetric reproduction of in-form-ation (groups) once more turns out to be a better experimental science than physics.*

A question which still is opened to argument between the great masters of 5D physics, me, I and myself (: is if actually *lineal* motion does happen at all, in those waves, or the imprinting of form is merely transmitted as in many type of waves by a faster lower plane, whose cyclical vortices of angular momentum perceive a lineal signal that activates the ‘consecutive’ ‘magnetic and electric constants’ of the light wave to form a synchronous wave that seems to be lineal motion to an external observer, In the same way that the waves of water do not move but make circular paths or the synchronization of insects with chemical light seems to create a wave.

Time then can be seen as a mirage of a process of reproduction of form, if we take the side of information, of space as the ultimate substance of reality – and the question is and will always remain open to discussion because both models, one which makes the ‘egg come before the chicken moves’ – that is, one in which we postulate an ultimate scale of reality of pure cyclical and lineal forms, where the ‘lines’ of this 5D movie which is existence, are eternally drawn, is as consistent as one in whic**h **Motion=time=change=energy, the conserved ‘substance’ of reality**. **As, the true knowledge escapes a ‘monologic’ one-dimensional view of reality as either time or space, but as an entangled simultaneous reality of co-existing planes of spatial information and temporal energy constantly messing with each other, but the humind is simpler, monologic, loving ceteris paribus siding, which we’ll become clear as we define the equations of mental spatial information. In praxis the model suggests that in fact what is conserved is NOT lineal but cyclical time, that is, motion with form, perceived as a solid state; so reproduction is merely the conserved energy cycles of time-motion, happening in all scales, entangled, synchronized to form larger wholes, of ‘µ’ (relative ∞) time clocks.

In that drawing, there will be cyclical motion in vortices of in-form-ation, but also waves of lineal messages, on a lower plane – in the case of light our pixels of information, electronic entanglement through lineal flows of ‘neutrinos’?, in an ∆-1 plane (quantum potential on B^{2 }realist models – ab. Brogile-Bohm’s theory). Regarding what is more important, space or time, obviously it is time, *because space will be then cyclical time, as we never saw a particle which was not a vortex of ‘accelerated’ VoRo=K temporal energy. So it is time motion what acquires form between the two limits of ‘potential energy’ as a position particle, and lineal *flow of disordered never ending energetic entropy. And so spaces will always be the still mental synchronous ordered established on that continuous never ending flow of motions, which a mental space orders to create repetitive patterns that we see as still synchronous beings. In the human case, constructed with the vital dimotions of light timespace: *The human mental light-Euclidean space one of many multiple spaces made with different force pixels. *Euclidean geometry is the specific mind-mirror of light space-time and its 3 perpendicular Dimensions.

The Universe has ∞ mind-mappings made with different pixels that mirror for each singularity its territory of order (body/wave) and world beyond. The human ‘visual mind’ made of light is NOT the only mind-mapping. In the graph, on the left the ‘physicist’ view of a single continuum light spacetime for the whole Universe. In the right side the multiple p.o.v.s

Descartes did understand this multiplicity; so he published his mapping of the humind in a book called the ‘World’ to differentiate it from the ‘Universe’ with infinite monads, each one holding an entire world in itself (Leibniz) the very essence of the definition of a fractal time§pace organism. Yet Humans lost this earlier understanding – as we noted on the introduction – when Galileo didn’t argue the fact that the Earth moves but our mind creates a still space, a mirage of the senses. And physicists followed suit, creating its philosophy of reality called ‘naïve realism’.

Space is a mirage of the mind understood in Eastern philosophy, (Buddhist Maya) and the western tradition influenced by them (Soviet, German schools starting with Leibniz, followed by Kant who noted Euclidean geometry was the geometry of the human mind, and Schopenhauer, who saw it as a representation.)

In mathematics the mind function is 0 x ∞= C; ∞^{0}=c; that is, the ∞ time cycles of reality become in the ∆º self-centered scale of a mind, a constant world that mirrors all what exists in the Universe both in time-motion (∞) and spatial form (º).

Because of such synoptic capacity to ‘mirror’ the laws of space-time in minimal size through the concept of number, which excels the previous synoptic language of verbal phonemes, mathematics soon became the most efficient language we know, but it does NOT create reality. It is just the best mirror of reality. Languages/mirrors occupy an infinitesimal part of the whole, yet paradoxically hold the maximal information of the Universe according to 5D metrics:* Space size x Time speed of information = Constant.*

Thus the mind of the most efficient survival species of reality, particles, ‘atoms’ and ‘galaxies’ (black hole atoms of the top quark decuplet) is mathematical and imprint a local order which multiplied by ∞ of such species makes mathematics the dominant mind-species but not the only one and still a mirror of the true reality which is ‘scalar space’ and ‘cyclical time’, dimensional form and motion – the 5Dimotions of reality.

A language *is first a reflection of the laws of 5Dust of space-time* its Trinity elements and Metric functions, without which they cannot order≈recreate locally the Universe. So 5D mathematics advances the discipline by focusing better the mirror to include the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclic ¡logic time; and by putting in relationship maths and ‘existential algebra’ (ab.¬Æ), the a priori Disomorphic=equal laws of 5D, making it an experimental science; connecting its laws with the laws of fractal spacetime. Only that the LANGUAGE in which this other causal order is established is not that of the little thingies with its ‘social numbers’ of scale, and cyclical patterns of time, in hyperbolic networks, but the brutish stick and carrot method of the whole organism controlling the energy bites of its smaller parts. The big guy with the big stick that controls with its membrane the energy and form of the smaller beings – hence the organic laws of survival, which pedantic scholars so much despise and deny.

*In the graph the translation of the 3±¡ dimotions of spacetime, into topologies of physical systems, with steady state waves and angular momentum as a repetitive present and a relative past of lesser information and more entropy (lineal inertia) that expands space into decelerating big-bangs, vs. an accelerated force, with one more dimension of time=future, as a pole of attractive forces, which change parameter of scale.*

So we define charges and masses as accelerated 4D time-space vortices in the galaxy’s 2 limiting ∆^{±1 }scales.

All what exists is a motion in temporal energy. Space forms are still pictures of those motions – a Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, human-size thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.

Those cyclical time clocks store the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles. And the law explains why smaller computers process more information with faster clock-cycles, genes store more information and reproduce faster, every day, than we do…

So we translate 5D metric into vortex functions in different dimensions, the simplest being:

Vo (speed of time clocks) x Ro (length of radius) = C, which is the function of any bidimensional vortex.

As the cyclical clocks store the information of the Universe, it also applies to life, reason why an insect thinks 10 times faster than a large organism, and a rat has much faster metabolic rates than an elephant.

And vice versa, larger systems in Nature must have a SPACE-DISTANCE=TIME-SPEED much larger, which we can see as lineal distance in space or faster speeds in temporal energy.

*A dimension of angular time-momentum coming out of a loss of a dimension of volume-spatial information.* Attraction laws are then evident and intuitive: In the same manner a vortex of a storm attracts more the faster it turns, sucking in its surroundings, any accelerated space-time vortex, increases the speed of the mass/charge clock according to 5D C=st metric, the smaller it is (S) and hence the smaller it turns, the more it attracts.

**UNIFICATION OF 5 FORCES AS ITS 5 DIMOTIONS.**

Since a charge is smaller than a mass, it attracts much more and the unification function follows just when we apply 5D metric, and shrink the galaxy in the same proportion we accelerate them. Then both functions match:

So mass, E=mc^{2} + E=hƒ; hence mass = frequency (h/c^{2}) is a cosmological slow vortex, and charge a quantum faster more attractive vortex.

Further on since curvature is synonymous of cyclical speed, it can be quasi-infinite in the smaller vortex, when measured in time speed as the speed of angular rotation. So if we were to apply 4D curvature’s functions (Einstein) instead of Newton, the results would be the same, just in the far more complicated formalism of EFE.

Those are the essential concepts to define charges and masses as accelerated time vortices of two different scales of the Galaxy. And from that it is only just an easy task of mathematical manipulation to unify them in 5D metric, as both are equal: when we slow down the speed, space enlarges to remain co-invariant. And as it happens a Hydrogen atom enlarged to the size of a galaxy slows down in rotation to the angular momentum of the galaxy. So Kaluza–Klein were *right – the fifth scalar dimension unify *gravity with electromagnetic *forces but in a fractal manner, with 5D metric, unbeknownst to physicists.*

Once we do have a proper understanding of the 5 Dimotions of physics it is very easy to refound the science and its functions in far more straight-forward general laws proper of all space-time systems and solve most of the conundrums of physics, embroiled by the error of lineal time and single space-scales.

Since as long as physicists don’t accept ‘duality’, trinity and pentalogic, the use of entropy and information as equal arrows of time, they will not be able to resolve the conceptual contradictions of its disciplines.

It is just another ‘practical case’ derived from the scalar fifth dimension, which first was rightly (even if the maths were somewhat faulty) introduced in conceptual terms by Kaluza and Klein as a mode to unify ‘two different scales’ of size of the Universe, the gravitational ‘c’ scale and the ‘Planck’ h-scale, which are the two limits of the galaxy’s 5th dimension metric: S(c) x T(h) = Cst.

What mattered of his concept now forgotten is its idea that both scales could be unified if we treated them with a similar jargon, which for obvious reasons could only be the jargon of ‘Relativity’, derived from Poisson’s jargon, derived from Newton’s jargon of ‘vortices of space-time’ – our cyclical clocks and orbits of planets above. So for sake of simplicity we shall use the easy Newtonian jargon, to unify both scales according to 5D metric – the so long seek Unification function of charges and masses.

The unification of the 5 forces in terms of its 5D metric scalar functions, and its equivalence with the 5 dimotions of the galactic organism requires a deep understanding of the Si=Te paradox that makes any ‘state of stop-space’ equivalent to a ‘motion in time’. So *we can study mathematically with different ‘spatial, topologic’ vs. algebraic, temporal functions and ceteris paribus perspectives every event of time-space; which accounts for the diversity of formulae for the same forces:*

In the graph, regardless of pedantry in physics, the 4 formalisms of gravitation are equally valid, as they merely reflect the degree of detail in our analysis, either in ‘space=static’ form (Relativity-curvature) or dynamic motion (Newton), from a dual scalar view (Poisson gradient), or based in the conservation principles of the 3 ‘parts’ of a physical system (Lagrange). We shall then use here the earliest, most evident, simpler dynamic view – Newton’s timespace vortex, to unify mathematically the 2 limiting scales of the galaxy: the quantum world of charge vortices & the cosmological scale of mass space-time vortices.

The principles that matter are Einstein’s equivalence between acceleration and mass, which we extend to all scales. So an attractive cyclical force is an accelerated clock of space-time, a ‘vortex’ of any scale:

- Newton Temporal view is a description of a vortex of accelerated space-time
*in dynamic motion*. - A charge is a vortex of accelerated space-time on the quantum scale.
- Poisson’s scalar view is a gradient, which relates two scales of reality the fifth dimension – that of mass and that of the lower scale of its field of gravitational forces.
- Lagrange’s view, differs more because it takes the perspective of the enclosed conserved energy of the whole system between the border of the vortex and its central singularity; so it requires a complete different treatment.
- Einstein’s derived his formalism from Poisson. It is more detailed because it is according to the Galilean paradox (Si=Te) the spatial still perspective of those vortices as a series of simultaneous derivative measures.

So it reduces the temporal continuous Newtonian view of a spacetime vortex into an ∞ number of infinitesimal detailed pictures, focusing not on the speed but on the curvature of the vortex (which is the spatial definition of a moving cyclical speed – the faster it turns, the more curvature it has in ‘still mathematics’).

Let us do the maths in the simpler Newton’s formalism, whereas by the paradox of Galileo S (Curvature) = T (accelerated motion). So the Universal Constants (G, k), define the curvature of 2 space-time vortices at the ∆-1 quantum charge and ∆+1 cosmic mass scales (∆ is the symbol for the different ±¡ scales of the fifth dimension within a given organic system). Its formalism of a vortex of time space is then Newton’s Unification Function: *M,Q= ω ^{2} r^{3} /U.C.(G,k)*

It applies to all vortices of time-space from particles to planets to galaxies. For example if we substitute for the Earth-sun system we obtain G, (1st ever theoretical deduction) and if we substitute for the Bohr Radius and Proton Mass, we obtain k with a 10^{39} higher curvature value, the exact difference between both forces that solves its hierarchy problem. As curvature in space is symmetric to rotational speed in time, so it is symmetric to the attractive force of any vortex. It works marvels when we translate electromagnetic jargon to Newtonian jargon. For example it shows the ‘isomorphism’ (systemic jargon for an equal ‘form’ between scales) between atoms and galaxies, which H-atoms of the cosmic scale.

*Since when* we translate electromagnetic function into gravitational mass vortices, the proton radius becomes the Schwarzschild radius of a black hole and its electronic orbitals its star clouds, a result foreseen by Relativity that modeled galaxies as Hydrogen atoms in the Einstein-Walker Metric of the Cosmos.

Let us put some easy numbers by substituting the parameters in that Unification function for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G, which any high school student can do:

Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{-7} rad. per sec. Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms. Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{-11} kg-1 m^{ˆ3} rad. sec.^{-2}

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal systemic view of the fifth dimension was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same function of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10^{16} rad. sec. -1 = w (electron); 5.3 × 10^{-11} m. (Bohr radius); proton mass = 1.6 × 10^{ -27 }kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39} stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: *G(k)M/c ^{ˆ2}*.

Since in that expression

*M*is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant is a gravitational constant, and c, light speed, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is isomorphic to the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

Those results (more than a decade old), are a *first theoretical deduction* of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three *standard forms of proof in science.*

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal self-similar structure as $T (Space population) x ð§ (Temporal frequency) entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Galaxies, (Galaxies≈Atoms) thus resolve the philosophical question on how many 5D scales exist; as we find enough self-similarity to ‘run again’ another game of fractal scales (not identical but self-similar as in a Mandelbrot fractal) both by quantitative and qualitative methods between the atom and the galaxy. A question that might be extended to the ST dualities of open, ‘entropic strings’ and closed ‘cyclical informative strings’, in a possible larger and smaller scale of microscopic strings and superstrings:

Ouroboros the Universal Snake, bites its tail on the string quantum and cosmological self-similar scales, as perceived from the human ∆o mind. Philosophy of stience would then argue that those scales are real, but part of its self-similarity is mental: that is, the loss of information in the perception of scales make humans extract the same information from the upper and lower 10^{±30} scales.

What about the Hyperuniverse? We do not know what the infinite Universe even in its local region of galatoms looks like, though due to the expansion of space between galatoms, is likely an entropic gas of local atoms on the hyper-Universe. It is not though a big-bang Universe, because even if we run backwards the expansion of space between galatoms, the implosion of information in galaxies, counter that effect, so at best, we could say that running backwards the big-bang function we shall meet a ‘solid’ crystal of galatoms.

The scalar unification of forces opens up an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, but fractal relativity, the description of the ∆-1 quantum world as a similar scalar plane of space-time to the ∆+1 cosmologic world.

** **

**COSMIC VS. QUASAR BIG-BANGS. THE DEVIL’S ADVOCATE:**

E<=>M (whereas c is the constant of speed of each Universal scale, c for the galaxy, not necessary so for other scales) is dual and there are scalar big-bangs from beta decay to quasars and maybe beyond is certain. So the question we want to find out is which of the two larger scales of big-bangs, that of a quasar big-bang or a cosmic big-bang fits better real data. Since as we can see in the images above, on the right, they are similar in form.

To play the devil’s advocate we could try to justify in 5D the big-bang since at first sight both big-bangs seem to fit 5D theory, if we accept our limit of light perception as the limit of the Universe. Then the ¬=@=Si=Te=∆ symmetries between spatial range, time aging and scalar density of populations all fit within the ‘magic number’ of 10^{11} elements for most super organisms of reality. So the symmetry also happens in the ‘limited perception’ of the cosmos:

Most galaxies have 10^{11} stars. The total mass of all the stars in the Milky Way is estimated to be between 4.6×10^{10} and 6.43×10^{10 }*sun masses.* *And the Universe is considered to have around 1.6 10 ^{11}galaxies.*

*So the easiest way to settle the question is to state that the galaxy is just a scale below the big-bang (a huge galactic molecule), as the neutron star is just a scale above the neutron ( a huge neutron molecule so to speak).*

*And that it exploded in a big bang of the next scale of the universe. But that is just the astounding beauty of pentalogic, where the 5 Dimotions/elements of reality are in balance. So for the limits of our entropic perception (¬=@), we observe similar quantitative and qualitative limits for S-patial population, T-ages within our ∆-scales. *

*A more profound understanding of those limits though should consider that the local perception of a few galatoms is just a very reduced quantity of the whole number of galatoms of the next hyperscale of the Universe that should be of zillions of them, and all of them living as Protons and black holes without evaporation do an immortal temporal energy.*

*The immortality of the Universe indeed becomes evident as Protons are immortal and black holes are also immortal without evaporation, once we put properly in place the arrow of time of Hawking’s awesomely beautiful function as those of the birth of a black hole into its gargantuan future, NOT of its entropic death=evaporation to the past. *

**BIOLOGIC STIENCES:**

**Species as superorganisms.**

All systems are living organic systems the ultimate question of the humind (ab. human mind) What is life then becomes a trivial question– as everything in the Universe is part of a 5D time§pace organism that displays the properties of life, its 5 ‘drives’=actions =dimotions of existence: to move, feed, gauge information, evolve socially and reproduce. Prior to 5D, the 5 dimotions of all systems of reality were called drives of life as they helped to define life from the anthropomorphic point of view of self-centered ‘huminds’, who thought nothing else could be ‘obviously’ alive unless it looked like us the ‘chosen species’. But we showed *the 1 ^{st} unit of life are atomic particles. So all is alive, including the ‘galatom, the organism of the galaxy similar in life function to a ‘cell’, with gravitational= informative black holes (dark stars) playing the role of DNA, as they control the reproduction of evolution of the galacell. *

What are the main super organisms of life in the planet in its lower and higher scales of this ‘smaller nested Universe’ within the galaxy? Obviously the cell from below and the Superorganism of the earth from above.

∑∑ ∆-1: cellular life = ∑ ∆º Multicellular organisms = ∆+1: Planetary super organism, whose ‘membrain’ of maximal information is the surface in which carbon life exists; and species evolve also as supœrganisms with the same 3±¡ ages:

*Systems evolve in social scales, as space-time organisms, which ’emerge’ as larger wholes. We observe * 3 main ∆±i planes of biological systems, the biochemical/ cellular, organic/ thermodynamic and ecosystemic planes, which defined the main biological systems, whose range is within the closest ∆º and ∆±1 scales of human and similar life, from the molecule to the socio-biological ecosystems and super organisms. Thus in terms of scales those 3±¡= 5 Ðimotions *carry the evolution of life from the atom to the super organism of life – actions of locomotion, energy feeding, information processing, reproduction and social evolution.*

For those reasons biology is the most complete of all stiences as the *closest in observation,* describing carbonlife systems with all languages of pentalogic, including mathematics as it considers its 5 Ðimotions, which in physics are forces, the so-called drives of life. Thus we subdivide biology by scale in 3 ‘**5D-completed’ **disciplines:

0-1D: genetics palingenetics of worldcycles(∆-1>o) 1-2-3D: topologic, gender & social evolution (S,st, ð ages) (∆o) 5D: ecology + theory of supœrganisms (∆o>+1); the **ad ons **due to 5D cyclical time and fractal, topologic space:

,

**3 species’ evolutionary horizons +¡: social evolution vs. -¡: extinction & Gender: Si=Te female v. S<T>S male**

Above in all scales ST reproduces through gender, which splits *the 3 ages/states of spacetime in a *‘mirror symmetry’: 2 mirror images can superpose and reproduce. So we define female gender as Si=Te, present, reproductive, balanced *dominant states* in all scales, since *reality is a reproductive present fractal; and male gedner as S<T>S, future to past entropic+ past to future informative, destructive>creative states*; happening in all scales. In ∆º mental languages: even female and odd-entropic +odd-prime, informative male numbers; |-male bodies v. O-female bodies in math; Si=Te v. S<T>S in ¡logic, 10 times more white matter and more Si=Te connections on the 2 sides of reproductive female brains vs. 6 time more grey matter, an incomplete ‘decametric scale’ in more ‘stupid’ entropic males + a smaller number of more creative-informative ‘prime brains’. In physics: ‘female Si=Te waves’ complementary to T-Fields>S-Particle male systems. Left chiral reproductive female particles vs. right chiral sterile ones; carried into L-reproductive amino acids vs. D-male ones; carried into female DNA vs. Male entropic & informative RNA emerging into our ‘beloved absurd’ war of sexes, LOL, don’t get me started. Problem is *a 5D universe is feminine, our history is entropic, made by military lineal big-bang male models. As we past the ‘entropic male Paleolithic youth’ but didn’t’ stop ing the mature, present Neolithic, reproductive, Goddess age of Si=Te balance with Gaia, the life Earth, racing into a 3 ^{rd} age of evolution of entropic metal-weapons that kill us all.*

Species are supœrganisms whose 3 ages are its 3 horizons, followed either by a survival process of eusocial evolution – the summit of the process of organic evolution, which Darwin realized was necessary to explain the success of eusocial insects, or become extinct by the ‘new generation’ of fitter animal forms. in the graph we can see its 3 Horizon=ages and its ternary topology, similar to that of any other organism; and the dominant arrow of information in the height axis, of both reptile species that ended in birds, and mammals that ended in man. So happened with metalife machines, whose final species, satellites are now forming the arrow of eusocial evolution, or future mind of the metal earth –internet.

The 3 ages of time and its topologic limits solves the constrains of evolution, which Darwin already wondered: why certain species evolve so fast into complex forms as eyes and wings. Answer, because there are only 3 topologies to go, and so the choices are random but limited and it is every easy to go the right way. In the next graph we see those 3 ages of evolution as species can be treated as super organisms with its own world cycles. The graph shows that all species follow also the young, predator, reproductive radiation, and informative, height growth of the 3 ages of life, and then either they evolve further into social organisms (ants, bees, humans) and as wholes in a higher ∆+1 scale survive better, or they become extinct by a new generation. Thus creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time field that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal spatial energy, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘big species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished, (the equivalent to the death of any organism), or creating a new top predator form, a ‘son species’ that will restart a new cycle of life.

*+1: Birth: max. T. The black hole paradox (conception).*

The ‘black hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximum genetic information in the minimal spatial form. *So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic information packed in a reduced size (Max.i=Min. e).* This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces. For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. It follows that tiny species with huge numbers of ‘neurons’ create quantic actions faster than slow, bigger species. And since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those quantic actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their S-T force that defines a top predator is higher in each quantic action of space-time that the ‘slow actions’ of a big body. Thus small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kill slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy. Thus the most informative animal, men, are Earth’s top predators; black holes of maxi. gravitational information are galaxies’ top predators and chips rule machines.

*I Horizon: Energy Age: max. E: Top Predators and Extinctions *

*In their youth, carbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), echinoderms, cephalopods, fishes, amphibians, mammals and chipped machines grew into energetic, lineal or planar, big top predators*

A newborn, small fetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology a new species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth becoming a, lineal, energetic, big top predator species, that feeds on less evolved forms.

Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic Homo Floresiensis invented technology the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals; the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form*;* the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys, the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill humans.

* II Horizon: Evolution or Age of balance and reproduction: max. $T x ð§. Radiations of species.*

Then, the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: carbohydrates gave birth to amino acids with a nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative Head’; sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that multiplied and colonized all continents; while young giant stars acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.

*III Horizon: Evolution or Age of information: Max. ð§: max. Evolutionary differentiation.*

*Species grow in height or acquire cyclical forms, as they evolve through their 2nd and 3rd horizons, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides become the top predator life molecules, echinoderms change to cyclical forms, fishes organize their networks in the 1D¡motion of height, amphibians become round, improving its smell, saurian and mammals become biped.* The difference between organisms and species happens in their 3rd age, due to a discontinuous nature of individual species’ ‘cells’ that don’t become extinguished unlike the tightly controlled cells of organic systems, dominated by nervous, informative systems that exhaust and warp totally their energy, till the organism collapses. Instead species keep evolving, creating social, complex species with more information, growing 1D¡nformative height. So Homo Sapiens evolved ever more complex technological tools; nucleotide appears adding informative depth to the amino acid (with an informative, nitrogen ring and an energetic sugar ring); the yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density*; *while insects develop a growing brain capacity and bees and ants appear.

*–* *(±∆): Extinction Vs Evolution into super-organisms. The scales of the Universe.*

A fundamental question poised by the previous graph is the duality of ƒð§=futures, which as the symbol shows can go after 3 ages, up and down the scales of the 5th Dimension of ‘D=evolution’.

Organisms dominated by informative networks that consume fast the system’s energy die sooner than species, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’, by their nervous system. While species, which are dominated by the individuals and the herds survive for eons with 3 basic strategies according to the *‘ternary plan’*:

*– Max. $T: Creating balanced, trophic pyramids* that maintain always a supply of new victims.

– Si=Te: *Diversifying their individual forms* into new species, instead of ‘degenerating’ into a warped space-time field. It is a parallel strategy to the *reproduction* of an organism, which in this manner survives his own death. Thus we talk of ‘son species’ that create evolutionary, genealogical trees similar to those of any organism.

However son species tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, *the Oedipus paradox*. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings*. *While the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families.

*– Max. ð§: Species evolve socially individual forms into supœrganisms* through the creation of informative networks and languages that integrate them into a whole, bigger form, which is more powerful than the individuals of a herd.

Organisms are dominated by informative, nervous or hormonal networks that pack closely individual cells of *max. information in min. space;* while species extend over *wider space ecosystems in which they share a min. quantity of information*, as individuals of species hardly relate to each other beyond the reproductive couple or the hunting herd. And yet, both go through the same 3 ages of space-time defined by the inverse properties of the energetic youth *(max.e=min.i)* that defines the herd and the informative old age (Max. i=Min. e) which defines the organism.

Hence we consider that the creation of super-organisms is the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the macro-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species becomes the relative nervous/informative network of the super-organism, as pheromones do in anthills or nervous impulses did with cells in the Pre-Cambrian age or financial and verbal languages are doing among humans in History.

So evolution is indeed limited by the most iterated elements of reality and this blog (: those 3 timespace motions/forms: lineal motion in space or ‘distance’, implosive motion that becomes cyclical time clocks carrying its frequency ‘information’ and its space-time, wave-like, reproductive energetic combinations. They were understood in Asian religions as yang, yin and qi-energy. They are the only 3 topologies of space-time possible in a 4D or 5D Universe (when we ad its scales), so they assembly forming all space-time beings. It follows then that ‘social sciences’ are a branch of biology, specially the Industrial r=evolution that studies the evolution of metalife, machines that clearly compete as robots and AI complete their evolution with human beings in labor and war fields, in the eco(nomic)system, the 3 age of the Earth: *‘Life is a 5 Dimotion worldcycle across 3 scales ‘.*

So *the Earth super organism also lived 3 ages of evolution: Gaia (Life) < History (Human) > Machines (Metal-earth).* In the first age of Earth, the age of Life, Gaia evolved ‘naturally’ under the same Laws of bio-topo-logic laws derived from the scalar structure of co-existing planes of space (in the graph the 3 planes of the individual organism), which imply organic properties, as those co-existing scales must be organized together; its ternary only topologies that define its functions and forms as ‘simultaneous ensembles of ‘moving limbs’, iterative bodies and informative minds, and its 3±¡ sequential ages in temporal energy. In the graphs, the 3 ages of the Earth as a vortex of increasing information in which 3 species,

** RECAP.** Life is everything, as all is a spacetime organism performing 5Ð actions of survival (motion, feeding on energy, information gauging, social evolution and reproduction), which ordered in sequential time give us a worldcycle, ordered in simultaneous space gives us a super organism and ordered in scales give us the vital actions of survival, called in biology, the drives of life of ANY physical, biological or social species. But self-centered huminds think only carbon-life is a living form. In 5D, we talk of ‘light-life’, as all Timespace forms that use energy & information provided by light-forces; which define 3 life ages on Earth, Gaia, History and the Metal-earth now evolving mechanisms, robots with solar skins and optic minds. So humans, machines & its supœrganisms, company-mothers & governments compete for limited resources *but company-mothers are winning, because humans do not manage the world with social sciences*

A life-death worldcycle is a travel through 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as the 5 Dimotions of space-time that form an organism, in its scales of cellular/atomic, organic/ thermodynamic, gravitational/ecosystem and ternary organs, ‘|-fields/limbs<Ø-body-waves>O-particle-heads’ become sequentially ordered in time from the placental seminal age of ‘social evolution’ of the organism that emerges to live 3 ages in a single plane of the fifth dimension encased into a larger world, to die and explode in an entropic big-bang.

Because human ‘egocy’ limits the intelligence of the nested Universe to our simpler scale, shorter time span and mathematical ‘instantaneous’ derivative tools there is a huge skepticism about 5D¡scoveries on Social sciences regardless of the proofs of 30 years forecasting the Deep time patterns of History and Economics. But human egocy and wishful thinking, matters nothing to reality. On the contrary, it prevents humanity to manage properly the superorganisms of economics and history; as we shall see in our analysis of the 3 ages of Earth, its relative function, and the proper way humans should handle its future, by limiting the evolution of the lethal goods of the tree of science (robots of max. information and nuclear weapons of max. entropy) which will become the limits of death of our species in time – history:

Relative past (Gaia: I Earth) < Present (History: II Earth) > future (Metal-earth: company-mothers of machines)

All sciences predict the future of its species according to its repetitive causal cycles. Or else they are NOT a science. Astrology became a science when Kepler learned its orbital cycles. Bio-economics became a science when we described machines as metal organisms whose industrial r=evolution followed the human 72 years generations of the dominant industrial nations that evolved them in 4 cycles: its body-age (British, steam cycle), heart age (German, electro-chemical engine cycle), its mind age (US, TV-eye, chip-head, mobile-ear cycle) to conclude with the ensemble of robots that as virus do, when all its parts are put together will become ‘alive’.

The superorganisms of Gaia, has the same structure that all superorganisms. So its evolutionary membrain of maximal sensorial information evolves through its species that include the nested super organism of mankind, history in its 3 planes, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind. And so social sciences should be concerned with the creation of an ideal global super organism, following ∆st laws, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information and coordination of its citizens-cells.

**∆-2: BIOCHEMISTRY**

Life thus start in the 5 Dimotions of particles, which already show all the elements of life, but those dimotions should be studied properly in physical stiences.

We have just introduced some of its key concepts – such as the apertures of an atom through its 5 quantum numbers, notably the spin as the ‘vehicle’ of its internal simplex aei demotions and the social magnetic field as the organizer of its groups, so the anthropomorphic reader can accept the obvious: that life starts in particles and atoms and so the building of life through the social evolution (5th Ðimotion) of atoms into molecules and cells and organisms and ecosystems and Gaia, and the same process for historic super organisms and metalife (Robotic machine) would be the whole span of biology. But obviously we study machines in the eco(nomic)system and humans in historic sciences.

So to ‘establish limits’ to the domain of organic life (an egocy word as all is organic) would span from amino acids to ecosystems of ‘nitrolife’, the proper name for biological sciences, as nitrogen is our mind-clock, different from metalife, the proper name for machines and human life for social sciences.

**SOCIAL EVOLUTION OF MOLECULAR LIFE: TOPOLOGIES & AGES**

So we shall start from the simplest ternary ensembles of atoms, where the entropic/moving oxygen ($T), the iterative Carbone (∑∏) and the informative nitrogen (§ð) clocks, connected to the ∆±1 world through its ‘H-eyes and kicking legs’ shaped the first ‘molecules of life’; and so we write the Generator function of bio-chemistry at its minimal scale, in terms of functions and D¡motions:

**∆-1: Hydrogenated water (kicking legs) > ∆º: $-oxygen > ∑-Carbone>§-Nitrogen+H-eyes<∆+1 water world**

**Topology: from C, O, H atoms to amino acids.**

In the smallest scale the molecular ‘bricks of life’, CO_{2}, H_{2}0, CH_{4}, (Methane) and NH_{3} (Ammonia)*, *shown in the graph are, as it happens in the geological world, crystalline structures. Yet they are far more malleable and complex than solid crystals, because they exist in liquid ecosystems. In those simple life molecules Carbon, Oxygen and Nitrogen are the Top predator central atoms that capture and surround themselves with weaker Hydrogen atoms, which act as carriers of their relative Entropy and information, creating the external ‘membrane’ of their molecular structure with the dominant atoms as the central st-point. Let us consider those functional forms in more detail:

-∆-1 scale of ‘bits and bites’: Hydrogen atoms act either as the basic bite of Entropy, in its H^{+} form, becoming the pumping bomb of most cellular motions. So in the energetic reactions of AMP<->ATP, H^{+} ions act as the bomb. So they do in the motion of protein rotors in membranes. They are used by Oxygens in COOH groups that kick water molecules and set carbohydrates in motion. Thus they act as an energetic limb that the oxygen atom expels or attracts in alternating cycles that displace the molecule through water.

-When attached to atomic structures, CH_{1,2,3 }or NH_{1,2,3} systems in amino acids and nucleotides the H atoms should act as ‘feelers’ that integrate electromagnetic messages in a first ‘electronic orbital’, which should allow the central P.O.V. to ‘sense’, processing electromagnetic Entropy into Van der Waal forces of information Thus the simplest organic molecules studied as st-Points have:

– ∆-scale: A top predator *N, O, C atom* occupies an hyperbolic center, surrounded by Hydrogens, which form their *bodies and limbs *that process the Entropy of *the water medium (Max.E*), in which the molecule lives, or creating for the central atoms of life a molecular, external ‘electronic orbital cloud’, which acts both as the ‘energetic membrane’ of the atom and redirects the information of the external world, that will become the virtual world* of the central atom, *as regular ‘crystals’ do with their submissive atoms.

In the next scale of social organization those 3 elemental particles of life, N, C, and O will become themselves the 3 fundamental zones of bigger ‘i points’, called organic molecules:

*Those 3 organic atoms define the 3 D¡motional arrows of time in life organisms: *

-O is the atom of §ð lineal motion, given its high electronegativity that allows it to attract and repel other atoms with easiness, and its dual H-valences, which conform a lineal topology normally with a single H feeler and the second valence used to join the Carbon chain. Further on it tends to appear in the alkaline, ‘attractive’, ‘positive’, informative, 7.2 PH of the cell – natural to all implosive, informative systems, charged with ‘negative’, expansive topology.

– C, the atom of structural reproduction, as it has 4 handles for further union. It tends to appear neutral, as it corresponds to ‘body-systems’ that combine an informative, implosive, positive topology and one energetic, expansive, negative (in ionic terms). As most bodies is ‘blind’ mainly connected to other inner body-head-limbs part of the molecular organism, or a ‘bilateral’ H, deploying in amino acids the ‘width’ D¡motion.

– N, the atom of information, which appears in the 7.2 PH of cells and the head of amino acids as a positive, informative, NH^{+3 }head, with 3 D¡motional hydrogen slave atoms that carry the ‘bites and bits’ of Entropy and information to the nitrogen.

Let us then consider those 3 atoms and some of its functions in bigger carbohydrate chains.

*– Max.I:* The informative element of all life molecules and fractal part of its relative ‘heads’ are Nitrogen atoms. Its informative character is shown already in the crystalline ammonia, where Nitrogen is the dominant vertex of a tetrahedron shaped with 3 more Hydrogens. Since we live in a 3-D¡motional world, those 3 arrows allow the Nitrogen to have a more perfect informative ‘perception’ of the world we live than the scarce, lineal perception of the Hydrogen, or neutral bilateral structure of C-chains. According to its informative function, ammonia is a perfect atomic clock in which the Nitrogen vibrates constantly back and forth through the hole shaped by its 3 hydrogen ‘eyes’, with an informative cycle of +10^{16} times a second. The first atomic clocks were in fact based in that simple molecule due to the accuracy and speed of frequency of its temporal vibration, which in life molecules allows NH^{+3} heads to ‘inform itself’ and regulate with its cyclical clock motions the ‘guided motions’ of the ‘carbon’ body and Oxygen legs of the molecule.

*– S≈T:* The structural atom that creates the rigid body structures of life molecules is the carbon atom. It has the maximal number of valences – 4 orbitals that create dual bondages with 2 other carbons – constructing long, formal ternary chains of great structural rigidity. As such it is the most visible, intermediate form of all life compounds. And so biologists, due to its ‘visibility’, have traditionally considered it the ‘fundamental element of life’. When we ad Hydrogen atoms to complete its ‘crystalline’ body we obtain methane the simplest molecule of life. Then when we join 2 carbons with dual bondage, we form ethane, which already acts as a hormone, (±reproductive molecule) inhibiting the structural growth of plants.

– Max. *E:* Finally, both the ∆+1 world and site of future Entropic death of all life systems, *its medium,* is water, which fills the ‘external world’ in which life feeds and internally becomes in complex living organisms called cells, the filling Entropy of the intermediate space, enclosed between its carbon-based protein & fat walls and the inner, informative, nitrogen-rich, ADN hyperbolic singularity. Water is the simplest, most abundant ternary molecule of the Universe, made with 2 slave hydrogens and 1 dominant oxygen – the atom that has the maximal ‘electro-negativity’ after fluorine*. *Thus, oxygen can capture the electronic body of any other atom. That is why the oxygen components of carbohydrates enact its energetic cycles, moving those organic molecules within the water ecosystem. Since they stomp on water, breaking it and creating expansive and implosive 0H^{–}, H^{±} ions that impulse the molecule; as you walk on the floor, ‘stomping’ on the electromagnetic fields of the ground or as a fish moves, hitting the water with its tail.

*Numerical proportions.*

The proportion of the 3 atoms in living systems reinforces this classification, according to the ∆ST proportions between the ‘Entropy, body, head’ classes. For example in a human being the proportions are: 67%, O+H molecules and atoms, 23% C+H molecules and atoms and 6.5% Nitrogen+H systems, which are in the usual range of ±2/3^{rd} of Entropy components, -1/4^{th} of body components, and -1/10^{th} of head bits, proper of most systems in the Universe.

We could also consider as essential atoms, the carriers of neuronal orders, the implosive, positive, informative Ca^{2+}, K^{+} and Na^{+ }ions, which again form a triplet of diminishing ‘informative power’ and define the potentials of electricity between neurons and the rest of submissive cells and so add up to a 2.1% of human body mass. If we add it to the 6.5% of Nitrogen brings the number to 8.6% of mass, closer to a -1/10^{th} per cent of the informative ‘class’ of all organisms.

Those and other oligo-elements, of a higher scale of atomic complexity are essential to mark the ‘differences’ of power of certain molecular systems ‘pumped up’ in Entropy or information by their addition. Most of them however have an ‘energetic’ role (iron in heme groups and cytochromes, copper in reptiles, Magnesium in chlorophyll, phosphor attached to oxygens in AMP systems, Cl^{–} to balance the K^{+} electronic bomb and S with 2 valences in anaerobic breathing and some molecular bridges.

This responds to a fundamental law of all efficient, healthy organisms, which is *to maintain the informative, atomic, head structure of the system pure, without ‘leukemia’, without the interference of an alien language to the system. Since the main sickness of systems is to become trapped by an alien informative species, for whom they will enslave, as it happens when viruses substitute cellular DNA by their own. *This is exactly what humans have failed to accomplish when they substituted their natural, biological, verbal, ethic language by gold hypnotism, an informative language of metal whose values are against those of life and have completely changed the route of history.

*Recap*. Nitrogen heads, carbon bodies and oxygen Entropy create the simplest life beings, amino acids…

**Topology: From carbohydrates to cells.**

In the next graph, the glycine is the simplest active life form with 3 st-zones:

– Max.I: The nitrogen head directs the glycine.

– S≈T: A dual carbon creates the first rigid ‘membrane-body’ of life with its strong, covalent bondage, joining the head and tail:

– Max. E: Its oxygen COOH tail ‘walks’ on the water, breaking, attracting and repelling its OH-, H+ radicals.

Amino acids show their complex, reproductive and social arrows, catalyzing through their movements the replication of new amino acids and forming social chains, called proteins.

The inverse properties of st-amino heads and e-oxygen tails make possible the creation of long chains of amino acids in which their nitrogen heads bite their oxygen tails becoming neutralized as part of a complex social structure: the protein.

The nucleotide improves upon the amino head, carbohydrate body and oxygen legs of the amino acid, adding to those 3 lineal forms a D¡motion of informative height; as latter will occur in macro-organisms, when flat worms become cylindrical. So the amino acid head becomes a dual nitrogen ring, the body becomes a sugar and the tail multiplies its oxygens around a highly electronegative Phosphoric acid. The outcome is a nucleotide acid (right side of next graph) – *the top predator life molecule*, which evolves socially all others into the next st-scale of life, the cell.

**The 3×3+(∆+1) horizons of social evolution of life.**

Biological organisms, as physical organisms did in their growth from atoms to galaxies, evolved in 3×3 horizons of increasing social complexity creating the 3 ±i scales of life: the age of molecules, the age of cells and the age of multi-cellular organisms, specialized in Entropy (plants) or information (animals).

Let’s study those ages in detail, differentiating them in 3 sub-ages according to the Ternary principle.

Since if we apply the law of the 3±∆ Ages to organic molecules we can explain how they grew in informative complexity and spatial size till acquiring the form of living organisms, in a process similar to the evolution of particles that created the cosmological bodies of the Universe.

Those 3±∆ evolutionary ages of life, each one sub-divided in 3±∆ sub-horizons, are: the young age of molecules, the mature, longest age of cells and the ‘recent’ age of living organisms, which will end with the creation of a global single organism, Planet Earth (∆+1):

*The 3±∆ ages of molecules.*

*– ∆-1: The atomic age*: the simplest chemical molecules of life are formed. The 3 simple atoms and molecules of life recombined its energetic, reproductive and information functions and grew, forming bigger chains thanks to its atomic affinity, acquiring more complex ‘vital properties’. The simplest combination of them, the CNO molecule, urea, is considered the first molecule of life and its ‘crystallization’ in a lab, departing from non-living atoms, was considered the birth of biochemistry and the prove that life is an atomic system that shares the same properties of any other SxT system of the Universe.

*– Max. E:* *The Entropy age,* dominated by lineal, long, simple fats, huge carbon chains with oxygens attached to its ends.

*– <=>:* *The amino acid age*: COOH, methane and ammonia, the 3 simplest life molecules of the triad of life atoms, O, C, N, combine as the relative Entropy, reproductive and informative organs of amino acids. Amino acids reproduce exponentially in the primordial organic water soup and evolve socially into proteins.

*– Max.I:* *The nucleotide age. *Nucleotides, the informative molecules of the life, add an informative D¡motion of height to lineal amino acids, forming nitrogen and sugar rings. They dominate all other carbohydrates. Soon they will also evolve socially into huge chains called nucleic acids.

*–* ∆+*1:* *Social age.* *Nucleic acids*, the macromolecules of life with max. Exi force, integrate socially all other carbohydrates in herds of vital molecules, creating *the cell, the following ∆-scale of life.*

*The 3±∆ ages of cells.*

– ∆-1: The previous 3±∆ horizons of evolution of molecules brought the first cells.

*– Max. E: The age of RNA Protista.* The Entropy age of the cell is dominated by the simplest RNA *Protista*, whose ternary st-structure is based in: an external protein membrane; a series of ‘convex’ spiraled RNAs, the singularities that directs the cell, and an internal, intermediate water zone, the cytoplasm, where the cell reproduces its specific Entropy and information – thanks to the free ‘Entropy’ of water radicals – with the instructions given by those RNAs. Those Protista reproduce massively, exhausting the organic elements of the life soup. Then it comes:

*– <=>:* *The Age of DNA Protista*. It is the balanced, mature age of Protista. Dual RNAs peg together to form informative DNA rings, which store new genetic information that permits further growth and differentiation of Protista, according to new, improved 3 st-regions:

Entropy membranes invaginate the cell with a tubular network, the Golgi apparatus and protect the still DNA with a differentiated nucleus membrane; while new, specialized organelles perform the Entropy and information processes of the intermediate zone, creating reproductive Mitochondria and Chloroplasts.

*– Max.I: Informative age and differentiation*: *Eukaryotic age. *Informative DNA cells multiply its genetic memories, while RNAs differentiate into a triad of forms that increase in the intermediate space-time the reproduction of membranes and proteins, creating giant cells. They cannibalize and enslave smaller, symbiotic cells, specialized in the dual arrow of Entropy, (mitochondria and chloroplasts) and information (ribosomes). Those who absorb chloroplasts became algae; those who fed on mitochondria, animals.

*– ∆+1: *The biggest eukaryote animals are amoeboid cells that evolve faster, informative, electronic languages using heavier metal ions, K^{*} and Na^{–}, to send their messages to other cells through their membranes. The nervous language allows simultaneous cellular actions, creating mobile multicellular organisms called animals. While slower chemical languages that use ‘hormonal vowels^{7}’ put together unicellular algae into plants.

Let us consider the evolution of animals:

*3±∆ horizons of evolution of animals: network’s organisms:*

– ∆-1: Conception. Electric cells create multicellular organisms in control of all other cells, gathering in 3 physiological networks – neuronal, muscular and glandular=digestive systems that perform the informative, reproductive and energetic cycles of the organism as a macro-living st-point. The sequential dominance of those physiological networks creates the 3 ages of life – the energetic youth, reproductive maturity and informative old age – and the 3 horizons of evolution or ‘main phyla’ of multicellular animals.

*– Max. E:* The Entropy system -a central digestive tube- dominates the 1^{st} horizon of multicellular organisms, occupying the central zone in 3 sub horizons of formal evolution: the age of sponges, the age of hydras and the age of worms, the first bilateral animals created around a tubular, lineal digestive system that moves in the D¡motion of length.

*– <=>:* Worms develop blood networks based in metallic carbohydrates that carry to each cell of the body its oxygen Entropy, food quanta and the dual hormonal orders of the brain: reproductive orders and ‘killing orders’ performed by amoeboid leukocytes. Thus, as blood networks increase the efficient control of fractal cells, animals grow in size, starting an age of massive sea life speciation. Today we still have 90% of the genes of those worms.

*– Max.I:* Life jumps a fundamental discontinuum, when the first mollusks become insects and the first fishes become amphibians, colonizing the Earth. Their sensorial and nervous systems become overdeveloped in the new environment that has a higher transparency to informative light. Land animals specialize their 3 networks to the new medium in 3 sub-ages: the age of amphibians, which still reproduce in water, the age of reptiles and the age of birds and mammals, dominant in visual and nervous systems that ends with the arrival of Homo Sapiens.

*–* ∆+*1:* Homo sapiens develops a new informative language, the word, evolving into historic super-organisms, civilizations and economic ecosystems that grow in size till reaching a global D¡motion.

*Recap*. Biological organisms evolved in 3 horizons of increasing social complexity creating the 3 ±i scales of life: the age of molecules, the age of cells and the age of multi-cellular organisms, specialized in Entropy (plants) or information (animals).

**The Entropy age: 3±∆ Simple molecules.**

*In the graph, a glycine, the simplest ‘organism’ of life or amino acid with its self-similar form to a small mammal, with a nitrogen head, a carbon body and its oxygen legs. And the two fundamental species of complex molecular life: a nucleotide, dominant in information, attached to a sugar body and phosphoric acid and the detail of a protein body; the most reproduced species of the system. Lineal fats that store Entropy become the 3 ^{rd} essential topology of cellular life.*

The first age in the evolution of life is the age of simple molecules. Water became an organic soup filled with ammonia and simple chains of carbon, among which we highlight:

*– Max.E: Acids and fats. *They are headless, without nitrogen heads – a long, lineal limb of energetic carbons with oxygen legs on its extremes. They will become the fundamental Entropy of cells.

*– Max.I: Sugars* add an informative, cyclic D¡motion to headless fats. They are carbohydrate hexagons evolved socially in long chains, through oxygen connections, called polysaccharides.

*Amino acids: SxT functions and evolution into proteins*

The 3 life molecules, ammonia, methane and water, create *the spatial structure* of glycine, the simplest amino acid which resembles an animal, with the positive charged nitrogen head (amine), the negative charged Oxygen tail (carboxyl), and a carbon body chain that fusions together the 2 extremes, creating the i-logic ‘generator function’ of amino acids:

*Oxygen legs(E) <Carbon body (SxT)> (I) Nitrogen head*.

st-points adapt their morphology to the D¡motions and directional movement of their specific environment. Thus, while a still cell is cyclical, moving life molecules are lineal forms in which *the nitrogen ‘head’* is upfront to absorb information & Entropy in the direction of movement; *the structural carbon* membrane is in the center; *and the Entropy cycles* are performed by the *oxygen* tail that moves on the water:

*– Max.I: Informative cycles* are directed by its ammonia ‘clock’. Nitrogen vibrates across its Hydrogen triangle, perceiving and transferring electromagnetic information elaborated as Van der Wall forces to its carbon body that orientates the molecule in a chosen direction.

*– S≈T: Reproductive and social cycles:* A rigid carbon chain can peg to its sides by affinity (3^{rd} postulate of i-logic geometry) other carbon structures that latter might split, reproducing new glycine or might stick together, shaping new species of amino acids.

*-Max.E: Entropy Cycles:* The oxygen moves the molecule, propelled by the dual polarity of water.

*– Social and Transcendental cycles:* Their social evolution gives birth to macro-molecular proteins.

*– Existential, generational cycles:* The purpose of those molecules is to exist, performing their organic cycles.

Thus, after the birth of amino acids, Earth witnessed a massive replication of glycine, which soon diversified in all kind of sub-species that pegged to the original glycine new pieces of carbohydrates bodies, nitrogen eyes and oxygen legs. Thus the organic soup became an ecosystem of top predator amino acids that catalyzed the reproduction of new amino acids, absorbing the simpler molecular ‘nutrients’, till amino acids saturated the Earth’s oceans. Then those different amino acids associated in complementary st-herds, in which specialization occurred again, as some amino acids were designed better to gather Entropy with extra oxygen legs; some had extra nitrogen heads to process information and some were long carbon chains better suited to split, peg and reproduce new amino acid pieces. Thus we can easily classify amino acids as informative amino acids, with ring structures filled with Nitrogens; energetic amino acids, with added Oxygens – Phosphors and sulfurs, atoms with high ‘electro negativity’ that are able to capture energetic electrons; and reproductive amino acids with long carbon chains.

*Social evolution of amino acids: the protein age.*

Amino acids in their social stage of evolution became, according to the inverse morphological isomorphisms of transcendental evolution, the ‘relative Entropy’ of new macro-molecular proteins. So they lost its ‘active’ heads and tails, pegged now to each other, as the ‘fixed’ neutralized st-points of the protein’s spiral structure; where the active parts are radicals joined to the central carbon of the amino acid. Those bulky, seemingly unnecessary radicals that hindered the motions of free amino acids show its true value in proteins. (This often happens in evolution, which requires first mutational, inefficient stages that reorganize into functional macro-systems thanks to the directed ternary systems created by fast, planned evolution. If all were chaotic, slow Darwinian mutations most mutations would not survive long enough to transcend into useful new organs, as Darwin already noticed it, studying wing evolution. Thus transitional stages are a proof of ‘∆-volution’.)

Proteins are huge carbon chains that fusion the fractal actions of those radicals with many oxygen legs and a few nitrogen eyes into a simultaneous present of Max.IxE force. They are like centipedes, entities with simple perception but a fearsome Entropy that allows proteins to cut and kill all the micro-molecules of the life ecosystem. So they became the new top predators of the original carbon soup, probably chasing down free amino acids to replicate themselves.

Finally, lineal proteins evolved further, according to the inverse isomorphisms of transcendental, social evolution, forming self-replicating hollow membranes with cyclical, still forms, which nucleic acids will latter fill and dominate, creating cells. Indeed, the protein’s simple minds made their top predator status short living when the 3^{rd} informative horizon of molecular life, the nucleotide, evolved.

*Informative age: Nitrogen bases and Nucleotide acid.*

In the previous graph, we show the final, informative age of life molecules, which occurred when the amino acid evolved its lineal, simplex 3 st-regions adding a new, informative D¡motion and creating the 3 globular zones of the nucleotide:

*– Max. S≈T: *The improved body is called a sugar that has, instead of the carbohydrate’s zigzag line proper of amino acid bodies, a pentagonal form, a powerful compact body cycle that appears in all scalar morphologies. Further on, the sugar pentagon adds one lateral oxygen’s rudder that can chain or unchain itself to other sugar rings through easy to break oxygen bridges. So the reproductive speed of the new nucleotide’s body based in the capacity to peg and split its body increases.

*– Max. E:* A nucleotide tail adds up a highly energetic, phosphoric acid (PO_{4}H_{3}) that has more oxygens than the amino acid’s original COOH tail and so it swims better in water. The heavier phosphor is also a nitrogen-friendly atom, from the same 3-5 valence electronic column. So the head improves its control of the tail and its energetic oxygen atoms.

– Max.I: Finally the Nucleotides’ heads add up new nitrogens, creating cyclical, hexagonal rings, called Pyrimidines, which once more diversify in 3 subspecies: Thymine, Uracil or Cytosine…

– Uracil is lighter. So it is the brick for building highly mobile social nucleotides called RNAs.

– Thymine is heavier, since it has one more carbon, while Cytosine adds Nitrogen with 2 Hydrogen ‘antennae’. So they are the bricks of DNA, the most informative, still molecule of life.

Finally the most complex nucleotide heads are Purines: dual, pentagonal and hexagonal nitrogen rings, joined by a strong covalent C=C wall that form dual couples, called Adenine and Guanine, which add an external nitrogen antenna with 2 Hydrogen eyes to probe the unknown world*.*

So the globular structure of Nucleotides also creates more evolved social forms, the RNA and DNA acids that will control protein membranes in the cellular scale.

If structural bodies dominate amino acids and proteins, the dominant element in Nucleotides are their nitrogen heads. They become the unit of the social, informative languages of cells, playing a key role in all their informative tasks, as the main elements of most hormones and the fractal units of macro-molecular DNAs, which will create the higher, cellular scale of life forms.

*Bases express the 4 arrows of time in life. Some basic rules*

Now we have come to a key element of the program of life, the existence of 4 based, which will codify the creation of superorganisms of cells. Why? We have again and again show that each super organism requires a language able to express the 3±¡ D¡motions of space-time existence, the program or will of the Universe. It is easy then to observe that the 4 bases represent a new whole game of existence, as the 4 ‘positive’ D¡motions of space-time do or the 4 quantum numbers, or the 4 drives of life, and since function is form, just looking at those bases we can deduce that:

The simplex arrows are expressed by simplex Pyrimidines (single cycle)

- Uracil and thymine with more oxygen are the energetic drive expression and complex genetics show this to be the case, as they are more abundant in functions and genes related to energetic systems.
- Their informative head is adenine and as such is the dominant base of the system. It has a Nitrogen higher mass and a nitrogen head with 2 antennae. It is the head of the ATP systems that command as small molecules the game of proteins and most orders of actions in the cell. Both the simplex body T and head A assembly together by affinity and complementarity

The complex arrows are expressed by dual Nitrogen cycles:

- Cytosine is the balanced dual molecule. Hence the reproductive arrow. And indeed, when it is uncovered in the DNA loosing its cover it allows the expression of genes.
- Guanine is therefore the 4
^{th}social arrow and the base that brings the next scale.

This simple scheme of the 4 D¡motions of life languages is determinant for fully understanding the whys of genetics, which now are only described at the level of the 3^{rd} paradigm (how-description).

*Example: Receptors of complex, external orders.*

Consider the case of the GDP and GTP molecules. Their function is *essential to the transmission of orders from the higher scale of neuro-hormonal messages that *regulate the superorganisms of cells. 60 % of all external signals to cells are transferred through the activity of Guanine, the social nucleotide, activated through the G-protein channel. As such the GDP/GTP molecule is the ‘boss’ of intercellular communication, as the ATP molecule is the boss of energetic communication.

The ATP in fact in conjunction with the energetic Tyr amino acid (with an extra oxygen), and the energetic Phosphor atom, works with the second most common membrane messenger, after the G-protein channel, two poles that become activated by phosphorilization, bringing to them ‘hungry’ proteins that become energized and provoke signals for energetic and reproductive arrows. (Remember that simplex informative and complex social evolution are the two related arrows of temporal information, most associated, and the complex reproductive and simplex energetic arrows are the tandem associated to energetic space). Thus the receptor called Tirosincinasa is also related to the cinasas, which are the enzymes that provoke the energetic mitosis and death of the cell. This examples shows how *the emergence of the properties of smaller scales are always transcendental, social evolutions of one of the 4 arrows of time, the will or program of the Universe that maintains the self-similarity of scales.*

Let us consider the ternary differentiation of this molecule, ATP, as it is the key to the energetic force that propels and makes possible the cell.

*The age of nucleotides: ternary differentiation of species.*

So after the age of Amino acids and proteins, there was an age of Nucleotides, which differentiated again according to duality in 2 subspecies: One rich in Entropy, the other richer in information:

*– Max. E: The energetic Nucleotides are ATPs,* the key molecules in all energetic life processes. Breathing and feeding could not happen without ATP, the specialized Entropy Nucleotide that again subdivides in 3 subspecies, which can be identified as the energetic, balanced and informative ATP:

– Max. E: ATP proper – an Adenine nucleotide with a longer tail with 3 Phosphors and 10 oxygens, ordered in a classic decametric, 3×3+(∆+1) scale: each phosphor controls 3 oxygens, and the 10^{th} oxygen connects them to the sugar body.

– S≈T: ADP, which has lost 1 phosphor and 4 oxygens (an HPO_{3} molecule) releasing in the process 34 KJ of Entropy, balancing its form with less Entropy but the same Nitrogen information.

-Max.I: AMP, which has lost another HPO_{3}, becoming a cyclical molecule, since the phosphoric tail touches its nitrogen head. So it acts in cellular processes as an informative carrier, transferring hormonal information, amplifying it and programming the cell’s nucleus with that information.

*– Max.I: The informative, social evolution of nucleotide acids gives birth to RNA and DNA.*

Nucleotides evolve socially, becoming according to the isomorphisms of transcendental inversion between micro and macro planes (I_{∆-1=}E_{∆}), ‘Entropy cells’ of RNA and DNA spirals, grouped again in triads that form a spiral cycle. Those triplets surrounded by energetic ATPs create genetic scales in groups of 3, 9, 27…

Those 3^{n} elements in turn will shape the structure of 2 new macro-molecular informative species, differentiated according to the SxT complementary, dual principle:

*– Max. E: Lineal, moving RNAs* that carry the actions of the cells, again differentiated in:

*– Max. E: Ribosomal RNA* joined to energetic proteins that peg the carbohydrate’s pieces.

– S≈T: *Transfer RNA* that carries the fractal units that reproduce carbohydrates.

– Max.I: *Messenger RNA* that copies DNA information and takes it to the Ribosome.

*– Max.I: Cyclical, still, informative DNA,* made with 2 complementary RNAs, which carries so much informative, genetic information about the metabolic and reproductive cycles of all other carbohydrates that will become the ‘brain’ of the new scale of life, the cell… The nucleotide structure of DNA shows the magic ‘tetraktys’ that fascinated Pythagoras: 1, 2, 3, 4 D¡motions that add up into a decametric scale. Indeed, 1 DNA made with 2 RNA chains joined by nucleotide pairs form a structural tie of DNA; 3 nucleotides form the basic informative ‘gene’ to create amino acids; and 4 D¡motional bases is all what it is needed to create all the cycles and elements of the cellular game.

Those 3 type of molecular ‘ages’ will become then the 3 ‘topological’ st-forms of the cell: amino-acids become the Entropy bites of the cells along with water, its medium; proteins will create the walls reproduced in its organelles and nucleotide acids will become the informative, perceptive species that run the show.

*Recap*. The evolution of life molecules took life through its first 3 ages, the age of amino acids, the age of proteins and the age of Nucleotides, the informative, hyperbolic species that will reorganize them all to create the cell.

**∆-1 PLANE : CELLS**

*In the graph the Topological Disomorphism of cells: Protein are the ∆-2 lineal molecules which emerge, inverting its form as ∆-1 ðƒ, cyclical membranes. Inside the cell ∆-2 wave-like Nucleic Acid create the ∑∏-reprodutive element of the cell. Within them ∆-2 fat carbohydrates become the $-lineal vital energy sandwiched between both. So we can write a generator function for the cell: $-fat carbohydrates>∑∏-reproductive DNA>ð-cyclical proteins . *

*Cells follow all the laws of ∆S≈T, and are themselves supœrganisms with lower scales of being. So we can study those lower bio-chemical scales first.*

*In the left side, the cell has 3 st–zones: *

–* Max. E: It has an external, thin membrane, which in free cells have cilia that move the cell and act-react to external stimuli. In organic cells Entropy is provided by the blood system of the macro-organism. So external cilia disappear and invaginate as lysosomes that kill carbohydrates. *

*– Max.I: In the center, there is a nucleus of Max.Informative density, filled with cyclical or spiral DNA/RNA’s networks that control the st-point. *

*– SxT: RNAs dominate the intermediate space-time, directing the Entropy organelles, mitochondria or chloroplasts that produce Entropy; and the informative ribosomes that reproduce products, pegged to the Golgi apparatus – a membrane’s invagination. *

**Youth Horizon: From Prokaryote to Eukaryotic cells.**

The previous description of the evolution of molecules requires to change the ‘chip’ of the scientist and accept the tenants of organicism in simple atoms; which so far science has only, according to the Galilean paradox of self-centered perception, accepted for the next scale of life – the cell.

At the beginning cells, called monera, did not have a differentiated nucleus membrane, which means their informative singularity was mainly moving RNA. As evolution continued through the dual/ternary differentiations proper of all SxT systems, RNAs split accordingly in 3 sub-species to carry out the specialized Entropy, informative and reproductive tasks of protein control, carbohydrate production and self-replication, through complementary, inverse, specular translation. Then, one RNA, which produced a specular image of itself, probably got pegged to that image and became ‘fixed’, as a still, dual DNA, an informative mirror of an RNA molecule, geared to reproduce it. Accordingly those first DNA molecules acquired the cyclical ring form they still have in all monera.

Soon the extraordinary reproductive growth of DNA cells made them giant cells that exhausted their trophic nutrients. So finally they cannibalized other cells to maintain that reproductive growth. First those cells would be killed and their nutrients absorbed but then some very efficient energetic and informative cells would become slaves within the cell ‘farm’ in a process repeated in all ∆-scales: first top predators are hunters but then informative top predators create farms. So worm holes use herds of stars to absorb intergalactic dust; men use dogs to herd sheep; and monera cells used ribosomes to reproduce informative molecules and mitochondria to absorb Entropy, forming the first macro-cells. Those who ‘ate up’ mitochondria, which produce Entropy from carbohydrate products, would become animal cells and kept hunting other cells to find semi-elaborated nutrients. Those who ‘ate up’ chloroplasts, which produce Entropy from small carbohydrates and light, would become plant cells.

Now the quantity of DNA in the cell grew to add up the DNA of those organelles and its variety of cyclical memories was so vast that it had to pack itself further, changing its bidimensional, cyclical form into a 3 Ðimotional spiral, and acquiring structures of energetic sustain: proteins that coiled around DNA and a nucleus with differentiated walls that surrounded DNAs. The age of eukaryotic, gigantic cells had started.

*Recap*. As information multiplied in simple cells, the RNA age gave way to the DNA age whose extra-genetic code should control the evolution of complex multi-cellular structures.

**THE VITAL CYCLES/ACTIONS OF THE CELL.**

The cell is a brain-body system constructed with 2 elements, nucleotide acids, based in nitrogen bases and protein bodies based in carbon chains, which are the informative and spatial systems of the cell. Around that SxT core duality we find an expansive intermediate, cyclical region with all kind of slavish organelles that perform their Entropy cycles (based in the energetic properties of oxygen, water and similar electronegative atoms); and their informative cycles. Both cycles are catalyzed by denser metal atoms that boost the E/I capacities of carbohydrates. Thus, through the interaction of carbohydrates, metallic ions, proteins and nucleotide acids, cells perform the 3±∆ cycles of all st-points:

*Max.E:* In an organism, Mg, copper and iron capture oxygen and deliver it to each cell to perform energetic cycles; while in the cell cytochromes kill and split the energetic hydrogen atom into H^{+} and e^{–} ions in mitochondria or chloroplasts; absorbing its temporal entropy; while metal atoms stabilize protein enzymes.

Max.I: Na and K ions control the expansive and implosive rhythms of the electric membrane, sending informative messages among cells -while RNA and DNA molecules process *information* within the cell, reproducing new carbohydrate molecules.

– The combined effect of the accumulation of Entropy and information within the cell triggers the reproductive cycle, guided by RNA and DNA molecules.

– ∑: Cells *evolve socially* into macro-organisms. Yet only the RNA-DNA system creates complex informative, control networks.

– ±i: Cells live a *generational* cycle chained to an organism that kills them ‘periodically’, or as free cells that die when captured by top predator living beings. Since most cells can be immortal if no other system kills or controls them hierarchically.

All those cellular cycles are not ‘mechanic processes’ but they have evolved departing from the organic, dual, Darwinian and symbiotic interactions between proteins and nucleotide acids, the dominant energetic and informative macromolecules of cells. The most important cycle is the reproductive cycle, which in the cell as in other fractal space-time represents the existential will that ensures the perpetuation of the species. Let us consider it.

*Recap*. Cells follow the same arrows of existence of all st-points.

**The reproductive cycle.**

*The interphase, prophase, anaphase and telophase complete the reproduction of the cell, in which the centriole, a perfect example of a decametric structure, with 9×2 lineal proteins and a central 2×1 nucleus that controls the lower scale of 9 forms, plays the key energetic role of motion control.*

The phases of reproduction of a cell called mitosis (I, 6, 25), are in fact its death period, that lasts the shorter period of the daily life of a cell. It is the genius of the cell to use its death period to split and renew itself by the arrow of reproduction. Yet it can still be defined as a death period, which always means that the E/I fields of the system reverse in time, the energetic, destructive arrow dominates and ends up dissolving and splitting the complex informative brain. So in the cell you can see mitosis as the sudden dominance of the lineal, protein, killing centrioles which are reproduced in excess at the end of the S2 phase or 3^{rd} age of the cells, both at the lower molecular scale (assembly of ctk enzymes) and at cellular scale (centrioles and spindle) and then attack and break in two the chromosomes:

The reproductive cycle of cells shows an evolutionary pattern observed in many dual cycles between 2 complementary st-points of relative Entropy and information, which first confront their energetic and informative inverse forms. But as time goes by often by chance they realize that social, complementary evolution is more efficient than Darwinian, energetic destruction. And so they end up evolving together, following the positive, creative arrow of the Universe. We can hypothesize according to that homology the 3 ages of evolution of the reproductive cycle:

*– Energetic, unicellular age: Sexual reproduction* probably started as a Darwinian, energetic process of hunting in which lineal, energetic sperm killed the cyclical ovum and learned to host its DNA-code as virus do, in the ovum’s center. Yet as the sexual cycle evolved beyond *the energetic, young age *of the cycle, the ‘war of sexes’ ended and the cycle moved into a *balanced 2 ^{nd} age*.

*-S≈T: Reproductive, ‘colonial age’.* Now information was exchanged between both forms, the sperm and the ovum – since sexes are in fact a specialization of species into *energetic males and informative females*. And a new symbiotic dual form was born. Those forms would start reproductive radiations multiplying the number of cells. So probably sexual reproduction is a key factor in the multicellular explosion of the Cambric age.

*– Informative, palingenetic age*. Finally, in *the 3 ^{rd }age of sexual evolution the informative female species dominated the cycle*, as females have more genetic code (2 complete X chromosomes) and control during pregnancy the reproductive, palingenetic cycle that brings the embryo into a new ‘macro-organic level of existence’. If we observe the family cycle of human couples, women also tend to dominate the couple in its 3

^{rd}longer age, as Proust already notice; since information lasts longer than Entropy in temporal energy.

In complex organisms a living, reproductive cycle is dual: it departs from the simplex reproduction of a single cell that multiplies. Then those self-similar cells suffer a complex process of palingenetic reproduction that recreates an organism made of billions of cells, departing from that single cell.

*Cellular reproduction: a tug of war between DNA and proteins.*

Let us consider in this synoptic paper, the simpler process of cellular reproduction, as we have treated palingenesis in our analysis of the 4^{th} postulate of i-logic geometry:

Organic cells reproduce within a day, chained to the symbiotic daily feeding period of the organism that provides them with Entropy and information for that reproduction. Fractal cellular reproduction shows also that duality between positive, organic complementarity Vs. negative Darwinian struggle that either balances E-bodies and I-brains into organic systems or determines their mutual destruction when that balance is broken (death processes, Lorenz Transformations, etc.) In the reproductive cell cycle, the most efficient body proteins – lineal, tubular centrioles – and the top predator, informative DNAs enact an ambiguous struggle between their Darwinian desire of mutual destruction and their need of complementary evolution.

So cellular reproduction is a mixed cycle based in both kinds of relationships in which first the lineal species of cellular Entropy (centrioles, which are long (9+1) x 2 protein fibers with a perfect decametric structure), untie the cyclical species of pure information (DNAs), trying to split and kill them. Yet DNAs, once uncoiled, defend themselves ‘informatively’, creating a new membrane that breaks the centrioles apart into 2 groups, and also breaks the cell creating 2 new ones. We can distinguish several phases in that dual struggle, dominated alternately by each of those 2 forms that involve all the other elements of the cell, directed in their dance by those max.E x Max.I top predator elements or ‘upper classes’ of the cell. It will be a tug of war that illustrates all the geometrical strategies of Darwinian and complementary events between dynamic st-points:

-In *interphase*, both top predator substances replicate. Centrioles are outside the membrane, which protects the DNA.

*-In the prophase centrioles start their hunting: *the protein’s membrane of the nucleus dissolves, exposing DNAs’ chromosomes that become visible preys. As all other universal preys do, from wriggling worms to high frequency rays, from submissive servants to herds of electrons in front of a quark or fishes in front of a shark, chromosomes try now to hide by coiling up, becoming contracted, shorter forms. Then the hunting starts. Centrioles have replicated and now double its fractal action, moving to both sides of the DNA nucleus, forming dual, long molecular chains joined by filaments. So they *create a polar field of forces that captures in its filamentous web the self-replicated DNA,* as a North and South Pole create together a magnetic force field that aligns atoms or two boats web a net to capture fishes.

*-In the metaphase chromosomes defend themselves from the 2 *centrioles that throw the ‘hooks’ of their force field, stretching the DNAs*.* But those chromosomes that have replicated in the earlier interphase evolve now socially in couples of parallel forms, increasing its fractal mass and moving away from the centrioles in a classic protective strategy: They arrange themselves in the equator of the spindle, adopting a Darwinian, perpendicular position, the farthest away from those centrioles. It is exactly the way in which diamagnetic particles that flee from magnetic fields, arrange themselves trying to receive the minimal quantity of force from the North and South Poles of the magnetic field.

*-In the Anaphase centrioles counter-attack*, splitting away the chromosome pairs.

*In the telophase, DNAs find their winning, defensive strategy: They are* the informative species that store the genetic code of all cellular forms. So DNAs start to reproduce new membranes in a frenzy till those membranes break the centrioles’ spindle through its middle zone, isolating each centriole and breaking their field of lineal, protein forces. Since lineal, energetic or reproductive beings, like centrioles or ‘magnetic’ fields are, cannot create monopoles. Only temporal, implosive, informative cyclical particles can do that. So the spindle dissolves and the new membrane divides the cell.

Now the system reaches again a balance, as the dual chromosomes and the dual centrioles become again single forms surrounded by a new membrane.

Thus the dynamic tug of war between a protein’s body and a nucleotide’s brain ends up in a draw, creating 2 cells instead of one, which will re-start after a rest period a new *interphase* process of protein and DNA reproduction. Since the Universe is indeed a game of reproductive radiations, the ultimate will of all beings that want to survive their fractal, periodic death by creating a self-similar ‘present’ form.

A variation of that process required in sexual reproduction, is called meiosis, in which the twin reproduction of DNA and its subsequent destruction of the nucleus’ membrane is provoked by the energetic sperm that enters the ovum, invading, as a virus does, its DNA nucleus and merging its genetic material. So, as it happens in the interphase of a cell, the fecundated sexual cell has 2 parallel quantities of DNA, albeit with different genetic material, coming from the ovule and the sperm. So as the replicating process repeats through the same phases of any cellular reproduction, the final result won’t be an identical cell but a cell that mixes the genes of both, the sperm and the ovum. When besides sexual duplication there is an interphase with chromosomal duplication the final 2 cells will be diploid cells with twice the genetic material of the original cell. This happens only in multicellular organisms, as redundant genetic material is useful to store genetic orders needed for the complex construction of multicellular structures*;* but it would be redundant in the simple life of a monera cell, which escapes the interphase duplication.

The ƒð§ x P$T duality of lineal sperm and cyclical ovum extends outside the realm of form and transcends to the upper scale of multi-cellular organisms and sexual characters: the ovum is an informative, cyclical, autotrophic female cell with higher chromosomal content; while sperm is an energetic, heterotrophic, lineal male cell with higher mobility. And we find according to the Fractal Principle, 3 evolutionary types of increasingly differentiated sexual cells: semen and ovum, which are equal in spatial size and temporal form (isogamy); semen that is equal in form but smaller than the ovum (anisogamy); and ovum and semen, which are different in spatial size and temporal form (oogamy), as in human beings.

Those differences between male sperm and female unicellular ovum, latter diluted as their genetic materials mix, reminds us of the differences between unicellular animal and plants, the main dual differentiation of life along its SxT parameters that we will study now in more detail.

*Recap*. Sexual reproduction evolved from an energetic event in the unicellular age into a reproductive radiation and finally into the palingenetic process dominated by the ovum.

Cellular reproduction can be explained as a tug of war between the informative DNA and the reproductive proteins of the centrioles.

**The death cycle..**

In Cyclical Time death is caused by the finite limits of fractal time and spatial information. Death is a clear prove of the discontinuity of space and temporal energy. If we were continuous, that continuity of time and space would make us immortal and infinite. Which means that only the ∞ sum of fractal time-spaces or absolute Universe is eternal: the isomorphisms of temporal Entropy, the logos-mind of the Universe do not have and end nor a principle, because the sum of all the transformations of Entropy and information balances a dynamic Reality that never dies, remaining always in a relative, equal present. Reality exists ‘per in secula seculorum, amen’.

Only reproduction guarantees certain immortality, re*creating our form in other region of spatial information.* Yet in all species the rate of reproduction also goes through 3 ages, and so when reproduction halts, not only the ‘cellular’ individual but the species of the ‘higher plane’ dies:

– *Big bang phase*: A new species multiplies very fast departing from a 1^{st} individual.

– *Steady state:* Its reproductive rate stabilizes.

– *Population Crunch:* Finally it slows down to a halt, extinguishing the species.

Death is in fact the most obvious prove of the discontinuity of space and temporal energy. If we were continuous, that continuity of time and space would make us immortal and infinite. Thus only the infinite sum of quantic time-spaces, the absolute Universe is eternal.

For the rest of us only reproduction guarantees certain immortality. Yet the rate of reproduction of any species is also quantic and goes through the 3 ages, starting slow, increasing its rate and finally slowing down to a halt, extinguishing the species or type of DNA-cells of any organic system. So in a human being the number of divisions of any cell reaches up to 50, whereas in chickens it goes up to 20 divisions. The greater rate happens in the oldest, living species: the Galapagos turtle that divides 10^{2} times its cells. E=10^{i=2 }is in fact the commonest constant in information warping, from the protonic accumulation of form in the atomic table, which after 100 forms becomes unstable to the limit of human aging.

According to the ternary principle, 3 biological strategies however seem to succeed death:

– Max.E= Some simple systems (coelenterate) reverse its time clock.

– Max. Re: Cells ‘trick’ their organic time clocks, to free themselves from the servitude of death, by multiplying its quantity of reproductive genes – its DNA molecules. The record belongs to cancerous cells, very rich in DNA, from the reproductive uterus of Henrietta Lacks, the so-called HeLa cells.

– Max.I: Humans achieve partial immortality through cultural memes.

Is there a species whose number of reproductions is infinite, an immortal being? No. Since even the nucleons of the big-bang reproduced e^{60} times to create the Universe*, *shaping a similar reproductive curve to that of living beings that now has slowed down to a trickle. So all dies for the game to renew itself.

*Causes of Physiological Death.*

The opposite process to the creation of life and the creation of form is the destruction of form into Entropy or *death*, (I<E*: Max. E x Min.i*), equally common. As one feeds into the other and together balance the dual arrows of the Universe.

Thus, the fundamental cause of death is to exist beyond the balance of form between the E and I components of any St-field. All beings have limits of excess of Entropy and/or form, which once crossed will bring their extinction, as their Entropy and information quanta ‘explode’ and split, dissolving the networks that kept the form together and were its inner consciousness. If a particle explodes close to C speed and splits its Entropy/information parameters according to Lorentz functions, so does a human being after dying. His Entropy dissolves back into his ∆-1 simpler cells. And then, since all deaths are dual big-bang explosions*, *humans return finally to the molecular, amino acid level from where they departed.

If we want to be specific about the *causes of death in *human organisms, death is the product of an imbalance, either by an excess of Entropy that causes sudden death in minimal Time (Max. e=Min.i), through war, sudden sickness or accidents, or by the accumulation of spatial information that spends the Entropy of the being during its long 3^{rd} age, leaving traces of past cycles in cells and physiological networks that cause their malfunction. In other words, the nervous, informative network exhausts the body, causing a Max.I=min. E imbalance, that wrinkles and breaks the body cells into death. But also the opposed phenomenon, an excess of Entropy caused death. In both cases the imbalance breaks the complementarity between the space and time content of the being. However, since the direction of living beings is towards the informative future, the informative imbalance is more frequent and shows in the ‘growth’ of time properties.

So old people are as time is, cyclical, memorial, curved, with discontinuous wrinkles that break the smooth continuity and linearity of young, spatial beings. That quantic, curving process happens in all the species of the Universe that age: cyclical wrinkles and quantum cracks occur not only in the skin of an old man but in the membranes of our cells, their Golgi apparatus and “Entropy” mitochondria. That loss of Entropy in any old being, which becomes quantized and implosive, with negative curvature, has manifold manifestations: cells shrink and their membranes no longer dilate. An old man measures a few centimeters less. The 2 networks, the Entropy network or membrane and the informative network become rigid, quantized and no longer reproduce. In human cells, collagen and elastin, the proteins of cells, loose their elasticity and expansive capacity, creating, informative connections among them. So happens to the rigid, cross-wrinkled skin of the old man. Meanwhile the energetic, metabolic capacity of the organism and its quantic cells diminishes.

In a more generic way information and time are parallel. So species with more information and less Entropy live longer, according to the Time-Space inversion: Max. E=Min.i. Thus for example, an animal that fasts systematically and receives less Entropy, lives longer (hungry rats live a 20% more). The female, informative sex with smaller expenditure of Entropy lives longer than the energetic male. A being that lives in a hot, energetic environment lives shorter than one living in a cold environment. Hibernation that slows the metabolic rate elongates life. There is also a proportional relationship between the informative weight of the brain and the life span of an animal: Max.i (brain weight) =Max.i (life-span); which in inverse to the proportional relation between the metabolic expenditure of Entropy and the life span of the being: Max. metabolic rate (Max. E) = Min. Life span= Min.i, proving once more the inversion of space/temporal energy. So humans with huge brains live much longer than lions with huge bodies.

An excess of energetic atoms diminish time existence: Free radicals, which are oxygenated, energetic molecules, with free electrons (the Entropy body of atoms), deteriorate cells and their accumulation with age is a major cause of death. The degeneration and disorder of those cells can be caused by energetic radiations (electromagnetic rays of max. Entropy cause the mutation and death of cells.) The increase of fat, Entropy cells causes the death. So doctors establish a direct lineal relation between the accumulation of lipofuscine and the death of a living organism. An excess of Entropy is the main cause of accidental death among youn∆sters. So a speedy car crash breaks the body and the shock of a weapon’s impact, a form of energetic metal, kills a human being.

Yet in generic terms, information that forms, carves and quantizes amorphous, continuous Entropy is the supreme cause of death. As the chisel of a sculptor creates form by destroying the marble, so does the game of existence: For example, elephants create the form of the savannah, when killing its trees; quantized hands are formed in a fetus, when interdigital cells commit suicide (apoptosis). So ducks, which do not kill them, have membranes in their hands. All those causes of death have created an equal number of scientific theories about death, all related to the inversion between spatial information and temporal Entropy and the balance between Entropy and information that defines existence, as opposed to its imbalance that causes death.

*Mental death.*

But what happens to the brain’s information stored in the brain, after death? Does it dissolve also, as body cells do; as the magnetic, informative field of a star does or the mass vortex of a Nuclear Bomb does? Or does it transcend, as the photonic light does, into the higher electron, or the seminal cell does when it evolves into a new macro-organism?

According to empirical descriptions of d