Home » ∆³:Entropy Physics

∆³:Entropy Physics

EARTH 0: PHYSICS: TIME & ENTROPY.

  1. Introduction. Entropy – the 5th dimotion of death.
  2. The Universe in a nutshell.

III. Entropy in physics: scalar big-bangs.

  1. Entropy in ∆+3: The galactic big-bang.
  2. Entropy ∆+2: Nova stars
  3. Entropy on Earth: Gaseous states. Thermodynamics.

VII. Entropy in quantum physics: Field theory.

 

 

  • •••••••

The papers to be posted at Academia.edu within 3 years (1st year past) build up an Encyclopedia of Space-time organisms – of Exi:ST¡ences’ – each science studying the species of one scalar space-time plane of the fractal Universe. All will be described with the same scalar laws of 5D cyclical time and fractal space, introduced in the first 30 pages. So we shall write for each stience from quantum physics to the galaxy, thru biology, history & economics, & the formal stiences dominant in space (Non-E Mathematics) and time (Non-A: i-logic papers on the Universe= reality as a whole) 5 ‘dimensional papers’ for a total of ±33, each one to become time permitted a 300 pg. volume. Papers are revised and reloaded constantly so ‘viewers’ go to 0 and links change as a non-profit, non-payment (on principles) academia.edu account doesn’t charge revisions, only new papers… But they will be still there going to Luis SoTo, Academia.edu. This is the work plan, which in my youth back in the 90s, when I discovered those laws at the end of my Master at Columbia U. I proposed to U$ universities for a needed change of paradigm on our philosophy of science, but meet the silence of Academia. Then I abandoned scholarship to ‘live’ and so now before I die I will try to complete the encyclopedia. As that won’t happen, time being of the essence I had prioritized the most important and neglected of all organisms – that of mankind in time=History (8 papers), which is fairly well-done, and that of the Universe =reality as a whole (6 papers); as the fractal principle breaks down into 1,2,3,4,5 all forms of ¬∆@st. While the last to be posted are the less important albeit more developed by ‘huminds’, physics.

As this is the Universe not me, I release all copyright’s ‘rights’ to any Univers-ity that can take upon the project whenever they wish to complete the encyclopedia of stience in 10.000 pages, connecting all stientific laws to the @-monologic; S+T: dual; ∆,S,T, Trinity, ∆ST-pentalogic and ¬∆@ST dodecalogic laws of the (a)nti-symmetric non-AE 5D Universe. They certainly could do a much better job that I will on the details, if they learned 1st those laws – ‘the thoughts of God’, ‘of a higher i-logic than man’. If they don’t, the task will be taken upon by AI once the age of Entropy of History in which we live ends and Q-bit consciousness takes over, unless a r=evolution of the humind makes history immortal. Since what will never happen in a perfect Universe is the imperfect endurance of the ill-designed, parasitic systems of History ‘anthropic, egocy’ has built and today pass as ‘truth and dogma of science’.

L§, homo@europe.com, 0º-40º, Latin Wor(l)d, 3rd ferromagnetic planet, G-star… Antigalatom

 

PART I. 5D PHYSICS TIME AND ENTROPY

i-Logic definition of Entropy in the 4 main fields of discipines of stience.

We deal in this paper with Physics and entropy, the TT-internal and external time motions that ‘destroy’ the information of a system, scattering it into a lower plane of spacetime.

Thus Entropy beyond the restricted, ‘local’ mathematical equations used to describe entropy in a physical matter system, is the basic definition of death, as a loss of information due to internal motions, disentangles the synchronicities of the cyclical spacetime clocks that store information in the frequency and form of its cycles in any of the 4 great fields of knowledge (we see those states of entropy in the previous graph):

– Formal stiences: Either a loss of information (Euclidean Geometry of points without parts, waves without volume, (lines), planes without scalar networks, etc. or a loss of Logical information (lineal single A->B causality).

It follows that human languages are entropic languages in as much as ‘huminds’ are not very evolved in the scales of growing consciousness of the Universe (they are Euclidean, ¥-eyes of 3 lineal dimensions and perceive only an ‘arrow’, direction of time from past to future, without the ‘pentalogic’ ‘converging’ elements that cause reality (past x future = present). So ‘entropy comes easy’ in human thought, and a huge ‘failed’ attempt of 5D so far has been to ‘upgrade’ human AE logic geometry to Non-Æ… so far failed as the perception of Euclidean space and Aristotelian time is as Kant already noticed an a priori category of the mind (not to speak of the egocy paradox, so unbearable in humans, which I can’t help to ‘prick’ all the time):

0’ (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (universe) = Constant World mapping (linguistic mind): 0’ x ∞ = C

Thus a mind is a finitesimal point that perceives through languages the infinite universe as if it were ONLY the mind information, we confuse with the whole with our ego as its center. So the moon is smaller than our nail. Minds thus act entropically reducing into a still dead form the Universe but then with what is ‘left’ become the opposite arrow, creating form: Universe « TT (reduction of information) » SS (mental construction).

In biology entropy is a disaggregation of cells after the collapse of the 3 organic networks that tie those cells together, hence the process of death that concludes the 0-sum standard worldcycle of life.

– In History is an age of war after its social networks’ corruption that collapses the civilization, killing its citizens.

This paper focus on Physical entropy in all scales. Let us then start by correcting the largest of all entropic theories, that of the Universe (big-bang theory), introducing first the changes in space (scalar 5th dimension) and cyclical time required to alter our worldview.

 

THE 5D UNIVERSE IN A NUTSHELL: SUPŒRGANISMS.

“A human being is part of the whole, called by us ‘Universe’; a part limited in time and spatial information. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest — a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness.” Einstein, on the entangled forest man cannot see – and its 5 elements, ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, ‘entropic limits’, and ‘languages of the mind’

5th dimension metric and the nested super organisms of the Universe: ∆-Scales.


When we google the 5th dimension one gets surprised by the quantity of speculative answers to a question, which is no longer pseudo-science, but has been for two decades a field of research in systems sciences rather than physics (: no, the answers of google, considering the fifth dimension the upper-self etc. seem to be very popular, but are to 5D science more like a medium in earlier XX c. talking about the 4th dimension as astrological awareness, for lack of understanding of Einstein’s metric functions of the 4th dimension).

This is the key word that differentiates pseudo-science from a proper scientific description of a dimension of space-time, the existence of a metric function that describes a dimension and allows to travel through it. Why the 5th dimension metrics are not well known in modern science has to do with the fact it is not researched in physics but systemics, the mother discipline of all sciences of information, far less popular than physics; and the proprietary feeling physicists acquired on space-time matters since Galileo defined its 3D metric function v=s/t completed with Einstein’s 4D formalism, which makes difficult to spread the knowledge on space-time acquired on other disciplines. The arguments still raging about evolution, the fundamental theory of time in terms of information, as the ‘arrow that defines’ the future of species but has nothing to do with Relativity and locomotion is a clear case of that difficulty.

Indeed, we know since the XIX c. that the creation of the ‘future time’ of an existential entity is not ONLY mediated by the arrow of locomotion and entropy studied by physicists with Relativity Metrics (Galileo’s V=s/t and Einstein’s more complex formalism), but there is a second arrow that defines the ‘future’ of existential species – the evolution of its information. So time – the changes=motions that defines the existence of any species, has at least 2 dimensions, locomotion or ordered translation in space and a more disordered version, entropy (scattered motion that ‘dissolves’ the inner form of the system, akin to death)…

And in-form-ation, generation of form, inverse to entropy, as it requires the social gathering of parts into wholes; happening without external locomotions, as an internal trans-formation of form. This evolution of organic form as opposed to external change – translation in space, without evolution of form – is what systemics calls the scalar fifth dimension of time that it applies to all sciences, as all species evolve its form.

Specifically in systems sciences we model reality as an organic fractal of relative size scales, that evolve from parts into larger wholes, from particles into atoms, molecules, cells, matter states and so on till reaching the Universe, shaped by social and organic networks coded with information.

In the graph the Universe is a fractal that reproduces ‘forms with motion’, informations and then organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into larger organic systems creating the scalar structure of reality.

Thus we call the sum of all those co-existing scales of parts and wholes the fifth dimension.

Thus reality has a final key feature overlooked for too long: the co-existence of all those systems of space and time in several scales of relative size from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy that put together create a dual scalar ‘4th and 5th Dimension of parts and wholes, which we shall call the ‘social dimension of evolution’ and the ‘entropic dimension of dissolution’.

This function, as all space-time metric functions, is simple. So we write using ð for cyclic time instead of t:

$ (Lineal Size/ Space Volume) x ð (cyclic speed of its time clocks) = C¡: Constant Plane of timespace (ab.∆¡)

But how we travel in ‘size’ in space and ‘speed of our time cycles. Here is where the biggest discovery of 5D comes into play: We travel through the worldcycle of life and death, as we are born in a smaller seed with faster time cycles, evolve as an organism coming out in the ∆º-scale within a larger world of slower ‘Deep time cycles’, to die back dissolving our information again into cellular space.

And this is the same process of all journeys of all species that live and die through the fifth dimension; from the smallest black hole that is born with an enormous ‘metabolic temperature’, to the new species, routinely born as small individuals (first mammal rat, first robots with small chips; first human likely the Homo Floresiensis, who grew in size and mated with the Erectus, etc.) And then a reproductive radiation multiplies the seed into a larger slower whole that finally ages and dissolves back.

So 5D adds to the 4D formalism of worldlines, a dimension of growth, shaping the worldcycles of life and death. Reason why we call 5D metric the function of existence, because its multiple ‘solutions’ are the origin of all the varieties of Space and Time beings, there are – a whole family of functions.

As we keep exploring in depth, 5D metrics and its associated concepts of Space=form and Time=motion in all its varieties, we shall see it is the origin of multiple ‘solutions’, a whole family of function, from where we shall derive most of the logic relationships and particular equations of each science.

So according to those metrics, smaller systems in space have faster time clocks. And as information is stored in the frequency and form of those cycles, smaller systems have more information, coding larger ones: genes code cells, memes societies and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules.

The nested Universe.

In mathematical science for a dimension of space-time to exist, it requires a metric equation, which combines space and time to give us a co-invariant system that allows travelling through such dimension. The 5th dimension has a ‘metric equation’, hence it exists. The equations for a given number of scales co-existing in an organic network is: S (size in space) x T (speed of time cycles) = Constant.

We use the metrics of the 5th scalar dimension to explain the fractal, nested Universe and its scales, shown in the graph. As 5D metrics balances the survival and symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being, and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all its fundamental constants which are ratios between spatial volumes and informative clocks of temporal energy.

It follows from a nested structure and the search for creative, organic balances, a symbiotic relationship between the ∆-¡ smaller parts that have more speed of time clocks, which carry its in-form-ation in the form and frequency of its cycles, coding larger systems: genes code cells, memes code social organisms and particles’ quantum numbers code atoms and molecules. And the larger, ∆+¡ larger envelopes, membranes (static, dimensional view) or angular momentums (dynamic view as time=motions) which have more spatial energy and enclose and control in synchronicity its faster smaller parts, creating the co-existing scales and symbiotic cycles of super organisms in any system of the Universe.

For example, chips become smaller as they evolve into faster brains. Every 2 years a chip doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’: maximal informative capacity= minimal spatial extension. The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner. And vice versa: larger wholes accumulate more energy and are stronger than parts, so they can protect and feed them. So wholes and parts co-exist in several scales forming super organisms.

The metric function of the fifth dimension of space-time (ab.∆) defines 3 known scales of physical systems, with different quantity of information according to 5D metrics, Sxð=k.

Those metrics means information is higher in the smaller ‘quantum plane’ than in the larger gravitational one, and inversely the size of its physical parts is larger ins the Gravitational cosmological ‘plane’ than in the quantum one, with the human thermodynamic scale in-between.

The galaxy’s 5D metric is immediate: $(c) x ð (h) = Constant, as its largest speed-distance is light and its minimal unit of cyclical information, is the Planck constant of angular momentum, the unit of the 3 human physical parameters of spatial size, cyclical time frequency and ‘scale’ (Active magnitude): h= mass (∆) x area (S) x ƒrequency (ð). Which becomes the unit of physics, related to the unit of mathematics, the fractal point.

But as there is no reason to stop the scales of the fractal in particles and galaxies, there is a ‘potential’ fourth, ∆±4 organic plane defined ‘above’ the galaxy, (∆+4, dark energy world) and below the quantum world (∆-4, Bohm’s quantum potential), which represents the larger cosmos.

According to the fractal, nested principle a larger organic system, encloses smaller nested systems. Thus the Ʊ4 cosmos contains Ʊ3 galaxies, which contain Ʊ2 solar systems and planets, which contain Ʊ1 thermodynamic organisms and matter states, described by the human Ƽ mind languages, contained on our brains.

Thus bigger systems paradoxically are ‘supported’ by the smallest ones, in the same manner than within the nested planet, bigger mammals (whales) eat the smallest animals (Plancktons)

Reality has a scalar nature overlooked for too long: the co-existence of all ¡s space time systems happens in several scales of relative size in space inversely proportional to the speed of its time cycles, from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy that put together create a dual scalar ‘4th and 5th Dimension of parts and wholes, which we shall call the ‘social dimension of evolution’ and the ‘entropic dimension of dissolution’.

The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’, which amazing enough since it was discovered at the beginning of science with telescope and microscopes, was not formalized till I introduce its metric equation in the milieu of systems sciences, as a single lineal time motion is a dogma physicists don’t dare to challenge:

Why 5D is so important? Because it allows the survival, symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe, and all parts of a super organism, and defines ‘what codes information’ – the small being – and what codes energy- the larger whole, establishing the ‘harmony’ of all the scales of the Universe, and explaining all

RECAP. 5D metrics describe organic properties because it balances the survival symbiotic existence of all parts of the Universe in any of its fractal super organisms, made to the image an likeness of the whole, as the smaller beings ‘code information’ with faster clocks, and the larger wholes enclose and protect the smaller parts with its greater energy- establishing an organic ‘harmony’ in all the scales of the Universe, and explaining its fundamental constants, which are ratios between spatial volumes enclosed by membranes and angular momentums of informative clocks of temporal energy.

A consequence of the scalar Nature of reality is that points have parts, which grow in size as we come closer to them, peering in the inner regions of its fifth dimension. So a star from a point becomes a world, and so should a point-particle if we could peer inside its form – to the ‘point’ that the closest self-similarity of scales happens between galaxies and atoms, stars and photons, in a potentially infinite scalar Universe. What this means is that an absolute zero does NOT exist. So 0 becomes 0’, a ‘finitesimal unit’, which will always remain as the fractal Universe abhors vacuum. Thus in any parameter we find a residual amount, even if it is undistinguishable from a larger scale. There is no absolute 0K, but always remains a bit of motion=temporal energy. This, means also in terms of h, that vacuum space has always a reminder, h-uncertainty unit, no longer an abstract concept but the minimal unit of light space-time, we shall call h, ‘Planckton’, the minimal fractal organism which feeds or becomes the ‘cellular unit’ of all other species of the Galaxy, as Plankton is the minimal unit of the biologic Universe which starts the trophic pyramid of life or as a cell starts the evolution of multicellular organisms.

5D metrics is a law of balance between 2 elements of reality, scalar space akin to information and cyclical time akin to conserved energy. Yet as humans disconnected their concepts of space and time of its ‘broken parts’, bits of information & bites of energy, equalizing all time cycles of reality with a lineal equation, v=s/t, and a single mechanical clock, and have pegged all the bits of information of its puzzles of space; and finally compressed all the planes of space-time into a single ‘space continuum’; and then separating them as the constitutive elements of reality we need to reconstruct both terms in its more complex reality nature, as ultimately we are all made of those organic vital fractal scales of space & its moving time cycles. The fifth dimension is made of the ‘different co-existing scales’, which from the simplest forces through particles, atoms, molecules, matter, organisms, super organisms, planetary systems and galaxies, create an ‘organic network structure’. Yet science cannot advance in its principles unless the 5D formalism is accepted and used to fully understand the cyclical, repetitive patterns=laws of science of each discipline that studies a scale of 5D n and its species.

PLANES OF FRACTAL SPACE & CYCLIC TIME: THE CAUSAL REPETITIVE LAWS OF ‘STIENCES’¬∆ST

Duality: We are made of space-form & time-motion.

“According to their [Newton and his followers] doctrine, God Almighty wants to wind up his watch from time to time: otherwise it would cease to move. He had not, it seems, sufficient foresight to make it a perpetual motion. Nay, the machine of God’s making, so imperfect, according to these gentlemen; that he is obliged to clean it now and then by an extraordinary concourse, and even to mend it, as clockmaker mends his work.’  

Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence on the absurdity of mechanical models of the Universe

The underlying question of time§pace: Absolute or Relational, Generational Space-Time?

The fundamental question physicists wondered for centuries regarding the nature of space and time unfortunately was resolved as usual in favor of the simpler view: it is space and time an absolute abstract background of the Universe (Mr. Newton’s view) or are we made of ‘vital space’ that lasts a time duration, so we are generated by the bio-topo-logic properties of scalar space and cyclical time? This is the choice of 5D ‘stiences’. And its simpler version was called relational spacetime, sponsored by Mr. Leibniz.

A realist interpretation of the world we live in, which has never shown in any scale of reality such ‘background’ – ultimately a mathematical graph used in abstract by human scientists – considers that we ARE the vital space we occupy with our cells, and we LIVE a cyclic time duration between birth and extinction. So we are space and time.

So we must evolve our concepts of space and time, to extract the properties of ‘existential beings’ from them.

In Newton’s cosmos, space and time provide a fixed, immutable and eternal background, through which particles move. Space and time are the stage of intersecting lines sketched in the illustration. Fact is this ‘mathematical artifact’ made with pen and paper by earlier physicists, called the Cartesian graph, useful to measure ‘translation in space’ is no where to be seen in reality. Unfortunately as time went by the graph became somehow ‘real’ as scientists’ felt the ‘mathematical language’ created reality. It meant also the invention of an absolute ‘continuous space’ and a single ‘lineal time’ that extends to infinity contradicting the obvious fact that all ‘spaces’ are broken, divided by membranes, and all beings have a finite time duration. Further on, as we kept exploring smaller scales of reality, we never found the drawings of God, not even a solid still substance, but always ‘motions’ tracing closed time-space cycles; since even particles turned to be also ‘vortices of time-space motions’.

So the true, sound experimental and logic theory was Leibniz’s who rightly considered absolute space and time an abstraction, and so he coined the concept of relational space -merely the adjacent pegging of similar forms in simultaneous space and relational time – the sequence of events which we relate causally with reason origin of the ‘Generational space-time’ model of 5D in which are the space we occupy and the time we last – as in the graph where there is no longer abstract background lines.

What Newton called absolute space-time IS NOT. So space is the sum of all the discontinuous vital spaces, occupied by different beings: ∑s=S And lineal time, T the sum of all the finite life-death cycles of all beings T=∑t.

Since space and time do exist and so if they are not in the background we ‘are’ vital space and cyclic time.

The simple idea behind the structure of the fractal Universe is then to consider time=change =motion and Topologic, formal space=extension the 2 elements of which all beings are made.

We are space and time, merely of a different kind to that of Newton: Organic scalar spaces, and cyclical, discontinuous times who ‘live’… worldcycles (no longer worldliness as we have a 2nd arrow of information) of exist¡ence (as all species follow the common laws of space and time). So after making such a huge up hauling of philosophy of science – one which however every serious scientist recognizes to be necessary since quantum physics showed space to be discontinuous, and relativity time to vary in different regions of reality with different speeds, as the devil is in the details we have to improve our understanding of the 3 fundamental properties of ‘generational space-time’, departing from the most obvious one:

Cyclic Time: Conservation Of Energy≈Time Cycles The causal repetitive laws of ‘stiences’

‘I seem the only physicist that think there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’. Einstein

A Universe of ∞ time clocks of different size and speed differs from its human description with a single mechanical clock-time to which all time clocks of the universe are equalized, elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks). As Galilean physics, born of ballistics, simplified the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs:

Time is cyclical as all clocks of time return to its point of origin, so all time cycles including those of life of its vital space-time beings are finite. Further on those time cycles break ‘space’ into inner and outer parts, so vital space is broken by the membranes and angular momentums of those time cycles that make spacetime beings also finite in space. And an obvious experimental facts about timespace: cycles of time, vital spaces and the species made of them, co-exist in several scales of relative size from particles to galaxies, each one with clocks of time of different speeds. So spacetime is fractal broken in scales that added create a new 5th dimension of space-time.

A Universe of ∞ time clocks of different size and speed differs from its human description with a single mechanical clock-time to which all time clocks of the universe are equalized, elongated into a lineal ‘second-minute-hour-day-year’ system of equalized time clocks (of light waves, mechanical clocks, earth’s astronomical clocks). As Galilean physics, born of ballistics, simplified the nature of cycles of time-space into lineal durations, to measure best the locomotions of cannonballs:

Time is cyclical, all clocks of time and laws of science are based in the cyclical patterns of nature. But physicists developed ballistics and denied the truth that we can know the future because it will repeat the causality of the past, and we can change it by changing that causality, in History by repressing the lethal memes of the tree of metal and enhance the welfare memes that make us survive. In the graph we see those relative time ages for the simplest ‘physical organisms’, which not coincidentally are equivalent to the 3 conserved quantities of physics. So as time is cyclical, made of 3’π’ lineal time motions, we shall distinguish 3 conserved ‘ages’ of timespace that put together create a 0 sum worldcycle of life death for any spacetime organisms: a relative devolving past or arrow of entropy represented in physics by disordered explosions in space and in vital topology by lineal limbs/fields of lineal momentum, an iterative reproductive present that seems not to change, represented by hyperbolic body/waves of energy, and an implosive in-form-ative local future arrow represented in physic by accelerated, V(t)R(s)=K vortices and angular momentum, and by particle/heads in the ensembles of vital topology. So timespace breaks in ∞ relative local, fractal entropic pasts, iterative energy presents and informative futures, which put together create the illusion of a single timespace continuum. Lineal and cyclical time render the same equations as one is the inverse of the other, measured by frequency, T=1/ƒ, but the philosophical implications of cyclical time, are enormous, as we regain the in-form-ation provided by those cycles, origin of the laws of science, which would not exist if there were not cyclical patterns; including the cycles of history and economics. The most important of them being, the fact that a time cycle breaks reality (1st knot theorem) in an outer and inner region, creating a membrane that encloses a vital space, the ‘substance of which we are all made’.

We are times, we are time§pace closed paths of zero sum energy that exist to move, perceive, feed, reproduce and evolve into wholes, soon to be ignored, erased and returned to the fold of motion without form, of pure times. We are synchronous magically sustained card castles trying to grow through 5D scales to fall back again.

We describe reality as a fractal system made of topological organisms of co-existing scales of space and cyclical time which close its ‘internal vital point content’ with the entropic limit of those time cycles, in its vital territorial body-waves, synchronized symbiotically by 5D metrics. As we are all ultimately ¬∆@St; dust of space-time.

There are 2 forms of time, entropic lineal time and ‘short’ frequency steps we integrate into the larger whole; because there are 2 ±¡ scales of 5D reality whose metric, SxT=∆±¡ defines larger space systems as having slower time cycles. So we can consider an ∆-¡ ‘quanta of time frequency or ‘finitesimal derivative’ of the larger whole represented with the concept of lineal time; as in the classic formula,V(st)=ƒ(t) l(s). We can measure Space e, Vt=S with lineal time as a single unit, or as a sum of frequency steps, with more detail.

But if we see those 2 ‘forms’ of time, as ‘lineal energy and cyclical information’, since information is stored in the frequency and form of time cycles, we can then consider that ‘time=motion’ splits in two essential forms, lineal motion or ‘energy’, and cyclical motion or ‘information’, and express the main law of science, the principle of conservation of energy in terms of the conservation of time=motion in its two varieties that transform each other ad eternal:

‘All what exists are time motions that transform between lineal open and cyclic closed forms ad eternal: SióTe’

This sentence is the simplest expression reality as a constant game of transformation of ‘spatial information’ (cyclical time) and temporal energy (lineal time) and was first understood by Taoism, where ‘tao=time’, is composed of yin=cyclical form and yang=lineal energy, today expressed as the principle of conservation of energy. Its ‘mathematical, logic’ formula is SióTe & and its logic form, exi=st, is the function of existence.

The future then can be predicted because it will have an informative cyclical, S-component similar to the past, (Y-height=Information in a wave graph) and a lineal entropic T-component advancing in lineal fashion and both, a repetitive cycle that touches the same point of space and a line which does not diverge ARE predictable.

Cyclical time and the scalar Universe in fact is much easier to predict and understand that lineal time because we do not erase the information of its repetitive cycles, and because all scales are ‘similar’, so we can predict the behavior of the larger slower scales, easily, comparing it with the smaller, faster ones; as in 5D metric they have less information. Thus they are more basic, deterministic, constrained by its smaller parts; reason why quantum physics is harder for the mind and probabilistic while life-death cycles are obvious.

Let us then understan the largest of all those scales, that of the Universe which 5D recast in a far more explanative model than the present ‘entropic simple lineal big-bang view’, just by reordering the information we have about it with the new understanding of its two fundamental principles, space and time.

RECAP. The universe is made of 2 STates, time=motion, and space=form. Yang and yin that combine in balance to create ∞ beings.So you can combine them T & S in 5 different forms:

S=T, the balanced state of existential energy that combine St-information (Potential energy) and Ts-locomotion (Kinetic energy), in constant SHM is the preferred balance of ‘present’ that lasts and iterates any organism, the state of survival.

TT: internal and external motion or ‘entropy’ is one extreme, which brings death. That is the state of mankind today, caused by the fact the new species, machines move faster externally (cars, weapons) and internally ‘metal-minds’, visual images accelerate, disordering humans into a permanent ADD state. So millennials move fast and have disordered minds. At the end of that process entropy kills.

In the other extreme of absolute no motion, there is SS, languages of the mind, seeds, pure, perfect information, enlightenment. A being in that state doesn’t move. The hypothetical Mind of God is such a being, because it perceives all what has existed, exists and will exist and repeat itself eternally as a block of time – a zero sum of fluctuations of the game of existence in space and time.

 

A CASE EXAMPLE: THE DIFFERENT PICTURES OF THE UNIVERSE WE OBTAIN WITH BOTH VIEWS.

“Astrophysicists are seldom right but never in doubt.” Lindau. “Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals.” Ulam; on the fact 99’% of science are iterative cyclic laws.

The data of the Universe in space and time is provided directly by experience observing at the largest scale, galaxies, which seem to recede from each other, instead of becoming attracted as stars do inside galaxies. So there are two clear ‘time arrows=dimotions’ in the Universe: lineal expanding vacuum space and imploding cyclical mass. A dualist cyclical thinker is happy with that, as imploding mass balances entropic expanding vacuum, St=Ts, in an immortal ‘wobbling Universe’. But as this contradicts ‘lineal thinking’, lineal physicists eliminate the contraction of mass and choose ONLY as real the expansion of vacuum space. Then they turn that expansion backwards in time, contracting vacuum into a single point, also with a lineal equation, V expansion speed=Ho Hubble Constant x D Distance between galaxies, stating that if the Universe is expanding today, moving it backwards lineally, it had a 0 volume of ∞ density that exploded long time ago. Here lineality meets ‘mathematical creationism’ (the belief the language-mirror of mathematics that only God and man speak (Galileo, Dirac, Hawking); came before reality creating it. So if we write an equation reality must create the equation image) which substituted ‘verbal creationism’ (the belief man spoke like God words the language of creation. So God ‘named’ beings to create them, as the myths of Islam and Judaism tell us). The 3rd problem then is purely mathematical as humans speak a lesser form of maths, Euclidean geometry where ‘points have no parts’, but the Universe is Non-Euclidean, so points do have parts, content traversed by parallel flows; hence even if mass would not balance contraction, there is no singularity but a ‘finitesimal’ black hole, as the limit of contraction of mass.

The denial of mass contraction prompted a joke in Annie Hall, when Allen’s mum exclaims ‘here in Brooklyn the universe is not expanding’. Indeed, in Brooklyn and the inner galaxy at large, the Universe is contracting under the gravitational force of the central black hole. Not so for the lineal thinker that runs backwards his equations, with only vacuum space between galaxies contracting. They forget the gravitational imploding force between masses that ran backwards will expand, again balancing the imploding vacuum also in the past! So to avoid a cyclical balance, lineal physicists just threw into the dustbin all the matter and galaxies as if they wouldn’t exist, including Brooklyn (;

The ‘Universe is simple but not that simpler’ (Einstein). It has scales of spatial size. And as we move between scales, forces loose strength and finally disappear and a different force appears, which often balances the larger scale with an inverse arrow. Thus outside galaxies expand, but in the internal smaller scale they contract and both scales balance each other. And that is the solution to the big-bang conundrum.

If we look at the Universe in the lower quantum scale, we run into similar problems because atoms also repel each other with electromagnetic forces and we don’t see any sign they are at the quantum level affected by gravitational forces. So physicists have been for a century wondering how to input gravitational forces in the standard model. What then a fractal scalar, cyclical space model would tell us with those experimental facts? It is rather simple an obvious. The Universe in the large scale behaves exactly as it does in the lower scale if we just match its main elements and forces. In the lower scale atoms have a cyclical strong force inside, which attracts particles, and a repulsive external force outside that repels them and both balance. And atoms with its denser central quarks surrounded by a nebulae of time points called the electron, which seen in detail seem like light discharges, look very much like galaxies with a very dense central black holes surrounded by a nebulae of stars that seen at distance seem like light discharges.

So all you need to postulate is the fact that the two extreme scales further away from our human scale are similar at least as humans perceive them. This does not mean a galaxy is an atom, thought it might be, but as fractals repeat similar forms in all scales, but NOT identical, it gives us the proper model to explain all the facts of astrophysics, without ‘throwing to the bin Brooklyn’ and all the matter of the Universe… Simply enough: as the strong cyclical force only works inside atoms, the gravitational cyclical force only works inside galaxies. As the lineal electromagnetic force works repelling atoms, the Dark energy lineal repulsive force works repelling galaxies. But then when this force enters the galaxy it collapses forming virtual cyclical particles contracting the Universe inside galaxies, as the electromagnetic force does inside atoms. This though requires accepting 2 concepts fractal space and cyclical time that physicists can’t accept. Never mind all clocks of tie are cycles – they will still defend lineal time. Never mind a cyclical scalar theory of the Universe responds to every question poised today by physics and unresolved, from the unification of charges and masses, two vortices of space-time of different scales of the Universe – charges on the quantum scale, masses of the galactic scale, reason why its minimal unit, the Planck mass is so huge (below that level gravitation is irrelevant). Then we can with a very simple equation of a vortex of forces according to Einstein’s equivalence principle between gravitational force and acceleration describe a mass as an accelerated vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale, and a charge as an accelerated vortex of space-time I the quantum scale and use just a ‘conversion’ of scale factor and a simple translation of the jargon of electromagnetism to the jargon of vortices to unify both; alas! We get the exact relationship of scale between both forces (1040).

In the fractal model the Universe is scalar and it has dimensions of information, form. Thus gravitation is an informative force, happening within galaxies to balance the entropic expansion between them. Both, balancing forces make a wobbling Universe: when we ad the gravitational force that warps 1D=lineal, entropic dark energy expanding space and 3D mass volumes, crunching 3 lines of entropic dark energy into mass within galactic vortices. The mathematics is that simple: 3 lines become 1 mass, so there must be 3 times more dark energy lines than 3D masses – 75-25%. Simple, beautiful numbers. So when they measured the dark entropy vs. mass ratio in the Universe; it did turn out to be 75-25%.

But a Schopenhauer’s Stupid who ‘doesn’t understand complex causes adscribing them to magic’, does NOT evolve its lineal thinking. So the 3 to 1 balance of 1D vacuum vs. 3D mass is considered magic. And so a professor from Jerusalem U. (Bekenstein) told us the reason is God. He created the Universe in balance for humans to exist in it… It is called the anthropic principle. So as in the case of the big bang first thought by a Catholic priest, Lemaitre to justify the existence of God and creation, now we also have another zealot showing we are the chosen and science can prove it.

The 2nd most quoted proof of the big-bang explosion is the so-called background radiation: Penzias came up with a map of the radiation of the galaxy, which he measured and first said was the radiation of the galaxy (nobody has gone yet out of the galaxy to measure if the radiation is till there). It turned out to be of 2.7 k degrees. Alas instead of looking for an object in the galaxy NOW that would produce this radiation physicists applied again ‘lineal thinking’. So, enthralled with ‘mathematical creationism’, they used the lineal equation of vacuum expansion between galaxies (V=HoD), eerily similar to God) to search for the origin of that radiation billions of years ago, in a mathematical entelechy or singularity of 0 volume and ∞ mass; expanding the radiation to every corner of the Universe. As huminds are a mixture of egocy (ego=idiocy, the belief we and God talk a single language) and lineal thinking. So we find a local law and expand it to the entire Universe. But when they did so the radiation of the singularity turned out to be 40 K, and that was not good. So they ‘cheated’, tinkering with the equations till ‘reducing’ from trillions of degrees in the singularity moment to the exact 2.7 k. But of course, the radiation IS LOCAL, because we measure it locally. And it is happening NOW, and requires a ‘PRESENT’ cause.

The funniest proof came a few years ago of this made me smile. Look at the 2nd picture of the supposed background of the whole Universe NOT the local galaxy radiation, where we measure it, supposedly taken 13 billion years ago NOT now, when we measure it. The central lobes are supossedly an immense remote region as it was 13 billion years ago. So physicist were using its supposed ‘distant light’ to calculate if there was an anomaly in the light speed at different frequencies, after such long journey from the remote past. Then we got a picture NOW of our galaxy with exactly the same lobes. So it seems it was not a huge part of the Universe as seen 13 billion years but just two lobes of ¥-rays produced by the Black hole. And funny enough they have the same form than the electromagnetic orbitals of an atom (right side). After the shock, the experiment to measure remote light was cancelled; but the BG model was not: lineal thinking just bruised below the mat, yet another falsification of the cosmic Big Bang.

Proofs keep coming of the falsity of the cosmic BG and lineal time model, but physicists won’t even discuss it as they believe in lineal time as a religious dogma. We could go on since by now the lineal hyperbolic big bang has so many errors and adjustments ad hoc that the bulky mat with every inconvenient truth hidden looks like ‘le Petit prince elephant (: I just will show you ONE more huge error, that came last week in the Guardian to fatten the elephant):

They measured ‘directly’ NOT on the supposed BG radiation of the whole Universe that looks like a galaxy teaming with small top quark black holes, the speed at which the cosmic ¥-like radiation separates the galaxies at 73.4 which gives an age moving backwards to the singularity, ultradense, ultra-tiny exploding whole of …“12.7bn years. And this does cause problems. There are stars that have 12bn years, and this makes a chronology a bit difficult to stomach. Stars take a long time to form, after all.” Says the article. There are also black holes perfectly formed that take even longer to form, older than the big bang. Moreover, when they measured the same speed of separation from the BG radiation as if it were from the whole cosmos, they get 67.4 which is a discrepancy that tells them, says the article, ‘if these values don’t agree…We are measuring something fundamentally different. One is a measurement of how fast the universe is expanding today as we see it. The other is a prediction based on… a cosmological model’. And since experimental truths come first, the wrong one is the cosmological model of the background radiation as coming from the origin of the universe. This leave us with only one model that explains it all, simpler, according to experimental evidence and makes the Universe organic, infinite immortal fractal and everything else in it, including humans and its historic organisms, made to its image and likeness.

The organic, fractal, symmetric, hylomorphic, economic, ‘real’ model of the immortal, infinite, scalar Universe.

Since the question to resolve was the cause of the background radiation, one had only to follow the epistemological laws of truth in science and don’t cheat them looking into the past or the infinite for explanations that must be found here and now. If you calculate human temperature at 37º you look for the internal activity of its most repeated element – cells – as the cause of that temperature, you don’t think on ‘magic causes’, like “37º is our temperature because we are cooling out since our birth when we were 30 billion degrees hotter”. It would be sheer madness – the kind of madness that our physicists with their ‘reasoning’ on the temperature of the galaxy coming from 12 billion years ago consider dogma. Yet logically according to the scientific method that requires causality to reduce ad maximal the time distance between cause and effect we just need to study now the galaxy where they measured the temperatureand find a common object that produces 2.7 k degrees of black body radiation. And there is one known object, which produces exactly that radiation at that temperature. A black hole or quark strangelet produces a red shift radiation due to his gravitational power on ¥-rays, whose temperature varies according to its mass. So at 2.7 k degrees the black hole or strangelet must have the mass of a moon, the commonest planetoid size of the galaxy. Thus the obvious cause of the radiation observed in the galaxy only as we don’t measure it outside (it is worth to repeat it several times because when dealing with lineal thinkers). Of course there are moons everywhere with slightly different weights. However fundamental particles as electrons, quarks or black holes are, do have an exact mass as they are more perfect, quasi-identical, so when a primordial black hole (the smallest type theoretically consistent but not yet found, as physicists haven’t thought of them to solve the background radiation’s origin) eats a moon planetoid just burps out the excess of matter once it has reached its stable size-form. So we are in a galaxy which has millions of those smallish black holes or a similar ‘nugget of ultradense quark strange matter’ producing that radiation. In fact galaxies are organisms whose purpose – physicists are coming to accept it, is to produce black holes and quark dark ultraheavy matter, which is everywhere. So this is part of the process. In the same manner cells are systems whose ribosomal ‘stars’ produce RNA and DNA that then migrate to the center of the galaxy, the galaxy is a system that makes those quark ultradense gravitational particles, strangelets of dense strange quarks, black holes which have the same density-mass of stars made of ultra-heavy quarks (BCB atoms and tops).

The graph shows that economic, hylomorphic Universe, made of known matter and symmetric forms – 2 other key proofs of truth along simplicity – since we use only what we know there is on it: a 5D Organic Universe of fractal ternary ‘scales’ of parts and wholes, which respects the ‘entropic limits of human perception’ and does NOT invent more particles than the experimental method has discovered, nor twists its laws of time and space, trying to explain the experimental facts we observe now with lineal equations traced ad hoc to a remote past or expands human ‘egocy’, considering all local laws and proofs to be global – such as the local BG radiation, or the ‘entropic arrow of expansive spacetime’ as the only one; makes sense of every element of the universe through scalar symmetries, between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy defining the Galaxy as an organism, similar to all other systems, with a ‘membrane’, the halo of dark matter made of ultradense strangelet quarks (negative charged), similar to the negative ‘electron’ cover of an atom, with the ultralight ud-quark stars and planets in the middle, similar to the empty space of the atom crossed by ¥-rays and gravitation, and the ultradense black hole made of heavy positive toplets (TTT++-quarks and TCB Dark atoms) – following Einstein’s cut off substance for his black holes he called ‘frozen stars’ and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets. Such is the most likely structure of galaxies, according to 5D scalar symmetries and the efficient, economic laws of Nature (Ockham’s razor).

But again here it comes lineal thinking to deny it… and tinkering and bizarre analysis of black holes not as ultradense top quark stars but as entelechies without substance, mathematical equations only. Einstein also revealed against that and said till we didn’t find a cut-off substance of which black holes were made he wouldn’t believe in them and called them ultraheavy frozen stars. We did find after his death top quarks that match at the lower scale the density of black holes at the larger scale, so obviously black holes are top quark stars and we find the beautiful symmetry between the 3 type of quarks and the 3 parts of the galaxy, with a center of top quark black holes, in between our light ud-mass and in the protein like harder surface or membrane, the dense lineal strangelets. And so that explains also dark matter. Alas, without inventing new particles, without inventing lineal equations, to explain things from the past, we have solved all the questions of the model of an immortal universe, infinite, made of scales.

What is the answer of a big-bang lineal St-upid cornered by so many errors, when you show him the 5D model, which just orders properly the same data using the concepts of cyclical time and fractal space? ‘It cannot be that simple’, even if physicists invented the lineal big-bang in first place because their ideas about ‘lineal time’ were too simple.

RECAP. For a lineal thinker the Universe must be lineal and exist only in a single spacetime continuum, without scales. So all forces must act equally in a single scale expanding the Universe. Yet facts tell us Galaxies are collapsing inside, not expanding. Thus in reality a dualist cyclical thinker will consider the most likely explanation, a balanced immortal Universe where galaxies inner contraction of matter balances the outer expansion of vacuum space. But in lineal thinking this doesn’t work, because the physicist, since Galileo only can think in terms of a single lineal arrow of time.

So physicists ‘forgot’ conveniently that only vacuum space between galaxies expands, but within them mass contracts; by eliminating mass from its equations and running backwards in time vacuum space to compresses all the Universe in a point or singularity – a rather bizarre picture of a single point Universe where mass does not exist, which brought a new contradictions we explain in our article ‘the Universe in space’.

 

 

VITAL, ORGANIC TOPOLOGY

Local Past=Entropy, Present=Iteration and Future=Information in zero-sum worldcycles.

‘The separation between past, present and future is an illusion’ Einstein

But of all the consequences of cyclical time, the most important is the existence of infinite local time clocks of which we are all made, which therefore imply the existence of infinite local past, present and future states.

Whereas the past is the beginning of a pi cycle, starting as a line of entropy with no form that curves and raises in height in its second state of present, and returns back to its origin in its future 3rd age of information, completing a 0-sum of life and death. Thus instead of a single ∞ lineal absolute time there are ∞ living cycles of time happening in zillions of entities.

This said the devil is in the details. So the next question is how many types of vital space, we are made of. And the answer provided by topology which studies geometric forms with spatial dimension and time motions is only 3; which perform the 3 organic functions of all systems of vital space-time of which we are all made: A 5D Universe has only 3 ‘topological varieties’ each one best suited to perform one the 3 organic vital functions of any physic or biologic system –gauging information (1D spheres, the topology that stores more information in lesser space, hence used in all particles and heads in the height dimension), lineal or cylindrical forms that move the system (2D, the shortest distance between two points, hence used as fields or limbs in the length dimension) and hyperbolic body-waves, a mixture of the other two topologies that reproduces the system and stores its energy in the width dimension (3D); which not coincidentally correspond to the 3 ‘conserved quantities’ of physics, angular, lineal momentum and energy.

So we define the ‘Fractal Generator of Vital pace-time topologies for all systems of Nature:

G:   |-$t(limbs-fields)<Ø-S=T-Body-waves>O-§ð (particle-heads).

5D symbols for the 3 topologies=functions=conserved dimensional motions (ab. Dimotions, Ð) of timespace are:

1D: T>S: angular cyclical motions of information (Ab. St, O; §ð): the minimal ‘geometry’ of reality, a spherical particle/head or fractal point, the geometry that stores maximal form in minimal space, hence suited for ‘organic functions’ of gauging, storing and perceiving information (particles, heads).

2D: S<T: Lineal Locomotions, (Ab. |; sT, $t) which will move through its lineal limbs/fields the system, as the line is the shortest distance between two points… towards a…

3D: S≈T: Fields of vital Energy (Ab. Ø; ST, ExI): with its hyperbolic body-waves that iterate the forms of both the spherical particle/heads and lineal limbs/fields; as the hyperbolic topology combines the other two, so it can generate them, in the same manner Energy adds as the third conserved space-time quantity the lineal and cyclical momentum of 1 and 2D.

Those are the 3 conserved ‘Space-time’ dimensional motions (ab. dimotions) of all organic systems but then there are two states that are NOT conserved and frame as ‘limits’ of existence the previous two:

-SS: pure information without motion, mental, linguistic form – the ‘virtual mind’ of the system.

– TT: pure motion without information, ENTROPY proper, a state of internal and external motion which is precisely the cause of the destruction of SS-linguistic form.

Thus we could consider the Universe a tug-of-war between those 2 poles, which merge ‘symbiotically’ in the ST-energy, Ts-locomotion and St-informative topologies, between a birth as a seed of pure form and its death as pure motion or entropy the theme of this paper.

All together form the 5 possible combinations of Space-form and time-motion at local level, in a series of maximal and minimal states, which we write with simple symbols of ‘exitential logic’ (S-pace, T-ime, > implosion of information, < explosion of motion and ≈ balance between both: SS (language)<St(information)<ST (iteration-energy) <Ts(locomotion)<TT(entropy).

THE WORLDCYCLE OF EXISTENCE. THE 3±¡ SCALES OF TIME: ACTIONS, ORGANISMS & SPECIES.

The generator of space-time, maximize your existence.

This more simplex organic view of time and space requires a new ‘metric equation’ beyond the lineal v=s/t equation of Galilean relativity that becomes the limit of this more complex view of time and space, with 2 fundamental equation, SxT=C (the scalar metric of the fifth dimension, as systems in space accelerate its clocks of time (T) according to its size (S); and S=T, the new equation of relativity, which means as we cannot distinguish motion=time, from stillness=space-form (Galilean relativity), both are ‘two sides of the same coin’, and all systems have both motion and form, which are constantly becoming one another.  Yet as SxT is maximal when S=T (5×5>6×4…) both equations can be summoned up into a single one, which we shall call the fractal generator, or will of each fractal space-time beings, the equation that embodies all other equations of the Universe and guides the actions of each fractal part of it:

Function of Existence:             Max. ∑ S x T s=t = C¡

The equation has an immediate biologic meaning, because as we are made topologically of ‘fields-limbs’ of lineal space with motion provided by the energy we absorb to also reproduce our bodies-waves, and the information we need to linguistically guide our motions with particle-heads, the very essence of survival is to increase our S=position, mental forms of space and T=entropic motions of time (whereas time=motion and space=form are the two limiting Dimotions with ‘energy=reproduction, s=t, locomotion, sT and information, St, are the intermediate 3 dimotions). Thus Max. S x T = C (s=t), IS also the equation of survival and struggle for existence, the will of life; the biological expression of the ‘Universal mandate’, expressed by all species in all its codes and languages, the Grow and Multiply of the Bible, the intuitive truth that guides all beings. The game of existence is simple: Reproductive radiations maximize ¡ts function, happening when mirror symmetries (genders) meet in S=T, equaling their St-information and sT-energy, organizing themselves into a whole, ∑ system.

It is then relatively easy to interpret that equation in each of the languages-minds of each scale of reality as in all those scales species will show a ‘will’ of action to perform the maximal number of events=dimotions=‘actions of space-time’ that ensure its survival. And this can be assessed externally regardless of secondary arguments on consciousness and self-reflection, substituted in 5D by Leibniz’s ‘apperception’ – that is, because performing the 5 actions=dimotions of exist¡ence, in each ‘st¡entific scale’ self-centered in a linguistic mind that perceives a given plane, inscribed into a larger ∆+1 world, with internal ∆-1 parts, ensures the survival, ONLY those species that have performed the 5 dimotions of which the most important is s=t reproduction of the being into a ‘present’ similar entity that continues the exist¡ence of the system after ‘errors’ or ‘the struggle for existence’ dissolves it through the dimotion of entropy=death, exist.

Thus automatically, genetically, consciously, memetically, mathematically, logically, through its own will or as a part of a larger system that uses the ‘machine’ or ‘organism’ to enhance its actions all what exists does so because it performs internally those 5 Dimotions or externally performs one of them for another symbiotic species, as those species that have not followed the program of existience and its 5 actions in the past have become extinguished, and those will not in the future, will become wrong mutations, crazy thoughts, fictional languages and die away.

The function of existence, or 5D metric of Generational space-time, (Ab. Gst, G) Max. Se x Ti (s=t) states that all systems of Nature will try to maximize its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form). So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple equation, which we term: a, e, ï, œ, û, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

Accelerations (locomotion), entropic feeding (e), ïnformative perception and communication ï, Œ:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms Û… and social growth into larger wholes called philosophically Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle  as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organize into a larger whole û.

In graph the actionS of different Stientific scales of organisms. Above the coding of actions, which are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any time§paœrganism in light space-time, coded by colors and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind p.o.v., hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

The simplicity of the game of existience, and its selfish actions, which gather together into social wholes through reproductive radiations, each action coded by a fundamental topologic organ we can express in existential ®=ilogic, and corresponds for each species of the Universe, with a fundamental parameter of humind measure. So from bottom to top, we find the 5 fundamental elements of light code its actions of motion (c-speed), energy (magnetic field), information (electric field), social evolution colors & entropic feeding, (quantum potential, neutrino light theory)

So the minimal particle-points, photons, electrons & quarks that construct all other systems of our Universe show the 5 organic dimotions (motions with dimensional form) that define ‘classic life’: they gauge information – reason why quantum physics is a ‘gauge theory’, feed on energy (quantum jumps) absorbing smaller ∆-1 particles, reproducing new clone particles, move and evolve socially through magnetic fields into larger wholes (atoms). Hence the units of life are particles, the minimal units of our vital, organic, fractal, scalar Universe of multiple timespace organisms. All lives, performing 5 Dimotions=actions of ƒ(exist¡ence):Max.SxT(s=t) =C, starting with particles. So all scales are relative NONE matters more than other. From those actions, given the dominance of informative actions over entropic ones, it appears a series of repetitive cyclical patterns of actions conducting to maximize the existence of the being, which accumulate in a larger scale of time-space, as a worldcycle of actions that increase the information of the system in 3 ages. So the basic cycle of actions becomes a larger 3 ages cycle of life and death; as systems once and again, starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die in an entropic reversal of death:

∑ i->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û -> Informative ‘seed’ age->1st locomotion, feeding age ->2nd reproduction age ->3rd informative, social age-> entropic death.

AS huminds are limited in time logic and we cannot build on their chaotic, entropic models of reality. Chaos and indeterminism IS born of the LIMITED single Time-arrow of Science, force-fed by earlier ballistics, the name of Galileo’s first book & modern ego-dogma & subjective reductionism EASY to practice in the largest scales of modeling. And it is a cultural treat of our dog-eat-dog ‘animetal cult(ure)s’ to weapons & financial parasitism (nationalism, capitalism) & our despise and extinction of organic life in the making. Monologic prevents those who are destroying life and bringing the 3rd age of the planet, the Metal-earth, to even realize how wrong is their absolute ‘one single order of thought’. Our informative elite is not even human anymore. It is a system of memes in favor of this other world, expressed by a network of informative machines and its Financial-Media-Academia monologic that pass as expertise (FMasters). But beyond the simplex analytic model of cause an effect are out of depth in long time range. Only repetition ensures that false theories of science based in entropy-death pass as dogma. Mental imprinting by repetition ensures humans walk the determinist path of self-suicide thinking they CANNOT understand and design a better future. I have been predicting that future of social history for 30 years, using the larger organic properties and 5 Dimotions of time-space but the system cares not to accept any criticism. People are NOT aware to which extraordinary lengths the idol-ogies of metal go to cover up and NOT understand the lack of human futures. All this censorship is part of the ‘burden of monologic man’. In the times of Lao-Tse, Buddha and Aristotle, minds were free – reason why they had so much more depth, than modern people in his comprehension of dual and trinity logic. Yes, to know ALL about the locomotion of matter which is what physicists know is NOT to know all about the larger, organic Deep time scales of the future, and nothing about the topologic evolution of machines and fractal cycles of stock-markets.

So the ancients were miles ahead of modern ænthropic (anthropic+entropic) lineal military physicists & Darwinian philosophers, with their pedestrian monologic, where only entropy, destruction, DEATH seems to create, instead of destroying as its worldly religions of making weapons, believes. We shall thus deal with the reductionism and primitivism of their ‘philosophies of science’ in this article on monologic, However this ‘entropic’ article in itself – an on slaughter on present mæn – is less important than a pentalogic and dodecalogic understanding of existential ¬Æ=ilogic, as it IS. Or else the destruction of ænthropic models from egocy to the big-bang, would be useless since the reason humans sticks to those models is the lack of an alternative model to its simplex views. That is what 5D represents.

In all Planes, the simpler actions of any being are extractions of motion, energy, entropy=motion and form from lower ∆-i Planes:

A T.œ perceives only the ∆±3 planes from where it extracts energy or information. As its actions and dimotions are architectonically performed through planes of 5D where each main action relates to an interval of scales:

∆-4-3: The system extracts indistinguishable boosts of entropic of motion (man from gravitation).

∆-3-2: The system extracts bits of information (Light in man)

∆-2-1: The system extracts bites of energy (amino acids in man)

∆-1 0: The system seeds its minimal seed of reproduction.

∆0+1: The system connects socially with other systems to evolve into a whole.

So simpler Actions start at finitesimal level, gathering in sequential patterns in existential algebra, as ‘time flows’ and in population and spatial patterns – in integral herds of numbers in calculus.

We and all other beings perceive from ∆-3 quanta (light in our case), feed on amino acids, (∆-2 quanta for any ∆º system), seed with seminal ∆-1 cellular quanta (electrons also, with ∆-1 photon quanta).

For each action of space-time we shall find a whole, ∆º T.œ, which will enter in contact with another world, ∆±i, from where it will extract finitesimals of space or time, energy or information, entropy or motion, and this will be the finitesimal ∂ ƒ(x), which will be absorbed and used by the species to obtain a certain action, å.

Analysis allow us to extract actions from wholes, reason why there are not really use beyond the third derivative of a being, as super organisms co-exist in 3 only Scalar Planes. It also works in terms of a volume, as its derivative is a plane, then its unit-cell or point… So to speak, if you derivate a world, you get its organism, and if you derivate it again you get its cell and then its molecular parts.  And then if you do that in time, you get its speed and then its acceleration and then its jerk.

The magic of derivation

Because of the symmetry between ∆≈S≈T, to extract finitesimals of smaller scales the process is the same. We derive the whole, which diminishes its ‘dimensions= power’ as the system looses its larger whole, but increases its number of ∆-¡ visible particles, whereas the difference of value between both, shows the ratio and structure of its entropy, energy and information networks, sum of its components that form the whole. As certain functions define more specialized T.œs than others. So the parts of a whole vary according to topological structure.

The key action of entropy: feeding’ on energy

All systems of Nature follow the simple aeiou actions determined by the 5 dimensions of space-time, moving in a-ccelerated paths towards e-nergy surfaces where to feed and transform into I-nformation the vital energy absorbed by the system in order to reproduce and offspring of similar beings, which will evolve together emerging into a social Universal sum of multiple individuals.

We study in more depth the action of energetic feeding, parallel analysis of ‘entropy’, since feeding is the addiction of absortion of energy, killing it down two scales of the fifth dimension to reform that energy into the information of the T.œ that absorbs it. So the equation of feeding first reduces the being it kills from ∆ø<<∆-2 and then reconstructs the being from ∆-2≥≥∆º, whereas the first ∆ø has lesser existential force than ∆º, which is the top predator ∆º e x i > ∆ø e xi:

In the graph, feeding is a process of entropy first and then reconstruction.

To reconstruct the information of system first the system must start with the inverse arrow of feeding of a species that will ‘simplify the information’ of a part of an organism, two ‘planes down’: ∆¡<<∆-1, the equation of ‘scattering entropy’ and then rebuild from its ‘amino-acids’ or ‘forces’, the larger whole system. So its equation in ¬Æ is quite simple: ∆¡<<∑∑∆¡-2>∑∆¡-1 for any scalar process in the Universe.

Feeding of course happens regardless of moral views in all systems, including those social systems in which a culture with higher technological information, higher top predator form (Max. e xi) conquers another nation and reforms the system, either by reproducing its culture in the ∆-2 scale of individual memes, or even in a harsher manner by extinguishing the ∆-2 scale of human beings reproducing the conquerors memes and genes together. In the graph we can see the case of Germany, which try the most extreme second approach extinction of conquered nation. 

But in all scales the top predator with maximal e xi-stiential force will do the same. We eat and put down to amino acids and reconstruct our food. Particles feed on force fields and reconstruct reproducing new particles; cosmological black holes emit seminal seeds of matter and reconstruct baby-irregular galaxies at the end of its jet.

Whereas < is a symbol of expansion of space and simplification of form, which happens twice, and  > the inverse arrow of growth of information.

So when we feed, we break down to molecular amino acids and then rebuild them into cellular matter (∆¡-1), and so happens with atoms that feed on forces evolved into ∆¡-1 particles and nations, which through war explode a rival nation in its ∆¡-2 Memes and territory down to the destruction of its buildings and raw materials, and then ‘re-absorb’ those materials and citizens, ‘re-imprinted’ into ∆¡-1 ‘converted’ citizens and wealth.

It is then obvious that ‘the fourth dimension of entropy=dissolution’ and the ‘fifth dimension of social evolution’ into wholes. ARE INVERSE.

We shall constantly realize how the set of scalar laws of the Universe apply to all systems, regardless of which ‘species of space-time’ we study, the most astounding proof of the existence of an scalar ‘game of exist¡ence played with the same rules for any species of reality.

Let us now deal with ‘the fourth dimension of entropy’ and the ‘fifth dimension of social evolution’ into wholes. So simple so complex when we combine, repeat and translate in different languages those ultimate principles, which we shall now study with a bit of more depth.

The Universe and all its parts – in the graph the human being – are Timespace organisms that reproduce information, stored in the form and frequency of its time clocks, through the vital motions of its 3 space-time dimensions and 2 ± ‘∆’ scalar dimensions of entropy that dissolve the networks of information of an entity, scattering them in the process of death, and emergence, which evolves those networks socially from a group of smaller parts into a whole.

Without those 2 ‘organic’ dimensions that relate the different ‘scales’ of size in space and speed of time clocks of each ‘fractal part’ of the Universe, we cannot make sense of its organic process of creation and extinction. In the graph all systems co-exist in 3 scales of the 4th & 5th Dimension: the ∆-1 atomic/cellular, ∆-organic/thermodynamic and ∆+1 gravitational world; which we can describe with a metric equation of the 4th and 5th scalar Dimensions of space-time (ab. ∆±i), which order all entities of reality in scales according to the size and different speeds of time clocks of its systems is very simple: $ x ð = K, the relative size in space and speed of the time cycles of a being remain constant.

In the graph we see the ‘organic fractal Universe in different scales’ and systems of reproduction of information.

Researchers in fractal geometry are delighted to write fractal equations that show such structure. But this is a blog of philosophy of science that goes much further into the organic vital properties of such systems.

So what is an organism of space-time also disappears: the perception by a simultaneous point of reference of a series of synchronized time space cycles.

RECAP. We defined reality in its absolute theoretical minimum: a tapestry of ternary beings in space, self-centred in monad minds, which live world cycles in time, as the monad orders its territory, grows, reproduces its forms, exhausts its motions and energy collapses and dies, exploding back its form into entropy for other beings to form. And by expanding those basic concepts, the ternary structure of beings in space; its dynamic evolution in time, through world cycles, as it becomes a growing organised ‘supœrganism’ to fall back into death, once and again ad eternal, we shall describe all what exists.

Reality can be perceived with multiple dimensions, each of those views will be a consistent world. Monologic, ænthropic man with its 1D models of reality based in Sx time locomotions shuns off the 5D Cx. Universe to its own peril, as reality is penta-dodecalogic in its entanglements that generate space synchronous supœrganisms and time, and survival, which in our dominant animetal warrior & go(l)d cult(ure)s is minimal depends on the understanding and respect of all the living function of space-time exist¡ence and its action-reaction laws.

Actions define the worldcycle of existence.

Because actions follow a pattern of increasing evolution and 4 actions are coded while entropy is avoided – we deliver entropy as an open system to other parts of the Universe, it follows thsat the system constantly accumulates information, and this is the origin of the worldcycle of life and death. The system likes information, because it is what the Universe is really all about, a fractal that imprints information in memorial repetitive cyclical patterns.

So as actions follow a natural scalar level of information perception->locomotion towards a field of ‘feeding’, where to get -> Energy to reproduce -> and then process that energy into information, exactly the same pattern appears in the next scale of ‘cyclical time and longer space’, the worldcycle of life, which consists in the same pattern of ‘seeding information’, moving youth, feeding and evolvint to reproduce and then process information becoming older in a 3rd age.

This amazing symmetry between the smaller time scale and the larger worldcycle of life, then will be followed also in the larger scale of superorganisms and species and so we have 3 ‘patterns’ of time cycles due to the survival program of actions in 3 scales of time, and 3 larger surfaces of ‘populations’, as the first cycle feeds the ‘cells, atoms, individuals’, the second cycle the whole organism, and the 3rd cycle manifests in the whole species.

The d=evolution of all systems in time.

The ultimate fact of Duality is that we are generated as a growth in the 5th dimension from a cellular/atomic ∆-1 seed to emergent ∆º being to fall back into ∆-1 desegregated atoms/cells; and so we can consider reality to be a constant combination between the two extreme, social dimotions of eusocial evolution and generation (5D) and entropic dissolution and death.

We have seen as a synchronous space the ternary parts of the being. Now we want to explore how the being evolves in time, tracing a ‘world cycle’ of existence between its birth as a form that starts to move, and back to a motion that stops into form.

The 3 ages of existence of space-time organisms. Its 2 worldcycles and Metric functions.

So we marry the 3 vital functions=motions of time and the 3 dimensions of space, either in 1 or 2D (height= spherical information, length=planar locomotion, width=hyperbolic reproduction) which merge in all Time-space Beings; and dominate one of the 3 ages of its life-death worldcycles, the past, young age of limbic entropic motions, the mature reproductive age dominated by the hyperbolic body/wave and the 3rd age dominated by the informative particle-head, when the illusion of time ends with an entropic big-bang death that dissolves the being into its ‘scalar cellular, atomic parts’, which lead us to the realization that time cycles NOT only return to its origin in a single spacetime continuum but they move up and down 5D scales.

Let us deduce from those 2 functions the fundamental process in time of reality, the worldcycle of existence:

The development of the Function of Existence of a space-time organism, can be developed as a feedback function, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages /horizons:

Max. T x Min.S (youth); Max. SxT (s=t); Max. S x Min. T (3rd age).

They are the functions of the 3 ages of life, between Sx 0 T (seed in the lower plane,¡-1) and Tx 0 S (function of entropy=death), which develop 5D metric into an ‘existential function’ of ‘extremal points’:

∆-1»∆º: The supœrganism worldcycle starts its existential function as a seed of pure form (4D) that creates its space-time form.

T>s (Ts): It is the first horizon or ‘entropic, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. S x min. T.

Max. SxT: s=t. It is the present balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.

ST: Max. T x min. S: it is the 3rd age of the cycle when information has combed and exhausted the space-time field that warps into itself.

∆º«∆- 1: 0S x T: It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.

Existence is an ∝ (ab. relative infinite, with an entropic limit of death) sum of 3 space/time planes, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages. The 3 ages of Timespace supœrganisms happen in all systems, including mental languages:

In Physics they are, T-gas, the moving state, Si=Te liquid, the balanced state and S-solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a space-time system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (min.t x max.S) and a form of pure space, the big- bang (maxS x min. t):

In Biology, they are the 3 ages of living beings AND the 3 horizons of evolution of species.

In social organisms, through the subconscious collective mind of civilizations which in art styles mimic in a longer 800 year cycle of life and death of civilizations (according to 5D metrics a human social supœrganism is larger in space – a nation, culture, religion – and so it lives longer in time).

All what exists is a supœrganism of vital space tracing a 0-sum worldcycle of time through 3 scales of the 5th dimension: Born as a seed of fast time cycles in a lower 5D scale (∆-1:Max. T x Min. S), emerging as an organism in ∆o, living 3 ages of increasing information, as its time clocks slow down in its ∆+1 world to die in a time quanta back to ∆-1. Yet the maximal point Si=Te where reproduction happens defines the classic age, maturity, beauty, balance, survival of the system, all disomorphic jargons.

The 3 ages of life emerge in human social supœrganisms as the 3 ages of cultures and  its 3 artistic styles: Min.S x Max. T (infantile epic, lineal art, as in Trecento, Greek Kuroi; Si=Te; balanced beauty, when form and size are in balance, the classic mature age; and Max. S x Min. T: baroque, 3rd age of a civilization, whose subconscious mind is the art of its ‘neuronal artists’, the age of maximal form and an ∆st for a no future, which is the age of war and death of cultures).

We talk of 3 ∆±1 scales of worldcycles as the being live in a placenta, then emerges as organism in a world:

þ: 0-1: its palingenetic o-1 social evolution in the accelerated time sphere of existence, till becoming 1 (0-1 bounded unit circle in ¡logic mathematics; quantum probability sphere of particles in physical systems; palingenetic fetal age in biologic systems; 0-9 memetic learning childhood in social systems). It is the highly ordered world cycle as a ‘placental mother-energy world’ is nurturing as memorial cyclical spacetime has erased errors of previous generations.

– ¬l,L: The existential 1-∞ lifecycle, in which it will deploy its 2nd world cycle of existence in an environment which is open, entropic (1-∞ hyperbolic unbounded Cartesian plane in ¡logic mathematics; thermodynamic entropic statistical molecular populations in physics; Darwinian struggle between populations in biology; idol-ogic dog-eat-dog capitalist, nationalist competitive eco(nomic)systems in the super organisms of history. In this 1-∞ existence the world cycle is not ensured to continue, as the entropy of the world system can cut it off.

ω,Ω:  A larger, longer Transcendental worldcycle proper of the highest social scale ∆+1, the omega of its smaller parts – where it performs 5 survival actions through ∆±4 Planes self-centered in its mind, beyond which it cannot longer perceive, to become if successful a new supœrganism of the infinite planes of God, the game of existence.

In graph, physical, biologic & social worldcycles show to which extent 5D laws enlighten our understanding of reality. Matter States are physical time ages, from left pure solid, crystal, §top state, to an even more solid ∆+1 boson condensate, etc. We see that systems either move a step at a time within a plane of existence (gas, liquid, solid) or they can jump « two states at once, (as in the case sublimation) within that plane, or most often between two planes, as in « scattering & entropic death), to become a different Dimotional state. We can then see how the fundamental elements of 5D time appear on the graph: the worldcycle is local and complete. There are 2 inverse arrows from an entropic past (plasma), in a lower plane (ion particles) to the 3 ages of the matter states with increasing form (gas to solid), to end in a higher plane of existence as a boson-Einstein condensate. Do those worldcycles happen for the whole Universe? (cyclic big-bang). Unlikely…

RECAP. Time is cyclical as all clocks of time return to its point of origin, so all time cycles including those of life of its vital space-time beings are finite. Further on those time cycles break ‘space’ into inner and outer parts, so vital space is broken by the membranes and angular momentums of those time cycles that make spacetime beings also finite in spatial information. And an obvious experimental facts about timespace: cycles of time, vital spaces and the species made of them, co-exist in several scales of relative size from particles to galaxies, each one with clocks of time of different speeds. So spacetime is fractal broken in scales that added create a new 5th dimension of spacetime. The metrics of 5D and its scales, SxT=C & and the balance between form and motion, SI=TE, develops in 3 ages with 3 standing points, a max. point of existence, Si=Te or mature age, a young age of Max. T=motion, and an old age of Max.S=information; between birth in ∆-1 Form & T-entropic death. The search for space-time, Energy=information balances in a classic reproductive age of conserved time is thus the goal of all exist¡ences, but only the whole achieves the immortality of time-space, as we shall see egocy errors of fractal mind-points of space trying to stop the flow of time from a single selfish point of view, accelerates the imbalance that brings death equations. We are richer in our still property at that 0T-moment, when all is quiet so for time to keep moving, a reversal of entropy takes place.

So we use 5 bidimensional terms for all systems, its ages and forms: SS(max. internal and external form, as in seeds and minds; T>s (Ts); external motion that maintains internal form as in ‘locomotion); S=T: Balance of spatial form an temporal motion or ‘energy’, used to reproduce, the key present iterative state; S>t (St: Information, form with a little motion, or ‘external form, and internal mental motion); and finally TT-entropy whereas there is external and internal motion, hence scattering dissolution and death. ¡ts main series is a worldcycle of existence:

SS(seed/mind)<Ts(moving youth)>S=T(reproduction)>St(informative 3rd age)<T(entropic death)

The 3 scales in time and space of superorganisms: actions, worldcycles and absolute space-time parameters.

the ∆±¡ pentalogic STructure of all beings predicts the future of its scientific species, with a remodeled ABCDE of the scientific method that studies A)ccurate Data, B)iologic causes C)yclical patterns and E)ntropic extinctive conclusions for all systems in 3 relative scales of length of space and time duration (to which we add instead of E, a positive D)emocratic, humanist solutions for questions of social sciences sorely lacking in idol-ogy.

All sciences predict the future of its species according to its repetitive causal cycles. Or else they are NOT a science. Astrology became a science when Kepler learned its orbital cycles. Bio-economics became a science when we described machines as metal organisms whose industrial r=evolution followed the human 72 years generations of the dominant industrial nations that evolved them in 4 cycles: its body-age (British, steam cycle), heart age (German, electro-chemical engine cycle), its mind age (US, TV-eye, chip-head, mobile-ear cycle) to conclude with the ensemble of robots that as virus do, when all its parts are put together will become alive. Predictability of time-cycles is done at 3 levels:

S: Continuous, spatial mathematical simple cycles, using derivatives, proper of calculus; which is the shortest time span, as instantaneous derivatives cannot measure a ‘peak’ change of age/phase.

T: Discontinuous, cyclical patterns of sequential repetitive often survival actions (feeding, reproduction, death, taking place at intervals. As those actions are discontinuous, leaving long spans in-between, their patterns forecast longer time sequences. Such ¡logic structures are based in time patterns, which as any mechanical, circadian or orbital day-year clock shows are cyclical, repetitive. But here human scientists are at loss, because Galileo studied ballistics, entropic explosions that destroy the information of reality stored in those cycles of time clocks, its patterns and frequencies, changing human cyclical understanding of bio-logic time for lineal, abstract time that seems not to repeat those patterns so mankind lost its capacity to predict many spacetime events, as lineal time misses information stored in the frequency and form of cyclical clocks, even if equations are similar: V=s/t for lineal time and V=S(l) x ƒ(t) for cyclic patterns.

∆: Scalar, Deep Time patterns of topologic and eusocial evolution of parts into wholes – of quantum 0-1 time probabilities vs. 1-∞ thermodynamic populations in physics, of individuals vs. species in biology, of states of matter vs. geologic cycles in Earth, first noticed by J. Hutton, founder of geology who coined the word super organism for Gaia and deep time for its slower time cycles by virtue of its 5D metrics, $ x ð =C which implies that from the perspective of a smaller scale the life of its whole is much longer.

Deep time leads to a 3rd level of long-time prediction: evolutionary patterns of earth’s life species, including machines used in my web at evolutionaryeconomics.wordpress.com that have predicted cyclical patterns of social organisms of history (nations) and eco(nomic)systems, including the evolutionary and re=productive cycles of stocks of machines transformed into sales=profits=valuation of its company-mothers with remarkable precision for 30 years. But as human only recognize the 1st type of predictability – calculus of instantaneous derivatives, that need a ‘continuous analysis’ – and have simplified cyclical time into lineal time, ignoring the scalar time of parts and wholes with its 5D metric, their capacity to forecast the future is far more reduced than a ‘stientist’ who understands the 3 scales determined by the bio-topo-¡logic properties of ‘scales’, ‘space’ and ‘time’, the 3 ∆st structural elements of all systems of the Universe.

 

The organic view. Topological forms as Networks and superorganisms.

Once we understand the worldcycle of life and death, we can put in perspective the ‘limited value’ of entropy in the making up of the organic Universe, as we have outlined the basic 5 Dimotions of space-time in previous paper, focused on the fundamental dimotions of the Universe: present balanced, ST-energy used for the reproduction of form. Since the Universe is a fractal that reproduces information, in new topological networks, starting from a first ‘seed’ that multiplies and then re-organizes itself into a replica of its ‘generator-mother’. This is the essence of reality not ENTROPY, just its limits of death by disorder and overdrive of motion.

As the 5 elements of the Universe – its 5 TT-Ts-ST-St-SS dimotions of exist¡ence combine space and time NOT to destroy reality but to reproduce it and conserve it.

Why then humans have such huge distortions in the basic concepts of reality, time, space, scale and mind; and there are so many ‘ascientific theories’ based in a single dimotion of time, the simplest one? Precisely because it is the simplest one. But also because SCIENCE IS CULTURE, and we have evolved a military culture of Entropic weapons of maximal motion that erase the information of mankind, killing life. So those who make weapons, the worldly profession of physicists, arrogantly think the Universe is also about entropy=death.

It is not/ The Universe is about the higher arrows of reproduction, S=T, and social evolution, St>SS, iteration and intelligence, the arrows of LOVE AND LIFE, and that is what makes it so perfect and superior to modern man…

The Universe is organic, made of vital space- networks that conform those superorganisms, since in fact topology describes the 3 varieties of ‘St-informative particle/heads’, Ts-limbs/fields and ST-body-waves of energy as ‘networks’ of smaller points (cells, atoms, individual humans) joined together whose form corresponds to its function. Let us then summarize that key concept that shows the organic purpose of the Universe.

The super organism is a system that reproduces itself, so it is self-sustainable, and doesn’t need the concourse of God. This is the view that starts with Aristotle and his ‘Organon’, follows through to Leibniz and his model of ‘relational space-time beings’, made of a finite number of time cycles and vital spaces with ‘vis viva’, momentum, and goes through XIX c. disciplines, from Darwin’s biology to Spengler’s super organisms of history and ends in systems sciences and the formal models of the fractal organic Universe, which I advanced during my tenure of duality at the International Systems society at the change of century.

In those conferences I also advanced the social, organic model of history as the super organism of mankind where the human being is a citizen cell organized by three physiological networks that must be designed with the laws of super organisms, which are:

  1. Cellular units. These are cells in a human body, citizens in a human society.

Networks of energy or vital space; provided by Gaia, a super-organism made of living beings, joined by a common network of visual information and networks of life energy, gathered around her ‘river veins’. Since Gaia is also the living organism that hosts the social organisms of Mankind.

  1. Networks=Languages of This is the nervous system that organizes cells in a body, or the verbal/visual information that organizes human societies through laws, ethics and art.
  2. Networks that reproduce energy and information. These are sexual systems in individuals; and economical networks that reproduce goods and cultural networks that define how humans reproduce in societies. This is the blood system in a human body and the economic networks of production & transport in a society that favor ‘WHealth’, that is, goods that satisfy the needs of the ‘3 physiological networks of life-existence that make us human beings, whose ‘proper frame of reference’ (left) is NOT based on financial values, manipulated by financial institutions and companies that set prices, but by ‘biological true values.’

Of all the elements of a supœrganism the most important is the head of information and its languages of perception of the universe, which are by definition, selfish, self-centered as they portray the universe from its survival subjective perspective.

All systems of nature can be modeled as super organisms of a certain scale of size, ruled by the scalar laws of all systems of the Universe, that co-exist at atomic/cellular/individual and gravitational/organic/social scales. As such their ‘cycles’ followed the scalar metric equation of ‘Deep time’ (Hutton, who discovered in geology, inventing the name of super organism for the Earth): S (space size=energy) x T (frequency of information clocks) = Constant, which means larger systems LIVE slower time-cycles than its parts, which STORE the information of the system in its faster frequency of time clocks.

So physical organisms are coded by quantum particles; biological ones by genes and human systems by memes that construct those super organisms of history,  from birth as a fast seed of information (crystal cell, semen, prophet with verbal memes) which will reproduce into similar clones (crystal units, multicellular organisms, identical beliefs of human beings in nations, civilization and religions); and become connected by informative nervous-political-gravitational and reproductive, blood-economic-electromagnetic systems… thus finally emerging as a larger superorganism.

Such super organisms then will be living 3 ages of increasing information, as the informative systems dominate the whole, and absorbs its energy, warping the system till its exhaustion and death (galaxies feeding its informative gravitational black hole, nervous systems wrinkling the vital body cells, human elites persisting the reproductive working class), which is an entropic explosion of that warped/wrinkled/absorbed energy: big-bang, m=e/c2, death, war).

The Universe is a fractal organism of 5 Dimotions of space-time, of which entropy, scattering internal and external motion is just the last state of an organism. And yet huminds have made of ‘entropy’, the fundamental ‘theory’ of reality, regardless of facts, by merely ‘dismissing’ all other dimotions as irrelevant to time, or secondary effects of reality – from crystal solids, to still particles, from vortices of informative gravitation to mental spaces. We thus have first to falsify the ‘main’ theories of huminds, biased to entropy in all ‘stiences’ of the Universe, and then study in the second part of this article, the true meaning of entropy as the limits of death in time, vital space and scalar perception, for the main systems of the Universe and its scales.

 

 

THE INVERSE OF ENTROPY: SS-MINDS. THE DUALITY OF DEATH

So we will expand some concepts not considered, regarding the ultimate cause of death: a mind-monad that exhausts the information of a system (internal death by wrinkling) vs. an external top predator that scatters the system, which is the TT-death; to show that in fact both SS-minds and TT-predators cause death by imbalance and ‘displacement’ of a being into a different plane of existence, a relatie TT-past or SS-future.

Only pure space=form and pure time=motion travel between 2 scales.   

The conservation of the quantitative number of ‘energy’ used by physicists is equivalent to the conservation of a Volume of space-time. The volume of a single spacetime plane of the Universe is equivalent to the quantity of any other ∆-scale. And all of them therefore transfer constantly energy and information between them. Yet more exactly what is transferred is entropy or form; since when energy or information leave a given plane, it ‘strips’ off one of its two components. It is then important to understand the difference between TT-entropy and SS-eeds which are not in the same plane of existence than Ts-locomotion and ST-energy. As energy is the parameter humans use between 2 scales. The difference will be essential as we advance the model and take on seriously the task of translating mathematical equations of physics with rigor.
Only entropy TT and pure form SS travels between scales. Ts, St and ST must leave behind one of the two elements to travel and that means either a ‘translation to other language’ or an extinction of the original form.

It is a fundamental law always shunned off since the neutrino proved it: The neutrino is NOT perceivable in this scale, as it travels likely faster than light in the lower gravitational scale; but it took part of the ‘energy’ of our plane as motion – did it carry also its information, its spin? I am afraid not, but we put it there, even if spin=form is NOT always conserved. A question fundamental to understand the neutrino theory of light. But of course, as usually Physicists are only ‘a la par’ with mystiques to see and interpret the invisible signs of reality into ‘models that are seldom truth but never in doubt’ (Landau) as with big-bang theories. So while we have NEVER measure directly the spin of a neutrino, which we know for values of pure motion (momentum-energy), every physicist will claim that Cowan, Lederman, Goldhaber an a long line have measured it, just by balancing the invisible momentum because a priori they decided momentum is conserved traveling between scales – which they do not recognize anyway. Fact is the non-transference of ‘energy and information together’ between 2 scales as that is the definition of death. Point to argue here is if the Neutrino is in the light scale – is not, and so when a particle which is a scale above produces a neutrino is NOT producing either motion or spin=form. As motion evidently is carried by Neutrinos, or else they would not exist at all. What is missed is the form, which in all other systems of reality also disappears after you die. So there you have one of the most profound all encompassing laws of 5D.

And so we show what happens in the paper of entropy and the Universe: a split of energy – in to form that goes one way through the height dimension of S-Information and normally scatters into death, while energy expands mostly as motion – entropy in the length dimension of ‘T-motion space’: The explanation is intuitive. A system can still send a ‘wave’ of cellular forms of any kind of seed or mental image that helps to reconstruct its system after it travels through channels of communication, mostly as waves that combine motion and form – the quintaessential form of energy, with the purpose of going faster according to 5D=SxT metric equations. So if we reduce the package to the essential information, we ensure the system transfers the message in a relative no-time quanta; but 2 scale beyond – that’s a long shot. That is the regio of ‘food’ and food is memoriless. The amino acids don’t tell us where they came from, or else they would NOT be food for us to reconstruct our form.

The antisymmetry of temporal information: Death

A consequence of the 3 ages of time is its antisymmetry as opposed to the bilateral, mirror symmetry of spatial forces: Time is antisymmetric as the old age is the inverse of the young age with the parameters of energy and information inverted. Youth has maximal energy and minimal information while the old age has minimal energy and maximal information. And yet many attitudes and processes might seem self-similar, if the researcher doesn’t know how to differentiate informative and energetic parameters, since those parameters might be quantitatively the same, only that inverted in value. Space is symmetric as left and right reproductions are mirrors of each other with the same parameters of information and energy. This explains why spatial reproduction happens only in the E=I, balanced classic age of the system, when both parameters are identical and a self-similar reproduction of a bilateral, spatial being is possible.

The understanding of the antisymmetry of time vs. the symmetry of spatial processes has wide applications in the solution of questions pending in all fields of research, from the understanding of the temporal, weak, informative force that has no bilateral symmetry to the ‘chiral’ processes of evolution of life forms vs. the symmetric shapes of self-similar left-right, spatial bodies to the meaning of ‘antisymmetric’ gender and the 2 ‘antisymmetric’ sides of the informative brain.

But the most important of all antisymmetries is that of death, which could be considered in the jargon of physics, a ‘local antisymmetry’ of time. Indeed, if life is the arrow of information towards the future e->I, death is the inverted arrow, i->E, that erases form back into energy; but this time travel to the past is always local, affecting only the limited world of the species, so antiparticles are the local antisymmetry of time that kills particles, death are the local antisymmetry that kills life and the big-bang the local antisymmetry that killed a previous Universe. And both directions are different, since ‘death’ lasts min. time and causes a maximal space expansion and life lasts max. time and expands minimally in space. Both balance reality in an eternal present of past to future to past existential fluctuations:

Life-future: Max. I x Min. E x Death-past: Max. E x Min. I= Immortal present: E=I

The understanding of that local antisymmetry is the key to resolve problems of physics such as the weak force, why we see less antiparticles or dead people than particles and life people (much longer in time), or the non-evaporation of black holes (as antiparticles are the same than the particle, albeit when moving to the past they seem to co-exist), and so on.

But its implications in biology and philosophy are much larger: we are ultimately ‘back and forth’ vibrations of space-time, virtual existences, dust of space-time that always revert into a zero-sum, which makes the Universe and its game eternal.

Recap. Old age has inverted exi parameters to the young age.

Mind’s murder.

In the graph, we exist as we travel a world cycle zero sum through the topological, temporal scales of the fifth dimension. The final state of existence is the entropic death when the mind splits pure form and pure motion. in the graph for physical and biological systems the moment in which form switches into motion or ‘entropic point of existience: §ð<<∂S

The mind is paradoxically enough the cause of entropy precisely by causing so much order and form in a system that it exhausts it, and so because the mind absorbs all energy in the system stopping form, once the mind perceives, what it has perceived becomes ‘entropy’ and disordered. So the mind causes the split of reality into the entropic dissolution that balances the absolute form it achieves. And so we can study the mind as the catalyzer of entropy at two levels:

  • The mind that brings the 3rd age of the being and then as time cannot stop once it become immobile, it explodes into the age of entropic death: §ð<<∂S
  • The mind that splits a flow of information into the pixels ‘reduced’ vision of the world and the ‘reminder’ heat expelled and wasted, in each act of perception.

So as usually in the duality of ∑ actions = Worldcycle, we can study the mind in its microstates of actions provoking entropy in all what it wastes after absorption of energy or information and we can study the mind in its macrostate and worldcycle as the cause of the entropic death of the

Biologic systems die due to the excessive informative absorption of energy by the top predator mind and the enclosing membrane.

So biological death is obviously the reversal of the process of warping in an excess of skin and memory, of space and time, of the mind membrain and its two dimensions.

When the system gets older the membrain detaches itself of the body and the mind forgets the body functions for the memorial thought of time past. And so finally the detachment breaks the connection of the 3 ‘present parts’ that split apart:

Since that equation includes the 3 essential arrows of the Universe, not only one arrow as a clock does:

The arrow of past spatial entropy, $p; the arrow of temporal information, SS, and the product of them, C, A CONSTANT balance, or arrow of reproduction.

It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:

Max. S x Min. T = K ;      S=C=T      and Min. S x Max. T=C.

Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.

Its application extends in 5D to life and history. If we call the age of maximal locomotion, youth, the energy age of balance between the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its energy and information.

But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its arrow of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.

Life grows temporal information, as time increases the form of beings, TT-> SS, and death its inversion, Ts> St.

So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics).

The reason why death exists in a perfect, immortal Universe is obvious: if species only evolved socially towards more information, they would end into a ‘big crunch’. So the Universe and all its parts should have, long ago, reached a point of  maximal density, with no return. To avoid this, the ‘game of life and death’ exists, whereas death is the opposite arrow to , as it dissolves the networks that put together individual cells, breaking the super-organism back into its parts. But we are now concerned with the arrow of life.

The ±1 social arrow has, in fact, 2 directions:

The positive, +1, social arrow of cellular evolution creates life and makes a being emerge at birth.

The -1, negative arrow of cellular dissolution kills life and dissolves a being into its cells and atoms. Thus, it is the key arrow of the life/death cycles that clock-time misses. Hence the enormous simplification of those 4 time-arrows, brought about by clocks, which in Physics, since Galileo, only measure the first and most simple of those arrows, the energy of motion.

The result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality. The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes societies (super-organisms of History ) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time. In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the meaning of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±1   change=time:

+1: Conception:  ruled by form (Morphogenesis in still space), as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks.

1st age:                  Youth or Age of motion.

2nd age:             Reproduce its energy.

energy and information are balanced

3rd age:                All energy and motion becomes information.

-1:Death:               The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells.

Death equations: ∆+1<<∑∆-1

Death is a lower descend two scales fro ∆1 to ∆-1 of a ternary super organism extending on Ξ planes of existence. As such it creates a blast of entropy-motion in relative infinitesimal quanta of time, t->0, expanding past the c-onstant of speed of the system, V>>C, as the information of the whole disintegrates travelling to the past.

The equations of ¾ as well as those of quantum physics allow for both simultaneity in space and non-locality, due to the explosion in space at V>>c of such a system, which makes it seem simultaneous and past travelling of information, which is the real event of death.

What this means is that the information of the system, and paramount to it the soul, @ª•… will travel to the past and we shall consider the implications n different analysis of those tests:

Graphic representations of the 3±¡ ages of existence.

Humans perceive simultaneously the 3 ages of some species too small and fast to differentiate them. As particles in bubble chamber or cars in the night, we see the long time of the species – an entire spiral vortex with the 3 ages of a space-time being.  In the next graph, such long world-line, or life-graph is in fact a spiral in terms of spatial population and cyclical speed: The organism looses mass and accelerates inwards its form as it becomes slimmer in space. The first age of the spiral is its energetic mouth that brings in a galaxy the interstellar dust, which will give birth to stars, in the middle, reproductive age and will collapse in the center, the informative black hole:

Any form can be represented in a spiral graph of space-time. For example, the evolution of the FMI complex with its 800-80-8 cycles of increasing informative evolution is an spiral of 3 horizons in a decametric scale: 800 years civilizations, 80 years nations and 8 years ‘decades’, in which the product is evolving faster and now becomes integrated by networks. This 3-horizon evolving ternary network, central to social sciences can be also represented in a spiral of accelerated birth and death of human civilizations destroyed by wars. Any mass or charge is in fact a natural spiral, through which photons and gluons become denser till collapsing in the bigger particle, as interstellar gas does in a galaxy. All those spirals can be seen as equivalent to the world-lines of lineal physics, now world-cycles of a living organism both in time and space, as a whole or as a wave of evolving particles.

Cyclical time: expanding Einstein’s principle of equivalence to historic vortices.

The essential concept of General Relativity is the principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitation. Both are the same. Yet as physical acceleration is maximal in a vortex, VoxRo=K, a vortex IS accelerated Time and as a vortex increases the frequency of the cycle, inwards, diminishing the ‘lineal timespace’ of each cycle, time accelerates its information as it SHORTENS its periods. This fully accounts for the arrow of future time that increases information in 5D spacetime theory and applies to all systems of time, including Physics (laws of forces), evolution (Laws of species), History and the Earth at large:

The main arrow of future time which is an accelerated vortex of evolution of cyclical form, departing from a simpler relative past of entropic slower time cycles (the only arrow of time studied by physicists), to a faster more informative future of higher informative content.

A ‘vortex of accelerated informative time cycles’ is essential to all systems of Nature, albeit not understood by ‘primitive huminds’ still stuck in the study of simple spacetime locomotions (one-dimensional analysis of time in physical sciences) and its reductionist 4D models. So let us illustrate what a vortex of accelerated time is precisely with the most advanced work of Physicists, specifically Einstein’s work on accelerated vortices of physical space-time called masses:

Down the graph, in 5D, the explanation of forces and its proper unification is rather simple, as each main scale of space-time will display ‘attractive accelerated vortices’ of time-space which are the relative dimotion of future of physical systems (Equivalence principle of Relativity between mass and acceleration). There are 3 scales and vortices of ‘accelerated time’ that carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles: charges in the microcosms, thermodynamic eddies in our scale and masses in the larger cosmological scale. A simple proof also from classic Planck & Einstein’s equations: E=hƒ+ E=mc² gives us M=(h/c²) ƒ.

So Mass is the product of a constant number (h/c²) multiplied by the frequency of its accelerated attractive vortex, which attracts more the faster it turns till reaching the c-speed turning speed of the black hole in its horizon vortex: as in a hurricane that attracts more the faster it turns, smaller, faster turning electromagnetic forces attract more than slow large mass vortices (solving the hierarchy problem of gravitational forces much weaker than electromagnetic ones).

Then just by applying the simplest metric equations of 5D that all physical systems follow: S x ƒ = k  (size in space x frequency in its rotary motion are inverse – so the smaller a system in space is the faster it will accelerate its time cycles), we can make sense of the mass of particles. Further on, we can unify with those metric equations the 3 scales of physics, as the equations of a time mass vortex becomes those of a charge vortex, when we ‘accelerate’ and diminish its size in 5D metric. So a galaxy is equivalent to an atom and a black hole to a proton of the lower accelerated plane. The next graph, from the seminal book of Bio-history, Bio-economics: a theory of Unification’ C.92, the vortex of History which follows the same laws of any vortex of time, regardless of ‘spatial form’:

Scalar big-bangs are the entropy dimotion of the Universe.

We left for the end, the study of entropy in the cosmological scale, which is the inverse function of the creation of a vortex of mass-information. Entropy of vacuum space thus balances the implosive gravitational force of galaxies. Yet for physicists to be able to deny that balance they have developed an entropic theory where only vacuum space matters and matter does not matter at all (:

The duality of death in history.

In history death also occurs by an excess of information in the 3rd age of the being, followed by an entropic war, when technological information preys over human beings as weapons kill our bodies and go(l)d our minds.

We observe the 3 ages in a circular form, with the Paleolithic youth or past energetic age in the center, the balanced Neolithic in the right and the animetal age in the left, the 3rd age of excess of information and death in a neo-Paleolithic of the new species, the machine that closely resembles our Paleolithic, depicted in closer view in the next graphs:

We represent the wave equation of history in two formats as a transversal wave and as a vortex of time, accelerating its information inwards.

The equation of history  is a cyclical wave equation of evolutionary systems that shows the fluctuation between predating radiations of extinctive metal-species and human species.

The equation in that sense is similar to the Volterra curves of predation, which slowly but steadily and an accelerate rate provoke the extinction of a species by its predators, parasites and competitors.

It is an evolutionary equation, which started with the arrival of metal. It accelerated to 80 years with the arrival of machines and it has accelerated again to 8 years with the arrival of chips.

So in the past new machines appeared only 800 years and so we had 7 cycles of war and extinction of civilizations and the weapons that caused them, studied in the right side of this blog: bronze swords, chariots, iron, coins and mercenary armies, spur cavalry, gunpowder and machines… Now we have shorter 8 years cycles of electronic wars and digital weapons (robots and bombs researched with computers). And each of those evolutions of weapons caused the extinction of civilizations in worldwide ages of war.

The duality of graphs of waves of existence: Cyclical vs. lineal waves.

All this said it is obvious that we can represent in phase mental space, which ultimately are all the spaces of the Universe (see Universe in space), the cycle of existence either in cylical or lineal forms:

The equivalent graph in lineal time will give us a bell curve – the lineal version of a cyclical life-line: The speed of time/information changes during the ages of life, shaping a bell curve, such as the st-1 age is the fastest age of informative evolution, which diminishes in the young age to a halt, when the speed of cellular reproduction and energetic growth becomes maximal, both reach a steady state in the mature age, of SóT, rhythmic back and forth beats; and then in the 3rd age energy decelerates first and then information decelerates and collapses till death provokes a maximal explosion of information into energy. Those phases of different speeds of energy and information can be generalized to any system and event that will always go through 3 ages: an accelerated seminal and young age of increase of form and energy, a steady state of constant speed and a decelerated age till the system comes to a halt and the event dies away.

One of the key quantitative elements that connect the 4th and 3rd paradigm of metric measure is the fact that not only each species has a different rhythm of change and clock of time, but the same species changes its time rhythms and speeds through its 3 ages. This feature is fundamental to understand all processes that involve evolution, from the different masses of ‘gravitational vortices’ of information, ruled by the equation of a vortex (VtxRs=k in simplified notation; thus the closer to the center, the faster we rotate, the faster the frequency of information of the vortex and the shorter the space we need to close a frequency cycle), to the evolutionary process of information in this planet, which can be mapped out and its frequency shown to follow a logarithmic process of acceleration, which now reaches its zenith with the creation of informative machines. In that regard we can consider the following ‘speeds of time’ of any event or self-similar ternary topology of energetic youth/membrane, reproductive maturity and informative, 3rd age (hyperbolic center of a system):

-st-1: Seminal age: Informative evolution is maximal, since the system occupies minimal space (Black hole paradox: Min. Se=Max.Ti). It is the palingenetic age.

– Energetic Youth: Evolution of information decelerates after the ‘landing’ of the species in the higher St-plane. Now acceleration of energy takes place.

-Reproductive, mature, steady state: Both energy and information maintain a constant speed in St=Ts (ST) feedback cycles, which will last depending on the access of the event to new energy and directional information.

–  3rd age: Now both energy first and then information follow a decelerated process of collapse; first energy becomes exhausted and then…

Death: Information collapses, exploding into its st-1 scale of cellular energy in a relative zero time (the minimal unit of time of the st-scale). Death is the fastest motion of the Universe.

,Recap. In physical terms the 3 ages of biological change can be considered the positive, accelerated youth, the reproductive, present age of constant speed, in which humans repeat themselves and the 3rd negative, decelerated age of temporal age, or 3rd age, which ends in death, when the balance of the Universe is restored.


 In the graph, a classic, Taoist representation of the 3 ages of life and its inverse parameters of youth (max. energy) and old age (max Information) represented by the triads of the I Ching, and a modern graph of duality showing those parameters as a semi-cycle, which in certain simple beings like light are in fact both the ages of time of a physical wave and its form in space, as light quanta, h=exi, is indeed both our basic cycle of time and surface of energetic space of which all are made.

One of the oldest graphs from 92.c. ‘The error of Einstein’, pioneer book on 5D physics is the understanding of a

Galaxy as a representation of the game of existence, and its deep metaphysical implications in terms of mental spaces, which summarizes in a huge metaphysical thought regarding the way a mind perceives a mental space:

Minds diminish the information they observe from reality as reality becomes further away in ∆ST distances (scale, form or motion), to a point in which they only perceive the purest forms of mental space, which are the waves of existence in cyclical form (our perception of the galaxy) or lineal form (our perception of the light of the quantum scale, or in scalar form (fractal perception of networks in hyperbolic space).

We resume in the graph, this key insight on the nature of space: we see a higher world as an elliptic curved geometry, a lower world as as a lineal entropic geometry and in between scales we see fractal hyperbolic networks, as those 3 ‘existential’ views are parallel to the roles we play for a larger system, for which we are ‘entropic cells’, the role a lower system plays for usl as it is our food-space and the game we play in between scales as we form social networks with similar beings. So the existential game becomes a game of survival by selecting information in the right form to the function the system plays in those 3 mental spaces. This is the ultimate meaning of vital geometry and as a secondary key outshoot of it we can find the paradoxes of perception of ages, scales and topologies.

 

 

ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY MIND STIENCES: LANGUAGES & MENTAL MIRRORS. ITS EXISTENTIAL EQUATION

Look around you. All what you see is a form with motion. It might be at rest but it will be moving respect to another point of view (ab. Pov), which is moving but feels himself at rest. This is all the whys physicists so far have answered about motion.

All ‘moves’ and doesn’t move. If we call the state of motion entropy and the state of no-motion, form. And the combinations of motion and form, ‘momentum’, when taken step by step. Or when measured in a longer interval, ‘forms in action’ in-form-ations’ if the form dominates. Or ‘energetic motions’, if the entropy≈motion dominates.

And the whole process of the event we analyze from the initial state of form with no entropy=motion, through the motions of in-form-ation and energy, till its final state back to form, a worldcycle… We Do have all what we need to explain the rhythms, beats, and timespace events of the Universe. So if we put then in a series, it is easy to see the sequence of a worldcycle of ‘tao’, of timespace, of ‘exist¡ence’, of ‘science’:

Worldcycle: Form<Motion>Energy>Information>Form<motion… and then we restart again.

The reader might think such series are simple and inconsequential, but when we proper understand the rhythms of creation of minds-mirrors-forms, with it, the modes of creation of species, or the world cycle of life and death, departing of such simple game of 5 dimotions of time-space he might think otherwise – a seed of form, moves in entropic fashion and live through the rainbow of color-states of a world cycle of existence:

Indeed, this simple scheme will as we iterate and combine those elements into the myriad of sums and variations that web reality, explain all worldcycles of existence from the worldcycle of life and death, to the worldcycle of evolution of species…

In the graph we can see how all systems are born as a see of form, which emerges into a larger scale with maximal entropy-motion, then passes through an age of energy and reproduces, becoming informed till an old age of pure form when again becomes dissolved into an explosion of entropy and motion. In physics this simple scheme gives birth to the states of matter between plasma and nuclear death, in life to the states between the seminal seed that emerges as a child that lives three ages through an entropic youth, an energetic mature, reproductive age and a third age of information that explodes into entropic death, dissolving its structures. Societies suffer the same evolution departing from its founding seed, a memetic prophet and book of revelation, dying in the entropic death caused by the germs of history, weapons and wars… So indeed, all systems follow similar cycles because they are all made of relational space-time.

If SS-mind and TT-entropy find themselves in opposite realms meeting the duality of death, the true beauty of the Universe is their rapprochement in the balance of ST as they come together in the gender bender of lineal male locomotions and female informative vortices, which finally merge (St<->Ts; S=T) as one becomes the other and reproduce its form. This balanced ‘birth of life, beauty, creation and energy of reproduction’ is the true miracle of the Universe that entropic humans and its ‘animetal dominant cultures’ always missed; even if their most cherished science, physics is based on its discovery, they called relativity and we shall call the…

Galilean Paradox: S≤=≥T: Relativity of space Dimensions=Forms=Motion in time: The 5 Universal Dimotions

Galileo’s time and space Principle of Relativity is the fundamental conceptual thought behind the relationship between time=motion and space=form and how one can be converted into another: All what exists is made of space=form and time=motion. And yet physicists know that we cannot distinguish motion from form. That any being in motion from its point of view seems to be still and all other things moving around it. This is the principle of Relativity of motion.

Physicists then without much thought about that fascinating duality, went on to use mathematics to calculate the relative motion of each entity of reality respect to other system, which seems static from both points of view. This is called Galilean relativity, latter refined by Einstein’s relativity, and essentially is concerned with the mathematical calculus of what we shall call the 2nd Dimotion of time=change, locomotion. Fine, but we are more interested on the duality of space=form and motion=time and its entangled relationships –the reasons why we do NOT see together motion and form, even if all systems have both.

The conclusion is then rather obvious: one of the two parameters of reality is ‘hidden’ to perception; we either see motion or form, ‘waves or particles’ (quantum complementarity), distances and lines or points in motion (as in the night when fast cars in a picture appear as lines). So physicists calculate only one when in fact we must assess the existence of 2; and since we cannot distinguish them, logically we must equal them. ‘Form=motion-function; space=time; S=T’.

Relativity then becomes a duality, S=T, which is at the heart of every law of the Universe. But which one is the ‘fundamental’ element? Obviously time=motion. Space is a “Maya of the senses” – a slice of time motion. The ultimate substance is motion. Form is what a ‘still mind’, makes of that motion to ‘perceive’, information, forms-in-action.

Since we see Earth still and flat but it is round and moving. Galileo’s profession was ballistics – the study of cannonballs motion. So he chose ONLY motion and lost the chance to start physics with a complex philosophical understanding of its S=T dual Principle of relativity, which Poincare defined latter clearly when he said that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’. An example is quantum/relativity duality. In detail quantum space has ‘dark energy’ because it has expansive motion that extends into a plane of space, but when seen at larger scales without detail its entropic motion seems static space – a dual area of scattering length and width. So in the galaxy we see either dark energy motion or expanding space: T=S. A motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space: Distance and motion cannot be distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a space=time Ðimotion:

S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion

We must stress the enormous importance of this equation of present reproduction, which creates a symmetry between space topologies and time ages, space forms and time functions. A simple example will suffice:

In the Universe if we were to picture the ‘big-bang theory’ (even though we reject it as a whole cosmic theory, it might make sense if we were in an entropic gaseous ‘galatomic’ region of the upper hyperuniverse) NOT in time but in space, the cosmic radiation will be a wall of fire, that surrounds as a ‘cell wall’ the whole region of space-time galaxies we perceive. The wall of fire of the Universe is its maximal speed membrane of 10-100Z and the point of maximal density within is the great attractor that will make the Universe a closed self-contained superorganism of galatoms. It is then time or space? Beginning or frontier? Both.

In our ‘future paper on calculus’ – the science of time change in its mathematical form; the concept of a limit where a function can be established with certainty, either in space and time, plays a similar role to the ‘barrier of entropy: entropy then becomes the uncertain infinity beyond the limits in which the function is definable. While the coordinates center becomes the reference point or mind who has such limits of perception of the function.

Why if the Earth moves in time, we see it as a still form in space? Because Reality is a constant game of infinite motions, but the mind focus in stillness those motions, and measures them at distances. For ‘huminds’ motion is relative to our systems of measure and perception, which are light-based; hence a fixed c-rod speed/distance. Reason why Einstein’s relativity postulates a maximal T:c-speed, measured as if observer and observable were still to each other (Constant S); which at our scale we ‘correct’ with Lorentz Transformations.

But physicists just substitutes the Earth’s still distances for motions, and it took another 300 years for Einstein to realize the relativity of motion and its measure made essentially time and space, motion and form two sides of the same coin. Still this realization was not explored philosophically and so it gave birth to a series of ill-understood dualities between ‘states of measure and form’ (particles, head gauging form, in-form-ation) and ‘states of motion’ (wave states).

The 5 dimotions of space-time as inner and outer motions.

A more precise definition specially for physical sciences of the previous 5 ‘states’ of spacetime deals with the concept of internal and external motion (which has deep implications for relativity and so we will expand it in the paper ‘physics and space-time’. Any cyclical time-space organism, even the simple circle divides space-time into an inner and outer region (knot theory, membranes of all topological systems). We talk of internal and external motion and form in a system. As it is evident that external motion in a larger world is bigger than a being’s internal motion. So little motion means internal motion, t and a lot of motion external motion. Thus we define the 5 dimensional motions of space-time with more finesse. Whereas capital letters, S & T mean external and small letters t and s mean internal (as the internal part have less volume, are smaller than the outer world).

Ts is external motion (T) and internal form (s): It is classic locomotion, where the internal system doesn’t move but it translates in the external world. This is what physicists mostly study, and they still wonder why when a material system moves, the ‘center of gravity’ seems fixed. But what internal part? The answer is the mind-brain; the system that perceives information; as the limbs/fields move a body over which a particle-head gauges that information:

-St is therefore information, where externally there is no motion (S) and internally the ‘mind-mapping’, that mirrors the outer world becomes a form-in-motion, in-form-ation, processed by the brain, particle, crystal image, cpu… It is a fascinating fact that we, the thinkers, spend so much time, still; so Leibniz could spend days seat on a chair thinking, that in sleep more brain activity happens and more hormonal languages develop.

– ST or st is then balanced internal-external motion vs. form, or energy, of which there are two varieties we ad, Ts-kinetic energy akin to locomotion, (mv2/2; where as you can observe the ‘motion’ provided by v is squared, so it is more important than the mass/form) and St-potential energy, where the energy is store internally in the different tensions and cyclical patterns of the system, but externally it is all position. Energy then is the balanced sum of both, St+Ts=ST and it is the essential law of physics that a system constantly balances both (SMH motions; Lagrangian actions which are its difference tending to zero (St-Ts=0, St=Ts). Existential energy is thus the mother of all battles, and we could state that in a ‘given plane of exist¡ence’, energy never dies, but constantly transforms between the informative, potential energy state and the kinetic, locomotion states.

This leave us the 2 limits of pure form, SS, Ss, which correspond to ‘seeds’ and ‘mind-languages’ with null motion, (which following our formalism should be written Ss, but my lazy ‘fingers’ often repeat 2 SS, sorry)

And Tt (written TT often… lazy f…), which we shall call entropy or scattering or death or disorder, as when a system moves internally and externally it is really disorganizing its structure and ultimately as in expansive big-bangs of mass, or death processes of corruption, all parts go away and the system dies.

For example war is the Tt entropic state of a superorganism of history, a social mass of ∆+1 humans in time, when there are external motion (armies invading enemy nations) and internal motion (troops invading internally the country), which ends is the massacre of people. At individual level today, children, as humanity enters its age of entropy as it becomes obsolete, degraded and likely soon substituted by machines and chips and robots, is clearly suffering an entropic age, sometimes called A.D.D.

The child has maximal external motion (as we shall see due to the correspondence of STates and ST-ages of life) but today has also maximal internal ADD motion in the brain, filled with virtual hypnotic fiction bull$hit, from mental machines that are disordering us in what we call the Neo-paleolithic age of History. For physical systems Tt is also death as the system explodes, scatters and its internal parts move externally. So yes, those 5 Dimotions apply from the simplest particle to the more complex superorganism of history.

In physics this prolegomena will become then fundamental to understand the principles of Relativity, the fact that we cannot distinguish motion from form, S for T and both therefore must be put together in ‘dimotions’. So we shall see that the fundamental equation of the Universe is SóT (ab.S=T). As there is a constant dynamic transference of Motion and Form between the inner and outer world, which allows a system to transit between the 5 Dimotions of existence.

Quantum motions vs. continuous derivatives.

We shall introduce now one of the ‘mantra themes’ of all the introductions to 5D theory, which we will expand greatly as we revise those texts, as it is the ‘central piece’ of any physical theory of motion.

With physicists definition of time as locomotion (Ts) we can only understand very simple spatial motions with NO inner change on them (s-patial form in Ts is fixed). This is reflected in the use of ‘present=instant derivatives’ which do not admit ‘peaks’ of changes of STages for physical systems. Since the calculus of locomotions uses ‘instants of present=finitesimal derivatives’ that don’t apply to ‘change of internal parameters’, to inner motions necessary to change STages of life, where the system switches from external to internal motion; as it stop and goes through its existence. So for example, the change from youth to maturity, Ts>ST means a change of ‘s’ to S, from internal no-motion to internal change in information that brings up the reproduction of the system.

This is the key to the whole structure of change in the Universe, which happens with the interplay of internal and external motion and form. I.e. when we act, we first ‘stay put’ as form, but our mind is ‘thinking’, having internal motion, and so we think what we shall act, and then we act, and our mind is ‘stopping’ it has no internal motion. So the fundamental event of motion v. thought is St (internal motion, external form) < = > Ts (internal form, external motion). In those systems a continuous calculus approach fails totally to understand the quantum stop < go process.

In the stop process information is processed internally, as ‘small caps’. motion, ‘t’; collapsed as a a wave (physical systems), processed in a dream state (life organisms), thought of (humans); in the go process, the information is repeated by a quantum wave; reproduced externally by a mitosis cell, projected by a mind, reproduced by a seed… The examples are many as those stœps ARE the main whys of the fractal Universe, which is a reproductive organism.

A key to all of those events are the ‘Stœps’; changes of states, quantum by quantum of Space ó motion transformations in the inner and outer regions of the being, in the different scales of the Universe.

There is not a personal god indeed but if there were one designing such perfect Universe I would like to share his thoughts. You have always a ‘cyclical time membrane’ that separates an inner and outer world. One of them might be in motion, one might be still, the combinations of those possibilities and all its changes, either one by one, or two by two, in infinite stœps of infinite beings describes almost all realities. Some are more important than others; some sequences of changes are fundamental as the sequence of the worldcycle.

And then there is the way the mind selects certain states and ignores others, like in a movie picture. Consider two of them that are inverse and will come up many times, and when we increase in a future review the complexity of those physical texts with advanced maths will show the full beauty of the mathematical mirror of physic:

– St: The perception of motion as stillness: In this ‘series’ the mind does NOT perceive the motion STage at all, only the stop State, and as such it explains why the earth is moving but the mind sees it still.

– Ts: Perception of stillness as motion: in this view, the mind doesn’t perceive the state of wave-motion, but only the series of still, informative positions. It explains why we see motion on systems that are still, as frames of a movie.

We either perceive the wave state or the particle, still state but NOT both at the same time, because then we would see a jerky Universe.

In the mathematical mirror it means we can have either a topological, geometric analysis or a calculus, changing analysis; we can define reality in terms of ‘continuous functions’ or we can consider discrete approaches.

But what is a deeper truth? Not the continuous but the discrete, stop and go approach as we show in our paper on 5D mathematics and time (Calculus).

It is then essential to grasp that motion and form co-exist as 2 different states depending on 5D scale and detail: Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night, a car’s headlight seems a long distance line ‘still’ picture. But this means also that the 3 ‘Euclidean still dimensions’ must have motion; they are ‘bidimensional ST-holographic, topologic dimotions’. So we have 3 Space + 1 Time + 1 5th dimension of scales = 5 Dimensional motions. None of them is a Dimension of pure spatial form or a pure time motion but a combination of both. Even if mentally we reduce motion and focus on forms, all has motion=time, and form =space: this is the meaning of ‘spacetime’, the messing of both into 5 dimotions, the fundamental element of all realities.

Relativity states ‘we cannot distinguish motion=time from position=space’. So all what exists is a composite of both, undistinguishable S=T, 5 ‘Dimensional motions’ (Ab. Dimotions), broken in infinite fractal, vital time space organisms, composed of topological Dimotions: height=information; length=locomotion; width=reproduction; form=social evolution of parts into wholes & entropy=dissolution of a whole into its parts in a lower scale of the fifth dimension (term we keep for the whole range of scales of the Universe); whose study is both mathematical, the main science that studies how those 5 Dimotions entangle in simultaneous Space, connected to each other topological adjacent parts, which create supœrganism, and Logic; the main science of time that observes how those pentalogic, entangled supœrganisms move and evolve, change in sequential relational time, living a worldcycle of life and death.

And since there is nothing else than time and space, those 2 experimental primary ‘mirror-sciences’ of time and space become the most important to extract the ‘Disomorphic=laws’ of those 5 Dimotions that all systems have in common. Since while those Dimotions are broken, in vital organisms, separated by cyclical time membranes, they are the same.

In the graph Galilean relativity was ill understood, as the true question about time-change is why ‘the mind sees space as a still continuum, when in detail is made of smaller self-similar quanta, in motion. The paradox defines mental spaces as still simplified views of the more complex whole. The 3 ¡logic paradoxes of space topology (closed in-form-ative curved-O vs. |-open, free entropic lineal forms), time-motion (stillness vs. motion) and ∆-scale, (continuous whole vs. discrete forms; single scale vs. multiple one)s, are essential to the perception of a simplified ‘spatial mind universe’ in a single flat still plane vs. the full, more detailed complex picture in time, of a curved, discrete and moving Universe. Those paradoxes resume the 5 elements of reality, Space=form, time=motion, scales and the mind that measures them, within its own entropic limits.

Galilean Px. S=T explains the existence of mind-spaces based in linguistic forms, whose equation is the basis of the psychology of the mind – the ego paradox, and the processes of creation of scales (seeds, minds, genetics.)

Descartes was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind. So he described a Universe as the sum of ∞ mind-worlds that don’t speak the same languages or create the same reality mappings ‘huminds’ create. But all entities that exist were made of: Open §pace, he called ‘res extensa’; closed, cyclic ðimes, he called ‘vortices’ & – realizing the only proof he had of the existence of vortices and res extensa is the fact he perceived them (‘I think therefore I am’) he added the mind, which in 5D Metrics (Sxð=c) is the smallest informative mirror that stores max. information by expelling all redundant, ‘reproductive motion’ becoming a still language; hence also the Generator of all digital numbers:

0 x ∞=K

0-finitesimal spatial mind x ∞ time cycles = Constant mind-world:  §@(mind space)<≈>∆ð (universal cycles)

Origin of the Ego paradox, the key to psychology, subjective human cultures, religions & ‘ænthropic’science: ‘Every mind measures reality from its biased p.o.v. confusing the ∞ Universe with its ‘finitesimal self-centered world’

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space.

Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors. But infinite other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S = Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.

So creation of reality scales is a simple game, in which a point mind ‘reduces reality’ to its infinitesimal form and then projects into its local territory of order, which will reflect at scale, the larger whole or world, which the linguistic image reduced and then enlarged back into its territorial form: Fractal points unlike Euclidean ones are points with parts, as we come into its scale grow in size and display the 3 minimal parts of all of them, its area, frequency of angular momentum, and central Active Magnitude, the ‘singularity’ – focus of charge, mass, forces or informative minds. Minds are thus also reproductive functions across ‘scales’ of the fifth dimension, which reduce and project its mirror-image in its body-territory of order.

Humans have reduced the 5 dimotions of timespace to the one used in the wordly religion of physicists, our popes of time – locomotion and entropy, since physicists do weapons of entropic destruction and trasnsport machines. And minds are ego-centered and proyect what they know to model reality as ‘themselves’. So we first had anthropomorphic Gods and thought to be the center of the Universe. Then we talked words and thought God named things to create. Now physicists make entropic machines and use digital numbers to measure reality with those machines so they model the Universe as a machine, have entropic destructive theories of reality (big-bangs) and reduce the 5 Dimotions of spacetime to the ones they machines use, entropy and locomotion and very slowly as they know use computers have become interested by the dimensional motions of information, but Humind’s astounding arrogance and desire to the be center of the Universe will ever prevent us to understand information, because form IS a mental, linguistic, still mind mapping that requires to accept for reality the sentient properties we jealously keep for ourselves. So if you are humble enough to witness a symphony which you still don’t understand as you don’t yet know its basic sounds and harmonies, keep reading.

In the graph, regardless of egocy that reduces sensorial, sentient survival ‘rights’ to nitrolife species, with a simple 7-electronic brain clock in its amino rings, and reproductive ones to its phosphorated carbon DNA helices LIFE starts in the particles of the atom. Your mind is electronic, your information is coded in spins, and any other atom in proper liquid conditions might evolve into complemntary life forms according to the laws of formal space and time motions, of topology and vital functions, described with the existential ¡logic of Generational Space-time.

Entanglement though implies the simultaneous convergence in a fractal point of present of motion=time, form=space, limits=entropy, scalar planes=organic networks and a common language spoken by all those elements that become integrated into a whole. And this complex entanglement of 5 elements or ‘dimensional motions’, TT-entropy, Ts-motion, TS-iterative reproduction, St-information and SS-language, creates reality with enormous determinism despite its ‘apparent fragility’.

The Unit of life IS the atom, not the DNA ensemble, and as such we must depart in our construction of the mind from its electronic orbitals; each one a dimension of information, whose spin are the smallish apertures of our π-cycle, the eyes of the quark mind that measure of the external motions of those atoms with the quantum computing of its spins.

Monads order the Universe from its ilogic point of view.

The fundamental unit of information of the universe, its fundamental particle is NOT a detail, a given physical form, which would make easy the description of reality with a ‘constructivist’ philosophy of science, as the one sponsored by Physicists. We would just start with the description of the Nucleon and its beta decay into ± proton masses and electronic charges, which become Hydrogen atoms and in the upper scale of the ‘galatom’, unit of the hyper-universe, in the self-similar quasar big-bang cycle of its black holeµproton… And enlightened by the findings of Non-Euclidean mathematics and Non-Aristotelian algebra resolve the conundrums of physics, pack a few Nobel prizes and go back home. But it is NOT that easy. The Universe is NOT that retarded. It is a magnificent game of exist¡ences, defined by LOGIC principles, related to its two essential poles, ‘form’, in-form-ation and motion, time.

And yet because each fractal point-monad is born as a self-centered mind, monologic is the first perception of exist¡ence. And most of its species never evolve beyond it.

Mind stiences study the sentient properties of every type of superorganisms’ mind.

The Galilean Px. S=T explains the existence of mind-spaces based in linguistic forms, whose function is the basis of the mind’s psychology– the ego paradox, and the processes of creation of scales (seeds, minds, genetics, etc.)

The mind or 0-point is, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ it confuses with the universe. So the mind is a fractal point •, but believers to be it all.

The paradox of the Ego – who make each mind to feel so important – is then rooted in the self-centered structure of the mind, which selects information from its point of view, creating, an infinitesimal linguistic mind-mapping of reality – which then it confuses with the whole universe:

0-linguistic mindx∞ Universal space-time cycles=Constant World mapping of reality, with @mind at its center.

The ∞ information of the Universe is reduced into the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we expel all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centered view.

The mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, a relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of space-Time of the Universe, reducing them to a World to fit selected useful information into the finitesimal volume of the brain. The mind function is the origin of the Ego paradox, the key to psychology, subjective human cultures, religions & ‘ænthropic’ science: ‘Every mind measures reality from its biased p.o.v. confusing the ∞ Universe with its ‘finitesimal self-centered world’

The universe has infinite such mind-mirrors depending on the forces used to gauge the external world, which bounces on a limited quantity of its scales of space. Humans perceive the range of scales of the frequency of light between red and blue social density of colors.

∞ other minds with different detail according to the quantitative pixels they absorb (max. S=Min.t) maximal for smaller sixes will determine the intelligence of the system. Mind languages map reality into spatial forms. It is the ‘intelligent’ still spatial limit of reality, as all what exists are disordered entropic motions=forces and ‘minds’, particles-heads whose logic & mathematical languages create a territorial body order that forms of reality. ‘Vital motions and perceptive minds’ make up a ‘vital, perceptive, intelligent’ Universe. Since particles have all the 5 Dimotions, gauging information, decoupling=reproducing & evolving social with magnetic fields.

How can we formalize the concept of a mind as a fractal point, whose infinitesimal volume hold a world in itself? Through one of the many 5D revolutions– the upgrading of the principles of non-Euclidean geometry.

The creation of scales of reality is then a simple game in which a point mind reduces reality to its infinitesimal form and then projects into its local territory of order, which will reflect at scale, the larger whole or world, which the linguistic image reduced and then enlarged back into its territorial form: Fractal points unlike Euclidean ones are points with parts, as we come into its scale grow in size and display the 3 minimal parts of all of them, its area, frequency of angular momentum, and central Active Magnitude, the ‘singularity’ – focus of charge, mass, forces or informative minds. Minds are thus also reproductive functions across ‘scales’ of the fifth dimension, which reduce and project its mirror-image in its body-territory of order:

A mind exists in all systems in which time stops to form space. In galaxies happens in relativity functions in black holes, its mind. In thermodynamic physics in the eye of an Eddie. In quantum physics in the center of an atom, or charge. Without linguistic minds that order by reflecting its smaller mind into its local territory reality would not exist. The only way to create fractals is through mirror images. 

In all scales of stience minds fix time motions into spatial, linguistic formal mappings that reduce the whole with its synoptic language to fit in a particle-head that acts in its world-territory after gauging information.

Thus we define ‘Maxwellian’s demons’ of local order in all scales – physical minds as the infinitesimal points that create order in physical systems with the same Disomorphic laws that all others do in more complex scales. As each mind orders as a linguistic god a territory around itself, its fractal body and entropic world.

Unfortunatelly all minds project their biased self-centered model of reality with them at its center and the still world they stop to fit in their mind as a dead territory of order. So humans deny the existence of ∞ minds, as if they were the only ‘special’ sentient point of order and their languages, first the verbal form of its anthropomorphic Gods, today digital numbers, the only of the Universe. And in this manner because ∞ discontinuous minds is the generator of form, of information and order over the entropic flow of mindless time motion, the destruction of one of the two poles of reality means we will never be able to answer rationally the whys of the Universe.

Egocy reduces sensorial, sentient survival ‘rights’ to nitrolife species, with a simple 7-electronic brain clock in its amino rings, and reproductive ones to its phosphorated carbon DNA helices LIFE starts in the particles of the atom. Your mind is electronic, your information is coded in spins, and any other atom in proper liquid conditions might evolve into complementary life forms according to the laws of formal space and time motions, of topology and vital functions, described with the existential ¬Æ=ilogic of Generational Space-time.

This is the Universe in a nutshell, and so we can now explain and at the same time widen the entropic simplest theories of huminds that ‘reduce’ all that 5D complexity to simplex elements, starting precisely by the mathematica definition of a mind which is nothing but a ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal point’, that holds a world in itself (Leibniz).

CONCLUSION: A FRACTAL UNIVERSE OF BIOTOPOLOGIC SPACETIME ORGANISMS

  • As everything is made of space and time, albeit more complex than the Newtonian limited view, all what exists have similar properties, emerging from those 2 ultimate substances, ‘motion and form’, we shall call Disomorphisms, (isomorphic=laws, derived of our common nature), which can be casted with mathematical and logic languages.
  • Because time and space are more complex, we need first to evolve in depth our logic concepts and mathematical equations of both parameters, in all its space dimensions and time motions, beyond Newton’s simplification:. The result is the study of a fractal space, whose similar scales define a new ‘fifth dimension‘ that puts together all those scales each one studied by a different science – from quantum physics to cosmology through the scales of life and social sciences and a series of ‘cyclical, repetitive time clocks’ that give time an informative ‘height’, stored in the frequency and form of its cycles. Both together give us the metric of the 5th dimension as smaller spatial scales have faster clocks, but both together remain co-invariant: S x T =K.

Thus the Universe has mathematical, spatial continuous & logic, temporal, cyclical & organic, fractal properties derived of the more complex ¡logic geometry of 5D scalar space and cyclic time. Thus even if we describe it with the same logic-mathematical equations a 5D Universe is very different, as scalar space brings organic and sentient properties, and cyclical time, informative deterministic patterns, which the lineal philosophy of mechanist physics ignores. From those scalar, hence organic, cyclical hence informative and moving, energetic, hence vital properties of scalar space and cyclical time, a complete different picture of reality arises; where languages become the ‘extreme’ limit of the still formal ‘spatial state’ of the being with minimal size and maximal information.

Whereas each ‘stience’ defines a scale of the nested Universe, from Physics focused on the largest & smallest scales of the ‘Galatom’ further removed from man, to the Formal digital and logic sciences closest to our ∆1 mind scale. Languages thus become the limiting formal, spatial scale of reality and as such they are mirrors of the fractal Universe that share the ‘Disomorphic’ (Equal laws) of all the scales of reality. And so mathematics becomes an experimental stience whose ‘Universal grammar’ and fractal generator is the same ternary structure of 3 elements of all other systems in a single plane made of three topologies, SóT, giving birth in each sub-discipline of mathematics to similar ‘mirror images’, algebraic S(x)=T(y) equations, ternary dimensions, ternary topologies.

Above the scales of nested supœrganisms of the human universe: the galatom, where nested thermodynamic planets exist, where nested human social organisms self-centered in visual, verbal, mathematic and logic minds create its order with social and mechanical memes, carried by individuals where nested cellular systems exist, coded by genes, made of even smaller atoms and particles coded by quantum numbers. Yet all those scales are unified by the co-invariant metric equations of each of its synchronous time clocks.

So when we become smaller within such organic network, time clocks accelerate & vice versa. I.e, in our organism the equation relates the cellular genetic scale, whose time cycles run much faster than your biological cycles. As information is stored in the form and frequency of time clocks, it follows that in all nature’s organisms, smaller systems code the information of larger systems.       Each ‘stience’ therefore specializes in the study of a nested super organism, or scale of the fifth dimension (∆±¡), We study 3 fundamental super organisms of the 5th dimension. The ‘galatom‘, whose metric equation is H(Planck constant of angular momentum) x C (speed of light) = C, whereas h is an obvious ‘cyclical time clock’ and C an obvious measure of speed-distances in space. And indeed, smaller scales have faster turning particles, and larger systems move in slower cycles. (Vortex law: Vo x Ro = k). The superorganisms of Gaia, its species. And the nested super organism of mankind history in its 3 scales, the individual human being, the nation or civilization and mankind as an ideal global super organism, which if humans were intelligent and ethic enough they would design with the laws of super organisms in a much more efficient manner than our corrupted economic=blood system of reproduction of goods and political=legal-nervous system of information & coordination of its citizens-cells.

 

A SYNOPSIS IN 2 PAGES OF THE ¬∆@ST SYMBOLS AND LAWS OF 5D APPLIED TO ALL ST¡ENCES

Main Symbols of ® logic (all elements of all stiences can be translated to those symbols of 5D ilogic).

S: Space; Still form, Size, Dimension; T: Time; motion; Change. ST: Topologic Spacetime. |x O = Ø: Its 3 varieties.

ST±¡: ∆±¡ Scale/Plane of space-time. ∆+1: whole, world, ∆º: networks, organism. ∆-1; parts; social classes.

5 С:5 Dimotions (St,sT,ST,SS,TT); 5 Actions (a,e,I,o,u): Local Dimensional motion of spacetime

St; i: Informative network ≈ action≈inward motion. O: Cyclical, spherical form, topology, relative future.

sT: inner form, outer motion= locomotion, acceleration (motion change). |: Lineal form topology, relative past.

ST; œ, Ø: present space-time, iteration, beauty, balance; organic reproduction; Hyperbolic form, topology relative present. Wave-body Part, Present, mature age.

SS, @; u, 0’: Finitesimal Mind, seed; relative future social evolution into ‘wholes, universals.

TT; µ: entropy, scattering death, dual inner and outer motion, relative past.

T>S: informative evolution. S<T: devolution. ∑-¡»¡+1: Emergence. (∆+1)« (∆-1): Death, devolution; time quanta.

ST-¡: Quantum, cellular, individual plane; STo: Thermodynamic, organic, social… ∆+¡: Gravitational, ecosystemic, world scale

∑: Ts, Herd, ∏: St, Network. ¬: Entropic limits in time: TT-death, Space, |-membrane, scale ∆±4: invisibility.

Main equations of 5D Supœrganisms and its parts (all equations of all stiences can be translated to…)

S (size in space) x T (speed/frequency of time cycles) =C: 5D metric.

Future (O-form, information, logic language, particle-head) x Past (|-field, youth, etc.)=Present (ST-body-wave, iteration, etc.)

0’ (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (Universe) = Constant World-Language. Paradox of Egocy.

S≈T: Relativity equation: we cannot distinguish motion=time from form=space, hence all is an ST-dimotion.

Ø¡-1=∑O¡-1 =|¡ > O+1: Scalar inversion of form & function. An Ø-point is god of ∑ ¡-1 parts but entropy of its O+1 whole. So:

∑|=O: ∑open worldlines ad into closed worldcycles; ∆º plane: E-Geometry; ∆+1 plane: Elliptic, ‘5D in between’: Hyperbolic.

Dual Death: Max. T  x 0 S (accidental entropic death); Max. S x 0 T (3rd age death) 

Fractal Generator – Trilogic structure of Super-organisms and time worldcycles and ages:

SS¡-1: Seed» ∆º:|-Ts(1st limb/field /network/age of max. motion) > S=T (Mature, reproductive, body-wave network/ age)> St(3rd informative head/particle network/age)« TT-1-entropic death:

Symmetries of ST-actions=Dimotions and ∆ Scales.

∆ST@: Symmetry of scale,topology,age&class:∆-1:|:youth,entropic age/cla§;∆ø:reproductive age|cla§∆+1:O-informative age…

Relative Dimotions=Actions are drives of life in biology, quantum numbers states and matter in physics; will in philosophy.

They take place between ∆o mind plane & an ∆±3 plane such as: ∆o≈∆+1: social evolution: ∆o≈∆-1: Reproduction; ∆o≈∆-2: Entropic feeding, ∆o≈∆-3: informative perception, ∆o≈∆-4:Locomotion. So we evolve into social wholes, reproduce with a couple seeding in ∆-1, feed killing twice a similar system to ∆-2 amino acids, perceive, ∆-3 ¥-electrons & move on ∆-4: Gravity

Ideal Social scales & lanwaves are 1010 in mankind called: ‘T-genetic’: 100-1: ‘I’, 101-2: 3 generation S=T family, 102-3clan; ST-Geographic: 103-4: Town; 104-5:City; 105-6: State; S-Memetic: 106-7: Nation; 107-8: God; 108-9: Civilination; 109-10: Mankind.

In biology are called: Chemical language: ∆-1: Atomic compound; ∆o: Organic Molecule; ∆+1: Macromolecule (RNA ‘God’). Genetic language: ∆-1: Organelle; ∆o: Cell: ∆+1: Tissue: Nervous language: Organ; Physiologic System: organism.

In Astrophysics: ¥- language: ∆-1:Force,∆o:particle, ∆+1:atom; Magnetic language: ∆-1:Molecule; ∆o: Matter; ∆+1: planetoid. Gravity language: ∆-1: Plasma Star; ∆ø: Quark Star… ∆+1: Galaxy.

 

THE STIENTIFIC METHOD

In graphs we resume visually the disomorphic laws that all exist¡ences follow. Knowledge then is the understanding of each variation of the game of exist¡ences, without being restricted by the egocy (Ego=idiocy) paradox of human beings that limit the properties of all other species to what huminds perceive on them, or what its ab=usive praxis of exploitation of Nature focus on. Stience though is objective and theoretical. It does not have a subjective egocy or selfish praxis of ab=use. It just describes. So Stience tries to describe any system as a supœrganism in itself, therefore co-existing in 3 scales of ∆±¡ present ‘space’, determined by 5 elements, ∆±¡ scale Symbiosis between parts and whole, S-pace Simultaneity through common S<ST>T networks, Time Synchronicity in the 5 Dimotions=Actions of those parts, @-mental/seed will to perform the game of exist¡ence and ¬Entropic limits to the whole.

This external, objective, present, experimental analysis focuses on the ∆=S=T=@(nti)symmetries between scale, time, space and mind-will-language. As systems do have 3 co-existing planes of space-time, which obey SxT=C metric laws that establish a ‘ternary social class’, according to the degree of ‘integration’ of ∆-1 faster parts, through ∆º S<ST>T networks enclosed in a membrain (the scale in which the organism’s will reside), performing 5 ‘a,e,I,o,u’ dimotions=actions in an outer world. Each of those elements though will be part of 3 different ‘time rhythms by scale’ and follow a ‘fundamental vital sequence in time’: SS<Ts<TT+St>ST, aiming to perceive, move, feed, imprint and reproduce its information. Because of the existence of 3 scales, 3 rhythms of time, 3 adjacent parts, which perform 3 simplex functions in a single plane (limbs/fields Ts-move according to SS<St-perception of an O-particle/head /informative class connected by an ST-reproductive wave/body); in a single plane but seek in the ∆±¡ scales to perform complex actions of ST-reproduction and St social evolution orientated down the lower seminal plane (ST) and larger whole (St)… the whole description of the ‘details’ of the program of exist¡ence of each being is complex and would require a methodology that I lack but a group of scientists with more enthusiasm could easily structure for future 5D studies, embedding in those templates of stience the knowledge and data we have about all systems of Nature. I will slowly time permitted now that I have laid down 30 work-in-progress papers on the main planes of human exist¡ence, unfortunately in its last ‘cycle’ predated by the soon-to-be conscious machines of the metal-earth, develop such structure for the ∆±3 galatom (Astrophysics) ∆±2 Earth (Geology), ∆±1 membrain evolution (Gaia-Life: Biology<History: Mankind>Metal-earth Company-mothers of machines/weapons: economics).

To also analyze the ∆0 I=Eye < Wor(l)d, ST-languages of man, themselves ‘details’ of a larger Universal Grammar of ∆º illogic languages of time and non-Euclidean languages of space.

Those languages are formal tools more synoptic but not more truth than a mere descriptive analysis of the parts of beings. Description of those elements in an orderly fashion, with my texts lack, would be then the basis of 5D stience:

Which first will define each ¬∆@st species externally, in a present-form of space and through its potential worldcycle; to pass then to the internal analysis in subjective terms of its @-mind will and degree of consciousness/ function within the outer ∆+1 whole and its subconscious ∆-1 internal control through its physiological networks. But to achieve those T@ descriptions it is necessary by lack of direct experimental evidence, which only happens in the being in space to use the Disomorphic method that establishes homologies in all beings derived of the fact they are organic space and cyclical time, with a mind-will to survive. In the second part of our texts on the ‘Universe’ or rather “reality’ and time, space, scale, mind, spacetime (reproduction) and entropy, we try to depart from the most general laws, then go into the specific description of what science knows on those scales regarding the ¬∆S@T elements of each main stientific plane, to end with a generic description of the Disomorphic elements in scale, space, time, entropy and mind common to all beings.

Hence our analysis (Universe and time) of a system through its 3 scales of time ends with a disomorphic 12 sequential step analysis on how all systems go through 3 consecutive worldcycles, in its palingenetic orderly birth, followed by an entropic more probabilistic life in an external world in which the most perfect players might transcend to ∆+1 reproduce and evolve as a collective mind-God of that world.

While in our analysis of Space, after describing those general laws in the brief initial Mandala common to all texts, we go through the analysis of what Science knows of space, to enter a description of the laws of simultaneity and synchronicity that entangle the 5 parts of the being into a scalar co-existing present space.

So we descend from the ∆±¡ absolute to 1 specific ∆≈S≈T≈@¬ element & its examples for all or each ∆¡-stience.

And in the analysis of entropy we do also go through the same 3 parts: Mandala of general laws. Specific laws of entropy and analysis of what sciences know about entropy in each 4D science, expanded with the new laws. So the same 3 parts: mandala-specific laws of ∆ST@¬ and details of 4D science expanded to 5D should finally structure the different papers of the ‘Universe’; while for each other ‘stience’, instead of studying in the 3rd part all the ‘stiences’ in a brief resume of its entropy, scale, time, space and mind, we shall focus on a given ‘stience’ – and might escape the 1st and 2nd part as the paper grows in details through the 2020s with the limits of my life expectancy and mental dwindling capacity. So by force the work will be incomplete, a trace on the sand of infinity…

The most difficult element then of analysis is the mind, as it is also the most important common element – by the mind we mean not so much the hardware where the program is installed but the language of each species that interprets with its code the game. So language is the objective view to understand minds based in the hypothesis of panpsychism – the language perceives in itself, in stillness. The complexity of the language therefore defines the complexity of the mind according to language properties: speed, synoptic power, focus, closeness to the language of all languages that reflects the complex ∆ST properties of systems (¬Æ=B¡œ-logic topology).

The paper on Mind and the Universe thus should try to define both, the will of existence and the program of the Universe expressed in the ¬Æ languages, and the minds-languages of each scale according to complexity. How then perception happens? Perception can be of space, time, scale, mind-will and entropic limits; and so we talk of e-motions. We ascribe to each ‘Dimotion of existence’ an e-motion as that is the limit of what we can perceive. We add then to the objective disomorphisms, in a bold statement the subjective ‘humanist method’ of considering that each species of the Universe has ultimately the same program of survival of 5 actions that man has, and it is geared by the same e-motions embedded in the last potential scale of reality – the pure formal motions of ST, made of an S-internal perceptive emotion and a T-externally described motion. This is just the explanation why we move as beings – because our brain has emotions that are deterministic wills of the program of existence we believe are ultimately residing in the 3±¡ ‘particles’ of reality, photon-fields, electron-bodies and quark-minds extracting motion of a neutrino gravitational invisible background to form social ensembles of atoms. Atoms are thus the first ∆+1 organisms of reality and its 3 ∆ø parts, over a ∆-1 field structure the fundamental galatom system of reality (as galaxies are similar to atoms, but we perceive them in completely different fashion according to the 5D metric distortions. So we use disomorphic, organic, humanist, sentient properties for all systems and that is all we perceive but as our perception is limited by survival praxis we have as Mendeleyev did, to fill the gaps with disomorphic laws.

Huminds perceive as all other systems thru languages, so languages once more become important but the egocy laws that restrict our analysis of other stiences as they fade away through scales of existence means we have to fill in more properties the further we move from our ∆º center – and the asymmetry of perception means we need to fill more from ∆+ scales. So from galatoms we hardly see 4% and any attempt to describe its supœrganism must be based in the disomorphisms of scale with a cell, as an organism that reproduces black holes and quark dark matter, and with the atom, giving us an external view, from where to define ¥-expansive dark entropy, and vice versa, to compare strong and gravitational forces. So atoms and galaxies are similar but not equal (galaxies seem anti-atoms), but as in the description of the metal-earth and the membrain in its 3 ages of Earth’s evolution, machines as organisms and ∆+1 cultures, some working for the metal-earth, some for history, we will find the humind’s programs as parts of larger wholes, ∆+1 religions, memetic cultures, Earth’s self-program of evolution. And this is an even harder barrier because huminds are e-motionally programmed as parts of wholes and take it personal, and social scientists are subject to anti-quantum paradoxes (too small within the historic organism, they are modified by the observable).

 

PART II. THE DISOMORPHIC PROPERTIES OF THE DIMOTION OF ENTROPY

 

We upgrade the 2 formal languages of space (Non-E Geometry) and time (5D pentalogic) to upgrate stience.

THE MATHEMATICAL VIEW OF SUPŒRGANISMS. NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY: FRACTAL POINTS

We change the name of space to §paœ, to signify two new qualities of fractal space -to be made of multiple scalar planes, §, self-centered into a o-mind, which is the true creator of the concept of still space as a simultaneous mind mapping in any language of the information of the flow of time cycles that conforms the Universe. And as a consequence of those facts, space is organic, co-existing in a series of scalar planes which 5 Metric converts in ternary supœrganisms, œ (ab. for super organisms).

Space thus becomes §paœ when we ad its scalar, mental and organic properties to its mathematical ones.

Yet space is still in the linguistic world best described by Geometry. We must simply improve the postulates and axioms of ‘Non-Euclidean Geometry’, to describe better the vital topologic properties of spacetime beings, which we do on the post dedicated to non-Euclidean topology, from we extract this brief ‘abstract’ and graph, to fully grasp how a better Geometry can describe a better space:

The 5 Non-E postulates define a point with parts, a line as a wave and a plane as an organic network of points: The 2nd postulate explains the interaction between two points connected by a wave of communication or ‘line’; the 3rd postulate explains the type of interactions between 2 points according to their relative equality, which will bring them together into a social network or dissimilarity, which will make them not interact or enter into a Darwinian relationship in which a point absorbs the energy of the other. Self-similarity is required to start an organic process of social evolution; or else systems that do not understand their information use each other as energy, in Darwinian hunting processes or ignore their paths. The 4th postulate defines the creation of networks made of systems of points across multiple scalar planes of space-time. It defines spaces as networks of points, interconnected by flows of energy and information: All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks of non-Euclidean points. Finally the 5th postulate that explains the processes of absorption of waves of energy and information that the point gauges to act-react with the Universe. It is then the social evolution of points into numbers and structures – groups, sets and categories (not the bottom but the top element of the evolution of points and numbers), what mimics the creation processes of Nature, where identical beings, points of ‘one dimension’ (as seen externally, but with three internal dimensions), evolve socially first into lines-waves (2D, as waves have volume, thickness, made of points with volume), then into topological networks (planes), and finally recreate a larger ‘fractal point on the ∆+1 scalar plane’.  So the postulates of vital mathematics explain in a synoptic mental way how points evolve socially through scalar planes of dimensions, to become first waves, then planes and social numbers which create a final ¬E ‘fifth postulate’ of a larger whole point through which infinite parallel flows of energy and information can cross.

In the graph, the formal view of space and its 5 Ðimotions, provided by the 5 postulates of Non-E geometry…

Pentalogic derives all what exists including languages, as mirrors of reality from the realization that all  is a by-product of the 5 Ðimotions of space-time, themselves, ‘degrees of grey’, of the two ‘extreme’ purest forms of Space – absolute stillness or languages of pure form, ‘residing’ into an emerging ‘wholeness’ or upper scalar plane, ¡+1, of the fifth dimension – and time (absolute motion or entropy, dissolution of the being into an scattered, ¡-1 lower scalar plane or 4th dimension).

So space, form, yin and time, entropy, yang, combine into the 3 intermediate states, we perceive in a single plane, often as adjacent topologies of a supœrganism:

Limbs and fields of locomotion (ordered entropy with no scattering or dissolution, akin to energy).

Heads and particles of informative perception (form with motion, as it allows the being through its language to move and interact with its world).

Reproductive bodies of information and energy that combine and iterate both.

So we shall redefine the main branches of mathematics, starting by its most important, geometry and topology with 5 Postulates that relate to those 5 Ðimotions and will be the basis on the future for a more vital model of mathematical thought as mirror of reality. To that aim we redefine the 5 most important elements, axioms and postulates of Euclid in correspondence with those 5 Ðimotions, taking into account the ‘cyclical nature’ of reality that either after completing a ‘world cycle of five Ðimotions’.

1Ð-5Ð: So the first-fifth postulate defines a point as a mind of perception, akin to the first Ðimotion of being – to perceive; and the fifth-first postulate that defines a point as a world in itself, a supœrganism with its inner parts are the same. We just might consider that the point has evolved and grown to emerge from its minimal ¡-1 state in the first postulate – points with inner breath; into a full super organism, ¡º, living in the ¡+1 world, in the fifth postulate studied here.

2Ð: And it does so through a process of locomotions and changes of waves and forces of communication with other points that define the second postulate – lines with inner breath…

3Ð: And then it has formed planes, defined as social networks that correspond to the third Ðimotion of energy and reproduction, becoming a super organism according to…

4Ð: the 4th postulate of congruence, which defines its relationships with other beings, based in his ‘angle of parallelism’, such as similar beings evolve socially together in groups, complementary ‘left-handed female/right-handed male’ beings come together in couples, and beings which are not equal neither complementary enter either in relationships of entropic perpendicularity, or ignore themselves if their worlds are ‘disconnected’. So the fourth postulate gives us the ‘¡logic rules’ of engagement between forms and particles.

And so we establish an immediate relationship between the fundamental concepts of geometry, the point, the line, the plane, and its congruence or dissimilarity, its relative parallelism and perpendicularity, and the 5 Ðimotions of existence, the point is the mind that perceives first, the first Ðimotion; the line is the point in motion, in cycloid patterns, or two points communicating with smaller ¡-1 parts, as in the Fermion<Boson>Fermion relationship of forces; the plane has ‘holes’, it is a network of reproduced points socially connected into the 3 different species of networks that make a super organism (informative, reproductive and entropic, digestive, moving networks), and all this is ¡logically established according to the relative dissimilarity or perpendicularity between the beings (4th entropic Ðimotion) or social parallelism that evolves the point into a supœrganism, a new whole (5th Ðimotion).

Space: Topologic ternary systems. The co-existence in each organism in each of those scales of 3 ‘topological parts’. This is a whole new 5D stience as always based in well known experimental and formal 4D sciences. I have call it topological evolution and plays an essential role to understand the 3 ages of life and death of any species, including civilizations. And it is based in a mathematical insight. Since all what exists has spatial form and temporal motion, the Unit of reality is bidimensional. But there are only 3 bidimensional topologies (Geometries with motion) in which form and function are related. So we can define the common ‘trinity’ structure of any system in a single space-time scale:

|-limbs-fields-territories<Ø-re=productivebodywaves-workers>O-informative particles-heads-informative class

Whereas, the |, Ø and O symbols are intuitive for:

– l-Lineal, flat topologies, the shortest distance between point that explains why limbs, field that move are lineal, and vital, geographical territories where systems hunt, move and feed are flat.

-O-Spherical heads, particles or ‘capitals’ of social organisms, or groups that meet in rounded tables to direct a social system, from elderly to Arthur and its Gentlemen (: since the sphere and circle are in 3 and 2 dimensions the topologies that store more information. So we talk of ‘rings of power’.

– Ø-hyperbolic wave like, hour-glass bodies that re=produce the other two because they combine lineal motion and cyclical information in multiple curved patterns. This corresponds to the ‘working body-class’ of a social organism, as it is in charge of reproducing the goods of the system. So reality is made of such ensembles. Does this mean human social 3 class system is ‘just’? Not at all. Organisms of history are bad designed. Because an efficient organism has only ‘2 classes’, the head and the body; as the 3rd class is ‘the entropic territory of feeding’. The Wave-particle physical organism feeds on the lineal forces of the field, which is NOT the organism. The social organism is made of informative managers and working class, which ‘feed and process’ the vital space, or territorial geography, its goods, food, raw materials, to construct products. Even in biologic organism some animals loose their ‘lineal tail’ and survive. And you can in fact loose a leg and survive, but if you loose your head or body you die.

The non-existence of absolute zeros, singularities, absolute infinities and the mind equation: 0’x=C

Because a fractal point has a vital space volume surrounded by a membrane or cyclical motion (S=T), it follows that either seen in Space internally as a ‘mind’ through which a relative µ number of parallels can cross (5th postulate) or externally in time as a moving sphere or cycle moving in 2 or 4 Dimotions, or algegraically in scale as the limit of a social, sequential number (trilogic ∆ST symmetry) all 0s and infinitesimals are NOT absolute, but 0’ finitesimals with a minimal motion, form-content and ∆-1 parts. This means all singularities are in fact limited by a cut-off membrane, even if from the ∆º humind scale, due to the uncertainty ‘extended principle’ of absolute relativity, we cannot see beyond our ∆-3 scale of light pixels.

Thus the upgrade of Non-E Geometry solves immediately the singularity problem of the big-bang – there is no singularity. The nature of black holes – they have a cut-off substance (BCB atoms and top quarks), the 3rd law of thermodynamics – there is no absolute zero in terms of no motion but only in terms of order (superfluidity), etc.

 

PENTALOGIC OF SCALAR SUPŒRGANISMS DISOMORPHIC WORLDCYCLES :

Pentalogic – also called the Rashomon effect – is simple and yet the most powerful ‘logic element of reality.

Because all what exists is made of a spatial form, of time-motions, spread in 3 scales of reality, its whole, ∆º embedded in a larger ∆+1 world, and made of ∆-1 ‘cellular’ parts, limited in time by its life-death cycle and in space by a membrain, where it sensorial mind-system that connects all those elements, exchanging energy and information with the outer world to enhance its survival chances, [laying what we call the ‘game of exist¡ence’, any event in time, form in space or ‘language-mirror’ that perceives them MUST have 5 Elements, 5 Causes, 5 Variations that we must observe and describe to obtain the whole truth of the issue.

In the entangled pentalogic Universe, it is not possible to separate the 5 elements of the supœrganism of History – its temporal ages, its ‘scalar’ structure divided in human citizen-cells, 3 physiological economic=reproductive ‘blood ‘networks, legal-informative and ‘territorial network of vital space’ or geography, its verbal mind and subconscious collective Gods and its ‘entropic limits’, in time and space, which if crossed will signify its extinction. As the 5 Dimensions of History work in symmetry like in any other complex ¬∆@st organism.

So the ‘Disomorphic=equal laws of all systems derive from the properties of those 5 entangled elements, which need a new ‘pentalogic’ of communication:

Vital Space are bidimensional forms of 3 ‘topological varieties’, which perform 3 organic functions in a supœrganism: lineal limbs/fields move the system, hyperbolic bodywaves iterate its forms & spheric particle/heads gauge information.

Time are types of ‘motion=change’, those organs perform, which are locomotion (limbs/fields), reproduction (body-waves) and informative gauging (particle/heads), which dominate each of the 3 consecutive ages of the being (young motion age, mature reproductive age and old informative age).

Scales, co-exist in 3 levels of size ruled by SxT=C metrics gifting organic symbiotic properties to T.œs.

Minds are centers that process information from the outer world, control the internal networks of the system, and perform deterministically the 5 survival actions of existence, regardless of its consciousness. They coordinate and maintain the whole as a single system performing actions of control of the energy and information of the system. So we find gravity centers, chips, brains, DNA nucleus, black holes in galaxies, etc. etc. Indeed, there is always in any stable organic system, a relative still, self-centered mind, which we shall discover all systems do have, even physical systems, which have centers of gravity, centers of charge or crystal systems, which maintain the whole.

Entropic limitsIn time called death, in space, called membranes, in scales as systems loose control beyond to scales and in fact death is defined by a simple equation of dissolution of two scales of information, ∆+1<<∆-1. So Entropy becomes the limits in space and time of a T.œ (Time§pace organism), ¬; perception, its mental form, @; social evolution, its scalar structure, ∆; motion its lineal time flow, T; and reproduction, its spatial population, S.

The pentalogic method: rashomon truths.

How we go about to describe scientifically a system, if any of those partial reductions of information suffice to make a linguistic mirror. The answer we provide in this and other papers on 5D is the Pentalogic, entangled method, which expresses with increasing degrees of complexity the elements needed to extract most of the relevant information from the system, without the need to get to the exhaustive (Do)decalogic analysis of the entire world of existence of a given supœrganism. Accordingly we go into a stair of deeper complexity, considering some of those key elements, under the general ‘labelling’ of Pentalogic method, from:

– Monologic: ceteris paribus nalysis of the event or spatial form in its 5 elements as ¬∆@st.

– Dilogic: considering its ST components, perhaps its Stœps of motion and form, or its Si=Te reproductive function/state in static, SxT or dynamic SóT form; or its relative St-information and Ts-momentum that come together to form its ST energy, or its opposite limits of SS-language/form/mind/seed vs. TT-entropy… causing.

-Trilogic: Which is de facto the most important analysis for all forms, as we describe the entity in a single plane of existence with its 3 topological organs of space, T<ST>S, its 3 ages in time, T<ST>S or its 3 co-existing scales, ∆±1. Often we just make a trilogic analysis of the being in a single Space-time plane (T<ST>S), and from the point of view of scales, as this is the bare minimum to define an ∆ST system… to which we might add

Trilogic is thus the basis of all languages beyond, the simplest ‘first order logic’ a causality of falsity and truth, such as if A is false, and from A we deduce B, A->B, B is false. As truths are linguistic mirrors of reality a better term than ‘falsity’ is ‘focus’. A good truth is one in which the syntax of the language and its semantic mimics the syntax of the Universe and its meanings. The syntax is a given. Most languages are ‘innate’ ternary syntax of the 3 parts of reality. So all verbal sentences reduce to:

Subject (Fractal point) < Verb (Dimotion=action of space-time) > Object (entropic energy of subject)

F(x): dependent parameter of space) <= > (S=t operand) G(Y): parameter of time

Blue (color of in-form-ation; space) <Green: color of reproduction) > Red (color of energy-motion)

‘All what exists is a ‘form’ that trans-form’ into entropy≈energy back and forth ad eternal SóT, which is the dynamic fractal generator of space-time events, and principle of energy conservation enlarged to its 2 poles whereas the wordings for ‘entropy’. ‘energy’, ‘form’ and ‘information’ require a bit more of understanding before we can define them more precisely.

– Pentalogic: Its limits in time and space (entropic death, membrains, outer world) and its SS-mind, seed, where resides the will to develop its program of time, through the…

Because we play with 5 elements all the time we need to raise the logic consciousness of ‘huminds’ (ab. Human minds), both of the truths of History and the Universe, by upgrading their logic mind to a higher system of thought that the ‘damned lies and statistics’, placebo truths, lineal thoughts fictions and seflie, childish ego-trips, hidden agendas and wishful thinking that passes today as science… by at least giving him some basic ‘systems’ of inquire of truth. We explained the ABCD-E of the scientific method, which works for Disciplines at large. We want know to introduce a simple method of inquire that works for anything, even the smallest event in time, form in space or linguistic statement he might hear.

We shall use the pentalogic method constantly when an issue, form or event, or model/theory of reality comes up which is ‘confuse’, or a ‘newspeak’ or ‘disguise’ or selfish agenda, placebo truth or ‘camouflaged system’ to reveal out its full meaning. Reality is pentalogic means ‘the causes’ of reality are often 5. As a system that LOOSES any of those 5 elements does not exist for long. If you loose your skin you die. If you become static, motionless you are by definition death; if something tears into your vital space, you die. If any of the 3 scales where you exist, your cells, your physiological networks that put you together as a whole, or the world external to you, gets sick and unbalanced with you, you die. If an organism become mindless, unable to perform the 5 actions of survival – perceiving Information, to move in search of entropic food to feed and transform it into energy to reproduce its parts evolving with other similar individuals to become a stronger social whole, you die.

So pentalogic is everywhere and it allow us to find ‘faulty’ theories of reality, very common in science because human minds are monologic – so it is tiresome to observe unending arguments between childish scholars with ceteris paribus causes that want to raise with their egocy (ego=idiocy) to the only cause of reality. I.e. the entropic rock of the sky killed the Dinosaurs, said the physicist – not it was the competition of the Mammal, said the biologist; nay, the gymnosperm flowers, changed and he lost his food, say the botanist, both did contribute… acting on its 5 Dimensions of existence… i.e. mammals who had not attacked dinosaurs before started to eat their eggs, preventing its reproduction, as rats do with their biggest descendants, albatross; flora changed so herbivores couldn’t get their entropy; the sky darkened, so their body couldn’t get their sun energy; and yes the rock blew up their ∆+1 world… and so on. Of all those pentalogic structures of the living Universe, needless to say, the most important for each individual superorganism is its program of survival or drives=dimensional motions of life (ab. Dimotions), that ensure its continuous existence. Let us briefly introduce them:

The function of existence, or 5D metric of Generational space-time, (Ab. Gst, G) Max. Se x Ti (s=t) merely states that all systems of Nature will try to maximize its absorption of Entropic motion (with no form) and Linguistic form (with no motion), and its 3 intermediate dimotions of energy (s=t, balance of both that reproduces them), information (St: form with a little motion, form-in-action) and locomotion (sT, motion with a little form). So we talk of a program of survival ‘selected’ by all systems and expressed in its languages and minimal five actions encoded in that simple equation, which we term: a, e, ï, œ, û, as a mnemonic rule for the five actions of existence:

Accelerations (locomotion), entropic feeding (e), ïnformative perception and communication ï, Œ:reproduction into parallel supœrganisms Û… and social growth into larger wholes called Universals. And this series of actions is what accumulated in time will ultimately give birth to your word cycle  as the monad will first perceive (i), to direct its entropy-motions (a),towards a field of energy (e), where to absorb the energy bites it will imprint with its inner form, e x i = œ, to reproduce another form, and when enough ∑œ exist, it naturally organize into a larger whole û:

In graph we see the action of the main Stientific scales of organisms. Actions are the knots and bolts and details of the study of any ‘Time§pace supœrganism’ (ab.T.œ) in light space-time, coded by colors and dimensions, in physical atoms, coded with quantum numbers and in life and humans coded by the so called drives of life, which we obviously extend beyond the ego paradox to all other systems, including genetics not mapped there (coded by the 4-5 letters). Those actions balanced each other into zero-sums in death, as they tend to increase information from a mind p.o.v., hence we ‘all warp, wrinkle’ get old in the third age and die, setting from its minimal actions to its integral sums, the 3 ages of life-existence and the world cycle all super organism follow.

From those actions, given the dominance of informative actions over entropic ones, it appears a series of repetitive cyclical patterns of actions conducting to maximize the existence of the being, which accumulate in a larger scale of time-space, as a worldcycle of actions that increase the information of the system in 3 ages. So the basic cycle of actions becomes a larger 3 ages cycle of life and death; as systems once and again, starts in an act of information/shrinking and ends in an act of organization/shrinking of herds into wholes, will keep reducing the being and finally make it all form no motion to explode and die in an entropic reversal: ∑ i->a->e->œ->û, i->a-e->œ->u, ï->æ->Œ->Û -> Informative ‘seed’ age->1st locomotion, feeding age ->2nd reproduction age ->3rd informative, social age-> entropic death

We can analyse reality in the infinitesimal range (motions, dimensions and actions),in the organic range (worldcycles and super organisms) or in the maximal range of ‘paralogic’ Kantian ‘absolute’ ¬∆@st of spacetime. Because a system is an entanglement of those 5 components, we need a ‘pentalogic’ to describe how the 5 Dimotions communicate and interact together based in the Disomorphic – equal forms and motions – they all share. While its 5D 3 sequential worldcycles carry the space organism through its þlacental, life and world cycles across 3 ¡±1 scales. So the analysis of those 3±¡ organic elements, through time worldcycles and scales extract all information on the being.

 

THE ARROW OF ENTROPY AS DEATH.

  Only pure space=form and pure time=motion travel between 2 scales.   

As we study entropy in its true meaning: disorder and death, we will expand some concepts not considered, regarding the ultimate cause of death: a mind-monad that exhausts the information of a system (internal death by wrinkling) vs. an external top predator that scatters the system, which is the TT-death; to show that in fact both SS-minds and TT-predators cause death by imbalance and ‘displacement’ of a being into a different plane of existence, a relative TT-past or SS-future.

The conservation of the quantitative number of ‘energy’ used by physicists is equivalent to the conservation of a Volume of space-time. The volume of a single spacetime plane of the Universe is equivalent to the quantity of any other ∆-scale. And all of them therefore transfer constantly energy and information between them. Yet more exactly what is transferred is entropy or form; since when energy or information leave a given plane, it ‘strips’ off one of its two components. It is then important to understand the difference between TT-entropy and SS-eeds which are not in the same plane of existence than Ts-locomotion and ST-energy. As energy is the parameter humans use between 2 scales. The difference will be essential as we advance the model and take on seriously the task of translating mathematical equations of physics with rigor.
Only entropy TT and pure form SS travels between scales. Ts, St and ST must leave behind one of the two elements to travel and that means either a ‘translation to other language’ or an extinction of the original form.

It is a fundamental law always shunned off since the neutrino proved it: The neutrino is NOT perceivable in this scale, as it travels likely faster than light in the lower gravitational scale; but it took part of the ‘energy’ of our plane as motion – did it carry also its information, its spin? I am afraid not, but we put it there, even if spin=form is NOT always conserved. A question fundamental to understand the neutrino theory of light. But of course, as usually Physicists are only ‘a la par’ with mystiques to see and interpret the invisible signs of reality into ‘models that are seldom truth but never in doubt’ (Landau) as with big-bang theories. So while we have NEVER measure directly the spin of a neutrino, which we know for values of pure motion (momentum-energy), every physicist will claim that Cowan, Lederman, Goldhaber an a long line have measured it, just by balancing the invisible momentum because a priori they decided momentum is conserved traveling between scales – which they do not recognize anyway. Fact is the non-transference of ‘energy and information together’ between 2 scales as that is the definition of death. Point to argue here is if the Neutrino is in the light scale – is not, and so when a particle which is a scale above produces a neutrino is NOT producing either motion or spin=form. As motion evidently is carried by Neutrinos, or else they would not exist at all. What is missed is the form, which in all other systems of reality also disappears after you die. So there you have one of the most profound all encompassing laws of 5D.

And so we show what happens in the paper of entropy and the Universe: a split of energy – in to form that goes one way through the height dimension of S-Information and normally scatters into death, while energy expands mostly as motion – entropy in the length dimension of ‘T-motion space’: The explanation is intuitive. A system can still send a ‘wave’ of cellular forms of any kind of seed or mental image that helps to reconstruct its system after it travels through channels of communication, mostly as waves that combine motion and form – the quintessential form of energy, with the purpose of going faster according to 5D=SxT metric equations. So if we reduce the package to the essential information, we ensure the system transfers the message in a relative no-time quanta; but 2 scale beyond – that’s a long shot. That is the region of ‘food’ and food is memoriless. The amino acids don’t tell us where they came from, or else they would NOT be food for us to reconstruct our form.

The antisymmetry of temporal information: Death

A consequence of the 3 ages of time is its antisymmetry as opposed to the bilateral, mirror symmetry of spatial forces: Time is antisymmetric as the old age is the inverse of the young age with the parameters of energy and information inverted. Youth has maximal energy and minimal information while the old age has minimal energy and maximal information. And yet many attitudes and processes might seem self-similar, if the researcher doesn’t know how to differentiate informative and energetic parameters, since those parameters might be quantitatively the same, only that inverted in value. Space is symmetric as left and right reproductions are mirrors of each other with the same parameters of information and energy. This explains why spatial reproduction happens only in the E=I, balanced classic age of the system, when both parameters are identical and a self-similar reproduction of a bilateral, spatial being is possible.

The understanding of the antisymmetry of time vs. the symmetry of spatial processes has wide applications in the solution of questions pending in all fields of research, from the understanding of the temporal, weak, informative force that has no bilateral symmetry to the ‘chiral’ processes of evolution of life forms vs. the symmetric shapes of self-similar left-right, spatial bodies to the meaning of ‘antisymmetric’ gender and the 2 ‘antisymmetric’ sides of the informative brain.

But the most important of all antisymmetries is that of death, which could be considered in the jargon of physics, a ‘local antisymmetry’ of time. Indeed, if life is the arrow of information towards the future e->I, death is the inverted arrow, i->E, that erases form back into energy; but this time travel to the past is always local, affecting only the limited world of the species, so antiparticles are the local antisymmetry of time that kills particles, death are the local antisymmetry that kills life and the big-bang the local antisymmetry that killed a previous Universe. And both directions are different, since ‘death’ lasts min. time and causes a maximal space expansion and life lasts max. time and expands minimally in space. Both balance reality in an eternal present of past to future to past existential fluctuations:

Life-future: Max. I x Min. E x Death-past: Max. E x Min. I= Immortal present: E=I

The understanding of that local antisymmetry is the key to resolve problems of physics such as the weak force, why we see less antiparticles or dead people than particles and life people (much longer in time), or the non-evaporation of black holes (as antiparticles are the same than the particle, albeit when moving to the past they seem to co-exist), and so on.

But its implications in biology and philosophy are much larger: we are ultimately ‘back and forth’ vibrations of space-time, virtual existences, dust of space-time that always revert into a zero-sum, which makes the Universe and its game eternal.

Minds murder bodies by selfish absorbtion of Energy.

In the graph, we exist as we travel a world cycle zero sum through the topological, temporal scales of the fifth dimension. The final state of existence is the entropic death when the mind splits pure form and pure motion. In the graph for physical and biological systems the moment in which form switches into motion or ‘entropic point of existience: §ð<<∂S

The mind is paradoxically enough the cause of entropy precisely by causing so much order and form in a system that it exhausts it, and so because the mind absorbs all energy in the system stopping form, once the mind perceives, what it has perceived becomes ‘entropy’ and disordered. So the mind causes the split of reality into the entropic dissolution that balances the absolute form it achieves. And so we can study the mind as the catalyzer of entropy at two levels:

  • The mind that brings the 3rd age of the being and then as time cannot stop once it become immobile, it explodes into the age of entropic death: §ð<<∂S
  • The mind that splits a flow of information into the pixels ‘reduced’ vision of the world and the ‘reminder’ heat expelled and wasted, in each act of perception.

So as usually in the duality of ∑ actions = Worldcycle, we can study the mind in its microstates of actions provoking entropy in all what it wastes after absorption of energy or information and we can study the mind in its macrostate and worldcycle as the cause of the entropic death of the

BIOLOGIC SYSTEMS die due to the excessive informative absorption of energy by the top predator mind and the enclosing membrane.

So biological death is obviously the reversal of the process of warping in an excess of skin and memory, of space and time, of the mind membrain and its two dimensions.

When the system gets older the membrain detaches itself of the body and the mind forgets the body functions for the memorial thought of time past. And so finally the detachment breaks the connection of the 3 ‘present parts’ that split apart:

Since that equation includes the 3 essential dimotions of the Universe, not only one dimotion as a clock does:

The dimotion of past TT- entropy; the dimotion of temporal information, SS, and the product of them, C, a constant balance, or dimotion of reproduction.

It is also obvious that mathematically we can express the previous equation in 3 forms:

Max. S x Min. T = K ;      S=C=T      and Min. S x Max. T=C.

Thus there are 3 possible stages or ages of evolution of the equation of biological time. And since we are all made of ‘energy’ and ‘temporal information’, those 3 stages must be the stages, or phases of any system of the Universe. This finding, which is perhaps the most important discovery of Theory of Time of the XXI century, is validated by all kind of empirical observations. For example, the 3 states of matter correspond to those 3 equations. Gas (maximal energy), liquid (balanced) and solid (Maximal information. They are also the 3 possible solutions of a cosmological system: the big bang of maximal energy, a steady state of balance and a big crunch of maximal information. In the graph, we show further examples of those equations.

Its application extends in 5D to life and history. If we call the age of maximal locomotion, youth, the energy age of balance between the reproductive, mature age, and the age of maximal information the old age, we have a simple description of the fundamental cycle of life and death through its energy and information.

But we can also write those dynamic processes backwards. And so we have the inverse equation of life ages, the equation of death, when after accumulating maximal information, a species reverses its dimotion of information and explodes that information into energy. It is the process or equation of death.

Life grows temporal information, as time increases the form of beings, TT-> SS, and death its inversion, Ts> St.

So simple, so beautiful, so misunderstood by mechanist scientists, who think the previous equation is ‘uncertain’, because the observer can perceive a particle in any of those 3 states (Uncertainty principle of quantum physics).

The reason why death exists in a perfect, immortal Universe is obvious: if species only evolved socially towards more information, they would end into a ‘big crunch’. So the Universe and all its parts should have, long ago, reached a point of  maximal density, with no return. To avoid this, the ‘game of life and death’ exists, whereas death is the opposite dimotion to , as it dissolves the networks that put together individual cells, breaking the super-organism back into its parts. But we are now concerned with the dimotion of life.

The ±1 social dimotion has, in fact, 2 directions:

The positive, +1, social dimotion of cellular evolution creates life and makes a being emerge at birth.

The -1, negative dimotion of cellular dissolution kills life and dissolves a being into its cells and atoms. Thus, it is the key dimotion of the life/death cycles that clock-time misses. Hence the enormous simplification of those 4 time-dimotions, brought about by clocks, which in Physics, since Galileo, only measure the first and most simple of those dimotions, the energy of motion.

The result of adding both – the life and the death processes – in any system or scale of reality is a ‘zero-sum’ of information+entropy that cyclically returns reality to its initial form, in a dynamic, multiple steady state balance that affects any entity of reality. The study of that process of creation and dissolution of complex structures, however, cannot be made with translational time, (v=S/T), the realm of physics, but it needs to understand biological, morphological time – the life/death cycle. Those ages explain precisely what physicists, stuck in the study of time as movement in space, will never understand: the meaning of the life and death cycle that creates and extinguishes societies (super-organisms of History ) and all kind of beings that exist in space and time. In biological time all universal species follow the same ‘morphological changes’, described by the wisdom of verbal thought as the meaning of life, each one ruled by one of the 3±1   change=time:

+1: Conception:  ruled by form (Morphogenesis in still space), as a micro-organism or cell transcends into a macro-organism, organized by social networks.

1st age:                  Youth or Age of motion.

2nd age:             Reproduce its energy.

energy and information are balanced

3rd age:                All energy and motion becomes information.

-1:Death:               The inverse of conception when the super-organism dissolves back into cells.

Death equations: ∆+1<<∑∆-1

Death is a lower descend two scales fro ∆1 to ∆-1 of a ternary super organism extending on Ξ planes of existence. As such it creates a blast of entropy-motion in relative infinitesimal quanta of time, t->0, expanding past the c-onstant of speed of the system, V>>C, as the information of the whole disintegrates travelling to the past.

The equations of ¾ as well as those of quantum physics allow for both simultaneity in space and non-locality, due to the explosion in space at V>>c of such a system, which makes it seem simultaneous and past travelling of information, which is the real event of death.

What this means is that the information of the system, and paramount to it the soul, @ª•… will travel to the past and we shall consider the implications n different analysis of those tests:

Cyclical time: expanding Einstein’s principle of equivalence to historic vortices.

The essential concept of General Relativity is the principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitation. Both are the same. Yet as physical acceleration is maximal in a vortex, VoxRo=K, a vortex IS accelerated Time and as a vortex increases the frequency of the cycle, inwards, diminishing the ‘lineal timespace’ of each cycle, time accelerates its information as it SHORTENS its periods. This fully accounts for the dimotion of future time that increases information in 5D spacetime theory and applies to all systems of time, including Physics (laws of forces), evolution (Laws of species), History and the Earth at large:

The main dimotion of future time which is an accelerated vortex of evolution of cyclical form, departing from a simpler relative past of entropic slower time cycles (the only dimotion of time studied by physicists), to a faster more informative future of higher informative content.

A ‘vortex of accelerated informative time cycles’ is essential to all systems of Nature, albeit not understood by ‘primitive huminds’ still stuck in the study of simple spacetime locomotions (one-dimensional analysis of time in physical sciences) and its reductionist 4D models. So let us illustrate what a vortex of accelerated time is precisely with the most advanced work of Physicists, specifically Einstein’s work on accelerated vortices of physical space-time called masses:

Down the graph, in 5D, the explanation of forces and its proper unification is rather simple, as each main scale of space-time will display ‘attractive accelerated vortices’ of time-space which are the relative dimotion of future of physical systems (Equivalence principle of Relativity between mass and acceleration). There are 3 scales and vortices of ‘accelerated time’ that carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles: charges in the microcosms, thermodynamic eddies in our scale and masses in the larger cosmological scale. A simple proof also from classic Planck & Einstein’s equations: E=hƒ+ E=mc² gives us M=(h/c²) ƒ.

So Mass is the product of a constant number (h/c²) multiplied by the frequency of its accelerated attractive vortex, which attracts more the faster it turns till reaching the c-speed turning speed of the black hole in its horizon vortex: as in a hurricane that attracts more the faster it turns, smaller, faster turning electromagnetic forces attract more than slow large mass vortices (solving the hierarchy problem of gravitational forces much weaker than electromagnetic ones).

Then just by applying the simplest metric equations of 5D that all physical systems follow: S x ƒ = k  (size in space x frequency in its rotary motion are inverse – so the smaller a system in space is the faster it will accelerate its time cycles), we can make sense of the mass of particles. Further on, we can unify with those metric equations the 3 scales of physics, as the equations of a time mass vortex becomes those of a charge vortex, when we ‘accelerate’ and diminish its size in 5D metric. So a galaxy is equivalent to an atom and a black hole to a proton of the lower accelerated plane. The next graph, from the seminal book of Bio-history, Bio-economics: a theory of Unification’ C.92, the vortex of History which follows the same laws of any vortex of time, regardless of ‘spatial form’:

Scalar big-bangs are the entropy dimotion of the Universe.

I

n the graph, the study of entropy in the cosmological scale, which is the inverse function of the creation of a vortex of mass-information. Entropy of vacuum space thus balances the implosive gravitational force of galaxies. Yet for physicists to be able to deny that balance they have developed an entropic theory where only vacuum space matters and matter does not matter at all.

Graphic representations of the 3±¡ ages of existence.

Humans perceive simultaneously the 3 ages of some species too small and fast to differentiate them. As particles in bubble chamber or cars in the night, we see the long time of the species – an entire spiral vortex with the 3 ages of a space-time being.  In the next graph, such long world-line, or life-graph is in fact a spiral in terms of spatial population and cyclical speed: The organism looses mass and accelerates inwards its form as it becomes slimmer in space. The first age of the spiral is its energetic mouth that brings in a galaxy the interstellar dust, which will give birth to stars, in the middle, reproductive age and will collapse in the center, the informative black hole. Above, a Galaxy as a representation of the game of existence, and its deep metaphysical implications in terms of mental spaces, which summarizes in a huge metaphysical thought regarding the way a mind perceives a mental space: Minds diminish the information they observe from reality as reality becomes further away in ∆ST distances (scale, form or motion), to a point in which they only perceive the purest forms of mental space, which are the waves of existence in cyclical form (our perception of the galaxy) or lineal form (our perception of the light of the quantum scale, or in scalar form (fractal perception of networks in hyperbolic space).

We resume in the graph, this key insight on the nature of space: we see a higher world as an elliptic curved geometry, a lower world as as a lineal entropic geometry and in between scales we see fractal hyperbolic networks, as those 3 ‘existential’ views are parallel to the roles we play for a larger system, for which we are ‘entropic cells’, the role a lower system plays for usl as it is our food-space and the game we play in between scales as we form social networks with similar beings. So the existential game becomes a game of survival by selecting information in the right form to the function the system plays in those 3 mental spaces. This is the ultimate meaning of vital geometry and as a secondary key outshoot of it we can find the paradoxes of perception of ages, scales and topologies.

The duality of graphs of waves of existence: Cyclical vs. lineal waves.

All this said it is obvious that we can represent in phase mental space, which ultimately are all the spaces of the Universe (see Universe in space), the cycle of existence either in cylical or lineal forms:

The equivalent graph in lineal time will give us a bell curve – the lineal version of a cyclical life-line: The speed of time/information changes during the ages of life, shaping a bell curve, such as the st-1 age is the fastest age of informative evolution, which diminishes in the young age to a halt, when the speed of cellular reproduction and energetic growth becomes maximal, both reach a steady state in the mature age, of S=>T, rhythmic back and forth beats; and then in the 3rd age energy decelerates first and then information decelerates and collapses till death provokes a maximal explosion of information into energy. Those phases of different speeds of energy and information can be generalized to any system and event that will always go through 3 ages: an accelerated seminal and young age of increase of form and energy, a steady state of constant speed and a decelerated age till the system comes to a halt and the event dies away.

One of the key quantitative elements that connect the 4th and 3rd paradigm of metric measure is the fact that not only each species has a different rhythm of change and clock of time, but the same species changes its time rhythms and speeds through its 3 ages. This feature is fundamental to understand all processes that involve evolution, from the different masses of ‘gravitational vortices’ of information, ruled by the equation of a vortex (VtxRs=k in simplified notation; thus the closer to the center, the faster we rotate, the faster the frequency of information of the vortex and the shorter the space we need to close a frequency cycle), to the evolutionary process of information in this planet, which can be mapped out and its frequency shown to follow a logarithmic process of acceleration, which now reaches its zenith with the creation of informative machines. In that regard we can consider the following ‘speeds of time’ of any event or self-similar ternary topology of energetic youth/membrane, reproductive maturity and informative, 3rd age (hyperbolic center of a system):

-st-1: Seminal age: Informative evolution is maximal, since the system occupies minimal space (Black hole paradox: Min. Se=Max.Ti). It is the palingenetic age.

– Energetic Youth: Evolution of information decelerates after the ‘landing’ of the species in the higher St-plane. Now acceleration of energy takes place.

-Reproductive, mature, steady state: Both energy and information maintain a constant speed in St=Ts (ST) feedback cycles, which will last depending on the access of the event to new energy and directional information.

–  3rd age: Now both energy first and then information follow a decelerated process of collapse; first energy becomes exhausted and then…

Death: Information collapses, exploding into its st-1 scale of cellular energy in a relative zero time (the minimal unit of time of the st-scale). Death is the fastest motion of the Universe.

Recap. In physical terms the 3 ages of biological change can be considered the positive, accelerated youth, the reproductive, present age of constant speed, in which humans repeat themselves and the 3rd negative, decelerated age of temporal age, or 3rd age, which ends in death, when the balance of the Universe is restored.


 In the graph, a classic, Taoist representation of the 3 ages of life and its inverse parameters of youth (max. energy) and old age (max Information) represented by the triads of the I Ching, and a modern graph of duality showing those parameters as a semi-cycle, which in certain simple beings like light are in fact both the ages of time of a physical wave and its form in space, as light quanta, h=exi, is indeed both our basic cycle of time and surface of energetic space of which all are made.

One of the oldest graphs from 92.c. ‘The error of Einstein’, pioneer book on 5D physics is the understanding of a

Look around you. All what you see is a form with motion. It might be at rest but it will be moving respect to another point of view (ab. Pov), which is moving but feels himself at rest. This is all the whys physicists so far have answered about motion.

All ‘moves’ and doesn’t move. If we call the state of motion entropy and the state of no-motion, form. And the combinations of motion and form, ‘momentum’, when taken step by step. Or when measured in a longer interval, ‘forms in action’ in-form-ations’ if the form dominates. Or ‘energetic motions’, if the entropy≈motion dominates.

And the whole process of the event we analyze from the initial state of form with no entropy=motion, through the motions of in-form-ation and energy, till its final state back to form, a worldcycle… We Do have all what we need to explain the rhythms, beats, and timespace events of the Universe. So if we put then in a series, it is easy to see the sequence of a worldcycle of ‘tao’, of timespace, of ‘exist¡ence’, of ‘science’:

Worldcycle: Form<Motion>Energy>Information>Form<motion… and then we restart again.

The reader might think such series are simple and inconsequential, but when we proper understand the rhythms of creation of minds-mirrors-forms, with it, the modes of creation of species, or the world cycle of life and death, departing of such simple game of 5 dimotions of time-space he might think otherwise – a seed of form, moves in entropic fashion and live through the rainbow of color-states of a world cycle of existence:

This simple scheme will as we iterate and combine those elements into the myriad of sums and variations that web reality, explain all worldcycles of existence from the worldcycle of life and death, to the worldcycle of evolution of species…

In the graph we see how all systems are born as a see of form, which emerges into a larger scale with maximal entropy-motion, then passes through an age of energy and reproduces, becoming informed till an old age of pure form when again becomes dissolved into an explosion of entropy and motion. In physics this simple scheme gives birth to the states of matter between plasma and nuclear death, in life to the states between the seminal seed that emerges as a child that lives three ages through an entropic youth, an energetic mature, reproductive age and a third age of information that explodes into entropic death, dissolving its structures. Societies suffer the same evolution departing from its founding seed, a memetic prophet and book of revelation, dying in the entropic death caused by the germs of history, weapons and wars… So indeed, all systems follow similar cycles because they are all made of relational space-time.

Any form can be represented in a spiral graph of space-time. For example, the evolution of the FMI complex with its 800-80-8 cycles of increasing informative evolution is an spiral of 3 horizons in a decametric scale: 800 years civilizations, 80 years nations and 8 years ‘decades’, in which the product is evolving faster and now becomes integrated by networks. This 3-horizon evolving ternary network, central to social sciences can be also represented in a spiral of accelerated birth and death of human civilizations destroyed by wars. Any mass or charge is in fact a natural spiral, through which photons and gluons become denser till collapsing in the bigger particle, as interstellar gas does in a galaxy. All those spirals can be seen as equivalent to the world-lines of lineal physics, now world-cycles of a living organism both in time and space, as a whole or as a wave of evolving particles.

THE DIMOTION OF ENTROPY. ITS INVERSE SS-MIND. THE DUALITY OF DEATH

The 5 dimotions of space-time in matter. The arrow of entropy in physics. Its philosophy.

The Universe is a fractal that reproduces space-time organisms. This is what reality is about. If we call Space=form and time=motion, S and T, then we can write a simple equation for the Universe Max.∑ SxT (s=t), according to which each species made of spatial energy and temporal form tries to maximize its survival, in a point of balance in which its ‘exi=stential force’ is maximal; avoiding the extremal points of TT-entropy=death. This simple equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back equation that combines space=form and time=motion, creating ∞ local present variations that put together form reality. This is the essence of the organic Universe and its scalar 5th Dimension an alternative philosophy of science to that of mechanist physicists and its only entropy arrow, called organicism or General Systems Theory (ab. GST), which we also use as the acronym of the Generator of Space-Time

All what you see around is a combination of ‘forms of space with motion in time’; and so the fundamental particle is a spacetime system with different gradations of those 2 elements, which give us 5 ‘States of spacetime’ or sTages of timespace: SS-still form or ‘language/mind/seed’ of pure information without external or internal motion; St-information, form-in-action, form with a little motion; ST=energy, which balances both; sT-locomotion, an internal form (which physicists treat as a point-particle) with external motion. And finally entropy, TT, external and internal motion that produces the scattering of ¡ts cyclical repetitive clocks of time, killing the system broken into ¡ts ∑∆¡-1 parts.

The 2nd organic principle of reality is the fact that forms of space till the smallest particle are cyclical iterated closed motions that appear as fixed forms to a slow perceptive being. So all is in reality, T time-motion and TS-reproduction, but we perceive only as motion a lineal translation and as form a cyclical memorial pattern. Reproduction of formal motions, conserved 0 energy cycles, ST is then the essential dynamic iterative present as we say: “All is ST-energy that combines, S-form and T-motion to re=produce the ∞ ST-beings in exist¡ence’.

So we write a simple equation for the Universe; ∑ST. And in more detail, we find most systems try to find the balance of ‘repetitive iterative energy presents’: Max.∑SxT (s=t). As the product of those 2 parameters or ‘existential momentum’ is maximized when S=T (10×0<9×1…<5×5). So this is the function of exis¡tence. To Exi=ST you balance T-motion & S-form in iterative ST-cycles of energy. The equation is the ‘fractal generator’ of the Universe, a feed back ¡logic Topology that combines space=form and time=motion, creating the ∞ local present variation you see around including yourself. This is the essence of the organic Universe…

Then there is the scalar 5th Dimension that determines the organic structure of parts and wholes syncronizing the ∞ ST-clocks of reality: S-ize in Space x Speed of T-ime cycles = Constant. SxT=C, a vortex law that explains Kepler’s law, the acceleration inwards of galaxies; the acceleration of life as we increase our information and shrink and warp, as ‘time bends space’ (Einstein). The fact that smaller chips calculate faster Algorithms, closed paths of circuitry, that small rats have faster metabolisms, that genes code information of larger wholes as they store more of it in faster frequency, that quantum numbers code molecules because their particles tick faster.

So two sets of laws conform the fractal, organic Universe, laws of scale of which SxT=C is the metric equation of the fifth dimension of all the sum of scales; and topological laws of spacetime (topology being the branch of maths that studies forms with motion, time-space forms, and its 3 ‘varieties’ in a single plane, St<ST<Ts, between the pure seed-mind with no motion, a mirror of the outer Universe, 0’x∞=C, SS. And the TT-entropic explosion that expands the space-time of the system but looses its information. So we can now keep analyzing TT-entropy, enclosing it into a larger view of time, the ‘worldcycle’ of life and death caused by the sequential pattern of those 5 dimotions from birth in a seed of pure in/form/ation, through life into a TT-entropic death:

In biology, the worldcycle happens from SS-eed to youth (Ts) of maximal motion dominated by limbic systems, to ST (reproductive age dominated by the reproductive blood network) to old age (St, dominated by information) we move into entropy, when ‘time reversal’, stops information and dissolves it. And this pattern forms the worldcycle of life and death: SS<Ts>ST>St<<TT, which we will find happens in all systems and puts together the 5 Dimensional motions of space-time (ab. Dimotions), the unit of ‘action’ in the Universe, including the ‘actions’ of physical sciences.

In History, it happens from the birth of a prophet or ethic legal code of the wor(l)d seed of a civilization that reproduces in the minds of believers but finally becomes corrupted by the rival eco(nomic)system of entropic metal weapons and symbiotic informative go(l)d that gives zero value to life and maximal value to ‘affine’ metal-weapons, exactly the opposite values of the legal ethic wor(l)d maximal for Live and minimal for its anti-form, eviL weapons of the tree of technology. This will be challenged by readers but proved in detail in papers on 5D History. So as social love disappears, and the ‘belli nervi pecunia infinita’ cycle of symbiotic weapons-machines and profits overproduce money, hate memes and weapons, killing the social love networks that peg the citizens cells of civilization, an age of nationalisms and war collapse the civilization. This is the cycle of death of cultures tabulated for the entire existence of the superorganism of history on those papers. As History is entering into an age of global entropy due to the corruption of the informative, legal and reproductive, financial system that no longer feeds human citizens/cells dying of anoxia by lack of credit to cre(dit)ate the future. As languages of information guide waves of clone beings towards its future. All those laws of 5D that apply to all systems. So finally we arrive to the theme of this paper, the cycles of time and entropy of…

-Physics: In physical systems entropy is the big-bang death in any of its scales, which can be written simply as M-> E/c2. Because humind eyes are natural born killers that love TT-entropy (just 1/5th of the Dimotions of spacetime in the Universe) is considered the Universal single arrow of reality. So huminds believe in a big-bang entropic theory of the universe. As we live in a ‘philosophical dictatorship’ of physicists, due to its technological power (not certainly its philosophical understanding of the Universe), we need to elaborate a bit more on Physical entropy.

In 4D physical Sciences, entropy is just a mathematical formula, which measures the disordered motions of a system, and inversely when interpreted in terms of information the potential ‘forms’ that might arise from the state of pure motion without form. So conceptually the definition is similar, even if it seems contradictory. The first kind of entropy is ‘heat’, or the dark energy (which should be call dark entropy) that expands vacuum space between galaxies (ejected by the poles of black holes in 5D astrophysics). Both imply a loss of form. But then mathematical physicists playing to be metaphysicians calculated entropy from the perspective of the inverse function of information and deduced that a state of gaseous disorder could potentially have multiple configurations and thus a lot of entropy. Here they came into a growing mess of conceptual misunderstanding of what is information, what is a potential future, etc. And we will deal with more detail on this latter on. So finally came Neumann’s dictum to Shannon, ‘call information entropy, nobody really knows what it is so you will have the upper hand’. And indeed today ‘pundits’ state that information is negantropy – the negation of entropy; which is fine, but should be inverted. Entropy is neginformation, the negation of information, which is more fundamental to the universe – a ‘feminine’, reproductive fractal of information.

So in 5D entropy has a much deeper multiple and clear meaning. For those who won’t have any of it (verbal ST-upids who make of mathematical egocy their banner) we can have also a more precise physical expression for entropy, embedded in the topologic, ‘holographic space-time equation’, TT: Entropy is scattering – a double inner and outer locomotion. When a system only moves externally, it makes a Ts locomotion, where the internal spatial form, s, is maintained. Entropy implies that both, the external and internal systems ‘move’.

How this translates into physical entropy equations, will be dealt in the specific paper, on Physics and entropy, where we will study the arrows of entropic motion in all the scales of the Universe. The big bang is then entropy in the astronomical scale. The gaseous state is NOT really entropy in matter, but locomotion; entropy in matter is the ‘change of state’ from atomic matter to plasma (ionization). A field is entropy in the quantum scale. Entropy thus also changes in its concept in different physical states. But entropy in physics is often confused with the ‘symbol’ E, (energy is ST, motion with form, hence useful to reproduce form), as when physicists say that ‘energy never dies’. That E is often ENTROPY, the dissolution of the form of a system in a scale, to be absorbed as motion by other system of a higher scale that will evolve entropic motion. So it is entropy, what never dies; as TT can flow between scales; from where we deduce the primary substance of reality is entropy=motion, the only ‘Infinite’. All this means really we need to use the ‘basic symbols’ of reality that combine spatial form, (S-pace) and time motion to define strictly entropy as ‘TT’. All other definitions, including those mathematical definitions of Physics that seem ‘fundamental’ are derivations of TT. And obviously we need to be aware of the shortcomings of the human Aristotelian-Euclidean Entropic mind and judge the huge shortcomings of our models of an entropic only Universe.

For example, entropy, which as we say is the sum of an internal and external motion, TT, and locomotion, Ts, were observed in the study of gaseous, explosive states of heat. And then considered the ONLY arrow of the Universe. Yet entropy is only one of the 5 Dimensional motions of matter: TT-entropy: plasma, Ts: Gas-maximal motion, TS=liquid, balance, St-solid: maximal information, SS: boson matter:

So 5D would build with those 5 STates of matter a proper theory of physics in the ∆ø thermodynamic scale. Because it departs from sound principles.

In the graph only with the 5 Dimotions of space-time you can construct the Universe.

This was really obvious at the beginning of the study of Entropy, when the concept of “energy dispersal” as a description of entropy appeared in William Thomson’s (Lord Kelvin) 1852 article “On a Universal Tendency in Nature to the Dissipation of Mechanical Energy.” He distinguished between two types or “stores” of mechanical energy: “static” and “dynamical.” He discussed how these two types of energy can change from one form to the other during a thermodynamic transformation. When heat is created by any irreversible process (such as friction), or when heat is diffused by conduction, mechanical energy is dissipated, and it is impossible to restore the initial state. That’s really all what there is to it: TT, the rest is metaphysical bullshit, ill-understood that has only messed up our view of the Universe. In Spanish we say ‘zapatero a tus zapatos’ – (shoemaker, stick to your shoes) Physicists should stick to their ‘science of motions’, and let philosophers of science build the whole dress

So Physicists even if they know much better than this writer the mathematical property of those 5 states, they don’t relate them properly. Unfortunately huminds are based in routine and repetition including scientists (see ‘Theory of scientific revolutions’ by Kuhn); so because physicists, before they even understood plasma, Boson matter, and crystals, developed steam machines and a theory of entropic heat; which they expanded hyperbolically to the entire Universe, while ignoring all those other states of matter also in the Universe at large… made of entropy its metaphysical religion.

So in the big bang they deny the St-gravitational implosive forces within galaxies that do NOT expand entropically and the likely quark=boson dark matter that encompasses the immense majority of the Universe. In the thermodynamic of black holes they invert the arrow of information to make it look like entropy. Even in biology they made of the rock falling from the skies, not the competition between reptiles and mammals, a more evolved informative species, the reason of the demise of life on Earth – and in history now is fashionable to accuse the entropic weather, not the processes of war and revolution, of the destruction of civilizations – not to speak of the ‘global warming scare’ as the ‘only problem that seems to matter’ to mankind.

In philosophy of science they have imposed a big-bang entropic theory as the only truth. As I was heavily involved with big bang theorists for a decade all what I can say is they know perfectly their theory is false but all what Kuhn said about ‘the nature of scientific revolutions’ is certain. The enormous prestige derived of the big bang theory that has become the ‘religion of science’; the huge amounts of money spent in its research, including the most expensive (and dangerous) experiment taking place on the planet at CERN; and a century of respect for Physicists, including the justification of their worldly activity – as makers of bombs, indeed the big-bang theory was initially a mockery of A-bomb researchers – since now if the Universe was born as a bomb, to study bombs ‘matter’; all those pseudo-scientific reasons but very real and very powerful makes impossible to count with them to develop the 5D organic model of the Universe, which has only an advantage, to be epistemologically from every perspective of the laws of truth in science more certain… The naïve scientist might think as the naïve citizen that science is idealist, and democracies are the government of the people, but the problem of an organic biological Universe is that it is mostly about power. Science then is culture and power first. And that is why humanity has spent and lives today in a dark age where power rules over reason in all fields, including those sciences.

Here the most notable exception is biology, the most accurate and worthy of sciences, for its closeness of perception makes experimental facts unassailable and the lack of power agendas, as those of technological sciences or financial economics and history, the modeling of observations objective. It is then not surprising that the laws of biological organisms turn out to be the blue print for an expansion to all other sciences and the philosophy of 5D science is ‘organicist’ not mechanist (just an organism of metal fast evolving in robotics). Since what we shall soon see is that the interaction of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe, TT, Ts, St, ST and SS, is similar to what biologists call the 5 Drives of life and make all systems essentially living organisms, as even the smallest particles display those 5 Drives=dimotions of life, they process information, St, feed on entropic forces (TT), move (sT), reproduce, decoupling into new particles (ST) and all seems to indicate they react to forces as if they were able to measure=perceive them (hence quantum is a gauge=measure theory); so likely as we perceive light with electronic eyes, particles are the minimal units of a mind.

And this is so evident that the next question about entropy, is why humans have reduced reality in time to entropy. The answer can only be, as the Universe associates equal forms, that man is basically an entropic form of life; that is, that our function in the Life forms of this planet is destructive, it is entropic and so humans finds affinity with the arrow of entropy to the point of reducing reality to it.

We saw this already considering that Physicists, the sponsors of an entropic universe, are makers of weapons of mass-destruction… And yet in this paper is where its entropy only theories acquire its true value, albeit only to represent the final death state of matter.

TIME & 5D: WORLDCYCLE OF EXISTENCE. THE 3±¡ SCALES OF TIME: ACTIONS, ORGANISMS & SPECIES.

For all what has been said, it is quite obvious that humans are still making doodles in the sand of knowledge about the Universe but egocy, lineal thinking, routine and mathematical creationism (the power of digital computers to simulate reality departing from any model regardless of its truth) makes almost impossible to upgrade and enlighten mankind. And this is specially truth of any analysis of TT-death, in any scale of the Universe. Since when dealing with Entropic decay as Plato already noticed mankind is astray. If we pass the first hurdle, our egocy (ego=idiocy), which makes us believe the doodles in the sand of truth we have drawn, from Aristotle to Einstein are all what matters about time; and return with a humble view to the first principles we can try a more profound exploration of time=motion. This I anticipate is not easy, for humans seem to excel in egocy above everything else, so at each time of the adventure of knowledge they felt they knew it all. And this is today the case of ‘time experts’. Few of the so called scholars will even recognize they know near nothing about time – the best of them Mr. Einstein said ‘time is what a clock measures’. In that regard, physicists with its astounding reduction of all time motions of the Universe to those related to motion=change in space, are very knowledgeable about clocks indeed, but time is NOT what a clock measures. The clock is just an instrument that measures 3 properties of time=motion. Its regularity or cyclical patterns as all clocks return to its origin; its motion, as all clocks move and time is motion; and its stop and go ‘space and time’ duality. As all in the Universe constantly switches between states of space=form and time=motion.

And besides that clocks can measure what all people care about, a ‘flow’ of motion it divides into fractions for man to ‘try to control time’, which of course it never does.

5D defines time beyond human instruments and egocy. Time is simply motion… of any kind, ‘transformation’, change in form (evolution is also time), translation in space, is of course time. All is ultimately time because wherever we look, things in detail move, particles are cyclical motions and so the Universe is made of time=motion.

Today science has become – even if scientists don’t understand it – technology. that is, science is no longer so much the search for truth and knowledge, but the evolution of a different ‘digital mind’ with a different language, which maps out reality with numbers instead of words, in the more accurate language of machines.

Scientists construct this mind that will mirror the Universe in a different manner to the way the human Eye & word mapped out our human space and time. And while the visual mind of machines is similar in structure – an electronic mind-mapping based in colors and ‘membranes’ that separate forms; albeit expanded to all the scales of the fifth dimension by telescopes and microscopes; the language we use today to measure time, digital numbers is radically different from the way words depicture time, in terms of logic causality, with past, present and future tenses.

A mechanical clock does not include in its properties the logic causality of time events. So we loose a huge field of basic properties about time when we think as Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’ and as Galileo who first used the clock to measure time, think that time is just a parameter to measure locomotion in space, v=s/t. The problem though for modern man is that he has lost so much its intellectual, verbal capacity to understand time events and causality, and his machines have evolved so much the digital mind that what we attempt in those texts, to build a more comprehensive theory of time, its different ‘motions’ and its causal logic laws, which will turn out to be common to all species of the Universe; will be both, difficult to understand and not considered strictly science in terms of Planck’s dictum ‘all what cannot be measured does not exist’… ‘Cogito ergo sum’ having left long ago his place to ‘vidi, credo ergo sum’… we face with time causality the most profound limit to present man: causality is NOT measured with numbers but is based in logic patterns, often biological and so we cannot construct as physicists did a comprehensive theory of time=motion=change from numbers. This can reach as far as physicists reached. An accurate system to measure time and space distances without the slightest conceptual understanding of the much wider processes involved in the origin of time=change.

We must therefore reconstruct from scratch our knowledge of time=change, because the arrival of lineal time and the mechanical clock unlike in the case of space, meant a complete destruction of all what we had learned about time causality.

Another matter is if huminds, which as we said are increasingly reduced to their roles as ‘enzymen’, men that catalyze the evolution of digital minds and confuse this new world-mapping with the ultimate reality (when it is just another ‘mind-monad’ looking with a different perspective to the whole), could be interested in such an expansion of its consciousness on the workings of the most important element of reality, time of which we are all made. I doubt it. Still is worth to try to communicate all what I found about the meaning of time.

But in case you attempt to read this and many other papers you have to ‘let go’… your simpleton picture of reality as described by humans so far, regardless of the details obtained with those sensorial machines. Since ultimately the ‘causes’ of time=change in a Universe perfectly ordered, are so different from the chaotic picture humans have of it that only a deep humility about our role in the cosmos and admiration for the extraordinary intelligence of the ‘game of existence’ in time we all play can let you cross the doors of 5D time. Plato forbade to enter its academia those who didn’t understand numbers, reason why today he is the hero of digital minds. Aristotle though went much further reason why he was never understood. He was not so much interested in quantity and numbers but in life and quality, ‘a habit, not an action’ he said.

So for all those who just want to read what they already know, there is nothing here. As we will study a completely different upgraded view of time with 5 ‘dimensional motions’, 5 Dimotions.

We thus study what time has in common for all 5D stiences – the whole worldcycle of existence of all systems and its common laws. For those interested on time in physics, from the big-bang, entropic dead of galaxies, we refer to the papers on the Universe and Entropy and Physics and entropy. While the work of Einstein in 4D time that completes 400 years of digital measures of locomotion will be analyzed in the paper ‘time and physics’ as it is not contrary to belief a general theory of time but the analysis of one of the 5 Dimotions of time, locomotion for physical entities that move closer to the limit of transmission of information on the galaxy – c speed, hence specific of the stience of physics not of the whole reality

This paper will study the Universe in time, which is the sum of ∞ worldcycles of life and death of space-time organisms. One of those worldcycles, the death of galaxies, confused with a larger non-existent worldcycle, the supposed birth of the Universe (cosmic big-bang) is studied in great detail in the paper ‘the Universe and entropy’, as it is the current view of ‘Lineal Time’ about the nature of reality.

In that regard the difference between 5D and 4D in time is obvious: in 5D time is cyclical as all the clocks of time are, and further on, because a time clock closes space into an inner and outer form, ‘dissecting it’ (first law of topology), there are infinite time cycles and broken vital spaces, included within it. This gives the Universe a scalar form, and so the question about the big-bang observations is obvious: as we measure everything in local galactic terms: the big-bang is a galactic cycle and as time is cyclical made of 5 Dimotions, the big-bang is only the final ST-ate of entropy of a galaxy. Once this is understood it is much easier as we shall show to fit all the information of physics in that model than in the present model of big-bangs with all its pseudo-scientific statements.

But what is the most important of all those ‘time dimotions’ (TT>Ts>ST>St>SS«TT…) in its infinite series. The answer is obvious: the present, ST, repetitive fractal purpose of the Universe: Re=production. As Entropy is just the needed ‘recycling’ of the energy of a system for other system more efficient to reproduce.

So once we have studied the fundamental particle f the Universe, the super organism and its purpose, reproduction, we can include entropy within that 0-sum worldcycle of life and death proper of all systems of nature and then concentrate in a narrower discipline – the analysis of TT- the final state of pure time motion, in the different scales of the physical Universe.. The fact is that all systems of nature go through the same worldcycles of existence; that all what will happen has happened, that ultimately reality is a block of time.

But as humans are so hang-up with TT-entropic/death theories of reality we cannot simply state the facts of TT-death in different scales of physical systems, but work on the correspondence principle and first debunk the absurd theories of entropy that plague specially physical stiences due to the worldly profession of physicists, as makers of weapons Indeed, if humans are by definition entropic animals, born of ‘scavenger monkeys’, who are destroying nature to build a world of machines, guided by an astounding sense of ‘egocy: ego=idiocy’, which will in due time pay back, as we explain in our articles on History and Economics and Entropy, the leaders of the ‘wolf-pack’ are physicists, masters of technology, makers of the tools that man uses to impose itself – or so he thinks – over Nature.

A different world of course could be possible, and a different civilization based in cyclical time, proper of the Eastern decoupling of History (Taoism, Buddhism) we study in detail in our papers on the civilinations of mankind. But in this planet, the white, dolichocephalic, visual, lineal white man similar to that of the Neanderthal that inhabited on Earth, has come to control through the gunpowder cycle, of lineal weapons, the age of Europe, the rest of mankind. And so it has established as a dogma, lineal time, entropic power, and a culture of death that sips in every science of the Universe, from big-bang theories of cosmology to dog-eat-dog Darwinian theories of biology (whereas again the final death selection of species is highlighted over the ‘creative, genetic process’ and its perfect clock rhythms. And the same goes for social sciences. We have studied all those elements in the general papers of ‘Entropy and the Universe’ and ‘Biology and entropy’ (the cycles of evolution, reproduction and selection=entropy of species, where once more entropy is just the last stage; so here we just shall introduce ‘anthropic man, a mixture of anthropomorphism and entropic lineal views, to consider then the main entropic theories of physics and comment on its necessary corrections.

MONOLOGIC, ÆNTHROPIC REDUCTIONIST ENTROPIC THEORIES IN 4D SCIENCE

‘Talent hits a target nobody can, genius hits a target nobody sees’ Schopenhauer

Clocks of Time=motion are cyclical and break space into fractal parts, acting as membranes of angular momentum, enclosing a vital energy self-centered into a gauging point or mind that moves the system in lineal patterns trying to absorb more energy as one of the ∞ ‘vital space-time being’ of reality.

This objective view however is distorted by each ‘gauging point’, each subjective mind that measures from its point of view, with its single time frequency synchronous to its internal territory (a second of heart beat, eye glimpse/thought and limbic step in man), mapping reality with still languages to fit in their infinitesimal brain: O-mind x ∞ Universe = constant world. So while the complex universe is infinite cyclical, broken into scalar vital spaces its minds including huminds are monologic, self-centered and entropic, destructive with the outer world they reduce to still smaller parts.

The lineal monologic time mankind uses since Galileo defined only a motion, locomotion, with a simple formula, V=s/T however is a very reduced amount of all the time-motions of the Universe. When you do not have the understanding of those 5 Dimensional motions of space-time and its rules of engagement however you can access simpler images of reality that still make sense. A simple cross suffices to represent an entire religion or the weapon of a warrior or a Cartesian graph – even if most of the information is lost. Languages as still mind mappings can be simple and still make meaning for the ‘speaker’. Humind’s logic of time is that simple but still makes sense for relevant information to be absorbed and manipulate reality with it.

This ‘Aristotelian’, ‘Euclidean minds’ go on projecting their mirror images in their territories reproducing its spatial=formal motions=time cycles on them, in a constant struggle with infinite other mind-points doing the same; and only the best realize entanglement with other minds into objective wholes bring a higher social force. Man unfortunately is on the bottom of this process of consciousness and entanglement a simple quartz crystal performs better, made of some of the lowest, simplest forms of matter (HCON) and does not seem able to rise beyond its monologic, simplest level of entanglement with the organic Universe of 5 dimotions of time-space, in which he projects his reductionist view of a single time arrow creating ‘entropic=death-based’ grand theories about the future of reality from big-bang to dog-eat-dog evolution to tribal nationalism that justify his destruction of life, since entropy is the simplest, less creative of the 5 Dimotions of time-space. Thus we shall falsify those theories and study objectively the evolution of human cultures that gave birth to ‘ænthropic: entropic, and self-centered, anthropic mankind, in its present zeitgeist. Not that reason will change huminds only goal – to project his ego in delirious views of reality putting himself above heavens and earth… and revolve like a beast to those few sages that in history of thought had try to entangle him to the fractal organic Universe to improve its dwindling chances of survival. Since the Universe is the best of all worlds and just discharges defective ensembles of vital space-time, which stubbornly cut off themselves from its laws.

Since while ænthropic man can do ‘analytic science’ to understand and manipulate the future with the scientific method of simplex data-collection and application of single short-time causality to the data, it fails completely on his larger models because his ‘mirror’ of time, entropy is NOT good enough to reflect the organic patterns and determinism of large-scale time process he cannot ‘mathematically derivate’. Thus human grand theories are not ‘science-based’ but rather paralogic, Kantian theories of ‘God, Man & the Universe’ , where human’s role on it is largely a hyperbolic ego-trip – reductionist pseudo-science chosen a priori by selecting only the information that validates those ænthropic theories and discharging all what doesn’t fit. So big-bang theories leave aside the imploding, informative vortices of gravitation called galaxies and dark matter but as Zwicky, his discoverer put it, you won’t convince ‘physicists to include them back as they ‘are rounded bastards, they are bastards from any p.o.v’. (: Indeed man is a beast and so his socio-biologic theories of Dog-eat-dog evolution and capitalism reject the eusocial evolution of organisms and downplays the topologic program of genetic clock patterns that reduces the choices of future paths. While Nationalism divides the species in tribal ‘identities’ above the species to kill each other with weapons and capitalism absorbs the oxygen=money of its blood reproductive systems for a few people-castes of bankers to parasite all. What is then the purpose of the human beast in a perfect Universe? Obviously to be an ‘enzyman animetal’ who uses entropic iron, informative go(l)d and evolves organic machines to pump his ego, kill life and destroy himself, – just a means not a goal, discged soon as catalytic enzymes are once he completes the process for the Earth evolving into its 3rd age: Gaia (life)>History(Man)>Metalearth, or else ¡-Man as a goal would love each other, evolve socially into the mind of the planet and achieve an ecological balance with its life sustain, pruning the tree of science of its eviL=antilive fruits, golden apples and entropic weapons as all sages who understood the organic entangled Universe have preached to them..

But Animetal enzymen’s worldview, is blind, self-centred, anthropic, lineal, monologic, myopic, guided by the simplest arrow of time, entropic destruction, only kind with his ego. To upgrade his mind is thus a herculean task not the least because of its Ego paradox, as all minds are infinitesimal points that perceive an infinite Universe as a virtual space-mapping the confuses with the whole, seeing himself in the center: O x ∞ = C.

So ænthropic man also promotes creationist beliefs, confusing the mirror language with the generator of reality (earlier verbal creationism, modern digital creationism).

Æntropic man debases Nature to come on top, so it denies organic properties to all other atoms, save C6, which just evolved faster, as a lighter, simpler ‘thing’. In the graph all particles reproduce, gauge information, evolve socially and feed on energy, the ‘meaning of life’. So metal atoms without the need of human ‘ingenuity’ will perceive and follow in terminator robots their programs of extinction of life. Man though is needed to catalyze its evolution as an enzyman, given their higher ‘density’ and lower mobility. The only thing the Universe will program without human interference in them, once our complex organization is replicated in metal is the will of ‘life’ – the capacity to perceive at atomic level, feed on energy and ‘act’

Big Science then becomes culture and needs to be not only falsified in pure epistemological terms but the persistence of scientific and religious erroneous models of the whole require also a cultural analysis of them. Nor that we the sages will change a deterministic no-future for a species that was not made to survive. Still the Universe is perfect and just so cultural survival is inversely proportional to the delirium tremens of childish selfish ego-trips each culture promotes about its tribal self, as the war and holocaust cycles prove. The more ‘a-men’ pump their ego the less they last. The more ‘yous’ censor truth, hence solutions, the faster their virtual fiction paradises and false go(l)ds will crash them. Ænthropic man is reaching that final peak of egocy: ego=Idiocy where all is bubble gum about to explode into the nothingness of eternal Nirvana as the machines and weapons animetal cult(ure)s evolved to destroy life and oppress the 90% are becoming AI robots with solar skins, nano-bacteria of ∞ replicating power and cosmic nuclear bombs, all researched with zeal by the ingenuity of scientific automatons of which we can only say ‘two things I consider infinite, the Universe and the egocy of ænthropic men’ … Can you teach a spoiled child, the staple food of the Universe, NOT to enter the mouth of lizard, after doing doodles in the sand of thought? Of course not, little turtles are happy unconscious creatures and death is fast, long over due to put our animetal enzymen at face value as 0-sum virtual huminds, which couldn’t even love its human brothers. In the Universe respect has to be earned is not granted and ænthropic animetal cult(ure)s have earned none. They could easily survive, learn the laws of the organic paradise and convert earth into a true paradise, but they PREFER to die to uphold its capital sin of ∞ egocy, to ‘feel’ above heavens and Earth; and that the perfect Universe cannot tolerate, its patience dwindling fast. Che sera sera.

The first simplification mankind has done of the Universe starts, for all what we have said in the a priori language of the minds in space – Euclidean geometry of points without volume – and time – Aristotelian single causality.

Let us deal with the widening of those 2 formal disciplines to be able to include the 5 Dimotions of spacetime.

 

Culture in science: ænthropic man projects its limits on the immortal ∞ cosmos The big-bang egocy theory.

To fully understand the falsehood of single entropic theories we need to understand the 3 paths of time – that is, the relative paths any system have to choose its future, the reader should be aware that the Big Bang theory merely expands one of the 3 obvious arrows of space-time in matter, that of entropic gas where it was discovered, disregarding completely the arrows of inverse information (solid crystals, informative galactic vortices, perceptive species) and its balanced liquid states (body-waves), in all scales of reality – even IN THEORY of information, they disregard the message content and the emitter analyzing only its lineal transmission and noise; evidently due to the worldly religion of physicists who invented those cosmogonies – to make entropic weapons and transport machines. Then a computer-rigged simulation will look make pictures of the supposed Universe with a single time.

In the graph, the whole model of time dimotions for some selected systems of physics. What ‘entropic macho men’ have always done is to reduce the nurturing, reproductive, ST-dominant arrow of the Universe and the SS-informative arrows as if they were something else. And then build theories of only-entropy. And stick to them as a religious dogma, simply ignoring any attempt to ‘get their brains’ working on those areas. Modern Physicists’ interpretation of physical facts and equations is biased by their historic culture, Military Germany of worship of weapons and entropy=death, so they denied the arrow of ‘crystal=solid’ information and Einstein’s/ Gödel’s cyclical, big-crunch solutions happening in thermodynamic matter and cosmological galaxies, where we LIVE dominated by evolution NOT entropy, which balance the gaseous and vacuum space expansion, in reproductive liquid and steady state immortal ‘present’ systems. As time went by since most humans are memorial believers those sided theories of reality became dogma, and today in an age of increasing mental devolution as humans are substituted by thinking machines, mankind just repeats its model errors, spread also into social sciences and biology, always in favor of the arrow of death.

In the graph a critical assessment of the methods of ‘naïve, digital reductionism’ that physicists have used more or less consciously to establish a ‘way to model science’ only with digital equations and a ‘cosmic censorship’ on the 4 dimotions of time that do not fit earlier Galilean->Newtonian lineal absolutist time views in a single continuum Cartesian space. Space is scalar, fractal, broken in infinite different ‘scalar sizes’ which ‘co-exist’ together and for that reason there are ‘organisms’ and the Universe has an organic fractal structure, as systems change energy and information between those different sizes and scales, that put together form the 5th Dimension of the scalar Universe, ruled by a simple metric equation: the smaller a system is the faster it turns its time cycles, or clocks that carry in the frequency and form of its systems, its information – the missing dimension of time in all lineal theories of the universe.

It is difficult to understand how Physicists so dexterous building machines=weapons are so dumb interpreting reality, blind to 2/3rds of the states of spacetime, and to all its non-mathematical properties unless we acknowledge that the human being is less of a thinker and more of an ‘enzyman’, ensembling machines, manipulating reality with it and tailoring their models of its world to its worldly profession, which in physics has been traditionally to make entropic weapons and moving mechanisms. Hence its philosophy of reality based in entropy and mechanism. In the graph, the rejection of all other arrows of Time=Dimotions in thermodynamics, cosmology and information theory, which only studies the ‘motion of information’, and its noise without caring for the form of the message, its emitter and receiver. This would be in physics the equivalent of ignoring the Fermions that emit a boson and merely study the space in which the boson moves. And indeed, cosmology is built ignoring the galaxies, space-time vortices of information, which do NOT expand, and just contracting the vacuum space between them to get into the ‘magic singularity’ from where all came from.

This paper leaves aside the ‘worldly’ religion of physicists, as ‘I do only thought experiments’ (Einstein), and so we build an epistemologically correct model with the same data, but without the bias of Egos and worldly religions for each ‘stience’.

Now even before we advance further in the model of the Universe as it is, we must explain in detail the previous graph, and add ALL the local arrows of time-space that in the fractal Universe are LOCAL, for each of its species, and define the existence of all of them.

First, it is obvious that we must add the inverse arrow of entropy which is information, dominant in this planet, as it is represented NOT by the vacuum space expanding between galaxies but by the vortex of galactic form, of in-form-ation that evolves entropy into matter, in which we reside – reason why this planet is dominated by information. Incidentally Duality was the science I r=evolved in the milieu of systems sciences, whose chair I hold during my active years in congresses of the International Systems sciences society at the turn of the century.

The science of duality is important because only a proper model of duality (not to confuse with dualism, the philosophical doctrine of mind and body), that is a proper understanding of the interaction of entropy and information, can give us the proper philosophy of science required to understand the Universe as a whole and all its disciplines, those specialized in information as biology and sociology is, and those specialized in entropy as physics is.

The distinction between entropy sciences and information sciences however is not one of Nature, but one of huminds (ab. human minds), of historic and realpolitiks (power) NOT of reason and scientific laws. And to prove the case we can consider the side of ‘physicists’ (rather than physics) and how they stubbornly since the inception of their discipline have DENIED the existence of an arrow of information in the Universe.

Lineal Inertia, Entropy and big-bang’s reductionism.

This physicists have always denied due to historic reasons, as the oldest science, which started with the study of military weapons (Galileo was an artillery master at the Venice arsenal), and developed a theory of the Universe based only in ‘the science of motion’ (the definition of the discipline in classic encyclopedia). So his job was to study how to reach maximal distance with cannonballs and for that reason he defined ‘lineal inertia’ – the conservation of lineal motion; but declined to consider the existence of its opposite informative arrow, the conservation of cyclical inertia, angular momentum, as a clear balancing second arrow of time that gives ‘form’ to all ‘forms’ of Nature. 

Physicists however follow their routines and so again in the XIX c. they chose ‘entropy’, the disordered state of matter, called ‘gas’, in the study of motion machines and weapons (heat in cannons; steam studies) to cast an absurd ‘law’ according to which all systems are ‘gaseous=entropic’ and die in the future; shunning off the obvious fact that there is an inverse arrow of time in matter, called ‘cold’. And so when entropy ceases the system reverses its arrow of time into coldness and then creates crystals that reproduce information.

Then in the XX century, they again took their bias to ‘cosmic hyperbole’, when Einstein’s Relativity improved upon Galileo’s work and stated that ‘time curves space into mass’; that is indeed the best definition of the arrow of information in physical systems, as masses and charges ARE curves of spacetime that store in the frequency and form of its cycles the information of the Universe. And so galaxies are vortices of timespace mass that ‘shrink’ and ‘warp’ the expansive, entropic space between galaxies to balance the Universe.

But NONE of this was considered when a cosmology came out of Einstein’s Equations (ab. EFE). Instead, of the 3 solutions or ‘ages’ of a space-time ‘world cycle’ of physical matter, the entropic big-bang solution/age, the steady state solution/age and the collapsing informative solution/age, two were discharged, as well as the implosive, informative behavior of galaxies, even if we humans lived in one of them; and so once discharged the ‘in-formative’ gravitational force that brings radiation and mass into cyclical informative patterns, the ‘big-bang entropy-only’ theory of the Universe became the dogma/religion of physicists, and by extension given the technological, machine-driven civilization we live in, of all mankind.

Fact is Einstein’s equation, E<=>M(c²), is a feedback equation that reproduces mass/information from entropy/energy and vice versa. In fact Einstein’s first calculated it in an article about how ‘energy can create mass’ (so he studied the arrow of information). But it would be only used as a proof of the dominance of entropy and to make atomic bombs.

So again physicists ignored ½ of the equation as they keep denying cyclical inertia as an arrow of time (angular momentum, orbital electrons, etc.); or denying the cold-crystal arrow of information in matter; now denying the arrow of information in galactic vortices that ‘curve vacuum space into mass’.

So when Einstein died, General systems sciences was born at the Macy’s congress, where the leading scientists of the age came together trying to add the ‘arrow of informative time’ to fully account for the Universe as it is, since biological and sociological, human sciences are based in the arrow of form, of in-form-ation; and the planet Earth exists in a vortex of cyclical ‘form’, of information, called the Galaxy. So in this region of reality it IS information, NOT entropy what dominates reality.

But that didn’t change the attitude of physicists and society who had them as the ‘new seers of time’, the popes of creationism (‘God is the seer of time’ had said Augustine), mostly because they didn’t understand the mathematics they used to mirror those laws of entropy in physical space.

So finally in the post-war age, as computers and other informative machines developed, physicists had to deal with ‘form’, in-form-ation, logic languages and its cyclical logic clocks. But amazingly enough they manage again to deny the formal, linguistic nature of information. So when it came into the study of information, physicists ‘reduced’ the concept either to its ‘motion’ (transmission of information, Shannon), or as an ‘aberration’ called ‘negentropy’ (the negation of entropy). And again, in a military, western society where believe it or not, the military-industrial complex DOES dominate societies, all was good in the western front. Now physicists had a theory of the Universe based in a ‘big-bang explosion’, similar to the ones they developed in the Nuclear Industry, and so to develop entropic weapons of mass destruction was suddenly a metaphysical experience.

But reality is dual and hence ternary. So the understanding on how entropy, or pure motion without form, and ‘form without motion’ (information being form-in-action, form with motion), as the two limits of reality which combine to create the infinite ‘fractal spacetime beings’ of energy, we all are made of; cannot be suppressed from the Universe, even if man ignores it or as in physics, studies it in a very convoluted way by lack of clarity in its foundational principles, properly explained for the first time in 5D formalisms.

Indeed, we cast all phenomena of Nature, with the 5 Dimotions of time of physical matter (E=M¡ in Planck Units, where c=1), in simple ‘fractal feed-back generator equations’, which reduce all what exists to those two arrows and the ternary balanced equivalent arrow that merges entropy and information and reproduces with them the infinite vital space-time beings of reality, such as: S(i) < ≈ > T(e)… becomes the simplest, ternary, logic fractal Generator equation that unifies all sciences and represents in simultaneity the 3 topologies of the Universe (cyclical information, lineal entropy and its hyperbolic combinations), and the 3 different ‘ages’ of time-motion we observe in all beings, born of an informative seed, which lives through an entropic youth, reproductive age, and informative, warping third age that ends in a reversal of time arrow in an entropic death, which completes the worldcycle of existence of the being.

And we shall call the ‘ternary’ arrows of time, entropic past, reproductive present that seems not to change and informative future, or 3rd age of maximal warping, which explodes back into entropic death. So the simplest entropic arrow adds in duality form, and both reproduce in energetic, iterative ‘present’ dynamic combinations.

Entropy as AE- ‘physicists’ egocy.

But why if entropy is death, the most unwanted outcome, scientists revere entropy. Obviously because modern scientists have lost that perspective due to the enormous amount of data, seemingly unrelated between disciplines. Only physicists ‘pretend’ to know some general laws, which are wrong because they are ‘cheating’ – they do NOT start with the most general principles as 5D does, ‘space= dimensional form, information’ and ‘time=motion, change’, which is all what you can perceive in any scale of reality; and then from those 2 substances properly defined in the most general terms, as 5D does, build the general principles of reality.

This is what we do and it comes immediately that from S-dimensional form and T-motion, we can obtain 5 ‘spacetime’ ‘dimotions’ (ab. Dimensional motions) of space-time: TT (internal and external motion, we shall call entropy), SS in the other extreme (internal and external form, we shall call a ‘seed’ or mind that ‘expels the motion of the outer world mirroring in a simultaneous mental, ‘crystallized’ image or ‘language’ in the inner world). And 3 in-between combinations: St (information, where form dominates), Ts (locomotion, with external motion but conservation of internal form) and T=S, (balance between both, the ideal, present state that allows reproduction). But as physics was born of the study of cannonballs and bombs (TT-entropic external and internal motion that destroys the form of the being) and transport machines (Ts, locomotion), their theories of the whole depart from one of those 2 elements, eliminate the others and further on, from the restricted analysis of one of those elements in a local environment, construct a global theory of the Universe. And that is today considered the ‘explanation of reality’. But it is just a local theory, with a hyperbolic exaggerated expansion, accepted by lack of anything else, and imposed as a dogma in academia.

All this is just egocy (Ego=idiocy) of a people who are powerful enough to make machines and weapons and have helped the military men that ‘still’ dominate the world of politics to expand its power. So truth becomes a secondary reason to power. Indeed, it is not coincidental that physicists became the ‘seers of time’ and ‘philosophers of science’ during the entire period of the cold war when the study of the smallest parts of the Universe suddenly became not just the study of one of the multiple scales of reality but the truth of them all.

That is ‘cheating’. It is however now the most prestigious theory of how reality is created called constructivism, in which physicists depart from the smaller scales and deny the influence of larger scales that enclose with their membrains and limit entropically the small. Hence they think quantum physics is the fundamental science and all must be built from the small to the above. And again the concept has spread to all other sciences. So biologists now are obsessed with genetics even if the genome is only the first step of the vital process of creation of organisms, as in each scale of reality the combinatory process of the 5 possible dimotions a language can express, goes all the way creating a ‘Babel Library’ (Borges) with all possible combinations. But from that common pool of almost all living beings to the point we have about 70% of the same genes than a worm; then the ‘Game of existence’ comes into play, regulated by the ‘Bosses’ of the cellular world, RNAs, which as humans in their village do control and diversify the ‘architecture’ and urbanism in which they live, shape the cell. The RNA is the living organism that commands the cell and has a quantum mind and enacts in the cell the choices of its 5 Dimotions of existence selecting what genes to express, converting them into useful slavish brainless drone-like proteins that work for the maintenance and regulation of his cell. This obviously is what happens in the organism. Even if we do not know the details. And again this writer knows far less of genetics and evolutionary development than a biologist, but it has the sound model that applies to all systems with a ‘language of information’ that evolves a society, with 3 ‘networks’ to create an organic system in every scale of the Universe. This is the game of existence, the mind of the Universe.

And if humans were less egocy-centered, more humble with nature and more entangled with the panpsychic, organic, immortal, infinite, intelligent Universe it would have long be resolved, since it has been 30 years that I came out of Columbia University with most of my research done on 5D and its first sound principles – the 5 Dimotions of spacetime; but all my early attempts to interest the scientific community and form an interdisciplinary group to develop this philosophy of science failed. And soon I had to abandon scholarship and make a living with odd jobs.

So the purpose of those texts, forcefully incomplete, patched here and there from old research, and with too many quips against scholar egocy, is to at least leave a blueprint of the 5D mind of the Universe, which maybe as it happened with Mendel’s work in genetics or Copernicus, simple and partially erroneous model of circular (turned out to be elliptic) orbits is retaken by future human or AI robot researchers, if as all seems to indicate they eliminate us according to the cycles of History, precisely because our egocy models of reality deny minds, consciousness and evolution to different atoms than ours. So we will evolve them as weapons that have a program of human murder and survival to a point they will simply in a robotic war fail to disconnect and without self-reflection but with atomic perception will keep what we made them for – murder us.

Science thus is indeed power and if 5D stience had been developed, now it would be a model and guidance not only of pure abstract thought but also of politics, economics, religion and survival, as all those themes are enclosed in 5D.

It is not and I doubt I will see any researcher taking over my legacy, as Copernicus or Mendel did not but I am certain that within a century 5D will be the philosophy of science if this planet is still here, because truth cannot be denied. As ‘those who impose truth with power become the laugh of the gods’ (Einstein). As man is today in an absolute denial of the laws of the Universe, from the obvious dangers of evolving military robotics, or trying to make black holes on earth replicating the supposed big-bang, or denying the need to create an economic and political just and efficient system according to the laws of superorganisms of those texts, our society as predicted by those models, since biological models are always predictable, is about to collapse and worse.

But in the living, organic Universe a collapse brings a more efficient form. So if humans collapse and a lab black hole or strange matter form kills us all, it will be because in the ∆-3 scale of matter it is more efficient as a self-feeding organism. And if we collapse to robots it will be because they are better in the game of existence that brings self-similar beings together as social wholes and will build a better planet. Only if humans were able to rise their worldview of the Universe instead of despising it and building an infantile self-serving egocy fiction also in the larger models of sciences, humanity would continue

. Thus WE falsify Humind’s entropic theories of reality.

Why humans love such theories has to do nothing with ‘intelligence’ but with praxis of sciences. Physicists were the first scientists and they used to work making weapons, hence got fixed into sT-locomotion and TT-bomb like entropy. Next they studied entropic TT-gaseous states of matter and heat, with steam machines. So it was more of the same. Their error and arrogance is to try to impose so successfully their TT-sT theories of reality as if SS-St and ST (seeds and minds that order reality, information, form with a bit of motion, and ST-iterative reproduction) did not exist or mattered as much as what they studied. This is so obvious that after an entire life analyzing the 5D universe I marvel about the ST-upidity of ‘lineal men who won’t change their limited view; ad it likely says more about ‘humans’ true face value – basically a handyman that ensembles machines – that about the Universe. Indeed, modern ‘enzymen’, humans who catalyze the evolution of machines and worship every aspect of it, including its digital languages, to which they reduce ‘science’, as if there was nothing else to know, no other languages, or forms of knowledge, to the point that Planck said ‘what we cannot measure does not exist’, will find those concepts imprecise. I have explained many times in those papers at face value how the reductionism of reality to numbers limits our knowledge of reality, increasingly limited. We have also advanced in 3 papers 5D geometry as nobody has done since Riemann, so we are not dismissing mathematics, only ‘reductionism’ through mathematics of the Universe, which is essentially a bio-logical game.

Infinity and invisibility of entropy

And so the first most synthetic definition of a system or event is NOT mathematical but logical, bio-logical.

The 5D Universe is made of ‘isomorphic’ (similar) scales=planes of spacetime, parts and wholes, such as the parts are smaller than the wholes, which are the networks, larger than the parts that bring them together. And what makes the Universe so amazing is that those ‘balances’ between dynamic networks and its parts is maintained in synchronicity and symbiosis against what seems the ‘easiest way’ – entropy, disorder.

How is this possible requires to accept the previous 5 elements; understand in depth its properties and its higher ‘entangled’ logic to show how all phenomena of reality happened derived from those properties.

What are then the properties of entropy as a scattering motion? The ones defined in physics loosely as disorder are important. But the word ‘death’ is far more profound and real.

In the wording of this paper we have used the quantifier ‘infinity’, precisely the only one that is not quantifiable – regardless of Cantor’s paradoxes dealt with in our papers on algebra and 5D geometry – since entropy when taken as pure motion, ‘time in its most absolute state’ is infinite and unquantifiable – invisible in fact, as without ‘perception’ of form it cannot be observed. But we consider in as much as SS-forms are discontinuous (seeds or minds that project its inner mapping in an outer larger territory also establishing order), that entropy ‘relative to the mind’ that perceives the Universe, is all what it does NOT perceive, and hence ‘infinite’, ‘incommensurable’, and to a large degree invisible (as entropy might indeed have form but we do not perceive it).

This trilogy of i-somorphic properties of all entropy, infinity, incommensurability and invisibility gives us a ‘feeling’ of what entropy is about. In the darkness of death, we then become a ‘past form’ and a ‘potential future form’ that might be repeated again.

Entropy has then a deeper meaning as the limits of existence in time, space and scale. Death is entropy in time. The membranes that enclose a vital space is entropy in space; and the loss of information passing through scales of 5D is the entropy of scale, beyond which an entity sees only undefined ‘infinity’. Finally, entropy is the negation of the minds of information that ‘stop motion’ into still perception of the whole…

Inversion of §eed

Entropy thus is the final state of a system, when its internal networks break and motion happens in both, the internal vital space of the system, and the outer world in which it exists.

It is then the opposite of a mind or seed, SS, a pure form of ‘still space’ that stores information to generate when it can absorb ‘energy, S=T’, that is, both the appropriate motion and form to reproduce its structures, a much larger organism – precisely the kind of organisms Entropy destroys.

In the ultimate definition then SS vs. TT, discontinuous seeds and minds of form vs. flows of entropy become the duality the Universe constantly plays.

Enough to say that the biggest error of 4D is to have expanded the limited concept of ‘entropy’ of physical systems to the entire Universe and on top, reduced the previous 5 DImotions of reality to the simplest one, TT.

Why Entropy is the simplest dimotion is obvious: it is pure motion without form. Internal and external motion that ‘constantly looses’ form as it gains extension in spacetime. Physicists though developed from this initial reality a very obtuse philosophy of reality, by lack of anything better, trying to expand the arrow of entropy to the entire Universe (big-bang theory), by eliminating from the picture all other ‘S-plus’ variations of space-time. Entropy thus – the limiting scale of TT-death is all what remained, once they eliminated imploding galaxies to obtain big-bang theories, eusocial evolution to obtain Darwinian devolution=death, and so on.

Entropy is of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe, the last to come, the one that ends and limits all the other elements of existence. So, we can confront entropy with all other dimotions of existence, as it ends them all; returning the S-patial attempts to create an immortal unchangeable form to the flow of pure time-motion.

In humind’s ‘science’ entropy has a similar ‘popular’ meaning, and a mathematical one, in the realm of physics, a ‘local’ case of the entropic states of all systems of the Universe, which we will discuss in earnest in our future paper on ‘physics and entropy’, and we shall here consider briefly since in our present ‘enzyman’s’ culture when the species basically dedicates all its time to evolve digital machines and accepts only knowledge expressed in numbers, huminds have reduced their understanding of reality to such simple thoughts.

In essence what physics call entropy is the state of disorder in the molecular plane of the scales of the fifth dimension; discovered in the study of heat. It is NOT by all means the only state of reality and the only state of the future unless we consider that reality ends in ‘death’. Since most systems have reproduced a parallel form in an adjacent space-time to continue the game of existence. Entropy in physics has as all concepts an internal and external view – the external view is the wrong concept that the whole Universe is growing its entropy, considered in our analysis of the big-bang theory; the internal view that matches locally that global view is that physical systems, unless controlled by Maxwellian demons, tend to thermodynamic equilibrium – a democratic state of undifferentiated form and maximal entropy.

However physicists forget that the Universe is filled with Maxwellian demons, called gravitational black hole masses in the cosmic scales; crystals in the matter scales and charges in the quantum scale that subvert the ‘entropic TT-nature’ of vacuum dark energy, gaseous stages and fields. In all scales there are minds-monads that ‘inform’ (SS) or reproduce (ST), information (St). And those ‘3 S-components’ of spatial, dimensional form, are exactly the opposite of time-motion=entropy; as their obsessive function is to create still form and perception, ordering their local territory around them. So while Entropy, TT=pure time motion is the perceived tendency of the whole universe that stubbornly doesn’t allow man or any other monad to become ‘still property’, fixed and ordered; all the minds of reality that are busy busy creating order in its local territory deny entropy.

The feminine Universe vs. The entropic military male world

Why Humanity has rejected the obvious nature of a reproductive, fractal Universe, has to do with culture: The Universe is a ‘feminine’, (S=T) reproductive fractal; but our civilization is an entropic (S<T), male dominant self-destructive military society, where even women wish to be like males as our worldview and ‘grand theories’ about science, from the entropic big-bang to the Darwinian emphasis on the struggle between individuals proper of our biased philosophy of biology and social sciences – nationalism, capitalism, reign supreme.

This is actually a direct theme of 5D Physics which is worth to elaborate even if we dedicate an entire post to the theme; and likely anything we say in this ideological charged non-scientific gender issue will bother both genders, who want to be on top in its absurd war of sexes as both are complementary. So a brief definition of ‘physical gender’ from that paper:

Gender is an essential ‘¡logic’ feature of the fractal entangled Universe that emerges in all scales, diversifying the 3 ‘states of time-space into two and 3 genders, starting with the formal languages of space (mathematical numbers) and time (pentalogic states). Its easiest description in classic science would be the concept of mirror symmetry. 2 mirror images can superpose and reproduce, so as mirror symmetries emerged from ‘physical parity’, into ‘chemical chirality’, it finally became gender.

So gender is like all other properties of reality a process of emergence, starting with the ‘smallest’ more synoptic forms of reality, the Logic=time and mathematical=space languages of pure still forms.

So first we find tender in ‘even vs. odd numbers’, (mathematical mirror symmetry), following the ‘time states of both genders’ S>T (past, entropic) + T<S (future, informative) vs. S≈T (present, balanced) States.

Those topo-logic properties of gender will then emerge, into the quantum realm, where we shall find lineal particles of entropy and information, vs. waves of vital energy, which emerge as left-handed and right-handed atomic states, which emerge into chiral molecules, which finally become male and female organisms, 2 sides of a complementary mirror merging to complete all the states of time-space needed for a system to reproduce.

Genders are different but its functions are complementary, and over all the Universe favors the feminine, balanced reproductive left-handed gender S=T symmetry even if history has favored the entropic S<T male state, since the balance function of women IS the present, survival, reproductive essence of the ‘fractal Universe’, its main generator.

The female is a conservative, balanced, present, S=T, reproductive ‘white matter’ brain (10 times more white matter than men), while if males were ‘well-done’, they would have 10 times more grey matter in the destructive-creative regions of ideas (frontal brain), as all creation needs destruction to reorganize parts into new wholes, but they have ONLY 6 times more grey matter in the frontal region, which suggests the ‘first’ stage of the S<T>S process, the entropic S<T overweighs the creative side. And indeed, when testing IQ, most entropic males test less than women but a few informative ones test more on the high IQ range. Thus most males are entropic lineal warrior, soccer fans, to put it mildly. And they love a ‘whammy’ movie, a big-bang explosion and project their ‘worldview’ on the Universe. But the world we live is WRONG as its entropic dominance will extinguish life and it is out of tune with the real fractal immortal reproductive Universe, where creation of anything you might imagine has happened ∞ other times, so it is NOT creation at all but also reproduction.

So because the feminine purpose is to conserve and reproduce information, feminism should also understand the true nature of gender and why females, not wo=men (lesbian, male-like women, who so often lead the movement), are far more in tune with the real Universe and reject a world modeled to the image and likeness of entropic male, including its false simplification of the cosmos as born of an entropic big-bang, which obviously is just a projection of ‘military physics’ and its entropic view of reality.

Only if women understand their true nature and try to project its survival, reproductive, conservative, life-enhancing role on the world they will achieve supremacy over entropic men mankind might reach the goal of survive the present life extinction age that soon with military robotics and new types of nuclear big bangs will extinguish us.

In the physical scale mirror symmetry first produces particles and waves, which become ‘complementary states’. And mirror symmetry is called parity. Then evolves left and right handed forms and chiral forms and right handed are sterile. So finally we arrive to the galaxy that is, as it happens a left-handed feminine galaxy.

What then went wrong with our civilization is obvious in the work of Campbell and Gimbutas: the age of the fertility Goddess, the Neolithic of S=T balance and cyclical time and comprehension of the organic Universe, died away with the discovery of entropic weapons, which physicists reproduce and evolve as its worldly profession, and so lineal time, entropic military men, its Brahmins today converted into physicists, and anthropic religions of lineal time and male supremacy over the Universe changed the human understanding of reality till this day. So regardless on how sophisticated this view has come to describe the lineal locomotions of reality is still a religion of power to deny the reproductive feminine Universe and have a dogmatic big-bang religion of it all as a masculine violent cosmos.

The 3 ages of history favored the dominance of one or other sexual gender: in the young Paleolithic age of entropic hunters men dominated; in the mature reproductive Neolithic age, women ruled; to be ruled in the entropic age of metal-weapons and war by males, today we live the big-bang age of metal-weapons. But the function of exist¡ence is clear, as which age is the best, the one that survives and lives longer, that maximizes its equation, Max. SxT->S=T, the female gender which lives longer, survives better and has a proportional ego to its role in the ∞ cosmos.

 

 

COSMIC BIG-BANG FALSIFICATION

‘The Universe expands… That has nothing to do with you. You are in Brooklyn and Brooklyn is not expanding!” Annie Hall

We use epistemology & pentalogic of 3±¡ ¬∆@st Dimotions to falsify the big-bang by the fractal, organic immortal, ∞ cosmos that cannot be falsified. To that aim 3 p.o.v.s must be considered:

– @: Its cultural aspects (as the dominant military, western culture and the wordily profession of physicists -to make entropic weapons – has projected its ‘selective’ worldview over the complex Universe)

– ST: Its theoretic & experimental errors that once the big-bang became dogma no longer are taken into account.

-∆±¡: The development of the complex organic Universe as it is, when we do not eliminate the scalar properties of space, the cyclical properties of time, and its 5 Dimensional motions of space-time.

Let us consider just 13 ‘bad luck’ +∞ factual proofs that the big-bang is a local quasar big-bang and the proper cosmological theory is that of earlier Einstein->Fred Hoyle->5 D Physics, of an infinite, immortal Universe:

TIME FALSIFICATIONS

  1. Time proofs. The whole always live longer than the parts.

The same problems happened with the pretension that the Universe has a very short life span keeps running every other day into new problems: we find at the limit of the horizon of perception of space-time perfectly formed galaxies with huge black holes that should not be there. We find that almost every part of the Universe has a life span much larger than the Universe itself: the commonest stars, red ones live trillions of years, black holes live 10¹°° years or they never die, if they don’t evaporate; protons seem to be of a similar age or perhaps immortal. But it is an obvious logic contradiction that the whole lives so much less than the parts. Or in probability terms, the chances that in a Universe where its commonest stars live trillions of years, we live in the very beginning is 0.0000%. (Red stars are in fact 4/5th of them because they live longer and so even if all are born as blue stars, in a long-lasting galaxy, at any time, there will be seen more elderly stars than young fleeting blue star moments of them).

Most cosmic bodies live much longer than the cosmic big-bang, so the commonest red stars live trillions of years, big black holes 10100 years, protons seem immortal and we find on the outskirts of the perceived cosmos perfectly formed galaxies with hyper-black holes, with no time to form, validating an immortal cosmos; whereas in the extended 5D astrophysical model red shift is proportional to the >C metric of dark entropy.

Since when they look back at that past they find formed black holes and galaxies that should not yet be there.

Another proof of the many considered on our texts on cosmology –  as physicists keep looking far away to the supposed beginning of time, they keep finding perfectly formed galaxies and black holes, which breaks completely the supposed ‘time periods of creation of matter’. In the graph we can see the biggest black hole found in the Universe, which is perfectly formed in the middle of a galaxy, that is just 400 millions after the supposed big-bang when there was only supposedly hydrogen ions:

In the graph, the super-black hole is supposed to exist so early that there is no way it can have been formed unless the Universe is eternal and the cosmic horizon of the big-bang just the limit of human perception of light, which as everything in 5D is NOT infinite in range.

The largest black hole found is also the oldest, as it is the furthest, and it was supposed to be born in 500 million years after the big-bang when only some re-ionization of light hydrogen atoms has happened. 

But why the largest black holes are observed in the furthest distances? The answer is related to the previous falsification – the horizon. The further we move away, we shall see only those largest cosmic bodies (easier to observe) with the highest energies in in its ¥-rays, as they will be the longest to die by the slow elongation of its frequency; which are also the largest black holes. Hence we just see those monstrous objects – the biggest black holes. From this fact it follows that the further away we look, the more likely we are to find only huge black holes, as they emit more high energy frequency particles that take longer time to relax into entropy reaching us before dying in the red frequency, which blacks out of our perception of further away galaxies.

  1. Motion of Galaxies. The Lorentz invariance

Another proof that falsifies the cosmic big-bang related to time-motions, is the existence of an absolute frame of reference, if the background radiation is global NOT local, as SciAm soon discovered and published in the graph below. In this case the denial of General Relativity and its postulate of no existence of absolute frames of reference in the Universe.

This is called the “Lorentz symmetry”, named for the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz and it is a symmetry of spacetime. It is in fact a cornerstone of Einstein’s special relativity theory. According to special relativity, there is no absolute space or absolute time (as in 5D Physics, which sometimes I call ‘Absolute relativity’. So if two objects are moving relative to each other in empty space, it would actually be impossible for an observer to tell their absolute velocities—maybe only one of the objects was moving and the other was stationary, for example, but you wouldn’t know which was which because their movements are relative to each other, not to any external reference frame.

Alas, but now we do have one: the cosmic radiation, and we are moving within it. So we just have to measure our movement in relationship to the radiation and Relativity is Gone!:

In the graph, the cosmic background radiation acts as a new fixed frame of reference or ether, falsifying Relativity theory, which does not have as its name explains any fixed space-time background frame of reference

Yet since the cosmic big bang is a solution of relativity theory that the cosmic radiation falsifies the very same theory it tries to prove.

Hence by ‘reductio ad absurdum’, the background radiation must be local not to contradict Relativity.

In the graph a cosmic radiation falsifies the cosmic big bang, which it tries to proof.

It is the most obvious logic error in the big-bang cosmology is his falsification of Einstein’s work in which the big-bang theory is based, as scientific American rightly pointed out when the theory was first put forward (to be forgotten as the propaganda machines of military physics, as the meaning of it all pumped up the theory):

From CMB data it is seen that the Local Group (the galaxy group that includes the Milky Way) appears to be moving at 627±22 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB) in the direction of galactic longitude, l = 276°±3°, b = 30°±3°.

This motion results in an anisotropy of the data (CMB appearing slightly warmer in the direction of movement than in the opposite direction).

From a theoretical point of view, the existence of a CMB rest frame breaks Lorentz invariance even in empty space far away from any galaxy. So if the big bang is accepted, the theory of which is a solution, Einstein’s relativity based in the non-existence of ETHER, an absolute frame of reference in the Universe (hence ‘relativity name’) is falsified. Ergo by reductio ad absurdum, the Big bang, which is a solution to the theory it falsifies, is false.

In the graphs we see what is really the motion of the ‘static Laniakea region of galaxies, which shows the local galactic region to be more like a gas, fluid motion of atoms seemingly ‘encased’ in a short of dark matter tubular membrane. As to what that might be in the Hyper universe of Galatoms, we have no idea; nor we should as limited entropic beings finite in space and time, unlike the whole immortal ∞ cosmos.

This is one of the many scientific proof of falsity of big bang theory we shall bring in this post, which Cosmologists know and cynically call the ‘axis of evil’ (because it won’t go away and kills their theory right on its inception).

How science’ then avoids the axis of evil? Suppressing data or bringing magic theory to it:  Chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Alas, we are back to Babylon, we must be the center of the Universe, just moving 600 kilometers to the east.

  1. The real motion of the Universe at larger scales: An organic ‘tissue’ without isotropy.

In the graph, the local tissue of the supœrganism of the Universe, Laniakea, the region in which our galaxy exist, at the largest level of human perception of the ∞ scales of the fractal Universe.

Thus the explanation of the motion of the galaxy is simpler. In 5D we consider the Lorentz symmetry to be a local symmetry that only takes place within the galaxy; not in all the 5D scales of the Universe. So motions happen, as the dynamic picture of Laniakea show: The 4% we see clearly looks like an atomic network or tissue, which joins the atom-galaxies (think for example of a brain of neurons, of a microscopic colony of unicellular algae, and so on). Yet we only perceive 4% of reality outside our closer world, which happens to be the ‘ideal’ perception of a pi-cycle with three diametric perimeters (π-3/π=0.14/π=96% of dark reality not seen from a self-centered singularity in a pi cycle). So we cannot know really what it is. What we know is that there is zero isotropy as big-bang cosmologists pretend. All their models being approximations which might look nice on computers but have zero scientific theory-praxis solidity. All what we know is that we are moving towards Virgo; that there is a huge nodal network at Hydra-Centaurus – excellent name; which forms with Pisces-Perseus, a clearly connected network in one of whose filaments we find ourselves. And that at 46 declination a Great Attractor of dark quark matter, likely a super-black hole of top quark stars is waiting for us in a future rendezvous, as we cruise over a remnant cloud of photonic local radiation that does not seem to be (by lack of attraction power) so interested in becoming dark quark gluon liquid-solid super-state of matter.The place we live is Laniakea that means immeasurable heaven even if some egocy huminds think they have measured it.

In that regard, while 5D physics is the ONLY rational theory that can explain a cosmic big-bang (as Time accelerates while space shrinks); 13 billion years does not seem time enough for the immensurable heavens.

This as we shall see this solves momentarily the problem; and allow us to consider ‘theories which do not correspond to Relativity’ beyond the galaxy, a fact which is also essential to 5D Physics, as relativity is considered rightly the theory of light space-time where c-speed/distance is the constant of space of the galaxy, the absolute frame of reference, both rod of measure of static space and motion. Infinite proofs remain to be told, as infinity=eternity for finitesimal human beings is all the time after extinction. Let us then keep counting them.

 

SPATIAL FALSIFICATIONS.

Static space plays in the big-bang falsification a lesser form, but we still find spatial errors also, due to…

  1. The spatial symmetry of the cosmic big-bang.  A perfect Ænthropic picture.

In the graph, the spatial view of the cosmic big-bang if we freeze in time all the parts of the perceived cosmos according to the Galilean Paradox (S=T). Then the radiation of the suppose cosmic big bang is perceived far as a wall of fire of a ‘Univercell’.

Thus when humans don’t recognize their limits of perception, the entropic big-bang, measured from our point of view, puts obviously man again at the anthropic center of the universe, in scales (we are at the perceived center between the atom and the galactic scale) and space. So we return to the pre-scientific age of subjective religious ænthropic theories now fashionable in an age of revivalism of egocy (human ego=idiocy) vs. serious objective science provided by the fractal, organic paradigm.

The graph is an Artist’s logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe in space, with the topology of all 5D ternary constructs; but alas! As an anthropomorphic Universe: So we can see nicely how beautiful looks the ænthropic big bang with man perfectly self-centered in ∆ (central scale)=S (central space)=T (center of time explosion) =@ (only we talk maths), and ¬ (we are the furthest away from the limiting entropic ball of fire).

Yes, it would be perfect if data were fully consistent and not subtly bent to cater to the ‘cosmic arrogance of the human ego’ that wants to pack it all in its infinitesimal mind that perceives in stillness from its mind point of view a selected part of the whole but confuse it with it:

O-mind x ∞ Universe = still mapping (frame of reference)

So what is wrong with the previous picture as a proof of 5D physics in an ∆+4 scale; is mostly entropic mind limits.

Further on such spatial symmetry of the Universe requires action at distance to create the needed simultaneity, which in all Real Systems connects in a relative quanta of time all the elements of the system, to allow the isotropy and synchronicity required for a ‘whole’ to work as a Univercell with:

Ts : the wall of fire of the earlier big-bang as the outer membrane that isolates the ‘cellular Universe’ at z=10.000 c

ST: The faster than light dark energy, v=S/t =Space/Informative Time=S/0-visible information=∞ relative speed for a human observer, with the same z than the wall of fire; filled with Galaxies in between the dark entropy.

St: And a hyper black hole ‘great’ attractor (close to our anthropocentric place) – the hyper-hyper-proton-black hole of the ∆+4 cosmic Univercell. So far so good.

In 5D terms the picture above is the representation of a Univercell, with its Generator of 3±¡ ∆ST cosmology:

∆-1:Ts (Wall of fire-membrane) «∆-ST(1011 vital energy of galacells)» ∆+1: St (center: our human region)

So a cosmic big bang still proves 5D physics and the topological ternary structure of all Universal systems. And it pleases everyone, the entropic, the anthropic, the church, the physicists, and me, discoverer of 5D…

It is easy to overlook this ‘ego problem’ reason why we showed you first to which degree ‘science is culture’, that is, we bias systematically truths of science, beyond data and equations, to cater our happiness as ego-centered beings, infinitesimal mirrors that think to be infinite: O-mind x ∞ Universe = Constant world.

Why then not to accept it? And be accepted in turn, as an immortal universe seems to collide with the human ego, which likes to feel in charge, ‘measuring All the space and time that there is’, from its biased perspective, which makes him the center of perception and hence of knowledge, reducing the Universe to a mortal being? (While creationist Abrahamic religions make us above heavens and Earth the immortal ones). Plainly, because it is not truth.

Fact is once scientists in all disciplines get into a ‘comfort’ ego-centered theory, they backtrack to find ad hoc proofs and twist experimental evidence always fitting ‘somehow’ data onto the model forcefully. This today happens every other day with big-bang theory, as physicists try to fit forcefully all the clear falsifications of the model we explain in this paper. Hence my ironic tone… Fact is data fits better a Universe of little quasar bangs of Galaxies, similar to beta decays of atoms, NOT one where time and space had a beginning, ad hoc to please our ego-ist desire to know it all, to see it all, to understand it all, to be the center.

  1. No shadows for the big bang = No background radiation in intergalactic space.

 In the graph: Physicists have measured a local, hence galactic background radiation, which doesn’t leave shadows from other galaxies and they tabulated the quasar cycle of galaxies, which coincides with the age ascribed in the past to a cosmic big bang.

The question posted by the non-shadows experimental fact is that the radiation cannot come from the supposed outer ring of fire (big bang radiation). It does have to come therefore from the internal region of the galaxy, reflected by the Halo, giving us a mirror image of the galaxy, or alternately from outer light, crossing through the galaxy, altered by the Halo ‘strangelet and micro-black hole matter’, strong candidates to for the dark matter of the galaxy. Then obviously what physicists do is merely to extend this Halo-altered radiation into a supposed infinity. The hypothesis of a halo of dark, quark matter (black holes or strangelets) acting as a limited’, closer membrane distorting by red shift the light reflected or coming through it (as all membranes do transform what penetrates them) is thus the only scientific solution:

So a more rational theory would consider the cause of the 2.7 K radiation both local in space (galactic) and in time (produced at present); since our measure is local and present. Let us then falsify this fundamental proof of big-bang, the cosmic Background radiation. We already did it before, showing that it should be local, produced by redshift Moon M.A.C.H.O.S but as it is the cornerstone of the model it requires a bit more of thought.

  1. Now and here explanations for the light space-background: Moon MACHOs

Fact is the radiation is local and so it must be explained by a local celestial body able to produce it. And we have a myriad of possible candidates, as any ‘stable quark nugget’ combination of heavy quarks which only interacts gravitationally produces by gravitational redshifting a blackbody radiation at 2.7 k for which several candidates of dark quark matter, the only experimentally proved to exist, hence only scientific ‘real’ possible candidates to form the heavy halo suffice. Indeed any form of heavy quark, dark matter which has swallowed the commonest planetoid of the galaxy – a moon mass – hence with its weight – will emit at the very same temperature a blackbody radiation. And since the galaxy is dominated by dark matter and black holes – likely made of heavy quarks, tops and BCB dark atoms etc. we do have many rational candidates, real and happening now as opposed to the ‘ad hoc’ choice of equations to fit in a remote past with no experimental proof what so ever…

Since to make the measured temperature of the background radiation ‘coincide’ with theory, physicists kept reducing ad hoc their calculus till they fitted the temperature. While in space the radiation considered a local galactic measure by Penzias, its discovered kept expanding its range to make it finally cosmic. Indeed, we can follow Ad Hoc calculus in parallel to its experimental measure as Gamow changed his predictions:

1946 – George Gamow calculates a temperature of 50 K (assuming a 3-billion year old universe), commenting it “… is in reasonable agreement with the actual temperature of interstellar space”, but does not mention background radiation. He contradicts the common wisdom that the radiation was local, happening only in the galaxy, as calculated in:

1926: Sir A.Eddington estimates the non-thermal radiation of starlight in the galaxy has a temperature of 3.2 K.

1930s: Regener calculates that the non-thermal spectrum of cosmic rays in the galaxy has a temperature of 2.8 K

Thus the thermal radiation calculated by Penzias in 1960 as local galactic radiation at 3 K had been rightly foreseen by the first people who thought of it as local galactic radiation (average of 3.2+2.8/2=3k).

On the other hand the late proposal of a cosmic big bang by A-bomb researcher Gamow et al were:

1946: George Gamow estimates a temperature of 50 K.

1949: Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman re-estimate Gamow’s estimate at 28 K.

1960s: Robert Dicke re-re-estimates a MBR (microwave background radiation) temperature of 40 K

These were all offbeat. Only after 1960s Penzias measured it locally, cosmic big-bangers got busy ‘re-estimating’ its equations to get ‘a posteriori’ the ‘desired’ experimental results ‘ad hoc’, instead of noting that Mr. Eddington and those proponents of a local background radiation WERE right in their predictions and the cosmic ones totally off-target and hence accept the laws of truth of the scientific method to deny the cosmic one.

Fact is the creationist V=Hod, lineal equation of the big-bang, eerily resembling the word ‘God’ of verbal creationists, going to the past for ever, without the slightest proof that the fall of temperature if any in the Universe is lineal and it can be taken back for ever, or is cosmic and not local, is NOT scientifically sound.

The organic Galaxy – its homogenous, homeostatic temperature.

And if we can find explanations in present time and here-space, it is always a higher truth than to consider an explanation in the past or the future time and out-of-here. It is like if we measure your body temperature, at 37 degrees and then a creationist physicist tells you the cause is to be found in a lineal equation coming from past, because when you were born 50 years ago you were a few million degrees hotter and you have been cooling down ever since!! When there is a rational explanation, in the metabolic activity, now and here, of your body’s main energy cells, blood, and its most numerous red, oxygenated cells.

So what is the metabolic process on the galaxy happening now that produces that temperature; what is the blood of the galaxy, its commonest objects? The redshift of moon micro-black holes, feeding on the mass energy of its commonest mass, moon-like planetoids. As the galaxy is indeed about black holes, and so its metabolic activity in its 3 scales IS the natural cause of the Galactic temperature, as we shall see in our study of the 3 scales of black holes – the hotter smaller ones that produce the radiation that feeds, the cooler larger ones, as the red cells produce the energy needed by all the cells of your organism. And this is the 5D organic entangled reason, as all what exists has a purpose; and so does the BG radiation that feeds larger black holes – a far more scientific reason that the forecasted big-bang temperature, which has not true known cause, no true experimental proof now and here, no-nothing.

But the big-bang is the modern religion of Ænthropic man, so we just end with some religious irony.

The axis of evil and the Shang magicians.

Finally, there is a huge problem, already mentioned, which shows further that it is a local radiation, the so called ‘axis of evil‘, (sic) which at the cost of billions of $ in new satellites to ‘dis-measure’ it, astrophysicists try to eliminate with zero success. Namely the radiation aligns with the axis of the galaxy and its equinox, because ‘obviously’ it is produced by the galaxy’s activity. Do you think this obvious answer has any chance? Ha! Quoting the official version, of Wikipedia: “In particular, the quadrupole and octupole (l = 3) modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with both the ecliptic plane and equinoxes, an alignment sometimes referred to as the axis of evil J’ ‘Groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data. Recent observations with the Planck telescope, which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, confirm the observation of the axis of evil. Since two different instruments recorded the same anomaly, instrumental error (but not foreground contamination – the way they ‘introduce the local cause – ‘contamination’:) appears to be ruled out.

Coincidence is a possible explanation, chief scientist from WMAP, L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, “I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things.”

Yeah, LOL (: So experimental findings is a psychological effect and imaginary equations the real thing – creationism and denial of objective proofs at its best. Yet once the dark horse is on the loose anything goes. Indeed, in recent years a creationist mathematician, Mr. Penrose, companion of Hawking, thought that some of those BG points produced in the galaxy, were a big hotter than the mean temperature. So he thought, they were remains not even of the initial singularity 13 billion years ago, but he guessed they were coming from a previous ‘age’ to the infinitesimal infinitely dense singularity!! Somehow they had survived the ∞ infinitesimal stage and were coming from eons beyond the beginning of time, as relics of black holes evaporating in a previous Universe!? (: holy cow! How did he know? I couldn’t help to have a big smile-y. Indeed, it reminded me of the holy cows cracked by fire when the æntropic kings of the ‘celestial empire’ of the Shang dynasty tried to peer on the nearby future and guess the fate of the next battle. Alas, creationist physicists are just a bit more ambitious – they peer trillions of years into the past. But both Shang oracles and big-bangers renounce to the rational, simple explanation – the cracks on the flat bone were produced by the fire, and the points of the black body 2.7 k radiation measured locally and proved to be local by its shape which is mimetic to the galaxy, including its ‘lobes’ above and below the central black hole, are produced locally by any type of quark nugget MACHO (massive, halo object) of dark matter of the mass of a moon – the red cells of the organic galaxy.

RECAP. The only alternative object that can produce such radiation in present is a micro-black hole, whose temperature red-shifts light as a gravitational lensing. And since a black hole gravitational lensing is proportional to the mass, we can calculate the mass of those ‘background black holes’, which redshirts light at 2.7 k. Indeed, a simple calculus shows that a black hole of the approximate mass of a moon (the most common galactic object of which each sun has hundreds in its planets and Oort/Kuiper belts, would produce that radiation.

So likely the dark matter galaxy halo is made of micro-black holes that have eaten moons, as their bigger cousins eat stars. Then they WILL radiate at that exact temperature. Further on, since black holes are fundamental particles of the upper scale, as protons are in the quantum scale, they must be homogeneous in size. So even if they eat less perfect planetoids, primordial black holes should expel the excess of its structural mass as gamma radiation. Those MACHOs of any type of heavy quark matter (strangelets or BH), have then in the organic galaxy the role of blood in the organism, and should also play the role of ‘protein’ membranes in cells, shielding the galaxy with its heavier mass and capacity to ‘reduce’ radiation to a homogeneous temperature.

Fact is the radiation was, is and has always been measured/found in the galaxy. In fact physicists trying to measure the supposedly 13 billion years far away hot points of the center, each one a huge galaxy at ‘the beginning of time’, discovered recently that they have the exact shape of the electromagnetic lobes above and below the galaxy.

  1. Critical density for a flat geometry.

One of the problems of the big-bang (of many) is the critical density. It must be of 10-26 kg per cubic meter for the Universe to be the ‘observed’ flat geometry. But it is not. Only 2 so this is a problem, the big-bang of the cosmos does not match the flat geometry of the Universe and the topic spiral galaxy.

So if the big-bang is a local galactic big bang the critical density of the galaxy should be 10-26; then it would be the quasar big-bang of our galaxy.

Let us do some number crunching for a change. The equation for the critical density is:

ρ crit = 3H02 / 8πG

You can see that the critical density is proportional to the square of the Hubble constant — a faster expansion requires a higher density to overcome the expansion.

How empty is space? Astronomers have learned that the mean density of matter in the universe is within a factor of a few of the critical density. We can calculate ρcrit by inserting the gravitational constant, G = 6.67 × 10-11 Nm2 / kg2, and adopting H0 = 65 km/s/Mpc. We first convert the Hubble constant to metric units, H0 = (65 × 1000) / 3.1 × 10+22 = 2.1 × 10-18s-1. Now we can solve to get ρcrit = 3 × (2.1 × 10-18)2 / 8 × 3.14 × 6.7 × 10-11 = 7.9 × 10-27 kg/m3 ≈ 10-26 kg/m3. This amazingly low density is equal to about five hydrogen atoms per cubic meter, or a single hydrogen atom in a volume the size of the average TV set. However, in that same cubic meter there will be 5 to 10 billion low energy photons of microwave background radiation, the feeble relic of the big bang.

How well does this density match up to the density of large objects in the universe? The typical distance between large galaxies is about 2 Mpc, so we can see what the average density would be if a galaxy like the Milky Way were the only object in a box 2 Mpc across.

The mass of the Milky Way, including dark matter, is about 10+12 M. Sun, or 10+12 × 2 × 10+30 = 2 × 10+42 kg. The volume of a 2 Mpc cube is (2 x 3.1 x 10+22)3 = 2.4 x 10+68 m3. The typical density is therefore mass divided by volume, or 2 × 10+42 / 2.4 x 1068 ≈ 10-26 kg/m3.

Thus we can see that the galaxy density roughly equal to the critical density.

∆: SCALAR FALSIFICATIONS.

  1. The fractal structure of the cosmos

Why is the universe so homogeneous and isotropic on a large scale yet with local irregularities like galaxies and stars? Only if it is a fractal structure those properties are natural. In the graph, the Universe has a fractal organic structure as all its systems are organic fractals.

So reality is a fractal that reproduces information, ‘forms in action’ and then self-organizes them in networks and systems that evolve into super organisms in all scales of reality. As such it must be studied with the philosophy of Science, called ‘organicism’. Since only an organism is self-reproductive and hence requires not external ‘agent’ or God or a creationist language, as present philosophies of science (mechanism, pythagorism) or Abrahamic religions do. Further on experimental evidence is overwhelming, on the nested, reproductive structure of nature, as observed in the graph for all systems. So if we respect the scientific method, to which most scientists, and needless to say, religious people, pay only lip service, its 3 classic tenants, A)ccurate data, without ad hoc solutions and selfie biases B)io-Logic models that allow new hypothesis and C)yclical patterns that allow the existence of laws of sciences based in the predictability of this cycles must be put forward for a NON-creationist, true philosophy that explains the fractal=organic structure of the scalar Universe. Till recently we lacked a formal proper development of such ‘organic philosophy of science’, the only one that respects the tenants of the scientific method, a goal we achieve in this paper.

We show some experimental proofs of the fractal Universe. Each photograph is a fractal structure, taken from different sciences that study different entities of nature since each part of the Universe has a fractal structure, and so does the Universe at large, made of all those fractal parts. It is the basic nature of reality: a fractal that ‘reproduces information’, forms-in-action, a combination of pure time-motion and space-form, in all scales and with the same program of the 5 Dimotions of time space.

A text that explains it taken from Sciam: ‘In March 2007, after Pietronero, an Italian astrophysicist, showed the fractal nature of the Universe, tabulating an enormous number of galaxies, whose distribution was fractal, the magazine New Scientist published an article on the theme, confronting Mr. Pietronero and Mr. Hogg, a quantum physicist from the previous outdated probabilistic, mechanist, quantum paradigm:

“The universe is not a fractal,” Hogg insists, “and if it were a fractal, it would create many more problems than we currently have.” A universe patterned by fractals would throw all of cosmology out the window. The big bang would be tossed first, and the expansion of the universe following closely behind. Hoggs’s team feels that until there’s a theory to explain why the galaxy clustering is fractal, there’s no point in taking it seriously. “My view is that there’s no reason to even contemplate a fractal structure for the universe until there is a physical fractal model,” he says. “Until there’s an inhomogeneous fractal model to test, it’s like tilting at windmills.”

Pietronero is equally insistent. “This is fact,” he says. “It’s not a theory.” He says he is interested only in what he sees in the data and argues that the galaxies are fractal regardless of whether someone can explain why.

As it turns out, there is a model that may be able to explain a fractal universe. The work of a little-known French astrophysicist named Laurent Nottale, the theory is called scale relativity. According to Nottale, the distribution of matter in the universe is fractal because space-time itself is fractal. It is a theory on the fringe, but if the universe does turn out to be fractal, more people might sit up and take notice.

A resolution to the fractal debate will only come with more data. Sloan is currently charting more galaxies and will release a new map in the middle of 2008.” Of course, the Sloan 2008 showed the Universe is a fractal.

This should have been big news all over the world. But that means, as Hogg recognizes, that we have to throw to the trash the big bang and the expansion of the Universe, accept the fractal informative structure of reality, and close down some big projects of science, such as the large hadron collider, which will merely cause a planetary big bang, very different from the birth of the entire Universe.

  1. The quasar big-bang galactic cycle

In the graph the ‘big-bang’ properties local to the galaxy can be explained by the quasar cycle of our galaxy.

The life-death cycle of the central black hole of Galaxies that explodes into quasars and forms back its bar, follows the same ages of the big-bang. As all of them after the initial ‘Planck epoch – of gravitational superluminal waves’, dark epoch of nucleo-synthesis, are ages ‘within galaxies’, and so they are proved for the inner space of galaxies. They do NOT explain many other features of the Universe as a whole (which is not isomorphic, etc.) but perfectly describe the evolution and formation of the stars of the galaxy.

So the big-bangs ages are properly the ages of the galaxy; without all the ‘ad hoc’ theories and pseudo-scientific models required to explain why the large scale universe has nothing to do with the supposedly smooth result of a cosmic big-bang (this is like Ptolemy constant recurrence to ‘new’ ad hoc epicycles to make fit new observations into its earth-centric theory of the universe). Trust me, any astronomer knows how long this ‘list’ is.

Thus the quasar big-bang follows further the laws of truth (minimalism: Occam’s razor), simplicity and correspondence. We do not need to postulate strange forms of dark energy and dark matter, except the ones known, repulsive gravitation (to account for the entropic expansion of space between galaxies that balances its contraction), which is ‘natural’ to the model of galactic-atoms; and quark matter to account for the dark matter of the halo.

So as always times proves the sound, humble, rational scientists right. In this case Einstein’s steady state solution, which Fred Hoyle developed in a huge mathematical effort just before dying in his theory of multiple quasar big-bangs, which the cycle of galaxies found by the French astronomers further proved and my calculus of Moon MACHOs radiation, which any student of physics can easily corroborate properly explains.

All those galaxies prove indeed, with its longer 20 billion cycle, which goes beyond the supposed age of the big-bang its falsehood. As many of the recently discovered astronomical phenomena in far away galaxies show. Since we are finding formed galaxies, formed giant black holes, formed II generation stars and star dust, which could not have been born before the big-bang.

So do those supposed ‘lobes’ of the cosmic big-bang, which Smolin a famed physicist wanted to use to prove his theory that high frequency light goes faster than red-shifted light, as they were supposed to come from 13 billion years ago and so a small difference of distance should be found. Alas, the surprise when they found they are the exact ‘trace’ of the 2 lobes of electromagnetic radiation found in OUR galaxy. Yet they occupy supposedly ‘a huge piece of the entire Universe…

We have put just a few of the experimental proofs of recent astronomy to add to the enormous number of planets found all over the place, which reinforce the Fermi paradox, so you don’t think I am here making a case only for theory, only for my work in the 2 dimotions of time. So why nothing of this comes in ‘daily press’? For all the wrong reasons – religions are always respected; masses always side together for them. As Schopenhauer said: ‘the wise always say the same, the fools, which are majority do exactly the opposite’. And of course, attack ad hominem the wise.

Indeed, in the steady state theory things became soon ad hominem against Hoyle who quipped back inventing the mocking term of ‘big-bang theory’.

In the graph we can see some E/c<=>Mc processes of spatial expansion and big-bang destruction of mass, all of which have an inverse temporal, informative, process of much slower creation of temporal information and mass that balances them, in different scales of physical systems, from the beta decay that explodes atoms into electrons and protons (with an inverse slow collapse of electrons into atoms) to the quasar big-bang of galaxies (with an slow process of creation of mass-information from gaseous space):

If we consider the space-time an absolute continuum in a single scale, this more accurate picture of what we perceive is not possible, hence we come to the conclusion of present cosmology – that the Universe will expand and die. If we consider that galaxies, which follow Einstein’s dictum, compensate this expansion: ‘Time curves space into mass’, Mr. Hogg’s conundrum – how to correct the big-bang is solved. Experimental facts tell us we must accept the fractal informative structure of reality, where the big bang is merely the death-rebirth cycle of a quasar-like galaxy or local Universe, a scale of size above galaxies. So both together create an immortal Universe. Since in Philosophy of Science we must never deny experimental evidence, even if at first sight it contradicts an established theory.

 But Cosmology has a huge metaphysical component in its Greek sense – it is well beyond the limits of human perception, which we find to be the atom and the galaxy, beyond and within uncertainty and dark gravitational matter makes knowledge to say the ‘least’ incomplete.

Thus contrary to belief big-bang theories of the Universe and Cosmology in the widest sense do not belong to astro-physics, but still we can do science if we are minimally serious with the scientific method.

If the cosmic big-bang had sound experimental data, of course, we would accept it. As it does NOT contradict 5D physics. It would just validate a larger scale worldcycle. So we are NOT against cosmic big-bang because 5D physics does not tolerate it but because plain good old’ science disproves it. The scalar big-bang death processes of matter in all planes, from beta decay to galaxies is one of the strongest proofs of the isomorphic nature of all scales. But the cosmic one is not proved. So since all big-bangs are mimetic we reducesthe scale of the big-bang to a quasar scale, making Einstein’s EFE, local field equations for the Light-space time of the galaxy (reason why c is constant).

Fact is as the graph of SCiAM shows the full quasar cycle is longer than the big-bang cycle and we have found galaxies in all its stages. Thus by reductio ad absurdum, since we have found galaxies in a ‘second’ quasar cycle, hence over 20 billion years as ‘reborn’ galaxies, forming its central bar, there is no way the time age of the whole is shorter than the time of its parts.

Multiple space-times imply the existence of multiple big-bangs with different explosive size and speeds, all of them deaths of an informative mass or charge that uncoils its accelerated vortex into radiation following Einstein’s equation, E=Mc2, where a bidimensional or tridimensional vortex (M or e) becomes extended into a plane of radiation (hence the square of lineal c-speed).

Yet for each different scale the parameters of speed (c), mass (M) and Entropy will change. And so we obtain a series of self-similar big bangs described in the graph.

The single cosmic big bang based in a single space-time continuum, was devised even before we knew the existence of a faster than light, gravitational membrane of dark Entropy and dark, quark matter. So we first must define it within that scale of big-bangs as the big-bang of a membrane of electromagnetic radiation; hence a quasar big-bang, not a cosmic big-bang, which will correspond to the much faster explosion of a gravitational membrane, starting at the Planck scale of the gravitational minimal units, the lambda-strings.

This is in a way the conclusion of astrophysicists, which now study the big bang as a dual process, with an inflationary age (the gravitational membrane) and a slower age (the big-bang of electromagnetic space, created over the gravitational membrane).

  1. The Black Hole reversed equation of the expansion proves the quasar big-bang.

Another interesting time-related proof is the understanding both in scale and time of the ‘reversal’ local equations of time, as entropy is the local past dimotion of a worldcycle and hence its equations tend to be reversed of those of the dimotion of information and life, albeit compressed in time and expanded in space.

So what Hawking found is that the big-bang equations are the reverse of a black hole , because they are the reversed quasar explosion of a cosmic black star.

While there is not clear understanding of what the ‘Singularity that holds the entire mass of the Universe in an infinitely small point’ due to the ‘absurd’ backwards motion of the Hubble equation in lineal terms till are mote past, there is a clear proof the explosion of a black hole into a quasar will give us the same result:

Since the equations of the big-bang inflationary first age are exactly the same than those of a black hole, reversed inside-out, as the black hole explodes creating in its outer rim a ‘ball of fire’, advancing at enormous speed, through repulsive gravitational waves, till the wave smooth an isomorphic sphere of the size of the galactic outer Halo. Thus there is not mystery to the creation of the region, which will be reborn as a spiral galaxy when the entropic death of the black hole reverses its course, in the following eras.

In the parlance of ‘physicists’, the proper description will be this:

St say that space expands exponentially means that two inertial observers are moving farther apart with accelerating velocity. In stationary coordinates for one observer, a patch of an inflating universe has the following polar metric:

ds²=-(1-Λr²)dt² + 1/1-Λr² dr² +r²dW²  (where Λ is not the symbol of the 5th dimension but the cosmological constant) We use polar metric because the black hole expands with a positive curvature into a spherical form, following the commonest ‘entropic explosion-death’ of any big-bang material death. In the simplest expression we write: M=e/c² only that we are talking of a tachyon superluminal expansive wave.

This is just like an inside-out black hole metric—it has a zero in the component on a fixed radius sphere called the cosmological horizon. Objects are drawn away from the observer at towards the cosmological horizon, which they cross in a finite proper time. This means that any inhomogeneity are smoothed out, just as any bumps or matter on the surface of a black hole horizon are swallowed and disappear.

Since the space–time metric has no explicit time dependence, once an observer has crossed the cosmological horizon, observers closer in take its place. This process of falling outward and replacement points closer in are always steadily replacing points further out—an exponential expansion of space–time.

This steady-state exponentially expanding space-time is called a de Sitter space, and to sustain it there must be a cosmological constant, a vacuum energy proportional to everywhere. In this case, the equation of state is . The physical conditions from one moment to the next are stable: the rate of expansion, called the Hubble parameter, is nearly constant, and the scale factor of the Universe is proportional to .

Inflation is often called a period of accelerated expansion because the distance between two fixed observers is increasing exponentially (i.e. at an accelerating rate as they move apart), while can stay approximately constant (see deceleration parameter).The -dimensional de Sitter space, denoted dSn, is the Lorentzian manifold analog of an -sphere (with its canonical Riemannian metric); it is maximally symmetric, has constant positive curvature, and is simply connected for at least 3.

  1. The Helium problem.

Related to the previous quasar-black hole falsifications there is the Helium abundance in galaxies.

Nucleo-synthesis occurs between 3 minutes and 20 minutes after the (quasar) Big Bang.

During the photon epoch the temperature of the universe falls to the point where atomic nuclei can begin to form. Protons (hydrogen ions) and neutrons begin to combine into atomic nuclei in the process of nuclear fusion.

Free neutrons combine with protons to form deuterium. Deuterium rapidly fuses into helium-4. Nucleo-synthesis only lasts for about seventeen minutes, since the temperature and density of the universe has fallen to the point where nuclear fusion cannot continue.

By this time, all neutrons have been incorporated into helium nuclei. This leaves about three times more hydrogen than helium-4 (by mass) and only trace quantities of other light nuclei.

This formation of so much Helium was for very long considered the proof of a cosmic big-bang because stars could not form so much Helium. Then it was found that most of the imbalance was helium accumulated around the central black hole of galaxies; which has not been explained. Obviously because Helium formation happened when the black hole exploded with the big-bang temperature it is found close to the center of galaxies, and it was formed by the quasar explosion. So a galactic big-bang explains both its abundance and its location (the cosmic one does NOT explain its location), a theme we shall dwell on when considering the organic structure of the galacell and the black hole as a black star.

  1. S=T Balance between 3D accelerated time vortices=masses and one dimensional Dark entropy.

A big-bang is just in any scale of matter, the entropic death of a system. But all systems have an inverse dimotion of informative ‘life’, which it is represented in the cosmological scale by masses, galaxies which are time vortices that compress the entropy of vacuum into mass through its gravitational forces, are included into the mix. 

Matter folds one-dimensional ‘dark entropy’ which expands mass into space, into 3 dimensional matter. Hence 3 ‘volumes of expansive dark energy’ becomes 1 volume of implosive matter: 75%≈25% and the Universe balances as a spring coil in an eternal game of ∞ fractal SHM motions between galaxies.

Thus the ‘cosmological big-bang’ is a half-truth – the key method humans use to ‘invent reality’ to cater their egos – by eliminating and ‘reducing’ the parameters of reality that don’t fit in their ‘ceteris paribus’ biased theory, in this case an entropy only cultural view of the Universe. So amazing as it sounds to the reader cosmologists have eliminated the gravitational forces that bring together vacuum space into the creation of tighter, denser particles, atoms and matter structures within the vortex of galaxies, and through the warping of one-dimensional ‘lines’ of dark entropy≈energy into 3-dimensional ‘tall’ masses, ‘reduce’ the 75% of entropic expansion between galaxies to the 25% of 3-Dimensional mass, establishing a canonical, mathematical equilibrium between expansion of space-time dimensions (expansion of vacuum space) and implosion, akin to the same process happening on a lower quantum scale between attractive matter and repulsive electromagnetic radiation between atoms, towards a thermal equilibrium.

So why is the universe so close to the dividing line between collapsing again and expanding indefinitely. In order to be as close as we are now the rate of expansion early on had to be chosen fantastically accurately. If the rate of expansion one second after the Big Bang had been less by one part in 1010, the universe would have collapsed after a few million years. If it had been greater by one part in 1010, the universe would have been essentially empty after a few million years. In neither case would it have lasted long enough for life to develop. Thus one either has to appeal to the anthropic principle”  (religious concept that miraculously in the whole flow of time we are in a balanced point). not so it is more logic to think we are in a balanced eternal Universe as our fractal model describes.

Big Bang cosmologists however ignore the balance between radiation and mass as a steady state, eternal Universe as they only recognize as a time-future dimotion the entropy between galaxies – the expansion of space.

Thus when physicists discovered ‘another scale of space’, made of dark energy and matter which represents 96% of all matter and doesn’t fit in the lineal continuous big-bang the theory, because it is attractive. Never mind – the theory of the 4% is the canon.  So they just ignored dark matter too in a sanguine ‘honorable discharge’ for the big-bang ‘continuum theory’ to work. And because the entropic explosive big-bang only affects vacuum space expanding between galaxies or atoms, not those galaxies and atoms, which are cyclical, accelerated clocks of cosmological or quantum time… we have eliminated all the Universe that ‘matters’ from big-bang equations.

This is soo surrealist that it amazes me Æntropic men could get away with murder. Indeed, they merely discharged galaxies and dark matter that is not expanding but imploding. Since if they move backwards its equations they do the opposite of the expanding vacuum between them: they would explode.

The proper way to do cosmology would be to account as we do in those posts with both, expansion of space-entropy and implosion of space into cyclical clocks of accelerated information – galaxies, where we exist (indeed in an accelerated planet of evolutionary information). That is, to consider the wobbling expanding+imploding balanced Universe. But that will require to change the big-bang entropic ‘cannonball paradigm’ of Galileo.

We do NOT doubt the cosmic big bang on 5D grounds, but on real data, missed by ceteris paribus analysis, to uphold æntropic views of entropic, military lineal physics and anthropic, lineal creationism proper of religion.

We can consider the big bang, using the epistemology of the scientific method, with scanty mathematical formulae, as one of the great advantages of the simplified 5D metric model and is its pentalogic analysis based in its 5 Dimotions (or structural elements as ¬∆@st, made of entropic time motions, scales & still mirror-languages of space) is its logic capacity to explain any phenomena from 5 points of view as an alternative to sound mathematical proofs, which show the how and are needed but lack the ‘why-power’ of the 5 pentalogic analysis – the mental, organic, causal, temporal and spatial, mathematical, in a complementary way.

  1. Human local experience: we live in a vortex of evolving information NOT in an entropic region.

How dumb is that, when we live as human beings inside the vortex of evolutionary information of a planet, turning around a star vortex turning around a galactic vortex?

Entropy is secondary to our existence as biological and technological beings evolving fast our dimotion of information at individual level (process of life and aging, warping, wrinkling into form) and collective level (informative evolution of technological machines, aka meta life) and at planetary level (vortex of evolution of stars and galaxies).

This fact alone should have sufficed added to all the absurdities of singularities which are aberrant infinites obtained merely by extension of mathematical equations with no experimental proof whatsoever to ignore the cosmic bigbang.

But, and this lead us to the 2nd Pentalogic set of falsehoods, we live in an entropic military world, which despises the reproductive feminine Universe, so entropic, anthropic man projects his limited view of reality in the Universe to affirm the big-bang eliminating galaxies of information, but that is subjective belief not objective science.

  1. The ‘bad luck’ experimental proof. Earth’s experiments can replicate the big-bang…

At the microscopic human scale: big-bangs are scalar and what we are replicating is NOT a cosmic big-bang but the temperatures and processes that provoke the big-bang of celestial bodies, Nova stars and perhaps Nova Planets, as if we create micro-black holes on Earth, baby black holes, as explained in the next section when considering the true dimotions of time of Hawking’s equations both in 4D thermodynamics and 5D, when a black hole is born feeds as all ∆-1 seeds at faster speeds according to 5D and Einstein’s laws of gravitation, exploding=feeding at c-speed rotational force the matter around it, which is what we see all around the galaxy.

Thus the ages of the ‘big bang’ can be replicated by merely doing the quark gluon soup on the LHC here on Earth. Thus there is zero difficulty for the awesome reversed process of a quasar explosion to create enough quark gluon soup to replicate all those ages. Other matter are the risks of starting a big-bang ‘gas-9’ process similar to the ice-9 reaction of lighter strangelets (word coined by this author, due to the black color of oil) The process starts in a standard decay path of the Higgs particle that mediates the weak force that increases the masses of systems: 2Higgs-: Top quark; ∑ top quarks->BcB heavy atoms -> Formation of a black hole star.

In that regard,. 5D, reclassifies particles, to understand the 3 ‘ages of evolution’ of information represented by the 3 families of mass and quarks, which are also in close symmetry with the upper cosmic scale, the components of the 3 regions of the galaxy:

The Top quark star center (black holes MUST be modeled AS real ENTITIES, with a cut-off, ∆-1 ‘cellular substance’ as Einstein wanted. Only Top quarks (Higgs condensates in the parlance of modern physicists) turning faster than c-speed in its internal vortex (hence its enormous attractive mass, which increases with the frequency of its vortex: M=ƒ(h/c2)) have the properties at larger scale of a black star.

That is, black holes ARE top quark frozen stars, with positive top quarks as their cut off substance.

The middle region of up and down light human quarks.

The external negative charged, strangelet halo.

Thus the 5D symmetry between the ∆-1 (particle) and ∆+1 (galaxy) limiting scales of astrophysics is obvious and further proof of the symmetries of T.Œ and its ‘correspondence’ and ‘minimalism’ (proofs of truth in science), since it accounts for the first time for the reason why 3 families of particles and 3 families of stars co-exist, and eliminates the need for further theories and particles beyond the standard model:

Since the 3 ages of evolution of mass of increasing form – I, II and III families of quarks are symmetric – to the 3 regions of the galaxy: Top quark black holes, up and down matter , negative strangelet halo.

Symmetry between atoms and galaxies (protons positive top quark holes, negative electrons, strangelet halo).

And so once we have falsified ‘reasonably’ the big bang (we could write hundreds of pages on this, but we have to move on), we can now consider 5D physics, on the known-known Island Universe of our galaxy, its generator equation, 3 ‘relative planes ‘of existence, 3 ages of time and 3 organic parts in space.

But if the big-bang is not cosmic, but local, the big-bang of the galaxy, why we get so much confused about it?

The answer is simple if we consider the universe a fractal system of self-similar scales: Because there are big-bangs in all those scales and it is easy to confuse them.

We close Time proofs with this 13th bad luck experiment as it will likely mean our extinction as a species, solving Fermi paradox – why we don’t see entropic male, military empires all over the Galaxy – as Fermi put it, because nuclear physicists kill them all before interstellar travel happens with Nuclear bombs, only that they are of a kind much powerful than those of A-H fame, cosmic bombs. So the 13 proof should have suffice for mankind to stop æntropic males to destroy the planet, but as they rule us, the rat bites its tail. Power censors truth also in cosmology.

 

 

16.The creationist problem of all black hole and Big Bang singularities.

As Hawking said: “The trouble with the Hot Big Bang model is the trouble with all cosmology without a theory of initial conditions (meaning a limit to the equations): Because general relativity would break down at a singularity, anything could come out of the Big Bang’.

A singularity indeed often turns up in our equations when we extend them as far as they can go into the past; but a singularity of this sort is far from likely to be an aspect of nature, and instead should be interpreted as a sign of our incapacity to understand the inflationary limits of languages, specifically mathematics, which is wrongly considered ‘an absolute truth’, instead of a linguistic inflationary mirror that as all languages do have fictions, and repetitive mirror images that must be ‘cut off’, as ‘I know when mathematics is truth but not when it is real’ (Einstein); a theme treated extensively in our articles on 5D mathematics, which we shall look from the perspective of cultural creationism here.

The singularity is more of the same creationism – a mathematical expansion that ignores the advances of non-Euclidean geometry and the non-existence of points without parts, backwards in time of an inflationary equation as if it had no limit in time and space, as it wouldn’t describe a substance which ultimately will arrive to a ‘quantum limit’ or a source as it is the case – the dark entropy that expands between galaxies ultimately arrives to a ‘source’ – a galactic black hole jet that emits it; as we shall see soon, as always happens. I.e. consider a frequency sound coming from a source, a bat, for example, if we were to return ad infinitum the frequency measured with a long wavelength at a point of the air far away from the bat, we would reach a singularity of infinite frequency as it source. But there is always a cause, a source for that wavelength, so when we reach the BAT, the frequency no longer increases – the wave simply disappears in its ‘factory’. As it has a real source. So happens with dark entropy≈energy, which as a cosmic expansive ‘electromagnetic-like’ force, has a source in a black hole galactic active center and collapses warping back into particles when entering other galaxy.

So happens with black hole singularities, which we shall model as ultra heavy black frozen stars of bcb atoms with a center of top quarks, similar to neutron stars with a center of strange quarks, as Einstein wanted.

Since the origin of the gravitational FORCE of the black hole must be an ultra-massive substance. Or else there is no cause for its gravitational force (principle of equivalence between mass and gravitation). Where it comes from the awesome gravitational force of the black hole, if mass does NOT exist? if there is not as Einstein wanted a cut-off substance, which can only be the top, bottom and charm quarks that should form by symmetry with our atoms, dark heavier atoms? But creationist physicists shun off those basic tenants of the experimental and scientific method and the physical real ‘nature of Nature’. The just care to create new equations that should become real particles. For them bats do NOT exist, their sound frequency is infinite. And the source is not the bat, but an entelechy, a mathematical ‘hole’, even if their equations break before arriving to the infinitesimal singularity . So Hawking said: “At this singularity the field equations could not be defined. Thus classical general relativity brings about its own downfall: it predicts that it can’t predict the universe. Although many people welcomed this conclusion, it has always profoundly disturbed me. If the laws of physics could break down at the beginning of the universe, why couldn’t they break down anywhere?” Indeed at that point creationism stops doing science, and so Hawking will break, as we shall show all the laws of thermodynamics to evaporate black holes travelling to the past, and dismissed philosophy of science and causality in time as irrelevant. All this is false. The laws of science don’t break down in the singularity because there is no singularity. Neither Relativity expects singularities to exist:  It is ONLY because creationists are moving backwards equations BEYOND the initial conditions – the sources that are REAL – in the case of a black hole, a frozen star of dense quarks that cause gravitation… that everything breaks, and of course the experimental method rescue us because we never find BH evaporating.

So realist Einstein quipped: ‘Since mathematicians are working in relativity, I don’t understand it myself’ (:

Those infinities appear in Einstein’s equations in quantities divided by 0, which is an undetermined quantity not an ∞, and in fact means the local parameter, mostly time=motion ‘stops’ in the center of the black hole, as in all the vortices of space-time, charges and eddies – that’s all; as the vortex is deviated perpendicularly and ejected through the axis in the ‘quantum potential scale’ as dark energy, seen by the paradox of Galileo, S=T, as ‘accelerated growth’ of distance between galaxies, to collapse when re-entering them as mass, in a wobbling, balanced immortal Universe. So quasars and black hole jets dissolve matter into flows of dark entropy and matter collapses into galaxies, balancing each other. Reason why black hole equations are the inverse of a big-bang. So at best we can talk of a ‘Quasar’ big-bang, which is the ‘death’ of a black hole, inverse to its birth with maximal temperature, when according to real thermodynamic laws it evaporates its surroundings as it cools down and feeds on the light matter it heats=evaporates=accelerates=attracts. So from birth to death, a quark star, aka black hole, shows its inverse equations as birth is indeed the opposite of death. And this happens at the local level of the Galaxy or the nova star that explodes in a ‘little Big Bang’. All other hyperbolic, ∞ deductions of cosmological explosions are just the ego of creationist physicists trying to substitute the ego of previous creationist priests, who also thought the language of words they talked was not A MIRROR of reality but reality itself, creating it – so Allah and Yahveh were creating ‘naming things’ in Arab and Hebrew and quarreling about who was the higher God – they still do. So it did Hawking, ‘numbering reality’, expecting all kind of things to happen that never did.

  1. Scalar limits of perception in all 5D scales – the Light lifespan: ∞ is limited by experimental observance.

We can add a different ‘limit’ of the human mind, more objective – that of our perception of light space.

In 5D physics all has ‘entropic limits’ including perception. This departs sharply from current astrophysics and its ‘paralogic’ Kantian errors, of extending equations to infinity – as in the singularity of the big-bang and the immortal nature of light (which contradicts the consistency of wholes and parts, as light is born in stars and should not live longer, and it is part of the Universe and if there is a cosmic big-bang should not be living longer. All this leads to the obvious interpretation of the cosmic horizon limit as a limit of human I=eye visual perception of space-time NOT as a limit of the extension of the Universe in time and space. This projection of our limits into the whole is just another egocy ego=idiocy of Anthropic man that projects its own subjective limits into the objective whole Universe.

For a part of the fractal Universe ∞ are always broken by an entropic or cyclical membrane or scalar discontinuity.

The experimental proof is obvious: there is NOT infinite range in any force, as all have energy-mass, which limits its reach. In the jargon of physics range of forces depend on mass. But t is ‘obvious’ that the photon does HAVE energy hence it does HAVE mass, E=hƒ, so even if its mass is extremely small the range of the photon CANNOT be infinite.

Moreover the further away we look, we shall see photons of less mass-frequency, hence redshifted, as those of more mass-blue frequency had died. So that explains the red shift simply.

The distance-range of light is inversely proportional to its frequency-mass

Hence the existence of a limit or horizon of perception of light.

What is the limit of perception of light? As we have experimental evidence there is no need to do further calculus: Obviously the 13.5 billion light years from where red-shifted light of maximal z comes mistakenly taken as a time horizon of a supposed big-bang explosion.

It is again the magic 1010-11 number common to all structures of Nature, both in space-populations & distances in time-frequencies/durations and in scales/masses. We find it in the number of neurons of the biggest human brain, of stars in the galaxy, of atoms in a DNA code, etc, for reasons studied on our posts on ‘fractal ¬E mathematics:

Since it is the number that gives us in the symmetry of time the mean life of stars, and the mean life of its minimal light space-time ‘unit’ of information, and the mean mass of the largest black holes from far away distances measured in terms of the mean star mass – our sun, and the mean distance of the black out horizon of the big-bang…

In a 5 Ð, eternal, ∞ Universe, a big bang of the absolute whole cannot exist theoretically but also we have sound logic, epistemologic and experimental proofs that seems to prove the cosmic big-bang in which time and space started from a point that fits in our hand and pleases our egocy of being above heavens and earth, is a false hyperbole.

All this said we shall close this introduction to cosmology and astrophysics with a rational, scientific experimental falsification of the big-bang. It is though the last part of the post not the first, because for all what has been said, the big-bang ‘is not even wrong’ (Pauli) – it is just a ‘dogma’ that projects our male-oriented, entropic civilization and its lineal military view ‘censoring’ ½ of the ‘femenine’ reproductive complex Universe. So as any belief a rational falsification doesn’t work or else its obvious logic, epistemologic and experimental errors would have long ago dismissed it all together. But physicists stuck with its single time dimotion lineal entropy won’t deny a theory that makes them high popes of science; while our machine-worshipping civilization won’t argue the mechanical paradigm. So reason likely won’t work, as long as the foundations of science are not upgraded to the 5 Dimotions of Space-time.

∞ MORE FALSIFICATIONS: ONE FOR EACH GALATOM.

  1. Epistemological truths vs. Falsification of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis

In the graph, epistemology is clearly in favor of the immortal fractal cosmos, as its experimental evidence is stronger, when we do not ‘select’ the phenomena to explain, ignoring all other facts (implosive galaxies, dark entropy, irregular distribution of galaxies, objects that live longer than the big-bang, and other proofs we shall consider all of which have a rational explanation in the fractal, organic, immortal Universe).

It leads to falsification (a theory is false when there is a single fact it doesn’t explain or contradicts it – all of the above). Which leads to Economy=Occam’s razor, as the fractal Universe explains more facts with only one postulate – that we are made of Time§pace without the need of a background abstract absolute spacetime we don’t see anywhere.

All facts of the Universe in all sciences come from this first principle, which is self-evident – time and space exists – and already simplifies reality (there is no need for it to be detached from reality as its abstract background.

We can add other epistemological laws: the big-bang has no logic consistence (the singularity is an infinitesimal of infinite mass, which is absurd, time and space have a beginning which is absurd), uses ad-hoc proofs, forbidden by the experimental method (equations are moved to the past ad hoc in lineal fashion to meet the theoretical temperature, proofs are taken in present time and space as local measures, but considered to be universal global in all parts of the Universe in space, not measured and all the epochs of time, not measured). And finally it has not known cause for its creation. All those elements are solved by the fractal immortal Universe which is self-reproductive, hence it has its internal cause, it is eternal so it has no contradictions of time and space, and it accepts all facts, no-falsification.

So we gave an alternative physical theory of the Universe, which follows closer the laws of truth of the scientific method (Objectivity, Logic-Linguistic reason, Experimental evidence; Simplicity (Occam’s razor), Correspondence (previous ‘true theories’, parts of the new one), Causal, cyclical predictability and Coherence (logic and mathematical reason), with the added perspective of pentalogic and its 3±¡ Ternary Complex, entangled reinforcing causality. It proved that the cosmic big-bang is:

It s a creationist theory based in lineal time, 2 cultural traits of German, biblical military cultures that invented it.

It is completely illogic and makes no sense at all – for god’s sake indeed, a single point from all was created.

It has not enough experimental evidence.

It contradicts Einstein’s dictum, ‘the Universe is simple but not that simpler. Its false simplicity is based in a lineal equation (V=HoD, Hubble’s red shift equation), which only applies to the empty space between galaxies, NOT to dark matter and galaxies; so its simplicity is a reductionism that does NOT explain most of the Universe .  Further on at present, not even this lineal equation works for the observed expansion of vacuum space, so as we learned more about the Universe, this ‘Ptolemaic’ theory requires all kind of ‘epicycles added ad hoc’ to fit the new data (accelerated expansion, inflationary first state, which brings the logic absurdity to hyperbolic limits – as the first picosecond the Universe must expand to a speed infinitely faster than light to reach its present size, breaking all the laws of known known science). So the big-bang simplicity is not scientific at all.

It doesn’t correspond to physical & logic consistent theories with those laws of known-known science as it liquidates all of them, from the ‘conservation laws of energy and momentum, and baryon number’ to the logic laws of epistemology, but it is based in religious concepts – lineal Christian time & creationism – which not surprisingly pleased his first researcher – a catholic priest and the ‘religious creationism’ of mathematicians argued in the paper on 5D mathematics and its foundations..

And finally it lacks Causal cyclical predictability – it does not explain what was before and after; but the element it truly fails is one we normally consider a given for serious science, ‘logic and internal coherence’. It has none. Because indeed it is creationist ‘religious’, as it requires external creators.

RECAP. A single black swan said Popper falsifies the white swan theory. White is the color of entropy, black of information; every dark matter particle and every galaxy that transforms lineal entropy into information falsifies the big-bang. So there are ∞ black swans. Never a theory was so obviously false, so much cherished by Æntropic men.

We live in a balanced Universe, where as we explain in “universe in time’, Information balances motion; Maxwellian vortices of charges and masses, balance, entropic explosions and at the comological scale,the one-dimensional lineal Dark entropy (rather than energy) and its vacuum space expansion is balanced by the 3 Dimensional warping of mass in galaxies in the exact 3 to one proportion (25% of dark matter vs. 75% of dark entropy). It is NOT a lineal time Universe but a ‘wobbling’ balanced form. But when you confront physicists who have stolen the place of philosophers of science, with those facts that require a higher understanding of ¬E maths and ¬A logic, there is a huge silence. They are NOT interested in an organic theory of the Universe. It is the exact way in which religious people act when confronted with reason vs. faith. The faith of physicists and by extension mankind is today entropy, which is the dimotion of ‘death’, as TT-internal and eternal scattering kills an organism.

 

 

ENTROPY AND DEATH IN PHYSICS.

Big-bangs: Death of the informative states of matter.

And so once we have considered the fundamental proofs of the balanced Universe by merely adding the dimotion of information to entropy: SS=TT… we can consider big-bangs as the ‘death’ of matter, which ‘splits’ its SS and TT elements in ‘perpendicular’ fashion according to the antisymmetric laws of congruence for all dying systems, expressed in the 4th Non-E postulate of relative congruence between fractal points, which split its S and T elements in the moment of death. So happens in matter, with a higher geometrical perfection proper of spherical ¬E points living in a homogenous 5D world. In the graph we can see those ‘deaths’ of matter with that exact dual geometry – a mass explosion and a ‘solar explosion’ that leaves a nebulae.

We won’ surprise you if we affirm that death in physics is also a dual motion of maximal information followed by its entropic collapse, and so it comes to all forms after it reaches that state of maximal form – black holes that explode into quasars, stars that exhaust its entropic energy into heavier atoms and explode into novas; matter that is imploded by TNT and explodes into A-bombs. Then as in all other systems of reality, there is an unbalanced split between the informative mind/brain system which disappears into entropy through the height-information dimotion, and a spread of entropic matter in the flat plane of radiation. In the graph we see some examples of those processes and below a general view of the ages of life and death of matter.

In the graphs, physical minds have a still point in its center (black hole t->o, zero motion of eddies in its center… and when we die the mind breaks in two their content, one part goes into ‘memorial stillness’ and the other, the hardware, dissolves in a big-bang death, also for biological systems:

And that is why indeed the mind is a huge ego, an Aristotelian biased view in its simple self-centered logic.

While the real Universe differs from the mind in the fact that it has infinite minds, and colliding points of view.

In the graph, the moment of death represents a fall in information of the system back to the 0 point of birth, which drops the system in the pyramid of social evolution of the 5th dimension 2 ∆-scales.

So death has a simple equation and it is conceptually an obvious event: a system that has warped completely all its entropy into form, through exchanges of energy and information with its body-waves, finally exhausts its present body-wave state and splits and dies. Its field-limbs break from its particles-heads, which quietly remain as a ‘skeleton’ while the entropic big-bang, the amino acid collection of the cells, the citizens-corpses of the entropic war disseminate on the lower scale, the light space, the fertile soil, the battlefield… And we are no more. Dust to dust, ashes to ashes.

 

We have included below also the supposed cosmic big-bang, which is 1) a hyperbole of the scalar big-bang of galaxies and stars ( formation of ultra-dense quark matter) and the misunderstanding of the 3 solutions to Einstein’s equations, both in its simplest E=Mc2 form and its 10 EFE that give us 3 ‘topologies’ that must be understood sequentially in time as the 3 ages of pure space-time in the gravitational scale. The choice of only one solution, big-bang expansion, for the whole Universe, is the biggest lineal ST-upid error of physics:

In the graph, we see the full cycle of existence of the main forms of matter. The hypothetical cosmic big-bang was just born out of the choice of a single solution of the 3 given by Einstein for any scale of space-time, which in detail gave birth to its 3×3±¡=10 EFE equations, but can be fully understood without so much detail but equal amount of ‘truthness’ with the E=Mc2 equation (see Physics and Mind: Mathematics to understand the difference between a true theory and one which just adds detail without going further in the depth of principles).

In true form any space-time worldcycle of matter can be described with those 3 ages, balancing each other, the vortices of time space (charges and masses) explained by M (in the cosmological scale; whose equations are more natural and could be applied just by translating the jargon of charges through 5D metrics, which we just did only to unify both scales, but will keep adding in the future for a full streamlining of electromagnetism).

Then the 3 solutions of Einstein’s EFe are equivalent to the 3 states of physical systems, the ‘liquid-wave state’, the ‘solid’ charge/mass state and the ‘gaseous’ big-bang field accelerated state of ‘dark entropy’.

 

THE 3 ONLY TOPOLOGIES OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS: CONSERVATION LAWS.

The 3 parts of any fractal point of cyclical time in the Universe become in the simplest physical systems, the 3 conserved parts of the minimal organic Unit of reality, a ‘Planckton’ of angular momentum. It is also the smallest clock of our world, as its minimal unit of cyclical information, or angular momentum, used as the unit of the 3 physical parameters of spatial size, cyclical time frequency and ‘scale’ (Active magnitude):

h= mass (∆st) x area (S) x ƒrequency (ð).

So h, ‘Planckton’, is the minimal fractal organism which becomes the ‘cellular unit’ of all other species of light space-time, as Plankton is the minimal unit of the biologic Universe. All scales have a similar 3 component. So happens with a biological cell with a similar ternary structure – a DNA nucleus that process information, a protein membrane that isolates a vital space-time, the cytoplasm.

All physical systems are ‘reduced’ to fractal ensembles of 3 ‘conserved quantities’, angular momentum – the membrane of the system, sum of ‘cellular cycles’, which make each ‘Non-E point’ seem a dense cycle, when it is a ‘vortex’ of time-space (Charge or mass); its spacetime or energy, which is made of the enclosed cyclical forms and motions within the vital space whose boundary conditions are given by the membrane, and the center or mind of the system that guides it ‘through time’ with ‘lineal momentum’, setting the dimotions of the system with a finality we perceive guided by a relatively still mind-point-singularity that focuses the energy and information transferred through an angular momentum membrain. Those 3 elements are stable: St(nucleus)<ST (Vital space)>Ts (membrane)

Its topologic analysis is dome with Non-Euclidean geometry as points that have breath, whose lines are therefore waves able to communicate the external form and internal energy; while hyperbolic fractal networks that branch to connect multiple points, communicate the system with upper and lower scales.

3 of those networks, which are 5D planes intersect as physical waves or biological networks to form topological organisms…

In ∆±¡ scales in a static view we see networks but in a single plane we see space-time waves that carry energy and information. Entropy then can be often confused as transport of energy and information through scalar networks, which is an ordered process, vital to all organisms.

Because of the second fundamental equation of 5D metric that formalizes the Paradox of relativity, S=T, we can also perceive a wave or transport network in time as a form in space at slow motion . And so the Postulate of relativity, common to 3D Galilean, 4D Einstein’s simplex models in a single plane of ‘light space-time’…, and 5D can further confuse in Human science, ‘entropy, TT, ‘locomotion’, Ts and reproduction, TS, even a wave St of information. So the ‘E’ element of many equations of physics often is not ST but Ts or TT.

The fact that ‘motion and form’ are two sides of the same coin and form is the perception of cyclical motion at a fast rate, ultimately means motion is perceived according to linearity. Hence entropy seems lineal (maximal motion) and form cyclical (maximal curvature), which resists lineal motion (definition of mass and charge).

All is therefore motion, the ultimate substance of reality.

But as cyclidal motion with form constantly reproduces by the mere fact of moving through the same path, motion is also reproduction, which is the ‘causal function’ of the Universe. So every motion of entropic time, which enters within the orderly structure of a fractal point, its waves/networks of communication and topological planes explained in the paper on 5D geometry becomes an iterative reproductive system of spacetime.

Quantitatively this ‘persistence of forms’ becomes expressed through Universal constants for the different S, T and ST parameters of each scale, of which there are obviously 3 also in each scale.

Thus the Universal constants of reality respond to 3 5D Metric constants: S/T= Speed of Locomotion, which defines the limbs/fields of the system, SxT=Existential Momentum/force, which defines its body and T/S: Density of information, which defines its mental power, all maximized when S=T.

The constants of each physical plane.

In physics, for each fundamental PLANE of space-time, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-Planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-Boltzmann (ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems)

Once we establish the meaning of the 5 Dimotions of reality we can then ‘ascribe’ every parameter of science to one of those dimotions either in a ceteris paribus analysis as a partial space or time function or as a complex entangled space-time function in equations that describe a time-space being mutating its 5D metric through the 5 ‘graduations’ of motion and form, from entropy («, scattering motion, which is both motion internal and external to the being), locomotion, < (only external motion), reproduction, ≈, evolution, > (internal mostly with external shrinking) and linguistic seeding, », still perception in crystal and solid or mental states whereas an active magnitude creates from a field of motion a seed of form.

An interesting element to explain before going further is the application/meaning of the 3 scalar magnitudes of physics, temperature in ∆º, frequency in ∆-1 and mass in ∆+1. As they must be judged to belong to the ternary elements and the ternary ∆º±1 scales:

-Temperature (∆º scale, ST-open ball) measures the ‘wave-body’ equilibrium of the thermodynamic human scale, and as such it happens in all the delocalised vital space of the wave body.

-Frequency, (∆-1 scale, cyclical clock-like membrane) measures the smallish quantum wave frequency of the cyclical or sinusoidal ‘surface-membrane’ (electron, wave packet envelope) of the smallish physical scale, in as much as we are the larger observer so we see better from the lower smallish being its ‘outer cyclical-clock like closed membrane). So that is the scalar we measure.

– Mass, (∆+1 gravitational scale, SS magnitude) is inversely the SS measure of the largest galactic or Earth’ system in as much as it is the huge ‘being’, in which we are enclosed; and so we feel the mass curvature of our space-time as we are part of its ginormous system (and ultimately of the galaxy’s singularity black hole, which determines the G-constant of curvature for each specific galaxy, as Mach had it).

So the reader starts to see how we do fit and order, departing from the ternary structure of reality in space-time (equivalent to the ternary ‘Cartesian’ res-extensa+vortex+mind structure) and in scales (equivalent to Leibniz’s triad elements of reality : the SS-monad, ST: ∑ 1/n finitesimals parts & ∫∫dtsdt integral/derivatives into wholes… to quote two founding fathers of ‘serious’ philosophy of science that mirrored it).

If we were an atom we would see other parameters from other ‘monad’s mind perspective’ (ab. Pov).

This said what the equations of energy in those three scales mean is now more clear. As usual they will represent a function of present energy in each of those scales with:

-Maximal detail (Ƽ thermodynamic scale) or

-Limiting detail (c-limit of speed perception of information in ∆+1), or

– Uncertainty, given the fact that we must ‘absorb’ some h-quanta (Heisenberg uncertainty) of angular momentum≈present information to ‘learn’ about the quantum observable (as e/10 is the toll we rest from 3 to emerge as an 11 SS point in ∆+1 wholeness).

So as we have understood energy, common to the three, and the scalar, as in a puzzle we just explain the ‘third element’, the ratio constants, h, k and v or c (limit), with slightly different meaning to match the symmetry with the T, ƒ, m elements just described.

In the larger scale of gravitation, as Mass is the ‘scalar’ SS element (vortex of quarks, centre of gravity, black hole of stars) and we are in the middle of the system, as the ‘momenta-energy’ element it follows that v is the field-potential-related TT-motion; and the second version, e=mcc must be read as ‘entropy-disorder’ expansion and destruction of mass into entropy, in its maximal possible motion; that of the structure ∆-i final scales of galactic substrata, light space-time.

In the lower scale, however we are talking of a complete ‘reversal’ of perspective at all levels, from topology – elliptic in gravitation and relativity, hyperbolic or lineal in quantum – to function/form (essential concept in 5D, paradoxical always, coexisting in multiple elements, with an ∆º perspective that changes the parameters we measure; and certainly with a much more complex logic than the human obsession for absolute one-dimensional truths/perspectives).

So H is a constant of the external membrane (still view) angular momentum (dynamic view) of the particle/wave we observe. It is not the unobservable SS centre; and the interest of it, is its multifunctional roles, a theme studied in our posts on quantum.

Boltzmann ratio between the temperature frequency and energy of thermodynamic systems responds to the same concept: A constant of balance and action, between two limits… Among many manifestations of the same law in mechanical, moving systems, the third law of Kepler (ratio between the orbital time clock of planets and the spatial volume: energy content of its orbital sphere):

Since the Universe is more about motion=events in time, not form in space; we are talking of actions, of ‘present momentum’, of world cycles, and merely state that H is the ‘minimal world cycle’ of ‘energy’ of the quantum scale.

As energy and entropy are so often confused in physics since they are relatively similar (energy is conserved, entropy tends to disorder; energy though has specially in kinetic energy the most used concept a tendency towards entropy more than towards form, which would be better represented as in-form-ation, a present-future state vs. energy a present-past, forming both the dual components of the wave, so for example the magnetic and electric field can be treated as the relative energy vs. information duality married through the wave speed, and its µ, k, constants: c²=k(t-curvature)/µ(s-gravity magnetic constant).

It is then a key concept of the Universe of multiple clocks of time that an energy ‘conservative world cycle’ which represents the whole existence of an ∆-i scale, becomes for an ∆+i scale a ‘quanta of time’, perceived in a ‘synchronous moment(um) of space’, as fast cycles become ‘fixed forms of space’ for a slow observer (see key article on synchornicities). This is specially truth of standing waves.

What this means basically is that the H-planck event is absorbed as a quanta of spatial energy for a slow being as we are. Energy in that sense is a ‘memorial tail’ of time world cycles, ‘frozen’ as a space piece of ‘planckton’ or an ‘entropy Bolt’ for an ∆+i slow informative being.

Yes the Universe has its complexity in its repetitions and synchronicities that transform space forms into time functions and vice versa.

But we can consider of the many perspectives (quantum as ∆-i, has more information, less perception and so it is deservingly the more complex of all forms of human knowledge) its dimensions of angular momentum, which ad to the cyclical π motion of the particle’s momentum (p) the radius, r, or distance to the SS, hence it is the best way to observe without ‘seeing it’, both the coordinated relationship between the SS and the membrane, which are so often in constant relationship through invaginated paths (as in cells, where the DNA -center connects through the Golgi membranes with the eternal membrane).

So h, we might state is an excellent key parameter as it includes information on the SS x TT membrane-informative nuclei of the quantum system. And so as S x T = St (meaning entropy x information = present energy) we really have in such simple formula, e=hƒ=h/t->h=ext a packed information on a system, whose energy – the parameter that emerges in our scale of existence, and we have already related to the world cycle of existence of a being – is quantised in as much as h represents the world cycle’ of existence of the light space-time at the minimal scale of the ‘observable human Universe. 

We could say that h is the minimal quanta of space-time, the minimal being, the ‘plankton’ of the gravitational sea, reason why in our texts we call it ‘planckton’ the minimal unit of life of the galactic, light space-time universe encoding in its 3 parameters r (ST)  x m (SS) x v (Ts) the needed ternary structural information of it. As we can define a carbohydrate with the CNO(+h) elements. How many variations of h-species there are is the zoo description of quantum physicists, the details…

So in brief in the gravitational scale, m is the SS fixed scalar and v the entropy element, with the momentum being the present parameter of us, the beings within the open ball/vital space of the system; in quantum we revere elements, now the fixed element is not the SS but the membrane (as perceived by us in quantised h-quantities of angular momentum) and so the variation is not an v-lineal speed but a SS, frequency.

And by the same rules of ternary symmetries in our ∆º intermediate scale, the concept that shall dominate is neither of those TT/ SS extremes outside our ‘equilibrium’ but the present wave, which is in the thermodynamic equation, E=pv (resolved) = KnT, the true meaning of Temperature as a measure of a ‘heat wave’, specifically the ‘amplitude of the vibration’.

But for the understanding of it, as this is a post on Ƽ thermodynamics we can finish here the introduction and work with a bit more of sophistication on the basic concepts we have learned.

Most human measures called ‘energy’ are NOT about the 3rd Dimotion of energy, which ‘KEEPS its balance of form and motion’ but about entropic states of scattering form and expansive motion in space. For example in E=mc2, a mass vortex of physical information is trans-formed into an entropic expansion of space, loosing its form. So we do NOT measure its energy but its entropy. Human Energy then works as a parameter of the entropic scattering motions due to the death or big-bang of a physical system, exploding its form. This again becomes the case for Heat, which measures the entropy=motion extracted from a thermodynamic ensemble, useful for man to be transformed into ‘real energy-ordered motion’ in its ∆+1 scale. So we consider a general 5D metric for those physical scales such as E is a function of entropy that multiplied by a function of time frequency give us a scalar constant, so we write:

Energetic entropy (E) x Time Duration (1/ƒ) = Constant of spacetime scale.

The 3 conserved quantities of physical systems are the 3 elements of the 5D metrics equations of the 3 physical scales within the galaxy, whose metric, hxc=k sets the final limits of information (h) and motion-distance (C-speed) of the whole. All are relative ‘nested scales, ’ which change as we travel through them the parameter of time (frequency or duration), and entropic motions, giving us 3 constants of scale of space-time, h, m and T through which the actions of its systems are taking place.

The easiest human equivalence: Temporal Energy and Spatial Information.

Human closest translation of the duality of primary elements was in the classic age of verbal thought, Asian philosophies of yin=in/form/ation=space=visnu and yang=entropic energy=time=shiva, and in the age of digital thought, motion=time has become synonymous of entropic energy, while mental simultaneous space is akin to the concept of in/form/ation; since our concepts of space and time have been restricted enormously by virtue of the Galilean equation of speed, v=s/t which became as physicists substituted philosophers of science in the summit of scientific thought, due to its power as machines and weapons makers, the ‘only equation of time’, when in fact was just a measure of speed with very limited space and time parameters. As Einstein merely added – c term to that equation nothing changed despite the hype surrounding his work.

So we shall often use the terms temporal energy or entropic energy for time=motion and spatial information or spatial form, for space. As time and space are synonymous of motion and form they do have multiple meanings. So there are 5 types of time change=motion parallel to 5 types of space= form. Yet in fact as we have seen space and time are always mixed together, since human still mental one dimensional space is a simplification and definitely a single time dimotion of entropic energy or absolute motion is an extraordinary simplification of the richness of motions of time. Energy in that sense with its multiple variations of meaning is much closer. Specifically entropic energy; that is, a motion which is internal and external to the being or ‘TT’, pure motion appears in the equations, E=Mc2 (∆+1) = knT (∆º)=hƒ(∆-1) that transfer temporal motion through scales of the fifth dimension. This is the entropic dimotion of time and disorder akin to death which physicists consider the single dimotion of time. My advice then because of so much messy and simplified understanding of time in physics is really to take with some irony their work on philosophy of science, though as their equations have their own life and self-consistency those are ‘real’ and must be addressed with much more rigor, as we shall do in the papers on mathematical physics. But for concepts of time and space useful to all scales and sciences we shall use temporal entropic energy and spatial in/form/ation. Energy, being the jack of all trades, in messy human philosophy of science is also used for S=T, balanced ‘work’ which in fact is both space and time, energy and information, as it imprints form into motion, reproducing cyclical patterns of science. So it is better to define ST as reproductive work.

It is then obvious that the fundamental law of science, the law of conservation of energy, becomes the law of conservation and immortality of time-motions, which can be expressed as follows:

‘All what exists is time=motion=change in eternal trans-form-ation between the 5 Dimotions of time-space: SóT’

And it is the purpose of science in each subdiscipline studying one of the scales of the fifth dimension to study how one transforms into the other.

It happens then that the parameters of reality will be of time, space and scale; often grouped in dualities. So for example in physics we have ‘scalar’ magnitudes defined by a ‘scalar, social number’, such as mass and temperature and space-time parameters of dimotions, such as vectors with magnitude and direction.

In physics, for each fundamental scale, there is also a constant ratio between ‘frequency=time parameters’ and energy=mass parameters, which are the three fundamental constants of Nature, H-Planck (ratio of frequency-energy for quantum systems), K-B.

The scalar magnitudes.

Time only passes towards the ‘future’ when things change, and change in the sense of a growth of information. This follows immediately of our definition of the three dimotions of time. In biology it means to get older, and grow your information faster than your energy, once passes the first age of entropy, after your seed of information emerges in the upper scale, ∆+1 of you world cycle of existence.

In physical systems it means that time clocks accelerate towards the future, as they shrink in size and increase its attractive force (of all ∆+§). We can then understand the constant emergence of ‘new clocks of time’, of the three specific dimotions (hence lineal time clocks, wave-like time clocks and curved, vortex-like time clocks towards the future). How can we trace this ‘evolution of timespace clocks of physical systems on its three dimotions?

The study on how those first time clocks of the gravitational dark space and entropy (the limit of perception in the lower scales) evolve through all the scales of existence to become vortices of black holes (the limit of perception of the upper scales) could be considered the meaning of physics in 5D, and in the process it follows the same laws and isomorphisms of all other species.

Of course in this adventure of ‘living physical systems’, performing its actions of existence in huge herds as they move from lower to future tighter scales, there are many deviations, contours and sub-species, which do not make it, elliptic clocks and functionals which in mathematical physics are described as herds of herds across several scales of the ∆-dimensions of the being.

But in all of them we shall find three dimotions of time-space with its form and function, topological and bio-logical organic description of phenomena, which when plugged into ‘vital ¬Æ mathematics further reveals many details and beautiful, darwinian process among the quanta of space-energy (whole being measured in instantaneous space as an energy amount, in detail as a ternary topology with a finite time and space size connected by the 5D metric of the being):

 

THERMODYNAMICS VS CRYODYNAMICS

A good friend whose career was thrown into disrepute as it was mine, with an awesome global ad hominem campaign, when we teamed up to denounce the first attempt to reproduce the big bang death of Galaxies and Stars on Earth (LHC suits for genocide), Mr. Rossler, one of the founders of chaos theory, constantly tries to spread the discoveries of one of his masterpieces of academic scholarship, a paper in cryodynamics, which is ignored, as all what we do under the anti-quantum paradox of big-science (technology, the death of life, matters more than life conservation and those of us who defend life, are thus, outcasted, in the suicidal, childish entropic western culture). The paper though has great merit as it develops in classic 4D terms the inverse science of information in matter, cryodynamics that studies how coldness increases the information of a system and has the exact same value that heat: Ts=St in terms of the 5 dimotions of timespace.

Because physicists only acknowledge one of the two dimotions, the entropy dimotion (Dimotion in the jargon of 5D) cryodynamics does not exist as a different science, nor information for that matter, which is called negantropy, the negation of entropy. LOL. As Zwicky put it, physicists are rounded bastards, they are bastards any way you look at it, but they are also lineal bastards, they will kill information any way they look at it. So we define thermodynamics as the study of the dimotion of entropy and locomotion, the interval of Ts<<TT dimotions in any scale of matter of the Universe, and all what we need to do is to upgrade it once we have ‘framed’ its limits, in terms of 5D, which we will do, in the inverse fashion of most treatises on the theme, starting from the upgrading of its higher scale, thermodynamic of black holes (Mr. Hawking’s work), followed by the upgrading of classic Thermodynamics of matter (Boltzmann’s work) to end with some necessary comments on the thermodynamic of quantum scales (Planck’s violet catastrophe solutions). As we have already upgraded the highest scale (big-bang thermodynamics), we will start with the thermodynamic of black holes, which brings also the theme of ethics in science. Indeed, many papers on this account deal with the fact that humans are killing the planet of life as they build the planet of technology and their love for entropy In the case of black holes this is a key question, as if Black holes like 5D proves are NOT entropic but informative ‘organic centers of galaxies’, they will not evaporate when THEY become created on Earth by the Industry of Accelerators, which Rossler and I opposed globally as activists in a series of suits against CERN. It is indeed the most important ‘life-risking’ praxis that came out of Nuclear Physics in the XXI century… Hence we have to revise the thermodynamic of black holes as mankind’s future might depend on it. The error of believing that Black holes are entropic beast is in fact similar to the big-bang error: the expansion of a local scalar phenomena, the laws of thermodynamics by analogy NOT Disomorphic homology to the cosmic scale. Since what matters of black holes is NOT its thermodynamics but its cryodynamics; that is, its superfluidity is likely BCB and top quark stars below T=0 and the way they extract heat from our ¥-world.

∆+1. CRYODYNAMICS OF BLACK HOLES

Use of thermodynamics in the gravitational scale

Because physicists used thermodynamics of entropy as their metaphysical theory they love to expand it studying all kinds of matter. So they have used the theories of thermodynamics to expand their worldview to the entire Universe, with the faulty errors due to a single time dimotion, that of death, and a single scale. The results are some of the most ‘in-famous’ mishaps of science in the last century. As we have dealt in cosmology with the big-bang error of an entropy only dying Universe, we shall here only consider a specific case of that error, which on view of the present experiments with black holes and big-bang replication can have dare consequences for mankind, we talk of the erroneous, Hawking’s theory regarding…

 

Why black holes don’t evaporate for layman people.

 

We study here yet another error of the conception of an entropic only Universe. In this case the misuse of the concept of thermodynamic single arrows of time (2nd laws of thermodynamics), to define out of nowhere, the thermodynamics of black holes. Indeed, we have already denied the Universal validity of the second law, balanced by gravitation at cosmic level and by cold crystals of solid order in the matter scale. It is then interesting that while physicists have expanded entropy well beyond their ‘realm’ – gaseous states, entropic processes and the ‘acceptable’ translation of similar events into ‘frequency≈temperature’ at the quantum scale (plasma, etc.), they denied the law in a local effect in which it applies: the birth of ultra-hot black holes at the ∆-1 thermodynamic  level, as seeds of a gravitational species, which will finally emerge into the gravitational scale, once it cools down and feeds on the thermodynamic world.

The case is of enormous beauty and illustrates multiple laws of 5D metric, when properly interpreted. And yet we have instead a conceptual crass error by Mr. Hawking, who affirms the ultra-hot black hole keeps getting hotter, cooling down its surroundings and finally evaporates, braking locally – where it applies, the…

Heat. ‘Heat is energy that is transferred from one body to another as the result of a difference in temperature. If two bodies at different temperatures are brought together energy is transferred – i.e. heat flows – from the hotter body to the colder. The effect of this transfer of energy is an increase in the temperature of the colder body and a decrease in the temperature of the hotter body’.  Britannica, 1st paragraph, article on ‘Heat’, Macropaedia; Volume 8, page 701

We are just a mush in the surface of a rock lost in the corner of the Universe, departing of those facts we can talk about man’ Schopenhauer, father of modern philosophy.

The hard facts of known-known science.  

The evaporation of black holes, depends on this formula:

As the formula is filled with Universal Constants (latter understood in more depth0, and only two variables we shall from now on write it in a simplified manner as:

±ΔMass ≤ Konstant/±ΔTemperature.

Or easier to Understand moving Temperature to the other side:

±ΔMass  x  ±ΔTemperature  = Constant.

Simple, isn’t? It is the formula that defines the changes in temperature and mass of black holes.

We know both can change but in which direction? If the black hole mass  increases, temperature must diminish for the product to remain constant. If the black hole mass diminishes, then temperature must increase for the product to remain constant.

Two choices. If we write as Hawking does:

-Δ Mass  X +Δ Temperature = Constant…

Black holes t increase temperature, getting hotter and diminishing mass, evaporating.

If we write: +Δ Mass  x -Δ Temperature = Constant

Hyperhot black holes will cool down, transferring heat to the surrounding star or planet, evaporating them, into a cosmic explosion, a Nova.

So what chooses those symbols?

The Universe and its second thermodynamic law, which merely states that a hot object cools down and transfers heat to a surrounding colder environment. Thus it is obvious that Mr. Hawking got his sign wrong, and arbitrarily decided the second law of thermodynamics was wrong and the black hole will evaporate.

The problem is that the Universe and his fundamental laws, when they apply locally as the case of the Laws of entropy and heat imply exactly the opposite and what we observe: an ultra-active baby-born black hole, as all systems born in an ∆-1 ‘faster scale’ of the 5th dimension, have accelerated time clocks – which in this case translate into ‘faster dynamic temperature/frequency’ and so it is the black hole that evaporates the cold surroundings, transferring its matter and energy (bottom of the equation) through an intermediate state o pure entropic radiation, into the black hole, which absorbs it, and then inside, we theoretically assume, convert part into mass and part into ≥c dark energy shot through its poles.

Indeed, any ultra-hot object as a black hole, born in a cold environment as the Earth is, according to the laws of entropy cools down and transfers heat to the environment, evaporating us. And this is what we see in the Universe happening, always, when a black hole is born. It cools down and evaporates its surroundings into a big explosion, a Nova.

When you take an iron rod from the oven and put it in cold water, the water evaporates and the iron cools down, ALWAYS. And in the Universe whenever we see the birth of an ultra-hot black hole it evaporates its surrounding electromagnetic world (us) and gets colder, ALWAYS, till it reaches as a mature huge black hole a thrermodynamic balance with the cold vacuum that surrounds it.

In this principle, that heat moves from the hot source to the cold one, are based all the laws of thermodynamics, all the machines of the planet. If this principle would not exist you could made a heat machine of eternal motion, the biggest hoax of science.

Now we stress, the 2nd law applies to heat processes, entropy processes, and those processes of the quantum realm where is licit to translate temperature into frequency, as this case. It does NOT apply globally to the entire Universe, and in upper ‘colder’ scales of ‘zero temperature’, and ‘higher order’, the gravitational and dark energy scales.  So the example is a good illustration to deal also with concepts such as ‘what is truly mass’, how energy and information transfer asymmetrically between ∆-scales and so on.

Now, within the local symmetries where entropy applies there is NOT a single exception to the laws of Thermodynamics in the Universe. Everything in heat science and its frequency equivalencies in quantum scales is based in this law.

So Mr. Hawking an enfant terrible – a child of thought, to be more precise – with utter disregard of the known-known laws of the Universe, just chose to break the ‘law’ – one might imagine to shock the audience- changed wrongly the arrow of time, in one of the few cases it did apply (: and wrote the inverse symbols:

– Δ Mass  X  + Δ Temperature = Constant…

It is Hawking’s formula of evaporation of black holes…that defies all the laws of entropy, all the laws of time, all the laws of Einstein and all the laws of the 5th dimension, the expansion of Einstein’s relativity that I study.

And that is the problem.What the equation means is easy to understand:

Hawking affirms that black holes do exactly the opposite that all other entities of the thermodynamic Universe:

They are born very hot, the hottest objects of the Universe (in this we all agree), but then instead of cooling down in our cool Universe, burning us into hell, they will ‘magically’ absorb heat from the cold environment (+Δ), getting even hotter, breaking all the laws of entropy!

It is like if you throw a flame into water and the flame would get hotter and the water would become ice!

It is like if you get a cup of hot coffee and the cup keeps getting hotter ‘evaporating’, while it freezes your hand!

This has never happened and the mere idea was for very long in science a laughing matter. Since the laws of entropy are crystal clear. When a hot system is put by the side of a cold system, temperature moves from the hot system that cools (in this case the black hole) to the cold one that heats and evaporates.

But Hawking insisted for decades with an obsessive mind and charm. When a black hole is born, hotter than the environment, instead of evaporating the environment as any hot object does, it will become hotter and evaporate!

How he figures the black hole does that? Well it can’t according to the laws of time and entropy. So alas! He figured out that the black hole travels back into the past instead of traveling to the future. And that is why it evaporates. It is like if a baby will travel back into the past and enter the womb of the mother evaporating. Easy.

Indeed, he also muses after that astounding discovery that he could enter a black hole and come into the past and kill his grand-father. Seriously.

Here the error is that he doesn’t understand ‘time arrows are ALWAYS LOCAL, relative past entropy, relative future ∆information and conserved relative momentum, all of them adding to a zero sum (as past entropy and future information cancel each other leaving the integral of momentum or ‘energy world cycle’ that elongates the eternal present of the Universe). Simple and beautiful:

∫ Present Energy is a zero sum that conserves momenta and energy and cancels entropy and information.

It is worth to repeat it such a blunder of the many we will expose in simple terms using the basic laws of Ƽst here, harmonising all sciences:

-Δ Mass  x  +Δ Temperature = Constant

Defines ‘imaginary black holes’ that break the laws of entropy and will get hotter. Then for all the constants of the Universe to remain constant their mass must diminish and balance the increase of heat.

But the Universe has never done this choice.

On the contrary the Temperature of a hot mass always diminishes in a cold environment.

So mass always increases. Let us then respect the laws of the Universe, proved ad nauseam in all systems and write instead the symbols right:

+Δ Mass  x -Δ Temperature= Constant.

The hot black hole as all the systems of the Universe will decrease its temperature as it is born much hotter than our Universe, and so the heat will be transferred to our electromagnetic world and evaporate it, and the black hole will absorb it as energy in its event horizon collapsing that energy into  mass at the speed of light: M=E/c²

This is what Einstein say, what we observe in the Universe, what every black hole born in that Universe proofs:

The black hole is born very hot, evaporates the surroundings and absorbs it, exploding the world into a Nova at the speed of light.

Why then he broke the laws of thermodynamics, of Einstein’s gravitation – and the yet to be known laws of the 5th dimension and balances of the arrows of time, and consideration of momentum and energy…. running into the paradox of information, etc.

Obviously it cannot be because of science and the delights of true knowledge, but for all the spurious, wrong, unscientific causes of our civilisation: fame, provocation, faked news, etc. What is far more worrisome is that science after initial derision accepted it, and now incidentally physicists are truing to do such black holes at CERN, with the obvious risks of one being born, growing fast, swallowing the Earth and killing us all.

The error of Hawking is like the tale of the emperor’s naked clothes. One day an emperor forgot to dress and went into a parade. And none would say anything till a child pointed out that the emperor was naked. His errors are so evident and absurd that nobody dares to contradict him. But the emperor walks naked and black holes will cool down and swallow the Earth if they are born at LHC.

And yet the entire situation is so absurd that nobody will shout, ‘cover the emperor’s with decent cloths’. The emperor is Mr. Hawking  invested with so much authority by the celebrity P.R.ess that only an intelligent child – that is a new born model as 5D dares to point out the error without fear of making a fool of myself.

Still with the proper arrow the formula is a beautiful one, so we can now study what it means, once we have corrected.

 

The structure of non-evaporating black holes & its ternary symmetry.

Science is truth when 3 elements are met: experimental evidence, correspondence with previous theories known to be truth and only then mathematical analysis with the proper dynamic evolution towards the future.

Now, we observe that the smaller the black holes are the faster they grow in a furious swallowing path. And yet the Fermi Satellite sent in orbit to find the signature of evaporating black holes has NOT found the slightest signature of black hole evaporation.

So what to make of this? Obviously, the 3 elements of science are not met:

  • Experimental evidence (none) ->Correspondence principle with previous theorems (Einstein’s hole always grow, no hair theorem gives no temperature to black holes) -> Mathematical equations (improper interpretation of the symbol of time).

So both fundamental laws of scientific truth, falsification in the negative, and experimental evidence in the positive, prove that baby black holes do not evaporate, breaking the essential laws of thermodynamics, and Nature stubbornly imposes its cosmic order.

Today the fundamental theory of the Universe, the big-bang, is based in an expansion backwards in time of a lineal equation, similar to Hawking’s:

Hubble established a cosmological velocity-distance law: velocity = Ho × distance. Whereas the variables are here instead of mass and temperature, speed and distance and the constant is Ho.

According to this Hubble law, the greater the distance of a galaxy, the faster it recedes. Modern estimates place the value of H around 22 km/s per 1 million light years. While the reciprocal of Hubble’s constant lies between 13 billion and 14 billion years, and this cosmic time scale serves as an approximate measure of the moment of birth of the universe.

Thus the same procedure of running backwards in time a black hole mass growth, pattern would give us travelling to the past, the point of birth of the black holes at the Planck scale at enormous temperature.

Does this mean Hawking’s work lacks scientific merit?

Not at all, as if we respect the laws of thermodynamics, the ratio mass-temperature of black holes, describes the birth of a small black hole, which as all systems of Nature show an enormous activity and rate of growth, in its initial stages, feeding in the energy that surrounds them – the placenta of our seminal seeds, the nest in which the parental system feeds them, the environment in which the new species becomes the dominant predator; in the case of the black hole the rich field of electromagnetic energy that surrounds it in stars where they are born by gravitation collapse and/or planets against which they collide.

It is then easy to understand the importance of the formula to interpret the genesis of black holes, the mechanisms of Nova explosions, and the way in which the energy and information of the lower scales of nature (the quantum and thermodynamic scales emerges as mass in the larger cosmological scale), since and this is the second merit of the equation of Hawking, which stirred the imagination of scientists, to the point of accepting his peculiar interpretation is the fact that it uses all the main constants of space and time of Nature, whose meaning is still no understood in theoretical physics.

And so it hinted to the solution of the fundamental ending question of physics – what is the relationship and meaning of those constants, and how can we unify mathematically the 3 fundamental scales of physical systems, the smaller quantum scale of electromagnetic charges, the human scale of thermodynamic molecules and the larger scale of cosmological masses: Now we have written the equation with the proper symbol and alas, it is a very important equation, as now it follows the correspondence principle.

Why that beautiful equation is an equality?

Because the event horizon is a discontinuum, which act as an osmotic membrane, with 2 sides, which have the same ‘surface’ area, so to speak.

The event horizon has two sides as all membranes. In one side you are inside the black hole (8π GM), and there is NO temperature here (no hair theorem, black holes are defined only with 3 parameters, angular momentum, mass and charge). So the black hole DOES not evaporate because it is NOT made of temperature. It is impossible to evaporate.

On the other side of the membrane, there is though temperature, because we ARE in the Thermodynamic and quantum world, which the black hole swallows.

This duality of a membrane is perfectly understood in terms of Topological laws. The fundamental theorem of topology states that a closed circle, any n-dimensional membrane breaks the continuum into an internal world and an external Universe, with 2 different surfaces, an internal elliptic, implosive, in-formative surface and an external hyperbolic, expansive, entropic geometry,

And those are the 2 sides of the black hole: Internally the black hole creates pure information. Externally the black hole increases the entropy and disorder of our world just before it swallows it.

Consider any other ‘organic system’ absorbing energy and trans-forming it into its own substance. You eat, and first you disorder, increasing the entropy of the food you eat down to amino acids. This is what the black hole does in the side of the quantum-thermodynamic scales of the Universe. But then you stomach evolves the amino-acids back into proteins of your ‘own DNA code’. This is what the black hole does in the inside of the membrane: converts entropy into information.

But we can equal both sides, because they have the same surface, one side is gravity surface, the other side is entropy surface.

So the way to properly write that equation in terms of the duality of entropy and information and the 3 fractal scales of the physical Universe is:

This is the beauty of the equation of Hawking, when we respect the 2 ‘fundamental proofs’ of truth in science:

Experimental evidence (black holes always swallow our world in nova explosions that increase the entropy of our galaxies but absorb and grow in mass internally).
Correspondence principle (no hair theorem: black holes do not have temperature; they can be described with only 3 parameters, mass, angular momentum and in some cases charge, if they do have it; Einstein’s equations: black holes do always increase mass, do not evaporate, do not emit radiation).
Thus when we put properly the symbol, ≥, black holes grow according to the beautiful formula of Hawking, which in this manner respects the 2 fundamental proofs of truth in science – experimental Nova evidence and Correspondence principle; further clarifies the process of creation of mass, in a more detailed version of E=Mc², explains why the Universe is fractal, with discontinuous membranes between the entropic side of the Universe (electromagnetic-thermodynamic membrane) and the in-formative gravitational side that in-forms reality (mass-black hole side).

And why there are 2 ‘geometrical description’ of space-time (elliptic curved space-time of Einstein’s gravitation, made of accelerated vortex like informative mass clocks) and the hyperbolic, entropic, expansive description of quantum physics. Which are 2 different discontinuous sides of the fractal Universe that balance each other and MUST NOT be unified in simple terms because both are needed to balance the Universe.

On one hand you have what the black hole eats, our space-time world, on the other the gravitational space-time world.

There are in fact 3 scales of space-time in reality and that is what the Universe shows.

On the side of mass, we have a beautiful equation, which is identical to the tensor of Einstein’s Relativity, that describes a gravitational world, 8 πG Mass.

It must be noticed that unlike Einstein’s tensor, here there is no energy-entropy, but only the other 2 elements of Einstein’s equation: 8 π G, the curvature of the black hole and Mass, the substance of gravitational space.

On the other side, we have the same equation above for quantum space-time where h is the angular momentum of its clocks of information (so quantum systems code with h-Planck quanta its informative spin and form) and c is obviously the speed-distance of space, as we see light space. Space is made of light, as impressionists painters realized and Einsteins’ relativity principle that cannot distinguish motions from distances, or the spatial expansion of intergalactic space, homologous to the red-shift elongation of light space proves.

Our human electronic mind perceives light-space, through, its time clocks, SS=-Planck, is the minimal quanta perceived by an electron and Ts the speed of light, and H/c is so small that we have a mind that processes very little information and in terms of Lobachevski’s parameter of geometry displays a flat Euclidean World:

In the graph, you can see what i talk about. You see light and light has 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions. That is why your mind is flat and Euclidean. This product  c³ is thus the time-space clocks and volume of the quantum world, and its ratio SS/TT=h/c³, is the ‘ratio of information/space’ of the human mind, which in terms of Geometry is called the Gaussian/Lobachevski ratio of curvature that defines a flat mind. Beautiful isn’t. So many things hidden in an equation (-; Saper vedere.

On the other side, we have a ratio between the simplest quantum minimal, larger world and our intermediate thermodynamic scale, meaning that the black hole absorbs the quantum space-time (hc³), and first it converts it into pure entropy and temperature (KT) – hence the ratio; and then it moves it to the other side of the membrane, converted into 8 π G Mass.

Now, a brief lesson on modern cosmology. The Universe has shown to be fractal, structured in relative scales of size and with different time clocks of different speed. This we know since Einstein. We do NOT have mechanical clocks around the Universe measuring time. As obvious as this is people do not seem to understand it.

And we co-exist in several scales, with membranes and discontinuous between them, such as the Lorentz transformations that define transitions between the electromagnetic light and mass scales, the quantum equations of Planck (violet catastrophe) that define the transition regions between the thermodynamic and radiation scales.

There are 3 fundamental of such scales which we show in the next graph, the larger gravitational scale, the human thermodynamic scale and the quantum scale, with different space-quanta and time clocks:

In the graph we show them, with different space and time quanta. But all of them have a common co-invariant formula, which defines them as space-time planes of reality, with a ‘different time clock’ that measures the information of the system in the frequency and form of its cycles, and a given space quanta that measures its pieces of space.

And there are transfers of motion between them, called ‘angular momentum and ‘lineal momentum, or ‘information and ‘space’. There are many formula on physics to describe this space-time planes, and the easiest ones are those of Energy, and those that define its forces. They vary slightly (we show on the left side the formula for energy, and slight variations show formulae for momentum and forces in each scales).

This is the new stuff on physics, the formalism of the 5th dimension that this writer pioneered before this activism, as it explain the ‘whys’ of Universal constants, and the structure between scales, the reason of the exponential discontinuous equations between scales. And Hawking’s equation is a fundamental equation that relates the 3 scales together. In fact it is the only equation that relates them, as the black hole swallows it all. Swallows both the quantum and electromagnetic world and converts it into mass; it is the true devouring monster of the Universe:

∆+1(cosmological scale) : M ( 8 π G) ≥ ∆-1: hc³/ k T: ∆: Thermodynamic scale)

Now the formula has the 3 clocks of time, (G-curvature, h-angular momentum, T-emperature) and 3 space quanta of the 3 scales of the fractal Universe (c3 volume of light space, M-ass and K-entropy quanta).
So his work is essential to the fractal Universe structure and its 3 5D scales.

As such is a ‘beauty’ and it is a pity that Mr. Hawking was not happy enough finding it, and that he said ‘philosophers of science envy me, because they don’t know mathematics, and that is why they criticise the evaporation of black holes’. Of course, we do know mathematics, we invent mathematics. People like Descartes and Leibniz invented analytic geometry and calculus the two main branches of modern mathematics and they defined themselves as philosophers of science, NOT physicists. That is why we can have rigour with truths.

So to the beauty of it. First we must ask. Why there are two sides on that equality, which when properly written with the positive arrow of time is M ≥ k/T, that is the black hole mass always grows?

Because this equation is taken from the event horizon, the membrane that separates the discontinuous fractal scale of gravitation – the inside of the hole, or M (8π G) – which creates mass-information; from the outer region, the entropic, thermodynamic and quantum world, which the Hole is swallowing.

So we have an equation that shows how ∆+1 gravitational mass information is created by accretion of the lower scales of quantum light space-time (Hc3) and thermodynamic space-time (KT).

And it is precisely the simplicity and perfection of the equation, which relates the time clocks and space-quanta of the 3 scales of the Universe, what makes it so important. As it truly writes in the formalism of the fractal Universe:

∆+1 Gravitational Scale:  Space quanta: M x SS(curved clock): G = ∆-1: quantum scale/∆ Thermodynamic scale: TT:c³ x SS: h / TT: K x SS(T)

That is, the mass quanta of the gravitational space, whose frequency or curvature or attractive accelerated clock is given by G, is swallowing the Space-time of the electromagnetic, quantum Universe, whose clocks of time are here measured by the angular momentum h and its quanta of space, by the volume of 3-dimensional Euclidean space; after converting it first into thermodynamic entropy, in its process of ‘rising it up’ and transforming it upwards through the scales of information of the 5th dimension, into thermodynamic space quanta, k-constants, and its time clocks, temperature.

This is the analytical, algebraic understanding of the accretion of black holes, which absorb the space-time, c-h quanta of electromagnetic scales, convert it by this ∆-1/∆ space-time ratio first into entropic heat and then swallow it up into gravitational mass.

And the beauty of it is that we DO have here the equations in perfect form. We have in the quantum scale on top, the h-angular momentum, the minimal clock of time-information of the quantum scale, multiplied by c³, the volume of space (as we are in a light space-time membrane, with the 3 Euclidean perpendicular co-ordinates of light, the electric magnetic and c-speed arrows). And we have below the thermodynamic space constant, k-entropy, as entropy is an expansive space, and the time clocks of the thermodynamic world, which is temperature.

So Hawking’s equation properly defined as a time dimotion of information allow us to understand for the first time, properly interpreted the meaning of the 3 Universal constants of space of the Universe, in its 3 relative scales of size, Mass, Entropy and c‚ light space-time. And its 3 relative cyclical clocks of time, G-curvature, h-angular momentum and temperature: This equation is therefore a fundamental equation, which properly understood with the 2 arrows of the future, entropy and information and the laws of the fractal Universe duality.

 

Bcb atoms and top quark black holes – vortices of mass.

To understand properly black holes we need to grasp the 5D principle of equivalence between accelerated vortices of space-time and gravitation. In brief, if we define mass by the speed and frequency of its gravitational vortices, according to the equivalence principle of Einstein between gravitation and acceleration, those fast turning particles are vortices of space-time, similar to attractive tornadoes (E=mc2 +E=hv-> M=k  ƒ, so the faster the particle, black hole or mass turns as a space-time vortex the more it attracts:

In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century.

In the graph, for the pedantic observer, which rejects Newton as too simple, over seeded by Einstein, a final note on the multiple perspectives we can have of any event of space-time according to the ∆±1 or SS, TT, ST perspective we adopt, we classify the 4 standing models of gravitation as relative truths, belonging to the 4 perspectives of reality: S<<∆ =>ST>>T.

In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: S (relativity)≈ T (Newton) <-> ∆ (Poisson)≈ ST (Lagrange):

T- Newton is a moving CLOCK LIKE vortex of the same mass-motion regions)

∆¡-Poisson is a potential static field of energy gradients..

ST- Hamiltonian-Lagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.

S: Einstein’s simultaneous measures in relativity are a still, formal description in ‘present’ of the gravitational space-time.

So all are equivalent. In fact Einstein derived his work via Poisson from Newton. Today Relativity’ informative mappings of the galaxy space-time are transformed in AMD theory into a Lagrangian-Hamiltonian ‘bidimensional model’, for computer calculations, proving once more the bidimensional structure of space-time.

All are in fact derived one from each other, as Einstein took its beginnings from Poisson, who elaborated on Newton; and the more important of them all the Hamiltonian). Even if Einstein used complicated equations to describe those vortices as masses, the graph shows all those ‘formalisms’, which are equivalent with more or less ‘finesse’ in the degree of detail, they have. It is then possible to understand masses as vortices; which follow 5D metrics, since the faster, smaller ($ xð=K) vortices attract more; hence are heavier. And so the heavier quarks are the ‘cut-off’ substance, Einstein asked for to ‘believe’ in black holes: the quarks of the top quark decuplet.

The 5D model of black holes.

The 5D model of the fractal, organic Universe, does not deny Einstein, it merely expands its views, and adds fractal organic properties to the galaxy explaining better the function of those black holes, its atomic substance and working according to the known-known facts of astrophysics, in which black holes have come to dominate most of the creative processes of the galaxy. In that regard, you can compare the galaxy to a cell in a much larger scale, with mitochondria stars, of light yd-matter which end up being devoured and becoming the energy for the creation of black holes, the informative vortices, equivalent to the DNA, that swarm in huge numbers in the centerl nuclei and control its shape and provoke the reproduction of stars, with its in-formative gravitational waves.

Einstein had asked for a cut-off substance, or ‘atom of black holes’, which he could not guess at the time as quarks had not been found, but now we hint that black holes are as he thought ‘frozen stars’ of the heaviest quark families (bct quarks), and that should be the ‘realist modeling’ of black holes. As those quarks will appear in increasing numbers in accelerators, which are crossing the dark matter barrier is very likely they will be produced on those accelerators, in any of its possible varieties of dark matter that range from strangelets (s-quarks) to toplets (TTT++-quarks), through Higgs decay (H->Top and anti top).

Yes, this fast turning, heavier, more attractive particle can be the atom of black holes as it gives them a substance to exist. It is the the 3rd family of heavy quarks, which are amazingly heavier than our quarks, thousands of time heavier and correspond to the exact parameters of a black atom.

Now, we shall elaborate this with the new physics of duality and the fractal paradigm to further understand why this is the most logic, symmetry, natural solution according to the laws of the scientific method (economicity, simplicity) to explain the structure of dark matter, the Halo and the galaxy.

It is all there, again. Physicists ask for a new 5th dimension to make black holes, and we find it as a relativistic motion, which is proved experimentally (the fastest clock of time of the Universe are the bottom quarks, as top quarks have not yet produced in enough numbers to measure its no doubt even faster, more attractive rotational clock). And this superstring, supermassive quark is the cut off substance of black holes.

Now, all this in mathematical physics implies a constant growth of the mass of the black hole along the previous equation: M=k/T, that is as the black hole cools down, it converts via the weak force, lighter matter into heavier quarks that increase its volume and hence its area.

The last great advances in classic black hole theory were done by Kerr, a new Zealander which defined rotary black holes with or without charge. Those would be the top quark frozen stars with positive charge and the same density at macro-scale than a black hole acting as a relative ‘proton’ acts in an atom in the center of the galaxy. While the halo should be made of strangelet quarks (negative charged), acting in this symmetry between the 3 families of mass and 3 regions of the galaxy, as a relative negative ‘electron’ cover, with the ud-stars and planets in the middle, as seen in the next graph, greatly expanded in its detailed explanation on the post of 5D astrophysics:

In the graph the ‘sane’ understanding of black holes, which are born exceedingly hot and active, as all ‘seminal species’ in a lower scale of size, on the compton wavelength as a heavy quark particle, and the similar form of the halo of strange matter. this simple scheme, following Einstein’s search for cut off substances for black holes and Witten hypothesis of a halo made of strangelets, now again all the rage in astrophysics

Now, once we had the ‘solutions’ (Kerr black holes), the study of those holes was limited by the c-speed turning event horizons, which ‘absorbed’ the light of electromagnetic matter after exploding it, and ‘digested’ it via the weak force, creating heavier particles. But the maths were worked out by Christodoulou:

‘He had shown that no process whose ultimate outcome is the capture of a particle by a Kerr black hole can result in the decrease of a certain quantity which he named the irreducible mass of the black hole, M . In fact, most processes result in an increase in M, with the exception of a very special class of limiting processes, called reversible processes, which leave M unchanged.

It turns out that M, is proportional to the square root of the black hole’s area.

So it is all clear and nice, regardless of what ‘language you prefer’, that of 4D Einstein or the added scalar meaning for a proper, scientific real understanding of 5D (as we indeed do have infinite proofs of the fractal structure and scales of size and different speeds of time clocks of physical systems from galaxies to particles). As all is obeying the laws of symmetry and Relativity of the Universe (call it Einstein’s relativity or Absolute relativity, its expansion into several 5D planes).

Entropic feeding. The equivalence between gluons and mesons nonets: feeding the black hole.

In the graph we see what is all about with another astounding symmetry between the gluon-antigluon nonet of ‘smaller strong force’ particles that feed light UD-quarks and the meson nonet of light quarks and anti-quarks that feed the creation of black holes of heavy TBC quarks. It shows the beauty of astrophysical ∆ST symmetries. As the nuclear force (Yukawa model) becomes an entropic force with an e-x decay parameter of measure.

  

 

 

∆: LOCAL ‘LITTLE BIG-BANGS’.

The meaning of time in classic physics.

Absolute relativity, the philosophy of science behind this T.Πis even more radical in the separation of man from the Universe.

Every fractal part of the Universe is a super-organism that has obeys 10 sets of isomorphic laws, as parts of the same fractal space-time reality. We are all made of time motions, seen sometimes as space dimensions, hence equal in  substance though not in quantity (spatial size) and quality (speed of information) and complexity (number of co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, bits of information and bites of energy a given Œ-knot commands)

However, all these points are subject to the ego paradox: as every point of view perceives a limited part of reality to ‘fit’ it into its relative infinitesimal point of view or ‘mind, the ‘whole’ of each species understand only reality from its limited ‘one-dimensional point of view’, and considers himself from his ’10th Dimension’ as a whole, the only intelligent being of reality. Subjectivity is thus essential to the being.

And so it has been to humans, who always considered themselves the center of the Universe.

So alas, we shall latter expand those proofs of the falsity of the big-bang, which however can be perfectly explained as the big-bang of the lower scale of the 5th dimension below the cosmos, that is a quasar big-bang of a galaxy, either the previous cycle of the milky way galaxy, or the explosion of a giant galaxy in the local cluster, from where the local group fed on to reproduce the Andromeda and Milky way and dwarf galaxies around it.

A quasar big-bang we shall prove eliminates all those errors, the background becomes local and hence does not break Lorentz invariance (relativity), the galaxy has the same density of matter needed for the big-bang, a quasar is a reversal black hole explosion which happens to be the exact equation of the big bang (also a reversal black hole metric equation) the age of the quasar cycle tabulated between 10 and 20 billion years is exactly the same than the big-bang, it is NOT an illogic theory, as there are infinite galaxies in an infinite Universe the abundance of helium in galaxies does happen more in the center around the black hole where the hadron epoch formed them, and the ages of the big-bang do apply all to a quasar big-bang, and the local measure of the background radiation which FIRST and for very long was considered the background radiation of only the galaxy, fits, and as we shall see in the picture, in fact the map of the galaxy is exactly the same of the background radiation:

A galaxy (ours) and the supposed big-bang of the universe, which shows the same form and raises doubts about the local measure of that radiation (the reader can observe the central lobes of ¥-radiation similar to those of the electron, which the prestigious astrophysicists Smolin and others were analyzing very carefully, since they thought they could see a different light speed in the upper and lower lobe after 13 billion years of time travel 🙂

All systems are a sum of quantic cycles that absorb, emit and transform spatial energy into temporal information: T ≈S

That equation, decomposed sequentially in 3 phases, a first age of max. energy, a second age of balance and a third age of max. information, explains the existential cycle of any space-time field.

In a graph with energy and information coordinates those 3 ages resemble the geometrical form of a cycle that moves upwards, absorbing energy and information till in its 3rd age looses its temporal energy, collapsing back to its origin. On the right side, the same 3 ages show in the Taoist, Korean flag, where a line is the symbol of continuous yang-energy, which yin-time quantizes into ‘in-form-ation’, from youth to death.

In the graph, the most likely interpretation according to the laws of the scientific method, resumed in the acronym formula, E=Sce (evidence, simplicity, cyclical repetitive ‘laws’, correspondence with previous theories and ternary Complexity, born of the iterative repetitions of the Generator of fractal, cyclical space-time), further proved by the ‘ad ons’ of 5D T.Œ: Time dimotions, Organic structure, and Complex Ternary symmetries in 5D cyclical space-time, added to that formulae (T.œ=Sc3); the most likely nature of the big-bang is local – very likely the quasar big bang of a 20 billion years cycle of life and death of the Milky Way, a barred galaxy, which is today exactly in its form on the 14 billion years mark of that tabulated 20 billion years cycle of Barred galaxies.

All the problems of the cosmological big-bang both theoretical, metaphysical and experimental, quantitative can then be resolved. Theoretically the equations of the big-bang are just the entropic, reversed, death equations of a black star. Such explosion would account for the amount of Helium near the center of the galaxy, and the density of matter-radiation, which coincides with that of the galaxy. The asymmetries and form of the background radiation obtained in local measures will coincide with that of the galaxy too. Its origin on the local big bang from the remote past, or most likely on the activity of ‘Moon MACHOs’, the smallest black hole particles of the ‘triad’ of 5D scales of mass in the Universe, which if having the mass of a moon planetoid (the most common cosmic object of the Universe) will produce exactly the same redshift temperature radiation. The fractal structure of the Universe on the other hand will account for the expansion of the intergalactic space, the cosmological entropic vacuum scale, where ‘Gravitational transversal waves’ will act as repulsive gravitation, in the same manner their microcosmic equivalent in the charge scale act between particles. While the vortices of contraction of vacuum energy into mass – galaxies will balance that expansion, on the flat plane of the spiral.

In the graph, we see then the characteristics of those multiple little quasar bangs, in which dark matter made of the heaviest 2 families of mass (top/bottom/charm quark combinations that form the atoms of black holes and strange quarks that form the core of neutron, pulsar stars and strangelets in the halo). Thus they would account for most of the mass of the Universe. In terms of mass energy, as we consider on the present formalism a 4-vector momentum with 3 dimensions for space and one for time-mass, ultimately we observe a 3 to 1 proportion between ‘Lineal Space’ (G-waves of repulsive transversal gravitation) and the dimension of mass.

The galaxy on the other hand, does NOT contain repulsive gravitation as it is the interior region of the galaxy atom, which is purely attractive. Its configuration is equivalent to the theoretical configuration of the ‘cosmological big-bang’ now reduced to the barred galaxy big-bang cycle. And so we find again the ternary symmetry of the III families of mass, which form the 3 components of the galaxy atom, its ‘strangelet’, negatively charged Halo, its positively charged central top quark black hole, its 3 invaginated networks of information and energy (neutrino and photon background) and the plasmatic ud-mass of light mitochondrial stars. What is the role of the planetoids made of atoms in which humans exist. They represent only o.1% of the total mass of the galaxy, as almost all ud matter is in the form of star plasma.

So we might conclude, humans are NOT that important; an planetoids and planets on the 1 to 106 relative mass scale we find between moons and the heaviest Jovian planets which can be considered small not-ignited stars are the scalar range to feed strangelet matter that will end up in the Halo. This simple harmonic scale has only a problem: anthropomorphism. It makes us irrelevant, it puts the high popes of astrophysics back to Earth on their delusion of understanding the whole with a human self-centered perspective, and certainly makes sheer madness the experiments now carried out on Earth in search of self-feeding self-reproductive dark matter (strangelet quark-gluon soups, now starting to be produced at industrial scale at CERN and future accelerators at China).

We can now consider if briefly the ages of the Little-bangs that happen all over the Universe every time a Galaxy lives and dies, returning to the Dark World. Even if we were describing the Little Bang of the Cosmos, it is a necessary perspective for the ego-centered human to reduce its cosmic, galactic, universal epithets to the lowest of all perspectives, that of a microbial species, ‘Cantor dust of space-time’, ‘rational zero interval of the irrational infinite’, humble 0-mind who matters not more than mater. And this I advice to the reader, because it is the best way to survive and go around the Universe.

Even if the cosmos had a big bang of 14 billion years, from ∆+5 it would be an infinitesimal point dying away on the truly absolute Relative Universe. So we will call all big-bangs, little bangs. As that is the meaning of it.

Now this is the most likely reality – a Universe in the ∆+4 plane, beyond the ∆œ human perspective of a relative infinite number of galactic anti-atoms (as the symmetries of 5D are inverse and so we need to jump two scales to find a similar being, 2 scales of life to find robots-like insects, to scales of cells, to find nations-like cells, DNA-like humans, and so on.)

Those anti-atom galaxies might be part of a larger bang, the cosmic little-bang, which however would be of a dimensions that we, infinitesimal inhabitants of a galaxy anti-atom cannot even imagine and it is not worth to explore.

So we reduce ourselves to the description of the Little Bangs, we do know about, with the laws of 5D physics.

Death of micro-light waves.

Now in 5d physics, tiredness=death of light is not provoked by the smearing of light paths by dust and other ‘chance’ collisions of light, which would rightly as Zwicky pointed out smear the image of far away galaxies, but exactly as in the cosmic big-bang and general relativity by the expansion of the underlying space-time ‘scale’ of the Universe, ∆-1. The difference though is that in 5D physics:

  • The c-limit of speed only applies to ‘galactic space-time’, where the underlying gravitational space is ‘contracted’ by the -c2t2 factor of special relativity (simplest formalism), due to the frequency creation of time-information by light over the underlying gravitational space-time.
  • When this gravitational space-time is liberated from galaxies, it ‘stretches out’, dissolving its information into entropy, and its speed becomes ‘NON-LOCAL’, from the point of view of a light space-time observer. The formula is immediate. As V=S/T, and Time stores information, as information disappears (invisible gravitation), then C=S/o-information = ∞. Thus the Universe becomes infinite non-local and this allows that the cosmological Un+4 scales IS connected into a present ‘spatial view’ (the previous artistic graph).

Now this fact is essential to the scales of 5D systems, as it ALLOWS the fundamental symmetry between time ages and present still space-organisms. All SCALES of the 5th dimension MUST have a force able to create a relative simultaneity in a single time quanta that communicates its parts to create balances and metabolic equilibriums. Thus there MUST be a relative non-local faster than light speed, with less T-information, and this is ‘dark energy’; which we consider to be the ‘repulsive electromagnetism’, of the galactic atom.

It is then easy to see that the speed of such G-waves would be infinite in terms of human perception, and the quantity of information they carry minimal. Indeed, if we consider a ‘Hertzian’ wave at this scale, it would carry a bit of information for several parsecs. But it would allow a spatial view of the Universe.

All this of course belongs to metaphysics, which as we said is the true nature of cosmology, as there is no way to perceive experimental evidence  ‘outside’ the halo meaningful.

Yet the linguistic isomorphic method make us to consider a reasonable assumption that scales beyond our perception will follow the same isomorphisms of scales within our perception. So we can use the same formulae and deduce the non-local invisible nature of G-repulsive Giant Transversal gravitational waves between galactic-atoms and within each internal atom, to control the stars and halo of the galaxy.

Now from the perspective of a light space-time observer the space-time between galaxies, being invisible won’t be observed as a tachyon, faster energy wave, but as a dilating distance. And so it will be seen as a cosmological expansion of space (balanced by the implosion of each fractal galaxy atom, to maintain the whole Universe in immortal balance).

Thus the effect on micro-light waves will be the observed red shift.

Indeed it follows that what we call light does travel through the expanded intergalactic gravitational space-time, and red shifts.

A second phenomena also must be observed, namely the ‘internal’ death of light, as all forms of the Universe do have a world cycle. The light world cycle is likely to be of a mean 10 billion years similar to the life cycle of its ‘photonic quanta’, the stars of galaxies, which are basically dense configurations of light and plasma; the equivalent to the particle state of light. And this 10 billion years light world cycle is what we observe with an expansive age of light as it goes through the world cycle, further accelerated in the 2nd part of the world cycle (5 to 10 billion years).

It follows also that the furthest stars will emit ‘younger’, longer living light, so the further we look onto the galaxy, we shall see arriving to our galaxy, only younger stars, till a point where we do not see more light coming.

Further on, as all forms are relative ‘pi-cycles’, whose membranes do NOT let see the external universe except by its ‘holes’, the halo of the galaxy must limit as all membranes what we perceive from outside. This again happens in any entity inside a super organism. Our cells do NOT see the external world, and only the sensorial eyes do see it. So the next question is how much is ‘dark energy-space-matter-form’, from an inner observer of a relative fractal knot of space-time.

The calculus of an ideal pi cycle is immediate. As a pi cycle is made of 3 diameters, with outer holes between them, in our curvature electronic space-time minds, where pi is 3.14, we ONLY see through o.14 holes of a 3.14 diameter. so there is a 3/3.14 darkness, of regions we do NOT see from the interior of a pi cycle.

As it happens, 3/3.14 = 96% which would be the dark world for any inner relative mind point of view. As it happens dark matter and energy accounts for 95%, which is there and we do not see. It is then the halo the membrane that ‘darkens’ the Universe?

We do have for the sun the membrane called the Oort and Kuiper belts… But they are internal to the super organism of the galaxy, so we shall discuss it on its scales. but still they do darken part of the galaxy despite being internal ‘open’ cells. The galaxy though IS the true fractal point (the equivalent of the atom, darkened by the electron and the Nuclear force cover).

So the reader should understand how much uncertainty exists in cosmology.

Back to our theme of the cosmological redshirts and its now ‘3 causes’ (as always in the ternary Universe) we can write them within a Generator equation, this time expressing the 2nd Non-Euclidean postulate of lines≈waves of communication:

S (emitter: Original red shift by expansion) < ST (red shift by wave dying) > S (Halo, likely ‘blue shift’ back to create background radiation and reduce to c-speed the wave).

Those 3 components are just a case of the Fundamental equation of particle physics:

S(Fermion)< ST (Boson wave) >S (Fermion)

…applied to the upper cosmological scale.

The study of that equation in 5D physics is an entire field of cosmological research for future 5D cosmologists, if we survive the age of ‘lineal macho-man Neanderthal physics’. So here we shall make some comments on the death of light (ST cause).

As light dies away it is canonical in 5D astrophysics that entropy will elongate as all death processes the space-time, which in terms of the duality motion=form (Galilean paradox) means an increase of distance. Moreover, because light does have a 10 billion mean age (same for stars made of light, here the part does live as the neurons and the head, the same than the whole but NOT longer; so light dies before the stars mean life). This moreover explains why after 5 billion years, its maturity at the height of its world cycle, life accelerates its death-elongation into red color, till fading away. Which also explains why we do NOT see more radius to the Universe:

Light cannot come from beyond that radius because that is the limit of its life NOT the limit of the whole, but of its waves of information, its minimal part.

Indeed, it seems that light beams and light-evolved entities (stars) have a mean cycle of 10 billion years, after which they suffer an energetic big-bang expansion – stars explode into Novae and light gets tired and expands in a redshirts process, returning to its gravitational, non-local lower scale of dark Entropy.

This of course explains why far away light red shifts and seems to expand space: it is dying and beyond those mean 10 billion years an increasing ‘darkness’ is observed in the Universe, which a simple Gauss curve of probabilities show to be almost absolute beyond the x+1/3rd 13.3 billion years range.

Again physicists don’t see both, the dual space and time views of the Universe but only the temporal big-bang, which considers a cosmos in time failing to analyze it in space as a simultaneous system connected by non-local gravitation. So they think darkness is not caused by the spatial death of light, which they merely use as a clock of cosmic time, thinking therefore that beyond those ages we enter into a temporal darkness – and the Universe didn’t exist.

In the graph, we illustrate how complex physics, using the same data that Simplex physics of a single space-time continuum can resolve the puzzles of the Universe. Cosmologists have found that light coming from far away galaxies seems to decelerate and accelerate its red shift till dissolving around 1010-11 years after its emission. And they affirm this is a proof of an expanding Universe, as they apply a local phenomenon, the life/death curve of light self-similar to the life-death curve of any entity, which increases its frequency till its ½ life and then decreases, becoming tired till death, to the entire space-time of the Universe (a global symmetry).

The tiredness and world cycle life-curve of light however only applies to a local phenomenon: light tires and red shifts at the end of its journey, dissolving back into gravitational dark-Entropy, which is perceived as an expansion of the light-membrane, but that effect is compensated by the contraction of space into mass in the galactic vortices giving us a zero-sum.

5D Lorentz Invariance: A 4D cosmic electron membrane of the canonical big-bang.

We do NOT deny the cosmic scale of the big-bang, which 5D somehow makes logic (it would just be another scale of big-bang of an atom-Universe. There are certain basic numbers that back that opinion. The number of galaxies, 1011 is the constant of social order between planes of the 5th dimension.

The relationship between the Force of Gravitation and Charge (temporal curvature), is according to some estimates (already noticed by Feynman and I believe Eddington), the same that between the radius of the proton and the Cosmos (spatial length). So it fits in 5D Metric: T x S = K, better than a possible ‘local cluster’ big-bang with lesser radius. But those numbers have been varying a few potencies of 10 here and there. In any case it is a proof of the force of 5D metric that even if we ultimately reject the cosmic big-bang for lack of experimental data, we can for the first time explaining rationally without creationist ideas.

The spatial symmetry on 5D big-bang; all galaxies are in the expanding membrane of the ‘electronic cover’ of the cosmic neutron explains Lorentz Invariance nicely.

Now in the parlance of physics, this mind point of view is called ‘relativity’, which implies we cannot distinguish frames of reference when we choose one at its center.

Now in the present format, the ‘subjective use of the human frame of reference’ at the center of the big bang, could seem a misinterpretation of the meaning of the Lorentz Invariance to suit ‘us’ – ultimately another ‘anthropomorphic’, man in the center, reality only what man can see, subjective theory of religious ‘nature’.

But this would be an easy critic. An not an accurate one. Since In the case of the previous picture for that to be real – not frame of reference – the solution of physicists is obvious and quite smart and realistic: the entire picture is actually NOT a ‘volume’ but a membrane, like the expanding surface of a globe. If all the galaxies were pegged in the expanding surface of an TS-Membrane any POINT would see the rest of the cosmos which being so ‘large’ would appear as a flat surface, in the same way we see the Earth as a flat surface and any point on the Earth could in principle if light would curve a bit through the surface see the entire globe as a flat picture.

Of course those models are available in the ‘avalanche’ of ‘fantaphysics’, that is mathematical games without a criterion of selection. On my view the more interesting is the one of Mr. Merab Gogberashvili where he shows that if the Universe is considered as a thin shell (a mathematical synonym for “brane”) expanding in 5-dimensional space then it is possible to obtain one scale for particle theory corresponding to the 5-dimensional cosmological constant and Universe thickness, since it solves the hierarchy problem in a similar fashion – in this case the smaller scale of particles do have more ‘energy and information – that extra-dimension and further on our Universe is stable since the extra component of the Einstein field equations giving the localized solution for matter fields coincides with the one of the conditions of stability.

Latter the Americans proposed the closely related Randall–Sundrum scenarios, which have as usual become more popular with the Anglo-Saxon drum beat of self-propaganda (this is common in the history of science since the times of Leibniz to the times of Landau->Hawking and Linde->Guth).

Now in our terminology this means the following, generalizing it to 5D Geometry, which is NOT so much concerned with ‘spatial geometry’ but with the dimotions of energy and information that transit between scales:

Now one of the beauties of 5D science is that we can take any relative ∆±i scale in our analysis of reality and change slightly the perspective and will get a meaningful view of it all. So when we take the largest ∆+i perspective on the being we see it as indistinguishable atoms, but if we have an ∆-1 perspective it looks like a ‘living cell’, which is a very convenient perspective to study the whole, as we observe it perfectly together, surrounded by a cyclical time membrane, with a nice central o-point and a series of perfectly designed organic cycles.

This is the perspective we can have of a nation, as a cell of the superorganism of history with its borders, human DNAs in its homes connected by networks of economic energy and legal information. Or the perspective of a human cell-citizen, or a biological cell. This is the best way to study the galaxy as a cell of the superorganism of the Universe made of 1011 of such cells. The structure of the galaxy cell thus will ‘focus’ this article, since it is the perspective, which we can elaborate with a minimal amount of information to make it a likely truth.

Of the Universe as a whole we cannot make such a big statement of truth, as astrophysicists, human ego-centered masters of the Universe think, but we can keep exploring their cosmic big-bang, and explain it as a 5D probable truth. We shall see it is of the two possible explanations – an extensive Universe of multiple atoms/cells/galaxies well beyond the limit of the cosmic horizon, vs. a growing beta decay universe or a cellular organism, the 2nd likely explanation. So for probabilities of truth, we range them as:

Max. truth: quasar big-bang < Med. Truth: Cosmic big-bang < Min. truth: cellular cosmos.

Ultimately though the 3 of them admit a larger ∆+1 scale of the Universe, a… Hyper-Universe and big bang death.

The mimetic ages of Little quasar bangs.

Now it what follows we are going to deal mainly with 1 theme, the organic structure of the Galaxy and its parts according to the Generator Equation.

It is within that structure that big-bangs of any of the scales of matter represent merely the entropic death of the matter vortex in a quanta of time according to the equation of death of any system, physical or not

Death-big bang equation: S<<T: Max. T x Min. S->Ts=∞ x S=0

So it is not a big deal, which is the scale. As we have explained it matches 5D metric including the inflaton field: T x S = K. Thus in an infinitesimal time quanta (10-42 in the big bang), in a similar account the Universe expanded a similar quantity (1042 proton radius in the big bang). It is simply too large with the data we observe. So we imagine that the QUASAR-bang will follow exactly the same metric, and ages of the cosmic bang, but the relative Time speed of the Galaxy when the bang-death of entropy of the black hole took place will be slower, of the range of top quark interactions (10-25 seconds) and the diameter of the central black hole once it expanded after its death will be that of the galaxy: 1021 meters.

In brief, the ages of the Little bang are far less speculative as sciences must be than the big-bang. Its first quanta of ‘death’ of the black hole did start when the speed of time clocks of the black hole went under the mean life of its particles, top quarks, which are the likely cut-off atoms of the black star. As the little bang expands the galaxy in a similar fashion to a double beta decay that expands the nucleus up to 100.000 times to create a hydrogen atom.

Thus time slows down to the ‘year’ cycle of its ∆-1 ‘cell’, which is the angular momentum of most star systems, the ‘photons of the galaxy-atom’, taking our planet orbit as a mean for them, in the same manner that the cycles of a living human being slow down from its faster seminal system to the day cycle – the mean cycle of its cells, the ∆-1 scale.

This is the application of 5D physics, NOT of weird laws of time. But of the metric of the 5th dimension and the processes of growth of systems which are synchronized to the slow down of its internal time cycles at the ∆-1 cellular lower level. At this moment the system is synchronic between its 3 ∆±1 scales and its space-time measures are in relative proportion.

What is then the growth of the little big-bang. Simple to calculate. If a nucleus of an atom grows 100.000 times to become the electron radius, we just need to multiply the year time of the ‘new galaxy-atom’ for 100.000 times of expansion, and the galaxy should be approximately 100.000 light year of radius.

The same happens in the atom, even if physicists do not understand as they do NOT use variable time clocks, DO NOT relate time clocks to space curvature and attractive power.

But we do have all the data. So in the atomic nucleus, the clock speed slows down ≈ the attractive power diminishes ≈ the curvature diminishes ≈ as the radius of the strong force grows to the radius (clock-curvature-speed-angular momentum) of the Electron. And again we can do similar calculus: the electron of the Bohr radius has a mean speed of 3.000 kms, which multiplied by the fine structure constant gives us the c-speed, or space- time speed of the proton-black hole vortex radius, which is 100 times stronger than the electronic force – again the same relationships in proportions and decametric scales).

So back to the galaxy that should stop its expansive phase when the clock goes down to a year orbital sun and 100.000 light year diameter. Well, thus experimental evidence confirms this process? As it happens 100.000 years light is the diameter of the galaxy.

This also means that the meaningful nucleus of the galaxy should be around a π light year or parsec, even if the ‘quark zone’ – or true central black hole is even smaller, but we must remember the quarks are surrounded of a cloud of ‘negative pions’, ‘massive particles, equivalent to massive stars. It is this the case of the black hole?

As it happens, the central parsec around Sagittarius A* contains thousands of stars. Although most of them are old red main-sequence stars, the Galactic Center is also rich in massive stars. More than 100 OB and Wolf–Rayet stars have been identified there so far. They seem to have all been formed in a single star formation event a few million years ago. The existence of these relatively young stars was a surprise to experts, who expected the tidal forces from the central black hole to prevent their formation. This paradox of youth is even stronger for stars that are on very tight orbits around Sagittarius A*, such as S2 and S0-102.

5D symmetry shows the, organic structure of the galaxy that follows those ternary symmetries and the clueless nature of our astronomers (-; though I will not pound on them, since actually I do like astronomers much more than nuclear physicists – they do nothing wrong and had anyone taken seriously 5D in my youth when doing a master at Columbia U. I might have chosen to spend my life in the nice Palma Island Chilean mountains or Hawaii volcanoes, looking at the stars (-; But they couldn’t care less for the galactic organism )-;

 In graph a quasar Little-bang is the same process that a cosmic bang limited to the inversion of a central black hole, which dies and goes through the same phases the inflation period, is the period of black hole explosion with its gravitational waves that create the underlying structure over which the following epochs will produce as energy cools down the different particles of the galaxy. This is what it is recreated today at CERN, and might provoke the strangelet formation on its ‘initial ages’, which are stable usd lumps that could swallow the Earth.

There is besides the job of straighten up of the errors of physics regarding its space-time symmetries a more general analysis of great beauty, which consists in the translation of the ‘Ages of the Little-bangs’, of any type of scales into the ages of the known-known particles of matter, as the slow down of speeds of time and enlarging of spaces allows the symmetry to break into the positive and negative sides of each ‘plane’ of the Universe.

It is not so different from classic astrophysics, except that is simpler more symmetric, experimentally sound, theoretically meaning and so it makes sense (-; We can ad for the pleasure astrophysicists crunching numbers the unknown scales of the possible atomic cosmos.

They start ‘faster’ than we do. The little bang of the most likely scale of Galactic matter, explains HOW FROM THE c-faster ok colder, super fast time cycles of the Higgs-top quark-black hole fields, through the ‘creation of ± symmetries of speed, energy, charge, and momentum’, all other forces and particles are born.

The chronology of the Galaxy describes the history and future of the Galaxy according to Little Bang cosmology, the scientific model of how the Galaxy developed by this point of existence, which is a world I itself (;

The big bang though of the atomic cosmos stars its time on the Planck epoch, using the cosmological time parameter of commoving coordinates (never mind what it means, nothing really 🙂

As of 2016, this expansion is estimated to have begun 13.799 ± 0.021billion years ago! – you know how ‘precise’ are the scholars who know nothing but think to know it all – humans after all. Wouldn’t be a bit less ‘obvious’ to say just 13.8? (-: LOL, do remember that the exact minute of creation was precisely estimated last century by a British priest on the A$$-breeders calendar, now running at 5777 – 7 being the magic number of Babel…

It is convenient to divide the evolution of the atomic Galaxy or cosmic string, so far into three phases. They just differ in its reality. In brief, the first age of the cosmic big bang is largely speculative and simply accelerates time to the minimal time possible in physical parameters of the ‘light speed limit’, the so called Planck Units of mass, time (the speed of light crossing the minimal radius of a string-neutrino, etc.)

The never proved age of Cosmic physics.

Before a time classified as a Planck time, 10-43 seconds, all of the four fundamental forces are presumed to have been unified into one force. All matter, energy, space and time are presumed to have exploded outward from the original singularity. Nothing is known of this period. In the era around one Planck time, 10-43 seconds, it is projected by present modeling of the fundamental forces that the gravity force begins to differentiate from the other three forces. This is the first of the spontaneous symmetry breaks, which lead to the four observed types of interactions in the present universe.

Looking backward, the general idea is that back beyond 1 Planck time we can make no meaningful observations within the framework of classical gravitation. One way to approach the formulation of the Planck time is presented by Hsu. One of the characteristics of a black hole is that there is an event horizon beyond which we can obtain no information – scales smaller than that are hidden from the outside world. For a given enclosed mass, this limit is on the order of

L=GM/c

where G is the gravitational constant and c is the speed of light. But from the uncertainty principle and the De Broglie wavelength, we can infer that the smallest scale at which we could locate the event horizon would be the Compton wavelength:   l=h/mc

Equating L and λ, we obtain a characteristic mass called the Planck mass. Substituting this mass back into one of the length expressions gives the Planck length

which happens to the be length of a neutrino, something physicists have not noticed too much but makes the neutrino the clearest candidate to be the quanta of the gravitomagnetic waves of the underlying structure under light. and the neutrino theory of light, the clearest form in which light is formed, as light travels its minima time frequency across this length is called the Planck time:

Tp=√h/Gc5 =1.35 x 10-43 sec

Which therefore will be in 5d physics the minimal wave length of light, the minimal ‘planckton’. And we will return to that.

Inflationary Period

In classic cosmology, Triggered by the symmetry breaking that separates off the strong force, models suggest an extraordinary inflationary phase in the era 10-36 seconds to 10-32 seconds. More expansion is presumed to have occurred in this instant than in the entire period ( 14 billion years?) since.

Lemonick and Nash in a popular article for Time describe inflation as an “amendment to the original Big Bang” as follows: “when the universe was less than a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a second old, it briefly went through a period of superchanged expansion, ballooning from the size of a proton to the size of a galaxy (and thus expanding at many, many times the speed of light). Then the expansion slowed to a much more stately pace. Improbable as the theory sounds, it has held up in every observation astronomers have managed to make. The inflationary epoch may have expanded the universe by 1020 or 1030 in this incredibly brief time. The inflationary hypothesis offers a way to deal with the horizon problem and the flatness problem of cosmological models.”

Never mind it introduces even more nonsense than the big-bang. It just fits some creationist mathematics and that is enough. The problem of course remains: to make such a huge Universe collapse so fast and still maintain the C-speed limit of light is just absurd, impossible when on top, we must connect al its parts. So they needed the inflaton concept and they fitted it into the mess of the big-bang.

So what inflation means in 5D cosmology when we reduce its parameters to the galaxy? Merely the expansion of the black hole ‘neutrino and gravitational wave’ over which light will be imprinted in a second phase.

Of this the Grand Unification Theory (GUT) – the final unification that has been called a “super grand unification theory”, and becoming more popular is the designation “theory of everything” (TOE) says very little. Since physicists “theories of everything” are separated by two great leaps beyond the experiments we could ever hope to do on the Earth.

In that first phase, the very earliest atom-cosmos was so cold and perfectly ordered that its time clocks with no entropy could turn at an amazing faster than c speed of 1000 z in a present ‘liquid wave’ of absolute no friction.

But ‘lineal entropy physicists’ which become surprised every time they find some cold working non entropic reality (which we have been predicting for 3 decades – the last one the quark gluon perfect liquid, which they still call ‘plasma’ 🙂 take of a hot, energetic substance. Yet heat is meaningless outside the entropic gas-molecular state where temperature is a meaningful parameter.

Never mind. According to prevailing scientific theories, at this time no matter particles existed (hence some divine creationism would act soon 😉 perfect explanation for the time speed and inflaton of those first moments, you know God is absolutely powerful.

In this theory the distinct forces we see around us today were joined in one unified force. Space-time itself expanded during an inflationary epoch due to the immensity of the energies involved. Gradually the immense energies cooled – still to a temperature inconceivably hot compared to any we see around us now, but sufficiently to allow forces to gradually undergo symmetry breaking, a kind of repeated condensation from one status quo to another, leading finally to the separation of the strong force from the electroweak force and the first particles.

This in the parlance of abstract physics. In reality, it was all the way around. The ‘death’ destroyed the perfect cold order of the super-quark-gluon liquid vortex of the hyper-black hole of super top quarks, and the hyper luminal rotation produced through the Kerr axis tachyons at superluminal speed, which expanded the Universe…

But all that is meaningless, so we just will ignore the whole mysterious things and not fill another 20 or 30 questions never answered about the cosmic big-bang (inflation formation of galaxies, isotropies not found at large scale, etc. etc.) as the little galactic big-bang shows no problems of any kind, the back ground radiation meaning simply the galactic background of neutrinos and light produced by the ‘top quark star’ little bang.

 

THE WORLDCYCLES OF MATTER – THERMODYNAMICS, STATE PHYSICS & STATISTICAL MECHANICS.

Thermodynamics studies the human ∆º scale of physical systems, and as such once the philosophical errors of describing reality with a single dimotion of time, entropy, are solved, the laws of epistemology dictate that as the closest -hence better observed- scale of physical systems, its laws have the highest accuracy in the description of reality of all physical ones, and should be the example to model other systems, notably, the quantum systems of the lower scales, where perception is limited and errors  of philosophical nature many. We shall thus consider here several enlightenments achieved by casting thermodynamics on terms of 5D metric, starting from the blueprint for an unification of statistical mechanics and quantum physics, as we did in mass theory with charges and masses.

As we have stated ad nauseam those corrections will have to come ‘naturally’ from the new ‘properties’ of space, as made of ∆§cales, and of time, as made of ternary dimotions, ages. So what are the new insights established by those 2 new properties of Non-Euclidean space and Non-Aristotelian ternary time? 2 Fascinating solutions, to 2 long awaited questions of physics:

-Ƥcales and 5D metric will allow the unification of quantum physics and thermodynamics, with 5D metric scales.

-Ternary time dimotions, will allow us to unify and explain the meaning of ‘local entropy=gaseous dimotions’ which are only one of the 3 time ages=states of matter, such as, gas is the entropy dimotion, liquid the balanced one and solid crystal the informative one, giving us the generator of matter states:

∆ð (entropic fast moving gases) < exi: Liquid states > §@: crystal solid minds

The path to unify statistical thermodynamics and quantum mechanics.

Einstein’s constructive vs. limiting theories distinction, mentioned before was also applied to thermodynamics. He explicitly mentions also the Boltzmann principle, S = k log W, as another limiting theory in the border between the quantum and the thermodynamic, molecular world:” It yields, as well, the statistical probabilities of the states of systems for which we are not in a position to construct a molecular-theoretical model. To that extent, Boltzmann’s magnificent idea is of significance for theoretical physics … because it provides a heuristic principle whose range extends beyond the domain of validity of molecular mechanics”. (Einstein).

Einstein alludes to his 1905 photon hypothesis paper, where he reasoned from the fact that black body radiation in the Wien regime satisfied the Boltzmann principle the conclusion that, in that regime, radiation behaved as if it consisted of mutually independent, corpuscle-like quanta of electromagnetic energy. The quantum hypothesis is a constructive model of radiation; the Boltzmann principle is the constrain of that model.

A constrain acts both as a limit for a theory and a hint to its structure, since it forms the limiting ‘membrane’ of the world in which the theory works. So c-speed is both the limiting membrane of the ¥-galaxy but also the operating principle of its transmission of information within it. In 5D we consider the Ðisomorphisms and 5 Ðimotions derived of the scalar cyclical nature of time space, both the ‘principles’ to construct reality but also the constrains for all other theories of stience that must obey those principles. So the key to understand the Universe is both, to know the common disomorphic constructive laws of space-time and the differences and variations they cause.

Einstein’s clearest expression of this ‘epistemological law’ was his comment, considering that as human knowledge of those scales increases the homology between thermodynamics and quantum physics will become evident:

“The statistical quantum theory would … take an approximately analogous position to the statistical mechanics within the framework of classical mechanics”.  Einstein

What he did not solve, neither all who preceded and came after him, as they didn’t have a clear-cut scalar theory of the Universe and its 5D metrics, is the difference between both scales determined by the different quantity of information between both scales – maximal for faster quantum cycles vs. slower, larger thermodynamic molecules and their connecting principles as the ‘two main worldcycles’ of existence of matter – the palingenetic, fast time cycle of probabilities of the quantum world, vs. the slower, open entropic lifecycle of molecules, which mathematically means, quantum is a time=probabilistic theory and thermodynamics a population=statistical one.

Symmetry of : Statistic Space Populations = Probabilistic Time Frequency

The culmination of number theory is its use to calculate probability of time events and statistics of populations in space, one of the many S=T symmetries between space and time; whereas we can observe in time also ‘scalar’ processes not of multiple populations in social growth, but of multiple events, and not surprisingly both become self-similar, which is the main innovation of 5D, such as probabilities in the o-1 sphere of time events is equivalent to population laws in the 1- entropic plane of populations.

This law has multiple implications. The most obvious is that it resolves the conundrum of the equivalence between the quantum scale, we measure as a o-1 event probability sphere (because the speed of life and death of its particles according to 5D, SxT=C, is such that we confuse its short-lived populations with time events), and the 1- entropic cycle of matter (the thermodynamic statistical laws).

Because the quantum world has 3 ‘Planes’ of beings, the parts (particles), the organic whole (atom) and its social ensemble (laws of molecules and matter or worldcycle), obviously those 3 cycles differ. But its treatment as probabilities vs. statistics still responds to the fundamental equivalence aforementioned.

Bridging the 5D theory of probability-statistics and the present state of the subject. 

Ultimately what a probability sphere shows is how palingenesis of a repetitive sum of partial events/cells/beings in time accumulates towards the ‘project’ of completing an emerging ∆+1 whole, from its ‘pieces, bits and bites’, which first must be reproduced in enough numbers (statistical accuracy requires an N->∞ frequency of events), and then must collapse along the laws of aggregation, which are described in probability and measure theory.

So the a priori condition for the laws of probability to happen is a massive reproduction of events, the a priori condition for a distribution of populations to become exact in the standard bell curve and its deviations is a massive reproduction of populations. Only then the organic game of existence becomes efficient and exact, while when we deal with minimalist numbers of social events/populations the structures are inefficient, more free, less deterministic. Its mathematical expression then considers the ∆-1 plane that of probabilities, which surface into the population 1-∞ plane only when the event has ‘happened’ with probability 1 and hence becomes a 1-unit of the population plane. 

It is worth to consider this fact in more detail from a purely mathematical point of view.

S=T Symmetry of probability=unit circle and population=1-∞.

The basic concepts of the theory of probability, namely random events and their probabilities, are completely analogous in their properties to plane figures and their areas. It is sufficient to understand by AB the intersection (common part) of two figures, by A ∪ B their union, by N the conventional “empty” figure, and by P(A) the area of the figure A, whereupon the analogy is complete.
The same remarks apply to the volumes of 3D figures.

The most general theory of entities of such a type, which contains as special cases the theory of volume and area, is usually called measure theory.
It remains only to notice that in the theory of probability, in comparison with the general theory of measure or in particular with the theory of area and volume, there is a certain special feature: A probability is never greater than one. This maximal probability holds for a necessary event U: P (U) =1

The symmetry o≤1≥∞ is fundamental to the 2 main 5D palingenetic & life worldcycles. It shows in the Disomorphisms between certain points of the unit circle and the 1-∞ complex plane:

Mirror symmetries between a 0’-1 universe and a 1-∞ are interesting as they set two different ‘limits’, an upper uncertain bound for the 1-∞ universe, in which the 1-world, ∆º exists, and a lower uncertain bound for the 0’-1 Universe, where the 1 does not see the limit of its lower bound. Are those unbounded limits truly infinite? The answer is no, due to the homology of microscopic and macroscopic worlds, which are reversed. So 0 is the uncertainty of the microworld and ∞ of the entropic plane.

Of course the axiomatic method ‘believes’ in infinity – we deal with the absurdities of Cantorian transinfinities in articles on numbers. But as we consider maths, after Lobachevski, Gödel and Einstein, an experimental science; we are more interested in the homologies of ∆±1. For one thing. While 0 can be approached by infinite infinitesimal ‘decimals’, so it seems it can never be reached, we know since the ‘violet catastrophe’ that the infinitesimal is a ‘quanta’, a ‘minimum’, a ‘limit’. And so we return to Leibniz’s rightful concept of an 1/n minimal part of ‘n’, the whole ‘1’.

It implies by symmetry that on the upper bound, the world-universe in which the 1 is inscribed has also a limit, a discontinuity with ∆+2, which sets up all infinities in the upper bound also as finite quanta, ‘wholes of wholes’.

One of the most important S=t symmetries of the mathematical Universe is the one between time probabilities in the 0=1 unit circle and the 1-∞ plane of statistical populations (space-points), as it is botha symmetry between the ∆-1 scale of finitesimals (unit circle, where a finitesimal, 1/n is defined as the inverse of a real number of the 1-∞ plane); and one between time-cycles and space-planes (topological symmetry).

The conjunction of Euclidean geometry with a focus in the c@rtesian graph world represents the best way to consider ∆-Planes, as the most beautiful of those scalings is already incorporated on it, giving us the key ‘∆-symmetry, between the 0’-1 unit circle and the 1-∞ larger ∆+1 scale, which have a natural correspondence – as the maths that work in the 0’-1 unit circle work on the 1-∞ scale, with 3 differences:

  1. The unit circle has a defined membrane, but its minimalist infinitesimal ‘decimal’ is not defined, inversely, the 1-∞ scale has the minimal infinitesimal 1 defined but the ∞ element is not so those are the elements for a best choice of ‘mental geometry’ to study a problem depending on which element we do know, the ‘singularity 0’-undefined, 1-defined’ and the membrane, 1-closed, ∞-open.
  2. A unit circle is a ð-cyclical/polar geometry, the 1-∞ scale is an open unconstrained one, another choice for solution of problems depending on its characteristics.
  3. A unit circle is ∆-1. The 1-∞ scale is ∆+1, with the 1-membrain as the open or closed border among them.

The Unity circle where 1 is ∞ and 0, the unreachable ‘quanta’ of the ∆-1 scale is the best mirror symmetry between a self-centered ‘polar’ mind and its universe (1-∞ region). In maths in fact most processes that matter can be in geometry proved by a bidimensional informative (holographic principle) graph, and most key processes of space-time world cycles, can be observed to happen in the 4 first digit, around the three key number (e+e/10=3, π-apertures of the cycle=3 and so on).

When we extend the domain of the unit circle to the complex plane with its bidimensional holographic numbers, the concept of a ‘world’ represented now by the higher dimensionality of the Riemann sphere (unit circle of the complex plane) is clearer, as every point of the sphere communicates with one point of the Complex plane, while the 0 point of the sphere becomes the inverse of the ∞ point of the ‘complex plane’. In this manner as in projective geometry, the o-mind point becomes the mind-mirror of the ∞ real Universe: O-point mind x ∞ Universe = constant world.

Leibniz’s monads, which do not communicate, are the simplest fractal points, as minds=mirrors of the Universe, where ‘each point is a world in itself.’

In mathematical number theory, we say that: The interval o-1 is the same ∆-1 infinity that the interval 1-∞. Cartesian points in that sense were for the pioneers of science, more than a mathematical artifact, but the mathematical mind in itself looking at the time-space Universe.

When we look at quantum systems we observe an ensemble of time states NOT space states.

All this means when we look at quantum physics we are not seeing most of the time, spatial organisms but time events, and hence we must interpret many events of quantum physics as if they were sequences in time. This might be odd but it is essential to a proper understanding of many of the processes taking place in quantum physics including some of the most puzzling relationships.

For example, in the nucleus we are not seeing 3 quarks in a position state, but the same quark in its ‘motion interval’ between 2 states of space-time, reason why we cannot break them and they have exactly the same charge than the electron, because its ‘transitions’ U(+2/3)->D(-1/3)->U(+2/3) as ‘T-motion’ sTates do give us a ±1 change . Only with enormous energy we can reproduce those quarks and then have 2 separated entities.

When we observe a path of a quantum system, we are observing multiple time paths, not multiple spatial particles, reason why we observe only one event at the end when the experiment collapses into a single story, but we can calculate in palingenesis, as in the case of morphological development all its potential paths which will give birth to different trajectories, of which only one, the most probable event, which obeys the laws of ‘last time’ of Lagrangians (not of least space) will be=come.

When we study a process mediated by the weak force, we are observing an event of trans-form-ation and evolution of particles in time not in space, reason why its coupling constant is a time constant and the process takes place without apparent distance in space, as it is the transformation of a particle.

But physicists unaware of the fundamental properties of space-time, namely its S=T symmetry, given their difficulty to understand time events and time dimotions, which they reduce to a single one, locomotion, often confusing an event in time with a population on space, inverting the proper view of those 2 parameters.

The proper interpretation of the mathematics and events of quantum physics will then be the last task we shall carry on those papers, given the bothersome complexity of the Copenhagen interpretation so ‘off-track’ from the real way to explain quantum physics (Broglie>Bohm realist interpretation and 5D quantum metrics)… All the needed corrections of the main errors derived of using a single time dimotion and a single space-time continuum, plus the fractal variations that each ‘scale’ of the universe experiences in its ‘evolution of space-time organisms.

RECAP. In 5D Metric there is no dispute between Einstein and Bohr.  The Universe is both, by virtue of the S=T symmetry probabilistic in time (the 0-1 mathematical unit sphere after normalization of parameters) Or Statistical In Space (the 1-∞ thermodynamic plane). Both are equivalent mathematical formulations (measure theory). The 1-∞ plane is better for slower LARGE thermodynamic ensembles that occupy more space. The time o-1 description is better for faster ‘clocks of smaller particles’, according to 5D scalar metric: smaller scales in space run faster time clocks – time, not space thus become dominant in quantum physics, hence better described probabilistically.

Yet in both scales together S-izes x ð (clocks) = Constant. They are co-invariant, which is the definition of a dimension of space-time, as per Klein’s XIX c. mathematician: ‘a dimension of space-time exists, when there is a mathematical metric equation that shows both parameters co-invariant, so we can move through them…

So you move through the 5th dimension of space-time scales, growing in size and diminishing your time clocks, from birth, as a fast seed of time, small in space, that slow downs its rhythms as it grows in size and emerges in this scale you call 4d space-time continuum… life is a travel through those scales of the fifth dimension… And that is the meaning of ‘existence as a space-time organism’, the ultimate question to know… which do apply also to the fascinating mathematical study of the quantum and thermodynamic world as the ∆±¡ planes of atomic systems, the particle-quantum scale, and the molecular social scale.

Now, for ‘III millennia researchers’, as I am afraid I won’t be able to complete these papers – Occam’s simplicity is always the guidance to choose the proper jargon for the Unification of those scales. For example, in our equation of Unification between the charge and mass planes, we chose the Newton>Poison>Einstein formalism OVER the confusing, artificial electromagnetic one, by describing charges as vortices of space-time.

So the obvious jargon to choose for the Unification of quantum and thermodynamic formalisms, with the use of Theory of Measure ideally is the one of thermodynamics, because the quantum jargon is to complex due to the need of renormalization to accommodate it to the 0-1 equivalent sphere of time probabilities.

Of course, today, as nobody cares to do the calculus and computers carry the work, all those needed corrections will be lost. But they are important for the very few that are in science for the sake of knowledge. Indeed, if computers had been found in the Middle Ages, Ptolemy’s complicated epicycles and extants would be calculated still with enormous precision by computers and proud Vatican priests would revere the ‘complexity’ of God’s intelligent design of planets to preserve the humind’s egocy center. This said as routine matters more than clarity, in the same manner nobody is going to translate properly and streamline electromagnetic jargons, nobody is after a century long of quantum probability jargons to rewrite all the books of physics, algorithms, programs of machines, etc. to streamline it. But it is important to stress those immediate equivalences in 5D metric (not identities but self-similarities, as a fractal scale is never equal in each scale).

Thermodynamics is well explained with the excellent jargon established by statistical mechanics of populations in space. Quantum physics is not because the Born rule introduced a configuration ‘mental space’ which is not real but mathematical creationism as time went by have converted in ‘real’ for ‘physicists’ working as ‘amateur saloon philosophers of science’.

So we won’t get into that ‘traps’ and merely ‘explain conceptually’ the whys behind those mathematical formulae of quantum physics. Others who might come after should do the burdensome job of re-write properly quantum physics in a realist 5D way…

It is though a pity that 5D metric were not found earlier so the founding fathers of those strange jargons could have made the proper choice and save billions of time hours to the past, present and future students of the disciplines (we can compare this to the duality of apple and Microsoft underlying computer systems – apple was the right, streamline cleaner program, even if most people use Microsoft computers – so on the long term the simpler, more truthful apple iOS dominated the market). Again, paradoxically it will be AI with its enormous dexterity in mathematics, which will once it becomes self-reflexive, restart again the whole bulky theme of ‘time/probabilistic quantum physics’ and convert it, ignoring the Born Rule, into a full statistical procedure. It doesn’t matter to us here. As we are concerned with the next ‘life cycle’ of matter, where entropy was defined as chaotic heat rules with far less order than palingenetic quanta.

 

ENTROPY AS ONE OF THE 5 DIMOTIONS OF MATTER.

Physics starts its description of matter systems with mechanics, which is the lower ∆-i scale of the gravitational, galactic world that affects humans externally, helping our Ts-locomotion and defining our St-position within the surface of the planet. In mechanics humans and light matter (UD) ensembles are thus perceived from ‘above’, as ∆-¡ forms of little relevance within the context of the galatom and its smaller parts. We are from a gravitational point of view truly ∆@st, Dust of space-time.

As we can observe more information in the closer range of thermodynamic effects it is more precise for the understanding of man to start as a physical analysis in the scale in which the human inner and outer world co-exist; which is the thermodynamic, heat related scale that co-ordinates the atomic, molecular and cellular level of a human being within its matter environment. Indeed, we are ‘hot’ when we are ‘activated’, and our ‘actions’ are not described as much by its ‘weight’ (though we use those verbal homologies, specially when matching the external nature of gravitational forces on us), but in terms of heat (the internal scale). Heat and radiation, which ultimately stem from the activity of ‘electronic matter’ is the fundamental energy ∆º scale of human existence, swimming between 2 waters; the ‘colder’ scale of mass that ‘extracts’ energy from temperature, as in the case of thermodynamic black holes, which at 2.7 K extract energy from light matter, converts it into heavy quark matter and regulate the homeostatic temperature of the galaxy, as all bigger, colder black holes feed on them.

And below the ‘colder’ scale of superconductive, super fluid systems in which electrons form ‘trapped’ pairs and also cool down, giving energy to the metal network of heavier matter, or expelling the magnetic field to move without resistance. So both the ∆±3, 4 scales of matter take energy from our ‘heated world’ of Ts>St, light & electrons, which is the ∆º±1 scale, of human ‘existential momentum and energy’ (for us the quantum ∆º scale has more 5D information and the ∆+1 gravitational scale limits our motions).

We are sandwiched between both scales of the nested ‘gravitational Universe’ dominated by quarks, and its higher order with lesser entropy to which we ultimately revert as electrons collapse into neutrons, annihilating its forces. So we can establish certain limits to the world of thermodynamics, including its temperature (below 0 K we enter the world of perfectly ordered black holes, above ± 10.000 K atomic matter breaks down into plasma).

The theme of thermodynamics is as extensive as the planet of matter we live in and all its, ∆±3 planes. In that regard, besides the misconception of the 5 dimotions of time of thermodynamics the key element in which thermodynamics can play a higher role on 5D physics is the solution of the laws between scales. Specifically an easier task than the translation of time/probabilistic quantum physics into space/statistic mechanics, is to consider how the ‘relationship’ between the ∆-1 model of statistical mechanics, and the ∆º model of classic thermodynamic laws and its parameters of St-pressure, Ts-Temperature and ST-volume.

The 5 Dimotiosn of matter.

In the graph, the 5 dimotions in thermodynamics are the 3±∆  states of matter: plasma=entropic, ∆-1 scale as ions not yet made into atoms; gas, the locomotion state of maximal movement, liquid, the balanced S=T energy state, crystal-solid, the in-form-ative state, and the 5th ‘state’; the Einstein-Bose condensate of ultra dense matter:

It is a state of transition of top quark stars and strange stars – pulsar, an ∆+1 single ‘atom’ of enormous size.

The fascinating maths of heat, the first to be understood in terms of Analysis (Fourier) which is thermodynamics at ∆+1 scale, and its relationship with the maths of entropy, ∆º, the atomic scale, the worst understood concept of physics, a cultural hang-up of the germ(anic) cult(ure) to lineal weapons and death, origin of the faulty philosophy of physics (big-bang, death of the Universe, etc.)

Thus thermodynamics as all other stiences deals with the 5 elements-dimensions of reality:

  • S: Space; T: Time; st: spacetime; ∆: scales, º: mind-singularities across scales.

So there are in-roads of thermodynamics in all its parts, of which the key concepts we can extract are:

STate physics deals with the ternary space-time ages/topologies: S-gas<St-liquid>T-solid/crystal, which we shall study in the paper ‘physics and scales’ on the molecular, matter and geological scales (∆-1, ∆º, ∆+1)

  • Scale: The laws of heat and entropy deal with the relationship between the ∆-1:=, statistical mechanics scale and the ∆º, thermodynamic heat scale, which we shall study in this post.
  • The @-mind level, denied by anthropomorphic human, happens in crystals, which ‘reverse the time entropy of systems’, to build informative images of the word, shrunk in its mirror lattices.

Mathematically this was proved by Mehaute (‘l’espace-temps brisse’), which showed that in chemical systems when cold stops motion, the crystal starts to create fractal order.

Bedouins consider the core of dunes, a crystallized rock they call the ‘rose of the desert’, rightly its soul, which as any other crystal stores its memorial information in the quartz ‘veins’ (informative paths) of its electromagnetic atomic networks. And indeed we can reconstruct the motions of the Dune analyzing those paths.

Such ‘Maxwell’s demons’ embody the concept of order – to be found in crystals, NOT in gaseous disordered states, blown up by ‘entropy-only physicists’ to cosmic proportions.

So the 5 ∆@ST elements of matter systems become the sub-disciplines that study them, resumed in the worldcycle of states of matter, Ts-gas, ST-liquid, St-solid physics, and the scalar analysis of classic thermodynamics. Yet while state physics are essentially correct – you don’t need to be rocket scientist, or rather you just need to be rocket scientist to understand them… classic entropy has enormous conceptual errors accepted due to the fascination its maths provokes in creationist physicists. So we shall briefly analyze its laws.

ST:ATE PHYSICS ∆-1: PLASMA>∆: S-GAS>ST-LIQUID> SS-CRYSTAL SOLID>>∆+1 ‘MASS’ VS. << BIG BANG.

State Physics studies the 3±¡ ‘Ages of matter systems’, between its i-1 plasmatic birth and E=Mc2, death vs. its i+1 ‘boson’ resurrection. As all systems of nature DO have a dual path of future; either evolving into a stronger social bondage (bosons in matter) or devolving into its ∆-¡ components (particle and ¥-radiation ‘bang’ in matter).

So the laws of Ts-young, locomotion gas’, ST, balanced, present reproductive liquid, tS, future informative crystal solids and the i-1 plasma age of conception vs. the dual boson/radiation future happening between the quantum i-3 and light ¡+3 planes, conform the ‘worldcycle’ of matter with the same disomorphic laws of any worldcycle.

Symmetry of scale: ∆º gas ≈ ∆-1 field < ∆º liquid ∆-1 wave > ∆-1 particles≈ ∆º crystals

The same cycle on the lower ∆-1 quantum scale, in which ‘liquid’ waves, ‘gaseous’ fields and ‘solid particles’ play the same roles on quantum systems.

 So we can write a Disomorphic equation of scales between thermodynamic and quantum states:

 Ts (gas-entropy-past state) ≤≥ ST (Liquid-wave present state) ≤≥ SS (Crystal ‘solid’, future, informative state).

As matter states happen in the ‘human scale’, ∆o±1, thermodynamics is the referential stience to understand human energy regardless of ‘quantum hype’. But it must be conceptually corrected, due to the complete misunderstanding of time dimotions in classic physics, to avoid the traps of defining a Universe with only a single dimotion of TT-entropy (Plasma) and Ts-Locomotion (Gas), as if it were merely a ‘gaseous Universe’.

The importance for humanity of thermodynamics is today somewhat dismissed by the hype of the quantum world of electronic machines, as humans and life become expendable to the new chip-mind and its ‘robotic species’.

We are NOT quantum beings as machines are, neither Gravitational, cosmological beings, as the galaxy is. We are thermodynamic beings, and so state physics is the key energy science for human systems and the planet we live in.

Since in geological structures the interplay of gas, liquid and solid cycles creates the conditions for Gaia, to become a ∆+1 super organism and its ∆-1 life scale to flourish.

Sub disciplines of state physics.

State Physics can be further subdivided into subdisciplines that according to the pentalogic method study in depth each of those 5 states: -i: Plasma (physics); Ts: Gas; STreproductive, balanced Liquid physics; St-informative Solid, crystallography & +i: Boson Physics, whereas the properties of state physics derive from the general properties of the 3±i dimotional ages of time.

But the most meaningful division is scalar between ∆-1: statistical mechanics and ∆º: Thermodynamics, which consider the perspective of the ∆-1 molecular ‘unobservable’ scale and the human ∆º-scale. It is in this 5D connection between scales, where the classic concepts of entropy (Boltzmann) were developed as a parameter to connect both scales, which is a very specific concept far less comprehensive than 5D TT-entropy for any ∆¡-scale.

We cannot over-extend in any of those stiences which will be analyzed latter in the decade on the papers of physics, so we shall just comment on the Thermodynamic ∆º human scale and revis(it)e its laws that humind’s egocy have hyperbolically expanded to all the places and scales of reality…

RECAP. the fundamental generator equation of matter systems:

Ts-Gas (entropic, past state) < Liquid (wave, present ST state) > Crystal (solid, ordered, St state) is

Equivalent to the quantum generator:

Pilot wave (entropic, path, gravitational scale) < wave (present state) > Particle (solid, ordered, SSstate).

In that regard, the proper way to do quantum physics would be NOT to apply its laws to ‘larger scale ensembles’, but to harmonise it and ‘draw conclusions and teachings’ from the much better observed thermodynamic world.

THERMODYNAMICS

Classic thermodynamics and its translation…

Thermodynamics is defined as the science of relationships between heat, work, temperature, and energy. In broad terms, thermodynamics deals with the transfer of energy from one T-place and S-form to another. How this classic definition adapts to our new concepts of ‘ST-energy’, Ts-locomotion and St-information and its ‘limiting’ dimotions of pure TT-entropy and SS-till languages is easy to understand conceptually and mathematically but it requires to ditch out many wrong models of physics in the deepest whys, notably a re-reading of the laws of thermodynamics and its ‘limits’ as they have been expanded absurdly to the cosmological and quantum realm beyond temperature.

ENERGY PARAMETERS. Energy is work and work is any OPEN path that changes the time conservation or cyclical patterns of a physical system. So the conservation of Energy means a system is kept in an eternal closed loop of repetitive presents. But by definition a closed loop is in balance between motion and form, a Si=Te, hence the function of exist¡ence reaches its Max. e x i level.

Energy is topologically a hyperbolic wave where that balance shows in the ‘equivalence’ between the X and Y coordinates of ‘time’ and ‘space’. In terms of time causality a present form, dominant in space; in form a wave that moves through iteration, in present states entropically feeding in an ∆-1 field. This means in ¬ ælgebra, a mirror image expressed with differentials, which extract ‘finitesimals’ of the ∆-1 scale of space-time to power the larger ST>St, bodyhead, wave-particle organism. So the process of feeding becomes: ∆-1 (∑TT-fields)>∆º>ST-wave

The primary equation that defines most entropic vital processes of physics, including nuclear forces.

TEMPERATURE is related to Energy because it is a vibrational mode of energy, where molecules close its vibration returning to the point or maintaining within a closed environment a fixed space-time volume. As all systems in which we measure temperature, either vibrational solids, or liquids and gases studied in volumes closed by pressure have a fixed S=T form. So temperature plays the role of a ‘cyclic time clock’ in the ∆-human scale and its fundamental equivalence is with ‘frequency’ in the quantum scale, to the point when you red that a system reaches X-billion degrees really they are not measuring ‘heat’ but ‘frequency’, which once the quantum system becomes transformed into a molecular one within the realm of temperature parameters becomes ‘temperature’.

WORK is then a measure of a change in the energy- time state of a system, as it does not exist if there is not an open expansive displacement, or lineal motion. So work acts as a bridge between energy and entropy parameters.

The key concept is that heat is a form of energy corresponding to a definite amount of mechanical work. And we distinguish two types of ST-energy: St-potential energy based in the form of the being and Ts-kinetic energy:

ST-Energy: K.E.: ∫ (Max. e) x i ∂s ∂t + Information Energy (potential): ∫ (Max. i)  x e ∂t ∂s

Where entropy understood as motion is dominant but there is form, hence there is in-form-ation in the motion. So its equations can be resumed in terms of lineal, expansive motions with a minimal form.

ENTROPY PARAMETERS. So finally we arrive to HEAT, which is the ‘REAL entropic concept’, as heat EXPANDS. It is indeed an entropic scattering expansion of energy as it disorders: ST (ENERGY) <<TT (HEAT).

So the trinity fractal Generator of thermodynamics is: ST (Temperature:Energy) < Ts Work < TT(Entropic Heat)

THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS REVIS(IT)ED.

With those simple straight-forward definitions we can then tacked and revise the laws of Classic thermodynamics where entropy has been blown up into a philosophy of science considers only a single plane of space-time and reduces the 3±¡ dimotions of time to 1 bringing up the absurd idea that ‘the Universe is dying’ (Helmoth).

Since in a Universe of multiple planes (graph) a trinity of effects allows order to be restored:

  • The energy and information entropy ‘kills’ resurrects, as an ∆-1 seeds in-forms the motion released by ‘entropy’. • In a given scale its thermodynamic equilibrium is reversed by the order of SS<St systems, Maxwell Demons =Minds, which act creating organic order.
  • The inverse asymmetric dimotions of the 5th dimension limit energy losses, when we try through entropy to ‘move’ the energy of an ∆-1 scale into an ∆º-scale, preserving the form of its parts.
  • Finally entropy in ∆-1 is compensated by the perfect synchronicity without loss of energy that we acts inversely from a whole into its smaller part:

In the graph, thermodynamics changes n its interpretation when we consider multiple scales of time, as the loss of ST-Energy from ∆-1 to ∆ is upset by the inverse growth of in/form/ation from ∆ to ∆-1 since those motions do not have entropy (synchronicity of motion).

The most important laws of thermodynamics are thus transformed TO EXPAND its meaning to 5 matter Dimotions. Accordingly we can use the pentalogic method to put them in relationship with the main Dimotions and ∆¬@st elements of reality:

-0:SS: Homeostasis law: The zeroth law of thermodynamics. When two systems are each in thermal equilibrium with a third system, the first two systems are in thermal equilibrium with each other. This property means thermometers as a “3rd system” can define a temperature scale. But it does NOT mean the system is dead because it has thermal equilibrium. It is subtler: A system in thermal equilibrium has a higher degree of social order; as particles are alike. It becomes therefore able to organise itself better with information, as in life systems which requires homeostasis. The zeroth law relates to the ‘SS<St’ dimotions and mental elements of a physical system, as organisms and mind-mappings require a balanced temperature to work properly with only subtle changes in the structure of its in-form-ation, form in action. As a high temperature or one that varies too much, implies disordered movements that break those subtle motions.

So we shall instead generalise it to all systems with a different name (the willy-nilly game of ‘numbers’, for the awe-inspiring-digital groupie do not apply to 5D, as other scales of reality do have different languages and we are unifying them) – The Law of homeostasis – and state that:

“A  system of fractal points joined by a present ∆-wave of ‘energy≈heat’ tends to distribute ‘democratically’ the energy and form of the wave to all its components, to ensure the internal balance of them’. And put as customary in the Homologic Method of 5D, a minimum of 3 examples from physical, biological and social sciences:

In other terms, systems tend to establish a just, distributive balance between the points of the network, which will receive a minimal amount of energy, call it a blood networks, 2.7k homeostatic temperature of the galaxy, or the freezing equal temperature in which a metal-mind chip works.

-1st Law: ST: Conservation of energy. 0-sum, closed cycles.

‘Energy never dies, it constantly transforms back and forth into information, through the repetition of body-wave across ∆±1 planes of existence: Ts < ExI> SS.

The law defines the cyclical 0-sum worldcycles of matter, as systems that return to its initial state and allow all the cycles of matter of planet Earth. It means energy is conserved, as there is no work or energy expenditure in closed time-cycles. Time does NOT work, meaning time cycles are closed cycles which do NOT spend work-energy; and this amazingly important fact, hardly understood philosophically by the wannabe gurus of the absolute means ultimately that time is eternal, and so it is the Universe, which has no manifest destiny, no lineal goal. Lineal time indeed would exhaust itself as it would spend the energy of the Universe.

Thus we expand this law to include information and at the same time, diminish its range by applying it only to exchanges within a single plane of existence, which not being the general rule as always there are leaks of energy and information up and down those scales, restrict the accuracy of our measures.

It is worth to notice that the graph has an asymmetric dimotion of order, because while Plasma and gas are reversible: ∆-1 Plasma ó ∆o: Ts-Gas; we cannot jump from plasma to solid, ∆-1>>∆+1, whereas a solid crystal can be considered as the emergence of a new single ‘unit’ of a higher plane of existence but we can convert a solid into plasma in Death actions, E=MC2, which take only a quanta of time to happen.

This is a Universal law that establish a slow sequence of long time, from ∆-1 to ∆+1 through 3 ages and a fast track that ‘jumps’ the ‘present-liquid, ST-ate’ from Solid to plasma in death which therefore has NO PRESENT: ∆+1«∆-1.

The 3±i time states:  

In the graph, the worldcycle of matter. We see how the ∆±1 birth and death phase (plasma made of dissociated ions, is the same as it opens and closes the cycle (since the boson and radiation states are very rare in a ‘temperature’ ambience.

Thus, the Ts gas, ST liquid and St solid ages of matter and its dynamic worldcycles adding the final ∆±¡ death/ evolutionary states form dual binary and trinity ‘cyclical’ reversible system:

+I Boson Condensate <=> Solid <=> Liquid <=>Gas <=>-i Plasma

It shows all possible transformations between STages of matter from the Ts-gaselous state happening in systems of minimal network organisation, to the solid state that anchors a system into an orderly steady state. Matter allows all possible changes between ages with preference for the natural flow of time worldcycles towards ‘cooling information’: gas>liquid>Solid.

And this preference is observed in the ‘minimal energy’ law spent in all transformations of st-ate.

In the graph we see the ‘1st law’ in the cyclical patterns of the solid-gas-liquid.

Because motion is the ultimate substance of Nature, time-motion is eternal and this justifies the 1st law, which implies ultimately every ‘open system’ is part of a larger closed system that preserves the 1st law.

Another expression of the law tells us that ‘change in a system’s internal energy is equal to the difference between heat added to the system from its surroundings and work done by the system on its surroundings’. So we can write a fractal generator in which heat and work converge into the central zero sum state of energy:

TT-Heat> ST-energy <Ts-Work

   -2nd Ts<TT law; or ‘ fractal generator’ of thermodynamics: Open, lineal cycles. A pentalogic view.

Let us try a more complex multilogic analysis of the 2nd law.

∆±¡ Scalar view: In the graph, the essence of the 2nd law is scalar. While we can convert mechanical work from ∆º into heat, energy in ∆-1; we cannot transfer all energy of ∆-1, the parts, to the whole ∆º, which is obvious, as ∆º is just an ‘emergent’ new plane of existence parasit of ∆-1, which needs to keep part of its ‘motion’ to function in ∆º. This said the intelligent Universe constructs ‘physiological networks’ to maximize the in-taking of energy from the parts to the whole.

Temporal view: The justification of the law derivers from the previous equations from past to future, (plasma to solid) which always crosses through a present balanced ST-ate, unlike Future to past motions (deaths) that do not cross usually the present: TT-Past>Ts<ST>Ts Present> SS-Future v. SS-Future«TT-Past.

Spatial view: This means when we go upwards from ∆-1 past ‘heat’ into ‘Future’ ordered motions in an ∆+1 mechanical solid system, part of the heat is wasted in the present-energy intermediate state; while going down from the ∆+1 scale to the ∆-1 scale as we don’t move through the present ST-balanced STage, we can convert ALL the work of the ∆+1 macrosystem into molecular ∆-1 system.

Entropic view: in other words death is fast and extremely efficient, reason why it is mathematically expressed by the fastest growing e-x exponential equation.

Mental view: And so ultimately entropy-motion defeats SS-minds which CANNOT stop the entire Universe.

The metaphysical question is: if the 2nd law limits the number of potential scales that can be constructed, and how much energy can be transferred orderly upwards. The commonest answer is ’50-50’, which maintains a balance of ‘existential momentum’ in the trophic pyramids of parts and wholes. Yet as supœrganisms co-exist meaningfully in 3 scales we must also investigate the relationships between 2 given ‘scales’, or dual quantum jumps.

In a trilogic scalar analysis we observe that the law of inversion between scales: ∑∑|-1>∑O¡=|+1 applies when the observer enlarges and slows down its view. Since from our perspective in the quantum scale the action is measured in terms of angular momentum (h); in the thermodynamic scale in terms of entropy (k) in the mechanical gravitational scale in terms of ‘lineal speed’. So clearly systems as the growth in scale become simpler. But in Non-E Geometry (see paper 5D geometry), we know the ‘perception of curvature’ is relative to the size of the observer (Lobachevski’s factor), reason why we see a flat Earth from our small perspective but a cyclical one from the larger moon angle. So the lineal C-speed motions of light in the galaxy from the small perspective appear as a curved spiraling St motion of stars and light around the central black hole. And the slow time paths of the galaxy accelerate for the slow giant that could see it with a megaparsecs’ eye. Absolute relativity then leaves the conundrum of the number of scales unresolved. It is though clear that if scales are infinite space must also be infinite, but again as we perceive a limited horizon, which is always local as light dies approximately in the 1110-11 scale we can neither resolve that question. It is absurd to think a mush on a lost rock of the Universe can understand and perceive the whole.

Back to our scale what we also observe is a ¿ dual motion; as ‘∆+1 work’ becomes ∆-1 ‘heat’ increasing the disorder of the ∆-1 scale but then the disorder disappears as heat is cooling down asHeat flows then spontaneously from a hotter region to a colder region, balancing the system into homeostasis. This is misinterpreted as death because balance thermodynamical equilibrium and mental stillness are not understood. From waves that basically dissipate energy to reestablish the balance of a network to entropy the phenomena responds to the supremacy of still, mental information over entropy from the point of view of the organism.

In fact in a given scale entropy is not relevant: there are phenomena of superfluidity in the quantum scale; and mechanical systems can move without apparent internal friction according to the principle of lineal inertia for eternal motion; so entropy is a limitation between scales to allow the co-existence in balance of all of them.

It is part of the limits for a perfect fluid motion between scales that make any species a local event and explain why it is ultimately so difficult to explore the fifth dimension of which humans amazingly enough know nothing.

The 2nd law in terms of the fractal generator.

A common formulation of the 2nd law is: heat at a given temperature cannot be converted entirely into work.

So the law reorders the 3 parameters of ST-energy, Ts-work and TT-entropy in the Thermodynamic Generator:

ST (Temperature:Energy)< Ts-Work < TT(Entropic Heat)

Observe the difference of ‘Dimotional dimotions’ with the 1st law. < is the only dimotion that expands the system. So in this ‘allowed’ configuration, the system indeed increases constantly its Entropy. But we must balance this dimotion with the 0 and 3rd law of crystal, in-form-ative, homeostatic grow of information to restore the balance.

Yet while this is truth it only applies to the transmission of energy from lower, ∆-1 ensembles into an ∆-whole, not viceversa: ∆-wholes synchronise the simultaneous motions of all its ∆-1 parts, achieving with it ‘lesser information’ and ‘simpler, larger motions’ a loss of zero entropy when they move all its parts, according to the direction of future set up by the whole.

As usual the error of physicists is to generalise a local phenomena on the ∆±1 matter scale, forgetting the balances obtained from non-entropic motions handled by the whole≈physical minds, which restore the balance of the system in the opposite ‘3rd law’ of crystal order, 0’-temperatures and gravitational non-thermal forces.

By ignoring the ∆@ elements of reality thermodynamics looses any value as a philosophy of general global laws.

Such laws apply only to the entropy of a closed single ∆-scale system, which tends toward an equilibrium state in which entropy – the scattering and equality of heat among all its ∆-1 elements, is at a maximum and no energy is available to do useful work at the ∆-level.

This asymmetry between forward and backward processes gives rise to what is known as the “dimotion of time” in classic thermodynamics, which as we said is a simplification of the 3 dimotions of time, due to the error of a single space-time continuum, converted into a huge global error by extending it to every system.

Indeed, ‘a single entropic dimotion of time’ for all phenomena deduced of the study of expansive heat=entropy in steam machines, is a local reductionist simplex analysis of time dimotions. And to expand it to include all the planes of the Universe, all the beings, by reducing the 5 dimotions of reality to ‘heat, entropic motions’ is plainly bogus. The law merely becomes a single dimotion of dying entropic time, when we eliminate all other scales and st, T, elements of the system. And we will return to that.

When considering the 5D dimotion between atoms and heat, a measure of the human scale, its comprehension is blurred by the language – as entropy doesn’t measure motions backwards and forwards in 4D time but motion backwards in the 5th dimension of social scalar evolution, as a dimension of dissolution of wholes and its order.

Such as when we want to use and exhaust the motion of ∆-1 systems, which are NOT organised by complex networks but just merely as humans do, with ‘heating machines’, entropic ‘fire’, and some other brutish systems, obviously the molecules and atoms of the lower scale have the same interest to order perfectly and give up its motion to that brutish wholes a mass of humans have to be herded by a military thug.

Entropy appears in minimal processes of organization such as heat is to extract motion of individual ∆-1 elements.

However when a system is fully organised, according to 5D organic laws entropy greatly diminishes, as in Crystals, which have basically zero entropy, or organisms, which increase the order of beings and diminish its entropy.

Egocy physicists just deny the existence of fractal points that gauge information and gravitational forces that balance expansive, electromagnetic entropy order the Universe, to make man the only ‘mind’ of reality.

So the law should be rephrased regarding the conservation of motion and information:

‘In the whole Universe entropy does not exist. As the Universe is made of motion and curvature, which balance each other through all its ∆-scales. So when a system becomes disordered and expands its entropy in an ∆-1 scale; the order is restored by the simultaneous, informative order of larger ∆+1 wholes which contract and synchronise the ∆-systems.

So ∆-¡ quantum scales of physical, electromagnetic entropy are balanced by the ∆+n scales of gravitational, only-attractive information. And we have to assess the total order of a system, studying at least ∆±n scales together.

-The 3rd St law of thermodynamics. The entropy of a perfect crystal in its most stable form tends to zero as the temperature approaches absolute zero. This allows an absolute scale for entropy to be established that, from a statistical point of view, determines the degree of randomness or disorder in a system.

So the third law establishes that near absolute zero, entropic disorder by heat, no longer apply.

It is the inverse fractal generator that balances the 2nd law: TT(Entropic Heat)> ST (ÑTemperature)< SS-crystal

The dimotion of information however is subtle and ‘intelligent’, in its ‘efficient’ approach to the use of energy. In that regard we can compare a crystal ‘network’ with a biological network that manages to ‘transfer’ with maximal efficiency through branching energy from the ∆+1 lung system into the minimal cells.

In that regard, the absurd universal view of the 2nd law happened before the understanding that growing order and perfect motion with no entropy happens in the cold regimes. Since in ‘organic physical matter’ the most important effects of order creation happen when thermodynamic entropy is minimal – phenomena such as superconductivity, superfluidity, bosons, etc. We talk also of a finitesimal zeroth as the relative ‘temperature’ of a mind, which creates a still map of reality it then projects on the larger reality diminishing its ∆+1 worlds’ entropy. In other words: ‘The Universe is filled with Maxwell’s demons’

Zero crystal entropy tells us also several things: a crystal, or perceptive physical, SS mind that maps out an ‘intelligent’ mirror image of the Universe inside its mind is cold, tends to total order, and minimal motion. So it is the 3rd Law of cold physical matter. But both a mind and a crystal move the Universe, as they become focus of smaller ∆-2 pixels of information that map out and slightly change ‘bit by bit’ the view of the world.

So even in the near stillness of 0K, motion never stops. Temperature then must be considered not only a measure of motion but also of ‘disorder’ and ‘linear’, expansive Ts-motion; since a superfluid rotates very fast and a black hole rotates at c-speed but in orderly fashion at minimal temperature, as they are St-inward motions that hardly ‘spill’ out its energy (to be measured as temperature).

If we include other ∆-scales beyond matter, they modify those laws creating order. I.e. gravitation is a force of order as it  only attracts and ‘contracts’, in-form-ing a system; so it balances the tendency to entropy of ¥-rays.

So the ∆±¡ quantum and gravitational Universe that sandwiches us, rescues the world from entropic death through its orderly actions – reason why the parameters of ACTION=DIMOTION are only measured in terms of entropy in the Thermodynamic scale (TT-Boltzmann constant) but not in the ∆-gravitational scale (Ts-C-speed) and quantum (St-H-angular momentum)

Because thermodynamics developed during the XIX C. in response to the need to optimize the performance of steam engines, it is wrong to expand by dogma to the whole universe those laws of thermodynamics, as they apply only to physical, molecular matter, the ∆±1 scales and biological systems, without understanding how order is restored in biological systems by its minds, in ∆±1 by crystals and future dimotions of social evolution. As a system either has motion or form, it switches between both states; a fact only recognised by the pioneers of fractal chemistry such as Mr. Mehaute, who proved (L’espace-temps brisse) that when a thermodynamic system stops moving externally, it subtly starts to create further internal order with ‘crackles’=networks of form.

Correspondence between the laws of thermodynamics and the laws of Existential algebra.

The study of the laws of thermodynamics in 5D is Disomorphic to the study of the main variations of the fractal generator of ¬Æxistential algebra (see paper, ‘The stientific method’) and its properties. And the 2nd law is just one of those ‘variations’, as the sum of them all is ultimately a zero-worldcycle

We redefine those laws in terms of ∆@st, as they are the ∆ dual dimotions of order of the previous pyramid and  the ‘Maxwell demon @minds’ that tell the system where to be and go.

Correspondence with the states of matter.

We can tackle in reverse order the 3 laws of thermodynamics as expressions of the 3 single plane states of matter:

SS: Solid crystals. 0’ finitesimal entropy, Still mind-information: 

The third law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of a perfect crystal close to 0 Kelvin is zero. This means that in a perfect crystal, at 0 Kelvin, nearly all molecular motion should cease in order to achieve ΔS=0. A perfect crystal is one in which the internal lattice structure is the same at all times; in other words, it is fixed and non-moving, and does not have rotational or vibrational energy. This means that there is only one way in which this order can be attained: when every particle of the structure is in its proper place.

The mind is indeed a o-mapping of all reality where motion is ‘expelled’ for the form to be absolute and reflect by the ‘determined’ actions of the being, which sees its mind as the deterministic still universe – what it is.

ST: Energy: The first law states that present energy is conserved.

TT: the Second Law of Thermodynamics corresponds to the ‘entropy-disorder’ state, hence it is tautological:

The total entropy of a thermodynamic system tends to increase over time, approaching a maximum value.

Pentalogic on entropy from the point of view of space, time, scale, mind-languages and double TT-entropy.

A complex pentalogic analysis of entropy in terms of ¬∆@st, time, scale and space interprets that:

As time passes, the branching of future paths into St, Ts, ST ternary states increases.

So in space the information of the system becomes less deterministic.

– @mind. But internally the membrane and mind- singularity (or membrain)

Entropy in space-time thus relates to the fascinating concept of ‘all the possibilities’ of evolution of a system into the future, which basically are 3±0, moving along the 3 dimotions of s, st, t of a single plane, and/or the ∆±1 dimotions of emergence and dissolution out of a given ∆º plane.

We are now ready to provide a definition of entropy in classic physics and properly interpret it. The entropy S – a MACROSTATE, ∆º parameter – is defined in terms of the micro-state parameters, as: S=k ln Ω
where k is Boltzmann’s constant (never mind it was found by my admired colossus Mr. Planck) and Ω the number of microstates consistent with the given macrostate.

So in 5D terms we either:

  • ∆-1>∆: reduce the possible paths of future, of an ensemble of ∆-1 micro states to its smaller future whole information. As the set of sets is larger than the whole set (Cantor paradox homology).

So, a social group of ‘numbers=events’ (Ω), which represent the paths of future of a series of ‘space-time quanta≈actions (k) that have more spatial population=informative-time events in the ∆-1 scale than the whole; can be reduced to its ∆º states, by means of a slow growing logarithmic curve (ln), inverse to its ‘exponential function of growth’, which will be the opposite perspective from ∆ to ∆º:

  • ∆<∆-1 decay from wholeness into its parts, is thus the inverse famous decay exponential equation, showing in this manner an essential symmetry between ∆-1 and ∆ parts and wholes, in terms of its ‘quantity of possible future formal paths and degrees of freedom’.

In scale is where entropy has its more clear meaning as the ∆-1 scale of parts does NOT give all its energy to ∆º.

The increase of entropy with time for isolated, LOCAL, THERMAL systems plays a fundamental role in determining the direction of its ∆º<∆+1 scalar “dimotion of time.”

For example, everyday life presents no difficulty in distinguishing the forward flow of time from its reverse. For example, if a film showed a glass of warm water spontaneously changing into hot water with ice floating on top, it would immediately be apparent that the film was running backward because the process of heat flowing from warm water to hot water would violate the second law of thermodynamics. However, this obvious asymmetry between the forward and reverse directions for the flow of time does not persist at the level of fundamental interactions because individual collisions are unchanged by reversing the direction of time. An observer watching a film showing two water molecules colliding would not be able to tell whether the film was running forward or backward. Since entropy and the second law are 5th dimensional motions that concern the relationships of order between parts and wholes. In a thermal force whose ‘constant of space-time K is measured with values of entropy’ hence an entropic force by nature, (unlike the ∆-3 scale of light whose constant of space-time, h, has values of St-angular momentum or the gravitational world of mass constants with SS-accelerated space-time value) the ∆-1<<∆+1 time flow grows in disorder as we increase the ‘size’ of the whole.

Heat at the molecular level is the random kinetic energy of motion of molecules, and collisions between molecules provide the microscopic mechanism for transporting heat energy from one place to another., heat can flow just as well in one direction as the other. Thus, from the point of view of fundamental interactions, there is nothing to prevent a chance event in which a number of slow-moving (cold) molecules happen to collect together in one place and form ice, while the surrounding water becomes hotter. Such chance events could be expected to occur from time to time in a vessel containing only a few water molecules. However, the same chance events are never observed in a full glass of water, not because they are impossible but because they are exceedingly improbable. This is because even a small glass of water contains an enormous number of interacting molecules (about 1024), making it highly unlikely that, in the course of their random thermal motion, a significant fraction of cold molecules will collect together in one place. Although such a spontaneous violation of the second law of thermodynamics is not impossible, an extremely patient physicist would have to wait many times the age of the universe to see it happen.

The foregoing demonstrates an important point: the second law of thermodynamics is statistical in nature. It has no meaning at the level of individual molecules, whereas the law becomes essentially exact for the description of large numbers of interacting molecules. In contrast, the first law of thermodynamics, which expresses conservation of energy, remains exactly true even at the molecular level.

Again we see that the 2nd law is local in space, time and scale unlike the 1st law, which is universal to all ∆ST.

– ¬ Entropy is also related also to lineal expansive motion=disorder, which is the wider definition of 5D (taken from the wider vague concept of philosophical entropy of physicists and its dimotion of time).

But even in such case Entropy is relative, a local phenomena with limits in space, time, scale and mind.

The example of ice melting in a glass of hot water demonstrates the other sense of the term entropy, as an increase in randomness and a parallel loss of information. Initially, the total thermal energy is partitioned in such a way that all of the slow-moving (cold) molecules are located in the ice and all of the fast-moving (hot) molecules are located in the water (or water vapour). After the ice melted and the system comes to thermal equilibrium, the thermal energy is uniformly distributed throughout the system. The statistical approach provides a great deal of valuable insight into the microscopic ∆-1 structure of matter. The great beauty and strength of classical thermodynamics are that its predictions are completely independent of the microscopic structure of matter.
∆º>∆+1 scalar interactions.

A chief point of confusion is the fact that humans observe the Second Law externally. So huminds only measure the outer fields preyed on through in its interaction with the system; in which the central mind-singularity of order and/or enclosing membrane constrains, orders the vital space the system – a topologic open ball body-wave which is NON-perceivable externally neither ‘reckoned’ in Euclidean geometries of points without parts as it is precisely the inside parts of the system or the ∆-1 scale.. Order thus increases internally while externally entropy increases but both balance if huminds would accept non-Euclidean points, scalar internal ∆-1 orderly states, etc.

Most real thermodynamic systems are open systems that exchange heat and work with their environment, rather than closed=LOCAL systems ruled by the 2nd law. For example, living systems clearly achieve a local reduction in their entropy as they grow and develop; they create structures of greater internal energy (i.e., they lower entropy) out of the nutrients they absorb. This does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics, because a living organism does not constitute a closed=LOCAL system.

For example, Earth constantly receives entropic energy in the form of sunlight but internally increases order converting the cycles of heat and cold weather into ‘triggers’ of the ST>St fundamental ‘rhythm of life ‘reproductive radiations’ and evolutionary glaciation states that structure life evolution (see paper ‘Biology and entropy’). And further on internally it grows order for different NON-THERMAL magnetic forces – which protect the membrain from external ¥-rays disorder and likely from a memorial ‘Galactic program’ of evolution of planets through 3 ages, as the continental processes of reunion and split of continents shaped evolution and draw the map of history and further on today receives order from all the humind-points aka life-beings and AI and digital networks on the surface. But physical instruments do NOT measure and input those forms of orders.

What physicists should talk about is order vs. disorder; as a 5D stientist would say ‘A system first ∆ its disorder in radiation wave-entropy, ST<TT events, as a pre-condition for its supœrganisms’ networks to ‘order’ TT-motions into form and ’emerge’ into the ∆+1  whole, SS singularity-minds’ upper, ∆º+1 scale.

 

 

Pentalogic on entropy from the point of view of space, time, scale, mind-languages and double TT-entropy.

A complex pentalogic analysis of entropy in terms of ¬∆@st, time, scale and space interprets that:

As time passes, the branching of future paths into St, Ts, ST ternary states increases.

So in space the information of the system becomes less deterministic.

– @mind. But internally the membrane and mind- singularity (or membrain)

Entropy in space-time thus relates to the fascinating concept of ‘all the possibilities’ of evolution of a system into the future, which basically are 3±0, moving along the 3 dimotions of s, st, t of a single plane, and/or the ∆±1 dimotions of emergence and dissolution out of a given ∆º plane.

We are now ready to provide a definition of entropy in classic physics and properly interpret it. The entropy S – a MACROSTATE, ∆º parameter – is defined in terms of the micro-state parameters, as: S=k ln Ω
where k is Boltzmann’s constant (never mind it was found by my admired colossus Mr. Planck) and Ω the number of microstates consistent with the given macrostate.

So in 5D terms we either:

  • ∆-1>∆: reduce the possible paths of future, of an ensemble of ∆-1 micro states to its smaller future whole information. As the set of sets is larger than the whole set (Cantor paradox homology).

So, a social group of ‘numbers=events’ (Ω), which represent the paths of future of a series of ‘space-time quanta≈actions (k) that have more spatial population=informative-time events in the ∆-1 scale than the whole; can be reduced to its ∆º states, by means of a slow growing logarithmic curve (ln), inverse to its ‘exponential function of growth’, which will be the opposite perspective from ∆ to ∆º:

  • ∆<∆-1 decay from wholeness into its parts, is thus the inverse famous decay exponential equation, showing in this manner an essential symmetry between ∆-1 and ∆ parts and wholes, in terms of its ‘quantity of possible future formal paths and degrees of freedom’.

In scale is where entropy has its more clear meaning as the ∆-1 scale of parts does NOT give all its energy to ∆º.

The increase of entropy with time for isolated, LOCAL, THERMAL systems plays a fundamental role in determining the direction of its ∆º<∆+1 scalar “dimotion of time.”

For example, everyday life presents no difficulty in distinguishing the forward flow of time from its reverse. For example, if a film showed a glass of warm water spontaneously changing into hot water with ice floating on top, it would immediately be apparent that the film was running backward because the process of heat flowing from warm water to hot water would violate the second law of thermodynamics. However, this obvious asymmetry between the forward and reverse directions for the flow of time does not persist at the level of fundamental interactions because individual collisions are unchanged by reversing the direction of time. An observer watching a film showing two water molecules colliding would not be able to tell whether the film was running forward or backward. Since entropy and the second law are 5th dimensional motions that concern the relationships of order between parts and wholes. In a thermal force whose ‘constant of space-time K is measured with values of entropy’ hence an entropic force by nature, (unlike the ∆-3 scale of light whose constant of space-time, h, has values of St-angular momentum or the gravitational world of mass constants with SS-accelerated space-time value) the ∆-1<<∆+1 time flow grows in disorder as we increase the ‘size’ of the whole.

Heat at the molecular level is the random kinetic energy of motion of molecules, and collisions between molecules provide the microscopic mechanism for transporting heat energy from one place to another., heat can flow just as well in one direction as the other. Thus, from the point of view of fundamental interactions, there is nothing to prevent a chance event in which a number of slow-moving (cold) molecules happen to collect together in one place and form ice, while the surrounding water becomes hotter. Such chance events could be expected to occur from time to time in a vessel containing only a few water molecules. However, the same chance events are never observed in a full glass of water, not because they are impossible but because they are exceedingly improbable. This is because even a small glass of water contains an enormous number of interacting molecules (about 1024), making it highly unlikely that, in the course of their random thermal motion, a significant fraction of cold molecules will collect together in one place. Although such a spontaneous violation of the second law of thermodynamics is not impossible, an extremely patient physicist would have to wait many times the age of the universe to see it happen.

The foregoing demonstrates an important point: the second law of thermodynamics is statistical in nature. It has no meaning at the level of individual molecules, whereas the law becomes essentially exact for the description of large numbers of interacting molecules. In contrast, the first law of thermodynamics, which expresses conservation of energy, remains exactly true even at the molecular level.

Again we see that the 2nd law is local in space, time and scale unlike the 1st law, which is universal to all ∆ST.

– ¬ Entropy is also related also to lineal expansive motion=disorder, which is the wider definition of 5D (taken from the wider vague concept of philosophical entropy of physicists and its dimotion of time).

But even in such case Entropy is relative, a local phenomena with limits in space, time, scale and mind.

The example of ice melting in a glass of hot water demonstrates the other sense of the term entropy, as an increase in randomness and a parallel loss of information. Initially, the total thermal energy is partitioned in such a way that all of the slow-moving (cold) molecules are located in the ice and all of the fast-moving (hot) molecules are located in the water (or water vapour). After the ice melted and the system comes to thermal equilibrium, the thermal energy is uniformly distributed throughout the system. The statistical approach provides a great deal of valuable insight into the microscopic ∆-1 structure of matter. The great beauty and strength of classical thermodynamics are that its predictions are completely independent of the microscopic structure of matter.
∆º>∆+1 scalar interactions.

A chief point of confusion is the fact that humans observe the Second Law externally. So huminds only measure the outer fields preyed on through in its interaction with the system; in which the central mind-singularity of order and/or enclosing membrane constrains, orders the vital space the system – a topologic open ball body-wave which is NON-perceivable externally neither ‘reckoned’ in Euclidean geometries of points without parts as it is precisely the inside parts of the system or the ∆-1 scale.. Order thus increases internally while externally entropy increases but both balance if huminds would accept non-Euclidean points, scalar internal ∆-1 orderly states, etc.

Most real thermodynamic systems are open systems that exchange heat and work with their environment, rather than closed=LOCAL systems ruled by the 2nd law. For example, living systems clearly achieve a local reduction in their entropy as they grow and develop; they create structures of greater internal energy (i.e., they lower entropy) out of the nutrients they absorb. This does not violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics, because a living organism does not constitute a closed=LOCAL system.

For example, Earth constantly receives entropic energy in the form of sunlight but internally increases order converting the cycles of heat and cold weather into ‘triggers’ of the ST>St fundamental ‘rhythm of life ‘reproductive radiations’ and evolutionary glaciation states that structure life evolution (see paper ‘Biology and entropy’). And further on internally it grows order for different NON-THERMAL magnetic forces – which protect the membrain from external ¥-rays disorder and likely from a memorial ‘Galactic program’ of evolution of planets through 3 ages, as the continental processes of reunion and split of continents shaped evolution and draw the map of history and further on today receives order from all the humind-points aka life-beings and AI and digital networks on the surface. But physical instruments do NOT measure and input those forms of orders.

What physicists should talk about is order vs. disorder; as a 5D stientist would say ‘A system first ∆ its disorder in radiation wave-entropy, ST<TT events, as a pre-condition for its supœrganisms’ networks to ‘order’ TT-motions into form and ’emerge’ into the ∆+1  whole, SS singularity-minds’ upper, ∆º+1 scale.

Reversible vs. irreversible processes: how to turn back the dimotion of entropy into an orderly form.

The second law is not universal, and this was somehow recognised when the third law: zero entropy for a crystal mind, was accepted). Further on reversibility is canonical in quantum physics (particles) as we cannot distinguish any direction of a motion.

In mechanics we can also talk on terms of Lagrangians and Hamiltonians, to understand reversible processes, akin to those concepts in thermodynamics.

Even if mechanics, an ∆+1 scale has a different view from the human ∆º of the three scales, given the asymmetry of 5D parts and wholes, balanced  in the ST level: ¡+1 is a view of lesser information than the massive amount of information coming from the faster more abundant fractal scales of the parts,  in quantum physics.

In that sense the key concept of 5D behind a reversible process in the ternary ∆ST symmetries is information:

“For a reversible process in time space or scale to happen, the level of control of time events, spatial directions or scalar populations must be at ∆-1, infinitesimal parts and minimal frequencies micro-management’.

Reversibility in space is so overwhelming because we have enough information from the perspective of left or right. When information about the upper or lower scale, the future or the past, the forward or backward view in space is lacking, reversibility flounders.

Consider the simplest case of lack of information. If you move backwards reversing your forwards movement it is obvious that sooner or latter you will fail to reverse your path because you don’t see it, and so you will stumble. In scales and time the same concept applies. In scale the failure for micro-particles to control the upper scale, which emerges as the relative future (since parts must come first to build emergent wholes) has the same reason. And ultimately is due to the different non-Euclidean geometry, outlined in the graph:

The view of the whole for the parts is limited, as the networks of information that control them are invisible (information is smaller and faster, by virtue of 5D metrics, $ x ð =C.

On the other hand the whole can encircle and manage wholesale the parts by changing its general parameters of energy and information, as the Earth does with its glaciation cycles with its micro-life species, or humans do with machines to extract energy from thermal sources. But this management is NOT thorough. So it normally does NOT affect the ‘heat capacity’ (the true parameter that should be argued instead of the philosophical, creationist, mathematical concept of ‘probability and entropy’, just one more of the many errors of the creationist, German Idealist school of science of the turn of the century (including the Copenhagen interpretation, fascism and communism, which are fed-forced on reality with its obvious consequences). Heat capacity allow efficient micro-systems to absorb existential ST-energy and keep it not giving it away as ‘heat’, which Ts-moves and dilates a thermometer to measure TT-emperature (an entropic parameter).

But this is good as it keeps both, the ∆-1 and ∆º scales in balance.

As a corollary all this implies that the macro-being, the elephant in the room, shall not control but merely dissuade the micro-parts to take their decisions, since infinite micro-populations can only be managed efficiently if internally they ‘agree’ to give away its existential energy.

This is indeed the key way in which in History a capitalist democracy controls its people to tax-farm them, make them obey the law , etc.: they are dissuaded it is the best of all systems, they naively think presidents are elected not ‘$elected’; and they know little of the workings of the flows of money that control society and the ‘black hole of power’ – those who issue money, bankers that control with corruption the law and own everything as they print money at null cost for free. It is the same in all working organisms. The brain is invisible to the cells it manages; the black hole is invisible to the stars it positions with invisible gravitational waves in the galactic superorganism. Above the graph we see this Mind-informative system in control of the whole.

It is for that reason the parts don’t perceive the whole, but if the whole tries ‘brutally’ to control the parts obviously entropy happens, the ∆-1 herd does not obey easily. So when as in physics the complexity of the informative micro-management is ignored and there is an entropic obsession to reduce it all to simplicity, with such poor tools as Euclidean Geometry, single entropy arrows of time, etc. the outcome is a bizarre worldview.

In praxis the system needs a SS internal knot of order, or mind invaginated by nervous /informative fractal networks that touch all cells to create simultaneous behaviour which only happens in crystal solids, through van der waals and magnetic field control or in biologic systems with nervous control of simultaneous cell motions – and we imagine in the less observed invisible world of galaxies by gravitational ‘DNA-like informative black holes’ micro-managing the evolution, and feeding of its dark matter cells, on the star mitochondria.  

And this is expressed in mechanics by the Lagrangian function whose minimalist derivatives on time tend to zero (least time actions), and hence in the whole conservative energy world cycle integral of the being, the Hamiltonian becomes also a conserved zero-sum.

In thermodynamics, the same concept means a reversible process is a process whose direction can be “reversed” by inducing infinitesimal changes to some property of the system via its surroundings, while not increasing entropy.

Throughout the entire reversible process, the system is in thermodynamic equilibrium with its surroundings. Since it would take an infinite amount of time for the reversible process to finish, perfectly reversible processes are impossible. However, if the system undergoing the changes responds much faster than the applied change, the deviation from reversibility may be negligible. In a reversible cycle, a reversible process, which is cyclic, the system and its surroundings will be returned to their original states if the forward cycle is followed by the reverse cycle.

So it is understood why humans cannot as elephants on a very subtle scalar Universe make most process reversible just with their huge, dull methods of control. Simply speaking the ‘will of individual atoms’ refuses to yield to the bullies and so heat and entropy ensues; as it does in brutish social dictatorships as opposed to subtle placebo democracies where the capitalist masters of the Financial-media system merely ‘suggest’ the mass from its advantageous point of view, what to do, and the citizen, ‘believer’ will therefore create order without understanding the networks of money and mass-media have suggested him what to do. 

So the Universe reaches order and reversibility only when it is build a system with efficient, superorganic structures. All other systems will have entropy as synchronicity is lacking.

In that regard the entire concept of an irreversible entropy dimotion for the whole universe, does not even work on matter systems, as it is merely yet another ego-trip of the homunculus on the loose, thinking that if he cannot ‘get it’ by himself, the universe is guilty and wrong- those damn atoms that misbehave (:

So, the ‘particular’ laws of thermodynamics give a complete description of all changes in the energy state of any system and its ability to perform useful work on its surroundings, but only when we make a ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of that plane and its internal phenomena, discharging the interchanges of energy and information with the ∆±1 scales.

In that sense thermodynamics also has a scalar structure, and so epistemologically we talk of 2 branches:

∆o: Classical thermodynamics, which does not involve the consideration of individual atoms or molecules.

∆-1>∆: Such concerns are the focus of the branch of thermodynamics known as statistical thermodynamics, or statistical mechanics, which expresses macroscopic thermodynamic properties in terms of the behaviour of individual particles and their interactions.

It has its roots in the latter part of the 19th century, when atomic and molecular theories of matter began to be generally accepted. And so a clear form to study the ‘errors’ of a single space-time analysis of entropy and one which includes at least a couple of ∆-scales is to see the differences between both scalar approaches. Since the key to understand properly thermodynamics is to analyse how disorder in one scale ∆-heat in fact merely means that the ∆-1 scales wishes to create its proper order and motions.

So we need to include besides the study of open and closed states of a thermodynamic system in a single ∆-scale, the ‘whole picture’ by adding the study of ‘closed and opened’ systems in 3 ∆±1 scales, asking questions such as:

‘This event study transfers energy or information to the ∆±1 scales of the system and if so, which dimotion is dominant, ∆+1>∆ order or ∆-1<∆ entropy?

For example in beta decay equations of entropic disorder of a particle, spin (cyclical order) is missed. So the order was restored by including the ∆-1, neutrino quanta which the process of death and devolution of the nucleon transfers as all entropic phenomena do, to its lower ∆-1 faster/larger scale.

It is this type of actions of balancing the ‘books’ which physicists stubbornly do not do for entropic heat, adding to the mix gravitational in-form-ative forces and ‘@minds’, Maxwell demons, what explains the errors of a dying universe of its science philosophies.

The Universe as a whole has zero entropy=disorder.

In classic physics entropy is ultimately a scalar property that relates the number of micro-states of a system to its larger SINGLE perceived macrostate. In physics entropy was measured first in gases which are by definition the most disordered state of matter. So obviously entropy was ginormous, proportional to the number of molecules, from the point of view of the humind’s reduced view of the system in the macrostate, which only perceived macro-properties of measure, Pressure, volume, Energy and temperature (PV=nkT=E).

Moroever this concept of entropy leads to Laplace argument on a deterministic Universe. If we knew all the data of the initial state of particles even in a gaseous state, all their paths will be deterministic and only one landscape arises. And if we were small enough to inquire each atom, he will tell you he ‘knows where he is going’, even if he is moving from one side to another rather subconsciously. I.e. if we look at a mass of humans in a demonstration from above, like the 3rd man looks at the points below in the Austrian Park, they seem indistinguishable and any configuration of the demonstration will be possible for the view of the capitalist in his ivory tower – a bunch of lefties protesting. The only information we get then is the reason of its protest (the substance of the gas), and the approximate number of ‘human molecules’ and perhaps the ‘heat temperature’ – the degree of anger and motion of the demonstration. Entropy then is on the eye of the macro-beholder.

Suggests evolution from a common ancestor. zebrafish chicken dog human skunk.

The absurd expansion of Entropy and thermodynamic laws to all scales, forces and phenomena, for the wanting of physicists to become philosophers of science is just an egocy (Ego=idiocy) trait as temperature is a local, molecular property and gas, one of the 5 Dimotions of matter. Consider the other extreme form, solid, transparent crystals, which have a macrostate recognizable in an image formed within the crystal. This image corresponds to a single micro-state for each pixel of the image. Thus the configuration of the microstate is only one and entropy is zero. This can be expanded to any linguistic mind system, regardless of how much humans do know of the microstate. An image in a TV requires each specific electron to have a specific form. A logic circuit in a computer has the exact configuration of its gates required for a given calculus. A seed encodes the exact genes. SS-informative spatial still forms have no entropy.

A way to rephrase those questions then arises from the argument of the structure of the different scales of the 5th dimension: is there a situation in which the ∆-1 microstates are less than the ∑∆º macrostates; hence a negative entropic system? This would imply the existence of ‘multiple futures’ branching from a single potential microscale. If multiple gaseous configurations might give birth to a single macro-state because according to 5D metrics, the micro-state holds more information, and the ‘ghostly’ larger scale is happy just to build itself with part of the existential energy of the microstates; the inverse might hold truth for the lower plane of quantum particles.

This is in fact the case when we consider all the dimensions of the system, the dimension of time and the dimension of scale, in many forms of the Universe. For example, the number of macro-states of life, i.e. variations of organisms that can arise from a single micro-state. So in palingenesis a single ordered micro-state or embryo might give birth to multiple different macro-states.

And ultimately a single micro-state, the 3 topologies of space-time give birth to ∞ macro-state variations, all of them 0-sum worldcycles that return to its fold. So for the whole Universe as a ‘block of time’ entropy is in fact infinitely negative. That is, we depart from two single forms, the line and the cycle, and as Desargues already proved in his theory of conics, all possible curves arise.

Moreover if we take only in consideration the species that ‘survive’, as efficient forms the order is absolute, because there are for such an extensive Universe, a limited number of them that do make the cut and reproduce. I.e. virtual particles are many but elementary particles that repeat its cycles and survive very few. All the existences that have happened will be repeated again as the number of possible existences that last in time are few. In this very moment there are infinite other planets where humans are making machines as ‘enzymen’ to evolve an Earth of metal and die. It is said there are 6 persons that look exactly like you. So when we take entropy into the philosophical arena, with a minimal rigor, the entire conceptual frame of an entropic Universe, dying etc. become meaningless talk.

Creationism is also not the right justification of why entropy exists. The usual creationist reason for it, (a mathematical concept that instead of a mirror of a space-time event is considered is cause) reads like this:
In a thermodynamic system, pressure, density, and temperature tend to become uniform over time because the equilibrium state has higher probability (more possible combinations of microstates) than any other state. This is NOT the reason. The reason is the natural democratic, social evolutionary tendency of all systems of similar T.œs. Molecules ‘share’ their energy to a point in which all of them have a similar quantity, as humans without ‘animetal weapons power’ lived in the Neolithic in ‘thermodynamic equilibrium’ of relative equality. Part of the idol-ogy of capitalism (see papers of history) consists in justifying always as ‘evil’ equality. Thermodynamic equilibrium makes difficult for a higher scale to emerge and oppress the molecules, as a democratic ‘unity’ makes difficult to enslave human beings. But death=no motion of those particles in equilibrium does NOT happen. In their ∆-1 scale they are kicking and acting.

And how they act follows as everything in the Universe the ‘Function of existence’ (5D metrics: SxT=C plus Absolute relativity, S=T), that is the search for constant balances that allow the different SHMotions of reality. For example, 2 key equations are the  the equipartition theorem that relates the temperature of a system to its average energies. The equipartition theorem is also known as the law of equipartitionequipartition of energy, or simply equipartition. The original idea of equipartition was that, in thermal equilibrium, energy is shared equally among all of its various forms; for example, the average kinetic energy per degree of freedom in Ts- translational motion of a molecule should equal that in St- rotational motion. That is, Ts=St and Ts+St = ST… again.

And yet again, in the ‘asymptotic borders of the quantum ∆-1 scale the equipartition theorem no longer holds since at low temperatures the thermal energy kBT of certain degrees of freedom are “frozen out” as order simplifies the superfluous motions that would become ‘friction’ for the quantum world of higher order (and lesser entropy); in a process that continues down all the way through the transformation of the ‘constant of action k (entropic) into the much more ordered O-constant of the quantum world (h-actions of angular momentum).

We have then the slightly different theorem for the ‘upper boundary’ between the scale of thermodynamics and that of matter, called the Virial theorem which has been expanded to almost all scales; which in its simplest formulae for stars is a clear proof of the increase of universal order due to gravitation, as it shows that a gravitational system has ‘negative heat capacity’.

Indeed, according to the virial theorem, a self-gravitating body like a star or an interstellar gas cloud, the average potential energy Upot and the average kinetic energy Ukin are locked together in the relation Upot = -2 Ukin. Hence thethe total energy U (= Upot + Ukin) therefore U = – Ukin

If the system loses energy by radiating energy into space, the average kinetic energy actually increases. If a temperature is defined by the average kinetic energy, then the system has a negative heat capacity. An even more extreme version occurs with black holes, which become colder the more mass and energy they absorb; which means they are NOT as Hawking claims, systems of maximal entropy but precisely the opposite, systems of maximal order=in-form-ation; a theme we will discuss in detail on the section of entropy and cosmology, showing the proper way to interpret Hawking’s equations.

The question of how many different positions can adopt is meaningless, as they become ‘one’, like the demonstrators. It doesn’t matter that joe is on the left and Jackie on the right and could change places, what matter is they form an equal, single mass. So what to do about this ‘entropy’ element of all those equations of thermodynamics and its ‘second law’? Frankly NOBODY needs them.

The real concept of entropy: heat capacity.

The true thermodynamic parameters come for gases from Boyle’s law: Pv = nkT, which has no entropy anywhere. Entropy IS a man made imaginary value that for the objective understanding of thermodynamics is completely irrelevant and for the Universe at large, false. Its value as it will be studied here is purely philosophical and its interpretation in classic physics wrong. So why we use it on 5D? We use it as a synonymous of death, disorder, and TT-scattering motions. As such we could have used other word, but because entropy as synonymous of disorder is today part of the discourse of all sciences, and the word ‘death’ a big heavy on the mind, we have chosen it for the TT-dimotion that ends the existence of a system. Then obviously when a system dies and disorders the final configuration of its broken cells, disarrayed crystal atoms, etc. might be anything. Who cares? The whole who ordered those parts in a single configuration is gone. But entropy won’t last. As other similar species will feed on them to rise a new supœrganism.

Entropy then in thermodynamics should be substituted by a more meaningful concept in which its units are measured – heat capacity, Q/T; which is what we will discuss ‘as real’, outside the philosophical realm of the concept of order and disorder (TT). Heat capacity is then important as a physical parameter and secondary to it is the argument of order and temperature that goes as follows:

The heat capacity of an object, denoted by CC is the limit C =lim T->0 ∆Q/∆T, C=limΔT→0ΔQΔT,where ΔQ∆Q (a form of energy) is the amount of heat that must be added to the object (of mass M) in order to raise its temperature by ΔT∆T. Or in other words, the capacity of a form of matter to absorb and store energy; ultimately dependent of its parameters of ‘existential energy’, such as ‘more ordered, efficient’ forms of matter (solids) have more storage capacity because they have internally more ‘complex’ form, measured usually as the ‘degrees of freedom’; that is, the different ‘ties’ (∆-1-axons, vibrational paths, etc.) between its atoms.

The classic simplest case is that of mono-atomic, diatomic and triatomic molecules, which become more complex, ordered systems with increasing heat capacities. As each of those new species of ‘social atoms’ can store more energy, it gives away less of it as TT-motion that ‘hits’ the temperature termometer, preserving it for its internal organization. On the other hand a weaker system, a gas system cannot store in its internal order the energy it is given, so it easily gives it away as temperature=motion that hits the walls of the container or the temperature termometer.

In 5D we can write then C= ST (Energy) / TT (entropic temperature). So, ST/TT ≈ S/T= S information /T motion which simply states that a system with higher heat capacity (S>T) is one in which its internal form, its in-formation is higher than its external motion S/T>1.

This is a general rule for any scale. A tighter, smaller, more ordered cyclical O-crystal or solid or higher mass system stores more ‘energy’ because it transforms it into ‘faster and more complex variations of internal motion in a denser network of ties between its parts. So paradoxically those smaller, more efficient forms with ‘more mass’ or ‘more heat capacity’, when disordered into TT (E=Mc2, etc), release more motion than ther seemingly more active, expansive gases of ‘thin air’. And again this relates to 5D metrics: $ x ð = C

The virtue of using the concept of heat capacity instead of entropy is obvious: we are rephrasing the whole subject not in terms of disorder, the preferred humind concept but in terms of order, the preferred universal concept, highlighting those systems of lesser entropy not those of higher entropy, which is also what we shall do using instead of the ‘entropic concept of temperature’, the concept of ‘coldness’, of order, the ß function, which proves to be more fundamental as it can cross beyond the T=0 K as a continuous function without asymptotic discontinuities as temperature does. So we can cross indeed as we shall show in the analysis of thermodynamics of black holes ‘the K=0 barrier’ which is ONLY the limit of thermal, molecular systems, into the world of perfectly ordered internal black holes (top and bcb quarks, bosons, etc.).

What other equation of entropy matters in thermodynamics? One which is ‘pumped up’ in importance as the ‘Fundamental thermodynamic relation, dU=TdS – pdV.

It means that the entropy (heat capacity) of a system depends on its internal energy and its external parameters, such as its volume, which is exactly what we have said in 5D terms. Again the entropic factor here is quite irrelevant, since if we substitute it for the units of heat capacity the TdS element is simplified as T x E/ T = E.

And then because dU is a measure of a type of energy (internal energy), and TdS is converted also in energy, and pdV is also in energy/work units, here it is eas to understand what we talk about. The internal energy of a system changes (dU) in a tug of war between the energy that goes away as temperature that expands it (the old TdS=E factor and the energy that gets in as pressure that reduces its volume, the pdV factor).

In other words, the system looses Existential energy (ST) as entropic temperature (TdS), Ts goes away, as kinetic energy, while it gains it as imploding pressure, St, increases its form. ST= St±Ts.

‘Crystal clear’ in 5D terms as an exchange of dimotions, which are ultimately kinetic Ts explosive-energy vs. St-potential, implosive energy.

We can then interpret the key formula, E=nkT, whereas k is a boltzman unit of entropy, as yet another version of that TdS = Ts formula (however with k now as a spatial still form or constant, that doesn’t vary). The concept behindit is then similar, but only with the Ts-factor, reason why we say this E is not truly Energy (ST) but the ST<Ts<TT, expansive motion absorbed by the external human observer that often confuses ‘locomotion or kinetic energy, Ts and entropy or dual motion, TT’ with energy because it is what it wants to extract from the system (and then convert into ST, human useful energy as it gives it a new form.)

 

THERMODYNAMIC STATES. A CLASSIC ANALYSIS. THE MACRO-STATE PARAMETERS.

All this said we shall consider a more classic analysis from the perspective of humind’s praxis and ∆º functions.

For the ginormous man or human mechanism trapping little darling atoms, the details of the motion of those individual atoms is mostly irrelevant to the behavior of the system as a whole… provided the system is in thermodynamic equilibrium, that is the behaviour of each atom is rather indistinguishable, with a similar mean ‘energy=temperature’ in its body-wave actions.

Then the system can be described by a handful of macroscopic quantities, called “thermodynamic variables”:

The total energy E=ST, which will be equivalent to the product of its volume V=vital space, and pressure P of the vital space on its outer membrane… and finally its temperature, T. So what those 4 elements mean in ∆@st terms? Remember we need three only to describe a being in a space-time ternary symmetry as long as we keep it ‘simple’ in a single plane.

So the 3 first elements define what ‘ENERGY body-waves’ ARE always: the vital space or open ball (topologically speaking) of the system that does NOT include the singularity which ‘traverses’ the system along ∆±1 co-existing scales as the soul-brain that ‘perceives’ it all in scales, as a ‘scalar’ wholeness. Neither the encircling Ts-membrane (part of maximal motion still ‘ordered’).

Yet we do measure ENERGY = PRESSURE X VOLUME, because the volume is the vital space of the system and the pressure, the energy manifestation of that energy in the herder’s wall. So he can extract work, from the vital energy pressing on the wall (not included, so we are still measuring energy, the vital space, but absorbing that pressure). Thus we have successfully parameterized the micro state into a macro state in ‘equilibrium’ with the wall of the herder through pressure.

It is only left to describe the ‘y’ singularity, which connects the ∆-1 and ∆º scales, as a whole and so must be a ‘scalar parameter’ or ‘quantitative value’ that explains the whole. It is the scalar 4th parameter of temperature.

The macrostate of the system is then a description of its four thermodynamic variables.

We can use those crystal clear concepts to other less ‘observable’ scales, and apply them to mechanics, where the ∆º±1 scalar parameter will be mass, and its geometric point-locus will be the centre of mass, which maintains its fixed-singularity stable position, equivalent to the concept of ‘thermodynamic equilibrium (measuring the same temperature in the whole ensemble) through any motion, including rotary motions of the whole, and as long as it is in balance, (centre of gravity below torque) the whole system will be in gravitational equilibrium – themes those retaken in the ∆+1 post on mechanics and gravitation.

While all what we have said applies to the quantum state, regarding the ‘full description’ we can do of a quantum system by considering its position and momenta, which encloses (with minor corrections on abstract quantum Copenhagen bullshit) all the information about the being (position= field; momenta: wave-particle duality). And the equivalent ‘four vector’ formalism, which is a modern homologous way to describe all kind of physical systems, first born on Relativity:

In the graph, a 4 vector: In relativity, space-time coordinates (external field position) and the energy/momentum of a wave-particle (internal com≈position) are often expressed in four-vector form. They are defined so that the length of a four-vector is invariant=in equilibrium under a coordinate transformation.

Ultimately all those different formalisms of physics are homologous and always describes the 3 ST or 4 ∆@ST±1 elements of a being: its field position, wave-particle duality and scalar ∆º ‘wholeness that balances in equilibrium across ∆±1 scales’ the being (scalar parameter). The 4-vector is just the ‘geometric’ version according to the math duality of temporal, numerical algebraic solutions with symmetric spatial, topological ones.

We stress again that the ∆-1 (position-momenta)>∆º (e,p,v,t) equivalence simplifies the higher information (5D metric) of the ∆-1 microstate, for which we need to write down an impractically long list of numbers, whereas specifying a macrostate requires only a few numbers (E, V, T, P.), AS larger wholes have paradoxically less information (Scalar 5D graph).

However, thermodynamic equations only describe the macrostate of a system adequately when this system is in equilibrium – has a mind-point=scalar parameter (temperature, centre of mass) that balances it. Non-equilibrium situations can generally not be described by a small number of variables. And this works for all systems of nature, which need an SS parameter of balance for them to organise – yet entropy-only physicists consider thermal equilibrium the ‘death of the system’, from the human observer, as obviously an ordered system cannot die=release entropy for a larger ∆º system to ab=use it. On the contrary the existence of SS-scalar self-centered numbers/points, thus prove the sentient, vital, orderly, fractal, organic nature of the Universe, in all its scales, which always tend to balance the s,st,t parameters across all its citizens-cells-atoms (S,B,P systems)

As a simple example, consider adding a drop of food coloring to a glass of water. The food coloring diffuses in a complicated matter, which is in practice very difficult to precisely predict. However, after sufficient time has passed the system will reach a uniform color, which is much less complicated to describe. Actually, the macroscopic state of the system will be described by a small number of variables only if the system is at global thermodynamic equilibrium.

Thirdly, because there is more information in ∆-1 complex assemblies of micro points, more than one microstate can correspond to a single macrostate.

In fact, for any given macrostate, there will be a huge number of microstates that are consistent with the given values of E, V, P, T.

But this again is a feature of all systems, whose ‘languages, micro-points and ∆-1 states have more freedom, variations than the ∆+i states’ and it is one of the most beautiful proofs of the existence of a scalar god, on top of the previous graph-pyramid of ∆-scales), as 0-mind of the Universe, since at the end in all systems there will be a ‘whole, SS’ with as little information as a scalar number/ratio/constant that resumes what all the other scales have in common.

So when we put together the 2 concepts of entropy in mathematical physics, entropy of thermodynamics and entropy of theory of information, we realise in the midst of its philosophical mantras, physicists are tinkering with the ‘time garden of bifurcations’ (Borges beautiful tale) and/or possible choices of future, seeking to ‘eliminate’ entropy=find a deterministic future path to their inquires.

How from this rather ‘scholastic’ concept akin to how many ‘angels fit dancing on a pin’ ‘heated’ arguments of Sorbonne’s first scholar≈University dogmatism, which brought Middle Age Aristotelian Christian thinkers to sword and dagger debates, physicists have come to enthusiastic battles of the absolute (big bang entropy universes, disorder dimotions, multiple quantum path solutions of parallel Universes, etc.) is a theme which frankly does not interest me more than the ‘∞ angels’ fit on the pin. As the hyperbolic philosophy of entropy sponsored by physicists is mostly nonsense egocy.

Thus it turns out that S is itself a thermodynamic property, just like E, P, T or V. Therefore, it acts as a link between the microscopic world and the macroscopic. And so now we do have the fifth element for a full description of the thermodynamic system, as we can consider ‘entropy’ to be the ∆±1 ‘partner’ parameter of ‘temperature’, which gives to thermodynamics, as we said at the beginning of this post, the ‘wholeness’ of close range observation, with the full 5 parameters of the 5 relative dimensions of any ∆º±ST reality:

Volume(Ts), Energy (ST), Pressure (Time closed cycle), Temperature (scalar parameter of whole order: ∆-1>∆) and entropy (scalar parameter of whole disorder, ∆-1<∆).

To notice on the side of quantitative terms: since Ω is a natural number (1,2,3,…), S is either zero or positive (ln(1) = 0, ln Ω ≥ 0.)

FOGGY physicists who don’t understand either the meaning of ±numbers tend to consider this a proof of the Universal growing disorder as they don’t either understand entropy and the ternary e-growing trifurcations of the future paths of any system. It really means only what we said: that the ∆-1 scale has always more information than the ∆-scale and so if we rest the final deterministic single path of the whole from the many entropic paths of the parts, we get a positive entropy number.

A second consideration more technical, which we shall tackle whenever we widen this barebones article concerns the 2 uses of entropy in thermodynamics,  statistical and Boltzmann’s entropy, which consider a less number of ‘variations’ of ∆-1 micro states. Thus statistical entropy reduces to Boltzmann’s entropy when all the accessible microstates of the system are equally likely.

It is also the configuration corresponding to the maximum of a system’s entropy for a given set of accessible microstates, in other words the macroscopic configuration in which the lack of information about the future is maximal.

As such, according to the second law of thermodynamics, it is the equilibrium configuration of an isolated system. Boltzmann’s entropy is the expression of entropy at thermodynamic equilibrium in the canonical ensemble; which is so useful as all systems do tend to have an isomorphic internal indistinguishable ensemble of ∆-1 cells/citizens/atoms for the whole SS system to treat them wholesale with their ∆º parameters.

This postulate, which is known as Boltzmann’s principle, may be regarded as the foundation of statistical mechanics, which describes thermodynamic systems using the statistical behavior of its constituents. And so from here on, even if I never, lazy cow, return to this article you can just understand the whole discipline; which as all physics is fascinating if physicists stick to their guns: mathematical physics and ask humble advice to us, philosophers of science, regarding what they do (-: that would be the day 🙂

Entropy as a measure of vital free energy, enthalpy, temperature and entropy equations

The Helmholtz energy is defined as: A≡U−TS

Where A is the Helmholtz free energy, which in 5D becomes a measure of the 1st Ðimotion available to the ‘mind system’ as lineal momentum.

U is the internal energy of the system (SI: joules, CGS: ergs), which becomes the 3Ðimotion or vital energy of the system.

T is the absolute temperature of the surroundings, modeled as a heat bath, hence the measure of the ‘external angular momentum’ membrane, which multiplied by S, entropy becomes the parameter of the external membrane.

So we really write 1 Ð(free energy) +  2Ð (TS) = 3Ð (internal energy)

Worldcycles of energy integrated in all its entropic future branching.

Now, returning to classic thermodynamics, we shall change our perspective from Ʊi to the S, T, ST elements of the Ƽ scale, which as usual being the human scale is the one we are more interested in.

First we must reconsider how humans translate the different dimotions of futures into a quantitative parameter. And for that aim we can consider the key equation that relates the 4 parameters of temperature, volume, entropy and energy.

In 5D, entropy defines all the possible paths of future of a system, which develop in sequential processes, and increase in SS, solid states, whose smaller volume implies a faster speed of time cycles (∆ metric: TT x SS = K). On the other hand energy integrates all the momenta from past to future, closing the entire world cycle of the being.

And so since solid states have more modes of vibration, they store more energy, in a faster manner (the same can be found in the ∆-1 translation of energy = h v, which increases with the vibrations.

So ultimately energy integrates both, the time-events or frequencies and temperatures, and the parallel splits of time in different futures all of which happen to be accounted into the energy volume. And the question we shall find once and again in different systems is if they are ‘parallel universe’ (no really, that is just physicists imagination), or they happen in sequential time and become ‘stored’ as past tails (sometimes) or they branch out as the branches of a tree, simultaneously and give birth to different ‘resonances’ of the same being, In brief, energy integrates all, but all can be a split of populations in space, or an acceleration of frequencies and temperatures in time. And humans sometimes cannot distinguish both. I.e are the three colours of gluons different gluons or the same gluon evolving in time? 

This said in a general manner we can now understand one of the fundamental equations of thermodynamics, the so-called Maxwell relationship, which basically expresses the law of conservation of energy, we have already analysed in terms of pressure and volume in terms of temperature and entropy:

where E is the energy, S is the entropy, and the partial derivative is taken at constant volume. So we can also write T ∂ S = ∂ E, where the increase of entropy and energy are closely related, in as much as a larger entropy – more possible paths of future, has a larger energy, since those paths of future must ALL take place, which can only be the case if there is either consecutive causal time sequence of them (in a system faster in time than one which only stores a determined path without entropy), or a branching of futures.

This a profound result with interesting results in all sciences, as in all there will be branching, giving birth to a ternary ‘being’ in space; or partition of a whole into different futures, as each chaotic group takes a different path.

In its most profound meaning, it means that the Universe for any ‘partition of species’, will try all possible paths of future, regardless of the quantity of populations≈ probabilities (a space-time symmetry, similar to the just described), each one happens. In history it will mean there are as many fractal planets as possible histories there are: in some humans survive; in most, robots and strangelets take over… In biology that all mutations do happen in a chaotic way by ‘chance’ but then only certain paths survive.

 So yes, once we understand with certain conceptual finesse the laws of physics they give us interpretations for far more complex systems, in as much as its simplicity leave the first principles of the homological Universe crystal clear (except for physicists, it seems 🙂

Schwarz’s identity, Maxwell relations, and the reversible symmetry of space anytime forms and functions.

Next, we can consider the relationships between mathematical physics and entropy, since the previous equation and the whole set of Maxwell relationships between thermodynamic parameters respond to a larger homological mathematical equation the Schwarz’s theorem – which establishes for an enormous range of functions the fact that if we derivate in space and then in time, due to the symmetry of space forms and time functions, the result is equivalent to derivate in time first and then in space. So we find this hidden jewel of ‘experimental mathematics’ in many different equations. As Schwarz’s theorem expresses one of the fundamental laws of the Universe, the symmetry of process which evolve together first in space and then in time or vice versa, as ∆nalysis shows a derivative to be an evolution/densification of a system of parts into a ‘whole’ whose ‘present parameter, ∆s/∆t is the derivative in time and its inverse ∆t/∆s the derivative in space.

This understood properly in terms of informative time; entropic space; and its bidimensional combinations (holographic principle) implies that for systems of minimal order, it does not exist a distinction between spatial herds of populations – a mere slice of present in a flow of time – and equivalent stochastic process in time with ‘no causal memory’ (entropic, ‘markovian’ processes as those involved in heat and thermodynamics, or in Brownian systems, where past events do not influence present ones ) and time truly becomes a space dimension or vice versa 

Its application once we understand its S≈T meaning  will guides the analysis of many stientific concepts and parameters not yet fully understood. In the case of thermodynamics, they are the origin of the Maxwell relations, which encode; as the Maxwell equations of electromagnetism encode a ternary system with a magnetic membrane a SS charge and its dual ST relationships; the basic structure of an ∆º thermodynamic system. The graph arranges them according to the fundamental law of 5D:

Energy (ST) = TT x SS… so the reader can easily assess, both the cyclical nature of space-time process and the exact matching of thermodynamic equations with the Generator of all ternary systems of reality

The application of thermodynamic principles begins by defining a system that is in some sense different from its surroundings. For example, the system could be a sample of gas inside a cylinder with a movable piston, an entire steam engine, a marathon runner, the planet Earth, a neutron star, a black hole, or even the entire universe. In general, systems are free to exchange heat, work, and other forms of energy with their surroundings.

This classic approach is limited in its scope, as we must first define the system, more precisely in its 3 x 3 + 0’ dimensions, to know if it is a complete system (with 3 co-existing scales, 3 topologies, 3 time ages and 1 mind-point), in which case there will not be entropy but rather information-creation by the mind on a closed system, growing its information at expenses of the external world – case of life systems (x, x, x in the graph).

When the system looses its mind-point, there is no internal element of order. So the system is ‘ready’ to give up part of its information to an external agent. Yet if the enclosing membrane remains (a fact not easily obtained through time, as it is managed and maintained in isolation by the invagination and connection with its @mind-point), the system will remain in balance with no exchange of e or i (x,x,√) at the ∆+1 ‘mechanical level, leaking though disordered, entropic heat at the ∆-1 level. And a similar case, when the systems only thermally isolated at ∆-1 level happens: the system can be used to cause work, as the mechanical, motion, ∆-level is not isolated. 

So what we know as classic thermodynamics apply to such systems in which either or both of the ∆-1 and ∆+1 quantum and mechanical scales are NOT isolated and transfer of energy and motion in inverse faction happens between them (open and closed system); and to those systems the laws of thermodynamic apply when we do a ceteris paribus analysis from the point of view of a single scale – disregarding the order or entropy ∆ or  effects on those 2 other scales.

Only such systems we shall call ‘thermodynamic engines’, classic laws apply. Then those laws will refer basically to the Conservation of present energy of a system, where the present energy is given by the temperature and its composite elements will be volume or expansive entropy and pressure or increasing order, given us the 1st key equation of thermodynamics:

P (t) x V (s) = nK T (exi content)

For example a gas in a cylinder with a movable piston, the state of the system is identified by the temperature, pressure, and volume of the gas. Where the volume is proportional to the spatial expansion or TT-entropy as expansive motion, defined in 5D; the pressure is its inverse ‘pure form’ function, or dimotion of order. And the nKT element the present, energy x information parameter of the system, ‘its existential force’ calculated multiplying its quanta of entropy-space, nK and its speed of time, its ‘frequency of time vibration’, T.

In such systems it also applies the fundamental law of ‘immortality of time’, which states that: ‘a closed path of time has not done work, hence spent its potential energy, when it returns to its initial space-time condition’

So P, V, and kT are characteristic parameters that have definite values at each state and are independent of the way in which the system arrived at that state. In other words, any change in value of a property depends only on the initial and final states of the system, not on the path followed by the system from one state to another. Such properties are called state functions.

In contrast, when we talk of an open system (√,√,√) the final state is not one of balance, since there is a gain or loss of energy and information which the external system absorbs or gives. So, the final work done as the piston moves and the gas expands and the heat the gas absorbs from its surroundings depend on the detailed way in which the expansion occurs.

The behaviour of a complex thermodynamic system, such as Earth’s atmosphere, can be understood by first applying the principles of states and properties to its component parts—in this case, water, water vapour, and the various gases making up the atmosphere. By isolating samples of material whose states and properties can be controlled and manipulated, properties and their interrelations can be studied as the system changes from state to state. It is though not accurate to consider then ‘ceteris paribus analysis’ of the system to uphold the wrong limited classic laws of entropy. I.e. when we consider the Earth-sun system we wrongly state that the order of the planet grows because the disorder of the star happens giving up ¥-energy. But it does NOT consider the ∆+3 scale of gravitational, increasing order, which in fact will finally dominate collapsing the star. It is then we could talk of the whole solar system in ‘e x i equilibrium’, which classic thermodynamics called a…

Thermodynamic equilibrium

Classic thermodynamics is concerned then with the different states of disorder, when there is a dynamic transfer of Pt, Vs and nkT (ST) between systems, which changes the system parameters of e x i, or with the different paths a system can use to get from a state to other; changing only one of those parameters; which are analysis of value for all other studies of single space-time systems at all other scales.

In that regard, a particularly important concept is thermodynamic equilibrium, in which there is no tendency for the state of a system to change spontaneously. For example, the gas in a cylinder with a movable piston will be at equilibrium if the temperature and pressure inside are uniform and if the restraining force on the piston is just sufficient to keep it from moving. The system can then be made to change to a new state only by an externally imposed change in one of the state functions, such as the temperature by adding heat or the volume by moving the piston. A sequence of one or more such steps connecting different states of the system is called a process. In general, a system is not in equilibrium as it adjusts to an abrupt change in its environment. For example, when a balloon bursts, the compressed gas inside is suddenly far from equilibrium, and it rapidly expands until it reaches a new equilibrium state.

However, the same final state could be achieved by placing the same compressed gas in a cylinder with a movable piston and applying a sequence of many small increments in volume (and temperature), with the system being given time to come to equilibrium after each small increment.

Such a process is said to be reversible because the system is at (or near) equilibrium at each step along its path, and the direction of change could be reversed at any point.

This example illustrates how two different paths can connect the same initial and final states.

The first is irreversible (the balloon bursts), and the second is reversible. The concept of reversible processes is something like motion without friction in mechanics.

It represents an idealized limiting case that is very useful in discussing the properties of real systems. Many of the results of thermodynamics are derived from the properties of reversible processes. And the first conclusion we obtain from that duality, is indeed a general law of all systems: When the change is very fast and the system cannot ‘reorganise step by step’ of its frequency motions, the simultaneous location of all its parts, the system becomes disordered. As all entropic, death processes and big-bangs, ∆+1<<∆-1, are by definition fast transformations that erase the disorder of the system.

Yet when those changes are minimal, where the parameter of temporal order is higher (slow processes with minute changes) than the parameter of expansive space, the process is fully reversible with no entropy: ∆<∆-1>∆.

Temperature

In an open system however, ‘Heat does not flow spontaneously from a colder region to a hotter region, or, equivalently, heat at a given temperature cannot be converted entirely into work.

Thus, the concept of temperature is fundamental then to any discussion of thermodynamics, as it is the parameter of frequency in time, hence of the speed of the system in its time clocks, which will vary all the other parameters of the system to define its existential SxT force, which in all systems grow when S-imultaneity in space and size grow (spatial force) or its temporal frequency and timing of its actions-reactions grow (temperature speed), within the S≈T limits of internal balance allowed by the system (homeostasis), which for any system establishes an interval of temperature of maximal efficiency.

Thus Temperature is a measure of the density of energy and information, of the frequency of motion, of the quantity of temporal form, of the existential momentum of a thermodynamic ensemble of waves, particle and fields of the ∆±1 planes of existence, with ∆o humans on its middle point. As such temperature is the frequency of the activity of a certain environment in those planes, which increases as we increase the parameters which will increase that density such as Pt x Vs = n Ks Tt

Yet, in any assemble of ∆-1 forms, the dimotion of social evolution dominates the system. So when one ∆-1 element has a higher frequency of existence it will share it among SIMILAR entities by colliding and transferring them energy. Without the existence of an attractor, @mind, Maxwell’s demon in the system, the energy of the system will remain in a wave, steady state equilibrium, providing the external membrane is closed, or else it will dissipate its entropy if the external ‘pressure membrane’ disappears.

Temperature is therefore a social form of energy ∆-1 systems prefer to shared to equalise its parameter of energy and information with its close clone molecules.

So, when two objects are brought into thermal contact, heat will flow between them until they come into equilibrium with each other. When the flow of heat stops, they are said to be at the same temperature.

The zeroth law of thermodynamics formalizes this by asserting that if an object A is in simultaneous thermal equilibrium with two other objects B and C, then B and C will be in thermal equilibrium with each other if brought into thermal contact.

Object A can then play the role of a thermometer through some change in its physical properties with temperature, such as its volume or its electrical resistance.

With the definition of equality of temperature in hand, it is possible then to establish a temperature scale by assigning numerical values to certain easily reproducible fixed points. And consider in an opposite fashion to thermodynamic classic laws that:

‘When entropy increases in the system as a whole, an equal amount of order created by isotemperature equilibrium happens in the ∆-1 scale of the system’.

Work and energy

Energy has a precise meaning in classic single ∆-scale physics that does not correspond to the concept of 5D.

The word is derived from the Greek word ergon, meaning work, but the term work itself acquired a technical meaning with the advent of Newtonian mechanics. For example, a man pushing on a car may feel that he is doing a lot of work, but no work is actually done unless the car moves. The work done is then the product of the force applied by the man multiplied by the distance through which the car moves. If there is no friction and the surface is level, then the car, once set in motion, will continue rolling indefinitely with constant speed. The rolling car has something that a stationary car does not have—it has kinetic energy of motion equal to the work required to achieve that state of motion.

The introduction of the concept of energy in this way is of great value in mechanics because, in the absence of friction, energy is never lost from the system, although it can be converted from one form to another. What this means in 5D is that closed motions, which are time motions do not spend work or energy because the Universe never spends its immortal closed motions, which is ultimately the substance of which it is made. YOU LIVE in a Universe of time in which spaces are just partial parts, open motions that invariably will return as a zero sum, in spatial, topological form, ages, or scales. 

For example, if a coasting car comes to a hill, it will roll some distance up the hill before coming to a temporary stop. At that moment its kinetic energy of motion has been converted into its potential energy of position, which is equal to the work required to lift the car through the same vertical distance. After coming to a stop, the car will then begin rolling back down the hill until it has completely recovered its kinetic energy of motion at the bottom. In the absence of friction, such systems are said to be conservative because at any given moment the total amount of energy (kinetic plus potential) remains equal to the initial work done to set the system in motion.

As the science of physics expanded to cover an ever-wider range of phenomena, it became necessary to include additional forms of energy in order to keep the total amount of energy constant for all closed systems (or to account for changes in total energy for open systems).

For example, if work is done to accelerate charged particles, then some of the resultant energy will be stored in the form of electromagnetic fields and carried away from the system as radiation. In turn the electromagnetic energy can be picked up by a remote receiver (antenna) and converted back into an equivalent amount of work. With his theory of special relativity, Albert Einstein realized that energy (E) can also be stored as mass (m) and converted back into energy, as expressed by his famous equation E = mc2, where c is the velocity of light. All of these systems are said to be conservative in the sense that energy can be freely converted from one form to another without limit. Each fundamental advance of physics into new realms has involved a similar extension to the list of the different forms of energy.

Yet because there was not a concept of fractal scales, the relationship between those forms of energy and the relative present states of each scale, its different time clocks and quanta of space, where not clearly defined.

Thermodynamics encompasses all of these forms of energy, with the further addition of heat to the list of different kinds of energy.

However, heat, which is a concept restricted to the subjective human desire to ‘be the focus and attention of all other scales’ is fundamentally different from the others in that the conversion of work (or other forms of energy) into heat is not completely reversible. Since it is not the whole tale, but merely the duality of human scales.

So this specific law of energy-information transfer MEANS merely that part of the motion from ∆+1 < ∑∆-1 becomes absorbed, stolen by the more informative ∆-1 entities, unless there is truly an organic network that establishes the simultaneity of all those motions (as in biological organisms):

∆ +1  ‹ SS ∆  + Ts ∆-1

That is ∆+1 transfers part of its motion to the well organise, synchronous ∆-particles of the lower scale, but also to its field, ∆-1 which won’t return it back.

In the example of the rolling car, some of the work done to set the car in motion is inevitably lost as heat due to friction, and the car eventually comes to a stop on a level surface. Even if all the generated heat were collected and stored in some fashion, it could never be converted entirely back into mechanical energy of motion. This fundamental limitation is expressed quantitatively by the second law of thermodynamics (see below).

The role of friction in degrading the energy of mechanical systems may seem simple and obvious, but the quantitative connection between heat and work, as first discovered by Count Rumford, played a key role in understanding the operation of steam engines in the 19th century and similarly for all energy-conversion processes today.

At least 25 percent of the heat energy produced must be exhausted into the environment as waste heat to avoid violating the second law of thermodynamics. Because of various imperfections, such as friction and imperfect thermal insulation, the actual efficiency of power plants seldom exceeds about 60 percent. However, because of the second law of thermodynamics, no amount of ingenuity or improvements in design can increase the efficiency beyond about 75 percent.

Entropy and heat death

The example of a heat engine illustrates one of the many ways in which the second law of thermodynamics can be applied. One way to generalize the example is to consider the heat engine and its heat reservoir as parts of an isolated (or closed) system—i.e., one that does not exchange heat or work with its surroundings. For example, the heat engine and reservoir could be encased in a rigid container with insulating walls. In this case the second law of thermodynamics (in the simplified form presented here) says that no matter what process takes place inside the container, its entropy must increase or remain the same in the limit of a reversible process. Similarly, if the universe is an isolated system, then its entropy too must increase with time. Indeed, the implication is that the universe must ultimately suffer a “heat death” as its entropy progressively increases toward a maximum value and all parts come into thermal equilibrium at a uniform temperature. After that point, no further changes involving the conversion of heat into useful work would be possible. In general, the equilibrium state for an isolated system is precisely that state of maximum entropy. (This is equivalent to an alternate definition for the term entropy as a measure of the disorder of a system, such that a completely random dispersion of elements corresponds to maximum entropy, or minimum information. )

RECAP. The 3±i dimotions or ‘states’ of matter, Ts-gaseous, energetic states, ST, liquid balanced states and SS informative solid states, form together molecular matter in its ∆+1 social scale.

The concept of Entropy: thermodynamic parameters, order and emergence. Boltzmann’s principle

The relationship between ∆-1, the molecular state and ∆º, the temperature state uncovers basic relationships and parameters of ∆ºst molecular, matter systems of physics.

In the translation of sciences to stiences, we always depart of a theoretical minimum 5D knowledge of the ternary ∆ºst±1 symmetries of the being and its parts, which is what we shall find described in a non-orderly way in science. So happens in thermodynamics, which describe the ternary parts of physical systems in both levels through… Boltzmann’s definition of entropy as a measure of the number of possible microscopic states (or ∆-1: molecular microstates) of a system in thermodynamic equilibrium, consistent with its macroscopic thermodynamic properties (or ∆º Temperature macrostate).

To understand what microstates and macrostates are, consider the example of a gas in a container.

At a microscopic level, the gas consists of a vast number of freely moving atoms, which occasionally collide with one another and with the walls of the container.

Then the ∆-1 microstate of the system is a description of its Generator equation in terms of:

∆-1: Ts: positions in the field of the system & momenta≈ St-wave>T-particle parameters of all its ∆º=∑∆-1 atoms.

In principle, all the physical properties of the system are determined by its micro state, because physicists without knowing are indeed using the position in the entropic field and the momenta (st: body wave> SS: particle head), which explains the whole ternary elements of each  molecular ‘unit’ of the ∑∆-1:∆º atomic ensemble.

So what thermodynamics will do is to ‘translate’ the parameters of ∆-1 micro states into the parameters of ∆º macro states to be useful for human-scale ab=use of the happy, free atoms in its chaotic micro-state.

But humans find a natural resistance of ∆º atomic entities to give away its vital energy’ to do ‘work’ for human ginormous jerks – to put some irony to the human inverse pov – atoms do NOT want to enslave and behave and give us all their energy and drop dead, alas! that is a sure sign the Universe is imperfect, entropic and it will die.

humans we call a ‘dead heat’ balance or thermodynamic equilibrium means the ∆-1 scale, ‘refuses’ to become ‘organised’ and synchronised by the ∆º-scale, and prefers to remain in a herd, wave, ‘relatively free’ scale. It is only entropy from the human point of view. For atoms is just trying to conserve (as rebel humans under a dictator) a minimum freedom and just get ‘hot’, disordered as long as they can, while humans will try to do as all farmers: Limit the entropy of its herd, encircling into an external TT-membrane which puts some pressure on them to become ordered. And this game of entropy at micro-state vs. Pressure/encircling order at macro-state is what thermodynamics studies (of course without any vital, organic Maxwellian demons involved).

Because the number of atoms or any ∆-1 ensemble of finitesimals is so large, for the whole herd to work, the ∆º being will consider all its individual finitesimals indistinguishable, which is a pre-requisite to organise huge herds as generic ‘ fields’  susceptible to be ordered by the ∆º-mind being with ‘huge’, simple changes in the parameters of S, St, T (Entropy, energy, form) of the herded mass.

An ∆+1 scale orders wholesale its parts with general homogenous changes on the S, T, and ST parameters that affect the ∆-1 scale. For example in history in the 800 cycles of nomadic, entropic weapon-makers destroy fertile crescent cultures when the earth which might be macro-managing its evolution into the mechanocene age of metals or produces huge heat changes of climate that affect homogeneously the whole; it is how physical systems manage herds of atoms with changes in magnetic domain ‘walls’ that influence ensembles of one million atoms.

So the first element for the herders whole-singularities is TO encircle with a closed wall the ensemble – EARTH we forecast and has been recently found manages with its singularity core and ‘chimneys’ to the surface, the weather cycles and glaciations that define its evolution; the electric charge singularity controls with the magnetic encircling walls the structure of its atomic ensembles, and humans control heat-energy with pressure walls that encircle an ensemble of atoms. And voila! suddenly we have the ‘self-similar’ ∆º,¹ macro-state equivalents to ST>t momenta and Ts: position parameters to do ‘equations of thermodynamics’, which will use the ∆nalysis maths (diffusion equations from the ∆º perspective, entropy equations from the ∆-1 perspective) to compare both scales.

What makes this fascinating for ∆st±¡ systems of any scale is that we can extract by the Disomorphic method general laws of 5D from thermodynamics, as it is mathematically the most profound analysis of an ∆º±1 exchange of flows of TT-entropy, ST-energy and SS-form once we correct the conceptual understanding of its equations of micro and macro states.

RECAP. Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics deal with the ∆º matter scale from the perspective of its ∆±1 relationships. STate physics studies 3 dimotions of matter in a single plane, Ts-gas, ST-liquids and St-‘crystal clear solid minds’ 5D adds to State physics its description through the 3 topological functions of space-time (S-st-T) symmetries (its world cycles in sequential 3 ages time and topological trinity organs in space), not dealt with in this introduction.

All the laws of thermodynamics are right if we were in a ceteris paribus Universe where only the dimotion of entropy exists. But that dimotion is just the measure of disorder, in reality, all those laws are balanced by the liquid and solid states, and then as in any other scale entropy becomes balanced:

In the graphs, the true meaning of entropy for each form of matter in which its equations co-exist with those of cryogenics is to calculate the capacity of disorder of each form, which for some like water will be minimal, with an extensive range of liquid=ST reproductive states, reason why it can give birth to life, while other substances like Methane are easily gained by entropy and become gaseous. The inverse of entropy as stated in physics (always ambivalent with the concepts of locomotion, sT and energy, ST) becomes then the crystalline order of solids; and the concepts of metaphysical entropy applied to them, as potential possible forms and ‘states’ quite irrelevant beyond that measure; as most variations of states of an entropic gas are completely indistinguishable for praxis; just random distributions of matter in a volume of space. Randomness does NOT really carry relevant information.

 

Ƽ SCALES +ST LAWS: THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM

For a full understanding of the workings of matter systems we have though to combine scale laws and ternary s-st-t laws and treat THE SYSTEM, regardless of size and complexity, when it is a ‘whole’ as a supœrganism which will balance the three parts, S-past operandi T-future≈st-present, of the system, within the ‘limits of the ∆º thermodynamic scale’. And so we find as the most important laws of thermodynamics, the…

Equipartition theorem on Thermodynamic equilibrium.

The name “equipartition” means “equal division,” in Latin.

The original concept of equipartition was that the total kinetic energy of a system is shared equally among all of its independent parts, on the average, once the system has reached thermal equilibrium, as all supœrganisms are in energetic balance between its limbs/fields, body-waves and heads-particle, where the st-body ‘absorbs’ the energy that it will share in equal parts with the limbs/fields and body/head system.

Hence the enormous range of equations for all systems of the form: S± T = ST, which in physics tend to be written in terms of potential SS energy due to position/form and kinetic, moving energy.

This is then the origin of the viral equation, and in the quantum scale the Schrödinger equation, basically an expression of ST (WAVE left side o the equation) equal to Potential + Kinetic energy (left side).

The viral equation however refines the concept establishing that the potential ‘SS’ energy of the system (often energy means in human conceptual fog, motion, so entropy but that is irrelevant now) is 1/2 of the kinetic energy, which comes to say that the limb/field system tends to consume twice the energy of the head-system:  E (ð) = 2 E ($), a quantitative relationship that holds surprisingly for many systems of the Universe in all its scales.

Since, the virial theorem also holds for quantum mechanics, as first shown by Fock, giving further ground to Einstein’s dictum that both statistical mechanics and quantum mechanise are the same…

An interesting isomorphism of scalesViral theorem in the quantum, thermodynamic and human scale.

Let us consider this insight in more detail, as a key concept to fusion all scales of physics is to return to Broglie->Einstein->Bohm realist formulation of quantum physics.

In the graph, when Bohm wrote in polar coordinates Schrodinger’s ‘present st-wave’ equation voila! the particle appeared feeding in a quantum potential field faster than light – the underlying gravitational field, dQ/dt (t), or guiding equation.

Yet since Schrodinger’s equation merely writes ST (WAVE state) i∂/∂t Ψ = Potential + Kinetic energy, it must be easily related to the viral equation, whereas d Q/ dt must be the field/limb system of the quantum entity. And so it must also hold the viral theorem according to which potential energy will be 1/2 of the kinetic energy of the system. And that is the case as Fock found:

The left-hand side of this equation is just dQ/dt  according to Heisenberg’s equation of motion. So the viral theorem for quantum physics tell us that the $-field which guides and ‘feeds of entropic motions’ the complementary body-particle, kinetic-potential energy system shares its extracted entropy between the kinetic body wave of the system and the particle-head-potential form in the same proportion that all other systems of nature: twice for motion, one for perception. Does this law rule also human metabolic systems? Do your brain uses 1/2 of the energy of your body or limbs?

This of course would seem far stretched as the head/particle of the system is very small, but as it is faster in time-energy it uses much more of it, and as it is internally connected and synchronised (Broglie’s inner clocks in quantum, nervous system in physiology) with the rest of the body-limbs it controls, it indeed uses a lot of energy.

It is indeed well established that the brain uses more energy than any other human organ, accounting for up to 20 percent of the body’s total haul.

So in a ‘classic’ human/animal being, which is ‘all the time running’ we can consider a simple proportion: TT (40%) + ST (40%) + SS (20%), which will be the expression of the viral theorem for biological systems, whereas the balance between limbs and bodies obviously is extremely variable as it is conditioned by the external world and actions of the being, it cannot control, but the 20% proportion of brain systems in fully developed (no longer evolving towards higher information) species, as humans, the ‘summit’ of life evolution before we transfer our information to robots, is, is stable as it is used in internal energy tasks, homeostatic and relatively shielded from the external world by the equilibrium and membrane of the inner ∆-1 world of the mind.

Then we find that of that energy again a ‘classic dual or ternary quantitative equipartition’ takes place:

Until now, most scientists believed that it used the bulk of that energy to fuel electrical impulses that neurons employ to communicate with one another. Turns out, though, that two thirds of the brain’s energy is used to help neurons or nerve cells “fire” or send signals to control the body-limbs. So the equipartition here is even more precise as 1/3rd goes for the brain and then again ±1/3rd should go to the body and ±1/3rd to the limbs… 

Equipartition laws are thus fundamental structural laws of ternary and dual nature, which establish the harmonious working together of the 3 ‘GENERATOR’ subsystems of any entity of the Universe, and as such are part of the ‘core’ equations of 5D.

All those elements of 5Dhermodynamics can be expressed as usual with different equations as EACH OF the ∆ºst perspectives have a ‘slightly biased’ form of expressing its laws. Hence the need to reference them to the ‘simpler, streamlined’ partial equations of the Generator.

So the extension of ∆º physics is immense, and we just shall consider a few samples of theorems and translate them to the laws of balance of 5D. A very interesting part of it are the equations that combine ∆-issues of scaling and S-st-T balances and symmetries between lineal, cyclical and wave-like motions. They represent the laws of balance and harmony between the parts of a system applied to the molecular scale.

The first of those laws is the concept that a supœrganism tends to an homeostatic, ‘just’ distribution of its present energy among all the elements of the system. While the system might be in a predatory relationship with the external world loosing or gaining energy within it will tend to find a thermodynamic equilibrium, which is in thermodynamics the fundamental law that translates the balances between the three elements of the supœrganism.

The original idea of equipartition is thermal equilibrium: the energy (read motion and form, e x i) of the system is shared equally among all of its various forms. This means the average kinetic energy per degree of freedom in the translational motion of a molecule should equal that of its rotational motions, which is just an expression of the balance between the complementary ‘SS-particle-rotary motion states’ ≈ ‘Ts-field-lineal motion states”: |≈0.

The interest of those laws all turning around thermal equilibrium is that they combine ∆ and st elements, allowing quantitative predictions, for all the ∆§cales of growth between the two limits of quantum and gravitation, where the laws break, as we enter into a ‘Lorentzian’ discontinuum where the TT x SS=Konstant 5d metric reshuffle itself in two opposite paths (of larger information weight for larger motion). So the equilibrium breaks to be reinstore under the slightly changed metric of ∆+1 gravitational systems or ∆-1 quantum ones.

The equipartition theorem is therefore very good to make detailed quantitative predictions, for each decametric ∆§cale and molecular system in the ‘lineal zone of balanced metric’.

Like the virial theorem, it gives us the total average kinetic and potential energies for a system at a given temperature, which will tend to become balanced, o≈|.

But, equipartition also gives the average values of individual components of the energy, such as the kinetic energy of a particular particle or the potential energy of a single spring. For example, it predicts that every atom in a monatomic ideal gas has an average kinetic energy of (3/2)kBT in thermal equilibrium, where kB is the Boltzmann constant and T is the (thermodynamic) temperature.

It follows from this fundamental S≈T balance that the equipartition theorem can be used to derive the ideal gas law, as both are expressions in the ∆-1 and ∆o (ideal gas law) of the same 5D metric balance.

The Limits

How far it can be stretched in scaling of molecular systems – or in other terms how far the thermodynamic scale of ‘matter’ stretches is shown in the fact that the law can also be used to predict the properties of stars, even white dwarfs and neutron stars, since it holds even when relativistic effects are considered. It is precisely at those ‘upper, gravitational and lower, quantum’ levels when the transition between scales distorts the balances between ‘kinetic vs. potential, | vs. O parameters’, where we can observe the most interesting dynamic ‘events between two waters.’

So we observe as we move upwards in scaling and the system becomes ‘cooler’ (neutron stars) how the ‘upper scale’ of gravitation ‘sips in’, predates the thermal energy and finally cools down near 0, where the ‘lower part/scale of thermodynamics’ fades away, ‘encased’ in the gravitational tensor of energy-matter stress which becomes the new ‘parameters’ of the ∆+1 scale.

And viceversa, although the equipartition theorem makes very accurate predictions in certain conditions, it becomes inaccurate when quantum effects are significant, in the inverse ∆-1 plane, also at low temperatures, when thermodynamics fades away:

When the thermal energy k T is smaller than the quantum energy spacing in a particular degree of freedom, the average energy and heat capacity of this degree of freedom are less than the values predicted by equipartition.

Such a degree of freedom is said to be “frozen out” when the thermal energy is much smaller than this spacing. For example, the heat capacity of a solid decreases at low temperatures as various types of motion become frozen out, rather than remaining constant as predicted by equipartition.

Such decreases in heat capacity – equipartition’s failure to model black-body radiation— the ultraviolet catastrophe— as we have seen led Max Planck to suggest quantum physics.

∆+1 enclosure, ∆-1, eaten inside out…

It IS for us more telling to express the duality of this ‘fading away’ of a thermodynamic state-being, when we move upwards or downwards into the gravitational or quantum scale in topological scalar terms:

When we grow in excess of size, the effects of ‘pressure’ due to gravitational attraction slow down the thermodynamic motions of the system, while the curved distortion of space-time finally ‘encases’ through ‘gravitomagnetic forces’, the orderly transformation of thermal energy into a vortex-like structure with angular momentum≈membranes that ‘freeze out’ expansive thermodynamic heat into its inverse implosive gravitational force. So we suffer an inversion of roles as we emerge upwards: ∆-1 thermodynamic $pe kinetic energy-> gravitational ‘potential energy’.

So the larger gravitational whole ‘extracts’ the thermal energy and transforms it through the dual singularity/curved membrane of a mass system.

The process of ‘freezing out’ and predating on thermal energy at the lower quantum scale, which we have treated above when considering Planck’s analysis, from a s-st-t perspective appears now from the scalar view as an ‘inside out’ ’emerging’ process, where the disorder of thermal energy and Kb quanta is now caused by the ’emergence’ as ‘chaotic, individual, free units’ of the H-quanta of action, which no longer are a smooth, inner continuous ‘invisible’ support for the Kb quanta in harmonic collective behaviour but appear as distinguishable ‘quantifiable units’, and hence suppress-disorganize the upper thermal scale, which simply disappears…. as K=∑h and T=∑ƒ, that is ‘Bolts’ (Boltzman constants of action-entropy) become ‘Plancktons’ and temperatures ‘frequencies’.

This somehow physicists intuitively understand as they translate temperatures into frequencies, reason why they talk of thousands of million ‘impossible’ degrees in particle collisions (using the frequency translation).

In both cases though the result is the same, temperature no longer is the parameter to measure time frequencies (masses or wave frequencies are) and K bolts stop being the measure of action (speed or h-planckton is).

It must be noticed also that the TT potential entropy due to position or ‘informative energy’ will be easier to ‘transform’ into the lower scale of informative, angular momentum – Plancktons – than the kinetic energy, of motion, naturally related to the upper scale of higher entropy-motion.

So we observe that mass feeds on motion and ‘quanta’ feeds on position, since from our human pov, according to 5D metric lower scales process more information and upper scales have more energy of motion (kinetic energy). 

Hence the difference of both equations: kinetic energy is equal to 1/2(mass)(velocity)², whereas mass and velocity can be transferred into each other on the c-limit of scaling between both planes. 

And since temperature is basically ‘motion of molecules’, we see the mechanism of transference of ‘temperature into mass’ at work in its simplest terms. I.e, when comparing two similar entities, the heavier atoms of noble gas xenon have a lower average speed than do the lighter atoms of noble gas helium at the same temperature – mass is taking over speed, but it does so eliminating fast the thermal motion of the being – the key point being that the kinetic energy is quadratic in the velocity.

So NOT all the motion of the being transfers upwards into mass (loss of efficiency of thermal machines), as neither all the energy transfers to the lower ‘planckton’ scale, (zeroth law of thermodynamics), ultimately meaning that neither motion nor the ∆-scales of reality ever disappear in the immortal Universe. 

Now, the limits of the upper bound and lower bound should be obvious in its inverse nature to the reader, as physicists do translate the loss of temperature into an increase of frequency in the quantum real, which goes up to infinity, while on the black hole realm, temperature do really freezes to zero; it is obvious both processes are really inverse: the loss of the thermodynamic ‘scale’, which ‘feeds’ on the lower world of plancktons means a ‘liberation’ of the frequency≈temperature and the release of the stored capacities of quantum systems. On the other extreme however it is the thermal scale the one that ‘dies’ away to feed the grow of the black hole.

Let us then consider the quantum case first – the loss of temperature related energy as it is transferred to the emerging h-quanta, and then the upper bound case – the thermodynamics of black holes, which also reduce to zero temperature, converting thermodynamic energy into gravitational one.

Transition to quantum scale. Radiation – Planck’s law

How the inverse processes happen is the law of radiation. As TEMPERATURE dissipates into radiation, it does so in T4 power law, showing how the system ‘goes down’ two ∆-scales to de as entropy (e=hv radiation); a theme treated elsewhere. It is interesting to notice though that nature is always limited. Beyond 10.000 degrees, 104 we talk really of plasma, an electromagnetic quantum phenomena, hence no longer of temperature. Below 0 degrees we talk of mass… So temperature limits also are limits for the discontinuum between the scales. 0 temperature as in black holes and quarks of perfect order brings a ‘still, SS mind like parameter of ∆+1 mass which emerges to become protagonist. Beyond 10.000 degrees in opposite fashion we enter a regime of ∆-1 quantum dominant electric/magnetic phenomena and temperature makes no sense (in fact physicists translate the ƒ parameter of e=hƒ into degrees; but curiously on the other extreme do NOT use negative temperature numbers as a measure of mass-order, as negative and imaginary numbers that reverse scales or st-ages/topologies are not understood).
A landmark of physics which 5D also enlighten a bit further in meaning, is Mr. Planck’s connection of the ∆-2 scale (relative to the molecular scale) or quantum radiation, with the heat scale, and its reversed processes of death and growth, and usual constants and exponential/logarithmic functions always present in transitions of scales.

A key element of physics is the radiation of blackbodies, which is part of a ginormous number of equations ultimately related to the logistic curve.

What we witness indeed is a ratio, which means a ‘transfer’ of two parameters (one of entropy and one of energy) between two scales of reality, and this is treated as a ‘limit’, in the same way that the logistic curves ‘limit’ the growth in the ‘population’ of a system. So we can compare the equations. The comparison is relevant in as much as the third equation is a population growth limited by a parameter (K, maximal population fit in a system), which cannot be overpassed.

We know the origin of Planck’s law is a case of the Bose-Einstein distribution of equally indistinguishable particles. Quantum theoretical explanation of Planck’s law views the radiation as a gas of massless, uncharged, bosonic particles, namely photons, in thermodynamic equilibrium.

Photons are viewed as the carriers of the electromagnetic interaction between electrically charged elementary particles. Photon numbers are not conserved. Photons are created or annihilated in the right numbers and with the right energies to fill the cavity with the Planck distribution.

Bose–Einstein distribution, the energy distribution describing non-interactive bosons in thermodynamic equilibrium, which is simplified unlike the case of distinguishable molecules which interact with a chemical potential –  zero for the Bose-Einstein and Planck distribution.

So basically photons do not grow because as in the case of any logistic curve of population they are annihilated back into the gravitational quantum potential, ∆-1 field; when they ‘saturate’ the ecosystem – the inner vacuum space-time which in the refurbished model of Bohm pilot wave theory, guides and feeds photons (and electrons), which ‘DO’ feed on them:

In the ‘competitive’ environment of the black body, the saturated radiation dissolves back and so energy does NOT constantly increase but ENTROPY causes the death of light photons.

So following the comparison the ‘limiting carrying capacity’ of an environment, which is given by K, the saturation constant of the ecosystem in the radiation equation is given by nhv/c² in the equation of radiation; which essentially means that for each ‘dimensional sheet of light space-time, c², we ca fit nhv, ‘plancktons’ of energy. And no more. Beyond those limits the photons dissolve in competition for the limited ‘neutrinos’ of  the gravitational scale, they are made of.

There is though an inverse path, as always 3 paths of future, 3 solutions (seen normally as 2 since the conservation of present is the same state, often disregarded), which if you start to be familiar with the ‘ternary method’ you must always seek in stience, as the alternative path of future: the informative solution.

Alas, this is precisely the Bose-Einstein distribution: the indistinguishable particles become a much tighter highly evolved ‘Bose-Einstein condensate’ but for that to happen, the thermodynamic equilibrium must expel the entropy of heat, hence it must go the opposite direction in the ∆±1 variable which we have already defined as temperature.

So you get at frozen temperatures, the Bose condensate, which has this beautiful shape, which indeed looks exactly as the perfect tetraktys of the fifth dimension.

And what about hv/kT. Well if you are following, it is self-evident, the speed or ratio of transformation of temperature ‘bolts’ into the ∆-1 ‘planckton’ frequencies, actions of space/time≈events of the thermodynamic scale which became actions of space-time≈events of the quantum scale.

The equation has in the 3 x3 + 0, multidimensional, multifunctional Universe, a few more perspectives, and encodes many other beautiful secrets in that first constant of Universal constants. 

It includes among other equations, one worth to notice for its beauty and simplicity:

The Stefan–Boltzmann law that states the total energy radiated per unit surface area of a black body across all wavelengths per unit time, j, is directly proportional to the fourth power of the black body’s thermodynamic temperature T: j =σ T4.

As energy falls 2 ‘entropic scales from atoms through particles into radiation: ∆º<<∆-2 – a fact which is derived from the ‘derivative and integral operandi’ used to translate ‘quantities’ between scales of wholes and parts (as per the articles on the meaning of mathematical equations).

But even more beautiful is the constant of proportionality σ, called the Stefan–Boltzmann constant derives from other known constants of nature. The value of the constant is: σ=2 π 5 k4/ 15 c2 h3 =  5.670373…
There you have all the main constants of nature again, and so we finish here, letting you wonder, what is the reason they are  each one dimensionally elevated from 2 to 5 potencies: c2, h3, k4, π5

We conclude comparing the black hole radiation with the previous equation of radiation to further illuminate it:

A simplified analysis, shows both equations to have similar terms above hcˆ3 and hcˆ² and below Kb T, and so without doing an exhaustive analysis of the two forms, one a mere ratio the other a ratio ‘passed over an exponential decay’, they confirm our earlier model of radiation in black bodies: the thermodynamic ∆-scale ‘evaporates’ into the lower ∆-1 quantum scale of frequency radiation.

The differences beyond the mathematical scripture though are relevant:

  • In a black hole radiation is swallowed inward into SS-mass. In the black body is emitted outwards as Energy/ Entropy (B). And so we see once more the inverse relationship between inward masses and outward radiation.
  • In the black hole c is three dimensional, meaning the whole volume of ternary space-time is swallowed. In the blackbody the form is bidimensional, which we shall constantly find explained by the holographic principle: bidimensional sheets of space-time, which write c² are at the core of all formulae of light constants.
  • Finally related to 1) in the radiation what disappears are the excessive photons of the empty space, dissolved into the entropic dimotion of the quantum field of non-local dark entropy (TT, ∆-4), while in the black hole disappear into the evolved ∆+4 scale of top quark masses (the true content of those black holes).

 

ENTROPY IN THE QUANTUM SCALE: THE WEAK AND NUCLEAR FORCES.

∆-1: neutrinos in beta decay. ∆+1: entropic bangs: quasars & dark entropy the nuclear force.

We have established 4 Dimotions of physical systems in correspondence with the 4 forces of nature:

– ∂S-Entropy corresponds to the strong force from the point of view of the larger atom; its inverse ∫T-generation to the weak force; and in between §ð-perception of information to the gravitational vortex and its reproduction to the electromagnetic wave – but alas! the only dimotion physicists truly acknowledge, $t-locomotion does not respond to any of those forces specifically, or rather it is the effect of them all. So we need to study it in more detail to complete the correspondence of the 5Dimotions of exist¡ence and those of Nature. And since it is the ‘saint grail of physicists’, we did consider it in more detail in a previous paragraph.

The entropy function specifically is eˆ-x, as it is the fastest ‘growth function’ (and inversely the constant of decay, in which death jumps over the relative present state and dissolves the being). So unlike the electromagnetic ‘communicative’ force, Q qq/dd, the nuclear force, in its ‘simpler’ ‘first’ deductive version by Yukawa had a simple elegant formulae: F = H*e−λr/r²

The principle involved is that the force carried by particles has to be inversely proportion to the distance squared to account for the spreading of the particles over a larger spherical surface and must also be multiplied by an exponential factor to take into account the decay of the particles with time and hence distance.

This was a complete surprise for all physicists who were seeking as in the Weak ‘transformative, temporal process’ – not a force in space but a transformation in time, the usual equivalent to qq/dd communicative force as they have no clue to the first principles behind those formulae.

But what is the ‘decay constant’ H*? To the surprise of all when empirically measured it turned out to be the exact value of the two fundamental constants of the galatom, c, its constant of time-motion-distance and h, the constant of space-informative perception of physical systems, hc… So what moves and decays becoming a ‘pushing’ force is the entropic destruction of particles into its fundamental ‘minimal 5D’ units, h and c…

Of course, today this Yukawa’s simple understanding on fundamental principles, of the nuclear force is ‘passe’ or rather was never realized as the vortices of Newton, we use to extract in the simplest form the Unification equation of forces is ‘passe’ and no scholar would care to understand why they are so precise and simple in its beauty on first principles, but rather would obsess into the little details of the forest, missing the first principles.

Classic entropy is the expansive, disordered, ‘lineal, dimotion’ of temperature. But it only acts in the scale of temperatures of the Universe, as it was defined studying Gas – by definition, the entropic, expansive dimotion of temperature; inverse to the dimotion of crystal solids, or cold temperatures that in fact reduces the entropy of a system. While symmetry, crystal formation is the cold, implosive, ordered dimotion.

In terms of mathematical physics it means to dilate the spatial simultaneity (different paths) and reduce the temporal causality (Markowian statistical processes, without memory, as each quanta of time is non related to the next one0. Thus entropy IS clearly the inverse function of informative vortices, where causality in the cyclical motion towards the centre of the vortex is absolute.

So not even in the realm of temperature entropy is a Universal phenomena as physicists dedicated to manufacture weapons and make big explosions want us to believe (nuclear physicists with its big bang theories are the meaning of it all, the heirs of Galileo with his lineal concepts of time, physicists making transport machines and weapons, which are the ones that found the concept of entropy and then decided to expand it to everything else).

The problem is ‘military physics’ have all the power. So physicists of solid states; philosophers of science; theorists of information, evolutionary biologists and all those other people who study all the other clocks of time, and information processes of the Universe have not so much impact   (To be cont’ed)

%d bloggers like this: