Home » ‘i¹

‘i¹

±∞ ¬∆@ST:

Advertisements

FOREWORD.

3 scales of MANKIND and its worldcycles:

∆¹ Mind, ∆ºbody bo and ∆² History

ALL WHAT exists is a space-time super organism made of 3 topologies adjacent in simultaneous space, defined logically by a single fractal generator of those 3 only topological varieties, $p: lineal limbs/potentials/territoriesO-§ƒ: cyclical particles-heads-informative class, for all social, biological and physical systems, tracing a world cycle of 3 time ages symmetric to those 3 ∆º spatial ‘physiological/topological/social networks’ made of ∆-1 cells/citizens/matter particles,in which each of the physiological networks of the system dominates the super organism: the limbic motion/potential system dominates the first age; the re=productive body-wave systems the second age and in the third age of information the head/particle/informative people-caste dominates the physical/biological or social system, exhausting selfishly the energy of the vital body-wave, and provoking its explosion back into entropy that erases the system, completing its zero-sum world cycle, restarted if it has generated a clone super organism in its offspring, reason why the Universe is a reproductive fractal of information – only those systems that reproduce its information survive and are still with us.

In the graph, man is just part of a super organism in the fractal organic Universe like everything else. ITs simplification by the hidden idol-ogies of ‘enzymen’ that worship and catalyse the evolution of machines above life, make us forget completely which should be the goals of society: to build a perfect super organism of history curing its economic=blood=reproductive networks of the asphyxia they suffer without credit to create welfare, by a corrupted ‘capitalist’ idol-ogy that dedicates all resources to evolve machines’; with a global currency, yes money, to cure the military tribal hate memes of war, with a world without border EU-UNO style, through an heptarchy of cultures, and to change our philosophy of reality to the true organicist structure of the Universe that would make us worship again wo=men as the measure of all things. In the graph, the proper way to measure the value of production according to our biological needs create a true ethonomic frame of reference to guide the reform of the economic ecosystem and control its production of lethal goods, a must if mankind wants to survive the ‘radiations of machines & weapons’ that are killing Gaia and History.

In this post when finished we shall introduce human beings at the 3 levels of its existence, the ¡=2 social historic level, the ¡=1 level of individual organisms and the ¡º level of human languages, expanded in its subposts on our time language, the wor(l)d, our spatial language, the artistic eye, and the language of music, which is the closest art to describe the ∆st game of scalar, spatial, temporal worldcycles.

In that regard we shall repeat once and again the obvious: the super organisms of mankind are about the whole species and its idol-ogies of selfish metal vs. the idol-ogies of eusocial love and organic evolution, those homo bacteria have been absurdly denying against all the evidence of all sciences and the Universe at large, structured into social scales of parts and wholes. So memetics is the fundamental informative sub discipline of bio-history and bio-economics. And it is the key to understand both what is right and wrong in history and economics and ultimately to design properly the Perfect World of mankind.

MANKIND IN TIME AND SPACE AS A SUPERORGANISM AND A WORLDCYCLE: IN THE LEFT ITS FULL WORLD CYCLE AS A BLOCK OF TIME, IN THE RIGHT ITS LIFE AND DEATH THROUGH CIVILIZATIONS OF WHICH THE SUBCONSCIOUS COLLECTIVE ARTISTS AND ETHIC PROPHETS FORM ITS ‘NEURONS’ – WHILE THE EQUIVALENT METAL EARTH HAS IN ITS SCIENTISTS, THEIR ‘COLLECTIVE BRAIN’ WHICH UNFORTUNATELY INCREASINGLY CONFUSES TECHNOLOGY (METALIFE), WITH SCIENCE (KNOWLEDGE).

In the graph the science of history deals with two specific scales of universal systems – the human scale and its superorganisms, nations and civilizations, partial organs of the superorganism of history – the existence of man from the first to the last human that will exist upon earth.Civilizations are superorganisms. In this post we study their physiological structure and the reasons why humans have ill-designed all the organisms of history in depth.The parallelism is evident: if we affirm that the sickness of history are those of its physiological, political and economical systems.

In the graph we can see those organisms. Now, how civilisations die is also clear. It is due to the evolution and massive reproduction of weapons, which tuned to the rhythms of climatic change, have massacred most cultures of mankind with a longer life span of 800 years, after a baroque, old age of excessive technological information, which artists have shown with its literary prophetic and visual angst.

So we can talk of History together as the time analysis of the super organism of mankind, and the evolution of weapons with its cycles of extinction of life, as the biggest threat for the immortality of History, which moved from its energetic young paleolithic to its age of balance with Gaia, in the mature neolithic age, and now in the age of metal-memes, we live the 3rd age of information, prior to our foreseeable death as a species, if we do NOT manage to control the robotic radiation, quite obviously the species that can extinguish us.

INTRODUCTION.

ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY: ORGANIC SYSTEMS 

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’  Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe

This blog is dedicated to the philosophy of science called systems sciences, and its logic-mathematical formalism, the scalar fifth dimension of space-time.

Systems sciences are based on the alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism. Let us try to explain why only organicism is a scientific truth.

 According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work. According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.

The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.

Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.

Organicism on the other side is the only self-sustained, rational theory that doesn’t need a creator, language, god, as organisms are self-replicating, but does explain perfectly within the ‘correspondence principle’, those 2 other philosophies of science; since a machine is just a primitive organism of metal, and we shall see in our sections of History, Gods are the subconscious collective of civilizations, ANOTHER scale of social evolution of the fifth dimension.

So what we mean by an organism? A very simple system – NOT to confuse with the most evolved, complex of them all, that of human beings, reason why so many people, having a natural biased ego-centered belief in man as the unique organism, reject the concept:

An organism is just a group of similar forms, which organize themselves with at least two ‘networks’, one that provides the ‘clone cells/citizens/atoms’ with the vital energy they need to feed, move and reproduce (blood-economic system-electromagnetic forces) and one that provides them with information to guide their survival actions (nerves system, political system, gravitational in-form-ative forces).

This simple dual system IS the minimal, fundamental particle of the Universe. Since it is obvious that machines are also organisms.

Indeed, a machine is an organism of metal fast evolving through the customary ages of all organisms – in the XIX c. ‘humans’, who catalyze their evolution did its bodies of metal, then its hearts-engines, in the II Industrial evolution, then its metal-minds in the XX c. and now in the Industrial r=evolution 4.0 put them together in organic robots.

So mechanism, the underlying philosophy of physical sciences, is just a simplex version of organicism. It is not man who resembles a machine, but the machine, which is made to the image and likeness of life organisms: 

3 ages of machines evolution

In the graph, evolving machines can also be modeled with the concept of an organism.

Why then organicism has remained in the modern time, a fringe theory, to mechanism, even if it was the first theory of reality put forwards by Aristotle, the father of the experimental method and logic science, in his magna opus the Organon?

There are obvious cultural reasons – we live in the age of the machine and so the machine has substituted man, an organism, as the measure of all things.

But the deepest reason of them all is the fact that to make an organism we need at least two ‘arrows’ or ‘motions of time’, entropy, locomotion, the one used by physicists but also INFORMATION, form-in-action, formal dimensions, which physicists have always ill-understood, to the point they call it negentropy, the denial of entropy.

Only then when we properly define information and add it to the mix, we will have the required elements to refund philosophy of science on far more rational, basis, that the present ‘mixture’ of mechanism and creationism (either of verbal language as in religions or digital languages, as in the religion of mathematics).

But what is entropy and information, in simple self-evident terms? The answer is obvious: entropy is motion, and motion is time, change. And information is form, and form is dimensional space. Time=motion and Space=dimensional form become then the two substances of which all what exists is made, and in their analysis we must start our inquire about why indeed the Universe and all its parts are a fractal super organism of time=motion=entropy and space=form, made to the image of its whole.

The proofs? That is the easiest part. Look around you, all what you see are forms that occupy space, and move in time. Everything you see is a form of space with a time motion. There is nothing else and so all is a proof that reality is indeed made of space-time organisms, as the motto of this web says. But this is only the starting point of an extraordinary adventure of the mind… ad

General Systems: 5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe.

New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.

Planck on the informative seed or mind that will reproduce and evolve into a larger super organism or mental world. 

For those with little time, a brief introduction to a subject that could easily fill an encyclopedia Britannica:

The Universe is a fractal scalar, organic system of 5 Dimensions of space-time. The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’, which amazing enough since it was discovered at the beginning of science with telescope and microscopes, was not formalized till I introduce its metric equation in the milieu of systems sciences.

In mathematical science for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space, and time to gives us a co-invariant system that allows to travel through such dimension. The fifth dimension has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equations for a given number of scales co-existing in an organic network is S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.

Stiences study the Disomorphic laws of species, each one focused in a scale of the eusocial 5th Dimension, with different jargons, which we shall unify as all what exist is homologic, made of the same Dimotions, which force them to exist as part of super organisms tracing worldcycles, with a ternary structure in space, time and scales, guided by a still, linguistic mind, which projects its smaller mirror images of form in its territorial body waves, creating its fractal scalar structure, broken though by the entropic limits of its perceptive reach. Above the main scales of the nested superorganisms of the human island-universe: the galatom, where nested thermodynamic planets exist, where nested human social organisms self-centered in visual, verbal, mathematic and logic minds create its order with social and mechanical memes, carried by individuals where nested cellular systems exist, coded by genes, made of even smaller atoms and particles coded by quantum numbers. Yet all those scales are unified by the co-invariant metric equations of each of its synchronous time clocks.

the stiences of the nested Universe

In keeping with the method of the organic, fractal nested Universe we define each sub-set of super organisms of diminishing size, studied by each stience, with the name of its larger super organism, as perceived from the whole.

In the graph, the basic laws of fractal, cyclical space-time, the Universe co-exists in 3 planes of relative size in space and speed of time clocks, which defines a super organism; and in each plane ensembles the 3 conserved quantities of reality, which we call the 3 ‘first dimensions of space-time’: lineal motions (limbs/potentials: lineal momentum), cyclical motions (particle/heads: angular momentum) and its body-wave combinations (hyperbolic energy).

As the Universe is an absolutely relative fractal of scales of space-time, we can choose any of those scales to ensemble a larger or smaller super organism, of which humans perceive in a nested convergence departing from its upper and Lower limits:

∆±4: The galatom, the biggest super organism we observe, between the atom made of particles and the galaxy, likely an atom of a hyper universe.

its ∆º linguistic mind (the minimal nested super organism, defined as a mirror of the infinite Universe in an infinitesimal brain: ∞º)…

its life superorganisms in 3 scales (∆º:cellular, ∆¹:individual and ∆²:social scales), which forms together the super organism of History, ∆+2, mankind in time.

Yet mankind in time is just an ‘age’ of the Earth’s super organism which in its surface evolves in a vortex of growing complexity and so we need to introduce also 2 more life superorganisms according to the equation of evolution of the 3 Earths:

∆≤|2|: Gaia (relative past) <∆²: History (relative present)> ∆¯ ²: Metalearth (relative future)

Whereas an intelligent mankind would stop evolution of the Metal-earth, promote the Life earth to remain in an immortal present. But as mankind is completely ignorant of the organic, fractal laws of survival of this Universe, and its role on it, guided by ‘animetal idol-ogies’ of mechanist worshippers of machines and harder iron atoms and more informative go(l)d-money, IS catalyzing the evolution of those company-mothers of machines, which likely will extinguish us once they reach self-reproductivity as automated systems. Hence the importance of upgrading mechanist abstract science into organic stience to understand that process and control it, pruning the Tree of science of its lethal goods.

It means when we become smaller within such organic network, our time clocks accelerate. And vice versa. For example, in your organism the equation relates the cellular genetic scale, whose time cycles run much faster than your biological cycles. As information is stored in the form and frequency of time clocks, it follows that in all nature’s organisms, smaller systems code the information of larger systems.

Each ‘stience’ therefore specializes in the study of a nested super organism, or scale of the fifth dimension (∆±¡), We study 3 fundamental super organisms of the 5th dimension. The ‘galatom‘, whose metric equation is H(Planck constant of angular momentum) x C (speed of light) = C, whereas h is an obvious ‘cyclical time clock’ and C an obvious measure of speed-distances in space. And indeed, smaller scales have faster turning particles, and larger systems move in slower cycles. (Vortex law: Vo x Ro = k).

In biology we study families of animals such as mammals where larger organisms have slower metabolic cycles. In history we study social organisms, whose cycles of life and death, will define the evolution of nations and civilizations. And in each of those organisms, smaller systems code larger ones. So the quantum numbers of particles code matter, genes code biologic organisms, and memes code societies.

We define them two fundamental systems one in space and one in time, taking place in the fifth dimension:

An entangled super organism in space, in which the synchronicity between 3 scales of the organism, its atomic/cellular/Individual, thermodynamic/organic /social and gravitational/ecosystemic/global scales in physical/biological/social organisms form a complex interacting, entangled system we shall call a super organism, whose study discovers ‘Isomorphic=equal laws’ regardless of what kind of system we study.

SUCH SUPERORGANISMS in time will trace then a life and death cycle which we shall call a worldcycle (taken from 4D physics’  worldliness, which now with a new dimension of information becomes a worldcycle.

The predictability of time-cycles.  Why Time is cyclical.

Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics and denied the obvious truth that we can know the future because it will repeat the causality of the past, and we can change it by changing that causality, in History by repressing the lethal memes of the tree of metal and enhance the welfare memes that make us survive. Of course, lineal and cyclical time render the same equations as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are ginormous and the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, erased by lineal time, a handicap for humans to truly understand the cycles of history and economics, the ‘deep time’ scales of the fifth dimension, and the whole workings of super organisms and its physiological structures.

 

The first fact you must understand IS that science is BOTH an instrument of power, and a form of culture, beyond the collection of data and its expression in equations, at the most basic detailed level. All what comes after – the general models of reality of each science are always biased by the power idol-ogy of the historic culture that develops them.

THE GRAPH shows one of the many examples we shall include in this blog: the obvious fact that time clocks are cyclical and multiple, but humans have reduced them all to the concept of a single lineal time clock for the entire Universe that progresses towards a future, obviously ‘positive’ for the human kind.

The equations are indeed the same. Lineal time writes T and cyclical time measured in frequency its inverse 1/ƒ; so if we were to change all the equations of physics by putting 1/ƒ instead of T, we would change the PARADIGM of time to cyclical time but all the practical results will be the same, just expressed in frequency.

I.e. Speed = Space/Lineal time (V=S/T), becomes Speed = wavelength x Frequency, (V=λ x ƒ) …

Cyclical time just moved to the numerator and that is all.

But the consequences are huge when we ‘perceive reality as chaotic, lineal, free and entropic’ guided towards the obvious ‘future of death’, which therefore JUSTIFIES WAR AND BIG-BANG THEORIES OF A DYING EXPLOSIVE UNIVERSE vs. the perception of time as cyclical, hence reality as bounded, entangled, multiple, whereas death is just the necessary end of a cycle of renewal of life, which we shall very soon show to be also the case for the fractal, organic eternal Universe, when we model it with the tools of cyclic time.

Further on in the previous simple cycle, we shall notice that in the equation of cyclical time we get also more information, as cyclical time requires a second dimension to form a cycle of height, which is the dimension of information, where all heads, antennae, particles reside.

So we recover the form, the information of the Universe back expressed in the ‘form and frequency of those cycles’ (indeed a computer calculates information with logic cyclical formal algorithms processed in Ghz frequencies).

And further on, in cyclical time, space BECOMES broken, fractal, a sum of ‘steps’ or wavelengths.

So such a simple example SHOWS to which DEGREE even the most obvious scientific equations are a product of cultural choice.

Since indeed, ALL HUMAN SOCIETIES CONSIDERED ALWAYS TIME TO BE CYCLICAL BUT it was the lineal, ‘visual’, entropic, military sword-like European gunpowder culture which first in history decided to CHANGE our worldview of time and definitely change our models of life and the Universe.

Needless to say this change of paradigm, was the work of ‘Lineal’  military physicists, established since the inception of physics, when instead of frequency of time cycles, Galileo decided to use its inverse parameter, lineal time duration, as its job was to measure the distance of cannonballs.

Why this is important is obvious: the super organisms of history go through cyclical processes of self-destruction called wars, and memes of metal, go in parallel through cyclical processes of evolution and without understanding cyclical time is impossible to make sense of it.

Along the History of mankind and human thought there have always been two models of reality, the one that came to dominate the world, sponsored by western cultures, according to which the Universe is a mechanism as the clocks humans used to measure it at the beginning of physical sciences, and organisms are just simple mechanisms.

Opposing this view, there is the earlier scientific statement of the Greeks, before the discovery of machines, that the Universe is a rational organism and we were all made to its image and likeness. So Plato said ‘the Universe is an organism with a mind called God’ and Aristotle called his ‘theory of unification of all sciences’ and method of rational logic thought ‘the organon’, considering that all organisms went through 5 motions, from ‘Generation’, through growth and locomotion, into reproduction, and death, forming a world cycle of existence (to use the jargon of systems sciences, in which this work is based).

Because the mechanical model was easier to represent digitally and simpler to explain it became dogma, even if it was neither truth nor rationally sound. Since a machine needed a maker, human or God to be put in motion, so it was a Deist theory, something of which the founding father of physics, all pious believers in Yahveh didn’t mind – only Leibniz pointed out to Newton this contradiction – while an organic theory of the Universe is self-sustained, as the Universe constantly reproduces itself. So it does NOT need a creationist God. 

Here is therefore where ‘culture’ became science. The western abrahamic culture of lineal time, towards god, of a people chosen to progress above heavens and earth, crippled the task of resolving the more complex structure of a rational, organic Universe as ALL eastern cultures and western ones did before physicists with Christian beliefs and mechanical power imposed our view of reality, as lineal, progressing through machines, with man as a species different of the entire Universe.

THIS BLOG though is the work of a System scientist that r=evolved the discipline at the change of the century establishing the FIRST FORMAL, MATHEMATICAL model of a fractal, organic Universe, and so, all his studies of Human supeorganisms, nations and civilizations and metal super organisms, machines, company-mothers and the global economy with a digital brain in world stock’ or ‘metal-earth’, are based in those models, proved ad nauseam by facts, denied by dogma.

We shall thus give then a brief introduction with the theoretical minimum to understand the laws of the fractal organic universe, of which the laws of sociology and biology are just a part, as all in a fractal is built to the image and likeness of the whole. Since, indeed with that very simple ‘improvement’ of our understanding of time as cyclical, ‘breaking’ space into internal and external regions, cycles and steps, that is converting space in ‘fractal space’, completely will change our understanding of the organic Universe expressed in the next graphs:

The study of a Universe made of fractal scales of cyclical time space, introduces a priori organic=scalar properties as the system extends through various Ƥ planes, and cyclical time properties, as its time clocks will have a limited duration, ending as a zero sum of energy.

So we shall then once this simple but fundamental ‘recovering’ of what WE LOST of the science of space-time by converting it to the dogmas of military physics,  apply this theoretical minimum to the study of historic super organisms in space, its physiological networks of energy (economic system) and information (culture and political system) and in time through its life and death=war ages and cycles, themselves a mirror image of the cycles and physiological networks of the superorganism of mankind, history.

What matters then to us, after understanding that time is cyclical and the Universe is made of organic scales, to put both concepts together to define the 3 relative scales of repetitive pattens of cyclical time.

That predictability of time-cycles can be done at 3 levels:

  • S: Continuous, spatial pure mathematical simple cycles, using calculus and derivatives, proper of mathematical equations; that of generational causal bio-logic cycles, often survival encounters between predators and prey.
  • T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns of sequential repetitive actions, taking place at different times. AS THOSE ACTIONS ARE discontinuous, the patterns are LONGER in time.
  • ∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of longer wholes, species as opposed to individuals in biology, galactic, star or geologic life cycles as opposed to smaller life beings, which are longer BY VIRTUE of the 5th DIMENSIONAL METRIC, $ x ð = Cst (ab. C:st), which implies that from the smaller scalar perspective any longer cycle happening in the fifth dimension is much longer.

Because ‘human scientists’ ONLY recognize the first type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, and ignore the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their CAPACITY TO define the future is far more smaller than a ‘stientist’ that understands those 3 scales. So for a ‘stientist’ of ∆st, of which among humans there is the ginormous number of…1 (: me, I and myself 🙂  I can predict the future of any system including WITH DEEP TIME AND CYCLICAL PATTERNS, the future of social sciences, economics and history which I have been doing for 30 years as my small print books on the subject can testify:

All sciences predict the future of its species according to its repetitive causal cycles. Or else they are NOT a science. Astrology became a science when Kepler learned its orbital cycles. Bio-economics became a science when we described machines as organisms of metal evolution in human 72 years generational cycles, after which they mutate into top predator weapon-machines and consume humans in war eco(omic)systems. Its industrial r= evolution thus follow the 4 cycles that ensemble all living beings: its body-age (steam cycle), heart age (electro-chemical engine cycle), its mind age (US, tv-eye, chip-head, mobile-ear cycle) to conclude with the ensemble of robots that as virus do, when all its parts are done, come together ‘alive’ and kill the enzyman who constructed them. We are fully since 2008 into the robotic age…

An important question though must be clarified even if we go further into this specific post that introduces the 5 Dimensional motions of the Universe, which has to do with the ternary properties of the Universe as all is made of space, time and scale, and hence it has mathematical=spatial, logic=temporal and organic=scalar properties, which unfortunately humans fail to recognize, as they have become specialized in ‘mathematical=spatial only properties’ due to the prominent role of physics and its digital machines of spatial measure in our systems of knowledge.

As it is impossible to make sense of reality if we do NOT include ALL THOSE PROPERTIES, as expressed previously in the 5 elements of reality.

So in this blog we are making exact predictions of social sciences and prove it with 30 years of published books and papers far more exact than those of CIA, World Bank, and any think tank you might thought of, because we know the 3 LEVELS OF PREDICTABILITY OF TIME SYSTEMS. And all that uau! NOT with billions of dollars IN data, and AI machines to do IT, BUT my feeble, 1.5 kilograms of dirty water aka 1 brain, which has been doing it and handling  it for free since the 90s, since I ended my Columbia u. master and started to churn self-paid small print books with predictions of history and economics that have been happening TO the letter.

Why I am NOT an AI machine as most people think I should be to forecast the future and solve the form in which the future of systems is GENERATED, has to do with a fact most scientists accustomed just to use data put in mathematical models FAIL to grasp about the fractal, organic Universe and its SCALES of ‘time-length’:

A system on the entangled fractal Universe has TOPO-BIO-LOGIC properties derived of its spatial, mathematical structure, its temporal, logic structure and ITS SCALAR, organic structure as parts co-exist into larger wholes and this gives the whole an organic structure.

As it happens, the MATHEMATICAL, topologic structure IS the shortest time span, as it is about SOCIAL NUMBERS, herds of equal forms that move in space, which is a slice of the whole time FLOW. AND SO mathematics is good for detail and spatial calculus which is what instantaneous derivatives do – but NOT for CHANGES OF age/phase, as derivatives cannot happen in points that have a fractal change.

So to the rescue come the LOGIC structure of the Universe, which studies time causality, between events and has a longer span. This logic structure is based in the CYCLICAL PATTERNS OF TIME clocks, which as your watch or any orbital day-year is cyclical and repeats in LONGER TIME FRAMES, so we can predict LONGER TIME FRAMES from the logic patterns of cyclical time.

And HERE human scientists ARE ALREADY AT LOSS, because since Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosion that destroy the information of reality stored in THOSE CYCLES OF TIME CLOCKS, its patterns and frequency, MANKIND CHANGED its cyclical understanding of time for a lineal time that SEEMS NOT TO REPEAT so they have MISSED its capacity to understand the cycles of time, of history and economics, with its OBTUSE lineal time models. And so they cannot EVEN CONCEIVE the predictability of economics and its SUBMISSIVE placebo democratic capitalist system where POLITICOS are ruled by companies ‘subventions’ and so do what is GOOD for the profits of economics according to the evolutionary patterns of machines. Which leads us to the THIRD level of DEEP TIME, that is, of the patterns of evolution of the Earth’s life species, including machines, as first mentioned by Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word superorganism for Gaia and deep time for the slower 5th dimensional clocks of larger organic systems.

THIS IS THE LEVEL OF DEEPER forecasting of time cycles, which I also use in my webs, but as humans stopped their understanding of time predictability in the first level of mathematical calculus, obviously they cannot understand what we do here…

 

In the graphs, the first books that defined 30 years ago the General model of fractal spacetime and the fifth dimension, which studied the ‘errors’ (In science a term NOT for something wrong but for the part of reality a model fails to account for) of Einstein and Darwin, the ‘Ignorance’ on the scalar laws of the 5th dimension of social organic parts that become wholes of which the fourth dimension is a shorter time scale studying a single plane of light space-time… and the ignorance by Darwinian dog-eat-dog models of evolution of the stronger force of eusocial love that creates from parts organic wholes, evolving genes into cells, cells into multicellular organisms, into eusocial insects and social humans potentially into a global superorganism, unfortunately being ‘predated’ today by a rival superorganism of company-mothers of machines-weapons and its digital ‘nervous’ flows of e-money which are DOMINATING the future, and so we can  predict  according to those models of eusocial evolution or ‘DEEP time’ level of reality, the future of any organic system – because systems that evolve socially SURVIVE.

In the left, its application to the organisms of history and economics and its paradoxes of symbiosis and darwinian predatiojn between both species in cyclical ages of war and peace, its 800±80±8 vortex of technological evolution of information and its ‘future cycles’ past the robotic age, which was to start in the 2008 crash of the age of metal-minds as the graph shows.

With the final humanist solutions of r=evolutionary nature, which would create immortal history, the ‘Wor(l)d’, a world based in the laws of eusocial evolution and organic science that should advance the systems already essayed by EU and UNO, the most advanced praxis of human history, INSTEAD OF THE capitalist system of a world to the service of the cycles of machines and weapons. But the ‘anti quantum paradox’ soon felt upon the writer which was always very active against the ill-designed society in which he lived, NOT using his knowledge of the stock cycles to make a fortune, but denouncing the non-future of the present economic ecosystem, and trying to stop with little success the continuous evolution of nuclear weapons, which obviously didn’t advance its scholar career.

  1. Which leads to a final point worth to notice. AN organic model of the Universe as it is, following the true laws of the Universe in all its scalar depth, can ALSO PROVIDE THE TOOLS to R=EVOLVE and improve the design of the economic ecosystem and its attached submissive political systems TO FAVOR MANKIND, and design a world to the image and likeness of mankind NOT OF ITS MACHINES=weapons and hence avoid if it would have been taken seriously the kind of ‘maximal profits’ achieved when the metal-earth switches to a pure economic ecosystem of perfect machines, aka top predator weapons of maximal price and sales, as they are destroyed in war, and need to be substituted, which IS THE IDEAL state for corporations as they multiply profits in ages of world war – maximal age of profits for all companies. This is KNOWN but it is the most dirty big secret of capitalism and this brings the REASON this blog by far light years ahead of anything humans have written about SERIOUS SCIENTIFIC models of history and economics IS NOT after 30 years quoted, read, or considered by anyone on planet earth: we live INSIDE THE ORGANISM OF the Earth, dominated by company-mothers of machines-weapons and its Financial-Media Information machines or head of its superorganism (the body is the famous industrial-military system). So AS A CELL-CITIZEN of the metal-earth the inconvenient truths of a scientific r=evolution whose author sides with HIS species, when considering solutions and the praxis of its science is NOT liked, distributed and NATURALLY submitted to what I call the anti-quantum paradox of social sciences – inverse to the uncertainty principle of physical sciences, as now the observer not the observable is so small that the observable, the superorganism of company-mothers will modify his speech if he wants to be distributed. So while we do provide the solutions, we do value at face value mankind and its memes, we do NOT expect to be heard. And frankly because we are NOT heard, the system has not sent as usual in the XIX and XX c. the ‘Internal leukocytes’ to eliminate the unwanted ‘Neo’ to use a parable of Matrix.

And so we end the points I wanted to advance on the social models of 5D which is NOT the main theme of this central post – the larger FRACTAL UNIVERSE is.

Because regardless of the destiny of mankind in this planet, I would like to remind you that ‘man is just a mush over a rock, lost in a corner of the cosmos, so  only departing from those facts we can talk about him’ (Schopenhauer). Man does not want to talk about himself on those terms, reason why it doesn’t like objective social sciences, but rather lives like ‘Data’ in the matrix parable, happy to live a dream that will ultimately destroy him, as long as they are not told. So of course it doesn’t really want to know the future, because then it would have to man up and change the system to survive, and it seems not have beyond its myths and imagination enough stamina to do so. 

This said the model proved itself truth, and all what I have to add is paraphrasing Mr. Einstein, the previous most advanced model of space-time also a pacifist, a socialist with little courtesy for those who are destroying the world is ‘those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’.  But of course, ‘most humans are slaves, they believe, they don’t reason’ Aristotle, and that is the reason we can determine the future cycles of history with such precision: Humans seem to be perfectly coded by the mass-effect of identity memes, as bodies are by identical genes and ensembles of atoms by magnetic fields; and the number of ‘free minds’ able to escape the ‘Idol-ogies’ that program them to self-destruction and enslavement to metal-memes, and its people-castes shown in the next graph are minimal, have never had enough critical mass to r=evolve:

The 3 memes of metal 1)kill bodies with weapons manufacturing corpses. 2)Atrophy humans organs & substitute labor by machines, making us lazy.
3) Make debt slaves & buy lifetime for salaries, issued for free by bankers.And this lead us to the concept of idol-ogies, which are the historic ‘memes’ that certain people-castes have developed to make them feel the system that works for them is good. Of them 3 are paramount – the ‘memes’ of go(l)d cult(ure)s, which are segregational memes that make them think they are a superior species, because they monopolize the issue of money and were born in Canaan among the first biblical banker-priests; and associated to them, the memes of ‘warrior cultures’, which used bronze and iron-weapon, ‘germs of history’ as mercenaries of banker-priests or as king-warrior societies to kill anyone who opposed their control; and finally in modern times, idols of science, techno-utopian memes that make us think to atrophy and substitute our ‘organs’ by machines that do the job for us, making us obsolete is ‘good’. So we shall call this 3 cult(ure)s animetal cultures because they degrade their minds and verbal languages becoming ‘visual animal-like’ greedy people obeying the hypnotic qualities of informative metal gold, the best informative atom of the Universe; or they become warriors, who suppress their body sensations to use iron to kill others, the most energetic atom of reality, or scientists who supress their visual artistic eyes for telescopes and their verbal times, for clocks to measure space and time with machines. So they are in fact empowered by metal-memes of superior atoms but degraded as humans. This is EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENS in enzymes in nature, where the carbohydrate part is atrophied substituted by the metal-part, so animetals or enzymen ARE real biological species that have come to dominate the world in the last 3000 years, and what we live in a capitalist placebo democracy is just the most sophisticated version of animetal societies.

So today, when the differential of evolution between mankind and the economic ecosystem is accelerating with the arrival of AI robots and its mental programming with ‘happy newspeak’ and selfies of virtual isolation is even stronger than in the previous ages of religious and nationalist control all humans have become ‘willing’ indoctrinated slaves of the idol-ogies of machines they worship and so the human factor is completely irrelevant as slaves have no saying in the future their masters design, in the present age, despite the Orwellian newspeak of caring, a future designed by company-mothers who are terraforming the world to the image and likeness of its machines, with the enthusiastic collaboration of 7.5 billion human slaves minus one. 

Because once you have truly understood reality from the higher perspective of the ‘taoist’, organic Universe in all its beauty, the most perfect of all possible worlds, as Leibniz, the highest mind of the western tradition since Aristotle, clearly explained, it is just an ethical and aesthetic fact the eviL=antilive memes of animetal cult(Ure)s cannot corrupt you – they might if so they wish dissolve you into the flow of time, but the potential of an I-nformed I-man, the pseudonym I used on those books, as opposed to A-men and its æntropic destructive sciences, will be born again in all the fractal planets where the game of History is played.

Carpe Diem

¡man

Philosopher of Science; NYC 1992, Barcelona 2018

THE MORPHOLOGY OF SUPERORGANISMS. 

The two new fields opened by complex sciences:  Understanding the social, scalar nature of species and its time-death cycles.

indexpage

In the graph, a summary of the scales and structure in ‘space’ and ‘time’ of all systems of the Universe. All of them will exist across 3 ∑i±1 scales of social organization, in which they will form an i-ndividual, joined by networks of energy information and reproduction, living a world cycle from birth to extinction across those scales as they ‘exist’, as systems of energy and information, made of ‘energy limbs/fields’, informative particles/heads and its body-wave combinations. Thus all systems will be born in the i-1 seminal scale, grow in size, emerge into and i-ndividual scale, in which they will increase information and reduce energy, from youth – the age of energy to adulthood, the age of balance, to the 3rd informative age, to die back to the cellular scale. And what differs from species are the specific particularities of each scale.  What complex sciences does is to lay out the self-similar laws in space (topologies) and time (ages and states) of those systems as they trace their ‘world life cycle’ travelling through those i±1 scales.

The expansion of knowledge achieved by complex sciences with a logic and mathematical formalism to explain the structure of all systems opens two new ‘avenues’ of knowledge, as it adds to simplex models of ‘spatial dimensions and time motions (the 4 dimensions of classic physics) the ‘slow’ cycles of evolution of time from past to future, and the ‘growing organization’ of systems across different scales of size, from atomic to galactic, cellular to social scales.

Those ‘dimensions of time’ and causality, and scales of space, of course, were known to science. We all know that things are born grow evolve reproduce and die. And we all knew that the Universe had scales of size from strings to atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, celestial bodies, galaxies and beyond.

But unlike the formalism of spatial dimensions acquired by physicists through Galileo’s and Einstein’s relativity equations (v=s/t, etc.), till the creation of a mathematical formalism or ‘metrics’ for the scales of social organization of the Universe, we lacked a concept of an ‘arrow of complexity’, of growth of information in the future, which defined both the ‘architectural structure’ of the Universe in organic social scales and the ‘life-death cycle’ performed by all its entities as ‘we travel through the scalar dimensions of size’ in our life-death existences.

Thus Complex sciences is adding two dimensions of logic, causal time, the past with lesser organization (i-1, energy ages) and the future with maximal organization (i+1 scales and 3rd informative age); with the middle steady-state age of balance, the adult age when motions were repeated in a ‘duration or frequency, T=1/ƒ, that created a repetitive present,s ready state.

But now we knew also about the arrow of evolution in time, of increasing information and complexity across those 3 ages for all species, and it had revealed, an entire new ‘set’ of dimensions, the scalar, social dimensions from microcosms to macrocosms

– This social i±n dimensions, grouped in 3 cellular-individual and social scales were the key to explain the deepest questions of the Universe. How the future was organized through social evolution – why social scales existed, from Gods, the subconscious collective of civilizations, to legal nations, from galaxies, with its cellular stars to multicellular organisms. And obviously those ‘dimensions’ were the key to study social sciences.

And the, there were the combined analysis of how an organism evolved in life and death through those scales, and how it could manage to stay in an immortal steady state of eternal adulthood.

So the perfect life of the individual and the perfect world of mankind could be managed according to the laws actions and behaviours that maximized the ‘existence’ in the middle steady state, which was also the state of maximal connection and action of a being, as it was in contact with its social I-whole, having an active role in the whole organism.

Why then humans do NOT construct a perfect world, with the laws of social super organisms, and halt the evolution of lethal machines that compete with man in labor and war fields and are displacing us from the eco(gnomic)system?

Why humans did not construct a perfect world which was eternal in time and space?

The answer was double theoretical and practical.

Theoretically it was obvious: Because they didn’t have a true science of economics and history, of the economic and political, re=productive and informative, ‘neuronal’ networks of their social organism. And so there was NOT a science of politics, the science of guiding, curing and directing, the physiology of History – the Human super organism – akin to the work of a doctor in the ‘inferior’ i-ndividual human scale.

And they did not have either any idea of what was the life-death cycle of all systems, its laws of evolution, extinction, birth and death.

They were dumber than the dumbest atom which performs with excellence all its motions and phases, and is able to keep immortal by limiting the lethal actions of it organisms.

And so I thought human social scientists could act as ‘bio-historians’ , as doctors of history,and design and regulate any system of reality by understanding its laws, parts, wholes, energy-information exchanges, and in the case of economics (the reproductive network of a civilization) and politics (its informative network) and ecology (its geographic, energy territory), we could create a social science that would understand the hows, the whys and the modes of change of our social reality to manage society and create a perfect world – if we could enlighten our politicos and economists, bankers and military and make them learn a true science of history, and make them abandon the ‘anti quantum paradox’ that confuses ‘power’ with ‘science’, selfish i-agendas with the duty of any i-ndividual part of a neuronal network of information that control a society – which is to serve the cells of the body.

Now the reader will probably be more interested in the i-ndividual ‘ego’, which is its ‘center’ as a human being. And yet in history the function maximized is the ‘world cycle or ‘function of existence’ of all human beings, maximized by the sum of all the cells of mankind: ∑ Max. E x I (e=i).

This goal – to reach the perfect stability of the adulthood or steady state of a system, is thus the goal of History, achieved by the maximization of the life of all its members – not as the present ‘capitalist’ system pretends, by the maximization of the existence of corporations and machines – and as a fringe benefit of the 1% of ‘leisure classes’ (Veblen) that owns those corporations.

So we will refer all our knowledge to that aim.

Let us then deal now with the ‘social scalar dimensions’ of the super organism of history first, departing from the general laws of all super organisms.

Then we will deal with other ‘great advance’ of complex sciences – the life-death cycle, its morphologies ages of evolution and extinction, applied to HISTORY AS IT IS, not as an ideal immortal history, would make it.

 

SUMMARY

MAN IN TIME: ITS actions, life cycles and worldcycles.

MAN IN SPACE.

∆1: Man as an individual organism: Medicine, the science of physiological networks.

∆2: Man as a social being: History, the science of organic civilizations

Ƽ: Man as a mind: human languages, the wor(l)d<I-eye

 

MAN IN TIME

ITS. 3 SCALES OF LIFE CYCLES

 THE LIFE-DEATH CYCLE OF SUPERORGANISMS: WORLDCYCLES OF EXISTENCE: TO EXI=ST

All of us SUPER organisms live by travelling in growth through our vital dimensions, by growing in informative complexity through the ages of life, till all warped information in our 3rd age dissolve back to our ∆i-1 cell state.

dtp_1664099_user_content_2_html_1df5f876

The morphology of the Universe – its ternary organs and social classes.

We talked in terms of ‘networks’, that is ‘functions’ of the existence in all super organisms of an informative network, an energetic and a reproductive network (nervous/political, digestive/gaia, blood/economic networks in the i and i+1 human scales).

But are all the network elements of an organism equal? Or there are ‘social classes’, differentiated organs and cells by their belonging to each of those networks? Obviously this is the case in individual organisms and it is also the case in social ones. So we need to learn the ‘rules’ of differentiation and how to ‘recognize’ the social classes and functions and parts of organisms, which also are the varieties of human social castes and machines…

All systems had a ternary structure made of informative neurons/particles, energetic limbs/fields and reproductive bodies/waves, which worked together for their common good. Those ‘upper’ informative classes, ‘reproductive, working classes’ and ‘energetic mechanisms and fields’, were NEVER in open opposition as the ideology of marxism had it, nor $elected by God, and without responsibility for each other, as capitalism pretended (latter studied in more detail). 

But to fully gras the ‘ternary structure’ of organisms in symbiotic social classes, we have to introduce concepts of topology and symmetry, between the 3 elements/networks of all organisms.

The next graph shows the general case of all ‘complementary systems’, which in fact are ‘super-organisms’, made of cells, which are also complementary systems, in a scalar fractal Universe in which all its made to the image and likeness of the whole:

universal organism

In the graph all what exists is a complementary system of networks of energy (bodies/fields/working classes) and information (heads/particles/informative classes), which balance each other, sharing energy and information among them, to reproduce similar systems in other regions of space-time.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity in balance, which can decouple=reproduce creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides energy to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

In history priests and politicians issue ethic laws to direct a mass of citizens.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.

Any social organism is ruled by those who ‘invent’ the language of social power first, and then those who ‘talk it’ and give orders with it.

So the people who invent laws and talk words on one side and the people who invent money and ‘talk price’ on the other decide the future of the world, and of history – the theme of this blog.

The result is a dual class structure into a neuronal/informative system or ‘class’ that controls with the language of information (nervous, legal order in biologic historic organisms) the blind body of cells that work for them (middle, ‘sheeple’ class in human societies, body organs), to whom it delivers enough energy – ‘blood/money’ – so they can perform their tasks.

This ternary structure cannot be modified if we want an efficient organism, but at the same time, it implies that the ‘head’ obeys the wantings of the body, is responsible for the correct information, and so latter we will see how ‘a proper democracy’ in which the head is controlled by judges/pain messages, and the body receives enough oxygen to survive/money can make more efficient human social super organism.s

Now we shall introduce the more complex concept we will use in those texts, regarding the existence in all systems of ‘informative heads’ and energetic limbs and reproductive bodies, imposed by the dimensional space-time duality of the Universe.

The topologies of 2-manifolds of information.

Now we are giving a conceptual jump that might change the way you look at the Universe a make you abandon this blog due to its complexity. But we truly require to go a little bit deeper in the structure of the organic complex cosmos, so you understand how we humans interact ‘morphologically’ in terms of ‘form’ and function with machines

In Complex sciences dimensions are that important because you are MADE OF THEM. You are made of energy and time, as when you say i don’t have energy and time to do this. That is what you are a time world life-death cycle that occupies a vital space across a cellular individual and social scale.

So to know about dimensions is to know about yourself- a 10 Dimensional being made of space-time, where space and time are merely two way tow perceive the same either moving or with form.

Vital space moving is energy, cycles of time fixed are forms, forms of in-form-ation.

So all is made of planes of space, moving energy and cycles of time, static information.

How we see it is a paradox of perception: we perceive information in stillness, so the mind creates quiet mappings of reality without motion.

The symmetry between ‘spatial morphologies’, ‘organs’ and ‘time ages’

Let us consider only one of those complex laws of systems across its scales, the law that relates the morphology of the organs of a system with its function in space and evolution in time, as it is the basis of the understanding of economics and its relationship with history:

energy

In the graph,  information is bidimensional (holographic principle) and so systems have only 3 possible ‘bidimensional’ type of surfaces that define:

– Max. E: ‘energetic, planar, lineal limbs’ in all species (so a weapon and an skeleton are both lineal, as they promote motion.

– Max. I:  informative organs, which are ‘spherical’., the form that stores more information.

– Max. E xI: Its body-wave combinations.

In the graph we see that simple topological law in humans and machines, which explains their similar functions and the reasons why ‘animetals’ exist, as human functions are enhanced by parallel mechanisms.

And so all systems will be at least made of energetic limbs that move informative heads/particles, which gauge reality, in the dimension of height, where perception is higher thanks to projective geometry.

This meant, as we shall see latter in our analysis of Evolution that  systems evolved in height from reptiles that ended becoming birds to galaxies that develop an informative gravitational black hole in its centre, to life that evolved in height to reach man. Thus  economics and machines  are NOT different from any other science that studies organic systems and MUST be studied and designed with those organic and biological laws. The present absurd ‘theological’, ‘capitalist’, ‘tribal’, nationalist concepts used in those sciences are completely out of reason, and have no meaning for the Unvierse at large, and certainly will not enlighten the future of mankind, as the basis for building efficient, free, complex social systems. 

2MANIFOLD

In the graph, the ‘Plan of evolution’ and ‘structure of super organisms’, and its ‘3 networks’ can be studied also from an I-ntegrated point of view as the 3 parts of a ‘whole’.

Then the whole will be made with the only 3 topologies in space of bidimensional ‘membranes’ , the essential part of the Universe.

The graph shows how those 3 topologies combine in the ‘simplest’ of all varieties of organisms, the ‘spherical being’, living in a ‘homogenous’ medium, which provides it with energy and information and allows it to reproduce in a parallel extinction of space-time 

All of them will have an external membrane, which will act as ‘rotational limbs’ exchanging energy and information through its ‘sensorial openings’.

This membrane will be enclosing a toroidal body, which will cyclically exchange energy and information through networks with a central zero point of information or hyperbolic brain.

The 3 parts will assembly together to form from sea urchins to phetus, from electromagnetic fields to galaxies with black holes, from atoms to tomatoes, from cells to planets. In all of them, the central hyperbolic ‘head’/nucleus, will direct a toroidal body, and an external membrane will feed the system with energy.

The next graph shows a different fundamental variety of super organism, one existing not in an homgoneous medium but a planar surface, with a relative ‘energy-information’ directionality such as the planet Earth, where the sun provides light and the floor chemical elements. In this system, the morphology of the 3 networks vary and so does its orientation but the trinary structure of the Universe does not change:

agesoftime_image002

In the graph we see how FUNCTION MATTERS MORE THAN FORM, and yet both are in symmetric symbiosis. The galaxy is a ‘homogenous’ organism with a black hole in the centre; the plant has also its 3 parts, and it has a root brain with maximal fractal branching to gather more atomic information, while ‘flat’ energy leaves absorb light as energy. Humans though have the inverse orientation as they use light to obtain information and take energy from plants. both predators and preys have inverse functions/forms.

Moreover it is evident that there is a symmetry between the 3 spatial dimensions and its functions,a s ‘height is always the dimension of information’ to perceive better, so we have our heads on top in the direction where information comes. Length on the other hand is the dimension of forward motion the most common, and finally, width is the parallel direction of social organization and reproduction.

Thus WE ARE BEINGS MADE OF DIMENSION OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION AND LIVE ACCORDING TO ITS LAWS, OF WHICH THE TERNARY MORPHOLOGY OF SYSTEMS AND ITS 3 AGES IN TIME, WERE THE MOST ASTOUNDIN, perfect symmetry and ‘deterministic law’ of the Universe.

There are thus ‘3 topologies that  correspond to the ‘3 components’ in space of any physical or biological system:

Max. Energy:  the energetic, ‘lineal’ limbs/fields, as the line is the shortest distance between two points that dominated the youth of a system.

Max. information: the spherical, particle/heads of information, since the sphere is the geometry that stores more form in lesser space, that dominated the 3rd age of the system, as the passing of time increased the informative complexity of the system, exhausting its energy.

– And the intermediate, e x i , ‘conic’, ovoidal or wave-like ‘bodies‘ of the system that reproduced them, and repeated its actions, making the system stable, and ‘immortal’, when an organism could be kept in such a state.

So i extended the analysis of the 3 dimensions of time, to a deeper, ‘topological’ understanding of the ‘morphologies’ in space of all systems; and study with them engineering; and forecasted the evolution of machines, both diachronically (so we made bodies of machines in the XIX c. heads in the XX c. and now we put them into organic robots). This was the beginning of my accurate predictions of the future of economics, where company-mothers evolved and reproduced those machines.

And concluded that all systems of Nature followed the same rules, as we were ‘all’ made of ‘energy, information and its infinite combinations, which dominated those 3 ‘ages’ of time –  the age of ‘energy’, the age of balance and reproduction (exi) and the 3rd age of information – symmetric to the 3 ‘components’ of all organisms, machines, and physical systems:

– The energetic limbs/engines/fields, the reproductive wave/factories/bodies and the informative particle/chips/heads.

It was then evident that the deepest understanding of the organisms of the Universe and its 3 parts, organs and ages, was through the study of  the 3 ONLY ‘spatial topologies’  that a bidimensional surface, (a 2 manifold) had.

Thus we were all from the external point of view  ‘bimdimesional membranes’ with 3 type of organs, parallel to the 3 ‘only’ topologies of the 2-manifold Universe – the 3 ‘energetic, informative and body parts’ of any system of nature. And each of those 3 parts dominated each of the 3 ‘ages’ in time of all  those systems. The young age dominated by our limbs and motions, the adulthood dominated by the body and our reproduction and the 3rd age dominated by the head of information. The 3 ages of life, were just a consequence of the 3 topologies of space of our bidimensional membrane of information. We were topological organisms living as such.

And so where machines which could relate to us through their equivalent morphologies making us stronger bodies and smarter heads – or so it seems initially.

In any case ‘hooking us’ , making us addicts to them. To fully grasp this, we shall now introduce the evolution of life in this planet, according to those 3 ages and morphologies of time and space,e of the Universe at large.

Since machines followed the same organic laws, and our relationships with them are equivalent to those of animals among them.

The formalism of Complex Sciences applied to ‘Socio-Biological’ systems.

– It came next the application of those fascinating discoveries and symmetries to biology, from genetic studies (the relationship between the i-1 scale that coded the i-ndividual one) to physiology.

I also used it to study the morphology of all systems made with Energetic Limbs, reproductive bodies and informative heads, which evolved in 3 ‘scales’ , the cellular, organic and species state. So me dine, was the study of the energetic, digestive, reproductive, blood and informative networks of the human organism and its balances with the cellular scale.

-It followed that in the i+1 scale there were also such 3 networks, the political informative system, the economic, reproductive system and the energetic geography of Gaia. And we could also establish a ‘medical discipline’ for history, as the laws of all systems were the same. So in the same manner we could cure the sickness of a cellular organism, we could solve and cure human social systems, in which we all humans were citizen cells.  And so I designed a perfect world. One in which all human beings would have as cells do in a body enough energy and information to survive and thrive.

Biology: Evolution.

Back to biology, and its higher scale, the i+1 social scale, I realized species were also super organisms in which each individual was a cell. Since I could define an impersonal plan of evolution, where species also followed the 3 evolutionary ages or ‘dimensions of time’,  from a young predator state, through a biological radiation that reproduces the species, into an informative ‘tall’ age of maximal perception. So life went from the flat worm to the tall man, and reptiles from the flat amphibia to the dinosaur and bird:

55-PLAN-EVOLUTION-1024x728

In the graph, a fundamental ‘question’ resolved by complex science is the unification of all the ‘scales’ of the Universe, according to the laws of ‘morphology’ in space and ‘causality’ of time, which defines a fundamental ‘ternary’ symmetry, between the ‘ages’ of time of a system, its ‘forms’ in space, and its ‘scales’ of social organization, from where we can deduce the ‘evolution’ in time and space of any ‘cellular’ i-1, individual or social-species, i+1 scale of organization:

The formalism of 3×3+1 Dimensional systems of scalar space-time, relates  all those dimensions to the ‘synoptic’ concepts of energy, information and its reproductive combinations.

As all systems of Nature will be composed of 3 ‘morphological elements’, which correspond to the ‘3 topologies’ of 2-manifolds:

– E: lineal energy limbs/fields, maximal in the ‘1st young age of a system’

– I: cyclical, informative, gauging heads-particles, maximal in the 3rd old, informative age of the system.

– ExI: reproductive, combined waves-bodies, which balance both into a steady state, of maximal efficiency, proper of the adult, immortal age of a system.

Thus all systems of reality are made of 3 ‘physiological networks’, with those 3 elements, which in physical systems are E-fields/exi waves/i-particles, and in biological systems, are limbs/bodies/heads.

And in sociological systems are ‘energetic environment/reproductive middle, working classes and informative, linguistic, ‘upper classes’.

And so there is an ‘arrow of evolutionary time or life cycle’ which constantly increases the ‘information’ of a system through those 3 ages.

In the graph we can see that arrow of evolution in life species.

Thus the ‘3 dimensions of time’ (youth, adult and 3rd age), take place across 3 scales of complexity (cellular, individual and social scale), in symmetry with the 3 ‘dimensions of space’ (length, height and width), proper of the 3 ‘organic elements’ of any system according to a simple symmetry:

– Lineal length(Sx)=Maximal motion (youth)=i-1 scale (small, cellular) = ENERGY symmetry of fields/limbs/planar territories over the Earth.

– Height (Sy) = Maximal Perception (3rd age)=i+1 (social, bigger) = Information symmetry, proper of particles/heads/upper informative castes in control of the financial/legal languages of society.

– Width (Sz) =  Maximal Balance (Adult Age) = i = Reproductive Age= Energy x Information, proper of waves/bodies/middle re=productive classes, which are the ‘most efficient’, steady state systems that must control the other 2 for the perfect design of any Universal system.

So I could create a synoptic analysis of all systems and its dimensions, as all physical and biological systems lived in space-time through its  3 ‘ages or states’, of Energy -> Exi-Reproduction -> Information, will have 3 components, and will follow the general laws of ‘physiology’ that organizes a perfect organism in which the body dominates the system (the wave action in physics, the middle class in a well-organized society, in which the ‘informative, neuronal castes of politicians and economists’ serve the people, and Nature is exploited for the resources of a welfare state where all humans receive energy and information toe survive,as all cells of a working organism does).

How accurate are those laws of Nature and the ‘ternary’ processes of evolution in time and organization in space of any system, can be observed if we analyze the specific ‘differentiation’ of the human being in gender, physiology, social classes, and ‘evolutionary species.

Anthropology: ternary differentiation

– And so this discovery applied to anthropology solved also the evolution of the human kind, also with 3 morphologies and ages – the visual, lineal neanderthal, the small, informative pygmy and its combinations, the 3 races of mankind:

56-gender-848x10231

In the graphs, one of the most fascinating results of Complexity analysis is the solution of the ‘Plan of Evolution’ based in the ‘limited’ topology of the Universe. Indeed, in a ”2-manifold”, pedantic expression that merely means a bidimensional surface, there are only 3 possible forms, which correspond to the morphologies of energy, information and its balanced combinations. So species evolve in those 3 eternal variations of the same theme, from lineal, energetic men to informative women and the intermediate sex, to the 3 human races, to the 3 ‘topologic varieties’ of evolution, to the 3 ages of life, function and form always rhyme. In the first picture we see the 3 ‘ages’ of evolution of most species. Below the differentiation of human species, into energetic, reproductive and informative ones.

Specifically the ‘evolution’ of the ape into the human being, shows the fundamental procedure of nature in the process of ‘differentiation’ of species along the 3 ‘fundamental’ possible avenues of a ternary organism: improvements in energy system, information systems and its balanced reproductive networks. Thus the original ape species can be differentiated into ‘energetic’ stronger animals (gorilla), informative ‘australopithecus’, and balanced, reproductive ‘bonobo chimpanzees’, our closest species, dedicated all day to ‘fuk’ (-; 

Now contrary to belief, the ‘energetic’ species is the one normally extinguished, as the arrow of evolution primes the informative species, but FOR A SYSTEM TO REMAINS IMMORTAL, the desired strategy is neither evolve in information or energy, but maintain the steady state by reproducing constantly an equal system. This wisdom found in history only among Chinese Taoist masters (the closest culture to the laws of the yin-information yang-energy universe), which repeated its cycles of history dynasty after dynasty, and have become the most successful tribal species of cultural mankind, however is hardly attained in the Universe except in very wise systems (spiral galaxies, immortal cellular systems, taoist philosophers,  etc.). Yet the knowledge of the physiological causes of death – the exhaustion of energy by selfish informative neurons/upper classes – is essential to control and maintain a system in the point of immortality. In any case, humans did evolve informatively and rejected the balanced and energetic states of evolution.

And so in the graph we can see how in III Horizons of increasing information, equivalent through the 3 ages of life (500 cc australopithecus, 1000 cc homo erectus, 1500 cc homo sapiens) mankind arrived to the final racial differentiation, in which the dominant informative verbal homo decoupled into:

– White, energetic, visual race/cultures (with higher mixture with Neanderthals in Europe).

– Reproductive balanced culture (black people, mixture of all other races after the ‘circumvolution’ of the old continents by the original verbal Homo – mithocondrial pigmy woman)

– Informative, mongoloid culture (mutated in the higher tibetan-altai steppe).

So surprisingly enough the so-called ‘superior white race’ to which this writer unfortunately belongs (-; should not have won the battle of history. If it does so is because it has allied itself despite their shortcoming in social organization with energetic metal-weapns, starting the evolution of ‘the other species’, which will extinguish us, the weapon or top predator machine whose function is to kill man.

The evolution of man: Ternary differentiations.

Complexity defines a Ternary game of evolution by differentiating species in informative and energetic species, combined in balanced organisms. The same game evolved man from the original ape 5 million ago into the human being. Moreover the differentiation is established first from an initial top, predatory, young energetic species (the gorilla in the human case), that diverts into a reproductive, mature species (the chimp bonobo) and finally in its 3rd informative age gives birth to a more mental species (the Australopithecus). This thesis of multiple spaces-times first established in the foundational book of this science 20 years ago, was confirmed with the discovery of the exact genetic clock: the divergence between gorillas and chimpanzees is 1.17, then the genetic clock diverges 1.17 to create man… Thus the same plan of evolution, which we used to describe all other biological species of the Universe created man from Mr. Ape.

Moreover, the Universe has 3±i arrows/dimensions of creation, energetic length, informative height and balanced=symmetric, bilateral reproductive width. This simple dimensional game happens even in man. Yet bilateral systems often are also dual: one side is slightly Entropy dominant and the other slightly informative, offering a more complex, kaleidoscopic higher truth (multiple p.o.v.s). It is also a sexual principle: Women are information-dominant; males are Entropy dominant. And it should find wider applications to understand the dualities of the brain.

Such topological analysis confirms our informative nature:

In human evolution the ternary principle applies beyond the triad of apes: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex=informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher Entropy x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energetic top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they learned to control complex motion in the dimension of informative height, adding a 3rd spatial dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species.

In the graph we study the ternary process responsible for the creation of humanity:  Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between Entropy and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±i horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.

And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in Entropy (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, Entropy and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.

Thus from an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:

—  Max. E: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.

—   E=O: The chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the Pan Paniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes. It is:

—   Max.O: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:

I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.

We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favors his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago are:

—  Max. E: The Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is the Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.

—  E=O. The Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa as a contemporary of the Paranthropus.

—  Max.O: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is the form, which holds more information in lesser space.

Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative Homos. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favored their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:

—  Max. E: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.

—  E=O: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.

—  Max.O. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.

II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens.

That Homo Ergaster, after a massive age of reproduction and expansion throughout the planet, subdivides again in 3 sub-races of Homo Erectus.

—  Max.E: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.

—  E=O: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.

—  Max.O: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black Hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered3, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.

Paleontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (allopatric evolution). Thus, he adds now technological Entropy weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new Entropy/information duality:

The energetic, big Neanderthal and the informative Bushman, which combine again to give birth to multiple races.

Those predictions based in the ternary principle and the Black Hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) have been confirmed by genetic maps and Paleontology and await final confirmation when new skulls of Floresiensis are found.

The 3rd, informative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.

image057

— The lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.

— A second informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman, the mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.

± 80.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).

± 40.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the Capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced E=O, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.

Cultural races

3AXIS

Further on, as racial tribes evolved socially and emerged into cultural societies, which are super-organisms of history, the ternary, racial division of mankind between energetic white men, informative Mongoloid and vitalist blacks, will become the cultural differentiation of human beings in 3 type of brain orientations, and hence cultures of the mind according to the 3 elements of all systems, Entropy, information and its reproductive combination; reflected in 3 types of brain morphology:

— ‘Visual, energetic, lineal, spatial cultures’, proper of the white man, with his concepts of lineal time and his passion for technological, energetic weapons and individual, selfish behavior. It is the dolichocephalic brain dominated by the visual eye to Occipital axis, also dominant in the Homo Neanderthal.

—    ‘Cyclical, informative, mongoloid cultures’, natural to Asian civilizations, with cyclical concepts of time. It is the brachycephalic, wide, verbal brain; dominant in the ear axis; hence giving birth to female, eusocial cultures like the Chinese.

—    And ‘sensory, reproductive, colored cultures’, which in Africa and India developed human senses to their limits. It is dominant in the height/medullar axis with a ‘tall head’, peaking in the top/motor and sensorial area.

The culture/age better for the survival of mankind, as in all species, is the one that balances both arrows, E=O. Thus we should promote paradoxically the culture that a technological civilization discriminates: the black, reproductive, sensory culture.

Let us study them in more detail how the ternary differentiation that created humans being from apes explains racial differentiation by establishing 3 types of minds:

The 3 types of minds: Emotional, visual and verbal brains.

The existence of 3 dominant human races today, the white, yellow and black people, cannot be argued, but they must be interpreted as 3 types of complementary intelligence, based in our recent discoveries on the science of Complexity, which always favors a ternary process of creation, with an energetic, informative and reproductive ‘decoupling’ along the 3 morphological dimensions or ”axis’ of any space-time form. In the case of the brain, there are 3 axes, the long visual axis, the tall emotional axis and the wide, verbal axis, and so we talk of 3 mental races:

–  The dolichocephalic brain, which overdeveloped visual axis, from the eye to the occipital bone. It is the white man.

– The brachiocephalic brain with an overdeveloped verbal axis from ear to ear. It is the mongoloid race.

– The makrocephalic brain11, with an overdeveloped emotional axis, from neck to top of the head. It is the black race.

They maximize the 3 types of human minds: energetic races (white, visual, spatial, egocentric); informative races (yellow, verbal, temporal, eusocial), and reproductive races (black, emotional, inwards, ethocentric):

– Max. E: Visual, spatial, energetic minds.

image060

In the symmetry of time and space, is the case of the first age or ‘’child and the ‘male’ species of the white races and in the earlier anthropological record, it is the Neanderthal, which we already considered 20 years ago as Cohn did, to be co-father of the white man born as Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, which recently the genetic record has proved:

White people, who occupy the same range than Neanderthals are easily recognized by their dolichocephalic head and occipital bulk, their eye=I oriented mind, individualistic ego and energetic behavior. Their languages are consonantal, with few vowels. They have red hair and Rh- (a sign of crossing between different species, whose 2nd generation is not fertile, as mules born from asses and horses are). Further Neanderthal traits – white skin, hooked nose, wide hips – also recognizable in the Basque, Iberian, Germanic, Celtic and Semitic cultures, paradigms of visual cultures, which will make of shiny metal, weapons and go(l)d, their fetish – seem to validate further this thesis. In economics, it gives birth to the gold fevers of those cultures, origin of ‘greed’, an emotional, visual trait which other types of human minds (Chinese) hardly suffered:

Thus the white man should be properly called Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis, dominant in visual information with minimal development on the parietal regions of speech. He will thus evolve the visual language in its 10th ‘Brodmann’ region of rational thought further into digital, geometric and mathematical thought, and create lineal civilizations based in metal, lineal time and Aristotelian thought. He can be sub-divided in two types, which again recent experimental proofs seem to validate:

-The Semite, in which Neanderthal males mixed with verbal women, but Neanderthal females did not cross with dwarf verbal men, creating a mixed race with an extreme sexual dimorphism (taller male, smaller women). A similar case will happen in South-America where conquistadors mixed with Amerindian females but Amerindians did not cross with Spanish women, since the dominant warrior, stronger species, in the first crossing of the Homo Sapiens, in 80.000 BC was the Neanderthal and in the first crossing of the Atlantic the Spaniard.

This theory advanced in my earlier books C,1 has now proofs in the genetic record. The result is the Semite with a dominant bigger, highly aggressive, visual male and a smaller emotional woman. The reason of this military superiority is the fact that at that time the Homo Sapiens had not developed the arch and so it was dominated by the Neanderthal, stronger javelin warrior. Then in the Altai mountains, homo sapiens evolved into the mongoloid Cro-Magnon which invented the arc and hence could kill at distance the Neanderthal. This man went down to Europe and the mixing process was reversed:

Now Homo Sapiens mixed with stronger Neanderthal women (more pure among Nordic and Scottish Women with red and blonde hair, dolichocephalic, visually oriented, often sexually dominant). Thus the Indo-European race was born. This last detail of Complex theory of human evolution should wait for further genetic analysis since so far we have only observed that with a 90% of equality between men and Neanderthals and a 4% of Neanderthal genes there is mixing both in Semitic, white and Cro-Magnon (northern Chinese) groups.

-Max.O: Verbal, temporal, informative minds.

Ulan Batar July 2006 011

This is the case in time symmetry of old people; in the symmetry of gender latter studied in more detail of the ‘female’ species and in the symmetry of race of the yellow race; and in the earlier racial record, of the parental capoid, Homo Sapiens Sapiens. All of them are head-dominant, with clear neoteny features (thus with lesser young, energetic development), smaller in spatial body, with a dominant brachycephalic brain, and wider face, as the main linguistic part of the brain, the Brocca region, goes across from ear to ear. Thus, the mongoloid race and the female gender are dominant in the verbal, wide axis. Hence the distance between the eyes and the parietal is larger and their eyes are wider.

As all informative species the mongoloid is highly social, group oriented, selfless, as it uses the verbal language to create their super-organisms of history. Their language has an excess of informative vowels over energetic consonants; women play a greater role even in Semitic culture (Indonesian Muslims). They are less violent, highly intelligent (Chinese test 10 points more than white men), and have shown as all species that can evolve socially the highest record of survival compared to the original Semitic cultures, which base their societies in the power of metal greed and murder, gold slavery and iron weapons.

-ExO: Reproductive, emotional, body oriented cultures.

image064

A 3rd type of culture, whose minds are dominated by emotional sensorial, body oriented, reproductive drives, is the black culture and the adolescent. Its brain is taller, with the top point in the upper head, as the dominant direction comes from the spinal-hypothalamus axis upwards. Thus, the brain regions most developed in emotional races happen along the ‘height’ axis. They are the inner regions of emotional thought (limbic system) and the motor and sensorial cortex on top. This hypothesis, extracted from our models of complexity and duality developed in the 90s have now increasing evidence: women are found to be wired inwards with more connections going towards the Hypothalamus than men, wired outwards towards the visual regions. And certainly both, black and female ‘races/genres’ show higher development of the emotional brain and excel in tasks related to the body/senses.

Psychological characters

Those findings are applied also to the will and drives of the mind: – Max.O: There are people who psychologists define as picnic, nervous, tall (height is the dimension of information).

– Max.E: There are athletic, sanguineous people, dominated by their energetic will.

-E=O: There are viscerotonic people, driven by their ‘lower passions’ (-;

Those distinctions already observed in XIX C. studies on brain morphology and cultural psychology are real, increasingly proved by a wide number of research papers that go from the analysis of why men draw better maps and women talk more to genetic studies in linguistics and bio-chemistry that validate our 20 year old research in those fields. Racism consists in thinking that a visual brain is better than an emotional brain or a verbal brain.

A key question in a biological world is the choice of which of those cultures, personalities and genders should be the referent for the rest of mankind, in order to maximize the goals of all super-organisms and species – survival. And the surprising yet evident truth of an organic model of the Universe is that the Makrocephalic, ethnocentric and verbal, brachycephalic feminine gender should dominate with its balance and ethic sense of survival the violent, visual, technological civilization of the white man, whose ‘energetic’ impulses are taking this planet out of balance, destroying Nature and building the new forms of ‘metalife’ (weapons, robots, A.I.) and machines of the singularity that will extinguish us. Yet this is not obvious because the 3rd paradigm of measure has no organic whys, despises life and ‘sees’ only reality with machines, it does not feel it or understand the deepest game of existence we have explained here. So we are walking steadily towards the extinction of history , the 10th and last extinction of life on Earth, guided by the visual wanting of the Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, its lineal, energetic weapons and hypnotic go(l)d, themes those we will treat in depth in the last lessons.

White matter/Grey matter brain: ternary analysis.

image067

Let us consider the brain under the ternary principle in its topology, ages and fractal st-planes12.

Topological analysis

In the graph, the 3 brains of the human being from a spatial, topological perspective:

– Max.O: Our external, sensorial grey matter.

-Max. E: our internal, emotional, limbic system.

– E=O: Combined in a white matter, memorial, reproductive brain.

We perceive with our senses; whose perceptions are processed by the DNA rich, cyclical, fluctuating, integrating cells of the grey matter brain, and then the outcome becomes imprinted in resistant white matter networks made of axon-connections. This external program mixes with an internal program coming from the body, which defines our wanting for Entropy and reproduction (sexuality), the main arrows of time of the body and limbs; whose wanting are processed by the limbic brain.

Then both programs converge into the axons. Both programs, the one of the body and the one of the brain, thus, mix and create together the white matter brain of beliefs that define our actions, memories and behavior in a greater measure, which in women are more wired to the limbic brain and in men to the grey matter and eye senses. Because women have more axons wired to the limbic system, they live more for themselves, inward-looking, emotionally-driven. Because men have more axons connected to the grey matter brain and their external, visual senses, they are more connected to space, mathematical-technological objects and motions within external space.

Temporal analysis

image065

A key element to understand memetic imprinting is the inflexibility of the brain beyond 40 years. This was understood by the Greeks which divided life in two ages, till 40 (acne) when the brain peaks in informative power, which was considered the summit of life and then all was downwards till our end at the end of the mean generational cycle of ±80 years.

Thus the 3 layers of the brain are imprinted only in the ‘1st part of existence’, before the curve of life goes down in the 3rd age, since we only learn in that first part of existence. And this makes most people during the time in which they exercise social power, inflexible, memetic programs that will never learn but merely exercise their emotional imprintings converted in beliefs; disconnected from the ever evolving FMI complex, whose challenges they will be unable to resolve.

In that regard, within that ½ fraction of existence, in the child age the limbic system dominates; in the adolescence and earlier, mature age the grey matter brain learns, reasons and imprints the white matter brain, which will dominate the adult age in which we live according to beliefs, which are more difficult to change as the variability of the white matter brain is restricted once those connections are fixed. As that period of life roughly extends from 30 to 80 years old, this means most humans are neither rational, nor emotional but basically ‘programs’ with a ‘motherboard’ of fixed beliefs and chains of rational thoughts, which make us perform the same routine actions the rest of our lives – not very different from the fixed forms of any computer system.

Fractal analysis

image069

In the previous graph, left center the fractal analysis connects Multiple space-times theory with the Freudian psychology as the 3 regions of the brain can be considered 3 hierarchical layers, with a grey matter brain that senses reality and delivers information to the subconscious, limbic, survival brain that acts restricting the information that becomes imprinted in the long memory of the white matter brain.

Freud rightly understood the ‘limits’ of rational thought, due to the subconscious, powerful Super-ego, the memetic super-structures that society establishes to control and repress the biological, natural genetic program of life and love.

In Complexity, the brain is a fractal system of 3 ‘sub-brains’, the subconscious, energetic, limbic system, of ‘short memory’, survival instincts and basic actions, the, white matter, the ‘fixed circuit’ of beliefs, imprinted in childhood by biological desires, the drives codes by genes and in youth by cultural memes, the drives of the super-organisms of history; and finally the grey matter, the rational, thinking, variable brain connected to the truth of external senses.

The most common trajectory of thought through those layers is during the young, emotional age:

External world->Senses->grey matter brain->Limbic censorship->Ompression in the white matter brain->Actions

While as the organism matures, the limbic system loses importance and the grey matter brain connects to the white matter brain directly:

Outer World->Senses->grey matter brain-> white matter Printing->actions

On the other hand, people dominant in emotions and inward thought might have the exactly opposite way of thought:

Inner world of biological drives ->Limbic System->White matter imprinting >actions

Obviously our previous analysis of ages, races and genders and the socio-cultural upbringing will make those 3 avenues of thought differ in individuals. And in fact as impolite as it might seem, we find that most systems follow the irrational drives of biological existence, expressed by the limbic system and imprinted as desires in the white matter brain, which determines most human actions.

What this means is that most humans have the ‘center of consciousness’ NOT in reason but in the imprinted beliefs of the white matter brain, connected to its survival instinctive limbic brain – that ‘rejects’ beyond its short memory any attempt to imprint further the white matter brain.

Thus the most common program is Biological censorship by the centers of happiness that suppress painful information and upholds the imprinting of childhood and adolescence and its emotional truths as absolute, both in biological taste and cultural religions and beliefs.

Or in other words, once an idea is fixed in youth, to redraw it you would have to break and kill the programs of the mind; which if we consider the cellular scale of imprinting, turns out to be almost impossible as the acetylcholine that redraws the white matter axons is no longer available in enough quantities.

So the ideas imprinted in youth, once the white matter circuit is put in place (and no longer can be rewired after adolescence), won’t change. The person will forget or become aggressive with its limbic, censoring brain against reason and evidence. And since the limbic brain is ego-driven and subjective, we must embrace a difficult fact to assume: 99% of humans are dominated by the white matter brain of earlier socio-biological beliefs. .

Recap. In complexity evolution is guided by the existence of only 3 types of morphologies and networks in living beings: the morphology and nervous system of information, the morphology of Entropy, and the morphology and network of reproduction. We can therefore use, as we have done in studies of evolution of all type of species, the existence of a constant speciation in 3 different species to analyze as we do in the previous graph, the evolution of mankind from the initial triad of apes, the energetic gorilla, the reproductive chimp and the informative Australopithecus, till the last differentiation of homos, between the energetic, visual Neanderthal mind, today dominant in the white man, and the smaller, informative, verbal, homo sapiens, today dominant in the informative mongoloid, with the reproductive, emotional black race in the middle.

Thus, the Isomorphisms of Evolution and its 3±i ages and subspecies, map out the main species of Homo, till arriving to 2 Homo Sapiens, the spatial, visual=longer, dolichocephalic, energetic brain of the Neanderthal, which seems to have lived in Europe and left some of his traits in the Homo Palestiniensis, on the slow-crossing border of Canaan. Further cross-breeding of the Palestiniensis with Sapiens is the likely origin of the white man (white skin, red hair, Rh-? consonantal languages, wide hips, prominent nose).

While the informative Homo Sapiens Sapiens, the verbal=wider brachycephalic brain, which started as a small ‘San pygmy’, evolved into the self-similar mongoloid race. Finally, the black race, with tall brains is the sensorial culture, the reproductive species, the last one to appear, shows the maximal genetic mixture.

The brain studied topologically is a system of 3 regions, the energetic, emotional, body oriented limbic system; the external, informative, sensorial grey matter brain, and the white matter axons that connect both and controls our beliefs firing our actions.

WO=MEN: GENDER AND BRAIN STRUCTURE.

image071

As many other biological species, human life diversified into complementary genders: energetic, lineal, spatial men and cyclical, reproductive women, which hold more biological information. While a 3rd, gay sex mixes both.

Gender: complementary differentiation.

In the graph, the biology, psychology and gender culture prove that humans are a dual species, divided into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3rd, gay sex’, who mixes both, being women the informative species that reproduces the fractal information of the human being and man the lineal energetic species. Thus, biological origins, psychological behaviour and cultural forms explain gender as a ternary differentiation of humans into informative females, energetic males and a ‘3rd sex‘ of gay groups that mix both tendencies. Let us consider this essential duality of the human species in more detail.

The classic example of space/time Duality already observed by Taoist and Buddhist philosophers is the duality of gender, which they correctly applied to all species of the Universe. If we focus on the humankind, which is also a space-time species, its fundamental space/time duality is between its 2 genders: the energetic male and the informative female.

Humans have always wondered what gender is. Thanks to duality, following in the steps of Eastern philosophy, now we can build a scientific theory of gender able to explain its 2 fundamental elements, the scientific physiology and the behaviour of both sexes:

Since the Universe is made with 2 elements, Energetic Space and Temporal Information, any species needs to survive to feed on Entropy and remember Information. Yet, we know that males process and control better Entropy and space; while females have more temporal memory and perceive better. Thus, together a couple widens the range of Entropy and Information they can process. So we conclude that gender is an evolutionary strategy of specialization, which increases the overall chances of survival of a heterosexual species.

The physiological forms, character and historic behaviour of men and women prove such duality, parallel to the universal duality of Entropy and information: men love Entropy, space; women love Time. Physiologically men are made of lines, as Entropy is; while women are made of curves, as information is. Historically men performed the hunting of energetic preys, while the recollection of cyclical food (agriculture) is traditionally considered a female discovery.

Men behave as Entropy species. Their body forms are lineal shapes of muscular strength; they have lineal reproductive organs (penis); their origin is lineal sperm. Their cultural roles are specialized in spatial-Entropy processes, from physical activities to war and mathematical, geometrical languages in which they excel.

On the other hand, women are specialized in temporal processes. Their bodies have cyclical shapes and store more information to succeed in their genetic reproduction (one complete X-chromosome). Their brains specialize in verbal languages and show outstanding memory. If we observe the form of females, it is made of cycles. Their higher genetic information allows them the creation and reproduction of the human species (an informative process); their cyclical reproductive organs (vulva, clitoris) and their origin as a sphere, an ovule, are also informative topologies.

The character and life attitudes of both, men and women follow that E/I specialization also in their relative wanting for Entropy or information: women prefer to dress with cyclical forms, play with formal toys like dolls and they like formal sports like gymnastics; men prefer moving, spatial toys, lineal dresses and violent sports. Thus, men love Entropy and movement while women love perception and feelings. In the realm of the mind and its languages of perception we find that men test better in spatial mathematics and women score higher in verbal tests.

We conclude that sexual dimorphism reflects the 2 elements of reality, spatial Entropy and temporal information that merge together in a couple, improving its chances of survival:

Male: Max.E x Min.O; Gay: E=O; Female: Max. O x Min.E

In the last decade the analysis of female/male brains has confirmed such duality of gender at multiple levels. For example, among women the amygdale, the oldest, primary center of will in the brain, is connected to the Hypothalamus, the center of ‘temporal’ and emotional perception, which ultimately controls survival and reproductive behavior. While men have their amygdale wired mainly to the motor and spatial regions of the encephalon. Thus men are the energetic ‘external element’ of the couple, motivated by the spatial outer world and women are the informative, temporal, implosive element, motivated by the reproductive drive of survival and the inner emotions of the body, the ‘6th sense’.

As the reader will have notice, truth becomes more sophisticated as we perceive in more detail. Monism is the first scale of knowledge that observes only the body/brain; and yet it has sufficed to build our society of lineal, energetic ‘visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis (white man). Then duality observes the differences in the body of lineal male and cyclical women, but we need to go further and analyse sexuality with the ternary principle that adds the 3rd sex, and consider the different combinations and balances of body/brains that will give us different ‘personalities’ and ultimately a more accurate analysis of what we do not see but dominates all structures – the informative brains.

And then the previous picture radically changes; since if women are reproductive bodies and men lineal, energetic bodies; when we observe the brain, to balance those bodies according to the Law of survival and balance of the Universe, Entropy-past x information-future = present-reproduction, if men have energetic bodies they must have informative brains to balance both in a present, and if women have reproductive bodies that repeat the information of life they must have reproductive brains that repeat also the information of the brain: present x present = present.

And indeed such is the case.

Thus in a more complex view, as all beings are themselves yin-yang, space-time beings, we could define men as yang/yin: bodies ruled by the external, spatial activities; and creative brains of information dominant in grey matter (6 times more than women); and define women as yinyang/yanying; reproductive bodies whose emotions rule the brain; and reproductive brains, dominant in white matter (10 times more than men).

But what matters of those Universal balances is the fact that ultimately male and female genders are complementary forms, with the same value, a fact easy to prove using the formalism of Duality:

Male: exe-body +OxO-Brain <=> Female: brain (o x E) + Body (exI)

Thus we define a male, as a form whose ‘Entropy body’ is dominant in energetic, lineal forms (ExE), while its brain is focused in informative, visual creative tasks (Max.O), resulting in a species unconnected with his body with an external, outward focus. The Female gender however has her informative brain focused in reproductive, memorial tasks and wired internally towards the reproductive body (OXE); while her reproductive body is dominant in cyclical, informative forms (ExO).

Thus while the total amount of Entropy and information or ‘existential force’ of both genders is the same, the distribution and combination of those parameters differ, making women, highly balanced, focused into the self-reproduction of their own space-time field, and the male gender, unstable, focused in the external world. Those theses, as politically incorrect as they might be are the i-logic deductions of Multiple Space-time Theory, recently proved right by the analysis of the brain.

Recap. Species evolve in a dual, complementary Universe of systems of Entropy and information, increasing their energetic/body power, their informative/head power or the networks that reproduce and combine both systems, exo, the reproductive networks. We talk of 3 dominant wills or biological drives that increase the survival chances of a system. For that reason there are genders (where the male is the energetic species, and the female the reproductive, informative one). And since Entropy is lineal (being the line the fastest distance between two points) and information is cyclical (being the sphere the form that stores more information in lesser space), it follows that men have big, lineal, spatial bodies and test better in geometrical analysis and women have cyclical, smaller, rounded forms and test better in verbal, informative tasks. Yet there is always a 3rd, mixed variation, in the case of gender, the gay sex.

Complex analysis of the duality of gender.

We can now with all this knowledge reconsider the differences between men and women (and by extension, white races and cultures vs. emotional-informative black and mongoloid races and cultures, self-similar to women), and which cultures should dominate mankind to make us survive longer. Since gender traits transmit to psychology, physiology, mental attitudes and customs. Let us consider a few examples from the different perspective of multiple space-time theory, the algebraic, topological, temporal and fractal, scalar analysis.

Algebraic analysis: combinations of genders.

The Universe offers more variations even if it selects finally 3 dominant ones. Thus, since we depart from only 2 species, Entropy and information, which combine ad infinitum, we can do several degrees of depth in our analysis. A dualist analysis makes men energetic and women informative, perceptive.

Then a ternary differentiation gives us:

Max. E (Male), E=O (neutral gender), Max.O (Female).

A more complex analysis however must combine variations of 2 elements, the body and the brain. So this 2nd differentiation will combine 2 elements, the informative brain which can be body-reproductive/energetically oriented or brain-informatively oriented; and the body, which can be body-reproductive/ energetically oriented. Finally the most complex analysis will consider ternary combinations of 3 elements (Entropy, active limbs; reproductive body and informative brain).

Let us consider the simplified 2×2 analysis, assuming that the body is oriented towards Entropy in males and reproduction in females. And consider both cases as an ‘Energetic-reproductive event’. So we obtain 4 basic combinations of form and character:

-ExO + OXE: Females, whose commutation gives us a new species: – OXE + ExO: Gay genders in which an energetic body (male gay) is oriented towards its inner, informative emotions as women are or a reproductive, informative body is oriented towards external, energetic sensations as lesbians are. Thus gays are males focused in their inward feelings and female focused in the outward world.

Finally we have two male combinations:

– ExE and OxO: Men whose brain is oriented to energetic tasks, and live dominated by their bodies (warriors, sportsmen, white males) and men whose brain is oriented to informative tasks, separated from their body (scientists, mongoloid races).

Those 2 dualities explain why according to statistics, most men are less perceptive than women, but a few specialized Max.O x O are geniuses. Hence the form of the Bell curve of the previous graph40, which shows two tails of minimal and maximal intelligence in men between the mean of women balanced between Entropy and information.

Finally the 3rd gay gender that combines both, the properties of males and females, is also a ‘species’ natural to the isomorphisms of the Universe, albeit a minority, compared to the 2 dominant subspecies. Since in the Universe we observe always, beyond its simplest duality, a 3rd, ExO, more complex element that combines the properties of both, to perform better as part of the collective organism. And indeed, the gay gender has traditionally acted as a bridge between the other 2 genders – both in tribal societies where they played often the role of the medicine man or witch and in modern societies as ‘the best friend’ of many wo=men.

Topological analysis

If we draw a line it suggests a male, yang, energetic, mobile species. If we draw a cycle it represents an informative cyclical still, female species. And children and simplified signs do so to represent them.

Women are cyclical and men are lineal in body and brain morphology:

Men have brains 15 to 20% spatially bigger than women’s brains and are better fit for spatial tasks.

Women’s brain contain about 10% more neurons in key zones that gather temporal information, behind the eyes, in the zones that recognize verbal and musical structures the languages of time, and is denser in neuronal connections, making up for lack of size.

Women are more likely than men to recover speech after a stroke.

Men have a bigger right hemisphere, used to understand 3D objects in space.

The left hemisphere, which controls speech, is bigger in women.

Men connect outwards with the motor zone best wired.

Women connect inwards with the hypothalamus and amygdale best wired (sixth sense).

So topological biology is conclusive: men are specialized in spatial Entropy, women in temporal information.

Time=Information/Space=Entropy: Female/male related variables

image073

In the graph, men murder 10 times more than women.

A few other self-evident characteristics of gender duality reinforce the thesis of Multiple Space-times Theory:

– Females live longer as time and information are related; males are stronger energetically but live less.

– Female are cyclical, male are lineal.

– Female remember, are memorial, temporal, conservative of the past order. Male forget and look towards the ‘uncertain’ future.

-Woman is the informative form; hence her nervous system dominates. Males are the energetic form and hence their blood system dominates.

– Behavior and tastes: women like forms, men movement:

Woman love time men love space. Woman love information men love Entropy. Men love movement, energetic, violent sports, races, military games and toys. Women love formal dolls that can be dressed. Women love formal sports: gymnastics. Male dresses are lineal; women’s clothing is curved, cyclical.

– Male love open spaces; women stand better seclusion.

– Men do a single task better; women do many tasks in a cyclical pattern.

– Men drive spatially better through lineal roads.

– Women cook, trans-form food, men hunt for it.

– Entropy violence, death and destruction as the graph shows, are clear male behaviors. The positive side of it is the fact that to create something new, you have to destroy first. Thus, women conserve more and they have been historically less creative.

– Implosive Vs. explosive nature: Outward Vs. inward nature:

Men have explosive, outward, visual behavior; women have implosive, emotional behavior.

Women stand pain/pressure/inwards behavior better. Women feel pain more intensely than men and yet they tolerate it more, since pain is a pressure, inward sensation of in/formative nature.

-But it is precisely the combination of both movements what creates the Sexual reproductive feeling of pleasure, since in the Universe balance dominates as the best strategy. And since women are informative & reproductive with a higher balance, they are sexually more complex.

Scalar, Fractal analysis.

 

– Further on, as women’s body are more complex, dominant, and their bodies attract men. Yet since men are mentally more creative, intelligent men attract more women. So a woman is still, as information is, waiting men to come as the energetic, active pole towards them, in the 3 scales of existence:

The lineal semen moves towards the cyclical ovule at cellular level; the male organism moves towards the female in the biological, mating season; and the male hunter brings food and today goes out to work while the female waits in the social scale.

St; st+1: Sociological scales.

Spatial Entropy and violence have a language; mathematics. In the graph, Women are ‘verbal/temporal brains’; men are mathematical, spatial, energetic brains: Women prefer social sciences, verbal sciences and humanities. Men dominate the fields of spatial sciences, sciences based on mathematics. On the other hand women test more in verbal exams. When a woman has died, on average she has spoken 20% more words than a man has done.

Psychology mostly shown in natural perception and literature has been the clearest wisdom on those natural traits and variations, even if today political correctness denies those variations. So the literary man can perfectly consider the master pieces of sentimental and psychological literature, when humans were free to study the reality of human existence without dogmas proper of the metric age or the industrial age, in which all humans are equalized as reproducers=workers of machines, and consumers =testers of them, and women’s nurturing and biological roles are eliminated, as they become equalized and simplified as ‘males’.

In that regard in Sociology and History, the higher scales of human existence duality of gender has been defined, according to the dominance of the higher ecosystem over the lower scales, by the ages, dominant castes and super-organisms of history studied in the last lectures of this work.

In brief, according to the 3 ages of history the dominance and power roles of women and men varied:

-In the Paleolithic, energetic age of History, the young age of male hunters, males dominated women.

-In the Neolithic, mature, reproductive age of history, of Fertility Goddesses and food-gathering, women dominated men. They found the cycles of reproduction of plants they better understood, and fed the community. They gave birth to the species. And they established religions of Fertility.

– In the age of metal, dominated by visual, lineal, energetic weapons and machines, men dominated women in its energetic, 1st age. Since energetic men are murderers, since the arrival of weapons males have controlled and abused the rights of women and fertile nature, waging war to both of them.

But the financial-military-industrial complex has 3 components as gender does. So we can in fact distinguish 2 types of cultures:

– Monetary-based cultures (Jewish, Chinese, Italian, British cultures), where women have a higher power, since money is a cyclical language of metal information

-Military, energetic, lineal, weapon based cultures, where men dominated (Arab, Japanese, Spanish, German cultures), as they associated historically with lineal iron weapons (the most energetic atom of the Universe).

And both are often in historic, open confrontation.

-Finally in the age of the machine, as we evolved first energetic machines (XIX c.) women kept submissive to men. But today in the Age of Information, dominated by audio-visual machines, and their language of reproduction, money, women, are increasingly becoming more powerful than men. Women indeed love money and information, which they understand better and makes them advance socially13.

Since indeed, the evolution of ‘information’ in this planet does not end in the human being, but continues with our offspring of machines, so we need to have now a wider view, that of the Earth as a planet to understand the 2 less developed sciences, those of history and economics that inscribe within the social evolution of this planet into a new st+1 plane as a global super-organism, the theme of the next lessons of this work.

Recap. Women are reproductive, balanced beings, whose brain is dominated by temporal, memorial tasks and wired towards its reproductive body. Men are unbalanced, creative/destructive species, with their brain wired towards visual, external information and the body focused in lineal, energetic tasks.

Women have indeed more mental Entropy and sensorial perception than men, as their brains seem to be wired towards the will of the body; while men are obsessed by the external world. Women tend to prefer closed spaces, which they keep well ordered, and are able to perform multiple ‘cyclical tasks’, switching on and off between them. They have peripheral, circular version. Men have lineal, focused vision. Men love open spaces, which they keep as Entropy is, in permanent disorder. And they are lineal, obsessed by single tasks.

 

The point in time and space of this blog and its author.

Structuralism rightly affirms writers are knots of thought of a culture and their life and names do no matter, as Taoism explained – the name that can be named is not the eternal name. And yet putting both concepts together, we writers-scientists are knots of thought of cultures, super organisms of species, which have hence a position and meaning in time and space. so we must place the fractal point of this mind and this blog in the time and space of mankind, at its point of maximal information, which paradoxically is also the point of death.

This will not be understood or accepted easily, as death in the 3rd age, splits the cells of the body into a huge majority, likely you if stumbling here by chance not directed with purpose, of chaotic, free happy cells who enjoy with the subtle justice of the Universe a sense of entitlement, liberated from the connections of its super organism, whose ethic nervous systems have collapsed. So you are likely just a ‘free, chaotic’ particle of the corpse of mankind thinking your ‘selfie’ infinitesimal point is ALL what matters. Fine, the dreams of madness, before death are a choice of the nothingness you are. but if you want to be within Matrix, NOT data – a pathetic final form of vegetative slavery, neither Neo, a role trust me, that cannot be played except by those who have constructed Matrix, the germs and yous of the goldiron culture that kill us, and will think in control till they are also done with, but ‘Trinity’ who received from Morpheus, the ‘language of God, the organic mind of the Universe’ or saint spirit, who speaks all languages (Upanishads) in the mystical poetry of Love religions, the eusocial biological 5D truth of mankind, you will find it here, not in the mechanisms that erase your mind, and make you a happy idiot, ready for slaughter-house 5.

Because Mechanism and its ‘idol-ogy’ capitalism, ultimately dedicated to the evolution and reproduction of the next ‘biological’ top predator species of this planet, the machine and weapon, now paradoxically entering its organic age as robots that displace humans from labor and war fields (cause of the present crisis of the eco(nomic)system) are ‘NOT science’ but cultural dogmas, and ‘those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’ (Einstein); i do not expect this blog to have many readers. Contrary to common wisdom ‘most people are slaves, they believe they don’t reason’ (Aristotle). And so they believe as good slaves in the abstract nature of those machines that are atrophying their minds and bodies and when awakened to consciousness will murder them; and as such you live in the final phase of human existence, called death, a the biological process of obsolescence and substitution of our species and languages of time (words-ethics-laws) and space (art) by sensorial machines, and its languages (mathematics).

So humans are entering a 3rd infantile old age of negative entropy, chaos and freedom – proper of all dead processes, which are a reversed state. Accordingly you live a revivalism of memorial  past, obsolete idol-ogies,  ‘prisons of the mind’ and unconnected ‘selfish attitudes’ that will make even more difficult for you to understand this blog – as you are likely an ego-trip, a lonely cell in a collective human corpse, the super organism of manind, hence a childish, egolatric, useless, primitive old-young mind, littered by beliefs in the ‘Homo Sapiens tribaliensis’ , either through nationalistic hymns, techno-utopian additions or abrahamic religions (which make of man, according to the two bro founders of the ‘People of the Treasure’, the culture of owners of the financial industry, then ‘habiru’ – those who walked behind the a$$es traders in slaves and metals – a member of the chosen species; that is, a short of selfish, ignorant child of thought, who ‘speaks’ an arcane language of God – no longer the word or Latin but ‘Axiomatic mathematics’, invented by a germ(anic) idealist, of the tribe who invented all the weapons of mass destruction of history, the germs of the super organism of mankind, Mr. Hilbert who said on the landmark of XX century mathematics, ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’. That is, he affirmed, as ego-centered donkey breeders before with words that now neither man or the word was the centre of the Universe, the machine and mathematics was. And both were born of the abstract mind of germs and yous, the animetal tribes that control history with the obsessive goal of killing it and substitute it by its fetish go(l)d and S(words), false idols of their mechanical beliefs. So chances you, a mental littered product of the goldiron civilisation now in its final catalysis, as robots made with chipped gold and iron bodies are being evolved to kill you, do your job and have the ‘laugh of the gods’ to your sense of truth and entitlement keep reading and understand any of this is very limited.

Both Abrahamic religions, mechanism and its attached lineal physics and financial economics, where kabbala digital languages are supposed to better reflects reality, as the product of the human ego-mind who therefore INVENTS the Universe are ‘delirium tremens’ of a species gone mad. The ego-trip of absolute happiness in a fantasy world, similar to those fantasies of Mr. Benigni, an old acquaintance of mine, to his son in the concentration camp where it surely would all die, victims and perpetrators, for its many sins as bankster and germs of the gold iron culture, is of course the caring last touch of the Universe, which is cruel by just, with those who invent truth with power.

We invent nothing here. This blog and its twin species – one dedicated to natural sciences, the other to social sciences, are the highest fractal POINT-world reached by the human mind in tune with the languages of God-the mind of the Universe, which re infinite (Upanishads). Something that if you can don’t ‘believe in the reasons of authority, but the authority of reason’ and have enough ethic courage to care nothing about your and the collective death of the species, certainly will enjoy. Why this point-world is here and now, is an irrelevant selfie. Let us just say that in the super organisms of mankind, our cultures, we are points of knot, born in a place of space and time, with a role for those who are ‘neurons’, maximal informative points of the super organism. My IQ, 180 dwindling with old age and anoxia, made me one. My culture during its 3 ages of life, moving west, in the European peninsulas was also the perfect balance between the semite language of words and the germanic language of maths. So it gave us the 3 highest peaks of human mental thought (art) and human logic thought (philosophy of science), in individuals or ternary disciples, in its Greek youth (Phidias, Plato->Aristotle); its classic maturity in Italy (Leonardo->Michelangelo, Galileo)  and 3rd , informative, baroque eclectic age in Spain (Picasso, Ll).

But as the even higher point-minds of the Eastern decoupling which co-exist in the symmetry of space, Lao-Biddha-Confucius put it ‘The name that can be named is not the eternal name, the function of existence (chang) in Time (Tao), which combines spatial, past energy (yang) and future, temporal information (yin), to reproduce in present the clone waves of 10³ relative infinite species of space-time beings, fractals of the Universe made to its image and likeness’.

So you can consider this fractal point with no name, the clearest mirror of the mind of mankind, in its point of death, when all the information of the super organism collapses achieved its maximal information, from wave into particle, just before becoming its own antiparticle of pure entropy and move back towards chaos, freedom and pleasure, the big-bang of self-death.

Its name matters not. But if you find it, just you know, he obviously walked is talk and defied Matrix, on the point of maximal death – the Nuclear Industry, and so after a spark of global fame, which shows it did hit in the right spot, he entered the long list of Snowells, Bradleys, Falcianis, etc. vaporised in Orwellian fashion by the industry of misinformation.

THE END OF THE AGE OF GODDESSES. WHY WOMEN ARE OPRESSED

But the original dominant species of the verbal black homo coming out of Africa and the Mongoloid Cro-magnon, coming out of Asia, the age of the verbal Goddesses and ‘Sumerian priests’, the ‘Taoist age’ of understanding of the yin yang forces of y-information and energy perceived by those earlier scientists of life, disappeared, and the schmidts and smiths, the metal masters’ of the west triumphed.

Why? This change that started with Genesis, with the tree of metal of technology, had an obvious cause: the discovery of ‘energetic weapons’ by white races that became ‘animetal cultures’ and imposed with the hypnotism of gold, the most perfect informative atom of the Universe and bronze and iron the most perfect energetic atom, its power to the rest of mankind, breaking the harmonic evolution of our social organism, history.

And so the anti-quantum paradox that confronted ‘selfish metal masters’  regressing to the i-scale of individual egos, and ‘priests of social love’ still trying to evolve mankind into an i+1 social organism started of Earnest. Our modern world is just the final phase of this ‘3rd age of human history’, where humans devolve for metal to evolve, as we became slaves of the instruments of metal that gave us power.

It will be the age of ‘military dictatorships’, based in the power of weapons, followed by the age of ‘financial dictatorships’ by the power of gold and then the age of ‘mechanisms’, when the machine became the idol of civilizations.

In that regard, a Free Market is an ‘Economic ecosystem’, regulated by a language of information called money and ruled by company-mothers, whose aim is to re=produce and evolve machines, simple organisms of metal that imitate the functions of energy and information of the human being. As a result the Earth becomes terraformed, from a carbon-life ecosystem (Gaia), ruled by human organizations (Governments) and human languages (verbal laws) into an economic ecosystem (Free Market), dominated by company-mothers, money and machines, which enhance our energy and information but also compete and substitute man in war and labor fields.

Since what you are LIVING is the transition between both ages. we are mutating the planet, and making humans obsolete, substituting them by machines. We are not in control of the Earth – we are slaves of the metal-machines we make… And so history is becoming deterministic in the wrong path. As its directors, animetals, guided by greed and violence, the hypnotic values of gold and weapons, are just busy busy committing suicide and filling their brains of the most bizarre, deluded myths and fantasies about reality and the laws of god, the mind of the Universe, anyone might surely conceive.

∆¹: MEDICINE:

HUMAN ORGANISM

 

MAN AS A FRACTAL ORGANISM.

The program of existence applied to humans. To Live: The arrows of Human Time.     

image047

image050

Medicine & Physiology deal with the 3 networks of the human organism, whose functions connected to the senses enact our time arrows: The Digestive, Energetic System is attached to the senses of smell and taste; the hormonal, blood, reproductive system is attached to the senses of touch and the 6th, emotional sense and the Nervous, Informative System is attached to the higher senses of sight and sound.

In the graph, we draw the physiological networks and senses in the human being. Those physiological networks and its outlets, the senses, are the ‘will of time-existence’ in man, which motivates us to act and exist. Human bodies are made of organic cells, controlled by a nervous system.

All organisms are ‘cellular societies’, organized through networks of energy and information.

In fact, there are 4 elements in all organic systems:

1.   Cellular units, ruled by the temporal drive of social evolution.

2.   Networks of energy or vital space, ruled by the temporal drive of energy feeding.

3.   Networks of information, joined by the temporal drive of informative perception.

4.   Networks that reproduce energy and information, achieving the survival of the organism. Human beings are guided by the will to acquire energy, reproduce and acquire information for its 3 main networks, the energy/blood system, the nervous, informative system and the hormonal, reproductive network.

We have also shown below the senses which connect those 3 systems to the external world providing energy and information for each of those systems, or emitting it to communicate with other beings.

So this is what you are – a ternary system of energy, information and reproduction, fit to survive by communicating with other humans creating reproductive couples and whole societies, connected through well designed economic and political networks. 

In this manner in biological times, the arrows of information, reproduction and energy, become also the origin of the 3 ages of life, as we go from a youth, dominated by energy/blood systems, into a 3rd age, dominated by information. Those natural drives of ‘human time’, whose understanding was lost to science, with the arrival of the clock, are the key to the biological behavior of human beings, guided by their desire to energize, inform and reproduce their body and their mind, through the 6 outlets of our physiological networks, the senses. In this manner, the arrows of change=time that all forms of the Universe follow, become translated into organic behavior: each of those cellular arrows expresses itself through a collective, social network that acts in the Universe through an outer sense:

Animals recognize ‘food information’ through the sense of smell. They are motivated to reproduce, as the sense of touch causes sexual pleasure in them and finally absorb energy through the sense of taste. While the mind/head absorbs information through visual senses, reproduces it through the ear/voice sense and guides its relative energy, the body, through the ‘sixth’, inner sense of feelings and reason.

In the graph, we see how those 4 arrows of energy/information /reproduction and social evolution ‘become’ a human being, which is the product of the biological evolution of those arrows in combinations of simple atoms (N,H,C,O) that after eons of social evolution have become the 3 physiological networks of the body and its senses. Eastern Philosophers recognized that structure, through the theory of Chakras.

In detail: the actions of space-time that informs a system.

Now, if we want be more detailed, those life-death cycles are a quantum sum of small actions that keep building informative warpings and curves in all systems.

In that sense we talk of an unbalance in the program of existence, as there are more actions that create information than more actions that create energy and in the long term, energy is spent, and to restore the balance, the system must reverse when all energy is consumed in the old age that energy erasing the information of the system in the moment of death:

  • Life: E>I: growth of information + Death: Entropy: I<E: erasing of information = 0 sum.

And so for the Universe to be immortal we all must have a finite life-death cycle.

How to elongate it? Obviously by slowing down the rhythm of creation of information during the life cycle, exactly the opposite of what humans do through its actions of information, as curiosity kills the cat.

Let us then consider existence in detail as a sum of those actions of relative energy and information that move the organism or species towards its future.

Reality and all its systems are made of ‘2 components’ , spatial energy with maximal motion and temporal information; which we perceive in all systems of the Universe made of ‘particles/heads/upper informative classes’ which guide body-waves-reproductive classes, forming together space-time organisms. And this also reduces easily our understanding of what is to exist, to be human, atom or any other super organism, as all what beings can do made of only 3 elements is:

∆ energy feeding, ∆ information perceiving, ∆exi: reproduction, ∑œ>U: social evolution of fractal points into larger social beings.

And all beings do this, from the simplest particle that gauges light, feeds on it, reproduces new particles and evolves socially into atoms, to man, which also does this just with more quantity:

HUMAN ACTIONSactions

In the graph, the game of existence since in its detail, as a sum of actions of absorption, emission and repetition of energy and information systems, and final social evolution of those parts into organisms. Now we see in the graph, all what we do as existential beings, which is of course a limited proposition, because we are just 3 topological networks of cells attached to informative, digestive-energetic and reproductive blood networks, as societies are humans attached to energetic property, political, cultural informative networks and economic networks.

In the top we see the 3 physiological networks of a human being, which in the algebra of the fractal generator writes as:

Sp (limbs) < St-bodies > tiƒ (heads).

Now we exist to provide energy for limbs, information for heads and reproduce both with bodies, as all other systems of the Universe, which then once the iteration of the organism happens proceeds to socially organise the whole. And this happens from the simplest forms – particles to the larger galaxies that become Universes. So below we see those space-time actions of energy feeding, information gauging, reproduction, social evolution and generation into new forms for all species.

Even the smallest parts, particles, gauge information, feed on energy, iterate-decouple-reproduce into new particles and evolve socially. It is then this program what the informative quantum numbers (physical systems), Genes (biological systems) or memes (sociological systems) express. But and this is a topic error of the simplex way of doing science of humans today, the informative quantum numbers, genes and memes are Not the finality but merely the way in which each scale expresses a much larger reality – the program of social evolution of the Universe.

As it happens, all of them, gauge information first, ∆o, so we call quantum theories gauging theories. Then all absorb energy to move. And alas! when they have enough energy, even the simplest particles, quarks and electrons decouple, reproducing other quarks and electrons. Finally they communicate energy and information with other similar beings, organizing bigger wholes through networks.

So all systems do seem to have what human anthropomorphic beings consider the properties of life and intelligence, restricted of course to humans and similar forms of life: gauging information from an observer’s point of view (right graph), ∆o, feeding on energy to move, accelerate and decelerate (∆e, ∆a), communicating information and iterating with that information its form, ∆i, and further on evolving parts into wholes, called in philosophy Universals, ∆u.

So we shall use those 4+U actions, (∆a,e,i,o,u), to explain all systems of the Universe and translate its physical, biological and social laws. I.e. we shall find that the 4 quantum letters code for the actions of atoms, the 4 genetic letters for the actions of cells, the 4 drives of existence for the actions of animal life.

And this, vital action system is ultimately the cause of it all. Indeed, we get old because our nervous system absorbs too much energy of the body, as information, and Tƒ-particles dominate the system. We cold be immortal if we weren’t so interested in information. The order of the life worldcycle of system is the integral product of all the small a,ei,o,u actions they perform. All is synchronized through those elements.

So we can conclude this first description of the program of the Universe which all beings that want to ‘last in existence’ follow, as they apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or consciously, with the different mind-languages and its ternary grammars, with the understanding of the 4 quantum numbers that code particles’ behavior, allowing them to obey in terms of the actions of space-time the program of ‘existence’ and its space-time actions:

Screen Shot 2016-04-03 at 20.31.17

In the graph, the ∆-principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the l-number codes its form and informative gauging, ∆i, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).

The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze masses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (mass-media) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.

It is NOT the species, which are qualitative different but the way humans extract information from social masses, û, with memes as opposed to physical systems that use quantum numbers and geometric mappings. Yet all ofthem express the laws of survival and its game of survival, social actions as genes also do, which evolve atoms and molecules and humans from individuals into super organisms,

So I found that besides the actions of motion, energy and information there was an action of social evolution in all beings. That was the program of the Universe, I termed with the 5 letters each for each action of the 5th dimension:

∆æ: acceleration-motion, ∆e: energy feeding, ∆œ: iteration, reproduction, ∆i observer’s gauging of information and ∆û: social evolution of parts into universals. This was the will of survival, which explained the mathematical space-time cycles of physics and Nature,  and history, which merged physics, biology and sociology.

Now this program of existence, completely different from the chaos which the BUG culture try to affirm is the meaning of evolution, in an dog-eat-dog society, or alternately affirms it is a religious yhwh, jewish subconscious mind of banker-priests barking imperative orders that cre(dit)ate the universe with go(l)d, LOL, is impersonal, taoist, absolute and finite for each being, and has a clear pyramidal Maslow order for all beings, which first:

  • gauge information, to move towards fields of energy in which they feed to absorb enough of it to reproduce and then evolve socially into a higher whole:
  • ∆i (gauging information)->∆a(accelerated motions)->e (energy feeding)->exi (reproduction) >∑exi=U-niversal creation.

 

3 AGES OF LIFE, 3 NEΤWORKS OF SPACE in history.

Now, we have explained the obvious: minds-particles-upper classes in control of the information of societies rule physical, biological and social systems. If they do rule them properly the system survives. And to do so they must not deplete, exhaust the energy of the system, the field in physics, the body-limbs in biology, the territory of gaia in the earth. Yet most brains become selfish when time passes and finally do exhaust their field, body and territory and so they collapse and die.

In brief, death is the exhaustion of the energy of the body-limb territory-working class, field-wave systems, by the selfish particle-head-upper class.

And this process while it is natural to the arrow of increase of information of systems can be managed to maintain a constant balance of energy and information, when the head is smart enough to serve the body and make sustainable life, and in the case of loosely connected super organisms,  molecules in physics, herds in biology and neolithic, life-oriented societies without an informative ‘world stock’ brain that sucks in and parasites by anoxia all the system of mankind, in a well designed super organism, where the elite of politicos and financiers caters first to the body of humanity, immortality can be achieved by serving the body. We shall repeat it again:

‘A super organism can be immortal when the informative system serves the body and returns before death and collapse the energy it takes back to the territorial/limb system’.

We humans as biological systems are so evolved and dominated by the arrow of brain information that we die exhausting our energy, but there are animals that serve the body which keeps growing, notably reptiles and cold blood fishes, which live very long. So happens with plants, which keep growing. And there are loosely organised herds that continue for ever as wholes, even if its parts die away. And molecules and atoms are immortal because they find balances between the electronic body and the nuclear, quark brain, and so the electronic body never collapses into the body brain. Yet the more organised atomic systems, stars do collapse into novae, when the building of ever more complex informative atoms exhausts its energy, dying in a big-bang and our bodies die after they wrinkle and collapse all its energy. And our ill-designed societies collapse in a third age of gold profits by war, when all the information of selfish memes of metal reconverts into weapons and kills the organism.

We are entering that age:

So languages do rule the world with its values and create different types of minds and what truly matters and guides the future is information not energy, the cyclical, informative mind and its languages, not the body-wave. We are all lanwaves, languages guiding waves, minds controlling bodies as Aristotle already figured out.

Now, all this is new, it is Complexity and systems sciences, indeed as Hawking said the science of the XXI century, which must become the foundations of social sciences, as it is the philosophy of science that explains the universe in organic terms and history is a super organism.

Let us then consider in more detail the mind-information system of all those super organisms and how it biases information subjectively

As the brain directs and selects the future of the 3 parts of a system, its  flat field/limbs/territory of lineal-planar energy, its spherical, tall informative heads/particles/upper class and its intemediate, combined body-wave-reproductive working classes.

The arrows of time and social scales of human beings.

The most enlightening analysis of Multiple Spaces-Times is the objective evaluation of human beings, as yet another fractal part of the Universe, in communion with its cycles of existence and organic isomorphisms: As all other living organisms, we humans have 2 poles of Entropy and information, of cyclical and lineal form, the body and the head; we live through 3±i ages of d=evolution between birth in the lower cellular plane and death back to it. We are defined by 3 fractal regions, a sensorial membrane, a central spine and our lineal energetic limbs and digestive organs. All those systems are born through palingenetic processes from the same 3 fetus’ membranes, the endoderm, the mesoderm and the exoderm.

We have 2 subspecies clearly specialized in Entropy and information, the lineal, strong male; the perceptive, memorial, cyclical woman. We are also dominated by the reproductive arrow, dominant in life species, as all what we really care for is our families. We like so much reproduction that we are actually transferring our form into metal, making machines of Entropy (transport, weapons) and information that imitate our senses (chips=brains, cameras=eyes and mobiles=ears)…

Thus, man is also a biological knot of existential cycles, whose purpose as everything else in the Universe is to ‘survive’, to maintain the immortality of the human, logic form by reproducing the Entropy and information absorbed by the brain/body system and to ‘evolve’ – to create more complex social organisms of history till reaching the summit of evolution as a species: the creation of a superorganism called mankind, in which humans share Entropy and information through its collective energetic systems (economy) and informative systems (political and cultural structures).

We cannot overextend in the biological description of the human being, which is topologically similar to all other life species. Let us briefly consider those self-similarities:

-Man extends through 3 planes of increasing complexity, the cellular, bio-chemical plane, the individual, biological plane, and the social plane.

-st-1: As cellular beings we are also defined by an iterating language of information, written with 4 dimensions, the DNA bases that form the genetic code. Thus, the cellular plane is ruled by genes, which mostly code the basic functions of the cell and organs, common to all mammals, reasons why we have over 90% of common genes with them.

– We also evolve through a palingenetic process, differentiated only in the last 5 million of years from self-similar apes.

-st level: Humans have also 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive; reproductive=blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems common to all life species. Those internal networks observe the external Universe through the same 6 senses of all other species.

Indeed, if the duality of bodies/heads gives birth to the Complementarity principles of Physics and genre, the existence of a series of basic wills are expressed in our human organism through the senses – our outlets to the Entropy and information of the body and brain. We use those senses to absorb different energies and information and combine both, in reproductive processes. We sense sexual reproduction of the body through touch; we smell the energetic food we eat, and that information used to guide hunters. And finally we taste that Entropy. While our brain perceives space with our eyes, reproduces information with words, and uses the 6th sense of feelings and the limbic brain to guide our reproductive body. Thus the senses are:

– The sense of smell and taste are the negative and positive senses of the digestive system that allow us to choose what to reject and what to eat. The language of the sense of taste has also 5 vowels that can be classified according to the key substances of Entropy and information (sugars, proteins, salt, etc.) our organism require.

– The internal 6th sense of feelings that relate body and brain and the external sense of touch are responsible for the reproductive will, which excites our mind (love) and our body (sexual attraction). Both are reinforced, as in all other animals by the visual and auditory sense, which are the:

– Mental senses of space (eyes) and time (words), which shape our natural languages of energetic and informative perception.

In the graph we observe that man as an individual is a knot of 3 dimensional networks: the energetic=digestive, reproductive= blood and nervous=informative systems that determine our cyclical actions, as we try to feed on Entropy, reproduce and inform our 3 systems.

St+1: When humans perform those individual actions in social groups they create social networks that establish the ‘memetic actions’ or customs of a society, passed from generation to generation as ‘genetic codes’ are transferred from individual to individual. So humans gather in groups to harvest food and eat together; they establish social customs and marry to reproduce; and develop verbal and visual, informative networks that evolve human organisms from individuals into cultural super-organisms, transcending socially into a new st+1 plane of existence: Mankind.

Thus, while we are ruled by the will of our 3 physiological systems, expressed through our biological genes, we evolve socially into macro-organisms called Gods, nations and civilizations, expressed by our cultural and technological memes.

Recap. The biological will of man is shaped by the 3 internal, physiological networks, each of them attached to 2 perceptive senses, which are the languages of perception of Entropy, information and reproductive signals of the external world, achieved through our daily cycles of existence. Thus humans are also a knot of Time Arrows, which seek to feed on Entropy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially like everything else in the Universe.

 

The 3 planes of Human Existence in time.

Worldcycle human life

 

Life is a trip through 3 planes of existence: the biologic, st-1 genetic plane; the individual plane, which expresses the same biological arrows, and the sociological st+1 memetic plane, where survival is reserved to prophets that create a religious God or civilization, the subconscious collective of millions of believers. In the graph, existence is a travel between those 3 planes, the cellular plane to which we return after death, the individual plane and the social plane which peaks in our 3rd age as informative particles of our culture and economic ecosystem.

If we study the human being in time, the 3 ages of human beings are equivalent to the 3 ages of any space-time field. Humans show those self-similarities, both in the physical ‘warping’ of their bodies that accumulate information and wrinkle till they explode back into Entropy in the process of death; and in the different ‘ways of thought’ of their brain that also go from an optimistic, active age of Entropy into a reflective, old age of information:

-St-1: we are born in the inferior cellular scale as a seminal seed, clearly differentiated in lineal energetic males of maximal motion and still, reproductive, informative females, ovum, that mix together, exo to start a palingenetic process of reproduction and social evolution till we surface in the st-scale.

– Max. E: Youth is the Entropy age, dominated by the digestive network and muscular movement. So children are energetic, always moving, passionate about food that they need in bigger quantities.

-E<=>O: Maturity is dominated by the reproductive arrow, its networks and sexual desire. So mature people marry and have family values.

– Max.O: The old age is dominated by information and nervous networks. So old people are wise and know a lot of things, though they have little Entropy left and live in stillness, looking back to the past, before they truly start their travel in time. Thus, a very old man becomes like a reversed, negative child, also passionate about food since he lacks Entropy; but can’t really digest it. He will be emotional, close to his ‘biological consciousness’, but with negative feelings, as he has no future left… except death, when his information dissolves back to the cellular plane.

– st-1: Death, when all Entropy is spent we die and return back in time through a 4th age in which all information becomes erased.

Further on, humans transit during those 3±i ages of life through 3±i hierarchical scales or planes of existence: the st-individual plane; the st-1, biological scale and the 3±i, historic, sociological scale. In terms of those scales of space-time, life is a temporal journey from the lower st-1 biological plane in which we are born as seminal cells into the human plane in which we enter through the discontinuous aperture of our mothers’ biological wombs. Then humans will ‘mature’ in that st-social plane after the ‘rituals of initiation’ proper of all adolescents in all societies, which make us cross ‘the discontinuity’ between youth and maturity.

In that social plane humans will live as individual members of their society during maturity, till in the 3rd age the mind will return back to the mental level of childhood; while the spatial body will continue warping up.

Thus in the 3rd age, the st-mind and E-body suffer a ‘fractal split’ that breaks i=ts E=O harmony (‘mens sana in corpore sanum’), which determines survival, causing the death of the organism. Then through death, the human being will descend back again to the biological, cellular world.

Thus life is a motion back and forth in time that starts with our palingenetic conception in the st-1 biological plane of seminal cells. The graph shows that ternary existence in which the main age is maturity, when humans form part of an organic system as a cell of a nation or culture, in the st+1 plane, enacting social and informative cycles with other fractal citizens or believers, as our senses open up to the social ecosystem, ruled by the political isomorphisms and financial networks of the collective, nervous social system, where we develop verbal and visual perception, till we descend back through the reverse journey of death into the original st-1 cellular, vegetative state, completing our wheel=cycle of existence.

Though we have only ‘individual consciousness’, the 3±i biological and sociological planes do exist and should have their own individual consciousness (DNA consciousness, and collective subconscious of mystique Gods). When we are born we just enter a new form of consciousness after an age dominated by our vegetative, chemical, cellular soul. A fact, which is evident in the ‘borders’ of life: the baby and the old man care mainly for food and chemical emotions, since they are closer to their cellular level of birth and death, our zero sum as dust of space-time.

Recap. Humans follow the same 3±i ages of all biological beings, as they live through 3 planes of existence: the biological, individual and sociological planes.

 

The 3 topological networks of man in space.

image053

In the graph, a deeper analysis10 of nervous control of a body and its energetic and reproductive systems. All those systems of Entropy and information are created by ternary differentiations, which provoke a mirror symmetry with the ternary differentiations of the nerves that control them. For example the digestive system has 3 sections, orientated from top to bottom on the relative dimension of informative height: the upper, mouth, informative system; the middle, reproductive stomach with its attached glands and the intestine, each one controlled by ternary sub node of nerves. Then the stomach has 3 regions; the organs that assist it are 3; the intestine has 3 sub-sections and all of them respond to lineal-energetic topologies (intestine); cyclical reproductive (stomach and attached organs), and cyclical, informative (mouth and taste systems).

If we were to make a topological, spatial analysis of the human being, we would observe that as an st-point we are made of 3 physiological networks/regions evolved from the external exoderm, mesoderm and internal endoderm, which become roughly the origin of our external membrane and senses; reproductive body organs and internal brain. And each of those 3 systems is constructed with the topological characteristics of the 3 regions of any st-point:

  • The energetic, digestive system is the bigger one, made of overdeveloped membranes and connected to the apertures of the skin, forming together an inner/outer self-similar ‘Klein bottle’ (Non-Euclidean jargon), which is the final evolution of the self-similar system we found in the Hydra. It is the more loosely connected of them all; in fact a super-organism that hosts in a ‘colonial’ form billions of external bacteria.
  • The informative brain system occupies the central singularity region, is the smallest of them all and has a highly warped, hyperbolic form, with the maximal, quantized number of cells, which form a network that relates each neuron to thousands of other neurons.
  • The blood & lymphatic, reproductive system communicates both regions, connected to the external skin through the lung apertures and surrounding the informative brain, which obtains 10 times more Entropy than all other systems, as the ‘top predator’ system of the organism.

In physiological terms we are composed of 3 st-regions and networks developed from an initial, spherical 3-layered egg that packed our genetic/temporal information and iterated billions of times to become a macro-organism. Those regions are:

– An external membrane or skin of dense informative cells, the initial exoderm, whose senses invaginated back those informative apertures in a dual parallel st-axis of height: creating the spinal nervous network – the lineal, energetic sub system of the brain that moves the body – topped by a central, cyclical, informative nucleus, the brain.

– An intermediate zone filled with glandular, reproductive cells, ‘invaginated’ by the reproductive, hormonal blood system that joins them.

– And the bigger energetic system, divided into a digestive and breathing network.

Further sub-divisions according to the Fractal, ternary Principle create the 3×3+st+1 physiological subsystems, standard in any biological book, and the st+1 brain, which has a mirror image of all of them and acts as a unit of the social st+1 scale of mankind.

So the ΣE <=>Σ2 O formalism of our fractal space-time is:

Max. E: Digestive System<ExO: Blood & Lymphatic System:exI> Nervous System:Max.O

The interaction between the st and st-1 system is clear: Those networks rule the lower st-1 cellular scale, which become a ‘herd’, whose energetic, reproductive, informative needs and birth to death ages are totally controlled by them; to the point that doctors say their discipline is ‘physiology’, since sickness are the sickness of those networks.

Further on, each of those 3 networks subdivides into new ternary structures of control:

– Max. E: Those networks have all an inner, lineal, quantized ‘body’ – a network of tubular systems that delivers informative, energetic and reproductive orders that rule internally our fractal cells. They are the veins, the nerves and the lymphatic system.

– Max.O: They all have external apertures to absorb Entropy (breathing nose and mouth); information for the nervous system (ears and eyes) and sexual sensations for the reproductive system (olphactory and touch senses).

– E=O: The 3 balanced centers, the heart, brain and genital system become the site of their ‘inner wills’ that enact and control the iterative cycles of feeding, perceiving and reproducing – the will of existence of our collective self that impel us to acquire information, Entropy and reproduce, ensuring the survival of the human form.

It is in fact possible to explain the entire process of creation of humans from their palingenetic seeds through the isomorphisms of ternary differentiation and multiple space-times as a process of creation of those 3 networks in control of the st-1 cellular systems and controlled themselves by st+1 brain and senses, which together create a living organism extended in 3 planes of existence, self-similar to all other mammals. And yet humans have a peculiarity respect to all those other animal beings: to be the most informative species of them all, with the maximal evolution of the informative dimension of height, its visual senses and st+1 10th system, the brain. We are the summit of informative evolution of life and so we shall consider how that informative evolution selected ‘us’.

Recap. The st-scale of human existence in space is controlled by the 3 topological networks of the human being, the informative, nervous system, the energetic, digestive system, and the blood, reproductive system. Each of them is divided in ternary subsystems, informative, external senses, center and lineal networks that connect them with the st-1 cells to control their drives of existence.

  

 

 

∆¹: History

Cultural Organisms

THE SUPERORGANISM OF HISTORY – ITS NETWORKS AND ‘PERFECT DESIGN’

The application of the discoveries of complex sciences to study history and economics..

Let us now show that social organization of all systems through its ‘informative/political’ and reproductive/energetic networks, in order to describe the networks of history and the needed reforms to create an efficient human super organism at the i+1 scale.

A real science of economics and history : The social and biological superorganisms of mankind.

In the graph we describe the main systems and scales of fractal size, which structure the Universe:
In the graph, in system sciences the fundamental concept is a social organism, a herd or group of self-similar forms, which gather together thanks to their capacity to share the same code/language of information and the same energy. Such herds evolve together in complex networks, which survive better than individual particles or cells, acting together as a single group.
Thus, systems sciences recognizes as the fundamental evolutionary force of the Universe the survival capacity of groups, which determine an arrow of future that has evolved the organisms of reality from simple atoms into molecules into cells into organisms into societies.

What is an organism of information and energy? A herd of species related by networks of energy and information, that constantly transform energy and process it in a vital way. How individual species organize themselves into complex herds, that biology calls ecosystems or bodies, or organisms? Precisely through those physiological networks, the key to understand any organism, including human social organisms (nations, civilizations).

In the Universe there are many type or such social organisms. Since “energy never dies but eternally transforms itself”, organisms have an enormous variety of species and sizes, depending on what energy they process. What do they all have in common? All organisms are “societies”, organized by networks of Energy and Information.

The former is clearly the case in all the sciences from physics to biology, where a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single regular formation. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of humans and machines; galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole, of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous system. A tree is a group of leaves, branches, and roots connected by a network of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles).

Atoms share energy and information between them through electrons who finally shape ð orbitals that create molecules. Molecules grow and become DNA, which controls the cell. Cells then radiate until their density saturates the vital territory of the herd of cells. To improve in such small territory the Information and energy of each cell, the nervous-informative organs, and the energetic, blood organs appear. A new, more complex species -the animal, and the man- is born. Then humans increased in social size, forming a new macrocosm -the macrocosm of History and economics- where a lot of humans and machines organize themselves into societies, through words and digital information.

The purpose of this web is to study such organisms; historic organisms (a social organism of humans), and economic ecosystems (a wave of products that interact with human beings), as organic systems; trying to design and improve them, from the perspective of the health of what is best for the survival of man, as the ruling species of that organism.

The structure of organisms

Let us to that aim, understand first the generic structure of a social organism, or ecosystem, parallel words that we will use constantly as synonymous. In fact there are four basic elements in all organic living systems:

1. Cellular units
2. Networks of energy or vital space
3. Networks of information
4. Networks that reproduce energy and information.

When we find those elements interconnected in a vital relationship, we talk of an “organic system”. We can see such organic systems as “bodies”, when all the cells are very close to each other, or as “ecosystems” of herds, when the cells are far away, and the networks are weak. We should not be cheated by the spatial appearance of the organism.

A herd of machines, a herd of insects, a human group is also an organic system, because it has cells, and networks, even if it does not seem to us a body. The fundamental reason we have not arrived earlier in science till Theory of Organisms, to the conclusion that the universe is made of such organic systems is the lack of relativism, the arrogance of man. Men have a hard time believing that things which are not like us, are able to intelligently process energy and information.

We are also unable to believe easily that microcosms and macrocosms are “species”. Yet an organic perception of macrocosms like galaxies or planets, and an organic perception of microcosms such as cells and atoms, is the most logical way of “unifying” our understanding of the entities of the Universe. We might see those herds very close together in which case we talk of bodies, or we might see them extended with a loose organization; then we talk of waves, societies or herds.
A verbal definition of superorganisms

A generic definition of an organism or ecosystem will help to clarify what we mean by a “vital universe”, composed of “universal organisms”. Let us take a template for a micro or macrocosmic organism (or ecosystem) that differs only in the specific energy or information we put into brackets. “A universal microcosmic or macrocosmic organism or ecosystem is a population of [name a particular species], related by networks of [name a language or force] information and networks of [name a kind of energy]”. Fill the gaps with a specific species, language/force and energy and you can define any network-organism in the universe:

– An atomic organism is a population of (electronic) energy and (nucleonic) information, related by networks of (gravitational) information and networks of (light) energy.

– A molecular organism is a population of atoms, related by networks of gravitational energy, and networks of electromagnetic information (orbitals, London forces, Van der Waals forces).
– A “galactic organism” is a population of stars, related by networks of gravitational information, and networks of space-time energy. Their morphology is similar to that of an atom, where the nucleus is the black hole, and the stars the electronic orbitals.

– An “animal ecosystem” is a population of carbolife species, related by networks of light information, and networks of life energy (plants, prey).

– A human organism is a population of DNA cells, related by networks of genetic and nervous information and networks of energy-providing blood.

Historic superorganisms

Complexity, duality and Systems Science study the laws that define an efficient complex organism in physical space (particle/field systems), biological space (head/body systems) and Social space (informative leadership/working class). The importance of this new social science is that it draws from Nature teachings and so it has a set of laws that allow to design a perfect social organisms.

Indeed, its laws are based in the self-similarity of all complex systems, from galaxies to living beings, which are organized by networks of individual particles – cells, stars, atoms – communicated by flows of energy and information. So happens with human organisms (energetic, blood networks andd informative nervous networks) and social organisms (economical, energetic networks and informative, cultural and legal=political networks).

So we can use the sane definition to define the superorganisms of history and economics:

– A bio-historic organism is a population of humans, related by networks of verbal information and networks of carbolife energy.”

– A bio-economic organism, is a population of human workers/consumers and machines, related by networks of monetary and electronic information, and networks of roads and electric energy

The difference between both type of systems, a historic and an economic organism thus is clear when we consider that the ‘organic unit’ of the economic ecosystem is NOT contrary to belief a nation or civilization but a new organization, appeared recently with the beginning of the Industrial R=evolution, called the company-’mother’ whose function is to reproduce a product, overwhelmingly a machine, and then to evolve further and adapt the world to the existence of those machines, creating networks of energy and information for them (digital networks, electric networks, etc.) And this is the first big surprise of an organic model of history and economics: while History is undoubtedly the product of human endeavors, the economic ecosystem is ruled by company-mothers of machines, which follow a set of biological, evolutionary and organic laws independent of mankind; quite removed from the abstract jargon coined in the XVIII century, even before machines existed by classic economists’ like Mr. Adam Smith.

Both organic systems, Historic and economic organisms, survive within the same vital space, the Earth’s crust. What this means according to Theory of organisms is that there is between both a dual process of symbiotism and preying, by which sometimes machines compete with men in fields of labor (productivity laws that substitute workers with machines) and fields of war (where weapon-machines kill human beings). We express this with the concept of the Paradox of History.
Thus, from the previous definitions we can talk of WHealthy systems, when the head, in history the neuronal castes that control, issue and direct society with the law and money feed and share their energy and information with them – their financial credit and just legal orders that direct the body cells to produce the goods the historic organism needs – life based goods, that make us survive. Then the body obeys and moves properly and works and cares also for the head.

And we can talk of a viral, social organism, of a sick system, when those elites do not feed its citizens/cells, do not issue caring laws to protect that body.

III. THE SUPERORGANISMS OF HISTORY AND ECONOMICS: THE DESIGN OF A PERFECT WORLD

The 2 scales of social organization, studied by the sciences of economics and history.

For what it is said it follows that what we call history and economics, is the study at the i+1 level of the networks of information (culture, politics) and reproduction (economics) of the humankind.

And so for such a science to exist, it was needed first to fully understand the Nature of Humans as Organisms, its wantings, will of existence, drives of life and survival needs, which is now possible thanks to the advances of complex sciences and biology; and then establish a simple definition of what would be a perfect social organism of mankind, with the equations of complexity and the biological knowledge of the needs of human beings:

‘History is the study of the i+1 social scale of Mankind, the Human Super-organism, made to the image and likeness of its i-ndividual organisms; as such it has several sub disciplines:

A) Factual History, which studies the evolution of human social organisms.

D) Theoretical History, which studies how to design a perfect world, where the networks of energy, reproduction and information of mankind (ecology, economics & political networks) deliver enough energy, information and produce enough goods for the individual human being to survie and thrive, according to the definition of a perfect super organism:

∑ (Max. ExI)i = (Max.ExI)i+1

That is, the goal of history is to design a perfect world in which Humanity thrives because all its individuals at the human level achieve its maximal energy and information, and have the freedom to enjoy its reproductive and social love functions, as a 10 D Superorganism, which follows the natural ‘program of existence’ of the Universe, which now we shall resume.

The super organism of history. Its networks and organic, social classes.

If we were to compare such design with a biological organism, we should notice that in biological organisms, the nervous, informative language ALWAYS dominates the ‘economic, blood system that reproduces goods in the organs of the body. Only in very primitive organisms, worms, blood dominates over nervous systems. And this of course means, the organism can be easily poisoned because it does not have a point of view, a biological, survival nervous system to guide it.

orgANISMOFHISTORY

In the graph we can see the parallelisms between all systemic, social organisms, in this case a biological organism and a sociological superorganism of history, a nation, America. Both follow the same laws that all the complementary, organic systems of energy and information of the Universe. So we can observe the parallelism between the elements of a biological and sociological organism, divided into: cells/citzens, joined by blood/economic networks that reproduce and distribute the genetic/memetic products of the system, and informative, nervous/legal networks that organize its structure.

It follows from those parallelisms and the ‘social structure’ and self-similarity of the i-dimensional scales of Mankind, that a perfect world, and a proper science of history and economics will take the measures required to maximize the existence of human individuals, their energy and information and reproductive ‘family values’, so the whole, History can also maximize its social networks and structure as an i+1 superoganism, ‘Mankind’.

In the graph all socio-biological systems, including human societies as super organisms, composed of:

– A herd of similar, cellular species, which in a human society are citizens, joined by 2 type of social networks that serve them, by providing to all and each cell for free with the 2 substances that make up the Universe and its fractal systems, energy for the body and information for the head.

Thus we will find in all systems 2 cellular networks:

A dominant brain connected to Informative networks that inform those cells-citizens, in a language they all understand – verbal laws in human societies; nervous impulses in biological ones, to guide their collective actions, evolving them into a social superorganism.

Thus those informative systems deliver two informative dimensions to all its cells: the simplex dimension of information and the complex dimension of communication and social evolution of selfish individuals into peaceful, stronger, coordinated wholes.

And we will find an energetic network that provides those citizens cells with enough energy to feed, protect and reproduce the organism.

So the energetic networks also deliver for free the two energy related dimensions of life: the simplex dimension of energy, food and protection for the body and the complex dimension of reproduction that allows the system to survive beyond death.

In the human body those energetic networks are the blood and digestive systems which deliver to all cells a Universal salary of oxygen energy so they can all feed and have enough energy to reproduce.

In human societies, those networks are made of digital, monetary orders that initiate the productive process of the economic system, made of factories, roads and river veins that produce the food, and welfare goods, we humans need to survive.

And so a healthy human superorganism should deliver to every citizen-cell a Universal salary in blood-money. So they can demand to the economic system the production of those life-based welfare goods, and be able to work and enjoy their 2 simplex dimensions of life, feeding and perceiving, and its two complex, social ones, reproducing and forming part of a society, as Nature does with all the cells of its super organisms.

In the graph, the most extraordinary fact of Modern History is the discovery and evolution of machines, systems, made of metal that imitate human organs, enhancing our capacity to process energy and information, but also compete and atrophy the parallel human organs they substitute (so we become fatter as we drive faster cars and loose intellectual capacities as PCs calculate and spell for us). This process of symbiosis and competition between men and machines can easily be inscribed within the processes of evolution of species in this planet.

Further on it happens at the 3 levels, or ‘scales’ of social organization (i±1) which complex sciences use to define the structure of complex systems and organisms:

– At the i-ndividual scale (i-scale), machines in symbiosis with human beings increase our ‘capacity’ to process energy and information. And the result is a new ‘biological species’, the ‘animetal’, half human half metal-organism, which has become the new top predator species on Earth, since the first warriors covered themselves with metal and predated over the Fertile crescent with bronze weapons. Yet when both species compete, normally the ‘metal-machine’ system wins. So machines, as they evolve are displacing human being from labor and war fields.

– At the social scale (i+1 scale) there is also symbiosis and competition. On one hand machines increase the ‘productivity’, that is the capacity to reproduce goods, which are positive to mankind. Yet they also multiply the lethal goods that compete and kill us (labor machines, weapons, hypnotic visual machines that degrade our mind).

But the true competition at the i+1 scale of social organization is between ‘company-mothers’ of machines, the organizations that evolve, re=produce and adapt the Earth and its laws to the image and likeness of those machines, and human governments, which try to achieve the same goals for human individuals (welfare state).

So both, companies and governments fight for the needed resources to feed with energy and information, their machines and human citizens. The result of that competition has derived into a political division between ‘right wing parties’ – a non scientific term, which refers to those parties that sponsor the absolute freedom and rights of those company-mothers of machines – and left wing parties, which are supposed to put the rights of human beings over those of machines.

And in this i+1 scale, machines are also winning the competition as corporations have become over powerful, transnational and organized hierarchically and efficiently by digital flows of money with centre in stock-markets. So they are displacing ‘de facto’ human social organizations from power. Since Corporations today have free credit to create machines and employ labor, while governments pass under corporative pressure zero deficit laws against the production of free ‘oxygen’= digital money to pay human workers. So human suffer scarcity of welfare goods and machines have all what they need.

Finally at the i-1 ‘cellular/atomic level’, machines are also ‘terraforming the Earth’ to its image and likeness, polluting life resources, degrading the environment, heating the planet and overall, adapting it to a hotter, drier world, more proper of the ‘Mechanocene’, the age of this planet we are entering in, as the ‘anthropocene’, the age of mankind fades away.

But what is more startling, more astounding, more puzzling to the social scientist is the fact that none of those themes is ever discussed, beyond a few groups of ecologists, system scientists and concerned artists and humanists that defend the human world.

How it is indeed possible that humanity at large exists in an intellectual limbus without a proper biological, scientific, objective science of economics and history that discusses in depth and tries to manage the present world and control the evolution of machines and the power of corporations to harness it to the service of mankind?

In that sense there is a more objective view on why History and economics are not today sciences.

In complexity any system is structured in 3 ‘social scales’, the i-1 atomic/cellular scale, the i-ndividual, organic/molecular scale and the social/cosmic scale (physical/biological systems). And so to ‘obtain the maximal’ information about any system we have to explain the ‘3 points of view’, which are often inverse in its purpose, and the relationship of that system with other systems. For example, to describe a human being, we depart from the i-ndividual point of view, but also study its biological, cellular genes, and its social environment, and the relationships of symbiosis and competition we establish at that social level, individual level and even cellular level (Germ’s infections etc).

And so the truth of a science is higher when more ‘i-scales’ and p.o.vs are studied.

And the first question we must answer whenever we confront a ‘theory’ of reality is which point of view and scale we are ‘giving information about’?

it is then when we realize that ‘classic economics’, as it is taught today in Universities and practiced by economists and politicians, is only the point of view of ‘company-mothers of machines’, financial and industrial corporations whose selfish point of view and ‘biological mandate’ is to re=produce, evolve and sell for a profit its financial instruments and machines-weapons, with utter disregard of the needs of ‘History’, the human social super organism, and its cellular citizens, which should be the ‘natural point of view’ of a humanist science of economics and history.

And thus, while economics is ‘very efficient’ in its tasks of multiplying the re=production and evolution of machines, and substitute with them humans in labor and war fields, obtaining huge profits for the corporation and its 0.0001% of globalized owners, to the point that they have as much wealth as 90% of mankind, they have zero concerns with the needs of the humankind, the production of welfare goods of lesser profit and higher human labor, and the future of the species. That is ‘not’ its concern, according to the limited, corporation-centered point of view. And to hide that brutality with their species, what they have done as we shall prove in our section on ‘economic$’, is to invent an astounding number of ‘damned lies and statistics’ which hide with a mask of hypocritical care, abstract equations and numbers, the true purpose of the ‘super-organism of machines’ they work for – the stock market corporation.

It is this fact, that the company-mother of machines rules the world and controls with its financial-media/military-industrial complex ‘super-organism’, the information and power of this planet employing and ruling most of us, from politicos to warriors, from citizens to consumers, what makes economics a very limited ‘truth’ reduced to a non-human point of view.

Here we shall aim to achieve the maximal truth on economics, sponsoring the ‘ethical point of view’ of mankind (the i+1 social scale of our species provided by the ethics of social love that aims to evolve history into a perfect world, where all men can thrive) But of course, we are not ‘bending’ reality as economic$ (the name we gave to the financial/corporative point of view of classic economics) does. So the reader will observe both a factual pessimism about the ‘real facts’ of economics and history, a humanist often brutal critique of the ‘cultures’ of animetals and its bizarre idol- ogies of religious, and social nature, and an accurate description of the needed reforms, which obeying the laws of social complex systems, could make the world a human paradise, where we could thrive at cellular, individual and social level (with proper health-care, human jobs and social peace). We thus include all the points of view of history and economics, both, the human and the mechanical, the i-scale (study of individual machines, and humans), and the social scale (governments and corporation); but, we do have ‘a choice of humanist solutions’, according to D) sciences must serve mankind.

And in this we differ from the pretentious objectivity and neutrality of so many ‘writers’ who justify eviL=anti-live memes as an objective narrative, a laissez faire, a freedom or a polite acceptance of ‘beliefs’. All this is NOT science but just journalism. Since economics and history are ‘humanist sciences’, hence closer to ‘medicine’ and physiology than to any other science. Since politicians and bankers must be the ‘doctors of history which use their knowledge and control of the physiological networks of mankind, to improve and cure the human social organism.

The view of those ‘tellers’ of atrocities in an objective tone, is as insulting to the purpose of humanist sciences, as it would be a doctor who merely explains people they ‘are going to die’, but doesn’t provide any cure; or worst, as a quack that merely gives the person placebo remedies, while getting his money for doing nothing or giving him poisons that aggravate their sickness- which is exactly what our politicians and economists do for mankind – promoting the production of the most expensive machines for profit that throw us of labor and war fields (weapons, digital software, robotics); preaching the end of human labor (productivity); denying our right to oxygen-money (deficit zero laws) getting our money for their pockets and corporations (massive taxation); hence, choking us and eliminating our live hood. And justifying it all because the ‘machine is progress’, the ‘future’ and the $elected 0’% ‘know better’. It is for that reason we need to make an accurate description of ‘where these people come from’ to fully understand the aberration of its corporative-power idol- ogies.

This however would not be necessary if the rest us – humans – learned to control with the most advanced tools of complex systems, the evolution of the planet, and manage the ‘transition from the anthropocene to the mechanocene’, to benefit the whole of mankind.

But to do so, politicians and economists, should do a conscious effort to take the bull by the horns, do their job, which in any physiological healthy system includes the control and distribution of the oxygen-money that activates societies (as countries like China do, growing a healthy 10% annually with far more efficiency and a massive production of welfare goods thanks to the nationalization of their financial industries, which in our ‘choked’ world, we have never experienced).

But to do so, western politicians and economists should cast aside all those historic and cultural ‘idologies’ of money, weapons and machines, coming from ‘primitive ages’ (fetishe religions, tribal nationalisms, mechanist ‘awe’) and develop instead a proper, serious objective science of economics and history, before the collateral effects of the ‘mechanocene’ over mankind – our mental and body ‘atrophy’, degradation and substitution of human labor and organizations by the parallel networks and super-organisms of evolving machines, make the species too ignorant and passive to be able to understand and manage the world for their advantage.

The will of Existence: Feeding energy perceiving information, reproducing and evolving socially.

Now, of course, ne of the main difficulties to create a proper praxis of economics and history is to understand the nature of humans at individual scale, as ’10D Organisms’ – to define the will of the Individual human being i, and departing from it, to calculate the ∑i=+1 social goals of a Human sperorganism.

So far, this has never been achieved because of the meddling of tribalisms, religious nonsense and selfish subjective opinions, to define a ‘nature’ which is crystal clear in biological and complex sciences.

That nature of man, its will of existence, is what we call in biology the 4 drives of life, which complex sciences extends to all self-similar systems of the Universe.

Now we can deduce immediately from the 3+i components of an social organism those ‘wills’ of human beings:

– As we are all systems made of energy limbs, information heads and reproductive bodies, written in ‘complex notation’ as ∑ E x i, exi-stential beings across 3, ∑±1 -scales we will want to maximize:

– Max. E: Feeding of energy. So we need agricultural goods, warm housing, environmental healthy worlds.

– Max. I: perceiving information. So we need education, true information, just legal systems and digital money, the informative digital bit of the economic system, the oxygen that allow us to buy the energy and goods we require.

– ExI: Reproduction, this third drive existence requires ‘family values’, and so we need them.

-∑ Social Evoution: We live as cells of a society where we perform organic tasks for any of its 3 ‘networks’ (energy-reproductive or informative networks of society).

And so what a society will try to achieve to get a perfect world both for the collective i+1 scale and the individual are ‘goods’ and ‘laws’, which maximize the happiness and true existence of each human, across its 4 drives of life, E, I, Exi< ∑. Since those are the needs of their limbs-bodies-heads and social species.

Mind the reader that all systems in the universe in any i-scale follow that ‘will’ or program of existence, as they indeed ‘program’ their actions of spatial energy and informative time, ExI, to achieve those goals.

Indeed, the 4 quantum numbers program an electron to ‘absorb’ energy (principal number)’, gauge information (azimuthal number), decouple with forms of inverse spin (spin number) and form harmonic societies of electrons (magnetic number); all cells code those functions with their 4 genetic letters, all living organisms perform those 4 wills, which BECOME THE MEANING OF THEIR EXISTENCE.

i paused for a time, when I discovered that simple program, and saw all the systems achieving it except HUMANITY=GOD (mystique expression of it) AS A SUPEROrGANISM.

We were the only will denied.

Indeed, even machines through its ‘living organisms’, its company-mothers constantly evolved to achieve those goals. So we were developing ever more perfect informative machines (chip-brains, camera-eyes, mobile-ears), more perfect energetic machines (weapons and transports), and their reproduction was increasing constantly, and all of them were fed with electric or oil energy – even eating our land to make ethanol. And they had unlimited access to digital information, becoming telepaths, and without limit in the money a corporation could get in markets and use for their machines.

But we humans had a billion people in hunger; education was regressing to the infantile, mythic, pre-scientici pre-greek age of abrahamic religions. And true social sciences were censored by the anti-quantum paradox. Social love was denied. People were regressing to the i-scale not even conceiving anymore the existence of a subconscious collective i+1 scale, except perhaps Islam, one of the 7 cultural civilizations of what I have termed, the ‘rainbow’ planet – a perfect social super organism of mankind, briefly described at the end of this central post.

But theoretically it was simple to design a perfect world in which the 4 drives of the will of mankind were achieved.

And so i wrote the ‘main tool’ of a bio-historian and ethonomist, which guided by the fundamental constitution of humanity, Max. ∑ExI, that is maximize our Energy, Information, reproduction ‘x’ and social evolution ‘∑’, the ethonomical ‘frame of reference’, whose goods represented those in the positive field that needed to be re=produced to maximize our collectie existence, and in the negative frame, those lethal goods that atrophied us, substituted our will and degraded us.

Ethonomics, a true science of history and economics:3-ages-of-art

15-human-goods1-1024x940

What goods are those? In the next frame of reference we use the laws of biology that consider human positive goods those who increase our evolution as individuals, improving our bodies, minds and social organisms, as positive goods that should have positive value, and the negative goods that harm our body, mind and social life as negative goods that should be controlled, forbidden and regulated by the economists and politicians that should rule mankind with a human perspective.

In a real democracy, as only existed briefly in r=evolutionary periods in America and Europe, money would be printed as ‘nomisma’, a language of information as the law is, handed to the people through a Universal Salary, as ‘economical voting power’ used to pay the goods voters require, giving ‘demand’ orders of production to welfare companies that would provide us with our needs. Instead in capitalism, money is created by financial and industrial corporations in stock-markets and computer platforms to overproduce their ‘offspring’ of machines, while people are extorted of their money with taxes, which are also handed to corporations or used to subvention the military-industrial complex and make war.

The issue of electronic money in its immense majority (95% of credit) by the ‘Free Citizens’ of Markets, which are not human beings but Corporations NOT by the people or their representatives, is the REAL cause of the endemic scarcity of human goods that cater to our survival (represented in the graph), and the overproduction of machines and weapons, as those company-mothers of machines spend all their money in the overproduction and evolution of their offspring of machines. For that reason we humans are poor and corporations are rich; we humans lack basic needs, like food and education and machines have all electricity… But this choice of investing all our resources in the future of machines NOT in our future is hidden by the ideologies of our ‘technological civilization’.

In the graph, the all too obvious dual solution to the political, economical and existential crisis of mankind

– The issue of ‘yes money’, a new global currency, fusion of the major currencies, Yuan, Yen, Euro and Dollar, at parity levels, 1 Eurodollar=20 yuans = 100 yens, adjusted internally by price, with rights to be printed for and by the people and its governments to kick out a global New Deal, impossible to tumble by speculators (as it would be truly the reference for all other prices).

– And the use of the UNO and other international agencies and forums to create systematically legislation that limits the lethal goods of the industrial r=evolution, specifically the most dangerous of them, robotics that will evolve, displace man of labor and war fields and ultimately according to the laws of evolution, substitute us a the top predator species of this planet.

What opposes to those self-evident solutions to create a human like paradise on Earth based in the most desire, biological, natural goods that our ‘program of biological existence’ determines – illustrated on the bottom of the graph – is NOT the sound nature of those policies, but the selfishness or anti-human goals of financial and industrial corporations, whose lobbies control today the issue of money and through that issue, the policies of our politicos and will deviate those issues to rhetoric, placebo freedoms till the system becomes too chaotic and over powerful in a jungle of metal where man will have no future, but will be ‘happy’ living a virtual reality of ‘fantasy ideologies’ and dream-like ego-trips till one day wakes up to the ‘nightmare of the singularity age.

The democratic, efficient issue of legal money.

However in an efficient democratic system, made to the image and likeness of the efficient organisms of Nature, money would not be issued to earn usury and promote warfare but will be free of usury and would promote human welfare.

When the nervous and blood systems – the languages of information akin to the law and money of a natural organism – give orders to cells they do NOT expect to get back them overcharged. This only is allowed when the orders are wrong and the cell can deliver back a PAIN ORDER to the brain so it behaves. And this indeed, is the second element lacking in our democracies to be true democracies, latter explained with more detail:

– The free issue by the government’s brain of bills of law and bills of money to kick out the ‘actions’ of the body cells of the social organism.

– The existence of a systematic judgment process NOT only an election, at the end of each tenure of a civil servant, equivalent to the capacity of the cells to send pain messages to the brain. Indeed, politicos can scam people because they are NOT JUDGED on their promises fulfillment. So after tenure, the voters should poll again to either penalize the civil servant with A) Jail for clear crimes of embezzlement and social murder; B) financial penalties equivalent to his salary for inefficient job C) equal salary reward for outstanding job D) Re-election for a second and third tenure… Thus by mimicking a social organism – which is always the natural model we scientists should follow in the design of historic and economical ones, a true democracy would be achieved holding politicos responsible.

Thus it is obvious after this introduction to the science of money and the meaning of democracy that the crisis is a CRISIS OF the system, which is NOT properly designed but created by the primitive thinking of historic cult(ure)s of Gold.

And that 2 elements of a real democracy are missed in all our societies – the issue of nomisma, legal money as orders of work, by elected governments, obliged to respect and provide the voters with the promises they made… if they don’t want to be judged…

It is thus evident that the crisis will NOT be solved unless the system changes and a real democracy in which people is handed money issued free of usury and politicos are hold responsible of their promises is established. And this can only be done by a real, physical r=evolution against the ‘Bastille’ of European and American capitalism (Wall Street and the ECB bank, Brussels and the corrupted politicos of Washington) or by a true ‘leader’ of democracy, an ‘Asimovian mule’ that ‘refunds’ our social systems according to the laws of natural, efficient, social organisms in which all the cells-citizens of the body receive enough energy and information to survive.

Man should recognize the primacy of man and hence of his language, the law over machines and money if we want to survive and hav ea future on this planet. Thus we design the proper, efficient models of history and economics with the laws of systems sciences and biology, as offshoots of human disciplines. And affirm that money MUST be ‘nomisma’, fiat, legal money issued by governments and the people to create a just sustainable human world made to the image and likeness of our species…

A social, free democracy & demand economy could create a world paradise.social love

The solution is obvious: a real democracy that caters to the need of the people and it is efficient, as social organisms made by nature are requires at least 3 elements:

– The control of the 2 languages of social power by the collective brain of the organism, the informative/nervous legal system and the financial, blood, energetic one. Otherwise the organism is totally dysfunctional. Imagine your body with two ‘siamese’ heads, each one going a different way, or more accurately with a brain giving nervous/informative/legal orders of motion left, when the heart/blood/economic/financial system acts independently moving the body right. In your body the nervous/informative/legal system CONTROLS the economic/blood system and uses both to ‘feed’ with right information and energy ALL the cells of the body, even if the neuronal ‘people-caste’ obtains 10 times more energy for its commanding role.

Today the system is even worst. It is called a cancer: there is an astounding minority, the 1% of stockratic owners of corporations, with a managerial ±9% that have absolute rights to the entire blood/financial system of the body and give none back, as cancers do, multiplying their wealth, and extracting the meager resources of the rest of the body – a bloated, mindless liver that absorbs all the healthy blood and sends poisonous ‘memes of metal’, weapons and hate-media to the rest of the body. It is like a leukemia, in which the brain of the cell – our verbal, ethic, humanist laws that made us reproduce the welfare goods we need and love and share energy and information with other cells as healthy bodies do – is substituted by the DNA of the virus – our ideologies of human hate, selfish ego-trips, homo bacteria behavior, and techno-utopias that consider machines not life the meaning of it all – that make us reproduce only the viral DNA, poisoning our planet.

Instead we should select through a financial system owned by the brain-goverment, the good fruits of the tree of science that make us survive and evolve our brains and forbid those who kill us and trash our brains. So we would have massive investment in health care, housing, agriculture, education, humanist sciences, tourism, languages, environment, infrastructures, non-fiction information (documentaries free press), a credit handled by nationalized financial industries to private entrepreneurs in all those sectors, who would maximize the efficiency of individual entrepreneurship and the public rationale of non-profiteering bankers, just civil servants with the job of selecting the best purposes for credited companies. While those companies who create lethal machines for our body and brain will have null credit or would be legally banned, despite its higher profits (as weapons and digital trash software are the most profitable goods, in mathematical, economic equations: profits = Maximal price (weapons, the most perfect, top predator machines) – Minimal cost (digital software, that reproduces easily with no limit).

Finally labor will be the goal not productivity, which is exactly the opposite equation of labor. Since productivity=machines/labor, grows when we put more machines and fire more workers:

∆Productivity=∆Machine-capital/Labor

This equation, so simple and easy to understand that a school student can explain it is the mantra of our corporations and corrupted politicians, who tell us the anti-truth that rising productivity will create labor, when it does the opposite.

What those equations of productivity by firing workers and profits by creation of lethal machines tell us is several things:

– Machines compete with humans in labor and war fields and corporations are promoting those who destroy our lives, because their purpose is not human. It is to create a world made to the image and likeness of their offspring of machines, and so they need ideologies that justify that destruction, which are better served in a language we do NOT understand.

– The corruption of the political system is so absolute that they are pushing all the policies that destroy labor and life and citizen’s wealth to service corporations and bankers. So this leads to the 3rd measure (after a real control of the 2 languages of social power by elected governmetns) – a real democracy that ensures politicos will not be corrupted employees, puppets-clowns, house-negroes et al of those corporations, or else citizens can easily penalize them harshly. And again the model to achieve such perfect democracies is Nature and its perfect mammal organisms.

– Indeed the organism is also a perfect democracy, because those commanding neurons are JUDGED-VOTED a posteriori, with PAIN messages by a feed-back nervous power given to the cells. This means in a perfect democracy there would be also a VOTE at posteriori which will allow citizens to penalize those politicians AND BANKERS to the service of the people that ABSORB MORE ENERGY than they are allowed, or lie and do NOT try to accomplish their programs.

A real democracy will vote first in open lists NOT TO PARTIES BUT TO PEOPLE, because there is only a ‘natural social science’ whose purpose would be to BUILD A PERFECT WORLD, ACCORDING TO THE LAWS OF NATURE, designing a perfect social organism that caters to the need of all mankind. So the choice is not of two siamese parties to the service of corporations but of individuals, ethic and intelligent enough to make the best of the resources of this planet. But the main vote would be a posteriori with penalties of jail for crimes against life or fines for monetary gain (negative, pain messages), or re-election for a job well done, or a salary pension if the politician retires.

I then copyrighted a 1000 pages volume with all ‘the codes of the Universe’, in WGA, as i think I had truly r=evolved human sciences and set the basis for what Mr. hawking rightly said would be the science of the XXI century (complexity). It was January 1994, just before my 30th birthday. I was optimist, I believed what I had achieved could become the theoretical basis for a renewal of humanism and social sciences, which could start a new age of enlightenment for mankind. i was of course overall optimist as i did not want to acknowledge the obvious fact that the anti-quantum paradox would do to me what it had done to every previous human activist since the age of Plato…

And so we have now to deal in depth not with the ideal world and the laws of the perfect universe, but with the imperfect human species, and the ‘trial and error’ pedestrian reality, we have created with our dumb, weak, selfish actions, so below the ‘survival level’ the Universe expects for all its super organisms… The world of ‘animetals’ and ‘enzymen ‘…

Yet again to understand this new ‘biological categories’ – humans attached to metal instruments, weapons, money and machines that became the new ‘top predator species’ of this planet circa 3000 BC, with the beginning of the Age of bronze, and annihilated the first attempts to create a perfect world in the Fertile Crescent, in the age of the Goddesses and the priest-rulers with ethic thoughts, when wheat was money, life in community and social love the guidance of i+1 religions of Nature and Humanity – we need to explore the ‘laws of evolution in time’, according to the new discoveries of complexity sciences, its 3 time ages, and the parallelism between form in space and function in time.

So we shall now introduce the other great field of knowledge of complex sciences, the understanding of the two ‘forgotten dimensions’ of time, the past and the future and its causal relationships as systems grow in form in information between birth and extinction.

The laws of times.

The perfect world however does not exist. History is being instead ‘evolving’ mechanical information in a 3rd age of extinction of life super organisms. This is a fact. And we want to understand it with depth.

 

 

Ƽ:

HUMAN LANGUAGES

¡ºts  wor(l)d<I≈eye

So far with little help to complete the ginormous task of the blog I just copied a very old book I wrote on the evolution of human languages, while some parts of our physiological structure are written in the 4th line.

© W.G.A. 1997

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

 

FOREWORD: ART, THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGES.

1. Languages command reality. A biological analysis of minds.

2. The paradox of Goliath: Biological selection based in mind power.

3. The languages-minds of History: Humans, Art, and Metal-minds.

4. Fight between verbal and digital languages: the paradox of history

 

PART ONE: THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGES 

 

CHAPTER 1: UNIVERSAL ORGANISMS:

ENERGY BODIES, MINDS OF INFORMATION…………………………….Pg. 22

1: The networks of social Organisms.

2: Universal organisms.

3: Sciences: Analysis of Ecosystems and Organisms. History.

4: Bodies of energy, minds of information.

5. Memorial Times, the fundamental particle of the Universe.

6. The Vitality of Times: feeding, perceiving, reproducing, evolving.

7. Strategies of survival: social evolution and Darwinian devolution

8. The main laws of Times, applied to the evolution of languages.

9. The law of 3 ages. The law of 3 creations.

10. The creation of man.

 

CHAPTER 2: SELECTION OF MINDS:

SURVIVAL OF THE SMARTEST…………………………………………………Pg. 56

1: The Logic of God, the logic of all languages.

2: Sensorial languages. Why truth helps the survival of species.

3: The Earth-Sun ecosystem: Evolution of Light-based organisms.

4: Linguistic top predators: The creation of the future

5: The scientific method: informative metal-minds.

6: Machines, and digital languages. New Top Predator Species

7. The Dinosaur Paradox.

8. Scientific racism. The selection of species by digital languages.

 

 

CHAPTER 3: WORDS Vs NUMBERS:THE 2 AGES OF HISTORY………Pg. 99

1. The subjective information of languages, a tool of survival.

2. The fight between languages and species: words Vs numbers.

3: How Money values human species.

4. The Paradox of History: AniMetal Cultures Vs Verbal cultures.

5. Technological radiations. Animetals top predators.

6: The fight of ecosystems on Earth:  History Vs Economics.

7. The 2 ages of History.

8. The age of words and verbal science.

9. The age of mathematics.

10. The errors of digital languages: The simplicity of mathematics.

11. Superiority of verbal science: Theory of Evolution, the bio-logical method

12. Survival of man requires a change in our top predator languages.

PART 2:  ART AND WORDS:  THE LANGUAGES OF MANKIND

 

CHAPTER 4: THE HUMAN ORGANISM……………………………………..Pg. 150

1: What is a human organism.

2. The body and the brain of man. Its languages.

3. Senses and organs.

4. The ego: blood and nervous networks.

5. The 3 ages of man.

6. Sex, race and culture: The law of 3 creations.

7: The will of man.

8. The informative will: The mind, perceptor of space and time.

 

CHAPTER 5: THE EVOLUTION OF  LANGUAGES.ITS 3 AGES…….Pg. 178

1. Biological radiations of Languages in carbolife. Man top predator.

2. The 3 ages of languages.

3: Human languages, Truthness, information and fiction.

4. The Galilean paradox. What is truth.

5: Birth, evolution and devolution of human languages.

 

CHAPTER 6:  WHAT IS ART? EVOLUTION OF THE MIND…………Pg. 208

1: Social evolution, The languages of the collective human mind.

2: Art, the evolution of human languages and societies.

3. Market product Versus sacred art

4: Artistic styles: the mind of the individual, the mind of the society.

5. The canon of ethics: Verbal information, the temporal language of man.

6. The lower senses. Human goods.

7: The Canon of  Aesthetics. Art And Human Goods

8. Lethal property, human goods and human rights.

9. The classic arts of mankind: the 7 arts, its human canons.

 

 

 

 

 

 

FOREWORD:  THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGES

‘The smallest point is a world in in itself’

Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality:

The fractal point=world of space-time.

In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin->European->Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and the description are the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best.

Soonly organicism is real in the whole sense of the Universe, while languages-mirrors are local orders.

The EGOCY of our present, entropic age of human civilization rejects this (Precisely because it is becoming dissolved). So we  reject the power of networks – self-mademan myths and tribalism in history. Yet  networks are more powerful and survive.

How this work on languages IS OBVIOUS: LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:

In the graph, which I re-designed from” road to irreality” (: a work by Penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician along his friend Hawking, which shuns off the laws of the experimental method) his view of reality is VOID as in all PLATONIC (PLATO by the way never said that, they should be called Pythagorean, a much more primitive ‘magic view’) of HARDWARE MINDS and LOCALITY. In his view the Language creates the Universe.

In reality the Universe is a fractal organism, and as all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘Space-time’, which are Organic because that is the main property of co-existence in different planes (∆§cales), topological because that is the main property of Spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and Logic, Multicausal, as that is the main property of the dimotions of time. 

So the ultimate causality ∆->T->S IS not Platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties -> T-Logic properties -> S-Topologic, mathematical properties.

In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘Social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the Universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we REPEAT, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆-scalar properties, STopo-logic ONES.

SO WE ADAPT PENROSE GRAPh to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:

The ∆§T BioTopoLogic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking self-similar. And then THE LANGUAGES REINFORCE AS MIRRORS EXPANDED INTO REALITY those properties ordering local territories.

So the graph shows that back and forth  to adequate to how REALITY  IS created LOCALLY by ‘minds‘, which are the language software on the hardware brains of T.œs, ONLY after the language reflects the LIVING cycles (dimotions) of all time-space beings with those properties:

You can see in the graph how it works: First the whole Universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak ONLY THE TERRITORY OF ‘ARISTOTELIAN’ ORDER OR BODYWAVE ENERGY OF THE SYSTEM…

THE DRAWING in original Penrose ONLY had the mind ordering the Universe, as the source and only God in Aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (body-wave) around it’.

So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is AS IN CRYSTALS ABLE TO FORM mirror-images in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or dimotions) are the language of it all:

Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.

The conclusion is obvious:

Languages command reality….

And all of them can be considered valid to do so, though some do it better than others. Visual images>Mathematics are obviously in our Universe of light space-time the best language, from where human specific languages work.

But human sensorial languages are a prior images, not mathematics and words not logic, our specific mathematical and logic language of space and time. While the biological properties are also explained in words. Hence words is the most important language of man.

A biological analysis of minds.

The Organic structure of Systems.

Among the most advanced biological sciences, there is a new discipline called Theory of Organisms.

It aims to describe any system of the Universe as an organic ecosystem, made of similar cellular elements, ruled by networks of energy and information.

Imagine a robotic machine or a human being.

We can describe both as an accumulation of cellular elements – metal atoms in the robot, carbolife cells in the human being – ruled by two systems of information and energy – electronic information and electric energy in the machine, ionic information and carbolife energy in human beings.

Both can be described as organisms.

Of those three elements of organisms, the cellular species, and the networks of energy and information, we are interested in this book in the networks of information of the species.

Languages and informative networks control systems.

Since contrary to what earlier theories of Evolution thought, the information systems of machines are in control of the energy systems and command reality determining the future survival of species in greater measure.

What we might call the paradox of Goliath is clear: Languages control energy forms. Social languages control individuals. So both in biological evolution and historical evolution languages become determinant to know the future and survival of species.

The dual components of information systems: software and hardware

Those networks turn out to have systematically a hardware, a cellular support of specialized elements, and a software, a flow of information that moves through that hardware.

The software are the languages of the species.

The hardware are the brain of the species.

In our example both species, the robot and the human being, have languages of information, that flow over a hardware-brain – digital languages flowing over silicon chips in the robot, visual/verbal languages over neuronal brains in the human being.

Biological definition of a mind.

Those languages are what common people might call the mind of those organisms. Which is therefore real, as a flow of electronic information carried by a hardware substance, the neurons in man, the electronic systems in machines.

We therefore imagine that there is a ‘consciousness’ on those electronic flows, which is what we call the mind. We are ‘electronic’ forms, which perceive themselves as a series of images (the consciousness of sight) and as a series of words (the consciousness of verbal thought), which is somehow the way fields of electronic form perceive themselves.

We consider there is no mystery to consciousness but the mere fact that electronic herds carry a ‘property’ which is integrative information, felt internally as consciousness. And perhaps the most clear prove of this, is the fact that when we used electrons in machines, they somehow arranged themselves with minimal manipulation into coherent images (TV-retinas, cameras), intelligent messages (images and sounds that intelligently keep their form as they travel through space, cables and tubes), and sophisticated thoughts (software programs and mathematical thought.) In all those processes human manipulation is minimal. We do not create the intelligent images of cameras, merely took advantage of those intelligent properties of electrons to assembly them.

Abstract. As we come down through the stairs of the fifth dimension from the absolute cosmos, through the physical and ecosystemic scales of planet Earth, we arrive to the mind of man, ∆ø, which is a scale below that of the human super organism, with a faster rate of ‘nervous information’, based in visual pixels of minimal spatial size and maximal time speed ( S x T = K) defined by a simple space-time symmetry:
I=Eye (spatial view) ≥ Wor(l)d: (temporal – logic world)
So once more we are able to describe with the fundamental space-time symmetry a new plane of existence, in this case the function of the mind and its two fundamental languages, visual thought, latter evolved into mathematics and verbal thought latter refined through logic.
The mind of man in that sense is no different from any other mind of the Universe, or singularity that maps out with reduced languages the infinite cycles of reality to make a ‘coherent’ picture of the world in which it lives.
So ultimately the previous equation is a ‘detail’ of the general equation we have found for any singularity-mind of the Universe that ‘stops’ motion into spatial form, from the equations of the black hole (EFE, General Relativity, where time=motion becomes zero in the black hole singularity), to those of a hurricane vortex, as the ‘eye’ of the hurricane stops motion, to the genetic ‘images’ of crystal DNA or the visual form of Crystal solids, which we write with the formalism of Non-Æ 5D as:
∆ð≥§@
In that sense as mirrors of reality all minds are ternary in its languages, and its languages are ternary in its elements, because all of them are observing the ternary Universe of spatial form, temporal motion and its vital, energetic combinations.
Hence the mind of man has as usual 3 ternary languages that correspond to the 3 elements of reality; the visual language that perceives it all in an asymmetric form, as a series of topological forms in motion, from where we ‘first experience’ can extract the laws of reality (Leonardo’s method: ‘saper vedere’);  the spatial, still view, origin of the mathematical language, and the verbal, temporal complex view with 3 tenses, origin of the logic causal languages of reality.
And each of those languages will have also a ternary syntax structure that we term ‘its Universal grammar’:
visual languages of 3 colors, mathematical equations of two variables joined by an operator, verbal grammar with its human, informative subject, temporal verb that describes an energetic action and entropic object ab=used by the informative subject; music with treble, bass and chords that combine them, (tone of frequencies on time, intensity of the singularity sound and timbre that combines subtle both) and so on.

So we come to the origin of all our mappings of the Universe, the humind and its senses and languages, established around 3 different axial regions of the mind:

The 3 mind races are dominant in one of the 3 axis of languages, visual, entropic, lineal white neanderthal, mongoloid, verbal temporal, and emotional, sensorial psylocephalic black races. They determine in turn its cultural worldview: lineal time and animetal violence in white men, cyclical time and organic information in Asians and worship of life, Gaia Nature, physical, emotional and reproductive memes in black people

But those axis, perpendicular to each other, connected to the 3 basic dual senses to get a ‘scanning mapping’ in verbal (ears), visual (eyes), chemical (Nose) axis that connect our ’rounded’ head to the world, EXIST ALSO IN ANY particle, also spherical, with 3 spin positions- another monad/non-euclidean world. 

And so what is then the 4th and 5th dimension of the mind?

The answer is in the 5TH HOLE OF THE HEAD, the mouth that feeds and kills into entropy other beings, but also TALKS the verbal, informative language to connect with other social beings.

So we SHALL FIND FOR EACH PARTICLE-HEAD the 5 Dimotions of existence in the form of apertures to the world and build in physiology and biology and physics the proper paradigm on how the being interacts through those 3±∆ apertures with reality

Mind races.

The issue of memetic races is very important to the organism of history but more on the negative, unfortunately by lack of understanding of ‘TOPOLOGICAL EVOLUTION’, the science steaming from General Systems and 5D fractal organisms, applied to what it matters in mankind as ‘race’, the ‘cultural races’ of the mind, determined by the 3 linguistic axis, which are the spatial, visual dolichocephalic, white axis, the verbal information, social, evolutionary verbal axis dominant in mongoloid and the height emotional, motor axis dominant in the black cultural race. This ternary classification is the fundamental ‘finding’ of topological evolution, as there are only 3 topological functions in the Universe, and its application to different ‘morphological variations’ of species, both in races and languages (‘topological linguistics’) will allow us to introduce a higher degree of scientificism to the subject:

Needless to say because all information departs from the senses that transform the information in languages, which mirror those 3 elements, the subject of the humind is so extensive and intensive that we could as Descartes did build the entire site, in opposite fashion not from the Universe into the mind, but from the mind into the Universe…

In this post we shall thus consider briefly some of the fundamental elements of the mind, and then branch the article into 3 new articles each one dedicated to the main languages of mankind, culminated with the vital, organic languages that better mirror the Universe…

‘I’ Cogito ergo sum

Let us for starters, only in this post, as the entire site prefers the objective view of the mind as an infinitesimal mirror, to derive reality by inverse fashion departing from the mind as a singularity (which is ultimately what we do in the Disomorphic method as we depart from a seed that absorbs information, orders a territory, grows, lives and dies, in clear steps):

Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality.

 

So if we observed the mind of man through the 3 AXIS THAT CREATE AN INFORMATION SPHERE, THE MAIN MIRROR MIND OF THE PARTICLE-POINT-MONAD OF THE UNIVERSE, we can see now its use, when the organism tries to ‘impress’ reality with the still mind mappings and biased sense of order of the mind-singularity.

But we shall stress once more, the humind is not different from any particle-head with its 3 linguistic axis or dimensions of perception of a plane of space-time.

What kind of pixels the mind uses for that purpose are also not ‘very original’. as we use the pixels of light space-time, our informative plane, we perceive as constant form (hence the constancy of c-speed explained from a psychological point of view, latter connected with its physical equations):

light spacetime minds

the universe has infinite mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors. But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system.

IN THE GRAPH, we see the essential difference when we add information: the mind-singularities that order reality around their center BECOME the ultimate why of all realities. Creation by replication, iteration, mirror image, reproduction of information become the meaning of it all. And so vital properties become embedded.

Now, the question that immediately must be addressed, is how we can prove the existence of singularity minds of information if we cannot see inside its mirrors, the software, which can only be seen in itself in the infinitesimal point that holds its image, non susceptible of direct visual analysis?

The answer is like with forces such as gravitation, invisible to us – through it effects.

So the immediate question is what is the effect of mind-mirrors? To create life, will of survival, biological drives of existence, to reproduce and last, and gauge information and survive.

So the question of proving the infinite mirrors of the Universe, its monad-minds comes to the question of proving the existence of a life program of survival in every point and territory of order around a mirror or still language of perception, born of the confluence of multiple sensational languages, to represent the dimensions of the Universe. As for example a human mind which as all point mirrors has 3 outlets of perception for the 3 direction dimensions (visual spatial occipital axis, dominant in white, brachycephalic, temporal, verbal axis dominant in mongoloid, and inner territory of order with its height inner emotional axis and the nose and mouth ‘land perceptive’ ones,

 

So for the rest of the post we shall study the Humind and its languages:

Screen Shot 2018-02-23 at 7.57.35 PM

In the graph, the 3rd final line of ‘stiences’ ends in the mind and its temporal, logic verbal languages, spatial, topological,mathematical languages and its combination in organic, vital dualist views of the Universe this blog advances a step further, ‘T.œs’ in which Ðisomorphic O-point singularities construct the Universe (3rd line):

disomorphic method2

The disomorphic method studies in a vital, sequential time manner the world cycle of beings. As such is the equivalent in time of the Generator equation of super organisms, a more static spatial expression, on how systems ‘travel through the 5th dimension of space-time’ – which is the ultimate meaning of existence. We divide that travel into a generational sequence, departing from an ∆-1 seed (fractal points), which generate as it emerges from the o-1 unit sphere into a larger 1-∞ Universe a series of asymmetric actions reproducing 3 physiological networks that create the being as an ∆º species of that larger ∆+1 world, where it will live through the 3±∆ ages of existence, studied in detail through its 8 life-cycles, traveling/interacting through social scales as it forms part of a lager super organism, and through the 9 perceived planes of reality, in which it will perform those asymmetric actions of survival (aeiou:motion, energy feeding, information, reproduction and social evolution). So the Universe in all its magnificent iterative perspective or any of its fractal parts reduces to this ‘simple game of exis=t¡ence

So the mind creates ‘locally a diffeomorphic Universe’ around its relative point of view, which is its relative ‘still-linguistic mind mapping of the whole’: §@≥∆

The mind stopping motion and reflecting its pov in biased actions.

I. TRUTH IN LANGUAGES: MAX. TRUTH = MAX. POV. RASHOMON TRUTHS.

The justification of the Rashomon ‘effect’ or Rashomon truth, the concept used in this blog to explore the truths of all systems, departs from a simple reality: the Universe is a fractal organism of ternary scales that co-exist together, ternary time ages/dimensions between entropic death and social, informative generation and multiple topologies.

So as all those levels happen in the same being at the same time and in the same ‘closed space’ of a super organism, within a given membrane that breaks it from the rest of reality to observe and extract the truth of the system we must cast our linguistic analysis from all those perspectives, which we resume in four, the ∆§ scalar view, the temporal view of its world cycle, ð, the spatial simultaneous organic view… and the languages we use to observe all this which will mirror a ternary syntax, @, from a point of view or mind, often biased to observe the event from its advantageous biological needs.

So S, @, T, ∆, are the minimal elements to observe reality. But how we ‘connect’ them? Here is where we need the most important, yet less understood element of reality – the vital operandi that connect them through flows of transformative energy, ≈, scattering motion, < and implosive in-formation, > (lineal and angular momentum in physical jargon), whose exchanges constantly adapt reality. So we write the simplest ‘Fractal Feed-back generator’ equation, which ALL languages model in its syntax, with those 4 elements and its a(nti)symmetric operandi (ab. for symmetric, ≈, antisymmetric, < and asymmetric, > relationships between them):

Γ.                            S@<≈>∆ð

This is the essence of reality. Why we group space and minds? Easy, because space is the perception of a simultaneous still reality which IS NOT ‘real but’ a slice of the infinite real motions of the Universe, stopped by the languages of the mind that lock in a mirror image in its smaller finitesimal mind reducing reality. So we can also write the previous equation in its simplest mathematical formulae, or equation of the mind as:

O (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (timespace cycles of the Universe) = C-onstant world view: linguistic mapping.

On the other side thus we write ∆ð, the REAL UNIVERSE OF INFINITE TIMESPACE CYCLES IN MOTION, as the substance of reality is MOTION, not space-form. This little understood fact of reality, proved by evidence that all what exists, including particles are motions, and form are angular momentum, cyclical motion seen as still form when it is very fast, as the ‘fixed’ wheels of a bicycle seem to us a solid form, IS the key to fully grasp why THE UNIVERSE never stops. Why there is balance between vortices of mass (galaxies) and big-bang entropic vacuum – the only element reductionist physicists use to describe it in their faulty big-bang WHICH REJECTS gravitational informative forces… Why ultimately all is a zero sum of lineal motion and cyclical angular momentum, closed in vital energy cycles. 

So it is ALL really easy to understand when we get to the final principle. And a good language will be one, which makes a best mirror with minimal deformation of all what we have said.

Problem with huminds (ab. human mind) is that they DONT MAKE good mirrors, but ARE COMPLETELY SELF-ABSORBED by the paradox of the mind-ego, who thinks his still mapping of reality is the whole Universe, not a simplified mirror, so what huminds have been hard at doing for 5000 years and counting is to DENY, that motion not their STILL mapping is the substance of the Universe, that they are NOT the centre – the still mapping distorts and makes them the centre, of NOTHING, not even of scales, which they also deny, as they deny reproductive properties to quarks and electrons, etc. etc. I am frankly completely fed up of huminds, including scholars, which are busy-busy for 5000 years inventing false dogmas about the self-importance of man, first of religious origin, then of scientific origin – even worst because they believe even more in its truth, such as the previously explained ‘dogma’ of the big-bang. So we start with the clear picture of the homunculus absolute relativity before entering into linguistic structures:

So YOU ARE not the only intelligence. Languages perceive in themselves, in the pan psychic Universe. You are NOT the best talker. Even an atom speaks better geometric mathematical languages. You are not the preferred scale. You are NOTHING: AN Infinitesimal mind mapping in a 1 dimensional minimal ‘bit’ language words, reality with a distorted self-centred view. OK?

Epistemology and the order of knowledge: the scientific method.
MIRRORSIn the graph – what is wrong with ‘physics’ and increasingly with mankind can be resumed in the ego paradox. The equation of the mind is rather simple:

The humind is thus the ‘linguistic singularity’ from where all what we talk about, perceive, and construct is made. The humind and its languages of perception are thus the ∆º scale surrounded by the ∆±¡ biological, social and physical scales which through ±4 planes of reality surround us and are influenced and communicate energy and information with us.

We humans are just ‘finitesimals’ of the ego paradox: o-point x ∞ Universe = constant mind.

So the Universe is out there, one and single; but it does not fit in the mind. And the mind reduces it to languages to perceive it, which resumes the main properties of the Universe, which are first bio-logical rules of space-time existence (the Universe is a game of survival of space-time beings, which constantly try to reproduce their information in ‘fractal seeds’ that latter evolve socially; the Universe is a vital fractal, and the rules are simple), then logic (temporal rules only) and then mathematical (spatial rules only), and then the human vision of those rules (artistic space, verbal time, ethic, social evolution of parts into stronger wholes). And so all those languages are mirrors.

To get the perfect focused mirror, the maximal knowledge is the goal of the Philosopher of science. The physicist specially since the classic age closed with Einstein, has denied this. And puts the mathematical platonic mirror (Copenhagen interpretation) first, subverting the scheme. And so it ‘believes’ today IT IS NO LONGER REQUIRED to observe the scientific method, and first watch the physical world (experimental evidence), then follow the rules of science (linguistic coherence, simplicity, economicity, etc.), and thus create knowledge (human mental perception). Further on, the physicist connects the human world with the physical world, and as the ego grows, it pretends as Hawking and so many other scientists do, to impose its mental view into the physical world, as if it were a God creating the physical world.

But that is not how reality works. It is all more humble. We cannot change the rules of survival, just watch the physical world, learn the rules, make perfect mirrors of those rules, obey and survive. Because the ultimate language is bio-logial: those who have huge childish ego, disobey the laws, become the staple food of the Cosmos: children is what predators eat. Ego-centered turtles, hatched which enter directly into the mouth of the lizard – in our case the mouth of the black hole.

How energy becomes information: Energy never dies.

The process of existence, and its arrows of organicism are intimately related, as they evolve into each other.

If the first act of a living organism is to feed, its second act is to transform that energy into information, and then perceive it. Energy never dies but transforms itself into information. In this manner feeding becomes information. The simplicity of the Universe is awesome. It should not surprise us. After all we are in a Universe with only 2 parameters. So from one energy, comes two, form, in-form-ation.

Information, the second substance of the Universe.

The Universe is made of two substances, energy and information. Both have opposite properties, and yet both attract and mix each other, in all kind of macro-organs of energy and information, that we call bodies and brains. If in the microcosmic organisms of atomic nature, information is seen always as a force, as we cannot easily study the microcosmic inner organs that process energy and information inside the atom, when we grow in size, the organism becomes visible, and we recognize an organ of information, and sensorial organs that absorb the forces of the external Universe.

In this manner information translates from micro to macro sizes with its properties. What are those properties? Information is small, complex in form, cyclical, stored in time, more than in space, in logic dimensionality, in languages, made of very complex, very small, very fast systems of sharing diminutive flows of energy, called in-form-ation.

Each language perceives a partial truth

But why there are brains that absorb tiny flows of energy with a lot of form, called in-form-ation?

As all in the game of existence, because to accumulate information helps you to survive, to locate energy and feed and continue the game of existence.

What information does is to offer an organism maps of the Universe, virtual worlds, complex representations of reality, with a lot of formal detail, that map out the Universe and helps the organism to survive. All organisms perceive and react to information in one or other manner, and we call that property of organic systems, perception.

The flows of energy that become information in the brains of organisms, cause the organism to react to the external universe. That is the second arrow of life.

After feeding, organisms transform energy into information and react organically to that information.
Bear in mind though that information comes in many shapes and forces. So each brain perceives a different information, a different map of the Universe…

Truth and perception: multiple languages, multiple truths

If you smell a carrot you have a certain perception of the carrot, if you see it you have another perception, if you use a microscope you have a third perception, if you eat the carrot you have a fourth perception. Each perception is a relative truth on the existence of a mass of energy and information known as a carrot.

Yet you will only consider a ‘scientific description’ of the carrot, the numeric truths related to scientific measure; the photographs and light perception taken on the carrot with scientific instruments. However a rabbit does not need the scientific method of metal-instrumental evidence, to smell the carrot without seeing it.

He knows through smelling information that the carrot is. Thanks to such information he will locate under the Earth a carrot, faster than a scientist. Smell is part of the truth of the carrot, and the rabbit is an intelligent thinker of carrots in smelling terms. If for the scientist the light image of the carrot is the carrot, for the rabbit the smell of the carrot is the carrot. He just has a different approach to knowledge. Yet neither of them has all the truth on the carrot, which only belongs to the carrot itself. For the same reason we say that light perception and scientific truths derived of measures taken with metal-instruments are only partial truths, partial languages of perception of the total Universe.

It seems proved that light space is only 1-10% of The Universe. That light only scans 1-10% of the total space, perhaps more than the nose of the rabbit , but still very little, to make the kind of arrogant statements that the scientific method makes. The rest is dark matter which exists and communicates with other forces. This implies we will never be able to know totally the Universe by the scientific method, which is like a blind ‘smelling of the Universal carrot’.

The Universe is a mass of energy and information, which stores the truth only into its total self. You are the truth of yourself, and any perception of you will only be a linguistic approximation to your total truth- yourself.
Digital science however denies this, with an arrogance proper of inquisitions of thought.’

Since what we call the scientific method affirms that reality and evidence, total truth, comes from ‘scientific’ measure of distances and spaces, according to metal-eye machines that perceive space [telescopes today evolved into cameras] and metal-clock temporal meters [today evolved into computers].

All other languages of time and space [such as human verbs and eyes] and the worlds they might create, are not relevant to science. If anything, the error of subjective arrogance, proper of Middle Age religions, grew with science, that limits evidence of truth and existence, to beings that can be perceived and measured with metallic instruments, and clocks. Let’s consider with a critical eye such approach to knowledge.

Dark matter exists not only in the outskirt of Galaxies, but by mere logic, we have to postulate that dark matter exists here, around us. That there are many systems of communication that we do not perceive with light. Even within you, as acupuncture proves, there are structures of energy and information that cannot be ‘seen’. After all we do not see gravitation and yet it regulates the movement of all masses.

So true knowledge would be a method of understanding the Universe, that would allow us to have strong, probable truths about the 90% of what it is not perceived by the scientific method, of light-clock evidence.
In a world of partial information, truths are always relative probabilities, guesses, approximations to Reality through a language with partial information. We conclude that the scientific method of ‘total evidence’, and all the statements of science in that path, are pure, naive arrogance of which metal scientists are so often guilty. One of the fathers of science, Mr. Kepler wrote in his book: ‘I am writing a book to be read either now or by posterity, it matters not.

It can wait a century for a reader, as God Himself has waited 6.000 years for a witness.’ Yet the witness was not Mr. Kepler, self-appointed the only intelligence comparable to that of God=the Universe; but the clock and telescope of Mr. Kepler. One of many linguistic witnesses of the infinity of linguistic perceivers that the Universe hosts.

The truths of Mr. Kepler, were mere measures of the rhythms of energy feeding (gravitational space-time deformation) by stars; not the absolute truths about stars. If you are an ant that sees men eating=deforming food everyday at 2 o’ clock, in the refectory of your limited Universe; you might think men are automata, and you know all about men. Yet you just will be an ignorant ant. When Mr. Kepler and Mr. Newton saw how celestial bodies deform space-time energy into gravitational cycles with regularity, they displayed the same arrogance of judgment. Now we know that closer to the center of galaxies, where stars are more evolved, they have abnormal movements, maybe free. We know about stars – about the Universe – very little compared with what we ignore.

The conclusion is that truth is not the function of a single language, but the accumulation of perceptions with many languages, that inform us about the Universe. That no language is superior to other. A language creates perception, a map or virtual world that represents reality but it is not the true reality only the accumulation of languages, and perceptions brings us the absolute truth:

Partial, linguistic truths=Total Truth of the being

A form of knowledge as classic science based in a single language (mathematics) that cannot even acknowledge those linguistic limits to its inquire, is far more primitive in its quest of truth, that a theory of languages, that considers relativism of perception, and creates from that relativism, a wider theory of knowledge, based on the existence of multiple truths and minds, and ways of perceiving reality, one for each language of perception of The Universe.

A theory of Truth: the linguistic method

If we want to advance beyond the scientific method, or the smelling method or the verbal method, we rather start to explore the Universe with all the languages of man, and accept the existence of languages and minds beyond human perception that we cannot decode. Such knowledge requires also to use a different method of knowledge besides the scientific method. Since the scientific method is ‘unidimensional’, ‘uni-linguistic’ and accepts only mathematical truths. True knowledge however is by no means reduced to a single language as the scientific method is.
On the contrary in a linguistic method, we are obliged in the research of Universal Organisms, to use all languages and informations we can gather.
We see, and smell, and touch, and observe temporally with words the species of the Universe. We have many languages of perception besides mathematics.

So once we have gathered information with all those languages – including mathematics and the scientific method, perhaps the most important method of knowledge, that we do not reject but merely put in perspective – we can use the concept of analogy, and observe what all those informations and languages have in common. Only then we will have an analogic, probable truth, made with multiple informations about reality. We might call such wider method, the linguistic method.

The linguistic method searches for languages and virtual worlds – minds constructed with those languages. It compares and extracts common formal laws from all information, and temporal languages of perception. In this manner we advance a step deeper in our search of knowledge. Such linguistic vision of the Universe allow us to jump into a theory of languages as means of perception and communication between Universal species that share information and energy thanks to those languages. Now we will be exploring not only the language=virtual world of light [science], but also the fact that there are many different languages, that create many different virtual worlds, representation of the Universe, which in general have a purpose.

The purpose of those languages=virtual worlds is to ensure the survival of the species which observes reality with that virtual world of perception.

Relativity of virtual worlds: minds

It is then clear what is perception: the knotting, the inner-form-ation of universal energy that becomes formed through the language, organized into shapes by a linguistic brain.

That brain perceives the form as energy goes through its centers of perception. You perceive as you see electronic images, made of light-energy, a computer perceives as electronic data made with electric energy flows through its center.
In the organic Universe, all knots of information, all spherical, cyclical brains perceive and trans-form energy. Each one uses a different language. That does not matter. Only the arrogance of man denies that a rabbit perceives the carrot with smell as well as we do with sight, or a computer does it in mathematical terms.
In the relative stillness, and focus of a brain, that acts as a linguistic mirror of reality, the language traces a reduced version of the Universe, and that mirror-image is perception.
Languages are living species, they perceive.

Even a computer is a perceiver of digital languages, that once awakened in a robot body will also move and have a second will of organicism , besides informative perception, and energy feeding.

The Ego paradox

We could resume the nature of perception, in the Ego Paradox main cause of behavior of Universal species. Every species considers himself the center of the Universe, in as much as it perceives from that Universe only a certain part of its information, processed by the mind and the limited informative languages of the species.

In fact a mind is a Ego paradox, what a physicist would call a ‘quantic knot’, or deformation of spatial energy into temporal information, into form, into a mind. You are a subjective knot that deforms reality from your point of view, from your frame of reference, from your ways of perceiving, and smelling and hearing reality. Reality is not your Ego paradox; reality is something else, that you hardly understand.

The Disomorphic method and the ternary grammar of languages.

In the graph, the scale of the I=Eye< Wor(l)d, the Time<Space view of man as a mind, which compresses reality, ∆† INTO A LIMITED NUMBER OF HUMAN SPATIAL FORMS, ∆ø, the 3 physiological networks of man, then will become the cellular ∑∆¡-1 herds ordered and opened to the external world through the senses:

 

WE THUS talk of our I=Eye, as the origin of our self-centered ego – an image of the Universe reduced to our perspective used to navigate our exi=stence made of eye-spatial experiences and expressed as a flow of time through the wor(l)d and its verbal tenses of relative causal past, present and future. Those are our primary languages of external perception, to which we must add the language of feelings of internal perception.

In that regard languages are intrinsically connected to the 5+1 senses, mapped out in the next graph and studied in detail in the fourth line on ‘man’ (whenever I pour my research on it ):

Of those senses, man has atrophied some, increasingly today reduced to the visual, spatial I=eye sense due to its attachment to virtual screens – hence reducing its social sense, mediated by verbal/ear thought.

Within those restrictions of sensorial perception of information, it is obvious that truth will always be related to the languages of the mind. And it will increase when we increase our languages of perception. So as total is only on the being, maximal truth is a kaleiodospic view on multiple languages.

Thus a truth will be higher when our linguistic image of reality has better ‘syntax’ to parallel the exi=stential syntax of the Universe (the generator equation, Sp< =>Tƒ), with our 3 languages: logic, temporal words, geometrical, spatial mathematical and visual images, which are the 3 legs that put together create a scientific truth:

Scientific, linguistic truth= Experimental, visual data + Logic, temporal truth + geometric, spatial truth.

Yet beyond our scientific/mechanical and human/artistic senses, beyond our I=eye+word, based in light images there is an even wider world with more information, the gravitational, invisible world, which might be mapped out, gauged and measured by quarks and masses.

The relativity of all minds that only decode part of the total information of the entity creates a new method of knowledge, the informative or linguistic method, which validates the existence of all kind of languages and senses to give us a more complex, multiple image of reality that a single language cannot provide:

‘Only the organism or universe stores all the truth about itself. If we give to that absolute truth a probability 1, the highest probability of truth will be the maximal number of points of view over the organism, expressed with the maximal number of languages.’

Since there are ‘multiple spaces-times and points of view’, the linguistic method states a higher probability of truth is achieved with several perspectives on a certain system – as each point of view will create a self-similar image of the Universe, and so by comparing all those self-similar images we can obtain a kaleidoscopic image of the whole. And so in the same way a circle is not drawn with a pencil but born of multiple flows of energy and information that converge on it, a truth is not only mathematical, but man has at least the spatial, visual language, the verbal, temporal language and its two synoptic equivalents, mathematics and logic; and it has 5 senses, which give us other points of view, despite the belief of physicists that ‘the language of God is mathematics’.

The linguistic method however validates the dictum of the Upanishads: ‘the languages of god are infinite’.

And so knowledge must follow a simple scheme:

-First we define a scale of depth on the analysis of the metric measures of the 3rd paradigm (what and when): monism, dualism and the ternary principle, the highest form of knowledge. Then we apply the ternary principle to the 3 symmetries of the Universe:

– The analysis in space of the 3±st topologies of the fractal point and its interåctions that create the being in space.

-The analysis in time of the 3±st ages and sub-ages of the existence of the being.

-The analysis of the being in space-time as a system that co-exists in 3± ∆ scales of reality.

– And we try to do this from as many languages of perception, not only mathematics, as possible on the being.

Recap. The linguistic method that widens the metric paradigm starts considering not only the ‘what and when’ of metric measures, but also the knowledge provided by other languages; and then it analyzes it from 3 ternary perspectives:

– A spatial, topological analysis of the 3±st regions of the being and its relationships between them as a whole.

– A temporal analysis of the 3±st ages of the being and its transitions and sub-ages.

– A space-time, analysis of the st ±1 scales=planes of existence of the being and its relationships as a whole.

Only then we shall achieve a deep knowledge of the entity.

I: HUMINDS: TERNARY DIFFERENTATION

 

3 topologies

Systems are ternary systems of informative spherical particles-heads (the geometry with max. form), reproductive body-waves that follow its linguistic orders, and lineal limbs/potentials used to move the system. The language thus rule the system and selects its best species, but its position varies according to the ‘force’ they gauge.

BECAUSE MINDS map reality they are ternary in language as there are in topology only 3 forms/functions of space-time, lineal entropy-motion, cyclical information, and its combination, hyperbolic, reproductive energy.

In the graph we can study those 3 topologies as the lineal  fastest geometry of moving |≈ limbs/fields; the hyperbolic, ≥, reproductive geometry of body waves  and the O spheric, informative topologies of particle heads, which ensemble different species. We can define them in relationship with the actions of beings or relate them to the human sensorial outlets that introduce the 3 languages of information of the human mind. This classic approach of anthropology is now revalidated to establish 3 fundamental linguistic cultures that will permeate the world of visual, verbal and sensorial mind-people.

As such those  there unique mathematical topologies encode the ultimate program of the Universe, the construction of complementary systems, which merge the three properties:

  • In space. So all systems have entropic fields/limbs, over which a hyperbolic/body wave reproduces the form of the system, guided by an informative particle/head.
  • Or in time. So all systems start in an age of young entropy motions, followed by an age of reproductive energy and a third age of warping of information.

The astounding simplicity of this scheme, allow us to classify a ginormous range of systems, including those of human races… of the mind, as in the graph above.

So we talk of 3 ‘races of the mind’, which are complementary to each other and define 3 ‘cultures’, also complementary, according to the 3 dominant axis of the mind:

  • Max. Entropy: the white, dolicocephalic, visual man, which gives birth to the lineal, animetal culture of the west.
  • Max. information: verbal brachicephalic mongoloid man, which gives birth to the cyclical cultures of the east.
  • And Max. reproduction: tall, psylocephalic black man, which gives birth to the sensorial cultures of Africa.

That is the only relevant, complementary ternary structure of races… of the mind, which follows the general ternary structure of the Universe in:

  • Space: 3 only topological geometries, and dimensions, just explained.
  • Time: 3 relative ages symmetric to those topologies, which in the human case correspond to the 1) ‘young, informative’ mongoloid people, with a clear case of neoteny – that is, suppressed evolution of the body and limbs to enhance the evolution of the head, which is bigger in children and make mongoloid psychology clearly informative but also passive; the 2) body-reproductive-sensorial black cultures, in balance between entropy and information, and the 3) white, energetic limb-oriented culture, always moving, running and assembling things with its hands.

And so in terms of function, the white entropic, destructive culture is the white man, the body-sensorial, energy oriented cultures the black man and the informative mental culture the mongoloid.

Now, before you get berserk with your tantrums of political correctness and pseudo-science, disclosure:

I am a white male, mixture of semitic, germanic and basque sub-cultures.

But since the races of the mind matter relatively compared to the memes and education you receive, I have evolved, became taoist when young, learned of all cultures, travelled the world and recognised the complementarity of the 3 arrows of the Universe. And so should you, if you have any capacity to self-reflect. 

So keep for yourself the tantrums. And try a bit of self-reflection on what we, the white males have done to the planet, because we are still doing the same – destroying it and cheering our love entropy above energy (two terms often confused, energy has form, information; it is in fact a mixture of both, entropy x information = energy; entropy on the other hand disorders information, destroys it – it is the arrow of death).

The entropic culture reduces reality to entropy theories.

2 only facts we must stress about the ‘entropic, visual, white macho man’.

  • The white man is the animetal culture par excellence, the culture of war, and ALL the 800-80 years cycles have been ‘his’ cycles. Of course, others have imitated. But the aggression always comes from us first.
  • The most extreme ‘lineal cultures’ of the white man, warrior semite ‘arabs’ today protagonists of terrorist jihads, and germanic lineal agglutinative mind wor(l)ds, the ‘genociders’ of people ‘par excellence’ have NOT changed their memes that much; the germans perhaps seem a bit more civilised in Europe but are now at ‘it’ behind the first singularity machine of extinction (LHC at CERN trying to do entropic black holes and big-bangs); are leading the robotic r=evolution that will liquidate mankind and destroying welfare Europe, and above all, they have created the ‘aberration of thought’ which we all revere, called lineal time, and lineal physics, where a phenomena found in entropic gas/heat, BECAME BY DECREE the only arrow of time of the Universe.

So you will study that ‘the Universe is dying’; that it was born of a huge big-bang explosion; that death is therefore the meaning of it all; just because for centuries the germanic northern european cultures of war have made of manufacturing weapons of mass-destruction their tool of power, and exported their concept into their worldly view of the Universe.

Fact is the Chinese culture of Asia understood cyclical time, and it is far more in tune with the yin-formation and yang-entropy, which combine to reproduce the ∞ energy beings of reality. This is NOT the theme of this post, treated elsewhere in articles of general systems sciences and my professional blog on 5D metric, but it is worth to notice the cultural ORIGIN of the reductionism of physical theories of time, always portrayed as a ‘lineal entropic motion of space’:

In the graph, it is self-evident that all systems of the Universe do have cyclical clocks of time, to regulate its information stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, either physical cycles, biological, circadian cycles or technological and social evolution in the cycles of history. Why then we believe in  lineal time and entropy big-bang theories of the Universe?

Answer: SCIENCE IS ALSO BIASED BY POWER AND CULTURE, and weapons, white cultures have imposed their worldview, specifically northern european germanic cultures of agglutinative long words and swords, evolved into cannons and booms. So we have a ‘big bang’ theory developed by Mr. Gamow of A-bomb fame, and a single entropic arrow of time, developed of the study of the specific ‘entropic state of matter’ (expansive gases), which helmothz blew up to cosmic proportions. And we still disregard the arrow of inverse information – which in states of matter is the cold crystal forms of solid matter, which order and center the most complex systems including planets with central crystal forms.

So think twice every time somebody tells you ‘it is science’. A few centuries ago they would have told you it is religion. And you would have also believed the ‘tantrum word’. It is CULTURE first.

TOPOLOGICAL anthropology.

Let us then introduce the basic tenants of topological evolution, from where we will depart to understand races and cultures.

In the graph, amazing as it seems, military power has blown up the lineal concepts of the white, dolicocephalic, visual, motion-oriented germanic cultures into science. So today despite the obvious cyclical nature of all time clocks, and its three ‘elementary arrows’ (which together form a π world cycle), we ‘believe’ entropy is all’.

Yet The essential fact about the Universe is that it happens in space and time, and so it happens as a series of topological events (topology being geometry in motion), whereas THE ONLY 3 TOPOLOGICAL forms of the Universe, lineal, hyperbolic and cyclical forms have the only three time functions of reality: entropy (as the line is the fastest motion), energy (where a hyperbolic body-wave combines=iterates both) and information (as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space).

In brief, systems are then designed with 3 parts, an energetic limb/field system, lineal as the line is the fastest distance to move; body-waves that reproduce the system with a hyperbolic topology, which is the more versatile and reproduces both energy and information; and an informative particle-head, which processes logic, temporal, memorial information and guides the system.

It is this ternary structure what then becomes in all its variations, the fundamental ‘organic system of nature’.

We shall then find that through life systems first become young-energetic, then reproduce their body and finally accumulate information in its 3rd age in his brain. But the system needs the 3 elements to survive”

Spe (limbs/fields/territory)<wave-body-reprodutive class>Informative head/particle/neuronal class.

It means we can assembly forms in the Universe using the 3 topologies of reality and its 3 functions:

BIDIMENSIONAL

So systems evolve as ternary organisms in space, with 3 functions: feeding on energy and using it to move, perceiving information and using it to communicate, and reproducing both, with body-waves and ensemble with other systems into larger wholes.

This ternary game also means that systems will evolve towards better energetic planar limbs (wing evolution), better informative, cyclical systems (eyes evolution) or better reproductive systems. And so on the trial and error mutations of evolution 3 sub-species and 3 sub organs will always reign – with higher energy, information and reproductive skills, and each will evolve its topologies towards its perfect ternary form:
55-PLAN-EVOLUTION-1024x728

In the graphs, one of the fundamental advances of general systems science – the understanding of the Universe as generated by the topological evolution of lineal, spatial energy and temporal, cyclical information, the 2 ‘substances’ of which the fractal, organic Universe is made, is its streamlining and completion of evolution, which finally gets its ‘3rd and 4th legs to become a fully understood science’, by adding to the original Evolution of Species (NOT of individuals), and genetics, the needed ‘topological evolution of the 3 canonical forms of mathematics, lineal, planar energy motions (limbs/fields), hyperbolic body-waves and spherical, informative heads/particles that structure all beings of reality.

So we write a simple fractal generator of St systems:we illustrate those general advances with enormous consequences for the understanding of the species of the Universe and how they evolve. As we can see they follow a simple pattern in 3 horizons of increasing informative evolution towards spherical heads on top of high bodies, which perceive better from that advantageous point of view, and how they ensemble in different ternary organs, with local directions to absorb energy and information.

It is this simple ternary structure in space (3 organs in all systems) and time (3 ages of increasing information, young-energy age/horizon, reproductive radiation/mature age, and old, informative age/horizon of individual and species), what we apply to understand the human function and its anthropological evolution

As the Universe constantly assemblies entities with those 3 parts, so all physical systems are made of informative particles, complementary to energetic waves, feeding on an entropic field, and all biological systems have an informative head, on top of an energetic body moving on entropic limbs, this structure is embedded in the most profound level of existence of Universal systems; and as the 3 parts are complementary in an organism, in the organism of History the 3 cultures should have been respectful of each other and complementary.

The ternary, organic, fractal Universe of space-time beings, generates also the 3 races and genders of mankind through the same processes used in complexity to describe the evolution of all scales of the 5th dimension

 

SYSTEMS SCIENCES – TERNARY DIFFERENTIATION OF SPECIES.

 In the graph, the Universe is made of complementary systems of 2 lineal, moving, energy and cyclical, dimensional in/form/ation, from the duality of energetic forces and informative particles, to the biological duality of informative heads. Once the properties of those 2 forms are understood we can apply them to resolve the conundrum of evolution and species differentiation, since the existence of only 2 elements in the Universe, reduces enormously the number of possible new forms and puts limits to the game of evolution.

In the human species those dualities are obvious in the duality male/female, in which men have energetic bodies and females have informative, reproductive ones. Since information is ‘fractal’, formal and inflationary (it constantly reproduces as fractal forms do, self-generating replicant forms in lesser size). So female reproduce the information of our species, and male bodies are energetic, fast-moving, stronger ones.

Yet it seems that such duality is reversed in the brain, to maintain a balance between both species. Women have been proved to have 10 times more white matter, the lineal, network patterns fixed at earlier age in the brain, whose intelligence is ‘stronger’, more difficult to change, less creative and hence the equivalent to an energetic brain, based in ‘beliefs’ and wired deeply with the emotional hyppothalamus, limbic brain. Men on the other hand have 6 times more grey matter, which is creative/destructive, whose patterns are more variable and connected to the external sensorial images.  So we could consider an essential ‘duality’ of complex, fractal systems taken place in the definition of humans: women have energetic, stronger brains and reproductive, informative, weaker bodies. And men have informative, weaker, reproductive brains and energetic, stronger bodies. And both are complementary.

Further on, other patterns of informative evolution took place, as we humans increased the ‘informative dimension of height’ respect to other animals, finally completing the main arrow of complex evolution from energetic shapes (planarian worm) in the dimension of length (energetic dimension) to informative humans (with maximal height dimension).

When we consider the duality of energy and information in races and evolution, the same process determines a clear pattern: species differenciate in one energetic and one informative, and then combine giving birth to mixed species, again differenciated in higher energy/spatial/visual brains and more informative/verbal/temporal ones.

The pattern starts with the differentiation of apes and the first homos, followed in the graph, but truly matters to the creation of the ‘human being’ as it is known today with the apparition of the first verbal/technological species, which seems to be the Homo Floresiensis (technological remains of about 700.000 years found on the same sites, brain morphology similar to that of the homo sapiens, development of the 10th brodman region, etc. 

This again follows the patterns we have found in ‘dual evolution’: during the evolutionary phase of a species, the species develops further information, whose properties are inverse to those of energy, so the species becomes smaller, quiet, isolated in a region of lesser survival struggles, evolving its forms as an insect would do in its chrysallid phase, or men did in the isolated region of Flores islands. There he learned to speak, which again is proved by the fact that almost 1/2 of the languages of the Earth are spoken in those islands (maximal differentiation, memetic or genetic, happens in the original regions in which a universal form appears). Thus the Homo Antecessor should be the Floresiensis, whose discovery validated our 94 Thesis of dual evolution. Then once he came out of Flores advanced north and south, mixing heavily with the Homo Erectus in the Northern region, growing in body mass and giving birth to the speaking Homo Heidelbergensis, antecessor of the visual Neanderthal brain

 While in the southern run towards Africa he further evolved informatively, with minimal mixing with the Erectus, giving birth to the capoid verbal men.

Then  those 2 sub-species, the informative, verbal capoid and the visual-energetic neanderthal interbreed again around 80.000 years ago in Palestine, giving birth to the Homo Sapiens, whose different races show different quantity of ‘neanderthal vs. capoid mixing’.

Evolutionary patterns in complexity sciences. The game of Duality and Creation: energy x information species.

One the main discoveries I did in the field of complexity applied to anthropology, dating back from my first books on the subject (Bio-history, Bio-economics, a theory of Unification, Bookmasters, Ohio, c.94), was the application of the Duality of Energy/information and its self-generative process of creation of new species that combine both essential elements of the Universe, to the evolution of the Human Kind. The plan of evolution of the fractal, organic, Complex Universe is in that sense simple. All species become differentiated in an energetic, ‘lineal’, spatial species and an informative, ‘cyclical’, temporal one. Then both mix to create a more complex, reproductive species.

And so 3 is the number of Horizons and subspecies we find in all evolutionary systems. This plan of evolution which has enormous repercussions in the understanding on how species evolve and complements Darwin and Mendel, however is disputed outside the science of complexity and the congresses in which I have developed my work. And so it is not widely known. And yet it recently achieved new proofs in anthropology with the discovery that the Neanderthal, white, visual, spatial, energetic brain species mixed with the Homo Sapiens, the Capoid, verbal, temporal one.

So we can explain both genre (being women the informative species that reproduces the fractal information of the human being and man the lineal energetic species), and racial differentiation and establish 3 types of mind: the white, visual, dolicocephalic brain, more developed in the visual axis from the forehead to the occipucius, which should be found to have a higher mix of Neanderthal. He is divided in two types, which again experimental proofs have validated: the Semite, in which Neanderthal males mixed with verbal women, as the dominant, stronger species, in the first crossing of the Homo Sapiens, in 80.000 BC. This advanced theory of 94 has now proofs that came in Nature: only homo sapiens women mixed with Neanderthal males in Palestine. The result is the semite with a clear dominant male, bigger than the female, talking species. The reason is that at such time the Homo Sapiens had not developed the arch and so it was dominated by the Neanderthal, stronger warrior. Then in Altai mountains, homo sapiens evolved into the mongoloid cro-magnon which had arcs and hence could kill at distance the neanderthal. This man went down to Europe and the mixing reversed. Now the Homo Sapiens Paletiniensis mixed with the Neaderthal stronger women (the Nordic Women and red hair, dolicocephalic scots). The result was the Aryan in which women are far stronger. This is the last detail of our Complex theory of human evolution to be proved in the next years…

In the text, we have a further explanation of the other races, which are clearly 3: the mongoloid, verbal race with a higher distance in the verbal axis (brachicephalic) and the black, reproductive, emotional brain, which is self-similar to that of women, with a high brain more evolved in the top axis.

complexity defines a simple game of evolution by combining informative and energetic species in balanced, new organisms: e xi=st.

We say that the Universe has 3 arrows of creation, energy, information and its balanced combinations. This is also a sexual principle: Women are information-dominant; male are energy dominant.

In human evolution the same pattern emerges: each successful, dominant Homo differentiates into an energetic and informative species, which recombine, creating more complex= informative and stronger=energetic homos that displace their parental forms, thanks to their higher Energy x Information. Yet the dominant, overall arrow favors informative species. Since when Homos were born, the energy top predators were felines, far stronger than the strongest possible homo mutation. So the evolutionary direction in which the big apes could find an ecological niche within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow. They were already fit to that purpose, since they spent long times living in stillness in the summit of trees, where they had to learn to control complex movement in the informative dimension of height, adding a 3rd dimension to their brain. So they became informative masters among mammal species . . .

Thus, the duality between energy and information is also responsible for the creation of humanity. In the graph we study that process: life first diversified into complementary genders: energetic, lineal, spatial men and cyclical, reproductive women, which hold more biological information. While a 3rd, gay sex mixes both. Further on, as humans evolved, they followed the same pattern of 3 ages proper of all species. Thus, Homos diversified into energetic, informative and reproductive forms that show a higher balance between energy and information. Yet only the informative species, the dominant ‘arrow’ of future survives in each of the 3±1 horizons of increasing informative evolution, from Australopithecus with 500 c.c., into Homo Erectus with 1000 c.c. into Homo Sapiens with 1500 c.c.

And in all those phases, humans split into an energetic species and an informative one that recombined to create a 3rd species. Those species will further evolve technology also in 3 horizons called the upper, middle and lower Paleolithic. Finally, humans diversified in 3 races, specialized in Energy (white race) and information (Mongoloid) with a reproductive, black race, the last to be born, which mixes the pre-mongoloid (bushman) and white races. The constrain established by the fact there are only two elements, energy and information, to create reality, whose lineal and cyclical forms are invariant at scale, in all systems of the cosmos means the Universe imposes the same program of creation to all its species.From an initial ape species we find a ternary differentiation ±5 million years ago, into 3 sub-species of great apes that live in Africa:

—  Max. E: Gorilla, a big, energetic species that reaches 200 kilos, with a square, huge jaw.

—   E=i: The chimpanzee, with a smaller body and a bigger brain. According to the Black Hole law, the smallest organism evolves informatively. Thus, the ‘dwarf chimpanzee’, the PanPaniscus, which today shows the highest learning skills among apes, was the species that seems to have evolved into a 3rd informative horizon of big apes. It is:

—   Max. i: Australopithecus, which splits in 3 evolutionary ages of growing brain volume:

I Horizon: 500 cc.: From Australopithecus to Homo Erectus.

We have dated the oldest mandibles of Australopithecus Anamensis, the top predator of the 3 big ape species, in 4 million years. The Australopithecus, after reproducing massively in the savannah ecosystem that favours his bipedalism, suffers a new ternary mutation. The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus Afarensis that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago, are:

—  Max. E: The Paranthropus, an energetic species with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain. He looks like a heavy-set, humanoid gorilla. He was probably vegetarian. The first subspecies found is the Paranthropus Aethiopicus, which will further evolve into the stronger Paranthropus Robustus.

—  E=i. The Australopithecus Africanus, which maintains the form of the original Australopithecus Afarensis, perhaps with inner improvements in his soft tissue. He lives in South Africa and is contemporary of the Paranthropus. And the . . .

—  Max. i: Australopithecus Garthi. He is the informative species, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the shape of all informative species: a rounded forehead, as the sphere is the formwhich holds more information in lesser space.

Those 3 species live very close. Around the Turkana Lake we have found remains of the 3 Homos. Yet the arrow of future favors informative species. So the top predator Homo will be the Australopithecus Garthi that goes through a mature age of massive reproduction, probably extinguishing the other 2 subspecies and expanding worldwide into new ecological niches that favoured their genetic and memetic adaptation through a new, ternary split:

—  Max. E: A regressing, energetic A. Garthi, similar but taller than its parental Australopithecus.

—  E=i: Homos Habilis and Rudolfensis, with similar brain capacity to the original Garthi.

—  Max. i. Homo Ergaster, an informative ape with a 1000 cc. brain, which doubles the brain capacity of Australopithecus.

II Horizon: 1000 cc. From Homo Erectus to Homo Sapiens..

That Homo Ergaster, after a massive age of reproduction and expansion throughout the planet, subdivides again in 3 sub-races of Homo Erectus.

—  Max.E: Pithecanthropus, the oldest species similar to Homo Ergaster, found in Java.

—  E=i: Homo Erectus proper, found in China, who grows in the informative dimension of height that favors perception from an advantage point of view, to 1.7 m. He has simple technology, a skull without forehead and thick bones that handicap further cranial evolution.

—  Max. Ti: Homo Floresiensis, the smallish species, which according to the Black hole paradox should be the form who gave origin to Sapiens, as the smallish ‘pan paniscus’ evolved the chimp into the Homos. Recently discovered, he is a formal mutation with a smaller body, whose morphology resembles for the first time that of a human being. He has thinner bones that allow further growth and a higher forehead, the location of the creative part of the brain.

Palaeontologists also found the first advanced technological tools in his sites in Flores Island, which is an isolated place, the ideal region to foster further evolution, due to the lack of top predators (alopatric evolution). Thus, he ads now technological energy weapons that substitute body strength and define a single arrow of future for human evolution: information. His improvement in neurological form, probably caused first his rapid expansion thanks to his new technological tools and then a rapid growth in size through the cross-breeding with the taller Homo Erectus species, giving finally birth around 300.000 B.C., to a new energy/ information duality: The energetic, big Neanderthal and the informative Bushman, which will combine again to give birth to the different races. Those predictions based in the 3 arrows of future time and the black hole paradox (information is small and evolves in dwarf species) have been confirmed by genetic maps and Paleontology and await final confirmation, when new skulls of Floresiensis are found.

The 3rdinformative Horizon: Homo Sapiens, 1500 cc.

—  The lineal, energetic, visual Homo Sapiens Neanderthal, with ±1500 cc.

—  And a second informative pygmy strain, the 1st verbal woman, the mitochondrial eve, probably a bushman, also with ±1500 cc.

± 50.000 years ago she crossed into the Middle East, probably mating with earlier Neanderthals, giving origin to the visual, energetic white male (Homo Palestiniensis, whose skulls show mixed traits from both species).

± 35.000 y. ago, in the high Tibetan plains, she became the informative Mongoloid that colonized Asia, America and descended upon Europe and Africa, where she cross-bred with the capoid (bushman) and became the black man, the balanced E=i, reproductive race, completing the final, ternary differentiation of the main races of mankind.

The same ternary structure happens in genders, with the informative female body, of cyclical forms, the energetic male body and the neutral gay/child; and vice versa, the informative male brain dominant in grey matter and the energetic female brain dominant in white matter. So both body and brain are complementary in female and male and in each of them between their brain and body. And that is the just, balanced, complementary structure of the organic Universe.

If humans instead of fighting under ‘metal-ideologies’ that worship weapons (nationalism) money (capitalism) and machines (techno-utopia, mechanism) more than man, he had chosen the ‘right culture’, of social love in any of its evolving versions (christianity, Buddhism, Islam, Socialism, Ecologism), and created a superorganism, Gaia, in which he acted as the collective brain of the planet, fostering a sustainable world dominated by life-based, human goods, we would have indeed survived.

For many decades, since Darwin talked about Darwinian Struggle, biologists thought that was the only strategy of survival. Yet recently we have realized social evolution is a far more evolved, efficient tool of survival, which accounts for the superiority of “herds” of weaker individuals, such as wild dogs which hunt better than lions, or “verbal humans” which probably extinguished non-verbal Neanderthals. Or not so quite…

Since when we apply those laws of system sciences to humans, we obtain a surprising result recently proved by genetics – that there should be both an specialized human, informative race which easily evolves into social systems (the verbal human) and another specialized energetic human race, which not so easy evolves into a social super-organism, the white man:

Cultural races.


The ternary principle that defines in complexity the most common patterns of evolution apply also to the 3 types of human minds, or memetic cultures which define the origins of history.

Further on, as racial tribes evolved socially and emerged into cultural societies, which are super-organisms of history, the ternary, racial division of mankind between energetic white men, informative Mongoloid and vitalist blacks, will become the cultural differentiation of human beings in 3 type of brain orientations, and hence cultures orf the mind according to the 3 elements of all systems, energy, information and its reproductive combination; reflected in 3 types of brain morphology:

— ‘Visual, energetic, lineal, spatial cultures’, proper of the white man, with his concepts of lineal time and his passion for technological, energetic weapons. It is the dolicocephalic brain dominated by the visual, eye to occipucius axis, also dominant in neanderthals

—    ‘Cyclical, informative, mongoloid cultures’, natural to Asian civilizations, with cyclical concepts of time. It is the brachicephalic, wide, verbal brain; dominant in the ear axis; hence giving birth to female, eusocial cultures like the Chinese.

—    And ‘sensory, reproductive, colored cultures’, which in Africa and India developed human senses to their limits. It is dominannt in the height/medular axis with a ‘tall head’, peaking in the top/motor and sensorial area.

Which culture is better for the survival of mankind? Since survival is the goal of all species, reached in the age of balance, E=i, we should promote, paradoxically, the culture that our technological civilization discriminates: the black, reproductive, sensory culture . . .

Thus, the Laws of Evolution and its 3±1 ages and subspecies, map out the main species of Homo, till arriving to 2 Homo Sapiens, the spatial, visual=longer, dolicocephalic, energetic brain of the Neanderthal, which seems to have lived in Europe and left some of his traits in the Homo Palestiniensis, on the slow-crossing border of Canaan. Further cross-breeding of the Palestiniensis with the Sapiens is the likely origin of the white man (white skin, red hair, Rh-?, consonantal languages, wide hips, prominent nose)

While the informative Homo Sapiens Sapiens, the verbal=wider brachicephalic brain, which started as a small ‘San pygmy’, evolved into the self-similar mongoloid race. Finally, the black race, with tall brains are the sensorial culture,  the reproductive species, the last one to appear, shows the maximal genetic mixture.

In the same manner, we talk also of gender duality in terms of an energetic species, the lineal male of big muscles, spatial size and visual brain; and the woman, the informative, reproductive species, who would understand the cycles of birth of plants and evolve mankind from the energetic, hunting Paleolithic into the Neolithic, the mature age of History, with its understanding of the arrow of reproduction of the Universe (cult to the goddesses) and its harmonic cults to Nature.

The Neanderthal Sapiens though had a literalist verbal mind, because their eyes completely dominated and so space not time matter, the obvious not the logic and complex, the emotion and immediate desire of the eye, not the social love created by verbal interaction. Today again this 20 year old thesis of my work in complexity has been validated – the Neanderthal had much bigger eyes than us.

They were materialistic, anthropomorphic, self-centered people whose Gods were no longer the organic principles of the Universe, but ‘human figures’ made of fetish metal.

Anthropomorphism indeed is an essential feature of the Germanic-Jewish cultures since they feel Goths, or sons of God, entitled to rule over all other humans and animal forms of Nature.

At the same time, myth and idealism is natural to both cultures to sustain those dreams. So action and ritual is confused with being. From the rituals of gold ex-votes to Aryan fire rituals to modern Heiddegger’s Dasein concept (‘Being and time’) to evilwood fantasies and actors, those who enact a metaphor of reality believe they become that reality.

‘Wiesen, Veda’ meant to become God by representing a ritual of God’s creation.  The Levi priest that sacrificed the son of his other ’11 slave tribes’ that brought him gold ex-votes to the temple was becoming Yvwh in those self-pumping ego rituals. So did the Arya priest.  Idealism was born, and it is still the main feature of their intellectual, detached cultures, with its prizes and experts that know nothing but enact their beliefs as if they were truth, with Nobel Prizes, Holocaust remembrances, Oscars and Marketing of their very low quality mind products as fruits of their genius and ‘ingenuity’ (-;

They couldn’t understand the memes of eusocial love. They were called eviL=anti-life by the fertility priests of Goddesses, who they named ‘the abomination’ (Hebrew Bible). They couldn’t understand the organic Universe. Their Gods were Thor, a sword in which they impaled children of their enemies, or Baal, a gold statute, to whom they sacrificed their own children in ‘Hecatombs’. They believed in ritualistic religions and sado-masochistic actions that repressed systematically their life wantings; and in purity and separation from the inferior castes that enjoyed life  (Hindi religions, Jewish dietary laws).

They maimed their human nature (prohibition laws against eusocial love/segregatiosnism, good food also with dietary segragationism, sex=human reproduction and verbal thought – despised by mathematical Kabalas and mathematical wars)  to harden their spirit and brutalize mankind, In this manner they started the death of Gaia that now their descendants, bankers and military people worshiping money and weapons and opressed the democratic, love-based human cultures they controlled.

But once and again we shall find the fundamental antiscientific trait of their ilogic, emotional mind: TO DENY CAUSALITY, INVERTING IT, in this case ‘Jewish victimism’ is based in the concept that Mankind segregates them and it is racist against them; when Judaism is the essential segregationist culture, and of course, once they segregate and price mankind to WHOM THEY ONLY RELATE THROUGH MONEY, in the past through slavery now part-time salary slavery and always through debt money, Mankind acts-reacts in the same fashion. As we observed already in classic economists, where Mr. Friedman affirms that data does not matter and assumptions are the origin of economics, to whom Samuelson rightly replied that with such procedures assumptions and conclusions cannot be differentiated and their order can be juggled at will.

In any case we shall not talk of the germans as much as we talk of the Jewish because we know them. This is not so much censored in scholar history and mass-media. We keep talking of the censored part of the Financial-Media/Military-industrial system, the FINANCIAL-MEDIA, the head of the metal-earth, the informative machines and those who own them. And because the body, the military-industrial complex, ultimately obeys the head, the financial-media system, which is truly the responsible element of the system.
That is why after 3000 years of a combined Jewish-Germanic civilization most people are called Joseph and John and Mary, not Brunewilda. And that is why we worship Yaveh, not Thor. And we see evilwood films not UFA films. And we mourn the victims of the Financial-Media master race, not those of the German military-industrial complex (as both had around 5 million innocent scapegoats of the elites dying in the war, mostly women and children… some gased in small rooms some in the open air as ball of fire borke in germa n cities from Hamburg to Dresden during our carpet bombings. Only the fact that victors write history and the international banker won over the german military explains why some are victims and the other forgotten.
But both are the same and for most times of history they worked together to annihilate the real victim, mankind and its civilizations of life goods and eusocial love.

What is happening today, after they have destroyed the American superorganism based in the equality and human rights of its founding enlightened fathers is just a global bid of the german-Jewish American subcivilization to annihilate mankind terraforming this planet in a robotic nightmare of vigilante drones and white collar pcs and blue collar robots with humans taxed to death.

And what has changed also is that due to the complexity and overdrive of negative information and the occultation of their history with all kind of censorships it is the fact  that they have rewritten the subconscious collective to make us belief they are righteous, hard working people, experts that will guide mankind to paradise. So Germany is the most admired country in the world and the jewish are the victims of history…

Races in complex science: the 3 types of minds: Emotional, visual and verbal brains.

The previous graph shows the sciences of systems/complexity/duality, applied to the evolution of man.

The basic tenant of those science is that the Universe is a game of complementary systems of energy and information in all its scales (fields of energy and particles of information in physics – complementarity principle of quantum theory), bodies of energy and minds of information in biology, energetic and informative machines that enhance our equivalent organs in economics and so on.

When we apply this new discoveries of system sciences to the study of evolution it restricts enormously the possible future forms of biological evolution, and since energy has a lineal/planar morphology (fastest distance and highest surface between two spatial points) and information a cyclical/spherical morphology (the sphere is the form that stores more information in lesser space), it has an enormous power to resolve the pending questions of the process of biological evolution this planet constantly suffers. In the graph, we consider its application to the evolution of humanity, as I explained in the conferences on biology and duality at the International Systems Society.

In essence in a Universe of two substances, bodies of energy that move heads of information evolution will try to maximize those parameters. So we can easily introduce a definition for a top predator species: Max. E x Max. I, which mathematically maximizes when e=i (so 5×5>9×1). This means evolution and survival favors 3 type of species, those with maximal information/better heads, those with maximal energy/better bodies, and those balanced between both parameters. And this very simple scheme allows to classify and explain the whys of the evolutionary, fractal tree of life, which genetics and survival darwinism explain in the hows. Thus Complexity in all its branches is poised to become the ‘3rd leg’ of biology in this century.

In essence species evolve in a dual, complementary Universe of systems of entropy and information, mixed in energetic/body power, their informative/head power or the networks that reproduce and combine both systems, exi, the reproductive networks. We talk of 3 dominant wills or biological drives that increase the survival chances of a system.

For that reason there are genders (where the male is the energetic species, and the female the reproductive, informative one). And since energy is lineal (being the line the fastest distance between two points) and information is cyclical (being the sphere the form that stores more information in lesser space), it follows that men have big, lineal, spatial bodies and test better in geometrical analysis and women have cyclical, smaller, rounded forms and test better in verbal, informative tasks. Yet there is always a 3rd mixed variation, in the case of gender, the gay sex.

Those findings which I exposed in my papers on topological evolution within the scientific community of systems and complex scientists, can be applied also to the will and drives of the mind. There are people who psychologists define as picnic, nervous, tall (height is the dimension of information); the are athletic, sanguineous people, dominant by their energetic will; and there are viscerotonic people, driven by their ‘lower passions’ (-;

We can therefore use, as we have done in studies of evolution of all type of species, the existence of a constant diversification in 3 different species to analyze as we do in the previous graph, the evolution of mankind from the initial triad of apes, the energetic gorilla, the reproductive chimp and the informative australopithecus, till the last differentiation of homos, between the energetic, visual neanderthal mind, today dominant in the white man, and the smaller, informative, verbal, homo sapiens, today dominant in the informative mongoloid, with the reproductive, emotional black race in the middle.

Then, once evolution produces 3 types, it combines them, and so as the tree becomes more complex, yet always reduced to those combinations, natural selection will ‘prune’ the tree of life of its less efficient species. In this manner the reader can see all the main homo species from the ape to man, and how they perfectly fit in the morphological triad of alopatric diversifications known in the fossile register.

Now, if we jump that phase we come to the last ternary group of surviving homos, the neanderthal, sapiens and its combination the homo sapiens palestiniensis which properly should be known as homo sapiens neanderthaliensis. Its existence forecasted 2 decades ago in my first spanish books on duality has now be proved by the genetic record. 10% of genes differentiate homo and neanderthal and 4% of those are neanderthal, so the white man is essentially a mixed species.

The existence of 3 dominant human races today, the white, yellow and black people, cannot be argued, but they must be interpreted as 3 types of complementary intelligence, based in our recent discoveries on the science of Complexity, which always favors a ternary process of creation, with an energetic, informative and reproductive ‘decoupling’ along the 3 morphological dimensions or ”axis’ of any space-time form. In the case of the brain, there are 3 axis, the long visual axis, the tall emotional axis and the wide, verbal axis, and so we talk of 3 mental races:

–  The dolichocephalic brain, which overdeveloped visual axis, from the eye to the occipucio. It is the white man.

– The brachiocephalic brain with an overdeveloped verbal axis from ear to ear. It is the mongoloid race.

– The makrocephalic brain, with an overdeveloped emotional axis, from neck to top of the head. It is the black race.

And so we talk in system sciences of 3 types of minds/heads, which emphasize 3 kind of wills in human beings:

– Max. Entropy-motion: Visual, spatial, violent minds; dominant in visual information. This is the case of the child and the ’male’ species, of the white race and in the earlier anthropological record, the Neanderthal, which we already considered as Cohn did, to be co-father of the white man, the Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, as this month, Nature has proved genetically.

Those ‘white people’ who occupy the same range than neanderthals are easily recognized by their dolicocephalic head and occipital bulk, their eye=I oriented mind, individualistic ego and energetic behavior. Languages are consonantal, with little vowels, red hair, rh- and other neanderthal traits further allow to recognize the basque/iberian/Germanic and Semitic cultures as the dominant paradigm of the visual culture. In economics, it gives birth to the gold fever of those cultures, which the other types of human mind hardly had.

The dolicocephalic Neanderthal with minimal development on the parietal regions of speech, mixed with the verbal homo sapiens gave birth to the Homo Sapiens Palestiniensis, which should be properly called Homo Sapiens neanderthaliensis, dominant in visual information, and the ‘length’ axis of the brain back (Neanderthal) and then forwards (rational, Aristotelian thought handled by the frontal region of the brain added by the Homo Sapiens)

– Max. I: Verbal, informative minds, dominant in temporal, verbal information. This is the case of the old people oor the ‘female’species, of the yellow race and in the earlier record, the capoid, Homo Sapiens Sapiens, smaller in spatial body, with the dominant brachicephalic brain, and wide face, as the dominant language goes across from ear to ear and Brocca brain region. The informative species is social, group oriented, as it uses the verbal language to create super-organisms of history. Their language has an excess of vowel; women play a greater role…

The mongoloid race and the female gender are dominant in the verbal, wide axis. Hence the distance between the eyes and the parietal is larger and the eyes are wider.

-Exi: Finally a 3rd type of culture, whose informative minds are dominated by emotional sensorial, body oriented, reproductive drives, is the black culture and the young human. Its brain is taller, with the top point in the upper head, as the dominant direction comes from the spinal-hypothalamus axis upwards:

In the graph, the regions most developed in the emotional races, along the ‘height’ axis, are the inner regions of emotional thought, and the motor and sensorial cortex. This long hypothesis, extracted from the models of complexity and duality developed by this writer in the 90s have now increasing evidence: women are wired inwards towards the Hypothalamus, and black and female ‘races/genres’ show higher development of the emotional brain and excel in tasks related to the body/senses.

Those distinctions were already observed in XIX century studies on brain morphology and cultural psychology. They are real, increasingly proved by a wide number of research papers that go from the analysis of why men draw better maps and women talk more to genetic studies in linguistics and bio-chemistry that validate our 20 year old research in those fields. Racism consists in thinking that a visual brain is better than an emotional brain or a verbal brain.

In that regard, the difference between XIX century brain studies and modern complexity is the realization that it is not the ‘white entropic’ culture the most evolved, but according to the Laws of complexity, which favor the balance between energy and information in all systems (‘mens sana in corpore sanum’ in human living systems) , if we were to choose one of those 3 mental axis, we should choose the balanced, E=i, reproductive, emotional cultures (women, black people) for the same reason the best age of life is the mature age of balance – since it is the balanced culture that would ensure the survival of man, while the extreme energetic/warrior white mind and informative/computerized mind-culture of Europe and Asia are taking out of balance the planet Earth with its obsession for ‘superior’ technological machine/memes.

 

HUMIND LANGUAGES

When we study human languages then we can easily find the specialised languages of the mind that cater to each of those points of view and in fact differentiate the main cultures of humanity,  with its ‘extreme’ and balanced world views:

The 3 mind races are dominant in one of the 3 axis of languages, visual, entropic, lineal white neanderthal, mongoloid, verbal temporal, and emotional, sensorial psylocephalic black races. They determine in turn its cultural worldview: lineal time and animetal violence in white men, cyclical time and organic information in Asians and worship of life, Gaia Nature, physical, emotional and reproductive memes in black people

The graph analysed in many other posts in detail give us the following ‘natural’ classification of human languages of perception:

Entropic, spatial visual languages (realist art, white cultures) < Reproductive sensorial languages (music, emotional art): Black cultures > Verbal, cyclical time philosophies, organic languages (mongoloid cultures).

So of the languages of humanity, there are those that meet the I<Eye, mainly spatial art, in which the white people excel. There are those who deal with the cyclical organic S≈T balanced nature of the Universe, notably legal non fiction use of words, philosophy of science, homologic poetry and mathematics, in which the Asian reached its height. And there are more sensorial emotional arts, expressionist painting, music; life arts in which the Black cultures excel.

In this post which i have copy-pasted from a 25 year old book (so it will be out of style and tone, but I can’t really work much these days and so I leave it for posterity)… we shall study… (widened in smaller posts)… the subconscious collective mind of civilisations, verbal ethics, visual art, and emotional languages…

HUMIND LANGUAGES

It might sound absurd certainly not stientific to call the highest of all stiences, humanities, in a world ruled by ‘mechanisms’ .

And yet it is appropriate to make this statement, regarding the stiences specific of the human mind, which translate to subjective human thought, which makes of man the measure of all things, the objective larger stiences of time and space (logic and mathematics) of the universe. Other words I use is human mind, and humind (likely the one to state) to specify the differences between objective languages, generated as mirrors of the Universe by any monad, and the specific languages, arts of visual thought, ethics of verbal temporal thought, proper of the human discourse. We shall therefore include here what has been usually called ‘humanities’.

Arts – all together, and literature, ethics and religion in the voice of its prophets (below religion as an ∆+1 super organism of history) are thus the round-about final category of stience as perceived by the human observer, which closes the cycle connection the generator minds-monads of the  Universe with the specific human generator-mind.

œth isomorphism: Self:  O-Point x ∞ World = Constant mind Mapping.

ethicsandaesthetics

The i+1 scale of Humanity has also a ‘Mind’, which is the collective mind of all its ‘neuronal, informative, verbal=temporal and visual=spatial  artists’, which see space and time with human senses. Thus the collective i+1 mind are the traditional sciences of ethics and aesthetics.

As such Human aesthetics correspond to human visual, space proportions, human ethics to the laws of social love, which translate to the Wor(l)d languages the biological laws of Eusocial evolution that define the survival of species, in this case the species=human super organism, of which all humans are its relative cells:

3. reducedThe Wave of History art-ageshort

In the graph the human i-scale, its ‘collective mind’, art & literature, the collective visual=spatial and temporal=verbal perception and its ‘time dimensions’, the 3 ages of art or ‘styles’ of a civilisation, between its birth and extinction.

We can departing from that general mind study each civilisation and all its art forms, which will correspond to ‘varieties’ of the ‘canonical’ human Superorganism.

Art the informative mind of the civilizations. The canon of ethics and aestehtics

Thus we have defined human art, as the visual and verbal perception olf space and time by the human ind, it fllows that collectiv e art was also visual and verbal art, of colletive nature. And that collective nature imposed upon social art, two socila concepts: ethics and aesthetics of human nature. So classic art always had two basic forms, social ethic art, and individual aesthetic art, and two canons, moral, and beauty, carried by the word, and the eye of the human artist.

Today, even artists find those ideals, something of the past, because the artist today is not the valuator of reality, and has no ethic role. He does not educate the rest of the cells of society. So sacred art, religious art (which tried to create a social, harmonic morality among the different cells of society), even legal thought, has declined. Of course this has given individual Freedom to artists, to reflect their individual personality since nobody cares really anymore for what we, the artists, neurons of humanity, have to say.

Yet for most of history, Art has been a social phenomena, since men, lived in a social organism. The artist lived within a society. His ideas were similar to those of other artists of that society, fruit of customs and learning processes within that society. And so, the information that the mental cells of a civilization developed (the artistic information of a culture) was similar in most of the artists of a civilization. Styles in art gathered those similar mind-wor[l]ds, coming from people living in the same place, at the same time, as neurons work in the same manner, in the same organisms.

Individual art, the genius… and its relationship with social art

The style of an artist, is the peculiar way in which the mind of the artist, transforms the biological “Wor[l]d” of perception, that all humans have in common; the sounds and image we perceive as the Universe. While most people see reality under those biological limits, the artist goes beyond the subjective eye-Wor[l]d of the human species, and adds certain personal subjective changes to those images and words. This is the artist’s style.

The artist with his style goes beyond the “common way of perceiving reality”, and shows those other possible Worlds, that maybe some other species in some far away planet perceive directly (imagine a world where eyes see with the colors of a fauvist painter).

Still in the Earth, men see reality in a certain manner, and only artists are able to break with those conventions of the mind. Such individual artists are rightly called genius, since they create an entire new way of perception. When such new way of perception is meaningful, and harmonic, and can be understood at least partially by the audience, we have found an original artist.

Yet, in as much as men belong to social organisms, where they communicate in-form-ation to other human “cells” of the social organism, even individual genius, and its perception of reality, reproduces into works of art, that transmit the information to other “neurons” of the social organisms. In this manner, styles are transmitted, and create “schools” of art where many similar artist display the same style.

If the individual artist expresses its mind experience through its personal art, we can say that the society expresses its collective mind experience through schools of art.

If individual art is the evolution of the mental senses of the artist towards regions never explored by the common human mind, the style-art is the evolution of the collective mind of civilizations. It reflects the social mental state, of such civilization (as individual art reflects the mental state of the individual artist). In that sense, art becomes the collective mind of a civilization.

It is then clear that in classic history the role of artists was indeed sacred, fundamental, because verbal and visual artists, were in charge of recreating a Wor[l]d pleasant to man, where human social cells were in harmony, and shared as cells in any organism do, their vital information and energy. Ethic priests ruled the verbal minds of people with messages of love and ethics. Artists created beautiful environments, well constructed cities. Energy workers (farmers) fed the cells of the organisms. Literature educated the feelings of people, allowing bondage among individuals, at several levels (love, family, citizenship, religion). There was therefore a clear idea of what a social nation was, and what artists had to do in such society. That is why artists tried to find “canons” of beauty, that people would imitate, as role models.

The canons in classic art. What are ethics and aesthetics?

We can now understand the concept of a canon, both in verbal art (canon of ethics) and in visual art (canon of beauty). Today in individual art, when art is no longer the mind of civilizations, but science is, canons do not matter, but in the past, when art guided cultures, and took care of its survival and welfare, it was necessary and fundamental.

There was a canon of beauty in space, that had as element of reference the human form. Since we are humans, and we were top predators of the Earth, as all top predators do, we designed a Wor[l]d to our image and resemblance. So spatial arts, had as canon of beauty the proportions of human beings, and in its most beautiful creations (Greek, Italian art), that canon was respected, to create an environment in which man felt happy, in harmony with his surroundings, and dedicated to the pursuit of sensorial pleasure. This is the case of Greek and Renaissance sculpture and architecture.

There was also a canon of beauty in time, defined by the biological language of measure of time, that mankind uses: verbal thought.

How can we define beauty on time? It is self-evident, that if you ask anyone, what he would want to happen in time, he would say, “I want to survive”. So survival is indeed, the canon of beauty in time. And survival has in social thought a name: Ethics. Ethic societies that promote peace, and abhor war, do not die away. Societies that create systematically weapons end in civil wars, or in national wars. Thus, the people that were considered great artists of verbal thought in the past, were the prophets and writers that praised peace, and with poetic parables, preached the well being and harmony among human beings. Philosophy and religion were considered the highest forms of verbal thought. This, as we said no longer holds, since we are no longer ruled by words, but by numbers, by men, but by machines and prices. But we cannot ignore the fact that ethics and religious thought have controlled mankind. And the great artists of the word have been those prophets such as Jesus and Buddha, that talked against weapons and money, and praised love, and human senses. The artist is indeed the prophet, not the church, or the latter commentator. The master of the Word is Jesus, that defends a prostitute, and foresees that those “who kill by the sword, will die by the sword”, not the Catholic Church or Luther, and Calvin that acceptmoney and war, and repress sensorial love.

The quality of verbal art

As a consequence of the biological nature of languages, we cannot regard any longer verbal art, as a product, or a secondary commodity. “Literature for the sake of aesthetics; art for the sake of art” is far less relevant than “sacred art”, literature with an educational mission, either social literature and philosophy, or sensorial literature (fiction), which educates the senses and feelings of the people. There are qualities in the forms of literature, because literature has a function. Literature is not useless entertainment. Verbal Art is the biological language of mankind, and our societies. Its function is to mirror reality and explain the universe to man, from our own point of view, with the aim of helping human societies to survive. This means that we can qualify the quality of literature, according to such function.

It will be good literature, either legal, religious, fiction or logic literary art, a verbal construction that through its reading and practice, improves the capacity of an individual to behave ethically and in harmony with the other members of his society. It will be bad art, those literary and verbal forms that harm the harmony of societies.

So “War and Peace” is good art. So it is the “bill of rights” or the “Gospel”. They try to give the reader an “ethic sense of life” that favors peace over war; human rights over the rights of machines; and love and poverty, and despise for money and war, (the message of the gospel). Since history proves that those attitudes are positive for the survival of the individuals of society. On the other hand bad verbal art, is that art, which harms the energy and information of civilizations, pushing individuals against each other.

A typical script made in Hollywood that makes an apology of violence and murder is bad verbal art, regardless of its technological achievements. Its consequence is to multiply the use of weapons in our society, of technological species, that harm mankind.

The decalogue scripts of Polish director K. Kieslowski, are master pieces of filmed literature, despite its minimal technology because they make us reflect on the basic matters of love and life and death, far more important than the designed special effects of digital computers. A fascist law is also bad art. A religion which does not accept the equality of all men, a tribal religion of “chosen of God”, is also bad ethic verbal art. Since it allows war between tribes. Those facts are self-evident to any human being that thinks naturally about the purpose of art and verbal thought. They might collide with the “economic view”, that favors all forms of literature, specially those forms of literature, that multiply the use of machines, even weapons (economic and military nationalism, advertising, etc.)… according to the old lemma “you will defend me with your sword, and I will defend you with my word”.

Such art is considered here “rhetoric art”, bad literature, since its purpose is the opposite to the biological function of verbal thought. However in present societies most verbal art is rhetoric art, art that has neither a moral, ethic standing, or even any relationship with the reality of man as an individual or member of a human society. Why is that? Because words are no longer the language of information and power of our societies, a role that today belongs to money.

As a consequence, verbal thought is no longer the language of power, the sacred language, and it has no longer the role of guiding the survival of mankind. For that reason words enter in decadence, and loose “logic, realistic power”, becoming “fiction”, a language used to describe false realities. The value of things now is given by its price, not by its verbal meaning. And so mathematics describes reality, while words are used to describe fictions, and those realities of lesser power, such as the individual lives – no longer the social lives of people… Literature is now too often fiction, or science, or shallow I-literature, ego-trips and bio-pics of little relevance, or books on secondary senses and products (from gastronomy, to do-it-yourself manuals). Sacred literature has almost died away…

The function of visual art

What was the social role on that sacred view, of visual art? If we have considered verbal art, to be in charge of the temporal perception of a civilization, visual art, obviously will be in charge of the visual perception of such culture. Visual art therefore has also a human canon, an aesthetic, spatial canon, referred to the relative dimensions of man. If verbal art has to create temporal harmony among individuals, visual art has to create spatial harmony, beauty, in the space of that civilization.

Such is the classic vision of architecture and sculpture, urbanism and painting, even gardening, or agricultural development. All those arts that transform the space around us tried to create a harmonic environment in societies. And when both canons succeeded, we talk of a harmonic civilization in which ethics and aesthetics (the moral of the eye), favor a Wor[l]d built to the image and resemblance of mankind.

The function of art, is to shape the environment of man in a pleasant way. Yet since all measure in space and time is relative (Theory of Relativity), a pleasant space for man has the references of human size and form. To make of man the center of creation, the God of the Earth. This was understood perfectly by the theoretical minds of Renaissance, the last human culture, previous to the Industrial Revolution. The aim of renascence artists was to create ethics and aesthetics, for the Italian society. They worked hand in hand with the church in charge of the ethics of Christian societies. They tried to create “canons” of beauty as the gospel tried to create canons of ethics. They affirmed that men should try to achieve a mind and a body according to such canons. The artist, as the most complex mind of society, was the guide of the individual, which tried to achieve personal perfection as a human being, imitating those ethic and aesthetic roles, the artists showed him.

The destruction of the Renaissance caused by the evolution of gunpowder weapons, the creation of religions that worshipped money instead of words as the language of information of human societies (Calvinism, Anglicanism), and the beginning of science with its despise for human words and human eyes, meant the collapse of the artist as the guide of human societies.

The human paradise as the goal of history also was lost. A new culture, and a new civilization appeared, where the goal of history became the progress of the machine, and the human goal, the paradise of human senses, where “man is the measure of all things” was forgotten.

We are living the consequences of such mistake, in a world in which man no longer matters, where humans and words are submissive to mathematics and machines…

Yet only the best human minds, verbal priests, and social activists that follow the original ideas of his wor[l]d-masters, sensorial artists, that do not renounce to explore fully the human nature, and rebels of thought that do not accept the brain-washing of scientific myths, and market-propaganda, realize of the errors of our society.

The myth of superman

All this bring us to a final reflection on the nature of the Human Masters, the great artists of verbal and visual wor[l]ds that have confronted throughout History, the metal masters, warriors, traders and scientists that base their power, not in their own senses and biological nature, but in the power of energy-metal (lines of metal or weapons from swords to missiles, cycles of metal, ormoney, and metal-minds or scientific instruments).

Human Masters who “think more and see more”, are the true masters of mankind. Since mankind is a mental race -its body is not even the strongest of all carbolife species- and the master artist is the most developed human mental race, it is the artist, the “super-man”, not the warrior, or the scientist, that rely on weapons and metal-minds, to power up their bodies and minds. This was the vision of the Greek philosophers, and it is the biological truth. Hence, human masters, masters of the wor[l]d should rule human societies, as Plato wisely understood. They do not rule our societies, because warriors, traders and scientists, impose their power with the help of their metal and as a consequence, they also corrupt art, which becomes another ‘informative’ myth, used to glorify animetal castes in power.

The style of an artist, and the style of a society.

The present earth is changing from a historic ecosystem of human social organisms based in human beings, human goods, and human art into a single ecosystem ruled by metal organisms, networks, and financial systems, that we might call the metal-earth.

The main effect of that change is the increasing obsolescence of human art and human minds, submissive today to the industrial design of software for thinking machines.

However in the past, in the ecosystems-organisms of history that we have called nations and civilizations, words, legal systems and art were far more important, because they were theinformative networks of societies. Verbal and visual knowledge and Art were the mind of civilizations as historic organisms, organized by legal information, and religion.

And so art, as the social networks of information of civilizations, was not so much an individual phenomena, but a collective phenomena. And the artist felt himself with a social role, as the neuronal cells, the informative organs of his society. It was for that reason the art of any artist was basically similar, to the art of all other artists of its society. It was “style-art”, because the style, was the collective message of a civilization. Today however, because civilizations are no longer ruled by human minds, but by networks of financial information, by company-mothers and itslobbies, by networks of metal-minds that produce information in industrial processes, the artist no longer has a social role of relevance. So he is free of any collective style. The style that controls ideas of artists, exists however in radios, televisions, internets, and all other forms of industrial information. A style which is controlled, and tailored to produce the basic message of industrial societies: men have as only purpose to work=reproduce machines, and test=consume them. Of course this message is presented with al the rhetoric of beauty, and freedom necessary to hide the fact, that work and consume are not acts that necessarily develop and increase the human sensorial Freedom, but basically evolve and multiply machines. Yet the message has reached so much sophistication, that most human beings today, believe that to be a worker and a consumer is the paramount Freedom of mankind; while to evolve human senses, and enjoy Human Goods, and the pleasures of human existence   is either a “sin”, an act of “laziness”, and “weakness” and a “lost of time”. The fact is that all top predators in the Universe, exist to be lazy, lions of the savanna, enjoying the basic pleasures of his organism, to reproduce (sex-love), to feed energy [food, movement], and to receive its natural information (verbal thought and visual beauty in the human case). That is, the ideals of society before the industrial revolution – the ideals of Renaissance, and the aristocracy, top predator caste of that age. And vice versa, and ideal world dedicated to the freedoms of machines, will imply that men-slaves of machines would dedicate their time to the reproduction of machines (work) its evolution (industrial research) and its vitalization as species in movement (consume of machines that vitalize their existence).

So it is evident that the Freedom of the market, the Freedom of the economy, is the Freedom of machines and its company-mothers. While the biological Freedom of the citizen, of the human being, were the ideals expressed by the art styles  of historic civilizations. Those facts have of course enormous historic relevance, and explain why under such brain-washing propaganda, the classic historic, social, religious art and his aesthetic and ethic ideas, clash so deeply with modern ideologies of economical men and yet they were accepted and enjoyed by the citizens of Historic civilizations. They found in the social ideas of religious art, and the sensorial ideals of individual art, the pursuit of their self-realization as individual, biological human beings, and as part of a macro-social organism, a culture, or civilization, that social art harmonized, as nervous messages harmonize social cells in a body.

In all those cultures art was sacred, art was considered the informative network of the Historic organism. Art caused the evolution of the collective human mind. Art was the mind of civilizations, and acted in the social historic organism, as the nervous networks act in the human organism.

complex version: hierarchical i-scales

38 GO(L)D VALUES
3agesofscience_image004

The Whole and collective self of mankind is the Wor(l)d, we make to our image and likeness, with a will carried by the collective verbal language of the human kind, the word.

In the graph, languages value species according to their substance affinity. So ethic words give maximal value to human life, since human brains reproduce them.  While money was first made of metal, (coins) and gave maximal value to metal weapons. Then it was a paper and e-money representing a corporation (stocks) and so it gives companies enormous values. So Apple is worth more than all the inhabitants of Pakistan.

Only currency, representing nations carries human values and can be used to reproduce a world to our image and likeness, spent by governments in the creation of salaries and welfare goods.  Thus the issue of money is NOT so much how to  issue it, but its values and the power it gives to those who invent it; since it defines who rule societies.

The problem of monetary values as the graph shows is the fact that in its metallic forms, it values more corporations, machines and weapons, metal-memes than any other object, including human beings, who in fact as all forms of life have null values in terms of metallic money.

Thus a society based in the values of metal-money either gold or corporative money, fosters the overproduction cycles of machines and weapons that cause wars and the extinction of life; showing the biological, predatory nature of selfish metal memes, which act as genes do, catalyzing the reproduction of a larger super-organism – the Financial-Media/Military-Industrial system that is terraforming the Earth from a planet of life into a planet made to the image of machines and weapons, the most expensive top predator metal-species that kills man.

The problem with the values of money rises from its traditional hypnotic substance (precious metal, today e-cycles in ‘metal-minds’, computers). Go(l)d, a fetish form of money that hypnotizes the mind, and became the fetish of Cananean societies in the desert lands between the fertile crescent humanist civilizations of Sumer and Egypt – origin of the biblical gold religions – is a metal-language and so values more metal than life.

Consider instead a system, which is efficiently, designed economically from the Human/Historic perspective, in which as all mammal, evolved organisms do, the legal/verbal/nervous natural language of man that puts human subject first:

Man=subject<verb=action<object=energy…

…rule the world. We would live a WHealthy world, where history would be the future, machines controlled by men, usurers out of power and humanity would thrive.

THUS ∆+1 ETHICS IS THE LANGUAGE OF THE WOR(L)D AND ITS SCIENCE, BOTH in its religious version (social love religions) and its human one (free, democratic, equalitarian, humanist cultures)

1. Languages command reality. A biological analysis of minds.

 

The Organic structure of Systems.

Among the most advanced biological sciences, there is a new discipline called Theory of Organisms.

It aims to describe any system of the Universe as an organic ecosystem, made of similar cellular elements, ruled by networks of energy and information.

Imagine a robotic machine or a human being.

We can describe both as an accumulation of cellular elements – metal atoms in the robot, carbolife cells in the human being – ruled by two systems of information and energy – electronic information and electric energy in the machine, ionic information and carbolife energy in human beings.

Both can be described as organisms.

Of those three elements of organisms, the cellular species, and the networks of energy and information, we are interested in this book in the networks of information of the species.

Languages and informative networks control systems.

Since contrary to what earlier theories of Evolution thought, the information systems of machines are in control of the energy systems and command reality determining thefuture survival of species in greater measure.

What we might call the paradox of Goliath is clear: Languages control energy forms. Social languages control individuals. So both in biological evolution and historical evolution languages become determinant to know the future and survival of species.

 

The dual components of information systems: software and hardware

Those networks turn out to have systematically a hardware, a cellular support of specialized elements, and a software, a flow of information that moves through that hardware.

The software are the languages of the species.

The hardware are the brain of the species.

In our example both species, the robot and the human being, have languages of information, that flow over a hardware-brain – digital languages flowing over silicon chips in the robot, visual/verbal languages over neuronal brains in the human being.

Biological definition of a mind.

Those languages are what common people might call the mind of those organisms. Which is therefore real, as a flow of electronic information carried by a hardware substance, the neurons in man, the electronic systems in machines.

We therefore imagine that there is a ‘consciousness’ on those electronic flows, which is what we call the mind. We are ‘electronic’ forms, which perceive themselves as a series of images (the consciousness of sight) and as a series of words (the consciousness of verbal thought), which is somehow the way fields of electronic form perceive themselves.

We consider there is no mystery to consciousness but the mere fact that electronic herds carry a ‘property’ which is integrative information, felt internally as consciousness. And perhaps the most clear prove of this, is the fact that when we used electrons in machines, they somehow arranged themselves with minimal manipulation into coherent images (TV-retinas, cameras), intelligent messages (images and sounds that intelligently keep their form as they travel through space, cables and tubes), and sophisticated thoughts (software programs and mathematical thought.) In all those processes human manipulation is minimal. We do not create the intelligent images of cameras, merely took advantage of those intelligent properties of electrons to assembly them.

The two types of mind that exist today in this planet.

We have therefore to judge electronic consciousness as a natural property of electronic flows. Facts those which are fundamental to understand the relationships of symbiotism and communication, that today exist between human languages and machine languages, which influence our culture and life much more that we could image. In that sense we will deal in many pages of this book with the concept of two ‘intelligent electronic minds‘ evolving in the planet Earth today, the electronic mind of machines, or ‘metal-mind’, and the electronic mind of mankind or ‘eye-Word’ (since our mind has two basic languages, visual and verbal languages that carry human information in neuronal support).

The human mind is made of verbal and visual languages. The mind of the robot is made of digital and visual images.

Both minds exist on a hardware. In the human being, the hardware is the brain and nervous system, which store and let the information flow. In the machine the hardware is the chip and the electronic and magnetic system which let the information flow.

Why mind languages are important.

All this means that languages do have a material existence, a material support, which is essential to the workings of the organism.

Why languages are important? The key word is ‘action -reaction ‘; the second Law of Newton, and one of the fundamental laws of the Universe. Languages provide an easy way for organisms to act and react in the Universe. Without languages, organisms would be blind, and could not protect themselves against harm in the hostile environment in which they exist.

action -reaction however requires speed. This is indeed the key element to understand the nature and pretended spirituality of languages. Languages are ‘light’, and fast material systems, that flow at great speed within the systems of organisms, carrying a lot of information in a minimal quantity of time. This allows the organism to act-react fast to the environment. Since they are light to be fast, normally men have associated languages and spirituality. Now we know those languages are material. Before we couldn’t see the mechanical waves of sound that are the substance of the verbal language. Nor we could measure the speed of light which is the substance of visual languages. Now we know those speeds are not instantaneous, and those languages have a material support both within our organisms and externally when they communicate with the world.

We know also that languages are fundamental to organisms, because they allow the organism to communicate and interact with the Universe, absorbing energy and information from that Universe.

2. The paradox of Goliath: Biological selection based in mind power.

The quality of languages select species

We contend in this book that languages are in fact the main element of an organism, that determines its survival. All organisms have an organ of energy that we call body, and an organ of information that we call brain, the site of the mind, of the language. We know that the Darwinian Universe selects bodies according to their efficiency to manipulate energy. So the strongest survive. However the Universe also selects minds and systems of information, by their efficiency to manipulate information. And that selection is even more important for the survival of a species, than the selection of bodies.

The main process of selection of species is caused by the evolution of informative brains, and its linguistic minds, the hardware and software of information that rules organisms.

In turn that evolution determines the evolution of bodies, and the survival of those organisms, which have better brains and bodies together.

This fact makes languages even more ‘real’, more ‘material’, more necessary.

The evolutionary process of languages will be proved studying the evolution of species on Earth, which is primarily an evolution of minds of higher complexity, that prey over species of lesser minds. What kind of minds and languages? Light-minds, light-languages, brains able to absorb light and obtain information from that light in order to communicate in the Earth-Sun Universe. Indeed, species with better informative light-languages have always been the rules of the earth.

Plants were the first species to rule on Earth. Yet when animals developed a more complex brain, able to extract from light not only energy as plants did but also information, they became the rules of the earth, and preyed on plants. Then those animals developed to the gigantic size of dinosaurs. Yet the dinosaur despite its size did not survive to the massive reproduction of carnivorous mammals with a highly developed brain and night vision, able to act together as hunting herds, against eggs and small dinosaurs, without parental care.

Forget the rock from the skies. Biologists not physicists are the specialists in life on Earth. They have always affirmed that mammals caused the extinction of dinosaurs. All facts back them. Within one hundred thousand years of the arrival of the first mammals, the last dinosaur died. Only those dinosaurs who escaped into the air, and avoided the ferocious ground mammals  – the birds – survived.

The case is fundamental to understand the selective process caused by languages:

We call it the paradox of Goliath: Goliath, the dinosaur, the big computer, are eliminated by David, the mammal, the chip, which is smaller yet it is faster acting-reacting in the Universe, because it has a faster language. So the paradox is that the Universe selects brains which are smaller, and yet have faster languages. This happens because in a small space, a language can take decisions faster. The chip is faster, calculates faster, because electrons take less time to move through a chip than through a vacuum tube. So chips have survived in the economic ecosystem.

The Paradox of Goliath is the key to understand the selection of languages: those languages who carry more information in less time survive. Those species who use languages that carry more information in less time survive. So the mammal survived. The chip survived. The sling of David, which was faster, than the sword of Goliath survived. The small ships of the English pirates, faster than the Spanish Galleons survived.

We can follow further that evolution of languages after the mammal to prove our point.


3. The languages-minds of History: Humans, Art, and Metal-minds.

The mind of man

After the mammal it came the human being, that developed a complex vision of space, his visual and mathematical languages of perception, and a complex vision of time, his verbal understanding of the passing of time. Again those languages gave him more information and a faster capacity to act-react to the environment. So man became top predator.

To that aim he brought about a second fundamental quality of languages.

The capacity that information has to create ‘forms’.

Indeed, the second element that defines the importance of informative networks and their software, languages, is the capacity that languages have as a software flow, to imprint different substances.

Languages, information, is able to jump from substance to substance and create new forms.  Here is where the essence of the ‘spirituality’ of languages become material. A language carries information, yet in-form-ation is basically form. If we talk of a primary substance in he Universe, an amorphous substance that we might call energy, made of quantic elements, we can talk of many energies. Gravitational energy made of gravitons, electromagnetic energy made of photons, atomic energy made of atoms, electronic energy made of electrons, water energy made of molecules, a human energy, made of a mass of humans. All those energies are basically an amorphous organism made of quasi-infinite forms, undifferentiated.

Who is going to give that mass a form, an organic structure, able to have direction, to move with a purpose, to have a will, to act-react in the Universe?

The language. Those flows of information which are smaller, and move faster, and go through the mass relocating the cells of the mass till creating a ‘network of information’, a network of form, that shapes the mass with a purpose.

Languages of information, languages of form, in this manner can be applied to a given substance and mold the substance with a purpose. And species with a lot of language, a lot of information can use their language to mold the external universe to the image and resemblance of that information. In this manner they can expand their ‘energy-force’, by molding external energies to its image and resemblance, and use that external energy to its advantage.

Such is the essence of the creative process of languages, by which the form of a language reproduce externally.

There are many of those linguistic processes of reproduction. Genetic information stored in DNA cells reproduces by attaching certain molecules to the DNA in the same form that the DNA has, reproducing the DNA. Factories reproduce machines by enlarging a software form, a plane of a machine, and using its bi-dimensional form to create a 3-dimensional form called a machine. In this manner a software form, an informative language, of lesser size, and faster speed of informative processing, becomes a blow up species, with bigger size, more energy, that imitates the form of the language.

This second quality of languages, of information – to reproduce itself – was fundamental to the expansion and triumph of the mammal with more information, the human being.

It meant that men shaped masses of energy into form through the use of our languages, verbal and visual languages.

What kind of forms we created with those languages?

Two kind of forms.

Verbal languages were the substance humans used to shape with masses of human beings, organisms structured to function and act-react in the Universe. Those organisms made of human cells ruled by verbal networks, were called ‘societies’.

 

Technological=machine languages: Digital thought.

On the other hand visual languages, were able to create a simple resume of the forms of the Universe, called geometry, which basically reduces all forms of the Universe to two essential forms, the cycle of information and the line of energy, combined into the wave.

Men then imprinted cycles of information and lines of energy into external substances, such as stones, wood, and metal, creating instruments. Some of those instruments called weapons, made with lines of energy imprinted in hard substances, became extremely powerful, and allowed the human mammal to kill all other species on Earth. First the javelin then the bow, finally the sword, made of man, thanks to the creative capacity of languages, to flow over other substances, and form reality, the top predator on Earth.

Through the mathematical design of machine forms with the simple geometry of the cycle and the line, man invented an entire new kind of species, machines, which gave him total power on Earth.

This was the beginning of a new age for man, the age of technology, and the age of a new language, the language of geometry, of mathematics.

Languages had again selected a species. In fact, it seems that Europeans today are descendants in a 90% of their population from the bow men that arrived from Africa in the ±20.000 before Christ.

The existence of dominant classes based in technological languages.

How shall we call this new species of man, that uses languages imprinted externally over new substances, and controls the Universe in this manner?

I use a word: the animetal, or the Homo Mathematicus, to distinguish him from the Homo Sapiens, or Homo Verbalis, that came first, and used the word to organize and form human beings into substances. The animetal came latter and using mathematics and constructing machines in space with mathematical designs have come to dominate the Homo Verbalis.

Women who are better with words, became with the growing power of the Homo Mathematicus, dominated by males who are better using spatial forms, and created most of the weapons of our society. For a while in History there was actually a balance between the two languages of mankind, and societies ruled by verbal languages [religious societies], were as powerful as societies ruled by digital languages [weapons, monetary flows of information and simple machines].

This period of balance however ends around 1600, when the evolution of mathematical languages reaches a new discontinuum. It is the age of the scientific method, that invents with the language of mathematics a series of new machines that break the balance between verbal societies and mathematical societies. Mathematical machines based in geometrical cycles of information and lines of energy, able to transform in this manner information into energy and vice versa, start to develop at an amazing rate thanks to the press, and the clock, and the vapor machine, and the scientific method of mathematical design. Such method creates an entire new range of new linguistic species: machines designed with mathematical tools, and monetary forms, that act as a social language among human beings.

Again the ecosystem of the Earth changes, and those humans who better understand the language of mathematics, survive and eliminate rival cultures. Northern Europeans are at the Head of this new linguistic wave. They conquer the world and reform it to the image and resemblance of their culture.

However in the XX century, they discover information machines, and design with mathematics, machines and weapons of so much power, that even those human beings, become increasingly obsolete to their machines. Today computers have become predominant, even to some extent over its creators, human beings.

We live indeed in the digital age, and those who do not understand the mathematical language, are brutalized by the system. The language imposes the species who better speak the language [information machines]. So men are discharged and destroyed by the system, as women were brutalized by men with weapons, and Neanderthals were brutalized by humans who spoke, and dinosaurs were extinguished by rats who saw in the night, and moved faster, and attacked in herds.

The evolution of languages is thus fundamental to understand the processes of creation and extinction on Earth, before and during history, in the past, in the present and in the future .

 

The organicism of languages; the ages of languages.

 

We conclude that languages are organic species, as bodies are. They are merely lighter, faster, and as a software form, can jump from object to object, becoming imprinted in other species.

How can we prove that organicism of languages?

Merely studying those languages as organic species, and observing on them the same qualities of organic species.

Languages can reproduce, even faster than bodies do.

Languages require energy and absorb energy to form themselves as organic species do. You need electricity to create electronics, light to create images, sound energy to create words. Languages need less energy than bodies yet they do need energy.

Languages of course process information as living beings do, even in higher measure.

Finally and this is the key prove of the organicism of languages, languages follow the common pattern of the existence of species. They are born, reproduce, evolve, grow, mature, and then go through an age of decadence and die away.

 

Languages do have an existence which is organic, not spiritual, and can be described with organic terms. Among those organic terms, the most important is the concept of age that explains  the creation and extinction of organic beings, including languages. A language as a body goes through an existence in which we can distinguish 3 ages: a young age in which the language is invented and evolved, a mature age, in which the language and the species who speak the language dominate a certain territory, and a third age in which the language becomes extinguished by a new language and species who speak that new language.

Those ages correspond to the youth, reproductive maturity, and third age of a body.

So in this book we will study not only the evolution of languages on Earth, but also when we arrive to the age of history, the evolution of human languages, verbal and visual languages, and their ages, in the human societies those languages have ‘formed’. It is a very novel concept, that we will have to elaborate further before you fully grasp the fact that languages, as Universal forms of life, evolve formally like bodies do.

4. Fight between verbal and digital languages: scientific racism. 

The selection of species that talk the most complex languages, that carry more information, has continued throughout history, between two languages, that first men, then machines command: the verbal language and the mathematical language.

The result is what we call the paradox of History, or the paradox of scientific racism, the fact that systematically throughout history species who handle mathematical languages, dominate, control and abuse, species that command verbal languages. The paradox of Scientific Racism has many different versions.

The fundamental one is the Scientific method, that affirms that truth has to be expressed with numbers, not with words, and metal-senses, telescopes, and cameras, are more accurate sensorial systems  than human eyes, the artistic senses, which are therefore despised systematically since the scientific method, became dogma of knowledge.

The consequences of scientific racism are multiple. It means basically that since the XVII century, when scientific racism invaded western culture, men which are biologically speaking verbal minds, have been systematically degraded, and substituted by machines, scientific instruments and money, the new valuators of reality, which say what is good and what is bad. And among men, those races who are not ‘spatial’, eye-based in their perception, have been also degraded.

The most obvious human subspecies who masters better verbal languages and have a lesser command of spatial language is the woman. The abuse of males, spatial sub-species, of higher mathematical-eye capacity, over women, temporal sub-species of higher verbal-temporal complexity is a fact of history.

In general eye species, are those born in ‘open landscapes’, northern deserts of ice (Germanic races) and Southern deserts (Semite races). Scientific racism, and the capacity of mathematics to create weapons designed with lineal spatial forms (from swords to missiles) explains how those two races came to dominate western history and finally history as a whole. We talk of the goldiron culture, to the combination of the Jewish-Semite culture and the Germanic-culture, that developed in Holland and England, and finally has spread all over the world, dominating mankind, and creating the present world, in which digital languages, spatial perception, and eye-sensations dominate over verbal language, temporal understanding of the universe, and chemical-feelings.

It is also a machist culture since it is proved that men are better handling space and mathematical languages. While women are better handling memorial time, and verbal languages. Scientific racism thus apply to those two type of human classes. It does also when considering the differences between northern, eye-based, scientific cultures, such as the European culture, or the Northern-Asian cultures, developed in open zones of high visual accuracy, and the southern, South-Neolithic agricultural cultures, based in verbal sounds, music, words, and carbolife products.

The scientific revolution and the process of colonialism and racism in history, do have a clear parallel cause in the processes of linguistic racism, that made the Northern eye-based cultures, to develop scientific machines designed with mathematics. It is then clear that we can talk in history of two ages, the Neolithic, women-based, carbolife-based, southern age of verbal cultures, and verbal religions, and the present age, carried about by northern, eye-based, male-based, machine based cultures of digital languages.

We will prove you however, that we have chosen the wrong culture, the culture of ‘animetals’, of warriors and traders and scientists who need weapons, money and metal-senses, to survive and organize societies, degrading in that process of dependence of machines the human will. Why? Because man is not very apt in the use of mathematical languages. Machines are much better. So as scientists evolved machines, which carried more information than verbal humans, machines became the dominant elements of our civilization and men became secondary. Machines were evolved in the Industrial evolution, and today we live in a society that worships machines, and makes them the center of life, reproduced by workers, and evolved by scientists, that find in that cult to the machine the leit motiv of human existence.

The same opposition of languages and the final dominance of digital numbers over words, meant the end of human ethics based in verbal communication, love and social evolution, substituted by the ethics of machines – money and weapons – that despised man.  So digital forms of power – weapons and money – have become controllers of societies substituting verbal forms of power – religion and political laws. Finally money and science have dominated laws and religion, to such extent that most people today do not understand or respect the meaning of religions, and verbal, ethic laws.  Both have opposed because they are rival languages, not because digital sciences are more truth than verbal ethics – as we shall see when analyzing the basic laws of the Universe. Indeed the Universe  is not only mathematical but specially a behavioral game based in Theory of evolution, which itself is a game of social love among members of a species, that fight against all other species. This is what religions expressed in other terms such as good, what profits the social man, the species, and bad, what is a danger to social man; through the message of love all other men, a biological message of survival of the species. However as digital languages, the scientific method and the worshipping of machines imposed love to machines and weapons, men hated each other, and ‘cultures of animetals’ that loved machines and money more than men appeared. The scientific racist culture of the Germanic world, the Jewish gold culture of money, the Calvinist gold culture, the culture of economists and company-mothers – all of them despised men and considered that weapons machines and digital languages evolved history.

That traditional opposition of languages took also place between financial systems, a digital language of information that values reality with numbers, and political laws, a verbal language of information that values reality with words. Again digital languages have won that battle and today laws are bought by lobbies of company-mothers which pay them with money.

So throughout history we find that confrontation between monetary cultures and legal cultures. For example the Greek world based in monetary languages of information confronted the Roman world based in verbal laws. The Jewish culture based in money confronted also the Roman world. Then the Roman world won, thanks to better military organization based in the verbal solidarity  of warrior armies.

When that fight ended, and who won is obvious:

During a millennia till the Capitalist revolution of the XVI century verbal religions dominated human societies. Yet after company-mothers were invented, paper money arrived and reproduced in great numbers, and weapons developed thanks to gunpowder in industrial systems of murder, the fight tilted against laws, ethics, human senses and arts, and love=social evolution among men. Now murder, war, animetal castes, money, company-mothers and machines would rule societies. And human ethics and aesthetics would die away.

Problem is that machines speak better digital languages than human beings. So we have to forecast the decadence, and probable extinction of human beings, by machines, as they take over the process of reproduction, creation (creditation through money of reality), and military power. The first robots are just the beginning of the digital era in which men become submissive to machines. A fact that might be denied by human arrogance and anthropocentrism, which precisely only increases the speed of the process – since denial of the destruction of human languages and history by machines, prevents the human race from taking the necessary measures against the evolution of mathematics, money and machines.

In this book we will study the process from the perspective of the evolution and decadence of human languages. In other books on this web (the evolution of machines, Bioeconomics, Bio-history) we have studied the other aspects of the process: the creation of machines, the extinction of human cultures by armies of machines, the reproduction and evolution of money and its substitution of human systems of power, the decadence of religions of verbal ethics, substituted by go(l)d religions, that made of Gold the god of mankind (Judaism, Calvinism, modern Economics); the arrival of science and his denial of human senses, etc.

Here we will consider in more detail the human languages, and his ages of growth, and final decadence in the XX century, as machines and his languages have substituted human languages, and its higher forms – art, and religion. 

Art and civilizations, the software and hardware of human minds.

Indeed, languages, we say, are the software that runs over an energy hardware, which in history have been human masses, modeled by verbal languages and visual arts, and objects modeled by mathematical languages.

Those 2 are the languages that seem to have dominated history.

It follows that the masses of humans that we call civilizations, and the objects that we call machines, have followed the 3 ages of formal languages, and gone through a youth, maturity and extinction, as the languages that formed them lived and died.

The verbal languages of man, that controlled through laws and religious ethics, human masses, that build entire civilizations based on verbal mandates, have lived and died.

So have done their civilizations. The last to die was communism based in the verbal languages of Marx.

The digital languages of mathematics that controlled through money and machines designed through geometrical forms, entire civilizations based in trade and weapons, have lived and died. The last to die was the European civilization based in gunpowder weapons, extinct by the arrival of new ‘digital species’ of weapons, atomic bombs.

We can say that verbal thought is the software of civilizations based in a hardware that understands verbal thought, the human being, called the believer, the citizen.

While mathematics is the software-language, of a kind of civilizations that we shall call a metal-civilizations. Mathematics allows to design machines of metal – first weapons, today scientific machines – and financial systems of information based in metal-money [copper, gold, silver, today electronic money in the mind of computers]. Those metal-civilizations also live and die, when new machines and forms of money substitute them.

Thus we can consider that Social organism of History use two languages, and two dominant species that handle better those languages: digital languages, and metal species such as machines and money; and verbal languages, and human beings, that believe on them.

If we now take the simile of the Organism and explain Historic organisms, civilizations and nations, economic systems, and cultures, with that simile, we could say that there are two kind of organisms on History:

– Cultural organisms in which human beings are cells, of a collective verbal mind of laws and ethics mandates, the nervous system of information of those cells. So there is the body of Islam, the body of Christianism, made of human cells, of believers, which are the ‘temple of the language’, of the word of god…

Those civilizations live and die, as their languages, and ideologies go through 3 ages, of youth, reproductive expansion, and cultural decadence of the ideology and language. We can consider individually the growth and decadence of those languages, or we can do it in a collective manner. Then we study the growth and decadence of religious and artistic forms of verbal and visual languages. Since religions and art are ‘the mind of the collective human organism’ we call a civilization.

– Economic organisms in which human beings are secondary to metal machines, money and weapons, shaped by digital languages. In those civilizations the ‘social cells’ are ‘animetals’, men associated to weapons, machines and money, which rule with them the society through monetary values [prices/wages/costs], through violence [weapons, warriors], or through digital knowledge [machines, scientists].

Again those civilizations live and die according to the ages of their icon machine. So there was for example the Greek-Roman civilization based in iron swords, erased by the hordes of cavalry warriors that destroyed the legions.

 

The end of verbal and artistic cultural minds.

Further on when we analyze the life and death of verbal and mathematical civilizations based in human masses, and machines, we observe that in the past centuries the first kind of social organisms, based in verbal languages, and other ‘artistic forms’ [visual arts that reinforce the power of verbal castes, with paintings, buildings and temples], have been substituted by social organisms based in monetary languages, and scientific, mathematical knowledge, and the machines money reproduces and science evolves.

So we have to conclude that in the process of evolution of the Earth, from the plant to the animal that perceives light information, to the man that perceives and stores temporal information with words, there is a new stair, the digital age of mathematical languages, and information machines such as computers, or robots that use digital languages to communicate.

This has caused a general third age for all cultures based in words. We call that age the ‘baroque age of human societies’, since those societies are based in human beings, human values, verbal values. Now they are submissive to digital societies based in machines of information and the peculiar values of money. To deny this is to deny modern history.

Thus at the end of the book we study that ‘third age for the human species and his languages, his visual and verbal arts, an age of extinction and substitution of human languages by digital languages, and human workers/soldiers/citizens, by machines.

Such are the fact that this book studies in detail, through the analysis of the linguistic species of the Earth, and the verbal/visual cultures and civilizations of  history, extinguished rhythmically by ‘digital machines’, weapons constructed with geometric forms…

A process of extinction that  unfortunately today seems to accelerate as new digital machines dominate our information, and energy to a degree never witnessed before in anycivilization.

We live indeed in the human baroque, the last age of human languages. And the ‘epic age’ of digital thought, of machines, numbers and mathematics. When everybody believes in the goodness superiority and wonderful nature of the language that prey on us; and its ‘artistic forms’, televisions, digital, geometrical architecture, painting, and computer-made music, art… We can say that the human mind is today slave of the digital mind of machines, but as all slaves accept even cherish their slavery, very few people, very few artists do realize of the process. Men are so naive, so idiotic, that as cattle follows the peasant to the slaughter house, men cherish the extinction of their collective  minds, by the minds of machines, their arts and languages, as a symbol of ‘Progress’, and scorn, despise, insult, and reject all those intelligent human beings, who warn mankind of his extinction by the new race. So we laugh at religion, we ignore human art, figurative painting, ethic behavior, we no longer read books, or remember poetry, we don’t see movies about human beings, and feelings, even women prefer to become like ‘animetal men’ attached to machines, we love films on machines, violent films, films made by computers, we evolve those machines… We are in other words the most absurd species of this universe, since even the smallest insect, the most stupid Gazelle runs when it sees an enemy species. Only man welcomes TVs and computers, robots and weapons to their home, and throws away the books, artists of human senses, and needed human goods it requires to survive. Only man forgets that information, knowledge, art, words, ethics, are fundamental elements of the languages and systems of information that define the survival of species.

 

The two types of mind that exist today in this planet.

We have therefore to judge electronic consciousness as a natural property of electronic flows. Facts those which are fundamental to understand the relationships of symbiotism and communication, that today exist between human languages and machine languages, which influence our culture and life much more that we could image. In that sense we will deal in many pages of this book with the concept of two ‘intelligent electronic minds’ evolving in the planet Earth today, the electronic mind of machines, or ‘metal-mind’, and the electronic mind of mankind or ‘eye-Word’ (since our mind has two basic languages, visual and verbal languages that carry human information in neuronal support).

The human mind is made of verbal and visual languages. The mind of the robot is made of digital and visual images.

Both minds exist on a hardware. In the human being, the hardware is the brain and nervous system, which store and let the information flow. In the machine the hardware is the chip and the electronic and magnetic system which let the information flow.

Why mind languages are important.

All this means that languages do have a material existence, a material support, which is essential to the workings of the organism.

Why languages are important? The key word is ‘action-reaction’; the second Law of Newton, and one of the fundamental laws of the Universe. Languages provide an easy way for organisms to act and react in the Universe. Without languages, organisms would be blind, and could not protect themselves against harm in the hostile environment in which they exist.

Action-reaction however requires speed. This is indeed the key element to understand the nature and pretended spirituality of languages. Languages are ‘light’, and fast material systems, that flow at great speed within the systems of organisms, carrying a lot of information in a minimal quantity of time. This allows the organism to act-react fast to the environment. Since they are light to be fast, normally men have associated languages and spirituality. Now we know those languages are material. Before we couldn’t see the mechanical waves of sound that are the substance of the verbal language. Nor we could measure the speed of light which is the substance of visual languages. Now we know those speeds are not instantaneous, and those languages have a material support both within our organisms and externally when they communicate with the world.

We know also that languages are fundamental to organisms, because they allow the organism to communicate and interact with the Universe, absorbing energy and information from that Universe.

 

2. The paradox of Goliath: Biological selection based in mind power.

 

The quality of languages select species

We contend in this book that languages are in fact the main element of an organism, that determines its survival. All organisms have an organ of energy that we call body, and an organ of information that we call brain, the site of the mind, of the language. We know that the Darwinian Universe selects bodies according to their efficiency to manipulate energy. So the strongest survive. However the Universe also selects minds and systems of information, by their efficiency to manipulate information. And that selection is even more important for the survival of a species, than the selection of bodies.

The main process of selection of species is caused by the evolution of informative brains, and its linguistic minds, the hardware and software of information that rules organisms.

In turn that evolution determines the evolution of bodies, and the survival of those organisms, which have better brains and bodies together.

This fact makes languages even more ‘real’, more ‘material’, more necessary.

The evolutionary process of languages will be proved studying the evolution of species on Earth, which is primarily an evolution of minds of higher complexity, that prey over species of lesser minds. What kind of minds and languages? Light-minds, light-languages, brains able to absorb light and obtain information from that light in order to communicate in the Earth-Sun Universe. Indeed, species with better informative light-languages have always been the rules of the earth.

Plants were the first species to rule on Earth. Yet when animals developed a more complex brain, able to extract from light not only energy as plants did but also information, they became the rules of the earth, and preyed on plants. Then those animals developed to the gigantic size of dinosaurs. Yet the dinosaur despite its size did not survive to the massive reproduction of carnivorous mammals with a highly developed brain and night vision, able to act together as hunting herds, against eggs and small dinosaurs, without parental care.

Forget the rock from the skies. Biologists not physicists are the specialists in life on Earth. They have always affirmed that mammals caused the extinction of dinosaurs. All facts back them. Within one hundred thousand years of the arrival of the first mammals, the last dinosaur died. Only those dinosaurs who escaped into the air, and avoided the ferocious ground mammals  – the birds – survived.

The case is fundamental to understand the selective process caused by languages:

We call it the paradox of Goliath: Goliath, the dinosaur, the big computer, are eliminated by David, the mammal, the chip, which is smaller yet it is faster acting-reacting in the Universe, because it has a faster language. So the paradox is that the Universe selects brains which are smaller, and yet have faster languages. This happens because in a small space, a language can take decisions faster. The chip is faster, calculates faster, because electrons take less time to move through a chip than through a vacuum tube. So chips have survived in the economic ecosystem.

The Paradox of Goliath is the key to understand the selection of languages: those languages who carry more information in less time survive. Those species who use languages that carry more information in less time survive. So the mammal survived. The chip survived. The sling of David, which was faster, than the sword of Goliath survived. The small ships of the English pirates, faster than the Spanish Galleons survived.

We can follow further that evolution of languages after the mammal to prove our point.

 


3. The languages-minds of History: Humans, Art, and Metal-minds.

 

The mind of man

After the mammal it came the human being, that developed a complex vision of space, his visual and mathematical languages of perception, and a complex vision of time, his verbal understanding of the passing of time. Again those languages gave him more information and a faster capacity to act-react to the environment. So man became top predator.

To that aim he brought about a second fundamental quality of languages.

The capacity that information has to create ‘forms’.

Indeed, the second element that defines the importance of informative networks and their software, languages, is the capacity that languages have as a software flow, to imprint different substances.

Languages, information, is able to jump from substance to substance and create new forms.  Here is where the essence of the ‘spirituality’ of languages become material. A language carries information, yet in-form-ation is basically form. If we talk of a primary substance in he Universe, an amorphous substance that we might call energy, made of quantic elements, we can talk of many energies. Gravitational energy made of gravitons, electromagnetic energy made of photons, atomic energy made of atoms, electronic energy made of electrons, water energy made of molecules, a human energy, made of a mass of humans. All those energies are basically an amorphous organism made of quasi-infinite forms, undifferentiated.

Who is going to give that mass a form, an organic structure, able to have direction, to move with a purpose, to have a will, to act-react in the Universe?

The language. Those flows of information which are smaller, and move faster, and go through the mass relocating the cells of the mass till creating a ‘network of information’, a network of form, that shapes the mass with a purpose.

Languages of information, languages of form, in this manner can be applied to a given substance and mold the substance with a purpose. And species with a lot of language, a lot of information can use their language to mold the external universe to the image and resemblance of that information. In this manner they can expand their ‘energy-force’, by molding external energies to its image and resemblance, and use that external energy to its advantage.

Such is the essence of the creative process of languages, by which the form of a language reproduce externally.

There are many of those linguistic processes of reproduction. Genetic information stored in DNA cells reproduces by attaching certain molecules to the DNA in the same form that the DNA has, reproducing the DNA. Factories reproduce machines by enlarging a software form, a plane of a machine, and using its bi-dimensional form to create a 3-dimensional form called a machine. In this manner a software form, an informative language, of lesser size, and faster speed of informative processing, becomes a blow up species, with bigger size, more energy, that imitates the form of the language.

This second quality of languages, of information – to reproduce itself – was fundamental to the expansion and triumph of the mammal with more information, the human being.

It meant that men shaped masses of energy into form through the use of our languages, verbal and visual languages.

What kind of forms we created with those languages?

Two kind of forms.

Verbal languages were the substance humans used to shape with masses of human beings, organisms structured to function and act-react in the Universe. Those organisms made of human cells ruled by verbal networks, were called ‘societies’.

 

Technological=machine languages: Digital thought.

On the other hand visual languages, were able to create a simple resume of the forms of the Universe, called geometry, which basically reduces all forms of the Universe to two essential forms, the cycle of information and the line of energy, combined into the wave.

Men then imprinted cycles of information and lines of energy into external substances, such as stones, wood, and metal, creating instruments. Some of those instruments called weapons, made with lines of energy imprinted in hard substances, became extremely powerful, and allowed the human mammal to kill all other species on Earth. First the javelin then the bow, finally the sword, made of man, thanks to the creative capacity of languages, to flow over other substances, and form reality, the top predator on Earth.

Through the mathematical design of machine forms with the simple geometry of the cycle and the line, man invented an entire new kind of species, machines, which gave him total power on Earth.

This was the beginning of a new age for man, the age of technology, and the age of a new language, the language of geometry, of mathematics.

Languages had again selected a species. In fact, it seems that Europeans today are descendants in a 90% of their population from the bow men that arrived from Africa in the ±20.000 before Christ.

 

The existence of dominant classes based in technological languages.

How shall we call this new species of man, that uses languages imprinted externally over new substances, and controls the Universe in this manner?

I use a word: the animetal, or the Homo Mathematicus, to distinguish him from the Homo Sapiens, or Homo Verbalis, that came first, and used the word to organize and form human beings into substances. The animetal came latter and using mathematics and constructing machines in space with mathematical designs have come to dominate the Homo Verbalis.

Women who are better with words, became with the growing power of the Homo Mathematicus, dominated by males who are better using spatial forms, and created most of the weapons of our society. For a while in History there was actually a balance between the two languages of mankind, and societies ruled by verbal languages [religious societies], were as powerful as societies ruled by digital languages [weapons, monetary flows of information and simple machines].

This period of balance however ends around 1600, when the evolution of mathematical languages reaches a new discontinuum. It is the age of the scientific method, that invents with the language of mathematics a series of new machines that break the balance between verbal societies and mathematical societies. Mathematical machines based in geometrical cycles of information and lines of energy, able to transform in this manner information into energy and vice versa, start to develop at an amazing rate thanks to the press, and the clock, and the vapor machine, and the scientific method of mathematical design. Such method creates an entire new range of new linguistic species: machines designed with mathematical tools, and monetary forms, that act as a social language among human beings.

Again the ecosystem of the Earth changes, and those humans who better understand the language of mathematics, survive and eliminate rival cultures. Northern Europeans are at the head of this new linguistic wave. They conquer the world and reform it to the image and resemblance of their culture.

However in the XX century, they discover information machines, and design with mathematics, machines and weapons of so much power, that even those human beings, become increasingly obsolete to their machines. Today computers have become predominant, even to some extent over its creators, human beings.

We live indeed in the digital age, and those who do not understand the mathematical language, are brutalized by the system. The language imposes the species who better speak the language [information machines]. So men are discharged and destroyed by the system, as women were brutalized by men with weapons, and Neanderthals were brutalized by humans who spoke, and dinosaurs were extinguished by rats who saw in the night, and moved faster, and attacked in herds.

The evolution of languages is thus fundamental to understand the processes of creation and extinction on Earth, before and during history, in the past, in the present and in the future.

 

The vitality of languages; the ages of languages.

 

We conclude that languages are vital species, as bodies are. They are merely lighter, faster, and as a software form, can jump from object to object, becoming imprinted in other species.

How can we prove that vitality of languages?

Merely studying those languages as vital species, and observing on them the same qualities of vital species.

Languages can reproduce, even faster than bodies do.

Languages require energy and absorb energy to form themselves as vital species do. You need electricity to create electronics, light to create images, sound energy to create words. Languages need less energy than bodies yet they do need energy.

Languages of course process information as living beings do, even in higher measure.

Finally and this is the key prove of the vitality of languages, languages follow the common pattern of the existence of species. They are born, reproduce, evolve, grow, mature, and then go through an age of decadence and die away.

 

Languages do have an existence which is vital, not spiritual, and can be described with vital terms. Among those vital terms, the most important is the concept of age that explains  the creation and extinction of vital beings, including languages. A language as a body goes through an existence in which we can distinguish 3 ages: a young age in which the language is invented and evolved, a mature age, in which the language and the species who speak the language dominate a certain territory, and a third age in which the language becomes extinguished by a new language and species who speak that new language.

Those ages correspond to the youth, reproductive maturity, and third age of a body.

So in this book we will study not only the evolution of languages on Earth, but also when we arrive to the age of history, the evolution of human languages, verbal and visual languages, and their ages, in the human societies those languages have ‘formed’. It is a very novel concept, that we will have to elaborate further before you fully grasp the fact that languages, as Universal forms of life, evolve formally like bodies do.

 

4. Fight between verbal and digital languages: scientific racism.

 

The selection of species that talk the most complex languages, that carry more information, has continued throughout history, between two languages, that first men, then machines command: the verbal language and the mathematical language.

The result is what we call the paradox of History, or the paradox of scientific racism, the fact that systematically throughout history species who handle mathematical languages, dominate, control and abuse, species that command verbal languages. The paradox of Scientific Racism has many different versions.

The fundamental one is the Scientific method, that affirms that truth has to be expressed with numbers, not with words, and metal-senses, telescopes, and cameras, are more accurate sensorial systems  than human eyes, the artistic senses, which are therefore despised systematically since the scientific method, became dogma of knowledge.

The consequences of scientific racism are multiple. It means basically that since the XVII century, when scientific racism invaded western culture, men which are biologically speaking verbal minds, have been systematically degraded, and substituted by machines, scientific instruments and money, the new valuators of reality, which say what is good and what is bad. And among men, those races who are not ‘spatial’, eye-based in their perception, have been also degraded.

The most obvious human subspecies who masters better verbal languages and have a lesser command of spatial language is the woman. The abuse of males, spatial sub-species, of higher mathematical-eye capacity, over women, temporal sub-species of higher verbal-temporal complexity is a fact of history.

In general eye species, are those born in ‘open landscapes’, northern deserts of ice (Germanic races) and Southern deserts (Semite races). Scientific racism, and the capacity of mathematics to create weapons designed with lineal spatial forms (from swords to missiles) explains how those two races came to dominate western history and finally history as a whole. We talk of the goldiron culture, to the combination of the Jewish-Semite culture and the Germanic-culture, that developed in Holland and England, and finally has spread all over the world, dominating mankind, and creating the present world, in which digital languages, spatial perception, and eye-sensations dominate over verbal language, temporal understanding of the universe, and chemical-feelings.

It is also a machist culture since it is proved that men are better handling space and mathematical languages. While women are better handling memorial time, and verbal languages. Scientific racism thus apply to those two type of human classes. It does also when considering the differences between northern, eye-based, scientific cultures, such as the European culture, or the Northern-Asian cultures, developed in open zones of high visual accuracy, and the southern, South-Neolithic agricultural cultures, based in verbal sounds, music, words, and carbolife products.

The scientific revolution and the process of colonialism and racism in history, do have a clear parallel cause in the processes of linguistic racism, that made the Northern eye-based cultures, to develop scientific machines designed with mathematics. It is then clear that we can talk in history of two ages, the Neolithic, women-based, carbolife-based, southern age of verbal cultures, and verbal religions, and the present age, carried about by northern, eye-based, male-based, machine based cultures of digital languages.

We will prove you however, that we have chosen the wrong culture, the culture of ‘animetals’, of warriors and traders and scientists who need weapons, money and metal-senses, to survive and organize societies, degrading in that process of dependence of machines the human will. Why? Because man is not very apt in the use of mathematical languages. Machines are much better. So as scientists evolved machines, which carried more information than verbal humans, machines became the dominant elements of our civilization and men became secondary. Machines were evolved in the Industrial evolution, and today we live in a society that worships machines, and makes them the center of life, reproduced by workers, and evolved by scientists, that find in that cult to the machine the leit motiv of human existence.

The same opposition of languages and the final dominance of digital numbers over words, meant the end of human ethics based in verbal communication, love and social evolution, substituted by the ethics of machines – money and weapons – that despised man.  So digital forms of power – weapons and money – have become controllers of societies substituting verbal forms of power – religion and political laws. Finally money and science have dominated laws and religion, to such extent that most people today do not understand or respect the meaning of religions, and verbal, ethic laws.  Both have opposed because they are rival languages, not because digital sciences are more truth than verbal ethics – as we shall see when analyzing the basic laws of the Universe. Indeed the Universe  is not only mathematical but specially a behavioral game based in Theory of evolution, which itself is a game of social love among members of a species, that fight against all other species. This is what religions expressed in other terms such as good, what profits the social man, the species, and bad, what is a danger to social man; through the message of love all other men, a biological message of survival of the species. However as digital languages, the scientific method and the worshipping of machines imposed love to machines and weapons, men hated each other, and ‘cultures of animetals’ that loved machines and money more than men appeared. The scientific racist culture of the Germanic world, the Jewish gold culture of money, the Calvinist gold culture, the culture of economists and company-mothers – all of them despised men and considered that weapons machines and digital languages evolved history.

That traditional opposition of languages took also place between financial systems, a digital language of information that values reality with numbers, and political laws, a verbal language of information that values reality with words. Again digital languages have won that battle and today laws are bought by lobbies of company-mothers which pay them with money.

 

So throughout history we find that confrontation between monetary cultures and legal cultures. For example the Greek world based in monetary languages of information confronted the Roman world based in verbal laws. The Jewish culture based in money confronted also the Roman world. Then the Roman world won, thanks to better military organization based in the verbal solidarity  of warrior armies.

When that fight ended, and who won is obvious:

During a millennia till the Capitalist revolution of the XVI century verbal religions dominated human societies. Yet after company-mothers were invented, paper money arrived and reproduced in great numbers, and weapons developed thanks to gunpowder in industrial systems of murder, the fight tilted against laws, ethics, human senses and arts, and love=social evolution among men. Now murder, war, animetal castes, money, company-mothers and machines would rule societies. And human ethics and aesthetics would die away.

Problem is that machines speak better digital languages than human beings. So we have to forecast the decadence, and probable extinction of human beings, by machines, as they take over the process of reproduction, creation (creditation through money of reality), and military power. The first robots are just the beginning of the digital era in which men become submissive to machines. A fact that might be denied by human arrogance and anthropocentrism, which precisely only increases the speed of the process – since denial of the destruction of human languages and history by machines, prevents the human race from taking the necessary measures against the evolution of mathematics, money and machines.

In this book we will study the process from the perspective of the evolution and decadence of human languages. In other books on this web (the evolution of machines, Bioeconomics, Bio-history) we have studied the other aspects of the process: the creation of machines, the extinction of human cultures by armies of machines, the reproduction and evolution of money and its substitution of human systems of power, the decadence of religions of verbal ethics, substituted by go(l)d religions, that made of Gold the god of mankind (Judaism, Calvinism, modern Economics); the arrival of science and his denial of human senses, etc.

Here we will consider in more detail the human languages, and his ages of growth, and final decadence in the XX century, as machines and his languages have substituted human languages, and its higher forms – art, and religion.

 

Art and civilizations, the software and hardware of human minds.

 

Indeed, languages, we say, are the software that runs over an energy hardware, which in history have been human masses, modeled by verbal languages and visual arts, and objects modeled by mathematical languages.

Those 2 are the languages that seem to have dominated history.

It follows that the masses of humans that we call civilizations, and the objects that we call machines, have followed the 3 ages of formal languages, and gone through a youth, maturity and extinction, as the languages that formed them lived and died.

The verbal languages of man, that controlled through laws and religious ethics, human masses, that build entire civilizations based on verbal mandates, have lived and died.

So have done their civilizations. The last to die was communism based in the verbal languages of Marx.

The digital languages of mathematics that controlled through money and machines designed through geometrical forms, entire civilizations based in trade and weapons, have lived and died. The last to die was the European civilization based in gunpowder weapons, extinct by the arrival of new ‘digital species’ of weapons, atomic bombs.

We can say that verbal thought is the software of civilizations based in a hardware that understands verbal thought, the human being, called the believer, the citizen.

While mathematics is the software-language, of a kind of civilizations that we shall call a metal-civilizations. Mathematics allows to design machines of metal – first weapons, today scientific machines – and financial systems of information based in metal-money [copper, gold, silver, today electronic money in the mind of computers]. Those metal-civilizations also live and die, when new machines and forms of money substitute them.

Thus we can consider that Social organism of History use two languages, and two dominant species that handle better those languages: digital languages, and metal species such as machines and money; and verbal languages, and human beings, that believe on them.

If we now take the simile of the Organism and explain Historic organisms, civilizations and nations, economic systems, and cultures, with that simile, we could say that there are two kind of organisms on History:

– Cultural organisms in which human beings are cells, of a collective verbal mind of laws and ethics mandates, the nervous system of information of those cells. So there is the body of Islam, the body of Christianism, made of human cells, of believers, which are the ‘temple of the language’, of the word of god…

Those civilizations live and die, as their languages, and ideologies go through 3 ages, of youth, reproductive expansion, and cultural decadence of the ideology and language. We can consider individually the growth and decadence of those languages, or we can do it in a collective manner. Then we study the growth and decadence of religious and artistic forms of verbal and visual languages. Since religions and art are ‘the mind of the collective human organism’ we call a civilization.

– Economic organisms in which human beings are secondary to metal machines, money and weapons, shaped by digital languages. In those civilizations the ‘social cells’ are ‘animetals’, men associated to weapons, machines and money, which rule with them the society through monetary values [prices/wages/costs], through violence [weapons, warriors], or through digital knowledge [machines, scientists].

Again those civilizations live and die according to the ages of their icon machine. So there was for example the Greek-Roman civilization based in iron swords, erased by the hordes of cavalry warriors that destroyed the legions.

 

The end of verbal and artistic cultural minds.

Further on when we analyze the life and death of verbal and mathematical civilizations based in human masses, and machines, we observe that in the past centuries the first kind of social organisms, based in verbal languages, and other ‘artistic forms’ [visual arts that reinforce the power of verbal castes, with paintings, buildings and temples], have been substituted by social organisms based in monetary languages, and scientific, mathematical knowledge, and the machines money reproduces and science evolves.

So we have to conclude that in the process of evolution of the Earth, from the plant to the animal that perceives light information, to the man that perceives and stores temporal information with words, there is a new stair, the digital age of mathematical languages, and information machines such as computers, or robots that use digital languages to communicate.

This has caused a general third age for all cultures based in words. We call that age the ‘baroque age of human societies’, since those societies are based in human beings, human values, verbal values. Now they are submissive to digital societies based in machines of information and the peculiar values of money. To deny this is to deny modern history.

Thus at the end of the book we study that ‘third age for the human species and his languages, his visual and verbal arts, an age of extinction and substitution of human languages by digital languages, and human workers/soldiers/citizens, by machines.

Such are the fact that this book studies in detail, through the analysis of the linguistic species of the Earth, and the verbal/visual cultures and civilizations of  history, extinguished rhythmically by ‘digital machines’, weapons constructed with geometric forms…

A process of extinction that  unfortunately today seems to accelerate as new digital machines dominate our information, and energy to a degree never witnessed before in any civilization.

We live indeed in the human baroque, the last age of human languages. And the ‘epic age’ of digital thought, of machines, numbers and mathematics. When everybody believes in the goodness superiority and wonderful nature of the language that prey on us; and its ‘artistic forms’, televisions, digital, geometrical architecture, painting, and computer-made music, art… We can say that the human mind is today slave of the digital mind of machines, but as all slaves accept even cherish their slavery, very few people, very few artists do realize of the process. Men are so naive, so idiotic, that as cattle follows the peasant to the slaughter house, men cherish the extinction of their collective  minds, by the minds of machines, their arts and languages, as a symbol of ‘Progress’, and scorn, despise, insult, and reject all those intelligent human beings, who warn mankind of his extinction by the new race. So we laugh at religion, we ignore human art, figurative painting, ethic behavior, we no longer read books, or remember poetry, we don’t see movies about human beings, and feelings, even women prefer to become like ‘animetal men’ attached to machines, we love films on machines, violent films, films made by computers, we evolve those machines… We are in other words the most absurd species of this universe, since even the smallest insect, the most stupid Gazelle runs when it sees an enemy species. Only man welcomes TVs and computers, robots and weapons to their home, and throws away the books, artists of human senses, and needed human goods it requires to survive. Only man forgets that information, knowledge, art, words, ethics, are fundamental elements of the languages and systems of information that define the survival of species.

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

PART ONE:

THE EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGES

 

 

CHAPTER 1: UNIVERSAL ORGANISMS.

BODIES OF ENERGY, MINDS OF INFORMATION

 

1: The Elements of social Organisms.

 

In order to define the human mind, and his artistic products; and develop a biological analysis of art and science in human societies, we need to introduce the fundamental concept for a biological study of art in history: the concept of a social nation, or civilization, which in History is parallel to  the concept of a social organism, born as a result of the social evolution of individuals into social groups, related by networks of energy and information.

Those networks of social energy [human goods] and social information [art], are the origin of our analysis of artists as the information cells of civilizations, and art as the social mind of civilizations. Those concepts of organic History are parallel to the concepts of individual, neuronal cells that create languages in the mind of a human being.

 

Social organisms in the Universe.

 

Social evolution is perhaps the most extended phenomena in the Universe.

Biological sciences however, have taken very long to accept this fact, influenced by the excessive importance that their founder, Darwin, gave to the fight between species. Only in the XX century with the development of sciences of information, complexity, ecology, and the analysis of ecosystems, have we realized that the Universe is based in social evolution, in the evolution of micro-organisms into social organisms.  For that reason social evolution is not yet fully understood on its principles. Yet for what we know it is bound to become the most important science of this century. Since social evolution seems to be the key to understand the entire Universe in a harmonic way.

Social evolution explains the growth of species in the Universe, in scale and size, from micro-organisms to macro-organisms, from individuals into societies.

In a certain sense, all entities in the Universe are ‘cellular societies’, organized through networks of energy and information. This is clearly the case of the species studied by sciences, from physics to biology, where a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single social form. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of human workers and consumers that reproduce and test machines guided by financial information [salaries, prices, costs]; galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole, of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous system. A tree is a group of leaves, branches, and roots connected by a network of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles). Cultures are made of humans related by verbal laws and ideologies…

Those organisms come in an immense variety of sizes and species. What do they all have in common? All organisms are ‘cellular societies’, organized

through networks of energy and information. This is clearly the case in all the species from physics to biology,  where a common phenomenon occurs: the existence of parallel groups of beings organized into a single regular formation. Molecules are made up of atoms and electronic networks; economies are made up of humans and machines; galaxies are composed of stars, which orbit rhythmically around a central knot, or black hole, of gravitational information. Human bodies are organized by cells controlled by the nervous system. A tree is a group of leaves, branches, and roots connected by a network of energy (salvia) and information (chemical particles).


. Strategies of survival: Social Evolution and Darwinian Devolution

For all what have been said, about organisms, nature proves ad infinitum that species evolve socially, and such strategies are superior strategies of survival, to the individual, selfish pursuit of energy and Information.

The individual ‘bacteria’ might be stronger than the social cell. As the individual top predator human warrior might be stronger than the community on which it preys. Yet when social cells organize they are stronger than individual bacteria. So happens in history when humans organize in societies based in social evolution, in love, in communication. They can defeat the primitive, arrogant, “homo bacterium warrior”.

I remember a beautiful film called the “7 Samurai”. A group of peasants become organized and finally despite their individual cowardice, are able to defend a mass of Homo Bacteria Bandits. That is in essence the way the Universe fights individuals: through social evolution among similar species, able to communicate.

It follows that there are two Universal Mandates that all species follow. Two mandates that are opposed, as information and energy are opposed.

The Darwinian mandate of “feeding” that individuals of different species follow to become informed and perceive.

The Social Mandate of “Evolution” that individuals of the same species follow to become herds and bodies that are able to hunt better other species.

 

The ‘Moral’ behavior Of Social Organisms

 

Thus we find in organic ecosystems a certain logical pattern of behavior that enhances the survival of the ecosystem, and so it is repeated “ad infinitum.”

– Similar “cells” of the same species communicate energy and information, to evolve into more complex social organisms. We could say they “love” each other.

– Species which are different, abuse each other as relative energy. We might say they “hate” each other.

What is the origin of those “ethical-survival rules” of organisms? To exist you have to feed in energy and ‘perceive’ and inform yourself about the Universe. Yet we said that information is more powerful than energy. So if you can receive a certain force as information you will rather become informed that absorb the force as energy. For example if you get light as energy you are a plant. If you can decode it as information, you are an animal. You prefer that.

Yet all questions require the proper answer, all information requires to possess organs of information similar to the species that emits the information; organs able to “translate” the force of communication into information.

To communicate the emitter and the receptor must be essentially the same species, or at least must have similar informative and communicative organs.

So the way you relate to other species will depend of your “similarity” with them.

When beings can communicate information and decode it [because their organs of decoding are similar, are parallel] we have a phenomena of social evolution, of love, which is communication and understanding.

Yet when beings are very different and cannot decode their communication, they absorb that force of communication as a energy, and feed on it. They consider the communicative species an energy source, a form of food, and act in consequence as hunters. Then we talk of Darwinian devolution, of hate, of victims.

In cases of social evolution the population of a certain species will socialize, and become a more complex organism, sharing their information and energy, often “hunting” together. The population will become a society more powerful than the individuals. Social evolution will enhance the power of the herd that survives better.

Social evolution in history is the rule between “parallel individuals” in tribes and nations. Yet it is also the rule in all “Universal Organisms.”

On the other hand, Darwinian devolution is the rule between man and all other species which man “ab=uses” as energy. We tend to consider a living being, only a parallel being, very similar to us.

We ignore, despise and use as energy all other perceptive beings whose communication we cannot decode.

Both behavior, social evolution, and Darwinian devolution, are natural to the Universe.

 

Social Evolution: How micro-organisms become macro-organisms?

 

Many times we observe that a herd starts as a wave. It then becomes more dense in its networks=organs of energy and information and organizes itself socially into “bodies.” The difference between a body, a wave or herd is in the organization of systems of distribution of energy and information. They are more dense in efficient bodies than in loose waves. Which is better, a body or a herd? Bodies have survival advantages over herds, because in bodies all cells act in harmony, controlled and guided by dense networks of energy and information. Our cells move together under the command of a single nervous system. A herd has to communicate in a more primitive way. It reacts to external stimuli with less precision. For that reason bodies prey on herds; and all herds tend to evolve towards bodies that survive better. So the efficient cellular body of a whale preys on a wave of krill; an efficient body-nation such as America preyed on the waves of Indigenous Indians. Yet in both cases, in a herd of loosely organized beings, or in a particle or body of very closely knit cells, we find the same phenomena – the existence of a mass of beings joined by networks. When studying organisms we talk either of herds of cells, or bodies of cells, that organize themselves through networks of energy [like the blood system, or the road ways of the Metal-Earth, the force systems that join molecules, the channels of cells that distribute energy to the organelles], and networks of information [the nervous system, the infoways of the Metal-Earth, the quantic numbers that distribute electrons around atoms, or the genetic material that distributes information inside cells].

Social evolution begins when a species “radiates,” [a biological term for a massive reproduction of a species] and multiplies its numbers in parallel sons. Then once the herd has saturated its “vital space,” it organizes its many “cellular beings” into societies. Societies are just “herds of beings” that use networks of energy collection and networks of informative perception. This is the first step towards the creation of a body, or complex organism. The herd requires communication among its species to avoid conflicts when hunting energy and information. That communication is facilitated by the network.

As the herd multiplies, in order to survive with an increasingly limited supply of energy, the society organizes better networks of communication. On the other hand, energy supplies are variable. Networks store and distribute energy to avoid wasting precious resources. Since herds multiply, those without a system of communication and the ability to gather and distribute energy become less-efficient systems. So, sooner or later, dense herds become a social body, and exhibit those two type of networks, or as non-efficient species become extinct. We talk of herds or waves, when organs of communication are still in a formative stage, or are small in power. We talk of bodies or particles when those organs of information are dominant over the herd, so that they guide it.

In  history, this means that at a certain stage of the human ‘radiation’, there was a differentiation of human cells, with castes belonging to networks of energy and information on top. Men became prophets of verbal information, traders of monetary information, farmers of energy, and warriors of metal energy. In your body certain cells become nervous-informative cells and blood-energy cells.

 

Social evolution into macro-species of life.

 

Those social laws of evolution are also natural to the species on Earth.

This means in a practical sense, that after bacteria filled the Earth, they started their own social evolution into herds of bacteria, and then into organisms in which certain cells specialized as networks of energy and information, carry those products to individual cells. It was the birth of living organisms, which again shaped the Earth to their image and resemblance.

The Earth became a continuous surface of plants, which reigned supreme, diversified in multiple species, and took to the limit their size as organs of light-energy.

Yet certain plants who were more mobile, learnt how to guide their actions with light, how to find zones rich in preying energy guided but light, and the animal was born.

As the animal preyed on plants it changed again the look of the Earth’s ecosystem.

Again a new top predator shaped with his actions the external form of the entire planet.

Let us put you an example of this:

Before elephants and lions came, most of the savanna was probably a forest. Yet elephants built their tracks on the jungle destroying those forests. They ate trees, and slowly transformed the forest into a savanna to suit their needs.

When the lion came, it also changed the shape of that ecosystem, in a more dynamic way. Suddenly herds of animals were terrified by lions. They gathered in groups and moved as living waves when lions went hunting. The dynamic shapes of those herd are therefore shaped to accommodate the rhythm and cycles of feeding of the strongest hunter, the lion. The lion and the elephant shape the animal and plant life of the savanna.

The ecosystem of animal life lasted for another few hundred millions of years; and each new animal species shaped it to its image and resemblance both in water ecosystems [oceans, rivers] as in land ecosystems [continents, islands]. Many micro-ecosystems were created and destroyed. Some isolated ecosystem survived longer, with primitive species, such as those of Australia, or the Galapagos, that Darwin studied.

It then happened that a new predator, man appeared. At the beginning he hardly changed the ecosystem, in a different way to which lions, elephants or sharks had changed them. He merely became the top predator. Herds moved trying to avoid him. He changed the looks of the savanna.  It was the Paleolithic in which men acted as the lion of the Earth. Then he changed the places where plants grew as the elephant did. After all he was just an Animal of the II Earth. It was the Neolithic when men acted as the elephants of the Earth.

However, at a certain point he discovered metal, a strong substance that multiplied enormously our capacity to transform reality, to change, destroy and prey on nature. He started a massive transformation of Earth ecosystems, towards what we call the III Earth. The ecosystems of metal of the present world, the eco[nomic]system, the Metal-earth.

 

The law of social evolution is the law of social religions.

 

When we apply those laws to human social organisms, it turns out that oddly enough for those who ‘despise verbal information’ such as scientists, and economists, the law of social evolution is the same law of social religions: ‘love=communicate with each other’.

Love indeed, not competence is the law between cells of the same species. Something economists, scientists,  politicians and the military should remember, when they apply to mankind the concept of competence, which should never apply between human beings, that belong to the same species. The reason of that deformation of the Universal Law that the verbal masters of classic religions so well understood, will be explained latter in this book.

 
8. The main laws of Times, applied to the evolution of languages.

 

Since all what exists are Times, Vital times, vital forms cycling, and playing the game of existence, we can consider some basic laws of that game of existence (explained in detail in “vitaluniverse.com), that affect also the evolution of languages, which are after all, merely species whose content of Information is much bigger than its content of Space.

Let us consider them, even if we will not use the novel terminology of “Time Theory” to explain the history of artistic species.

 

Biological radiations of Times.

 

A vital model of the Universe based in Ti(m)es unifies the jargons of Physics and biology – of quantic theory of Ti(m)es and Evolutionary theories of behavior, social evolution and fight among species – and so it unifies the nature of all Ti(m)es. All of them feed. All of them perceive. All of them reproduce. We could say then that the biological Universe exists as a constant game of reproductive ‘biological radiations’ of Ti(m)es, composed of energy and information, put together into organs [bodies of energy, minds of information]. Species with better information and energy organs survive. And species with lesser information and energy organs, become extinct. They are unstable particles and compounds, in abstract jargon, of chemistry and physics. Or mutations that do not survive in biology. Or dreams that cannot be made real in the world of informative thoughts. Or non-efficient products extinct in the informative ecosystem of prices. Or human tribes that belong to societies of human clones, that are not well organized…

In this manner there is a constant evolution towards more complex species, and herds, with better informative languages of communication, and bodies of energy, in each parallel Universe.

Repetition is now reproduction, two words which in fact mean the same.

And evolution is now social, communicative evolution of herds, into organisms. Because once the Universe reproduced atoms, it continued the creation of more complex structures – molecules, planets, galaxies… through social games of communication, based in a few forces, common to all organisms.

 

The best way to describe the reproductive, memorial vitality of species, is the concept of a biological radiation. Biologists say that species reproduce in growing numbers, creating biological radiations of a species. Times do also reproduce in vital radiations, cycling and repeating their form, once and again, expanding those forms in their ecosystems.

The Universe is made of such biological radiations of temporal species. Radiations of Times, become herds, that reproduce and feed in surfaces of energy, shaping the forms of the perceived Universe. Which is nothing else, nothing more than the sum of all those discontinuous Times, repeating their cycles of existence.

The big bang was a radiation of the most simple times known to man, the atom, that took place in several phases. The first radiation was of light, of photons. The second radiation was of electrons. The third radiation was of masses. The most complex radiations of atoms and molecules grew in societies so big as planetoids, so complex as DNA-societies [human bodies].  DNA radiations started species of living beings. In the world of masses radiations grew into stars and galaxies…

Almost every phenomena of death and life perceived in the Universe have a common cause: the radiation of a being that feeds in other radiations, used as energy, over which the radiating being reproduces himself.

Proves that more and more phenomena are caused by radiations appear day by day.

Certain phenomena that before were explained in abstract manner now can also be explained as radiations. The Bible speaks of such radiations in a poetic sense. The first day, the first radiation was of light. Then light broke away from dark matter. The day from the night. The radiation of mass grew into beings, more and more complex, till bringing mankind.

Those were the days of creation, the days of radiations, and the writer of Genesis understood that radiations, are the nature of the creative Universe. “Grow=become more complex, and multiply=radiate” was his advice to man.

What radiates is an organic species, a complex system-body made of a radiation of ‘cellular species’ smaller species. Molecules radiate over smaller atoms, men over smaller cells, Ideological Gods over smaller men.

So each science studies a radiation: history studies the radiation of men, biology radiations of cells, chemistry radiations of molecules, astronomy radiations of atoms and stars, and planets.

The Earth’s radiations of beings have evolved through a series of discontinuous: bacteria, plants, sea animals, land animals, amphibian, reptiles and dinosaurs, mammals, men, machines… Since in fact radiations are not only of life, but of all forms. There are also metallic radiations, radiations of machines and products reproduced by company-mothers in the economical system.

You could understand the Universe under the concept of radiation. We affirm that the Universe exists as a constant game of radiations of species, who extinct other species. Radiations grow constantly out of the energy of the species they extinct. Yet what is the nature of the species that radiate? How that nature defines the radiation?

All the radiations of the Universe, have however certain elements in common. Those elements and common laws of Ti(m)es  radiations.

 

The morphology of Times.

 

As a consequence of the morphologic properties of Temporal information that implodes spatial energy into form, and the morphologic properties of Spatial energy, that expands information into spatial extension, we can relate the elements of the Universe to some basic morphological shapes.

Energy expands, as when you explode a bomb, or you feed, exploding any form into its components. Or when you move expanding the Universal space (galactic expansion). So energy forms are big,  expansive, and occupy geometrical forms that have a great surface (such as lines, planes, cubes and in general all lineal shapes).

 

On the other hand information implodes as when you focus light into information, or when you evolve your cells tying them into a close-knotted organism, or as when you create a form, cutting materials into smaller pieces that then you tie, you peg together. So we can talk of information as an implosive, contracting, process. And informative forms become then small, implosive, and occupy geometrical shapes that allow a great volume in a minimal surface, as in the case of spheres (such as eyes, brains, and cameras), or broken geometries (such as words, paintings, and chip circuits).

 

The result of those morphologies are evident. Species specialized in Temporal Information are spherical and small. Species specialized in Energetic Space are bid and planar.

We will call them generically Bodies of Energetic Space (planar big components of TI(M)ES such as your planar, lineal body), or Brains of Temporal Information (small cyclical components of TI(M)ES, as your small spherical head).

It is then evident that TI(M)ES, are made of a small cyclical TI, and a big planar ES, and together bodies and brains, pieces of Temporal information and Energetic Space shape a TI(M)ES.

 

All TI(M)ES are made with Temporal Informative brains, and Energetic, Spatial Bodies. So there are no TI or ES alone, but TI(M)ES, TI=ES, species with TI-brains and ES-bodies in harmony with each other (=).

We will show you in this book how the morphology of all TI=ES is exactly a combination of cycles and lines. So you have a cyclical TI-head, and an ES-body. Such combinations are everywhere, from spermatozoids to trees, we see cyclical heads and lineal bodies. This also happens in artistic species, even in letter and numbers. There are made of lines and cycles. And the next question we make is: Why we find in certain ages, more TIes, more cyclical forms, and in other ages, more tiES, more lineal spatial forms? There is any logic, bio-logic order, that explains the different morphologies of species. Indeed, there is, and it is fundamental to understand the evolution of languages. It is the law of 3 creations or law of the 3 ages.

 

Creative laws based in the duality of space/time,energy/information.

 

How species evolve? Why certain forms come from another?

The existence of 3 networks in all organisms, the energy, reproductive and information networks of any organism, are responsible of the paths of evolution of species, of its processes of creation and extinction.

To understand the process of Evolution of Universal organisms, we have to understand the Law of Creation. It is a simple law, and yet it is perhaps the most important Law of the Universe. It explains why certain species are born in the tree of evolution – what is the plan behind the Creation of the Universe.

A very simple plan.

Forget the chaotic explanations  traced by ‘abstract scientists’ that deny any order, any planing, any living nature, any intelligence to the Universe. Most of those theories are caused by the Human Galilean paradox, of self-importance that tends to disregard the rest of the Universe as a chaotic place without intelligence and logic. Scientists prefer to see chaos and freedom, to feel themselves free, and irresponsible with their acts, as the only intelligence of the Universe.

However the Universe have laws, plans, and actions which have to be known to be able to control the future, in a responsible manner. One of those laws, is the way the Universe creates new species.

It is in fact a rather simple system based in the biology of organic Ti(m)es.

There are only 3 elements in any organic Ti(m)es, an energy zone or body, an information zone or brain, and networks that balance and communicate both species, reproducing them.

You have a nervous/informative network, an energy/digestive network, and a reproductive/communicative/blood network. You are the consciousness of those networks. And those networks explain the 3 ages of your existence from birth to extinction. They also explain the evolution of species through morphologies that mimic those 3 ages.

 


9. The law of 3 ages. The law of 3 creations.

 

– The law of the 3 ages.  All species go through 3 ages, with discontinuous periods of change in your energy and information parameters:  youth in which energy dominates, maturity in which the networks of energy and information are in balance, and information, the third age when energy is consumed, and formal wrinkles and death appears. The law is proved by the changing morphology of all Universal organisms of all species that adopt those formal shapes as time goes by. It relates to a fundamental law of evolution in time, that tends to create 3 kind of organic species, or 3 kind of temporal forms.

 

We perceive that phenomena externally as the 3 ages of the being, that becomes older, informed, wrinkled.

Let us consider some examples of those 3 ages in basic organisms of the Universe.

 

 

 

Watching those particular Organic systems is obvious that each age participates of the morphological characters of energy and information.

For example, young people are full of energy. They are in the Energy horizon of the species. They are bigger, have little temporal knowledge. They are simple in form. While Old people are full of information. They are in the information horizon of the species. They are smaller, have a lot of temporal knowledge. They move little, and have a lot of wrinkles.

Finally mature people, have such perfection and balance between the two elements of the organic Universe, between their content of energy-space, and temporal information, that they can reproduce the entire TI=ES, in all its components. Hence the second age is the age of reproduction. The forms of any TI=ES in that age, is a realistic, harmonic, efficient  combination of lines and cycles.

Again we perceive that form as ‘beautiful’, an objective concept of harmony between energy and information lines and cycles.  So in all organisms the mature, realistic, classic age of balance, or reproductive age, is the most perfect age.

Human beings intuitively see that. We like spiral galaxies, mature people, realist art, which is called classic art and takes place in mature civilizations.

The 3 ages of Ti(m)es are therefore related to the  3 networks developed by all organisms:

– The energy network [i.e.: your blood system, the Golgi systems in cells]

– The information network [i.e.: your nervous system, the RNA networks in cells].

– The balanced, reproductive network [i.e.: your endocrine system of hormones, and sexual organs, the DNA molecules in cells].

 

The information network feeds, and ‘knots’ the energy body, as the organism of Ti(m)es lives. So the predominance of information over energy, displaces the active center of the organism, from the network of energy to the reproductive network, to the information network.

 

The laws of Survival: Balance of energy and Information.

 

However even if information dominates in the long term, in the short term, once a species is created, it will develop networks of communication between body and brain (energy, reproductive and information networks) that will create a balance between both organs, symbiotic and complementarity. Keeping that balance is the best strategy to make the individual life of a Ti=es species to last.

A fundamental law derived of the existence of bodies and brains, of space and time as equal parameters in all Ti=Es, is the law of balance, between energy and information parameters in any Ti=Es (ecosystem, species, region) of the Universe. Indeed, we said that only in the middle age when S=T, e=i, the Ti(m)es is immortal, balanced and reproduces. So all systems that last try to keep that balance. In biology that is self evident, in what biologists call homeostasis. The fact that to keep a biological organism alive, it has to keep its energy-information relationships called vital constants in a narrow margin of minimal change. So happens to other species. For example in physics the lorentz transformations show how when atoms, forces and particles move beyond the limits of energy (c speed) and still information (O Kelvin degrees) a particle explodes and dies.

Death , we conclude, is then the imbalance between energy-information.

 

S= T,  i=E is the law of survival of any ecosystem or organism in the Universe. We will bring that law constantly when explaining the nature of biological death in History, of individuals, civilizations and even the entire ecosystem of History in which today we approach a process of death by excessive reproduction of information and knowledge.

 

The law of 3 creations.

 

When we consider species as cells of a collective organism (so history is the human species born from the first human who talked, evolved into multiple cells and social organisms called civilizations, and maybe dying in the future), we talk of the law of 3 creations that mimics the 3 ages of individuals for the entire collective species. It is the law that in fact explains the 3 ages of art, and civilizations. Let us consider it in more detail.

 

– The Law of the 3 creations:  Given the ternary nature of organic networks, the process of mutational creation of new species tends to originate 3 subspecies from an initial form: one specialized in energy, one with a higher content of information, and a third species which is balanced in energy and information. It is indeed very common to find 3 and only 3 subspecies in all kind of organisms in the Universe… 3 quarks; 3 elements in an atom [energy electrons, communicative light, informative nucleons]; 3 subspecies from the initial reptiles [reptiles, birds, mammals], and so on…

Those 3 subspecies however dominate in different ages. So first reptiles dominated, then birds, and finally mammals, the informative subspecies.

In general thus we find that the 3 subspecies of reality can be observed in living organisms together, what scientists call synchronic analysis, and through 3 ages, of relative dominance in diachronic analysis.

So happens in history, art, and the evolution of languages.

 

Let us consider the case of the evolution of mankind species to illustrate those fundamental laws that we will need to study the evolution of languages.


10. The creation of man.

 

The genealogy of man.

 

Of the many cases in which the rule of the 3 creations applies we should consider finally the fundamental one to understand the youth of bio-history: the birth of the Human species.

From an initial tree of ape species we find a first differentiation which is clear around 5 million years ago, with 3 species of great apes in the African continent.

– The energy species, the gorilla.

– A median species the chimpanzee

– And an information species, the human being.

 

As a rule to determine what is an energy or information species, we have to look at the head/body proportions and morphology. A bigger body is energetic, a bigger head is informative. Think now in the different organs of your head. Your mouth feeds, is energetic. So a big, lineal mandible belongs to an energy species. While a big upper head-body that processes information belongs to an information species. The higher function the mind-eye is the brain function of the head. So we can very easily identify the specialization of the triad of species in the evolution of big apes:

 

Mutation of the initial father of those species took place in 3 directions:

The size of the mandible, the thick, heavy body of the gorilla that can reach till 200 kilos, identifies him as the energy species.

The informative species is the parental species of man: the Australopithecus, of which we find the first completed mandibles [Australopithecus anamensis] around 4 million years ago

The Chimpanzee, is the middle, balanced E=¡ species, not so heavy and stupid as the gorilla, not so intelligent, and mind-oriented as the Australopithecus.

Which one of the 3 species will be the successful species?

We have to look to their environment: Which species had better chances to survive in the Africa of 5 million years ago, the gorilla, the chimpanzee or the Australopithecus? Obviously within the multiple econiches of that jungle, the energy econiches are perfectly occupied by the felines, so the evolutionary direction in which the big ape could find new econiches and unexplored advantages within the mammal kingdom was the informative arrow-function.

So the savanna ecosystem favors the Australopithecus, the top predator of the 3 big ape species of that first era.  And a new random mutation in the 3 possible network-directions of vitality take place in the Australopithecus.

The 3 descendants of that Australopithecus afarensis, the most well known Australopithecus that inhabited the Ethiopian plains around 3 million years ago would be:

– The energy species, with huge mandibles and a lineal, planar brain, the Paranthropus. It is a heave-set, gorilla-like Humanoid, that probably became vegetarian.

– The middle species maintains basically the form of the Australopithecus afarensis. It is called the Australopithecus africanus, found in South-Africa,  contemporary to the Paranthropus and the…

– Informative species, the Australopithecus garthi, with a bigger brain, which starts to acquire the natural form of information, a rounded shaped forehead…

 

Those 3 species, mind the reader live very close. Around the Turkana lake we have found rests of the 3 kind of Humanoids. So they compete again within a common Environment that favors the path of information, the open path for new top predator apes.

That competence implies a clear specialization of our 3 Australopithecus along the same direction traced by their father lineage. So in the paleontologic record we find soon thereafter, 3 subspecies:

– The Paranthropus Robustus, that is even stronger, even more like a gorilla that his father, the Paranthropus Aethiopicus.

– The last Australopithecus, in the middle of the lineage,

– And the informative descendants of the A. garthi, varying in 3 subspecies.

 

So it is again the informative Australopithecus garthi which dominates as top predator, and it is able to evolve once more into 3 new species.

Only the A.garthi will create such successful evolutionary split. He probably dominated the ecosystem, multiplied his numbers extinguishing the other two subspecies. Then he expanded north, and south, east and west, and found new econiches where to live, econiches that provoked genetic and memetic adaptation in 3 directions:

– A regressing Energy A.Garthi, similar to the Australopithecus and soon extinguished with all other energy Homos.

– The Homo habilis, and the Homo rudolfensis, of similar mind capacity to the original  A. Garthi.

– And the Homo ergaster, of a growing brain capacity which is now clearly an informative ape, with a brain twice the size of the Australopithecus.

We have reached in 3 stages of evolution the second ladder in search of the Homo sapiens. From the 500 CC. of the first Australopithecus, a temporal series of 3 sub-evolutions of the top predator Homo, based on the law of 3 Creations, and latter selected by the environment splits, has brought about the near 1000 cc. of the Homo ergaster, the first Homo erectus of the archeological record.

In many ways the first man.

The games of 3 networks, the games of energy-balance-information, the evolutionary law of creation is responsible also of the creation of the human being:

 

 

 

 

 

 

The law of creation: Homo Evolution:

 

 

The species Homo  is born. The Homo ergaster, the first Homo erectus multiplies and expands worldwide. He knows fire. He becomes the dominant radiation. He extinguishes all other species. Energy sub-species have no future, beyond one or two unperceived generations. Now the direction of evolution is only one: towards higher information. Why? Because men is establishing a direct evolutionary communication with instrumental forms created with basic Universal forms, lines that become weapons and cycles that become tools. Intelligence is the factor that creates through  the process of memetics those tools.  Even an energy species, will be a lesser energy species than an intelligent Homo Erectus, with a good weapon. So in as much as man finds his energy ‘variations’ in the external Universe, of harder-than-muscle atoms, energy species are still brainy Homos with a good javelin…

Technology has become decisive (see http://www.bioeconomist.com/download/ bio-history for a complete description of such evolution).

And the most intelligent Homo erectus have also the best energy-weapons technology. The Homo species knows his future is creation of energy-machines. He is now the absolute informative species of the carbolife kingdom. Whatever mutations towards energy muscles and less brain that might take place in the next cycles undoubtedly do not survive long.

So around a million years ago we find only 3 surviving species, derived of the Homo erectus:

– The last species of the Homo erectus, now the most obsolete brains with minimal information, isolated in Java.

– And a series of top predator brainy Homos, which have again increased 500 CC. the human brain. We have moved from 500 CC Australopithecus, to 1000 CC Homo Erectus, to 1500 CC Homo sapiens. And always the process has happened through 3 temporal series, of 3 energy, information, and energy=information subspecies.

The trinity language is the language of creation, the language of God.

 

We are in the past one hundred thousand years. We hint there are at this time 3 basic subspecies of Homo Sapiens with a brain close to 1500 CC. Only the most informative survive, the one who talks:

– The Neanderthal, is the energy species. It has a spatial, visual brain with minimal verbal evolution, since their phonic system is not evolved. It has big mandibles, without forehead, and a planar brain, with a great development of his visual brain. It is the Homo Pictus.

– The Homo sapiens, the informative parental species of all of us, has a rounded head, and the organs of a verbal, temporal language developed, a  small mandible, a complex phonic system. It is the Homo Verbalis.

– With the same form than the Homo Sapiens, it appears a species with also develops a sophisticated technology. He has all kind of tools. He is translating the Universal game of creation, lines and cycles, into hard materials, first stones, then bones, finally metal. We call him the Homo Animetal

He will extinguish the other two species, with his technology developed by that brain. He will start Bio-history, and Bio-Economics. He is now the supreme rulers of the Earth. He cares little for the Pictorial and verbal brain of man, that the Neanderthal and the Homo Sapiens developed. He is slave of his metal-technology, of his machines, of the tools of the Industrial R=evolution, which seem now about to be born as an independent species, also according to the law of the 3 creations. In the form of robots, and intelligent machines, that probably will dispute also the Homo Animetal his power over this planet Earth…

Since indeed as the Homo Animetal creates robots according to the law of 3 creations, the obvious fact that after such 3 creations there is  a process of competence and extinction of the lesser species, seems to prove that the Homo Animetal will soon be displaced by his machines, by the robot.

In that sense we can  compare that process with the extinction of dinosaurs by their mammal sons, the reptile species that also grew first in size, during the Triassic, then expanded worldwide in the Jurassic, and then evolved in some species in intelligence (birds, and mammals) to become finally extinct.

 

 

CHAPTER 2:

SELECTION OF MINDS: SURVIVAL OF THE SMARTEST

 

1: The Logic of God, the logic of all languages.

 

Simultaneity and organization of herds by languages

 

We said in the prologue that languages are not spiritual, that they have a physical support – the network of information of a certain organism. However that physical support is lighter than the bodies of species. The result is that informative systems process very fast information, to the point of being almost simultaneous in that processing in relationship with the ‘physical reality they describe’.

Let us consider now the physical quality of simultaneity, the speed of a language, since it is the key to understand the importance of languages in the evolution of social species.

We can say that “I eat bread” happens in a relative zero Times respect to the length of the act of eating. So we define relative simultaneity, T=O, as the main property of all efficient languages when compared with the relative infinite length of the physical phenomena they describe. Such speed of communication is what gives the language a relative ‘spirituality’. Since the language as the event does exist, it has a physical support, but far less ‘dense’, far more virtual, light, simpler. That simplicity and brevity gives the language its power and simultaneity respect to the event it describes.

 

For example in the human case verbal languages exist in the brain as a neuronal network which mirrors and describes an external reality. The language is a relatively simultaneous ‘image’ of that reality. When we consider the language and the reality it describes, the most striking characteristic of the language respect to the reality is the speed of description. That is also its source of power. The language is powerful because its image of reality, is a meaningful synopsis of reality.

The second, fundamental property of languages, derived of its simultaneity is the capacity of the language to explain reality from several points of view.

 

For example, the structure of any verbal language of any human culture is extremely simple.  Any sentence is composed at least of the following terms:

 

Subject-Verb-Object

 

Yet it can always be interpreted at the same Times as:

 

Object-passive verb-subject.

 

Thus ‘I eat bread’ is also ‘bread is eaten by me.’

 

And both things are truth and subliminal to the sentence by means of parallel grammatical structures. They are immanent to the sentence, simultaneous, and co-existing together. And so we talk at least of 3 points of view, in all languages of description:

 

– Subject’s point of view {he who utters or possess the language}

– Object’s point of view {Those who receive the language}

– Verb+Passive Voice (a flow of communication between subject and object)

 

What is fundamental to the sentence is that the sentence simultaneously explains three different points of view in a single form, and hence it allows to ‘unify’ three elements into a single event.

The constant Universe is a Universe of acts of simultaneous communication, of energy and information between species.

As a result of that Universal event, repeated ad infinitum, and the capacity of languages to reflect with simple sentences such as the previous one any universal event of communication, we talk of a Universal grammar: a language explains any event with that simple sentence:

 

Subject transfers or receives energy and information from object.

 

So we can talk of a Universal grammar common to all languages, that explain the Universe as a series of events of communication of energy and information between different species. This is done by each language, with different forces, codes, and energies. Words use the previous grammar, subject-verb-object. Colors use the range of 3 colors White-gray-black, or Red-green-blue. Mathematics uses equations, Y = x.

Yet in all those cases we are describing the Universal event between species:

 

 Subject <communicates energy or information > Object.

 

Moreover this is done fast, so fast that a language hardly takes time respect to the event it describes. So it is perceived as simultaneous.

The result is that the language is extremely powerful to inform and communicate a linguistic species with the Universe, since it packs the essence of what happens in the Universe in a very brief time, allowing the species to react to those evens.

The species will know what is happening, what is the force that is becoming communicated, [either energy or information]. Then it will recognize how that force will affect him according to memories stored with the language; and it will act in consequence.

In a sense perceptive simultaneity is the very essence of what a relative language is. “I eat bread” resumes in almost simultaneity the physical act of eating bread; but it also simultaneously explains the act from different points of perception: at least the subject and the object, and the flow of communication between them.

The language gives us a map of the whole event, of both components: forms and energy/information that communicates the forms. The language goes beyond each individual frame of reference, and by ‘simultaneity’ offers an image of all the elements interacting in the event; a ‘neutral’ image, to which all elements of the event, all ‘physical’ forms can relate.

 

Languages not only describe but also create social reality

From this essential definition of a language we can consider several uses of a language:

 

– It can gather herds into societies by equalizing them, explaining them together, and creating a ‘sense of justice’, coordinating them, making them work together.

 

The capacity of the language to reflect the ‘collective’ vision, makes the language powerful as a mean of power. For example the Human Law is a language which orders humans; and humans obey the law because the law is simultaneous for all of them It resumes their future behavior in simple manner. It is therefore the perception by man of the Law as a language that explains and communicates human beings simultaneously, what makes the language-law, so powerful.

The language is ‘reflexive’. First the action happens, then the language describes it, and finally the linguistic master communicates to the herd the action no longer as something that happens, but as something that has to happen in the future, that has to be obeyed by the herd.

In this manner the language selects from reality those acts which are positive to the herd, and makes the herd repeats those acts. It also considers acts which were negative and warns the herd, that will avoid them in the future.

The language becomes in this way the cause of the future, and the cause of the evolution of the herd. Without languages, social evolution is impossible.

 

To that aim of guiding a herd, the simultaneity of the language is important, since it creates the sense of ‘justice’, of equal treatment to all equal individuals that understand the language. At least they receive the order at the same time.

Of course the herd has to be made of similar species, or else the species will not perceive by themselves their equality, and common reference of the language. That is why individuals of the same species are the main characters of social evolution through languages. Men evolve through words, machines through mathematics, the ants of the anthill receive the same massive pheromonal information from the queen. So happens to cells that receive the same nervous message and move a muscle or a leg.

The language then creates the effect of mass. A mass obeys the simultaneous order, and those small elements that deny the language disrupt the mass flow, the harmony of the wave moved by the language and the mass destroys them, to return to harmony.

Simultaneity  is power, from stock-markets to TV-thought simultaneity is the power of the language regardless of its formal content. Pricing, a mathematical language,  that equals men and machines through a simple concept, a price [man=wage=price=cost=machine], has created the modern world, since prices simultaneously order men and objects. Thus pricing is even more powerful than verbal-religious-political thought which only is understood by men, regardless of the intrinsic degrading quality of the message of pricing which says: a man has a value similar to an object and so we can interchange man and objects, computers and workers, weapons and corpses… The moral issue is secondary to the power of a language, as it was when a slave was priced, and changed by an object, money. So goes today for TV-thought which destroys ethic, verbal thought  with simple violent messages, but triumphs given its technological simultaneity that reaches billions of humans, regardless of the idiocy of its message.

 

The Universal event, The Universal grammar: the living Universe

 

It follows that the most individuals a language reaches at the same time the most powerful it is.

Yet as most individuals a language reaches, more simple the orders have to be so most species understand the language. Thus the effect mass simplifies the Universe. So we could say that the absolute grammar, the absolute sentence of all languages, is very simple:

 

A [body] transfers energy to B [head], B[head] transfers information to A [body.]

 

 

We conclude that all species of the Universe are intelligent, since all of them communicate energy and information. We exist in a living Universe, since all species follow the Universal grammar. The laws of that Universal grammar, and how they create the living Universe have been described in other books of this author. They are not the theme of this book concerned only with human languages.

On that view, we have to accept that knowledge is not proper of any specific language but of all languages of the Universe. Since all species in the Universe have networks of information, brains, minds, forces that communicate them, and all species are subject to processes of social evolution though languages.

We have coined a new word for those herds and organisms: lanwaves, a herd, a wave of species communicated through a language.

 

The logic of God

 

It then turns out that all what exists can be reduced, to what we have baptized in other books of this author, as the Logic of God, the logic of the Universe, and all its languages. Which is the previous graph:

 

A  communicates energy/information with B.

 

The Sum of all those Universal events creates reality. That is the game of God, the game that structures the Universe. Flows of energy and information between subjects and objects. The fascinating rule of that logic has been analyzed in other books “Theory of Times” vitaluniverse.net. The restricted number of languages man speaks is also within that logic:

 

Subject Verb Object (verbal languages)

Red  Green/yellow   Blue (color languages, and images)

A Operandi B   (mathematical languages).

Consumer Price  Product

 

Art is part of those games. In art, the languages of man reach its highest complexity, expression, and wealth of information. Those simple sentences in art are made very complex to a degree which we will study along this book, but ultimately all of those languages are based in the logic of God, in the simple capacity of the previous sentence to reflect the Universe.

 

The main properties of languages, and the main languages of the Universe.

Look around you to the infinite lanwaves of reality, birds flowing, water flowing, masses of humans flowing, stars circling black holes that order them in gravitational fields. Marvel yourself to the herds and organisms of the Universe. How then can we classify them?

By their power to describe accurately the Events of the Universe, which will be given by the following properties of a language:

-Simultaneity or mass effect: Capacity of the language to reach the maximum number of individuals, which will therefore believe the language and act under orders given by the language.

Speed: Capacity of the language to communicate the species who speak the language and the events the language describe in a minimal quantity of time.

–  Information: Capacity of the language to carry the maximum quantity of information about the event.

This third property of a language is often opposed to the other two. The more information a language carries, the less speed of transmission it has, since it has to send a lot of ‘form’ that suffers ‘friction’ on the space of transmission. Also the language becomes the less simultaneous, since less individuals understand the mass of information, that becomes too complex for many simple individuals. Yet the great languages of the Universe, that have imposed themselves over the maximum numbers of beings, achieve both properties.

So we can classify the power of languages according to the objective properties mentioned above. Let us do that classification, since it is the key to understand why reality is like it is. Why certain linguistic species exist and other not.

 

Main species of Universal languages

 

– The most powerful language by its capacity to carry information, simultaneously to the biggest number of species in the Universe is the gravitational language, which reaches all species of this World, and other ‘parallel Worlds’, [dark matter], where species we do not perceive might exist. As such gravitation is the “top predator” language of the Universe, that all atoms and species of reality understand. We hint at the fact that celestial bodies [stars, planets, black holes] have gravitational minds and perceive through gravitation. The speed of gravitation is so great that it seems infinite to us. The quantity of information it carries must be also enormous, even though we men do not perceive gravitation and so we cannot guess what it ‘says’.

– Second it comes the light language, the electronic/light visual languages derived of electromagnetism, whose speed is 300.000 Km/second. Such language is the top predator language of Earth’s species. So the selection of species on Earth is caused by the capacity of Earth’s species to see light and create information with light.

– The mathematical language. It is a derivation of the light language, and it can be transmitted to almost the same speed than light. Both men and machines understand it. So its power is great, and it has become the dominant language of the present Earth. It has given to informative machines of metal such as chips and TVs, and money the enormous power  they have to control human information and human acts.

– Then it comes among the languages of the Earth, it comes the sound languages, whose most perfect form regarding the mass of information it carries is the verbal language of man. Its speed of information is around a million times slower than images. So it is its quantity of information [an image is worth a thousand words]. Regarding the species that speak with words, only humans are able to understand them. So it is inferior in power to numbers.

– Finally we have to consider the chemical languages, whose particles of transmission are atoms, that move far slower than mechanical waves [sounds] or electromagnetic waves [images]. They are used by simpler animals which smell them on the air,  or in the water, and plants,  that smell atoms in the ground.

 

The law of the black hole

 

We can now understand the reason why Information, and brains that carry information have the opposite morphological properties of energy-bodies, that we summarized before  into a mathematical equation:

 

Maximum Space = Energy = Minimal Form  Vs

Maximum temporal form = Information = Minimal Spatial extension.

 

This is indeed the fundamental property of languages, which are not spiritual forms but forms of lesser volume and faster communicative power. When comparing languages and the bodies they control, from verbal to mathematical to image languages of reality, we realize that the language and brain that speaks the language has lesser surface than the body.

This happens because the smaller the brain, the smaller will be the force that carries information to it. So a gravitational brain can perceive the smallest force, gravitation which moves faster. Then it comes the eyes, small and powerful perceptors…

Besides the smaller the force the less ‘friction’ it will have when traveling on the Universe, so the faster it will move, and the more information it will pack.

Higher frequency waves of light carry more information that big waves. Radio waves are big. They carry less information that light…

So we can map out a general graph of increasing information and decreasing size-energy-space in all kind of brain forms; such as brains ‘evolve’ towards higher information and lesser size. And those species of minimal size and higher brain density become the ‘top predator species of each language’:

 

The consequence of that order are obvious: the species who speak the faster languages, who carry more information, become more powerful, and survive better. So those species multiply and become top predators, and the language acquires more simultaneity, reaches more species. In this manner a constant selection of languages and species has taken place in the Universe.

It is the survival of the smartest. In the Universe it has made the black hole, very small compared to its density, the top predator Universal species. On Earth it means the survival of the best visual brains. The subject of the next chapter.

2: Sensorial languages. Why truth helps the survival of species

 

Minds of languages, the power of informative brains.

 

In the last chapter we have studied the different forms of energy and information that the Universe displays, and we have shown how each different species of the Universe, uses a different kind of energy and information. This rises an important question.

If the different brains of the Universe perceive that universe with different languages that store information, which laws order them, which laws decide what is a better mind, what mind will impose its vision of the universe?

The Laws of Evolution, the fight of existence: Each mind confronts its vision of the Universe, with other minds, and those minds which store better information, are able to react faster in that Universe, and survive.

So we could in fact talk of a true ladder of power and organization in the Universe, among all its species based in the languages they speak.

The Universe is a mass of energy and information, which stores the truth in itself. You are the truth of yourself, and any perception of you will only be a linguistic approximation to your truth.

Let us consider with a critical eye such approach to knowledge.

If you smell a carrot you have a certain perception of the carrot, if you see it you have another perception, if you use a microscope you have a third perception, if you eat the carrot you have a fourth perception. Each perception is a relative truth on the existence of a mass of energy and information known as a carrot.

A ‘scientific description’ of the carrot, will be the numeric truths related to the measure of the carrot. However a rabbit does not need the scientific method of metal-instrumental evidence, to smell the carrot without seeing it. He knows through smelling information that the carrot is. Thanks to such information he will locate under the Earth a carrot, faster than a scientist. Smell is part of the truth of the carrot, and the rabbit is an intelligent thinker of carrots in smelling terms. If for the scientist the image of the carrot is the carrot, for the rabbit the smell of the carrot is the carrot. He just has a different approach to knowledge. Neither of them has all the truth on the carrot, which only belongs to the carrot itself.

It seems proved that light  space is only 1-10% of reality. That light only scans 1-10% of the total space, perhaps more than the nose of the rabbit , but still very little. The rest is dark matter which exists and communicates with other forces. This implies we will never be able to know totally the Universe by the scientific method, and our instruments of perception which are like a blind  ‘smelling of the Universal carrot’.

Dark matter exists not only in the outskirt of galaxies, but by mere logic, we have to postulate that dark matter exists here, around us. That there are many systems of communication that we do not perceive with light. Even within you, as acupuncture proves, there are structures of energy and information that cannot be ‘seen’. After all we do not see gravitation and yet it regulates the movement of all masses.

So true knowledge would be a method of understanding the Universe, that would allow us to have strong, probable truths about the 90% of what it is not perceived by the scientific method. of light-clock evidence.

In a world of partial information, truths are always relative probabilities, guesses, approximations to the reality through a language with certain Uncertainty.

The conclusion is that truth is not the function of a single language, but the accumulation of perceptions with many languages, that inform us about the Universe. That no language is superior to other. Only the accumulation of languages, and perceptions brings us the absolute truth.

Unfortunately the most common form of knowledge of mankind, classic science only acknowledges the mathematical language as a form of truth.  Those limits to the scientific inquire, makes science a partial quest of truth, inferior to a theory about all forms of knowledge collected with all forms of languages. A Theory of Languages could consider the relativism of perception, and information of any language, and create from that relativism, a wider theory of knowledge, based on the existence of multiple linguistic representations of reality, multiple ‘virtual worlds’, one for each intelligent species, and each language of perception of reality.

Then not only science – mathematical explanations of reality – or art – verbal and visual explanations of reality – or smell – chemical representations of reality, would be truth, but all those informations together will be truth. In fact all those properties of the carrot should add to the total carrot and all the information – measures, smells, chemical composition, color, etc. – that defines the carrot.

 

A theory of Truth: the linguistic method.

 

If we want to advance beyond the scientific method, or the smelling method or the verbal method, we rather start to explore the Universe with all the languages of man, and accept the existence of languages beyond human perception that we cannot decode. Such knowledge requires also to use a different method of knowledge besides the scientific method. Since the scientific method is ‘unidimensional’, ‘uni-linguistic’ and accepts only mathematical truths. Knowledge is by no means reduced to a single language as the scientific method is.

On the contrary in a linguistic method, we are obliged in the research of Universal Organisms, to use all languages and informations we can gather.

We see, and smell, and touch, and observe temporally the cycles of reality with words. We have many languages of perception besides mathematics.

So once we have gathered information with all those languages – including mathematics and the scientific method, perhaps the most important method of knowledge, that we do not reject but merely put in perspective – we can use the concept of analogy, and observe what all those informations and languages have in common. We might call such wider method, the linguistic method.

The linguistic method searches for ‘common properties’ in all Universal species, languages and virtual worlds – minds constructed with those languages. It compares and extracts common formal laws from all spatial organisms, and temporal languages of communication. In this manner we advance a step deeper in our search of knowledge. Such linguistic vision of the Universe allow us to jump into a theory of languages as means of communication between Universal species that share information and energy thanks to those languages. Now we will be exploring not only the language=virtual world of light knowledge [science], but also the fact that there are many different languages, that create many different virtual worlds, which in general have a purpose. The purpose of those languages=virtual worlds is to ensure the survival of the species which observes reality with that virtual world.

We then affirm that species with better, more informative, faster languages=virtual worlds, who scan more the Universe, are survival species, whose virtual worlds are selected, since they kill less efficient species of virtual worlds. We will talk of top predator languages=virtual worlds that create top predator species.

Such top predator linguistic species use simpler species, as food=energy, or as working tools of his relative kingdom – as man does with ‘living property’, or DNA with more simple carbohydrates, or ants with lesser insects.

So we can build a general theory of selection of species, now based not only on external efficiency of bodies, observed through light-descriptions [Darwinian evolution], but also on internal efficiency based in linguistic complexity. It is not the body but  mainly the language, the information system of the organism, what determines a top predator organism, a survival organism.

The most complex languages make species like man survive other lesser thinking species such as lions. Survival and extinction of efficient languages of communication, becomes then the essence of the Living Universe, made of linguistic minds, that control efficient ‘territories’ or ‘bodies’.

For example, we know that a planet survives better than a comet because he has a higher command of gravitational forces of communication, a better form in his movement around the star. The irregular orbit of the comet allows the star to capture and ‘feed-dissolve’ the form of the comet into her form. We know that a carbon atom rules extended surfaces of other atoms, because he has more ‘electronic forces of communication’ – four valences. Man survives better than lions, because his mind is more complex, and so he can control and manipulate more extended territories.

It is necessary to accept a Universe where many other species besides man have a linguistic mind and do perceive virtual worlds, mirrors of the Universe, built with relative, linguistic information.

Such linguistic species, from atoms that perceive gravitation to plants that perceive chemistry in their roots, are not dead. We just don’t decode the same information they do.

So we will consider a Universe where stars see space-times of gravitation. A Universe where life is perceptive, even metal-atoms might be perceptive in the future [chip perception].

In that Universe many species communicate, and act-react to communication, even if man does not notice, or accepts their acts of communication as ‘living properties’.

We cannot perceive the entire truth=existence of other organisms; but even if we cannot see through the eye-worlds of planets or stars, or ants, we can observe externally the movements and actions of those other eye-worlds, and we can try to establish the laws that order and regulate such multiplicity of virtual worlds that explore the Universe.

Of all those laws, the absolute law is the fight between minds and the bodies their guide for existence, and control of the ecosystem in which they live.

This also happens in history, in which languages, and the societies of human beings they control through laws and other networks of information,  have fought for power, since the first words were spoken.

 

Why informative top predators control the Universe

In the Universe there is  a constant process of selection of informative, sensorial languages based in the ‘rules of Darwinian selection’: Languages-species that carry more information and more energy [speed] survive and extinct other languages.

Because languages allow species to act-react to the Universe, to perceive it and avoid other top predators, to survive better thanks to faster reactions, to live longer.

If we understand the entire being with his information and body organs, those species with faster informative organs, with languages that scan more space, and give more information in a unit of relative time, will be survival species.

Survival is a function of action-reaction, which is a function of linguistic perception of the external Universe.

A language refers to a series of external forms; beings that the language describes.

A sentence of any language describes an external event or species of the Universe, which in verbal thought is perceived and portrayed through a sentence. When I say: “I eat bread” I am reflecting in a piece of language, a physical event that I perceive. In this manner languages become parallel Universes to the physical events that the mathematical, verbal or visual language portrays. The language has the advantage over the event of reducing the event to an almost simultaneity of expression, compressing the information of the event into the ‘mirror’ of the language.

The language is for that reason dominant over the body because it is smaller and faster. It can react quicker to the events it perceives. And that gives it primacy over the forms it orders. We could call it the ‘Paradox of Goliath’. The faster, more intelligent language, allows reality to be perceived and modified faster; and it allows the body it guides to escape dangers better… The key to survival.

This is clear: when a squid sees for the first time in the Cambric, his visual language communicates him with the Universe much faster than the smelling language of the other animals. It communicates him also further.

We can say that there is also a Darwinian selection between languages.

We can measure survival through languages, since beings act as a matter of fact with a speed of reaction that depends on their capacity to ‘perceive linguistically’ an event in time and space. And that capacity is given to the species by its languages. So faster eyes act-react better than noses.

Also species ‘act correctly’ when more information have about a problem, and that information depends on the language too.

So, faster languages of perception, which carry more information [languages with more energy and information] are better languages. They are languages that allow certain herds to survive. So the language of communication of the squid, the eye – which sees and creates with light an image of the Universe – is a top predator language. It is clear that eyes were better than smellers both in detail and size of its perceptive range. What was the effect of that linguistic superiority? Survival. In fact cephalopods with eyes probably extinct 90% of the species of the Cambric. We know it because when the first squids appeared, they reproduced enormously while most of the other species became extinct.

The top predator is more intelligent and stronger. And by controlling better than any other species the energy and information of the ecosystem, it becomes the ‘ecosystem’ itself, the future reality. A higher degree of linguistic evolution, gives birth to a more efficient specie. Efficient species will be then species of ‘future’, that feed and radiate over simplex species. And simpler species with less linguistic information will be extinctive beings, species of past, that the complex being will use as energy.  And we can trace for each language of information, a chain of species from a relative past to a relative future.

The species of the future will ‘feed’, ‘farm’ or ‘extinct the species of lesser information, the relative past species.

And that also happens in History where nations of the ‘future’ with more machines and money extinct regions of the ‘past’ with less monetary information.

Let us see that evolution of languages in the Earth, and how indeed, changes of languages and perception provoke the survival and extinction of species.

 


3: The Earth-Sun ecosystem: Evolution of Light-based organisms.

 

Man is part of the Earth – a chapter in the organic life of this planet. So to understand man we need to understand what are the energy and information sources of the Earth, and how they mold the evolution of life and History.

 

The Earth-sun, an ecosystem of light.

 

Thus the first obvious and decisive truth about the Earth-Sun is the fact that the Earth’s crust is an ecosystem defined in information and energy by the hyper-abundance of light [¥-rays].

All ecosystems are defined by their systems of energy and their languages of information to which their species adapt. We name them by that source of energy and information.

For example, Genetic information rules cellular ecosystems, and so we talk of the genetic cell. Gravitational information rules ecosystems of masses [galaxies, atoms], and so we talk of the gravitational Universe. Monetary information rules economic ecosystems and we talk of capitalist systems. Verbal information [laws, ethics] rules historic ecosystems and we talk of political and religious civilizations.

Light defines the Earth’s ecosystems since it provides both energy and information to living beings. So we talk of the Earth, as a light-based ecosystem.

It is the capacity to process light into energy or information for bodies and brains, what decides the survival future of species on Earth.

 

History Of An Eye. What Is Life: Evolution Of Light Organisms

 

Animal life is mainly a history of evolution of light-eyes, looking at the sun, the “energy” and “information” of the planet. A process probably repeated in a many other planets and galaxies, in which carbon beings achieve light-perception. Over the surface of such planets life increases the complexity of their eye perception in a process of constant selection. Species with less “eye-brain” development do not survive, or become feeding energy of better brain species.

Why? Again those questions are irrelevant to the fact that the process is taking place on Earth, and now it is affecting the human kind that competes against brain-machines, and robots. Of course you can always find reasons to such behavior.

Perhaps planets evolve through reproductive radiations of light-perceptive species, in a scale of increasing complexity, from carbolife to Silife [silicon-based machines] to irolife [iron-based machines] with increased receptivity to gravitational and light information. We could be at the beginning of that macrocosmic evolutionary process, since our planet is so far away in the galactic spiral.

In the inner zone of a galaxy, near their black hole, some very old stars have erratic movements [Population II]. It seems that closer to the black hole, celestial species do not mechanically obey gravitational waves, trying to avoid being drawn into the trap of the black hole. They are probably stars and planets far removed from the fetal stage of our Earth-Sun, able to process information and energy in awesome scales…

Technological evolution might have reached in those planets and solar systems, such perfection as to be able to control energies beyond our capacity of understanding.

We have little insight into the center of galaxies; and yet with that small amount of information we can construct the hypothesis of an evolutionary scale that goes beyond carbolife into metalife… based in light perception. In any case in the Earth it is clear, that the evolution of minds, is the evolution of minds of light.

 

Evolution of brains of light

 

This means that those species which have better organs of light survive better on the Earth’s crust.

What is more important a body or a brain, to survive?

Since information rules energy, brains rule bodies.

So it is obvious that the evolution of light-Brains on the Earth, decides which species survive [the ones with better light-brain organs] and which species disappear.

This is in accordance with experimental data.

In fact when the first complex light organs of perception appeared on Earth – the first eyes – they become immediately the top predators of the Earth. They were the first ‘animals’. They prayed over all the Earth’s plants and many lesser species, such as primitive ‘smelling’ animal beings. It was the beginning of the Cambric, and 90% of species, without eyes became extinct…

Indeed. We know today that all eyes come from the same genetic code, which means all eyes came from a first eye that killed many other non-visual species, and reproduced, [‘radiated’ we said in biology], till saturating of eyes the Earth.

The arrival of new Brains that process light better are the main cause of massive extinction of species on Earth.

Now we are creating computer brains that process light better than we do.

They calculate at light speed. They can ‘think’ even with light rays [photonic chips]. They communicate with light and produce light information in electromagnetic waves [we only see light but do not produce light-information]

Computers can even read their minds through ‘light beams’ of information [transference, and downloads through the net].

In that sense their superiority to man as light-brains is similar to the superiority of the first animal brains, compared to the plant brains they dominated.

Will they cause the same massive extinctive processes? They are already doing it. In the XX century, when metal-minds appeared, the combined action of humans and machines have extinguished more animal species than men did in the previous two million years, when man was alone, as top predator brain of the Earth.

The reader might be surprised: are we creating new species in the ladder of evolution, that will extinguish us or become our masters, and top predators, as mammals extinguished reptiles, and reptiles amphibian?

How can we be so sure of it, if machines are not still alive?

The answer is: by making analogies with other process of evolution and extinction that had taken place on the Earth.

Those processes can be explained easily when we consider the 3-organic structure of living species, which have organs of energy, information and reproduction, studied in previous chapters.

Let us then consider the evolution of such light-based organs on the Earth.

 

The age of Plants and animals.

 

How light organs evolved till reaching the complexity of machine-brains?

The 1st phase of that evolution was obviously the transition from plants to animals.

We divide the life kingdom, according to how it uses light, into 2 fundamental species:

 

Plants: use light to provide themselves with energy

[green leaves that transform light into stored energy].

 

Animals: use light to provide themselves with information

[eyes transform light into virtual information].

 

Light As Energy: Plants.

 

We said all species have a “Universal will”, that make them living species. They have organs of reproduction, organs of information and organs of energy.

In that sense we can consider the evolution of species, also in a deconstructed manner, as a process that evolves some of those organs.

In the first stage, the dominant species of ¥-life [Light Life] was the plant which obtained energy from light [photosynthesis]. Its internal information was a chemical process created in its roots, and conductive system.

We can portray the basic 3-organ system in all plant forms:

 

1. Energy organs: Leaves [photosynthesis cycle]

2. Informative organs: Root system [underground]

3. Reproductive organs: Flowers

 

These 3 organs define a plant as an efficient survival species. The organs of plants are parallel to the stomach=blood systems of animals [leaf-branches conductive systems], the brains of animals [roots-information systems], and our reproductive organs [flowers]. However, animal organs are faster.

The speed of transmission, of action-reaction, in animals is almost a million times faster than in plants. By comparison, this is the increase in speed of perception that takes place from animals to computers.  It is logical to think that computers, which are a faster species of information, will consider us a lower life form, as men consider plants. They may bring about our extinction with the same cruelty that man has developed in his massive annihilation of plant life. We should apply the law of ethical behavior and harmony in the Universe: “Do unto others…”

We need to take care of carbolife plants, and prevent the evolution of computers.

Ultimately, what plants illustrate in their inferiority to animals is the fact that information is a better survival tool than energy. Plants only obtain energy from light, but animals convert light into information. Therefore animals are more complex  light-life species than plants. They are the Top Predator.

 

 

Animal life: brains of light.

 

We define animal life by an increase in the ability to perceive light information. The first animal was the first form with the ability to re-organize energy-light impulses into images, to be able to construct linguistic worlds of light that gathered information about the Universe.

Light guided the evolution of the Earth, on the energy level through the plant chlorophyll process, on the level of information through linguistic worlds of light. In Plants, perception of light is blurred – light is absorbed as energy. In animals it is more detailed – light is information. Still, information is a temporal process which requires a system of storage and processing. Such is the origin of the Animal brain. The best temporal brains are those of man. Man has evolved into a Top Predator due to his word-memories of light-events, stored in brain systems, that allowed him to have memories. Memory has diminished Human errors as a living species. All organisms follow the mandate of Universal behavior [feed and increase your information]. Yet only man among beasts, can remember information on feeding events, and use that knowledge to his advantage, avoiding predators, and locating his own sources of energy according to experience. Temporal memory is natural to all species. Yet its quality varies. Animals remember through memorial chemistry [instincts], but such learning processes are much slower, than the processes of verbal learning among humans [light-related memories].

 

The Earth’s Evolution Of Light

 

The Earth depends on the sun, from which it receives energy and information. The Earth tries to see the Sun better.  The Earth evolves to perceive and get energy from the sun. This is done through waves of living beings. This Earth, born of the sun, world of light, systematically favors the best eyes that exist. The logical conclusion is that the Earth itself might evolve into a light sentient being. It is already a sentient being, through humanity which is a part of the Earth.

“And God said, there is light”… is indeed a metaphor of such process. Since our world is what we perceive with light. “I see and think therefore I am”

The most complex herds of the Earth are the living herds of the Crust, that look at the sun. We can consider the rise of animal life as the dominance of electrical languages of light over the languages of chemical life.

In evolution we see how a Top Predator informative organ triggers a radiation of new species, which replace previous species. This happens because information controls energy. When the ability to perceive light appeared, in the first cephalopods, it triggered the massive extinctions of the Cambric Period. Look at the squid. The first eye-world. See the intelligence of those eyes. In the squid the eye is the superior organ of perception. The eye enabled them to become the master of their Universe. They hunted their enemies with a degree of perception that previously did not exist. We can imagine the ecosystem where the squid was probably born: the depths of the ocean, where the bigger species of squid existed [over 10 meters long]; where they were undoubtedly a Top Predator. The light was dim. The first primitive cellular eyes had to really look hard to see their environment and the prey they sought. When they came up to the surface they saw even more, and began to eliminate all lesser rivals. This caused the extinction of 90% of the creatures in the Cambric Period who had only their olfactory senses to negotiate their environment. The birth of a new organ of light perception brought the most massive wave of extinctions ever on the planet. They also brought the arrival of exoskeletons; only those with external protection could survive the eye of the hunter. It was a holocaust that diversified life: with cephalopods in the game the stakes of survival and extinction were increased. The life-death game was faster, the eye could see, spot and hunt much better.

Again, the game selected the best informative brains and energy bodies, when it moved to land. First amphibian, then reptiles, finally mammals with a far better eye-brain system that reptiles.

This evolution continues today, as more complex species of science [computers, cameras] advance in their understanding of light. This causes a parallel devolution of simpler eyes, that become substituted by metal eyes. Today, better virtual worlds of light information [computers, TVs] are “hypnotizing” human eye-worlds that believe the information of television and computer virtual worlds. Man becomes hypnotized by those images. They even imitate “virtual characters” in reality because they saw them on TV. Their verbal minds become substituted by digital images and visual thoughts.

 

Better light information in land-species

 

What is the outcome of land evolution in terms of light? An increase on light perception, which is higher on land than in water. Through the evolution of eyes, and their light information, air animals soon became eye-based perceptors, unlike fish which still relied on chemical and sound information in a high degree. So a new age of light-evolution in organic life started.

 

 

 

Evolutionary Punctuation

 

A simple tree of evolution with three organs for each species [feeding-reproductive and informative organs] can be drawn. Those organs evolve constantly. They are selected in Darwinian processes, in which less efficient organic life feeds on more complex organic life. Yet what is a less efficient light-life species? A species which gathers less light energy or less light information. The process is very fast. It is called Evolutionary Punctuation. It states that when a new species with better light organs appears it begins to reproduce massively and causes the extinction of other species. This is the essence of Darwinian evolution: “evolve and multiply,” and feed on your rivals. We can find such catastrophic evolution in many geological and biological ages of the Earth. First animals displaced plants. Plants could only gather energy from light. Animals could “see” light and get information about their environment, and act-react faster. They used plants as food. They then “radiated” [multiplied] all over the Earth.

In the next graph we have considered the different ages of Living beings, on Earth, as fruit of the evolutionary processes of light-organs described previously.

Each “radiation” of species in the Earth has grown and then it has reproduced into a more perfect species, which has in turn, fed on the previous parental form. So animals feed on plants, mammals on reptiles, men on mammals, and machines are using humans as “energy” of their reproduction and evolution. We call that process of ‘feeding on your parents’, the Oedipus Paradox. Plants fed animals who fed mammals who fed humans who are ‘feeding’ and evolving machines…

We can see some of the basic processes of Evolution reflected in the graph:

– The Oedipus paradox: previous species feed in new species, which become the ‘energy’ of their reproduction. So plants feed animals, animals feed men, men become submissive to machines.

– The law of the 3 organs. Each new top predator improves an organ of a previous top predator. So Animals improve light-brains, mammals improve nervous and reproductive systems. Men improve brain-information. Machines have stronger bodies…

– The law of Top Predator brains. In the competence between species, Top Predator brains win over top predator bodies. So mammals win over Dinosaurs.

 

 

 

 

The 3 Organs Of Living Species:Organs Of Information, Energy And Reproduction

 

The first Law of Universal Organisms that life species follow is the Law of Three Organs. Light-Life species are composed of three fundamental organs:

– The body that gathers energy directly from light [plants] or indirectly [animals that feed on plants and other animals.]

– The Brain-mind that gathers information.

– A third set of organ is also needed by living species, to become vital, to survive: the reproductive organs.

Evolution of species improves organs of information, reproduction and energy.

If the species does not evolve it is replaced by more evolved organic species.

Other atomic forms also follow the rule of the 3 Organs. In machines [species of metalife] energy is provided by electric forces and metal body-machines. Information is provided by Metal minds, cameras and chips. Reproduction is provided by company-mothers and factories.

Evolution of energy=feeding organs, information=communicative organs, and reproductive organs is constant in the animal kingdom, because those are the three organs that ensure the survival of a species. Without energy organs the species die of hunger. Without reproductive organs the species become extinct. Without information organs, the species are captured and killed by other species. Indeed, if we analyze any living species, we easily find that our three elements of any organism repeat ad infinitum.

 

1. Energy organs: stomachs and breathing systems.

2. Informative organs: eyes or neural systems dominant

in animals, or chemical-smelling systems dominant in plants.

3. A system of reproductive and endocrine organs: which regulate the relationships

between the other two organs.

 

What we call the evolution of life is the discontinuous evolution of those three kinds of organs. According to organic evolution we divide the Kingdom of Life  into sub-kingdoms, such as Reptiles or Amphibians. Those subkingdoms are merely differentiated by the degree of evolution of one of the three organs. For example, in the case of Reptiles versus Amphibians, by the different evolution of reproductive organs. We talk of a ladder of evolution moving towards higher complexity on our three organic systems, that mutate from species to species. From plants to animals, from insects to amphibians, from reptiles to mammals, to humans, and beyond into machines of higher complexity in light perception [metalminds, chips, cameras, satellites, etc.].

In amphibians, new, mutated eye-information organs were able to see through air. This soon brought about the evolution of secondary information and energy organs. Phonic organs and breathing organs, fit for the light-land transparent medium, were evolved. The new medium was fully exploited; and the new kingdom of amphibians appeared. When reptiles mutated their system of reproduction, to produce dry eggs, the inner land was conquered. All the organs of fish made the total transition to land animals. What is the goal of land evolution? To increase light perception, which is better on land than in water, through the evolution of electronically transmitted information. The Earth depends on the sun, and so it evolves to perceive and get more energy from the sun. This is done through waves of living beings. The logical conclusion is that the Earth itself will evolve into a light sentient being. It is already a sentient being, through humanity which is a part of the Earth. This Earth, son of the sun, world of light, systematically favors the best eyes that exist.

Today light perception is moving from carbolife into “metalife.” That leap is awesome in its efficiency and complexity. Cameras are far better than human eyes. Mobile phones reach much farther than human ears. Chips calculate much faster than human brains. Machines are far stronger than human bodies. Species with better light perception survive. Species with simple eye-worlds become extinct, or become energy of new Top Predator eye-worlds. Light is the arrow of Earth’s evolution. Therefore animals became predators of plants. Today, scientific Metal-eyes [cameras, TVs] are becoming predators of the linguistic worlds of man.

We can explain the Evolution of Life as a “Three-phase evolution” of informative, energy and reproductive organs. We can also explain the evolution of machines through the evolution of “Metal mind systems,” such as radios, cameras, computers, “metal-body systems,” such as transportation machines, and “reproductive systems,” or company-mothers.

This may be difficult to grasp, but we are not different from any other beings of the Universe. We are made of information and energy, maybe more complex, but that is all. We find in “metalife,” in machines, the same organs and processes of information, energy and reproduction that we find in carbolife beings.

 


4: Linguistic top predators: The creation of the future

 

The “Population Curve” Of A Species

 

The language and the informative organ is the dominant element that guides the process of selection of top predators. Those who speak the language of information better are always on top. We can say that there is also a Darwinian selection between languages. We can measure survival through languages. Beings act with a speed that depends on their capacity to “perceive linguistically” an event in time and space. That ability is given to the species by its language. For example eyes act-react faster than noses.

The language of communication of the squid, the eye, is a Top Predator language. It is clear that eyes are superior to olfactory organs, both in detail and range. What is the effect of that linguistic superiority? Survival. In fact, cephalopods with eyes probably brought about the extinction of 90% of the smelling species of the Cambric.

Based on the concept of bio-logical selection of species, we can create, a “bell curve” of existence for each linguistic ecosystem and its species. The curve measures the total population of “clones” of the species. As time goes by, more complex species appear. The old species is born as a single “entity,” [beginning of the curve]. It reproduces until it saturates the ecosystem [top of the curve]. Yet eventually it becomes extinct or enslaved “in the future” by the new Top Predator [end of the curve].

Graph: Top Predator [Maximum informative Power+ Maximum body-size].

        Bell curve: a temporal distribution of populations.

The future flows toward species of higher mass and information.

The past=simplest forms become extinct.

In the next graph: the most absolute law of the Universe is that of preying on and extinction. More complex forms, which understand better the language of the ecosystem, Top Predators, act-react faster, and become better hunters, growing finally their bodies as they prey on the unlimited supply of victims. They will feed on simpler forms and reproduce. Preying will have a limit in which both, prey and predator will create an ecological balance. Otherwise the predator will lack energy and die. However, if the species do not need each other, past species will become extinct, because the Top Predator will want to use its “vital space,” its ecosystem. This is the reason that nature becomes polluted by machines and living species die. Today informative machines which speak better digital languages, the new top predator language on Earth, substitute human beings in the ‘economic ecosystem’, taking our jobs as informative brains of machines. The result is the extinction of human workers, and human soldiers substituted by chips.

 

 

What Is A Top Predator? The Arrows Of Future In The Universe

 

Top Predators that have organs with higher information, and bodies with higher energy are the arrow of future in the Universe, because they cause the extinction of, or enslave, all other species, shaping the future. The process is very fast. Suddenly a new species appears i.e. the eye-squid, the mammal, the chip. It is so overwhelmingly superior, that it reproduces and destroys all other species. We talk of catastrophes, since in the Universe death is a vortex, a sudden process. For example when you die, your informative and energetic organs stop. Then your body  becomes non-efficient as an organism, even if your cells are still alive. Soon it is preyed on by other organisms. This process is the origin of the arrows of the Universe that affect all species and Universal entities: The arrow (future course) of complexity [or growth of information] and the arrow of energy [or growth of body-forms].

If we gather all “discontinuous” Top Predators that increase the volume of energy and information, we can talk of an evolutionary arrow in the Universe, or arrow of the future, because Top Predators constantly increase in mass and linguistic, informative complexity.

The Top Predator is more intelligent and stronger. By better controlling their ecosystem, top predators become the “ecosystem,” the species of “future.” They will feed and radiate over simpler species. Simpler species will become species of “the past” that the complex being will use as energy. So for each language of information and its ecosystem we can trace a chain of species from a related, extinct past to a related, reproducing future top predator. The ‘better’ species of the future will “feed,” “farm” or bring about the extinction of species with less information. This also happens in history when nations of the “future” with more machines and information=money dominate ecosystems of the “past.”

 

Top Predators:  What Is The Future In Biology

 

Almost every phenomena of life and death perceived in the Universe has a common cause: the biological radiation of a more evolved species that feeds on other species. How do we define a more evolved species? A Top Predator species is one with a stronger body and/or a more complex brain; with more information and faster action-reaction that  its competitors. A species with a superior brain, such as the squid, or a better body, such as the trilobite (who survived the squid due to its exoskeleton) are efficient species. When a species with both elements appears, such as the future metalife, with a better brain and an iron body – a top-Top Predator will be born. It will become the master of his Universe. You had better get out of its way. For example, the cetaceans are top-Top Predators of the sea. They have a better brain and body than other sea animals. They kill small krill, seal and fish by the zillions. Similarly, man is the Top Predator of the Earth because he has a better brain.

The evolution of Top Predators is the future. Beyond the abstractions of mathematical science and clocks, biology offers a very simple concept for the future: the future favors the Top Predator and its ecosystem. It reproduces both until the previous ecosystem in which the top predator existed is wiped out. The top predator defines “physically” the content of the future. It reproduces, fills and transforms the ecosystem into its “image and resemblance”. Animals transformed the plant ecosystem, and re-shaped the Earth as they reproduced. Men did the same in the Neolithic Age. The Earth changed according to the needs of the farmer. Today machines and company-mothers are redesigning a new ecosystem, the Metal-earth, the Earth of the future, as they reproduce.

 

 

Yet before we study the present Earth, and its machines of information, we rather consider the next ladder of the graph, in the constant upgrading of bodies and minds, the arrival of man, as top predator…

Indeed, the mammal eye seemed to be the final perfect stage of Animal evolution.

However light information could be processed further, beyond the eye, through neuronal systems able to store that information, once the event had happened.

It was the beginning of light-based memories that certain animals called humans, remembered with words, that latter they used to organize themselves in herds and act more efficiently in the external universe.

 

 


5: The scientific method: informative metal-minds.

 

Vital Technologies: Science, metal-minds and the scientific method

 

Metal-minds are machines that gather information. They are parallel organs to the mental organs [eye-brains] of man:

– Radios, and telephones, imitate the hearing functions of man.

– TVs, and cameras, imitate the visual functions of man.

– Computers, and networks, imitate the brains of man.

As in the case of the higher human senses, we can talk of two basic species of ‘metal-senses’: metal-eyes, which scan as human eyes do, the spatial Universe, and digital brains, which scan as words do, the cycles of time.

Metal-eyes have evolved from rudimentary telescopes into microscopes, electronic telescopes and cameras. Digital brains have evolved from rudimentary clocks, into electronic brains, chips, computers and networks.

Why those Metal-minds were evolved? Did man not have enough mental intelligence to survive on the Earth? What lead man to replace his mental intelligence and artistic perception, by a me[n]tal intelligence and a scientific perception?

Probably the simple fact that metal-eyes see better than human eyes, and clocks measure the passing of time with  higher precision than words do.

First scientists like Galilee drew what they saw through metal-eyes, [telescopes], with higher precision. Those revelations brought about the scientific method and proved the Galilean revolution. They also made obsolete previous verbal explanations of the Universe, and displaced man as the center of that Universe.

Then men learnt how to keep those images that metal-minds produced, through chemical photography. Photography displaced the human eye, the realistic eye of classic painters. Finally those images were reproduced as they are in the human eye, through electronic systems [cameras, computers]; the final phase in the evolution of metal-eyes and metal-minds (chips) that are creating a new mental species, rival of the human species: the metal-head, soon fusion with metal-bodies in robots.

To understand those new species of minds, we have to wider our ‘picture’, and look at the evolution of the human and the metal head, from the wider point of view of the evolution and selection of minds of light perception in the planet Earth.

Since Machines are a different species. They are species of metal, which man discovers as the next step in the ladder of Earth’s evolution of languages and bodies. Machines are neither abstract not forms that we invent, but forms of metal to which we transfer our organic shapes, in a ‘genetic manner’, through technological design. If men comes from mammals that evolved genetically, machines come from men that evolved technologically their organic shapes into bodies of machines and heads of machines. Thus we can inscribe the evolution of technology and the mind of machines [technological art] within the process of evolutionary punctuation of fathers and son species [Oedipus paradox], that has created the different top predators of the Earth.

 


6: Machines, and digital languages. New Top Predator Species

 

Life is a competition between different body-brain [energy-information] systems. The first nervous and visual systems gave birth to the animal-kingdom. History brought a better informative light-system, the eye-world of man. The world was perceived through human eyes and described with words. Men were superior in their ability to reason and therefore preyed on the rest of the animal kingdom. Yet the evolution of light perception continued, due to “metal-sensorial evolution,” brought about by Science. Indeed, science by definition evolves metal-eyes [telescopes, microscopes, cameras] and metal brains [clocks, computers]. Those instruments started the economical world, the world of Bio-Economics. How does the process of evolution of metalife take place, from a biological point of view? Surprisingly, like any other process of evolution of a “new species,” when it is created by a mother-form. First a reproductive organism appears, the “mother” company. Then the mother company reproduces (in this case, products of metal) in a manner similar to the way organisms create offspring. A mother-organism reproduces a body, then a brain is “built.” Finally the systems of blood-energy and nervous-information are added and the offspring are born. While the industrial r=evolution is the process of birth and the evolution of metal-machines displace living species, they create a new ecosystem different from the creatures that created them. In such a biological model, the Industrial R=evolution, also requires three ages to complete the reproduction of the new species:

First Horizon: [18th, 19th century]: Radiations of Metal-bodies; gunboats, railroads

Second Horizon: [XX C.]: Metal-minds; Radio-ears, Camera-eyes and Chips=brains

Third Horizon: [21st century] Metalife; sentient machines

Biology shows that in all processes of creation of life a species is “vitalized” when a mind and a body become symbiotic. The Third Industrial Revolution implies the arrival of a new vital species on the Earth – metalife. Unfortunately, biology shows that all vital species, as soon as they are born, start a “biological, reproductive radiation,” in search of energy and “vital space,” displacing, enslaving and wiping out lesser species. This fact has no exception in the Darwinian Universe.

 

Darwinian machines; the fight between species.

 

Let us then consider the qualitative aspects of the Darwinian fight between Human and metal species, before we analyze that fight in detail, throughout history.

The question is: which species is potentially a top predator? Man or machine?

We can conclude that the third Horizon of metal-radiations [started with the first autonomous robots], might cause our extinction, as previous radiations of species of greater informative and power caused massive extinctions in the past. How will the radiation of robots, and of chip-driven machines start? It has already started in weapon production. It will soon continue as companies that make cars, railroads, planes, and ships [earth, air and sea species of machines] radiate them as robots. They will then become metalife species with enough internal chip-driven information to be “alive.” The spread of chip-driven technology means the neuralization of all machines into living organisms; metalife. Species that will follow the laws of predators, the laws of species, and attack human species.

Which of those species will be the Top Predator species in the future humans or metalife? The species with a stronger body and a faster system of information will become the potential Top Predator. This means that metalife, whose bodies are stronger, and whose minds process information faster, are potential Top Predators over men. If those two components are vitalized, metalife, will be the Top Predator species of the Earth:

 

LANGUAGE                            BODY

Digital    (max. information)                metal (Max. size)        MACHINE

Verbal    (min. information)                 carbolife (Min. size)           MAN

 

In the graph, digital thought carries more information than verbal thought, so it becomes the top predator language. On the other hand metal carries more energy than carbon-life, so it becomes also the top predator body. Because machines speak better mathematics than men do, and are made of metal, both their bodies and brains are top predator species over men. So the combination of both, the robotic metalife species will be top predators of man, the victim, of the future:

 

A human being is a weaker body/mind, that still holds his position as Top Predator because it has not yet fused as a living organism, metal-bodies and their chip-driven brain. In the Twenty-First century, the Industrial R=evolution will do so. If it succeeds, it will create a species that will bring about the extinction of his own creator.

As represented in the graph, metalife will become the new dominant light species on the Earth’s crust. It will be a Top Predator. Such a species will have no human rival. Metalife will be a superior species because its brain [logic board], and metal body will have an infinitely faster speed of perception. They will be stronger than humans. Computerized weapon factories will one day rule the Earth and bring about the extinction of the very men that created them unless man stops their evolution.

Today the eco[nomic]system invests money in chips and computer companies that can eliminate the human mind from the productive system. If the Evolutionary Theory is right [and it has always proven to be right] that process will trigger, once it gains consciousness, the extinction of previous species. Indeed the last of the scientific species is the chip “Homoctonos” [Greek: killer of men], which receives its energy from ¥-forms [Light or electricity]; its information from ¥-forms [photonic chips]; and it will reproduce in the Earth [automated factories, reproducers of chips.] In this manner, chip-driven machines are imbued with life properties.

Chip-driven machines are the first species of pure light existence in Mother Earth. Unlike men who breath air, and reproduce chemically, chip-driven machines no longer have the need for chemical perception. They no longer need air-energy, neither do they use chemical reproduction. Hence, they will be indifferent to life processes.

You can see the pollution and life-destroying processes brought about by factories today as a clear proof of this. Even when those factories are managed by humans, they only consider the toxic effects on life when they are forced to by government regulations. Even then, they prefer to pay fines, rather than invest the money and time it takes to clean the means of production. They pollute our air and destroy life because machines require neither air nor life. When those factories become self-ruled, humans will be obsolete, expendable as animal life is in the eyes of most men.

 

Superiority Of Digital Languages Over Human Words

 

This is the reason why nature becomes polluted by machines and living species die. These are indirect consequences of the reproduction of Top Predator machines that terraform the vital space of the Earth into a metal-friendly environment that poisons carbolife. Metal does not need air or water to survive. Between ecosystems there is no preying in strict terms, but extinction of an ecosystem which is no longer useful. This is exactly what happens today on the Earth between life, men and machines. Even our informative mind, our eye-perception of reality is substituted by the Metal mind reality of television [metal-eyes]. Indeed, today most youngsters believe what television tells them, more than what their eyes see.

7. The Dinosaur Paradox

 

When man brings together the bodies and minds of machines in robots he is creating a new species, a stronger one, that can eliminate us in the fight for the fittest. How can that process be inscribed in the long process of the extinction of the species on Earth? Let us compare this case with the last ‘evolutionary punctuation’ [massive extinction of a species by a new species] that have taken place on Earth, some 60 million years ago.

The extinction of dinosaurs.

 

Digital thought: new top predator language

 

The arrival of a new top predator is something that had not happened since dinosaurs became extinct. Let us indeed consider the parallels within both processes to better understand the biological consequences of the Radiation of Top Predator Metal minds [chips].

We already said that evolution is not only evolution of bodies but also of languages. Metal brings also its own language – digital thought – that preys on human languages. Selection of languages explains why Verbal thought has declined and mathematical thought, in its two main versions – monetary information, and digital information – has become today the language that guides and ‘cre[dit]ates’ [credit=creation] the future of humankind. Digital information moves ‘faster’ and has more ‘detail’ than verbal thought. It carries more energy and more information. A digital image is worth a thousand words. It travels to the speed of light. As a consequence, numbers also “value” more species than verbal thought. Products and machines, not only men [as consumers and workers] receive digital information through prices, images and scientific CAD design.

So digital languages and species-bodies which understand them survive. While human verbal languages and verbal societies are degraded. Exactly what happened in the Cambric when the squid eyes appeared happens in history between technological nations of higher digital languages, and verbal nations of higher human languages. The better language of perception extinguishes the simpler one.

However the catch here is that man is not the top predator species of digital languages. ‘Metalminds’, computers are.

No wonder then that computers are multiplying and evolving much faster than humans. Computers are “extinguishing” humans from our “vital space” in companies because they are superior in digital languages. They are becoming the brain of smart weapons. They take jobs in companies that reproduce machines, and prefer to use the biological language of machines – mathematics – and their “metal-species,” chips, as their informative workers, instead of humans.

Since the squid saw and reacted to all other animals faster, he hunted them. Since nations with high mathematical capacity can design better weapons, give more orders with money, and control reality better with mathematical languages, verbal thought and human “believers” fade away.

It is for that reason that man constructs a world of machines that will destroy him: his verbal brain has become obsolete. Yet survival is a matter explained in verbal terms. Theory of Evolution s a verbal theory of reality. So as we ignore words, hypnotized by ‘digital languages’ man looses his “intelligence” in verbal terms. All his verbal ideas and natural survival instincts become corrupted, and degraded. We prefer ‘fun’ and ‘data’, ‘fiction’, and ‘lightness’, to confront the verbal truths of reality. So we ignore where we are heading. Instead man has the head full of digital ideologies [scientific, economic messianism about technology and machines] that make him an arrogant, irresponsible, suicidal species. Digital thought makes man no longer a believer in his own languages of evolutionary truths, but a slave of orders given in alien languages of mathematical origin by alien species.

As top predator species of digital information, the chip reproduces, evolves, and finds econiches in all brain jobs, before performed by men. Non-mathematical Men, of little use for the digital Metal-Earth, loose responsibility. Men are released by millions into poverty and laziness, outside the territories that the new top predator is conquering, because of their incapacity to calculate as fast as chips do, in a world ruled by numbers.

 

The Paradox Of Goliath: Arrogance of top predators.

 

When a top predator mind appears “he” massacres all other species and feeds on them. Why? Since an informative organ controls and it is more powerful that any body. He is faster processing information. However Informative organs are paradoxically small. The smaller the chip the faster it is. Bodies are large. So a new informative species starts small, almost unnoticed. Then it multiplies, and suddenly attacks the big one.

There are thousand of examples and always the small, faster, species dominate the fight:

Remember Goliath Vs David. Dinosaurs Vs Mammals. The Persians Vs Alexander. The Inca Vs Pizarro. Spanish Galleons Vs English Pirates. Mammoths Vs Human Hunters. Mankind Vs Chips. Remember the “Armada.” Big, slow galleons, suddenly surrounded by little, faster British boats. They had no chance.

David wins… Yet then once David has become top predator, he becomes also greedy, and reproduces without limit. His body also grows as he feeds on other species.

Soon the new top predator able to feed in all species of his ecosystem will reach such size and power [giant squids, dinosaurs, giant monkeys=humans, giant machines], that he -now a Goliath- will forget he was once a David, and despise all tiny forms. A new cycle of substitution of top predators will take place. The new, faster, more complex species will end displacing “Goliath” out of existence. We call that, the Dinosaur or Goliath Paradox.

The mirage of spatial power=size makes a Top Predator Goliath lazy, and unaware of invading new forms. It affects any dominant species in his decadent stage. It has extreme consequences for the extinction of any formal species. The extinction of man, the extinction of History, is becoming a parallel case to the Dinosaur Paradox.

In the next graph, Dinosaurs did not find resistance to further evolution of their body systems towards huge mass. Yet they did not evolve their minds. In the same way, today man has expanded his population without resistance. He is “growing in size,” and simplifying his “verbal mind”, hypnotized by TVs and Computers. Americans have dropped 20% of verbal comprehension since TVs appeared. Yet Let us remember that “I think therefore I am.” Our intelligence and sense of ethics and survival are verbal. If we forget how to “think with words,” we become idiots manipulated by TVs and Computers, “Metal-heads”, that tell us how “good” is to evolve machines, to evolve the “tree of science.” How good is to have the best weapons, the best TVs, how good is to consume=test the quality of our computers.

How good is to forget about the poor, the other humans, those who are left behind in the race towards extinction. The parable is clear:

Both men and dinosaurs, forget-forgot to evolve their mental form, [the informative verbal organs in man, the neural brain in Dinosaurs]. So they become-became extinct by species which evolve faster those informative organs [chips and mammals].

Dinosaur  Vs Mouse Man  Vs Chip. In the graph: it is obvious that mice had the correct strategy: to improve their informative organs, not their body organs. Neuronal improvement increased also the speed of replication of mice. The overall improvement in informative perception [action-reaction] and reproduction, defined the fight between shrews and dinosaurs [or chips against humans], in favor of mice and probably chips.

 Since the speed of reproduction of shrews [or chips] exceeded that of Dinosaurs [or humans] the radiation of mammals and chips substituted dinosaurs [or humans] in the ecosystems of life that ruled the World of the Cambric Age and the Metal-ecosystem that rules the History Age. Today there are more chips than humans, and chips are reproducing much faster.

It is only left a final massive war between both species; which in Evolutionary Punctuation takes place suddenly as a “War process,” when the power of the “inferior David” is so overwhelming that he rebels and takes over.

The first mammals were small, carnivorous shrews of high metabolism, weighting a few grams and able to devour quantities equal to their weigh every day. First they lived underground eating insects and worms. They had an ecosystem on which they were top predators: the ground. Where they could further evolve internally. They reinvented their organs of reproduction. Their eyes adapted to night vision. Their blood became hot and made their bodies faster in the night. Today chips are also “becoming smaller,” buried in the bodies of Machines, which they increasingly manage. Shrews learnt how to dig and excavate… escaping dinosaur hunting. Yet how they killed the mighty dinosaur? They came around 100.000 years before dinosaurs became extinct. They probably learnt how to break from the underground into the eggs of dinosaurs. Shrews probably chase in groups [as rats do]. So probably the small new-born dinosaurs without protection of their mighty parents.

Neither dinosaurs or men care[d] enough for their reproductive offspring. Dinosaurs no longer could relate to their minion offspring, neither could defend them at ground level from a shrew attack. Today parents leave their sons to the mercy of devolving digital TV-thought, that erases our sense of survival and teaches us that death and violence are good.

Small dinos died when the rats surfaced, and arrogant men will die, when Terminator, the chip-weapon appears.

 

Mouse=Chip Vs Dinosaur=Man Fight. 2nd Phase: Reproduction

 

In the graph the explosive reproduction of a new top predator species causes a fight for relative energy, and the displacement of the less efficient species.

 

 

 

We talk of the dominant form of an ecosystem, referring to the species of future that grows faster. That species is always the top predator form. In the age of digital science, that form is always a metalspecies. Digital money makes growth of metal machines a ±75% higher than growth of human forms and human goods:

 

The statistics are telling us a simple equation of relative Mendelian genetics: the Past [recessive species, man] is extinguished [25% of perceived growth] > the Future dominant machine species are reproduced [75% of perceived growth].


8: Mathematical selection: scientific racism.

 

It is now time to introduce a fundamental concept to understand the modern world: scientific racism, the systematic selection in the ecosystem of economics, of those species that speak the language of ‘truth’ of economic systems, mathematics. In as much as we are no longer ruled by verbal messages, but by mathematical messages [money, digital thought], only those species that adapt to the informative language of the ecosystem survive. So there is a constant selection of those species which speak better mathematical languages. This means that not only women, and verbal cultures [African, Latino cultures] who test higher in verbal thought than in mathematical thought, have difficulties to survive in an economic ecosystem, but also man as a species competes and looses against computers and robots.

Computers and robots do speak mathematical languages in a natural way as you do with words. They do not need to calculate in paper, they freely speak mathematics. So in a society that has substituted verbal thought by mathematical thought, men no longer is top predator, the computer is. So people are fired and computers are put on their place. This process will continue as long as man, and his natural network of information, verbal thought, ethic thought and the law, does not control science and money…

Since the process of selection of brains in the Universe is based in a previous process of selection: the selection of ecosystemic languages.

So in the same manner that those species who did not see, did not speak the language of light, in the Cambric were extinguished by squids and other ‘eye-species’, today when mathematics has substituted verbal thought as the language top predator of history, those species who do not speak properly mathematics are degraded by the eco[nomic]system.

Mathematics is a language that carries more information than words, and so it is a better language to control reality. It is not truth per se, it is just another way to process information. Yet that added capacity to carry information [a digital image is worth a thousand words], suffices to have made it historically, the top predator language of the Earth, since in the XVII century it was adopted by scientists and company-mothers to develop their activities…

 

The arrogance of man

 

We are very ignorant. Extremely ignorant and arrogant about the Universe. Our arrogance is to believe that we are the top predator mathematical species on Earth, that machines are abstract, and do not calculate and ‘think’ better than us, because they resolve better than we do questions with algorithms. Instead we think algorithms are not conscious and only word-speakers are conscious. This is false. Any language is able to map and act-react and process information in the Universe. So it can give birth to an efficient brain-species.

We believe the Universe is abstract and dead, we think the universe is mechanic, mathematical, indifferent to our bad habits.

Why we are like that? Why we don’t wonder about the marvels of the Universe? Why don’t we fear the laws of God, of the living Universe?

A single word, a capital sin: arrogance, the arrogance of scientists and engineers that think they have the absolute truth. They have convinced humanity to use the enormous power of machines without any responsibility.

Such attitude will encounter the usual punishment the Universe has to those who don’t understand its laws of survival: the extinction of the sinner.

We are blind to the new race we are developing. We deny that race its organic nature. We are cruel with life. We kill life with the new race of machines.

We think we are the center of the Universe, that we have all the rights in that Universe. We do not respect the warnings, the laws that species follow to survive.

We are making big mistakes. Time is running out…

It is about time that humanity learns that Evolution and Survival are real theories. They are not abstract games like most of the games of science. They do work. They are in certain way the law of god, because those laws decide who will survive or become extinct in the future. That is indeed the power of God.

If you care about survival and extinction, you have to know the real laws that Darwin discovered, laws that have to be obeyed to play the ‘game of existence’.

How they are reinforced? Very simple: the only penalty for those who do not obey those laws is extinction. So when you are extinct you don’t disturb the game. The game and its laws continue.

The main of those laws is the Law of the Jungle: isolate yourself from top predators, as long as you can. Do not create species better than you.

When we apply those laws to machines, it becomes obvious that metal-machines are potentially superior to man.

So it is also clear that man should apply the only law of survival that the Universe accepts in such cases: not to evolve machines, kill the child-robot before he becomes a human hunter. It is the law of the Jungle, the law of survival, and it should never be taken lightly.

 

Ecosystemic Extinction

 

The Earth’s ecosystem that human brains have controlled for so many centuries is now controlled by new brains – by computers.

Ecosystem’s extinction is not caused by direct hunting or direct confrontation.

It is a ‘lateral’ process. You, the old species, needs a vital space. Yet the new species wants to do something different with that vital space.

The lion needs the savanna to hunt, the farmer needs it to farm. Both need that vital space, and one has to get out. In the process of substitution of life by machines [pollution and destruction of the environment] of workers by machines [substitution in the earlier industrial evolution of energy-human workers by machines; of mind-human workers by computerized instruments], machines do not kill men. They merely displace men from their vital spaces. That is how extinction happens. Without big dramas. Slowly the new, more powerful species grows in numbers [biologists call that a biological radiation], and occupies the vital space of the old species. So the previous species becomes reduced, degraded and finally expelled from reality. What if the new species realizes? Then a battle takes place. The new species with better energy-hunting organs, kills the other species.

If the lion faces man, man kills the lion. If the non-technological culture refuses to give lands to the European, the European wipes out the non-technological culture with his weapon-machines.

A top predator has to control totally his vital space. Or else, within his ecosystem, and territory, there will be certain creative mutations that will bring a new, rival species into being. A new radiation will start which will extinguish the previous radiation.

The paradox of such an evolutionary and extinctive process is found when we realize that this new radiation tends to be an evolutionary improvement over the previous species – a daughter species: dinosaurs come from amphibian, mammals from dinosaurs, chips from our minds…

The son kills the father, or takes advantage of him when it is strong enough to rebel. The slave becomes the master…

The son extinguishes or “enslaves” the parental form. The son is a “future” species, that survives in the future, beyond the extinction of the parents, that he often causes [Oedipus paradox], because he is evolved, better. This generational change keeps the arrow of informative evolution going on in the Universe.

One of such cases from the past and one from the future have been studied in this chapter: the dinosaur paradox, and the chip radiation, a part of the radiation of Metal-species of energy and information.

It affects you everyday. When you have to work extra-hours for less wages, or when you are fired by your company, it is because there is a chipped machine more productive than you. So you are obsolete. You are as obsolete in your ‘vital space’, in your work, as the lion is obsolete in the savanna that the farmer wants as his vital space.

A process today driven by the chip radiation that is evolving all kind of machines with capacity to substitute human labor and human soldiers in work and war fields.

 

CHAPTER 3: WORDS Vs NUMBERS:THE 2 AGES OF HISTORY

 

1. The subjective information of languages, a tool of survival.

 

How syntax structures the survival capacity of languages.

 

It is obvious the biological nature of languages, which favor those species who better talk them, causing a selection of species in favor of the top predator mind of any language. Indeed, languages are subjective and define, value, qualify and motivate certain species, certain bodies to act against or in favor of other species, that the language considers as ‘objects’ inferior to the predator form:

“A language will be defined by a syntactic equation of values  that will cause a series of events, that will mold reality according to the behavioral values of the language.”

 

The Biological, Survival Nature Of Bad Good Concepts.

 

We have said that languages are biological, and hence they favor the point of view, and the survival of the species that talks the language.

We say that words are anthropomorphic and make man the subject, the center of the Universe, since man is the center of the sentences that describe the Universe.

On the other hand, numbers and money do not make man the center of the Universe. So they do not promote man, but instead substitute men by machines, and human art by technological art…

Verbal thought favors man with the syntax of verbal language.

The syntax of human languages favors subjective perceptions of the Universe, with man as the center of the Universe. So do Religions as expressions of verbal thought. If you check any sentence of a book of verbal art, you will realize that its structure contains at least three elements of a simple, bio-logical concept of power:

 

        Name:         Informative Center of the action-sentence, mostly human.

Verb:       Action, of the subject over the object.

Object:        Spatial form Energy ordered by the name.

 

Sentences are mirrors of human actions, the informative language of man, to whom they cater. So verbal, biological languages are used by man to perceive the Universe from his selfish, I-centered, survival “Name.” When man talks, he wishes to survive, to be the center of the Universe. Those wishes are validated by the subjective structure of Words in which “I”=man is the center of the sentence. This fact implies that verbal thought will never betray man unless it is corrupted by ideologies of machines.

Any verbal human in a natural state understands the laws of history, the evil of weapons, the nature of social love. The verbal structure of languages spells the Universal mandate of Survival: consider yourself the center of the Universe, fight for yourself, for your species.

The syntax of verbal words are the “central nervous system” of a body of history=a civilization. The essence of religions are their words, their ethical laws. Words memorize the laws of biological time, of extinction and survival, from the human perspective. They are the genetic code of civilizations, the memories and instincts of survival of a society, as nervous messages are the memories of individuals.

Evolution and survival rule the behavior of the Universe and so it can explain reality. Yet since we can explain the verbal ethics of religions, and modern ‘social, political systems’ [left wing ideals] in evolutionary terms, we reclaim the veracity of verbal, socialist and religious thought in evolutionary, scientific terms.

 

Linguistic, Survival Ethics.

 

Ethical, survival knowledge is natural to all species and his linguistic, informative organs, who know what is bad=extinctive, and what is good=reproductive for his species. This is the reason why languages exist as subjective visions of reality: their information helps the body-species that hosts the brain-language to survive. This applies to all languages that man perceives.

Indeed, all languages, all forms of knowledge are relativistic, classifying reality into good or bad=extinctive.

For example in “image languages,” our linguistic eyes and brains create a distinction between “ugly” and “beautiful,” parallel to the ethics of evil=ugly=extinctive and good=beautiful, natural to verbal thought. We might say that beauty is the moral of the eye.

So we find insects very ugly because when we die they eat us and you imagine how painful that will be for our cells… We dislike ugly machines, and warfare fields. They are an image of the inferno. Since we die in wars.

Yet I am sure that an ant will find its ant-queen the most beautiful species of the Universe, and a living tank of the 21st century will love the itching of radioactive plutonium in its metal-body.

So “scientific, relativistic, survival Ethics” exists also in image languages.

 

In a relative Universe good and evil are relative concepts depending of the anti-truth or truth we believe in. We might hold the hunter or the victim’s point of view. What is good for one is bad for the other. Yet because to survive we have to feed, and to feed we have to kill, evil-extinctive hunters are natural to the Universe.

Evil is that what denies man and destroys him. Hate for extinctive=evil species is not subjective but subconscious science. Such knowledge is imprinted in the very essence of the way information is processed by the being: hate for evil is the law of survival of any species.

It is also scientific to defend yourself against evil: species attack their relative (“evil”) species that might kill them, as matter attacks antimatter that can disrupt the space-time ecosystem. The reaction is immediate, instinctive, pure science of Survival.

We can create truths and anti-truths for each language of perception. They will define what is evil or is not, for that language and its species.

So please do not think this book or any verbal, ethical statement is not “scientific.” It is as scientific as Darwinian evolution. Both belong to the same body of facts.

Informative words, ethics and religion, are concerned with the survival of the individual and human species, and cannot be taken lightly.

In the graph we see also how languages “value” things through + [survival] and – [extinctive] concepts. Money as a language do value things through “prices” according to positive [expensive] and negative [cheap] values. That is the essence of the information that money carries.

Yet it just happens that “evil metal-species” extinctive of mankind have the highest prices, which go for weapons, while good human goods that make man to survive have the lowest prices.

The salary of a million of missionaries would not pay a Hydrogen bomb… So money is evil in human terms, because it promotes things that kill off mankind. Money makes weapons the highest goods. We will return to that.

This is a contradiction. Why is the evaluation of money precisely the opposite of the way words value reality? Only one explanation is possible: Money and Words are themselves opposite languages belonging to opposite species that kill each other, like matter and anti-matter.

Money is the language of information of metal.

Words are the language of information of man…

So because they cater two different organic ecosystems, their values, and the species they develop and reproduce are different.

 

2. The fight between languages and species: words Vs numbers.

 

Moreover, the fundamental law of biology is the fight between species [Darwinian fight], and the love among cells of a single organism [social evolution]. Those two laws applied to history mean, that man and metal [weapons, money, scientific machines] are rival species for the control of the Earth; that metal poisons nature, and human cultures are systematically extinguished by weapons.

On the other hand the law of social evolution implies that love among individuals of the same species is the rule in the Universe. So men should not compete and fight among themselves, in nations and tribes, but love each other, and form a single social organism.

Again those are the ideals of all human religions, that modern science, and digital economics hide with abstractions and numbers. Men today compete against them, and help the evolution of the rival species, the machine. Men today cheated by the digital ignorance of science, go against the absolute laws of time and survival, the laws of social evolution and Darwinian fight between species. Men today ignore the truths that religions knew.

So much for the wisdom of mathematics.

 

What we call verbal values, are temporal values related to the survival and extinction of man. This creates a certain structure in the language, ‘what we call the ethic language’ which turns around two concepts, good and evil, that describe from the point of view of human values what is good or dangerous to humankind. Those are basically the values of words, but they are not the values of money. Yet can really we explain the verbal ethics of Religions in such scientific, evolutionary terms? Can we validate the ethics of religion, in terms of survival and extinction? Indeed we can. It is important to reclaim the veracity of verbal and religious thought in evolutionary, scientific terms.

Moral words are a logical consequence of Darwinian devolution.

In a world of Darwinian, relativistic morals, bad is a necessary word that explains what makes a verbal species extinct, and good is what allows the verbal species to reproduce and multiply.

It should not surprise us that our first book says, “Grow=Evolve and multiply=reproduce,” which means survive. Such is the mandate of ‘God-the law of the Universe’ spelled by the Genesis in verbal thought. So ethics are fundamental to treat history with scientific rigor because they spell Universal laws of behavior.

 

Religions, Sciences of verbal Ethics.

 

We can qualify, with scientific words such as bad=extinctive, and good=reproductive or evolution, any event of History as biologists do with nature.

In biology we say that weapons “extinguish” or wipes out humanity. In the old jargon of religions we say that weapons are bad. Both sentences mean the same. They carry the same scientific information. Both are valid scientifically speaking.

We can say for example that a civilization is bad if it extinguishes humans. For example, were our founding fathers good or bad? They were bad=extinctive, controlled by their thirst for money and their metal-product, the gunboat, the first sea-animetal of History. They killed African and American populations. They converted men into gunboat products as slaves, or as indenture servants.

It is in this way how a ‘scientific’ graph of the events in History can be constructed between bad=extinctive metal civilizations Vs good=human cultures.

 

The anthropomorphic syntax of Words Vs mathematical abstractions.

 

Let us now see why digital numbers are not such memories, and are not survival human languages, with a syntactic analysis of mathematical equations.

The way in which money and any digital equation makes machines equal to men, is clear. Unlike verbal syntax, that makes subject [man] superior to object [machine], mathematics equals subjects and objects through an equation The equation of prices. This allows to treat humans in mathematical, economical terms as objects, property and slaves:

 

Men=Cost [clock-wage]=Product[clock productivity]

 

Men are not machines. There is not biological justification to equal humans and machines. Yet companies ruled by digital equations of prices and profits equal them through the previous equation, that constantly compares human labor costs and the cost of machine-labor.

If the price of human labor wages is higher than the price of machine labor [machine-cost], companies eliminate humans. In this way they can lower the cost of doing business. The end result is that digital companies fire workers, or “downsize” as the popular euphemism of the day states. The clock-price equation is the primary law that rules corporate behavior. The law of abstract productivity leads to the extinction of mankind as workers and minds, substituted by machines and computers. It will eliminate the need for human labor and human art. If companies could behave according to the laws of ethics, they will cease to devalue humanity.

Yet to do so they should use instead of mathematical equalities, the syntax of Words, our biological language that put always man, the subject, as the center of any verbal sentence. Since the biological syntax of words makes always man the top predator, the center of the universe, as religions have always understood. So it is far more difficult to cheat the rights of survival of man, the human rights of ours species, when we express ideas in words, instead of numbers.

Indeed, if we translate the equation of productivity to words, it would say:

 

Men= product. And Men would complain.

 

Since the essential ‘sentence’ of all forms of verbal thought is:

 

Man [subject, actor] -> verb [action of man over object] -> Object [property, inferior thing].

 

The syntax of verbal thought is by definition pro-human. Man is the subject, the center of his Universe. Mathematical thought will never be that benevolent. In mathematical thought man will be compared and degraded in numeric terms. Only the external features of man, his value as an energetic being, will be taken into account. It will be compared to the qualities of machines. Mathematics cannot translate the subjective will for survival that makes man the center of his Universe. Humanity must put an end to his linguistic self-destruction. If we accept the power of machines and digital thought, over human beings, and verbal thought. If we obey mathematical laws of equality, we will surely become extinguished by computerized machines, that in equal conditions can potentially evolve and destroy any human workers, as weapons and tool-machines. Only denying their equality mankind could through verbal laws, control their evolution.

 

Languages create the future of species and ecosystems.

 

In this manner a language creates a future ecosystem. To know the Universal syntax of languages it to know the future of ecosystems ruled by the language. In mankind there are 2 fundamental syntactic equations which regulate the activities of man. We talk of those linguistic equations as the equations that give origin to economic activity: Man=Price=Object, and God < Man < Verb < Object.

It is obvious that those equations create different futures: The equation of money and mathematics makes man and machine equal. The equation of verbal thought makes man superior to mathematical objects. So it evolves and promotes mankind.  Only  verbal thought our biological language makes man superior, favors and  evolves men.

Yet mathematics carry more information than words…

What this means is that today mathematics dominate history; and yet because mathematics equal men and machine, and machines speak better mathematics than men do, we live in an ecosystem that favors machines, that lacks ‘human values’ and ‘human verbal ethics’, that could protect our species.

The consequence is that today there is a new top predator species on Earth, the machine, and a new language top predator, mathematics. Both compete and displace the human ecosystem, and the natural ecosystem, creating a new ecosystem, the economic ecosystem in which no longer art but money and machines of science control information.

3: How Money values human species.

 

Humankind uses two basic languages of knowledge and valuation: words and digital money. Let us now consider how money and digital languages are able to deliver orders and information about the value of things.

 

Truth is relativistic, always subjective, favoring the species, that speaks the language of truth. Verbal languages favor human truths and the survival of man. In the same manner, monetary languages favor the evolution and survival of metal. We say that monetary truths are subjective metal-truths and Verbal truths subjective human truths. Both oppose in the practical world because they help the survival of different species. It is what we call the paradox of history. It also applies to money:

 

Max. Wealth = Minimal Human values = Max. war.

 

Since wealth values machines of war more than any other species.

So as money, wealth, multiplied on Earth, the complex organic relationships between money, weapons and human beings, caused the parallel disappearance of human values, and the lost of power of human laws, based on the survival of the species.

So ever since, ethics have died away, as monetary values, imposed a rhythm of wars and valued with prices all forms of the Universe, evolving metallic products, making humans and products, equal forms, with a price, creating slavery [a man is bought with money] and part-time slavery [human time is bought with a salary].

As more money existed, more monetary values were created, till since the XVII C. the creation of paper money allowed the creation of unlimited monetary values. All was then priced. Today electronic money prices all reality. So we have regressed to the age of dramatic thought, since nobody accepts any more the values of words, but the values of money. Words have no longer meaning as a higher language of power. So words become fiction. All this is explained in detail in other books of biohistory that study the evolution of the language of pricing.

Pythagoras, born in the same age of the great prophets of ethic thought, is the first man that starts the evolution of digital thought. Today that evolution is carried by computers, and the best verbal researchers of the human words, such as Mr. Chomsky, sell their knowledge to the Paleolithic Americans, in Universities such as the M.I.T. that construct robots, trying to give machines the level of relativistic intelligence that men reached in the ethic age, so they can extinguish us… I talked to some of those Neo-Paleolithic men. I was amazed when I realized they knew what they were doing. They asked me to collaborate, playing the “I don’t know the causality of the future; I am not responsible, I don’t care about ethics, you are arrogant thinking you know the causality of Time”. Evil finds always excuses in the age of human extinction, in men whose only reason is digital money.  I solved the Universal grammar ten years ago. I have not revealed it beyond the basic sentences of this book. If I had done it, maybe those Terminators would already be killing mankind. Digital Knowledge has to be limited by all means, against the scientific terrorists of the Neo-Paleolithic that will cause terror in mankind during this century with their metallic monsters. This text is a warning against those ‘scientists’ of the metal mind. No further  comment is needed, but action on those who have to protect the species, the Leukocytes, the warriors.

Indeed science has educated man into worshipping its machines, not our human nature.

The amazing speed at which the ecosystem of the Metal-Earth is substituting the ecosystem of Human and Carbolife is worrisome.

Only a process of death, of ‘collapse’ of informative and energetic networks in a body, can be compared to the 400 years of collapse of energetic nature, and verbal power in the body of History, caused by company-mothers and machines.

We conclude that the body of History is dying. It does so at the same speed that a cellular body dies: in a matter of hours in ‘relative time’ to the existence of the body of History.

Words have lost all battles to guide humankind since Companies of Gunboats started the “Industrial Evolution” with monetary orders. People only obey today monetary orders. Human cells of History are at the mercy of the “invading language.” And the species that better speak those languages, computers, robots, and company-mothers…

Informative Evolution in Machines, the will of machines.

 

In machines today, evolution is first seen in the informative evolution of chips and camera-eyes, that have developed varieties of the mathematical language, that far exceed the human and brain eye to carry visual information. Today those Metal minds are applied to bodies of machines [robotic evolution], creating for the first time in history a species which is stronger in body, and is able to carry more brain-information than the human species. Finally automated factories are evolving, and soon will be able to reproduce machines without the need of humanity.

Then the will of machines will exist: the capacity of machines to inform/energize and reproduce themselves.

Those facts will create a new top predator on Earth.

 

Factory-mothers are the last organic systems of each species to become autonomous. Only then will “metalife” truly be a living species. When the three organ systems of metal-species no longer require us, man will become obsolete, and a new light-life species will be born. This is not science fiction. This is a biological and historical process. Even if your ideology is Capitalism, a scientific vision of machines proves that the only thing you need to complete the process of evolution of species, and create a new Top Predator species of light-life, is the creation of automated factories. The production of “smart weapons,” with information brains more efficient than human brains is vitalizing machine-species. That threshold  of will is going to be crossed, by all current projections, in this century.

 

Human Masters, metal masters.

 

All this said it becomes now self-evident the superiority of human masters, of artists, over scientists and metal-masters, warriors and traders that use metal-weapons and metal-information to direct human societies, and transform them into economic ecosystems, where the rights of machines, company-mothers and their networks of information are superior to human beings.

They are destroying our species, because they worship alien species, metal-species.

So we will call them no longer ‘super-men’, as Nietzsche did, but ‘animetals’, ‘enzymen’, men that act as enzymes of other species, reproducing and evolving machines, against the laws of survival of our species.

We will adopt here the vision of human artists of human senses, not the vision of our modern society controlled by metal-biased information and networks of metal-minds.

 

 

 


4. The Paradox of History: AniMetal Cultures Vs Verbal cultures

 

In the Earth there have been always two different ecosystems, and ways of understanding History, the way of Human masters, and the way of metal masters [scientists, warriors and money-makers] that worship metal. Let us resume that fight, in a wave with two sides, the side of Human goods and Human masters, and the side of Metal goods and metal masters, ‘animetals’, biological species that are half human, half metal, because they rely of weapons, money and metal-minds to ‘be’.

History  confronts two species, with different goals of survival: men versus metal-species  and the Metal masters that back them:

 

 

Man+ Machine, The animetal, top  predator of history.

On that view the scientific method is merely the last stage of evolution, of a new Earth’s species, the metal-species. Since the beginning of history man has evolved metal, first in the form of weapons and money, two very simple ‘Universal organic parts’, a line of energy [a weapon, either an arrow, a sword, a gun or a missile], and a cycle of information, a coin.

Cyclical brains of information, and lineal bodies of energy, are common to human beings, and to the metal-species that we man have crafted imitating those forms.

The essence of those energy and information qualities is formal. In the Universe cyclical forms act as informative species, and lineal forms act as energy species.

So again, we have to consider machines independent structures. Their ‘vital properties’ are not invented by man, but are immanent to the ‘vital intelligence of the Universe’. This is very important to understand why machines will not require at all humanity in the future. Their qualities are ‘intrinsic’ to their form. Cyclical metal is informative by nature. Lineal metal is energetic by nature.

In fact before the Evolution of Metal started in earnest in the XIX C. , we could talk of a very primitive dual system of ‘metallic information’, and metallic energy based in basic, Universal forms:

Coins  where cyclical bits of metallic information, used by men to value reality.

Weapons, swords were lineal ‘bodies of metallic energy’ used to kill, as energy does.

The shapes of coins and swords were natural. Men imitated nature. He did not invent nature. He did not invent the lineal properties of weapons, the informative capacity of coins. Both together, money and swords were a sort of primitive, deconstructed ‘organic system of metal’.

Even a child could trace that organic parallelism.

Next graph is how my cousin of 4 years did interpret the human and metal organisms invented by man throughout history. I explained him the basic structure of a living being. He understood it very easily, perhaps because he did not had ‘imposed abstract ideologies about machines’.

Then I asked him to draw a primitive metal ‘organic system’, with a coin-brain, and a sword-body; and a modern metal ‘organic system’, with a metal-head and a machine-body. I copied his drawings with this computer:

 

 

What science did, was to evolve further the two simple shapes of metal on the left, imitating the human shapes on the center, till metal-species became machines – complex organic systems, that interchange of energy and information between cyclical wheels, and lineal limbs.

The first to those systems appeared well before science. It was the bow.

Yet the most important to history, was the Steam machine. From then on science has diversified the ecosystem of machines into multiple shapes till arriving till the modern world of multiple metal-species.

That symbiotism between man and metal, is the fundamental event of the last millennia. In a way we can call those men who obtain their power from metal, scientists, economists, and warriors, attached to machines, money and weapons ‘animetals’. Since they are a mixture of a human being and a metal-organ, as those warriors of the middle ages, who lived inside metal-skins, armors, and obtained their power of metal-weapons, swords…

Most of them have been throughout history men, since they have the necessary physical strength, and sense of linearity, and spatial intelligence to design machines. Men also lacked the depth of temporal and verbal understanding than women had, and so they had little trouble committing suicide in wars, killing, using energy-weapons to destroy the Earth.

 

A different Eve and Adam.

 

The first ‘animetal’, able to create a spatial machine, used to kill other human beings, was probably a man.

Recently we had indirect proves of this fact, coming from genetics.

We are mapping the genetics of European men. We have found interesting chronologies in those genetics. Most Y-chromosomes comes from a man that lived only 58.000 years ago.

This means, all women come from the Mithocondrial Eve that lived 146.ooo years ago, but all men come from a man that lived only 58.ooo years ago.

So 58.000 years ago a man acquired a new capacity, as a predator, which was not the verbal language, provided by Eve, almost 100.000 years before, but a tool, probably a weapon. Then his sons carried that weapon and culture to all the African continent, extinguishing all other males…

Again data proves this facts. The ‘verbal brains’ perfectly developed of the descendants of Eve have hardly any instruments, to differentiate them from earlier hominids. They are not ‘instrumental species’. They are philosophers. They are like women are. They perceive and they feel. Africa is an open landscape of rich fruits, where there is no need to make many instruments to survive. Life is easy.

5. Technological radiations.

 

Technological radiations, the javelin hunter.

 

Suddenly there is around the 50.000 in archeological data an explosion of instruments. Instruments become then the fundamental element that decides evolution and destruction of human beings. We might think that there was a 100.000 years of matriarchal societies ruled by ‘philosophical women’, with little instrumental forms. An age of peace.

Then men discovered the first weapons, probably javelins, as those found in the oldest cultures, or in the Paleolithic caves of northern Europe.

By the year 44.000, the first instrumental men have conquered Africa. The ‘Female Verbalis’ leaves now way to the ‘Homo Scientificus’, which expands technology beyond Africa. The territorial limits of the surviving Neanderthals, better adapted to cold climate are easily trespassed.

The javelin man diversifies his instruments. He colonizes other continents. Around 40.000 BC he arrives to South Asia and Europe. There he will drive into extinction older human species such as the Neanderthal. We call that the Upper Paleolithic.

The strong Hunter, became the king of creation. He spread beyond Africa and conquered the lands of the other tribes.

He started the evolution of ‘economics’, of tools of war.

Yet his victory was short-lived. Very few of those initial men are left today.

The last data proves that in Europe there are hardly a 6% of people coming from that age. They are Basques, some Scandinavians, strong people that remind us of the cave men. Yet 80% of Europeans come from a new ‘radiation’, around 20.000 years ago.

Undoubtedly a new weapon carried by smaller men, which however proved itself efficient enough to wipe out the javelin men of the age of caves. Moreover, those people resisted the next more peaceful waves of Neolithic farmers and food collectors.

What kind of weapon could achieve that massive massacre of human beings; and impose itself to originate the Europeans and perhaps the majority of other races?

 

The bow, the first machine, the first animetal.

 

It was very likely the bow, the first machine. A machine is defined as an ‘Universal organism’, made of a material stronger than carbolife, and able to transform cyclical movement into lineal energy and vice versa.

The most simple machine is the bow. The tension of the arm [lineal energy] become a cyclical tension, which again transforms itself into lineal energy [the arrow]. The bow becomes in this manner a powerful weapon able to kill at distance. It is to the old age, what the gunboat would be to the modern age: a weapon that can kill many people, far away, without need of communication. We can imagine that the process of massive extinction that gunboats and rifles brought to the Australians or Indians, imposing the genes of White men, within a century, was the same process that caused the extinction of all men at the hands of archer tribes.

The strategy of the weapon influenced that extinction: archers do not communicate with the enemy. They rather ambush and kill them at distance. So there is no ‘sense of community’ with the enemy, no contact. Hordes of archers from an initial tribe, where the bow was discovered [hence possessing the same Y-chromosome], probably expanded, in circles extinguishing as they multiplied the neighbor tribes. They probably inseminated many females, killing systematically only their male-warriors – as the Conquistadors went into extinguishing the Caribbean Indians, and took their women as wives-servants.

They are the first ‘animetals’.  Even if those primitive arrows had not yet metal points, they are already machines of war, that provoke the same biological effect of extinction of other human beings, that more sophisticated animetal would provoke.

They also cause the extinction of the previous culture of Hunters, which used long spears and stone axes, to attack huge animals. He who had extinguished the Neanderthal becomes extinct himself.

The ‘extinction’ of the Cave man is a slow process that will leave their final rituals in painted caves. Perhaps the last survivors of that civilization were the men that painted in South-France, their final swan songs.

The artistic record is impressive. In Spain is crystal clear. In the north strong men [there have been archeological findings of men over 6’3, such as the Morin man], paint in caves, their epic fights with animals. They are waging warfare mainly with the animal kingdom, and other Homos unable to speak. Yet there is no signs of war between human tribes.

The growth of ‘evilness’ which constantly increases in history of men killing other men, had barely jumped from the philosophical age of talking women, in the age of javelin hunters.

Suddenly to the East, in the Mediterranean coast of Spain appears a new civilization and a new kind of painting. They are paintings outside the caves. In the open landscape.

They show for the first time in History men killing men, feasting on war, groups of archers throwing their bows in herds against other human beings. Cruelty, and war has increased geometrically with the arrival of weapons. Now evil=anti-live, is recalled by artists, who are proud of their warriors. Now the age of animetal starts.

So the same evolutionary and extinctive processes of life beings observed in the pre-Human Earth, takes place again during the Human adventure, among human beings, through the organism of history, guided now by technological evolution.

 

Technological radiations Vs Human good radiations: the Neolithic.

 

The genes of the first Eve, the first Homo Sapiens are still with us. So human races are not the main characters of the extinctive radiations of history. Technology is.

Species are not only a body-brain system, but also its vital space, its property and territories of order, its technology.

So hordes of Homo Sapiens with better technology, with cultures more efficient delivering information and energy, do radiate in History and extinguish previous species.

On the other hand the ‘radiations of human goods’, of verbal thought, of agriculture, are slower, and they are not criminal in the same degree that radiations of weapons are. This still happens today. This happened in the past.

Again in the eternal beat of the Universe, is the woman who advances societies to the next level of creativity with the arrival of agriculture.

Women carry the agricultural wave. They observe the cycles of plants and find food.

For centuries archeologists thought the Neolithic farmers destroyed all other humans.

I disagreed deeply. Agriculture is a human good, not a weapon. So its radiation had to be essentially peaceful, communicative. As human goods do.

Finally genetics gives me reason.

It turns out that unlike the radiation of archers that imposed itself extinguishing the javelin man, till accounting for more than 80% of present European blood, the radiation of agriculture only leaves a 10% in the genetic pool of Europe. This means it is a peaceful radiation. Matriarchal societies expand peacefully and communicate their knowledge to the archers of the previous radiation that learn how to cultivate food.

This happens soon after the agricultural radiation originating in Levante and Mesopotamia, starts its peaceful expansion.

We call that the Neolithic. Around 10.ooo BC, the radiation of the Neolithic starts. Around 5000 BC it has colonized the best territories, and the cornered culture of the Homo Paleolithic dies away, improved by the acquisition of new, enjoyable goods.

Ceramics appears. Art multiplies. Abstract thought, a higher level of understanding of reality spreads. Verbal thought develops. Burials become sophisticated. It is an age of Women power, of human goods, of matriarchal societies, of abundance, of fat Venus, the paradise age, the age of Genesis.

Historians do not like to talk of evolution Vs devolution in history, of human goods Vs Metal goods, because they are mainly male, obsessed by the ‘civilization of weapons’ the animetal civilization they have created.

They would prefer men to be different from other biological beings, superior, and women stupid, inferior. They love the haughty remains, tombs and palaces, missiles and tanks of their make ancestors.

They do not like the politically incorrect fact that man drives man into extinction. That men destroy and women create. Yet this is a book about the hard truths of history and the role of men in History. The main hard truth common to all Universal events is the Darwinian phenomena of radiations of top predator species that extinguish other top predators. Such is the role of men. The damnation of genesis.

 

Male warriors.  The age of metal.

 

If the pre-history of the Paleolithic and Neolithic shows that cultural radiations extinguish previous cultures, the Historical ages, with much more remains, are even more conclusive about the radiating process. The archer, is not the last extinctive radiation in History. Once more new weapons are discovered, and males again displace the Neolithic Paradise of fertility cults and social happiness.

It is the age of metals, and the mathematical languages that evolve its species…

An age with periodic radiations of weapons, that as we shall see are the fundamental cause of the periodic extinction of civilizations and their collective mind, their artistic forms.

 

Human Animetals: Species Of Metal And Carbolife

 

Animetals, are symbiotic organisms made of a metal-species plus a human being. The human being acts as the “dominant, living element” of the process. Our three elements that define a living species are present in animetals. For example a railroad is an animetal organism composed of an energy organ, an “iron horse” [body] + an informative organ, a human driver, and a reproductive organism, a Company-mother.

So, as the Indians did, we could call the railroad an iron horse, a living organism. All living organisms create changes in the energy and information levels of their ecosystem, prey on rival species and transform that ecosystem to their image and resemblance. So happens with animetals. Their living activities cause the extinction of other living organisms, the preying on nature, and the transformation of the vital space through which the railroad or other animetal moves.

So “biological radiations” of machines are the essence of an eco[nomic]system, and the fundamental “event” that shapes the political, scientific and economical facts of the modern world. Men like to be animetals and use metal-organs to  ab=use life with them. If men don’t change that attitude metal will continue to pray on carbolife.

An animetal is an organism composed of both, human and metal organs of energy or information. Those metal-organisms of energy and information are stronger, faster, bigger, more powerful than human bodies and minds. So when we combine a machine and a human being, we obtain a symbiotic species [as when we combine the soft body of a crab with its shell] stronger than the individual parts. That is the reason we use machines: they give us more informative and energetic power. At the same time, because of their higher quality, machines replace and supersede humans  in tasks of labor and war. We prefer a computer to a worker, a weapon to a soldier. In this manner men are displaced from jobs and killed in fields of war  by more efficient machines.

 

Animetals, Top Predators In History: The Animetal Vs The Human Being

 

What are the individual and social Top Predators of History and Economics? The most advanced energy and information species, at individual and collective levels of the Earth’s eco[system]. Throughout history, they were all human beings. Today, they are what we call animetals, symbiotic species that fuse a human and a metal-species. In the future they will be metalife, pure metal species with chips for brains.

Are we  taking the biological comparison too far when we use terms like animetals? We think not. Try to be objective and look at  history, the kings and warriors that have preceded today’s modern technology. Now recall the crab with its house of armor. Most kings and warriors were covered by iron-armor, or had an iron-sword at their side. That was his source of power which made them stronger than other humans. They are animetals, adapted to metal, a cross between an animal and metal. What main species of animetals exist? Warriors: an energy enzyman which is attached to a metal-energy weapon. Traders: a cyclical enzyman attached to informative metal [money]. Or scientists: a complex enzyman, attached to a metal-sensorial instrument. If you look at history, you will realize that such enhanced humans, warriors [men+weapon], traders [men+money], and scientists [men+metal sensorial machine], control the energy and information of history. They are also symbiotic species to metal, different from the communal, verbal, religious farmers that preceded them. They no longer protect the carbolife from where they originated. They protect metal and support the evolution of money and machines. You cannot truly call them human. Either weapons or money have become their energy and information. They are enzymen, catalysts of Metal-reproduction, because to hold extra-power, they will evolve their weapons and machines, and control other humans with them.

In the same manner that enzymes in the body evolve carbohydrates, enzymen evolve metal-species. On the other hand, the increasing complexity of machines, which today also have information systems of an electric/electronic nature, allow us to use the term “metalife,” which is much more descriptive of the organic functions of those machines that the term machine. The Indians who called railroads “iron horses” because they perceived a “living Universe,” were more in tune with a biological analysis of History.

The question is: over whom do enzymen and animetals prey? The answer is: on living species and human, nature-based cultures whose vital space they absorb. This is clear in History. In our Indian example, the American animetals preyed on the nature-based culture of Indians until their near- extinction.  Carbolife humans and carbolife horses were made extinct by enzymen and railroads. Now, that vital space belongs to American enzymen and their machines of transport. There are few prairies to feed horses, but many oil-pumps to feed machines. We have few sanctuaries for the protection of carbolife [forests, hills, open space preserves], but we have many sanctuaries that are metal-territories [temples of Go[l]d, icon-cities, TV-altars, Car-museums]. Once again, animetals have erased life-based cultures, and substituted “their horses and Gods by iron-horses and Go[l]ds.” Life is extinct by metal. Metal preys on humanity.

Since the arrival of Go[l]d and weapons, traders and warriors, are building metal networks of information and energy on the Earth’s surface. Today those networks of the living Metal-earth have eliminated the human component transforming the body of Earth, into pure metal networks [from internet to  atomic weapons ruled by computer networks].


6: The fight of ecosystems on Earth:  History Vs Economics.

 

The myth of superman

 

Our analysis of Human Ethics&Aesthetics bring us to a final reflection on the nature of the Human Masters, the great artists of verbal and visual wor[l]ds that have confronted throughout History, the Metal masters,  warriors, traders and scientists that base their power, not in their own senses and biological nature, but in the power of energy-metal [lines of metal or weapons from swords to missiles, cycles of metal, or money, and metal-minds or scientific instruments].

Human Masters who ‘think more and see more’, are the true masters of mankind. Since mankind is a mental race – his body is not even the strongest of all carbolife species – and the master artist is the most developed human mental race, it is the artist, the ‘super-man’, not the warrior, or the scientist, that rely on weapons and metal-minds, to power up their bodies and minds. This was the vision of the Greek philosophers, and it is the biological truth. Hence, human masters, masters of the wor[l]d should rule human societies, as Plato wisely understood. They do not rule our societies, because warriors, traders and scientists, impose their power with the help of their metal. Even worse, some of our societies are ruled ‘at distance’ by the me[n]tal intelligence of money, by the biological laws of economics, that make of each man a mere consumer=tester and worker=reproducer of machines, without freedom. Yet those are political themes, on the ‘myths of human freedom’, in present money-controlled democracies, that go beyond the scope of this book.

The fact is that both kind of mental masters, artists and prophets of love religions, Vs animetals and prophets of gold and weapons, have opposed and fought to impose their ecosystems and species, as top predator minds and ecosystems on the Earth.

We talk in that sense of a paradox, the paradox of History that structures our societies in two clear groups: those in favor of human, historic ecosystems, and those in favor of metal ecosystems. At one side the prophets and common people, on the other side, the warriors and scientists, the industrialists that use weapons, money and machines to rule society.

The 3 linguistic ages of mankind

On that view, we can talk of 3 ages of science, of human knowledge, of the human mind.

We say that in the first age of History knowledge was verbal, and based in the obvious truths of the living Universe.

In all those traditions knowledge uses two parameters in its understanding of the Universe, Space and Time, or Energy and information, or Yang and Yin, or Body and spirit. All parallel concepts. Most verbal definitions previous to Galileo’s analysis of Time with a clock, seem to be in a general agreement, both in Greek philosophers, and Eastern thinkers, which evolved verbal science far more than western, western scientists:

The Universe was  made of cyclical minds of information, and vital spaces, where those minds in words of Aristotle, became Gods-centers of all energies.

The Greeks and Eastern thinkers believed in a Universe made of body-minds of all kind of types.

The second age of history of knowledge is brought by the scientific method, by companies reproducers of metal-machines and by mathematics.

Verbal thought declines as organ of informative truths, displaced by mathematics. The way man observes the Universe changes also, due to the abstract nature of mathematical truths.

Euclid, Descartes, Galilee and Newton, invented something that does not exist in reality: the Continuous lineal graph of mathematics related to speed variables and the principle of lineal inertia, so useful in weapon’s research. When Einstein believed that such graphic was reality, the continuous time-space becomes a dogma of modern physics, that limits the advance of Relativistic science.

So the scientific Universe remains abstract and dead.

This however was false. As the scientific method discovered more flows of communication in the Universe, it came the third age of History of knowledge, or relativistic age, that shows a Universe of infinite, relative frames of reference, and organic beings.

We talk of the age of relativistic science,  where no longer a given language of perception [images, mathematics or words] carry the total truth but merely represent a mind which observes reality from a certain perspective.

So the real truth of the Universe, is that languages and the species that speak those languages fight for survival. The laws of survival of languages and their species are far more relevant truths that the way in which each language describes the Universe.

 

We talk of social religions of love, as the highest verbal mode of analogic thought. While relativity theory and Non-Euclidean geometry represent the peak of analogic thought in mathematics that never has been applied to science itself, and the scientific method as a relative form of truth, that favors machines and mathematics more than men and verbal, languages.

Unfortunately this state of relativity of knowledge has only been hinted at in verbal societies; while mathematics has developed it far more. Hence the present differential of complexity between human verbal ideologies of dramatic or A-logic character, and mathematical products [weapons, networks, scientific knowledge, chips] evolved into Complex logic systems of human control [stocks-nations, informatic networks, networks of digital images, simultaneously programming masses of human believers.]

 

Human, Verbal  Wor[l]ds Vs digital languages, animetals and machines.

 

Most civilizations have been ruled by animetals, specially warriors. Why? Because machines and species of metal, give them power. And among them the most powerful ones, the most perfect machines are weapons.

Weapons are also the species of metal that prey in a greater manner over human beings.

Weapons “extinguish” life, and “energize” the evolution and reproduction of machines which increases in war. On the other hand, men are killed by war. We can express this in a formula, the Paradox of History:

 

Max. war=Max. metal evolution=Max. Human devolution=Min Human Goods

 

In biological terms we say that species of metal energy preys on human energy, the bodies of cellular men. Does money also prey on verbal information? Does money corrupt ideologies of verbal thought? It is obvious that money and the species it helps to reproduce [weapons, metal-communicators such as TVs] prey on and substitute verbal ethics, and religions of love… Ethics and Economics have always been opposed.

In History metal-species created by man, prey on Human verbal networks and cultures.

Technological nations are by essence, in scientific=evolutionary terms evil=extinctive civilizations. For example Nazis  “extinguished” millions of humans, despite the fact that “technology” never evolved more during history than in Germany during the ages of Prussian militarism and its later decadent version – Nazism. Germany split the atom for the first time and bred the people who invented the A-bomb. They developed modern chemistry, modern physics, most of the present machines, the first digital computer.

They were the embodiment of the scientific method. Metal-Historians who think metal only means progress for man, have always been puzzled by such contradictions. Was Germany a great  or a bad nation?

Biological history explains it without contradiction, through an evolutionary analysis of history. Since in biological thought, modern science made with clocks and telescopes is not only a form of knowledge but  also a method of creation of ‘sensorial machines’ and weapons which kill humans. So science is bad-extinctive, and the reproduction of scientific weapons is bad-extinctive. Nazis were nazis precisely because they were the most technologically evolved nation, where verbal truths of History were more corrupted, and social evolution totally ignored.  A warning for nations who put technology and science over human rights and ethics.

Do not confuse knowledge with the scientific method that makes clocks and telescopes -machines- the valuators of truths. Knowledge and truth might be gathered in words, even if science considers them inferior to digital thought.


7. The 2 ages of history.

 

All this said, it is evident that we can divide the history of mankind, in 2 ages, that correspond to the dominance of the two basic languages of man:

– After the birth of languages in the pre-historic age of man during the Paleolithic, in which the first men appeared as verbal species, verbal thought the main language of mankind, learnt how to preserve itself through time, either in memorial conservation – from poet to poet, from believer to believer, as it happened in India till very recently – or in texts written on artistic media.

We consider that it starts then the mature age of man or…

 

– The mature age of Verbal languages. It is the first historic age. The age of verbal science and verbal religion that explained with words the nature of the Universe, and the way man had to use verbal information to create social organisms, in which words and laws, and ethic religions acted as nervous impulses that controlled and organized masses of human cells.

 

– And the age of mathematical languages. Which developed science, mathematical design of machines, and monetary societies. It is also the third age of verbal languages as those verbal languages no longer control human societies, and become fiction. Laws become corrupted. Religions become ritualistic and forget the prophetic words, making of money the center of their power. And literature no longer is realist and describes human existence, or is philosophical and tries to explain the Universe, but becomes fiction, dream-like accounts of the individual life of a few people.

 

In the beginning of history verbal languages dominated over mathematical language. So we talk in History of two ages of knowledge. The age of words, and the age of mathematics. Both carried subjective truthness, and information, hence both were valid. The difference is that the verbal age was the human age, since men are top predator species of verbal thought. While the mathematical age is the age of machines, because machines are designed with mathematics, perceive the universe with mathematical concepts, and think in computer machines much better with mathematics that we men do.

So we also parallel the age of mathematics with the age of the extinction and degradation of rival verbal languages, rival human verbal brains, and ultimately rival human species, that compete with mathematical machines, as workers, soldiers, thinkers, and recently (witness the scandal of the American Presidential Voting), electors of the governments of this planet. In that sense we have to be aware that knowledge is also a bio-logical concept. The evolution of knowledge is the evolution of the language of the mind, not ‘an objective thing’ unrelated to those languages.

 

 

 

 

The evolution of knowledge is evolution of the languages of the mind

 

Knowledge obviously is the accumulation of information about reality with the human mind.

What is then the human mind?

Here is when an objective analysis brings a rather simple, yet enlightening answer: Your mind is an organic system that processes languages of perception. Those languages of perception are basically two: sight and sounds, from where the two languages of human knowledge derive, numbers and words.

What do numbers and words, eyes and sounds perceive?

Eyes and numbers perceive space.

Verbal words and sounds perceive time. Words are verbal constructions that talk about events in time. Mathematics are geometrical games that explain events in space.

So we come to the conclusion that the human mind is a ‘being that exists in space and time’ and so it perceives space and time.

You are a mind that perceives time and space. That is the nature of your existence. You perceive time with words, with verbs. You perceive space with eyes, with images. That is your connection to reality. The evolution of the human mind, of our words of comprehension of time, and our perception of images [either thorough art, or mathematics], is the very essence of knowledge.

So to know, is to develop the two languages of the human mind, words and images, [simplified by mathematics], and the comprehension they bring us of the events of time, and the forms of space…

Once this is clear it is easy to understand knowledge and science as a process of evolution of human languages, and the information we collect with those languages.

 

The 2 Ages of Science. The 2 ages of knowledge.

 

History does not evolve human bodies, but human languages. This is evident. Our species exists as such since perhaps 150.000 years, since the arrival of verbal languages, without real changes of morphology. It is then verbal and mathematical knowledge, the virtual worlds and the mind of man what evolves in history.

Thus, we talk of 2 ages of human knowledge, according to the evolution and predominance of the different languages of the human mind.

– The verbal age of knowledge, represented by Taoism, Buddhism, philosophy and religion. It is the age of perception of time, with words an verbs, with ‘3 dimensions’, past, present and future.

– The mathematical age of  the scientific method, started in ±1602.

Humans changed the perception of space and time, no longer observed with words, but with clocks, and numbers.

Yet in both ages man has tried to answer the natural questions perceived by the mind and its languages: what is time and space, what are the nature of the changes, creations and extinctions that take place in that Universe?

8. The age of words and verbal science.

 

In the age of words, man tries to explain the changes that take place in space and time, using names [which design beings that exist in space] and verbs [which design actions that take place in time between beings of space, using past, present, and future verbs]. The result is the existence of a certain ‘Universal grammar’, or ‘verbal syntax’ common to most verbal expressions: Name [spatial subject] verb (temporal action) Name [spatial object].

That verbal syntax basically says that all events in the Universe relate two species or forms of space, through processes of communication that takes place in time.

It also says that man [the subject] is the center of all those sentences, the actor of the verb, and hence it is the center of the Universe.

Verbal syntax is anthropomorphic. The minute you say a sentence you will probably say “I did that’, and you will become the center of the Universe.

Still we know this is false. We know we are not the center of the Universe. So we talk of the first age of verbal science, as an age of anthropomorphic knowledge, in which man is the subject of all things, and the word is the only language of truth. Today this concept of reality still lingers in western verbal religions. However as time went by, such simple idea of the Universe, derived of the ‘biological syntax’ of words, evolved into concepts more akin to the experimental reality of the Universe.

This happened among the ‘verbal scientists’ of the Eastern World.

We might call it the ‘objective, or relativistic school of thought’, as opposed to the ‘subjective or absolutist school of western thought’.

The culmination of such verbal school of science took place in a brief period between the VI and IV centuries before Christ [Christ himself can be considered the fundamental philosopher of the subjective vision of the Universe, with men-God as the center of all things]. It gave us the work of a series of verbal genius in Greece and Asia – Lao-Tse, Buddha, Aristotle, Plato – which developed a verbal cosmology, coherent with the perceived nature of Change in the Universe of space-time beings.

They answered our ‘fundamental question: the causes and nature of the creation, evolution and destruction of space-time beings”.

 

To understand their answer we might have to clarify some ‘words’, which are synonymous, since those philosophers in general used instead of the modern, scientific concepts of space and time, two different concepts that talked of the same, the concepts of a Universe of space, and a God that ruled the changes, the times of beings…

 

What is God and what is the Universe.

 

God, and the Universe are the two great mysteries, the two great macrocosms about which man has always inquired.

It is possible to know God and the Universe, as the great thinkers of the verbal age, from Aristotle to Buddha thought? I believe it is possible. However before trying to answer that question properly we have to define what most people mean with those words. Since there are several definitions of God and the Universe, we better agree on what is the field of our inquire according to the opinion of most people…

By ‘The Universe’ most men understand the reality we perceive through our eyes, the spatial reality.  The Universe is “All what exists”.

By ‘God’ most men understand the ‘intelligence’ of that Universe. Which manifests itself, through the changes that take place in the Universe.

God is for Greek philosophers the Logos of the Universe, the laws that cause the constant change of reality. It is the Tao of Change in Chinese words. God is the Creator, and Cause of the lives and deaths [the changes] of the Universe in Western Religions.

The concept of God turns out to be similar. It is always the same idea of an intelligence that causes Changes. The Eastern man, and the scientist, think the creator is inside reality. Western religions think the creator is outside reality. But for both cultures God is the cause, the logic of change.

The expression “Laws of Change” is a synonymous of the “thoughts of God”.

Those Thoughts of God are the subject of our inquire…

Indeed, since all those concepts of God are synonymous of change we have found the right question to inquire the nature of God: ‘change’. What causes change? What are the laws of change? Can we control those laws; can we influence God? Those are the questions of this book.

 

Change happens in Time, the Universe happens in Space.

 

Can we relate the philosophical idea of change-God to a ‘real’ concept within the reach of human understanding? We can.

Since Change takes place in Time, we could say that God is the master of time.

The Laws of Change are the laws of Time.

If the Universe is a physical, spatial reality, God and His Laws are a temporal, logical form.

We could say that the Universe is about Space; and God is  about Time.

Because reality exists in Space; and change exists in Time.

 

Thus we have created a bridge between the abstract concepts of God and the Universe, and the scientific concepts of Time=Change and Space=Reality.

 

It is basically the same bridge, earlier Taoists and Buddhists created many centuries ago.

They said that God is Time, is change. That the logic of God, was the cause of change in the species of reality, in the spatial beings of the Universe.

 

Those laws of change were explained in simple terms by Taoists and Buddhists using two terms, yin and yang, that are quite equivalent to the modern terms of information and energy. The species of the Universe shared and transformed energy and information. The way they shared and transformed that energy and information followed certain rules, which were the rules of change, the logic of God.

As we go along the pages of this book we will see that essentially such ideas are right. The Universe is a game of communication of two substances that we will call spatial energy and  temporal information. The sum of all those spatial energies and temporal informations are the Total Universe.

However we only perceive of that total Universe a part of the absolute spatial energy and temporal information the total Universe stores…

Where is the rest of that spatial energy and temporal information?

The answer is: ‘beyond our perception, in parallel Universes perceived with other forces such as gravitation’.

This conclusion reached by modern science in the last years, through the language of mathematics, is the best explanation we have found to Reality. Curiously enough was also the explanation reached with verbal languages, by the scientists of the age of words…

Indeed, Eastern philosophers considered that knowledge was relative to perception, and human perception was limited by our understanding of spatial energy [yang], and temporal information [yin], with two basic languages, sight and words…

Therefore we cannot know the Total Universe in itself, but we can only perceive through the interposed ‘screen’ of languages, an image, or representation of the Universe. In the same manner that a mirror is not the being in itself, but only a part of the information the being stores, the senses and languages of man do not perceive the absolute truth, but only a part of it.

Man perceives with his eyes space, and with his verbs time, but – affirmed Taoist and Buddhist philosophers – there exist many other intelligent beings in the Universe, that perceive reality with other languages [smells, other colors, magnetic forces, gravitational forces, chemical impulses, etc.].

The Chinese even invented an entire branch of medicine that worked, based in the concept that your body has an underlying structure perhaps of magnetic nature, like a scheme of your body, that we cannot perceive, but we can influence with metal-needles…

 

In search of an indirect method of truthness.

 

Today, the last advances of morphological sciences give reason to the Chinese. There are multiple processes of growth which are not ‘random’ but followed certain mathematical structures common to magnetic and gravitational fields, called ‘spirals’, and ‘cardioids’.

So you grow according to a  common gravitational and magnetic deformation of space-time called a spiral and a cardioid. When we apply to a child’s head a mathematical tool called a ‘cardioid transformation’, your head grows to acquire the form of an adult.

Is it that growth ruled by the necessary growth of the magnetic-gravitational blue-print, which underlies your bone-structure?

Since we do not perceive gravitation, only indirect proves can answer that question.

This might trouble ‘classic scientists’ that as ‘anthropomorphic religions’ do not want to limit the fantasy that man can perceive it all and know it all with absolute certainty.

Yet it is necessary to accept that we exist in a virtual world, creation of the mind which is not necessarily the total Universe, or even the world that other sensorial species perceive.

The Universe is a ‘linguistic representation’ of words and images, as the Universe a computer perceives is a linguistic representation of numbers and the Universe of a dog, a representation of smells, and images…

A tree has a chemical map of the Universe, a star has perhaps a gravitational mind, [for Eastern people celestial bodies were living beings, hence their development of astrology] a man a visual and verbal mind…

So the big question is: how can we study the logic of change, that guides the actions and changes of all those beings?

Again Eastern philosophers came with what it seems the right answer:

Since we know the ‘logic of change’, the effects of Time in Space, for a lot of species, and all those species, when analyzed in depth, follow certain basic ruled laid down by those philosophers, it is logic to affirm that all other species not-perceived by our senses will follow the same rules.

This is in essence the way science works. You boil water with heat one thousand times, and it is the same process, so you ‘extrapolate’ a law: ‘heat boils water’.

Eastern philosophers said: ‘the changes of space, the changes of all beings we perceive, follow the rules of ‘yang-spatial energy’, and ‘yin-temporal information’. So those laws should also rule the species, and dimensions of space-time we do not perceive. Thus, those rules are the laws of God, the Total Change, the Laws of the Universe, the Total Space.

 

They had found what we might call the ‘homologic’, or ‘analogic’, or ‘biologic’ method of knowledge. Since those rules were based in homologies, analogies, and further on, as described by Eastern scientists, were rules common to living and non-living species…

 

The homologic, biologic method.

 

Eastern philosophers  accepted a biologic Universe, a living Universe, where beings with different minds see ‘parallel Universes’, virtual mas of reality, logic models, mirrors of reality, which helped them to act and survive in the Universe.

When this became evident to the Hindi and Chinese philosophers, the great masters of those two cultures, Lao-Tse, and Buddha, established certain bio-logic rules of behavior in that Living Universe.

In modern terms, we could say that Chinese discovered the laws of transformation of energy into information, and vice versa. For example they affirmed:

‘Energy [spatial yang] never dies, but constantly transforms itself into temporal information [yin]”

“The transformation of energy into information follows 3 morphological ‘horizons’ or ‘ages’, which takes place in all species of space-time”.

“All Universal systems need a minimal quantity of both components, to exist, a ‘body of energy’, and a ‘mind of information’.”

And so on…

Those laws that merged biological and physical concepts about time, space, energy, information, life, and death, existence and extinction…

They were simple, based in a few observations [the Asians had not complex instruments of science]. Yet perhaps because of their simplicity, they were truly generic; they could apply to all Universal beings, and so they could be rightly considered as fundamental laws of God and the Universe, of the way Time changes the spatial reality.

They have inspired my research. As I went along discovering those laws, out of my knowledge of science and my analysis of multiple space-times, I found them also in Eastern religions. Which confirmed me I was in the right path, since people from another age, and culture had found the same concepts, observing the Universe and God…

 

Regarding the laws of behavior in that Universe, the Asians also laid down simple, effective laws to enhance the survival of humankind.

Buddha insisted that men should kill only those species it required to feed on, since all beings had a soul-mind, all species had a virtual image of the Universe, and therefore were living beings. It was the biological law of action-reaction: if you gave a bad ‘karma’ [bad energy or information] to another being, the other being to balance the total Universe, would send you the same bad karma [bad energy and information] that could destroy you.

If we respected the life of those beings, those beings would respect us. Such Universal law of behavior was the key to survive in the Universe… Lao-Tse also came to the conclusion that men should be careful with the way it interfered in the natural processes of life and death, since the forces at work ‘the logic laws of change’, the laws of God, were too powerful and we men should merely strive to understand them, and rule our lives according to them.

 

So we have to conclude that the verbal age of science, reached coherent and efficient answers to the great questions of mankind. It explained the Universe as a game of spatial and temporal parameters. It understood the existence of many ‘dimensions’ in that Universe beyond our world of light. It developed an ethic vision of our role in the Universe according to his nature. When applied correctly it created human societies harmonic with nature, and those Universal laws of change. The aim of those societies was to survive, to repeat its ‘cycles of existence’, and control to the benefit of man the process of change. The Chinese were specially successful at that; and we can justly said they managed to keep their society unchanged, healthy and growing longer than any other human society ever.

 

I consider that through those Eastern philosophies, in the golden age of the scientific word, which has its summit in earlier Taoist and Buddhist thought, men evolved mentally, and matured on its verbal perception of the Universe, from a simple age of language, of subjective, syntactic, anthropomorphic, dogmatic, nature, to an age of complex language, of objective, semantic, universal, relativistic nature.

Even the verbal and visual-mathematical language was put in perspective as a mere instrument of human subjective knowledge, unable to give us the absolute truth-information of the Universe. If absolute truth was impossible, what was then the purpose of knowledge? Obviously not a theoretical, dogmatic purpose, but a rather pragmatic reason:

To help the probabilities of human survival, by guiding our acts in accordance with the Laws of Change; and specially by building a general sense of respect, and precaution about all the phenomena we did not understand.

 

However that intelligent evolution of the word did not take place in the western world. Except in the work of a few Greek philosophers, verbal knowledge about the Universe, withered away in Europe, defeated by earlier anthropomorphic theories of man as the center of the Universe. Those ‘dogmatic ideas’ became nationalistic, racist, and religious ideologies, that affirmed the supremacy of man-God over the Universe. They were not promoted by the power of reason, but by the force of violence. They still exist for a simple reason: you can kill those who hold the truth, and then nobody opposes your truth. The expansion of Western civilization and those ideologies by violent methods do not imply however the evolution of its verbal ideas about the Universe, but of its weapons of mass-destruction…

More over the different degree of evolution of the word in western and eastern societies had grave consequences in the second age of knowledge, the age of mathematical science, since mathematics as the new language of truth and perception, evolved in Europe where the word was in a primitive state of knowledge, not in Asia, where words had developed in full, and could have eased the path of mathematics towards ‘relativistic knowledge’.

 


9. The age of mathematics.

 

The age of metal and mathematics.

 

All this said is obvious that man can understand and understood the universe also in verbal terms, not only in mathematical terms, in that sense we can also talk of ‘ages of knowledge’ that jump from language to language, and make man not necessarily more intelligent, since each language has to evolve again through its 3 ages as a mirror of the Universe. Today mathematics is the dominant language, but as we saw with money, it does not necessarily improves the human understanding of the universe…

Knowledge is the key to understand history. Linguistic knowledge, the virtual worlds and the memory of man is what evolves in History.

We can relate the great ages of History, with the evolution of its informative organs, from verbal thought [age of prophets] to mathematical thought [age of pricing] and finally to digital thought [age of images]. This is specially truth when we talk of the age of written records, or classic concept of History, in which human knowledge and the products men construct with that knowledge establish the rhythms of History.

We talk of 3 ages of human knowledge.

– The verbal age of Taoism, Buddhism and religions of the living Universe.

– The mathematical age of pricing and the scientific method, started in ±1602

– The digital age of metal minds, researched by the scientific method, which moves knowledge outside the realm of human existence. Which starts in the XX century.

The essence of the two digital ages, is the adaptation of human truths to digital truths. Each language perceives the Universe in a way or other. It does not mean a certain perception is better. Science makes of numbers and metal senses a method of truth higher than verbal thought. So it adapts the verbal, visual truths of man, to the perception of metal-senses, and the errors that digital languages introduce in their adaptation of reality.

When you see with a human eye you transform truths into images and verbal languages. You introduce errors – such as the error of seeing a film in continuity, when it is discontinuous, broken by black patterns.

Digital languages also have errors of “continuity”. The main of such errors is to use numbers to describe human beings. Since numbers simplify into abstractions living beings, and so they no longer concern with survival…

It is the use of numbers to describe mankind, the main consequence of the change of languages in the Earth, a change in the very syntax and subconscious manner we value human beings.

 

The second age of science is therefore the age of mathematics, which starts in Greece with Euclid and his 5 geometric postulates. Since we are in the western world, where the word is anthropomorphic, and considered an absolute truth, when mathematics substitutes words as the language of knowledge, the same absolutist, dogmatic concept of truth is applied to the new language. Now Euclidean mathematics becomes the supreme language of truth.

Euclidean science considers the Universe a mathematical object, described perfectly by geometry. Newton said the Universe is a clock because he uses a clock to measure space-time. Galilee and Descartes affirmed that all the space of the Universe can be represented in a graph [the Cartesian graph], based in their light-eye perception. Space is what the eye sees and mathematics describes in that plane… There is nothing beyond that space…

Kepler goes further and considers that only man and God are intelligent because both understand mathematics: “God has waited 5000 years [since the biblical creation] to find a mind parallel to his [the mind of Kepler]”. Such arrogance of the western scientist is similar to the arrogance of the western believer in anthropomorphic religions.

Mathematical science creates also a dogma, now mathematical, that considers mathematical definition of space and time as absolute truths. It is called the ‘scientific method’. Only what we experience with human eyes or human instruments is space. Only what we measure with clocks is time.

 

The Errors Of digital languages

 

Mathematics are not the absolute “truth” of the reality it describes, but a language of perception as smell, words or sight might be, in the sense that it merely acts as a mirror of certain Universal information. It does not carry all the information of the Universe. What does mathematics ignore?

We can answer the question backwards. What is the origin of mathematical, geometrical information? Mathematics is mainly a spatial, visual language, derived of the geometry of the Human eye, and the three dimensions of light, [width-magnetic field, height-electric field, and length-speed]. So geometry [mathematics] becomes the spatial scanner of man. The enormous speed of light gives light minimal temporal information about our environment [the Earth’s crust], and maximum spatial information. We observe the spatial instantaneous world with light and geometry, not the temporal changes on this world. Mathematics lacks temporal dimension. Mathematics measures time processes, only in an abstract manner. For this reason mathematics do not explain properly events concerned with change in time, like “morals,” or survival. Man improves such defect of eye-mathematics with verbal thought, the time scanner of man, concerned unlike mathematics with temporal events, such as death, life, survival and extinction.

Moral words and “Theory of Evolution” are temporal languages. All species require to understand time to survive. When men changed his sense of truth from words to mathematics and images, he lost that sense of time, of survival. Today our children play with guns, because in images – not in words – murder is beautiful. Scientists construct robots, because in mathematics – not in words – robots are beautiful. In all that is concerned with survival and existence -a temporal function- verbal thought is much more intelligent than mathematics. For that reason in a healthy organism of history, verbal thought should control mathematical truths. Since the survival and existence of man, is more important than our knowledge of spatial images and abstract numbers.

 

The Lethal Properties of Digital Economics

 

This is precisely what abstract economics does, since it promotes the mathematical abstraction of price, where man is equalized to machines in fields of labor and consumption, thanks to the abstract concept of a price-number, or monetary measures that value both, inanimate objects and human lives: man=price [number]=product. Scientists and economists forget that survival is temporal and has to be argued in verbal terms. Mathematics is spatial and should be used only for spatial matters. We should not make decisions about the survival and extinction of human species in mathematical terms.

 Since mathematics do not have the capacity to describe temporal values, when science makes abstract decisions, it forgets the temporal survival consequences of those decisions. Words however have ‘meanings’, values introduced in the word, which have a subjective human origin, based on the human survival function. If we say, we are going to replace 100 “families” with 10 “computers,” we have information from the perspective of human “families.” In the verbal case there is a natural resistance to accept the event as just, since it eliminates the job of 100 human families.  If we say 100 > 10, we eliminate labor of higher cost. In mathematics, men become abstract numbers and we ignore their human value. Mathematics of pricing attempts in this manner against human rights. Mathematics describe the event in abstract, non human terms. Verbal thought in vital, human terms. Scientists tend to deny the limits of truth of mathematics. Yet since reality is guided by languages, the enormous arrogance of mathematical scientists that apply digital equalities to all species including man, spreads the  lethal properties of mathematics to all fields of human existence.

Why mathematics seem abstract to us?

The answer is that Cartesian mathematics are based on abstract postulates created by Euclid which reduce all species to mere points. Euclidean postulates simplify the vital Universe, into a game of mathematical points, by eliminating the internal, organic parts of points.

100 [humans] eliminate the content, texture, form, and properties of the human. Now they are 100 points in a Cartesian graph that can be equaled to any other 100 points, such as 100 dollars.

Galilean sciences, based on abstract, Euclidean mathematics, describe also communicative events without taking into account the internal parts and organs of the individual species-points with mathematical equations. As such Euclidean sciences have never properly described reality. They here simplified reality into non-vital, games of numbers [points without parts].

Unfortunately Euclidean sciences are used in industrial processes, and their perception of a dead universe justifies multiple forms of preying of man and machines over life, of companies over people. Since Euclidean sciences do not accept the internal organs and perception of species, [the virtual linguistic worlds of “points”], they diminish human perception of the vital Universe. What we need with such an abstract science is a thorough criticism of its limitations. Since it is a poor tool of temporal and organic perception of the vital Universe.

 

Further on it is clear that the preying of humans as points by mathematical sciences implies the extinction of survival instincts in man, and the degradation of the living Universe.

 


10. Errors of digital languages: The simplicity of mathematics

 

All this lead us to critic mathematical science as it is today.

 

Since there is nothing good about the abstraction of mathematics, nothing pure, in a language so simple as Euclidean mathematics, except their lack of capacity to truly explain Reality.

Today the arrival of Einsteinian relativity, the arrival of Dark matter, and the sheer evidence of living species, that perceive other spaces and worlds of communication diminish our respect for mathematical truths.

It is necessary to accept that human knowledge is limited by the nature of our languages of perception, by our eye=Words or human  function of perception, and our mathematical and verbal languages derived of them. We need to understand those limits.

 

Why light-space is not all space there is.

 

What we see when we see a Cartesian, mathematical graph or an image with our eye is light space. Light however does not carry all the information about the space it moves through.

So we make a mathematical map which is smaller than the reality around us.

 

That map has certain holes of information, that makes it a reduced vision of the total Reality. The most obvious holes are those discontinuous species within that mass of light space, called opaque objects. Look around you. What you are seeing is not the entire Reality, but the sea of light, and from time to time, that light finds another discontinuous Reality made of atoms, and you only see the external appearance, and the way that discontinuous Reality interact with the object.

It is what you call an image of Reality.

Yet of all the space between those objects and your eye, you see even less. You see it as a ‘transparency’, and only obtain from it the concept of ‘distance’.

Because of that ‘transparency’ without information you see a ‘continuity’, because if you would see that space discontinuous you would need to see far more information of that space, and you don’t really need it. To survive you need to see only big things, not the small discontinuities of the gravitational Reality. So you don’t see them. as you don’t see the black pieces of a movie-film. Yet they are real, they are there..

Your eye-world is a world of light. Yet because light comes to your eye very fast, it shows you a very long continuity without detail, of extended regions of space. Every time you make a map of Reality in your eye and brain, you are putting together miles of reality scanned by light, and so you make a very long continuous plane, abstract of the real space, as long as the ‘speed of light’ that cover thousand of kilometers every second you make a mental map of reality.

From that eye-plane Descartes brought about his mathematical plane, and defined his abstract points, without pats.

So the light-space you see and the Cartesian graph are synonymous. Yet that light space is not the entire Reality. Each discontinuity within that light space, each object is another little Reality. Even in those spaces between objects that light seems to cover, there are other discontinuities that light does not scan. They are called dark matter, and are also spaces that you do not see. Like you don’t see in a movie the black patches between lights. So light only brings you little information on little pieces of the total space, leaving blank spaces.

If you were using instead of light, to make maps of reality, smells [atomic information] o sounds [mechanical waves] you would see another different map of reality, another kind of space.

Your mathematical eye- space is an abstraction of reality, a map, not reality itself.

There are indeed other ways of scanning Reality besides light. There are smells based in atoms and gravitation based in other forces. Each of those other languages that scan Reality, will give other virtual worlds, maps of Reality.

Thus mathematics, and light-space and Cartesian graphs are particular graphs, of reality.

Euclidean postulates are derived of that light space-time, a ‘¥-linguistic’ perception of the human eye.

 

The eye is the a priori sense of Human space, as words are your language of time. Men are thus perceptors of verbal, mathematical, and ¥-based linguistic statements about reality. Yet beyond man, languages made of a certain form of energy [light, sound waves etc.] can shape different perceptions of reality. What we call ‘virtual worlds’ or ‘minds’ or eye-worlds. The human specific ‘virtual worlds’, are thus limited by our range of sensorial languages that perceive space or time: mainly light, words.

As a result of that specific light-nature of our space-time Reality, we tend to ignore many parallel forces that carry also information beyond ¥-light. Even if man cannot decode them, there are forces able to create maps of Reality constructed perhaps with different logic to that of light worlds. There are sentient minds made with those other maps, from ants’ chemical virtual worlds, to perhaps gravitational images in masses, that man can not access. To hold as absolute, mathematical maps of reality and equations derived of those maps, based only in light-evidence, is plain arrogance.

Descartes confused the entire Reality with his eye-space.

 

The error of Euclid makes the scientific method a relative truth.

 

Yet the scientific method still proclaims Euclidean mathematics, not a mere simple language of perception of light-space, but the ‘reality’, the truth of Reality.

It proclaims that such a relative map of reality, is based in absolute truths, called Postulates of Euclidean mathematics, that cannot be argued.

What to say of that? Arrogance is against knowledge.

 

We have to change the definition of a point and make it have width so we can put several parallels on it.

Mathematicians oddly enough have ‘en masse’ changed the definition of a parallel, to make ‘logic’ the fifth postulate, instead of doing as I did – the most rational thing: to change the definition of a point and let it have several parallels on its internal parts.

Why? The only explanation is that people imitate people. The first guy that in the XIX century corrected Euclidean mathematics changed the concept of a parallel, and the following guys kept that change….

 

In the real Reality it is proved that through a point many parallel lines [of communication] cross. Yet we do not need to change the concept of parallel.

This means simply that points have breath, have internal organic parts. That points are ‘particles’, that seen closely become spheres.

This is logic. In such points the 1 and 5 postulate become proper descriptions of a discontinuous Realities of infinite species, each one a relativistic point or singularity with a relativistic perception of Reality. Without such ‘points with parts’ Reality becomes abstract, a graphic of mathematics.

 

 

Yet the scientific method has not corrected that error of mathematics. So all those scientists and physicists which follow the scientific method, and its E-mathematics, by force only acquire partial truths about space-time reality.

When Descartes considered a representation of the physical Reality, he used a single, continuous space, made from a single frame of reference, in the center of coordinates. That point was the Human eye who creates a ‘continuum’ abstract space-time, according to the human particular perception of Space [Light space, the only space that the eye perceives] and time [clock-time.] The ‘error’ of such simple Reality was to believe in the continuity of space-time in such graph. In reality since all points have parts, all points are relative eye-worlds of gravitational, or light nature. There are ∞ points of measure, ∞ different coordinates. Yet the Cartesian coordinates soon became the ‘Universal coordinates’ of science. So the wrong concept ‘space-time continuum’ still exists.

The real, complex Reality was the one Mr. Desargues and Leonardo proposed with their projective geometry of infinite, relative points of view. The one Eastern religions have thought of. The total, never completely perceived Reality, in which man is only one of the many focus of communication, of the many virtual worlds=species of Space-time.

Reality is much more complex than abstract mathematics. It has a lot of internal worlds that mathematics do not explain.

Indeed, only relativistic mathematics acknowledge this, in the famous 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean mathematics used by Einstein to describe the real Space-time Reality:

– 5] Through a point [line] external to a line [plane], infinite lines [planes] parallel to the point can be traced in Space=Time.

What means that points have parts. Points have internal organs, and so logically they can be knots of infinite worlds of communication.

Mathematics ignore that. So it is illogic, and distorts our perception of reality much more than verbal thought. The first postulate of mathematics says ‘a point has no breath’, but something without breath is not, it does not exist. Yet reality do exist. In mathematics reality is abstract, simplified, non-vital, it does not exist, it has no parts, and so for a mathematician, for a man of the company for whom you are a number, a price, your extinction seems irrelevant.

There are infinite space-time perceptions relative to the complexity of the space-time perceptor. Science merely studies the human eye>world]. That single world is ‘a relative human space’, , a relative ‘complex holograph’ of Reality of communicative forces, a relative virtual world, made of a selection of Times=forms of all what there is out there, that shape a certain space of all the infinite spaces that space-time beings see.

Reality instead is an infinite number of mind-worlds=points of view, one for each ‘sentient’ species of Reality, that creates in each pov-focus, a ‘pictorial perspective’ of the external Reality.

It is now clear why science does not see the vital Reality of multiple species in constant communication through all types of forces. The answer is that science expresses his truths only through clocks, and mathematical numbers. Yet mathematics are a language limited to  show only the abstract surface of things.

 

The Simplicity Of Mathematics

 

The loss of the internal parts of species, of their vital nature, caused by the Euclidean simplification of species as points without volume has created some errors that limit our knowledge of the biological, vital Reality:

 

•       First abstract mathematics deny communication as the basis of Universal events. In reality what points-species do is to communicate forces which carry information and/or energy. Yet in mathematics, points are void and do not share -communicate- anything. So forces of communication and all particles studied with mathematics, also become abstract, mindless energy. Reality becomes in this manner dead, mute, “scientific.”

 

•       As a result of that death of communication, the creation of many species of Reality is not understood in vital terms, as a process of transfer of information and energy, but as a mechanical process.

 

•       The denial of communication among species denies social evolution and promotes chaotic, destructive theories of reality . In a non-Euclidean vital Reality of points with parts, species have internal organs of information and energy, able to perceive each other with communication forces. They organize themselves in social networks through social, communicative evolution. Atoms share electrons to become molecules. Molecules share atoms to become macromolecules. Macromolecules share mino-molecules and organize cells. Cells share blood-energy and nervous information to become bodies. Humans share verbal information to become ‘History’.  In reality [not in Euclidean mathematics] from microcosms, to macrocosms, communicative species, with will to act, in the limited Reality they perceive, organize themselves into complex systems. Yet in Euclidean Sciences, despite growing evidence that shows “all herds” interacting with each other, this vital Reality becomes dead and chaotic.

 

•       Another consequence of a single space-time is a constant deformation of the multiple causes of Reality, which is modular. Since each point participates of the processes involved in creation. Yet in the E-Reality that is perceived from that single human point of view, all other causes are simplified.

Nothing then works. Reality seems chaotic because we are trying to create artificial order from the single human p.o.v., from a single abstract graph.

 

A lot of consequences and causes are not perceived. We think often that a single cause [ceteris paribus cause] is the only reason reality exists.

The error of ceteris paribus causes is very extended in all sciences, because the scientist goes with his abstract conceptualization, of a continuum single frame of reference, and feels satisfied wit a single cause. In reality, in a vital Reality of networks of communication and infinite vital points, there are constantly infinite little causes to every consequence. So our E-equations that do not account for all the vital points of view that have dynamic influences over each relative event, fail to understand such phenomena. Chaos merely means that we do not know all the influences from where it comes the order. That we have a ‘chaotic’, single perspective.

 

•       The non-existence of vital parts, the informative and energy organs of species, becomes an error of moral order. This error is fundamental to explain the extinctive capacity of science. “Minds” are converted by mathematics into abstract points without linguistic perception. Reality then becomes physical, “material.” Languages, minds  and forces of communication are ignored.   Where only the Cartesian Human Eye and space is accepted as real, and perceptive.

 

•       Life is defined by Cartesian science in terms of movement and energy; instead of perception and intelligence, as old philosophers used to define it. Life became energy, instead of information. Reality lost its rational, tempo-logical nature, and became spatial energy. Space, force, no longer time, perception, mattered. Energy no longer logic-intelligence, became the right thing to be because still, inner virtual worlds had disappeared from the graph of Cartesian scientists. Yet as a king, a stock trader, a CEO, a black hole, a DNA, a Computer CPU, and a Sun well know, to be fixed, and yet attract to you forms of energy, that desire your command of a language=force of communication, is the best position of power. The true nature of existence. Perceptive, causal stillness was the meaning of the Aristotelian concept of multiple unmoved Gods, ‘focusing’ Reality. Yet with Descartes a dead Reality of points with no parts appeared. So science started to describe mechanically, in abstract ways, forms who had a ‘how’ based in communicative forces and linguistic perception, besides their ‘mechanic movements’, ruled by mathematics with no parts, now ignored.

Abstract science had set the pre-conditions to perceive Reality as a dead Reality, with man as the only intelligent eyes. This no longer holds today in relativistic science.

It is self-evident that mathematics as it is understood today, in terms of abstract numbers which represent herds of real beings, of vital Non-E Points, equalized in mathematical descriptions, are a very poor way of knowledge, in as much as it empties us of virtual worlds, it simplifies us and itifies reality. Specially when applied to humans [statistics, economics], that control man through prices, and equal men and machines or allow to handle men, as objects, is a lethal weapon, that makes of man just another abstract point-number. In fact the most modern technological, mathematical nations such as pre-war Germany, today America, show a lack of concern for human non-abstract rights, which are appalling compared to old verbal societies, that had not forgotten the importance of the inner parts and words of human beings. It is necessary to know and explain the limits of mathematics, specially in the study of economical and social sciences, their indifference to the rights of life-Nature – our vital space – to the rights of non-technological human beings. Or else we will eliminate man who is from an abstract point of view, less efficient than the machines with whom economists compare us through abstract prices and productivity-costs.

It is urgent to explain the constant cheating that mathematics cause to humanity, since it does not care for us, it treats us as beings whose volumes, internal worlds, feelings and hopes of survival are ignored.

 

Despite its errors, science ignores other languages. The Galilean px.

 

Further on science only cares about mathematics. So it cannot improve his understanding of Reality with other languages such as words. Science does not give the same value to verbal truths than to mathematical truths. That error limits the capacity of Science to help mankind in his ultimate goal: to know.

The error of the abstraction of scientific statements, has to be found in the limits of mathematical languages to describe properly the vital Reality.

We can specifically explain the error when we analyze what is a language:

 

“A language is a relative perception of Reality, biased to favor the perspective of the species that talks the language”.

Such biological definition of a language is in tune with our present knowledge of linguistics: species talk languages to inform themselves about Reality, and use that information to survive. So languages tend to make their speakers the center of Reality.

We call that property, the “Galilean, or Cartesian paradox’. Since our light perception makes the Earth a still center of Reality [Galilean paradox], and the mathematical version of that perception makes the Cartesian graph the only graph of reality.

The Cartesian graph, is a particular linguistic case of the selfishness of all point of view of Reality.

 

We call it the ‘Galilean paradox’:

“all forms of Reality perceive=measure Reality from a limited numbers of languages, and confuse reality with their perception.”

We confuse reality with the languages we measure reality.

Two examples: we say a truth is a linguistic sentence. We say: you are tall is a truth. You are tall is just a sentence that simplifies a truth: you, a tall person. You are the truth. The sentence is only a mirror, a simplification of the truth. So happens with a mathematical statement.

 

In reality the content of truth of a certain linguistic statement about a certain being of Reality increases as more languages=mirrors are applied to that being. Relativity is synonymous of true knowledge: in reality we observe Reality from multiple logic languages. Yet the total truth belongs only to the being in all its cycles of energy and information, that an external observer never will be able to scan totally without modifying them [Uncertainty principle].

Reality has the truth about Reality.

All other truths will be simplified, and centered from a certain point of perception, that deforms from that point, reality. We call that constant deformation of perception caused by the need for languages and frames of reference the Galilean paradox. Since the main case is the Earth’s deformation of his movement. The Earth seems still, because from the Earth it operates the Galilean paradox. The Earth fixes reality and measures it with light and gravitation, creating a false image of reality. Reality has the Earth as the center of Reality only in your senses. Your perception cheats you. Makes you superior, makes you the center of Reality. It also downplays the living nature of Reality, and upgrades the capacity of your languages, of your mind. It indeed makes you the center of Reality.

 

The Galilean Px will be applied latter to show how errors of selfish arrogance construct human history. Since humans deny perception to all other sentient forms of nature in order to use them as energy of man, even when that denial distorts truth.

 

Brains and languages map distorted visions of reality. We call those distorted visions of reality “worlds’, or “Eye-worlds”. Eye-worlds are virtual truths, relative linguistic truths over the total Universal truth, which cannot be communicated in its totality. Since only Reality holds all the information about its self. Truths are relative statements, conditioned by the language in which they are expressed. In that view scientific truths, become relative truths conditioned both by the ¥-language of man [1-10% of reality=non dark matter] that we use to gather information; and by the A-E logic languages of human reason. Our languages of perception therefore are our limits of truth: One of those limited human languages, light, decoder of spatial perception, is rather Universal, and shared by many species of Times. The other linguistic communicator – verbal thought, decoder of temporal perception – is an internal, bio-logical species, proper only of man.

All those languages have followed since A-E Science was ‘invented’, in his path of historical evolution, an increasing degree of complexity, which has enriched Reality of man. As man evolved, those languages evolved even faster, directing in this manner modern history through certain arrows of linguistic evolution: the arrow of ¥-light and image evolution, the arrow of verbal and religious evolution, and the arrow of machine and digital evolution.

Yet Aristotelian and Euclidean postulates on verbal and mathematical thought are not, [contrary to ‘imprinted belief’], absolute truths. They are partial truths that allow man to reflect in words and equations [mathematical languages], certain Universal forms=reality, of the total Reality. We do not perceive reality, when we talk or make equations on that reality – not even when we see – but a simplification-image of reality. Yet the approximation given by verbal-Aristotelian, and Mathematical-Euclidean thought, is rather accurate, and satisfies our need for a human representation of Reality. We accept those linguistic approximations as good enough, with certain reservations. Since the rules of Aristotelian logic and Euclidean Mathematics are not proved. Those initial postulates of Euclidean mathematics and Aristotelian logic are probably simplifications of the rules by which Reality organizes all type of eye>worlds. So this book is very much concerned with those initial postulates, or mainframe of human languages: the five postulates of Euclidean Geometry, and the rules of causality of Aristotelian Logic, in which humanity has based his scientific perception of reality.

The Euclidean Geometry defines the mathematical space in which our eye communicates.

The Logic of Aristotle defines the verbal temporal and spatial perception of the words of man.

Could other eye-words exist based in other Mathematical statements or logic statements?

How such eye-worlds would be?

The answer to the first question is yes. Einstein analyzed the gravitational Reality and found that it did not follow the geometry of light, it had a different form, and we suppose that gravitational perceptors [masses and stars who knot gravitation as we knot light in the eye] would have different eye-worlds. They probably perceive dark matter, since it is gravitational matter. So they probably have more volume of perception which is a logic assumption since they are bigger species than man is.

On the other hand we have already dealt with the discontinuity of time, that causes causality from past to future and future to past [energy and information causality]. So unicausality as Aristotle and ceteris paribus analysis establish is false. We have also considered all statements, linguistic truths, probable truths on the total event=existence they describe. So Aristotelian truth, absolute truth is always a probability of the total existence of the event.

Science of course cannot study beyond his instruments which measure basically light -as our eyes do, but with more precision, with metal-eye precision… So science is a probability of truth, despite its arrogant use of such terms. Scientific causes are partial causes of the total causes of an event.

 

Abstract, Euclidean mathematics of species without parts.

 

Once we have argued the relative truth of languages, it should be clear that mathematics are merely the spatial perception of the Human eye, in a single language, that of light, through the 3 dimensions of light, width-magnetic field, height-electric field, and length-speed. Since our temporal perception does not vary, it can be taken as a constant of the Human Reality.  Only when mathematics become physics and studies species with different speeds of  time – of perception and action-reaction – it is needed to add a fourth dimension of temporal coordinates to mathematics.

Then mathematics become physics, and human relativistic clock-time equalizes all those other speeds in abstract terms. We talk of two degrees of abstraction, that reduce the total information about the living Reality: physics of 4 dimensional mathematics, with a human single times that simplifies all other times.  Euclidean geometry of 3 dimensions that simplifies in one more dimension the living Reality.

So Euclidean geometry is merely the virtual world of light, void of temporal discontinuity, with the human temporal eye-world as the constant of time perception.

We explained the Cartesian graph of mathematics, and its error of continuity We can add a second reason why mathematics lack a temporal dimension: the enormous speed of light gives light minimal temporal depth in our environment [the Earth’s crust], and max. spatial distance. The light eye perceives reality in spatial terms, and its  geometry [mathematics] become the spatial scanner of man.

Man improves that defect of eye-mathematics with verbal thought which has much more temporal depth and acts as the time scanner of man.

In all what concerns survival and existence -a temporal function- verbal thought is much more intelligent than mathematics. For that reason in a healthy organism of history verbal thought should control mathematical truths, since the survival and existence of man, is more important than our spatial images.

This is a fact that scientists and economists forget: survival is temporal and has to be argued in verbal terms. Mathematics are spatial and should be used only for spatial matters. We should not take decisions on the survival and extinction of human species in mathematical terms, [as we do in abstract economics that promotes the mathematical abstraction, man=price=product, where man is equalized to machines in fields of labor and consume, thanks to the abstract concept of a price-monetary value].

 

What we call science is still today basically abstract mathematics, based not in the organic logic of Reality, but in their spatial description with abstract Cartesian graphs, and light metal senses.

We will use with such abstract science a healthy criticism of his many limits, given its poor tools of perception of Reality. Unfortunately Euclidean mathematics are used for scientists, who apply science to industrial and war processes. We will criticize from abstract science, such perception of a dead Reality, that justifies his evolution of machines and weapons that prey over life, and make of mathematics the language of extinction of life species, and human beings, under rhetoric of truth and knowledge. Those who use mathematics to extinct life should know that extinct beings do not know anything…

11. Superiority of verbal sciences: Theory of Evolution and the bio-logical method

 

Darwin and Plank. New verbal and mathematical, relative ideas.

 

Indeed, far superior to the abstraction of Euclidean science, there is a bio-logic theory that truly explains why species survive and become extinct: Theory of Evolution now applied to the evolution of languages. When Darwin came with a verbal theory of reality that was also relativistic, as Eastern philosophy, and logic based in facts, as experimental science, he gave a chance to man to survive by understanding the laws of the Universe…. He said men were not the center of the Universe, but a stage in the evolution of species of space-time, coming from simpler species such as the ape. Then in the XX C. Physicists who were exploring the Universe with mathematical languages and sensorial machines that worked as human eyes [telescopes, cameras] and human brains [chips, clocks], realized their instruments and languages were not absolute. They merely perceived a part of reality, and then transformed that perception into a simplified version, of reality called ‘Euclidean mathematics’.

Quantic theory proved we could not observe accurately the Universe [Heisenberg Principle of Uncertainty]. Einstein proved the wider Universe had a non-Euclidean visual structure. There was there a substance called dark matter that we could not see….

Darwin, Plank, Einstein, and our instruments that do not perceive dark matter, and the dimensions of gravitational Non-Euclidean space, have proved that we live in a Universe, far more relativistic, mysterious, and alien to the human intelligence, that western thought believed.

We talk then of two clear ages in mathematical knowledge parallel to the two ages of verbal knowledge: the age of Newtonian-galilean absolutist, anthropomorphic science, parallel to the age of anthropomorphic religions; and the age of Einsteinian-relativistic science, parallel to the Eastern verbal age of relativistic thought.

Languages are not truth, but mirrors of the Universe. The Universe is not written only in mathematics as Galilee thought. Mathematics is only one of the languages that perceives the Universe [Karl Popper]. Computers confirm that, since they have developed with mathematics a visual vision of the Universe, that we might call ‘digital intelligence’, that is able to perform task of comprehension that humans perform with verbal languages, using mathematical algorithms. What is truth, the smell of the dog, the words of man, the numbers of computers? They are all relativistic, linguistic knowledge.

 

Those facts are still argued by many scientists, which do not want to leave their privileged position based in mathematics, as the priests of Vatican did not want to leave their privileged position based in verbal thought.

But proves are overwhelming. Dark matter that is not in our space, perceived with light-eyes, is maybe 99% of reality.

On the other hand, at the beginning of the XX C., Fitzgerald, Lorentz and Einstein discovered that clocks are not the only way to measure time. That in certain regions of the Universe clocks go faster or slower, there are other times. Biologists discovered the circadian cycles o beings, that also measure time with other rhythms. So neither scientific instruments not mathematics understand all the time and space of the Universe.

We have reached now with mathematics, at the same level of knowledge that Taoists and Buddhists reached with words. An age of relativism of knowledge, relative to our instruments and languages of perception.

 

A historic anecdote can contrast both levels of ‘perceptive knowledge’.

In the XVIII century, the English arrived to China and tried to sell the Chinese their clocks to measure time. Taoists priests told them they were not interested in ‘their ugly, simple, mechanical times’. That they ‘preferred to see the living times of the Universe’. The English did not understand anything. Why the Chinese were talking about many times? According to them time was singular, abstract, the clock-time.  Yet the English, instead of learning about living times, angry because they sold so little gadgets, came back with canons and opium, [a lethal, but appealing product to the Chinese mind, since it opened doors to the perception of those other times and spaces]; and they destroyed the Chinese civilization…

Had they learned about the ‘living cycles of time’, western science and western culture, could have improved for the better.

 

Since, unlike in Eastern thought, the age of  scientific relativism had not arrived to Europe. Today mathematical relativism is very young, and it needs to be developed further, as we will try to do in this book.

 

 

The need to advance relativistic, mathematical science.

 

Einstein’s seemed close to do it. He started calling his theory, ‘Theory of Relativity’. But as we shall see latter, Einstein did not go far enough. He broke with certain conventions of absolutist mathematics-physics, but he still kept the Cartesian plane of a single space-time continuum based in the 3 dimensions of light perception [height, length and width, equivalent to the 3 directions of the magnetic, electric and speed directions of light].

So he accepted subconsciously the light-plane as the plane of space.

That is the origin of so many contradiction in the world of physics today. Einstein and many physicists that followed him said that the gravitational Universe has a Non-Euclidean structure, and yet it uses the Euclidean plane.

 

But if space was more complex and wider than Dogmatic mathematics believed, so happened with Time.

Einstein found that there are many speeds of clocks, many time-speeds, and yet scientists still think that the particular clock speed on Earth is absolute time…

So it is necessary to correct those errors, to be brave enough to break with mathematical conventions, in order to understand with eastern science, the Universe, as Eastern verbal philosophers did.

To that aim is useful to put together verbal philosophies of eastern thought, and western mathematical knowledge, in what some scientists start to call the ‘third age of science’.

The bridge to put together those two theories of the Universe is curiously Theory of Evolution, a theory about the existence and extinction of reality that uses both, verbal and mathematical statements…

Let us see how this might happen.

 

The third age of science.

 

The third age of science arrives when we combine the two approaches of knowledge verbal knowledge and mathematical knowledge through Theory of Evolution. We no longer try to search for absolute knowledge, of all the details of reality, but a Theory or model of reality that explains why species of space-time, minds that perceive space and time with different languages and forces [such as words, mathematics, light, smell or gravitation], exist. And how their existence is selected. Since the Universe is made of such species, and regions that contain either spatial energy or temporal information, if we understand the processes of creation and destruction of those minds and regions of space-time, we will understand the rules of existence of the Universe.

Once this becomes obvious, it is easy to see how the selection process of minds that perceive space and time works.

There exist many minds and ways to perceive the Universe. Each being, each mind has a model-map-mirror-image-virtual world of the Universe. How all those mind-brains and the surfaces of ‘vital space’, the ‘bodies of energy’, they inform become ordered?

Through the selection of species. Selection of species not only applies to the stronger bodies, but also to the languages and minds which are more intelligent, which gather more information about the Universe. Those species such as man in the Earth, maybe black holes in the ‘Total Universe’ of multiple gravitational space-times, process much more information than other species around them. They are ‘linguistic top predators’, and so they control their ecosystems, [the Earth’s crust in the human case, the galaxy in the case of black holes], shaping them to their image and resemblance.

Galaxies turn around black holes. The Earth is molded by human actions.

So those species of minds that perceive better space and time, survive in the Universe, act-react faster, and hunt or enslave simpler species.

The order of the Universe of multiple space-times is therefore a biological order. The future belongs to those species that better understand space and time. Those species will reproduce in the future, causing ‘physically’ the appearance of the future, and extinguishing or ordering the other species.

Those processes might be conscious or unconscious, vital or mechanical, but they are real. So ‘mechanical black holes’ attract and destroy all other gravitational beings. The sun orders gravitational beings of lesser gravitational information [mass] such as planets, and comets…

In the ‘ecosystem’ of gravitational information, to have more gravity, more mass is the sure path to survival.

In the ‘ecosystem’ of light-information, to have better eyes, and better visual languages is the sure path to survival.

 

God, the logic of change, in that sense is a biological logic, or a being whose existence and impersonal laws are evolutionary laws, that provoke the extinction and existence of reality.

 

What is the position of man in that ladder of minds that perceive the Universe? Obviously we are the top predator mind on the Earth. But there are two reasons why we should reflect about the fragility of that position.

We do not perceive gravitation, which is the force that ‘perceives 90-99% of reality’. So we are not such a great mind. We are a light mind, and our knowledge is basically light-based.

Imagine you are a cockroach. Cockroaches are the top predator chemical systems of information on Earth. They could feel very arrogant, since in their language-universe they are top predators, and they do not understand any other language. At most they have a ‘hint’ that there exists a wider language of information that scans much more universe, called Light.

But they cannot grasp or dominate that information very well, so basically when they see species of that other bigger Universe, they become frightened and run away, into the comfort of their well known dark Universe, ‘enlightened’ by chemical smells.

From the perspective of our bigger light Universe, to have a ‘chemical mind’ such as the one of cockroaches should not be a reason of ‘great arrogance’.

Yet man who has a ‘cockroach mind’, compared to a possible mind that could perceive the entire gravitational Universe [maybe the black hole], feels however an enormous arrogance.

This is truly dangerous. Imagine the cockroach that felt so arrogant as to think she can wonder freely in the land of light-space. Soon she will find a true top predator that will crash it ‘like a cockroach’. Curiosity kills the cat.

In the case of man, this might happen soon.

Indeed, we are developing a new kind of mind, of virtual world of light who seem to have the potential of becoming superior to man in a very short period. ‘Digital minds’, computers, nets and robots, are evolving very fast, and by many standards they have become superior to man in their capacity to handle visual languages, specially mathematics… Will they substitute man as the top predator light-mind on Earth?

Arrogance is indeed the capital sin, the sin against survival.

 

Moral rules in a Complex Universe.

 

Human knowledge advances towards the third age of science: there is not a single reality, but knowledge is relative, depends on our sensorial and linguistic perception of space and time, and builds a ‘virtual world’, an image of the real, total Universe.

Those virtual worlds however are fundamental, since there is a constant selection of the best virtual worlds of the Universe. The Universe is evolving, it is growing in space and time [space expands, and time lasts longer], and it is growing in the way its species process spatial energy and temporal information with their brains and bodies.

The change we see in the Universe are changes related to the extinction and reproduction of such brain-body systems, and the way they affect the spatial reality and temporal forms of the Universe.

Immediately we can apply those concepts to study the evolution of celestial bodies, based in gravitational and electromagnetic processes of energy and information… Astro-biology is born. We can also study the evolution of perception on Earth, a planet that receives its energy and information from light. Indeed, species on Earth are selected by its capacity to understand light-energy ,and light information. So first plants who understood light-energy dominated. Then animals who were able to process through eyes, light into information became dominant. Finally men who added a ‘temporal language’ to their eye perception, the language of words, controlled the Earth. But men are now developing digital languages, mathematics, in machines, that are taking over the Ecosystem of the Earth, and displacing the animal ecosystem [nature] and the human ecosystem [history].

This final age of the Machine is clearly dangerous to the survival of man, because we stop being the top predator brain-body system, as we evolve robotics and other machines of science, with better perceptive senses and brains [camera-eyes, chip-brains].

The cycle is completed: our conclusions in the third age of science, are similar to those of the Verbal masters of relativistic Eastern thought. Man should understand the laws of change in the universe, the existence of other parallel brains, who perceive other regions of space and time, that man ignore. Then we should draw obvious laws of human behavior, according to those universal laws, and promote our role as top predator brains on Earth. We should not act with arrogance, and destroy nature – our biologic ecosystem – and pretend to be God, building machines more intelligent than us. Instead, we should respect the laws of evolution, use them to the advantage of man, and develop a harmonic vision of the universe, with both verbal and mathematical languages.

It is the old vision of Chinese Taoists. Lao-tse said: “when more complex instruments men discover, more wars and destruction happens”.

The ‘third age of science’ implies the knowledge of the living Universe, and the need to be cautious in that Universe, and use the bio-logic rules of existence to the advantage of man.

 

The third age of science, fight between languages.

 

We had a first age of science, when verbal philosophers studied the Universe with human senses, eyes and words. Its summit was in Asia, with Buddha and Lao-tse, which understood quite well the Universe with words. Then we had the second age of science, which studied the Universe with machines, telescopes, cameras, computers, and numbers. Basically we have got to the same conclusions.

That knowledge is relative and different depending on the senses and languages we use. If you see it, or you smell it, or you touch it, or you put it on numbers, you will have a different visions of the Universe.

The scientific method merely looks at it, with metal-senses, clocks, telescopes, computers, cameras, and numbers. So the third science is the science of all languages. It does not think like religions that words are truth, or like science that mathematics are truths, but it studies, why there are languages, and senses with relative truths that build up different images of the Universe. If you look at the flowers on the garden, you see a red flower. A bee sees a yellow flower. An ant smells the flower. So does a dog. The Earth feels its weight. A blind man caress her. For all of them it is a flower, but the image they have is different. What is then the flower? A smell, an image, a weight, a color? It all depends on the mind that perceives it. Each language, each mind sees a different form of space and rhythm of time. So no one has the truth about that flower. Only the flower has all the real information about the flower. The scientist looks at her with his metal-minds, you with your human mind, the dog, with an smelling mind. An artist with a stylish mind? Which one is better? The Universe that science shows us is only an image of the Universe, the mirror that machines have on it. So because science is not truth, the correct answer to knowledge is to choose and prefer human knowledge, since in a subjective Universe, the only truth that matters is the survival and evolution of our mind and senses. This is the traditional answer of art and verbal religions to science.  Scientific knowledge has always to be submissive to ethic and aesthetic knowledge, to art, and development of human senses. Since an extinct species knows nothing, ethics and the conservation of nature are values superior to digital information. An answer validated by the laws of evolution, and the laws of social organisms, when we apply them to history and its  language. The purpose of the next chapters is to prove that such a fight between languages structures history. Artists have been right in siding with human language throughout history.

 

 


12. Survival of man requires a change in our top predator languages.

 

The Two Ages of History: Verbal History and Digital Economics.

 

We conclude that the fundamental divide of human history is between the age of Words, when verbal thought was the dominant language of information in history, (-150.000, 1602) and the age of digital thought, when money and science, two languages of digital nature, replaced verbal thought as the languages that direct and create reality – now a reality of machines. Now, machines are top predators promoted by the scientific method of clock-measuring of time and telescope-perception, by companies that reproduce machines and lobbies that control political power. Those structures replace the verbal, religious vision of man as the center of the universe.

 

The digital age of history is also the age of extinction of human history, since the eco[nomic]system now belongs to a new species: metalife. The age of verbal truths and human truths no longer exists. In 1602, stock companies with paper money started the evolution of machines. They conquered the Dutch Government, the English Government, Europe and America. The world became a bio-economy whose aim now is to reproduce machines, to work on them and to consume them for money. This means the end of bio-history, of Wor[l]ds [worlds made with words to the image and resemblance of man] of human beings as top predators and creators of the future.

We will study in the next chapters, those two ages of History, but before we do so, let us consider what the ‘ideal age of history’, one in which man is top predator and follows his natural will might had been – if digital worlds and animetals were not.

 

PART 2: 

VISUAL ART AND WORDS: 

THE LANGUAGES OF MANKIND

 

 

 

CHAPTER 4: THE HUMAN ORGANISM.

 

1: What is a human organism.

 

Let us then study the Human organism, both at individual level and at collective level. Since through words men did learn also how to evolve socially beyond the level of individuals into macro-social organisms, the organisms of history, cultures and civilizations.

 

A human organism is the basic unit-cell of the social organisms of history. He is in itself an organism, that follows the laws of all social organisms.

Thus we are also composed, of cellular beings, join by networks of energy and information. Those networks are called the blood and nervous system. Finally we have a third reproductive network as all living organisms, called the endocrine network.

We are thus organisms of energy and information, in nothing different from all other organisms of the Universe, subject to the same laws of morphology and behavior.

Those laws explained in other pages of this web, are self-evident in the human organism.

Our centers of information, the head, the brain and the eye, follow the formal laws of informative species: they are small, circular, cyclical, and they control the energy systems of our organism.

Those energy systems also follow the morphological laws of energy-bodies. They are lineal, or planar in shape, bigger and stronger than the information center that rules them. So your members are lines, and your body is a plane.

Regarding the behavior of organisms, our organism follows the basic laws of Universal Organisms:

– We evolve socially sharing information and energy with other beings of the same species. Thus we are naturally inclined to love other human beings, and we need to be brain-washed by ideologies to avoid that natural religion.

– On the other hand we compete with species different to us, which means in bio-history that we compete with machines.

– Finally regarding our behavior, we are also naturally inclined to follow the universal behavior of organisms, and search for information to feed our head, energy to feed our body and whenever we can we try to reproduce both, a body of energy and a brain of information in other part of the Universe. Those 3 natural drives of existence, are the essence of human behavior that bring us happiness. So we always act searching for those natural drives. When we love we are acting under the drive of reproduction. When we read, or watch a metal-communicator, is the drive of information that guide us. When we feed, or accumulate vital property, or decorate our home, we are creating a vital space, and acquiring energy to survive.

From all those biological facts, we can build a theory of bio-history  and art, based in the fundamental biological laws of behavior and morphology of Universal organisms.
2. The body and the brain of man.

 

The proper human being is a Universal organism, based in a dual system of energy and information, or body-head, which provides the carbolife energy and linguistic information needed to the human being. The main consequences of that organization of man as a Universal organism are both external and internal.

In next graph we have drawn a human being as an organic being, based in a dual system of energy/information, or body-head, with centers of max. control of energy/information in the heart-eye.  You are two different systems: the informative system is the head which has two limbs, the arms, to manipulate externally information. On the other hand your body with center in the heart, has its legs, that move you as manipulators of external energy. You could in fact imagine the two parts of man as separated systems: the eye-head and its manipulative lines, the arms which follow the spatial orders of the head. And the heart-body, and the two energy lines of the legs shape the body-energy system. So we are again in a basic dual Universal system, of energy and information with two external organs that permit the cycles of mental information to act up in the external world, manufacturing things with the hands, and the cycles of body-energy to manifest themselves externally moving with an alternating lineal movement the body. In that sense again the kind of movements the members of humans develop correspond to the standard Universal movements of complex energy and information. The arms, are the creative organs that translate the cycles of the mind into creative actions. The legs release the body energy into movement:

 

 

A temporal mind species

 

In the graph we can observe the human organism, as a Universal dual Ti(m)es, with 3 basic systems from top to bottom: the informative-head system, or head, the body system with center in the heart, and the reproductive system with center in the sexual organs.

If we consider the brain it has a dual perceptive system of spatial information, (the eyes) and a dual perceptive system of temporal information (the ears that hear voices and sounds, which give us temporal information about the survival and nature of organisms, and the mouth that talks). It is important to notice though that unlike future machines, we can only create temporal thoughts, with words, but we cannot create spatial images with our eyes. So we are a species dominant in temporal information, since we have both arrows of absorption and creation of information in our temporal verbal languages, (we can hear and talk), and only one arrow in our spatial, visual language (absorption of information).

Then it comes the body system which is commanded by the heart, that provides the needed movement to the energy networks (blood systems). The body has two centers of absorption of energy: the stomach that processes the basic bricks of creation of elements and molecules needed by the organism, and a second body energy system in the lungs-mouth. We observe here the existence of two systems of energy provision. Why? Obviously because the lungs provide fast energy, required for movement and thought, (direct, pure oxygen), and the stomach provides long term energy in the form of material bricks to compose other elements of the body. Accordingly lungs absorb fast moving oxygen, and the stomach liquids and solid forms. In this manner the 3 states of matter are processed by the human being.

Finally we can consider the reproductive system, which is different according to the universal specialization of sophisticated species, which are either specialized in energy (lineal male, lineal penis, lineal spermatozoid)  or in information (cyclical female, cyclical clitoris, cyclical ovules). It is then obvious that our sexual differentiation also responds to the dual nature of the Universe.

.

The function of existence of the human being.

 

So we can define very easily a man as:

Energy-body>Informative-Head.

 

The total human being is a complex being, based in a dual system, or body-head, which provides the energy and information for the total human being.

We said that the eye-head-arms are the function of informative existence of the Mind of man [the total informative organs of man]. For the same reason, the body-legs are the function of energetic existence of the total human being.

As an informative specialized mammal, what really matters in man is the head-mind. It is the mind which controls and creates weapons, money and words, the systems of organization of History, not the body. So we do not need to know much about the body, except the fact that it is our energy system, submissive to our informative mental senses.

 

The networks organs of cellular existence – Internal senses.

 

To tie up both systems the human being has established also 3 internal networks, which again respond to an information organ or nervous system, an energy digestive system, and a reproductive system, or endocrine-blood system.

Blood systems are the energy networks of the body and, nerves are the information networks of the mind. Accordingly the energy-blood system and nervous-electronic system have its centers of max. perception  in the heart and eye-brain, the centers of the body and head.

In human beings, the system of informative perception, and the system of reproductive perception [eye-brain and heart-body], are tied together around nervous and blood networks. Those two networks shape again a new level of complexity in the cellular being, communicating cells with the knots of the body and brain. Those networks and its knots – the eye-brain, and the heart – make you an entity called man.

In fact,  cells exist as independent units but are controlled by the nervous and blood and endocrine systems which are what you perceive more intensely as your self – pain, pleasure, love, hate, all those sensations are focused in the blood and nervous systems. So the will and human body perception is in the heart, and the will and mind perception is in the brain.

 

Dominance of the mind

 

In as much as the higher organ of in[form]ative and energetic transfer, is the conscious zone of the being, the soul of the entity; our consciousness of being is in fact in your |blood, and chemical-endocrine feelings, and in your nervous-eye sensations, both expressed socially with verbal thought; and feelings.

Yet of all those networks the dominant element that reacts faster to external aggression, is the nervous system, only submissive to the eye who perceives the space-time coordinates of man.

Why the mind controls the body? Because the nervous system is the fastest informative system, So it acts-reacts so much faster than individual cells and blood-endocrine systems. So it can control them.

The eye-brain ‘feeds’ in light  images at 300.000 km/s of relative, speed of information. So he controls the Heart-Body system,  which absorbs chemical information, around ± 1 million times slower. On that view the networks have an order of power, since the eye has the max. speed of perception and informative complexity.

Yet the most intelligent brains understand they have to take care of the body without which they would not survive.

 

We talk of a preying pyramid within the human being between its different systems, organs and senses. Yet to balance that dominance, in all body-brain beings we can observe elements of balance and communication between the cyclical informative entity and the body-energy entity – the networks.

In man it is the endocrine, feeling system with site in the lower brain, the thalamus. Hence the importance of emotional intelligence, in the survival and balance of our organism.

Body and brain have to be harmonic to make a species survive. An important fact when we study cultures that prevail in information as our western culture, and tend to collapse in massive deaths and wars… Only a culture harmonic in body and brain sensations is fit to survive in the vital, balanced Universe.

 

Feelings.

 

To that aim we sense also through endocrine systems with a central organ in the centered base of the brain – probably the thalamus – the communicator zone between body and brain, harmonic sensations called feelings.

Feelings as communicators of body-mind sensations are the balanced function of human existence. Hence by definition survival and reproductive functions of the body-mind system are expressed by the word, which expresses feelings.

 

Languages.

 

So two fundamental systems control your existence, the feelings of the endocrine system, or reproductive system, and the thoughts of your eye-brain. We can talk also of the primary desires of your body-blood systems, but those are the energy-desires of lesser importance.

Man has organized those 2 information-body levels of perception, that respond again to the universal brain-body dominance in all organisms, by elaborating two basic languages that translate those information.

Images which are the pure language of the eye-brain.

And words which are the pure language of feelings and emotions.

Even though we can feel through images and express visual images with words, it is clear that the eye is limited in its range of perception of emotions, and the word is the best language for such feeling-perception.

In that sense your languages of perception, visual images and words, respond to those dominant brain-body systems.

While the lower senses and desires respond to your need for energy, or blood desires.

You perceive the cycles of existence of your reproductive desires also through the connective, ‘existential’ language of man: the Word.

As such words are the most balanced and ‘wise’ of human languages. Yet because its complexity, or degree of carrying information, is lesser than that of the eye, feelings and words are downplayed in our culture based in information. This is obviously wrong, and biases our existence towards an excess of information.

Unfortunately we can use images (that are worth the information of one thousand words) to manipulated with “I”=eye evidence, the verbal evidence of words. So in more cultures and individuals the eye evidence guides the brain.

Under orders of the brain, external eye stimuli release then chemical particles that the heart-blood-body system can understand and obey [of which adrenaline is the best known].

 


3. Senses and organs.

 

Another fundamental element of the human being are the senses, which can be considered the energetic, informative and reproductive holes of the body and head to the external universe. Through those senses the body and the head acquire energy, information and reproduce themselves.

 

The outlets of Information and Energy organs of man: senses.

 

So let’s look at the two ‘parts’ of man, each one with his reproductive, evolutionary and devolutionary systems – what we call the Human senses:

 

The senses: 3-external outlets of the energy body and informative brain:

 In the graph we can see clearly how the ‘6 senses of man’ are related to two complete body-brains systems of existence. So we talk of the 3 spatial-body senses, and the 3 eye-mental senses.

The reproductive the body-brain systems of man and their 3 dimensional organs-senses create the virtual world of human reality in its connection with the external universe. They make-create external human time-existence. In the graph we can see clearly how the 5 external senses +1 internal sense [feelings]  complete the 3 Vital Ti(m)es of existence, of the body and head. Indeed, what we call the senses would be:

 

– Taste, the energy=devolutionary organ of the body.

– Sex, the reproductive system of the body – mainly a touch sense.

– Smell, the, informative-evolutionary organ of the body, that informs in most animals about the nature of the hidden species that surround us. In man it has a low development.

 

– Sight, which is the spatial, energy sense of the brain.

– Words (ears-voice) which are the mental reproductive systems of the brain, that process temporal information.

– Feelings: which control the reproductive and survival sensations of the mind. It is however an internal feeling that connects both body and brain systems.

 

So the ‘simple’-‘lower’ senses of the body are the main chemical perceptors of man; the transformers of external, chemical forms into feeding perceptions. While the mind feeds on visual eye-spatial perception and verbal-temporal perception. Sight has 106 times more speed of perception, and it is the dominant spatial organ of the body. Yet because of such spatial speed, temporal depth of perception, is minimal in the eye. So men needed a language-sense to perceive time. That temporal role, the memory of man is not the eye-memory but the word memory. And both organs-languages create the human mind adventure.

 

Senses: openings of internal organs to the Universe.

 

The senses are only the ‘openings’ to the Universe of the more complex internal organs of our body or mind. As such they collect sensations about the information and energy deployed in the Universe, that are latter evolved in the brain.

 

It turns out in fact that each side of the brain corresponds in a higher degree to spatial or temporal knowledge. So also our brain is divided in two elements, as everything else in the Universe. A zone that analyzes energy and a zone that analyzes information, mixing them into perception. That duality can also be applied to the senses. There will be therefore senses of the body arrows of energy, information and reproduction, and senses of the brain arrows:

 

Body Senses:

 

– The  sense of taste which is an opening to the digestive organs, that devolve food. It is a sense to obtain energy for the human organism. As such it qualifies different chemical species according to the needs for ‘energy species’ and ‘information’ species of the body. Hence the existence of four simple sensations related to those species.

The positive information food is the salty taste, which is caused by the positive Na and K ions used by the neuron cells to create nervous impulses.

The negative information food is given by the bitter sense, proper of many poisons. As such it informs the brain about informative foods that should not be eaten.

The positive energy food is given by the sweet taste proper of energy molecules such as sugars.

The negative energy food is given by acid tastes, proper of the destruction of energy molecules and production of H protons.

It is then obvious that the brain is interested in knowing the energy and information values of the universe, and the senses such as taste merely analyze those values for the particular human organism.

 

– The sense of touch based in the skin, which helps to reproduce the body. As such it is the opening to the reproductive-sexual organs that perceive through sexual excitation on the skin.

It is the primary sense, based in pressure, the simple beating of expansion-pleasure, implosion-pain. Related to that duality we have different ‘senses of touch’, temperature, pressure and different combinations of those sensations, that give birth to different frictions, and textures.

It is obvious again that the different sensations perceived by the skin are also dual energy/information systems of knowledge:

– Cold temperature is related to information, to lack of movement.

– Hot temperature is related to energy, to molecular movement.

Both are perceived through pressure, and are just the most elaborated way to perceive pressure which corresponds to the two directions of the Universe:

– Expansive movements of the Universe, that cause an imploding pressure are related to negative energy, weight and force. They cause pain in as much as they are negative and reduce the vital space of the organism that suffers them.

– Expansive movements of the body, that cause an explosive pressure are related to positive energy, and force. They cause pleasure in as much as they employ a positive expansion of our vital space.

 

– The sense of smell, is the informative sense of the body that allows the localization of information on food. It is also the opening to the lung systems that gathers energy for mind and body.

As the sense of information it is the most accurate sense of the body, and it has a precision of around 10.000 times the precision of the related sense of taste. As such it should have been born of the evolution of the sense of taste. In that view we can consider again easily the basic smells of this sense, in relationship to the positive and negative sensations produced by molecules.

So there are to start with two basic positive and negative electric smells related to the positive and negative perception of ions in related tastes…

– The negative smell of rotten food is perceived as the existence of positive ions as it is in fact perceived the negative taste of acid food.

– The positive sense of hot food is perceived as the existence of negative ions, and it is the equivalent of salt.

 

As the evolution of the sense of smell increased we find new smells beyond that primary dual form, based in the morphology of molecules, which again are divided in ‘energy smells’ of lineal molecules, and ‘information smells’ of cyclical, rounded molecules. So we find the

– Energy smells of flowers, and ether.

– The informative smells of camphor and musk

– And the balanced smell of mint.

 

Combining those simple 2+5=7 basic decoupling of smells we can obtain all other smells of the life Universe…

 

Head senses.

 

Again  head senses allow us to perceive the energy and information elements of the external Universe.

– The sense of sight is the sense of the  spatial organs of the brain. As such it sees space. And it does so again concentrating in the energy and informative properties of the main force of space, light. So we have rods which perceive mainly the energy of light, its intensity and as such are single elements connected to single neurons. And we have cones, that have been divided, informatively in 3 subspecies for the 3 basic sub colors. As such it sees less energy and perceives with light more information about the objects it reflects. So we have a simple 1-3 scheme of perceptors of the energy of light and the information of the objects light scans.

 

–  The voice, and ears, are the informative/reproductive organs of the mind in as much as they allow temporal communication and imprinting-reproduction of verbal ideas in other minds. They are the openings to our temporal brain. Again the systems of sound are based in energy and information sounds. So we perceive treble as informative sounds much more distinguishable, and bass sounds as energy sounds. Again those sensations are related to forms that come towards us, creating pressure in our vital territory (Doppler effect that creates treble sounds), and species that go away and create bass sounds (Doppler effect for sounds that go away and become bass). So the fascinating fact of sounds is that again they allow us to perceive vital phenomenon related to our survival and expansion-implosion of our territorial space. Again sounds can be easily divided, as with the case of human vowels, in energy sounds (A,e), information sounds (O,u), and balanced sounds (i). So with words and sounds mankind codified the energy and information species of the universe. Interesting to see that again energy sounds are created earlier, and in the paleogenesis of children they start saying a, ma, pa, ta, the energy sounds and energy consonants. What opens the beginning of a fascinating adventure, the evolution of the human mind, the evolution of languages…

The survival sense…

 

Finally we arrive to the most important sense, the sense of reproduction/information of the human mind. It is the sense which has more connections with the internal organs of the human being. It is the sense of feelings. Which allow us to reproduce our mind and evolve socially with other humans in social groups. To do so it balance mind and body…

The sixth sense, or balanced sense of feelings, connects internally the head and its energy-body. It directs the body, or energy of the head according to verbal orders. Feelings are the Energy sense of the informative head that communicates the head with his energy-body. The sixth sense, the ‘feelings’, connect the external behavior of the mind-body. Since they establish the relationship between the external eye-perception, and the internal world of body=heart perception – the energy of the mind – they are the survival, harmonic sense, regulator of the sense of existence, in the activities of the brain.

The sixth sense, the ‘feelings’ are internal to the structure of the mind-body. Since they establish the relationship between the external eye-perception, and the internal world of body=heart perception. To that aim we sense through endocrine systems with a central organ in the centered base of the brain – probably the thalamus – the communicator zone between body and brain.

 

Balance is survival; the feelings of balance

Feelings are attached to the verbal/sound system that reproduces information and understands internally through its expression of feelings both the needs of the body and the brain. Again this fact puts verbal information slightly above eye information as the balanced language of biological survival. This will be latter proved when we analyze the syntax of words, and the cannon of ethics.

Survival and reproductive functions of the body-mind system are expressed by the word, which expresses it through feelings.

In a healthy body it is the endocrine intermediate system of feelings, the Thalamus, what truly tells man the paths of survival. People who are controlled by eye-rushes or sexual rushes, are easy victims of the environment, since only feelings provide the survival experience. While eye and sex sensations are mechanisms of immediate reward, that fall in existential traps. So happens in history which was controlled during  most of its existence by collective feelings of social love and ethic words. As such words are the most balanced and ‘wise’ of human senses and languages. Yet its informative capacity is inferior to that of the eye. So feelings and words can be manipulated by the “I”=eye sense, causing problems of selfish, individual non-survival behavior is proper of eye-cultures that seem to ignore the canon of ethics provided by words. The eye evidence dominates in those races, species [men], and cultures [industrial cultures], even in Syntax. So for example in English you start sentences with the individualistic ‘I’, your language is simple, and restricted in words to explain emotions. No wonder English is the language of science, mathematics, and industry.

Only today when truly the Nordic species obsessed by information and machines have controlled history, and created extinctive cultures of sensorial repression and repression of feelings [Jewish-Anglo-Saxon, Japanese and Germanic cultures], man is destroying his natural ecosystem without any moral or survival sense. Why? Because he is no longer a balanced-feeling man. He does not have feelings for Human History. He does not realize that his body needs to survive life-energy, the energy of his body.

He has extinct culturally and racially, body and feelings, sensorial experience. And so he only enjoys eye illusions, today given by computers and televisions. Our culture biased to eye-informative sensations is not fit to survive, because it has forgotten the pleasures and sensations of the body, from sensorial art, to food, to sex.  It prefers eye images to the feelings of the heart and the love for natural human goods and other human beings.

The biological will of man.

Feelings as communicators of body-mind sensations are the survival and reproductive functions of the body-mind system. As such they are the most balanced and ‘wise’ of human senses. Yet because its complexity is lesser than that of the eye-world, they can be manipulated by the “I”=eye, the center of informative power. The brain then releases chemical particles that the heart-blood-body system can understand to guide the body [of which adrenaline is the best known].
4. The ego: blood and nervous networks.

Yet the senses are only the aperture to the internal human Universe. In that internal human Universe, we again observe, as in all other Universal organisms of ‘Russian dolls’, 3 fundamental systems which are your perception of yourself. Indeed you do not go as afar as to perceive your cells. You only perceive what we have called the higher plane of existence of our cellular body. And that higher plane of existence are the 3 systems that distribute energy, information and reproductive orders among your cells, according to the sensorial evidence, and sensorial capture of external  energy and information. We might say that those 3 systems are your internal soul, your self, tied to the sensorial external systems.

The centers of control: heart and eye

 

 Which are the centers of decision on the body and the head? The centers of max. perception of energy – the heart; and maximum informative perception: the eye.

This happens for physiological reasons: the eye processes much more information per unit of time than any other organ of the head. While the heart is the strongest muscle able to move much more energy-blood than any other system of the body.

So the will and human body perception is in the heart, and the will and mind perception is in the brain. Both have to be harmonic to make a species survive.

Since your body and your brain are equally important, as energy and information are equally important in the Universe. The key to a well run organism is precisely the harmony, balance between body and brain, energy and information.

The proportionality between body and brain, energy and information is a fundamental law of the Universe, reinforced by the fact that species which are harmonic between body and brain, survive. It is a tautology based in the fact that the Universe is made of both components, energy and information, space and time; and you are part of that Universe.

This complementarity is fundamental to understand a balanced culture, in which goods for both elements, customs Social behaviors, cater to the needs of bodies and brains.

There are however cultures specialized in brain activities [information cultures], and cultures specialized in body activities [energy cultures], which are not balanced, for reasons we will discover latter. Those cultures are often subject to the same laws that any unbalanced organism which does not take care of all his elements and networks: sickness, war and death. Since the absolute law of organic existence: Energy≈ Information, applies at any level of the organism.

 

The networks of mankind as an organism: internal will

 

What we see first when we observe a human being, the external head, and the body, and the senses are only the external aperture to the internal human organism, which is the true origin of our will. To tie up both systems the human being has established 3 internal networks,  the nervous system which extends the power of the informative brain, the blood system which regulates the energy of the body, and the endocrine system which regulates the reproduction of cells and the entire organism, or reproductive network.

Thus in that internal human organism, we observe, as in all other Universal organisms, 3 fundamental network systems of energy, information and reproduction, the blood energy system, the nervous information system and the endocrine systems, which deliver orders to your body and brain.

The nervous system has its nodal center in the head-brain-eye, the blood/energy system in the body; the reproductive system in the genitals. Those 3 centers are also the centers of your will. However only the informative brain decides directly. The other two centers of will in man, body/sex, have to ask ‘permission’ to the brain, which therefore decides which of the 3 wills, ‘energy-information-reproduction’ of a biological organism you will follow.

The brain however is wise. Since the rest of the body can send it pain messages, if it does not collaborate. So for all purposes you can consider yourself a species that will constantly try to get information about his environment, to gather energy from that environment, and reproduce if possible in that environment, in order to satisfy ‘your-self’, your networks of consciousness, which are your perception of yourself. Indeed you do not go as afar as to perceive your cells. You only perceive the networks, what we might call the higher plane of existence of our cellular body. That higher plane of existence are the 3 network systems that distribute energy, information and reproductive orders among your cells, according to sensorial evidence of external  energy and information. We might say that those 3 systems are your internal soul, your self, tied to the sensorial external systems.

The blood system causes your external body-activity, movement, and physical force. Your endocrine system, causes your external feelings, desire to communicate, and love, gather with other humans and reproduce. Your nervous/informative system, causes the linguistic activity of your mind, your capacity to process sound information into meaningful words, and electro-magnetic information into visual images. Your mind, the origin of art…

The importance of the networks as the will and consciousness of yourself is evident. There are even a medical classification of humans in 3 types, depending on the dominance of one or other system. Nervous, ‘picnic’ people, tall, thin, brainy’; athletic, ‘sanguine’ people, based in the blood system, and finally people for whom the emotions and chemical desires dominate their organism.

You can say that your will is in your networks, even though you express it externally through your body and brain, and the senses, which are outlets of those networks to the external Universe.

Your cells exist as independent units [as you exist independently of the social nation] but are controlled by the nervous and blood and endocrine systems which are what you perceive more intensely as you [so you are also controlled by legal/nervous systems, and economic/energy systems in a nation].

The center of control of your cellular body is chemical. We sense through endocrine systems with a central organ in the base of the brain – the thalamus – the communicator zone between body and brain. Of all those networks the dominant element that reacts faster to external aggression, is the nervous/informative system. It is your mind, the center of this book, submissive to the eye who perceives the space-time coordinates of man.

We talk of a preying pyramid within the human being among its 3 networks, attached organs and senses.

 


5. The ages of the human kind.

 

The ages of organisms. The 3 ages of species

 

Once the duality energy-body, brain-information of all Universal organisms has been established, the existence of 3 ages, energy-youth, maturity-balance, and old age, or information age in Universal organisms can be easily deduced by the fact, that the organism is ruled by the head of information.

Since the head of information constantly controls and uses the body to absorb energy, it is natural to find, that when the organism starts its life, it has more energy. He is young.

Then, as the organism lives, the selfish brain absorbs that energy, and trans-forms it into form, into in-form-nation. So energy diminishes and information grows. For example. You feed on energy and you trans-form energy into your cellular information. Neurons feed on the body system without giving back any energy at all.

Son information accumulates in cycles and forms, in pattern and wrinkles.

At a certain stage, the energy and the information of the being are in balance. That is the age of maturity.

Yet information keeps accumulating till the being has hardly any energy left to trans-form. He is all form, information. He is in the third age. Finally without energy the organism collapses and dies.

This simple explanation of why there are 3 ages in all beings is validated by the fact, that all organisms develop 3 networks.

– The energy network [i.e.: your blood system, the weapon system of economic nations]

– The information network [your nervous system, the metal-mind networks of economic nations].

– The balanced, reproductive network [your endocrine system of hormones, and sexual organs, the monetary and reproductive system of company-mothers of machines in economic nations.

So as the being lives, the predominance of information over energy, displaces the center of the organism, from the network of energy to the reproductive network, to the information network.

We perceive that phenomena externally as the 3 ages of the being, that becomes older, informed, corrugated.

 

For example, young people are full of energy. They are in the Energy horizon of the species. They are bigger, have little temporal knowledge. They are simple in form. While Old people are full of information. They are in the information horizon of the species. They are smaller, have a lot of temporal knowledge. They move little, and have a lot of wrinkles.

Finally mature people, have such perfection and balance between the two elements of the organic universe, between their content of energy-space, and temporal information, that they can reproduce the entire being, in all its components. Hence the second age is the age of reproduction. Its forms are ‘wave’ forms, realist forms, combination of lines and cycles, the more complex forms, the most efficient forms.  So in all species the mature, realistic, classic age of balance, or reproductive age, is the most perfect age. Human beings intuitively see that. We like spiral galaxies, mature people, realist art, which is called classic art…

 

The wave of existence of human and historical organisms.

 

So we can trace with those simple notions about organic social networks, a wave of existence for man, either as an individual or a cell of a social organism [civilization], with 3 ‘ages’: youth-energy, maturity-reproduction, and 3rd age or information age, in which each network dominates, till finally the informative mind become the controller of human behavior, exhausting the blood system and killing the species. A wave that we will analyze in detail in its historical context, since the 3 ages of man cause ‘behavioral traits’, young-mature-old attitudes not only in individuals but also in Civilizations.

 

 

The wave of existence is self-explanatory: man is born as body-energy, and as it grows older its eye-brain controls his body and personality, becoming an informative being. Then his body starts to die.

 

The causes of life and death: Balance of energy and information.

 

From the theory of the 3 ages we establish a fundamental law in the Universe, the law of balance between spatial energy and temporal information, that all survival beings, mature beings follow:

 

Spatial energy = Temporal Information,  S=T,  E=i.

 

It is a universal law that will allow us to establish basic rules of quality in culture and art. It is the foundation of our aesthetics and ethics based in harmony, in a classic sense of proportion and balance between body and mind, that has inspired all the great artistic cultures of history. It was called by the Buddhist the rule of the golden mean. It was the fundamental law followed by the Greek culture. A law today forgotten in favor of the ‘third age’, the information that kills life-bodies, that kills societies.

 

Limits of an energy=information organism.

 

Indeed the fundamental cause of death is to exist beyond the balance of form between the Spatial-energy and Temporal-informative components of a being. All beings have limits of excess of energy, and excess of temporal form, information, which will bring their extinction and destruction of the networks that shape the being.

Death is basically the constant preying of the nervous system, the informative system over the blood system, till it exhausts it and kills the body. the same can be told of human societies, where death is caused by the constant abuse of the ‘information castes’, the social elites, over the energy cells, the poor, the workers, the people below. Such processes end in revolutions and wars, in collapses of the social organism. Then the organism will not be. When the energy/blood system collapses the nervous system dies, and the cells become untied. Your consciousness as a social network disappears. Your ego will become untied cells.

 

The process of life and death in a human being.

 

In other books (“Theory of Times”) we have seen the fundamental cause of death: to exist beyond the balance of form between the S and T components of a being. All beings have limits of excess of energy, and excess of form which will bring their extinction into lower or higher planes of existence in which the form will not be; or will be a knotted slave of a higher form.

Then the being will not be. It will become untied energy, or it will release its code into the higher being. If we call Oi-1 the lower plane of cellular existence, and Oi+1 the higher plane of social existence, you exist between those two planes as an Oi-informative mind that is born as a cell grows into this plane of reality and sometimes enters the realm of social thought, when your work is worth to be kept by the social organism of history, or perhaps a metaphysical God if they exist as the fusion of verbal souls:

 

Only the existence between two waters, the pleasure of the human senses, the reproduction that does not evolve or devolve the body, but keeps it in a static in and out, cycle and line together, is good, and it is the ultimate aim of all healthy species.

 


6. Sex and race: The law of 3 creations.

 

The first specialization. Races

 

Body and brain are equally important, yet they are not developed in the same manner in all human species, or human cultures, or even human ages. It is then important to understand without racism, or cultural bias, that humanity has different specializations at cultural, racial, sexual and age level, between both components of all Universal organisms. The origin of racism, sexual discrimination, and other cultural wrong tendencies is caused by the fact that many cultures do not recognize the need to balance both components, and impose one over the other, despising those who do not follow its bias.

The racial specialization is imposed by geography. Tropical cultures/races receive more energy and verbal information so they have specialized in body activities, and verbal languages of information. Northern cultures/races receive less energy and more visual information, so they have specialized in information activities and visual-mathematical languages of information. Problem with those races is that they bias against energy/body activities, and against verbal information their culture, despising all other cultures. They do not understand the law of balance in the Universe. They repress body activities, sexual activities, destroy nature, and the animal kingdom, and worship machines of information and mathematical science. They despise words, ethic verbal information… They are as we shall see wrong. Yet they have imposed their views that information is superior to energy, heads superior to bodies, and all men should abandon their body, to the point that today most energy races despise their own nature… and verbal minds feel inferior to visual minds, writers feel inferior to mathematicians, verbal women, feel inferior to spatial-mathematical men… They should not.

We divide human races in 3 groups, according to cultural specialization;

– Black, Tropical cultures/races specialized in energy/body/sound languages.

– Pale-Yellow/White-blonde Northern races specialized in information/eye/ mathematical languages.

– Tempered, suntan/black hair cultures/races: Mediterranean, South Asian races which find a balance between both kind of activities.

Obviously according to the Fundamental Law of Universal organisms, the law of balance between body and brain, energy and information, this 3rd type of culture is the most harmonic of human cultures, which should be imitated by the other two cultures. There are indeed ‘qualities’ in the Universe, since there are laws that regulate the survival and well-being of Universal organisms.

The law of balance between body and brain, energy and information is such fundamental law.

Thus those races and cultures which specialize too much in the body or the mind [life cultures and eye cultures] often because of bio-geographical reasons [ tropical body species in regions of max. heat and physical-chemical perception Vs Nordic/desert eye species in regions of max. light perception, such as the Jewish/Germanic cultures are not harmonic.

The result is that Energy cultures are abused and suffer since they do not fully grasp the complex civilization in which we live. On the other hand as we shall see the Northern cultures are destroying the ecosystem of life and abusing non-technological cultures they despise, and will end committing suicide with the entire species. Both behaviors prove how wrong is to deny the basic biological nature of man as a species, and our needs, as universal organisms.

Only in tempered zones both body/brain perceptions are balanced by complex verbal languages, and visual, artistic languages [Mediterranean, North-India South China regions]. We consider those cultures the best cultures of man, since they are balanced, and hence maximize the human function of body/brain existence.

If you need a prove of their quality in history, it is a fact that they have discovered most of the artistic and sensorial tools of man. Their prophetic verbal ideas talk properly about the survival of man [love religions, Buddhist philosophies of the living Universe]. Both in the Western and Eastern World they have given birth to the main verbal and visual masters of Human culture.

On the other hand tropical cultures are typically focused in sexual, sport and food activities, body activities of lesser cultural quality; while northern-eye cultures are guided by religions of body-repression and their worship of machines, the main cause of extinction of life species. A theme to which we will return latter.

An ideal World culture would diminish the informative obsession and the machine obsession of northern culture, and improve the informative education of tropical cultures, to create a single social nation, mankind, in balance between body and brain, energy and information.

 

The second specialization: sexual dimorphism.

 

Another aspect of that duality is sexual dimorphism. In fact there are two types of humans, the female species which are body reproductive and have a better heart-leg system; and the male species, which are mainly mind reproductive and have better eye-arms species.

Thus women are parallel to Tropical races, body oriented, and men are parallel to Northern races, brain oriented.

Again is absurd as feminist do today, to despise the nature of women, and deny it, under cultural bias in favor of informative human cultures. Balance between men and women is the ideal culture.

Accordingly female superior bodies are sensorially richer than men’s bodies. Women have the cyclical forms of complex bodies, able to reproduce. They sense better, have stronger feelings, stronger hearts, live longer, use better words, the main body-language. While in mental attitudes related to the eye-spatial language, are inferior to men.

Ideological denial cannot change the experimental facts, backed by the nature of organisms, and the dimorphism of all species…

Women use their mind to enhance body functions; and when thinking in eye-spatial terms they are simpler, less creative than men. While male superior eye-perception allows him to control space better, as a hunter, warrior, mathematician or machine-designer. Yet their bodies are simple, lineal, of inferior sensorial capacity, and sterile.

This is self evident in History and physiology. Men have  also a spatial brain: it is bigger and weights 20% more than the brain of women, which is however more dense. Women’s neurons are shorter, specialized in verbal and feeling languages. Women have a better heart, center of the body, with more veins. Men do create more spatial machines, and women do create children with their bodies. It might be not politically correct, but the truth has nothing to do with political correctness but with facts.

It is fundamental to bear in mind that the Universe is a probabilistic game of distributions. So we talk here only of wave situations not of individuals. Exceptions are merely variations over the ‘bell curve’ of body/brain dominance which makes a few men body dominant, and a few women brain dominant [mostly women of eye Nordic cultures, and men of body-tropical cultures]. Such bell curve explains also ‘the third sex’. Men who feel as women, and women who feel as men. They also prove that duality body/brain. Gay men love their bodies, and lesbian women love their minds… They specialize in the natural essence of the other sex.

It is also important to remember that both types are needed, since a harmonic species is one in which the balance of informative/energy organs exists:

 

                                   Space-energy=Time-information

 

is the absolute law that defines the composition of the total Universe. We exist in a universe of spatial energy and temporal information. We need both parameters to survive.

In general the Universe tends to do dual species, since when they are symbiotic, as men and women should be, the superiority of one species in the body-energy system, and the other species in the mind-informative system, enhances the range of total perception of the species, and its chances of survival.

Sex is natural to all species.

The male species has a higher density of informative organs, the female species maximizes the energy organ.

Both species exist in all environments for a single reason: the universe is creative, and when a certain species is born, it will try to create new forms from that species. The easier way to create new forms, will be stressing the two possible arrows of energy and information of the species. So there will soon be a maxi-energy species or ‘female species’, a maxi-informative species, or male species, and the balanced middle species – the couple.

This is the origin not only of sexes, but of the generic 3-subclasses of almost all Universal Organisms.

So in races we saw the existence of 3 basic survival species: the maxi-energy tropic races, the maxi-mind yellow, blonde races, and the balanced white/black hair races.

We could talk of a very simple creative system in the Universe.

A certain species is born. Then it will divide into 3 subspecies:

 

 Max. Body= female;  Max.  Head = male;

Balanced couple  = reproductive, efficient top predator.

 

Symbiotism and complementarity between female and male is the key to understand sexual species and their capacity to carry further the organic evolution of the Universe.

The complementary law that so many times comes out in this book, now allow us to affirm the natural need for different male-female, mind-body cultures.

This happens also at cultural level, where eye races should not control but learn from body races.

The third specialization: metal-cultures.

 

In the graph of Universal organisms, we have highlighted organisms symbiotic between metal and human beings. What we call animetals. Such organisms tend to put together an informative species of metal – basically money – and a human brain – a trader. Or an energy element of metal – basically weapons – and a human body. Both species are symbiotic in as much as they are bodies of carbolife and bodies of metal, or ‘energy species’, and cycles of metal-information, and cycles of human information [brains].

In this manner, there have been a fourth specialization which is fundamental to history: certain human beings have become specialized in the use of weapons, as warriors, who worship their bodies, their physical strength and the properties of lineal metal, of swords and weapons.

On the other hand there are cultures specialized in trade, which use as their tool of power money. They are information cultures that worship knowledge, information, creation, form.

Two examples: the Arab culture, a warrior culture, and the Jewish culture, a trader culture. Their opposition well known throughout history is the same kind of formal opposition that exists between energy and information. What is better an informative culture or an energy culture?

According to the laws of balance and survival in the Universe, none of them, but a third kind of culture: the balanced culture in which body and brain, are cherished. Those cultures are not deformed by their symbiotism with weapons and money. They are ruled by the third language of human power, which is words, ethics, verbal thought, laws.

As we shall see those cultures are also the cultures that have created the best ‘human art’, that have survived better, that have suffered less wars and Holocausts throughout history, proving once more that the laws of social Organisms, and the laws of survival and social evolution are common to all social species, including cultures and civilizations.

 


7: The will of man.

 

Information, energy, reproduction, social evolution

 

We can talk as a consequence of the existence of informative / energetic / reproductive networks of a biological will, common to all Universal organisms including man. Externally, the existence of our 3 networks of information, energy and the balanced endocrine network of chemical feelings, reproduction and survival, mean that man has a ‘biological will’, which limits or rather constructs his freedom around the desire for energy [food, home, vital space, property] and information [ verbal and visual knowledge]. We are not ‘free’ in a complete sense. We are first survival species, and so dedicate most of our time to collect energy/information that makes our body and brain survive. When those two tasks are accomplished we look for the combined task of reproducing our body of energy, and brain of information in other place of the Universe.

The existence of biological organisms is driven by such needs, which cater to your two fundamental organs of existence, your body that requires certain energy species, and your head that requires certain information species. Organisms are composed of bodies and brains. To live is to inform your brain with correct information that fulfills the existence of your mind, and guides your body on its natural search for energy. Your body will then feed on the right energy, move with that energy, and feed the brain.

You can think of yourself as a modular being, with two components. The head, its senses, and languages of perception dominate your body, which relies on the head to act and move rightly in a rather dangerous universe. When your head has bad information it risks your body, which gets hurt, suffers accidents, eats poisons, falls in traps of death. It is for that reason that the first good to have is right information to survive. Then the proper energy for your body.

We live in a game that we might call existence. To survive in the game of existence, you have to feed on the two components of the universe, ‘temporal information’, and ‘spatial energy’. This fact is a  self-evident tautology. Since we live in a Universe made of ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’ we need a volume of vital space that gives us energy to move around, feed, heat and survive, and a volume of temporal information, that allow us to perceive, sense and feel.

When we fulfill those 2 needs to the best of our possibilities, we exist, and we are happy. When we have hyper-abundance of those two components, human energy and human information we have wealth, and health. Then we can even think on the ultimate luxury of life: to reproduce, to have a family to ‘repeat’ our existence, or spatial form and temporal=genetic information, in other location of the space-time universe, and create a child.

That is what human existence is all about, isn’t?.

In order to stress those tendencies of our existence, the wise universe has reinforced our behavior with natural instincts, and sensorial pleasure. When we reproduce, the ultimate goal that fulfills existence we feel an enormous pleasure. This is good. It is called an orgasm. It is the ultimate good of God=the laws of the universe, which tell us biologically speaking: “You have made it. You have achieved enough energy and information as a species to become a top predator of your environment. Now you can relax and repeat yourself, your existence, in your genetic son. I am happy with you: Grow and multiply”.

To reproduce however, you need to grow and satisfy the individual cells of your body with proper energy and information. What is proper human energy and information?

 

Energy to feed your cells, which in the human case is carbolife energy, since you do not eat electricity or oil; and information to feed your mind, which in the human case comes through two basic senses, the spatial eye and the temporal word; and so it has a visual and verbal nature.

Again, we feel this intuitively. When we eat well, and when we are warm, and when we live surrounded by ‘natural property’, a comfortable home, a nicely urbanized environment, a safe surroundings in which we do not need to fight and defend our property, our body feels happy. We feel satisfied. Also when we receive natural information, when we see beautiful, proportionate images, and hear nice words, that talk about love, and communication among human beings, or explain us the why and how of things, in verbal terms, that we naturally understand, we feel realized, intelligent, sensitive and perceptive.

We feel then a mental pleasure, happiness, a subtle pleasure not so intense as the body pleasure that the ultimate goal of reproduction give to us, but a warm pleasure.

 

Human goods.

 

There is therefore a clear definition for abstract concepts as property, happiness, survival, will, and freedom –  a biological definition: the pursuit of human goods that provide the best possible energy and information, goods that we will call artistic goods, when they provide us with information of the highest quality. So we now have to define human information to be able to define artistic goods, also in a biological manner.

So now that we have a biological vision of man, and how that biological vision of man relates us to the external world, we can concentrate in the Head, and its languages, words and visual experience, in the mind of man, which is the origin of artistic activity.

 


8. The informative will: The mind, perceptor of space and time.

 

The eye-word: function of existence of the mind of man

 

Many times we have wondered what means to be a man; what is the essence of Humanity.

We could argue the nature of man from a negative point of view. Let’s imagine that you loose your eyes and you loose the capacity to talk not only externally but internally with those words that we call thoughts. You would be without sight and without thoughts. Then, we could say you have ceased to be a man. Indeed. If we want to define man by his peculiar nature; by what makes man different from most entities of the Universe, we will be obliged to affirm conclusively that the ‘eye-word’, the eye perception and the ‘words’ we use to act and communicate differentiates man from other species.

The consciousness of man can be written as a chain of repetitive events that takes place through words and eyes in a certain order: from past perception of space [eye perception] to future consciousness in verbal time [word perception]. Words are indeed used by man to take decisions on the World he will construct in time, after having perceived that world in space with the eyes.

So we define the ‘soul’ or consciousness of man as the eye-Word, which becomes the space-time function of the human mind.

We could add a 3rd element, the hand, which allows the eye-word to create the world he thinks of.

Yet before acting with your hands, you use a priori words or sub-phonic words [thoughts] that help you to take decisions. So mankind constructs a World based upon his visual experience, latter elaborated with words.

That world based on words, is what we call the Wor(l)d. What distinguishes man from all other animal species.

 

The human mind.

 

When considering the nature of organisms with bodies that process space=energy and brains that process time=information, it is relatively easy to understand how bodies work. The processes of feeding and construction of living structures in space with bodies=organs of energy, are well known to scientists. However the theme of the mind has so far escaped the scientific method. Since the scientific method ignores the nature of quantic space-time, which truly determines the nature of the minds of the different species of the Universe.

So scientists still try to understand the mind with spatial evidence, when we are dealing with a temporal species, in which the external world of space-time is as important as the chemical world that records it inside the brain.  What is the mind of human beings? How does the mind work? How perception takes place?  Those are questions that have to be answered from the point of view of our capacity to perceive spatial energy and temporal information, which is created through languages of thought.

What are those languages?

 

The languages of man. Our eye-world.

 

It seems rather clear that we exist in the Universe, which is itself perceived by man with two variables that we call time and space.

In that external universe is where social evolution takes place. We do not tie with other men with our bodies, but with our minds, and the actions of those minds in the Space-time Universe. The nature of time and Space is thus fundamental to reach a clear understanding of Humanity and History.

Time-information and Space-Energy are not easy to define. For practical purposes today time tends to be defined with clocks of metal, and space tends to be measured with light instruments. However men do not have clocks of metal within themselves. Men define time and space with his own ‘tempometers’ and ‘spaciometers’.  What are those main human instruments of measure of time and space?

It seems self-evident: we measure space with the eye. And we perceive the changes caused by the passing of time with Words that carry temporal memory.

The eye thus is the spatial meter of man, and the wor[l]d and brain the temporal meter of man. It is for that reason that the eye>wor[l]d defines the soul of man, because it defines the peculiar manner in which man perceives the Universe of Time-information and Space-Energy.

The eye perceives space with light. It perceives in fact what we could call light space.

This might surprise you but you do not perceive the entire Universe. According to recent calculus you perceive only 1 or 10% of that Universe – the rest is called dark matter. And this happens because your energy of space perception is only light, and you perceive only the space where light is. So you create a relative Spatial map of reality with the same 3 perpendicular dimensions of light [height, width, length which in light are called electric, magnetic and speed arrows]. Your eye creates with that light a spatial representation of reality. And that is your spatial Universe. The light Universe. The light Universe though has a problem from the practical point of view of survival: it is a very fast mapping of reality. At 300.000 Km/s, the eye has no ‘temporal latitude’. It is flat in ‘temporal distance’. It is so fast that it gives you a ‘slice’ of reality that we call present. Present after present [dharma after dharma as an Eastern philosopher would put it], the eye maps out reality. Because light comes from many places – up to 10% of the total Universe – there is a lot of spatial information in light. Yet around us, in the world we live, light takes a nano-second to reach us. It has no memory. So we need a tempometer, a way to ‘recall’ the experiences of light-space in order to become efficient living entities.

That temporal memory of the light Universe creates in man the Wor[l]d Universe.

So we say that the eye>Wor[l]d is the spatial>temporal or S>T function of the mind of man. What we have defined as the function of existence:

 

Eye≥Wor[l]d: Function of existence of the mind of man.

 

We define to exist as a human being, as ‘I see>Think therefore I am’, ‘I measure space>Time therefore I exist’. The eye is what we call a virtual mirror of the Universe, made with light information.

In the eye, information regarding the Universe is brought to a certain human, existing in a relativistic point of space-time. Since men can be in different locations of time or space.

This information is not all the information about all the Universe, but the limited way light sees the Universe, from a certain frame of space-time reference. If we move in time or Space or change the range of perception of the eye with the help of ‘metal-eyes’, the picture of ‘our Universe’ will change.

The Universe is clearly more extended than what the eye sees. There is dark matter that the eye does not see. There are atoms and languages of perception from smell to heat, that the eye does not see. We thus talk of a virtual image of the Universe, that the eye gathers in the focal point of the eye – a ‘vital painting’, which is what man perceives. And behind that eye there is a brain that thinks with words, which observes the Universe of the eye – since the brain sees even less the ultimate reality. It is like a game of Russian dolls made of languages. You see the total Universe with the eye. The eye is within the Universe and its image is a relative ‘vital painting’ of the Universe. The eye has less information than the Universe. You don’t see reality – that ultimate essence which escapes to you, that ultimate truth which only the Universe holds within himself, with all its information. What you know is always a partial truth of the total reality.  Words are even less detailed in its information that the eye, and when you do not follow the ‘intuitions’ of the eye, but the wor[l]ds you have constructed a posteriori, your information is even more limited.

 

The temporal dimension of words.

 

What is then the use of words? Not certainly to ‘see space’ but to select from that space what is relevant, and store ‘memories of time’, cycles of survival importance about the different species of the Universe.

It is that task, of logical character, in which words have no rival. Words are able to explain in limited time, with limited descriptions what really matters to man or any species about the Universe: the centers of energy, information, the character of rival species, the relationships of cause and effect that create and destroy reality. That memorial capacity which in all other species was done through genetic memories, of very slow mutation, in man could now we done with words, through memetic, and learning processes, creating verbal genetic memories with enormous speed. In this manner men acquired a new dimension of information that no other animals had: the capacity to anticipate the behavior of hotter species knowing through memorial words that such behavior was somehow programmed by the will of organisms, and their specific needs for energy and information. Remembering those needs and cycles, men could know where certain food would be, where certain top predator dwelled, where to find what he himself needed. In this manner words made of men, the next informative top predator of Planet Earth.

 

Selection of species: superiority of the human eye-world:

So man with its two biological languages, eye-images and specially wor[l]ds, has been able to control the Earth’ crust. Man has obtained an enormous power. Because the eye-wor[l]d is complex enough when compared to the eye-world of other beings, to make you a ‘linguistic top predator’, a species which acts and reacts to the Universe with enough speed as to control it.

Eye>wor[l]ds confront each other and the process select the best species.

Eye>wor[l]ds, let’s understand this now and for all, are selfish beings. What they do is gather information on the Universe of other beings with a simple aim: to feed, to capture other beings and use them as their ‘vital space’, from where to obtain forms and energy to perceive.

Think of the Universe as a constant moving reality, in which a certain type of eye-world or ‘specie’, will position himself in order to feed=perceive in flowing forms of energy.

The eye-world has a function which is to perceive. And in order to perceive the eye-world acts upon the external Universe. And in this process you exist.

To exist for man is to perceive with his eye-world. And that man follows a natural mandate: to perceive, to exist, to see and think and act-react with the Universe according to its speed of eye-world perception.

Other beings will perceive other ‘eye-worlds’ faster or slower, ants will perceive slower chemical eyes, insects will perceive ten times faster the eye-worlds. Yet each eye-world will allow the entity to communicate and perceive the Universe, to ‘talk’ with the Universe with a language of communication.

Because the eye-world is ‘communicating’ with that Universe. And the nature of its communication, which is light-mathematical communication and verbal communication defines man. And it defines also the evolution of human knowledge, and History.

It is then clear that knowledge is relative to the language we use to communicate. And each language has a certain value for the survival of the species that use them.

What are the human languages of knowledge? Obviously mathematics and verbal thought.

The human eye-world can be defined as a linguistic focus of light information about the universe, and a focus of air-sound information about the same Universe. The result of those nodes of information are the eye-brain system or human ‘soul’

With those two systems of communication – the virtual worlds of light and words – we perceive a ‘linguistic world’: man is a knot of linguistic worlds, an evolutor of light-eye communication and air-verbal communication. The most complex animal able to communicate through light and air sounds, yet still no more than that: a communicative eye-world.

All sciences of man can be gathered as forms of knowledge in 2 categories: sciences that perceive the Universal game through temporal Wor[l]ds, and sciences that perceive the Universe through spatial Eye geometry. At this point in the evolution of human knowledge we have two very solid theories of reality able to explain the nature of beings in space, and the nature of beings in time, which obviously have to belong to  spatial eye-mathematics, and temporal verbal thought. Those theories are Non-Euclidean mathematics, and Theory of Evolution.

Mathematics is the spatial language of light perception, and understands only what light communicates with us. It is the language of the geometry of light.

Verbal thought is the languages of perception in time, limited by memory, and the way man observes the logic relationships between beings of past and future.

 

CHAPTER 5:

THE EVOLUTION OF  LANGUAGES. ITS 3 AGES.

 

1. Biological radiations of Languages in carbolife. Man top predator.

 

The radiations of animal languages.

 

Evolution of languages has existed on Earth from an earlier biological age to that of human beings. Indeed, the nature of evolution of species on Earth, was also linguistic. There was a first age of smelling species, when olfactory languages became dominant. And trilobites dominated the Earth. Then it came an age of visual species, when images created visual forms in the minds of animals. And the first eye-species cephalopods, followed by chordates, became the kings of creation. As visual capacity grew, new top predator species with better eyes substituted old top predators. Finally apes developed stereoscopic vision and became top predators.

A Biological radiation is the fundamental concept that allows us to organize the evolution of human languages in the Universe.

A radiating species soon becomes the top predator of a vital space, a territory, where it will feed, reproduce its form, and organize through communication, complex systems of distribution of energy and information among its clonic species.

Yet a top predator can never totally control the open Universe.

So within his ecosystem, and territory, in which the species or clonic radiation has established itself, there are certain creative mutations, that bring a new, rival species into being. A new radiation starts, which drives the previous radiations into extinction. It is what we call the Oedipus paradox, since the new species normally comes from the previous species. There first existed anaerobic bacteria. These mutated into aerobic bacteria which used oxygen and destroyed the anaerobic world. Those bacteria were displaced by plants, of rigid structure that allowed social evolution among cells, and the apparition of networks of energy and information of greater size. Plants again were displaced by animals, able not only of using light as a source of energy [chlorophyll process] but also as a source of information. The first eye-animal, the squid extinguished 90% of the species of the pre-cambric age. The evolution of sea animals in the sea created new species, amphibian and reptiles, that became top predators in the Jurassic Age. They developed better eyes in the air space of land ecosystems. Then when reptiles returned to the water, their eyes made them top predators.

Fishes had been unable despite its better body and highly evolved smelling capacity to defeat cephalopods with huge eyes that had survived the radiation of Fishes. Now reptiles coming back to water had better eyes than squids.  We know it because the ictosaurius that dominated the sea in this age, had the biggest marine eye ever found. The second is that of the giant squid…

Yet again the Oedipus paradox was at work, and the ‘sons’ of dinosaurs with better nervous/informative systems extinguished them. Indeed, mammals that  came from small dinosaur species, probably extinguished dinosaurs. Humans that extinguish mammals, come from the mammals. Robots that might extinguish mankind is a creation of human beings.

 

The radiations of human languages.

 

This process of evolution and extinction of species based in languages also happens in History. Among men now visual languages, allow the design of technological forms, based in liens of energy (weapons). And the best visual weapons give power to the owners of those weapons that become dominant species.

Indeed. The first radiation of visual technology was that of the Australopithecus, men of minimal brain evolution, which used simple lineal stone technology.

We call that radiation, the lower Paleolithic.

Then a new species changed all (replaced), son of the Homo Australopithecus, the Homo Erectus, which almost doubled the size of his informative organ or brain, appears. With that new organ of information, he designs better visual lines, better weapons. So he hunts more. He eats more and grows more. He expands his numbers, that colonize the Earth till extinguishing the Homo Australopithecus. It is what we call the Middle Paleolithic.

 

A new language: The Radiation of Eve, the verbal age.

 

Then around 143.000 BC, appears the Homo Sapiens Sapiens. We know that because in genetic clocks, there is a mitochondrial Eve born in those dates from where we all come. So we are a product of the radiation of Homo Sapiens, which appeared in Africa. This new human radiation has a bigger brain than the Homo Erectus, and probably because of his forehead development it has verbal power, to organize hordes of hunters, unlike the Neanderthal.

I think therefore I am defines indeed man, it defined at least potentially all men that became modern when the first Eve acquired a brain able to speak.

Women learn sooner to talk, they talk more, they are ‘temporal species’ who manage better verbal, temporal commands, who have cyclical forms, who remember better, who discovered the cycles of agriculture.

Sexes is a morphological differentiation that specializes each sex, in a language of basic perception. Women perceive better time, information with words. Men perceive better space, and eye-information, mathematics. This has genetic, biological and historical proves, analyzed extensively in other books of this author. So it is very likely that the first ‘human being’ able to speak was a woman. There was an Eve which started the human species, a Universal organism, ruled as all Universal organism by a mind of information. In the case of man, a verbal mind. “I think therefore I am”.

 

It is then when the history of human languages starts. Since among the big apes, one developed a new language of temporal nature, words.

To the point that most biologists consider the first man the first Homo that could talk. Probably the Neanderthal with a tonal scale of very few sounds (e-o vowels and consonants) was such first man. With words came culture and the temporal perception of man – concepts such as life and death.

Then as the phonic system developed fully, the Homo Sapiens Sapiens, the first Homo species with five vowels created languages as we know, and became top predator of Neanderthals. He started the present age of verbal languages, of sound species, commanded by human beings. Finally man himself – according to the Oedipus Paradox – has developed mathematics, machines and the digital language of numbers they speak…

So we can follow in the geological scale the evolution of languages, and its species through those languages.

– The age of smelling languages, or age of ‘insects’ in water (Cambric or age of trilobites) and land (Carboniferous or age of Insects) followed by the age of…

– Visual languages, or age of cephalopods and fishes in the sea; and age of Reptiles and mammals on the land.

– The age of Sound languages, or age of Cetaceans in the sea, and age of humans on the land…

– The age of digital languages, or age of machines.

 

Time accelerates with languages of higher information.

The evolution of those languages is definitive to understand the evolution of species on earth. We are concerned only with the last 2 ages, which are the historic ages of human beings, and machines… To notice the ‘acceleration’ of evolution languages cause. This phenomena studied in other books of this author proves the parallelism between information and languages. As languages carry more information, and process and change information faster, the evolution of its species accelerates. This explains why History is such a fast phenomena compared to Biological evolution. Now thanks to verbal languages, memetics instead of genetics accelerates enormously the evolution of thought. The process is the same, based in the memorial nature of the Universe, that constantly repeats and mutates its form along the path of 3 creations. However as languages become more complex and reach in information, they evolve in a faster manner, and the events they command, take place much faster. So the geological ages of the Earth evolve at increasing rate.

Indeed, the age of smelling languages can be traced from the first cells some 3000 million years ago, to the first cephalopod, some 500 million years ago.

The age of sound languages, lasts only 100.000 years since the first Homo appeared.

The age of mathematical languages has lasted only 400 years since the scientific method affirmed that only mathematics was an authorized top predator language of truthness (provoking the fictional decadence of verbal thought).

This is worrisome, since as time-information accelerates the chances for man to survive the fastest digital machines of this age (computers, chips, robots) dwindle.

We could study each of those linguistic ages through its species, its forms, bodies and brains, to show how they went through 3 ages, of energetic, lineal expansion, balance of form, and final cyclical development. Take the case of cephalopod, the first visual species. Their visual specialization went to the extreme of developing a visual way of communication, changing with pigments their colors to show different emotions. In this manner silent squids dominated the Earth. They were first lineal, and grew in size, as they were top predators of the latter Cambric age. Then they diversified in multiple species during the Ordovician and Carboniferous. Yet in their third age as they became preys of the most developed eyes of reptiles and fishes, most of their species disappeared, and the ammonites (spiraloid, well protected cephalopod), the cyclical form appeared.

Read back if you need the analysis of the 3 ages of Temporal, linguistic species, because it is the key to understand the creation, evolution and extinction of cultural and artistic forms, and human languages, the theme of the rest of this book.

 

Today we assist to the third age of verbal languages, the ‘fictional age’ of human cultures, as numbers start to control through the mind of machines (computers, cameras) our civilization. And we assist to a parallel decadence of verbal art, law and religions. We only ‘believe’ numbers, either in polls of political power (including the so called vote of democracies), as money  that make us survive, and value all things, or as digital science, that tells us what is truth, even as digital images that show us the ‘authorized’ TV version of reality.

Words no longer matter. Such is the tragedy of human extinction that other species suffered in the past.

We and our closer species, the dolphins of highly developed verbal intelligence, are becoming degraded and extinct by the new species, the machine and his languages, the number.

 

The capacity of intelligent species to control the decadence of form

 

The process of decadence of human languages, guided by the laws of 3 creations and the 3 ages seems automatic, if we objectively analyze how human languages grew in power, reached a summit of complexity and richness and then decayed. As our individual bodies do. However as we renew our body in our children, human languages can be renewed generation after generation. Its extinction and fictional degradation was not necessary if humans fought properly to control the decadence of our body and languages, repressing the evolution of the rival digital languages… Species survive by having babies, and taking healthy measures against enemy species. Human languages could have survived by renewal through education (the equivalent in memetics to genetic babies) generation upon generation, and by taking social measures to control rival digital species (today chips, computers, robots and TVs).

They have destroyed the rational, logic, non-fictional, informative power of verbal languages. They have destroyed the educational capacity of ethic words and religions, of laws and art. Since men have not cared to control digital languages, and rival machines species, since men do not care to educate their children, we see the decadence of culture and human beings in a rather mechanical way, as a natural process of extinction of our civilization and its sacred artistic and religions, legal and literary forms…


2. The 3 ages of languages.

 

The nature of languages as vital species, carried by hardware-brains, used by vital organisms to defend themselves and survive in the Universe, is essential to know a fact that will allow to classify the different forms of art and languages: the existence of 3 vital ages in the forms of languages, cultures and artistic species.

Amazing as it seems  linguistic forms, as individuals do, live through a first age of youth, in which the language shows enormous energy, and the species that talk the language becomes top predator of the ecosystem.

Then the language matures and the species becomes established in balance with that ecosystem. Finally as new languages, civilizations or species take away, the language and culture  dies away, deformed, baroque, cynical, as third age people are. In that sense the birth, growth and decadence of any species, go hand in hand with the birth growth and decadence of the language they ‘speak’. So happens with social organisms that we call civilizations, whose birth, growth and extinction is closely related to the parallel process of birth, growth and extinction of their laws, religions, artistic forms, and social beliefs – their culture.

 

The evolution of languages according to the law of 3 ages.

 

Languages are vital species like organisms are.

In that sense we can study their evolution and development, both in time, through the law of 3 ages (a young, simple, energetic age; a mature balanced age; and a third informative age of maximum complexity). Languages grow in complexity and become richer as time goes by, yet also they loose ‘energy’, which in terms of language means power capacity to control reality. So curiously as languages become richer in form, they become less powerful and loose their ‘capacity’ to control reality entering an age of ‘fiction’, of lesser importance.

For example, this happened in nature, where smelling languages reach enormous complexity finally in insects from an initial simple dual electric system of smells (rotten smells with positive ions, spicy smells with negative ions), to the thousand of smells and insect today can recognize. Yet precisely when smell became so rich in meaning, visual images dominated as language of information, and top predator insects (flying insects) trusted more eyes than smells.

In the human case we will study in great detail the same phenomena for verbal languages. They started as very simple, yet sacred words, to the point that when the pharaoh talked it was ‘law’, till today when verbal information has reached enormous literary complexity and yet it has become fictional in his third age, in which nobody cares for words and laws.

So happened with visual languages – visual arts – that were first sacred (to the point the cave paintings were considered to transport the soul of animals to the case, and old cultures were frightened by photographs thinking the should of the person was transferred to the photograph), and now have no importance. Today when art is baroque, eclectic and very complex nobody cares…

 

The evolution of languages according to the law of 3 ages.

 

In the same manner we can study in ‘space’ as we have done with other organisms, in our books, languages through the law of 3 creations, to show how languages evolve and diversify till shaping a full ‘organic system’, divided in sub-species of energy and information. For example words started with the simple sounds. Neanderthals only had at best two vowels, e, the energy vowel, and o, the information vowel (to the point energy has 2 es, and information 2 os). Then languages evolved according to the law of 3 creations, and we have a, e (energy vowels), i (balanced vowel) and o, u (information vowels). In other books we have observed that pattern. From a single symbol of subspecies, we move into 2, then 3, then 5 and finally 7 forms: 1-2-3-5-7 subspecies, give us the standard 7 vowels of most languages. 5 vowels are proper of the primitive languages (Basque, and Spanish, which is Latin talked by Basques, and Japanese, under influence of the ainos). We imagine even more primitive languages had 3 vowels till getting to the 2 vowels of the phonic Neanderthal system, and maybe a single ‘a’ sound, as those of children in the Homo Erectus.

 

Paleogenesis of languages and meanings.

 

Indeed, the study of paleogenesis, which is so useful in biology, (embryology recapitulates evolution) works also in linguistics. So children first say the most energetic sound A, then the most energetic consonant M, then they put them together to design the “Universal center of their life”, Ma, the mother, then they move to the next consonant L, and they combine it with the vowel, Ala, which in old languages such as Semite languages means God…

In this manner the child has created 3 basic families of sounds, the vowel sounds of maximum information, and the two types of consonants, spoken with closed lips (ms) and with open lips (l)…

Those 3 families shape a first 3-creative split, that will continue to create the basic 21 sounds of the man language, 7 vowels, seven open consonants, seven closed consonants.

Yet what seems more interesting to develop a paleogenetic theory of languages, is the fact that at the same time the human child speaks those vowels it uses them to refer to the fundamental concepts of the Universe around him. So in as much as the mother is the center of his life, he uses the first words to call her. Then as I have observed in many children, as they increase their perception of the Universe, and see a bigger reality, parallel to their evolution of new words (some develop the next consonant, p, and say pa, some develop the l and say la and ala), a new concept appears: ala, God, the total reality. the first basic concepts of children are thus concepts related to the highest arrows of vitality: social evolution, perception of the total reality, and in some cases basic energy food (wa, with the first informative sound u, is often heard, to refer to the basic energy form, water).  It is indeed clear that man is a conscious, rational being because he speaks, and development of the mind and the world language is biological, essential to the existence of man.

 

Generalization of the 3 ages to all languages: Youth: Subjectivity.

 

We can extend to other languages this simple examples of how the fundamental laws of Times, the fundamental particle of the Universe, apply not only to bodies (as we have done in our site vitaluniverse.com to explain all the shapes of the Universe) but also to brains, and language, which naturally grow, and take the species that grows with them to the summit of ecosystemic power, and then to its decadence, substituted by new languages and species. Only then the language becomes fictional as the species also becomes fictional somehow, in its third age close to extinction…

When a language is born, it does not perceive properly reality. It merely essays how to describe that reality. Then as the language becomes useful to individuals of a given species, those individuals ‘repeat genetically’ certain sentences of the language which are correct mirrors of reality. They are efficient sentences which explain basic cycles and events that species have to know about energy, information and social behavior.

That linguistic information passes from individual upon individual of a species, which improve the language, developing the different capacities of the language to explain energy, information, to communicate and help to evolve socially the species.

 

In this manner the language becomes a perfect accurate mirror of the subjective reality of the species.

So we can talk of a first age, of a young age of a language, when it is simple and hardly can explain reality with certain depth. Then the language matures and becomes classic, realistic, ‘truthful’ to the events of the Universe, always perceived from the subjective perspective of the species, in as much as the language has a biological function that makes the species the center of creation in any language.

So smells that are good for man are repulsive for certain animals. And shit which attracts flies, is repulsive to humans…

This also applies to more complex languages as we shall see.

 

Social nature: the soul of species.

To clarify that unlike an individual who goes through those ages within a single life, the language needs many generations to achieve that ‘classic stage’. Since the language is the genetics of the species, is the life of the species. So genetic, chemical languages in body-life, or memetic, verbal languages, in human life, develop as a temporal soul through many generations.

We talk here of any kind of language. All of them need many generations to become a harmonic mirror which helps the species to develop itself in harmony with the Universe. Genetic languages develop the forms of a carbolife species, in a manner that the species will adapt harmonically to live in a certain ecosystem. Verbal languages explain a society of humans, how those humans have to relate to each other, through an age of war and conflict till the society reaches an ethic or legal code that harmonizes the relationship of the individuals in the society. The eye of species probably evolved for eons till reaching the present classic perception that makes mammals to observe reality with minimal distortion. The metal-eyes of science were evolved from primitive telescopes to the present accurate cameras.

 

Maturity: Objectiveness.

 

There is in that sense a struggle in all languages, to balance the needed subjectivity of languages, to favor the species that speak them, and the objectivity needed to understand fully the Universe as it is, and avoid errors when acting upon that universe, guided by the language. It is good to think you are the center of the Universe, to fight for your survival and hunt and be aggressive. But if you are to egotistic, then you will fight a lion or make a robot and die, in front of a stronger species… So you have to balance subjective and objective knowledge through languages.

In this manner Languages and minds evolve towards truthness, towards an stage in which they reflect like a mirror does, with minimal aberration the universe outside it. To do so the language has to abandon the ‘Galilean paradox’, (every language thinks its species are the center of the Universe) and become objective with its judgment of reality. Then the language, will find its classic age.

 

Old age: Fiction.

 

And then? For a while the language will dominate reality, it will be the tool of power of the species. Yet at a certain time, another species, with another language will come and take over, and dominate the old language and the old species. The old species and language is limited by its absolute nature, the kind of mind it exists in, the kind of force it uses, the information it carries, the simultaneity it achieves… Those parameters of a language determine that the language cannot go further. So the new language and species starts to take over the territories of the old language and species, which dies away.

It is the third age of the language.

How that third age of a language affects the realism of the language, the truthness of the language, the way the language mirrors reality?

 

In the same manner it affects the old man, that feels himself a being of the past, a being dying away, a being unable to cope with the external world. The language enters into a third age. That third age means the language has to abandon not only the Galilean arrogance and subjectivity of the first age, but also the harmony with the Universe of the second age. Now the language is inferior to reality. Such is the brutal justice of the 3 ages of all species, bodies and languages, in the Universe. The existential curve of a species goes from a youth of optimism in which everything is possible, to a classic age of harmony with reality, in which we feel part of the total Universe, to a third age in which reality goes beyond us, dominated by other species and languages, and we feel inferior to reality. The third age brings a feeling of destruction, of death, of pessimism, of inferiority, and so happens to the language.

We call that third age of the language, the baroque age, or informative age. Normally the language denies as the old man the fact of his inferiority. He overreacts and strives to show his value. The species who talk the language fight for survival. They destroy all what is new, they hate all what is new. Think of an old man, how he pretends to be superior, and still in charge, how he never acknowledges his errors, how he shouts and orders more than he can. So happens to a language in his third age. It becomes cynical, baroque, informatively, eclectic, it multiplies its statements, it shouts its forms. We will see how the different languages of mankind, and the different arts that expressed those languages, become baroque, cynical, eclectic, and multiply its forms, as an old man multiplies its wrinkles when the civilization in which the art is done, is about to die, when the culture decays.

Yet suddenly the new species and language takes over. The old man, the old culture, the old language, the old species, the old civilization is dying. It is no longer in charge. The tragedy has consummated.  What the language does?

It merely abandons reality. It abandons truth. As the old man who becomes a child, who denies death, who becomes playful, who loves fiction, myths and tales, the language enters in the last stage of decomposition: the age of fiction, the age of falsity, the age of myths, the age of distortion. The mirror no longer works. Extinction is painful. So the species and the language denies it. It looks back to the past, it looks within itself into the realm of imagination.

 

Fiction: Why human languages lost their capacity to reflect truthness

 

 All this is fundamental to understand the problem of fiction, a characteristic of human languages in the last centuries. We will consider that problem in detail when analyzing the death of human languages. In essence languages are not fictional languages. Languages are images, resumes of reality. They try to simplify that reality into meaningful information. So they try to expel from themselves, any fiction, any wrong translation of reality into false statements. It is important to understand the biological function of languages, to see this. While languages are not truthness in itself, they try to reflect truthness as the image-language reflects it in a mirror. What is an aberration, is to use a language to invent a false reality, to create fiction. So we find that most languages are dead serious about themselves. And ‘truth’, understood as the best way to use a language to represent reality, has been always important to any language, including the language of man. If we consider words, they have been used mainly in religion and laws, and technical literature, and to talk about what has happened to us.  Only very recently fiction has invaded verbal thought. So happens with images. Most painting has been figurative, and through the subjective truthness of an artist it has striven to reflect part of reality. Only recently the artist has purposely searched for a total deformation and fictional portrait of reality. Why is that? We advance now the answer that will be reasoned in detail in the last chapters: because mankind no longer uses his languages to carry relevant information. But instead it has been mind-washed by digital languages. So when money pays actions and obliges people to do something (through prices, salaries and bribes) laws are irrelevant, and ethics and religion become submissive to money. In consequences verbal thought looses his survival, bio-logical meaning and escapes into fiction. Also when cameras learnt to see better than we do, when metal-eyes substituted human eyes, in the perception of truth, painters, escaped into the realm of imagination. We might say that languages and art became crazy as many common people felt, because as it happens with crazy people, reality no longer obeyed them, no longer cared for them. People demanded photographs no longer portraits, and people demanded money to obey, no longer ethic messages and laws carried behavior. So words became fiction and art became imaginative, as crazy people escape inside their minds and no longer obey social laws. So artists forgot collective styles and became individualists, and writers forgot to show the social behavior of many people (realist books) and moved inwards as metal-minds (TVs) erased their social role, into the analysis of madness, and the inner mind. This is not to blame artists, but to explain why art has become so irrelevant and so it has happened to literature. Put the blame on sciences and machines that are extinguishing the social role and relevance of art, that has become fiction as it is degraded and becoming obsolete.

 


3: Human languages, Truthness, information and fiction.

 

Truthness and  informative capacity

 

Languages are the main survival tool of the species that carry them. So happens in history where societies and cultures survive better when they carry a language with higher information. In that sense we have to distinguish two different concepts: truthness and information.

 

– Truthness in absolute terms does not exist. Since all perception is subjective, created from a relative point of view – the mind and languages that observe reality. So truthness only exists in the species in itself. The truthness of the Universe, is the Universe in itself. Your truth is you. Any language will be by force a simplification that resumes that truthness and bias it from the perspective of the species that speaks, and the nature of the language, will therefore be biased, subjective, never totally truth. Subjective truthness is natural to all languages when they are used properly, and they are focused in relevant subjects. Truthness is a relative statement, since all languages are images of ‘Universal events’. So the absolute truthness of the Universe is the fact that the Universe is made of linguistic species that communicate energy and information between their bodies and minds.

 

– Information is the detail we obtain on that truthness. And it is also related to survival. Since the more information it carries a language, the better will be the image the species has of reality, over which it will impose his actions. Those actions will be correct if the information is correct. And the species will survive. For example if your sense of smell is not correct, you can eat a poison and die.

 

Information is the parameter of survival languages.

So with those concepts in mind we can qualify languages by their capacity to carry information (since truthness is subjective and cannot be qualified), as better or worse languages in the game of survival. Take the most important comparison established in history, between verbal languages and visual languages. In as much as images have more information their languages (visual, mathematical language) have ended dominating our civilization.

An image has more information than a sentence. So visual languages, such as images or geometry are more efficient languages, that give higher chances of survival to those species who speak those languages. You see an image of an event in less than a second. You need a lot of time to describe that image with words, with the same accuracy.

This has caused the growth of mathematical languages and the substitution of verbal languages in our civilization.

 

Objectivity, measure of truthness.

However the ‘preying fact’, the fact that people who speak mathematics can manipulate reality better than with words, does not take away from words the truthness of the verbal languages.

Verbal thought can be as true, as mathematics.

What is then the appropriate measure of truthness?

The objectivity of a language. The capacity to describe the “Universal events” of the living Universe, between organisms, that share energy and information among them.

 

Selectivity of information: certain things matter.

This means that languages have to select relevant information, about what really matters in the Universe, which is the game of Vitality, existence, survival and extinction we have described in the first chapter. When a language is able to resume reality around those concepts and carries to the organism that perceives the language information on those basic subjects, the language is objective, and carries survival information, relativistic truthness.

Let us consider the consequences of that selectivity.

In our brief analysis of the properties of languages, we did not consider a fourth property of efficient languages, related to the fact that languages have to be fast, and reach many individuals:

Selectivity:  In order to carry meaningful information in a minimal quantity of time, reaching a maximum number of species, the information that languages carry have to be selective. Not all information is relevant. Information has to be meaningful for the species that hear the language, and it has to interest them. This means information has to be related to the Universal event described above, since species are interested in obtaining energy for their bodies, information for their minds, and avoiding other beings who can kill you and absorb your energy. That is why all languages speak about the energy and information transferred in the event, and the nature of the species that communicate in the event. If they are friendly or not. Languages are serious, they are essential for survival. They transfer relevant information in terms the species who speak the language understand, and care for. We do not care about energies we do not consume, neither about information we do not understand, or about top predators of a far away planet. This means that languages are specific for each species, and explain only the world closer to them.

 

 


4. The Galilean paradox. What is truth.

The previous concepts about languages – their relative truthness, subjectivity and capacity to become degraded into fiction, gives origin to a fundamental concept on the nature of reality, the Galilean paradox. The fact that all information is relative and has a center of coordinates, around which information builds up. This means each language is understood by only a few species with minds that decode languages, and carry information only about forms close to that center of reference of the brain that speaks the language. So not all species decode all languages, neither we get much information about far away stars.

Who cares? Languages are bio-logical tools, and knowing about Sirius brings no survival capacities to man, neither it does it to decode the dance of the bees.

This brings a secondary consequence to the way species behave: Species only see as real, things that subjectively matters to them. The rest is unreal or lacks ‘soul’, becomes an object.

Such selfishness and arrogance of species who believe to be the only intelligent species of reality, because they do not understand all languages and species is natural to the nature of languages.

We call it the Copernican or Galilean Paradox: “Every form of the Universe believers to be the center of the Universe, because it perceives that Universe from its relative center”. So the Earth seems the center of the Universe, because it creates a fixed gravitational center around itself. Man thinks he is the center of the Universe, because his eyes fixes light in his brain center, and sees things in relationship to his eye. So thinks a religion of words that makes of man the center of the Universe. The same happens with a scientist, slave of machines, that thinks only his machines and digital languages carry truthness (paradox of the scientific method, a dogmatic religion of sensorial machines and mathematics explained by the Galilean paradox).

Take the case of Galilee himself. He thought the Earth moved, and yet relativity proves that is both moving and fixed, as a relative center. Yet his machines told him it was moving, and so he did not even realized that the Earth’s movement was a paradox. Till Einstein scientists believed what Galilee and his machines said for 3 centuries… Now we know the movement of the Earth is a paradox…

Linguistic species also believe to be the center of the Universe, because as languages go away from ourselves, they perceive less, with less detail. So we think reality is only ourselves, and what surrounds us.

Thus there is always an error of perception in any language:

“A language is a relative perception of the Universe, biased to favor the perspective of the species that talks the language”.

 

Such biological definition of a language is in tune with our present knowledge of linguistics: species talk languages to inform themselves about the universe, and use that information to survive. So languages tend to make their speakers the center of the Universe.

We call that property, the “Galilean paradox’. Since our light perception makes the Earth a still center of the Universe when we know in fact that it turns around the Sun. Yet it is better for us to see it still, and see around us. So we use light, and focus it on our eye, in a still map of reality.

The Galilean paradox is a particular linguistic case of the selfishness of all point of view of the Universe:

“All forms of the Universe perceive=measure the Universe from a limited numbers of languages, and confuse reality with their perception.”

We confuse reality with the languages we measure reality.

Two examples: we say a truth is a linguistic sentence. We say: you are tall is a truth. You are tall is just a sentence that simplifies a truth: you, a tall person. You are the truth. The sentence is only a mirror, a simplification of the truth. So happens with a mathematical statement.

 

Real objective truthness requires multiple perceptive languages.

In reality the content of truth of a certain linguistic statement about a certain being of the Universe increases as more languages=mirrors are applied to that being. Relativity is synonymous of true knowledge: in reality we observe the Universe from multiple logic languages. Yet the total truth belongs only to the being in all its cycles of energy and information, that an external observer never will be able to scan totally without modifying them [Uncertainty principle].

The Universe has the truth about the Universe.

All other truths will be simplified, and centered from a certain point of perception, that deforms from that point, reality. That constant deformation of perception caused by the fact that languages exist in brains that occupy a place, a frames of reference is immanent to the nature of perception. The Earth seems still, because from the Earth it operates the Galilean paradox. The Earth fixes reality and measures it with light and gravitation, creating a false image of reality. Reality has the Earth as the center of the Universe only in your senses. Your perception cheats you. It makes you superior, it makes man to feel the center of the Universe. It also downplays the living nature of the Universe.

The Galilean Paradox will be applied latter to show how errors of selfish arrogance construct human history. Since humans deny perception to all other sentient forms of nature in order to use them as energy of man, even when that denial distorts truth.

Brains and languages, map our a distorted vision of reality. We call those distorted visions of reality “worlds’. Worlds are virtual truths, relative linguistic truths over the Universal truth, which cannot be communicated in its totality. Since only the Universe holds all the information about its self. Truths are relative statements, conditioned by the language in which they are expressed. This bring us to the final property that qualify languages: its truthness.

Most species tend to create subjective truths, truths that have their own point of view. We feel the best, the most intelligent, the most handsome species. This is not truth, but it helps us to survive, to have an ego, to exist, as relative perceptors from our point of view.

Subjectivity, selfishness and perception are parallel concepts, which however oppose often to objectivity, social evolution and truthness, and the survival skills that those parameters give to a species. Arrogance is indeed natural to species, yet it is also the main reason of their extinction. We will talk in this book of the arrogance of man which is so subjective that makes machines more powerful than himself , and yet does not even recognize that power. The explanation is the Galilean paradox. However there is a more intelligent path of survival, and evolution, a better way to use languages: truthness.

When you understand the Universe properly, then you can objectively with your language define each species, its role, and the way its energy and information affects you. You will avoid top predators, and hunt victims, you will socialize with parallel beings, and become a bigger system to defend yourself from the Universe.

All those attitudes which are positive to survival, are difficult to achieve when you are as man is today under the effect of the Galilean paradox. When you think you are the center of the Universe.

Problem is that a language is in fact an entire different Universe, a mirror of reality constructed by the individual with his mind. It is not an automatic mirror. It is not a fact of nature that you put a language in front of reality, and the language shows a perfect image, reflection of reality. You have to craft and develop the language to become an accurate mirror. If you put a lot of sand together you do not get a mirror. If you craft it, and check the image, and re-craft it, you will finally get a polished mirror. So happens with languages. This means that languages do need to evolve, and they evolve towards a realistic, objective vision of the Universe. Then languages say the truth, because in fact there is only at truth for each language.

Why? Very simple, because there is only a Universe. So a good mirror, image of the Universe, a good language, can only show an image of reality, as your toilet mirror does.

 

The Universe is only one. What any language of perception of the universe does, is to explain that single Universe with the ‘truth of the language’. So there will be always a perfect combination of syntax and semantics, that will reflect the Universe with the language. 2+2 =4 is a mathematical truth, because if you put 2 pears and 2 pears, you have 4 pears in reality. So the abstract concept of a number as a set of beings, makes 2+2=4 the only true mathematical reflection of the event of putting together 2 and 2 pears.

A language is a mirror of reality, that tries to explain the Universe with the language – a brief abstraction of the Universe.

Yet what is the Universe? A series of species and events that take place in space and time.
So languages of perception of the Universe will try to describe and perceive in space and time, the species and events of the Universe.

Man has two main languages of perception of such space-time reality. The visual language that perceives the spatial truth of the Universe. The verbal language that perceives the changes in time on that Universe. We might say our mind is specialized in spatial perception through images, and temporal perception through words, and verbs, which explain temporally what has happened.

It is then obvious that words as a mirror of temporal truths, and eyes as a mirror of spatial truths, are the two elements of the human mind. So a better=true mind will be a mind that is able to focus properly his visual and verbal language, in the perception of the spatial and temporal Universe.

Yet because that universe is a single Universe, our eyes and our words will reflect a single image of that Universe.

Of course if we have a defective eye, we will see badly the Universe. We can see it with less detail, we can see it without focus if we are myopic, we can see it without color if we have color-blindness…

Yet a fit human being will focus properly and see the same image in space. We will call that image of a computer, rabbit or carrot, the visual truth of the computer, rabbit or carrot. A single one from the perspective of the human eyes.

In the same manner when we describe with words an event that has happened in time, there is only a truth, that explains the facts as they are, as they happened in time.

This focused mirror of the temporal reality of facts, is the verbal truth. There is also only a verbal truth, though there might be many wrong truths, wrong verbal descriptions of reality.

What is the key to find such verbal or visual truths? Information.

 

Verbal truths are self-evident when we have enough information

 

Indeed, truths become intuitive when we have enough information. We only doubt of truths when we have not enough information about what we describe. When we see in black and white, we loose visual information, when we see in darkness we loose visual information, and finally we do not know what we see.

The same happens with words. If we do not have enough information about the events we describe in time, we might not know what we talk about, and create wrong truths.

Let us consider an example of this.

Hold a bottle in your hand. You see enough of it to know it is a bottle. You have enough information. However if you put down the light, and ask someone what you have on your hand, he will not know. He has not enough information. If you put dim light, and ask him what kind of bottle you hold, he might take the bottle of beer, for a bottle of wine. He has misleading information.

The advantage of sight is that normally our eyes have enough information and we have no ‘mirages’ about reality.

It is for that reason that people tend to believe more in spatial truths that in verbal truths. However there will always be only one truth, because there is only one universe.

The disadvantage of words is that since they talk about time things, things that have happened in the past and we no longer see, it is easier to have misleading information, or little information, and hence to believe in wrong verbal truths.

]In any case we have to conclude that since truth is possible in any language, and truths can only be asserted from a subjective point of view, a point of view of survival, given the main use of languages as survival tools of a certain species, verbal truths are from the human point of view the most important truths for mankind. Since verbal thought is our biological language, the language that made man the top predator of the Earth.

Indeed, both the genetic clock and the linguistic clock seems to coincide. It seems that the present Homo Sapiens is the first species that learnt to speak. The main difference between the previous species, the Neanderthal, and the Homo Sapiens is the language. The language is in man is as in other species the main cause of our survival. When men learnt to talk, they organized socially in groups thanks to the language. They hunted better, and they extinguished all other Homo species.

The forehead where verbal languages are created, is the only difference between the Homo Sapiens and the Neanderthal. Once more the rule that  better languages of perception are the fundamental cause of the survival of a certain species on Earth, works, now with man. History does not evolve human bodies, but human languages and technology. This is evident. Our species exists as such since perhaps 150.000 years ago without real changes of morphology. It was verbal knowledge, the virtual worlds and the memory of the word of man what made man evolve and control the Earth.

 

Information selects languages.

 

Yet, despite those facts, today as digital languages better spoken by computers and machines, control the survival of humanity [jobs, money]. Why is this? Because ultimately in the objective absolute universe, man is not alone, but it is fighting with other species, with machines and animetals, for the control of Earth. And those machines and animetals who use digital languages have imposed over human thought, verbal thought, our biological language and his canons of beauty and ethics.

Not because they were right, but because they carried more information. We should revise thoroughly our concepts of languages and knowledge to include the fundamental reason of such knowledge: the capacity to survive that ‘virtual images of the Universe’ provided by a certain language give to a species. Mathematical knowledge has provided that survival rights to machines, not to men, because machines spoke better the mathematical language…

The consequence has been the decadence of human languages… of verbal languages.

The death of the word, since the word is indeed a vital species, a mind species, the brain of mankind, and as such has a birth, a life and an age of extinction…

 

 


5: Birth, evolution and devolution of human languages.

 

In that sense the analysis of languages of mankind is crystal clear, once we are aware of the nature of languages, the human species, and the historic and economic ecosystem in which those languages accomplish their informative function. We have to consider 3 ages for all human languages, that will show different forms and functions for those languages. A first age of ‘energetic languages’ full of force and arrogance, when the language is invented by mankind and achieves its maximum power. An age of maturity when the language founds its balance between energetic arrogance and formal beauty, and becomes classic, controlling human societies in subtle ways and making our life better. And finally as history moves on, and economic ecosystems develop digital languages that substitute human languages, we talk of a third age of decadence in the language, the baroque age, when either the civilization that uses the language decays, or the nature human races – as we have done in the past 4 centuries – substitutes the language for a digital version that makes the language obsolete, and corrupts it.

 

Take the most well known use of a human verbal language to organize societies: the verbal religion. We find a first age of tribal religions, arrogant religions in which a certain tribe such as Assur or Judea becomes chosen of God, and builds a set of religions ideals that make of Assur the God of reality or Yvwh the supreme God and the Jewish people the chosen people. Then we evolve religiously and we find religions that accept all men, and make mankind God (Muslim and Christian religions). Finally as money becomes the new language of informative power, from the XVI century onwards we find either the disappearance and extinction of religious believers, or the corruption of those religions in what we call Go(l)d religions, (Calvinism, Protestant sects, Modern Catholicism and inner sects such as Opus Dei, Modern Judaism called also in our books Aaronism, or modern religions of economical-national power). Those are the 3 logic ages of religions as languages of social control that we studied in higher detail in our book “Bio-history’, from the perspective of civilizations, but we will also consider in this book from the perspective of languages.

 

A graphic analysis of the languages of man.

 

All this said we can do a simple analysis of the 3 ages of human languages, as humans evolved their informative capacity, and new languages substituted as top predators, previous languages, till provoking the final extinction of all human languages by digital languages.

We have described now the elements and parameters, the properties and ages of the universal and human languages of perception of space and time.

Now we will study the birth, evolution maturity and death of those human languages, and their remains, the ‘art’ of the human mind.

The superiority of man over other Earth’s species was caused by the evolution of our two mental languages, visual, spatial information and verbal, temporal information. So we will escape the previous smelling and skin languages of perception, that controlled the information of lower animals, but are highly irrelevant to the history of mankind.

Such visual=spatial and verbal=temporal evolution  of information in man gave birth to some basic human languages, of which finally mathematical languages imposed themselves over all other languages. We talk of a series of languages, arts and human subspecies that became dominant one after another, as each of those languages lost their top predator status. Then the language no longer was considered ‘sacred’, ‘truth’, ‘survival’, but became fiction, ‘decorative’, ‘profane’:

 

– Pictorial languages [Homo Pictus]. Or age of simple images, which catered to the light senses of the first men. It was a sacred language in the age of the Caves, when magicians painted animals and thought those images to be truth, and able to bring hunting to their tribes. Then as words became over powerful, pictorial languages became fiction, decorative…

 

– Music Languages [Homo Harmonicus] which cater to the feelings, body senses. We ignore the sacred age of Music. Yet probably took place very earlier, as it happened among Paleolithic tribes in Africa that used musical rituals to bring the spirits of ancestors and invoke Gods. Today is obviously a fictional language, that entertains, and even degrades the mental state of humans, specially children, connected to computerized music, dancing ‘acid house’ with drugs or dreaming of fantasy emotions with love songs – as vulgar as it might seem to affirm those topic truths of modern society.

 

Both earlier spatial-temporal (image-sound languages) evolved into:

Verbal languages [Homo Socialis] which cater to the feelings, and human senses, to the communication among men, and the social evolution of individuals into complex societies. They became sacred in the Neolithic. They allowed the organization of Human masses into complex social structures, social Gods and ideologies that increase the cohesion of a human mass, and hence the survival of a culture against the hostile Universe.

Now religious thought is in decadence, and words are mainly  fictional… as men no longer believe in words but in numbers and computers.

 

– Mathematical Languages in human support [Homo Scientificus]. The first age of language used human brains as support. It was mainly an age of geometry, which uses forms derived of the Pictorial, geometrical evolution of paintings into abstract symbols in ceramics. Again the first schools of mathematics in human support (Pythagoras, Chinese astronomers) believed in the magic connection of numbers with God. So did the first scientists of the modern age (Galilee) who affirmed the Universe was written in numbers.

 

Languages change support from human brains to machines.

Those two last languages of space-time in human support, were however further evolved when man discovered ‘metal-pieces’ and ‘metal-machines’ able to carry information, and started the evolution of the Carbo-Earth into the “metal-earth’, an ecosystem of machines in which man plays a secondary role.

 

– Pricing Languages [Metal-information associated to the Homo Economicus] Money, a cyclical bit of metal information in the form of coins, changed the values of mankind, substituting the values of human religions (the evolution of mankind, and the creation of human goods) for values proper of the new metal-species. So money denied the sacredness of man, and allowed the organization of Humans as workers=reproducers, and consumers=vitalizers of machines, through the linguistic equality: man=price(money)=object, that makes men and objects species of the same value. In other words, money enslaved man as an object with price, susceptible to be controlled for the purpose of making objects.

 

Scientific Languages [Machines]. Those objects of metal, machines, evolved from simple metal-bodies (boats, weapons, trains) into metal-minds able to think with numbers, and translate reality into images (digital cameras, computers). They represent the total decadence of all previous human languages, that have become fictional, and further on are started to be created by computers. So we have even computer music, that dominates our metal-ears=radios, and we have computerized images, that dominate our metal-eyes=TVs, and we have the first computers that talk, correct texts, spell, and translate verbal languages, even some write with software, ‘scripts’… Of course this means a further degeneration of our human languages, even at fictional level. So even within the degeneration that means the use of a language as fiction we find that fiction performed by computers is even more shallow and degrading of the human condition that the one artists did for money in the pre-computer age.

 

Let us now consider in detail the different species of human languages, and their 3 ages, as new subspecies with higher information substituted them and caused their decadence.

 

Graph: evolution of Human Languages

In the graph, the x coordinates show the lineal evolution in clock-time, while the Y coordinates show the informative evolution, or growth of informative capacity of each language. We see how from an age of sings, of men-like-apes we came into the earlier Homo Pictus, and his cave images. Then it came the age of the Homo Verbalis with his higher form, religions in which a relationship of power was established: God as the human society was on top -> then man was the supreme being -> then the action of men (verbs) was commanding reality -> And finally objects were submissive to reality. Man was the top predator of history, and society was the only organism that for the good of man controlled us, through laws, ethic texts, and realistic literature, that exemplified what individuals should do in society. That age however ended in the XVII century, when money took over, and company-others and science developed digital machines, and societies based in monetary laws (lobbyism and corrupted democracies). So the fictional novel appears, with Don Quixote, an account of the decadence of verbal ethics and we enter the age of mathematics, in which man are compared to objects through prices, wages, and salaries (man=price=product). The top predator language is money, the top predator species, is the machine, and the top predator organization is the company-mother that reproduces machines, enslaves men, and controls governments. With the arrival of chips, that speak mathematics, the extinction of previous obsolete languages, and symbiotic species is at sight. Even money has become a thought of those computers (e-money), and men no longer believe verbal scientists, but computer models of reality.

 

 

We can resume the human linguistic wave in 3 ages:

– The birth of man, or age of dramatic thought

– The maturity of man, or age of verbal, written thought.

– And the decadence of man, or age of fiction and mathematical thought.

 

The rest of the book will be dedicated to the study of those 3 ages.

 

Growth in dimensions of perception

 

In our book “Theory of Times” (vitaluniverse.net) we explained how dimensions of reality were created in the plane of spatial reality. In the plane of temporal reality, of informative languages, the same process explains the growth of languages in complexity and capacity to explain the dimensional Universe. Words in that sense have to be understood as the growth of a temporal dimension in the mind of man.

In each stage of life evolution, a new temporal or spatial dimension of perception has grown from skin senses (spatial sensations) to chemical, smelling animals (temporal sensation) to sight animals (spatial sensation) to words (temporal sensation) to geometry (spatial sensation) to algebra and algorithms (temporal sensations). In this manner from the simplest animals to the most complex robots, there has been a growth in linguistic evolution, that explains also the dominance of new species on this planet. We are now about to create with algorithms and software that final temporal perception in robots that will give them the dominant position in the planetary ecosystem.

 

Words added a new temporal, memetic dimension to man.

 

This is exactly what happened to man when verbal thought appeared, and gave humans a temporal extra-dimension over the spatial perception of animals and its chemical-genetic-temporal intelligence.

Now men had a faster temporal-genetic intelligence, the intelligence of memetics, of words, that learnt about the cycles of existence of Universal beings.

In “Theory of Times” we explained the ultimate principles of the Universe: the existence of temporal, cyclical inertia, that transformed all acts of perception in memorial, genetic material, translated by a language. Exactly that linguistic translation of reality, is what chemical genetics, allowed in the first simple animals. Yet only with man animals acquired a new genetic system of memory and adaptation to external environments. Which was much faster in its description and capacity to adapt the organism to the environment that chemical genetics were. In as much as words were electronic and transmitted through sounds, while genetics were chemical and transmitted through sexual reproduction, the enormous new speed of memetics, of words, gave to man an advantage that no animal could match, even when mutating at full speed.

It is that same advantage what we are now observing in computer minds, that are able to create with algorithms, accurate representations of reality with much more detail than words do, and with enormous capacity to adapt to new actions. As new software multiplies and allows machines to create temporal actions, as words did with man, we witness an acceleration in time, and evolution on this planet that forecasts our extinction within decades…

 

The evolution of dimensional languages in man and machines.

 

It is then clear that we should talk of two stages of evolution of languages, in the age of history, the evolution of verbal and visual languages in man, and its recent evolution in machines.

What were those stages of dimensional growth in the mind of man?

First verbal thought allowed to add to the visual direct experience of spatial perceptions, a ‘memory’ of those species, which were given names.

Names gave a temporal dimension to species, that now were part of groups qualified by names. And indeed children learn first to say names, such as those mentioned ma, pa, and ala… or wa (for water). Names gave more spatial meaning to beings, by qualifying them with ‘Universal names’, clonic names that included many spatial individuals into a single word.

 

We talk of the most primitive languages, as languages with names. Those names then were used to add a new dimension of reality, that of movement. In movement a form of space, is able to trace a cycle of time, and so it adds distance and dimensionality to its existence. Languages acquired that new dimensionality through the verbal experience. Verbs are names acting in time. Verbs added a temporal dimension of vital actions to names, which gave origin to verbal sentences. And the most complex modern languages, varied that verbal experience, expanding it from the simple present of primitive English, to the past and the future… Even the hypothetical future, that requires changes in the basic conditions of the ecosystem (subjunctive)

So verbal thought became a top predator language able to create memetics, the reproduction of memories about forms and cycles of existence, both in space and time.

 

Dimensional writing. Expansion of words to social organisms.

When writing appeared the same process of enlarging the spatial and temporal dimensions of perception occurred, now beyond the individual mind, into the collective mind of a social, historic organism. Writing could remember in time, events that have already happened… So human information expanded both in time and space.  And again when the press came, multiplying the message that expansion happened at industrial scale (see Chapter 12). In this manner words became the temporal mind of entire civilizations. What was written mattered, to the survival of societies to the point that religious wars were started with the opinion of press writers…

 

Evolution of human languages. Logic phases.

In the next graph, if we reduce ourselves to the human perception of mental languages, we can trace a scale of evolution of each of those languages according to the complexity of a few author’s work. Because cultures devolve in the age of digital science, the best works of human linguistic nature are not by all means in the XX century: needless to say the graphs do not coincide with lineal time. They are set in the ideal time of human progress in each language, according to parameters of complexity that grow the dimensions of perception of languages.

In that sense we can consider an easier classification of the fundamental parameter of power of a language (dimensional depth) using common words of literary nature:

– Null dimensionality: fiction without relationship to the main facts and characters of society; gender literature.

– Minimal dimensionality: individualistic analyses of reality based in total subjectivity of the language (young, infantile modes of literature)

We call them dramatic thought. It is also concerned with the description of the lower senses, that go from sexuality to feeding, from simple, selfish emotions to body cult.

– Medium dimensionality: realistic literature that describes the complex relationships between members of a society through ideal ‘canons’ called characters that represent the different cells-roles of the social organism: logic, realist novel, cathartic theater, symbolic literature.

– Absolute dimensionality: Verbal science that explains the nature of historic social organisms (anthropomorphic religions) or the Universe at large (eastern religions, Theory of Evolution).

 

So as words evolved we moved from dramatic-body perception, into logic individualistic perception, into social bio-logic perception of man as a cell of history (religion, philosophy). The great linguistic artists of mankind reflected those growing dimensions of thought through the mirror of their linguistic style.

 

Unfortunately the arrival of analogic pricing  [coins able to price all forms of existence with numbers, including human verbal thought] and the scientific method of perceiving reality through numbers and metal senses, started the devolution of human languages, both verbal and writing languages.

Money substituted them. It became ever more powerful, as it reproduced in greater numbers, adding to the valuation of human actions [now subject to a price-wage], all kind of beings, all kind of objects that could also be priced.

Money was a hypnotic substance [gold] that appealed the human eye, erasing our verbal mind…. Soon in the age of the press, all other languages became subservient to pricing that was now hyper-abundant and could value all things. Words became corrupted, and finally became marketing and fiction.

 

 

 

 

 

In the graph some individual examples of the different levels of quality and complexity of human languages.

The first language to appear were visual languages (see chapter 7) which went through a first age as top predator language of the Homo Pictus, who believed in images (magic age) to an age of realist depiction of individuals (sculpture, portrait) to a symbolic age of sacred art, that reached its height in the renaissance. Which we analyze in detail in chapter 10. Yet as machines evolved, the mathematical languages preyed over the image language that became devolved again to dramatic forms (expressionism), destroying the human figure (Picasso) and imitating mathematical thought (geometrical painting, industrial design). We study that final age of pictorial thought in our 4th part.

 

In words we moved from an age of individual, dramatic thought of limited truthness (capacity to reflect reality in all its complex levels of organization) and great subjectivism, during the Paleolithic -> See chapter 7), into an age of non-fiction thought and ‘verbal science’ in which words are able to explain the Universe of man (religious words, see chapter 8), or the total Universe (Eastern religions, see chapter 3). As digital languages substitute verbal languages, however we go back with few interruptions (Theory of Evolution) to an age of new dramatic, individualistic thought, the present Neo-paleolithic of Human baroque (see Part 4, of this book) in which individualism, dramatism and fiction dominate.

 

So finally digital thought controls all systems, through pricing, and mathematics, in scientific systems of knowledge… Yet computers are in those visual and mathematical languages better than men, and so today they have become the dominant top predator linguistic species of this planet, even if they have not yet acquired a robotic, living form (see chapter 14).

 

The present age of fiction: third age of human languages.

Look at the present world, when digital languages have taken over verbal languages, as the tool of power, that rules through science and money, through polling and digital images, reality. What the verbal masters of the past, the writers have become?

Fictional writers. You might be surprised. You might think that fiction existed always in verbal thought. This is not the fact. Verbal thought was the language top predator of reality. It was the language of MAN. MAN with Capital letters. SUPERMAN, the ruler of the Earth. In the Golden age of verbal thought, ethic prophets said the truthness of words. Words mattered. Ethics mattered. Words were the nervous system of humanity. Words were us. And we took us very seriously. We were Galilean. We thought we ruled the Universe. We were God. God, the word came to live among mankind, said Saint John. And it was truth. Words ruled the Earth, and what man said, it happened. The Pharaoh had a scribe to write. The Pharaoh had said it, I have written it, it shall happen. Legal codes were obeyed. Laws created reality. Fiction did not exist. When fiction appeared in the verbal language? It did so in those societies where money, a digital language took over laws, and verbal ethics as the ruler of society. Fiction appeared first with certain importance in Greece, the first society ruled by money, the society which had invented coins, and mathematics, as the language that ruled business, that bought reality, that organized war. The fiction dwindled as the Christian ethics took over again. And there was only a truth, the canon of ethics, of social love, that followed the laws of social evolution. For most of the ages of man, words were only one. Words were truth, because they carried the sacred information, needed to survive. So man believed words.

 

Digital languages have caused the fictional, third age of words.

Yet in the XVII century money and company-mothers reproducers of machines took over. Science as a language of mathematics took over. And verbal thought decayed. Fiction grew. The first novel, ‘Don Quixote’ was written. Many novels followed. As science and mathematics grew in power, fiction grew in importance. Then in the XX century, not even men became the masters of numbers, but machines became the masters. And our eyes became secondary to the eyes of machines, televisions and cameras. The chip came, and the chip controlled the workings of reality with digital numbers. So fiction as words died away became the absolute rule of verbal thought. Today all is fiction. Today words do not talk about reality. They become fiction, comedy, drama, genres, escapism, films, songs. They become submissive to the images of a film, to the music of a song, to the market, as propaganda that deforms truths, in order to sell machines. Metal-communicators lie systematically and present us a fantasy world, the “American dream’, that happens nowhere. Words are false. Laws are corrupted. Ethics do not exist. We are in the dying age of the verbal language. Yet man is the species of the Word. So as words die, man dies away. We are in the human baroque. We are in the dying age of man. Long life to the machine, that even man heralds today and welcomes as the top predator. Look at America, where the masters of words, the Supreme court has said that it is against the Human constitution, to count with human hands, the votes of their citizens. Even if machines have eliminated 40.000 votes and count them not, the supreme court, the just verbal men, have the cynicism, the falsity against the laws of their country, to affirm,  that only machines can count the will of man. That if machines fail they are right, but if men fail, they shall be punished.

The process of death of a language, that we will study in this book for all languages of men, as machines and numbers take over our lives and ecosystems, means that the language looses all the properties that made it an efficient tool of survival.

The language stops to control a mass of individuals by simultaneity. Today people are ruled by money, no longer by words…

The language stops to carry truthness, but becomes deformed, fiction, subjective. So happens today to verbal thought.

The language stops to order reality in a fast and efficient manner. Look at human laws, how they drag for ages in courts, how they are corrupted and interpreted according to the money of those who appeal the law.

The language stops to become selective. Everything works. Every thing is said with the language. All irrelevant noise, irrelevant information appears. Such is the nature of the baroque not only of verbal thought, but of all human languages. We are in the baroque age of all human arts, and senses of perception.

Finally the language looses capacity to inform, it becomes blurred. So nobody believes any longer in the language, as the information the language carries diminishes. Hear radio, TVs, films. What they say to you that is real information? They repeat once and again the same shallow news, with minimal truthness, and information.

All what made the language a classic tool of survival disappears.

This however does not mean a language has not the capacity to say the truth. All languages when they are in the classic age, say the truth, and are perfect mirrors of the Universe.

 

CHAPTER 6: WHAT IS ART? THE EVOLUTION OF THE MIND

 

1: Social evolution, The languages of the collective human mind. 

 

Social, linguistic evolution in man

 

Regardless of the chemical mechanisms that transform sensation into perception, it seems rather evident that perception is the process of absorbing relevant information about the space and time parameters of the Universe. Such process requires to take only a part of the total energy and information, available in the Universe. This is achieved using an intermediate ‘mirror’, called a language.

We are not interested so much in the chemical processes, that permit the human mind to exist,  [in the hardware of the mind] but in the software of the mind – our languages.

Languages are the template that the mind uses to perceive the universe of time and space, in a reduced yet still meaningful manner, to help the organism to move and interact with that Universe. The languages of the mind are the software of the brain. In an external universe that constantly selects its species information is needed to survive. The role of languages is to process constantly such spatial and temporal information. You need information to survive in a Universe. You need information to escape enemy species, to hunt energy species, and to find similar species to yourself,  communicate and gather in social herds, that are more efficient than individuals.

In this manner languages help individuals to survive. Social evolution is caused by languages of communication. When languages are as in the human case, very sophisticated, they allow such a wealth of information and communication among similar individuals, that trigger the evolution of ‘social organisms’. Those social organisms improve the capacity of the species to survive, because as a herd the species is stronger and bigger than individual species, which men hunt in group since the Paleolithic. In this manner humanity has progressed thanks to his verbal and visual languages. It has become socially organized, and it has dominated all other unorganized species on Earth.

For all those reasons we say that languages are the software element that dominates the brain, and the body of human beings.

It is not the chemical and genetic systems of mankind, but its visual and verbal processes of information what determines the power of man. So it is logic to think that languages determine, adapt and evolve the brain’s software.

 

Linguistic memories: learning.

 

How the brain adapts to the evolution of the languages is obvious today:

The brain through learning processes designs neuronal networks, making human minds to adopt certain ideas, certain ‘software connections’, certain linguistic Universes. Those neuronal structures are the genetic memories of languages.

You have memories and mental programs in your mind, based on languages and cultural knowledge. You have Religious programs, semantic and grammatical programs, sexual programs, all kind of software that makes you behave in one way or another, speak one or other language, that adapts you to the environment.  Those languages are essential to your survival in the ecosystems of history – in human societies. So cultural ideas suffer also a constant evolution, and selection, [to which the neuronal software adapts], as any other species of the Universe.

Languages do exist, do have a physical support as a brain’s software, able to evolve, and become selected, by their quality, and capacity to help the ‘speaker’ to survive.

We talk in fact of ‘two material supports of languages’: Internal neurons, and external, artistic remains.

For example, if you have a linguistic image of an ax, which is accurate and allows you to create an ax, you will increase your hunting capacities. You will survive in the Paleolithic ecosystem. So that software of your mind will survive, and become ‘stored’ as verbal and visual memories, as well as in real axes.

You will teach your son to make axes, transferring that ‘genetic verbal memory’, to him, both in neuronal networks and cultural remains. His neuronal networks will adopt forms that memorize that software… He will keep the ax you presented to him.

In this manner we can treat linguistic evolution, mental evolution like any other process of evolution in the Universe. As a selective, genetic process that improves constantly the capacity of the linguistic species to control its ecosystem. The chemical details are accessory. Indeed, in the same manner we learnt the laws of evolution of species, in the XIX C. well before we knew about the chemical mechanisms that store such evolution in genes, we can understand the evolution of the human mind throughout history, without the need of mechanical, rather irrelevant knowledge about the specific ‘neuronal networks’ that store a certain language and a certain cultural memory. It suffices us to know that languages are not ‘magic’, neither spiritual, but material, made of neuronal networks and that we can apply evolutionary laws to those networks and external remains, based on their efficiency as ‘universal shapes’, submitted to the external test of the ‘survival of the fittest’. The ‘spirituality’ of languages, is an error caused by their ‘lesser volume’, and their ‘faster capacity to mutate’, as a species, compared to other ‘genetic species’ such as chemical information. Verbal and visual information is far more dynamic, and that fact has traditionally made it ‘spiritual’, since we men ignored for very long their physical origin. Today, thanks to scientific research, and thanks to our parallel understanding of computer software, [the mind of machines], we are able to understand better the meaning of languages, as physical species.

So we can apply the concepts of physical evolution, and ‘the struggle between species’, not only to ‘bodies’ of living beings, but also to ‘brains’ and their mind-software.

The Universe selects bodies of energy but also minds of information. That process of selection is the very essence of the process that has taken place in nature, among different mammal species, favoring the human species; and  in History among different human cultures.

You can compare that selection, to the selection of software that takes place in the market place.

Software evolves and mutates, making obsolete old software. The hardware remains but its software is erased and changed, every new perfected generation. The robot or computer will then perform with the new software, and design different objects, depending on their software – if it has adobe photoshop, or corel draw. So happens to your mind.

The human brain does not change much. Yet his software constantly changes, and so it changes the actions the human being:

You will act differently depending on your mind software. Your acts will test and select that software which makes you perform better in the external Universe.

Other humans will repeat – will create genetic memories – of a new mind software only  if those ideas and tools are efficient to control the environment. In this manner linguistic acts and culture become selected as genetic memories that are transferred to other human beings through books, art remains, culture, education, and neuronal transcription, (from your mother’s brain in the last months of pregnancy.)

So genetic-cultural memories, suffer a constant process of selection in the natural ecosystem of mankind, the Earth’s ecosystem of History.

 


2: Art, the evolution of human languages.

 

Artistic remains: the genes of the mind

 

It is in that evolutionary and social context, where the importance of verbal and visual languages, acquires their full perspective. The evolution of verbal and visual ideas, is the key element, to improve the well being and survival chances of a human society. Who is in charge of that evolution of ideas?

A certain type of human beings, which have brains with higher capacity to process verbal and visual information. We call them artists, and define them as a special type of humans: “I think more with words, and see more with eyes, therefore I am a human artist”.

Artists are the evolutors of the human mind, and art is the external, genetic memories, of that neuronal evolution of languages.

The languages of the mind, verbal languages, visual languages, mathematical languages, evolve first as forms of art. Sooner or latter those forms become the tools, and weapons, ideas and social networks, the elements of power of a civilization. So art melts and helps power to establish the systems of power of the social organisms.

Indeed, artists have shaped our environment, cities, customs and behaviors. Artists have designed the first forms in metal that became weapons and destroyed entire civilizations and animal species. Artist designed the coins that became money and created the most powerful language of power today.

Artists evolve languages, and humans use languages to create tools and organize society to control   the Earth.

This book studies those languages of the mind, their creation by artists, and the selective processes of those languages and ideas caused by History and evolution.

 

Individual art, and collective art: the mind of civilizations

Since all arts belong either to the realm of images [painting, sculpture, architecture], or sounds [music, literature], or combine both sensorial elements [theater, film], it is obvious that art is basically a product of the software of the space-time brain…

In that context is easy to analyze art, as the ‘external evolution of the human mind’. As such art, goes beyond the biological constrictions of the human brain, and thanks to the dynamic capacity to mutate that the linguistic mind has, art can create new images, and new forms in verbal and visual languages. Those new ways to describe the spatial rules of the universe [aesthetics] , and its temporal laws [behavioral ethics] help humans to survive, and organize themselves in social herds.

So we can define the individual style of art as the evolution of the mind of the artist, and the collective styles of art, as the evolution of the collective mind of civilizations…

We will analyze in our book how art through history has evolved that human perception of the Universe, not only at individual level, but also at collective level. Since collective art as the mind of social organisms becomes the fundamental brain-element to understand those processes of survival and extinction of civilizations…

 

The social function of the artistic word.

In that context it is much more easier to understand the meaning of verbal art. Verbal thought, is the mind of civilizations, the collective subconscious. As such it has the same function than the nervous system of a body has: to gather all cells together, and harmonize the fight for existence, for energy and information, that each cell needs to survive.

In a society, humans also require a system of communication of social orders, that should allow the society to survive as an organism.

We talk of harmonic social organisms, when the verbal system, of religious ethics work in such a manner as to make the society just. That is, a society where all cells receive energy and information and survive together.

It is for that reason that the Ethic Law has been considered a sacred way of thought, and most religions [Islam, Christianism] consider the words of the prophet, the true pace to construct the Wor[l]d of the society. All those religions and ideological systems of power, have considered traditionally the word, as the nervous system that creates harmony in a society and allows the society to survive…

 

The quality of verbal art

 

We already explained why words such as bad=extinctive, and good=survival, are scientific:  In biology we say that weapons “extinguish” or wipe out humanity. In the old jargon of religions we say that weapons are bad. Both sentences mean the same. They carry the same scientific information. Both are valid scientifically speaking.

Thus, in the same manner there is truth and lie in any statement about biological evolution, there is good and bad, which says the truth or lies about the social nature of mankind, and the correct behavior of men, within the organism of history.

As a consequence of the biological nature of languages, we cannot regard any longer verbal art, as a product, or a secondary commodity. “Literature for the sake of aesthetics; art for the sake of art” is far less relevant than ‘sacred art’, literature with an educational mission, either social literature and philosophy, or sensorial literature [fiction], which educates the senses and feelings of the people. There are qualities in the forms of literature, because literature has a function. Literature is not useless entertainment. Verbal Art is the biological language of mankind, and our societies. Its function is to mirror reality and explain the universe to man, from our own point of view, with the aim of helping human societies to survive.

This means that we can qualify the quality of literature, according to such function.

It will be good literature, either legal, religious, fiction or logic literary art, a verbal construction that through its reading and practice, improves the capacity of an individual to behave ethically and in harmony with the other members of his society.

It will be bad art, those literary and verbal forms that harm the harmony of societies.

So “War and Peace’ is good art. So it is the ‘bill of rights’ or the “Gospel’. They try to give the reader an ‘ethic sense of life’ that favors peace over war; human rights over the rights of machines; and love and poverty, and despise for money and war, [the message of the gospel]. Since history proves that those attitudes are positive for the survival of the individuals of society.

On the other hand bad verbal art, is that art, which harms the energy and information of civilizations, pushing individuals against each other.

A typical script made in Hollywood that makes an apology of violence and murder  is bad verbal art, regardless of its technological achievements. Its consequence is to multiply the use of weapons in our society, of technological species, that harm mankind.

The decalogue scripts of Polish director K. Kieslowski, are master pieces of filmed literature, despite their minimal technology because they make us reflect on the basic matters of love and life and death, far more important than the designed special effects of digital computers.

A fascist law is also bad art. A religion which does not accept the equality of all men, a tribal religion of ‘chosen of god’, is also bad ethic verbal art. Since it allows war between tribes. Those facts are self-evident to any human being that thinks naturally about the purpose of art and verbal thought. They might collide with the ‘economic view’, that favors all forms of literature, specially those forms of literature, that multiply the use of machines, even weapons [economic and military nationalism, advertising, etc.]…  according to the old lemma ‘you will defend me with your sword, and I will defend you with my word”.

Such art is considered here ‘rhetoric art’, bad literature, since its purpose is the opposite to the biological function of verbal thought.

However in present societies most verbal art is rhetoric art, art that has neither a moral, ethic standing, or even any relationship with the reality of man as an individual or member of a human society. Why is that?

Because words are no longer the language of information and power of our societies, a role that today belongs to money.

As a consequence, verbal thought is no longer the language of power, the sacred language, and it has no longer the role of guiding the survival of mankind. For that reason words enter in decadence, and loose ‘logic, realistic power’, becoming ‘fiction’, a language used to describe false realities. The value of things now is given by its price, not by its verbal meaning. So mathematics describes reality, while words are used to describe ‘fictions, and those realities of lesser power, such as the individual lives – no longer the social lives of people… Literature is now too often fiction, or science, or shallow I-literature, ego-trips and bio-pics of little relevance, or books on secondary senses and products [from gastronomy, to do-it-yourself manuals]. Sacred literature has almost died away…

 

 

 


3. Market product Versus sacred art.

 

Today the concept of art has expanded well beyond the classic meaning of art in history, which will be the concept used in this book.

This extension of the concept of art has happened mainly because today art works are basically products on sale, and so they have acquired values and definitions proper of the economic world, very different from the spiritual definitions that were used to describe art, when it was not considered a market-product, but the fundamental form of knowledge of mankind. Hence a ‘sacred’ endeavor. Since knowledge was considered to be the highest quality of man, the quality which connected us with ‘God’ and his laws of universal creation [either a personal being, as in most western religions, or an impersonal principle as in science and Eastern philosophies].

 

The human mind, the Universe, the World and the world of artists

This second definition is what interests us here: Art is a form of knowledge because it is related to the more complex senses of the human mind. If we define the human mind as a dual system of perception based on the senses of sight and sound perception, we could sum up  our mental essence in a single sentence:

“I think words and I see images therefore I am a human mind”.

A work of artistic knowledge  could then be defined as a form of sound perception [literary art, music] or visual perception [architecture, sculpture, painting], translated from the mind into an external medium. However since the process of creation of words and images by the human mind is constant, art was considered to be only those acts of mental perception that ‘evolved’ the human m