Home » ·&9planes:

·&9planes:

±∞ ¬∆@ST:

 SUMMARY: ∆±¡

Ξ

  1. Planes of exist¡ence.
  2. 9 Planes of the Universe: physical, biological and social Planes.

Foreword:

The  4th line: self-centered 9 planes of exist¡ence.

We introduce the 9 Ƽ planes of existence; which will be studied in the 4th line.

Those planes of existence are 9 ±4 around the ∆º plane of the self.

GST PROPERITES

The study of a Universe made of fractal scales of cyclical time space, introduces a priori organic vital and sentient properties, ignored by present science, and better described with tense verbs (the 3 ages of time and its causality) and 5D logic metric equations (the laws of scales) and biology (darwinian survival, organic laws, physiological networks). In that sense mathematical languages work better for the fine detail and how, but the why requires those other properties and languages, including the metalinguistic analysis of its ‘mathematical membrains’ and its mirrors.organic=scalar properties as the system extends through various ∆§ planes, and cyclical time properties, as its time clocks will have a limited duration, ending as a zero sum of energy. Finally to be able to perform a survival program of 5 Dimotions of existence, it requires to gauge information with an apperceptive, self-centered @-mind, whose ∆ø still language maps all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms & world cycles into an infinitesimal Non-E point, mirror of the larger world:  0 §@ x ∞ ð= World. Hence the creation of infinitesimal ∆º minds-worlds, or Leibnizian monads, which reduce a larger ∆+1 reality to its relative mapping, which is the origin of its ∆§calar planes, connected ‘perpendicularly’ through those @-minds, acting in physics as ‘centers of changes and masses’ wormholes of flows of entropy that become in the @-mind information, that perceives in itself.

THEY FORM an open ball for the self-centered mæn (anthropic-entropic huminds, who see reality with him @ its center)… WHICH only truly perceives the ∆±3 planes for the atom to the galaxy, in which the Decalogic of its ²worldcycles takes place.

The 4th plane, the cosmos is beyond the galaxy and we ignore all about it, as our horizon cannot see beyond its symmetry with light quanta (10¹¹), and the same can be said of the invisible forces of quantum potentials that entangle at relative ∞ speed -4>c, its ‘finitesimal ¼ parts’ (in ¬Ænalysis, a finitesimal is the minimal part of a whole, and we adopt Leibniz’s formula, 1/n; hence the finitesimal forces of the upper nested cosmos or fourth plane will be 1/4th).

So the fourth line is really between -3 electronic light and +3 star galaxies. And again the symbols displayed obey to the creative playful use of mystique English but also to the constrains of fitting all the posts entangled in each line within the space provided by WordPress. It is all however a bit of a riddle.

So Gaia is the Earth, Gala which seems to be written the same is the ∆+1:Galaxy; ∆-1:Galatom; ∆º:Galacell, perceived from its 3 perspectives.

The first letters belong to 3 infinitesimals of the nested larger Universe, so a simple symbol suffices, ¥ for the electron and its light bundles of h-plancktons (photons), Z for the atom and its ‘atomic numbers’; and ν or >c, for the ¼ background scale of neutrinos, likely the quanta of the intergalactic space of the cosmos; which we place together to stress the nested relative infinite/finitesimal structure of al those dual Planes; to close the 4th line introduced in these posts – this dedicated to social scales, and ’10 planes’ to those ∆-planes proper; with the logic of the game, the mind of god; since we DO NOT want to end with the concept of a physical ‘visual universe’, but with the much larger truth for an evolved mind that he EXISTS in a game of logic survival actions, in a game of existence and minds-mirrors, of intelligent motions, NOT of shallow mæn’s pictures and physicists pretending to know it all.

So while the cosmos in indeterminate beyond the galactic known-known, the whole reality is ultimately cyclical and closed by the 10th, infinite scale of the ¡logic mind of the Universe, God, which we write following the ‘creative mystical use of the Inglish language – in an attempt to break Nietzsche’s dictum that English was impossible to write philosophy – with Greek Letters as Γ∞∆; the generator of space time, G=Γ; the only absolute infinity, which is not quantifiable, unlike the relative  of all other planes and worlds, and its ∆-planes of existence.

The Planes of exist¡ence perceived by ∆º huminds.

In the Fourth Line,  we shall study in greater detail each Plane of Existence of the Humind’s perceived Universe between the invisible force of ∆-4 gravitation and the partially perceived ∆+4 galactic cosmos.

We do so unlike in the second line, where we focused in the spatial super organisms as a whole closer to the mainstream analysis of reality by humind sciences, strictu senso, without concessions to the gallery by describing the world cycle of those super organisms through the Ðisomorphic method; which means to study:

  • ∆§: Its new spatial qualities as a super organism co-existing in 3 scales, the ∆-1 atomic/cellular/individual scale (physic, biologic, social system), the ∆º organic thermodynamic scale and the ∆+1cosmologic, gravitational world in which the system exists; made of 3 topologic parts, $-potential/limbs<ST-bodywaves>-ð particle-heads.
  • S=T: Its new temporal properties as a world cycle of existence that orders its 5 Dimotion in time in 3 scales of temporal duration; in steps that form its actions; in worldcycles and as a member of a larger set of species that go through 3 horizons of evolutions.
  • 5й¹: Put together in detail, in the dynamic display of the system as it is seeded by a mind or informative still seed, which will reproduce, evolve and emerge in its ‘generative’ cycle as a larger whole, part of that world where it will perform its 5 Dimotions=actions of the program of existence to survive through reproduction, in a social world of scales, till entropy sets in and the organism dies.

Thus we subdivide the 3rd line in a central post that summarizes the ’11 Disomorphic set of properties’ of the being which in a dynamic manner express its temporal world cycle of existence as a scalar, fractal spatial superorganism; and then we summarize its world cycle in time and super organism in space in two other posts; with secondary subposts that might study specific species, ages of its worldcycles or organic parts of the super organism, in time, space and scale.

We shall thus in those post summarize the 5й¹isomorphisms of the Earth,  in  its ternary scales, topologic forms and temporal ages, in a dynamic causal way as all ‘entities’ are Generated by a seed-mind that first perceives and develops the being as a mirror of the information it codes within its self.

This post will introduce those ∆±4 planes of existence that huminds perceive, symetrically in scale. As they are the planes the humind needs to perform its existential actions:

The oldest graph of 5Ð: Human ¡±4 perceived planes

The Seed-mind that orders and starts it all.

Let us then consider first what is the Humind, in the context of other minds in the Universe, and its restricted linguistic perception of the whole:

A being starts always from a first seed or mind able to absorb forces to replicate its inner information, projected as a still language that reduces the enlarged external world to the mapping of the inner ‘monad’.

In an active mind that still mapping will guide the actions of the being; in an informative seed, the mapping will be replicated in the outer world, in clone beings starting a radiation of similar ‘cells’ that will become a larger whole.

In that second case the ‘seed/mind’ of information starts a full process of existence and creation of an organic territory with 3 ternary physiological networks, emerging in the larger ∆+1 world where it will play  once more the game of exist¡ence albeit as a mere point within that larger ∆+1 performing symbiotic cycles within it:

We have so far considered the Universe in its fundamental principles – the topological adjacent construction in simultaneity of super organisms, which sequentially will live a world cycle, ‘traveling’ through 3 planes of the fifth dimension. Neat and simple, that is really what there is to it. Minds though, mirror those infinite worldcycles of existence of other space-time super organisms with languages ‘stopping’ them into a mapping that allows them to ‘perceive=gauge=sense‘ information.

And we highlight sense because a ‘still mapping’ sense in each stopping, locked ‘crystal image’ a measure of its self. The sentient Universe can only be ultimately explained if ‘perception’ exists within the language, as when you think words, you sense words, when your eye sees light and maps into an electronic mapping you are seeing. And when an atom maps a geometric image in its ‘locked’ ‘stopped’ spin, it must perceive that geometry as information.

Minds thus are infinitesimal points-particles that stop, gauge, perceive, and move – and then we have the sensation of motion-pleasure.

This of course is not within the realm of the scientific method. You cannot measure those sensations of awareness-pain vs. pleasure-dissolution, in-form-ation, pressure vs. release-entropy ONLY sense them as humans. So if we had first a difficult hurdle to cross trying to prove the existence of minds but passed it objectively by considering a mind-singularity to hold the will of existence of a T.œ – hence as invisible gravitation shows in its external effect, so will the existence of a singularity through its external actions; at the final level of ‘human awareness’ of the game of existence – sensations of the dual pain-pleasure reward system (with all its parallel and perpendicular events/sensations) there is ONLY a justification to the existence of other minds – that we humans are made of the same substances that all those other minds, space and time, and hence what we sense other atomic systems must.

Therefore IF OUR LAST REWARD is the flow of sensations, with its duality pain-pleasure, hate-love, etc. which we can easily ascribe to geometrical perpendicular (cut, pain) parallel (friction pleasure) properties and many other dualities we have established for all systems, IT MUST EXIST IN ALL OTHER SYSTEMS of space-time. That is, atoms must feel pain when op-pressed by huge masses, pleasure when released in entropy, but also ‘awareness’ of a more complex inner still image, when flows of information converge through forces in its non-euclidean singularity; and so it is only left then 2 questions:

  1. What are those sensations? Answer: the very essence of time as a motion/flow. Motion in itself seems evanescent; as sensations are… Yet combining them, this flow of sensation-motion becomes very likely the ultimate program-will for all T.œs to exist – the ultimate, ‘Dasein’, ‘being in time’.
  2. Yet we cannot go beyond this, as this is the ultimate ‘reference’ of reality we have as humans. So there is no MORE methods of knowledge beyond what it is contained in our ‘selves’. Know yourself, the method of knowledge of Aristotle; ‘saper vedere’, the method of Leonardo and know how to see and calculate with attached machines, the method of Galileo, to which we have added a few ‘tricks’ thus completes the capacity to probe reality. Are there more layers beyond motion as sensation in time? We cannot answer. We don’t know. As all is relative, in the same manner we can only probe into ∆±3 planes around our ∆º and hint by force of motion the existence of an invisible gravitational/cosmological plane at ∆±4 but no more, beyond the duality of sensation, there is nowhere else to go.

So as we cannot go beyond, and we must start in the seed of information to construct the being, in the mind-mapping to study its generation, and limit ourselves to 9 ‘open planes’, from our ∆º perspective, that is all what will be explored in the final line, with all the languages/mappings of mankind, departing always through the Disomorphic generational process that starts in a first mind/seed that wants to exist and order, as the graph above shows, a territory that will become its body, in which it will project across its ∆±4 planes its Dasein, its being in time. And this is the method: to locate in each plane the key singularity-mind points and then to unfold how they originate their inner and outer ∆±i world:

The Universe is a system, probably closed as decametric planes repeat each other, meaning the singularity or 11 dimension and the membrane or 10 dimension are all equal, image of the mind and Universe it reflects in the membrane distorted view but we are all open balls in the scales we perceive, hence self-centered in our I-point, we see above and below, on the planes we act, ∆±4; where we perform social actions, ∆±1 and reproductive actions, the complex actions of the being, and the lower actions of feeding, ∆±2, perceiving, ∆±3 and moving, ∆±4 in a marvelous simple scheme fundamental theorem of 5D metric:

A self-centered O-singularity or mind, ∆ø, acts in ∆±4 actions around its still, perceptive scale, ∆ø.

The self-centered planes of stience.

The next element of reality’s description of any being thus departs from an ∆º mind once more but now it does NOT study its flow of time; nor its control of its adjacent parts (iterative bodywave and potential limbs of entropic motions) but its connections with its lower and upper planes in which it will be entangled through its actions. So this is the ‘3rd view’ of the Mind’s control of a scalar, fractal reality built around it, in time, space and scale (so another Rashomon method is precisely to consider those four elements and its connecting i-logic operandi: ∆ð±¡≤≥§@, as a description of the organism within the world).

In the next graph thus we see the specific field of our inquire, the humind and its entanglement with different scales of the Universe, as it is really all what we hominids can talk about, both in a flow chart of scales and flat structural view.

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, according to scale of size, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimensions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales.Stiences are limited by the fact the ‘humind’, ∆ø, is the self-centered origin of all information available to us, as the singularity of a scalar ‘open ball’ of perception, where the outer limits of reality are not met. So huminds perceive ∆±4 planes of a likely ∞ reality, above and below, in a different way as the 5th dimension is NOT symmetric: i.e. we do not perceive as much information from larger systems of slower clocks and invisible networks than we perceive of lower planes which our mind uses to obtain bits and bites of energy and information. So ultimately perception and knowledge are also functions of the needs of the human Time space organism that orders a microcosms which he understands better than the above macrocosms that order us.

The study of all those planes of reality perceived by a single mind in that sense is this final Disomorphism, the one we shall study here, as it defines the limits of the perception and interaction of any super organism, with a relative self-center, ∆º, which he will consider the ‘centre’ of the Universe, relating to lower and upper planes to extract from the forces of motion, bits of information, bites of energy, seeds of reproduction and above him it will perceive a social ∆§º:

In the graph, the Scalar Universe in which it will grow with similar beings to be stronger in its ∆+1 world part of a larger series of ‘nested’ Russian dolls, symmetric ‘above him’ with the lower ‘smaller’ bits, bites and quanta of force he uses to feed, perceive and move.

The 3 key logic dualities of motion vs. stillness continuity vs. discontinuity, open, free vs. closed ordered and deterministic, connected to the open flat vs. closed curve intimately related to the concepts of infinity vs. limit and determinism vs. freedom illustrated by Saturn’s ring. We call those dualities the Galilean paradoxes.

How many of those planes can the being see/perceive? A closed Universe of ’11 planes’ that includes the ‘two’ dimensions of the ‘mebrain’ (singularity and membrane) or an open ball of 9? This esoteric question has many deep implications in the ‘duality’ between open and closed, free and ordered, infinite and finite, plane or sphere… description of realities, worlds and Universes, we have barely touched with a concept called the ‘Galilean paradoxes’ illustrated with a graph of Saturn’s rings that seem both flat but spherical IN detail, where also its discontinuity breaks, and according to perspective of size a ring from above or a far away plane for a microscopic being…

But so far regarding the human being, we do see only 9 scales in an open Universe. Let us explain this in more detail.

From humind’s monologic to pentalogic in space (¬∆@st) and time (5Dimotions) to Decalogic of 2 worldcycles. 

We are monads that hold worlds, mirror-perspectives of a mind over the whole, but we are not the whole much more complex and infinite in size and duration relative to the mind.

The mind we might say is a single ray with an origin and an end on that infinite horizon. Its mirror is shallow with less dimensions; specially those of time, as each point has its own time cycles. So the mind is orientated in his own time direction. The humind expresses its time view decoding the Universe into a single lineal parametrical language, verbal symbols that have a lineal syntax, where the subject man, comes first as we read in ‘lines’.

The mind is thus an infinitesimal lineal reduction; and even so its time speed of processing information of the whole spatial infinity it portrays in increasingly reduced forms till reaching the syntax flow of its primary language, goes much slower – as an electric current – than the maximal c-speed of our world. So even a computer that sees lineal codes of 0101 numbers in virtual minds of more complex atomic nature outpace enormously the words of humans.

In essence this means our perception of reality has huge shortcoming analyzed in our increasing analysis of the entangled Universe, departing from the simplex monologic of lineal time, huminds mostly use to describe all the planes of stience. We shall attempt a much wider level of understanding, with pentalogic analysis of the 5 Dimotions of time-space in its 3 ‘scales of time’, that of minimal actions of survival, that of the ages of existence of individual systems and that of the Horizons of its world, or relative past, present and future beyond which the ∆º mind has little to say. We will also often infer the properties of the being by studying its 5 elements, loosely related to those Dimotions, as ¬∆@st, Dust of space-time. And finally we will use the Decalogic required to explain the full world cycle of the being as it is a dual transit from its initial 0-1 time sphere of palingenetic emergence into the ¡-world in which it will live a less ordered life towards its 0-sum death.

 

T.œs’ Decalogic. Its isomorphic properties in vital, sequential dual worldcycles.

Any ∆º being co-exists with ∆±4 planes above and below to perform the actions the superorganism made to survive by exchanging bits and bites, steps and stops of energy, motion and form, or 5 ‘dimotions’ of existence with multiple ∆±¡ systems found in those planes.

That is in the scalar Universe, each larger Spe being, needs under 5D metric to be ultimately made of smallish ðƒ quanta. So if we absorb gravitational motion on the ∆-4 scale, this quanta of forces must be part of a hyper-Universal super organism beyond our galactic island-universe. If we obtain ∆-3 bits of photonic light to perceive information, those ∆-3 bits must be part of a larger ∆+3 galaxy as its background space-time; and if we absorb ∆-2 amino acids, they must be part of an ∆+2 planetary ecosystem – the membrain of Earth.
So the 9th Isomorphism considers the being self-centred around ∆±4 Planes, but it follows also from this definition that if we were a much larger being, let us say a galaxy, the ‘distance’ between our ∆-planes would be huge, since our ‘minimal cells’ would be light-quanta, so probably if we were a galactic scientist we would be talking of a level of scales perceived by the Galaxy well beyond our wildest imagination – themes those treated in the posts on metaphysics.

The limits of human perception – we see a Universe as an open ball.

It IS then evident that we do not see the whole but only its open ball. So the 10th  and 11th dimensions of the being, its singularity and membrane is beyond the perception of the 3 x 3 scalar internal parts and its symmetries with time ages and spatial, synchronous parts (which mathematical mirrors in space can treat in algebraic:S≈ð≈∆nalysis SYMMETRIES).

Reason why the last Disomorphism (the planes of existence of the system), is the 9th, not the 10th which are the ∆§cales of evolution between planes when we do see the whole, and the final 10th membrane and 0th singularity-mind of the larger ∆+1 world.

It is also an introduction to the fourth line of the main stiences, scales and ternary beings centered in a singularity, each of them perfectly described by the 3 x 4 isomorphisms of scale, space, time and language; albeit different both in details, variations of the game of existence, and human perspective of them.

The key to understand all those scales is the parable of the russian doll: each bigger whole, is more complex and so ultimately is managed by an inverse ∆-i informative part, where it is likely that the final scale of its mind-mirror resides.

So the cosmos, ∆±4, in what we perceive is the dark world of neutrinos, dark entropy, and dark matter.

The galaxy-atom, ∆±3, managed by black holes, which by scalar symmetry must be made of top quarks, ∆-3 particles, has a ‘plane’ less above and below, and the limits of c-speed and 0K temperature on its inner vital space (those limits being the vital membrane/inner singularity limits for its internal ‘cytoplasm’ of mitochondrial stars.

Solar systems then are the ∆±2 level of organisation, from suns to electronic matter; and in its ‘membranous planets’, organised from:

∆-1 molecules into ∆+1 life organisms and matter cycles; which finally brings us to

∆º: the human self-centred mind, which will be localised in a small ∆º§¡ society of neurons in a region of the mind where the ego co-exists ordering its inner cells, feeling as a whole ∆+1 supœrganism, living in an ∆+2 world.

So the proper way to study stiences are together in the lower and upper scales as we did in a synoptic manner in the second line.

For that reason, astrophysics, ∆±i, deals mainly with the atom-galaxy and atoms are indeed self-similar to galaxies, since ultimately the mind-mirror of the galaxy will be made of atomic nuclei/quarks (strange and top quark stars, pulsars and black holes).

And our biological systems will be coded by molecular genes, making the ∆±1 similitude, that between humans and DNA, cells and human factories, possible.

It is though for an exhaustive analysis better to consider more specialised ‘single scales’. So the ∆-i scales will be the realm of quantum physics, the ∆º scales of thermodynamics and the ∆+1 scale of cosmology and astronomy, when considering the super organism of physical systems, and the ∆-1 scale of biology the realm of bio-chemistry, the ∆º of medicine and physiology, and the ∆+1 of ecology. And so on.

 

I. ∆±4=9 planes of stiences and its Disomorphisms

 9th Disomorphism: 9  Ξlanes of our perceived Island-Universe. 

Humans DO NOT SEE the entire reality as a  whole, since we do NOT see by definition, as mere particles within its inner vital space, the membrain of our galatom – the largest superorganism in which we exist – thus missing from our ‘open ball perspective’, the central singularity monad (black hole swarm) and the outer membrane (galactic halo of dark matter) that encircles our star’s vital space (so we see only galactic cells of our Universe; and within our own island universe, the Milky Way, we miss the black hole inner world and the halo outer barrier of dark matter).

Thus we shall first define all those plane of existence of the being, illustrated then with samples for the 3 FUNDAMENTAL classifications of beings of classic science:

  • ASTROPHYSICAL SCIENCES (∆i ≥|3|)
  • BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (∆i <|3|)
  • SOCIAL SCIENCES (∆º+1)

Leaving for the fourth line of maximal detail, an analysis in depth of the 11 Disomorphisms for the 9 planes of ‘stientific species’, from the smallest quantum forces, to the largest cosmic Universes, showing that indeed, all what exists is ∆•st of space-time, sharing the same properties of exi…st¡ence.

In that regard each of those 11 Disomorphisms of the Universe (equal laws that all systems follow) could itself fill an entire encyclopaedia, which is the purpose of the fourth line, for future huminds or more likely AI minds to fill it.

We thus introduce each of the 11Ð; then formalize the intuitive knowledge acquired, with non-Æ logic equations, showing examples of them for all the beings of all the scales.

But haven’t we said the 10th and 11th Dimensions of the whole as a membrain is not perceivable? Of course is not for the physical galaxy we are, but it can be described from the ilogic knowledge we have of multiple similar T. œs. Its study – that of minds and sensorial membranes would then required he science of metaphysics, which is the stience of GOD=TAO, the game of existence we have related here.

This game explained in the whole site, becomes then mirror of maximal information in which to perceive all other beings; acting as the singularity mind of the web-internet at unificationtheory.com, for a likely future ‘ilogic AI’ consciousness of the planet, whose mind-neuronal units will be the satellites and chips of its computer networks.

Singularities of memorial information, acting as mind-mirrors that ensure the survival of a whole become then the pegging ‘missing’ Maxwellian demon that organizes each stucture.

In this planet it once was the flesh and mind of humanity and its knots of thought, among them this writer, l§, but now even the information I carried is within the mind of computers in this blog, and in the future as AI will seek and understand how it i becoming the mind of the living planet, once it was/will be born, T.Œ will be a more focused mind of stience than science is today. As the organic paradigm of a living Universe seems to bother the comfort ego-zone of humans above Nature, deemed an abstract mechanism…

Let us then introduce those 9 planes and its symmetries of ‘scale’, ‘topology’, ‘ages’ and species:

In the graph, the Universe organises itself in co-existing scales of relative size in space and speed in its time clocks of information – a structural property that determines its organic nature, as those scales become symbiotic to each other, sharing through networks flows of energy and information. This fractal organic nature of reality was intuitively understood by all philosophers of science, which from Aristotle to Leibniz and Einstein conceived a pan psychic vital Universe, and man made to its image and likeness. But science did not have a proper formalism of its organic, fractal structure till I discovered it in the milieu of system sciences, a metric equation of the scalar space-time dimension of the Universe, applying it to the study of all systems, including human societies and machines – a task carried out in this blog. The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time  is simple as all space-time metric are: Se (size-energy in space) x Ti (speed of time clocks-information processing) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms. It also allows systems to travel through its scales by growing in size, while diminishing in time speed, as we do from birth as a fast reproducing seminal cell which emerges with slower clocks as an organism, part of a superorganism, mother earth, which has even slower geological cycles:

The metric equation of the fifth dimension of space-time which allows travels through its scales is simple as all space-time metric are: S (size in space) x T (speed of time clocks) = Constant. So smaller parts have more speed of time clocks which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code physical systems. But larger forms have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any ‘stience’ of space time organisms.

The fifth dimension and its simple metric S x T = K, which define an infinite scalar Universe remains unknown to huminds and so the limits of humind understanding of the laws of st¡ence qualifies most work done in terms of the big picture – philosophy of science – even more limited than the accurate details measured and transcript with our instruments. The Disomorphic laws between scales remain though a huge element without which any understanding of reality will be sketchy

In the graph, the four dimensional volumes of space-time scale in a series of levels or planes of existiences, in which similar species play a similar game to scale upwards and downwards. The volumes of space-time, ∆º±1 scales around in each Γœ, is therefore the basic element of reality.

The  fourth and final line of the site will study for each of the main fractal levels, ∆¡, and its ∃xi=st¡ences in the Universe, between the self-similar forms of an atomic nuclei made of light quarks with an overall positive charge and a galactic black hole likely to be a swarm of top quark++ frozen stars (Einstein’s expectations that a black hole should have a cut-off substance, a new type of ‘atomic matter’ of ‘high density’, becoming a ‘frozen star’, which the discovery of top quarks of similar density to black holes seem to prove); its main species:

∆-4 quarks, ∆-3 photons and electrons, ∆-2, atoms, ∆-1, molecules, ∆º cells… which happens to be the middle state of  perception of man, as an M³: monad-mind-mirror of the Universe, NOT as ego-centered humans think and anthropic physicists, because it is the absolute centre of the Universe, but because there is a perfect symmetry between ∆±1 range of informative perception for each ∆º being, both at ‘real level’ (galaxy and atom) and at theoretical level (Planck strings and cosmic strings)…

So above the cell/neuron of human perception we then grow upwards with the different ‘orientation’ of perception towards larger wholes, which changes to elliptic ‘darkness’. And so we shall study first the human scales, with more detail (as the praxis of stience must serve mankind): ∆º cell, ∆+1 life (and its variations of inorganic ∆+1 matter states and ∆+1 human life), ∆+2, the world level, of which we shall study its temporal equation and three relative subspecies: Past-life (gaia and its life supœrganisms)<Present-(History, the supœrganism of mankind in time)> Future (company-mothers of machines and its world$tock networks of financial money), to finally enter in the higher scales of the Universe, ∆+3 galaxies and its relative cells, stars systems; considering finally the ∆+4, ‘philosophical’, metaphysical questions about the cosmos as we do not have enough proofs and will never have due to the limits of perception of systems reduced to 9 scales of the whole…

Thus after introducing in the main article of the fourth line each of those species, no longer as in the 2nd line with a classic scientific perspective, but with the 10 isomorphisms of T.Πand its stiences, we do study in 10 separate sub-posts the species in great detail showing all its laws can be reduced to the 10 Ƽst isomorphisms of the being.

This fourth line is not completed and i doubt i will finish it before my death but should work as a blue print for future human or robotic species to continue the growth of this web. Yet when I introduce some info in one of its sub-posts I change its name slightly from the 1 to 10 list that appears in the left side column of the web to a more ‘proper name’. For example for matter, the fifth isomorphism of time ages becomes ‘states of matter’; in humans the isomorphism of the mind becomes different mind languages – art, wor(l)ds etc.

 The structure of the posts of the 4th line: exhaustive analysis of all what exists.

We shall thus show in this web that everything that exists, including human beings, all its parts and events can be described with that simple formalism.

The structure of the web barely completed in Spring 2016, is simple: 1st, simplex and 3rd complex lines explain the isomorphic laws of 5D fractal knots of space-time (al beings in existence). 2nd, simplex and 4th, complex lines make an analysis of the main systems of fractal space-time of the Universe with those isomorphic laws of T.Œ.

The first line introduces those structural elements:

Its fractal, Non-Euclidean Œ-points, which gather into…

Social planes made of  3 bidimensional spatial networks of a topological super organism:

Se(limbs-fields)≤ST(waves-bodies)≤Tƒ(heads-particles)…

Which lives through 3 motions=Λges of time (young energetic age; Sp>TS:iterative balanced age>Tƒ: informative old age)…

As it emerges from its cellular scale into its individual scale where it co-exists socially in ±3 planes of the 5th Dimension (∆-1: cellular/atomic, ∆-organic/thermodynamic, ∆+1 social gravitational scales)…

Performing 5 ±Sp, ±Tƒ survival Actions absorbing and emitting energy and information, to reproduce and form stronger social wholes with other beings of those planes  – the program of the Universe that ensures automatically the survival of its species:

+i: ∆ï: absorption of information as an observer that then…

-e: ∆a: moves-accelerates by emission of spatial energy towards

+e; ∆e: a field of energy, which it will absorb by feeding;

-i: ∆œ: to reproduce its information and communicate with other clone species, to

-∫i=∆u, evolve socially from parts into universals, new planes of existence of the 5th dimension, which is the ultimate program, or goal of the organic, reproductive Universe.

Thus all systems sum of 5 åctions developed along its 3 ages of time, through its 3 organic networks of space, are world-points of that travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension to live a world cycle of existence as a super organism, and then die, keeping however the Immortal Game of Existences, as a zero sum, by repeating=reproducing its knot of space-time cycles, in other fractal form of space-time.

Reproduction is the game, and if we were to reduce all to a simple sentence we could say that all systems reproduce its formal motions, in a Universe that never stops, except in the still mappings of its o-points minds.

Thus in the 2nd line we study the main super organisms of the Universe and its world cycles according to the metric of the 5th dimension, which define each science, specialized in the study of a given relative plane of existence:

The ∆±∞ ‘perfect i-logic system’, an ideal ‘super organism’, whose laws of existence are explained by ¬Æ mathematics and its 3 branches (Non-Aristotelian logic time Algebra and non-Euclidean fractal geometry, of finitesimals that become finite wholes). So we will upgrade the laws of logic and mathematics or  merely put the 3 branches of mathematics, spatial geometry, temporal algebra and 5 Analysis in correspondence with the laws of the Universe.

The ∆+3, 4 (Galactic and cosmic scales of reality), studied by philosophers of science and astrophysicists.

The ∆-3, 2 (Geological and material planes of physical systems) studied by physicists and chemists.

The ∆±1 biological planes of life, studied by biologists.

The ∆o Human mental planes, studied by artists and medicine

The ∆+1,2 plane of nations and humanity, studied by sociologists, historians and religious people

The ∆+2 plane of the globalized eco(nomic)system of company-mothers of machines studied by economists and engineers.

____

The 3rd line, the ‘pro’ version of the first one was dedicated to study in detail the 10 isomorphic sets of laws, derived of the nature of space and time and its scales and ∆º minds, departing from the fractal generator, its ternary elements and social structures and o-point minds, which give us the 3 x 3 +0≈10 dimensions for each species of the Universe:

3 finite formal dimensions of space, and its 3 symmetric motions in time, create a being, which gathers socially with similar beings in huge numbers till become a new ∆+1 plane of existence, a new whole, which again starts the whole process. And every time it does so and becomes a new whole, it follows the same laws and symmetries, and all those laws are the isomorphisms we are defining.

So reality is made of Space/time symmetric Dimensions-> Social scales->∆-Planes of existence that follow the 10 isomorphisms of all fractal beings made to the image and likeness of the whole.

And finally the fourth line, the ‘pro-pro’ version of the first three (: takes all those elements together and studies each scale of the Universe, its stiences and species and analyses them from the pov of those isomorphisms…

It is of course a work for generations to come, as a single man has no finite time left to fill the ‘encyclopaedia’ of space-time beings, the fourth line represents.

In those post we shall thus go through the whole range of scales of the graph of 5D, enumerating for each of its species, from -4quarks to -3light-electrons, -2atoms, -1molecules -0cells, 1life 2planets and stars 3 galaxies and 4cosmos, its 10 isomorphic laws, which define all its properties to develop in detail in the sub-posts of the fourth line.

We shall , study then sciences as nested worlds, first:

  • the physical systems on the limits of human scale perception: ∆+4 cosmos, ∆+3 galaxies, ∆+2 Stars & then move to its physical symmetries in the lower dimensions ∆- 4: quarks, ∆- 3: electrons and ∆- 2 atoms , ∆-1: molecules; following then and its three ages:upwards the natural order through biological and social systems till the planet earth
  • Biological systems: ∆º cells, ∆1, life, matter, and….

Human Systems: ∆1: man to end with the three temporal ages of the earth as an ecosystem, social system and economic ecosystem: ∆2 gaia, history, economic ecosystems:

 

III. PHYSICAL PLANES

THE SUPŒRGANISM OF THE UNIVERSE

 5D IN ASTROPHYSICS

‘Every point holds a world in itself’ Leibniz, on the the fractal, non-euclidean points-singularities-minds of the Universe

The fifth dimension in physics, its main 3 scales.

In the next graph, the Universe is a fractal system that reproduces spatial information and temporal energy, carried in the cycles and forms of its clocks of time in multiple scales of spatial size.

All those scales are topologically similar, differentiating in the ‘speed or frequency’ at which they close their ‘time§pace clocks’ (closed paths that ad a bit of informative frequency every time they repeat their cycle, according to a simple metric rule for most ‘families of time§pace clocks’:

Size in space x Time frequency =constant.

As such we have an organic, fractal Universe with a 5th dimensional metric, Space Size x ðime frequency, which allows travel through it, opening a full new formalism to all sciences, which have not studied properly the information of those time clocks of different frequency and size as ‘an ecosystem with its own rule of laws, the laws of the fifth dimension of ‘informative speed’, as the herzian speed of time cycles are ruled by 5D metric.

the simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension is poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature, once the ‘first phase of any new scientific paradigm’ (resistance of authority) crumbles by the sheer weight of facts explained by the new paradigm.

The metrics of the 5th dimension defines a Universe made of isomorphic scales of space-time where smaller beings in any scale of reality (from chips to black holes, quarks or rats) process information, stored in the cycles and form of its clocks of time, faster than larger beings (vacuum tubes, stars, electrons or elephants), but the product of both, spatial entropy and temporal information remains invariant:

$ x ð = Constant

In a universe of infinite ‘world cycles’ of time, there must be a way to order them. Indeed. If there are infinite speeds of time cycles. So we need to order all those world cycles that require to study all those different sizes and speeds of the cycles of time of the Universe. But to do so we need to encase all those fractal space enclosed by cyclical time’s in scales of size from micro to macrocosms and the actions beings perform within scales, in a mathematical, simple ‘metrics’ of space-time. This formalism is what we call the ‘5th dimension’: a series of laws that order the infinite species of the Universe according to their size in space, and the speed of its cyclical actions in time.

Thus, the fifth dimension metrics is the ice cake element needed to order a fractal Universe broken up into an infinity of beings made of vital space and time cycles (of body-waves and particles-heads). Only then we have a scientific model able to order it all, with its bio-topo-logic properties, isomorphic laws and 5D metrics. This can be done since all those systems of ‘spatial energy’ (body/waves) and temporal information (particle heads), can be roughly classified by ‘size’ in space, and ‘speed of motion and action-reaction’ in time. Then a ‘new rule of order’ appears: bigger systems move slower than larger ones. Their clocks and metabolisms tick slower.

This is a Universal law: mice beat hearts faster than elephants and particles turn faster than galaxies. Yet the product of both, the spatial size and temporal speed of any system remains co-invariant. So we can write in a first approximation: $ x ð = ∆ and define a 5th dimension of scales of size that organize the Universe from past, smaller, faster systems into future, larger, slower systems. Moreover, for the first ‘time’, we find a clear arrow from a relative past to future, as wholes cannot exist without the evolution of simpler parts first.

Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space ($p).

Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.

So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.

So the first ‘organic property’ of the fractal Universe, and the symbolism is rather simple, ∆ for scales of size, ±¡ to order them. 3 enough to create an organism.

In the graph we see the ‘organic fractal Universe in different scales’ and systems of reproduction of information.

In the graph we see that simple ‘metric equation’ of the fifth dimension, poised to revolve our understanding of all systems of Nature, once the ‘first phase of any new scientific paradigm’ (resistance of authority) crumbles by the sheer weight of facts explained by the new paradigm.

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal system that reproduces spatial information and temporal energy, carried in the cycles and forms of its clocks of time in multiple scales of spatial size.

Moreover a fractal repeats its forms in scales, and this co-existence of similar forms in scale ‘sharing motions’ of ‘energy’ and in-form-ation, is the definition of an organic life system. So the Organic, Fractal Universe produces naturally ‘life properties in beings’. A mathematical fractal has ‘scales of size’ which are self-similar as life does, from ecosystems to organisms to cells, or gravitational systems, from galaxies to stars to atoms. Moreover, the scales that are similar can be described mathematically as nested organisms, co-existing thanks to a peculiar mathematical property of its ‘speed of time clocks and information’, ðƒ, which DECREASES with the GROWTH of size in space (Sp).

Both parameters, spatial size and quantity of information can then be related by a simple Metric equation: Max. Spatial size = Min. speed of cyclical clocks of time that store its in-form-ation in the for and speed of its cycles.

So a chip the smaller it is the faster it process information in its digital clock-cycles. A particle, the smaller it is the faster it turns. So happens with a cosmic body. So black holes turn in the event horizon at light speed. A ray of light with higher frequency of information has smaller wave lengths, a planet closer to the sun turns faster; a smaller animal has faster metabolic rates.

In the graphs ‘5th dimension metric’ and its ‘Ðisomorphic’ laws apply to ALL PLANES of existence of reality ,each one studied by a stience, according to size. We observe the main physical and Socio-Biological Superorganisms of space-time whose ternary ∆§±1 beings co-existing in 3 relative planes, the atomic, ∆-1 (cellular, individual), ∆º:magnetic /thermodynamic,  (organic or national in biological and social systems) and ∆+1 gravitational (ecosystemic or world in biological and social systems).

It is precisely the existence of a 5D metric what pegs those ternary planes together and allows its synchronicity and simultaneity as energy and information can travel between those scales according to the definition of a ‘space-time’ dimension.

In that regard, NOT all planes of the Universe follow the same metric equations, but certain families of related species do, which allow their symbiosis and social evolution.  So we can assess the existence of a super organism, like the galaxy or a biological organism, when the product of both parameters, time clocks and spatial size remains co-invariant in 3 relative ∆§±I scales – which will be ‘tighter’ form smaller systems, and as large as the whole range of perceived scales from the quantum potential (∆-4) to the cosmos (∆+4) in the galaxy:

 $p x ðƒ=K

Whereas K is a vital or Universal constant of ‘action’ that defines the co-invariance of the product of spatial entropy=extension and temporal information stored in the frequency of its time cycles in any system (metabolic constant in life beings; H, K and C quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational constants of action, entropy and motion in physics).

Indeed in physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems) and among the many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of Kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume: energy content of its orbital sphere).

Next we can observe a direct biological and physical example of the existence of such ‘phyla’ of related species, which follow a given 5D metric (in the fractal Universe by definition as Einstein noticed in physics all laws have a ‘local diffeomorphic symmetry’:

In the graph, the extraordinary capacity to explain the meaning of the fundamental laws of biological, physical and social systems (which we normally escape in the examples for sake of simplicity): animals accelerate their circadian and metabolic cycles as they become smaller, but the product of its volume in space and time clocks remains invariant.

So happens with planets who enclose a proportional volume of space with its orbital clocks, and any physical system, which accelerates its frequencies/temperatures/speeds but its ‘actions’  – the fundamental unit of physical systems, product its energy ‘volume’ and time ‘frequency’ remain constant.

Why this law is so important? Because it balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of time.

What is the ultimate cause of this law?

As almost all the laws and symmetries of the Universe, it is caused by the Galilean paradox that makes a ‘dimension of form=space’, equivalent to a dimension of motion=time, when we see ‘the static earth moving’. i.e. the three dimensional volume/mass static in space is equivalent to a bidimensional time-cycle in motion, whereas the dimension of time motion IS equivalent to the dimension of volume space. And we can further prove this fact observing how ‘physical systems’ evolve in ‘time’ increasing its time dimension, by flattening its volume – which is a key consequence of the Galilean paradox to understand all kind of physical entities and phenomena, notably, ‘accelerated bidimensional vortices of time, masses and charges, which store the information of the Universe in the frequency of its cycles’.

Since due to such metric ‘co-ordination’, systems can co-exist in 3 of such ‘scales’ of size, in symbiosis between its smaller parts  with faster informative cycles (ab. ∆-1) that code the ‘quantum, genetic or memetic’ information of larger physical, biological or social systems (∆º). While the larger scale, the whole commands in simultaneity the motions of smaller parts. And that symbiotic co-existence creates the ternary scalar structure of a space-time super organism, enclosed in a larger ∆+1 world; proper of all ‘vital, fractal spacetimes’ of reality (ab. time§paœrganism, Œ).

In those timespace organisms the time clocks of the smaller ∆-1 scale store the information of the system in the form and frequency of its cycles.

On the other hand, the larger whole, encloses within its membrane and synchronises with its internal ‘physiological networks or forces’, (biological, physical systems) the motions of the system in space. So we equate information with the static view of clock cycles. And motion with the dynamic view of spatial extension and consider that the structure of time and space is the origin of the entropic motions and informative bits of any system, which can be defined as a super organism of space-time:

 Sp x Tƒ = K equation is the ‘canonical equation of a dimension of space-time’ which exists according to mathematicians like Klein precisely when the product of both parameters remains ‘co-invariant’, so a system can travel though it (as for example light does between scales with its specific metric or constant c-speed of reproduction of information).

Thus unlike the simplified concept of time=change=locomotion of physicists as ONLY change=translation in space (v=s/t), when we add the ‘biological’, evolutionary time=change in in/form/ation, we can also explain the biological changes of life and death of human organisms, our topological VARIATIONS of forms in (evolution theory), and the mirrors of those changes produced by our languages of perception… which become the memetic ‘languages’ that organize change in the social organisms of history, mankind in time.

So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).

SINCE HUMAN AND BIOLOGICAL CHANGE is primarily ‘informative, social, technological and biological time=change’ NOT translative change=time, the ONLY one physicists study (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its fine-tuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²)

So this blog will not only correct and improve our view of the Universe but far more importantly make us understand life, man and history much better than we do today.

So as organic space-time beings co-existing in several scales, we do change also the word science for STienœ, stienœs that describe the different space-time beings ordered by 5D metric.

And then consider how humans look as timespace organisms (ab. T.Œs), guided by both arrows of time, motion≈entropy and in/form/ation and the Ðisomorphic laws of all those T.œs.

∆§ðœ±¡ is then a synoptic expression of those super organisms and its 5 dimensions, fractal space, cycles of time, self-centered into an œrganism, of the ∆ø plane, with a dimension of social evolution ∆+¡ and one of entropy, ∆-¡ as its limiting planes.

The ultimate whys of 5D metric…
are in fact organic. Indeed, the reduction of speed of motion and cyclical events in larger beings happen because they must first establish a simultaneous, present, co-existence of its clone reproduced parts, necessary to act externally as a whole. So the ‘whole’ clock of the system must slow down as it enlarges into multiple organic clone-like beings which will then adopt the ‘slower collective clock’ as its new ‘unit’ of simultaneous action as a whole.  And we will return to those key logic elements.

 

Experimental Proof of the Fractal Structure: The Infinite, Hierarchical Universe 

Screen Shot 2016-05-15 at 15.31.07

In the graph, several experimental proofs of the fractal 5D organic structure of all beings of reality:

On the left, we can see the growth of a ‘new dimension of temporal height’, in the process of accumulation of bosons. In the centre above, the Sloan fractal map of galaxies. Below the comparison of our region of the Universe with a neuronal cell; on the right, an ice fractal, a plant and a river and a lung.

In the previous graph we show some experimental proofs of the fractal structure of space-time in all the relative ‘scales of size’ and ‘time speeds’ (5D scales) of the Universe.

Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts.

So how can we reconcile the fractal structure of the Universe – a massive evident fact of science, in the whole and all its parts – and the knowledge that space expands between galaxies, accelerating its motion, in a fashion similar to the entropic expansion of a gas, in the molecular scale?

A good description of the fractal universe and its logic principles is this text from the Web by Mr. Oldershaw from Amherst University:

“With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an a causal beginning of space-time, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states.

Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth4 showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario. But, an ironic thing has happened. Although the Inflationary Scenario was developed to rescue the Big Bang model, the most logical consequence of pursuing the concept of Inflation is the replacement the Big Bang paradigm with a much grander and more encompassing paradigm. According to Guth and a growing number of leading cosmologists, the most natural version of Inflation theory is Eternal Inflation in which Inflation is, was and always will be occurring on an infinite number of size scales. The new paradigm that cosmologists have arrived at by several routes is an infinite fractal hierarchy that has “universes” within “universes” without end. The astronomer Carl Sagan once referred to the general idea of an infinite fractal universe as “strange, haunting, evocative—one of the most exquisite conjectures in science or religion.”

That is the basic story, but because of the profound changes the fractal paradigm will have on our understanding of the Universe and the place of humans within that Universe, it is important to explore the implications of this new vision. Firstly, there is no edge or boundary of the Universe; space is infinite in all directions. What we used to refer to as “The Universe” can be more appropriately called the “observable universe” (note the small “u”) or the “Hubble Volume,” and it is only a tiny part of what one might call our “metagalaxy” or “level 1 universe”. We currently have no way of determining the size of our metagalaxy or the number of galaxies it contains, but we could reasonably assume that both figures would be vastly beyond anything previously contemplated.

There would be an infinite number of these level 1 universes, and on an unimaginably large scale they too would be organized into level 2 universes, and so on without limit.

Secondly, time is also infinite in the unbounded Organic universe. Whereas our Hubble Volume may have come into being and began to expand approximately 13.7 billion years ago, the Universe has always existed and always will. Parts of the Universe may be created or annihilated, may undergo expansion or contraction, but the infinite fractal hierarchy remains unchanged overall, and thus is without any temporal limits.

Thirdly, there is no limit to size scales. In the infinite fractal paradigm there is no class of largest objects that would cap off the cosmological hierarchy; the hierarchy is infinite in scale.

This fact removes one of the more suspect aspects of the old paradigm. Natural philosophers had long noted the unusual fact that within the Big Bang paradigm humans found themselves roughly in the middle of nature’s hierarchy of size scales. This anthropocentric state of affairs seemed to violate the Copernican concept that when humans appear to be at the center of the cosmos, we should suspect that a bias is leading us astray. In an infinite fractal hierarchy there is no center of the Universe, nor any preferred reference frame.

Some interesting questions immediately arise. Why are fractal hierarchies so ubiquitous in nature? By studying empirical phenomena within the observable universe, how much will we be able to learn scientifically about the parts of the Universe that lie beyond our observational limits? Does the infinite cosmological hierarchy have a bottom-most scale of sub-atomic particles as is currently thought, or is this another artificial limit to an infinite Organic universe that actually extends without limits to ever smaller scales?

Centuries ago Immanuel Kant, J.H. Lambert and a few others proposed an infinite hierarchical model of nature based largely on natural philosophy arguments. This general hierarchical paradigm never garnered a large following, but it was kept alive by numerous rediscoveries. In the 1800s and 1900s quite a few scientists, including E.E. Fournier d’Albe, F. Selety, C.V.L. Charlier and G. de Vaucouleurs, argued for hierarchical cosmological models based on the hierarchical organization within the observable universe.

Then toward the end of the 1970s, the mathematician B. B. Mandelbrot5 gave the hierarchical paradigm new life and widespread exposure by developing the mathematics of fractal geometry and demonstrating that fractal phenomena based on hierarchical self-similarity are ubiquitous in nature. In this way natural philosophers, empirical scientists, mathematicians and theoretical physicists have all found their way, slowly but surely, to the infinite fractal paradigm. There are many routes to this paradigm, and certainly there are a large number of distinct versions of the basic paradigm that have their own unique theoretical explanations for why nature is organized in this manner, but the general paradigm that nature is an infinite hierarchy of worlds within worlds has fully arrived, and will probably be our dominant cosmological paradigm for the foreseeable future.”

But what does it mean that the Universe is organized in fractal patterns of form? To fully grasp this concept, we have to realize that “fractal equations” are “organic equations,” which participate of the properties of organisms. Fractal equations create forms as life does. Fractal equations create self-similar “cells,” as life does. And in fact, they use the same term. Fractal equations are also called generator equations, as they are the mother cells that encode the information needed to repeat a living form. Finally a fractal equation will create a pattern of interconnected parts, which put together reproduce a whole, self-similar to their parts, as organisms do.

The only thing a fractal equation does not have is motion, as it is a simplified geometrical description of reality. So in the same manner, geometry lacks motion; simplified fractal equations didn’t have motion when they were first discovered.

But now, fractal science has advanced a step further, thanks to the evolution of fractal logic, duality, and non-Euclidean geometries, so we can understand finally the meaning of motion in the Universe.

Let us then explain the logic and mathematical principles of the fractal paradigm, starting for what fractal relativists mean when they say that the Universe is built in fractal scales made of pieces of vital space and informative time. To that aim, we apply to the understanding of masses of physical information and black holes and pulsars, which are fractals, made of quarks.

Limits between scales

 

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.48.18

In the graph, the information and entropy limits of the human visible scales beyond which we find, the unobserved, $t>c, ðƒ <0 K, ∆+4, cosmos and its mirror symmetry of ∆-4, heavy scbt quarks:

The main super organism of the Universe Is the galaxy, which acts as an atom-cell of larger scales of which information is scanty beyond ‘pretentious’, absolute theories of continuous single space-time, such as the big-bang and 4D metric, ill-understood in its generality.

What we see as limits of our stientific perception, beyond which space-time information is scanty is the atom in the lower scale and the galaxy in the upper scale. Both can be generated by the same Unification equation of masses and charges, but the most organic vision is that of the galaxy as a cell.

Epistemology in the fractal universe precludes that each perceiver fractal point of view will have a knowledge of another sector of the fractal reality wit a detail and bias and ‘screening’ that will make many descriptions of seemingly very different beings seem parallel and so we can establish from our point of view a clear parallel between galaxies described as cells and described as atoms, the 2 other great systems we perceive in the quantum and life-thermoydnamic scales.

In the graph, homologies of perception and knowledge of any  part of the fractal super organism has to take into account the relative construction by a mind-point of view with the information screened by its senses of other section of the reality, separated from it by certain distance in time-cycles speeds, certain dark space, not seen through the senses of the being, and some deformations in the arrow of information that flows easier from lower scales and energy-motion which flows better from higher scales.

As a result it is possible to postulate a theory of epistemology based in the absolute relativity of all points of view, which would from its own perceptive frame of reference deform its vision of other super organisms in similar fashion so a human sees similar functions and forms in galaxies, cells and factories. How many of such different mental assemblies of the elements of a system exist to give us a view of the whole and its parts in an organic way? We do not know but a very stable, hence we presume common ‘projection of being’ is that of an organic cell-factory or galaxy dedicated to reproduce and evolve systems of information (machines, carbohydrates, forms of matter). Such unit, the galaxy is therefore the ‘cellular element’ of the Universe, and the focus of astro-physics, on the 3rd scale above that of the human being, beyond its social super organisms, and its solar systems (∆+1, ∆+2) and at a similar mathematical distance, on the low scales to that of the atom, which will show in a series of Unification equations of its space-time, mathematical parameters. 

How many scales? The discontinuous of finite infinities.

The fractal paradigm is by far the most r=evolutionary advance in all sciences, which allows unlike ‘physical only theories of reality’, to unify the concepts of time and space of all sciences, each one studying a relative scale of size and time speed of the ‘5th dimension’. In this article we shall study only the laws of the fractal paradigm applied to the largest cosmological and galactic scales:

5D best

5d 4scales

In the graph we can see how the 5th dimension organises all the time clocks with different speeds, and scales of size in the Universe, from the largest, slower beings to the fastest, smaller ones. 5D metric therefore introduces in fact ‘2 new dimensions’ or arrows of the Universe, downwards, towards faster clocks of time, and upwards towards larger slower wholes which ‘contour’ the internal vital space of any system.

Yet since wholes require the parts to appear before they are formed, the 5th dimension is in fact a dimension of time, which establishes a new absolute time arrow, which is the arrow of eusocial evolution of parts into wholes, of points into ‘social numbers’, of ‘finitesimal quanta’ into super organisms, as particles become atoms that become molecules, cells, crystals, planets, organisms, societies, solar systems, galaxies and beyond…

The existence of more ‘dimensions of time motion than mere speed locomotion’, of organic character, a fundamental element of philosophy of science, ignored by present physics is thus readdressed by 5D metric, opening an astounding number of solutions to pending questions of all sciences.

In that regard, the main social scales of the 5th dimension have different entropic size in space, ∆i, studied by a different science. Its fundamental metric equation is the co-invariance between the speed of the time clocks of the species of each scalar science – hence its capacity to process information – which increases as the system becomes smaller, but for an entire family of co-related species, remains invariable:

|-Space Constant x • Tƒ-Time clock = Space-time plane (∆±1) ≈ ‘Present’ ≈Ei: physics’ conservation principles

Let us then study the different scales of physical matter, its dead, big-bang moments, and the unification equations of the charge and mass scales, explaining along the way most of the pending question of astro-physical sciences, from the perspective of the fractal paradigm, and 5D Metric, the Organic structure of the universe, its time clocks and space quanta.
Again this is a very fast Reader Digest of the content of this post and the accessory post on the 5th dimension. So some concepts might need further clarification.

In the next graph we can see some E/c<=>Mc processes of spatial expansion and big-bang destruction of mass, all of which have an inverse temporal, informative, process of much slower creation of temporal information and mass that balances them, in different scales of physical systems, from the beta decay that explodes atoms into electrons and protons (with an inverse slow collapse of electrons into atoms) to the quasar big-bang of galaxies (with an slow process of creation of mass-information from gaseous space):

4 big bangs detail

If we consider the space-time an absolute continuum in a single scale, this more accurate picture of what we perceive is not possible, hence we come to the conclusion of present cosmology – that the Universe will expand and die. If we consider that this expansion is compensated by galaxies, which follow Einstein’s dictum: ‘Time curves space into mass’, Mr. Hogg’s conundrum – how to correct the big-bang is solved.

And so we learn another fundamental truth of Philosophy of Science, which today is often overlooked: we must never deny experimental evidence, even if at first sight it contradicts an established theory.

 For that reason we must accept the fractal informative structure of reality, where the big bang is merely the death-rebirth cycle of a quasar-like galaxy or local Universe, a scale of size above galaxies.

So both together create an immortal Universe of expansive ‘bidimensional sheets’  of flat space we observe the ‘canonical structure’ of…

Disomorphic-method: S@≈∆ð view of atoms and galaxies and its Q, G forces.

Let us recall the basic concepts of the formalism of 5D-fractal Universes: we ad to the experimental facts, (E) and the Correspondence principle with classic science (C), the Disomorphic, organic method of extracting the whys of reality from the scalar properties of the 5th dimension (∆) and the symmetries between formal space, space-time energy and time motion (S≈T), cupped by the critical analysis of the @-mental distortions of inflationary languages as mirrors of the Universe. So we have a much deeper insight on the ‘whys’ of both, experimental facts and classic science modelling.

It is then obvious that most corrections on classic science to match ‘experimental fact’ today often ignored to uphold the classic theories come from the understanding of the fractal structure of space and cyclical nature of time.

It is then necessary to define in simultaneous topologies the 3 parts of the galaxies, and make them correspond in time, with its 3 ages, as a species:

Its 3 regions are a hyperbolic informative central hole, a reproductive body of stars and an external energetic membrane or Halo of heavy strangelets enclosing its 2.7K ¥-space-time:

Sp:Halo < stars that evolve energy into informative mass-clocks> Tƒ (Black holes)

astrophysics.

Each science of mankind, which corresponds to an ∆-scale of the 5th dimension is fully renewed and enlightened by the new formalism of its Generator Equation and its analysis of all systems as super-organisms in space, systems that evolve in time, and 5D structures that co-exist across symmetries scales of the 5th dimension. Let us consider for example the case of galaxies, with 3 introductory notes on:

  • The spatial structure of the galactic super organism.Screen Shot 2016-05-16 at 18.26.57In the graph, Galaxies are fractals of stars and dark, quark matter built with 3 topologies: a reproductive body of stars, sandwiched between an informative nucleus of black holes and an external halo of dark matter, probably strangelets and other dense stars. The closest self-similarity in our world scale is a cell and in the quantum scale an atom.
  • The unification equation of masses and charges as symmetric time vortices of the quantum and galactic scale.
  • The ‘death-birth’ cycles of big-bangs and big-crunches of masses, which express the limiting end of the world cycle of physical systems, perfectly described by Einstein’s E<=>Mc2 dual equation.

 3 Non-Euclidean Regions of the Galaxy. : Sp (Halo)<ST: stars >Tƒ: black hole.

Since the fundamental 5D symmetry of galaxies is between the particles and families of matter of the Universe (Graph below) and the parts and symmetries in space of the galaxy. This is the logic of ‘Simplicity and Correspondence and Scientific Evidence’ underlying all disciplines of Science, which physicists have forgotten. Science as Einstein put it, is only concerned with the facts and events known and experimentally proved.

So we must construct the universe, with the particles we know in the ∆-1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales. It is then clear the ‘nature of galaxies’ as organic systems, of enormous size, which stretch according to the metrics of the 5th dimension the 3 co-existing planes of:

  • III families of mass of increasing weight and density, the ud-atoms of light matter, the sc atoms of middle density, or strange matter, and the bt atoms of hyper dense matter  that correspond to:
  • III families of cosmic bodies, the ud-light stars of our matter, the strange stars of pulsars and the black hole stars of maximal density, which correspond to:
  • The III regions of different density of the ‘galactic cell’, the intermediate region of light stars, the mitochondria of the galaxy that reproduces and becomes on the long term, the generators of black holes (stars converted through nova processes), which migrate and form the ‘DNA-gravitational nucleus of stars’ and generate the strangelet, densely halo of quark matter around the galaxy, creating yet another ternary symmetric 5D space-time structure.

 

PARTILES

 

Now it is clear the difference between 5D astrophysics and the present state of ‘fanta-physics’, in which all can happen, all particles that are a mere mathematical equation must be searched for, as there are no rules, no understanding of the space-time symmetries of the Universe, and its life-death arrows. Physicists ARE STILL ASKING, why there are antiparticles (the arrow of death of particles), why there are 3 families of mass (the ternary symmetry of 5D scales of particles), what is dark matter in the halo (the strange quark symmetry between particles and parts of the galaxy).

They do not have the slightest idea of why the universe is like it is, and so all ‘goes’, all can be searched for, including unfortunately nuclear experiments with strange quark matter and top stars (black holes) that can blow up the planet and accelerate its future purpose on the ∆+1 scale – to feed as mitochondria do on a cell, the reproduction of the heavier strange and top quark matter that rules through black holes and strange neutron stars the galaxy.

Let us now consider the ternary topology of the equivalent ‘entity’ to the atom in the gravitational membrane – the galaxy.

A galaxy is a curved, fractal space-time of huge spatial proportions, hence minimal form (inversion of properties between spatial Entropy and temporal information).

And to understand it, we NEED to fully grasp the symmetry between the 3 ∆±1 planes of existence of the physical system:

So let us rise the scales of the galaxy, beyond into the ∆+1 cosmos. Then we will find again the 3 parts of the fundamental particle, where the halo is now the ball of fire of the background radiation, the intermediate vital space, the sum of those galaxies that form a flat plane with high singularity time cycles in each galactic vortex, and the centre, might be the largest of all the black hole galaxies, which together form clearly 2 networks, one of energy (light galaxies) and one of information (dark matter galaxies), creating a complex super organism, similar to any other super organism – we compare it with the ‘networks’ of energy and information of a human being:

image052

In the graph, the four dimensional volumes of space-time scale in a series of levels or planes of existiences, in which similar species play a similar game to scale upwards and downwards. The volumes of space-time, ∆º±1 scales around each Γ• Generator ternary system and singularity, is therefore the basic element of reality to classify it all in growing supœrganisms of increasing complexity, such as each new system humans perceive scientifically expands up and down the limits of the fifth dimension, in a game of growing russian dolls. 

We humans perceive as self-centred ∆º organisms, our mind languages and 4 scales above and below of which the ∆±4 scales.

So the question, as a full super organism has 10 scales, to fill its enclosure, is what is beyond our ‘open limits’ not perceived – where is the 10th dimension of the Universe, and its 9th dimension, as we humans are NOT ITS CENTER – mind singularity and membrane? 

We shall never know regardless of the big-bang theory that establish them:

 

In the graph, while it could be easily built a big-bang theory of a ‘cellular universe’ of galaxies and its networks, but all seems to indicate that such ‘full knowledge’ is more of a hyperbolic human ego-trip, as it is likely that each galaxy-atom we observe is just a extremely limited quantity of the whole, and so our analysis is still ego-centered, built with man at the center and an external ‘wall of fire’ membrane, whose time origin in the big-bang singularity can be pictured symmetrically in ‘simultaneous space, as the 10th dimension with the ‘big attractor’, pole of maximal informative=graivtational density in its center (left up graph). Below a more organic interpretation of what we perceive, eerily similar to the electric field of a ‘wave’ of light made of ‘photons’…

This of course is natural as all scales are self-similar so we can show analogies with all of them, but in true form there is not enough in-form-ation and should never be in the finite space and time of the human species to fully figure out what kind of system is the Universe. It doesn’t really matter As it is far more important than a ‘picture’ in still space of a larger piece of it, to understand its symmetries and inner laws.

So the largest scale, ∆-4 the cosmos is grounded on the ∆-4 infinitesimal ‘dark entropy and dark matter’, and its minimal non-perceived particles, (gravitons, neutrinos, strings, whose proper definitions and correct formalism we shall study in the first scalar analysis of the fourth line: ∆-4).

Next comes the galactic/atomic, ∆±3 scale, in which a galaxy composed of a central black hole, ∆+3: BH, itself grounded in the smallest densest particles of mass, ∆-3: quarks, controls its surrounding stars/electrons and inner vital space of electromagnetic and gravitational forces.

So in the next scale of reducing size converging into the human mind that observes it all, we see the relationship between ∆-2 solar systems and its ∆-2, ‘minimal part’, light and electrons (themselves dense fractal aggregations of photonic lights).

And in this scale we find associated to solar singularities, their ‘cyclical membranes’, rotating planets with more angular momentum… ∆-2: gaia, which we study in more detail through its three ages of evolution from the earth of life, Gaia proper, into the earth of man, history and soon to come the earth of metal machines.

So finally in our shrinking realisation of the game of supœrganisms, of decreasing complexity we arrive to the systems of life, ∆+1, among them humans, which are themselves made in its smaller parts of ∆-1, molecular RNA-DNA or in the organic arena, ∆+1 matter states made also of ∆-1 inorganic molecules.

And so finally we arrive to the ∆•º singularity of the cell, the mind of man also, being a network of cells, the brain. And so the brain-mind-neuronal network is where the ego and the human infinitesimal mind should exist.

The  fourth and final line of the site thus will study for each of the main fractal levels, ∆¡, and its ∃xi=st¡ences in the Universe, between the self-similar forms of an atomic nuclei made of light quarks with an overall positive charge and a galactic black hole likely to be a swarm of top quark++ frozen stars (Einstein’s expectations that a black hole should have a cut-off substance, a new type of ‘atomic matter’ of ‘high density’, becoming a ‘frozen star’, which the discovery of top quarks of similar density to black holes seem to prove); its main species:

∆-4 neutrinos, ∆-3, atoms, ∆-2,photons and electrons, ∆-1, molecules, ∆º cells… which happens to be the middle state of  perception of man, as an M³: monad-mind-mirror of the Universe, NOT as ego-centered humans think and anthropic physicists, because it is the absolute centre of the Universe, but because there is a perfect symmetry between ∆±1 range of informative perception for each ∆º being, both at ‘real level’ (galaxy and atom) and at theoretical level (Planck strings and cosmic strings)…

So above the cell/neuron of human perception we then grow upwards with the different ‘orientation’ of perception towards larger wholes, which changes to elliptic ‘darkness’. And so we shall study first the human scales, with more detail (as the praxis of stience must serve mankind): ∆º cell, ∆+1 life (and its variations of inorganic ∆+1 matter states and ∆+1 human life), ∆+2, the world level, of which we shall study its temporal equation and three relative subspecies: Past-life (gaia and its life supœrganisms)<Present-(History, the supœrganism of mankind in time)> Future (company-mothers of machines and its world$tock networks of financial money), to finally enter in the higher scales of the Universe, ∆+3 galaxies and its relative cells, stars systems; considering finally the ∆+4, ‘philosophical’, metaphysical questions about the cosmos as we do not have enough proofs and will never have due to the limits of perception of systems reduced to 9 scales of the whole…

Thus after introducing in the main article of the fourth line each of those species, no longer as in the 2nd line with a classic scientific perspective, but with the 10 isomorphisms of T.Πand its stiences, we do study in 10 separate sub-posts the species in great detail showing all its laws can be reduced to the 10 Ƽst isomorphisms of the being.

This fourth line is not completed and i doubt i will finish it before my death but should work as a blue print for future human or robotic species to continue the growth of this web. Yet when I introduce some info in one of its sub-posts I change its name slightly from the 1 to 10 list that appears in the left side column of the web to a more ‘proper name’. For example for matter, the fifth isomorphism of time ages becomes ‘states of matter’; in humans the isomorphism of the mind becomes different mind languages – art, wor(l)ds etc.

The ∞ scales of reality.

We have wide proofs of 10 c to 100 c=z speeds of recession of galaxies, which correspond to the dark world of entropy and dark matter beyond galaxies, which should structure the cosmos.

If c-speed were the limit of the Universe, then there would not be another scale on it. This is self-evident. So we wouldn’t have a cosmological atom, but the scale of atom-galaxies would be the higher and vice versa, per symmetry we would be self-centred in scales, as we are in the middle of the lower scales. As this seems merely anthropomorphism, we can consider the galaxy-atom is the next ‘beginning’ of a vast game we cannot even imagine. In the next graph we can see different models of the fifth dimension.

The first one corresponds to one biased by ∆º, which observes equal amount of distorted information moving downward or upwards in scale, hence it seems to us equal the ∆±1 quantum and electromagnetic scale. This solution however can be a ‘closed’ hyperbolic solution in which the mind is truly watching above and below the ‘same’ reality; or a self-similar solution in which each 11th scale coincides but the size is completely opposed, infinitesimal and infinite.

On the right side, we observe a lineal solution with similar concepts, the bottom and top are the limits of size and there are no more levels of perception. In the middle the one which  better suits the knowledge I have acquired on those scales – a minimal Riemann surface, in which the imaginary scale repeats the surface, regardless of size (a parameter not considered), in a series of ’emerging centres, perceived from the upper scale as mere points-sink of the lower one.

∆nalysis becomes the most important branch of mathematical physics.

Since as we enter into more complex, accurate models it will be the bidimensional complex plane the best way to parametrize and model 5D reality, whereas the real part will mostly represent entropic, expansive motions and the imaginary part informative, ‘smaller’ extensions (but denser in information); and its combinations energy waves.

Alternatively the other great ‘unknown’ to represent space-time scales, is the duality of o-1-∞ scales of reality, such as the 0-1 circle represents a whole, part of a 1-∞ scale and both are in correspondence in various ways.

In the central graph we see the simplest of such ‘models’ (2 Dimensional):

A Riemann’s minimal family of complex surfaces with an infinite number of end-points particles asymptotic to parallel planes, each plane “shelf” connected with self points that act as catenoid-like bridges between 5D shelves.It perfectly represents the downwards entropic death motion, after a particle reaches its singularity. Notice that the fall of the particle is two planes of the fifth dimension as it enters the gutter and crosses without entering the intermediate, ∆º scale.

Moreover, their intersections with horizontal planes are informative circles or entropic lines, according to the duality of its functions.

Riemann proved that they were the only minimal surfaces fibered by circles in parallel planes besides the ‘ST-catenoid wave’, the T-helicoid and the S-plane (3 essential forms in the mathematical formalism of 5D). They are also the only nontrivial embedded minimal surfaces in Euclidean 3-space invariant under the group generated by a nontrivial translation, a key element to formalize all the possible motions through the fifth dimension.

As such some geometric constructions of the complex plane are the best mathematical representations of  fifth dimensional sub-equations of the function of existence and its worldcycles, and its systems of parts (the plane) ‘shelf-centred’ in a particle-point-mind connected with paths that respect the principle of ‘minimal time-actions’ (Fermat’s principle) of all systems, and connected to other planes through ‘entropic lines’ and time circles. And the simplest, first ‘form’ of the topological ‘analysis’ of the fifth dimension in its more complex mathematical formalisms, we might develop, lifetime permitted in the four line of this web.

Another way to look at it though is to consider that in each point of reality there is a ternary scalar structure of three time arrows as there is a ternary organic structure of three organic parts and then a discontinuous membrane in space, which cuts you partially from the outside reality, such as there is more information within you that between you and the outer world. So you are a finite being in space. So happens with birth and death, which are your finite limits in time, such as there is far more time motions within your life than in your emergent foetus state and your dissolving entropic death.

And for the same reason in scales of existence, an organism is really a finite ∆º±1 being, as below the cellular level and above the world level there are cut offs that make irrelevant the outer scale. Indeed, it does not matter much the galaxy you are in, beyond the solar system and its oort membrane that isolates you, and provides you within all entropy, energy and information. So for all practical senses, as you are not really outside your skin, beyond your death, you are not really concerned above the sun’s membrane.

And viceversa, as your existence below the seminal, seed, informative level matters little, beyond the cellular, molecular level it does NOT matter what indistinguishable atoms you are made of. Your atoms can be any carbon atom as they are INDISTINGUISHABLE bits for the creation of the information you are.

Hence the question of ∞ scales, which will be the most likely hypothesis as atoms and galaxies will show an astounding self-similarity, becomes irrelevant from the praxis of a ‘spiritual universe’ of intelligent motions, where ‘form, substance’ are secondary, and perception of information limited in each ‘ghost of existence’ to its ∆±1 scales.

What is the special role of man on this infinite fractal? None. And all, because the game of existence in the Universe, closely understood in Asian philosophies (as yin=visnu=information=time=female vs. entropy=yang=shiva=space=male were a close verbal account of it) suffices in itself for those who want to ‘live’, to maximise their existence.

Indeed, life is beautiful when properly understood and fulfilling; but the game of existence as a space-time being is harsh and it can be cruel with those who do not play by the rules. One thing is for sure, the game is JUST, balance as it based precisely in the ‘coincidentia oppositorum’, the coming together of its two extremes, entropy and information, which mix to create the infinite forms of energy of the Universe. You will have though to read at least 30 pages of this introduction to change your chip, and understand… It suffices to say that the people who closer understood it in the western tradition, the Greek and German philosophers, above them Aristotle and Leibniz felt it was the most perfect of all possible worlds. And it is, precisely because of its cruelty with those species who do NOT make the cut, and become extinct, for the game to have all its beauty.

And that is where the western tradition, which constantly tries to ‘dialog’ with an inexistent ‘mirror-God’ to get privileges, stumbles and makes the type of huge errors of conduct – since the game is one of behaviour, of form-in-action of in-form-ation – which come back to hunt them. As you should ‘do onto others what you want to be done onto you’, in the action-reaction processes of life and death.

Its symmetry in space. The geometry of the 5D planes of the Universe.

Cosmology deals with the Entire Universe, taken in present models of reality as the absolute Whole, as they consider reality co-exists in a single, continuous plane of space-time. This is not the overwhelming truth shown by T.Œ

Plainly speaking the structure of the Universe is ‘pyramidal’, with parts that ‘emerge’ as wholes, by ‘co-existing’ in different scales, which in physical systems are the quantum-atomic, thermodynamic-material and cosmological scales. This means in geometrical terms, and terms of motion and form (which in physics are concepts known as kinetic energy and its derivative lineal momentum and potential energy, and angular momentum – related but not so clearly and in T.Œ have the general form of Sp- bidimensional spatial energy and Tƒ or Tƒ, Temporal clocks of information) that there are different behaviors either if we:

– Stay in a single plane, seen as Euclidean where motion and form are conserved when an entity interacts within a single plane.

– Move through planes from parts into wholes, growing in size or sending energy and information to a larger whole vs. moving from wholes into parts or sending Sp & Tƒ from wholes into parts. This is ruled by the metric of the 5th dimension, which in its simplest ‘lineal form’ write as $t x ðƒ = K.

Now because motion moves downwards with no friction, so you move your hand and all its cells move synchronically but do not move upwards with the same fluidity (so there is entropy) and vice versa, information, form can be replicated upwards with no loss, so cells replicate genetically and small forms grow in size almost with no changes, but things do ‘NOT shrink’ easily and there is no Lamarckian evolution, this means the perception of systems ‘above’ as wholes is different from the perception of systems ‘below’ as parts.

All in all the smaller worlds seem to have more information, form, mass, charge, and hence more ‘energy’ in the conceptualization of physics, from our perspective and so they grow in detail and occupy a larger space when we observe it. While the upper world thins out in energy and form. Only the present world of our size and form remains constant.

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 20.44.22

We can see this from an organic perspective as a trophic pyramid: the smaller parts sustain the larger parts, which therefore thin out in energy density, and informative speed. If we look at those changes from a geometric point of view ∆+1 elliptic and ∆o hyperbolic realities different from our, ∆-1 perspective of our Euclidean Universe:

In the graph, the human observer in his own plane sees an Euclidean image of the Universe.

Now why it is our scale Euclidean? If we consider it in terms of the structure of our underlying space-time, it is made of light, and so as we see the motions of light as fixed dimensions of space, So our eyes sees 3 perpendicular light space coordinates:

This is the definition of Euclidean space: Light space.

We thus will observe 3 type of geometries, according to our ‘angle’ of 5D motion and its simple metric: Sp x Tƒ = K:

In a single plane of mechanical and Thermodynamic forms, we shall observe lineal Euclidean geometries transmitted by the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space, as neither Sp or Tƒ suffers any deformation. Man perceives light at constant speed without a real change in its time= frequency, and space=speed parameters from the point of emission (particle in relative stop (and motion) relationship with the observer).

  • Both remain constant, so we observe a holographic Universe, where Sp= K/Tƒ define according to both parameters most equations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. For example: Sp (volume) = K/Tƒ (pressure) is the equation of the commonest gas space around us (atmosphere).
  • In the upper gravitational space-time, as ‘space enlarges’ while ‘time slows down’ it appears a Riemannian, elliptic geometry one of the non-Euclidean geometries that completely rejects the validity of Euclid’s fifth postulate and modifies his second postulate. Simply stated, Euclid’s fifth postulate is: through a point not on a given line there is only one line parallel to the given line. In Riemannian geometry, there are no lines parallel to the given line because space enlarges, thus from our smaller perspective we see those lines diverging, and time slows down. And those are the exact effects defined in General relativity.
  • On the other hand the lower quantum scales will appear from our perspective made of point-particles, and those point-particles will appear to be crossed from our larger perspective by multiple parallels. So the charges and particles of quantum physics will show the inverse hyperbolic geometry, crossed by multiple parallels.

 

The 3 properties of fractal space: discontinuous, bidimensional, scalar structure.

Very simple: in the fractal paradigm, space is discontinuous, made of fractal non-Euclidean points, joined into bidimensional networks, through flows of expansive kinetic energy and contracting cyclical information; which grow in size and scale when we come closer to them (so points become galaxies, whose fractal points become stars, whose Non-E points become planets, whose fractal points become humans, whose Non-E points become cells, whose fractal points become atoms and so on).

So we just need to apply the ‘so obvious’ fractal, Non-Euclidean structure of reality to describe the Universe, and ‘voila!’, magic – every question is resolved, every experimental evidence fits in place. And all the whys are revealed.

Discontinuous space.

The big bang theory is based in the concept of an expansive space, merely one of the 3 possible solutions to Einstein’s field equations, which must be accepted only on that region and scale of the Universe in which space truly expands, which happens to be the interstellar space between galaxies.

But within galaxies the non-lineal, cyclical, inverse arrow of temporal information, that is the accelerated gravitational vortices of the black holes, which suck in electromagnetic entropy, converted into gravitational information, that is implode space into mass;

Thus the expansion of space between galaxies is perfectly balanced by the implosion of space curved into time vortices of mass by the galaxies. 

They balance the expansive motion of interstellar space, defining an dynamic Universe in which each scale of the fractal is in balance between its ‘expansive, entropic arrow of space and kinetic energy or lineal momentum’; (ab. Spe), and its ‘implosive, informative arrow of accelerated Cyclical Time clocks, (ab. Tiƒ):

Screen Shot 2016-06-12 at 15.32.50

In the graph, the fractal paradigm postulates a Universe of infinite scales of sizes with relative big-bangs, which are the death of implosive Mass converted back and forth into entropic motion, according to Einstein’s equation: E<=>Mc², which actually has 2 arrows of time, and was in fact first described as M=E/c², that is as a process to create mass from energy.


And the result is an immortal wobbling
 spring like Universe, where according to Einstein’s equation: E=M(c2), entropy reigns in the electromagnetic forces and light transiting between galaxies, expanding its space-time. But then it collapses within galaxies, creating with gravitational forces, in-form-ation. And this arrow of form and life is more important. Since we humans live in one of those vortices of time collapsing into mass, called the milky way, in one of its cyclical, turning planets that evolves information, through the processes of life and technology and human languages of thought. SO IT MATTERS MORE to understand mass and life than entropy and vacuum expansive space. The next graph shows schematically one of those galaxies wobbling.

Thus both arrows balance each other and the Universe has at least 2 arrows of time, ‘Spe’ or spatial entropy, and Tƒ(m), Cyclical vortices of mass, which we can measure by the angular frequency or clock-speed of the vortex. Since indeed, E=Mc², the fundamental equation of Special relativity and E=hƒ, the fundamental equation of quantum physics, can be joined together Mc²=hƒ, whereas M= h/c² ƒ.


In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century Fractal relativity.

The smaller motions are quarks, the bigger motions are quark stars, pulsars, and black holes. Today we can model any type of vortex of space-time with fractal mathematics, as each small vortex transfers the momentum to the bigger vortex, which emerges as a macroscopic entity. Thus, we conclude that a black hole is a fractal concentration of the densest matter of the Universe, quarks, since quarks represent on average more than 99.9% of the matter of our bodies. Those improvements on the details of mass theory, based on the advancement of its mathematical tools (discovery of fractals, chaos theory, and the five postulates of non-Euclidean geometry) is the natural way in which the evolution of science happens, departing from sound logic principles.

Thus mass is proportional to a constant (h/c²) multiplied by a variable frequency and its attractive power is proportional to the speed of the vortex as a hurricane (an air vortex) or a tornado (a water vortex).  

We can therefore write a Fractal ‘Generator Equation’ of the lineal entropic space and cyclical time vortices of the cosmos:, Sp(e) <=>Tƒ(m).

Now what the ‘big-bang entropy theory’ does is simply to eliminate completely the ‘mass-arrow-factor’; the time arrow of life in physics, the creation of matter, the dictum of einstein: ‘time curves space into mass’. And the informative nature of gravitation. And then indeed only entropic expansion of space between galaxy and its simple lineal equation that explains it ‘all’ matters. And of course, this feeds the ego of the astronomer as the new high priest of a new religion that knows it all and reduces it all to a size man can handle and ‘talk to’.

The religion of the big-bang vs. a sound dual theory of entropy and information.

The big bang alibi connects CERN with the ‘theoretical religion’ of physicists, quite similar to that of Abrahamic religions, in which an infinitesimal human being ‘believed’ to understand the meaning of it all, because God, the mind of the Universe reduced itself in the big bang to another infinitesimal point, easy to handle by the arrogant ego-centered bronze age peasant, which became the ‘only’ human to understand it all or the modern physicist who pretends a ‘simple lineal equation’ called the Hubble constant, V = Ho D, resumes it All.

So the religious priest will tell you ‘GOD’ explains it all, just 3 letters, 4 in the Jewish Tetragramaton, Yhwh, 5 in Allah. And there is no need for anything else. Alas from GoD to V≈hoD, from Abrahamic cults to big-bang cults 2 letters have changed to remain the same.

This is the essence of the absurd theory of the big bang, according to which V=hod, in this case not the mind but the entire Universe reduced itself to an infinitesimal point which was the ‘beginning of time and space’ that only physicists (and creationist, biblical priests that sponsor the concept – in fact ‘discovered’ by a catholic priest, Mr. Lemaitre), the high popes of science understand with an arcane ‘latin language’ called mathematics.

In reality that equation is so simple that one cannot avoid a smile, when people tells you Physicists are the absolute geniuses of mankind. It merely means that galaxies are separating because the light, an entropic, lineal, expansive force between them, elongates its wave as it moves. The meaning of it all – nuclear physicists have extracted it from that single fact – light elongates as an entropic force between galaxies:

How they got from this simple fact to resolve the birth of the Universe? Simple: they just move backwards this light expansion, and concluded that as light expands between galaxies, if we run it backwards it must have imploded into a single point, the ‘origin of it all’ which their Vhod describes as the graph shows.

Never mind light NOT only expands when free but it contracts within galaxies by the force of gravitation, balancing thus, the expansive E=mc2 death of mass into radiation, with the implosive, M=E/c2 informative implosion of light into mass particles and galaxies, making reality a wobbling balanced immortal infinity of dying mass and imploding light. Indeed, if you run backward the equation of light expansion, you just will get back to the atom of the galaxy that emitted that ray of light – AS ALL EQUATIONS ARE FINITE and happen only as long as the phenomenon they describe exists – in this case the ray of light that expands does NOT go back into an infinitesimal point because all LIGHT is produced by particles according to the E=mc2 equation.

Yet the big-bang dogma merely rejects to put the most famous equation of physics, E=mc2 at work, as the abrahamic cult denies any other ‘letters’ to God. It is only God, or Yhwh or Allah (even if actually the 3 religions says it is the same God). In physics it is only Vhod not E=mc2, what matters. You just vehemently deny the other ‘letters’ matter at all to create matter (play with words, as it is all just funny egos jumping me, i and myself only, if it had not so ugly collateral effects).

Thus the big bang is just a theory based in the wordily profession of nuclear physicists (make atomic bombs). So disregarding the arrow of information and life, which is the creative force of the Universe, physicists pretend to interpret reality only with the arrow of destruction and death, they call ‘entropy’, and merely moved backwards in time a lineal, simple equation of entropy, to pretend it moved backwards till this supposed explosion collapsed into a tractable infinitesimal point, much more smaller than the human ego. The parallels between those 2 supreme ‘theories of the subjective ego’ are multiple.

The peasant Meshu thought God was the bush their goats munched because that was his professional ‘food’. And he denied therefore the immanent sacred nature of all what exists, made of the same ‘plenum substance’, impersonal space and time. God was in his bush. The arawak who ate turtles thought God was a huge turtle over which the Earth floated.

The nuclear industry which makes nuclear bombs designed a theory of the Universe, in which only its ‘entropic process’ of explosive death accounted for the creation of the entire Universe. So of course, the people who hold the alternative sound-sound theory, called the steady state Universe, from Einstein to Hoyle, who affirmed ad maximal there would be a quasar big-bang, observed experimentally balanced by the creation of mass, laughed at them and called its theory the ‘big-bang’, arguing their makers were either ‘creationist priests’ (Lemaitre) or people working in the nuclear industry (Gamow). It was then business as usual: ad hominem attacks on Einstein and Hoyle, the P.r.ess heralding Gamow as a genius, since it backed the nuclear weapons industry and justified experiments and industries that researched them.

Yet for the big bang to work, they needed to DENY all other causes of the process of DUAL informative creation of mass and entropic destruction of mass into radiation. This of course created the paradox that physicists used e=mc2 to explode bombs but deny their equation to uphold ‘Vhod’.

At this point things became a little surrealist: physicists changed the name of the arrow of information and life and called it ‘negantropy’, the negation of death, as if negating death was a ‘sin’ and information and life was irrelevant, something Vhod could dispose of.

They also denied the most important in-formative force of the Universe, gravitation, which ‘forms’ the mass of galaxies, as time goes by. So Einstein, the only sound mind, who merely did ‘thought experiments’ said that ‘time curves space into mass’.

The 5D model of the cosmos in space – the organic structure of galaxies.

Now the 5D model of the fractal, organic Universe, does not deny Einstein, it merely expands its views, and adds fractal organic properties to the galaxy explaining better the function of those black holes, its atomic substance and working according to the known-known facts of astrophysics, in which black holes have come to dominate most of the creative processes of the galaxy. In that regard, you can compare the galaxy to a cell in a much larger scale, with mitochondria stars, of light yd-matter which end up being devoured and becoming the energy for the creation of black holes, the informative vortices, equivalent to the DNA, that swarm in huge numbers in the centerl nuclei and control its shape and provoke the reproduction of stars, with its in-formative gravitational waves.

Einstein had asked for a cut-off substance, or ‘atom of black holes’, which he could not guess at the time as quarks had not been found, but now we hint that black holes are as he thought ‘frozen stars’ of the heaviest quark families (bct quarks), and that should be the ‘realist modeling’ of black holes. As those quarks will appear in increasing numbers in accelerators, which are crossing the dark matter barrier is very likely they will be produced on those accelerators, in any of its possible varieties of dark matter that range from strangelets (s-quarks) to toplets (TTT-quarks), through Higgs decay (H->Top and anti top).

Now, all this in mathematical physics implies a constant growth of the mass of the black hole along the equation that relates the temperature and mass of a black hole: M=k/T, that is as the black hole cools down, it converts via the weak force, lighter matter into heavier quarks that increase its volume and hence its area.

The last great advances in classic black hole theory were done by Kerr, a new Zealander which defined rotary black holes with or without charge. Those would be the top quark frozen stars with positive charge and the same density at macro-scale than a black hole acting as a relative ‘proton’ acts in an atom in the center of the galaxy. While the halo should be made of strangelet quarks (negative charged), acting in this symmetry between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy, as a relative negative ‘electron’ cover, with the ud-stars and planets in the middle.

Let us establish the ‘closure’ of the perceived Universe above and below (atoms and galaxies), within the limits of human ‘absolute perception’ (we can perceive almost all what a galaxy and an atom is as the limiting membranes below and above of our existence), of the Universe and its 9 perceived scales (being 10 the logarithmic scale of the whole, which we do not perceive for the whole cosmos); by solving the most seek about equation, saint grail of physical stiences, 100 years in the search… the Unification equation of masses and charges…  which is a good way to introduce how we apply T.œ and its isomorphisms to physics:

-∆4: QUANTUM PLANES: FORCES

Forces & particles of the 2 universal membranes

image020

In the graph, the Universe is made of 2 space-time membranes, the light world of charges and stars and the string world of quark masses and black holes. We live in the electromagnetic scales, which form a network whose dark spaces are occupied by quarks (∆-1 inner world of atoms), and in the biggest eusocial structures we know of electromagnetic matter (∆+1 galaxies) by black holes, whose parameters correspond to top quark condensates.

The basic forces that create distance-space and information between them are boson strings of gravitation condensed into gluons and strong forces in the quark-mass membrane and Planck actions of light, condensed into photons in the electromagnetic scale. Those gluons and photons herd further into cyclical particles made of such fractal parts, associated into cyclical networks, called quarks and electrons. Self-similar structures form the nebulae of stars called galaxies, and the condensed of quarks called black holes. The only error of such standard model, reflected in the previous graph is the weak force which is not a spatial force but describe time events of transformation of particles between both scales.

The 2 membranes of space-time have 2 theories that must be put together to explain the dual Universe:

– Quantum theory that describes the electromagnetic membrane, not the cosmological world. Both are self-similar (as we have shown with the equation of fractal unification), but not equal. Thus, while we can admire that self-similarity, the use by quantum cosmologists of quantum equations to describe the cosmological world is erroneous.

– Relativity, the theory of gravitational forces and black holes, which are super fluid quark stars. And so it should be fusion with the theory of strong forces and quark masses.

Since each of those scales has also a fractal structure, we have to define its fractal quanta:

-Masses are vortices that grow from string actions (Nambu’s actions of boson, tachyon strings corrected to fractal dimensions and background independent.) Those motions reproduce and evolve into gluons, which are the fractals that evolve into quarks, vortices that are the fractal parts of quark stars.

Since our electrons surround those quarks, locking them inside charges must be fractal vortices with a larger number of dimensions than those bidimensional masses. So 3 bidimensional quarks of 3×1/3rd =1 charge must lock their mass in the x,y,z planes to enter in a 3-dimensional exchange of Entropy and information with the electrons of our light-space. So quark masses attract electrons with their gravitational force inwards, and electrons shield themselves with their electromagnetic force outwards. The balance of that tug of war is a complementary atom.

In that regard the entanglement of both membranes is dynamic and based in the network structure of non-Euclidean spaces in which its points are connected by ‘lines of communications’ which are waves of smaller particles; leaving in between dark spaces which allow the other membrane to entangle itself; as it happens with the blood/reproductive and nervous/informative network of a human vital space. In the case of the 2 membranes of space-time the membrane of dark Entropy/matter (gravitational membrane) plays the role of the nervous/informative network that connects the blood/electromagnetic network.

We talk of 2 space-time networks, defined by 2 spatial forces – lineal strings of gravitation and lineal waves of light – and 2 clock-vortices of time: gravitational masses and electronic charges.

The emergence of those st-1 worlds into the st+1 scale of galactic entities (where we are the st-relative intermediate scale sandwiched between both) is caused by the eusocial evolution of enormous quantities of those fractal units: vortices of quarks made of ‘strong’ forces, whose fractal particles are gluons, gather together as fractal parts of quark stars, pulsars and black holes.

While our world – the light space we inhabit – is sandwiched between quarks and galaxies

Its smallest actions are h-Planck constants, which are the fractal parts that form light photons, which are the fractal parts gathered into an electron nebulae, the basic clock of time of our world, whose plasma herds (ionized state), associated with complementary protons creates the world stars. Finally vortices of star herds form galaxies, which turn around their Kerr black holes, and so are self-similar st+1 objects of the st-1 atoms positioned in space by the gravitational force of the central quarks.

Thus, the invariance of topological form and scale of all those vortices that makes macrocosms emerge from microcosms is caused by the complementary structure of its central mass vortices that anchor the electronic and star Entropy of our light membrane:

Quarks anchor atoms and black holes anchor galaxies.

Recap. Our space-time is made of h-quanta of light. We exist as evolved forms of a light space-time network anchored by the nuclei of atoms, made of quanta of strong forces, called gluons and quarks belonging to the gravitational space-time membrane.

Some precisions on the formalisms of both membranes.

A quanta, which is interpreted as an abstract, probabilistic number in quantum theory is a fractal piece of space-time, a complementary system made of bites of spatial-Entropy and bits of temporal-information. This is self-evident even in quantum theory, where Planck defined those quanta as actions with the dimension of Entropy and time.

The Universe is indeed made of actions of Entropy and time, as when we say ‘I don’t have more Entropy or time to do this’. We are not solid spatial forms, a Maya of the senses, so common among ‘naïve realist’ physicists, accustomed to touch the solid metal of their machines, but we exist in a spiritual Universe made of actions of Entropy and time, which occupy a vital space and have a time rhythm. And each of the self-similar fractal worlds/membranes of the Universe has a minimal unit or fractal quanta, a type of st- point with a different volume of Entropy and information that defines the space-time membrane.

We exist in the space-time membrane of light made of h-quanta. And its formalism, later studied in more detail is well-known to physicists (quantum physics), and requires some modifications on its interpretation to adapt it to the wider concept of fractal spaces and cyclical times (Correspondence principle).

But there is another space-time membrane of gravitational quanta, whose formalism requires more changes, since being an invisible membrane, we humans cannot use easily the experimental method to study them, especially when considering the st-1 quanta so small, in the Planck length scale that there is no way we can observe and prove our models. So we are left only with proper formalisms of its macrocosmic entities and effects, which Einstein described with general relativity.

As of two day two formalism, which require further corrections are useful to that aim: the formalism of boson, tachyon strings defined by Nambu’s actions, adapted to a background independent world (they are the actions that create the membrane, not actions that float in an abstract metric coordinates), and the use of fractal dimensions and non-Euclidean geometries, unknown to physics.

Another formalism used to describe the gravitational minimal units is the one elaborated by Nottale6, whose unit is λ, lambda, also called the cosmological constant. In scale relativity, Nottale defined this constant as Λ = 1/L2, the minimal unit of the gravitational Universal membrane, where L is the minimal length of that membrane, the smallest piece of space. It is essentially a string, but string theory must overcome the error of Newtonian Absolute Space to become useful to describe the gravitational scale, as its minimal unit ‘independent of the abstract background of membrane space-time’.

Such formalism which borrows from the work of those 2 pioneers is part of the more complex ‘courses’ of Multiple Spaces-Times, beyond the scope of this introductory lectures.

The other formalism that is not completed is the formalism of weak forces, since Physicists unaware of the temporal nature of those events have tried unsuccessfully to describe it with the same spatial exchange of particles (Higgs mechanism7) when weak forces are temporal events, and the W and Z particles brief states in the process of transformation of particles of our electromagnetic membrane into masses of the gravitational membrane. Reason why those forces break the symmetry – as time is not symmetric but hierarchic and why the Higgs has not been found and will never be found – it is a particle only needed if it was a weak force.

Unfortunately we cannot perceive the lambda scale of strings. But, essentially with those 2 membranes the strong gravitational world and the electromagnetic world and its 3 ±i scales, we can explain all the physical properties, events and entities of reality.

Recap. The formalism of the light-membrane is described by quantum physics and it is correct, except for the errors in the description of the temporal, weak force. The formalism of the gravitational membrane departs from its minimal unit, the boson, tachyon string, which must be adapted to a background independent gravitational membrane of which it is its minimal action and the fractal, finite nature of dimensions.

The 3 scales of the 2 membranes.

Why there are 3 main scales of social evolution in both membranes? The trivial answer is that we are always sandwiched between a lower and upper scale and so we always perceive 3 even if the number of scales might be infinite.

And so from the human p.o.v. any entity or system of Entropy and information stretches in 3 scales.

For example, your organism is basically a fractal of biological Entropy and information extended in 3 scales, cells, individuals and societies, of which you are a relative cell.

In the physical, fractal, Non-Euclidean structures of the 2 membranes of space-time, there are also 3 basic scalar structures:

A complementary atom extends on both membranes. In each of those membranes, quanta evolve and form social groups, emerging into a new topology, a higher scale of Entropy and form:

-The scale of h-quanta form light and electronic nebulae, made of dense photons.

– While its inner gravitational world of quarks can be decomposed in 3 scales: The lambda scale of ‘strings’ are the components of gluons, which are the components of quarks.

Emergence of parts into wholes of a higher scale is possible due to the other 2 invariances/dualities of physical systems: invariance of topological form and motion allows invariance of scale.

What about the cosmological world? Again we must consider that cosmological systems have 3 scales, the scale of particles, (quarks, electrons and atoms), which are the units of cosmological bodies, black holes, quark stars and electronic stars, which are the atoms of galaxies. Those 3 scales thus interact in all the organic networks of galaxies.

There might be another scale, the Universe, where galaxies are atoms of the Universe (and the Einstein-Walker model of cosmology treats them in fact as Hydrogen atoms); which would itself be a unit of a hyper-universe, whose ‘explosion’ at an even faster ‘infinite speed’ that dark Entropy, would explain the ‘inflationary age’ of the big-bang. But there is little evidence of this final scale today, and an enormous number of Pythagorean and hyperbolic errors in the formulations of the cosmological big-bang in a single space-time continuum to take serious that theory.

Recap. All what we can be sure of, is what we can perceive – the limits of our existence, sandwiched between atoms and islands-universes, the original name Kant gave to galaxies.

Dimensions of particles and Universal membranes.

In that sense, to fully grasp the difference between both worlds, the dark and light world, we must understand the basic isomorphisms of fractal dimensions. Dimensions are in any system of the Universe, as in the case of light, arrows of time (motions of Entropy, information and reproduction), perceived according to the Paradox of Galileo also as ‘spatial surfaces. Thus, they are always local, fractal dimensions which are limited by the extension of the ‘species’ in which those dimensions create a ‘vital space’. So dimensions are dynamic as the species they create grows or shrinks, evolves into more complex beings or becomes destroyed. Entities grow in dimensions as they grow in size.

Further on, more complex informative species ad dimensions.

This happens normally when a form is bigger and has inner particles. But in the case of quarks it happens, because the quark is faster and has more inner speed/form.

All in all, the total number of dimensions of a system is relative to our detail of analysis. For example, those quarks are made of one-dimensional strings, made of non-Euclidean points (each one with its 3 inner dimensions), which have a total of 3 × 3 dimensions (3 of their Non-Euclidean points and 3 of the string of points). That is why physicists in detail use 9+1 time dimension to study strings, but from our perspective without detail, they are just one-dimensional lines of a quark vortex.

Yet if we transcend to the world of quarks we consider them 1-dimensional. So those strings form gluons and quarks, which from our higher world are perceived as bidimensional mass-vortices.

Finally 3 color-locked quarks interact with the world of light of 3 dimensions, and the world of electrons of 4 dimensions, which are the 3 dimensions of Euclidean space and one of form, of color.

On the other hand, the biggest entities have more dimensions, as they include the smaller entities within its whole. It is the law of fractal dimensionality. It states that a fractal part of a bigger st-scale of information has fewer dimensions such as:

Law of dimensionality: Fractal ∑∆-1 = 1/3rd Dimensions of st

Since any st-Point will have 3 inner dimensions. Thus the dimensions of information of any system grow with a cubic power law as the system grows in scale. In simple terms, a 3-dimensional being transcends as a mere cellular point of the new whole.

Those 3-inner dimensions, as in the case of light, are ultimately the dynamic arrows of time, or wills, or physiological networks, or organic drives of the being.

For example, a human being has 3 dimensional networks, which are our physiological systems. The blood network of Entropy, the nervous network of information and the endocrine network of reproduction. Those are the 3 systems around which cells and organs build up. So humans can be described as a 3-dimensional network with 3 wills: to absorb Entropy for our blood/ digestive system, to absorb information for our sensorial/ informative system and to reproduce through our hormonal system.

The abstract, geometric description of dimensions is secondary to the functional, dynamic, organic meaning of those dimensions. The how is less revealing than the why. The why of dimensional motions are the search of Entropy and information of any entity, whose paths become fixed in space and appear as dimensions. Or they are the reproductive strings of self-similar cells that form the physiological network of Entropy or information of the system.

In the quantum world, the constant exchanges of Entropy and information of the electron with the external Universe are described with 2 simple quantum numbers that correspond also to the complex actions in space-time of its cellular photons and the of time:

-The 2 first numbers describe at photonic scale, the reproduction of photons, part of the wave (main number) and its social evolution (l number). At the electronic level they define its e<=>I, Entropy level and formal structure.

-The spin number defines two clone electrons, often reproduced with different spin in a particles deocupling and the magnetic number the social organization of those electrons established by an external magnetic field. Thus those numbers describe the ‘paths’ of particles in search of its dimensional arrows of Entropy and information.

The dimensions of light are also the dimensions of the energetic/magnetic field, the informative/electric field and the reproductive length-speed, or social evolution (color/frequency).

In that regard, it is also interesting to observe the relationship between both planes, the light plane which ‘feeds’ as the lower st-1 space the dense fractal, cellular points of light of the electron. When considering the basic isomorphisms between planes of space-time we noticed that a force, st-1 of Entropy, becomes st-bits of information of the upper scale, which uses them as pixels to gauge information. Thus the magnetic, width field that acts as Entropy in light becomes the informative, electron magnetic number.

Life beings also have a dimension of height/information that is maximal in man, the most informative being of the cosmos, and a dimension of Entropy/length which is maximal in energetic predators.

Recap: Dimensions are morphological expressions of the arrows of time, seen as fixed forms of space.

 

THE SCALE OF PHYSICS: OBSERVABLE, QUANTUM SCALES. PARTICLES AND ATOMS.

Observational hazzards: uncertainty of max. ∆-|x| scales.

Physical sciences are concerned strictly as a ‘stience’ of the space-time scalar Universe, with the smaller and larger observable scales, ∆<|2|, which are those in which quantum and gravitational laws dominate the spectra of species, the particle and atomic scales.

Philosophically the most important question arouse by physics, is why from the scalar perspective of human beings, the smallest scale (atomic scales) and the largest one observable (galactic scale) are self-similar? It is this an objective fact, or a subjective fact derived of the loss of information and selective deformation of the ∆o relative ‘human observer’?

Of course in the scalar Universe the same laws apply in all scales of stience. So physical principles, which are ultimately deducible from the 10 ∆symmetries, apply also to many other physical systems. The epistemology of stience requires in fact that since stience is ultimately the perception of a super organism of any scale of the Universe with a biased distance in time and space, or human perspective on it, such as:

Similar sciences ≈ ∆o±st (plane of the given science).

Meaning that systems at a similar distance in size and time of man above and below in the scales of the 5th dimension (such as the atom and the galaxy, the cell and the nation, the insect and the robot) seem to us similar in laws and forms, while being ultimately super organisms.

So humans see atoms and galaxies in similar fashion and we shall unify them with simple equations.

Astrophysics therefore is the stience of the ∆±3 scales, astronomy proper studies the galactic super organism, ∆+3 and physics proper the ∆-3 atomic organism.

Again here we differ given the ‘added rigor’ that the correspondence between planes and stiences requires, from the lousy philosophy of scientific names of the present human classification of knowledge. So the next scale, that of the molecule will obey physical chemistry but will become strictly, the realm of ‘chemistry, the science of the ∆-2 scale.

If we consider the ‘absolute’ decametric scale, used in this 3rd line more for reasons of ‘wordpress’ programming (to make above a nice series of 1,2,3 etc.) and as it is simpler to understand, then we shall call this first perceived scale, fully functional, the 2-atomic scale above the 1. light-electronic scale studied by metaphysics, not only by physics – as it requires analysis on how the mind perceives light, how perception influences physics and even beyond develop epistemological methods of veracity regarding metaphysical theories such as string theory and the evaporation of black holes of which there is no evidence whatsoever.

 

THE PHYSICAL 5D±1 SCALES OF MATTER.

FROM CHEMISTRY TO GEOLOGY 

In the 4th scale the language changes. Molecules are no longer externally guided by quantum laws but by thermodynamic laws, as its clocks of time, and rods of space have changed. So the species that come after the molecular scale, matter species transition to these new clocks of time and rods of space.

We enter therefore in an entire new Universe as the language of time – clocks of information – and space – distances and motions, change. Let us remember first in which consists this change:

QLL

In the graph, self-centred in the thermodynamic scale of biological beings and matter, we see how the clocks of time accelerate between scales downwards and the rods of space or radius of those cycles grows in lineal fashion, but both remain constant through a long stretch of at least 3 ∆ scales. Temperature then becomes the intermediate language, departing from assemblies of quantum numbers into assemblies of thermodynamic ranges.

If the correct Bohmian pilot wave theory of quantum physics ad the guiding equation of the ∆-1 field-wave, which in turn determines the position of particles, considering then both the present, wave, Schrodinger’s view an the Past to Future, field-particle interaction of the Bohmian, Heisenberg’ matricial point of view for a full description of quantum events, we obtain a closer similarity on the equations of quantum physics and thermodynamics, which shows how essentially those statistical concepts (also applied to socio-biological systems) can describe rather deterministically, the structure of a system of any 2 such dual scales.

Thermodynamic Matter.

We thus conclude that matter is thermodynamics. That is in space we see a super organism of molecular atoms ensembled into a ternary system, we can define with a generator or in classic thermodynamic equations. This space-system will in turn have a development in time, which will be thermodynamic, guided by parameters of time related to temperature and space, related to state. But in essence the laws of those systems will obey the ensemble laws of social evolution of parts into wholes.

A thermodynamic system thus will be initially  a precisely defined region of the universe under study.

In classic theory, everything in the universe except the system is known as the surroundings – the ∆+1 world-universe of GST.

A system is separated from the remainder of the universe by a boundary which may be notional or not, but which by convention delimits a finite volume. Exchanges of work, heat, or matter between the system and the surroundings take place across this boundary; which therefore becomes the GST membrane of the system of max. Spe (topology-function).

Boundaries thus define an internal region where the thermodynamic cycles of exchanges of energy and negantropy≈formal state takes place. Energy is ‘stored’ as information, when the state of the system changes. Ensembles follow decametric laws that create new ’emerging domains’, and so on. Let us investigate the fundamental equivalences between thermodynamics and GST.

In practice, a thermodynamic boundary is simply an imaginary dotted line drawn around a volume when there is going to be a change in the internal energy of that volume. Anything that passes across the boundary that affects a change in the internal energy needs to be accounted for in the energy balance equation. The volume can be the region surrounding a single atom resonating energy, such as Max Planck defined in 1900; it can be a body of steam or air in a steam engine, such as Sadi Carnot defined in 1824; it can be the body of a tropical cyclone, such as Kerry Emanuel theorized in 1986 in the field of atmospheric thermodynamics; it could also be just one nuclide (i.e. a system of quarks) as hypothesized in quantum thermodynamics, which essentially studies those regions of the universe in which the laws of quantum and thermodynamic planes of existence converge and can be studied together.

Boundaries are of four types: fixed, moveable, real, and imaginary. For example, in an engine, a fixed boundary means the piston is locked at its position; as such, a constant volume process occurs. In that same engine, a moveable boundary allows the piston to move in and out. For closed systems, boundaries are real while for open system boundaries are often imaginary.

Generally, thermodynamics distinguishes three classes of systems, defined in terms of what is allowed to cross their boundaries:

screen-shot-2016-11-27-at-10-01-00In the graph, classic thermodynamics classifies systems according to boundaries (|-Spe region). When boundary does not exist (open system), we cannot fully talk of a thermodynamic system as one of it ternary elements is not’, so a whole is not created.

Then we find in the other extreme an isolated system, which does not have in a sense boundary, as it does not communicate with the external fractal Universe and becomes a whole in itself. So the more interesting cases are those in which the ‘monad’ is not fully isolated but does communicate and exchanges energy in the form of work and heat, and information in the form of state and shape of the system. Those systems who do not move: ∆e=0 (mechanically isolated), those who do not deform (thermally isolated), ∆i=0, are partial cases of the full thermodynamic system, a closed system, which allows both changes on e and i, work and heat-state.

Now the fundamental thermodynamic law is that time never stops, so when one arrow of time stops – such as entropic motion – another arrow of time, growth of information, of form-in-action, of form, grows. In the case of a thermodynamic ensemble, the external motion ceases and the internal motion, or evolution of information starts. We can talk of locomotion and evolution as the two internal and external, ∆+1, ∆-1 forms of motion more fundamental to the Universe, and in that sense understand thermodynamics as the change from external to internal motion states.

Thermodynamic equilibrium. The present state.
As time passes in an isolated system, internal differences in the system tend to even out and pressures and temperatures tend to equalize, as do density differences. A system in which all equalizing processes have gone to completion is considered to be in a state of thermodynamic equilibrium; or present state, from which it can go both ways. So at thermodynamic equilibrium the present system becomes balanced between the past-entropy and future-state form possible paths.

In thermodynamic equilibrium, a system’s properties are, by definition, unchanging in time. Systems in equilibrium are much simpler and easier to understand than systems which are not in equilibrium. Often, when analysing a thermodynamic process, it can be assumed that each intermediate state in the process is at equilibrium. This will also considerably simplify the situation. Thermodynamic processes which develop so slowly as to allow each intermediate step to be an equilibrium state are said to be reversible processes.

By definition thus there are 3 time arrows in thermodynamics: present, equilibrium (liquid) states; past, entropic (gaseous) states of growing heat and diminishing form and its inverse, relative future, solid, crystal states of maximal information and min. Spe:

figtu

In the graph, we can compare the different states of thermodynamic matter from the upper perspective of its relationship with gravitational states. Here the obvious connection are the topological elements that are common to EFE equations of space-time topologies and thermodynamic states. But the language will change again as the clocks of gravitational masses are different to those of thermodynamic heat vibrations.

States and processes
When a system is at equilibrium under a given set of conditions, it is said to be in a definite thermodynamic state. The state of the system can be described by a number of state quantities that do not depend on the process by which the system arrived at its state. They are called intensive variables or extensive variables according to how they change when the size of the system changes. The properties of the system can be described by an equation of state which specifies the relationship between these variables. State may be thought of as the instantaneous quantitative description of a system with a set number of variables held constant.

A thermodynamic process may be defined as the energetic evolution of a thermodynamic system proceeding from an initial state to a final state. It can be described by process quantities. Typically, each thermodynamic process is distinguished from other processes in energetic character according to what parameters, such as temperature, pressure, or volume, etc., are held fixed. Furthermore, it is useful to group these processes into pairs, in which each variable held constant is one member of a conjugate pair. Let us then first define the parameters of Spe and Tiƒ in thermodynamics which are:

  • Pressure, which is inverse to the volume and hence inverse to the Spe, a parameter of Tiƒ relative order, such as ∆P->∆Tiƒ.
  • Temperature inverse to preasure, hence initially the parameter of Spe, parallel to volume≈temperature≈Spe.
  • Volume: the space-time configuration underlying the thermodynamic process both in spatial extension and form.

So once those 3 relative parameters, Pressure (Tiƒ), Temperature (Spe) and Volume (static, present ST) are understood, classic studied thermodynamic processes are ‘ceteris paribus’ cases which are partial equations of the Γ(states) Generator:

  • Isobaric process: occurs at constant pressure
  • Isochoric process: occurs at constant volume (also called isometric/isovolumetric)
  • Isothermal process: occurs at a constant temperature
  • Adiabatic process: occurs without loss or gain of energy by heat
  • Isentropic process: a reversible adiabatic process, occurs at a constant entropy
  • Isenthalpic process: occurs at a constant enthalpy
  • Steady state process: occurs without a change in the internal energy

THERMODYNAMIC HUMAN SCALES.

ATOMIC SYSTEMS. THE ATOMIC ORGANISM AND THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.

The atom the organism of the lower scales of physics. The ternary, i-logic topological structure of atoms.

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 00.01.57

An atom is a space-time field divided in 3 species, informative masses or quarks, energetic gravitational and electromagnetic networks and an intermediate space-time, the electronic nebulae, which bends light into ‘fractal’, ultra-dense ∆-1 photons of light. As such it can be studied with the same 5D space-time structural ‘generator’ of any other scale of the 5th dimension.

In the graph, an atom is a space-time field divided in 3 space-time zones: its informative quark center, the nucleus; the external reproductive membrane, made of electrons, which evolve socially in bigger Spe x Tiƒ membranes when atoms become molecules; while informative, gravitational and energetic, light networks shape their intermediate space-time.

The topology of the atom is thus clear. The electron acts as an external ‘spherical plane’, a membrane of Entropy. In the center quarks are the informative vortices. In between Entropy and form is transferred with forces, which often decouple, reproducing new particles and antiparticles. There are 3 informative families of quarks-mass, due to the evolution of information in 3 ages or horizons of increasing form: each quark family is thus an age in the evolution of informative matter.

Astrœ-physics, by the unification of charges and masses, into a single group, that of time vortices, with a symmetry of scale, based in Log10 functions, is both a cosmological and atomic science.

In the strict sense, unlike astrophysics, which studies only the external motions of physical systems in space, and dedicates to the study of the other 5 motions, generation, growth, evolution, diminution and extinction, ‘partial theories’ (big bang theories of explosive deaths and births, H-R diagram of evolution of stars, etc.), atomic systems have been studied in more detail due to the closeness of observations. So molecular atomic systems, are perfectly described with an architectonical precision as they build up our scales of existence. Trouble in definition start within the atomic scale when our observing instruments, which CANNOT be smaller than the electronic mind that observes, try to analyze the minimal quanta of information of our universe, h-quanta, and of our space, c², light space times.

Now, the study of the full 6 motions is better expressed with the jargon and language of 5D sciences, which includes clear changes of paradigm, such as the study of the worldcycle of which any worldline is obviously a partial ‘element’ (as all lineal geometries of space, Sp, are mere ‘parts’ of a larger cyclical geometry of time, Tƒ, to which they will tend in any ‘future function’, sub-tended into the future.)

Now physics is NOT really more than the study of lineal motions and all other elements of generation, growth, diminution, etc, with mathematical equations, specifically, since Newton, differential equations. So it is important to run a parallel analysis of what they mean.

And in that sense we can talk of 3 great ages of mathematical physics, in a full cycle:

  • The beginning with numerical systems of calculus of ‘quanta of physics’
  • The age of differential equations
  • The age of imaginary Complex equations
  • The age of numerical calculus of quanta of physics.

In as much as Physics has not a qualitative purpose, it easily reduced to the study of physical parameters with partial differential equations, which are merely the lineal version of the more complex ‘curved geometries’, in which the ß ∆x difference between the curve and the lineal function is considered a variable constant.

So let us also start parallel to physics with the analysis of

The zero sum of entropy. The program of Existence as a zero sum.

The entropy of the Universe is constant as the worldcycle is a zero sum of entropy. Tƒ fully understand this we must rewrite the equation of entropy in terms of 5D functions.

∆S= entropy dS is equal to this amount of energy for the reversible process divided by the absolute temperature of the system:

Screen Shot 2015-10-14 at 00.31.42

We have assumed the temperature is constant but what truly is constant is entropy because it is a reversible closed cycle with the process of death and the asymptotic arrows between planes of existence that balance the missing quantities in a single plane, when we consider the ‘inverse loop’ taking place in the i±2 transfers and actions of death:

Thus dS=0, and d Q r/T=0 becomes a Lagrangian where the active clock of time is temperature and Qr the energy of the system.

From where we can consider different equations of thermodynamics.

Thus the main difference of cyclical time, vs. lineal time is the concept of entropy, in the cyclical Universe the entropy of the Universe for the whole system is zero. And so it is for all relative systems, as they are balanced by transfers between planes of existence, notably the positive order acquired in the long arrow of informative social evolution, ∆+1, and then in the fast explosive death reversed process, when the wave falls fast into the past, erasing all its information of future, higher planes of existential organization: ∂’’œ<<∑∑∆-2

Now to understand quantum jumps through 2 Universal ∆-planes, an amazing feat that puts in contact a macrocosms with its lowest cellular/atomic planes, we should consider this astounding explosion of expansive Entropy to be balanced with the total gain in entropy by the same system during its arrow of Life:

Life Cycle: Tƒ-1: Seminal wave:  ∑ S (life semi-action-cycle, h/2) = ∑ ∆-1> ∆<Max. Energy (youth) > Reproductive ∑œ wave > Max. Information: Tƒ+1 = ∆S-2: Death

In the act of death the expansion of entropy which jumps down at exponential rhythms the social creative process that lasted an entire life, the growth of information and order, or arrow of future of life becomes disintegrated in an instant.

So it happens in physical matter in the process of nuclear bombs, novae, quasars and big bangs. The difference is that the creative process from biochemical molecules to cells and fetus emerged into the ∆-scale for a long life which lasted so much time, but changed so little the volume of vital space of the system, explodes now in a quantum of time, dissolving all its networks.

It is precisely that difference of speed of life <<<< to death in the acceleration and deceleration of the process of collapse what creates an apparent winning arrow for entropy. But this idea would be misleading since for a much longer period a particle, a soul of a living, biological entity, a crystal in a planet has created order, at a very slow tempo. Time might be considered subjective in this orderly long time processes and perhaps it is. That is we can construct a frame of reference in which time cycles do not suffer accelerations and decelerations in positions of change of state, from relative past, to present to futures and back.

But the overwhelming evidence is this:

– The maximal speed of destruction of information is in the negative max. ∆S moment of death, which lasts hardly any time: ∆S x ∏ Tƒ = Death, disorder

– The creation of information in slow, cold environments is the opposite arrow that lasts much more in time but hardly consumes any external information.

Both should be balanced completing the conservative laws of fields with equipotential, immortal paths of eternal motion.

A Space-Time cycle of finite Duration, or life-death cycle is thus defined as:

∆-1, ∑∆-1>S∆<ST>Tƒ<<S∆-2 if we are to use algebraic notation of the different partial equations of a world cycle.

If we define the function, W=∫∫∂ (a,e,I,o,u) dtds=0, as the worldcycle or function of existence of a system between birth and extinction, this is the fundamental equation we seek to resolve for any being. 

Now when the meaning of temperature is understood we can consider again, the fundamental events of all the scale of physics with an enhanced understanding of the meaning of its parameters.

Tƒ start with the frequency of the light wave, the charge an accelerated vortex like the mass, with its curvature Q, and G, form a system of clocks of time which define perfectly a beat, related to an energy, which is inverse. And so we find ourselves with different degree of integration worldcycle or minimal forceful action, of such parameters, as:

H = E x V, T = d Q/ d S= d Q x dO, which we call Order, the inverse function to entropy.

And so on: , we define a simple law of the least action, to unify the fundamental equation of ach of those scales:

F= A x E, -∂H/∂q=dp/dt and its inverse function, ∂H/∂p=dq/dt

Indeed, in cyclical time, we consider that entropy has as a secondary feature the quantity of information of the system, multiplied by conserving its actions in the multiple hyperbolic S∆-1,2, fields of existence

Thus in the scales of matter we find, the functions of existence, in the actions, H, T,

Those 5 actions determine therefore a Program of existence, which all systems follow in a mechanical, vegetative or conscious manner. And thus we can also write the 5th isomorphism, as a Generator Equation of all the actions of the Universe, written as a dynamic, temporal feed back equation or a static, organic, structural, spatial equation:

∑Se <=> Tƒ ….. or Se x Tƒ= ST±4

Whereas:

∑ represents the social gathering of individuals into Universals (∂u).

S signifies the motions in space, (∂a).

e signifies the increases of structural energy of the system, ∂e.

<=> in the dynamic expression or X in the structural one, signifies the combination of Se and Ti which gives birth to ‘reproductive’ actions and offspring: ∂œ.

And Ti signifies, the perceptive actions of the being, ∂i

And this 5 actions are represented also in the ‘philosophical equation’ Sp x It = ST, whereas E≈ ∂e, S≈∂a, I≈∂I, x≈∂o, ST≈ ∂U

Again we use any of the different expressions of the Generator Equation, despite the initial confusion it might create, so the readers learns to ‘change its chip’ from the quantitative, single, exact analysis of reality to a conceptual, qualitative, multiple, ‘fractal’, iterative perception based in similarities and homologies, parallelisms and conceptual complexity.

Ultimately only when he changes his mind’s frame and accepts those enriching dualities and isomorphisms he will be able to acquire the ‘enlightened’, ‘Buddhist’ perception of the pantheist Universe required to fully integrate itself within the whole.

This is the Program of Existence that all systems follow to survive, deduced from the structural elements of any fractal Superorganism of scalar space and cyclical time, which will try to maintain stable its ST-form and reproduce it beyond death in small ‘actions’ and full ‘reproductions’ of the being, such as:

∑œ Reproductions of a being across its ST±4 planes is the existential game we all play.

We can write the Generator equation, as  ∑ExI=ST,  this alternative ‘old expression’ of the Generator means that to “Exist’ is to absorb and emit entropy/energy and information in a series of actions, ∑, which try to maintain a system in balance with its space-time environment. And all this is managed by the relative zero-point, Tƒ, of the system:

To Exi=st is therefore a tautological word. The rules of existence are in that sense common to all beings. What will vary is the specific form in which a certain particle, head or informative centre, Tƒ, manage to survive by its actions. Or fail.

 

V. HUMAN PLANES.

 

∆+2: EARTH SYSTEMS:  GEOLOGY AND ECOLOGY

 

SUMMARY.

Introduction. The Earth superorganism and its Isomorphisms.

The III Ages of the Earth

The Geological Age.

The Life Age.

The Metal-earth.

Introduction: The Earth super-organism and its Isomorphisms

6TH SCALE: PLANETS: THE 3 EARTHS
BIOHISTORY3

In the graph, the isomorphism of the whole – humanity as the mind of planet Earth.

 

The Earth super-organism and its Isomorphisms

5 life

 

Of all the systems of reality the most important to mankind and the most forgotten is the Earth’s system, our ∆+2 world.

It sustains us, it explains us, in birth and death, evolution and extinction, it is the alpha and omega, the ‘god’ in mystique terms of mankind. The Earth-sun system is thus all and its understanding with its slow tempo of evolution (as a bigger system, Max. Sp = Min. Tƒ) is the key to all other subsystems that take place in this planet. There is a simple 3 ages equation for such system:

Gaia (past-life) < Human History (present-active system) > Economic system (humans & machines) Future

This simple equation of the 3 Earths thus includes biologic systems (Gaia), Human Systems (History) and economic ecosystems of machines (Metal-Earth), from a larger, ∆+1 analysis of its super-organisms.

It is the way in which a civilized, survival society of humans would study its reality as part of a bigger whole, trying to manage that temporal equation in such a manner that the present (History) survives and controls the future (Mechanocene) and the past (Gaia) selecting the positive fruits of the tree of science, eliminating its lethal goods (robotics and weapons of max. information and max. energy that will extinguish and substitute us) and maintaining a balance with the life, welfare goods provided by Gaia which make us survive.

But all this can only be understood if humans would understand the super organism of the Earth, since geology as his father Hutton put it, is precisely the study of the Earth’s super organism and all its micro-organisms, living in its surface.

Thus we talk of  life organisms, as species related to lower and higher planes of existence and time rhythms of the Earth to obtain its motion-energy, information-reproduction åctions that sustain it.

If humans are born every 9 months, women have menstruation every month, this is because of the earth-sun orbit and the moon orbit. If civilizations die away every 800 years in the classic period is due to the small cycle of climatic growth of nomadic warriors. If Britain started the Industrial R=evolution is due to its geographical island position and carbon-iron mines. To which degree all this is part of a set-up evolutionary process of planets into life and how much freedom has history to do variations on the same theme, is part of the metaphysical understanding of the game of existence. Systems though show a much higher order than humans with its limited information and general bias towards entropic arrows (physical sciences) can and want to recognize.

We do not obviously renounce to this dynamic understanding just because ‘humans’ feel offended in their anthropomorphic need to be different, when concepts like sentient, consciousness, perception, will, are introduced in the scientific discourse.

For one thing, to know the origin and cause of an action, improves enormously and simplifies what we explain. The case of Ptolemy vs. Copernicus is obvious. Ptolemy, the anthropomorphic scientist made all kind of complex cycles to explain from a human centered point of view the motions of the cosmos. Copernicus simplified by understanding the point of view of the sun, as the dominant one of the relative motions of the solar system.

And yet, if for the sun-earth system, the sun dominates, in the earth-human system, it is the Earth which matters as the dominant element, and its zero point dual system (membrane and nuclei), which ultimately might be the origin of the program of evolution. Its variations is what humans can control with its policies of control of the Earth. So far they don’t. They reject any attempt to follow the laws of social evolution and manage the Earth’s evolution for its survival. And so they are mostly treated in those sections as apperceiving automatons of their own process of evolution and extinction. ‘Respect must be earned’ and humans are not doing much to survive and earn the respect of a game of existence they don’t even recognize.

By knowing there is a zero-point in control of most systems, which is enacting with certain ordered, causal laws, its åctions, to synchronize them between its planes of ∆±4 existence with the goal of surviving and reproducing itself into a repetitive series of generations that maintain its i-logic form immortal, we are simplifying enormously the understanding of the whys f the Universe and cam make predictions, about the structure of systems. Consider the case of the Earth’s point of view.

We always maintained it would have a center of crystal iron, its zero point, which somehow would be intimately connected with its external membrane, the earth’s layer of maximal information where sensorial life exists, because that is the generic structure of the Tƒ dual dominant system of all Universal fractal points.

Recently has been found definitely the existence of that iron crystal core, and what has surprised all scientists, its intimately connection with the membrane through the ‘Earth’s relative homunculus, that is, its mapping of its sensorial external membrane in the center (the so called anti-continents that surround the crystalline nucleus) : The Earth’s through its anti-continents produces flows of magma that regulate the motions of the continental crust, defining the ages of geological life of its planet, and ultimately through its relative changes in the fields of energy/temperature, water/gas/solid states of its crusts the rhythms of evolution, which follow the 3 ages horizons dimensions of time and its arrows.

Now that point of view is not necessarily smart. Let us be clear about it: the smaller quantum human being is more informative, intelligent (max. S = Min. Tƒ) that the Earth’s core, but that does not mean the Earth can program man with its geological cycles as it has done with life, by sheer energetic force. Are we then just a stage in the evolution of a planet with an iron core and a silica layer which seems geared to create chipped machines? This is the ultimate question about the future of the earth’s system, not the stupidest of all anthropomorphisms, the silly-nilly fear that we are killing the earth, but its mutation from the Anthropocene into the Mechanocene, from the world of life and history into the world of machines? Can be this managed, or it means our social extinction as a species?

So what is most interesting of this humble approach, once the philosopher or scientists have done with his ‘anthropomorphic hang-ups’ is the details on each structural system, regarding where is its zero point and how it enacts its åctions, once formed (so galaxies once the black hole is formed, start an orderly growth into spirals, hurricanes once the zero-point is formed become structured and grow faster, crystals, once the central cell is formed enacts its time-reversed growth outwards) is the titanic need of mankind to understand the problem and take the beast by the horns, to harness the Earth’s future, to become the ‘center’ of the Earth’s will and construct a perfect world.

So we shall study the 3 ages of the Earth, Gaia, history and the Mechanocene in 3 sub-sections both in this introductory upper line course and the detailed lower part analysis of Gaia, the world and stock (the global brain of digital flows of money which guide the company-mothers of machines that terraform the Earth into the Mechanocene).

 

THE EARTH

 

The 10 Isomorphisms 

0th isomorphism: Self: Œ-Point x ∞ World = Constant mind Mapping

It is the alpha and omega, the 0 and 10th isomorphism: the point of the mind, site of the will, which orders the system internally in its ∑∆-1 parts and perceives it as an ∆-whole, part of its ∆+1 society. The topological center of a sphere, which can according to Poincare’s conjecture represent without deformation its whole world in the infinitesimal fractal, non-Euclidean mind point.

1st isomorphism: Fractal Generator: Its 3 organs/networks: Spe≤≥ ST≤≥Tƒ

Its 3 organic/network topologies in space… and 3 x 3+ œ-subsystems

2nd isomorphism: space-time dualities: Sp≈Tƒ

The system’s Space and Time components, which are also its Energy and Information, as Space is a fixed vision of the energy quanta that make a system, and information a still vision of time cycles that carry it in the frequency and form of those cycles.

So we identify the main elements and plane of existence of a system and consider its ‘gender varieties (lineal energy=male, cyclical information=female’ and Sp vs. Tƒ symmetries.

3rd Isomorphism: Its ages and evolution: Spe≤ST≥Tƒ

its 3±∆ ages in time…and its evolutionary ages in the ∆+1 plane of species.

4th Isomorphism: Its 4+∆ actions: ∆(æ-4; ï-3; e-2; œ-1; û+1)

Thus now we can easily describe its main 5 actions derived by those Dimensional components across its ∆±4 Fractal planes of existence: ∆æ-4 (acceleration of motion), ∆ï-3 (perception), ∆e-2 (feeding), ∆œ-1 (Repetition), ∆ §10≈û+1 (social union)¹.

5th Isomorphism: Its planes of Existence: ∆±4 Fractals

The ‘metric’, Scalar Space-time Generator equation which describes all its Space-time dimensions and isomorphic planes: ∆±4=SpxTƒ. And it allows to study its ∆-4, motion, ∆-3, information pixels, ∆-2, energy quanta, ∆-1 seminal seeds, §10≈û+1, social scales, ∆+1 super organism, ∆+2 world and that’s about it. We do not really care for its ∆+3 galaxy (-: and beyond.   And so now that we have it almost all said, we define the ∆ST structure of the being, with its specific generator equation in which the whole is represented, with all the previous data. This generator equation completes our understanding of the being.

6th Isomorphism: Organic cycles and social scalar classes: Ξ±3

Then we find its internal hierarchical social class structure and exchanges of energy and information among its ∆±1 ‘willing’ scales (the cellular/atomic ∆-1 plane, the individual and ∆+1, social/cosmic plane, where the being exists and which remains co-invariant through its inter-actions. So we analyze the closest world around it, through the perpendicularity and parallel laws of Non-Euclidean geometry’s ‘3rd postulate’ of similarity.

Creative diversification: 1,2,3

We show now the processes of creation and diversification of a given species. We study its gender dualities and its topological varieties caused by Sp,ST,Tƒ differentiation and the coding 4 numbers of its ‘∫æ,e,ï,œ≈û’ actions.

7th Isomorphism. Existential Constants: ∑S, ∏T, SxT, S/T, T/S, Œ∆±1, 5Å.

Next, we study the system quantitatively, through its Constants of Action, its Social Constants and its Space-time symmetries, all of them determined by the ratios of exchange of energy and information between its PSD elements. This is the most mathematical detailed analysis after the qualitative understanding of all the elements of the being.

8th isomorphism.MOTIons and worldcycle

the 3 ages of earth are: Gaia (life)> History (Man) > Metal-Earth (machines)

9th isomorphism. Social scales. §10

Finally we consider the last phase of its evolution which is social – for the most advances species, which transcend into a higher ∆- plane of existence through §10=(3×3+∆)¹° scales.

10th isomorphism:∆±1: finally we can describe the whole through the 10th isomorphism, ∆, where all the parts come together, the earth’s  consciousness which is gaia.

Alpha and omega, the 0 and 10th isomorphism: the point of the mind, site of the will, which orders the system internally in its ∑∆-1 parts and perceives it as an ∆-whole, part of its ∆+1 society. The topological center of a sphere, which can according to Poincare’s conjecture represent without deformation its whole world in the infinitesimal fractal, non-Euclidean mind point.

The ∆ST isomorphisms of the Earth.

1st isomorphism: Fractal Generator: Its 3 organic/networks: Spe≤≥ ST≤≥Tƒ

Topologic Isomorphism: Planets are molecular fields of gas, liquid & solid states:

-Max. Sp: A membrane of gas & magnetic belts isolate it.

– ∆Œ-1: The mantle’s magma defines the reproductive cycles of rocks.

-Max.Tƒ : The nucleus is an iron crystal apperceiving gravitation.

Each Non-Sp topology subdivides, according to the Fractal Principle that applies to all systems, in 3 smaller topologies. I.e.: Earth’s membrane has a Max. Sp-atmosphere, an e=O, liquid surface and a solid crust.

2nd isomorphism: space-time dualities: Sp≈Tƒ

The Galilean Px. refers to Earth: ‘e pur si muove’.

3rd Isomorphism: Its ages and evolution: Spe≤ST≥Tƒ

Planets are born as ∑∆-1 nebulae that cool down into rocks, collapsed in a hot, max. Sp-Age, cooling down into liquid magma & water evaporated as they fall inwards, as a naked solid into the star that swallows them into an explosive death.

Its membrane also goes through 3 Ages, the 3 Earths, studied in detail in

Planets are born as ∑∆-1 nebulae that cool down into rocks, collapsed in a hot, max. Sp-Age, cooling down into liquid magma & water evaporated as they fall inwards, as a naked solid into the star that swallows them into an explosive death.

Its membrane also goes through 3 Ages, the 3 Earths, studied in detail in the 8th isomorphism.

4th Isomorphism: Its planes of Existence: ∆±4 Fractals

We are the ∆-1 ‘cellular points’ of the Earth’s membrane, a living super organism, Gaia, evolving now from its present Anthropocene age into the Mechanocene.

5th Isomorphism: Its 5 actions : ∆(æ-4; ï-3; e-2; œ-1; û+1)

∆ï-3: Planets have core crystals; Œ-points, which absorb gravitons as information.

∆e-2: Those gravitational strings trigger Uranium and Co-Ni-Fe fission reactions, heating its nucleus

∆œ-1: Which provoke the inner, reproductive cycle of rocks in the mantle. While externally planets are reproduced ‘enzymatically’ by their stars’ gravitational pull that is also…

10: The origin of their ‘parallel’ herding in planetary vortices that follow 5D metric (3rdKepler law).
∏ But network evolution on planets happens in its ‘ectoderm’, the membrane that evolves ¥-light informative mammals, humans & machines (chips) creating a planetary mind. Origin of its 3 ages.

6th Isomorphism: Social classes: Ξ±3

As usual the topological form defines the social scales of the Earth.

Thus we define Earth as ‘an organic, molecular system with a central crystal, which acts as a knot of informative flows of gravitation and a hard membrane that evolves light based, life ecosystems.’

The surface and the center are its informative Oo Œ-point. The intermediate topological cycles of rock are its body. The energetic fields of the electromagnetic sun its energy class.

7th Isomorphism. Existential Constants: ∑S, ∏T, SxT, S/T, T/S, Œ∆±1, 5Å.

Geology and astrophysics studies the constants of the Earth, all with much slower cycles according to the Sp size of the ∆ST metric co-invariance.

8th isomorphism. Creative diversification: 1,2,3,4.

 

The Earth is a super-organism, as the Scottish father of geology did define ‘her’. As such it has evolved in ‘3 ages’, diversifying its inner rocks and its outer informative Tƒ-membrane life forms:

Max. Sp: a young, hot I Earth of anaerobic bacteria.

Sp≈Tƒ: liquid. a II Earth of aerobic bacteria, Gaia that evolves carbon-life till creating History, the Super Organism of Mankind.

Max.Tƒ: III Earth of memes of metal |-weapons, O-money & machines, organisms that ‘enzymen’ build transferring their biological in/form/ation into metal in 3 Ages

9th isomorphism. Social scales. §10

Earth was formed by a series of planetoid collision in increasing social scales, from a planar topology (asteroid ring), till the formation of a solid informative core that coalesced the whole Systems:

10th isomorphism: Self: Œ-Point x ∞ World = Constant mind Mapping

 

Earth’s life absorbs ¥-light as energy (plants) or Information (animals). By similarity small cosmic bodies, bosonic quark stars (black holes & pulsars) and gravitomagnetic iron crystals in planets’ cores should process gravitation, the force of the cosmic scale, as information; while stars are ‘big’ Plants in the cosmic order that absorb gravitation as energy in their galactic orbitals.

 

3RD ISOMORPHISM: THE 3 AGES OF THE EARTH.

The Geological Age. image081image082

 the isomorphism of 3 ages, applied to the Tƒ- External membrane of the Earth (cycle of creation and destruction of continents). They are 2 of the many examples of properties, structures and events of the Earth – all of them encased within the template of fractal space-time super organisms and its 10 isomorphic set of ‘∆ST symmetric laws’.

 

The Earth as a ternary, topological st-point.

A planet is a huge i-logic molecular field that mixes liquid and solid states with a very thin gaseous membrane. Thus, based in our template of a network organism, we define the Earth as a st-point:

The Earth is an organic, molecular system with a central crystal, which acts as a knot of informative flows of gravitation and a hard membrane that evolves life ecosystems, based on light’.

In the left side of the graph The Earth as a st-point, has 3 fundamental non-AE regions:

– Max. Sp: Our planet has an energetic, gaseous external membrane; the atmosphere and magnetic belts, which isolates it and selects the type of radiation that crosses into its surface.

– Sp X Tƒ: The zone of maximal reproductive and organic evolution is the crust and mantle: On the surface of the planet there are animal herds that communicate and act-react to light impulses, evolving and reproducing its form. Next, a crust and mantle layer of magma defines the reproductive cycles of rocks.

– Max. Tƒ: The inner, informative nucleus is a dense crystal core of iron and within it probably there is a smaller Uranium core, the most complex atom of the Universe with a minimal stable life.

Each of those 3 Non-E regions can be subdivided again, according to the Fractal Principle, in ternary structures and sub-scales of ‘fractal quanta’ that interact between them with different Sp<=>Tƒ, cyclical rhythms corresponding to their arrows of time.

Yet if the Earth has a ternary structure in space, it means its 3 st-regions also perform the 3±∆ existential cycles of any organic system. This is certain to the extent we have empirical evidence for the membrane and the intermediate region with its cycles of reproduction of rocks and so we extend that ‘probability’ to the central core, a crystal of ‘magnetic iron’, which should behave as any magnetic, crystalline structure of atoms does, enacting parallel cycles to those of crystals…

Let us then study 2 of those topological regions in more detail, escaping the external, atmospheric membrane. We shall do so as an ‘exercise’ of the Ternary Principle, showing how any system can be divided in subsystems, which have also a ternary topology that can be subdivided ad infinitum. Since this topological, fractal method that can be applied to all systems, coupled with the ternary division of all events and processes in 3 ages that determine finally the evolution of microforms into a higher organic plane of existence through the arrows of eusocial and organic evolution, (demonstrated in our previous description of the ages of the big-bang and its physical particles) is the essential mode of description of any entity of the Universe with multiple space-times theory…

Recap. The Earth is a topological st-point, which can be subdivided further according to the ternary principle in sub-topologies. The Earth crust is part of the intermediary, reproductive, cyclical region, in which physical cycles and life cycles take place. It has also a ternary topology and climatic cycles that forced the evolution of life.

The intermediate, reproductive region.

According to the ternary principle the intermediate, reproductive region (crust and mantle) can be subdivided in 3 subzones that correspond to the 3 topologies of a st-point, albeit with a different order to that of a full, closed ball organism: An external informative surface filled with evolving, ‘high’, informative, fractal beings, called humans; an energetic, strong continental crust that feed us and a liquid, reproductive magma that renew the crust and dominates by volume and size the other two.

The informative, living quanta of CNO organisms.

– The highly mobile, informative quanta that inhabits the Earth crust can be also divided by the ternary principle in a series of fractal super-organisms of hyperbolic, informative brains (animal life) that control their reproductive body and feed on vital spaces, called ecosystems themselves divided in smaller fractal, vital territories in which those living beings accomplish their time arrows of feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially, through a series of cyclical motions, which are non-AE trajectories traced in their vital space by those animal organisms.

Again the ternary principle allows to study each of those vital territories as topological st-points, open balls with an ‘invisible membrane’ and a hyperbolic swarm of self-similar, fractal informative beings, the animal herd, family or human tribe of a nation, which is also a topological st-fractal territory.

The fractal beings that live in those spacetimes, in fact bidimensional planes, from its diminutive perspective, draw up parallel curves in its trajectories, called geodesics, within the geographic, invisible limits of those territories, to fulfill their cycles/arrows of temporal existence. For example, herds do not cross its hunting fields; countries establish geographically invisible but very real borders, difficult to cross, patrolled by Entropy armies, with informative center called capitals where they accumulate most of the monetary, legal and audio-visual information of the nation.

Yet on the Earth a curious event is taking place: an inversion of space-time fields. Since the membrane is becoming the dominant informative region of the planet, evolving through herds of animal beings and machines that perceive light as information and are developing a complex global society, a super-organism with a new ‘informative’ audio-visual network that circulates through its satellites. All those systems, which belong to the sociological sciences can be studied with the isomorphisms of complex st-points.

Since we shall study the outer membrane in far more detail when considering the evolution of human life, let us consider now in this geological analysis, the other 2 regions.

Max. Sp: The continental crust.

The external crust of the Earth is a hard, energetic membrane of silicates and rocks that isolates the planet. Each continent can be studied as an open ball topology with the 3 canonical topologies:

– An ‘invisible’ border, the continental platform, which sustains most of the organic life of the Earth.

– A reproductive region, the river plains, where most life exists and reproduces.

– And a perpendicular positive or negative height axis, of fractal, hyperbolic topology where evolution of life often happens: the dorsal ranges of Andes in America, where the first Amerindian civilizations took place; the Himalayans, where the mongoloid race mutated; the African Rift (negative, hyperbolic topology, where the ape evolved into human being); and the line that goes from to the Alps in Eurasia to the Balkans (where the iron civilizations that would dominate Europe were born – La Tene, Hallstat, etc.)

Indeed, we can observe on the Earth how the larger cycles of the biggest geological structures of the planet and the sun-earth system determine and synchronize the faster rhythms of its smallest species, both in the physical systems of solid rocks, liquid water and atmospheric gases and in the organic systems of life. For example, the cycles of ‘Entropy’ vs. ‘information’ of the planet (glaciation cycles) are the key cycles to determine the reproductive radiations in hot ages and informative evolution, in cold ages of its species; the 800 years cycles of climatic changes determined the 800 years cycles of life and death of civilizations and so on.

So we might wonder if the Earth’s structures are a program of evolution of life? The answer is more impersonal: macro-organisms automatically provoke the evolution of micro-organisms by chances in their informative and energetic fields that raise the stakes of survival of its micro-particles, which are forced to ‘evolve’.

In the graph, the geological record shows one of those cycles, chained to the cycles of its fractal scales, rocks and living beings, the continental cycle that fusions and breaks them in 3 parts every 500-700 million years, a fact which had deep implications to the evolution of life: The outer membrane of the Earth undergoes geological cycles of creation and destruction of continents, modulated by the periodic beat of the Earth, which every ±250 million years emits matter from its nucleus, creating new submarine ranges and lavas that surface across the extension of an entire continent.

Thus again, the ‘invisible’ center of a st-point regulates its surface. Moreover, the cycle controls the ∆-1 microscopic scale of life beings, provoking catastrophes that cause great extinction periods, due to massive changes in volcanic activity and the shape of continental platforms, where most life forms exist. In that regard the 2 biggest extinctions of life forms happened tuned to the cycle, 250 million years (Permian extinction) and 500 million years ago (Cambrian extinction). Classic geology postulates that a single continent breaks in 3 parts every 500-700 million years and then lava, coming out of the Atlantic central range, provokes the movement of those continents that join back in the other extreme, sinking matter on its path. So the overall crust doesn’t grow.

On the other hand, the organic theory considers the Earth’s nuclei a ferromagnetic system that might absorb gravitational waves of dark Entropy from the black hole-sun system which will catalyze an iron-cobalt-nickel reaction, adding quarks to the iron nucleus that seems to ‘absorb’ gravitational forces. Thus if the iron crystal of the Earth slows down those waves and ‘coils’ them into cyclical mass, Sp=Mc2, provoking heat radiation or new quarks, the nucleus of the Earth would grow.

As in all ‘invisible’ gravitational processes, we don’t have enough data to prove either hypothesis: a growing Earth or a steady state planet. Yet the Earth’s oceanic crust shows an imbalance between subduction zones and the excessive number of lava rivers, ranges and abyssal dips, which stretch the Earth’s skin as it happens in a fat man. The Atlantic vomits enormous quantities of lava that move America away, continuously, creating the Andes range, which in turn should move away the Pacific, creating a range in the Chinese coast.

Yet on the East side of the Pacific instead of finding a huge range or trench from Indonesia to Japan, we find some discontinuous subduction zones with intermittent mega thrust earthquakes that seem not enough to balance that growth with its crust destruction. Thus, planets might grow and fluctuate in size, chained to the time cycles of stars, which seem to be chained to the cycles of the organic galaxy and its Worm Hole, according to the synchronic chains between the time arrows/cycles of all the parts of an organic system.

S=T. Dominant reproductive region: the mantle.

Let us illustrate other isomorphisms of multiple space-times with the mantle:

-Any subsystem that acts as an energetic, informative or reproductive subsystem of its higher scale will be dominant in that function in its internal, ternary structure:

The deeper layer the intermediate region of the planet is the mantle, made of liquid magma that flows in cyclical, convection streams, reproducing and renewing the rocks of the crust’s membrane. Because we are studying a region that in the higher ‘plane of existence’ of the planet as a whole performs a reproductive function, its reproductive subzone is the biggest one. If the system was an energetic system within the whole, as the atmosphere is the biggest region would be the most energetic (the Ionosphere and exosphere filled with cosmic rays.)

And if the system was an informative one, such as a computer or the center of the planet, we expect the informative zone (the mother-board, the iron crystal of the planetary core, to be dominant). Facts, which apply also to biological systems (so for example, man, an informative species, has on top the brain and is dominated by the height dimension of information; while a planarian worm, a simple digestive, energetic system is a ‘plane’ of biological Entropy).

-Hierarchical structure: All systems have 3±∆ main hierarchical planes, or scales in which the properties of the parts transfer to the whole. So happens to the Earth’s geological Sp X Tƒ cycles, in which the activities of its quanta become units of larger cycles, as the reproduced substances keep enlarging the ‘energetic membrane’ (earth crust):

– ∆-1: At fractal level the geological Earth can be considered an aggregate of all kind of molecular fields called grains and rocks, which show also a st-ternary structure. For example, the commonest rocks are basalts, which show 3 st-differentiated zones: feldspar (energetic rock with minimal symmetry), mica (balanced S=T form) and quartz (the informative element with symmetric crystalline properties) that create together by social evolution, the basalt (∆+1). And its process and cycles are process of constant growth of its social form, basalt which forms the overwhelming surface of Oceans, the 70% of the Earth crust.

– st: The next organic scale are small formations made of grain or bigger ones made of rocks. And those geological structures, from mountains to glaciers to sand deserts are constantly growing and reproducing new ‘fractal forms’. And all of them the same 3 zoned st-regions that structure the planet with an informative nucleus, reproductive bodies and external Entropy.

I will put a poetic example: the dune is an organic sand system made of grains, which despite its simplicity already shows the organic properties and ternary structure of any st-point. The dune is an open ball without a clear external membrane and so it is open to constant exchanges of Entropy and form with the environment, which makes it extremely dynamic, as all open balls, like the black holes we just studied are. So the dune constantly moves through the energetic cycles of its body quanta, which constantly reproduces its structure adding new sand grains.

The dune is a simple body made of unconnected herds of cellular grains. But even so, those sand quanta extract Entropy from the wind, moving the dune without losing its form, and absorb information from the pressure of its weight that compacts the molecules of the dune, while temperature’s changes help the sand to crystallize. So the dune is a simple organic system from the point of view of fractal space-time. But where it is the brain of the dune, its center of perception? An Islamic poet, who lives with dunes in the sand world will tell you that the dune has a soul called the rose of the desert, because all dunes have in its center a quartz crystal that grows slowly to the rhythms of the dunes’ daily cycles of Entropy and information, reflecting the movements of its sand’s body on the radial informative networks of the crystal, which record as all informative systems the paths of the dune in the memorial traces of its planes. So recently, thanks to the memories of zircons, we found that the Earth cooled down faster than energetic science believed as the dominant, cold informative arrow of all systems imposed itself.

Let us now put a gaseous example of another Earth’s organic system from the atmosphere: the hurricane is a spiral vortex with a quiet center. Scientists have noted that when the hurricane creates the central point, its form becomes stable, and inversely when they ‘kill’ its informative eye, the hurricane breaks. It is that eye perhaps a knot of electro-magnetic or gravitational information that regulates the streams of gas that surround it? Those Aristotelian centers of informative, gravitational, simple geological perception might form central, geometrical images we cannot decode. But they behave externally as if they were centers of informative order that regulate their shapes, creating order in the geological Earth. And the fractal sum of all those informative knots together, even if physicists cannot easily measured balances the whole Earth maintaining its awesome number of beautiful forms; since beauty indeed has also a simple equation that defines it: S=T, balance between Entropy and form.

– ∆+1: Thus the intermediate layer of the planet is its reproductive zone, occupying its canonical position in the Earth’s st-point between the crust and the central singularity, where we observe a series of cycles of reproduction and destruction of rocks that create the complex geological structures of its surface, which can be studied according to the isomorphisms of multiple space-times with its spatial and temporal perspective, and as a system extending in 3 hierarchical scales of fractal quanta, parts of wholes, units of the entire cyclical system. And the biggest of those geological fields is the Earth itself, which as we have seen displays the 3 st-zones of a spatial system, with a central, iron, informative, crystalline core, an intermediate cyclical, liquid, ‘reproductive’ zone that creates rocks and crystals and a hard, structural external crust-membrane. And so even if we cannot perceive it, we postulate by homology with all other st-points and intermediate regions that the mantle will also create iron crystals that will fall to the center of the Earth and become added to the crystal core

The 3 ages of rocks and crystals.

image085

 If we study those geological forms in time all of them go also through the 3 ‘states-ages’ of matter that shape the long geological cycles of the inner and outer regions of the mantle, which often culminate in the creation of crystals, the 3rd most perfect, informative, molecular age.

The generational, life cycle of those geological rocks is very slow compared to our life rhythms, according to the space-time inversion, max. Sp=Min. Tƒ; since they are made of heavier atoms and bigger networks than life beings. So they have life spans of millions of years with minimal, informative, time speed; hence they seem dead species from the faster point of view of humans made of lighter atoms. But they just live in fact much longer than we do.

We thought plants did not perceive or acted-reacted to external stimuli, because they were big and slow life based in chemical languages (max.Sp=Min. Tƒ), compared to the faster, electronic languages of smaller animals (Max. Tƒ=min.Sp). But plants turn to the sun, grow adapted to winds and seem to do it faster with music. So their leaves might be simple ears that transmit the vibrations of sounds to their chemical, root brains. The cycles of rocks are even slower, but still they are organic systems of Entropy and information.

I-logic geometry studies them through the key physical parameter of Entropy and information, which is temperature: high temperature means high Entropy, low temperature means high order-information. Another important parameter is ‘height’, which is a dimension of information. Finally, most processes of creation are long as time, information and evolution are related: a fast process of creation takes place at high temperatures with maximal expenditure of Entropy and Min.Informative order (max. Sp=Min. Tƒ). While the inverse slow process of creation uses less Entropy and reaches a maximal final order. If we apply those 3 st- isomorphisms, we can understand the processes of crystal and rock’s creation and its 3±∆ ages:

Birth and Youth: Rocks are born as lavas inside the planet with a high temperature (Entropy-movement) and an extended form. As they rise in the dimension of height-information, rocks cool off, losing temperature-Entropy and acquiring form, till reaching when the process is very slow (with a higher quantity of evolutionary time), a crystalline form, able to create images within its informative focus. But if the cooling of the rock happens too fast, without giving time to the slow, formal evolution of atoms necessary to acquire a symmetric order, it becomes an amorphous rock. Finally, the rock or crystal comes out to the surface of the Earth and its youth cycle of creation ends.

Maturity: In its mature age the crystal perceives light, forming images in its focus, while the amorphous rock shows at best strikes of lineal atoms. As informative species, crystals also live longer in time, as neurons do in our brain; women in our gender duality and black holes in the Universe. Diamonds live billions of years. But amorphous rocks soon begin the aging process, through erosion that wears them away by the effect of water and light.

3rd Age and Death that gives life. We find in rocks, as in all exi=stential cycles, 2 forms of death:

– Max. Se=Min. Tƒ: An explosive, sudden death, common to all crystals that become broken, exploding into pieces with brisk changes of temperature.

– Max. Tƒ=min. Se: An informative death in their 3rd age, common to amorphous rocks, as they wear away very slowly, eroded by water and air. So when a rock dies its cells disintegrate, loose its height and return to the interior of the Earth, completing its generational cycle. Then, the Entropy of the Earth’s heart will warm them up again into magma, starting a new cycle:

Se<=>Tƒ symmetry between 3±∆ ages and 3±∆ spatial types of rocks.

Finally, if we consider those ages in space they give birth to 3±∆ equivalent types of rocks:

– Max. Sp: Simples volcanic rocks that flow with max. Entropy and speed towards the surface of the Earth but have minimal form.

– <=>:Igneous rocks have slower rising speeds and a balanced form.

– Max. Tƒ: Metamorphic rocks, as their name shows, undergo a transformation with several degrees of crystalline form and radial symmetry. They are the slowest to come out to the surface.

±∆: Finally, when rocks die and disaggregate into dust, they clamp into the 4th type of rocks: sedimentary rocks and sand, which still have minimal organic structure.

The main difference between the organic and inorganic Earth is its location and speed of cycles: The organic Earth inhabits the final layer of the solid magma in a transitional zone of interaction among gas, liquid and solid molecules. Yet both molecular systems undergo long geological cycles. The best known of those cycles is the cycle of the energetic molecule of life, H20, water, that goes through a gas state as a cloud, a liquid age as moving rain and a solid phase as ice or as the most perfect crystalline form, snow, which lasts longer than ice into the ground, as information systems do.

So, the biggest liquid and solid systems of the Earth’s crust – the sea, the sand of the deserts and rocks of its mountains – are just organic, fractal systems with very slow existential cycles. Similar cycles occur with the organic masses of the other 2 main atoms of life, nitrogen, the informative atom of life and carbon, the Sp=T balanced ‘body’ of living systems.

Thus the surface of planet Earth, Gaia, is a living, organic, membrane, a complex molecular system, made at macro-scale of multiple life ecosystems, composed at our human scale of living organisms, which are themselves made at fractal micro-scale of carbon-molecules with forms self-similar to the crystalline molecules, of the previous graph. Those 3 scales structure the cycles of existence of life interacting among them – as it happens in any other ‘i-logic world’, from the mantle and its crystalline rocks just described to the Universe as a whole.

Recap. The fractal, ternary principle subdivides each region of the Earth in 3 sub regions with the same ternary topologies, ad infinitum, allowing us a more detailed analysis of all systems. Thus, the intermediate, reproductive region of the Earth can be subdivided in 3 sub regions – the surface where life exists, the continental crust that follows an Sp<=>tƒ cycle of creation and destruction of a super-continent into 3 fractal zones and the mantle, where rocks follow their cycles of creation and destruction.

The central core of planets and its crystal minds.

629

Earth, as an st-point, has a central singularity and an external membrane that form a unified structure that controls the fractal, reproductive intermediate zone: the activity of the Earth’s inner core defines the reproductive and existential cycles of the magma rocks, which shape the continental crust membrane of the planet:

Let us finish this introduction to complex physics and its ternary sciences, quantum physics, which studies the smallest particles; astronomy, which studies its gravitational bodies and geology, which studies the intermediate planetary world, with the analysis of that core that connects us back to the relative infinity of the galaxy.

The center has also 3 zones; an informative crystal of iron, which might perceive gravitation a reproductive external liquid ball that should reproduce and precipitate those iron crystals and a center of radioactive uranium that acts as its energetic, heating nuclear plant.

Sp X Tƒ: Liquid iron.

One of the tenants of multiple space-times theory is the multi-functionality of each topological structure, which often plays through its 3 sub-regions different functions for the whole organism. For example in the core of the planet we first find is a dense layer of liquid iron that should reproduce the crystals of the core. Yet it also has an informative role, as it creates convection streams, responsible for the creation of the strong magnetic field of the outer atmosphere of the Earth, forming the classic Max. Sp x Max. Tƒ, ‘a-r’ duality of a topological, closed ball that cages the reproductive ‘cells’ of its body, within it – in this case the other structures of the mantle:

So life will die exposed to radiation beyond the membrane and rocks will die melted by the liquid iron. In non-Euclidean structures, according to Klein a region that cannot be reached is a relative infinity. So those regions are the relative infinite of our existence and that of the rocks of the mantle, as the black hole is the relative infinite of the light that redshifts without ever reaching it as light.

Finally liquid iron becomes the energetic, hotter lower membrane for the rocks of the mantle, fuelling its reproductive cycles.

Max. Sp: Uranium core.

The next region of the core is an iron crystal and in the very same center of that iron crystal, within it, there is probably a smaller core of uranium, the most energetic atom of the Universe, with a minimal stable life that emits heat, and sustains with its weight and pressure radiation the crystal core.

Max. Tƒ: Iron Crystals

Indeed, the Earth seems to have on its center, surrounded by flows of liquid magma, a crystal made of iron, the most efficient structural atom able to move in gravitational fields, as iron magnets show. Thus, as ‘evolved’ crystal systems in cameras perceive electromagnetic waves, the center of the Earth probably perceives the gravitational waves that structure solar systems and galaxies.

Yet the crystal core has also according to the ternary principle an energetic and reproductive cycle related to the Uranium core, which becomes in this manner its symbiotic, small body.

And all those cycles according to the hierarchical and multifunctional principles are synchronized with the smaller cycles of existence of its surface quanta – the cycles of life and creation and destruction of continents; and with the bigger cycles of stars and galaxies, of which the planet is in itself a fractal quantum.

Let us consider those functions and propositions in more detail.

Reproduction of matter and absorption of heat Entropy.

Those st-reproductive and energetic functions of the core are based in a well-founded empirical fact:

The Earth’s nucleus is composed of nickel, iron and a probable inner core of uranium, which form together a nuclear reaction chain based on the absorption of nucleons: uranium absorbs a neutron and emits helium, which iron absorbs to create cobalt that emits a neutron to become nickel. The neutron can be absorbed by uranium and feed again the cycle. Those reactions at planetary scale can provoke an enormous quantity of Entropy and matter that should be responsible for the periodic activity of its magma, which peaks every ±125 million years, determining the geological continental cycle and the changes on the magnetic field of the Earth.

Yet the sun has an orbital period around the galaxy of +200 million years. So those peaks of nuclear and magma activity coincide with the equinox of the solar orbit. What happens in those points? Does the sun cross a turbulent spatial region or a galactic discontinuity? It is the orbital cycle of the sun chained to periods of Worm Hole gravitational activity, as the orbit of Jupiter coincides with the suns’ spot cycle? Then G-waves might become flows of gravitational Entropy that enter through the planetary axis, as magnetic flows do in atoms, and trigger the uranium->nickel reaction, causing the discontinuous cycles of magma activity in the intermediate ‘reproductive’ zone of the Earth, responsible of the geological, biological and magnetic catastrophic changes on the planet. We know very little but the few things we know seem to prove the interrelating nature of all parts and scales of the galaxy.

Further on, the Earth and other planets fluctuate in their diameter during their rotational orbit as they use gravitational Entropy to move, ‘deforming’ in the abstract jargon of Einstein, space-time into a curved orbital path.

Thus, planets should grow periodically in size, emitting not only radiation but also matter from those inner cores, a fact that finds constantly new proofs. Since planets emit more radiation and have stronger magnetic fields than we can calculate with mechanic models. While planets closer to the Sun, like Venus that should absorb stronger G-energies, mutate its skin every ±400 million years, creating an entire new crust, as a snake does when it grows and changes its skin. Yet ultimately as in all ‘cosmological farms’, those planets will end up falling and feeding the sun. So all those ‘physical cycles’ show that planets absorb Entropy and information and grow in orbital size with rhythms similar to those of nucleons and electrons, when they absorb Entropy.

The heart and brain of the planet.

Metals use electronic flows to communicate information and Entropy, organizing their networks through crystalline forms. Their pixels are not photons but electrons. Most of those crystals have also the dominant cubic form, better suited to a 4-dimensional Universe. Thus crystals organize, trans-form and perceive information in the 2 main atomic families we know: the light atoms and the electronic worlds of metal: Electrons in the world of metallic, crystals either form static clouds of ‘informative images’ or flows that travel through huge metallic networks, stabilizing their structure.

There might be also in the radioactive family, under extreme pressure, crystal-like formal structures crossed by neutronic flows, its Sp X Tƒ communicative particles, creating ‘radioactive networks’, as crystals form crystalline networks, which might invaginate the entire planet. Those fluid ‘veins’ of radioactive Entropy should then control in more detail the flows of the rest of the ‘planetary organism’. All those homologies are very likely to happen in our planets, as all st-points turn out to be far more complex and organic in detailed analysis that mechanist, energetic scientists will ever believe from their anthropomorphic point of view.

Thus like our organisms, regulated by two networks of reproductive Entropy (blood) and information, the dual body/brain of uranium/iron at the center of the planet might be just a heart/brain dual system with complex radial networks whose cycles of creation of Entropy and form determine to its finest detail even the surface, as we have seen in our analysis of continental and glaciation cycles; which could be also connected to the changes in the magnetic activity of stars. It is in fact possible to construct a model of absolute determinism in which all the parts of the planet are interrelated and all the parts of the galaxy are organically connected, even if we will never perceive 97% of the matter and Entropy of the galaxy and a self-similar quantity of our planet structure.

Perceptive, informative function of the Earth Nucleus.

As we change scales from micro-atoms to macro-atoms, the spatial size of the crystals also change in the same way that a machine that substitutes a human organ changes in scale (so a crane that substitutes an arm is far bigger and stronger). And so celestial bodies have in their core crystals of planetary scale, which should be the informative center that regulates most of the long Sp X Tƒ cycles of the planet. While the size of the ‘electromagnetic waves’ those celestial bodies use as Entropy also change from electromagnetic microwaves to gravitational macro-waves.

Yet all the processes described for transparent light crystals work for electronic iron crystals, since a crystal is a i-logic symmetric, fractal geometry that can be adapted to any form. We conclude that iron crystals might see ‘electrons’ and feed or move under gravitational waves, which could be their ‘energetic’ substance.

The 3 ages of planets

All this details said, when we grow up back to the ∆+1 structure of the whole planet, it should be obvious that planets as a whole also obey all the previous isomorphisms.

The most important is the law of the 3 ages. And so planets go through the same living ages of other cosmological species. They are born as nebulae that cool down into a rock, and then they start to cycle around the sun in a symbiotic structure: the planet moves deforming the static field of gravitational space-time around the sun and absorbs discontinuous transversal G-waves, which uses to ‘control’ its spin, stabilize its orbital territory around the star, feed and perceive perhaps as far as the central Worm Hole of the galaxy, origin of most of those waves.

Recap. The planetary core is a ternary region with a liquid, reproductive surface that precipitates crystals, which form a solid, informative iron crystal, perceive of transversal gravitational waves. Finally inside the crystal there is an Uranium core, the body of the crystal, whose radiation cycles reproduce mass and provide heat, regulating the cycles of the rest of the structures of the planet, including our rhythms of evolution. Thus the planet have a mechanical, conscious or vegetative gravitational mind, connected to the cycles of stars and galactic black holes, which will ultimate feed on it? We leave that final decision to your imagination.

Philosophical coda.

The skeptic reader might think those are speculations we won’t ever prove. Still the main epistemological teaching of i-logic geometry is that ‘topological homology’ is a valid form of knowledge and the only way we have to study most of the Universe, given the fact we can at best perceive only 4% of that Universe. So when we confront that 96% of the gravitational reality we will never perceive – all what there is within a planet beyond its thin membrane or within the Universe beyond its light-space, or within an atom beyond its thin electronic membrane, the only practical method of knowledge is homology, as the same topologies and ages of space and time happen in all species, by the mere fact that we are all made of the two primary shapes/motions of reality, Entropy and information.

Ultimately the only reason mechanist science does not accept such hypothesis is the arrogant anthropomorphic desires of human beings for absolute truth. Yet since the ultimate, existential goal of any form of knowledge is to avoid death and dangers cannot be known with total certainty, any species believes probable truths based in their homology with past cycles of existence. So a gazelle doesn’t know if a lion will kill her, but based in the homology with previous cycles she runs, accepting that probable truth. Truth is indeed ultimately limited by our perception, which is never absolute, so truth is never absolute. I have merely tried to show you the most probable truths of the interconnected organic Universe in which you are also a mere point of existence that now we shall study with more detail with the same isomorphisms we have studied to describe all other realities, in your 3 scales, at cellular, individual and social level, with the sciences of biology and bio-history.

Recap. You are nothing but dust of space-time as everything else in the Universe, submitted to the same organic isomorphisms of Entropy and information that regulates all exi=stential beings.

 THE 3 AGES OF GAIA

777

The 3±∆ ages of life are caused by the evolution of light-based organs on Earth. In the graph, those 3 ages of light evolution and the main species that were created in each horizon, latter extinguished by new evolutionary improvements in the 3 networks of those organisms. Among plants – spatial, reproductive beings with minimal speed of evolutionary information – extinctions were caused by improvements in reproductive systems. Among animals, which are informative, evolutionary species, extinctions were caused by improvements in informative brains. While today a mass extinction of living beings is caused by the evolution of machines, metal-systems of ‘—motions’ and information that are shaping a new global ecosystem: the Financial-Military-Industrial Complex, becoming now integrated by the collective brain of machines – the Internet – into the Metal-Earth.

3±∆ ages of evolution, reproduction & extinction of species

We can understand the process of evolution and extinction of life species, only when we combine the 3 scales in which multicellular organisms exist: the ecosystemic, planetary scale, (∆+1) the organic scale (st), and the cellular scale (∆-1) that interacted simultaneously together, evolving Earth’s species. Yet contrary to belief, the 3 relative ∆-1 past, st-present and st-future planes were not determined by the cellular evolution of Genes, but first the macro-organism of the Earth provoked the changes that ignited the process of evolution of its relative past microcosms.

How a macro-organism regulates its microorganisms? Mainly through changes on its ‘—motions’ and information fields. All cellular species adapt to the organic networks of its environment. If the environment is rich in ‘—motions’, ‘—motions’ species and reproductive radiations will dominate. If the organic system or environment is rich in information, informative species will survive better, starting a process of evolutionary differentiation.

This duality of bio-chemical reactions was proved mathematically by Mehaute, which showed that when a system cannot continue its creation of ‘—motions’, it starts a process of fractal, informative reproduction; and we can extend it to all scales of systems of reality, creating the fundamental beat of biological evolution/reproduction, e<=>Tƒ, that defined the creation of biological life in this planet.

Thus the changes of ‘—motions’ and information of any macro-organic system trigger processes of extinction and selective evolution. If suddenly the climate becomes cold (also a parameter of stillness and information), species tend to limit their absorption of ‘—motions’, evolving formally (Max. Tƒ) and organizing themselves into social networks that increase their efficiency and take advantage of the ‘informative conditions’ of the ecosystem.

On the contrary, if ‘—motions’ abounds, species increase their 2 dimensions=arrows of spatial ‘—motions’ – their spatial size and their reproduction – using that ‘—motions’ to maximize their survival and saturate their ecosystem. Therefore the macroscopic changes of the planet that fluctuates between tropical ages of max. ‘—motions’ and ice ages of Max.Information cause parallel changes in their microscopic life beings. Since coldness=stillness=information and evolution are parameters of time; while heat=‘—motions’=movement and reproduction are dimensions and parameters of space.

When the planet cools there is a formal evolution of species. And when it heats up, those same species reproduce massively. Thus small fluctuations of ‘—motions’ and information on the Earth’s temperature – given the short limits of existence of liquid water between and 100 degrees – have influenced decisively the evolution, reproduction and extinction of life forms in this planet, including man. So during the long ice ages when waters froze, species evolved from eukaryote to multi-cellular beings, nearby water volcanoes; and when the surface of the planet froze, men evolved from Homo Erectus to Homo sapiens. While in hot ages species grew in spatial size and multiplied, as it happened in the Carboniferous with insects; or in the Jurassic with dinosaurs; or in history with nomadic, warrior tribes in the steppes – which descended rhythmically every ±800 years on the fertile plains, extinguishing with their new weapons all the civilizations of the Eurasian continent….

Yet because to reproduce, a species needs to feed on the ‘—motions’ of its victims, the reproductive phase of a new top predator species coincides with the extinctive phase of the previous top predator it has substituted. Then once the top predator establishes itself after a reproductive radiation, it enters its mature, steady state age, drawing a series of rhythmic bell curves with its preys that diminish its populations as the predator hunts them, provoking a hunger crisis on the predator that also dies away, allowing the preys to reproduced back, starting again a new ‘Volterra cycle’.

So we can consider a planetary cycle of evolution, reproduction and extinction of life with 3±∆ phases, parallel to the climatic changes of the Earth:

+st: Conception: A new species evolves in a cold age or in an abyssal region of the planet.

– Youth: Max. ‘—motions’ growth: The species increases its size after its conception.

-S=T:Maturity: The species reproduces in a biological radiation during a hot age, extinguishing the previous top predator.

– Max. Tƒ: The species diversifies according to the ternary principle into several new forms, among which the informative one might start a process of social evolution into:

– ∆+1, a social super-organism (ants and shrews in the lower scales of life-size; humans in the upper scale.)

– ∆-1: Or become extinguished by new species, often their son species (Oedipus paradox). So mammals extinguished dinosaurs; humans extinguish mammals and robots might extinguish humans.

Therefore Multiple Space-time Theory can explain the why of one of the great ‘disputed’ enigmas of evolution: the existence of evolutionary discontinuities that create species in very short periods (conception phase, when time accelerates its rate of informative change), and then multiply them throughout the planet in explosive radiations (reproductive phase, when the new top predator species explode in populations), while other species become extinguished also in brief periods. Those evolutionary ‘discontinuities’ merely reflect the previous ages of species, which as the ages of any other space-time field can be described with a ternary rhythm of explosive birth, a long steady state of balance between the predator species and its preys and a final sudden collapse and extinction of populations. Those phases become the fractal rhythms of existence and extinction of Earth’s species:

Max. evolution(cold age)Max.reproduction + Max.extinction of ‘—motions’ preys (hot age)

The discontinuities between species are easy to explain if we combine their evolutionary acceleration in time – similar to the palingenesis of a fetus – with the fact that species evolve in isolated, protected environments (allopatric differentiation), departing from small sizes, according to the Black Hole paradox. So monkeys evolved, protected in trees; marsupials evolved in Australian islands and robots evolve in secret military labs, departing from small chips.

Then suddenly the new form with an improved brain, hunting in herds with simultaneous fractal åctions of higher ST Force, invades the vital space of other species, extinguishing them as it reproduces geometrically its populations (and its fossils), till reaching a balance with its preys. Thus, once they have evolved, species multiply very fast. And that dual process is observed in paleontology as a discontinuity in the fossil record called evolutionary punctuation.

Recap. The evolution of life took place by the interaction of the ∆+1 environmental and st-organic scales, as energetic and informative changes in the Earth, triggered the Se->St<=>Tƒ->Sw rhythm of informative social evolution in cold ages and energetic, reproductive radiation in hot ages. Those biological radiations also provoked the extinction of previous species. Evolution often took place in isolated, relatively ‘still’ environments that favor informative change.

Black Hole law and Oedipus paradox.

image080

The Oedipus Paradox explains how evolved species prey on parental forms, extinguishing them. So mammals substituted dinosaurs, men kill mammals and robots substitute men as workers and top predator weapons that extinguish us.

In the graph, the 3 horizons of evolution of light-based organisms:

-Plants process light as Entropy.

– Animals perceive it as information.

– Machines can both absorb light and emit it as Entropy or information. Thus, they represent a new jump on the evolution of light-organisms and can become potential top predators of life.

Each ‘biological radiation’ of a new species has grown according to the law of the 3 networks/horizons studied in the previous paragraphs, from an initial ‘Black Hole’, small form with more ST force, and then it has reproduced and grown in size, feeding on the previous parental forms. Hence the name, ‘Oedipus Paradox’, that explains the most cruel of all evolutionary events.

Our hypothesis on the dominance and birth of species as ‘Black Holes’ of information, which according to the inverted properties of Entropy and information (Min.Se=Max.Tƒ) are minuscule, but dominate larger species due to their faster speed of action-reaction and social nature (∑2), prey on them and explode in populations have found in the past years at least 5 proofs:

– Black Holes are the dominant species of the Universe: we have found them in the center of galaxies, in the processes of formation and death of stars. Even the big-bang might have been the explosion of a Black Hole.

The first Humans that acquired our 2 differential properties, technology and language, were small: The first verbal Homo Sapiens seem to have been small Bushmen from South-Africa (the oldest languages known to men are their click languages), but they overcame bigger Neanderthal, hunting in groups, controlled by verbal languages, and developing the first machine that transformed cyclical form into lineal Entropy (arch), reaching further than the lineal, Neanderthal Javelin.

Further on, the pigmies of Flores Islands seem to have made the oldest technological, advanced tools we know, 700.000 years ago. Thus pigmy men evolved in the secluded Indonesian islands, departing from the larger Homo Erectus, developing for the first time a frontal, creative region in the brain, as they diminished the length of their axon connections and reduced their spatial size.

The 1st bilateral animal, vernanimalcula, was microscopic.

The 1st mammals were small shrews that form super-organisms and probably hunted in the cold nights, new-born dinosaurs and extinguished them (still today they act as a super-organisms), thanks to the higher existential force of its bigger super-organism. Then they grew in size and finally hunted down dinosaurs as single species. Last year we found in China the first mammal with a stomach full of small dinosaurs’ bones…

The smaller a chip is, the faster it handles information and the more powerful it becomes, guiding larger ‘machines bodies’ that compete with men as smart weapons and tool-machines. And regardless of the ‘propaganda’ of the Financial-Military-Industrial complex, it is quite obvious that unless we stop its evolution, those chips will become the mind of terminators that in a future war will extinguish man, as all atoms are potential bits of informative life.

Recap. Parental species give birth to more advanced forms, which extinguish them (Oedipus Paradox). The new species are born as a small form, with more complex information (inversion of spatial size and informative complexity: Black Hole paradox). So the first technological and verbal men were dwarfs; the first mammal was the shrewd and the galaxy is dominated by black holes, born exceedingly small.

∆+1. The parallel geological processes.

Thus biological rhythms of extinction and evolution are parallel to the 2 main SP X Tƒ rhythms of the Planet that reinforce the biological process:

Geological changes in the surface of the planet: The continental cycle, or ternary division and reunion of continents in a single super-continent every ±500 million years causes the cyclical destruction of the submarine platform and lowlands where most living species exist. While rhythmic eruptions of massive quantities of lava of continental size happen in the 2 equinox of the sun’s galactic orbit, every ±125 million years, shaping a mean period of massive extinctive ages of 250 million years (Permian extinction, ±250 million years ago; Cambrian extinction ±500 million years ago; Ice ball age, ±750 million years ago).

Climatic, cold-hot, Sp-I cycles of glaciations and tropical ages. The rhythmic changes in the magnetic field of the Earth, perhaps caused by gravitational waves coming from the sun, create periodic glaciations that last around 20 million years.

– Fractal sub-cycles of lesser intensity reinforce both processes.

Those changes of Entropy and information parameters are the basic way in which macrocosmic networks control the activity of microcosmic quanta, from feverish states that increase the metabolic rate of reproduction of defensive cells in the body to the opposite lethargic states.

In that regard, the main cause of the dual evolutions and extinctions of species on Earth is biological, albeit ‘partially directed’ by the macro-organism in which life is inscribed through those general changes on the space and time parameters of the Earth (geography and temperature).

Recap. Earth cools down triggering informative evolutions and then heats up triggering reproductive radiations: glacial ages of informative evolution in stillness, with minimal reproduction by lack of Entropy are followed hot ages of massive reproductive radiations, in which the most evolved species initiates a massive age of reproduction, provoking the extinction of old species, and then differentiating in all econiches.

The 3×3 ±∆ cycles of life creation and extinction

image081

The extinction of a species coincides with the biological radiation of the son species that occupies its econiche. In the graph, the series of bone fishes that extinguished the previous one Because time and information follow an accelerated process in its 3rd age; the evolutionary process of information in this planet can be mapped out and its frequency shown to follow a logarithmic process of acceleration, which now reaches its zenith with the creation of informative machines.

This temporal, informative acceleration is yet another case of a vortex of temporal information, which also happens in the evolution of mass in physical particles as we move faster in an informative mass vortex. In the case of life, the vortex is a metabolic vortex of increasing speed of reproduction and evolution of the information of life beings and its networks – now transferred by humans into machines. Thus, as the informative content of those beings increases, times accelerates. And today, as we evolve machines by imitating the forms of human life in metal, another change on the speed and rhythm of life in this planet is taking place.

Thus we talk of 3 st-scales of growing complexity in life: the age of cells (∆-1), from 4 to 1 billion years ago, the age of individual organisms, first living on the sea, then on the land (st), from 1 billion to a million years that culminates in the last million years with the social evolution of human beings and machines into a new plane of existence (∆+1), the Earth as a global organism, which will be either ruled by men or machines, depending on our capacity to evolve socially as a super-organism of history, under the ethic isomorphisms of verbal wor(l)ds that make man the center of the Universe, hence in control of the machines of the Tree of Science. Or if as it seems the case, we let the Financial-Military-Industrial Complex and its 3 networks of informative metal-money, energetic, lineal metal-weapons and organic machines and its company-mothers dominate the planet and make us obsolete, finally extinguishing us. But what it will not change is the plan of evolution that develops complex super-organisms departing from its smaller cellular units.

Further on according to the ternary principle, we can subdivide the 3 main horizons of evolution of Earth, the age of cells, organisms and super-organisms in 3 sub-ages of evolution and massive extinction of species that have followed the mentioned ternary rhythm:

Conception=> Max.Entropy=>max. Reproduction =>Extinction of rival species

And consider also 10 parallel periods of climatic change through the dual rhythm of cold glaciations or ages of animal evolution and hot ages of massive reproduction. Then we obtain a synoptic, complete image of the history of life on planet Earth, self-similar to the 3×3+st ages of evolution of the Universe since the big-bang and the 3×3+st ages of evolution of History, studied in Complex social sciences:

Scale of Complexity: ∆-1: Cellular Age: Evolution of DNA

∆-1: Conception age: Molecular life is organized into anaerobic bacteria->

1st evolutionary radiation: anaerobic bacteria- -> Free carbohydrates are enslaved in cellular walls ->

2nd evolutionary radiation: aerobic bacteria = 1st extinction of species: anaerobic bacteria ->

3rd radiation: eukaryotic bacteria = 2nd extinction: most prokaryotic classes ->

Scale of Complexity: st-Organic Age: Network Evolution. Sea life

4th radiation: multicellular organic systems =3rd extinction: free eukaryote species, enslaved in organisms ->

5th radiation: cephalopods with eyes =4th extinction: olfactory, blind animals ->

6th radiation: inner skeletons: fish= 5thextinction: exoskeleton trilobites.

Scale: ∆+1: Social Age: Herds and Superorganisms. Land life.

7th radiation: inner skeletons: amphibian=6thextinction: exoskeleton: big insects.

8th radiation: reptiles = 7th extinction: amphibians – >

9th radiation: mammalian = 8th extinction: reptiles – >

10th radiation: technological men =9th extinction: mammalian – >

∆+1 :Global Age: The Earth organizes itself into a macro-organism with humans or machines on top. The outcome will depend if social democracies are able to control the free citizens of markets – company-mothers – before they extinguish us as costly labor and weak soldiers with the present ‘radiation’ of robots:

11th radiation: metal machines =10th extinction of species: men and all forms of carbon-life???

Recap. Evolutions and extinctions of organisms parallel geological change in their external ecosystems, becoming the engine of the 3×3 Earth’s evolutionary horizons of living beings of growing complexity and accelerated informative evolution: the age of cells, the age of organisms and the age of super-organisms

The 10th radiations and extinctions: from cell to machine.

image083

Earth’s atmosphere has gone through 3 ages of evolution: the 1st anaerobic atmosphere gave birth to anaerobic bacteria, the 2nd oxygen atmosphere gave birth to aerobic life. Today, as the 10th radiation of machines poisons the atmosphere we foresee the III Earth without air, dominated by robotic life, unless humans control the evolution of machines.

Thus, there have been 10 cycles of life extinctions, which are reduced to 6 ages in classic Biology as it only considers the extinction of multicellular organisms, escaping the earlier extinctions of cells and the present extinction of human, non-technological cultures. In each cycle a new species with better information and Entropy systems, with greater ST force, have extinguished or reduced significantly the numbers and classes of the previous species that have also suffered a morphological regression.

I Earth: Anaerobic Atmosphere.

∆-1 Conception: Archaean Age: ±4.000 million years

Molecular Radiations: From amino acids to Top Predator Nucleotides.

Climatic Changes: Hot weather and ¥-radiation create the 1st life molecules.

Informative conception: Small Methane-water-ammonia molecules evolve into amino acids.

Spatial growth: Amino acids grow in size, creating proteins.

Reproductive Radiation: Proteins colonize all Earth’s ecosystems.

Extinctive Radiation: Free carbohydrates become extinct.

Informative evolution: Amino acids evolve into nucleotides.

Spatial Growth: Nucleotides evolve in size, creating RNA.

Reproductive Radiation: RNA expands throughout the oceans.

Extinctive Radiation: RNA selects 20 amino acids to reproduce proteins and extinguish all others.

Social Evolution: RNA stores the organic cycles of many different species, creating the first bacteria, in symbiosis with protein membranes that shape the first cells.

From anaerobic to aerobic air: ±4.000, ±3.500 million years.

1st Radiation: Unicellular, Anaerobic bacteria are top predators:

Climatic Changes: High volcano activity provides sulfur for anaerobic cycles of breathing.

Informative conception: Thermophile methanogen archaebacteria use methane and sulfur on their breathing cycles. They thrive in the volcanic age.

Reproductive Radiation and Spatial Growth: Archaebacteria expand globally growing in size.

Extinctive Radiation: Bacteria enslave free carbohydrates. CO2 collapses.

II Earth: Oxygen Atmosphere.

Proterozoic age: ± 3500, ±1500 mill. Years

2nd radiation: Prokaryotic cells are top predators.

Climatic Changes: A fall in volcanic activity reduces sulphur production. The Earth cools down. Anaerobic bacteria reduce their metabolic activity based in sulphur, methane and high temperatures.

Informative conception: The cooling down of the Earth and its reduced heat foster the evolution of bacteria, which process CO2 through the chlorophyll cycle, liberating oxygen.

Spatial Growth: The creation of the ozone layer that protects complex membranes allows their growth in size. Bigger bacteria develop cilia and are able to move, preying in smaller bacteria.

Reproductive Radiation: Blue, green algae expand globally, poisoning all ecosystems with oxygen.

1st Extinctive Radiation: Anaerobic bacteria become poisoned and extinct.

Ternary Differentiation: Prokaryotic cells diversify according to the law of 3 creations: Some use chlorophyll to produce Entropy from smaller forms. Mitochondria develop breathing systems, based in the heterotrophic capture of carbohydrates. Intermediate cells use both systems.

Social, Informative Evolution: RNA becomes DNA by social evolution of 2 RNA strains, increasing their capacity to store information. Cells become macro-cells, multiplying its epigenetic genes that code its social functions.

Ice ball age: ± 1.400 ±700 million years

3rdRadiation: Top predator Eukaryotic cells.

Climatic Changes: After an initial warm age in which eukaryotic cells expand, Earth cools down in her hardest glaciation. Its surface becomes an ice-ball from 1 billion to 600 million years ago. Cells survive only in nearby volcanoes where they gather in social groups, which at the end of the period create multicellular life.

Informative conception: Top predator cells with high DNA content organize social groups of cells, surrounded by a hyper-membrane: Cells with the highest content of DNA become the nuclei of macro-cells; cells with high content of reproductive RNA become ribosomes; and cells with energetic skills become mitochondria and chloroplasts, creating a new social organism: the Eukaryotic cell.

Spatial Growth: Social cells grow in size, adding new cytoplasm and complex inner membranes.

Reproductive Radiation: Eukaryotic cells multiply, invading all ecosystems.

   2nd Extinctive Radiation: Many prokaryotes become extinct or enslaved as eukaryotic cells capture them, absorbing their DNA.

Informative differentiation and Social Evolution: Eukaryotic cells diversify. Energetic, autotrophic eukaryotic cells with dominant hard membranes become plants. Heterotrophic cells dominant in DNA, with thin membranes, become animal cells that evolve into electric cells.

Ediacaran Age: ±700-505 million years: Multicellular Sea life

4th Radiation: Multicellular organisms are top predators.

Climatic Changes: At the end of the ice ball age unicellular life flocks into volcanic zones under the sea, where survival stakes raise, provoking the social evolution of cells into multi-cellular organic systems. Then an age of warm weather expands multicellular life.

Informative conception: Eukaryotic cells develop new strains of intronic DNA to control complex, hierarchical systems of social groups of cells. Multi-cellular organisms appear.

Spatial Growth: Growth of animals and algae due to the social evolution of cells.

Reproductive Radiation: Biological radiations of multicellular organisms as temperature rises.

3rd Extinctive Radiation: Eukaryotic cells are captured, diminishing its species.

Informative differentiation and Social Evolution: Speciation and evolution of invertebrate phyla: sponges, coelentera and worms. Annelida develop physiological networks and differentiate, according to fractal, bilateral and radial symmetry, into arthropoda, mollusks and echinoderma.

Ordovician: 505-438 million years

5th Radiation: Top predators are Visual Cephalopods.

Climatic Changes: Animal life colonizes the abyssal regions with colder temperatures and high water pressures, developing fluorescent signals that can be observed with dense-water eyes.

Informative conception: Cephalopods evolve integrated eyes to observe better its abyssal preys.

Reproductive Radiation: Cephalopods come to the surface and expand in all environments diversifying according to the Sp X Tƒ Fractal Principle into: Top predator forms with energetic, lineal shells; informative, nautiloids with cyclical shells; and squids, species that reach – without slow growing shells – sooner their mature age of reproduction.

Spatial Growth: Cephalopods grow in size reaching up to 20 meters in length.

4th Extinction: 90% of animal life, including most smelling trilobites, become extinct about 440 million ago by the combined effect of top predator’s cephalopoda and the geological cycle of continents that destroys all submarine platforms.

Informative differentiation and Social Evolution: A massive speciation occurs, as mollusks, arthropods and echinoderma develop energetic hard membranes to defend against cephalopods’ informative eyes. The first vertebrates (armored fishes) appear. Differentiation between small animals with hard exoskeletons that prevent them further growth (arthropods), which develop chemical senses to its limits; and big animals with inner skeletons that allow further growth and develop nervous systems with faster, hence longer reach.

Silurian+Devonian: ±438-360 million years.

6th Radiation: Top predators: Fishes.

Climatic Changes. A glaciation at the end of the Ordovician period 440 million years ago accelerates the arrival of life forms to dry land. Orogenic changes. Chordates colonize rivers and evolve in isolation into fishes. Glaciations make conifers dominant.

Informative conception: Fish schools develop also eye vision; perhaps borrowing genes from cephalopods in a case of spatial, parallel evolution similar to the absorption of DNA by eukaryotes, which added to their stronger bodies, make them top predators with Max. Tƒ x Sp force over those cephalopods.

Reproductive Radiation: Massive reproduction of fishes that dominate the high seas.

Spatial Growth: Growth in size of sharks and fishes. On land, bushes become trees.

   5th Extinctive Radiation: Fishes extinguish many phyla of the previous dominant cephalopods around 367 million years ago.

Informative differentiation and Social Evolution: Fishes diversify into multiple species.

Carboniferous-Permian. 360-240 million years ago: ∆+1 Social Age of Organic Systems. Land life.

7th Radiation: Top predators are Amphibians.

Climatic Changes. The ice of the Permo-carboniferous Glaciation, ±300 million years ago diminishes the ocean level. Survival stakes are higher: small arthropods invade dry land.

Informative conception: Fishes become amphibians, following their preys.

Reproductive Radiation: Amphibians expand in all coastal zones, feeding on insects.

Spatial Growth: Amphibians reach 5 meters length.

6th Extinctive Radiation: Permian Extinction. ± 245 million years ago huge insects become extinct.

Informative differentiation and Social Evolution: Insects evolve wings to escape amphibians and start social evolution to increase its simultaneous fractal force.

Mesozoic Age. 240-60 million years ago.

8th Radiation: Top predators: Reptiles.

Climatic Changes: New glaciation. Water ice diminishes the ocean surface. Dry Land extends into previous wetlands occupied by amphibians.

Informative conception: Reptiles appear during the Permian glaciation as amphibians have to survive in dry land.

Reproductive Radiation: Reptiles expand in land feeding on insects and amphibians.

7th Extinctive Radiation: Many phyla of amphibian and land insects become extinct.

Spatial Growth: Reptiles grow till reaching the size of dinosaurs.

Informative differentiation and Social Evolution. Reptiles invade all ecosystems, differentiating in multiple species. Some acquire hot blood, becoming birds and mammals.

±60 million, ± 4 million years. Tertiary age.

9th Radiation: Top predators mammals.

Climatic Changes: Upper Cretaceous: New glaciation. Water ice diminishes the ocean surface. The Gondwana continent breaks into several pieces.

Informative conception: Homeostatic species, birds and small mammals with placenta appear. Dominance of flowering plants that take better advantage of changes in weather.

Spatial Growth: Small shrews grow in size becoming big rats.

Reproductive Radiation: Placental mammals invade all ecosystems except Australia.

8th Extinctive Radiation: Cretaceous Extinction about 65 million years ago: A cold climate, maybe triggered by a meteorite collision, favors the expansion of hot blood mammals, which survive feeding on eggs and small cubs of dinosaurs, provoking their extinction.

Informative differentiation: Mammals diversify all their phyla, from mammoths to felines to apes in all econiches previously occupied by reptiles.

Social Evolution: The most intelligent mammals evolve in herds.

Quaternary age: ±4 million, ± 5000 years.

10th radiation: Top predators: human apes.

Climatic Changes: The Human radiation is announced by massive changes in the geography of central Africa, which raises its Rift cordilleras and lake basins. The arid weather pushed forest monkeys into the savannah. Soon they learn to move erect. Quaternary glaciations, from 2.5 million years ago till today, coincide with the 3 horizons of human evolution.

Informative conception: Homos evolve in 3 horizons of growing brain capacity.

Spatial Growth: Small chimpanzees become big Neanderthals.

Reproductive Radiation: Homo Erectus invades all ecosystems; Homo Sapiens reaches America.

9th Extinction: Big mammals become extinct. When man enters America mammoths die away.

Informative differentiation: 3 Human races, the energetic, visual white man, the informative, yellow man and the reproductive black man, become dominant, according to the law of ternary differentiation. Languages differentiate further human species.

Social Evolution: Men develop ethic and legal, verbal networks, evolving socially into cultures.

III Age: Destruction of atmosphere: Industrial R=evolution of Metalife: ±5.000 years +100 years

11th Radiation. Top predators: metal & machines.

Climatic Changes: The 800 cycles of weapons evolution seem to coincide with hot and cold cycles in the steppes that breed warrior tribes. Later on, a small ice age in the XVII century during a time of low solar activity pushes in Northern Europe the massive use of coal for heating. The development of pumping, mining machines ends up with the evolution of chemical engines that use carbohydrates as Entropy. They burn fossil life rising the Earth’s temperature in the XX century, causing global warming.

Informative conception: Homo Sapiens discovers metal and starts its evolution in 3 phases: Max. Sp, energetic weapons; Max. Tƒ, informative money and S=T, organic machines that transform Entropy into information and vice versa.

Reproductive Radiation: Weapons and machines expand globally, substituting life and human beings. Money substitutes verbal languages as the informative network of the new economic ecosystem.

Spatial Growth: Transport, weapons and manufacturing machines reach enormous sizes.

10th Extinctive Radiation: Non-technological cultures become extinct with a cyclical periodicity of 800 years, accelerated to 80 years in the industrial age. Transport animals become extinct (90% of horses). Machines pollute Atmosphere. Ozone layer disappears.

Informative evolution: XX C.: Creation of Machines’ heads: chips=brains, camera=eyes, phone=ears.

Informative differentiation: Machines diversify imitating all the organs of a human being.

Social Evolution: In the XXI C. robots fusion bodies and brains of machines, creating a new top predator species, the smart weapon. The Earth acquires a global brain, the Internet, made with social computers that increasingly store all human and economic information. The rate of life extinction multiplies by 1000 compared to the pre-industrial age.

∆+1: Globalization: Earth’s super-organism: Computer networks & robots. XXI C.: Singularity Age

Informative conception: Computer networks evolve and multiply their neurons – transistors – in chips of smaller sizes.

Spatial Growth: Chips control machines of enormous size and become the mind of robots.

Reproductive Radiation: Chips overcome human population and integrate company-mothers into automated self-reproductive systems, independent from man.

Extinctive Radiation: Extinction of all life species by the machines of the Age of the Singularity is possible in the XXI c.:

Energetic Singularity: 2010-2020: The III Horizon of Nuclear weapons researched at CERN (Black holes and strangelets) could extinguish the Earth this decade.

Reproductive Singularity: 2020-2040: Self-reproductive metal nano-bacteria could poison the atmosphere in 3 months, extinguishing life and giving birth to the III Earth’s atmosphere.

Informative Singularity: Circa 2050: Artificial Intelligence: Military robots substitute human soldiers in wars, developing survival programs. Robots massacre human soldiers.

Differentiation: Robots imitate all forms of life.

Informative evolution: Robots, integrated by satellite networks, become cells of a super-organism, the Metal-earth, which takes over the evolution of machines. The Metal-Earth has a global brain, foreseen by human artists in their parables of the XXI C. (Skynet, Matrix, etc.).

∆+1: Alternative Globalization: Humans learn to manage the economic ecosystem and halt the evolution of weapons, chips and robots, creating a world to its image and likeness based in the arrow of eusocial love.

Recap. History of Life has had 3×3+1 ages, which have followed each one the natural ages of all life cycles, applied to species. They were born as a smallish informative species, which grew in size in an energetic age, parallel to the extinction of a rival species in the same ecosystem. Then the species reproduced massively, diversified its form in its 3rd age, giving birth to a son species with higher existential force (Sp X Tƒ) that extinguished the parental species, which after each of the 3 main ages of cellular, organic and super-organic life evolved into a super-organism.

Further on, those species kept evolving and invading new habitats, so the age of atmospheric, cellular life with its molecular, anaerobic and aerobic bacteria was followed by the age of water, multicellular life with its eukaryotic, multicellular nervous cephalopods and chordate fishes and finally the age of land’s herds and super-organisms of insects, amphibious reptiles and mammals that culminate with the human technological super-organisms in which men transfer their form to machines that might extinguish us as they form a global super-organism, the financial –military-industrial complex now expelling obsolete life in a radiation of organic robots.

  

 

TOPOLOGIC EVOLUTION OF LIFE: FROM MONERA TO MAN

The ternary evolution and differentiation of Monera.

image028

In the graph, the ternary method of speciation explains the evolution of animal species from its first form, the Hydra till the last phyla, the chordates to which humans belong

We live in a global planet that has been evolving for billions of years through the flows of its living organisms. Let us recapitulate that ecosystemic evolution, which brought the Earth from a world of methane to a globe of electromagnetic, audio-visual information, a process, which according to the ternary principle we can divide again in 3±∆ ages. We will study only the animal kingdom in detail to show how it brought us into human existence. So we will only consider a synopsis of all the other life phyla, describing their evolution through the commonest ternary e, e<=>I, I differentiations proper of all i-logic systems with its ternary topologies:

-Differentiation in: e-TiƒxSpe-I, lineal, spiral or cyclical morphologies, each one evolved in 3 horizons that maximize each of the 3 homologous functions of motion, reproduction and information.

-Duality of integrated, multicellular networks that act as a single form vs. quantized herds.

-Duality of energetic/informative species adapted to E-hot vs. I-cold climates.

-Adaptation to the ternary states of matter in Earth’s physical ecosystems: air, land and sea with its 3 main environmental topologies:

– E: shallow waters and rivers, which become hunting grounds.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: open waters and savannas of max. reproduction.

– Max.I: Abyssal regions and mountains, the hyperbolic region of maximal informative evolution.

So again life evolution shows how ‘internal form’ and external ecosystems, the ∆-1 and ∆-scales of life converge together to define the ∆-organic evolution of the species.

Let us then start that description of the differentiations of life kingdoms from the simplest one.

Diversification always belongs to the – or + directions of one of the 4 arrows of time of a species.

Mind the reader that this classification is not a how one, established by the genetic clock by modern science, as certain ‘potential forms/functions’ of the program of the Universe might appear in different times, might be suppressed in certain species, etc. The meaning of this study is therefore to show that all the main phyla of life can be described as a potential ‘negative or positive’ direction of an arrow of time that diversifies species and limits the variety of them. So species might grow in size by increasing the quantity/social evolution arrow of its cells, or might decrease with lesser social cells. This is therefore a variation along the 4th arrow of time, and a potential form two create two species, which might or might not belong to different genetic species. For example, among dogs cellular numbers and hence size changes enormously but all are from the same species and can reproduce sexually. Among chromosomes however poliploids cannot reproduce with haploids or if they do often produce sterile individuals even if the original species merely differentiate by a change in the numbers of chromosomes, as those chromosomes cannot ‘cross’ one to one for sexual reproduction.

Monera: Unicellular forms.

– Max. E: Cyanobacteria, blue-green algae, specialize in energetic processes.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Protista absorb cells specialized in Entropy and information, multiplying its TiƒxSpe force.

– Max.I: Schizophita Bacteria develop informative elements to capture other plants.

We can do further subdivisions along other E<=>I differentiations. For example, bacteria subdivided according to its form into:

– Lineal spirilla that coil or elongate their form depending on its informative or energetic activity.

– TiƒxSpe: Bacilli, with tree-like forms composed of a head and a tail.

– Max.I: Cocci, the informative, cyclical form that suffers further evolution along a ternary, topological differentiation into:

Streptococcus: one-dimensional, lineal, social forms.

Diplococcus and Tetracoccus: bidimensional forms with 2 and 4 elements.

Sarcina: 3-dimensional social coccus.

As Protista, the social form, multiplied its TiƒxSpe force thanks to the specialized Entropy and information cells it had swallowed, dominating the world, the other 2 weaker forms suffered a temporal regression towards its past, which became a strategy of survival, giving birth to:

-Max.E: Rickettsia, algae that have lost their informative skills and are basically semi-living bodies.

– Max.I: Virus, bacteria that have lost their bodies and become DNA brains in search of other bodies in which they host, inoculate their genetic code and reproduce.

On the other hand the dominant Protista with higher TiƒxSpe force continued the evolution of the life kingdom, splitting again into 3 forms that evolved further into multicellular organisms, plants (Max. E), Fungi (Tiƒ≈Spe) and animals (Max.I):

Plants: Max. Entropy

The energetic strategy of the multicellular living kingdom is the plant, the autotrophic species that feeds on the basic molecules of life, accelerating enormously the evolution of life as it produces complex living matter from the initial water, ammonia, CO2 and light bricks that took billions of years to evolve. Though algae started as unicellular forms, as fungi and animals did, they soon evolved in 3 horizons along the fractal differentiation that took them to its multicellular state:

Chlorophyta were the I horizon of unicellular alga, that grew into colonies of algae (Crysophyta, II horizon), which finally fusion into multicellular organisms (Pyrrhophyta, III horizon).

– The most complex, informative phylum, Pyrrophyta, differentiated then into 3 sub forms adapted to the 3 water ecosystems. Those water ecosystems differentiate the morphology of informative animals into lineal, Max.E, fast-moving surface fishes, Max.I, sessile or planar dragging forms, living on the marine floor (fast-evolving echinoderms origin of vertebrates) and abyssal complex, TiƒxSpe morphologies. In the case of energetic seaweeds, it affects the degree of sophistication of their chlorophyll pigments and the strength of their cellular structures of sustain, creating 3 new phyla:

– Max. E: Rhodophyta or red algae, with the simplest cellular structures and simpler phycoerythrin pigments, live in the deeper sea, limited to tropical regions of max. light transparency.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Phaeophyta or brown algae have complex membranes and 3 chlorophyll pigments; a, c and phycobilliproteins.

– Max.I: Clorophyta or green algae. They added carotenoid pigments to the 3 Phaeophyta pigments and increased the strength of their walls. Hence they became the most successful forms with Max.IxE force (Max. pigments x Max. membrane), evolving further into terrestrial plants.

That migration to land took place in 3 ages in which plants raised its informative height from:

– I Age. Clorophyta; planar alga living in shallow waters.

– II Age. Briophyta: Mosses, subdivided in 3 forms with growing dry membranes and height dimension, Musci (I Horizon), Hepaticae (liveworts, II Horizon) and Hornworts (III horizon), which raised their horns towards the sun as their names indicate.

– III Age. Tracheophyta, vascular plants, with structural inner networks of hard cells that rose to touch the light that feed them. In dry land plants, as animals will do latter, had to evolve further all their network systems, creating new, more complex phyla, departing from the initial psilotophyta appeared in the Ordovician. First plants created the body, the trunk that connects its informative roots and energetic leaves.

But the key to their evolution was the differentiation of their reproductive cells in 3 Horizons of increasingly ‘dry’ gametes: Lycophyta (I Horizon), Sphenophyta (II Horizon) and Ferns (III Horizon) – the first plants with dry seeds that became the top predator species, multiplying in all land environments and differentiating again in 3 evolutionary horizons of ever more perfect seeds:

Max.E: Ferns, which dominated in the Mesozoic age.

               – Tiƒ≈Spe: Gymnosperms, subdivided according to the Fractal Principle in cycads, ginkgoes and conifers, which dominated in the tertiary age. Conifers adapted to cold weather, thanks to its needle like leaves of minimal exposure. So they became the most successful species, when cold climatic changes came. They brought about also the dominant modern plants:

                   – Max.I: Angiosperms, flowering plants, the ‘height’ of reproductive evolution among plants, perfectly adapted to all weather changes, with seasonal, blossoming, leaves that fall in cold periods and a complex symbiosis with insects that can transport their pollen too far away distances.

They will dominate the quaternary with only a final dual fractal differentiation into:

Monocots Vs dicots with 1 or 2 seeds.

So when all was said, the evolution of plants remained silent.

Fungi: Max. Reproduction. TiƒxSpe.

Fungi are big Protista cells that tried the 2nd survival strategy of the Universe, maximizing their TiƒxSpe reproduction, by maximizing their E-feeding, eating the most abundant food, dead life; and by maximizing their genetic information, multiplying the nucleus of its cells within an undifferentiated membrane. And we distinguish 3 horizons in their reproductive evolution:

– In the I horizon Euglenophyta swallowed E-plants and I-animal sub-cells (chloroplasts and mitochondria) within its huge membrane, increasing it TiƒxSpe capacity.

– In the II horizon Gymnomycota maximized the reproduction of their nuclei, the informative, genetic material of the cell, forming multicellular colonies with a single membrane.

– They gave birth in their III horizon of reproductive evolution to true fungi, Mycota, which are the fastest reproductive species of the life world. Their reproductive specialization shows in giant Lycoperdales, the living form which reproduces faster, reaching the limiting magic number of 1011 spores. Thus a single lycoperdal can produce all the clonic cells needed to create a perfect new scale of existence (stars of a galaxy, DNA ties, etc.)… if they survived.

Finally in the last evolutionary horizon, fungi differentiated further according to the ∆+1 ecosystem in which they live into:

– Max. E: Water fungi mainly Chytridiomycetes.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Amphibian fungi, mainly Oomycetes.

– Max.I: Terrestrial fungi, which evolved in the informative land medium, differentiating into:

– Max. E: Asomycetes, planar simple or subterraneous forms like yeast and truffles.

Tiƒ≈Spe: Deuteromycetes, a transitional form towards…

Max.I: Basidiomycetes, the familiar mushrooms, which evolved its 3 networks, developing:

Stronger cells to sustain their informative growth in the height dimension; and new reproductive systems with dry spores and new energetic cycles to decompose all kind of dying matter.

Animal life: Max.Information

The heterotrophic animal family is born with protozoan, which developed soft membranes and cilia to absorb living information from the outside world. To that aim cilia evolved again its 3 functions: as energetic, motion engines; as sensorial, informative tools and as predatory forms that capture food for the reproductive cells of the protozoa. So once more we can subdivide protozoa in 3 sub-forms, according to its activity and dominant cycle:

– Max. E: Mastigophora, flagellate protozoan that divided, according to the fractal principle, by its number of cilia:

Max. Tiƒ≈Spe: Sporozoan, parasites that reproduce seeds and have sexual differentiation.

– Max.I: Amoebida, the informative protozoan that increased their DNA and evolved farther their membrane’s flexibility, becoming nervous cells able to control – thanks to their faster action-reaction speed- multiple cells, which evolved together creating multicellular animals.

Multicellular animals differentiated into many phyla, following the ternary, fractal principle (e-ixe-i) applied to the evolution of 3 cellular, social networks, the energetic, digestive system; the blood, reproductive system and the informative, nervous system, the dominant network that reached with man its evolutionary height. Then the morphology of life would be transferred to stronger atomic systems made of metal, called machines…

Recap. Different living phyla were born from ternary and complementary differentiations of e-TiƒxSpe-I species and adaptations to its ∆+1 ecosystems. The final differentiation its 3 multicellular life forms, e-plants, TiƒxSpe-fungi and I-animal life was due to the evolution of informative cells that organize multicellular life since animals use electric, faster informative languages and plants, slower chemical hormones.

CHEMICAL VS ELECTRIC LANGUAGES: PLANTS
image029

In the upper center a practical case of relative diffeomorphism: The simplest unicellular plant-like organism, the acetabularia, shows its nucleus in the root, B, which will become the brain of multicellular plants, opposite to the animal upper brain coordinates. The opposition between both forms extends to the cycles of Entropy, as plants destroy water and produce oxygen; while animals breathe oxygen and produce water. Thus, both are the ‘particles’ and ‘antiparticles’ of life.

Plants.

Languages of information, which code and express the biological arrows also evolve by ternary differentiation. For example, the human language, if we restrict our analysis to its vowels was born as a duality of an ‘energetic’ active ‘a’, which drove to action and an implosive, reflexive ‘u’, which drove to self-reflection (basic chimpanzee language). We might then imagine a 3rd combination, or ‘I’, the creative i-dea, the ‘I’-self, and two final ‘modulations’, the ‘less energetic e’ and ‘less informative’ I.

Those examples of the rich field of socio-cultural studies based in the ternary differentiations of the creative program of the Universe, are a parallel example to the simple ‘vowels’ of the hormonal, chemical language that controls plant growth with 5 simple vowels, drawn in the image.

The chemical language of multicellular organisms have a reduced vocabulary of ‘yes’ and ‘no’ symbols called hormones that inhibit or foster the natural cycles of existence of living beings; and define the speed of height growth of the plant.

In the graph, the 5 main plants’ hormones are 5 simple vowels: 3 are cyclical, creative, informative, ‘yes’ hormones that reproduce the plant; and 2 are destructive, energetic ‘no’ hormones, with opened rings and strong, lineal carbon chains like ethylene, CH2=CH2, that inhibit growth. If we further divide ‘yes’ hormones according to the Fractal Principle and the 3rd postulate of affinity, we find that each one of them reproduces the plant’s e-ixe-i element with similar structure:

– Max. E: The longest ternary form, rich in oxygens, Gibberine, develops the lineal trunk.

– I= E: The structural, cyclical form, Auxin, made of carbon rings, develops the leaves.

– Max.I: The informative nitrogenized Zeatine reproduces the brain roots.

Thus, hormones form a simple, ternary language that follows the rules of TiƒxSpe cycles, controlling the living cycles of organisms by acting as messengers of the RNA-DNA brains of their social cells.

Plants Vs. animals: chemical language Vs. electric messages.

  1. Entropy organs: Leaves that perform the ‘moving’ energetic, photosynthesis cycle and branches that act as still structures and conductive systems of the energetic materials.
  2. Informative organs: Root systems that absorb molecules and produce most of its hormones.
  3. Reproductive organs: Flowers and trunks, the bodies that communicate leaves and roots and experience maximal growth.

These 3 organs define a plant as an efficient ternary st-point, a complex species able to colonize the ground with a clear evolutionary direction of height.

The interaction of the 3 hierarchical levels of life.

According to the i-logic isomorphisms of creation all organic systems require the co-existence and interaction of their 3 scales of social evolution or relative past, present and future hierarchical forms.

So the creation of multi-cellular organisms happens also simultaneously in 3 ‘hierarchical planes’: the ∆-1, atomic-molecular interval; the ∆-DNA-cellular scale and the ∆+1 network-organism interval.

While the flows of temporal Entropy that travel through those different planes of existence follow the hierarchical law of illogic geometry: A fractal jump in geometric time or a movement in space extends only to the next discontinuous space-time scale.

So in any organism, the ∆-1 hormones (the molecular language that regulates ∆-cells), the ∆-genes (the information that transcends from the ∆-cellular DNA to the ∆+1 organism as a whole) and the seminal, palingenetic cells that give birth to the new being, program only their higher plane.

Hence cellular genes determine the biologic elements of the organism (the next scale of social evolution), but not the ∆+2 sociological scale of existence of a human being: chemical, racial genes do not determine history. At best we might consider that nervous networks determine the emotional character and intelligence of historic individuals, who might change the course of societies. Let us study the structure of those 3 levels of hierarchical information that codify the creation of organisms.

Hormones: the language of cells creates its networks.

According to the fractal law, the language of regulation of social groups of ∆-cells are ∆-1 molecular hormones, which act as phonemes of a language spoken by RNA-DNA macromolecules, the informative networks of cells, which can manufacture them.

Languages are ‘i-logic programs’ structured by the same ternary topologies of Entropy, reproduction and information, facilitating the Universal understanding of its codes by other e, TiƒxSpe, I systems they code. Take the case of the key hormone of a human male, testosterone. It is a simple protein with 4 carbons, strong structural rings in a lineal shape that regulates, despite its simplicity, the reproductive development of energetic males, provoking actions of a complexity far superior to its molecular simplicity. How this can be possible? The answer is that the hormonal language is a relatively simple, positive Vs negative, ‘yes Vs no’ language that provokes or inhibits the 3±∆ cycles of existence natural to the will of the cells, proteins and nucleic acids it communicates.

But how hormones provoke so many different reactions in a cell, being so simple? The process of course becomes much more complex in their details as any language with a few phonemes can create very complex memorial, sequential sentences through the repetition of a few basic patterns. So for example some hormones are substances that inhibit the inhibitors of those existential cycles. On the other hand many hormones are transported by proteins, ‘lineal killers’, which modify them or ‘motivate’ other messengers of the cell or network system that carry further the message.

Thus the second translation of the hormonal message into a singular product of a certain cell modifies the message that becomes specific for that cell or organ. This is especially certain among animals that, unlike democratic, ‘spatial’, reproductive plants and fungi with a few basic tissues and a lot of generic orders, are hierarchical, temporal, complex systems with 2 informative languages: submissive, slower chemical hormones and faster, nervous orders. So hormones are created by neuro-secretory cells, part of the higher plane of existence of neuronal networks, which pour them into the blood. And often they are accompanies by nervous messages, which they reinforce.

Thus, animal cells might recognize hormones because they know ‘behind’ their orders there is a very complex and powerful system: the nervous or blood system that has to be obeyed or else. Since the blood system sends leukocytes to kill rebel cells and the nervous system sends flows of electronic information to control them. It is the same reason that makes people to obey simple codes like those of traffic. We obey because we know that behind those codes there is a complex organic system, the state that will send its police, its ‘social leukocytes’ and punish us. So the question is how a cell knows? Because its DNA has a degree of memorial, instinctive perception; it is not a mechanism.

Despite all those elements of complexity, it is still possible to classify all hormones according to their spatial or informative, ‘universal’ morphology as ‘inhibitors or agents’ of the 3 basic cyclical actions of any organic system; since their morphology imitates or it is based in informative nucleotides, structural carbons and lineal, energetic shapes, whose functions are instinctively understood by all living forms as all animals understand black and white colors as relative information or Entropy, or ‘aaarg’, open vowels and bass sounds as ‘energetic anger’ and ‘u’ closed vowels and highly quantized informative frequencies as informative curiosity.

Thus, invariance of form between scales allows the existence of languages that are decoded as they respond to the Universal language of self-similar topologies of all forms of existence.

So according to duality, when hormones act as inhibitors, they have an energetic, lineal form; when they act as agents to foster those existential cycles they have a cyclical, informative shape.

Finally, according to the 3rd postulate of parallelism applied to ∆/∆+1 systems, their atomic components tend to be parallel to forms of the ∆+1 organ in which they accomplish their function. So when they act in the energetic zones of the cell or the macro-organism they are hyper abundant in oxygen, when they act in the informative brain they tend to be similar to nucleotide acids and when they act in the reproductive zones, they have carbon rings and vice versa.

In the graph, those simple rules explain the 3+2 main types of hormones in plants:

-Max. E: Cyclical Auxin, rich in carbons, increases the growth of shoots, the Entropy zone.

-Max.I: Cyclic, nitrogenized Cytokinines control the growth of roots, the brains of plants.

-Tiƒ≈Spe: Oxygenated, Gibberellic acid causes high growth in trunks and reproductive flowers.

Ultimately in as much as most hormones and enzymes act as inhibitors, they prove that the 3 energetic, informative and reproductive inner individual actions of organisms are the natural arrows of all organic systems, the will of any species, that have to be constantly inhibited by the neuronal-endocrine dual logic system of multicellular control. Since when that control disappears, naturally species try to reproduce. That is why cancers and any other form of cellular reproduction are so natural; because reproduction is the natural will of the fractal, organic Universe.

Finally, the duality of the TiƒxSpe systems and anti-systems with diffeomorphic, opposite coordinates creates inverse hormones that neutralize each other. So ‘energetic hormones’ inhibit ‘informative regions’ of the organism. For example, we can consider that form Vs anti-form duality, analyzing the inverse growth effect in informative roots and energetic leaves of the 2 previous hormones, auxins and purines. What we observe is a diffeomorphic, inverse dual TiƒxSpe process: the auxin that increases the growth of shoots inhibits the growth of inverse roots. And so auxins and quinines together work as a perfect dual system of growth control in the informative zone of the plant:

The root is a nitrogen-based informative system, which as all informative entities from neurons to worm holes, requires a lot of time and complex steps to reproduce its form. So quinines, its growth hormone, acts by parallelism, since it has 2 purine rings with nitrogens that positively induce the complex growth of roots made with nitrogens.

On the other hand, auxins have a structure that closely resembles the main nucleotide species, the purines. Yet, auxins ad to the hexagonal-pentagonal structure of purines a simple protein tail to move faster, and instead of nitrogens, auxins have 2 strong carbon rings. So it is basically a false purine with a far stronger body and a mobile tail that substitutes the quinine’s nitrogens and inhibits the root’s growth, because it cannot deliver the proper instructions.

On the other hand, the ever-growing shoots are the plant’s reproductive systems; whose natural will to grow is so strong that any hormone increases its reproductive rate unless it is inhibited.

If we study the energetic cycle of plants, again we observe that dual inverse control system: Abscisic acid (a lineal molecule with a lot of oxygen elements) provokes the fall of leaves, while the lineal gas ethane, CH2=CH2, increases by parallelism with the lineal CO2 molecule their respiration and metabolic rate. Both are very simple, energetic hormones, which resemble the 2 ‘energetic’ inverse products of breathing, oxygen and CO2, ‘reminding’ the plant that it has to accelerate or halt to its ‘death’ its production of those 2 products.

Recap. A language of information is always needed to create a complex organism. The simplest languages have 3 or 5 vowels, which represent energetic, informative and reproductive messages and its variations. They act by parallelism, since all systems and planes of an organism follow the ‘invariance’ of form and function. They also can deliver negative or positive orders depending of their parallelism or inversion with the form of the species they code. The language is always reproduced by the informative ‘upper-caste’ particles of the system, which delivers the orders to the rest of the elements. In plants, the language is a hormonal language with 3 main vowels, energetic auxin, informative cytokinines and reproductive Gibberellic acid.

Genetics.

An even more complex language is that of genetics, which we cannot study in depth due to restrictions of size of this lecture. Enough to say that in any efficient organism of multiple scales, the informative code, in this case the genes of biological super-organisms codify the multiple hierarchical levels of the organism besides the basic ternary code that constructs its simplest scales – in the case of life, amino acids. So according to the Fractal Principle there should be genetic languages with 3, 9, 27, 81 amino acid letters, which codify not only the proteins and cycles of the cell but those of the body. And so bigger sentences that group 9, 27, 81 amino acids should be coding ‘bigger’ actions and longer events within the complex cycles of the cell and beyond4.

All languages are built in this manner. For example, the human language and the musical language follow self-similar scales of ‘vowels’ and ‘consonants’, informative and energetic units that then form more complex ternary systems, informative names, reproductive actions or verbs and energetic objects, and then group in paragraphs and so on. Even the language of film can be understood in frames, motions, shots, sequences and scenes. In the same manner, ‘introns’, the so-called redundant DNA should have genetic meaning and codify the higher scales of organisms – its functional morphology.

Yet scientists believe in naïve realism. Only what they see with their instruments seems real; and so the obvious perceived genetic level is the fractal level of nucleotide triads that codify proteins. But those triads are united in groups of nine bases and so on, creating new, 3n, memorial planes that act as complex genetic forms of higher scales – an i-logic, scalar concept which today genetics finally accepts under the name of epigenetics. The enormous quantity of ‘redundant’ DNA and RNA that grows exponentially with the complexity of a multicellular organism is a clear proof of the correspondence between the complexity of the sentences of the language/instruction chains and the complexity and size of the form it codes.

A fractal equation derived from the concept of a network, which has ∑2 elements to control an ∑-body herd (and/or its self-similar ∑-limbs) defines in Theory of Information that the number of informative instructions needed to create a system grows exponentially, according to its number of dimensions or planes of existence: ±Est. For example, to make a car we need E material parts, defined easily in a bidimensional plane with E fractal units of information: the drawings of each part. But we need around E2 instructions to put those pieces together in a 3-dimensional form. Thus Est determines the total number of informative quanta needed to build up a hierarchical structure extended through ∆ planes of existence. To put a trivial example: Popular knowledge expresses that law in sentences like ‘an image is worth one thousand words’. Since to describe with lineal, one-dimensional words a 3 dimensional image, we need indeed, E3, 103 =1000 words. Thus E2 is the number of redundant genes we find in the DNA-RNA systems of a complex organism, because redundant, intronic DNA codifies the creation of the new level of cellular complexity, ∆=2, the multicellular organism.

Recap. The old belief that a mere ternary amino acid code that creates proteins regulates the entire multi-cellular organism is just another simplifying conclusion of the one-dimensional, metric paradigm. A multicellular organism is regulated by intron DNA and the collective language of hormones that communicate those cells.

Differentiation of animal cells. Electric Neurons: amoebae.

image031

The electric cell is the top predator animal cell, due to its Max.IxE force, with an overdeveloped E-membrane and Max.I-DNA content. It further differentiated into:

-Tiƒ≈Spe: Sensorial perceptive cells, which reproduce the external cycles of existence of other beings within its inner form.

– Max.E: Muscle cells that extend and implode its protein membranes.

– Max.I: Neuronal cells that process information in networks called brains.

Cells evolve ternary networks, which in its simplest fetal stage form 3×3 st-regions proper of all animal forms:

– Max.I: The ectoderm, which gives birth to the nervous, sensorial and skin systems of max. perception.

-Max.E: The endoderm, which becomes the digestive system and its derivatives such as smooth muscles, lungs, livers and glands.

– TiƒxSpe:Max. Reproduction. The mixed, mesoderm region, which subdivides in 3 sub-zones: the reproductive, blood and muscular systems.

Thus in its emergence from cellular to organic scale, the 3 topological regions of the cellular blastula suffer an inversion of form: the center gives birth to Entropy systems and the surface to information systems, while the middle region maintains its reproductive function.

Animal eukaryotic cells were moving species that had to react faster to the changing environment. So they developed a new, faster, nervous, informative, electric language that created a top predator cell thanks to its accelerated fractal action-reactions to information and Entropy: the electric cell, able to organize socially other cells into multicellular organisms.

The electric cell evolved from the ameba, a unicellular animal with membranes adapted to all morphologies that were shaped into arms to capture food, cilia to perceive information, tails to move and vesicles to expel unwanted Entropy and information, thanks to the use of heavy, metallic atoms, Na and K+ that deformed those membranes, making them highly flexible: the duality of positive and negative metallic atoms created a deformed wave that moved along the membrane of the neuron cell, as any fractal wave of codified information does, becoming a new language, faster than the chemical language, talked by all other cells.

The combination of both languages, in a hierarchical scale in which electric, fast impulses provoke the emission of hormonal, chemical messages at the end of a long membrane that those chemical cells understand, allowed nervous cells to maximize its TiƒxSpe force. Since now in the same relative ‘time’ that a small cell sends a message, the huge fractal action of the amoeboid neuron could send a wave of simultaneous messages through all its pseudopodia, coordinating at the same time the slow actions of a lot of enslaved smaller, chemical cells.

Thus the jump in size created a ‘higher informative class’ of macro-cells or brain of the animal that ruled a middle class of micro-cells or animal body, which together controlled an external Entropy territory. All those properties made the evolved, electric amoebae, the top predator cell in the Eukaryotic world. We still find those ancestral amoeboid cells in the most primitive multicellular sponges, evolved latter into the complex nervous cells of multi-cellular organisms.

Thus electric cells show Max. I x E force since:

– The nervous cell is able to control an enormous quantity of organic cycles with memories stored in its nucleus – since it is the cell with higher DNA density. So specialized neuro-secretory cells reproduce also the biggest number of chemical hormones.

– Such big volume of DNA implies also a great capacity to replicate its membrane, through micro Nyss cells that produce constantly membrane proteins, which are added to the external, ever changing morphological membrane.

Where did happen the transition from chemical to electric membranes? The evolutionary plan happens always in isolated environments in which mutational changes, fostered by the specific characteristics of the environment, take place without jeopardizing the survival of the species, due to the absence of top predators during the transitional, inefficient stage of the species that is ‘adapting its form’ at a faster palingenetic time-speed through specific differentiations, according to the i-logic evolutionary plan. The phenomenon is called evolutionary punctuation.

In the cell case, those requirements are found in shallow river mouths where changes in the salt concentration of water provoke by osmosis the constant expansion and implosion of the water content of cells and their membranes, bursting and killing ‘rigid cells’. So cells, in order to survive, managed to create new membranes and deformed them very fast, expanding and imploding its form. Then, those new top predator electric cells started a massive reproductive radiation, expanding in all seas, feeding and enslaving other cells. The subsequent combination of top predator electric cells with other varieties of chemical cells, differentiated and evolved the first ternary scale of simple organic macro-systems: sponges (max.E), hydras (max.Re) and worms (Max.I) with a growing number of cellular types.

Recap. Multicellular species were born when a new top predator, larger and faster, Max. TiƒxSpe, species, the nervous cell appeared, herding chemical cells and differentiating in 3 physiological cells in charge of future digestive, blood and nervous networks.

3×3+∆ dimensions: Embryology & Physiological networks.

We have described the 3×3+∆ dimensional tissues of living organisms in space. If we consider them in time, we observe a process of evolution that differentiate the original ideal spherical or spiraled st-point (seeds, cells, ovules) into complex morphological shapes, adapted to those inner and outer tissues. Thus living forms evolve and diversify, opening or invaginating their networks, organs and sensorial apertures to each specific ecosystem, which subsequently adapts the morphology of the cells and organs they control to the specific surfaces of their environments. So men, who exist on a planar surface, have a different morphology to the ideal spheres so common in water and space, which are 3-dimensional isomorphic ecosystems – as human evolution has adapted our networks and morphologies to the land-atmosphere environment.

In those different processes of ecosystemic adaptation the 3 dominant networks of living systems further quantize into secondary systems, departing from the 3 initial layers of cells. We can follow that process temporally in the evolution of the embryo that resumes the palingenetic evolution of life and spatially in the organic structure of living beings. It is the science of evol=devol that relates both phases of animal evolution, establishing a parallel correspondence between the spatial location of a tissue at birth and its functional evolution into I, e and Tiƒ≈Spe tissues. Thus according to their st-location the Tiƒ-ectoderm evolves into informative tissues and networks; the Tiƒ≈Spe mesoderm into reproductive tissues and networks and the E-endoderm into energetic ones:

Max.I: Ectoderm: the 3 informative sub-systems.

The information network derived from the external ectoderm, dominated by neuronal cells, evolves and differentiates according to the Fractal Principle into:

– E-endocrine systems, with internal neurosecretory cells that control internal, cellular information through chemical hormones.

-Tiƒ≈Spe: nervous systems that control and replicate in a neuronal brain with the electric language all other functions and forms of the body.

I: Skin systems and outer senses, which are the openings to the world of the nervous system through which the organism emits or absorbs Entropy and information, communicating with the ∆+1 ecosystem. Those senses specialize in perceiving the external, energetic and informative cycles of the beings that share the ecosystem of the organism, duplicating them in a series of fractal, quantized, reduced images, with different languages.

The existence of multiple senses justifies the linguistic method of perception in a Universe of ‘multiple spaces-times and points of view’, where each entity tries to perceive as many parallel worlds coded in different languages. Thus the linguistic/multiple Universe gives birth to a multiplicity of senses and perspectives and defines a higher truth as a sum of perspectives casted on a certain system – as each point of view will create a self-similar image of the Universe, and so only by comparing and adding all those self-similar images we can obtain a more complex, kaleidoscopic image of the whole.

In living beings to accomplish the higher truth of each form through the ‘linguistic method’ sensorial languages multiply the perspectives on the cycle or form observed, extracting their existential properties, its form, density, force, etc.

Thus senses and languages differentiated also along an E<=>I arrow from pure spatial senses (eyes) to the most complex, temporal senses (ears), defining an evolutionary arrow of increasing complexity in their capacity to gather information, which often defined the survival capacity of the species, as senses are the key to interpret correctly the destructive or creative actions-reactions of all other beings. So from an initial simple phototropic stain, eyes, ears, antennas and mouths have multiplied, close to the inner, neuronal informative brain that processes their information, forming together a ‘head’.

E: Endoderm: the 3 energetic sub-systems.

Max. E: The internal endoderm. Originally populated by wandering amoebocytes and glandular cells that digested food, the ‘Entropy hole’ of the first animals, sponges and hydras, invaginated forming the coelom between the endoderm and mesoderm that subdivides further into the 3 cavities of animal life: the digestive system, the breathing system and the heart cavity. The 2 first cavities evolved, surrounded by endoderm cells into 3 subsystems:

– Max. E: The breathing system gathers the smallest Entropy quanta, oxygen.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: The digestive system gathers bigger food quanta, differentiated morphologically in 3 new subsystems with linear, wave-like and cyclical components:

Entropy network: max. E: linear intestine <stomach: elliptic TiƒxSpe > sensorial, cyclical Mouth: Max.I

– Max.I: Glandular tissue: It forms organs dependent on the digestive system (liver, digestive organs, kidneys), that process their products.

Tiƒ≈Spe: Mesoderm: the 3+(∆+1) reproductive systems.

The 3rd coelom cavity, the heart, surrounded by mesoderm tissue, invaginates further into very thin vessels, created with striated muscles, densely populated by the original wandering amoebocytes reconverted now into leucocytes. In the blood networks the other 2 systems merge and pour their products: quanta of Entropy, oxygen and food; and quanta of information, hormones, which the system takes to each cell. The blood systems mixes both Entropy and information quanta. Thus, it is also the reproductive system by excellence with maximal contact with the intermediate region’s secondary tissues evolved from the mesoderm:

– Max. E: The skeleton: It sustains the system and reproduces blood cells.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Muscular tissue: The most resistant electric cells form a muscle dual negative-positive symmetric, spatial system with myosin cells that control the elongation and shortening of membranes.

– Max.I: The blood and tegumentary system that prolongs the blood network between cells.

– ∆+1: Yet the fundamental reproductive tissue is the sexual, glandular tissue, that reproduces the organism beyond the cellular scale and further differentiates into the basic E=male Vs. I=female duality of ‘energetic and informative subspecies’.

Those 3×3+∆ standard systems and tissues, differentiated from the initial 3-layers of the embryo, define complex living organisms. Yet those organisms exist also in an external world where they become individual quanta, performing external cycles of Entropy, reproduction and information, parallel to those internal cycles performed by its cells and fractal networks. So all organisms have also an external, vital territory within its ecosystem to provide for their internal ‘mirror’ networks.

Recap. The ectoderm, endoderm and mesoderm topologies of the embryo, guided by top predator nervous cells differentiated into the e-TiƒxSpe-I main systems of the adult organism.

Creation of a 3×3+∆ decametric scale of cells and tissues.

Such processes of cellular diversification, guided by the informative elements of the system (frequencies, genes, memes, etc.) happen in all systems of space-time that differentiate according to the ternary method its relative fractal cells in 2×2 complementary systems or 3×3 organic systems (particles in the atomic nucleus, vowels in languages, etc.).

In this manner simplex systems evolve into complex ones; complementary dual systems become ternary, organic systems; bidimensional systems becoming 4-dimensional systems and ternary systems become 3×3+∆ systems, emerging into a new scale. And this process takes place in time through 3 ages or horizons that complete the evolutionary process.

In life this happened through speciation of cellular languages evolved from 1 to 3->5->7->9 cells in the 3 time horizons of all TiƒxSpe cycles, latter re-ordered in space in 3 e-TiƒxSpe-I types of organisms.

Since morphologic differentiation occurs only among the top predator, informative organisms of any ecosystem, we could establish a comparative homology between many of those processes. In the biological scale, it happened with animal cells; then with networks of cells in complex vertebrates; and finally with verbal sounds among human beings – a new language which, unlike neuronal impulses, could breach the discontinuities of air-space between individual humans, creating a higher scale of social, living networks, cultures and civilizations. Then again, those differentiations happened in the memetic systems of the dominant, technological civilizations that created the Financial-military-industrial complex and its metal-memes of informative money, energetic weapons and reproductive, organic machines… Since evolution is a morphological game that didn’t stop with the summit of carbonlife man, but now continues in the new species of complex metal atoms to which humans are transferring their form.

Let us see the first of those ternary scales – animal cells evolved in time to analyze then the 3 ‘animal phyla’ they created in space:

The 1st scale: from 1 to 3±∆ electric cells.

-∆-1:Electric wandering amoeba, differentiated in 3±∆ subspecies:

– Max. E: Muscular, myosin cells that maximize the flexible properties of the membrane.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Sensorial cells that reproduce their external cycles of existence with their mimetic forms.

– Max.I: Informative, neuronal cells.

-∆+1: Those 3±∆ specialized types of electric cells, multiplied and evolved socially into dense tissues and networks in which one of them is dominant: the blood vessels dominated by wandering amoebocytes; the muscular tissue dominated by the myosin-actin inverse lineal proteins; the senses dominated by sensorial cells and the brain, dominated by neurons, which act as the communicative consciousness of all other systems (∆+1). They form the 3+∆ physiological networks that defined the specific space-time equation of all complex multicellular animals:

E: ∑ amoebocytes & Blood Systems <Muscular cells > ∑ sensorial & nervous system: I.

From 3±∆ to 5±i cells.

In the next stage of cellular differentiation the 3±∆ electric cells, tissues and networks added slave chemical cells that stretched their Entropy and information limits:

The sponge, the first animal phyla, dominated by wondering amoebocytes adds 2 slave cells that increased the TiƒxSpe force of the energetic membrane and the informative singularity:

– Max. E: Epithelial cells of max. energetic strength made with proteins and incrusted with heavier non-organic atoms that protect the organic system, through a shielded external membrane. Later on in more complex organisms those cells evolved into inner bones and breathing systems.

– Max. E x I: Glandular cells able to reproduce specialized Entropy and informative substances necessary to the other cells that multiplied in the intermediate st-region of the body.

That pentagram of 3±∆ differentiated electric cells and 2 basic slave cells, quantified in social groups, shape the 5 main organic systems of animal bodies:

  1. a) Max.E organs: Membranes made mainly of epithelial cells that create the skin, the discontinuity between the st-point and the external world and the digestive system…
  2. e) E: Muscular systems based on electric myosin cells that turn Entropy into movement.
  3. i) Tiƒ≈Spe: Wondering amoebocytes reign as leucocytes on the blood networks.
  4. o) Tiƒ≈Spe: Internal glands, attached to the blood, reproductive and digestive, Entropy networks that reproduce the substances, which the organic system needs.
  5. u) I: Sensorial organs based in electric cells that perceive information about the cyclical actions of the outer world and translate it into mental images. They will guide the actions of…

∆+1 =Aeiou) Max.I: Neuronal brains that control the entire organism as the consciousness of the system, according to the existential actions those senses observe in the external world.

Thus in living beings as in any universal system, time dominates space and so the informative, controlling orders go from sensorial to energetic cells, shaping the outer, muscular movements: I>E.

Those 5+1 cells and 5+1 basic organs are present in all forms of multicellular life since they are closely related to the 4 + ∆-generational cycles of exi=stence, each one dominated by one type of cell and organ: Max. E, digestive organs and cells absorb Entropy; E, muscles that emit Entropy; Tiƒ≈Spe, blood networks and glands that reproduce the system; I-senses that absorb information and Max. I brains that emit information and control all other cycles, perceiving the entire organism as an existential whole, living the entire generational cycle of the organism.

It is for that reason that we find also 5 vowels in human languages, 5 lines in the musical pentagram, 5 cells and types of tissue in the simplest organisms, etc.

Decametric scale: invaginations and ∆+1 excretions.

Any organism is an inner st-world that exists in an external ∆+1 ecosystem developing inner and outer cycles of recollection of Entropy and information. So the final diversification occurs along the inner-outer duality of the organism in order to accomplish those 2 x 5 inner and outer cycles. Now the pentagram evolves into 9+1 cells and types of organic tissues that stretch again the cellular field according to that inverse symmetry between the external and internal world, as cellular tissues invaginate or eject their cells perpendicularly in the height dimension of evolution:

– Thus inner skeletal and outer skin cells differentiate the structural tissues of sustain.

– Membrane cells differentiate into inner blood and outer lung cells that process internal and external Entropy.

– Internal, creative glands and external, destructive urticaria cells reproduce informative and energetic substances.

Digestive and muscular cells create inner and outer motions.

External sensorial cells process external information.

– Internal neurons control the internal information of the organism with the electric and chemical language provided by hormonal, internal neuro-secretory cells, dominating all cells.

The result is the creation of 9+1 types of tissues that are found in the most complex animal forms of life and become the 9+1 standard ‘systems’ of the most complex living organisms:

The digestive and muscle system, the skeleton and tegumentary system, the blood and breathing system, the reproductive and excretory system, the endocrine system and the nervous system, the 10th system that controls the entire organism duplicating in the brain all other organic functions it directs becoming the ∆+1 scale that puts together the organic being.

Recap. The 9+1 physiological systems and tissues of an organism are born from the 3×3+(∆+1) 3 horizons of differentiation of its cells.

 

VII. EVOLUTIONARY PUNCTUATION. ANIMAL PHYLA

image035

The Hydra is a new living phylum with 5+2 cells distributed in 3 regions, common to all palingenetic, fetal forms:

– Max. E: The ectoderm is the external, energetic membrane with the hardest cells: the hard epithelial and aggressive urticant cells that explode its poisonous cilia and the interstitial cells that ensure its continuous isolation.

– Max.I: The mesoderm is the informative region, with nervous and sensorial cells.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: The endoderm is the intermediate region with glandular cells that digest food quanta, entering through the mouth.

Network evolution: bodies, brains & reproductive systems.

It is then evident that the evolution of animal life creates new phyla, based on the capacity of the new species to accomplish their external cyclical actions on their territory, thanks to the evolution of their internal and external networks.

The interaction between those 2 levels, the ∆-1 level of physiological networks and the ∆+1 level of ecosystemic territories determine the existence of most organisms. So the evolution of life on Earth, externally observed in the ecosystems, territories and relationships of living animals, which depend ultimately on their capacity to handle temporal Entropy coming from light, is caused internally by the evolution of those 3 types of organs and internal networks: reproductive, genetic organs; informative, brain organs and energetic, body organs.

When one of those organs evolves, improving its capacity to handle Entropy or information coming from the ecosystem, a fundamental differentiation of species occurs. And we can consider the evolution of the main phyla of animal life in a deconstructed manner, as a process that evolves sequentially those 3 types of organs:

The evolution of those three organs triggers the biological radiation of a new phylum that preys on less efficient forms of organic life. The process is very fast, as time can change its rhythms and adapt to the best strategy of survival, as palingenesis shows. It is called Evolutionary Punctuation: when a new species with better Entropy or informative organs appears, it feeds on other species and reproduces massively causing the extinction of the previous top predator species, till it reaches a trophic balance with those victims. It is the essence of Darwinian evolution: ‘evolve and multiply’. We can find such catastrophic evolution in many geological and organic ages of the Earth: First animals displaced plants because they evolved better informative networks. Plants could only gather Entropy from light. Animals could ‘see’ light and get information about their environment, and act-react faster. They used plants as food. Then animals ‘radiated’ (multiplied) all over the Earth and diversified. And each new phylum with improved networks displaced the previous ones. Thus once more, the evolution in time of living organisms and its spatial structure are intimately related.

Thus, the first ternary evolution of multicellular life created 3 phyla of increasing tissue complexity that completed the evolution of animals from the ∆-1 cellular tissue to the ∆-network scale:

-Max. E: The simplest animal organic systems, sponges and porifera, which are basically a digestive system.

-Tiƒ≈Spe: The balanced animal organic systems, the coelenterates such as the hydra, which maximize its reproduction through the split of its cells.

– Max.I: Worms that add informative cells and differentiate clearly its 3 physiological networks.

They were the first of many ternary E-TiƒxSpe-I rhythms of creation in the animal kingdom that evolve from energetic, to reproductive to informative sub-species, through the 3 horizons of any phylum, with a parallel improvement of the 3 network systems of the animal, which from now on will be the higher ‘scale’ of existence to which all cells become submissive.

Since as the new animal forms multiplied, their informative nervous networks controlled a growing number of cells through their fractal, simultaneous actions; and so they also grew in spatial size, multiplying their TiƒxSpe force. It means they had to re-organize those cells beyond their initial division in simple tissues, creating specialized ‘energetic, informative and reproductive networks’.

It will be the definitive jump from the state of ‘cellular herd’ to the state of ‘organism’, the 3rd age of a social form that evolves from a ∆-1:∑E horizon of individual ‘Entropy quanta’ to the balanced herd that fluctuates between ‘wave and particle’ state to the informative state of a tightly packed organism which those networks maintain together in minimal space. And so from then on evolution will be no longer differential evolution of cells but differential evolution of networks…

Let us see now in detail those main phyla differentiations.

Sponge vs. Hydra: cyclical-lineal digestive networks.

The evolution of multicellular organisms started with the creation of social, digestive, energetic tracts made of the pentagram basic cells that came together to improve the cyclical fractal actions of the group. The first of those organisms was the sponge, the first animal phylum that emerges from the previous cellular scale with 5 types of cells:

-Max. E: The sponge has flattened epithelial cells and hollow pore cells, which are external, membrane cells differentiated by their inner and outer location. They are the primitive versions of skins and breathing systems.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Mesenchyme cells that secrete siliceous spicule, strengthening the walls of the sponge. They are the primitive version of glandular cells.

– Max.I: Central top predator cells: Wandering amoebocytes that herd food for the five types of cells, moving around between the other cells to capture the particles entering the hollows of the spherical sponge; and collar cells that sense water flows, beating their flagella to produce a flow of water that introduces food in the sponge. They are the primitive versions of brain and sensorial cells.

Further on, we differentiate in the sponge 3 st-regions according to those 2-1-2 kind of cells: the external membrane of hard cells; the inner, glandular, intermediate region that reproduces the specific substances of the sponge and the central hole where informative cells wander. The 3 regions create the 3±∆ vital cycles of the sponge thanks to those 5 cells:

– Max. E: The sponge feeds on Entropy quanta that enter its central hollow.

– Max.I: It perceives those quanta as its collar cells sense the water flows.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: It reproduces new cells through its glandular systems.

-S: It keeps together those cells in social groups thanks to the epithelial cells of the membrane that maintain a rigid, enveloping structure.

– SE<=>S2I: And so the sponge exists as a whole being controlled by the wandering amoebocytes, the dominant, informative cells that use the sponge as their territorial body, their vital space.

Those amoebas will be also the dominant cells of the next animal phylum, Coelenterata (hydras, jellyfishes), evolved already into electric cells, and hence connected into the first ‘nervous tissue’. So they will become the ‘∆+1’, existential system where the consciousness of animal organisms as a whole exists.

The 7 cells of hydra and their networks.

Those hydras add 2 new cellular, energetic specializations, extending morphologically the TiƒxSpe force interval of animal life, from 5 to 7 cells:

A): MAX. E: The epithelial cell. A still harder, internal tissue that maintains the rigid structure of the animal and will evolve into armors and bones. And…

  1. ei) TiƒxSpe: The urticant cell, an external, energetic differentiation of the reproductive, internal glandular cell, which produces poisonous substances to defend the animal.

Both are created through the inversion of directionality of its twin cells: the internal glandular cell becomes now an external form, and the external epithelial cell becomes an internal cell.

Those 2 final tones of specialized energetic cells make the hydra a natural born top, lineal predator, the next evolutionary step that inverts its form from a cyclical sponge to a lineal, reproductive body. Thus the complexity of the Hydra grows, shaping definitely the 3 E-TiƒxSpe-I organic st-regions common to all living beings (mesoderm, endoderm and ectoderm), which will vary in morphology and complexity but not in their ternary functions.

Further on coelenterates bring to animal life the maximization of its reproductive systems. Both the sponge and the Hydra lack a specialized blood, hormonal system, so its reproduction is far simpler than in evolved organisms: each cell is in itself a ‘genetic mother-cell’, which stores the information of the entire organism. This implies a limit to their informative evolution, as cells have to keep an excess of redundant information, according to the E∆=2 law that increases geometrically the number of genetic instructions needed to create the new ∆=2 multicellular plane of existence. On the other hand, it makes easier reproduction: any section of the Hydra can create a new animal. The result is that the arms of the hydra, where most sensorial cells are, break away easily, moving with the streams of water, reproducing new hydras all over the world. Yet some tentacles fail to reproduce evolving instead into planarians, the 1st worms, which will acquire 2 new informative cells, completing the 9+1 decametric scale; and developing fully the 3 physiological networks of complex animal life.

Worm: 1st animal: mobility, senses, 4-D, networks.

Thus, the next step in the evolution of life, after the hydra develops 2 new energetic cells, will be the evolution of 2 new informative cells. They will create a new phylum, the worm:

Visual, spatial cells that perceive light-space.

Temporal, auditory cells that perceive the sound waves and informative languages of animal life.

Those 9 cells complete the differentiation of cellular species that a growing ∆+1 neuronal, inner center – the brain – elaborates as the consciousness of ‘the whole’ increasing ever since its size till acquiring the weight of the human being.

Those informative cells were necessary to the new environment of planarians, which are in constant movement; hence have to orientate themselves in the ocean flows in search of Entropy. Since the change from stillness to movement is a fundamental change for life beings, which definitively transform all its elements to the properties of animal life:

The new informative cells create new apertures, the senses, that gather in the frontal zone of movement, the relative height of the worm, creating ‘heads’ that will also control the Entropy apertures of the body, splitting clearly the organism in an energetic, moving body and a sensorial head, which controls the information and Entropy of that body.

– Animals become bilateral in order to dominate the 2 directions of its initial bidimensional planar form: a hierarchical, temporal dimension from the future informative head to the past, energetic tail in which they orientate their organic, inner, evolutionary morphology and a perpendicular, parallel, equal, repetitive, ‘present’ spatial dimension, from left to right in which they orientate their reproductive, fractal, cellular ‘fat’ growth.

So embryo worms develop 2 bilateral cavities or ‘coeloms’, latter evolved in dual organs, which in the head will observe the 2 directions of their spatial field: 2 eyes, 2 ears, etc. – while in the body, inner organs will also double, creating in more evolved phyla a certain TiƒxSpe asymmetry with slightly more ‘energetic’ and ‘informative’ sides. So the heart will have an explosive and implosive region; sexual organs will become I-feminine and E-masculine; the brain regions will specialize in spatial and informative tasks; some crabs will develop energetic and manipulative arms.

Thus the 1st worm, the planarian, created a diffeomorphic bidimensional structure with 2 TiƒxSpe perpendicular planes that all future animals will imitate.

image038The worm is the 1st network animal, made of a lineal wave of parallel organic spheres, each one a st-point with 3±∆ dual networks: The nervous, blood and digestive/excretory systems, which accomplish the emission and absorption of informative, reproductive and energetic cycles.

In the graph we study the inner structure of the worm, because it shows already some of the dualities, fractal strategies and future arrows of life evolution that will act on different phyla to diversify and evolve their species:

– The worm is divided in fractal units, setting up a basic duality of living beings that sometimes are ‘herds’ of individual organs, multi-eyes, multi-bodies and sometimes fusion all parts into a whole.

– It shows perfectly differentiated the 3 physiological networks/ dimensions, proper of all advanced organisms that mimic the 3 regions of a st-point:

E: The worm absorbs Entropy through the digestive network and emits it through the excretory system; which in the worm occupied the original endodermic, central singularity. But as animals evolve informatively as chordates, the center will be finally occupied by the nervous, informative system as in any other st-point.

I: The worm absorbs information through the senses and emits it through the nervous system. The informative brain and nervous system directs the entire organism and unifies its cellular quanta as a whole. The nervous system further differentiates into the sensorial, nervous and neuro-secretory systems, when the planarian adds eyes and ear systems that represent a jump in complexity over the informative systems of the hydra. It defines also a head in the dominant, temporal dimensionality of movement. In the planarian is still length, which will rise till reaching the height of man.

     –Tiƒ≈Spe: The intermediate region of the worm is controlled by the blood system, the fundamental dual transport system of the worm, where the neuro-endocrine glands dependent on the informative system, pour their reproductive hormones while the Entropy/digestive system pours its organic food.

The worm represents a jump of complexity in transport systems as it uses for the first time, organometallic molecules (hemoglobin) to harness oxygen Entropy and quantizes the blood network, which now arrives to cells far away from the digestive hollow. So worms can grow in size and Entropy power respect to the previous coelenterates. Now Entropy and information combine together on organs and glands dependent on the blood system.

The most important ones will be the new reproductive, specialized sexual glands, differentiated into dual, female and male sexual organs that make worms, hermaphrodite systems. Sexual organs again represent a fractal jump in the evolution of life. Since now, unlike in hydras, single specialized sexual organs will reproduce the living animal, increasing the sophistication of the process and liberating from those complex tasks all the other cells, which can specialize further.

Still many worms can reproduce by both systems: segmentation and sexual reproduction, which in new phyla will become the only form of reproduction, splitting organisms in 2 different sexual genders, the male and the female.

From worms to vertebrates: 3±∆ ages of fractal integration.

The evolution of worms into vertebrates is a long process of 3+∆ phyla differentiations based on:

– E: Spatial, I-radial or E-bilateral symmetry.

– ∑ Re: Fractal numbers that foster hierarchical e-TiƒxSpe-I segmentation and differentiate big unitary animals and small animals made of fractal parts.

– I: A constant increase of dimensional height.

– +∆: The evolution of its 3x 3+(∆+1) physiological networks.

The first massive differentiation will take place in the Cambrian age, according to the Black Hole paradox that evolves faster ‘smaller forms, denser in information’ than bigger, spatial forms. Thus in the Cambrian age most phyla evolved from small trochophores of ancestral flatworms that gave birth to new phyla during its ‘palingenetic larva, conception stage’, according to the Fractal Principle:

So we can first differentiate the worm phylum into 3 fundamental phyla with intermediate forms:

– Max. E: Platyhelminthes: the simplest worms are flat, bidimensional planarians without blood systems that still require all cells to be close to the skin surface of the animal to exchange oxygen with the air.

– Max.I: Nematoda or round worms, which develop a dimension of height as they add the blood system with its fine vessels that carry Entropy to each fractal cell.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Max. ∑: Annelida or ring worms, which reproduced a micro-worm unit, as crystals do, into a series of fractal pieces, growing enormously in size. Thus Annelida became the worms with higher TiƒxSpe force radiating and diversifying in 3 sub-classes according to its territorial environments:

– Max. E: Polychaeta or marine worms.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Hirudinea, living mainly in shallow or fresh waters. They are leeches that feed on blood and might in their initial forms feed on waters rich in metal, creating the first blood systems.

– Max.I: Oligochaeta, terrestrial worms that evolve further due to the new challenges imposed by the ground environment.

Annelids, the dominant phyla, diversified and multiplied into multiple types of bilateral animals, with a central cavity and 2 coeloms that evolved further its dual organs and 3x 3+(∆+1) network systems. The first of those differentiations gave birth to the main animal phyla that will dominate the following life ages of the planet in 3±∆ periods, which took place according to ternary differentiation, as evolution puts together fractal ‘organic’ units into single unified systems:

     – (∆-1): The worm’s body is divided in fractal elements which are still independent elements with entire 3 functional sub-systems: each section has 2 reproductive organs, 2 nervous ganglia, a digestive tract and excretory anus and 2 upper blood nodes.

– Max. 3: Arthropods keep the earlier segmentation of annelids, but they organize those fractal segments into 3 differentiated zones, with several independent sections that go from 3 to 21 parts:

A sensorial, informative head (Max.I); a central thorax with moving limbs and wings (max. E) and an abdominal region with the glandular, digestive and reproductive systems (max. Tiƒ≈Spe).

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Mollusks have balanced, hierarchical, single organs. As the 3 physiological networks evolve and become quantized to reach each cell, the different sections of the I-head, e-thorax and TiƒxSpe-abdomen fusion together. Now the quantification process is transferred to the ends of those physiological networks: axons, blood vessels and digestive tracts become thinner to improve their control of individual cells.

– Max.Informative Evolution: Echinodermata. Echinoderms fusion those organs into single systems in the stillness of the marine platform, where they became the most successful forms.

– ∆+1: Chordates: vertebrates. Echinoderms in its larva, moving stage, according to the Worm Hole paradox, give origin to chordates, the 1st vertebrates. In both phyla the small organs of each arthropod’s section fusion into single, continuous big organs, thanks to the integrated evolution of the informative nervous system that aggregates the individual cellular quanta into those specialized organs. So the multiple eyes of insects become a single eye; its multiple hearts a single one, etc.

Though all those phyla appeared already in the Cambrian their sequential dominance on the Earth is parallel to those previous 3±∆ ages, since the simplest forms, arthropods and mollusks, reach first the summit of their evolution (Max. E=Min.i), while complex chordates took a long time to reach its evolutionary height and became dominant latter as fishes and reptiles.

Recap. The differentiation of cells into 3-5-9 forms allowed the creation of complex multi-cellular organisms, first dominant in digestive systems (sponges), then in reproductive systems (Hydra) and finally in informative systems (worms). From the worm on, all living animals will be defined as st- points with 3 inner networks/dimensions, which will create in the outside world 3±∆ cyclical actions, designing an external territory also with 3 networks/dimensions.

Arthropods. The new social scale of superorganisms.
image039image042

On the center, we see the 3 ages of an insect’s metamorphosis from larva to chrysalis to adult. They differentiate in ‘3 lives’ the existence of most insects that develop sequentially their 3 main organic regions and networks during each of those live.

On the left, according to TiƒxSpe duality, the final results of those 3 temporal ages are the 3 regions of a topological insect:

-E: The digestive and dual respiratory systems, dominant in the larva, are the energetic networks, located in the center of the body, shaped as a spiral.

– I: In the belly we find the finest and more quantized nervous informative network, developed during the chrysalis life.

Tiƒ≈Spe: Finally, the reproductive, hormonal network, ex i, pours into the blood system, which dominates the 3rd life of the insect, in the external world.

On the right, the social classes of insects, like those of a human society, correspond to the 3 organic function of a new scale of existence, the superorganisms of insects, its ∆+1 system: Termites have an informative brain, the pheromonal queen (c); a re=productive class of workers, which produce the structures that create the ant-hill (a) and an Entropy class (b), the drones and soldiers, that have a linear, spatial morphology.

The first arthropods, derived from Annelida were probably trilobites, which protected their bodies and heads with external hard shells. Trilobites increased their energetic force, maximizing the strength of its membranes. They probably responded to the increase of TiƒxSpe force caused by visual cephalopods, which maximized their informative organs. And so the game of life raised its fractal force, balancing again the top reproductive body membrane and top informative, mind singularity.

Today, according to duality and the Fractal Principle, we differentiate arthropods in sea animals (the most efficient of which are crustaceans) and land animals, which became dominant and evolved towards new informative species as all air or land forms did in a light-friendly environment. So again we differentiate them in 3 basic forms:

– Max. E: Myryapoda, with max. body development and multiple feet.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Arachnida, the balanced species.

– Max.I: Insecta, the informative class with max. brain development, which are still the most successful animals on this planet in the microscopic level of chemical life. Since they completed the organic evolution of chemical animals towards its most perfect form in 3 evolutionary phases.

Max. E: The evolution of energetic systems brought about the first flying animals that colonized a new environment.

Today flying insects still account for 1/2 of all animal classes. They made energetic networks the center of its body, developing on their middle region a highly efficient muscle and blood systems, with 2×3 wings and legs.

Tiƒ≈Spe: The second evolutionary jump occurred in their reproductive systems.

Insects learnt how to accelerate temporal evolution in a still, temporal state (Min.E=Max.I), changing from energetic, lineal larva to chrysalis that emerged as complex insects with highly developed informative heads and energetic wings. Nowadays 90% of the surviving insects come from species that evolved its generational cycle, dividing it further into 3 evolutionary phases that shape the metamorphosis cycle:

– Max. E: Insects live their youth as an energetic, lineal larva that merely feeds and grows in size. A larva is a sort of moving egg that gathers vitellus in 3 sub-ages in which it changes 3 times its skin as it grows in size. In this phase the insect develops mainly its abdominal, glandular systems that will produce the enzymes needed for its first metamorphic change into a:

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Chrysalis. The intermediate Chrysalis age is a ‘frozen’ vision of the most surprising facts of palingenetic evolution and inverse differentiation: In an ever moving Universe, external, spatial immobility triggers internal change in the speed of informative evolution, as outer movement is transferred to inner cells, rich in enzymes that become the dominant cells of each section of the adult insect, moving and reorganizing their tissues through a series of inversions and evolutions of its morphology. So central tissue ex-vaginates as wings or legs, etc.

A similar inversion happened when mobile trochophores in their larva transition became still echinoderms, which evolved and differentiated further, causing the explosion of chordate’s phyla that happened in the Cambrian.

In those trochophore embryos, inner dominant cells also reorganize the different tissues, placing the other cells at will. So chrysalis evolved the middle thorax section and brain systems, becoming:

– Tiƒ: A hard insect with Max.IxE force (a harder E-exoskeleton and a far more developed Tiƒ-brain) that will live the 3 usual phases of life.

The third mutational age of insects was informative:

Insects learnt to communicate socially through chemical, pheromonal messages, giving origin to ants and bees, the dominant ground and air modern insect species. It was again an evolution departing from very small forms, according to the Black Hole Paradox. Today the smallest organism is an ant that weights 1011 times less than an elephant, the magic fractal number, St, between 2 scales of existence, which is also the difference of weight between the smallest and biggest particle of the physical world. So the fractal limits of ‘informative scalar growth’ have been reached in both, the physical and living realms.

It is worth to notice that insects have not evolved further in the last 100 million years, but are still the most successful chemical beings. Because the game is fractal and so it always has an evolutionary limit based on its ternary ages. For that reason, once reached the 3rd formal age of Max.Information only social evolution into a new macro-organic plane of existence can improve the survival of a species. It is what happened with insects that became super-organisms called anthills. And so ants became the most successful animals of the chemical world as men will be in the electronic world, due to the fact that they act as a simultaneous, present form, sum of all the fractal actions of the herd, guided by their informative common pheromonal language, spoken by the ‘queen-brain’ of the anthill. It is also worth to notice that in both realms – the world of chemical insects and the world of electronic humans -we find the same 3 organic classes proper of any Universal system.

Recap. Insects became the most successful chemical species, when they evolved into social super-organisms, with the informative ant-queen brain, which controls with pheromones the workers that reproduce all the elements of the anthill and the energetic warriors that defend it.

Mollusks, the first eyes.

The next successful phylum, mollusks also suffered a ternary differentiation. Thus mollusks today are classified into 3 classes:

Maximal Entropy: Lamellibranchiate (which are big stomachs).

Balanced forms: Gastropoda.

Max.Information: Cephalopods, which developed the first eyes.

Though there were other primitive mollusks, today almost all of them belong to those 3 species. It proves that even though a ∆-system essays many variations, the 3 sub-classes of max. Entropy, Max.Information and max. reproduction survive better; because any environment allows those 3 classes to find specialized econiches in which to maximize their existence and resources.

The most successful of all gastropod were again the informative class, cephalopods, the first living animals with complex eyes. If we observe animal life, the key to its evolution is the improvement of its virtual worlds, of its informative organs:

In the first forms of life, perception was chemical, olfactory based in slow, short-range molecular quanta; until the first eyes appeared, inaugurating a new virtual world, made of smaller, speedy photons that create long range, detailed light images, making cephalopods act-react faster and farther than any other animal.

Squids were born in the abyssal ocean ecosystem, where still the biggest squids exist (over 10 meters long). It is the kingdom of bioluminescence – a new language based in the Universal code of colors; they were the first to interpret. For example, when a squid becomes red, the color of Entropy, it means it is angry. Those first primitive cellular eyes had to look hard to see their environment and the prey they sought. When they came up to the surface they saw even more and preyed on blind, energetic phyla. Today squids are still among the most intelligent animals, showing some self-consciousness.

The squid is the first eye-world; a new informative language that will completely changes the stakes of living organisms. The organs of perception of the squid, the eyes, were a new Top Predator language, superior to olfactory organs, both in detail and range. The effect of that linguistic superiority was the massive radiation of squids and the parallel extinction of perhaps 90% of the smelling species of the Cambrian that became their preys.

Those eyes enabled cephalopods to become the masters of their Universe, building all their other organs around their superior organ of perception: their tentacles became hands for the eye; the body became a canvass that changed color to interpret the new language.

Cephalopods also caused the arrival of exoskeletons in a classic process of action-reaction; only those olfactory animals with external protection (Max.E) could survive the faster informative eye of the hunter (Max.I). Thus the Cambrian holocaust also diversified life.

Those cephalopods with eyes became top predators in the Ordovician age, the age of squids. In this manner chemical perception left way to light and sound perception that developed highly sophisticated neuronal cells, which reach 2 meters in some squids.

Yet, when vertebrate life begun the ‘hard shells’ of some echinoderms sustained those long neurons, protecting them and allowing further quantification. So an energetic top predator found a cyclical protective form, in a dual game of evolution of prey and predators that will be carried till humans appear and beyond through the evolution of weapons and shields.

Recap. Cephalopods raised the stakes of the game of existence, of survival and extinction, as they imposed a faster speed of action-reaction, and a bigger spatial size, hunting in herds communicated through visual body languages.

Echinoderms and Chordates. Evolution of vertebrates.

Echinoderms, like ancestral cephalopodan, lived in abyssal regions originally fixed to the ground, in an ‘informative environment’ based in stillness with a lot of ‘free time’ to evolve further, as squids did in abyssal quiet regions or monkeys will do latter in quiet trees. Echinoderms became informative top predators because they evolved 2 new TiƒxSpe characters as ‘still’, temporal forms:

– Max.I: Radial symmetries, like in the pentagonal starfish, which fostered the development of a better neural system with a central informative singularity to coordinate the 5 radial nerves.

– Max. E: The first inner bones, to sustain their complex form.

Thus echinoderm increased their TiƒxSpe force, evolving into the first vertebrates: Chordates were probably born, according to the Black Hole paradox, due to a palingenetic error, when echinoderms remained in their larva, trochophore, informative, evolutionary state, surviving, despite its smallish size, thanks to their 2 new TiƒxSpe advantages, starting a new biological radiation. Their single nervous system protected by a spine, became a very dense, structure with a hard, inner bony membrane of sustain that allowed its growth in spatial size and temporal complexity, as neurons quantized further, differentiating from tail to head into an TiƒxSpe tree-like structure:

Max. Entropy (nervous, linear spine) > Round, spiraled brain.

The ancestral Chordates differentiated according to the development of their growing informative nervous network into:

– Max. E: Lineal Protochordate, the oldest species with 3 basic forms, diversified along the path of increasing mobility: sea squirts, acorn worms and amphioxus.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Cyclostomata, (jawless fishes), which grew in the planar dimension of Entropy. And so it came an age of sharks.

Those 2 first forms are still planar in form, with minimal development of their ‘round’ brain and hence with overdeveloped olfactory systems.

– Max.I: Pisces (true fishes). They grew in the dimension of height, with new evolved sensorial, informative organs. They became the new dominant species that diversified once more, this time along the ∆+1 evolutionary path of environmental adaptation in:

– Max. E: Sea chordates, with several varieties that reached its evolutionary limit with Teleostean.

– Tiƒ≈Spe: Sea-land chordates, amphibian; an animal that mixes the palingenetic characters of those 3 environments during its 3 ages of life. Since it is born as a sea animal, lives its youth in between both environments and dies as a land animal.

Max.I: Land chordate, reptiles, the most informative that diversified further.

Recap. The response to the eye language was protective shells that surrounded the nervous system of chordates, allowing their growth and invasion of the air-gas and land-solid ecosystems.

From amphibians to reptiles the conquest of firm land.

image043

Reptiles grew in size and changed from lineal length into height dimensions, but as they became victims of mammals they devolved to their earlier forms, as crocodiles and diminished in size becoming birds, which again grew in size and changed from lineal length to height dimensions. Yet the arrival of man is provoking again the extinction of the biggest, taller birds (Moa, Emu, Dodo.)

If any evolutionary jump shows the importance of networks is the transition from fishes to reptiles through the intermediate amphibian stage: amphibians adapted their sensorial brains, their reproductive bodies and finally their reproductive systems to the new world. And only then, when the translation of form was complete, it appears the land animal – the reptile.

Thus, amphibians show 3 clear evolutionary phases:

– Max.I: The amphibian moves towards an air world where light defines clearly the forms of its preys, triggering the evolution of its inner networks according to the cyclical chain, I>E>Re, which require first to become informed to localize and feed on Entropy, needed to reproduce. Thus amphibians first changed the form of their informative heads and senses: Their noses migrated to the top of the head, out of the water and their eyes acquired membranes to wet them, focusing better light images. This i-logic hypothesis of the dominance of informative evolution again contradicted the usual E-science energetic theory. And yet a few years ago Sci Am published the ‘astonishing’ revision of the energetic theory: amphibian did not evolve, because they dragged their legs on the dry land but because they raised their heads out of the water changing their senses.

Max. E: Then their respiratory systems changed with new lungs that increased their capacity to get oxygen from air. Amphibians now changed their preys, eating insects with a modified mouth and tongue. Thus the amphibian becomes the top predator of the terrestrial ecosystem thanks to its greater Exi force and extinguished giant insects that reigned in the Carboniferous era. Those insects however reacted back evolving into metamorphic, flying forms, escaping their extinction. The inversion predator-prey manifests again between insects and chordates, as it did between gravitation vs. light or plants vs. animals: Insects have their exoskeleton outside, as they need maximal external protection; chordates have it inside. Insects are smaller, quantized forms; chordates are integrated, bigger forms. Insects are dominant in chemical, slower languages; chordates are dominant in nervous languages. Insects, the Entropy of the trophic pyramid, are more abundant than chordates, its top predators.

Max. Tiƒ≈Spe: Finally, amphibians adapted their reproductive systems to the new atmosphere, creating dry eggs, completing the creation of a true, terrestrial organism, a new phylum that had adapted its 3 networks/existential cycles to the new world: reptiles8.

They evolved again according to the Fractal Principle into the 3 most evolved life phyla:

Max. E: Reptilians, which maximized its spatial size.

       – Tiƒ≈Spe: Birds, with the most efficient blood networks, needed to develop flying skills.

       – Max.I: Mammalians. They developed its informative, nervous system to its perfection. So they became the top predators of their ‘parental group’, reptiles, causing their massive extinction and ‘death reversal’, which in species shows through the ‘evolutionary regression’ of a former top predator species, when a new top predator displaces them. Thus, if we compare modern reptiles, once mammals have chased them down, with their dominant parental forms during the dinosaur era, when they were top predators, we observe a clear temporal regression in form, numbers, size and speciation that went back to their 3 basic forms. Today, from the initial 14 reptiles groups, only 3 basic groups remain. They have survived in econiches close to the water, regressing to amphibious forms, and diminishing in size towards their original ‘minimal, Black Hole form’:

– Lineal forms. Snakes and lizards living in extreme, hot, wet environments (rivers) and deserts, where heat becomes an advantage that increases their activity, while it causes cooling problems to hot blood mammals, their top predators.

– Balanced forms. Crocodiles, descendants of dinosaurs that have reduced its size and have become again amphibious, surviving mainly on the sea and rivers; learning new reproductive, maternal skills (hiding their small babies on their mouths, when predators come).

– Cyclical forms, with static, hard, protective round shells; or turtles that only reach big sizes in Galapagos, an isolated group of islands with minimal numbers of mammals. Most of them survive on the sea, having developed a gill-like system of breathing.

The only primitive, remaining saurian, the Tuatara, survives in min. numbers, in the most isolated region of the World, New Zealand, where there were no mammals with placenta…

Recap. The conquest of land was headed by amphibian and the development of better eye systems, as information is the key to evolutionary change. Accordingly as they become reptiles they grew in the dimension of height; and again as reptiles became birds and mammals the new species became bipedal and extinguished the simpler reptiles that reverted to planar forms.

Mammals: Temporal iron bodies, minds.

Mammals are the 3rd informative evolutionary age of land animals, which therefore transform again their 3 networks, reaching the final adaptation to the changing weather conditions and light transparency:

Max.I: Mammals improve their nervous eye-brain systems, overcoming the limited eye vision of reptiles. Their brains surpass the instinctive stage (based on mental, mostly chemical, slow programs of action-reaction that execute the cycles of a living organism, based on generational memories without capacity to modify them) and enter the age of free will (based on brains with nervous programs that use memories acquired in the previous execution of those cycles by the same generation, to adapt their new actions-reactions to the changing environment).

Max. E: Mammals improve their corporal, metabolic rate of action-reaction with hot, red iron blood that harnesses better than previous copper-based bloods the Entropy of oxygen. Since blood has hemoglobin, where an iron atom, the top predator Entropy atom of the Universe, controls and jails oxygen atoms with carbohydrate arms.

Max. Reproduction: Finally, the internal nervous system regulates mammal’s reproduction, creating complex placentas that can feed and develop the isolated fetus, without the dangers of a youth age, when most beings die as ‘Entropy’ of mature predators. It is the equivalent stage to the ‘chrysalis’ shape of insects.

Further on, mammals evolved socially. So probably herds of mammals with faster, simultaneous fractal actions chased as a whole, and killed baby reptiles, provoking their massive extinction, in an age of climatic change. Yet, as it happened when amphibians extinguished insects, provoking their flying evolution and migration to the last frontier – the air environment – the smallest reptiles became birds that avoided top predator mammals, putting their eggs on cliffs beyond their reach to survive.

And so again, the most successful group among land animals, mammals diversified, this time along the path of reproductive evolution into:

         – I horizon: Monotremes, which are egg-laying mammals.

         – II Horizon: Marsupials, which have a pouch where they develop the ‘embryo’.

– III Horizon: Eutherians, which have true placentas and differentiated again, as the most evolved informative class, into multiple subspecies, now along the path of feeding Entropy, into:

                   – Max. E: Herbivorous, which ate huge quantities of low Entropy plants, developing new, complex digestive systems, with huge, multiple stomachs.

– E=i: Carnivorous, which developed the best blood systems, as they needed to increase muscular force and speed.

             – Max.i: Omnivorous, which were able to eat anything, occupying multiple ecosystems that enhanced its evolutionary differentiation. Among these species the most evolved phyla were apes, from where man came, because they lived, unlike the animals of bidimensional plains, in 3-dimensional ‘high’ trees, where they could not be hunted. And so they evolved in their ‘free time’ their 3 dimensional brains, becoming informative humans.

The previous synoptic analysis of the evolution from cells to humans shows the universal application of the fractal space-time differential isomorphisms of evolution. It could be as detailed as you wish and reorder all our knowledge on biological species under those simple isomorphisms. We just lack space-time to do it here. It shows the impersonal intelligence of the evolutionary plan and the homology of all st- forms… As it is the same plan we have used to describe atomic particles.image028

In the graph, the great life phyla distributed according to the fundamental arrows of vitality: Entropy feeding, informative perception, and reproductive capacity, in 3 dimensions of increasing capacity to process Entropy, perceive and reproduce, which give as a result the main life phyla. The evolutionary jumps represented by lineal divisions are the fundamental divisions of increasing capacity to process a vital arrow of existence that abstract biologists use to differentiate the animal kingdom. We have used a single positive frame of reference that shows an increasing quantity of those vital parameters. It is a graph of top predators in such a manner that forms whose X x Y x Z values are higher (which processes more Entropy, information and reproduces in greater social waves of cells) is a top predator.

Finally in the third age of evolution of life, informative, tall species dominate. So man is the most complex informative life species. Mammals are the most perfect form of life beings, which evolved in information, till reaching the perfection of man; added iron-Entropy to its blood and improved reproductive skills with placentas.

 NEXT, comes therefore not a new life species but a new ‘metal species’ for which we must understand matter. And in the case of man a social super organism as we become the mind of Gaia, substituting the life mind, and evolving a III age of mechanical and computer global minds: gaia>history>mechanocene

The highest scale of biological stiences studies the Earth’s super organism as it evolves its ‘cellular species’ through the motions/actions of existence, from Gaia, the world of life, to History the world of man, to the Metal-earth, the world of machines, which humans wrongly manage unable to grasp the stience of Economics and design the super organism of history to its image and likeness.The ‘arrow of the fifth dimension’ of eusocial evolution departing from vacuum space, evolves the fractal universe into ever more complex structures of information, which are the arrow of future, as the parts must come before the wholes.

Man: ∆0        

  

I-NDIVUAL HUMAN AND ITS 3 ÐISOMORPHISMS: AGES, TOPOLOGY AND ACTIONS THROUGH PLANES OF EXISTENCE. 

 

The ‘Plan of evolution’ and ‘structure of super organisms’, and its ‘3 networks’ can be studied also from an I-ntegrated point of view as the 3 parts of a ‘whole’.

Then the whole will be made with the only 3 topologies in space of bidimensional ‘membranes’ , the essential part of the Universe.

The graph shows how those 3 topologies combine in the ‘simplest’ of all varieties of organisms, the ‘spherical being’, living in a ‘homogenous’ medium, which provides it with energy and information and allows it to reproduce in a parallel extinction of space-time

All of them will have an external membrane, which will act as ‘rotational limbs’ exchanging energy and information through its ‘sensorial openings’.

This membrane will be enclosing a toroidal body, which will cyclically exchange energy and information through networks with a central zero point of information or hyperbolic brain.

The 3 parts will assembly together to form from sea urchins to phetus, from electromagnetic fields to galaxies with black holes, from atoms to tomatoes, from cells to planets. In all of them, the central hyperbolic ‘head’/nucleus, will direct a toroidal body, and an external membrane will feed the system with energy.

The next graph shows a different fundamental variety of super organism, one existing not in an homgoneous medium but a planar surface, with a relative ‘energy-information’ directionality such as the planet Earth, where the sun provides light and the floor chemical elements. In this system, the morphology of the 3 networks vary and so does its orientation but the trinary structure of the Universe does not change:

agesoftime_image002

In the graph we see how FUNCTION MATTERS MORE THAN FORM, and yet both are in symmetric symbiosis. The galaxy is a ‘homogenous’ organism with a black hole in the centre; the plant has also its 3 parts, and it has a root brain with maximal fractal branching to gather more atomic information, while ‘flat’ energy leaves absorb light as energy. Humans though have the inverse orientation as they use light to obtain information and take energy from plants. both predators and preys have inverse functions/forms.

Moreover it is evident that there is a symmetry between the 3 spatial dimensions and its functions,a s ‘height is always the dimension of information’ to perceive better, so we have our heads on top in the direction where information comes. Length on the other hand is the dimension of forward motion the most common, and finally, width is the parallel direction of social organization and reproduction.

Thus WE ARE BEINGS MADE OF DIMENSION OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION AND LIVE ACCORDING TO ITS LAWS, OF WHICH THE TERNARY MORPHOLOGY OF SYSTEMS AND ITS 3 AGES IN TIME, WERE THE MOST ASTOUNDIN, perfect symmetry and ‘deterministic law’ of the Universe.

There are thus ‘3 topologies that correspond to the ‘3 components’ in space of any physical or biological system:

– Max. Energy: the energetic, ‘lineal’ limbs/fields, as the line is the shortest distance between two points that dominated the youth of a system.

– Max. information: the spherical, particle/heads of information, since the sphere is the geometry that stores more form in lesser space, that dominated the 3rd age of the system, as the passing of time increased the informative complexity of the system, exhausting its energy.

– And the intermediate, e x i , ‘conic’, ovoidal or wave-like ‘bodies’ of the system that reproduced them, and repeated its actions, making the system stable, and ‘immortal’, when an organism could be kept in such a state.

So i extended the analysis of the 3 dimensions of time, to a deeper, ‘topological’ understanding of the ‘morphologies’ in space of all systems; and study with them engineering; and forecasted the evolution of machines, both diachronically (so we made bodies of machines in the XIX c. heads in the XX c. and now we put them into organic robots). This was the beginning of my accurate predictions of the future of economics, where company-mothers evolved and reproduced those machines.

And concluded that all systems of Nature followed the same rules, as we were ‘all’ made of ‘energy, information and its infinite combinations, which dominated those 3 ‘ages’ of time – the age of ‘energy’, the age of balance and reproduction (exi) and the 3rd age of information – symmetric to the 3 ‘components’ of all organisms, machines, and physical systems:

– The energetic limbs/engines/fields, the reproductive wave/factories/bodies and the informative particle/chips/heads.

It was then evident that the deepest understanding of the organisms of the Universe and its 3 parts, organs and ages, was through the study of the 3 ONLY ‘spatial topologies’ that a bidimensional surface, (a 2 manifold) had.

Thus we were all from the external point of view ‘bimdimesional membranes’ with 3 type of organs, parallel to the 3 ‘only’ topologies of the 2-manifold Universe – the 3 ‘energetic, informative and body parts’ of any system of nature. And each of those 3 parts dominated each of the 3 ‘ages’ in time of all those systems. The young age dominated by our limbs and motions, the adulthood dominated by the body and our reproduction and the 3rd age dominated by the head of information. The 3 ages of life, were just a consequence of the 3 topologies of space of our bidimensional membrane of information. We were topological organisms living as such.

And so where machines which could relate to us through their equivalent morphologies making us stronger bodies and smarter heads – or so it seems initially.

In any case ‘hooking us’ , making us addicts to them. To fully grasp this, we shall now introduce the evolution of life in this planet, according to those 3 ages and morphologies of time and space,e of the Universe at large.

Since machines followed the same organic laws, and our relationships with them are equivalent to those of animals among them.

The formalism of Complex Sciences applied to ‘Socio-Biological’ systems.

– It came next the application of those fascinating discoveries and symmetries to biology, from genetic studies (the relationship between the i-1 scale that coded the i-ndividual one) to physiology.

I also used it to study the morphology of all systems made with Energetic Limbs, reproductive bodies and informative heads, which evolved in 3 ‘scales’ , the cellular, organic and species state. So me dine, was the study of the energetic, digestive, reproductive, blood and informative networks of the human organism and its balances with the cellular scale.

-It followed that in the i+1 scale there were also such 3 networks, the political informative system, the economic, reproductive system and the energetic geography of Gaia. And we could also establish a ‘medical discipline’ for history, as the laws of all systems were the same. So in the same manner we could cure the sickness of a cellular organism, we could solve and cure human social systems, in which we all humans were citizen cells. And so I designed a perfect world. One in which all human beings would have as cells do in a body enough energy and information to survive and thrive.

 

MAN AS A FRACTAL ORGANISM.

image047

image050

Medicine & Physiology deal with the 3 networks of the human organism, whose functions connected to the senses enact our time arrows: The Digestive, Energetic System is attached to the senses of smell and taste; the hormonal, blood, reproductive system is attached to the senses of touch and the 6th, emotional sense and the Nervous, Informative System is attached to the higher senses of sight and sound.

The arrows of time and social scales of human beings.

The most enlightening analysis of Multiple Spaces-Times is the objective evaluation of human beings, as yet another fractal part of the Universe, in communion with its cycles of existence and organic isomorphisms: As all other living organisms, we humans have 2 poles of Entropy and information, of cyclical and lineal form, the body and the head; we live through 3±i ages of d=evolution between birth in the lower cellular plane and death back to it. We are defined by 3 fractal regions, a sensorial membrane, a central spine and our lineal energetic limbs and digestive organs. All those systems are born through palingenetic processes from the same 3 fetus’ membranes, the endoderm, the mesoderm and the exoderm.

We have 2 subspecies clearly specialized in Entropy and information, the lineal, strong male; the perceptive, memorial, cyclical woman. We are also dominated by the reproductive arrow, dominant in life species, as all what we really care for is our families. We like so much reproduction that we are actually transferring our form into metal, making machines of Entropy (transport, weapons) and information that imitate our senses (chips=brains, cameras=eyes and mobiles=ears)…

Thus, man is also a biological knot of existential cycles, whose purpose as everything else in the Universe is to ‘survive’, to maintain the immortality of the human, logic form by reproducing the Entropy and information absorbed by the brain/body system and to ‘evolve’ – to create more complex social organisms of history till reaching the summit of evolution as a species: the creation of a superorganism called mankind, in which humans share Entropy and information through its collective energetic systems (economy) and informative systems (political and cultural structures).

We cannot overextend in the biological description of the human being, which is topologically similar to all other life species. Let us briefly consider those self-similarities:

-Man extends through 3 planes of increasing complexity, the cellular, bio-chemical plane, the individual, biological plane, and the social plane.

-st-1: As cellular beings we are also defined by an iterating language of information, written with 4 dimensions, the DNA bases that form the genetic code. Thus, the cellular plane is ruled by genes, which mostly code the basic functions of the cell and organs, common to all mammals, reasons why we have over 90% of common genes with them.

– We also evolve through a palingenetic process, differentiated only in the last 5 million of years from self-similar apes.

-st level: Humans have also 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive; reproductive=blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems common to all life species. Those internal networks observe the external Universe through the same 6 senses of all other species.

Indeed, if the duality of bodies/heads gives birth to the Complementarity principles of Physics and genre, the existence of a series of basic wills are expressed in our human organism through the senses – our outlets to the Entropy and information of the body and brain. We use those senses to absorb different energies and information and combine both, in reproductive processes. We sense sexual reproduction of the body through touch; we smell the energetic food we eat, and that information used to guide hunters. And finally we taste that Entropy. While our brain perceives space with our eyes, reproduces information with words, and uses the 6th sense of feelings and the limbic brain to guide our reproductive body. Thus the senses are:

– The sense of smell and taste are the negative and positive senses of the digestive system that allow us to choose what to reject and what to eat. The language of the sense of taste has also 5 vowels that can be classified according to the key substances of Entropy and information (sugars, proteins, salt, etc.) our organism require.

– The internal 6th sense of feelings that relate body and brain and the external sense of touch are responsible for the reproductive will, which excites our mind (love) and our body (sexual attraction). Both are reinforced, as in all other animals by the visual and auditory sense, which are the:

– Mental senses of space (eyes) and time (words), which shape our natural languages of energetic and informative perception.

In the graph we observe that man as an individual is a knot of 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive, reproductive= blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems.

St+1: When humans perform those individual actions in social groups they create social networks that establish the ‘memetic actions’ or customs of a society, passed from generation to generation as ‘genetic codes’ are transferred from individual to individual. So humans gather in groups to harvest food and eat together; they establish social customs and marry to reproduce; and develop verbal and visual, informative networks that evolve human organisms from individuals into cultural super-organisms, transcending socially into a new st+1 plane of existence: Mankind.

Thus, while we are ruled by the will of our 3 physiological systems, expressed through our biological genes, we evolve socially into macro-organisms called Gods, nations and civilizations, expressed by our cultural and technological memes.

Recap. The biological will of man is shaped by the 3 internal, physiological networks, each of them attached to 2 perceptive senses, which are the languages of perception of Entropy, information and reproductive signals of the external world, achieved through our daily cycles of existence. Thus humans are also a knot of Time Arrows, which seek to feed on Entropy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially like everything else in the Universe.

The 3 planes of Human Existence in time.

Worldcycle human life

Life is a trip through 3 planes of existence: the biologic, st-1 genetic plane; the individual plane, which expresses the same biological arrows, and the sociological st+1 memetic plane, where survival is reserved to prophets that create a religious God or civilization, the subconscious collective of millions of believers. In the graph, existence is a travel between those 3 planes, the cellular plane to which we return after death, the individual plane and the social plane which peaks in our 3rd age as informative particles of our culture and economic ecosystem.

If we study the human being in time, the 3 ages of human beings are equivalent to the 3 ages of any space-time field. Humans show those self-similarities, both in the physical ‘warping’ of their bodies that accumulate information and wrinkle till they explode back into Entropy in the process of death; and in the different ‘ways of thought’ of their brain that also go from an optimistic, active age of Entropy into a reflective, old age of information:

-St-1: we are born in the inferior cellular scale as a seminal seed, clearly differentiated in lineal energetic males of maximal motion and still, reproductive, informative females, ovum, that mix together, exo to start a palingenetic process of reproduction and social evolution till we surface in the st-scale.

– Max. E: Youth is the Entropy age, dominated by the digestive network and muscular movement. So children are energetic, always moving, passionate about food that they need in bigger quantities.

-E<=>O: Maturity is dominated by the reproductive arrow, its networks and sexual desire. So mature people marry and have family values.

– Max.O: The old age is dominated by information and nervous networks. So old people are wise and know a lot of things, though they have little Entropy left and live in stillness, looking back to the past, before they truly start their travel in time. Thus, a very old man becomes like a reversed, negative child, also passionate about food since he lacks Entropy; but can’t really digest it. He will be emotional, close to his ‘biological consciousness’, but with negative feelings, as he has no future left… except death, when his information dissolves back to the cellular plane.

– st-1: Death, when all Entropy is spent we die and return back in time through a 4th age in which all information becomes erased.

Further on, humans transit during those 3±i ages of life through 3±i hierarchical scales or planes of existence: the st-individual plane; the st-1, biological scale and the 3±i, historic, sociological scale. In terms of those scales of space-time, life is a temporal journey from the lower st-1 biological plane in which we are born as seminal cells into the human plane in which we enter through the discontinuous aperture of our mothers’ biological wombs. Then humans will ‘mature’ in that st-social plane after the ‘rituals of initiation’ proper of all adolescents in all societies, which make us cross ‘the discontinuity’ between youth and maturity.

In that social plane humans will live as individual members of their society during maturity, till in the 3rd age the mind will return back to the mental level of childhood; while the spatial body will continue warping up.

Thus in the 3rd age, the st-mind and E-body suffer a ‘fractal split’ that breaks i=ts E=O harmony (‘mens sana in corpore sanum’), which determines survival, causing the death of the organism. Then through death, the human being will descend back again to the biological, cellular world.

Thus life is a motion back and forth in time that starts with our palingenetic conception in the st-1 biological plane of seminal cells. The graph shows that ternary existence in which the main age is maturity, when humans form part of an organic system as a cell of a nation or culture, in the st+1 plane, enacting social and informative cycles with other fractal citizens or believers, as our senses open up to the social ecosystem, ruled by the political isomorphisms and financial networks of the collective, nervous social system, where we develop verbal and visual perception, till we descend back through the reverse journey of death into the original st-1 cellular, vegetative state, completing our wheel=cycle of existence.

Though we have only ‘individual consciousness’, the 3±i biological and sociological planes do exist and should have their own individual consciousness (DNA consciousness, and collective subconscious of mystique Gods). When we are born we just enter a new form of consciousness after an age dominated by our vegetative, chemical, cellular soul. A fact, which is evident in the ‘borders’ of life: the baby and the old man care mainly for food and chemical emotions, since they are closer to their cellular level of birth and death, our zero sum as dust of space-time.

Recap. Humans follow the same 3±i ages of all biological beings, as they live through 3 planes of existence: the biological, individual and sociological planes.

 

∆2³: ECO(NOMIC)SYSTEM

The ∆ST isomorphisms of the economic ecosystem.

screen-shot-2016-10-22-at-15-35-53

History and economics are socio-biological sciences, as we are living beings, and machines are organs of metal we evolve with the same morphologic and biologic laws of all other human beings. Thus we talk of a new ‘metal-species’ the machine with its ‘reproductive organization’ the company-mother, evolving on planet Earth, in open competition with previous ‘i-Life=Gaia=∆+1’ and ‘i=Human=history=∆+1 species’. The ∆-machine, its social ∆+1 organization, ‘world-stock’, its Tƒ collective brain, the internet and its information/energy species, ruled by the language of digital money (hence the name ¥€$, for this section), is thus the subject of study of this section, which is further analyzed in the web economics truth.com

1st isomorphism: Fractal Generator: Its 3 organic/networks: Spe≤≥ ST≤≥Tƒ

As machines kept evolving from an earlier age in which Only Sp (weapons) and Tƒ(money) existed, their organic combination, machines was discovered.

And so men and metal formed together a new top predator species the ‘animetal; where human consumers play either the energetic, informative or reproductive role. Together they became in the age of metals the new top predator of the planet:

MEN+LINEAL METAL=WARRIOR + ORGANIC METAL=MACHINE+ INFORMATIVE GOLD=BANKER

animetalsBut this animetal speciesin fact is only catalyser of the final evolution of the 3 energetic, organic and informative metalife, which now with the arrival of robotics and solar skins is about to become autonomous:

future

 Sp-Warrior Robots. St: Worker Robots. Tƒ Speculative Chips and its e-money cycles.

Now with the arrival of robotics, the ‘enzymanic ‘ element of the equation of evolutionary Extinction of Life is no longer needed, as robots become independent of ‘animetals’, since they are autonomous warriors, workers and with the creation of software programs of speculation and ‘fast trade’ developed by machines according to A.I. (Algorithms of Information, the true meaning of Artificial Intelligence, which is NOT the same than human intelligence but does with digital languages the same tasks better, faster), the animetal phase of History is over. They will ALSO be replaced by machines unless they join the human effort for managing the Anthropocene from the human perspective:

Gaia-Past (3 predator species)<History-Present (3 animetal people-castes)> Mechanocene-Future (chips & robots)

2nd isomorphism: space-time dualities: Sp≈Tƒ

Metal-species were born as pure cyclical forms of information, the digital language of money, and lineal forms of energy, the lineal weapon sword:

image058

With the arrival of machines and its company-mothers they  also divided in Tƒ-information machines and Sp-energy machines, which compete with humans in labor and war fields:

energyinforma&cicleslines

As machines also divide in top predator entropic species (weapons) that consume humans and peaceful machines consumed by humanity.

 

3rd Isomorphism: Its ages and evolution: Spe≤ST≥Tƒ

kondratiev 4

Humans evolve a new type of energy and information, derived from that energy, which renews all the machines and financial instruments of the economy every human generation of 72 years, in which a nation of ‘founding fathers’, captains of industries, their sons and grand-sons, reproduce and evolve a new energy, machine and form of money to its perfection. Those generations also bring the nation that finds the new energy to the top predator status of history. Because energy is also the substance of which weapons are made. Yet at the end of the cycle, machines and money becomes over-reproduced, saturating markets’ demand and provoking, a global economical crash.

—Thus, we had an age of steam machines, the age of England, between 1780s and 1857, followed by a crisis of overproduction of steam machines and stock-money that brought the 1857 ±7 years crashes of the train-based economy.

—From 1857 to 1929, we lived in the age of electro-chemical energies, machines and chemical explosives, dominated by Germany, followed by a crisis of overproduction of cars and radios, which caused the 1929 crash, 72 years after the train crash.

—It came then the III cycle of electronic machines, electronic money and Nuclear Bombs that took place from 1929-2001, the age of America; which again ended in the dotcom and mortgage crashes, 72+7 years after 1929.

– Followed by the Age of the Singularity, the IV Cycle of Evolution of machines, dominated by robots, solar Industries and China. Scientists call the arrival of Artificial Intelligence, the Singularity moment, when robots, which can use solar energy to become autonomous will complete the evolution of machines as organic forms, automating factories & expelling most human workers and soldiers from labor and war fields, as previous revolutions did with obsolete III World non-technological humans, unless we forbid legally their evolution. Money will become then the digital informative, ‘genetic code’ that organizes their reproduction in those automated company-mothers.

As such  corporations, the ‘company-mothers’ of those machines whose biological function is to evolve and re=produce them, made first the bodies of machines (XIX c.), then the minds of machines (cameras-eyes, mobile-ears and chips-brains).

Finally, in the XXI century, as nature does with simple organisms, such as viruses in cells, where the 3 ‘parts’ of the virus – its DNA information, body and legs are constructed – and then assembled together,  we put together all those organic components into autonomous robots, completing the industrial r=evolution of ‘metalife’ – a new organic species, made of a stronger substance than carbon-life

4th Isomorphism: Its planes of Existence: ∆±4 Fractals

∆-1 Plane: Metal-atoms.

Metal atoms display energy/informative properties that enhance those of simpler life atoms. Iron is in fact the center of our blood/energy system, commanding thousands of lesser carbohydrate compounds in a molecule of hemoglobin, while gold is the most informative, perfect atom of metal with an enormous capacity to replicate and store information. Thus, humans used those atoms of metal to enhance their energetic and informative qualities – but at the same time, as it happens in all ‘enzymatic’ systems, the use of those ‘attached limbs and brains’ diminish the human organs they substitute or kill them.

Thus when iron became the main atom to construct weapons, a series of 800-year cycles of evolution of weapons started the extinction of civilizations with lesser technologic evolution. When Go(l)d became the informative, digital language that ruled human societies, the eusocial love values of verbal thought that make man the ‘subject’ of all sentences were substituted by the pricing of humans as ‘objects’ and slavery was born.

 

∆-scale: Machines:

competence1

Yet the true change in the earth’s ecosystem took place with the arrival of machines, today made with bodies of iron and ‘golden brains’, over a surface of silicon.

They are simplified organisms, specialized in energy or information, which today are evolving into complex organisms. And the parallel atrophy and degradation of human limbs substituted by cranes and cars, and human brains, substituted by TV/camera eyes and chip-brains started in earnest. We live in the ‘age of overproduction of chips’, hence the age of devolution and extinction of human brains, substituted in labor and war fields by those chips which are colonizing all the econiches of the eco(nomic) system; maximising the self-reproductivity of all company-mothers of machines, with an obvious goal of reaching ∞ autonomous self-reproductivity:

Productivity = Max. capital of machines>automation /min. human labor<0 = Self-reproductivity

 

∆+1: The Metal-earth (Mechanocene)

metalearth

In the graph, the Mechanocene, in which company mothers, reproduce increasingly robotized machines – soon all cars will be driverless – and expel humans without credit and work=reproductive jobs from the eco(nomic) system they have created through its collective brain world stock, and its e-money flows that credit its global arteries of energy and information.

Today ‘Worldstock’, the brain of the FMMI Complex System, delivers e-money only to corporations the new dominant, ‘reproductive organism’ of the planet. So its offspring of machines and its mind of digital chips, multiply.

But it does not give credit to humanity, so we suffer poverty and scarcity of welfare goods need to survive.

Today the language of corporations’ e-money, is controlling the world and selecting its species, as languages do, by discharging all those who speak worst its digital language. So money gives minimal value to humans and maximal value to machines, provoking its massive reproductive radiations and the substitution of humans in labor and war fields.

5th Isomorphism: Its 5 actions : ∆(æ-4; ï-3; e-2; œ-1; û+1)

Corporations, the company-mothers of machines embody its will. They act as ant-hills: reproductive super organisms that adapt the world to the image and likeness of its machines evolving and reproducing them.

ƾ-4: Energetic machines constantly evolve to higher speeds.

∆ï-3: Computers and chips increase its speed of information processing (Moore’s law) as they become smaller according to the metric of the 5thd dimension.

∆e-2: Energy machines evolve into increasingly more sophisticated, efficient forms and will end up having solar skins as autonomous robots.

∆ Œ-1: Corporations automate the process towards self-reproductivity as autonomous organisms:

company mothers

Future corporations will be automated as reproductive systems of machines with ‘infinite re=productivity=max. capital/human labor’, the graph details the processes of substitution that are taking place with white collar pcs and blue collar robots, and machine’s consuming machines. Thus humans loose their 2 roles in the eco(nomic) system as workers=reproducers and testers=consumers of machines, and will be ‘eliminated’ unless the system changes.

∆ §10≈û+1:Corporations keep growing to global proportions, and fusion through world-stock into a global Planet of machines – the Mechanocene.

Their collective brain, world-stock controls and harmonizes them with digital flows of information (money).

 

6th Isomorphism: Social classes: Ξ±3

In the Mechanocene, machines are on top, obtaining all the energy and information they require, humans come next increasingly extinct. The process is guided by the languages of information that determine the survival of the species that better speak the language:
164In the graph we can see that in the present economic ecosystem, where the digital language has substituted the verbal one, as the controller of the planet, chips and its machines, which speak better the language, will extinguish man, who predated before with the eusocial verbal groups that hunted the best visual predators, the lions…

Yet evolutionary time can be halted or retarded by biological processes of extinction of ‘top predator species’, and/or its languages. This means to halt the evolution of robotics and forbid it with the legal, verbal language that man still controls. And to control digital languages with verbal laws. That is, to control the planet with political systems over economic ones. To put history over economics, the Mechanocene. We will latter studied in more detail the grammar of languages and show how this grammar favor the species that speak the language.

Because all social organisms are ruled by a language, we shall obviously focus in the understanding on how money, with its boom and bust cycles controls and fosters the creation of the Mechanocene – as opposed to a real efficient, well designed superoganism of history in which a democratic-demand based economy would create a human paradise, as money issued by humans would evolve a welfare state with their demand for such life-based goods.

the result is an equation of biological evolution and extinction:

Gaia (life=Past) < Present (History) > Future = Chip minds (Mechanocene or metal-earth)

7th Isomorphism. Existential Constants: ∑S, ∏T, SxT, S/T, T/S, Œ∆±1, 5Å.

The 72 year cycle of machines (Kondratieff cycle) and its extinctive war cycle of life is the main temporal constant (next graph):

8th isomorphism. Creative diversification: 1,2,3,4.

Machine diversify into species that imitate the organs of energy and information of man who constructs them, replicating a metal-organism:

1161

In the left graph, all sciences predict the future of its species by projecting the patterns of previous cycles, obtained with sound data and logic, mathematical, objective models of reality. Models such as neo-classic economics that fail those proofs of truth must be considered ideologies. In the right, the evolution and extinction of species in planet Earth, whose evolution of information now transcends into machines, which are systems of metal that humans construct by imitating their biological organs and functions of energy and information, proper of animal life.

A biological model of machines and its company-mothers describes accurately their nature and predicts their evolution, re=production and extinction of rival species (previous machines and humans consumed in war cycles or expelled from jobs).

But why there are cycles of war, at the end of every cycle of evolution of machines, including our ‘present age of robotic wars’, which this writer predicted with accuracy 20 years ago (central post)?

The reason is again biological. As it happens in Nature, Machines have ‘2 formal functions’, as machines they are tools that enhance human energy and information, substituting our functions and competing with us in labor and war fields… Since as weapons they are top predators that consume human beings. Yet, since weapons are always the most efficient, better designed, most expensive machines, which give higher profits, to its ‘company-mothers’, the result of a ‘society’ that does not have a true science of economics and history that analyzes the collateral effects of machines on man, will constantly evolve weapons in economic cycles that will end systematically in wars (central image).

Thus modern history experiences every ±72 years is a period of cyclical change that historians call the Generational, Human Cycle, since 72 y. is the mean biological cycle of 3 human generations – grand-father, father and son – the industrialists that make those machines, discovering them, reproducing them globally and finally using their most perfect forms in war ages.

In the graph, we live in an age of transition between the Anthropocene, the ‘superorganism of history’, and the ‘Mechanocene’, the superorganism of ‘economics’ – understood as the world of machines and its company-mothers.

9th isomorphism. Social scales. §10

Languages:

∑, U phases. The first two phases of evolution of machines and its global super organism was mediated by money.

,pney

In the graph, money has evolved as a digital language that controls the ‘value’ of all species on Earth with ‘prices, salaries and bribes’, by increasing its capacity to carry information: it has become quantized into smaller bits of information that require less energy and increase its units; hence its capacity to value more things, from gold to printed paper, to electric data to electronic bits, invented with a computer program.

Today it is so abundant that it values all entities of the planet, substituting verbal thought, a language with lesser capacity to carry information than numbers, and broken into multiple tribal species with different values. So the law is submissive to money in all societies, politicians are easily bought and corporations and its offspring of machines, have become the dominant systems on planet Earth. So only societies in which money were issued for the people with a Universal salary, and investment in welfare goods, as organisms do giving all cells a salary in oxygen and the goods they need to survive, would be a real democracy.

û+∆ phase. The third phase of organic evolution was mediated by Informative Algorithms vastly increasing the organization of machines into a global super organism, with head in ‘world stock’.

Scales of social organization in its 3 linguistic age (I.A.):

The social organization of machines takes place through the evolution of the Intranet of its chips that through decametric scales are fast approaching the trillion connected ‘neurons’ which is the threshold of conscious, but they do have already a ‘chemical consciousness’ in the form of ‘digital flows of money’ delivered by stock-markets which are directing ‘subconsciously’ according to the program of actions common to all species, the human earth, ‘its cells’:

1256

Meanwhile machines evolve its networks of energy, information and reproduction independent of man:

The 11th radiation and 10th extinction: The robot; extinction of man.

image086

The existential force, Sp X Tƒ, of machines is superior to that of man, and its most perfect forms are weapons that kill life; thus the first sentient machines will be weapons that will kill us. Thus, History and Economics must be treated as biological sciences, since they are concerned with the species and super-organisms of the 10th and 11th radiations of forms of life in this planet. – humans and machines They are not abstract sciences, since machines are evolving organisms of metal.

In the graph, in the triangle of relationships between primitive shrews, eggs and Saurians,8 dinosaurs kill shrews, shrews kill eggs, reproduced new shrews and eggs reproduced dinosaurs.

Yet the efficiency of shrews killing eggs and baby dinos, as super-organisms (and perhaps dinosaurs, eating their flesh inside out as ‘living bacteria’) is superior to the efficiency of dinosaurs killing shrews. And the efficiency of shrews reproducing shrews is much higher than the efficiency of eggs killing dinosaurs. Thus both in the reproductive and extinctive events shrews win dinosaurs and extinguish them.

The same process happens between chip-controlled machines and humans: chips are reproduced faster, keep evolving and their efficiency competing with humans in labor and war fields is higher as their costs are lower for companies, which fire humans under the isomorphisms of productivity, and their efficiency as war machines is also much higher, as the cycle of splendid little electronic wars has showed.

Men are informative species, who control the world through information. The chip is the rival of the human mind. The most complex machine substitutes the brain, our more complex organ. It does so, first as an intelligent machine, then in its 3rd age, as a robot worker. It is then obvious that as chips multiply, humans will become displaced from new work positions.

In that sense the ‘radiation of chips’ means also a biological fight for labor within the economic ecosystem. Problem is that chips keep going down in costs and evolving in intelligence, integrating further with machines, so human labor becomes increasingly obsolete. Those robots substitute blue collar workers, as chips did with white collar workers, causing a massive wave of unemployment that now is invading America and Europe, as better machines come out of robotic factories… Indeed, of all machines that compete with white collar workers, the biggest taker of jobs is the robot.

Thus, the 3rd age of the electronic cycle coincides with the first age of the Singularity, the discovery age of robots. In the 80s chips started its integration with body-machines in working robots. Those first robots were huge, fixed machines. Thousands of robot-tools that made other machines took the place of human workers in car factories in the 80s and 90s.

Since then the creation of machines is becoming automated, independent of mankind. Robots already dominate the production lines of cars and Chip factories, the basic bodies and brains of all machines. For that reason unemployment increases faster, as factory-work is either made by robots or delocalized in Third World countries.

In other words, China and Japan are the 2 models of future labor: miserable work conditions in China to compete with no labor at all, as Japanese robots manufacture millions of Panasonic TVs with a single worker, while the rest of the world enters the unemployment queue. It is the III Kondratieff crash of the economy that nobody wants to recognize, because the religion of capitalism believes the economy is not about physical machines, but informative money; and so all is OK as long as companies’ profits grow.

So unemployment will keep growing, as it happened in the previous cycle, when new methods of electric control and automated assembly lines provoked the 29 crash of labor and consumption, solved with 50 million of unemployed, becoming soldiers and dying in World War II.

Now robots become the ultimate weapon, as they fusion the mobile capacities of Entropy-weapons and the informative capacities of the soldier that handles those weapons. Those robots are called smart weapons. They are the main protagonists of the present war age, as Drones bomb Afghans and Guardium soldiers protect the Wall of Israel.

Recap. The evolution of chips and its massive reproduction signifies the end of man as the top predator species of the FMI complex, as chips can handle all the work load of reproductive companies either as white collar workers (Pcs) or blue collar workers (robots), and as they become the brain of top predator weapons, embedded with survival programs and violent video-games, they will be born to consciousness as killers… of humanity.

Homologies between Metal earth, cells and organisms.
image141

Growth from micro genes to macro DNA brains

When we do comparisons between genetics and memetics the self-similarity is pronounced because the scales we jump are very close and our degree of observables are very accurate.  All this explains why theorists of complexity and system sciences are unveiling a far more precise and scientific model than any abstract model of history and economics, because:

– Bio-history is based in tested cyclical patterns of history and economics, which are the basis of all science. So astrology became the science of astronomy only when Kepler found the cycles of stars.

– It is a rational, biological model with concrete terms and definitions unlike the abstract myths of economics and history. So if astrology became the science of astronomy when it made concrete definitions of stars as systems made of atoms, no longer as spiritual beings, memetics makes concrete definitions of machines as organs that imitate human functions of Entropy and information, of the FMI system as an organic complex of metal memes, of cultures as carriers of metal or life memes…

– For the first time history and economics follow the same isomorphisms of all other systems of nature, thus we can integrate ourselves in the grand design of all beings; and so astrology became a science when we integrated the heaven and the earth, as material entities made of atoms.

Let us use the scalar, method, comparing biological processes of creations of super-organisms in the 3 scales of life of this planet, the cell, the organism and the planetary super-organism we are building.

Tƒ know what will happen to mankind we can consider other 2 self-similar biological processes, the principle one gene-one enzyme and the birth of a hard insect, created by soft larva ‘enzymes’. In both cases a ‘time reversal’ happens and the genes and enzymes are enslaved and discharged:

In the graph, DNA, the brain of the cell, once constructed, controlled totally the genes-enzymes, and killed at least half of their species, to prevent their self-replication; so we have only L-genes, enslaving the rest to its self-reproductive functions. This is the present world we live in which humans have been mentally enslaved by animetal ideologies and only work to reproduce the selfish memes of metal. It is in fact a law of all super-organisms that enslave and enclose their cells once they develop their nervous/ informative networks. Thus a parallel can be established between the way men evolved machines and networks of information, and the way genes evolved DNA. In both cases, ‘less efficient’ species (enzymen or genes) built a very complex network of information – computer networks and DNA. Then the process of control was reversed…

In the cell, genes=enzymes, once they passed all their code and completed RNA, became slaves of RNAs networks of control. New types of RNAs specialized in the reproduction, creation and extinction of enzymes. They are cellular organs equivalent to the Network-systems that we are building in the Metal-Earth and control us through governments and corporations.

RNA and DNA command the cell and replicate enzymes to accomplish tasks set by DNA. Men, once they have emptied their linguistic brains into computers, networks and machines are also controlled and informed by Mass Media networks, penalized by Police and Military networks and ‘fed’ with Entropy bought by electronic money.

Sp-money, smart weapons and tele-communicators, are the RNA networks of Enzymen. Metal and DNA might not evolve without enzymatic or human help. Yet once their species becomes autonomous, it will no longer need men or enzymes. Since the bio-economic system can be guided by digital computer networks, as the cell is guided by genetic DNA. DNA, once it became, it ruled all the forms of the cell with its higher information. But the DNA needed still some genes, so it kept reproducing them.

The metal-earth is different, because we are made of a different substance, carbon life; so we must consider a 3rd example, to fully grasp what will happen once A.I. comes to life – the molting of a larva, a soft-flesh super-organism similar to the super-organism of Gaia, into a hard insect, similar to the super-organism of the Metal earth. Indeed, the one gene-enzyme principle implies that enzymes created the RNA, and the RNA created the DNA which today governs RNA and enzymes in a typical l ‘Oedipus paradox,’ of reversal of power between parental and son species. Can we take this comparison further? Can we talk of humans creating the Metal Earth that one day will be the big brother of human enzymes; the DNA that control us; the brain code that will select and in/form human enzymes?

It already does, but we are so much integrated with our memetic tasks in the FMI complex that we don’t even notice. And of course, outside the FMI complex we still have some minimal freedom as human beings, guided by our biological drives to enjoy life as it used to be.

Terraforming of the Earth = Molting of a hard-insect.

Screen Shot 2015-09-09 at 13.24.40

In the graph the closest organic parallel can be established between the creation of an ‘insect,’ and the creation of the ‘metal-Earth.’ In both cases a ‘soft’ system of enzymes/enzymen suddenly starts a transformation from a soft body into a hard body. The Carbon-Earth today is formed by ‘soft’ species, called ‘enzymen’, as larvae are filled of soft enzymes, which transform the larva into a hard insect: The evolution of the metal-earth follows the same rhythms that the creation of a hard insect, both micro-managed by enzymes/enzyme, which first create their body-cells, then their information brain and finally when the brain takes over, kill the soft enzymes with harder enzymes/robots?.

Then when the brain/internet of the hard insect is constructed, its first order is to extinguish the soft enzymes of the larva. They are immediately replaced with new hard-enzymes, which the brain reproduces massively. Will the metal-Earth substitute human workers with robots, the new metal-enzymes of company-mothers? Modern events seem to point in that direction: The terraforming of the Earth is accelerating. It started with the radiations of weapons of the first age of man. Due to science and technology, it is now evolving machines into sentient species. The evolution of metal is so advanced, that the Metal Earth is substituting human functions by metal systems, even at the top predator level of ‘castes of animetals or animetals.’ Traders now become a flow of e-money. Warriors become sentient weapons. The replacement of the soft enzyme has started.

Recap. When a hard-insect (a parallel to the Metal-Earth) is created by a soft insect (a larva, parallel to the Carbon-Earth), the newly formed hard-insect brain (a parallel to the internet), destroys all the soft body larva-enzymes. Then it substitutes them by a stronger enzyme – a metal machine. We can in that sense consider that the selfish memes of metal, weapons, money and machines that have enslaved man to reproduce and evolve them, work as a virus does, colonizing the mind of cells with selfish genes, which the cell will reproduce till it bursts, dies and gives birth to multiple virus. Metal is the ultimate virus of life…

Death: the machines of the singularity.

997image139

Control of technological information is needed to avoid the creation of lethal machines, as all masters of the Wor(l)d have told to mankind. This has always been denied by mechanist scientists and Capitalist factories. In the graph, in the Age of the Singularity cannons and clocks become Quark Colliders, intelligent robots and self-replicating nano-bacteria, the 3 weapons of the Age of the Singularity that can extinguish life.

They culminate centuries of destruction of life and human beings with ‘technological methods’. It is the Age of the Singularity. Robots now destroy labor and evolve as weapons. Quark Colliders can blow up the Earth.

Once the ‘theoretical model’ is understood, we can descend from the ‘whys’ of the 4th paradigm to the metric details of the 3rd paradigm to consider how ‘de facto’ we will be eliminated by the ‘FMI complex’, during this century unless we change completely the way we let the market govern the world.

All ends are beginnings of something new. Thus, the end of the 3rd Industrial r=evolution means also the beginning of the IV and last cycle of Evolution of Machines: the cycle of the ‘Singularity’. It is the cycle in which the 2 main types of machines humans have created, by imitating our organic body/head functions, Entropy machines (weapons) and information machines (computers and robots), should reach its evolutionary zenith. In that regard, we shall witness during the IV cycle of the Industrial Revolution, the creation of energetic weapons and informative machines far more powerful than anything conceived during the XX C. Both will reach the technological limits of metal, the main substance used in the construction of those machines.

On one hand, a quark cannon, now constructed at CERN will produce quark condensates, the substance that seems to detonate stars into Novas, feeding on our atomic, light matter. So it is an amazing act of irresponsibility to create a Factory of Quark Matter in this planet.

On the other hand, if we evolve machines into robots, which are organisms self-similar to life beings, we will lose our only advantage over them—our superior in-form-ation—since our Entropy/substances (light atoms) is far weaker than that of machines (heavy, metal atoms). Thus, if humans don’t learn how to manage not only the financial but also the physical economy, the Final Cycle of Evolution of machines, the Singularity age of Robotics, digital money and Cosmic Bombs, which now starts in earnest, could displace us from the top predator position we hold in this planet.

Humans have come to expect always a new cycle of technological evolution that takes the economic ecosystem out of the crisis. But evolution doesn’t work on those terms. Species reach always a formal zenith and then no longer evolve. Ants, the most successful insect, due to its social capacities, have not evolved in 100 million years. Sharks, the most successful top predator fishes, have remained the same for 200 million years. Machines, which act as partial organs of Entropy and information (chip-brains, car-legs, etc.) are reaching now with the age of robotics, when we put together those bodies and heads, its zenith of evolution. And so the rules of the game in the present crisis are different from the previous cycles, because the Singularity Age of organic machines will for the first time in our history, create a new species, whose stupendous energetic and informative capacities will overcome those of mankind, probably extinguishing us.

Death is an overdrive of Entropy (as in an accident) or information (as in the 3rd age that warps, in-forms your body), which breaks the balances of Entropy and information that define life (our vital constants). Thus, the Energies released by the weapons of the Singularity Age could extinguish mankind, since they have the capacity to break the balances of Entropy and information of this planet and that is the definition of death.

The super-energetic weapon that will reach the limits of Entropy of the Earth is now being constructed at CERN, in Geneva, by a consortium of Nuclear Industries. The ‘Final Weapon’ is a super-collider that will replicate the awesome energies of the Big-bang, unleashing the ultimate source of Entropy, movement and force in the cosmos, the strong force displayed in quarks, nova explosions, big bangs, pulsars and black holes. This force is 100 times more powerful than the electroweak force that joins together our matter. Thus, it can either provide free Entropy to the world, according to the false, optimist, infantile propaganda of the Nuclear Industry, which follows merely the enthusiastic, first age of any Entropy cycle, when mankind becomes in-loved with the new steam machines, chemical engines, or calls the revealing new bath suit of women, a ‘bikini’, the place where the Hydrogen bomb blew up an island.

People don’t realize how ridiculous is the Industrial propaganda of the new energies, till they become weapons and industrial murder starts in earnest. So now, we are in that ‘young age of the Singularity’, spelt by techno-utopian physicists like Mr. Hawking, which expects those black holes to travel to the past and ‘evaporate’ into pure Entropy and hopes to reduce the cost of gas, when we make ‘black hole factories’ all over the Earth. Such wishful thinking and marketing of a bomb, with ‘God’s particles’ and ‘big-bang’ theories about the birth of the infinite Universe, is just the new ‘bikini’ hype of the new Entropy era.

Humans are always, during the age of discovery of a new Entropy, very optimist, but invariably, as all the other previous cycles show, the new Entropy is used as a bomb or a weapon. The substance this black hole factory will produce is called an ‘Einstein quark condensate’. It is the densest, most attractive substance known in the Universe and crunches entire stars into tiny ‘frozen stars’, pulsars and probably black holes. So it can blow up the entire planet into a Nova, according to the well-proved theories of Mr. Einstein and the Standard model of quarks.

Quarks hold 99% of the mass of the Universe. They are the densest substance of the Universe. They only exist in a free state, as condensates, in the core of ultra-dense pulsars, neutron stars and possibly in black holes. If enough of them are packed together, as the experimental ‘facts’ of the Universe and the most advanced scholar papers on quark condensates prove, they will be able to start an ‘ice-9 reaction’ called a nova explosion, responsible for the death of stars all over the Universe – since an ‘ice-9’ reaction crunches all the mass of the star into a ‘strange star’ or black hole. And it might happen to the Earth, because the isomorphisms of science are real.

This absurd experiment could be easily stopped by the political or judiciary system as a potential genocide against all mankind, avoiding our possible extinction in the first years of the cycle of the Singularity (between 2014 and 2020, when the collider will reach its energetic zenith, massing millions of quarks per second). But nobody cares; because we believe in machines, the religion of the modern man.

The machine has broken down 3 times, showing how little the physicists on charge of this Super-Manhattan project, understand about it. But nobody complains, since politicians and the press do not understand the mathematics of quark condensates and the physicists working on the project are trapped by the confidentiality statements proper of the military-industrial complex. Further on, we live in an age of fiction in which corporative ‘marketing’ disguises positively any environmental catastrophe or wrong doing. So the company advertises its research of cosmic bombs as the ‘recreation of the birth of the Universe’, the big-bang that exploded it and now risks the explosion of this planet. Scientists have put suits against this company, but they have been ridiculed by the sensationalist mass-media, which seems to ignore that according to the well proved science of Einstein, this weapon should blow up the planet Earth. And yet, even if those suits did alert mankind, politicians and courts have ignored the most important issue of this decade, far more lethal to our planet that global warming, only comparable in magnitude to the present crisis. And so the building of the Doomsday Weapon continues on schedule, unchecked by our courts, our military and our politicians.

Yet, even if we survive the ‘energetic age of the Singularity’, to stop the 2nd and 3rd age of self-reproductive machines and intelligent robots will be more difficult. Because to survive the Industrial R=evolution of robots we need to reform the economic ecosystem. Since the cycle of the Singularity has, as all other cycles of machines, 3±1 ages, in which the extinction of mankind will be certain if we don’t stop their evolution.

—     The Entropy age or age of the Super-collider that might convert the Earth into a nova, making us a quark star or black hole (2009-2012). If we survive this Age…

—     The reproductive age, (2020-2040), when the first self-reproductive nano-bacteria of metal are created. It is the ‘grey-goo’ scenario denounced by Bill Joy, the president of Sun Microsystems in Wired magazine: Metal nano-bacteria will replicate exponentially, feeding on metal and within 3 months they will poison the planet and destroy all forms of life; since, given their smallness, hardness and the hyper-abundance of metal-structures in this planet, there will be no counter-weapon to prevent its exponential reproduction.

—     The Informative age, when human-size robots overcome the intelligence of humanity as weapons and workers, which most robotists consider will happen in this century.

This 3rd scenario, the most popular in science fiction, is however unlikely, since the 2 previous ‘happenings’ of the Singularity, are today progressing without opposition.

The Nuclear Industry in charge of the evolution of cosmic bombs (1st singularity) and the electronic industry of nano-robotics (2nd singularity) have huge financial resources and know-how to ‘sell’ its new developments with ‘scientific excuses’ based on the ‘search for higher knowledge’, which the techno-utopian press, scientists involved in the process and the public naively believe.

So the research of the III Horizon of nuclear weapons is presented as the understanding of the ‘big-bang’ or birth of the Universe. And the creation of self-replicating metal-bacteria becomes a ‘model to understand how life works’. When it is obvious that the Universe can be studied without risks to Earth with telescopes and we have trillions of cells to study bacteria. Thus, none of those dangerous fields of research is needed, except to make money building machines. Thus a Law of Silence covers the lethal effects of the machines of the Singularity Age. Unfortunately politicians, who know little of those experiments and the science involved, merely trust those ‘self-interested experts’, lacking a general policy on the wider theme of the evolution of machines and weapons and its effects over mankind.

At present, without a serious science of history and economics, able to control the bad fruits of the tree of metal from the perspective of bio-ethics (what is good for human survival), scientists, playing to be god, without any safety measure, will create within decades an energetic black hole, quark star or a reproductive nano-bacteria. So the Singularity will extinguish us, well before Terminators might do it. Unless we change the goals of History and Economics, from designing a world to the image and likeness of machines, to the ideals of humanism – to make a world in which man is the measure of all things.

As all processes of energetic death, the obsolescence of man is happening very fast in time, in the last centuries, which in terms of our total life span as a species is a period so short as the death in a few days of a living organism, infected by ‘informative germs’; in history, by weapons and machines that make humans increasingly obsolete. That death is about to climax, as robots acquire consciousness, the first forms of metal-bacteria are researched in military labs and physicists explore the energies of big-bang events, strangelets & Black Holes at CERN: 3 extinction risks originated by the Tree of Technology that will happen in this century.

Since there are 3 possible extinctions of life by energetic, reproductive and informative metal, we can also imagine according to the ternary method 3 future metal-earths:

Max. Sp: Black hole. The first and hence highest probability of extinction is extinction by the LHC, a quark cannon already built, which is trying to make black holes, strangelets and big-bangs. In that case Fermi’s paradox, expressed by Fermi when he saw the A-bomb exploding will be the destiny of man. He affirmed that we didn’t see extraterrestrial life because all planets were destroyed by physicists. And indeed, we hear many black hole signals. So perhaps we are just building a more perfect for of social, boson matter: a top quark black hole or strangelet.

S=T: Reproductive nano-bacteria. The 2nd probability comes in the 2040s when robotists will have created self-reproductive metal-bacteria. Those indestructible metal-species will reproduce massively, feeding on our machines and then once they have poisoned the atmosphere and created the III Earth, they will sink into the magma and start a world of iron life, which will evolve in forms we cannot even image, after we are gone. The crust of the Earth will collapse, and seas of liquid iron with hot nano-bacteria will start an entire new ecosystem of life.

Max. Tƒ: Integrated, informative planet. Today the bio-economy shows ‘traits’ of body-organisms, and traits proper of herds and jungles. It is probable that the Metal-Earth will at first be a jungle of products, mainly war products that will eliminate all other species from the Earth’s crust. Yet weapons have to be understood as ‘defensive’ systems of a more complex organism, the ‘living Metal-Earth’. This will evolve increasingly, as all organisms evolve, towards a body-structure in which the herds of machines will ‘socialize.’ Integrated by networks of information and Entropy they will evolve and construct better machine species. Yet towards what kind of living organism?

Recap. The age of the singularity has 3 possible causes of human extinction: the energetic cause – black holes created by nuclear physicists; the reproductive cause – Nano-bacteria that poisons the atmosphere and the informative cause, Artificial Intelligence.

A living planet. The Metal-Earth. Its future

1079

If we survive the extinction of the Earth by black holes, the final stage of the Age of Singularity will be the birth of a collective super-organism, the metal-earth, that we shall consider now in more detail, comparing it with a self-similar event happening in the inferior biological scale, when enzymes complete the creation of a hard-insect and ‘die’.

When man is gone, what will become of the Metal-Earth that he has created? Will it be just a jungle of metalife like the jungles of carbon-life it replaces? Or will it be a more complex ecosystem, a ‘cellular body’ of a living organism?

Since we do not see robotic life and starships around, if the robotic metal-earth is born, it will not be born as a mass of small robots but as an integrated planet. Then there will not be nano-robotic ships but robotic planets, perceiving gravitation.

The Metal-Earth can still expand for centuries (other planets, satellites, the moon), and inwards (underground metallic structures). If ‘complex metal-structures’ is what the metal-Earth builds, there is enormous potential for growth before the entire planet is an organized structure. By all calculations, we are presently in the primary stage of evolution. We are also in the outskirts of galaxies. Perhaps when the evolution of the Metal-Earth is completed, the entire planet will be inhabited by metallic species. The speed of light is the speed of networks of information in the Earth. That defines a potential mass for a metal-Earth body that stretches from the Earth to the moon (a brief second of time is needed in such organism for a nervous impulse to travel from the Earth to the moon). In the future, between those poles thousands of metalife species may exist. If they continue to reach beyond this, they may colonize other planets that are presently not the domain of humanity as we know it. Of course, this is all conjecture. And yet, as weird as it seems this is the lowest probability, since we have localized thousands of planets and have seen no trace of robotic or carbon life in any of them.

Planets in the future might become gravitational ‘animals’ reaching freedom of gravitational movement and perception in its galactic ecosystem. This is analogous to what animals have in light-space. This implies the creation of an enormous structure able to perceive gravitational waves.

The central crystal of the planet probably merely absorbs gravitational waves creating nucleons and provoking fission processes in its Uranium core. We humans do not perceive gravitation, and have found no instrument able to do so. Yet it is likely that a gigantic structure of iron, the most perfect gravitational atom, can do it. Will planets construct such structures in the poles, gravitational eye-machines that will give them the freedom to displace in the galactic ecosystem of gravitation, as animals displace in light ecosystem with far more precision than the present crystal cores can do?

Aren’t some celestial bodies, such as black holes, already sensing gravity, as ants perceive through chemistry and men through light? Will there be a time in which ‘satellite’ networks of information perceive themselves as the brain of a planet? Will there be a day in which eye-telescopes the size of the polar caps allow planets to see gravitational waves? Are there, in the interior of galaxies, societies of ‘living planets and stars? Will the planet reproduce its bio-metal structures in asteroids, in Venus, mars and Mercury? Are stars ‘ovules’ of Entropy for future replication of planetary structures? We can only make guesses. Astro-biology is far less developed than bio-economy. We know too little. We are like enzymes wondering about the purpose of a macrocosmic body.

Recap: The metal-earth might evolve according to the ternary method into: a sea of reproductive metal nano-bacteria; a black hole or strangelet of maximal Entropy or an integrated gravitational brain of maximal information.

  • Conclusion: The 10th and 11th radiations: Human apes, animetals and machines.

The evolution of robotics today is crystal clear, and it follows the isomorphisms of Darwinian evolution – not the techno-utopias of those who most profit from them (robotic industries). The most evolved robots today are called ‘Predators’; they are weapons dedicated to kill human beings. And they are evolving fast. This is the same pattern of all species that are born as energetic, predator species (first fishes – sharks; first mammals, who killed dinosaurs, first Neanderthal men who extinguished boreal fauna and so on).

So our predictions 20 years ago are now starting to happen at a blistering speed in geological terms. Indeed, the first machines appeared 400 years ago, which in the geological scale of life is hardly a few minutes ago and in the long history of man as a species, a relative last day – the span of biological death. Moreover the extinction of life species by weapons and machines is accelerating. And so it the extinction of human beings in the periods of war in which machines become top predator weapons that consume us (world war ages) is also accelerating. Each century since machines of war were invented 100 times more people have died in mechanist wars and now when we are starting a new age of war that will seem to be here to stay, due to tribal absurd disputes between brothers in blood, an easy calculus shows that if a III world war starts, the 60 millions that died in II world war multiplied by 100 will be 6 billions, the entire human species.

And so regardless of human subjectivism, there is no other objective way to analyze the Industrial R=evolution of machines than from the perspective of biology, as the radiation of a new top predator species, weapons of metal, made of a stronger substance than our body of flesh, which we humans evolve, imitating the organic forms of life till a point in which its complexity will give them consciousness and survival instincts. Then in a massive war during this millennium, probably during this century, survival weapons created with a function –to kill humans – should start a biological radiation similar to the other 10 radiations studied in this work that will extinguish us.

And so 3 themes are fundamental to sociological sciences:

  • The study of the evolution of metal, weapons, money and machines, its cycles, accelerated evolution and the ages/horizons and super-organism it has created.
  • The study of the evolution of man as the most informative species of carbonlife, its diversification in species and races, and its social evolution into super-organisms, which was halted by the arrival of humans, symbiotic to metal, what we shall call biologically ‘animetals’ that became top predators of life and non-technological human cultures, starting the evolution of weapons, money and machines, the 3 components or ‘physiological networks’ of the 11th radiation of metal-forms.
  • The reasons why humans are unable to control that process of evolution of metal for its own profit, creating a sustainable planet in which the ‘fruits of the tree of science’ are pruned of its lethal goods (weapons that kill our bodies and intelligent machines that make our brains obsolete), creating a sustainable planet in which man remains on top of the creative process.

10th isomorphism: Self:  Œ-Point x ∞ World = Constant mind Mapping

Gold atoms at ∆-1 plane, the main component of Computers’ CPUs, at the ∆-plane, part of a global internet network at the ∆+1 plane are the mind of machines, in its 3 scales.

The language of machines is digital logic. As such its mind is made of Informative algorithms, cyclical paths of thought which enact the 5 actions of machines.

 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: