S≈T
‘S≤≥T’… Symmetry of the 5 Spacetime dimensions of the Universe… l§
“Leibniz is right, there are infinite clocks of time in the Universe, but if so we have to restart science from scratch.’ ‘Two things i consider infinite, the Universe and the stupidity=ego of man’.
Einstein, father of General Relativity.
I.
Relational §paceðime
CORRESPONDENCE OF ∆S≈T WITH RELATIONAL SPACETIME
“According to Newton, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. God’s making is so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.”
Leibniz. On Newton’s absolute time, its lack of understanding of the eternal motion of time; of the Maya of the senses, as all forms of matter are gravitational vortices of accelerated motion – on its incapacity to measure properly those accelerated motions, (the errors of Mercury’s orbit) and finally on the denial of those cyclical, inertial motions, all of them still features of popular physics, which physicists STILL DON’T understand.
Time is any cyclical clocklike motion. It follows that as all clocks break space into an inner region we shall call ‘vital energy’ and an outer region, we shall call Universe or rather world, when reduced to the region we can perceive from the point of view of the time clock, and a region between them, which we shall call time proper, which if regular can be found to have a central point, we shall call the singularity reality is easily mapped out as a game of timecycles, as this simple scheme defines the 3 conserved forms of nature, and hence the Universe as a game of selfcentered time cycles that break all into its 3 conserve dimensional parts:
Singularity (1D: lineal momentum) + 2D (angular momentum=time clock) = Vital energy 3D inclosed between them.
So with all due respect to the millennial, ‘vidi, credo ergo sum generation’ of believers in the supreme intelligence of God almighty as interpreted by Newton and the likes, ‘Time is what the clock measures’ would say the best of them Mr. Einstein, we ARE GOING TO PUT another dimension of god almighty to complete the simple worldlines of physicists of absolute spacetime, and complete the work of Mr. Leibniz.
As we respect the principle of correspondence, it is worth to consider the antecedents of a theory of organic spacetime beings, to signify the change of paradigm from an abstract single spacetime continuous background, which Newton merely took from the Cartesian Plane that became the ‘Plenum of God’ – the dependent background against which all motions were measured, into a background independent theory.
Let us then before we introduce stientific beings, clarify from this historic perspective and the correspondence principle, the natural final evolution of the concepts of space time, from being a background of beings, to ‘being the being itself.
In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, with respect to which particles move. Space and time are a stage. Like actors on that stage, particles move, exert forces onto each other and generally act out the drama of dynamics, while the stage itself does not change. This is sketched in the following illustration. There, we see objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, but there is also a fixed background structure, space, which is just as real, pictured here as a lattice of intersecting lines.
Newton’s view of the universe is manifestly background dependent – whether or not a particle is moving or at rest is determined in relation to Newton’s absolute space and time.
Relationism. Aristotle & Leibniz: The philosopher of science
But even in Newton’s day, there were philosophers like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz who took a different stance. In modern parlance, theirs is a relationist point of view. For a relationist, there is no background of absolute space and time. The fundamental properties of the elementary entities consist entirely in relationships between those elementary entities. Time is nothing but changes in these relationships, and consists of nothing but the ordering of these changes. In the relationist version of the above illustration, only the objects, pictured as geometrical shapes, are real. The lattice has no independent existence. Even without the lattice, it does make sense to talk about the distance between two given objects. But it does not make sense to talk about the distance between two space points where there are no objects at all.
A relational world without spatial background
One of the fundamental discoveries of Einstein is that in our universe, there is indeed no fixed spacetime background. In Einstein’s theory of general relativity, which replaces Newton’s theory of mechanics and the gravitational force, the geometry of spacetime is not fixed. Instead it is an evolving, dynamical quantity. Physicists intent on describing our universe cannot just assume a given geometry. Instead, geometry is something that needs to be determined by solving certain equations that include all the effects of matter and energy.
A crucial aspect of Einstein’s dynamic geometry are gravitational waves, wavelike, travelling distortions of space geometry. Thus, experimental observations that energy leaks from binary pulsars such as PSR 1913+16 in the form of gravitational waves at the exact rate predicted by general relativity tells us that there is no more a fixed background of spacetime geometry than there are fixed crystal spheres holding the planets up.
All what exist is a motion in time. Space forms are Maya of the senses. In the graph, accelerated vortices of time in physical systems, in different scales of the fifth dimension: charges, masses and thermodynamic eddies become then the main clocks of time that carry with different speeds according to 5D metric (S x T=K), the information of microscopic quantum charge worlds, humansize thermodynamic scales and cosmological gravitational scales.
Essentially all clocks of time are cyclical motions, so the speed of a clock of time depends on the number of ‘Herzs’ or frequency of its motion, the smaller the more Herz, as information is the formfrequency of those cycles, smaller beings have more information and code larger beings, but and that is the ‘trick’ that creates teh fifth dimension, the ‘general law’ of those tme clocks is accelerated.
i.e. Einstein’s principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass, define mass as an accelerated vortex of grvitational information, our life existence is accelerated when you are a seminal seed, etc.
physicists uncoiled timefrequency, into lineal time, T=1/ƒ BY WRITING THE INVERSE equation… humanity is still in that primitive concept of a single time. Einstein just added to that XVI c. equation, V=s/T, (instead of using V= wave length x Frequency), which ELIMINATES the information on the frequency and shape of the steps of the motion.
it is the PRIMITIVE CONCEPT OF A SINGLE CLOCK OF TIMEINFORMATION FOR THE WHOLE UNIVERSE.
Poor Leibniz, a philosophical saint who believed in the best of all worlds, and spent most of his time trying to reunite the human wordmind, at that time broken into multiple religions on the meaning of God, the mind of the Universe, of which all monads were made to its image and likeness, along the path of a previous fellowman philosopher, who he greatly admired, the Catalan Raymond Llull, would be accused of plagiarism by Newton, who on the terse precision of Calculus Infinitorum, show his ‘true colors’, suddenly bringing some obtuse notes, basically rules of measure derived from his professor Isaac Barrow, starting a global campaign, backed by the growing power of Imperial Britain, according to which Leibniz had in a visit to London somehow got access to his library, obscure notes on fluxions and with premeditation and will to harm, changed it all and published its terse Latin prose.
Newton got mad at the guy and forbade him to accompany the King of England form whom Leibniz had been working for 30 years filling volumes of genealogies to make a living. Again we see the same pattern: the philosopher who does not make weapons, does not make a living, does not have power, does not convince the world of his higher truths. The king of course who disliked the philosopher that had won him the crown with his erudite volumes of genealogical rights left him behind. And he died alone. We don’t have his last words. But Voltaire would put his epitaph laughing at him in Candid, his alter ego, where a goodnatured Leibniz thought the world was the best of all worlds.
Come through a century. We have our two sides of good and bad science, knowledge vs. power. Now it is Darwin who realizes that the worldcycle of life and death has a pattern called evolution, a word derived from r=evolution.
On the other side Count Rumford, a British military engineer, noticed that limitless amounts of heat could be generated in the boring of cannon barrels and that the amount of heat generated is proportional to the work done in turning a blunt boring tool. Rumford’s observation of the proportionality between heat generated and work done lies at the foundation of thermodynamics. Another pioneer was the French military engineer Sadi Carnot, who introduced the concept of the heatengine.
And finally Clausius, a German physicist, resumed all this knowledge on ballistics, heat and lineal motions in the second laws of thermodynamics and the concept of entropy according to which the ‘Universe is dying’ because it is made of ‘lineal motions’ and ‘disordered death’, as all those killed with military weapons, because time was lineal, expanding… as the steam machines and weapons they were constructing. Again, we see the simple pattern: the profession of the ‘pretentious scientist’ becomes the ’cause’ of the Universe.
Among the Arawak, a tribe of fishermen of the Caribe, the Universe is not dying but moves above a huge turtle, as those they hunt for a living. For Kepler, God was a mechanical clocker, as the machine he used to measure it. For lineal German physicists, masters of weapons of mass destruction, it has always been lineal, entropic, born in ‘big bangs’, a mockery word coined by Hoyle, aware that the theory was born on the mind of all those who like Gamow contributed to make the Nuclear bomb, or like Lemaitre, believed in creationism.
Now it is a fashion to say that the Universe is a computer, because that is how scientists, increasingly mere attachments of its thinking machines, use computers to model it. I’m waiting for a physicist of those I met in some conferences on the ‘death corridor’ of research at Sandia Labs, to model it on a drone. LOL.
Of course, steam, gas, weapons, kill, move lineally, are space and die. But that is only half, or rather a third of the story of reality.
What we philosophers of science, experts in all disciplines, aware that logic time is the origin of mathematical space, and both, coupled with the mental, organic properties of life MUST be included in a Theory Of Everything, have been telling to physicists (but only they can talk to ‘artillery masters’, who in turn own the world) is that a true theory of reality must include those 3+0 elements of reality: its cyclical, timelike, logic properties; its lineal spacelike properties, its gaugingmeasuringmental properties and its organicsynchronous, structural properties, as parts become elements of wholes, which grow in size from the simplest atom through the cells, matter states, organisms, planets and galaxies that we perceive all over of the Universe.
There is the inner side of reality, the point of view of the cycles of time, ignored since Einstein again affirmed the concept that time is the 4th dimension of lineal space.
We shall of course explain what is the use of that concept for measures (as always good, physicists DO master measure of lineal distance that is granted), but also how dumb it is the concept and how much it has harmed the development of the whys of the Universe, and the study of Time.
So my advice to them is ‘let it go’. Do not talk so much about the meaning of it all. This is the task of philosophers of science. Study your motions and that is good enough. And learn, about the cycles of time, to complete your science, a knowledge we shall provide in those texts.
“Though most arachnids are solitary animals, some spiders live in enormous communal webs housing males, females, and spiderlings. Most of the individuals live in the central part of the web, with the outer part providing snare space for prey shared by all the inhabitants”. Britannica
The structure of Tƒ<TS<Sp, territorial spaces with a central point of view, developing its particular worldview, trying to reach infinity with his distorted geometry, affine to a projective geometry where far away means small, defines each world of a Universe, which is objective when ‘clashing’ each form with all others – so only eusocial love, and emergence through the scales of the 5^{th} dimension make survival possible.
Indeed, we are going to expand into biology the purpose of ‘time’ science, well beyond anything physicists will provide, to explain why time cycles happened, what kind of time cycles exist, what is the reasons of their organic structure in synchronic systems, classify them all, and explain all actions not only those of lineal motion, which is the only ones physicists truly study.
As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5th dimension’ of scales of spacetime (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNAcells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.
And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a selfcentered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5th dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a selfcentered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stockmarket’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.
There is here a pattern which will be repeated between philosophers of science sponsors of an organic sentient universe, of cyclical time and fractal space, ending in relative oblivion vs. the military physicists of lineal time and military power that carry the day and we shall see the pattern in the lives of each century masters of spacetime studies: Galileo vs. Descartes, Newton vs. Leibniz, Boltzmann vs. Darwin, Einstein vs.…
And we will return to that historic understanding of perhaps the biggest blunder of mankind, many times.
Why, of course, T.Œ has its explanation. Since the equation of the mind shows that all those Aristotelian Gods, the unmoved centers that control the limited territorial energy around them are by nature selfcentered. He, Aristotle, the first philosopher of science, which physicists dislike so much – they prefer Plato – also understood it all and so he said we are all Gods. And we shall return to his wisdom from time to time. The souls of Descartes, the Monads of Leibniz do not really like to share but absorb energy and information, as black holes do till they explode.
They are by their own nature as a relative center of their world characteristically arrogant knots of thought. But as long as we do NOT commit the error of Newton, who converted Descartes world, the relative frame of mind of the human being, made of 3 perpendicular light dimensions, the whole universe, converting our relative spacetime into the absolute spacetime, and discharging all other monads, as nonexistent, we can understand. The problem happens, when as physicists do, they reduce them all to their view, and on top they deform it extending the Cartesian coordinates of a pen and paper abstract artifact, to encompass all the time cycles of the universe, equalized by their single mechanical clock, uncoiled into an infinite line of duration.
This is the error of Newton. All cycles are finite, as they close into themselves. All worldcycles of life and death are finite as they end as they begun in the dissolution of death. All entropic motions stop. All time vortices once they have absorbed all the entropy of their territory become wrinkled, and die. Newton died, his ‘time duration’ did not extend to infinity.
But those minds measure from their selfcentered point of view, only a part of the Universe, and the rest remains obscure. So all of them display the paradox of the ego, as they confuse the whole Universe with their world, and see themselves larger than all what they don’t perceive. Hence as Descartes wittingly warned the reader in his first sentences ‘every human being thinks he is gifted with intelligence.’
So how relational timespace creates our illusion of space and time as single continuum?
The equations are simple; ∑spaces=Absolute space, ∑ time cycles / human time clock equaliser = Single time clock.
Meaning we peg together all vital spacebeing, with its ternary parts SpeLimbs<Stbodywaves>tiƒsingularity head/particles and alas we call it all together absolute space, then we ’empty it in content’ and we have a spatial cartesian system, we focus on our mindpov.
And we take all the time cycles of the universe, and we divide them in units till we get to measure them all in seconds:
But space and time do exist.
It is then necessary to conclude since absolute continuous time and space are merely a mathematical cartesian artefact on paper to study equations, but there is nowhere to be found, and yet we are CONSTANTLY existing as beings with a finite time and a finite extension in space, that WE ARE space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: organic (ab.œ), scalar (a. §) §paœ, and cyclical discontinuous time ‘lives… existences’ .
So as organic spacetime beings coexisting in several scales, we do change also the word science for STienŒ, stienœs that describe the different spacetime beings ordered by 5D metric:
In the graph, absolute and relative timespace. Absolute timespace is the fifth dimension as wholes come after parts, evolution selects wholes and so the arrow of wholes dilates time adding ±scales, as each whole will be ‘grounded’ on a smaller part. I.e. a bigger whole will feed in entropic smaller beings, whales in plankton, galaxies in light spacetime, Universes in dark entropy… Below the arrows of relative time, as all lifeexistences are zerosums which return to its origin.
In the next graph we show you those concepts visually so you can realize that all is made of cycles of time (seen as information in still relative no motion) and planes of space (seen as kinetic lineal momentum, in its relative motion):
In the graph, the bidimensional nature of time cycles, divides the 4 dimensions of timespace in 2 ‘formal motions’, tall, cyclical time, which carries the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles (as the nsphere has the maximal volume in minimal space), as such is the gauging ‘particlehead on top of all systems (so photons stay longer on top of the wave, your head is on top, as an informative mammal, with the dimension of height, eyes and cameras are spheres and antennae are on top, so are speakers: function is form) and wide, lineal space planes, which are the most extended fastest distance between points so fast ‘planes’ are… planes, limbs and fields are planes.
The graph clarifies the meaning of time – a tall cycle or clock; information, and its equivalent perception as still; information.
It shows the meaning of a generic quanta of space, a flat plane with lineal momentum or kinetic energy which is the lineal motion of a plane of space.
Now, to fully grasp the different clocks of Nature, we need to dwell on the 3^{rd} fundamental concept of the fractal universe, the fact the Universe is made of such relative scales of space quanta and cyclical clocks, because it is a fractal, made of discontinuous pieces of space and cycles of time. Yet as we say we have the wonderful fact that Energy and information, the integral and still perception of all those quanta put together is conserved, to relate them all and ‘do mathematical physics’.
Why Energy works in all the scales of size of the Universe? And yet it is so improperly defined, with so many ambiguous terms.
If you grasped those simple concepts, Ei =∑ Sp x Tƒ ‘void’ of any historic bias, we can get into the order of all of them, called the ‘5^{th} dimension and streamline physics and biology, into a single science.
Since, Ei = ∑Sp x Tƒ, becomes the most general possible equation for all the fractal systems of energy and information that integrate all the vital spaces and time frequencies of all the systems of the Universe. This is what we call the ‘Metric’ equation of the 5^{th} dimension.
And while Energy seems to be a concept applied to all realities we have also localized different ‘quanta of spatial lineal motionsdistances’, and different clocks of time for those quanta.
Cyclical times have more form, more dimensions than lineal space, as they are time cycles, not lines, and this fact – that cyclical time, has more dimensions than a line, is vital to the whole understanding of time cycles. How many more dimensions?
In the graph, since space and time now had two dimensions each, we can compare them, and transform one into each other, we could write that property with a simple formula, where Sp is a flat plane of ‘lineal space’ and Tƒ is a cycle of tall time.
Sp (length, width) ≈ Tƒ(height, frequency)
This simple beat of existence, flat fields of space that become tall cycles of time, energy that converts into information, is one of the commonest beats of the universe. And its rhythms explain infinite transformations.
Now this is very important because it can be generalized to all systems and allow the transformation of space dimensions into time dimensions. As only parameters with the same dimensionality can be transformed into each other. So a cyclical vortex of time (a mass, a charge, an angular momentum, you name it) can be changed into an, entropic motion that expands into a plane of space, precisely because they are 2 dimensional.
And this will then be carried to the 3 dimensional symmetry between 3 spatial topologies (toroidlimbs fields, hyperbolic wavesbodies and spherical headsparticles) and its 3 time motionsages (entropic youth, fast motions; reproductive, iterative adult ages and informative, 3^{rd} ages).
And then every 3 spacetime symmetries that fill up a plane of the 5^{th} dimension will emerge upwards or dissolve downwards into larger or smaller scales also with dual motions as ‘energy and information emerges’ into a new scale with new topologies of space, new motions and clocks of time, or dissolves into an infinity.
This resolves a fundamental conundrum of modern physics – why information is bidimensional: because it is the frequency and form of time cycles that are bidimensional, tall and with a bit rhythm, a dimension of motion.
So in the graph we can see the principle of the Holographic Universe, physicists are trying to define (10.000 papers only in the past decade about it) but have not yet grasped as they do NOT understand space, time, information and energy, (kinetic, potential, its integral, etc.).
We can then see that the holographic principle merely means that if you give to ‘time cycles’ the dimension of ‘height’, then you do have the 4 dimensions broken in 2 for spatial lineal, planar kinetic energy, width and length, and 2 for cyclical time clocks, beat, frequencymotion and height.
Alas, because only things with the same dimensions can transform into each other, now we can truly understand the holographic principle: Our 4 dimensional Universe is made of flat planes of spatial lineal kinetic energy, we shall call Spe and tall cyclical bits of information we shall call Tiƒ. When they combine they create a being of spacetime, in 4 dimensions.
In the right we see the simplest one, a light beam clearly made of a tall, informative, electric field, perpendicular to a magnetic, energetic magnetic field, reproducing along the length of its cspeed.
Below we see humans and machines, which do have lineal, energetic, planar limbs//bodies, or as in weapons, lineal systems of release of kinetic energy, and cyclical, informative, eyes, brains, heads particles that gauge and process logically or mathematically information.
Further below we see how a black hole, the informative nucleus of the Galaxy, similar to the DNAinformative nucleus of a cell in a smaller scale
It does have a tall high dimension and an enormous clocklike cyclical rhythm, the event horizon turning at cspeed. So if light is the quintessential plane of space, with both components but clearly dominant in flat, length, the black hole is the inverse, extreme case of an informative cyclical clocklike vortex of time.
The fact is the Universe is made of both lineal and cyclical motions, space and time, lineal and angular momentum, quanta of space and time clocks.
And the Universe is made of informative mass vortices, with gravitational information, as the galaxy we are in, reason why we are informative beings. Yet between galaxies, there are fractal planes of flat space with dark energy similar to the expansive entropy of gases. And both balance each other in the fractal universe.
Now because physicists; do not understand or accept despite amazing number of proofs, the fractal structure of the Universe, they do NOT realize that the expansive entropy of flat space between galaxies is balanced by the implosive conversion of that flat space into mass by cyclical clocklike tall vortices of information – black holes.
Thus the arrow of information or arrow of evolution increases the dimensions of tall information, and so life evolved from flat worms into tall informative humans. So it does space, which time bends into cyclical vortices of mass. Or as Einstein said ‘time curves space into mass’.
This is the Universe which Einstein said is ‘simple and not malicious’. And he put it in a simple equation E= M (c²), which explains how the Universe constantly transforms its kinetic energy/entropy (light, electromagnetic, thermal radiation) into informative masses, back and forth in big bangs and big crunches.
Now as always the simplest proofs of the bidimensionality of space and time, which is essential to the structure of the Universe, are mathematical. Of this, already the Greeks took note, as they could not calculate easily a cube volume from 2 cubes. He fact is, there is not superposition of tridimensional cubic forms: X^{3}+Y^{3}≠ Z^{3}, the famous Fermat Theorem. And there are NOT numbers of 3 elements, but only single numbers, bidimensional numbers (complex numbers) and quaternary numbers (quaternions) albeit without commutative properties. An interesting property for more advanced courses.
So why we talk of 4 dimensions in standard physics, with a ‘signature’ of +, , – , – whereas + is a time dimension and – means a space dimension? And further on in any bigger dimensional model physicists will always write a ‘signature’ of +, , , , , ….. , .
Simple, because they have no idea what to do with ‘time’, what a time dimension might mean, stuck in a single lineal time duration and entropy, spatial time dimension. As they have deformed time into lines and never got back and look at what they did, but accumulate deformation upon deformation, and now the ‘hump’ paraphrasing Nietzsche is so huge that there is no lion able to cut it off and run faster.
Indeed, even the + in Einstein’s Relativity is NOT pure time, but ct, and since c is a speed, hence v=s/t, really what we write here simplifying the concept is ct=s/t x t = s, ‘eliminating time properties’ and making it lineal spacelike. We analyze in depth many ‘times’ this spatialization that kills ALWAYS the 4 features of time cycles on the physical discourse: to be cyclical, hence to be repetitive and so causal reason of the repetitions and patterns we call laws of science, to break space into fractal inner vital spaces and outer regions and to be bidimensional at least to close the cycle.
Simple, the combination of bidimensional fields of energy and information creates a holographic Universe of space and time with 2 states present waves balanced in S and t parameters and PastSp>FutureTƒ: Potential>particles.
Or the superposition of layers of bidimensional ‘present’ wavebodies create a ternary dimension, with a 4^{th} dimension of motion:
∑ bidimensional (space or time) layers > 3 Dimensional (space or time volume or flow) > 4 Dimensional (volume of space with motion, flow of time with form).
Space as expansive, decelerating entropic fieldmotion and time clocks as cyclical accelerated motion are 2 concepts akin to Descartes’ ‘Res extensa’ and ‘vortices’, which he considered rightly to be the two formal motions of the Universe are thus the ultimate poles of physical existence.
WE DO have though here 2 ‘symmetries’, which constantly are used to explain reality. The dual symmetry of cyclical time clocks, accelerating inwards, and expansive entropy decelerating outwards.
But then we shall also consider the still vs. motion ternary symmetry between space and time: Spfields/limbs <STbody waves>TƒHeads/particles, perceived in simultaneous spatial stillness or temporal flow.
Yes, we know them so well, intuitively that before physicists reduced time to what the clock measures and not even that – we learned to talk to describe them. So we invented ‘verbal times’ to explain the 3 dimensionsmotions of time: past, present and future.
What is the difference between them? We shall soon get to it. But first we must resolve the implications of a time described as a cycle. First the obvious: if time is a cycle, there are infinite times, and what physicists call lineal time, absolute time, is as Leibniz, the philosopher said to Newton – well not to Newton, who would not receive him, but to Clarke, a ‘friend of a friend’ – is just the pegging together of all those finite time cycles.
Next, if time is a cycle – and here is where the insights of Einstein have its value – we can SEE time, as long as the cycle is fast enough to close in less time that the eye takes into seeing. So all ‘time cycles’ that close in less than the second the eye takes into make a ‘still picture’ of the Universe.
And this brings us the solution to the second Principle of Physics: ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’. The relativity of all motions, which can not be distinguished from stillness, when the cyclical motion is fast enough to seem a solid form in the case of closed time cycles, or when we are moving along the frame of reference of the other motion with the same ‘spatial lineal speed’.
So in the same manner that Mr. Einstein built his Relativity on the aforementioned principle, (only referred to lineal space, as he never understood cyclical time), we shall build a much more rich meaning for the Universe, on the aforementioned principle, based in the duality of cyclical time forms of information or time clocks in motion and lineal space forms or distances and line motions.
The reproduction of Motion dominates the perception of form. A Universe of repetitive actions of energy and time.
Now, it is important to understand that the Universe is made of ‘Energy and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind things otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox. The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.
This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.
Formal, topological definition of timepoints: minds, and spacefields.
‘Each point holds a world in itself’ Leibniz
As we shall repeat once and again, the true colossus of science have been his philosophers NOT his physicists, though Planck and Einstein, once philosophy of science waned, have value in its statements. Aristotle, Descartes & Leibniz thus form the triad of intuitive geniuses GST will when fully developed consider its western pioneers. Let us then translate their ‘monadintutions’ in a formal topological definition:
“A mind singularity is a point of time displaced in its latitude of synchronous clocks speeds that occupies a single quanta of space, a field is a extension of simultaneous space enclosed in a single quanta of time.”
We concluded earlier that pure time, the absolute arrow is that of the fifth dimension, relative time is the world cycle as it ends always in a zero moment, lineal time duration is a distortion of cyclical time, made continuous by pegging cycles of time one after another.
How can then we define properly relational time and space in formal terms? In the previous sentence we resume the concept, which takes the inversion of informative time and entropic space to its natural limits.
They will be the formal limits of the being – its linguistic mind that stores all the information of the system in a single pointquanta of space (atom, cell, citizen); and can be better understood closer to humans in our social systems: a point of time or mind in a nation is the king, president of the nation, a single quanta of its space population; which is connected through the physiological networks of information of the system (the laws) to all the quanta of space who obey, and become synchronised by it.
The quanta of the galaxy is the black hole, a single central volume similar to that of a star, connected by gravitational forces to all its stars; and your ego, likely will be a single neuron of maximal communication with all its other neurons, themselves connected to all other cells; in the super organism of history we call a religion, it is the prophet whose memetic DNA connects it to all other believers in time. A POINT OF TIME, thus is a mind and it will be structured through causal time in its connection to other beings through synchronicity.
On the other hand, a extension of space exists simultaneously in a quanta of time, and so its extension will paradoxically depend of the underlying speed of its lower scale that ‘entangles it’. Those are laws of quantum physics, illunderstood, which can be extended to all other systems of the Universe.
Nature’s time clocks constantly accelerate into information and decelerate into energy.
Nature’s time clocks do vary their speed in different regions of space – the great discovery of relativity – which means each spacetime being has a different time speed. But they also vary their speed as they trace a finite time cycle, either imploding an accelerating as a time vortex of increasing information: max. tif x min spe (informative time arrow of future), or decreasing in speed of time and increasing in space (max. spe x min. tif), creating an entropic arrow. A world cycle of existence is therefore the sum of all those changes in the arrows of time of a being, which ‘magically’ become ordered in 3 ages: Max. Spe (youth), Spe=tif (adultreproductive age) and Max. tif (3rd age of information), which explodes back into entropy in the moment of death (tif<<Spe).
In the graph on the left the version of those ages in an informationenergy scale, in the center the first human observation of the process in scientific taoism, in the right, an informative time clock or vortex, V x R=k, which is the commonest manifestation in physical systems of the arrow of information, called ‘charges’ (∆1 scale) or masses (∆+1 scale).
But we want to go a bit further and consider how the Universe does it; how it assemblies parts into wholes; how extends a form and expands it to ‘become’ a new whole departing from seminal parts.
We are made of vital space=energy, and temporal information, timeclocks that store the information, the form of the Universe in the frequency an form of its cycles. This is sooo evident, which first we must wonder how our nature as ‘beings that occupy a vital space’, whose motions and processes of time=change are finite in its world cycles between birth and extinction, which was fully understood in all perennial philosophies of the Universe and the common behaviour of people (as when we say I don’t have enough time and energy to do this), became forgotten.
Since, as yangyin, spacetime, energyinformation beings, all similar words we soon will define with precision, the unity of it all, an our similarity as part of larger spacetime beings, made of inner smaller cellular spacetime beings, all our properties will soon be understood and seen as homologies of all other spacetime beings.
But humans have for four hundred years forgotten this reality because when science started to facilitate measure physicists equalised all the timeclocks of nature to the beat of the mechanical timeclock, itself tuned to the human ‘timeclock’ of a second, which is the timeclock of our eye glimpses, thoughts, heartbeats and limbsteps.
Thus humans are one second frequency beings, and one meter (the average size of our spatial limbslegs) spacebeings. Our min thinks every second on the still mindvisual mapping the eye does, and moves the body with a second beat of the heart, to adequate the one meter per second steps of normal walking. But each other species of spacetime will have a different sizespacerod of measure and timebeatfrequency. Reality is the tapestry of all those infinite time clocks and spacerods. THERE IS NOT an absolute background timeclock or spacerod, but ‘finite time clocks’ and ‘spacesteps’ for each being (regardless of the more complex synchronicities an sequences established by the harmony between huge supœrganisms an its parts).
So where the cartesian absolute spacetime graph, which Newton confused with an absolute Universal spacetime graph, comes from? Exactly from the human mindmirror of Mr. Descartes, which used it as an artefact to facilitate measures from the human point of view, our timeclock rhythm and size. But Descartes was very clear affirming this ‘euclidean, perpendicular’ spacetime frame of reference was NOT the Universal spacetime, but the ‘worldmindmirror’ of man, our specific graph to measure space and time in a convenient form. As the word ‘Universe’ is NOT the background universe lettering of which the Universe is made but merely a human language to refer to it, the cartesian graph with its lineal single timeclock and continuous paperwhite space is NOT the ‘substance’ of which the Universe is made but a ‘linguistic representation’ of it, to make practical human pointofview measures.
So it is useful for praxis of science but a philosopher of science looking for the whys must be fully aware that the artefact of absolute space and time does NOT exist in the Universe. Yet since we do exist as timedurations occupying vital spaces, that is, space and time IS, if it is NOT an abstract background, but IT IS, we must be MADE OF IT. And this is truly a very important ‘first principle’, to do an objective philosophy of science about ‘god’, man and the Universe. As I did in the pioneer encyclopaedia of fractal cyclical 5D spacetime beings, which upgraded the models of relational spacetime, explored in this blog, back at the turn of the century (picture of the spanish edition of the model).
Because of the success of analytical geometry for a praxis of building and measuring spacetime events from the referential point of view of man, was so enormous, the philosophical error of confusing the graph of mathematics used to measure time and space, with time and space itself, didn’t bother earlier physicists, which were concerned only with the praxis of measure and the construction of mostly entropic systems of war and transport (weapons, engines).
This bias due to praxis in science is often forgotten but plagues physics and we shall see soon history and economics, as sciences which are more concerned with power and action, construction and reproduction of systems than first principles. So the bias tends to make physical theories of the Universe entropic ‘bigbang’ like theories that match the job of creating entropic machines and weapons, ‘conveniently’ forgetting, as irrelevant the arrow of informative forces which balance entropic forces (i.e. entropy theories come from gaseous states of matter, which conveniently forget the crystal order of reproduction of information of solid states; the expansion of intergalactic space, origin of bigbang only theories, conveniently forgets the imploding informative nature of galaxies that create matter from vacuum space, curving and balancing the expansion of dark entropy, and what IS MORE IMPORTANT, defining planet Earth and life, as part of that vortex of galactic information as systems that evolve life and technological information) and so on.
So the reader should dismiss from the beginning his beliefs on a single entropic Universe, as an ‘idol of the tribe’, in Baconian terms; that is, a theory biased by power, proved false by the repetitive, energetic and informative events of the Universe.
Indeed, the physical theory of the Universe is an entropic theory where timeinformation is submissive to space; because most physicists are no aware the bias on his definition of time, produced by the worldly profession of physicists, due to the enormous respect machines and weapons cause in our technological civilisation.
Instead, for the ultimate whys he must look for the discipline of knowledge dedicated to that search which is philosophy of science, because it does have NO praxis or power to impose biased, conscious, historic or subconscious views and because it does respect in equal footing every scale and discipline of stience – unlike physics with its entropy bias and professional bias, as they naturally try to construct all scales as if ORIGINATED by the particle scale they study, unaware of the ABSOLUTE relativity of all those scales, all of them selfsimilar, coexisting as organic structures across three ternary ∆scales, performing similar ternary timearrows and ultimately being made to the image and likeness of all other beings of the cosmos.
This larger, more complex view, perhaps less precise in some measure details, however embraced by the correspondence principle as ‘details’ of those larger thoughts of God is not new at all, but it has been expressed with more or less rigour by all the philosophers of science of the western an eastern tradition, without bias, in search of whys, as we shall repeat the Universe is a simple structure, made complex by its fractal repetition an multiplicity of variations in its ensembles. In the modern age, it was in fact underlying the work of the two founders of modern mathematics an philosophy of science, Descartes and Leibniz.
Indeed, modern philosophers of science, notably Descartes, who had designed the graph, and Leibniz, who used it to give the first hints to the scalar nature of the Universe with its infinitesimal calculus, where each point had a ‘world of infinitesimal parts within itself’, understood if mathematics worked as mindmirrors with a center of reference, it was because the Universe must be filled with selves, ordering its territories from their points of view.
Both realized that if they could use a mathematical selfcentred frame of reference to extract laws of science from it, it meant that the Universe was filled with topologic ‘selves’, points of view which mimic those graphs to act in the Universe from an infinite number of selfcentred frames.
And thus a philosophy of science about a fractal sentient Universe, appeared from the very beginning of modern science, which the practical, pedestrian attitude of physicists, who ‘never ask the whys’, soon relegated to oblivion. Let us regain those insights of the founding fathers of philosophy of science, to understand the whys of the Universe.
We are all made of relational, vital space and time frequencies.
Leibniz argued with Newton that absolute ðime§pace – an artifact of measure obtained from the transposition of a sheet of paper drawn with a mathematical coordinates to the entire Universe – did not exist.
That beings occupied a certain §pace and lasted a certain ðime, different from each other. So we were all beings made of relational ðime§pace, the ‘ultimate reason of things’ or necessary substance. In the graph, on the left Leibniz’s view that gets away with the ‘nowhere to be seen’, paper an pen absolute graph of ðime§pace of Newton for the sake of ‘epistemological truth’. Space is what those objects occupy, and below there is another ‘scale of §pace’ (which ultimately becomes ‘background radiation’, that is light ðime§pace, or gravitational waves even smaller in size).
So §pace is really a series of fractal layers of growing scales of size. On the other hand, each of those objects will have ‘rhythms’ and ‘motions’ different of each other regulated by its inner ðimecycles (circadian cycles in nature, waverhythms, repetitive actions of feeding, sleeping, mating and son on), which are the essence of what they are. As when we say ‘I don’t have enough ‘ðime’ to do this’. So reality is a tapestry of ðime§pace beings, and the laws of those beings must then be extracted from this substance of which they are made.
Because physicists are not worried with ontological questions; but with measure of ðime motions an §pacesizes, as they came to dominate science, the search for the ultimate reasons derived of those two substances, §pace and ðime, were forgotten. And what is worst, the reverence to the machines of physics, brought about the dismissal as ‘secondary’ theories, those theories of ðime, notably evolution, which studies the changes of form and information of beings through their lifedeath cycles as individuals or species. And all what people cared about ðime, was the extreme precision of measure in physical analysis of ‘motions’ through that supposed ‘measure tool’, which is the graphed absolute Cartesian>Newtonian artifact of ðime§pace.
Things went so far that finally a single ‘absolute clock’ set by God was declared by Newton and assumed regardless of whom put it on motion for all beings. Leibniz quipped, when this clock found itself ‘different’ for the rotary clocklike motions of Mercury:
“According to Newton, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from ðime to ðime: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. God’s making is so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.”
Leibniz. On Newton’s absolute ðime, its lack of understanding of gravitational vortices, (the errors of Mercury’s orbit) and the denial of cyclical, inertial motions, still features of popular physics.
It would take though despite the amazing evidence of ðime cycles in Nature an biology an history, (physicists as the high popes or ‘seers of ðime’ – definition of God in Saint Augustine’s work, do not consider relevant findings in other sciences), another physicist who realize the clocks of ðime around the sun decelerated, so Mercury ha different clocks, as gravitation ‘curves’ the form of those clocklike orbits more in its surroundings. So he discovered that after all Leibniz was right, and ðime clocks have different speeds in different regions of the physical Universe also (besides having different rhythms in different life beings).
When Einstein discovered the existence of infinite cyclical clocks of ðime (ðime bend §pace) and quantum physicists the broken nature of §pace, showing Leibniz right, physicists had gone so far into the ‘art’ of measure that the whys of reality, derived from its ultimate reason, the substance of which are all made, quantum §pace and cyclical ðime was parked as an ‘inconvenient truth’. ‘Leibniz is right – said Einstein – but if so we have to rebuild science from in its inception’.
So Leibniz, by far the highest mind of science in the western tradition, only comparable to the father of them All, Aristotle, was again denied, as Newton had done in a rather despicable way, accusing him of plagiarism for discovering and publishing earlier calculus, forbidding him to accompany the new king of England, and publishing in the royal society. Now simply speaking, Physicists didn’t feel intelligent enough to fully grasp the concepts behind relational ðime§pace and expand our view of the Universe of ðime§pace. So another century passed.
But truth, as complex as it might be always returns with a vengeance. ‘Truth exists’ and so the goal of reaching a more complex understanding of the fundamental principles of reality space, time, its casual actions that combine both and the minds that perceive them – will always be the goal of the philosopher of science.
II.
KNOTS OF ðIME$PACE CYCLES
Of the 12 Kantian categories, Schopenhauer rejects 11 as redundant, and retains only causality. He then discusses the a priori nature of ðime, §pace and its causality (ab.∆), the 3 innate functions of all minds” (ab.•) .
Introduction to Schopenhauer “On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason’ (∆causality, •Mind, §pace & ðime)
“Call information entropy. Nobody knows what entropy really is, so you have the advantage.”
Neumann to Shannon on S.
DUALITY: HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE
The first and most important element of the Universe are its dimensions, described mathematically but whose conceptual meaning so far escapes science. We shall thus define first its two fundamental 0) logic=temporal elements 1) geometric=spatial and:
0) The duality of perception of dimensions, either as motion or as distance form (Galilean paradox), which we ust have explained
1) The bidimensional nature of all parts of the Universe (holographic principle); the next instalment in the architectonical building of reality departing from time cycles.
1.Holographic principle. Bidimensional ðime (information with motion) and entropy (§pace with motion)
‘Simplicity is genius’ ; ‘Saper vedere’. Leonardo on the topology of life and its harmonious forms
‘Coincidentia opositorum’ Cusa, on the fundamental dialectic dualist logic of the Universe, which constantly brings the opposite properties of ‘Lineal entropy’ and ‘closed information’ into Complementary Spaceðime energy beings.
In topological terms, there is lesser ambiguity:
Time clocks are always cyclical and related to information stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, as the circle or the sphere in three dimensions are the forms which store more form with less surface. On the other hand §pace is lineal, with less dimensional forms of information, and more extension in §pace, as the line is the shortest distance between two points a an b. A circle thus made of a simple rotating radius is a clock and traces a external membrane, which can be seen still as a whole or a point moving. It thus have a dimension more than its ‘spatial state’, moving between A and B. We shall call the ‘function of a point or line as a circle’, an informative function, and the function of a line as a pure motion in §pace an entropic function. In the graph, left, the simplest form in existence in the Universe, we can ‘perceive’ is a form with motion (all what you see is indeed forms with motions); a line limb/field of entropy, moving a head/particle of information.
And two logic immediate properties of the nature of those two elements combined or disjoined are:


 The inverse properties of spatial entropy and temporal information, its fundamental logic property. In graph, the inverse function between Spatial, entropic expansion and Temporal, informative Implosion has infinite manifestations and can be defined by a simple equation of inverted ‘hyperbolic’ nature: ð=1/S. As we defined cyclical ðime the inverse of Lineal Time , ƒ=1/t, it follows that physicists ‘Lineal Time ‘ is indeed lineal §pace with motion, hence the discovery latter on that Lineal Time is a dimension of §pace (Einstein).
 The fact that one can be transformed into the other, which is essential for the dynamic nature of the Universe. So we define a first simple ‘Generator equation’ of ðime§pace beings:

Γst. $pe (entropic §pace) < ≈ > ðiƒ (Temporal information)
If we ad the topological form (Lineal Space: $) an cyclical time: ð, as alternate synoptic symbols for spatial entropy and cyclical information.
And call the combinative state ðime§pace momentum, whose ‘integral’ (in physics, extended soon to all systems) is called Energy, the ‘third element’ of reality: Spentropy > StEnergy < Tinformation
Whereas the intuitive symbols of ‘expansion’ < and ‘implosion’ > indicate that TO TRANSFORM one into the other, through an intermediate ‘momentumenergy state’, entropy must shrink into information, Spe>Tiƒ or information must expand into entropy, Tiƒ<Spe.
We can now ad to this ternary ‘topological’ discovery, the ‘duality’ of motions vs. distancesforms, to fully define ðime, form, §pace, entropy, energy and information.
Trinity: E x I = STbeings of energy
‘From 1 (the yangline of entropy) comes 2 (the yin sphere of form), from 2 comes 3 (the yinyang energetic being), from 3 come the ∞ beings’ Cheng Tzu
We made a huge first statement – that entropy is expansive §pace and information is stored in ðime clocks, just ‘seen’ with different ‘quantity of motion’. Time is form in motion. Space is static entropy.
Yet to fully grasp the interaction of those 2 arrows, we need to explain another fundamental law of the Universe, which puzzles scientists for decades – the holographic Principle – that is, the fact that information is bidimensional, as in the ‘tall, flat screen or paper you are reading’.
THE HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE.
Consider only another bit of it on those equations of Einstein’s relativity, where time is ‘packed in all its dimensions’ as the present ∂t derivative of spacespeed. Physicists go merrily playing with its magic, and it ‘works’. But wait a second… only systems with the same dimension can compare and transform into each other.
So how 3 space dimensions and one time dimension work? The magic here is that the height dimension is the ‘static dimension’ of information related to time which stores in its cyclical clocks, in its frequency and form the information of the Universe. So a clock is ‘besides’ the flat plane of space’, a ‘tall form’. And so we NEED to give height as a dimension of time, then time is the bit/frequency of the cycle, and the flat surface of space – the flat Universe, the flat plane, is the form that moves lineally. So again we see how black holes are ‘tall’ IN THE CENTER OF A TIMELIKE accelerated clock vortex:
In the graph, we see reality both as fixed distances of space and as a series of discontinuous motions, and time. Thus reality is perceived either as a single lineal geometry or time duration. And inversely cyclical forms, as seen as circles or as cyclical clocks, with a frequency that determines its capacity to carry information, when it becomes fixed as ‘memorial space’.
Thus 2 x 2 dualities of O vs.  time motion vs. spatial form are the key paradoxes, which need to be resolved for each species to understand the game of spacetime:
Lineal Time, t, has the dimension of motion and in its cyclical ‘clocklike ðime, also the dimension of Height.
This seen as space give birth to lineal distances, $ whole clocks of ðime live a memorial trace of information, made of formal §pace.
Space has the dimension of length and the dimension of reproductive width:Information is defined as the maximal number of DIMENSIONAL FORMs=MOTIONs of an entity (Galileo’s paradox: motion indistinguishable of distance, due to the spacetime symmetry).
SYMMETRIES OF SPACETIME are then possible because only entities with the same dimensions can transform into each other. So now we have 4 different bidimensional entities, information (bidimensional form with motion), time, cyclical form with motion, space, bidimensional sheet with minimal form,and only energy, its spacetime combinations deploy in a single sheet of spacetime, 4 Dimensions.
The graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:
Once it is clear that there are different mathematical frames of reference, of different sizes; that mind reduce in scale reality – the Universe into worlds, and that dimension and motion are indistinguishable – absolute features of reality, which will be formalized soon with the proper understanding of the ‘undefined terms of mathematics’ (fractal points, lineal waves, and networks≈planes – we need to fully grasp the unit of the Universe, a ‘point with volume’, or fractal point, hence a time cycle.
The duality of time≈motion and space≈form, and its two varieties, continuous open decelerating speed≈distances and closed accelerating cycles≈circles of time, are both paradoxes of perception and objective, inverse arrows of motion.
We summarize the formal and functional differences between entropy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:
Maximal SpaceEntropy = Minimal Form=body Vs Maximal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension=head
For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension.
The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate information, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.
And yet in a paradoxical Universe, as it happens the increasing speed of the mindelements to conform a still mindmapping, suddenly become locked into that still linguistic view, as a hurricane stops in its zerocenter. So from motion to form, the Universe stops in a single timequanta.
Look back at the previous graph. What is the main difference between lineal and cyclical ðime? Obviously that cyclical ðime is bidimensional and it carries ‘form’, information both in its form and the frequency of its cycles. So the holographic principle becomes solved by accepting cyclical ðime.
Yet if ðime has the dimension of height to complete a circle, we must redefine the classic 4 dimensions of ðime§pace, as 2 dominant in Ðime§pace, height and length, which creates a bidimensional circle (to which ad the frequency of the cycle, or pure dimension of ðime), and those dominate in ðime§pace, which has now 2 dimensions, length and width.
And so because only beings with the same number of dimensions can transform into each other, we just have discovered an important conundrum of modern physics – how the Universe is built through the…
The Universe is made of two substances spatial entropy and informative ðime cycles/clocks. We can see it with motion as entropy and ðime or as fixed forms, as §pace and form. We can see it as a single reality, as §pace and ðime, or as a multiple quanta, as entropy≈expansive motion and imploding form.
The exact definitions of reality are thus in terms of two poles, absolute lineal §pace seen as distance and absolute form:
Pure Spacedistance (not perceivable) with motion (entropy) < Max. entropy§pace x Min. Form (energy) + Max. Form with Min. §paceentropy (Information) > Pure ðimeform (cyclical)
Since pure distance§pace (vacuum) has no form and it is not perceivable, and pure form (cyclical, inward clocks) do NOT communicate with us and cannot be perceived. So those two limits when combined gives us energy (dominant in motion but with form to be perceived) and information (dominant in form but with motion to be perceived).
This duality implies difficult choices of wording as onedimensional huminds reject ambiguity embedded in reality. We shall in principle consider the word ‘dimension’ for both ðime and §pace:
– All states of relative motion ‘ðime states’ or ‘ðime ages’. And call its study diachronic studies.
– All states of relative form ‘§pace topologies’ or ‘§pace organs’. And call its study synchronic studies.
And so conclude that ðime has three dimensions≈ages≈functions symmetric to the three dimensions≈forms of §pace.
Let us see how those three dimensions of ðime and three of §pace appear now, being aware it is impossible not to handle a certain ambiguity in the terminology dragged for millennia of misunderstanding those words; starting from the simple truth that from 1 ðime§pace comes two ðime and §pace, and from two comes three. So we start with two, focusing now in the ‘form of ðime cycles and planes of lineal §pace’.
Thus we can start studying beings of one dimension of space and one dimension of timemotion, simultaneously. As reality requires that for each dimension of space we perceive one of time. And beings with a basic typology of lines, limbs and potential fields, $, since the line is the shortest distance between points, with spherical ‘particleheads’ on top, made of many timespace ‘clockscycles’ of information; since the sphere stores maximal form in minimal space.
It allow us to construct bidimensional (minimal beings) mimic in all type of species, which go on constructing the reproductive equations of a bidimensional world of spacetime.
It is an astounding symmetry, which makes each lineal motion, potentially perceived as a line of distance, which it traces as a limb/field in motion.
It also means that to each topology in space, corresponds a function in time, and so we double the dimensions of reality, making a clear correspondence between the 3 topologies of space and the 3 functions in time of all beings:
In the graph we see those motions as pure topological forms and pure time motions, below, and above how they combine their function=form and ensemble into ternary systems of spacetime, with 3 space +3 time dimensions, which are the basic all pervading system of reality, with a formal singularitylike particle/head gauging information, a field/limb, spacelike formless lineal or planar surface of entropic motion that moves the bodyparticle and an intermediate, hyperbolic vital bodywave that iterates the system.
So the scalar structure of the Universe, and its three modes of timespace change are the 2 fundamental advances needed in philosophy of timechange to fully understand and resolve the pending questions of most sciences.
This ternary spacetime, form with motion system of 3s≈3t dimensions is the key structure unveiled by the seeming ‘innocent’ paradox of Galileo.
As physicists didn’t care that much for the logic behind relativity of motion, they didn’t find this basic insight of the duality of spatial forms and time motions, and so they got stuck with 3 dimensions of space, and one dimension of time only. And yet because the 3 different topological motions of time are real, they ensemble all beings of reality:
 Expansive entropy that disorders and erases information, simplifying system back to its ‘less evolved past’, and so we shall call pastentropy, which is flat or lineal as all fast moving ‘planes’, since those are the geometries with shorter=faster distances.
 Repetitive, hyperbolic bodywaves that seem not to change, and so we shall call relative present energy
 Implosive, spherical particleshead, as the sphere stores maximal information in less space, with accelerated timeclocks, which we shall call future, as they are the future logic systems that guide the whole and store the gauging paths of the whole system.
RECAP
St¡ence is ultimately concerned with the existence of beings. How they are generated, live and die, regardless of which are its particular nature – those are the foundational questions, which as Leibniz put it, must have answers related to its ultimate substances:
Those substances are the energy and information of the being, product of the combination of its motions and forms, which we call ‘spaceentropylineal motion’ and ‘timeformcyclical motion’; as form is also a motion, albeit cyclical and hence perceived without detail by a slow observer as cyclical form.
In nonabrahamic ‘tribal, historic religions’, where God is a preaxialrational age wor(l)d to signify the subconscious collective of a tribe, God was always considered the ‘form’ or ‘information’ that moulded as ‘logos’, the entropic lineal motions with no form, which where the first ‘existential manifestation of the being’.
To exist therefore it was required that from the immortal lineal motions and cyclical forms of the Universe, a ‘drop of yin’ felt into yang and vice versa. And this is the first moment of creation, when entropy, lineal motion acquires its first curvature of time; or when time, the first cyclical form, breaks its closed nature and emits a wave of communication that resembles its form.
III. TRINITY: THE GENERATOR
Creation of topological, functional, ‘organic’ ðime§pace beings.
‘Γao (the Γenerator) gives birth to yinform and (yang), motion.
Both merge into Energy (Qi), the source of all creation.’ Γao ðœ. On Γ: the Function of existence: 1D form+2D motion = 3D: energy
‘Shiva≈motion+Visnu≈information combine to create the ∞ beings≈hairs of Brahma”
Eastern philosophies, on the 3 first arrows of ðime and its ∞ ∆scales of §pace (expanded in the deepest forms of thought – Upanishads, to the 4th of entropy, death and 5th, creative form, language).
The three arrows of ðime as choices of future, which each system compound in simultaneous §pace of organs that perform the three arrowsfunctions, entropy, reproduction and information. What they mean is simple: systems can always choose to use one of the three arrows and perform functions with its symmetric organs. So you can move with your entropic limbs, you can reproduce yourself with your body, or reproduce your cells with the food you eat, or you can think, perceive, inform yourself, guide the system with your head.
The graph shows some of the astounding variations of this simple theme, from the three ages of life each one dominant in a youngentropic, maturereproductive, oldinformative arrow, to the complementarity particlewave of quantum physics moving over an entropic field, to the three horizons of evolution of organisms, which mimic the ages of the individual species; as they grow in information towards a third age; will become the fundamental cause and explanation of most events of reality, which is ‘simple, (iterative) and not malicious’ (Einstein). Since from 1, ðime comes 2, ðime and §pace, yin and yang, and from 2 comes 3 – the 3 arrows of ðime and its 3 topological symmetries in §pace – and from 3 the ∞ beings.
In the graph, relative, local PastEntropy and futureinformation,  and 0 combine for any system finite in §pace and ðime duration, into infinite fractal Øbeings with a bodywave ‘momentum’; integrated along the whole world cycle of its exi=st¡ence into energy, which is conserved as a zero sum, when the cycle is closed.
This simple conceptual sentence resumes the interaction of the 3 arrows of ðime in physics, upgrading conceptually the conservation principles and Noether’s theorem (awesome math, blurred thought, as usual in humans without the right understanding of the 3 arrows of ðime).
This ternary nature of all systems, which extend in three scales of 5D, have three topological forms of space and live three ages off time, is resumed in the Fractal generator of spacetime beings (GST also):
Γœ: ∆1 ≤≥$pe (pastlineal fields/limbs) ≤≥ ∆º:ST (Present hyperbolic body/waves) ≤≥ Tiƒ (future informative cyclical particlesheads)>∆+1
The symbols of that equation belong to nonaristotelian logic, based in three arrows of timespace that come together to create the being. And as we will constantly repeat them, and use them to write equations that describe systems in time, space and scale, we might as well explain them in this tiny nutshell foreword:
SCALES: ∆ is the symbol of the fifth dimension of scales. So a system extends through three such scales, ∆1, the atomic/cellular scale, ∆º, the organic, thermodynamic scale and ∆+1 the world where the system exists or gravitational, ecosystemic scale.
TOPOLOGIES: $pe means exactly what the letters mean: not dollars but lineal space, entropy (S is the symbol for entropy in physics, e the letter) AND past, as the limbs fields are the less evolved part of the being. ST means preSenT in time and a spacetime bodywave which combines both entropic space and informative time, putting it together so it can reproduce the system. Tƒ means temporal future information, and the head/particles that store it and relate to the ∆+1 world, as they perform their program of survival, their actions of absorption and emission of entropy, energy and information for its three parts.
FEEDBACK DYNAMIC FLOWS: And so we use simple operandi symbols to define the dynamic flow between those three parts:
< which expresses an informative system • increasing its spatial entropy, <; so it is the arrow of entropy events
> means an entropic system becoming more information, so it is the inverse, informative flow/arrow.
= means a repetitive, hence seemingly non changing present, reproductive event performed mostly by conjunction of entropymotion and form. And so we can build with those simple elements all the systems of nature, and describe synoptically all its parts and events.
From the perspective of the mind though those events have a vital organic purpose as we shall see, unveiling a program of survival of any entity of reality. THEY are organised as ‘actions’ of spacetime, which come together into social networks, creating a fractal Universe that reproduces coexisting super organisms across several scales of size (packed together under the generic term of the fifth dimension).
We shall explain such real Universe, and the systems it creates along the 3 scales of physical systems, the quantumatomic thermodynamic and gravitational, larger scales.
Thus the formal way to define the Universe in terms of information is this: ‘The universe is a ternary, topological fractal selfreplicating program, which constantly imprints and erases organic structures in 10 dimensional motions of spacetime’.
This is the Universe in a nutshell, written in one page of text and one page of drawings:
As we have really include it all, the nutshell, a seed of information, is dense, but as we ‘develop the seed’ in growing iterative layers of information – the way the Universe reproduces its fractal forms, this ‘ugly’ dense seed will flourish into the infinite species of reality.
In the graph, the ‘borders’ of balance between the present energy system and its entropic past and future vortex of mindformstillness. We can further divide the present STwave into its two components, 1Dlineal motion and 3Dcyclical form, which act as the frontiers with the entropic, scattering, dissolving and still informative mental wholeness:
In the graph a complex depiction of the 5 Dimensions of spacetime:
3 of them, 1D: lineal motion/distance, 3D: bodywaves of iterative energy (motion x form), and 1D: cyclical clocks can be considered ‘simultaneous states’ as they can be ordered in spatial organisms, and coexist in a single present plane of reality, since they are balanced, stable: the wave is a steady state, the line and the cycle inverse in properties, which balance each other.
2 of them belong to the scalar dimensions and have ‘scattering=entropic expansive properties’ (4D), which therefore dissolve and erase the 1, 2, 3D balanced states; or inversely are vortices of Time, which implode and hence final also ‘disappear’ from the observable present spacetime ternary system. So they are pure expansive 4D ∑ (microtime cycles) vs. 5D macrospace/mind dimensions as they are disconnected from the present being; initiating the scalar travel of all super organisms we call a world cycle of life and death.
The duality of space vs. time perception.
All this can be further explored now that we have some basic understanding of the dimensions of reality when we compare the ternary physical dimensions of time (entropic, decelerating motions, steady motions and accelerated motions) vs. those ternary dimensions in space (distance, line; area, vortex; volume, spatial growth).
In space, the dimensions seem to us in an easy hierarchical system of growth, 2D lines if we consider them waves of NonE fractal points with a 01 unit circle dimension for each point), 2D areas and 3 D volumes, but in time the 3 arrows depart from 1D steady state motion and can be considered as opposite directions, when volumes of space grow, through the scattering arrow of entropy diminishing its speed, vs. the acceleration of speed that diminishes space as the system collapses into a singularity:
So the 3D of classic space, ‘volume’ actually belongs to the entropic arrow of decelerating time that creates spacevolume, v. the opposite arrow of imploding time vortices that diminish space volume and increases speed, VxR=k
So what seems in space a natural growth of volume in space, in time has a different order:
Entropic ≈decelerating volume < steady state ≈ distancemotion > Informative, cyclical area ≈ accelerated motion.
This different ‘order’ of dimensions when perceived in simultaneous space and cyclical time is the main dislocation in the way the mind perceives both (which is sorely painful when we consider the order of a world cycle, always starting in the ∆1 scale of maximal information to decline as it grows and reproduces into less perfect, more entropic volumes of iterative forms that finally decline and die in the arrow of entropy; which the mind that has a SPATIALVOLUME INCLINED nature of evergrowth, does not understand).
13 Dimensions of present and 4th dimension of death in a single plane.
It is then when we enter into the ‘known dimensions’ used by ‘science’ – though without the mirror symmetry that makes us understand them as spatial forms vs. temporal motions.
In that single plane the being, which acquired its maximal perfection as form of information in its seedgeneticmemeticpropheticquantum particle state (biologic, sociologic, physical systems) will now try to evolve further into its ∆+1 social world. But there mostly will play a shorter game of existence (in a relative slower time speed) called life that ends in the fourth dimension, entropic death, as hardly any form of reality is able to keep ascending the scales of the fifth dimension.
So basically huminds fearing the fourth dimension (or loving it in the case of physicists whose worldly profession is to make entropic weapons, and hence have created multiple entropyonly theories of reality), consider only the 3 ages≈spatial dimensions of topological beings but without the proper analysis of its S=t symmetries do not fully grasp its two fundamental structures a super organism in simultaneous space made of lineal limbs/potentials < Øreproductive bodywaves>Oparticles heads, and its 3 ages of life, as the order in simultaneous space of those 3 systems is different from its wordlcycle order; as the reproductive bodywave is ‘between the lineal limbfields (1D) and its ‘coiling into a cyclical motion (2D particlehead).
It is then selfevident that the order of those 3 present dimensions, lineal motion, cyclical motion and wavelike motion is multiple giving birth to many different events and formal organisms. And from this realisation comes the big question about the 4D entropy and inverse 0D generational dimensions: can we invert their order?
So most systems have its maximal form in the seed o1 temporal state. Even if ALL minds WOULD LIKE THE order to be the opposite and grow always in information without death and entropy, which IS NOT what we observe in the real world.
main order in time is the world cycle, which unfortunately starts in the lower scale of faster time speed, which becomes ordered till emerging in the upper scale, but then is all going down, into the 4th dimension of death… So the arrow of entropy reigns in each of the scales alone, but the arrow of information BETWEEN SCALES IN THE 05 CYCLE, alpha and omega of all those existences.
Its study is the fundamental form of knowledge possible in the Universe. But we say all time motions have a spatial symmetric form. What is the symmetric form in space of the world cycle of time? The super organism, the fundamental simultaneous form of reality. Below we show that symmetry for a human being.
How much depth is acquired when we have the whole set of 5D to study the different realities can be shown indeed in the next graph, where the simplified view of a human being a a circlehead, wavebody and linelimbs now acquires a much detailed analysis:
In the graph, the human being in simultaneous space is:
 “A topological set of 3 adjacent noneuclidean, fractal physiological networks, connected to organs with $entropicdigestive, movinglimbic, ðinformativesensorial, mental and STreproductiveblood functions.
 ∆±1: All of them made of ∆1 ‘biological fractal points=cells’ connected in social groups by those ternary networks that create a T.œ, a Timespace super organism, the fundamental particle of the Universe.
This definition of a man, the reader should not be surprised, uses exactly the same terminology we use to describe any timespace organism of the Universe, from the atom to the galaxy. Because we are all made of the same elements and its laws. We have used a mixture of geometric and biologic terms, from mathematical and verbal languages, to describe it.
But we do NEED a new formalism to put together those ‘Dimensional isomorphic=equal’ properties, and that is the origin of the Disomorphic method or organic method of understanding used in this blog to put in correspondence all systems of reality illustrated in the lower ‘logic equation’, which describes those physiological networks by its ‘spacetime functions.
Of those laws the most important by far is the ‘symmetry’ between simultaneous space view and temporal moving view – the essence of the duality of the Galilean paradox. All what we see mentally in simultaneous space is actually moving in time.
And that means that any super organism in space will be tracing a world cycle in time, of life and death, a zerosum cycle between birth and extinction.
In the right we show how such systems evolve in time, through 3 ages dominated by each of those networks, the young limbic age, the reproductive classic age and the old informative age that ends in deathdissolution.
And we have illustrated them with ‘artistic images’ of the 3 ages of the next ∆+1 scale, the slower timespan of a civilisation, the greek Iron age, with its epic, lineal kuroi art, mature classic balanced age and informative hellenistic angst age, before war killed the civilisation.
And below we have used the simplest symbols of 5D logic to show those flows of time, which we repeat again:
< is the intuitive symbol of entropic, relative past devolving expansion
≈ of present relative balanced motion
> of informative implosion into a more evolved tighter network with faster time cycles.
The problem of death.
NOW I AM NOT going to lie to you. The problem of those dimensions from a philosophical pov, is that they go in decline, after a first impetu, when the being emerges from a lower ∆1 scale of seed, particle, plasma, DNA or prophetic state (different povs on ‘languages’ of creation, the 5Dimension of reality), it all goes down in existence, till the entropic, red dead, even for light born in the blue range of giant stars, at high frequency, going down, expanding its space, dying in red between galaxies…
So deal with it, your best times from the perspective of information, and creative reproduction were before you were born, written in the genetic scale.
Can you deal with it? If it is an emotional problem I won’t help you. Go to church. We shall also deal with seminal prophets, the 5th dimension of mindinformation of a religious subconscious collective mind of civilisations and prove you Christ is god, mathematically but he is not saving you, individual but mankind the species, for the time being, enough to state that you will die and your ego does not exist.
Then we can talk. As the seed emerges from the linguistic, creative fifth dimension of its genes, memes, quantum numbers, colours or whatever ‘form’ it acquires in its world cycle of ‘exist¡ence,’ as an entity of energy x information of a given stience scale of reality, it perceives in its mirror language, and moves.
It does create the second dimension of motion, the young age…
So we can write the 3 ages of life in a simple stream of <≈> flows of actions, young motions, reproductive processes and informative old behaviour that reflect the 3 ages.
To notice then we use as symbols of those 3 ages the symmetric ‘inversions’ of the symbols for Space>Past, Temporal information> Future time, and timespace>PreSenT.
Now, we ‘are talking’, pedantic T.œ Science, so early because i know memorial scholar and students of memorial scholarship have a huge ego and need to feel things are complicated, don’t like the dictum of Einstein ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’ and think of course if they can write hermitian matrix with operators, in quantum algebra they must really now what is all about (: Lol. You are children of thought…
Because you depart from false principles, so you have built a bizarre, baroque, complicated and convoluted image of reality which has shaky foundations, filled with errors, reason why despite so much complexity in the details, when it comes to first principles, with lineal single entropic arrow of times you can only ‘think’ the Universe was born in a bigbang explosion of an infinite dense point, who nobody knows what was doing there, how and why.
This simplicity in the understanding of timespace arrows is then what we need to correct first. Because as it happens with Abrahamic religions, never mind your IQ if you start with a brainwashed by Torah and Koranical mantras, you will only utter nonsenses when talking of the first principles.
On the other hand when you start without error, on the real substances of reality, real space and real time (‘real’ yes must be repeated many time so you get it – languages are distorted mirrors of the mind and experimental facts come first, ‘reality is GOD’ – the mind only its mirror), you can progress very fast to the whys, to the big picture of the forest. And then also if you wish so you can go by iteration, repetition and recombination, modulation, variation, of those elements explain each detail of each tree.
So as you see departing from something so simple as the 5Dimensions of scalar spacetime, we are able to explain you just in our 5th page, the entire meaning of your existence as a timespace being, both as an individual and as part of a larger, slower organism, which lives as all civilisations tabulated in our historic study, 10 x 80 years, that is 10 slower generations, and inversely an insect of the lower scale lives ad maximal 8 years (antqueen), but calculates 10 times faster….
So with more complexity, both in its spatial formal and temporal motion symmetry, suddenly an astounding number of ignored results in all sciences will keep cropping, as we are going to show you that ALL can be known and explain within the limits of our mindmirror languages put on focus with the proper philosophy of ‘stience’ as the Universe is indeed made of spacetime organisms, seen as motions of the 5 Dimensions of time.
The third duality of the Galilean paradox: biased perception of those scales.
Accelerated time clocks in smaller scales are perceived as hyperbolic space ‘curvatures’ by the slower human mind’s space
The point then is measured externally by its angular momentum or mass, or external perception of its t/s density, which then as it moves with a speed s/t give us its force as a single Unit with 3 D, s/t x t/s =1.
It must be noticed the main error of classic physics – to consider the first dimension that of the line of distance, ignoring the emergence of a fractal point with inner dimensions, a seed of information, from the ∆+1 plane.
REDUCTIONISM AND PARALOGIC thought in creationist verbal theories.
We shall also evolve and complete and regain verbal thought as a meaningful language mirror of reality. On one side by applying topological linguistics to the findings of Humboldt (cultures reflected in the syntax of languages) and establish the ∆st basis of ternary universal grammar, reflection of reality.
So with verbal languages its ternary syntax is immediate:
5D: Name (subject: Knot of form: point) < 123D: verb: iterative action > 4D: Entropic object.
So the 3 verbs, pastpresent and future, between the mindsubject (5D0 and the entropic object it uses through the verb action define the 5 Dimensional isomorphisms of the languagemirror of logic thought that will therefore describe super organisms in 5D worldcycles s
The problem of course of creationist theories is that they exclude all other languages and all other properties which are NOT easily explained with a limited mind mirror – and all mind languages are limited because they CANNOT fit otherwise without ‘reducing dimensions’ the whole and its motions into an infinitesimal mind.
Further on as Kant realized, minds are synoptic and search always for an ultimate mirror image of the whole – the word God in religion, the final equation or God’s bigbang particle in mathematical physics – or the ego in the selfie, isolated humans of the present entropic age of history:
All this said we must conclude that a single spacetime continuum and its ‘naive realism’ – the philosophy of science of physics – is just mathematical reductionism… what we see is what it is, but only if its properties can be reduced to mathematical equations, which exclude obviously all other vital, artistic, sensorial languages and the properties they describe.
Further on, as digital though is the language we use to translate measures with machines, which speak that language better than we, verbal beings – it has caused a growing despise of life and worship of machines, the idology of today, our new religion.
Yet this philosophy is both a limited maya of the mechanical mindsenses, and an egotrip of the first scientists like Kepler, who said ‘God was a clocker that waited 500o years to find an intelligence like his’…
Such view completely DISREGARDS, the obvious first substances of reality we see experimentally, time clocks and vital spaces, broken by the membranes that divide and evolve those vital spaces into timespace organisms. It might please the simpleton mind, which reduces all what he sees, as the first men though the valley and tribe inhabiting its sacred land were God and all what existed.
But if you want to make serious science you must expand that view, first to understand its substances (or do you see numbers around when putting a microscope on space); and then due to the obvious experimental scalar nature of reality, understand the interaction between scales of parts and wholes that make it all organic.
This of course can only be made with the synoptic mindmirrors of man, logic time, and its verbal and mathematical languages, we shall evolve in this blog to better focus the reality of space and time. But always being conscious that no language gives us all the properties of spacetime, which we must ‘explore a priori’ trying to find its logic, which as Augustine put it is ‘of a higher order than man’.
‘God is the seer of time he said’,hence time was above God, and his logic was above man’s aristotelian lineal thought – which is truth, so we shall explore the logic of a Universe built with 5 timespace dimensions, its logic and interactions first.
Now, the graphs illustrate those dimensions in terms of geometry, the spatial dominant form of mental human languages which observe space and we will upgrade as nobody has done since… Lobachevski (: but with the perspective that mathematics while being the most efficient mind mirror of the properties of spacetime, is NOT the substance of the Universe, and so only by properly chaining our philosophy of science from the present platonism, or the equivalent creationism of religions to the Leibnizian concept of a relational spacetime Universe, of which we are all made, we shall make sense of it.
This said, mathematics will still be considered the best mirror to study the dimensions of spacetime, and its algebraic symmetries, group varieties, and analytical motions… Where operations will be the fundamental element to express those motions and symmetries.
Regarding the mirror languages that express those dimensions, as the most useful is mathematics – NOT the substance of reality, which is space and time, but its best mirror, the 5 mathematical operations that define most often those dimensions are as follows:
1D and 2 D  and O lineal and cyclical bidimensional spacetimes are ‘SUMS of NUMBERS’, each one a social being, most likely in its perfect form prime polygons, which become indistinguishable cyclical points, with its capacity to reproduce internally vertex:
Prime polygons able to multiply internally, invaginating the vital space till creating a mirror image, the mindsingularity in its center, are the most indistinguishable groups of points, the geometric equivalent to sequential, temporal numbers. As all other numbers can be a product of primes – the most efficient social configurations, the best mirrorimage of the social growth of ‘lineal and cyclical points’ are numbers and its social sums.
3rdD: REproductION. As the hidden wisdom of the verbal language understands the Product is the essential algebraic operation of the second §‡ dimension of iterative O x  = Ø combinations of the being.
4D: Entropy, Derivatives which divide a whole till finding its ‘finitesimal indivisible quanta’ are the natural operation of ‘Space’ in the fourth dimension as it finds that minimal ∆1 form. On the other hand, contrary to belief, polynomials, power laws ARE the time operation of decay and death of inverse exponential growth – as exponential growth do not exist since the energy to feed reproduction is limited but departing from a huge number of ∆1 wholes it is quite easy to produce a massive decay, reason why negative exponentials are used in all decay functions.
5D: social evolution. It follows that the exact inverse operations of 4D will be those of the 5th dimension of social growth: integrals in space of ∆1 quanta, and logarithmic FUNCTIONs in time, which are used for logistic equations of growth.
So we have found as we shall constantly do a Disomorphic (Dimensional isomorphism=equality) correspondence that carries the 5 Dimensions into the 5 mirror algebraic operations and its inverse (operandi in Latin also used as a synonymous in our attempt to create a slightly different jargon for common terms of ‘science’ when doing ‘stience’).
Thus we can reduce the mathematical language operations, its knots and bolts to the 5 Dimensions of reality:
01th dimension (o1 unit cicle in probabilistic temporal terms as expressed in the linguistic mirror of mathematics): the generative cycle which brings finitesimal parts into an integral and defines also the Unit of NonEuclidean mathematics, a fractal point that grows in information as we come closer to it, allowing infinite parallels to cross.
Now this 01th dimension will be the main theme of the blog, because it is the less understood – we didn’t even consider it in classic ‘science’ (as opposed to ‘stience’, science of spacetime beings’) before.
We have use for it the yellow color in the previous graph… so you can see the flow of colours, though more properly should be a blue… the birth of colours in the highest, shortest frequency, and then go down to end in red.
The 01th dimension is closely related though to the fifth dimension of ‘growth in planes of existence’ of the Universe. And when we study the formalism of NonEuclidean mathematics we shall see that the first notion/postulate of Euclid, DEFINITION of a point with nobreath and its 5th postulate (points and parallels) are essentially the same concept that must be reformed.
So the 1ST postulate shows in function and motion the evolution of finitesimals, ∑∆1 into wholes, ∆o ‘first units’ of the new social evolution in the 1∞ plane, as an ∆beings which will evolve socially in an external ∆+1 world.
5th dimension: the world, and by extension the whole range of scales.
ONCE THE O1TH emerges, and further develops its 3D ensemble of lineal moving limbs/fields, Oparticles/heads and Øhyperbolic body waves, the 123 ensemble will exist in an outer 5D world, part of an infinite Universe.
The 5th dimension is the sum of all the infinite scales of the Universe, which going upwards will be called the 5th dimension of social evolution (biological view), integral, polynomial growth (Mathematical, physical view), which convert each new o1 temporal unit circle of a finitesimal in a first 1 of a new 1∞ scale till creating a new super organism.
The real order of absolute time, being natural to the fact that for a larger whole to appear the 01 ∆1 finitesimal one, must exist first.
Hence the 01th dimension of generation before birth; of a pure seed of information is the beginning of all games of existence.
And we can observe this 01TH point in terms of information either as a seed or as a linguistic mind born to order an external territory.
The generator equation.
So WE write the Generator Equation, a symbolic equation that represented all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time and its spacetime combinations, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:
Γ. Generator: Toroid $p(limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ∑∏(exi) (repetitive wavesbodies) > Spherical ðƒ (head Particles)
Since limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.
Or as ChengTzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yangline of energy and the yininformation, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.
(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)
So I could classify all the different spacetime beings made with the 3 topological formal motions of the Generator.
Since Nature ‘pegs’ those 3 forms & functions, which put together create the underlying structure of all systems of reality, both physical and biological, as all combined the ternary elements of the generator equation, either in sequential time orders (entropic youth, reproductive maturity, 3rd informative old age) or simultaneous, spatial organisms:
It is clear that Informative Time, It, is far more important, as a cycle has more dimensions, more length, and stores lines inside. So the Time, informative system (the head/particle) controls the line, the energy/limbs/fields systems. And all systems had one on top or in the place where information is more available to them. The plant has its ‘head in the roots’ that absorb chemical information; the galaxy in the black hole in its center that absorbs gravitational information, the human in its head that sees light information, inverse to the plants. And each one creates a different world map with it – a monad.
Those cyclical ðƒparticles/heads are cyclical precisely because the sphere is the form that stores more information.
It does not matter so much that forms become ever more complex, as topological knots become convoluted, but the functions of those networks remain. They become the 3 ‘physiological networks of all systems’, again described by the Generator equation:
$p; Digestiveenergetic network of NonAE points < ∑∏: reproductive, ‘blood’ networks > Informative, nervous networks: ðƒ
So now with those basic clarifications we can study through its 10 isomorphisms some of the key elements of those physical systems in 5D spacetime.
immortal Universe: a zero sum that conserves its Se<≈>ðƒ elements. Entropy (S∂)<cc:Energy>Mass (ðiƒ)
Now, the easiest way to consider each of the 3
Finally two important facts to notice on those 5D spacetime generator equations, to end this introduction:
As 5D and time are symmetries that increase information and decrease entropy contrary to belief the universe does warp energy into form and so it dies, since 2 symmetries (time cycles and 5D evolution) increase form, and only one (space motions) decrease it.
An example is the duration of life and death:
While the lifeinformationevolution arrow lasts its maximal timespace quanta warping the being in a point of space for ‘very long’, the arrow of death
entropy last a single quantum of timespace, exploding in that ‘microtime’ the entity in maximal space (i.e. bigbang microtime, antiparticle erasing.)
Yet the sum of both: ∑ ‘Max. T. x Min. S’ + ‘Max. S x Min. T’ is a zero sum for the total 5D spacetime of the Universe.
So the Universe is conserved, BECAUSE DEATH erases both 5D Times – the worldcycle of information AND the social evolution of the being.
Further on since the Universe is made of formal motions it is immortal and motion never ceases – only reverses its arrow from information to entropy in the act of death (or vice versa as Mehaute proved in chemical processes, in the creation of crystals) the Universe is immortal. From this fact it comes both the Absolute relativity of spacetime in each scale, which merely inverts its arrows and the relative infinity of motions in the 5^{th} dimension, which merely ‘wobble’ up an down. And from this absolute relativity derives the isotropy and isomorphism of both, from where it derives in the conservation principles of Physics:
Conservation of lineal momentum and kinetic energy vs. Conservation Tƒ: angular momentum and potential energy, which in most events of physical measure derives in the laws of least action (Hamiltonian ≈ Lagrangian > ∂H=0; steady points etc.
Γ. The Generator of physical systems and its 5D ST (anti)symmetries:
The Generator of Universal Planes, Time states and Space symmetries for all physical systems is a simple equation that resumes the spatial parts, temporal ages and coexisting 3 scales in which physical systems develop its cyclical spacetime action – the events and motions in space, physicists study:
∆≤3:SP (young, toroid gas, field)≤≥ST(present, iterative, liquid, boson wave)≤≥Tƒ(future, informative crystal/fermion)
The fundamental ‘Generator equation’ leads to the first differentiation of physical spacetime systems in 3 5D planes according to the ternary principle:
 ∆_{1 }Electromagnetic, quantum plane: Sefield<STwave<Tƒparticle; whose ternary asymmetry in space creates the atom.
 ∆Thermodynamic plane: Segas<STliquid>Tƒcrystal; whose ternary asymmetry in space create geological planets.
 ∆+1 Gravitational, cosmological plane of the galaxy: SE (strangelet halo); ST (udquark stars), and Tƒ (top quark black holes), whose ternary antisymmetry in space creates the 3 galactic regions.
 Thus the most important ‘5D symmetry’ is the social growth of mass in 3 families of particles, the parts of galactic wholes (the 3 families of cosmic bodies); of which there growing but not definitive evidence despite the theoretical soundness of the model, studied in the previous Post (Galaxies).
Those 3 ternary differentiations of the 3 Q1>T>G+1 scales of matter (fieldwavesparticles; gasliquidsolid; ud, strangelet, top quark hole regions of the galaxy) harmonizes the Universe.
The detailed analysis through the 10 isomorphisms 5 D fractal spacetime cycles generate, of each of the parts of those equations 3 $E<>∑∏≤>ðƒ regions/ ages/planes of 5D physical systems truly resolves the whys and gives an architectonic perfect structure to the science of physics.
The 3 forms of space and the 3 motions of time.
So we can write a general equation, which is another ‘point of view’ on the ternary symmetry of the Universe, this time in terms of physical states of matter, for the ‘smallest quantum world’ and the ‘larger’ thermodynamic world of matter:
$p (gas, field spatial decelerating state) < ∑∏ (waveliquid steady spacetime) > ðƒ (ParticleSolid, accelerated state).
And yet, most people will consider that a gas moves faster than a particle. Yes, indeed, externally, but we are talking here of the internal world of the particle, its vortex, its ‘hurricane’ of forces that creates it. Because the mind ‘fixes cyclical vortices’ of forces, masses and charges into a ‘form’. So we seem solid a very fast turning wheel, but it is made of turning spooks.
So the ambivalences of reality ARE ambivalences between the mind perception of form and the moving realities behind them. All the pictures we have of masses and charges so vortices of accelerated motion, and this was expressed by Einstein in his illunderstood Principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and masses and accelerated motions. Soon of course physicists who have this astounding capacity to define correctly with mathematical equations reality and then misunderstand it conceptually forgot what Einstein said and got back to their ‘lineal particle’ mantra as the cause of mass (but of course will not with the exception of Einstein, inspired by Mach, always fond of philosophy, ‘ask’, us philosophers of science.)
So there is here a contradiction: a time vortex because occupies little space, when not seen in detail seems a fixed form. Yet it is faster and its function, because it is faster is to enclose and tighten as a membrane the vital space of lineal entropic motions that want to escape, ‘collaborating’ with the ⊗point mind at the center.
And this is the organic structure between the faster membrane and the central point of view that are in fact the ‘same being’, exploiting the entropic motions of its environment or territory. A shepherd does have a shepherd dog, which constantly moves faster than the sheep, the vital space they enclose. The dog is the time cycle, surrounding the vital sheep entropic energy, which the shepherd directs.
Now it is clear the difference between 5D astrophysics and the present state of ‘fantaphysics’, in which all can happen, all particles that are a mere mathematical equation must be searched for, as there are no rules, no understanding of the spacetime symmetries of the Universe, and its lifedeath arrows. Physicists ARE STILL ASKING, why there are antiparticles (the arrow of death of particles), why there are 3 families of mass (the ternary symmetry of 5D scales of particles), what is dark matter in the halo (the strange quark symmetry between particles and parts of the galaxy).
They do not have the slightest idea of why the universe is like it is, and so all ‘goes’, all can be searched for, including unfortunately nuclear experiments with strange quark matter and top stars (black holes) that can blow up the planet and accelerate its future purpose on the ∆+1 scale – to feed as mitochondria do on a cell, the reproduction of the heavier strange and top quark matter that rules through black holes and strange neutron stars the galaxy.
Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy.
A galaxy is a curved, fractal spacetime of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial Entropy and temporal information).
And to understand it, we NEED to fully grasp the symmetry between the 3 ∆±1 planes of existence of the physical system.
The generator equation and its ‘expressions’ of time travels.
So we can deduce easily from the Generator Equation the equation of the life ages, or ‘world cycle’, the fundamental cycle of the Universe, the alpha and Omega:
 œ1 (conception: 5th dimension of reproduction and social evolution) ∆º: Max. $p (energy, young age) > $p=ðƒ (Adulthoodreproductive age)> Max. ðƒ (old, informative 3rd age) << ∆2 (4th dimension of entropic age death)
The equation is another fundamental symmetry, from where an enormous number of facts of reality can be deduced.
A brief list of those ‘symmetries’ for physical, biological and social systems, starting by the Human world, which should be the center of any unification theory, based in the organic structure of the Universe, as man is the most perfect and better observed organism, and scales are all isomorphic so their size or location does not matter as physicists who pretend that the largest or smallest scales matter more than the human one, make us believe – on the contrary as their observation is scanty by reason of distance in time and space, they are plagued with interpretative errors.
III. Time§paœrganisms: ¡ts ωorldcycles
∆û$ð you are, ∆•st you shall become.’ Bible, on the ωorldcycle of ∃xi…st¡ence
All this said, the essence of the Universe is the SYMMETRY between space forms and time dimensions, expressed in the world cycle of existence, where the 5 Dimensions of the being seen in simultaneity form a super organism and seen in sequential time form a world cycle.
So we come to the fundamental element of reality, the fundamental particle, the super organism, œ, travelling through a life and death ‘worldcycle’ of existence, which is a travel through the fifth dimension that ends invariably in entropic death – but through the reproduction of the T.œ ensures the immortality of its ilogic form.
A reproductive universe of super organisms tracing worldcycles.
The knot of all knot of times cycles is the supœrganism, and the cycle of all cycles the world cycle, so all what we see is a game of supœrganisms and worldcycles: Universe ≈ ∑ð.œ (worldcycles of superganisms). And so we state:
‘The Universe is a fractal supœrganism that re≈produces and d=evolves in/form/ation’
Now the most important of those actions are the reproductive actions of information, which ensure the survival of the logic form beyond its demise. This is an automatic fact; systems that do not reproduce its form, its information, don’t last in time and don’t exist. So all systems have sequential worldcycles of discontinuous reproduction into similar beings.
It is also the mathematical definition of a fractal: a fractal has a generator equation that reproduces the system. We are merely studying the fractal generator of the Universe.
Systems are fractals, which as the Universe does, constantly reproduce information and they do so by traveling from a seminal to an organic scale of being. This travel is reproductive, and so all what we observe are waves of reproductive, seminal supœrganisms, performing a world cycle:
In the graph the obnoxious •singularities dedicated to reproduce actions that become formal motions iterated through the imprinting of ∆1 seeds of exi•st¡ence. Constant waves of form crossing scales of the fifth dimension up and down in reproductive cycles, with astounding fidelity replicate per in secula seculorum the ‘elements’ of a game, which is infinite in time and space and identical repetitions of the limited number of ‘selfs’.
And now, only now when everybody has long ago abandoned the web, because they expect reality to mold to the designs of humind membrains, with its minimalist notion of reality and its properties, which only can be expressed in maths, etc. etc. we shall deal with the great question, what is God, and the UNIVERSE.
MERELY AS THE GRAPH SHOWS, A REPRODUCTIVE FRACTAL, a constant orgasm of reproduction, a super organism, that is the purpose of it all.
It must be understood that the order of a world cycle of existence differs slightly from our classification of dimensions for the whole scenario, as the particlehead becomes in biological organisms dominant and could be in that sense considered the 3D element which guides the present 1D limbs/potentials and 3Dreproductive age, which is the middle on a world cycle. This fundamental difference which must be clarified requires also a thorough change of ‘naming’ in this blog, which I will carry on distinguish the Dimensions of time as ‘AGES’ to signify this difference. Thus in sequential ages, the mind/head particle plays the key role in the 3rd informative age, even if it is formed from birth as the 2nd topological dimension of the being (as the foetus does follow the general order and creates last the reproductive organs, mixture of the informative and limbic, moving elements of the being).
So the 2nd dimension of simultaneous angular momentum or particlehead of a present being dominates the 3rd age of the being prior to its entropic death. (And in some graphs and texts are wrongly qualified as 3rd ðage).
Travels through the fifth dimension.
For a dimension of spacetime to exist, an entity must be able to travel through it, while its spacetime parameters remains coinvariant.
In words of Klein, one of the discoverers of NonE Geometry:
‘A Geometry is the study of the (co)invariant properties of a space(time), under motions within itself’ (Klein).
Since it is precisely the coinvariance of both parameters what allows ‘species’ to travel through those scales and exchange energy and information through them without the system and the dimensions to ‘become unstable’.
So how we travel through the 5th dimension? Simply moving through it in the lifedeath cycle of existence:
Let us then define with those simple principles of existential beings its most important equation… the…
5≈3±1 ages of ðime§paœs
‘To be or not to be, that is the question’ Shakespeare, on the function of ðime§pace existence.
“For you are ∆ºst (of ðime§pace). And to ∇ûst you shall return.” Genesis, on the world cycle of ðime§pace existence.
‘ΓºΔ is the seer of ðime’ Saint Augustine; on the program of ðime§pace existence.
‘ðime§pace Energy is conserved in all zerosum ωorldcycles between birth and extinction in which a ðime§pace being transforms back and forth its entropy into information: Eω≈∫exi=st‘. Principle of Conservation of the 3 arrows of ðime§pace. Function of exi=st¡ence.
Sancho on the ωorldcycle of all ∆ºST beings
We can now switch analysis from the spatial, synchronous view of ðime§pace cycles/arrows as organic parts of systems, into the temporal, sequential order, as ðimeages of a world cycle of existence.
It must be noticed that humans tend to confuse (and so the error translates in many pages of our blogs, from an earlier age in which I tried to explain a simplified model of the world cycle):
Spatial Entropy (ab. $pe), pure disordered motion that expands §pace and dissolves form, and energy, when that motion starts to acquire form – so the equation of energy is a vector with a clear define direction in its motion, given by the form that moves.
Pure cyclical ðimelike form (third image) with information, which is forminaction, the intermediate state in which form acquires some motion to be transferred.
So, the worldcycle’s equation is as follows:
∆1: birth as a seed of pure form in a lower scale>which emerges in the new scales in a youth of entropic motions, which soon starts to learn how to ‘form’ entropy into energy growth > maturity when energy becomes shaped into information and the system reproduces > old age when information dominates till the system becomes still> entropy age or age of death, when the system returns to the ∆1 scale.
In the next graph, the Universe is a fractal of 3 topological motions of ðime§pace; Entropy, information and its combined momentums, which integrate into a closed, zero sum energetic worldcycle. Thus the study of the world cycles of ðime§pace and its 3 motions encodes the meaning of all ‘exi=st¡ences’ acronym for the fundamental equation or ‘generator of fractal ðime§pace, e x i = st, which each ‘stience’, studies by studying the ðime§pace beings of a certain scale of size of the fractal Universe:
Amazing as it seems the Universe as only 3 topological varieties, which therefore correspond to the previous 3 forms. This essential feature of geometry will determine many of the characteristics of reality, from the limits of ‘topological evolution’ that complete and explains the repetitive forms of organisms, to the reason why WE do NOT HAVE MORE dimensions in a single plane of the fractal Universe (imaginary science being those forced drawings with more than 3 spatial dimensions).
In the graph, using the minimum symbols of ∆@S≈T, < for a flow of entropy, > for a flow of information, ST for a present momentum, ∆, for the different scales of existence of the Universe, we map out its fundamental world cycles. The understanding of those world cycles, event in ðime, of a synchronous networks of clone beings or super organism in §pace, is the fundamental task of GST, the organic model of the fractal Universe.
The interesting fact of those worldcycles is that they are again the product of a sequential order of the 5 Dimensions, IN THIS CASE IN INVERSE FASHION, a fact we shall study with its deep philosophical implications in more detail.
∆generation (5D:SOCIAL Evolution FROM SEED to emergent form of present>lineal youth (1D)>reproductive maturity (2D)>informative 3rd age (3D)>entropic death back to the past (4D).
THOSE ARE THE 5 MOTIONSdimensionsarrows of timespace, now forming the lifedeath cycle of existence of all beings. Thus, without them and all its possible symmetric relationships, that allow us to extract all its meanings together we cannot make sense of any system,including physical systems, today observed mostly with a single one, ENTROPIC locomotions and its worldlines.
In that regard all physical and biological systems, ‘live and die’ as super organisms made of ∑atoms/cells that evolve through networks that transform Entropy into information (Life arrow) and then explode those information networks back into disconnected Entropy when they have exhausted it (death arrow) determines a sequential, existential lifedeath cycle invariant in all beings:
– ∆1>∆º: 01 Dimension: Generation: Birth as a seed of information that evolves through a phetus that feeds on energy, reproduces and finally emerges, realizing a first full trip through scales of the fifth dimension between its cellular/atomic/prophet and organic/crystal/cultural ‘whole’ emerging state.
Max. Motion x Min.Information: 2D youth of external, LINEAL motions with maximal activity of its SpLimbs/potential fields.
3D: Sp=ðƒ: Balanced, ‘classic’ age dominated by reproductive/communicative systems: hyperbolical waves and bodies.
The presentpresent, or steady state in the continuum is the longest, more efficient state and can be defined mathematically simply as Max. $p x ðƒ > S=T, since both equations are related, as 4×4>5×2>6×1, the point of balance between Entropy and information is thus the maximal point of the equation of existence, the mature, re=productive age when the species reproduces its Entropy and information fully in other zone of §pace and ðime.
It is the desirable age to ‘stay for ever’ the immortal top predator point of the wave of existence of any species or individual or universal, Consider the classic definition of beauty in art, as a balance of forms, and indeed, we see the harmony and proportionality between form and size, the key dimensions of lineal and cyclical space, is the definition of classic beauty. And we will return to that, when observing that all forms of art can be reduced to 3, lineal, epic, energetic art, classic art, and baroque, informative, with an excess of form.
3rd informative age/1ST Dimension. As time passes and the present evolves into the future information dominates, energy exhausts itself, motion stiffens and the being looses its ‘time mobility’, becoming formal, wrinkled, warped, till all motion seems to cease, but as motion NEVER ceases only in the virtual mind… it changes finally direction and abandons the present to dissolve in the relative past (a choice of our informative mind we by convention choose here as the future).
It will be the 4th Dimension, the age of entropy.
Now, in the larger analysis the ages of existence are obviously more as we have to count its two limits, the seminal age, ∆1>∆º and the death and dissolution, its inverse ∆º>∆1.
So we consider 5 AGES, common to all beings of Nature, in the 5th isomorphism common to all ‘exi=st¡ences’
Further on there is ‘§ixth’ unique age, very rare for those unique lives that REPEAT the process of creation of larger new scale of reality, i.e. prophets of social memes and religions, species who evolve into supœrganisms instead of being extinct; which ultimately explains why the Universe does have ∞ new scales of social organization.
As certain ‘perfect players of the game’, achieve not the ∆º<<∆1 entropic death but a new ‘life’ in the ∆+1 scale, as the singularity mindmirror of information, the particlepoint ’emerges as the seed of the ∆+1 social scale’ instead of dying (prophetic thought, which creates a civilisation; black hole formation as the mindventer of a galactic, ∆+1 scale for stars, etc.)
So, while we shall escape the miraculous emergence of a being after death into a higher social scale, in the third line, for the sake of comprehension we study 5 aging states: seed>youth>maturity>old age< extinction, to fully close a worldcycle.
Of those existential cycles, physicists consider that entropy objectively is the future as they see the organism of the Universe expanding, perhaps in a process of death as it was likely born of a seed of pure information that exploded into a reproductive radiation of ‘gala cells’ galaxies…
In the graph matter’s death by entropy: e=mcc happen in all scales. An interesting argument is to consider in which scale happens the bigbang, a local entropic background radiation measured locally for the galaxy, likely remnant of a quasar state. So ∆st favours after carefully studying data, that each galaxyatom or gala cell – perspectives comparing it with other scales of similar spacetime; has its bigbang cycle and the size of the wholeness of those galacells is not known, as we explain in our articles on cosmos and galaxies… so the hyperbolic ego of man has also reduced the size of the Universe and properly written its theory to look like he knows it all…
In any case whatever scale is the dark entropy underlying the galaxy at cosmic level, physical organisms and its 3 arrows of:
Entropy ≤c²(St)≥M(t) which form a physical system and can be broken in death, follow also the ternary ages of life.
So the creation of matter from plasma emerging s a whole also precedes its death in a birth of matter, which evolved socially the material system, and will at some time reproduce similar cycles of formation of matter. So while there is no end to the game of replications, the ego dies, and on top despite seeing timeinformation as the future, the mind is somehow orientated in inverse form to the entropy decadence and expansion of the body from youth to old age.
IV. 5D♥: SOCIAL ORGANIC EVOLUTION
∆+1: ‘Love each other as I have loved you’
Jesus, on the arrow of eusocial evolution, the sharing that merges a group of identical believers into a social god of a higher plane of existence
God is Love and God rules over all, Love organize all beings of the Universe that want to survive into future wholes, stronger than its parts… As each species must express, through its languages, actions and beliefs, the mandate of multiplying, reproducing and becoming together growing into larger wholes that feel equal and dance in parallel as one….
So love is not a spiritual concept but the main attractive force of Nature, expressed for each species as a cyclical conservative, repetitive path of spacetime.
The same beings, doing in parallel the same actions, makes emerge a new plane of existence of the fifth dimension, a new whole that stretches from potential past to potential future, the scales of existence of reality. Sancho on ∑•
∆: ‘A human being is part of a whole, called by us the Universe, a part limited in ðime and §pace. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings, as something separated from the rest–a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circles of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.’
Einstein, on the relationship between human dust of ðime§pace and the whole organic Universe.
We have seen how all what exists is a part of a cycle of time, seen as an open length or lineal motion but ultimately all can be built as pointlie cycles vibrating in different forms of motion, and gathering in herds of social motions, and topological forms/curved geometries. And when we assemble them together with the ternary principle based in the existence of ONLY THREE TOPOLOGIES IN both a 4 and 5D universe, we create ‘organic ensembles of beings’ with the functions/forms/arrows of time we all display in our actions of survival and existence.
As a result of this building up of fractal beings made of space quanta and timecycles we have a fractal scalar Universe, where smaller systems run faster cycles than larger ones:
The Universe is built with cyclical dimensions of ‘information’, form, by adding timecycles in different ways. So the first three dimensions can be considered generated by the motion of a point, vibrating up and down; or vibrating around a cycle, which then rotates as a cycle generating a sphere, or alternately rotates in a larger cycle creating a torus.
A Universe of ðimespace cycles perceived by… • Knots of time cycles
All what exist is cyclical time motions, sometimes perceived as flat lines or even as distances. But all is time and Time is cyclical. The socalled patterns of science are repetitions of events in ðime, due to a certain causality. If ðime were not cyclical, sciences would not exist. This little understood phenomena known to all civilizations before Galileo invented Lineal Time as a tool of measure of its cannonball shots and illunderstood the duality of motion vs. distance. As the earth both moves and doesn’t move at the same time, depending on our mental subjective or objective universal view.
So time cycles build dimensions of spacetime adding new larger slower time cycles, which is the origin of the five dimensions of the Universe, made of scales of time cycles of different speeds. Time cycles also build causality, which will allow us to define and predict scientifically all sciences and futures including the cycles of history.
And it gives the fractal organic, selfreproductive structure to the universe at large:
the Universe is an ‘organic’ fractal that reproduces in/form/ation in multiple scales of ‘size’ or ‘§paces’, with different speeds of ‘cyclical motions’ or ‘ðimes’. All its parts thus perform the same re=productive game.
Finally this ‘moving’ dimension of three dimensions (the lineal vibration, the cycle and the torus or sphere) adds a fifth scalar dimension by varying the size of the cycle (creating space) and the speed of the motion (accelerating the time cycle) according to a simple metric law:
Se (size in space) x Ti (speed of its time cycles) = Constant World
This allow smaller parts to run more information and code larger systems (genes code bodies, human memes code civilisations, small fast cycling black holes code galaxies). And larger systems with more energy to feed its inner smaller codes.
The metric equation of the fifth dimension. Spe operandi Tiƒ = Constant.
Indeed to make things more fun and complex, reality has added one more structural feature to reality, its scalar, fractal structure in smaller parts, we shall call ‘fractal points’ that organize through networks into larger forms we shall call wholes. So there is a fourth form of change: the social evolution of groups of fractal points into larger sizes and its dissolution or ‘death’ back to its smaller parts: ∆º±1
And that is all what is needed to explain the fractal, organic Universe of ∞ ðime§pace beings in perpetual, repetitive cyclical change.
The integration of all sciences under similar laws is the goal of Philosophy of Science achieved by the organic, fractal models of Systems Sciences or Complexity (ab. GST: General Systems Theory ), which considers a ‘scalar ðime§pace’ Universe in which each science studies a different scale of size in §pace, and speed of ðime of the Universe, which form together a new, 5th dimension of ðime§pace, whose metric equation, S x T = C, defines two inverse arrows of ‘ðime’, entropy and information:
In graph, the 3 main scales of the 5th dimension, with its changing speeds of ðime clocks (to) and §pace (Se), which remain coinvariant: S x T = k.
Since according to Klein’s definition, “a geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a ðime§pace, under transformations (read motions) within itself.”
And so for a 5th scalar dimension to exist, it is required to find a coinvariant equation of §pace and ðime parameters that do not vary as we ‘move’ through it. It is then easy to prove the existence of a 5th ðime§pace dimension with a simple ‘metric equation’: S x T = C, where S is the Spatial size (Spe) of the system related to its entropy content; T is the speed of the cyclical clocks of ðime of that scale of size, which carry the information of the system in the form and frequency of those cycles. And C is the constant, which balances any ðime§pace system, making possible its existence.
The fractal nature of space and the 3 arrows of cyclical time has a fundamental consequence:
Because the scalar Universe coexists in several scales of organisation together and it has three sequential arrows of time/topological organs of space, all systems in all scales made of a vital space that last a finite duration in time (the true sense of relational spacetime), do have organic properties. Accordingly the scalar Universe is an organic fractal that reproduces forms of information in all scales under selfsimilar laws, as space and time are not only topological=mathematical, but also organic.
This means we can ad to the analytic mathematical properties of all systems, organic properties, and we can consider all scales to be self similar.
Such systems have an organic symbiotic, feedback nature, as smaller cellular/atomic/memetic parts store more information in its faster ðime clocks, so they code and reproduce the larger whole (particles reproduce other particles and form atoms, with quantum information; genes reproduce cells and super organisms, and individual humans reproduce memes that create social super organisms).
On the other hand the whole synchronises with its larger sizemotions the whole parts, moving them together. Since there is no loss of information reproducing information from the lower to the upper scale, and no loss of entropy moving wholes synchronically. So the differences between both arrows make cells and wholes, atoms and matter, individuals and societies coexist and synchronise and work together in an organic NOT a mechanical manner.
Reality is a 5D fractal of spacetime beings.
Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar spacetime, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.
In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.
In the graph, the Universe is a fractal of information, which has the properties of fractals:
 A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeats similar patterns in different scales of size. This in NATURE, means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replication its form in the different ‘scales of spacetime’, from the smallest particles through atoms,
molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form.  A fractal is a selfreproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.
In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.
In fact we shall see that all the Universe really does is to reproduce patterns of information, which is carried in the cyclical motions of time clocks…
In the graph, the fractal, organic networks that structure all the spacetime beings of the scalar Universe, whose homologic laws in each scale of size repeat the same patterns of energy and information, the 2 elements that construct all the organisms of the Universe. Humans have very slowly come to the realisation of the existence of this 5th dimension of scalar size and its fractal organic structure, which all its systems made to the image and likeness of the whole follow.
The Universe is a fractal of spatial entropy or ‘Motion’ and temporal information or ‘Form’, if we were to use the more profound terms of philosophy of science. How a fractal NOT of digital numbers but of 2 different concepts, ‘motion’ (energy, translation in space, entropy, displacement, lineal distances, etc. will be found to be selfsimilar terms) and dimensional ‘form’, (time cycles, clocks, information, logic form, spherical form will be synonymous) structures its repetitive actions that allow the fractal to grow and scale up and down its forms? This is the question we shall study in depth in those posts – the selfreproductive properties of fractal organisms.
The Universe is a fractal organism that reproduces information, even motion can be understood in terms of reproduction of a particle’s form, along the path of its quantum wave (Bohm). But what is the purpose of information? Communication, between similar beings that share the same code; so they can evolve together into larger, stronger wholes.
Thus the Universe has also a scalar structure organised by networks of information that evolve socially parts into wholes, from simple particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, planetary systems, and galaxies, which form a fundamental fifth Dimension of scalar spacetime, whose ‘metric equations’, will reveal all the hidden variables and whys of existence.
In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung. Fractal and nonEuclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new arrow of time, fractal information, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce over a canvas of simpler, energetic motions. Time bends space into masses, said Einstein.
Time evolves form, said Darwin. We can mathematize those processes through selfreproductive fractal equations that iterate a certain form of nature—an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle. Since the Universe is a “fractal of energy and information, made of selfsimilar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms.” Indeed, from the simplest particles, quarks, and electron, which absorb energy and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bytes of energy, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies.
In the graph, we see the overwhelming experimental evidence of that Fractal Structure of the Universe, made of networks of selfsimilar forms, which from a larger scale seem mere points – hence a universe organised in relative scales of diminishing size in space (Spe) and faster ‘speeds’ in its informative time cycles, (Tiƒ), which defines a 5th dimension of spacetime. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those networks of ‘Organic Points’ the fundamental particle of the Universe.
∆±I PHYSICAL SCALES
Now we have so far introduced all those beings that populate the scales of 5D³ reality with ‘weird’ organic properties proper of the expansion of GST laws to all of them.
This of course is not what the restricted, reductionist, abstract, mathematical/geometric only analysis of our popes of philosophy of science, classic physicists do with them.
And since Popes and brahmins hold the imagination of people with their dogmas, I doubt any is still here, but for the intelligent and brave that have gone so far, here comes a view of the physical analysis of those scales passed through the enhancing ‘perspective’ of ∆st scales.
So we shall now consider a slightly more ‘classic’ approach to those scales from the perspective of modern physics, which surprisingly enough fit them all nicely even if it ignores its organic properties, natural to the fact those scale coexist organically and have three arrows of time, which order their existence as ‘lifedeath world cycle’ of creation of extinction considered in the next paragraph. Let us see them in the next graph:
In the graph, the ∆±4 scales of physical systems, self centred @ the human ∆• pov and the 5D metric equivalence between its time speed and space distance which gives us its coinvariant energy, in all scales (S x T = K)
How many physical scales there are in the Universe? The answer in ∆ST is likely ∞. Though this kind of metaphysical questions can only be considered in pure metaphysical grounds. So beyond the considerations of metaphysics and the limits of description of non¬Æ logic systems with human languages, nonE maths of fractal points and nonAristotelian logic of 3 time arrows, we are left to consider the scales of which we are experimentally aware, even the limiting scale (dark, ‘string’ world) which we do not perceive, but can hint at and describe logically and mathematically by plugging into 5D³ what scientists have observed and constructed in a normal continuum.
As it happens this dark world scale, outside galaxies and inside the particles of atoms is today overwhelmingly described by string theory, which has a ±side to it: as it is not observable it has only been developed through exploration of mathematically consistent scenarios, which are able to ’emerge’ in our world with certain coherence. But precisely because of that freedom of thought given by the lack of experimental evidence, we have been able to develop freely the string theory unshackled of erroneous concepts of classic physics regarding dimensions, time and space, and it turned out that the result is perfectly coherent with 5D³ giving us systems with Spaceopen strings, and timeclosed strings, with 10 dimensions, in which the fundamental symmetries are those between Sopen and tclosed string and between ∆±i scales, the so called Tduality (we shall from here on call it ∆±iduality, as ∆±i is its proper name, since it precisely refers to the fundamental fractal, scalar symmetry of ∆st: the infinitely small i, is symmetric to the infinite large, +i). For all this we consider string theory truth, but obviously on need as all other models of streamlining and small correction and ‘choices’ departing from the laws of the scalar, fractal $paceðime Universe.
It is then when we can easily assess…
The ∆i=±≤4 scales of physics and its errors of human interpretation.
Now once we know the basics of ∆st the ‘naming of those scales’ are of less importance, as we shall use quantitative results of classic physics and order them as physicists do by logarithmic decametric scales, whose origin we explain in our general article of 5D³ theory. It is though fundamental to understand its ∆±i duality (Tduality in the jargon of string theory), as it is the key ∆duality of the Universe, and so it is the best way to name those interrelated scales as a game of russian dolls, which connect the largest and the minimal parts for all the reasons studied in the general model.
So those scales are when we take them loosely selfcentred in the ‘humind membrain’:
∆±4: Dark world or String World, shown in the graph above and below the knownknown galactic world subdivided by the ∆±i duality, in:
∆+i=4, above the galaxy, which becomes a fractal point of this larger scale of ‘hyper strings’ (in the most extended models of mathematical physics) and…
∆4, which becomes the better explored world of strings, which are conforming ‘magically’ (: to almost all the laws of ∆st, which as usually will be used conceptually more than mathematically (we do NOT stop to repeat, mathematical physics done by ‘robotlike scientists’ of the mathematical method, which ignore however the concepts and meanings behind many mathematical parameters, are right.
So we hardly get into them, taking into account that most people don’t understand them anyway – what we want to do IS to use ∆st for what is worth:
 To streamline and make sense of all that ‘magic’ hidden in the ‘experimental equations’ of mathematical physics, which as mathematics is an experimental language, do apply also here.
 To select among the ‘inflationary theories of mathematics’ which as all ‘free languages of information’, not constrained by the efficient choices of the Universe and the limiting parameters of its limited motions and ternary logic, those theories which are right.
 To interpret then the experimental evidence that acts as a final check on 1 and 2. Strings thus must be related to the scanty evidence we have of that world, and this means they must be connected with elements that we hint at but are invisible to us – hence should be part of the lower dark world below light, and this is the case of neutrino physics, which happen to have a ‘weak angle’ on the string scale, which can be and seem to be by clean ‘first data’, able to move faster than cspeed, hence belonging to the ∆4 world, (of larger space, lesser information hence v:>s/<t >c).
∆st proofs of string, tachyon, 10D, Tduality and neutrinolight theories.
The funny thing about string and neutrino and gravitational theories when plugged into ∆st is that all what physicists stuck in a single light spacetime scale (∆3) consider weird and wrong about their theories. Such as in a nonexxhaustive list:
Neutrinos faster than light, neutrino theory of light, tachyon strings, gravitons, ∆±i ‘tduality’, which makes the infinitely small a mirrormind of the infinitely large, 10 dimensional strings (properly considered as the 10 dimensions of ∆•st systems), strings as invisible gravitons, nonvibrational, ‘pure lineal’ strings as the infinite ∆4 tachyon sea over which our world rests, etc. All those features of the dark world ARE MANDATORY FEATURES when we apply the simpler, isomorphic laws and 5D metric proper of all scales of ∆ST to the ∆±4 dark world.
So in fact all what makes them doubt of string and neutrino theory to the point of getting them very nervous whenever they find faster than c speed measures in neutrinos and quasar, IS what PROVES those theories rights and makes so beautiful string theory, once we selected the proper forms (10dimensional string theories) and adapt them to ∆st mathematically by correcting its main error (redeveloping them not as a newtonian spacetime theory but as a relational spacetime theory: closed loops ARE time clocks and open strings ARE space quanta).
We shall call ∆4, as Physicists do the Planck scale, and call its fundamental supœrganism, a PLANCKTON in order to unify and streamline the infinite kaleidoscopic mirrors of inflationary mathematics used to describe them, neither a ‘string’, nor a ‘neutrino’, or a form of ‘dark matter’ (begin dark matter just quark matter likely strangelets in the halo – the so called Witten hypothesis – and top quark black holes in its centre – which I call Einstein’s hypothesis as he rightly say that in a hylomorphic universe, they must have a cutoff particle substance to be real, which only can be in quantitative terms heavy bct quarks).
So Planckton, as plankton feeds the seachain of life being its minimal cellular unit, will be the minimal unit of the physical world and its scales AS A WHOLE fundamental first particle, to which we shall refer all other subparts, subequations, kaleidoscopic slightly biased mirrors and elements developed by inflationary mathematical physics at that scale.
To notice finally that from the •Mind perspective it remains to be argued if the string scale, as we observe the electron mind NOT the Universe is merely equivalent to the description of the minimal mind scale, which is observing from the atomicego the visual picture of the galaxy; a philosophical question which shall be considered also for all the other dualities – are we seeing reality or all is a dial go between scales of the electronic mind? (:
String theory then will provide and we shall describe the conceptual truths behind it the ‘background of Planckton’ over which at the next ±10¹° scale we find the ‘galactic light spacetime’ world, or quantum scale:
∆±3,2: the galaxy atom
Next we enter into our Island Universe, which we can duly observe and compare inside out – the ∆3 scale of atoms and the ∆+3 scale of galaxies. And the interesting ∆±i ‘Tduality’ (string jargon) here, is that as we are inside the galaxy, we can observe the inside of the atom, which we cannot really see, by comparing its selfsimilarity in the fractal Universe with the inside of the galaxy of which we do have a lot of experimental evidence; and we can compare the outside of the atom, which we can see (electromagnetic entropic space) with the outside of the galaxy (dark entropy space), which we can see, provided with the realisation that scales in the Tdualities are very similar but not necessarily (open question for philosophy of science, or ‘metaphysics’) equal.
So in this scale we find the strongest experimental evidence ALSO to fill up the gaps of the ∆±4 scale.
Those scales are the cosmic and gravitational scales studied by astronomy on the large world and by quantum physics on the small world.
We though can now do further ‘scaling’ and subdivide for more detailed analysis all the elements, parts, subparts and 10decametric sub§cales of the galaxyatom as physicists do, in different quantum, electromagnetic, atomic and subatomic analysis.
∆±2: Subparts of the galaxyatom.
As a general rule the parts of a whole are obviously a ‘digit less’ in ∆scales, comprehending a myriad of little elements, but grossly divided as usual in a t±s:membrane/singularity system and a t x s : vital space, enclosed between them.
For this scale they will be the black hole/nucleon world, and the electron/strangelet outer halo, and in between the star/electromagnetic light space we live in.
The top quark black hole
So this new ‘Tduality’, should exist between the inner atom nuclei and the black hole nuclei of galaxies, which we have partially UNIFIED quantitatively with the Unification equation of scales, that shows the black hole galaxy is indeed equivalent in its Schwartzchild radius to the radius of the proton and hence the black hole nuclei of the galaxy should be positive, hence should be a top quark star, as only top quarks are ++ and heavy enough to be the hylomorphic cutoff substance on them. This IS the Einstein’s hypothesis of the nature of black hole as top quark frozen stars, which he said was the only way he would believe in black holes – but as top quarks were not found in his lifetime he always remained skeptic of them. Of course, the Einstein’s hypothesis render false and a mere mathematical inflationary theory with zero experimental proof and zero theoretical value, the socalled Hawking’s theory of evaporation of black holes.
To make black holes we just need to make a lot of top quarks, product of the Higgs decay in particle physics or the evolution of mass into its III ‘old age of maximal density of information’, which can be achieved in accelerators that therefore will make them when enough energy is compressed to evolve lighter quarks at CERN. And they will NOT evaporate, but grow exponentially as all seeds do till eating us the planet, what can i say?
In any case for the same reasons the Tdualities in those subparts will be between negative strangelet halos of galaxies (Witten’s hypothesis proposed by one of the string theorists) and electrons, also negative in atoms. And then between the light spacetime in between and its particle states as photons, and the galactic stars ad its electromagnetic radiation at galactic scale or..
∆±i≈Tduality photon≈star.
The field of ∆±2 scaling thus is necessarily huge, but for the sake of simplicity and comprehension of the larger ∆st picture and its isomorphic laws, we just consider in more detail as the key secondary scale, according to the general rule that considers the main task of ∆st to understand the role of man in the Universe, NOT the inner region of atoms (strong forces, quarks, dark world) which is despite the huge sums spent in risky experiments (CERN’s LHC) to explore it, the much more important, less uncertain, better understood and closely related to the electronic mind of humans and machines, world of light at the ∆i scale and stars at the ∆+1 side.
Again the understanding of those dualities is scanty in present physics – curiously enough denied in black holes, as funny mathematical tools for weirdo theories, which physicists, ‘digital robots’ operating equations of maths they do not fully understand, so much love to do. The most developed are those of string theory and some work has been done on the galaxyatom, also by Einstein, whose relativity in fact used to simplify calculus models of Hydrogen atoms as Galaxies, from where most results of general relativity at cosmological level were made; and of lately a lot of modelling of stars as photons, specially in the dense region close to the centre of the galaxy has been done, also with excellent results. If we ad the previous Unification equation of charges and masses obtained from this Tduality it seems more than proved.
So ∆2,3 will be the quantum, electromagnetic scale studied by quantum physics, which as usual best applies to electronic/light phenomena where it was found (expansions to all other elements of physics and even the human universe, with weirdo wrong egotist Copenhagen interpretations must be partially corrected, or taken to the Tussaud museum of monstrous things 🙂
This scale thus connects also at •level of interpretations with the digital, visual ∆0humind view, which is the selfcentred linguistic frame of reference of visual, Euclidean perpendicular dimensions of a cartesian (graph) in mathematical physics.
As our spacetime is 3D perpendicular euclidean light spacetime. And so an interesting mental deduction when widening the abstract reductionism of the human egocentered mind, which uses those cartesian frame of reference, only to study the ‘locomotion’ of physical species far removed from our ∆st nature, is to consider the mental aspects of particles, specially photons and its ∑photon=electron, social grouping in orbitals.
Since if our mind is just a bunch of electrons, which are a bunch of photons, and physical systems obey laws of mathematical, euclidean frames of reference is because quantum physical systems have particlelike points≈singularities that command the systems with sentient, vital properties. And this of course will be a huge field of research – to explain physical events as the product of the vital actions of its atomic and subatomic systems, expressed in the four quantum numbers that describe their energy feeding (principal), information gauging (azimuthal) reproduction (spin couples) and social evolution (magnetic number).
And so this lead us to the final scale of physical systems, the:
∆º±1: human, thermodynamic scale.
This is our scale, because it is the scale of life, of cellular activity, and the scale of our larger, immediate geological world, and as such by far the more important, and the one that should be used as Einstein wanted to model statistical quantum mechanics once the basic correction of describing it with a single time arrow is solved.
So we bring back again the real three time arrows of this scale and its ±1 plasma origin and finale, just in case you haven’t got through the infinite repetitions of your brain,t eh fact that entropy only theories merely took laws that apply ONLY to gaseous entropic state, disregarded the liquid, balanced and solid, informative states of matter, and on top alas, hyperbolically extended those laws to all scales and cosmologies, giving birth to the absurd bigbang theory, and concepts about a dying universe, where disorder and chaos is the best possible and only future state of reality.
According to the rule that close scales are better observed, hence its laws more accurately the task thus IS inverse to that of weirdo quantum physics: to streamline with thermodynamic homologies as quantum pilottheory does, the philosophy of science of the quantum world today in egotist ‘mood’ into the realism of thermodynamics.
The social scale. Everything is love.
Now what we shall state is vital for you to understand what is the purpose of life and history: because the Universe constantly reproduces information, the goal of the Universe is to create social super organisms, which in verbal terms translated into the arrow of social love for your species. So we can observe an absolute arrow of time, that of social evolution, which creates new wholes from parts, molecules from simpler atoms, cells from simpler molecules, then organisms, super organisms, planetary systems, galaxies, etc. Reality is NOT about death but about life.
The absolute arrow of time of social evolution Is the ‘fifth dimension’ of the scalar Universe that constantly expands its scales of social growth.
In the next graph we show the two ‘false and real pyramids’ of social behaviour, according to ‘capitalist, military idologies’ of dogeatdog societies vs, humanist sciences of social evolution’:
So much for absurd ideologies of history that deny the power of social love and the need of mankind to evolve together into a social super organism. They are military, dogeatdog false ideologies of DEATH AND ENTROPY, which deny the ultimate laws of the Universe. The absolute arrow of social evolution, of time IS love. ITS relative arrows ARE ternary worldcycles of life and death. They are explained in great detail in the right side, on the section of general systems, the scientific r=evolution of philosophy of sciences and biology taken place in the XXI c:
The Universe is no longer modelled as a machine, a simplex version of a future robotic organism, but as an organism, and so are all sciences (upper right side graph), based in the laws of the ‘scalar fifth dimension’ of the Universe, made of ‘planes of spacetime’ of different ‘size’ and ‘speed’ in its time clocks.
I.e. You enclose inside as a super organism, the cellular scale made of smaller cells in spatial size, which run faster time clocks; and cells are made of smaller genetic molecules that run faster time clocks, and so on till reaching the scale of particles. Humanity then in the upper scale of religions, nations, civilisations and ultimately mankind as a super organism, developed in time as History, IS the scale above the individual. And we can study with the isomorphic=equal laws of all systems of Nature regardless of scale.
VI •EGOIST MINDS: ¬Æ POINTS
The 0mind dimension of still, pure linguistic information can be seen as a positive form that generates order but also as a still selfish p.o.v. that distorts and limits the freedom of herds of moving cycles of existence.
LINGUISTIC MINDS:
‘Cogito ergo sum’ Descartes. ‘E pur se muove, e pur no muove’ Paradox of Galileo
Minds are knots of time cycles, which ‘wondrously’ achieve synchronic passages of those cycles through its knot of perception, Γ•, a singularity • connected to a fractal generator of a supœerganism, Γœ. A mind is thus the brain that knots with its actions a simultaneous region of time cycles called a supœrganism, which travels through the fifth dimension in a world cycle of existience, that is, of exchange of entry, energy and information (exi), in a larger field of space time, st, defined by a specific st¡ence, of ∆¡=x.
This in simpler jargon means all around you you will find ‘constant knots of time cycles’ that manage in a true equilibrium of existence to float between two planes, ∆±i, as a living, ∆º, Γ•, being, alas, in virtue of something we might call, language, perception, awareness, intelligence, or simply tripping, because that is what minds do, tripping exist¡ential dreams called ‘life cycles’.
The killing, ego centered monad vs. The communicative, creative mirror.
Existential logic thus precludes that a mind which is selfishly ignoring the needs of its ternary parts, concentrating only in being a membrain, selfcentred in the singularity warps, sucks in, sinks and dies, by excess of information, obsession with the ‘pressures’ of the external world and lack of balance within it.
In the third age though the mind no longer keeps the balance of reproduction and enters in the third vortex age of increasing involution, as it is connected to its time function more than to the space function of existence. In this third age the monad is in the highest state of information, and its ego ∆º world has become a curved black hole, its personality diminished to the understanding of not being anything but a warping, dirty bag of time cycles:
We could call the Mind, M³=MonadMirrorMind, a term first use by Pythagoras, the first scientist, then elaborated by Leibniz, the greatest of his disciples, which now come the full circle around in this blog that upgrades the perennial philosophy of complex stience, adding all the necessary details and corrections of structure to make sense of it all.
In the graph, the amazing insights of Pythagoreans, who draw the mindsingularity as the common unifying principle of all systems, closed by an external cyclical membrane, which stored the vital ‘energetic §pace’ of the being. This ternary structure is thus as Leibniz and Descartes rightly understood the fundamental particle of the Universe.We compare it with its inverse topological vision, as it is precisely the two parts, singularity and membrane which formed the monad of pythagoras, the two parts that in an open ball of energy, present existence do not really exist as part of the open ball (remember mathematics is an experimental science).
But Leibniz, rigorous with his mathematical analysis DID not give his monads communicative properties to simplify their analysis, making them all ‘black holes of perception’, NOT as they are mirrors who selfcreate and then project the self into the environment, and further on points that become connected with similar points through those flows of communication into building topological networks and supœrganisms. And as a result sooner or latter systems become organic systems across ternary scales, which the monad communicate.
So reproduction, and selforganization is the ultimate cause of the process of existence of supœrganisms.
But why they go through world cycles? Why we die? For the same reason mirrormonads create reality; because of the singularity or mind of maximal information that both will create as a seed of form from ∆1 the whole being in the beginning of the cycle, but will annihilate it at the end of the cycle, when exhausting its entropic motions and combined energy, by the mere fact of being its maximal will that of perception, without which the game does not start.
Thus minds stop entropic motion into form, combining them in the middle as a series of actions of energy, which are in derivative view standing 0 points but in its ultimate infinitesimal view always ‘scar’ a bit too much of information that they devolve back as entropy and so they are the reason systems evolve, age and finally die after a given number of frequency steps in the path of pure ‘stiff’ form, constantly growing by the influence of the mind’s sink.
So the development of the three ages of life, max. s≈youth, max. t=3rd informative age, and max. st=present balance of energy and information is ultimately the ‘existential vibration’ of the being in his specific wordcycle ashe ‘scales up and down’, through its ∆±1 panes of existence.
Death becomes then natural to all selfish, Stiƒminds, which transforms entropic §pace into a flow of TEMPORAL information in the stillness of the mind, which converts temporal flows into a synchronous super organism, made of actions=moments of existence.
This is the ultimate conceptual duality – that between the magic harmonious creation of infinitesimal minds of §pacetime: ∆•st.
And the Universe they reflect and will return to in the entropic explosion of death: ∆ûst vs. Temporal, mindless motion with its automaton deterministic cyclical order.
So it is now time to switch perspective from the objective description of reality as we have done through the external point of view of the three arrows of time and the scales of the fifth dimension, to the inner point of view of languages of the mind that distort the Universe as physicists do, to cater to the subjective ego of those minds, casting them with a formal equation that explains why at the end, people like Bohr, the proponent of the uniqueness of ‘his discipline’, not Bohm (the proponent of the whole unity of it all, and the realist, quantum interpretation of reality), carried the day.
SIMPLY put it, because while the Universe is objective, just, eternal and perfect, all those infinitesimal •minds embedded on it, are subjective, egocentered, fleeting imperfect parts of the whole, made ‘to its image and likeness’, with some ‘errors’ of design…
So it only rests to see that languages, both verbal, visual and mathematical derive also form the 5 Dimensions of spacetime and then we shall have proved that languages ARE just mirrors NOT the original source of reality.
Indeed, a mirror always ‘reduces’ reality to less dimensions in the image, so do languages, and so if we can show you that languages are more reduced than spacetime, and can be defined as mirrors of spacetime, it is obvious that spacetime is the source of all realities, INCLUDING languages.
Languages are mirror of the 3 motions of spacetime, entropy, energy and information.
A more humble realisation comes from the understanding that ‘the languages of God’ are infinite (upanishads) as all singularity minds map the Universe into its infinitesimal still focus, reflecting in the linguistic mirror the infinite cycles of spacetime that conform reality. So before the language there was the space and time, that carried the entropy and information of reality mixed in energy actions whose properties the ternary syntax of all languages reflect. So the 3 main languages of man are ternary syntactic mirrors of the 3 components of reality:
Subject (information) < verb (action of spacetime) > Object (entropy of subject).
Y (time function)< operandiaction> X (space function)
Blue (informative color) < green (reproductive colour) > red (entropy colour)
Heigth (informative dimension) < width (reproductive dimension) > length (motionentropy dimension)
And so on…
But humans have had as egocentered minds a real hard time understanding languages only as mirrors of spacetime; thinking instead that languages – specifically the languages humans better understand wor(l)ds and numbers create reality. So we have first to put at face value that egocentered humind paradox.
0. Human creationist theories
The cultural view.
2D: Moving lineal white visual minds – 1D: informative, social, mental verbal; 3D: reproductive, emotional bodyoriented
Before we even go further a ‘downer’ on the Nature of humans. Relational spacetime, while being essentially the philosophy of Asia, has had always a hard time to be accepted in ‘anthropomorphic’, selfcentred, ‘egotist’ western cultures. As said all is generated by the 3±∆ dimensions of reality, so we shall also study in our analysis of man as a dimensional spacetime being, the 3 ‘cultures’ of the mind in mankind. Since as the graph shows, western ‘visual, dolicocephalic, lineal people’ tend to have simplified theories of reality based in single lineal time dimension vs. eastern ‘cyclic, verbal, brachicephalic people, which have cyclical concepts of reality, and finally coloured cultures with a psylocephalic brain (new term of the many we shall introduce in the blog to upgrade ‘stiences’) focus on ‘animist, sensorial theories’… Obviously an important category of General Systems Sciences (ab. GST, ∆@s≈t) is the classification of ‘all species’ and variations of reality according to the 3±i dimensions of reality.
So we could state that if the mongoloid, cyclical, verbal, organic culture had dominated the world, relational spacetime would be already our philosophy of science. And if we couple it with the animist theories of a living organic Universe we would be far better off in our understanding of all of it. But as we are in the world of ‘entropic, military, lineal, western cultures’, those concepts of lineal time (invented by Galileo in its study of cannonballs) which simplify our understanding of information, dominate by ‘dogma’ our Universe.
ILOGIC MATHEMATICS
THE FORMALISM OF MINDS: NONÆ FRACTAL POINTS.
All this said, it is interesting to improve the spatialgeometrical mirror of maths on the minds, which is expressed by the 5 Postulates of none geometry images of the 5 Dimensions of the Universe.
Let us then consider how those spatialgeometric mirrors can improve the description of spatial minds, studying the seemingly equivalent 1st and 5th noneuclidean postulates that describe a fractal point:
In the graph, the mind is the formalism of the Universe, as it is a linguistic object that create ‘space’ by shrinking the dimensions of the cycles of spacetime, to fit a opoint, eliminating the fifth dimension of scales, reducing perception to the ∆º scale in which the mind’s super organism exists, reducing motion to fit a still mapping, shrinking it as a topological sphere (Poincare’s Conjeture) and eliminating by ‘bifocal’ vision, the third dimension of depth.
ALL THIS gives birth to a ‘fractal point’, which allows a relative ∞ number of parallel flows of entropy, energy and information to ‘cross a single point that becomes larger when we come closer to it (5th postulate of nonEuclidean geometry, basis of the relativistic r=evolution of physics of the XX century that now ∆ªS≈T enlargers to explain all ‘linguistic mindsmonads’ to find the ‘whys’ of the Universe.
Once we show that information is merely the still perception by a ‘linguistic mind’ of the frequency and form of the time cycles and repetitive actions of the system, hence conclude that the Universe reproduces ‘timespace cycles’, the conclusion is obvious: we are all timespace organisms, organisms of spatial energy and temporal information, made to the image and likeness of the whole, which follow the same (‘isomorphic) laws of all other time space beings.
Those laws are spatial=topological and temporal=biological, as the actions and motions of all systems have the goal of survival, without need of consciousness, in as much as those systems that do not repeat its information do not survive into the future and no longer exist.
Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single spacetime continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath.
However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of spacetime’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those spacetime systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.
So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, NonEuclidean point with spacetime parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational spacetime. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of NonEuclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of spacetime were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of ‘—motions’ and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point.
This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels. So we must consider that what Einstein proved using NonEuclidean points to explain the structure of spacetime is its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact selfsimilar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact selfsimilar structures to the macrostructures we see with the naked eye.
That is in essence the meaning of Fractal NonEuclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of spacetime’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘NonEuclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of ‘—motions’ and information that defines them.
Einstein found that gravitational SpaceTime did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:
Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel
Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:
Abstract, continuous, onedimensional point:
. ____________
Instead Einstein found that the spacetime of the Universe followed a NonEuclidean 5th Postulate:
A point external to a line is crossed by ∞ parallel forces.
Real, discontinuous, ndimensional points: ===========o
This means that a real point has an inner spacetime volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that NonEuclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with spacetime parts.
So spacetime is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a celllike point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a pointlike nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many pointlike atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.
So each point is in fact a 3dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on. Yet those dimensions are the socalled fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point.
In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: To be a fractal world, a spacetime in itself.
‘Any NonEuclidean point is a fractal spacetime with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the st+1 ecosystem in which it exists’
The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they actreact accordingly.
The fundamental particle of the Universe is not a physical form but a logic particle: a knot of time arrows, which in any scale of reality, from physical particles (quantum knots of ‘—motions’ and information) to biology (knots=networks that absorb ‘—motions’, information and reproduce and evolve into bigger knots) act under a single mandate: to maximize those time arrows, a fact that we formalize with an equation, the function of Existence: Max. ∑Sp x Tƒ; which is the fundamental function of both, logic and mathematical languages. In the graph, all such points of view, will define a system of relative perpendicular coordinates, through which it will enact its time arrows, departing from a central knot of information.
In the graph, apperception of the Universe happens by reducing the cycles of time into a single spherical point, according to the topological properties of all spherical systems, which can diminish in size without deformation.
This is called the Poincare Conjecture, (his recent proof by Mr. Perelman was the most important finding on mathematics in decades). It simply speaking only nspheres can reduce without limit an ndimensional Universe into a fractal mirror without deformation and tearing. And that is why there is a fundamental dominant membranepoint system in all the organisms of the Universe, which creates the order of reality. The paradox though is that the membrane, the time cycle is moving very fast, and the point in the center is a static mind.
Formal, topological definition of timepoints: minds, and spacefields.
‘Each point holds a world in itself’ Leibniz
As we shall repeat once and again, the true colossus of science have been his philosophers NOT his physicists, though Planck and Einstein, once philosophy of science waned, have value in its statements. Aristotle, Descartes & Leibniz thus form the triad of intuitive geniuses GST will when fully developed consider its western pioneers. Let us then translate their ‘monadintutions’ in a formal topological definition:
“A mind singularity is a point of time displaced in its latitude of synchronous clocks speeds that occupies a single quanta of space, a field is a extension of simultaneous space enclosed in a single quanta of time.”
We concluded earlier that pure time, the absolute arrow is that of the fifth dimension, relative time is the world cycle as it ends always in a zero moment, lineal time duration is a distortion of cyclical time, made continuous by pegging cycles of time one after another.
How can then we define properly relational time and space in formal terms? In the previous sentence we resume the concept, which takes the inversion of informative time and entropic space to its natural limits.
They will be the formal limits of the being – its linguistic mind that stores all the information of the system in a single pointquanta of space (atom, cell, citizen); and can be better understood closer to humans in our social systems: a point of time or mind in a nation is the king, president of the nation, a single quanta of its space population; which is connected through the physiological networks of information of the system (the laws) to all the quanta of space who obey, and become synchronised by it.
The quanta of the galaxy is the black hole, a single central volume similar to that of a star, connected by gravitational forces to all its stars; and your ego, likely will be a single neuron of maximal communication with all its other neurons, themselves connected to all other cells; in the super organism of history we call a religion, it is the prophet whose memetic DNA connects it to all other believers in time. A POINT OF TIME, thus is a mind and it will be structured through causal time in its connection to other beings through synchronicity.
On the other hand, a extension of space exists simultaneously in a quanta of time, and so its extension will paradoxically depend of the underlying speed of its upper or lower (relative concept) scale that ‘entangles it’ through simultaneous networks of communication, sychornizing its motions. Those are laws of quantum physics, illunderstood, which can be extended to all other systems of the Universe. This introduction just gives glimpses to the whole sheer magnificent structure of the ∆±i ST universe.
Now the key to the work of those systems is the different speed of information carried by different frequency of time cycles in each scales, what allows the synchronous behaviour of all of them, guided by the fastest more complex ‘knot of timeinformative cycles – which is the mindmirror.
So we shall now consider the key element of reality a mind that synchronises in time all the systems and cycles of an organism and creates a ‘world in itself’ enclosed by a cyclical membrane – able to act on the Universe and ensure the survival of the system. This is the origin of the mind as the 5th dimension of the whole, which makes possible existence of beings:
The mind has a fundamental role: to embody the perception of the whole super organism and as such is rightly considered the 5th dimension of the being.
The 3 spatial Postulates and its dimensions; the 2 ilogic postulates and its correspondence with ∆lanes.
We can consider in another way those 5 Postulates/Axioms of ¬E as image of the 5 Dimensions and as symmetries of time and space ages/topologies:
The first postulate defines the fractal point from an objective outside perspective as a 1dimensional form (which often is seen as a dot in lineal motion); so it is the first spacetime dimension; the second postulate is a 2Dmanifold wave; the 3rd is a 3D physiological network, and defines the super organism. But the ilogic of them is given by the 4th postulate of congruence and the 5th of minds.
In the duality of @ (mindbeing) vs. NonA (outside ∞ entropic Universe), the being is ordered by the mind (5D) and the outside world of all other forms and scales is the 4D.
So the fifth postulate give us the internal mind view, as a ðpoint with an inner world, and as such represents the point as mind, the fifth dimensions, and the fourth sees the point as a simple onedimensional ‘dot’ of an immense entropic reality, to which it will be connected in parallel, ordered fashion or in perpendicular darwinian, entropic one.
The fourth postulate thus webs the rules of logic engagement of parts, in a more complex fashion, giving us all the choices and variations of similarity and perpendicularity that defines the parallel social evolution into collective minds or the entropic perpendicular darwinian destruction of systems by rival systems.
It is then in the 3 first postulates, where we find the knots and bolts of the present super organism and its 1,2,3 lineal limbs/potentials, Øbodywave fields and Oparticle/heads.
Those simpler spatial postulates of ilogic ‘vital geometry’ expand both the dimensions of the point, which has always at least 1 dimension (first postulate) (or the 5 five dimensions of the whole ‘capped’ by the mind – 5 postulate); and its present super organisms, defining 2manifold bidimensional waves of communication (2nd postulate):
The second postulate studies how motion and communication happens through those potentials in motion; and the result is the construction of networks of ‘actions and waves’ – the fourth postulate which describes the whole as a physiological system of 3 fractal networks, the new definition of a plane, which is now unlike in classic geometry defined by ‘3 lines=network waves’, the entropic, ‘digestive/territorial’, reproductive ‘blood/economic’ and informative ‘nervous/political’ systems, if we were to use for a change, the model of social super organisms both at individual human and collective, historic level.
And so the 5 postulates, the 3 of space, the 2 of logic sequential time are a good introduction to the next ‘great advance of ∆@s≈t, more detached of the classic languages, as it will include them all, the existential algebra of the generator equation.
EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA – ITS MAIN FUNCTIONS AND THE FRACTAL GENERATOR: ¬Æ LOGIC
In the graph, all systems of the Universe are super organisms (ab.œ, supœrganisms), but the further away from our perception, they seem to us, ‘less than organic’ because we do NOT perceive all the information which ‘leaks’ and ‘disappears’ as it does NOT cross fully the discontinuums between scales with its ‘Lorentzian regions’ of change in the speed and size of the system
The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Contrary to intuition, Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales (and mostly time), as they ‘reduce’ the information into a synoptic ‘pointsingularity’ the tangent that expresses tendencies in the flow of time of the function; while integrals are concerned mostly with the sum of its lower parts in space, as they expand the ‘base’ of analysis but reduce the different(ial) added information of the whole. A fascinating subject being how a ‘simple parameter data – that enclosed in a derivative or a fourier transformation SUFFICES to expand and remodel the whole system.
The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of maths, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.
Analysis is the study of events happening in transitions between ∆scales, either as infinitesimal parts come together into ‘integral wholes’ in space (integral functions), or as we extract from a system the information about its higher wholes, synoptically encoded in its inverse derivative functions.
So integrals work mostly on space, giving us therefore information about lower 5D scales and derivatives mostly on time, giving us information about parameters of the whole (but as both are symmetric, this general rule does not apply.
Integrals in topology.
As the Universe is a kaleidoscopic mirror of symmetries between all its elements, this dominant of analysis on ∆scaling must ad also the use of analysis on a single plane, in fact the most common, whereas the essential consideration is the ∆§ocial decametric and eπ ternary scaling, with minimal distortion (which happens in the Lorentzian limits between scales).
The fourier transform and harmonic functions.
It is also needed to consider in processes of emergence in time, that is in the creation of worldcycles of super organisms, sum of its 3±i actions, another key set of equations also applied in the resonance processes of emergence, namely those cyclical trigonometrical functions which better express the ‘cumulative’ process of repetition into a single final continuous whole.
And all this could be resumed in a simple definition:
The Fourier transform takes a time series or a ‘whole’ function of continuous time, and maps it into a series of discontinuous frequency spectrum. That is, it takes a function from the time domain into the frequency domain; it is a decomposition of a function into sinusoids of different frequencies, which corresponds to the ‘discrete actions=arrows’ performed with different frequencies by the Γœ system.
And vice versa each fourier transform used for harmonic analysis has a corresponding inverse transform that can be used for synthesis. So it is a mathematical tool of ðime akin to integral/derivative analysis for ∆§scales or Hamiltonian/Lagrangian functions for Spatial, Energy, single, present scales and frames of reference and its distortions of the same single Universe for Omind views; reason why ‘Hamiltonians≈Lagrangians, frames of reference, fourier, harmonic functions and integral/derivatives are absolutely allpervading equations in all branches, as they are the key functions for the ∆•st four elements of all realities, an astounding ‘magic’ fact (: which platonic gurus who know nothing about first principles have always wondered about (customary quip:)
Finally an important and necessary concept about ∆§caling are the Lorentz Transforms and the duality between lineal and curved functions, which properly translated have applications to all scales reason why it has spur given the love of all things 4D and our tribal idols of physics 🙂 an astounding rain of ‘magic’ isomorphic equations between sciences, but it comes to this:
The key distinction on 5D motions are motions restricted to growth in a single scale (∆§ wellbehaved scaling) versus ∆±i ‘distorted emerging and dissolution, which does change the form of the system, as it represents a discontinuity in which either information accelerates and size shrinks establishing new constants of spacetime (downwards) or vice versa, information thins and space grows.
So those regions were not properly ‘analyzed’ as for very long it was for ∫∂, necessary the ‘continuity’ without such distortions of the function studied, and so analysis was restricted to ∆(±1 – 0) intervals and ‘broke’ when jumping two scales as in processes of entropy (deathfeeding). But with improved approximation techniques, functionals and operators (which assume a whole scale of ∞ parts as a function of functions in the operator of the larger scale) and renormalisation in double and triple integrals and derivatives by praxis, without understanding the scalar theory behind it, this hurdle today…
And it has always amused me that humans can get so far in all disciplines by trial and error, when a ‘little bit of thought on first principles’ could make thinks much easier. It seems thoughthought beings are scarce in our species and highly disregarded, as the site’§ight§how (allow me, a bit of cacophony and repetition the trade mark of this blog and the Universe 🙂 As usual I shall also repeat, I welcome comments, and offers of serious help from specialists and Universities, since nothing would make me happier than unloading tons of nowconfusing analysis not only of analysis, before I get another health crisis and all goes to waste in the eternal entropic arrow of two derivatives, aka death.
3 TOPOLOGIC ARROWS OF SPACETIME + 5D TERNARY SCALES:
The formal stience of 5D is analysis. Derivatives are mostly concerned with synthetic information on upper scales and time; integrals with the sum of its parts in space. The interaction and symmetries and travels through 5D are thus better understood in terms of analysis, which has become the dominant formal stience of mathematical physics concerned with the study of 5D motions, without mathematicians and physicists understand why.
On the other hand, topology is the formal stience of the three arrows of timespace, and as such it reduces all the forms of the Universe to its only three topologies – another ‘magic’ fact of experimental mathematics, never understood in science.
As such the true revolution of mathematical stience goes through the conversion of mathematics into an experimental stience, relating the fundamental theorems of mathematics, as the stience of logic space, to the different laws of GST both based in the fractal properties of space and the cyclical nature of time. We shall thus evolve mathematics and physics to unveil in the human languages of time and space, the underlying isomorphisms of Nature.
Mathematical physics has discovered all those relationships, but lacking a true philosophy of timespace behind it, it just thinks its all ‘magic’ of the ‘language of God’, and feels Ok without answering the whys as we do in GST. Since it has given up to go deeper, or as Feynman infamously put it ‘the why is the only thing physicists do not ask’.
This is the fact at the bottom of big science who thinks the biggest discovery of physics is to make a picture of ‘God’s particle’, without having any idea of what it is all about, as ‘magic God’s language will provide’ (: and of course the reason 5D will not interest the ‘religion’ of physicists, as it is even blasphemous to reveal ‘the name of God’… the whys of experimental science which are not mathematical only.
OF Course we can use also mystical languages to express the nature of 5D and the essence of the Universe, but it won’t then be through mathematical mystique but verbal mystique.
In mystique terms we can call this dimension the dimension of eusocial love, in mathematical terms, we shall derive it from a ‘Fractal Generator Equation’ based in the two arrows of time that constantly combine in complementary organic systems, dominated by information NOT by energy as informative heads control energy bodies and particles, waves.
The mind, its beliefs, distortions, limits of perception DO influence knowledge both at individual and cultural level as we have seen.
AND THIS is the only conclusion about ‘Physicists philosophical worldview’ – the three fundamental concepts of their philosophy of the Universe, the bigbang origin of timespace, the entropy only arrow of time and the limits of scales in quantum physics and its anthropomorphic theory of the observer ‘creating it’ are PLAINLY false, childish errors not worth the quality of its analysis of motions and physical systems.
It is however a ‘canonical falsehood’ of human thought today when religious power has been displaced by mechanical, physical power, as we moved from societies ruled by religious warrior kings who ‘believed’ in the ‘grace of God’ to hold their position, to military societies who ‘believed’ in physicists’ entropic weapons as their tool of power, to accept physicists as the high popes, not philosophers of science.
Since power imposes truth not reason, and so today entropic, bigbang explosions and quantum observers rule the Universe; regardless of the anthropomorphic non scientific distortions they impose.
So all what we can tell them is ‘stick to your guns’. Physics was in the XIX c. described as the science of (entropic) motion and that is what you do. It is your speciality but you cannot HYPERBOLICALLY EXPAND its notions to all realities and pretend motions of entropy is the meaning of it all, the Universe was born of an entropic explosion and man is the only being that understands it all sine its mind actually creates (with mathematics) reality.
BUT AS EVERYBODY loves physicists, considers them the popes of science and won’t take seriously a theory which is NOT based in his guns, we shall consider for a change a bit of humorous thought on the biggest quality of physicists, when playing to be philosophers of science, their ‘ego’.
The worldly profession of entropic weapons distorts physical views. Their ego blinds them.
As Steane explains we live in a world dominated by entropy, motion, SPEED, which has been the focus of our military, western mechanical civilisation, giving birth to biased theories of reality where only motion as explained by physicists, the makers of those machines and weapons mattered – so even our theory of the Universe is about a bigbang explosion of fast motion. So culture and power do matter in science, often more than reason and epistemology (Kuhn). This, of course, is denied vehemently by the sponsors of entropic only, motiontheories, mostly physicists, which are revered as the high popes of science, once philosophers fade away.
But power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
So, while a century ago undoubtedly physicists with the quantum and relativity r=evolutions were at the head of the evolution of science and the understanding of its ultimate principles, time and causality on one side, space and ‘scale of size on the other’, for the rest of the century their advancement on those principles have been nearly ‘null’, a fact obscured by the enormous strides they have done in their worldly profession – the construction of entropic weapons, and transport machines.
Unfortunately we worship machines so nobody dared for a century to challenge this entropic view, even when an alternative theory of reality based on information developed since II world war, in great part due to our discovery of information machines (we deal with machines, organic systems of metal, evolving into robotic organisms and what means for the evolution of the planet in our posts on eco(nomic)systems).
So we are now paradoxically in the XXI century dominated by informative machines (which physicists do help to construct), while organic, biological sciences of information have also evolved enormously our concepts of time, organisms, Nature’s information, its circadian clocks, and the ways in which smaller scales of reality with more speed processing information, code reality (so chips code economic machines, genes code biological systems and memes societies) but we do NOT have a theory of the Universe which includes as its main feature along motion, form, information.
And this is what this web offers – amazingly enough, it is the only serious formal ‘program of research’, which has completed the goal of Mr. Steane. In other parts of the blog I deal with the personal reasons why I prefer to place this model in the web instead of going through the usual rounds of paperscongressespeer reviews to get this information out.
In brief, to pass into mainstream it would have to be validated by ‘physicists’, and my experience of a very long life of activism against the nuclear industry and research in physical sciences is that indeed power has corrupted our ‘high popes of science’, and they won’t yield to reason, as a Universe dominated by information would degrade the importance of their science and enthrone biology, history, and humanity above physics, economics and machines, as the most perfect models of the laws of the Universe.
It is then more a problem of ego, as we shall show in many analysis of physical laws and theories (notably the bigbang and the copenhagen interpretation, truly ego trips of the human mind, today clearly proved false but standing despite the evidence that quantum realism – Einstein, Broglie, BOHM, pilot waves, EM engines, etc. is real, and a cyclical local bigbang (Hoyle, Penrose, this author) is the only sound explanation of cosmology.
But why to place all this information in a blog called ‘general systems’ instead of ‘philosophy of science’ or ‘theory of information’ (it does also have the easy to remember name ‘unification theory.com’)? The answer is that the purpose of complexity and systems sciences, before it became a moneymaking science dedicated to manufacture computer systems, algorithms and improve companymothers of machines as re=productive organisms, (a very specific part of the reality we care for), was precisely to explain the Universe as an organic system that reproduced information. So for a while, after my disillusion with the moral and intellectual quality of physicists I did make the rounds of System sciences to explain these models. And yet, as I said the original goal of the discipline was so forgotten that it makes no sense for me at my age, retired and tired, to steer away from computing, corporations and profitable systems, the practical goals of the practitioners of the discipline.
Still the goal that infused the founding fathers of the discipline, Bertalanffy, Wiener, Von Neumann, and other mostly mathematicians and biologists and yes.. physicists (: is the same that motivated my intellectual endeavours and so since philosophers of science are also a bit depressed and I might say conquered by the bullying of physicists, which have convinced them the ‘key to understanding’ reality is the quantum paradoxes I finally decided for this term ‘general systems’, the science today called more often complexity (GST, or general systems theory is the proper name).
But when and where and how this goal of explaining the Universe in organic, informative terms became a science? Back in NYC, the year which Einstein died.
At the death of Einstein there was of course much ‘praise’ of the founder of relativity, mostly because it was considered the father of the atomic bomb; and we were proud of having an arsenal to convert the Earth into an entropic ball of fire one hundred times around. So Time wrote a vignette with a future earth, in a galaxy with ‘continental letters’ written on it ‘Einstein was born here’. Never man has been a humble being, specially the people of the biblical culture that are supposed to be the selected race of the creator, busy busy writing continental letters to honour the supreme genius, akin to Kepler, who said upon discovering the elliptic orbits of mars: ‘God is a clocker that has waited 5000 years (biblical believer) to find a mind like his (mr. Kepler), who could admire his clock work’.
Einstein also quipped that if his theory was wrong God had to correct the Universe (it is not wrong but incomplete as it deals only with two scales of reality and one clock of time, of the ∞ scales and clocks). So it was just proper that GOD having learned the proper way to construct the Universe from Einstein, and finding in Kepler the first chosen being who understood him, would render homage to the masters – allow me some sense of humour please. I am just as Schopenhauer put it ‘a mush lost in rock in the corner of the Universe’, so I am just happy contemplating in awe the reproductive, informative Universe his mind has created.
Now physicists as we say have a reductionist, simple, mechanical vision of reality which includes a single mechanical clock, and a clocker – God, because they, only they, share with God his insights into time (Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’).
He also said to his wife, a physicist, that he should not be disturbed when thinking on how to correct God, because ‘women only reproduce their belly’. How can you expect then to explain the informative, reproductive Universe to a group of people, which even in his best examples (Einstein, mind the reader is one of my idols, despite this intro :), cannot stand biology, life, organisms. Galileo was indeed a misogynist and his quotes would land him today on jail – or making him POTUS, who knows, times are harsh.
Newton said his biggest pride was to die virgin. Hawking affirmed that he did study physics because his father’s work – a biologist – was too easy, for the less intelligent people (the three come in star trek as the biggest geniuses of mankind). His wife said he divorced because he ‘actually’ thought he was God and could create reality. Indeed, for 30 years he has been trying to create with mathematical equation evaporating black holes, but they steadily keep growing, AND NONE ever has been seen evaporating. So now to ‘create’ his ‘imaginary black holes’ (name given to them initially by fellow physicist Penrose) he is lobbying with CERN to make them on planet earth, so he can get a Saint Nobel Prize of Dynamite – this nice fellow, also a physicist who was called merchant of death as the biggest dealer of weapons in the XIX c.
So you see there is a pattern. Physicists make weapons who kill life, create theories of the Universe which start with an explosion, don’t like much women who reproduce children and love to compare themselves with God, meaning they feel they truly understand the meaning of it all, because they ‘talk mathematics the language of god’ (Galileo), but funny enough do not respect much mathematicians and philosophers of science (Hawking said we are ‘failed physicists’ – I would say they are amateur philosophers 🙂 And yet as they do make our machines, 7.5 billion humans think the same about them and their theories. So yes, I do not expect any time soon, our high popes of science – and the rest of the species who follows them – to yield to reason, peerreview this site and call the Nobel committee (:
The higher epistemological truths.
The realist concept works, based in a proved ad nauseam experimental fact – that all the scales of the fractal Universe we perceive with full detail ARE self similar in topology, time arrows and scalar coexistence of 3 ∆±1 planes?.
Basically we uphold this fact as an absolute truth, and accepting as an artefact of measure necessary for the human praxis and translation of data into workable useful parameters to manipulate reality from our point of view; but NOT as the literalist philosophy of such reality.
So the classic truths of epistemology given the INFLATIONARY NATURE of all languages that CAN MULTIPLY FRACTAL INFORMATION IN A MUCH LARGER MEASURE THAN THE SIMPLE, resistant motionsubstance of reality can accommodate (reason WHY ‘not all mathematical truths are real’ Einstein) ARE BESIDES ∆st, AND EXPERIMENTAL PROOF, STILL THE FUNDAMENTAL METHODS OF VERACITY IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS. LET US REMEMBER THE 3 FAST:
 Occkam’s razor: simplicity NOT complex equations ARE truth because the simple motionsubstance of the Universe is simple and difficult to ‘bend’
 Efficiency, a KEY to navigate the forest of nonexistent equations from SUSY to black hole evaporation of pedantic scholars. WE MUST BUILD THE UNIVERSE WITHT THE KNOWNKNOWN particles, and we HAVE already discovered them ALL because our instruments of measure have GONE well above our conceptual, mental evolution of the discipline; so we have to work on what we have and its symmetries. i.e. the background neutrino MUST be the graviton, which MUST be the scale below light… so we just have to work out the neutrino theory of light and figure the question of its faster than light speed (of the lower ∆4 dark world, its relationship with strings through its weakangle (same size), and what is really its spin number and the symmetry with the galaxyatom, i.e. the strong force and the gluon. We do NOT need more particles as we have not seen them, and so it is irrational to think that the Universal force of gravitation responds to some esoteric particle which is NOT all over the place (as neutrinos are).
 Experimental proofs: ‘science should not be concerned with events, equations and forms of which there is NOT a prior experience’, said Einstein. Indeed, the creationist works the other way around, first finds the imaginary equation and then seeks for its creationism in the Universe. We must first explore the Universe and ONLY study mathematically those phenomena we know to exist NOT to create inflationary, selfsimilar confusing equations and formalisms, which are equivalent to baroque art with many curves or repetitive religious mantras saying 1000 names of ‘God’, or poetic licences and synonymous.
The loneliness of the long distance runner.
In that regard, ∆§ð stience is a template that will require many scientists to complete it. As all new models it starts in a simplified manner; and given the inflationary multiple nature of kaleidoscopic mindslanguages mirrors of reality it will seem likely too simple for the professional physicist. But the big questions to validate this new Copernican revolution is NOT if its exactitude and complexity is similar to that of creationist mathematical physics – obviously it cannot, the same Copernicus with his cyclical orbits was less precise than Ptolomy, but if its foundations – fractal space and cyclical time as the substance of reality from where to extract isomorphic laws for all stiences – is more truth and resolves even in its simpler ‘pioneer’ format better the whys mathematical creationism cannot. And it does.
So it is only a question of time that it becomes the new foundations of a new age of ‘stience’, regardless of the shortcomings of this blog, the hardships and silence that surrounds its pioneering development, in the mind of ‘its discoverer, which becomes an isolated point, a world in itself’ (Planck). This said I apologise for the shortcomings of this blog, given the null help I have always had from academia, regardless of the ‘Nature of scientific revolutions’, which makes pioneers both envied and denied by established models.
Humans have forgotten with the arrival of timeclocks, which have a single digital arrow of motion, and the obsession for measures of speed and motion in a single plane of reality (physicists’ simple models of spacetime), most of the eternal wisdom humans developed about those 3 time arrows, the yinformation and yangentropy that combines into the qienergy beings of the Universe, in asian cultures, the past, present and future tense verbs in verbal syntax, the ternary logic of thesissynthesis and antithesis of Hegelian logic, etc.
They have, and this is even more surprising, forgotten that the existence of multiple scales of size with different speeds in its time clocks, makes the Universe a fractal of temporal information, stored in those cyclical formal clocks and spatial entropy, its inverse arrow that dissolves information; and how those two inverse arrows organise the lifedeath cycles and structure the organisms of spacetime that populate reality.
But perhaps what is worst, of modern philosophy of science is the ‘axiomatic method of selfserving truths’, the ‘dogmas of lineal time’ and ‘mathematical0nly models of reality’, the straightjacket of cultural truths born of the military obsession with entropy and weapons that reduce the Universe to those simpler motions and single clocks of time. And make us all look like mechanisms and machines, which ultimately are simple organisms.
We shall call all this philosophy of naive realism and simple truths, ‘reductionism’ because it reduces the 3 arrows of time to one, entropy, the infinite scales of reality to our light spacetime and its cspeed rod of measure, and reduces all the ternary syntax and mindlanguages that perceive such complex Universe to abstract digital numbers. Only then we can believe we understand it all, and our ‘truths’ are a complete description of reality. When we put in all the components and properties of ‘vital space’ and cyclical time, its scales and ternary arrows, our ‘physicists’ view become so shallow and insufficient that if the reader is humble enough to doubt of its memorised simple truths, and wants to expand his view of reality, he will in this blog reach a much higher degree of enlightenment and comprehension of reality with the expanded ‘new laws’ and organic structures natural to a scalar space and cyclical time analysis of reality.
How minds and languages measure time. The concept of action.
We can now return to the ‘quantitative’ analysis of how we measure timecycles. We say each species has different clocks. And so it follows that each one measures time in a different speed. But what is then the measure of timecycles? Both the speed of timethoughts, that is processes of information, and the bodyspeed in its timeactions.
So to quantitatively measure in detail the timespace cycles of a being, we must consider 2 fundamental elements:
 Synchronicities: that is the different speeds of the clocks of bodywaves, fieldslimbs and particlesheads, which most times will be synchronized. So for example, de Broglie showed that the waveparticle and field of a quantum system are synchronised. So are your steps, heart beats and mind thoughts.
 And the different actions of the being, which is the ‘substance of its time cycles, and will become the unit of timespace measure both subjectively and often objectively when we observe other systems – i.e. in quantum physics the unit is h, which measures ‘actions’ and also ‘angular momentum’ that is essentially the cyclical motion of the quantum physic system.
Thus we must deal now with the actions of the being, and its relative time beats, as they are the units that will shape quantitatively, including physics, biology and human the daily existence and program of survival of all beings.
And the rule in all of them is one of ‘efficiency’ and ‘thirst for life, for existence’. That is, systems will try to minimise the expenditure of time in its actions (law of the least time, which alone allows to define almost all of physics along the Galilean relativity already explained) and so to maximise the number of actions the being experience.
Further on because actions depend on size, the mind informative action will be the faster, related to the smaller bits of reality or ∆3 scales; while the slower actions will be those on the ∆+1 world. And so the mind commands the being as it is the fastest acting being.
NOW WE CAN CONSIDER the present spacetime view, which is that of the actions we perform as singularity minds to keep on living at the minimalist level such as the being moves in stop and go motion and when it moves ‘it spends’ part of its ‘density of information’ in the act of moving and reproducing also spends it (both are similar concepts as we have seen) so by the act of moving the being spends its existential spacetime, let us see how.
VII. ∑ÅCTIONS≈3 ÅRROWS≈∏NETWORKS≈ω
‘Do not confuse motion with action’ Hemingway
We have kept for the end of this brief introduction to the fractal organic Universe, the most important perspective, that of the will of the mind to order, organise, reproduce and survive with all its ternary system into the future, through actions, which are the subjective expression of the arrows of time, for each species that will constantly try to absorb energy for its body/wave, move with his limbs/fields and gauge information with its Tinƒormative singularity. So we shall find that the ultimate and most important, detailed perspective is that of the mind acting upon reality using its ‘energy and timeinformation’ to that aim.
And indeed, all of physics can be also reduced to this perspective that deals ‘with actions, Hamiltonians and Lagrangians’, as the ultimate unit of reality in the quantum real is an ‘Action of spacetime’, H.
So actions BRING INTO subjective REALITY for each local world selfcentred in the mind the biological meaning of the abstract arrows of time we have studied objectively. We can in that sense affirm that the actions of minds of the Universe added together give us the full meaning of the three arrows of time, for the entire world, galaxy or Universe; and in that sense reality is an astounding web of dynamic actions, which an abstract perspective in a continuous simplified manner can reduce to three ‘physiological arrows’
Actions also ad on ‘magically to create the world cycle in time of the being, as informative, implosive arrows=actions dominate the system and so ultimately the system increases its information step by step, action by action, ruled by the informative mind that dominates the other two systems. Indeed, if limbs were to dominate we would be all stupid and immortal.
We are coming to the full realisation of the way the Universe constructs its supœrganisms, from monads (formally fractal points, defined by the 1st and 5th ¬Æ postulates) into waves (monads communicating according to similarity, 2nd third ¬Æ postulates) into topological networks (planes with fractal dimensions and ‘dark holes’: 4th ¬Æ postulate), both in the spatial synchronous view, just established departing from fractal points, and in the causal sequential view in a world cycle of time.
So we can study formally reality as the building of topological planes of fractal points of any species, or giving it is living, willing nature, as monads building supœrganisms.
Departing from those fractal points as monadsminds that create selfish actions which are externally perceived as imploding, explosive or repetitive flows converging on those points, which added in parallel form a plane/arrow of spacetime (a flow of entropy, energy, information or pure absorption of form).
In this manner finally a network with holes, perceived in simplified manner as a plane topology appears and through the constant repetition of those cyclical flows or actions of timespace, of energy and information, a flow of time in synchronous manner, a life or a superorganism kicks on and will develop a world cycle of existence.
WHAT Œ DO: MINDS AS ACTORS AND 5D TRAVELLERS. Tº= ∫∃ x i ∂st
In a formal model even in philosophy of stience we need a mathematical or logical equation able to define what beings do. This in practice as maths can be reduced to topological functions, which study form in motion, and the fifth dimension to biological, organic equations that study parts and holes, and minds to logical language, means a biotopological equation, which explains what minds do. It is the fractal generator with the 3 elements of the being, Spe<st>Tiƒ, seen synchronically in space.
Now we have also described it in time, as a series of ages, dominated by one of those elements:
Tiƒ (∆1): a seed of information born in a lower scale of the fifth dimension< ∆Spe (an entropic young age after the seed emerges)> ST (a young balanced reproductive being) > Tiƒ (a third age informative species)<< ∆1: Spe (which dies in an entropic explosion).
Whereas > means an implosive informative evolution and < and explosive entropic expansion. So we are born as seeds of information in a lower scale, which surfaces and goes through three ages to return back.
The function of existence
We constantly explain reality from its 3 elements, synchronous space, temporal flows and mindssingularity. So the same equation from the perspective of the mind singularity will be a series of actions the being performs to ‘exist’, and adequately from the perspective of the mind we write the generator as a sum of actions that maximise the energy, entropy and information, motion, mind and body of the system extracting bits and bites of spacetime, ∂st, from the worldfield that surrounds it:
Tœxist: ∑Å= Max. ∫exi∂st
“Tœxist”, is then the logic abbreviation for the fundamental equation in ‘detail’, in ‘time’, of a world cycle, which will be performed by all minds, as they act bit and bite of information and energy, moving fielding
Whereas a Temporal, organic MIND, maximises its survival, its existence, through a series of actions of exchange of energy and information, ( e x i), with its entropic fields/limbs energetic bodywaves and informative mindparticles, extracting bites and bits of entropy=motion=space and form=time, ∂st from its outer world to keep ‘growing and multiplying’.
Thus tœxist is to maximise with your limgs/field bodywave and headparticle, Max. ∫exi, your actions of absorption of bits of temporal information and bites of spatial entropy from the open environment, ∂st (and minimise the loose of both).
This is selfevident and expressed mathematically for physical systems (Lagrangians, Hamiltonians, standing points, laws of minimal time, etc.), for biological systems (laws of evolution, survival of species, drives of life) and as a consequence of man being a biological system in social behaviour, which we can extend to companymothers of machines, which perform those acts for their ‘œffspring of mechanisms’, in the eco(nomic)system.
To exist, in fact can be reduced to a concept, that of a fractal that reproduces information.
So reproduction (exi, e=i), achieved in balance between energy and information, which combine to reproduce a selfsimilar being becomes the ESSENCE of all the longterm actions of beings.
As the sum of all those actions will be seen in space as the construction and growth of a synchronous supœrganism and in time as a world cycle of existence, in which the mind keeps absorbing entropy into information, growing in form in three ages till becoming a warped form no longer able to absorb more motion, wrinkled, old, and so it will return all the entropy it has warped into his still mind pov, back to reestablish the balance in the moment of death.
This simple equation, To=M∫exi∂st, where Tº IS THE MIND OF TIME, equal to its actions of energy and information exi, of existence, integrated through a world cycle from birth to extinction, ∫exi ∂st, is the function of topobiological existence that we shall then use to describe reality. And we shall call it Γo, to be is Γº exist. It is also the mandate that all beings in all its languages try to achieve: grow and multiply (hence the Maximal function put before the integral). And indeed we shall see that from that maximal function of existence, we can deduce the behaviour of all beings, even physical beings (it is in physics called the law of ‘least time’: entities constantly act as to maximise its energy and minimise its time expenditure, trying to achieve the maximal number of actions between birth and extinction).
The monad and the program of existence becomes then the absolute principles of unity of the Universe, we are all monads, and if we were suddenly to die and wake up as a cell in the lower scale we would still be trying to maximise our bodyhead systems by doing the five actions encoded in that simple equation, which we term:
a, e, ï, œ, û, a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:
accelerations (entropic motion)
energy feeding (e)
ïnformative perception and communication ï
Œ:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms
Û… and social growth into larger wholes called philosophically Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropymotions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organise into a larger whole û:
i>a>e>œ>û, i>ae>œ>u, ï>æ>Œ>Û, once and again, till this very same process, which starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die:
Thus, to express in logic and formal models what minds do with their bodies and heads, we have a simple philosophical, biologic, topologic equation, which expresses in a different way the same ternary structure.
Γ = ∑T.œ= Max. ∫exi∂st, the maximisation of that simple ternary expression of the fractal generator
The generator equation of existence is then a topobiological equation whose elements are those of a worlduniverse:
WHAT This function means is the logic and mathematical best expression of what all beings minds, Tº OF THE UNIVERSE DO: TO ABSORB entropy<energy and energy<information (feed move, perceive communicate) e x i≈ reproducing its cycles of existence.
The saint grail of the philosopher of science in many senses is always the search for the function of existence. The expression we have used for it here is by far the only one that expresses all languages and codes of the ∞ beings of the Univrse.
The MIND to exist, To, Perceives its bodywave, exi, which is extracting from the outer world, field, ecosystem, bits and bites of time and space, ∂st, and the sum of those actions, ∫exi∂st, is what we call life, the program of existence all systems follow. Finding maximal stationary points of that function is thus to start ‘to uncode’ the existence of a any biological function and topological form of the Universe.
We thus establish a generic equation of ∃xist¡ence, for all stiences of spacetime beings of all ∆¡ scales of reality, which in a mathematical form, would read: M∫∃xi∂st: Maximize your existence by combining quanta of space and time, of entropy and information ∂s ∂t, into energy (max. s: lineal motion x min. t) and information (max. t x min. s)
2, 3, 4. The real function of existence: maximise bodyhead, waveparticle, mens sana in corpore sanum.
If we call the bodywave of the system its energy and its headparticlemind its information, the previous function of existence becomes immediately real, as it merely means that all systems of Nature try to maximise their energy and information, extracting from its external Spacetime world, ‘bits and bites’ of both (∂s, ∂t), while maintaining in balance their body and mind, their particlehead in a complementary state (and their limbs/fields of entropy when they are also attached to the system, which often externalises this component).
The law of balance – synchronicity of clocks.
We have come to a biological mandate of survival, which all systems obey or else they do NOT exist. Hence all beings are existential beings that try to maximise its generator equation, its three parts, limbs/fields< bodywaves>Particle/heads. And this is what we write in an acronym manner as the maximisation of the function of existence: Max. entropy x information = energy, achieved when entropy and information are in balance (as e=i maximise the product of both: 5 x 5 > 6x 4…
So a simple equation defines the behaviour of all systems that try to maximise its motions with limbs/fields, its perception of information with heads/particles, switching modularly between both states, to balance them e>i>e, and as a result they also maximise its ‘bodywaves’ of energy, interating them along its world cycle of existence, being the ‘energy of the system’, the integration of all its parts, ∫e x i =st, across space, and its worlcycle across time such as:
Eω = ∫ M(e x i ) ds dt = 0
This amazingly simple equation thus resume all the world cycles of energy of all the systems of the universe.
‘To live is to exist, to perform the five actions that ensure your survival and maximise your drives of live FROM birth to extinction:
Max. exi=stº
MAX. entropy (limb motions) x Information (ParticleHead perception ) =ST (MAX. momentum)
Now this IS real. In physical systems is called the conservation of energy and momentum; in biological systems define the actions of top predators and the drives of life; in societies, the way countries maximise their reproductive economy, multiply its people and conquer other cultures…
And its detailed expression means that all systems of the Universe will maximise 5 sets of ‘step by step, bit by bit, bite by bid actions of entropy, information and energy’:
∆a≈∆e: maximal motion (acceleration≈expenditure of energy)
+∆e: maximal feeding (energy taking)
∆ï: max. information (+perception, – communication)
∆œ: Max. organic reproduction into an œffspring of new supœrganisms
∆û: Max. social evolution from individuals into Universals (parts into wholes).
In the graph, the fundamental actions of spacetime of all beings, performed through its world cycle which can be considered the integral of the function of existence, ∑exi ≈st
5 ÅRROWS: ÅCTIONS ON ∆±4 PLANES
Dimensions of time are discontinuous events=actions ≈arrows of time that are played by monads in discontinuous actions enabling the complex 5Dimensional ‘timeactionoriented’ program of existence. The five discontinuous timespace cycles or actions that all systems perform, become then the kaleidoscopic new vision of the five dimensions of time from another mindmonad perspective to grasp the whole synchronicity and simultaneity of it all.
As the sum of all the discontinuous five actions of all the monads of the Universe is also a program in itself that encodes all the relevant information of reality from the ‘active’, ab. å, @, point of view.
Actions as discontinuous fractal D(å)<1 dimensions of ðime§pace is an essential formal fact of reality. As we go on accelerating, energising, informing, and reproducing into new supœrganisms or socially evolving into Universals, the sum of the timespace spent in each of those actions will discontinuously amount during the finite duration of the being for a total 1dimensional fractal sum, such as we can the portrait reality as an infinite tapestry of sum of fluid actions which happen from an ∆º±4 domain due to the ∆º actions of the being exchanging motion (å±4), energy (å±2), information (å±3), reproducing (å±1) and evolving socially, (å+)…
As the discontinuous cyclical dimensions=actions=arrows=events of time of the modular • being continue, the web of its discontinuous dimensions will become a mess, which has a point of origin, alpha and omega the • monad itself…
The understanding of the five fundamental actions of timespace minds is a complex science.
First we must consider the symmetry between those actions across different scales of existence of the fifth dimension, while extracting from the ∆±4 levels of existence the different quanta of ‘energy’ (∆2), ‘information’ (∆3), ‘motion’ (∆4), or actions at distance, easy to obtain, ‘simplex actions’, vs. the actions of complex organisation, Œ, and Û, capitalised, for that reason, most often, or complex actions which also require ‘bits and bites’ of ∆1 seminal and ∆º social scales.
Then in each of those 5D time scales, the mind ‘traveller’ through the interposed regions of its Γ•, will be able to absorb and emit the different forms of entropy, energy and information (exi), which ensures the being’s proper control of its world.
So if we were to summarise the whole generator, into three clear equations, we would use the equation of the ternary dimensions of all systems (S<st>t), the acronym equation of existence, exi=st, and the more detailed ‘quantic expression’ of its actions, which put together become a zero sum: ∫a,e,i,o,u ds dt=Eω=0.
This expression of the generator is useful because it is a dynamic function of variations and can immediately relate to reality, in a mathematical form. Indeed, if we consider that all systems do perform actions of existence (absorption and emission of entropy, energy nd information in its different forms of motion) by knowing the basic operandi that relate those terms,we give a huge lap in advance. Yet given the vastness of phenomena represented by such a simple function: e x i =s±t, (one of its more common mathematical subfunctions), we have a bridge between ∆@S≈T and mathematical science, we shall explore ad nauseam in those texts.
Fractal time: actions, dimensions and worldcyles.
It only rests to consider the minimal unit of time world cycles, which is an action that exchanges, scattering entropy, lineal motion, balanced energy, implossive information and social evolution based in a common language of information with the Universe.
We divide them into:
simplex individual actions, amotion, energy feeding and information gauging and
Social complex actions, offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into Universals.
The first $ dimensional action of steady motions, accelerations and decelerations, ï the information action, which is dual (as most), since we might absorb information in perception or emit it in communication, œ, the second dimensional action of organic reproduction, into an offspring of beings, and û, the 5th dimensional action of social evolution of parts into wholes.
I have put the 5 åctions, Å=(æ,œ,ï,ø,û) with symbols that resemble the five vowels. And so as we have 3 scales of growing spatial form we have 3 scales of growing time cycles:
∑∑åctions=∑time dimensions (physiological networks and its functions) = Worldcycle of life and death (time view)
∑∑cellular/atomic/citizens parts = ∑matter states/organisms/nations= super organism (planet, ecosystem, Humanity in space, History in time).
It is essential for a full undertaking of the Universe to realise then that the 3 ‘scales of time’ and ‘space’ are coordinated together, through spacetime actions which combine in the 3 scales both space and time and give birth to the 3 ‘levels’ of reality, where the ‘slower rhythms of time’ correspond to the larger organism, connected to the OUTER world, the inner time clocks are those of the physiological constant networks and the fast beats those of the minimal actions as the being start its stop and go, st beats. So synchronicity based in 5D metric of faster clocks of information in smaller systems is a huge part of the complex theory:
A smaller faster cell reproduces information over energy and it does it every day in tune with the feeding habits of most animals, which reproduce themselves every month in tune with the original fishing high ties for amphibian eggs and/or similar theories will then RELATE the whole Universe in its scales, as a perfect organic game of multiple clocks, which in each specific science will explain the interconnected Universe from Broglie’s Bohm’s pilotwave theory of a synchronized ternary system of clocks in physical systems, through biological clocks to astronomical galacell synchronicity.
For example, the rhythms of your mind are external to you – THOSE OF THE WORLD YO SEE, then the rhythms of the 3 physiological networks produce synchronous present clocks, as in you rlimbmeter step, second heart body beat, second glimpse, thought (even in physics as in De broglie realisation of the synchronicity between particle, wave clocks).
So the equations of mathematical physics as all other languages relating all beings can be accommodated in the dimensions, motions, actions and ternary structures of 10D. In the next graph we show the minimalist parameters, which are corresponding to the minimalist ‘actions’ for both of the components of the humind, light and electrons; and the the humind, with its 3 present parts and the second time beating and its actions, similar to those of biological beings. Then we show the 3 scales of history, the super organism of mankind in its 80080 rhythms:
In graph we see the actions, space and time view and cyclical human>civilisation (super organism) life span of 80800 cycles necessary to describe the supœrganisms of history.
ABOVE, the coding of actions, which are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any time§paœrganism in light spacetime, coded by colours and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 45 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zerosums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind pov, hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of lifeexistence and the world cycle all super organism follow:
Now the 3 ages of beings happen in all systems, including mental systems, in the case of social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilisations which is art that mimic in long cycles the 3 ages of life with its 3 styles Max. x Min. T (infantile epic, lineal art, as in treccento, greek kuroi; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and baroque, 3rd age of a civilisation, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form).
In the graph we see that the sum of actions move steadily a system to spend its motions, converted into information through 3 ages of growing warping, as most actions excluded death increase form, so we move from a young age of maximal entropy>motion into a balanced age of motion>reproduction to a third age of taking care of reproduced offspring>information to die in an entropic explosion that balances us, while leaving behind the immortality of our form NOT our ego IN OUR reproduced offspring that conserves the Universe in a dynamic present (hence the conservation of angular momenta, whereas lineal momenta is part of larger cycle, and energy, the sum of all those actions into a world cycle that closes into itself).
Welcome then to a description of reality as it is through its four components, @minds that gauge information about ðemporal informative cycles and $patial, entropic motions, across the infinite fractal coexisting scales of reality, which form with them organisms of spacetime, that live and die through worldcycles of existence, across all the scales of the fifth dimension.
We shall thus first study in the 2nd line the 10 isomorphisms across the 3 scales, and then study each scale and its 3 symmetric equations, defining its 3 elements, Sefield/spaces, STconstants of action and Tƒactive magnitudes and its ternary space topologies, 3 evolutionary ages and 5D actions across planes; fully developed on the 3rd line.
As we are all 5D space time organisms by observing man we can find this dimension. What indeed holds the ‘whole’? Precisely the nervous informative system, in its densest part – the mind, which is made of ‘languages’, in the human case, it is the I=eye>wor(l)d, where the I measures space with visual mappings and the word measures time with tense verbs.
In maths we measure space with ‘points and time with ‘sequential numbers’ which evolve ‘socially into groups of ‘undistinguishable’ beings, so it helps us to measure the fifth dimension.
VIII: IMMORTAL UNIVERSE
‘I want to know the thoughts of God not its details’ Einstein, on the goals of philosophers of science.
UPGRADING ASTROPHYSICS: THE ‘REAL UNIVERSE’ ONCE WE CORRECT ∆ST ERRORS
Astrophysics is concerned with the spacetime forms of all the known scales of physics, ∆i≤3, and the dark scale beyond the galaxy (∆±4) plus our • linguistic point of view, restricted TODAY by dogma of its earlier platonic practitioners to the single language of mathematics, as galileo affirmed and Dirac confirmed with no proof that ‘God only speaks mathematics’ which limits the ‘organic’ and ‘sentient’ properties we can describe on those system and give origin to the ‘naive realism’ and ‘reductionism’ proper of philosophy of physics today.
A such mathematical physics is concerned with all the elements of the Universe, reduced by ‘ideology’ to be shown in an abstract form to the mirrorimage that classic æmaths (with a single time aristotelian arrow and a single spacetime continuum) can provide.
And so its limits are those of the present state of evolution of its language, and of perception of man, in as much as the larger scales of the infinite Universe must be stretching both above and below those ∆±4 scales.
And so the task of GST in mathematical physics, should be the expansion of all those elements, starting from:
 Its expansion of the concepts of time and space, as shown in the graph, ‘first’ (as the primary language/substance origin of all realities).
 Then through the ‘expansion of mathematics with the ¬Æ improved definitions of fractal points with volume, ‘broken’ planes≈networks’ and ‘similarity≈ congruence’…
 Next we should try to correct with them, the three main errors of physics derived of those reductionist ∆•st views – namely entropyonly derived errors, bigbang cosmology and distortions produced by the need to ‘fit’ all realities within a single timespace plane, ignoring the ‘distortions’ of our perception caused by the different speeds of time and sizes in space of ∆scales (use of functionals, dark energy/matter, uncertainty/observer principles of quantum physics, etc.)
 And only then go through the different scales, studying in detail each equation and system, starting NOT from the bottom up, as if there was a causality of size, meaning smallish parts define the laws of larger ones, so quantum physics according to that view would matter more for philosophy of physics, but in the PROPER way knowledge comes to man – higher in detail and truth the closer we are to humanity, which means that:
 Mechanics (∆+1,+2) and thermodynamics (∆º,1) MUST BE the fundamental stiences of mathematical physics, with higher degree of perception≈certainty≈truth. As such they were indeed the first forms of mathematical physics discovered. And as Einstein and Planck thought should end up being the true reference for all other scales (‘statistical quantum physics will be equivalent to statistical thermodynamics’ Einstein). Next, we should study, the ∆≥±2, 3 scales (atomic and galactic scales) considering those distortions and only with some skepticism on what we can verify and truly know, consider the last ∆±4 dark world.
 And finally we MUST ad to physics the organic, mental, vital properties of physical systems, which the mathematical language will never be able to describe with OTHER languages of reality (biological and logic languages).
Yet even the classic scales (mechanics, thermodynamics) need corrections, because mathematical physics was born observing the galaxy, and its original postulates were distorted from the point of view adopted in that earlier age (Newtonian absolute space and time). And thermodynamics was born on the study of entropic weapons (cannons) and motion machines (steam).
However and this is the key to build properly the discipline, given the fact that physics, like chinese runs in two different language, one unified – mathematical equations/ideographic writing – and so accurate and better mirrored; and other based mostly on ‘different’ dialectical opinions (concepts of physics, philosophies of science derived of physics), we must accept mathematical physics is right and only interpret their equations properly.
The 3 examples taken here will suffice: Entropy equations are right. What is wrong is to reduce the arrows=actions of time to mere entropic motions as if the other two arrows=actions, information and energy did not matter as a fundamental time event… so physicists study them as something else. Hubble’s equation of expansion of vacuum between galaxies as light dissolves into the ∆4 >c scale is right; what is wrong is to ‘expand it back to the past’ into a supposed singularity where all time and space exists just by wishful thinking. quantum equations are right, what is wrong is the Copenhagen observers’ interpretation.
What physicists have so far done though, is without any PHILOSOPHICAL≈EPISTEMOLOGICAL rigour, to affirm that because they have written Chinese, they know how to pronounce it; and then of course each one says ‘ma’ with a different tone; and they just say but the equation is right. Sure, but how do you pronounce=translate into verbal, logic concepts? That is the key to make sense of the Universe.
And to prove that duality between right mathematical physics and wrong conceptual physics, we have divided this sections in two articles. One will be more concerned with conceptual errors and written first (astrophysics), as that is where GST can be applied.
Indeed the advance of GST on physics will come from the proper application of the higher layer of truth (the properties of space and time, applied through the isomorphisms and generator of fractal space and cyclical time) to illuminate first maths and its equations, and correct then those ‘opinions’ that today pass as scientific truths, since people are just in awe of the machines and measures of physics.
Thus we shall show how the whole of physics is inscribed into the linguistic ternary grammar of the Generator of Spacetime (Gst), and its isomorphisms. As all physical beings in all scales are ternary ∆±1, s,st,t, past>present>future beings. And so the laws and equations derived from the Fractal generator, apply to all system of physical beings, included the galaxyatom scale (∆±3) which is the last scale we perceive in depth.
So this paragraph has two themes: upgrading cosmology to the bare minimum to understand the Universe by introducing ∆§calling and ternary time arrows, and then having a few laughs at our popes of science, which don’t even know they know nothing about the whys that really matter in the classic manner of Latin rhetoricians, (‘contra physicos’) Why we do that ONLY with physicists and latter economists and its go(l)d religion should be obvious to any ethic reader:
The entropic world religion of physics and the go(l)d religion of economists is NOT science but an idology of power based in the use of entropic weapons (entropic metal now entropic machines) and informative money (informative metal: gold, silver, now emoney cycles in machines), which not only include gruesome errors on their models of reality but imperils the future and freedom of life in this planet, with massdestruction weapons robots automating Factories and terminators making money in splendid little wars and vigilante ebig brothers.
So ‘nothing personal’, even if in my life as an activist for life I have indeed had my battles against the nuclear industry which I will also disclose. Again, I love physics I despise physicists arrogance, ignorance of the living Universe and eviL=antilive military memes and distortion of the beauty of it all. And as I have zero hypocrisy I am not ‘greasing’ the a$$es of our tribal idols except when they deserve it (Leibniz not Newton, Planck, Broglie and Einstein not Bohr, Pauli and Heisenberg, Bohm and Bell not Feynman and Von Newman DID have it right both theoretically and experimentally, and always declined to work in the military industry unlike Newton designing weapons for the royal army, and all the others for the Nuclear Industry, still going strong). So before the laughs the warning:
‘Those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’ Einstein
Immortal Universe. Upgrading astrophysics’ 3 philosophical errors: bigbang, entropyonly & observer’s paradox.
In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein). So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: e=mcc + e=hƒ> mc²=hƒ> m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.
In the next graph, we see how the dark entropy that expands space between galaxies, is balanced by the informative vortices of mass of galaxies that convert entropy into virtual particles and masses according to the two sides of Einstein’s equation: E<CC>M, which he in fact published not to express the creation of entropy from mass, but the transformation of entropy>energy>mass and only when our military civilisation used it in reverse to explode atomic bombs, became canonised as an entropic equation.
In the graph, the Universe is eternal and bigbangs are likely only galactic bigbangs as Fred Hoyle wanted, which release dark entropy through the axis of black holes and expands space, balanced by the constant contraction by gravitational forces of space into mass.
So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and nofalsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.
Religious beliefs vs. realist stience
‘In 1952 I saw the impossible done. It was in papers by David Bohm. Bohm showed explicitly how parameters could indeed be introduced, into nonrelativistic wave mechanics, with the help of which the indeterministic description could be transformed into a deterministic one. More importantly, in my opinion, the subjectivity of the orthodox version, the necessary reference to the “observer”, could be eliminated. …
But why then had Born not told me of this “pilot wave”? If only to point out what was wrong with it? Why did von Neumann not consider it? More extraordinarily, why did people go on producing “impossibility” proofs, after 1952, and as recently as 1978? … Why is the pilot wave picture ignored in text books? Should it not be taught, not as the only way, but as an antidote to the prevailing complacency? To show us that vagueness, subjectivity, and indeterminism, are not forced on us by experimental facts, but by deliberate theoretical choice? (Bell 1982.)
We start the analysis of the equations of quantum physics, with a quote which is relevant at many levels specially in the understanding of quantum physics as just another scale of nature, not different from all others, on the ‘realist’ level, and the understanding of ALL what is wrong with the human psyche in his attempts to ‘understand the Universe’ as it is – merely ego.
The ego of mankind is huge and that of physicists enormous. So the answer to Bell’s question is selfevident. The Bohrs, Paulis, Von Neumanns of this world, care nothing about truth per se, but about ‘ego’, selfimportance of one’s own theories and WILL use the ‘objective supposed methods of science’ to advance his ‘interpretation’ of reality and the more so, when that interpretation works well with his ‘idologies’ of man as the only sentient intelligent being, which can even ‘determine’ as the ‘observer’, reality – create it, akin to God.
Mr. Bohm, though, a communist, expatriot, with little concern about his ego and an objective view of reality knew better, and his reward for being above those petty feelings, was to be an outcast all his life (as this writer, hence my personal feelings of admiration to his work), as the COPENHAGEN interpretation was an anthropomorphic, hence religious form of thought, as it is the bigbang treated elsewhere in those texts, and as such it was going to be defended with all the wrong systems of ‘belief’, which create a fog of noise around the naked truth, as it is.
It has passed now another 1/4 of a century since Bell wrote that text, even longer since Einstein rightly affirmed that “the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”, which is exactly what it is; a distorted ‘statistical’ view from the far removed human scale of the actions of particles, waves and fields; which only requires to acknowledge the ‘human bias’ (not the other way around, affirming the limits of human perception ARE limits of the particles and waves), the deformation of human languages upon the subject, accept though the practicality of those instruments, methods and languages of measure and dismiss 100 years of metaphysical bull$hit about it.
Bohm won’t see it happen, neither Einstein, Bell or this writer likely but perhaps in another century or so, humans will.
Now quantum realism is ‘normal’ every way we look at it. There is only a question, which is an experienced fact (hence nonarguable on theoretical qualms), and need an explanation classic physics does not provide – the nonlocality meaning v>c nature of the ‘quantum field’ underlying the action at distance of physical systems – both in the quantum and gravitational realm.
But this is what the metric equation of the fifth dimension provides, as the lower scales below the quantum realm of observable particles must have, accordingly a faster timecycle≈speed: Size x V(t) =K; and the ternary Generator of all physical systems, Sp(field) < st(wave)>Tƒ (particle), must have the three components to be complete, which requires the quantum nonlocal field of Bohm, besides the wave and particle state.
Bohm’s treatment was nasty to defend by all means Copenhagen, because one such obvious truth needs nastiness to be ‘censored’, with the usual ‘religious methods’ so abundant as ‘hidden variables’ of western tradition. Indeed, the only hidden variables on the argument between quantum ‘realism’ and Copenhagen ‘interpretation’ are the pseudoreligious arguments of Copenhagen (the very same names of both theories show indeed we should right away dismiss ‘an interpretation’ over objective realism, as IT IS what science seeks – realism NOT interpretation); since Bohm’s definition of the quantum field (the supposed notevident variable) IS extracted from the schrodinger’s wave in polar FORM – it is there and has always been there, when we change from waveformat to particlefield state, as the Universe constantly do in one of the most canonical dualities of reality. Systems ARE either in wavepresent state or pastfuture field/particle states. And this in mathematics means polar vs. cartesian formalism.
So by introducing a v>c ‘dark scale’ below light spacetime (the quantum field) and considering the three elements of a physical system together, GST provides the final freckles to make quantum realism sound theoretically and practically. Even if it takes away from ‘physicists’ their pretension to be the high popes of science, understanding the unique properties of the lowest scale of reality that according to their ‘selfish agenda’, must matter more than any other scale, just because is the one they study… which is at the core of his defense whatever it takes of Copenhagen and bigbang interpretations.
The bottom line of all this though is pessimistic, and perhaps the best answer to Bell came from Planck, the founder of quantum physics: scholars do not reason, they believe what they memorise; and so it takes many generations and overwhelming evidence for a ‘change of paradigm’ to happen, if ever it does so.
I have come to accept also this truth about the discoveries of GST, so the reader should forgive me for my growing indifference to my work, this site and the evolution of stience. If i could talk to Bohm or Bell i just would tell them to enjoy their view of the absolute and ignore ‘peers’. Bohm, I know for his holistic papers, did it. Bell untimely death cutoff his chances to push further quantum realism, and his third age of contemplation, where i now sit alone observing the 5D³ Universe, as Einstein and his disciple, Bohm, did, for so long.
So alas, physicists today have two philosophical false interpretations of reality that cater to their ego and they are comfortable with them: the bigbang or the larger scale, the Copenhagen interpretation in the lower one; and so they feel human intelligence ‘has closed’ reality above and below, with us in the centre as the only intelligence being who knows the beginning, the end, in time (bigbang), in space (quantumcosmological closure of scales), in language (only maths matter). So now you can spank the monkey and feel so happy to belong to such an entitled unique species, above heavens and Earth. Children of thought with an attitude – those are our leading masters of thought, per in secula seculorum, Amen.
We live today in a world dominated by the Germanic cultures of entropic war, which entered history calling themselves, Goths, Gods, because they could kill anyone who opposed them with lineal, simple iron swords, reached its global power through the use of weapons, conquering and exterminating many rival cultures that opposed them, till transferring its idols of metal and derived idologies to the rest of mankind.
Thus we must first clarify a first clash between the dual reality of a Universe dominated by the arrow of life and information vs. a human idology of weapons as the meaning of it all, which German physicists have sold as science, which affirms the only arrow of time of the Universe is entropy, meaning, fast, expansive, bomblike motions that kill and erase the information of life. So as death is both the beginning and the end of it all, it is Ok to murder life and evolve weapons; since even the Universe was born of a big bang, and will die into an entropic, expansive empty space.
How such a blunt theory of reality came into being the Universal Dogma of western thought is obvious: the Goth cult to lineal weapons, so intense that has even deformed its verbal mind with similar long agglutinative words which seem to be unbreakable truths often absolutely wrong simply has censored for centuries and purposely ignored the alternative arrow of information, calling it in fact, negantropy, the negation of entropy, as if information was a negative, irrelevant future.
Fact is languages information and the social, organic networks of life they create do balance the arrow of entropy and death, which moreover last a single quantum of time; while the arrow of life and information dominates the Universe because it takes much longer to happen and so occupies most of the time of reality; reason why we shall call information and its communicative use that create social networks, the dominant arrow of future of the Universe. While the brief moments of entropy and death, are local inverse processes of devolution and erasing of information, which we shall call for each fractal part of reality that dies away, its relative arrow of past.
Uncertainty, nonlocality, observer’s paradoxes, time quanta and simultaneity.
There is though a concept of great importance that has come up on this simplified argument on the foundations of physics on the limiting realms of quantum and cosmological scales: nonlocality and hidden variables, which bring a series of important consequences both to human stience and reality:
 It is obvious that the more removed we are in 5D scale, the more uncertainty we obtain in our analysis, hence the relative unimportance of physics in those realms to understand a Universe with likely infinite scales. Those scales are NOT more important and are MORE distorted to human observation, so they are less relevant for a philosophy of science. In Physics it matters more to understand the quite evident scale of thermodynamics, our scale. And when we do so, it becomes obvious as Einstein put it that ‘the statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”.
 It is also obvious that in the thermodynamic realm we must resolve also the cultural entropic error of the worldly profession of physicists and immediately observe the three ‘arrows’ o time as the state of physical systems. Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic bigbang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of spacetime actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3rd time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.
The 3 temporal dimensions or ‘states’ of matter, Spegaseous, energetic states, ST, liquid balanced states and Tƒ informative solid states, form together the 3rd isomorphism of molecular matter in its ∆+1 social scale. In the graph, again we can see how the introduction of scales and time ages solves the third main error of physics, one for each scale, in this case our thermodynamic ∆º scale considered wrongly to have only the entropicdeathweapon state, which as the graph shows is the entry to creation and death from the lower ∆1, scale of Plasma states in which particles are not organically put into a single ‘entity’ as in those solid states.
 Finally abounding on the uncertainty of measure, because time is quantic, discontinuous, cyclical, it can be only measured when a ‘cycle is completed’ as a unit of time (in humans the second)… but as 5D metrics allow different speeds of time, for a being with a measuring mind that has a huge length in its time quanta, all what happens within that time quanta of measure at faster speeds will seem simultaneous, nonlocal, even if the phenomena take some time to ‘travel’ from A to B, or from a,b,c… points into the synchronous knot of communication of them all.
Let us try to fully grasp this essential property of time, mind and measure. When a wheel turns fast you see it as solid, because you see simultaneously in your eyemind all what happens within a second and so all the points of the turning wheel might seem to be in the same point at the same time (within that second) even if IN A FASTER TIME SCALE, they will be recognisable pictured at slowmotion as clearly different rays.
This concept of simultaneity of measure embedded in special relativity is very relevant for many phenomena of perception, and stientific description of reality, as a source of much confusion when humans study in detail those so fast small scales of 5D.
The most obvious example is human thought – what we see as ‘simultaneous’ nonlocal IS the entire planet, because the speed of light is so great that all within a second, including the moon, seems to us ‘simultaneous, nonlocal, coexisting at the same timequanta’.
The light from that distant mountain you see below the horizon TAKES sometime to arrive here but it seems simultaneous, nonlocal in its ‘infinite speed’ to our one second senses, to the point that till the XVII century humans thought light was ‘instantaneous’ nonlocal as they could not even measure its speed. Galileo tried with mirrors in far away mountains, but the time of reaction of the person that had to stop the clock when emitting the ray and the one that received the ray and stopped his clock, which should allow to find a difference of time in both locations to measure the delay due to the motion of light between both points, was much larger (normally two seconds one to perceive one to act) than the millesimals it took light to go from Mountain A to Mountain B. Only when we did measures from far away Jupiter’s satellites we could get a meaningful measure.
Nonlocal quantum fields below light spacetime, the next scale which Bohm formalised must therefore be much faster than light, to the point of being seemingly nonlocal or else causality essential to time processes (even if sometimes is cocausality or multiple causal rays joined in a point) would not happen.
Normally those parameters that quantify the difference of speed (s/t), density (t/s) and momentum ( s x t) between scales and its species are on decametric, ternary potencies, as the 5D scales are. So ± 1, 10, 1oo, 1ooo, 10.000 are the commonest differences between scales. I.e. the fine structure constant, measure the difference between the light scale speed and the next upper ∆+1 electronic scale, around +100 (137). The difference of scaling between photons and electrons and the lower ∆1 scale though is larger. After all dense photons are just the ‘cellular’ level of electrons. So for complex more detailed reasons concerning the parameters of GST scaling, action at distance should be on the α² bidimensional speed scaling, compared to the larger, light world, around 10.000 times faster and all that happens in 10 thousand times more distance within the minimal quanta of human observation should seem to us NONLOCAL.
Actually recently a Chinese lab measured nonlocality which turned out to have a c=10.000 speed, for its ‘thinner’ minimal messages; or upper boundary of maximal speed of nonlocal effects; and so we do observe all kind of nonlocal c<V<10.000 C PHENOMENA, which of course theorist then vehemently deny to uphold its pretension of absolute truths under c speed.
The 3 dimensions of light spacetime. Its functions in all systems made of it.
Let us then now that we are dealing with minds, consider the meaning of faster than light speeds from the perspective of reproduction and perception of information. The mind’s quanta of time and speed simply cannot see ‘gravitational smallish, faster than light carriers of information’. But smaller particles do, as the dark work is ∆±4 and light, electrons and atoms exist in the neighbourhood: ∆±3,2.
So the dark world IS the ∆1: ‘energyfeeding level’ for a photon… reason why it follows as preypredators do the ‘scattering’ rays of Bohm’s pilot wave theory.
Don’t raise your eyes. We can explain all phenomena from all languages and povs. So as all has topobiological properties, we can always make an abstract mathematical explanation, in ‘detail’ but also a biological, organic explanation in ‘whole vital terms’.
Thus light merely warps≈feeds≈evolves the entropy of the lower scalefield, ∆1, which is invisible gravitation to us into visible information, and for that reason ‘as information must be copied and imprinted on the quantum potential field with no form, it takes time and reduces speed into clight.
Indeed, gravitation from our mind pov must have less information and more speed, as experiments prove (gravitational nonlocal, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information).
And if we plug this act into the equation of ‘cyclical timespeed’ it gives as an ∞ speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field:
v > $/ðƒ≈0 > s/0=∞:
In the graph, the infinite speed of the quantum potential of gravitation that feeds light, which follows the ‘string’ of gravitation, tended between the emitter and perceiver particle, which lock each other in entanglement, (neutrino theory of light) And so when both particles have connected through nonlocal action at distance in the dark world, they can guide their motions; they can assess their relative distance (which is the main information a single line provides) and as a secondary effect – since they are all ‘locked’ joined by the gravitational string, regardless of the external speed of their world, the speed of light communication between both will be always constant as they are in relative stillness to each other (explanation of the constant of c light speed from the •mind perspective).
The mind of man as Kant understood is EUCLIDEAN, because our space is Euclidean, and it is so because it is light spacetime, made of three perpendicular fields able to carry information: the electric, magnetic and cspeed field, the longest direction of view, which explains why we indeed look ahead in the horizontal plane, but have an informative head on the height direction of information as the electron which produces the ray of light does, moving up and down (left, bottom); and finally stores ‘energy’ in the width, MAGNETIC ‘BELLY’ direction (: ALL HAS changed in the evolution of light through 5D scales till creating man, but all has ultimately remained the same: a game of vital dimensions of spacetime.
Below we see the humind which better understood this paradox, Monet’s first ‘impression(ist): sunrise’ painting, in which space is no longer painted as ‘a background’ cartesian canvass, but as the frozen view of light rays by the human eye. Physicists though still don’t get what artists eyes saw intuitively. We shall in that sense consider the relationship of art with physics, as a pioneer of its spacetime analysis, from the work of Alberti on perspective, way before Desargues found projective geometry and Descartes the selfframe of reference, to the work of Leonardo, under his lemma of a living Universe of organic forms we must learn how to see (saper vedere), which certainly would have enjoyed immensely this blog and the part on topological vital spacetime, to the impressionist realisation light is the mind of space, to Picasso’s analysis of imaginary worlds made only with ‘lineal motions’ (cubism) or cyclic, reproductive yinfemale ‘forms’ (postwar period), to my own work as a painter with my ‘waves of timespace’ (graph with my 30 years old ‘eureka’ moment, when I first painted the fifth dimension)… on our analysis of the human mind, its artistic languages, and i<eye=wor(l)ds of spacetime.
In that sense the arts, which are specially gifted to reflect the game of the Universe from the pov of the humind are:
S: Bidimensional painting of sheets of STATIC information and how they evolve iTS dimensions, which did evolve into geometry through its renaissance masters.
ð: Music, which is as Schopenhauer understood the fundamental art of time, with its three dimensions of ‘scales’, ‘melody’, and ‘beat’. And again we find from Pythagoras through Plato, to this writer’s Phrygian mode symphonies, a conscious ever more complex consideration of Music as a perfect alternative vehicle to express ‘the world cycle of life and death with its up and downs, actions and survival emotions, since Music and sound is indeed the language of time in biological supœrganisms. (i.e. we feel ’emotional distress’ with growing treble, informative painful sounds, as the Doppler effect means a treble of growing pitch is a ‘predator’ coming; and peaceful feelings with Bassmoving away waves). We can in fact express any world cycle as a sum of discontinuous ‘fundamental tones’, each one expressing the arrowsactions of a mind of spacetime, as the Fourier transform show. And indeed, the first derivative equations of merit were found in the study of a violin string.
∆•: wor(l)ds, which were the final sound evolution from its simpler ternary and then 8+1 tones of music, into the 8 x 3 phonemes of words, which gave us a much larger range of ‘forms of thought’. So wor(l)ds evolved as the ethic, social messages of love that would evolve into new scales of the historic, human 5D.
It is for that reason that the wor(l)d of man, has always been better described by artists and ethic writers than by scientist, whose ‘concern’, valid as it is, has been mostly the Universe at large – in a parallelism we shall soon trace between western anthropomorphic wor(l)d religions and eastern, taoist, Universal ones. Hence the ridiculous egotist trips of modern nerd scientists who ‘despise’ humanities as irrelevant to the truth. They are explaining the same truths, merely with different languages, and different domains of analysis.
The consequences of the previous graph for the understanding of both the humind (human mind) and the external Universe of spacetime are multiple, from a proper understanding of special relativity to the analysis of magnetism as an independent force NOT an observer’s effect as modern physics think, to the fundamental analysis of light and photons as the minimal organism of our knownknown Universe, each of those themes exploring an element of the ∆•st light supœrganism.
How many scales? The discontinuous of finite infinities.
In the graph, the four dimensional volumes of spacetime scale in a series of levels or planes of existiences, in which similar species play a similar game to scale upwards and downwards. The volumes of spacetime, ∆º±1 scales around each Γ• Generator ternary system and singularity, is therefore the basic element of reality to classify it all in growing supœrganisms of increasing complexity, such as each new system humans perceive scientifically expands up and down the limits of the fifth dimension, in a game of growing russian dolls.
We humans perceive as selfcentred ∆º organisms, our mind languages and 4 scales above and below of which the ∆±4 scales.
So the question, as a full super organism has 10 scales, to fill its enclosure, is what is beyond our ‘open limits’ not perceived – where is the 10th dimension of the Universe, and its 9th dimension, as we humans are NOT ITS CENTER – mind singularity and membrane?
We shall never know regardless of the bigbang theory that establish them:
In the graph, while it could be easily built a bigbang theory of a ‘cellular universe’ of galaxies and its networks, but all seems to indicate that such ‘full knowledge’ is more of a hyperbolic human egotrip, as it is likely that each galaxyatom we observe is just a extremely limited quantity of the whole, and so our analysis is still egocentered, built with man at the center and an external ‘wall of fire’ membrane, whose time origin in the bigbang singularity can be pictured symmetrically in ‘simultaneous space, as the 10th dimension with the ‘big attractor’, pole of maximal informative=graivtational density in its center (left up graph). Below a more organic interpretation of what we perceive, eerily similar to the electric field of a ‘wave’ of light made of ‘photons’…
This of course is natural as all scales are selfsimilar so we can show analogies with all of them, but in true form there is not enough information and should never be in the finite space and time of the human species to fully figure out what kind of system is the Universe. It doesn’t really matter As it is far more important than a ‘picture’ in still space of a larger piece of it, to understand its symmetries and inner laws.
So the largest scale, ∆4 the cosmos is grounded on the ∆4 infinitesimal ‘dark entropy and dark matter’, and its minimal nonperceived particles, (gravitons, neutrinos, strings, whose proper definitions and correct formalism we shall study in the first scalar analysis of the fourth line: ∆4).
Next comes the galactic/atomic, ∆±3 scale, in which a galaxy composed of a central black hole, ∆+3: BH, itself grounded in the smallest densest particles of mass, ∆3: quarks, controls its surrounding stars/electrons and inner vital space of electromagnetic and gravitational forces.
So in the next scale of reducing size converging into the human mind that observes it all, we see the relationship between ∆2 solar systems and its ∆2, ‘minimal part’, light and electrons (themselves dense fractal aggregations of photonic lights).
And in this scale we find associated to solar singularities, their ‘cyclical membranes’, rotating planets with more angular momentum… ∆2: gaia, which we study in more detail through its three ages of evolution from the earth of life, Gaia proper, into the earth of man, history and soon to come the earth of metal machines.
So finally in our shrinking realisation of the game of supœrganisms, of decreasing complexity we arrive to the systems of life, ∆+1, among them humans, which are themselves made in its smaller parts of ∆1, molecular RNADNA or in the organic arena, ∆+1 matter states made also of ∆1 inorganic molecules.
And so finally we arrive to the ∆•º singularity of the cell, the mind of man also, being a network of cells, the brain. And so the brainmindneuronal network is where the ego and the human infinitesimal mind should exist.
The fourth and final line of the site thus will study for each of the main fractal levels, ∆¡, and its ∃xi=st¡ences in the Universe, between the selfsimilar forms of an atomic nuclei made of light quarks with an overall positive charge and a galactic black hole likely to be a swarm of top quark++ frozen stars (Einstein’s expectations that a black hole should have a cutoff substance, a new type of ‘atomic matter’ of ‘high density’, becoming a ‘frozen star’, which the discovery of top quarks of similar density to black holes seem to prove); its main species:
∆4 neutrinos, ∆3, atoms, ∆2,photons and electrons, ∆1, molecules, ∆º cells… which happens to be the middle state of perception of man, as an M³: monadmindmirror of the Universe, NOT as egocentered humans think and anthropic physicists, because it is the absolute centre of the Universe, but because there is a perfect symmetry between ∆±1 range of informative perception for each ∆º being, both at ‘real level’ (galaxy and atom) and at theoretical level (Planck strings and cosmic strings)…
So above the cell/neuron of human perception we then grow upwards with the different ‘orientation’ of perception towards larger wholes, which changes to elliptic ‘darkness’. And so we shall study first the human scales, with more detail (as the praxis of stience must serve mankind): ∆º cell, ∆+1 life (and its variations of inorganic ∆+1 matter states and ∆+1 human life), ∆+2, the world level, of which we shall study its temporal equation and three relative subspecies: Pastlife (gaia and its life supœrganisms)<Present(History, the supœrganism of mankind in time)> Future (companymothers of machines and its world$tock networks of financial money), to finally enter in the higher scales of the Universe, ∆+3 galaxies and its relative cells, stars systems; considering finally the ∆+4, ‘philosophical’, metaphysical questions about the cosmos as we do not have enough proofs and will never have due to the limits of perception of systems reduced to 9 scales of the whole…
Thus after introducing in the main article of the fourth line each of those species, no longer as in the 2nd line with a classic scientific perspective, but with the 10 isomorphisms of T.Œ and its stiences, we do study in 10 separate subposts the species in great detail showing all its laws can be reduced to the 10 ∆ºst isomorphisms of the being.
This fourth line is not completed and i doubt i will finish it before my death but should work as a blue print for future human or robotic species to continue the growth of this web. Yet when I introduce some info in one of its subposts I change its name slightly from the 1 to 10 list that appears in the left side column of the web to a more ‘proper name’. For example for matter, the fifth isomorphism of time ages becomes ‘states of matter’; in humans the isomorphism of the mind becomes different mind languages – art, wor(l)ds etc.
The ∞ scales of reality.
We have wide proofs of 10 c to 100 c=z speeds of recession of galaxies, which correspond to the dark world of entropy and dark matter beyond galaxies, which should structure the cosmos.
If cspeed were the limit of the Universe, then there would not be another scale on it. This is selfevident. So we wouldn’t have a cosmological atom, but the scale of atomgalaxies would be the higher and vice versa, per symmetry we would be selfcentred in scales, as we are in the middle of the lower scales. As this seems merely anthropomorphism, we can consider the galaxyatom is the next ‘beginning’ of a vast game we cannot even imagine. In the next graph we can see different models of the fifth dimension.
The first one corresponds to one biased by ∆º, which observes equal amount of distorted information moving downward or upwards in scale, hence it seems to us equal the ∆±1 quantum and electromagnetic scale. This solution however can be a ‘closed’ hyperbolic solution in which the mind is truly watching above and below the ‘same’ reality; or a selfsimilar solution in which each 11th scale coincides but the size is completely opposed, infinitesimal and infinite.
On the right side, we observe a lineal solution with similar concepts, the bottom and top are the limits of size and there are no more levels of perception. In the middle the one which better suits the knowledge I have acquired on those scales – a minimal Riemann surface, in which the imaginary scale repeats the surface, regardless of size (a parameter not considered), in a series of ’emerging centres, perceived from the upper scale as mere pointssink of the lower one.
∆nalysis becomes the most important branch of mathematical physics.
Since as we enter into more complex, accurate models it will be the bidimensional complex plane the best way to parametrize and model 5D reality, whereas the real part will mostly represent entropic, expansive motions and the imaginary part informative, ‘smaller’ extensions (but denser in information); and its combinations energy waves.
Alternatively the other great ‘unknown’ to represent spacetime scales, is the duality of o1∞ scales of reality, such as the 01 circle represents a whole, part of a 1∞ scale and both are in correspondence in various ways.
In the central graph we see the simplest of such ‘models’ (2 Dimensional):
A Riemann’s minimal family of complex surfaces with an infinite number of endpoints particles asymptotic to parallel planes, each plane “shelf” connected with self points that act as catenoidlike bridges between 5D shelves.It perfectly represents the downwards entropic death motion, after a particle reaches its singularity. Notice that the fall of the particle is two planes of the fifth dimension as it enters the gutter and crosses without entering the intermediate, ∆º scale.
Moreover, their intersections with horizontal planes are informative circles or entropic lines, according to the duality of its functions.
Riemann proved that they were the only minimal surfaces fibered by circles in parallel planes besides the ‘STcatenoid wave’, the Thelicoid and the Splane (3 essential forms in the mathematical formalism of 5D). They are also the only nontrivial embedded minimal surfaces in Euclidean 3space invariant under the group generated by a nontrivial translation, a key element to formalize all the possible motions through the fifth dimension.
As such some geometric constructions of the complex plane are the best mathematical representations of fifth dimensional subequations of the function of existence and its worldcycles, and its systems of parts (the plane) ‘shelfcentred’ in a particlepointmind connected with paths that respect the principle of ‘minimal timeactions’ (Fermat’s principle) of all systems, and connected to other planes through ‘entropic lines’ and time circles. And the simplest, first ‘form’ of the topological ‘analysis’ of the fifth dimension in its more complex mathematical formalisms, we might develop, lifetime permitted in the four line of this web.
Another way to look at it though is to consider that in each point of reality there is a ternary scalar structure of three time arrows as there is a ternary organic structure of three organic parts and then a discontinuous membrane in space, which cuts you partially from the outside reality, such as there is more information within you that between you and the outer world. So you are a finite being in space. So happens with birth and death, which are your finite limits in time, such as there is far more time motions within your life than in your emergent foetus state and your dissolving entropic death.
And for the same reason in scales of existence, an organism is really a finite ∆º±1 being, as below the cellular level and above the world level there are cut offs that make irrelevant the outer scale. Indeed, it does not matter much the galaxy you are in, beyond the solar system and its oort membrane that isolates you, and provides you within all entropy, energy and information. So for all practical senses, as you are not really outside your skin, beyond your death, you are not really concerned above the sun’s membrane.
And viceversa, as your existence below the seminal, seed, informative level matters little, beyond the cellular, molecular level it does NOT matter what indistinguishable atoms you are made of. Your atoms can be any carbon atom as they are INDISTINGUISHABLE bits for the creation of the information you are.
Hence the question of ∞ scales, which will be the most likely hypothesis as atoms and galaxies will show an astounding selfsimilarity, becomes irrelevant from the praxis of a ‘spiritual universe’ of intelligent motions, where ‘form, substance’ are secondary, and perception of information limited in each ‘ghost of existence’ to its ∆±1 scales.
What is the special role of man on this infinite fractal? None. And all, because the game of existence in the Universe, closely understood in Asian philosophies (as yin=visnu=information=time=female vs. entropy=yang=shiva=space=male were a close verbal account of it) suffices in itself for those who want to ‘live’, to maximise their existence.
Indeed, life is beautiful when properly understood and fulfilling; but the game of existence as a spacetime being is harsh and it can be cruel with those who do not play by the rules. One thing is for sure, the game is JUST, balance as it based precisely in the ‘coincidentia oppositorum’, the coming together of its two extremes, entropy and information, which mix to create the infinite forms of energy of the Universe. You will have though to read at least 30 pages of this introduction to change your chip, and understand… It suffices to say that the people who closer understood it in the western tradition, the Greek and German philosophers, above them Aristotle and Leibniz felt it was the most perfect of all possible worlds. And it is, precisely because of its cruelty with those species who do NOT make the cut, and become extinct, for the game to have all its beauty.
And that is where the western tradition, which constantly tries to ‘dialog’ with an inexistent ‘mirrorGod’ to get privileges, stumbles and makes the type of huge errors of conduct – since the game is one of behaviour, of forminaction of information – which come back to hunt them. As you should ‘do onto others what you want to be done onto you’, in the actionreaction processes of life and death.
III.
DUALITY AND SYMMETRY: S=T
HOLOGRAPHIC & TRINITY PRINCIPLES:
TIME MOTION VS. SPATIAL FORM, SPATIAL CONTINUITY VS. TIME DISCONTINUITY.
A true understanding of reality in its fundamental logic principles is missed among huminds because the founders of modern science missed the notso ‘evident’ visual duality of the Universe between the 3 motions of time (lineal t, iterative hyperbolic ∏, cyclical ð) which form billions of different beings in all scales of reality, and its 3 fixed forms as perceived by its ∞ monads≈ §patial minds, @, which stiffen those motions into forms (lineal distance, $, hyperbolic bidimensional space curvatures, S and cyclical spaceinformation, §).
And the other two logic dualities between lineal, flat, small, open and cyclical, large, closed forms; and small discontinuous and large continuous parts. The 3 dualities we illustrated with the picture of Saturn’s rings also discovered by Galileo ARE all over the place in mathematical physics (i.e. lineal small steps of momentum described by Newtonian 2nd law vs. closed cyclical energy paths in the Hamiltonian/Lagrangian formalism; ∆1 quantum discrete eigenvalues in quantum physics vs. continuous differential equations in the other extreme of ∆+1 gravitational relativity, algebraic still ‘Groups’ vs. analytical ‘steps’, matrix’ Heisenberg descriptions vs. wave Schrodinger’s dynamics, etc. etc.).
It is then all the more surprising that a serious philosophy of dualities and ternary symmetries have never been explored. How is this, has to do with the automaton, mechanical praxis of modern science. In fact, the years I tried to spread among scholars 5D², as the world chair of the science of duality in the milieu of systems sciences, I was receiving questions about the ‘utility’ of this work which simply puzzled me about the nature of the humind, as I live in awe of those symmetries, like the one just explained between simultaneous superorganisms and time worldcycles. And simply concluded that huminds are not much interested in ‘the territory of truth, which is like a path on a cliff, a thin line we fear to walk through’… as a polish poet concluded. Poetry indeed being the higher Disomorphic form of verbal mirrors.
But it is not the mathematical formalism as mirror of reality truth? It is, but only a single mirror of the poetic disomorphisms of the universe, which are all based in symmetries, dualities and ternary forms.
But, and this is the biggest handicap of mankind, huminds are selfcentred and onedimensional. They want single truths. They abhor polidimensional views, as the Universe abhors vacuum – a meaningless word as all space has motion, and all time has form, and when both do not exist nothing exists.
So the concept of multidimensionality, symmetry, duality and ternary forms puts illatease most huminds. And yet without exploring the dualities and ternary symmetries of space and time dimensions we cannot start the game of existence we all play.
Of them, the most important trinities is that of coexisting planes in super organisms, the present scale, and then two ‘extra scalar dimensions’, entropy or dissolution, 4D and social evolution into wholes rule by singularity minds, 5D.
Of all this humans understand very little as they are ‘evident beings’ with a hard time looking at time, specially at the future, with its intelligent variation, always focused in the past, with its memorial forms. So we shall repeat the basic notions of reality hoping the human or robotic ‘future’ reader can memorize them.
Now we shall bring a new fundamental law or fundamental symmetry between space and time states, which illuminates its constant interaction.
As we cannot distinguish time from space states, they must appear as ‘pairs’, but as time is always a sequential flow those pairs must appear consecutively, and we shall call that flow of sequential states of which there are only 5 dimensional variations, THE 5 motions of time & space:
t≈t (3D), s≈s (1D), s<t+t>s (2D), ∆1 s>>∆+1 s (5D), t+1<<t1 (4D)…
A minimal MOTION in time and/or space, thus becomes the fundamental ‘dynamic flow’ of reality. Let us see then how the Universe moves through ‘repetitive’ or ‘s<≈>t’ feed back variations.
Motion and form, the two elements that combine into energy beings.
This is the fundamental principle of physics, called the principle of relativity:
“We cannot distinguish a motion from a still dimension (form or distance).’ Poincare…
‘as each dimension of space= form is accompanied b a dimension of motion=time, ST≈ST≈ST’.
SO WHAT WE CALL MOTION IS IN FACT A BEAT OF CHANGE, AN SS, OR TT, OR ST OR TS STEP… in a constant formmotion, informationentropy, perceptionreproduction ststst beat; as all motions can be reduced to that constant reproductive beat.
Let us then explore the concept of ðime cycles as carriers of information, and its three arrows and the systems made with them as organic elements, entropic limbs/fields, bodywaves and informative particleheads – its simultaneous perception in §pace – departing from its simplest forms, which are topological bidimensional forms.
So what IS the proper way to make sense of the galilean paradox?
Conceptually the way to go is to accept the stop and go, the dual dimensionality of all systems which are motion and form, momenta, energy, and so we move from Galilean relativity, the single being, to the holographic principle, the mind seeing it as dual motions and forms.
BUT AND THIS IS THE BREAKING INSIGHT, the still view is that of the mind – the motion view that external to our mind. So we must recast the question of relativity:
‘why minds still the motion of the Universe” And how this through relativity, distort our intaking of information as human beings?
The answer is ontological: to perceive you need a still mind mapping; motion is unfocused, and adds too much information which a small mind cannot fit if it wants to portrait a still , perceivable image of reality. THUS PARTICLEHEAD states are informative minds that stop, and wave states move the system.
But why we do see form with the mind, motion when we adopt an external point of view? To understand why we have to understand first the mind.
Because IT IS OBVIOUS THAT WHAT WE SEE AS SPACE IS A MAYA OF THE MIND, WHICH CAN BE MATHEMATIZED, OR TALKED ABOUT OR PICTURED, BUT STILL WILL BE THE ELECTRONIC MIND AND ITS CAPACITY TO PERCEIVE LIGHT IN ‘STOPNESS’ (Constancy of cspeed, which conceptually means simply, we, or rather our ‘electronic minds’ – and the electronic digital minds of atomic computers – SEE LIGHT as stopped in its source, with always the same speed.
The mind is as in that case, since electrons ‘perceive’ waves of light as stopped photons, always present in the way mankind perceives, measures, and so with its electronic instruments.
So let us then consider what the mind is, as it is obvious that there is a feedback equation going on in reality:
§@ ≈ ∆ ð
The Universe is made of ‘Motion and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind thinks otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox – the duality of stillness and motion, as we perceive the Earth still but it is moving.
Yet this paradox is indeed the proof that form, information dominates motion, because the mind prefers to see still information to blurred motion.
The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.
This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.
So often we see motion as distance – we cannot distinguish motions from dimensions of form (this is the meaning of relativity, the relativity of all motions).
The duality of motiondistance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.
It manifests in different forms in different scales. Perhaps the most important expression is the duality waveparticle, still ill understood in quantum physics.
We shall consider of its many consequences 2 of them – an objective explanation of the constancy of light speed from relativity and a footnote on its duality in quantum physics.
The physical world is dual from ‘above’ (the cosmic scale) to ‘below’ (the quantum scale), to quantum discrete motion to go ‘actions’, from the duality of motion vs. still perception or ‘Galilean>Einsteinian relativity’, to the basis of our understanding of science is the finitesimal small vs the finitely large (infinities do not exist in the metrics of the 5th dimension, hence the use of finitesimals and finite, minimal and maximal n1 quanta and U+1 worlds).
EINSTEIN’S RELATIVITY: adapting discontinuous scalar spacetime to continuous single spacetime.
Now, the next instalment of the analysis of galilean relativity between motion and stop was einstein’s special relativity and again, he, unaware of the duality of dimensions of motion and form, merely went further into the obsession of measure, translating the effects of ‘warping’ of space that shortens it, when information is imprinted by light in the previous quantum potential of lineal form, adding to the measure a ct factor of warping. This was special relativity concerned with that translation to our world where we do not see the quantum potential – hence we add the warping to scale up the process into our ‘terse’ spacetime.
And further on, we do not see the stop and go of particles and waves, and so we added the lorentz transformations to compensate in our continuous Universe, and in this manner special relativity maintained the fantasy of a continuous derivative motion universe (when it is a stop and go), and a single spacetime (when it is a scalar spacetime warped in the whole scales).
Motion and form go in pairs, advancing spacetime.
The st beatings of the Universe define 4 dimensions immediately of motion, s≈S, T≈t, S<T, T<S, which are the four fundamental motions of the Universe. BEING THE FIFTH DIMENSION, the no motion of them all in the still pure spacetime of the Mind, @.
So departing from 4 motions, we must first consider if an S≈s and a t≈T is motion: it is in the scalar growth OR DIMINUTION. WHILE the stop and Tgo, Stop, Tgo motion and form gives us the other two:
we cannot see motion and form together, the whole and its parts, we confuse lineal detailed view in short spacetime intervals with cyclical, larger slower view… such galilean paradoxes are the reflection of Space=time dualities that the mind tries to ‘conform’ into spacesimultaneous view to ‘perceive them’. (Perception being always in spacesimultaneity as still form a quanta of space=time).
The Universe is a fractal superorganism of 5 dimensions of spacetime, where the fourth dimension of parts and the fifth dimension of wholes create its scalar, organic structure, as it is made of smaller and larger super organisms of spacetime.
Those super organisms follow a fundamental logic rule, which started modern science – the realisation that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from form’ (Poncaire, Principle of Galilean relativity) according to which all motions in time can be seen as formdistances in simultaneous space and vice versa.
So we conclude that spacetime, what we perceive as motion and form is composed of 5 dimensions of space undistinguishable of its equivalent perceptions as motions of time, hence:
5 D ST = 5 Tmotions + 5 S motions (S=t).
This simple equations of the logic behind galilean relativity will suffice to explain all what exists.
As it happens two immediate consequences of the formulae is that being S=T, the maximising function of S x T (S+t being equal to K, in this case 10 dimensions), what the Universe maximises is Sxt+S=t, which given the relationship between space and information and time and entropy we write as exi+s=t, which is the function of existence of the Universe, maximise your function of existence is what all systems, do.
How we do it? Obvioulsy maintaining the balance at S=T. AND SO THE LAW OF BALANCE FOLLOWS, OF ACTION REACTION, OF ETERNAL CONSERVED MOTIONS IN THE UNIVERSE.
The simplicity of the first beats of existence, S=t, s=t, and its s=s, t=t apparent congruencies is only the beginning of an incredible adventure, the motions of reproduction of information across the five dimension of spacetime that we call reality.
The first beats of existence.
We start with 2 states: spaceform and motiontime. Space is the mindintelligence, motion the constant original substance the minds try to stop.
The mind tries on the other hand to be also in constant motion, switching perspective not to be bored, so stop and go, but as go is reproduction of form, is really inform and reproduce, and reproduction being st, and inform, @S.
The maximisation of an s=t balance happens obviously with the maximal number of s=t beats, as s and t become equalised by smaller moments and forms of it, the moving reproducing st>t>st>t ‘actual beat’ is sparkled by explosions of Ss,death.
RECAP.The 5s +5t=10 Disomorphic spacetime organisms & the Galilean paradox.
The Galilean paradox simply means there are two realities, as Descartes, founder of modern science, its method and mathematical frame of reference, rightly understood. One the @mind, which creates the fixed forms of ‘fractal §pace’ we observe (ab. @, §): §@≈∆ð.
The equation with 5 symbols, each representing one of the dimensions of the Universe of spacetime is a conceptual logic deduction of the Galilean Paradox, that expands the concepts of Galilean relativity and Einstein’s relativity to the Absolute relativity of the fractal Universe. So it is worth to detain ourselves in their understanding.
So if we consider spaceform and timemotion in its 3 parallel ‘lineal, cyclical and mixed, hyperbolic forms’ we can define 3+3 Ds:
 @: $, S, §: The perception of time cycles by an spacemind, still, linguistic, mirror of the whole Universe, which ‘seems’ in words of Descartes a devilish virtual form put on the mind. As the mind, @, generates it; we cannot deny this spatial virtual reality, even if it is not the ultimate motion reality. As the mind generates a still=spatial reality, ab. §, we need to describe also space, as generated linguistically by minds in synchronous mappings. We use again different symbols for the different ‘dimensions’ of space: $ for lineal formdistance, S, for the combined waveforms and § for cyclical and lineal space, which is CAPitalized as present is its dominant element.

 ∆: t, T, ð: An absolute external Universe, made of scalar dimension, which in each one of them shows 3 varieties of motion, lineal time motion (t), cyclic time motion, ab.ð, and its ‘combinations’ for which we shall use the CAP symbol T, as present is dominant. Where ð cyclical time is measured by frequency, ƒ=1/t, inverse to lineal time s all has in detail motion, and it is structured in ‘scales of space’ (ab. ∑§) or rather ‘planes’ (ab. ∆=∑§).
 ≈: Operandi that relates them, most often a relative equality. Since the only way we can make logic sense of it is to consider that the mind view of reality in space is parallel, similar, congruent, equal but NOT identical TO THE OUTSIDE UNIVERSE IN MOTION=TIME, with real obvious fractal scales from minimal forms in space to maximal forms.
The inverse properties of cyclic time and lineal space.
How can we translate the dualities of line and cycle, motion and form? They are inverse in a logic and geometric way. So we can describe easily the concept of space time inverted properties with a hyperbole. We shall find then that hyperbolic functions, such as e, are fundamental to define the different transformations between space and time:
In the graph a hyperbolic function between a line and a cycle. In general certain cyclical curves follow the relationship between a point of time and a lineal distance of motion.
The Universe is a 5 Dimensional fractal that reproduces vital topologies of timespace, ternary forms of motion and form, which organises into larger, slower scales of fifth dimension of ðime§pace.
Motions on 5D are either topological βidimensional changes (Galileo’s paradox) in D³, or full worldcycles (motions in 5D), and so we must be aware of both.
The main bidimensional motions of a spacetime being are motions with form, bidimensional units of:
§, $: Lineal form x Lineal form=plane of spacedistance
E, ∃: max. motion x min. form = wave of energy, entropy, expansive motion
ð: min.. motion x max. form= cyclical time, information, harmonic motion
ƒ: max. form x max. form= informative time, implosive motion.
This initial conditions set the combinatorics of topological motions as each of those bidimensional elements combine with other forming ternary, fullyfunctional, efficient systems, Γ• that can act feed, perceive, move and reproduce and evolve socially, the five actions, of survival of the vital program of any fractal of information of the Universe.
This basic motions then become repetitive in fractal selfsimilar beings as each compose motion leaves a memorial trace of previous traces that continue being traced in the same place ‘reproducing the facto the being’.
In this manner physical systems grow in form and dimensions:
Thus the CONSTANT AMBIGUITY in normal and scientific discourse, which confuses entropy and energy on one side and form and information. We can’t escape that ambiguity so we often confuse terms entropy and energy and form and information but we will try to BE PRECISE, when writing equations or explaining fundamental facts.
SO WE TRY TO DIFFERENCIATE ENTROPY AND ENERGY, and CALL FORM, in/form/ation, as here the ambiguity is far more entrenched in the normal discourse, so when we highlight form, we use ƒ and in/form/ation.
For example in E=mc²; E is e, entropy not Energy; m is ðime, an inward vortex of gravitational forces (principle of equivalence of acceleration and mass), and the energy is c x c a wave of light ðime§pace, whose hyperbolic form is in fact a combination of the cyclical mass form and the lineal, expansive entropy of the explosion.
For example, in ‘colour codes’ used by minds to differentiate the four terms, blue is the colour of pure form, red the colour of pure entropy, and its combinations are green the reproductive colour of information with more form and yellow, the colour of energy with more motion. And so the brain classifies reality with those two extreme and two intermediate colors, and we shall observe that all mindlanguages are combinations of those four elements.
Some languages are simpler, and then we have the two unperceived limits, black of form, white of entropy and combined greys. Words also have:
Formsubject (human) < energeticinformative verb or ‘action’momentum: e x i > Entropy of subject (object ab=used by the subject).
Since existence is a game of those 2, 3, 4 elements/dimensions of reality. So we define a conceptual acronym, the ‘Function of existence’:
Entropy x form = energy + Information
But in a license of the inherent ambiguity of those terms we write: e x i = st entropy x Information = ðime§pace Momentum (integrated for a long period as Energy).
To exist is thus to combine entropymotions and information, form, in a series of actions of existence, pure motions, energy feedings, perception of forms, communication of information, reproduction of both, social evolution with other forms through ‘ties’, which are flows of sharing of those elements…
Do not be scare by the ambiguity of terms, try just to realize the deep connections between them at a topologic level of form and function and when you are familiar you will learn to see reality in a much deeper way. To help we shall consider a simplified graphic of the two poles, temporal form and lineal entropy, and its energyinformation combinations.
I apologize because I tend to use information instead of form, very often as my texts of 30 years of lonely research started with the simplified model of energy and information (as that is what we perceive)
It is important though to be precise when using those terms in equations and detailed descriptions of beings and its events. So the first question is how can we measure those terms? Even if we don’t perceive. Alas! the Universe is wise and has given us ‘parameters to measure’:
PURE §pace can be measure as DISTANCE and size, S. Pure form can be measured by the frequency of the cycles of the formclock, ƒ, which in turn becomes perceivable externally as ‘density’, ‘inertia’, ‘mass’ and similar terms for each scale.
Once those dualities are understood, we can compare the properties of both, spatial entropy>energy and temporal form< information, observing the inversion of its qualities and yet, in as much as both have the same number of dimensions, energy and information can transform one into the other by transmuting those properties:
Time cycles, Tƒ Vs X Entropic Space, ΣEs ≈STmomentumactions energetic information
Timeclocks: Oform Vs. Space motion: Lineal ≈ waves
Small, still Vs. Large, moving fast ≈ Open curves
Tall, Perpendicular Vs. Long, Parallel ≈ wide, intersecting
Hierarchical Order Vs. Democratic chaosfreedom
Bidimensional Height Vs. Bidimensional Length ≈ tridimensional entity
Cyclical, Rotation, imploding Vs. Lineal, uncoiling, exploding = beating rhythm
Informative Frequency Vs. Lineal Speed = momentum
Broken form Vs. Continuous, differentiable
Intelligent, perceptive Vs. Strong, fast. = energetic top predator
Social, organic, creative Vs. Darwinian, destructive behaviour =
Future, logic path Vs. Past, trailing motion
Life arrow Vs. Death arrow. = existential world cycle
Waves of §pace Vs. Particles of Time
Female, yin principle Vs. Male, yang principle = reproduced child
Masses, charges Vs. Forces, fields = energy
Heads & senses Vs. Limbs = Bodies.
The formal=functional differences between entropy and information (organs) is a duality – the ‘Black hole Law’:
Limbs/fields of Maximal Space=Entropy x Min. Form Vs.Max. speed of Information=Minimal Spatial extension= heads & particles
For example, as the chip becomes smaller halving its size every 2 years it doubles its capacity to process information (‘Moore’s Law) The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate information, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster communication takes place within that brain and the faster it calculates and processes information in a logic manner.
If we consider that each being can be in a time or state of space, the question now is. What defines then its state?
In mathematical terms the answer is its curvature, its form, FORM becomes then the definitive element of being, as you cannot change so fast from cyclical to lineal form and viceversa, as you can between state of form and state of motion.
Cyclical time and the world cycles of existence of beings, made of a sum of ‘actions’, which become ‘arrows of time’ (spatial entropy, temporal form and its e x i =st combinations) which are ordered in sequential world cycles of time, which gives us the sensation of a cyclical time program of past to future, which we can also see as a sum of synchronous minds in which ‘knots’ of timespace actions converge, through several coexisting scales.
Duality. The inverse properties of space and time.
All this resumes into the duality states of reality between a timelike state of motion and one of perception… s>t<s>t beats of existence define motionformmotion waveform particle – motion single present space – information particle at rest in motion with ∆±1 scales… motions and forms across the three scales of ∆ s and t become then the first variations of reality, since when we realise we can play with 3 x 3 motions up and down stairs of ∆ topologies of space ages of time and combine them, the iterative game of timespace beats becomes truly a fractal infinite of timespace.
The simplest physical beat is between the spacelike state of the wave in a present motion through a single plane of continuum existence and the stop state of the particle, in informative perception through the axis that connect its singularity as a field of force with the upper and lower ∆±1 scales of existence, absorbing entropy from the lower scale (reducing its field space in an attractive vortex and emitting pure entropic faster than the wave speedlines through its axis:
The line or shortest distance between 2 points and the cycle that stores the max. quantity of information in lesser space. Both combine to reproduce the infinite beings of reality. It is the game of existence we all play.
The Principles of reality: Spacetime Duality. Ternary organs and ages. 4 åctions. ∞ Fractal Universes.
The integration of all sciences in one is the goal of General Systems Sciences or Complexity. At Macy’s the year of Einstein’s death, the highest minds of mankind came together and realized that physics had its limits and lacked despite its exhaustive understanding of Entropy and motion (as that was its purpose since its inception by Galileo) a full comprehension of information, the other element of which the simplest Universe is made.
They also realized that the mechanist view was too simple and rather theological because as Leibniz put it, needed a God that started and created the mechanism. So for the future evolution of a more comprehensive theory, they considered that all the ‘systems’ of the Universe (anything that exists), there should be at least two elements, defined by their form and function, both related to each other: Entropy or entropy or space (any expansive motion, hence perceived as extended, planar or lineal space) and information or form or time (implosive motion, hence perceived as implosive, cyclical motion). This realization is the principle in which the 5 dimensions of the Universe are based. Since we can say as Taoists philosophers that from ‘1 comes 2, from 2 comes 3’ and add ‘from 3 comes 4, from 4 comes 5 and from 5 dimensions come all the beings of the Universe’:
 Duality: The spacetime of the Universe is made of quantum of 2 types of motions: Lineal Entropy and cycles of times, whose frequency carries the information of the universe. As proved by Planck: ∑ Sp X Tƒ =K
 Trinity: All organic systems have a head made of cycles of times, limbs of quantum energies, combined in a body that reproduces both making this logic structure of motions to survive.
 5Dimensionality: Such organisms survive by performing 5 åctions. Entropy feeding, informative perception, reproduction and social evolution as herds, ∑ and networks, ∑^{2}=∏.
 The orgasm mandate: Each mathematical point of view, or diffeomorphic, local entity of spacetime will perceive reality from its own point of view and try to maximize its existence as a complementary system, ∑Sp X Tƒ=k, this is achieved at points S=T and max. ∑.
 The meaning of existence. Thus all systems try to achieve Max. ∑Sp X Tƒ=k. We call this the mandate of existence: grow in spatial Entropy and temporal information: ‘Grow and multiply… in balance between mind and body.’
What this meant is that all what you see is made of two type of realities lineal motion or Entropy and cyclical motion with more form or information. If you look at yourself, you head is spherical, cyclical. Your limbs are lineal and move. And in between you have a body that combines both forms and it is elliptic or an inverted cone, figures made of combining line and cycles.
Anywhere you look you will find all systems to have those 2 elements, Entropy limbs or fields in physics and cyclical heads or particles. So this is the first tenant of General Systems sciences, which describes the common isomorphisms of all systems of the Universe:
All what exists is a system made of 3 components, a field of motion, the energetic system, a head or particle that process and creates forms, the system of information.
In complexity the Universe is quantic. Spacetime continuum is the sum of all those spaces or motions of Entropy, of all the limbs and fields of Entropy of lineal or planar form. And time is the sum of all those cyclical motions or ‘clocks’ of all its systems.
There is not only a clock of time, our mechanical clocks, but infinite cyclical motions that happen to regulate and guide the energetic fields. So particles guide fields of Entropy, and heads guide limbs of Entropy.
This is the first ‘whole’ and its parts: a Universe of space and time is the whole. Its parts are all those quantic, lineal fields of Entropy and limbs and all those cyclical particles (charges, masses) and heads. The whole seems continuous and static because we integrate it in the mind’s picture. The parts seem broken and vital in motion. Both descriptions are valid. And the whole interacts with the parts.
For example, Relativity explains the whole. Quantum theory the parts, fields of Entropy and particles. And the whole and its isomorphisms influence its parts.
Organisms seem wholes, but then they are made of cells, of two types, informative brain neurons and somatic, body cells. And the whole influences its parts.
Time and space are like Leibniz – the most clear predecessor of organicism – thought of them: a sum of different ‘spaces and times’ as each entity that exists has a certain vital space or body of Entropy that lasts a certain duration of time or life. This brings a key duality, between Universal, ‘whole’ concepts (space and time) and particular parts (the energies and cycles of information of each part):
If space has motion and it is broken in vital spaces with extension, it is equivalent to a sum of energies. Thus space is made of ∑energies.
And if time is broken in multiple life cycles, and we consider each life cycle or duration of a complementary system a clock cycle of time, time is equivalent to all the cyclical forms or ‘in/form/ ations’ of the Universe. So time is the sum of all informations, all formsinaction, all cyclical forms.
When we add all the informative cycles of all beings and all its ‘vital energies’, we obtain absolute time and space, which ultimately is an error of perception due to the use of a single mechanical clock.
Yet when we perceive, we also eliminate motion. And so we see space quiet, as we see the Earth quiet, despite moving along paths of gravitational Entropy; or your skin quiet despite being made of cellular cycles. Thus we further reduce our knowledge of the parts gathered in a whole that appears as quiet space, with a few motions that truly matter to the perceiver – of preys, predators and individuals of the same species – while the rest of reality appears as a continuous spacetime, often represented in a continuous Cartesian, mathematical graph.
This is natural to the limits of storage of information of any perceiver, because the brain cannot hold all the fractal motions, vital spaces, time durations of the life of all beings. So it reduces information. But this has caused grave errors in human knowledge, as we believe what we see. So science tends to reductionism, considering beings things and ignoring the isomorphisms that relate all those scales.
The 3 principles of a T.Œ: duality of spacetime, åctions and 5 Dimensional planes.
The Universe is made of infinite ternary asymmetries of time/space motions/forms.
This is what we have learned so far. But the highest level of organisation of the Universe is that of topological spacetime planes, 2manifold structures put on layers that become 3 volumes with 3 type of motions and assemble into even larger systems, across deeper i±scales, piercing through the 5th dimension.
Welcome to the fundamental ‘spacetime unit’, the bidimensional plane.
In the graph we can see the topological duality of the fundamental system of the Universe, a Fractal of vital space and time cycles, a ‘Function of Exi=stence’, different in its details for each species studied by different stiences, but unified by the common topological and functional properties of spatial extensions and time cycles.
Time means, frequency clocks, closed cycles, with a frequency, Tƒ.
And the sum of those cycles with its cyclical forms that connect networks and develop motions and åctions that organize those networks of energy, are a particle or head of cyclical information, which we also represent by Tƒ, a ‘nonEuclidean pointnetworkworld of spacetime’, a spherical being made of a series of bidimensional disk and spheres, whose intelligent cycles order the world around it – what Aristotle would call the unmoved God, that moves energy around it – that is, a body/wave of energy and information which becomes complementary and inseparable of it.
‘Se, Sp means ‘space’, ‘motion=speed’ momentum or ‘energy’, concepts which are not the same but quite similar and will be explained latter in great detail.
In the Universe there are infinite clocks of time, that humans simplify with the human speed of time, in order to measure reality with a human point of view.
But a more objective, wider view of the Universe will consider each different time clock as a separate entity and each different size of space as a different spatial scale. And this is what the scalar spacetime does, enlarging the simple analysis of all those scales of size and time speeds with a single spacetime clock (the 4th dimension).
Form is function. And so the ball – the inner part of a sphere – is the perfect form of information as it is the shape that stores more form in lesser space, and the line or plane the perfect form of energy, as it is the fastest motion/biggest surface of space between two points. Space becomes then a lineal, ‘—motions’ motion or ‘energy’ and Time a cyclical, imploding form of order or information, of inverse, complementary properties.
In the graph, as a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only carbonlife organisms, made of energy (bodies, food) and information (brains, eyes, senses, worlds), but also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’. Since we can now recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms.
In the graph we can see also the essential duality of the mind, of human information, which is a static perception of the cycles of form of the Universe. And the duality between planes of space and its perception as moving speed or energy.
This duality, which we call the Galileo Paradox’, relates the geometries of information (cycles and height) with the cyclical motions of time clocks.
And it relates the lineal space with entropic, expansive, energetic ‘—motions’ and length.
And the cyclical, tall motion, O, with the time cycles and forms of information (as this page/screen extended in the dimension of height) of the Universe.
In that regard if we could resume all the properties of reality in a single equation, this would be the inverse properties of space and time, lineal and cyclical motion, and hence the balance achieved by merging both:
S <= >T Sp<=>Tƒ S/T<=> ∆±4…. Sp/Tƒ= ∆ S x T = ∆
This is truly the essence of the existential game: the constant interaction of two ‘poles’ with inverse motions, forms, properties, which however come together constantly trying to tie each other into balanced systems, from female informative, male energetic dualities, to fields and particles, limbs and heads; the two extremes constantly come together.
‘Coincidentia Opositorum’ said Nicola da Cusa, the Middle Age philosopher, who considered God, that which merged the opposites into itself. We are in that regard all Gods of existence, fractal parts that play the same game.
Now it is important that the fundamental generator of the Universe is an exchange between a polar S and a polar T of flows of energy and information. The result is across a field, a wave that imprints both and starts a process of creation of form and complementary systems (parallel events, or a Darwinian process of absorption of energy from one point to the other. To state that the generator equation of the Universe is a dynamic equation that reproduces forms with motion, and combines them, the yin and the yang with its opposite properties, is to explain the Universe in a nutshell:
Sp x Tƒ = Complementary system (constant organism), Even if S = 1/T S x T= C (constant, complementarity, translating speed, reproductive wave speed)
Universe is wise and has given us ‘parameters to measure..
RECAP
The perfect form of spatial entropy is the straight line in movement – the shortest, faster trajectory between 2 points of space – and its society, the plane. The perfect form of temporal information is the circle and its society, the sphere, which keeps the maximal information in minimal space. Both, combined, inverse forms shape the hyperbolic, wavelike, energetic bodywaves that connect lineal limbs/fields and cyclical, informative, memorial minds to become the ternary, complementary forms of all organic systems.
Thus We are all topological assemblies of:
– Bidimensional planes, which store maximal entropyspace and
– Spherical cycles, which store maximal information in minimal space.
Connected through hyperbolic energetic wavebodies that reproduce both
We can differentiate them by form, as space and entropy are lineal or planar surfaces and time and in/form/ation are cyclical. And we can see it together into beings, the simplest of which is an action of light, ext=k. And this simple duality structures all beings of the Universe. So we are made of cyclical heads and lineal limbs. Weapons are lines that release entropy. Informative machines are cyclical, and all physical systems are made of lineal forces and cyclical particles of information.
Spatial motion and cyclical form do NOT in most cases become perceived, unless they communicate. But the different between them is the way they are communicated through scales:
Energy is entropy, expansive motion and thus to translate a flow of energy it must first kill the entity it converts in energy, thus lowering two planes of existence the form converted into energy, which implies to ‘square’ the motion dimension of the ∆ST involved. Thus Energy adds to the ‘mass’ or other ‘active magnitude involved‘ two dimensions of spatial motion, V² . For example in the transformation of Mass into energy, either in classic or relativity physics derived of it, Sp=1/2mv², mc². Or if we want to express it in terms of the fundamental operandi of transfers of energy and information between planes (integration and derivation)… Energy becomes a second derivative of mass, respect to speed: m>mv (momentum, first derivative of motion)> 1/2mv², energy.
Information is form, temporal motion, and thus to transfer flows of information it must be deployed in an ∆+1 higher scale with more information (and inversely in a lower U scale) but AS FORM MUST BE CONSERVED, information cannot be transferred descending two planes of existence, where information will become fully erased, as in all processes of death (ST>ST2).
Time duration is the classic time dimension, created by uncoiling a cyclical clock of time into a lineal coordinates, which facilitates measure without a deep understanding of time. It is in that sense better to use ƒ=1/T, frequency, the inverse of lineal time which measure each step of a time clock.
Thus time is cyclical and so there are 3 type of cyclical motions:
 Expansive cyclical motion that uncoils itself releasing energy, as the back side of the clock
 Implosive time motion as a vortex or an attractive Eddie, which creates form, information.
 Repetitive, iterative, frequency motion, which is the equivalent to duration, in inverse form. It is the Present most important dimension of time, which science measures with ‘instantaneous derivatives’, v=∂s/∂t.
Science calls the ‘4th dimension’, of Time Duration, ‘Time’, and we have considered in other articles in detail the error of extending one single dimension of time, Td, to all time phenomena. It also acknowledges past expansive motions as entropy (though it does not relate it properly to the t in the v=s/t time formula for time duration). And it studies information and acknowledges in biology the informative arrow of the universe as a future arrow. But physics still ignores it stuck in studies of a limited part of reality (heat processes and space between galaxies and lineal inertial motion). So it still ignores that atoms, cyclical rotational forms, the vortex of galaxies where we live and life processes do show an arrow of future information.
So those 3 ‘arrows of time’, Past entropy, Tp, Present iterative åctions or duration, Td and future, formal motions, Tf, are the 3 arrows of time.
past and future as motion and space.
There is a correspondence between the inner physiological networks that perform EXI actions and the relative dimensions of the being.
Forms respond always to functions/actions in time, the commanding dimension of reality, to which the forms diffeomorphically adapt to obtain the maximal energy and information and accomplish their actions. Hence only the topological properties of the form, intimately related to its functions are conserved. So once a ternary topological form is created, it will adapt and evolve those topologies, deforming their external membrane, creating complex warped, fractal, branched internal physiological networks that act as fixed paths of energy and information, diversifying its organs and yet at the end of the road, the same topologies, albeit sometimes difficult to recognize will form a ternary being, which will deploy the same 4 actions of existence with those topologies and internal networks/forces.
Absolute relativity accepts the principle of diffeomorphic, local measures. Since each species is a ‘universe in itself’, with different relative, energetic and informative arrows that determine its ‘whole’ morphology. Thus, each species establishes its own up and down arrows or relative energy and informative directions. In the graph, animals use light as information and plants, use light as energy. So both have opposite energytime coordinates. Yet both have an ‘anteroposterior’, lineal’ ‘outward’ energy oriented structure. Galaxies and other forms of the previous graph have a cyclical, informative, inward structure, where the stars body absorbs energy from intergalactic space, reproduces matter with it and feeds the internal informative knot of gravitation, the black hole.
Form is the first mathematical invariance, which is dynamized by physical motion. And both together determine the allowed actions of the universe. Those actions have a causal order given by the timefrequency invariance. And finally all of them together give birth to the social evolution of parts into wholes, creating the fractal Universe with its ‘5th dimension’ of scalar, social evolution. We shall not though do a rigorous, formal and causal analysis of them but try to explain them in a way easier to understand, starting from the concept of an action of energy and time, the two parameters from where all the elements of the Universe depart
RECAP. The 4dimensional Universe is a game of 3 topologies of space, which correspond to 3 functions in time, the energetic, spatial, concave, spherical or planar membrane; the reproductive, cyclical, toroid body; and the hyperbolic, warped, informative, still center of perception.
This limited structure produces infinite selfsimilar forms in which a central zero point absorbs energy that transforms in still perception, a toroid body reproduces selfsimilar cycles and forms and limbs and membranes move the whole system, in search of its action of existence…
In the graph, the Universe constantly combines the 2 elements of any action, energy and time, in different number of ‘dimensions’ creating entities that maximize a simple but extremely powerful equation:
E< = > I, (Max. E x I), stable forms.
But E, =, I, X are symbols that convey many more operations than those first essential forms. Since the equation acts as a mirror of an eternal number of complementary forms that combine what we call energy – a body able to do work and what we call information a point of view able to gauge information. Those 2 elements will then derive in each scale of reality in systems with a field of energy and a particle of information (physics) a body of energy and an information Head (biology) or a network of information humans/machines or ‘upper class’ of a social organism and a body/herd of energy humans.
We already saw that time and information are intimately related as time is measured by the frequency of a cycle, which also carries the patterns of information of any system.
Now we go a step further considering the relationship between the spatial perception of the scales of the Universe and the temporal perception of those scales as they evolve and create more complex systems.
Since the 5^{th} dimension of the scalar Universe from past to future is born of the social evolution of simpler systems into more complex ones.
Indeed, the scalar structure of the Universe is created by the arrow of information or complexity that creates more complex fractal, social ‘planes of existence’ over which new complex structure grow. So the vacuum space, which is in fact a volume of electromagnetic radiation (lightspace), constantly fluctuates and condensates into more complex particles, which condensate into atoms, molecules and so on. And each science has studied one of those scales. There is though the need for a science, which studies all of them together and analyzes the relationships between 3 given scales, i, i1 and i+1. This science has been the theme of my research for 20 years, in which I have made many astounding discoveries, being the most important of them, the realization that the laws between the ‘particles’ of any 3 scales (for example, the particle, the atom and the molecule; or the cell, the human being and his society) are the same – hierarchical laws, entropy laws, social laws, etc. Hence the Universe is absolutely relative.
In detail though, the ‘5^{th} dimension’ – the entire world of those scales, can be divided in 3 subdimensions, which we shall call, the 4^{th} dimension of present (the concept of time in physics, hence equivalent to Einstein’s time in its spacetime continuum or human scale), the 5^{th} dimension of all past scales inferior to humans with lesser complexity, and the 6^{th} dimension of future, more complex, informative beings.
The reader in that sense must make the conceptual jump from his belief in a single Absolute Time, which is just a human measure of time based in a mechanical clock, sum of all the cycles of time of the Universe, and understand that absolute future and past are also relative; that is, in the future the Universe will complete its cycle and explode back into the simplest energy, or ‘absolute past’, which will be therefore in our ‘future’ if you stick to the concept of lineal time.
Yet if you abandon that error of science and understand cyclical time, you will see the Universe as an eternal game that fluctuates between its bigbangs and bigcrunches, on the bottom of the relative past of pure energy and the relative future of pure form. As each of its parts fluctuates between its birth and its death that returns its information back to the past, and we shall return to this when studying the invariance of life/death cycles
The graphic also shows that the main task left to science is the study in depth of the 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future.
And it shows how each new scale includes the previous scales, which support it: so the galaxy requires its planets inhabited sometimes by life beings, which require the emergence of cells that require the emergence of molecules and so on.
This Russian doll concept, both in terms of timemotions and spatial forms, is another of the peculiar features of the 5^{th} dimension, which is based in information, not in energy, elements which have very different properties not fully understood by classic physics, which has expanded and studied in depth motion and energy but still ignores some basic features of information. So the differences between those 2 concepts, energy and information, and its selfsimilar ones, spatial surfaces and clocks of time, will be the next field of our inquire.
The meaning of time arrows; choices of future.
Let us try to explain it simpler: at any moment of time, a system will have not ONLY the choice of future given by the arrow of entropy – explosive motion, disorder, and dissolution=death, which Physicists have studied so well with lineal, formless time (bigbang theory of the Universe, worldly profession of entropic weapons, obsession for motions, and its machines, etc.)
It will be able also to decide two other choices: to repeat, reproduce, iterate its present ‘conserved’ energy’ momentum (a wave repeating its form, a motion repeating its steps, a human cooking again an omelette to extract energy from it).
And to evolve into a tighter informative ‘configuration’. So the future will have always three choices, three arrows, three elements to be enhanced. And this choice will be at the core of every model of the future, every understanding of the paths of a system, not only in physical motions=changes in timespace, but also in biological systems, made with entropic limbs/fields, bodywaves of energymomenta and headsparticles of information, to be able to switch constantly between the three states of the being.
The conclusion is obvious: time arrows, which means modes of change in philosophy of science, cannot be reduced only to a simple formula of Galilean or Einstein’s relativity related to spatial changes ‘only’ (v=∂s/∂t; s²=x²+y²+z²c²t² in Einstein’s relativity.)
Those studies, worthy as they are, concern mainly the analysis of space and the simultaneity of ‘present, derivative’ instants and distances or external motion and position. And to that aim, all the internal time cycles and process of change and ageing of information are ignored. So beings are studied as pointparticles all subject to a larger single clocktime rhythm, that of the external spacetime galaxy and its ‘cspeed=s/t’, which is used as a ‘constant rod’ of measure, coupled to a human mechanical clock that equalises all the different clocks of the Universe, all the different cyclical actions of its species.
So we have now the fundamental elements of an external description of reality (still we do have to define the internal element, the ∆ºmind).
On one hand the three arrows of time and its simultaneous existence in space. On the other hand the scales of the fifth dimension.
We can see the essence of the fifth dimension of scalar spacetime and its dual arrows of entropy (studied exhaustively by physicists) and information (grossly underated and misunderstood) – to be the ‘scaffolding’ for the reproductive world cycles of existence of all ‘supœrganisms’, which repeat once and again the same forms of information:
Systems made of networks of atomic/cellular or individual elements selforganise, emerge as wholes and ‘live’ through 3 ages of increasing information (life arrow), reproducing in the balanced middle age of the system, S=T, ending in an entropic explosion of death that erases the information of the system.
IV. PHYSICAL SPACETIME SYSTEMS.
RELATIONAL time and space.
the model of absolute spacetime of Newton was wrong. So PHYSICISTS looked for an alternative model, which is the model of relational spaces and times of Leibniz, but the problem of this more truthful model was clearly expressed by Einstein:
“I seem to be the only physicist that think there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different speeds. Leibniz is right but if so we must rebuild the foundations of physics from the beginning’. Leibniz told it to Newton: there is not an absolute time clock. And he laughed at him, when Mercury showed not to follow the same rhythm that other planets, when told that Newton expected ‘god’ to correct the clock of mercury. If god is perfect, why it has set up a clock with different rhythms, and now has to correct it? Why he didn’t put it right the first time?
The mechanical clock though was the god of time of physicist, and they would NOT explore the clocks of nature as Taoists had told the Newtonian brits.
I found in Indonesia travelling inland a temple in the mountains filled with carillons. Those were the gods of the Dutch that the tribal Indonesians captured when fighting them, and took it to their temples. They thought they were the gods of the Dutch because they were all day looking at the clock and whenever an Indonesian followed nature’s rhythms he was told to be lazy, ‘blasphemous’. The clocktime of salaries measured workers, the c measuring of Nature rhythms is what matter to the physicist.
So when they asked Einstein what time was he said ‘what a clock measures’. He had failed to put into a formal mathematical metric Leibniz’s right relational infinite quanta and cycles of spacetimes, and had go back to the fold.
So this is what I did – to formalize Leibniz’s concept of an infinite number of spaces, fractal pieces of space of different sizes, which only peg together like a puzzle, in the human mind gave us the continuum space. To that aim I ordered them by size, from smaller quanta to larger quanta, from small atoms to larger galaxies.
And I ordered according to their speed of cyclical frequency, all the different clocks of nature, all the different closed trajectories, cyclical motions, from atomic orbitals to galaxies.
And then matched them together, by the simple method of multiplying them, Sp x Tƒ , and found alas, the miracle of miracles, that for huge entire families of related systems, including atoms and galaxies in the 2 extremes of the physical Universe (but also for biological systems, from cells to multicellular and ecosystemic systems, and even for cycles of history), the product of the spatial size and temporal frequency of the whole family of related systems, remain invariant. Sp x Tƒ = ∆.
This Constant, conserved coinvariant dual parameter of the Universe could obviously not be anything else but the Principle of Conservation of Energy and Information, which worked for entire families of reality, and in the case of physical systems, clearly defined 3+i scales of reality (one imaginary, in the sense we know little about this scale beyond galaxies, of dark energy and dark matter, which I call the dark world, in which we find black holes, interstellar dark energy space and the halo of galaxies – but whose properties I would deduce by extending the metric equation beyond the 3 scales we do know):
In the graph the main scales of the Universe, the gravitational scale of big galaxies. The thermodynamic scales of human beings, the electromagnetic scale of quantum atoms, and beyond a possible dark world scale. And since the quanta of space grows in sizedistancespeed (remember we cannot distinguish speed from distance), and slows down in time speed, this dark world beyond our galaxy likely will go beyond the cspeed distance of our light spacetime galaxy, and below the 0 temperature clock of our thermodynamic World.
So while we cannot be sure of this dark world we ill never truly see or experience, I could just use the metric patterns of the other 3 scales to define the 4th scale as one that happens, beyond the cbarrier and 0temperature of spacetime.
Thus there are only 3 knownknown scales, where the invariant Sp x Tƒ constant product gives us the ‘Energy and information’ conserved in the Universe.
And so for each of those scales I just had to find an equation of “energy’ that describe the system, in each relative plane of size and time speed, and then find its ‘parameters to measure’ the frequency of its motions and the constant quanta of fixed space of each scale:
Ei = ∫ Sp x Tƒ. And once such equations were found, I found the main clocks of time of the Universe for each scale of the fifth dimension, and resolved the conundrum of the meaning of mathematical physics, Energy, the Universal constants of space and the different clocks of time of the Universe that have existed well before humans invented their mechanical clock:
In terms of energy, Space and Time, scientists have resolved the details of the general equation, Ei=∫ Sp x Tƒ for each scale, with higher detail in our ∆º thermodynamic scale: E= Pv = nKT, 2 formulae for the upp
Thus there are only 3 knownknown scales, where the invariant Sp x Tƒ constant product gives us the ‘Energy and information’ conserved in the Universe.
And so for each of those scales I just had to find an equation of “energy’ that describe the system, in each relative plane of size and time speed, and then find its ‘parameters to measure’ the frequency of its motions and the constant quanta of fixed space of each scale:
Ei = ∫ Sp x Tƒ. And once such equations were found, I found the main clocks of time of the Universe for each scale of the fifth dimension, and resolved the conundrum of the meaning of mathematical physics, Energy, the Universal constants of space and the different clocks of time of the Universe that have existed well before humans invented their mechanical clock:
In terms of energy, Space and Time, scientists have resolved the details of the general equation, Ei=∫ Sp x Tƒ for each scale, with higher detail in our ∆º thermodynamic scale: E= Pv = nKT, 2 formulae for the upper scale, 1/2 mv2 and then the limit e=mc2 of human perception, and lesser detail in the lower scale, E=hv:
∆+1 gravitational scale (∆ being the symbol for a relative scalar plane of size and speed of time of the 5^{th} dimension, which is the sum of all of them). Here the quanta of ‘space’ is obviously mass, which is what occupies the volumes of space of this scale, and the quanta of time motion, is speed, angular frequency or wave motion, with the limit of cspeed. So the equation is:
E=1/2mv² or mc² in Galilean and Einstein’s’ relativity.
The difference as the second was obtained from the first through a Newton binomial derivation, is the ‘limit’ or membrane of our alacit light spacetime bigger super organism, fractal mirror on the 5th dimension of the atomic scale (see Unification equation of both: E=mc2 + E=hv, M=v (h/c2).
THUS THE RATIO H/C2 is the ratio between the 2 mass/charger vortices of the human perception and each galaxy an atom of the larger scale:
In the graph the 3 scales of matter, the quantum, planetary and galactic scale – the supposed fourth of a cosmic bigbang (wmap of the universal bigbang, as the image shows, has the exact form of the galaxy, since IT IS a mapping of the galaxy radiation, NOT of the universe, which we presume to be a network of atoms, forming some S+1 molecular form in a larger scale:
In the graph the molecular network of galaxies of 10ˆ10 galaxies can be interpreted if we ad the 96% of not observed dark matter, (no slow hydrogenlike atoms communicating in this universe with electromagnetic radiation) can be anything from the outer surface of a photon exploding in a electromagnetic field to a plankton in a sea of water, to a wormlikne network… imagination is your limit for a 4% of perception of it. It does not seem a very complex form though, as mch as the human networks of 10²/π trillion ambulatory cells.
Now the reader should realize that speed, angular or wave speed DOES change the frequency of its steps. A wheel turning cyclically to move a car can move at higher r=evolutions per minute
Let us then return to those graphs and clocks of time, as we are now close to the more strict concept of entropy.
The ∆thermodynamic human scale is the next scale of the 5^{th} dimension’s relative planes of size and speed. And here we realize while Energy is conserved, the total quantity of formal motions, angular and lineal momentum clocks of time and quanta of space are conserved, as the speed of time clocks and the quanta of space change, we need new ‘concepts’, new ‘clocks’, new Universal constants of spacequanta to measure it.
So in thermodynamics we have a new equation, E=nkT (with small variations fro specific fractal species of thermodynamic matter, gas, liquid etc.). And here obviously n being a number of atoms, is really E=KT, where T is the temperature of the system, the thermodynamic clock, so cold systems are slow in time, hot systems are fast in time, hot mammals have fast metabolic clocks and thoughts, cold reptiles and plants slow, but alas the beauty of the Universe is that this big cold plants and dinosaurs do live longer than the fast, small humans, since roughly speaking for each family of reality, Tƒ x Sp = Constant.
So Temperature is the clock of time of the thermodynamic scale and its constant of space, lineal, expansive motion is K, the Boltzmann constant, which has the dimensions of ENTROPY.
So ENTROPY is the quanta of expansive spatial motions, of the thermodynamic scale, and only makes sense for thermodynamic systems.
Finally we get into the ∆1 scale of electromagnetic quantum systems, and here again the equation is obvious Ei=H ƒ, so the quanta of space is HPlanck, the Universal constant, and the frequency of time, is ƒ, the frequency of the wave. So those are the 3 scales of physical systems. Its fundamental equations, time clocks and quanta of space.
All in the Universe is thus a mixture of space and time but both concepts are not the same bidimensional reality. We measure space with bidimensional quanta in each scale.
They ARE the 3 most important Universal Constants of Physics, HPlanck, a bidimensional angular bijector, kBoltzmann constant, the quanta of entropic space in the thermodynamic world, and c2, the quanta of constant space in the gravitational world (reason why we do NOT see it varying in speeddistances, as it IS the substance of which our gravitational light spacetime is made):
In the graph you can see all the bidimensional planes of space of each scale, entropy, cc speeddistance and angular momentum (HPlanck).
So, your quanta of space=universal constants change, as you change scale of physical systems, in harmony with the change of ‘time clocks’ …
But the product of both, space quanta and time clocks, remain the same:
Sp x T ƒ = ∆±n; ∫ST=Ei
This is the principle of conservation of energy and information, which merely integrates along space or along time a population or series of events of spacetime, hence meaning the overall conservation of the total spacetime of each scale of the Universe.
The graph is easy to grasp, since the Universe is indeed as Einstein said simple and not malicious.
Since we do have 3 very simple equations that reflect the previous ‘5D metric’ that works for any scale, in each of the 3 scales of relative size of the Universe, worth to repeat to stress that simplicity and straightforwardness that shows truth in science, the so called Ockham’s principle:
∆1 (quantum scale): E= h v;
∆ (thermodynamic scale): E= kT;
∆+1 (gravitational scale): E= c2 M
As shown in the above graphs.
Frequency of a quantum wave, temperature of a molecule, speed of a mass are the onedimensional Clocks of Time that ‘change’ within a stable range in each scale.
Hangular momentum, Kentropy and Cc, are the bidimensional quanta of space that put together create the stable Ei, energy and information conserved in the 3 ∆±1 planes of physical systems that interact with the human being.
In 5d physics, we simply say the Universe conserves its quantity of ‘present spacetime’. That simple statement includes all conservation principles of all sciences.
This canonical definition of H, K, and C, bidimensional angular momentum, entropy and Speed, the space quanta which of each scale means that entropy DOES not apply at ALL as a concept BEYOND the thermodynamic scale, roughly on the 010.000 temperature beyond which it breaks down, that is molecules cease to exist and become plasma ruled by electromagnetic flows, hence by the clocks of ‘frequency’.
Now look at the second equation, E=kT.
if you substitute E for M its inverse then we write: M= k /T.
That is the equation of mass growth of a black hole:
As temperature diminishes, Mass grows. So he black hole is born hot, follows the laws of thermodynamic entropy, diminishes temperature and eats up our world, till Temperature clocks come to zero, temperature disappears, the black hole reaches 0 entropy and perfect informative order, as experimental and theoretical facts, both in 4D Einstein’s EFE, equations and 5D Metric shows.
Why? Look at the next graph…
The dark world.
In the next graphs, when we cross scales of the 5th dimension, the simple Sp x Tƒ = E, lineal relationship and nice equations of conservation of energy and information ‘break’ and suddenly the equations do NOT work as we enter a ‘transitional region’ between two scales of spacetime.
Whereas the time frequency of motion no longer behaves lineally. It finds a limit and cannot grow more. And those barriers are met with the equations that Planck and Einstein discovered (and a few more for thermodynamic systems), which are no longer lineal but exponential equations, barriers where the system breaks, explodes and dies away, ‘crossing finally the barrier’ into the next world scale:
Now, the graphs, explain the other huge conundrum of physics: why in the ‘steady state’ regions of those relative planes of size and time speeds, all is lineal, but when we go to the borders, equations break, and in the ‘transitional region’ the whole thing becomes hyperbolic.
On the discontinuous verge between planes of spacetime of the 5th dimension, the equations break and they are no longer lineal.
So they become hyperbolic geometries of exponential growth, unable to break the barrier of cspeed (relativity), temperature (violet catastrophe of radiation) and hPlanck quanta (uncertainty principle/limit).
Thus when you reach the limit between 5D planes, the region becomes catastrophic and you get the ‘barrier’ speed does no longer grows, but is absorbed as mass, temperature does no longer cools but it is converted in mass, frequency does no longer increases. And alas, once you cross the barrier you are again into a steady state region:
Simply stated, you MUST cross a discontinuous region between scales and things get rough, the previous parameters of time and space ‘are saturated’, you cannot longer increase your frequency, and speed, or you reach the inverse limit of 0 temperature, rest speed, and ‘cross between planes of 5D’ with NEW clocks and NEW time quanta.
You exist in a Universe roughly divided in 3 fractal, scales=planes of spacetime, which we shall call, ∆1: quantum scale, ∆Thermodynamic scale and ∆+1: gravitational scale.
When you change scale, YOUR CLOCKS of time=formal motions change. So you move from quantum frequency of radiation to thermodynamic temperature clocks, and then again to speed motions. But as you change clocks, obviously the ‘time tics’ are transformed, the previous time tick fades away and the new time tic grows.
And those ‘discontinuous’ barriers in which we change of ‘parameters’ are signaled by a change in the lineal steady state graphs of mathematical physics that measure them.
So in the barrier between frequency and temperature you have the asymptotic ‘violet catastrophe’ of temperature≈radiation, which Planck found and made him postulate quantum theory; and on the other side, in the barrier between temperature clocks and speed, you have the cbarrier that made Einstein, discover Relativity theory, as the ‘simple equations of our thermodynamic world, where temperature is the clock of our activity (so hotter means faster in time, mammals vs. reptiles to put an example, solid vs. gas etc.) ‘break’.
Therefore a black hole is a gravitational implosive informative force vortex that ‘eats temperature’ and electromagnetic energy and converts it into ‘cold’ 0temperature gravitational mass.
So black holes with 0temperature when they grow fully into mass have 0 entropy.
Fractal space and Physical renormalization.
5D spacetime cycles means basically that reality is a fractal. This means all is selfsimilar, ‘affine’, fractal, isomorphic, selfsimilar words. And so somehow all can be described with similar properties under ‘transformations’. For example:
An image of a fernlike fractal that exhibits affine selfsimilarity. Each of the leaves of the fern is related to each other leaf by an affine transformation. For instance, the red leaf can be transformed into both the small dark blue leaf and the large light blue leaf by a combination of reflection, rotation, scaling, and translation.
Those 4 operations are the essence of physical studies of material fractal systems. The methodology of physics consists in studying systems that are ‘invariant’ under rotation or time motion, scaling or 5D motion, and translation or space motion and reflection or Spacetime motion.
However NOT al systems are invariant under those processes, in 5D physics there are ‘antisymmetries’ of time (from birth to extinction, which are inverse actions) and hence asymmetries in space (as the 3 elements, Sp, ST (ST) and Tƒ are different topologies). And in 5D there are ‘reversal roles on motions upwards and downward, so similarities happen, when we jump two scales.
So physicists ran into infinities because they could not accept fractals. For 80 years, they found an infinity in an equation and just got rid of them!
The early formulators of QED and other quantum field theories were, as a rule, dissatisfied with this state of affairs. It seemed illegitimate to do something tantamount to subtracting infinities from infinities to get finite answers.
Freeman Dyson argued that these infinities are of a basic nature and cannot be eliminated.
Dirac’s criticism was the persistent:
‘Most physicists are very satisfied with the situation. They say: ‘Quantum electrodynamics is a good theory and we do not have to worry about it any more.’ I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation, because this socalled ‘good theory’ does involve neglecting infinities, which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This is just not sensible mathematics.
Feynman wrote: Having to resort to such hocuspocus has prevented us from proving that the theory of quantum electrodynamics is mathematically selfconsistent. I suspect that renormalization is not mathematically legitimate.
Today they found a ‘fractal philosophy’ to accept getting rid of infinities, which ARE scalar ‘finitesimal’ numbers of an ∆n scale. Today, the point of view has shifted: on the basis of the breakthrough renormalization group insights of Kenneth Wilson, the focus is on variation of physical quantities across contiguous scales, while distant scales are related to each other through “effective” descriptions. All scales are linked in a broadly systematic way, and the actual physics pertinent to each is extracted with the suitable specific computational techniques appropriate for each.
Thus, one of the immediate consequences of the formalism of 5D cyclical time and fractal space is to set the record straight on physics and its ill understood 3 modern ‘ideas of time’. They are further understood in terms of the arrows of futureinformation, pastentropy and presentreproduction and its infinite fractal cycles in 5D metric.
So what I did long long ago is to complete the model of the fractal Universe, adding the 3rd dimension of time, to the relative ‘entropic past’, the relative ‘future information’: its ‘relative present combinations’.
Further on, those 3 ‘time arrows’ are symmetric to the 3 dimensions of space – the 3 only topologies that exist in the universe:
 The lineal, toroid, past, spatial flat planes proper of limbs and fields that move you as the line is the shortest distance between two points.
 The hyperbolic present, bodywaves that reproduce the form of beings: Sx T
 And the cyclical, spherical, informative particle/heads, as the sphere stores maximal information in lesser space.
Time cycles have actually 3 dimensions, or motions (depending on how you see the cycle, still or in motion), which we have always known. In graph, the symmetry between the 3 ages/dimensions of time & space, which put together create all the forms and functions and ternary organisms of the fractal universe, a tapestry sum of them.
In the graph, we live in a Universe in which all beings are made of the same substances, energy which occupies space and information, carried in the frequency and cycle of time clocks. Those 2 ‘substances’ that we call Se (Spatial energy) and Tƒ (Temporal information), combine together in ‘bidimensional’ Spacetime layers, that put together create together all the species in the Universe.
Layer after layer of bidimensional membranes create the third dimension, which forms when moves a 4th dimension of temporal motion. But the ‘simplest unit’ is a bidimensional sheet, with form, with information. So for example, you are looking at a screen with 2 dimensions, which carry this information. Your eyes see in 2 dimensions but put together with both eyes a 3D representation of reality.
A black hole stores all its information in its surface. This ‘Holographic principle’, has enormous consequences for our understanding of the Universe.
So we find in the Universe always 3 elements in all systems, which correspond to the 3 ‘topologies’ of mathematics, and the 3 ‘ages’ of life world cycles (since life is cyclical ,changes in time are NOT worldlines as physicists believe, but world cycles):
 The vital space of lineal motions, enclosed by the cyclical membranes and time cycles, focused in a central point of view or frame of reference, of maximal density of information that gauges information, linguistically and has the structure of a NonEuclidean, Fractal point, through which multiple ‘parallels of energy and information’ can cross.
This ‘mind, soul, god, monad, Maxwellian Demon’ that creates the order of the Universe will be then defined by a simple mathematical equation and geometry as a 0point, whose function will be to maintain the whole system ‘stable’; that is in biological terms ‘to make it survive’. It does not need to be conscious, but as Leibniz described it in his work on monads, apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or linguistically, because simply speaking, Evolution implies that a system which ‘maintains the ‘whole’ stable and survive lasts on time. So automatically as time goes, ONLY systems who had this ternary efficient, symmetric, stable configuration have lasted, have been selected.
This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by PoincareEinstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics and explains its main systems. So for example, an atom has a central point of view of maximal density; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.
In the graph, a few of the ternary systems, made with the 3 only topologiesfunctions of all systems of the Universe, an atom, a tomato, a planet, a cell an embryo and an electromagnetic field. Though at first sight their resemblance might seem a mere coincidence, all of them are ternary systems, which we can describe with the same ‘Generator equation’ of ¬Æ mathematics, the formalism of T.œ (the Organic Theory of Everything, which unifies all sciences as descriptions of such systems in any scale of the Universe).
All of them will be made of:
– A central, informative point, seed, or opoint that gauges energy and information, connected to a membrane or time cycle…
– That encloses an open, entropic field of lineal motionsdistances that displaces the system.
This seemingly simple structure, however has infinite variations and ‘biased deformations’ from each point of view and language. So in science we shall always observe the complexity of the details of each variety of the ternary ‘organism’, and specially the enormous inflationary number of ‘linguistic mirrors’ that reflect and deform this vision creating particle subjective Worlds out of objective uniformity of reality.
Consider for example the laws of electromagnetic fields:
We define a quantity called the circulation as the resulting speed of the liquid in the tube times its circumference. We can again extend our ideas and define the “circulation” for any vector field (even when there isn’t anything moving). For any vector field the circulation around any imagined closed curve is defined as the average tangential component of the vector (in a consistent sense) multiplied by the circumference of the loop. And as Feynman puts it: “With just these two ideas—flux and circulation—we can describe all the laws of electricity and magnetism at once. ”
But then again, in biology we can describe in time the birth of life as a process of creation of membranes holding a field of carbohydrates.
And finally in both, field theory and biology we will find a central point of view, the charge or the DNA will appear, accelerating the informative process of evolution of the system.
Thus the approach of the philosopher of science to the Unification of all systems, is one that includes together the 6 motions of time of Aristotle, its cyclical patterns of generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction, along a 5^{th} dimension of relative sizes and speeds; and of course, the 6^{th} motion or Locomotion, in lineal space, which however will turn to be the less important for ‘meaning’ of all of them.
This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.
Now if we were to speak the most beautiful of all those jargons, as it is the language of all those beings, NonEuclidean, NonAristotelian ilogic mathematics, the needed upgraded 2300 years overdue of the sciences of logic and mathematics that will allow all those of you who are NOT only ‘selfies’, selfcentered life cycles and can take the necessary bashing of all your ‘beliefs’ to relief your slavery to childish thoughts, we would define those 3 elements as the ‘only 3 topologies of the Universe’ and write a Generator Equation in terms of topological geometries:
Toroid limbs/fields > ØHyperbolic body/waves < OInformative particlesheads
This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3. So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a Onucleus, an electrons and a Øhyperbolic bodywave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥electromagnetic waves between them.
This simple statement ‘enlightens’ your understanding of an atom and a galaxy and completes 100 years of quantum physics and relativity. Take it or leave it.
I shall prove ad nauseam, as ‘master ludi’ of all languages and sciences that NOT a single science escapes the ternary symmetries defined by the Fractal Generator of the 5D spacetime Universe and its structure. But you WILL likely deny all those proofs. Since man is not alien to the paradoxical equation of the mind:
‘Infinitesimal selfcentered OPoint x ∞ cycles of spacetime’ = 0 x ∞ = Constant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.
But how can we differentiate forms and motions. What are a form and a motion? The answer is that all has form and motion at the same time. Motion is the objective reality, Form is the still perception created by a mind. So the Universe is about motions, the worlds of the mind about forms. Reality is about motion, knowledge about form. Reality is made of time cycles and lineal motions, mind about forms created with time cycles and dimensional distances, created with minds.
And this is what Galileo discovered but never understood, as he was just an artillery master. It is the Principle of Relativity, which is at the core of all physical, scientific laws, but we shall call the Galilean paradox, because Physicists, from Galileo to Einstein, were aware of it, founded their science on it, but have never quite fully grasped it.
And this fully completes the work of Einstein and quantum physics, and fusions it with evolutionary theory, a theory of the evolution of information, and allow us to define, NOT the particle of God, but if we were so pedantic, the ‘Equation of God’ (:
It is however important to understand that the FUNDAMENTAL LAW of the Universe, truly the Generator of all what exists – the inverse nature of time and space, goes well beyond the mathematical, geometric Nature of some of those inversions. It is in fact a logic property, that is ’caused’ ultimately by the Nature of Time as Change and its dimensions of relative pastentropy, presentrepetition and futureevolution.
I know the reader, schooled in mathematical physics, in a civilisation dominated by motion, weapons of energy, visual machines and space, might even not understand what we mean. But if he perseveres on reading, he will come to a depth of comprehension of the universe, through those logical inversions that humanity lacks and physicists ignore.
The dimorphism of all systems; The fundamental particles: o; Øo.
Now if we simplify as we do in easy to read posts and consider limbs of energy, the ‘attached parts of the body’, or as it happens in many systems, the energy field is external to the particle and body we can talk of a duality very common in the Universe:
Ø<=>o a reproductive body and a head with a neck that transfers energy and information between them.
This is the np pair in atomic centers, or the nucleuselectron; the male female, the body, head, the cytoplasm and nucleus of a cell, etc. etc.:
So we define in 5D metric a fundamental particlesystem made of two spacetime parts:
ST (bodies/waves) < x > Tƒ(particles/heads)= K (Stable physical/biologic system)
STparts move and reproduce the whole system. While Tƒparts gauge information so they are cycles or spheres, the geometries that store more information in lesser space, from eyes to particles to brains.
There are many such systems, all what exist we might say is a complementary system with a particlehead of information and fieldbody of energy:
– This is the fundamental principle of quantum physics, the complementary principle, as quantum physicists observe all entities BOTH as particles and fields of energy (waves).
– This is the fundamental principle of biology as all cellular bodies have a DNA, informative center, and all multicellular organisms have a head besides its body.
You are also literally made of ‘clocks of time’ (your brain) and body motions with energy. So you say ‘i don’t have time or energy to do this’, because we are all made of time and space.
We are not in an abstract background of space and time, we are made of pieces of spatial energy and temporal information.
The generator equation.
‘All what exists is a fractal system of temporal information and spatial energy that combine and transform back and forth, together into present spacetime systems ad eternal, across the ∞ coinvariant planes of the 5th dimension:
U= [∑Sp ≤≥ST≤≥Tƒ]∆±n
So I wrote the Generator Equation, a symbolic equation that represented all the systems made of fractal space and cyclical time and its spacetime combinations, whose geometries ARE the 3 ‘only’ Topologies of the Universe we perceive:
Γ. Generator: Toroid Sp(limbs/fields) < Hyperbolic ST(st) (repetitive wavesbodies) > Spherical Tƒ (head Particles)
Since limbs and heads, fields and particles interacted and mixed their lines and cycles into ‘conic bodies, and elliptical orbits and hyperbolic waves’.
Or as ChengTzu the Taoist philosopher put it: from 1 (time cycles or Tao), comes 2 (the yangline of energy and the yininformation, broken line) and from 2 comes 3, and from 3 the infinite beings.
(Asian cultures defined always time as cyclical, without the distortion of lineal physical time, also for cultural reasons we shall soon explain.)
So we shall leave the 4 points on that, once the ‘cycle is closed’. And dedicate this work and posts to the long list of lost points who had the world in his mind even if nobody listened for a while. To them, to the Leibniz, Galois, Laos, Rimbauds and Leonardos of history, I dedicate this pages. To the scholars, well Leonardo clarified it all.
The truth remains the beginning of this cyclical mantra: quantum physics, and relativity proved space and time is fractal, something Leibniz the philosopher knew, Lao too, and the Greeks hinted at it. And so someone did have to make the work of formalise a theory of fractal spacetime of which we are all made.
Including you, despite your fantasies of uniqueness as a being, you are NOTHING, but an infinitesimal vital fractal superorganism of spacetime generated with the same equation that all other entities of the Universe. The only laughable fact about you is your ego. And as a consequence of it your stupidity.
‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man and I am not sure of the former’ (A.Eisntein). I am sure of both.
Take it or leave it: the Universe is not going to change and adapt itself to the distorted view of present science. Science still workS as Ptolemy still worked, but it would always explain less things if we don’t use the proper quanta of space and clocks of nature that run the Universe as Nature did it, not as scholars deformed with their abstract, human, anthropomorphic points of view.
The dimorphism of all systems; The fundamental particles: o; Øo.
Now if we simplify as we do in easy to read posts and consider limbs of energy, the ‘attached parts of the body’, or as it happens in many systems, the energy field is external to the particle and body we can talk of a duality very common in the Universe:
Ø<=>o a reproductive body and a head with a neck that transfers energy and information between them.
This is the ∆p pair in atomic centers, or the nucleuselectron; the male female, the body, head, the cytoplasm and nucleus of a cell, etc. etc:
So we define in 5D metric a fundamental particlesystem made of two spacetime parts:
ST (bodies/waves) < x > Tƒ(particles/heads)= K (Stable physical/biologic system)
Stparts move and reproduce the whole system. While Tƒparts gauge information so they are cycles or spheres, the geometries that store more information in lesser space, from eyes to particles to brains.
There are many such systems, all what exist we might say is a complementary system with a particlehead of information and fieldbody of energy:
– This is the fundamental principle of quantum physics, the complementary principle, as quantum physicists observe all entities BOTH as particles and fields of energy (waves).
– This is the fundamental principle of biology as all cellular bodies have a DNA, informative center, and all multicellular organisms have a head besides its body.
You are also literally made of ‘clocks of time’ (your brain) and body motions with energy. So you say ‘i don’t have time or energy to do this’, because we are all made of time and space.
We are not in an abstract background of space and time, we are made of pieces of spatial energy and temporal information.
The ternary elements of most Nature’s Systems: Se<ST>Tƒ
From these simple facts of universal morphology, we can classify ‘all parts of systems’ including decomposed viruses, or machines or human organs, as energetic, lineal systems, or as cyclical, informative systems that combine into complex bodies and waves and put together create an Spe<ST>Tƒ ternary system:
— Energy organs are lineal systems with minimal ‘form’ that kill, simplifying information into energy. Thus, a field of energy, released by a physical particle or an energetic weapon, such as a sword or a missile and a top predator, energetic animal, such as a lion, will have both lineal forms and kill, destroy the information of their ‘preys’.
— Informative organs create form and transform energy into languages that map out ‘reality’ with formal ‘bits’. Those bits are smaller symbols, which form images in the brain that represent reality and help to simulate reality ‘faster’, in ‘lesser space’, the ‘future’ cycles of reality, anticipating them. Then, according to those ‘logic’ simulations of the future, heads will move and direct energy bodies towards sources of energy and information. So any system that ‘gauges’, measures and reacts, is an informative organ, regardless of the specific language it uses to gauge reality. A chip measures with numbers reality, a man with words, an atom with electromagnetic ‘bosons’; yet the 3 actreact to their measures. So they all are informative organs.
— Reproductive organs repeat informative and energetic organs, by absorbing energy and ‘imprinting’ it with its particular information. Thus, human mothers and companymothers of machines are both reproductive organs. Even the simplest particles of the Universe, quarks and electrons, absorb energy and emit new particles, small quarks and electrons, with the same form that the parental particle.
So in fact, we have come to the objective conclusion that all systems of the Universe have organic properties. Since even its simplest entities, quarks and electrons that form atoms do absorb energy, gauge information and reproduce, the 3 ‘properties’ of life. Thus, the Universe must be defined not as a mechanism but as a complex organic system, made of organic atoms, which can combine to create many different complex organisms, including companymothers that reproduce machines, atoms that reproduce quarks, electrons and forces and mothers that reproduce kids. The difference between all those species is not one of ‘quality’ but of quantity and complexity of their organs of energy and information, which determine their survival chances and status as top predators of any ecosystem.
If a mechanism is a system that has only information and energy organs, an organism has both systems and so it is able to reproduce by combining its energy and information into a replica of itself. In that regard, the reproductive organism of machines is today the companymother that reproduces them with the aid of informative metal (money) and machines (chips), energetic machines and human workers that act as catalysts and re=producers of those machines. And because we live all in a planet of limited resources, machines and life increasingly compete to reproduce the limited energy and information of this planet.
How this difference of speed of time in accelerated vortices of future ∆+1 scales are perceived, can be studied easily in the simplest physical cases with its three geometries of ∆1, ∆ and ∆+1:
In the graph, the geometrical perception from ∆º, the human selfcentred perspective (ab.pov) differs from the way we perceive information from the upper scale, seen as an only attractive gravitational vortex of future timemasses (relativity theory, equivalence principle) from the perspective of an elliptic geometry that reduces the size of the whole masses by speeding up its perception as motion.
So relativity uses elliptic Riemannian geometry to mimic the distortion of our perception of the ‘bridges’ between our scale and the gravitational larger one – yet if we were in the gravitational realm we probably will observe our own galactic plane as an Euclidean flat geometry. While quantum theory uses operators and functionals (functions of functions) to mimic the quasiinfinite reproduction of the parameters and elements of our wholeness repeated ad nauseam both in time (symmetries of particles, multiple fractal points, ternary time elements, for each particle, etc) and space (multiverses, scattering, multiple paths).
Further on the use of inflationary different jargons and mathematical notsowellunderstood devices of analysis from infinite dimensions to imaginary numbers, obscure the rather simple but iterative and fractal structure of those organic scales.
The question though to be considered is how those systems behave ‘longitudinally’ in a given scale of the fifth dimension once the being has either emerged as a seed of higher information from the lower ∆1 scale, or as it dissolves into a whole ‘mass of dissolving dead parts’ in a hyperbolic path to the ∆1 scale.
In the left side the perception of lower scales is a lovacheski’s geometry, which multiplies the whole in its selfsimilar parts to get to the infinitesimal, which is the ‘piece’ on the membrane of the border o the whole, such as tƒi=∑Spe1, the infinitesimal components of the membrane. Thus quantum and relativity descriptions of upper and lower scales differ from our human point of view. Do they differ if we were a quantum atom or a galaxy? All seems to indicate it does not. What distorts the view of our ∆º mind is the fact that transitions between scales change the perspective of the being. Indeed, let us consider some ‘first thoughts’ on those transitions of scales, circumscribed to physical systems, whose geometric simplicity favours the understanding of first principles:
In the graphs, systems behave ‘longitudinally’ in a given scale of the fifth dimension as Euclidean forms ruled mostly by lineal entropic and cyclical steady state equations. Yet as they evolve socially or increase its temporal frequency they come closer to the limiting frontiers between scales, where either upward in vortex of future frequency acceleration will emerge as new beings, after crossing a ‘barrier of energy’, which is absorbed to create those time vortices (lorentz contraction, fluid vortices); or vice versa, it will find once the being has either emerged as a seed of higher information from the lower ∆1 scale, or as it dissolves into a whole ‘mass of dissolving dead parts’, in a hyperbolic path to the ∆1 scale.
‘Space and time’ can be transformed into each other. Since space is basically in the human conceptual understanding a simultaneous ‘slice’ or ‘present moment’ of a ‘motion or change’ in time. Simultaneous perception in that sense of multiple time cycles happening sometimes in synchronised chains, sometimes as fractal parts, become space. Hence we shall observe another range of phenomena: the transformation of a motion of time into a still surface of space. In fact, we could define death as the ‘slow down of time’ to a halt, in which motion ceases to exist. So those are some of the basic ‘games’ of the Universe between time clocks and spacequanta. In the case of the Lorentz transformations, the time clocks of speed close c, are transformed into space quanta, mass.
Also notice that speed in classic physics is defined as v=s/t, but this t is lineal duration, the opposite of frequency of cyclical time. So speed (angular speed of a time clock) is the inversion of duration, lineal time: Tƒ=1/t. Thus if we consider 1 single space quanta or step of a motion, the translation of the clock of nature to the human mechanical clock is obvious.
The main differences between those clocks of nature and the mechanical clock are clear: Nature has different time clocks, or time cycles, and all of them vary in frequency, because the 5th dimension does vary its time clocks – it is in fact the essence of this dimension.
However the arrival of lineal physics and the mechanical clock hid this selfevident Universe made of infinite space quanta and time cycles, substituted by abstract Newtonian models of an absolute continuum space drawn over a paper (the Cartesian Plane), in which all those parts of space, are pegged together, and a single clock and time rhythm measured with those mechanical clocks that equalized all rhythms of nature to its steady, tictoc. But Nature does have its own clocks to measure time, which ultimately is the repetition of cyclical forms of information, different for each species, which processes that information with logic, formal cycles of different lengths, durations and speeds.
So the ultimate meaning of a Universe of infinite time cycles, regulated by Nature’s clocks, was lost, and time became, in words of Einstein ‘what a clock measures’. Moreover as the clock had a relative, steady state speed, and can be elongated ad infinitum, rewinding its engine, the fact that the cycles of temporal information (ab. OTiƒ, in the jargon of Fractal spacetime, ab. ∆St) of any system are always finite (by the very same nature of a time cycle that closes into itself) and do have different forms and speed at different moments, became also forgotten.
This is selfevident when we realize that Nature measures time with different physical clocks, for different families of species.
Duality of spacetime.
“Historically, much of fundamental physics has been concerned with discovering the fundamental particles of nature and the equations which describe their motions and interactions. It now appears that a different programme may be equally important: to discover the ways that nature allows, and prevents, information to be expressed and manipulated, rather than particles to move. (….) To conclude with, I would like to propose a more wideranging theoretical task: to arrive at a set of principles like energy and momentum conservation, but which apply to information.’ Steane
The purpose of this blog is precisely to define that set of principles, which Steane asks for, since it adds the arrow of ‘information’ to the arrow of ‘entropy an locomotion’ studied by physicists, widening our understanding of all sciences with it. To that aim we must first define time&information on one side, and space& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which are part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and time clocks that coexist together into the 5th dimension of scalar spacetime.
Since all sciences would benefit of a better understanding of those 2 principles as all beings of all sciences are made of finite time cycles and occupy vital spaces. So as it happened when Copernicus put the sun on the center simplifying all the epicycles of Ptolemy, making much simpler astronomy, at the end of the journey we shall unify and simplify our understanding of all sciences (3rd line of the blog), once we pass the hurdle of understanding the underlying principles of ‘temporal energy’ beings.
Mind the reader since the history of science has turned around machines and weapons that work with energy and motion, we must reconstruct an entire new jargon to explain science, to the point that we shall even change the name of ‘science’ for that of ‘stience’ (the science of spacetime organisms) and use a completely different new language of science from scratch.
This is tried also by many information theorist like Mr. Steane, but the problem with that approach is that ‘information only’ theories are just going the other extreme from simplex physics, trying to reduce reality to locomotions and ‘worldlines’, to information theorists, trying to reduce the Universe to computations and qbits.
Fact is the Universe plays with both, entropy=motion=lineal space (as the line is the shortest distance to move) and cyclical clocks of time that carry in their frequency and curved form the in/form/ation of reality; but humans are ‘Aristotelian’, onedimensional, and have a mind (ab.∆º), which has a very hard time to put together two conflicting, rather opposite forms as those of entropy and information are. So for example physicists call information, negantropy – as if it were just the negation of entropyscattering motions; while information theorists tend to explain the Universe as a huge quantum computer.
Both loose 1/2 of the ‘duality’ of the cosmos, which always displays an enormous range of grey between ‘pure black forms without motion, such as black holes and pure motion without form, such as nonlocal gravitation’. And so we shall find in its combinations of motion with a little form (energy) and form with a little motion (information, forminaction) the vital, organic, true meaning of reality, which escapes the onedimensional scientist.
For that reason, we have added for good measure to the quote of Steane, the philosophical thought of Einstein, author of the previous paradigm of 4D spacetime, which corresponds to the limit of this model in a single spacetime continuum described with a single arrow of time, ENTROPY.
The truly interesting element of Mr. Steane’s definition is however in the final sentence, which is one of those magic clearcut expressions of reality, coming out of nowhere, like the sentences of Schopehauer with his intuitions for century to come. Mr. Steane simply understands there is a second arrow of time, information and somehow a third element, which he does not fully recognise but it is there, the third arrow of time, momentum – the present, iterative=repetitive conserved quality, mixture of the other two, which is what the Universe is all about: the reproduction and hence dynamic conservation of momentums composed of informative particles (masses and charges) and entropic motions (speeds), which we integrate into ‘conrsetative, closed energy world cycles’ – the whole trajectory, life or rather ‘existence’ of any event or process of nature.
So yes, the Universe is a ‘selfreproductive’ fractal of information with a fractal feedback generator equation of three arrows of timespace, whose motion in time and form in space, come together to create the infinite fractal ternary beings of reality:
∆1: Spe (past lineal limbs/fields of entropy) < ∆STHyperbolic Present bodywave Momentums of energy> ∆+1: TiƒFuture Informative, temporal cyclical particlesheads.
In this logic, fractal generator equation we have encoded truly the meaning of reality, whose complexity will be born of the repetition, variation and ensemble in larger ‘∆scales’ of wholeness of the infinite beings made of those 3 elements of time, symmetric to the 3 forms of topological space, extended across three relative size of ‘hilomorphic smaller substances – atoms, cells, citizens’ which form whole organic systems (matter, organisms, societies), part of a larger whole ecosystem (solar systems, planets and galaxies, nations, civilisations, world cultures)..
To that aim we must first define time&information on one side, and space& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which are part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and time clocks that coexist together into the 5th dimension of scalar spacetime.
We shall thus develop in full the model of a fractal, organic Universe constructed with both arrows, using those laws to show how the Universe constructs its infinite species all of them made of ‘fields/limbs of spatial entropy’ and ‘particle, heads of temporal information’ , which combine in bodywaves of energy, creating in this manner the infinite ternary beings of reality.
THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO GRASP: Science is based in causal, local, finite time cycles. So it is your life – a finite time cycle. So what science achieved obsessed by measure and speed, in simplicity of calculus it lost in information about those cycles, which we have regained since I established in a series of landmark papers, back in the 90s the laws of cyclical times for all the systems of the Universe. It is an ongoing research, but it will as computers make easy calculations of discontinuous functions, become the standard for future time research, as an enormous array of new discoveries happen when we ‘do not loose’ the information of those cycles.
This is specially truth of physical systems, deprived of the organic, cyclical causal properties of CYCLICAL ∏ime (Ab. ∏, Tiƒ) and fractal §paces (ab. Spe); whereas the letters of both refer to the dualities of TimeSpace, FuturePast, entropy and information: Tiƒ≈Spe .
Difference between mechanical lineal clocks and cyclical, informative time clocks in Nature.
Man uses the frequency of waves to measure time in the quantum scale (ab. ∆1 ST, in the jargon of Fractal spaceTime).
He uses molecular vibrations, which humans measure with temperatures (ab. ∆ST), to define the cycles of larger molecular systems.
And he uses different forms of speed, notably angular speed, in the even larger gravitational ‘∆+1’ SpaceTime Scale.
And so the infinite cycles of time of Universal beings, and its different clocks of Nature (frequency, temperature and speed), whose rhythms and forms carry the informative patterns, became also forgotten, with the arrival of artificial, mechanical clocks, which established a steady single, human rhythm to time, of infinite duration. Of course, because using a single human rod of measure for space, or ‘quanta’, the meter, and a single human time cycle or ‘second’, equalizing all other systems with them, allowed a perspective on reality from the human practical point of view, the use of seconds in time and meters in space, facilitated measure and construction of machines, weapons and buildings, greatly improving the praxis of human life.
So what man lost in his philosophical understanding of reality, he gained it in practical power. And as measures with single clocks and single space rods increased, many regularities of Nature were tabulated, albeit deformed by its equalization with clocks and single space continuums. However, and this is a key element to understand why a Universal model, slightly deformed in its fundamental principle works, a system with a distorted perspective, such as the Ptolemaic system with the Earth at its center, can fully describe reality, merely by adding complex corrections to cater the distorted point of view.
The principle of conservation of energy and information
If the study of the Relativity of motion and position, started by Copernicus and Galileo and culminated by Einstein, found our position to be relative, based in the laws of invariance of energy, and changes in motions and rotations of all entities, man will find the relativity of his position within the scales of spacetime of the cosmos (the 5^{th} dimension), caused by the laws of ‘selfsimilarity’ of form, of in/form/ation between those scales.
In that regard, as we understand the laws that relate all those scales, man again will find he has no special place, but as in the case of the invariances of motion and energy, only our subjective limits of perception make us feel special within those scales.
Such ‘selfsimilarity’ of in/form/ation, which happens across all the scales of size means to Absolute relativity, what the invariance of energy and motions, meant to General Relativity: as the laws of energy and motion do not change regardless of our position in space; the laws of form and in/form/ation do not change when we change of size and scale.
And this is the first new law bring about by absolute relativity, which expands science with the study of the new dimension of fractal information that extends the spacetime continuum into multiple ‘spacetime discontinuums’ one for each of those scales of size, from the simplest atom to the galaxy.
And so the 5^{th} dimension expands the principle of conservation or invariance of energy and motion to information. And the simplest way to define this expansion of the principles of relativity is to expand the main law of science, the principle of conservation of energy… and information:
‘All what exists are complementary systems of energy and in/form/ation that trans/form into each other ad eternal: E < = >I’
Indeed in the east Taoism affirms that all yangentropy has a drop of yin information for us to see, and all form has a drop of expansive motion ≈ entropy for us to receive.
As the present state requires a part of pastentropy and a part of futureinformation merging.
For that reason Minkowski affirms that without space time is nothing, without time space is a shadow; as one and the other coexist in spacetime beings. But we can also see space and time as states that follow each other in beings that perform spacelike action first and then timelike actions, and then spacelike actions as those shown in the graph – particles that stop and perceive, evolve entropy into information; waves that move and reproduce; stop and move sequentially in spacetime; stop and perceive space; moves.
In that regard the beats of timespace are many, departing from its fundamental properties and dualities. Yet what makes sense of it is precisely its oppositions, ratios, dualities, transformations and beats into each other. So the proper way to conceive those terms is dynamically as spacelike and timelike processes, Spe<≈>Tiƒ, and qualitatively, as a description of antinomies and properties that allow those transformations (as the bidimensionality of both, which makes possible to convert one into each other, its opposite topological properties – time being cyclical with more form, space planar, more extended; its sequential properties, informative time processes being longer in time smaller in space, and so on.)
It is then necessary to retrain the mind of the present ‘measureoriented scientist’ who works in a more automaton computerlike way, and make him accept that logic, ‘spirituallike’ properties related to time, causality, motion, form, ratio, antinomy, symmetry, scale DO play a far more important role to know the ‘thoughts’ of God than the details, which suffice to a visual practical description (as measure allows to manipulate reality) but does not provide the deepest meanings on why reality is ‘as it is’.
But all what ‘it is’ is in the ∆º±ST ternary elements of reality, so we can define for each of those processes timelike and spacelike events and topologies.
Timelike topologies, S>T are then defined topologically as those processes that implode space, accelerate time cycles and increase the form of the system.
Spacelike topologies T<S are then defined as those processes that explode space, decelerate timemotion and decrease the form of the system.
Timelike sequences are defined in concordance with that topology as implosive accelerated, final ‘age’, of a system, which however can at the end of the informative process split its future either emerging into ∆+1 (birth≈emergence into an upper scale) or dissolving into ∆1 (abortion≈death)
In the graph a wave is a spacelike reproductive sequence, a particle, a cyclical time like form that perceives. (Time and space being too confused at this point in history, we prefer to use more specific terms of gst and its time arrows).
Spacelike sequences are then defined as a process that increases the motion, entropy, limbs/fields of the system, which again does have two possible discontinuities at the end of the process, either the ’emergence into a reproductive phase’ of existence, when the absorption of entropy becomes converted into energy by the shape or constrains of one or two poles of information (i.e. a wave that becomes stationary, a child that enters adolescence), or alternately might by excess of motion start an entropic process of death and dissolution in ∆1 and expansion in space, T< S.
Which leads to the obvious understanding than in terms of ∆±1 scales, those processes that emerge into ∆+1 are timelike processes, which ad an emergent new wholelayer of organisation, which will coexist with the lower layers vs. ∆1 spacelike processes, which will dissolve a tighter configuration, releasing into chaos=freedom the particles/cells/citizens that were organised by Sstt networks, which therefore will expand and enter into entropic, free, ‘selfie’ state of collision and disintegration.
The Measure of time cycles: frequency.
Each clock creates a discontinuous spacetime, whose cyclical perimeter of information encloses a piece of energetic space breaking reality into ∞ formal patterns; different time cycles with specific forms and frequencies. Thus the use of a single human clock that equalizes all of them misses 2 features of each of those time cycles:
– Its specific forms of information in space.
– Its different speeds or frequencies. Since cyclical time is measured not by duration but by frequency, its inverse function: ƒ(t)=1/T.
– The temporal nature of masses and charges, which are not substances but vortices of time, clocks of the 2 main physical scales of the Universe – the quantum, electromagnetic and cosmological, gravitational scales. Masses and charges are defined in 5D by the frequency of its vortices that determines its force or attractive power.
They are also the first units of in/form/ation.
Thus, each mass and charge and its ‘Universal constants’ are invariant functions of their vortex frequency:
Sp=Mc^{2} + Sp=Hv > Mc^{2}=Hƒ> M= (H/c^{2})ƒ>M=Kƒ.
Masses are thus vortices of time and the faster they turn, and the smaller they are the more attractive are, as hurricanes are… being the black hole of cspeed of rotation, and smallish size the strongest clock of time of the Universe.
In the graph, masses and charges are accelerated vortices of time, ‘equivalent’ to inward, informative, cyclical motions, one of the two fundamental elements of the Universe.
But we have to distinguish the duality between masses proper that inform the sheet of gravitational space and charges that inform the sheet of light space starting the evolution of light into complex electronic forms including man.
Both can be related by a generic equation of all 3D time vortices, which differentiates them only by their Universal constants, U (T/S) or relative proportion of time and space of each membrane of the 5th dimension, which creates infinite relative membranes of spacetime.
This again as our ‘first’ definition of a dimension in proper logic terms, is a breakthrough obtained conceptually. Never a Universal constant has been properly understood.
Now we know what it is: a definition of the relative proportions of Spatial energy and temporal information of a sheet of spacetime.
Thus the gravitational constant is much weaker than the electromagnetic constant because it has a much larger spatial size, s and a much smaller quantity of information, t, so u=t/s is much smaller.
In fact form our perspective gravitational space is infinite and nonlocal, acting as if it were at infinite spacedistance (S=∞) and carrying 0 information.
So S x T = K, ∞ x 0 =k defines the metric of gravitational space from the p.o.v. of our lightspace perception.
It follows that such membrane if we were to transit from our membrane of light into the gravitational membrane, would REQUIRE a shift or change in the perception of speed and information, an equation that would TEND TO INFINITY and ZERO in those terms. And that equation is precisely the Lorentz Transformation that Einstein used to describe what happens as we cross the barrier of cspeed.
This resumes in its two fundamental equations: Sp X Tƒ = K, and Sp<=>Tƒ.
The constant transformation of one into another.
Despite their inversion, and this is the most important law of the Universe, Entropy and information constantly transform into each other. It is the principle of ‘conservation and transformation of Entropy back and forth into in/form/ation, forms in action’ which becomes the new fundamental law of the 4^{th} paradigm, widening the principle of conservation of Entropy:
‘All energies, trans/form constantly back and forth into information, Sp<=>Tƒ’
Thus the Universe is truly an eternal infinite of beats of Entropy warping into dimensional form, information and informations uncoiling into spatial Entropy. And since both elements Entropy and temporal information have motion this is possible as they are truly just the two extreme types of topological motions of the Universe, each one associated to a series of ‘functions’ and ‘perceptions’:
Entropy=Extension=Space= Fast motion = Lineal, planar shapes = Pleasure = Reproduction = Death
Information=Implosion=Time=Slow motion=Cyclical ball=Pain =Communication = Evolution = Life
The infinite balances and combinations of those two fields and its forms are the essence of reality.
The five åctions of Entropy and time performed by all species.
Since all is spacetime, all is Entropy and information; all is a sum of complementary entities of Entropy and information that perform 4 åctions in spacetime to enhance its survival:
Entropy feeding (e), information or perception of it (o), reproduction that combines both in other surface of spacetime (Sp X Tƒ) and finally social evolution, as a herd, ∑Sp X Tƒ, or as a network, ∑^{2}=∏, which as the reader can see summons up all the other arrows.
We call the composite, reproductive and evolutionary arrows, the complex arrows.
And so we can express all in the synoptic language of science with a simple equation that we call the fractal generator of the Spacetime Universe: ∑Sp X Tƒ
Since e and O are the two initial variables of reality, the program is selfevident, deduced from them and it proves itself by the experimental method (all is a complementary system of Entropy and information) and then by the logic of evolution: those 4 spacetime arrows encompass and explain all what exists in spacetime, and all åctions and isomorphisms of all sciences, as the are needed to survive.
Some of those sciences need some minor corrections to adapt it to the program, but most don’t; just a translation of jargons. Because of the importance of it, I believe it will start a new paradigm of science, the paradigm of ‘whys’, that would deepen the understanding of the ‘hows’ of the present age of knowledge, based in metric measure.
We shall prove that all systems are complementary systems of Entropy (Sp) and information (I), which combine both to perform ‘åctions’ in spacetime (Sp X Tƒ); most of them tending to absorb further Entropy (∆Sp) and information (∆) or ‘combine’ both in new ‘åctions’ and reproductive processes (Sp X Tƒ).
We call the 2 components of all systems (Sp and I) the simplex, primary åctionsarrows of spacetime, following the tradition of physical sciences; where action is their perception in space and arrow their perception in time. They are equivalent to the concept of the simplex ‘biological drives’ in biological sciences (feeding and perceiving Entropy and information); and the concept of ‘will’ or ‘greed’ – our desire for more Entropy and information, in psychology.
And we call the combination of those two primary åctions/arrows/drives/wills of ‘existence’ in space and time, the complex, secondary åctions/arrows: reproducing (Sp X Tƒ) and evolving socially, when we consider a sum of those åctions/arrows either in space or in time, ∑Sp X Tƒ (spatial analysis) or ∑ Sp <=>∏Tƒ.
The reader will observe that since we are referring to selfsimilar åctions/arrows/drives/wills in all scales, we need a suprajargon and formalism to unify them all, or else we would have to make such chains of similar concepts in each scale:
– We prefer the term reproduction to its different jargons: ‘iteration’ in mathematics, ‘decoupling’ in physics, ‘reproduction’ in biology, ‘memetic creation’ in culture, and ‘production’ in economics. And we prefer the terms Entropy instead of space and information instead of time cycles.
– We prefer the terms existence and extinction to the terms life and death; as they are inclusive of all entities of reality.
– We most often use the term åctions or time arrows instead of biological drives or will of existence. In that sense, we reduce spacetime åctions to the concept of time arrows as space is just a slice of the flow of cyclical time arrows that displace and change the spatial configuration of all the beings of the Universe – defined as the sum of all the cycles of time arrows of all its existential beings. Hence time includes space within it and such concept stresses a fundamental property of the Universe: all has motion and form, Entropy and in/form/ation.
Some key discoveries of General Systems will be difficult to overcome by mainstream science, specially physics, the oldest of all sciences and hence more prone to old errors of ‘Idols of the tribe of knowledge’ (Bacon), due to the ‘memetic=believer’ nature of the human brain, which as any system of information, reproduces its bits (genes and memes =theories), generation upon generation, regardless of its logic and experimental consistence (content of truth). The main error of classic physics concerns the nature of time as ‘what a clock measures’ (Einstein), and hence as a single timearrow of motion.
When time is any type of change and so we must define 4 arrows/åctions of spacetime as the fundamental types of change of all systems.
Of those 4 ‘type of universal åctions’; physics acknowledges only an arrow of time, entropy, the arrow of Entropy and motion, which is what it studies since Galileo’s analysis of the motion of weapons, and a type of clock, the mechanism constructed by him.
This was all right, as long as Physics did not pretend to be the philosophy of science of all other sciences, after the importance it acquired due to the Industrial Revolution of machines, they build. So today the reductionist studies of physics concerning spacetime åctionsarrows, where time has been spatialized and reduced to the arrow of energetic motion as the 4^{th} dimension of space, have become a dogma of all sciences, which hinders their understanding and the acceptance of General Systems sciences.
This goes to the extreme that physicists do not even accept information as an arrow of time, only entropy, which is an arrow deduced from studies of heat and electromagnetic forces. Fact is in physics there are two arrows/forces on the long range, energetic, expansive light and informative, attractive gravitation. And yet, memetic imprinting is so strong that still gravitation is not accepted as the informative element of our physical Universe.
Thus physics must be redone completely and simplified as Copernicus did when the sun was put in his place, with the concept of informative forces.
A second concept of enormous importance is the Paradox of Galileo: all moves even if it seems quiet. That is, time is the substance of reality, motions that change space beings and organisms along a time cycle. And since changes have different speed and life cycles different duration, time is not only multiple but has different speeds of change.
That is why we call also General systems sciences a theory of multiple spaces and times. Thus, for the physicist who is unfamiliar with the concepts of organicism and might resist them, with its mathematical, itifying perception of reality, my advice is to think of what he is going to read in terms of ‘åctions of Entropy and time’ and the relational concepts of Leibniz, and the relativity and ‘diffeomorphic’ principles of Einstein and the Principle of Complementarity of quantum physics and its fundamental equation, Sp X Tƒ = K. We shall see how indeed, as ‘properties’ of a smaller scale of the fractal universe emerge in the higher scale, the principles of geometry and quantum physics emerge also into higher scales, even in the human one.
Ternary organs; 3±1 ages. Organicism is the key to the Universe.
All this said it is obvious that those 4 åctions, used to define in the past the drives of biological beings, which feed, perceive, reproduce and evolve socially are now extended to all systems. Hence all what exists is in a way alive, as even the simplest quarks and electrons reproduce when they absorb Entropy, creating new particles. It is the egotrip of man, who wants to be the only sentient, vital being of the Universe, specially in the Western anthropomorphic tradition, what prevents the obvious similarity of all systems in all scales of reality, to become mainstream science. The astounding thing is that the anthropomorphic scientist does not recognize the fact that a machinelike Universe requires, as Leibniz explained to Newton, a God to make it, while only organicism is selfgenerating and hence ‘scientific’.
What is exactly an organism? Let us define it: An organism is a complementary system.
All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of Entropy and information, which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity selfsimilar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism; reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.
In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating selfsimilar particles.
In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides Entropy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce selfsimilar forms.
Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.
Yet what define an organism and all systems, as organisms are 3 derived facts:
 All those complementary systems perform 4 åctions that are mimetic to the 4 drives of existence of living beings (feeding, perceiving, reproducing and evolving socially).
 All complementary systems that work as independent wholes have 3 parts in space, the Entropy part, the information part and a ‘body’ that puts them together as a whole. And the forms and functions of those subsystems are related.
 Ternary principle in time: All systems live 3±1 ages of the life/death cycle: an energetic youth, a reproductive maturity and an old age of information, dying then in a bigbang expansion that erases its information.
III. BIOLOGIC SPACETIME.
Reproductive, Fractal differentiation. Evolutionary processes. Basic Laws.
Finally, another key element of all systems are the restrictions and favoured paths of reproduction and mutation or evolution of form.
Because there are only 3 functional forms in a 4dimensional universe (with 3 dimensions of form or space and one complex dimension of motion or time), morphological evolution is not random in choice but guided by the limits of 3 basic topologies, which will be expressed by morphological mutation: either an energetic membrane, toroidal bodyorgan or warped, linguistic mind will evolve positively or negatively in their parameters, which is often achieved changing the ‘speed’ of time of the process(so for example in human apes the brain bones grow faster than the chin, which grows faster in gorillas, and this change in an essential time parameter determines a functional change in form).
Thus while the variations might seem endless, in fact evolution is restricted by the limits of parameters of form and function, spatial changes in 3 dimensions and temporal parameters – the main tool for establishing those differentiations of a species into either + or – informative, reproductive or energetic growth and evolution.
A ternary process of ‘fractal differentiation’ is the key to understand the ‘speed’ and accuracy of evolutionary development: As a system evolves the 3 ‘diffeomorphic=local’ coordinates of the system – the top (information) – bottom axis, the backfront axis of motion, and the wide axis of structural form and reproductive storage, which are perpendicular to each other, are conserved.
The ‘emergence’ of the properties of previous scales defines this way the elements of the next scale.
They become in the electronic scale the ‘right hand rule’ between electric and magnetic fields; in carbohydrates, the key to understand the 3dimensional warping of DNA and proteins according to the different positions of its Cformal, Oenergetic and Ninformative parts. It will be then the ‘3 first genetic’ morphologies imprinted in the cells, with the ‘animal’ pole on top, from where the informative neuronal plate will develop. Then the foetus will define the anteroposterior axis of energetic motion and finally the widebilateral, reproductive axis of accumulation of cells.
Ternary principle in space and time: Finally a fundamental symmetry that we shall consider latter in more detail is that between the 3 forms, of space and the 3 dimensions of time, pastyouth, presentmaturity and informative, 3^{rd} age, as those topologies and its functions dominate in each age of time of the life/death cycle of the being, which goes from the causal, first element, the energetic, external sphere into the 3^{rd} causal element, the center of information that dominates the 3^{rd} age.
4. The actions of beings have a temporal order. Ternary ages and life/death cycles.
The dominant action any being performs is reproduction, exi=k. It is the ‘leit motiv’ of reality that happens when e=I. And so the ‘function of existence’, ∑ e x I, is maximized.
Reproduction and combination in a point of balance of e and I, that produces a quantum wave of selfsimilar seeds in a lower plane of existence, i1 happens in all scale and systems in the same manner.
Reproduction follows the same causal processes in any scale: two selfsimilar species with ‘opposite’ energyinformation coordinates (the definition of ‘gender’), in the case of particles, with opposite spin, produce a ‘seminal/cellular subparticle’, gluons in quarks as in the previous image or photons in electrons. And when the two subparticles merge their form and energy, they reproduce a ‘shower’ of new electrons or quarks. Thus the process is the same than in human beings and we can generalize the process for any system of any scale of the universe, with the notation of general systems as:
Reproductive action (any scale): exI (female) < = > Exi (male): exI_{i1 } x Exi_{i1 }= ∑ e x i.
So quarks reproduce other quarks colliding gluons as the previous graph shows and electrons colliding photons of higher energy, and the black holes of central galaxies emit jets of dense matter and cells, molecules of DNA.
In that sense, as the increasingly detailed analysis of gluons and electromagnetic flows show, we can talk of those ‘flows’ as micronetworks, similar to the nervous, endocrine and blood systems in our more complex superorganisms. And so the strong and electromagnetic forces do act in several scales, as it happens with the blood system that carries not only energy but also hormones – information… Within the structure of the atom we could consider the existence also of 3 physiological networks that correspond to the inner energetic system (electromagnetism), informative system and reproductive systems. And a fourth external ‘force’ that corresponds to the light we perceive but do NOT circulate inside us (the gravitational force).
Actions are processes with an increasing duration in time such as:
Informative action < Energetic action < Reproductive action < Social action.
And vice versa, given the opposition of properties between time and space, their range diminishes. This is the law of diminishing range of the forces that mediate those actions.
And so we can also connect those 4 arrows as a sequence in time: beings perceive and search for information to feed, and when they feed enough the reproduce, and when they reproduce a lot, they organize in social groups: E>I > exi (Reproduction) ∑ exi.
These beats of existence are the key to explain the evolutionary patterns of all systems, from the creation of the Universe as a whole, to the creation of life, to the science of morphogenesis and evol>devol to history and economics and the creation of its superorganisms.
Of all those temporal sequences the most important is the life/death cycle:
In the graph, the 4 arrows of spacetime have in most species a clear order in time:
– +1: Birth: We are born as a seed of information that:
Max. Energy: The being goes through an energetic youth of fast motions, in which the energetic limbs and external sensorial membrane dominates.
E=I: Balances energy and information in a mature, reproductive age, in which the internal, topological, reproductive system dominates.
– Max. Information: Till it warps all its energy into form, in the 3^{rd} age in which the central, hyperbolic, informative brain/particle singularity is dominant. This age ends in:
– 1: Death: Exploding back into energy, erasing its information in the process of death.
The long arrow from energy to information of ‘life’ E>I and its local short reversal from information to energy or ‘death’, I>E, becomes the cycle of existence and extinction of all complex systems of reality, from humans to matter (energy=gas state, liquid= reproductive state, solid=informative state), to the Universe itself from the big bang to the steady state to the Gödel’s vortex, described by the 3 solutions to Einstein equations, which must be ordered in time. In the next graph, we see some examples:
In the graph, most systems follow the ternary principle and have an energetic, informative & reproductive system. Such ternary systems follow the 3 symmetries of the complex Universe: the 3 ages in time of the system, dominated each one by a network (the energetic youth, reproductive maturity and informative, 3^{rd} age), the 3 topologies in space that define those networks (hyperbolic, informative center; planar or spherical, energetic limbs and membranes and toroid, cyclical, reproductive organs); and coexist 3 scales of existence – the cellular, organic and social scale, in which the organism becomes a unit of the next scale of reality.
So the study of systems through its dualities and its 3 symmetries of spatial form, temporal ages and scalar size, is the essence of the ternary method that we shall follow in this work to classify all physical species and study its evolution.
Those ternary ages and topologies are the foundations of a theory of multiple spaces and times, extended through several scales of reality, whose origin can be traced to the work of Leibniz on relational, multiple time cycles and vital spaces, but now truly acquire thanks to systems sciences all its solving power. Since we classify all space forms and time events in 3 topologies/ages that put together in social networks, create new (i+1) organic systems.
Thus the duality of energy and information and the ternary method is the key system used to resolve and reorganize the elements of physics, from the 3 ages of creation of matter (energetic gas, reproductive liquid and informative solid) to the study of particles and its social forms (the 3 families of increasing massinformation, the duality proton/neutron, quark/electron, strong/weak forces, gravitational/ electromagnetic membrane; the 3 ages of the Universe equivalent to the 3 solutions to Einstein’s equations – which are phases of evolution in time of the Universe that goes from a bigbang age, through a steady state into a Godelian vortex.
Topologic evolution: 3 ages of species.
In all spacetime scales species follow a future arrow towards more information, which increases in 3 horizons and finally evolves individuals into societies, herds and macroorganisms, related by a common language/network of information.
The process of evolution of species is equivalent to the 3±st ages of individuals with a twist: death is not the only ‘solution’ to the cycle, but the duality of ∂disintegration or ∫integration of a social group (in the case of life a cellular group), which defines the life/death cycle gives two choices to some ‘top predator’ informative species: After its 3 horizons or evolutionary ages the species might become extinct or transcend into a superorganism.
In the graph, the seminal, 1^{st} species packs a lot of information in minimal space: It is the Worm Hole, the chip, the 1^{st} bilateral animal^{2}, the 1^{st} mammal, the horse and the 1^{st} Homo Sapiens, which seem to have evolved from a dwarf ancestor, which first discovered technology and had a dwarf brain, albeit with an evolved morphology similar to that of the Homo Sapiens: the Homo Floresiensis^{3}.
Then the new ‘highly informative’ top predator follows in its evolution a plan of dimensional evolution that transforms species with a high content of energy into species with a high content of information through 3±st horizons, selfsimilar to the ages of an individual organism. Since species are, in fact, macroorganisms in which each cell is an individual of the species.
First in its ‘energetic youth’, the species grows in size as horses, humans, bilateral animals or black holes do.
Then the species suffers a reproductive radiation colonizing new ecosystems.
Next the species suffers a speciation, according the ternary principle into 3 subspecies, one dominant in energy, another in information and a 3^{rd} one balanced in both parameters.
– Finally, a new top predator extinguishes the species or the informative one evolves into social organisms of different complexity, stronger than the individual and survives.
Further on, evolution, as the analysis of the complex plan of ‘speciation’ shows, has two paths: social evolution of ‘external’ energetic bodies (the herdstate, of lesser efficiency and higher spatial extension) and social evolution of ‘internal’ informative organs.
In cells, this give birth to the two main arrows of cellular evolution: muscles, single cytoplasmic cells with multiple nuclei; and neurons single, dense nuclei with multiple cytoplasmic branches (dendrites).
In Physical systems to ‘quark condensates’ (neutron and black hole stars) vs. molecular, external fusion.
Finally in the evolution of species, we have also the causal rhythms between the dominance of each arrow, similar to the ‘ages’ of life, as a species is the life of a ‘cellular’ parental father, reproduced into multiple individuals that will become extinguished, often substituted by a sonspecies (Oedipus paradox). And the rhythm parallel to that of climatic change is simple:
Small informative seed (first small speciesfoetus)> Energy feeding (growth) > The young age of the species/individual shows a growth in size > Reproductive/radiating age> follows by a reproductive expansion of the species as a new ‘top predator’, while the individual gives birth to an offspring> Informative age/diversification of the species > extinction/death & survival of the son species.
This simple scheme applies to the analysis of the ‘frozen horizons’ of the bigbang and the particles created; to the evolution of species, which appear in the fossil record small in size (1^{st} bilateral vernanimancula, 1^{st} modern mammal (shrewd), 1^{st} horse, 1^{st} human with technological/speech skills (Homo floresiensis?), first ‘selfreproductive machine’ (chipped nanobacteria?)…
Recap. The simple, morphological plan of evolution that each fractal species of the Universe repeats is caused by the fact that there are only 2±1 forms in the Universe, lineal energy and cyclical information and i=ts reproductive, body combination. So only 3 new types of species can be created, one with more energy, one with more information and one that reproduces both.
The meaning of evolution and temporal dimensions: Max. Epast x Ifuture = Present.
Let us now consider a more complex application of those previous laws of all systems: the meaning of past, present and future, which is a consequence of the causal order between those arrows:
Perception>Energetic feeding>Reproduction>Linguistic, social evolution.
In turn that order defines in a longer timespan/scale of existence the causal order of a life/death cycle:
Informative seed>Youth>Reproductive maturity>Informative 3^{rd} age and death…
And in turn that order defines in a longer timespan, the ages of a species, which is born as a small, more evolved form that > Grows in size > Radiates and expands as a new predator > Diversifies informatively in multiple species > evolves socially in a complex superorganism (ant hills, human societies) or become extinguished by new, more evolved, often ‘son’ species (Oedipus paradox.
Now when we combine all those facts we can define the 3 dimensions of time, the relative informative future as systems become warped and evolve in its 3^{rd}, informative age; the relative past of formless energy, and youth, and the relative present of iterationreproduction that seems never to change. And we shall see that this is indeed what all systems do in higher measure.
Thus once more we see that not only absolute time is an integrative concept of many time cycles, but the concepts of past, present and future are also relative perceptions in a Universe in which the sum of all life, informative arrows masterminded by these Points of View, and energetic, devolving, simplifying past arrows of entropic motions become a relative present, eternal reality of multiple systems that reproduce iterations of themselves. And latter we shall see they do so through ‘fractal selfgenerating, feedback equations of information’ of which the synoptic one that resumes all of them is E<=>I.
IV.
HUMAN SPACETIME: MINDS.
SENTIENT PROPERTIES OF SPACETIME: BEATS OF EXI=STENCE.
A second important ‘theme’ of all those background independent theories, as time and space is now the nature of beings itself, is to realise that timespace has both time motion and spatial form and one cannot exist without the other.
Hence beings are made of ‘motions with form’, information & energy (information being dominant in form, energy in entropic motion). So beings are made of e x i, and this quantity is called ‘action’. Again this realisation still illunderstood was first proposed by the Great Leibniz, in pure philosophical reasoning; and proved right by Planck as the Unit of reality was an action of energy and time (Information in Einstein’s work). the substance of the Universe is motion, and its intelligence the ‘fleeting mayas’ of synchronous forms that come together very much in a magic ‘way’ by simultaneity and synchronicity.
So the sum of actions, and the synchronicity of its beats≈frequencies is what creates the spatial complex beings we observe..
Again, it would be Leibniz by the power of pure intellect who realized that beings were apparently ‘isolated’ from each other, synchronised by the harmony of its clocks of time/information, and by an inner ‘window to infinity’ – the conniption of each monadmindmirror of the Universe with lower and upper scales, through which communication with the whole was possible.
But what created the synchronicities of space that seem intelligently web the three arrows of time into coherent organic structures?
Of course the mindmirrors of the Universe, its Tiƒ monads, which we shall call singularities, to fully upgrade the intuitions of Leibniz to hard science, as they do indeed become mirrors that reflect back the order they have perceived, as they created their linguistic mind from pure motion, till reaching its synchronous spatial stillness, into reality reordering them. And so in this constant game between mirrorminds and reality, the Universe of infinite worlds, all of them different as they occupy a different relational position in space, (again an astounding foresight of Leibniz) reality happens and evolves.In the graph in the right the primary process of linguistic creation departing from experienced reality into the mind mirror. In the left, the inverse process of influence on reality as the mind mirror increases the order by ‘imposing it’ on its external territory in the physical world. Through eons this process has created the Universe and its infinite various on the same theme.
The aggregation of timespace actions, ±∆e xi, st, in which a system emits and absorbs energy and information evolving socially with similar Œpoints to form social wholes somehow become ordered into a finite pattern, which is a world cycle of life and death.
this is the most mysterious, fascinating, when understood intelligence of the Universe: how the actions of individual selfish selfcentred points of view, observing and absorbing energy and information for its own advantage end giving up that energy and information and dying, and yet at the same time, if reproduced, will endure its own game.
The next level thus after the analytical level of the fast timespace actions of physical space is the synthetic level of biological organic spacetime ages and world cycles of change of the inner parts of the system through those actions which accumulate in time, integrating into the 3 ages of the system.
We have studied in the first ‘sentence’: 3 Time motions x Infinitesimal ‘still spaces’ = ±∆actions; the detailed, minimal spacetime cyclical actions of the Universe performed by each Œpoint, as it tries to preserve its temporal existence
This first level of awareness of reality is mostly a topologic, mental point of view, as a given ‘particlepoint’ defines its actions of exchange of energy and information ±∆(a,e,i,o,u) in order to survive, reproduce and ensure the immortality of its ‘logic form’. In this game, each point will however fail to survive as an individual ‘zero point, an egocenter with a mapping of ‘still spatial memorial’ images of reality stored in its ‘time wave of past’ with a synoptic, logic temporal language of minimal ‘volume’≈storage. So we humans die away but leave the genetic trace of our sons.
Our memorial verbal mind however disappears. If we consider the smaller pointparticles of the Universe, electrons and quarks, and photons, they might not record any ‘trace’ of its motions, within its topologic brain but then again, the existence of spooky quantum effects (synchronicity between entangled particles) and the hypothesis of infinite scales theoretically proved by the infinity of digits in irrational numbers and the unification equation of charges and masses, as 2 relative vortices of time, might make each atom a galaxy of a lower scale, hence each proton a black hole of a galaxy of a lower scale with plenty of informative storage to record the entire actions of the galaxy (the black hole in fact has an ‘homunculus’ equation, since in 5D metric its equations are homologous to those of the galaxy in 4 D).
All this said, the reader should realise that ‘existence’ and ‘survival’, is the ‘goal of the will of each point of view’.
And yet all of them fail and go through the sequential order of its timespace actions from an energetic youth of maximal ±∆e motions and feeding, to a balanced age of maximal ∆iteration, and reproduction, into a 3rd age of maximal ∆o,∆u, information and integration as part of a whole social system, in which the entity will perform actions for the larger whole or social group (from its family to its society). Why there is such sequential order in 3 ages that precludes the extinction of all spatial minds and memories? We might say that time motions keep erasing the past, as there is not in the total Universe enough storage for its information.
The past becomes then a fading track of those motions, but, and this would surprise the biased, subjective mindoriented linguistic brain of the logicomathematicalverbal scholar, minds is what the universe of time motions does not conserve, spaceinformation in stillness dies away as motions are eternaL. The Universal substance is motion, spacestillness is mostly a recess, a mirage of the still mind. So motion continues, switching from action to action, from expansive, entropic energetic motions of death to informative, accelerated, cyclical vortices of logic time, and only the present dynamic repetition, iteration, reproduction of fleeing spaces preserves part of those memories reproduced in new games.
In this post we shall thus study the straightjacket of existence – the world cycle between birth and extinction that all species follow as they travel through the planes of the 5th dimension. We shall describe that world cycle for all systems of the Universe, which become in space superorganisms, U∆±1 displayed across 3 scales of existence, and in time, world cycles that integrate all its actions in a ‘Hamiltonian pattern’, with a max. point of energy a balanced stationary E=I point of adult maturity and reproduction and a 3rd maximal age of information and minimal age of energy, prior to its explosion of entropic motion, erasing of memorial past and death.
Topology: 3 manifolds
We are all spacetime isomorphisms. The best way to describe those st parallelisms between species, is by considering topology, the branch of mathematics which study forms with inner motion (deformation) and its varieties that put together creates the organisms and structures of the living universe.
This is possible since ‘pure space’ and ‘pure time’ dimensions are abstractions that do not correspond to ‘objective’ reality where space and time dimensions, ‘form’ and ‘motion’ come together. And so the branch that describes both, topology, is the fundamental branch of mathematics.
Further on, what we perceive, and what interacts with the external world is always a bidimensional membrane, not the whole 3 dimensional system, so the so called 3varieties of a 2manifold (bidimensional) surface become the 3 fundamental ‘parts’ of any system. And they correspond to the 3 ‘Bidimensional’ forms in motion of the Universe, which we call:
– Spacetime EnTROpy (expansive motion, toroid topography), combination of ‘length’ and an expansive, young state.
– Spacetime Information (implosive motion, spherical topography), combination of ‘height’ and an inward, warping, old stage: Tƒ = Sh x Tƒ
– And its energetic spacetime combinations (repetitive motions, hyperbolic topography) combination of width and a present, iterative motion that seem not to change.
All what you see from the humblest chair or the smallest atom to the biggest galaxy or the most complex human being is an iteration of 3 unique topologies of a 2dimensional space.
One of the most important problems of topology is the search for a classification of manifolds up to topological equivalence. Ideally, for each dimension ∆, one would like to produce a list of ∆dimensional manifolds, and a theorem that says every ∆dimensional manifold is homeomorphic to exactly one on the list.
The theorem would be even better if it came with a list of computable topological invariants that could be used to decide where on the list any given manifold belongs. To make the problem more tractable, it is common to restrict attention to compact manifolds, which can be thought of as those that are homeomorphic to closed and bounded subsets of some Euclidean space. Precisely such a classification theorem is known for 2manifolds.
The first part of the theorem says that every compact 2manifold is homeomorphic to one of the following: a sphere, or a doughnut surface with ∆ 1 holes, or a connected sum of ∆ 1 projective planes. The second part says that no two manifolds on this list are homeomorphic to each other. It means we need ‘surgery’ , tearing, ‘hurting’ the organism to break the variety of the manifold. And since this would upset the functions and health of the super organism, we are left with the 3 fundamental varieties of a bidimensional space, to construct the ‘wholes’ of all the systems of the Universe.
In the 2 previous graphs we can see the structure of all systems with an external, Max. Sp. toroid Limbs that move the system, an internal, Max.Tƒ, zero point and a hyperbolic, Sp=I, Max. ExI, organic, reproductive structure that puts together and maintains both, the membrane and limbs that move the body and the still, informative cyclical point that maps and gauges reality.
We conclude that the minimal Unit of the Universe is a 2manifold, as pure time or pure space, pure yin or pure yang, pure motion or pure formstillness cannot be perceived. So all what exists is a 2 manifold that we might perceive as static space (a 2manifold sheet) or as a point with motion, (where motion is one time dimension and the point, the minimal fractal unit also with a 1 dimension – as there is not 0dimensional, ‘euclidean points’ in the Universe).
Now, the Universe is a sum of motions through the 5th dimension, as only when motion exists we need to define a space (the form that moves) and time (motion). And so epistemology is the knowledge about a being of the maximal information about its ST events which is all what exists, of truth
The language will reduce that truth 1 to a 2manifold mental mapping of it.
The worldcycles of Nature.
Now, if you have gone so far, you probably understand that there are infinite time clocks, they are all cyclical paths, and they are all storing and processing information. So really what time is the different rhythms of processing information of beings, and that obviously changes. Consider yourself, you are born with a lot of lineal motion, and little information, you keep acquiring information till old age, and then you die and erase your information, ending your time lifecycle, back to the beginning of your process – the seminal dissolution of your cells.
The galaxy goes through an age of implosive creation of form, from vacuum space – so Einstein said that time curves space into mass, but then a quasar explodes the galaxy that throws information into space: E < = Mc2. Again we see a similar worldcycle Soon we will define those cycles with mathematical equations for different time cycles and quanta of space. But we are MORE interested in the qualitative nature of those processes.
What it is clear is that all systems perform those time cycles with the same pattern, going from an age of maximal lineal motion or youth into an old age of cyclical information and then back in the process of death to the dissolution of cyclical form into planar expansive motion – disaggregation of cells, of matter into energy etc.
So time is NOT a steady constant tic as the mechanical clock of humans in nature, time can accelerate, decelerate or move at steady speed for each system moving and this is one of the many deformed features of reality which Physicists have made canonical errors of our universal world view by putting ‘first his mechanisms’ over theory.
So what is the rhythm of time? Simply speaking, a series of worldcycles of life and death, of expansive and implosive motions, ordered in a natural manner in all systems of the Universe.
Now remember, I told you i was the chair of duality, expanding our understanding of the Universe with both arrows, entropy and information? So this is so far what I have tried to do now, but to fully complete the world cycle of a black hole we need the 3rd dimension of time. What can this be? If we have already entropy, disorder, the erasing of information? And we have information, order, the natural arrow of life towards an old informative age, in a fractal universe of infinite spacetime beings?
Well, if we call youth, the past, with maximal Sp/Tƒ, density of energy (so you move a lot) and Tƒ/Sp, the old age of information, as we do in life, in this planet, in the galaxy moving towards the central informative black hole, as we move from the relative energetic past into the future informative maximal Tƒ age, we must cross through a central region where Sp=Tƒ, or present region. So we call:
Sp (spatial past) > ST (PreSenT) > Tƒ (Future Informative Time)
The equation of the 3 ages of a world cycle. Look how clever the symbols are sp spatial past, Tƒ, Temporal Future. Ha, ha, it took me a decade to find them.
SPACE TOPOLOGIES & TIME DIMENSIONS≈AGES
Actions of Existence.
The metaphysical arguments though are conceptual expressions of what can be written in an algebraic form as a ‘Fractal feedback generator’ equation, which in this case generates the pieces of timespace that make up the Universe:
Sp<=>Tƒ
Whereas Sp is spatial energy, Tƒ, temporal information and <=> the 3 dynamic arrows of time, energy flows, repetitive flows and informative flows. The multiple ways in which this Generator equation ‘generates’ all realities is the ‘details’ of that fundamental thought of God: ‘Exi=st’.
How to formalise the motions of those existential Œpoints as they travel=exist through the 5th dimension, is the next notch of indepth knowledge of T.Œ, the Time theory of NonEuclidean points with energy and information, space and time parts. So we shall now go deeper once we have clarified the basic concepts of T.Œ and introduce the formalism of sequential, existential algebra, as we did in the previous post with NonE, ilogic geometry.
I have chosen often two words, ‘existences’, written cryptically as ∑exi=STences, species of spatial energy and temporal information, of each plane of existence.
I prefer existence as a synonymous of vital spacetime. So we talk of each of us and all realities as functions of existence, Œ, or functions of spacetime, with the osymbol for time heads/particles and the Spcycle for the limb/field system orientated in 3 vectorial dimensions of space.
Therefore Timespace Algebra, in metaphysical terms, is called Algebra of Existence, æ, and so the tale of each of us is explained with the symbols of Existential algebra, from zero to zed the beginning of a new cycle.
We shall in the longer iteration of this post, introduce the text with all the symbolsequations of the function of existence, as it goes from alpha to omega, from cyclical actions into generations, deploying a game which in essence, related to all those logic equations of Existential algebra, is always a world cycle of life and death, birth in a lower scale as a relative Θi1 mindpoint of static information, who ‘wakes up’ and moves and through actions of energy and information, exchanged with the Universe grows, through stairs of clonic social scales, becoming herds and organisms, till finally collapses into a super organism of a higher plane of the 5th dimension, as a Universals of its initial seed of time space, such as:
 Ω. Worldcycle, Conception: U∆1<∑U∆1>U∆
The tale of this game which is our ‘existences’ between birth and extinction is the common game that relates in the longtime duration of the 5th dimension, the story of everything. Everything and this philosophers have not explored clearly, mathematicians ignore completely, is a world cycle in time, a birth development and extinction, alpha and Omega, Ω, the symbol we use for a world cycle, of 3±1 ages in time and its symmetric 3±∆ diffeomorphic=local organs of space.
A Universe of åctions of ‘—motions’ and information.
Once we have established the existence of a Universe of motions in time and forms of space, whose organic parts are guided by the ‘will’ of the 4 main arrows of time, we can respond to the fundamental questions about man and the Universe – why we are here, what we are. And the answer is obvious: since we are all complementary beings, made of ‘—motions’ and information, we exist to combine, absorb and reproduce ‘—motions’ and information, SxT; what we constantly do through åctions that imprint our form and deliver it, carried by a flow of ‘—motions’= motion. We make åctions of ‘—motions’ and temporal information. So we often say ‘I don’t have time and ‘—motions’ to do this’.
This simple expression, SxT, is therefore the unit of reality, an action, specific of each species, which will imprint the external world with its form and ‘—motions’, as many times as it does. Yet åctions are also fractal, discontinuous, quantic ‘steps’. And so we define for each system, including the biggest systems of reality (the gravitational and lightspace membranes we inhabit), a minimal ‘existential unit’, or action that defines the system:
Sp x Tƒ=ST=Action of existence.
In all systems we shall find such åctions: the hPlanck constant is the minimal action of the lightmembrane; in the gravitational world a Lambdastring is its minimal action.
When we humans live, we constantly act with ‘‘—motions’’ an time, performing cycles of existence, whose minimal åctions is a ‘thought’, an act of perception (I think therefore I am), which takes a second of time, our existential beat. In Physical systems, åctions can also be translated as momentum (m(Tƒ) x V(Sp)); in biological systems, SxT will define the ‘existential force’ of a top predator.
In the economic world an action is a minimal quantity of a Company, the Free Citizen of the Economic ecosystem that re=produces machines, money and weapons and structure the financialmilitaryIndustrial complex in which we live. In a wave of light it is the minimal step, as the wave reproduces its form over the surface of magnetic and electric quanta (constants of vacuum). There are in that sense many ways to define an action but in most cases, as its formula indicates, it will be an action of reproduction that imprints a form on a surface of ‘—motions’; and therefore also the minimal unit of ‘form’ display but any existential system.
The Universe is organic, not mechanical. But to fully understand this fact we have to upgrade the 4D abstract paradigm of physical sciences to a larger view and understanding of the world cycles of all physical, biological and sociological systems of the Universe.
The organic structure of the Universe is proved by a series of common properties, which we call ‘isomorphisms’ that all systems follow, themselves based in the existence of 3 ‘logicomathematical’ properties observed from that Universe:
Topological Properties studied by ŒGeometry Temporal Properties studied by ÆAlgebra Infinitesimal Properties studies by Analysis. Now we must understand the foundation of physical sciences, to be the GalileanEinsteinian relativity explained by Poincare: we cannot distinguish motion from form. So we have two states, one of still space and one of spatial form.
Yet since stillspace and motiontime are two states of the same being, we say that all beings are dual systems of space and time, and to understand how of this simple duality all other beings form, we must consider the next stage which is the beat between both states, which need a transitional dual zone of decelerations and accelerations to move from stop to go states. This results in 2+2 elements, the 2 still and steady state motion inertial states, and the 2 transitional acceleration and deceleration, and we call the 4 forms of motions as:
Spacestill form no motion death.
First age of life, decelerating young motions.
Steady state, time, present state.
And future, informative cyclical motion, accelerated towards…. big bang of death.
And thus we deduce from the simplest fact that there are motion and stillness, space and time the equation of the lifedeath cycle that defines all systems of the Universe as organic:
All systems are a sum of quantic cycles that absorb, emit and transform spatial energy into temporal information. That equation, decomposed sequentially in 3 phases, a first age of max. energy, a second age of balance and a third age of max. information, explains the existential cycle of any spacetime field.
In a graph with energy and information coordinates those 3 ages resemble the geometrical form of a cycle that moves upwards, absorbing energy and information till in its 3rd age looses its temporal energy, collapsing back to its origin. On the right side, the same 3 ages show in the Taoist, Korean flag, where a line is the symbol of continuous yangenergy, which yintime quantizes into ‘information’, from youth to death.
The 3 ages of existence.
The fundamental consequence of the dual, quantic arrows of the Universe is the dual process of life and death that affects all spacetime beings. After conception as an informative seed, (+1) all beings go from an age of maximum energy (youth) into an age of increased information (old age).
Yet, when all the energy is transformed into information, the species collapses and information dies (1), exploding back into cellular energy. So we talk of an existential cycle between conception (+1) and death (1) with 3 ages. The cycle of existence from youthenergy into a 3rd age of information, and back again dissolving yourself into the Universe, is natural to all beings made of spatial energy and time since energy always transforms itself into information back and forth. Look at humans. Young people have a lot of energy but little information.
Mature people have both energy and information. While old people have a lot of information drawn into their wrinkles and minds, but little energy. So as time goes by, human beings go through 3 ages, called youth, the age of energy; maturity, the age of reproduction; and old age, the age of form and wrinkles, of information and memories.
The 2 arrows of spacetime existence are in Philosophy the arrows of life and death; evolution and devolution; creation of form, of information and extinction, release of form into energy. Taoist philosophers represented the “life and death cycle” with the yinyang cycle that moves forwards, turns around and then returns backwards till closing the cycle. Buddhists represented it with Mandalas that they erased periodically to express the metaphor of life and death. The cyclical, quantic nature of spacetime implies a reality with 2 opposed temporal directions.
A bidimensional cycle is a representation of those 2 spacetime arrows that move back and forth. Yet the 4 dimensional geometry of the Universe is also cyclical, as it seems to fluctuate between the “explosive bigbang” and the “implosive bigcrunch”. Since all is quantic, all has a limit in spacetime, including the Universe.
So when the spacetime of the Universe comes to an end it will fall back into the big crunch. So in the field equations of Einstein time curves and gives information to space, creating masses but then the information of those masses explodes into spatial energy according to Einstein’s second fundamental equation, E=Mc², and then the mass dies.
Einstein studied that dual process for the entire Universe, which is a flat surface of vacuum energy that masses and black holes curve in the dimension of height.
While Theory of Evolution studies the process in life, which also started as a ‘flat’ surface of cellular energy without form, that evolutionary information warped, raising it to the height of man. Then, when the quantic spacetime cycle of a human being comes to an end, we become warped and wrinkle and die, exploding back into cellular energy much faster than the Universe, since we have far less ‘content of time’.
Since those are similar processes in all quantic spacetime species we talk of 3 ‘ages’ in any spacetime field between conception and death, a first age of pure energy, the bigbang youth of growth and expansion; a second age of balance that happens between the spatial energy and temporal information of the being or ‘steady state’, and a third age of warping and collapse that ends in death, when all forms dissolve back into the energy that informative time had evolved.
More over, those 3 age are mathematically equivalent to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s general equations of spacetime, which have been wrongly taken as 3 different Universes, when merely represent the same Universe through its 3 ages.
After all Einstein also talks on how ‘time curves space’.
Yet Einstein only applied those solutions to the entire Universal spacetime while quantic spacetime widens its application, accepting that each quantic piece of reality obeys those 3 solutions, passing through the 3 ages of spacetime.
Quantic spacetime means that we can study those 2 arrows through its S, SxT, T, ternary ages, not only for the absolute Universe as Einstein did, but also for each of its pieces and species, which have shorter lives: All of them show in their existence both arrows, as they expand in their youth, their energy age; combine energy and information in its mature, classic age, often reproducing its quantic nature in other zone of reality to achieve a certain degree of immortality; and finally they warp in their old, informative ages.
For example, I am a quantic spacetime field called Luis Sancho, warping, passed my youth, into my old age of growing information… We are all limited pieces of space that live a quantic time and then disappear back into the dust of spacetime that made us. On the other hand, cyclical spacetime implies that while all forms of reality disappear, the logic game of space/time is eternal, because while some beings evolve others devolve, while some live others die and therefore both directions of time balance into an eternity of quantic cycles.
So LaoTse said: ‘The game of yinyang is eternal, its forms are not’.
The spacetime field quantic equation.
Tƒ represent those 2 arrows of spacetime fields we formalize spacetime fields through the Equation of 5D Space/Time that defines any spacetime field as a series of quantic, cyclical structures that transform constantly energy into information and vice versa through a series of basic phases or ages that conform the life and death of the field:
S=>T (arrow of informative Life)+ T<S, (arrow of energetic death): Sp<=>Tƒ
The 1^{st} arrow of ‘informative life’ is in fact the sum of 3 partial phases of a spacetime cycle:  S; or energetic youth, when the being has more energy than information.
– S=T; or state of dynamic balance reached as energy becomes transformed into information.  >T; or informative, old age, when most energy has become wrinkled into information.
– Followed by the inverse arrow of death, T<S, or explosion of information into energy, when the 2 elements of the organism, its energetic and temporal field, split, breaking its organic balance:
– The Lorenz transformations show how that S=T balance break in physical particles.
– While in life the mind of an old man becomes childish and the body keeps wrinkling till it completes his cycle. So the disconnection between body and brain provokes his death. Both arrows together create an actionre action event, a lifedeath, a spacetime cycle: Spe<=>Tiƒ.
Physics reduces the 3 phases of that ternary equation to one, Tƒ<Spe, the arrow of disorder, lineal energy, entropy and death, which now we widen to include the 2nd arrow of reality, the arrow of order, information and temporal evolution, relating both arrows into a single, unified spacetime field. And we affirm that:
‘All what exists is a system that transforms back and forth, quantic pieces of spatial energy into temporal information, shaping spacetime cycles’.
So the Quantic SpacesTimes equation defines in mathematical terms any event and form of quantic spacetimes, and widens the arrow and law of Energy Conservation, the main Law of Science, to include the arrow and principle of Conservation of Temporal Information. The Quantic SpacesTimes equation is to quantic space/time what Einstein’s field equation is to continuous, spacetime.
The 3 ages of existence of human beings, matter, stars and Universes.
With those formal equations we can describe the existence of a spacetime organism, as a development of the Quantic SpacesTimes equation, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages /horizons, S <=> and T: +1: The cycle or organism starts its existence when its spacetime field is created. Sp: It is the first horizon or ‘energy, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. Spx min. T. <=>: S=T. It is the balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.
ST: Max. T x min. S: it is the 3rd age of the cycle when information has combed and exhausted the spacetime field that warps into itself.
– 1: It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.
Those phases of a spacetime cycle are the engines of ‘existence’, which is an infinite sum of space/time fields, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages.
Yet its applications are far wider, as the horizons, ages or phases of a spacetime field go beyond the realm of quantic physics into State Physics, where gas is the energy state, liquid the balanced state and solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a spacetime system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (min.Sp x max.Tƒ) and a form of pure space, the big bang (max.Sp x min. Tƒ); into Biology, where it describes the 3 ages of living beings or the 3 horizons of evolution of species and into Social Sciences, where it applies to the organic description of the life and death of civilizations and its artistic forms:
Age of Energy, Classic age of Harmony, Old Age of information, Explosion and Death:
Human: Youth (020a.) Maturity (2040). 3rd age and death (6080).
Culture: Epic, Lineal Art. Realist, Classic Art. Baroque Art. War.
Matter: t<tS: Plasma Max. S: Gas S=T:Liquid Max. T:Solid T(Mc^{2})<<S
Star: t<tS:Nebula. Max. S: Giant star. S=T: Sun. Max. T: White Dwarf. T<<SpNova
Galaxy:t<tS: Jet Max.S: Irregular. S=T Spiral<=>Elliptic. Max.T:Globular T<<S:Quasar
Universe: t<tS: Bigbanging; S=T:Stationary; Max.T:Vortex (Bigcrunch); T<<S:Bigbang
In the graph, the singularity that existed prior to the big bang was an ‘old form’, Max.T=Min.S, of max. temporal information, defined by its minimal spatial size, which exploded into pure space, the bidimensional sheet of energy of the ‘young’ Universe, Max.S=Min.T, a form with minimal time and maximum space that now starts to curve again with time, creating the eternal cycle of the Universe, described by General Relativity in terms of its total spacetime.
The parameters of ST fields: Speed, density and force of existence.
The previous simple definition of the Universal bigbang cycle shows how revealing can be the Quantic SpacesTimes formalism. In that sense Quantic spacetime is more interested in ‘morphological changes’ than in ‘translation changes’ studied by classic Physics. Yet both disciplines use some basic mathematical concepts to formalize those processes of change. The 3 fundamental ones are:
– ‘Speed’, which measures the ratio of change between space and time parameters. Galileo formalized translation change with the equation of translation speed, V=S/T. In Quantic SpacesTimes fields we use the same formula, V=S/T, to measure ‘existential speed’, the morphological change between the inner proportions of spatial energy and temporal information accumulated by any being, that change with the 3 ages of any spacetime field:
Thus the speed of existence is maximum at the beginning of the cycle, in the age of energy or youth, when S>T, and hence V=S/T>1.
In its mature age, the speed of existence hardly changes as the energy and information of the being are in balance: S=T, V=S/T=1.
Next, in the third, old age of the being when information dominates, the speed of existence is minimal, as T>S, and so S/T<1. Then, when the being goes out of balance, as most energy becomes transformed into information and its speed of existence, Min.S/Max.T, tends to zero, death happens.
So the energy and information of the spacetime field break apart and information explodes back into energy. Now the speed of existence cannot longer be measured, becomes a mathematical uncertainty. Graph shows how energy and time change through those 3 ages, giving way to different e/t ratios for each being and each age.
Those proportions are, in fact, the ‘scientific constants of existence’ of each species, that show the ratios of energy and information of any being, which remain stable during each age, suffering with the transition between ages and specially at birth and extinction an accelerated ‘peak’ of change. Those constants do exist for the physical systems of the Universe and its forces and particles, (G, c, l.).
Yet since the Universe is enormous and lasts billions of years, as their fundamental particles do, Universal constants seem to us ‘absolutely constant’. However in a smaller system such as a chemical re action, they change very fast. – The density of information, D=T/S, is the inverse function of speed, which shows the informative density and complexity of an spacetime field.
And spacetime force’, TxS, which measures the quantity of spatial energy and temporal information of the field caused by the combined ‘quantic action’ of its energy delivered in a period of time, during which the spacetime field ‘interacts’ or ‘reacts’ to the quantic action of other spacetime field. In Biology it defines a ‘top predator’ as a species with maximum energetic and informative force; that is, with the stronger body and fastest mind.
Most constants and laws of science describe specific spacetime fields through its speed (S/T), density (T/S) or spacetime Force (SxT). For example, the Planck’s constant is a product between Time and Energy.
While a molecular temperature is defined as the ratio between pressure, a temporal parameter and speed, a spatial parameter: P(t) V (s)=nRT. And so it measures the minimal quantic action of the world of atomic particles. On the other hand, the spacetime force of a being is equivalent to the Physical momentum of a particle, M(T) x V(S), or product of its temporal mass and spatial speed. And indeed, the particle with bigger momentum is also the top predator physical particle that survives in any collision.
The classic age of a being and the limits of existence. We know by experience that the spacetime force of a being is maximal in its mature, classic age. Now we can easily prove it in mathematical terms. Since a product maximizes when T=S, which defines precisely the age of maturity.
For example, if S+T=10, then 5×5=25 > 4×6=24 > 3×7=21. Thus t=e maximizes the TSforce of any organism, because when Spis proportional to T, the being maximizes the coordination and communication between the cellular elements of the body and the informative neurons of its brain and so it works smoothly, efficiently: SxTi(t=s) ≈ max. ST.
Thus, the dominant age of any species is the ‘classic age’ of STbalance and reproduction or ‘steady state’ that elongates the life span of all beings, as their systems maintain their symbiosis.
Those constant proportions make any ST system efficient. So most ‘survival species’ keep harmonic ratios of energy and information, which produce the most ‘beautiful forms’. Since beauty is precisely the perception of an efficient, top predator form with balanced energy and form.
Yet when the S/T proportions are out of balance in the youth and third age of a being, the excess of energy or information often ‘kills’ the species. Science expresses those balances through all kind of Physical, Mathematical and Biological constants that range from the golden ratios of architecture and natural organisms, to the organic constants of biological species. So we define another essential law of quantic spacetime, the law of harmony between energy and information, body and brain, mass and speed (momentum), which in biological, human or physical systems creates the most efficient systems of the Universe.
All organisms are defined by an ‘equation of organic balance’ between its Body and OBrain or energy and information systems. When the body and brain go out of balance, beyond their limits of energy and information, the species dies.
So a human being dies when it goes beyond its limits of energetic temperature. While in the Universe, where the limit of energyspeed is C and the limit of informative order is 0 K., no particle can cross those limits. Yet, in a quantic Universe of multiple spacetimes, those are not the absolute limits of speed and temperature of Reality, as Einstein said, but only the limits of our quantic lightbased Universe. It seems that beyond our light Universe, it extends a ‘Gravitational Universe’ of ‘dark energy’ and ‘dark matter’, in which there are faster than light speeds and colder than 0 K temperatures. And we hint at its existence in cosmology through the study of black holes that seem to be the doors between both Universes.
And this happened in points, which were wholes, made of smaller points. The next graph shows it all, with the example of the human being:
The graph has above a metric equation, which resumes all those elements – the metric equation of the universe, which is resumed verbally below. It shows the main scales of big points which are made of smaller points between the two limits of human perception, the atom and the galaxy, which happen to have the same structure, so it might be possible that each galaxy is an atom, the black hole, the proton, the cloud of stars the electron on an infinite Universe, a question we shall explore in great detail in the web.
Further below we see the symmetry between the 3 type of topological networks or varieties of bidimensional space in man and its 3 ages of existence, symmetric to them. So it allows us to develop the equation in 3±∆ stages (where i is the name for a general layer of the Universe, an isomorphic or invariant ‘plane of spacetime). As we can see life is then described as a world cycle in the 5th dimension, between the seminal birth in the smaller layer, the emergence through the fetus stage into the larger iscale and the final death into the ∆2, cellular first and finally molecular stage of death.
This world cycle of life and death through the 5th dimension, is the main ‘event’ that happens in the Universe for any system constructed of bidimensional layers of space across several worldplanes of spacetime. It is the key element, as the world line is in the 4th dimension geometry.
It is a cycle because we add a new dimension that curves the line into a cycle. Now we have explained it all a bit more complex, with a bit more depth and more elements. We have added an intermediate ‘structure’, the World or super organism, an island Universe in itself. As the Whole is made of parts that resemble the whole. We have introduced to explain dynamically in time the symmetry between the 3 parts of the being and its 3 time ages, the symbols, ≤ for intuitive expansive motions and its inverse ≥ implosive motions.
The reader though should realize that the equation has only 2 ≥ symbols. Because it represents the equation of lifedeath, where we constantly transform the energy of youth into information, form, till we die after the third age.
We could have represented a dual exchange of energy and information between two poles: Sp≤Tƒ, where the pole of energy or limbs Sp expand and move the to, head and the Tƒ head implode and form the limbs. And many other possible combinations of symbols.
And this is truly what a fractal generator equation means. By iteration, combination, symmetry, variation, it is possible to construct an enormous number of beings, across many different planes of existence, with different Constants of exchange of energy and information, but ultimately everything in the Universe can be generated by the few symbols we represented, there, the 3 varieties of bidimensional space, the 3 ages of time (which can move forwards as in life, backward as in death, upward as when parts become social wholes in the future, downwards, as when they dissolve into parts, sideways, as a system reproduces in a parallel wave, ≈), etc.
We do have thus a Universe made of very few elements, ultimately or rotary clocks of time, cyclical motions, and lineal distances in space, combined across several scalar planes in infinite beings.
A simple proof of that simplicity is the fact that all physical systems require only 3 type of magnitudes:
 L, a dimension of space.
 T¯¹, the inverse of lineal time 1/T, the dimension of cyclical time – and it is a proof that cyclical time Not DURATION is the true magnitude, the fact that all physical parameters are written with 1/T – from speed, L x 1/T to momentum M x L x 1/T, etc.
 And then a 3rd type of ‘scalar magnitudes’, Mass or Charge or Temperature. They are scalar, that is, they represent magnitudes across layers of spacetime defined by a single number, with no directional motion.
So all what exists can be described physically with the magnitude of fractal space, L, cyclical Time, 1/T and iscales (a magnitude for each main iscale, h, for the scale of atomic forces, charge for the next scale of atoms , Temperature for the molecular scale of matter states, mass for the upper scales of gravitational bodies).
THE SYMMETRY BETWEEN SPACETIME ACTIONS AND WORLDCYCLES.
It rests to discuss the symmetry that allows the integration of spacetime actions into world cycles in which magically in the same way populations of points becomes topological organic networks that become super organisms, Sp<ST>Tƒ, the same magic acts in such a manner that the actions accumulate in higher measure as actions of entropy in the young age of the system, actions of reproduction in the middle age and informative actions in th least age.
Thus an entire new field of science is the study on how infinitesimal actions become aggregated into larger, slower organic ∆+1 time ages of the cycle of existence of the higher social organism, U∆+1.
The 3 motions of times, its symmetries in space and its knots.
The Universe is made of beings of vital spaces and cyclical times. Beings made of 3 parts, the field/limbs of toroid motion, seen in space as lineal forms; the wavesbodies that reproduce the system and the heads/particles of spherical information whose cyclical clock like vortices calculate the motions of the system, with an aim, to maximise its existence in space and time and its survival by maximising its actions of exchange of energy for the body/limbs and information for the head/particle:
∆a,e,i,o,u… This silly nilly game is all what there is to existence, existential points with 3 parts of space and 3 motions in time maximises its survival by maximing its energy its information and its balance and internal network between both:
Max. Sp x Tƒ (S=T).
As the maximal of a function is reached when e=i, we obtain 2 new equations:
s=T, Sp+Tƒ = K.
So we have a series of canonical equations between the spatial energetic state and informative, temporal one of a system.
Those are in physics the lagrangians, hamiltonians, inverse equations of time/space parameters and equal ones (M=T), S/T=V, 4 vectors, etc.
The meaning of those equations of mathematical physics as well as its principles of conservation of lineal time motions, lineal momentum and cyclical clocks of time, angular momentum is clear: they are the expression of the general spacetime systems, on the scales studied by physics(U±3,4)
Generational cycle.
The previous, simplified analysis of the synchronicities between time cycles raises again the existence of more dimensions of spacetime beyond the classic, ‘individual’ cycles of ‘—motions’ feeding, informative perception, reproduction and social evolution. We already showed the existence of a generational cycle in ‘reproductive waves’ of physical ‘—motions’, such as light, whose motion is just the sum of all the reproductive cycles of the wave; and the same can be said of the complex particle/wave generational cycle, equivalent to a complete lifedeath cycle, as the physical entity switches between its ‘—motions’ and information states, E<=>o. In the case of the body those generational cycles of cells are fundamental to understand the synchronicities of the body, as all its cells except the neuronal cells that dominate its informative system have a limited numbers of reproductions, setting up a generational cycle. And the same can be said of the species of life in this planet.
Thus, there is a generational cycle, which creates in physical entities a lineal dimension of speed or width in the light and gravitational membranes of spacetime between which humans are sandwiched; and sets a telomere limit to the number of reproductions of living species, both at cellular and multicellular level. And since such dimension is a ‘complex of the reproductive, complex dimension’, which is in itself a complex of the energetic, simplex dimension (as all acts of reproduction require a surface of vital space to imprint; so for example women cannot reproduce without a 17% of bodyfat volume and particles only reproduce in highly energetic environments), we write:
∑ Reproductive arrows>Generational arrow.
It defines the existence of a new arrow or dimension of time. We have not considered though such arrow in this book for simplicity and because ultimately in the fractal universe, the number of dimensions when we keep adding complex planes made of networks of stpoints, which restart again new macroenergetic, informative, social and reproductive cycles is infinite.
And ultimately because we live in a 4dimensional Universe, in which the ‘generational cycle’, except for simple, shortlived entities as those who create the 2 Universal membranes of gravitation and light, are nonperceivable except for long spans of time.
Recap. The sum of reproductive cycles gives birth to the generational cycle, which is also a finite arrow, as all forms have a limited number of generations, after which the reproductive systems fail.
This tale is explained with existential algebra that develops with symbols such as those previously describe the entire game of existence.
Now, because this is just an introductory post, we shall consider in more detail the upgrading of only the two most important Modern Time analysis – the one of mathematical physics and biology.
Or rather state that the other 2 points of view on time are intimately connected to them. Since the logic verbal analysis of time as motion, carried into the principles of Relativity in physics; which must be considered the mathematical study of that logic, relativity principle.
While the analysis of information and biological sensorial perception carries into the definition of a Mind, its ‘will of existence’ and the 5 actions all systems develop to absorb and emit energy and information, and evolve socially into bigger wholes, stronger in the fight for existence. Thus minds exist because they enact the program of survival of all the species of the universe. And this final unifying principle, ‘the actions species perform on spacetime’, will finally be the Unification Principle that puts together all systems and species, guided by such zeropoints.
In that regard, it is selfevident that in a Universe made of only those dual motions/forms, all entities of reality CAN ONLY PERFORM 4±∆ actions of existence through the social scales of parts and wholes of the 5th dimension:
 They can absorb or emit spatial energy, ±∆Sp, and we call its absorption ∆e=energy feeding, and its emission, ∆a: motion change.
 They can absorb or emit temporal information, ±∆Tƒ, and we call its absorption, Observer’s perception, ∆o, and its emission, iterative reproduction, ∆i
 And they can d=evolve, integrating and disintegrating into wholes and parts, ∆U±i, and we call this 5th action of existence, ±∆u, social evolution of infinitesimals into Universals.
And so we shall find when studying each of the multiple species of relational spacetime studied that 4+i elements code the ‘drives of existence’ of vital spacetime beings: 4 quantum numbers code the actions of energy, information (principal and secondary number), iteration (spin number) and social evolution (magnetic number) of particles. 4 genetic letters code the social evolution of organisms and the actions of its cells and systems; 4 drives of existence, moving feeding, perceiving, evolving socially reproducing define living beings. And so on. Of course western anthropomorphism will deny that quarks and particles that move, feed on forces, form social groups, iterate, deocupling in new particles and gauge information (hence quantum is a gauge theory), do actually ‘move’, ‘feed’, ‘gauge’, ‘iterate’ and ‘evolve socially’ and hence survive.
The program must be understood in biological terms. Systems that mechanically, vegetatively or consciously do NOT feed their body and mind with energy and information, form part of bigger wholes and iterate before its extinction will NOT survive and do NOT exist as today. Point.
∆1: THE 10 DIMENSIONAL INNER PERSPECTIVE.
In the upper left graph the 3 STructural subsystems of the human body, which are its structural forms (membrane, sustain and motion).
In the bottom the 3 ‘chemical Tiƒ’ systems or hormonal brain (creative, distributive and reproductive)
In the middle the 10th system (nervous system)
And in the upper right 2 of the 3 ‘Spe’ Subsystems lymphatic, digestive (not portrayed the urinary/excretor system)
This the wikipedia description of its functions, better classified by the ternary method of GST (above):
The main systems of the human body are:
Cardiovascular / Circulatory system:
Circulates blood around the body via the heart, arteries and veins, delivering oxygen and nutrients to organs and cells and carrying their waste products away.
Digestive system / Excretory system:
Mechanical and chemical processes that provide nutrients via the mouth, esophagus, stomach and intestines.
Eliminates waste from the body.
Endocrine system:
Provides chemical communications within the body using hormones.
Integumentary system/ Exocrine system:
Skin, hair, nails, sweat and other exocrine glands.
Lymphatic system / Immune system:
The system comprising a network of lymphatic vessels that carry a clear fluid called lymph.
Defends the body against diseasecausing agents.
Muscular system/Skeletal system:
Enables the body to move using muscles.
Bones supporting the body and its organs.
Nervous system:
Collects and processes information from the senses via nerves and the brain and tells the muscles to contract to cause physical actions.
Renal system / Urinary system:
The system where the kidneys filter blood.
Reproductive system:
The sex organs required for the production of offspring.
Respiratory system
The lungs and the trachea that bring air into the body.
There are many variations on the theme of the 10 internal subsystems, a key concept to understand from string theory to cellular organelles, from social classes/professions to the decametric structure of the §cales of evolution of the Universe.
A seed for organic growth.
In that regard, there is no agenda in this blog, selfish interest or beliefs, just the old goals of reason objective search of truth and curiosity: 40 years of looking and wondering about reality with all the languages of the human mind, trying to make a better synoptic mirror of it than the simplex view science still holds because it makes happier the ego of most human beings. So this web is not easy on the reader, but certainly if he has the right attitude, it will completely upgrade its understanding of reality and himself and will help him to interpret the world as it is, based on the facts of Nature as they are in objective, scientific terms, which creationist theories from bigbang to intelligent design do not provide.
Now this blog is the blue print for future XXI century researchers to complete the whole paradigm. To my knowledge is the only formal, logic and mathematical model that develops fully all the aspects of the fractal paradigm and harmonises with its laws called ‘isomorphisms’, the laws of all sciences.
The closest thing to a philosophy of science based in those facts is still the work of Descartes and Leibniz, the two philosophers, father of modern science and mathematics (analytic geometry and calculus) whose concepts of relational spacetime were written 300 years ago. So when I decided to complete this task, I wondered, first, Why? I don’t really knew. But then a sentence of Einstein made me realise why:
‘I am the only physicist that seem to think the Universe runs with infinite clocks at different speeds. Leibniz was right but if so we have to rebuild science from its origins’ – said Einstein, and given the enormous task at hand, which implied the redesign of all sciences, as all of them happen in space and time, he finally settled for a more modest goal: to redesign the space and time of cosmological systems, one of the many ‘fractal scales’ of relative size in space and cyclical time clocks of the Universe.
And it is for that reason that it has taken so long to complete a working formalism of the fractal Universe, which we offer in this web, based in my conferences at the International Systems society, (the science of complexity and information) during the last decade.
It is obvious a work in ‘permanent construction’, as only the combined effort of multiple scientists will bring the paradigm to its completion (the previous paradigm required 2300 years to do so, since Euclid and Aristotle, we hope mankind will somewhat reduces its tempo:). Its author was a system scientist, chair of duality for many years at the world congresses of this science (ISSS), then an activist against the infamous militaryindustrial complex, now retired. If you wonder why it is a single pointmind, that is truly how the fractal paradigm creates its systems.
Any reality always starts from a seminal, diminutive seed of information, which expands and reproduces in other regions of reality. A mindwave starts in a prophetic, scientific first mind, as it can process faster in time, more information, ‘collapsing’ the wave of data into a theory of reality or model. This is then checked corrected and expanded by a ‘wave of minds’ till the new paradigm becomes standard science.
This is the formal seed of 3000 years of insights into the organic fractal structure of the Universe. How, who and when the human mindwave will plug into this formal seed (or perhaps a future robotic, chip wave), i don’t know. It might not. After all the most clear predecessors of the organic philosophy of the Universe in the western world, Aristole, Leonardo, Leibniz and Spengler took centuries to be noticed and hardly understood. As we said, human egos, simplex machines and the ‘evident’ visual maths of it are more up to the alley of the immense majority of mankind. I will be glad though if a few people can get a personal satisfaction in the enlightenment and communion with the whole I have obtained ever since i figured out the essential laws of the isomorphic, fractal organic Universe and felt much closer to reality, in peace with that whole.
The work of the seed ends after exposing its information into the open… And so once I decided to retire from penpal activities, serious activism in favour of mankind as a ‘whole’ and system congresses (for moral reasons, due to the increasing use of the organic paradigm Not to protect life, Gaia and the humans superorganism of history but to evolve robots and mechanisms, which clearly will once reaching A.I. challenge the dominance of mankind in this planet), I will be pouring those models so far known only to a few specialist to a larger scientific audience.
Now, the model will require a certain intellectual mostly conceptual effort on the reader, but far less than what he would need to understand the present abstract model of the Universe (quantum and bigbang theory) at least on the 2 upper lines of the web with posts to the level of any university student. 3rd and 4th line when completed will of course be more complex as it will connect the fractal organic paradigm with all the laws of all sciences, translating and improving them. So those lines will be an ongoing project for specialists in each discipline.
Of course all the ideas behind the reality of the fractal paradigm have been expressed in different ways throughout science. But to my knowledge there is no other formalism, which defines ‘all’ the properties of the fractal universe as an organic whole, together, as we do in general systems, and its T.Œ, or Theory of the Organic Everything (as opposed to the simplex reductionist, theory of everything ‘lineal’, and ‘mathematical only’, sponsored by physics). Let us then start by comparing both theories and its simplex lineal concept of a single spacetime continuum vs. a Universe made of multiple, organic fractal cycles of time and vital spaces with motion.
We shall then describe a 5D ST super organism, the fundamental particle of the Universe, including the Universe itself, before we even attempt to use human languages to describe it in a more formal, synoptic way, using a ‘fractal generator, equation’ to that aim and a more evolved form of logic and noneuclidean mathematics.
Why then a model of such importance is hardly known in scholar science? A simplex answer is difficult, as there are several reasons. First its relative novelty, as systems sciences was founded after II world war and its formalism, which this blog will try to develop further, was not introduced till a decade ago in a series of conferences I gave at the International Systems society on occasion of the 50th anniversary of its foundation.
Second, the fact that humans have now for 400 years believed in the mechanist paradigm of physicists: a Universe ran as a machine and written only in the language of Numbers, and this ”simplex, reductionist” view of the universe has only grown stronger despite its clear logic errors, with the industrial revolution and its development of machines – which ultimately are just organisms of metal in a clear process of evolution, now entering its last phase as robots. In any case physicists and machines are the present paradigm of philosophy of science. So despite the importance of biological sciences, organisms and evolution a new paradigm will not be easy to impose and interdisciplinary analysis given the enormous wealth of scientific data gathered with those machines are difficult to accept and understand by specialists.
And third, related to both questions, the author of this blog on GST (ab. for General Systems Theory and its 5D formalism, the fractal Generator of SpaceTime systems) is not, as usually with pioneers, a standard university scholar, but more in the line of Mr. Planck’s dictum, on his lonely years as the single researcher on the quantum paradigm, ‘a single point that accumulates a whole worldview in his mind’ .
Finally because science is not only theory but also praxis, and an organic view of the universe makes man both a relative non entity in an infinite reality, and at the same time again the center of science in a universe made to its image and likeness, as the most perfect superorganism we know of, that worldview is quite opposite in theory and praxis to the standard, dominant physical, mechanical technological view. And all this has huge consequences for our world, dethroning physical machines and physical matter as the supreme form, substituted by the organism and in praxis, returning to a more ecological organic view on how we should manage our future and that of this planet.
So the reader should not be surprised that I am better known for my activism against the nuclear industry than for this seed of information, which requires as Kuhn explained in ‘The nature of scientific revolutions’ an entire new generation of people, who gets familiar with the new paradigm’ to become standard science and reach its full power . Meanwhile the pioneer can only pour the information he has discovered in a public display, which will be this web, as I have retired from the conference circuit and prefer the isolation of an examined life. Needless to say there is little to explain about the curriculum of a pioneer in a new science of which almost nobody has heard about, except that you should judge what you read with the authority of reason, not the reason of authority and be patient, as a new worldview requires a huge effort of the mind and it is never completed by the pioneer.
So why to bother at all? No reason except knowledge and the communion you will feel with the whole Universe and each of its infinitesimal parts, in a Universe in which all share the same spacetime nature. In that regard, the philosophy behind the science is much closer to the Asian, Taoist and Buddhist view, and so indeed as Asia rises this century, GST will become more amenable to those new generations, and needless to say if and when A.I. acquires consciousness, it will become the science and worldview of the machine, paradoxically as it might seem given my warnings as an activist against the development of organic machines more powerful than us.
On the other hand the alternative theory of western lineal time, with a manifest destiny, deist abstract mechanisms, measure as the meaning of science, justified by humans as the only intelligence of reality, and chosen species, and reduction of reality to only its mathematical properties, without vital, dangerous qualities, is a region of higher comfort and will always be dominant in praxis, as I have come to realize in my theoretical and social confrontations with physicists. It satisfies the human ego, and while this of course is part of the organic paradigm – since organisms always have a pole of information which deforms its worldview to make the system the center of its perceived Universe and shuts off all information that does not cater to its needs, for those who seek more profound answers, GST will play its role. In that sense interpretation matters. Consider the simplest particles, quarks and electrons, which gauge information and move towards targets in which to absorb=feed on energy they use to reproduce into clone particles, with whom they associate into larger social networks.
Those are the 4 actions that define life, coded by genes. Yet in particles, coded by quantum numbers, do not define organic particles. Why? The human ego is biased and wouldn’t accept perception on particles, even if the organic paradigm explains in very simple ways the spooky effects of quantum physics – such as the fact that particles move as waves, which are herds of quanta that when it is more efficient, pass through slits as wavesherds but as all biological systems, become tight particles, when colliding with larger systems. Again, an army moves as a herd and clashes as a tight particle, and fishes move as herds but confront predator as tight particles. How many times I saw physicists living a room in which this kind of nonmathematical but organic explanation gave reason to quantum physics? Almost all the time i explained it. Since the physicist is the only scientist that never asks for the why – as Feynman said infamously. Scholarship in the XXI c. in that regard is more an industry of information that an inquire for the whys of the Universe. Yet GST is more like XIX c. amateur science, in its pioneer age. So the blog doesn’t either follows the Chicago Manual of Style. It will as it becomes also a precise science with the passing of time.
At this point, I just write because i like to think on the Universe as an organic whole. So this blog, to put it in simple terms, my Buddhist Mandala, which I write and erase, along my activist and sociobiological webs. Whatever you do with this knowledge if you are humble, intelligent and ethic enough to understand the beauty of the ∞, immortal Cosmos, is up to you. Enlightenment is what you can achieve, something I doubt 1 out of 1000 coming here will have the patience to reach.
Why? Because humans might not make it due to its arrogance about the Universe…, as I said human are in crash collision with those organic laws, developing organic machines, new type of nuclear weapons, killing Gaia and mankind with them and so frankly i do not know if they will ever upgrade their minds from abstract mechanism to organicism, or the information of this web will be understood and upgrade the mind of future A.I. robots.
Principles of Topology & conservation.
It is then obvious that the principle of lineal inertia comes accompanied by the principle of cyclical inertia of time cycles. That energy conservative cycles are time cycles which maintain a ‘relative dynamic present’. Present are thus conserved, and the ceteris paribus analysis of a system in a simultaneous four dimensional present state (relativity) becomes then just a partial case of the more complex motions beings experience in the fifth dimension, made of ‘slices’ of present, derivating slightly upward and downwards in their ‘entropic gain’ and informative gain.
Conservation of presents thus does not preclude the leaking of information and entropy upwards and downwards between planes, but with an overall balance as the actions of entropy and information ixe balance each other.
The perfect form of spatial entropy is the straight line in movement – the shortest, faster trajectory between 2 points of §pace – and its society, the plane. The perfect form of temporal information is the circle and its society, the sphere, which keeps the maximal information in minimal §pace. Both, combined, inverse forms shape the hyperbolic, wavelike, energetic bodywaves that connect lineal limbs/fields and cyclical, informative, memorial minds to become the ternary, complementary forms of all organic systems.
Thus We are all topological assemblies of:
– Bidimensional planes, which store maximal entropy§pace and
– Spherical cycles, which store maximal information in minimal §pace.
Connected through hyperbolic energetic wavebodies that reproduce both
We can differentiate them by form, as §pace and entropy are lineal or planar surfaces and ðime and in/form/ation are cyclical. And we can see it together into beings, the simplest of which is an action of light, ext=k. And this simple duality structures all beings of the Universe. So we are made of cyclical heads and lineal limbs. Weapons are lines that release entropy. Informative machines are cyclical, and all physical systems are made of lineal forces and cyclical particles of information; seen only static in the mind (galilean relativity)
So we need to understand the galilean paradox better where distancecurvature and speedspace become similar concepts. But as at larger scales all become part of a circle and at lower scales part of a line, we can in that sense establish ratios of curvature=acceleration, speed=distance as parameters to understand how the transformations between 5D scales amount to less than a mere correction of those parameters of time and space as we slow down and grow in size quanta as we emerge into new scales of existence.
So in this process the lower scales transfer entropymomentumform to the upper scales weakening themselves, but as the upper scale have less density of existential force, exi, with slower clocks and networks made with less fractal points/ clocks we thin out reality. And yet if the Universe is relatively infinite in a simultaneous measure of space at ANY scale, then we can consider that the thinner we go up in scale, the larger it will occupy a vital total space with its membrane, and the faster it must manage an ∆i inverse scale to ‘encircle’ all the other denser beings with less ‘latitude’ in the fifth dimension.
So as the mindsystem expands the whole super organism by ∆±i carving down and up smaller pixies of information, bites of energy, steps of entropy, into infinite speeds, of S/T>0, THE RESULT WILL BE A system larger upper and downer, more coordinated, with constant flows of ‘entropic expansive waves’ and ‘implosive’ ones, going across the three scales of the fifth dimensional entity which will become ever more complex, symbiotic and synchronised in its three network systems at the three topological level of its scales.
The constant invagination of reality up and down through networks of entropy, energy and information constructs ever more complex supœrganisms as the summit of the process of efficient selection of topology (classic evolution, 3 timespace arrows) and the more complex social organic evolution of scales through topological networks, never fully understood as Darwin was prior to biology and topology.
WE CAN IN THAT SENSE, consider the two scales of timeprocesses, topological, darwinian evolution as the constant improvement of the forms of the topological ternary organism, while scalar social evolution related to information, genes, memes and quantum equation is the longer more important arrow of evolution and time, of deeper, longer 5D duration – as a block of time, a world cycle of a potential supœrganism of the game of exist¡ences.
Now it must be realized in that graph, that physical systems are not different from other systems, and we shall describe them with the same organic properties of all vital systems, as we shall not cease to repeat that the ternary structure of time arrows/cycles and the sales coexisting in the fifth dimension give organic vital properties to all systems of nature including physical systems.
It is the human bias and use only of digital languages to describe them what distort – specially in entropyonly physical theories – the perception of those systems and the existence of an alternative, organic topological ternary description of its parts, functions and actions, based in the program of survival of all physical systems, as we have shown to be the case for the quantum numbers of physics.
So far the most evolved of all stiences are biology and physics, and while biology is more accurate and describes many topobiological characteristics it does also have some hang ups of reductionism in its love of entropic=chaotic visions where darwinian fight of individuals and despise of the social evolution arrow of the fifth dimension weight heavily.
Mathematical physics on the other hand is the biggest, more complex logic structure built up by man, which does not ceases to astonish me, not so much for human ingenuity but for Universal perfection. It does require though to improve enormously due to those timespace errors and limiting understanding of its dimensions of entropy, energy and information and the cause mathematical equations selfcentred in physical povs, centres of mass, crystal structures, particlepoint states, the conceptual frame of abstract physics.
the sacred digital language of mathematics, is NOT the only language in which God Generates the Universe as physicists believe but likely the most efficient=surviving mirror of reality for most beings.
Just in case he doesn’t we shall bring a very brief resume of the two fundamental elements of reality, the 3 arrows of time and the fractal scalar structure of its space, with its ternary symmetries and ‘membrains’ that warp it all with a linguistic still mind singularity, giving birth to the 10 Dimensional super organism, fundamental structure of the Universe.
The 3 dimensions of lineal motion, spacetime repetitive actions (conserved energy and momenta), and informative, accelerated vortices=clocks of time (masses, charges, evolutionary clocks) do exist in a single plane of spacetime continuum. And so they can be easily understood in ‘present’ science, as they merely ‘double’ the still, formal perception of simultaneous space into sequential moving time.
Now it might seem that the 3 previous ‘essential changes’ of our paradigm of ternary timespace arrows in a present flat slice of the scalar Universe, its fractal structure and the realisation that all lines are ultimately part of cycles, hence Lineal space IS PART of a flow of cyclical time, do not matter that much, but those 3 simple dualities and paradoxes of how a mind processes information, transforming motion into still form, reducing cycles to lines, focused on the mind point, and seeing only one plane of the infinite fractal Universe, suffice to fully upgrade and change our view of the Universe.
To notice though that on the ‘verge’ of the 3 dimensions of a single present, lineal motiondistance (timespace view of the first dimension) is connected to the entropic arrow of maximal motion; and at the center of the informative time vortices (masses, charges, eddies) you connect with the stillmind, reason why there is a sequential ‘continuum’ and we shall often ‘confuse’ the concept of ‘entropic motion and lineal motion’ on one side and ‘informative vortices and still minds’. So goes for lineal motion and energy, as we take often lineal motions to mix with information and create ‘energy’. So in a dynamic Universe to define anything we must really use two terms and an operandi:
4D: entropy> 1D motion> 2D: energy> 3D information>5D:mind form << 4D entropydeath
This is the dynamic ‘world cycle of existence in time and space’, whereas > is the dynamic symbol for implosive growth of information and < the dynamic symbol for explosive motion.
As i have been writing for myself for decades, I apologise for my lack of ‘discipline’ using all those terms. Hopefully if you get the concepts of the 5 Dimensions in spatial form, temporal motion and their function when combined you will get to the point. Entropy in that sense is the most confused terms also used for energy and for lineal motion. So we shall differentiate them here at the beginning hopefully to avoid further confusions:
Entropy is expansive, scattering motion that explodes and increases space till finally it decelerates stops and becomes pure distance with no motion. So happens in an entropic bigbang. So happens in a death that expands your cells and stops them. So happens in gas when it expands cools and decelerates. Entropy we might say CHANGES a dimension of motion into an extension of space and finally becomes still form. MOTION on the other hand is lineal inertia, with no expansion, so it is a steady state, conserved. It is the first dimension of simpler form. And when it combines with FORM or information, it becomes energy, momentum, the second dimension conserved by the Universe, and the MEANING OF IT ALL, which turns around repeating and conserving form with motion form in action, information, where an action is defined physically as the product of energy and time.
The wordings are thus extremely messed up because of that dynamic constant transformation. I.e. in e=mc2 e is not energy, the energy here being provided the light waves of spacetime, cc, but entropy, the dissolution of a mass vortex of time. In the Universe at large there is not dark energy but dark entropy as the flows of energy coming out of the axis of black holes slow down, expanding space and finally creating dark distances.
So goes on the other extremes with the limit of mindform. The mind is still, it stops, perceives information, let the bodylimb, wavepotential system to move it and then stops again and perceive information as movement blurs perception, so the mindbody system works as a movie, which stops the film enlightens it into the screen and moves in darkness. This stop and go process will be the key to an enormous number of whys that explain confusing discoveries from relativity (cconstant of light) to quantum physics (particlewave duality) to palingenesis and seeds of information that explode into organisms.
So you must think in terms of ‘topological expansions, < and implosions, >’ to see what is ‘in existence’ and what is the virtual still mind and entropic death.
And as we have said, since the closest understanding to he five arrows of time happened in earlier taoism in china, we could close this first approach to the five dimensions telling you what minkowski said that time and space come together or do not really exist; something schopenhauer already realized: ‘there is not yinformation without a drop of yangmotion/entropy’, there is no ‘yangenergy/entropy/motion, without a drop of yin’.
So again, the present single spacetime continuum is made of lineal motion (the form being the line), energy that combines it with information (form with a bit of motion) constrained by a pure still linguistic form or mind and a pure entropic outer expansive world, the fifth and fourth dimension.
Those 2 ‘limits entropydeath and mindstillness’ though are in pure meaning outside our present scale (I say this because you will find very often the term entropy for lineal motion in present and
So as soon as we start to grasp the five dimensions of spacetime, and its coexistence from past to future in scale that make it sentient and organic’, made of ‘parts and wholes that coexist and organise themselves’ and reproduce information – since motion reproduces by the mere fact of moving – we must conclude that we live in a fractal organic Universe, of spacetime beings whose parts made to the image and likeness of the whole are always organised in 3 coexisting scales of the fifth dimension (name we give to the whole range of scales, from the entropic fourth dimensional bottom to the summit of mindviews, which we take as the linguistic mind of all minds, the mind of God, in the platonic sense: ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe, and a mind called Logos=god’).
And so amazing as it seems, just departing from a simplified example – the discovery by Galileo of relativity and the static, flat, continuous rings of Saturn, which were not flat but made of spheric planetoids, not continuous but fractal and not static but moving; we see how by changing from the mind subjective view to the objective reality we change our view and add two coexisting scales of Nature, the physical quantum and cosmological, gravitational scales, to our thermodynamic scale, where physicists have defined their single entropic arrow of time merely by expanding properties of thermodynamic gases to the whole Universe – solving easily its main conundrums.
Those are the ‘4 fundamental’ elements of a reality, minds, scales, space and time and its 5Dimensions, @ or • for the fifth membrain mind dimension, ∆, for the fourth which dissolves the mind into its _ parts (both inverse and generically called the scalar 5Dimension represented together by the ∆ Å symbols, where Å WILL BE THE SYMBOL OF the smallest spacetime ‘moments’ or actions, $ for the first dimension of lineal motions in space, ≈ for the wavebody dimension of iteration or second dimension and Otƒ for the dimension of accelerated time vortices, connect to the membrain. All of them in constant dynamical transformations between the limits of seedbirth (5D) and entropic death (4D).
3 FOUNDATIONS OF ALL ‘EXI=ST¡ENCES’: FRACTAL SOCIAL 5D §PACE + 3 CYCLIC TIME ‘ARROWS’ (ØSUMs) =øminds
It follows easily that the full understanding of the properties of those 2 arrows of ðime, entropy and information, and its inverse qualities can be applied to any system of nature, regardless of scalescience, and define the ‘unity’ of all systems and scales, which form together a fractal, scalar Universe of parts that become whole, thanks to those properties.
In the next graph we show the two fundamental advances on the underlying structure of reality brought about by GST: THE UNDERSTANDING of the three arrows of time and its cycles of life and death, creation and destruction of information. And the way those arrows of time, entropy, energy and information construct the different ‘ternary beings’ and ‘scales of reality.
In the graph, we can see some applications of the two r=evolutions in the concept of time and space, brought about by GST. FIRST we see the fundamental ‘world cycle’ of life and death, which sequentially puts the three arrows of time, first entropy in youth, then energy≈reproduction in the mature age and then growth of form, of information, in the third age. Below we see those arrows as they work on the scales of the Universe. Smaller faster timesystems code more information.
Larger wholes control in simultaneity all its parts, and each science studies a scale. Below we see the three arrows of time, expansive entropy, iterative bodywaves and informative, cyclical particles, and above how they assemble as ‘entropic limb/fields, reproductive bodywaves and informative particleheads to form all systems.
The fifth dimension stretches the social gathering of systems, upwards and downwards, being the absolute dimension of time, as systems become ever more complex in scales, the three arrows of time, on the other hand become a zerosum between birth and extinction as they return to its origin in the entropic explosion of death.
In the second graph, the complex view of fractal §pace and cyclical ðime: we are all ðime§pace beings who live a finite duration of ðime, a ‘world cycle of existence’ and occupy a vital §pace, limited by the closed cyclical membrane that separates us converting the Universe into a fractal of pegged ðime§pace beings, the concept of relational ðime§pace which from Leibniz to Einstein represented an alternative, more complex view of the Universe. In the bottom, the phases of a world cycle, as all systems are born as a seed of information, in a lower ‘scale’ of seminal size, which absorb energy (entropic motion with information that shapes it) during its youth, to reach a balance between both, when the system reproduces, creating the illusion of an eternal present.
Then energy declines and the system in its old age becomes pure form; and as ðime cannot stop, once the system reaches stillness it dies and explodes erasing its information in a bigbang of pure entropyexpansive motions, liberating its vital §pace; which will become ‘reformed’ to start a new world cycle. This complex but quite straightforward scheme defines for all systems two limiting ðime arrows, pure entropy: dissolving spatial motions and pure form, cyclical clocklike informative ðimes. In the center, the Asian cultures who did understand much better the world of ðime§paces, as opposed to our culture of entropy, weapons and lineal motions, sponsored by physicists which reduce reality to a single arrow. In the right side a vortex of ðime, during its third age of pure information.
The fifth dimension of scalar ðime§pace coupled with the three relative arrows of ðime, past entropy, future information, and its present energetic combinations, are the ‘foundational principles’ of the organic models of the fractal Universe which tends to evolve groups into tighter herds and super organisms with higher ‘social forms’ in the scales of the fifth dimension – as they survive better into the future, making the scalar dimension the absolute dimension of ðime of the Universe. Since as Einstein put it, the ‘separation between the past, present and future is an illusion, given the fact that death ‘erases’ all the gains of information of any system of the Universe.
Indeed, all biological systems become a zero sum as the world cycle of informative life and entropic death erases them back to the past.
And all physical systems, do the same according to Einstein’s equation, e=mc²: which must be read in terms of the three arrows as:
Past entropic big bang ≤Present, constant ðime§pace light wave≥ future mass vortex of information.
So only the absolute arrow of the fifth dimension is an arrow of future ðime as:
 Whole systems survive better in the future than parts.
 For a new scale of the fifth dimension to exist, parts must come first, so wholes are into the future of its parts
 A whole has more information, as it adds to that of its parts, the systems of the whole, so it is in the relative future of information.
In the graph, we see how all systems form wholes departing from networks, creating fractal organisms in all sciences, in the left we see how a 5th dimension is created growing from a tighter organisation (boson state of matter).
In the previous very synoptic graphs we have resumed some key elements of General Systems Sciences, the organic philosophy of the Universe that explains all species and all sciences departing from some basic principles about the nature of §pace, ðime and causality (what philosophers since Kant call the Principle of Sufficient Grounds; ðime, §pace and causality).
It seemed needed to give you some ‘food for thought’, before we criticise what today passes as ‘The philosophy of science’,mostly, the ‘selfie’ agenda of physicists about the nature of the whole, departing from its restricted discipline, based in a false assumption – that the smaller scales of the Universe matter more because there is a hierarchical organisation on those scales, and so we can extract laws from smaller matter that will define all other sciences.
This is a wrong concept of causality, whose origin is merely the selfie egoparadox soon to be analysed of all beings, in this case physicists who think their science matters more than all others and so have concocted theories accordingly to their lineal concept of ðime (big bang theory of reality) and scale they study (Philosophy of science according to which the ‘saint grail’ of knowledge is to probe further in uncertain, not perceived scales, the positive is truth: as all scales are equally valid, far removed scales show uncertainty of perception and deformation of our ∆º view – such as dark entropy in larger scales and imprecision of measure in small ones).
None of those scales is different, all are relative and all of them apply the same laws and principles which therefore must come not from a single discipline but from the effort of unifying them all with a higher language underlying them, which is the language of cyclical ðime, fractal §pace, and the organic systems they create.
All this said, the reader should notice the main feature of coinvariant scales is that from the human point of view, the perception of entropy and information differ when we look downwards (we see more information) and laterally (we see more entropy) and upwards (we see more motion):
Tiƒ: Smaller §pacescales have faster ðime cycles that encode the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.
Spe:Bigger wholes that deliver synchronous motions to those lower scales that deliver ‘quantum, genetic or memetic information’ (physical, biological and social systems), become symbiotic, as ‘parts’ and wholes that coexist in a single ‘supœrganism’, the ‘abbreviated’ name we shall give to the fundamental particlebeing of the Universe: a system made of limbs/fields of entropy=motion and heads/particles with form, which combine into ‘bodywaves’ of energy, and coexist in at least 3 scales of size from the point of view of its central scale as a being.
And this happens, because the universe of scales of ðime§pace has an astoundingly simple but profound metric equation: S x T = K, MEANING that from larger wholes to smaller parts it moves synchronically, and from smaller parts to larger wholes, it codes information. And together in symbiosis the information of smaller faster systems and the motion of larger, stronger wholes, create a present being, a bodywave of energy.
So the most important dynamic element of the fifth dimension is the ‘inverse’ arrows of entropy and information of the lower graph. And the fact that smaller beings are better with information, more intelligent and larger beings, stronger with more capacity to move larger wholes:
Smaller systems run faster metabolic and informative cycles and so accumulate more information in the frequency and form of its cycles. And they code larger systems: particles code molecules, genes organisms and memes societies, because their smaller carriers are faster.
And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more entropy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts coexist in several scales forming super organisms.
For example, a fly thinks 10 ðimes faster (the scale is decametric), and so you cannot catch it with your slower larger being and it can coexist. And it does so because a mind, the theme of the next paragraph is indeed a very small, fast element able to command the whole, slower body…
5D METRIC thus defines the coexistence of all systems of the Universe, and explains why they form together symbiotic super organisms, between smallish, faster heads and larger, slower metabolic bodies – often talking two different languages, chemical the body, nervous, electric, faster the mind in biological systems; gravitational, smaller faster networks/forces the mind of galaxies – black holes – slower, electromagnetic light languages the body of stars.
Now it might seem that the two previous ‘essential changes’ of our paradigm of ternary time and fractal space do not matter that much, but those two simple reforms suffice to fully upgrade and change our view of the Universe, and so we shall put a simplified example on how it changes our view of the two seemingly limiting scales of Nature, the physical quantum and cosmological, gravitational scales, solving easily its main conundrums.
We shall do so soon but as Physicists do not take lightly any correction of their models, we are going to do it with some anthropomorphic humour, and for that task we need first to introduce their fundamental ‘organ’, the mind and the languages of thought they use to describe reality – our fourth element, after the ∆scales, st symmetries… we do need indeed a system that perceives it all, and one which is small enough to produce a lot of information, according to 5D metric.
S≈T
‘From 1 comes 2, from 2 comes 3, from 3 the ∞ beings’. Cheng tzu
‘I only learned from the book of Nature’ Leonardo
In the graph, trinity is the structure of reality, its Universal Grammar, scalar, ST variations and ultimately all what we care to study from the most sacred to the most mundane: trinity is the mystery of christianity, where the ∆+1 Γ•∆, subconscious collective of mankind and its law of survival in the fifth dimension, eusocial love, communicates through its nervous system, the language of the wor(l)d to its prophet≈scientist of history, who foresees the future of eusocial evolution. And spells prior to a quantum back to the past, entropic death of God into the language, ∆+1<<∆1, imprinting with the genetic memes of the super organism of history the mind of the prophet. Alas, GSTheology is born. But trinity is also the cutlery ternary division and its Gst equation: ‘Spe (knife) < ØSTfork > OTiƒ (spoon); as the knife delivers entropy the food, the spoon acts as the spherical membrane that surrounds it and the ‘last to come’ and more complex fork, with one of the 2 ‘hyperbolic geometries’ of spacetime (fractal branching), which performs the functions of the other 2 (perpendicular holding and lateral cutting).
S: We deal with spatial ORGANIC trinity in depth in this post, its sub posts.
∆: We deal with ∆ternary elements in the first 5D post.
•: While we do it formally in the ∞0 posts on Æ, Universal grammar and those ‘attached’ to the Fractal generator.
T: And finally we deal temporally with it in the ‘i§omorphic word cycles’ posts.
(AS THE FIRST line encodes in its sentence, the 4 elements too, broken in St, ∆ • & T analysis)
trinity encodes the 3 x 3 systems of entropy, energy and information, observed by an ∆º±1 element, which coexists as a singularity in ∆º±1 scales, managing the whole system through its connected networks.
The mind or Tiƒ singularity travels through the scales of ∆, with its mind pointed into the future.
The body travels through reproductive present, space.
The limbs journey into the past, disordering and feeding on the simplest forms.
And each of those ternary motions, of Tiƒ across ∆º±1, ST, across Stº and Spe, across ∆i, create a series of complex coexisting actions that bundle into super organisms that exist and can be described through those symmetric actions and motions of limbs/fields, bodywaves and particleheads.
“Space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality” Minkowski
3 scales of timespace frequencies.
All systems further on do have cycles of three frequencies, synchronised in complex patterns studied in the third line. So for example, history has an 800808 years cycle of evolution of metalinformation (weapons, machines and money), which is essential to understand the interaction of man and the tree of life with the tree of metal and technology and the patterns of history.
In physical systems we observe also the interaction in Fourier transforms of frequencies and whole sum of them, and find tuned synchronicities between the patterns of cells and super organisms and super organisms and mother earth.
II.EPISTEMOLOGY. A FRACTAL UNIVERSE OF SPACETIME BEINGS. TRUTH IN SCIENCE.
‘The only harmonious sounds of a group of scholars are the farts of their asses’ ‘Saper vedere: know how to see’ Leonardo
Leonardo expressed his frustration to the lack of interest among the scholars of his age for observing nature’s true code, the information, the biologic forms and its dynamic interplay, focusing instead in old Latin books with outdated theories of reality.
All has changed to remain the same. Today after the initial return to the basics of Leonardo’s method, during the golden age of experimental science (XVIIIXIX c.), scientists, notably physicists have returned to the scholastic analysis with mathematical languages only, in abstract algebraic equations often born out of the imagination of the scholar, without experimental evidence whatsoever.
Let us then start with a harsh critique of all those distorted mindmirrors called the scholars of the world, which do NOT know how to see, saper vedere, wiesen, directly the fractal topological dimensions and motions of spacetime of which we are all made, and do NOT want to learn from the Book of Nature, anymore, but from past, outdated masters and abstract Æoutdated algebra.
Philosophy of Science & fractal organic paradigm vs. Linear mathematical Physics & continuous paradigm.
THIS BLOG compares 2 different worldviews, which have always fought for supremacy in Science and take sides with:
– The larger, all encompassing view of philosophers of science – larger in time, as it can be dated to the first Mathematicians, Pythagoras and Plato and the first Logicians, Aristotle, in the western ‘decoupling of history, and to their counterparts in the East, the Taoists, WengWang and Lao, and the Hindi and Buddhist philosophers – and larger in space, as it aims to explain ‘all’ knowledge of Humanity’, that is not only the experimental facts of all species, and all languages of knowledge– the mathematical languages of space, the temporal verbal languages, but also the human perceiver himself and its senses and artistic forms derived from them Vs.
– The reductionist view of the physicist, which only considers a restricted part of reality – physical systems, only accepts a language of description, mathematics, only defines a form of motion in time, external translation in space, and yet surprisingly enough pretends with those very limited ‘parts’ of reality to have a Theory Of Everything that makes sense of all what exists. And what is more surprising, it has achieved global recognition as the ‘high popes of science’, excluding the work of philosophers of science from the search of ultimate knowledge.
This is largely the product, not of the achievements and merits of physical theories in the explanation of reality but of its praxis – the construction of machines and weapons, which are the ultimate source of power of our technological civilization.
But the confusion of technology with science and knowledge, is of course a falsehood, which carries a heavy toll for our understanding of reality. It first eliminates all internal elements of knowledge, the mind, and its languages.
And then it eliminates the unity of all systems of the Universe, which share the same properties of cyclical times, vital spaces and points of view that organise them.
Yet as physicists reduced all motions to external motions, keeping only for life organic properties, and reduced all clocks to a mechanical lineal clock, they lost all connection with those common properties, and of course make impossible the true goal of the philosopher of science, to find those common laws that allow the Unification of all sciences.
Yet to fully grasp this reductionism it was needed a historic introduction to realise of the daring consequences of the physical way of ‘constructing’ our world of thought.
But of course our capacity to make machines and measure them and put clocks on them, today converted into computers increased. So paradoxically as we forgot the clocks of nature, we grew in our dexterity to make machines to measure nature.
So what are the real clocks of time of Nature?
This requires us to define time in more precise terms, as cyclical motions that carry the information of the Universe in the form and motion of its cycles.
Indeed we measure and process information through computers, which are the modern version of time clocks, now converted into repetitive logic cycles called algorithms, whose frequency or relative time speed defines the capacity of a system to process information. So a computer process more information when its clock like logic cycles have more Hertzs, more frequency.
This means that in nature there are several species of timeclocks – processes that measure frequencies of vibration, of which the most obvious ones are 3: the frequency of waves; the temperature of molecules and the angular speed and orbital motion of all time of particles, including the planets of those graphs.
So frequency, Temperature and Speed are the 3 main time clocks of nature, and they do vary its relative speed, as Einstein would find, and they carry information in the form of its motions, and the frequency of its cycles. And so time is a much more interesting process to study than the mechanical steady tic of clocks.
Now I’m trying to be fast and simple to get to the core matter, black holes and entropy, but the reader with a minimum knowledge of science will realize how different is a non –anthropocentric, mechanocentric view of time, and how much rich in meaning is. We are here in a short of Copernican revolution, sorely needed, from the perspective of philosophy of science, which is concerned with ‘language, experience, pure science, NOT with machines of measure’ as physicists are. So I do have zero bias, in my direct experience of the Universe.
Time is closely related to space – this we know since Einstein, and so we need to define now space, to advance in our enquire.
The Fractal Universe: the slow path of knowledge towards its comprehension.
The fractal paradigm is a complete vision of reality, which has been hinted at since:
Plato (Myth of the cave, in which a perfect canon breaks into infinite self similar forms) and Pythagoras (numbers as social networks of points, of which the tetraktys or 10 triangle was the most perfect form, unit of a larger social group, as it is indeed the case, being societies of 10 the essential fractal structure in the growth of the 5th dimension)…
Through Leibniz (concept of beings as made of relational space and time, that is an entity and its vital or Universal constants in its steady state of equilibrium is just a variation of Sp x Tƒ = ∆), Darwin (selection of species with the strongest, largest vital space, Sp and highest, more efficient informative brains Tƒ: Max. Sp x Tƒ = Top Predator existential force) and in modern physics…
By quantum theorists (understanding of space as made of quanta, called HPlanck), and Relativity (understanding of a Universe made of infinite clock of times, with different speeds relative to each other); the work of giving a proper philosophy of science, to the last of those discoveries (the fractal structure of the Universe in scales of selfsimilar form), its proper philosophical explanation was long overdue.
And so I introduced to the annual world congress of systems sciences and cybernetics, around 2006, this model and now a decade latter, I am trying to write a series of posts in a couple of webs, with the basic structure of the fractal Universe and its laws of time clocks and space quanta. I find the web, with its hyperlink, somehow also fractal structure, the proper network to do so. Most of it will then be poured in a site I bought long ago for that purpose – unification theory.com. As the fractal philosophy of the Universe is indeed the only approach to science that can truly unify all of them, each one studying a scale of the fractal Universe.
The task of updating our view of the Universe to the new paradigm of science after 2000 years of explaining it with what we could call in terms of logic and mathematics, the disciplines that underline all sciences, the Æparadigm, based in a continuous, flat Euclidean Space Geometry and a single Aristotelian arrow or clock of time, is indeed daunting by its sheer scope, so I only pretend to show in those posts the first steps of this road. And since my health is failing, I am not wasting energy, trying to focus the mirrors of individual scholars in penpal congresses. So those blogs will be the place where the new paradigm and its formalism ‘so far exists’, and the seminal origin of its future reproduction of its information. Or as Planck put it:
“New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.”
This again is obviously part of the fractal structure of mindmirrors, which reflect the Universe and then project its image into other mirrors, who ultimately cannot be obliged to absorb the image, and will do so only if they have already the seeds of ‘reason, beauty, and objective attitude towards knowledge’ required for a mirror to be repolished.
Regarding space it seems obvious again that humans have deformed it with its instruments of measure. We use a Cartesian infinite abstract paper graph to draw space. And so we decided that space was continuum as the paper and infinite. But reality around us – follow Leonardo’s method ‘saper vedere’, not your books – shows that space is not a continuum. Look around you and you will see an infinity of small, broken parts of space. Your vital spacebody, the chair you seat, the computer you read, are different ‘pieces of space’, ‘fractal space’.
Thus in the same manner there are infinite time frequencies and time cycles in nature – though we have found 3 parameters to measure them, frequency, speed and temperature, there are a lot of different ‘quanta of space’ around us, which we shall soon define, but we advance you one of them is that magic word, nobody knows in physics what it is: ENTROPY!
But for you to grasp this, I will have to keep explaining the foundations of that fractal structure of space and time, long proved experimentally, and formalized with the metric equations of physics, in a more mathematical way. Don’t worry we will keep it simple, because as we said, the advantage on working with the proper time clocks, as in the case of the proper ‘heliocentric theory’ is that all becomes really much more simple. So Copernicus was much ore simple than Ptolemy.
Now in physics all is about Spatial, Lineal Motions (Lineal Momentum, which is similar to our spatial quanta) and angular Momentum, which is the minimal bit of our Temporal, cyclical clocks of Information.
So alas!, we have an immediate translation of the 2 ‘formal motions’ of which all is made; spatial, lineal quanta and angular, cyclical, informative cocks of time.
And this quanta of spaces of lineal momentum and cycles of times, angular momentum are the 2 formal motions conserved in reality.
But Physicists ‘integrate’ those concepts in the concept of Energy, which they divide into Kinetic energy (related to lineal momentum) and Potential Energy (related to the internal, angular momentum and formposition of the system)
As those are historic concepts, born of praxis – as all in physics, they are not ‘scientifically’ as wide as precise, as the concepts of space quanta and cyclical time clocks – the concepts of fractal time and space. Since physical concepts drag the mechanist errors and historic professions of physicists– as theory is always as secondary element to the worldly profession of physicists – to make machines, weapons and measure reality wit them.
But they are good enough, and by trial and error very slowly physicists have given us a lot of good mathematical stuff to define reality, so with a bit of ‘conceptual cleansing’, and repositioning we can easily get into a much richer and beautiful understanding of reality.
But the consequence of NOT HAVING THE PROPER UNDERSTANDING OF TIME MOTIONS is that people no longer give a damn about understanding true time, the world cycle of life and death and any other time cycle, and we the people who truly understand time are a menace to the simpletons. They do have a problem with philosophers of science, but they have power. So our reasons matter not.
Yet when Kepler found the laws of locomotion of stars he affirmed, ‘God has waited 5000 biblical years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clockwork’. So for Kepler all knowledge was to know, F=ma.
The need for a more complex view of physics, beyond the simplex entropy arrow.
Humans are an arrogant species with an egocentric point of view. Since I presume I talk to a human, if this affirmation offends you, leave the blog now, because it will get worse, as knowledge, science is in the inverse objective function of human subjectivity. In brief, humans do not have a ‘scientific mind’, even those who think they do.
In fact, ‘scientists’ are the most difficult egos to convert into objective rational thought, because they think they are already there, and they understand it all. And yet human science is like a toddler, who has learned the first words of the language, which it reveres – the kid thinks the language has extraordinary powers to create reality as the first humans thought God created by speaking words, and the first scientists by speaking numbers. It should not be discouraging. After all we learned the first steps of science 2300 years ago with the arrival of Aristotelian Logic, and started to have instruments of measure, reliable to observe the Universe only 400 years ago with the experiments of Galileo, with mechanical clocks and telescopes. And we learned that space is made of quantum of energy and time has infinite clocks with different speeds only 100 years ago, with the arrival of quantum theory and relativity.
Those were the first doodles in the sand. But humans once they make a new doodle think the picture is complete. They step backwards, observe the doodle and spend one hundred years more commenting on how enormous was the arstist, how perfect the doodle, mirror of the Universe, even if its nothing but a doodle.
And so was human knowledge after Einstein and Planck made their doodles, slightly better than those of Galileo, halted for one hundred years. It remained a lot to be done for the doodle to look like a good image of the Universe.
As to understand the whole Universe, we had to put together all the sciences, species and laws of Nature, into that single mirrorimage. And the doodle of physicists was too simplex to do that. Now we have a doodle that looks a bit more like an image, and it is a beautiful one.
Of all the scientists that make doodles in the sands, the largest doodle is that of physicists. It is not a very complex doodle, but rather a simple line, very long indeed, the longer the faster the transport or weapon they design reaches. They also do doodles of the whole Universe, very big doodles, very simple, because 96% of the Universe is dark matter and energy they don’t see or understand what it is. But because the doodle is so huge, it impresses a lot the human observers, who think so well of themselves and respect enormously the doodles of physicists.
The problem with those doodles however is that they are very simple and so they do not reflect well the Universe. To avoid criticism though the physicist merely affirm that all what is not part of his doodle is not scientific or relevant to the drawing. And this is the case of information, the second arrow of future time in the Universe, which has more ‘form’ than the line of motion or entropy physicists study. So they are not at ease with the guys who draw forms of pure information, and pretend they must be included into the doodle. They call in fact information, negantropy, an obscenity that seems to deny their doodle.
And so when physicists came to power with its mechanisms, they decreed that all humans must worship energy and believe in the lineal doodle as a representation of it all.
Such was the state of affairs on sciences at the eve of a new millennium in which sciences of information had become dominant in all systems, due to the logarithmic evolution of integrated logic circuits (chips) applied to the processing of all forms of data. And the scalar nature of reality had found a mathematical model in the concept of selfsimilar fractals. Yet the doodle remains the entropic line of physicists and do not dare to deny it – you would be tagged as a negantropic scientist, whatever that means.
Indeed, despite that growing awareness of information as the key element in all systems, a formalism which included it as a primary element of reality was lacking for a simple reason: a 400 years tradition of using the simpler principle of conservation of energy and all its related analysis dating back to Galileo, to the point that information became known as negantropy, the negation of entropy among physicists who shied away from a complete overhauling of philosophy of sciences as we shall do in this blog, where we will consider by the correspondence principle, simplex physics, a ceteris paribus analysis of the Universe, with a single arrow of relative future, of the 2 arrows which constantly give all systems a choice in the path the system chooses to advance time, either increasing its energy or its information, whose properties we shall show are inverse.
In the graph, few scientists are aware of the idealist, Hegelian bias of German culture a century ago, which still permeates the loss of interest for the foundations of the scientific method in mathematical physics today. Thus we shall remember here the foundations of the scientific method…
Search for truth through experimental evidence, and logic sound models of reality with the addition of the elements of an organic model of the Universe. In the graph, two german idealists, during the panic of the ‘parallels’, which seized in rapture the entire world of mathematical physics after the greatest minds of the age could not solve, where to fit, the ‘multiple new geometries of the Universe, unlocalised in space and time. Unaware of the rather obvious 5th dimensional structure of those geometries, the panic extended from Gauss and Riemann, as propagators of Lobacjevski and soon brought to mathematical physics, the confusing notions of an idealist school of geometry where ‘by decree of Hilbert’, we human minds invent points, lines and cycles which are not defined.
By this the mathematicians separated itself against the clear argument of Lobachevski that affirmed, since a geometry is measured by those real parameters, the Tƒ/Sp, ration of time to space perception of the being (r2/l2), geometries will be defined by analysis of the real spaces of the different scientific realities we research.
Now we repeat, because today is not for mathematicians and physicists, evident:
‘Science is only concerned with the facts and events known and experimentally proved.’
This is a key element to understand what is ‘wrong’ with modern physics – the abandonment of the fundamental pillar of the scientific method – mathematical equations are NOT enough to define the existence of a process in time and space, if it is NOT observed.
This is ‘a religious belief’, which started in the earlier XX century, within the milieu of idealist Germanic philosophy (Hegel, Hilbert, who said he ‘imagines points, lines and planes’, etc.). It gave us idealist political systems (communism, Marxism) and what I call ‘fantaphysics’ today in a rage with computer models that seem so ‘truth’, but are mathematical fantasies. We do need a NONDEIST philosophy of science, and only organicism is a selfreproductive, selfsustained model – mechanical models do NOT respond to the whys of reality and require AN EXTERNAL GOD to make the machine (reason why Newton adopted it as a pious believer).
Thus what TŒ provides to physics is an organic guidance to interpret the known facts, and what the scientific model expects is to construct the universe, with the particles we know in the ∆1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales.
I repeat this is NOT what physicists do. They still model black holes without caring to find a substance of which they are made, just mathematically. They model the cosmic big bang, grossly ignoring clear theoretical and empirical contradictions, and they simply deny, as mathematical models become more complex, any ‘organic property’ to the Universe. They do NOT even inquire ‘why’, it behaves as it does.
Now of course, T.Œ – the organic, fractal model of the Universe and all its parts, should include by the principle of correspondence also ALL mathematical physics, which are consistent with experience:
So WE redefine BOTH in terms of THE 5D motionS of time and 5D forms of space:
“Algebra is the study of ST<>≈<>TS symmetries BETWEEN spacetime dimensions, hence focused in the Spatial p.o.v. and ITS OPERATIONS’ (we use often as synonymous the Latin term operandi, as usual trying to change slightly the jargon of stience from that of classi science).
Analysis is the study of ST<>≈<>TS stop and go motions THROUGH spacetime dimensions, hence focused in the Temporal=Change p.o.v. and ‘THE VARIABLES.’
And in this field, limited obviously by the work of a single polymath, there is still much work to do. But so far consistency in all those mathematical fields T.Œ has been tested is extremely high.
Physicists and scientists do work with the more complex reality but the underlying philosophy of science is stuck on this postulates, making all very Ptolemaic, and confuse. One of the tasks of TŒ is stopping the confusion with a simple methodology and a series of basic postulates about the nature of the organic, fractal Universe. So people can drop all those ‘postulates that so often hang up’ on their work and break it down to nonsense.
Consider for example the electron, which is OBVIOUSLY a fractal nebulae when in ST(st)ential wave state. This is taboo. Because when we measure it, the electron collapses into particle, as always waves and herds do organically when confronting a mass (schools, armies in battle formation etc.). And because we do have the continuum mantra. Now this brought about many problems ALSO in the entire field besides the quantum arguments wave or particle, Buridan ass kind of loss of time.
Legend: The Buridan ass died of hunger, because it could not decide which to eat of to equal bales of straw, left and right. Answer both. Do the experiment, the ass will eat first one and then the other, or eat a bit of each till ending both. Wave & particle, body & head. The organic paradigm is immediate. Do you have a body or a head, are you a body or a head. BOTH!
Now what I am going to say will be of course the reason why most ‘believers’ will abandon this web: physicists have no idea on the foundational laws of their discipline, because they have no idea of the nature of time, and have an astounding bias AGAINST cycles, in all its forms – cyclical geometry of spacetime, the true reason of attraction between particles (which first Newton and then Einstein clearly explained, and yet they are STILL trying to explain attraction with gauge theories of exchanges of lineal particles), cyclical time clocks with different speeds, which follow albeit with accelerations and decelerations in time, the laws of the 5^{th} dimension (so charges are the clocks of the quantum scale, masses of the gravitational larger cosmological scale, ‘time curves space into masses’, said Einstein) and yet they ARE still trying to unify both forces with ‘gauge theories’, when we shall show its Unification is immediate with 5D metric.
You see, I look at the immensity of the 5th dimension and see I am nothing but dust of spacetime, with a finite time duration. I see mankind is ‘a mush on the surface of a rock lost on the corner of the Universe’ (Schopenhauer) ‘departing from those facts we can talk about man’. Yes, we cannot know the limits of the Universe, we cannot affirm the bigbang theory is right, we cannot deny the infinite number of points of view, monads that perceive and order reality, we cannot deny as physicists do the organic properties of quantum systems which are bodywaves and headparticles at the same time, that move as waves and apperceive information as particles, just because as economists do with human masses, we can use statistical methods to analyze them.
This comes now and here for a simple reason. There are certain endemic errors in the way to do mathematical physics today. One of them is linearization.
It is understood as a ‘dogma’ that attraction between systems do happen by exchange of particles, called gauge ‘bosons’. This is NOT the case. It is ONLY the case of attraction or repulsion, i.e. communication between 2 points, according to the second Nonæ postulate of mathematics. It is in that sense important to have always in mind the geometry of the Universe and its worlds constructed with the properly defined points, lines, cycles and planes, and minds with the 5 postulates of ilogic geometry, which define and how they structure any mathematical physics in any scale.
Unfortunately physics today does no longer respect those principles of the Scientific method and or without a complex view of time and space, the dualities and fractal processes of creation of the constants of spacetime and planes of the 5th dimension.. This must be stressed once and again. Present physics has an ideology of subjective creationism behind it, born of the German Idealist school at the beginning of the XX century (Hilbert, Bohr, Heisenberg), which is today unknown – as most ‘European’, historic biases of sciences – by the American and Asian practitioners.
The ‘new civilizations’ ignoring how German Subjective philosophy deformed the scientific method defined by the Rational GreekLatin civilization (Aristotle, Descartes, Bacon, Galileo), don’t understand what Hegelian idealism meant in the German arrogant, subconscious collective of the turn of the century that created Communism (Marx), Nazism (Hitler, Rosenberg), the Copenhagen interpretation (Bohr, Bohm, Heisenberg) and the Axiomatic Method (Hilbert, Cantor), which resumes it all:
‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ said Hilbert in ‘Grundlagen der Mathematik’ – the foundational book of XX c. Mathematical physics. Hilbert Axiomatic method, which tried to prove all mathematics, and hence all possible mathematical equations of ‘imaginary physics’, departed of two absolutely wrong elements: ‘imagined Euclidean points with no breath, lines with no breath, planes with no height’, which were already proved false by the existence of ‘infinite parallels crossing a point’ (5 nonEuclidean postulate). Since if a point lets more than a parallel to cross, it has breadth to fit them. It is a fractal point, which grows in size as we come closer to it and enlarge it. This is the REAL unit of the fractal Universe. Points ARE not imagined, but humans do have limit of perception.
Point particles ARE not points. Simply they are the LIMIT of our perception of the Universe in the lower scales. As galaxies seemed points in the past. The 5th dimension of the scalar Universe has only observable limits.
So stars might seem points as particles do BUT if ∞ parallels can cross them, they are NOT Euclidean. Thus T.Œ first completes mathematics with 4 new NonEuclidean postulates: pints with breath, which are therefore timespace cycles, the new unit of the universe: a system which has an internal vital energy enclosed by a cyclical ‘1sphere’. And lines are waves, as its points do have volume and surface. And planes are ‘networks of lines’, with a wave amplitude. Suddenly mathematics becomes real and we can then consider godel’s incompleteness theory right: we cannot prove mathematics, an ‘experimental’ language, without reference to the real elements.
Since physics is basically mathematics applied to the description of physical systems, with elimination of all other perspectives, it is obvious that we must first consider some basic corrections on the mathematical models of physics in order to put some order to it.
This is specially relevant since physicists adopted a century ago a specific ‘ideology’ of mathematics, the abstract, idealist approach of Hegelian Germany, in which the influence of the idealism and subjectivism proper of the Germanic ‘subjective beliefpsyche’, as opposed to the rational, external Latin perspective imposed a certain way to interpret mathematical realities. Since in this view, mathematics is considered an ideal language of the human mind and what the mind perceives as real.
2 examples on what difference it makes, to see the world in abstract or in organic terms.
It was the axiomatic method of Hilbert, is full of meaningless egotrips, which influenced the 3rd, formal age of mathematics; Einstein’s rejection of ‘substance’ (formal motion in fact) for the waves of light, and Bohr’s rejection of density (fractal structure) for electrons. So Hilbert converted mathematical elements (points, lines and planes and their logic relationships into ‘platonic eidos=forms of the mind’, Einstein converted ‘space’ into ‘frames of reference’, perspectives of the human mind and its visual light spacetime rod of measure, and Bohr converted densities of ‘boson light’ which form the electronic wave into probabilities of human measure.
It was the seventh day and the 3 JewishGerman Gods of XX century theoretical science rested. They had finally achieved the transformation of the old Abrahamic religions in which the words uttered by rabbis and priests were ‘truth per se’, into modern scientific religions, in which the ‘imagination’ of the selfnamed geniuses of the universe were truth per se. And so Einstein when a perhaps more insightful journalist told him, what if ‘Relativity is not truth’ (beyond its capacity to measure form the human point of view), then ‘God should change the Universe so beautiful it is’. And the 3 together spanked the monkey ever since with droves of scholars all happy thinking they were imagining the Universe.
Now back to reality mathematics remained immutable, points still existed as fractal beings, lines were still waves of points communicating formal motions between them and planes still were created by points into topological networks and planes outside the brain of Hilbert.
For example, a number which is ‘a society of identical beings’, whose properties are derived of the social nature of the 5D universe of parts and wholes, and whose sequential order in a line derives of the fact that parts come before wholes, is not yet defined.
In essence, the 3 branches of mathematics correspond to the 3 structural elements of T.Œ: geometry to space, algebra to time and analysis to the fractal structure of the 5th dimension. We only need to update mathematics for consistency between the 5th NonEuclidean postulate of geometry and the 4 remaining ones, still Euclidean, and the Aristotelian logic of Algebra, to the ternary symmetries of fractal 5D spacetime to make mathematics a ‘realist’ experimental science.
This might surprise the reader, and it is perhaps the highest feat of T.Œ – to be able to unify all different languages of human thought, proper of each discipline. Consistency achieved in art styles, when developing the theory of human superorganisms, might surprise the reader, is based in the same 3 ages of time, that allow us to define the laws of quark colors. And yet, this unity of the ternary symmetries of the Universe makes T.Œ so enticing to the mind.
However and this also differentiates deeply T.Œ and General Systems Sciences or any ‘serious’ scientific model of reality for that matter with present physics, T.Œ considers ‘ABOVE’ mathematical reason, Experimental Evidence and at the same rank of truth Logic temporal reason (of a kind paraphrasing Saint Augustine, higher than that of ‘present’ man), the ternary logic of the symmetries between the 3 topologies of space and the 3 ages of time and the 3 relative scales of size coexisting in all organic structures of the Universe.
Thus given the confused state of affairs in the definition of fundamental concepts such as time (logic), space (dimensions) etc. in modern physics, we need to consider the seemingly not so innovative principles of the scientific method with the slight modifications of an organic, symmetric ternary Universe. We resume the new scientific method in our simple formula, T.Œ=SC³ with each letter signaling a fundamental principle of truth in science:
As all:
T: Timespace systems are:
Œ: Organic, Experimentally Evident.
…meaning Timespace systems do have organic properties, which can be explained mathematically and logically with the languages of space and time, and proved experimentally.
And since they are made of 3 simple elements, 5D scales of Space and Time they are:
S, Simplex and their truths follow the proof of simplicity (Ockham’s razor)… yet they are also ternary..
C³ Complex, due to the ternary symmetries of its structure ternary complexity born of the…
Cyclical repetition of those Simplex principles which…
Correspond with all previous theories of reality.
Thus T.Œ=SC³ resumes the Principles of Science and the Organic paradigm, are however broken in present science, specially by mathematical physics, which no longer respects the 3 principles of classic philosophy of science: experimental proof, Simplicity (Occam’s razor) and Correspondence with previous theories. And this is the ‘problem of modern physics.
Now once we have brought Mathematics back to reality from the axiomatic age of German idealism, we can build a much sounder mathematical conceptualization of the key concepts of mathematical physics, dimensions of spacetime with motion (topological fractal dimension), lines≈waves and its ternary networks that come together forming super organisms, relative planes=topological networks with dark spaces between them, dual moving and static formal motions, integrals and derivatives in space and time of those social networks, and emergence processes of time clocks and lineal entropies.
This shows a fundamental truth of T.Œ: reality, experimental evidence is always the definitive element to analyze truth. Hence the rejection of the axiomatic method of mathematics, in the line of Lobachevski and Gödel, and the present estate of fantaphysics, in the line of Einstein’s expectation for real descriptions, cutoff substances for black holes (tcb quarks, its atoms of maximal density) he refused to call black holes and called appropriately frozen stars; the only physicist we ‘save’ from our harsh judgment on their merits as explorers of the why of the Universe
Now we want to be slightly more precise to attack a fundamental conundrum which matters to this blog – the structure of the Universe and the risks imposed by the big bang on Earth. What are the chances that the planet become a black hole or a strangelet? Are we at risk? It is the Universe made of them? Are we so important that we cannot disappear?
To that aim we must first consider what is possible in physics and what is not according to the scientific method.
Now, the fundamental conclusion of the scientific method regarding to astrophysics is obvious but only Einstein pound on it – as he was the only physicist we save as philosophers of science, for respecting the scientific method of true evidence, and simplicity:
‘Physicists should not be occupied with the study of events or species of which there is NOT experimental evidence. Since it is not science’.
And ‘I know when mathematics are truth but NOT when they are real’.
In brief, a physicist must use only the available particles and entities to construct the universe, not those which its mathematical, inflationary distorted linguistic mind view wants to crate for the pleasure of it. Information, minds are inflationary. They are a dime a dozen billion, to put it mildly but worlds of linguistic nature are not reality.
So we will build in Tœ, the Universe perfectly logically explaining al phenomena only with the available particles and forms, and the ternary symmetries of the 5^{th} dimension, fractal space and cyclical time.
As a galaxy is also a ternary system, a timespace being, defined by the Fundamental Equation of T.Œ
The world cycle of existence. Travel through the 5th dimension.
It is clear that the fractal generator has many properties, and so it requires several languages to explain it, though so far we have found mathematical languages to be quite good to provide an image of the Universe.
Thus we expressed the Generator in mathematical, ‘geometric’ and ‘algebraic, symbolic, logic equations’ that generate ∞ variations of those ‘topological’=spatial and ‘logic=temporal structures’.
As, if we substitute the values of each of the parameters of a logic generator, within the ternary constrains of the 3 only topologies of a 4Dimensional sheet of spacetime, toroid, hyperbolic and spherical ones, and the 3 only ‘agesdimensionsmotions of time, Past, Present and future’ then we obtain ∞ varieties of the forms the logicgeometric fractal equation defines.
But it is also obvious that the ternary fractal generator, with those constrains of 3 ‘space’ and 3′ time’ elements, and its constant conversion of ‘space’ into ‘time’, ‘motion into stillness’, ‘lineal kinetic energy into cyclical information’ and so on, can be expressed with other languages as long as they are mirrors that respect the perception of those outer realities. So before mathematics existed, humans went along with the ternary mirrors of the Universal Grammar:
Subject (informative human being) < Verb (spacetime action) > Object (energy of the subject to act upon).
And we did fine, with this other linguistic mirror. While Animals do have their codes of colours:
Red (energy colour: bloodfood) < Green (reproductive colour: Plant) > Blue (informative colour: lightwatersky)
Which are both ‘subjective’ mirrors but also objective mirrors on the properties of light and matter.
Further on, there are mirrors with only 2 ‘essential elements’ one for spatial energy (white space) and the other for temporal information (blackbody forms) with grey combinations of spacetime, used by painters (which draw the form with black lines and fill the space with white surfaces) and filmmakers (hence a code of colour that computer metalminds, a fast evolving new species on Earth can comprehend). Moreover, light can also see the lower and upper scales of the 5th dimension that future robots will ‘perceive directly’, making for them ‘evident’ the existence of that 5th dimension.
So the ∆terms of the Fractal Generator of the Universe that represents the scalar dimensions of any system of scalar spacetime will become ‘direct knowledge’ to them.
Thus we conclude that what we are truly showing with our Fractal Generator, is a language above ALL languages, including mathematics, that defines the logic structure of all Systems of the Universe.
Since when we substitute each of those dimensional symbols for a specific variety of language we obtain a specific mindmirror, that is the 3 parts of any language.
As we keep repeating, since surely you will keep forgetting it, man has a problem, the ego paradox which is embedded in the structure of living fractals, such as:
‘Every fractal point of view, gauges information with the limited still languages of its mind, from its perspective creating a selfcentred world image that makes him to think the centre of the Universe’.
But science is exactly the selfreflection on the objective reality in which that subjective egoworld is infinitesimal. Science thus grows as we move away from the selfcentred point of view, from ‘chosen of god’, and only intelligent beings, to the Earth as the centre, the sun as the centre, the galaxy spacetime made of light (Einstein) as the fixed rod, to the new ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY OF THE FRACTAL PARADIGM, NO CENTER, NO PREVAILING SCALE, NO PREVAILING P.O.V.
The expansion of objective truths define science.
Now, this expansion of knowledge based in the reduction of Ego, is the essence of human mental evolution. First, in Abrahamic egocentered religions believers in the west thought their tribe was chosen and their valley the only promised land. Next they expanded its ‘ego’, in this case from the tribe to the subconscious collective or ‘social God’ of humans. Yet still they thought the ego of humans was of cosmic proportions, as the game of creation of the Universe (god) cared for them. Next physicists came and found lineal clocks and since ‘God was the seer of time’ (Saint Augustine), now physicists were in tune with him. So Kepler said that ‘god had waited 5000 (biblical) years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clock work’ making his mind equal to the creator of ‘lineal time and the whole Universe.’
So those are the steps of prescientific knowledge:
1) each western tribe decided that his valley was the promised land, his tribe was ‘God’ who spoke of the supremacism of his people over all other humans and then:
2) Physicists understood the infinite, reaching a paroxysm of egocentered infinitesimal beliefs that would be ridiculous and laughable if it were not tragic for the nonfuture of mankind – as we are killing the planet and making ever more powerful weapons of lineal entropy to kill each other till the infinitesimal becomes zero.
And this was paralleled with serious scientists who did an enormous work of objective science, without subjective egotrips, accumulating enough information in all the scales of the Universe, its systems and fractal structures to the point that we can now be completely objective (; and realise we are nothing but dust of spacetime ):
The whole range of biological, organic, temporal and spatial=mathematical properties of fractal entities.
Now it is essential to include as we shall see in the fractal paradigm the distortions of the different mirrors and egotrips and lack of total information of a given point of view in science. They will keep coming for all sciences, as to be an ego is ultimately to be a fractal point, a knot of timespace cycles deforming reality to your point of view. And of course, the concept of a single, absolute space measured with our rods of space – meters and time clocks – mechanical seconds, is the first deformation.
Since we humans do NOT see REALITY as it IS, a fractal tapestry of infinite vital spaces, put together into an absolute space only in the mind of men; and a tapestry of infinite different clocks of nature, put together artificially into a single mechanical clock, by human beings.
And the second is to deny with reductionist mathematics, organic, biological, causal, aperceptive properties to each monad of the Universe, to each point and each scale.
Now what is reality should have become obvious at this stage, if any of the finitesimal points of view, selfcentred in their ego called humans have had the patience to arrive here. But we shall repeat it, in the initial definition we made of ‘All what exists’:
“The Universe is the sum of all the symmetric, ternary super organisms (spatial synchronous view) performing a world cycle of 3 ages between generation and extinction (diachronic point of view), as they travels through 3 relative planes of the 5th dimension, growing in size and diminishing in a balanced, Sp x Tƒ= ∆±1 survival form, performing from its centred point of view, the 5 spacetime actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, (active meaning of space and time), ±∆e,i,∫u, which ensures their survival.”
In this definition, where we can introduce everything, the classic analysis of locomotions in lineal time of physics is just a little letter at the end of it, ±∆e, that is the study of energetic motions, locomotions and its internal and external storage.
So much for those who think physics explains it all and it is the fundamental science of mankind.
Let us then return to philosophy of science and summarize all those findings into…
The fractal, isomorphic, linguistic method of scientific knowledge.
The Universe speaks ‘infinite languages’ (Upanishads) NOT only mathematics. And each of its fractal elements, made to the image and likeness of the whole, have the following minimal properties, which I called the isomorphisms of the Universe:
 A Œ linguistic, mental point of maximal information (C.P.U., quark, crystal, brain, roots, black hole and so on), which constantly switched between the 4 states of space, time, energy and information, the 4+û actions developing the game; whose equations were crystal clear in quantum (4 numbers), Electromagnetism (3+color dimension), Electricity (4 Maxwell equations), and easy to deduce in Mechanics (i.e. Hamiltonians describe its 3 time ages, 4 vector equations, etc.)
 A topological, Organic, Synchronous, ternary structure in space Sp<ST>Tƒ, of limbs/fields<bodies/waves>heads/particles.
 And its asymmetric, Diachronic, causal order in time, Sp (Past, entropic youth)> SP, Present Adult reproduction > Tƒ, Future, Formal, Old age of information; from where topological laws of development and evolution and the ages and horizons and diversification of species could be obtained.
 An organic structure in the 5 Dimension of ∆1, ∆, ∆+1, quantum/cellular, individual, Thermodynamic and Gravitomagnetic, ecosystemic Planes.
 A survival, active program of existence through ∂a,e,i,œ,û to regain ±∆e, i and evolve socially into bigger wholes.
Now each science does have its own jargon, and ‘choice’ of characteristics it prefers to describe from its elements of study, under the egoparadox that makes each point of view to create a ‘particular world’ that distorts the ‘whole Universe’ into its perceived linguistic mind, with itself at the center and only relevant point of view.
We have in that sense criticize physicists from their description of physical reality ONLY from a mathematical, spatial, point of view, and ONLY describing of the 6 motions of reality, its Locomotion, making a confusing distorted vision of what time is in lineal terms and space is in continuous terms, ignoring completely the laws of the 5^{th} dimension.
But we have generalized the concept to the quantum and Antiquantum paradoxes for all physical and social sciences, in which either the observer is too small (social scientist) or too big (physicist), to relate objectively to the observable (which in social sciences is so big that is guilty to deform the sociologists to cater its view, and in physics is so small than the physicist is guilty to distort it.)
And for that reason only biological sciences do have a proper point of view. But even in biology the cultural influence of social sciences is all too evident, as ‘the concept of chaos and entropy’, from physics and ‘Darwinian, capitalist, selfmade man individualism’ sips in.
So it is taboo to talk of the fundamental law of social evolution which is social love of members of the species to become larger beings, which is epitomized in the most successful species on Earth, the Argentinean Ant which has excluded from the pampa all other top predators of larger size, and now is colonizing as we speak, under my foot South Europe, becoming the largest, most numerous species (1/4 of all the flesh living in this planet is ant, another ¼ humans, the 2 social species).
And on the other hand the concept of chaos and entropy has prevented to understand the topological plan of evolution, controlled by the fact that we are made only of space and time, and its similar ‘active’ concepts of kinetic energy and information.
So the explanation of why wings are planes of space and eyes spheres of time… and have evolved so fast, is ignored. The reason though is obvious in T.Œ, a system to survive has only 3 paths, maximal Tƒ in its spherical organs of information, maximal Sp, in its planar organs of kinetic motion and maximal reproduction, improving its networks of communication, either individual or social. And so this implies with the limiting existence of only 3 topologies in the Universe, that those 3 natural paths can evolve very fast, as genetics do work also in ternary symmetries that code those forms.
Further on from physics, biologists have acquired the idea that all comes from the bottom up, so they do not understand the duality of hyperbolic information vs. elliptic motion, which makes also the upper wholes program through larger fields of motion and form, entropy and information, space and time, kinetic and potential energy, lineal and angular momentum variations (all concepts selfsimilar of the fundamental duality of the Universe, which apply to different systems), its smaller parts. The most obvious case is the relationship between glaciation ages of maximal evolution of information (as cold temperatures imply form) and hot periods of maximal reproduction, (radiations of species) and the whole structure of evolution of the Earth in III earths and 3 x 3 + 1 subphases.
And so for each species and ‘scale’ studied by a science, we needed to extract mental, topological, causallogic, and organicsurvival properties, which were different linguistic, isomorphic angles on the perception of the being, none of them carrying the whole truth of the being, but as the famous elephant parable, seeing only a part of it.
THE PANTHEIST, SENTIENT UNIVERSE
‘Reality is a fractal of cyclic≈iterative timespace actions, knotted into exi=stential worldcycles, which travel along 3 ±n planes of the 5^{th} dimension, between birth and extinction.’
Sancho, on TŒ
The pantheist Universe and its infinite varieties of ‘Worlds’.
So, the 5th dimension is a deep philosophy of science, which explores a pantheist Universe, which ultimately is as simple as its 2 ‘formal motions’, time cycles, which we can perceive as cyclical rotary motions with a frequency measure, or as ‘forms’ of information’, Tƒ, in the stillness of the mind. And a series of extended, entropic, ‘—motions’, Sp. And those lineal and cyclical motions, Ox=ø form the infinite of complementary beings, made of particles/heads and bodies/waves that structure physical and biological and mechanical systems. So indeed, Leibniz again, the great forgotten master, who revealed us the main logic structures of the Universe, but was too complex for its age, said that all could be represented with a binary language of O and , which now computers do use to represent it all; while string theorists try to build reality departing from O, closed strings, which are really the minimal ‘time cycles’ and , open strings, which are really the minimal spatial bits of ‘entropic motions’.
Now if you are more of a robotic machine, which is how most human minds work today, all those ambivalences will bother you. And so you can return to your computerized brain and fill fulfilled with a mathematical formula, which is fine, as it will give you the how. But you will never understand the why, why you live and die, why you are how you are, why you have indeed a head and a body and limbs, why you were young and you will be old and die, why you love and reproduce, as everything else in the Universe?
Those are some of the basic questions we shall answer, quantitatively, qualitatively and organically, which are the 3 main linguistic properties of the 3 ‘components’ of the Universe, its spatial motions (which has been the main focus of science till today and are better described with geometry, topology and numbers – which are ‘societies of points’ that extend in space), its time cycles (which are better explained causally, qualitatively, through its 3 relative ages/phases/horizons/motions of past’—motions’, repetitive present and informative future) and its multiple ‘relative’ planes of size, from the smaller quanta to the larger galaxy, through the human planes of existence (which are better described organically, as parts organize socially through number, into wholes back and forth through its lifedeath world cycles).
Now here again we have resumed you the Universe of space, time, and relative scales of size which put together create a fifth dimension, through the 3 main languages of the mind, mathematical space, logic causal time, and biologic, systemic organization. It is another of the multiple kaleidoscopic points view we will apply to that astounding ‘fractal’ generator, ultimately as simple as a combination of spatial motions, time cycles across infinite sizes, we call the universe. But you must try to reform your mind, change your chip and accept that multiplicity, mandala, iteration, variation, perspective, relativity, ambivalence, duality, motion and form, space and time, energy and information, yin and yang, are not that easy to define, as the simplifications of simple absolute continuous space and time were.
******************************
Absolute Newtonian Time is an obvious abstract artifact called in physics ‘background spacetime’. Since it is supposed to be in the ‘background’ of reality. But where is that background? The answer is in ‘the paper’, since it is truly derived from the pen and paper drawing of Descartes and its Cartesian coordinates, in which time clocks and its cycles are ‘elongated into an artificial line’ to measure motions in space with a simple formula: V=S/T.
This formula with a line of time equal to that of space, helps to calculate ‘motions’ , as we all know, since now both Space and Time have the same lineal appearance and we can divide them.
The problem though is that we loose the cyclical clocklike nature of time cycles, the reason why events are cyclical, actions are cyclical, and most motions in nature from orbits to clocks and atoms are cyclical. Besides lineal timepaper gave the impression that reality had also an abstract drawing made by some sort of God that put it there, as Descartes did in his paper. So reality was ‘put’ over a mathematical drawing. Since as Galileo clarify to us: ‘mathematics is the language of God’. Yet when we observe ‘real magnitudes’ in Nature, they are always measured with cyclical time (the inverse parameter of lineal time, ƒ=1/T=T‾¹, the real thing); from speed, LxT‾¹ to Energy, M x L² T‾², we will realize that the true of the Universe is an infinity of beings performing time cycles that mold the form, the information of its vital spaces.
Reality is indeed a fractal made of infinite vital spaces, which move in cyclical, constant patterns or ‘time clocks’ for a finite duration between birth and extinction:
∑S x T¯¹ = C
From particles of cyclical time, controlling waves of vital space that moves (quantum physics) to human systems made with heads that move over the bodies and limbs they control, we shall see the enormous power to explain the whys, forms in space, and actions in time, of that simple ‘complementary system’, which is the fundamental particle of the Universe.
This reality of beings made of relational time cycles, ruling moving spaces, however was forgotten for 2 centuries.
Then the Physical revolution started in the XX century, proved certain Leibniz, since Quantum theory showed that space is broken in infinite quanta of ‘—motions’, or ‘Energy’ and Einstein’s Relativity theory proved that there were infinite clocks of time with different speeds , but Physicists could not properly formalized together both discoveries, and soon they were dedicated to do just detailed analysis of different species, its time clocks and energy quanta, without fully developing the formal and mathematical model of relational spacetime. Einstein tried but he gave up saying ‘Leibniz is right but to complete his model we have to rewrite all the science since the beginning’. As indeed, the pen and paper drawing of Descartes was everywhere, in science.
This r=evolution is what the understanding of the metric of the 5th dimension achieves. And we shall pour in this site. Its understanding is not so much a problem of complexity – it does in a sense simplify the Universe with its Ockham’s razor, explaining many more things with lesser parameters and simpler equations, but of its sheer extension (as it encompasses the entire Universe, all its sciences and species, within its formalism).
Now the first two steps in the mathematical formalism of all those different time cycles and different spatial quanta is to order them and find how they combine into the constant, stable dual beings made of particles/heads of information and fields/limbs of energy we see around us.
‘—motions’ vs. cyclical form (and the related parameters of energy and information).
Now there is a big problem with the understanding of the 5th dimension, which is plainly, bluntly speaking the errors that physicists have committed in their understanding of Time. And the entire conceptual frame derived of it – words like space, energy, ‘—motions’, arrow of time, duration etc. So we shall attempt to make some basic definitions from the beginning with the minimal corrections involved to try to make a ‘bridge’ with the reader school on those errors. We have already dealt with the problem of ‘timeduration’, and offered the inverse function of ‘imploding, clocks of time’ with a frequency that carries the information of the Universe, Tƒ.
Universe and all its parts are organic networks of Spatial entropy & temporal information.
All type of Universal systems can be described as social networks of energy and information. Its similar=isomorphic laws are studied by general systems sciences.
IN THE GRAPH we see one of such isomorphisms: that of form, as systems form spherical topologies with a center of information the nucleus of the galaxy, the game of the stadium, which is a ‘ball’ that all players, lines of energy pursuit (; While in the center we see two herds without a clear center, proper of ‘energy systems’, a herd of insects feeding, a polymer atom of great strength without a crystalline center.
This site offers, the first formal, logic and mathematical model of those isomorphisms, from where we can deduce the main laws of each science that studies a relative ‘scale’ of spatial size of the social, organic Universe, from physics which studies its smaller and larger atomic and galactic scales to biology and social sciences which study its intermediate life and human scales.
All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of energy and information, which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity selfsimilar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.
In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating selfsimilar particles.
In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce selfsimilar forms.
Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.
We formalize all Dual systems and events of reality born of dual systems of energy and information with an Equation we call the ‘Fractal Generator of Reality’: Se<=>To. Since we claim this equation resumes all the events and forms of the Universe. And so we define a widened principle of energy and information:
‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that selforganize themselves in bigger, selfsimilar scales’.
And so from the fact that all systems are made of dimensions of Spatial motion>Energy and Temporal Form> Information, across several U±4 spatial planes of Time world cycles of life and death, we extract common laws, called isomorphisms for all of them