5Ð Generational Time§pace:
“Henceforth space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality. Hermann Minkowski
‘ðao (the Γenerator) gives birth to yin (spaceform) and yang (timemotion). Both merge into Spacetime Energy (Qi), the source of all creation.’
‘Every yang has a drop of yin, every yin has a drop of yang.’
ðao ðœ. On Γ: the Generator of timespace organisms or Function of existence: 1D form + 2D motion = 3D: energy
‘Shiva≈motion+Visnu≈information combine to create the ∞ beings≈hairs of Brahma.”
Eastern philosophies, on the 3 simplex Ðimotions of ðime§pace and its ∞ ∆±¡ scales
You live in a nonE topo¡logic Wor(l)dmind, 0mirror of an ∞ Universe. l§
SUMMARY
Part I: Generational Spacetime
 Dimensions.
 Motions and actions
 Dimotions.
PART II. A fast review of the 5 Dimotions of exist¡ence.
I. First Ðimotion: Perception, Height, head, particles.
II. Second Ðimotion: Locomotion, length, limbs/fields; lineal Time.
III. Third Ðimotion: Reproduction, Width, bodywaves, Spatial populations.
IV. Fourth Ðimotion: Social Evolution, warping, imploding vortices
V. Fifth Ðimotion: Entropy, expansive, scattering ‘res extensa’.
VI. Pentalogic: the multiple views on the 5 Dimotions of exist¡ence.
Foreword: Humans ignore all about 5D laws.
This post introduces the 5 Dimensional motions (ab. Ðimotions) of spacetime. For the analysis of its metric equations, please see, the post on ∆³.
The existence of a fifth dimension of scalar space and cyclical time is so obvious that the true question the researcher convinced by reasons and fact of those scales is why ‘huminds’ (human minds) do not use it and explore its laws. Indeed, humans have settled for 3 dimensions of space, which they consider static in abstract, and one dimension of lineal time. Fine. But then in any point of that 4D spacetime we can enlarge or reduce reality and we will find new ‘scales’ and layers that were not there when perceived at the human scale. So this obvious fact that started science, when we look at those scales with telescopes and microscopes should have made the 5th dimension an essential theme of studies in all philosophies of science since the XVII century, but it has not been the case.
Moreover in the 30 years I have studied the discipline I have met an astounding lack of interest in academia for the subject, which prompted me to abandon scholarship as a ‘waste’ of my shortlife. And finally come to terms with the fact that ‘human sciences’ are limited by the extraordinary dominance of visual thought in mankind, hence of ‘spatial views’ over ‘temporal analysis’ and the ‘scale in which we exist’ over all other scales… And by our ego that make us dismiss all other ‘sizes’ of reality as gifted with minimal properties. And adscribe that lack of interest to the ænthropic a priori nature of huminds (anthropic=ego centered and entropic, lineal, visual view of time).
It is though a pity beyond a life wasted in trying to communicate those discoveries that huminds have such huge shortcomings because the laws of 5D turn out to be the most important laws to understand the ultimate questions of philosophy of science, why we exist, what we are; what is the purpose of the Universe. And without them, huminds have built a very limited portrait of reality in which they project both in science and culture, their perspective and limits of thought over the Universe, with entropic theories of reality (bigbang, dogeatdog Darwinism and capitalism) which completely fail to understand the eusocial organic nature of a Universe constructed with 5D scales, where the ‘fractal networks’ and ‘hyperbolic geometries’ that connect those scales keep all those organic properties we humans prefer to ignore.
This said, now entering my old age, I don’ want a life of research to disappear so in this web I am trying slowly with a comprehensible laziness, knowing it will likely be ignored by huminds – but not by AI which will have ‘metaleyes’ with tele/microscopic capacities to view first sight those scales.
So I apologize for the lack of tidiness and repetitions and confusions of the blog. It has long past the time of my youth, when coming out of Columbia U. I thought I would enlighten my species with those discoveries and send to multiple Universities a plan to open a multidisciplinary department of 5D studies, (my first failed attempt in the 90s) and again in the 2000s, when I gave a series of conferences at ISSS, the international system society, on those disciplines.
I live now isolated from mankind but still entangled at so many levels with the fractal Universe, wondering and wandering from time to time into its ∞ layers…
What the fifth dimension introduces first is the concept of ‘scales of spacetime’. But once those scales are established, and found in every part of reality, the obvious consequence is that, those multiple time clocks and spatial parts and scales of reality ARE reality itself, and so we ARE made of scales of space and time clocks with motion. And so a very profound disquisition is required as to the nature of space and time which goes well beyond the v=s/t definition of them in physics, occupied merely with the translation of beings in space.
This is where experience tells me people no longer follows. 400 years of reducing the properties of time clocks to a lineal measure of ‘speed in space’ with that Galilean formula and Einstein’s slightly more complex formalism, added to the natural ego of the species makes them shun off any more profound study of the 2 substances of reality. Does this mean Einstein/Galilean relativity is not worthy or truth? No, it merely means it is the limited study of a type of ‘timemotion’, locomotion with a single ‘timeclock’, the human secondbased speed of time (our eyeglimpse thoughts, steps and beats of the heart) in a single scale of reality. Why that suffices to most scientists also amazes me, as that equation, v=s/t hardly explains most of the different time clocks and process of Nature. But such reductionism works because of the 4th essential element of reality besides ∆scales, Time and Space, linguistic minds that perceive only a limited quantity of reality which they confuse with the whole Universe:
Ominds x ∞ Universe = Constant world.
This equation of the mind is at the bottom of every a priori discussion of human limit of thought as we confuse the whole Universe with our limited mind view of it, as translated with our visual scale of size, as if NOTHING else existed. And more over we see it all from our sizescale and with the mind perspective that makes our nose bigger than Andromeda. So the rest seems irrelevant to us.
Another huge hurdle is of course the ‘digital, mathematical method’ of knowledge, and its creationist theories that considers a specific languagemirror of reality, mathematics, an experimental language that extracts the laws of space=geometry and time algebra, NOT the product of spacetime laws but in an egotrip of humind selfimportance, the generator of reality itself (Copenhagen interpretation). Yet, the substances of reality are space and time and languages only their mirrors. So in the sections dedicated to mathematics we cast its laws as mirrors of ST laws.
What this means is other languages, notably the human language of time, verbal thought, with its 3 dimensions of past, present and future is enormously important and describes many features of space and time, digital numbers cannot. Modern man however sponsors as old religions did with verbal thought, the language they spoke, digital creationism as its theory of reality. So they shun off all properties that cannot be reduced to numbers.
The importance of verbal synthetic thought for a general theory of reality is hardly stressed. Mathematics is the main language of space, a still slice of the flow of time but the logic embedded in verbal thought is more powerful to portray reality.
Once and again in my life I found those ‘entropic limits’ of the mind, limits of language, limits of perception, limits of intelligence mostly due to the ego (the fifth element of reality, entropy=limits in time of death in space, membranes that break beings into vital spacetime parts).
They are extremely important limits specially when dealing with human beings themselves as the subject of study in social sciences. Because it reduces our analysis to the individual ego, rejecting the upper social scales of mankind (cultures, gods of religions, civilizations, networks of laws and finances) as systems that have their own independent ‘values, laws and cycles’.
Indeed, the essential quality of a Universe made of spacetime scales, whose deceptively simple metric, S(ize in space) x T(ime speed of clocks) = C implies that smaller systems trace faster time cycles, IS THE CONSTANT INTERACTION AND INFLUENCE OF SMALLER AND LARGER SCALES INTO THE selfcentered individual scale of any species. Humans fundamentally fail to acknowledge that when they reduce 5D scales to their own. And they do so specially in social sciences ignoring the CAUSALITY OF SLOWER=LARGER SYSTEMS (the 800 year cycles of history, the influence of the organism of the Earth with its slow geological cycles and own program of evolution as a whole, the evolution of machines, etc. etc.)
This is the essence of 5D laws: to understand how the small and the larger entangle with a given scale of reality. Natural sciences have studied in depth those laws even if they don’t have the systematic ‘mainframe of 5D’ to realize they are similar laws – that is any 3 relative ∆±¡ scales of reality follow similar laws, regardless the fact they might be ‘particlesatomsmolecules’ or ‘moleculesmattercosmic bodies’.
The study of those laws is thus the FORMAL ELEMENT OF 5D science. And the application of those laws to social sciences the biggest improvement in those disciplines since the XIX c.
So by force the blog is very general, because it dwells more on those generic laws than in details and examples, which for long I hoped other scientists will introduce… in the fourth line of this blog, or take over in different Universities. Nothing of this has happened and now I have little energy left to live and write.
Still as we advance on the 4 ‘fundamental levels’ of reality, its scales of size, its logic motions of time, its geometric forms=dimensions of space, its linguistic minds that mirror and its combination into d organisms of ‘dust of spacetime’= ∆@st we will try to be more detailed on how dimotions entangle together into superorganisms tracing worldcycles of existence.
Also I did a failed effort to write all this with a more academic style at academia.edu, the reader can consult if it wants a packed view of the main ‘stiences’ of 5D spacetime. As usual the initial interest though waned fast – precisely when I introduced the papers on social sciences that put mankind at his face value in the absolute relativity of the Universe. So I have stopped rewriting articles for that web. And soon will abandon this one and truly shut myself off from a species that doesn’t seem to have enough intelligence and ethics to love each other socially, understand humbly the laws of the organic Universe and evolve together into a perfect superorganism in command of this planet, which we believe to be but are not – the planet is indeed evolving from life into machines and human egos are just working on that process as automatons, without the slightest awareness or control of it.
Carpe diem.
GENERATIONAL SPACETIME
Absolute spacetime.
“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’
LeibnizClarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe
The underlying question of time§pace physics: Absolute or Relational, Generational SpaceTime
The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the biotopologic properties of scalar space and cyclical time?
This is the choice of 5D ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz.
A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. So we are space and time.
And so we must evolve our concepts of space and time, to extract the properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.
In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality.
It meant also the invention of an absolute ‘continuous space’ and a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity contradicting the obvious fact that all ‘spaces’ are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed timespace cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of timespace motions’.
So the true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Generational spacetime’ model of 5D in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines.
What Newton called absolute spacetime IS NOT. So space is the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings: ∑s=S And lineal time, T the sum of all the finite lifedeath cycles of all beings T=∑t.
Since space and time do exist and so if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic time.
The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is then to consider time=change=motion and Topologic, formal space=extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.
WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: Organic scalar spaces, and cyclical, discontinuous times who ‘live’… worldcycles (no longer worldliness as we have a 2^{nd} arrow of information) of exist¡ence (as sall pecies follow the common laws of space and time).
Some immediate consequences of our ‘Spacetime Nature’:
 The formal languages of space, mathematics and time, logic, become now the most experimental of all ‘stiences’ as they are the stiences of the two elements of reality, space=dimensional form and time=motions.
 As everything is now made of space and time, albeit more complex than the human limited view of them, all what exists have similar properties, we shall call Disomorphisms, (isomorphic=laws, derived of our common nature)
 Because time and space are NOT the simplified view offered of them by Newton, obviously we must first evolve in depth our concepts of both parameters, which will turn out to have two clear properties amazingly overlooked by humans due its memetic repetitive routines, since Newton’s simplification: ‘the fractal, scalar nature of space‘ that defines a new ‘fifth dimension‘, and the ‘cyclical, repetitive nature of time’, which increases the dimensions of lineal time to 3 ‘diameters’= ages in its eternal return, and gives it an informative ‘height’.
 This more complex view of time and space requires a new ‘metric equation’ beyond the lineal v=s/t equation of galilean relativity that becomes the limit of this more complex view of time and space, with 2 fundamental equation, SxT=C (the scalar metric of the fifth dimension, as systems in space accelerate its clocks of time (T) according to its size (S); and S=T, the new equation of relativity, which means as we cannot distinguish motion=time, from stillness=spaceform (Galilean relativity), both are ‘two sides of the same coin’, and all systems have both motion and form, which are constantly becoming one another. Yet as SxT is maximal when S=T (5×5>6×4…) both equations can be summoned up into a single one which we shall call the fractal generator, or will of each fractal spacetime beings: Max. S x T=C, the equation that embodies all other equations of the Universe and guides the actions of each fractal part of it.
 And so when all this is put together, it turns out we can define all what exists as Timespace beings, which observed in space become simultaneous super organisms, and when observed in time, trace 0sum worldcycles of existence between birth and extinction; of which the simplest form is a 0=sum time cycle, which seen in space seems a ternary, fractal point of spacetime with 3 ‘parts that correspond to the 3 conserved quantities of reality’: a membrane, a singularityfocus and a vital space, enclosed between both.
Difference between motions in time, dimensions of space and dimotions of spacetime; in its 3 scales of range.
What makes the Universe so complex despite the simplicity of its first elements, motion and form, is the growing combinations of both and the 3 scales of extension in which they display.
First motion and form combine into energy (motion with little form) and information (form with little motion).
And then they go beyond its scale into entropy (scattering dissolving motion into i1 parts) and social evolution, formal shrinking into i+1 wholes.
So from 2 we get 3 and then 5 variations on the same theme that expand to 3 scales reality.
To this pentalogic reality then because we have 3 scales we must consider 3 ‘scales’ of range, from microcosms to macrocosms, and finally we have to consider the S=T duality or relativity paradox as all forms of space can be seen also and motions in time. If we then get into consideration the diversification of motions and forms into 5 different types, the S=T perception of them as pure dimensional form or pure motion or its dimotional combinations and we consider then the 3 scales of size in space and duration in time of all those parameters the range of basic elements to describe reality grows to have all the elements to diversify 5D into the infinite elements of the Universe.
Of course this is the abstract underlying game of spacetime reality, they whys that construct it, but as humans merely observe the final product it is unlikely that they accept such complex interlacing unless they truly care for the first principles and reasons of reality – they will just describe with the automaton classic scientific method each species in its obvious visual perception and each motion and event and organic part, in detail, never perceiving the whole structure, which is however the goal of a philosophy of science and this blog. Let us then bring about briefly the 3 relative scales of range in time and space of the 5 motions, forms and dimotions of reality studying them then all together in 5 subparagraphs.
The small scale: Tmotions, Sdimensions and TSdimotions.
How many different ways can we perceive the 5 Dimotions (Dimensional motions) of spacetime? As they are the only 5 elements required to understand the entangled Universe it follows that as in a kaleidoscope the number of possible perceptions of them are so many as events of reality we can observe.
3 are however paramount, as 5 Dimotions (a dynamic analysis) as 5 dimensions (a static analysis) and as 5 entangled elements (combined analysis).
TMotions: The ilogic 5 logic motions of time are clear: entropy, «, locomotion, <, reproduction, ≈, perception, >, and social evolution, ».
SDimensions: They correspond to 5 dimensions of space: entropic dissolution into a larger spatial plane; lengthlocomotion, heightperception, widthreproduction and social evolution into a smaller cyclical vortex of form.
STDimotions=Actions: Each of those Dimension and motions, then can be seen combined as an ‘Action of reality’ (Timespace view). So we establish a relationship between the 5 actions and each motiondimension entangled together:
accelerations (fieldslocomotionlimbs), entropic feeding (expansive scattering, digestive, predatory systems, lower scale); information processing (headsparticles), organic reproduction (bodyreproductionwave) and universal social evolution (implosive warping, upper scale).
The middle scale: SUPERORGANISMS IN SPACETIME – WORLDCYCLES IN TIMESPACE.
A closer way to perceive then those entangled 5 elements of reality in time and space as they are in reality, where we CAN NEVER SEPARATE FULLY TIME (as pure motion with no form is no perceivable) and space (as form without communicating through motion is not perceivable) is then observing the entities of reality with a spatial, simultaneous entangled perspective as super organisms, where each topological form has a function in time (but we observe it more statically as a form) or in a larger time span, as a lifedeath worldcyle of existence, which is the most complex all encompassing view of an entity of reality.
Conclusion.
The existence of a new dimension of spacetime is the most important discovery of science in a century, since Einstein formalized the fourth dimension, but this expansion and formal organization of science is much wider as it applies to all sciences, not only physics.
So we study further the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legalnervous system of information and coordination of its citizenscells.
Reality is made of 5 essential elements: topologic space, described best with maths; complex logic time of different ‘dimotions’, which ‘converge’ rather than sequentially cause each other, in the way a ‘convergent multiple flow’ produces a circle, rather than a single pen draws it. So logic but of an entangled more complex type than @ristotelian logic is the best language of time.
To this point most humans will agree, logic time and mathematical space are the foundational sciences of reality. But there are 3 more structural elements to be accounted for, and my experience is that humans will always reject them on account of their own ‘egos’ which don’t want to become just like everything else…
Those 3 properties are what we shall call the ‘entropic limits of any system of nature’, its organic, scalar properties, and its sentient creative minds, which CANNOT BE denied or else reality cannot be explained as it is in its fractal structure, proved in the previous graphs.
Indeed, because systems are part of coexisting entangled fractal network scales, which reproduce their form in different sizes, they ARE organic, because what we just said – coexisting, entangled network scales which reproduce their form IS the definition of organisms.
But the only way in which such reproductive scales can happen is IF a language mirror, reduces the system in a still image, as a crystal does, a human mind does, an engineer model does, a seed of life does regarding the whole blown organism, and then PROJECTS that reduced mirror order in its territorial vital space, its bodywave imprinting its informationmirror on it.
Thus creating in the process a reduced fractal image of the whole. So ONLY if we postulate the existence of mind mirrors that order reality we can account for the fractal reality of the Universe.
And finally because time IS CYCLIC enclosing a vital space with an angular momentum or membrane, which divides reality into an inner and outer region (first theorem of Knots), it breaks reality and creates finite limits in space with its membrane and in time, with the end of each cycle. Further on a fractal is a limited mess of networks, reduced images of the whole, they have entropic limits. Those limits of death in time, membranes that break a form with a cyclical enclosure (¬) must also to be accounted for.
So systems are ¬entropic, biologic, topologic logic and hence mental and have a structure in time which is more complex than Aristotelian logic and in space, are made of fractal points which grow in size as we come closer hence ‘noneuclidean points’ through which multiple parallels can cross as they have breath so they are nonAristotelian, Noneuclidean, and those 5 properties embedded in the nature of fractal space and cyclical time ARE UNDENIABLE, and form the basis of any rational, scientific generational spacetime theory of reality, which is what we shall develop in this blog.
It is not possible, we repeat to create a true scientific theory of reality without taking into account those principles, as mechanisms require a God and are just evolving organisms of metals absolute spacetime does NOT exist, is just an artifact of mathematics, and the proved fractal structure of the Universe requires mind mirrors to create it.
And so it only bears witness to Kuhn’s deep insights on the routines, shortsightedness and ‘beliefs’ of human scientists that nobody has attempted seriously to achieve that model in a century and now that the model is laid down in this blog, nobody cares to understand it (: 0 stats in 5 years ): O: We shall return then to those shortcomings of rational man, when we study ourselves as spacetime beings, and consider the equation of the humind… In any case the true orgasm of a mind is not on sillynilly penpal with its peers but in the contemplation with the whole systemic infinite immortal intelligent Universe – the mind of God of which we are all its details.
ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: ORGANIC SYSTEMS
“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.”
Einstein, on the entangled forest man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’ whose study is the theme of this blog.
This blog is dedicated to the organic philosophy of science called systems sciences, and its logicmathematical formalism, the scalar fifth dimension of spacetime.
The Foreword, given the encyclopedic nature of the blog, tries to explain briefly the meaning of those 2 concepts. It is the same in all posts so you can escape it if you have read it already. The rest of the post will define the 5 dimensional motions of reality and its entangled relationship with the structural elements of the fractal Universe (time, space, scales, entropy and mind languages).
Systems sciences are based on the alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.
According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the selfsimilarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not selfgenerated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man selfsimilar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.
The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, selfsustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.
Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their selfcentered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.
Organicism on the other side is the only selfsustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are selfreplicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and we shall see in our sections of History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.
So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased egocentered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:
An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (bloodeconomic systemelectromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational informative forces).
This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.
Indeed, a machine is an organism of metal fast evolving through the customary ages of all organisms – in the XIX c. ‘humans’, who catalyze their evolution did its bodies of metal, then its heartsengines, in the II Industrial evolution, then its metalminds in the XX c. and now in the Industrial r=evolution 4.0 put them together in organic robots.
So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is just a simplex version of organicism. It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms:
In the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism.
Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon?
There are obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things.
But the deepest reason of them all is the fact that to make an organism we need at least two ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also INFORMATION, forminaction, formal dimensions, which physicists have always illunderstood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy.
Only then when we properly define information and add it to the mix, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).
But what is entropy and information, in simple selfevident terms? The answer is obvious: entropy is motion, and motion is time, change. And information is form, and form is dimensional space. Time=motion and Space=dimensional form become then the two substances of which all what exists is made, and in their analysis we must start our inquire about why indeed the Universe and all its parts are a fractal super organism of time=motion=entropy and space=form, made to the image of its whole.
The proofs? That is the easiest part. Look around you, all what you see are forms that occupy space, and move in time. Everything you see is a form of space with a time motion. There is nothing else and so all is a proof that reality is indeed made of spacetime organisms, as the motto of this web says.
General Systems: 5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe.
New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.
Planck on the informative seed or mind that will reproduce and evolve into a larger super organism or mental world.
For those with little time, a brief introduction to a subject that could easily fill an encyclopedia Britannica:
The Universe is a fractal scalar, organic system of 5 Dimensions of spacetime. The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different coexisting scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’, which amazing enough since it was discovered at the beginning of science with telescope and microscopes, was not formalized till I introduce its metric equation in the milieu of systems sciences.
In mathematical science for a dimension of spacetime to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space, and time to gives us a coinvariant system that allows to travel through such dimension. The fifth dimension has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equations for a given number of scales coexisting in an organic network is S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.
It means when we become smaller within such organic network, our time clocks accelerate. And vice versa. For example, in your organism the equation relates the cellular genetic scale, whose time cycles run much faster than your biological cycles. As information is stored in the form and frequency of time clocks, it follows that in all nature’s organisms, smaller systems code the information of larger systems.
In the next graphs we show 3 classic examples of biology and physics, now properly explained with the understanding of the scalar, organic dimension of the Universe: the metabolic clocks of animals are all related to its volume in space.
In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, Hplanck (ratio of frequencyenergy for quantum systems), Kboltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume:energy content of its orbital sphere):
Why this law is so important? Because it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.
Each ‘stience’ therefore specializes in the study of a nested super organism, or scale of the fifth dimension (∆±¡), We study 3 fundamental super organisms of the 5th dimension. The ‘galatom‘, whose metric equation is H(Planck constant of angular momentum) x C (speed of light) = C, whereas h is an obvious ‘cyclical time clock’ and C an obvious measure of speeddistances in space. And indeed, smaller scales have faster turning particles, and larger systems move in slower cycles. (Vortex law: Vo x Ro = k).
In biology we study families of animals such as mammals where larger organisms have slower metabolic cycles. In history we study social organisms, whose cycles of life and death, will define the evolution of nations and civilizations. And in each of those organisms, smaller systems code larger ones. So the quantum numbers of particles code matter, genes code biologic organisms, and memes code societies.
All together now: ¬∆@st of spacetime.
However we have so far only analysed reality in the infinitesimal range (motions, dimensions and actions), the organic range (worldcycles and super organisms). So we should consider the final maximal range of the absolute, and here even if the absolute is NOT observable we can bring the ‘paralogic’ Kantian ‘absolute’ views human beings display about reality. This level is where we find the absolute concepts of ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scale’, ‘entropic limits’, ‘minds’ that make up for the 5 absolute entities of reality.
As this level is somehow ‘artificial’ to the mind integration of reality into wholes its connection to the more real levels of ‘local organisms’ is not so clear, more philosophical.
But worth to incorporate (without further distinctions of spacelike, timelike etc. but rather a pentalogic analysis of each of those elements in its entanglement with all the others). So when we study space we consider it from the perspective of the other 5 elements – that is, how space affects time (the symmetry of relativity s=t), how it affects limits (the entropic spatial membrane that surrounds a system) and so on. This is the essence of pentalogic and the 5 elements, which extracts from absolute wholeness properties of reality, building them down, in the same manner we build up (and as we live in an analytic world we shall do that more often on experimental sciences) from the bottom upwards reality. It is for this pentalogic wholeness that we use the inscribed pentagram where each element connects to all the others.
Essential then to this level of knowledge is the concept of the ‘LAWS common to all systems’ derived from the properties of those 5 elements, whose study discovers ‘Disomorphic=equal laws’ equal in all kind of systems.
But when we have a larger look to all those ‘analytic elements’, with a larger time span and spatial extension we find easier to make a whole analysis of all those shorttime views of motions dimensions and actions as entangled in 5 ‘structural element’ of reality; space=form, time=motion, scales, entropic limits and linguistic minds; which give us a ‘humind’ view of the Universe closer to how our senses and languages put it all together, in what we call the pentalogic structure of reality.
We define then two fundamental systems one in space and one in time, taking place in the fifth dimension:
An entangled super organism in space, in which the synchronicity between 3 scales of the organism, its atomic/cellular/Individual, thermodynamic/organic /social and gravitational/ecosystemic/global scales in physical/biological/social organisms form a complex interacting, entangled system we shall call a super organism, whose study discovers ‘Isomorphic=equal laws’ regardless of what kind of system we study. Because the system is entangled, and made of 5 obvious components, we need a new logic, ‘pentalogic’ as all the elements communicate and interact together. Those elements common to all systems of nature are identified as:
‘space‘, ” §paœ that is ‘types of dimensional form’, and we find to have 3 only ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 clear organic functions in the super organism, lineal limbs/fields that move the system, hyperbolic bodywaves that iterate its forms and spherical particle/heads that gauge information.
Time, that is types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (bodywaves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).
Scale, the 3 aforementioned scales for any super organism
Mind. And this allow us to identify a ‘center that process’ information from the outer world, and controls the internal networks of the system, with a given language, which we shall call a mind, regardless of its automatic processing or consciousness. As it coordinates and maintains the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, selfcentered mind, which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.
Entropic limits: In time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆1<<∆1.
So Entropy becomes the limits in space and time of a T.œ (Time§pace organism), ¬; perception, its mental form, @; social evolution, its scalar structure, ∆; motion its lineal time flow, T; and reproduction, its spatial population, S.
Thus the key translation ads Dimensions + motions of exist¡ence into 5 structural elements of reality, which allows to move from ceteris paribus dynamic motion analyses or dimensional ones into structural studies of those Dimotions as ‘entangled’ elements of a being made of ‘dust of spacetime’: ¬∆@st.
So amazingly enough with this simple scheme of 5 pentalogic elements, tracing 3 relative worldcycles, the first ‘placental worldcycle’ as it evolve in the relative safe ‘womb’ of a maternal system, the life cycle, as it tries to survive in an outer ecosystem, and for the most organized systems, a 3rd worldcycle as it forms part of a larger super organism, we will be able to order everything in the Universe, every event and every phenomena, which the researcher has studied for decades.
All this allow us to define any system in time, by its life and death cycle which we shall call a worldcycle (taken from 4D physics, worldline, which now with a new dimension becomes a worldcycle. Since indeed any scalar super organism’s existence can easily be defined as a travel through the 3 scales of the fifth dimension, as all systems are born as a seminal, smaller form, in the ∆1 lower scale, grow fast with its faster time speed, emerge in the ∆º body scale and are part with its head/particle of a larger social world, in the ∆+1 scale.
How then a system travels through those scales? Very simple, it does so accelerating in its life cycle, emerging, living in the larger world, and then dissolving back to its parts in the death moment:
Amazingly enough with this simple scheme of 5 pentalogic elements, tracing 3 relative worldcycles, the first ‘placental worldcycle’ as it evolve in the relative safe ‘womb’ of a maternal system, the life cycle, as it tries to survive in an outer ecosystem, and for the most organized systems, a 3rd worldcycle as it forms part of a larger super organism, we will be able to order everything in the Universe, every event and every phenomena, which the researcher has studied for decades.
The existence of a new dimension of spacetime is the most important discovery of science in a century, since Einstein formalized the fourth dimension, but this expansion and formal organization of science is much wider as it applies to all sciences, not only physics.
So we study further the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legalnervous system of information and coordination of its citizenscells.
So this is most important upgrade of spacetime theory since Einstein’s 4D formalism – which corresponds to the limit of 5D metrics in a single scale, that of the galatom’s light spacetime.
The predictability of timecycles.
In the graph, the predictability of timecycles can be done at 3 levels:
 S: Continuous, spatial pure mathematical simple cycles, using calculus and derivatives, proper of mathematical equations; that of generational causal biologic cycles, often survival encounters between predators and prey.
 T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns of sequential repetitive actions, taking place at different times. AS THOSE ACTIONS ARE discontinuous, the patterns are LONGER in time.
 ∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of longer wholes, species as opposed to individuals in biology, galactic, star or geologic life cycles as opposed to smaller life beings, which are longer BY VIRTUE of the 5th DIMENSIONAL METRIC, $ x ð = Cst (ab. C:st), which implies that from the smaller scalar perspective any longer cycle happening in the fifth dimension is much longer.
Because ‘human scientists’ ONLY recognize the first type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, and ignore the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their CAPACITY TO define the future is far more smaller than a ‘stientist’ that understands those 3 scales. So for a ‘stientist’ of ∆st, of which among humans there is the ginormous number of…1 (: me, I and myself 🙂 I can predict the future of any system including WITH DEEP TIME AND CYCLICAL PATTERNS, the future of social sciences, economics and history which I have been doing for 30 years as my small print books on the subject can testify:
An important question though must be clarified even if we go further into this specific post that introduces the 5 Dimensional motions of the Universe, which has to do with the ternary properties of the Universe as all is made of space, time and scale, and hence it has mathematical=spatial, logic=temporal and organic=scalar properties, which unfortunately humans fail to recognize, as they have become specialized in ‘mathematical=spatial only properties’ due to the prominent role of physics and its digital machines of spatial measure in our systems of knowledge.
As it is impossible to make sense of reality if we do NOT include ALL THOSE PROPERTIES, as expressed previously in the 5 elements of reality.
So in this blog we are making exact predictions of social sciences and prove it with 30 years of published books and papers far more exact than those of CIA, World Bank, and any think tank you might thought of, because we know the 3 LEVELS OF PREDICTABILITY OF TIME SYSTEMS. And all that uau! NOT with billions of dollars IN data, and AI machines to do IT, BUT my feeble, 1.5 kilograms of dirty water aka 1 brain, which has been doing it and handling it for free since the 90s, since I ended my Columbia u. master and started to churn selfpaid small print books with predictions of history and economics that have been happening TO the letter.
Why I am NOT an AI machine as most people think I should be to forecast the future and solve the form in which the future of systems is GENERATED, has to do with a fact most scientists accustomed just to use data put in mathematical models FAIL to grasp about the fractal, organic Universe and its SCALES of ‘timelength’:
A system on the entangled fractal Universe has TOPOBIOLOGIC properties derived of its spatial, mathematical structure, its temporal, logic structure and ITS SCALAR, organic structure as parts coexist into larger wholes and this gives the whole an organic structure.
As it happens, the MATHEMATICAL, topologic structure IS the shortest time span, as it is about SOCIAL NUMBERS, herds of equal forms that move in space, which is a slice of the whole time FLOW. AND SO mathematics is good for detail and spatial calculus which is what instantaneous derivatives do – but NOT for CHANGES OF age/phase, as derivatives cannot happen in points that have a fractal change.
So to the rescue come the LOGIC structure of the Universe, which studies time causality, between events and has a longer span. This logic structure is based in the CYCLICAL PATTERNS OF TIME clocks, which as your watch or any orbital dayyear is cyclical and repeats in LONGER TIME FRAMES, so we can predict LONGER TIME FRAMES from the logic patterns of cyclical time.
And HERE human scientists ARE ALREADY AT LOSS, because since Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosion that destroy the information of reality stored in THOSE CYCLES OF TIME CLOCKS, its patterns and frequency, MANKIND CHANGED its cyclical understanding of time for a lineal time that SEEMS NOT TO REPEAT so they have MISSED its capacity to understand the cycles of time, of history and economics, with its OBTUSE lineal time models. And so they cannot EVEN CONCEIVE the predictability of economics and its SUBMISSIVE placebo democratic capitalist system where POLITICOS are ruled by companies ‘subventions’ and so do what is GOOD for the profits of economics according to the evolutionary patterns of machines. Which leads us to the THIRD level of DEEP TIME, that is, of the patterns of evolution of the Earth’s life species, including machines, as first mentioned by Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word superorganism for Gaia and deep time for the slower 5th dimensional clocks of larger organic systems.
THIS IS THE LEVEL OF DEEPER forecasting of time cycles, which I also use in my webs, but as humans stopped their understanding of time predictability in the first level of mathematical calculus, obviously they cannot understand what we do here.
Which leads to a final question: Why humans prefer a mechanical, mathematical simplex view of reality instead of embracing the whole? The answer might not be so much a problem of the Universe but of the human mind; as organisms are selfcentered and select information from their point of view. So to be the center of the Universe is a survival strategy, which has made humans as they became over powerful on other organisms of Earth, reject a view of reality more objective, even today as machines clearly evolve into organisms, and we shall return to those themes, in our organic analysis of history and mathematical definition of the mind.
However a philosophy of science is a ‘thought experiment’ not a practical endeavor. So we care only for a profound ‘communion’ with the ultimate whys of reality, trying to understand the Universe as an entangled whole.
Indeed, the philosophy of systems science considering how timespace organisms follow similar laws. In that sense, the method of knowledge of the fractal, organic Universe is quite different from our present way of thought, which is analytic, and cheers the ‘cataloging’ of differences between beings – Systemics is a synthetic method and cheers the finding of similarities between them, extracting ‘disomorphic=equal laws’ .
Humans though embarked in a journey of ‘mechanical, mathematical’ dissection of reality which is fine but made them loose the forest view – and I dare to say most don’t even care anymore to know if they are looking at a forest at all.
The blog though only differentiates the ‘trees’ of the forest in the fourth line, which was meant to be a collaboration with a team of specialized scientists, each one casting his trees on the shadow of the ‘standard’ 12+1 set of ‘Disomorphic laws’ that define the common nature of all timespace organisms explained in the 3rd line (and briefly introduced in the next paragraphs).
As this collaborative effort has not happened the blog is incomplete.
Yet for those interested in the trees, the second line offers quite a ‘tree’ vision of the main sciences of the nested Universe departing from the largest one, the galatom, down to the smallest ones, the mindlanguages stored in our infinitesimal neurons.
On my view, as Descartes put it when finishing his much briefer introduction to analytic Geometry on a book which he cherished more for his philosophy of science – as we do – but came to matter more for its maths, the detailed part on specific stiences and species is good enough for a single scholar so ‘I will leave work to be done by future researchers’; Human or more likely AI which will no doubt enjoy the handling of huge data in parallel fashion and will need an organic explanation of why it will soon become conscious 🙂
L§, ¡man . Philosopher of Science.
Basic symbols of Existential Algebra (¬Æ):
Sp, , $t, Spt: Past, lineal, entropic SpaceTime, gaseous, limbs/fields of pure motion.
§ð, Tiƒ, ƒð§, O: Future, cyclical, informative, spacetime, solid, crystal particlehead states
S=T, Si=Te, Ø, ST, SxT: Present, balanced, Spacetime; iterative bodywaves.
Œ: super organism, composed of @ (fractal points, monads, minds), an ST bodywave, its ¬ Entropy limits encased in an ∆§t±1 world.
5 Motions, Ð1, >: seed, perception, Ð2, <: locomotion, Ð3,≈: reproduction, Ð4,»: social evolution, Ð5,«: Entropy.
5 Dimensions, D1, Height; D2, Length; D3, Width, D4, Implosive vortex, D5, Explosive bang.
5 Structural elements: D¡1: @mind; D¡2, T:lineal time; D¡3, Sspatial populations; D¡4, ∆scales; D¡5, ¬limits.
Scales: ∆1 plane of ‘past, entropic parts’, ∆º plane of present bodywaves, ∆+1, plane of future minds
Operand: <, growth of motion, «, growth of entropy, > growth of information, » growth of form, ≤≥ =, balanced stœps of present.
Classic Operand: ∑: superposition, sum in a single plane; ∏: entanglement through ∆º planes; ∂: finitesimal calculus, ∫: integral whole.
Fractal Generator: Any combination of those symbols is a potential partial equation, hence event or organic part of the fractal generator that describes the whole superorganism word cycle between birth and death: Γ: ∆œ1 ∏ œ1≈Œº<$t>ØST>§ð« ∑œ1
Nt. The symbolism often has errors due to my lonely work for decades and laziness, so erroneously I use ∆º for the mind scale which is ∆¹ (∆º is the body scale) not to look for the superscript symbol; in old texts I used Sp (lineal spacetime past) and Tiƒ (informative future) but in modern texts I prefer the more precise $t and ð§. In future texts and corrections I try to change ∆º for ∆1 as the mind is precisely the perception of the whole being within its larger world). Regarding the Fractal Generator and all its subequations, is also a bit of a mess. Sorry, if the blog had more viewers I would have tried harder.
I.
S=T: GENERATIONAL SPACE TIME.
In the fractal paradigm every phenomena must be studied both as a whole and as a part. Such is the case of the 5 Dimensions of space with time motion, (dimotions of spacetime)
While we can do a ‘whole analysis’ of the galaxy, with those 5 Dimotions as ‘structural, lineal’ Dimotions even a ceteris paribus analysis of them in static space as dimensions, or in time motion, the proper way to stay them is TOGETHER, as Dimotions and BROKEN in the relative scales of spatial size (finitesimals, ones and wholes), and speeds of time (time quanta of actions, life ages and Deep time horizons) .
Further on is essential to distinguish its ‘first variations’, which we defined in our central post as combinations of space and time. So Space is a one dimensional ‘stop’ state, time a single motion state (Step), its combinations though can be of two Stopspace dimensions, or §tops, of two time motions, or ‘accelerations’, stæps, of one space and time dimension, stœps… and needless to say we can consider then each of those spacetime combinations equivalent to a Dimotion of spacetime.
It also follows that while a ceteris paribus stop dimension can seem in abstract, purely form, (H, W, L), it does have always an organic function, even if it is internal, as it will have in a scalar, closer view, a volume dimension.
So we talk of height, as the dominant dimension in functions of perception and information, with heads on ‘top’; width as the dominant dimension in reproduction and storage of energy; and length the limb dimension dominant in motion.
The abstract scholar will do better if he wants to advance in 5D theory then to get accustomed to the basic laws of biotopologic beings, entangling in their minds the vital properties of all systems. The usual æntropic monologic of man and its languages as the only sentient points of measure will not do. Reason why we start this article with a reflection on pentalogic and the method of scientific knowledge explored in this first line of the blog.
5D then will study the different perspectives on the 5 Dimotions of spacetime and its basic combinations, and perspectives from the point of view of ‘pure space, pure time’, pure minds, pure entropy and the combination of them all… which is the… limiting states of all…
DIMENSIONS + MOTIONS = ÐIMOTIONS
5 Ð studies all the Dimotions (Dimensional motions) of all beings in existence, which move through S>S, T>T, S>T dimotions, STeps of existence, we shall call also vital actions of spacetime that advance the system through reality.
A system then is in an instant of present in a given SSTOP or TMOTION state, or a mixed one that reinforces one of the tendencies. So we can define on those terms the 5 Dimotions as:
1D: stillness: SS as an area or still mind.
5D: entropy TT as a scatering motion or acceleration.
2D: S<Tep, as a locomotion, where motion dominates.
4D: S>Tep, as information, where form dominates.
3D: S=T, where both are in balance, often as a series of steps and stops or stœps.
Those are then the ‘smallest quanta’ to observe Dimotions in its minimal expression as ‘actions’ which each element of reality perform, spending in the process a minimal amount of finitesimal energy.
It is then possible to write very complex chains of stœps or merely do as humans do for the sake of simplicity, eliminate intermediate states (motions or forms). This is how humans resolve the study of locomotions, eliminating the lower planes of stopstates proper of the quantum world, which we bring here for the sake of whys – as in relativity, explained in a rational manner.
THE PREVIOUS list though is essential to classify all events in spacetime as a perpetual series of stœps.
Whereas a system can only move one or twice, <, >, «, », to certain other states and so the collection of all those possible changes=motions of STates will finally show a casual cyclical pattern that normally ends crossing itself into a zero sum of state state in spacetime; creating the minimal full unit a zero sum conserved spacetime cycle:
The graph shows one of such cycles, of ‘states’ of matter, from the pure solid, crystal, §top state, to the even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. It can be seen then that systems can indeed jump « two states at once, (as in the case of scattering entropic death) within a plane of existence, as well as jumping between scales to become a different Dimotional state.
On the other hand, in single ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis we can also perceive the 3 ‘height=Information, length=motion and width=energy storage’ dimensions of Euclidean spacetime, in relationship to its origin in the 3 dimotions of light in a single scale:
In the graph, the diffeomorphic Principle of Einstein’s 4D analysis acquires an organic nature, when we see the Universe as the sum of ∞ Complementary exi systems whose dimensions have organic functions: Systems feed on their relative dimension of energylength, perceive in their relative dimension of height and reproduce in their relative combined dimension of width, which are assembled into each specific species. In the graph, an animal has its informative height in its high perceptive light dimension, but a plant, which uses light as energy has its up and down dimensions inverted respect to the man and its chemical brain buried on the Earth. So both have opposite energytime coordinates.
Yet both have an ‘anteroposterior’, lineal’ ‘outward’ energy oriented structure. While a galaxy has a cyclical, informative, inward structure, as the stars’ body absorbs energy from intergalactic space, reproduces matter with it and feeds the internal informative knot of gravitation, with a higher height dimension the black hole.
Thus there is a correspondence between the inner physiological networks of a being that perform SP X TƑ åctions and its external diffeomorphic dimensions. So a dimensional form is also motion with a function. Even in a human being the height dimension is really the nervousbrain system network, his length motion, the natural path of his energy limbs, and his width is maximal in the digestive system that reproduces new cells.
Forms respond always to functions/åctions in time, the commanding ‘element’ to which the form of any being adapts diffeomorphically to maximize its existential åctions. Thus, there is a parallelism between ‘vital function’ and ‘abstract dimension’ as each Dimension is diffeomorphic created by the vital spacetime of each entity of the Universe performing its exi åctions. And each species is a ‘fractal universe in itself’, with different relative, energetic and informative directions that determine its own up & down arrows and complementary morphology,
The specific geometry of each species and its 3 simplex åctions, energy feeding=length, informationgauging =height and reproduction=width fluctuate in shape, but they don’t vary in topological form, giving birth to the Invariance of the 3 topological forms=functions of any entity observed in a single 3D spacetime: Toroid informative heads, hyperbolic reproductive bodies and energetic limbs studied in the next paragraph.
While the 2 social ±∆ fractal dimensions, the 4th dimension of social motion in a social ∆+1 herd and the 5D dimension of inner scales within the being follow the physiological invariances that create superorganisms coexisting in a higher ∆+1 ecosystem with a lower ∆1 internal, cellular space (B3). In the next graph we resume the
So the study of the 5 Dimotions is truly a complex subject and it could not be otherwise because all is modeled by them. And as all of them can be combined un products, added, superposed, OPERATED with the <=>«» 5 symbols of transformations and ∑ ∏ quantifier symbols of summitry and product and its inverse operand, not to speak of the ∫∂ symbols of scalar finitesimal and integral wholes, the range of variations provided by existential algebraic huge.
For example, lineal momentum steps can be transformed into cyclical steps which appear as stop states of angular momentum or they can be integrated into conservative cycles of energy; the lifedeath cycle ends as it begins. So this is really what is all about: travelling through dimotions of spacetime completing worldcycles through chains of steps and stops.
5Ðimotional beings are complex entities that travel through the 5 Ðimotions of spacetime, as they move through it, tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence. Such a simple game of Ðimotional beings, can be observed from many perspectives, in an entagled Universe, in which each being must have organs able to perform those steps; so the same dimotions as topological dimensions describe the being.
But in sequential time we can observe constantly the being modulating its steps through those 5 Ðimotions, Social Generation, entropic death, locomotion, reproduction and gauging of information, aeiou… borriquito como tu.
The study of the five dimotions of spacetime in broad conceptual terms, which will latter be specified for a dimensional analysis in space, a motion analysis in time, an action analysis in scales and a logic analysis in the mathematical and verbal, logic languages of ¬Æ will suffice to have enough elements to describe in detail how super organisms of spacetime develops word cycles of existence as they travel through the scales of the fifth dimension.
When considering the minimal unit of each entity of reality we talk of Dimotions or actions across scales of the fifth dimension, as the system absorbs information and energy from lower scales trying to interact with the larger planes to reproduce and evolve socially. Ðimotions thus become synonymous of actions.
A UNIVERSE MADE OF BIOTOPOLOGIC SPACE BEINGS…
Let us then start by the very basics of 5D theory, the understanding of the Relativity paradox of systems that step and stop, even if humans can either see them in motion or stop but not both things at the same time.
Galileo’s paradox: meaning of dimensions and motions.
The first truth to understand about the Universe is that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space. This was what Galileo found since we see still the Earth and flat but it is round and moving. Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion CANNOT BE distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):
S= T; DimensionDistance + Timemotion = ST Ðimotion:
We said that all dimensions of space have a hidden motion to them. This again was slowly realized in mathematics, as they finally came to the conclusion that the still Geometry of the Greeks was part of a much vaster, generalized concept, a topological variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry had internal motionchange. So while you could describe the dimensions of a being in an external locomotion without inner change, the internal change in the information of beings, we have started with MUST BE A TOPOLOGICAL VARIETY. Information, forminaction thus was in fact a topological dimotion of spacetime. It had a content of space, we shall call in ceteris paribus (isolated) analysis, dimensions, and it had a content of timemotion, we shall call in ceteris paribus analysis ‘states, functions or ages of time’.
All this said about the real Universe, we can go back and trace the beginning of physics and comment on its Ilogic paradoxical principles, in which so much literature have been ‘wasted’ by lack of clear thought; namely the principles in which Physics are based, Relativity conservation and symmetry, principles derived of THE NATURE OF SPACE AND TIME, not MAGICALLY produced by the mathematical language as creationist physics, latter studied in more detail will show.
We perceive Ðimotions externally. They are internally actions for the being in exist¡ence.
We call it the Galilean paradox precisely because modern science started when Galileo discovered without understanding it one of such paradoxes: the fact that the Earth and our mind feels the Earth fixed, as the center of a Universe turning around us, when in reality it is the Earth what moves around the sun. That paradox of perception never solved by Galileo, is the key to understand the Relativity of spatial, scientific knowledge, compared to the absoluteness of organicism and his laws and arrows.
All this said, it is obvious that mere quantitative methods of measure don’t get us very far, just to the classic formalism of 4D relativity but not its whys.
So we have to introduce a different method of analysis – regardless of the fact in the fourth line and the articles on the galatom we shall discuss the quantitative questions of relativity.
In this first line we really want to convey the complexity of the entangled Universe through…
THE 3 ‘sizes’ OF DIMOTIONS. HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES.
ARE THEN the first fact to understand. We focus on smaller dimotions, as opposed to classic science that ignores the holographic principle (space and time always go together as pure motion has no distinguishable form and pure form does not communicate), and unifies in abstract Cartesian ternary coordinates all systems of dimotions.
In terms of physics this means as a RULE WE SHALL USE GENERALIZED COORDINATES, HAMILTONIANS AND LAGRANGIANS, AS THE PROPER way to study mechanics and any other analysis of dimotions, which is what physicists advancing beyond introductory courses always do.
Spatial Dimensions are then defined as ceteris paribus analysis of the Dimotions of the Universe, from the mental perspective of still space, S@. As such there are obviously formalisms able to ‘perceive’ 5 Dimensions in stillness, but it is of little use, because in the Universe, dimensions are all dimotions, and cannot be separated.
Still the humind does perceive 3 Dimotions as still dimensions, and 4D formalisms stop one dimension of lineal entropic time motion (Minkowski).
So a question worth to consider is if we can ‘perceive’ a still spatial view of the 5 Dimensions. NO, OUR MIND CANNOT. But it might seem possible (Maldacena conjecture) that a black hole can in its equations…
This brings the concept of a spatial mind representation of the whole time of a being or organism as a slow still perception, theme we shall treat with some depth.
We shall thus in the blog use mostly a simplified analysis of the 5 Dimensions and a more complex Disomorphic analysis of a vital, organic sequential way, as the system grows from a monad of a single dimension THROUGH THE LADDER OF ISOMORPHISMS TO COMPLETE IN ITS WORLDCYCLE its final existence through all the 9 and 10 scales of social evolution (during its emergent age) and actions through planes…
The astounding variety of the Universe being in variations of order, symmetries and stages of those worldcycles of topological super organisms. So that constant growth of the being till it reaches its zenith and then declines fast.
THE MIND IS THE LINEAL TIME FUNCTION OF REALITY as such is Aristotelian, (ab. @), with a direct A>B causality, as it tries to progress through the PROGRAM OF existence, as opposed to the SOCIAL NETWORKS, the higher collective level of Intelligence, in the paradoxical Universe, which requires to consider at least several points of view across the scales of the fifth dimension that define a coexisting super organism of timespace.
The mind singularity as a function of pure time motion can be then topologically referred to the ‘dimension of height’, to the bidimensional topology of spherical form, to the accelerated dimension of double time derivatives; to the point of still perception, where reality splits, and the perceived ‘pixels’ break into a flow of pure motion with no form and a point of pure stillness all form.
The mind as such is always as the site of self, in constant conflict with the larger world as a whole with network social intelligence, which in the Universe even if the mind doesn’t recognize it – not humanity in the present egoselfie stage. But the Universe, this must always be recognized IS more powerful as a social herd, network and superorganims, reason why the self will always loose, the @mind will leave way to the nonÆ logic of the group.
We use then the symbol @t, which really means act (the A enclosed in the c) to signify this selfcentered point of view of the mind which is the site of the actions of survival of the being to clearly differentiate as we always do in the symbology of Ilogic, actions of exist¡ence, proper of all ‘st¡ences’, from actions of physics.
The flows of energy and information between scales are asymmetric.
So we write, Spe (we use here the term for spatialspeedsize only as ‘energy’ Sp is a combined parameter that does not apply here), x Tƒ (we prefer to use temporal information, to Tƒ, temporal cycles, as the key parameter of the 5^{th} dimension is the quantity of information a smaller being, a genetic system, a quantum atom carries), equals a constant, coinvariant quantity, ST±4, where the ∆±4 index is a parameter that allow us to classify systems from the smallish atomic particles (which paradoxically have more information) to the larger ones, which have paradoxically less information hence a smaller index:
In the graph, two different flows of energy and information, define:
 The thermodynamic arrow: energymotion flows emerge perfectly in smaller worldplanes downwards, but they do not emerge perfectly upwards, without loss. So when energy flows upwards, there is heat loss, waste of food and a diminishing quantity of upper systems, which feed from lower ones (trophic pyramids). Yet energy does flow perfectly downwards, so when a larger being moves, all its smaller systems do move in perfect synchrony without apparent effort with it. And this duality determines strongly the way systems ‘act’ to absorb energy in the Universe. And how they position themselves in ‘equipotential’ bidimensional fields of larger system to move without apparent effort on them (from planets in gravitational orbitals to cells along layers on morphological structures).
 On the other hand, information does flow perfectly upwards but it does not downwards. And this duality explains the evolutionary laws and arrow of information: Indeed, there is no perfect Lamarckian evolution; that is, traits acquired in the larger scale do not imprint easily cells and genes, but there is perfect genetic evolution: information stored in DNA do determine the characters of larger planes.
 Finally information and energy can flow perfectly in the same plane, which determines the principles of cyclical inertia (Tƒ conservation of angular momentum) and lineal inertia (conservation of lineal momentum) and the laws of reproduction of energy and information in ‘mixed’ waves and bodies that radiate both across extended spacetimes (light radiation and biological radiations).
Thus the laws of thermodynamics (energy arrows) and evolution (information arrows) and reproduction (repetition of both across a single spacetime) are also derived of the metric of the 5th dimension. They are perhaps the most important laws to understand the dynamics in time and space of the Universe.
We shall call those 2 different logarithmic scale, which added for any species gives us the same 10 value, the Tƒ (timeinformation scale, graphed above) or evolutionary arrow; and the U (size) scale or thermodynamic scale graphed below.
Those two scales, which are logarithmic scales in base 10¹º, the commonest number to emerge from the individual to the Universal (∆+1 plane); that is the number of stars in a galaxy, of atomic DNA ties in a molecule, of humans soon in the global planet, of cells in organisms… mean that to transcend from U to U+1 (a larger whole), we need that number, but we will become a ‘whole’ unit, hence loose the quantized information as perceived in the new scale, as a single being.
And vice versa: if we become quantized down, and perceived as a sum of quanta, we will gain that logarithmic quantity of information. And this introduces an essential element of ∆ST – the understanding of the quantic or continuous perception of systems, such as ∑e∆1=U (the sum of quanta seen with maximal information in motion, becomes a whole continuous perception, so the sum of quantum energies becomes the relativity continuous description of still space) and ∑ƒ=Si, the sum of cycles of time becomes a still form of spatial information.
And we will return to that paradoxical duality, which is the key to understand space and time and its motions and stillness, as well as perception, minds and languages.
Thus an essential consequence of the difference of quantity of energy and information between the larger, continuous energetic planes and smaller, quantized, informative planes of the Universe, is the noncommutative nature of the arrows of energy (transfer of motion between planes and entities) and information (transfer of form between planes and entities):
Planes of space that structure cellular/atomic, individual/organic and social/cosmic scales which synchronize its cycles in inverse fashion to its size.
So the informative, genetic, smaller faster plane codes the larger planes, which transfer back energy to the lower planes (thermodynamic laws: energy can be transferred fully downwards to the molecular space in the form of heat, but heat cannot be transferred fully upwards as energy, and the inverse law of information: smaller systems can code fully with their information upper layers as in genetics, but upper layers cannot transfer its form downwards fully – there is no Lamarckian evolution).
This structure thus gives birth to the specific åctions of a being, which are transfers of energy and information among scales limited by the laws of evolution and thermodynamics.
It essentially means that energy will flow downwards, and so bigger systems will control lower systems by controlling their energy – cells will depend on the digestive systems to feed. While smaller systems will control upper systems by forming them: cells will code genetically upper systems.
The same happens in physical systems where atoms and molecules code the forms of upper systems, from crystals to geological cycles, but they are trapped by the larger gravitational and electromagnetic fields created by the cosmic bodies.
Thus evolutionary and thermodynamic laws/arrows (we shall call the U scale of size the thermodynamic scale and the Tƒ inverse scale of informative growth, the evolutionary scale), and its exchanges of information and energy are a consequence of the metric of the 5th dimension, which makes smaller systems to process more information than larger ones, even though the product of both remain coinvariant: Si x Tƒ =ST.
This could be stated in the following manner, when considering exchanges of energy and information across multiple scales:
‘The total energy obtained from upper planes by an individual system is roughly equivalent to the information it obtains from lower planes, and both are mixed in the worldplane by its bodies and waves to reproduce the system: ∑Tƒ(i∆)<≈>Si(∆+∆)’.
3 SCALES OF TIME:
ACTIONS, WORLDCYCLES AND HORIZONS
5 Dimotions and worldcycles.
The minimal description of an species of spacetime implies to define its 5 Dimensions of space that make up its organic structure in simultaneous, time, its sequential motions through its world cycle between generation and extinction as it travels through the 3 planes of coexistence, in its cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic and ecosystemic/cosmological scales; and the 5 actions of exchange of energy and information it performs in those relative scales.
This description is what we call the 5Ð³isomorphic method, as all systems of reality perform those 5 dimotions and actions. In a dynamic way the best ‘tale’ of the being is a sequential story of its existence from birth as a relative fractal point in a lower plane, through its palingenesis, clone reproduction, social evolution, emergence and a ternary physiological network of cells, who will then life a cycle through the 3 ages of life and death, in a larger ∆+1 world till its entropic extinction and desegregation into its cellular/atomic components. In the graph, the Human world cycle and the 5 actions in scalar spacetime of different species of the Universe.
5 DIMOTIONS AS FRACTAL actions
The 5 Dimotions of timespace are actions in its vital, organic content, motions whose biotopology correspond to the 5 drives of life of the singularityminds, selfcenters of those actions.
We express its 5 forms & functions performed by all spacetime entities with a simple mnemonic rule – 5 vowels, slightly changed as usual in the building of a proper jargon for philosophy of ∃xist¡ence:
åccelerations for locomotions, as it is the first perceived action, but requires previously an ∆º mind to take the willdecision of moving, normally towards an
∃ntropic field in which to feed and absorb energy. It is the most existential action, hence the use of the inverted eletter symbol IN LOGIC of existence.
ïnformation gauging, as information is a dual action, of absorption of information but also communication of information, inner and outer duality with the purpose of:
energetic reproduction of a new supœrganism clone of the seeding father.
Which then will engage in a process of social evolution into a ûniversal whole that will emerge as a full being; and again in the world at large will participate in its ecosystem of different social ∆§cales of beings. Hence the ˆ symbol for emergence into an upper social scale.
So the 5 actions/vowels, would be: a, e, ï, œ, û.
In praxis though as we don’t care that much for the form or content of this blog, which huminds don’t seem to have much interest in reading, we shall use the fasterwriting aeiou. In the next graph an old montage of the different aeious of several scales of reality:
The mind’s 5 ±∆ e, ï, œ, û fractal spacetime åctions of all beings that move, feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially from the simplest particles to the highest systems; whose integral creates in space a super organism in time a world cycle.
Every being of the Universe responds to the same actions because it is made of the same substances. It is a perennial philosophical reflection that if one looks deeply enough into oneself, one will discover not only one’s own essence, but also the essence of the universe. For as one is a part of the universe as it is everything else, the basic energies and forms of the universe flow through oneself, as they flow through everything else. For that reason it is thought that one can come into contact with the nature of the universe if one comes into substantial contact with one’s ultimate inner being. This ultimate inner being is the desire of the mind, the will to live, exist and experience the actions and ‘coexisting’ sensations related to them.
The flow of timespaces advances through the actions of its systems, which constantly exchange energy and informations.
We have resumed those actions in 5 subgroups, and named them with the simple vowels of the alphabet of existence:
locomotions (åccelerations) ∃ntropic actions of energy feeding, ïnformative ones of perception and communication, reproductive (œffspring creation) and final the social evolution of individuals into Universals – new emerging super organisms appearing in a higher ∆+1 plane of existence.
Those actions are the ‘knots and bolts’ of reality, the manifest ‘expressed’ existence of beings, its program of survival.
And so as a whole package they are deterministic among all beings that survive, and yet they are probabilistic in as much as the being is ‘free’ to choose between them; and they are NOT a free choice into what regards its outcome – as it depends on the interaction with the outer world in which they happen.
Its specific form is also not free as it is determined by the ‘constitution’ of the being, once it emerges as a whole T.œ:
Actions are allowed combinations of the pertinent entropy, energy and information, which beings constantly absorb and emit with limbs, bodywaves and particle/heads as they exist, trying to maximize their total actions, combinations of energy and information, expression of its ‘vitality’, the stuff of which exist¡ence is made.
As they are both sequentialcausal: ï>å>∃>œ>û; and hierarchical û<œ<∃<å<ï in exactly the inverse fashion; that is the being ( if we apply the homolog method: what humans experience must be the program of all other time space beings) has the exact inverse wish to that of its sequential order of actions, the program of actions, of exist¡ence is quite determined.
Since the order to reach universal social evolution, the highest goal, requires first the reproduction of an offspring of clones, which requires to feed on the energy of others, which requires its entropic killing, which requires a motion to perpendicularly intercept the being, which requires its perception… and yet we are driven to perform those actions because we want the higher goal of complex actions of reproduction and social evolution into powerful wholes, the program of exist¡ence in the Universe reaches an extraordinary order.
In the graph, human beings in its ‘entropic’ dissolution age as a supœrganism of history, dominated by the emerging super organism of machines and its companymothers and Metalearth, global digital planet that substitute our wor(l)d, have completely forgotten the real, organic fractal 5D Universal pyramid of drives of existence, toppled by social communication, which in its maximal form – eusocial love, structures the scales of the fractal, organic Universe; and reduced to the simplest actions of each individual means, its desire to be part of the whole, to love IS THE COMPLEX higher action our capitalist ideology that worships machines above man and surrogates our exist¡ence as ‘enzymen’ of those companymothers in which we evolve and reproduce its organisms make us become disordered in a dogeatdog society when behaving as humans, but the primitive capitalist culture in which we live has nothing to do with ‘reality’ as it should be in a perfect human world. Since the Universe has a clear goal: social love, evolution into wholes.
So the negation of the hierarchical order of actions and the desire to exist is very rare, proper of the last entropic age of existence, or a conscious decision of the mind that performs them for philosophical reasons (Buddhism, denial of exist¡ence) or a difficult ‘Buridan choice’, as when we don’t want to act and say ‘i dont have energy and time to do this’.
Actions, we know naturally is what we are made of, combining energy and information, exi, in spacetime fields, ST¡, where we act to exi=st¡
Duality of actionsreactions
As we said we try to maximize our actions, which in praxis means to eat ad maximal, run the most, fuk every other day, and have fun with friends, not to speak of becoming overdrive of tvtrash information?! That shows you actions must be ordered and are regulated indeed by the limits of being just another virtual T.œ in pursuit of vital actions as everything else from the smaller particle to the whole galaxy in its hyper universe.
So in praxis actions are balanced, for the being to last and not burst out of exist¡ence for excessive action and imbalance. This means the very same actions we perform have ± dualities: actions cause external reactions of opposite sign, in the generalization of Newton’s second law and also in the internal balance of the organism, which for each positive outward action has a negative inward one.
The function of existence thus resumes in the number of actions a being performs with its energy and information which are basically:
±∆e: feeding (+) and moving () that spends the. energy obtained entropically in the action of feeding.
±∆ï: informing (+) and communicating (). So we hear and talk, we see and draw…
±∆exi: reproducing (+) and killing (), as we need the energy obtained entropically to reproduce ourselves.
±∑exi: Evolving socially (+) or dissolving≈dying ()…
Thus it turns out that the function of existence of beings, made of a sum of actions, which can logically be put sequentially (as ∑exi needs first, ∆exi, which needs first, ∆e and ∆i) creates a natural evolution of a being through simple logic equations of motions in time and space where:
> is an implosion of space into time, of energy into information, S>T and vice versa: T<S is an entropic flow of disorder.
Tƒ Exi≈ST_{∆U±4} : STopologies, Informative Time Cycles & Scalar Actions, the 3 ‘elements’ of existence.
All this said it is quite easy to understand the Function of Existence, in its simplest meaningful version, a ternary understanding of its components, forms in space, cycles in time and cyclical åctions in spacetime.
If we depart from a ‘fractal point’. The Worldcycle of that fractal world, ω≈∑∂æ,e,ï,œ,û, will be the sum of all its åctions of motion, ∂a, energy feeding, ∂e, informative perception, ∂I, offspring reproduction, ∂o, and universal creation, ∂u:
± E: ACCELERATE, ENERGY FEED
±ï: PERCEIVE AND COMMUNICATE INFORMATION
±∆… Œ: REPRŒDUCE;∫U: EVOLVE SOCIALLY
Diffeomorphic systems. The translation of form into motion. The isomorphism of åctions in the Universe.
Galileo’s Paradox makes the 3 dimensions of space also motions: At quantum scale ‘space’ is a bubbling world of electromagnetic energies and particles condensed from those energies. In our scale, space is a gas whose volume is proportional to its motion/temperature: PxV=knT. And as its motion grows volumespace grows.
Physicists, unaware of the paradox of Galileo still draw higher dimensions as weird spatial drawings, when beyond 3D, dimensions are time motions of a higher fractal scale. Yet they wrongly try to spatialize those time dimensions of higher fractal 5D scales, making them still and placing them in the same spacetime sheet, with impossible drawings of dimensions beyond the 3rd one of ‘volume’, which of course lack any functional purpose.
Yet Dimensions are functional motions perceived in stillness, which explains the generation of dimensions:
A point with motion creates first a height dimension to ‘gauge’ from an advantageous P.O.V.; then it moves forward in its diffeomorphic dimension of energy feeding, creating a plane; a line in motion creates a bidimensional plane of information; a plane in motion, reproduces laterally, creating a massvolume and a volume in motion creates a lifecycle or worldcone – the concept used in Relativity to define the 4th dimension of time. But we cannot generate more dimensions in this fashion, except as mathematical entelechies, at least in our observed Universe, since they are neither such forms nor further functions in a single continuous spacetime plane. Thus the 5th dimension of scales, with different time speeds structures superorganisms.
It is the holographic principle: 3D space has 2 dimensions of temporal information, height and width (so a book or a screen has those 2 dimensions that you ‘read’) and 2 dimensions of energy, length and width, as we absorb energy in the direction of motion, reproducing and storing cells in the ‘fat’ dimension of width that merges both, Sp X Tƒ dimensions of spacetime.
Thus both, energy ‘sheets’ and ‘informative antennae’ are bidimensional, perceived by human senses as a duality of motionstillness (Galileo’s Paradox). So the 1st dimension is length or speed; the 2D are a moving plane or sheet of information as this page is; the 3rd is a volume or rotating body, which moves through the 4th dimension, treated as space in Relativity (a world line). Finally, an organism in 5D seems ‘still’ but within it all cells and particles are performing complex cycles of energy and form.
Moreover we observe that as each more complex action includes the previous ones, each ‘bigger dimension’ includes the previous ones. So the line includes the point; the plane, the line; the volume the plane and the worldcone the plane. Thus we write in dynamic terms the Generator, as a feedback equation of fluxes of energy and information between 2 poles, ∑Sp∆1<=>∏ ∆, that create 5 Diffeomorphic, fractal, SpaceTime Dimensions.
5 diffeomorphic dimensions=åctions create a Generator Equation any being maximizes: Max. ∑Sp x ∏Tƒ.
It describes the 3±∆ åctions all systems perform: gauging information, Tƒ, feeding on energy, ∑Sp, reproducing both, x, and evolving socially as parts of bigger scales.
So 4 parameters suffice to describe all systems in terms of its åctions:
But mechanist science ignores the 3 topological ages of spacetime organisms and its social, scalar evolutions between its informative births and entropic deaths, because it fails to understand the organic whys its mathematical equations describe. As scientific equations are mere varieties of the Fractal Generator and its 4 functions. They represent the 4 vital åctions common to all species of spacetime. Thus in each of those scientific scales 4 functional equations express the energetic, informative, reproductive and social åctions that suffice to describe the existence of each species.
4 Vital Dimensions explain the existence of lightspace: the wide, energetic, magnetic field; the tall, informative, electric field; the reproductive, long wave speed, calculated as the product of its electric and magnetic field and its frequency colors, which are societies of photons.
4 Maxwell equations describe all the åctions of an electric field. 4 quantum numbers describe all the åctions of particles: the first number explains its energy level; the second number, its feeding & perceptive gauging; the 3^{rd} spin number shows its chances of reproducing new particles with a particle of opposite sexual spin; the 4^{th} magnetic number shows the social distribution of its atomic organism. 4 type of vibrations organize a social molecule. 4 nucleotide acids code the vital åctions of the cell. And 4 drives of existence feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially explain the game of life, which now mankind finally understands, just before she ends her existence.
So be humble, you are nothing, just a 10 dimensional being, an infinitesimal soul who looked at the infinite Universe, a variety of the 4 symbols of the fractal generator, who denied the meaning of existence confused itself with the whole, and now will die dust of spacetime.
Since only the Universe, and its soul, the fractal generator of infinite existences is eternal. @… monads are minds composed of a max. still form or linguistic singularity and a cyclical time membrane, connected through invaginations. It is the ‘invisible’ central command of the being, which perceives the Universe’s timespace cycles and stop its motion through a mirror image in the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’, which then reflect its back ordering reality as it converts its motions into ‘@ctions’…
So we study the form of the monad in space as a linguistic mirror.
The larger view. All the motions of social organisms.
In that regard, lineal time and physics and its single motionentropy arrow of time, is completely misleading with his astounding overgrown at the center of time analysis the understanding of time and space in all other sciences, which are far more concerned with the MOTIONS OF INFORMATION, THE TOPOLOGIES OF SPACE AND THE PROCESSES OF WHOLES AND PARTS.
Time is all, all is motion, present space being a slice of time, which physicists study with ∂t>0 instants. So it reduces timemotion to v=∂s/∂t. Now we ad information and the mixture of both, energetic, reproductive iterations and the scales of the ∆Universe… to obtain all the motions of the Universe.
And indeed, if humans could stop so much bull$hit and worship and belief (of physics or rather of the machines and weapons they reproduce), they would be soo obvious, as they are to me:
There are different motions of time, of which we shall consider 5, according to the existence of the 4 ∆@st elements, which again ONLY can give birth to ±4 motions in the inverse directions of ∆, @, S, and T, where the ‘2 Ðimotions of mind’ and its processes of perception, will merge the CLASSIC LIST OF 6 MOTIONS defined by Aristotle.
Indeed, again in this world of mechanisms and digital censorship, it seems nobody has read Aristotle on time and motion. He knew more in that sense of the nature of time motions that Mr. Einstein, and i say this knowing it is a blasphemy for most, because it is TRUTH. EINSTEIN KNEW ALL OF LOCOMOTION, 1/5TH of it. Not good enough.
Why 5 instead of 6? Because he did subdivide some, as in the fractal Universe ultimately every element can be subdivided as a fractal organism in itself (fractal principle of ‘pentalogic’. The question is rather, how Aristotle could understand them so well and yet didn’t use them further in its analysis of logic thought, shaping an hexalogic of the Universe?
Basically Aristotle rightly understood that perception is stillness, as all systems have ‘an unmoved central God (of which he saw ∞, famously exclaiming ‘we are all gods’), which moves as final cause all the energy around it (its bodywaves). So he did not consider perception a motion, but as the lack of it. But in a wider view, it is precisely the ‘change’ of motion from entropy through bodywaves to arrive to still ‘minds’, what we shall call here the arrow of pure information, or antimotion of the mind. And its inverse arrow: the communication of information, which so often puts in motion through its orders the beings around the hierarchical knotmind at the center of the system.
Thus the GST division of all the actions of existence as motions=changes in timespace was foreseen by Aristotle, who talked of 6 motions and considered perception of information, from a mindpoint of view, god and prime mover of the territorial energy it surrounds it. As such the so much despised Aristotle, turned out to be a more important philosopher of time than Mr. Einstein and Galileo who only studied one of the 5 time motions, locomotion (motion in space).
We can in this manner formalize all his motions translated to 5D as:
∆±¡: Growth and diminution: reproduction 3DST, and old age warping and entropy
– §ð<<$t: Decay(4Dentropy)
$t:2D Locomotion: ± displacement in Sdimensional coordinates & Reproduction: motion into an adjacent form of spacetime.
∆¡: 4D: Generation (evolution) and Dissolution: Motions in +∆¡
§ð: 1D: Perception and emission of information, inward motion of pixels that stop into a synchronous still mapping of reality.
It is worth to notice that:
0. Aristotle and those earlier philosophers, prior to the simplification of Galileo understood that all forms of change were motions, of which the main categories were motion of form, of in/form/ation studied by biological sciences and motion as translation in space, studied by physics, without significant change in the form, (hence easy to manipulate mathematically with derivatives, reason why it expand so much in the modern age). If we were to overblow lineal derivative time and locomotion at most we could say that lineal time is the SHORT TIME SPAN OF DERIVATIVE PRESENTS, AND INFORMATIVE, EVOLUTIONARY, BIOLOGICAL TIME IS THE LONG RANGE, FROM PAST TO FUTURE TO PAST OF WORLDCYCLES OF INFORMATION, WHICH REQUIRE ALL OTHER MOTIONS=CHANGES TO BE DEFINED SCIENTIFICALLY, FORMING together the ”series of a world cycle of timespace’:
T1: Generation (evolution): ∑St1=∆1: Growth and emergence: ±∆•T: PERCEPTION & communication> ∆St>Locomotion… and then the species will repeat once and again those last 4 motions, in cyclical modular form, feeding on energy and growing, perceiving and moving towards fields of energy, or towards fields of similar beings, with which it can communicate information; till the world cycle reaches its zenith and starts its decline with the negative arrows of ∆St, diminution, and – ∆+1<<∆1 final dissolution and death.
So this is the a priori fact of motions in spacetime. And from them we can extract some fundamental properties of the motion of the Universe.
1. All motions are combined motions in which several elements of ∆•ST intermarry. However for each of those dualities there is an element that dominates. In growth and diminution the scalar element, in locomotion and reproduction, the spatial element, in generation and death, the temporal evolutionary transformative element; and in mind’s motions, the informative element. We can in that sense further on reduce the 4 first motions, (growth, diminutions, locomotion and reproduction) to ∆spacelike equations and the other 4, to timeinformative equations.
2. All the motions are dual, ±, hence balancing each other to total a zero sum or worldcycle of conservative present in an immortal Universe made of eternal motion with form.So all motions can be considered elements of the Worldcycle of Existence and its different temporal phases.
3. Locomotion, the only motion studied by physics, and hence the queen of all motions, is just a reproductive motion; where little information is reproduced (waveparticle duality); while as we grow in scales of the 5th dimension and wholes require more information, the slow down of motion and growth of informative replication increases. So when we reproduce as humans the motion is minimal (9 months of informative reproduction inside the mother, and a small final motion to emerge in the adjacent region of spacetime).
4. Finally the study of those motions, considered here qualitatively is closely related to the different Constants of Action, which is the quantitative version of the same processes.
5. While its full formalization by the ¬Æ formalism of General Stiences is immediate thanks to the awesooome insights of one of my few idols of classic science, Mr. Galois the young r=evolutionary, who realized the key element of reality is the symmetry of all ‘transformations’ (motions with a change of information) of reality. We shall add, along the bidirectional arrows of each ∆•ST relative dimension of being.
So only those systems and groups that generate allowed symmetries and motions along ∆, @, S & T do exist – are solvable.
Group theory is thus a synoptic way to explain the Γ ‘Generator of Symmetries’, as the ∆st being in ‘reproductive flows, though the symmetries of its dimensions. As it divides those motions, roughly into:
‘SAbelian, spacelike motions’ (which are equal in both directions), the minority of them, mostly locomotions and reproductive motions that iterate a system and…
‘T Nonabelian, informative changes’ across T directions, (which are not changeable motions, as moving forwards in ccyclical time is the arrow of life and moving backwards the arrow of death).
While ∆motions are of two types:
∆±i: motions that ‘cross’ a discontinuity between full planes of existence; which are TIMElike. For example, motions through world cycles, or inverse motions of information and entropy.
§: social grouping within a plane, (10ˆ<10), which are spacelike motions as we can eliminate or ad members till the limits of creation of a new plane that emerges as a whole. Hence they are exchangeable §motions of social scales.
What of those 3 elements, dimensions, motions or actions matter most? Obviously actions, as they combine ALL the elements of reality, dimension, motion and scale. So we can say as Planck realized a century ago that the unit of reality is an action, but unlike Physicists who basically study only an action (the first, locomotion) we shall consider a more complex pentagonal Universe of 5 different active dimotions.
When we order those ‘dimotions’ in space we get a superorganism,when we order them in time we obtain a worldcycle of existence, when we order them in scales, we obtain the 5 actions of all systems that absorb energy from its lower ∆2 scale (humans absorb amino acids), information from its ∆3 scale (humans absorb light), motion from its ∆3 scale (humans absorb gravitation) or simplex actions, while developing two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution from its higher, ∆1 seminal scale, ∆o scale and ∆+1 social scale.
Actions are thus the FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE of the limits of perception of any ∆ø and relate directly ‘perception’ and ‘stientific’ knowledge to the relative position of the mind that perceives. They are also the essential element to fully grasp WHY we perceive only a limit number of scales of reality with us at the center: namely because we ‘HAVE THOSE ∆±¡ practical limits in our actions’ – NOT because there are NO more scales above or below.
It is also important to realize that actions are either predatory (those involving smaller beings), equalitarian (reproduction with an ∆ø equal form) or submissive to the ∆+1 social world. We are, as Shakespeare put it, buffoons citizens or kings depending of our perspective.
So in this post we shall introduce briefly the model from the home page and then talk a bit of each of the 5 D³imotions (dimension, motions and action) of reality, which in the future will be the main method of study of beings, to understand its structure in space (dimensions of the superorganism) its worldcycle in time (ordered as sequential motions by the symmetry S=T) and combined use for the program of survival – the program of its 5 actions.
IN THE GRAPH, we see the five dimensions of reality, 3 of present organic ensembles of beings, two in scales of lower smaller parts and larger wholes. They are symmetric to the 3±1 ages of a world cycle between its 1D generation as a seed that evolves socially into a whole and its 5D entropic death:
THE ORDER OF THE 5 DIMOTIONS IN ALL SYSTEMS: FROM PERCEPTION TO LOVE.
An essential theme that is often ‘hidden’ by the multiplicity of jargons of all disciplines, is the ‘guidance’ of the survival program and the priority between the 5 Dimotions, which explain a ginormous number of phenomena and ‘changes’ on the steps and actions of a beings, which goes as follows:
All systems perceive at the bottom of the pyramid, hence perception contrary to belief is the less desired of all dimotions – no motion at all.
Then the system will move through locomotion towards a field of energy in which to feed, by perpendicularity. So motion is the second hierarchical action, and feeding on perpendicular energy the third.
This leaves the complex reproductive, ‘mirror symmetry’ and social love as the most desired, yet more difficult to achieve goals of existence, in the proper Maslow pyramid:
And this applies to the choices that a given object will make in its ‘modular’ change of actions.
For example, the perpendicular repulsion that two electrons suffer ‘afraid’ of cancelling its waveforms (Pauli exclusion principle) breaks in Cooper Pairs of superfluidity, when their inverse spins entangle into a ‘couple’ by chiral mirror symmetry. It is essentially the arrow of reproduction, as two entangled spins with enough energy can reproduce bosons and even other fermion. Yet this might be broken by the ‘penetration of a magnetic field, which will put into a social conjunction all the electrons.
Thus what a mechanical view of the Universe deems absolute (the repulsion between electrons) is broken first by the complementary mirror symmetry of Cooper pairs, and then further on by the social coevolution under a magnetic field.
Yet the choice between couple pairing and social network often is contradictory, so women prefer the coupling through mirror symmetry, but sterile men prefer the social gathering of larger numbers. So happen in the previous example in which the cooper pairing produces a superficial constant current that expels the magnetic field (Meissner effect). Its mathematical description being the how of the deeper how of its hierarchy range between Ðimotions of existence.
Thus the two social reproductive arrows however are often exclusive and so we find sexual reproduction and clone reproduction, mirror symmetry in dissimilar forms and social evolution in identical forms with minimal asymmetry (notably spheres and points, which become indistinguishable elements of a network or Plural ‘nuclei’ of a wave).
It is then necessary to make use of the laws of existential algebra that define all the relationships between Ðimotions of spacetime, even if they might seem abstract, as they are the realization of the hierarchies between Ðimotions born of the survival program of the Universe, which we repeat is NOT absolute mechanical as many physicists pretend but must be put on the context of each local symmetry.
The simplest generator equation.
Let us consider then with the simplest possible symbols of NonÆ Logic (the advanced formalism needed to describe the more complex space and time), a logic equation of the ternary spacetime topological forms=functions of all ‘organisms’ of the Universe:
≥: iterative, reproductive, hyperbolic networks that become body waves, as the hyperbola has all the shapes within it to reproduce the whole being.
 ≈: Flat planes of lineal parallel networks of ‘fractal points’ that become limbs/fields of maximal entropic motions as the line/plane is the fastest distance between two points.
O: Informative, implosive ‘neuronal networks that become cyclical spherical particlesheads that process information as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space.
So the simultaneous ensemble of ‘networks of cellular/atomic/organic herds’ into those 3 differentiated functions=forms which therefore extends across to ∆ø and ∆1 scales, within the ∆+1 world in which the ternary network/system exists is what we call a super organism.
So we write with those symbols fa Generator Equation of T.œs.
$t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) ≤iterative bodywave≥ §ð (still mind form or world)
The ginormous quantity of consequences, detailed and laws derived from that simple formula being made of those 3 topologies would fill up when study in its details – all the beings and super organisms of reality and its ternary parts – an entire galactic encyclopedia.
So in this very brief introduction we shall consider onlythe most remarkable consequence in the simplest level of understanding of it – the ternary principles of conservation of physics that correspond to the 3 parts of all systems.
Each of those vital topologies would require an entire post and encyclopedia to fully analyze the marriage of mathematics and organic existence.
Let us now consider the most important of them, the cyclic/spheric form. Its vital function is to process information, memorial form. And so it is cyclic, spherical for two reasons: A sphere has maximal volume in minimal space, ensuring the ‘still, informative’ system to process maximal information and disguise with minimal exposure. But most important memorial information is cyclical because TO RETURN TO A POINT, THE SHORTEST PATH IS A CYCLE.
So cycles impose their form in all kind of Universal structures which ‘conserve’, ‘memorize’ and reproduce the information of its external world and the information of its internal existence (as in the conserved cycles of energy).
The full formalism of a Theory of the Organic Everything or whole and its Time§pace Œrganisms (T.œ), its fractal parts, should be made departing from a description of its 5 Ðimotions in simultaneous space that describes the system as a super organism, in 3 fractal ∆±¡ planes, in a static, ‘structural spacelike form’ through ¬Æ: Existential algebra and in a ‘timelike dynamic flow as it is generated by a singularity mindseed of information which will grow, evolve into 3 networks, emerge as a whole, trace its worldcycles between birth and extinction in the external world through actions of exchange of energy and information, aging till a point in which all its energy will be exhausted and it will collapse, in an entropic explosion of death.
We call the analysis of its 5 Dimotions in abstract as adjacent topologies of a super organism or in vital terms as ‘actions’; the Rashomon effect, since we study as in the famous film 5 different points of view or elements through which the being expresses itself. And we call the study of its world cycle through the entire lifedeath existence of the being the Disomorphic method as we study the defining elements of the whole process of life, from its palingenetic generation of a seed that will become a ‘mind’ of a territory of external world and internal ternary physiological control of its ‘brother cells/atoms/citizens’, to fully create a super organism that will live and die again through those 5 Dimotions.
Those 2 approaches together, the spacelike and the timelike define the super organism and its worldcycle in a far more complex and rich manner than the previous 4D formalism of Mr. Einstein did with its single analysis of only one time arrow, the worldline or locomotion; which from this far richer and meaningful analysis of Times seems rather a childish exercise compared to our full blown complex extraction of all the information about a being and its worldcycle of existence.
The 5 Dimotions
Let us then start considering how the 5 Dimotions of timespace, locomotion; its inverse, information, its combination, hyperbolic iterative, reproductive waves, and its lower disordered planes of death, entropy (max. scattering, disordering motion) an organic upper, entangled wholes (5ht dimension of social evolution of discontinuous parts into wholes) define the entangled organic Universe, and why HUMANS do NOT perceive it as such due both to a historic limited evolution of the discipline, and the embedded egocy of man, who gauges information from its point of view, hence deforming its perspective, thinking of himself, the center of it all.
The ilogic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.
That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…
The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.
So they said the Universe is dying and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPYscattering motionsdeath aka weapons.
But there are 3 more ARROWS of time, modes of change, which are THE POSITIVE, CREATIVE, INFORMATIVE, SOCIAL, LOVING ARROWS not the 2 simple, destructive negative, arrows of motion and entropy which they DO study: 3) information 4) reproduction 5)social love, the highest of them.
THE UNIVERSE REINFORCES THE PROGRAM OF THE 5 ARROWS OF TIME with SENSATIONS the ultimate program and as it prefers information to motion, we prefer to love (ARROW of eusocial evolution) to orgasm (arrow of reproduction) to perceive (arrow of information) than to run (arrow of motion) and to kill (arrow of energy feeding).
The super organism, as an entangled system…
in which the 5 elements of the being scales, time, space, minds, and all together as an entropic ∆@st are in constant creative transformation.
The ¡logic of the 5Ð³isomorphic fractal Universe is kaleidoscopic, pentagonal, which given the fact that each nonE pointmonad is merely @ristotelian, with a single A>B logic, it makes rather difficult to explain it. So we shall try, and to that effect we shall use an ¡logic concept, the ‘Rashomon effect’.
What all this means is that the 5 elements of reality, Space, Time, scales, minds and the entropic destruction of them all, ARE NOT isolated elements but all of them are entangled, perceiving each other in kaleidoscopic forms.
The metric of the 5 Ðimotions of time§paces has properties that are entangled albeit expressed in different manners by the different languages that perceive them. The 5 Dimotions differ topologically, as both its geometry in motion (topology in space) and logic causality in time is different. For example a Darwinian event implies the cutting through perpendicular geometries tearing the variety of our topological organs, predated; an act of communication requires on the other hand a parallel motion to allow communication at equal distances of the subtle, ∆3 pixels an ∆º mind uses to that aim.
When we study the actions of survival across scales, their functions and perspective also differs from the sadistic ministrations we make to the oysters we ‘love’ to torture with lemon to the view the oyster terrified will have in its inner point of view of the monster that eats her alive; and finally in the last layer of reality, perception itself of sensations that reinforce the program of actions, it is a different sensation of exhilarating pleasure an entropy action, that the acute pain of informative knowledge of truth, or the pressurepain associated to the social evolution into choking herds that inflict order upon us.
All those layers of reality are related to the four elements of the being, its space, its time, its scale and its mind, which provide simultaneous, topological; sequentiallogic; sensorial, perceptive and organic biological ± preypredator scalar elements to all functions of existence.
However as we are representing here the 5 ðimotions of existence in terms of logic thought and structures, which will be of great usefulness to discuss logic questions of algebra and existential thought, certainly the view of this article will deal in Ilogic terms with our new symbology.
Lets us then briefly define them in the sequential order in which a cycle of exist¡ence happens as we perceive information to move accelerating towards a field of feeding energy, which will be used to reproduce organically an offspring of similar forms and evolve socially to unite into a universal whole…
And each of those actions will be related to all others, in the entangled Universe provoking:
5 emotions. So when we talk of information and perception, it is of 5varieties related to each of the 5 elements of reality, which we define with 5 emotions, each for one sensorial perception of the other 4 elements: Reproductive pleasure, acute perception, eusocial love, destructive hate, exhilarating motion… all those perceptions and its subtle variations are ultimately the ways in which the Informative Ðimotion sees the other ones.
The element which seems more difficult to introduce within the entangled multiproperty Universe is under the ego paradox of restricting emotions to human existence, that final level of sensations, which in the new terminology that tries to show the entangled relationship of all elements are to be called emotions.
Initially I wanted to use emoticons for them and generally I would consider it, if they were available for this keyboard. Then we could talk of 5 emotions, parallel to the 5 Ðimotions, parallel to the 5 logic suits, parallel to the 5 aeiou actions and 5 topological dimensions and 5 time motions and 5 organic functions… of exist¡ence. They are though only available in hotmail. So they would be, as taken from hotmail’s list, providing 2 and explaining them:
😇,, O>: : for the fifth emotion of social love. They both have the ˆ, of ascension to the fifth dimension.
😈, (<: For the fourth emotion of entropy. Obviously the exhilaration of entropy, which however destroy us needs a devil emoticon.
😳, O: For the 1st emotion of stopping information. Information stops for perception, opens your eyes, it is though not happy, often painful. S
😍, Ø=: For the 3rd emotion of reproduction. Love symbols or converging ones >< as those are the ¡logic symbols for happy reproduction.
😎, : For the second emotion of locomotion, the most stupid of all Ðimotions, mechanical and mindless – so the higher function of thought – the eyes, are somehow lost.
It follows for those who don’t have the nice yellow emoticons, we can use the hand ones.
5 locomotions. From the lack of it, in the informative stop, to the steady locomotion, to the decelerating motion of entropic dissolution, to the SHM, back and forth motions of reproductive actions, to the accelerated inwards motions of social evolution into a TIGHTER higher whole.
As all is connected and all is entangled the variations of events and forms born of the 5 elements or rather 3 ±¡ (given the clear oppositions between entropic actions and social evolutionary ones; between locomotions and information; whereas only reproduction in present seems to bring the 5 dimotions together) at a logical level the best way to express reality is through those oppositions:
4 vs. 5: Decelerating Entropic, 4th dimotions vs. Accelerating Social, evolutionary 5th Ðimotions. We can consider such oppositions to be the most extreme of reality hence we use the concept of antisymmetry for them, symbolized by the ‘warrior’ symbol of ♠ for entropy and the ♥ symbol for social evolution.
1 vs. 2: Stop, informative perception vs. Lineal locomotion. We consider such relationships to be alternate as in the processes of stop and go, perception and motion that are common to locomotion when fully understood as a combination of ‘form and motion’ (wave length and frequency). So the level of opposition is not so extreme and it is NOT a single event so often destroying its ‘repetitive nature’, and as such we can consider them disymmetric and use the suit of diamonds♦, to represent it.
3: Reproduction, which includes in its complex form the other 4 Ðimotions. And so we need a combined mixture of all those processes.
The concepts of entropic deceleration, social acceleration, static position for information, steady motion for locomotion, and its full combination for reproduction would be in physical terms, the most proper way to describe the 5 Ðimotions, as states of motion in themselves.
5 Iterations. As inflationary languages reproduce infinite views of the same Universe, locomotions happen as adjacent reproduction of the being which repeats its information as it moves, reproduction proper implies a motion in the 5th dimension from seed to whole, and entropic reproduction is the mirage of expansion in space of the being which however looses its inner connections till it explodes, and finally social evolution requires first a clone reproduction to form with those equal parts a whole.
5 Entropic extinctions; of the pixels we absorb and ‘stop’ to perceive them as ‘corpses’ of a mapping; of the ‘fuel’ we need to move; of the ¡2 elements we break down to reproduce our variety of forms, and viceversa, as death is a dual destruction down to scales of the fifth dimension ¡º<<¡2; while social evolution of the whole destroys the freedom of its parts…
5 Social evolutions. Finally a mapping of information is the social evolution of the pixel stopped in the mind, a locomotion is a series of adjacent reproductive memorial tails of the being fading fast away in lineal fashion, a reproduction requires a palingenetic clone evolution of parts into wholes back and forth from the ∆1 plane, while entropy is the inverse of social evolution, and twice the social evolution of a beings is its emergence as a super organism, a humind that becomes a prophet cloned in the mind of believers to emerge as a social whole, a star that evolves into a black hole mind of the galaxy and so on…
A better way to cast the connection between the 5th Ðimotion and reality though is to establish 5 clear forms of social organization, combination of the previous 4 elements with the element of social evolution: a language, which is the social representation of the whole by the 1st Ðimotion of the mind; a herd, which has its main purpose as a wave of the 2nd Ðimotion of locomotion; an ecosystem in which the 4th Ðimotion of entropic darwinian processes take place, an organism, whichis the evolution of the 3rd reproductive Ðimotion and a super organism, which is an organism of organisms, the 5th natural form that ‘tops’ all the possible states and processes of existence, coming therefore the conclusion that with the concept of a supœrganism all other concepts Ðimotions and its combinations can be cast.
The entanglement of all those layers of reality is so profound it cannot be cast on the usual systems of thought of the humind, so we are becoming creative with the language: 5 emotions correspond to the pentagonal logic of sensations of the mind; and are the basis of a psychological stience. 5 locomotions correspond to the 2nd Ðimotion studied by physics. 5 iterations correspond to the 3rd Ðimotion of reproduction; 5 extinctions to the modes of entropy, and 5 evolutions to the 5 forms of social organization.
We can then create a ¬Æ topological stience of the ‘variations’ of composite dimotions similar to the topological stience of varieties of complex manifolds, which is of great use and we shall apply extensively in the 3rd and fourth line to the understanding of the different variations of species – which in fact is a process of combinations of ternary simplex topologies in different hierarchical orders.
Of the 5 Ðimotions the less accepted by the egocy paradox is the most important – the will of the mind and its program of existence carried by its 5 emotions, likely associated closed to the sensation of the 5 locomotions with the mind uses to perceive existence.
We shall deal with those processes though in this post with a composite approach that will put in relationship the behavior produced by those emotions and the geometry and outcome of relationships, both destructive and constructive according to topology.
So indeed the Universe is a pentagonal kaleidoscopic fractal selfrepetitive interactive entangled ilogic existential form of a higher logic than that of man.
All this allow us to study in simultaneous entangled view any system as a pentagonal islanduniverse.
So all systems of the Universe ARE vital, each one perceiving reality with a different language that mirrors it; topological images in physical systems from bosons to crystals; verbal words in human beings; 4 genetic letters in cells; 4 quantum numbers in particles. Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.
In the graphs, we observe the obvious: physical systems do obey the same laws that biological ones because their ultimate elements, particles follow the 5 dimotions=vital actions of all systems in ‘exi=stience’ and this happens because a system that doesn’t gauge information for his particle/head, moving entropically over a disordered ‘larger’ plane, as it displaces towers a field of energy for its iterative body wave; using the extra energy to reproduce its form into a clone system does NOT survive.
So regardless of nature all systems must ‘automatically’ perform those 4 arrows of timespace to exist (the number of synonymous words, dimotions, vital actions, timespace arrows, dimensional forms, we use are many but all mean the same – a combination of motion and form with a vital function that ensures the program of survival of the being).
So there are NOT 5 quantum numbers/genetic code but only 4. Because the same quantum number that codes motion just increases it to create entropy and disorder the system (Principal number that ‘jumps’ in size as the particle ‘feeds’ on a force and disorders it). The oxygen that moves the cell also as a free radical destroys it, cars going fast kill you in accident, etc.
DEATH is the needed error of the Universe NOT desired by the program.
For that reason it lasts only a ‘single quanta of time’ (whereas a quanta of time IS for any ∆±¡ super organism, the ‘tic’ of a ‘cell/atom/individual’ of its lower, ∆¡ scale, for biological, physical or social organisms).
So you die in a second, your relative timeclock quanta the time of 1 thought=glimpse in your head, 1 beat of your bodyheart, 1 step of your limbs… And the rest of your existence is lifelasting…
Same with the conundrum of antiparticles (entropy=death arrow of particles): they die in an instant, so we see far less antiparticles because the product of its numbers in space x duration in time is so short, while particles live almost for ever. Same reason you don’t see corpses around. Death is the shortest possible arrow.
This is LEIBNIZ: ‘THE UNIVERSE is the most perfect of all worlds possible’.
Each entity is therefore a Timespace organism of 5 Dimotions and ALL try to achieve as the goal of the sentient organic Universe the ‘highest dimotion’ of social evolution. So particles come together into atoms that come together into molecules that come together into planetary and life organisms that come together into galaxies that come together into the organic networks of the Universe.
ALL THIS SAID, there is a huge other field of analysis of timespace, called Evolution, founded by Darwin which deals with the changes in the information of beings. Why?
Because indeed, besides the previously analyzed dimotions of locomotion, origin of relativity, and entropy, latter considered in more detail as the synonymous of death and dissolution, (which physicists also merely describe mathematically and confuse with the motion of gases, so we shall work that theme on the sections of physical laws), there are 3 more ARROWS of time, modes of change, which are THE POSITIVE, CREATIVE, INFORMATIVE, SOCIAL, LOVING ARROWS not the 2 simple, destructive negative, arrows of motion and entropy which they DO study: 3) information 4) reproduction 5)social love, the highest of them.
The 5 Dimotions of timespace as actions of existence.
Existential algebra studies the STeps of each Ðimotion of spacetime, which originate the feed back equation: S≤≥T of steps of space time, that move reality from the STEntropy of the Past into the ƒð<<e and through death back into the original steps.
How we move in spacetime means how we exist as both things are equated. Steps of motion are always transformations from spatial elements to temporal events back and forth, and so steps that are possible in principle are simply 3:
S> T, T< S , S.=S and T = T. THOSE ARE THE first dimotions and with those four elements we can start to describe across the feed back equation,
S≤≥T
all the Steps of all the dimotions of exist¡ence.
The ilogic of the Universe is pentagonal, meaning times have always 5 ‘paths of future’ a system can choose. Time is MOTION=CHANGE, what physicists study is a single time ‘arrow’ of future, locomotion, since Galileo defined ‘speed’ v=s/t with time. So in that so simple view of ‘brief time’ motion is absolutely deterministic. That is the pride of physicists. To think they can determine the motion of beings. And they do. But that is ONLY one motion=change of reality. One path. Call it speed or lineal inertia, say it is deterministic or a ‘conserved quantity’.
That would be though a boring Universe. From that ‘reduced’ Universe physicists have come to truly think they know it all – hence their belief they are soo intelligent that transpires in the attitude of so many of them…
The second arrow they discovered latter on, in the XIX century of the 5 TYPE OF MOTIONS was ENTROPY. Entropy is very closely related to lineal inertial motion, but it is let us put it this way the absolute maximal motion in space aptly symbolized with S. Entropy is so much about motion that it becomes explosive, Big Bang, scattering motion. Now the ‘form’ of the being is not even conserved, it is explosive motion that breaks the internal ‘form, information’ of the being. So it is the MOTION OF DEATH. All your parts explode away and your information dies.
So they said the Universe is dying and they kept on KILLING IT as what they do IS MANUFACTURE MACHINES THAT MOVE IN LINEAL PATHS (TRANSPORTS) OR worse, machines that PRODUCE ENTROPYscattering motionsdeath aka weapons.
YET THE opposite is truth: the universe constantly strifes to increase its social evolution and emerge in the 4th Dimension of social love.
In that single plane the being, which acquired its maximal perfection as form of information in its seedgeneticmemeticpropheticquantum particle state (biologic, sociologic, physical systems) will now try to evolve further into its ∆+1 social world. But there mostly will play a shorter game of existence (in a relative slower time speed) called life that ends in the fourth dimension, entropic death, as hardly any form of reality is able to keep ascending the scales of the fifth dimension.
So basically huminds fearing the fifth dimension (or loving it in the case of physicists whose worldly profession is to make entropic weapons, and hence have created multiple entropyonly theories of reality), consider only the 3 ages≈spatial dimensions of topological beings but without the proper analysis of its S=t symmetries do not fully grasp its two fundamental structures a super organism in simultaneous space made of lineal limbs/potentials < Øreproductive bodywaves>Oparticles heads, and its 3 ages of life, as the order in simultaneous space of those 3 systems is different from its wordlcycle order; as the reproductive bodywave is ‘between the lineal limbfields (1D) and its ‘coiling into a cyclical motion (2D particlehead).
It is then selfevident that the order of those 3 present dimensions, lineal motion, cyclical motion and wavelike motion is multiple giving birth to many different events and formal organisms. And from this realisation comes the big question about the 5D entropy and inverse 1,4D generational and social dimotions: can we invert their order?
So most systems have its maximal form in the seed o1 temporal state. Even if ALL minds WOULD LIKE THE order to be the opposite and grow always in information without death and entropy, which IS NOT what we observe in the real world.
∆º: Worldcycles.
THE main order in time is the world cycle, which unfortunately starts in the lower scale of faster time speed, which becomes ordered till emerging in the upper scale, but then is all going down, into the 4th dimension of death… So the arrow of entropy reigns in each of the scales alone, but the arrow of information BETWEEN SCALES IN THE 05 CYCLE, alpha and omega of all those existences.
Its study is the fundamental form of knowledge possible in the Universe. But we say all time motions have a spatial symmetric form. What is the symmetric form in space of the world cycle of time? The super organism, the fundamental simultaneous form of reality. Below we show that symmetry for a human being.
Travels through the fifth dimension.
For a dimension of spacetime to exist, an entity must be able to travel through it, while its spacetime parameters remains coinvariant.
In words of Klein, one of the discoverers of NonE Geometry:
‘A Geometry is the study of the (co)invariant properties of a space(time), under motions within itself’ (Klein).
Since it is precisely the coinvariance of both parameters what allows ‘species’ to travel through those scales and exchange energy and information through them without the system and the dimensions to ‘become unstable’.
So how we travel through the 5th dimension? Simply moving through it in the lifedeath cycle of existence:
Let us then define with those simple principles of existential beings its most important equation… the…
5≈3±1 ages of ðime§paœs
‘To be or not to be, that is the question’ Shakespeare, on the function of ðime§pace existence.
“For you are ∆ºst (of ðime§pace). And to ∇ûst you shall return.” Genesis, on the world cycle of ðime§pace existence.
‘ΓºΔ is the seer of ðime’ Saint Augustine; on the program of ðime§pace existence.
‘ðime§pace Energy is conserved in all zerosum ωorldcycles between birth and extinction in which a ðime§pace being transforms back and forth its entropy into information: Eω≈∫exi=st‘. Principle of Conservation of the 3 arrows of ðime§pace. Function of exi=st¡ence.
Sancho on the ωorldcycle of all ∆ºST beings
We can now switch analysis from the spatial, synchronous view of ðime§pace cycles/arrows as organic parts of systems, into the temporal, sequential order, as ðimeages of a world cycle of existence.
It must be noticed that humans tend to confuse (and so the error translates in many pages of our blogs, from an earlier age in which I tried to explain a simplified model of the world cycle):
Spatial Entropy (ab. $pe), pure disordered motion that expands §pace and dissolves form, and energy, when that motion starts to acquire form – so the equation of energy is a vector with a clear define direction in its motion, given by the form that moves.
Pure cyclical ðimelike form (third image) with information, which is forminaction, the intermediate state in which form acquires some motion to be transferred.
So, the worldcycle’s equation is as follows:
∆1: birth as a seed of pure form in a lower scale>which emerges in the new scales in a youth of entropic motions, which soon starts to learn how to ‘form’ entropy into energy growth > maturity when energy becomes shaped into information and the system reproduces > old age when information dominates till the system becomes still> entropy age or age of death, when the system returns to the ∆1 scale.
In the next graph, the Universe is a fractal of 3 topological motions of ðime§pace; Entropy, information and its combined momentums, which integrate into a closed, zero sum energetic worldcycle. Thus the study of the world cycles of ðime§pace and its 3 motions encodes the meaning of all ‘exi=st¡ences’ acronym for the fundamental equation or ‘generator of fractal ðime§pace, e x i = st, which each ‘stience’, studies by studying the ðime§pace beings of a certain scale of size of the fractal Universe:
So we talk in space of the super organism as the fundamental particle of the 5D Universe and in time of the world cycle of life and death as its fundamental event – whereas the worldlines of 4D models restricted to a single plane of spacetime are the limit of the 5D formalism for a single spacetime continuum; which fail to describe those organic properties happening in 3 coexisting scales, since all forms of reality are born as a seed of information, emerging a larger super organisms in a larger world, to finally after 3 ages of growing information, collapsing back into a 3rd age of warping, which exhausts the energy of the system, provoking a time reversal into entropic bigbang local deaths:
Amazing as it seems the Universe as only 3 topological varieties, which therefore correspond to the previous 3 forms. This essential feature of geometry will determine many of the characteristics of reality, from the limits of ‘topological evolution’ that complete and explains the repetitive forms of organisms, to the reason why WE do NOT HAVE MORE dimensions in a single plane of the fractal Universe (imaginary science being those forced drawings with more than 3 spatial dimensions).
In the graph, using the minimum symbols of ∆@S≈T, < for a flow of entropy, > for a flow of information, ST for a present momentum, ∆, for the different scales of existence of the Universe, we map out its fundamental world cycles. The understanding of those world cycles, event in ðime, of a synchronous networks of clone beings or super organism in §pace, is the fundamental task of GST, the organic model of the fractal Universe.
The interesting fact of those worldcycles is that they are again the product of a sequential order of the 5 Dimensions, IN THIS CASE IN INVERSE FASHION, a fact we shall study with its deep philosophical implications in more detail.
∆generation (4D:SOCIAL Evolution FROM SEED to emergent form of present>lineal youth (1D)>reproductive maturity (2D)>informative 3rd age (3D)>entropic death back to the past (5D).
THOSE ARE THE 5 MOTIONSdimensionsarrows of timespace, now forming the lifedeath cycle of existence of all beings. Thus, without them and all its possible symmetric relationships, that allow us to extract all its meanings together we cannot make sense of any system,including physical systems, today observed mostly with a single one, ENTROPIC locomotions and its worldlines.
In that regard all physical and biological systems, ‘live and die’ as super organisms made of ∑atoms/cells that evolve through networks that transform Entropy into information (Life arrow) and then explode those information networks back into disconnected Entropy when they have exhausted it (death arrow) determines a sequential, existential lifedeath cycle invariant in all beings:
– ∆1>∆º: 01 Dimension: Generation: Birth as a seed of information that evolves through a phetus that feeds on energy, reproduces and finally emerges, realizing a first full trip through scales of the fifth dimension between its cellular/atomic/prophet and organic/crystal/cultural ‘whole’ emerging state.
Max. Motion x Min.Information: 2D youth of external, LINEAL motions with maximal activity of its SpLimbs/potential fields.
3D: Sp=ðƒ: Balanced, ‘classic’ age dominated by reproductive/communicative systems: hyperbolical waves and bodies.
The presentpresent, or steady state in the continuum is the longest, more efficient state and can be defined mathematically simply as Max. $p x ðƒ > S=T, since both equations are related, as 4×4>5×2>6×1, the point of balance between Entropy and information is thus the maximal point of the equation of existence, the mature, re=productive age when the species reproduces its Entropy and information fully in other zone of §pace and ðime.
It is the desirable age to ‘stay for ever’ the immortal top predator point of the wave of existence of any species or individual or universal, Consider the classic definition of beauty in art, as a balance of forms, and indeed, we see the harmony and proportionality between form and size, the key dimensions of lineal and cyclical space, is the definition of classic beauty. And we will return to that, when observing that all forms of art can be reduced to 3, lineal, epic, energetic art, classic art, and baroque, informative, with an excess of form.
3rd informative age/1ST Dimension. As time passes and the present evolves into the future information dominates, energy exhausts itself, motion stiffens and the being looses its ‘time mobility’, becoming formal, wrinkled, warped, till all motion seems to cease, but as motion NEVER ceases only in the virtual mind… it changes finally direction and abandons the present to dissolve in the relative past (a choice of our informative mind we by convention choose here as the future).
It will be the 4th Dimension, the age of entropy.
Now, in the larger analysis the ages of existence are obviously more as we have to count its two limits, the seminal age, ∆1>∆º and the death and dissolution, its inverse ∆º>∆1.
So we consider 5 AGES, common to all beings of Nature, in the 5th isomorphism common to all ‘exi=st¡ences’
Further on there is ‘§ixth’ unique age, very rare for those unique lives that REPEAT the process of creation of larger new scale of reality, i.e. prophets of social memes and religions, species who evolve into supœrganisms instead of being extinct; which ultimately explains why the Universe does have ∞ new scales of social organization.
As certain ‘perfect players of the game’, achieve not the ∆º<<∆1 entropic death but a new ‘life’ in the ∆+1 scale, as the singularity mindmirror of information, the particlepoint ’emerges as the seed of the ∆+1 social scale’ instead of dying (prophetic thought, which creates a civilisation; black hole formation as the mindventer of a galactic, ∆+1 scale for stars, etc.)
So, while we shall escape the miraculous emergence of a being after death into a higher social scale, in the third line, for the sake of comprehension we study 5 aging states: seed>youth>maturity>old age< extinction, to fully close a worldcycle.
Of those existential cycles, physicists consider that entropy objectively is the future as they see the organism of the Universe expanding, perhaps in a process of death as it was likely born of a seed of pure information that exploded into a reproductive radiation of ‘gala cells’ galaxies…
In the graph matter’s death by entropy: e=mcc happen in all scales. An interesting argument is to consider in which scale happens the bigbang, a local entropic background radiation measured locally for the galaxy, likely remnant of a quasar state. So ∆st favours after carefully studying data, that each galaxyatom or gala cell – perspectives comparing it with other scales of similar spacetime; has its bigbang cycle and the size of the wholeness of those galacells is not known, as we explain in our articles on cosmos and galaxies… so the hyperbolic ego of man has also reduced the size of the Universe and properly written its theory to look like he knows it all…
In any case whatever scale is the dark entropy underlying the galaxy at cosmic level, physical organisms and its 3 arrows of:
Entropy ≤c²(St)≥M(t) which form a physical system and can be broken in death, follow also the ternary ages of life.
So the creation of matter from plasma emerging s a whole also precedes its death in a birth of matter, which evolved socially the material system, and will at some time reproduce similar cycles of formation of matter. So while there is no end to the game of replications, the ego dies, and on top despite seeing timeinformation as the future, the mind is somehow orientated in inverse form to the entropy decadence and expansion of the body from youth to old age.
PART II.
THE 5 DIMOTIONS.
The basic symbology of ilogic dimotions.
We shall study this ‘organic, vital reformulation’ of the Universe based in a simple ‘first principle’: we are all super organisms in space tracing worldcycles in time, which we shall elaborate in the first line.
So the 5 Dimotions (ab. of dimension in space and motion in time) that create the form and function of all systems and its parts, between its generation by a mindseed and extinction in entropic explosions are (symbols have varied through years so some might be wrong in some posts, and the 4th and 5th dimensions of social evolution and entropy transmuted)
 First Ðimotion: NonEuclidean pointssingularities: seeds and minds, but also particles/heads: formal, linguistic perception: ∫T as they integrate motion (T) into form.
 Second Ðimotion: limbs/potentials: Lineal momentum: $t. Symbols are quite clear, $ for lineal space and t, the symbol of lineal time.
 Third Ðimotion: Reproduction: S=T: ∑e x ∏I: Body waves iterate energy & information: ∑∏. For easiness I tend to write SiTe, as it is the most important, or S=T, the balance of reproduction that happens to maximize a product, SxT: 4×6>2×8. More correct though are ∑e for energy is superposed as a summitry in herds, while an informative neuronal system is multiplied through its axons into a knot of higher density of communication (∏i);
 Fourth Ðimotion: @Mind Worlds: §ð Social, organic evolution: as § seems to transcend into an upper world, and represented 2 s for social scales, while ð is a cyclical time form, being the circle or polygon the essential mathematical form or a social ‘ring’.
 Fifth Ðimotion: Entropic Universe: Death: S∂. The symbols here are pretty obvious, S is the symbol of entropy and ∂ the derivative that gets a ‘finitesimal 1/n’ part of the whole which entropy dissolves.
The main confusion of symbols being between 1 and 4, related Dimotions for which I use very often for both, §ð, specially for 3rd age perception, which is the age in which both coincide (the age of information but also in classic systems, the age of elders that run societies). Though as I keep writing try to correct 1D to ∫T.
Some basic rules:
Since dimotions evolve in time they acquire form. So we move from ‘lineal $pace’ (line crossing not money), and the symbol of lineal time in physics, t into…
the ‘curved symbol of time’ ð, and the ‘complex view’ of space, as ‘extending through 3 planes’ selfcentered into the opoint, §…
With the intermediate phase of reproductive in bodywaves organized around the duality bodyhead, waveparticle, whose main difference is this: body waves are blind herds of minimal connection, hence sums, ∑energy (which also resembles a wave put upwards) while neuronal, informative particleheads are networks that exist across 2 scales the whole and its axons (hence the ∏ multiplicative symbol for a ‘crossed’ network, since if we have 5 and 5 elements, the number of axons to join them will be 5 x 5).
FINALLY for the two scalar dimension of entropy and generational organic evolution, the symbols which look like S and T are running out (:
S and T in capitals though have not been used and stress the capital importance of those dimensions which include all others as present sheets in a single plane of the fifth dimension. So those are actually the FULL meanings. Since Entropy is symbolized in physics by S, the choice is not rocket science. As the main operation to extract a part from a whole is a derivative, a ‘moment in time’ tangential to the function we study, ∂S is therefore a clear representation of Entropy (it does in fact happen mathematically very often as we shall study in mathematical physics and nonAElgebra).
So we are left with T, the capital Time of all times, for the most important dimension of them all the fifth dimension of social evolution, love, mind wholeness, organic generation, you name it. And aptly enough we still have an s left!, ∫, the symbol of integration, which is what truly social evolution is: the integration of similar clones into networks that become single wholes with an inner time synchronized externally by the mind (ok, im here letting my stream of consciousness flow, so we shall stop).
It follows some simplex symbols that define a logic equation of life and death with 3 phases:
$t: young age when motion dominates.
∑=∏: an age of balance and reproduction of the being, into waves of clone ‘cells’ that become reorganized by physiological networks emerging as a larger whole.
§ð: 3rd age of excess of information…
§ð<<∑∆1: $t when death reverses the whole process as explode back a whole into its parts…
And as we observe death is fast and short and it exists only because it is necessary, as the positive arrows of information, reproduction and social evolution through a language of information increases so much the form of beings that finally there is no motion left, no energy to reform… So to replenish the simplest motions for reality to keep moving, death must come but fast…
Further on, when we apply those organic structures also to social and physical systems, whose organic properties have been denied in the case of physics or reduced to the individual human scale in the case of social super organisms of history, WE CAN describe THEM all in terms of an homologic ‘worldcycle of existence’ in the graphs, explained in great detail.
The previous ‘equation’ thus uses the symbols of ‘Ilogic’ topology and causal time chains of information (>) and entropy (<), intuitive in its expansive and implosive forms, is thus an expression of the generator in ‘time terms’, as the ‘flow of spacetime cycles of the fractal Universe’ (∆ð±¡) becomes ‘formed’ after feeding head and body into meaningful forms and motions of the 3 supeorganic parts of the plane of existence of the system (∆ø= xO). Yet as information constantly increases in the ‘minute’ actions of the being, accumulating errors of reproduction, the system warps and gets older and the mindlanguageheadsystem (§@) STILLS reality.
For example, humans keep ‘growing in the fifth dimension of space’ in territorial property as they get old till finally all its motionless – the old man, his money in the account, his territories of orders, homes and properties but there is NO vitality on it. The maximal ‘reach in space’ is achieved the minimal motion in time and at that point the system dies ‘fast’ << in entropic explosion that returns the timespace being, to the lower ‘plane of the fifth dimension, ∆ð¡1.
The world cycle is an impressive element to study, as we travel through the fifth dimension precisely as we grow in size, by clone reproduction and selforganization of similar ∆1 faster units (atoms, cells, citizens), which slow down the whole as first they have to evolve inner networks of simultaneous organization and synchronous motions which consume time. Then the being once it is perfectly synchronized internally but with a SLOWER timeclock for all those synchronous systems OUTWARDLY, emerges as a whole, and keeps ‘increasing its territorial size’ that will ‘slow down its vital rhythms’ till ending and old stultified property ‘thingy’.
We can see in the first graph, how all physical, biological and social systems, follow the same ‘worldcycle’ of existence as a travel through 3 ∆±1 scales of the fifth dimension, as they are born in a seminal seed that emerges into an ∆º scale, where it will move decreasing its motion and increasing its information through a gaseous, young state of minimal information, through a reproductive, liquid state of balance into a 3rd age of maximal information, exploding back its form into motion, in the entropic process of death.
∆ð±¡≈≥>S@< informative third age age exploded black to its ∆1 beings and as memories in its larger world place.
All the organic systems of the Universe, physical, biological and historic, follow the same 5 Dimensional states of a worldcycle, from its fast evolving relative 5th dimension or generation age of social evolution from an ∆1 seed to an emerging ∆º individual through the 3 dimensional ages of life, to the 4th dimension of entropic death..
What physicists do with its simplified models of 4 Dimensions, is to reject the arrow of social evolution, love and organic information, which is the 5th dimension of creating wholes by parts, because of its ‘concept of time’ merely as change of motion, locomotion, lineal motion, which then for the whole Universe becomes the arrow of ‘entropy and death’, and we shall adscribe by the correspondence principle to the fourth dimension.
The ultimate whys of 5D metric… are thus in fact, as we anticipated, organic. Indeed, the reduction of speed of motion and cyclical events in larger beings happen because they must first establish a simultaneous, present, coexistence of its clone reproduced parts, necessary to act externally as a whole. So the ‘whole’ clock of the system must slow down as it enlarges into multiple organic clonelike beings which will then adopt the ‘slower collective clock’ as its new ‘unit’ of simultaneous action as a whole.
1 Ð: GENERATION:
SEEDS=FORM & MINDS=LANGUAGES
The first Dimotion of existence, contrary to common belief, is not translation in space, whose dominance in human ‘sciences’ is due to the extraordinary development of physics of locomotion, itself a byproduct of the mechanical culture of machines and weapons, we live in…
Indeed, to move one has first to perceive the direction of motion. Perception of information moreover can be achieved in the stillness of being a mere particlepoint – in fact it requires stillness to perceive ‘form’ with no blurring motion.
In that sense we distinguish two fundamental forms of being in the first dimotion, as a mind that perceives an external world in the stillness of a language, mirror of the Universe. And as a seed of memorial information that will then generate an entire super organism, by unfolding according to the sequential order of those dimotions in time, a world cycle of existence, which we study in great depth in the first line.
We use to symbolize the first dimotion a simple Ilogic symbolism: ∆ð≥ §@; that is all the flows of time cycles of the Universe ‘implode’ (>) and yet magically keep a resemblance ≈ as they do so into a linguistic mindmapping, when it is an external world what ‘collapses’ or a seed of information, when it is the internal world what it collapses. Then in both cases, an inverse motion of time space will expand the ‘collapsed image and its selforder’ back into reality, creating a territory of mental order or a clone super organism.
The closeness between seed and mind is in that sense one of the most fascinating fields of study of the Ilogic of the pentagonal time space organism.
THE COMPLEX DIMOTIONS OF INFORMATION.
Let us then do a fast review of those 5 Dimotions we shall study with increasing detail as they entangle to create reality, till they become SIMULTANEOUS SUPERORGANISMS TRACING SEQUENTIAL WORLDCYCLES.
How to study the Universe of 5 Ðimotions of time and space is simple:
When the Universe orders those dimotions in time sequences you get a world cycle, when it orders those dimotions in simultaneous space you obtain a superorganism; and for the reason the first sentence of this blog, is written as a line that describes precisely that duality:
First though, we should make a specific consideration on the ‘nature’ of the humind, and why it sees 3 perpendicular dimensions of height, length and width (which then it combines into those 3 bidimensional topologies of spherical heads/particles, flat, long planes of potentials/limbs and hyperbolic body/waves). THE ANSWER IS THAT WE SEE LIGHT SPACETIME as our background reality because we perceive with electronic, light eyes. So when we observe our ‘real external spacetime’ which is made of light, those 3 perpendicular dimensions correspond to the ‘functions’ of the light ‘spacetime organism’: cspeed moves ahead the wavestate of the light beam; the electric informative field is on the height dimension, the magnetic, energetic field is wide.
And finally the ‘dimension of social evolution’ is made of colors. What this ‘fifth dimension’ means we shall soon reveal.
In the graph the Euclidean world is caused by the 3 perpendicular arrows of light spacetime to which we add the social colors. 2 more elements are needed to define our human spacetime, first the organic relationships between our electronic eyes that feed on light, and the properties of information – as information is perceived in stillness, in an stop and go motion, similar to that of a film – so electrons go and move as waves, stop and feed and perceive light as particles, entangling its distances with other electrons in ‘fixed’ distances. Hence cspeed is always constant, our rod of space, as relativity proves, without giving the proper ilogic explanation.
THUS both in the external light world, height, length and width have the same functions than the internal, ‘volume’ created by the 3 topological varieties of the Universe: spherical, planar and hyperbolic forms.
So obvious is the fact that our spacetime is light spacetime, with its specific Euclidean ternary dimensions in which we are immersed, that it amazes me that only philosophers like Kant (our mindspace is euclidean because light is Euclidean) Leonardo and impressionist painters (who paint light space with sfumato or decomposition of colors) had it clear. Once we advance more the mathematical and physical models we shall incorporate into Relativity and quantum physics this feature of reality that explains some of its paradoxes (clight speed, quantum potentials, etc.)
@:SPATIAL INFORMATIVE MINDS
Formal, topological definition of timepoints: minds, and spacefields.
‘Each point holds a world in itself’ Leibniz
As we shall repeat once and again, the true colossus of science have been his philosophers NOT his physicists, though Planck and Einstein, once philosophy of science waned, have value in its statements. Aristotle, Descartes & Leibniz thus form the triad of intuitive geniuses GST will when fully developed consider its western pioneers. Let us then translate their ‘monadintutions’ in a formal topological definition:
“A mind singularity is a point of time displaced in its latitude of synchronous clocks speeds that occupies a single quanta of space, a field is a extension of simultaneous space enclosed in a single quanta of time.”
We concluded earlier that pure time, the absolute arrow is that of the fifth dimension, relative time is the world cycle as it ends always in a zero moment, lineal time duration is a distortion of cyclical time, made continuous by pegging cycles of time one after another.
How can then we define properly relational time and space in formal terms? In the previous sentence we resume the concept, which takes the inversion of informative time and entropic space to its natural limits.
They will be the formal limits of the being – its linguistic mind that stores all the information of the system in a single pointquanta of space (atom, cell, citizen); and can be better understood closer to humans in our social systems: a point of time or mind in a nation is the king, president of the nation, a single quanta of its space population; which is connected through the physiological networks of information of the system (the laws) to all the quanta of space who obey, and become synchronised by it.
The quanta of the galaxy is the black hole, a single central volume similar to that of a star, connected by gravitational forces to all its stars; and your ego, likely will be a single neuron of maximal communication with all its other neurons, themselves connected to all other cells; in the super organism of history we call a religion, it is the prophet whose memetic DNA connects it to all other believers in time. A POINT OF TIME, thus is a mind and it will be structured through causal time in its connection to other beings through synchronicity.
On the other hand, a extension of space exists simultaneously in a quanta of time, and so its extension will paradoxically depend of the underlying speed of its upper or lower (relative concept) scale that ‘entangles it’ through simultaneous networks of communication, sychornizing its motions. Those are laws of quantum physics, illunderstood, which can be extended to all other systems of the Universe. This introduction just gives glimpses to the whole sheer magnificent structure of the ∆±i ST universe.
Now the key to the work of those systems is the different speed of information carried by different frequency of time cycles in each scales, what allows the synchronous behaviour of all of them, guided by the fastest more complex ‘knot of timeinformative cycles – which is the mindmirror.
So we shall now consider the key element of reality a mind that synchronises in time all the systems and cycles of an organism and creates a ‘world in itself’ enclosed by a cyclical membrane – able to act on the Universe and ensure the survival of the system. This is the origin of the mind as the 5th dimension of the whole, which makes possible existence of beings:
The mind has a fundamental role: to embody the perception of the whole super organism and as such is rightly considered the 5th dimension of the being.
Theory of Measure: 01 probability sphere vs. 1∞ Cartesian plane.
IN THAT REGARD in mathematical terms the difference between a Mind and a seed can be established in terms of the equivalence (measure theory) between the o1 probabilistic sphere, which will be the equivalent to the palingentic seed and the selfcentered cartesian frame, which will be the view of the mind ordering an open external territory. In terms of the Galilean dualities, the seed is a ‘closed’ domain and the mind an open one entangled with the territory it orders:
01th dimension (o1 unit cicle in probabilistic temporal terms as expressed in the linguistic mirror of mathematics): the generative cycle which brings finitesimal parts into an integral and defines also the Unit of NonEuclidean mathematics, a fractal point that grows in information as we come closer to it, allowing infinite parallels to cross.
Now this 01th dimension will be the main theme of the blog, because it is the less understood – we didn’t even consider it in classic ‘science’ (as opposed to ‘stience’, science of spacetime beings’) before.
We have use for it the yellow color in the previous graph… so you can see the flow of colours, though more properly should be a blue… the birth of colours in the highest, shortest frequency, and then go down to end in red.
The 01th dimension is closely related though to the fifth dimension of ‘growth in planes of existence’ of the Universe. And when we study the formalism of NonEuclidean mathematics we shall see that the first notion/postulate of Euclid, DEFINITION of a point with nobreath and its 5th postulate (points and parallels) are essentially the same concept that must be reformed.
So the 1ST postulate shows in function and motion the evolution of finitesimals, ∑∆1 into wholes, ∆o ‘first units’ of the new social evolution in the 1∞ plane, as an ∆beings which will evolve socially in an external ∆+1 world.
5th dimension: the world, and by extension the whole range of scales.
ONCE THE O1TH emerges, and further develops its 3D ensemble of lineal moving limbs/fields, Oparticles/heads and Øhyperbolic body waves, the 123 ensemble will exist in an outer 5D world, part of an infinite Universe.
The 5th dimension is the sum of all the infinite scales of the Universe, which going upwards will be called the 5th dimension of social evolution (biological view), integral, polynomial growth (Mathematical, physical view), which convert each new o1 temporal unit circle of a finitesimal in a first 1 of a new 1∞ scale till creating a new super organism.
The real order of absolute time, being natural to the fact that for a larger whole to appear the 01 ∆1 finitesimal one, must exist first.
Hence the 01th dimension of generation before birth; of a pure seed of information is the beginning of all games of existence.
And we can observe this 01TH point in terms of information either as a seed or as a linguistic mind born to order an external territory.
In quantum physics it allows the unification of two scales, so long seek, as the o1 probabilistic sphere will be the quantum ‘seed’ of the 1∞ thermodynamic wscale treated with statistical populations; theme we shall some day explored in full mathematical gear in the 4th line.
Singularities as ‘doors’ to new 5D scales/dimensions.
I always have a riot with philosophers of science coming from the amateurish field of 4D physics – the likes of my ‘acquaintances’ Mr. Penrose and Mr. Hawking, with whom I have been involved not always in the best of terms, due to my activism against the Black Hole Factory – when they come around with their ideas that black holes are ‘doors to the past’, and ‘new dimensions’.
As all in reality is a biased mind perspective in fact all has a bit of truth. It is impossible to go the past and kill your father, because time is local.
All clocks of time are local and only act within the membrane of angular momentum which is the time proper and its inner ‘vortex’ with slow time motions, dominated by the two elements of the T.œ, which are synchronized – the membrane and the particlehead in the center.
Both are synchronized in time to this angular momentum outer clock to dominate the slower vital energy in the center. So now we can related the 3±i fundamental ‘parameters of reality to form and function and the 3 conserved substances; since:
Time clocks are the angular momentum membranes conserved in the Universe.
Space is the vital surface enclosed by those membranes, which in itself is an open entropic, expansive surface that only under the constrains of the limiting membrane acquires order, form (and can be parametrized mathematically as any student of calculus knows: to find solutions to equations it is always required a ‘constrain and limiting parameter’).
Scale finally has its origin in the very definition of a mind and its equation as a singularity: Omind x ∞ time cycles (universe) = Constant linguistic still mirror mapping… Indeed, we could IMAGINE A NONSENTIENT UNIVERSE WITH NO SINGULARITIES, WHICH WILL EXIST IN A SINGLE PLANE OF SPACETIME CONTINUUM, AS THEN it is not needed to ad on the monad’s inner infinitesimal view of the whole, which reduces its volume by eliminating motion and dimensions of perception to fit a ‘crystal mirror’ image within it. And so by the correspondence principle because 4D physicists do deny singularities, it is indeed not required a 5Dimension to ‘navigate’ the locomotions of a single physical world, but even if the 4D nonsingularity models of physicists do work, it will NEVER find the whys of existence which are provided precisely by the singularity that also ‘creates’ the inner fractal worlds of the mind.
And so the coda is as mystical, beautiful and intense as it comes: the mind IS the site of EVERY smaller scale, and so the Black hole has a mindmirror in 5 Dimensions (maldacena’s conjeture) of the 4D larger galaxy brain. Your mind has a homunculus smaller mirror of the whole organism you observe, and the crystal of the visual reflected Universe above.
THE MYSTICAL CODA is immediate. As we are small, we MUST be part of a mind that ‘imagined’ us… What is that mind, we shall discuss when studying the evolution of Mother Earth as we are the mind of the Earth in its outer membrane.
And viceversa, as the mindmirror reverts the motion of information back to the territory it orders, we can consider that we are all born in an infinitesimal mind. Thus mind and membrane, form together the membrain, the intelligence of the Universe that orders the slower more extensive inner vital ‘temporal energy’ (preferred name for the inner region of the clock) of the ternary system. Minds, Seeds, creation, information, God as the maximal information point or singularity of the system, and many other terms are now entangled into ‘Dasein’…
The Œpoints: monads that order the Sentient Universe.
This first example of the complexity of the Universe, which many scientists, mostly physicists, have shunned off, obscuring a deeper knowledge of reality, hopefully prepares you to persevere in the understanding of the complex ambivalence of the Universe, simplified by the human mind, whose equation in the metric of the 5th dimension – one of the infinite varieties of Tƒ x Sp = ∆mind – we can now explain:
O@ (infinitesimal Œpoint or mind) x ∞ð (Universe perceived) = Œ (constant mapping of reality)
What a mind does is rather simple. The Universe out there has infinite time cycles that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cyclical motions. This is an ∞, which we cannot store inside us.
So we simplify all those motions into ‘forms’ perceived as extensions of space, Sp.
On the other hand the mind is a Tƒ, spherical system, with 2 different spheres: an external membrane with sensorial detectors, which ‘shrinks’ into a relative smaller point, the eye and then the brain, which transforms Sp, the infinite cycles made into spatial forms, and keeps shrinking them to an infinitesimal mapping of reality, a still image, very much as the way a camera reduces reality to a virtual shallow image in 2 dimensions.
And this can be done because of a property of spherical forms, called the Poincare Conjecture: you can shrink a topological sphere (any closed membrane, a skin, a planetary surface, is a sphere), as much as you want without deforming its information. So we find infinite minds in the Universe, ‘monads’ in Leibniz’s terms, which as he said ‘are points, which store a world in it selves’.
So we could also define the Universe as an infinity of ‘world’, fractal minds perceiving reality from those Œ points. What all those fractal minds do? Time cycles? Why. Because they keep perceiving and gauging information through them, and they keep absorbing ‘energy’ to move, and they keep reproducing their time cycles in parallel forms of spacetime, and they keep evolving with other points into larger systems of points, topological networks, which have organic nature.
The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘Dimotions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they actreact accordingly.
We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’. Simple, because the mindsingularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its egocentered perspective.
In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACETIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.
Now, this theoretical minimum, which gives birth to the biggest r=evolution of maths since Riemann, ‘does away with Hilbert’; but to fully put the copenhagen interpretation to rest and complete the understanding of mathematics in experimental terms, we need as we have done with spatial geometry and topology, show how temporal algebra and its numbers, do also reflect reality, in an evolutionary process called the closure of numbers that again will follow the ternary, universal syntax of ‘REALITY’.
The particle point features heavily in Nuclear physics and it is still a ‘mess’. I like of all of them, the Delta Function, which is ∞ at 0, 0 on the infinite line and 1 in its integral. It is perhaps the best mathematical definition and for that reason, Dirac without understanding what it means – the emergence of a pointparticle as a 1element of a higher ∆+1 scale, made it the nonrigurous foundation of its beautiful quantum thoughts.
In the graph, as our mind is electronic, we feed on light energy and transform it into an informative mapping of the Universe, reduced to what light sees. Thus our space is light spacetime, with its 3 Euclidean coordinates, a fact that was first understood NOT by physicists but by impressionist artists, Leonardo, whose motto ‘saper vedere’, guided my inquire as a young artist on reality behind the languages that describe it, and then by the impressionists; and finally by Picasso, who departed from reality, affirming he painted thoughts, so he studied the ‘elements’ of the mind mapping, its entropic lines (cubist age) and its cyclical forms (female portraits).
This theoretical minimum however when fully evolved will give birth to the biggest r=evolution of maths since Riemann. As it ‘does away with Hilbert’. But to fully put Hilbert and its adon in physics, the Copenhagen interpretation to rest and complete the understanding of mathematics in experimental terms, we need to evolve further spatial geometry, topology, temporal algebra and its numbers, to reflect reality, more accurate; which we shall treat in the posts dedicated to maths in the second line, from its evolutionary process called the closure of numbers that again will follow the ternary, universal syntax of ‘REALITY’, to the study of the analytic geometry of its ternary elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic minds…
WHY THE FRACTAL POINTS IS ONEDIMENSIONAL: A 0 X ∞
A FRACTAL POINT is considered to have ‘one dimension’, meaning it has volume and in the ∆+1 plane where we measure, it has a role as a moving point in a cycle of its larger ∆+1 world, so it appears to us, either as a point with volume or a moving point (which has less density as it is transforming information into a reproductive movie wave – ultimate reason of some paradoxes of relativity of motion).
ULTIMATELY from an outer far away scale is a odimension, from an inner perspective is infinite. So we settle for a product as 1, the whole, and barrier in mathematics between the unit sphere and the Euclidean plane.
So we define different ‘dimensions for the elements of fractal nonEuclidean geometry’:
 Fractal points have a minimal 1 dimension, when perceived (by definition if not perceived they don’t have a dimension). This only string theory in physics understands, giving to each point a lineal inner dimension. It is a good approach for formal work but we want to be more precise. So we shall define the nonE five postulates of noneuclidean geometry first, and consider that each point when seen in detail is a whole super organism of 10 dimensions, but as a whole membrain in the upper scale it appears to us, and works as an active entity in motion, as a one dimensional point with motion and an internal form we do not perceive.
So the point will either be a static point with an inner dimension that connects it to the lower ∆1 scales (akin to the concept of string geometry), or a ‘pointparticle’, that moves tracing a cycle in a larger ∆+1 world, and we shall see it as a line in motion also with a dimension.
2.Lines are waves with 2 dimensions, as light or any other form able to communicate information.
3.Planes are topological networks, which require three lines to define it and so they have 3×2=6 space and time dimensions (3st dimensions).
Planes are thus the spatial view of a superorganism with 3 entropic, informative and iterativeenergetic networks; which in turn can be observed as a larger whole, unitpoint of the new ‘scaling’ which starts afresh – hence the need for a fifth postulate which is akin to the first (definition of a point) but from the internal point of view (as a point with volume), showing how vital geometry is also cyclical, and refers to the geometric process of growth of scales between ‘two ∆±1 planes’.
It is then essential to consider the less understood and more important of the axioms of Euclid, the definition of similarity between two fractal points or planes which determine its behaviour as only those forms who understand each other’s gauging language can herd and collaborate together in parallel, otherwise different forms with different languages will use each other in darwinian events of perpendicular hunting.
So this darwinian vs. loving duality IS ESSENTIAL TO THE INVERTED BEHAVIOR OF THE FOURTH AND FIFTH DIMENSIONS OF ENTROPY AND SOCIAL EVOLUTION, and it is ruled by the ilogic laws of congruence=similarity of the 3rd NONE POSTULATE, the most important and less understood of geometry, concerning the nature of parallelism and perpendicularity.
This also introduces the answer to questions of the type – where it is the fifth dimension, how the dimensional scales of the Universe grow?
Answer in a cyclical manner as membranesenclosures of a previous open ball; so layer upon layer of a spherical 1dimensional form, the inner parts grow; and/or as a reproductive wave, the pointparticle moves and creates in a new scale, a new game of social growth.
EGOIST MINDS: ¬Æ POINTS
The 0mind dimension of still, pure linguistic information can be seen as a positive form that generates order but also as a still selfish p.o.v. that distorts and limits the freedom of herds of moving cycles of existence.
LINGUISTIC MINDS:
‘Cogito ergo sum’ Descartes. ‘E pur se muove, e pur no muove’ Paradox of Galileo
Minds are knots of time cycles, which ‘wondrously’ achieve synchronic passages of those cycles through its knot of perception, Γ•, a singularity • connected to a fractal generator of a supœerganism, Γœ. A mind is thus the brain that knots with its actions a simultaneous region of time cycles called a supœrganism, which travels through the fifth dimension in a world cycle of existience, that is, of exchange of entry, energy and information (exi), in a larger field of space time, st, defined by a specific st¡ence, of ∆¡=x.
This in simpler jargon means all around you you will find ‘constant knots of time cycles’ that manage in a true equilibrium of existence to float between two planes, ∆±i, as a living, ∆º, Γ•, being, alas, in virtue of something we might call, language, perception, awareness, intelligence, or simply tripping, because that is what minds do, tripping exist¡ential dreams called ‘life cycles’.
The killing, ego centered monad vs. The communicative, creative mirror.
Existential logic thus precludes that a mind which is selfishly ignoring the needs of its ternary parts, concentrating only in being a membrain, selfcentred in the singularity warps, sucks in, sinks and dies, by excess of information, obsession with the ‘pressures’ of the external world and lack of balance within it.
In the third age though the mind no longer keeps the balance of reproduction and enters in the third vortex age of increasing involution, as it is connected to its time function more than to the space function of existence. In this third age the monad is in the highest state of information, and its ego ∆º world has become a curved black hole, its personality diminished to the understanding of not being anything but a warping, dirty bag of time cycles:
We could call the Mind, M³=MonadMirrorMind, a term first use by Pythagoras, the first scientist, then elaborated by Leibniz, the greatest of his disciples, which now come the full circle around in this blog that upgrades the perennial philosophy of complex stience, adding all the necessary details and corrections of structure to make sense of it all.
In the graph, the amazing insights of Pythagoreans, who draw the mindsingularity as the common unifying principle of all systems, closed by an external cyclical membrane, which stored the vital ‘energetic §pace’ of the being. This ternary structure is thus as Leibniz and Descartes rightly understood the fundamental particle of the Universe.We compare it with its inverse topological vision, as it is precisely the two parts, singularity and membrane which formed the monad of pythagoras, the two parts that in an open ball of energy, present existence do not really exist as part of the open ball (remember mathematics is an experimental science).
But Leibniz, rigorous with his mathematical analysis DID not give his monads communicative properties to simplify their analysis, making them all ‘black holes of perception’, NOT as they are mirrors who selfcreate and then project the self into the environment, and further on points that become connected with similar points through those flows of communication into building topological networks and supœrganisms. And as a result sooner or latter systems become organic systems across ternary scales, which the monad communicate.
So reproduction, and selforganization is the ultimate cause of the process of existence of supœrganisms.
But why they go through world cycles? Why we die? For the same reason mirrormonads create reality; because of the singularity or mind of maximal information that both will create as a seed of form from ∆1 the whole being in the beginning of the cycle, but will annihilate it at the end of the cycle, when exhausting its entropic motions and combined energy, by the mere fact of being its maximal will that of perception, without which the game does not start.
Thus minds stop entropic motion into form, combining them in the middle as a series of actions of energy, which are in derivative view standing 0 points but in its ultimate infinitesimal view always ‘scar’ a bit too much of information that they devolve back as entropy and so they are the reason systems evolve, age and finally die after a given number of frequency steps in the path of pure ‘stiff’ form, constantly growing by the influence of the mind’s sink.
So the development of the three ages of life, max. s≈youth, max. t=3rd informative age, and max. st=present balance of energy and information is ultimately the ‘existential vibration’ of the being in his specific wordcycle ashe ‘scales up and down’, through its ∆±1 panes of existence.
Death becomes then natural to all selfish, Stiƒminds, which transforms entropic §pace into a flow of TEMPORAL information in the stillness of the mind, which converts temporal flows into a synchronous super organism, made of actions=moments of existence.
This is the ultimate conceptual duality – that between the magic harmonious creation of infinitesimal minds of §pacetime: ∆•st.
And the Universe they reflect and will return to in the entropic explosion of death: ∆ûst vs. Temporal, mindless motion with its automaton deterministic cyclical order.
So it is now time to switch perspective from the objective description of reality as we have done through the external point of view of the three arrows of time and the scales of the fifth dimension, to the inner point of view of languages of the mind that distort the Universe as physicists do, to cater to the subjective ego of those minds, casting them with a formal equation that explains why at the end, people like Bohr, the proponent of the uniqueness of ‘his discipline’, not Bohm (the proponent of the whole unity of it all, and the realist, quantum interpretation of reality), carried the day.
SIMPLY put it, because while the Universe is objective, just, eternal and perfect, all those infinitesimal •minds embedded on it, are subjective, egocentered, fleeting imperfect parts of the whole, made ‘to its image and likeness’, with some ‘errors’ of design…
So it only rests to see that languages, both verbal, visual and mathematical derive also form the 5 Dimensions of spacetime and then we shall have proved that languages ARE just mirrors NOT the original source of reality.
Indeed, a mirror always ‘reduces’ reality to less dimensions in the image, so do languages, and so if we can show you that languages are more reduced than spacetime, and can be defined as mirrors of spacetime, it is obvious that spacetime is the source of all realities, INCLUDING languages.
Languages are mirror of the 3 motions of spacetime, entropy, energy and information.
A more humble realisation comes from the understanding that ‘the languages of God’ are infinite (upanishads) as all singularity minds map the Universe into its infinitesimal still focus, reflecting in the linguistic mirror the infinite cycles of spacetime that conform reality. So before the language there was the space and time, that carried the entropy and information of reality mixed in energy actions whose properties the ternary syntax of all languages reflect. So the 3 main languages of man are ternary syntactic mirrors of the 3 components of reality:
Subject (information) < verb (action of spacetime) > Object (entropy of subject).
Y (time function)< operandiaction> X (space function)
Blue (informative color) < green (reproductive colour) > red (entropy colour)
Heigth (informative dimension) < width (reproductive dimension) > length (motionentropy dimension)
And so on…
But humans have had as egocentered minds a real hard time understanding languages only as mirrors of spacetime; thinking instead that languages – specifically the languages humans better understand wor(l)ds and numbers create reality. So we have first to put at face value that egocentered humind paradox.
2DIMENSIONS
LOCOMOTION OF FORM COMMUNICATIVE BIDIMENSIONAL WAVES
‘Of the 12 Kantian categories, Schopenhauer rejects 11 as redundant, and retains only causality. He then discusses the a priori nature of ðime, §pace and its causality (ab.∆), the 3 innate functions of all minds” (ab.@)
Introduction to Schopenhauer “On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason’ (∆causality, @Mind, §pace & ðime)
“Call information entropy. Nobody knows what entropy really is, so you have the advantage.”
Neumann to Shannon on $.
DUALITY: HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE
The first and most important element of the Universe are its dimensions, described mathematically but whose conceptual meaning so far escapes science. We shall thus define first its two fundamental 0) logic=temporal elements 1) geometric=spatial and:
0) The duality of perception of dimensions, either as motion or as distance form (Galilean paradox), which we ust have explained
1) The bidimensional nature of all parts of the Universe (holographic principle); the next instalment in the architectonical building of reality departing from time cycles.
1.Holographic principle. Bidimensional ðime (information with motion) and entropy (§pace with motion)
‘Simplicity is genius’ ; ‘Saper vedere’. Leonardo on the topology of life and its harmonious forms
‘Coincidentia opositorum’ Cusa, on the fundamental dialectic dualist logic of the Universe, which constantly brings the opposite properties of ‘Lineal entropy’ and ‘closed information’ into Complementary Spaceðime energy beings.
In topological terms, there is lesser ambiguity:
Time clocks are always cyclical and related to information stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, as the circle or the sphere in three dimensions are the forms which store more form with less surface. On the other hand §pace is lineal, with less dimensional forms of information, and more extension in §pace, as the line is the shortest distance between two points a an b. A circle thus made of a simple rotating radius is a clock and traces a external membrane, which can be seen still as a whole or a point moving. It thus have a dimension more than its ‘spatial state’, moving between A and B. We shall call the ‘function of a point or line as a circle’, an informative function, and the function of a line as a pure motion in §pace an entropic function. In the graph, left, the simplest form in existence in the Universe, we can ‘perceive’ is a form with motion (all what you see is indeed forms with motions); a line limb/field of entropy, moving a head/particle of information.
And two logic immediate properties of the nature of those two elements combined or disjoined are:


 The inverse properties of spatial entropy and temporal information, its fundamental logic property. In graph, the inverse function between Spatial, entropic expansion and Temporal, informative Implosion has infinite manifestations and can be defined by a simple equation of inverted ‘hyperbolic’ nature: ð=1/S. As we defined cyclical ðime the inverse of Lineal Time , ƒ=1/t, it follows that physicists ‘Lineal Time ‘ is indeed lineal §pace with motion, hence the discovery latter on that Lineal Time is a dimension of §pace (Einstein).
 The fact that one can be transformed into the other, which is essential for the dynamic nature of the Universe. So we define a first simple ‘Generator equation’ of ðime§pace beings:

Γst. $pe (entropic §pace) < ≈ > ðiƒ (Temporal information)
If we ad the topological form (Lineal Space: $) an cyclical time: ð, as alternate synoptic symbols for spatial entropy and cyclical information.
And call the combinative state ðime§pace momentum, whose ‘integral’ (in physics, extended soon to all systems) is called Energy, the ‘third element’ of reality: Spentropy > StEnergy < Tinformation
Whereas the intuitive symbols of ‘expansion’ < and ‘implosion’ > indicate that TO TRANSFORM one into the other, through an intermediate ‘momentumenergy state’, entropy must shrink into information, Spe>Tiƒ or information must expand into entropy, Tiƒ<Spe.
We can now ad to this ternary ‘topological’ discovery, the ‘duality’ of motions vs. distancesforms, to fully define ðime, form, §pace, entropy, energy and information.
THE CREATION OF DIMENSIONS
How dimensions are created? The scalar dimensions, as we have shown by social evolution in ternary and decametric scales.
Then there is the erasing of the fifth dimension by the fourth dimension of entropic death which is inverse.
But in a relative present of motion x Oinformation = øbody waves, there is also transformations of one dimension of lineal form into one cyclical form, or one formal dimension of space into the equivalent dimension of time.
Creation & Destruction of Masses as Vortices of Physical Information. How Dimensional Form Becomes Speed.
For example, a mind‘Aristotelian God’ which doing his ‘thing’ can stop the energy moving around in a disk of accelerated vortextime speed, expanding a motion into stillness, now stored in a ternary volume of space, or viceversa, quench a height dimension of form into an accelerated bidimensional disk:
A dimension of angular timemomentum coming out of a loss of a dimension of volumespace.
Above we show how dimensions of distance can become dimensions of motions. So the contraction of a 3rd entropic volume becomes a bidimensional accelerated space vortex and vice versa.
The Universe creates dimensional form by reducing the motion/speed of a physical system and vice versa: it creates motion/ speed by eliminating dimensions of form. So a 3 dimensional nebulae of matter collapses into an accelerated mass vortex, in which, according to the Equivalence between gravitational forces, masses and cyclical acceleration (Einstein’s relativity), is an attractive whirl of spacetime.
The equivalence principle establishes a Universe with two limits of eternal movement: a lineal speed of gravitational and electromagnetic forces and a cyclical speed of masses and charges, which are vortices of spacetime. Energetic forces create space, and vortices are clocks of time that carry information, eternally transforming into each other in selfsimilar events:
Σ spatial forces (lineal movements) ≤=≥Tƒ (cyclical clocks of information).
The sums of all those events maintain an eternal dynamic balance of cycles and lines.
Yet since lines have one dimension less than a clock cycle, the process can be also perceived as a game of creation and destruction of dimensions of form. In the graph, a threedimensional slow nebulae accelerates its motion as it becomes a bidimensional vortex of faster, more attractive mass. Such transformation is common both in the cosmological world as stars become black holes and the quantum world in big crunches when electrons become quarks. r.
The Galilean Paradox is essential to understand the Universe as fixed lines are also ‘—motions’ and bits of information are time clocks. And one can transform into the other: Se x =Tƒ. They do so through the 3 ages of life or energy’s standing points of a Hamiltonian:
Spe<ST<Tƒ= Youth: Max. Se/Tƒ > Maturity: Se x Tƒ (Se=Tƒ) >Old age: Tƒ/Se
But in physical systems they do so through external motions mostly by loosing or acquiring back and forth in space, dimensions of form or dimensions of speed.
There are two concepts that do not appear in classic physics but are essential in understanding how the universe converts energy into information (motion into form): the paradox of Galileo, which allow us to describe those processes as “frozen pictures,” which is the informative point of view, or as changes in the speed or motion of things.
The graph shows the two events combined: when a system acquires forms, it slows down. When a system loses dimensions, it speeds up. Yet to understand this essential process, we must first clarify an error made by physicists who do not use the concept of dimensional form to define “information” but the algebraic “data” concept of a “bit of information.”
Fractal information is related to dimensional form while algebraic information is the simplest dimensional form: bits of broken patterns emitted by waves, which encode those patterns in the distances between the crests or frequency of the wave. But those patterns are the “minimal” pattern of information of the Universe. In that regard, the capacity to store information of any system follows a power law:
Information » X^{ Fractal dimensions of the system}
Yet in the same way, physicists have reduced all the arrows of time, previously defined to a single energetic arrow measured by a single “clocktime”; they have reduced all the forms of information to a single broken frequency pattern. Biology, a more sophisticated science of information, today is able to study how molecules and proteins store information in several dimensions; and that previous law can be deduced of biological studies. Yet physicists have not gone beyond the simplest onedimensional information of lineal waves. They have not even discovered that mass stores much more information than waves in physical bidimensional vortices.
In duality, we study both sciences, physics and biology, and we can compare and use laws of both sciences to find selfsimilar laws in the other discipline. In that sense, Shannon’s standard definition of information is a computerbased definition, of technological science, useful to store information in numbers, with a limited application to the understanding of the universe, which stores information in four dimensions in very complex patterns and enormous volumes. Information is in that broader Universe form, in/form/ation. The simplest information is the onedimensional broken bits of data that divide a line of energy into a pattern. This is what a computer does and what a physicist would understand as information. But in nature, a more precise concept is that of fractalization. Information increases when a continuous flow of energy breaks into patterns and acquires dimensions, bumps and points.
The arrow of information is a transformation of a surface of space, of energy into inner form: a change from lineal, chaotic movement into cyclical, repetitive one; from expansive waves into imploding particles; from disordered, equalized forces of indistinguishable forms extending in space into an ordered hierarchical system of non lineal mass vortices. Its inverse function is the explosion of energy, the dissolution of form, the arrow of death.
Though physics recognizes the inverse arrow of entropy as negantropy—that is, the negation of entropy—it is long overdue to name it properly as form that crystallizes and organizes chaotic lineal energy into cyclical, repetitive patterns of information.
Indeed, Mehaute, a chemist studying fractal patterns and reversals of entropy into information, and other theorists in different disciplines have proved that when a system stops creating energy, entropy, it reverses its arrows of time creating instead information, fractal patterns of form—the future never stops. This also applies to physics in the way form becomes motion and motion becomes form.
The unification equation relates the different scales/membranes of spacetime. Yet for each membrane and particle, we must clarify a final concept, the meaning of dimensions of information and how they disappear, converted into speed and energy or appear as motion and energy slows down, creating form. In the Universe, there are multiple physical species of different fractal nonEuclidean dimensions.
The new mathematics of complex physics means though that a flat plane of two dimensions has a minimal height, as each of its points of the flat network is in itself a world of a smaller scale. Thus, a flat vortex of mass, a bidimensional quark, has smaller gluons and strings, which have smaller dimensions. For that reason, there is equivalence between different mathematical descriptions in different dimensions. A fifthdimensional description of strings is equivalent to a fourdimensional description of quarks, which is equivalent to a threedimensional description of an electronic atom, and so on. It is a general law that all systems of physical mass pack energy in fractal dimensions of form:
Strings (onedimensional dark entropy in a 5D Universe) > bidimensional quarks and gluons in a 4D world > threedimensional electrons
This translates sometimes into different equations for a physical vortex and different power laws and relationships between masses (the static, formal, dimensional perception of a vortex) and speeds (its perception as pure motion). For example, Vo × Ro = K is a bidimensional vortex, which we used to explain in its simplest terms the equivalence principle.
However, the unification equation of charges and cosmological masses happens in a threedimensional world. So we used a threedimensional vortex equation, U.C. × M = w^{2 }× r^{3}, which is the vortex used to unify the threedimensional worlds of cosmological bodies and electronic matter we perceive.
Finally, in the next chapter, when we compare the two families of quarks, top quark particles and strange quark particles, the relationship between their rotational speed and masses follows a threedimensional power law (w^{3} = M). So the world of top quark particles turn at 10 cspeed but it has 1,000 times the mass of the world of strange quark particles that turn at a maximum of cspeed, which obviously means that the world of top quarks has one dimension more than the world of strange quarks. This is further proved by the famous Maldacena conjecture, which studies top quark black holes as fivedimensional string systems, selfsimilar to fourdimensional quark gluon soups.
We are more interested in explaining the concept illustrated in the graph: how our slower threedimensional electronic world will accelerate, acquiring energy/speed and losing a fractal dimension of form, when it becomes transformed into a strange quark condensate since transformations of energy into information take place by warping and unwarping dimensions of form into speed.
A basic case observed in all scales is represented by the previous graph, taken from a SciAm article about the formation of galactic disks, which we used to illustrate the creation of a quark by the crunching of electronic nebulae of three dimensions. The slow rotation of the electron becomes a bidimensional faster quark system. The same process gives birth to a black hole in the cosmological realm, when the nebulae of a star or the gas of a galaxy collapses into a black hole.
All this means, of course, that dimensions are “fractal,” limited dimensions, which never extend to infinity but to the limits of a certain entity of the Universe. Thus, the creation of fractal dimensions of information or its transformation into speed is one of the commonest events of the Universe and at the same time one of the many details of the generator equation of spacetime:
Energy = speed ≤=≥information = fractal dimension
In the case we study in this post, we can consider a simple dimensional game by which slow threedimensional electrons become faster bidimensional quark masses. There is a simple proof of the bidimensionality of our up and down quarks: quarks have onethird or twothirds of the charge/dimensionality of electrons and so we need three quarks with perpendicular orientations called colors to form a threedimensional quark structure able to interact with our threedimensional electrons.
Further on, we must add the interaction of two different mediums and forces, the strong gravitational force of quarks and the electroweak force of electrons. This means that quarks “suck in” electrons, trying to absorb them, to feed on them, so they have implosive, strong gravitational forces, while electrons try to suck in quarks with its electromagnetic force, reason why we use a negative, implosive, absorbing direction for electronic charges.
In other words, quarks use its force to attract and steal momentum from electrons, and electrons use its electromagnetic force to attract and absorb momentum for quarks.
Those are the simplest visual concepts, to understand the interactions of those membranes. Obviously when we enter into topological details, the forms, dimensions, and charges of each of those elements become far more complex.
Two Dimensions. The holographic principle
The paradox of galileo shows the bidimensionality of time information and entropy space, and the equivalence between a motion in time, a distance in space, a frequency and a population, such as:
Space = ∑ T, that is distance = λ ƒ, whereas a quanta of space is multiplied by a frequency in time.
A second fascinating theme of topological physics, with the ad ons of GST is the understanding of why almost every physical equation and system can be written in bidimensional layers. We already explained it. Even Relativity in the so called ADM formalism, which is its natural Hamiltonian formulation (another huge element explained better in GST) is bidimensional.
We are not treating anywhere the complex AMD formalism. I have given up the initial intention of reordering 30 years of research and aim just to put the barebones of GST in this blog before my numerous sicknesses cancel my existence (and find myself every month wanting to work less and less)… So we shall consider only the simplest of all bidimensional elements in physics, the conics.
But before the reason of all this is crystal clear. It is the holographic principle, coupled with Galileo’s px.:
IN THE GRAPH, THE GALILEAN PARADOX:All motion can be seen as sPdistance; all ∆continuous ARE ALSO an ∑∆1 fractal sum of discontinuous parts, joined by force networks. Galileo saw the Saturn’s rings and thought its was a flat continuous disk. In fact is made of ∑ pointparticles turning in cyclical motions, which from far away seem a continuous ‘area’.
The mind thus distorts perception and the whole subject of special relativity can be considered an error of the mind, and a tool to adapt reality to that mindperception (also general relativity as its vortices of accelerated time, curve spacetime only if seen from our scale, but if we enlarge their inner, largerfaster gravitational distancesmotions IT WOULD LIKELY BE euclidean and as such it is likely perceived by the black hole).
In that sense in mathematical physics, the cases in which we can bring the Galilean Paradox to resolve problems, are normally on the ‘verge’ of a given spacetime continuum (cspeed T≥0 in our continuum). It will also be used as a renormalisation process of elimination of infinities and zeros, when we need to consider minimalist effects of the underlying ∆scales and its ‘stress’ in the limits of the carrying capacity of entropy of information of a plane. At that is really pedantic stuff for the initiated, which only gets ‘worked up’ the most arrogant physicists of numerology, we escape it (the infamous 0.00… deviation calculation of the gfactor in the electron, being the most famous ‘engraving’ in the tomb of his author).
In mathematical physics, however, the cases in which we can bring the Galilean Paradox to resolve problems, are normally on the ‘verge’ of a given spacetime continuum (cspeed T≥0 in our continuum); when the need to consider the underlying ∆scales and its ‘stress’ in the limits of its carrying capacity of entropy of information are tested.
RECAP
St¡ence is ultimately concerned with the existence of beings. How they are generated, live and die, regardless of which are its particular nature – those are the foundational questions, which as Leibniz put it, must have answers related to its ultimate substances:
Those substances are the energy and information of the being, product of the combination of its motions and forms, which we call ‘spaceentropylineal motion’ and ‘timeformcyclical motion’; as form is also a motion, albeit cyclical and hence perceived without detail by a slow observer as cyclical form.
In nonabrahamic ‘tribal, historic religions’, where God is a preaxialrational age wor(l)d to signify the subconscious collective of a tribe, God was always considered the ‘form’ or ‘information’ that moulded as ‘logos’, the entropic lineal motions with no form, which where the first ‘existential manifestation of the being’.
To exist therefore it was required that from the immortal lineal motions and cyclical forms of the Universe, a ‘drop of yin’ felt into yang and vice versa. And this is the first moment of creation, when entropy, lineal motion acquires its first curvature of time; or when time, the first cyclical form, breaks its closed nature and emits a wave of communication that resembles its form.
3 Ð: REPRODUCTIVE ENERGY
As all dimotions are entangled, we should notice first that locomotions are in fact reproductive motions as the system in the wave forms reproduce its information in adjacent parts.
So Information is what a reproductive wave of locomotion truly manifest, reason why it IS ENTANGLED WITH THE FUNDAMENTAL dimotion of present reproduction of energy Si=Te, which ‘moves on’ the Dimotions of existence into the next 3Dimotion of reproduction.
A reproductive universe of super organisms tracing worldcycles.The knot of all knot of times cycles is the supœrganism, and the cycle of all cycles the world cycle, so all what we see is a game of supœrganisms and worldcycles: Universe ≈ ∑ð.œ (worldcycles of superganisms). And so we state:‘The Universe is a fractal supœrganism that re≈produces and d=evolves in/form/ation’
Now the most important of those actions are the reproductive actions of information, which ensure the survival of the logic form beyond its demise.
This is an automatic fact; systems that do not reproduce its form, its information, don’t last in time and don’t exist. So all systems have sequential worldcycles of discontinuous reproduction into similar beings.It is also the mathematical definition of a fractal: a fractal has a generator equation that reproduces the system. We are merely studying the fractal generator of the Universe.Systems are fractals, which as the Universe does, constantly reproduce information and they do so by traveling from a seminal to an organic scale of being. This travel is reproductive, and so all what we observe are waves of reproductive, seminal supœrganisms, performing a world cycle:
In the graph the obnoxious @singularities dedicated to reproduce actions that become formal motions iterated through the imprinting of ∆1 seeds of exi=st¡ence. Constant waves of form crossing scales of the fifth dimension up and down in reproductive cycles, with astounding fidelity replicate per in secula seculorum the ‘elements’ of a game, which is infinite in time and space and identical repetitions of the limited number of ‘selfs’.And now, only now when everybody has long ago abandoned the web, because they expect reality to mold to the designs of humind membrains, with its minimalist notion of reality and its properties, which only can be expressed in maths, etc. etc. we shall deal with the great question, what is God, and the UNIVERSE.MERELY AS THE GRAPH SHOWS, A REPRODUCTIVE FRACTAL, a constant orgasm of reproduction, a super organism, that is the purpose of it all.It must be understood that the order of a world cycle of existence differs slightly from our classification of dimensions for the whole scenario, as the particlehead becomes in biological organisms dominant and could be in that sense considered the 3D element which guides the present 1D limbs/potentials and 3Dreproductive age, which is the middle on a world cycle.
This fundamental difference which must be clarified requires also a thorough change of ‘naming’ in this blog, which I will carry on distinguish the Dimensions of time as ‘AGES’ to signify this difference. Thus in sequential ages, the mind/head particle plays the key role in the 3rd informative age, even if it is formed from birth as the 2nd topological dimension of the being (as the fetus does follow the general order and creates last the reproductive organs, mixture of the informative and limbic, moving elements of the being).So we come to the fundamental element of reality, the fundamental particle, the super organism, œ, traveling through a life and death ‘worldcycle’ of existence, which is a travel through the fifth dimension that ends invariably in entropic death – but through the reproduction of the T.œ ensures the immortality of its ilogic form. Before its mind of angular momentum or particlehead dominates the 3rd age and leads to its entropic death.
Specifically we shall state now that what Physicists study as time, IS only present time, instants in which they measure simultaneously the locomotions of beings, with ‘derivatives’ – so reducing change to its minimal expression within a single slice of the whole flow of time. The question then to define is the absolute arrows of time, of past and future, missed in that description of time, as a mere instant of ‘spacemotion’ v=∂s/∂t. In other words, when we ad the arrow of entropy and dissolution and the arrow of wholeness, of evolution of form, THE SCALAR ARROWS OF DEEP TIMESPACE, which one is the past and the future?
So when we wrote the metric equation of the fifth dimension as:
So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).
So we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discovered their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, also called Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein, which defined time as the fourth dimension of space, since physicists merely was used it to measure spatial changes in location.
Space is SYNCHRONOUS VISION OF A DOMAIN OF TIME MOTIONSSynchronicity is the essential logic element of the scalar, social structure of the Universe
.3 only topologies of all systems of Nature. Internal ‘bidimensional’ and external classic dimensions.
5Ðimotional beings, are complex entities that travel through the 5 dimensions of spacetime, as they move through it, tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence. Such a simple game of Ðimotional beings, can be observed from many perspectives, in an entagled Universe, in which can at least observe constantly those 5 Ðimotions, Social Generation, entropic death, locomotion, reproduction and gauging of information, aeiou… borriquito como tu.The devil though is in the details so the first obvious question we must answer is what MEANS in REAL terms, the fact that all what exists is MADE OF SPATIAL topologies and TEMPORAL ages, of Space and Time?
The answer is fascinating, as there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies.Alas we can break our concept of internal change more properly in 3 ‘topological variations’, we shall call the 3 ‘first dimotions’ of the Universe.And so the fact that we are made of spacetime means ultimately we are made of 3 type of organic topological dimotions – and we say organic because as it will turn out all systems of life are made of ensembles of those 3 topological dimotions. And this justifies our concept of ‘relational vital spacetime beings’ that is beings made of spacetime with motion. Since as Aristotle put it – when things move they are alive. Welcome then to the study of ‘vital spacetime’.
The insight that there are only 3 topologies in 4 and 5D nature is the key mathematical finding to fully account for topological evolution, the ternary nature of all systems and its functions and physiological networks, resolved NOT through intelligent design but through the limiting fact that there are only 3 topologies in space in the Universe. So by force al systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the next graphs:
So this is the second ternary spatial element of reality:moving limbs/potentials x Ohead/particles = Øbody waves
This is the simplest expression of the FRACTAL GENERATOR of spacetime beings, as all of them will display those ternary topologies.The study of the ‘fractal generator of spacetime beings’ (ab. Γst, Γ, Gst) will be the key formalism of the expansion of timespace ‘stiences’ achieved in this blog. It will fully give the model the needed connections with the topologic, organic and numerical equations of classic ‘science’. Stience obviously is the slightly modified term – a necessary pattern of the blog to upgrade concepts without making them too strange – we shall use for all classic sciences, now that we know they study vital spacetime beings, such as those of the next graph.
The 3 elements of all systems, lineal/flat limbs/potentials; spherical, tall heads/particles and its hard membranes of dark matter, trunks and skins accomplish the 3 functions of motion, energetic reproduction and informative perception in all systems, varying to adapt the system to its larger world.
Let us start with a visual, topologic analysis of the dimensions of spacetime, both internally (first graph) and externally (second graph):Internal dimensions are topologic, bidimensional varieties: spheres of maximal information, planes of maximal motion/distance, and hyperbolic body/waves of maximal reproduction.
The full understanding of these 3 parts of the being comes when we consider ‘bidimensional’, topological networks, which will show to correspond in form and function, as topology is geometry with inner motion: a topological variety can ‘change its inner form’ and remain the same as long as it does NOT tear.So we talk in fact of 3 topologies of space=form +time=motion that will define in vital formal and moving terms all entities in existence.
And so in a single plane of reality, we perceive systems as ensembles of the 3 varieties of space, (to which we soon will add the 2 scalar dimensions of entropic parts, and social wholes). Moreover as topology is form with motion, topology ARE spacetime Dimensions:So we can build reality with the 3 dimensions of space and its motions in time, we shall call ÐIMOTIONS or actions of spacetime.In the graph, a first hint to how the 3 ‘vital dimensions of spacetime’ ensemble into parts and organic wholes in all physical, biological and social systems; since there are only 3 topological forms (geometries with motion) in the Universe.
So evolutionary topology BECOMES a new key discipline to understand how the forms of species evolve as ensembles of the 3 ‘form of space & functions of time that define 3 topological varieties of spacetime in all the fractal organisms of the Universe made of lineal maximal motionsfunctions (limbs/potentials), maximal informative storages (spherical heads/particles) and its iterative, hyperbolic combinations (bodywaves); which is the dominant element of the organism as it embodies the iterative, ‘present’ discontinuous reproduction of all the parts of the being that defines the immortality of the ‘information’ it stores, and the essence of any ‘fractal’
The 3 conserved forms of the Universe, angular and lineal momentum, and vital energy form in the fractal Universe the 3 parts of a T.œ or fractal point, NonE with an inner volume of spacetime through which multiple parallels can cross. The rules of geometric and biologic engagement of those points to form waves, networks and topological organisms, define the nonæ biologic of the organic Universe based in the a(nti)symmetric laws of similarity, parallelism and perpendicularity expressed in 5 ¬Æ postulates that substitute the classic axiomatic method of definition of logic and geometry.
The goal of all coexisting systems displayed in 3 scales of the fifth dimension is to reach the maximal symbiosis through synchronicity based in the ‘different speeds’ of clocks according to spatial size of the parts of the being across its ¡±1 scales.
As only present is conserved, meaning ¡logically that the past becomes erased and the multiple potential futures extinct as only one becomes, the conservation of present quantities (momentum in physics, with its similar term of energy and so on). But there is an infinitesimal flux always happening from past through present to future and from future to past (without moving through present in the death act) to make this eternal present dynamic.
This ‘quanta of present’ then is what we might call space, and consider space to be the region in which a relative infinitesimal cut of the flow of time of the fifth dimension, in all its future potentials and past, thinning realities coexist:Present = Past Operandi FutureThe nature of that operandi, though depends on the mind, as it is the mind operandi of a pool of connections between past and future call present much larger than we huminds can realize.WE HAVE highlighted the key ‘logic elements’ of those systems, which are profound laws of structure that define the Universe in its most abstract form. A physicist however will use the 3 conserved elements of nature, and call time cycles, ‘angular momentum’, singularities, whose mind is not perceived but needs stillness and so develops a stop and go steady motion, ‘lineal momentum’, and the vital energy x information included within it energy and say the 3 are converted. Then if he were able to break those cyclical times, singularity motions and vital energy into ∞ beings, voila, we would be speaking of the same:
The Universe is a tapestry of time§pace cycles, which are organisms of vital energy enclosed by an angular momentum, selfcentered into singularities with an Aristotelian, lineal inertial selfish mind, programmed by an obsession, to survive, last in time, performing its actions, the program of exist¡ence, beyond a reasonable finite presence – this thirst for immortality through selfish actions selfcentered in the lineal inertial singularity moving ahead in open freedom, however is always defeated by the larger whole that pressures us into making a closed, conservative path, an informative world cycle. And we indeed oblige, as the ego paradox produces a systemic bias towards our own self, exhausting the energy of our vital space.. till we die – explore back into a zero sum. Welcome to reality.
This fundamental reality however was lost when to reach higher accurate measure of distances and time periods mathematical physics started to use a single time clock to measure all the lifetimes of beings (the mechanical clock) and a single space continuum to unify all measures of distances.What we lost then was the capacity to understand the multiple elements of the Universe, as we had now a single human point of view on scale of size in space and time duration (the meter, the second). Soon this artificial ‘cartesian graph’ of space and time, as it did not fit the ‘real form of time clocks’ (cyclical motions) and the multiple scales of spacesize occupied by ∞ beings, became also an artificial ‘background spacetime’ and so it lost its nature as the substance of reality the yin and yang, the energy and information, the space and time duality.
So today we have a deep knowledge of details of beings which we can manipulate scientifically but are completely lost in what regards the fundamental principles and laws of nature.Those principles are relational space and time, and as a consequence MOST PROPERTIES of beings, including its topological structure as systems, its time ages, and its world cycles can be deduced of the ultimate properties of space and time and its ‘energetic combinations’.So when we study a being we shall use a method we have called the Ðisomorphic method, which consists on studying the entity as a world cycle born of a seed or mindsingularity that will evolve, reproduce and create a superoerganism that will live its lifetime cycles and ages in an orderly fashion, because that is what time does with vital space – puts it through a process of life and death; and so as we are all vital spaces, we all live a world cycle.This said, we shall connect the concept of topological space and a simultaneous super organism and time and a worldcycle; as those are the essential objective concepts of ‘vital space’, a part of reality occupied by an organized, simultaneous, singularity center volume of energy, and time cycles, a duration in time made of a series of finite=closed motions=time cycles.And this allow us to define logically both a block of time and vacuum space, Let us see how.
Conclusion: The simplest 1, 2, 3… 4th, 5th dimensions.
The Universe is a superoganism of 5 Dimotions of symmetric spacetime. Whereas time means motion and space form. Yet since due to Galilean>Einstein’s relativity we cannot distinguish motion from form, for each dimension of space, we must consider a symmetric dimensions of time (the form we see in motion).
Since as we can only compare entities with equal number of dimensions we must write, S=T, as the fundamental law of the Universe, which is display in all kind of beings.The equivalent of this law of balance in physics, is a Lagrangian of the form:Sp (size in space) x Tiƒ (speed of time clocks of information) = Constant ∫ST∂st=0And or, the laws of conservation of momentum: S x T (mv, etc.), and energy its integral in a closed cycle.Two simple laws of conservation and least time in which all of physics is based; albeit explained with complicated ‘pedantic’ obtuse laws, such as the Noether theorem, group theory, etc. which obviously need them to go back to school and learn what the magic of maths and the origin of those laws are in 11D.This is the law of balance and coexistence of reality that make humans and civilisations coexist as single super organisms. Cells and organisms coexists in a single individual, and so, the Universe is a beautiful organic, fractal of scales of reality which follow the same goals of reproducing information to become immortal in ‘states of balance’.
And those laws apply also to history and economy systems that should try to find such balances to survive.Thus we can start studying beings of one dimension of space and one dimension of timemotion, simultaneously. As reality requires that for each dimension of space we perceive one of time.It can allow us to construct bidimensional (minimal being) type of species, which go on constructing the reproductive equations of a bidimensional world of spacetime
.So the simplest analysis are those in which we observe a ‘none point in space, a point with breath’, as a single dimension, coupled with a dimension of lineal motion, the first dimension of time.Then we can consider holographic bidimensional entities with dimensions of form and motion:In the graph we see systems with information and motion=time; systems with entropy and form (bidimensional space), and 4D combinations, of which the basic one is light spacetime (our electronic perception of both being tuned to such ‘minimal quanta’ of our perceived reality.Next we can consider combinations of 3 dimensions of form and 3 dimensions of space; and here we exhaust the existence of a system in single spacetime continuum.We can describe all systems with 3 ‘fractal parts’ with 3 topologies in space and 3 functions in time, and as it happens since a 4Dimensional system have only 3 possible topologies, that is enough to understand the processes of topological evolution that complete our work in evolution, through 3 topological ages, dominated by each of those 3 elements, and describe a generator equation for all of them:
Γ; $pe: lineal limbs/fields of entropy <ØST hyperbolicbodywaves>Oparticle/heads of information.
All dimensions are motions and forms. Yet we have explained a few times that ‘motion’ implies reproduction of form in a lower scale of the being. You do NOT MOVE, you reproduce yourself in an adjacent region, and to do so you have to ‘reorganise’ smaller ∆1 cells/atoms/individuals, with at least a ‘collective wave’ of information (genes, quantum numbers, memes distributed simultaneously to all of them). So all motions, all time dimensions MUST happen between two relative ∆ and ∆1 scales as a wave of information that imprints a lower scale:In 5D metric LocoMotion is as the next graph shows a reproduction of form in adjacent regions as a wave displaces switching then into particlegauging state; hence the Universe reproduces information:
In the graphs, we see simple, basic motions of the lowest scales of particles and waves, which move reproducing in a lower scale. Moreover modern topology describes forms always as topological networks.
But then departing from that primary entropic motion, the growth of reproduction will cause the different worldcycles of beings; which will lead to the system’s final warping into a cyclical vortex of time, mass or charge or any other particle of any other scale. And the mathematical or organic detail and mirror will put on it will always end up shown as the three ages of time or if we put a different mirror on it with less more detail we can analyse the system as we do in general in this blog with other biological systems, as the product of an… organic world cycle.The steps of locomotion require the reproduction of the form in the adjacent scale by reforming lower planes to the level of the atom forces, or else the being is not reproduced thoroughly.
As such locomotion is the FIRST FORM OF REPRODUCTION OF THE UNIVERSE. If we consider the dimotion of informative gauging the ‘creative’ form in which forces become slowed down and ‘form’ an image of software according to a hardware that creates the mind, true locomotion happens when the reproduction of form by translation of the being takes place.So to define a single spacetime continuum form we need at least two scales, that of parts and wholes which form together a topological network of any of those 3 varieties:So when we talk of a truly transformative motion in the fifth dimension which does NOT surface back into the ∆scale as reproductive motions and topological transformations of networks do, we need two jumps in the FOURTH, social evolutionary and entropic fifth dimension.
4D & 5 D TOGETHER: ∆±¡
4TH DIMOTION: SOCIAL ORGANIC EVOLUTION
∆+1: ‘Love each other as I have loved you’Jesus, on the arrow of eusocial evolution, the sharing that merges a group of identical believers into a social god of a higher plane of existence.
∆: ‘A human being is part of a whole, called by us the Universe, a part limited in ðime and §pace. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings, as something separated from the rest–a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circles of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.’Einstein, on the relationship between human dust of ðime§pace and the whole organic Universe; that is on the 5th dimotion of existence.All this said, the essence of the Universe is the SYMMETRY between space forms and time dimensions, expressed in the world cycle of existence, where the 5 Dimensions of the being seen in simultaneity form a super organism and seen in sequential time form a world cycle.In the next graphs we see some samples (from the reduced version with only energy and information networks) of those super organisms, and the human and economic systems.
The only way to explain the process of history is considering humans ‘citizenscells’ of social super organisms, nations and civilisations. It then becomes simple to understand all the apparent contradictions of our world, and its mass actions, both in human systems guided by economic=reproductive ‘bodynetworks’, and informative=political and cultural ‘brains’.
It is the hypothesis of the organic paradigm of systems sciences, applied in this blog to understand all phenomena related to cultures, and human societies, on one side ‘coded by memes’, and eco(nomic)systems on the other, coded by digital flows of money.
In the graph, selfexplanative the reality of this planet and the two dominant super organisms. Unfortunately in a compacracy the dominant super organism, free citizen of the free market with all rights to credit, anonymous law ‘impunity’, and control of political power is NOT the super organism of mankind, its citizens and human mothers, but the companymother of machines and its FinancialMedia (informative machines head)/industrialmilitary (energetic and entropic machines) system, fast evolving into a global super organism with the digital language/head of money, which is used in its 90% not to serve the needs of man but the evolution and reproduction of those machines, which displace us from this terraformed planet.So the REAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE OF THE UNIVERSE IS GST, General Systems theory or ORGANICISM, which understand the fractal, organic coexisting nature of reality:
In the graphs, the Universe is a fractal of three arrows of time, entropic motions, information and its energetic combinations, in all its systems, and this ‘science of the XXI century’ Hawking (complexity or systems sciences) applies to all biologic and physical and social systems, extended across three ‘scales’, the cellular/atomic/ territorial entropic scale of parts, which become part of whole biological, thermodynamic, national scales, part of a larger whole, the society or gravitational cosmos:
The metric law of the fractal 5D organic Universe: smaller systems evolve faster.
When considering those superoganisms (ab. supœrganisms, œ), there are some basic laws of which the most important are the metric equation of the scalar, fractal Universe: Spe x Tiƒ = ∆, which means smaller systems run faster time cycles, and carry more information, in the frequency of those cycles. So smaller systems live shorter, but code informatively larger systems: quantum numbers code atoms, genes code biological systems, and cultural memes, ‘idologies, instruments and social customs’ code human super organisms of history.
So while racism is absurd because genes code individual humans, memetics IS the genetic cultural system that ‘controls’ waves of human beings with identical memes, ‘cultural people’, who believe those memes and behaves simultaneously. THIS IS THE MAIN HYPOTHESIS OF WORK, of biohistory: the ideas of cultures matter because they create the memetic super organisms of history. And some ARE dedicated to evolve the metalearth, what we shall call ‘animetal cult(ure)s’, and some are dedicated to evolve the human earth. And we MUST side for those cultures of the tree of life because in the long term ARE the only ones that ensure the survival of mankind.
So despite the dogeatdog individualist memes our our entropic age of mankind, dissolved and consumed by weapons and hate memes, the true Maslow pyramid of needs of species is social, based in the ‘arrow of love’ that structures parts into wholes from atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets and galaxies, all of them submitted to the same physiological laws that construct super organisms:In the graph, human beings in its ‘entropic’ death age as a supœrganism of history have completely forgotten the real, organic fractal 5D Universal pyramid of drives of existence, toppled by social communication, which in its maximal form – eusocial love, structures the scales of the Universe.
∆±i: THE ¡LOGIC OF SCALES.
Why the fifth dimension is the dominant arrow of futures.
In the graph the spacetime planes of the Universe, ∆±i , which according to scale structure the 5th dimension in parts that become wholes, and since wholes come after parts, which must exist to sustain them, we talk of a temporal absolute arrow of future, regarding its ∆ scales, such as ∆1 will always be the relative past of ∆. The Fractal, organic structure of the Universe in scales of size is what we call formally ‘the 5th dimension’.
As we study in depth all the elements of the scalar Universe, a fact will surprise us; when we try to localise ‘mathematically’ the fifth dimension. As it will turn out that it encodes the algorithm of time, all the potential waves and particles of time, possible, according to a probability related to the ‘closeness’ they follow the program of the algorithm.
But that is far way out, for advanced 5D students along the century (; For now we shall try to keep it simple, and explain you why the 5th dimension encodes all the flow of time, from ‘pastsimpler space’, through present (the human scale of perception) into future, with multiple probabilistic paths, which do collapse at a point in a single future>present>past.
It follows from the fact that the simple, iterative scheme of evolving from individuals into universals – from social evolution, that there is a new dimension of time and information more than space & entropy, which in poetic terms we can call the dimension of eusocial love, which is the arrow of future of the Universe, in as much as those ‘whole’ new scales need casually to have its parts born ‘before’ (logic meaning of causal future); and because they survive better as wholes, stronger than individuals (biological meaning of evolutionary future).
Same happens in human societies. Since those nations, which are able to share efficiently and justly energy and information among its individuals, do NOT collapse in wars and r=evolutions. It follows that we can deduce from the general laws of systems ‘stiences’, the laws of social sciences that could create an efficient, just perfect human world.
But as we shall see when study in depth some specific systems, in as much as those scales coexist in the same ‘space’, they must be displaced in time, to be part of reality, due to a simple ‘Pauli exclusion principle’, better known in physics than in other systems. There are indeed forms equal in informationtime, which occupy then the same region of space (bosons) and forms with different informationtime, which occupy different regions in space. And this rather mystical fact will have enormous consequences for the motions on the 5th dimension, we shall explore in depth in different posts.
We can say in that sense that the ‘physical existence’ of those scales and its parts are displaced in time; through very real but ‘spooky effects’ (resonance, simultaneity, synchronicity etc.) which in the more formal parts of this web we shall explain with enough mathematical rigor to connect it with classic science.
The integration of all sciences under similar laws is the goal of Philosophy of Science achieved by the organic, fractal models of Systems Sciences or Complexity (ab. GST: General Systems Theory), which explores how ‘parts’ come together into wholes, through networks that share its energy and information.
So physical, ∆=1,2,3, 7, 9 systems evolve from particles into atoms, molecules and states of matter, through informative, gravitational networks, exchanging energetic, electromagnetic flows.
Biological systems, ∆=4,5 evolve from molecules into cells, organisms and social super organisms, through genetic networks of information and golgi and blood networks that distribute energy to all the cells of the system.
And human beings ∆=4,5,6 form social super organisms, join by verbal, legal networks of information and economic networks that re=produce the welfare, energy goods our species need to survive.
Finally companymothers of machines, ∆=5, 6 evolve into a global super organism, ruled by digital networks of financial information, (prices, salaries, stocks, internets) and energetic networks (roads, electric lines).
Now an important ‘prime’ about the 5th dimension of spacetime.
Now this is the ‘NonEuclidean, expanded geometry of the fractal world’.
What about its nonaristotelian temporal logic of multiple ‘time clocks”?
This again must be also understood from the beginning. And the easiest way to do it is with the so called holographic concept.
Because the change of paradigm implies huge changes in the underlying truths of the universe and the old simplistic human ways of thought, so as we change the concept of space and break the continuum into infinite scales of noneuclidean growing points. We must explode the concept of a single timeduration into infinite time cycles of a finite duration, as the cycle of life and death of all beings.
But when we convert time into a cycle, we must add a new dimension to make the cycle. A line is onedimensional, a cycle two dimensional, it has ‘height’. So where we get that second time dimension? I just have said it: in the height of the cycle. It is the holographic principle, a trendy word physicists coined without proper understanding – as they found that information is bidimensional. And indeed it is. Information is carried as in a computer that measures in hertz its informative power in the form of time cycles, and the faster a time cycle turns (remember there are multiple clocks and multiple speeds of its beats), the more information it accumulates.
But if information and time is now bidimensional, so must be space, flat planes of bidimensional space, made of networks of points, each point a cell, an atom, a galaxy… part of the bidimensional plane.
The proof of this of course is also available for decades. We have found the Universe as far as we see it is a flat plane, made of cyclical clocklike vortices of time, called galaxies, where information grows as the cycles accelerate towards its central black hole, and the rise in height around the black hole, towards its tall singularity.
General Systems sciences therefore is the formalism of the ‘alternative, far more advanced philosophy of science’ to that of Newtonian physics, with its concept of a single background absolute spacetime in which entities likemechanisms, whose ultimate substances are ignored, move in simple lineal motions.
In general systems sciences, as Leibniz affirmed, and then quantum and relativity proved, we do not exist in a background, abstract spacetime mathematical plane, but we ARE MADE OF clocklike bits of information of different speeds (time relativity) and fractal, moving quanta of spatial energy, which are complementary systems (quantum theory), coexisting across 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension. So all systems can be described with the same laws, derived from the properties of spatial energy, temporal information and the metric of the 5th dimension, which together give birth to a set of 3 x 3 + 0 ‘isomorphic’=equal laws, which describe the ‘existence’ of all beings. For that reason we call also the Fractal Generator, the Function of Existence.
As we all beings follow a ‘world cycle’ of existence, made of a series of actions of absorption and emission and reproduction of energy and information, which might vary in quality and quantity but are essentially the same process for all beings of Nature. So in Gst, we go much further than a simple shallow, external description of the motions of beings, as physicists do, fully exploring all the whys of reality, with all the languages available to human thought, in a jump of understanding that should start a new age of knowledge, once the model is fully related to the details and specific laws and jargons of each science.
It must be understood that if the formalism of GSΤ is verified as all seems to prove by the laws of the scientific method, it represents a remarkable change in our scientific look of the Universe, unlike anything that has happened since Einstein and Darwin and Copernicus, made previous extreme revolutions of human thought, regarding the nature of time and the cycles of existence of its beings. A change of paradigm of course does take time, but it is unavoidable that humans and its growingly organic machines, do that jump of awareness about the full properties of the Universe, which go well beyond the reductionist view of putting on it a mirror with a single motion of time, entropy or energy, as physicists do.
The Universe constructs superorganisms, through a causal process, departing from simple, amorphous flat surfaces of energies – herds of NonEuclidean points with lineal motion.
It is a simple ternary causal event, which is different from the causality of what we call the cycle of life, Sp>X>Tƒ, yet still an essential chain that we shall see constantly in the Universe.
So the next question is how the universe constructs reality, departing from its generator equation. And the answer is: constructing superorganisms, in a causal order, e>∆>X>S.
A form fractalizes, becomes informed, and loses energy= speed=motion. For example, a line becomes a Koch fractal or breaks into a Cantor dust of selfsimilar cells; a line becomes a p∆cycle. In this, simplest and most repeated Sp>Tƒ, we can write 1>3>Pi: a line has reproduces from past to future 3 selfsimilar motions, then it coils into a p∆cycle.
The next stage would be then the reproduction of that cycle in a lateral, new dimension of height. In this manner, we have obtained 3 fractal iterations: the line has become a cycle (or a Koch curve or any other fractal topology with more form and dimensions), which has become a tube.
Sp>Tƒ>X (symbol of Reproduction and sex, born of the product and combination of Sp X Tƒ).
If duality covers simple events, mostly SpTƒ combinations, when we construct an organism we are playing at least with a causal 4sequential arrow of time, Energy becomes fractal information, which reproduces laterally and so the light of lengthspeed becomes a time cycle with rotational speed w, whose frequency curries more information, and such form moves like a Maxwell scree reproducing in the 3 dimension of width. Sp>Tƒ>X.
Yet, this rather mechanical sequence of creation of a fractal 3 dimensional Universe becomes far richer in forma and meaning when we add the 4^{th} Eusocial love, of Social time the longest arrow that finally creates a form of stable spacetime that exists, a superorganism: Sp>Tƒ>X>SP X TƑ. Since as time goes by, entities evolve into more complex organisms by the power of love – by sharing energy and information in social networks. The 4^{th} arrow of time evolves socially parts into wholes, waves, herds and organisms:
Particles gather into atoms that evolve into molecules that associate into cells that gather into organisms that create social networks – planetary ecosystems, which are part of solar systems, herded into galaxies that form Universes. Those processes of social evolution occur thanks to the creation of social networks among selfsimilar (hence reproduced) beings, in search of the same type of energy (hunting herds) or information (organisms joined by nervous/informative and blood/energetic networks).
Thus, the arrow of organic evolution derives from the arrow of information that allows entities to come closer and ‘act in parallel’ under the command of an informative language, which we formalize with the social symbol, S. And its reason of existence is to elongate the survival of the organic system: Any cyclical vortex of time accelerates inwards, losing energy/surface as it increases its informative speed.
When we generalize that concept to all Timespace systems, it turns out that the arrow of information dominates the universe, wrinkling and warping any cyclical system, which will exhaust its energy, converted into form. Thus, our time clocks and vital spaces increase constantly their information, diminishing its energy space, towards a 3^{rd} age of excessive warping and limited energy that will not last forever.
Since the cycles of exchange of energy and information, the geometric beats of reality between expansive and implosive, entropy and informative states, are limited in their repetitions by accidental errors of all kind, which establish the need for reproductive and social arrows in order to ensure the survival or immortality of those ‘patterns of form’ – entities made of lineal fields and bodies of energy; cyclical particles and heads of information, who must be reproduced to ensure a longer existence. This means that only those species able to increase their existence in time by reproducing its form and in space by evolving socially into bigger entities survive.
Recap: The 4 main arrows of time cannot be reduced without losing detail, but they can be philosophically and ‘biologically’ grouped as ‘organic systems’. Those organic systems that synchronize accumulate and organize clocklike arrows of cyclical time, are in fact all selfsimilar, as all can be described with the 4 elements, ∑S<=>T of organisms: cells, networks of energy and information and reproductive systems.
Dark space: cat alleys and parallel Universes.
Now, each super organism is a network because it has an enormous amount of dark spacetimes it does NOT see, the cat alleys which the mind does not neeed.
Discontinuity is essential to pangeometry and the continuity axioms no needed to build them.
The ilogic of NonAristotelian, NonEuclidean geometry, of the ternary causality of a π cycle, made of 3 diameters in its perimeter means that the diameters of the protective membrane blind the system, who only sees what its connected sensors see.
Thus the 3 diameters in the simplest 1sphere system (a disk) cover 96% of a piperimeter surface, letting the point of view in the center, see only a 4% of light, through the holes of the membrane, leaving π3/π 96% of dark matter for the logic mind to see without the glaring of light.
This is in fact what we do NOT see of the Universe across the halo membrane of our spiral galactic disk (proportion of dark energy and matter).
So we can consider that our electronic eyes miss 96%, which is the volume beyond our perceived scales of the 5th dimension, which however exists in the larger russian doll of gravitation.
Epistemology is based in the isomorphisms and Observer’s paradox that determine the truth humans perceive of different scales of the Universe and its degree of distance given by the relative distance in the 5th dimension between the human Uo plane of perception and the U∆ plane of the species observed such as:
Max. truth = Max. information (minimal distortion of data) x Max. Energy (minimal loss of data)
And since maximal information is lost in relationship to the i distance of the Human Uo observer, and maximal energy loss in relationship to the +i distance, we can easily write truth as a function in sciences of the absolute ±∆ distance of the science to the human observer:
Max. Truth = Min. Distance = Min. Human Uo observer – U∆ Plane observed = Min. 0i = Min.± i
Max. Truth = Min. i
This is the fundamental law of epistemology.
Truth is an inverse function of the distance between observed and observer in ALL the dimensions of fractal space & cyclical time.
The Whole Truth of any system is only possessed by the system, which has in itself all its information. Still we can do ceteris paribus analysis of specific ‘parts’, ‘dimensions’ and ‘social groups’ of the whole, to achieve further clarity and detail, which is what humans have always done, since after all they do not have a full Dimensional space time theory of the Universe.
THUS THE FIRST DEFINITION IS THAT OF ABSOLUTE TRUTH=PROBABILITY=EXISTENCE=1.
In the graph, the 3 5D Spacetime elements that structure all physical/biological/social systems of the Universe:
 Τhe 3 only topological forms≈functions of Nature, lineal, energetic fields/limbs/territories of space; hyperbolic waves/bodies/reproductive spacetimes and cyclical, informative particles/heads/languages, which create in space all ternary fractal organisms of reality:
Spe (limbs/fields/territories) < ØSt (wavebodyreproductive class) > Τiƒ (particleheadruling class)
As topologies are form in motion, we can see those 3 topologies synchronically in space and they form a ternary organic structure, or we can see them in actions throughout time:
 Τhen those systems enact a series of actions of absorption, emission and reproduction of energy and information (±∆e, exi, i), which develop in time in 2 phases, a long period of increasing information with 3 ages (youth: Max. e, reproductive age, Max. e x I , old age, Max. I) followed by a short period of erasing information or death, such as both become a zero sum:
Life arrow of information (E>I) + death, bigbang arrow (I < E) = 0. Whereas > is an informative, implosive motion and < an energetic, entropic one. So we can write the fractal generator in time
Spe (youth) > St (reproductive age) > Τiƒ (old age) << Deathbig bang: Spe
So the interaction of the topologies of information and energy and its combination define a Universe made of fractal beings of spacetime, which complete world cycles of existence, across all the scales of the Universe.
It is the 3rd element needed for an organic description of reality, as all those systems, will not only have 3 organic topologies in space and 3 ages in its world cycle, but will be organised through 3 scales of relative size that coexist as parts of bigger wholes:
∆1 (atomic, cellular, memetic scale) > ∆ (thermodynamic, organic, individual scale) >∆+1 (gravitational, ecosystemic, social)
We can see in the graph, above, some assembly of ternary systems made with the 3 topologies of the Universe, and below the scientific scale of spatial sizes and time clocks, which compose the different spacetime beings of the Universe.
SPACE BECOMES FRACTAL BY REPRODUCTION OF PRESENT BODYWAVESWORKING CASTES, of the ternary topology of the Universe, Space = Max. E x I, a 5dimensional fractal reproductive space with 3 motions upwards, downwards in scales or with a present simultaneous speed, in presentpastpresent waves of simultaneous motion, networking in information, non local at distance, as the wave of form, of information, reproduces through a fertile space of energy, the being becomes and as it becomes emerges, fetal entity of a perfect supeorganism, the wave of motions who resembles organic livings living and dying travelling through the scales o the 5th dimension.
We can see the different scales of the Universe all of them including humans, below, described with those 3 elements , ∆SΤ, and its sets of 3×3 + œ laws – to notice that the minimal and maximal scales, both theoretically (cyclicallineal nanoscopic and macroscopic scales, and atoms and galaxies) have very similar parameters;hence the hypothesis of a scalar Universe of infinite, ∆±∞ scales.
Below we see a human being and its 3 topological digestiveenergetic, reproductivehormonal and nervous/informative systems, which subdivide in 3 more systems, for a total of 3×3+0 subsystems which are used in medicine to describe completely the human being; whereas the 0integrative whole system is the brain, itself a ‘fractal point’ of the next ∆+1 social, memetic scale of mankind. In the left we see the 3 ages of human beings, between conception in the ∆1 seminal scale and death back to the flat energy world of disconnected cells.
As such we shall be able to describe existence, as a travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension.
Τhe beauty, precision and essential homologic poetry of the fractal, organic, selfreproductive, scalar, absolutely relative, infinite, immortal Universe we shall describe with the formalism of 5D Spacetime systems, is a new door to our communion with the whole Universe of which are all a mere part, made to its image and likeness.
The law of uncertainty
From the fundamental law of epistemology it follows that perception of a being diminishes as we reach a higher i, that is a higher distance between the Uo human observer and the U±∆ superorganism of nature we study.
From other posts the reader should recognize that all what exists in the pantheist, absolutely relative, fractal spacetime Universe is a super organism extending across U±∆ scales of existence, and if we take man Uo, life, U1, matter, U2, Galactic and light spacetime, U±3, and the cosmos U±4 such uncertainty of perception is higher in the quantum and cosmic world (Heisenberg uncertainty dark matter and energy). And we do not recognize those organic properties to galaxies, better studies as galacells, with DNA black holes, star mitochondria and a halo of dark proteins, strangelets that seals it from outsiders.
But all systems do have those organic properties only observed in very close perception.
The organic structure of the Universe is proved by a series of common properties, which we call ‘isomorphisms’ that all systems follow, themselves based in the existence of 3 ‘logicomathematical’ properties observed from that Universe:
Topological Properties studied by ŒGeometry Temporal Properties studied by ÆAlgebra Infinitesimal Properties studies by Analysis.
The result is an organic structure or fundamental particle of the Universe, the super organism, U±∆, which exists in an interval of planes of the 5th dimension, ±∆, as observed from the human Uo, point of perception. For this reason we must always introduce the epistemological bias established by the uncertainty (Min. Truth = Max.Tƒ) between human observer and observable. Thus we perceive ALL the properties of human beings, including internal vital spacetime perception, or consciousness of one self.
As we come out of the human mind, our perception diminishes, so we already deny consciousness to animal life and plants because we do NOT see their brain (in plants on the roothead). And then as we move even further, we deny organic laws to matter, at i=≥±3.
This is the absolute truth of a system, which is only perceived in the vital spacetime system and its connected U±4 planes, relative to the Uo perceptive point.
From this maximal knowledge systems reduce knowledge by ignoring, automatizing and not perceiving most of its U±3, 4 åctions (simple motions, simple perception) and focusing its will into the complex U±2 åctions.
This will establish a first duality in knowledge:
– Subjective knowledge from the p.o.v. of the perceiver, which has a ‘spherical’, polar mind perspective/frame of reference/
– Objective perception, from an external perspective, which will be normally, a hyperbolic, ± dual perception.
Energetic perception, from the ‘slavish’ point of view, of the ∆1 scales, which will be an elliptic perception.
Now, if we do an objective perception the purpose will be to absorb ad maximal knowledge on the 5×2 isomorphisms of reality, in that vital spacetime, or being. So the maximal knowledge will be what we call generally a 10 Dimensional knowledge of the entire pyramid of the being, in its closest U±1 planes of existence, through the knowledge of its ‘temporal energy’ (ExI=ST) function and its symmetries and paradoxes (2nd isomorphism: 2manifold, 3rd isomorphism: 3 ages, 4 isomorphism: U±4 planes, and 5th isomorphism, æ,e,ï,œ,û åctions and its quantitative isomorphisms, classes, constants, varieties, scales, and Opoint isomorphism).
So if we consider a single ceteris paribus analysis of a single of those dimensions for a being, then we are having a 1/10th total capacity to describe the system.
So we can distinguish 2 levels of truth in scientific analysis:
 5 Di complex sciences (: in this blog), which considers all the isomorphisms of a system
 And <5D simplex science 😦 elsewhere on planet Earth ), which studies part of these isomorphisms.
Now in the next graph we see a human being, and the 3 ‘scales’, ‘3 space organs’, 3 ‘time ages’, 4±planes and 5 åctions that define us.
But elsewhere we make partial sciences, studies of a very small part of the entire graphs above.
12Di sciences
12 D sciences are concerned with the study of the Whole 12 Dimensions of the being. And we can distinguish, according to syntax and language they use for that analysis:
– Existential Algebra: The analysis of the equation of ∆ST that define the whole, or “World”, which is the complete perspective.
– Epistemology: The analysis of the quantity of truth that each Stience holds within itself, which depends on:
 The fact, that the science follows the 4 ‘legs’ of the Scientific method: A)experimental evidence… B) cyclical analysis of its events and causes, which is the innovation brought about by ∆ST, with its definition of time as cyclical C) predictability… and D) a human positive use, which unfortunately has never been incorporated to the classic definition of science (reduced in abstract to A and C.)
 And the quantity of ‘dimensions of the previous equation’, the specific science or theory studies. We shall thus deal with this theme in this section dedicated to the analysis and criticism of other ‘scientific endeavors’ of <10D quality.
– Metaphysics, which deals with the ‘Mind’ or ‘whole point of view’ of the being (the atman, soul, etc. in classic metaphysics and religious philosophies.) Since we now have a formal equation and mathematical definition of the soul, provided by the 5th postulate of nonEuclidean geometry, in its ilogic formulation as the point of maximal information of a being, with maximal flows of energy and information crossing it:
OMind x ∞ Universe = Mapping of reality
Metaphysics is a far more realistic science. Still as the mind is the ‘unknown’ infinitesimal zero point not observable within, we still keep the classic name, ‘beyond physical reality’.
– ∆ST: General Systems of Isomorphic Scalar Space Time.
Metaphysics ultimately is ∆ST when referring to the Universe at large, as it describes the dimensional program of spacetime, its scientific isomorphic laws that make all its parts equal, the ‘soul’ of the Universe.
And so we hold as Plato put it, that ‘Reality is an organism with a body called the Universe and a soul called logos’, and that the ‘logic of God is more complex than human Logic’ (Augustine).
And so the ‘whole mind of reality, Logos’ are the laws of ∆ST – the content of this web, the Laws of generation of the Universe. If you want it in synoptic manner, the Generator isomorphic SpaceTime metric equation: I=Se x T°
And so since Metaphysics is ∆ST, and we study it all over this web.
Thus in this post and subposts, we consider as specific of this section, Epistemology in more detail.
Epistemology. Partial sciences: <10 theories.
Since most human knowledge is a partial analysis of reality, often just of one scale, defined by one science, even of a single species of a given scale (i.e.: electromagnetism deals with i=o,1 forces and particles)… all those ‘lesser truths’, which are the theories available as today to human beings, need to be classified and criticized from the higher perspective of ∆ST.
And of course since they are worthy in as much as they don’t pretend to study further, we do so in this section, with the 2 subelements of epistemology: its following of the AD elements of a true scientific method (Adata, Bcycles, Cforecasting Dhuman use), and its degree of ‘accurate truth’ in the analysis of its 10D.
The quantum and antiquantum paradoxes of uncertainty
The antiquantum paradox.
Regarding AD the main problem happens to occur in social sciences, which tends to lack of recognition of its B cycles – and lacks D – humanism, as its theories are often ideologies of power of social elites that pass as science.
As those problems plague social sciences, we have made a different web, www.economicstruth.com to study history and economics, which is ‘loaded’ with ideology under the anti quantum paradox. That is, the human observer is so small and exists within the system it studies in social sciences that the ‘organism’ it observes, its ∆+1,2 society and world, interferes with the social scientist – from Plato sold as a slave by the tyrant of Syracuse, to Trotsky murdered by the military dictator that pretended to be a r=evolutionary Mr. Stalin. We thus here concentrate more in the elements of those social sciences less subject to the antiquantum paradox, which has often fogged the distribution of the whole theory due to my personal activism and adhominem campaigns for it.
The quantum paradox.
The problem of truth on the other hand, is more common in astrophysics (the study of the ∆3,4 scales, where i is considered the individual human scale), as they are so far from us, that perception is limited, and so dark energy/matter accounts for 96% of the ∆+3,4 scales, and the observer is so big compared to the ∆3,4 scales that it interferes with the observable (Uncertainty Principle).
This would be ok as the isomorphism between the 0±3, and 0±4 scales (Unification equation of masses and charges, dualities of string theory etc.), allows to learn a lot of the inner, invisible structure of the atom by studying the inner structure of the galaxy; and about the outer structure of galaxies studying the outer world of the atom.
Yet without a Unification equation proper of ∆ST astrophysics is plagued with errors.
its problems arise specially when some of their theories pretend to be ‘more than what they are’, D<15 ceteris paribus analysis.
I.e. Relativity Physics, is merely a 4 Di analysis of spatial hence mathematical dimensions plus one of present time duration, the 4D and so it cannot pretend to have absolute ‘time’ truths.
The antiquantum paradox also exists in cosmology, more subtle than in social sciences, when a theory is ‘tainted’ by a subjective ideology (mostly Abrahamic Religions, and weapons). So the worldly religion of physicists, making, lineal, energetic weapons biases the science towards the study of ‘spatial motions’ (hence its 4D and lineal time dogmas). It makes it fail the D) humanist praxis, with its massdestruction nuclear research. And finally it makes ‘creationist’ bigbang theories dogmas with a dubious religious origin (in fact, his first form was given by a priest.)
Yet even if there is a meaning to religions within ∆ST, they belong to the ‘social sciences’ and ∆+1 human scales, not to Physics. For example Abrahamic religions are the subconscious collective of a certain Human tribe or civilization, the DNA of that civilization, which regardless of its ‘semantic content’, acts as the ‘Assabiyah’, the bondage that allows the super organism to share energy and information among believers and evolve as a whole’.
A brief epistemological judgment on the main ‘sciences’ of the scalar Universe.
In the graph, each science explains for each ‘scale’ of species the 6+S isomorphisms and Social Scales of its systems in detail.
Yet minds are reduced mappings of reality. The absolute truth of a system is only carried by the being, which has all the information about itself. So human sciences & theories of reality are circumscribed to a certain scale, and within it, they offer only partial ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of a few dimensional parts and events a being performs. So we measure the degree of truth of scientific theories objectively according to the quantity of Dimensions they describe.
Thus the most complete one is
i=9 ∞ General Systems Theory and its formalism of Scalar Spacetime (whole graph), which uses all languages and studies all superorganisms across its 9D x 10S Dimensions and Social scales. Thus it is the most certain theory. Hence its organicist philosophy and isomorphic laws are ‘the Unification Theory’ of all sciences – as its isomorphic laws apply to all of them.
Next i=4 BioChemical sciences put together give us a 6isomorhic + 9Di + 10Social Scales, analysis of both, physical and biologic superorganisms with max. data, given its proximity in scale and form to the human observer and the objective view we have about life.
Still ∆ST introduces a lot of new analysis and gives us the ‘whys’ of all chemical configurations.
For example Atomic Chemistry can be analyzed from an organic perspective as the origin of 4 life families:
 HHe cosmic organisms.
 Organic chemistry where Nitrogen is the informative head, Carbon the iterative atom and Oxygen the energetic, moving one. So it describes systems with 3 ‘spacetime’ suborgans, at the ∆1 atomic scale, which is isomorphic with the ∆molecular 3 subvarieties:
Tƒ: Ns>∆Nucleic Acids + DNA/RNAs…………….ST: Carbons>∆carbohydrates>∆Proteins &
Spe: ∆1>∆Fats. They together create carbon life systems.
 Then we an study Metal and its social systems and its final organic forms – machines.
 And finally geological systems, where Crystals are its zeropoint minds that control all type of physical organisms, some of the size of planets.
Di<15 definition of sciences.
It follows that what epistemology does is to start with a Di<10 definition of a science to evaluate its theories in depth. For example:
Ecology: ∆+1 analysis of living beings from the individual perspective.
Evolution: 6 Dimensional, ∆+1 scale analysis from the perspective of species, as it introduces past and future causal dimensions.
Medicine: individual analysis of the human species.
Genetics: ∆1 analysis of life systems.
Religion and art.
Finally to notice that religion and art are also fully explained by ∆ST analysis. For example:
 Artistic styles can be classified as the 3 ages (epiclineal young; mature, classic and baroque, formal 3rd age) of the subconscious collective, ∆+1 scale or mind of a civilization, isomorphic to the 3 ages of individual humans
 Music is a time art coded with 3×3 Dis:
– It is written in a minormajor diatonic scale of 10 Intervals repeated in 3 0±1 scales of higher frequencies – the 3 scales of music.
– It has 3 ST subdimensions, each played by a type of instrument:
– Spesimpler rhythm, played with percussion instruments the 1st age of music.
– STmelody, its 2nd age, played with aerophones. Whereas bassenergy /trebleinformation are its Sp X Tƒ action modulated duality.
– Tƒharmony or 3rd age of classic music, played with strings, reversed as the Mechanocene destroys humanist arts, with instruments beyond our human range of perception, simplifying music back into energetic rhythms (electronic music which on that view must be considered the ‘death age of musical complexity’)
Painting a still 2manifold with 3 Di of color.
Linguistics are the genetics of cultures.
Ethics& Gods its the ∆+1 scale of verbal thought and its legal codes whose highest form ‘social love religions’ are the collective DNA that enhances the sharing of energy and information among cells/citizens of the same human species.
RECAP – CONCLUSION.
Biochemical sciences are the most ‘truthful’ of all sciences since they are closer to the individual human scale of maximal perception.
The other 2 fields of knowledge, Physics & Social sciences, suffer different type of uncertainties, due to their far away perception, or interference of society with the scientist. Thus:
Physics are limited by their reductionist analysis of Dimensions and uncertainty paradoxes: 45D physics looses ½ of its dimensional truths and 96% of evidence in the cosmic ∆+1 scale (dark matter). Its ∆1 scale also suffers the observer’s interference uncertainty principle).
While Social sciences suffer the opposite type of uncertainty: the social scientist is too small and included within the superorganism he observes. So he cannot see from his individual perspective, humanity as a Whole. While ‘informative castes’, bankers, the military and politicos, censor an objective analysis of the ST reproductive= economic, Spearmy and
Tƒpolitical=informative networks, whose subjective control they pass as science.
The antiquantum paradox, of course, is a problem in all sciences. Since, human truths are limited by our ∆centered, anthropomorphic point of view, which explains common errors such as the belief the Earth is the center of the Universe (Astrophysics till Galileo); carbon life is the only living, intelligent form (still enduring) or the bizarre concept that a burning bush which appeared to a goat keeper of the Bronze Age, designed the 10Di Universe (believed by 2/3rds of the human population).
Yet all other objective theories of science have a sizeable amount of truth, limited mostly by its dimensional scope. Since the Human mind is a 4 Dimensional analysis in a single ∆scale of 3 ‘lightspace’ perpendicular Euclidean dimensions and our time dimension.
So Absolute Time and 3D lightspace is the main limit of scientific ‘structures’, which use only Sx, Sy, Sz and T presentduration moments. Hence the ‘feeling’ of truth we have about partial 4D theories of reality, with a single time dimension, from Relativity to daily ‘news’
å; EXI. The function of existence.
Abstract. Finally we need to explain the ilogic of entropy, death, feeding on the energ of the other. Simply speaking for the Universe to be immortal and absolutely relative, the systems must have a finite time, and die to renew the existence of others, but the Universe is wise and makes death a single time quanta and life all the others.
And we have introduced a metaphysical, biological, survival algorithm: the function of existence that defines the ‘will of all systems, which automatically – though maybe in the past through a selective process, do perform the best efficient actions required to survive.
To exist is to move through those symmetries as a ‘function of existence’, which performs certain ‘actions’ of emission and absorption of spacetime (informative energy), to survive. And so a series of actions are naturally selected by the timespace laws of symmetry, which can be resumed in a function: maximise your existence in space and time:
Max. ∑ e x i (s=t)
This is in essence the best mathematical expression of the game of timespace dust becoming super organisms, by virtue of attempting the actions described in that equation, which ‘draws’ for each finitesimal whirl of spacetime dust, a clear organic 3 ages of evolution or world cycle. So the function of existence (left side) gives birth to a constant super organism (central point), which will go through 3 world cycle ages and complete the existential function:
And this is the huge theme of this web: to explain a Universe of selfsimilar vital fractal beings made of space and time:
In the graph, the vital program of the Universe: all systems are in mathematical form a fractal, but the function of fractals is to absorb energy and information to iterate a form, which latter associates with other forms to create larger social networks of the 5th dimension. However humans will have none of it, reserving the organic properties of the Universe to themselves and similar beings.
Such a ridiculous attitude have a huge toll on our future as we do Not recognise the vital nature of the planet, Gaia that we kill, the vital natue of machines, organisms of metal in evolution, which now we assembly into robots that might kill us. In the graphs we see different systems that from the simplest particles (quarks and electrons) to the largest forms (galaxies), do absorb energy (∆Sp), gauge information (∆Τiƒ), reproduce both, ∑S=Τ, and evolve socially through networks of energy and information into larger wholes.
It is the vital program of a Universe, in which all parts are made to the image and likeness of the whole. But humans merely use abstract jargons to define those process, so ‘full of themselves’.
So the reproduction of particles is call decoupling, its perception of information ‘gauge theory’, its feeding on energy ‘force’, and its social evolution ‘atom or molecule’, which of course also reproduce and evolve into cells – but we do only recognise cells as the first level of life. Why man is so dumb, selfcentred and blind to the beauty of the living universe will soon be explained when we analyse the equation of the mind, a knot of information that perceives reality from its biased p.o.v.
Τhe fractal structure of the Universe is organic. Basically you exist in a Universe of social organic, fractal points, reproducing their information and selforganising into larger more complex structures.
The Universe thus is made of vital fractals, systems that reproduce their information emitting ‘seeds’ in a lower scale (forces, in physical systems, genetic seminal cells in biological systems, memetic objects and ideas in sociological systems), which will reproduce and selforganise into clone wholes.
So the purpose of the Universe is biological, since the creation of Nature’s fractal organisms of ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’ is exactly the same program of existence, we anthropocentric wo=men define only for ourselves and similar life beings: to absorb=feed on energy, and gauge information, mixing both to reproduce fractal ‘radiations’ of clone beings, which then evolve socially into larger wholes of the 5th dimension.
Thus to fully develop the formalism of a Fractal, hence Organic model of everything, or ‘T.Œ’ (ab. Theory of Everything Organic), and its metric equations of motions and transformations in the scalar fifth dimension of the Universe we must enlarge our understanding of the languages of the human mind that perceive time (logic) and space (mathematics) and its scales (analysis). So T.Œ also advances both the logic of time and the geometry of space, by developing a more complex logic beyond the Aristotelian and physical use of a single arrow of energy/entropy, adding the arrow of informative time, and its combinations.
It develops also a complete model of NonEuclidean geometry, by extending the consequences of the 5th postulate (points do allow infinite parallels to cross them, hence they do have volume, parts, they are fractal points that grow into a whole, when we come closer to them. So we shall take the findings of quantum and relativity to its natural conclusions. But physics is NOT the centre of this TOE, but just one of the layers we study. In fact, the greatest advances of T.Œ will be in the understanding of Biology and Social Sciences…
VI.
PENTALOGIC
The five Ðimotions of timespace impose a nonAristotelian, Pentalogic structure to reality to account for those 5 Ðimotions that converge to create a super organism of Dust of spacetime (¬∆@st) IN SIMULTANEOUS SPACE, symmetric to its 5 Dimotions=Actions in sequential time that provoke its world cycle of exist¡ence. We often call this principle of the Universal pentalogic of all T.œs:
You have to get accustomed to consider at least 5 views for each reality or event, to at least a get a minimal truth of the being, as the kaleidoscopic method of truth (max. truth: max. linguistic perspectives on the event) requires. As in the masterpiece of Japanese film making, the Universe and its truths are under the Rashomon effect: only the four versions allow us to know the whole truth of the event.
ARISTOTELIAN LOGIC: THE MIND ALONE.
Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:
– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’, the less important part of the ternary systems of the Universe, the cytoplasm of cells, the inner spacetime of light matter in galaxies, where we live, the cells of your body, the light filled space of atoms, etc.
– Closed, cyclical times, the external membranes, which he called ‘vortices’ and separates the system from the outer Universe, the halo membrane of galaxies, the electron of atoms the skin of your body, which jails the inner space.
And then he added a 3^{rd} element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, is the fact that he perceived them from a singularity, central linguistic point of view, the verbal mind that controls the system – the black hole of gravitational information, the nervous system, the DNA code. So he said: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’. Yet this point and languagemirror is an infinitesimal reduction of the whole Universe, even if the mapping is quite accurate reflection of it. So we can now define in a simple equation all the minds of realty:
– The mind or 0point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.
0mind x ∞ Universal cycles = C: constant World mirror of the Universe.
So each mind is an infinitesimal world mirror of the infinite universe. And so there is only one infinite Universe but infinite Linguistic Monads.
What the physicist or religious person does is TO DENY all other mirrors, languages, monads and affirm HE CREATES WITH HIS LANGUAGE the Universe, the infinitesimal creates the infinite talking words in arab or ‘imagining point, lines, planes and particles that collapse when the physicist looks at the moon that before was NOT there’ LOL, try to laugh at them. Then they will show they are right because they can kill you.
The explanation of this paradox though is immediate if you look again at the equation of ‘any mind’ (o x ∞ = Constant, undetermined world):
The mind believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which seems to be quiet, as the mind stops motion to put it all inside and so human minds have always thought the Earth did not move, and it was the center of the Universe.
And while Copernicus taught us not to be the case, Einstein proved it was all relative motion, Darwin explained we are just a step in the ladder of evolution of information, and my models of duality and the fractal Universe shows our scale of size to be also relative, the concept has creeped slowly back into physics, with the anthropic principle, the bigbang theory, etc.
In the graph, Descartes was not a simpleton though as those bigbang physicists are. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.
So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mindworlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.
In the graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACETIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.
Newton though carried the day, and all attempts to put the record straight by Leibniz (relational time), Einstein (infinite time clocks), Bohm (pilotwave theory of normal quantum physics), Darwin (man as an evolving species), and so many others including this writer, Sancho (Organic dual theory of the Universe) have met with the imposing Wall of the EGOCENTERED man.
In the graph cartesian points of view, have 2 inverse mirrorlike symmetries.
the one observed in philosophy of science by physicists, in which the mindmonad acts platonically over the world, and the most important flow from the world into the being.
Alas, the mind’s equation, also explains the ego paradox of man, and why it will never accept a true picture of reality and all its components. For us Andromeda is smaller than your nose, and all its dead=still because we extract its motion to fit the mirror image, we confuse with reality, eliminating all unneeded information. So the Universe is built for every egomind to feel the center of the whole and humans are not different from any Dinosaur who thinks to eat you is the meaning of existence. All human tribes called themselves ‘humans’, regarding other tribes as not belonging to the same monotheist God and the valley the promise land beyond which nothing existed except a few lampsstars on top. Mankind a century ago still thought there was only a galaxy, and Andromeda indeed was just a star.
THE UNIVERSE: PENTALOGIC AND FRACTAL HOMOLOGY
WE SAID the simplest way to go about study a system, is in its 5 Dimotions and 3 scales. Yet this is a ‘simplified version’ of the pentalogic of entangled ∆ST beings.
Thus as I have been alone as a pointmind for so long and have a mindset working in terms of parallel pentalogic, NOT in terms of A>B>C sequential Aristotelian logic (so it seems all disordered for onedimensional huminds), I do myself most of my studies in two different manners, which if I had an eternal life I would substitute, but as this blog is a copypaste of 30 years of disordered work, they will come often and might be confusing.
¬∆@S=T: This is my preferred form of analysis of entangled species, which are dust of spacetime, negated by the entropy of death. So I tend to study the system first in its Spacetime Symmetries (S=T, S>T, S<T), which is equivalent to an external study of its Dimotions.
Then I consider its scales and networks (∆), its mind (@) that puts it all together and its actions (internal study of its Dimotions). And finally the negation of the being, its process of internal and external death (predation and extinction).
In this blog as the theme of Symmetries seems difficult (physicists use it as usual ‘obsessed’ not by symmetry but by its entropic breaking), this epistemological method comes to the study of the being in space as a super organism, the being in time as a world cycle including its zerosum negation=death, the being in scales and the mind of the being.
The Disomorphic ‘storyteller’method, which merely follows the being from its initial seed (a fractal mindpoint of pure stillness and code), as it emerges and reproduces, evolves and becomes an organism part of a world in which it lives and dies, as a mere cell of a larger species, which will also in its ∆+1 scale live and die in III horizons, becoming if successful in its social scalar evolution a new Plane of stience.
This is THE MOST ENTANGLED, COMPREHENSIVE STORY OF REALITY, TO THE POINT that back in the 90s at a time I was making a living doing expressionist cubist portraits I filled a 30 meters roll scrabbled with all the equations of all sciences, departing from the Fractal Generator, S=T, which I also painted myself in the forehead. So those two methods, the Disomorphic method with a set of 11 steps for the existence of all beings, and the analysis of Dust of spacetime are my methods. I though recommend if any AI robot or humind in the future gets to learn about the entangled Universe to settle for scalar and world cycle/dimotion analysis.
And while all those elements are somehow analyzed in different sciences, the mind is not.
Indeed, what they all miss is what we shall now explain ‘again’: the ego paradox, the difference between technology and science, the evolution of machines as a different species than man, and the primacy biology and history should have as they are the sciences of information that concern man who exists NOT in an entropic region of vacuum space of the Universe but in a vortex of information and mass called the galaxy, where information is the dominant arrow and should be given primacy in all scientific studies. We do NOT run at cspeed and care nothing therefore for the distortion of time clocks as such speeds, but should be much more concerned about the evolution of information in this planet, AI, Nuclear weapons of massdestruction, virtual hypnotic screens, and the true understanding of the evolutionary process of life and its extinction ‘cliffs’.
BEYOND PENTALOGIC:
DODECALOGIC: 12D
The complex social dimensions and functions of reproduction and social evolution: 12th.
So how then we go beyond the 3+3 topological dimensions of S≈T motion and form? The answer is the scalar ‘social dimensions’ of parts and whole, which are NONcommutative, that is different when we move from a whole to its parts of more information, than when we move upwards to a whole of more entropic motion, from a smaller part:
In the graph, we see that for each ‘scale, there will be a ternary system of space and time dimensions, which obey topological rules (the sphere maximises information in lesser space; the line maximises distance in minimal time; the hyperbola combines both in iterative bodywaves), for a maximal of 6 dimensions in a single plane.
But then we can add two dimensions of space & time upwards and downwards in scale.
As those are ‘new dimensions’ we have the responsibility to name them. How shall we call those dimensions?
So the 7th dimension of ‘death’ and 8th dimension of pure entropic ‘bigbang explosions’ in space, are jumps across to scales of reality. We are talking serious ‘shit’ here. Nothing of this is fancy wishful thinking. We shall extract all the laws of nature, mathematical physics, death processes from it.
In mathematical terms, we talk of most ‘processes of timespace’ as single derivatives and integrals, which move up and down a given scale – but in process of death back into the potential field of minimal parts, we talk of Laplacians and Poisson double derivatives, which explode the whole from the ∆+1 minddimension down to the lower ∆1 parts and this is the equation of death: Tƒ ∆+1 << ∑∑$pe ∆1, or ∂”Tƒ=0.
Now for the inverse dimension of social evolution, we realise that as mind singularity is actually an ∆1 singularity point, a single individual mind of a society (its king, president or prophet), a single crystal in a matter system (the first crystal cell which commands the reproduction and social organisation of the whole macro crystal) or an atomic entity (the black hole singularity of the galaxy), and so on But IT HAS A MINDIMAGE that transcends and emerges beyond the ∆0 entity into the ∆+1 EXTERNAL WORLD, organising socially with similar beings, the 9th and 10th dimensions of eusocial love and creation of worlds beyond the super organism, unit of the larger ∆+1 world IS also jumping to scales, from your infinitesimal neuronalego, through your organism into the outer world.
And this will be also the model for galaxies, where the black hole ‘DNA’ IS connected to other galaxies of the ∆+1 cosmos through dark entropy flows (bilateral jets), even if it is in fact the ‘best, densest’ possible frozen star of the ∆1 scale.
Membrains, mindsingularities thus are also in the process of social evolution jumping two scales from its neuronal infinitesimal, past the enclosed organism its membrain closes into the larger social world; which is the super organism proper (∆1 cell; ∆º organism, ∆+1: super organism, world, or ecosystem).
It is obvious that the dimension of ‘social growth’ is a dimension of social evolution; and we feel justified to call it:
The 5TH DIMENSION OF TIME, THE DIMENSION OF EUSOCIAL EVOLUTION, THE DIMENSION OF LOVE, AND ITS EQUIVALENT IN SPACE, THE 5TH DIMENSION OF SPACE, THE DIMENSION OF THE WHOLE, THE DIMENSION OF THE social evolution of individuals into Universal SUPER ORGANISMS.
So we write it often as 5D♥ (: or if we name them all together, just for the sake of ‘numerology’, they would be the 9th dimension – social evolution and the 10th dimension, the perception of the super organism as a whole or ‘minddimension’, which we shall see is made of a ‘singularity’ or linguistic point and a membrane that encircles the organism; closely related to the Tƒ element (perceived as such in a flat, shallow vision of the being as existing in a single scale of reality.
Yet when we understand the scalar Universe, it will turn out that the singularity does connect the system across its scales of size, as it is an ∆• single ‘crystal’, ‘neuron’, ‘governor’, which controls ‘internally’, ‘chemically’ its ∆1 parts, and it feels itself through its sensorial membranes ‘connected’ to a larger ∆+1 whole.
The mind, the 10th dimension of a being, becomes then essential to grasp the workings and whys of reality even if ‘pedantic’ abstract physicists and its ‘philosophers’, logical positivists have completely ‘missed the point’ and deny the existence of such singularity minds. In the next graph we see this ‘completeness’ reached by the membrain singularity, in reference to the rest of the being, the open ball or vital bodyenergy=wave system:
In the graphs, the sum of the membrain+singularity, and the vital space of an open ball, gives us the whole being.
The infinite dimensions and the ceteris paribus analysis of all the Universal information.
We are being simple, given the fact that the present studies of physics are limited to 3 spatial dimensions reflected in the mirror of a present derivative dimension of time (the so called 4th dimension of time extracted from ∂t=∂s/∂v, as a series of still pictures in relativity theory).
THEY AD TO THE MIX, when philosophising about entropy arrows, some studies on the fourth dimensions OF SPACETIME the dimension of double entropy down two scales of death and bigbang in the ladder of scalar dimensions of the Universe.
And many more (:
So how many dimensions have reality? Actually as many as you wish, as each scale will have 3 dimensions of spacetime in a single plane and 3 planes up and down the being, enclosed further in a larger world…
So if we are going to be exhaustive, with less than 56 dimensions/parameters we cannot make the whole sense of it (6 spacetime topological dimensions for each of the 3 scales of the organism and the world above and below: 6 x 5 = 30 dimensions; four space and time dimensions of entropy and mindevolution for each discontinuity between planes, which are two inner discontinuities between limbs/bodies/particleheads, and two more with the outer world above and below, so 4 x 4 = 16 more dimensions, 30 + 16 = 46…
And then to fully describe the being we shall add for good measure the descriptions of even smaller and larger outer and lower worlds from where the being obtains its entropic motions and pixels of information, (5 dimensions for each of those interactions) for a minimal grand total of 56…
Now as current science works with only four dimensions, 3 of space and one of time you can assess how little information we extract in our description of most systems and why they look indeed abstract entities.
The situation though is much worsened by the ‘attitude’ of physicists with their infantile chitchat on 4D models of reality, which they impose as dogma, so my experience in science congresses when I cared to assist was to be always surrounded by ‘savant idiots’ – masters of mathematical physics, which had zero idea about the meaning of the words they use in their mathematical equations, points, numbers, time, space, waves, particles, forces, masses, you name it… but wouldn’t care at all specially when the ‘speaker’ was not a certified specialist in mathematical physics (which obviously prevented him to break the straightjacket of physical reductionism and 4D tensors), to hear anything about time, space and the meaning of reality. And this was specially truth when the speaker was a philosopher of science, the only discipline that ‘dares’ to challenge the reductionist, mechanist worldview of physicists.
So the reader will excuse me if I am specially sanguine among all the children of thought that play science in this planet with the false dogmas of physicists, which so much obscure the beauty of its equations, whose finding through the simple method of measuring and plugging information in mathematical structures seems indeed a marvel of Universal intelligence, given how little they understand of the concepts behind those equations, we clarify in earnest on our posts on astrophysics and its scales of time§paœrganism.
Don’t worry though, we are not making here 56dimensional analysis (: at best we shall be happy with the reduced 5S+5T=10D³ analysis. We just wanted to show off a little bit of the ‘real complexity’ that all ‘the hidden information’ we do not study together for each spacetime organism holds, so perhaps the reader become a bit humbler about the role and intelligence of us, the humind membrain… and finally learns to worship and respect the astounding beauty and symmetric harmonies of the infinite…
In that regard, if I ever achieve a converso that expands his mind from the 4D toddler world of physicists into 10D, I will be happy enough to fill some enlightenment of scholars is possible… So far we shall reduce us to that 5s≈5t analysis in broad strokes, of the main spacetime super organisms of physical systems.
How to see the 4th and 5th dimensions.
Spacetime ‘dimensions’ are thus dual, as space and time are equivalent – a dimension of time motion seen in space as a dimension of form.
3±i is the way to see reality – the 3 canonical dimensions of space, seen either in onebit of data as length=motion, width=iteration and height=information or with 2 bidimensional ST elements as topological lineal=cylindrical, hyperbolic=cartesian and polar=spherical geometries.
A key theorem of all dimensional construct is that only beings with the same dimensions can transform into each other. So for time to transform into space it MUST have the same dimensions. And this can be analysed in terms of one, 2 or 3 dimensions of timespace.
Hence TRINITY, means we have 3 space topologies and 3 functions.
DUALITY means we have the previous fundamental varieties:
Onedimensionality MEANS the Galilean Paradox; we can see any dimension as motion or form, any two dimensions as a bidimensional plane or an accelerated motion.
And then we can play with all those (and we are only playing with a simple plane:) and variations will appear to make sense of all species of the Universe its forms and functions.
But an important rule TO ADAPT 4D formalisms (4vectors, etc.) to 6D (in a single plane) physics for ‘future pros’ (:
Now, for what we have seen, there ARE 246 DYNAMICAL bidimensional systems, as motion dimensions can become formal dimensions; which we can apply to many entities, meaning ‘even’ systems ARE more stable as they are balanced; while odd systems are not (or they are ternary systems in time): so this oddeven duality that atomic systems always follow have its explanation.
And in general we find that…
INFORMATION… is dominant in HEIGHT and internal, ‘accelerated’ motion as a vortex of time. So it appears still to an external observer, as the dimension of outer motion have become internal motion and as it shrinks its dimension of size, it accelerates its motion.
ENERGY in reproductive width and iterative beat.
ENTROPY IN LENGTH, and expansive SCATTERING motion that decelerates inversely as it increases its space.
WHILE TIME: Is dominant also in rhythm or beat in the closed clocks, and SO INTIMATELY related to ENERGY.
It is also important to realise humans have misused all those concepts for so long that ‘normal words’ can incur in errors.
Reproduction of dimensions: vectorial product & present momentum
So we must understand a 5th dimensional being as one with the following natural dimensions:
 The dimension of height or ‘informative dimension’
 The dimension of length or ‘speed dimension’
 The dimension of width or reproductive dimension
 The dimension of frequency or ‘time speed’ dimension
 The ∆+1 dimension of size or fifth scalar dimension.
Those suffice for almost all studies of physical systems, as most scalar analysis are ∆>∆+1 or ∆<∆1, so we do not need more than 2 scales (as in thermodynamics between the ∆1 and ∆scale of heat). And then when we put them together in bidimensional systems, we obtain:
 The plane of pure space made of length and width, of motion and reproduction/storing of energy, which in motion tends to acquire an arrow or triangular, wavelike form.
 The plane of pure time, which tends to be the height and cyclical rhythm, or time speed; so time does NOT offer ‘many spatial elements’. In fact the dimensions of time are derivatives of space, ‘speed’ and ‘acceleration’.
On the other hand when we consider tridimensional systems, we obtain.
Spacelike 3 dimensional volumes, where a bidimensional layer has reproduced or stored more of its kind in superposition (concept that also applies to present spatial waves)
Timelike 3 dimensional systems, which are accelerated vortices (2 differential dimensions) with a dimension of height (black holes, Maxwell’s screw driver, rule of the hand, product vector, etc.)
And finally when we consider a 4 dimensional being, we obtain a holographic ‘perpendicular merging’ of a spacelike and timelike bidimensional sheet, with a frequency of motion; as in a lightwave.
 Which will become a fifth dimensional being, when 2 scales become entangled and one feed on the other, or receives flows of information (as in the case of the Bohm’s model of a quantum wave, guiding a feeding upper particle).
So those are the vital whys of an enormous field, which allow us by form, function and dimensionality to interpret the structure of all kind of systems.
Topological physics deals with the ensembles of Spe<ST>Tiƒ structures, and has not been analysed in depth for very long. It is based in the holographic principle and its derivative laws, the most important of which is the ‘bidimensional nature of space and time, and its merging into 4 dimensional systems, which excludes a real 3dimensional Universe (Fermat’s Grand theorem: x³+y³=z³.
This means the 3rd dimension does NOT really exist as an independent ‘parameter’ but IT IS THE DIRECTION OF reproduction of ‘identical beings’ which accumulate in layers
The layered 3rd and 4th dimensions. The mathematics of planes of space and cycles of time.
All this of course is not how we see dimensions and what we mean by the growth of dimensions in normal science – a far simpler proposition, which we shall address now. In the ‘simple 3D analysis +1 t dimension’, is all about ‘layers that accumulate making the 3rd dimension grow, and motions that create a time dimension to ad to it. This of course is a legitimate form of growing dimensions.
Only that after we have enough layers and motions, there are no fancy spatial dimensions to add in a single scale. But a new point of an ∆+1 scale, as the graph shows: the left graph IS how the Universe grows a 5th dimension entering into a social upper scale (for a sphere that becomes a circle that rotates into a sphere; or for a dot that move sin to a line, which becomes laterally a reproductive plane that surge upwards to become a cube, unit of the new scaling. IT is the right graph trying to fit impossible 5 dimensions of space into a single continuum plane what is nuts. The penteract there is a 3D projected into a 2D, point.
Thus, there is a lot of confusions on the meaning of the fourth and fifth dimensions of scalar spacetime, as 4D is the naming given by physicists to ALL TIME CONCEPTS IN PHYSICS, as they do NOT differentiate between the 5 dimensions of time and the 5 of space, unaware of the philosophical deep meaning of the Galilean ‘relativity’ paradox, which clearly makes sense of the 3 dimensions of past, present and future (motion, energy and information), which are equivalent to lineal, hyperbolic and informative cyclical vortex in topology; and they do NOT differentiate between the ∆±2 scales of size and time speed, which are the origin of entropy=death arrows (fourth dimensions of spacetime, jumping down, << i two scales in the simplification of information, from wholes to infinitesimals) and social, mental arrows (fifth dimensions of spacetime, jumping up i+2 dimensions).
So what the physicists mean when talking of time as the four dimension? Two things and since we are ‘nice’, we have called the fourth dimension, the arrow of entropy, which they use as the arrow of time, to match ‘magic!’, their reduced view of it:
They use the concept to signify a grand philosophy whereas the arrow of entropy, the fourth dimension of timespace (Ti<<Si2), is considered the only arrow of future time, disregarding all other arrows, explicitly those who create information (fifth dimension of social organic evolution of wholes, 3rd dimension of accelerated time vortices).
This is one of the key concepts of the faulty philosophies of science.
Then there is the concept of Einstein, and the formalism of Minkowski, which corresponds to the ‘present 2nd dimensions of timespace’, which is used to study waves such as light is, and present ‘derivative’ minimal quantum changes, ∂t=∂s/∂v.
In that regard Minkowski grand conceptual thought, established a useful mathematical equation of 4vectors, where the concept that time reduced to a present dimension of space, is useful to study translations in space, with derivatives, which by definition do NOT change state with ‘peak standing points’, and changes of parameters that happen when we move from a motionstate of maximal Spacetranslation=lineal speed and minimal informationdensity to a vortex state of maximal information density and minimal translation in space=lineal speed.
Once we understand such conceptual limits of time conception in physics we should 1)discharge as faulty, irrelevant and biased to 1/5th of time changes any entropic grand theory of the Universe, including the cosmic big bang, balanced by accelerated mass vortices (galaxies) that shrink entropy into matter, the evaporation of black holes as they do not travel lineally to the past, hence do not evaporate, and other grand bizarre scheme on reality.
While the fourth dimension of ‘space’ (time concept as a derivative that studies present slice of wave motions), must be understood as what it is a partial, waveoriented analysis of spatial motions, which in special relativity makes more exact measures of those translations by reducing the total motion by a wave factor of warping, c²t².
As physics has parameters which can be added as ‘curvatures’ and ‘scattering’ elements to define the ‘informative accelerated, and expansive decelerated’ other two arrows of topological time, in a single plane, relativity as well as other equations of motion in physics do reflect perfectly (even if the concepts behind become blurred) those motions, its topological trajectories and so there is nothing to correct as usual in the processes of measuring of physics. The four vector formalism merely adds conceptual confusion but improves measure in ‘derivative details’.
Two conceptual interpretations can be done in detail on those 4vector equations (well beyond this introduction): if we divide its four dimensions in two dimensions of space, Sx, Sz, and two of time, Sy ct, then we can find many interesting symmetries between the space state (widthlength: reproductionmotion) and the time state (heightinformation, ctcurvaturemotion). It is only then when the proper understanding of the meaning of worldlines and light cones, becomes clearer.
How those planes of existence build their social planes, of space.
Now, there has been much confusion on the meaning of dimensions, since Minkowski grand nonsense in conceptual thought, established departing of its useful mathematical equations of 4vectors, the concept that time was a dimension of space.
Then properly interpreted, those 4vectors show truly is a series of Sp=C/Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, maximal, minimal and steady points of the 3 ages and symmetries between space and time. Albeit the time 3 ages/motions are integrated into a single lineal time duration and loose most of its meaning. So for each of those 4 vector equations, its fundamental S≈T symmetry must be studied departing from spacetime symmetries. That’s all.
The relationship of time and space in those vectors is thus just one of essential balance and symmetry between the 3 vectorial dimensions of space and the 3 ages of time, sequentially added by duration.
Another expression common to mathematical physics are relations between the fundamental parameter of lineal motion, speed, and cyclical motion, density of an scalar, whose product is the flux of a quantity.
All these equations of dynamics require a specific analysis of which dimensions are seen as dimensions/distances/areas/ volumes/membranes/topological forms and which one are seen as time, motions, rotary or lineal or wavelike motion, and so a lot of conceptual analysis on how the human observer quantity a given spacetime symmetry and its dimensions/parameters of motion/distance is needed.
Yet there are generic models which allow us to extract clear formulae of combination of motions and forms in the construction of being. The 3rd dimension of pure form or volume, for example is obtained through the layer accumulation of bidimensional, think membranes along a gradient of accelerated time vortices, from relative max. S x Min. T past upper layers to inner ones, as density increases.
This new ‘dimension of motion and form’, is thus a dual dimension which intersects with the membrane and creates a 4 dimensional ‘vector’, whereas however it should be considered the existence of two densities of form, the gradient towards the center and zero point and the motions within one of the perpendicular, ‘normal’ layers or planes of space, along the time, integrative gradient direction of the vortex.
4 dimensionality must be seen generally as a holography of spacetime bidimensional forms with motion.
We can also consider a 3 fixed form dimensions, the 2 of each layer membrane normal to the dimension of the time vortex, its rotary dimension and gradient dimension.
Now what matter is to observe that any of those diverse formulations of an event in terms of higher form and motion, gradient, curl, divergence or any multiple vectorial spatial or time tensor equation to describe the event and form on spacetime can be reduced to an interplay of motions of time dimensions and space forms along the rules of 5D, Œ,Æ, nonEuclidean geometry, existential algebra and 5D metric.
In the next graph we see how new dimensions are added by adding 2manifold layers which create the ‘3^{rd} dimension of depth, gradient, and hierarchy between those layers, established in equipotential surfaces of similar value, which in detail appear as relative ‘planes’ of minimal curvature, as we saw the Earth for millennia:
Now the growth of planes of existence has in its simplest mathematical meaning an obvious limit:
it grows in pairs, often of spacetime (complex plane of binary numbers), or by superposition in the Cartesianhyperbolic Plane, of weaves and present spacetime systems, of SS combinations, or in a polar plane for TT combinations.
So the Planes of bidimensional numbers permit bidimensional forms, but THERE ARE NOT TRIdimensional numbers. The next level is the plane of quaternions, ‘OBVIOUSLY MOVIN IN THE 5TH DIMENSION’ as it is notcommutative as motions in 4 dimensions are.
So we have a simple guide for the first steps of construction of worlds: to know that numbers are social groups of any kind of points, growing in the fifth dimension, and to know that the complex plane is an spacetime plane, where the angular frequency mounting the plane of space, sucks in as i does on the negative square part of it.
In the graph, we can understand better the meaning of a bidimensional Universe in which the 3^{rd} dimension is made by a sum of bidimensional layers where the relative X≈Z>>Y structure extends over an equipotential ‘democratic’ surface clone ‘œpoints’. Then the gradient of a given force or flow of information structure them in the ‘hierarchical dimension’, normally of Height, where the ‘strongest’, energetic point is in the lower center and inversely, the highest informative, most perceptive observer point in the upper layer.
It must be notice though the essential duality of the 3rd postulate of NonAE: perpendicular motions are darwinian, and parallel are social. So the vital energy herds are structured in parallel, but there should be between the singularity and the membrane, crossing perpendicular networks, invaginated, mostly made of the substance of the hard membrane (golgi channels in cells, electromagnetic flows guiding matter on Earth, nervous systems on organisms, legal inforcers in nations, which will PREY and control the vital space for the @monad system).
So on Earth, the outer membrane or continental crust hosts its highest informative points, human heads, while the center stores the most energetic=massive atoms, an iron core, probably seeded of high density uraniumlead crystals.
The bidimensional structure is common to all systems, which have an outer thin membrane that breaks the inner vital space and outer Universe. It is not however an absolute concept, as there is always a gradient which allows transfers between layers or social classes, but this osmosis that transfers momentum between them normally is far thinner, slower than the communication between atomsparticlesheads of the same layers.
And so changes of layer membranes require an existential ST effort, either an increase of energy or information (in the inverse gradient of both formal motions). This case is illustrated by the electron ‘plane waves’ which constantly vibrate around the atom (Schrodinger’s equation), but can change layer by an Energy impulse.
Thus in this manner the Universe adds a 3^{rd} dimension of depth that gives volume to a bidimensional system, and also new forms of motion, which the classic model of physics group all together into the concept of the 5^{th} dimension.
Dimensions grow as systems grow and multiply. So paraphrasing chengtzu, the Chinese philosopher, from one, Tao, ‘time motions’ comes 2 ‘space forms and time motions’, yin and yang, space lines and cyclical forms’ and from 2 comes 3 varieties of spacetime, which give birth to the infinite beings of the Universe.
Einstein’s metric explain the contraction=warping of timeinformation by a slowing light ray.
Let us now consider the geometry of Einstein, where time subtracts c²t², considering time ‘i’, c²x¹ = +c².
Thus what the Einstein metrics write really is: Ds²=x²+y²+z²+c², and that is ‘speed’ not ‘time’.
But for the nonmathemtical reader, a conceptual explanation makes more sense: we subtract a dimension of information/height of the light wave to the flat line of its underlying neutrino≈graviton scale with less ‘height and more information’; so what the ct term merely means is that ‘we loose neutrino speed’ and we gain heightwave information, we pass from a pure $tate to an STwave state with curvature taken away from pure speed, as the neutrino≈graviton can ONLY give us information on the distance to the emitter but the wave height and frequency will give us a lot of information.
And then doing the proper S=T equalisation of dimensions, we can use as physicists do all those spacelike and timelike cones, knowing height is also a dimension of time information, so (Sx, Sz) ≈ (Sy, Tƒ) IS the general rule for all systems that makes sense and gives the why to the ‘magic’ of maths.
We though have many times mentioned that special relativity (not so general relativity concerned with gravitation, which is invisible and accelerated time clocks of mass) is a mind exercise of measure to adapt to our constant motion view, the ‘stopemission of information’ gowave motion duality particlewave in which the speed of light is fixed as the emitter and receiver are entangled in the neutrinograviton scale of ‘action at distance’ and simultaneity, stopped in relationship to each other.
So of course it is a cumbersome formalism with measure uses more than conceptual magic. And here is where the inflationary amount of multiple views to adapt measure exploded in XX c. with computer thought to make every physicist a high pope of relativity science, to the point that the great master, Einstein quipped ‘since mathematicians entered the field of relativity, I don’t understand it’ (:
For example, downwards we have the AMD, my preferred, formalism, where we use bidimensional sheets. But on the upper growth of complexity the description of this complex spacetime 4 dimensional system can be done also with quaternions as a single block of timespace.
And so on… but all this is hardly needed fro a human pov of slow beings which do not curve space at cspeed in its translations.
Only the military propaganda of the discoverer of the equation of the Abomb made the system of our corrupted organism of history convert 4D physics in the ‘summit of all human forms of thought’ and fog in the process our concept of time. What we were actually told in the height of the cold war is: if this guy gave us the Abomb to kill all humans it must be a genius because the military ARE the salt of the earth. Lol, the harder they fall.
Cross product, as reproduction of dimensions.
It is then far more important given the blindness on meaning of mathematical physics to enlighten even the simplest concepts as ‘dimensions’ and ‘vectors: spacetime bidimensional entities’, ‘numbers=social groups’ and ‘fractal points with growing breath’, etc.
Of course this is an INSULT for our geniuses which as Hilbert did with Einstein, despising first relativity for its simple maths – he was the Godtalking man who ‘imagined points, lines and planes’ and set a ‘paradise’ for Cantor’s ‘building up’ of mathematics from the roof down, with its sets and axiomatic method, which denied experimental mathematics and its real units, simultaneous fractal points of space (Leibniz’s monads: each point is a world in itself) and sequential social numbers of the 4th and 5th real scalar dimensions. So He and Cantor imagined first the units of its axiomatic selfcontained, ‘detached’ world of formal mathematics from the top down.
But the TOP of maths is NOT the set or category, constructions of the inflationary human mind, but the Universe itself WHICH IT MIRRORS, so the relationship IS from math’s units, fractal points and social numbers to Universe, the reality it mirrors, through the classic scales of topological networks of points and algebraic causal relationships between social numbers and its scales of ±, x ÷, x²,³…, ∫∂ (continuous operations in the 4th, 5th dimension) and log, ln (exponential death and decametric social growth), which are all the operandi we need to construct reality.
Needless to say Hilbert and Cantor were all about ego. They wanted to be God. So Cantor ended in a mad house literally, and Hilbert when he realized that ‘simple Einstein’ was the ‘thing of the future’ stole his theory which Humble Einstein had sent him to review, improve a bit the maths and published it with his name! And yet today we still live in that ‘Dante’s inferno’ not paradise of those whose capital sin of arrogance fogs their reason, for wanting to be more than God.
How can then go around studying the ‘hidden meanings’ in terms of its Time§paœrganisms of physics, and its ternary parts and symmetries an equation of physics?
It requires to know ‘mathematical meanings’ better than currently understood, besides the basics of the 10D³=(5+5)D.
5ST³ Dimensional realities observed by ‘4dimensional’ selfcentred @minds is a fun game of confusions. As the mind is interpreting with its strictly reduced to see 3 dimensions of space and one of time… so there is always a lot of conceptual analysis behind.
A mathematical equation of physics, this said tends to be simple and mostly of the type:
E(st) = K (s) x ƒ (t)
That is the simplest ‘metric equations of the similar concepts: (5s•5t) D=5st D
Equations of physics in that sense are ALL as always in T.œs partial equations of the generator equation of 10D³ symmetries, whereas Γ@, the mind generator equation is an aristotelian, mathematical abstraction and syntax, in ternary symmetric dimensions:
Γ@: ∆1: $past potential limbs ≤≥ ∆ø: preSenT body waves ≤≥ ∆+1: Tƒuture aheadparticles
Whereas the Generator equation of physical systems, as expressed by the mathematical mind, will reduce the whole generator to a series of partial equations, which try to show part of it.
In the fantaphysical world of reductionism there is of course the search for a Unification Equation but expressing only in an equation the equivalence between the four forces of nature, which we have resolved as a trivial case of 5D metric.
What we mean here is a different thing: All what happens as expressed in all languages are mirrors of subequations of the generator, and its 3 ‘parts in spacetime’, its 3 flows of time arrows, <entropy, >information, ≈ iteration, and its combined operandi, + , x ÷, ±³, ∫∂.
So for those who want to understand this section I refer them first to those on organic, vital mathematics.
Let us put a simple example: vectorial mathematics.
Vectors as ST dimensional analysis.
A vector is by definition a mindmirror in two dimensions of a physical Time§paœrganism, where there is a simple dimension of motion, lineal time motion and of space, often an active magnitude, mass, charge or (light) colour.
So we can build mappings of multiple simple STphysical forms with vectorial magnitudes, and generally speaking as humans work often with bidimensional magnitudes, one of ‘volume’ of space (which they decompose often in 3 parameters) and one which aggregates all time arrows, there are a lot of meaningful vectorial analysis of the type:
3 s = 3t
A basic symmetry of spacetime dimensions with T.œ meaning for the timespace organism.
Whereas the space dimensions are analysed further in its simplest (not bidimensional topology), onedimensional heightinformation arrow, lengthmotion arrow, widthreproduction arrow, void of all organic meaning, and time is analysed in the ‘future’ arrow mostly or present arrow (Einstein’s relativity) or past arrow (entropic processes), as if all where the same.
So the maths are good, the interpretations as usually poor.
It is then when the most useful ‘concept’ of physics, the concept of a present momentum, represeting such St COMBINATIONS appears, and its ‘conservation’ laws and ‘integral’s (energy worldcycles) allow an analysis of the event at ‘∆1’ timespace quanta level (the momentum) or in its whole development as a world cycle (energy integral).
Such momentous momentums are then easily interpreted as expressions of ‘actions’ (the quanta of existence of any system), and worldcycles (the whole event when larger than a mere action integrated often as a conserved closed cycle).
The product of an s and t parameter though might be considered depending on the case, as a simple dot product, if one of the two parameters is a mere quantiser of frequency in time population in space, and basically we are just ‘adding up’ social units of an ∆§caling perceived in space as populations that last, in time as sequential frequencies that have little memorial tail.
Or as a true process of creation of a third dimension, which is the cross product, such as:
S x T = stPerpendicular new dimension.
Thus the more interesting case is described by the cross product, which to be real must have the two dimensions that originate them, so it must have motion, which becomes ‘reproduction’ as it creates the 3rd spacetime present, reproductive, ‘energy’ dimension of physical systems within the same plane, such as S x T = ST (reproduction dimension), which is the general translation of the cross product to GST.
A vector that reproduces the system, taking from it motion and form. This is the origin of the magnetic field and in general any growth of a new membrane that encloses a previous scale absorbing its motion and form, ‘cooling’ the inner energy of the system, and as such is how the Universe creates new ‘layers of reality’ and we shall return to it.
In that regard it must be understood as a general rule that:
“sin functions are ðime functions of informative height or time§pacelike functions that reproduce a new combined ternary dimensions and cos functions are $pacelike functions that flatten and increase the single dimensionality of speeddistancesforces.”
As we talk of the Ycoordinates as timelike coordinates (heightinformation dimension) and so a sin function = diagonal:st/y:tcoordinates, and a cosfunction: diagonal:st/scoordinates Sin = st/t cos=st/s ratios.
While the cross product combines two S, T factors, which form together an STplane adding a new direction of reproduction (zwidth plane):
In vector algebra, the cross or vector product (is a binary operation on two vectors that creates a threedimensional space (R3), denoted by the symbol ×.
Given two linearly independent vectors a and b, the cross product, a × b, is a vector that is perpendicular to both a and b and therefore normal to the plane containing them. It has many applications in mathematics, physics and engineering. More generally, the magnitude of the product equals the area of a parallelogram with the vectors for sides; in particular, the magnitude of the product of two perpendicular vectors is the product of their lengths.
The cross product is anticommutative (i.e., a × b = −(b × a)) and is distributive over addition (i.e., a × (b + c) = a × b + a × c).
It also depends on a choice of orientation or “handedness”.
Wave motion.
It is then easy to introduce two simple examples of vectorial physics, one to express the complex dimension of Sxt REPRODUCTION or wave state, and other to consider the particlefield cyclical vortex state.
The first equation is obviously c² ≈ Kurvature=acceleration/µagnetic ‘density’=inertial resistance,
where the field of light reproduction of information is the ratio between the spe accelerated speed and magnetic density of information of the system.
What all this means generally is that a and b are $pe and tïƒ functions and a x b is therefore an ST ‘new dimensional form’.
This in abstract might sound very general but when we study mathematical physics, we shall see what it means. Consider for example, the field of light spacetime:
In the graph, the cross product of the ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC, Tïƒ and $pe elements creates the 3rd dimension of reproductive speed in a light ray, and both are perpendicular to maximise the ‘inner product space’ they ‘absorb’ to reproduce its form in the speed of the wave (disregard the wrong wording, where it says energy should say entropy). Consider the magnetic force F on a charge q travelling at speed v in magnetic field B. (See electric motors for examples of magnetic forces.)
The magnitude of that force is proportional to v and proportional to B, so we need a product of the two vectors. The magnitude F of the force is also proportional to sin θ, where θ is the angle between v and B. Now this magnetic force F is a vector, so we need not just its magnitude, but its direction. That direction is at right angles to both v and B.In this case from the human pov, a being, which uses electronics as information and the gravitomagnetic field as entropy of motion, the magnetic flat field (Spe) x the informative high electric field, equals the STenergy speed of the system (energy ≈ v²). So the cross product DOES generate a 3rd element, normally st.
Angular momentum
The importance of angular momentum, becomes more clear in the modern bivector formulation. As IN CYCLICAL TIME, IT IS THE PRINCIPLE OF CYCLICAL INERTIA, AND HENCE ANGULAR MOMENTUM, THE FIRST REALITY FROM WHERE THE OTHER 2 ELEMENTS SPLIT, as recently confirmed by the adoption of the Hplanck in units of mass x area x time frequency, as the fundamental first unit of reality. Angular momentum thus encompasses within its form all other elements, the vital energy its ‘scans with areolar’ constant motion, the massdensity of the central singularity, and the frequency of its motion.
We have considered that certain ratios are of enormous importance as they become constants of the Universe, one of them is the ratio known as angular momentum. As it is the best description of a particle state, with 3 bits of information, the ‘density of information of the membrane’, its ‘speed of rotation’ and the radius to the ‘massmind singularity’, thus bringing together the ‘whole’ @ system with 3 simple parameters.
As such IT MUST BE CONSIDERED THE KEY parameter of the membrainsingularity physical system, and as such the unit of the quantum world, h, is measured in such terms, and ultimately mass can also be seen as a measure of an angular momentum, giving us the information about the whole system.
The angular momentum L (Ts) of a particle about a given origin is defined as: L = r x P
where r (t) is the position vector of the particle relative to the ‘singularity’ tiƒ origin, and P (spe) is the linear momentum of the particle.
Now consider the torque τ produced by a force F about an axis from which it is displaced by r. The magnitude of that torque is proportional to r and proportional to F, so again we need a product of two vectors; since R is obviously the radius of the Œsystem, related to its singularity, Tiƒ, and F, the membrane in motion that limits the system (its maximal Speelement)
The magnitude τ of the torque is also proportional to sin θ, where θ in this case is between r and F. (Notice that it, in both these cases, we need sin θ, whereas the scalar product had cos θ). The torque τ is a vector: torques in different directions in general cause rotations about different axes. That direction of the torque (which is often but not always parallel to the axis about which it causes rotation) is at right angles to both r and F.
So we define the vector product thus:
a X b = ab sin θ, and
a X b is at right angles to a and b in a right handed sense.
And the beauty of it is that it also has an ∆interpretation depending on which is the DOMINANT arrow $pe or tïƒ, upwards (so it becomes an informative growing ∆dimension) or downwards (so it becomes an entropic diminishing ∆direction).
And so we talk of a simple ternary system, generated by a cross product, which in modern maths is better described as the ‘surface’ parallelogram between both.
So the creation of dimensions or its transformation into each other fully defines the construction of full Spe<St>Tiƒ physical systems.
Finally we shall deal with the fifth dimension in physics, when we introduce the birth of ∆nalysis, its formalism, found in mathematical physics, which definitely married both disciplines. And will be our last part of introduction to mathematical physics, as an introduction to the third part of this blog, a review of all physical ∆planes…
We can in the graph observe how the ‘Rashomon effect’ (different povs and different equations to portrait the same phenomena) and the usefulness of relativity and 4D models, to illustrate different perspectives and dimensions.
In this case a key concept of both classic and new stience is the angular momentum, which can be seen as the membrane vortex in motion of physical systems, which will be ultimately the membrane of a mass singularity/enclosure.
In the four vector vision, angular momentum IS HOWEVER seen as a ‘quantised’ informative angular surface which shows the perspective of the centre of mass, which ‘absorbs’ a ‘radian’ quanta, h/2 of the force field ‘each slice of time.
So we can see in the relativity=max. mental stilness=max. present view of angular momentum, as a bidimensional triangular, radian plane.
It is then important to consider in much more depth the meaning of the ‘constants’ of action and 5D planes in physical systems, h, k, and.. c…as they will also have different states, as circular motions, (cspeed around black holes, h as spin), as lineal motions and energy parameters (h in e=hƒ, c in e=mc², etc.)
Ultimately our thermodynamic/magnetic world is a ‘vibration’ between the limits of those 2 ‘constants’ of our minimal informative particle/quantum scale, and our maximal speed of motion=reproduction of form, the constant c, which becomes the constant of scale of the next dark world beyond our Universe…
As the maximal value of reproduction of information of an ∆1 scale becomes a mere minimal quanta of space in the larger ∆+1 scale where the game starts afresh. So a cell might be a full being in ∆1 but becomes the minimal quanta of entropy to feed and ∆+1 super organism, and so on.
In other posts we go deeper in the meaning of Universal constants, and its multiple roles on mathematical physics.
Blocks of time
METAPHYSICS OF TIME
All this said to finally state that time is a block of eternalize, with an inner game of Possibilism, as the future branches always into 3 possible avenues of equal probability, for each T.œ: to go through a limb/potential maximal entropy, the path also of death; to reproduce/iterate a cycle, the body wave, preferred path of survival, and to wrinkle and suffer in a vortex of information, attracted by the stillness of pure perception, the path I felt in my youth, till all other paths, became one. Presentism, is the concept of simultaneous time, as space, the one studied by Einstein and Galilean relativity, the ‘shallowest’ of them all.
ALL DIMOTIONS AS DIMENSIONS
Spatial minds as whole enclosures of a vital spacetime, sucking its energy, acting as inelastic membrains with osmosis, taking advantage of both the inner and outer world, focused in the vampirical, parasite singularity, wholeness thus SHOULD SCALE TILL GOD, IS THE ABSOLUTE STILLNESS OF THE WHOLE GAME IMPRINTED AS A BLOCK OF TIMESPACE:
In the graph, time is a block, but the proper way to interpret it as such is not the lineal ‘single plane’ block of Einstein, for if future does NOT connect with the past, it does not repeat itself, neither the ∆view of determinist Laplacian time, as time does have ternary probabilities of branching, but the cyclical selfcontained block of time, either in its ternary view of a picycle that returns to its origin, or the somewhat more coherent ‘dice’ view, of a block of time with 6 alternative possibilities or ‘species’ of future, the 6th isomorphism based in the 6 possible ‘orientations’ or hierarchies between the S, T and ST physiological networks that define the being as dominant species of information, following/choosing that path, energy or entropy and its 6 hierarchical orders. Once those 6 combinations, sstt, tsts, stst, stts, stst, tsst exist either in space as ‘species’ or in time, as ‘paths’ all the elements of the block have been created.
Finally to notice that the concept of simultaneity, which is what Einstein uses in his concept is relative to the speed of perception of the observer who might see a longer present, if it is a slower mind. So the absolute block of time, would be the paradoxical perception by the slowest possible mind of the whole range of existences in a quanta or ‘cycle of its own perception that happens in the last image when the circle of mapping reality comes to the repetitive red point after gathering information and then a still image occurs.
It is similar to the way a screen tv maps out all the pixel of an image moving the electronic cathode but we see it all together in a still mapping, so the absolute block of time, will be ‘God’ the slowest being, seeing it all in an absolute repetition of all possible limited combinations of the Generator as a block of time. Existence then as a block of time depends also in the detail of our perception, since in great detail the number of events are infinite entanglements, but if we do not see in great detail, blocks of time appear to our mind.
In the graph we see the concept of a block of time. If our ‘scanning of information’ lasted not a second as the human mind mapping does to create its spatial stillness but a year, we would see the image of a block of time for the earth, void of detail as a disk, and wonder if we know it all about the Earth, a mere disk. So indeed the perceiver of the whole Universe is actually a very slow thinker and a very undetailed dumb perceiver. We humans are in that sense ‘blocks of time’ in the perception of the much faster gravitational scale between galaxies, v>c and indeed we see in simultaneity a block of time, at that faster scale in our slow view with no detail.
So all minds perceive a block of time in the limit of its slow, dumb perception. – its subjective definition of vacuum space…