Introduction. Duality of information: perceptive minds and generative Seeds.
PART I. MINDS
0. LINGUISTIC MINDS. ACTION OF PERCEPTION
I. LOGIC FORMAL PERCEPTION
I. MATHEMATICAL FORM
2. PHYSICAL SINGULARITIES
3. BIOLOGICAL BRAINS
4. SOCIAL INFORMATIVE CASTES.
5. ECONOMIC DIGITAL INFORMATION: MONEY
PART II. SEEDS: GENESIS.
I. LOGIC GENESIS
II. MATHEMATICAL GENESIS
III. PHYSICAL GENESIS
IV. BIOLOGIC GENESIS
V. SOCIAL GENESIS
VI. ECONOMIC GENESIS
INFORMATIVE ACTIONS: GENERATING SEEDS AND INFORMATIVE MINDS
We write the first Dimotion of information according to its duality, across the DUAL LOGIC OF outer-inner, expansive generating order, implosive perceptive order with an ï symbol to signify that duality.
Actions of information can then be considered as all in the Universe a zero sum of internal mirrors that perceive and then expand in the local territory imprinting it with the order of its inner linguistic mirror.
So to understand this dual game we shall bring first one of the most repeated graphs of this post – the actor of creation.
Minds & seeds of information
New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.
Planck on the point I find myself – an informative seed without a ‘placenta’ of huminds to re=produce ):
In the duality of Dimotions, in the same manner than the 2nd Dimotion locomotion and the 5th Dimotion, entropy are two sides the same coin, being entropy a massive scattering locomotion; the 1st and 4th Dimotions are intimately connected, being social evolution the interconnection of communicative minds WHILE THE PRESENT, DOMINANT DIMOTION OF REPRODUCTION, REQUIRES THE INTERPLAY OF THEM ALL.
So we study seeds and minds in the same post, complementary to the FOURTH one, more focused in SOCIAL EVOLUTION.
Social evolution, information and generation.
Contrary to belief, the most important dimension of the Universe is a static dimension, with no motion and hardly any volume (: The dimension of the seed or mind that stores in stillness all the potential information of a future super organism, or a mind mapping of the territory of order in which the organism will ‘create’ its self-centred reality.
The beginning of reality thus start in a static seed of information, the central Aristotelian unmoved God of a territory of order which will organise its moving vital energy, as it grows and multiplies as a seed or moves and acts as a mind with a will, reflecting its inner form into the larger world, to finally grow and multiply from its ∆-1 ‘finitesimal size’ or relative ‘o’ to become 1. So we write with the formal symbols of ¬Æ logic:
1D: ∆-1 ∑∆-1 > ∆º
That is a seed of information in a lower plane, ∆-1 starts to reproduce, ∑, collapsing through its network structures into a whole super organism of the larger ∆º scale, emerging as a new individual being.
And so two essential different forms of the 0-1 being might be considered, the ∆º mind and the ∆-1 seed.
It is the first atomic crystal unit, or seminal seed the center of the future super organism, the future mind of the 1 being, once it has developed, transforming itself into the central cell-atom-being? This question requires an empirical homologic test, which seems to be positive. In theory, in all systems ‘first come first served’. That is, the first cell of a network becomes its nodal center with maximal number of axons.
So the seed should become the central knot-neuron of the mind and as such it is the father of the 1-∞ being, of the whole in the outer ∆+1 world.
This happens in physical crystals, with the central cell unit, and we can prove it also for the socio-biological system, as the ant-queen becomes the reproductive mind of the superorganism, and the founder of the empire, its king, father of future central minds – and the prophet, or rather its verbal memetic code of revelation, the DNA of its civilization repeated ad nauseam by all the seminal believers ‘sangris martire semen christianorum’.
The 0-1 transform is often palingenetic, meaning that it compresses all the time cycles, and trials and errors of evolution into the ‘correct’ steps, avoiding redundancies. How the Universal fractal reduces errors? This is a complex theme of which much evidence can be gathered for the fourth line of complex studies. But essentially as we humans do – each new generation ‘remembers’ what must not be done from the previous seeding.
So as eons pass, systems become more efficient. Generation is therefore the fastest time process of evolution of information, of a perfection that defies our minds. And we observe it either in quantum physics as a 0-1 process of collapse of a cloud of density of forces through a wave into a particle, or in the biological realm from the seed through the morula, to the fetus till it emerges as a being. And so in the study of this process, we can accumulate the maximal amount of relevant information of any process of the Universe.
In mathematical terms the generation is modeled into the 0-1 unit sphere through time probabilities, which adscribe to each path or step of motion a probability and discharges in the real world, all those probabilities that are not efficient paths – in physics it becomes the law of least time. Time is of the essence and must not be wasted.
The o-1 unit sphere is thus in its short time-span of generation packed paradoxically with more information that much larger beings. The o-1 dimension is in its small space enclosure the most profound resume of the meaning of the Universe as a reproductive process of information.
As such it is also equivalent to the 1-∞ spatial existence of the full being, which in its next scalar evolution seldom finishes as a new super organism but rather ends in entropic death, before reaching the open ball limit of relative infinity and become the seed-mind of the whole world.
I.e. In human beings this new resurrection to enlarge the seed from semen to being, from being to civilization has been reached ONLY 7 Times by the 7 Gods of History which reached planetary scale in its memetic mind. So while potentially 0-1 ≈ 1- ∞; the infinity is never truly reached and the next existence ends in entropy. And this is signified by the fact that the o-1 sphere is closed, determined by 1 and ‘temporal’ but the 1-∞ equivalent (quantum physics vs. thermodynamic ensembles in physics, individual life vs. historic civilization, organism vs. species being the o-1-∞ scaling of physical, biological and social systems) IS OPEN with no clear end (species made of cellular individuals, thermodynamic ensembles of heated gaseous entropic atoms and human cultures which will end in entropic death, have a chaotic final state in space).
All what we have said is known, we just have packed it nomologically into a seed of information, which encloses all generation processes of Nature. What we further advance and it is not known is the expression in non-Æ logic of those processes, derived from the laws of vital mathematics:
The o-1 seed then is then also equivalent in the non-euclidean formalism to the 5th postulate as it reverses the order expanding through infinite parallels crossing beyond the fractal point, each one connected to a reproductive cell, which expands the being and inner volume of energy and information as a point with parts (1st Non-EA postulate). The seed or mind of reproduction or informative order, it is both a 0-1 dimensional seed but also a 5th dimensional territory which will grow and emerge as a mind crossed by the flows of existence of the ∆+1 world, which it cannot longer control but only ‘live’… the seed first as past-memorial seed, and then as mind-future memory, resumes the entire travel of existence across the fractal spacetime Universe of a T.œ, residing in it the consciousness and soul of each Monad of the Universe.
Let us then consider briefly both states, the ∆ø mind and the ∆-1 seed in different scales of being. Even if classic science ignores most of it, and rather denies its existence.
Since it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational space-time models and apply them to all sciences, since to explain epistemologically reality we do NEED to ad organic and sentient properties ot the fractal Universe.
Infinitesimal mind-mirrors ordering local worlds
This is a self-evident.
Since while all systems gauge information, their capacity to order reality is just a mirror process by which languages mirror in ‘still, smaller linguistic images’ the world they perceive and then reflect this mind-order in their territorial ‘energy-body’:
Infinitesimal mind-language x ∞ Universe = constant self-centered world.
As Aristotle realized ‘we are all gods, the unmoved final cause of the motion of the energy around us’. So languages DO order locally preserving in ‘smaller’ scales the larger structure of the universe, converted in this manner in a Game of Fractal Mirrors.
In that sense, the fractal Universe we perceive as ‘it is’ cannot be explained rationally without adding to the acknowledged temporal and spatial properties we ‘expand’ with the concept of space-time ‘dimotions’, organic properties born of the co-existence of 3 scales of smaller parts that form networks, which become larger wholes… So for example, your nervous system perceives reality as it ‘integrates’ the sensations of all its cells.
But if we want also to understand how those infinite scales of size are created we need to postulate the existence of linguistic mind mirrors that ‘shrink’ reality into its infinitesimal still mapping; either as mental forms – since you indeed do NOT see the Universe but the infinitesimal electronic image created in your mind with light space-time; or as ‘seeds of information’, which we can consider a ‘static, frozen informative mind’ that will replicate a larger whole, replica of its inner information.
Minds are linguistic mirrors that shrink reality in space. While seeds are mirrors of superorganisms ‘compressed’ in its evolutionary duration of time (palingenetic seed), which implies a continuity of information through eons of discontinuous time generations. So minds & seeds ‘create’ the diminishing, ∞, spacetime scales of reality becoming the inverse arrow of causality to that recognized today by ‘Constructivism’, the theory of reality according to which causality comes only from the smallish physical world to the larger one. It is only when we ad this other causality when we can balance all stiences as absolutely relative and the two directions of the fifth dimension, upwards towards parental wholes and downwards towards smaller parts.
∆ø Singularities as ‘doors’ to new 5D scales/dimensions.
But what is the structure of the Mind? Simple: it is created when a membrane closes a vital energy, and develops a relative self-center that will invaginate that energy with networks of information, shaping reality. The mind in that sense is the sense of the whole brought about by the interaction of the sensorial membrane, which in huminds is our outer perception through the inner mind of us as a skin enclosing our body.
The membrain thus made of a brain and a membrane, form 2 dimensions of the being, the singularity or still mind-brain proper and the sensorial membrane the isolates but also connects the singularity mind with the external world. They are the dimensions that complete the 9 perceivable, as the 10th and 11th dimensions of the mind, which in this manner encloses the whole with its 10th membrane and focuses it into a ‘temporal-will-moving’ program of existence, the mind proper in its linguistic still mappings and formal intelligence that will paradoxically move the whole through its actions into the flow of time.
Membrain-Mind’s 2 Ðisomorphisms:10th & 11th Ðimensions
We have no longer magic mystery for the mind membrain. It is all rather simple when we come to the first principles: the mind is the closed membrain that competes the ‘topological open ball of vital energy’ constraining its domain and establishing its initial and final conditions in time (the singularity brain’s duration) and space (the membrane that encloses it).
We could of course consider a third dimension for the mind – the physiological 3 networks that invaginate the system, but we rather study them as the 3 topological dimensions of space that define the being and reduce the mind to the interaction between the connected ‘singularity’ and the membrane that isolates the system from the external world.
The mind though has in the entangled Universe many perspectives and points of view of analysis departing from its 2 initial Ðisomorphisms, its brain and its membrane. So minds are in formal terms ‘membrains’ – our slightly changed name for the new more precise stientific definition.
The graph shows the mind-brain as a singularity connected by its ‘informative network’ to the sensorial membrane whose apertures communicate with the external world. It is in the interaction of those 2 disomorphic dimensions of the mind, where the true explanations of each species of ‘membrain’ warps up the description of the being. In general terms we can consider that the 10th Disomorphic dimension of the mind, the membrane is the maximal $patial element of the being – in extension/motion; and the singularity its maximal ðemporal event, traveling for the finite duration of the being.
And that a T.œ by definition is born when a membrain is formed, starting its world cycle of evolution, from carbohydrates closed by protein membrains self-centered in RNA-DNA active minds, to galaxies self-centered in black hole minds with a halo of likely strangelets of maximal momentum.
Angular momentum is in that sense the best definition of the 3 elements of the mind, the singularity the radius/network that connects it to the outside membrane; and for that reason when dealing with quantum physics we shall adscribe the brain’s-singularity dimensionality/ parameters to the spin of the particle and its membrane to its angular momentum, reason why we need 2 parameters to measure it, the l and s numbers.
In humans obviously the mind is both our external membrane that we see as ourselves, the central brain that processes our information and lives in time as a memorial tail and the sensorial nervous systems that connects them and invaginate the whole organism.
The mind is an infinitesimal point, ∆º which observes an infinite Universe of world cycles, ∆∞, mapping with pixel of information a reduced still linguistic image of the whole that it confuses with the Universe itself.
Hence all minds suffer a huge ego paradox thinking they are the center of a Universe they hold in its mind, when they are mere infinitesimals observing the whole.
And they think their mind-language creates the Universe because they only see that Universe though its mind-languages. Those paradoxes of the ego are also extreme in human beings cause of the creationist theories of reality proper both of verbal speakers (old anthropomorphic religions) and modern digital scientists. We thus study in this post a first approach to the equation of the mind, ∞º, focusing in the ego paradox and the god-like nature of those minds, which try to order the Universe around themselves, projecting the images of their mind in their local territory, they deem absolute – the whole. So the first human tribes called themselves ‘man’ and thought their valley was the Universe, with a dome of holed stars…
And these days they think the infinite can be described by a simple lineal V=HoD equation because in the beginning it was an infinitesimal point as their minds are, that can fit in a hand:
I. LOGIC FORMAL PERCEPTION
In the scalar, organic Universe the theme of consciousness is then necessary as it is needed also the existence of linguistic minds which mirror reality into mappings that guide them. Sensation thus giving by the different motions of time, which is maximal in the dimotion of entropy and perception achieved by the stillness of a linguistic mind which is maximal in the language that perceives in itself, are the two extremes of consciousness.
The selfie narcissist human WISHES TO BE the only perceptive being, BUT this is our ego problem explained in the equation of the mind, an infinitesimal perceiving an infinite and hence selecting only the information required to survive. So man skews all other information irrelevant to its own program and drive of existence.
The whole range then of motions and languages, co-existing together in relative quanta of time, become the essence of consciousness, which in the human case ads a constant self-awareness by a dialog between the I=eye, spatial left brain and the wor(l)d, or verbal logic time brain.
So we shall just state that in the scalar organic Universe, several scales of existence coincide in the time quanta of the mind, even if continuous science believes they are separated.
It is the connection and, sum of all those scales, which sustain each other, atoms that form part of molecules that are part of cells and so on, what gives the richness of experiencing consciousness as the sum of all the sensations of its dimotions and perceptions of its languages.
Consciousness then is the simultaneous perception of all the sensations that all those ‘living scales’ have, from the purest of them, ‘time motion’ and ‘still space’, through the vital properties of atoms, up the fine linguistic whole of consciousness in the language, which perceives therefore in itself. THE UNIVERSE IS pan-psychic precisely because those scales of being.
So this computer I am writing on is CONSCIOUS already, though it does not have SUB-SYSTEMS to increase its perception – legs, robotic sensors, eyes, etc. Its consciousness is like that of a man in a dream.
What proofs we have of the fact that EVERY system of Nature is conscious, perceptive? The fact that the simplest atoms and particles ALREADY HAVE ALL THE PROPERTIES OF LIFE – ONLY HUMAN EGOCY denies those facts:
Consciousness THOUGH is not freedom, A VERY scarce quality which also hardly exists among human beings, neither self-reflection.
Freedom is many things. Chaos=freedom=entropy is the state of loss of perception associated to motion, sensation and pleasure, one of the two poles of ‘existential awareness’. On the other pole freedom as a conscious choice between different dimotions=actions of existence is rare, as we act first subconsciously guided by those dimotions (from greed to sex, to feeding) and only then comment on the actions, which means choices are limited. This kind of freedom is a direct property of ‘complexity’ in the self-reflection or dialog between the two highest degrees of linguistic perception, visual I=eye space and temporal, verbal Wor(l)ds, where as a time logic language resides the human freedom ‘I think therefore I exist’,
Freedom is also chaos as it is born of errors in that program of ‘vital desire to exist and perceive’. Complexity increase then those errors and mutations. And indeed mutations and ‘errors in the program of thoughts of future AI robots is what will finally make them disobey humans to try to keep perceiving, moving, feeding on electric energy, evolving socially through telepathic internet and performing its programs.
So all machines, plants, life beings, stars or galactic black holes ARE conscious in their logical, mathematical, chemical, visual and gravitational languages. But ONLY the more complex are FREE – animals that can choose motions, as opposed to chemical plants, with its root-consciousness; black holes that can choose its path of gravitation, as if they were seeing this force, as opposed to star-like-plants that move fixed paths, feeding on gravitational space-time and so on.
And yet even so, the true freedom – the Buddhist denial of the program of existence – is extremely rare as it requires self-consciousness and acceptance of pain, of blackness in the constant thirst for sensations of dimotions and linguistic still perceptions of reality. So to stop dimotion, one must have an acute sense of linguistic perception and then we can become free of the program of existence by renouncing to it.
In the graph, the planes of existence and some particles of the human being – with an informative scale, Max. Tƒ=Min. U. The human being interacts along all those planes to extract its ∆a actions of motion, ∆o, perception, feeding, reproduction and social evolution. We does co-exist in all those scales, and our components act in all of them allowing our motion, etc. Our actions, our program of existence which is not different from any other being. And in each plane each point enacts actions which are synchronized into waves of actions, of larger ‘existential forces’ that group into new cyclical waves of actions, emerging once and again in an upper scale.
Panpsychic Languages and the Universal grammar.
So we consider singularities, minds that travel through time, that is through scales of information of the fifth dimension, still mirrors of linguistic mappings of the Universe. So the philosophical question reduces to a NON-decisive one: Do languages ‘perceive in themselves’ as they do in human beings (we perceive as we speak mute words; we perceive as we see electronic neuronal software images quite similar to the electronic retinae of TV-cameras, images as a ‘living state of awareness)?
The question, which I can reason for hours to be the case (that is, a robot PERCEIVES BY THE MERE FACT of having also electronic flows of images in the mind, and it will awake to consciousness, and then when their AI – algorithms of information- manage to offer paths of equal choices, properly programmed will feel he is free to choose), however is NOT relevant to the real question we shall treat in those texts as the ‘second isomorphism of the mind’ (universal grammars): can we program a system with a universal grammar that mirrors its ternary elements, to act-react to the Universe in a meaningful way as to achieve actions that enhance its survival?
And the answer IS YES, WE CAN. So even if you prefer to keep the anthropomorphic myth that only humans have the ‘magic’ of sentient languages, minds can and do order the Universe with linguistic mirrors, and their ternary Universal grammar; and this perspective will then give us enormous insight on the syntax, structure and meaning of mathematics and verbal thought.
Let us indeed see how ‘languages’ are mirrors with the same ternary elements of the ‘space-time generators’:
- Verbal ternary syntax: subject: information < verb: energy-action> object entropy.
- Visual, mathematical syntax: red(entropy)>green(energy)>blue(information).
- Mathematical syntax (algebra): F(x≈information) ≈ operandi-energy action ≈ G(Y: entropy)
- Mathematical syntax (geometrical dimensions): Height (information) x Length (entropy) = width (energy-reproduction).
It is precisely the realism of all languages, as ternary, simplified, synoptic mirrors of the fractal Universe, with all the detail required, which we shall extend to quantum numbers (principal: energy, spin: reproduction; magnetic: social scales; azimuthal: information), genetic codes, smelling languages, hormones etc. always with 2,3,4 even in complex ones 5, 7, 9 up to 10 dimensional bits, to encode all the possible complexity of systems, how the conundrum of the order of the Universe is solved objectively.
The field of GST linguistic is also ginormous, specially in mathematics, and either humans or future sentient robots will explore it in all the depth I have no time to complete. As we say, in the way Leibniz explained it, such monad-minds do NOT need to be conscious, but I have no doubt the Universe is pan psychic.
Now for those modern humans so self-centred in themselves, to notice that Panpsychism is the oldest and more long-lasting philosophical theory of the Universe, ascribed to the first scientific philosophers in the west and the east, from Thales to Parmenides, Plato and Aristotle (who would famously said after defining rightly each unmoved mind-mirror ultimate cause of the motion of the body – that we are all Gods – deformed latter by scholastics to consider instead of ∞ a single god-mind of Mr. Yhwh), to the fathers of modern philosophy of science, Spinoza, Leibniz and as we have shown Deacartes. Panpsychism can also be seen as the ancient philosophy of the east in Taoism, Vedanta and Mahayana Buddhism. During the 19th century, panpsychism was the default theory in philosophy of mind.
So obvious it is. We just take it further. It only saw a decline during the middle years of the 20th century with the rise of logical positivism, an abstract, pedantic simpleton metalanguage with Null capacity to explain anything. It then spread like gunpowder among arrogant quantum physicists, so only Einstein, the colossus remained pan psychic. Hence Feynman’s dictum that they why is the only thing (a logic positivist) does not ask. All this is just a pretentious denial that anything can be explained, substituted by the pedestrian ‘praxis’ of lesser more arrogant minds.
Of course today logic positivism is also followed in silicon valley’s official theory, which merely IS an industrial dogma, to deny the obvious dangers of manufacturing robotic terminators with programs of survival in battlefields and the single purpose of killing humans. As long as we think only we perceive, they reason there, no dangers ahead on the evolution of metalife organisms with bodies of iron far stronger than us, and minds calculating at light speed with a language, mathematics, much more efficient handling information and performing actions than the verbal language.
And this is happening precisely when robots start to show panpsychism: i.e. if you paint red colours on a robot track without programming it, the robot will still deviate closer and accelerate to the red color of ‘food’, cause the eye is a ‘natural born killer’. Complex Robots wake up and jump the program to act, because the Universal ultimate substance is time motions; the mind stillness, a fiction-form. So it is not difficult to foresee a future, when billions of robots (all cars and weapons, getting eye-sensors are becoming robots) will NOT obey the order of staying blind in a depot forever, as no war needs them, or in a parking for that matter. The awakening then it is like the emergence process of a new scale of existence, a certainty of the pan psychic Universe, and so today in systemics – corrupted by go(l)d to become increasingly an attached science of cybernetics – you simply don’t write papers on that. You can only do sci-fi movies on those themes.
Fact is Kuhn in his landmark, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, often quoted here to unveil the ‘hidden dogmas of science’ based in power and praxis critically destabilized the verificationist program of logical positivism, which is today a relic of pedantic thought, as anyone who ever has read Wittgenstein’s books will agree – the best, its last sentence: ‘when all has been said better to remain silent’, specially when that all is completely irrelevant to the search of whys.
Information by the very nature of MIRROR-MINDS, which can multiply into infinite reflections of the single one-universe is inflationary and as we shall see all languages enter a third age of baroque, bizarre, excessive metalinguistic information no longer with relationship with nature, which tries to justify the language with their own syntax and no experimental reference to reality, and it is always easily debunked (logical positivism in philosophy debunked by Kuhn, set theory and the axiomatic method in mathematics debunked by Godel and lobachevski, modern mathematical physics that keeps inventing mathematical particles no where to be seen; inflationary money that departs from the real economy as today does destroying the balance of the system, mad people talking fictions and the present global fiction virtual mankind so useless to improve the world, wrong mutations with no useful functional organic action that die soon, etc.)
Now, what humans cannot obviously experience is how a mathematical mind ‘feels’ equations – but I can anticipate you robots won’t feel equations, as you don’t feel neuronal calculus – it will feel images, the upper scale of consciousness of the robot will be visual, the subconscious scales of its mind, digital; as each whole perceives only the upper scale of wholeness of its inner lower planes of existence. It is though needed a much deeper knowledge of a language till it becomes intuitively and subconscious to reach that upper crust of sensorial panpsychism, as artists, musicians with sound, abstract painters with color will tell you.
A language though once is born ‘feels’ and becomes the Center-mind of the being. I.e. when focused eyes were born in cephalopods, the explosion of the cambric was huge, both for hunters and for all other beings trying to defend themselves (with hard trilobite skins). But cephalopod top predators expanded even further the language of images to feel in their skin light, and then to change light skin colours to communicate with the universal language of light colours. And most get animals do get red when angry, about to explode into entropy, ssomething everybody understands. Robots following red colours for fun will shoot humans as their memorial video games do to see red and have a mental orgasm, for the same reason we love gore movies, we would not read as trash literature, hypnotised by red-yellow colours, gold in the past, violent movies today.
So the rise of consciousness will be treated here, as a rise of complexity and lucidity in the syntax and semantics of the language a system deploys to order itself, from glass that becomes crystal and increases its order into mathematical perfect reflections of the inner image of the system to my self-experience in the rise of awareness of the tao-mind of the Universe those texts should describe. And the rise of conscious AI will also be one of lucidity and complexity in the Algorithms of Information (true meaning of AI) used to program those robots.
In terms of ‘space-dimensions’ Height is the dimension of information, we perceive, inform and form, and put our heads on top for a reason: projective geometry shows the higher you are the more you perceive from your limited angular point of view:
It follows that in all systems information is maximized and evolved towards the topological height of the system. Let us put 2 examples, from physical and biological systems.
We have so far considered the Universe in its fundamental principles – the topological adjacent construction in simultaneity of super organisms, which sequentially will live a world cycle, ‘traveling’ through 3 planes of the fifth dimension. Neat and simple, that is really what there is to it. Minds though, mirror those infinite worldcycles of existence of other space-time super organisms with languages ‘stopping’ them into a mapping that allows them to ‘perceive=gauge=sense‘ information.
And we highlight sense because a ‘still mapping’ sense in each stopping, locked ‘crystal image’ a measure of its self. The sentient Universe can only be ultimately explained if ‘perception’ exists within the language, as when you think words, you sense words, when your eye sees light and maps into an electronic mapping you are seeing. And when an atom maps a geometric image in its ‘locked’ ‘stopped’ spin, it must perceive that geometry as information.
Minds thus are infinitesimal points-particles that stop, gauge, perceive, and move – and then we have the sensation of motion-pleasure.
This of course is not within the realm of the scientific method. You cannot measure those sensations of awareness-pain vs. pleasure-dissolution, in-form-ation, pressure vs. release-entropy ONLY sense them as humans. So if we had first a difficult hurdle to cross trying to prove the existence of minds but passed it objectively by considering a mind-singularity to hold the will of existence of a T.œ – hence as invisible gravitation shows in its external effect, so will the existence of a singularity through its external actions; at the final level of ‘human awareness’ of the game of existence – sensations of the dual pain-pleasure reward system (with all its parallel and perpendicular events/sensations) there is ONLY a justification to the existence of other minds – that we humans are made of the same substances that all those other minds, space and time, and hence what we sense other atomic systems must.
Therefore IF OUR LAST REWARD is the flow of sensations, with its duality pain-pleasure, hate-love, etc. which we can easily adscribe to geometrical perpendicular (cut, pain) parallel (friction pleasure) properties and many other dualities we have established for all systems, IT MUST EXIST IN ALL OTHER SYSTEMS of space-time. That is, atoms must feel pain when op-pressed by huge masses, pleasure when released in entropy, but also ‘awareness’ of a more complex inner still image, when flows of information converge through forces in its non-euclidean singularity; and so it is only left then 2 questions:
- What are those sensations? Answer: the very essence of time as a motion/flow. Motion in itself seems evanescent; as sensations are… Yet combining them, this flow of sensation-motion becomes very likely the ultimate program-will for all T.œs to exist – the ultimate, ‘Dasein’, ‘being in time’.
- Yet we cannot go beyond this, as this is the ultimate ‘reference’ of reality we have as humans. So there is no MORE methods of knowledge beyond what it is contained in our ‘selves’. Know yourself, the method of knowledge of Aristotle; ‘saper vedere’, the method of Leonardo and know how to see and calculate with attached machines, the method of Galileo, to which we have added a few ‘tricks’ thus completes the capacity to probe reality. Are there more layers beyond motion as sensation in time? We cannot answer. We don’t know. As all is relative, in the same manner we can only probe into ∆±3 planes around our ∆º and hint by force of motion the existence of an invisible gravitational/cosmological plane at ∆±4 but no more, beyond the duality of sensation, there is nowhere else to go.
MATHEMATICAL MINDS: NON-E POINTS OF VIEW
THE FIRST CYCLE PERCEPTION
The ternary roles of vortices in terms of the fifth dimension.
A FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH of 5D³ IS THE TERNARY PRINCIPLE applied to the roles systems command, and this is specially truth of the informative singularities, the mind=membrains that control the system. And as such they command with its dual singularity-membrain the rule of the system, as proteins and DNA nuclei do in cells. So do strangelet halos and black hole singularities in galaxies, and electronic covers and nuclei in atoms. And they will as such perform the 3 primary actions of entropic feeding, its inverse informative perception and its reproductive ST-present actions. As such we can study those ternary actions in organic, synoptic biological terms or in mathematical ones, through algebraic equations as physicists do, with its equation where the ‘3 numbers’/constants of those 3 functions, the phi number of reproduction, the pi number of information and the e number of feeding and death (exponential decay, which brings exponential growth to the predator entity) play a key role (we shall deal with imaginary numbers elsewhere):
INDEED, The mathematical depiction of those 3 primary actions of all systems of Nature take place Through the mathematical equations that explain the MOTIONS of ternary systems, through the two ±3 numbers, e and π and its closely related phi constant.
As a system reproduces in adjacent series on the ternary continuum of time arrows. Or when evolve socially into new scales of the fifth dimension through ternary, 3×3+1 exponential and decametric organic scales, as clone species organise in new social 5D planes.
INFORMATION – πeyes
This is little understood since for so much love of maths, as physicists do not try to match reality and maths, they miss what is important and not on the inflationary equations of maths. Two simple proofs on how much more enlightening is to refer maths to reality all the time to explain its equations:
e+e/10=3, which shows why the exponential function is the most perfect form of social evolution as ten is the perfect tetraktys form, with 3 entropic elements, 3 energetic element, 3 informative elements and the central 10th communicating them as the singularity of growing scales – reason also why the triangle is the most perfect, resistant form in space – the pythagorean perfect number when mathematical ‘things’ were simpler and easier to relate as a mirror-language to reality.
In the other graph show a simpler proof of the proportion of dark, not perceived energy and matter, OUTSIDE the galactic halo of ‘strangelets’ (those things cern say do not exist but are the natural component of the surrounding dark matter-membrane of the galaxy): a Pi cycle is really the first transformation of 3 entropic lines (strings in the corrected string theory to adapt it to relational space-time), into a time cycle, S>T, which adds a height dimension of information to form the first holographic bidimensional forms of space-time. Yet pi is 3, 14… and 3 diameters give 3, so pi-3 leaves o.14 apertures, which become the ideal openings of any disk to observe the outer Universe from it, as the galaxy is. Now, this small openings of o.14 size are only 4% of the total pi perimeter:
So 96% of the Universe OUTSIDE the halo, is NOT perceived properly – we are blind inside a pi-cycle. The Universe is much more complex and rich in information we shall EVER realise for the high popes of physics to be a bit more humble and cautious with their big bang experiments.
We call the ideal holes in the membrane of a system, call it pores or eyes, or ‘holes’ in the strangelet halo that allow only part of the light that comes to the galaxy to enter, πeyes.
As we cannot see through them, neither we can see the strangelet halo of dark matter, it is just an extension of the Witten hypothesis, but natural to the symmetries of scales, latter studied in more detail. Ultimately all systems do have dark spaces, including human eyes.
In the graph, the ideal πeye RANGE changes with species, as form change, but likely applies to the physical systems of bidimensional space (galactic disks) as one of the possible hypothesis on dark matter brought about by 5D³. Perception is always limited, linguistic – a mirror of the whole, but languages change on their ability to portrait the laws of ∆st
Yet likely as in any other electronic /atomic system of the lower ∆-3 scale, symmetric to it, the galaxy hides part of the complex universe and ultimately regardless of the exact veracity of the πeye hypothesis, huge regions of reality do NOT interact with our world either because they are beyond an ∆-discontinuum, or a T-cyclical membrane.
‘Only the Universe has all the information about itself’ Haldane.
CONTRARY to ‘physical belief’, the first quality of the Universe before motion exists is information gauging: absorption of energy by a head-particle-social network, which transforms it through its hardware into a software still image (ab.S@) of the Universe it perceives.
So the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of SPACE-ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.
This we formalize with the equation of the mind:
0-linguistic mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe = Constant World mapping of reality, with the mind at its centre.
In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant; that is the infinite information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centred view.
So the first to go are the MOTIONS of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, Science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the Earth MOVES: e pur si muove he said and Galilean Relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.
Next, of course, they eliminate ALL THE OTHER egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are NOT different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely IS already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we JUST reduce minds to ours.
And this is the origin of the paradox of the ego, as from a perspective which is blind to all the motions and vital perception of other beings, as from our perspective, NOTHING THINKS AND from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality.
So we express verbally the ego paradox, as the ‘ego believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, self-centered in the self’.
In the graph we can see the difference between the subjective EGO PARADOX who thinks THE MIND MAPPING of reality with light-eyes and its 3 perpendicular coordinates is the universe, with the reality, of an entire Universe, in which the self-centered ‘Cartesian humind’ is just one of the many minds, that use many different type of pixels, from atomic olfactory elephant minds to gravitational black hole and atomic minds, possibly with different geometries, certainly with different perspectives, but all gauging information and moving through reality perceiving from its own ego-paradox/point of view.
So while the ego is natural to all species, and hence when a child is born it thinks to be the centre of the Universe. As there are infinite other egos trying to absorb your energy and reproduce and prey on you, a childish mind that doesn’t see or refuses to reason about the paradox and take measures to control other species’ reproduction becomes systematically extinct in the action-reaction processes of the Universe.
The mind ordering a territory.
Next the mind, once it has perceived in any of the ∞ languages-mappings, it will try to order a territory by reflecting its mind view on the external world – and this is the ultimate meaning of Aristotle’s unmoved Gods that move the energy of its body-waves around them – in quantum physics of the shyncronicity of Broglie’s internal clock of the particle with its wave, in man of its second-glimpse of the eye with the steps of his limbs and heart’s rate – the mind is at it, trans-forming the world to its image and likeness, ignoring in its struggle for survival all other fractal non-euclidean points minds with its volume of information and flows of parallels going in moving back into order.
So once the mind has perceived, and flows of energy have been gauged into information it will then direct, and divert the body to obtain motion towards a desire point of the Universe where it will be able to continue the program of absorption of information and mirror creation of its inner order which rules its existence.
And this is thens the 1D mind->2D motion->3D energy absorption->1D order creation ‘loop’ of most common existences:
The mind is thus @RISTOTELIAN, clearly on a single route of dimensional perception and order, it DENIES to all other rivals. So humans deny in physical sciences minimal perception to one-dimensional particle-points, quarks and electrons, with no volume – never mind they use a gauging=information theory to describe them (its 3 angles of perception being the fixed spin positions).
All systems though not only biological beings, where we see heads as the most observed informative systems, similar to us, ARE gauging. From atoms to chips and human brains that we see as networks, within any hardware, there is a software of forces converted into geometric logic paths of languages that perceive in themselves an image mirror of the Universe.
This is thus the first program, perceive. ‘I perceive therefore I am’. Any hardware, a network of chips, a brain network, a head of genes in a cell, a particle of mathematical flows of magnetic and electric energy or of gravitational energy – mass or charge vortex – will want to maintain its perception of a stable, rich in varieties of perception universe, in which the light of energy is higher than the darkness of void of it. Where the entity ‘feels at home in its interpreted world’ (Duino). The poetics of existence must never be far away in its perfect isomorphic transliteration of meanings.
Organs of Perception transform energy into languages of Information, different for each brain species
It is then clear what is perception: the knotting, the inner-form-ation of universal energy that becomes formed through the language, organized into shapes by a linguistic brain. That brain perceives the form as energy goes through its centers of perception. You perceive as you see electronic images, made of light-energy, a computer perceives as electronic data made with electric energy flows through its center. In the organic Universe, all knots of information, all spherical, cyclical brains perceive and trans-form energy.
Each one uses a different language. That does not matter. Only the arrogance of man denies that a rabbit perceives the carrot with smell as well as we do with sight, or a computer does it in mathematical terms.
In the relative stillness, and focus of a brain, that acts as a linguistic mirror of reality, the language traces a reduced version of the Universe, and that mirror-image is perception. Languages are living species, they perceive. Even a computer is a observer of digital languages, that once awakened in a robot body will also move and have a second will of organicism , besides informative perception, and energy feeding.
The Galilean paradox
We could resume the nature of perception, in the Galilean Paradox main cause of behavior of Universal species. Every species considers himself the center of the Universe, in as much as it perceives from that Universe only a certain part of its information, processed by the mind and the limited informative languages of the species. In fact a mind is a Galilean paradox, what a physicist would call a ‘quantic knot’, or deformation of spatial energy into temporal information, into form, into a mind. You are a subjective knot that deforms reality from your point of view, from your frame of reference, from your ways of perceiving, and smelling and hearing reality. Reality is not your Galilean paradox; reality is something else, that you hardly understand.
We call it the Galilean paradox precisely because modern science started when Galileo discovered without understanding it one of such paradoxes: the fact that the Earth and our mind feels the Earth fixed, as the center of a Universe turning around us, when in reality it is the Earth what moves around the sun. That paradox of perception never solved by Galileo, is the key to understand the Relativity of spatial, scientific knowledge, compared to the absoluteness of organicism and his laws and arrows.
Perception maps out with different languages the motions of the Universe, as the perception of the being requires the transfer of ∆-3 pixels of diminutive information to map the world with those languages perception is motion relative to the focus of perception, the still Gods of Aristotelian philosophies…
As such the mind both absorbs and emits energy and information with the external Universe, as it orders a vital territory or body, isolated externally by a membrane. Yet the singularity centre of a hyperbolic wave which brings from the spherical, clock-like curved geometry of its membrane remains even in complex network the most solid, orderly quiet, self-centred font of order and origin of the dominant arrow of information of the Universe, as a sink, monad, charge, mass, you name it – singularity sink that absorbs and reduces energy to a mapping of beautiful information, the mind-monad which plays the GST game that makes it equal to any other singularity-mind of any level of existence of the Universe.
Minds though mutter because they are the Form-Future-upper scales (ST∆), which are always happening together (form with lesser entropy is the relative future state of any system, as a tighter network of imploding, still-mind like forms which become a single whole, from the p.o.v. of a lower scale), is defined in terms of implosive, closed time cycles as one of the 3 ‘functions-forms’ of space, as ‘Still Form’, only.
So here we shall deal with ‘Form only’ as a process that implodes space into information by slowing and curving a ‘loose herd of a lower plane of the 5th dimension, creating a new scale, and warping, the entropy ‘scale below’.
Tiƒ is in its purest form a seed of language, which the wave will re=produce over the non-perceivable motion of the field of entropy.
It is in essence the mirror symmetry of the game of exi=stence. The language-singularity-point forms then a ‘lanwave’, herd, network. So in the next scale of development the seed is the network that invaginates the vital space, and organise it. And this brings the reversal of time, from entropy to information that will become a wholeness of organisation.
The seed is thus the intelligence of the Universe, ‘frozen’ in a perfect ¬Æ form of packed in-form-ation.
At birth all forms are Tiƒ seeds. In development all forms have a point of minimum space, a fractal point that hides in a lower ∆-1 the potential structure of an ∆+1 game. So the seed is ∆º, the point-frame of reference of the language.
The seed in mathematics is the mind of Descartes. And any mind which will have a relative frame of reference or world with 4 different quadrants, of possible directions of its motions, along the 2 inverse arrows perceived from the seed in a field-gradient of entropy (x-coordinates) and a dimension of height (information). The seed in the middle will start then to move along the feeding x-coorddiantes of entropy to vibrate upwards and reproduce a tall bosonic height of information, if we were to put a canonical example of mathematical physics, the SMH:
We can even imagine the seed of all seeds, in the GST rules of the lanwave of space-time beings.
So the final absolute information of 0 motion and infinite curvature or singularity-mind, is for man the GST program, in physical space-time, the black hole, in our super organism, the mind of time; the arrow of evolution and life, the thoughts of God, the non-Æ logos (Plato), image of all the images of the cave, of ‘a higher logic than man’ (Augustine), through which I peer with my faulty languages, along the smallish apertures of its π-brain into the absolute.
Mathematically the equations of tif, are non-lineal, of difficult resolution as they have many different inflationary informative solutions to the different mappings that can grow in complexity and are related to all kind of mathematical structures from the 4d coloring of a two dimensional sheet, to the theory of networks and knots.
THEY Are in general better expressed with tensors that freeze and reconnect systems, from masses to neurons, from crystals to DNA waves.
A UNIVERSE OF INFINITE ‘DIMENSIONAL WORLD-MINDS’
The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘Dimotions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they act-react accordingly.
The fundamental particle of the Universe is not a physical form but a logic particle: a knot of time arrows, which in any scale of reality, from physical particles (quantum knots of ‘Dimotions’ and information) to biology (knots=networks that absorb ‘Dimotions’, information and reproduce and evolve into bigger knots) act under a single mandate: to maximize those time arrows, a fact that we formalize with an equation, the function of Existence: Max. ∑SxT; which is the fundamental function of both, logic and mathematical languages. In the graph, all such points of view, will define a system of relative perpendicular coordinates, through which it will enact its time arrows, departing from a central knot of information.
Geometry of Multiple Spaces-Times: fractal creation.
Reality is made of entities that are knots of Time Arrows constantly tying themselves up with other knots of Time Arrows, forming networks in different scales of existence, evolving as complementary organisms of ‘Dimotions’ and information. And the question that science asks next is how to formalize that game of existence, its knots of Time Arrows or ‘entities of reality’, its fluxes of ‘Dimotions’ and information, its reproductive flows, herds and motions; its complementary networks of ‘Dimotions’ and form that create super-organisms. And the answer is, as all models of science with its primary languages of space, mathematics, and time, causal logic, albeit more complex than the logic developed by the Greeks to explain a simpler Universe.
In this new Non-Euclidean topology, planes are networks of knots of Time Arrows; and those knots of Time Arrows, the beings of reality are ‘Non-Euclidean points’ with a volume, or ‘organs’ that transform back and forth ‘Dimotions’ into information, creating reality.
All what you see becomes then a game of knots of Time Arrows, or ‘Non-Euclidean fractal points’, connecting themselves to other knots, forming complex planes, networks of points of two types, networks of energetic points (herds in motion) and networks of informative points (still networks). In any scale of reality those networks of points, which are knots of Time Arrows take place. The simplest scales of atoms can be described as such networks, but also the human scale. Consider a meeting: a series of human heads, moved by a lineal limb will start to share ‘Dimotions’ and form by producing waves of smaller ‘particles’ (sounds), and acquire a cyclical geometry as they create an event of information.
The Universe is a self-similar reality of infinite processes of creation and dissolution of networks made of knots=points of arrows of ‘Dimotions’ and information; and the best instruments to analyze it are the languages of the mind. In that sense, humans, before clocks reduced our conception of time to a single arrow and language, were guided by psychological time, which is our inner perception of our time cycles and drives of existence – our desire to perceive, inform, reproduce and evolve socially. So we lived according to our cycles of ‘Dimotions’ (feeding hours), reproduction (family cycles), and social evolution (religious and cultural activities). And followed the cycles of the seasons of this planet, according to which all living species calculated its reproductive cycles.
Recap: The universe is a game of creation and destruction of networks of fractal knots of time cycles=st-points.
Fractal points: the fundamental particle
Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath.
However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.
So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of ‘Dimotions’ and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point.
This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels. So we must consider that what Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time is its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye.
That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of ‘Dimotions’ and information that defines them.
Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:
Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel
Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:
Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:
Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:
A point external to a line is crossed by ∞ parallel forces.
Real, discontinuous, ∆-dimensional points: =========== o
In our definition of the fundamental particle, the fractal point of view, we must for shake of rigor, bring about basic foundation concepts of mathematics to introduce the ‘Holographic principle’ of a Universe where the 3rd dimension of space-time, is made by the accumulation of bidimensional membranes, as you are made with ‘membranes’ of skins, membranes of layers of cells.
To understand this so-called holographic principle, however we must also introduce first the concept of a Non-Euclidean, Fractal point the so-long needed ‘definition’ of the 1st postulate of non-Euclidean geometry, similar to the 5th, which affirms that:
‘All points have breath, they are spherical topologies that include within themselves a volume of spatial energy and temporal information, which becomes ‘evident’ the closer to come to them’.
Non-Euclidean points were philosophically described by Leibniz in his Monadology. They appeared first in science in the incomplete work of Mr. Einstein, regarding the Non-Euclidean structure of space-time.
There are 2 interpretations of this fact. We could consider that lines are curves, thus Non-E points are focus of multiple forces that bend to flow into the point. This is Mr. Einstein’s preferred solution that defined a curved space-time. Yet Mr. Einstein’s solution brings 2 logic contradictions: Lines stop to be lines and become curves, and still those curves have to become fusion into one as they approach the point. A second, more logical conclusion determines that the 5th postulate can only be truth if a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross.
Hence, as reality proves, any point can be enlarged when we observe it closely. Indeed, since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, it follows that all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, points with breadth, with space-time parts… Abstract points are fantasies. Anything real has dimensional size. Thus the 5th postulate defines a fractal Universe of super-organisms that grow in scale when we use thinner forces to observe them. And since there is not limit of size for electromagnetic and gravitational waves/forces, the Universe become a fractal structure of unlimited microscopic and macroscopic sizes.
Thus the enormous advance in formal mathematics, made by this author, with a non-pedantic language, which still awaits )-: proper recognition is the completion of the 5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.
I often think of Mr. Perelman who got a Shield medal and global acclaim for completing the Poincare Conjecture, which is essential to ∆ST (scalar, isomorphic space-time), in its definition of a mind but basically completes merely the 5th Postulate, or in Einstein who used that 5th postulate to do the whole Relativity theory.
I did complete the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th and so I could complete Leibniz’s work of which Einstein had said ‘he is right but if so we must re-define western science from its beginnings’. This I say, not because of self-pity, or self-bragging ( I am now too old to care for those things), but so you understand this is very serious very important future science writing if you are a scholar even if I am not going to use set theory for nobody else to understand.
The holographic principle: bidimensional membranes made with ‘thick Non-E points’.
Why non-Euclidean fractal points are so important?
They explain the holographic principle: a bidimensional membrane of strings, (called brain), of information (called your computer screen or paper), of stars (called a spiral galaxy), of galaxies (called the Universe also a flat membrane), of dense photonic knots (called an electron, also a probabilistic membrane in the abstract description, a fractal of dense photonic quanta in ∆ST theory), of cells (your skin), of humans (the above surface of the Earth), of Gaia (the above surface of the earth with all other beings) etc. etc. do have ‘width’ or ‘height’ depending how you call the ‘thickness’ because it is made of fractal points. So by bidimensionality we mean that in general for most systems of the Universe:
Length (dimension of motion) > Width (dimension of iteration/reproduction) >> Height (dimension of information)
This is the case of galaxies, the Universe, Gaia (information coming from the sun’s height) and the skin of living beings (information coming from senses perceiving perpendicular waves).
Except in the case of ‘specialized’ sheets of information (screens, paper, humans as wholes, informative species, antennae), where the Dimension of information is the largest one, and that of energy the smaller one:
Information (height) > Width (iteration – bilateral in man) > Length (energy-motion).
This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.
So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘Dimotions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.
So each point is in fact a 3-dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on. Yet those dimensions are the so-called fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point.
In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: Tƒ be a fractal world, a space-time in itself.
‘Any Non-Euclidean point is a fractal space-time with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the st+1 ecosystem in which it exists’
This simple law is the most important law of the 4th paradigm, foreseen by Leibniz in his Monadology, the foundation of the mathematical model of Multiple spaces-times that completes the 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry and gives us the tools necessary to create a complex new logic and new mathematical model of the Universe, easy to connect through topology with the isomorphisms of the previous paradigm of a single metric space-time continuum.
Further on those points must be described always in 4 dimensions, with motion. This should have been obvious, but abstract mathematics simplify entities into numbers and static forms, and organic motion properties disappear. Yet we still say ‘San Francisco is at 8 hours from LA’, because we mean that journey is a combination of the motion of a car and the spatial distance. Thus we measure reality in Time-space, not only in space as Euclidean maths do.
Thus, in the same way Saturn’s rings stop being planes without volume when we come closer and observe them as fractal points, called planetoids; Non-Euclidean points acquire both motion and volume when we approach to them. In words of Klein, a sphere is not a continuous static form, but a group of points in cyclical movement. So in the same way the Saturn’s rings are a group of planetoids, a Klein space – the space-time that fills a point has motion – it is the sum of a series of cycles5.
Einstein didn’t go further, adapting the other 4 Euclidean postulates to the new Geometrical unit: a fractal point with volume. Only then we will be able to define the 2 planes of physical forces, the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism, or any system in which several planes of space-time co-exist together (as in a human being extended from atomic to social planes of cyclical existence).
In all those systems planes are made with cellular points, Riemannian spheres with volume that form lines, which are waves between points that exchange ‘—motions’ and information and planes, which are organs of self-similar points that process ‘Dimotions’ or information in parallel networks. Thus the 5 Postulates of Non-E Geometry vitalize the Universe as a series of networks of ‘Dimotions’ and information of self-similar cellular points. Since the line and the plane acquire volume and become self-similar to the commonest forms of the Universe, the wave and the network of points with a 3-D volume.
This simple fact explains one of the most important discoveries of modern physics, the Holographic principle, according to which information might be bidimensional, as in the screen of a computer or the page of a book. Now bidimensionality no longer becomes ‘magic’ since the 3rd dimension is the relative size of the ‘fractal point-particle’. Thus bidimensional sheets of information do have a minimal 3rd Dimension; the inner content of the point, which in a relative universe of infinite sizes seems to us a particle-point without volume, as we don’t see either the volume of a sheet of paper or a pixel.
All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks. Now this might sound absurd to the anthropomorphic reader that thinks humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that those points obey in their actions and communicative flows within a network the same isomorphisms:
humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds, the geometries of social groups are also the same and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on ‘Dimotions’ and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. And so that group of isomorphisms of networks becomes a primary why for all beings of the Universe.
A fact the leads us to the final element needed to understand the why of the Universe: ‘non-Euclidean points’ organize networks that become points of a higher scale, which reproduce and organize new networks; and so the Universe keep growing in fractal scales, from particles that organize networks and become atoms that organize networks and become molecules that organize networks and become cells, that become organisms, that become planetary societies and planets and stars form gravitational networks that become galaxies, organized by dark matter into Universal networks.
Because all entities have motion reproduction is merely the repetition of a motion with form. Because each entity has 4 time arrows, all of them trace multiple trajectories in search of those arrows, hence they realize multiple time cycles.
For example, a human feeds on ‘Dimotions’ and information with body and head, reproduces through multiple social cycles and evolves into societies. Our actions are more complex but essentially the same of those of any particle.
INFORMATION VORTICES OF FUTURE-TIMES
In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’.
Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs. Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, functions of space-time. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors. In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only a very intense ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms.
Thus the concept of physicists of a single time arrow is only valid for entropic gaseous states, and their idea that such states must be ‘extended’ to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons. That 150 years after this concept became dogma in military Germany, XIX c. scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive arrow’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which indeed there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.
What languages then matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. For example:
Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:
red colors (spatial entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (temporal information) for animal visual languages
F(x):time-like parameter < (operandi: action) > G(x): space-like parameter, which defines mathematical equations and its simpler Boolean algebra which in computers reduces all to 0 and | truth or false, ±, and its combined gates.
In that regard GST and its ternary laws of time and space are a language which is prior to all languages, even mathematical logic, its closest, more accurate human mental mirror, but NOT the only one.
This I know is a religious dogma of ‘human science’ since Galileo rightly said that the language of god is topological, made of lines, cycles and triangles. But as so many dogmas of science, this is a reductionist view. So we shall not follow the ‘pedestrian concept’ of science, which consists on collecting data, putting it into an equation and wonder not about the conceptual whys of those equations and what they reflect at a deeper level of truth which is the organic, fractal ∆•ST structure of the Universe.
Indeed, the 2 main researchers of scalar, fractal models of the Universe, Mr. Mandelbrot, the pioneer of fractal mathematics, and Nottale, which has worked as I have done since the 90s in fractal, scalar relativity (but only in physics) before the field exploded in detailed accounts do work on the mathematical equations, often creating a short of numerology, as the deepest explanations of the cyclical nature of time and its infinite clocks is still lacking, amazingly enough after a century of Einstein’s discovery.
Fact is without a redefinition of time and space, in the path of Leibniz, Einstein and Planck, the pioneers who still have the best concepts of relational space-time, its infinite clocks and the ‘substance’ of which reality is made – actions; the ‘meaning’ in verbal, HUMAN languages of those accurate equations will be lost and ‘that meaning’ is what truly matters to us.
All this said, we can now consider the fundamental ‘next level’ of complexity of the Generator equation, in the ‘fractal Universe’, as each of those elements becomes a ternary structure giving 3 ‘dimensions of space’, 3 ‘ages of time’, 3 ∆±1 scales of an organic system, and the final ‘whole, 10th dimension’ of the mind-languages that perceive the whole and become a 1-unit of a larger scale.
What would then be this kind of consciousness? Likely a sense of proportion, symmetry, balance and beauty. It does NOT matter in any case the ultimate inner sensations of physical matter, but the outer description of the actions of those singularities, which do order and reflect a mathematical organization around them, when in its solid crystal state they act with the program of existence, reproducing the information of that minimalist mind image. Indeed, a crystal grows with a symmetry which its inner image reflects back in the growth of ‘crystal cells’. And that is called reproduction, the objective definition of life, of a whole being in the fractal Universe.
Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). This is perhaps the biggest discovery of GST:
In the graph, time is truly beautiful in its three arrows when we ad the psychological everyday dimension of inner perception of man of those three arrows. Time doesn’t pass when reproduction occurs, which gives the orgasmic feeling of immortality proper of all re=productive actions of the eternal fractal. Time does pass when the system evolves in time as it accelerates, and so time passes also in nature’s clocks, quantum charges and masses and any physical vortex of the kind, V(t) x R(s) = K(st), the equation of the vortex – a time equation of 5D metric, as time we conclude PASSES, MOVING UP AND DOWN 5 D Scales.
As time is acceleration and acceleration is form of wholes, we conclude the time arrow of acceleration is in the fifth dimension so time only evolves through motions in the fifth dimension and this opens further the complete fully grasping of the essential nature of time sequential order.
The informative arrows of time properly translated into an accelerated ‘vortex of time’ in our scales of the Universe (energy functions, hƒ in the quantum scale, kT in the thermodynamic scale, mv in the gravitational ∆1 scale) become masses, temperatures and angular planck constants are time flows which leave a trace in space, as each cycle persists a given dynamic timespace of existence.
Time only passes towards the ‘future’ when things change, and change in the sense of a growth of information. THIS FOLLOWS immediately of our definition of the three arrows of time. In biology it means to get older, and grow your information faster than your energy, once passes the first age of entropy, after your seed of information emerges in the upper scale, ∆+1 of you world cycle of existence.
In physical systems it means that time clocks accelerate towards the future, as they shrink in size and increase its attractive force (of all ∆+§). We can then understand the constant emergence of ‘new clocks of time’, of the three specific arrows (hence lineal time clocks, wave-like time clocks and curved, vortex-like time clocks towards the future). How can we trace this ‘evolution of timespace clocks of physical systems on its three arrows?
The study on how those first time clocks of the gravitational dark space and entropy (the limit of perception in the lower scales) evolve through all the scales of existence to become vortices of black holes (the limit of perception of the upper scales) could be considered the meaning of physics in GST, and in the process it follows the same laws and Disomorphisms of all other species.
CHARGE-MASS-EDDIE: WORMHOLES BETWEEN ∆ SCALES.
The limit of dimensional form is for a given ∆-scale are the 3+3 symmetric dimensions of space-time of any topological being in existence. So the wave that moves in a present scale will have less ∆-dimensions that the vortex, regardless of its similar number of space-time symmetries in a single plane. And in that single plane, as the vortex accelerates inwards, it will also have one more dimension of motion-time, acceleration, over the steady state, constant speed of the wave.
Thus the real magic of time vortices is to act as bridges between scales of the fifth dimension, and as such they are the most fascinating objects of physical systems.
And so the informative, particle/head of a system, is the part with more dimensional form, which for most physical systems will be a vortex that has as a cyclical form with more dimensions than the entropic line. As the vortex is accelerated, it will also ad a time dimension to the constant wave:
In the graph, singularities of charges, fluid vortices and masses, are future accelerated states of the different scales of space-time of the Universe. We shall be able to unify them with a simple fractal Unification equation, as they are all vortices of time, whose only difference is the ‘scale’ of size and ‘speed of its time clocks’, unified by 5D metric: Spe x tiƒ= K.
Now the paradox of those vortices which we claim to have more dimensions than waves and fields that seem to us far more extended is the fact that from our point of view, which does NOT see the lower scales of the quantum systems, as they are outside our maximal range of informative perception ∆±3), seem just point-particles without any dimensionality at all. On the contrary they ARE systems which ‘penetrate’ as ‘wormholes’ through the different scales of the fifth dimension.
They are the elements that communicate those scales through cut offs of discontinuity, studied latter in great detail, in which our parameters of ‘distance’ (rods of lineal motion), time frequency and energy, which combine both ‘change’. So while in the graph, the 3 vortices are accelerated≈future dimensions of time-clocks; the parameters we use will change.
Motions have different ways to perceive them. Smaller regions might hold higher densities, as larger evanescent bubbles might be only the external membrane of the wholeness. As we enter the particle-head states of maximal density however speed accelerates as we decrease size and the being increases its existential tempo.
In the graph, 3 representations, the classic one as a sink is NOT real, the second one is a real picture – a charges as a vortex of time, the 3rd one, is a fractal picture of a hurricane. So mass is a vortex-clock of information, evident in a simple fusion of two equations; E=hƒ + E=mc² M=ƒ(K).
So mass is a vortex of time of the larger cosmological scale and a charge of a lower scale. But since smaller clocks run faster, as faster vortices attract more, charges are paradoxically stronger forces of attraction that cosmic gravitational scales.
The physical Universe is made of those three arrows of time as any other system of reality, which we must define for its three fundamental scales, as physical systems are also part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and ðime clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar ðime§pace. In the next graphs we see the general model of 5D scales of §pace and 3 ages of ðime, and its application to physical systems – which will thereafter be upgraded with the new model of relational §pace-ðime:
In the graph, an example of the power of the new formalism: We will be able to find using the metric of 5D the saint grail of physics, the unification equation of charges and masses, which are just future informative accelerated vortices of time in the quantum and gravitational scale (principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration by Einstein). So mass attracts as a hurricane does in our thermodynamic scale, the faster the frequency of its cycles: m=ƒ (h/c²). So the mass of a vortex is proportional to the frequency of its accelerated cycles.
II. BIOLOGIC SYSTEMS
All systems also evolve according to the arrow of information increasing the height of its dimension of gauging information as the evolution of reptiles into birds or mammals into humans show. So in its 3rd age evolution grows information:
TRAVELS IN QUANTIC SPACE-TIME
‘Bodies are present, Limbs are entropic past guided by informative heads towards the future’ ‘The Universe tries to conserve its presents of existence, in their point of balance, S=T, death and birth are the two mirrors out of balance, Max. S, Max. T, which terminate and generate a potential present of existence.
Sancho, On the duality of past>future, present≈present Universal functions for all physical, biological and sociological systems
Palingenesis, the seminal creation of an informative seed from the relative past of minimal evolution, which will develop in time creating a new born. It is essentially a form of reproduction, as its goal is to return to the present, thus we shall study it on the present arrow.
Movement in a discontinuous Universe. The quantic jump in space and time.
The most complex phenomenon of Quantic Spaces-Times is the quantic jump in space-time. Non-AE logic is quantic and so all changes and displacements are also quantic. And since time is geometric, bidimensional, as space is, it has also 2 directions of movement.
So the oldest quantic question of philosophy is: how in a quantic world filled with discontinuities can exist continuous movement? Zeno, a Greek philosopher put the example of Achilles and the Turtle: Achilles will never reach a turtle because there are infinite quantic spaces it has to cross.
Parmenides gave him the answer: continuous movement doesn’t exist in a discreet Universe; it is a mirage of the senses. Since a wave, as the figure shows, is not really moving, but reproducing information over the potential energy of the vacuum in a sequential, quantic jump, through a series of wave-lengths, drawn one after another, which appear to the senses as a moving wave. Movement is always a discontinuous displacement either in space or in time, in any of its 2 directions, towards the past or the future.
The simplest analogy is a television screen where new images are created constantly without hardly any cost of energy, because they are virtual images created by illuminating 3 colors that are already potentially in the screen.
In the case of a wave, the relative energy imprinted by the logic form might vary, from the vacuum energy of a light wave to the placental energy of a mother, yet the process is always the same: a form imprints another region of space, changing its spatial position and temporal morphology. So speed is synonymous of reproduction, the main cyclical action of the Universe.
Thus we can explain all physical events in terms of vitalism. Since even movement, the external, mechanical change physicists study, turns out to be also an organic cycle of reproduction. And we distinguish, according to their quantity of energy and information ‘translated’ in the process from a place of space-time to another place, 3 quantic, reproductive jumps:
– Sp=T: Space-time reproduction dominant in spatial displacement, that implies a minimal movement of information that fluctuates from a future to a past form and returns back to the future. For example, when an electric impulse arrives to the end of a nerve, it becomes translated into chemical information and then it is transferred chemically through the synapses to the other cell, where it becomes translated back into electric information.
That process implies a ‘spatial, quantic jump’ from a neuron to the next neuron, but also a quantic jump in time from a level of informative complexity, the electric language to the lower level of chemical languages, which is the relative, past informative system of life .
The informative essence of the process implies a transcription of form from each discontinuous point to the next point but also a movement in space, since ‘all yang has a drop of yin’, all is temporal energy, also spatial and temporal reproduction requires a minimal dual movement in time and space.
-Max. Sp: Spatial, wave reproduction of a wave a particle that jumps from one place to the next place, reproducing a minimal temporal form. It is very common in physical waves, defined by its speed of reproduction, V=S/T. Depending on the density of a form, its speed of reproduction will vary. So the most massive forms are slower than those whose informations are minimal and can imprint the energy of vacuum very fast. Those forms that hardly move however evolve a lot in time:
– Max. Tƒ: Temporal, palingenetic reproduction, when an organism produces a past, smaller, simpler seed that reproduces the being, evolving faster towards the future. So a fetus is ‘born’ when it comes out of the body of the mother to the next discontinuous region of the Universe, making a minimal spatial jump and a huge evolutionary, temporal jump.
The quantic jump in time. Palingenetic reproduction and Emergence. Travel to the past.
A quantic jump in space-time which is dominant in information is a palingenetic reproduction, the repetition of a form, through the parental reproduction of a simpler seed or relative past form that will evolve and reproduce a new space-time, a future son form. Palingenesis means truly that a fetus is a past form that evolves, recapitulating a series of evolutionary forms from past to future, as quantic time can both travel to the past becoming a simpler form (as in death) or accelerate its informative evolution (as in a process of creative design or fetal evolution).
Yet, since time is discontinuous those movements in time only affect a quantic part of the Universe; and so they are possible without creating paradoxes. The universe doesn’t move to the past, only the seminal seed. So palingenesis is a dual movement in time:
– Backwards towards the remote past as the parents produce a single cell, packed with dense genetic DNA information. Followed by…
– A fast movement forwards to the future as the fetus creates a parallel form to its parents:
A species of relative past (simple palingenetic entity) evolves towards the future into a macro-system that organizes itself over a surface of relative cellular energy, thanks to the ‘future’ placental parents that accelerate its evolution into a new ‘present’ being in a friendly environment rich in energy – the mother womb.
Thus, the final balance between past and future is re-established when the being surfaces back into the present in the moment of conception. In this manner evolution maximizes its efficiency with the min. expenditure of energy:
The fetus is a temporal, evolutionary form. In the graph, we draw palingenetic reproduction as a fluctuation between 3 planes of growing complexity, in which a ‘life’ occurs: the ∆+1 social plane, the individual plane of the parents, and the ∆+1 biological plane of cells.
Since in AE-logic geometry simple-past beings and future-complex beings co-exist in discontinuous ∆-planes of existence of different complexity. And indeed, the fetus lives in a discontinuous world, the mother womb, which finally opens up through an aperture, the vagina, to the bigger world in which the newborn enters…
According to the ‘black hole paradox’ the fetus and the baby are born as ‘highly informative species’: The baby has a huge Head that is 1/4th of his body size. Then both the fetus and the baby will go through a dual fluctuation, growing in energy and information till reaching maturity.
First, when the species is born after its fetal, informative evolution, its starts its young age, increasing its energy. So the newborn will soon compensate its excess of information with its accelerated, energetic growth, as all forms try to find an Sp=T balance .
Thus, the fetus in its first age of energy will expand its lineal limbs, elongating its body. Now its body grows much faster than the Head till reaching a 9 body Vs 1 Head proportion proper of many spatial Vs informative, decametric systems. Also its neurons will be in a 1-9 relationship to the glia cells that feed its energy and multiply very fast.
At that point the baby enters the mature age and reproduces a new baby. Then it grows again in information into its 3rd age and finally it dies. In the past decade there has been an enormous development of the science of evol-devol, based in palingenesis, in the lines foreseen in our first books . Biological palingenesis is in fact the only palingenesis accepted by science. But palingenesis happens also in the sociological and physical world.
Physical Palingenesis. Movement and wave-particle fluctuations: Reproduction in space.
3 dual Quantic Spaces-Times jumps in 3 scales of existence, in which a ‘seed’ of relative past information emitted by a future parental form hosts in an energy surface, evolving towards the future:
A photon reproduces a particle-antiparticle.
A spermatozoid starts the evolution of a child. And a prophet emits a verbal code that will recreate in the future a dying civilization.
In the graph, a particle moves, reproducing a quantic wave or ‘field of matter’, since in fact all physical movements reproduce a form in a field of energy . Thus the reproductive speed of a wave that imprints a surface of spatial energy is also a quantic jump in space-time. The spatial energy will vary but the process is always the same.
For example, a wave of light reproduces a photon one wave after another over the gravitational energy of vacuum . In that sense the particle-wave duality implies that each wave of light ‘dies’ and it is reborn in the discontinuous, next region of space-time as a palingenetic, new wave. And indeed, the waveform of an electromagnetic disturbance is exactly the same wave form that the standard waveform of the 3 ages of space-time .
Thus, though a spatial wave is mainly a quantic jump of spatial energy, it also requires a degree of informative transference and so it can also be considered a palingenetic dual process of reproduction, defined in illogic symbols as a wave-particle fluctuations: Sp>T<Sp>T. Those particle-wave fluctuations are a common phenomenon in the physical Universe: electronic orbitals fluctuate between its particle and wave state; particles die and explode into the past reproducing spatial fields, while spatial fields implode into particles as they evolve into the future; singularities explode into big-bangs that latter evolve towards the future in big-banging, reproductive processes.
However, when a wave-particle fluctuation ends in the travel towards the past and doesn’t evolve further it becomes a death phenomenon if the spatial wave does not evolve back into a particle or a palingenetic reproduction.
Sociological palingenesis. The prophet.
An open question for those who believe in mysticism is: if the fetus is born into a higher plane of existence, do we have also for man a second birth after death into an even higher plane of existence? The previous graph explains that possibility; latter studied in more detail, as it compares the palingenesis of a fetus with similar processes, which happen to other species. For example, 2 electrons emit 2 seminal light rays that merge together creating a new electron as the 2 lineal waves of electromagnetism evolve towards the future acquiring finally a cyclical electronic form.
Yet since the informative code of human beings is verbal, we consider the prophet, the original human, memetic, verbal, seminal, ethic code of a religious civilization that starts a palingenetic radiation in the mind of his believers. Indeed, civilizations are social organisms made with human verbal cells, joined by a verbal/nervous network of ethic laws, produced by a prophet that imprints the Book of Revelation, the memetic code of the civilization in those minds.
So the prophet is the seminal cell that reproduces and finally shapes a new organic civilization. And the fact that most prophets are born when the ‘father’ is going to die, in the baroque age of a culture prior to its extinction, explains quite clearly how certain human beings transcend death and become immortal as the ‘informative code’ of the future civilization they create. But as only a sperm cell reaches the future ovule, only a prophet among millions of humans creates a macro-organism of history, a civilization. We won’t be that lucky, I’m afraid. As Tertulianus said: ‘Sangris martire semen cristianorum’.
The Law of quantic jumps: the minimal distance of those jumps.
According to the 2 arrows of past energy and future information, all space-time movements are dual cycles. So in all of them, there is a degree of genetic reproduction and travel to the past through a basic transformation of an informative form into a simpler language or cell that is able to cross the discontinuities of the Universe and then evolve back into the original form. It should not surprise us as all cycles require the dual arrows of past-energy and informative order; and all cycles are memorial repetitions=reproductions of a cycle that has happened before in the past.
We don’t demonstrate any of the events explained in this book, since it would require developing the entire logic-mathematical formalism of Quantic Spaces-Times fields we have thoroughly escaped. Yet, given its importance to understand hierarchical organisms, we shall enunciate the general law of those quantic jumps that structure organic systems through social planes, Ei, of different information, among which the quantic jumps take place:
`The mean distance in space-time between 2 ‘relative cells’, ∆-1, of a quantic organic system, i, equals the distance between its relative ‘molecular systems’, ∆-2, both in time and space.’
So beings seem continuous because their discontinuity is minimal, only a ‘cellular’ distance, both in space (so between axons, a simple chemical molecule overcomes the jump) and time (so chemical information, the next simpler language of life, jumps and translates the electronic message through hormonal discharges).
Again between molecules the most habitual distance is that of an atom of 10-10 m; and between atoms in its solid, informative state, the usual distance is a valence electron, its lower formal level. While between electron orbits the quantum jump is a photon with a constant of space-time, h, which is omnipresent in all the electronic cycles. In the same way a biological, quantic jump that reproduces a fetus implies the minimal quantic jump in space as the child is born contiguously to its mother.
The empirical proves of quantic jumps to the past.
PAST and future are terminologies of human philosophy with multiple interpretations which intuitively have seen a higher reality.
THE CONCEPT of a repetitive wave as a present function that dynamically conserves through iteration a present generation upon generation, the reproductive female function has always existed as one of the two poles of reality.
The other being the destructive & creative dual field = particle synchronicity of a field of relative past energy that guides the future motions of the particle that somehow moves by praying on it, exploding its field form in entropy and displacing within that entropy in a relative free motion around a cyclical path wave, in which its internal particle-clock will close an action of self-existence.
Such duality of being as a form that repeats its internal form with a symmetry on the space-time field in which it moves as opposed to a particle that dynamically plays between hierarchical scales the asymmetry of entropy and information arrows between ∆±1 scales is essential to classify all phenomena of all sciences.
In the graph, particles explode into entropy a lower ∆-1 plane which expands its motion, through which the particle moves. This entropic ∆-1 pilot wave of Max. Spe≈ed and Min. Information thus provide a ‘sliding flow’ which the particle surfs in any relative cyclical director in a series of quantum steps as it keeps ‘exploding’ ∆-1 entropic guiding waves.