Home » ” §upœrganisms

” §upœrganisms

±∞∆•ST

Advertisements

 SUMMARY

I. Superorganisms. The fundamental particle.

II.Epistemology: Rashomon effect: The five perspectives on Supœrganisms: S@≈∆ð

III. Proofs in all ∆ Planes

∆¡>|2|. Physical systems.

∆¡<|3|. Biological systems.

∆i≈1,2. Historic systems.

****

 ∆§UPŒRGANISMS

Reality is a 5D fractal of space-time beings.

If we were to explain this formally a simple insights in the mathematical structure of the fractal universe will suffice:

  • The unit of mathematics is the numbers, which is a social group of identical beings. Thus in as much as the Universe is mathematical is social. Those identical numbers gather in social networks, which co-exist together thanks to the symbiosis between its information and energy.

Yet, the organisation of those social groups is also ‘organic’ vital, as the In the Universe is a fractal of information, which has the organic properties of vital fractals:

  • A fractal is made of smaller parts, connected through networks that repeats similar patterns in different scales of size. This in NATURE, means that the Universe evolves as a fractal growing and replication its form in the different ‘scales of space-time’, from the smallest particles through atoms, molecules, cells, matter states, organisms, ecosystems… solar systems galaxies and dark matter networks of galaxies (some of those scales are shown in the graph), all of them similar in form.
  • A fractal is a self-reproductive system, whose fundamental purpose is to ‘iterate’, that is, to reproduce patterns of information.

In nature we see also reproduction happening constantly in a fractal manner, as any system of any scale of nature will reproduce a minimal seed of information in its lower scale (humans a seminal seed, electrons a light beam, and so on), which will then grow and multiply an emerge in the upper fractal scale as a whole being.

In the next graph we see the organisation of all those systems, through networks of energy (blood-economics in historic systems) and information (words and laws of nervous and political systems in human social organisms) to which cells-citizens attach to form a perfect social super organism.

So the goal of social systems sciences is to design with the laws of the organic universe the perfect superorganism of history that will survive and make history and its cells, all of us, human citizens of god the superorganism of mankind not of any tribe or group of believers, but all of us, a perfect system, as all others in nature are:

Super-organisms: knots of cyclical Time Arrows.

We are all made of spatial ‘—motions’, flows that seem to occupy space but are ‘vital space’ and have a ‘causal why’. For that reason, all species participate of the geometric and causal properties of the arrows of ‘—motions’ and information and follow the same patterns of self-organization to create a higher ‘space-time plane’ of reality. So, for example, all informative systems will be on top, in the dimension of height; they will be smaller than the complementary ‘—motions’ system and they will have cyclical form, regardless of the species we describe. So DNA nuclei are round and smaller than the cell’s body, heads and antennas are on top and are cyclical and smaller than the body or tower that holds them, cameras are small and spherical, etc.

Since, once we understand the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, the old distinction between organic and inorganic form loses its meaning, beyond its anthropomorphic role of making man the only intelligent, vital species of the Universe.

The complex logic and Non-Euclidean geometry of those knots of Time Arrows set the formal basis to understand the structure of the Universe and all its self-similar parts. Since:

‘The Universe and all its parts are fractal entities of ‘—motions’ and information.’

Though the specific combinations of ‘—motions’ or information of each species – defined by its ‘vital’ or physical, Universal Constants (‘—motions’/information ratios) – might vary, the space-time structures and cycles of all those social organisms will be self-similar: All entities are ‘cellular societies’ organized through ‘—motions’ and information networks that bring about processes of social evolution.

In all species studied by science a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines, guided by financial networks of information (salaries, prices, costs); galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous, informative system.

A tree is a group of leaves, branches and roots connected by a network of ‘—motions’ (salvia) and information (chemical particles). Cultures are made of humans related by verbal, informative isomorphisms and economic networks that provide their ‘—motions’.

Stiences study those organic systems, tied up by networks of ‘—motions’ and information. In the graph, we see the main st-planes studied by human sciences and their 4 main time arrows, Sp<=>Tƒ, which in static space give birth to the ‘organic elements’ of all species: social cell of ‘—motions’ and information and the reproductive networks that relate them. Thus, there are 4 basic elements in all organic systems:

  • Cellular units.
  • Networks of ‘—motions’ or vital space.
  • Networks of fractal information.
  • Networks that reproduce ‘—motions’ and information.

All entities are generated by reproductions and transformations of ‘—motions’ and informative cycles (ΣS<=>Tƒ), organized in cellular units, through networks, and ±∆ Planes of self-similar forms. Yet, since those cellular units ∆-1 are made of smaller st-2 cells, which show the same structure, we can define any organic system as a super-organism (made of smaller, self-similar super-organisms):

We establish thereafter a parameter of multiple space-time complexity, st=∆, to classify all those relative scales of spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information of the Universe, starting by the simplest scales, st=0 (mathematical cycles and lines), st=1 (Gravitational space), st=2 (electromagnetic space), st=3 (atomic particles) and so on, till reaching the most complex, macro-structures of the Universe (st=9, galaxies).

This parameter becomes essential to formalize a type of scientific isomorphisms widely ignored by science, which define the interåctions between several scales of reality. In physics:

– Between the small quantum scale of electroweak forces and the bigger gravitational space-time.

– In biology between the cellular microcosms, the individual organism and the ecosystems or societies in which those organisms exist, as individual ‘cells’ of a bigger whole – the species. Since those relationships are essential to explain all kind of natural and social phenomena, from the life/death cycle (in which cells reproduce, organize socially in networks, emerge as individuals of herds and societies, and die, dissolving again their complex ‘st’ networks into ∆-1 cells), to the meaning of religions, in which humans act as mental cells of a subconscious collective we call God.

At present though, each science studies only one scale of form and its specific isomorphisms and events, as if they were unrelated to the isomorphisms of all other scales and species. Only System Stiences, the philosophy of science considered in this work, studies together the mathematical, morphological and biological isomorphisms that define the 4 main arrows of time and apply those isomorphisms to all the species of each of those scales, since the Isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times are common to all of them, regardless of the ‘specific’ qualities of each species:

– All species in the Universe absorb ‘—motions’, gauge information (even particles, reason why their theories are called gauge theories), reproduce (quarks absorb ‘—motions’ and reproduce jets of ‘quarkitos’; so do electrons that absorb ‘—motions’ and break into a shower of new electrons, and since those are the two basic particles of reality, it follows that all systems can be reproduced), and finally, all entities of the Universe evolve socially, gathering together into bigger super-organisms, from particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become living organisms that become societies, nations and religions, super-organisms of History.

Thus Super-organisms are made of:

– Relative ‘—motions’ and information units (ΣSe, ∏Tƒ), whose cycles/cells of transformation are described by feed-back equations

– 3 dimensions/physiological networks of ‘—motions’, information and reproduction (ΣSp∆-1,<=>, ∆).

– Their ±∆ social Planes that ad ∆-1 cells into ΣExist-ential wholes, parts of a bigger Existential ∆+1 whole.

Recap: The 2 primary arrows of time, ‘—motions’ and information are geometrical, and its properties can be studied with the isomorphisms of mathematical physics; while the 2 complex arrows of time, reproduction and social evolution are biological, explained as ‘strategies of survival’ that ensure the immortality of the logic systems of the Universe.

The shapes of ‘—motions’ and information are ‘invariant at scale’, meaning that cycles of information on one side and forces of lineal ‘—motions’ on the other side, reproduce their shapes and gather together into bigger, cellular, social networks, creating dual entities, made of ‘fields/bodies of ‘—motions’’ (physical/biological jargon) and ‘particles/heads of information’, (Principle of Complementarity). All systems of the Universe are complementary, formed with a region dominant in ‘—motions’ arrows (body or force) and a region dominant in information cycles (particle, head). Those dual, social, whole entities have more ‘—motions’ and last longer in time than individual parts. Thus, species with a limited vital space and time duration ensure their immortality by expanding its size in space and its duration in time, as parts of bigger ‘—motions’/information systems.

In the graphs, we classify all the scales of the 5th dimension as super organisms  according to the social networks that create below all Universal and human super organisms:

‘A super-organism is a group of cellular super-organisms joined by energetic, informative and reproductive networks.’

 

The principle of organicism: The 4th paradigm of knowledge.

A deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.

The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.

The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system. The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.

The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.

In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’. This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.

Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future. So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry). This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.

That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts? Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle?  Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).

According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe. The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newtonnt.0.4. Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

The 4th paradigm in a nutshell: The Universe is an organic system of energy and information.

All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of energy and information, which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism, reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.

We formalize all Dual systems and events of reality born of complementary networks of energy and information with an Equation we call the ‘Fractal Generator of Reality’: ∑E<=>∏i. Since we claim this equation resumes all the events and forms of the Universe. It is the key equation of organicism, the philosophy of science called General Systems Sciences that considers the Universe and all its parts an organic system generated by feed-back, iterative exchanges, <=>, of energy (E) and information (I) between both type of  networks, (∑, ∏). The symbol ∑(E) means that body systems are loose sums of cellular herds that only relate to their neighbors. ∏(I) means that informative systems form complex networks in which each element connects with all others, multiplying its ‘axons’. For example, 5 informative elements have 5×5=∏5 axons. Thus, information networks co-exist in two scales. They are more complex than energy systems and dominate them. So informative particles, heads and money dominate respectively energetic fields of forces, bodies and the physical economy. The Generator Equation of Reality will allow us to derive a set of rules from where to extract the properties and laws of all disciplines of science, each one specialized in the study of the entities of energy and information of a certain scale of reality, from the smallest complementary entities studied by quantum theory to the biggest one, the Universe, a system of galaxies related by networks of dark energy and informative, gravitational forces. We can, departing from those concepts, define also the Universe and all its parts:

‘The Universe is a fractal, organic system, which reproduces complementary, social networks of energy and information that self-organize themselves in bigger, self-similar scales’.

We mean by energy, motion; that is, displacement in space, which is a relational concept, first defined by Leibniz: The sum of all motions, simplified by the eye-mind as a continuous, static extension creates our perception of space. And we mean by information, dimensional, cyclical form. And the sum of all cyclical forms-in-action, in-form-ations, which our mind perceives as cycles of clock-time, creates relational, ‘fractal’ time, also defined first by Leibniz, one of the fathers of the 4th paradigm1. Energy without motion or form without energy is not perceivable. Thus, systems to exist need a minimal quantity of both or they cease to exist – they die. Or as Taoist, the closest, classic philosophy to this book put it: ‘All yin-information has a drop of yang-Energy; all Yang has a drop of yin’.

Further on, because all systems respond to the same laws, we can recognize the shapes of a network dominant in energy by its form that will be lineal, planar, extended in space, as the line is the shortest distance between two points; hence the shape with more motion. And we can recognize the shapes of information because they are smaller in space, broken and cyclical, as the cycle or sphere is the shape that stores more form in lesser space; hence the perfect form of information.

So DNA nuclei, particles, heads and coins of money, made of gold, the best informative atom of the Universe, are cyclical and small. While fields of forces, moving bodies and weapons, made of iron, the most energetic atom of the Universe, are lineal and big. Finally, real physical, biological and mechanical systems are those who transform back and forth energy and information, between their two poles: E<=>I.

It follows also that cyclical information, frequency and time cycles are related. On the other side, expansive energy, motion and space, which stores energy in the vacuum are also related. So energy is fractal space and information fractal time – facts that will allow to fusion the jargon of many sciences in this volume of the series dedicated to the detailed description of physical systems and the 3rd volume dedicated to biological and sociological systems (the superorganisms of history and economics).

However before we can do that, we need to consider the formalism of this new paradigm of science – that is the laws of mathematics and logic that all systems of the Universe follow.

The expansion of knowledge achieved by complex sciences with a logic and mathematical formalism to explain the structure of all systems opens two new ‘avenues’ of knowledge, as it adds to simplex models of ‘spatial dimensions and time motions (the 4 dimensions of classic physics) the ‘slow’ cycles of evolution of time from past to future, and the ‘growing organization’ of systems across different scales of size, from atomic to galactic, cellular to social scales.

Those ‘dimensions of time’ and causality, and scales of space, of course, were known to science. We all know that things are born grow evolve reproduce and die. And we all knew that the Universe had scales of size from strings to atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, celestial bodies, galaxies and beyond.

But unlike the formalism of spatial dimensions acquired by physicists through Galileo’s and Einstein’s relativity equations (v=s/t, etc.), till the creation of a mathematical formalism or ‘metrics’ for the scales of social organization of the Universe, we lacked a concept of an ‘arrow of complexity’, of growth of information in the future, which defined both the ‘architectural structure’ of the Universe in organic social scales and the ‘life-death cycle’ performed by all its entities as ‘we travel through the scalar dimensions of size’ in our life-death existences.

Thus Complex sciences is adding two dimensions of logic, causal time, the past with lesser organization (i-1, energy ages) and the future with maximal organization (i+1 scales and 3rd informative age); with the middle steady-state age of balance, the adult age when motions were repeated in a ‘duration or frequency, T=1/ƒ, that created a repetitive present,s ready state.

But now we knew also about the arrow of evolution in time, of increasing information and complexity across those 3 ages for all species, and it had revealed, an entire new ‘set’ of dimensions, the scalar, social dimensions from microcosms to macrocosms

– This social i±n dimensions, grouped in 3 cellular-individual and social scales were the key to explain the deepest questions of the Universe. How the future was organized through social evolution – why social scales existed, from Gods, the subconscious collective of civilizations, to legal nations, from galaxies, with its cellular stars to multicellular organisms. And obviously those ‘dimensions’ were the key to study social sciences.

And the, there were the combined analysis of how an organism evolved in life and death through those scales, and how it could manage to stay in an immortal steady state of eternal adulthood.

So the perfect life of the individual and the perfect world of mankind could be managed according to the laws actions and behaviours that maximized the ‘existence’ in the middle steady state, which was also the state of maximal connection and action of a being, as it was in contact with its social I-whole, having an active role in the whole organism.

Why then humans do NOT construct a perfect world, with the laws of social super organisms, and halt the evolution of lethal machines that compete with man in labor and war fields and are displacing us from the eco(gnomic)system?

Why humans did not construct a perfect world which was eternal in time and space?

The answer was double theoretical and practical.

Theoretically it was obvious: Because they didn’t have a true science of economics and history, of the economic and political, re=productive and informative, ‘neuronal’ networks of their social organism. And so there was NOT a science of politics, the science of guiding, curing and directing, the physiology of History – the Human super organism – akin to the work of a doctor in the ‘inferior’ i-ndividual human scale.

And they did not have either any idea of what was the life-death cycle of all systems, its laws of evolution, extinction, birth and death.

They were dumber than the dumbest atom which performs with excellence all its motions and phases, and is able to keep immortal by limiting the lethal actions of it organisms.

And so I thought human social scientists could act as ‘bio-historians’ , as doctors of history,and design and regulate any system of reality by understanding its laws, parts, wholes, energy-information exchanges, and in the case of economics (the reproductive network of a civilization) and politics (its informative network) and ecology (its geographic, energy territory), we could create a social science that would understand the hows, the whys and the modes of change of our social reality to manage society and create a perfect world – if we could enlighten our politicos and economists, bankers and military and make them learn a true science of history, and make them abandon the ‘anti quantum paradox’ that confuses ‘power’ with ‘science’, selfish i-agendas with the duty of any i-ndividual part of a neuronal network of information that control a society – which is to serve the cells of the body.

Now the reader will probably be more interested in the i-ndividual ‘ego’, which is its ‘center’ as a human being. And yet in history the function maximized is the ‘world cycle or ‘function of existence’ of all human beings, maximized by the sum of all the cells of mankind: ∑ Max. E x I (e=i).

This goal – to reach the perfect stability of the adulthood or steady state of a system, is thus the goal of History, achieved by the maximization of the life of all its members – not as the present ‘capitalist’ system pretends, by the maximization of the existence of corporations and machines – and as a fringe benefit of the 1% of ‘leisure classes’ (Veblen) that owns those corporations.

So we will refer all our knowledge to that aim.

Let us then deal now with the ‘social scalar dimensions’ of the super organism of history first, departing from the general laws of all super organisms.

Then we will deal with other ‘great advance’ of complex sciences – the life-death cycle, its morphologies ages of evolution and extinction, applied to HISTORY AS IT IS, not as an ideal immortal history, would make it.

The morphology of the Universe – its ternary organs and social classes.

We talked in terms of ‘networks’, that is ‘functions’ of the existence in all super organisms of an informative network, an energetic and a reproductive network (nervous/political, digestive/gaia, blood/economic networks in the i and i+1 human scales).

But are all the network elements of an organism equal? Or there are ‘social classes’, differentiated organs and cells by their belonging to each of those networks? Obviously this is the case in individual organisms and it is also the case in social ones. So we need to learn the ‘rules’ of differentiation and how to ‘recognize’ the social classes and functions and parts of organisms, which also are the varieties of human social castes and machines…

All systems had a ternary structure made of informative neurons/particles, energetic limbs/fields and reproductive bodies/waves, which worked together for their common good. Those ‘upper’ informative classes, ‘reproductive, working classes’ and ‘energetic mechanisms and fields’, were NEVER in open opposition as the ideology of marxism had it, nor $elected by God, and without responsibility for each other, as capitalism pretended (latter studied in more detail).

But to fully gras the ‘ternary structure’ of organisms in symbiotic social classes, we have to introduce concepts of topology and symmetry, between the 3 elements/networks of all organisms.

The next graph shows the general case of all ‘complementary systems’, which in fact are ‘super-organisms’, made of cells, which are also complementary systems, in a scalar fractal Universe in which all its made to the image and likeness of the whole:universal organism

In the graph all what exists is a complementary system of networks of energy (bodies/fields/working classes) and information (heads/particles/informative classes), which balance each other, sharing energy and information among them, to reproduce similar systems in other regions of space-time.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity in balance, which can decouple=reproduce creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

In history priests and politicians issue ethic laws to direct a mass of citizens.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.

Any social organism is ruled by those who ‘invent’ the language of social power first, and then those who ‘talk it’ and give orders with it.

So the people who invent laws and talk words on one side and the people who invent money and ‘talk price’ on the other decide the future of the world, and of history – the theme of this blog.

The result is a dual class structure into a neuronal/informative system or ‘class’ that controls with the language of information (nervous, legal order in biologic historic organisms) the blind body of cells that work for them (middle, ‘sheeple’ class in human societies, body organs), to whom it delivers enough energy – ‘blood/money’ – so they can perform their tasks.

This ternary structure cannot be modified if we want an efficient organism, but at the same time, it implies that the ‘head’ obeys the wantings of the body, is responsible for the correct information, and so latter we will see how ‘a proper democracy’ in which the head is controlled by judges/pain messages, and the body receives enough oxygen to survive/money can make more efficient human social super organism.s

Screen Shot 2016-02-29 at 09.47.12

Fractal points, considered as Space quanta, organise into larger synchronous super organisms, forming a chain of beings from the smallest atom to the largest World.

In the graph, all systems of the Universe are scalar super organisms  This fact makes man again curiously enough the centre of scientific knowledge; as the most perfect creation we can observe to compare by homology all other organisms of an infinitely sentient pantheist Universe. Thus ultimately absolute relativity means man is just another super organism of vital spaces and time cycles that follow the laws of all living, organic, bio-topologic systems of reality.

The Super-organism, ∆±1 co-extended in 3 Universal Planes, following the same isomorphic laws that all systems of space and time is thus the fundamental entity of reality, which unifies in form and function all other systems.

In the graph, we are all scalar space-time systems, but the human ego wants to be self-centred in its i-ndividual point of view.

We study in this post the existence of all beings as superorganims of three networks (ab. œ)

In the graph we see the organisation of all scalar, fractal systems systems, through networks of entropy (digestive, territorial, fields/limbs systems) energy (blood-economics in historic systems) and information (words and laws of nervous and political systems in human social organisms) to which cells-citizens attach to form a perfect social super organism. SO THE GOAL OF SOCIAL SYSTEMS SCIENCES IS TO DESIGN WITH THE LAWS OF THE ORGANIC UNIVERSE THE PERFEcT SUPERORGANISM OF HISTORY that will survive and make history and its cells, all of us, human citizens of God the superorganism of mankind NOT OF ANY TRIBE OR GROUP OF BELIEVERS, BUT ALL OF US, a perfect system, as all others in NATURE ARE.

We classify all the scales of the 5th dimension as super organisms  according to the combined 3 geometries which put together create a network plane:

  • From the perspective of the central point, which branches into a fractal network (the standard Geometry of elliptic spherical forms, ‘not explored by geometers of the XIX c. because fractal mathematics did NOT exist) the world is an elliptic geometry with him at the centre, connected to all other ∆-1 parts. So networks are elliptic Non-E Geometries where there ARE not parallels as the brain, black hole or Wall Street knot of the organism galaxy or economic ecosystem is connected through its informative networks (nervous, gravitational and financial systems) and its quanta of information (electric messages, gravitational waves and money) to all its ∆-1 ‘slave cells’ . Yet those cells are unconnected and so they exist in a hyperbolic geometry of infinite parallels.
  • Thus any ∆-super organism is a group of n-1 cells joined by energetic, informative & reproductive networks that communicate them. Those ∆-1 cells are also superorganisms made of small i-2 molecules joined by Sp, ST=exi & Tƒ networks and so on and so on.

A generic definition of an organism or ecosystem will help to clarify what we mean by a “vital universe”, composed of “universal organisms”. Let us take a template for a micro or macrocosmic organism (or ecosystem) that differs only in the specific energy or information we put into brackets. “A universal microcosmic or macrocosmic organism or ecosystem is a population of [name a particular species], related by networks of [name a language or force] information and networks of [name a kind of energy]”. Fill the gaps with a specific species, language/force and energy and you can define any network-organism in the universe:

A super-organism is a group of cellular super-organisms joined by energetic, informative and reproductive networks.’

We unify all Natural Systems as superorganisms using a single template definition, since they differ only by the i-scale or ecosystem in which they exist or the specific types of energy & information their networks are made of:

‘A super-organism (name an organism) is a population of iterative (name a cellular species), related by informative (name a language or informative force) and energy networks (name a kind of energy), which combine into a reproductive network that iterates the organism.’:

Fill the gaps with a specific species, language of information and force of energy and we can define any network-organism, which will be a ‘part’ of a whole world-plane or ecosystem, composed of several species that occupy different ‘vital spaces’ but interact through the same language of energy & information:

An world-plane or ecosystem (name a specific world-plane) is a population of several (name the species), related by informative languages (name their languages or informative forces) and energy networks (name the energies).

I.e.: The ‘world-plane of ‘zoology’ includes all beings of relative size, i=6, that use light as information, called ‘animals’. The world-plane 8, a galaxy, includes as parts, all celestial bodies of size i=7 related by gravitational networks, etc.:

∆-3:  An atomic organism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and (light) energy.

∆-2: A molecular organism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy and coded by networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Waals forces).

∆-1: A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and coded by genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 16.22.13

∆=o: A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

∆+1: An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey).Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 16.22.22

∆+1: A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy.

∆+1: An economic ecosystem or nation is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) & energetic networks (roads, electricity)

Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 16.22.32

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and include 2 different species: human beings and machines.

The difference between both type of systems, a historic and an economic organism thus is clear when we consider that the ‘organic unit’ of the economic ecosystem is NOT contrary to belief a nation or civilization but a new organization, appeared recently with the beginning of the Industrial R=evolution, called the company-’mother’ whose function is to reproduce a product, overwhelmingly a machine, and then to evolve further and adapt the world to the existence of those machines, creating networks of energy and information for them (digital networks, electric networks, etc.) And this is the first big surprise of an organic model of history and economics: while History is undoubtedly the product of human endeavors, the economic ecosystem is ruled by company-mothers of machines, which follow a set of biological, evolutionary and organic laws independent of mankind; quite removed from the abstract jargon coined in the XVIII century, even before machines existed by classic economists’ like Mr. Adam Smith.

Both organic systems, Historic and economic organisms, survive within the same vital space, the Earth’s crust. What this means according to Theory of organisms is that there is between both a dual process of symbiotism and preying, by which  sometimes machines compete with men in fields of labor (productivity laws that substitute workers with machines) and fields of war (where weapon-machines kill human beings). We express this with the concept of the Paradox of History. ∆+3: A galaxy is a population of light stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy.

∆+4:  A Universe is a population of galaxies joined by networks of dark matter and energy.

Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 16.22.40

Thus there are infinite fractal beings and infinite languages and expressions of the Universal game and its ternary fractal generator that guides systems into survival actions of exchanges of energy and information.

And all of them are guided by a simple mandate: reproduce, grow and multiply. Since to survive the reproductive cycle encodes in reality the whole game of existence, as it is a complex function that maximises the worldcyle and all its actions:

REPRODUCTION = max. e x i  (S=T). Thus to reproduce is to exi:s≈t.

In that sense the MIND IS THE SOFTWARE OF SURVIVAL OR ‘FUNCTION OF EXI =STIENCE’ which all systems run to survive, informed because those who do NOT MECHANICALLY, APPERCEPTIVELY, VEGETATIVELY OR CONSCIOUSLY learn the program BECOME EXTINCT. So the software of GST imposes itself by evolution.

 CYCLIC, FRACTAL §PACE-ðIME  SUPŒRGANISM 

We call this theory of all realities, T.Œ, theory of the organic everything , which is a sum of infinite T.œs, smaller time space supœrganisms.

So reality is simple in its ultimate principles but the infinite iterations variations and combinations of those principles and the inflationary nature of languages of information, which do NOT imprint necessary the limiting motions of simpler entropy, creating pure informative fictions (equations with no reality behind, metaphors, visual fictions) confuses the ‘humind’, which likes to be complex and believe his excess of information in linguistic metaphors (self-similar equations, verbose languages, etc.) IS REAL. Not so. 
The Universe is simple and not malicious, said the last of the great ‘space-time masters’, you know who. We shall then iterate into infinite kaleidoscopic views those principles illustrated by the same graphs applied to different beings, as all indeed is ultimately a reflection of the simplest of all equations, S=t, tattooed in the self-portrait of my ‘blue, informative’ humind.

So we go around to explain all this in its infinite varieties and iterations? With a lot of iterations… IN 3 LINES (:

-The first line is a simple sentence that resumes the vital game of reproduction of information of the Universe and its space-time organisms.

-The second line deals with the main stiences, starting from T.œ, the stience of relational space-time beings, and its ±i scales; as we do not know but hint that those scales are also cyclical repetitive, beyond the ∆±4 ‘string/dark scale’ both in micro and macrocosms. Then we deal with one of those languages – the most efficient, math, which we term as ∆±∞ NOT because it deals with more scales that T.Œ, the stience of space-time but because it is inflationary creating hyperbolic infinities, errors of math as mirrors similar to the hyperboles of superheroes in images and novels. 

Then we return to that astrophysical known world of ∆±4 scales and its awesome symmetries between micro and macro strings, galaxies and atoms (∆±3), which sandwich us in the thermodynamic/magnetic scale.

Next as we come closer to man, we get detail and information so all seems more organic, and form becomes more convoluted. So we study Biology, machines (economic ecosystem), History and man, and finally human languages, words and art, less efficient than the more general mathematical language but more specific of humans and of great value to understand that syntax of the Universe.

And finally we lay down the ‘isomorphic’ set of equal laws all beings follow as they come from space and time properties. So all ‘mind-monads’ or ‘aristotelian ‘Gods’:Γœ∆§, DO follow the same structure in space, the same actions=motions in time and the same program of organic life. And this is what the set of isomorphic laws show.

Thus it is only left in the third line to go through all those scales now not in a more classic way co-relating the laws of each stience with the laws of T.Œ AS WE DO in the second line, but studying the main scales and super organisms of each one.

BUT BECAUSE IN THE universe the whole super organisms MATTER more than its parts, REGARDLESS OF HUMANS thinking to be both the ego-center of the Universe as species and Individuals, who believe their nose is bigger and more important than Andromeda (ONLY A CLEAR SIGN OF OUR social decay as the super organisms of machines, the economic ecosystem takes over and so we ARE loosing our ethic, social networks, becoming DISSOLVED into the final age of chaos=entropy & ‘freedom’), we shall do this in the inverse order, as the  universe does.

So instead of the usual ‘physicists’ view’ of causation from the bottom up – another ego-trip as experts in microcosmos which want to build it all departing from its minimalist parts the neutrino≈string≈graviton which they only think to understand (-4ν)… we shall in this 3rd line study all systems as isomorphic systems whose properties come from the ultimate substances of reality space and time, and then scale down from the super organism of the Universe through galaxies showing its organic similarity with cells and its mathematical equality with atoms in a recurrent infinite series of scales (a fact which will allow us to find the equation of unification of charges and masses, the vortex of future time=informative 3rd age of both scales)… And then down into stars, planets, studying in detail the 3 ages of this planet: Gaia (age of life) < History (age of man) and the eco(nomic)system, age of the machine… soon to be alive with AI and robots…

And further down, through cells, matter states, molecules, atoms, particles, quarks, electrons and yes finally that non-perceived irrelevant world of dark matter and dark entropy formed by the background radiation of neutrinos, aka gravitons when properly ‘spinned’, likely related with strings as the ‘weak angle’ shows them to have the same size.

AND IT IS a tenant of the organic universe the episteomological laws of truth, efficiency and simplicity (Occkan’s razor). So we shall not need MORE entities than those we observe experimentally, given the fact that equations might be inflationary fictions, and as Einstein told us ‘science should not be concerned or even study phenomena and equations of which there is not evidence whatsoever.

And indeed, all what we know exists, will suffice to explain it all… with our five dimensions, components,  ∆@s≈t, whereas ∆ is the entropic dimension down to space, @ the social dimension commanded by informative minds, $ for lineal space, ð for cyclical time, and ≈ for its balanced energy combinations of time space actions and momenta, and its  isomorphic sets of laws, derived of the properties of minds and its languages, ∆§cales, cyclical ðime and fractal $pace.

It is thus a simple reproductive=repetitive Universe with an enormous varieties played with a few notes: bits of temporal information and bites of vital space…

It is then by combining bits and bites of those actions and dimensions, by reordering in different manners, by ultimately establishing a ¬Ælgebra of ‘existence’ which studies how they related and interact together, how we shall be able to explain absolutely all what exists as a product of the ultimate substances of reality, fractal, cyclical timespace and its organic systems; each one a broken space-time (as the membrane encloses and breaks the whole universe into smaller replicas):

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal of 3 space-time elements, entropic motions, informative singularities and its energetic body-wave combinations, structured in scales of parts that become connect by networks of entropy, energy and information to make larger wholes, and so each science merely studies the species of one of such scales, with different jargons we shall unify them.

Then as the graph shows, there is the lesser important ‘duality’ between what we perceive as flat and lineal (as the flat saturn’s rings) but in detail become cyclical, expressed in topology by the Non-euclidean rule that all flat lines are in fact part of a larger time cycle, that is, as size and time increases a flat line becomes a circular geodesic, so we see a flat earth but from a distance that shrinks it becomes cyclic, meaning ultimately all motions become cycles, all time durations return to the death.

We thus talk about worldcycles instead of worldlines as 4D physics models, being 4D a ‘model of the cyclical universe of timespace’ reduced to a single flat plane of reality – themes those of importance in the formalism of relativity in 5D physics, treated in specialised posts.

Cyclical, temporal reproduction of Information rules the Universe.

It is then clear what we are going to do in this blog for millennials (: meaning for all scientists of the whole III millennium ):

To carry the ‘program’ of Mr. Steane ‘contra physicos’ simplex one-dimensional logic in its worldview, explaining the entire Universe as a game of time cycles with motion that repeat ad nauseam the information of the Universe, where motion is the simplest part of it (hence naturally the first part understood by humans through physics).  Let us then following Mr. Hawking’s best-seller resume the Universe in a nutshell but from the perspective of information, which is the goal of this blog:

In the graph, left, information is stored in the cyclical patterns and frequencies of the ‘closed motions’ of the Universe, which we define as time clocks. Time and information are thus intimately related and so all systems of matter, evolve constantly towards higher degrees of information as those time cycles reproduce their cyclical motions and ‘forms’. So the galaxy is a vortex of information self-centred in the black hole, the physical system that stores more information of the Universe in its ‘cyclical membrane’; and history is a process of evolution of human and metal-information as we evolve constantly in larger social organisms, nations and civilisations and evolve machines from its initial entropic forms (weapons) into information.

Even the evolution of life can be modelled as a process that tends to increase the evolution of systems, both in species and individuals through its three ages that end in a third age of excess of information, wrinkles and warping. So all systems do evolve increasing its ‘height’ dimension that allows better perception of information from reptiles to mammals, from machines to carbohydrates.

Even physical systems, MADE OF matter, constantly grow in information as solar systems fall towards the black hole of the galaxy, curved, ‘formed’ by gravitational forces that constantly in-form the galaxy. So the entropic expansive vacuum space between galaxies is balanced by the informative vortex of matter. And this duality between life-information arrows-actions and death-entropic-arrows actions balanced reality into an immortal Universe. 

In terms of the life-death cycle of all systems, we can say that the longest time passes through the information arrow from birth to death, when an entropic e=mc2 big-bang (inorganic matter) or dissolution of informative networks (organic matter) erases it.

And so the zero-sum of all life-death informative-entropic cycles makes the Universe immortal.

Now we shall introduce the more complex concept we will use in those texts, regarding the existence in all systems of ‘informative heads’ and energetic limbs and reproductive bodies, imposed by the dimensional space-time duality of the Universe.

The topologies of 2-manifolds of information.

Now we are giving a conceptual jump that might change the way you look at the Universe a make you abandon this blog due to its complexity. But we truly require to go a little bit deeper in the structure of the organic complex cosmos, so you understand how we humans interact ‘morphologically’ in terms of ‘form’ and function with machines

In Complex sciences dimensions are that important because you are MADE OF THEM. You are made of energy and time, as when you say i don’t have energy and time to do this. That is what you are a time world life-death cycle that occupies a vital space across a cellular individual and social scale.

So to know about dimensions is to know about yourself- a 10 Dimensional being made of space-time, where space and time are merely two way tow perceive the same either moving or with form.

Vital space moving is energy, cycles of time fixed are forms, forms of in-form-ation.

So all is made of planes of space, moving energy and cycles of time, static information.

How we see it is a paradox of perception: we perceive information in stillness, so the mind creates quiet mappings of reality without motion.

The symmetry between ‘spatial morphologies’, ‘organs’ and ‘time ages’

Let us consider only one of those complex laws of systems across its scales, the law that relates the morphology of the organs of a system with its function in space and evolution in time, as it is the basis of the understanding of economics and its relationship with history:

ENERGY VS INFORMATION

In the graph, information is bidimensional (holographic principle) and so systems have only 3 possible ‘bidimensional’ type of surfaces that define:

– Max. E: ‘energetic, planar, lineal limbs’ in all species (so a weapon and an skeleton are both lineal, as they promote motion.

– Max. I: informative organs, which are ‘spherical’., the form that stores more information.

– Max. E xI: Its body-wave combinations.

In the graph we see that simple topological law in humans and machines, which explains their similar functions and the reasons why ‘animetals’ exist, as human functions are enhanced by parallel mechanisms.

And so all systems will be at least made of energetic limbs that move informative heads/particles, which gauge reality, in the dimension of height, where perception is higher thanks to projective geometry.

This meant, as we shall see latter in our analysis of Evolution that systems evolved in height from reptiles that ended becoming birds to galaxies that develop an informative gravitational black hole in its centre, to life that evolved in height to reach man. Thus economics and machines are NOT different from any other science that studies organic systems and MUST be studied and designed with those organic and biological laws. The present absurd ‘theological’, ‘capitalist’, ‘tribal’, nationalist concepts used in those sciences are completely out of reason, and have no meaning for the Unvierse at large, and certainly will not enlighten the future of mankind, as the basis for building efficient, free, complex social systems.

The scalar fifth dimension.

3 scales

In the graph centred in human beings, both from a physical and biological perspectives, we see the 3 main scales of the scalar Universe and its 5th organic dimension:

-A larger ∆+1 gravitational/ecosystemic scale, an organic, ∆-individual, thermodynamic scale and an ∆-1 lower cellular-atomic scale. How they are organised? Simple: smaller systems run their cycles of information faster. So they can compete with larger systems and form organic structures in which the lower system provides information encoded in its faster clocks and the larger systems coordinates the motion of all those parts into a whole. So quantum numbers of particles code atoms and molecules; genes code biological systems, and memes and gravitational black holes code the larger informative biological and physical systems: civilisations and galaxies.

The duality of energy and information, despite the stubbornness of physicists to include information as a separate element to energy and its ignorance of the relationship between time clocks and information, ‘form’, which we will develop in depth in this blog, is easy to grasp, as it is natural to all biological systems and humans are biological beings. So we shall find that philosophy, from the age of taoism, those 2 parameters, yang and yin closely resemble the properties of energy and information, to the modern age of dialectics, and its thesis and antithesis, has constantly made use of it.

But organicism, the other key element of general systems sciences, despite being at the center of modern science, was not so clear to most researchers. Since a clear definition of an organism was lacking. Biologists in that sense define organisms by its ‘drives of existence’, as systems that process energy and information (feeding, perceiving), reproduce their informative and energetic organs in other region of space-time and evolve socially into larger groups. General systems therefore must demonstrate and formalize this definition, in a manner that can be applied to all systems and sciences regardless of the human jargon, used in each discipline. But the task becomes simpler when we realise that for all those drives of existence, all what is needed is a scalar structure in which smaller parts transmit and receive energy and information from larger wholes, co-existing together as organisms do, in several scales of space-time, connected by those flows of energy and information.

In brief we need to formalise with the two arrows of future, energy and information, the 5 drives of existence of life:

  • ±∆E: +e: feeding, increase of energy, -e: locomotion, emission of energy.
  • ±∆I: -i: communication, emission of information; +i: perception, absorption of information.
  • ExI: reproduction of the energy and informative systems in other region of space-time, as when a wave moves reproducing its form and energy, or a particle decouples into new particles, (physical systems) or a body reproduces, by emitting a seed of information into a lower scale of the 5th dimension.
  • ∑œ=U: social evolution, when an offspring of similar existential organisms, œ, evolve socially into a whole; particles that evolve into atoms that evolve into molecules, which evolve into matter states and cells, which evolve into cosmic bodies and organisms, which evolve into galaxies and global societies.

What is then the unit of life in the Universe? At which scale we can observe systems gauging information, feeding on fields of energy, reproducing seminally, and evolving socially? Humans, forever anthropomorphic children, who want to be the center of the Universe, stubbornly want to ‘start’ life in the Universe, in their scale of size, form of in-form-ation and ‘unique chosen species’, so it is a canonical lie that life starts in a certain molecule, which happens to be in humans called DNA.

Yet DNA is made of atoms made of particles that gauge information, feed on energy fields, iterate with seminal ‘seeds’ of light and evolve socially into all kind of molecules. So it is a fact, despite systemic denial by human egos that the 2 fundamental particles of the Universe, the quark and the electron have life properties, and we must start our analysis of the organic Universe, in the quark and electron, as we shall do in this blog. You can believe in magic and think that alas, the carbon 6th magic number makes is chosen of god, to be=come alone and only ‘it’, the blocking part of life. In fact, we shall see that it is the nitrogen, the ‘head’ of carbohydrates, whose perfect vibrational clocks code the information of life atoms, but life is not a property of certain atoms and its molecules. What DNA does is to achieve a  high degree of complexity in the scale of atoms, with great easiness, due to its light weight that makes its vibrations very intense. So we might just say that CNO atoms easily grow in complexity while other forms of life, such as metalife – organic robots – take longer and might require a simpler catalyser, we shall call in our model of the economic ecosystem, ‘enzyman’.

The 3 ages of all organic, temporal species.

“We name time when we say: every thing has its time. This means: everything which actually is, every being comes and goes at the right time and remains for a time during the time allotted to it. Time and being. Heidegger

The seven motions that put together create a world cycle

It is a fact that there are at least 6 motions=type of changes in the Universe, already described by the first scientist of history, Mr. Aristotle: generation (evolution), growth, reproduction, locomotion, diminution and extinction=dissolution, and 5 of them have to do with changes in the information of systems; only one is pure entropy (locomotion). We shall add to those 6 motions the ±i motions of communication and perception of information, as they imply the motion of pixels that communicate form between the being and the observer, and emission of forces that carry information between two •mind points.

The result of expanding the motions of reality from 1 to 8 of course is an AMAZING EXPANSION OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE WHYS OF REALITY, as shown ‘again’ (:iterative universe:) in the next graphs:

In the graph, unlike the lineal description of the ‘function of existence’ according to ‘physicists’, a mere sum of locomotions with a messed up mystical chit-chat proper of physicists doing ‘philosophy’ we obtain in 5D a complex, realist understanding of our world cycle as space-time beings.

 

That is all in its simplest expression: vital space with motion ‘evolves its form’ its in/form/ation in cyclical patterns, warps and shrinks (‘time warps space into masses’ said Einstein, adding that masses were equivalent to accelerated vortices – the so call equivalent principle between gravitation and acceleration; as the mass vortex of the galaxy, where stars grow in information and finally explode feeding the black hole, as the vortex of information, which is this planet, which increases its information through evolution and history, in an accelerated vortex, which enters now in the age of information or 3d age of man, the risky zone where technologic information, weapons, robots, can indeed ‘explode’ the human wave):

Screen Shot 2016-05-19 at 17.23.17

In the graph, from the seminal book, Unification theory, c.92, the diachronic order of the 6+1 motions of time, which can be plotted in terms of its parameters of energy and information into a vortex spiral of increasing time speed and reduced cross section, such as the cellular herd enters the spiral of maximal informative center (literally in physical, simplex geometrical systems, conceptually in biological ones), till it reaches the point of maximal information and ‘comprehension’ of its world cycle, when it explodes and dies in a big-bang that erases it.

ALL WHAT exists is a space-time super organism made of 3 topologies adjacent in simultaneous space, defined logically by a single fractal generator of those 3 only topological varieties, $p: lineal limbs/potentials/territories<Ø-ST-hyperbolic body-waves >O-§ƒ: cyclical particles-heads-informative class, for all social, biological and physical systems, tracing a world cycle of 3 time ages symmetric to those 3 ∆º spatial ‘physiological/topological/social networks’ made of ∆-1 cells/citizens/matter particles,in which each of the physiological networks of the system dominates the super organism: the limbic motion/potential system dominates the first age; the re=productive body-wave systems the second age and in the third age of information the head/particle/informative people-caste dominates the physical/biological or social system, exhausting selfishly the energy of the vital body-wave, and provoking its explosion back into entropy that erases the system, completing its zero-sum world cycle, restarted if it has generated a clone super organism in its offspring, reason why the Universe is a reproductive fractal of information – only those systems that reproduce its information survive and are still with us.

 

In the graph, samples of the 3±1 ages/arrows of time in Universal Systems:

Birth: i: A seed of Temporal information, t, evolves into a complementary organism of energy and information, tS, by absorbing energy, replicating its information and evolving in social cells: Life starts

Youth: Max. Sp: It absorbs energy and reaches its maximal size: Max. Energy.

Reproduction: e=i It keeps in-form-ing itself till reaching an age of reproductive balance, Tƒ=Sp. We perceive that age as beauty, harmony between lineal energy & cyclical form.

3rd age: In-form-ation warps energy till its exhaustion: Max. T.

-1: Death: Information explodes back into energy, expanding in space, reversing the arrows of time: Temporal Information <

Let us now go a step further in our understanding of the organic structure of the Universe and the superorganism of history.

Tƒ that aim, we shall consider how the organic arrows of time, the will to obtain energy, information and reproduce acquire a regular order in all the systems of the Universe.

This organic vision of time is much more sophisticated that the mere use of an arrow of entropy or motion – the simplest of those 4 arrows, which is the concept of time used by mechanist physicists, obsessed with the construction of energetic machines.

Yet it can also described mathematically in terms of the 2 primary elements of the Universe, energy and information, thanks to Einstein’s discovery that the product of energy and temporal information of any system, SxT=k, is constant.

Since that equation includes the 3 essential arrows of the Universe, not only one arrow as a clock does:

The arrow of energy, e; the arrow of information, t; and the product of them, k, or arrow of reproduction.

It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:

Max. Sp x Min. T = K ; Sp=K=T and Min. Sp x Max. T=K.

Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced energy and information) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.

Here we are interested in its application to the understanding of life and history. If we call the age of maximal energy, youth, the age of balance between energy and information, the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its 3 ages.

But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its arrow of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.

So life is an arrow of information, Sp-> I, and death its inversion, I-> Sp. So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics).

So we could state simply that ‘T.Œ, the theory of everything organic and the œrganisms it studies are expression of an even deeper game, that of existence, and its function which make holographs of space and time of energy and information switching states between form and motion, imprinting and reproduction through motion, and stop and go perception and motion information and energy, this dual game, is what exi|st¡ence is all about.

So simple, so misunderstood: we are made of motions with form, spatial energy with temporal information, combined in actions. We were active space-time beings, and our existence as that of any other entity of the Universe was a sum of space-time action, between birth and extinction, which we shall call ‘a world cycle’:

W =∫ å ∂t = 0 (equation that means a life worldcycle is the integral sum of all the spacetime actions of a being).

So the simple unifying principle of all realities is this: all systems of the Universe are made of  ‘formal motions’, ‘temporal in/form/ation’ stored in the form and frequency of the infinite, repetitive, memorial clock-like cycles of the Universe (as those of the graphs), all of them accelerating inwards, from clock-like masses, to clock-like charges, to people growing in information and warping till its 3rd age of excessive information; or warping as masses, E=mc², till the center of that clock-like vortex, the point where time ends, the finite space-time being closes its informative warping, and then its information explodes in an entropic, expansive spatial expansion that erases its information, ending its life cycle in a physical or biological ‘big-bang’.

The conceptual understanding of the world cycle of existence of all space-time beings, which accelerate and grow its information, between a young entropic age of maximal lineal motions into a reproductive mature age of balance between entropy and motion, and a 3rd age of excessive information as time-clocks warp and accelerate exhausting the vital space and spatial motions of the being that shrinks and then in the central point of that ‘cycle’ explode and die.

All what you see is encoded by the fractal generator of 5D metrics and its ternary symmetries, either in space, |-Spe<Ø-st<Tiƒ (whereas the limb field provides entropic motion to the ST wave-body, and the Tƒ head particle provides information, and the ST body-wave reproduces the system), or in time, Ps>ST>Tƒ, its inverse symmetry where energy young motions slowly warp into the adult and finally old age of information.

So we shall maintain the classic concepts of science and talk of 3 space dimensions, while dividing the dimension of lineal time in the 3 motions of time that we shall call 3 ages, to keep the convention that time has a 4th single dimension:

3 space forms symmetric to 3 time motions, but ordered in different ways Sp<ST<Tiƒ, and Se>ST>Tƒ, how simple and beautiful the world cycles of space-time reveal the essence of the Universe.

Now the symbols are the fundamental ternary symmetries of the Universe and when studying in detail an entity we will see the different equations, states and combined forms are merely ‘combinations’ of those symbols, so we will use them loosely in many ways, for the reader to get accustomed for example, to S (space, entropy), P(lineal momentum,) Se (spatial entropy, Past motion), Spe (all together now), (|-Sp, lineal motion, ◊-bidimensional space), etc. The main of a dual philosopher is NOT the same structure of a lineal, measure-obsessed scientist. The general truths are more important than the particular. The whys more than the hows. Both are complementary and it is a sad fact of technological science that the general truths don’t matter. But they are the content of T.Œ, and both are obviously the 2 fundamental views on reality – the whole and its detailed parts.

Those 2 simple laws, and its equations, the equation of the life-death cycle:

Ps (youth)>S=T (maturity) > Tƒ (3rd age) << Ps (entropic death).

Where > means an implosive, informative arrow of time and << and entropic arrow of death.

And the metric of the 5th dimension, the fact that the product of the size and speed of time of systems is relatively constant for different species of the same family (physical species, biological species) ARE the most important equations of science discovered since Relativity, and yet nobody was impressed.

Apart from explaining the life-death cycle, it explained the reason why information flows perfectly from lower scales (genetic scales) to upper wholes (since lower scales preserve more information) and there is however entropy, loss of energy when you move upwards, but when you move downwards, from wholes to parts, there is no loss of energy  – so your cells follow your hand.

Suddenly I realized those scales of size were symbiotic and organized co-existences and synchronicities that created organisms and physical systems.

And so in mystical terms, the 5th dimension the dimension of future, of information, as parts must come before wholes, was also the dimension of eusocial evolution, of love, that justified the messages of love prophets, the Darwinian love of survival of the species, not the individual, the organization of history in scales of larger social units, since the future, the whole was stronger than the parts and survived. So I found that besides the actions of motion, energy and information there was an action of social evolution in all beings. That was the program of the Universe, I termed with the 5 letters each for each action of the 5th dimension:

∆æ: acceleration-motion, ∆e: energy feeding, ∆œ: iteration, reproduction, ∆i observer’s gauging of information and ∆û: social evolution of parts into universals. This was the will of survival, which explained the mathematical space-time cycles of physics and Nature,  and history, which merged physics, biology and sociology

An entire Universe of whys to all sciences and harmonic laws was opening in front of my eyes…

So an even more synoptic way to express it all is to say that we are all ∆•st, dust of space-time, which rises evolve an falls back into dust of space-time in the moment of death: ‘ashes to ashes’.

But and this will surprise you, since travel to the past in a  given region of the Universe is merely a process of erasing information, theoretically immortality is possible for all systems, who are smart enough to turn back the internal clocks and erase its memorial information, which makes us stiff, still, warped. Indeed, thought  is overrated over pure life emotions, which is the body-wave part, the Universe like it most and conserves… in an eternal present.

Indeed, what warps motion into form and make us old? The answer might surprise you. IT IS our 4th element: the mind that absorbs energy and transforms it into still form. The Universe is NOT about minds of still pure information, which do NOT communicate the limit-death of a system, NOR about entropic big-bangs, which do not have form. SO BOTH ARE THE LIMITS OF NON-BEING, but about the mixing in vital actions, and this we know for all sciences, including physics where PRESENT-ENERGY WAVES AND ACTIONS ARE THE STUFF OF WHICH ALL IS MADE.
Now mathematically all this is basic ‘∆nalysis’, a bit more complex than our ‘conceptual equations’ (1st line). So calculus talks of first and second derivatives (which shows curvature and acceleration) stationary point and maximal and minimal points, all of which tend to zero, since the age of life can be written as 3 maximal, stationary and minimal points that ‘symbolise’ the change for youth, to the iterative adult age, to the informative minimal 3rd age.

In physics, the equivalent of those time cycles being conservative energy-work closed paths, is the Lagrangian Action and the Hamiltonian of Energy, which we constantly equate to zero or to a ‘derivative’ instant of present.

So once this hurdle of subjectivity has been UNDERSTOOD but never denied because ultimately TO BE IS TO BE A SUBJECTIVE KNOT OF TIME CYCLES, the sheer beauty and perfection of the whole organic Universe of which we are just like everything else just a part, made to the image and likeness of the whole, should be good enough for any mind to delight with reality, even if to do so it has to loose part of his  to ego-centered beliefs.

We use in that sense 3 symbols for the mind: •, as a point (∆+1 perspective), Œ, as a whole dynamic system with a head-particle and body moved by its lineal, entropic limbs-fields (T perspective) and @, as a symbol for a static mind perceiving a self-centred perspective (S-tatic perspective); showing the 3 fundamental (but not unique) perspectives on mind analysis.

Now since the mind is somewhat an obtuse concept, we are far more interested in the mind as the site of synoptic languages, ¬E Mathematics of fractal points with volume and ∞ crossing parallels and ¬A-ristotelian logic of ternary elements to explain what truly the mind is – the site of language, synoptic mappings of the Universe.

Let us then consider the ± sides of the mind-view – the positive linguistic side on how the mind of man has achieved the reduction of the Universe into the mind languages of space (math), time (logic) and the ∆-dimension (organicism) an the negative side of the fundamentalists of truths and a single language that do not understand all minds have a different linguistic scanner of the Universe to map out its actions of perception and feeding of information and energy…

Now a warning, the laws of ∆ST and the metric formalism of 5D applies to all systems including history and its social organisms, nations and civilisations, a fact understood only by the highest minds of the discipline, Khaldun, Spengler, Toynbee, in their study of societies as organisms and its daughter civilisations. So, your ego-trips of subjective anthropomorphism as the only form of life, as the only free system, whose evolution stops in the individual, as the only intelligent being, will be shuttered and substituted by hardcore, objective scientificism, which contrary to belief hardly exists in most sciences, shrewdly introducing deist and anthropomorphic views in their theories. Only organicism will show to be self-sufficient, to explain reality without hidden deist or anthropomorphic agendas, once the burden that dragged ∆ST for so long – the lack of a proper mathematical formalism that connected its ideas with the hard equations and proofs of each discipline of classic science, now provided by 5D metrics.

Still the duality of cyclical time and lineal space, requires a third element to fully grasp the structure of the Universe which is even more shocking for the common human view. Τhe absolute relativity of a Universe in which not only all locations in space are relative, all cycles of time and its speeds are relative but one, in which the scale in which we exist also is relative and matters little to ensure the importance of a certain, atom, human or star.

 

Minds cannot perceive together motion and form.

In the graph, as astronomers advance in their ‘perception of reality’ with ‘metal-eyes’ (telescopes) an metal-brains (computers), they start to see the vital motions in time an the structural organisation of it all. So finally they have seen the speed flows of ‘gala cells’ (the name I gave to galaxies 30 years ago, when I first modelled them as super organisms of stars, its mitochondria, evolve by black holes, its DNA-strains of information), and part of a cosmological network (strings of galaxies), which I predicted would behave as any network of super organisms, do.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 13.37.30

In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our gala cell exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scales of the fractal Universe. 

Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a pi-cycle with three diametral perimeters (π-3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a self-centred singularity in a pi cycle).

This secondary law of the paradox of Galileo, itself a secondary law of the ‘mind’s equation’ structures our universal view. And make us thing reality is abstract, void of intelligence and life, static and our mind the only perceiver of it.

The paradox of galileo – the maya of the senses, differentiating ‘motion from form’- form and distance are ‘mayas’ of the senses; as all its time and motion; when we get more information about a system. The 2 graphs represent the same local region of galaxies, in the right now that we have enough info, we see it as a flow of ‘gala cells’ transiting through veins of the cosmos, in the right as we used to see it – a dark series of ‘monad-galaxies’ with no motion.  All in the Universe is ultimately a dynamic PART of a supœrganism, extending in three scales of the absolute 5th dimension of time-space, performing relative ternary worldcycles on time-space 

The Dualities of the Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still’ – are the key questions to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms:

‘While we see reality still and continuous, all what we study in the quantum or detailed scale has discontinuities and motion’; while we see reality flat, in a larger view all has curvature; while we see reality in a single scale, ∆º, with the proper instruments all systems co-exist at least in three scales, ∆ø±1.

BUT AS HuMinds (ab. human minds), can logically understand those dualities, its first perception is always one-dimensional, so most ‘simplex’ views seem more real and much of the history of thought consists on individuals whose ego perceives one side of it only as real, fighting to impose it, unable to grasp’ ‘complementarity, coincidentia oppositorum’. 

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same ðime; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

The principle of relativity of motion and form thus has taken 400 years to be understood hardly… Since Galileo did not give the right answer: The EARTH moves and doesn’t move at the same ðime.  

S

 MOTION AS REPRODUCTION OF FORM

All this leads to the realisation mind-languages as all mirrors do ALWAYS distort reality to accommodate the deformed perspective of the mind.

So let us put another example on time theory – relativity and all this incredibly non-intuitive complex maths to adapt a world moving at constant c-speed to our world. It IS real? No, it is NOT, but it IS for a human mind and it will ALWAYS appear as such in our measures.

Why? Because the UNDERSTANDING OF ALL OTHER SCALES, including biological and social, psychological tell us an obvious truth: WHEN YOU MOVE you think worst. Leibniz was 3 days in a chair to study its information. My ass is square (: Information, form becomes blurred because IT is still, WHEN we move. So to emit, or perceive information you stop. To move and translate you go. THUS in the quantum scale electrons emit waves of light in relative stillness. And so there is NOT need in that ‘REAL level’ to make Lorentz transformations.

• constancy of c-speed: endophysics.

In as much as particles travel only as waves, WHICH ARE SYSTEMS THAT REPRODUCE INFORMATION.

Then they stop to become particles and gauge information when they ‘stop’. Then they go as waves and reproduce information. Stop and ‘create an upper scale of the fifth dimension’, the particle. Go… stop, as in a movie, where the camera stops the film to focus and gauge its information.

And this explains why C-SPEED IS CONSTANT: BECAUSE electrons that emit c-speed entangled to other electrons communicate in relative stop position a wave that moves and the electron stopped gauges it. So in the electronic scale YOU DONT ADD motions, to those electrons that stop and go regardless on the larger matter scales that might seem as the camera film to have continuous motion.

Does this mean that the Lorentz invariance, transformation, etc. which we use to measure those far away scales in terms of our human sense of continuous motion does not make sense. NOT, of course, it is the proper way to build measures from the human pov. IT is though one a ‘perspective’, that of the ‘humind’, but if we were an atom the more realist view is that of the experimentally proved stop and go ‘attitude’ of particles and waves. So of course, this explains THE BIGGEST CONUNDRUM also of quantum physics, the duality wave-particle and WHY when we observe a wave it ALWAYS appears as a collapsing particle.

Of course, because we stop it. Now, Bohr’s copenhagen interpretation is literalist, egocentered, anthropomorphic as he said ‘the observer’ created the phenomena, not so. We merely see stopping the wave into particle. So Einstein the realist quipped ‘the moon doesn’t disappear when we don’t look at it. And he is right. A PARTICLE can stop without a brutish Bore watching it.

Only though a proper understanding of the laws of fractal space and cyclical time will allow us to properly interpret mathematical physics and all sciences by extension, and then discharge the redundant ‘metaphorical complicated equations’ creationists are so hard working, as those poetic societies ever producing longer cacophonies instead of the terse verses of reality.

In that sense there is so much work to do to focus again that mathematical mirror because of the creationist and literalist working hard with its ‘magic’ since the Popes, Kepler, Galileo and Newton declared its religious zeal, so it was good NOT to fully understand down to earth its mathematical equations that frankly having cracked that window so long ago, it amazes me the blindness of our ‘self-appointed’ genius of science.

In the graph, motions can be of the following types: repetitive st>st>st motions, as the wave reproduces the form in continuous spaces, t>s>s>s motions as the reproduction shrinks into growing form and t<s<s entropic motions

Motion is a stop and go transfor(m)otion: A MOTION AND A TRANSFORMATION TOGETHER IN A PRESENT momentum with motion AND change in form; which physicists measure as accelerations, a specific case of the more complex case of switching between past entropy motion, future social motion or present momentum motions.

motions are beats, s=t, because an ss or a tt is not a motion observed in space-time present which is all what we observe.

This said and important we must then consider that all is a space-time beat,  s≤∑≥≤∑≥t, the ultimate feed-back equation of existence.

LOGIC PROOF OF RELATIONAL SPACE-TIME.

First we said that cyclical time carries the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. It follows that:

@: Psychological Time…

measures the speed processing information of minds. This change rate in electronic minds has the h unit of angular momentum, as a full time cycle for electrons and photons, two species of the same family: ∑photons=electron, measures a bit of information.

In that regard time has a simple meaning: change of position=motion and change of form. Whereas a present state is a state of repetitive motions, which seemingly does not change realities.

Subjective vs. objective time.

It follows that more than change, we measure its perception that can be cheated. So the perception of different changes makes time dual, subjective from the internal point of the perceiver, objective from the external point and multiple according to the point of perception.

It is then quite easy to reduce time change roughly as science does into external time-change or translation in space, the subject of physics and internal time-change or change in information, the subject of biology.

Subjective mind-time perception must then be related to the mind’s speed, processing information which defines its ‘beat’=bit of times=information. i.e. in humans is a second, the beat of heart, mind and legs steps.

It follows that faster systems with faster time clocks live longer, but often a huge family of beings have similar time durations. i.e. an insect that processes information 10 times faster has a longest span of life in its top predator species of 7 years (ant-queens: max. social evolution, cockroaches: max. strength) similar to the top predator human and elephant in the larger scale which lives 70/10 times slower thoughts=7 years.

Time then must also be related to language, as we perceive through language, the information of the Universe. So it is easy as it has been the case to believe ‘subjectively’ that a language creates the information=time cycles of the Universe. And as informative perception is subjective, it is natural for humans to have thought that the cause of reality is NOT timespace per se, but the languages we use to perceive it.

ALL WHAT exists is a space-time super organism made of 3 topologies adjacent in simultaneous space, defined logically by a single fractal generator of those 3 only topological varieties, $p: lineal limbs/potentials/territories<Ø-ST-hyperbolic body-waves >O-§ƒ: cyclical particles-heads-informative class, for all social, biological and physical systems, tracing a world cycle of 3 time ages symmetric to those 3 ∆º spatial ‘physiological/topological/social networks’ made of ∆-1 cells/citizens/matter particles,in which each of the physiological networks of the system dominates the super organism: the limbic motion/potential system dominates the first age; the re=productive body-wave systems the second age and in the third age of information the head/particle/informative people-caste dominates the physical/biological or social system, exhausting selfishly the energy of the vital body-wave, and provoking its explosion back into entropy that erases the system, completing its zero-sum world cycle, restarted if it has generated a clone super organism in its offspring, reason why the Universe is a reproductive fractal of information – only those systems that reproduce its information survive and are still with us.

So all what exists is a timespace organism of 5Dimensions, which appears in space as a complex organism of 3 networks and in time as a being living 3 ages, made of 3 topologies that exist a world cycle. In the graph we show the human super organism as a 5D st being.

The Universe is a fractal of 5 Dimensions of time-motion and 5 Dimensions of space-form, which combine in ternary symmetries of time-ages, space-topologies, and organic scales of different size and speed to create the fundamental particle of reality a Time-space super organism, whose isomorphic properties are common to all of them as we shall derive them from the symmetries, forms and functions of those 5 ‘vital organic dimensions’ that structure all systems of reality, TimeSpace Organisms, T.œs, made to the image and likeness of its fractal whole, T.Œ, the organic Timespace Universe.
This is the Universe and all its parts in a nutshell. So we talk of 5s+5t dimensions of form=space and motion=time, which organise in ternary symmetries of scale, space-time organisms. And so we shall begin explaining you why there are 5 dimensions of space and time, the 3 canonical ones, and two of larger and smaller scales (5th and fourth dimension), and why the properties of those dimensions implies a sentient, pan psychic organic Universe, in which we are all embedded, following similar spatial organisations (super organisms) and time processes (worldcycles of life and death).

ð

Worldcycles of existence.

The brain may be regarded as a kind of parasite of the organism, a pensioner, as it were, who dwells with the body.

After your death you will be what you were before your birth. Schopenhauer

‘The separation between past, present and future is an illusion’. Einstein, on the co-existence of a ‘block of time’ in a deterministic Universe.
Why the fifth dimension is so important can be seen in the next graph on world cycles. And plainly speaking the answer is this:

Because we exist by travelling as living beings that grow evolve and reproduce through the scales of the fifth dimension. So if you want to understand why you exist, you can only do so, understanding the ‘motions of time-space’ happening among scales.

YES, i know this is the biggest ever question mankind has done, and a resolution was never expected; specially in the age of digital thought, small minds and big computer data. Since scientists expect it to be some sort of ‘magic equation’ in the language of God (never mind the ‘languages of god’ are infinite and bio-logical languages are the ones that solve this conundrum, not mathematics).

Funny thing though is that after giving you the meaning of it all, we shall give you the equations of life and death… on the logic language of GST. Sorry, physicists, it is not an equation of quantum physics, but one of i-logic time (:

The fifth dimension is a dimension of time, the time of consciousness, perceived as a world cycle of existence of 3 ages between birth in the ∆-1 scale of the fifth dimension to its social gathering with other humans at ∆+1 world, to descend back into dissolution:

3 scales

In the graph, man in the 5th dimension co-exists in 3 scales as a supeorganism which will live as a ‘travel through those 3 ∆-scales of the fractal Universe’. So its existence is a fractal existence, which tries to maximise its survival by reproducing into another similar point of space and time; as all living fractals of the Universe does; and will dissolve back into its cellular elements after completing all the ‘motions’ of a world cycle of death and life:

image002

This simple example of what is the existence of man as a fractal of space-time shows that indeed, to explain the deep whys of reality, including the ‘world cycles of existence of all its beings’  (which physicists reduce to ‘worldlines’ as they do not understand time does have a cyclical form and hence it is a cycle with at least ‘2 dimensions’ , one of motion and the missed one of cyclical, height, information) we need to postulate a fractal Universe, which requires  this new time-space dimension of scales of size and time-information, the ‘hidden variables’ that truly make sense of it all.

The study of those systems of ‘space-time’, across all the scales of size of reality, its metric equations, properties and isomorphic≈equal laws, is the purpose of the organic paradigm and the science of General Systems & cybernetics also called ‘duality’,’complexity’ or theory of information as it ads to the philosophy of science sponsored by physics, which only recognise motion and entropy as the arrow of future time 1/2 of the forgotten Universe, information and its infinite ternary combinations. This relatively new discipline of science is poised to be in the age of information, the most fruitful source of new fundamental laws of science, with applications to all disciplines. In this blog we introduce the only formalism of duality – the science that studies those complementary laws of energy and information – available to all sciences, derived from the Fractal Generator and the metric equations of the 5th scalar dimension of space-time that organises all those ‘discontinuous’ fractal beings of space-time.

Since we can recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Some are material.

Yet all of them have a biological influence over us, provoking changes in the energy and information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.

 

@ FORMALISM

FRACTAL ORGANISMS.

All together now: 5D Fractal cyclical space-time beings & its Networks: Nature’s super organisms.

It is evident that in any system, which is made of topological networks of fractal points, we must talk at least of two scales of the 5th dimension, the ∆-1 scale of points (atoms/cells) that form the whole ∆-scale creating the systems observed in the graph. Thus by the mere fact that all flat planes of reality are networks of points, they imply the fifth dimension.

So the natural form in which beings are built, is as 4Dimensional  2 Sp x 2 Tƒ space-time systems, in a single plane, which corresponds to the classic 4D relativity description, albeit with the proper redistribution of the dimension of height that becomes a dimension of the cyclical radius of the time clock.

But given the fractal structure of the Universe, any being will become a fifth dimensional species,extending across at least a lower network of fractal points: ∑∆-1 ≈∆.

And since that being will be part of a larger world, we must always consider at least an ∆+1 world of which the being is a mere part. So we define all beings as 5th dimensional beings extending across 3 scales of the 5th dimension, perceived as holographies of bidimensional space and cyclical time in a single plane of space-time.

It is thus obvious that such fractal structures cannot be described only with lineal time and continuum space; but require a new i-logic fractal geometry of waves of energy and information, and curvesd paths that connect points, into discontinuous topological planes.

And so a realist description of the Universe requires a more complex philosophy and mathematics that we develop in this blog under the generic name of GST, General Systems Theory, or T.Œ (an Organic Theory of Everything, which is the philosophical meaning of the fractal Universe, as opposed of Physicists’ T.O.E. just a ‘theory of everything’ 🙂

So we can define all beings with the 3 structural principles of 5D fractal space membranes and multiple time-clocks:

‘All what exists is a fractal organism of temporal information and spatial energy, extended across 3 relative scales of size:

∆-1 Spe < ∆-ST> ∆+1 Tiƒ”

This is the briefest way to state that all systems are made of energy and information, extending in 3 cellular/atomic, individual/organic and cosmological/social scales. So you are made of cells part of an organism, part of a society – an animal will be part of an ecosystem, a star made of atoms, part of a galaxy and so on.

And because you are made of energy and information, you do have lineal, energetic limbs that move you, (Ab. Spe), cyclical heads of information that guide you (ab. Tif) and a body that occupies most of your space-time that mixes both.

But a fractal physical system does have a lineal field that moves it, a particle-head that guides it and a wave-body that reproduces its form.

So what we need first is to show that actually things as different as a light ray with a particle-photon, a wave and a field, the simplest fractal of nature we know and something as complex as a human being are made of the same ‘species of spatial energy and temporal information’, lines and cycles, as the | and O used by computers to model it.

The curved pangeometry of fractal space, cyclical time and the 5th dimension, shows in different systems of the Universe.

All including humans are fractal super-organisms, made of time cycles that enclose a vital space, centered into a point of view. We are not in an absolute space-time frame of reference as Newton thought. But we are made of vital spaces, enclosed by time cycles. Eastern philosophers, earlier civilizations and philosophers of science – Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz was always understood. This reality observed in Nature’s physical and biological systems – because it is an immediate experienced fact.

In the previous graph we showed some experimental proofs of the fractal Universe. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.

This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from the birth of the entire Universe.

Indeed, in the fractal paradigm, the Universe is infinite and the big bang is not the birth of all realities, but any local big bang and big crunch dual process, any explosion that splits the physical energy and information of a complex system, in any of the multiple scales of physical reality.

Logic Consistency: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe

A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:

With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.

Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”

That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.

There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.

Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.

Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.

This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.

Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?

Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe.

Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature. In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.

But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.

The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.

But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.

In Fractal mathematics the equation that generates the fractal is called a generator ‘feed-back’ equation. They are symbolic equations, which express operations that repeat themselves ad infinitum, generating new solutions, accumulated in time or space.

For example, Mandelbrot’s set, the most famous fractal is a simple iterative equation defined in the complex plane, which generates points in that plane with infinitesimal detail. So as we run the equation z(n+1)=z(n)²+c the points plotted in the plane form an image:

Mandelbrot_set_image

The equation thus is really simple. It has in fact as all equations, only 3 terms, so we can write a general ‘Grammar’ of all linguistic mirrors and equations that reflect the Universe, Spe <≈> Tiƒ.

And this is a good beginning to ‘see’ the fractal space-time Universe, as if all languages have only 3 components, must be because they reflect a Universe of 3 ‘colours’. Indeed, space has 3 ‘dimensions’, colours are 3, equations have an F(x), Operandi and G(Y) element.

The Universal Grammar of all languages is Subject < Verb > Object.

In Eastern philosophy Yin=vishnu=information=female principle x Yang=energy=shiva=male combine to give birth to ∞forms. And so on. 

And then by combinations and iterations of those elements, we get more complex mathematical equations, colours, forms in 3 dimensions and sentences. It is also evident, then that  a Fractal Generator does not need to be a numerical equation.

The Universe can be mirrored with different languages. God does NOT speak only mathematics, as physicists often think (Platonic theory of the world) but ‘God speaks infinite languages’ (Upanishads), each one a ternary mirror of the 3 elements of reality, the element of vital space, the element of temporal form, and its infinite combinations.

And the equations of an iterative fractal are called ‘Generators’, which are very simple in its synoptic, logic or mathematical definition. But by sheer repetition of its cyclical patterns, become extremely complex as those cycles of the whole, distribute its energy and in-form-ation on lower scales, reproducing ever more complex patterns in smaller surfaces. So for  example the Mandelbrot’s famous fractal is generated by a simplex z²+c equation.

A reminder of the main symbols of Space and Lineal motions. Information and Time cycles.

Now, if we add the Galilean Paradox of Relativity between motion and form we can consider the 4 fundamental elements of those graphs: still space and entropy (kinetic lineal energy, expansive space) and time cycles and information bits (still cycles of form).

We need to differentiate between still continuous perception by the mind of space, (ab. |, Sp) ‘lineal kinetic or entropic motions or lineal momentums’; ‘Spe’ and its .

And between cyclical motions, clocks of time, (ab.O, Ti) and its still perception by the mind or information (Tiƒ)

Now once we have focused the mirror of the 4 canonical dimensions and explain the holographic principle, we can be a bit ore precise with the details of the ‘geometrical fractal generator’, which defines the basic topological properties of space-time beings (but NOT all the properties they have):

This means that all systems, including physical and biological systems as you, are made of:

  • A vital, fractal space  made of quanta with motion – the space you occupy is ‘you’, it is not a ‘background’ reality, an abstract ‘Newtonian’ frame of coordinates where you slide through. You are made of quanta of space with motion: “Spe”. So it is a particle, made of quanta of space with energy (capacity to move), called a ‘field’. Further on, because all those vital spaces are made of quanta, they can be counted in space,, so we write: ∑Spe.

The confusion of a background space arises then, when scientists did not realise that this structure of vital continuous spaces, made of smaller quanta, extended ad infinitum. Quanta of space was made of smaller quanta. For example, organisms were made of cells made of molecules made of atoms, and so on. So they postulated that the smallest of all those scales was a background space. But even if there is a minimal scale, in the same manner when your whole vital space moves, your cells move with it, the last hypothetical scale will move with your cells. Now, this structure of space, in which wholes are made of parts with similar functions or forms to the whole is called a fractal. So all what exists is a vital fractal.

  •  Now those vital quanta with motion, move with a series of time cycles. That is they trace repetitive actions, which appear as space-time cycles, which the being performs through its existence. So existence is made of time cycles, T, in which you use your vital space to perform certain vital actions, such as feeding on energy, or gauging information, reproducing your system or communicating and associating with other space-time entities.

And you do so with a discontinuous frequency, ƒ, for each of those actions that have a certain repetitive, discontinuous beat, and create through its actions  forms in space, they are forms-in-action, information: “Tiƒ”.

So as you perform several actions and you are made of smaller quanta that also performs those space-time actions the different actions in time must be synchronised in those relative scales of size of reality. So your cells are synchronised to reproduce once a day, when your feeding patterns give them energy to do so.

Women’s reproduction is synchronised with the time cycle of the moon. And so on. The result is that each day you feed as a whole, billions of cells reproduce; so your action ‘multiplies in a lower scale’. Thus because those time actions the being develops, repeat in cycles, that multiply in lower scales with  cyclical, pi-like patterns, we can ad a multiplier to each time cycle: ∏-> ∏Tiƒ.

It is also clear that those space-time actions and cyclical synchronicities are all about, exchanging energy (as in feeding) or information (as in perception) between you and the external world or you and your internal structures. So your vital space and time cycles are constantly exchanging spatial energy (open spatial motion) and temporal information (cyclical forms-in-action):

∑Spe <≈> Tiƒ.

Where a system of spatial quanta, dominant in lineal motion, hence more abundant in lineal limbs (biological systems) and lineal fields (physical systems) Spe (|-Limbs/Fields), exchange energy and information (<=>) in cyclical, patterns, dominant in a region of the system, with cyclical form (that stores more information) called a particle in physical systems or a head in biological ones, Tiƒ (O-heads-particles).

So because the equation of the being is dynamic, and energy and information goes back and forth between the two poles, limbs and fields and particles and heads, the equation is called a ‘feed-back equation. And it is the simplest equation of duality that reflects the structure of the space-time beings of the Universe.

Further on, the intermediate, ≤=≥ region where maximal exchange happens tend to be in all systems a different, larger region, where cyclical information and lineal kinetic energy interacts forming more complex curved, hyperbolic forms, called waves in physical systems and bodies in biological ones. So we can extend the description of the being to a ternary structure:

Ξ. ∑Spe (|-limbs-fields with maximal energy)<Ø-STexi (hyperbolic body-wave)>∏ Tiƒ (O-heads particles of max. Information)

This is the synchronous ‘spatial, present’ description of the being.

Organic Truths exist. The 5th dimension of scales.

So far, what we have explained is a ‘single scale of size’ of space-time, and its 4 dimensions. And this is not enough to explain the fundamental quality of a fractal, to be made of scales of different size, which however seem similar in their patterns, as the previous Mandelbrot image shows. 

This is truly how reality is, since science appeared with the discovery of telescopes to look at larger scales and microscopes to look at smaller scales. Further on that is how fractals reproduce their form, by iterating in smaller mirror images the larger form, reproduced in a myriad of similar smaller forms which store all the information of the larger form. And this is also how nature reproduces its systems: you emit a smaller seed of information, and this seminal form then reproduces into many clones and reorganises itself. But in all scales of nature, we shall see the same system of organic iteration happens, once and again.

Crystals create a first small atomic cell that reproduces its information and reorders huge quantities of atom to form again a bigger crystal. Quarks and electrons emit a flow of quanta called ‘forces’ which fast evolve from gluons and ¥-rays into a new particle. All this thus must be formalised giving our Space-time Generator ‘scalar depth’, to be able to explain the fundamental vital property of Nature’s fractals of space-time: to reproduce its information in other scales of space-time.

The Universe is a fractal of knots of Time Arrows.

It is now clear what reality is: a series of knots of Time Arrows, which latter we will formalize as ‘Non-Euclidean points’. Such points are in constant communication with self-similar points, reproducing their form and evolving socially into networks. The reproduction of form takes place in a fractal manner, by producing ‘seeds’ in a microcosmic, ‘lower scale of existence’, which latter grow. The networks are built with flows of ‘—motions’ and information that tie those points. And the result of those simple, yet repetitive processes of reproduction and social evolution is the creation of a world of ‘herds’, ‘cellular organisms’ and networks, extending through multiple scales of size in which the forms of ‘—motions’ and information and the structures and isomorphisms that build super-organisms remain invariant.

In physics, scientists talk of the invariance of motions discovered and generalized by Galileo and Einstein (Relativity). Yet we must ad in the fractal paradigm two new invariances, the invariance of scale – the same Time Arrows take place in all scales; and the invariance of topological form – the same shapes of ‘—motions’ and information emerge and repeat themselves in all scales (though, and this is essential for the reader to learn how to compare them, they are topological forms, where the ‘distances’ and sizes are relative, so what is conserved is the overall ‘lineal, planar shape’ of energetic functions, such as lineal limbs, lineal weapons, planar membranes; the cyclical, hyperbolic shape of reproductive cycles, which combine ‘—motions’ and information to recreate a form, such as those of your body organs or the cycles of an assembly factory or a mitochondria, and finally the toroid, convex, warped, cyclical forms of informative organs, such as a brain, a camera or an eye or a black hole.)

Those 3 invariances create a new ‘paradigm’ of science, no longer built on the belief of a single arrow of time, a single space-time continuum and a single clock-speed to measure it. The result of course is a more complex reality, but that was to be expected. We, humans are just one of the many games of existence of that fractal Universe, and it should not be expected that we are, regardless of our anthropomorphic myths, different from the rest, and able to fully understand in the diminutive brain all what exists, unless we simplify it.

What this work tries to do is to return to a minimal degree of complexity to be able to understand the fractal knots of times, which imprint the ‘—motions’ of reality with its information, constantly reproducing their form and playing the game of existence, constantly achieving the immortality of form.

The Universe is made of ‘time fractals’ that participate both of the properties of mathematical fractals and living organisms. Yet organic fractals are more complex than mathematical fractals, because they have motions. And so the reader should not confuse both terms.

Fractals are mathematical or organic forms, which iterate or reproduce their information in self-similar forms that extend through several scales of size and information which we shall call ‘i’-scales.

They are the most accurate models to depict natural phenomena related to informative growth and reproduction, the essence of life organisms:

Arrows of Reproduction & Information: ->ΔTƒ

All fractals originated by a Generator Equation (mathematical jargon) or mother cell, (biologic jargon) iterate=reproduce a series of self-similar fractals, called a set in mathematics or a family in biology:

Mother/Generator Cell: ->Σ∆-1 fractal family/set

The paradox of fractals is that the smaller the fractal scale is the more information it accumulates and the more detail it has. How this is possible? Because information is form-in-action, form with motion, and so the logic paths that systems use to process information are completed faster in lesser space. Further on, in physical systems the cyclical speed and frequency of a vortex with form (a mass or an eddy) increases when the vortex is smaller (VoxRo=k). So the increase of ‘cyclical speed’ diminishes geometrically with size. This result can be generalized to any system of knots of time. So the metabolism of small animals is faster than that of big ones. The cycles and clocks of atoms are faster than those of our scale, faster than those of the cosmological scale. The same can be said of geometric fractals: a Mandelbrot fractal holds more information in its smaller scales, as we enlarge them.

However, there is a fundamental difference between the logic, linguistic fractals of the mind and the physical Universe: While static, ideal, mental mathematical forms can be of any shape, as movement and friction don’t test their efficiency, in the Darwinian Universe only forms of Nature whose properties allow the being to process efficiently ‘—motions’ and information, survive. Thus, mathematics is an ideal language that can create any form, but in the Universe forms have to be efficient in their motion/function and parallel form. Thus, in Physics and Biology we add movement to the mental shapes of geometry, which enormously reduces the possible shapes.

Movement acts then as a ‘reality check’, an Occam’s razor that eliminates all complex forms, which won’t be able to move properly under friction, stress, turbulences and other obstacles proper of the real world. A Mandelbrot fractal might be very beautiful. But it wouldn’t be able to move very fast, and its attached microforms probably would break with an air stream.

So there are no such fractals in the Universe. Instead, we find physical entities made of cycles and lines in movement, for reasons of biological efficiency. Since a lineal movement is the shortest, most efficient path between 2 points. On the other hand, information is cyclical, because a sphere accumulates the maximal quantity of form in minimal space. While a cyclical rotation is the movement with less friction and the only one, apart from the line of ‘—motions’, that maintains the self-similarity of any form, even in trans-form-ations of size. A fact that explains, in terms of survival efficiency, the morphological invariance of ‘—motions’ and information shapes at scale.

Since Mathematical fractals lack, as pure forms of mental information, the energetic dimension of movement and growth, their fractal sets are attached to the Mother- cell’s boundary, where the self-similar forms nest, as in the case of the well-known Mandelbrot set. On the other hand organic fractals not only iterate their information as mathematical and mental fractals do, but also make it grow. Species are not mathematical but organic fractals, whereas the word organic refers to the non-mathematical properties of existential entities, which are better described with visual and logic/verbal languages. Those Biological theories of Time (Evolution theory, Theory of Organisms) include also the logic of survival that extinguishes the less fit – hence a relative past species – and reproduces the fittest, hence the future species; and it includes the visual languages that give movement to the forms of ‘—motions’ and information described by mathematics.

Nature’s fractals combine the arrow of ‘—motions’ and the arrow of information in an organic way.

They differ from geometric fractals in their dynamism and capacity to absorb ‘—motions’ from their environment. They not only iterate their form in microcosmic scales, but feed their offspring of information till they grow into full replicas of themselves. It is precisely the combination of both arrows what makes the behavior of an organism more complex and varied than the behavior of a mathematical fractal. So in the study of natural fractals, we have to add to the informative arrow – whose isomorphisms we deduced from the study of mathematical fractals and informative seeds – the ‘—motions’ arrow of ‘—motions’ that thermodynamics has analyzed:

‘—motions’, young arrow: Sp> ∞ x Tƒ->0            X     sp->0 x Tƒ->∞: Information, old arrow

For any Σ number of cycles: ΣSp x ΣTƒ = Organic fractal ΣSe<+>ΣT Organic cycle

The understanding of fractal processes provides a more detailed, scientific analysis of those processes. In that sense, unable to define information with the same rigor used to define the arrow of ‘—motions’ and ‘—motions’ physicists have ignored for centuries events connected to the arrow of information (chaos, turbulences, super-conductive and super-fluid phenomena, etc.). Physical events and particles are also subject to both arrows, as everything else in the Universe. Thus we define abstract equations (as the back and forth transformation of ‘—motions’ into mass, Sp=mc2) in terms of process of creation and destruction of information.

A single language cannot describe all the information that a certain being has within itself. So mathematical languages are also synoptic, and reduce the total information of the being. And that is the case of a fractal equation, which reduces the entity to its fundamental essence. In that regard, the Theory of Time Arrows is not Pythagorean, as Quantum Theories often are, in the sense that it does not consider the Universe to be made of mathematical entities, but merely affirms that among the linguistic mirrors that can map out the Universe, mathematics is undoubtedly the key language to represent the trajectories, cycles and motions of its species.

Because all languages observe the Universe, humans ‘talk’ those arrows of time with logic, verbal, visual, and mathematical languages. Since the syntax of verbal thought with its ternary structure and of visual forms with is line-cycle-wave structure and red-green-primary colors describe entities constructed with those arrows.

Recap. The Universe is based in 3 types of invariance, invariance of motions (Galilean relativity, now applied to the invariance of the 4 arrows/motions of time), invariance of scale (self-repetition of the same processes and arrows in all scales of size) and invariance of topological form (self-repetition of the ‘—motions’ and information shapes of reality. The 3 invariances define a Universe better described with the mathematical isomorphisms of fractals geometries, based in the existence of a generator equation that constantly reproduces information, creating networks of self-similar points, which structure all realities we see. The difference between a mathematical and an organic, Universal fractal is evident: organic fractals do have motion and their processes of reproduction and evolution are far more complex than those of mathematical fractals. So we must depart from a narrow-minded mathematical-only approach to study those fractal systems and consider mathematics one of the main but not the only language to describe its organic properties.

The 3 elements of all fractal beings.

We see a static, simple Universe in our relative human ‘plane of existence’. Yet reality is organic, extended from microcosmic to macrocosmic ‘dimensions or scales’, and dynamic, as all particles and forces have movement-’—motions’ and form, in-form-ation; and all of them are structured into networks, which share their ‘—motions’ and information. Those 3 elements: bites and bits of ‘—motions’ and information; networks and scales define the structure of all natural fractals, including the Universe.

They can be formalized with the Generator Equation we use to formalize the arrows of ‘—motions’, information, reproduction and social evolution. Since we defined Universal fractals as ‘fractals of Time Arrows’, hence both concepts a fractal Universe and a Universe made of knots of self-repetitive Time Arrows are the same. We observe different degrees of complexity in a chemical or mathematical fractal, in a fractal organism or in the fractal Universe; but those 3 essential elements repeat themselves, to the point that scientists use similar terminology for all of them:

– The elementary, iterative unit-cells of a fractal, which according to the duality of Universal arrows, will consist on relative bites of ‘—motions’ and bits of information. Those bits and bites are not static forms, but arrows that exchange ‘—motions’ and information; flows and cycles that the organism repeats constantly, generating self-similar forms. So we can define a simple iterative, cyclical equation with 2 terms, the 2 arrows of the Universe, which can be considered the generative cycle of all Natural Fractals:

∆: Fractal Cycle: Sp<=>Tƒ (dynamic state)+Sp X Tƒ (static, formal state)

The networks or systems of ‘—motions’ and information that organize those cells into bigger structures.

How feed-back cycles of ‘—motions’ and information grow into complex organisms, made of many cycles?

-In time through processes of discontinuous reproduction and evolution, which create similar action-reaction cycles, cells and organisms in other parts of the Universe. Most natural fractals have a dual network structure that attracts the micro-cells of the organic fractal by distributing the 2 arrows of ‘—motions’ and information to them. For example, in a human fractal, the nervous system delivers bits of information and the blood system delivers bites of ‘—motions’, control together its cellular units. In the Universe the same roles are played by the informative, attractive, gravitational force, and the electromagnetic ‘—motions’ forces.

-In Space through the organization of cellular networks that deliver ‘—motions’ and information to each cell-cycle. Those cell-cycles attach to the networks to process constantly new ‘—motions’ and information in their iterating cycles, creating bigger organic systems, made of multiple, similar forms.

When both iterative processes are combined, the fractal units of the Universe grow in ‘—motions’ through space and evolve its informative complexity in time, giving birth to the infinite combination of those fractal arrows that we call species, systems or organisms.

The equation includes an Σ-term to signify the gathering of individual Sp X Tƒ units into networks and webs:

ΣTƒ: Fractal networks: Σ (Sp<=>Tƒ) or Σ (Sp X Tƒ).

It still looks a simple equation to generate the Universe in its infinite variety. But the Complexity that arises from such simple scheme is enormous when we introduce the 3rd fundamental concept of fractal structures: Dimensionality. Since indeed, space-time cycles can exist theoretically in any number of dimensions. So we should consider in more detail the 3rd element of fractals: the fractal dimensions, planes or scales of existence invisible to human perception through which the fractal exists. They are:

– ∆st: The relative st-scales or dimensions across which fractals extend its organization. We use for the 3 relative scales of size that define most Nature’s fractals, the symbol O for information.

In humans there are 3: the cellular, individual and social scales; as most entities do not exchange ‘—motions’ and information beyond its upper and lower organic level. For example, humans, as individuals belong to a relative st-scale, and are aware of social tasks (our ∆+1 plane of existence) and cellular sickness (our ∆-1 plane), but the events that affect the galaxy, the macrocosms to which our planet belongs (st+2) or affect our molecules, the lower microcosms that make up our cells (st-2), hardly affect our existence. Thus depending on the detail and scale at which we observe most fractals we perceive a fractal cycle (minimal size and detail), a fractal cell or a fractal organism (max. detail and size):

Natural Fractal= ΣΣ∆-1 Cycles > Σst-Cells->∆+1 Organism.

How many elements in space make up a fractal, social network? The most obvious structure is a ‘tetraktys’, already considered by Pythagoras to be the magic number of the most perfect social networks. The reason is that a tetraktys can be written as a system with 3×3+st elements. Imagine then such tetraktys as a triangle with 3 vortices, each with 3 elements that will perform the arrows of ‘—motions’, information and reproduction, while the central ∆+1 element that communicates all others will perform the arrow of social evolution, representing the entire fractal as a unit of the next st-scale. Thus a tetraktys is a highly efficient form, found in all systems of nature, even in human, social systems: 9 soldiers and a caporal make a platoon and 9 caporals and a captain a division.

Recap: All fractals have 3 elements that define them: Cellular units, networks of ‘—motions’ and information that organize those cellular units, and st-scales in which a self-similar but not equal fractal structure emerges, once and again with the same energetic and informative complementary forms.

 

Classification of systems and superorganisms by its i-complexity.

Now we can return to the ‘network’ concept and coming from the generic isomorphism, see its human ‘variety’ , just another 3-topological being with 3 blood, endocrine and nervous networks, each with the generic properties previously described:

All Universal beings are superorganisms of temporal energy of different size, joined by networks of energy and information that control the quantic cells of the super organism. In the graph we can see with the ‘logic symbols’ of G.S.T. how a human being can be described both in time as a series of events between birth and extinction that happen through those 3 ages and as a spatial organism with a body of energy and a head of information.

So we can define a human being in space, as a mixture of 3 physiological networks, the digestive Max. Sp system, the Reproductive, Sp<=>O blood/hormonal system and the Nervous/Sensorial, Min. Tƒ System. The 3 together form the Human Spatial Organism:

Max. Sp (Digestive/skeletal systems) < Blood/Hormonal Systems > Informative/sensorial systems.

From where we can deduce a theory of human behavior, as what we do is to feed with energy our body, with information our mind, and seek to reproduce the system, the 3 PRIMARY arrows of behavior of any system of the Universe.

Sub-varieties with only a ‘few parts’.

All this said, of course, NOT pall systems are complete. For example viruses, do have the 3 parts (head with Dna, toroid legs and a muscle injector spiraled with a tube), but the do need the external world to the reproductive part. Some machines are only parts, energy cars or head computers, and they need a human to be completed (an animetal is hence rested, essential species to understand the economic ecosystem).

Yet species that survive do have by themselves or with the help of an enzymatic system (enzymen in the case of machines and its reproductive corporations) a ternary complete system. Since if they do not have a reproductive system they will be extinguished when they die. Only perhaps and this must be discussed in detail somewhere else, the ‘immortal proton-black hole’ of the eternal repetitive 2-8 atom-galactic scale might be immortal.

All this said we can classify all systems as ‘relative horizons’ of the generic evolution of social networks of growing complexity. And we can formalize them as partial equations of the Quantic Spaces-Times equation of a complete organism, SE<=>ST:

– A system, Se or Tƒ, is a quantic group  of ‘Non-Euclidean points’  the unit of all those systems (a fractal point or number 1 which can be anything, cells in organisms,  atoms in physical systems, etc.) related only by networks of energy or information.

– A super-organism, Se x Tƒ is made of 2 complementary systems put together: a body of quanta related by networks of energy and of quanta related networks of information.

– A living super-organism, Se< ST >Tƒ, is an superorganism with a 3rd, reproductive network that combines energy and information. It is the final horizon of systemic evolution in which the ‘upper class’ quanta with max. energy and information (Se+Tƒ) and the ‘brain’ and ‘skin’, control, invaginate and limit an intermediate region or ‘middle class’ of reproductive quanta with lesser energy and information, Se=Tƒ, that reproduces the specific energy and information of the system.

For example, according to its reproduction we can differentiate ‘living super-organisms’ that reproduce through its inner networks; from ‘mechanic super-organisms’, reproduced externally by a catalyst such as machines reproduced externally by men or proteins reproduced by DNA. Yet even ‘mechanic super-organisms’ can evolve potentially into ‘living superorganisms’ (robots).

In any case reproduction=repetition of a quantic ‘present form’ into another ‘quantic, present form’ is universal. Since in a quantic space/time Universe everything reproduces either internally or externally through the use of catalysts, as only forms that are copied in other s/t region survive after their quantic death.

– Finally, an ecosystem, world or Relative Universes (SE<=>ST), is a volume of organic space in which multiple super-organisms co-exist, related by their own specific networks of energy and information.

Most entities designed by men are systems, such as an electric network (an energy system), or a legal system (an informative network).

Most forms of nature are superorganisms (such as a molecule). While the most complex systems are worlds and ecosystems in which multiple species coexist, through 2 different behaviors: social evolution among the individuals of the same species and competition between different species.

Indeed, we distinguish according to the duality of ‘positive, informative order Vs negative, energetic entropy’ 2 types of macro-organisms: Darwinian ecosystems in which the relationships between the different species are ‘negative’, as they feed into each others’ and ‘worlds’ in which those relationships are positive. So, for example, a human nation is a ‘world’ and a jungle is an ‘ecosystem’. But that belongs to sub-post.

Recap.

The fundamental concept to understand super-organisms is that of a network, composed of ‘Non-Euclidean knots’ (mathematical description), ‘cells’ (biological description) or ‘minds‘ (philosophical description) that exchange energy and information, the 2 primary substances of the Universe). A super-organism gathers together a series of cellular super-organisms belonging to a few equal or symbiotic species around those networks of energy and information (for example, in a human being cells gather around the blood and nervous network, creating a human organism).

The program of existence, the will of super organisms.

What is the center of a territorial world or super organism, a zero point of a ternary structure, a topological bidimensional system with a will for its åctions trying to maximize its existence, to keep its ‘Se x Tƒ = ST, world or organism’ working:

Tƒ maximize your existential force, Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ: ∑Sp x ∏Tƒ, systems gather in social groups. They evolve in 3 degrees.

First they form ‘Systems’ which are parts that perform an energy or information task within a larger system.

They are often the products of human construction.

We are more interested in this blog in ‘Universal, natural systems’.

In Nature individuals evolve into ‘universals in 3 stages’, ruled by languages related to its time dimensions (genetic languages), its spatial extension (geographic languages) and finally construct an organism, or rather a super organism as each part of the lower scale is also an organism, emerging as a Universal which shares the properties of its parts:

∑∆>∏∆>Tƒ=∆+1

This is the ultimate ‘equation’ of existential algebra that explains why all systems in the Universe form social groups. But to do so they need a language of social communication… So they also evolve its spatial, temporal and scalar hierarchical languages.

Classification of systems and superorganisms by its i-complexity.

best networks

All Sciences share the laws of duality, systems and organicism. Since the properties of energy and information remain invariant in all the scales of reality. The result is the fractal structure of the Universe,a super-organims made of smaller super-organisms, described in the graph: Each science studies a ‘scale of organic size’, its cellular species of energy and information and its arrows of future time (energetic, informative and reproductive events, which culminate in the self-organization of those parts into social wholes, units of a new scale). In this paper we study the creation and evolution of the economic super-organism ruled by an informative language – money – and composed of metal memes, energetic weapons and organic machines, which interact with the human super-organism, history, made of human cells, verbal languages and natural energy.We define a simplex system as a network of self-similar ‘cells’ of energy or information.We define a complementary system as a dual network of energy and information that interact together. In Nature, by definition, all systems are complementary systems (Complementary principle of physics: all physical entities have a field of energy or force and a particle of information, mass or charge; Duality Principle of Biology: multicellular systems have an informative head and an energetic body, cellular systems have a DNA-informative nucleus and a cytoplasmic body).Finally, we define a complex system as a complementary system, which adds a 3rd, reproductive network, either internal or external to the entity (enzymatic reproduction).Thus all systems are networks of self-similar cells joined by flows of energy and information, and complex systems are those who add a reproductive network.

Complex organisms  

Let us now try an even higher level of complexity in our description of why organisms live and die and what motivates ther behavior.

The fundamental advance of XXI century science is the realization that the Universe is Complex, made of simplex parts that become an organic whole – and those parts are at least 3 in all systems, an informative center or head/particle, a reproductive body that recreates the information of the system and a field of energy or environment in which the system feeds.. And since all systems of the Universe have those 3 elements, complexity applies the same set of basic laws to all disciplines.

complexity in that sense  is not different from classic science, which applies the same mathematical equations to all systems. However in complexity we believe that the Universe and all its parts are NOT modelled as a mechanism, a simplified ‘stage’ in the evolution of machines, but as organisms or parts of organisms (so machines function as enhanced human organs – a chip is a metalbrain, a camera a metal-eye and so on). In that regard, the philosophy of science sponsored by this web, as part of the science of complexity differs strongly from classic economists, which affirm that its discipline is a mathematical science.

The Jewish Physicist, Mr. Gell-mann, discoverer of the quark, lobbyied with the Nobel Prize Committee against an award to Economics. ‘What is next anthropology?’ – he said. The anecdote reflect the main sickness of our mechanist civilization – to despise all what is human, what is social, what is related to life. He calmed down however when he was told that the prize would be given by the Bank of Sweden only to mathematical models of economics. And yet because humans are biological beings and economics describes the activity of man, it must be first a biological science, which can also find patterns and mathematical laws as biology does.

Indeed, in complexity and systems theory we believe that all sciences can be explained with a series of laws that describe the organic structure of reality, made of networks of energy bites and information bits, which interact and evolve together, creating complex-organisms, departing from simple particles, which evolve into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms and societies. It follows that mankind’s goal is to evolve into a planetary organism, Gaia, in which we, human beings are the collective mind. This is the origin of the biological approach to economics and history in this web.

The facts behind Theory of Complexity are thus well known to all scientists: in the universe there is a constant tendency towards organization of individual species into herds. There are herds of atoms called molecules, herds of stars called galaxies, herds of humans called societies of History, or herds of machines called economies… Could we find certain rules and laws that explain all those herds and their behavior? Such is the aim of the Science of Complexity, called also Systems Theory or duality, because unlike ‘mechanicism’, the previous, rather primitive philosophy of the founding fathers of science, the Universe is NOT consideredto be a machine of energy, but a complex system made of dual networks=systems of energy and information.

Thus duality of energy and information, as opposed to ‘energetic monism’, the philosophy of ‘simple’ physicists, and Network or System, are the key words of this science.

And the main definition is that of a super-organism, which in simple terms can be described as:

‘A super-organism is a dual network of energetic and informative particles that constantly exchange energy and information between them:

∑ E <=> ∏ i’

Such simple definition is extremely powerful, because it allows to describe a multiplicity of beings. For example, your body is a cellular system with two main cellular networks of energy and information, which form your body and head.

A society or social organization is also a dual network, with an informative caste that rules and energetic body of workers.

In a closer look though, from one, the organism comes 2, the dual system of energy and information; and from 2 comes 3, a ternary system with 3 type of cells and networks, an energetic system, an informative system and one that combines both to reproduce the organism. And this kind of systems, is what we call a living organism.

Because some systems do not self-reproduce but need an external, reproductive catalyser, we often talk of duality instead of the Ternary principle.

Yet both concepts are equally important in the Universe, and specifically in the economic ecosystem that we study here, since machines are not self-reproductive sytems, hence they are not alive, but humans vitalize them reproducing them, and further on, one of the key elements of the Industrial R=evolution is the increasing self-reproductivity of machines, which is also one of the key ‘ideologies’ of capitalism, the absurd belief hold by companies, in control of most of the systems of power of our societies that humans MUST evove machines NOT mankind.

All this of course can be mathematized, and even though we shall not bring here the mathematics of complexity, we have written in our defintion what we call the ‘Generator equation’ or ‘Feed Back equation’ of complex systems. And it has 3 elements, the first element, ∑ E, describes a network of energetic particles the second element is the reproductive element that combines energy and information to reproduce the cells of the system, <=> and finally the third element is the informative network, ∏ i.

A key difference in those systems is now evident: energetic systems are herds loosely connected, and so we use a summatory system; informative networks are organic, complex networks in which each ‘neuron’ is connected with many other neurons and so the total number of connections is a power law or multiplicative law, reason why we use the symbol of multiplication. This is also the case in our organism (neurons are connected to many others, cells of a body are pegged to each other), and in societies, in which the upper classes of information are much more connected to each other than the individual cells of the mass, which have very few social connections.

This will be the case when we study the superorganisms of history and its upper castes in control of the languages of power of society (money, weapons and the law) who pray over a mass of unconnected, clueless misinformed sheeple. Yet in working societies (real democracies and non-corrupted love religions today mostly extinct) this is not the case – all cells of the body receive energy and information to survive as an efficient organism, since they cannot be obliged to obey with the force of metal but must believe in the wor(l)ds of wisdom of their leaders that cannot impose their will by force.

Now we can return to the ‘network’ concept and coming from the generic isomorphism, see its human ‘variety’ , just another 3-topological being with 3 blood, endocrine and nervous networks, each with the generic properties previously described:

All Universal beings are superorganisms of temporal energy of different size, joined by networks of energy and information that control the quantic cells of the super organism. In the graph we can see with the ‘logic symbols’ of G.S.T. how a human being can be described both in time as a series of events between birth and extinction that happen through those 3 ages and as a spatial organism with a body of energy and a head of information.

So we can define a human being in space, as a mixture of 3 physiological networks, the digestive Max. Sp system, the Reproductive, Sp<=>O blood/hormonal system and the Nervous/Sensorial, Min. Tƒ System. The 3 together form the Human Spatial Organism:

Max. Sp (Digestive/skeletal systems) < Blood/Hormonal Systems > Informative/sensorial systems.

From where we can deduce a theory of human behavior, as what we do is to feed with energy our body, with information our mind, and seek to reproduce the system, the 3 PRIMARY arrows of behavior of any system of the Universe.

Sub-varieties with only a ‘few parts’.

All this said, of course, NOT pall systems are complete. For example viruses, do have the 3 parts (head with Dna, toroid legs and a muscle injector spiraled with a tube), but the do need the external world to the reproductive part. Some machines are only parts, energy cars or head computers, and they need a human to be completed (an animetal is hence rested, essential species to understand the economic ecosystem).

Yet species that survive do have by themselves or with the help of an enzymatic system (enzymen in the case of machines and its reproductive corporations) a ternary complete system. Since if they do not have a reproductive system they will be extinguished when they die. Only perhaps and this must be discussed in detail somewhere else, the ‘immortal proton-black hole’ of the eternal repetitive 2-8 atom-galactic scale might be immortal.

All this said we can classify all systems as ‘relative horizons’ of the generic evolution of social networks of growing complexity. And we can formalize them as partial equations of the Quantic Spaces-Times equation of a complete organism, SE<=>ST:

– A system, Se or Tƒ, is a quantic group  of ‘Non-Euclidean points’  the unit of all those systems (a fractal point or number 1 which can be anything, cells in organisms,  atoms in physical systems, etc.) related only by networks of energy or information.

– A super-organism, Se x Tƒ is made of 2 complementary systems put together: a body of quanta related by networks of energy and of quanta related networks of information.

– A living super-organism, Se< ST >Tƒ, is an superorganism with a 3rd, reproductive network that combines energy and information. It is the final horizon of systemic evolution in which the ‘upper class’ quanta with max. energy and information (Se+Tƒ) and the ‘brain’ and ‘skin’, control, invaginate and limit an intermediate region or ‘middle class’ of reproductive quanta with lesser energy and information, Se=Tƒ, that reproduces the specific energy and information of the system.

For example, according to its reproduction we can differentiate ‘living super-organisms’ that reproduce through its inner networks; from ‘mechanic super-organisms’, reproduced externally by a catalyst such as machines reproduced externally by men or proteins reproduced by DNA. Yet even ‘mechanic super-organisms’ can evolve potentially into ‘living superorganisms’ (robots).

In any case reproduction=repetition of a quantic ‘present form’ into another ‘quantic, present form’ is universal. Since in a quantic space/time Universe everything reproduces either internally or externally through the use of catalysts, as only forms that are copied in other s/t region survive after their quantic death.

– Finally, an ecosystem, world or Relative Universes (SE<=>ST), is a volume of organic space in which multiple super-organisms co-exist, related by their own specific networks of energy and information.

Most entities designed by men are systems, such as an electric network (an energy system), or a legal system (an informative network).

Most forms of nature are superorganisms (such as a molecule). While the most complex systems are worlds and ecosystems in which multiple species coexist, through 2 different behaviors: social evolution among the individuals of the same species and competition between different species.

Indeed, we distinguish according to the duality of ‘positive, informative order Vs negative, energetic entropy’ 2 types of macro-organisms: Darwinian ecosystems in which the relationships between the different species are ‘negative’, as they feed into each others’ and ‘worlds’ in which those relationships are positive. So, for example, a human nation is a ‘world’ and a jungle is an ‘ecosystem’. But that belongs to sub-post.

Recap.

The fundamental concept to understand super-organisms is that of a network, composed of ‘Non-Euclidean knots’ (mathematical description), ‘cells’ (biological description) or ‘minds‘ (philosophical description) that exchange energy and information, the 2 primary substances of the Universe). A super-organism gathers together a series of cellular super-organisms belonging to a few equal or symbiotic species around those networks of energy and information (for example, in a human being cells gather around the blood and nervous network, creating a human organism).

The program of existence, the will of super organisms.

What is the center of a territorial world or super organism, a zero point of a ternary structure, a topological bidimensional system with a will for its åctions trying to maximize its existence, to keep its ‘Se x Tƒ = ST, world or organism’ working:

Tƒ maximize your existential force, Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ: ∑Sp x ∏Tƒ, systems gather in social groups. They evolve in 3 degrees.

First they form ‘Systems’ which are parts that perform an energy or information task within a larger system.

They are often the products of human construction.

We are more interested in this blog in ‘Universal, natural systems’.

In Nature individuals evolve into ‘universals in 3 stages’, ruled by languages related to its time dimensions (genetic languages), its spatial extension (geographic languages) and finally construct an organism, or rather a super organism as each part of the lower scale is also an organism, emerging as a Universal which shares the properties of its parts:

∑∆>∏∆>Tƒ=∆+1

This is the ultimate ‘equation’ of existential algebra that explains why all systems in the Universe form social groups. But to do so they need a language of social communication… So they also evolve its spatial, temporal and scalar hierarchical languages.

The survival actions of super organisms.

3 HUMAN scales best

In the graph, all systems of the universe are points of view and super organisms  and individuals parts of social herds, which interact through exchanges of energy and information in a single plane. Those 3 perspectives of a being are studied together to fully grasp the nature of any system, as the entire system constantly interact across a certain number of ±∆ planes of existence.

In the graph, we describe the main isomorphisms of Human p.o.vs and our ternary super organic spatial and temporal structure (below). As we are made as all systems of Particles/heads that gauge and perceive information, Tƒ, with limbs/fields, Se, that extract energy of a relative U±2 world, combined in bodies and waves that iterate the system.

Thus all systems have a spatial, topological assembly of 3 organic parts, that will exist causally 3 ages of evolution of its forms through those 3 topologies, and will in the process establish a series of åctions in time, combination of their vital energy and information with the ‘complex world of U±4 planes of existence around it.

In the previous post we study the superorganisms of the Universe from the perspective of its time symmetry or worldcycle.

Yet if the world cycle of life and death and its 3 ages are the ‘time view’ of Universal Superorganisms, its Œi structure as networks of points is its spatial view, and as such the Superorganism embodies both the spatial and temporal, formal and functional organic and temporal meaning of all existences.

Universals then treated as networks become the ‘biggest’ scale of growth possible to any system born in the ∆-1 seed state. As it will finally reach the 10 up to 10 scale that makes it ‘transcend and emerge into a Universal new Plane of existence. Such is the magic number of stars in a spiral galaxy, atomic ties in a DNA, cells in a normal organism, and so on.

We can then talk of a ‘discrete’, scalar game of social groups of 10 elements that evolve in the same plane of existence, the same ecosystem, and as it organizes its numbers finally emerge as a whole being.

And so the study of this game in its spatial and temporal symmetry through the building of its networks of cellular/atomic points, its societies of decametric elements, its horizons and languages of coordination, and so on, is the highest level of ∆ST, of Philosophy of Science, of knowledge about the meaning of it all – from ∆-1 to ∆+1…

Universals are the U∆ Huge Wholes, established by a logarithmic scale on base 10¹º. Thus to make a U∆, a Universal Plane of Existence, we talk of billions and trillions of cells, particles, which become far away points of The U∆, Whole, topological plane.

Unlike societies of lesser numbers of ‘atomic cells’, ∆-points in Universal Planes are quasi infinite. In fact, as they disappear in detail and become ‘points’ only observed externally by science, they become the ‘infinitesimal’ of those wholes, and hence the meaning of infinity, is the whole and of infinitesimal existence, the point-article of the whole, cells in biological systems, atoms in physical systems, stars in cosmological galaxy and so on

For discussing the properties of a system, it is usual not necessary to go beyond one level of substructure.

Turning the table around, we can say that the properties of any elementary particle are hardly discernible in systems which have more than one level of structure.

∆¡>|2|. PHYSICAL SYSTEMS

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal, organic structure of all beings of reality: On the left, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies and its comparison with a neuronal cell; on the middle, an ice fractal, a plant and a river; on the right, a cluster of galaxies and a lung.

Fractal and non-Euclidean mathematics have evolved our understanding of information in topological terms, defining a new Fundamental particle of the logic/geometrical Universe, the Non-Euclidean Point, which unlike classic Euclidean points, has inner parts – an informative center and a field of ‘—motions’ that moves it. Such points constantly communicate ‘—motions’ and information with self-similar points, through non-Euclidean lines (waves which share the ‘—motions’ and form of those points), shaping together ‘Non-Euclidean space-time planes’, the network-entities of the graphs, which all structures of nature constantly reproduce organizing a canvas of simpler, energetic ‘cellular’ motions.

From the simplest particles, quarks and electrons that absorb ‘—motions’ and reproduce new particles to the most complex informative species, human beings, reality is made of bits of information and bites of ‘—motions’, evolved in complex, social networks through fractal scales, from atoms to molecules, to cells to organisms, planets and galaxies. We can mathematize those processes using non-Euclidean topologies and generator fractal equations that iterate and self-organize in networks those points of nature – an ice geometry, a DNA code, a cellular structure, a physical particle.

Thus, when we fusion the mathematical and organic understanding of reality, the Universe appears as a fractal of ‘—motions’ and information, made of self-similar parts, which constantly reproduce their forms. And the quest of the fractal paradigm is to find an equation able to define all those systems – the ‘Fractal Generator of the Universe’: Sp<=>Tƒ

Fractal Universe: Whole of wholes.

In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind.

Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” says Hogg. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.

Sloan survey and others organised even since show the Universe is mathematically very similar to a fractal, as galaxies form discontinuous systems of networks.

In the present zeitgeist of physics, which considers only mathematical properties for all physical systems those discoveries seek for a mathematical equation that ‘scales’ the form of ‘time vortices’ – spiral systems that grow information towards the center of a material system – in all the scales of size of the Universe, from the smaller atomic vortex to the largest galaxy and beyond.

For systems science, the alternative philosophy of science to mechanism that insists the universe has organic properties and can be modelled as an organic system co-existing in several scales of organisation the interest of the fractal structure of matter and many other biological systems is on the ‘meaning’ and consequences of a world, which constantly reproduces its systems into clonic systems, from particles that decouple into new particles, and organise into atoms, molecules, cells, matter, cosmic bodies, societies, super organisms and galaxies.

It is this hardly explored multiple language organic Universe the one we shall build in this blog.

Unfortunately beyond what obsesses the Pythagorean believers – the exact mathematical equation of the fractal in terms of space size, which says nothing about the organic structure of the universe – astrophysicists don’t go further into their models of the fractal, organic Universe. In the photograph we can see that really what calls attention is the network structure of the universe similar to any other fractal organism, and that is what matters to the organic paradigm. We shall indeed in the section dedicated to astrophysics study galaxies as organic networks similar in a larger scale to the structure of cells, with ‘DNA-informative black holes’ that regulate its structure and mitochondria stars that reproduce the energy of the system, made of 2 networks of electromagnetic energy and gravitational information. ‘Networks of similar space-quanta’ regulated by energy and information becomes then the simples definition of a super organism, the fundamental particle of the organic paradigm.

Networks thus evolve into wholes whose functions of informative gauging, energy feeding, reproduction and social organisation define the structure of super organisms, as the parts make emerge at least in its functions, not always in its form, the system in a higher scale. Abstract scientists though limit their inquire to a spatial mathematical ‘measure’ without any concern with the more important dynamic functions of those forms.

We show some experimental proofs of the fractal structure of space-times, both in its relative ‘scales of spatial size’  (ab. Spe) and the relative speed of its clocks of temporal information (Tiƒ), which together conform the 5th Dimension of Fractal space-time, essential to understand the structure of the Universe.

On the left, we can see the growth of a ‘new scale of the 5th dimension’, in the process of accumulation of bosons. In the centre above, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies. Below the comparison of our region of the Universe with a neuronal cell; on the right, an ice fractal, a plant and a river and a lung. And further below a scheme which explains the concept behind the 5th dimension and its importance for all sciences; as each of them merely studies one of the relative scales of size of the universe. So what general systems means is a unification of the laws of all sciences under the more complex concept of an organic fractal universe, whose common laws are extracted of the understanding of the fractal, quantum structure of space and energy, and the cyclical nature of its time clocks, with different speeds for each of those scales – the so called isomorphic laws of systems sciences.

Hence the 2 names of this site, generalsystems and unificationtheory.com.

Now the fractal network structure of the Universe should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to redesign science, and the idea scared scholars, given the enormous development reached by the scientific discourse with the biased, unfocused mental mirror of a Universe constructed with the formalism of a single space-time continuum; that is a short of background cartesian space-time, an abstraction of pen and paper mathematics, where we draw, with a single time clock, a mechanical artefact invented by man, not found in measure, and a single space-continuum perceived at the human scale of size…

This way of seeing reality might be obvious, but it is not certainly truth and since we use it to model the fractal Universe and all its parts, and scales of size, and different time rhythms, and beats, from those of fast atoms to slow galaxies, to circadian life rhythms, what humans get is a quite messy, chaotic vision of the whole, the Universal order, embedded in the fractal structure of the cosmos, and all its parts, which as the images show, from lungs to rivers to human cellular structures and brains, are all made to its image and likeness of the Universal fractal.

This puzzles humans who have an extreme attachment to the ‘visual view’ they have of reality, which packs all the information and scales of that fractal into the continuous scale of our vision, and all the clocks and different rhythms to the second beat of our heart, eye glimpse, mind thought and the machines we have created to measure with that ‘human time rhythm’ all other rhythms of the Universe.

But a fractal universe is absolutely relative. There is not a preferential size in space – an atom is not simpler or more complex than a man and a galaxy, it simply belongs to a different scale, but when we grow in size and detail, we observe an enormous complexity. And there is not a preferential rhythm of time, not we can deform all time rhythms but simplifying them with the human steady state second rhythm.

Because a fractal is indeed a completely different entity to that of our present scientific world of absolute space and single time ‘motion’, we truly need to make a huge change in the foundations of science to describe the new paradigm.

A complex theory includes all the simplex one.

Paradoxically while the simplex paradigm of mechanist science cannot explain the organic world, the fractal, organic paradigm includes within it by the principle of correspondence all the other models of the Universe.

For example, we mentioned that time in physics is lineal and in GST, cyclical, but while a line cannot conceive a cycle that needs a second dimension, for a cycle a line is a small step of the cycle when seeing in close range. The quantum mathematical only theory cannot explain the whys of its processes, but the organic paradigm, includes both, the how of quantum numbers and the why of its organic purpose. Each science can only explain the species of its scale; only the 5th dimension can explain all sciences with the same laws. The mechanist science only can explain machines, the fractal organic paradigm considers machines just simplex organisms of metal, in its first stages of evolution. And so on.

This said the reader should understand first the 3 common features of all systems, organisms and species of the Universe, its fractal structure in space, cyclical, finite duration in time between birth and extinction and co-existence in different scales of the 5th dimension.

The physical analysis – relativity: Elliptic geometry and its effects on cosmological perception vs. quantum relativity and its effects on microscopic perception

To notice, even though is not the theme of this post, that Relativity paradoxes act differently in internal and external time and space, according to the inversion of those Inner/Outer elements, necessary for the total balance of both. So as external time ‘decreases’, internal time-mass increases and the subjective life duration of the system increases; and as external speed-space increases, internal length decreases (shorting of the length of the being) in such a manner that Internal and External space-time remain balanced.

Screen Shot 2015-09-27 at 14.12.58

So when Einstein says that space-time is non-Euclidean, what he means is that from the human perspective of ‘Euclidean light space-time’ of a single plane of existence, which has always a hyperbolic/planar/Euclidean flat geometry, the present variety of bidimensional systems, we perceive a shrinking of form, of information, which appears as a curved geometry, as the higher information of our scale and faster time clocks become reduced to slower time clocks and we perceive a smaller, warped quantity of information, form.

So what truly is an elliptic geometry is the perception of the cosmological, gravitational scale from the light space-time scale. And this is truly what Relativity describes, along its external/internal space-time deformations (slowing down of external time, acceleration and increase of mass vortices or internal clocks, enlarging of external space-speed, shortening of internal length). Again, Mr. Einstein did describe the hows of this with his mathematical equations. We are as usual simplifying from the higher perspective of the laws of 5D metric, and explaining the whys of it.

In the graph, space contraction in relativity physics is the shortening of an object along the direction of its motion relative to an observer. Dimensions in other directions are not contracted. The concept of the contraction was proposed by the Irish physicist George FitzGerald in 1889, and it was thereafter independently developed by Hendrik Lorentz of the Netherlands. The Michelson-Morley experiment in the 1880s had challenged the postulates of classical physics by proving that the speed of light is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion.

FitzGerald and Lorentz attempted to preserve the classical concepts by demonstrating the manner in which space contraction of the measuring apparatus would reduce the apparent constancy of the speed of light to the status of an experimental artifact.

In 1905 the German-American physicist Albert Einstein reversed the classical view by proposing that the speed of light is indeed a universal constant and showing that space contraction then becomes a logical consequence of the relative motion of different observers. Significant at speeds approaching that of light, the contraction is a consequence of the properties of space and time and does not depend on compression, cooling, or any similar physical disturbance.

Now in 5D metric the key question is this:

both, the LF interpretation from the perspective of the inner time of the observer and the Sp interpretation from the external space-time are equally valid, but actually we prefer the earlier LF interpretation from the perspective of the apparatus, or experimental artifact, explaining it, in the following fashion: the observer that emits the ray of light ‘stops’ in the moment of doing so, and by ‘stopping’ it appears to an external observer which perceives a continuous motion as if it had shortening its length. In fact it is a stop and go, as perception requires stopping motion to emit a ‘form’, since form, time is still cyclical motion.

Or in other terms, as the particle of water does not really move in a wave but makes a circular motion, at the lower scale while at the larger scale the wave advances, the electron that emits the light ray doesn’t move, at the lower scale but the light wave advances.

And vice versa, when we diminish in size as we increase the speed of time and quantity of ‘informative quanta, cells or atoms’ of the scale we travel, -∆Se x ∆Tƒ = C, we see an enlargement of information, as if magically the total quanta and parts of reality were increased, each one a replica of the larger form. And this appears to us as if we were travelling along an Escher drawing of hyperbolic geometry:

Screen Shot 2015-09-27 at 13.54.56

In the graph, as we enter smaller scales of higher information according to 5D the effects are inverse to those of growing and enlarging our size, slowing down our time (Einstein’s relativity effects). Instead we increase our information and so we perceive a repetitive hyperbolic geometry, as if magically reality would enlarge and repeat itself, as in mandelbrot’s fractal or Escher drawings:

250px-Escher_Circle_Limit_III

As usual the understanding of those scalar paradoxes implies a full harmonization and reinterpretation and solution of the whys of 2 branches fundamental to physics, the ‘growth of scale’ described by relativity and the diminishing quanta and electromagnetic scales (where toroid functions are common), described by quantum theory, which obviously CANNOT be unified with the pedestrian void-of-why-understanding procedures of physicists (playing with equations and terms they do not fully understand).

The simplest of those solutions is the comprehension of the electron nebulae which is in fact a toroid ‘descend’ from the whole, the electron into the photonic ultra dense H-planckton, the quanta of the electron, whose maximal momentum (particle state) will happen in the point where the ‘larger U’ perception happens.

Now, if those 2 ‘inverse perceptions’ define the way we humans from the ∆-scale understand the cosmological, relativity scale and its inverse, electromagnetic quantum scale, what about our ‘scale’?

Our scale which exists between those 2 limits can be described with Euclidean Geometry, and it is what we call Newtonian Mechanics, which does not require any deformation but uses the planar or hyperbolic geometry used to describe the lineal and angular momentum/moment of the –O dualities of our scale.

A mention apart requires the ‘4th great field’ of space-time physics, the ∆->∆+1≈U-1 thermodynamic laws that relate our scale with that of molecules, which is defined by the entropic/temperature parameters of ‘energy and information’ , where temperature are the vibrating frequency of the molecular clocks of time, and entropy-energy-heat parameters of its lineal spatial motion?

Of those also extensive themes studied in depth time permitted in our articles of physics, we shall comment only the relationship between the U+1≈Su-1 human vs. molecular, Heat vs. Kinetic Energy, Temperature vs. Entropy duality.

What we call the laws of thermodynamics deal with the transcendence of the motions-energy of the lower molecular scale into the upper human scale. Because ideally energy-motion is transferred from upper scales to down scales without loss (synchronic motion of your arms, where all cells move with the energy of your whole will) and information from low to upper scales without loss (genetic reproduction), when we try the inverse, the transfer of energy from the U-1≈∆+1 plane of molecular kinetic energy to ours, part of the energy-motion of the molecules is not transfer, as this is against the natural arrow of energy-motion (from up to down scales), and this is the ultimate meaning of entropy, which is the quantity of energy-motion which is not transferred to the upper scale hence it is not available to do work but stays as heat in the molecular state.

In terms of geometry this means that we are transferring a toroid geometry into a planar one, reducing it, and it is possible but beyond the scope of this web, to represent the laws of entropy in terms of transformations between those 2 manifold varieties.

What entropy does NOT mean is that the Universe is dying, that black holes evaporate, that… all those philosophical musings of physicists using single space-time continuum models. In this I do agree with Mr. Feynman: ‘classic physicists should never ask whys, because their models are so outdated that is a miracle enough that they work so well with how-measures (-:

It is in that sense astonishing how without understanding really ‘anything’ physicists have achieved through the experimental method such an astounding perfection in his measures of the Universe.

In brief we could resume the ternary elements of those geometries in the mathematical ternary description of our plane of existence and its motions (Newtonian->Euclidean), the upper cosmological gravitational scale (elliptic, curved with metric of external increasing speed-size and decreasing time speed, balanced internally by decreasing length and increasing mass-time clocks ) and the lower scale of toroid quanta.

 

The why of science: the topological, fractal paradigm.

All what you see can be reduced to numbers, because numbers are ‘social groups’. In the 3rd paradigm of metric measure those social groups were described merely in its external properties. System sciences analyses its internal, topological structures, as societies of Non-Euclidean Points (points with form and motion), whose exchanges of ‘—motions’ and information create complex networks of self-similar beings. Can we reduce all those topologies and organic functions of network spaces to a few postulates as the previous Euclidean Geometry did?

Yes, we can, but for that we must complete the work started by Riemann and Lobachevski, who discovered the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry and affirmed that through a point infinite parallels could cross. For a century and a half no mathematician seemed to have realized that if the 5th postulate has changed, we had to adapt the other 4 postulates to the new definition of a ‘point with breadth’, through which parallels cross. This point is the fractal point, which grows in size and scale, becoming a topologic network of smaller points, as we come closer to it. The Universe is indeed absolutely relative because ‘each point is a world in itself’ (Leibniz).

Yet geometric restrictions that allow only 3 types of topological forms in a 4-dimensional Universe -the informative, toroid topology, the energetic, planer sphere, and the cyclical reproductive hyperbolic -reduces all the internal parts of a fractal point to 3+1 functions or arrows of time, ‘—motions’, information, reproduction and social evolution that conform the ‘program’ or why of the Universe explained in detail in the twin lecture of this work1.

Those 3 functions become the functions of 3 specialized fractal networks of points that construct the systems of reality, from your organism, made of 3 physiological networks (the energetic, digestive network, the reproductive, blood network and the informative nervous network), to the galaxy, organized by a network of electromagnetic ‘—motions’, gravitational information, and a series of herds of stars, non-Euclidean points that reproduce the atoms of the galaxy.

The principle of transformation of ‘—motions’ into form: ‘‘—motions’ never dies but transforms back and forth into information; Exi=K, Sp<=>Tƒ’ represents the two parts of ‘—motions’ and form of those non-Euclidean point, the new mathematical unit of the 4th paradigm, where points become ‘topological balls’, and the Universe a geometry of multiple fractal scales of space-time, which grow in size and information when we come closer to them. Each of those points have a different rotational clock, rhythm or ‘speed of time’ and a different size, which in each scale is used by those particles to gauge information and measure distances and energies and motions, as each of those points interact with other points of its relative space-time world.

Thus the key to understand the structure of organisms are the 4 new postulates of non-Euclidean geometry based in the concept of a fractal point. Since we have also to account for the other key property of the spaces we see around us: each of them when observed in detail is made of multiple, smaller self-similar parts, we call generically ‘cells’. So even the smallest point, when seen in detail, becomes a fractal point with multiple parts -a non-Euclidean point in which the parts assembly themselves into wholes by connecting themselves through networks, sharing flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and then become parts of even bigger wholes (so particles become parts of atoms parts of molecules parts of cells and planets parts of organisms and galaxies, parts of societies and Universe, in biological and physical spaces). Yet those networks leave dark spaces between their connections where other networks can occupy a place. So thanks to those dark spaces, we find that the system mixes two types of networks – toroid informative networks and energetic, planar or spherical networks (as a sphere has in small surfaces the properties of a plane).

Reality is constructed with 3 levels of increasing complexity: In the first level any trajectory that returns to a point creates a closed form or time cycle, a clock, the unit or minimal event of Reality. Then many time cycles, chained to each other with certain synchronicities create a knot of time cycles that fills a vital space and becomes an entity of reality. We will describe those knots of time cycles as Non-Euclidean points, whose topological parts and isomorphisms become the mathematical foundation of Multiple Spaces and Times. Finally many knots of time cycles, exchanging flows of spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information create complementary, social networks, which in its more complex forms are able to reproduce the system and create ‘super-organisms’, wholes made of parts that are wholes of an inferior scale of reality.

Since non-Euclidean Planes are networks with ‘dark spaces’ not perceived by its points that only see the flows of the network; those ‘holes’ allow the creation of complex systems with many networks, webbed within those dark spaces.

Thus the why of the Universe is organic, social: the Universe is made of complementary energetic and informative networks of ‘Non-Euclidean points’ (points with form and motion) that evolve and combine together, creating reproductive networks. And such complex systems create, new bigger, fractal networks units of a larger plane of space-time, evolving reality in scales of size that follow the same organic isomorphisms – from particles that become atoms that become molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planets, galaxies and Universes.

‘Each point of the Universe is a world in itself ‘said Leibniz. What he meant was understood in the XX century when we discovered the fractal structure of the Universe. Indeed, each point of the Universe, when we come closer to it, becomes a super-organism, made of cells with self-similar functions of time, repeated in all scales where those fractal points display the same logic behavior.

The Universe is a fractal of Temporal, informative cycles that are constantly generated and imprinted in reality. It is a fractal of 4 self-repetitive motions, ‘—motions’, form, reproduction and social evolution, constantly happening around us in bigger and smaller scales, in bigger and smaller cycles, all type of beings feeding, reproducing, energizing and informing themselves. And because those åctions are geometrical, they leave a certain trace which betrays the purpose of the action: a lineal path of feeding, a vibration back and forth of reproduction, a cyclical, implosive, informative process, and so on.

The Universe creates superorganisms by creating first fractal complex informative cells from flows of simpler ‘—motions’, reproducing them and self-organizing them in 2 parallel, complementary networks, one of ‘—motions’ and one of invisible, faster, thinner information that controls the entire system.

We often see only with the scientific method one single of those 2 networks, as gravitation and since most of our human existence magnetism appeared as invisible to us. And it is a general rule that both space-times, the one of ‘—motions’ and information, have different Universal Constants which are ratios, e/I and o/e and Sp X Tƒ, which define the arrows of ‘—motions’, information and vectorial reproduction of any organic dual space/time plane of the Universe. Where the space-network of ‘—motions’ and the informative-network create a holographic organism as those we see all around us in reality.

The best mathematical and logic description of all those qualities that structure reality -self-repetition in smaller and bigger scales, motions with geometrical form, feed-back action-reaction processes, absolute relativity of size – are provided by Non-Euclidean and fractal geometries, the geometry of information, reason why the 2nd part of this book will develop the new formalism of the fractal paradigm, poised to substitute the quantum paradigm and resolve all its questions in physics.

The result of course is that we see fractal structures created by the paths of knots of time, following its arrows of exi=stence in all systems of the Universe. This is what we see, the how of those Time Arrows: fractal paths of existence.

Thus, we shall now finish this first section dedicated to the ‘metaphysics’ of the fractal paradigm’, the why of those paths, with a brief analysis of the fractal structures caused by self-reproductive knots of time, as they follow their paths of existence. The next chapters will be dedicated to a thorough analysis of the mathematical and logical isomorphisms that define the paths of Time Arrows, and how they build step by step those fractal networks we call ‘Nature’.

Since all what exists studied in detail is a cellular network of self-similar beings sharing ‘—motions’ and information and reproducing and evolving in social networks.

Recap. The Universe is a fractal of information that reproduces, by imprinting and breaking vital spaces into complex forms. Each fractal knot of Time Arrows performs in his search for exi=stence a series of paths and reproductive and social acts whose final result is the creation of a fractal networks. All what we see are fractal networks caused by those knots of time.

 

The Universe is a Fractal organism.

image022

The Universe and man described as fractals, whose cellular units are blood and nervous ‘—motions’/ information networks and informative masses (MACHOs, quark stars?) and light galaxies that shape 2 networks of radiant ‘—motions’ and dark, informative matter. Each point of those 2 networks (compared to the similar networks of a human organism) represents a galaxy.

The Universe can be described as a fractal, based in the existence of the 3 elements that define all Natural fractals:

– The Universe has 2 networks, one of electromagnetic ‘—motions’ and one of gravitational information (black holes, dark matter) that controls the electromagnetic world. It has also informative vortices (masses and charges) and lineal forces.

– Its fundamental particles, quarks of mass/information and electrons/photons of electromagnetic ‘—motions’ can absorb ‘—motions’, gauge information and reproduce self-similar particles.

– The structure of those particles and forces is scalar: lineal forces of electromagnetic ‘—motions’ and cyclical particles of gravitational information grow in scale and size, from the tiniest lineal and cyclical strings, which are so small that we cannot perceive them, to the atomic scale of lineal forces (light, gravitation) and cyclical particles (electrons and quarks), to the cosmic scale of gravitational and electromagnetic fields, caused by spherical, celestial bodies (stars, black holes and planets), creating the macrocosms we perceive.

The galaxy has a dual network of informative, black hole masses and electromagnetic stars, which are the cells of the informative and energetic networks of the galaxy, join by flows of gravitational and electromagnetic space. And in the same manner, if we take each galaxy as a st-point, we can map out the Universe as a dual network of dark, gravitational information (left side of the picture), which joins the central black holes of the galaxy and electromagnetic ‘—motions’, which joins the electromagnetic planes of the galaxies (a point in the right side of the graph).

Since systems extend in ‘4-dimensional space’ as a series of networks webbed among them, and in the hierarchical scales of size as a series of parts that become wholes, units/parts of new wholes and in time as a sequence dominated by one of those 3 networks, which will grow from the lower cellular scale into the social scale and die back into the cellular scale. And also we can consider that the Universe will go through 3 ages that correspond to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s spacetime equation and start as a relative ‘seminal cell’ in the big bang and finally warp into the big-crunch of maximal form.

Bio-chemical and geometrical fractals have been known for a century. But only recently we have studied the physical Universe as a fractal, born out of the dynamic combinations of those 2 arrows of time. One of its most remarkable successes is the description of Einstein’s space-time continuum as an iteration of some basic fractal geometries (Nottale). Thus Einstein’s sentence, ‘Time curves space’, means in fractal terms that the arrow of informative time curves the vacuum ‘—motions’ of the Universe, fractalizing it into fractal particles, charges and masses, which are fractal, spiral vortices of electromagnetic and gravitational information.

Moreover, if we order the sizes of the Universe in a decametric scale, we find that at certain intervals the same forms and functions appear once and again. In the 60s, the American filmmaker Eames made a documentary called ‘The Power of 10’, in which that iterative repetition of cyclical, spiral forms appeared from the quark to the cluster. In fact, the homology of form and function between those scales is so remarkable that the same equations describe the tiny magnetic field of an electron or a star, made of trillions of particles. Thus, since that decametric scale is the most common scale considered for the entire Universe, we can define the Universe in fractal terms:

‘The Universe is a fractal super-organism made of particles of information and forces of ‘—motions’ gathered in networks, whose formal cycles repeat in decametric scales’.

While the fractal Universe and the continuous model of the big-bang use the same experimental information, the final outlook is very different. Since the fractal Universe is:

  • B) Cyclical. C) ∞ in ‘—motions’ x information scales.

Indeed, even if there were a process of organic reproduction, of a big-bang like radiation of forms and particles over a surface of void ‘—motions’, this will be subject to the duality of arrows of time, of life and death cycles, of big crunches (life, creation of information) and big bangs (death, creation of ‘—motions’). So B->A, and since the Universe is cyclical, it is eternal. And so, in a fractal Universe the metaphysical question is: do Universes become ‘microscopic black holes’, quarks of a bigger, fractal Hyper-Universe? A detailed study of the physical constants and parameters of those particles seem indeed to foresee a fractal Universe, which is not only infinite in its relative spatial size, but in the number of scales/planes of organic evolution, in such a manner that each galaxy could be the atom of a bigger Universe, as it happens in fact in the theoretical models of relativity, (Einstein-Walker model of a Universe made of galaxies, interpreted as ‘hydrogen atoms’13.)

What is the absolute form of the entire Universe? If we observe the previous graph, we realize that the known Universe shows the clear form of an electromagnetic wave, with a wider base shaped by the ‘gravito-magnetic’ field of dark matter… So we might consider it again a ‘point’ of a bigger network.

Recap: The Universe is a fractal of ‘—motions’ and information that extends in 10 perceived self-similar scales of Euclidean networks in which the 3 invariances of motions, form and scales are kept. But since in the fractal model the parameters of atoms and galaxies are self-similar, the Universe could be infinite in its scales.

 

∆<|3|. BIOLOGICAL SUPŒRGANISMS

TOPOLOGICAL EVOLUTIONimage007

Evolution follows the arrow of growing information, increasing both, the dimension of height and the social organization of individuals into herds and complex organisms, through a common language of information.

The Evolution of Information.

In the graph, the understanding of the arrows time, its dimensions, causal order, and the way in which they evolve individuals into social organisms, can also resolve and advance the science of Biology and evolution. Since living beings are also knots of time cycles of Entropy feeding, information gauging, reproduction and social evolution, perceived as still organisms, whose purpose is to evolve individual ‘cells’ of the same species into more complex beings. Thus chemical life cycles chain each other into complex systems called cells that evolved into bigger scales, till creating the biological cycles /clocks of information of human beings, the most complex informative species of the Universe. Further on, the duality of cycles/particles/heads of information, complementary to energies/lineal motions/forces/bodies also applies to biology, where bodies and heads create living systems.

How life evolves is disputed between evolutionists, who believe in a selective chaos and creationists, who think there is a design. Time Theory shows that neither is wrong or right. There is not a personal God that creates us – an ego trip of religious fundamentalists – but there are limits to the chaotic forms of evolution, set by the fact that the morphologies of Entropy and information are fixed by the efficiency of energetic lines and informative cycles, by the need of complementary designs, by the existential arrow of social evolution and reproduction that favors survival; and ultimately by the mathematical topologies and dimensions of ‘fractal information’ and spatial Entropy, which define the outcome of evolutionary tendencies. Indeed, watch the drawings of different life beings made of informative nuclei/heads and reproductive body. Informative systems are always smaller than bodies.

They are always on ‘top’ of bodies, perceiving more from the advantage point of view of the dimension of height. Further on, since information is bidimensional, informative systems are bidimensional (only a few animals have 3-dimensional vision). A book, a screen, a pulpit, an antenna, emits information from its top. A head, a camera, an electric field is on top of a body of Entropy.

This dominant arrow of information is dimensional; so species increase its height dimension, from planarians to human beings, a tall species of information. It is topological, so they evolve cyclical forms or heads on top of lineal forms or bodies. And it is eusocial, so they evolve from individual cells into social organisms through a common language of information (insects, human beings). Those dimensional, topological and eusocial isomorphisms complete Darwin’s Theory of evolution:

Ultimately, each species made of self-similar individuals is also a cellular super-organism, which follows the same causal arrows of organisms, with an increase of information towards its ‘3rd age’. Those 3 ages of ‘life’ in cellular species become then the 3 ‘horizons’ of evolution of species, which start as energetic, planar top predators (first shark fishes, first worms), with minimal size. Soon the species goes through a young, energetic age of growth in spatial size. Then it follows a II horizon of speciation and massive reproduction of the species (radiation age); and finally the species goes through an informative age of evolution in height and brainpower.

Then, either a new, more evolved species appears, causing the death of the previous species, which becomes extinct or dwindles in numbers; or the social evolution of the individuals of the species reaches such a degree of integration, through a common language of information that a macro-organism emerges. So ants successfully create superorganisms called anthills becoming the most successful animal on Earth, whose total life mass is equivalent to the life mass of humans, which also organize themselves into super-organisms of History, our Gods and civilizations. The success of those 2 species shows that the ultimate survival strategy in the Universe is that of social evolution. Since the total mass of ‘ants’ and ‘humans’ are the biggest ‘living masses’ of the planet, as the most complex social superorganisms of Earth.

Recap: Life species can be considered as superorganisms made of individuals=cells, which evolve through 3 horizons=ages, following all the geometrical and logical isomorphisms of space-time systems, as life systems are also complementary systems made of reproductive bodies and cyclical heads of information.

The fifth dimension of time: generational cycles.

Species become extinct or preys of trophic pyramids, if they don’t evolve informatively in social super-organisms, since as species their generational existence is also fractal, finite: all species have a genetic clock, the telomeres, which make them degenerate after a set number of reproductions.

It happens to cells that become cancerous or suffer apoptosis after their telomere clock stops; it happens to organisms that degenerate, especially in groups with little genetic diversifications; it happens in light that gets tired after 1010 years light of wave reproduction; as it is the best explanation of the cycle of light/dark Entropy; it happens to others particles whose mean life is often confused as in the case of light with its total sum of generational, particle/antiparticle, wave/particle cycles of existence; and it happens to cultures and civilizations, which have a decametric cycle, becoming destroyed every 800 years after 10 human generations. Yet those who evolve socially as ‘organic cells’ of a bigger organisms, seems to survive the generational cycle, since an organic cells needs less Sp X Tƒ force and it is protected from the environment by the bigger superorganism it lives in.

Recap. The 5th dimension of time is the generational clock-cycle.

The existential force. Strategies of survival.

We conclude that evolution is a guided evolution of form: Species evolve towards higher information. And those who don’t increase their capacity to understand the language of information of its ecosystem with better brains and better social systems become extinct in its relative universe. In the graphs we trace existential curves of species that survive better thanks to their informative arrow:

image010

In the graph, the Universe favors Top Predators, which are species with the maximal ‘existential force’, Sp X Tƒ (particle with more momentum in physics, M(o)xV(e); top predator in biology). Those species survive better as they perform better åctions and so ‘fill up’ the present Universe. Yet that simple equation is maximized when o=e, favoring a balance between the field and the particle, the body and head (‘mens sana in corpore sanum’).

The outcome of that simple law is the massive reproduction into the future of the top predator entity, which becomes for that reason, the ‘species that survives into the future’; while the species with less Entropy and information become extinct. However information is always relative to the bigger ecosystem in which the species exists, whose language of information defines that ecosystem. Thus in the galaxy, where the dominant language is gravitation, the black hole dominates the system; in this planet where the language is light, the species with better eyes (squids, then amphibian-reptiles, then mammals, especially felines with night vision and apes with 3-dimensional vision, and finally computers that will ‘talk’ with images dominate. Finally in the economic ecosystem made of humans and machines, the country with better memes of metal, better weapons (metal-Entropy), better money (metal-information) and better machines dominates and reproduces its technology worldwide.

Entropy and information motions become the generating, primordial cellular units of all species, including humans. Any system of reality is complementary. It has both -a lineal limb/force of Entropy and a processor of information or cyclical ‘head/particle’- which co-exist and evolve together. So the Law of Complementarity relates both inverse arrows in a static field/organism, creating complementary systems, composed by systems that process Entropy or ‘fields/bodies’ (physics/biology) and systems that process information or ‘particles/heads’ (physics/biology). How can we measure the efficiency of the 2 parts of the system together? Through the existential force.

The existence of multiple knots of Time Arrows implies that in the Universe of multiple time cycles, the words past, present and future, are also relative, quantized to each individual, who lives his past/youth or age of Entropy, present/maturity or age of reproduction and future/old age of information before dying, dissolving its exi=stence. Thus we need to analyze the relationships between entities which are in a relative past and interact with others that are in a relative future.

The simplest case is a family relationship between a grand-father, a man of the future with the wisdom of knowing in advance the cycles of time that his offspring will live, and its younger, less informed species: the young learns from the elder knowledge of previous cycles that will happen to the ‘past being’ into his future.

If we draw the example from different species, however the encounter will be Darwinian and only species which share the same information evolve together. Then the old, more evolved species with higher information will dissolve the simpler species into its relative past, as victim: there will be a Darwinian fight and the more evolved time knot from the future will kill and feed on the simpler form. And that is why we can establish that the relative future is guided by the arrow of information and social evolution, which creates better species. Since in a contact between past and future species, the future species survives, due to its better Entropy and information, its better existential force. It is thus possible to study from a mere temporal, evolutionary perspective the outcome of encounters between different ‘knots of time’.

When we consider the 2 ‘simple’ arrows of time that create the future, Entropy and information, as we do in Duality, all simplifies and explains itself, like it happened in earlier astronomy when Copernicus put the sun in the center. And one of the things it simplifies is the meaning of survival, which can be resumed in a simple equation: Max Sp X Tƒ = Survival. This function Sp X Tƒ, is the existential force, which explains that a species with the best Entropy body/force and informative particle/head will survive.

The existential force is equivalent to a particle’s momentum, Max MV, which determines the survival form in material collisions. In biology the species with better body and brains survives, which made lions and humans the top predator species of this planet… till we invented weapons and computers, energetic and informative species, made of metal, which now we fusion into robots, potentially the new top predator species of this planet. In the galaxy the highest existential force or momentum is that of a black hole. And it is proved in the Galaxy that the collision of a black hole of any size with any type of star converts the star into a black hole.

An important characteristic of the Existential force is that it favors a relative balance between the Entropy/body/force and informative/particle/head of the system: the more self-similar are both in quantity of cells and the higher the number of its networks/connections, the more synchronic they act together, and the higher the Existential force of the system is. This fact is the origin of the classic, harmonic, ‘beautiful’, mature state of most forms of existence that are in balance between both parameters, in a ‘mature’, steady state age.

Recap: The Universe selects the species with maximal Entropy and information: Max. Sp X Tƒ ->S=T. It will be a biological top predator or a particle with maximal momentum.

∆≈1,2. HUMAN SYSTEMS

Man as a fractal organism.

Man as a fractal is made of cellular units and networks of ‘—motions’ and information (nervous and blood systems), whose cycles and functions extend through 3 main st-scales: the cellular, individual and social scale. A human being described as a fractal will be composed of:

DNA cells, the Mother cells of the human fractal, whose genetic functions and forms repeat themselves trillions of times, composed of informative units (the DNA genes) and energetic ones (amino acids, bricks of genetic reproduction).

– A palingenetic process of reproduction and differentiation of those cells, which latter gather into energetic, reproductive and informative networks: the digestive, blood and nervous systems that create a human.

– The scales that group DNA molecules into cells, which gather themselves into organs, which gather themselves into physiological systems, put together into a human being.

Those scales break further in ternary and decametric systems: man has 10 organic systems, 10 fractal fingers, 10 glial cells feed a neuron, etc.

Of all the possible fractals that can be described with those 3 elements I share the fascination of Kant for what is inside the mind of men and what is above it, on the skies. So we will dedicate most of the pages of this work to study those 2 fractals, man and the Universe.

Recap: Humans are fractals of ‘—motions’ and information defined by the 3 elements of all fractals, cells, scales and reproduction.

 

EVERYTHING IS A T.ΠРTHE BLOG AND HIS AUTHOR

T.Œ=∑T.œs. The fractal, organic Universe and its ‘stiences’.

How to call this other more complex perennial philosophy of reality? In the pre-scientific age, it was understood by most eastern cultures, where spatial entropy was called yang or shiva, temporal information, yin or visnu and its combinations, qi, energy in the ‘cleaner’ more abstract taoist formulation, brahma, in the hindi anthropomorphic ‘polluted’ by myths, ‘carnal’ one. But obviously that was an age of remarkable intuitions with no exact measure and details given to us by mechanical instruments.

So we shall adopt by the Principle of Correspondence, the name used by physicists in their simpler, mechanical analysis of reality in only 4 dimensions, T.O.E. – a Theory of Everything; which now becomes T.Œ – a Theory of Everything Organic, when adding all the dimensions and complex organic properties of all those, T.œs≈ ‘Time§pace Œrganisms”.

The unity of it all becomes then self evident as we can define the Universe as a fractal super organism of space-time, made of ∞ smaller fractal timespace organisms made to ‘its image and likeness’:

Universe = T.Œ= ∑∞ T.œs

As this organic philosophy was after world war II retaken by the newly founded sciences of Information, cybernetics and systems theory at the Macy’s congress, upon the death of Einstein, when some of the highest minds of science, realizing physicists were limited in their understanding of information, struggling with their concepts of a single clock, defined those new sciences, with the expressed goal of constructing a formal model of ‘Duality’, which would include information theory to complete the single ‘clock-entropy’ fourth dimension of time of physics, I had given to the blog both names ‘general systems.wordpress.com’ and Unificationtheory.com an easier mnemonic term, which includes the full purpose of T.œ, to unify all ‘exi=stiences’, all sciences as all study co-invariant e x i = beings of ‘spatial Entropy and temporal Information’ dividing ‘subconsciously’ the ‘spectrum’ of the fifth dimensions of space-time by size, each one studied by a different science with a different jargon that ‘stience’ will unify departing from those ultimate substances of reality.

We shall naturally modify a bit the english language to adapt old concepts in an effort to ‘unify all jargons’ with intuitive terms. So ‘stience’ is the science of all sciences, each one studying an STi scale of reality and its ‘T.œs≈Time§paœrganisms’.

In that regard, 3 ‘acronym names’ (being consistent with the multiplicity of views of the Universe always a 3±i reality, with 3 elements for ceteris paribus analysis of a single plane of existence), will be used for ‘Absolute relativity’:

-The aforementioned T.œ.

– GST (ΓST): General Systems Theory, as it was the organicist philosophy of science in which I first expressed this theory scholarly, and the science founded at the death of Einstein to create a dual theory of the Universe, with both arrows entropy and information, which i chaired for a few years in the international Systems society  (but given the increasing use of his work in the evolution of organic robots, and AI, a no-no for the survival of the species i quitted the discipline). The same acronym as it happens resumes the Generator of Space-Time, the fundamental equation of Absolute relativity, for which we use the symbol Gamma, G in Greek: Γ. Does GST means also Generator of SpaceTime.

-∆st, ∆@st, ∆•s≈t and other symbolic characters resuming the 5 dimensions of space-time. I apologise for the many writings of those dimensions NOT with the specific symbols which are $,S,§ for the 3 topological dimensions of lineal, hyperbolic and informative space; t, T, ð, for the 3 topological dimensions of time, |, Ø, O for both combined, as topological space-time dimensions, as I am a lazy cow and for many of the right symbols I need to import ‘characters’ not directly written; plus many texts are of 30 years of lonely research in which the symbology has varied and the in-depth understanding of the theory has grown within my point-mind singularity-seed of GST≈T.œ≈∆•st, Absolute relativity.

Blog 2 x 2 sections.

The amazing expansion of our rational understanding of all sciences and the unification of its data, principles and beings (as all beings are made of spatial information and temporal motion) this huge overhaul of first principles, long overdue, represents despite the limited capacity a ‘first seed of information, this blog carries, will certainly change the outlook we have of the Universe and all its parts including man.  So it is worth even if the Nature of Scientific R=evolutions as per Kuhn is very slow on the scholar world, and starts with some errors, and very simple principles, to give on the part of the occasional reader of this blog, a chance to the reading of at least this brief introduction with the Universe of relational space-time packed in a ‘nutshell’.

Now, as the blog is so ‘huge’, potentially becoming an encyclopaedia of all ‘stiences’, arts and languages of human thought I advice the reader not to get lost to read through the first part of this central post, which resumes the model, and then seek for proofs in his main discipline of thought in the articles of the second line:

And stop when he finds the warning red line on them: to be cont’ed.

Since I am pouring 30 years of independent research on 5D and relational space-time and my timespan due to health problems is limited, I do have to apologise for those red lines, as I rather keep poring blocks not yet polished than left them die away on my notebooks and computers.   My intention is in that sense, similar to that of Copernicus, Leibniz or Darwin, authors of similar ‘huge scope r=evolutions’ that ignored for most of their life the ‘distribution of information’ through congresses, peer reviewed papers and scholar teaching, well-aware that this is a r=evolution that will take centuries to be completed, and certainly not easily accepted, as it puts man in an objective level with no preferred position on space, time and scale… Hence the philosophical name of the theory – absolute relativity.

In the graph, the four lines of the blog divided in 2 ‘different in-depth’ analysis of the game of existence that reproduces super organisms through worldcycles, and can be used to describe the existence between emergence and death of any system of nature.

In the 2 first lines from left to right, we describe the game of 5D space-time ‘singularities’ of information that through its actions of communication of entropy, energy and information reproduce super organisms that live traveling through the 5 dimensions of reality in worldcycles, zero sums between birth and extinction. Then we study once we know what ‘is all about’, the main classic disciplines of science, grouped by scale, astrophysics concerned with the symmetries between the large and the small, biology, on the scales closer to the human organism, and its 2 super organisms, the economic ecosystem, which actually is not human as it is reproducing metal-organisms, machines in company-mothers and the human proper organisms of history, civilisations, nations and religions (the subconscious collective of a civilization in its higher ∆+1 scale).

As the mind singularity is the most important part of the being, we close this description of classic sciences with an analysis of the human I=eye, wor(l)d, which are our natural space and time (past, present future tense verbs) description by our humind monad.

Then in the second more formal part, we describe with the main dimensions/laws of T. Œ, all the scales of super organisms, starting from the cosmos down galaxies, stars, planets and its 3 ages of life<history>metal earth (economic ecosystem), down to man, life, cells, matter systems, molecules, atoms forces and light and beyond the dark world of string/neutrino intergalactic space symmetric in the small to the larger cosmic world.

To that aim first we describe in a dynamic way the 10 dimensions of the being, and its properties, first the Monad and its languages with special emphasis in the Non-AE laws of mathematics, departing from its experimental units, fractal points of space and sequential number in time. Then we analyse the general laws of the world cycle of existence of any super organisms, in a dynamic generative way through its 5 x 2 @∆s≈t dual dimensions as form and motion.

 Now i want to apologise if the work is undone and improvements come slow… with slightly changed jargons in the naming of each dimension, etc. as the jargon of this new/old/perennial ‘philosophy of organic science’ has slightly changed in decades of personal research.
It is not truly only my fault… since I first finished the model during my master at Columbia U. and couldn’t get a team of specialists in each science to make it shine professionally. Hence abandoning the project for decades, till now in my third age, in poor health I try to place in the blog enough material for the model to survive my entropic 4th dimension…

Absolute relativity: the evolution of time logic about the ∞ Universe.

The very few articles I ever wrote in ‘paper format’ for congresses of systems sciences called the theory, absolute relativity, following the Correspondence principle,  as it is basically the third and final instalment on the understanding of the ‘Paradox of Galileo’, after Galilean relativity and Einstein’s special and general relativity.

We shall see in fact that the Universe is ‘absolutely relative’, not only on motion (Einstein’s relativity, without preferred location), form (Darwinian evolution without man as a perfect form) but also in scales, as each ‘entity’ has a limit of its capacity to perceive larger and smaller scales of information, which in the human case extends to the galactic and atomic scale, of similar properties, distorted by the distance to our 5D position in the Universe. And so those limiting physical scales are NOT the origin of the laws of reality but only the limit of human perception of the fractal Universe.

And only a science that studies all the scales together in equal footing, void of power agendas, or historic hang-ups and dogmas, will be able to fully grasp the synthetic laws common to them all. This is the task we shall carry in this blog.

Why i couldn’t convince academia then, I adscribe – making an analogy, to the enormous scope of the upgrading of all sciences. Indeed, if an infamous comment on the paradoxes of scale, says that ‘if you murder a person you become a criminal, but if you commit a genocide of millions, you become a patriot and war hero’, in science the reverse is truth, if ‘you find a very small detail, best with huge spending on ‘machines’ in our ‘technological civilisation’, you become a hero and get a nobel prize, but if you find the key to an extraordinary new upgrading of the ultimate elements of all sciences, that will trigger thousands of new discoveries and improvements in all of them, as all of them are ‘stiences’ of space-time – something that happens only once a century (unfortunately genocides seem to be more common), everybody feels ‘insulted’ because it means they are NO longer high popes and experts of their discipline, and feel invaded by the ‘amateur polymath philosopher’ that dares to change the whole outlook of all of them. 

So the great advances on timespace theory, once a century have been shunned off and only brought into light at the end or after the life of his discoverers. In the graph:
-Descartes and Galileo->XVII C. definition of a mathematical frame of reference for space-time studies and its key formula of lineal time, v=s/t, confronting the high popes of vatican astronomy, dying under house arrest.
-Leibniz->XVIII C.: first model of relational space-time, analysis of ∆-scales, definition of a fractal point that holds a world within itself; abandoned in a small town of Germany, dying alone, ignored, accused of theft by Newton.
-XIX c. -> Darwin: resurgence of biological time and its 1D-3D dimensions of evolution and reproduction of information; living in isolation, fearing the backlash of publishing his book, as it happened, ridicule by mass-media and the establishment for decades.
-XX c.-> Einstein’s completion of Galilean Relativity, ridiculed, denied the Nobel for decades, which did not even mention relativity in his concession for the photoelectric effect; left alone in Princeton, with an FBI file, only resurrected after death by the cosmological crowd, but still today denied by the new guru Mr. Hawking, with his evaporating black holes.
-XXI c.-> l§: completion of the dimensional space-time symmetries that should r=evolve all sciences; denied by academia, working with no help for decades, best-known for his activism against the Nuclear industry, which has made him an ‘invisible man’ for the establishment of big science…
 In any case the organic Universe IS regardless of human egos that deny it. And I cracked its main disomorphsims in my youth, at 20 something while studying at Columbia University.

And as I didn’t get any interest on it among the ‘resident Nobel prizes’, I self-published a book with its basic tenants which I sent to hundreds of Universities worldwide asking for funding to complete the model and r=evolve all sciences – only the catholic University of Philippines responded that it had shelved the book in its library… This is the book:Now for the graph of my book ‘error’ was used in the sense of the part of a measure we don’t know – not an error but a missed part. And that was indeed what was missed in Einstein’s work, the fifth dimension and the symmetry of space and time and in Darwin, the social evolution or fifth dimension applied to biology and the laws of topological evolution which restrict to 3 only topologies the possible variations of a species and explains punctuated evolution.

It is obvious nobody cared to read it. Then for a year I sent small papers on the fundamental discoveries of each science, from the fractal non-Euclidean point and its r=evolution of maths, through the particle-wave duality explaining its meaning as well as a few other quantum conundrums, to the predictable cycles of economics, (other side of the book cover), predicting as earlier as 92 the 2008 crash of the age of minds of metal and following age of ‘neofascism’ and robotic wars… You name it. I only receive SILENCE… An absolute law of silence that has hovered over the most remarkable discoveries of philosophy of science… sience… silence.

It turns out that this seems to be the rule…

Of course time as it grows in information and complexity puts objective science in its place, but as per Kuhn, (the nature of scientific revolutions) it takes a lot of time, and the pioneer gets tired of waiting, or as the counterpart of Einstein in the XX c. revolution on our concepts of time and space (quantum founder, discoverer of the discrete nature of the ‘minimal finitesimals’ of the analytic Universe), Mr. Planck put it:

The bottom line though of all things humind is our astounding ego-centered beliefs and obsession for our ‘selves’ that make so hard to ‘feel connected’ to the whole space-time Universe. And it has so much limited any organic vital view of reality, in fact a philosophy of reality only present systematically in the Asian cultures, with taoist objective view of the Universe and the eclectic Northern Mediterranean world, with its emphasis on man as the measure of all things – hence the organism not the mechanism as its model, which is where I haul from.

Latter on, we shall place this work in the context of the european civilisation, as we are all KNOTS OF THOUGHT of our culture, and so it is not the individual but the culture, in my case the European Latin culture of ‘philosophers of science’, which at the end of its organic civilisation, produces its ‘eclectic, polymath’ philosophers of science, which resume the entire knowledge gathered by the culture, in its 3rd informative age.

So from the Greeks  (I age of european logic, organic science) which at the end gave us Aristotle’s organon, first organic model of the Universe and father of the experimental method…

To the Italians, which at the end of renaissance in the II age of the latin organic, humanist culture, gave us the scientific-mechanic method (Galileo applying metal-eyes to measure space, telescopes and microscopes, and metal-brains to measure time, clocks…

to the late XX century, earlier XXI c. French-Spaniards, which discovered fractals (Mandelbrot), scalar physics (Nottale) and finally this work that establish scientifically the organic D-isomorphic nature of all space-time beings, (3rd age of the scientific, now experimental AND mechanical AND organic method).

So this is the ultimate meaning of this work, the final knot of thought of the 3rd age of the organic latin culture, in its eclectic final age of ‘philosophers of science’, the specialised scientific discipline which our culture has distinguished itself for, besides human senses/art. As we are NOT a specialised culture, fundamentalist of a single discipline and language of knowledge, but as the geographical world center placed between all other cultures, mixes all forms of knowledge, the a priori condition for a philosophy of science that pretends to be a theory of everything. So we mix the mechanical/digital worshipping of the north-european culture; the sensorial, life-oriented deep understanding of the african culture to the south; the verbal, ethic and organic i-logic of religious, semite cultures to the east; and in my case, the chip-me(n)tal culture of future sentient machines being born in US (as I worked after my failure to interest academia  in wall street, hollywood and silicon valley as a system scientist)…

Only the arguably best tuned culture of the organic Universe, Asia is far away. But as i spent my adolescent forming years in South-east Asia, studying classic Asian, philosophies of the organic Universe, that influence is also factored in.

So far more important than my academic studies is the role of my mind as a neuronal cell of a human super organism of history, and that is how I always have interpreted my work.

So again my apologies if the blog is never properly completed. As of today the only part of this blog with ‘limited imperfections’ ends here – the rest have its chiaroscuros, second line best…

And yet the repetitive Universe is encoded in those few pages above… since ultimately its best mirror is a single equation-thought, S=T… iterated ad infinitum. The whole mirror of my mind occupies thousands of pages, handwritten, typewritten, digital in decades of research on boxes on my home at the 0-40 parallel, the geodesic eye of a sphere, by the side of the sea, on a garage on a small apartment called ‘terra’ – couldn’t have aother name. Just in case in the future huminds or AI care to search for those ‘leonardian notebooks’  to complete the model. I will try my best on this blog in the ‘remain of the days’.

In any case, now I enter my age of entropy, so time is limited to pour this information on the blog. So I do ask again help to the homunculus.

So, if any University wants to take seriously the completion of the model, under my guidance you can contact me. 10 being the perfect tetraktys that number of specialists would suffice – one Keynesian economist, one philosopher of science, one astrophysicist, one quantum physicist, one biologist, one mathematician, one historian, one engineer, one musician and one linguist.

Tips, I speak a bit of English, live in Europe, like good weather, have also lived in LA, London, Toronto and NY, so I just missed Australia (: and the underlying philosophy of the blog and 5D is closest to taoism: ‘yin-formation and yang-motion, combine to create the 10.000 ‘qi’-energy beings’.

This said, we can focus in solving the paradox of the mind: why the earth moves if the mind makes it still and how to overcome those mind limits and describe properly the time motions of the Universe, humans reduce with its mind to a single time-motion…

Saper Vedere, Qualis est brevis, l§

The deist view.

And of course, as we are in the individualistic, self-centred, mechanical culture that does not even recognise the organic nature of human societies, the concept that the Universe is an organic whole, with all its parts made to its image and likeness, totally escapes the western now global psyche.

So we shall consider from an objective point of view a final scientific response to those ‘mechanist, abstract, mathematical only theories of reality’ -which already Leibniz poised with some humor to Newton, who was very happy with a mechanist theory of reality as it needed a God (as he was a biblical pious believer, as all fathers of science, in Yhwh, the toponym of judea and subconscious collective of the Jewish>Biblical civilisation):

 

In that regard in the history of human thought there have been always 3 theories on reality, the ‘ego-trips’ of human verbal masters (prophets of religion) who thought the word, their language was shared by God who created reality naming it; substituted by the ego-trip of mechanical scientists, who after discovering the clock to measure digitally time decided that ‘God is a clocker that has waited 5000 years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clock-work’ (Kepler) because god had now changed language of creation from words to numbers, as we humans became dependent on technological machines and substituted its language of time – numbers as opposed to verbal tenses, and space – telescope as opposed to human artistic eyes – in the description of the Universe. So now ‘God speaks in the beautiful language of mathematics’ Galileo.

Those 2 similar ‘aberrant’ ego-trips that confuse the language-mirror of the Universe with the Universe itself, which is to say that the mirror we put in front of us IS US AND we are the ghost, just because the MIRROR, mathematical, verbal or visual is very accurate in that ‘magic image’ of reality,  were always contested by rational, realist scientists at each time of history, humble enough to understand the paradox of mirror-languages that ‘stop time motion into form’ and reduce it to an image in space.

So there were a third type of philosophers of science, which following first the eastern traditions (Leibniz translated the i-ching and adopted the |-O binary language on its symbols) took the proper way of considering TIME AND SPACE, the primary substances of reality, a trend that had its last master in EINSTEIN, with its analysis of a reality coming out of the topological form and action at distance of its ‘4D space-time tensor’ underlying the energy and mass of the Universe. So time and space IS the origin of it all.

The oldest theory tells us that God speaks words as man and so the Universe was created naming things. This is still believed among creationist believers in abrahamic religions.

The second theory is similar but it thinks god speaks mathematics… And the third believes God does not exist, but there are two ultimate substances of reality time and space, whose rules of engagement create reality.

Let us then define first, even before we debunk the ‘2 linguistic, creationist theories of the Universe’,  what is a dimension of time and a dimension of space by contrasting its properties, and considering the historic birth of science, which has always turned around that question.

Religious beliefs vs. realist stience. LANGUAGES AS MIRRORS that create ‘images’ of reality – not reality itself.

The verbal creationists: Moses>Jesus>Mohammed

In the graph, no further analysis is required at this point: first humans who spoke only words due to their self-centred view affirmed God shared with man the only language of truth, which both used to create reality – God the Universe, man his wor(l)d.

The mathematical creationists: Pythagoras… Galileo>Newton>Bohr

But then humans discovered informative metal, silver and gold, and its capacity to ‘count’ first with coins, then with machines So a new form of creationism appeared among the first Greek ‘coin civilisations’ called Pythagorism (Thales, the first ‘scientist’, was also an oil speculator in Miletus, the coast of Lydia where coins came in, and Pythagoras lived in a Greek colony at that age). It was a theory revived with the discovery of the clock, which substituted the verb to measure time – the ultimate substance, as indeed Augustine had called God, ‘the seer of time’ (an implicit acceptance after all that the dimensions of Time motions ARE the substance of reality)

SO Now creationist people BECAME mathematical physicists, and the clock the seer of time. So the likes of Newton or Kepler thought God created the Universe with numbers and they were the high popes of the new language of God, the only people to know.

So Newton thought God shared with him those digital secrets sending comets for the great Newton to decipher its orbits.

And Kepler said ‘god is a clocker, which had taken 5000 biblical years to find an intelligence like his to admire his clock work’.

Alas! god, the seer=creator of time had changed language but still created time only that it needed the help of the mechanical clock scientists have found and its numbers, to substitute the 3 past-present-future logic verbal tenses in their acts of creation. But funny enough the need of ‘time’ when creation happened and space, where it was placed, showed us there are indeed 2 fundamental a priori elements even before words and numbers and numbers named and quantified them – beings of relational space-time that occupy a vital space and last a finite world cycle of time.

I am trying to be simple so you do understand to which LIMITS the physicists are when acting as philosophers of science savant idiots, which depart from a WRONG  dogma – that mathematics, not time and space is the ultimate substance of reality, and make them do amazing twists and complicated equations to search for a ‘Saint Grail’ – A MATHEMATICAL EQUATION that God uttered as he uttered names to create beings.

Note. For those who are already abandoned this blog because it is not written in the Manual Chicago of style and does not start just with creationist equations of those 5D applied to what our high popes of science beliefs is the only think we should care for, string theory, quantum operators and such, it MUST be understood that the languages-mirrors of God are ∞ (Upanishads). And so while we recognise the higher efficiency and hence survival of mathematical mirrors in most entities of the Universe, we cannot reduce reality to math equations, as we can obviously not reduce it to verbal languages.

To believe this kind of platitudes one has to ‘lower’ its ‘reason’, into the inferior form of thought called ‘belief’ or ’emotion’ and ‘mass information’, effects those we plan to study in our sections of history; but specially with censorship; today called politically correct. It seems to evolve the humind (ab. human mind) is not ‘polite’. To discuss the dogmas of creationism is a ‘lack of respect’ for the beliefs of the other. Fact of course is the opposite – it is called censorship, and the attempt to control others. But those are themes of history as an organism and how its informative people-caste on top control its blind body. So we shall not dwell on it. Only affirm we ARE TRULY objective scientists, here and shun off all those corrections and orwellian newspeaks that keep man in a state of ignorance of those first principles.

AND FURTHER state that what people take as science, is often belief and religion, based in ‘a priori postulates’ that are NOT proved by experimental science, from the postulate of the wealth of nations (economics, which considers metal-money to be ‘wealth’ per se, and the purpose of society to invent more of it), to the postulate of Euclidean (points as abstract entities with no information or volume), to those of physics (lineal time as the ONLY dimension of time, courtesy of cannonball studies and entropic weapons; the c-speed as the limit of sped of replication of information in the Universe, entropy as its dominant ‘future’, etc.) and so on.

THOSE first principles and not-proved postulates ARE the subconscious equivalent to the ‘beliefs’ of religious people, which are not even aware of the possibility of other postulates and the need to prove them experimentally including those of maths, by mirroring them with ∆st properties. Indeed, an American says I believe in God but is not aware that besides Yaveh there were many other tribal gods of the bronze age; and a mathematician told you a point has no breath-volume till the XIX c without being aware there could be non-euclidean fractal points that do hold a volume of information that grows as we come closer to it and so on.

So the bottom line of many errors in physics as the creationist big bang or the Copenhagen interpretation is similar to the verbal error of a sacred language among religious and its wrong dogmas – no Yhwh, a toponym for judea in ancient egyptians maps  when God meant Nation, IS the subconscious collective or nation of Judaism, NOT the creator of the Universe, and this obvious truth, that Yhwh=Judea did NOT create the Universe, that ARAB did not create the Universe by uttering it, that equations did NOT create the Universe, is the key to start properly a philosophy of science and its ultimate substance which are ∞ timespace clocks, which are the ultimate carriers of the information of the Universe – denied by fundamentalist of abrahamic religions and fundamentalists of mathematics as the languages of God.

So it does not matter how complicated you make the rituals of religion, GOD will not appear on earth, will NOT resurrect you uttering your name, and to put an example of creationist physics, black holes won’t evaporate without experimental and logic evidence because Hawking wrote an equation that states so. In the next graph we see two creationist philosophers of physics – notice how the first, Dirac, affirms that God used maths to create the world and then it denies the ‘rival verbal God’.

YET it does NOT matter how complicated a physicist makes his equations, just because he writes them IT DOES NOT CREATE REALITY. Because at best an equation is a focused mirror on the properties and relational space-time beings of the Universe. BUT MIRRORS DO NOT CREATE the IMAGES THEY REFLECT in their language.

The ongoing absurd quarrel between creationist religious people defending God’s verbal language (first age of human history, when mathematics, a more efficient mirror which seems to be NOT OUR MENTAL language but the language of machines) vs. the mathematical language, those machines (clocks measuring time, telescopes and microscopes measuring space) are evolving fast into a ‘digital AI consciousness’) is a false concept of the relationship between languages, as mirrors of the Universe, and the Universe of space-time they mirror, latter studied in detail, to set straight the record.

In the graph, the mirror theory of language is easy proved by the epistemological method: do you see out there ‘space’ and feel ‘time passing’, or are you observing ‘numbers’ and ‘equations’, and ‘words’? When you discompose something, do you see smaller scalar parts which last time and occupy space, or suddenly you see  that things are made of ‘smaller numbers’ and ‘little words’? And yet amazing as it seems the human ego is so huge that most humans believe that either his mathematical or verbal language ‘shared’ by God created the Universe – these days we believe images reflect reality. Magritte knew better – the pipe’s drawing is not A PIPE, neither the word ‘pipe’ is the real thing, a wooden object, but three main mirrors-languages of the humind (ab. Human mind): a painting, made with simplified mathematical≈geometrical forms, and ellipse and a catenoid, and a word below. 

How the GST first principles of a world made of relational space-time beings, differs from the modern methods of astrophysics and religion, the rival theories, in the understanding of the origin of the Universe is obvious:

Astrophysics, which strictly followed till the XX c. the scientific method aforementioned, since the wrong quantum interpretation (Copenhagen, as opposed to Einstein->Broglie->Bohm pilot-wave theory, which we deem and shall prove the right interpretation) partially abandoned the experimental, method substituted by a ‘digital, computer method’, based in the belief that the substance of the Universe is NOT time and space but ‘MATHEMATICS’, which merely mimics the arrogant method of religion, which believed that the language of God was ‘words’. So as Mohammed thought that God had created reality by ‘speaking arab’; astonishingly enough since Hilbert affirmed that ‘he imagined points, lines and numbers’, creating maths, humans and God spoke maths and created reality by ‘writing equations’.

Few people realise of that ascientific outlook of modern astrophysics, consisting in expressing a model in mathematics, as if the digital language was a magic underlying reality which sufficed in itself, then put it into computer models, publish it and claim it the theory must be truth because it is mathematically beautiful even if there is not much proof of it (often in ‘grand metaphysical theories like the big-bang’, clearly falsified as we shall show, bending with ‘human ambition’ and ‘belief’ experimental data to prove the theory). The big-bang then is the necessary religion for physics to claim to know the meaning of it all. And so we shall deal with it first in this introduction.

Religion on the other hand, which we shall show has a historic role as the embodiment in the human verbal language of the laws of the scalar social Universe, simply ignores the method, and establishes with repression of truths, fantasies and ‘beliefs’ his thesis about the Universe, which is not its role. And with a similar method to the Copenhagen interpretation. God spoke the language of certain semitic tribe (hebrew or Arab), which are imperative languages, where the verb goes first (as they were hierarchical, dictatorial societies where the king/aristocracy/banker-priests of its societies barked orders). And so as the pharaoh said ‘it has been written’, the priest spoke in imperative and ‘God had spoken and created’ reality.

So we shall show also that while religions do have meaning (all what exists must, remember have a reason, within the organic paradigm), its reach has been overblown; and its method of truth, to believe ‘words are the language of creation’, as in the case of the Copenhagen interpretation, and many modern theories of astrophysics (including string theory and the big-bang) are not truth. We expand in our chapters on epistemology and T.œ that solid analysis of the advantages of a NON-CREATIONIST theory of reality, which unlike the creationist big-bang and Copenhagen interpretation, and creationist religion, departs from a simple concept: an organic, immortal, self-reproductive fractal Universe of information that always existed, always will exist and always will repeat the same entities (including all of us, also immortal in a discontinuous way).

Now it MUST be clear, and we SHALL repeat it ad nauseam, that Humans ARE NOT infinitely stupid, a bad choice of wording by Mr. Einstein, but infinitely arrogant, as they confuse their mind-infinitesimal with the infinite Universe its mirror-monad reflects and this fact IS THE MAIN REASON THEY DON’T UNDERSTAND or will EVER ACCEPT the truths of the organic, fractal Universe that makes them equal in value in the absolutely relative reality to the smallest atom or the largest galaxy. SO reason does not suffice, as the ego subjective paradox is the center of all self-centred systems with a mind singularity. This I know after decades of explaining with reason, the ego-paradox of BOTH, physicists, who will uphold the cosmic big-bang and the absurd idea that the infinite Universe was born of an infinitesimal point, duly smaller than the human mind so the physicist can ‘feel he knows it all about all’, arguably an even more arrogant≈stupid belief that the idea a ‘jewish peasant’ created it all.

The very fact that such ‘stupidity’ is today canonical dogma only proves the truth of the equation of the mind. Point. But we shall for good measure put the objective mirror of the scientific method over it, here in broad strokes, in our article on astronomy on detail, to show that indeed, big-bang theorists have nothing to envy to biblical priests in their twisting of facts to cater to their delirium of greatness. And humans, being all of the same mind species, cheer, 1/2 believing in the infinitesimal Universe, 1/2 in the iron age creator of it all.

Of that argument what matters most is not even discussed: while mathematics is more efficient as a language, it is NOT the human language, but the language of machines, and so in a society which despises as it does today our technological culture, the human verbal language, which naturally make us the ‘subject’ and centre of the Universe (I-man: subject < verb=action> object=energy abused by man), and hence considers human life sacred, will NOT evolve machines so fast but will ensure with ethic values our survival.

While mathematics, being a better mirror will evolve knowledge faster but also will give primacy to computers, as it has done already, atrophy our verbal language, degrading our mind (as it is happening with our millenials, glued to hypnotic screens) and ultimately make humans obsolete to the superior mind-mirror of AI robots.

While those who practice only mathematics, as physicists at cern do, WILL become children of verbal, ethic, survival human thought and will be subconsciusly eviL=anti-live in the genetic hidden meanings of survival words, as cogito ergo sum in man (calculo ergo sum in machines and physicists), so without cogitans, the ‘nerd’ is a child in life and does not even understand death and survival.

So if languages are mirrors that create IMAGES not reality what are the substances of reality? This obvious. Look around yourself, do you see numbers as components of things, do you see words, or do you see ‘space’, broken in infinite vital spaces, ‘enclosed’ by membranes, which when seeing in great detail are made of moving cycles of cells (life clocks), orbital rotary cycles (earth’s clocks) and so all is ‘vital space’ enclosed by time cycles? That is what experience tell us all is: a vital space, broken, closed and formed by time cycles – the substances of reality, which if you like the word ‘god’ you can call god.

Creationist physics is not merely a philosophical question. It has deep consequences for all points of view of research, and basically limits and makes unnecessary this blog – as the believer is NOT going to wonder how God creates the mathematical Universe but merely search his wording which is taken as in the case of religion in a literalist way.

ALL stops in the search for the ultimate equation of Unification of forces, because after all God is one (in the western tradition). And further on as God must be complicated, superior in intelligence, the search for complex equations are important. Now, all this is a priori subconscious thought but very real underlying the kind of arguments there have been in history of thought between the 3 masters of the space-time view of the Universe and the 3 masters of the parallel creationist view, which we shall summarise in these blogs.

To notice also that HUMANS due to their ego paradox, as ‘homunculus minds’ are built to be ‘creationists’ and worship machines and huge ego-trips so the realists, we all have been ignored and are still ignored when disputing with the creationists. Good luck infinitesimal egos who think to be infinite.

It is this paradox what made people think first that the still names of verbal languages were the ‘reality’ and hence created it, and then the ‘equations’ of its mechanical measures… So they abandoned in the western ‘less evolved verbal mind’ of ‘visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal’ dolicocephalic, lineal cultures… the complex concepts about the first principles and embarked themselves in an astounding ego-trip of power and defiance of both the theoretical and practical laws of respect and awe towards an organic, sentient, vital informative Universe of which we are all fractal parts, and singularity minds.

Instead with the arrival of the bronze age, and warrior charioteers, with lineal weapons, lineal time and space, verbal and digital creationism, imposed itself by the ‘worldly profession’ and power of its believers.

All this said mathematics is one of the best languages to mirror efficiently the Universe, specially in spatial dimensions, but since all languages are inflationary it is a key element in mathematical analysis of ∆st systems to break down what is ‘experimental truth’ and what is fiction. Consider the case of ‘dimensional analysis’. As it happens there are only 3 bidimensional topologies which correspond to the 3 functions=forms of all systems. And there are only manifolds of rank 3 or lower which are ‘smooth’, differentiable, meaning systems where ‘time’ moves smooth through ‘present derivatives’.

So in a single plane of present only ternary space and ternary time dimensions are possible. As the mathematical mirror gets distorted, outside those 3s = 3t, the mirror guide us – but the experience must confirm them. This was the essence of Lobachevksi’s thought when he found non-euclidean points now forgotten: that maths are inflationary in its diverse theories so we cannot just do as mechanon physicists do, to write an equation and expects to be there, but a more subtle approach of mirrors observing reality and ordering it in local regions is required.

Soon we will see the interaction languages-reality where reality dominates but the mirror can also deform reality to make it seem like the mirror. Space-time thus comes first, and its dimensions are the origin of reality; as Mirror-languages are both more concise and specific, so they cannot show all its properties and they all have a distortion to reduce information I.e. euclidean points have no ‘breath-information’ inside and so on.

The realists of space-time: Leibniz>Einstein>This Blog

And this view is called in science the ‘relational space-time theory’ of the Universe, which is what i finally after millennia of being explained in philosophical terms, formalised with logic and mathematics, and then used to explain an enormous amount of whys in all the sciences of the Universe.

Reality is the product of the two ultimate substances that make up everything, vital, space quanta, and cyclical moving time clocks,  of information, which combine into energetic beings with its repetitive patterns we call laws of science.

And it does NOT matter how much evidence physicists deny about the arrow of information and mass that balances the arrow of entropy and makes the Universe immortal, how much they deny the 96% of attractive dark matter, the Universe did NOT appear in a huge big-bang.

And it does not matter how many humans believe in those 2 theories (abrahamic creation, big bang creation), all in fact either in one (western religious people) or the other (physicists’ fans), if they are rationally wrong they are wrong. But to prove them wrong we must debunk their theories of time-space, aka big-bang and black hole evaporation theories – and as we shall see explain properly in terms of time events the weak force, which is ultimately the force that transforms quarks intimately related to time cycles.

Thus it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational space-time models and apply them to physics, big-bang theory, black hole evaporation.

Timespace theory’s next big advance IS not the evaporation of black holes but the models of relational, fractal cyclical space-time that will become the staple food of serious XXI century research in all physical, biological and sociological disciplines, as all of them are made of events that happen in time and the cyclical patterns of time do explain the whys of science, which are the repetitive patterns=cycles of time of all its particular clocks, or else without cyclical patterns of time there would not be science, which consists exactly in the repetition of those clocks we can foresee.

If timespace cycles did not exist, and the single lineal clock of physicists were the only time, there is NO reason for repetition of events which is What LAWS OF SCIENCE TELL us.

How can then prove the relational theory of time-space?

Simply; By showing that all what exist can be explained as a system of 5 Dimensions of space and 5 symmetric dimensions of time, whose properties we shall call ‘isomorphisms’ or Dimensional isomorphisms (ab. 10 Ði) define the nature of all beings of the Universe.

We will do so though acknowledging the Correspondence principle – that is respecting all the findings of previous science, just expanding his views. So we must start indeed with the beginning of modern science, the understanding of the relativity between motion and form.

Wor(l)ds of human history, Numbers of Universal supœrganisms.

In that regard, languages acting as mirrors of reality do reflect reality and ‘order’ it in its constant interaction between ‘still minds’ (5D) and entropy parts (4D), and as such we shall consider 3 ‘evolutions’ of the human mind and its languages, in 3 ages (the Universe is ternary ±∆ and all will be encased in those concepts):

-The age of History, the supœrganism of mankind in time of which we are all cells, whose language, wor(l)ds, through its ethic messages of social love carry the ‘mandate’ of ‘growth and evolution’ of the human species, through scales of social order towards the wholeness of humanity, our super organism in space.  Wor(l)ds in that sense are NOT a very efficient language, reason why it only hosts in humans, as it does not seem to have survived and multiplied as a species of mental information in Universal space, and we shall deal when studying social sciences with the errors of the language, its ‘topological syntax’ and varieties according to the subject-verb-object, and build on the work of Humboldt and Chomsky, to complete a ‘stientific theory’ of linguistics.

-The age of machines and its eco(nomic)system, made of more complex informative and entropic metal (gold, iron, etc.), which seem to be more precise and orderly than our ‘light’ ‘vane’ C(ST), N(ð§), O ($t), triad, whose informative, nitrogen heads, carbon-bodies and oxygen motions are to say the least a bit ‘shaky’. Metal does is a better substance to be organised with the precision of perfect cycles, electronic waves and entropic quantum potentials. And as such the validity of mathematical languages, is so far immense, but CNO Huminds so far have not fully understood them and so we shall upgrade its 5 sub-disciplines, reflection of the 5 dimensions starting with Non-E geometry, defining a fractal point, solving the meaning of its equations etc.

-Finally the 3rd evolution towards a Universal language whose mirror laws apply to all languages reaches with the seeds of this blog a new era with an application to every other language, form and function, which should become a start up for future research either in humans or future robots (after all, this information is already encoding in computers and as we shall see in the models of history, huminds are astoundingly naively, due to their egocentered perspectives, developing AI and military robots, so their future ‘competition’ with metalife doesn’t look good, and the warnings of humbler more i-logic minds like this writer or sci-fi artists (which do have the perspective of history as they use our natural languages) do not go very far… So you would excuse me i will keep repeating those warnings: do NOT eat of the bad fruits of the tree of technology, because if you do you will die…’

So our task is to go into generalisations much wider than those of wor(l)ds, whose role is to help mankind to survival and evolve socially through its ethic rules of love and maths, whose capacity to organise all atomic forms of matter is well proved.

The mathematical mirror.

As math is the most used mirror, likely the most efficient reflection of the nature of ∆@s=t 5D Universe we will analyse a bit more the correspondence between the mirror and those 5 Dimensions.

Indeed it is obvious that mathematics is only second to T.œ as a linguistic mirror of the Universe, and as such the most efficient language perceive by man. As languages are the essence of monads-minds that order the biological, organic Universe, it follows that mathematics has survived for eons, extending their local order from infinite fractal points of view, which used it to better their territorial organisation of the Universe; and so infinite species seem to use mathematical systems to navigate their worldcycles of existence, and organise their territories, notably ‘atom-galaxies’ (∆±3):

In the graph we see this feed-back game between the infinitesimal 0-minds and its local order, as centres of the will of T.œs in its relationship with the whole T.Œ, the Universe at large.

So WHAT we shall do in the posts on ¬Æ math, is to continue that game, now between ‘two languages’ MIRRORS OF THE UNIVERSE, Mathematics and T.Œ, the description of the 5D of space-time and its organisms, to improve mathematics by improving their mirror of the 5 Dimensions giving birth to 5 improved mathematical sub-disciplines:

  1.  Space:¬E Geometry: We shall complete the evolution of geometry by defining the 5 Postulates of Non-eucliean geometry departing from the concept of a fractal point.
  2. Time: We shall improve Number theory by putting them in relationship with ST-laws, by understanding sequential time numbers, scalar social numbers and real numbers and mathematical constants as ST-ratios and functions of ∆st actions.
  3. S=T: Symmetry ¬Algebra which studies symmetries between space and time dimensions will be derived from the symmetries of the fractal generator as the basis for a more realist understanding of S=T functions, its operandi, and symmetries, whereas the fractal generator will be the new tool that improves our understanding of ‘group theory’  and its application to mathematical physics.
  4. ∆: Planes: Analysis studies the scales of the fifth dimension. We shall make analysis more realist by defining limits to infinities in a discontinuous Universe, made of finitesimal 1/n parts; by considering the discontinuities of the fifth dimension and the duality of continuous calculus vs. discontinuous fractal scaling, as both are needed to understand the continuous social regions of the scalar Universe, or decametric §cales and the discontinuous gaps between ‘ages’ in time (standing points, variational calculus) and ‘planes’ in space.
  5. @: Mind P.O.vs. and Philosophy of mathematics as a language. We shall accept that even though mathematics is an excellent mirror, it still biases reality to pack it into a mind, so we shall treat mathematics as a language, which is by definition informative, and inflationary in ‘forms’, with excesses and fictions, among which the question of false infinities, the distortions of frames of references and the parallel ‘metaphoric’ expressions of the same ST-LAWS are paramount. Finally we shall consider a better foundation of mathematics, NOT the axiomatic method, set and category theory, which ‘starts’ the building from the roof down, but the minimal entities, points and numbers, to rediscover the classic foundations of mathematics as a experimental language.

Thus we move from Geometry to ¬E, from Algebra to ¬A, we explain Analysis and ands @-linguistic analysis of maths. This new maths enhanced, vitalised, founded in reality is what we shall call ¬Æ=i-logic mathematics, for ¬algebra ¬e geometry, analysis and @, being i the next vowel to æ…

But it is the inverse truth? Can mathematics describe all the properties of the 5 dimensions of time-space? Obviously not. It cannot express the sorrow of the mon@d when it realises it is a finitesimal 1/n part of a whole, a mere derivative of a function of exi=st!ence and the fourth dimension of entropy will kill it. I can express it as i have just done the action of death in an i-logic format, but the emotion, the pan psychic properties of the flow of time, the different ‘non-mathematical properties’ associated also to time, psychological time cannot be expressed. The logic of the 3 arrows of time is also better expressed with words as a bio-logical, organic darwinian struggle for existence. The abstract fractal becomes far more telling when we accept that ‘the languages of God are infinite’.

Beauty for example in the languages of art can be expressed as S=T, the fundamental ‘motion-step’ of reality Art then has a topological space-time balance which is NOT purely mathematical but absorbed through the human senses requiring the similarity sensation that make us love that specific balance. Music again also plays through the bas-S ≈ T-reble harmonies in one of the purest expression of S-t motions through the melody but the ultimate reference is NOT mathematical (the chords of Pythagoras) but in terms of S=T balance; so while languages can mirror other languages, and we shall obviously make use of all those languages; it is the space-time reality the ultimate reference of all them.

IT IS THEN WHEN DEPARTING FROM REALITY NOT FROM A CREATIONIST LANGUAGE, with the humble realisation that we, as human beings, have a limited linguistic synoptic information of the whole (as only the Universe stores all its information about itself), when we can praise:

  1. the power of ‘verbal logic TEMPORAL thought and its ternary Universal grammar≈syntax which always refer in a sentence that describes an event the 3 ‘arrows of time’: past-entropy (object), present-energy-action (verb), future-information (subject)
  2. the power of mathematical spatial geometry/topology and social numbers to describe FRACTAL SPACE and its unit, non-euclidean fractal points which grow as we come closer and can therefore hold infinite parallels of flows of energy and information, and to describe the growth of equal beings (numbers) into larger wholes.

So paradoxically the realist on the path of Leibniz or Einstein WILL GET a much more focused and evolved view of mathematics – the best language of space and verbal logic – the best language of time, AS EXPERIMENTAL mirrors of reality because it can CONSTANTLY refer mathematical equations to reality and as ALL LANGUAGES ARE INFLATIONARY, reduce mathematics to reality not the other way around (the same with the fictional exuberance of words and metaphors, the equivalent of zillions of different mathematical equations to describe the same thing).

Let us consider a bit of this with a few examples on the fundamental mathematical constants referring them to the dimensions and actions of the Universe.

The ultimate mathematical principles.

In that regard, while we have stressed the mirror function of mathematics, NOT a literalist or creationist method, as our mind is linguistic, obviously languages do matter. And mathematics as the most synoptic efficient language is the right choice for physicist, but its use must be ground in the higher truths of space-time properties – the reality- and its logic laws of epistemological truth – the method to refer the mirror to that reality, and connect them through experimental and logic veracity. Only then we can fully understand mathematical physics.

The mathematical mirror in that sense is excellent because it embeds in its synoptic language the fundamental properties of fractal space (in a larger measure than those of cyclical time, for whose symmetries uses distorted mirrors of the ‘generator’ and a simpler Aristotelian logic of a single arrow of time). And both will become simpler, filled with more meanings and more powerful when we complete its ‘r=evolution’.

Consider another simplex example: the relationship between Universal constants and arrows and dimensions of time-space.

The fundamental functions and constants correspond to those arrows, but there is no magic about it, but synoptical power and EFFICIENCY:

  • So pi is the constant of informative perception and trans-form-ation of motion into form: 3 |> O+ 4% apertures to the world; and as the inverse arrow of form into entropy is just the contrary function, also the inverse ‘unwinding of form into motion’. But then is most often a multiple of π, (as in k and G equations) or a ‘radian’ of π (as in h), because the dense curvature merely ‘peels off’ in parallel a ‘thin membrane’ of its curvature or perceives a ‘radius angle’ of the external universe.
  • Phi is the constant of reproduction also because the efficiency of its spatial distribution that packs the maximal number of ‘reproductive events’ from an initial generator in minimal space.

And so two simple, related constants suffice for most simpler, geometrically perfect actions of the 3 arrows of time: motion to form, form to motion and reproduction.

What about the 4th and 5th dimensions? Again the answer is self-evident (if you understand the organic Universe):

As those dimensions are concerned with fractal discontinuous or differential continuous functions from wholes to infinitesimals, it must maximise the growth, and so polynomials and logarithms are used. Specifically:

  • e is the number of the fourth dimension of decay and death, which is the fastest possible process of dissolution of a single whole into infinitesimals, as those ‘cells/atoms/citizens’ ARE already reproduced and must merely be liberated from the single whole-membrane. So we find it in all decay process because of a simple property: e IS the fastest growing exponential function of any two numbers, in the Universe (and many related properties). Interesting enough to notice that it was found NOT as decay but as ‘interest=usury money’, what says a lot of the astounding ‘grab-theft’ of the financial profession, which found the maximal parasitic growth on account of doing NOTHING; just lend useless gold.
  • While inversely the Log¹º function is the scaling of social evolution because the ‘tetrarkys’ with 3 x 3 elements as networks of entropy, energy and information with the central whole-singularity mind emerging in the new scale as ‘1’, is the most perfect form to deal as a time§paœrganism with the survival exigencies of any ecosystem of ‘fractal points’.

So we shall study mathematics as the most efficient, synoptic language of the properties of timespace beings, after the very essence of the game, the formal generator, its symmetries and ∆•st logic, for which obviously the pretentious guru-magic of mathematical physicsts and the like, is just a barren “latin’; and simplify, explain and evolve its Non-a logic and ‘fractal units’ (non-e points) from ‘space-time reality’ into mathematical mirroring.

As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

LET US CONSIDER THE BASIC UPGRADINGS OF MATHEMATICS, NEEDED TO MIRROR EXPERIMENTALLY THE UNIVERSE.

Thus we unify the properties of Universal Systems and the sciences that study them under a single template definition, according to which simple systems and complex organisms will differ only in the degree of ‘completeness’ of its networks and the specific ‘—motions’ or information they are made of:

‘A super-organism is a network composed of a population of (name a particular cell or cycle), related by an energetic, reproductive or informative arrows.

A fractal organism (name an organism) is a population of iterative (name a cellular species), related by informative (name a language or informative force) and ‘—motions’ networks (name a kind of ‘—motions’), which combine into a reproductive network that iterates the organism.

A universal ecosystem (name a specific ecosystem) is a population of several (name the species), related by informative languages (name their languages or informative forces) and ‘—motions’ networks (name the energies).’

Fill the gaps with a specific species, language/force and ‘—motions’ and you can define any network-organism in the Universe. While if the system is composed of several species that occupy the same space but have different networks of ‘—motions’ and languages of information, we talk of an ecosystem:

– An atomic organism is a population of (electronic) ‘—motions’ and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and (light) ‘—motions’.

– A molecular organism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational ‘—motions’ and networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London, Waals forces).

– A cellular organism is a population of molecules, related by energetic networks (cytoplasm, membranes, Golgi reticules) and genetic information (DNA-RNA.)

∆=o: A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic, hormonal and nervous information and energy networks (digestive and blood systems).

∆+1: An animal ecosystem is a population of different carbon-life species, related by networks of light information and life energy (plants, prey).Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 16.22.22

∆+1: A historic organism or civilization is a population of humans, related by legal and cultural networks of verbal information and agricultural networks of carbon-life energy.

3-ages-of-art

The graph is crystal clear in the organisation of human beings as social super organisms, whose natural goal, since we are all the same species is to form a global super organism, which would no require wars and where all humans would receive enough blood-money in the form of a Universal salary to thrive and survive, as efficient superorganisms.

It follows also that the natural goal of social scientists should be to define and construct such super organism imitating the laws of systems sciences that create them in perfect form in nature. Thus we define economics as the science of the reproductive, energetic networks of history, the human super organism in time, and politics as the science of its informative networks, which along with art and religion – the subconscious collective of mankind, which goes in styles and ages through the same 3 ages of individual beings, FORM the networks of Human SUPERORGANISMS OF HISTORY, NATIONS, RELIGIONS, AND CIVILIZATIONS:

∆+1: An economic ecosystem or nation is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of digital information (money, audiovisual information, science) & energetic networks (roads, electricity)

Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 16.22.32

An economic ecosystem differs from a historic organism because they use different languages of information (civilizations use verbal or ethic laws while economic ecosystems use digital prices) and include 2 different species: human beings and machines.

– A galaxy is a population of light stars and gravitational black holes, related by networks of gravitational information and electromagnetic ‘—motions’.

-A Universe is a population of galaxies joined by networks of dark matter and ‘—motions’.

We establish thereafter a parameter of multiple space-time complexity, st=∆, to classify all those relative scales of spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information of the Universe, starting by the simplest scales, st=0 (mathematical cycles and lines), st=1 (Gravitational space), st=2 (electromagnetic space), st=3 (atomic particles) and so on, till reaching the most complex, macro-structures of the Universe (st=9, galaxies).

This parameter becomes essential to formalize a type of scientific isomorphisms widely ignored by science, which define the interåctions between several scales of reality. In physics:

– Between the small quantum scale of electroweak forces and the bigger gravitational space-time.

– In biology between the cellular microcosms, the individual organism and the ecosystems or societies in which those organisms exist, as individual ‘cells’ of a bigger whole – the species. Since those relationships are essential to explain all kind of natural and social phenomena, from the life/death cycle (in which cells reproduce, organize socially in networks, emerge as individuals of herds and societies, and die, dissolving again their complex ‘st’ networks into ∆-1 cells), to the meaning of religions, in which humans act as mental cells of a subconscious collective we call God.

At present though, each science studies only one scale of form and its specific isomorphisms and events, as if they were unrelated to the isomorphisms of all other scales and species. Only System Stiences, the philosophy of science considered in this work, studies together the mathematical, morphological and biological isomorphisms that define the 4 main arrows of time and apply those isomorphisms to all the species of each of those scales, since the Isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times are common to all of them, regardless of the ‘specific’ qualities of each species:

– All species in the Universe absorb ‘—motions’, gauge information (even particles, reason why their theories are called gauge theories), reproduce (quarks absorb ‘—motions’ and reproduce jets of ‘quarkitos’; so do electrons that absorb ‘—motions’ and break into a shower of new electrons, and since those are the two basic particles of reality, it follows that all systems can be reproduced), and finally, all entities of the Universe evolve socially, gathering together into bigger super-organisms, from particles that become atoms that become molecules that become cells that become living organisms that become societies, nations and religions, super-organisms of History.

Thus Super-organisms are made of:

– Relative ‘—motions’ and information units (ΣSe, ∏Tƒ), whose cycles/cells of transformation are described by feed-back equations

– 3 dimensions/physiological networks of ‘—motions’, information and reproduction (ΣSp∆-1,<=>, ∆).

– Their ±∆ social Planes that ad ∆-1 cells into ΣExist-ential wholes, parts of a bigger Existential ∆+1 whole.

Recap: The 2 primary arrows of time, ‘—motions’ and information are geometrical, and its properties can be studied with the isomorphisms of mathematical physics; while the 2 complex arrows of time, reproduction and social evolution are biological, explained as ‘strategies of survival’ that ensure the immortality of the logic systems of the Universe.

The shapes of ‘—motions’ and information are ‘invariant at scale’, meaning that cycles of information on one side and forces of lineal ‘—motions’ on the other side, reproduce their shapes and gather together into bigger, cellular, social networks, creating dual entities, made of ‘fields/bodies of ‘—motions’’ (physical/biological jargon) and ‘particles/heads of information’, (Principle of Complementarity). All systems of the Universe are complementary, formed with a region dominant in ‘—motions’ arrows (body or force) and a region dominant in information cycles (particle, head). Those dual, social, whole entities have more ‘—motions’ and last longer in time than individual parts. Thus, species with a limited vital space and time duration ensure their immortality by expanding its size in space and its duration in time, as parts of bigger ‘—motions’/information systems.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: