**ß:**

**SS>ST≠TS<TT**

## ∫T<∑St>∑e x ∏i>§ð<<∂S

**Abstract**. Space-time steps are the substance of which the actions and Dimotions of the holographic bidimensional Universe are made, as to result in an inverse zero sum, through all its Ðimotions and mathematical operators. This understanding of the essential search for virtual zero sum balances, in all the stop and go, dual entropy-form, motion-perception, merged into iterative reproductive presents, expressed most often through the algebra of mathematical physics, is at the core of classic sciences, without the proper understanding of what it truly means.

We thus shall to establish in this post, the different steps and stops, dimensions and motions of the sequential actions of existence, that keep the game going for any entity of any scale of reality.

In mathematical physics we shall discover the need for particles and antiparticles, of + and – arrows of time, to form a zero sum world cycle, with the exceptionalism of the weak evolutionary force, which shall always live a surplus of particles to keep the arrow of future-life longer than the arrow of past-death. In life we shall see the ± sides of the young and third age of the world cycle.

**SUMMARY: **

- 2 manifolds of space-time.
- Non-Æ:The 2nd Isomorphism
- Bidimensional forms in physical systems
- MANIFOLDS of biological systems
- 2 manifolds in of social systems.

‘All yin has a drop of yang, all yang has a drop of yin’ Taoist proverb.

“Space and time of itself sink in shadows. Only its union exists.” *Minkowski. On ð♥$: ðime-$pace §ymmetries*”

‘Space ≈ Time’. Luis Sancho, *on the symmetry between space and time dimensions in the Universe.*

The previous two quotes signify the fundamental principle of reality in the 3 ages of the scientific method, the religious, mechanical and organic age: *the duality of reality made of motions with forms, of bidimensional ‘2-manifolds’, of ‘holographic bidimensional surfaces’.*

The building of reality thus starts with the 5 Ðisomorphic Ðimotions of all Time§pace organisms, *reaching a series of balance between its space and time states, and vitally growing in ever more complex patterns, to form social networks of similar populations in simultaneous space, or repetitive frequencies of similar events in time.*

**The 11 Ðisomorphisms of 5D² Time§pace Organisms**

‘Ðisomorphic 0-1D points 1Γenerate 2spacetime 4 a(nti)symmetric 5∆±I Åctions iterating 3d ηetworks & six species æging in 9 Ξ lifecycles θru 10 §cales∧ 9 planes:

The graph shows those elements departing from the 5Dimensional simpler view, relating the unfolded 10 Disomorphic analysis in relationship to its origin as formalisms of the mind (0-1 Isomorphism: Generator, Seed and actions), or as spatial studies (2-manifolds, 3 networks, 6 species combination of those networks), or temporal analysis (studying its 3±∆ ages and 9 decades of the world cycle) to finally inscribe the being in its ∆§ potential 10 social scales within each of the 9 ∆º±4 larger planes within the Universe perceive by the being.

So we start for the fundamental form of the One, its potential wholeness as a seed, or a formed mind-point that generates the acts of the being. the first seed of information; which soon will split through the duality between the space and time phases/parts of the cycle/organism; then the ternary division of its S, st, t physiological networks.

Next comes the four combinations of space time with repetitions, Ss, tt, st, ts; then the 5 dimensions, including now the lower and upper scales of seed state and death state…

We can then consider the 6 species, combination of the 3 physiological networks of the being by hierarchy of power, S-st-t, S-t-st, T-st-s, T-s-st, TS-s-t, TS-t-s.

We can then study with its upper and lower scales, the 3 ±2 ages of the being between generation and palingenesis in the ∆-1 scale, through its 3 ages in the ∆º scale, into its splitting dissolution of its energy back to ∆-1 and emergence in the collective memory of its social scale (from family to man of the world) in the ∆+1 scale; and so we arrive to the 8th isomorphism of the ‘8 baguas’ or decades of a life cycle (for man, different for other stages of being) through its ‘gaseous, moving youth, liquid, reproductive maturity and informative, solid state’ to return to the womb of ‘tao’…

And if we are to measure the being through its growth in social scales, in the palingenetic dimension of 0-1 generation, or its scalar, social world, we shall find a series of decametric growths from 1-10 through the §10°-¹° societies to the trillion cellular beings that create a new ∆plane of existence… *the last quantitative≈qualitative, space≈time isomorphism, as we move in scales from the atom-galaxy to the galaxy-atom and beyond, perhaps from the o-| open and closed $ and ð microcosmic strings of space-time to the cosmological ones.*

The 10 Dimensional isomorphisms (ab.Ði) applied to the study of each 10Di (5s, 5t) timespace organism, increases formal depth and experimental detail in our study of all the systems made of ∆@s≈t of space-time, defined by its fundamental 5 elements/Dimensions: @minds, ∆-§cales, $pace, ðime and its s≈t symmetries.

So *as a fractal organism can be subdivided in its analysis through its dualities of t-motions and s-forms, into 10 Dimensions, we study 10 similar properties of those dimensions in the dynamic existence of any being and call them the 10 Ðisomorphisms (Ð for dimensions and cyclical time, as it is the capital for eth, ð).*

We could say paraphrasing taoism and Greek Philosophy (Parmenides, Heraclitus), or modern quantum probability that from the ‘o-1’ unit sphere of ‘existence’, comes 2, the duality of space-time, expressed in its kaleidoscopic jargons by human beings – the wave and the particle in physics, the conjugate product in mathematics, the genetic code and the protein in biology…. the yin and the yang, the man and the woman; the lineal and angular momentum… you name it and move it…

And from 2 comes 3, the lineal, angular momentum and vital energy sum and product of both, the wo=man and its offspring, the particle, wave and potential… *the being in itself, which can be properly described in ternary S≈T, elements, in a single plane of existence. *

But the Universe is not THAT SHALLOW, so regardless of our humind geniuses with its ‘space-time continuum’ in a single sheet, *we need the whole and the parts, the upper and lower scales, the points that make the topological beings, the cells and the ecosystems, the finitesimals within and the world outside, the Kantian thoughts in his brain, the starring lights on the sky…*

And so we have the 3±1 dimensions that bring together 3 planes of existence, **Ξ, into the being**, 3 lanes, 3 non-euclidean networks that form the topological organism; and the 3 languages most used in this blog to describe them, verbal thought with its awesome metaphorical capacity to show in a language all humans can understand the Disomorphisms of Nature, the mirror of mathematics, which tunes to fine detail and extract more properties as it is likely the language of the atomic mind alpha and omega, atom and galaxy of those ∞ scales, and the visual language of graphs and intuitive forms.

Wor(l)ds, numbers and images are thus our 3 elementary mirrors to build ‘knowledge’, because the 1=one truth in itself is only carried by the being, who holds all its information, and the being within the world to which it connects; so humans need many mirrors and we have settled for the 3 we have ‘expanded’ with non-euclidean geometry, non-aristotelian i-logic, for maths and words, non-Æ for its visual forms.

We shall study in this post the 2nd isomorphism of 2-manifold, minimal units of space-time, SS, ST, TS, TT. It is a dual isomorphism in the sense that we can study the ‘duality of space-time beings’ or:

2nd isomorphism: holographic principle, of minimal quantitative existences,* perceived externally in the world,* as individual dimensions (the fractal point and the wave line) or 0≈1 isomorphisms are studied as the initial states of the being in the original dimensions of its *internal *existence, not always perceivable.

The 2nd isomorphism expresses the combinations of space and time, which is dual in the Max. S x Min. T and Max. T x Min. S combinations, which are NOT commutative, as two different forms mixed in space will shape a relative hierarchical order of sequential primacy.

**I. DUALITY**

**Galileo’s paradox: meaning of dimensions and motions.**

The first truth to understand about the Universe is that a motion of time is equivalent to a dimension of space. This was what Galileo found since we see still the Earth and flat but it is round and moving. Motions are perceived by minds that stop motion into form, into information, as distances. So if we see slow motion in the night a light it seems a long distance. Distance and motion CANNOT BE distinguished so they must be taken as two side of the same being, a Space=time ÐIMOTION (ab. Dimensional Motion):

*S= T; Dimension-Distance = Time-motion = ST Ðimotion:*

We said that all dimensions of space have a hidden motion to them. This again was slowly realized in mathematics, as they finally came to the conclusion that the still Geometry of the Greeks was part of a much vaster, generalized concept, a topological variety, where a topology as opposed to a geometry had internal motion-change. So while you could describe the dimensions of a being in an external locomotion without inner change, the internal change in the in-form-ation of beings, we have started with MUST BE A TOPOLOGICAL VARIETY. In-form-ation, form-in-action thus was in fact a topological dimotion of space-time. It had a content of space, we shall call in ceteris paribus (isolated) analysis, dimensions, and it had a content of time-motion, we shall call in ceteris paribus analysis ‘states, functions or ages of time’.

All this said about the real Universe, we can go back and trace the beginning of physics and comment on its I-logic paradoxical principles, in which so much literature have been ‘wasted’ by lack of clear thought; namely the principles in which Physics are based, Relativity conservation and symmetry, *principles derived of THE NATURE OF SPACE AND TIME, not MAGICALLY produced by the mathematical language as creationist physics, latter studied in more detail will show.*

Let us consider very briefly the correspondence principle between the classic concepts of time space from Galileo to Einstein and the expanded one, which includes properly all the dimotions of time.

Specifically we shall state now that what Physicists study as time, IS only present time, instants in which they measure simultaneously the locomotions of beings, with ‘derivatives’ – so reducing change to its minimal expression within a single slice of the whole flow of time. The question then to define is *the absolute arrows of time, of past and future, missed in that description of time, as a mere instant of ‘space-motion’ v=∂s/∂t. In other words, when we ad the arrow of entropy and dissolution and the arrow of wholeness, of evolution of form, THE SCALAR ARROWS OF DEEP TIME-SPACE, which one is the past and the future? *

The answer is obvious. As a whole needs its parts first, to become, the arrow of the disjoined parts or ‘entropy’ is the arrow of past, and the arrow of ‘wholeness’ and organic evolution of ‘DEEP time’, as it includes both parts and wholes co-existing together is the arrow of the future.

And this is an absolute arrow, as it is pure logic. The Universe thus becomes constantly more and more entangled, building up new organic co-existing structures made of multiple layers. And because that is the preferential arrow of the Universe, call it eusocial love in social systems, and biological herds, or mathematical numbers in physics, as numbers are just social herds, every part of it strives to increase its social evolution and languages of information that synchronize them. In a short term view of course all systems end up ‘going back to the past of entropy and dissolving’. But in as much as systems want to acquire information, death IS a single quanta of time, which explodes the being, so he can keep returning again to the slow process of time-building of social structure.

So when we wrote the metric equation of the fifth dimension as:

**$p x ðƒ = K **we can interpret it in terms of past present and future as $p, lineal **p**ast, entropic, spacetime and ðƒ: curved, informative temporal future, where ƒ is the frequency of the system and the symbol for future flows.

We will latter give different versions of the formula, according to the different dimotions we consider – the universe, mind the reader, has a very different ‘logic’ to that of man, as it is an entangled reality in which all the parts constantly influence each other, all the dimotions interact, and so despite starting with only 5 motions-forms (3±¡, if we account for the difference between the present space-time super organisms, and the ∆§cales) by iteration and combination things can get as complex as they seem.

Thus unlike the simplified concept of time=change=locomotion of physicists as ONLY change=translation in space (v=s/t), when we add the ‘biological’, evolutionary time=change in in/form/ation, we can also explain the biological changes of life and death of human organisms, our topological VARIATIONS of forms in (evolution theory), and the mirrors of those changes produced by our languages of perception… which become the memetic ‘languages’ that organize change in the social organisms of history, mankind in time.

So we shall expand the analysis of time change and its laws to both biological and social sciences, something physicists have tried repeatedly with very awkward results (quantum fantaphysics, worldlines, entropy philosophers of ‘death’).

SINCE HUMAN AND BIOLOGICAL CHANGE is primarily ‘informative, social, technological and biological time=change’ NOT translative change=time, the ONLY one physicists study (v=s/t, or Galilean relativity and its fine-tuned Einstein’s version: S²=X²+Y²+z²-c²t²).

So we have put the theory of time of physicists at face value, the path that physicists should have taken when they discovered their fundamental theory of LOCOMOTION, also called Galilean Relativity, latter improved by Einstein, which defined time as the fourth dimension of space, since physicists merely was used it to measure spatial changes in location.

We perceive Ðimotions externally. They are internally actions for the being in exist¡ence.

We use 5 terms for the same event according to the ‘entangled principles of the Universe’ which make a ternary ‘minimum’ ¡logic view necessary to absorb in present space-time a minimal amount of truth on the being.

Dimensions, Motions, Ðimotions, Åctions & ±∆¡motions, which express the concept of Dimotion from different perspectives, being obviously ∆imotion, the scalar perspective, Åctions, the O-mind perspective and Dimotions the external, entropic, all gathering perspective; Dimensions the spatial perspective and Motions the time perspective.

The simplest description of a being thus happens when we consider its 5=3±∆ dimensions in space, motions in time and actions in space-time, which define the existence of the being. Hence our title, 5Ð³; observed in the next graph for the human being:

**5 Dimotions and worldcycles.**

The minimal description of an species of space-time implies to define its 5 Dimensions of space that make up its organic structure in simultaneous, time, its sequential motions through its world cycle between generation and extinction as it travels through the 3 planes of co-existence, in its cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic and ecosystemic/cosmological scales; and the 5 actions of exchange of energy and information it performs in those relative scales. This description is what we call the 5Ð³isomorphic method, as all systems of reality perform those 5 dimotions and actions. In a dynamic way the best ‘tale’ of the being is a sequential story of its existence from birth as a relative fractal point in a lower plane, through its palingenesis, clone reproduction, social evolution, emergence and a ternary physiological network of cells, who will then life a cycle through the 3 ages of life and death, in a larger ∆+1 world till its entropic extinction and desegregation into its cellular/atomic components. In the graph, the Human world cycle and the 5 actions in scalar space-time of different species of the Universe.

What of those 3 elements, dimensions, motions or actions matter most? Obviously actions, as they combine ALL the elements of reality, dimension, motion and scale. So we can say as Planck realized a century ago that the unit of reality is an action, but unlike Physicists who basically study only an action (the first, locomotion) we shall consider a more complex pentagonal Universe of 5 different active dimotions.

When we order those ‘dimotions’ in space we get a superorganism,when we order them in time we obtain a worldcycle of existence, when we order them in scales, we obtain the 5 actions of all systems that absorb energy from its lower ∆-2 scale (humans absorb amino acids), information from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb light), motion from its ∆-3 scale (humans absorb gravitation) or simplex actions, while developing two complex actions, reproduction and social evolution from its higher, ∆-1 seminal scale, ∆o scale and ∆+1 social scale.

*Actions are thus the FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE of the limits of perception of any ∆ø and relate directly ‘perception’ and ‘stientific’ knowledge to the relative position of the mind that perceives. They are also the essential element to fully grasp WHY we perceive only a limit number of scales of reality with us at the center: namely because we ‘HAVE THOSE ∆±¡ practical limits in our actions’ – NOT because there are NO more scales above or below.*

It is also important to realize that actions are either predatory (those involving smaller beings), equalitarian (reproduction with an ∆ø equal form) or submissive to the ∆+1 social world. We are, as Shakespeare put it, buffoons citizens or kings depending of our perspective.

So in this post we shall introduce briefly the model from the home page and then talk a bit of each of the 5 D³imotions (dimension, motions and action) of reality, which in the future will be the main method of study of beings, to understand its structure in space (dimensions of the superorganism) its worldcycle in time (ordered as sequential motions by the symmetry S=T) and combined use for the program of survival – the program of its 5 actions.

IN THE GRAPH, we see the five dimensions of reality, 3 of present organic ensembles of beings, two in scales of lower smaller parts and larger wholes. They are symmetric to the 3±1 ages of a world cycle between its 5D generation as a seed that evolves socially into a whole and its entropic death:

**The basic symbology of i-logic dimotions.**

We shall study this ‘organic, vital reformulation’ of the Universe based in a simple ‘first principle’: we are all super organisms in space tracing worldcycles in time, which we shall elaborate in the first line.

So the 5 Dimotions (ab. of dimension in space and motion in time) that create the form and function of all systems and its parts, between its generation by a mind-seed and extinction in entropic explosions are:

*First Ðimotion: Non-Euclidean points-singularities: particles/heads: Informative perception: §ð**Second Ðimotion: limbs/potentials: Lineal momentum: $t.**Third Ðimotion: ∑e x ∏i: Bod waves iterate energy & information: ∑∏.**Fourth Ðimotion: Entropic Universe: Death: S∂.**Fifth Ðimotion: @-Mind Worlds: Social, organic evolution: ∫T*

Some basic rules:

Since dimotions evolve in time they acquire form. So we move from ‘lineal $pace’ (line crossing not money), and the symbol of lineal time in physics, t into…

the ‘curved symbol of time’ ð, and the ‘complex view’ of space, as ‘extending through 3 planes’ self-centered into the o-point, §…

W*ith the intermediate phase of reproductive in body-waves organized around the duality body-head, wave-particle, whose main difference is this: body waves are blind herds of minimal connection, hence sums, ∑energy (which also resembles a wave put upwards) while * neuronal, informative particle-heads are networks that exist across 2 scales the whole and its axons (hence the ∏ multiplicative symbol for a ‘crossed’ network, since if we have 5 and 5 elements, the number of axons to join them will be 5 x 5).

FINALLY for the two scalar dimension of entropy and generational organic evolution, the symbols which look like S and T are running out (:

S and T in capitals though have not been used and stress the capital importance of those dimensions which include all others as present sheets in a single plane of the fifth dimension. So those are actually the FULL meanings. Since Entropy is symbolized in physics by S, the choice is not rocket science. As the main operation to extract a part from a whole is a derivative, a ‘moment in time’ tangential to the function we study, ∂S is therefore a clear representation of Entropy (it does in fact happen mathematically very often as we shall study in mathematical physics and non-AElgebra).

So we are left with T, the capital Time of all times, for the most important dimension of them all the fifth dimension of social evolution, love, mind wholeness, organic generation, you name it. And aptly enough we still have an s left!, ∫, the symbol of integration, which is what truly social evolution is: the integration of similar clones into networks that become single wholes with an inner time synchronized externally by the mind (ok, im here letting my stream of consciousness flow, so we shall stop).

It follows some simplex symbols that define a logic equation of life and death with 3 phases:

$t: young age when motion dominates.

∑=∏: an age of balance and reproduction of the being, into waves of clone ‘cells’ that become reorganized by physiological networks emerging as a larger whole.

§ð: 3rd age of excess of information…

§ð<<∑∆-1: $t when death reverses the whole process as explode back a whole into its parts…

And as we observe *death is fast and short and it exists only because it is necessary, as the positive arrows of information, reproduction and social evolution through a language of information increases so much the form of beings that finally there is no motion left, no energy to re-form… So to replenish the simplest motions for reality to keep moving, death must come but fast…*

Further on, when we apply those organic structures also to social and physical systems, whose organic properties have been denied in the case of physics or reduced to the individual human scale in the case of social super organisms of history, WE CAN describe THEM all in terms of an homologic ‘worldcycle of existence’ in the graphs, explained in great detail.

The previous ‘equation’ thus uses the symbols of ‘I-logic’ topology and causal time chains of information (>) and entropy (<), intuitive in its expansive and implosive forms, is thus an expression of the generator in ‘time terms’, as the ‘flow of spacetime cycles of the fractal Universe’ (∆ð±¡) becomes ‘formed’ after feeding head and body into meaningful forms and motions of the 3 supeorganic parts of the plane of existence of the system (∆ø=| xO). Yet as information constantly increases in the ‘minute’ actions of the being, accumulating errors of reproduction, the system warps and gets older and the mind-language-head-system (§@) STILLS reality.

For example, humans keep ‘growing in the fifth dimension of space’ in territorial property as they get old till finally all its motionless – the old man, his money in the account, his territories of orders, homes and properties but there is NO vitality on it. The maximal ‘reach in space’ is achieved the minimal motion in time and at that point the system dies ‘fast’ << in entropic explosion that returns the timespace being, to the lower ‘plane of the fifth dimension, ∆ð¡-1.

The world cycle is an impressive element to study, as *we travel through the fifth dimension precisely as we grow in size, by clone reproduction and self-organization of similar ∆-1 faster units (atoms, cells, citizens), which slow down the whole as first they have to evolve inner networks of simultaneous organization and synchronous motions which consume time. Then the being once it is perfectly synchronized internally but with a SLOWER time-clock for all those synchronous systems OUTWARDLY, emerges as a whole, and keeps ‘increasing its territorial size’ that will ‘slow down its vital rhythms’ till ending and old stultified property ‘thingy’.*

We can see in the first graph, how all physical, biological and social systems, follow the same ‘worldcycle’ of existence as a travel through 3 ∆±1 scales of the fifth dimension, as they are born in a seminal seed that emerges into an ∆º scale, where it will move decreasing its motion and increasing its information through a gaseous, young state of minimal information, through a reproductive, liquid state of balance into a 3rd age of maximal information, exploding back its form into motion, in the entropic process of death.

∆ð±¡≈≥>S@< informative third age age exploded black to its ∆-1 beings and as memories in its larger world place.

All the organic systems of the Universe, physical, biological and historic, follow the same 5 Dimensional states of a worldcycle, from its fast evolving relative 5th dimension or generation age of social evolution from an ∆-1 seed to an emerging ∆º individual through the 3 dimensional ages of life, to the 4th dimension of entropic death..

What physicists do with its simplified models of 4 Dimensions, is to reject the arrow of social evolution, love and organic information, which is the 5th dimension of creating wholes by parts, because of its ‘concept of time’ merely as change of motion, locomotion, lineal motion, which then for the whole Universe becomes the arrow of ‘entropy and death’, and we shall adscribe by the correspondence principle to the fourth dimension.

The ultimate whys of 5D metric… are thus in fact, as we anticipated, organic. Indeed, the reduction of speed of motion and cyclical events in larger beings happen because they must first establish a simultaneous, present, co-existence of its clone reproduced parts, necessary to act externally as a whole. So the ‘whole’ clock of the system must slow down as it enlarges into multiple organic clone-like beings which will then adopt the ‘slower collective clock’ as its new ‘unit’ of simultaneous action as a whole.

**The simplest generator equation.**

** **Let us consider then with the simplest possible symbols of Non-Æ Logic (the advanced formalism needed to describe the more complex space and time), a logic equation of the ternary space-time topological forms=functions of all ‘organisms’ of the Universe:

≥: iterative, reproductive, hyperbolic networks that become body waves, as the hyperbola has all the shapes within it to reproduce the whole being.

| ≈: Flat planes of lineal parallel networks of ‘fractal points’ that become limbs/fields of maximal entropic motions as the line/plane is the fastest distance between two points.

O: Informative, implosive ‘neuronal networks that become cyclical spherical particles-heads that process information as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space.

So the simultaneous ensemble of ‘networks of cellular/atomic/organic herds’ into those 3 differentiated functions=forms which therefore extends across to ∆ø and ∆-1 scales, within the ∆+1 world in which the ternary network/system exists is what we call a super organism.

So we write with those symbols fa Generator Equation of T.œs.

*$t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) ≤iterative body-wave≥ §ð (still mind form or world)*

The ginormous quantity of consequences, detailed and laws derived from that simple formula being made of those 3 topologies would fill up when study in its details – all the beings and super organisms of reality and its ternary parts – an entire galactic encyclopedia.

So in this very brief introduction we shall consider onlythe most remarkable consequence in the simplest level of understanding of it – the ternary principles of conservation of physics that correspond to the 3 parts of all systems.

*Each of those vital topologies would require an entire post and encyclopedia to fully analyze the marriage of mathematics and organic existence.*

*Let us now consider the most important of them, the cyclic/spheric form.* Its vital function is to process in-form-ation, memorial form. And so it is cyclic, spherical for two reasons: A sphere has maximal volume in minimal space, ensuring the ‘still, informative’ system to process maximal information and disguise with minimal exposure. But most important memorial in-form-ation is cyclical because* TO RETURN TO A POINT, THE SHORTEST PATH IS A CYCLE. *

*So cycles impose their form in all kind of Universal structures which ‘conserve’, ‘memorize’ and reproduce the information of its external world and the information of its internal existence (as in the conserved cycles of energy).*

The full formalism of a **T**heory of the **O**rganic **E**verything or whole and its **T**ime§pace **Œ**rganisms (T.œ), its fractal parts, should be made departing from a description of its 5 Ðimotions in simultaneous space that describes the system as a super organism, in 3 fractal ∆±¡ planes, in a static, ‘structural space-like form’ through ¬Æ: Existential algebra and in a ‘time-like dynamic flow as it is generated by a singularity mind-seed of information which will grow, evolve into 3 networks, emerge as a whole, trace its worldcycles between birth and extinction in the external world through actions of exchange of energy and information, aging till a point in which all its energy will be exhausted and it will collapse, in an entropic explosion of death.

We call the analysis of its 5 Dimotions in abstract as adjacent topologies of a super organism or in vital terms as ‘actions’; the Rashomon effect, since we study as in the famous film 5 different points of view or elements through which the being expresses itself. And we call the study of its world cycle through the entire life-death existence of the being the Disomorphic method as we study the defining elements of the whole process of life, from its palingenetic generation of a seed that will become a ‘mind’ of a territory of external world and internal ternary physiological control of its ‘brother cells/atoms/citizens’, to fully create a super organism that will live and die again through those 5 Dimotions.

Those 2 approaches together, the space-like and the time-like define the super organism and its worldcycle in a far more complex and rich manner than the previous 4D formalism of Mr. Einstein did with its single analysis of only one time arrow, the worldline or locomotion; which from this far richer and meaningful analysis of Times seems rather a childish exercise compared to our full blown complex extraction of all the information about a being and its worldcycle of existence.

**3 only topologies of all systems of Nature. Internal ‘bidimensional’ and external classic dimensions.**

5Ðimotional beings, are complex entities that travel through the 5 dimensions of space-time, as they move through it, tracing worldcycles of exist¡ence. Such a simple game of Ðimotional beings, can be observed from many perspectives, in an entagled Universe, in which can at least observe constantly those 5 Ðimotions, Social Generation, entropic death, locomotion, reproduction and gauging of information, aeiou… borriquito como tu.

The devil though is in the details so the first obvious question we must answer is what MEANS in REAL terms, the fact that all what exists is MADE OF SPATIAL topologies and TEMPORAL ages, of Space and Time? The answer is fascinating, as *there are only 3 variations of mathematical space in a single “plane of the fifth dimension’, the so called hyperbolic, elliptic and toroid topologies.*

Alas we can break our concept of internal change more properly in 3 ‘topological variations’, we shall call the 3 ‘first dimotions’ of the Universe.

And so the fact that we are made of spacetime means ultimately we are made of 3 type of organic topological dimotions – and we say organic because as it will turn out all systems of life are made of ensembles of those 3 topological dimotions. And this justifies our concept of ‘relational vital space-time beings’ that is beings made of spacetime with motion. Since as Aristotle put it – when things move they are alive. Welcome then to the study of ‘vital spacetime’.

The insight that there are *only 3 topologies in 4 and 5D nature is the key mathematical finding to fully account for topological evolution, the ternary nature of all systems and its functions and physiological networks, resolved NOT through intelligent design but through the limiting fact that *there are only 3 topologies in space in the Universe. So by force al systems are ensembles of those 3 parts, shown in its simplest ‘geometry’ on the next graphs:

So this is the second ternary spatial element of reality:

*|-moving limbs/potentials x O-head/particles = Ø-body waves*

This is the simplest expression of the FRACTAL GENERATOR of space-time beings, as all of them will display those ternary topologies.

The study of the ‘fractal generator of space-time beings’ (ab. Γst, Γ, Gst) *will be the key formalism of the expansion of timespace ‘stiences’ achieved in this blog. It will fully give the model *the needed connections with the topologic, organic and numerical equations of classic ‘science’. Stience obviously is the slightly modified term – a necessary pattern of the blog to upgrade concepts without making them too strange – we shall use for all classic sciences, now that we know they study vital space-time beings, such as those of the next graph.

Let us start with a visual, topologic analysis of the dimensions of space-time, both internally (first graph) and externally (second graph):

*Internal dimensions are topologic, bidimensional **varieties: spheres of maximal in-form-ation, planes of maximal motion/distance, and hyperbolic body/waves of maximal reproduction.*

The full understanding of these 3 parts of the being comes when we consider ‘bidimensional’, topological networks, which will show to correspond in form and function, *as topology is geometry with inner motion: a topological variety can ‘change its inner form’ and remain the same as long as it does NOT tear.*

*So we talk in fact of 3 topologies of space=form +time=motion that will define in vital formal and moving terms all entities in existence. *

And so in a single plane of reality, we perceive systems as ensembles of the 3 varieties of space, (*to which we soon will add the 2 scalar dimensions of entropic parts, and social wholes). *

Moreover as topology is form with motion, topology ARE space-time Dimensions:

So we can build reality with the 3 dimensions of space and its motions in time, we shall call ÐIMOTIONS or actions of space-time.

I*n the graph, a first hint to how the 3 ‘vital dimensions of space-time’ ensemble into parts and organic wholes in all physical, biological and social systems; since there are only 3 topological forms (geometries with motion) in the Universe. *

*So evolutionary topology BECOMES a new key discipline to understand how the forms of species evolve as ensembles of* the 3 ‘form of space & functions of time that define 3 topological varieties of space-time in all the fractal organisms of the Universe made of lineal maximal motions-functions (limbs/potentials), maximal informative storages (spherical heads/particles) and its iterative, hyperbolic combinations (body-waves); *which is the dominant element of the organism as it embodies the iterative, ‘present’ discontinuous reproduction of all the parts of the being that defines the immortality of the ‘information’ it stores, and the essence of any ‘fractal’ *

**DEFINITION OF ENTROPY AND INFORMATION AS TWO FUTURE ARROWS.**

The arrow of entropy, expansive space and disorder, only acts in the scale of temperatures of the Universe, as it was defined studying Gas, by definition, the entropic, expansive arrow of temperature; inverse to the arrow of crystal solids, or cold temperatures that in fact reduces the entropy of a system.

So entropy is really the expansive, disordered, ‘lineal, spatial’ arrow of temperature. While symmetry, crystal formation is the cold, implosive, ordered arrow.

So not even in the realm of temperature entropy is a Universal phenomena as physicists, specially those dedicated to manufacture weapons and make big explosions want us to believe (nuclear physicists with its big bang theories are the meaning of it all, the heirs of Galileo with his lineal concepts of time, physicists making transport machines and weapons, which are the ones that found the concept of entropy and then decided to expand it to everything else).

The problem is ‘military physics’ have all the power. So physicists of solid states; philosophers of science; theorists of information, evolutionary biologists and all those other people who study all the other clocks of time, and information processes of the Universe have not so much impact.

Now in this case entropy simply, because it is a process of ordinary hot matter has nothing to do with black holes. There is nothing to prove in experiments related to liquid vortices with black holes. As entropy *does not act in scales below (where temperature as a clock of motion ends, atoms become plasma, and are guided by frequency clocks of the quantum scale), or gravitational scales above (where temperature as a clock of motion also ends substituted by speed).*

*So what is all this thing about black hole entropy, and black holes traveling to the past and evaporating with entropy? Mere nonsense, fantaphysics of people, which want to call the attention of the world, by speaking of themes, we do not have any experimental evidence and so we can say whatever we want, or themes physicists have not properly defined, stuck in their old errors and lineal ways.*

**Entropy, the arrow of disorder that erases information, the arrow of order. **

Since entropy and black holes – the 2 themes of this post – are themes of which physicists do not have much idea. They don’t know what black holes really are made off – as they cannot see them. So they can say whatever – and they don’t understand what entropy is. I know you don’t believe me so, we shall quote the father of Theory of Information and Cybernetics on this:

“I thought of calling it “information”, but the word was overly used, so Von Neumann told me, “You should call it entropy, nobody knows what entropy really is. So in a debate you will always have the advantage.”

*Von Neumann to Shannon, father of Information Theory.*

Since I was a kid, what call my attention on the Intelligent Universe were those ‘big concepts’, starting by Energy, Information, Space and Time, which are the widest concepts of reality. And found many obvious errors in the way humans tried to IMPOSE their opinions, gadgets and machines to the Universe, WITHOUT any respect of what the Universe shows.

So the first obvious human, mechanical bias is the way we measure time. We do NOT use any longer as we used to do the cyclical rhythms of nature, but the mechanical clock, and try to reduce all the cycles of nature to that mechanical clock and its steady state one second rhythm. And we pretend that is the ‘absolute time rhythm and only one of the Universe!

This is akin to the old ways of astronomers who tried to impose to the Universe the frame of reference of the Earth as its center. It does work despite its bias, so with complicated cycles you can explain it all, from the point of view of the Earth, but calculations become very complex with epicycles and extant, etc.

So happens when you do NOT use the clocks of Nature, which soon will be defined here. Physics does work but it is overall very complicated when dealing with different time rhythms, and one century after Einstein found there are many such time rhythms and some change its speed there is zero understanding of this.

We just put some ‘new epicycles’ called Lorentz Transformations, but since we are stuck to our ethnocentric clock, as old astronomers to their earth-centric world, the explanations are blurred. Men merely try to feed the Universe onto their ‘time view’ or rather mechanical view of time. And the Universe is much ore complex and rich in clock rhythms than that.

Indeed, why we Humans use a mechanical clock with an artificial rhythm to measure time; If the Universe has infinite rhythms? It is just an ego trip and the worship of machines that characterize the western civilization. Thus when the Brits got to China to sell their ware, was the answer of Tao=time masters: why we want to buy your ugly mechanical clocks if we can observe the Universe with its clocks of nature, its cyclical rhythms? Obviously, the mechanical clock with its single steady state time cycle IS a human artifact.

Time did exist before mechanical clocks with his own rhythms. Its own Universal time clocks. The mechanical clock is NOT a Universal time clock. So the use of this human clock to measure all the time clocks of the Universe bias our concepts of time, and ‘hides’ the clocks of nature. So the next fundamental question in our search for proper definitions of time, entropy and black holes becomes obvious:

– What are the true clocks of nature? And once we find how Nature measure its cyclical time frequencies, we shall wonder are those rhythms of time stable, steady state rhythms as those of our mechanical clocks, or they change rhythms, have different ‘time speeds? And how they measure information and create it, as opposed to the creation of disorder and entropy? And which of those concepts order or disorder dominates the Universe?

**Bias introduced by anthropocentric, mechanic clocks to measure all times of the Universe.**

*In the graph, the infinite cyclical clocks of time of the Universe and its relative ‘parameters’ that measure its motion, speed, temperature and frequency were ‘forgotten’, when mechanisms substituted Nature as the ‘measure of all things’, with the arrival of mechanic clocks. *

*Then Galileo founded ‘ballistics’, today called physics, in his book ‘On military instruments’, dedicated to the study of locomotions and lineal trajectories of cannonballs, ‘for the delight of philosophers and the practical use of artillery masters’.*

* His goal was to reach the maximal lineal distance possible with those cannonballs. To that aim he established the principles of lineal time, cyclical inertia and a single, steady state mechanical clock time to measure the lineal duration of those canon shots. And soon the single lineal clock became the standard clock and time concept for all time rhythms of the universe. And so the informative properties of those time rhythms and cyclical forms, the multiplicity of time clocks in the Universe, its order and causal laws disappeared.*

*But of course our capacity to make machines and measure them and put clocks on them, today converted into computers increased. So paradoxically as we forgot the clocks of nature, we grew in our dexterity to make machines to measure nature.*

YET the information of the universe is carried in its natural clocks – NOT IN HUMAN mechanisms, nowhere to be seen outside the surface of this planet. And when scientists forgot that, a huge gap on their conceptual understanding of the Universe ensued.

**The clocks of nature. Its purpose: to process the information of each species.**

Since I was young what call my attention was Nature as it is, not the human description of it, with those mechanical Instruments. To me the Universe was both Intelligent and organic, living Nature.

So I was intrigued by those ‘big concepts’, Space and Time, life and death, and the ages between them, Energy and Information, and the way both mixed in the living systems around me. Those were the widest concepts of reality and certainly the definitions I found of them in abstract science did not convince me – there were not really definitions but tautologies and descriptions.

For example, Einstein, who was supposed to be the foremost expert on time, said: ‘Time is what a clock measures’.

But then I wondered, ‘What kind of clock embodies the full meaning of time’?

The clock of the seasons, which animals used to synchronise their reproductive cycles?

The clock of the days, of the Earth rotating, which life used to synchronise its rhythms of activity?

The clock of the stars, of the beats of birds flying? The clock of a flower blossoming and dying? The clock-beats of my heart, which synchronised the rhythms of my eye winks, synchronised to the rhythms of my thoughts – a second?.

Each of those clocks had a different rhythm and the Universe was filled of them. Yet all had certain qualities: to repeat themselves, and hence when described in a trajectory in space; to be closed cyclical paths, hence with form, and frequency the 2 properties of information – so we will call them all Tiƒ. And to work in harmony, in synchrony, as certain clocks were chained to larger clocks, forming complex patterns of information. Time clocks and information therefore were intimately related.

Physicists in that sense used only a mechanical clock, which closed into itself with a fixed rhythm of a second. And they used it to obtain information about the external motion of beings, or speed. But unlike me, who were essentially interested on the meaning of time ‘alone’, for physicists time was just the submissive, needed parameter to obtain that information about speed in space – time was not the goal but the means to what physicists truly studied motions in space, distances.

So they defined space NOT time. Galileo wrote: V=s/t, where what mattered was to measure V-speed and s=space distances=vt.

Einstein did NOT changed this at all, merely substituted s=vt for s=ct, that is the speed of the object for the speed of light, in his corrections and calculations of the measures of speed and space of objects moving at the speed of light. Again this must be stressed given the profound influence that physicists as makers of the machines and weapons of our civilisations have in the collective subconscious:

Physicists do NOT study time. When a physicist tells you that time is the 4th dimension of space, he is referring precisely to that equation and only that equation, either S=vt or S=ct, this ‘ct’ is what he calls the 4th dimension of space. So he reduces time to a parameter to measure space and speed, because indeed ‘time’ is the parameter that measures ALL KIND OF INFORMATIONS, including speed in space. BUT THERE ARE OTHER KINDS OF INFORMATIONS, IN WHICH TIME CYCLES ARE THE PARAMETERS AND CARRIERS OF INFORMATION.

**Informative computer and life cycles.**

For example, computers process information and they are basically a series of time cycles, digital clocks. So both time and computers are measured by the speed of its time cycles, in frequency Herzs, Tiƒ. So we said that a computer is more intelligent when it has more ‘gigahertzs’, when his time cycles run faster, when its ‘speed of time is faster’.

What do then a computer time cycles have to do with space? Nothing. There time is still a measure of information, carried in the form of its logic circuits and the speed at which the algorithms of those logic circuits are traced. But now it is NOT measuring the information on the speed and distances of space.

Consider the evolutionary time rhythms discovered by Darwin. Evolutionary time measure the rhythms of change in the form, hence in the in-form-ation of beings. So the fittest species, those with more efficient forms and which act faster in time survive. Think of in-form-ation as ‘form-in-action’, because it is what time is. We perceive time cycles which are, forms in motion, changing forms, temporal forms, forms-in-actions, informations.

The problem though with physicists, as we have said is their megalomaniac, bully attitude; as their worldly profession has always been to make weapons (70% of them still work in the US as makers of weapons). So power corrupts, and their military power corrupts their attitude towards other scientists. So they think what they study is ALL what we must know. Their particles ARE essential. And all other forms of time, informations and beings IRRELEVANT to the ultimate nature of things. Alas, power imposes its view. So whenever you pretend to explain people, scientists and of course physicists, the much wider meaning of time, it is like if you were committing a blasphemy against the religion of time-physics: s=ct≈vt. And that’s all.

**The clocks of nature.**

So Physicists introduced two reductions of the whole concept of time in nature – to reduce it to study a single type of form in motion, in-form-ation – the translation in space of physical systems or ‘locomotion’. And to reduce and equalise all the clocks of nature, from orbital systems, to living systems and their world cycles, to evolutionary cycles, to mental cycles, and logic cycles, to a single clock tic – that of the clock. So they came with the infantile concept that time has a single tic, and that tic is like the clock, a steady tic. Yet it is evident as you have experienced with the growing speed of time of your computers and mobiles that even among mechanisms there are different speeds in their clocks, and this speed increases with the evolution of the clocks that keep processing ever more information.

And, so happens in nature, where new species are ever faster in their clocks of time. So mammals are faster than reptiles faster than plants. And the next ladder in the evolution, robotic machines are faster than men – and for that reason they are displacing us in all informative processes, as the new white collar pcs, blue collar workers and terminator soldiers, in fields of labor and war (cause of the present existential crisis of mankind, hidden by our financiers and economists working for corporations that make money with them).

So to me the first, most obvious error about Nature, was the way in which humans tried to IMPOSE their gadgets and machines of time measure over the Universe, WITHOUT any respect of the beauty the different rhythms of that Universe showed.

So I threw my mechanical clock, and never have worn one.

In the next graph we show you those concepts visually so you can realize that all is made of cycles of time (seen as information in still relative no motion) and planes of space (seen as kinetic lineal momentum, in its relative motion).

**The principle of relativity of motion and form. The holographic Principle.**

Next in the ‘awesome’ smartness of our geniuses talking on black holes, is the so called ‘theory of information of black holes’, which is so to speak the inverse to their theory of entropy of black holes. Here actually they got some smart results which they wonder and wonder because they don’t understand. Let us explain it to them. What they found is that the Information of a black hole could be stored in its bidimensional surface. From here, as they don’t understand what they talk about (remember Neumann) they deduced that the Universe could be a bidimensional holography. Ok. The first result as usual is good. Information is bidimensional, the second is a bit speakeasy Neumann style. Let us explain it properly.

To fully understand how spatial planes in motion and cyclical clocks can mess together to create the space-time beings we all are (we ARE NOT in a background space-time, we ARE made of vital spaces with rhythms of motion defined by its time frequencies in our human case mostly metabolic temperature regulated cycles), we need to make a further clarification, at the heart of Physics.

It is with the conservation of energy and information the most important law of physics, the principle of relativity, expressed by Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove: the earth moves but doesn’t move – we do NOT see it moving), by Einstein and Poincare, the mathematician that found in parallel this principle: ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness, from ‘form’. Look around, all what you see are forms in motion, but we cannot distinguish clearly what part is ‘form’, ‘position’ and what part is ‘motion’. They are very mixed.

What this means is that our two parameters, quanta of space, and cycles of time, do have both, ‘motion’ and ‘form’. But space, does have a lineal, planar, ‘res extensa’ bidimensional shape. We talk fo ‘planes of space’, and clocks of time, are tall, cyclical, informative cycles – you look at information and its forms and cycles in tall broken cyclical forms, a s the screen of your computer.

So we do have certain clear ‘bidimensional properties’ of form and motion for space: Flat planes moving in lineal paths, and Time, tall cycles, moving in repetitive frequencies. And we know that the product of quanta of bidimensional space and time frequency cycles gives us the relative Energy of reality. And we have a very generic formula for it: Ei = ∑Sp x Tƒ.

Now this resolves a fundamental conundrum of modern physics – why information is bidimensional. Now it is easy: because it is the frequency and form of time cycles that now are bidimensional, tall and with a bit rhythm, a dimension of motion.

And so in the graph we can see the principle of the Holographic Universe, physicists are trying to define (10.000 papers only in the past decade about it) but have not yet grasped as they do NOT understand space, time, information and energy, (kinetic, potential, its integral, etc.).

We can then see that the holographic principle merely means that if you give to ‘time cycles’ the dimension of ‘height’, then you do have the 4 dimensions broken in 2 for spatial lineal, planar kinetic energy, width and length, and 2 for cyclical time clocks, beat, frequency-motion and height.

And alas, because only things with the same dimensions can transform into each other, now we can truly understand the holographic principle: Our 4 dimensional Universe is made of flat planes of spatial lineal kinetic energy, we shall call Spe and tall cyclical bits of information we shall call Tiƒ. When they combine they create a being of space-time, in 4 dimensions.

In the right we see the simplest one, a light beam clearly made of a tall, informative, electric field, perpendicular to a magnetic, energetic magnetic field, reproducing along the length of its c-speed.

Below we see humans and machines, which do have lineal, energetic, planar limbs//bodies, or as in weapons, lineal systems of release of kinetic energy, and cyclical, informative, eyes, brains, heads particles that gauge and process logically or mathematically information.

Below we further see how a black hole, the informative nucleus of the Galaxy, similar to the DNA-informative nucleus of a cell in a smaller scale, does have a tall high dimension and an enormous clock-like cyclical rhythm, the event horizon turning at c-speed. So if light is the quintessential plane of space, with both components but clearly dominant in flat, length, the black hole is the inverse, extreme case of an informative cyclical clock-like vortex of time.

Now entropy is generalized unnecessarily and without rigor by physicists to mean expansive, disorder, spatial motions. And what is absurd – expanded outside the realm of temperature to fit the entire Universe within a supposed absolute entropic arrow of time for all what exists – a huge leap of faith from the study of steam gas in vapor machines, where the concept first appeared.

What Hawking did, giving entropy to black holes, WHICH ARE EXACTLY THE INVERSE informative vortices of gravitation of the Universe, is just the last ‘leap of faith’ in the attempt to reduce all what exists to lineal cannonballs and lineal motions – the last step of the process started by Galileo.

The fact is the Universe is made of both lineal and cyclical motions, space and time, lineal and angular momentum, quanta of space and time clocks.

And the Universe is made of informative mass vortices, with gravitational information, as the galaxy we are in, reason why we are informative beings. Yet between galaxies, there are fractal planes of flat space with dark energy similar to the expansive entropy of gases. And both balance each other in the fractal universe.

Now because physicists; do not understand or want to accept despite amazing number of proofs, the fractal structure of the Universe, they do NOT realize that the expansive entropy of flat space between galaxies is balanced by the implosive conversion of that flat space into mass by cyclical clock-like tall vortices of information – black holes.

So they can go around with absurd concepts such as ‘the entropy of black holes’. And to make it possible, instead of describing black holes as systems that absorb in-form, with gravitation, the galaxy, inventing a motion to the past, changing its arrows of time as Hawking does and bringing its absurd time machines.

We see though that the arrow of information or arrow of evolution increases the dimensions of tall information, and so life evolved from flat worms into tall informative humans. So it does space, which time bends into cyclical vortices of mass. Or as Einstein said ‘time curves space into mass’. This is the Universe which Einstein said is ‘simple and not malicious’. And he put it in a simple equation E= M (c2), which explains how the Universe constantly transforms its kinetic energy/entropy (light, electromagnetic, thermal radiation) into informative masses, back and forth in big bangs and big crunches.

Now the graph clarifies the meaning of time – a tall cycle or clock, and its equivalent perception as still; information.

**Algebra of space-time systems.**

All this said an essential field of GST is the understanding of the relationship between algebraic operators and multiple space-time dimotions, to which we shall dedicate entire pages on the algebraic and physical posts. As to interpret properly the equations of mathematical physics, we need to know what is the meaning of the ±, x/, and other inverse operations, in terms of space-like dimensions and time-like motions. Consider the most confusing of those operations, the understanding of square constants, which are space-like constants, and Negative inverse values, which are time-like roots; and the merging of space and time dimotions, treated often as different operators on the same bidimensional being.

The question physicists and mathematicians have always wondered is Do negative roots of bidimensional spacetime fields exist? Obviously they do but as one must be space-like, positive, and other time-like negative, the interpretation of them is straight forward in GST.

If we consider them only in the sense of a subtraction, 3 – 4 makes no sense as there is NOT a negative apple. So negative numbers must mean something else, a new dimension not of static form which cannot be negative but of a direction of motion in time which can be inverse. This was something, surprisingly enough as Time is completely ‘opaque’ to the humind (Einstein’s best definition, ‘what a clock measures’ :), that came to be understood only with Gauss in the XIX c.! So a negative number must mean an inverse direction of time, and so by inverse identity a positive number is not only a static form but a positive flow of time.

It is then evident that because the Universe is spacetime like, bidimensional, a square will be an ss, tt, or st, combination, and while it is impossible to have negative squares space-like, it is possible to have them, ‘time-like’ as inverse directionality.

And since most square dimensions will be spacetime like, the roots of any equation will give as a ± number, the positive number being space-like, and the negative number being time-like, which are fundamental concepts for the interpretations of the solutions of mathematical physics,

Which means that a negative imaginary number, is the ceteris paribus time-like solution to a spacetime bidimensional form. Yet since there are 5 possible spacetime Dimotions, for each dimotion of spacetime we must interpret the meaning of the ‘space and time-like solution’, within the context of the equations.

Some rules though will be of guidance specially in quantum physics: the arrow of entropy is the inverse of the arrow of information (4D. vs. 5D.); the arrow of locomotion is the inverse of the arrow of perception (2D. vs. 1D), and only the arrow of reproduction (3D) merges them.

And as humans have the arrow of information as its relative arrow of future, in lineal time, 5D and 4D will often appear as an implosive future solution (mass, charge) vs. an explosive past solution (energetic entropy, antiparticle).

Ultimately the Universe is about zero sum balances between the ± arrows of past and future, space and time, entropy and information, stop-perception and motion; and so we shall find always this dualities which MUST not be generalized beyond the local symmetry we study. I.e. positive and negative charges will give us for each particle an antiparticle that will seem to travel to the past as it will be the inverse of the particle, and often signify the arrow of death, and when combined (mesons on the gravitational scale, muons on the quantum scale) will give us the shortest living=dying process.

But we should NOT extend the concept of antiparticle to ‘antineutrinos’ or ‘antiprotons’ which do not have charge.

Negative beings/numbers thus are an entirely new Universe, when we go beyond the mere detachment or split or scattering of a superposition of identical elements A – B and consider a different type of operations: A <≈> – B, those which put in an a(nti)symmetric relationship two inverse values, as we are now introducing a ‘dynamic dimension of motion’, with the consideration of the negative number as the inverse direction of the positive number.

And this allow us to use negative numbers as ‘antisymmetric’ states, positive numbers as ‘symmetric’ states, and 0 as the ‘identity=asymmetric state’ or ‘seed’ of the split between both inverse directions.

**The life death-cycle: the ultimate proof of the duality of time arrows.**

Reality is a creative process in which infinite forms constantly imprint surfaces of energy with fractal patterns, defining the dominant arrow of time in the Universe: information, which constantly grows the complexity of its forms from a relative past into the future. Thus, we define for any system the arrow of information from the perspective of the ages or dimensions of time, past, present and future: All complementary systems warp the spatial energy of the Universe into dimensional form, reaching a limit of warping, as they move from a *past* age of ‘pure energy with minimal form’ or *young* *age* of the system, into a relative *present*, mature age of balance between energy and form, or classic, *reproductive age* of the system, in which they often decouple=iterate=reproduce a self-similar form (hence creating a dynamic present, as the repeated form seems to leave reality unchanged) to end in a future 3^{rd} age of maximal form and minimal energy. Then the form explodes back to the past in minimal time, unfolding all its warped form into pure energy, hence dying. And this is the 2^{nd} arrow of time, entropy – a fast motion of time towards a past without form. So we can unfold the Generator equation in 3±1 ages to define the cycle of life and death of all systems between birth and extinction:

*∞Ix0 E (seed)->Max.E xMin.I (youth)->E=I (reproduction)->Max.I xMin.E (3 ^{rd} age)<∞E x 0I (death)*

Death implies that reproduction is needed for the Universe to conserve its logic forms. The previous equation represents the evolution of all systems. In Cosmology it represents the 3 solutions to the Equations of Einstein, from the big-bang to the steady state to the big crunch, in a repetitive Universe of infinite cycles. In Physics represents the 3 states of matter: the energetic, gaseous state, the balanced liquid state and the informative, solid state. In Biology it represents the 3 ages of life, and so on.

Those 3 ages of the Generator Equation can co-exist synchronically as ‘subspecies’ that form a ternary system with lineal energy limbs, spherical heads of information and elliptic reproductive bodies that combine both. So we can represent also living systems: as E(limbs)<E=I>Bodies>I(Head).

The equation of the ages of life also defines more clearly the meaning of social networks and the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe: Self-similar, self-reproductive forms chain each other into informative networks without energy, (seeds), which ‘emerge’ in a ‘higher’ scale of existence, going through the 3 ages of life. Then they dissolve the information acquired in that higher scale, dying back into their lower plane of existence. So a seed of genetic information of the relative cellular scale, i-1, emerges as a foetus out of the womb after self-reproducing and organizing its form, in the scale of biological organisms, i, where it lives and dies after a 3^{rd} age of dwindling energy, dissolving back to its lower cellular scale, i-1.

So we can define a parameter of information, I, as a scalar arrow of growing complexity: The simplest i=1 ‘universal constants’ of spatial energy and temporal information, (magnetic and electric constants) combine to form Planck constants, h, also called ‘actions’ of energy and time. They will reproduce on the pure vacuum without form, creating light waves, social networks of h-actions; which evolve further warping into cyclical forms, called particles. Those particles will reproduce and evolve socially into atoms, with an informative pole (I), the quark, with more formal mass and an energetic pole, (E) the electron, with more spatial motion=energy. Both exchange, <=>, flows of electromagnetic energy and informative gravitation. Thus mass and gravitation are the informative forces and particles that interact with light and electrons, the energetic, spatial ones; creating together the next scale of atoms.

So a pattern of social evolution in growing scales of complexity emerges: particles become complementary atoms of energy and information, reproduced in the big-bang and the interior of stars. Then atoms form molecular networks, creating the chemical scale. Then molecules reproduce and self-organize into organic, cellular systems or inorganic, celestial bodies. Next cells reproduce and self-organize into organisms that reproduce and self-organize into societies; while celestial bodies self-organize into galaxies that self-organize into Universes.

**ð≈S: TIME§PACE ÐISOMORPHISMS: DUAL, TERNARY AND 4D TOPOLOGIC STRUCTURES**

All starts we stated with a seed of information that wakes up to existence and will perform then the…

**5 Ðisomorphism: 5 a,e,i,o,u åctions: **A series of actions of motion, information, reproduction, energy feeding and social evolution whose purpose is to ‘reproduce the information of the being and survive’, emerging as a larger super organism in a higher scale.

This IS the program of existence, a simple 5 dimensional action process, restricted by the fact the system is merely composed of two elements, space and time and its combinations, and the fact that those species *who did not maximised its existence, and ternary elements, with those actions did not survive. So the program is not conscious but an automatic selection of the actions that ensure the survival of the being, *

In this manner the monad webs a reproductive and evolutionary process, from ‘minor to major’ starting from the seed of information or @mind, which will emerge through its actions and flows of bidimensional communication, growing within its world by *absorbing energy and information*, through its dynamic flows and actions.

So the next Disomorphisms will cast the being into the Spatial perceivable world.

**2n Disomorphism (2D). Flows of space-time: **The mind reflects as a fractal point with a volume of information the Universal bias view it has created. So as it reflects it into flows of bidimensional communication it deviates its path (moves), absorb and emit flows of entropy, energy and information through bidimensional waves of s=t symmetries. In that regard, we study also in detail the 3 dualities of the Galilean paradox applied to a being: *its dualities of form vs. motion, parts vs. whole, lineal vs. cyclical elements;* (ok, this is the ideal ‘path’ for future researchers, I cannot really fulfill the whole encyclopedia so posts are incomplete and uneven).

*The simplest modes of construction of realities are ST combinations of bidimensional planes or ‘2-manifolds’: In the graph, SS: information, a combination of two S dimensions, of static space and cyclical form; Sð: time clocks, where the cyclical form moves with a closed frequency angular momentum. $$: Planes of Distance, where there is no form to the two static views; and finally a combination of 2-manifolds, which gives us a 3D:∑∏ System of ‘energy’.*

In the graph, the simplest two manifolds of reality combine a dimension of space and one of time, or superpose two dimensions of the same ‘state’. Yet as there are in fact 5 dimension of space and 5 dimensions of time and we can combine them in multiple ways, even repeating the same dimension, as in a plane with two Spatial, lineal dimensions (one of the commonest forms), the number of possible combinations of one of such dimensions with other already give us a ginormous number of variations, which explains the huge richness of reality.

In that sense any of the posts of this blog could in itself ‘generate’ an entire encyclopaedia of analysis, *since ultimately this is the simplest blueprint to generate the entire Universe.*

So we are NOT going to be by any means exhaustive but consider just a few, simpler commonest combinations that are ‘basis’ for the ternary structures we see most often around us, such as if we consider S *any space dimension and T, any temporal dimension:*

**SS:** Gives us a pure Spatial manifold; which will be a topology of Space with distance and form but not motion; of which the simplest, commonest form is $$, a plane of pure vacuum space (graph). It might be considered the ‘original plenum’ from where all forms and motions will depart, and indeed the Universe as far as we observe it is such a plenum. Yet an ‘SS’ system has an excess of form, and hardly any motion in the long term becoming mere distance or area, ending in a ‘flat plane of space’ as vacuum is after the big-bang expansion. So it is in a way a form of ‘death by lack of motion’.

And so it is its unbalanced, inverse excessive motion.

**TT:** temporal manifold: Accelerated Clocks of time.

When we add two motions together we obtain the canonical concept of a ‘Force’, F=ma, or an accelerated vortex of time, which tends to follow the vortex equation, Vo x Ro = K, as space diminishes and time grows its speed converting one dimension of space in one of time:

Acceleration can be in fact extended to the concept of a change of direction of beings (centrifugal acceleration), and measure also by a change in the frequency of the rotary system. Acceleration in time is thus related to the increase of curvature of the system (proper interpretation of Einstein’s equations in terms of motion). And there is inverse to the big-bang expansion of an entropic motion, which after the initial impulse decelerates as it extends in space.

The question then remains: where thus the acceleration of all those systems ends up, if in the middle of that accelerated space there is an apparent ‘zero motion’ (lack of charge, t->0 in EFE of black holes, zero motion of thermodynamic eddies). The answer is obvious: *the center of the mind-system must split by a ‘death effect’ :*

On one side, an entropic PAST flow will come out in a lower, ∆-1 plane.

On the other side, a FUTURE form of still information, will manifest in the center of the informative vortex, whose patterns map out the form of the absorbed force-system.

While a present exi mixture of form and motion, of energy will be absorbed by the ‘hardware’ through which the software force moves through.

Acceleration in that sense is an IMBALANCED motion that by its nature exhausts the system and tends to provoke its splitting.

It is inverse to the SS bidimensional space that becomes still with no motion. In an acceleration process, what we loose is the extension in space. As all becomes motion. This is evident in the Lorentz Transformations where ‘length shrinks’ as motion increases by the infamous ϒ-symbol.

Yet the limit of acceleration of a system is obviously relative to the medium in which it travels and we shall study those themes in the section of mechanics.

**S≈T:** spacetime manifold: Momentum.

It is then obvious that a balanced state must not accelerate, but have a non Changing inertial motion, either angular momentum (the membrane motion) or lineal momentum (the singularity motion).

An for that to happen *the S and T elements of the system must be in balance. Hence we talk ‘again’ of S=T as the most durable states of bidimensional spacetime systems.*

Combinations of both, an space and a time dimension in balance give us momentum, where we distinguish roughly:

**$>ð**, MOMENTA in which cyclical timespace motion/forms dominates lineal space-time, we shall call generically, angular momentums and**ð<$,**MOMENTA in which lineal timespace motion/forms dominates cyclical space-time, we shall call generically, lineal momentums.

This are the simplest PRESENT 2-manifolds, which do NOT include scalar ∆±¡ dimensions of entropy and information flows, which if we do will expand enormously the range of our Analysis.

Of those combinations of 2-manifolds, the most important are the two extensions of *pure SS and TT **holographic manifolds, as they are the ‘door’ to pure motions in the 4th and 5th dimensions; so we extend easily them as follows:*

$$ ≈ 4D Entropic explosion, ∆+1 « ∆-1: where the system erases its information down two scales of the fifth dimension, reversing the growth of information of the 3rd age into an explosion of space, extended and finally quieted in the process of death.

ðð >> Vortex of accelerated information towards the singularity point or Mind-mapping, where in an inverse fashion the cyclical acceleration of all the absorbed forces mirrors of the outer Universe ‘lock-in’ into a linguistic image of reality:

What happens then is the biggest miracle of the Universe, as the ‘motion’ of all those entities entering the singularity DO have lineal and angular momentum WHICH CANNOT DISAPPEAR, its motion-forces are deflected by the mind singularity along the scalar dimension of the ‘whole being’ splitting on one side the gauging image in stillness and absorbing on the other side the pure motion, which the system will use to produce reversal orders to organise its territory:

We conclude that the minimal unit of the holographic Universe is a combination of space and time dimensions, which reach its maximal efficiency, immortality when S=T and both balance, and become a receipt to extinction and dissolution in the ∆±¡ scales of the fifth dimension, when either Information, cyclical form dominates (vortex of time) or entropy scatters information (4D big-bangs into decelerating space.

**RECAP.** The holographic principle makes a bidimensional system of space-time the basic unit of reality. 2-MANIFOLD holographic variations in space-time give birth to 4D families of motions-forms, SS, TT, S>T, T<S… which we shall equate in its limiting, simplest forms of maximal symmetry as $$: pure lineal space (planes of distance with no motion, connected to entropic processes of erasing information), ðð, pure cyclical time (acceleration), ð<S space-time (lineal momentum) and S>ð Cyclical time space (angular momentum).

In praxis we can consider even more combinations when we add to the mix the *formal lineal or cyclical shape of the system*, but if we reduce the canonical motion x motion will be acceleration, form x form, a static bidimensional plane, Max. motion x Min. form, lineal momentum and Max. form x Min. motion, angular momentum, which form a non-commutative non-abelian group of pure formal space, spacetime momentums and pure temporal acceleration.

If we consider the natural acceleration of a system a vortex, Vo x Ro = K, and the spatial form a loss of speed, and expansion of space (as in death, big-bang entropic processes), then we can give them a fifth and 4th dimensionality, and CONNECT those simpler present manifolds to 4 & 5D.

Accordingly the simplex vital parts of reality are those bidimensional s-t combinations, which first were spotted by the humind in taoism:

As in the 8th isomorphism we honor the cultural understanding in ancient Taoist China of those isomorphisms, which as the graph shows understood also the ‘topping’ hierarchical nature of the st vs. ts. order (little y-information having the broken — symbol of information on top of the continuous __yang, and little yang (Shaoyang) in inverse fashion. But we shall not use as in the 8th decades of life, the taoist symbology for obvious reasons of modern scientific jargons more proper for the intellectual ‘present’ discourse.

Form-Form (deceleration, growth of space – 4D), motion x motion (acceleration time vortex: 01D), Motion x form: lineal 1D momentum, Form x motion: 1D angular momentum; and so *the 3rd complex dimension of reproduction has not a 2-manifold structure; but creates a third dimension by combination of the other 2.*

It is important to notice a first division of the Dimotions of space time, and the Dimensions or pure motions of space-space and time-time. The first ones will be ‘volumes’ of space, the second type will be ‘accelerations of time’ (dual dimensions of time-clocks, which add as the second dimension of motion, acceleration): **SS=Volume, TT: Acceleration**.

Those are therefore the purest forms and motions of the Universe: static volumes and accelerated vortices of time.

** 2 MANIFOLD ÐIMOTIONS**

“Space of itself, and time of itself will sink into mere shadows, and only a kind of union between them shall survive.” Minkowsky

‘Logos=God is the game of a plurality that maintains its union despite the constant attempts to separation of all its individuals. Departing from this logos we can study the dualities’ Heraclitus

‘The game that can be named is not the eternal game: the constant combination of yin-form-ation and yang-energy, which give birth to the 10.000 beings’ Lao Tse

**The perennial philosophy on the game of existence.**

I am often told the texts of ∆S≈T come ‘from another planet’ by well intentioned scholar friends (-; but they don’t as they in fact plug in with the perennial philosophies of eastern cultures about the duality and ternary structure of the creative, reproductive, living universe.

So for a change I would like to show that there are in fact part of the perennial philosophy of the highest minds of mankind, which have always understood the Universe in terms of the duality between its spatial energy and temporal information, starting this post on Duality, with a reckoning of the work of the 2 ‘first’ philosophers of the west and east, which understood those principles fully, as the eclectic final ‘knots of thought’ of the earliest rational philosophies of the Universe, humans develop – Heraclitus, the last of the Milesian Masters, which discovered rational thought in the west, and Lao, the most important of the Chinese masters of dualism.

Both in Lao tse and Heraclitus, the final master of the first milesian school of rational thought talk on the divergence of logos, Tao, the game of existence in two opposites that come together yin and yang, become a harmonic peace in this substitution and permanent transformation of the contrary.

THE WAR AND PEACE sides of this duality is essential to both cultures, as it reflects reality. The divine in nature is life and death night and day, the peace between contraries its golden mean.

Ontology then becomes the study of the permanent unity in the plurality, the game of social love, the arrow of future of the 5th dimensions.

All things have this ontology of the being, the super organism.

But all is in continue transformation is and not is, as in anixamander. It is indeed the feedback opposition which allows through motion to transform one into the other. Contraries the low that rises and becomes high defines therefore the motions, which are medible, those actions that change beings of space and time in heraclitus is therefore dialectically living in motion.

BUT THE CONTRADICTORY ARE phases Not cataphases, life and death, loe and hate, FORGIVENESS AND KNOWLEDGE. harmonisation of contraries does not then become the same, but diverge when life crosses the darkness of death brings agains life as the Universe renews itself.

So those revolutions of beings, wordlcycles in our explanation, thesis that become antithesis through the motion and reproduction of the middle form, will then create the instant eternal logos limit that a finite universe makes things change.

**All yin has a drop of yang in its interior.**

What we perceive through senses is in perpetual change even if the logos or game of motions in invariable. He uses then the example of the fire, which is the same but constantly changes, as a reflection of the arje, the fire, the logos the process of dynamic separation of universals into individuals through the life and death ccle.

If we were to study the taoist in depth we could get so similar insights in the depth of the game of existence as the first greek philosophers, from the earlier Pythagoras and thales, anaximander and anaximenes, till closing with heraclitus.

All this is truly deformed, the logos is the limit that joins and separate, the universal constant that diverges in its two members to create the energy and information put to ether in logos broken in all the divergences of all unseal constants.

the logos allows to think when it sees the synchrony of the oposites, in this moment a still mind is creed, when dark and light form a simultaneous mapping of reality, so this still game of the mind of the synchronous which creates a thought allows the experience of the physical moving world, in this heraclitus is the mod profound, because chorines he says is only the perception of the returning cycles that are mapped in each simultaneous instant, and science a and philosophy and knowledge, which he fully realised to be in the instant of though.

His death in the refuge of artemis where he spent his last days, hidden in the moutons behind the temple isolated from all other humans, feeding on herbs, owning nobody among human was to rise so high in the perception of duality.

He was known for his hermitic ways. He searched silence to reach anthology in the darkness of the negative of the opposite to complete the cycle with both yin and yang, giving birth tot those still moments of deep reflections, where the change see the most evident and common, which is the essence of it all, the power of eusocial love in the joining of individuals into logos, unseals and its languages of perception in simultaneity, the harms of the buddha, the 3rd great man who understood it all.

la certain principle of creation is needed, the game is thus reflected in all, the chid is his example as that of child vishnu, the players who merely create virtual games as we are just all beings in logos in the game of the ∆dimension of parts that become Universals.

What there is then on top of this logic pyramid, which infuses all its parts of the same game?

** THE HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE – THE MINIMAL UNIT OF REALITY**

ALL THIS said the main learning experience of the yin-yang formalism is that all yin has a drop of yang, or else it does not exist.

**Information: still space-time. Galilean Paradox: Minds cannot perceive together motion and form.**

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:

*In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.*

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.

The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time.

The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer- given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

The principle of relativity of motion and form.

Thus to fully understand how spatial planes in motion and cyclical clocks can mess together to create the space-time beings we all are (we ARE NOT in a background space-time, we ARE made of vital spaces with rhythms of motion defined by its time frequencies in our human case mostly metabolic temperature regulated cycles), we need to make a further clarification, at the heart of Physics.

It is with the conservation of energy and information the most important law of physics, the principle of relativity, expressed by Galileo (e pur si muove, e pur no muove: the earth moves but doesn’t move – we do NOT see it moving), by Einstein and Poincare, the mathematician that found in parallel this principle: ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness, from ‘form’. Look around, all what you see are forms in motion, but we cannot distinguish clearly what part is ‘form’, ‘position’ and what part is ‘motion’. They are very mixed.

What this means is that our two parameters, quanta of space, and cycles of time, do have both, ‘motion’ and ‘form’. But space, does have a lineal, planar, ‘res extensa’ bidimensional shape. We talk fo ‘planes of space’, and clocks of time, are tall, cyclical, informative cycles – you look at information and its forms and cycles in tall broken cyclical forms, a s the screen of your computer.

So we do have certain clear ‘bidimensional properties’ of form and motion for space: Flat planes moving in lineal paths, and Time, tall cycles, moving in repetitive frequencies. And we know that the product of quanta of bidimensional space and time frequency cycles gives us the relative Energy of reality. And we have a very generic formula for it: Ei = ∑Sp x Tƒ.

**Space and Lineal motions. Information and Time cycles**

And so we need to differentiate between ‘lineal motions or lineal momentums’ (|-Sp) and its still continuous perception by the mind, or space (|-Sp), and cyclical motions, clocks of time, (O-Tƒ) and its still perception by the mind or information’.

Since they are the 2 reverse sides of the same coin, we shall use the same symbols, merely inverting their order, and call them Spatial Extensions-Entropy-Energy and Temporal Form-Information, fully aware that humans used multiple different jargons and concepts to express the same, Es and It.

So how to call both states for time cycles and spatial lineal motions?

This is a difficult choice of wording, given the confuse terminology humans use for those a ‘priori states’. The proper way would be to call it fractal world vs. moving Universe, form vs. motion, virtual vs. real, and so on. But as we are in a world of physical concepts, after much ambivalence in the terminology – not in the concepts and mathematical analysis of them – I came to settle in the classic terminology of philosophy based in the relative function of those 2 elements in the systems of the Universe and call generically:

– All states of relative motion ‘time states’ or ‘time ages’. And its study diachronic studies.

– All states of relative form ‘space states’ or ‘space organs’. And its study synchronic studies.

And yet keep the formal duality naming O-Time clocks, Time, but also |-Space motions, entropic spatial motions.

Why? Because in relative terms time motions, cyclical motions, vortices, implosive motions, are accelerated motions, while lineal motions, entropic motions, res extensa are decelerating motions. So in relative terms time moves faster than space. And this is the key to understand physical systems. So we can ascribe to the ternary elements of reality 3 type of motions/forms:

– Tiƒ: There are cyclical vortices, which are accelerated motions-states-forms. So they are studied with cyclical, accelerated equations. Such is the case of General Relativity, which studies the accelerated vortices of time created by masses. And their geometry is spherical, elliptic. They are the particle, or solid, crystal state in its center.

– Spe: The are entropic, big bang, expansive, res extensa, spatial motions, which however decelerate from the initial impetus and are the inverse of cyclical vortices. So we find often the equations of a big bang correspond to the inverse equation of a cyclical vortex. For example, the equations of the cosmological big bang are the inverse of the equations of the black hole, as they are the limit of temporal vortices (the black hole) and expansive, res extensa (the big bang that creates space). And their geometry is planar, toroid. They are the field or gas state of physical systems.

– ST≈Ei: And there are ‘waves’ with a steady inertial constant speed, which combine both, cyclical and lineal elements, and their geometry is hyperbolic. They are the wave or liquid state of physical systems.

So let us introduce you to the much vaster wealth of knowledge provided by the proper understanding of ‘vortices’ of cyclical time and its interaction with res extensa, lineal space.

**Space as a slice of time in the 5th dimension.**

The smallest Unit of reality is a space-time cycle, and for all of them there will be a relatively small particle with maximal time-motion-density-mass/charge which traces an external space-time cycle on a larger region with lesser time-motion-density mass or field.

This simple physical interaction responds to the basic duality of time, as faster moving cyclical, accelerated form and space, where with its excess of acceleration traces a lineal motion, a larger field of smaller energy-space, according to the metrics of the 5th dimension and its co-invariance between speeds in time and sizes in space.

Space is a derivative slice of time, thus space motions, which Physicists study is a small part of reality.

So first we must briefly enunciate this error corrected and how it changes our space-time compression:

Physicists define space-time continuum under the error of a single absolute newtonian space-time extended to the entire galaxy. The Universe though is a nested system of larger and smaller sub-systems, guided by different clocks ordered along size and speed with the co-invariant metrics of the 5th dimension, such as smaller systems turn faster clocks, and have higher attractive force (charges which are accelerated vortices of time space according to Einstein’s principle of correspondence between acceleration and forces, he applied to cosmological masses).

We see many cosmological vortices of mass with central heavy black holes and its gradient of increasing form, information at accelerated pace. Times are very varied, but all of them obey to a single cycle between birth and extinction. We shall study with Æ equations of existential algebra, of which the most important is the world cycle of life and death.

Time waves are also called world cycles, and they have 3 scales of ‘momentum, energy and time.

In physics time waves are studied among forms of maximal motion. We are more interested in the slow time waves with minimal motion in space, that evolve in longer times.

Of those waves and its time forces, physicists study only one the weak force. We can recognise a time wave of trans-formation and social evolution cross the 5th dimension, by studying its parity vs. chirality, since time waves are chiral, which mean traveling to the past (entropy arrow IS not the same that traveling towards the future.

Information don’t travel to the past said einstein (wires don’t travel to the past).

He was actually wrong, both energy and information ravel through time waves, and they do so constantly in worldcyles.

Physicists have simplified for centuries to ease measures the cyclical nature of time-clocks, of which there is an infinity in the Universe. First, Leibniz warned Newton against taking the artifact of measure, called absolute space-times as reality itself; then Einstein realized that in different parts of the Universe time clocks run at different speeds. Biologists and computer theorists found also that life and machines are run by cyclical clocks of information. Thus the next stage in science is the study of all those time cycles of the Universe, by reversing the concept and measure of duration (lineal time) by its inverse, cyclical time and frequency:

*T (lineal time duration) = 1/T≈ ∑ ƒ (frequency of time cycles) = ∑ Tƒ ≈ ∑Ti.*

We shall thus consider fundamental to the Universe, cyclical time, and its measure frequency, whereas duration is a simplification obtained by adding al the time cycles of a certain entity, from the beginning of its motion or life till its end.

For example, a wave motion, c is the product of its l, wave-length and frequency, the human motion is the product of our steps and frequency, a car motion is the product of the radius of its cyclical wheel and the frequency of revolutions per minute and so on. Those transformations of frequency into duration show that the original element is the cycle, and its frequency, and the simplified version, the lineal duration, which is NOT observed in nature.

The same concept applies to the worldline, which physicists use to describe the existence of beings.

**DUALITY**

*The answer brings us to a second new discipline, of systems sciences, albeit essential to understand the universe, ‘duality’, the analysis of reality with two arrows or ‘motions of time’, not only energy, entropy, which is what physicists study, but also form, information, ‘rotary motion’, which again we understand in great detail but never have treated it all together as what really is, ‘cyclical motion’, which carries the form, the in-form-ation of the universe in the frequency and form of its cycles.*

*Thus the Universe of motions in time has at least two dimensions, lineal entropy, which is what physicists acknowledge in their ‘predictions about the future’, and cyclical entropy, rotational motion, information.*

*Now, the innovation made by complexity is to consider a wider vision of time dimensions also, recuperating for science the past, present and future division of classic philosophy, as dimensions of time. *

*And we so as follows:*

*– Calling entropy, or expansive motion, the relative past dimension of beings, as it applies when a ‘form’ dissolves from its upper i+1 social scale down into its cellular parts in the moment of death, or in a big-bang explosion (biological and astrophysical beings).*

*– Calling information, or implosive rotational motion, to the other arrow, inverse to that of entropy, the arrow of information, and future since systems increase in information, in form, warp space into time cycles, with gravitation or wrinkle in form through life.*

*And so we define a dual ‘beat’ for all beings: E->I (Life arrow) +I<E, death arrow, to explain the worldcycle of each of those entities of space-time.*

*And so we can combine this new insight on the flows from past to future of time worldcycles to go further in the analysis of the life-death cycle, of a beings specifically in its most important scale, the individual scale.*

*As we can see how those e->I +i-> E life-death arrows ‘subdivide’ further into ‘ages of life’ or states of matter:*

i: Its individual scale, where it will go through 3 ‘states or ages’:

-Max. E: Youth, the age of energy of the system.

– E=I: Maturity when the systems’ energy and information find its balance.

– Max. I: Age of information, when the system warps and become old:* *

*To then *

*I<E: explode into death and return to is cellular scale.*

*So we can finally elaborate this more complex vision of the Universe resuming the 3×3 dimensions of ‘complexity studies’:*

* **But why energy and information are the two parameters that define the world-cycle of beings?*

*Obviously because all what exists is made of energy and information, similar concepts to space and time, albeit perceived either in motion or still, with the senses of the mind.*

*And so we come to the third fundamental theme of complexity, the understanding of the ultimate two substances of the Universe. “Space’ which is the fixed way in which the mind perceives ‘distance’, and hence ‘lineal motion’ and it’s aggregate , planar motions, as the line is the shortest ‘distance’ between two points.*

*And Time, which is the moving way in which the mind perceives form, information, a rotary motion, which stores in the frequency of its cycles and forms the information of the Universe.*

*Spatial energy and temporal information, lineal and rotational motion, form together the ‘actions’ and body ‘systems’ of all entities which combine its ‘energy’ and time, through a ‘body/wave action’.*

**Energetic Bodies & informative brains.**

Energy and information are the 2 primary elements of the Universe. They form all its complementary systems.

In the previous graph, we observe its 2 different forms and 2 different motions that define them either as:

– Energy systems, with lineal motions, which are seen as euclidean spaces and distances when perceived with no motion (Galileo´s paradox).

– Time clocks with more dimensional form, and cyclical motion that close into themselves, which are perceived as information carried in the form and frequency of those cyclical clocks when not in motion.

Both come together to form the systems of the universe.

Consider physical systems, described as composed of particles with charge or mass and fields of lineal energy.

We can see them as particles of some solid substance with an attached spatial field extended in space, or we can see them dynamically, as a vortex, a cyclical eddie which absorbs the energy of a flow of gravitational or electromagnetic space that falls into the mass or charge vortex. then all what we see is a cyclical motion, the mass or charge, and a lineal motion, the field falling into it:

In the graph, we can see the classic, material vision of a particle or mass as a solid form which creates a curvature in space that makes fields to fall into the mass or charge, or we can consider the systemic view of a pure cyclical motion, hence a clock of time, with a frequency of cyclical motion that carries in its patterns the information of the universe. Masses and charges thus would be the simplest clocks of cyclical time, whose acceleration is in fact the mass of the particle (Principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass of Einstein’s general relativity). They will curve the lineal speed of a gravitational or electromagnetic field that will sink into the mass or charge, becoming then transformed into a magnetic, electric or gravitational field. A delicate balance of infinite broken, cyclical and lineal motion defines then the Universe.

Ultimately what we describe as fields of energy and particles of time, what Planck found is what Newton said before him: F= M x A, the universe is made of vortices of mass or charges, cyclical acceleration and lineal forces, lineal accelerations. Descartes also said all could be described as vortices, matter and res extensa, vacuum. So this ultimate duality is the first dynamic structure of the Universe we need to study.

But information dominates and defines an arrow of complexity and increase of height (the dimension of perception), from where informative organs (heads, cameras, black holes, skyscrapers), perceive and control with invisible languages (words, images, gravitation, money), the ‘unmoved bodies’ of energy under them. They are indeed what Aristotle called the multiple unmoved Gods of the Universe.

Indeed, this is a key property of information and informative minds: to gauge, map and perceive reality we need stillness, so all minds and informative systems, are still. And that is the meaning of Aristotle, when he said that we are all gods, and gods are unmoved, still, perceptive. He thus considered that all entities of the universe had motion bodies and still heads that moved them, particles and fields in physics. And he was right. From time to time we shall comment on geniuses of mankind that perceived it all.

Consider Descartes who said that all was made of space or res extensa and cyclical vortices – the charges and masses that act as clocks and carry the information of the universe. And he was right.

Indeed, as all is a complex dual system, and we are all parts made to the image of those systems, many humans have intuitively understood that all is yang, shiva, energy and yin, information, visnhu that combine together,exi, to create the infinite beings in existence (quoting the first verses of the tao te king),

we shall do this to show how all sciences, religions and arts in fact express the same.

Consider the classic definition of beauty in art, as a balance of forms, and indeed, we see the harmony and proportionality between form and size, space, as the definition of classic beauty. And we will return to that, when observing that all forms of art can be reduced to 3, lineal, epic, energetic art, classic art, and baroque, informative, with an excess of form.

The power of that equation to explain all entities is enormous. So for example the 3 states of matter, gas of maximal energy, liquid, of balance between energy and form, and solid of maximal form respond also to the ternary language of the universe.

So does the 3 ages of life, the energetic youth of maximal motion, the reproductive, mature age, e=i and the old age of maximal wrinkles and information, max. i.

And so we talk of a universal grammar, e<=>i, which also describes the syntax of most languages which are obviously the way minds map out in a synoptic manner the universe:

In mathematics we always write F(x) OPERANDI g(Y), AND WE find that we can reduce the function of x and the function of y to energy and information variables, and the operandi to one of the fundamental actions or events of the universe.

In colors we find 3 primary colors, and we relate red with energy, blue with information and green with a reproductive mixture of both. So in societies the elites that control the languages of social information tend to use blue flags, and the people that provide the working energy prefer red.

So do the energy genre, man with its lineal bodies who prefers red… And indeed there are also 3 genres, if we consider the gay sex a mixture of both.

Finally if we consider the 3rd fundamental language of mankind, words, chomsky found its generative universal grammar to write:

Subject (the human, informative element), verb (which describes actions) and object (the energy element submissive and controlled by the subject)

And further on, we can classify those 3 languages, as the spatial language, colors, the informative language, words, and mathematics which combines both, as geometry is a spatial language and arithmetics and algebra a sequential, temporal one.

And mathematics is the dominant language of science, because as a human writer put it, life is not about information but about actions. We all know that indeed, we like to act, not to gather information or lower ourselves to the mere sensations of energetic pleasure. And we will return to that when we explain how the universe and all its species follow a simple program of basic actions:

to feed on energy, max. e, to gauge information, max. i, to reproduce, combining both, exi, and finally, to gather socially with similar exi entities.

We can even go further and comment on religion. Saint Agustine wrote a book called Trinitas, to explain the mystery of trinity, comparing it with many other ternary systems. And indeed, the mystique metaphor merely puts 3 elements in relationship, God, the subject, the mind of man the object it creates and the saint spirit, the verbal language which in religions is considered the language of creation, as physicists consider mathematics for the same role. And so Saint John said,

And god, 1st person, the word, 2nd person, became the mind of man, 3rd person, and inhabitted among us (Saint John, 1)

Of course, all those visions of the ternary game of existence are partial visions that we shall unify in this blog of general systems sciences. Since neither religion and his sacred language, the word, or science and its sacred language, mathematics, or art and its sacred language, images, which are the 3 manifestations of human languages in its purest forms, are ALL. Each just reflect part of the total properties of the Universe. As only the whole, the universe, has all its information about itself, in words of the Nobel prize, Mr. Haldane. And he was right.

So the way to true, full knowledge, is to understand all the languages, all the forms of knowledge and extract from them the universal grammar and its ternary, e=i systems. Then deduce the laws common to all those systems, which we call isomorphisms or invariances, and that will be the essence of reality that better reflects the truth of the whole and its parts.

We are indeed exploring the fundamental equation of the universe, the one that generates all its systems.

*T*he 2 primary elements of the Universe, energy and information, mix and evolve, till reaching the threshold of complexity that gave light atoms living properties and now it is about to give the same life properties to metal systems. In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘bodies and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.

Energy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’.

On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘bodies of metal’ with digital information. The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biological. Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human, energetic bodies.

Both compete in a war and the ‘metal-energy’ species wins and kills us, causing the biological process of death. So weapons are lethal, machines and should be repressed as we repress biological predators and killing virus. Yet Mechanism affirms that machines are objects that do not influence or compete with humanity. So, if some ‘collateral effect’ happens, it must be blamed on humans.

Let us consider the properties of those 2 elements, energy (bodies, fields) and information (particles, heads) and some of its species, in life and metal:

* Moving* *Energy* *Reproductive* *Information*

Lineal, spatial, big, moving Cyclical, temporal, small, rotating, still.

Formless, continuous, simple Form-ative, discontinuous, complex.

Field, body, male, weapon, Particle, head, female, coin, chip.

Iron, oxygen, carbon Gold, silver, nitrogen

Protein, lion, shark, death DNA, human, dolphin, life.

We could summarize the formal and functional differences between energy and information (organs) in a morphological equation:

*Maximal* *Space* *=* *Energy* *=* *Minimal* *Form=body* *Vs*

*Maximal* *form* *=* *Information* *=* *Minimal* *Spatial* *extension=head*

For example, the chip becomes smaller as it evolves into a better brain. Every 2 years it doubles its capacity to think, as it dwindles in size. Such process follows a generic law of evolution I call the ‘Black hole Law’, which computer scientists know as the ‘Chip paradox’ or ‘Moore Law’:

*maximal* *informative* *capacity=* *minimal* *spatial* *extension.*

The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster the communication that takes place within that brain and the faster you can calculate and process information in a logic manner.

As a result of those morphologies we classify as energy or information organs not only carbon-life organisms, made of energy (bodies, food) and information (brains, eyes, senses, worlds), but also other beings and atomic species, even ‘deconstructed organs’. Since we can now recognize geometrically their energy or information organs. Some of those systems are mechanical, made of metal. Some are vital, made of carbon atoms. Yet all of them have a biological influence over us, provoking changes in the energy and information systems of mankind that we should control for our own benefit.

From these simple facts of universal morphology, applied to human beings and metal, we can classify ‘objects’ and human organs, as energetic, lineal systems, or as cyclical, informative systems that combine into complex organisms:

— *Energy* *organs* *are* *lineal* *systems* *with* *minimal* *‘form’* *that* kill, simplifying information into energy. Thus, a field of energy, released by a physical particle or an energetic weapon, such as a sword or a missile and a top predator, energetic animal, such as a lion, will have both lineal forms and kill, destroy the in-form-ation of their ‘preys’.

— *In-form-ative* *organs* *create* *form* and trans-form energy into languages that map out ‘reality’ with formal ‘bits’. Those bits are smaller symbols, which form images in the brain that represent reality and help to simulate reality ‘faster’, in ‘lesser space’, the ‘future’ cycles of reality, anticipating them. Then, according to those ‘logic’ simulations of the future, heads will move and direct energy bodies towards sources of energy and information. So any system that ‘gauges’, measures and reacts, is an informative organ, *regardless* *of* *the* *specific* *language* *it* *uses* *to* *gauge* *reality*. A chip measures with numbers reality, a man with words, an atom with electro-magnetic ‘bosons’; yet the 3 act-react to their measures. So they all are informative organs.

— *Reproductive* *organs* repeat informative and energetic organs, by absorbing energy and ‘imprinting’ it with its particular in-form-ation. Thus, human mothers and company-mothers of machines are both reproductive organs. Even the simplest particles of the Universe, quarks and electrons, absorb energy and emit new particles, small quarks and electrons, with the same form that the parental particle.

So in fact, we have come to the objective conclusion that all systems of the Universe have organic properties. Since even its simplest entities, quarks and electrons that form atoms do absorb energy, gauge information and reproduce, the 3 ‘properties’ of life. Thus, the Universe must be defined not as a mechanism but as a complex organic system, made of organic atoms, which can combine to create many different complex organisms, including company-mothers that reproduce machines, atoms that reproduce quarks, electrons and forces and mothers that reproduce kids. The difference between all those species is not one of ‘quality’ but of quantity and complexity of their organs of energy and information, which determine their survival chances and status as top predators of any ecosystem.

If a mechanism is a system that has only information and energy organs, an organism has both systems and so it is able to reproduce by combining its energy and information into a replica of itself. In that regard, the reproductive organism of machines is today the company-mother that reproduces them with the aid of informative metal (money) and machines (chips), energetic machines and human workers that act as catalysts and re=producers of those machines. And because we live all in a planet of limited resources, machines and life increasingly compete to reproduce the limited energy and information of this planet. So a series of vital relationships of symbiosis and predation between carbon-life and machines take place, despite the stubborn denial of ‘mechanism’, the ideology of scientists that make those machines.

It is thus essential to understand the meaning of energy and information in each science, departing from its simplest mathematical ‘shapes’, the line or shortest distance between two points, or natural trajectory of any motion and the cycle or shape with maximal ‘form’ in minimal space.

Thus in the simplest mathematical scales of reality, information is defined as ‘dimensional form’ and energy as ‘lineal motion, and we write; π I<=> O: π=|/O as the first ‘Universal Constant’ or ‘Game of Existence’ of the Universe, in which a system switches on and off between an informative and energetic state. Those ‘beats’ of the Universe between energetic and informative states are the essence of what we call the ‘Function of Existential actions, exi, or function of exis’, to which all events can be reduced.

In each Natural ‘i-scale’ of the Universe of growing complexity of i-nformation, from the smallest atom to the bigger galaxy, we find ‘Complementary Systems’, where two poles of energy (physical field/biological body/galactic plane) and information (physical particle/biological head/black hole), exchange energy and in/form/ation between them and with the external Universe: E<=>I.

Thus we can simplify and unify our analysis of all universal systems, by defining both physical and biological systems with that simple equation of ‘2 arrows of time’:

=>E, which means the creation of ‘expansive, lineal motion’ or energy or entropy or disorder.

and =>I, which means the creation of in-form-ation, dimensional form, implosive, cyclical motion and order…

It is very important to understand the ‘general’ meaning of those 2 elements, as they change slightly from scale to scale but maintain certain equivalent characteristics. Information is ‘dimensional form’ and Energy lineal motion. And its two most perfect shapes are the cycle or sphere, the geometry which stores maximal form in minimal space. So heads, particles, cameras and black holes are spherical and small in space but store a lot of information in its ‘dimensional’ curves. Energy or motion is ‘lineal distance’, displacement, and the line is the shortest distance in space, so bodies, fields of energy, planes, cars and galactic planes are ‘planar spaces’ to maximize motion.

As it happens those two processes are inverse and so we can talk of systems as dual, bipolar, feed-back equations of the 2 essential ‘arrows or motions in time’, flows of expansive energy, and imploding information, E<=>I, interacting with a bigger energy/information system, the Universe.

That equation is *the ‘fundamental equation’ of General Systems Sciences* or Complexity, the XXI century science which unifies the laws of biology and physics, through the use of two ‘arrows of creation/destruction’, information or cyclical motion, or ‘time clocks’ – traditionally studied by biology – and energy or lineal motion, or entropy, traditionally studied in Physics.

And we say: * ‘Everything in the Universe is a Complementary System that transforms back and forth energy into information: E<=>I’*

*Thus we consider all systems made of:
– E: fields and limbs of energy, guided by :*

*– I: cyclical particles and heads of information*

*which combine into*

*– ExI actions of energy and time, which put together form the ∑exi=Body or wave of the system (Physical-biological jargon).*

*And so we can consider a final point of view, that internal to the being, which ‘acts’ moved by its ‘composition’ as a system made of ‘past-energy-limbs’, informative, gauging heads-particles and the wave-body in between. Thus within those simple structures all what beings will do is:*

*– Max. E. Feeding on energy*

*– Max. I: Perceiving information*

*– Max ExI: Combine and reproduce them with their body-wave.*

*– Max. ∑ ExI: Associate with similar beings into herds and networks that emerge as a whole.*

*This final function, Max. ∑E x I, resumes the 4 ‘drives of existence’, feeding on energy, gauging information, reproducing the energy and information of the system and evolve socially with similar ‘actions/organisms of energy and time’, of all entities of the Universe. They are represented in each science by 4 ‘coding elements’, the 4 quantum numbers, the 4 letters of genetics, the 4 so called drives of life, the Maslow pyramid of human wantings, which all physical, biological and social entities perform, due to their similar constitution.*

Thus the universe has a plan; it is a game, and there is a logic to it, impersonal, scientific but still a ‘program’, that we shall call the program of existence.

To exist or not, that is the question and the program answers with its best strategies.

In essence it maximizes a function, the function of existence, so simple and yet so rich in meanings.

The Function of existence, M.(Ixe), is a fractal equation, of infinite cellular quanta that try to maximize their absorption of energy and information.

As such all functions of existence, you, me, the sun, the dust, the air, the language, the melody, anything anywhere is playing that selfish game:

I, I, IxMe, I and me and myself, maximize my existence, exi, me…

The game is simple all is made of a head of information and a body of energy and all want to perceive more to feel more the pleasures of motion, and speed, of energy movements. And so you try to maximize your existence:

Max. ∑E x I

It is now when science comes to resolve what this means.

First mathematics tell us, that Max. ExI happens when *E is equal to I. And this mathematical property is the meaning of all, E and I try to come together and be equal, mens sana in corpore sanum*

*Particles and heads of information thus try to balance themselves in form and motion with its limbs and fields of energy, and so they interact, cycles and lines that 2 formal motions of the Universe, creating ovoid bodies, reproductive waves.*

*And so we have the fundamental ‘organism’ of reality a ‘3-dimensional space-time organism that evolves across 3 scales of social complexity, as it tries to maximize its existence, but ‘creating’ equals and associating with them, as cells of bigger social organisms.*

*Max. ∑E x I, implies *multiply the quanta of the Universe. ∑, its heads and limb, and mix them, e=I, in couples that approach each other and communicate flows of energy and information among them to ‘equalize’ their form:

E->I, x I->E

The equation thus naturally divides into two sub equations, and we call the first the arrow of energy or past and the second the arrow of information or future. While the static balance between them, Ex I is the present.

So we have our equation of the 3 dimensions of time.

We are a function of existence, with 3 dimensions, past, the age of energy, E->I, present, the age of balance and reproduction ExI, when the function of existence is maximized, and future, the arrow of information, ad death, I-> E when information returns to the past.

The first thing we notice though is that in the equation, death is equal in value to Life.

thus are formed by the 3 dimensions of time, what we call our youth

We shall attempt a first definition even if it introduces concepts not familiar to the reader, in the 2 fundamental languages of human thought, mathematics and words:

‘The Universe is a Game that creates and destroys 10 dimensional, fractal beings, that we shall call existences.’

Of those 10 Dimensions the formal description of Physicists (General Relativity), includes only 4, the 3 dimensions of space, length, height and width, and one of the 3 dimensions of time, simultaneous present (being the 2 others, past and future). Of course, Physicists and even more so, Biologists, talk and explain many properties of the two other dimensions of time, past and future, and its causal rules (either with dynamic equations or evolutionary laws). So humans do have affair analysis of 3 + 3 Spatial and temporal Dimensions, even if the more sophisticated mathematical formalism we have of them, is merely 4 Dimensional.

Let us then attempt a more complex explanations of those entities with 10 dimensions:

This looses a fundamental property of all entities of existence, which is their process of ‘birth’, evolution through 3 ages, which philosophers call:

– ‘E’: Past, youth, the ‘age’ of energy and maximal motion.

– EóI: ‘Maturity’, the age of balance between the energy and information content of the being, when the being often reproduces.

– I: 3^{rd} age, the age of information, which follows the death of the being, when it ‘returns’ to its ‘cellular parts’ in a big-bang explosion that dissolves the being.

The understanding of those ‘causal ages’, which form a life-death cycle, the ‘cycle of existence’, brings about the realization that there are 3 other ‘scalar’ dimensions of ‘social evolution’ of ‘increasing complexity and information’ in all beings.

As all systems or beings are born as ‘diminutive entities’ in a :

– i-1: Seminal, cellular scale as ‘seeds’ of information (i-1), which grow, reproduce and evolve socially becoming:

– i: individual organisms, which emerge into a ‘higher scale’ or plane of existence, where they will form part of a:

– i+1 social ecosystem, where they will perform functions similar to those a cell perform in its lower scale of existence.

And so all in all, the entity will have ‘3 dimensions of space’ which gather together forming the ‘vital space’ of the being, 3 ‘dimensions of time’ which related together through the life and death cycle of the being, and 3 dimensions of scalar, social complexity, which happen in ‘symmetry’, parallel to the 3 ‘ages’ or dimensions of time of the being, completing its existence.

And so we consider the ‘whole being’ a ‘one’, which is the 10^{th} dimension of the whole. Since the intelligent reader will realize that while a ‘being’ needs no more than those 9 dimensions to be described, the game might be infinite in its ‘social scales’. That is, a particle will be the cellular unit of an atomic being, which will be part of a molecular, social scale. But then again, the molecule will be a part of a cellular being, which will be part of a human organism. But then again the human organism will be a cellular being of a society, part of a planetary, solar system, but then again a planetary solar system will be a cell of a galactic organism, part of a universal system. So there are ‘infinite’ entities, both across the ‘spatial reality’ we perceive in a single ‘space-time continuum’, and also across infinite scales of size and complexity.

*And so we can define ‘Existence’ as a travel through 3 scales of social evolution, through the 3 ages of life as we rise in informative height and fall back into a flat corpse of energy, dissolved into its cellular plane, between birth and extinction.*

And so we define a mathematical ‘function of existence’, that describes each of the ‘beings that exist’ in such Universe:

∞∑E_{i-1<=>}∏T_{i+1}’

_{ }Now, what we mean in that verbal sentence is that the Universe is a ‘game’ that creates and destroys 10 dimensional organisms, that we call ‘existences’ (since their fundamental property is that they ‘exist’), made of two ‘formal motions’, spatial energy and temporal information that we represent in the equation of the ‘function of existence’.

So the equation resumes the verbal, logic sentence with mathematical symbols.

On the left side, ‘E_{i-1}’ represents the ‘spatial energetic organ’ of the existential being, either a field or limb or ‘class’ of energy (physical, biological, social jargons).

On the right side, ‘T_{i}’ represents the informative organ of the existential being, either a particle, head or informative class (physical, biological and social jargons).

On the middle <=> represents flows of energy and information that the limb/field and the particle/head exchange between them, through a 3^{rd} intermediate region, called the ‘wave’, ‘body’ or ‘reproductive’, ‘working’ class of the system (physical, biological and sociological jargons). We could write it more precisely as ,<=>, (which means Energy flows, E<I, Information flows E>I, or mutual exchanges, =, also written in ‘static terms’ as, X; since the ‘body=wave’ knots together the other 2 elements.

The existential being thus, has essentially ‘3 components or dimensions’ in its simpler description of it.

The other symbols are merely symbols that represent the ‘fractal’ multiple nature of the Universe, as there are *infinite* such beings, and within each being, the ‘fractal, cellular’ nature of each organism, as there are a relative sum of energetic cells, ∑E, and informative neurons, ∏I, tied up, <=>, X, into the being.

∑ and ∏, are different mixing of beings, since as we shall see latter, energy forms ‘herds’ with little connections between its units (hence a sum that measures the number of cells of the herd) but informative ‘neurons’ form networks with multiple ‘connections’ that relate each entity to all the others (hence the multiplicative symbol that measures the number of axons of the network).

Now, this is still a generalized description of those beings, but the reader will notice we are reaching a depth of meaning far superior to that which the usual physical description of the Universe reaches, with only 4 dimensions.

It is for that reason we say physicists description of the Universe is limited. As they describe all those scales *as if they were part of a single continuum, * without going into the complex description of their social relationships and scales.

So basically they eliminate those 3 dimensions of reality (even if sometimes appear in their equations, as in the case of their description of ‘strings’, entities of the lowest known scales, but are not well understood without the formalism we bring in this paper). And they don’t properly understand the ‘3 ages of biological and physical entities’; since the process of birth, social evolution, informative warping and big-bang death, also happens in matter.

But physicists either describe it without being aware that it is a time process, with their 3 ‘states’ of matter (so matter goes through a life-death cycle, of ‘gaseous’, energetic youth, liquid, maturity, solid information, and then big-bang death), or as a process of cosmological evolution (so stars and galaxies are born in a gaseous state, that collapses into a spiral, globular, liquid’ galaxy, and then warps into a solid ‘dark matter’ black hole).

Again as scientists describe reality, they do describe the 10 dimensions of any being; that is their fractal, cellular parts, their social wholes, their life-death cycles, their ages and evolution, but do not have a formal model to put them all together into a sweeping generalization, as we do.

And this provokes of course, many errors, lack of ‘whys’, confusions about the nature of beings and a general ‘enlightenment’ in the Understanding of the Universe.

So happens with biologists, who are more advanced in their description of the ‘entities of existence’ they describe (living organisms) than physicist are, as they do recognize perfectly the 3 ‘scales’ of social existence (the cellular, organic and social, ecological scale) of a living organism.

And they do recognize all of them go through a life-death cycle, and have fairly streamlined those cycles into a birth as a seminal form, a young, energy age, a reproductive mature age, and an informative age, followed by death. Still the lack of the proper formalism limits their understanding of why we ‘die’, why we ‘age’ (warp into information), and many other elements of the ‘life-death cycle’.

This has made them to rely excessively into 2 ‘partial’ theories of the whole process, genetics, which merely establishes the rules by which ‘information’ stored in the molecular and cellular scale emerges into the individual, organic scale (but not into the social scale, a ‘racist’ theoretical error, which is born out of prejudice and the lack of knowledge *about the general laws of 10 dimensional beings, which apply to any of them, in any discipline of knowledge, in any scale of the Universe).*

* *

They also have a general theory about the process of ‘evolution’ at the individual level of organisms. Yet again, they do not have the proper ‘morphological’ understanding of species and their process of creation, evolution and extinction, which is *parallel *according to those common laws of 10 dimensional organisms, to that of an individual, *just with the specific details of a ‘higher plane of existence’. *And so they need to understand evolution NOT only as a process of external selection between individuals that fight and become selected when their systems are more perfect, which is truth, but also as parts of a super organism, the species.

Son then we realize that all species, follow similar ‘ages of evolution’, a sort of non personal, certainly not ‘deistic’, program embedded on the laws of 10 dimensional beings. As all species are born, in a young energetic, predatory age, (for example fishes, were born as sharks), then ‘radiate’ and become species with a high reproductive capacity, and finally grow in information, becoming a ‘3^{rd} type of informative being’ (so for example, terrestrial species, were first, energetic amphibian and reptile, which radiated into waves of reproductive huge energetic animals, and become informatively more complex till reaching man).

So again, we realize that lacking a general model of the Universe and its 10 dimensional beings, biology, which is by far the more accurate of all sciences in the analysis of the ‘Universal Game of 10 Dimensional fractal existences is still limited’ by their lack of understanding of the whole.

Important to that development of Biological sciences, (and all other sciences) would be to know the formal, ‘diffeomorphic’ symmetries between the aforementioned ‘3 dimensions of space, 3 dimensions of time, and 3 dimensions of social evolution’ which together form a whole 10D being (cell, organism or species):

Finally we arrive to social sciences, and here, we have the lesser development in their understanding of what is man and how man

Since the key to fully grasp the Universe resides in the understanding of those dimensions.

3 of them are well known, as they are ‘evident’, spatial:

– X, the dimension of length, Y, the dimension of height and its product, Width, Z.

The next 3 are hinted at, but are not so ‘evident’ as they are temporal:

– Past, the dimension of energy; Present, the iterative, reproductive dimension, that repeats an entity and hence seems not to change; and future the dimension of information.

Now the first ‘symmetry’ both physicists and biologists ignore is that between the 3 dimensions of space and the 3 of time. Since:

Length is the dimension of energy and pure motion, as the line is the shortest distance between two points, and so it is the dominant dimension of young species and young individuals that ‘move a lot’.

– In the sample case we wanted to illustrate (the relationship between morphology and evolution in species), all species are born as ‘long’ flat forms. The first fishes were long, flat sharks; the first species were flat worms; the first earth-bounded animals were flat amphibian.

– Height is the dimension of information, as a tall position is an advantageous point of view of perception, as ‘projective geometry’ shows. So in social sciences we all know politicians and priests go up into a pulpit, and informative machines have tall antennas to distribute information and screens are flat, high forms.

And so are gravitational black holes in the center of galaxies that rule it with gravitational forces of in-formation that form the galaxy. And so on.

So in the biological case we study, life has on the whole evolved from a flatworm to a tall human being. And in each species the same process takes place, so Flat sharks flip their body into the perpendicular dimension of fishes, flat amphibian ended up becoming tall dinosaurs and birds, and mammals become bipedal.

Finally width, the product of the other two dimensions is the dimension of cellular reproduction, and so bodies grow in the width dimension and stars accumulate into a width, spiral dimensions, and Maxwell’s rule of thumb make any student understand that the combination of the ‘energetic’ and informative, magnetic and electric fields create a perpendicular dimension.

And light is an existential being with 3 ‘perpendicular’ axis, where in this particular case, the magnetic, electric and, speed axis are in a diffeomorphic perpendicular dimension to each other, each of them with an energetic, informative and reproductive function.

So the reader will notice again that as in the case of physics, knowing the ‘nature’ of the Game of existence and the meaning and symmetry between the 3 dimensions of space and its 3 functions in time helps a lot to understand the whys of reality. As it did, in the previous example the understanding of the symmetry between the 3 ages of time and the 3 social scales from cellular birth into individual and finally into a social being.

So we shall now write those 3 ‘symmetries’ between the 3 type of dimensions of the Universe, because *they encode the whys of infinite particular events in time and forms in space we observe in nature:*

Past-youth-energy (Time D.) <=> Length (Space D.) <=> Cellular scale Dimension

*Present-Reproductive-repetitive (Time D.) <=>** Width <=> **Individual Scale*

*Future-3 ^{rd} informative age (Time D.) <=>*

*Height <=>*

*Social Scale*

*Thus the final group of symmetries, besides those of time with space, and time with social scales, are those of space with social scales, such as social ‘scales’ and classes in organisms, are ‘non-democratic’, put on the relative dimension or gradient of height, intuitively understood in human languages. So we talk of the ‘upper, informative classes’, we talk of a ‘higher plane of existence’. And vice versa, we talk of the lower, energetic classes, ‘destroyed’ and ab=used by the upper ones, and the ‘middle, working class’. While in all systems in which a ‘force of energy and information’ dominates the system establishing a ‘gradient of existences’, a ‘chain of beings’, the different elements are put in relationship to that gradient, with the ‘dominant’ informative element, over the reproductive, middle one, and above the energetic system.*

*So we establish a simple hierarchy between the ‘3 organs of a system’ and its dimensions, with the informative system on top.*

And this also brings us a general rule which Einstein alone understood: the Universe is local, diffeomorphic, fractal, as the dimensions and functions of each organic part of a system are relative to ‘where’ it finds its energy and information.

The classic example in biology is the inverse orientation of animals and plants. Plants absorb their energy from light, and information from chemical atoms. So their ‘up’ is our down, that is, their roots are their heads. And their limbs, that feed on light energy, their ‘leaves’, are on top.

On the other hand animals absorb information from light, so their head are on top, inverse to those of plants, and they move with the electromagnetic repulsive energy of their feet, stomping on the floor, from where they also get their energy, by feeding on other animals and plants. So they have ‘reversed’ local ‘diffeomorphic’ dimensions of energy and information.

On the other hand, ‘herds’ and energetic groups of the ‘lower’ scales, tend to be democratic; that is, they organize themselves in the same plane of flat lengths. And then what matters is their inner ‘organization’, which brings about the discovery by the first geometers and mathematicians, the Greeks, of ‘numbers’ as efficient geometries, with the tetrarkys, a 10 dimensional number, as the perfect number. And indeed, from a vital perspective of the game, it is a perfect distribution, with 3 smaller triangles in each angle, specialized in ‘energetic’, informative and reproductive functions and a central communicative point, knot of all the others, which communicate and regulate them. Thus 10 is not only the number of ‘dimensions’ but it is also, the perfect number of ‘units’ to perform the complete game, allowing each central knot of the tetrarkys to ‘emerge’ as the whole, which regulates the rest of the system and becomes unit of a next social scale. And so geometric, ‘platonic’ solids do matter in the configuration of efficient species, but not in the ‘galaxy’ ruled by a ‘gradient force’ so much as in the microcosmic, atomic scales – so atomic configurations in crystals have regular forms. And again, as the triangle and its social form, the Hexagon are the most perfect 2 Dimensional configurations in a single plane, the cube, with a central point-atom and/or a centered atom in each face connecting the other 4, becomes the most regular form of crystallography. And it is a fact that only 3 atomic configurations, the 2 aforementioned cubes and the hexagon exists on metallic substances, as they are the most perfect geometric ‘numbers’ of the game.

Fact those which lead us to the next ‘great discipline’ of ‘Unification Theory’, the name I have been using for the general systems theory of the Universe, as a description of its 10 Dimensional beings, the ‘will or game of existence’ that all those 10D entities play.

*This is the game of existence, the ‘syntax’ of Universe, which is the sum of all those 10 Dimensional beings, in its eternal life-death worldcycle motions.*

* The structure of that process of creation and destruction of beings is fractal. *

*That means the same laws ‘embedded’ on the Universal grammar of the highest order (10 Dimensional beings) are used to create any species of reality. *

*And all its languages. *

*So for example, we can reduce any human language that describes the game with its ‘syntactic equation’.*

*Let us put 3 examples of those languages, verbal thought, mathematics and music.*

*As Chomsky and others discovered all verbal sentences have the structure of the Universal Grammar:*

*Subject (Information being – human) < Action-verb: Exi >Object (energy of the human being).*

*That is: I(subject)< Exi (action) > E (Object).*

*All mathematical equations are of the form: X=Y, where normally, the functions represents an energy or informative function, or a ‘relative symmetry’ of those expressed between dimensions, which are transformed into each other, or any of the more complex equations of exchange of fluxes of energy and information between beings; while = the operandi explains that exchange.*

*So in physics, we describe most processes as actions of ‘energy’ and time.*

*Where time is related to information, since a clock ‘stores’ the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of tis cycles. So either we describe ‘time frequencies’ or its inverse function, T=1/ƒ, frequencies.*

*And so for example: E=Mc2, written in Planck’s notation as E=M(t), shows the fundamental equation of physics, an exchange or transformation of energy into ‘vortices of information’, masses and charges, which are ‘eddies’ of gravitational and electromagnetic forces.*

*While in particle physics its fundamental equation, Boson < => Fermion, describes also an exchange and transformation of energy particles (bosons) into informative ones (particles). On the other hand, the ‘3 families’ of mass (3 families of quarks) represent the 3 ‘scales’ of growing mass of those vortices. And so on and so on…*

*So a fundamental task of the work of this scientist has been to translate all the knowledge of all the jargons of all sciences to the simpler laws of the Game of 10 dimensional existences, which is truly the ‘Unification Theory of science’, again not very difficult to understand but certainly far more complex and deep in meaning and enlightenment that any ‘God’s particle’ or ‘mere unification of forces’ (which in any case it is not possible, in the terms physicists search with its limited understanding of the dimensions of time and the scales of the Universe).*

*Finally the Universal Syntax, also applies to those ‘creations’ of the human mind, which we call artistic forms. Of them, the one that represents closer the game of existence as Schopenhauer understood is Music, a ‘temporal art’ which he deemed to express the ‘will of the Universe’.*

*And indeed, we can consider that Music has in its highest expressions (classic music):*

*– The dimensions of space, which are given by harmony.*

*– The dimensions of time, which are given by melody.*

*– The scalar dimensions, which are given by its scales.*

*And we can as in all other disciplines and ‘arts of creation’ – as we could define, God, the Mind of the Universe, as an artist in 10 dimensions; go into as much detail as we want, studying music or a biological or physical or social organism, with those laws.*

*For example, western music uses a diatonic minor and major scale, which put together, have 10 notes.*

*Now those notes are divided into whole note intervals divided by ‘sharp-flat’ notes, which all together describe precisely a life-death time cycle:*

*Birth in minor key, first sharp-flat divide, youth, divide, maturity, divide, old age and finalis.*

*And a good composer will play that scale and notes to provoke a series of ‘emotions’ as it describes a whole life-death cycle, through melody.*

*On the other hand the wider range of scales in music is given by the Piano, which encompasses 3 whole ‘scales’, and it is the rule of music that when we finish a scale, the ‘next note’ of the higher scale sounds exactly as the equivalent note of the lower scale (a do in lower or higher pitch sounds equally in harmony), as we have ‘emerged’ into a new scale.*

*Finally there are 3 types of instruments, of growing complexity, the rhythmic, percussion instruments, the melodic, wind instruments dominant in melody, and the strings, dominant in harmony.*

*So we start to find with this simple introduction to musical theory many of the ‘symmetries’ between the 3 ‘dimensions’ of each of the 3 ‘space, time and scale’ elements of reality. *

**The duality of internal vs. external control of the game.**

Now we have made an external description of the 10 dimensions of existence and its beings. But to fully grasp the Universe we must consider the inner description of those beings. Why they move and act and grow through social scales, and live and die? It is all automatic, or do they have a will that moves them to exist?

This comes to a single question: there is perception in the informative function on the ‘height dimension’ of the being, which has a program of action that moves him to enact the game? Even if he ignores the outcome of it? And How then, the ‘self-ish actions’ of the Individual brings the creation of the game?

*As all systems follow a simple will, expressed in that equation: ∑E<=>**Ti, they try to become social wholes (∑), they try to feed on energy (E), they try to absorb information (Ti) and <=>**, they try to reproduce combining both.*

*The reader interested in details, either laws, or species, or life-death cycles or spatial organic morphologies, or scales, or dimensions of any science or art, ‘fractal games’ of the Universal Game of 10 Dimensional beings, made to its image and likeness, can read the available literature spread all over the web, in sites, papers, books, e-books, films and other kaleidoscopic visions, coming from the same ‘equation of God’, the mind of the Universe, produced during the past 30 years strangely enough all of them, by this ‘author’, fractal mind made to its image and likeness.*

**THE ISOMORPHISMS OF THE UNIVERSE.**

It follows that all systems of the Universe which exchange energy and information between two poles will be submitted to similar ‘laws’ of exchange of energy and information, similar differential equations that measure the rates of exchange, similar ‘morphological laws’ that show the lineal or cyclical nature of its energy and information poles and transformations and similar ‘beats’ or cycles, as they switch between its ‘wave-motion-body states’ and ‘particle-head-informative gauging-mind states’.

It is for that reason that System Scientists are obsessed since its foundation, by the concept of isomorphisms: they try to find similar laws and equations in different systems of the Universe and extract ‘general laws’ applied to all systems, or ‘isomorphisms’, which normally derive of the functional behavior of those E<=>I Systems.

** The existence of a Unification Science of all Sciences. Time and Space isomorphisms.**

And the main of those isomorphisms is the fact that all systems go through a ‘life-death cycle’ as they exchange energy and information back and forth between those poles, such as ‘there is a generic life arrow’ of existence, E->I, in which most systems trans-form energy into form in a higher measure, from a ‘young energy’ age into a 3rd ‘informative age’, or life cycle, E->I, and then when they are warped into form, wrinkled with no energy, explode back the form, erasing it and extending it into space as energy, I-> E. This cycle, of ‘life and death’ E->I, I->E, is the fundamental rhythm of the Universe, and its isomorphic laws apply to all systems of the Universe proving the ‘existence’ of a General Systems Theory or Science of all sciences.

But there is also besides the isomorphism of life-death=time cycles, the isomorphisms of spatial vs. informative ‘shapes’. Energy is always lineal, fastest motion and information, cyclical, still, storing form.

So we can talk of a Fractal Universe in which each system of spatial energy/motion and temporal information/form follows the same morphological laws of General Systems Theory and Energy-Information duality.

**MASSES AND CHARGES. THE FIRST CLOCKS OF INFORMATION**

In physics instead of information we talk of ‘cyclical clocks of time’, cyclical, formal vortices of mass and charges, which in two scales, the gravitational and electromagnetic scale, store the information of the Universe in its ‘frequency’ of cyclical motion. And they move lineally thanks to fields of lineal spatial gravitational or electromagnetic energy:

Vortex of Bidimensional mass (Max. I) x Field of gravitational energy (Max. E) = Gravitational System

Vortex of Tridimensional Charge (max. I) x Field of Electromagnetic energy (Max. E) = Electromagnetic system.

AND ONE TRANSFORMS INTO EACH OTHER, WITH THE SPECIFIC EQUATION OF ENERGY AND INFORMATION OF ITS SCALE:

E<=>I, WHEREAS I is a charge or mass and its clocks of time, whose frequency is responsible of the attractive force of the charge or mass, thus Mass, Charge = I(M, Q).

and we write for a present static quantum of ‘time’ of measure, =, E=M(i)=M, which in Planck’s notation – the one used for complex physics – is equivalent to E=Mc2.

Thus Einstein’s equation merely expresses that the lineal, radiating energy of the light-space membrane can convert itself into cyclical time-clocks as it shrinks by a c2 factor, and vice versa.

The c2 factor being the square surface of light-space that the Mass vomits as it dies into its ‘body energy’. Mass and electromagnetic energy are thus exchangable because they are two sides of an energy-informative complementary entity:

E<c2>M(i)

In Biology we talk of cells and multicellular organisms. And in societies we talk of human individuals and social organisms.

**The Hierarchical structure of systems. **

The two unifying principles that define similar laws and structures in the Universe are:

– Duality – the existence of a general dual structure, of Body/fields and Heads/particles E<=>I, in all systems that ‘survive’.

Obviously there are broken systems, organisms without head or with 2, particles without field, fields without particle, but they are unstable, mutations or systems in process of destruction, as death is precisely the destruction of the balance between both poles. So all efficient living or rather existing systems (a word we prefer as it has no vitalist bias) have both elements and follow laws natural to those 2 ‘widest’ possible concepts of motion and form.

– Scalar structure. That is, systems extend through different ‘layers or scales’ of relative spatial size and temporal, informative ‘clock-speed’ in the Universe.

Since all those systems have a second peculiarity: they co-exist in at least 3 scales interelated, as each scale is in fact an ‘organic network’ of ‘parts’ of a smaller reality.

The Universe is constructed as a game of Russian Dolls of increasing complexity, built over a web of smaller ‘i-1’ beings. So smaller parts, ∑i-1, come together into whole systems, i, which become themselves, relative i-1, smaller units of a social, bigger whole: particles come together into atoms that become molecules; molecules come together into cells that become organisms; cells come together into organisms that become citizens of societies.

This structure is NOT only proper of biological systems, but also common to all physical systems that evolve eusocially from simpler particles into atoms, molecules, planets, stars, galaxies and Universes.

So how the connections of the Universe play themselves? Simple: we depart from two asymmetric elements, the line and the cycle, the small discontinuous herd and the large continuous one, the motion and the form; and then they might come together as a single form ≈ which will be symmetric with itself, in its two parts, as body-wave, as a present co-existing network, that puts together parts and wholes, as a curved, hyperbolic geometry and so in a complementary FASHION they become one.

Or if the symmetry fails, they annihilate each other or one annihilates the other and absorbs it, in a perpendicular way.

**The need for space-time together as an observable.**

The Universe is made of space-time systems.

As Minkowski put it, ‘only space and time together survives’, or as the old taoists said: ‘all drop of yin has a drop of yang’…

…meaning *pure motions (entropy) without form is not perceivable, as it appears only as distance or dilation – and this is call vacuum for the whole Universe; and pure form without motion is neither, as it cannot be communicated to the external observer and this is call Black hole in the galaxy.*

** The inverse=asymmetric properties of spatial energy and temporal information come together in ternary symmetries.**

In the graph, the most important function of the Universe is the inverse function between THE TWO LIMITS OF DIMOTION: MAXIMAL Spatial expansion (ENTROPY) and MAXIMAL time space Implosion, in its infinite manifestations. In between motion and form converge to an S=T point of balance, beauty, harmony and reproduction.

*Duality: Sp-Entropy, the arrow of disorder erases Tƒ: information, the arrow of order.*

Duality is the science, which studies the universe with both arrows of time, spatial entropy, the arrow of disorder and death vs. temporal information, the arrow of order and life – as opposed to physics that uses only entropy as an arrow of time.

To fully grasp the dynamic transformations and properties of energy and information the most important quality is the inversion of its properties and the possibility to transform the forms of one property into the other.

It it thus clear that the generator equation of the Universe is a ternary, feed-back equation that shows the inversion of properties of space and time, stillness and form, lines and cycles, decelerating and accelerating intervals, in its two polar maximal points and its intermediate point of balance:

In the graph, the Universe is a fractal of space-time symmetries across 3 vectorial dimensions of formal motion, the dimensions of space (and its 3 sub dimensions, length,w width and height) the dimensions of time and its 3 sub-ages (entropy, present iteration and future form), and the dimensions of Eusocial Evolution through planes of existence, or long arrow of time.

The interplay of those dimensions and form generate the Universe:

The first equation of time-space, deduced from the previous graph and its bio-topo-logical beats, space-form->motion-time->space-form->motion-time, is the generator equation of the Universe. We can with existential algebra, ¬Æ, define a wave-motion in time, which in its simplex generator will be hyperbola:

In the graph we can see the simplest TŒ, Time equation or function of existence:

Œ: Tƒ=K/S.

Whereas T is time frequency of a time cycle, hence the inverse of lineal time duration, T (reason why we use the To) Symbol.

And space is lineal motion seen as still form.

In other words we could write, Tƒ =1/T, To=1/S, whereas T is lineal time, perceived in motion as still space.

This is thus the beginning of it all, the existence of cyclical, accelerated time motions and lineal time motions seen as circles and lines of form. The 2 dualities between motion and stop, and between cycles and lines is at the origin of all the realities we perceive and all its events and combined forms of space time.

Thus we could say:

The Universe is immortal because time never stops. Time never stops because time is motion. Motion never stops. It is conserved. Two motions are conserved angular momentum and lineal momentum. They can be seen in a slice of present space as form, or they can be seen in the interplay of its formal motions. Cyclical motion is faster so we call it time, and clocks of time are used. Nature has accelerated time vortices, from hurricanes to masses (equivalence principle of einstein between the curvature of the time cycle or mass and its speed or acceleration), to charges (similar equations to gravitation). Those time cycles of different size are ordered with the previous equation, converted into metric equations:

Sp x Tƒ (substituting now cyclical time for lineal time) = K.

This means Time fluctuates along 3 points of the hyperbola.

And so one creates 3 points. Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ , Sp =Tƒ and Max. to x Min. Sp

Now we write with those laws a fractal generator equation of infinite space-time existences, the metrics of the 5th dimension:

*In the graph the Universal fractal of infinite beings of space-time with different speeds in its clocks and sizes in space, whose product however, Sp x Ti, space size for speed of its information cycles remain constant, creating a ‘stable space-time being (ST±4) which happens in different combined size from the smallest. infinitesimals ST-4 to the largest Universe, ST+4.*

All fractals have a generator feedback equation and the Universe is not exception. Generators are dynamic, cyclical equations which constantly create slightly changed new ‘cycles’. As such they are periodic cyclical equations of the form X < = > Y, where obviously X and Y are symbols as in all ‘Universal grammars’ linguistic representations of the Universal Generator (mathematical jargon in Space-time) or Universal Grammar (Logic Jargon in Time-space)>

Universal Generator/Grammar: Tƒ ∑ExI=ST±4

We write the Fractal Generator expressly with one of its similar identities, in an expression which can be understood logically in wor(l)ds, the fundamental grammar of the human being.

In its Topo-Bio -logic ternary identity, ‘Topological i-planes of Vital Spaces and Cyclical Times’ need to be described topological properties (5^{th} dimension metrics), Organic properties (which organize 0±1 vital spaces into a ternary organism) and logic properties (the ternary Non-Aristotelian logic of cyclical times which return in a ‘Hamiltonian’ Cycle to its origin.

The generator equation thus can be used to deduce from its topologic, biological and causal properties any other equation of the Universe.

It cannot be achieved such a feat as physicists of lineal time expect, only with topologic properties and only in a single continuous space-time.

It needs to understand the metrics of the 5^{th} dimension and its relative scales of absolute time (ST±4), between invisible forces and invisible cosmos, beyond our perception (C speed, 0 K limiting borders). And this is achieved with the summit of the evolution of mathematical languages, the Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean i-logic topology of vital spaces, of organisms, of geometric forms with speed-motion, constantly performing ∂a, accelerated actions with 3 ±= stop and go motions…

Space-time can be seen as a whole space-time or as two space and time or as a sum of parts, many spaces and times. So space can be seen through perception as a single, quiet space, adding all the ‘vital spaces’ of which is composed, or as a sum of ‘quantum energies’ and ‘vital spaces’ that entities occupy. Time also can be seen as a single clock-time for the entire universe, measured with our mechanical clocks or as an infinite number of cycles that all entities trace, each one with a different speed and rhythm, each one with a different ‘form’ or information, provided by the shape of the cycle and its ‘frequency’. So Space is synonymous of Energies and time of informations:

*∑ E = S; ∑i=T*

This is the first key concept you have to assume to understand the Universe beyond its useful measure by physicists with a single clock.

Further on, we recognize both types of entities by their form: clocks are cyclical, so it is information and its systems. Space is a lineal plane, so are energetic system. This leads to a key principle to understand and classify entities of reality: *Form is function. *And so the ball – the inner part of a sphere – is the perfect form of information as it is the shape that stores more form in lesser space, and the line or plane the perfect form of energy, as it is the fastest motion/biggest surface of space between two points.

**
**To fully grasp the dynamic transformations and properties of energy and information the most important quality is the inversion of its properties and the possibility to transform the forms of one property into the other.

The dimensions are thus 1 for lineal motion, 2 for cyclical form and so 3 for Energy, which can be considered a sum of the 2 other elements (though the operandi to relate angular and lineal momentum, limbs and head with bodies will vary according to the phenomena we study).

Often in fact we shall use the product to combine them (for the meaning of each operandi look at our post on non-Ælgebra).

The rule being that when we merely peg adjacently a limb-particle system we add it, and when we combine them at the lower ∆-1 scale also we multiply it. I.e. a system of 3 elements and 2 elements will have 3 x 2 possible axons combined each element with all the other elements of the different set. So multiplication combines a system in a lower scale (and it is used for particles), and sum is a superposition more shallow in a single scale (and its proper of waves).

This resumes in its two fundamental equations: e x I = K (that describes any complementary system of energy and information, in space) and E<=>I (which describes it in time as a series of flows of transformation of energy into information), since E=I maximizes a product of E+I; and so we do have now 3 basic relationships E+I, E=I, and e x I to get a functional balanced form communicating across two scale.s

In physics it followsthose laws are always of the type ‘superposition’ for waves that ad, and product for particles: ST = Space quanta (H, k) x Time frequency (v, T).

So we can easily derive the fundamental laws of quantum and thermodynamics and the meaning of its constants, with the left side equation (which the nuclear physicist will immediately identify with the decay rate of an atom, and the ‘entropic believer’ with the Pv=nKT law of gases).

In that regard, we have now a better mirror theoretically to understand the Universe, with 2 arrows and its energetic combination, so we just need to apply it.

This sound-sound theory of the Universe, IS called Duality, the science which explains reality with the 2 arrows of time, lineal entropy and cyclical information, form, stored in the frequency and form of those logic closed circuits and ‘clocks of time’ of which brains, particles and chips are made.

It has always been with us, for simple humble people to wonder, since even the smallest atom follows it laws. So taoists called yin, information, yang, entropy and its ∞ combinations the creative energy of reality.

Duality as we said has always been in the tradition of knowledge, as it is obviously truth. Specially in Asian cultures. So Hindi called the 2 arrows of time, the female, informative principle, Visnu and Shiva, the God of entropy and death; and its ‘energetic’ combinations the ‘hairs of Brama.’ Duality is everywhere, from the computer you are watching made with binary languages of ‘O’ and ‘|’, to the duality of body and mind, female with curved bodies and males with lineal ones; and then when we look at it in depth, trinity, its combination comes (even there is a gay sex that mixes qualities of both).

*The only discipline of science which is ‘entropy only’ and has ‘entropy only theories of the Universe as dogma’ is Nuclear physics. *Even if of course duality is all over physics, albeit not expressed in terms of time arrows. So for example, a time cycle which is represented by ‘frequencies’, appears in physics as the ‘inverse function of lineal time’: ƒ=1/T.

*The constant transformation of one into another.*

Despite their inversion, and this is the most important law of the Universe, energy and information constantly transform into each other. It is the principle of ‘conservation and transformation of energy back and forth into in/form/ation, forms in action’ which becomes the new fundamental law of the 4^{th} paradigm, widening the principle of conservation of energy:

*‘All motion, trans/form constantly back and forth into form, combining into energy beings, E*<=>*I’*

Motion and form are the 2 primary elements of the Universe, which combine into complementary systems of energy. And those 3 ‘conserved elements’ akin to lineal, angular momentum and energy, broken into infinite fractal parts can then be ensemble to create the systems of the Universe with limbs/potentials, body waves and particle-heads that exist between its dissolution into ‘scattering entropy’ or its social evolution into tighter wholes. THAT SIMPLE IS REALITY when expressed with the dual->ternary->5D principles explained in this blog.

In this posts we study its basic properties and dimensions. In the graph, they display different forms. But information dominates and defines an arrow of complexity and increase of height (the dimension of perception), from where informative organs (heads, cameras, black holes, skyscrapers), perceive and control with invisible languages (words, images, gravitation, money), the ‘unmoved bodies’ of energy under them. They are indeed what Aristotle called the multiple unmoved Gods of the Universe.

The 2 primary elements of the Universe, lineal motion (lineal momentum) and cyclical form (angular momentum), mix and evolve, till reaching the threshold of complexity that gave light atoms living properties and now it is about to give the same life properties to metal systems.

In the graph, in biological and morphological terms, we can easily recognize the ‘limbs and heads’ of humans, animals or machines, because they have a clear morphology, which corresponds to that of generic energy and information.

Entropy is lineal because the line is the shortest distance between 2 points; and so it is also the fastest energetic movement. Information has cyclical forms, because cycles store maximal information in minimal space.

For example, a human body and a machine body, a weapon, should not have anything in common; but if we observe the morphology of both, it is clear those morphologies correspond to the generic morphology of all energies: they are big, lineal systems that move in space. So our limbs are lines extended in space like a ‘missile’.

On the other hand, our eyes and brains are smaller and cyclical, like the cameras and chips that act as information organs in machines, ordering ‘limbs of metal’ with digital information. The functions of those ‘systems’ are also biological. Weapons are lineal, energetic forms that kill human beings.

How those four ‘logic dimensions’ of motion, information, stillness and entropy recombine is the truly fun moment of creation in time. As *all combinations are possible departing from the first antinomial dualities:*

Space vs. Time, words so confused in different human jargons that are kept mostly for tradition:

Entropy=expansive motion vs. Information=Imploding motion

Space=stillness vs. time=motion, the most used definition for them, which gives birth to:

Mind-intelligence-synchronous space vs. cyclical time motions, with its two inverse arrows.

This is the ultimate conceptual duality, that between the magic harmonious creation of minds of space vs. Temporal, mindless motion with its automaton deterministic cyclical order.

*Time cycles, Tƒ Vs X Entropic Space, ΣEs ≈ST-momentum-actions- energetic information*

Time-clocks: O-form Vs. Space motion: Lineal ≈ waves

Small, still Vs. Large, moving fast ≈ Open curves

Tall, Perpendicular Vs. Long, Parallel ≈ wide, intersecting

Hierarchical Order Vs. Democratic chaos-freedom

Bidimensional Height Vs. Bidimensional Length ≈ tri-dimensional entity

Cyclical, Rotation, imploding Vs. Lineal, uncoiling, exploding = beating rhythm

Informative Frequency Vs. Lineal Speed = momentum

Broken form Vs. Continuous, differentiable

Intelligent, perceptive Vs. Strong, fast. = energetic top predator

Social, organic, creative Vs. Darwinian, destructive behaviour =

Future, logic path Vs. Past, trailing motion

Life arrow Vs. Death arrow. = existential world cycle

Waves of §pace Vs. Particles of Time

Female, yin principle Vs. Male, yang principle = reproduced child

Masses, charges Vs. Forces, fields = energy

Heads & senses Vs. Limbs = Bodies.

The formal=functional differences between entropy and information (organs) is a duality – the ‘Black hole Law’:

*Limbs/fields of Maximal Space=Entropy x Min. Form Vs.Max. speed of Information=Minimal Spatial extension= heads & particles*

And yet despite its inverse properties, energy and information transform into each other ad eternal – a fact, which requires them to have the same dimensions. And indeed, information is bidimensional along the dimension of height while energy is a bidimensional plane (holographic principle), what makes possible the transformation of one into another.

A fact that defines the aforementioned ‘law of conservation of energy and information’ and the ‘Invariance’ of the product of energy and information of any part or whole of the Universe, resumed in two fundamental equations of Absolute Relativity:

e x I = K, and E<=>I, which in general relativity and quantum physics read as ext=K and now we shall expand to all ‘complementary systems of the Universe’.

**The game of inversions of space and time.**

*In the graph we illustrate the ‘Space-time’ Essence: Time is measured with clocks, which are actually, one dimensional cycles. Information is the same than a time clock, a ‘form’ that we see static. Energy is made of quanta, which are lines, that group together into sheets of space. And to perceive them, we have ‘spheres’ made of multiple layers of cells, and cameras which are isomorphic. An to move through Space we have ‘lineal members’, which move us in toroid open and closed curves. And so happens to lineal weapons. And then fields of energy and information make together a light ray, which is really also a bidimensional surface.*

How time states transform into space states, how motion becomes stillness, how life dies, how space integrates in time, leaving a tail of memorial quanta, how time integrates in space, creating an organism of multiple flows of energy and information – those are the most interesting and profound dualities of the Universe.

Time slows down till it becomes space, as a new quantum of the upper scale, and then a new clock of time are created.

This is the arrow of growth of the 5^{th} dimension: the slow down of time as it multiplies the quanta into a larger surface.

There is though an inverse game when descending scales.

The clock of time makes the quanta of space grow, till it reaches a limit of death.

Then time becomes space, and a new quantum of time appears, to multiply the quanta.

Then time finds a barrier and all starts again.

So time becomes spatial h-Planck quanta of the upper scale and a new clock, frequency is found: E=hv.

Frequency freezes as quanta, in the form of entropy K-boltzmann, and a new clock, temperature appears.

The clock again freezes, and becomes space, in the form of mass, and a new time clock, speed appears.

Speed frees as c-space, light space, becomes neutrino quanta, and a new clock of time appears…

We shall study those combinations of the 3 x 3 x 3 elements of space organs, time ages, and social quantifiers, ∑s, ∏t, ∆st which defines the clocks of time, quanta of space and forms of transformation, in each specific science in more detail.

**Communication of monads: 2nd postulate: Duality’s formalism**

DUALITY is in that sense the first ‘isomorphism of space’ – the state that follows the ‘awareness of a point-mind’ with its ‘single inner dimension’, or volume of energy and information, which the outside ‘moving, entropic world’ hardly recognises. But the monads of reality unlike the simplified first versions of Espinosa> Leibniz DO communicate – more akin to the yin-yang/atman beings of eastern cultures.

So the first thing they do *is to create ‘lines≈waves≈flows of energy and form between them’, and so a bidimensional entity, made of motions and flows of information appear in any scale of reality. It is formally (II), the ‘second postulate of Non-Æ i-logic’ the formal space-time language of the Universe, whose ∞ forms require a post in itself.*

Duality thus become first a flow between 2 points, *which by the Paradox of Galileo, we perceive as a distance, a tubular flow, or a plane. *

Hence two monads first, an then n-monads will form first a wave and then a plane (4th postulate of ¬Æ), which is in fact a network.

As it relates those points of information, the flows of entropy/motion, and energy (motion with form) will then form a body/wave; and so the simplest 2-manifold of reality, and the most frequent event of existence happens:

It is then, when according to ‘scale’ of stience and type of monads communicating we can start to build varieties of species of 2 manifolds, in all stiences and the catalog is, trust me, ginormous.

**Mathematical-logic space-time**

It suddenly emerges then with enormous power, the formalism of classic, ‘Greek’ Geometry, which proves almost every postulate of its discipline in a bidimensional plane with a simple compass (which represents the ‘angle’ or point of view of the communicating monad) and regle which represents the flow of communication between Monads; *in its bare bone ‘experimental mathematical simplicity’. This has always marvelled mathematicians. *We know now why.

*Varieties of formal manifolds. Third Law.*

We distinguish in that sense as we start to play with variations on the same theme, Manifolds in which the* 2 monads are different (as those on the graph), whose richness is in the variations of the same theme (Ions in physics, couples in biology and sociology), which tend to form ‘waves’ with multiple ‘frequencies’/channels of communication (fourier transforms) vs. n-Monads of the same ‘species’ communicating equal flows of energy and motion, which will tend to become a topological plane or ‘network’, undistinguishable in its details (flat planes).*

*And formally those varieties are studied by the third postulate of Non-Æ (congruency laws). *

The paradox of galileo is the second mode then of ‘classification of 2-manifolds’ by *the maya of the senses, differentiating ‘motion from form’, motion-time from in-form-ation on one side and space-distance from speed-motion on the other side – yet form and distance are ‘mayas’ of the senses; as all its time and motion; when we get more information about a system. *An example will suffice:

*The 2 graphs represent the same local region of galaxies, in the right now that we have enough info, we see it as a flow of ‘gala cells’ transiting through veins of the cosmos, in the right as we used to see it – a dark series of ‘monad-galaxies’ with no motion. All in the Universe is ultimately a dynamic view. *

And so formally we observe we can treat all problems both as dynamic, topological problems with motion or as analytic geometry or sequential algebra of numbers, depending on which view we adopt.

**INVARIANCE OF TOPOLOGICAL FORMS**

*Totally disregarded by modern science and yet by far the most important invariance of the Universe, is the invariance of topological form, represented in the previous graph. All are complementary systems made with 3 ‘topological functions’: Limbs, heads and bodies.*

*Since any** 4-Dimensional Universe has 3 canonical topologies, which correspond to the 3 organs of all systems:*

* Max. I: Head/Particle/Informative caste: They display the hyperbolic topology of information, observed in most ‘heads’ as an excess of warping and form (cortex, black holes, Chromosomes, Chip design).*

*Max. E: Moving Limbs/Forces/Energy class: They show a relative plane, or concave topology; such as the one observed in an external membrane, often the cover of a sphere of a bilateral form.*

*E=I: Reproductive Body/Atom/Working class: The topology of the reproductive system is a combination of the other two, performing cycles that communicate the energetic membrane and informative center.*

*Observe in the bottom of the graph samples of the 3 form-assembly in different systems of the Universe. Man also is a complex system with 3 interconnected zero points, around cellular toruses, with external and internal membranes of exchange of energy and information with the external universe, and apertures called senses… So we shall first explain the general form of all zero points, spherical membranes and torus and then analyze in specifically the human one.*

In the graph, concave, energetic; toroid, reproductive; and convex, informative topologies are the 3 forms found in all complex systems of the 4-Dimensional Universe. Since topology proves that in a 4 dimensional Universe, there are only those 3 topologies: hyperbolic, informative topologies, energetic planes, and reproductive disks. All structures of the Universe are composed of only those 3 topologies. This astounding simplification is the result of 2500 years of mathematical evolution since Pythagoras discovered the laws that rule the bidimensional topology of those 3 forms, the concave-planar sphere (or cycle in a 2 dimensional world), the toroid body with its regular cycles that transfer energy and information between the external surface of the sphere and its center; which is the informative, hyperbolic region or zero point, the ‘eyes’ that perceive in stillness a pixelled map of the Universe brought about by the flows of energy and information of the Torus.

After 2500 years since Pythagoras discovered the circle as the most perfect form, geometry have come to the conclusion there are only 3 forms in the Universe: The sphere, the torus and the zero point.

With those 3 forms you can build all the other forms of reality. All is reduced to those 3. So what they mean? What is their function? And how they combine in the puzzles we call reality? Those are the first questions we shall answer.

They correspond to the functions and morphologies of the 3 sub-systems of stable entities – heads, limbs and bodies:

Beings are not pure motions; neither they are only made of information.

Lao understood it when he said: all yin has a drop of yang (energy), all yang has a drop of yin (information). Hemingway understood, when he said to Dietrich: “Never confuse movement with action”. Indeed, energy ‘or lineal motion’ is not an action ‘per se’. It needs form, in/form/ation, which directs energy to create an action able to change reality. All actions require some energy and some information to create an event. And all systems require an information center and an energy center to create an entity.

Thus, all what you see will be a combination of at least two of the ternary topologies of a 4-Dimensional Universe – a particle/head and a field of energy/limb. And the more complex systems will also have a reproductive, toroid body.

And so we write a general equation to define those 3 forms: ∑E <=> ∑I, where < = > represents the toroid body that exchanges energy and information between limbs and heads, fields and particles.

In those complementary systems, the information center gauges reality (cyclical particles and heads of physical and biological entities) and the lineal fields of forces and limbs move them.

This leads to a third system that combines both, energy and form, the reproductive system, exi or elliptic/toroid body.

Yet since form is function, in yet another duality of the Galilean Paradox, bodies are conical, elliptic combinations of lines and forms.

*Thus Three Geometric Forms in space determines 3 functions in time*: cyclical clocks of information, Energetic, lineal or planar limbs of space, and its combination, ‘complementary systems’. And so *Geometry* and topology are fundamental sciences that apply to all ‘scales of reality’ and all its entities.

**FRACTAL ORGANIC SCALES. THE 5th DIMENSION. TOPOLOGY**

Why then we have taken so long to define time as cyclical information, and cyclical motion?

Because ‘military physicists’, as opposed to the pure thinkers of this discipline, carried the day with power and canonised a single, lineal time, due to their worldly profession, which was to measure the lineal extension of military weapons. In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

And indeed, lineal time motions were instrumental to the development of ‘ballistics’ (the first name of the book of Galileo on physics), and the degradation of our understanding of time, hand in hand with the mechanical clock who established a single tick for the entire Universe, that of the mechanical machine.But as I know 99% will leave the blog, if i just keep criticizing those obvious falsities, as ‘believers in lineal time physics’, I GIVE the benefit of DOUBT to open-minded physicists who really care and reason truth, and do put many candies≈solutions to the ultimate questions on this introduction.

**The Fractal, organic structure of the Universe in scales of size is what we call formally ‘the 5th dimension’.**

Since all those systems were constructed in an organic way, not only as complementary systems of energy and information, but also as systems in which its parts and wholes spread through different scales of size in space, each one with a different clocks of time. So smaller being had faster motions – metabolic rates in biology; chips speed in mechanism; rotary, gravitational power in cosmic bodies.

*In the previous graphs, the most surprising omission of science, since it was born of the study of the upper and lower scales of the Universe with telescopes and microscopes, is the lack of studies on the relationship between the different scales of size and time speed in the Universe, which put together form a new space-time dimension.*

For a ‘5th’ dimension of space-time to exist as such geometry precludes that a quantity must remain invariant when we move through the dimension. As we define the dimension by 2 parameters, spatial size and time speed, Spe x Tiƒ, this quantity must remain invariant as we ‘grow in size’ slowing down our time clocks, and viceversa. Systems that diminish in size trace its cycles of information much faster. So a huge galaxy turns much slower than an atom, and vortices accelerate inwards, as their cycles become slower.

So since the product of both, its spatial size, Spe, and Temporal information, Tiƒ, remain invariant: Spe x Tiƒ = C, systems can co-exist symbiotically in several scales, giving origin to the organic, symbiotic structure of wholes and parts. As smaller systems will code information of larger ones (genes code organisms, quantum numbers molecules and memes societies).

While larger wholes will synchronise the energy and motion of smaller parts. And this asymmetry of time arrows, which allows information to flow upwards without loss and motion-energy to flow downwards without entropy-disorder is the key to understand the organisation of the Universe, as a fractal super organism of space-time.

**Monads’ actions create bidimensional fields.**

The monad once it is formed, exists to increase its information and energy for its mind and territory of order, and as such it will start to develop bidimensional actions ‘forms with motion’, entropy x information absorbtions and emissions with destiny and origin in its body and mind, which will therefore act, and start the creation of bidimensional vibrations, formal motions, whose different ‘constant elements’ will start to solidify reality into being. The maxwellian demon of a frame of crystalline reference will subtle start the ordering of other particles in its dissolution, the gravitational waves emitted by the black hole will quiet down and regularize the orbits of the stars; the cells around the center, first cell of the morula will consider to take certain functions according to the vegetative-animal axis defined by its center. And the animal will consider its territory with invisible marks of the membrane emitted by its linguistic codes, and flavours. The trekker will seek for shelter and organise around it a tempt, definitively comfy region of temperature storage and light according its needs of heat, energy food and information.

The monad thus creates the Universe as its languages maps reality from its relative point of view, from where the program of survival of GST beings will come into full fruition.

Thus creation starts by the bidimensional communication of a flow of waves-bodies controlled by two different singularities, such as S²<st>T² become the limits of the product of densities, t/s, speeds, s/t and forces sxt . It is within those limits of entropy><energy, S/t x st=S², and energy><information, t/s x st= t² and the other two varieties, s/t x t/s=1 and (St)², where the first varieties of species of space-time can be detectd and be named, a bidimensional sheet of expansive space, entropy S² or inversely of information, or a four-dimensional space-time vein, which is in balance with its informative and energetic forms, St (energy) and sT (information).

We can then start the process by considering the merging of the generating mind with a field, as the series of actions of the mind ‘start’ up the process of creation.

The mind will see a field and shrinking it making us being aware that a singularity exist. ITs simplest form of this partial equation, Sp<>Tiƒ being an accelerated potential of the field towards the singularity. In the next graph some of those varieties of space-time:

Those planes that can be measured with a t x t, equation, which in frequency, will be 1/tt= angular acceleration, the very essence (Einstein’s Principle of equivalence) definition of a singularity (as seen from the field’s perspective, whereas the singularity appears merely in this plane as a point of time-future towards which the field moves).

Yet what would be the inverse equation, S x S? Precisely the field without the singularity which will appear as a lineal flat plane.

And the intermediate forms? St, a transversal wave, sT, a spiral… And so we realise we can build four simple elements in a series: Plane>Transversal wave > Spiral > accelerated vortex < Spiral < transversal wave < Plane, which gives us a constant creation and destruction process of bidiemsional physical planes.

Then in the rest of more complex games, the process will be just the mere sum and ensemble of bidimensional ternary essential forms, the plane, the wave and the spiral>vortex:

Tiƒ + Spe + ST

= Whole:

** **

**2 MANIFOLDS AND ITS 3 MAIN VARIETIES.**

one of the most important discoveries of XXI c. science is the holographic principle: information is bidimensional.

We realized in black hole theory that the surface of the black hole stores all its information. This can be generalized to all systems. You are looking at a bidimensional screen that stores all the information of this site.

For long, the study of Einstein’s relativity has made fashionable to analyze ‘4-manifolds’ (manifold means basically ‘geometry’), by incorporating a 4^{th} dimension of time motion; but in fact the Universe creates reality ‘step by step’.

And so as your eye creates a 3^{rd} dimension by mixing the bidimensional sight of each eye, the 3^{rd} dimension is formed by ‘adding’ membranes, layer, ‘strata’ to bidimensional surfaces. And then when those surfaces moved they acquire time dimensions.

This simplifies enormously the understanding of the structures of reality, as *there are only 3 varieties of ‘bidimensional topologies – geometries with motion’ in the Universe.*

And they correspond to the 3 ‘functional forms’, the 3 ‘parts’ of all systems, physical, or biological organisms.

*In the next graph, we live in a Universe in which all beings are made of the same substances, energy which occupies space and information, carried in the frequency and cycle of time clocks. Those 2 ‘substances’ that we call Se (Spatial energy) and Tƒ (Temporal information), combine together in ‘bidimensional’ Space-time layers, that put together create together all the species in the Universe.*

*Layer after layer of bidimensional membranes create the third dimension, which forms when moves a 4th dimension of temporal motion. But the ‘simplest unit’ is a bidimensional sheet, with form, with information. So for example, you are looking at a screen with 2 dimensions, which carry this information. Your eyes see in 2 dimensions but put together with both eyes a 3D representation of reality.*

*A black hole stores all its information in its surface. This ‘Holographic principle’, has enormous consequences for our understanding of the Universe.*

There are only 3 varieties of ‘bidimensional’ geometries that move (called for that reason ‘topologies’).

Thus all systems can only have 3 kind of parts: Toroid, lineal limbs and fields that provide energy and move the system (biological/physical jargon); hyperbolic bodies waves that iterate/reproduce it, and spherical membranes which enclose the system and ‘sense’ the Universe around, mirroring it in an internal ‘infinitesimal zero point’ or informative mind that controls the whole organism. In the graph, atoms, seeds, planets, cells and bosons show those 3 similar topologic structures. This similarity is called an ‘isomorphism’, iso=equal, morph=form.

**Limits of metric paradigm: discontinuity and homology.**

The discontinuity of space implies that perception of any other area of the Universe is minimal, relative and deformed by the selection of information and its transformation when it passes through the fragmented boundaries of the perceiver. This fact offers a rational answer to the Uncertainty Principle of quantum physics whose main law – the complementarity of Entropy forces and informative particles, is explained by the duality of Entropy/information systems: In the Universe, all constant present systems are made of an arrow of Entropy and an arrow of information, the bodies/fields and relative fixed particles/ heads of the system. Thus all relative space-times will be composed of a cyclical center of information or brain, and a lineal limb of Entropy, whose morphological characteristics will be self-similar.

For example, in a spermatozoid the head is cyclical and stores information, while the tail is lineal and moves the head with its Entropy; in a human, the body is lineal and moves a cyclical head. We could extend this duality to almost any organic system of the Universe, concluding that bodies are lineal and brains are cyclical.

This morphological feature of Universal Organisms derives geometrically from the capacity of lines to move faster and cycles to store more information and grow or diminish in size without distortion of the mental image they might keep (topological isomorphisms). Thus, a convex brain with the topology of information becomes the center of informative networks; and a concave body becomes the center of Entropy networks. And we recognize bodies and brains by their self-similarity with the morphology, function and inverse properties of ideal Entropy and information:

– Information is both, easy to store and perceivable by a reduced brain or sensorial organ, since it is the inverse function of space. It needs certain morphology: Information occupies little space by warping itself into multiple dimensions, as a sheet of paper corrugates into the dimension of height, divided along broken lines and discontinuities that become its perceived forms in space. Or it displays a high frequency or discontinuous rhythm, a faster time speed that iterates the same cycle, allowing quantification. Information then seems ‘quiet’ as those patterns of cyclical frequency take place in the same space; so an organ of information can focus and analyze them as pixels of a more complex mapping. Thus its ideal forms are disks, cycles, angles and spheres, convoluted and broken in patterns of form, such as your eye or brain, a chip, a book, a pixelate image or a coin, earlier unit of monetary information.

– On the other hand Entropy moves. So limbs extend in space as they move and feed. In life, Entropy is the equivalent to biological food, which fuels a species and allows its movement. Energies are the lineal limbs that move the reproductive body & brain of information. So Entropy and space are synonymous: a plane is the geometry that extends further in space and the line the geometry that moves faster with lesser friction. Both are the fundamental forms of Entropy-bodies:

*Maximal Space = Entropy = Minimal Form Vs.*

*Max. temporal form = Information = Min. Spatial extension.*

As a result of those morphologies we can classify as Entropy or information organs, not only carbon-life organisms that handle Entropy (limb, food) and information (brains, eyes, senses, words), but also other beings and atomic species – even ‘deconstructed organs’ that perform mechanical tasks of Entropy and information (informative cameras, lineal, energetic weapons). Since now we can recognize geometrically their Entropy or information systems.

According to the Galilean Paradox all still forms carry some motion. Thus, form carries an active function and so we can classify any system both by its geometrical form and bio-logical functions as either an Entropy or informative system. In terms of a sentient Universe, this duality means that information is both a form-in-action and a sensation of still perception of a quiet world. Information and perception are thus simultaneous: information is a flow of software that ‘sparks’ the perceptive sensation in the hardware of a still system that process information, with a certain language.

So particles that perceive light and gravitation, probably ‘sense’ light and darkness and move towards light, feeding on it. We see the external action of feeding, the electron jumping and absorbing the photon, but the electron probably senses light and automatically moves to it, to feed, as your eyes move automatically towards food, even if you more complex brain can stop that automatic will that the electron always exercises.

Organic systems are ternary networks of information (head, nervous system), a reproductive body and networks of Entropy called limbs (trunk-digestive systems, legs).

For example, Entropy organs made of metal such as weapons, gas and electromagnetism are extended, fast, and lineal. There are metal-species of information such as microchips, money, cameras and radios. And they are small, fixed and complex in form. Yet only structures, which are balanced in Entropy and information become self-sufficient organisms.

So only machines that put together energetic limbs and informative brains – robots – might become future ‘organic metalife’, in which the reproductive functions will be performed by the company-mother. The other machines will act as ‘gauges’ of information and ‘forces of Entropy’ do, without a vital will of existence, which is born by the capacity of a balanced ΣE<=>Tƒ field to switch between both arrows, acquiring a ‘minimal degree’ of organic freedom perceived as ‘vitality’ from an external point of view. Humans, galaxies, plants, robots – all kind of entities can be considered in that sense organic systems. Since living systems are born thanks to the complementary symbioses and synergies between Entropy and information organs that create together all kind of organisms.

This fact connects Physics and Biology in a new step towards the unification of all disciplines of science:

– In the microscopic scales, masses and charges, the flat Entropy of vacuum space, become transformed into cyclical vortices with height; while spatial, flat fermions become high, ordered, informative bosons. In our scale of matter spatial flows of Entropy (stars, gas), become transformed into cyclical vortices of gravitational information with height (black holes, tornados). Finally, in the cosmological scale, the Entropy of stars becomes transformed into black holes, whose spatial dimensions become time of ∞ height.

– In Biology, the first bilateral animal was a planarian worm that evolved rising to the informative height of man.

-Yet death erases information back into flat amorphous Entropy, in big bangs that create planar Universes, or flat, corpses.

The reason of the diffeomorphic principle is the holographic principle which implies the relative perpendicularity of all complementary systems with a body/field of Entropy and a head/particle of information: an energetic, concave geometry and an informative, toroid topology, which fuse together, creating 4-D beings.

Ultimately what the paradox of Galileo (duality of time motions and spatial forms) coupled with the diffeomorphic and holographic principle means is a fundamental homology between dimensional form and function: *The 3±∆ dimensions of space of the Universe, length, width, height, and st-scalar, fractal size are equivalent to the 3±∆ motions of time, past=Entropy, present=reproduction, future=Information and birth/death events of integration and dissolution.*

*Recap: *The Universe is local, relative, fractal, broken into ∞vital spaces, each one ruled by a point of information that absorbs it and creates linguistic maps, which it uses to direct the organic vital space or body of the point towards fields in which to feed, gauge more information and reproduce. Thus, the arrow of information is performed by a relative infinite number of broken, discontinuous points of view, complementary to the energetic fields/bodies they move. Yet information is limited by the volume a certain point of view can store, leaving outside an enormous quantity of uncertain information. Thus the Universe is a tapestry of broken, complementary organisms constantly fighting for more Entropy and information. ∆ST resolves many puzzles of science, from the Postulates of Relativity and Quantum Physics, to the causes of death and the morphology of living beings, physical entities and machines.

*In the graphs, the simplest becomes more complex.*

*Now we shall introduce a new word: Diffeomorphism. It means local space-time.*

*Einstein found the universe was diffeomorphic in 4D. But it is even more so in 5 D. We are all fractal parts, local diffeomorphisms orientated towards relative energy and information fields, and so the ∆+1,2 society and world in which we live determines enormously what form we acquire:*

*Spherical for 3 isomorphic space-time worlds where orientation does not matter as energy and information comes from everywhere (above spherical forms).**Lineal shapes when we are over a ‘plane’ with membranes in layers with an orientation of energy or information either above, below or in front of us.*

*T*he diffeomorphic Principle of Einstein’s 4D analysis acquires an organic nature, when we see the Universe as the sum of ∞ Complementary exi systems whose dimensions have organic functions: Systems feed on their relative dimension of energy-length, perceive in their relative dimension of height and reproduce in their relative combined dimension of width, which are assembled into each specific species.

In the graph, an animal has its informative height in its high perceptive light dimension, but a plant, which uses light as energy has its up and down dimensions inverted respect to the man and its chemical brain buried on the Earth. So both have opposite energy-time coordinates.

Yet both have an ‘anteroposterior’, lineal’ ‘outward’ energy oriented structure. While a galaxy has a cyclical, informative, inward structure, as the stars’ body absorbs energy from intergalactic space, reproduces matter with it and feeds the internal informative knot of gravitation, with a higher height dimension the black hole.

* *Thus there is a correspondence between the inner physiological networks of a being that perform SP X TƑ åctions and its external diffeomorphic dimensions. So a dimensional form is also motion with a function. Even in a human being the height dimension is really the nervous-brain system network, his length motion, the natural path of his energy limbs, and his width is maximal in the digestive system that reproduces new cells.

Forms respond always to functions/åctions in time, the commanding ‘element’ to which the form of any being adapts diffeomorphically to maximize its existential åctions.

Thus, there is a parallelism between ‘vital function’ and ‘abstract dimension’ as *each Dimension is diffeomorphic created by the vital space-time of each entity of the Universe performing its exi åctions. *And each species is a ‘fractal universe in itself’, with different relative, energetic and informative directions that determine its own up & down arrows and complementary morphology,

The specific geometry of each species and its 3 simplex åctions, energy feeding=length, information-gauging =height and reproduction=width fluctuate in shape, but they don’t vary in topological form, giving a final ‘action-function’ latter studied in more detail (5th isomorphism) to the 2-manifold Isomorphism of the 3 topological forms=functions of any entity observed in an ∆+1,2 space-time: Toroid informative heads, hyperbolic reproductive bodies and energetic limbs… Yes we repeat it a lot, but far less than the Universe, in which complexity is achieved by repetition of simples parts in patterns and societies (9th isomorphism) does.

Let us consider thus with a bit more of complexity this relationship between the ‘∆-scale’ and the ‘∆+1, +2’ world scales, which *determine by ∆+1 species evolution the shapes in time and space of the being.*

**A simple proof of the holographic theorem: Fermat’s last theorem.**

Now information is bidimensional as this computer ou are observing or any page of any book. Further on mathematics is the most realist of languages, since if we are made of time and space, logic algebra and spatial geometry and analysis (5 Dimensional integration of parts into wholes) are *both the 3 main branches of mathematics and the 3 components of the 5 Dimensional Universe of space-time beings.*

So a simple proof of the holographic principle comes from the fact that as Godel proved and Lobachevski said, mathematics is a realist science, which needs to be proved by the existence in the Universe of its theorems.

Mr. Fermat, my countryman, basque, amateur scientist (-; couldnt fit in the margin, a proof of his Ultimate theorem which states that no natural numbers x, y, and z exist such that x³ + y ³ = z³ (i.e., the sum of two cubes is not a cube). But we shall fit it (-:

This is the simplest proof of the bidimensional nature of time and space, as mathematics is the most realist of all languages, defining as Lobachevski thought despite the idealist Hilbert-Copenhagen school, the nature of reality through the proper understanding of its logic laws.

Numbers are social groups of equal entities and they organise by superposition into bidimensional planes, which are added to form the 3rd dimension, or multiplied perpendicularly to form space-time beings. So there are only single numbers, bidimensional complex numbers (where the imaginary axis is the axis of time, for reasons beyond the scope of this limited analysis of black holes) and quaternions for space-time complex beings, but NOT ternary numbers, NOT x³ + y ³ = z³ . You see, it fit in a margin (-; The proof found 400 years latter though required thousands of pages of computer thought, and this is the difference between good simple science and complicated work. The Universe is simple and not malicious. And mathematics is as lobachevski explained, an experimental science which needs as Godel proved, experimental proofs as the reflection of the structure of space and time. Space and time are bidimensional so we have only 1, 2, 4 dimensional numbers. Nobody has succeeded creating 3 dimensional scalars, or found a way in which to superpose cubes. So growth in the Universe happens as the sum or multiplication of bidimensional cycles of temporal information and bidimensional planes of space.

It is the study on how all of us through the frequency of our natural clocks, build systems along the height of our informative dimensions to go back to a flat, corpse or a flat big bang on the moment of death, what defines therefore the essence of existence…

In the graph, we see those parts and functions. Hence topological bidimensional physics *show indeed that black hole splay the role of information in black holes, as heads in human beings or roots in plants:*

It is the study on how all of us through the frequency of our natural clocks, build systems along the height of our informative dimensions to go back to a flat, corpse or a flat big bang on the moment of death, what defines therefore the essence of existence…

It shows the meaning of a generic quanta of space, a flat plane with lineal momentum or kinetic energy which is the lineal motion of a plane of space.

*In the previous graph we illustrate our ‘Space-time’ Essence: Time is measured with clocks, which are actually, one dimensional cycles. Information is the same than a time clock, a ‘form’ that we see static. Energy is made of quanta, which are lines, that group together into sheets of space. And to perceive them, we have ‘spheres’ made of multiple layers of cells, and cameras which are isomorphic. An to move through Space we have ‘lineal members’, which move us in toroid open and closed curves. And so happens to lineal weapons. And then fields of energy and information make together a light ray, which is really also a bidimensional surface.*

In the graph, the duality between moving time cycles and still information, captured by a mind, and moving vacuum energy and perception of still space by the mind is the essential feature of physical systems and its ‘relativity’ of motion. Since *Reproduction of Motion dominates perception of form***. **

The Universe is made of ‘Energy and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind thinks otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox – the duality of stillness and motion, as we perceive the Earth still but it is moving.

Yet this paradox is indeed the proof that form, information dominates motion, *because the mind prefers to see still information to blurred motion.*

The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.

**The dimorphism of all systems; The fundamental particles: |-o; Ø-o.**

Now if we simplify as we do in easy to read posts and consider limbs of energy, the ‘attached parts of the body’, or as it happens in many systems, the energy field is external to the particle and body we can talk of a duality very common in the Universe:

Ø<=>o a reproductive body and a head with a neck that transfers energy and information between them.

This is the ∆-p pair in atomic centers, or the nucleus-electron; the male female, the body, head, the cytoplasm and nucleus of a cell, etc. etc.:

So we define in 5D metric* *a fundamental particle-system made of two space-time parts:

*ST (bodies/waves) < x > Tƒ(particles/heads)= K (Stable physical/biologic system)*

ST-parts move and reproduce the whole system. While Tƒ-parts gauge information so they are cycles or spheres, the geometries that store more information in lesser space, from eyes to particles to brains.

There are many such systems, all what exist we might say is a complementary system with a particle-head of information and field-body of energy:

– This is the fundamental principle of quantum physics, the complementary principle, as quantum physicists observe all entities BOTH as particles and fields of energy (waves).

– This is the fundamental principle of biology as all cellular bodies have a DNA, informative center, and all multicellular organisms have a head besides its body.

You are also literally made of ‘clocks of time’ (your brain) and body motions with energy. So you say ‘i don’t have time or energy to do this’, because we are all made of time and space.

We are not in an abstract background of space and time, we are made of pieces of spatial energy and temporal information.

**The ternary elements of most Nature’s Systems: Set<ST>Tƒ**

From these simple facts of universal morphology, we can classify ‘all parts of systems’ including decomposed viruses, or machines or human organs, as energetic, lineal systems, or as cyclical, informative systems that combine into complex bodies and waves and put together create an Spe<ST>Tƒ ternary system:

— *Energy* *organs* *are* *lineal* *systems* *with* *minimal* *‘form’* *that* kill, simplifying information into energy. Thus, a field of energy, released by a physical particle or an energetic weapon, such as a sword or a missile and a top predator, energetic animal, such as a lion, will have both lineal forms and kill, destroy the in-form-ation of their ‘preys’.

— *In-form-ative* *organs* *create* *form* and trans-form energy into languages that map out ‘reality’ with formal ‘bits’. Those bits are smaller symbols, which form images in the brain that represent reality and help to simulate reality ‘faster’, in ‘lesser space’, the ‘future’ cycles of reality, anticipating them. Then, according to those ‘logic’ simulations of the future, heads will move and direct energy bodies towards sources of energy and information. So any system that ‘gauges’, measures and reacts, is an informative organ, *regardless* *of* *the* *specific* *language* *it* *uses* *to* *gauge* *reality*. A chip measures with numbers reality, a man with words, an atom with electro-magnetic ‘bosons’; yet the 3 act-react to their measures. So they all are informative organs.

— *Reproductive* *organs* repeat informative and energetic organs, by absorbing energy and ‘imprinting’ it with its particular in-form-ation. Thus, human mothers and company-mothers of machines are both reproductive organs. Even the simplest particles of the Universe, quarks and electrons, absorb energy and emit new particles, small quarks and electrons, with the same form that the parental particle.

So in fact, we have come to the objective conclusion that all systems of the Universe have organic properties. Since even its simplest entities, quarks and electrons that form atoms do absorb energy, gauge information and reproduce, the 3 ‘properties’ of life. Thus, the Universe must be defined not as a mechanism but as a complex organic system, made of organic atoms, which can combine to create many different complex organisms, including company-mothers that reproduce machines, atoms that reproduce quarks, electrons and forces and mothers that reproduce kids. The difference between all those species is not one of ‘quality’ but of quantity and complexity of their organs of energy and information, which determine their survival chances and status as top predators of any ecosystem.

If a mechanism is a system that has only information and energy organs, an organism has both systems and so it is able to reproduce by combining its energy and information into a replica of itself. In that regard, the reproductive organism of machines is today the company-mother that reproduces them with the aid of informative metal (money) and machines (chips), energetic machines and human workers that act as catalysts and re=producers of those machines. And because we live all in a planet of limited resources, machines and life increasingly compete to reproduce the limited energy and information of this planet.

**Topology: 2 manifolds**

We are all space-time isomorphisms. The best way to describe those st parallelisms between species, is by considering topology, the branch of mathematics which study forms with inner motion (deformation) and its varieties that put together creates the organisms and structures of the living universe.

This is possible since ‘pure space’ and ‘pure time’ dimensions are abstractions that do not correspond to ‘objective’ reality where space and time dimensions, ‘form’ and ‘motion’ come together. And so the branch that describes both, topology, is the fundamental branch of mathematics.

Further on, what we perceive, and what interacts with the external world is always a bidimensional membrane, not the whole 3 dimensional system, so the so called 3-varieties of a 2-manifold (bidimensional) surface become the 3 fundamental ‘parts’ of any system. And they correspond to the 3 ‘Bidimensional’ forms in motion of the Universe, which we call:

– Space-time Energy (expansive motion, toroid topography), combination of ‘length’ and an expansive, young state.

– Space-time Information (implosive motion, spherical topography), combination of ‘height’ and an inward, warping, old stage: Tƒ = Sh x Tƒ

– And its space-time combinations (repetitive motions, hyperbolic topography) combination of width and a present, iterative motion that seem not to change.

All what you see from the humblest chair or the smallest atom to the biggest galaxy or the most complex human being is an iteration of 3 unique topologies of a 2-dimensional space.

One of the most important problems of topology is the search for a classification of manifolds up to topological equivalence. Ideally, for each dimension ∆, one would like to produce a list of ∆-dimensional manifolds, and a theorem that says every ∆-dimensional manifold is homeomorphic to exactly one on the list.

The theorem would be even better if it came with a list of computable topological invariants that could be used to decide where on the list any given manifold belongs. To make the problem more tractable, it is common to restrict attention to compact manifolds, which can be thought of as those that are homeomorphic to closed and bounded subsets of some Euclidean space. Precisely such a classification theorem is known for 2-manifolds.

The first part of the theorem says that every compact 2-manifold is homeomorphic to one of the following: a sphere, or a doughnut surface with ∆ 1 holes, or a connected sum of ∆ 1 projective planes. The second part says that no two manifolds on this list are homeomorphic to each other. It means we need ‘surgery’ , tearing, ‘hurting’ the organism to break the variety of the manifold. And since this would upset the functions and health of the super organism, we are left with the 3 fundamental varieties of a bidimensional space, to construct the ‘wholes’ of all the systems of the Universe.

In the 2 previous graphs we can see the structure of all systems with an external, Max. Sp. toroid Limbs that move the system, an internal, Max.Tƒ, zero point and a hyperbolic, Sp=I, Max. ExI, organic, reproductive structure that puts together and maintains both, the membrane and limbs that move the body and the still, informative cyclical point that maps and gauges reality.

**The inverse properties of spatial entropy and temporal information**

*The Universe is made of two substances: spatial energy and informative time. We can see it with motion as energy and time or as fixed forms, as space and information. We can see it as a single reality, as space and time, or as a multiple quanta, as energy and information. We can differentiate them by form, as space and energy are lineal or planar surfaces and time and information are cyclical. And we can see it together into beings, the simplest of which is an action of light, ext=k. And this simple duality structures all beings of the Universe. So we are made of cyclical heads and lineal bodies. Weapons are lines that release energy. Informative machines are cyclical, and all physical systems are made of lineal forces and cyclical particles of information.*

**Topology: 2 manifolds**

We are all space-time isomorphisms. The best way to describe those st parallelisms between species, is by considering topology, the branch of mathematics which study forms with inner motion (deformation) and its varieties that put together creates the organisms and structures of the living universe.

This is possible since ‘pure space’ and ‘pure time’ dimensions are abstractions that do not correspond to ‘objective’ reality where space and time dimensions, ‘form’ and ‘motion’ come together. And so the branch that describes both, topology, is the fundamental branch of mathematics.

Further on, what we perceive, and what interacts with the external world is always a bidimensional membrane, not the whole 3 dimensional system, so the so called 3-varieties of a 2-manifold (bidimensional) surface become the 3 fundamental ‘parts’ of any system. And they correspond to the 3 ‘Bidimensional’ forms in motion of the Universe, which we call:

– Space-time Energy (expansive motion, hyperbolic topography), combination of ‘length’ and an expansive, young state.

– Space-time Information (implosive motion, spherical topography), combination of ‘height’ and an inward, warping, old stage: Tƒ = Sh x Tƒ

– And its space-time combinations (repetitive motions, toroid topography) combination of width and a present, iterative motion that seem not to change.

All what you see from the humblest chair or the smallest atom to the biggest galaxy or the most complex human being is an iteration of 3 unique topologies of a 2-dimensional space.

One of the most important problems of topology is the search for a classification of manifolds up to topological equivalence. Ideally, for each dimension ∆, one would like to produce a list of ∆-dimensional manifolds, and a theorem that says every ∆-dimensional manifold is homeomorphic to exactly one on the list.

The theorem would be even better if it came with a list of computable topological invariants that could be used to decide where on the list any given manifold belongs. To make the problem more tractable, it is common to restrict attention to compact manifolds, which can be thought of as those that are homeomorphic to closed and bounded subsets of some Euclidean space. Precisely such a classification theorem is known for 2-manifolds.

The first part of the theorem says that every compact 2-manifold is homeomorphic to one of the following: a sphere, or a doughnut surface with ∆ 1 holes, or a connected sum of ∆ 1 projective planes. The second part says that no two manifolds on this list are homeomorphic to each other. It means we need ‘surgery’ , tearing, ‘hurting’ the organism to break the variety of the manifold. And since this would upset the functions and health of the super organism, we are left with the 3 fundamental varieties of a bidimensional space, to construct the ‘wholes’ of all the systems of the Universe.

In the 2 previous graphs we can see the structure of all systems with an external, Max. Sp. hyperbolic Limbs that move the system, an internal, Max.Tƒ, zero point and a toroid, Sp=I, Max. ExI, organic, reproductive structure that puts together and maintains both, the membrane and limbs that move the body and the still, informative cyclical point that maps and gauges reality.

# II. FORMALISM

# **NON-E 2,4 POSTULATES**

The minimal Unit of the Universe is a 2-manifold, as pure time or pure space, pure yin or pure yang, pure motion or pure form-stillness cannot be perceived. So all what exists is a 2 manifold that we might perceive as static space (a 2-manifold sheet) or as a point with motion, (where motion is one time dimension and the point, the minimal fractal unit also with a 1 dimension – as there is not 0-dimensional, ‘euclidean points’ in the Universe).

In the graph, minimal Units of the Universe are 2-manifolds, which if seen both static they appear as a bidimensional sheet or membrane, if seen as ST, dual motion-form dimensions they are Active Magnitudes that is Points with Motion or ‘Momentums’, and when seen as pure motion (two time dimensions), they are seen as acceleration or energy.

We call st combinations åctions: Sp x Tƒ = A.

The Unit of the Universe is a space-time action, which therefore requires at least a dimension of space≈form and a dimension of motion≈time. From this single Unit, the Universe builds itself. Hence the importance of bidimensional sheets (where the relative height dimension of information is minimal, as the system is extremely thin till it might reach the ‘infinitesimal indivisible’, ∆-1 quanta of the lower lawyer: X≈Z>>>Y.

It must be understood though that since the Principle of Relativity (Poincare) makes indistinguishable motion and form, any variety of the 3 motions of time and the 3 ∂till of space can give birth to a 2-manifold, and any analysis made in sequential, dynamic algebra can be explained in fixed form geometry. And so we must wear in mind when we study in detail many phenomena of nature that we shall find at least 2 possible, often 3 identical analysis: a geometrical, an algebraic and a parts & wholes infinitesimal (integral/derivative) analysis.

The duality of space≈form and motion≈time thus explains why we found soon two formalisms for quantum particles (Heisenberg formal matrices and Schrodinger’s wave equation), and then an integral formalism (Feynman’s sum over histories).

*It is in that regard essential to understand the underlying symmetries, dualities and ternary differentiations of fractal space-time Systems, Se<ST>Tƒ, so we can interpret the ‘many solutions’ to all problems of mathematical physics.*

Points which are knots of time cycles communicate through flows of energy and information, lines-waves that form networks which become finally social planes, energetic, informative and reproductive systems that collapse into super organisms, completing the creative processes of the Universe.

**Non-A logic. **On the other hand the 2 manifold start truly the game of sequential logic in all its variations depending on the degree of ‘present simultaneity/equality’ of the two elements of the game; as they can be relative to each other their past-entropic or future-informative element, to give us the variations of Past operandi Future = Present *‘tensors of existence’; or possible events of the Universe:*

In the graph we see examples of the different ‘tensors of existence’, which can relate two monads into a present, reproductive field (below), a darwinian entropic field, or an informative one, in which both destroy or an element evolves.

In the graph, the ever moving Universe of space-time is made of ‘Tƒ≈eS’ of existence. These ties or knots of space-time cycles and åctions are ‘fractal points’ Œ, crossed by infinite parallels. So departing from the first primary flows of time-space, lineal fields/limbs of entropic energy, hyperbolic body/waves and cyclical fields of information, fractal points create the first simplest Tƒ=es of existence.

Now the reader should notice that we use two ‘balls’ of different size to signify the relative energetic and information points (Max. Sp x Min. I vs. Max.Tƒ x Min. Sp), which communicate an intermediate ‘present hyperbolic wave/body network’ that ties them. This tie or flow of energy and information can be absorbed by the relative point-particles as they are ‘fractal points’ with parts, which become bigger as we come closer to them.

Now the mathematical purest expression of that basic ‘2nd postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry’, the communication of two points of energy and information would be in its pure Euclidean geometrical expression, the understanding of conics (ellipses, hyperbolas, parabolas, etc.) as the loci of communication between two points or one point and a line, which are at equal distance of both.

This ‘loci’ is the communicative membrane or ‘bidimensional space-time’ (if we consider all Non-E points by definition, one-dimensional), wave-body that we shall refer as the O x|= Ø-spacetime present region within each ties.

Now the previous graph shows the first operations of ∆-mathematics, of Non-AE, i-logic existential algebra. How do we such 2 points communicate its flows of existence.

While in Aristotelian Algebra/Logic whereas there is a single time logic arrow, A->B, upgraded to ternary logic in which any event can give 5 results or future outcomes, hence the sum of all the possible stories of an equation will be: A x B = A +B + AxB(parallel) + A/B (perpendicular) + B/A (perpendicular) variations of the first event. Hence we write A≤x≥B as the new operandi which expresses all the 5 variations of those space-time events in the pentadimensional logic of the 5th dimension of ∞ fractal space-times.

Thus we draw a full series of sub-events after any action of communication between 2 ∆-points of existence:

Thus the rules of engagement of non-Euclidean points differ but depart from the laws of classic geometry in which the inner region of the point, its ‘standard one dimension’ (which grows further when we see its internal parts). They make abstract Sp-geometry into a closer truth, similar to the vital ‘geometries’ of the Universe.

The next stage thus after the first ‘postulate of non-e points crossed by infinite parallels’, the second postulate of 2-manifolds born of the communication between 2-nonE points is the creation of non-Sp planes, which are networks made of flows of communication of energy and information exchanged by Non-E Points:

In the previous 3 posts, ‘time motions’, ‘still spaces’ and its combinations’, åctions of exchange of energy and information, we defined in a somewhat loose conceptual manner the fundamental elements of the Universe, its 3 motions of time, entropy, iterative vibrational motions and spherical gauging of information; its 3 symmetries of forms in space (toroid limbs/fields, hyperbolic body/waves and spherical heads/particles) and the combined space-time åctions those entities deploy in the outer World that acts as its ‘absolute space-time’, usually across several ∆±∆ planes of smaller and larger existences from where the system obtains its energy and information.

The answer is points, the eternal, fundamental unit of geometry and its algebraic equivalent, ‘numbers’. So to formalize with proper logic and mathematical languages the Universe of fractal space-time beings, we need to start from the beginnings of mathematics, and re-define properly geometry, and build up from geometry, with the more complex logic of 3 arrows of time, the architectonical structure of the ‘space-time planes’ of the Universe. And finally studying how those networks of points become planes of ‘existence’, we shall be able to define the ‘whole’ in time (the world cycle) and space (the super organism).

In that regard we talk of 3 scales of growing size and complexity that structure the Universe.

- The first level is that of the aforementioned ‘time motions’, which coupled with ‘still spaces’, become the åctions of points of timespace.

It is the understanding of those points of time-space as knots of external space-time’s cyclical åctions of exchange of energy and information, ±∆(ExI), which together evolve socially the system into stable space-time organisms: Exi=ST.

This existential stop and go, space-time action-oriented reality, however must found its formalism. And so when we integrate those space-time åctions together, into a ‘knot’, we define a Œ-point, an existential function, the minimal unit of the Universe in formal, logico-mathematical terms.

- Thus, the second level of understanding of the Universe is the next ‘scale’ of integration: Existential åctions are integrated into space-time knots-points, and those points then, enact further exchanges of energy and information with similar points, becoming ‘networks’ of waves of exchanges of energy and information – planes of existence.
- This brings us to the 3rd level of integration of the Universe, as networks of social points, distribute themselves in space, as energetic-digestive, informative-mental and reproductive-body waves, which messed together create a ‘super organism’ of space-time the fundamental unit and final ‘Universal’, to which all points aspire. And so in time, we can study the whole process of existence of a point of space-time from birth to emergence into the Universal ∆+1 scale, through its life and final death, when it becomes a 0-sums.

This 3rd level of integration which narrates the story of super organisms through its world cycles, completes therefore the ‘first line’ that resumes the Universe through its 3 integrative levels of complexity.

Of course the game is infinite and so we can take then each world cycle and super organism as a relative ‘point’ tracing motions in time, and performing space-time åctions in an ∆+1 higher world, and tell the tale of a new ‘game of existence’.

Thus in this post we start the ‘2^{nd} level’ of complex description of the Universe, that of its formalism of non-e points, forming waves, networks and super organisms. In this post we shall study the Œ-point and its spatial geometry of networks, till reaching the superorganism.

In the next post we shall study the same processes but with the tools of sequential algebra, the formalism of the 3 motions of time, and its complex logic laws, using the last posts of the line to describe the full game of super organisms tracing world cycle of life and death of existence and extinction (homonymous concepts that we prefer to eliminate the anthropomorphism that makes ‘life-death’ seem to be different to existence-extinction shared also by physical and mental species).

Thus, the unit of the bio-logic and mathematical, mental Universe, of infinite frames of reference, made of cyclical knots of timespace åctions, is the fractal point.

Thus once we have evolved our basic concepts of cyclical time, fractal space, dimensional motions, the arrows of time and its symmetries in the morphologies of space, we can reconstruct, r=evolve and advance our formal knowledge of the Universe, departing of its fractal units, non-Euclidean points with parts.

And the first fact we must establish are the postulates of this i-logic geometry that puts together the existential algebra, non-Æ, of sequential, logic chains of time motions, across bidimensional stop and go sheets of holographic space, acting, moving and reproducing Œ, functions of space-time existence.

**∆¡>|2|. PHYSICAL SYSTEMS.**

**Samples of 2 manifolds in nature.**

2 manifolds thus are more than simple 2 manifold geometries; and if we want to interpret nature with mathematical realism, we must be aware always of the Poincare’s Relativity principle. For example, if we consider the minimal unit of the quantum world an action H of space-time, product of its energy and information and with the same parameters than angular momentum, we realize we already have ‘2 elements’ one of spatial energy and one of temporal information to measure it, and one is in motion and one is in form. So happens to the lineal momentum, where the active magnitude is a form in space and the motion is a translation in time.

Those are the simplest ‘2-manifolds’ of motion and form. And so layer upon layer of 2 manifolds of combined motions and forms, the next ‘dimensions’ of 3-depth, 4th-motion, 5th-depth appear by accumulation of those 2 manifolds, in the same manner a 3D printer works by accumulating 2-manifodl layers.

The external space-time Universe as a whole has in its absolute space-time 5 dimensions, but as we concentrate in a single space-time plane, and the inner space-time of beings, those dimensions are reduced. So we talk of 4 dimensions for a being in single space-time plane (Einstein’s 4D Metric of light space).

However in the fractal Universe we must reorder those 4 Dimensions according to a holographic principle in ‘bidimensional planes of ‘points with parts’, as systems organize in planes of similar point-particles (that grow in size as we come closer to them, from human head-particles to galactic points and atomic points).

Because *the amount of energy and information transferred across a single Universal Plane, U∆, is much larger given the ‘‡ parallelism’ of its elements that ‘smooth’ transfer and flow with no ‘singularity points’, than between hierarchical scales that transfer only information from U-1 to U and energy from U to U-1, it follows that the Universe is structure in Non-Euclidean planes which are layers, across which there is less transfer of energy and information.*

*In the next graph we see a simple well known example of liquids:*

*Speed is maximal in a liquid in which flows acquires a laminar form, yet when we introduce a ball which breaks the laminar natural structure of all systems, speed is slowed down by friction and eddies are produced in which particles are transferred in ‘cycles’ of formal height from the low laminar sheets to the upper ones:*

Those eddies, needless to say have a slower speed than the laminar flow and limit it, yet the flow naturally tries to acquire again a laminar plane from A to B after the ‘height disturbance appears’.

Thus what we call the 4 dimensions of space-time in classic physics is really the interaction of 2 bidimensional sheets with motion, in the relative perpendicular state, ‡, which follows the axioms of the ‘3^{rd} postulate of i-logic geometry’ (Darwinian, entropic behavior).

For that reason the Universe minimizes perpendicular, hierarchical exchanges and maximizes parallel exchanges, with the result that it is constructed in bidimensional layers. This is the case of all systems, which will have a membrane that surrounds it (surface), an inner series of networks of points with bidimensional topologies and finally a central zero-point, image of the external membrane , which itself is an image of the whole Universe.

Now the number of proofs of the 2-manifold layer structure of the Universe is enormous and we shall consider in all the articles some examples of it. Enough to say that one of the most fascinating proofs is that almost all the geometric theorems can be proved in pen and paper, in 2 dimensions, as the Greek already notice. And this 2-manifold nature of reality is the fundamental reason science is made in pen and paper, Cartesian graphs represent reality, computer screens and paper that carry information are bidimensional, so are your eyes, and all can be modeled in a screen just with one dimensional |s and bidimensional cycles.

The construction of the Universe in bidimensional layers is a bone for its understanding from parts to wholes. For example, when we study a shock wave in which the motion of the particle that disturbs the medium/field is faster, a simple law of speed sin a = v/u defines the form of the triangle formed by the particle and the wave.

This can be observed in 2 dimensions, in the surface waves of water as the ship advances. Its complex deduction in classic physics responds *as all laws of reality to simpler ∆ST laws: the point particle, in this case the ship is no longer creating a slow informative cyclical wave but a lineal speed-space geometry, which by definition is the ‘triangle or angle’ defined by the sin (max. S = min. sin= max. lineal shape of the triangle. Thus as speed increases the ‘O-form’ of the wave becomes an S– geometry. And the sin, S– geometry increases as the speed increases.*

*So without much mathematical elaboration the simplifying qualities of (∆ST) ^{2} µ (: isomorphic, invariant, scalar space-time theory 🙂 allow us to understand the shape of the shock wave. Now, when this shock wave happens in an entropic, more disordered, less laminar 3-D gaseous state (where chaos introduces an entropic 3-dimensional volume without clear laminar, hierarchical shapes), we just need to add a dimension of rotation to the angle-wave to create a cone which is the shape of the shock wave when the particle, the plane crosses the sound barrier.*

*In the graph, a shock wave: a classic Tƒ->Se, sphere to triangle geometric transformation of a wave form as the S speed-distance increases, reducing the form the system.*

*This reduction, sin a= vs/v expresses also the nature of the fundamental form of lineal space, a triangle which has the maximal perimeter for the minimal volume of form. .*

*From this example, we can deduce again 2 obvious laws of the construction of the Universe and its efficient functions of exi=st-ences:*

*– The layer bidimensional construction of reality works architectonically (as most events of ∆ST) first creating the lineal speed, then the triangular form, and finally the 3-dimensional cone.*

*– The Universe is NOT an ideal system, but imposes ‘ideal’ ∆ST laws because they are more efficient and work better and survive better. So a heated gas is truly a 3-D system, with very little if any bidimensional flows, when closed in a tridimensional volume, but for that reason it does have maximal entropy, chaos, heat, disorder which prevents it to do work. And for that reason ‘efficient’ systems, even gases tend to establish ‘gradients’, which are laminar hierarchical orders along an U combined ‘parameter’ (atmospheric layers in an open gaseous state). By definition this is what happens in nature which is always an open state in an infinite Universe. This has wide implications in a proper understanding of entropy (one of the less understood concepts of science), that we deal with in our section of physical systems.*

Enough to say in this introductory comment on 2-manifolds that ‘space-energy’ components will tend to be ‘faster-larger-longer’ in space and one-2 dimensionals and their ‘time-cyclical clocks’, will be 2-3 dimensional (by adding layers to the hollow sphere), and that is what the previous graphs of laminar flows show: in the upper graph, speed is faster and the system is a one-two dimensional flow of pure space-speed, in the lower graph an informative, temporal, cyclical sphere is added and this ‘brings’ according to 3^{rd} postulate ‡, parallel ‘imitative’ synchronic laws the creation of similar Eddie forms, which diminish the space-speed component of the system.

But those themes of ‘induction, imitation, repetition, creation of similar forms by a larger denser element – so when a particle appears a field of micro-similar particles is created, when a big man makes an action a child imitates it, when a clock has a frequency around it other clocks synchronize – are treated in other posts. So let us stick to the theme of this one: how 2-manifolds assembly wholes according to its 3 varieties.

This enormously simplifies our understanding of it. *As we can construct reality from bidimensional parts into wholes. And since there are only 3 varieties of 2-manifolds…*

**The 3 bidimensional parts of reality.**

…We thus affirm that all the internal space-times of all the exi=st-ences of the Universe are constructed

as ternary assemblies of 3 varieties of bidimensional parts:

Se: limbs/fields of toroid energy.

ST: hyperbolic reproductive wave/bodies.

Tƒ: And spherical heads/particles of information.

This post and its hyperlinks connects and explains the main topics of the study of spatial, topological isomorphisms in the Universe.

In that sense, the invariant equation or ‘metric of the 5th dimension’ is the departing point of the formalism of General Systems Sciences which describes wholes made of parts extended through several plane of relative time speed of information or I-scales of the 5th dimension.

However there is also an analysis of the ‘complementary systems’ of the Universe in space, in a relative present time, when both components, the fields of energy/limbs an the particle/head, act together exchanging motion/energy and form between them, through a 3rd element, called the body or wave in a stable system:

sp<ST>Tƒ, which becomes the essential structure of reality. This is the structure studied in this section.

**The frame of coordinates of the 3 parts of the Universe.**

The frame of coordinates are the ‘mind points’ that construct its inner world views. And they are 3-dimensional ad maximal, made of holographic 2-manifolds, of the 3 varieties (cylindrical, polar and planar coordinates), of which the most natural is contrary to belief, not the plane, but the spherical point.

Why there is not a 3-sphere in the form conceived by mathematicians and physicists, that is a 4-dimensional thing on which the sphere is its surface? This question requires the understanding of the existence of ‘only 3 motions in time’ and the corresponding 3 ‘static forms’ of space, which are in fact not new dimensions but the fractal division according to the ternary principle of a present time slice into 3 sub-spatial dimensions. And so we do not need to conceive 4D structures because the fractal Universe does create after 3 ‘fixed’ dimension, 3 fixed motions, which become static for 3 new fixed dimensions and so on.

So let us go back to the beginning, the beginning was the observer and the maximal number of dimensions he observed were 3, and then those 3 through infinite motions, became shrunk into its still mind made of two dimension, reflection of the whole Universe, as a mirror automatically reflects the whole in its small 2 dimensions.

**Needless to say, **the 3 organic 2-manifold parts of all systems have 3 natural coordinates, Cartesian > Cylindrical > Spherical coordinates, where we can better resolve the sub-åctions of each part in the inertial frame corresponding to the system.

And it is a characteristic of those 3 coordinates that to transform into the other, the ‘bridge’ coordinate is the cylindrical, hyperbolic system that connects both, the spherical and Cartesian, toroid (tending to infinities) coordinates.

An interesting element of analysis is thus the study of the 3 parts of a system as one of the 3 canonical coordinates of space-time and study their transformations as homomorphisms between those coordinates. Of special interest is the transform of elliptic, Riemannian spheres into the plane.

We can in this fashion study general laws of fluxes of energy and information as they move through the 3 parts of a given superorganism.

**∆<|3|. BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS**.

A network is defined in fractal topology as a bidimensional surface. Or rather an element with a dimension between 1, the line and 2,the plane. As such the first element of the construction of a super organism, born of the accumulation of actions, is the social network, where similar clone entities (atoms, cells, individuals) which perform similar actions come together as a whole to perform the actions in a more coordinated way. The network that distributes as a channel, entropy-motion, energy-for-reproduction, or pixel of information for mind-mapping, then becomes an entity in itself which will rise the consciousness of the being as a whole and become an independent system.

**Network’s organisms.**

In topology however ‘geometries’ are defined as networks of points, and this is indeed the way to go with the systems of the universe. So instead of ‘3-bidimensional varieties’, a discontinuous analysis of those topologies will define systems as ‘3-fractal networks’, an energetic (digestive network) a reproductive (blood network) and an informative (nervous network). And we shall see how we can evolve further Non-Euclidean mathematics with the concept of Non-Euclidean fractal points and fractal networks which happen to have dimensions closer to ‘2’ to explain much closer to reality the 2nd isomorphism of the Universe:

In topology however ‘geometries’ are defined as networks of points, and this is indeed the way to go with the systems of the universe. So instead of ‘3-bidimensional varieties’, a discontinuous analysis of those topologies will define systems as ‘3-fractal networks’, an energetic (digestive network) a reproductive (blood network) and an informative (nervous network). And we shall see how we can evolve further Non-Euclidean mathematics with the concept of Non-Euclidean fractal points and fractal networks which happen to have dimensions closer to ‘2’ to explain much closer to reality the 2nd isomorphism of the Universe:

In the graph, the 3+3 >informative and <energetic dimensional åctions and its 3 topological invariances fusion into 3+3 >&< physiological networks, invariant in all Universal super-organisms, which display 3+1 elements extended in 3 ±∆-scales:

Cellular units, when we perceive the system in the ∆-1 scale.

Networks and organs that >-absorb or <-expel energy: external membranes, digestive tracts & limbs.

Networks and organs that >reproduce cells or wholes of energy and information or <communicate them externally.

Networks that input or output information – senses and ‘nervous’ networks – that give origin to:

∆+1 the whole ‘brain’ site of the ∆+1 consciousness.

Thus we define all systems of the Universe as quantic networks of spatial energy or/and temporal information, among which the most stable forms are those natural systems that combine both type of networks into a super-organism able to transfer energy and information with external networks and internal cells.

The key to understand those quantic networks is a proper definition of quantic spatial energy and temporal information, the 2 substances of which all forms of the Universe are made. Let us resume its opposite properties:

*|-Space =Max. Linearity= Max. Continuity= Max. Energy =Max. Movement=Min. Form= Field/limbs x*

*O-Time=Max.Cyclicality=Max.Quantification=Max.Information=Max.Stillness=Min.extension=*

*Ø-hyperbolic Wave whose cycles combine both*

Thus all systems are composed of 3 clear networks, which correspond in the fractal discontinuous ‘duality’ (remember the 1st isomorphism: ∑e=S, ∑o=T), to the 3 topologies of any 2-dimensional Non-Euclidean space-time:

* A**ll known scalar space-times being can be reduced to those 3 bidimensional networks/organ s.*

**A bit more detailed, complex analysis. Non Euclidean Topologies.**

Now we have summarized both, the ‘continuous’ and discontinuous vision of the 3 topologies of the Universe. We could also do an abstract analysis of it, with mathematical topologies. It would though be a bit complex and specialized. So we will try to introduce rigor with less abstraction. Consider the graph that started this post.

We drew the 3 ‘type’ of Non-Euclidean topologies which make up below the different species. It is those organic’ real species what matter to us. the parts above though guide us for the generalization of the isomorphism (hence the importance of formal sciences to ∆ST, and the postulates of non-Euclidean topology studied in sub posts attached to this one).

Enough to say that the toroid geometry is called by his authors Lobachevski and Belgrami, the hyperbolic goes by the name of Klein, and the spherical is called a ‘Riemann sphere’. They are the limbs/fields, bodies/waves and spheres (external membranes and central zero points) that make all of us.

In fact in embryology they are produced exactly by the 3 ‘ectoderm’, (the membrane and brain) endoderm (the guts that devour energy) and mesoderm (the muscles and body) parts of the fetus.

So the 2nd isomorphism is enormously important to understand all kind of systems of nature.

Indeed, the 3 topologies of a 2-dimensional space are the 3 zones of any being of the Universe*.*

The capacity to describe all space-times of our Universe that those 3 regions have is ‘absolute’ as Topology, a branch of mathematics that classifies all possible space-times, has discovered.

Since all possible forms of a 2-dimensional space can be reduced to those 3 zones that build the quantic geometry of any form of reality, whose inner parts can be transformed into the 3 bidimensional forms. The graph shows how any form becomes a bidimensional zone through topographic symmetries:

– A sphere or volume “without holes” becomes a Riemann’s external sphere or membrane connected to a zero-point of perception.

– A hyperbolic or any volume with a hole can be turned into an intermediate plane equivalent to the central Klein disk (if we cut it we have a cylinder that we develop into a plane).

-While a series of limbs attached to the membrane through multiple holes can be turned into a topology with negative curvature and a convex surface, homologous to the central hemisphere of Belgrami. And so our bidimensional Universe is indeed a sum of those 3 Non-E zones with clear geometrical forms and properties.

*The variety of real organic spaces that Non-E geometry explains is enormous. In the graph, an animal, an embryo, an electromagnetic flow, a black hole, a proton, a seed, a planet, a cell and a boson condensate: all of them can be described with the ternary structures of Non-E geometry.*

In the graph, Universal species are space-time fields, structured in 3 Non-E basic formal regions:

- A central, very quantized, evolved, ‘future’ zone, dominant on temporal
*information*. Which invaginates into ‘informative networks’ that spread throughout the other zones, connected to the external membrane that isolates the being and acts as the sensorial element which transfers without tear and deformation the information to its center. - A relative, simpler,
*energetic*, ‘past’ zone of lineal structures with little information and a lot of energy. Either and external field or attached dual limbs that move the system. - An inner,
*reproductive*region of mixed S-T quanta, which perform the 2 arrows of the universe of the system, mixing external energy coming from the membrane and internal information from the center to create new informative and energetic quanta, specific to the space-time field. It has often the topic hyperbolic ‘central tube’, as in all animals which derive from earlier hydras (in your case the tub that enters your mouth and exists your anus, which is formed already in the ‘blastocoel’ embryonic phase of development by ‘invagination’, an essential procedure of ‘topological surgery’ that allows to transform a topology in other variety in the dynamic Universe

As points evolve and develop specific structures, they become ‘*invaginated’ by energy and information networks* departing from the outer and inner regions of the point that spread through the intermediate zone to control the S-T quanta, creating in this manner the morphological varieties we observe in the Universe, which however can be reduced to the previous functional elements.

Those 3 zones are homologous in form and function to the 3 internal parts of most real fields, from the cell to the human organism, from an atom to a star to a galaxy, which have an informative center, an energetic membrane and an intermediate zone.

For example, the human being is a non Sp space-time with 3 inner networks-dimensions:

- The physiological networks of nervous information derived from the ectoderm membrane.
- The energetic gut, the digestive system of energy feeding with its toroid immense number of ex-vaginations which are in fact a kilometer long to absorb water from the ‘hole’ of the hyperbolic.
- The muscle and blood network and organs, the essential hyperbolic with the heart at its centers, another hyperbolic with tubes coming in and out. This are the blood and endocrine systems that combines energy and information, to which are attached a number of ‘space-time’ cellular quanta that reproduce all kind of glandular substances, creating together a human being.

While a nation is also a sum of human quanta, (its citizens), joined by networks of energy and information (legal, religious and cultural networks and economic systems).

In the graph we show the Non-E structure of Universal species according to those 3 quantic zones:

*– Tƒ: The singularity of max. quantic information:* the knot of quantic information ‘or brain’ of the system is located in the center or z-axis: it is the spin axis of atomic particles, the seed of fruits, the crystalline nucleus of a planet, the DNA spiral of cells, the height dimension where bosons condensate in matter, the spinal chord of the nervous system in living beings, the genetic nucleus of the embryo, the yolk in the egg, the axis of any electrical current, the vortex of the black hole in the galaxy, the nucleus of the atom…

*– Tƒ: The continuous membrane of max. sensorial perception that also displays great strength and* limits and isolates the system. The Non-E point reaches its max. extension, structural hardness and sphericity (that is, the maximal curvature of its cycles) in the inner zero point and external surface of the sphere, the skin that expels sweat energy waste and absorbs information in contact with the external organic territory of the point.

We use a small o for the zero-point a big O for the membrane.

This duality *of a zero point and a membrane of information proved unique by the Poincare Conjecture of topology (the sphere is the only variety that can sink without deformation, thus creating in the zero mind, crystal, brain, a mapping of the external Universe) is the MOST IMPORTANT PART OF REALITY IN ALL SYSTEMS. So we dedicate the 0(10th in the count) isomorphism to its study.*

Some examples of those membranes are the electron orbital in the atom, the skin of the tomato, the crust of the planet, the membrane in the cell, the placenta of the embryo or the halo of dark energy and matter in the galaxy.

- Spe; The limbs or cilia or fields of energy, toroid, made of multiple similar parts, external to the system, sometimes attached but often ‘rescindable’, the less important part in contact with the lower ∆-4 force that moves and accelerates and decelerates the system.

*– ST: *And between both limits, the intermediate space-time filled *with reproductive, cellular quanta* that combine energy bites and information, absorbed from the external world by the other 2 regions. They are the cells of the body, the stars of the galaxy, the carbohydrates of the cell, the planetary magma, the pulp of the seed or the electromagnetic forces that circulate within the atom.

And it has *a hole tube, an aperture, MOST LIKELY A POLAR one, which crosses through the system, and might bring food to the linen of energetic ‘cells’ ‘atoms’ (iron cores that absorb gravito-magnetic forces) or in more informative species, pixels of form to a central mind (crystals).*

And so we start to see also a fundamental *element of the 2 isomorphism, the patterns of differentiation and speciation along the ‘1st isomorphic Se<>Tƒ distinction’.*

Thus *all Non-E points are ‘inner worlds’ whose discontinuity defines an External Universe or* outer world from where the point obtains its energy and information. Since most points, despite being discontinuous, have in their external membrane several generic openings or ‘senses’ joined to the informative networks or ‘brains’ and energetic, ‘digestive networks’ of the superorganism:

*– Max. +Sp: A* ‘*mouth*‘ or opening that absorbs energy.

*-Max. -Sp: A* ‘*cloaca*‘, through which the cyclical body expels its temporal energy.

–*Max.+Tƒ: An* ‘*eye*‘ through which the informative center receives external information.

–*Max. -Tƒ: And an* ‘*antenna*‘, through which it emits information.

Those apertures vary in their number, location and size, depending on the form of the point. In the simplest, initial spherical ‘seeds’ of most species, they are mostly situated in 3 regions:

*– Max. Sp*: The Equator of the system, through which the membrane absorbs energy

*– Sp=T*: The Tropics, in systems that use the same opening to emit and absorb temporal energy.

*– Max.T*: The Poles or points of confluence between the membrane and its central informative region of height, which hits perpendicularly the membrane on those poles. North and South Poles orientate anti-symmetrically, acting as 2 relative, negative and positive apertures, communicated by the height dimension of the singularity or Belgrami hemisphere. Thus the Positive Pole absorbs temporal energy that crosses through the central singularity where it is absorbed and ejected to the intermediate region where it is re-elaborated before its emission through the negative Pole.

Some examples of those apertures are the senses, the sunspots, the magnetic poles of a planet or black hole*, *the spin or radius of a particle, etc.

Now we want to end this introduction with the study of another basic Se<Tƒ>Se Duality, the dynamic transformation of cyclical spherical systems into lineal ones, which keep the 3 parts. first a general case, then a specific one.

# ∆¡≈1,2. HUMAN SYSTEMS

**Gender diffeomorphism women are hyperbolic waves, men are entropic particles.**

__ __

*In a Universe made of an infinite number of time arrows that gather together into ‘complementary knots’ of Entropy and information, each being is a relative fractal Universe, which we call a ‘world’ or ‘space-time being’ that deploys its particular ‘directions of height-information’, ‘length-Entropy’ and ‘width-reproduction’, different from those of other beings. All those fractal Universes interact through its particular, ‘local’=diffeomorphic coordinates, which departing from a central Non-Euclidean Point of view, or relative ‘self’, establish the 3 relative, perpendicular, minimal dimensions of any fractal world that signal its arrow of Entropy, information and reproduction.*

The first and most important emergence of properties of lower scales, is the emergence of the 3 axis through which the entity expresses departing from its point of view with ‘will’, the 3 arrows of informative perception, energetic motion and reproductive growth. The 4 arrow doesn’t need a four spatial dimension because it is the point of view, which uses an internal language and ‘algorithm’ of choice to alternate action in each of the 3 dimensions of spatial existence.

Thus there will be a point of view that directs the whole system, with the aim of achieving maximal reproduction, by switching between the arrow of informative perception and Entropy taking, in order to accumulate enough of it and reproduce more cells in the dimension of width/reproduction.

This happens in the two fundamental forms of the Universe:

- The radial form, with the informative point in the center; which corresponds to forms dominant in information and minimal motion.
- The bilateral, lineal form, with the head in the direction of motion, which corresponds to lineal energetic systems.
- Most often though species can switch between both forms and they do so in rhythms of Sp->O, from the Sp(day)>O(sleep), extended>coiled position, to the 3 ages of galaxies which evolve from extended nebulae to implosive spirals that end up in a 3
^{rd}globular age.

In the graph, 3 diffeomorphic beings and its relative arrows of Entropy and information: a galaxy with an inward arrow of gravitational information, pointing towards the central informative black hole; a tree and a man, whose informative/energetic dimensions are inverted. Since plants use light as Entropy and animals use it as information. So the informative direction of animals is up, towards the head that absorbs visual information from the sky, opposite to the informative arrow of plants, which is down, towards the roots that absorb chemical information.

Both have their space-time parameters inverted, as often happens between Entropy victims (in the graph, plants) and their anti-forms or predators (animals). Such Entropy/information, relative past/future inversions happen in all Universal systems. For example, they happen between a ‘particle’ and its ‘antiparticle’, which in a Feynman diagram have also inverted coordinates of space-time, as the antiparticle travels to the past. They also happen in mental, linguistic codes that represent that external reality. For example, eviL=death is the exact inverse word of Live. Since indeed, for a living human being, there is no bigger eviL than death.

Yet, death, a release of Entropy that kills is the inverse function of information, the arrow of life. So the linguistic, spatial inversion of words corresponds also to an inversion of time arrows – a fact that explains scientifically the biologic meaning of ethics. Since humanity, history and religion are a sociological space-time that obeys the same homological isomorphisms of Multiple Spaces-Times. Thus each species establishes its own up and down arrows; its relative Entropy and informative directions, departing from that central knot of information, which is gauging and perceiving.

What classic science denies and system sciences proves is the reality of an existential will in that perceptive Sp=I Informative knot, which controls the entire organism and directs its search for ‘åctions’ that provide Entropy and information to the being. It is precisely the infinite number of Discontinuous, Non-Euclidean Points of View, what creates a general arrow of Information in the Universe that constantly reproduces the form of those entities and balances the arrow of continuous entropy, Entropy motions and expanding space, which physicists dogmatically consider the only arrow of the Universe.

According to the Principle of Correspondence, any new theory has to include the previous theories within it and solve the questions unresolved by all those previous theories. Since the XX C. theory of space-time is Relativity, it is unavoidable, to explain the Principle of Local Relativity from the perspective of the Time Arrows of each species.

Relativity establishes that in any point of the Universe the coordinates of the entity (the up and down, right or left directions) are different from those of any other point of the Universe, as they only depend on what happens in that local region of space/time. This is only possible if space/times are fractal, discontinuous, broken into infinite points of view that gauge and map the information of reality from its own perspective.

Relativity thus is at the core of the structure of the fractal reality and must be considered the right step into the process that has taken the knowledge of multiple space-times from Leibniz’s analysis of relational space-time to this book, which generalizes all those findings to all disciplines and species.

According to Relativity what happens in a point of space-time doesn’t affect what happens in other isolated, discontinuous point. Each space-time fractal is a Relative Universe=World in itself. Thus the isomorphisms of space-time apply locally to each fractal ‘species, superorganism or world’ that will reflect those isomorphisms in its own structure. We are local, ‘diffeomorphic’ species; our time-space coordinates are relative. Time wrinkles our vital space in the process of aging with different speeds, depending on our content of Entropy and information.

Hence the diffeomorphic principle also establishes different informative cycles – the multiple ‘clocks’ of Nature that show different speeds and locations. Yet since space is synonymous of Entropy and time synonymous of information, we can establish the local coordinates of space-time of each being by establishing its relative informative and energetic arrows – its relative body and head – using the invariant Isomorphisms and dimensions of all spaces and times, *as long as we can localize the origin of those arrows; that is, the Non-Euclidean point of view, where the will of the Entity ‘exists’*.

Some geometrical tips about the location of those points in any superorganism or world should guide researchers:

– The point will be a relative ‘unmoved’ Aristotelian God, cause of the motions of all the other elements of the organism.

– The point has the max. density of information and the max. number of connections with all the parts of the organism.

– The point is either in the center or top of the organic system.

– The point is a spherical or convex, informative shape.

Thus in a human being the point of maximal will is in the eye-brain system, on top, with spherical (eye) and convex (brain form), which has the maximal connections with the rest of the body (nervous axons), the maximal density of information and it is the part of the organism which maintains more often a still position (balanced by the negative sensation of vertigo.)

In a historic organism, the point will be the capital, most likely in the zone of maximal communication of the nation – a coastal port, like London, Amsterdam, Rome or Athens or a central city like Madrid, Moscow, Mexico.

In a cell the point is in the center, with max. DNA information. In a galaxy, the point is in the center, where a swarm of black holes control from its unmoved position the motion of stars.

Indeed, according to the ‘Diffeomorphic Principle of Relativity’, every fractal space-time is independent of all the others; since it has different spatial and informative orientations. Yet we can recognize its informative and energetic organs in relationship to each other, since both will respond to the opposite dimensions and morphologies of Entropy and information.

Those isomorphisms of geometry also allow us to study ‘dual’ complementary entities of Entropy and information (Bodies/Brains, fields of forces/particles, energetic victims/ predators), which will create complementary entities that last in time (organisms) or are Darwinian events where the larger, energetic victim is prey of the smaller, informative point.

In the graph, in biological species animals use light as information and so they are ‘informative’, smaller and faster than plants, which use light as Entropy and are ‘big, slow’ beings.

Thus plants are the relative Entropy of animals. Further on, since what it is Entropy for plants is information for animals, both species have opposite Entropy-time coordinates: plants have their brain upside down in their roots that ‘feel’ chemistry; while animals have their brain on top, looking at the light they use as information. In the cosmological scale stars are big, slower than black holes, which rotate faster and have cyclical height.

And the space-time equations of black holes are inverted to those of electromagnetic stars. And so stars are the relative Entropy that feeds and reproduces black holes, which seem to behave as ‘gravitational animals’, species that perceive gravitation as information, which guides its precise movements through the galaxy, in the same way animals perceive light as information. While plants perceive light as Entropy in the same way stars absorb gravitational space-time as Entropy, deforming it with their masses.

That cosmological homology defies the anthropomorphic myth that only humans perceive the information they gauge. That religious myth, which denies the sentient, intelligent nature of the Universe, is today a dogma of ‘mechanist science’. So it will not be easily accepted by the self-centered ‘Galilean paradox’ of Humans, who always will think to be the center of the Universe. And since science is a human endeavor, ‘enlightenment’ and respect for the sentient Universe will not happen soon. Yet only a theory that affirms the existence of will in all knots of information that control from its unmoved position reality explains the role of black holes in the galactic ecosystem.

The discontinuity and minuscule size of informative points, due to its opposite properties to those of space, makes them difficult to localize by science, and our incapacity to ‘perceive’ the internal mind/world of the point makes easier to deny them. Indeed, all mountains have a single point of discontinuity in its informative height.

And so you have also two single points of will in your complex visual/verbal I=eye-world: the nervous point that connects both eye-visions which determines your rhythm of space and time (the size we perceive as normal given by the eye vision and the rhythm of our human time, a second per thought, equal to the rhythm of perception of the eye, which winks every second); and a yet unknown cell, probably a Purdinke cell in the limbic system that defines our emotional åctions, the will of our body.

Those points are stillness, as it is in your eye, to ‘focus’ and create a map of linguistic information, which will guide the åctions of the point. And so a basic beat of the Universe appears in all systems; a rhythm of:

*Stillness (perception) ->action(motion searching Entropy/form)*

For example, in Relativity, this dual beat explains the Michelson experiment, without the need for the *never proved postulate of a limit of c-light speed in the Universe, today clearly shown false by experimental evidence (non–local gravitation, quasars expelling matter at 10 C, dark Entropy flows, quantum tunneling, the spooky effect of entanglement, etc.). *In classic relativity this limit was needed because classic physicists considered that the electron was in motion when it emitted light, and so they had to add the speed of the electron and the speed of light. In fractal relativity the electron ‘stops’ when it emits information (the light frequency) then moves and so motions do not add since when the electron emits information is always in the particle/still/informative state.

And so the Postulate of a c-speed limit is not required. This dual stop and go process is also evident in film: the celluloid stops to let pass the light and create an image in the screen even if we perceive it in constant motion by adding all the stills, as we add from the human point of view, all the stops and goes of the electron that emits the light observed in the Michelson experiment in a single flow of motion.

The existence of an information arrow explains also the paradox of informative, evolving, life species in a Universe that seems in energetic expansion:

If we are external to a certain diffeomorphic space-times its directions do not affect us, but if we are inside a certain space-time, as in the case of the galaxy, then the direction of information or Entropy of that macro-being becomes the direction of Entropy or information of our ecosystem.

Indeed, there is more information in the center of the galaxy, and since the Earth moves towards that center, this planet increases its information towards the future in its relative discontinuous galactic space-time, regardless of what happens in the Universe as a whole, which seems to be ruled by the opposite arrow of big-bang expansion and entropy. This subtle change of paradigm caused by the discontinuity of space-time (from a world ruled by entropy to a galaxy ruled by information) has in fact enormous consequences to our daily life and explains the contradiction between the arrow of life and evolution, local to this planet, and the arrow of Entropy and entropy proper of the intergalactic space.

Since here in this galaxy space doesn’t expand but time-information contracts it through the ‘will’ of informative black holes of mass and in this planet, through the ‘will’ of living beings. As Woody Allen put it in Annie Hall: ‘Brooklyn is not expanding^{’.} I recall to ask Mr. Hawking in a conference at the Astronomy Institute of Madrid this same question, when at seventeen I was starting to doodle with the first principles of Multiple Spaces-Times Theory: ‘why space is not expanding between you and me?’ He wondered for a minute or so and responded ‘next question’.

Einstein had only to go a step further in his analysis of the curvature of time, closing times into cycles that return to its origin. Then time becomes multiple, one for each closed cycle and the space-time continuum becomes the sum of all the vital space-times of each knot of Time Arrows. Einstein hinted at it when he affirmed that time was local, ‘diffeomorphic’ and had ‘different speeds’ and the universe had ‘infinite clocks of time’. Indeed, each of those local times ‘curves the Entropy of space’, creates masses and forces of in-form-ation that establish a 2^{nd} arrow for the Universe, besides the arrow of Entropy/entropy – the arrow of fractal information. Since a cycle needs 2 directions to close into itself and create its broken form.

*Recap*. There are ∞ fractal space/time fields that constantly adapt their organic, moving dimensions to the directions of their relative Entropy and temporal information, conditioning the existence of its micro-cells; and so the galaxy conditions the arrows of time of its cellular sun and human beings of maximal information; while plant which obtain only Entropy of the sun have inverted parameters to those of animals.

**TEMPORAL PERSPECTIVE: **

**2-MANIFOLDS AS MOTIONS**

**MOTIONS AS ACTIONS.**

So as the being exits, it moves in discontinuous steps which displace it along one of those ∆ Time≈space symmetries that make ‘time move, change’, reality vary.

We can then talk of 3 x 2 motions=actions which are either performed by the being, for a *larger ∆+I * being, or the being ‘moves’ its parts or other entities to obtain locomotion, energy and information, from other scale of reality…

**Motions from the perspective of ‘cones’ of past, present and future.**

along the inverse dimensions of ∆, S, and T. So motions to the past or energy motions, motions to the future or informative motions, motions upwards into wholes or social motions, motions backwards dissolving a whole or dissolution-death motions, and motions along space deceleration, acceleration, steady speed, conform the 5 canonic type of motions first analysed by Aristotle, which talked of generation, reproduction and extinction (the 3 motions of time), locomotions in space (±a), and growth and diminutions, ±∆.

What we call life or existence is thus a series of displacements through those dimensions of ∆st.

Combinations of those motions is causal series form the time space symmetries, which we know as events of existence, and the sum of them all is the most important ∆ timespace symmetry or cycle of existence and its topological/age symmetry, move a certain domain of interrelated, network-connected, organic group, the system resembles more and more to a super organism

Existence is thus a travel through the metric of ∆ST and its 3X3 planes, topologies and ages of 5D space- time.

Existence is motion through growth and diminution of Size in scalar planes of the 5th dimension.

Existence is exchange of energy and information through the 3 topologies of Space, and ages of time.

So we exist as we move through the 9-dimensional Universe as a ‘whole being’, a 0-point with a territory or body-wave, which exchanges energy and information with the environment trying to grow and evolve and absorb energy and information, as we ‘travel through those scales of size, change our topologies towards higher information and become older. We exist tracing worldcycles of life and death through those dimensions of scale, space and time.

To exist is to travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension, as systems are born as seminal seeds that reproduce, self-organise and emerge into a larger scales, as wholes, parts of ecosystems and worlds, in which the being will find its flows of energy and information to perform its actions. In this manner, motion after motion, through the space-time cycles of existence a being in any scale of reality ‘feels energy and perceives information’, fulfilling its Nature, internally, and externally.

We have till now used the Generator equation and its 3 parts, in time and space to describe the super organism either in space:

|-Spe (limb/field) > Ø-ST(wave-body) < O-Tiƒ (head-particle)

or in time, reversing the symmetry, so Sp (spatial entropy) becomes Ps (past arrow), ST (space-time field) becomes preSenT and Tƒ becomes Ft, future. So we can write the same equation as:

Ps (past-entropy arrow maximal in limbs/fields)> ST-Present iterative arrow of waves-bodies >Ft (future informative arrow)

Those two clear definitions of a system as a super organism or as a world cycle of existence, complementary and symbiotic to each other, however fail to explain the day to day actions in space-time of the super organism, its details which accumulated create the being.

For that reason we talk of a general ‘function of existence’, which we write with different acronyms, of which the most obvious one is exi (s≈t), where we show the 2 fundamental elements of all actions, spatial energy and temporal information, and the fundamental point of balance, s=t, in which the best actions that reproduce both elements occur. Or in a more analytic way:

å (symbol of action in existential logic, as all actions, a, are performed from the point of view, or will of a fractal point or mind, above the system, in the dimension of height-information with cyclical form: °)

≈ ∫±∆e,i,exi (the total action of a being is the integral of all its exchanges of energy and information and reproductive acts, exi).

=û (which finally integrate with other equal reproduce beings, into a whole, which results in the creation of a ‘Universal’, philosophical term for a whole made of individuals).

In terms of the 5 canonical actions of beings, we talk of the a,e,i,o,u of existence:

±∆æ: actions of emission of energy or accelerations, a and actions of absorption of energy or feeding, e.

±∆ï: actions of absorption of information or perception, +∆i, and emission of information or communication, – ∆i, which together form the dual ï-nformtive actions.

exi=œ: actions of reproduction that combine the energy and information the system creating a new point of existence, œ,o.

û=∫œ: whose sum will form a Universal that transcends, ˆ, as a new social plane.

So we use mnemotecnic symbols, which now might seem cumbersome but as the future of science gets to learn 5D will be useful for a guide in what will become an encyclopaedia of all forms of knowledge, as a template to introduce all data. Since all systems *express the function of existence through different languages and codes of information that code from the point of view of the mind-system, å, the program of survival of the Universe.*

So we need a 3rd canonical formula to express the structure of a system, and that is the one we use to study the program of survival of an organism that ‘exists’ through a series of exchanges of energy and information with the environment, designed to maximise, grow and multiply its body and head. So we can redefine the system in a more ‘synoptic’, descriptive, morphological way as a system, which has a cyclical head, To, a body of energy and information that reproduces both, exi, extending over a field of balanced energy and information, or territory from where it extracts its bits and bites:

To (spherical, informative head-particle) < ExI (reproductive body-wave) < S=T (External field, territory it preys on).

In this description of the system we highlight the energy-information structure of the body and the balance it seeks with its environment (S=T) in order to maximise its existence, through exchanges of spatial energy and temporal information, based in a series of actions of communication of energy and information, which integrated, become the whole world cycle of the being:

∫Å=∑a,e,i,o=û

Whereas we mean that the being can also be considered not as a whole in time – a world cycle, but as a series of derivative space-time actions performed with its 3 spatial organs, To, exi and s=t. So in this description we put together a spatial, existential description of the 3 parts of the being, To<exi<s=t, which is also the acronym of the function of existence in space, equivalent to the function o existence in time as the sum of a series of partial space-time actions.

So if the whole being is a superorganism that traces a world cycle of existence, in the day to day, the being is a ternary system of energy and information, guided by the head, which preys on a world of energy and information and through a series of present space-time actions, *FEELS EXISTENCE ITSELF.*

**The clocks of nature. Its purpose: to process the information of each species.**

WE ARE ALL SPACE-TIME BEINGS, TRAVELLING THROUGH SCALES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION.

So when we say ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this’ we mean it – *we are entities made of space-time cycles, which we ‘inform’ with our actions of existence, carried about in a larger world also made of **space-time cycles of a larger scale of the fractal Universe*:

Since I was young what call my attention was Nature as it is, not the human description of it, with those mechanical Instruments. To me the Universe was both Intelligent and organic, living Nature.

So I was intrigued by those ‘big concepts’, Space and Time, life and death, and the ages between them, Energy and Information, and the way both mixed in the living systems around me. Those were the widest concepts of reality and certainly the definitions I found of them in abstract science did not convince me – there were not really definitions but tautologies and descriptions.

For example, Einstein, who was supposed to be the foremost expert on time, said: ‘Time is what a clock measures’.

But then I wondered, ‘What kind of clock embodies the full meaning of time’?

The clock of the seasons, which animals used to synchronise their reproductive cycles?

The clock of the days, of the Earth rotating, which life used to synchronise its rhythms of activity?

The clock of the stars, of the beats of birds flying? The clock of a flower blossoming and dying? The clock-beats of my heart, which synchronised the rhythms of my eye winks, synchronised to the rhythms of my thoughts – a second?.

Each of those clocks had a different rhythm and the Universe was filled of them. Yet all had certain qualities: to repeat themselves, and hence when described in a trajectory in space; to be closed cyclical paths, hence with form, and frequency the 2 properties of information – so we will call them all Tiƒ. And to work in harmony, in synchrony, as certain clocks were chained to larger clocks, forming complex patterns of information. Time clocks and information therefore were intimately related.

**III. PHYSICAL SCALES.**

**THE 5 MOTIONS OF A WORLDCYCLE REDUCED TO LOCOMOTION IN CLASSIC PHYSICS.**

*‘Using a term like nonlinear science is like referring to the bulk of zoology as the study of non-elephant animals*“. Ulam

*In the graph, a bunch of physicists studying ‘ non-lineal elephants’ (: physical super organisms tracing world cycles :), as a sum of isolated properties, all of them imagined with abstract, Hilbert’s axiomatic method of categorical mathematics, far removed from the non-Euclidean, non-Aristotelian structure of the Fractal Universe. In essence, physicists, reduce the 6 changes in time=motions that form a world cycle (generation>evolution>entropic, moving youth> reproductive maturity>informative 3rd age>entropic death), represented here by 6 blind physicists, into a single one, ENTROPIC ‘young’ locomotions and its worldlines (which we will show to be partial cases of the reproduction of information carried by a wave), unable to integrate them into a ‘world cycle of existence of physical systems’, which in nothing differs from the 5 organic motions of all other ‘living systems’.*

So a world cycle has 5 motions, where locomotion is the dominant motion of an entropic young system (gaseous, youngster, predator animal).

And so for each species we can study in depth a world cycle through the sequence of its 5 motions and also study each motion as an entire discipline, which is basically what physicists do, as the ‘science of motion’ (definition in the XIX c. of the overblown discipline).

Now, the most important of those motions is reproduction, as the universe is a reproductive fractal, so we could actually consider locomotion also a form of reproduction. Let us then upgrade by the correspondence system the present scientific concept of locomotion, as wave reproduction of form by translation in space.

**REPRODUCTIVE-SPEED.**

**Motion as reproduction of information along the path of a wave.**

The Universe reproduces information. It does both: it erases it with entropic big-bangs, and evolves it with the arrow of informative warping of fields of entropy into vortices of charges and masses.

But *the overwhelming purpose of the Universe is to maintain, conserve and repeat the ‘momentum’ and its integral of energy in all systems of nature. IT is what the Universe preserves.*

For those skeptical readers, in simple terms, *a mathematical fractal is defined by a generator equation, which ‘constantly iterates’, reproducing its form in different scales of reality. And this is exactly what nature does.*

Indeed, it is evident that all biological systems are about reproduction of genetic form in a lower scale of reality (cellular scale), which then reproduces and evolves, ’emerging’ into a higher scale. It is also evident that our historic civilisations are about reproduction of technological information in a lower ‘dimensional scale’ (blue prints for machines), which then ‘company-mothers’ reproduce.

So the big question left to answer is about physical systems, which are supposed to be about ‘motion’.

But motion has always had a difficult paradox, never clearly solved, of continuity called Achilles paradox; which only has a solution if we consider as quantum physics seem to prove that in the scalar Universe, reproduction of form happens in as much as particles travel as waves, and only become particles of information when they ‘stop’, on an instrument of measure, and so a new fundamental equation of speed, which takes into account the fractal structure of reality and the true meaning of ‘light speed’, which is speed of transmission of information solves the paradox: V=S/Ti: that is speed is speed of transmission of information.

For example, you are the vital information which becomes imprinted in changing, indistinguishable CHNO atoms, as your ‘real scale’ of being, is ∆-1, the cellular genetic code; formed with ‘any’ indistinguishable CHNO atom. A wave Motion is the simplest information and moves faster because it need only to print a surface below, and again, the wave form that moves is independents of that indistinguishable lower level. So the wave keeps its form and travels truly fast as the in/form/ation, v=s/ti to imprint, is minimal.

And so there is no need to reproduce a wave of ðime§pace motion below the level of ¥- light ðime§pace the ultimate level that matters in our Universe.

How the simple mathematical reproductions take place in Nature? Obviously through the mathematical proportions of the ternary Universe, as reproduction of information in ternary moving ‘fractal points’ self-centred in the singularity move the system along the path of the point wave.

The graphs illustrate those simple principles and the resulting three fundamental constants of nature, pi, phi and e, which appear constantly because indeed, the universe is a reproductive fractal and those are the equations that define those proportional morons along the pi-phi-path; and its exponential growth through ∆-scales. In the middle we can see a simple example of this ternary pi-phi motion: a proton, intersection of three paths, which expands dynamically one of them to produce an electron, or inversely absorb it.

*Mathematical physics has discovered all those relationships, but lacking a true philosophy of time-space behind it, it just thinks its all ‘magic’ of the ‘language of God’, and feels Ok without answering the whys as we do in GST. Since it has given up to go deeper, or as Feynman infamously put it ‘the why is the only thing physicists do not ask’.*

This is the fact at the bottom of big science who thinks the biggest discovery of physics is to make a picture of ‘God’s particle’, without having any idea of what it is all about, as ‘magic God’s language will provide’ (: and of course the reason 5D will not interest the ‘religion’ of physicists, as it is even blasphemous to reveal ‘the name of God’… the whys of experimental science which are not mathematical only.

Back to the understanding of motion as reproduction of information.

What this means is that motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system, so as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases. So as we humans *perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we **have *to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process).

Thus light merely warps the entropy of the lower scale-field, ∆-1, which is invisible gravitation to us and hence must have less information and more speed, as experiment prove (gravitational non-local, invisible action at distance, due to the lack of human detectable information, which gives a speed for the quantum potential field/gravitational field of: v -> s/ti≈0 -> s/0=∞):

In the graph, the new ‘foundational equation of speed’ for the fractal paradigm: V=Space-distance/Temporal Information, is embedded in relativity and recognised in the concept that the speed of light is really a limit of speed of transmission of ‘human perceivable’ information.

Wave motion is also reproduction of form in the lower ∆-1 scale of action at distance (gravitation, quantum potential). Thus even motion is reproduction of form as a wave of information over a simpler scale of space-time. It solves the paradox of a Achiles – the wave reproduces its form in a series of discontinuous steps. It also explains why indeed the Universe is a fractal that reproduces as all fractals do, its form in a lower scale of reality which then reproduces into a wave-train that collapses into a particle (physical systems), or a seed that emerges after palingenesis into an ambulatory trillion cells systems (biological systems), or into an idea or patent of an instrument that a company-mother of machines will re=produce in socio-economical systems.

Indeed, when we consider as Steane wanted a Universe from the perspective of ‘information’ and its ‘conserved present momentums and energies’, it all becomes simple and philosophically obvious. And so we just must explains the laws of reproduction of information along scales of reality to describe the ‘world cycles’ of existence, no longer worldlines – that is the motions across scales of the fifth dimension, which define all systems of nature.

Yet to fully understand how reproduction of form takes place, we need to understand reproduction across ‘scales’ of size. That is, the meaning of world cycles, just explained, as they require motion from a seminal seed ∆-1, into a larger scale; as opposed to what physicists study with their reductionist model of a single space-time continuum: worldlines.

Since what physicist call time is ONLY one of those 6 motions, locomotion. Indeed, Galileo used a simple lineal time formula to study only ‘locomotions’ in space, which he called speed. So he wrote V=s/t, latter improved by Einstein with the add on of an s=ct, fourth parameter. But that is only locomotion in space. So it ‘reduced’ to a single ‘entropic’, lineal, kinetic arrow of time all the organic motions of the Universe. And now we regain them all and further on prove that locomotion is also organic, reproductive motion in a lower scale of space:

Motion is in more profound terms, the ‘repetition’ of a form several times over the same place, which creates a ‘density of form’.

Now all this concepts can be easily related to each other, as the reproduction of form produces in a single point of perception a frequency of time and as such it can be perceived from an external point of view that integrates the iterative function as a form in time (tic or frequency of reproduction) or a form in space (tic of the system in space, perceived as each tick lasts, as a single wave with a dispersion that increases with the speed of reproduction of the wave.

This simple law with profound applications in quantum physics describes each wave of time, either as a population of simultaneously living (such as the speed of reproduction/ duration of each particle point in time=memorial inertia in time), or as a being reproducing in waves.

Thus form is THE REPETITION, the REPRODUCTION of motion.

The profundity and implications of this fact, to explain all kind of phenomena, from the quantum complementarity of waves and particles, to the paradoxes Zeno will become evident as we go along, and solve some of the most striking paradoxes of Philosophy of Science that dates from the times of the Greeks.

What matters now OF QUANTUM PHYSICS is to understand two things:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

A particle is just the next plane, ∆, of an ∆-1 wave, which reproduces through a relative lower, ∆-1 field. And as it does it moving to the past and emerging into the contiguous, adjacent present it seems to move. But *motion is reproduction! of a wave of form*.

And it is in present, because it has traveled back to the past, descended a scale to seminal state in the adjacent region, where it has reproduced, literally.

So motion to the past and the future do happen in the ‘perceived’ present 3 scales of a super organism. It is like when we talk on the phone, the voice is translated to a faster, smaller electromagnetic wave that moves and seems to be after ‘reproducing’ the wave over the vacuum, or through the electric wire, to happen in present time, with no space between us.

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental dual function of beings, is that a wave is a present reproductive motion and a particle an |- field of energy x O-particle of information, or ‘momentum’, a past x Future state.

Here the advances of Mathematics, with its concept of ‘metric’, solve it: Klein defined motion as a ‘group translation’, symmetry. So motion is a ‘reproduction of form’ in the adjacent region of space. A mirror symmetry, which happens in the adjacent region of reality.

This is clear in the wave state of the system that reproduces its form as it goes along its path. And it implies that a system with lesser information, form, takes shorter in repeating its form along its path of ‘present, repetitive motion’. So light with minimal form is much faster than particles and human beings.

And hence we can deduce the fastest, infinite non-local speed of invisible gravitation with no form: V=S/Tƒ (understood here as cyclical motion-form). Since gravitation has no information, T here is 0, hence, speed is v=s/o = ∞, non-local, as perceived by a human observer.

Motion thus will ultimate appear as the reproduction of form, of information. And we shall return to it. What matters at this point is to realize that the marriage of mathematical, conceptual and precise definitions of the dimensions of time and space and the metric of the 5th dimension are powerful tools to explain an infinite number of questions of all sciences and unify them, ultimately departing from that simple beat, S<T>S<T (where < is an expansive motion, and > and implosive, informative one, a past to future, future to past, through present space rhythms).

**The reproduction of presents: conservation laws of the Universe.**

Now the fundamental principle of reality is what we have so far explained: the Universe is a fractal that reproduces the motions and forms of all its parts constantly, substituting those forms that become worn and erased by similar new forms.

And this essence of reality is a Universal mandate, the program that all systems coded in all languages follow. So humans were told in the bible ‘grow and multiply’, that is iterate your fractal (multiply) in a lower scale and the reproduce, evolve, grow and emerge as a new being. All systems do grow and multiply, reproducing, iterating its information, from the simplest moving particle-wave (both quarks and electrons do absorb energy and reproduce) to the largest galaxy through all biological beings.

It is then very important to harmonize and translate into each jargon of science and culture the common laws of reality.

For example, we said that Nature’s fractals basically reproduce their information and that is the essence of the Universal game. But when dealing with physics, this ‘biological jargon’ sounds strange. So the proper jargon will be that of the ‘conservation laws of energy and information’ related to the isotropic and isomorphic nature of time and space (Noether’s theorem), and the ‘co-invariance’ laws of space-time ‘observed together’ (the so called Minkowski’s formalism). Now it would be pedantic and reductionist to explain such a ‘larger’ law – the purpose of reality, to iterate fractal information, to the specific application of this law to physics. So how we resume all these laws of conservation and relate it to the reproductive nature of reality?

Simple enough: The Universe conserves its presents. A present is precisely a reality that seems not to change because it repeats itself. What repeats a present is the lineal and cyclical motions and forms of space and time. So the reproduction of the same forms and motions of space-time means the conservation of ‘present space-time’, the wave-body-reproductive class of physical, biological and social systems. Then we can derive from this fundamental principle: the Universe conserves by iteration the present forms of reality, all other principles of conservation which means the isotropism and isomorphism of space on one side and time on the other, which means he conservation of closed pays of space-time as energy and information.

Because the Universe has motion, ultimately all this means that the Universe is the sum of infinite motions and all of them will end up closing a time cycle, or becoming absorbed as a part by a larger reality closing its space-time cyclical actions.

## The world cycle of PHYSICAL EXI=ST¡ences**. **

**Recap. Basic dualities of relational space-time:**

**|-S.** lineal space dimensions.

Tƒ<**Se**: Spatial energy (lineal motion);

Se>**Tƒ**: Temporal In-form-ation;

**Tƒ**: cyclical time clocks.

Ternary Symmetry of space and time:

In this more precise definition Time is motion and has 3 ‘ages’ or types of motion.

Space is static form, an infinitesimal, present quanta of tie, and it has 3 ‘forms’. And there is a direct symmetry between the motion states of time and the spatial forms, such as:

- <; Entropic, lineal expansive, energetic time motions or past, have lineal, field/limb forms in space.
- >; Future informative, cyclical, time-clock motions have spherical, circular forms/functions in space
- ≈; And its combination, present, repetitive motions have ovoid, hyperbolic wave and body forms.

The interaction in the complex model of the 3 spatial forms and temporal motions-functions, is the ‘fundamental space-time’ elements that define all systems of Nature, including physical systems.

So now we can expand our definition that ‘time is a cyclical motion and space a lineal open motion’. And affirm that:

“All what exists is a combination of open’ vital’ spaces, enclosed by membrane-like Time cycles, which are centered in a fractal particle –point that gauges and process energy and information from its relative still frame of reference’.”

Now the precise definitions in physical space of those elements in the ∆-space time perceived by man is immediate, as Planck Length x Planck Time (angular frequency, ƒ) has the value of c-speed:

What this means is that the wave Space-time, present state of the Universe we live in, the wave that reproduces the information of the Universe in its minimal form and entropy (angular frequency and length) is c-speed, our light space-time.

Light is composed of cyclical time, angular frequency and lineal space, length. And it sets the limit of maximal speed of reproduction of in-form-ation in the Universe: light is form-in-motion, in-form-ation.

**Motion as reproduction of form.**Motion is in more profound terms, the ‘repetition’ of a form several times over the same place, which creates a ‘density of form’. Thus form is THE REPETITION, the REPRODUCTION of motion.

The profundity and implications of this fact, to explain all kind of phenomena, from the quantum complementarity of waves and particles, to the paradoxes Zeno will become evident as we go along, and solve some of the most striking paradoxes of Philosophy of Science that dates from the times of the Greeks.

What matters now OF QUANTUM PHYSICS is to understand two things:

– Particles do NOT move. They are the stop point of the wave.

A particle is just the next plane, ∆, of an ∆-1 wave, which reproduces through a relative lower, ∆-1 field. And as it does it moving to the past and emerging into the contiguous, adjacent present it seems to move. But *motion is reproduction! of a wave of form*.

And it is in present, because it has travelled back to the past, descended an scale to seminal state in the adjacent region, where it has reproduced, literally.

So motion to the past and the future do happen in the ‘perceived’ present 3 scales of a super organism. It is like when we talk on the phone, the voice is translated to a faster, smaller electromagnetic wave that moves and seems to be after ‘reproducing’ the wave over the vacuum, or through the electric wire, to happen in present time, with no space between us.

Now the more complex explanation of this fundamental dual function of beings, is that a wave is a present reproductive motion and a particle an |- field of energy x O-particle of information, or ‘momentum’, a past x Future state.

Here the advances of Mathematics, with its concept of ‘metric’, solves it: Klein defined motion as a ‘group translation’, a symmetry. So motion is a ‘reproduction of form’ in the adjacent region of space. A mirror symmetry, which happens in the adjacent region of reality.

This is clear in the wave state of the system that reproduces its form as it goes along its path. And it implies that a system with lesser information, form, takes shorter in repeating its form along its path of ‘present, repetitive motion’. So light with minimal form is much faster than particles and human beings.

And hence we can deduce the fastest, infinite non local speed of invisible gravitation with no form: V=S/Tƒ (understood here as cyclical motion-form). Since gravitation has no information, T here is 0, hence, speed is v=s/o = ∞, non local, as perceived by a human observer.

Motion thus will ultimate appear as the reproduction of form, of information. And we shall return to it. What matters at this point is to realize that the marriage of mathematical, conceptual and precise definitions of the dimensions of time and space and the metric of the 5th dimension are powerful tools to explain an infinite number of questions of all sciences and unify them, ultimately departing from that simple beat, S<T>S<T (where < is an expansive motion, and > and implosive, informative one, a past to future, future to past, through present space rhythms).

So we finally turn around the whole scaffolding of sciences, as we shall discover that actually the only arrow of time that was NOT organic of the 6 motions found by Aristotle – locomotion is ALSO REPRODUCTIVE, ORGANIC, SO WE LIVE IN A SENTIENT, LIVING UNIVERSE!!

*Since, what all those physical and biological system want to do is obvious: grow and multiply, that is keep moving and reproducing their information on the process, keep absorbing external exi from the outer world, and when enough of it is swallowed, keep reproducing similar forms, emitting seeds through their polar axis, and keep evolving socially into larger wholes, through networks connected by those poles.*

And to do the 5 actions of existence, ∆±e,ï and ∆œ and ∆û, the systems will use the 3 components, beat them, in different manners, use its axis and equators to emit and absorb energy and information, reproduce through motions in the lower scale in which they feed on entropic fields, and all the other physical things, things do.

The fundamental task of T.Œ becomes then to make sense of all those physical events interpreted as actions of space-time performed by the ternary elements in time and space and across 5D scales of the physical system we describe.

And the first fundamental differentiation we must establish is between the ternary space-time symmetry of a single plane of existence, which follows its rules.

And the inverse asymmetric processes taken place between larger scales and smaller points, between the O and Ä parts of the point, between different 5D scales. Those are the 2 great fields to classify all events of reality. Such as:

Motions as reproductions in a single space-time are part of the wave, present state actions.

Informative shrinking, mapping, feeding, evolving and reproducing are actions that happen across several scales of the 5^{th} dimension.

So 5^{th} dimension motions proper are the bulk of reality. Let us define in those terms the essential actions of physical systems:

**Travels through the 5th dimension. The world cycle of super organisms.**

The 6^{th} isomorphism deals with the analysis of the 3 internal planes-physiological of the 5th dimension as social classes, and its relationship with the 3 external planes of its larger world or ecosystem from where they obtain energy, reproduce with and absorb information. And the 6 motions perform through them to integrate together a worldcycle of existence.

Here we have the general rule that Se-1 fields are the digestive networks and lower class of bits and bites indistinguishable from the upper parts of the system, waves are the reproductive body part of systems, its reproductive, blood networks which is complementary to Tƒ-particles heads, its nervous informative networks.

And both body-wave and head-particle do act together preying on the field (switching into state by the Principle of complementarity, without any relevant expenditure of energy or information). So as a rule body and mind have the same internal clock, in a steady state bit. The mind beats a second wink of an eye thought tuned to the motion of the heart. So for example in quantum physics the particle state is used to absorb or emit transmit faster information with phase wave velocity while as De Broglie proved, the wave state as a group velocity in tune with the particle internal clock are is used to move, and both form the entity ‘proper time’, while the field is the lower energy class relatively unconnected.

Yet the body does have also a steady rate of 1 step per second in its limbs. And so the 6th isomorphism studies also the synchronicities of the different parts of the system and its time clocks, which is the ‘deeper’ level of understanding of a worldcycle system. It is this isomorphism the one I have always enjoyed most, and it is closely related (we might say it is the inverse perspective) with the 3rd isomorphism, which observers in a simplified manner the symmetries between those 3 inner and outer networks and the actions, motions and worldcycle of the being).

As we have studied already the worldcycle on the 3rd isomorphism, we shall here merely consider the ternary stricture of physical systems, in fields-waves and particles, whose inner networks are more clear in solid systems, based in crystal regularities, with a central perfectly regular point of view (atom or cell of atoms) in its centre.

**Aristotle vs. Kepler: The 5 motions of times.**

Indeed due to the reduction of all time motions or ‘changes’, which already Aristotle, the philosopher, classified in 6 types, ‘conception’, ‘change of internal form or evolution’, ‘extinction’, ‘growth in size’, ‘diminution’ and ‘locomotion’ to a single time motion ‘locomotion’, today called ‘translation in space’, physicists reduce time to a parameter that measures exactly and only that – translations in space.

And that would be Ok, if they acknowledge the other forms of time-change as relevant to truth. Yet when Kepler found the laws of locomotion of stars he affirmed, ‘God has waited 5000 biblical years to find an intelligence like his to understand his clockwork’. So for Kepler all knowledge was to know, F=ma.

Now, as Physicists call its Theory of Locomotions, the Theory Of Everything or T.O.E, we shall call the theory of Philosophers of Science, which includes ALL the 6th Times motions of the beings of the Universe, a Theory of the Organic Everything or T.Œ as:

– it includes all things, and all motions, among which the most– 5 of them – have an organic nature (generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction). So we consider the not even found T.O.E, an inorganic simplex, description of physicists with a single lineal time motion a ‘limiting’ reduced version of the larger T.Œ.

Further on as all modern developments in mathematics and physics consider lineal inertial systems, just a short small view of cyclical, accelerated/decelerated systems – such is the case of the pan geometry of Lobachevski, where only for reduced distances space is Euclidean, becoming exponential, hyperbolic for larger ones; of the study of General Relativity and the motions of the galaxy at large scale, where all motions happen in an accelerated galactic vortex, towards its center; in the study of fields; in the study of fractal spaces; in the study of Earth geodesics that only in short distances become planes; in the study of life cycles that only in small moments become invariable, in the study of the theory of Lineal Functions and Analysis, where only in short distances a curve function is approximated by a lineal tangent, etc. etc. we shall consider the lineal concepts of time and space, a limit of a much larger cyclical view of the Universe.

It will then be evident through a survey of the fundamental opposition between the worldview of physicists and Philosophers of science that advanced both opposite worldview of time and space, Galileo vs. Descartes, Newton vs. Leibniz, Darwin vs. Clausius that T..O.E vs. T.Œ gives us a very different outlook of the Universe. One describes only the how of reality, and its small details. While T.Œ gives us the larger whys and the thoughts of God.

The article will first introduce the work of the previous masters in its antinomies and then concentrate in the last of those ‘lineal parts’ of a larger whole, considering the ‘lineal part, the 4th dimensional model of Minkowski, which will turn out to be just a plane of the 5th dimension of infinite scales of size and speeds of time cycles that describe the more general laws of T.Œ with application to all the sciences and worlds of reality.

In the right graph, Galileo’s principle of lineal inertia, derived from his worldly profession. Galileo in fact created lineal time, because he was an artillery master for the Venetian arsenal, earning 1000 golden ducats, an astounding sum for the age, with the job of finding the longest lineal possible trajectory for canon shots (which he found to be alas! not a line but a parabola.

But that didn’t deter him, from proclaiming in his first book called ‘On military instruments’, that his discovery of lineal time would be ‘…of great use to artillery masters, and a delight to philosophers’. It was a worldview that ratified the religious paradigm of Abrahamic religions, in which man had a lineal manifest destiny of progress even higher than that of God, the mind of the Universe, since ‘he was created in the beginning – hence before God himself – above heavens and Earth’.

Now we shall return to the proper definition of time and space in simple terms, from where we shall derive much more meaningful truths about reality:

*‘Times are cyclical, closed motions . Spaces are lineal, open extensions’.*

The concept of cyclical times is not new. On the contrary, as it is evident in the left picture that all time clocks are cyclical, repetitive; the true mystery is how humans are so ‘dumb’, as to deny it in the modern age. Since all Asian cultures, and all western cultures till Galileo, did believe in cyclical times. The word in fact still lingers in the names of our newspapers: ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Times of London’.

Moreover science would not exist if times were not cyclical as ‘scientific laws’ are merely the repetition in time of patterns of behavior and causality. So to deny cyclical times is to deny science, logic and objectivity. But it also means to deny the fundamental particle of the Universe – a being made of space-time cycles that ‘thinks, therefore exists’ as a world in itself.

Now we shall state why biology is the most correct of science. It is not only because the relationships between co-existing scales of the 5^{th} dimension are organic as they exist in simultaneity and must balance and coordinate and synchronize its exchanges of energy and information working together, but because they have the maximal information due to its closeness, and since each scale follows the same laws, it ‘follows’ it does not matter size, scaling, and so the supposed advantage of physics (to study the smallish and largest scales) is irrelevant. On the contrary it introduces paradoxes of perception that made them ‘less correct in their interpretations’ of reality.

Of course, given the paradoxical transformations of the Universe, and the lack of true understanding of its structure by any science, there is a lot of puzzling and ambivalence on the treatment of Energy, as there is in biology with the understanding of the arrow of genetics that carries information from the lower cellular to the larger organic scales as opposed to synchronous motion carried from upper to lower scales, or ‘energy arrow’. And even more in the social organisms, between the re=productive ‘working’, energetic middle class and the informative ‘neuronal’ upper class and how they must manage together a society.

It must be clear though that the confusion is a lack of ‘proper rightful mirrors of information’ on the parameters of the Universe. The Universe has not that confusion. It is paradoxical, dual and ternary in its logic structure, which is NOT the same as confusing. It is rather efficient, and dynamic, vital, so systems are ternary. They tend to have ternary uses and each part can be broken into ternary systems, and they have dual opposite function, entropy vs. mass, limbs vs. heads and so on. But it is because of its efficiency and economicity.

For that reason we must ‘FIRST’ depart from the mathematical formalism and generator equations of the fractal Universe, and coin a language of philosophy of science above any science, and only then when the reader does HAVE a referential language above those of physical, biological and sociological and mental, linguistic systems, the 4 legs of scientific knowledge we will be able to deal with ambiguities in science without being too confusing.

This physicist re the less prepared to accept because they pretend due mainly to its praxis power (as makers of the mechanisms and weapons that dominate our society) that their language is the ‘first’ one, above the scientific method, above the mathematical and logic language sand above all other scales of the 5^{th} dimension – so somewhat to study particles is more important that to study human organism. In this T.Œ differs greatly and considers rightfully the opinion of the triad of geniuses and friends of the beginning of the past century rm. Einstein, Mr. Eddington, who put Einstein in the map with his proof of relativity and Mr. Gödel, his closest, who proved that mathematics is also an empiric science. They were fully aware and often express it in cutthroat sentences disliked by their peers that physicists ‘invent’ by lack of direct evidence many concepts, and simplify Nature, and so organic closer sciences, like biology are the most accurate depicting each scale of reality.

We talk of 2 ‘paradoxes of knowledge’ that affect the upper sciences and lower sciences to the direct biological scale:

– The quantum paradox of uncertainty (the human observer is so huge it affects the observable, making measure uncertain)

– The Antiquantum paradox of social sciences (the human observer is so small and within the social body that the observable, the elites in control of the informative languages of power, bankers with money, politicians and military with laws and weapons affect the observer and bias its message in its favor).

So biological sciences ARE the top sciences in certainty, detail of observation and capacity to be objective, and that is why THEY USE ALL THE LANGUAGES (Mathematic, quantitative measure, verbal logic, bio-logical evolutionary theories) and study ALL the relationships between scales (genetic information, mechanic motion, ecosystems).

And so T.Œ is a Theory of Everything Organic because the Universe is organic. But of course we do USE concepts of all the other sciences, drawing heavily on Physical sciences, and true social sciences, which surprisingly enough will have little to do with academic history but more with art and love (as academia in history hugely biased by the Antiquantum paradox, so nationalism, the belief that the humans species must NOT help each other to survive as a single species as Darwin and the prophets of eusocial love explained in our languages, but must be divided in tribal military groups, so the people-caste of parasites on power, the military and bankers who monopolize the issue of our social languages of power, can have a ‘excuse’ to justify themselves).

Entropy is the proper name for expansive motion, but physicists use it as expressing disorder. Its proper nature as opposed to order or form, is quite accurate. Energy on the other hand is an ‘all encompassing concept’, which puts together lineal and angular momentum, better specific synonymous in physical systems of lineal and cyclical motions. So energy aggregates both and its principle of conservation means the immortality of the Universe as a game that constantly transforms energy into information. Further on energy integrates multiple ‘motions’, multiple momentums, and so as a ‘larger scale concept’ will be related to time, understood as the sum of multiple ‘space-moments’ or ‘steps’ or ‘space-time cycles. We do advance all those ambiguities, for skeptical physicists, though they are not of so much importance at this stage.

Thus the reader should not search for the specific equations used in physics, except when we do specific analysis of this discipline.

In physics in that sense, energy IS both, lineal motion (kinetic energy), cyclical form (potential energy), and its ultimate meaning means merely that our 4 concepts, of entropy(energy), Space, information, time, are constantly transforming into each other. So we would rather write:

“Energy never dies it transforms constantly back and forth, from Spatial Extension into Temporal Form: Sp < =>Tƒ’

Thus Past, is better understood as Sp, Spatial Extension and we shall use that symbol constantly instead to familiarize the reader with the relationship between space and past entropy and future and time-form.

Of course, physicists will not like it. But T.Œ departs not from physical reductionism, but from philosophy of science, and aims to explain much wider principles, regardless of its capacity to enter then into details on each science. Ad Maximal what Physicists call a T.Œ is the search for a unification equation of charges and masses, a trivial result when we understand the 5^{th} dimension, found in other posts of this web. We go well beyond.

While physics is essentially the science of ‘perceiving’ the Universe with technology – time with clocks instead of words, space with telescopes and microscopes instead of eyes – and its langauges of measure – mathematics. But that IS not all what there is to reality.

We shall use thus our larger terms, which will make more complex and ambivalent our general analysis, but far more flexible when we apply those universal logic principles to different disciplines and specific species.

**Clocks of time with 3 different accelerated, decelerated and steady speeds.**

Now to understand 5 Dimensional physics, and the 3 scales of relative ‘size’ and ‘time speed’ of physical systems, the faster, smaller quantum scale; the human, thermodynamic, molecular scale and the larger, slower, gravitational scale, we must start by defining mathematically the metric of the 5th dimension (∆), which encompasses all the relative scales of Spatial size (S) and time speed (Tƒ) that co-exist in the Universe:

Sp x Tƒ = ∆

That is the product of the size of a system and its time speed is constant. So smaller beings cycle faster than larger ones, but as the product of both is constant, we can ‘constantly’ convert one parameter into the other moving through the 5^{th} dimension. The simplest of those motions could be then defined with a simple physical equation, of an accelerated time clock or bidimensional ‘vortex’:

V(t) x R(s) = K

That is the product of the speed of a cyclical vortex and the radius of its cycle is constant, meaning that as we diminish in size, the system accelerates its orbital time clocks. And this holds in the 4 aforementioned scales.

So in the dark world scale, black holes rotate faster, despite being much smaller than stars, reaching c-speed rotary motions on its event horizons.

In the gravitational scale planetary systems move faster the closer they are to the Sun (it is in fact the origin of Kepler’s second law).

In mechanical, thermodynamic systems the skater spins up its turning speed by closing its arms.

In atomic systems the molecule, the atom, the electron and the quark, increase its turning speed and clocks in decreasing amounts.

And vice versa, in all explosive processes of disorder and entropy, in all big bangs of matter, M=E/c2 and bombs, as the explosion expands increasing the entropy and space it occupies, it diminishes its speed till it comes to a halt.

So surprisingly enough, a larger space moves slower in lineal explosive fashion that an ordered cyclical vortex, despite diminishing its size.

*That equation, decomposed sequentially in 3 phases, a first age of max. energy, a second age of balance and a third age of max. information, explains the existential cycle of any space-time field.*

*In a graph with energy vs. information coordinates the 3 ages resemble the geometrical form of a cycle that moves upwards, absorbing energy and information till in its 3rd age looses its temporal energy, collapsing back to its origin. On the right side, the same 3 ages show in the Taoist, Korean flag, where a line is the symbol of continuous yang-energy, which yin-time quantizes into ‘in-form-ation’, from youth to death. Finally the proper way in which all the time clocks of nature act, increasing its frequency on a vortex (mass or charge vortex, galaxy, frequency acceleration as the particle collapses, etc.), of 3 ages towards a point of maximal information when the system dies.*

In that regard, the less advanced concept of time in physics, which still hangs on despite Feynman and Einstein is the idea of a dying entropic Universe.

This concept of ‘entropy’ as the only future arrow of time, or death arrow of expansive disorder, obtained in XIX c. studies of expansive gas, is completely outdated even by the standards of modern physics.

Unfortunately cosmologists have expanded that arrow to the entire universe, because they don’t understand Feynman, Einstein and their findings: that ‘time curves space into accelerated vortices of mass-information’ in galaxies, which balance the entropic arrow of expansive space between galaxies (hence both arrows as in E<=>Mc² , the fundamental equation of time in physics balance each other).

This, Einstein insisted as he obtained first that equation in its inverse form: M=E/c², in his paper ‘can energy create mass?’

And he added, ‘the separation between past, present and future is an illusion’. So did Feynman, with its deep insight on the 3 ‘time arrows’ of particle physics: present, reproductive waves of light-space and ‘bosons’, past arrows of entropic antiparticles and future arrows of informative particles that last much longer in time. So another fascinating, ‘immediate’ equation of 5D physics are the equations of life and death for all systems of the Universe such as:

*Life arrow:* Max. Time duration x Min. Space extension: Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp

*Death arrow:* Max. Space expansion (big-bang, dissolution of organisms into cells and atoms) x Min. Time (instant of death).

Yet again, the sum of both: Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp + Max. Sp x Min. Tƒ = 0-sum, which makes all scales and closed systems of the Universe eternal presents.

In physics this is the meaning of Feynman’s diagram:

Past-anti-particle x Future-particle = Present light wave, whereas particles last max. Time as they collapse space into minimal size and antiparticles last minimal time while they expand space annihilating particles in the moment of death.

As such Feynman’s work is more advanced that the outdated entropy theory and the so much praised Einstein’s revolution of space-time, who still missed, the ternary fractal, multiple Nature of times and the existence of its 3 time arrows. He simply ‘froze’ space-time in present slates to measure with differential equations (by definition infinitesimal moments) as Galileo did, every instant of an external time=change = physical motion.

Since physical systems are composite of the 3 arrows of time, its relative entropic big-bang past processes of death, its steady state, lineal constants of space-time actions and time clocks, and its relative future, evolving, temporal, informative cyclical accelerated 3^{rd} time age, when its time clocks, frequency, temperature or mass ‘collapses’ into the larger scale.

The best way to describe mathematical physics is therefore to connect its classic continuous space-time equations with those of the ternary fractal 5D space-time Universe. And to that aim we need to define the 3 fundamental elements of mathematical physics, fields, waves and particles as the 3 ternary elements of 5D fractal space-time through the…

Now this is how we formalize T.Œ, by advancing also the fundamental sciences – geometry, completing the work of Riemann, Einstein and others who study the 5th non-Euclidean postulate – the fact that points hosted multiple parallels, and improving over Aristotelian logic, because reality and the languages that express it are ternary langauges where relative past energies and future information merge into present existence in space:

Past-energy < Present-body/wave > Future-information

Or are sequential in time, past (youth) > mature age > Future 3^{rd} age of information.

On this Feynman had the insight in physics to give antiparticles a past arrow, as it is the case, and Einstein had some insight on it when it said that the separation between past, present and future was an illusion, and of course Leibniz, the genius, and the Eastern Taoists… did imagine the whole thing. Now we are truly formalizing this ternary logic proper of the Universal Grammar of all languages.

** **Now to streamline and make sense of physics beyond the how, obvious statements of its present discourse we must correct its concepts of space and time, from its astoundingly primitive conceptualization – the oldest of all sciences, and the most stubbornly preserved because as in earlier Ptolemaic models, it fairly works with all the complex epicycles needed to fit data.

So we shall without further ado correct lineal physics to match the perceived evidence of the fractal Universe, with the aim of making our linguistic mental mirror more apt to focus reality as it is, not a single space continuum and a single lineal, mechanical clock with a steady rate, but *a Universe made of infinite dynamic games of trans-formation between closed cyclical clocks of time and entropic motions of expansive *space:

Sp (∆-1:Field/∆:Gas/∆+1:Entropy, big-bang state) < ST (∆-1:Wave/∆:Liquid÷∆+1:steady state) > Tiƒ (∆-1:particle/∆-solid/∆+1:Clock, vortex state)

This is in the parlance of physics the Fractal Generator of its events and forms, in its 3 ∆-1 quantum, ∆-thermodynamic and ∆+1: gravitational main physical scales, which we must explain properly to start making sense of physical systems, its mathematical equations and forms and events. Let us then start by understanding its 3 arrows of space-time, correcting the 3 main errors of physics, regarding time which *is not lineal but cyclical, it is not a single entropic arrow but 3 arrows, and it is not the 4 ^{th} dimension of space.*

All in all the understanding of the ternary structure of all beings IS the essential element for the understanding of the constant beats of species between ‘motion’ and still form, space and time states, diachronic evolution and synchronous organic, spatial structure. It is to a certain extend the easiest part to understand. Yet the more difficult part because of its essential different nature, is the analysis of the fundamental novelty of the Fractal paradigm: the 5^{th} dimension and how dissentious planes of different size (cells/atoms; organisms, matter; cosmic systems/societies), interact together internally, thorough exchange energy and information and externally synchronize its existence.

How indeed you move your hand and your atoms in a different plane of existence move with you? What is the meaning of locomotion through 5D scales?

Of course all those are new questions that the shallow interpretation of a single space-time continuum does not require. Problem is reality is not according to sheer evidence a space-time continuum, so we cannot just as physicists do shun off all the questions that our shallow representation of reality does not fit in.

Let us then deal with the ultimate ‘metaphysical question’ about physics – the meaning and origin of motion.

Reality is eternal, in a constant process of reproduction of form, as motion , as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

A quanta of present time, is the relative duration of a closed, conservative timespace cycle.

Such as the product of the time duration and the spatial quanta content of that present time, becomes a measure of the ‘energy’ value of the entity per unit of existence.

The value of a time quanta, or ST parameter therefore becomes essential to calculate he power of a system, such as Max. ST will be a better system in any plane of existence we study.

What happens then at the end of the relative ST, whereas T becomes a quantifier of present time and s a quanta of space, when the time cycle closes?

According to the principles of transformation of energy into information, energy never dies but transforms itself back and forth into information.

This means that when a cycle of energy closes into itself, it repeats itself, creating a wave of relative present time, in which energy becomes reproduced.

The Universe does constantly reproduces present forms, formal motions of energy with different ‘existential force’ or ‘total momentum’ that never stops.

If the cycle closes into itself an inertial act of reproduction has taken place and the system conserves its energy, but if the cycle interacts with the environment, part of its present-time is worn out and the system looses motion and increases its form, displacing slowly towards the future.

This concept of energy as a repetition of closed cycles, which when not fully reproduced are partially spent do apply to all systems of nature, including the processes of aging of biological systems. And so it requires to deal with a second fundamental theme: the translation of motions of mathematical physics to T.Œ. intimately related to the energy of the system.

Now of the many aspects of the 6th isomorphism, in physics we deal mainly with the ternary symmetries due to the different place in the scales of parts and wholes that the 3 ‘elements of space’, ∆-1-limbs/fields, ∆-waves bodies and ∆+1-particles/heads play on the system, and between the system and the external world.

*And how the dominance of the informative systems in all scales of physics do determine a world cycle that will increase the density of information of the system as in living beings till it collapses the information of the system into a point-particle, dense crystal structure or black hole.
*

In the last graph, we see the intimate connection between the 3 ages of time, in the accelerated clocks of the Universe, in which each species walks steadily towards a spiral of maximal information and the 3 networks of its spatial systems, which follow a natural order towards higher form departing from simpler space, as *the dominant network is the mental informative network that consumes motion into still worlds, and so all physical systems follow the same 3 arrows of time of life systems. But what physicists do NOT realise is that this organic order of the 6 motions of time, also ends into entropic death, when they study the very fast smaller scales of the 5th dimension (particles). So they commit the error of thinking that particles are ‘immortal’, by confusing the particle-anti-particle states, which are life-death arrows.*

Antiparticles ‘die’ particles, and so both together at the point they form a ‘meson’, with no ‘spin’ (no life on it), physicists should understand they are seeing the moment of death of the particle, which then resurrects, starting a new life-death cycle. The same happens with waves, whose photons ‘die and explode’ into a wave and the implode and collapse back. And so it happens to galaxies in the quasar cycle.

In the graph the general structure of physical systems, in which a central point of view absorbs maximal information transforming entropy into form (mass, charge, solid states), while expelling the unwanted entropy, the graph applies to almost all physical systems from galaxies that expand entropically dark energy into intergalactic expansive space, to growth processes following fibonnaci series in crystals.

A few examples of the 3 ages-network dominance in different biological and physical systems. Galaxies therefore go as stars do through the same cyclical vortices:

It is generally speaking an isomorphism of hierarchical ‘social classes’, which considers in depth the asymmetric relationships established between relative past, simpler, micro-forms and larger, more complex formal wholes. Such as there will be always an arrow towards the dominant creation of future wholes, which defines the surviving part of a ‘lanwave’ or social structure:The graph compares both analysis that of space and its 3 relative forms, fields of entropy, waves of reproduction and informative particles, and its order in time, as the system becomes in an isomorphic world (as most physical systems, living in isomorphic vacuum) do, a spiral of growing density of information and diminishing mass, with the central black hole or densest atomic region in the centre slowly killing the motion of the being, through the 6 steps of birth-growth-reproduction-diminution(collapse of the wave into particle) and final extinction.

Yet physical systems, being simpler than biological one in information do have very slow processes of life and death, and they might remain in its most perfect simpler, iterative states (solid crystals) almost immortal. In any case the process is the same that all other systems: a central point of view or mind will create images of its whole (black holes have a 5D image of the galaxy, crystals the obvious images, and memorial traces of their growth in the structure of the crystal). A geometric proof of this structure happens in crystals as only those 7 crystal configurations in which there is a centred point of view, which maximises the perception of all the territory in the 3 dimensions of euclidean space exist. All other irregular crystals die away, do not exist, are not regular enough for the central point of view to focus an efficient image of reality that allows it to process information and guide the reproduction of new crystal cells, and the same happens with smaller atomic systems (ions), self-centred in the strongest atomic point of view:

**THE MOTIONS OF TIME in different scales. Particles, waves and fields.**

Those examples of the world cycles of physical species, ruled by the same informative overall arrow that orders its 6 motions displayed through small momentums into a complete whole world cycle of life and death shows that it is NOT the physical species, which is qualitative different but the way humans extract information from SUPERORGANISMS.

The process of seed generation, and growth is the common game that makes emerge through the 4^{th} postulate of ¬æ networks as a whole super organism, with a Tiƒ, central point of view and an atomic/cellular ST body-wave of organic parts, which preys on an entropic field of indistinguishable from the mass of individuals that loose its individuality and become exchangeable, as the system handles information with general fields.

This structure implies a social class structure in which the limbs/fields of entropy loose the game and end up being curved into form and mass, evolving increasing its information, easily masterminded by the central point of view of the system.

The same happens as we shall observe in evolution when the Earth handles its species with massive fields of energy (changes of glaciation temperatures) that determine the accelerate evolution of its species. And the question remaining in social sciences is if humans and its cycles of life and death of civilisation and growth of technology is part of a larger memorial plan of evolution of the planet, which seems to have a centre connected through flows of magma to specific regions of the Earth to perform its cycles of volcano activity and continental breaking that sets up the rhythms of evolution.

So T.Œ can explain the world cycle of physical species beyond the simplest locomotion description with the 6 Aristotelian motions of time (which we adapt to the world cycle of existence in the jargon of ¬Æ and plug them all within the general game of existence and evolution from parts into wholes (5^{th} more complex set of reproductive and social actions, ∑œ=û+1) and final big-bang dissolution in a quanta of time as an antiparticle, quasar or hypothetical big-bang Universe.

And once we do understand the 6th isomorphism of the Universe we can plug into it all the physical systems of reality and enter into the details of the thoughts of god.

Among them the main perception of classic physical equations are in terms of:

– The entropic field of physical systems which *are imploded into information, *as polar forces, enclose the field in its ‘surrounding net’ of attractive power (classic newton and coulomb, F=U.C. (Å.Magnitude x Å.M./d²), giving birth to the commonest flow of time of the Universe: Sp>Tiƒ, which can be seen as an attractive force between those 2 poles or as a motion of a particle that implodes entropic fields ahead and explodes them behind.

The wave process of reproduction of information, which is more stable: Sp<ST(ExI)>Tƒ and its ternary analysis. So to complete the main ways of studying physical systems, we must add studies in which we consider the duality of information processing, either as Sp>Tƒ or ExI>Tƒ ‘true physical system of wave-particles, body-heads’, which are the essential vital element of physical Universes.

**ExI>Tƒ ternary analysis**

Now, the complementary principle of body-heads, waves-particles, imply that there is an extraordinary symbiosis between light-photon waves-particles, electron-nucleon, liquid-crystals, uds-star herds/cbt-black holes systems, as there is a complete synergy and synchronicity between heads and bodies in biological systems or the neuronal people-castes in control of the languages of social information (politicians with laws, bankers with digital money) and the working, reproductive classes in social system.

So one of the fundamental fields of any T.œ scale is the study together of the present-future, ExI ≥ Tƒ complementary system alone. There are in that sense many perspectives of the system, the most obvious one is to consider its different states and configurations according to the actions its develops.

Of which there are 3 fundamental states, if we group the actions in ±∆energy (motion-feeding), ±∆ïnformation (perception-communication) and ∑œ>û (social reproductive events).

This is the bulk of analysis in any science. How the systems of body-head, waves-particles go about their ‘business’ of survival space-time actions, moving, feeding, perceiving, communicating, reproducing and evolving socially into larger systems. And for physical systems is not different, albeit a much larger field as physical systems study so many ranges of ∆-planes and have overdeveloped so much in our mechanist society where social and biological sciences (though now experiencing a huge development in the specific field of informative flows, mainly between ∆-1:∑œ>û:∆o scales or genetics), and the irrelevant field of using the robotic life species of the eco(nomic)system to observe the soon to be extinct life species of the ecosystem they also murder through its economic superorganism.

Again sorry for the ‘deviations’ of my T.Œ mind as it constantly establishes parallelisms between systems. To the point. We do have for each scale an ‘organism, in which the energy is absorbed from the ‘lower field of entropy’ Spe invisible to the system as a mass of indistinguishable particles, absorbed to move the system and perform the previous actions, the core field of physical system analysis. And those analysis are of many types according to the action we study.

The classic Fermion < Boson-wave>Fermion equation of particle physics responds to the ∆±I, ∆±e actions of two particles which will exchange energy and information and according to the type of exchange, gauge information, and attract each other, as they will ‘warp into form’ the distance between them, in a dual parallel action: -∆e-=+∆ï so the wave between them will grow in frequency-form and the distance will diminish. And this can also be studied from the perspective of the boson wave, which will collapse into particle of information absorbed by the receiving system.

And the system most likely will reach a dynamic equilibrium, or if not it will merge, into a social event, ∑œ>û, which can be according to the third postulate of ¬æ, a Darwinian event, in which the larger system with more ExI existential force measured as total momentum or total energy of the system, swallows and transforms the smaller system into a part of itself; socially if they belong to two ‘different’ species or scales with different 5D metrics (as in biology between animals and plants, or predators more efficient in their use of energy and information than herbivores). And the rule here is the same, the species with more existential force (maximal momentum), whereas the Tƒ-component (speed of time) dominates the Spe (component), as animals dominate slower planets, will become the predator element.

So when a black hole of maximal momentum (faster time clock and Tƒ/Spe density of mass) collides with a star it transforms after devouring and killing the star part of its matter into itself, and might even leave an offspring of smaller black holes as it keeps cruising as ‘a gravitational animal in control’ of the forces-fields of gravitation the galaxy for new ‘victims’. And a planet will slowly but steadily in a very long process fall down into the star that will devour it, or if in the eccentrically further orbits, steal some orbital momentum from the star and break loose. So will the electron falling and collapsing into a reverse beta decay event, into the nucleus, converting a proton into a neutron, or vice versa, escape from the outer orbits not freedom evolving from its wave state into a particle form.

Thus there is a lot of didn’t events to study on this specific realm of relationships between particles but them all follow the general laws of the ¬æ 3^{rd} postulate which defines according to the relative similarity of particles the nature of an event as ‘symbiotic’ social, evolving event when the systems are very similar or very complementary, forming then parallel social structures in which the identity of the individual still exists but a whole starts to emerge, or will form, unbalanced ionic states of null further growth in which individuals still hold their relative nature but one dominates clearly over the other (atomic orbital configurations), or will form Darwinian events in which the smaller, lesser ExI form is devoured and absorbed by the larger form, which will take part of it to renew its internal structures and waste their spacetime as energy, of the two type of fields of which the system is made (neutron and photon emission in beta decay events).

Now within those schemes, we might access after an ∆o: perceptive, gauging event (1^{st} postulate rules)->∆ï: communicative event (2^{nd} postulate rules)-≥Symmetry breaking event (Darwinian split) or Coordinated complementary event (3^{rd} postulate rules)> 4^{th} social networks growth, or 5^{th} Absorption of one point by the other as a flow of multiple parallels of energy and information.

This is then the BASIC TŒ language that merges Non-AE evolved mathematical formalisms, and Physical events, into a completely new way to understand mathematical physics which explains the same events within the conceptual frame of T.Œ and the laws of ¬æ that explain all other systems of the Universe.

Indeed, in all formal T.œ sciences we depart form the evolved logic, mathematical formalism and the Generator equation to define a series of general events that applied to each science will be able nicely to fit all the events of the science, within this jargon and its isomorphisms.

But that, which will be the task of the 3^{rd} and 4^{th} line will be too much of a future ideal world of Tƒ scientist nowhere to be seen in this planet.

It will sound as if I were coming from mars (perhaps : ) and since physicists are all spineless bastards to paraphrase Zwicky (that is spin 0 rounded particles, which are bastards and look like bastards from any way you look at them), and won’t admit any other jargon than theirs, what we will do in those posts on Physics is to go the middle wave, and mix jargons and explain facts of physics – not all as it would mean to rewrite my McGill encyclopedia of physics into T.Œ 0 in this manner So we shall just give you a taste of the whole nouvelle cuisine, or rather molecular cooking (being myself a Catalan, like Mr. Adrian) that will r=evolve science into the III millennia, if physicists do not eliminate us with their mechanisms, robots and weapons before, they become enlightened, which is unlikely.

All this said, the game of T.Œ simplifies enormously the language of physics through the simplification of its modern Hilbert-like Mathematical spaces. As all becomes reduced to the same 5 events across the 3 x 3 planes and scales of physical systems, by interaction of the 3 states of entropy-past, present-waves and future-particles of the different scales of physics, which perform either antisymmetric conception-3 ages-extinction events, asymmetric events that related the 3 parts of the system or 5D social evolutions.

But we do need to straighten up many conceptual dualities and ternary symmetries of physics to encase them within those Generator Equations.

For example some easy translations are:

The classic interaction of a weak field of magnetism with the electrons of an electric current or an atomic field on the other hand will correspond to an ∑œ>û, social evolution as the larger ‘magnetic Tƒ loop’ organizes as an external cyclical membrane a series of relative parts, electrons or atoms to create a larger whole.

The classic action-reaction processes of Newtonian Dynamics will respond to exchanges of ‘momentum, m(t)xV(s)’, between two relative Tƒ, and so can be written also as a Tƒ<±Force>Tƒ event in space-time in which a dynamic equilibrium is reached.

When studying physics in space thus we shall study the relative Spe fields of past spatial entropy, and Tƒ point-particles of future existential information, which converge into present, balanced Spe x Tƒ, systems of efficient spatial energy and temporal information that peg together the 3 elements, the past-field, the present-wave and the future-particle (or the entropic gaseous, liquid, balanced and informative crystal-solid states; or the Top-field/Strange Halo/ and Light Space on the cosmic largest plane of reality that create the atomic material and galactic superorganisms of the Universe.

A game of future accelerated vortices of time, Tƒ, which store the information of the system and Spatial, entropic motions, Spe and its co-invariant metrics that relate in opposite fashion the dualities of cyclical, accelerated time clocks of the future, past, decelerating extensions of spatial entropy and its present merging into systems of ‘workable’ energy and ‘relevant information ‘that create the balanced systems of the Universe.

**The homologies between scales.**

The intelligent reader will then realize that the same description happen for smaller scales of reality, of which we will bring here the 3 more important, the scale of electric currents, the scale of thermodynamic fields and the scale of quantum fields, and merely enunciate its equations:

– In the ∆ electromagnetic plane of existence, the field-wave equations are the Maxwell equations, and the ‘Geodesic equation’ is the Lorentz equation (whereas we consider the electron social group as the fundamental element of study):

Now, here we can see those Maxwell and Lorentz equations with a fascinating parallelism, which will give you a better sense of the whole and unity of physics. They are the expression of Maxwell equations for the wave-field of electromagnetism (above) and the equivalent equations of Einstein written by Heaviside, called Gravitomagnetic equations with its translation of jargon from gravity to electromagnetism. They ARE the same equations differing basically in the ‘constant’ of curvature of space-time, G and Q, which belong to two planes of size of the Universe, the cosmic and microcosmic planes.

We will very soon unify mathematically the values of Q and G in this post – a prime of 5D physics, proving therefore that ultimately 5D physics IS the proper model and only form to unify conceptually and mathematically the scales of the Universe. Now the scales are not exactly equal as no fractal is equal in all scales: you are not like your cells, but the astounding parallelism shows that conceptually the Universe IS a fractal of 5D planes. The only difference between those two constants will BE one of strength, due to the fact that according to 5D metrics, paradoxically smaller sales ARE stronger, faster in its time clocks: Spe x Tƒ = L. Below we see also the geodesics of both fields – the motion of particles on it.

The forest thus is clear; the details have been there for a century.

– In the ∆ thermodynamic equations of molecular atoms (where we consider the atom as the fundamental field of study), the Field-wave equation is the Heat equation (Gibbs equation of Free energy: G=H-ST, once more with 3 components) or equation of present, and the Geodesic equation of motion of a particle are Boltzmann equations for ideal gases, of the motion of individual particles, which gave birth to the understanding of the laws of thermodynamics.

– In the ∆-2 scale of quantum physics the Dirac equation becomes the present-wave equation (and the Schrodinger simpler version) which are in essence Hamiltonians of energy, that describe all its elements, and the geodesic equation are the Feynman formalism of motions and diagrams that express how particles move along paths exchanging energy and information with other particles.

And again for any physicist who wants to think on 5D terms, it should be evident that the thermodynamic and quantum scale use the same mathematical formalisms, statistical probabilities, to account for the massive amounts of particles with multiple degrees of freedom, and ‘canonical ensembles’, that study their motions in group, and aleatory paths in which particles stop and go, collide, exchange energy and keep moving and stopping (Brownian paths, Feynman paths), since we are describing basically two scales of motions which are telling us similar stories, a series of particles or molecules which are free to move around and perform actions of storage of energy and information, regulated by simple terms. So we can conclude this description of it with the understanding of the 4 quantum numbers that particles obey in terms of the actions of space-time they display to ‘exist’:

In the graph, the ∆-principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the l-number codes its form and informative gauging, ∆ï, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).

The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze masses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (mass-media) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.

In the graph, the ∆-principal number codes the ∆æ, ∆e, energy level and motion of the particle, the l-number codes its form and informative gauging, ∆i, the spin number with its chirality that codes the iterative, ∆œ actions, and the magnetic number for its ∆û, social ordered structure (organization of multiple orbitals).

The enormous complexity of studying those actions for assemblies of millions of particles can be compared to the attempts to analyze masses of human beings in their actions of consumption. Again economics and marketing of corporations do treat humans are indistinguishable computers and simultaneous networks of information (mass-media) manufacture our consent as herds, so there is NOT difference the way we do relate to humans when we adopt the perspective from above, of corporations and political polling with the perspective of quantum physicists or thermodynamics.

**Ceteris paribus analysis of 2 elements of the 5St symmetries**

Now it is essential to keep always in mind and study complex associated symmetries of the type 5s, 5T, ST, 5ST, that is analysis which consider the relationship of space elements with the 5^{th} dimension, time ages, space-time together in a single plane and the 3 elements together. Thus after understanding each element separated, we need to study the associated to each other element and then only then we can fully understand the whole relationship. So let us consider some basic rules of those relationships:

– 5S, if we consider the relationship of the Se, ST, and Tƒ elements with the 3 dimensions of space:

∆-1 Se-fields/gas will be observed as quanta of the ∆-1 scale and as such they will be in that state dissociated susceptible to be study with statistical methods as indistinguishable parts, NOT because they do not have individuality but because form a larger point of view.

∆-waves/liquids. Waves and liquids are transitional present states, in which the information is provided by a particle to the ∆-1 field which however does NO evolve into the particle but imitates its vibrational, external action, transferring through its herd. And so we differentiate in a wave the group speed and the phase speed, which is in fact an action at distance that constantly grows with the perimeter of the front of the wave. All waves in that sense will have a faster ‘longitudinal wave’ or phase wave, or front wave and the group wave, which is the sum of reinforced frequencies, that requires multiple vibrations up and down the particle or rotations left right of its angular momentum. But in general the equation of the wave will be:

Se-1:Provides the Energy of the wave –its micro point < ST: wave provides energy (group reinforcement) and form (phase)>Tƒ (provides information.

Waves are thus Se-1 points in a process of evolution, when the reinforcement group starts to create a ‘higher frequency-form’ in the wave, which could finally collapse into particle state.

It is also interesting to realize that the Universe is communicative, and often it is a 3^{rd} observer who really starts a process, of which the ‘actors’, might believe to be protagonists but are from the other point of view mere translators or boundaries activated by the 3^{rd} player. Indeed, a phase wave is produced by the larger particle, Tƒ+1, but as it expands its diameter, and accelerates its perpendicular speed, it might put in synchronicity two far away micro particles , which will seem from their perspective to be sending each other the perpendicular message of the front wave, but in fact they are spectators of the larger entity. Now from the larger entity, the perpendicular phase wave does not carry energy only is an information message, which travels at –c speed, but for the smaller micro points activated simultaneously the larger wave DOES HAVE ACTION AT DISTANCE, and because it DOES move and makes vibrate œ-1 points it does carry energy (more than information).

So when we apply this fact to us, as micro points of galaxies, in which black holes produce c-speed gravitational waves of gigantic wave lengths we will find a mechanism that without breaking the relativity principle, due to the 5D dimensional structure of the Universe and the different elliptic and hyperbolic perception from a relative œ-1 and ∆+1 point of view, will explain the ‘action at distance’ or infinite relative speed of gravitational waves, OUTSIDE galaxies, where its wave front perimeter, with an instantaneous speed larger than > π x r(galaxy radius).

How fast this speed can be? An easy calculus that an astrophysicist can of course refine with all his specialist knowledge comes as follows. Let us consider that gravitational waves from the black hole do extend with energy and form at least at the limit of extension of the galaxy (or else it won’t order the stars into its spiral branches). Let us consider that perception is at least the standard radian, which is often the mean perception of any eye-Tƒ system of the Universe. Does the Milky way which has a 100.000 light years diameter (some giant galaxies have 3 million light years radius), will certainly, produce 50.000 light years simultaneous waves as a radian, in a quanta of time; that is the time in which a black hole vibrates to produce those waves. This is an enormous speed and the true meaning of action at distance- the phase velocity of a gravitational wave.

The group wave, which will be transversal wave, though will have a slower speed, which in normal waves is recognized by dividing the Young modulus and the tension of the wave.

Now Maxwell did find his transversal waves considering those classic equations of waves √tension/density and while relativity ‘idealist, German interpretations’ of measure in the trendy age of Germanic idealism that brought us also the idealism of Hilbert in mathematics (axiomatic method in which he ‘imagines’ the existence of points and lines, lol; and Copenhagen interpretation where the ‘observer’ limits became the observable properties), it is about time despite so many ‘believers’, who ‘are so vain, that will always think the sun turns around them’, to accept the obvious: light waves are not different from any other waves, despite the fact we do not perceive the gravitational space-time on which they move, as mathematical points with parts are as real as the star, head, (maybe not that of Mr. Hilbert:) they describe and quantum observables are both particles and waves as all species, are distinguishable if we were as small as they are, are points with parts if we could see them closer. Here we are real.

Relativity waves were as Maxwell understood born of two function, tension and density, but because the universe is made of formal motions, what we call tension is motion and what we call density is form. And so the true equation of the speed of a universal wave which applies to waves of thought, social waves, biological waves(radiations) and the astoundingly beautiful generalization of waves in all the scales of reality is in a way ‘purely spiritual’, based in the fact that all is motion and form, so, the speedo f the wave is very simple:

V= S/T, for lineal motions, but being space bidimensional, a wave speed is the bidimensional motion of space, relative to the bidimensional motion of information

V^{2}= S/T=Se/Tƒ= bidimensional speed/Density of form. V^{2 = ‘}Elasticity=Â/Tƒ=Form density V=√ Â/r.

Which is the general Laplace equation for all waves, where we must define the specific motion-distance-elasticity of the medium and density of form, which for an electromagnetic wave as Maxwell deduced is given by the permittivity and permeability of gravitational space-time, the invisible ‘scale’ of the 5^{th} dimension on which light Planckton feeds and moves.

We can in that sense consider the that group wave of a gravitational wave is c-speed and it carries energy but the phase wave is the action at distance, and it is far weaker, which is another way to explain the hierarchy problem, latter analyzed with the equation of unification of charges and masses.

Those considerations can also be applied to the mechanical waves (thermodynamic waves) transferred in solids (earthquake waves), liquids (heat waves) and gases (sound waves), of the thermodynamic scale> here we observe the inversion so often found between scales: solid waves transfer maximal energy, heat waves in liquids are balanced and sound waves in gases transfer maximal information.

Now there are many ways in 5D metric to arrive to all those conclusions. In several parts we have obtained the action at distance speed very simply: V=s/Tƒ=S/o (information perceived in gravitational invisible waves) = ∞.

That is, a relative infinite for humans that perceives the phase wave as simultaneous.

But now we can make a dimensional analysis, whereas V2=Elasticity/Density (Laplace equation), which in dimensional terms writes as

V^{2}=ML^{-1}T^{-2 (}elastic dimensions)/ML^{-3} (density dimensions) from where we obtain L^{2}/T^{2}

Thus the wave speed is actually merely a bidimensional speed that transforms lineal physics into bidimensional physics and as such a fundamental equation of 5D physics, as we defined time and space as bidimensional ‘information’ and energy.

If we add for a specific medium a certain mass parameter and length for a 3 dimensional medium we obtain the elastic and density dimensions. But here the ‘substance’ matters not, as Mass is erased.

This is obviously telling us that the active magnitude Tƒ+1, which is mass (charge in the lower scale of electromagnetic waves) is not relevant because waves do not travel through the i+1 scale, but through the lower scale, in which we perceive space and time frequencies. Waves are thus with this simple analysis bidimensional space/time relationships.

But further on we can obtain instead of the infinity of ‘relative perception’ the relationship most often bound in speeds, ±10-11 growth of speed between scales or 100-121 growth of speed in 3 dimensional relationships (electron-light relationship given by the fine structure constant, which varies obviously according to the variation of energy, being 137 its lowest energy value, but this we will treat briefly on quantum physics as it is for 4 line advanced studies). What maters here is to realize that

V^{2} =S^{2} for each T^{2 }quanta of acceleration, in a decametric space universe, where the fundamental unit of space is 1-10 tetraktys structures means, that S grows from 10 to 100, 10 times more. And since speed is the perception of space as motion (Galilean Paradox), when we grow in scale a new dimension will imply 10 times faster speeds in bidimensional space/time

But if we measure from a lineal observer point of view, instead of T2 we measure t, and since now there are 100 T, time frequency in lineal time has increased also by 10, so we will observe a 100 increase in speed. Those are the parameters to consider when studying speeds in intergalactic speeds (10 C) and when considering the lineal measure of speeds in electronic speed (±1/100 c speed).

Finally the third type of waves in the scale of….

Tƒ notice finally that waves are ruled by superposition laws, of sum, as they are ultimately vibrations of the micro-states of the field, œ-1, which are in 5D metric much faster, able to accumulate much more information and hence easily handling the limited information provide by the larger, Œ-vibrator particle.

This means the wave can within its much faster speed of vibration accumulate and superpose many different vibrations, each one in a quanta of its much faster time, coming from the larger being. The saturation of those superposition waves is where ‘wave collapse’ starts, and a new ‘envelope’ integral starts to evolve the group of n-1 micrŒ-Points into a synchronic particle. Synchronicity is efficiency, and so saturated waves synchronize by superimposition, in one of the most fascinating mathematical ‘intelligent’ equations of the Universe (Fourier analysis/modulus).

**The Lagrangian and Hamiltonian: the worldcycle of physical beings.**

For all what has been said, and the definitions of present waves, v= Se x Tƒ, particles, Max. Tƒ/Se and fields, Max. Se/Tƒ, we are coming to understand 3 fundamental definitions of T.Œ for all sciences: the 3 ages of time in terms of the Se and Tƒ parameters:

Max. Se/Tƒ = Young energetic state (∂L=0; +∂’L); Max. Tƒ/Se= Old, future state (∂L=0; -∂’L); Max. Se x Tƒ (Se=Tƒ): (∂L=0; +∂’L=0).

Those 3 points which in the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian expression of ALL equations of physics represent the 3 stationary points of value 0 in the Lagrangian and maximal and minimal or 0 values in the Hamiltonian are the 3 points in which any System of Nature varies along its worldcycle. In physical systems however, the back and forth motion along those 3 points can clear a 0-sum time-loop that repeats itself constantly without the apparent need, at least from the human perspective of 2 Lorentzian regions in which the system breaks down:

In the graph we can see the interpretations of those 3 points, the Field in ∆-1, of Max. Se x Min. Tƒ, the wave of present, of Spe=Tƒ and the particle of future of Max. Tƒ x Min. Spe, with the present wave in the center. I call this graph the Lorentzian-Newtonian-Kelvinian (ab. LNK) graph as it represents in our Universe the 3 natural limits of existence of forms in the 4D present pace-time described by special relativity, the region of max. entropy when particles accelerate towards c-speed dying away, the region of present balance, or liquid/wave states an the regions of maximal information closer to Tƒ perfect vortex super fluidity and 0 degrees.

The 3 regions thus establish also a clear difference in the regions in which information grows, towards a higher ‘plane of existence’, in which the particle reaches its maximal form (collapse of waves into particles, when coming closer to the ∆+1 œ, such as when photons collide with electrons or electrons collide with atoms or atoms with molecules and so on.

The graph thus explains many elements of physics. It is ultimately a graph that represents and explains the power of the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian formalism that localizes those 3 ‘canonical solutions’ to physical systems and planes of existence, where the field quanta, the wave state and the Entropy element appear. Now in physical terms the wave will be defined by a wave equation:

Present = Se x Tƒ = S/T=V in lineal time notation or wavelength x frequency = Speed

The particle will be on the other hand defined by the density of information, Tƒ/Se = K, which is a fundamental parameter in all scales of reality; and we shall observe immediately that relates to the constants of curvature, G and Q in the equations of force : G, Q ( e x e or m x m /d^{2})

And the field will be defined by the density of energy Se/Tƒ = K, Se x Tƒ = K , E x T = K, which are the constant of actions of the two main fields of quantum physics (H=E x T) and Thermodynamics K = E x T.

Thus we resolve here the meaning of those Universal constants, beyond the ‘Germanic, idealist’ definition.

** BIOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL MOTIONS**

**Enlarging the reductionist concept of physical time≈locomotion. Worldlines vs. world cycles.**

It is important in that sense, given the enormous prestige and power that ‘physicists’ have, in a world which worships the machines and weapons they manufacture, to realise that their concept of ‘times≈changes≈motions’, called locomotion, is NOT AS THEIR SIMPLEX, reductionist models of the Universe seem to imply the ONLY * type of time≈change in the Universe worth to study; as if it were all the types of times≈changes of reality.*

There are in fact 7 forms of time≈change of which locomotion IS ONLY ONE, defined and studied exhaustively by physicists, with a simple formula, v=s/t, (Galilean relativity), latter refined by Einstein, which added a – ct parameter to provide for the ‘drag’ of the lower gravitational scale of space-time, when a larger, ∆+1 light space-time ray ‘feeds’ and ‘transforms’ gravitomagnetic energy into electric motion, warping and hence ‘diminishing by -ct’ (the warping), its motion.

All this is very interesting stuff for those who study the ∆±4 physical scales (taking the human self-centred scale as ∆0) ONLY, as they are dominant in the time=change of locomotion. But physicists ignore all about the other types of motion already defined by Aristotle, who talked of 8 motions≈changes: generation, growth, evolution, locomotion, diminution and extinction; to which he added ‘informative, still perception’ by a mind-God, focus of all the energy around it (which we shall also consider a form of motion).

In the organic paradigm the 8 motions of reality are all together studied with similar laws.

And so *what physicists call time is merely the time=change of locomotion* or translation in space, where obviously the parameter of time, t, measures only the speed and translation in space of a given entity – one of the 7 motions of the being: v=s/t, t=s/v. So time=change becomes ONLY for that specific study of locomotion, the 4th parameter-dimension of motion.

What has become a ridiculous ego-trip of dogmatic physicists obsessed by their worldly profession (in as much as they make all the weapons and machines of motion of our world) is to *think that locomotion is all what there is about time.*

So physicists of locomotion have created an entire philosophy of science and time=change BY REDUCING ALL the forms of change TO simplex LOCOMOTION…

As if all other motions were NOT important motions and HAD nothing to do with time.

Now I am fully aware that the ‘religion of technology’, is so strong that most people believe that Physicists, as fathers of the machine, must also have a special understanding of the meaning of it all’ – a concept perfectly assumed by our concepts of knowledge, modelled on the Universe and man as a mechanism. So most readers will simply abandon this web if we affirm simply that Mr. Einstein’s work is a minor footnote in time theory – but *it is really a very limited view of the entire Universe of time cycles and motions, which will never be able to harmonise and explain all other phenomena happening in time, such as evolution, **history, technological advances and the overall arrow of increasing information – the arrow of life and eusocial evolution that dominates the Universe.*

Indeed, what you ‘are’ will never be explained by physicists’ ultimate concept of time as a mere series of locomotions, which Einstein and Minkowski finally defined as a ‘worldline’ according to which your life in time is just the sum of your locomotions in space-time from birth to extinction. In other words, because they study physical locomotions, they reduce life to a world of locomotions and change=time, to changes in your position in space.

So indeed, we owe awe to physicists for its exhaustive analysis of locomotion, the ‘theme’ of science most profoundly studied by those who make of the machine and its energetic locomotions the meaning of all realities.

But we need a healthy dose of skepticism, when what was rightly defined in the XIX century, as the science of motion – not the science of ‘everything’ pretends to expand its limited ‘notions’ (n here for a change:) of motions to all phenomena of reality.

All other forms of motion DO happen also in time but those other kind of time=changes, *which require the understanding of 5D metric equations CANNOT* be studied in A SINGLE PLANE OF CONTINUOUS SPACE, in which locomotion happens. In that sense, physicists’ time will be a mere 1/7th of the whole time=change philosophy of science studied here, and by the principle of correspondence, perfectly embedded within phenomena happening in a single space-time plane.

**Simplex wordlines vs. complex, organic worldcycles of time.**

WHEN WE SAY THAT TIME IS ALL AND WE ARE TIME-SPACE BEINGS, we say so because we shall expand and explain the 6 motions of time, and hence when we study all forms of time=change in the Universe, indeed, time will be all, as all phenomena of reality can be reduced to those 6 motions themselves varieties or ‘parts’ of a WORLDCYCLE of existence, no longer a physicists’ worldline (as now we have at least two arrows of future, energy and information so time must have at least 2 dimensions and hence it cannot be a line but a cycle).

So we can for example order those 6 motions as: generation->locomotion->growth->evolution->reproduction->diminution->extinction and we DO have the fundamental composite, sequential mode of time-change of a being, between birth and extinction, whose reasons of existence we shall fully unveil. So we will make a huge LEAP on the complexity of our analysis of time=change to encompass it all.

A task I believe the model of fractal space-time beings fully achieves, by considering the model of 4D continuous space-time, a simplified analysis of the whole range of scales of space-time beings, circumscribed to the simplest ‘forms’ of the two ‘limiting’ scales of our perception, hence the less ‘observed’ and easier to describe because of its limited information (the gravitational scale, of which we see only 4%, the rest being dark matter and energy, and the quantum scale, we perceive distorted in the case of the smaller light space-time scales, due to the uncertainty principle.)

So while as Eddington rightly affirmed physicists are plagued with idealist theories, it is quite remarkable that with those limits of experimental perception, they consider that only those partially ‘unknown’ scales are ‘important’ to understand the meaning of it all, and ‘only’ locomotions matter to that aim, as if the other 6 motions were ‘lesser’ ones or would not exist, *just because a single scale of space-time cannot be used to define them, but at least 3 ∆±1 are needed.*

This is really the problem of ‘physics’, not one of quality of its work on locomotion, but one of arrogance in its desire to explain it all and discharge as irrelevant what their models of single time, cannot explain. So alas, those other 6 ‘events’ are not time-like…

Yet evolution of in-form-ation, of biological form, is obviously a theory of time=change perfectly defined by biologists, which we shall expand introducing topological evolution and organic evolution of parts into whole.

So it is reproduction, generation and extinction, 3 inverse motions in the 5th dimension, as they are travels through 5D metric ±∆ (S x T) =K. where the being first reproduces and organises similar cells or atoms (in a much larger scale of time), which ’emerge’ into a larger ∆+1 whole, departing from those ∆-1 atomic or cellular parts, which finally extinction will dissolve back into the ∆-1 lower scale of the 5th dimension.

And the same happens with growth and diminution, also inverse motions, in a shorter volume of space and time.

Indeed, those 3+2 motions imply a growth of size in space, coupled according to 5D metric with a slow down in time of the vital rhythms of the seminal cell, when the seed of ∆-1 information becomes a larger ∆- foetus).

Finally in-form-ation is as the name suggests form-in-action.

So we have fast defined in GST terms the 7 motions of the Universe that generate the world cycle of ‘existence’ of any physical or biological being (don’t worry if you don’t get all my definitions and terms so fast – it will take some ‘time’ for you to familiarise with those metric, albeit far less than the exhaustive analysis of locomotions of physics, with far more depth in the understanding of why we ‘are here’ and the meaning of it all).

Such wider model, which includes by the Principle of correspondence the quantum and relativity description as those 2 limiting ‘boundary-scales’, is therefore the next enlarged understanding of philosophy of science, and a giant step in the purpose of knowledge – to fully grasp, objectively, without anthropomorphisms that distinguish man from all other beings, the meaning of the Universe, and *our position within it, as a part made to its image and likeness, like everything else.*

The more complex all-encompassing analysis of time motions and its sequential different orders in the Universe thus becomes an essential vastly enlarged new field of knowledge about time, which humans have always intuitively know – and Taoism developed in its pre-magic era, into some amazing ‘insights’ on the laws of time and the ternary structure of the fractal Universe (central drawing). On the right side we see the commonest time-clock of the Universe an accelerated vortex, which follows 5D metric equation: V (t) x R (s) = K, giving origin to the time-clocks of two fundamental physical scales, charges and masses, we shall easily unify with those metric. In the left, the simplest description of a world cycle of life and death sum of the sequential 6 motions of the Universe.

It follows then that the physical motions of biological and human systems are by the same token reproductions of form in smaller scales.

While the other motions, generation>evolution>GROWTH>locomotion>reproduction>decay>death, merely transcribe a world cycle of existence of any system of the Universe:

**SUMMARY**

- Ternary Constants.
- Non-Æ: 4th Isomorphism
- Constants of mathematical systems
- Constants physical systems
- Constants of biological systems
- Constants of social systems.

*****

The third line increases formal depth and experimental detail in our study of the 5 Dimotions of all systems of ∆@st, defined by 4 fundamental elements, it spatial @-minds, ∆-§cales, and 5 time dimotions.

Further on each sub-element of a species, can be *studied as a fractal by subdividing its analysis again in its 5 sub-dimotions and* 4 sub-elements.

So we describe:

@… the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’ and ‘its actions’ that

**$**… create S-patial, ‘bidimensional’, ‘ternary, constant’, ‘organic networks’ or ‘species’ …

**ð…** which live in T-ime, through ‘3±1 ages’ ‘traveling=moving’… through

**∆…** §scales’ and ‘planes’ of the fifth dimension of ‘Γœ∆’ the whole of wholes…

Each of those ternary sub-properties of the four elements of reality are then illustrated for:

- ASTROPHYSICAL SCIENCES
- BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES.

Leaving for the fourth line of maximal detail, an analysis in depth of the 9 scales of ‘stience’, from the smallest quantum forces, to the largest cosmos, showing that all what exists is ∆@st sharing the same properties of exist¡ence.

**I. ****VITAL, UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS**

Dimotions can be measured as STeps of Space-time, whose variety increases, from the initial 2 states, pure form (language of perception) and pure locomotion (motion without stopping as a particle-head, always in wave state):

S<T>S, and so on. Now those steps as ternary steps start to trace forms in the spacetime background or larger scale in which they can play at least 2 scales around in acts of entropy (Death and absorbtion of energy). When we see a superorganism thus it will have a vital energy encircled which is able to destroy at two levels below into entropy the regions around it, to extract the bits necessary for the steps of inner self-replication, ST=ST.

We shall call the following steps:

SS (AB. §): Mental, Solid Form

$<t: Locomotion

$<t>§: energy becoming information

t>§: Information; perception.

TT: Entropic motion.

As soon as we observe the previous equation an astounding discovery comes in, by virtue of the state of space-time in which each action is defined, there is only a possible form to connect them repetitive cylcles, $<t>§.

**Constants of Nature: vital ratios and dimotions of nested supœrganisms.**

Constants of Nature are mostly ratios that define specifically for each super organism of reality the main ‘dimotions’ of a system. As the Universe is a nested system of larger ∆±¡ super organisms, it follows that there will be different sets of constants of Nature for each of those ‘scalar super organisms’, starting by the constants of nature of the ∆±4 cosmos, which contrary to belief is NOT born in a big-bang, but an immortal self-reproductive fractal, of which we can’t perceive much outside the galactic super organism in which we exist. So the constants of the Universe are NOT known, beyond the galactic scale, and many of the so-called Universal constants, as usual with huminds are hyperbolic generalizations of constants that apply only the smaller next ‘scale’ super organism, the galatom (∆±3 planes).

So most Universal constants of Nature are ‘local, organic constants’ of the galaxy, notably c-speed (the v=s/t constant background space-time of the galaxy), and h-planck (the constant of information within the galaxy), which *do not apply to the outer galactic dark world, where h-planck is no longer a feature (Higgs scalar boson), c-speed is no longer a limit (10 C galactic jets, z>c redshifts) and 0 K is likely not the limit of order… *

It follows then that all constants of nature must be closely related to the specific 5Ð metric of the system studied, as it defines the time and space and space-time co-invariance of the system. And so when considering any super organism we shall start by defining its ‘co-invariant’ 5Ð metric constants, $, ð and $ x ð = K, and then break down its 3 variations in ¡±1 planes, and keep studying its dimotions, topological constants, etc. etc. to get the 11 parameters of its dimensional isomorphisms, which will allow us to ‘reconstruct’ its world cycle, similar to all other clone species, within the ‘variation’ allowed to those constants for the species studied.

**Present co-invariant constants.**

Of all those constants the most important are co-invariant ST ratios that define each dimotion of the system through a constant.

The actions of those Space=time Ðisomorphic beings turn around the concept of present, dynamic repetition that seems not to change. As such quantitatively appear as a game of vital and Universal constants, which are in fact constant ratios that have patterns of frequencies, populations and exchanges of energy and information that remain constant.

The fundamental vital constants of each species are its scalar social ratios (ab.∆§) in ‘absolute 5D time’, an its three dynamic ratios (s/t≈speed, t/s≈density, s x t≈momentum constants) in relative worldcycles of timespace.

We can then consider the ‘symmetries’ of those ratios in topological variable forms – simultaneous space or synchronous time (maximal points of the world cycle, or ageing constants).

And break the ∆§ constants constants of scale, either growth an emergence, or diminution an dissolution.

*Those are the 3±∆ basic constants to define a system of nature; the rest are details – reason why we call it the fourth isomorphism of nature.*

For *every step motion there is a stop state. States change in time, topologically ‘tearing’ its variety in space. Topological transformations in this manner become changes of states, and mathematically both are equivalent – as it is the ¡-1 0-1 sphere and the 1=in**finite plane.*

**The details.**

An external undetailed viewer who don’t see the time-passing back and forth feed-back motions and ratios of exchange, will seem ‘abstract, constant, balanced numbers’ on its mean Gaussian topping, most transited central point.

But the constancy of reality is REAL, because, and this will be the content of the next isomorphism, *ultimately all comes to a simple principle: reproduction≈conservation of information, forms-in-action, the immortal thoughts of ›Γœº∆, the Game of existence we all play.*

What are then the initial key constants that we can extract from the 5Ð metric of the system? S x T = K, Obviously the immediate 3 combinations of those parameters we call:

**Density/****Volume****: ð/$.**** Existential, Reproductive speed: $xð.**

We call the speed of a system in its dimotions of space-time its reproductive, existential force, and as such the concept of moving through the fifth dimension incorporates all the elements of classic science with the complexity of pentalogic.

The existential reproductive speed of a system encodes all others, and directly expresses the metric, but for existential speed we talk of any speed in any of the 5 dimotions, so how we averate the 5 dimotions? Shall we add them or multiply them, rest entropy, or equal entropy to all others? Those are themes studied in existential algebra, which studies the dimotions as worldcycles imprinted by species on its states of exist¡ence.

The 2 defining Universal constants express for each superorganism, its two main parameters of lineal space-time (motion), informative density (form) and its combination, which defines its existential force, or 5Ð metric equation, $ x ð. They are the obvious manipulation with the basic x / operandi of existential algebra, so obviously the theme of physical and vital constants cannot be understood with the undertanding of vital algebra, that is, the meaning of the operandi of mathematics in terms of dimotions. To state first that the most important dimotions are re=prodictive dimotions and that the ‘product’, as the name indicates is the operandi that studies reproductive events. So we shall start considering those – the immediate understanding then of the ± operandi as a social dimotion of adding or substracting to a herd clone elements comes; for the more complex ∫∂ ∆imotions, we refer to the 4th line.

How to adapt then the constants human sciences to the 3 parameters of ‘stience’, is quite easy, as we have conceptual and formal elements to discern among them.

We shall start by those of physics.

In physics locomotion is the fundamental Ðimotion. External locomotion is related translations in space, which can be derived of its speed, either expressed in terms of time-duration, s/t or its preferred inverse, $ x ð wavelength frequency, which for ‘inertial constant speeds’ is exactly the expression of 5D metric.

Then we can easily consider, with the parameter of information, obtained from the ð-cycles of the being (its frequency in hertzs being useful in humind physics), the ‘inverse’ dimotions of information, with the parameter of density, ð/$, which will give us a proper expression of its informative poweress.

SYSTEMS are knots of timespace cycles, repeated as actions with a frequency (we eat three times a day, sleep one, reproduce ad maximal every year, perceive every second) which determine the next level of organisation through complex synchronicity.

The result is a being as knot of space-time cycles, which are in fact actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information with the external world.

So what are the minimal elements for this ‘building up’ of existences? We found in the previous isomorphism that the minimal unit of reality is bidimensional, even if we do not perceive some of those dimensions (waves instead of lines, cycles instead of points and so on). And we defined two elements of bidimensional nature, space-entropy, and information-time; combined in four-dimensional momentum-energy beings.

And so we do need three *fundamental parameters in all sciences to **describe reality.*

For example, in physics all can be described with spatial length, time clocks and ∆-mass/charge parameters.

But we also stated clearly the principle of absolute relativity: in the scalar Universe the ‘stif’ mind-singularity that stops those tƒi cycles into a 0-motion mapping *is a relative perceiver of only 3 ∆±1 scales (which can be as extended in 5D as the physical scales of the galaxy, or as constrained as those of a pheromonal ant).*

So *ratios between limiting scales (of temperature in ∆º thermodynamic systems, of frequency in ∆-1 quantum systems, and so on); is what the universe is about. And three of those ratios are fundamental, in a Universe of essentially two elements (seen still or in motion): S/T or speed to measure space-distances, T/S or density to measure informative charge/masses and SxT or momentum/energy to measure present-time. *

It is then departing from those elements through combinations and interactions how we can build mathematical physics in quantitative terms and in other more complex sciences, not so easily described by numbers, we cane explain conceptually in qualitative terms the meaning of existence, its ‘actions’ and fractal structures, motions and forms.

**Constants as efficient standing points that maximise the three functions of beings.**

−Why in a Universe in perpetual motion, composed of time arrows we see the kønstancy of it all? The reasons of the existence of universal and vital constants (ab. kø) in all systems which make us feel the perennial immortality of form is dual:

In that sense, 3 are the fundamental constants used to define any system of the Universe, as perceived in a single scale of existence, related to the ratios of dynamic exchange between entropy an information within the being an its actions.

WE SHALL call them, S≈T motions.

Reality structures itself in parallel, through the underlying language of space and time, into functional ternary systems symbiotic to each other, which create dynamic interactions, which are feed-back partial equations of the generator that survive better by complementarity and functional symbiosis, so order prevails in time over disorder, when function and form become harmonious – and we sense it as beauty.

*Those are the proportional ratios and topological constants of the ternary symmetries of space-time: *

*S/T or speed of a system, s x T or power/force/momentum of the system and t/s or density of the system.*

Thus those are the 3 fundamental constant ratios of the being, which define its entropic, reproductive an informative capacity as a species.

**∆ºst symmetric sub-constants.**

However as all systems do have an ∆ºst±1 structure there are MIRROR SYMMETRIES OF THOSE CONSTANTS IN THE OTHER TERNARY ELEMENTS, giving birth to secondary constants related those three. So in a ‘future exhaustive analysis’ the researcher could also consider:

- ∆º: Linguistic constants which mirror them in the mind language. This are ‘more solid’, because the mind ‘S<tiƒƒ>S’ reality into a spatial fixed form, slowing the motions of time into pixels of spatial simultaneous, synchronous image, pegged magically through the ‘fractal networks’, paths of ‘meaning’, which guide entropy into forms in action, in-form-ation which becomes ordered and finally reached a ‘locked’ puzzle-like fitted form.
*Those are the syntactic constants of mind languages that see those constants as ‘solid informative names’ (density constants), action/forces (Sxt constants) and entropic objects destroyed and ab=used by names.* - Ωt: 3±∆: On the other hand, as all constants are really dynamical processes, ratios and exchanges of entropy and form, balanced in a conserved present, repetitive momentum, when in ‘perfect, efficient’ tune with the world they live in, but leaning towards the ‘destructive ends’ of entropy and ‘s<tiff’ stillness of the involute mind, sooner or latter the system will go out of balance, and as the mind dominates, it will save error or accident, predation or defective form, move ahead in three ages, S>st>t which implies also a series of time constant of ageing cycles, and ‘limits’ of existence, beyond which the system shall collapse. And those are the constants of time of each being in ‘existence’, within its variability domain: Max. E x t > e=t > Max. t x e.

**Decametric scales.**

The fourth constant though deserves a special treatment, as it is the ∆-scalar type of decametric growth of social dimensions: 3 x 3+0=S+1; ∆+1. In the graph the commonest topological form of a whole, a tetraktys, where the five, ‘black, informative ball’ of maximal communication with all other points is the mind-point (when in motion moving to the 1 position). The fact that humans in pool use 10 balls and put the ‘mind-location’ in black, the color of information, shows how ‘immanent is the game’.

So for all systems there should be constants of space, of size, of social growth and scales, as the system grows and evokes with other beings, logarithmic and integral constants, or disintegration ones, Tˆs and Sˆt. As systems come into social groups and evolve together, both during its internal 0-1 interval from finitesimal parts to wholes, mostly exponential – since this is the fortunate time for the being, when the placenta-mother gives him unlimited energy till the system emerges; and the 1 to ∞ social external constants, mostly decametric, the most efficient configuration, to fight out in the struggle for ‘∃xi≈st¡enœ as the system struggles in the larger world.

So we talk of three fundamental constants, *speed, density, existential momentum; and three set of constants related to the social scales of the system and its size in space, to its time ages, and to its mind mappings; which explains why we give the sixth number to the isomorphism of Universal constants.*

Now, in the physical details of the web we do mathematize and relate those concepts to the laws of physics and see how broad those conceptualizations are to explain all kind of laws in its whys, here we are more interested in the whole understanding of the ‘game’ of the Universe, which consists in mixing iterative Se and Tƒ cycles and ‘—motions’ in multiple dimensions across multiple space-times, creating balanced, constant quantities.

*And so in the 3rd post here, dedicated to constants, is where we shall truly ‘define’ the LAWS, that is the ‘combinations’ of Se and Tƒ that the Universe keeps steady and makes immortal, mostly those which are balanced, with equal Se x Tƒ quantities, as this ‘function of existence’, Se x Tƒ is maximized when Se =Tƒ (5×5>6×4>7×3; even if 5+5=7+3).*

This simple rule, that the Universe conserves combinations of ‘Spatial ‘Ðʼmotions’’ and “temporal Form’ which are balanced, is THE MAIN LAW OF THE WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE. And those species which in a certain ecosystem find those balances and maximize their existential force, survive better.

So in physics Momentum is conserved. Se x Tƒ=ST. And this can be seen in all kind of ‘physical planes’. Another matter is to analyze detail by detail the laws of physics that reflect that law.

Often those laws are of the form Se x Tƒ = Energy (potential and kinetic together) or = momentum.

For example, the fundamental law of electricity is J = σ Sp, this says that the density of a current, is proportional to the energy of the field.

Now here, ‘density’ is a quantity that measures q ∆ v. Whereas q is the charge, the vortex of the electric space-time field, the equivalent to the mass on the cosmic plane, the informative ‘clock of time’ of the quantum world, and ∆ its number of charges.

So q ∆ is the total quantity of clocks of time, Tƒ, of the current, v its is speed or |-Motion, so J actually measures the product of the Tƒ and Se of the electric world. It is *really the measure of the momentum of the electric world. Whereas Sp is the best expression as sum of all its kinetic and potential energies, of the space-time world in which the momentum happens, from where the momentum extracts all its space-time fractal parts. So really this writes as an expression of the existential equation:*

*$t x ƒð = ST. A fractal entity of space-time, of energy and form, is in balance, in proportionality with the space-time field in which it exists: *

*$t (v) x ðƒ (qn) ≈ Energy field. *

From this first equation of electricity physicists define ‘intensity’ (qnv x S) by multiplying density by the cross surface through which the current goes. And this is the magnitude they use for almost everything, measured in amperes which is the standard unit for electricity. Yet when we come to fundamental laws, they are related to J, the electric momentum. For example, the fundamental law of electronics, Richardson’s equation, relates J electric momentum to temperature.

And so we shall once and again find this big problem with physics, which is a practical science of measure and mechanical building. It is more convenient for electric construction to deal with intensity, but density is the ‘nature’s conserved’ principle. It is easier to deal with ‘lineal time duration’ to measure motions in space, without entering into the details of the steps of the legs, the cycles of the wheel of the car, or the frequency of the wave that moves, but the universal real magnitude is cyclical time.

it is easier to calculate and extract motion from beings to add up the kinetic and potential energy and put them all in the same ‘bag’, mass, as a form of energy, position as a form of energy. But that simplifies enormously our understanding of the duality of the Universe, between its two poles, in this case

Sp=Mc^{2}: Sp(Se): < c^{2}: ∆-constant > M (Tƒ)

That is, a vortex-clock of time called a mass, can be uncoiled into an explosive, entropic radiation of kinetic energy, Sp, and this will be done in a proportion, which is again a constant of the space-time field in which the process takes place, across a bidimensional space-time plane called ‘light’, c^{2}.

Now the explanation of what that equation means: the back and forth transformation of mass time clocks into entropic motion, measured in the light space-time plane filled with ‘bidimensional fields of lights-space, c^{2}, is ‘philosophy of science’ and ‘principles’, ‘thoughts of god’, and that is what this web is about. the details and the practical use of them, is what classic physics is about.

Both are not mutually exclusive. Personally i find more fascinating the thoughts. Most physicists as Feynman put it, don’t care about the whys, the thoughts, which is ‘the only question a physicist must not ask’. He did work on the atomic bomb. I have wasted my active life opposing to nuclear weapons. So did Einstein who cared for thoughts, and found the 4th dimension. But the truth is we live in a world of praxis, which obscure the thoughts, the forest. And that is bringing us to the end of Gaia’s existence.

*Because the thoughts are ultimately about existences.*

Today the numbers and praxis of measure and construction of machines is the only thought understood by physicists. And that is a problem.

So returning to ‘Ðimotions’, Se, is distance in stillness, and entropic motion, as Ðimotions’ is a measure of all the ways a molecule in a gas can increase its space because it is an expansive |-Motion.

When you see the word ‘energy’ printed as synonymous of space, I am using the concept of kinetic energy, or energy as a synonymous, but we shall try to be more rigorous and define always Se as what truly means: Spatial expansive, lineal distances/entropic motions).

**The ultimate mathematical principles.**

In that regard, while we have stressed the mirror function of mathematics, NOT a literalist or creationist method, as our mind is linguistic, obviously languages do matter. And mathematics as the most synoptic efficient language is the right choice for physicist, but its use must be ground in the higher truths of space-time properties – the reality- and its logic laws of epistemological truth – the method to refer the mirror to that reality, and connect them through experimental and logic veracity. Only then we can fully understand mathematical physics.

The mathematical mirror in that sense *is excellent because it embeds in its synoptic language the fundamental properties of fractal space (in a larger measure than those of cyclical time, for whose symmetries uses distorted mirrors of the ‘generator’ and a simpler Aristotelian logic of a single arrow of time). And both will become simpler, filled with more meanings and more powerful when we complete its ‘r=evolution’.*

Consider another simplex example: the relationship between Universal constants and *arrows and dimensions of time-space.*

## The fundamental functions and constants *correspond to those arrows, but there is no magic about it, but synoptical power and EFFICIENCY:*

- So pi is the constant of informative perception and trans-form-ation of motion into form: 3 |> O+ 4% apertures to the world; and as the inverse arrow of form into entropy is just the contrary function, also the inverse ‘unwinding of form into motion’. But then is most often a multiple of π, (as in k and G equations) or a ‘radian’ of π (as in
~~h)~~, because*the dense curvature merely ‘peels off’ in parallel a ‘thin membrane’ of its curvature or perceives a ‘radius angle’ of the external universe.* - Phi is the constant of reproduction also because the efficiency of its spatial distribution that packs the maximal number of ‘reproductive events’ from an initial generator in minimal space.

And so *two simple, related constants suffice for most simpler, geometrically perfect actions of the 3 arrows of time: motion to form, form to motion and **reproduction.*

What about the 4th and 5th dimensions? Again the answer is self-evident (if you understand the organic Universe):

As those dimensions are concerned with fractal discontinuous or differential continuous functions from wholes to infinitesimals, it *must maximise the growth, and so polynomials and logarithms are used. Specifically:*

- e is the number of the fourth dimension of decay and death, which is the fastest possible process of dissolution of a single whole into infinitesimals, as those ‘cells/atoms/citizens’ ARE already reproduced and must merely be liberated from the single whole-membrane. So we find it in all decay process because of a simple property: e IS the fastest growing exponential function of any two numbers, in the Universe (and many related properties). Interesting enough to notice that it was found NOT as decay but as ‘interest=usury money’, what says a lot of the astounding ‘grab-theft’ of the financial profession, which found the maximal parasitic growth on account of doing NOTHING; just lend useless gold.
- While inversely the Log¹º function is the scaling of social evolution because the ‘tetrarkys’ with 3 x 3 elements as networks of entropy, energy and information with the central whole-singularity mind emerging in the new scale as ‘1’, is the most perfect form to deal as a time§paœrganism with the survival exigencies of any ecosystem of ‘fractal points’.

So we shall study mathematics *as the most efficient, synoptic language of the properties of timespace beings, after the very essence of the game, the formal generator, its symmetries and ∆•st logic, for which obviously the pretentious guru-magic of mathematical physicsts and the like, is just a barren “latin’; *and simplify, explain and evolve its Non-a logic and ‘fractal units’ (non-e points) from ‘space-time reality’ into mathematical mirroring.

All this said mathematics is one of the best languages to mirror efficiently the Universe, specially in spatial dimensions, but *since all languages are inflationary it is a key element in mathematical analysis of ∆st systems to break down what is ‘experimental truth’ and what is fiction. Consider the case of ‘dimensional analysis’. As it happens there are only 3 bidimensional topologies which correspond to the 3 functions=forms of all systems. And there are *only manifolds of rank 3 or lower which are ‘smooth’, differentiable, meaning systems where ‘time’ moves smooth through ‘present derivatives’.

So in a single plane of present only ternary space and ternary time dimensions are possible. As the mathematical mirror gets distorted, outside those 3s = 3t, the mirror guide us – but the experience must confirm them. This was the essence of Lobachevksi’s thought when he found non-euclidean points now forgotten: that maths are inflationary in its diverse theories so we cannot just do as mechanon physicists do, to write an equation and expects to be there, but a more subtle approach of mirrors observing reality and ordering it in local regions is required.

Soon we will see the interaction languages-reality where reality dominates but the mirror can also deform reality to make it seem like the mirror. Space-time thus comes first, and its dimensions *are the origin of reality; as Mirror-languages are both more concise and specific, so they cannot show all its properties and they all have a distortion to reduce information I.e. euclidean points have no ‘breath-information’ inside and so on.*

As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe.

Let us then show how those constants appear to the three great disciplines of science as:

**I. PHYSICAL, UNIVERSAL CONSTANTS.**

**THE METRIC EQUATIONS OF THE GALATOM.**

*The existential force=momentum of galactic systems: hc*

When we study the strong nuclear force as an entropic death of particles that ‘extract’ from them its ‘existential force’ hc, we realize we have found the two key parameters of the ‘galatom’, the superorganism in which we exist.

This concept $=c; ð=h, gives us a product $ð, which is the fundamental constant of any system of nature; and as usual in the entangled universe, will have different forms of ‘measuring it’… conceptually and physically but we shall call generally the 5Ð metric of a system or in terms of its ‘value’, the *existential force or existential momentum of the system, its ‘power’ to survive. And so it is closely related to the vital Energy of the system, which other systems will absorb as in the case of the decay of pions in the strong force… as indeed happens in Einstein’s formulae: E=hc/λ*

Let us re-examine this formula, as it tells us a lot on the nature of physical light spacetime systems as we are, in the context of the fifth scalar dimension:

Paradoxically the minimal unit of the galatom, the ‘planckton’, defined by its existential force, hc, *has more energy the smaller λ, its wavelength is. The explanation though is immediate in 5D metric: as the larger wholes are ‘ghosts’ rising from the lower scales, obviously they must have a lesser quantity of energy, because they are ultimately parasites of its parts. So the inner Russian dolls of reality concentrate more ‘energy and information’ to supply the potential ghost-wholes that will enclose them.*

So we talk of a ‘nested Universe’, in which the space and time, form and motion, relative h and c parameters that define the existential constants of the being grow for larger wholes (larger c-like speeds) made of smaller informative parts (denser h-like informative positions). And this implies that outside the galatom, there must be other scales, with larger than c speeds and lower than h-uncertainties-temperatures, informative ‘cooler’ orders – more focused angles of perception – similar jargons…

SO the compound constant of the 5th dimension for the galatom is simple and as such it will be all pervading when considering the meaning of the ‘real constants’ of the Universe:

5D Galatom Supœrganism’s metric: $(c) ð (h) = Constant.

How then can we relate the ‘human’ constants of perception (length, mass and time) to the galatom’s ‘real objective, natural constants’?

Easy… As there was a genius of physics that figure them out:

*G, the constant of curvature that encases the quantum world and absorbs its ‘energy’ to make it emerge in the upper cosmological scale. Thus the key constants of space and time can be extracted from them, as we shall do in our posts on physics.*

*vortex of accelerated frequency, hence the proper measure of time is angular acceleration, 1/t², which in Planck’s natural units render*~~h~~G/cˆ5, getting rid of the meaningless ‘root’. So goes for lineal distance: in the bidimensional universe where all line has volume as it is made of fractal points, the unit of space is ‘area’ and so we get rid of the root again: Area=hG/c³.

*time and space have the same units but time has a c², reproductive factor added. So we might say that a worldcycle of time, is the reproductive sum of a ‘step in space’ in enough numbers to complete the worldcycle.*

*the maximal quantity of mass-energy that the galaxy can enclose by volume of space; and so we must consider G the constant of scale, H, the constant of information-time-angular momentum and c, the constant of reproduction of information or ‘motion’ as the 3 constants that define the ‘domain’ of a galatom, and Q, shown to be merely the same metric reduced to the quantum scale with the unification of both, the other limiting vortex of time of the galatom.*

*a different region of the Universe.*

As in the same manner that hc and temperature emerges as ‘cold mass’ in the cosmological scale of the galatom, for the same token, mass in our scale should be transfered to the dark world of the halo of likely heavy ultradense quarks beyond the c-speed limit and the 0 K activity of temperature…

**The parameters of the main physical scales of the Universe.**

The first form of space and first expression of the ∆-gravitational scale symmetry is c-speed.

In the translation of 4D physics to 5 Ð Physics, we start from c-speed, the constant, then we multiply C= $p x ðƒ = Length x Angular frequency (in Planck Units).

On the other hand the principle of relativity translates into the principle of Galileo the gal ilea paradox: all moves and has form at the same time.

Light therefore splits into space-distance, and time-frequency, and its constancy in 4D is particular case of the Sp x ðƒ constancy of the 5th dimension.

And for that reason we DO have a close similarity between the Metrics of a given plane of the 5^{th} dimension:

∆= $p x ðƒ and the equations of energy of each Plane of the Universe:

∆ : $p x ðƒ ≈ Energy : Constant of Space-action x Frequency:

*In the graph, the 3 main constants of space-time of the physical Universe, of the 3 scales among which human beings interact. Those constants, the boatsman constant of our ∆-thermodynamic scale, the c-speed constant of cosmological space-time and the H-planck quanta of electromagnetic space time are 3 Universes in themselves.*

On the other hand , in the right we see the minimal space-time quanta of the ∆-1 quantum scale, ~~h~~, which therefore has the same metric equation:

$p x ðƒ = ~~h~~ = E x I , the uncertainty equation of Heisenberg that merely states the constancy and minimal quanta of space-time of the quantum scale. Between both we are sandwiched with the informative clocks of temperature and the minimal quanta of space-time called a Boltzman quanta.

In the graph, we can see the main species of the physical Universe, a charge and a mass, which clock-like accelerated vortices of smaller and larger space-time membranes, and the middle thermodynamic scale we inhabit.

The 2 time-space vortices, charges and masses, which are the limiting scales of the Fractal Universe perceived by human beings, thus become now crystal clear in its nature. In between them, there is the thermodynamic scale of forms of matter, *which is more complex, because we perceive all its information and it is connected to the other 2 scales with whom it exchanges energy and information through different flows and parameters which we shall study in detail in the physical blogs, beyond the simple concepts of this introduction.*

Let us then move one with the more general principles that apply to all systems of the Universe, considering now the geometry of space and time, its bidimensional fractal-network nature, and how both combine to form those 5 Dimensional systems.

**C, H, K: 5D ****GALATOM’S**** CONSTANTS **

Two immediate consequences of this duality of stopping and moving, particle and wave states are evident. First we find an ¡logic cause to the constancy of light speed: particles in still state entangled when they emit bosons of information, regardless of the motion around them, in its fractal local space, so c-speed is always measured as c.

It is then obvious that even locomotion the less relevant dimotion is more than a simple measure of ‘speed’. ONLY obsessed physicists as high priests of time with his shallow ‘brief history’ of those ‘5 Dimotions reduced to the LOWER actions=dimotions of life, entropy and locomotion can really think tracing speeds and worldlines is the meaning of its existence. Because physicists make weapons of mass destruction unable to love even their own species and so do humans embedded in a civilization of machines of entropy and dog-eat-dog people, who cannot emerge as a social global organism as even the smallest particles do becoming social atoms… we have converted the less important arrows in the meaning of the Universe.

But in that constant S-T, stop and MOVE, game of information and motion, it il NOT with locomotions, overrated and exhaustively studied by humans but with its inverse Dimotion, that of the mind that perceives in stillness. So there is a duality between motion and stillness, which allow us to define the state of ‘mind perception’.

Which finally leads us to the last element we cannot avoid any longer to fully define the Universe in both objective and subjective terms, the 2 dimensions of the Mind, as a membrain, self-centered into a singularity whose linguistic mappings and ternary syntax reflects the world of ternary beings of space-time in which the being exists, performing its survival actions.

Specifically in the Light space-time ‘galatom superorganism’ in which humans co-exist, all systems have a speed of reproduction of information of c-speed above which all the other planes of light exist¡ence happen. So as the system becomes more complex its motion implies the reproduction of multiple layers of being, in adjacent ‘wave-like’ states of reproduction of information.

And so the fastest form is the one that must reproduce less information, life itself, all other particles, atoms and atomic configurations are slower.

Because C-speed is the speed of reproduction of information along all the ∆±¡ scales of a system, it follows that larger systems that try to be synchronous as supœrganisms must have constants of reproduction of speed, faster.

What other ‘constants’ matter to a system? Obviously a system must have 3 constants, for the 3 parts of the being.

So we define the 3 physiological constants of physics in terms of its 3 ‘galatom’s parts’ and scales:

**c or rather c²**to keep the bidimensional holographic principle of information, is the constant of maximal speed of reproduction of form in the ∆+¡ relative planes of galatom’s ‘fractals’ (all of us made of evolved light particles). In fact all systems of nature should be able to reproduce form as ‘light space-time systems’ at c-speed. However as this happens in different scales; the larger parts of the galaxy as they reproduce through the path of c-speed diminish its translation, in an inverse form to the in-form-ation they must reproduce: V (ST) = $(λ) x ƒ (ð). If in terms of scale, it must be considered the constant of the ∆+1 gravitational scales, in terms of topology it must considered the constant of the vital ‘plenum’ body-wave of energy of the galatom as a superorganism. As such is the main constant of our island-universes.**h or rather h/2π=**is the constant of ‘informative gauging’, the ‘particle-state’ constant, the informative particle-head constant of all systems of light that gauge information in reality, and as such is the second most important constant of Nature. It belongs to the ∆-¡ planes. h will then become all pervading in theory of information and the building of all kind of social structures with particles and atoms. H is measured as Energy x Time or Momentum x Distance, which gives us the ‘long time’ cyclical and ‘short time’ open paths of the ‘Galilean paradox’ (all lineal motions become closed paths with enough time, momentum becomes energy and distance in space motion in time).~~h,~~**K**is then the constant of ‘motion-entropy’, for all atomic systems in the intermediate thermodynamic plane of reality; and as such it corresponds to the ‘limbic/potential’, moving elements of atomic supœrganisms, made to the image and likeness of its larger supœrganism, the galatom, in its ∆º ‘human-size’ plane. K is measured in terms of entropy also.

And so we have 3 constants of Nature to define the galatom, each of them normally associated to a ‘parameter’ of frequency of its time cycles to give us the time-energy total for the system measured. This implies each of those 3 constants will associate to a ‘membrane’-frequency parameter specific for each local system:

- Mass, the enclosure for energy systems at the cosmological scale, which allows when an energy is enclosed within a domain to calculate its ‘weight’ or frequency of its angular enclosure as a mass vortex of accelerated time (Principle of equivalence mass-acceleration: E=hƒ+e=mc2, M=ƒ(h/c2).
- ƒrequency for the quantum-photon scale, or rather density of photons in a single point of space, in its color configuration, for the quantum h-scale: E=hv
- Temperature, for the entropic, human thermodynamic ¡0 plane, which also measures the ‘frequency’ of vibration of an enclosed ‘gas-like’ system’ as perceived thermodynamically in the UPPER scale above the quantum ensemble of particles and molecules it is enclosing with the concept of ‘heat-temperature’ of the upper scale.

It also follows that those ‘enclosures’ – frequency of a radiation measured in the upper plane, temperature of a molecular ensemble also measured in the upper plane, and gravitational mass of an ensemble measured in the cosmological scale, *are ∆+1 membrane enclosures of ∆º relative ensembles and as such the parameters of frequency, temperature and mass belong to a larger plane than the vital energy particles they trap. The minimal quanta of each scale, h, c and k become in this manner ‘gatherered’ to extract from them from the perspective of the larger scale energy, entropy or information: h accumulate in a single parameter of ‘wholeness’ as a color perceived by our electronic eyes, which extract information from it; k becomes then multiplied by nT to give us the ‘whole heat’ sensation provided by the system from where we shall extract motion; and *

It is difficult to stress the importance of the 3 vital constants of the galatom, in all formulae of physics, which will study normally ‘fractal supœrganisms’ of matter within the galatom and its 5 Dimotions of exist¡ence. And the *ginormous number of conceptual insights we can get in all fields of physics but the proper understanding in organic terms of the vital constants of Nature, and physical systems, which will loose its ‘abstract’ outlook. *

How this work will require a thorough analysis of each of the main equations of physics, but it seems obvious that those dimotions involving entropic actions such as radiation, will see a ‘decay’ of exponential nature (the maximal speed of dissolution of any function of nature), involving ratios that transform one of those parameters into the other constants, such as in the equations of radiation (Planck’s law), where we observe the constant of decay, transforming kT into hƒ and vice versa, as temperature becomes radiation or radiation is upgraded into measure as heat (and appears as a huge temperature, which is not the proper way to measure it, since we should just refer in the quantum scale to frequencies, being temperature the untranslatable state for measuring molecular activity).

We could in that sense more properly consider that frequency is ‘grouped’ into ‘colors’ of temperature, and ‘transfers’ its activity to the higher scale, beyond the Curie limit.

By the same token in the other direction, we could consider that ‘heat’ is transferred to mass and so mass systems ‘cool down’ the previous scale as they acquire mass-energy (translation movement in the upper scale).

Now to fully grasp that graph, and the meaning of tose equations we must understand the meaning of a conservative energy cycle. Energy is not spent when there is no motion in a given length of time. Thus time can be run without end in energy conservaton terms, as long as we return always to the same point doing a time cycle. The principle of conservation of energy ths become the principle of repetition of presents, whih are sums of time cycles in which a trajectory returns to a point. In this manner we can resume all those principles is the Generator equation of energy and time:

∑E∆-1<≈> ∏ T∆

-And the discontinuous, quantum nature of space, which carries the kinetic energy of the Universe in its constant motions (proved by quantum physics, by the life and death cycle of biological systems, and the principles of conservation of energy, shown in the left side picture, where we describe the 3 fundamental scales of the Universe, and its co-invariant, product of the speed of its time clocks and spatial quanta, conserved as a product: E=hƒ, E=knT, E=mc²)

*So human sciences, all of which use time and space parameters, are in sore need to change its paradigm, in its description of the scalar space-time fractal structure of the Universe, if they want to advance in its comprehension of reality.*

**Physical Systems of self-centered space-time.**

In the graph we can see 3 of such scales and its relative size and speed measure in frequency (the inverse of lineal time duration: T=1/ƒ=1/Tiƒ, whereas Tiƒ is the fundamental symbol for cyclical time): The galaxy, the human and the DNA. Those scales create in groups of 3 ∆±1 ‘universal planes’, complex organic systems, in which the faster speeds and information of smaller systems, codes larger wholes, which in turn control the motions of the smaller systems. And those are precisely the organic properties of the Universe, which extend also to physical systems.

Now, in the Human Universe, the previous equation has an immediate lecture in terms of the fundamental Universal Constants of the Universe:

C-light speed, which is the parameter of space-motion (Spe) of our Universe, and calculates the speed of reproduction of information across the scales of the 5th dimension.

quanta of information which is the minimal Tiƒ unit of information, and multiplied by 2π, gives us the minimal time cycle, H-Planck of our Universe.

And so both together, c become the minimal unit of space-time of the Universal reality.

How those minimal space-time Units ‘scale’ in the 3 scales of physical reality, the ∆-1 quantum, electromagnetic scale, the ∆+1 gravitation scale and the human, thermodynamic scale?

Easy. They form the 2 fundamental species of those scales: charge and mass. Indeed, in Planck Units we define the minimal dual charge and dual mass forming a system of electromagnetic or gravitational space-time as:

Qp x Qp = c (SxT) /K ∆-1

Mp x Mp = c (SxT) /G ∆+1

Thus a charge field basically is a Universal space-time, ST, hc, curved extremely by the constant of the quantum scale of the 5th dimension, Ke, till forming a vortex like space-time species.

And a mass field is basically the same, curved by a constant, G, which form a much larger scale, (a Planck mass is huge compared to a plank charge).

**II. MATHEMATICAL CONSTANTS**

The body wave that reproduces is wide, the wave-dimension. Bodies are wide.

Length is the dimotion of field-potential speed, limbs speed, simple, lineal motions over the entropy of a lower scale. The body-wave however balances both head and limbs. Height is the dimension of particles-heads.

Dimotions of space-time are really cyclical and with a point of view; the singularity or Tƒi point of maximal information either in the center or top of the height dimension of information that commands the whole structure and enacts apperceptively, consciously or vegetatively a program of existence, which ensures the survival of the whole and has ‘appeared’ naturally either by selection or by trial and error after infinite eons – since those species who do not tender for their territorial vital space, and feed it with energy and guide it with proper linguistic mapping-information have not survived and reproduced. So the sum of the actions of those mind points is what becomes as observed simultaneously a whole supœrganism of ‘exi=stence’.

So the point of view becomes focus of multiple arrows, cycles o space-time, how it his managing them, through invagination and palingenesis of a more complex being.

So each super organism in space is a knot of space-time cyclical actions in time:

In graph, a time-functon of development and differentiation which follows a mathematical ratio. bEING THE UNIVERSE, A GAME OF RELATIVE SCALES, ratios are what it measures. And three are its main ratios:

- ∂s/∂t: speed of space.
- ∂t/∂s: density of information
- v x ρ= 1

Whereas the one, is the Knotted mind-being, an ageing species moving through social scales of planes of existence, describes the actions of space-time arrows from the perspective of the whole supœrganism of §paœ, ‘social, vital, simultaneous space’.

Indeed, ‘minds produce bidimensional space-time actions that exchange entropy, energy and information with the world outside and the intrinsic hyperbolic ∆-1 world of cellular parts inside.

As such beings are knotted space-time cyclical constant action perceived in simultaneous space as a species of physical, biological or social space-time, whose varieties through scales are the details of reality, the larger view below the final ‘unifying layer of gst isomorphic laws.

And the simplest way to define one of such variety of species is by its ratios of density, scale and speed, its fundamental…

**III. BIOLOGICAL, VITAL CONSTANTS**

‘The ultimate principles of science must depart from the simplest Universal constants, e, pi and the like’ (Einstein quoted from memory).

‘The world cycle of existence is determined by i, 0, 1, √2, phi, e and π which describe the world cycle of existence, in each of 3 ages acting as the standing points for a Lagrangian zero sum of all the actions of the space-time organism. We are born between i and 0, becoming a whole at 1, which will start a second growth, by sexual reproduction at √2, differentiating in proportion to phi between our 3 component parts, which start an exponential growth, in e³ stages till reaching 20 units in space or time, during our second age, which collapses inwards, through pi-warping, till death reverses the process into an e¯³ decay, death’. (Sancho, quoted from intelligence)

In biology, those constants are far more complex in its ‘elements’, and are called vital constants, studied partially in greater detail as ‘balance states’ of the being.

While s x t, THE MOMENTUM, IS EQUIVALENT TO THE ‘TOP PREDATOR POWER’ OF THE SYSTEM. That is, the system with maximal momentum, means with better brain and stronger body, becomes the top predator system that dominates and reproduces.

As it is the case in physics, where the densest, fastest ‘black hole’ devours all other physical forms.

**SUMMARY**

**Introduction. **Beings as knots of Constant, cyclical space-time motions/actions.

**I. ∆•ST:** Types of Constants.

**II. **Conservation Principles.

**III**. A classification of Constants for each organic being in 7 groups.

**IV.** Examples in physical, biological and social systems.

**Abstract.** The generator equation of fractal space-time beings (ab. GST, Γ) is created by dynamic ∆-1 finitesimal exchanges of energy and information, which define ratios of Spe/Tiƒ entropy/information relationships. They are the Universal constants that become the fundamental partial equations of parts of the fractal generator:

Spe≤≥ st ≤≥Tiƒ

For example, the partial equation, ∑ Spe≤≥ Tiƒ is defined by the pi constant that turns around the interval 3 (hexagonal pi) 3+1/3 (10/3), as its limits for a different form of lineal transformations into cyclical information. As such is the fundamental constant of the Universe of world cycles.

## MATHEMATICAL CONSTANTS.

The first expression of Ðimotions are mathematical constants that establish her relationships between the String and its action-vibrations. The simplest one being, ∏ $

All this said of course, mathematics is with words and images, the three dominant, spatial, temporal and space-time languages of the human mind and as such they are very good mirrors of reality. To the point that maths, the less understood by man (which is a verbal, visual I=eye>wor(l)d basically), as it seems to be a better language for ‘digital machines’, natural to them; seems so often magic, when it reflects reality.

It is in that sense part, its richness as a mirror, part the human limits of thought what makes math so ill-understood and revered. So we shall introduce a few concepts of that ‘mirror-reflection’ before we apply them to mathematical physics.

… STARTING from what Einstein considered the ‘initial elements’ of reality (of the mirroreality of mathematics we would say). Its universa constants.

**e, p(h)i. ****Beings as Knots of Constant ****Cyclic Space-Time Actions**

We said that the Universe is absolutely relative, and so we can ono investigate potentials and ratios, not more is needed. And since we start with bidimensional entropy and information, only three combinations of presents, four if we consider the inverse to be different in multiplication, main ‘group’ parameters:

∂s/∂t or speed, ∂t/∂s or density and ∂s x ∂ t or momentum.

In practice though the change of ages of a being from an age dominant in speed through an age of ‘unitarianism’, s/t x t/s= present momentum, must be account for each physical constant with different speeds.

So there is a more fundamental form of a game of ratios? Indeed, that of mathematical constants, which reflect better the game of all games.

And the first of those ratios are the Universal constants of density, pi, momentum, e and speed,

*In graph, the 2 fundamental mathematical and physical constants of Nature*

*We shall depart from their ‘unification’ to explain how the Universe creates reality departing from those ‘perfect rations of energy and information’. As such G and Q can be easily unified as two space time vortices of 2 scales of nature, the quantum and gravitational scale, showing the ratios between distance/speed/lineal space and time cycles/curvatures.*

*The 3 main constants of mathematics are directly related to the fundamental generator of space-time:*

*pi, relates the transformation of spatial field of entropy into a vortex of temporal information: 3 x ( Spe) > ∏ Tiƒ.**e the constant of the only function, which is a derivative of itself, eª represents the fundamental function of reproduction of any system, at the lower ‘cellular scale’, as the system increases by a derivative at each step.Or in terms of 3: e+e/10=3, where 10 is the commonest growth ‘finitesimal’ as 10, is the simplest ‘whole organism’, with 3 x 3 ‘corners’ that represent the 3 arrows of time and a 10th central unit, the mind that ‘transcends’ as the 1 of a higher social scale.*- Phi, the golden ratio is essentially the demising ratio that relates the entropic ‘length’ and ‘informative’ height of a bidimensional ‘page of information, whereas ST=φ and Tiƒ=1. Therefore it is connected to the proportion of energy needed to breed an ‘informative’ head. Yet both the particle and the body-wave arise from a field of entropy, and so if we consider the whole to be Spe, the field of entropy which feeds both: Spe= ST+Tiƒ, gives us the golden ratio and once more, ST gives rise to the particle head, in a series of inclusive parts. So Spe, the whole is to ST as ST is to Tiƒ.
- Logarithmic functions represent the explosive growth of the first age of the system. After it reaches maturity it decays inversely, exponentially in the curve of death, forming together and intersecting function.

*To notice that both, π (+3.14) and e (2.81) are close to 3 by a minimal difference of +0.1, as ultimately the curvature of 3 lineal elements makes a larger cycle with aperture-wholes, while the reproduction of a system extracts energy from its ternary parts to reproduce an infinitesimal or transfer a quanta of energy to the larger whole, x².*

**Abstract: **Dynamically we can define any space-time being as a knot of cyclical space-time actions, ruled by the simple metric of 5D which define the parameters, limits and gradients of its exchanges of energy and information, with the different planes of the ∆-universe.

It is the detailed analysis of bit and bite by bit and bite of the being, as its r=evolves in its world cycles, pushed by quantum motions and stops that consume and feed its energy, ±∆3, splitting the ratios of energy and information of a ‘smaller being’; or ratios between the information and energy of a system, that gives us its ‘exi=st-ential power, in actions that put together as universal constants. Or exchanges of information in processes of social evolution that happen often in decametric scales, and measured as a population in space or process of evolution in time will show also its numeral constants.

Such constants tend to be constants of actions or ratios of feeding and perceiving energy and information or social evolution, and it will affect to ∆±∞ species of scales. Yet from the human ∆0 perspective, when they belong to huge super organisms (earth, galaxy, universe) they tend to be considered ‘universal’ and treated with the abstract reductionism of physics. They are though not different from the vital constants of local biological beings, and its functions are similar for the whole organism of the Universe. Consider for example, the Lamba cosmological constant that merely defines the 3 ages of an EFE space-time (gravitational). If it changes from 0 to ±0, it will define one of the 3 ‘topological ages’ of the Universe, the elliptic, hyperbolic or flat, old steady state, young age of the Universe.

Other constants represent flows between ∆±1 scales, when two species exchange energy and information ,as part of their social activity and creation of symbiotic space-time cycles.

Thus constants express form and function and ratios of energy and information, within the generator equation. It follows that each system of the Universe has its constants. And while we seem obsessed by physical constants of the larger Universe, those are a small part of them.

Indeed, the number of Universal constants of the larger super organisms of mankind – the galaxy-universe and its symmetries in the lower ∆-3 scale, the atom – is far inferior though to the enormous number of local constants, as the creative Universe form resonant frequencies, synchronicities and flows of energy and information between ∆st• beings constantly.

Finally to notice that those constants are dynamic motions and exchanges of energy and information. So while here we treat them mostly quantitatively in the next isomorphism, we develop them from a qualitative point of view.

Now the fact that mathematical constants are RATIOS NOT NUMBERS, AND HENCE IRRATIONAL NUMBERS ARE RATIOS TOO, and they are most of the numbers of the real line sets up the possibility of infinite mathematical games of existence encoded in the ratios of those irrational numbers. But ratios of what? Normally of topological *motions which exchange energy and information, between parts or entities of the Universe. So they are ultimately the constants of time motions of the Universe, * which change state along its ternary elements of Γ=GST and dual or ternary ‘social structures and networks’.

Now, in as much as pi and e are the constant ratios of the 2 main events of the Universe, an Spe≤>Tiƒ transform of entropy into information; an ∆±1 scaling growth or motion of entropy and information between scales and its combined reproductive motions; we can find that most fundamental equations of mathematical supœrganisms and world cycles can be interpreted in terms of those numbers. But the proper way to see those numbers are as preferred points of a larger cycle, the circle and the hyperbola, which becomes in this way the 2 limits of the conic bidimensional S, st, T, elements of the holographic Universe:

In the graph, all curves are conic sections, of which the 2 extremes of inversion of sp<st>tiƒ orientations are the hyperbola and the circle, with the related second closed curve of the ellipse and the parabola. So we can classify them as MAX. tiƒ=circle, defined by the ratio Spe>Tiƒ AND WE could signify by the concept S=T, Pi, the hyperbola, whose function is S=1/T, its inverse, the perfect entropic function both of pure predatory death and pure exponential growth, whose most perfect form can be defined by e. And then the intermediate quadratic and elliptic forms in between, with its infinite 0° solutions, in its variations of ‘elliptic information’ and parabolic energy (the intermediate ST forms) as the pure circle and the pure hyperbola does not really exist, but are the perfect i-logic forms… (irrational ratios).

**√2**

The growth of reality between two scales starts with the √2 a bidimensional triangular pair, which starts the growth on dimensions of information, and space-extension by reproduction of the same event through a series of different forms of growth:

Let us then analyse this first event and its variations. Two lines of thought, the particles 1 x and 1 y, meet themselves in the relative 0 point, of an x-y automatically created coordinates, which will give us an √2, wave with origin in o, and an xy, expansion front of space-time, reproduced by pairs of xy points along the front-wave till √2 reaches the two ‘membranes of the x y tail of past momentum’.

At this point √2 can be measured as a sum of discontinuous wave-points, and gives us a variation of ±1, or be considered as a continuous wave of energy; never mind, in both descriptions we have created a bidimensional, triangular, straight triangle, which can now grow in different 0/0 tangents to the exponential wave of its second age, of geometric growth.

**The constants of motion. Building blocks of reality**

It is then evident that the key to function perception is to model the different equalities as different entities that co-exist together in ∆±1 wav particle or field states, unveiling of an ∆ºSt±1 organism different parts in dynamic relationships of transference of entropy, information and energy between different parts of the being:

All this said, we are writing in a sequential order the isomorphisms of the Universe for a reason, as they are closely related in ‘pairs’. So the defining quantitative element of those motions are its ‘constant ratios’ and functions, which describes them in terms of algebraic operandi and space and time values. We can then wonder, which is the fundamental equation or Universal, mathematical physical, mental, topological or organic-biological constant for each of those 8 motions of the Universe.

It is self-evident that those constants will be the simplest, most repeated constants of reality. So we can easily realise that:

*The constant of the 2 motions of information is ±pi,*which converts lineal into cyclical form. In the perceptive motion the constant will curve inwards the flow of energy, and radially select from its apertures, the relevant information to map out reality. In the communicating case, it will be a trigonometric π-wave of sines and cosines. But in both cases information will be preserved in the frequency and form of those pi cycles. Hence for transformations of lineal entropy into cyclical information we always find a πi constant.- THE CONSTANT OF THE 2 motions of growth and diminution is ±eª, as e=(1+1/a)ª, clearly represents the growth of a whole system, by 1 finitesimal cellular part, 1/a, in a times; and viceversa, its diminution along the same proportions – hence for growth and decay, we always find an e-constant.
- The constant of reproduction is often related to the golden ratio and its variations on the Fibonacci series, from his famous ‘2 rabbits reproducing rabbits’, for complex informative systems, but for pure translative motion, the λ-wave length of the moving form is the specific ‘constant of reproduction’ of each waveform. And in explosive ratios of growth between scales, we shall often find pure logarithmic scales in base 3×3+0 (the perfect tetraktys) or e-numbers of ∆-1 unit growth.
- So this leaves us the 2 remaining motions, which are processes of emergence and dissolution of the being across an ∆±1 discontinuum of existence, which cannot be measured with absolute precision as information disappears or it is newly created within scales. So there is a certain degree of uncertainty, which will be the constant to use for each ‘different space scale’, in the case of physical scales, the well known constants of H-planck (quantum uncertainty), entropy (Boltzmann constant) and cosmological constant for the dark matter, beyond c-speed and below ∆0 Temperature. So there is not a clear ‘universal constant’ as each different super organism and its different scalar planes requires a specific analysis of its own. But again we find often this finitesimal quanta to be 1/n, and hence also related to the e number (1 +1/n)ˆn; as emergence and dissolution might be considered the final stage or ‘limiting barrier’ of an e-progression

So 2 mathematical constants are found everywhere in the Universe and suffice almost to describe everything:

Pi the* constant of Spe≤≥Tiƒ transformations and e, the constant of ∆º±1 transformations.*

**The beauty of 3. Pi=+3 & e+e/10=3, the major constants.**

The most beautiful part of this blog is in that sense, the enormous simplicity of the fundamental equations of the fifth dimension and its immediate connection with the simple elements o reality, which by iteration of its dual and ternary principles we and future researchers shall raise through the 4 lines of this blog to encompass all what exist.

In such a simple, iterative Universe, where there are only 2 ‘fundamental events’:

A motion in the 5th dimension between scales.

And a transformation of lineal entropy into cyclical information and vice versa,

As Einstein wanted the ultimate principles of reality are Universal ratios/constants, which transform space into time or rise through the scales of the 5th dimension, a reproductive sum of parts into a whole. So we shall find 2 absolute magic ratios in all systems:

π: 3|s>Ot: Pi, transforms back and forth lineal entropy into temporal information, through cycles or sinusoidal hyperbolic waves.

∆±i: e is the constant of growth and diminution that rises a group through the scales of the 5th dimension: e= (1+1/n)ˆn.

Now, why those pi, e, values exist and no others is the next layer of understanding of Universal constants. Since the 3 are closely related… to 3, ah the beauty of trinity, which only I and God seems to have understood (: and Saint Augustine, just kidding:)

Pi is indeed 3 in excess, exactly 3 in the hexagon; e is 3=e +e/10, in defect of a classic growth of one tenth every ‘part’.

Phi is another scalar argument: the whole (trinity) is to the larger part (body) as the larger part (body) is to the smaller one (head).

So we are finding *some perfect ratios, harmonic, the first pi (on the interval from 3-the hexagonal pi to 3.14, the circular pi), and the second e is the ratio of growth of a ten dimensional tetraktys, one by one, as 2.718..+0.271..=2.99…*

The absolute truths of this specific universe are encoded into those numbers; so are many mysteries yet to resolve by science. They are all pervading, but what they really mean? And why they are so closer, yes you guess it… to 3, and how many of its decimals matter?

A couple of teasers on this last question:

You need only 39 pi decimals to calculate the horizon of the universe, with the precision of a single atom; *yet 10ˆ39 is the difference between the gravitational cosmic force and the quantum force of the atom.*

Today, students in elementary schools routinely use the estimate of 22/7, as archimedes did, for it, which despite its simplicity is only 0.04% off its correct value.

Phi thus is the number of the palingenesis, or inner distribution of growth, during the first age of the being, above 1; e is the number of scalar growth, above 2 : e+e/10= 3…

And Pi, above 3, is the number that converts entropy into information, (Poincare’s conjeture).

And of course pi and e are ever present, around 3. Of its many definitions the one mathematicians ignore of e, is the more proper one, e+ e/10 = 3, a unit of growth of the perfect game of decametric scales of social numbers, which is a good way to introduce…

**The power of first principles: mathematical constants as a proof of dark matter.**

How important those simplest constants are can be seen considering some simple solutions of mathematical physics, which have cost enormous experimental effort in classic physics. We often bring here the two of cosmology – the meaning and proportion of dark matter, and the meaning and value of the G constant of gravitation, both only obtained with experimental evidence, but which are rather trivial theoretical results from GST.

So let us consider one of those conundrums. What is dark matter? We shall see *how a simple thought experiment reveals as the Greeks and Einsteins always knew much more than machines of huge cost, for the cheap price of a few words and a kilo of old grey healthy matter. Indeed, it took millions of $ to calculate the dark matter of the Universe. Another trivial margin (:*

How simple indeed can be the answer to all the great questions?

Extremely simple as 3 is really a small number and the numbers around it, suffice to explain the 3 ages of life.

So all the important numbers of science turn around 1, 2 and 3, which as Einstein put it would have to be ‘the final essential constants that reflect best the game of existence’ :

Yet pi is not perfect. And if we were to consider the real pi of nature, as all ‘membranes’ do have ‘holes’ through which parallels of entropy and information cross, we would say that a membrane is π=3+0.14 apertures, through which the singularity mind in the center can see behind the membrane, the outer world. So we have always a 96% of dark matter, which allows us to see through: π-3/π

How much of dark matter there is? We know is 96% and we see only 4%. Again this took enormous effort of machines to measure it, but it is another ‘proof on the margin’, once you understand properly maths. We said that pi is NOT perfect. In fact, the closure of pi is 3 lineal parts that become a closed topology. It is the hexagonal pi (perimeter 3, radius 1) the strongest polygon; and that of the most curved gravitational space in relativity. But if we consider that 3 diameters of entropy create a circle, then there are 0.14 potential windows to see from its center, surrounded by the dark matter halo.

This means: π-3/3=4% of reality is WHAT we see. And indeed 96% of reality is invisible dark matter and energy, ‘screened’ by the halo. We are *inside a relative gravitational **gala cell and the homunculus should know his position in the Universe, which likely if we could see it all would look much more as a local organism till the horizon beyond we cannot even see that 4%.*

**NUMBERS**.

Now, once we have solved a simple example with the ‘first layer of mathematical reality’, its Universal constants, we can give a try to the second layer, ‘numbers’. You might of course consider that constants are ratios of numbers, and they are. So what are numbers?

The answer is numbers are ‘the sequential, temporal view of points, the simultaneous spatial view’. So numbers and points are the time-space species of mathematics, its foundational elements (NOT sets, categories or any other axiomatic imaginary arrogant mind-madness of human selfie mathematicians, indeed Cantor ended in a madhouse, but before converted mathematics in a mad-science with its ‘sets’ – the mind category that substituted the real ‘beings’ experimentally sound, ‘fractal points’ with inner volume (∆º) and its equivalent sequential elements in time, numbers.

This of course, is just the start, to build complex space-time systems in several dimensions, which polynomial functions, which are ‘functions’ that cover several scales of the fifth dimension. And we do have analysis which does the same exploration of parts and wholes in a more sophisticated way. But all *those functions will ultimately be mirrors of the 3 elements of all languages that reflect the 3 space-time elements of the Universe: *

F(s) < Operandi/ST-action > G (T)

Reason why, and it is astounding we have to stay this, mathematics works so well as a mirror of so many systems, due to its capacity to carry so much detailed information about their spatial entropy and temporal information, and the operandi/actions that combine them. But alas, Mr. Hilbert changed all this for ‘his mind images’ as he couldn’t figure out the fractal points of Lobacjevski and he joined forces with Mr. Cantor’s paradoxes and paradises of ‘sets’ – another mind construct to substitute the number. And so they founded the axiomatic method – which of course Godel, Einstein’s best friend proved wrong, as Broglie and then Bohm, Einstein’s favourite student did with the Copenhagen ego. Do you think mathematicians who had entered their own ‘godlike’ paradise, as the only ‘language’ which existed and proved within itself (in its imaginary sets and points with no breath) cared?

No, they just started a runaway train of ever more complicated distortions of the beautiful mirror of geometric points, social numbers and its organic functions, as Copenhagen did, to make it all *so complex nobody could understand, and alas! they could dismiss forever since any criticism as experts into the language of God, like priests talking latin, Allah talking arab, and bankers issuing go(l)d in toxic derivatives nobody understood. *

This is the trick: to make the language inflationary, multiplying its ‘ptolemaic epicycles’ to pass as an expert of something you no longer understand or refer to reality.

It is then evident that fractal Non-E *points in space and numbers in time are the ‘real’ units of mathematics, which refer to the real elements of the Universe; not sets and imaginary points, neither physical theories based in inflationary distortions of the mathematical reality. *

Then instead of GOING up in complexity, we can go down in simplicity to the real Universe of space points and temporal numbers, and show that the structure of ‘social numbers’ the minimal units of temporal algebra, *have the properties of discontinuous time cycles, similar but not equal to the continuous, simultaneous space surfaces, and keep illuminating the world with mathematics. For example, *the first, oldest simplest conundrum we notice when we realise points are continuous space and numbers discontinuous time is the oldest paradox of maths: the explanation of why in geometry pi & √2 exist, but in algebra, we ‘miss’ its perfect closure as numbers are discontinuous, so *all algebraic formulae of √2 miss a ±1; and all approximations to π, are slightly above or below.*

And so we must consider that *for systems of most ternary ∆±1 scales this is its value.*

*Almost a interesting is the 0.04%>0.4% > 4% scalar series. As 4% happens to be the ‘openings left’ **in a pi cycle, with only 3 diameters… π-3/π=4%, the quantity of open space seeing from inside the circle, which gives a 96% of dark matter to an observer inside a circle of any pi-related spiral-like structure, as it happens in the Universe at large (per-cent-age of dark matter). *

It i then important to realise the dynamics around the perfect numbers, 0, 1, 2, 3 from where all other systems can be deduced, in lower and upper scales, which normally do not need the full range of the irrational number, but with 3 or 10 digits suffice to establish the ∆º±1 or decametric scales of reality.

**e**

In that sense 3 is indeed the number and 10 the series. Consider the case of the other key number of reality:

*e+e/10=3. The scalar Universe, we shall see soon, has 10 decametric scales, but e breaks its regularity after 10 decimals: 2’718282828..459*

… And those 2 Euler equations yes, what truly ‘i’ means?

NOW THE FIRST EQUATION is the equation of the zero-worldcycle, only observing the beginning and the end. The second equation is the equation of the world cycle with all its internal fluctuations, and possibilities as pi is not closed, the angle is not COMPLETE.

**Phi, the ‘minor’ universal constant: the golden ratio.**

While phi is the golden ratio of proportions of the 3 topological parts of the being, expressly the commonest ratio of the function Tiƒ (height)/Spe (length), proper of a bidimensional form of in-form-ation.

Thus the answer to why those are the constants of nature and no others is obvious: ONCE THOSE RATIOS CAN BE understood as the perfect algebraic expression of the main motions/events of any species of ternary Spe<ST>Tiƒ elements in the Universe, CERTAINLY, those ratios/events are more efficient and SURVIVE BETTER AS THEY ARE MORE HARMONIC.

Why those ratios exist is obvious, given the analytic and geometric properties of the golden ratio of which the less quoted is curiously the most important: φ²-φ=1

In essence the a-b ratio determines the internal relationship as relative ST>Tiƒ dimensions of a holographic sheet of entropy/energy and/or information, where the reproductive energy is the *previous part of which a more informative element offshoots, with less size, as in the proportions of the human figure:*

For example in the growth of plants, arms and any lineal one-dimensional or spiral 2-dimensional structure, each new ‘element’ of the ternary structure, which will have a relative more ‘informative’ role in relationship with the previous element, will have therefore to compensate to balance the ‘5D metric’ equation of both parts together (S x T = K), with a smaller size according to the golden ratio.

It follows that on general basis a ‘sheet of bidimesional information’, i.e. the human head, the screen of a computer/page has also the X-Y, (S-T) elements in a golden ratio.

What is important of a bidimensional growth through the golden ratio (which must be understood as the ratio of the inner structure of growth, coupled therefore to e, the ratio of outer structure and √2, the ratio of dual growth from 2 relative S-T poles), is that it is self-centred in a central seed, or informative singularity which will therefore use the ratio to ‘fill’ the inner space hold by the external membrane, invaginating with its cells the internal space-time, *maintaining its balance as distance and weight, the ST elements of the growth process remain always equal with the spiral distribution of the golden ratio; so the system does not HAVE To adjust all the other elements of its structure to compensate from growth, as it will remain in the same relative distance/weight to the central singularity. The graph shows that ternary balance of the 3 branching of the spiral.*

In that regard, there is an internal ‘symmetry’ between the T-Algebraic Fibonacci numbers (the series of a growth caused by reproduction, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, etc.) and the ‘geometric ratio’ the phi number. And here we observe also the ‘quality’ found between the ‘similar’ but not equal mathematical formulations in space (which are exact geometric enclosures) and time (which are fluctuations around a ±1 value, as it happens also in √2 or pi, and it is the ‘ultimate’ meaning of irrationality in time-sequences of numbers vs. continuity in geometric forms on a *single space-time SIMULTANEOUS scale:*

In the graph we can see how this duality unfold for phi and √2: in geometric analysis it is always possible by means of a single trick of division and reorganisation to break a square into two equal squares of smaller size. When we do so arithmetically with numbers however we shall always approximate the series by ±1 ‘infinitesimal part’ more or less. So happens in the phi line approached above or below.

What this ultimately means is that *a time series is a sequence which does have a beginning and an end, in an above or lower scale of the ∆-dimension, in which the last entropic death moment or the first seed on the lower scale IS not in the same plane and has NOT to be included. **So we say that:*

*‘Time sequences are open at the beginning and the end as the seed and death happens into another ∆-dimension. Space structures are closed in a single ∆-scale, where the enclosure is possible’.*

It remains to notice that *all those games of reality worth to study occur in the 1, 2, 3, natural structure of the ternary Universe. So happens to all series, which are defined as ternary series (time being always ternary) as opposed to phi which is essential a spatial ratio (pure space being essentially one-dimensional as in the fingers ratio, or at best bidimensional space-time as in the screen of information)*

Next comes of course, 5, which is intimately connected to the Fibonnaci series, and the golden ratio, as it is *the natural number for ∆-fifth dimensional self-similar growth inwards into the lower scales of maximal information, which implies we find the ratio also in fractal structures such as those of the Mandelbrot set.*

This pentagonal inner growth, is also *represented algebraically given the duality of each of those constants as observed in space (golden ratio) and in time (Fibonacci open solution as a series of **numbers). Thus we get the pentagonal equation that defines the golden ratio.*

*Yet ultimately we can reduce those ratios to the 3 fundamental geometric figures based in relative S/T bidimensions which when not completely regular, show the ratio as its fundamental s/t relationship, giving birth to the golden rectangle (ST), triangle (S) and circular angle (Tiƒ), which as we know already ARE the canonical 3 bidimensional figures of Spe (Δ) <ST (◊) > Tiƒ (Ο) components. Thus, we find the golden angle in most systems, with self-centred elements from where it departs the growth and latter informative control of the system. So it is canonical with slight variations in molecules with self-centred atoms. The rectangle is canonical for bidimensional sheets of information. And the triangle for ‘frontal’ lineal locomotion ‘spear heads’; where the ‘informative rectangle’ transforms the larger arm’ into an entropic perpendicular penetrating line-point.*

**∏**

Pi is the number of the 3rd age and any Spe<=>Tiƒ transformations back and forth, which can be classified in 3 degrees of entropy, the cycle with its pi radius, the sinusoidal function, with regular curved forms (ST) and the more entropic, seemingly disorder geodesic on curved space, as the case of a river in flat lands, meandering for a value of: π-length=|-distance. So we shall find pi in all S>T Transformations and geodesic flows and transmissions of energy and information through hyperbolic iterative waves.

Less understood is the next degree of complexity of GST Number theory, which is the relationships between all those constants, which is new ground I will leave here for future researchers. Consider indeed just 3 questions and muse why they are so. 2 new, hardly researched:

π²±√2/10=10 Why? And the related result:

πˆ√2=5

Then a well-known result:

If we ad all the squares of reciprocal finitesimals: ∑1/n²=π²/6

It is the simplest Euler’s function z(n)=∑1/nˆn

In general those reciprocal series, being a reciprocal the fundamental finitesimal part of a form of n vertex points within an imperfect circle (trivial) are closely related to π. What makes them specially interesting is the fact they are *decreasing sequential series on the ∆-scalar dimension and so combine ∆πe concepts together.*

But why is so important and what is its relationship to GST? This is the first of my 10 ‘Millennium problems’, which of course involves the resolution of the Riemann conjeture, found elsewhere on those texts, as you can find a proof of Fermat’s theorem that fits in a margin and many other curiosities for those who consider trivia and details more important than the thoughts of God (almost all humans, given the indifference to this blog – something that finally no longer bothers me.)

In any case, this section will be further expanded on GST number theory (∞|º).

Let us then complete our analysis of those mathematical constants all together now.

**THE WORLDCYCLE AS MANIFESTATION OF THE MAIN NUMBERS & CONSTANTS of age: i, 0, √2, φ, e, π, 1**

For what we have studied more exhaustively for the golden ratio it is easy to deduce that we should be able to construct both in space as a super organism and in time as a world cycle in abstract (without emphasis on ∆±1 organic structures and ∆º sensorial survival instincts; which are *parallel properties of the ∆º**st universe not expressed in the language of mathematics, one of the many languages systems of reality). So we shall introduce the meaning of all those symbols in the world cycle series:*

Indeed, a world cycle thus have some key elements defined by its general equation, the moment of seed in a lower ∆-1 scale or ‘finitesimal birth’, 1/n≈0, the moment of emergence as a whole, or ‘1’, which can also be considered the 0-∞ points, in the larger scale, and the standing points of the 3 ages of time, related to the √2, e¤ and π. We shall study this general program of number theory.

Here we shall consider only some preliminaries of the concept.

**e & π ****The world cycle as expression of a few Universal ratios of Spe/ST/tiƒ actions. **

The FUNDAMENTAL TO THE LOGIC-MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURE OF THE world cycle, we shall describe it in the simplest games of mathematical and physical constants, which determine the standing point of the world cycle, being √2, e and π the constants of the 3 ages and its multiple manifestations from algebraic equations, such as the world cycle description in limits and domain:

as well as the exponential reproductive growth of the 2nd age, to its final warping in -π cycles of increasing information, which will finally explode into its chaotic end.

now the question is to know first and all how i the seed of existence, pi its cycles of life and death and e its exponential growth as it emerges between planes order in a worldcycle, and the answer is immediate, they play in the complex plane as the positive and negative roots of the emerging seed are better represented in that space.

Now the world we live in is ultimately selected from possible mathematical systems in which the values of pi, e and √2 are different from those of this world. As it is, there are variations within our world of those values. i.e. in relativity the ‘curvature’ of space-time will determine different pis. The hexagonal world with pi as a 3 value (ratio of the hexagon perimeter to its diameter) is one of such worlds, in which ‘spheres’ have a limit of polygonal form, 6. As such the bee heave has this structure, the graphene ‘planiland’ world has this structure, the Fuller Dome… and any triangulation in only 6 parts.

So we can talk in fact of many ‘mathematical worlds’ within a single Universe, and pi = 3, 14 etc. as the most perfect, complex potential world of cyclical time structures.

In the same manner we could talk of other different exponential growths from ∆-1 to ∆1, which do not have an e-xponential perfect function, which is the function of maximal growth, as eˆx IS always bigger than xˆe, which merely means that e is the perfect exponential growth number, whose magic properties as those of pi, as an |>O function are the best we can conceive of.

So e is the fastest, most efficient form of an ∆>∆+i event on the 5th dimension and pi, is the most efficient translation from an |>O state, and both together gives us the perfect ‘space-time wave’. Consider for example a classic probability distribution with a Gauss norm creating a bell curve. We can use it to define both in space and time, a wave of populations and define a few of the recurrent symmetries we shall find in all space-time events and symmetry.

If the curve were perfect, the blue top ‘semicircle’ would be a pi semicircle, the orange, exponential function would be an e-function, which will have a tail that should start in the infinitesimal 1/n=∆-1, first quanta that initiates an exponential growth, surfaces into the ∆º scale a e (where the integral of its lower population is 1, the whole) and then starts a second growth till eˆ3=20, when it becomes ∆+1, or in the case of a world cycle, in which the being does not become a new ∆+1 ‘whole’ (the commonest case) the system will go through 3 ages, the exponential growth of youth (orange region), the blue region of maturity with its maximal growth, 100-peak point and then diminish in a symmetric 3rd age to the first.

The graph thus has an infinite number of uses both to map out in time, the worldccle of a being and in space its population of ‘cellular/atomic’ infinitesimals). This specific sample is on an IQ population. Parts of the graph either as a graph of space population or time frequencies, or space-time actions, or exponential growth (only the orange part) or exponential decay, etc. etc. are essential to real physical, biological and social systems, because their underlying cause are the space-time Universal world cycles and super organisms’ ∆-1 cellular/social/atomic structures that create and dissolve wholes:

So the Universe is indeed ultimately a mathematical game of ratios and balances and simultaneous structures of Spe<St>Tiƒ based in the symmetries of space and time, and the scales of ∆-dimensions.

**Poetic license: the homology of all ‘constant world cycles’.**

The simplest expression of a world cycle, Ø, is its constants and ratios of energy and form, cos and sin fluctuations, into fourier transforms of scalar emergence, mediated by the constant fusion of diagonals, √2. Ø thus shows fundamentally the nature in time and space of a space-time present cyclical hyperbolic flow, through its Konstants of detail, species with certain magnificent ratios shown into particular equation, such as the SMH, harmonic motions, lagrangians and Hamilitonians, of energetic explosions and collapses to 0.

0° indeed, 0/0 are all possible functional combinations, whose details become valuable indications of a ratio that survives when the game of tao i-logic thought returns to reality.

Such a simple, iterative Universe, where there are only 2 ‘fundamental events’, a motion in the 5th dimension between scales and a transformation of lineal entropy into cyclical information and vice versa, Einstein was right: the ultimate principles are Universal ratios/constants, which transform one number into another, of which 2 are paramount: the Constant of Pi, which transforms back and forth lineal entropy into temporal information, through sinusoidal hyperbolic waves; and the Constant of Euler, e, which is the constant of growth and diminution through scales of the 5th dimension.

Now in the future, when people do understand how close vital mathematics describes a world cycle through the 3 constants of existence, those standing i, seminal points that creep through the emergent ±1, o interval to fully start its e-xponential growth in the new ∆+1 plane of existence, leaving behind a rce of pi-cycles, in Castalia, that place where all languages of expression of the game of exi=stiences is known, you will hear strange languages of homologic poetry describing ∆ºstravels like this:

YOU START AS AN I-MAGINARY NUMBER, IN THE REGION OF I-LOGIC COORDINATES, THE NEGATIVE SIDE OF THE emergent world cycle, when you are nothing but a seed of √-1, in the ∆-1 region of the coordinates, how well you perform in that imaginary region as you emerge into the e-consciousness of being fully mature and ready to explode in waves of √2, now real no longer foetus creeping through the eternity of ±1, 0 domains.

Alas you explode hyperbolically full of energy and growing form towards the stratosphere, of being 20, e³, the limit of amino-acid forms for the game of existence you perform assenblied into genetic molecules ready to implode and explode and implode and explode… till once more a zero, opening your eyes, beyond 3 to the pi-existence, trembling nothingness into the wor(l)d beyond, static first fractal point of a new go(l)d… open your eyes to the eternal tao-game.

This tells us some things about the world cycle and its form, which turns out to be a distribution of Gauss in maximal detail:

2017 will be dedicated to complete the sections of mathematics and physics at the simplest, most telling level.

Now, the nature of those Universal constants as fundamental to Nature is not clearly understood in its whys. So I used to start my conferences with this little tease. And I ended THEM explaining the 2 fundamental combinations of those constants, the probability distribution of a population in space (Gauss curve) and Euler’s formula for the world cycle (with its simpler mode of Euler’s identity) which mathematicians consider the most beautiful equations of the Universe, and are certainly the commonest, along the ‘lineal motions’ described by Hamiltonians/Lagrangians.

*Yet Euler’s formula in a dynamic way, and Gauss formula, which can be interpreted as the waveform derived of the constant creation of ‘new points’ in the Euler’s cycle, ultimately define a **world cycle of space-time, hence showing in a rather simple profound way how all is about a world cycle of space-time and its synchronous form – a super organism.*

**The main numbers.**

Thus, we stress again that √2, π, e, and φ, the ratios of basic Spe<st>Tiƒ transformations and events; with 3 other numbers for the infinitesimal, the whole and the ‘seed’ of information, (o, 1, i), they complete a ‘basic’ world cycle of any system of the Universe:

- i: seed of information
- 0: finitesimal, point of view
- √2: s x t merge
- π: 3 |spe > O-Tiƒ;
- e: ∇1 e->∆1+∆º
- φ: œ=Tif/ST & ST/Spe & Spe/1 RATIOS of being
- 10: 10 §º ≈ §¹

And so those are the fundamental constants of the game of space-time beings in Nature, which will keep prompting during the world cycle of beings, specially when considering the process of ’emergence’ of the organism in its informative, developmental states.

All this said and not said, let us now move on to the next scale of constants:

**The constants of physics**

Since those metric, Sp x Tƒ = k∆, ARE FUNDAMENTALLY simple, the equations and constants of nature, will be simple ratios, often of the exact same type as the metric equation is. This means that for each ‘interval’ of ∆ and its main ‘ternary’ §-ubdivisions in smaller scales, we shall find such simple equations defining the existence of the being.

It follows that we shall immediately find a set of ternary constants or parameters, for each of those scales that shall correspond to Sp (S-entropy-past), Tƒ (T-Future, frequency) and Kst (present-energy).

This is specially truth in physical systems, as humans disregard all other more complex qualities of them. So we can find for each plane and ternary sub§cale of physics, 3 constants or equations focused on the ∆, S and T components of the being:

**∆energy**: A general, fundamental equation , of the type SxT=k, which *does not change as we move through the ∆§cales of the being*, to define the ‘present ‘bidimensional-energy of the system’ in terms of a product of a constant quanta of space and a growing temporal frequency of ‘social populations’ in space and/or its symmetric frequencies in time, which carry the growth of the being through ∆-scales: E=hv, for the quantum scale; E=knT for the thermodynamic scale, e=mv², for the gravitational scale; and similar formulae for intermediate §-meanningful scales.

Then departing from that present equation we can study the space-entropy and time-frequency component.

In terms of dimensions we are dealing with a 2, or 3 even 4-dimensional concept of ST-present energy for each scale of reality (depending of the detailed mind view and degree of space-time aggregation we study).

In terms of orientation, the Energy component is the present, reproductive storage of the being. Thus it will be a bidimensional plane of width (added along a length component for the total being and in some occasions, in a 4-vector for the whole being both in its space volume and time existence) . For example, for waves we shall measure energy by the square amplitude of the wave. To notice that those variations on the parameters and formulae of present energy, must be often considered choices of the human mind, and the instruments it uses to perceive the being. For example in quantum physics, humans perceive mostly the lineal motion or thrust of the particle onto the instrument, so the angle of form, a Tiƒ component, is not required and in our quantum formulae, the square of the amplitude that gives us the intensity of its energy does NOT require the rotational imaginary angle on those equations, reasons why we multiply/square it with its conjugate: Ψ x Ψ*, as our instruments are rough detectors of such far away scales (a fact that has produced much speculation as what this product is, a probability in time or a density in space, ST-symmetric concept of similar value)

**S-peed**: Regarding the space-component equations a similar simple equation will define its ‘entropic’ motion component. And since we have defined entropy as expansive motion, the best mathematical description will be a one-dimensional lineal vectorial ‘speed’, which we write in terms of *a ratio between the spatial field from where motion is obtained, described as a gradient, potential, tension or attractive force between the 2 points of the motion, and a component that describes the density of form, or information, the system must ‘reproduce’, ‘iterate’ and ‘carry through’ that gradient of tension/force/potential/voltage. *

Again as pure entropy is not observed, we need to measure that speed as a ratio with the information of the being, which is carried and reproduced along the line of length-entropy. So for all scales we find the best way to measure that entropy a parameter of speed, as a ratio of Space & information:

v=s/t (particle speed)≈ s x ƒ (as frequency measures cyclical time-information, the inverse of lineal t-duration: ƒi=1/t) , v=λ ω (wave speed); etc.

Again, humans combine those parameters so we have different combinations of energy and speed formulae, such as flows, intensities, etc.

For example in electric flows, a scale between the thermodynamic and gravitational scales, which measure packs of electronic motion, the key equation is Intensity=Voltage x conductance (flow of electricity); and it combines a speed component and a volume of energy/particles/populations of electrons. Moreover humans prefer to measure it with a more obscure inverse parameter, not the conductance but its inverse, the resistance of the medium to the motion of the flow: R=V(tension-entropic gradient)/I.

While we can find for each type of wave a different parameter for the general formulae, v= S-entropic gradient/ƒ(informative density). So for S, we find the Young modulus of tension, and similar concepts for different waves, divided by the mass density of the wave that moves with different terms.

Special mention deserves the case of the light speed, which is also written in terms of the k-curvature or tension/gradient of the vacuum space over which the light wave travels, and its magnetic density of information.

Yet again here humans use the inverse of k, ε and write the formulae v2≈ k/µ, as 1/ε(s)µ(ƒ). And further on reduce the bidimensional speed plane, c², as one-dimensional c, so they get Maxwell equations of the form c=1/√εµ. And finally as we measure light speed-motions with electrons in its static entangled state of the stop & go, form and motion beat of all systems, the electron IS always in relative entangled stoppage in reference to the emitter of the light wave, and so c-speed always is measured constant between the entangled, electronic emitter and observer of information, locked in the lower ∆-1 neutrino/gravitational scale. Hence we perceive c-speed as constant regardless of the macroscopic ∆+i motion of the observer since the real measure of speed happens in the ∆-2 locked scale which is in relative no motion.

**
Time/informative** parameter. Which lead us to the final time-informative parameter of the system, a measure of frequency that grows in speed and leaves a larger trail of informative populations, or density that becomes storage of energy and also changes from scale to scale (frequency, temperature and curvature vortices for charge and gravitation, k and G, being the most common parameters for those time frequencies). And so we get the classic formulae of physics of the graph, which ultimately are expressions of 5D metric.

**I. ∆•ST CONSTANTS.**

Let us then define those constants, as usual considering its different types:

**S: Topological Constants: e x i |s=t flows**

In the graph, the first type of constants are those defined by geometry and topology, as the different structure of beings have quantitative fixed values and exist with a form and function in balance, mimicking the generator equation and its parts:

**ST: Constants of action: K=s x t.**

In the graph in any exchange of energy and information between two polar particles of time, through a wave that mixes both, there are certain relationships that establish stable, topologically correct changes of curvature and motion, ruled by ‘vital constants’ that measure the fixed content of energy and information, motion and curvature transferred in each exchange.

** **In the graph, the exchange, generally a ratio of energy and information (so the growth of both elements remains co-invariant) or a product (based in the invariance of 5D metric) shows that in fact there is a dynamic exchange between both, expressed with rhythmic simplicity.

**∆ constants.**

Now, what most people care about are the constants of each scale of the Universe as a whole, not of its parts. Those are the huge physical system of constants that inform each huge scale of reality, shown in the left side.

The beauty of 5D metric equations, applied to those constants is shown on those graphs. On the left, we can unify them all conceptually considering that Energy is the st-present parameter product of an Spe-constant and an T-frequency. On the right, we can find the Unification Equation of charges and masses, which we easily obtain in fractal terms, as a galaxy acts as an atom of the ∆±4 dimension.

Finally between scales we will find decametric socia scales, from the structure of human societies from the individual 10ˆ0 to the global society, 10ˆ9, to the magic 10 ˆ10 number between scales, (galaxies in the Universe, atoms in a magnetic domain, ties in a DNA molecule, people on earth’s super organism, etc.)

The main Universal constants of space thus are those of the parameters of 5D metric shown in the left graph:

the constant of action of the quantum world, H, the constant of action of the thermodynamic world, or K and the constant of action of the light-gravitational world or c.

The derivate operations to K = ST which defines a constant of present action, or secondary @ctions of the being will define minor Universal constants, and when those events are exhaustively studied as in physics, the number of such parameters keep growing, but at the end they can be reduced to the simple ‘elements’ that matter in reality, the ternary symmetries, scales, social parameters, and topologies common to all space-time beings. Hence the enormous parallelism we shall find in the mathematical equations applied to each of those scales of reality.

Physical events, densities and speeds, determine ‘fluxes’ of actions-forces that became the parameters of mathematical physics, elaborated with calculus (to calculate wholesale the total ratio for volume of ∆-1 beings). Quantitative science is often the result of dealing with infinitesimals of an ∆-1 scale that become a flux of energy and information transferred within the co-existing 3 scales of a given world-superorganism.

So let us put the key example of physical Universal constants, which *mimic the game of existence of the perfect game of √2, e, π 3 ages of universal constant (young fusion of e and i, perpendicular into a diagonal 2-root; mature age of massive reπroduction, and final cyclical 3rd pi age.* IN THIS CASE WE TALK THE 3 CONSTANTS OF A GAME OF EMERGENCE OF PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, THROUGH 3 CONSTANTS, FROM THE √2 QUANTUM WORLD, THROUGH THE E-LIGHT WAVE, TO THE ∏-GRAVITATIONAL INFORMATIVE COLLAPSE:

**Comparison of constants across scale: metric of Unification. Inverse equations of big-bang deaths.**

We indicate constants of Information as fluxes for which we use a simply intuitive term, S>T, which shows how a larger spatial form becomes a smaller, more informative systems.

Now consider its inverse symbol, T<S, which shows how information dissolves into entropy as in the case of human biological deaths, when our information is erased and our body expands back into cells gaining space.

It is a big-bang equation of the previous ‘constant’ E<c2>M which can go both ‘arrows of time’, the arrow of entropy (M<c2>e) or of information (E<c2>m)

Does this inverse ‘arrow of time’, of pure entropy holds also for physical systems? Of course it does. In fact it is embedded in the most important equation of physics: E<=>M(t) c², which as it happens can go one way or another. And so when Mass explodes into pure entropy-radiation, we are ultimately also observing a specific case of 5D metric.

Which is a good way to introduce how we apply it to physics:

*A sample case of fractal 5D physics: Unification equation of charges and masses.*

And we shall also relate some of those Universal Constants across ∆-scales are based in the isomorphism of all those scales, derived of the metric of the 5th dimension, ∆=Se xTƒ – the most important of which is the isomorphism between the Q-constant of charges and the G-constant of masses, the so-called Unification Equation of Forces.

It is the application of such simple metric equation to the physical systems of the Universe. As we find immediately that we can describe all its physical scales, the atomic, planetary, galactic and big-bang scales, with the same topological forms and 5D metric, giving us a simplex ‘vortex equation’ that unifies both charges and masses as relative ‘accelerated time clocks’ of all those scales – the so long searched for ‘unification equation of charges and masses’, which Einstein failed to discover as mathematics did not come out with a fractal concept of scales till Mandelbrot’s 73 seminal work.

So we can unify them with a single equation once we observe the only difference between its attractive power (hierarchy problem) is the fact that according to 5D metric, charges turn much faster and hence as any fast rotating vortex, attract much more strongly than cosmological masses, whose minimal quanta and force is 10ˆ40 times larger in space and weaker in cyclical speed, which i at ‘logic level’ (in the posts of cosmology at quantitative level) yields:

5D Unification: Atom* Charge vortex: ∆-3≈ Max. Tiƒ x min. Spe ≈ Max. Sp x Min. Tif ≈ ∆+3 Galaxy mass vortex: **w² x r³ = U.C (G,Q) X A.M. (Active magnitude).*

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10ˆ30 kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10ˆ-7 rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ˆ-11 kgˆ-1 mˆ3 rad. secˆ-2

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10ˆ16 rad. secˆ -1 = w (electron);

5.3 × 10ˆ-11 m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10ˆ -27 kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10ˆ39 stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: G(k)M/cˆ2.

But since in that expression M is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.

Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world.

To notice those results, the first theoretical deduction of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three standard forms of proof in science.

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right. Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Of course, this result is obtained using the underlying concepts of Newton->Poisson (gradient of gravitational potential), refined in Einstein’s ‘simultaneous pictures’ of those vortices, to study its relative curvature, *which is the static view of an informative clock of time. So we can observe the similarities of all those concepts: curvature, speed of time, relative fractal scale, vortex attraction & universal constant as a ratio between the ‘curvature=speed in time’ and ‘size-distance’ in space of the system.*

It thus though completely change the way we understand the Universe, its ‘accelerated clocks of time’ of the 2 limiting fractal scales perceived by human beings, the quantum and galactic scale, which turn out to be ∆±3 similar, at least from the human point of view, in the middle ∆o scale between them. And needless to say it will reverberate in all the fields of physics and the metaphysics of the whole, as it makes the Universe not only immortal in time (as motions never stop), in space (as it is symmetric to time) and in scales, as each atom-galaxy starts a new game, but *not necessarily in the number of variations, which are given by the ‘potential’ of creation of a limiting game of ‘only’ 3 varieties of time, or ages, space, or topologies, and scales, or micro-normal-macro sizes for all systems of reality.*

So this simple account of the 5 more important physical constants, G, Q, h, c, k,.

**– S**o those are the Universal constants, in which the external actions of the being will be displayed, which therefore will come constantly in our equations. In physics, as we are thermodynamic ∆-beings sandwiched between the ∆-1 atomic and ∆+1 galactic gravitational world, those essential constants of the larger and smaller world that come in almost all the equations of interaction between thermodynamic man and reality are graphed in the next picture, as functions of Time and space, and its integrals of Energy, AND BELOW in the Universal Units, void of human anthropomorphism (Planck Units):

To fully understand the meaning of physical equations, before its thorough study through its different scales, we must understand the previous equations and its meaning, as they are void of human interference in its measure, and further on, show that instead of the 3 human ‘parameters’, mass, length and time of current physics, all can be studied with the 3 equivalent but not equal parameters of the Universe, G for mass, c for length and h for time.

So this is the first thing the system reveals to us. In the Universe time is cyclical and measured through angular momentum, of which the simplest unit is h; the constant of universal information, in the Universe space is measure with speed (space in motion), whose fundamental unit is c-speed, the constant of universal space. And so it only rest to consider that in the Universe, the 3^{rd} element which is the active magnitude of the scalar 5D being is measured with the relative unit of curvature/force/5D metric value, which in the Universe is G and Ke in the equivalent lower scale of reality, and in the remaining thermodynamic scale, H-Boltzmann, the entropy unit. And this transversal constants of the 5^{th} dimension close therefore the fundamental units of realty from where all others can be derived. (whereas 1/4πeo=Ke is the unit that should be used).

No other constant is fundamental to the Universe, and those are also enough constants to express in 5D physics all what exists, regardless of the specific world (human physics) that observe that Universe.

So the first and obvious truth we observe is the difference between 5D fractal space-time and the human continuous single still space and single time clock of the Universe, and its single scale.

As we have already considered the meaning of h, G and c in certain depth in the 0th and 4^{th} isomorphisms – the actions of physical systems, it is easy now consider a few more details, on the difference between human perceptions and Universal perceptions of the 2 parameters of reality, Tƒ and Sp, Let us be clear, the Planck units, subject to much speculation are REAL. They are the maximal and minimal quanta of different scales of reality, such as a new scale quanta is made of a social gathering of smaller quanta, regarding time clocks that slow down or accelerate in frequency and space units that grow and diminish in size, and its ratios that define the different planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

So as we advance in the III part of this section, studying each scale we will consider in more detail the consequences of this insight – that space has a fundamental constant c, information, h (a quanta of time) or h/2π, a ‘radius’ or bit of the minimal quanta of information, and its combinations into space-time clock-like vortices (M g, Q k), vary with the scale of the 5^{th} dimension we study.

Once the 5 key isomorphisms of Reality are studied in detail, It is left to apply to that generator equation the Universal Constants or ratios between the different ‘parameters’ of that equation, to start resolving the equations of physics; of which the most obvious and important will be the ‘Constants of 5D planes’, finitesimals of each of those scales of three types, Tƒ/Se: informative densities, Se/Tƒ: energy densities and Se=Tƒ, Action constants. They define the 5^{th} dimension in each plane, studied in the next isomorphism. So here we just consider the 4 more important:

Tƒ/Se: Constants of informative density or ‘Curvature constants’: ∆-1: Q-constant of charge attraction≈curvature; ∆+1: G-constant of mass attraction≈curvature; which obviously are the origin, when considering in ‘isolation’ as Tƒ, of the ∆-1: e: constant of charge of the electron and ∆+1: m_{n}: Constant of mass of the electron.

5D metrics= SexTƒ= K, which defines the Constants of action: ∆-1: quantum plane: h-Planck (‘Planckton’)= E x T , which translates 5D metrics to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane and…

∆: Thermodynamic Plane: k-Boltzmann constant (‘Bolt)= E x T, which translates 5D metrics to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane.

And finally Se/Tƒ: Constants of energetic Density or ‘speed constants’: ∆-1: c-speed, constant of motion of the light space plane, which being the Se-constant for the entire Galaxy in which our system exists, it is the only constant of energy-space or ‘rod of measure’ of all the systems of space we perceive.

**The Lagrangian and Hamiltonian: the worldcycle of physical beings.**

For all what has been said, and the definitions of present waves, v= Se x Tƒ, particles, Max. Tƒ/Se and fields, Max. Se/Tƒ, we are coming to understand 3 fundamental definitions of T.Œ for all sciences: the 3 ages of time in terms of the Se and Tƒ parameters:

Max. Se/Tƒ = Young energetic state (∂L=0; +∂’L); Max. Tƒ/Se= Old, future state (∂L=0; -∂’L); Max. Se x Tƒ (Se=Tƒ): (∂L=0; +∂’L=0).

Those 3 points which in the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian expression of ALL equations of physics represent the 3 stationary points of value 0 in the Lagrangian and maximal and minimal or 0 values in the Hamiltonian are the 3 points in which any System of Nature varies along its worldcycle. In physical systems however, the back and forth motion along those 3 points can clear a 0-sum time-loop that repeats itself constantly without the apparent need, at least from the human perspective of 2 Lorentzian regions in which the system breaks down:

In the graph we can see the interpretations of those 3 points, the Field in ∆-1, of Max. Se x Min. Tƒ, the wave of present, of Spe=Tƒ and the particle of future of Max. Tƒ x Min. Spe, with the present wave in the center. I call this graph the Lorentzian-Newtonian-Kelvinian (ab. LNK) graph as it represents in our Universe the 3 natural limits of existence of forms in the 4D present pace-time described by special relativity, the region of max. entropy when particles accelerate towards c-speed dying away, the region of present balance, or liquid/wave states an the regions of maximal information closer to Tƒ perfect vortex super fluidity and 0 degrees.

The 3 regions thus establish also a clear difference in the regions in which information grows, towards a higher ‘plane of existence’, in which the particle reaches its maximal form (collapse of waves into particles, when coming closer to the ∆+1 œ, such as when photons collide with electrons or electrons collide with atoms or atoms with molecules and so on.

The graph thus explains many elements of physics. It is ultimately a graph that represents and explains the power of the Lagrangian-Hamiltonian formalism that localizes those 3 ‘canonical solutions’ to physical systems and planes of existence, where the field quanta, the wave state and the Entropy element appear. Now in physical terms the wave will be defined by a wave equation:

Present = Se x Tƒ = S/T=V in lineal time notation or wavelength x frequency = Speed

The particle will be on the other hand defined by the density of information, Tƒ/Se = K, which is a fundamental parameter in all scales of reality; and we shall observe immediately that relates to the constants of curvature, G and Q in the equations of force : G, Q ( e x e or m x m /d^{2})

And the field will be defined by the density of energy Se/Tƒ = K, Se x Tƒ = K , E x T = K, which are the constant of actions of the two main fields of quantum physics (H=E x T) and Thermodynamics K = E x T.

Thus we resolve here the meaning of those Universal constants, beyond the ‘Germanic, idealist’ definition.

In that regard we can establish as the fundamental parameters of the Human World, the constants of energy density of the quantum and thermodynamic fields, H and q, the constants of informative curvature/density, Q and G, and the constants of Present Speed, C.

Now those are the constants of the Human word, which is NOT the whole Universe. This must be clear. And certainly while in the previous article on cosmological systems we have studied further beyond the Human Universe the dark world, there is no reason why to do so in this post on the atomic and molecular matter sales of human beings.

It should be noticed that there is ONLY a constant of speed-space, c the constant of light because WE are created in a pyramid in which the minimal continuum is light space-time, from where the symmetry breaks, that is quanta evolve socially into larger systems.

Of course we do know that in the interior of atoms there are quarks and outside galaxies dark energy and dark matter, but those themes have dealt with ion the previous post, because in the ‘known known evident Universe they DO NOT PLAY ANY ROLE, they are beyond the human Universe. We are a Universe in which those are the constant that matter. Strong forces and dark energies, which are related as a Russian Doll game, in which smaller parts and larger beings come together, as it happens with smaller food and larger animals in the world (where the smallest quanta, light feeds plants, the smallest plancktons whales, the smallest krills, whale sharks, and so according to the metric of the 5^{th} dimension Min. Tƒ (food ) x Max. Se (predator) = K, in this game of nested Russian dolls from below and above, our world is reduced to:

Constant of Energy density in the Light scale: H-Planck

_____________

Constant of Present speed-distance: Light space-time (relativity theory)

Constant of Information density in the light scale: Q

To: time clock: e-charge

Constant of energy density in the matter, thermodynamic scale k-Bolt

_____________

Constant of information density in the matter, thermodynamic scale G

To: time clock: T-mass (the mass of the top quark, which however is outside our Universe).

Again it is important to notice the scalar nature of the Universe, as the two limits of our perception while influencing our world, are NOT in our world, that is the H-Planck, the uncertain limit in the below scale and the top quark, the dark matter in the above scale, since systems do have a symmetry that adapts them on the 3 levels such as:

|-1>Oo…

That is, the H-Planck as a Planckton, as a To of the lower ‘neutrino scale’ is NOT visible to us, it is the uncertain limit, but we can perceive it as an |-1 quanta of energy of the electron scale where perception starts, as the To time clock of our Universe. It does appear in our equations despite being the constant of action we do not distinguish ‘alone’. On the other limit, the clock of mass, the top quark with its faster speed of time, is neither perceived, nor its boson of dark energy, the H-fields and particle. But we can perceive its influence in the Mach’s rotary inertia of the galaxy and its left-chirality, transmitted to our particles (which die as anti-particles with right chirality).

Thus the certain human word is reduced to a few parameters:

c-speed the constant of spacetime speed

e-charge, the constant of time

k Bolt the constant of energy density

And Q the constant of information density:

**ST (c ) <E (k: S/T) x I (Q: T/S) >ðƒ (e ^{–})**

In the graph, the key equation that started quantum physics in which most of the constants of our world appear. It is the equation of radiation of a black body.

This is the ‘Constant World’ In which we live, exist, and perceive, which is ultimately made of light spatial entropy and electronic Temporal Form in which our present actions of energy and information are regulated by Thermodynamic temperature.

It is encased in a larger world of strong forces and gravitational forces, which however hardly affects us; and beyond it into the Dark world of Top quark, its superluminal hyper-forces, and its superluminal Higgs fields and bosons, which we can now theoretically by isomorphisms but it is totaling alien to us unless we bring it here in our accelerators to devour and destroy our world.

Of all those elements and parameters of the standard model and classic physics, the only element which I have not yet fully inserted due to some contradictor properties, namely its spin, which makes it seem a fermion when its speed would make it seem a boson is the neutrino, of which we will speak in due term. It seems that its most clear role is to be a partner or half ‘component’ of light, forming together a space-time broken symmetry as the electro-weak force also forms a space-time broken symmetry, themes those to explore fully on the 4^{th} line.

**Breaking of symmetry: universal constants as limits of the existence of physical systems.**

Universal constants are vital constants of a larger scale of existence of a physical system, while its scalar constants are the active magnitude,

often the value of the specific Metric of the being, its most important value: ∆=Sp x T

Once this is understood and the space-time main events and systems of physics are described we can consider the next phase of T.Œ, which is specially relevant in a mathematical science as physics, hence we shall mention it so early in the introduction: the study of the 7 fundamental Universal/vital constants of al systems of the Universe:

- The Sp/Tƒ ratio energy density of the system.
- Its inverse, Tƒ/Sp information density.
- The Sp=Tƒ, balance that maximizes its existential ‘momentum (Sp x Tƒ).

They are the internal space-time parameters of the being.

Then there are the external constants that related the whole being, Œ, Active Magnitude, ÅC, to the external world also made of 3 ∆+1 Sp- field of energy, Tƒ-world of informative cycles and ST- parallel elements with whom it communicates. So we find the following ratios:

ÅC/Sp World Field, which provides energy to the being.

ÅC/ST World Body-wave, which provides reproductive actions to the being.

ÅC/Tƒ World Informative field, which provides information to the being.

Whereas ÅC is the parameter, which humans use to classify each variation as a whole with a constant (mass for particles, charge for fields, IQ for human brains, etc.)

Thus in physics the key to harmonize TŒ and classic studies and equations will be to to consider the Universal Constants or ratios between the different ‘parameters’ of its generator equation, to start resolving the equations of physics; of which the most obvious and important will be the ‘Constants of 5D planes’, finitesimals of each of those scales of three types, Tƒ/Sp: informative densities, Sp/Tƒ: energy densities and Sp=Tƒ, Action constants. They define the 5^{th} dimension in each plane, studied in the next isomorphism. So here we just consider the 4 more important:

Tƒ/Sp: Constants of informative density or ‘Curvature constants’: Λ-1: Q-constant of charge attraction≈curvature; Λ+1: G-constant of mass attraction≈curvature; which obviously are the origin, when considering in ‘isolation’ as Tƒ, of theΛ-1: e: constant of charge of the electron and Λ+1: m_{n}: Constant of mass of the electron.

5D metric= SexTi= K, which defines the Constants of action: Λ-1: quantum plane: h-Planck (‘Planckton’)= E x T , which translates 5D metric to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane and…

Λ: Thermodynamic Plane: k-Boltzmann constant (‘Bolt’)= E x T, which translates 5D metric to the Electromagnetic & Atomic Plane.

And finally Sp/Tƒ: Constants of energetic Density or ‘speed constants’:

Λ-1: c-speed, constant of motion of the light space plane, which being the Sp-constant for the entire Galaxy in which our system exists, it is the only constant of energy-space or ‘rod of measure’ of all the systems of space we perceive.

Now the reader should observe nothing else is needed really to describe physical systems isomorphic to all other descriptions of reality, as this still taken from Britannica’s article on Universal constants show:

Those are the fundamental constants because they define the 3 ‘stationary points’ of the world cycle of all physical systems, which the Hamiltonian-Lagrangian equations translate mathematically (Britannica ads the Faraday constant related to charge, I presume because of nationalist memes 🙂

Now what is really the world we live in? The answer is that we are sandwiched between the cosmological dark world and the invisible world below light, the space-time we ‘see’. Thus of all those constants really the ones that matter are:

** The splitting of symmetries and universal constants in physics. ****The conservation of ST-presents.**

The conservation laws of the Universe can be resumed in the conservation of the total Sp<ST>Tƒ reality and its ternary symmetries across space, time and the 5th dimension. So angular and lineal, Sp and Tƒ momentum is conserved, and its larger, 5D vision as integrated planes of systems or energy and information (kinetic and potential energy) is conserved. And the number of particles and antiparticles, or life and death states of a world cycle is conserved. Yet because Sp and Tƒ are relative past and future arrows merged into ST-waves-bodies of present, which constantly iterate its forms, actually all reduces to the conservation of ST dual fields. Present Fields. We do exist always in present.

Thus all starts with a simple philosophical statement: *‘The Universe exists constantly in present’.*

This seemingly simple statement, is a powerful instrument as soon as we realise that the present, ST, is a bidimensional system with a parameter of a dimension of relative space-frm and time-motion, or O-x |=Ø, that is an event which is creative.

The study of the Function of present, Spast, x Tƒuture = Ø-Present, a Constant of existence, which ‘exists’ in one of the scales of the 10th dimension ‘alone at a time’, and the study of other ‘simplex dimensional conservations in any ∆-Plane of the energy and information, Sp and Tƒ, quanta and infinite continuum vibration in space of two poles, which brome a harmonic oscillator creative event:

Sp = ∞ x O = Time point -> Constant of existence which fluctuates through its differential equations from a lineal function ∂y to a full cyclical function, Dy/dx, in any of the two possible upwards and downward social dimensions of affine or topological spas.

Thus a constant of existence, Sp x Tƒ = E∆i, can be also perceived as a sum of quanta of space, of discrete volume dimensions which are seen as fixed and a seemingly continuous due to its extreme range f harmonic oscillator functions between 2 poles.

The line then becomes the true ‘minimal entity of the Universe’, and as such, since lines have breath soon become waves of points, extended also transversally till finally are organised in a different type of vibration, that of a plane.

Which has by definition, *one more dimension and so has points of view, called particles, with a larger gravitational mind of dimensions that the simpler, thermodynamic and electromagnetic, j, µ and h quanta.*

So we could say that the mind is gravitational because of the way we perceives geometry operate with eyes, etc. and so it is cold because it makes a reduction of thermodynamic form – hence its gravitational in the scale it measures.

What are the quanta of gravitation? The only known candidate is the neutrino hence, IT IS the neutrino. How to adapt the equations of present mathematical physics is through the Jordan theory of neutrino light in which particles, first exchange along the invisible side of the c, m, t barriers, a measure line, invisible but that we know it is there to form the first informative neutrino-giravtational connections.

So we are gravitational beings.

We become then frames of references of mechanics in the equation of the mind which is the equation that truly defines as the relative constant of existence, c-speed or 0 temperature or H-planck.

The Universe is immortal in 0-sum time cycles that never end, perfectly anti(symmetric) between the two directions/forms/motions on the extreme of those two cycles, which converge into present, static forms and its infinite-simal up and down in the 5^{th} dimension. And having that on mind we can describe it all.

The main of those laws is the immortality of the Universe, and its dualist formal motions, which are a zero-sum when we put together its antisymmetries of space-time, which conserve together its potential vs. kinetic energy, angular vs. lineal momentum, time vs. space anti-symmetries, across 3 ∆±1 planes of the 5^{th} dimension.

This is the ‘essence’ of it we must grasp. The immortality of the whole is based in the inverse symmetry of its 2 elements: form vs. motion, left vs. right, expansion vs. implosion; lineal, decelerating, expansive stillness vs. accelerating implosive cyclical motion; faster than c speed vs. slower than c speed, positive charge vs. negative charge, particle vs. antiparticle… Positive vs. negative wave sides. opposite genders, a ‘male’ or ‘female’ element, which are complementary and fusion in a reproductive present or divide in two opposite fractions.

Thus 5D Physics explains in a much more natural manner what many physicists came to call the group theory disease; that is, the use of the abstract jargons of modern mathematics, without understanding what they truly mean, and what is ‘truth’ and what is mere mathematics, provoking the present inflation of ‘Group transformations and Symmetries’.

Reality is rather simple, and the proper jargon slightly different. There is not a breaking of symmetry as physicists express it but rather the creation of a symmetry of opposite elements, departing from a universal constant, of Present State, Sp=Tƒ, an immortal point of balance in any plane of reality, which diverges both sides, to one side of MORE INFORMATION, Max. Tƒ and a side of larger spatial energy, as that is the ONLY ternary elements of 5D space-time that might ‘’diverge or converge’ in any scale.

In brief, the 3 ‘standing points’ of the e ages of a Worldcycle in time or ternary symmetry in space or ∆±1 scales of the 5^{th} dimension might diverse from present to relative past and future, lineal and cyclical, higher or lower scales and that gives birth to diversity. So we shall first consider in the domain around our local scale, space and time parameters-constants, how those divergences might happen.

So zero systems expand into the negative (past-Sp in our conventional choice) and positive (future, Tƒ in our choice) relative sides of a constant of symmetry, Sp=Tƒ, which is expressed by giving birth to two cancelling opposites.

*Coincidentia Oppositorum, said* Nicola da Cusa, the infinitely large and slow, the infinitely small and fast, the 0 and the ∞ which are relative and multiplied give us a constant ‘o’ for adding operations or 1 for multiplicative inversions, or a Universal constant for logarithmic scales of the 5^{th} dimension (log vs. e, ln vs. 10, log2 vs. 2 vs. √2 being the most important of those inversions).

Let us recall from this or other posts, what those 3 Sp, Tƒ, and Sp=Tƒ, standing points and constants are in our world:

__Sp=Tƒ: constants of present action on 3 scales.__

– C: the space-time fundamental constant of the galaxy, or present wave of energy and information, in the ∆+1 scale, k or Boltzmann constant in the thermodynamic scale and H or Planck constant in the quantum scale.

__Max. Sp & Max. Tƒ: Young-energetic and old Informative, antisymmetries on 3 scales.__

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call lineal and cyclical momentum, and its integral sum, kinetic and potential energy, in the ∆+1 scale of cosmic bodies.

– Lineal vs. Cyclical formal motions, which we call, negative and positive ‘charge’ in the quantum scale.

– And finally lineal vs. cyclical order in the thermodynamic scale which we consider to have a constant called 0-Kelvin temperature.

It is that reality which must tilt one or the other side of the constant to create the worlds and anti-worlds, light and dark worlds of our Universes and Anti-Universes.

In other worlds the Universe which conserves, Sp, Tƒ, Sp=Tƒ, and ∆±1 elements, the 3 scales and its cyclical and lineal momentums must in its origin be made of both, in its Sp=Tƒ original symmetries and this is the first being or constant of action, a particle, with lineal momentum, a wave, with c-speed a plane of space with angular momentum or spin.

We can in that sense define several possible births of Universes, but to be strict, we just will consider the quasar Universe of our light space-time galaxy, which is the only one we have enough information to fully understand.

In such Universe we do know there is a space-time, which is light space-time. So we can consider it spit above or below a certain dividing constant Sp x Tƒ, speed, ‘c’.

We know that the island galaxy, in which we are as masses and particles, have a c-speed barrier, we cannot cross. And we know

outside our Galaxy there is a whole world of dark space and dark energy, we do NOT see. So it is not made of c-speed light. So the origin of our reality ‘before we were born must be a split that left on our side the < c speed and outside of our galaxy there must be a >c speed. This is the world of dark energy, which seems to expand *because* seeing as distance, faster than c-speed appears as expansive, entropic space.

This is not forbidden in Einstein’s equations, merely means a negative sign in the mass and energy of the system, which can only be crossed, when a ‘being’ suffers the antisymmetry of moving from the side of more to-order into the side of more se-entropy, in the action of death.

Now, for a system to be > C speed it must have a space which is scalar, and with 0 spin, outside. So what particle outside can be > c and 0 scalar angular momentum?

As always we do NOT speculate (and that is why we have reduced our analysis to our galaxy). There is actually a boson, the Higgs boson that has 0 spin and negative mass in certain ranges of excited existence. So here we have the dark energy boson, the Higgs, outside the Universe, accelerating beyond c-speed, which therefore is the ‘event horizon’ or halo of the galaxy, which cannot be crossed in the larger scale of the anti-atom galaxy.

So the fundamental symmetry of the cosmological ∆+1 scale is >c (Higgs boson), ≈ c (Photon) < c (Mass) is resolved.

Next there is the question moves to the ∆-thermodynamic scale.

Again, we must consider here the constant of order, which we found to be 0 K Temperature. So there should be a world to one side of 0 temperature and a world to the other side of 0 temperature.

And since we find that our world CANNOT go under 0 temperature, we are in the side of > 0 Temperature and < C speed. This is evident. And so we must conclude that the dark world outside the galaxy must be below the 0 temperature barrier, which cannot be crossed either. Do we find then anything that is in the dark world below 0 temperature.

Indeed, black holes of large size have a perfect order and are 0 temperature. Their world starts in a accelerated vortex of gravitation, from where ‘light cannot speak’ because light actually turns at c-speed in its event horizon, but because vortices are accelerated (Principle of Equivalence between acceleration and gravity), beyond its 0-barrier black holes MUST move faster than light with less than zero temperature.

And so those are the fundamental barriers between the galactic world in space (< c-speed) and time (>0 k ) and the dark world of dark matter (black hole matter) and dark energy (expansive, > c speed).

In the graph, the pseudo sphere is used to represent Kerr black holes on its central, faster than light axis, which transforms ‘time cycles’ beyond c-speed into spatial dark energy shut through its tachyon jet-axis into the dark world outside galaxies. This spinning process of accelerating and expelling waves and fields of information and energy absorbed through the bidimensional plane-mouth, is natural to all fractal points of the Universe in any scale of reality.

The pseudo sphere however has 2 jets, one that emits the Sp field of the system its absorbs and kills and one that emits its Tƒ particles, the red and blue shift sides of the black hole or star jet.

Both are the sides of a ‘broken dead-symmetry’ when a physical species, Sp<ST≥Tƒ dies, as all systems, it does so because its ‘fields, waves and particles’ dissociate, loosing the synchronicity of its internal clocks (De Broglie’ s wave-particle analyzed that synchronicity in its masterpiece paper, today often forgotten on the forest of mathematical trees). All systems then break as the time vortex accelerates and the field lines decelerate in inverse versions. Thus all symmetry-split of a Universe constant of action or wave can be seen also as a death process of the physical system, and its now unconnected parts.

It is the duality of symbiotic creation big-bang destruction, clearly shown in the particle-antiparticle ± charge fields vs. the proton-electron, ± symbiotic union. The same graph can represent the potential inverse symmetry wells of those positive and negative charges:

Another way to represent those two sides of a symmetry is the concept of a potential well:

A **potential well** is the region surrounding a local minimum of potential energy. Energy captured in a potential well is unable to convert to another type of energy (kinetic energy in the case of a gravitational potential well) because it is captured in the local minimum of a potential well.

The potential well will then be the ‘symmetry point’ or ‘Universal constant’, the c-speed of zero mass-energy; the place in which pure motion and pure form will reside eternally; which once broken will distend into the negative and positive ‘death’ maximals and minimals, extremal points.

The potential well becomes then as the ‘death process’ splits its parameters into a potential barrier, which the system will NOT be able to cross unless it returns to its present-wave form (quantum barrier crossed in the wave state when the extremal past x future field-article system returns to the wave state):

In the graph, the quantum barrier can only be crossed in wave state. The understanding on T.Œ of those phenomena requires to fully grasp the ‘changes in time speed’ which all systems can perform within the limits of its constants of action: as we can accelerate our actions, increasing the tempo of our heart clock, which in turns do change our perception of time, systems can change its E x T = H quantum of action accelerating its time clocks or decelerating them, and can change its ‘states’ from body-actions (wave-state) to head-actions (particle state).

After crossing as wave in the lower ∆-1 plane of the 5^{th} dimension, the system though shows a lower energy-frequency, which it has spent going ‘under’ the well, in the ∆-1 dimension not above, jumping over the Height dimension of growth of form (which we observe in boson states of eusocial evolution that pile up frequencies of bidimensional spin 1).

Those are essential beats of absolute freedom and zero-viscosity, which all systems of the Universe can perform, in its vital state. The risks of those changes of state happen when the ‘change’ moves towards the ‘LNK’ limits of the physical function (Max. Sp=c-speed > stable>Max. Tƒ-form= 0 k), where the split an cause the death of the system:

We can understand those processes thus also in terms of ‘translation’ and travel through the 5^{th} dimension, ∆-particle < ∆-1: wave, faster state: motion > Particle-still form.

Let us then consider briefly the meaning of momentum and energy and its conservation laws which ultimately mean the conservation of the 5^{th} dimension.

**The 3 conservation laws: Energy ≈ 5 ^{th} dimension; lineal momentum: open space; angular momentum: closed time.**

PHYSICS, when trying to find the laws of conservation of the Universe they found 2 laws, the law of conservation of angular momentum, which is a cyclical motion, self-centered into a point; and a lineal motion.

The conservation of momentum is associated in quantum mechanics with the proposition that it makes no difference where you do the experiment, the results will always be the same. As independence in space has to do with the conservation of momentum, independence of time has to do with the conservation of energy.

And so we must deduce that there is NOT absolute space, as the location in space is completely independent on the result of an experiment. So all space is self-contained to the event of space-time and region affected by the experiment.

Then there is the conservation of time. If we turn our ‘experimental apparatus’ in a ‘time-like cycle’, this too makes no difference, and so the invariance of the world to angular orientation is related to the conservation of angular momentum; which means all worldcycles of time have a total zero-value, as they close into themselves in the same point.

So we found that the Universe conserves cyclical motions of time and lineal motions of space.

Then there is the conservation of Energy, which is roughly speaking the ‘integral sum of lineal and cyclical momentums’.

In quantum mechanics it turns out that the conservation of energy is very closely related to another important property of the world, things do not depend on the absolute time.

We can set up an experiment at a given moment and try it out, and then do the same experiment at a later moment, and it will behave in exactly the same way. From this we can deduce the principle of conservation of energy. It is a rather subtle and interesting thing, which can only have an explanation:

Absolute Time, duration, which integrates a series of lineal and cyclical motions, adding them to the extent of creating a new scale of the fifth dimension, IS FRACTAL. It does not exist as a continuous lineal infinite time in a single continuous space plane.

As such absolute time does not affect any event happening in time, which therefore is a self-contained process, a cycle related to the internal time of the event.

A Time cycle is therefore a closed, fractal cyclical proposition.

But we can add, integrate time cycles and that creates the illusion of absolute duration; and we can integrate space surfaces and that creates the illusion of absolute extension.

This is what Leibniz called relational space and relational time.

Leibniz would have said that ‘all substances are made of cyclical motions with different speeds = different clocks of time.’ And different vital spaces, fractal parts. And all together create the illusion of absolute space and absolute time.

But we can ad a third element, the ‘Integral of spaces and times’, which give us the concept of Energy, similar to that of a 5^{th} dimension integral. So on the regions of reality where we can conserve Energy, we are observing a process of scalar, social growth of elements of the 5^{th} dimension. And this gives us the fundamental equations for each scale of physical systems, which are the equations of energy for each of those scales:

E_{∆-1}=hƒ for the quantum ∆-1 scale, Eo= RT for the scale of thermodynamics, and E_{∆1}=1/2 mv^{2} with the limit E=mc^{2} for the gravitational scale.

Whereas as we can observe, a given Plane of the 5^{th} dimension conserves a ‘constant of bidimensional space’ (h, k, m) and a different speed of time cycles, (ƒ, T, v).

We can study then the interaction of those 3 elements, how they transform into each other through the ‘frontiers’ between those 3 scales, and what it means the different combinations of those formula, specifically the one that defines each constant:

H = E x T, R (or n k) = E / T and m = E/c^{2}

In this form they represent the constant of action of energy and Time of each of the 3 scales akin to the co-invariant law of the 5th dimension. It simply means that in each scale of the 5^{th} dimension there is a certain constant ‘rod of measure of space and time that varies (never mind here that we, humans use for certain measures of time, the frequency, and for others the period: T=1/ƒ).

The enormous field open by the study of the 3 scales of the Universe, its constants of space-time, its time frequency clocks and its 5 Dimensional growth in social scales of energy, is a huge field, which we cannot ‘attack’ in this post further.

**Clarifications on conservation quantities, states and magnitudes.**

The previous example shows the problems of translating all those terminologies to T.Œ are due to the use of very different jargons and parameters for each scale. We have introduced the simplest translations of the ∆-1 into the ∆+1 scales in the previous post (Unification equation of charges and masses). Yet it will be easier to use in this introductory level the common jargons of those sciences, merely identifying the previous space, time 5D symmetries and its constant of actions and 5 space-time cycles for each species of each scale.

Needless to say within the previous isomorphisms, we can fit all the disciplines of physical sciences; whose exhaustive analysis of all the actions, species, space-time symmetries (equations) and events in time, between the n-1 scale (quantum physics, electrodynamics, magnetism) and the n-scale (thermodynamics, state physics, electricity) makes physics & chemistry, when NOT trying to make metaphysics (cosmological, eschatological and philosophical statements), the most thoroughly investigated science today.

We will follow the isomorphic method, studying those 2 scales not with the usual procedure of physical and chemical sciences, which define the events of those actions and its structure in space and time with mathematical equations, but with the procedure of T.Œ, considering the 1) 5D scales, 2) space and 3) time symmetries first, its elements and finally its 4) actions, *introducing within that scheme the definitions of the parameters, constants, magnitudes, dimensions and equations of mathematical physics.*

Now, unlike more evident ‘scales’ in which form dominates motion (Evolution) or thought (memes) dominates from and motion (sociology), closer to the human experience, the world of physical systems, is the most remote to that experience, and its language (mathematics) the less known to humans, which move on the natural languages of human thought (visual art, verbal time, emotional bondages), and understand as animals, the survival, topological forms of life. For that reason we would need a basic introduction to the interplay of this wider reality expressed in abstract terminologies that seem so remote from the bio-sociological experience.

They are not. As all beings are knots of space-time cyclical actions, whose purpose is survival. The program of the Universe is hidden on physical systems by the remoteness of its scales, the abstraction of its description and the immensity of its elements. So we shall do an introduction to the interplay and co-existence of the 3 scales of reality, the electromagnetic scale, the thermodynamic and the gravitational scale. We exclude though the limits beyond those scales, the quarks inside the atoms and the galaxy beyond the planet, because they do not truly interact in this world of human existence.

The 5th dimension has barriers between planes of existence, where energy and information don’t cross, due to entropy and asymmetry (chirality); and essentially our world is one of light, electrons, atoms, molecules and matter states.

The similarities between the internal ‘strong forces’ of the atom and the internal gravitational forces of the galaxy, the external electromagnetic forces of the atom, and the external dark energy of the cosmos are studied also with physical laws, but will not be included here.

A question also of difficult analysis is the 3 units of action, of those 3 scales, the angular momentum of h-Planck actions, the vibrational temperature of thermodynamics, and the variable g-forces of gravitation. Those constant of actions seem truly different in its form and equations but the concept of integrative ‘energy’, will allow us to explain how energy and information transfers among those planes.

Finally the order of exposition will be a diachronic analysis, which works better, as the human mind seems to be structure in this manner. So I have abandoned my personal files, which are always written with an analogical, metaphoric method jumping synchronically between all systems of all scales, in spatial order.

Thus we shall analyze in the order in which humans discovered those scales, starting from the science of Mechanics, or higher gravitational scale (XVII and XVIII c.) then the science of Thermodynamics, or human scale (XVIII-XIX c.) and finally the science of electromagnetism and its minimal units (quantum scale).

We will in each scale introduce the spatial and temporal order of the 3 time-space elements of the generator equation (Se<ST>Tƒ), intersecting laws and cases of classic physics, but given the difficulty to understand directly those elements (unlike in biological and sociological forms), introduce a somewhat intermediate exposition but directly ‘downloading’ and interpreting the known-known laws of those systems. Hence the sub-posts entitled ‘mechanics’, ‘Newtonian laws, ‘Maxwell equations’, ‘quantum numbers’, ‘Conservation Laws’ etc. In an ideal world in which T.Œ is the Unification theory of all sciences, those terms would not be used, but at this stage we must translate those well-known laws to the elements of T.Œ.

Now all this SIMPLE REALITY is GREATLY complicated in physics by the multiple jargons, lack of TOE, denial of non quantitative properties and multiplicity of mathematical formalisms for all of those elements of T.Œ, for example, the concept of mass, which we simply as gravitational vortices, has the formalism of Higgs, particle with its negative masses, ad hoc additions, but essentially right; as it is a top quark (in the similar Technicolor more correct formulation) field of dark energy and faster than c-rotational speed, beyond the even horizon of the accelerated black hole vortices.

There is however an even more interesting formulation that general relativity, the Higgs field and Technicolor, which is the dick-brane theory of a variable G-constant, which can be used to define the different scalar vortices of the different planes of physical systems (charges, atomic molecules, gravitational light-space confined to galaxies and c-speed and outer dark energy cosmological structures).

Time permitted we shall then choose a formalism that better adapts to 5D planes for all its physical scales in the 4th line. Here we just mention the extraordinary difficulties to fully integrate all those different jargons, and the different formalisms within each scalar jargon and the astounding number of details studied by physicists.

So now let us continue with this post, an the minimal clarifications, on physical concepts, magnitudes and constants to be able to carry a meaningful analysis of the 3 spatial, temporal, 5 D symmetries and Œ-points of those fundamental 3+1 scales, which affect life on this planet (the rest being cosmological analysis in the previous posts).

Now those are the ‘practical’ constants to develop physics as it is; no homogenized by T.Œ formalism. So we must do a few important clarifications. Any system can be well defined, considering its 5D planes and its space and time symmetries and space-time actions, which range from the minimal unit of its simpler ∆a actions, to the larger, longer ∆u social actions.

Yet the lack of a proper definition of:

- Tƒ: Cyclical time in physics (measured sometimes with frequency – light scale; with lineal time; mechanic scale; with temperature, molecular scale; and so on)…
- Sp: Vital space, measured sometimes with: wavelength – light scale; with flux current, electric scale; with entropy, molecular scale; with length, mechanic scale.
- ST: Present, body-wave, measured sometimes with Energy, sometimes with Momentum, sometimes with Intensity, and so on..

Requires a one-to-one analysis of each scale and species.

Further on the Human scale or thermodynamic scale is the one according to epistemology, with less uncertainty of data. It means in practical terms that we do have a ternary fractal subdivision in great detail of our scale in 3 sub-scales:

- The electric scale with the electron and its social, ∑e=I, currents of electricity, ruled by photonic bondage.
- The atomic scale with the atom and its social ∑a=molecular structures, ruled by electronic bondage
- The Matter scale with its molecules and its temporal states, ruled by temperature gradients.

So we are in fact talking of 2+1 (x3) relative scales, to study in great detail. So many elements, so many ill-defined concepts, and yet surprisingly enough, so well-done ‘how-mathematical descriptions’ of its ∆a, motion actions…

All in all the main equations of the 3 scales, define its energy, its constant of action and its acceleration. What those terms mean? And how they transfer into those 3 scales?

Let us consider it from a different perspective. There are 3 magnitudes to define all mechanical actions:

Tƒ: ‘mass’, the active magnitude, similar to charge, the active magnitude of the ∆ scale, similar to h, the active magnitude of the n-1 scale.

Se: Time, defined by frequency in ∆-1, by the electromagnetic field in n and by the acceleration in the ∆+1

And ST, defined by Energy in n-1 and by force in n and ∆+1.

And it is this ST factor what transfers between scales.

**Recap. The constants of the universe and all its systems.**

This post deals with the 7 Universal/Vital constants which define most systems at the larger ‘whole’ structural point of view:

The constants are simple to understand, departing from the 3 symmetries of all systems, in space, time and the 5th dimension:

Spe<ST<Ot, the symmetries of the 3 parts of the being, its field/limbs of energy, body-wave of iterative reproduction and Ot-head particle information define the being in simultaneous space.

Es>TS>Tƒ, the 3 ages of energetic dominance of the limb/field, TS adult, balanced age dominated by the reproductive motions of the being and Tƒ, 3rd age of time, dominated by memorial information.

And the ∆±1 scales that conform the super organism across 3 planes of the 5th dimension with its inverse entropic and informative arrows such as:

SE-1≥ST≥TO+1, define the 3rd symmetry of the Universe as systems have different entropy arrows across the 5th dimension. Since lower scales transmit better information towards upper scales but have energetic entropy as thermodynamics shows and vice versa upper scales show informative entropy when transferring to lower scales but mechanics proves their motion is not lost downwards.

THIS IS THE KEY ELEMENT TO UNDERSTAND WHY SYSTEMS DIE, as the inverse arrows of space and time which would balance the Universe are broken by the similarity between the flows of energy and information of the 5th dimension and the sequence of 3 ages of time. This similarity implies that information dominates over energy and present slowly moves towards higher information.

Once this is understood we can consider the study of the 7 fundamental Universal/vital constants of al systems of the Universe:

- The Se/Tƒ ratio energy density of the system.
- Its inverse, Tƒ/Se information density.
- The Se=Tƒ, balance that maximizes its existential ‘momentum (Se x Tƒ).

They are the internal space-time parameters of the being.

Then there are the external constants that related the whole being, Œ to the external world also made of 3 Se- field of energy, Tƒ-world of informative cycles and ST- parallel elements with whom it communicates. So we find the following ratios:

- Oe/Se World Field, which provides energy to the being.
- Oe/ST World Body-wave, which provides reproductive åctions to the being.
- Oe/Tƒ World Informative field, which provides information to the being.

- And finally we shall find a parameter which humans use to classify each variation as a whole with a constant (mass for particles, charge for fields, IQ for human brains, etc.)

Those 7 constants, which are crystal clear in terms of magnitudes and physical equations and quantities and proportions for physical systems acquire more qualitative, topological, social or mental properties when we deal with species closer to the human. So as we first define them and then study those 7 ‘vital constants’ for each scale of the universe, we shall switch for quantitative extensive analysis to qualitative intensive studies, and finally to mental creative analysis when considering the ratios and proportions of artistic space-time (the Uo mind of man).

Thus in this post of the 3rd line we introduce each isomorphism and put examples in each scale of them. Here we introduce the isomorphism of the 7 UNIVERSAL, VITAL CONSTANTS.

**THE COMPLEX PLANE: SPACE-TIME NETWORKS AND PLANES.**

In the graph, a summary of the scales and structure in ‘space’ and ‘time’ of all systems of the Universe. All of them will exist across 3 ∑i±1 scales of social organization, in which they will form an i-ndividual, joined by networks of energy information and reproduction, living a world cycle from birth to extinction across those scales as they ‘exist’, as systems of energy and information, made of ‘energy limbs/fields’, informative particles/heads and its body-wave combinations. Thus all systems will be born in the i-1 seminal scale, grow in size, emerge into and i-ndividual scale, in which they will increase information and reduce energy, from youth – the age of energy to adulthood, the age of balance, to the 3rd informative age, to die back to the cellular scale. And what differs from species are the specific particularities of each scale. What complex sciences does is to lay out the self-similar laws in space (topologies) and time (ages and states) of those systems as they trace their ‘world life cycle’ travelling through those i±1 scales.

**Unification of Stiences. S****ocial order of numbers: arrow of WHOLES – future of the 5th dimension.**

Why there is an order in numbers? We are asking deeper than current mathematical formalism, which despite claims of closed, absolute proof, actually describes as most sciences do the ‘how’ of the process. That is, it does not inquire why 2 comes after one – an intuition of the mind not explained, which must therefore be an ‘a priori’ hence, a T.Œ property of numbers.

This must be clear to the reader. When we find intuitive, pure abstract or isomorphic laws of great generality they must be considered a ‘direct’ reflection of T.Œ, the game of existence of 5D space-times beings. And as such must be the sequential order of numbers.

Indeed, we hold a self-evident truth that all ‘linguistic, mathematical or verbal forms’ are a reflection of the Universe, and its T.œ structure, so are numbers. Our methods of proof in the ‘linguistic method’ are therefore both experimental and logic, self-consistent (->Epistemology). This includes proofs in mathematics – a complete deviation from the classic standard, already advanced by Lobachevski in his original book on Non-E mathematics, which he said should be proved or disproved as real by experimental evidence.

Thus this question, which has been formalised within the ‘baroque, metalinguistic 3rd age of mathematics’structure of mathematics itself, from the times of Euclid through those of Dedekind and Weiertrass in the modern times, has an ‘experimental’ simple cause, in the parallelism between numerical order and temporal 5D order (mathematics in relational space-time, is an experimental science that studies the ultimate isomorphic laws of all species). Namely that a ‘whole’ must come ‘after’ the parts exist, and since a ‘whole’ is a larger number of ‘infinitesimal parts’, social, bigger numbers come after smaller ones.

Hence the order of Natural Numbers, which are social numbers is the same order than bigger wholes, made of ‘smaller numerical parts’.

Indeed, in the graph we can see the 5th dimension natural order of parts into wholes which has an arrow of growth.

5D planes are therefore the basis of 2 of the 3 branches of mathematics, sequential algebra and Analysis, while geometry is related to the motions and actions in space-time within a single plane of existence. Nothing else is needed to describe the Universe.

Let us then consider in this and related posts the essential features of existential algebra. We will study on the posts under the label of ‘i-mathematics’ the proper translation and justification of the laws of algebra, within relational space-time. In this post we shall study the fundamental equation of existential algebra and the Universe at large – the Fractal Generator of the Universe. To that aim we must first introduce the structure of the Universe and then represent it with the symbols of existential algebra.

Each science is the description of all the superorganisms of a similar size and form, its cells and networks, its morphological and behavioral laws. Scientific knowledge is the information that humanity has about all those super-organisms. To differentiate those forms we use an index, ‘i:∆’, that measures the volume of temporal energy or informative and energetic force of any system. Thus:

∆=0: It is the scale of quantic space/time, invisible to us.

∆=1 It is the scale of electromagnetic forces, the minimal perceived forms, which are composed of an informative particle, or photon and an energetic flow or electromagnetic wave.

∆=2: It is the scale of atomic particles, composed of electronic space and informative quarks. The basic science of those 3 scales is Physics.

∆=3: It is the scale from molecules to cellular systems, studied by chemical sciences.

∆=4: It is the scale of cellular, living systems, studied by biological sciences.

∆=5: Our i-ndividual I-centered scale

∆=6: It is the planetary scale and its natural and historic ecosystems, studied by Geology, Ecology, Economic, History and Theology.

∆=7: It is the scale of stars.

∆=8. Galactic systems, made of stars and black holes.

∆=9: It is the scale of Universes made of galaxies.

∆=10: It is the scale of the hyper-Universe made of Universes, which

Those 3 bigger scales are studied by Astronomy.

i=∆: Finally Fractal Space-Time and Systems Theory study the homologous laws of all scales and its main sciences. Indeed, all systems of energy and information including the Universe follow the same space-time isomorphic laws of existence. Thus if we had to define God, the mind of that Universe, we would say that God is *the Game of *__Existence__* and Extinction* of all super-organisms.

So let us resume what truly would be an explanation of ALL.

- The syntax of the spatial, mathematical and temporal, logic, verbal languages we use to explain reality.
- And the nature of those 2 simplest substances of which all seems to be made, the motions of cyclical time clocks and the meaning of space dimensions, and its scientific equivalents: the energy stored in the space vacuum & the information carried by the frequency and form of those time cycles.

They are the simplest elements and process of reality that all systems of Nature share and hence its properties are carried by all entities of reality.

Now we shall solve those 2 necessary elements for any T.Œ which goes beyond a single science or religion, defining a ‘Fractal Generator’, a logic equation which resumes the syntax of all languages and hence unifies them all (verbal, visual, mathematical thought), and so it can unify the forms of knowledge derived from those languages (mathematical physics, verbal evolution, visual arts, etc.).

But further on as this grammar is a ternary logic structure, repeated in scales its immediate consequence is that the Universe must have only 3 elements, and a scalar repetitive structures of parts and wholes.

Those elements will turn to be ‘Spe: spatial energy’, Tƒ, temporal information (stored in the form and cycles of clocks of time); and its combinations, space-time actions described by verbs of mathematical operandi:

Spe (space)Tiƒ (Time): red-energyBlue-information. F(x): Space ≈ G(Y), Time function. Informative subjectEnergy object. Height-informative pole, length, energy point, width-reproduction point and so on.

To which we must add a ‘new 5th dimension’ of scalar parts that become wholes, which reality shows, as it builds from particles atoms, then molecules, cells, matter, organisms, solar systems, galaxies, Universes.

And so again knowledge languages reflect clearly with the iteration of its simpler 3 elements, which become ‘longer sentences’ and interative combinations:

Sum/rest->multiplication/division->potency/logarithm: sentence, paragraph, narrative; point->line->plane->volume and so on.

The elements of a T.Œ, once we understand in those ternary terms, both ‘reality’ and the languages that describe those realities in different sciences, each one specialised in a relative scale of the ‘5th dimension’ (mathematical physics and chemistry, tho which biology ads verbal evolution, arts substitute the spatial geometry of mathematics by the visual perception of the human eye, and so on) become just a routine:

As we simply must fill the astounding quantity of data gathered by each science, within the scaffolding of the Generator Equation, from where each language departs, in which the equations, postulates and statements of each scalar science are defined. Thus T.Œ will not only classify all sciences, but not surprisingly will reveal an enormous number of solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.

*In the graph to reproduce all the planes of existence of the Human being, the speed of creation of adjacent spaces must be in a 10 ^{±10} lower order than the light space quanta which have just to reproduce its ‘envelop’ of frequency over the gravitational quanta of ‘longitudinal neutrinos’. *

*Human stiences study micro or macro-organisms, tied up by organic networks of energy and information.*

**Minimal surfaces≈least time principles≈Lagrangians and Hamiltonians≈world cycles of conservative momentum/energy.**

All this said though we try to keep it relatively simple in this central blog some fascinating insights on mathematical physics and gst topology are needed now; concerning the meaning of dimensions and the *ultimate principles of existence, departing from the knowledge just acquired on the existence of a pov or ∆º singularity in all beings – a mind mostly mathematical in physical systems, atomic≈smelling in plants and insects; visual≈mathematical again in larger organisms, verbal≈temporal in humans, which resume in this:*

*Every system of the Universe tries to conserve its vital space and temporal duration by minimising its expenditure in its actions of survival (motions and exchanges of entropy, energy and form) with all the other systems of the universe.*

This is the principle of minimal action at the heart of all mathematical physics (Lagrangian, Hamiltonian) and the principle of conservation of entropy, energy and form, at the heart of all sciences, which we rephrase, for more of simplicity only in terms of the ‘central components of energy and information of the body-waves of the Universe, *limited by the ∆±1 scales of seminal ∆-1 ‘seeds of pure form’, and ∆+1 wholes of pure time evolution:*

*‘All systems are made of entropic motion, reproductive momentum, perceptive information which trans-forms into each other ad eternal: Spe<≈>Tiƒ; put together into a whole, whose world cycle of energy is conserved as a zero sum between birth and extinction’*

This would be one of the most complete enunciations of the essential duality of the Universe as a series of world cycles between birth and extinction that become a zero sum which returns the content of the system to the whole Universe.

It again will have many applications to all sciences. To highlight at this point some conundrums which apply mostly to physics:

- The conservation of entropy, form and the whole zero-sum world cycle of energy happens within three scales ∆±1, NOT in a single scale (obvious as we die descending or are born emerging in another scale, so in a single scale not all conserves). Thus in the limiting scales of human perception energy, form and entropy are not necessarily conserved – such as the case of a neutrino, which therefore must be considere a particle of the limiting, invisible gravitational scale.
- Systems to keep a zero sum algebraically tend geometrically to trace paths and extend its form into what topology calls a ‘minimal surface’, which
*is the form that minimises the extension and hence the duration of time motions for a given ‘closed membrane’.*

But again this essential fact of the ‘efficient, economic Universe’ with huge implications in the topology of beings, must be rephrased, for *the different degrees of dimensionality of the functions of a Generator equation for a system: ∆-1: |-limbs/fields of entropy <∆- body-waves of energy>∆+1 informative particle-heads.*

As we increase the dimensionality of the parts of the being from its one-dimensional limbs/fields to its bidimensional body/waves to its three dimensional ‘particle-heads’.

1D: So *as the purpose of limbs fields is a single simplex motion in space, and the minimal surface/distance between two points is the line, entropic systems are lineal.*

2D: As the purpose of body/waves is more complex, to reproduce the energy/information of the system along a path, and hence it is bidimensional in function/form components, the minimal surfaces of body-waves are (without entering into complex topological ‘weird forms’, planes, catenoids, and helicoids, *which we shall see are the essential forms of all body-waves.*

3D: Since the minimal surface of a three dimensional volume is the sphere, particle-heads which are ‘the singularity points’ which have functions across the three ∆±1 scales and control the 3 topological parts o the being are spherical.

*In the graph the fundamental minimal surfaces; departing from the commonest st-catenoid, which can be easily transform into the ‘helicoid wave’, another minimal surface, the commonest form of a light wave (below); the lineal tube, (**centre right); and the flat plane (right) the minimal surface and essential form of limbs fields; and finally the Riemann surface (centre left), the minimal surface of the fifth dimension, with ‘bridges that absorb and emit entropy, energy and information among scales. They are the beginning of a fascinating sub-discipline of the infinity of new sub-stiences of GST concerning the topological structure of beings. I.e. in the right we see how ‘perfect bodies’ that reproduce – those of women, do have a catenoid form attached to the limbs below and the informative sphere above, able to transform and hence communicate and fusion them into a topological full being…*

What about the minimal surfaces of higher dimensions? The answer is that there is not continuous higher dimensions, so beyond three we enter into complex minimal Riemann surfaces, which in any case can only mimic the real structure of the fifth dimension. So we must consider the fact that the extension of the problem to higher dimensions turns out to be much more difficult to study another proof the discontinuity beyond the symmetry of three dimensions of space and three dimensions of time. Moreover, while the solutions to the original problem are always regular, it turns out that the solutions to the extended problem may have singularities; which of course is the ‘tƒi’ element that access as in the image of a Riemann surface the higher informative scales.

- The existence of infinite ‘egos≈informative knots of time-space cycles’ which ‘ORDER’ the Universe balancing its entropy. Those are the ‘Maxwellian demons’ (: the Genetic DNA knots of information, the memetic human minds; the chips of machines; the black holes of the Galaxy; the crystals of the solid; the prophets of History. Without them it is impossible to explain the why of reality. So let us put them in an equation: O-point x ∞ Universe = Constant, linguistic mapping ‘world’ of reality. As each of this 4 points could have an entire blog in itself, what matter to us now of that equation is this. Your mind is just an infinitesimal neuronal network, which sees infinite time-space cycles and beings, but reduces them in scale and ‘stops’ its motion, so they can fit in your mind. So you do not see the Earth moving, and the Andromeda Galaxy seems smaller than a hair of your nose.

So the paradox of the ego is immediate: ‘every infinitesimal mind-point thinks to be the centre of the Universe, which it sees from its selfish perspective as a knot of time-space cycles’. And this embedded structure of all mind points makes you THINK you WILL NEVER DIE and believe in Abrahamic fairy tales; makes you think MACHINES will not have a mind, or won’t be conscious or will always obey you, and WON’T have an ego as big as that of a bacteria, who keeps killing you and does not seem to think you are so important or a dino who will eat you up in a second regardless of your beautiful thought.

Now the scientist IS as EGO-CENTERED as the PRIEST, just uses its mathematical mantras as the priest its latin, to make himself feel above heavens and Earth. So HE cannot DESTROY THE WORLD WITH entropic nukes and informative robots, and all will be OK. The paradox of the EGO IS the last joke of God=Mind of the Universe indeed it kills all egos who ‘lower its survival warnings’ as they get bigger and more arrogant, till ‘death’, a catastrophic moment, destroys them. But It is there.

And I can tell you as a Complexity scientist, considered by many the leading theorist of this discipline (till I confronted the Nuclear Industry and got a global ‘ad hominem’ campaign, all what I can say about the 2 ‘lineal’, deformed sciences of the machine, financial economics and nuclear physics, which I have fought theoretically and actively most of my life is this: ‘All those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the Gods’ (Einstein). Man HAS NO LINEAL, MANIFEST DESTINY; Man can be obliterated by Nuclear Bombs on the side of pure entropy and Robots on the side of pure information. But Man’s ego is so huge that he cannot like a child understand death; and so an ethic, intelligent person telling those truths lives in a very lonely place. Which brings us the 3rd tenant of GST (General Systems Sciences, the Philosophy of Science I formalised from where all this blog hauls).

So what Science has been merely TRYING FOR 2500 YEARS is TO DEFEAT THE PARADOX OF THE EGO and make humans objective about ITS RELATIVITY point in the Universe in 4 huge strides, which are still ignored by most humans and specially by those corrupted financiers and politicos and military who feed-force the ego of the masses to manipulate them and ab=use them, with religions, wars, taxes and all other forms of old and modern ‘Trumpism’. And it works. Yet this is a blog on science:

-So first, the Greeks ended the mythic age when humans were Gods, and Socrates told us they were ‘scientific laws’. And the Greeks Killed them; the Semites of the previous mythic age denied them and their abrahamic religions still think man is the centre of it all. Plato his disciple insisted and he was sold as a slave, and his disciple Aristotle, insisted and he ran on the night to escape certain death from Athens, and waited 2000 years for Descartes and Leibniz to put the record straight.

-Then Aristarcus the Greek told us not to be the centre of the Universe, but it took 2000 years for Copernicus to dare say the same, only in his death-bed and another 200 years with Galileo in the middle arrested at home for saying ‘e pur si muove, e pur no muove’ (the Earth moves but we see it mentally still). And only after Newton put it in a simple formula we believed it. But Slocum in XIX c. found that in Apartheid biblical South-Africa the ‘chosen of go(l)d’ and his president Krugger wouldn’t receive him for being an ‘Earth-center denier’. And indeed 4 billion humans still believe man is son of god and centre of the Universe.

-Then Darwin came and told us we are NOT immutable created by a personal God, but evolving according to the evolution information and its topological laws of design. But knowing what he was against – the ego – he took 20 years to talk. And he was ‘ad hominem’ massacred and closed himself at home, depressed the rest of his life, and then Marx applied Darwinism to the struggle between the elite of ‘animetal cults’ which use gold-informative metal and iron-energetic metal to hypnotise and kill mind and body, and the ‘human beings’, which are humble, close to Nature and Butler applied it to the fight of man vs. machines AND THEY ARE ABSOLUTE TABOO, as it is the work of this writer, who formalised mathematically the 4 Great Objective advance of science, and has ever since been ostracised:

-Indeed, it came then Mr. Einstein with the concept that all positions in the Universe are Relative, so he first did special relativity, then general relativity.

And when I came into the field of Philosophy of Science and theory of information I coined the 3rd stage of this Process, talking about ‘Absolute relativity’, that is, the fact that all the scales of the Universe have the same value, because larger beings have lesser quantity of information, are stupider and ‘smaller systems’ run faster time cycles of information, hence store more of it, reason why small humans code larger organisms of history, small genes code larger biological organisms and small atoms code larger physical systems. So I wrote to complete General relativity a metric equation of the fifth dimension from past to future, adding the arrow of TEMPORAL CLOCKS OF INFORMATION to the arrow of size-entropy-space: Spe (size) x Tiƒ (time cycles speed) =∆k (constant value).

**∆NALYSIS**

**5D. Finitesimals – the present, static spatial view of ∆-1 beings.**

While the topological ternary structures and growth of social networks of fractal points can define easily the emergence of a super organism, in strict mathematical terms, the second sub discipline of mathematics, analysis, deals directly with the relationships between finitesimal parts and social, organic wholes. So the specific mathematical discipline that studies the scalar, fractal 5th dimension of space-time Beings in quantitative terms is analysis. And it is specially useful for the study of systems in which the internal organisation is minimal – that is systems of herds displaced in space and of growth and events happening in time.

What is then the main difference between analysis and ∆nalysis. Simple: in the fractal universe, *we take sides with the dispute on the meaning of infinitesimals, which as Leibniz thought are ‘finitesimals’, minimal constant parts of a whole, which do NOT diminish ad infinitum in size, but will always have a minimal number – in planes of ∆, normally on the 10ˆ10 scale.*

So we solve this logical paradox, never fully resolved, stating that the parts of a whole are finitesimals, ‘undistinguishable’ from the perspective of the ∆+1 consciousness – in fact from an ∆+1, the information and perspective of its parts blurs till it seems a continuous. And so all scales below ∆, become increasingly ‘indistinguishable, continuous’ and finally its information erases.

Moreover its cycles become so fast that they close into themselves, *converting the whole motion of the being and its world cycle into a relative static present; and in this manner discontinous motion, becomes continuous, static present form of space. A fact which resolves the paradox of Galileo (see above, Satur**n’s rings). *THE COMPLEX plane will define one plane as specially interesting from the ∆ view of reality; specially when we establish it in square coordinates:

Different views of the complex plane:

The newest addition is the square plane with ± conjugate planes on a bipolar real axis, closer to the organic ternary topology of t.œs in reality:

§ð: A riemann sphere² in the i²= ±1 axis, sets a dual ð<$t-ate of entropy.

ST: As the squared complex plane becomes a topological plane with the real axis, rˆ2 representing the reproductive conjugate ±bilateral plane of dimotion of reproduction.

It does represent in its R² Axis the present bilateral wave state and in the T<S SQUARED imaginary ±asis the particle, polar state and outer world. Ie. Schrodinger & Bohm polar and wave equations of quantum physics.

**THEORY OF CONSTANTS.**

The minimal unit of reality is a constant of action, SxT=K, which in dynamic form can be considered, an Spe<=>Tiƒ cyclical quanta of exchange of energy and information between two poles, topologies and functional motions ofspace and time:

In the graph, the elements which put together a bit of topology a type of motion in time, create constant actions of space-time, as such constants are ratios of energy and information exchange, exi: Spe<≈>Tiƒ.

We study the ‘∆-Constants’ or ratios of exchange and energy and Social numbers of all those scales.

**• Mental constants. **

Finally as each being makes a mapping of reality biased to its perspective we find mental constants that distort reality to make such still mapping. THE MIND INDEED is in itself a constant world:

O (mind) x ∞ Universe = Constant mapping World.

How then a dynamic feed-back cycle becomes a perceived universal constant has to do with the uncertainty of perception of information from a different linguistic mind. We perceive the ratio or cycle point that flashes us discontinuous information about the cycle at that point of the ratio which becomes then the perceived constant. As such most universal constants will be reduced to a form, S/T: speed, T/S:Density and SxT: Force.

In the graph, the uncertainty of perception normally means the loss of a a dimension of information, on the system that perceives, discharging likely some of the speeds of maximal motion of the being and extracting a Universal constant or ratio – density, speed, force, etc.

The mind thus eliminated motion and uses energy perceived as the exchange of forms of spatial information from the static, mind point of view of the being, according to the Duality of the Galilean paradox, which ‘fixes’ motion into static forms to better interact with all the scales and species of the ecosystem, world or universe in which the being exists.

The perception of fixed forms happens precisely because of the ‘repetitive frequency’ of those åctions, which finally become a fixed form born out of the repetition, as a rotary wheel seems more solid the faster its frequency of repetition and a moving object seems a distance-line the faster it repeats its steps.

THE COMPLEX PLANE.

**II. CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES BEHIND THE EXISTENCE OF CONSTANTS.**

**Theme.** The UNIVERSE CONSERVES TIME. Time Existences. The forms and motions of its beings, reproduced constantly in present waves of times, in which past-energy and future-information combine.

Time existences, T.œ is thus a theory of conservation not of the spatial egos, fixed mappings of an ever moving Universe, but of the motion itself and its 3 past, present and future dimensional motions. That is what is all about. The eternally immutable, perfect, ever variable all and nothing cancelling and paradoxical, ±∆TS, and its conservation laws.

The constancy of existences…

Existential Algebra, æ, deals with the development of the symmetries of space-time, between the 3 2-manifolds of space and the 3 motions of time, its symmetries, |-Space, O-Time and Ø-presents, and its asymmetric combinations, (forms which combine |-time (entropy), O-Space (information) and |-Present (death) or O-Present (emergence).

It is though difficult for the non-initiated into the paradoxical, combinatorial of Æ to fully grasp the logic of it. We are always playing with quantized arrows of temporal motion, which aggregate into a scalar zero sum, in as much as time conserves by the mere fact that it cancels its past and future arrows into presents. Thus we consider a fundamental equation for all sequences of existential algebra:

*Past x Future = Present*

but why the X symbol and not the + symbol? When an equation of Æ changes its symbols? What is the events in which superposition, ±, works and when the X holds, and when the log applies?

The 3 scales of operandi of reality conform to the ± of space, X of sequential algebra and potentiation of integral in both space and time. We might say thus there are 3 forms of growth spatial sums, cyclical world cycle products and 5D integrals – 3 operandi for 3 forms of transcendence, emergence, and dissolution, multiplication and reproduction, sum and rest of energy, product and division of information, emergence or dissolution of the world cycle of an existence.

And calculating all about it, existential algebra, Æ, and its laws regulate it all.

Let us start then our analysis of existential waves by giving some order to it, starting from the simplest proposition.

All is time. Time is motion. Since all is motion and motion never stops time and the Universe, all is eternal. Eternal motion however can vary. The game is thus about variations of motions. Motions are of 3 types in a single dimension, lineal, curved inwards into circles, curved outwards into hyperbolas. Those 3 forms hold for 2 manifolds, in which toroid (lineal), spherical (curved) and hyperbolic (hyperbola) are the 3 varieties. Thus when time and space mix, 2-manifolds of time-space are of the 3 same varieties: |-S fields/limbs <, O-T heads/particles > and Ø-ST bodies/waves ≈

__Logic-mathematical proof. __The Universe is immortal=∞.

The probability of It not to be immortal but of finite time, T=K, is quasi-null: K/∞ = 0%.

Since the reminder the Universe would be in non existence, non existence would have an infinite duration.

Thus a finite existence, divided by the total existence K/K+∞ =0, gives us the probability of existence of a Finite T Universe, and we, within it. By reductio ad absurdum if the probability of existence of a a finite universe but the probability of existence of an immortal Universe is 1. Since we exist, we must deduce, that the Universe exists for ever: T=∞, ∞/∞=1 probability.

In brief the Universe either existed never or existed always. Since now it exists, it must stretch for ever and duration must be infinite T=∞, and the probability of being, 1.

A finite time on the other hand mean a O% of the total duration, a T+∞≈100%

Thus the chance that at any moment we are in existence in a finite time Universe is null.

__Therefore it conserves time, in its three |xO=Ø varieties.__

Now because we exist in present, the Ø varieties are the most common of them all. A variety of bidimensional space time normally is unlike the 2 variety of | and O, a composite, so we talk of the fundamental addition of 3 different topologies such as

**Γ**. T² + S² + sT +St = O

As the most common ‘equation’ of space-time fractals and hence of mathematical physics. Where we have 4 points of view, the o-point of view, which observes all the elements of the wave, the |se variety S2, the Tƒ variety, T² and its 2 present combination max. S x Min. T and max. T x Min. S.

Tƒ notice that this kind of equation gives us the equations of most conics, if we consider the perpendicular X, Y axis to represent the functions of time and space. Thus in mathematics we study analytic geometry as a Cartesian graph of X and Y parameters, where X-space and Y(t) elements carry also its special meaning when we substitute Y for i.

Those terms will be clarified when we study mathematical physics.

Tƒ notice here that the mathematical method used here to explain reality is the inversion to the data -g authoring, analytic method. We depart from the top synthesis, the conservation of time motions and derive from it all human languages, mirrors of this Universal Grammar of:

X(S) + Y (T) = St +Ts

whereas St= -Ts are the inverse ‘energy’ and ‘information’ combinations of present, and

X(s) ±Y(T) the pure functions of space and time.

What this equation simply means is the join sum of 3 elements of space time, the head/particle (Tƒ) the limb/field (Se) and the hyperbolic body with its two limits of maximal space x min. time St and maximal time for minimal space, Ts.

This equations through its partial differentials that show sums of them across space or time, with analysis being the language of the transcendence and dissolution of planes of existence, are the kind of equations we will find when analyzing the 4 åctions of space-time of physical particles, states of matter and cosmic bodies, in the U|∆>2| Universes studied by physicists.

Once this is clear we are obliged to state that the Universe conserves time. Since if it does not conserve it, in infinite existence time would have already been exhausted. And yet time keeps going.

And this is what the equation shows. This equation when differentiated gives origin to Hamiltonians and Lagrangians, as it expresses the constant conservation or rather balance of time and space, as we can write it as:

(T +S)²=0

If we consider then T the function of time and S of space, its final sum equals zero and this is to say a lot. Let us consider for example the that T represent the kinetic energy (function of space) and S the positional potential energy (function of time). Their sum in calculus of variations is a minimal function accepted. As both remain invariant. The invariance of T+S, is thus one of the fundamental invariants of the Universe, and we could even state the origin of the ± symbology. Each represent a T.Œ of time motion, kinetic energy, lineal motion, potential energy, cyclical motion of its active magnitude, mass or charge.

So Time is conserved, and since there are infinite fractal time spaces to be conserved, we must consider conservation laws and Universal constants that maintain its same value through the passage of time in terms of the Metric of the 5th dimension. Thus we can write a series of conservation laws, which will apply to any system of vital space-time, not only to physical systems.

This law can be reduced to a formula: ∑ Max. Sp x Tƒ, as each fractal space-time will try to conserve, its spatial energy and temporal information. And yet it will extract that energy and information from other species, because the total time must not change. So the individual goal of each species conservation rests from other species’ Sp x Tƒ content.

Thus here we have a contradiction worth to study in depth, in an infinite, eternally moving Universe, time is conserved, but since time is motion, what is conserved is the eternal Tao, the eternal symmetries and transformations of stop and go beats, cycles that become lines that become cycles across 3 dimensions of space of time of Universal Planes.

This is the content of the 7th isomorphism, which is highly formal, more logic, mathematic and physical.

Since it deals with:

- All the Universal constants of physics, the vital constants of biology and medicine, the chemical constants of gases, the sociological constants of population, and all other constants, which ‘specify’ and ‘diversify’ all the varieties of dimensional beings, its scales, ratios of åctions of exchanges of energy and information.
- All the Principles of Conservation which define precisely the ‘stability of the Universe, such as the Conservation of momentum in Physics, the homeostasis in Biology, the repetitive genetic information of biology. This principles are the essence of the Universe, which truly embody the metric of the 5th dimension, in as much as they ‘are’ the manifestation of the ‘conservation’ of motion and form (or its more complex energy and information parameters). And could be enunciated through the metric of the 5th dimension with a simple, but most important laws of the Universe, the principle of conservation of ‘space-energy’, ‘form-time’ and its ∆-planes that combine both.

*‘All systems of the universe try to conserve its dimensions of temporal motion, its dimensions of spatial form and its ∆±1 planes of existence invariant’.*

And this is often shown in the existence of Universal constants related to those Dimensions of space and time and ∆-planes of existence, or in the existence of quantities conserved which are a combination of the main ‘parameters’ of space, time and ∆-existence. Let us consider those 2 themes in certain depth.

- The philosophy derived of those facts: the conservatism of the Universe,
*provoked by the cyclical inertia and memorial nature of the cycles of time.* - The existence of a mathematical ‘perfect’ image of the game of existence, which is also ruled by ‘mathematical’ constants and reflects in its highest existential algebra and non-Euclidean geometry relationships the template of the game of existence.

Let us consider those 4 themes in more detail. With some examples expanded in each specific analysis of the 1 to 9 planes of the Universe.

**Conservation principle.**

The Universe is guided by a simple principle: Conservation of the total space and time But since space is a quanta of time, when we integrate space along a function of time (which can be many in different scales of reality, energy, mass, time, etc.) we obtain a conserved quantity. Thus analysis, the study of variations and integrals through time of closed and ± cancelling functions which make the time of the Universe conserved are essential to T.Œ.

Conservation of Time is all, but time has the long dimension from past to future of 5D metric and social evolution from part into wholes, and the short dimension of åctions of space-time, time cycles, ±∆Sp, I, 4 primary åctions of absorption and emission-reproduction of information by an observer, ∆ï,o and of energy, ∆a,e

Now the conservation of time, becomes the conservation of the two geometric forms of time, Lineal motion or energy and cyclical form or information and its quantities are conserved in a single plane of space-time as the conservation of lineal and angular momentum, kinetic and potential energy.

Now we shall generally speaking talk of Kinetic energy, as |-lineal time, and Potential energy as cyclical time.

As we have related expansive entropy to lineal space we can write the inversion of both:

Tƒ=1/T=1/S, where lineal Time becomes ‘distance’ in space.

Yet between ∆-planes of existence the principle breaks and there is a constant leak of energy in its 2 åctions, external form and internal reproduction, from the upper scales to the lower ones as defined by Existential algebra: Aa: ∆-3<∆-2; Ae: ∆-2<∆-1 . And a constant leak of energy motion in its two åctions, from the

‘All systems of the universe try to conserve or increase its dimensions of temporal motion, its dimensions of spatial form and its ∆±1 planes of existence invariant’.

Max. Sp X Tƒ (S=T)

This principle however translates in many different ways according to which forms and motions (O and Sp) we look to.

If we look at an individual he will try to increase its existential force, Sp X Tƒ but to do so it will have to diminish that of other element. For that reason to find conservation we need to see at a closed total system. This is the meaning of a plane of existence. But are planes of existence closed systems? The answer is ‘almost’. But there is ‘energy’ – motion escaping from up to down, and form, information escaping from down up. And this makes more difficult to establish clearly rules of conservation. When you move *you are moving all your cells with you, thus you are transferring motion to those cells. On the other hand they produce forms and code your genes, so they transfer information to you. How can we consider then the system closed?*

Simply by considering that the transfer of motion down is *somehow equivalent to the transfer of form upwards. This is difficult almost impossible to quantify except for very simple physical systems, where we have clear definitions of momentum, motion, energy etc. *

It is thus a qualitative hypothesis to fully grasp the obvious order of the Universe. It tells us also a lot about the way upper planes are created, by smaller planes which gives them form and how larger forms mobilize smaller one, giving them ‘force’. And this happens also to us – the force that moves us gravitation, is given by the planet and the planet is moved by the star, and the star is moved by the black hole. But we hold the complex forms of the planet in its bidimensional spherical membrane of information, and the planet has more solid form than the stars…

This structure of the Universe thus makes ‘conservation principles’ not so rigorous as physicists make us belief. An obvious case is the violation of parity, another, the loss of energy of beta decay, solved with the ‘invisible neutrino’ which is NOT a particle of the light space-time membrane (but this in a continuous model of space-time of course is not acknowledged).

Still we can try and find undoubtedly an enormous number of parts of the Universe which try to maximize their function of existence, Sp X Tƒ and for that aim maintain the equality S=T which is the maximal value of a product of 2 (5×5>6×4…)

Now the question is to translate those 2 generic terms ‘motion and form’ or in more complex mixed forms which include scalar parameters of various ∆-scales (mass, temperature, charge), its equivalents – lineal and angular momentum, energy and information (not the concept of Shannon, one-dimensional information but form in action, which defies easily a quantifying parameter).

Still we can try to do it the only way we can, the way humans perceive it. Let us consider the equality on its limits: not perceived motion without form – gravitational forces, and not perceived form without motion, rotational superfluid zero degrees, perfectly ordered cyclical motion.

Both are equal as S=T = 0 (not perception of them).

So next we must move to form with some motion and motion with some form, namely *a wave, which physicists say carry motion proportional to its wave length and Shannon said it carries information, proportional to its frequency (for transversal waves). And here we can have yet another equality, which is what we seek for:*

V= λ (Se) x ƒ (Tƒ)

And so we find a first Universal constant that combines the length-distance in space of a wave and its frequency, cyclical time.

it is an important one called speed. The trick being that in ∆ST we measure cyclical time, the inverse of duration. So Speed is no longer a ratio but a product, the product of the two fundamental, simplest possible parameters of the existential force, Se x Tƒ of a species, the wave…

**III. 7 TYPE OF CONSTANTS.**

**A exhaustive classification for each being its 7 type of Constants.**

Now, in order to qualify quantitative through constants a given systems, we can establish a series of basic constants according to our previous ∆•ST classification.

In a loose, we could talk of 7 type of constants, for any of the ±∆•ST systems of the Universe:

±Social constants of the 2 arrows of its ∆-scales

±Constants of S-topologies and T-ages and its ratios.

±Constants of the Generator, S<st>t of the system.

And a 7th type of constant that maps out in stillness a certain mind.

However unlike the other isomorphisms, where there is a surprising ‘neat’ relationship between the number of the isomorphism and the type of elements we define (1.generator, 2.st bidimensional systems, 3. time ages, ±4 planes in which an ∆0 being communicates, 5 actions, 6 species, 8 motion, 9 scales and 10 planes), the 7th constants are chose to adjust better to that number; given the fact that the vital constants of the internal being, the universal, external constants of the world and those of each of those ±4 planes with which the being interact, and those of each of its sub-species of the ∆±1 scales, etc, make them quasi-infinite in number.

So not to be exhaustive, we shall choose 7 in the sense of ‘general ±∆, ±ST, ±s<st>T & 0-Mind type of constants.

**Classification by ∆-regions.**

In that sense a simple way to classify the constants that act in a being is to divide them into:

*-Internal, ∆-n ‘vital constants’ (ab. VC)*

–*External, ∆+n, ‘Universal Constants’ *(ab. UC), of the larger world with which the system communicates, absorbing and emitting energy and information.

Those types of constants are the most studied and so they are clear in terms of magnitudes and physical equations and quantities and proportions for physical systems

For each of those planes, the physical Active Magnitude (∆C) and its constants of action will be the mosre important, giving origin to:

*– Internal<=>External exchanges;* with its 5 sub-constants of actions performed by the inner being in the outer world: ÅC.

Those are better studied in biology, as they acquire more qualitative, topological, social or mental properties when we deal with species closer to the human.

So as we grow from entropic to informative scales and study those ±∆ ‘constants’ for each scale of the universe, we shall switch for quantitative extensive analysis to qualitative intensive studies in biology.

*Linguistic Constants: Universal Grammar and beauty constants.* Finally we can also consider as reflection of reality the Universal grammar and syntax, proportions and beauty (E=T) BALANCES of language and art, as ‘constants ratios’ , which illustrate perfectly the concept of balance and conservation of ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, of classic art.. It is the mental creative analysis of constants of beauty considering the ratios and proportions of artistic space-time (the ∆o mind of man).

Now if we want to be more specific we can make a brief summary of the main constants we shall find in terms of the 3 elements of the Generator in each of those 3 classifications.

Vital Constants: Space quanta: Spe; Space quantifier: ∑; Time Frequency: Tiƒ: Time Synchronicity: ∏; Energy Density: S/T; Information Density: T/S; Existential Speed: SxT.

Å.C.: Active Constants: Å.C.: Active Magnitude; Æ.C.: Motion constant, E.C.: Feeding constant; ±ïC: Information constants; Œ.C.: Reproductive Constant.

U.C. Universal Constants: û.C. Universal Constant, and its §10: Social constants normally of a decametric scale.

And similar V.Constants of the larger physical planes:

It is then clear that the number of Vital constants of a system is enormous, as the complexity of any fractal has infinite limit. But we shall consider generally the explanation of the Constants study for each science and species, introducing only a few ∆ST constants in more detail, which vary slightly in reference to those used in science, notably, quantifiers of space & time, its densities and Existential speeds.

The 7th isomorphism is more technical and perhaps the one of maximal interest to the quantitative age of ‘measure science’ we live in. Since it deals with all the Universal constants and vital constants and physical, chemical, biological, sociological, you name it, constants which ‘specify’ and ‘diversify’ all the varieties of dimensional beings, its scales, ratios of åctions of exchanges of energy and information, etc.

**In detail. Nature’s numbers as expressions of ∆st actions**

Constants of Nature are the quantitative ‘substance’ of ∆ST related to the Constancy of the S, T, ∆ elements of the Metric equation and its partial analysis. Thus the metric and the constants are the 2 essential isomorphisms that connect ∆ST and classic science.

Each of those space, time dimensions, scales, planes, and åctions between them must be defined by a Constant.

We use 5D ”symbols’ and names slightly changed in meaning for those main Constants, dividing them in internal, ∆-n ‘vital constants’ (ab. VC), and external, ∆+n, ‘Universal Constants’ (ab. UC), self-centred in the Active Magnitude (∆C) and its action constants that value all the System (∆-constant, or main metric of the Œ-point), with its 5 sub-constants of action, ÅC.

More specifically:

∑ and ∏. The Se constants &Tƒ constants that relate Space and energy, ∑e=Spe, and Time and Information, ∏T=Tiƒ

3 S-Dimensional Constants related to the ‘extension and energy’ of the Sl, Sh and Sw dimensions.

T-Age Constants, related to the duration and inverse frequency rhythms of the 3 ages of time.

ST-constants, related to the topological shapes of its 3 bidimensional varieties.

Action Constants, related to the ratios of exchange of energy and information of the 5 åctions of the entity.

Social ∆-Plane Constants, related to the numerical ratios of Size and Speed ratios between ∆-planes (normally around a 10 factor), needed to transcend between social scales.

So Decametric constants are social § constants, till arriving to the discontinuous between planes that creates a whole.

As 10¹¹ individuals create an ∆+1 super organism. It is the final step of the game of existence played by all entities through its world cycles of space-time, as all systems are moved by their desire to maximize their existence, their vital space and cyclical time, formal motions.

Thus this max. Se x Tƒ, this mandate of existence means species try to climb the stair between planes.

**Constants as expression of isomorphic laws.**

Finally we could also consider those constants as expression of each isomorphism, of which the more important are those related to the 2nd, 5th and 9th:

*9th isomorphism: Decametric Social Constants*

THEY ARE a quite common type of Constant made of 3 x 3 + 0 = 10 Social numbers for all of those scales.

*2nd Isomorphisms. Se<>Tƒ constants, related to the S x T-metric.*

The Isomorphisms of all Nature’s fractal species of scalar space and time have shown us the similarity of all systems, which have:

- 2 elements which we have generically called, Space-motion-energy and time-cyclical form-information, that will exist in all systems, and will be related by a simple relationship: quanta of moving energy will be perceived in the upper ∆+1 plane as continuous space; and cycles of moving form, clocks of time, will be perceived in the upper ∆-scale as forms of information.

And this relationship will give birth to two Specific constant, which we term generically ∑ and ∏ (though we could use for them the X variable meaning a ‘population’) such as:

∑e∆-1=Si and ∏t∆-1=Œ.

In that view ‘∆-Constants’ are ratios of transformation of information and energy in which the 2 essential (Se, Tƒ) parameters of the system remain constant.

For example, the law Pressure x Volume = Constant in physics, where Pressure is a measure of the ‘form’ of the system imposed by an external force, thus it is a function of Tƒ, and Volume is a measure of spatial 3-dimensional shape, and hence an Se value. And so we translate P(Tƒ) x V (Se) = Constant.

This is the Boyle Law: Px V = C. And so it corresponds to a constant of the 1st isomorphism.

*The apparent order of the Universe and its fixed forms arise from the repetition of 2 type of motions: it time cycles and energy, lineal steps: ∑Sp=S, ∑T=O; that is the repetition of energy motions create space distances and the repetition of time cycles forms of information, the simplex ‘constant forms’ observed in reality.*

It follows then that any combination of those elements of relative ‘past-energy’ and ‘future-form’ will create a ‘constant form of present’ or constant of action that exchanges energy and form between the being and other ∆±4 entity. They are the:

5th ‘Iterative Constants of Action’.

IA= ƒ(Sp, Tf)

Iterative dynamic åctions combine flows of energy and information, from the perspective of an I-centered being or ∆o-scale, and other ∆±4 entity, according to the metric of the 5th Dimension, I=SxT, which will give us for each constant a co-invariant proportional quantity.

This is the *definition of any Universal, Vital or Mathematical Constant of action in Nature:*

*Arepetitive, proportional ratio between the Energy and Information of reality enacted by a system of any ∆-scale of reality, which responds to one of the 5 åctions of ‘Existence’, between the being and its relative ∆±4 scales: ∆æ-4, ∆ï-3, ∆e-2, ∆œ-1,and ∆û+1.*

Thus for each species we will find 5 Fundamental, iterative constants of åctions, in which the being will repetitively through its entire existence, create dynamic exchanges of energy and information, and social bondages with similar ∆-systems. And one of the most important feats of ∆-ST is to have found those Universal constants for each scale.

In each particular analysis of each ∆-scientific scale we shall define the main constants of all sciences as particular cases of the∆æ-4, ∆ï-3, ∆e-2, ∆œ-1,and ∆û+1 åctions of each ∆-scale and/or its species.

It is a dynamic order, made of repetitive ‘present åctions’, in which the ∆-centered being, exchanges Temporal Energy,

**RECAP**

The main isomorphisms of nature can be treated qualitatively through the generator equation and quantitative through the constants of the system.

They are the quantitative ‘substance’ of ∆ST and so along the Metric equation and its partial analysis, the 2 essential isomorphisms that connect ∆ST and classic science. Each of those space, time dimensions, scales, planes, and åctions between them must be defined by a Constant.

The main proportional ratios between the elements of the Generator Equation, the vital universal constants of a system, of which the most important depend on which ∆-scale and ternary part belong. Its main ones are:

*S-Constants are*related to the 2 manifold 3-organic, temporal structure of the being, and the ratios between its spherical heads and particles of tall information; , long, hyperbolic, moving limbs and fields (Spe), and wide, iterative, reproductive waves and bodies (ST), parallel to:*T-constants are*related to the 3 ages of time, the young, past, energetic age of max. entropy (Tpe), the steady state, present duration of repetitive frequency åctions (Tdi) and the future, old age of growing in-form-ation, Tfo.- ST-constants are related to the symmetries of the 2 x 3 ST FUNCTIONS AND FORMS of the Space-time Limbs and Fields of energy, Spe, bodies and waves of iteration, ST and Heads, particles of Information, Tƒ, which enact the:
- ∆-constants are mostly related to the 4+i åctions of all beings, as they relate to the different ∆±4 dimensional scales any ∆-centered being inter-acts with: ∆-similar beings: Social Evolution (∆S); ∆-1: Iterative Reproduction (∆œ); I-2: Energy feeding (∆Sp); ∆-3: information gauging (∆ï) and ∆-4: Motion (∆V).

Thus the Order of the Universe is clearly established by those isomorphisms and its qualitative and quantitative order, derived of the common spatial temporal and scalar dimensions of the being, ∆•st, which IN THE 8TH isomorphism will define also the ‘8 formal motions’ of which all beings are made; *that will add the duality of communication and perception, as the 8th type of motion (inward absorption of information to perceive, outward emission to **communicate) *

*The dynamic order of the Universe and its cyclical inertia.*

We conclude that the essential characteristic of the Universe is its ‘order’. Indeed, since reality is made of ‘energetic and informative motions’, lineal space and cyclical time in perpetual transformation, what marvels the observer is the ‘invariance’ of its forms and structure, the isomorphism of its scales, the static appearance of things. The dynamic constancy of reality.

The study of those Universal and Vital constants, the magic numbers in which the ultimate structures of the Universe and Life hold, is thus the main quantitative isomorphism of the Universe.And perhaps one of the less understood themes of science, in terms of its qualitative meaning.

So all elements of reality knowledge requires a qualitative understanding, which is given by ‘General Systems Theory’ (∆ST) and a formal, quantitative one, given by the symmetries and relationships of those constants. What is their meaning and why they have the values they have is one of the key puzzles of science, which scalar space-time answers conceptually and empirically.

It is though a field in which i have not yet completed research. So while the general outline of the origin and meaning of Universal constants is clear, and the main ones have been resolved, the enormous amount of data to process, leaves for future theorists a wealth of elements to resolve.

**IV. FAST SURVEY OF CONSTANTS ACROSS DIFFERENT SYSTEMS.**

In the graph, to fully build up a theory of Universal constants as ratios between different Dimensions of space-time we must start from the beginning – the simplest forms, the ‘irrational numbers’, or ‘vital ratios’ without a perfect, static solution that appear in mathematics, and Einstein rightly considered the ‘first magic numbers’ of the Universe.

**MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL CONSTANTS.**

The first constants are thus mathematical numbers, which are ratios of Spe/tif events. And this also translates into physical constants.

For example πi is merely the ratio between 3 lineal forms of space and its ∆+1 evolution by adding a dimension of height to form a cycle. c is the constant ratio between the distance and curvature of light space-time. Charges and masses are scalar constants, which express a ratio of mass-charge (temporal frequency) to distance-force (attractive field) and so on.

Let us consider the simplest Universal constant:

| < π > O

In this simple ratio 3 forms of space, 3 lines curve to create a cycle of time, by virtue of a curvature function, π, which therefore is the Universal constant most often repeated in all |πO: > transformations of entropy into information, which are an enormous array of physical equations.

A polynomial on base 10 on the other hand will be a sign most often of an ∆-motions, in equations of resonance, herding, reproduction and social evolution.

Finally the golden ratio is a simple process of generation, as in the graph of a bidimensional ‘basic being’, where a+b is the underlying Spe-entropy field that feeds both, a, the body and b the head, generated by a.

Now, Pi is kind’a obvious, phi, is beautiful and beauty, which is the proportional balance of Spe, Tiƒ & ST we will find to be the key to survival (specifically its equation, S=T, harmony of ‘size and form’, ‘energy and information’ ‘body and mind’). Yet the most fascinating of all constants for me, is e, because it is the constant of the ∆-dimension scalar processes. And IT IS OBVIOUSLY FOR THAT REASON, along the imaginary numbers of cyclical time that complete the fractal, cyclical algebraic structure of the Universe, the less understood of them all. So we do have to complete ‘in the future’ on our section of maths, the meaning of its ‘awesome’ properties.

Thus, we can obtain from those regular exchanges, motions, rations and transformations of | , Ø, O, >≈ < functions/flows o space and time. This type of constants, as we are space-time beings carry into:

**Physical Universal constants**

**The main** constants of a PHYSICAL system are divided into active magnitudes, vital internal constants and universal external constants: Å.V.U.C.

The study of the quantitative constants and hence the algebraic equations of the being, which is fundamental to physics. We study the main proportional ratios between the Sp-ST-Tiƒ, elements of the Generator Equation, internally, the vital constants of a system, externally the Universal constants of its world, both connected by the active magnitude or value of the being

Thus 3 are the types of parameters and equations related to the ternary rule of subdivision of those Universal constants:

**– 1.Å: **__Åctive Magnitude (å), this is the scalar number__, most systems use to define the whole. It is the charge of a molecule, the rest mass of a cosmic body, the Z-number of an atom, for the 3 physical ∆±1 scales in its static state.

But obviously for each species and each study is diverse. For example, in America, where the language of valuation is money, this is the ‘credit number’ or fortune of each citizen – all other things dependent on this. And generally as the example shows, this active magnitude is connected to the Œ-isomorphism of the language of value of the world in which the being is: IT IS ITS FACE VALUE, its Tiƒ value in the parameter of information of the larger world. The dominant value, naked. And also the fundamental element of survival (as systems tend to be in balance, S=T, by defining Tiƒ, we often define the Sp x Tiƒ metric existential force of the being).

In the cosmological realm, your mass defines your survival, in a molecule your charge-valence, in an economic society your ‘money’. In a genetic society your ‘surname’. And of this *always the fractal is aware. In the old times, when someone asked you what you were, or rather who you were, you said your kinship, name or tribe, in the modern world you say your profession (as it would be a bit rude on the sense of ‘balance’ to state your wealth, but this is implied by the profession’s salary). So this is the key constant, ∆-1Tiƒ put often in relationship to the total amount of the world, so it is also in physics, the Potential magnitude, the ratio between the Å-ctive magnitude of the being and the total value of the field-world below or above. *

Now again we must realize that the languages of God are infinite, meaning that while no physicist would perhaps accept that Mass and Surname are similar concepts they are both å-ctive magnitudes of the language of cosmology and the language of genetic societies that *resume the value of the being for the whole system, and its master-god, the black hole origin of cosmic mass and the king, master of the tribal nation. So again, the closer your parameter is to that of the central element of the ∆+1 hierarchy, the more value you have, the closer you will be seated at the side of ‘God’ (the Max. Tiƒ point of your ∆+1 world is the definition of God).*

Now associated to this according to duality principles (according to the duality, motion-static form, and | vs. O-motions) we can talk of other key parameters, related to moving active magnitudes, performing | or O cycles. Hence in physics it is the Lorentz Force of a charged molecule or particle (subdivided into its charge and magnetic motions), the momentum of a mass (subdivided in |-lineal momentum and O-angular momentum).

And so happens for particle parameters, in which the quantum numbers perform the same conceptual tasks, further subdivided into 2 x 2 numbers (principal for lineal kinetic energy, secondary for angular momentum, being the spin number for perception and reproduction and the magnetic number for social evolution).

Thus we can see now that departing from an active magnitude, *we can start to find all kind of combined parameters and active constants, once we give motion to the active magnitude and put it to task, performing its 5 canonical actions that give ‘living purpose’ to the being. *

**-2,3,4 ‘V’:** Next we consider a set of 3 ‘Vital Constants’ internal to the being, which relate Tƒ and Sp, and hence are the main parameters of fields-limbs/body-waves and particles-heads.

They write in terms of Tiƒ=1/T, cyclical time or frequency: the inverse of period-duration, T. So we write 2 formats, the classic T- duration equation; and the inverse Tiƒ -frequency equation, which is the one T.Œ uses.

-Se/Tƒ=SxT = density of reproduction of energy And its inverse:

-Tƒ/Se= 1/TxS: density of reproduction of information; or speed of reproduction of the Œ- form in a lower scale (quite obvious for waves, S=T, not so evident for particle-field systems, S>T)

It again does have different jargons in physics, as *most parameters of the fractal,* bidimensional Universe are squares, while in lineal physics, they tend to use one-dimensional parameters. For example, the density of information is closely related to curvature, which in lineal physics at each point of a line is defined to be 1/r, where r is the radius of the osculating, or “kissing,” circle that best approximates the line at the given point. This for the explorer of physical equations is one of the fundamental, albeit cumbersome corrections of most physics, to give it a focused mirror: the transformation of parameters to the proper dimensions of time and space.

Another example is Maxwell’s equation of light speed, c=1√µxe, which in the bidimensional Universe must be therefore squared, to give us the fundamental parameter, c^{2} = 1/µ(sp) x e (Tiƒ). Alas (-; we does have here by the simple procedure of applying the general concepts of T.Œ to a physical formula the understanding of 3 fundamental parameters, µ, the magnetic constant that defines µ as the quanta of energy of the electromagnetic space, eo, the electric constant, which defines it as the informative parameter (or in its inverse lineal time concept, as Ke, the coulomb constant of force of the electromagnetic field), and finally c2, the density of information of light space, which as it happens comes also in a fundamental equation, E=Mc2, or E(sp) < C2 (Tƒ/Sp) > M (Tƒ), which simply states that an entropic field of space-time light, becomes converted into a cyclical vortex of time or mass, through the ratio of conversion of ‘entropy into information’ of our Universe.

And needless to say since we have discovered the meaning of µ, eo, k and M and c2, it will be easy to understand as Ke and G are closely related the meaning of G, when we study the Œ isomorphism of physical systems and define charges and masses unifying them, as the two time vortices of information of the ∆-1 and ∆+1 scales.

Now we can relate also those terms, µ and eo to the normal speed of material waves (concepts of tension and mass of the string that ‘waves’), when dealing with our world.

And all this led us to the understanding of speed of information transmission. It is the most often used constant of the Universe, c-speed, albeit eliminating *the informative parameter of the Tiƒ element, and making it lineal, which we will show to be determinant to misunderstand speed. Since ultimately speed is reproduction of information along a path of motion on a lower, ∆-1 scale. So physicists come to realize that for exampled the c-speed limit is NOT one of mere locomotion but one of ‘reproduction of information and transmission of information’ along the Universe.*

We shall obtain wondrous results as the ∞ relative speed of gravitation, which carries no information or ‘action at distance’, but does carry energy-motion, that is locates forms in space. Why? Simple, we are talking of a density of reproduction of energy NOT of information, carried by the gravitational force. And this process SxT≈Se/Tiƒ= K/o=∞ is a pure action at distance.

The consequences of this will be daring in all the conceptual analysis of all the scales of reality, determining the inverse arrows of the 5^{th} dimension: the larger scales of gravitational forces who do NOT carry internal information are however able to control externally and locate with perfect motions all its lower scales. So when you move your hand, all your lower scales ‘act at distance’ in simultaneity, with infinite synchronicity. But Information does have limits of speed to code and reproduce its forms, in other systems, so genetic informative preproduction is far slower. We say that motion from upper to lower scales carries no information except the motion-distance itself and it is synchronic with no loss of order (entropy in the old jargon), and vice versa, information from lower to upper scales reproduces with no loss (entropy), but has a limited speed.

Or in even more profound metaphysical terms, we say that ‘present’ space co-existence is proper of upper motion scales, the larger spatial action at distance relative pure space motions with no time, but information reproduction implies ‘expenditure of time’, reason why indeed time and information are so closely related, and space and no-time processes of motion and expansion of space are also closely related. From these facts we do obtain the equation of death by entropic expansion in space in no time: Death = max. Sp x Min. T (death happens in a single time quanta) and its inverse, life arrow, Life=Max. Tiƒ x Min. Sp. Life happens in a long time but consumes little information and happens in systems in relative rest motion, specially when the fetus evolves.

Thus we do have the reproduction of energy and the reproduction of information as two different parameters, quite ill-understood in the fog of modern physics (but hinted at in many comments and equations).

– So now we do have the 3^{rd} fundamental physical parameter: Se x Tƒ=S/T, or existential force-potency of the being, all related concepts which basically give us the capacity of the system to interact efficiently with the outer world. I like to call it the Predator Force, as it determines who wins in fights for existence of any kind of species.

In that sense, in biology means to have a perfect head and a perfect body, which defines the top predator. In physics it is often similar to the momentum when we take Tƒ as the active magnitude, and Sp, and the ‘distance-lineal speed’ of the being. And indeed the physical system with maximal momentum survives better in collisions, so black holes that traverse stars with less momentum devour them.

Now those 3 constants are maximized in the ages of the being, in youth, the Maximal spatial value, in old age the maximal density of information, in the mature, adult age, the balanced existential force which gives us the reproductive age of the being, dominating its environment where it seeds its offspring. In physics, they are the ‘stationary points’ of its young, energetic, Max Se, adult Se=Tƒ and max. Tiƒ, ‘stationary points’ of its world cycle or ‘Hamiltonian’ (in physical system) the most important in time.

In physics this set of 3 laws are tremendously important for each species, and for a full description of the system, they must be coupled with the 3 ‘Universal Constants’ of the larger ∆±|2| worlds in which the being exist.

**Definition of Universal constants.**

IN THE GRAPH, we can explain the nature of Universal constants and unify its origin across scales.

Scalar Space Time has a simple, telling answer to this question: they are ratios between the 10 dimensions of each system of the Universe, which can be derived from the ‘metric equations’ of those dimensions.

For example, the fundamental equation Se x Tƒ = ∆, that tell us the size of a system and the speed at which it processes information with its clock-like time cycles is co-invariant.

So the smaller we become, ∇Se, the faster our clocks tick, ∆Tƒ, from rotating black holes turning at c-speed to chips calculating faster through its computer Hertz cycles to atoms rotating much faster than galaxies.

But within a certain family of species that relationship holds ‘invariant’, constant, ∆.

And this is signaled by a Universal Constant.

*‘Planckton’, the minimal space-time unit of the light-universe.*

The most famous of them is the H-Planck Constant, that writes:

Sp x T = h.

It means that the product of the energy and the time clock of a certain particle, called an action, remains constant.

And it is all pervading in Quantum Physics. In ∆ST – the organic paradigm – you can interpret it no longer in abstract terms but in organic terms as the ‘minimal cell’ of space-time of the ∆-scale of light space in which we live.

For that reason we give it a different name, ‘Planckton’. So in the same manner the minimal life cell is often a Plankton, a unicellular plant; all what you see is ultimately made of a bunch of h-plancktons, ‘literally’. Light is the sum of a series of Plancktons and so a photon has an energy Sp= hv, the product of a Planckton and its frequency (the number of them).

Particles are also born in its ‘first’ cycle, from light-space that condensates into the particle, according to the uncertainty principle: Sp x T = h, and the faster the cycle is (∇T), the more energy-space it has (∆Es), but the product of both remains invariant, h.

**Simple physical constants.**

Can we treat other universal constants as pi functions that transform back and forth entropy into information?

Yes, if we consider the same algorithm for the main scales of physical systems such as:

|-E < h-planck > O-ƒrequency for the quantum scale

|-E < k-boltzmann <> O-Temperature for the thermodynamic scale

|-E<c2>O-Mass for the gravitational scale.

So what we observe on those physical scales is the transformation of an entropy-energy arrow into one of time-frequency/information through a constant of action/entropy/speed square which is the transformative < π> factor back and forth, and as such an Ø-present constant of action combination of the other 2.

So, Universal constants are ratios of those transformations, which become all pervading for those who relate the largest possible physical space-time scales (the gravitational, thermodynamic and quantum scales):

In the graph on the left side we can see the different Universal constants as metric and ratios of exchange of energy and information between the 3 main scales of human actions, the gravitational, thermodynamic and quantum scales.

In the graph the equations of the 3 physical scales and its ‘constants of space’:

Est = ∆-2 (quantum scale): Hs x ƒt = Ks x Tt (∆-1: thermodynamic scale)= 1/2 Ms x vt : ∆+i (Gravitational scales)

*How each of those parameters of space-time, constants of space and speed of time cycles, of a 10¹° scale of the Universe emerges in the next scale? *When we transcend scale a function of space emerges as a function of time and one of time as space.

So the quanta of space, h, k, m, varies as we change planes of existence, since the transition between points into superoranisms ‘fogs’ the vision of information along more than one scale. Closer and hence more accurately observed there is the thermodynamic scale with k, the unit of entropy as the quanta of space and temperature, the vibration of motion of molecules, or its ‘cyclical thermodynamic clocks’ as the unit of motion in time, and its product energy.

Finally in the gravitational scale, the quanta of space is ‘mass’ (which of course must be combined with the dilatation of ‘temperature’, and the underlying ‘extension’ of space-time ‘h-light quanta’). All in all mass (not necessarily matter) and more often ‘momentum’, which ads to mass speed, might be consider the quanta of space, which the different motions of those masses, of which angular and lineal speed are the commonest ones, give us even closer analysis of some of the features of physical systems of space-time.

It is quite interesting to make some deep philosophical thoughts about the last paragraph – the fact that mass and speed *change their functions when we move from ∆+3, galactic space to ∆+4, cosmological space. So mass which is fixed in value at ∆+3, becomes close to c-speed, in the fringe of the galactic organism (at its membrane and nuclei).*

Now, again we must refer to the general structure of fractal space-time points, when fully constructed as functional ternary super organisms. It will then have a simple ternary structure with its membrane fine-tuned and synchronized sensorially to its singularity. Yet for the enclosed territorial vital space, or body-wave system, those 2 ‘invisible’ unreachable limits of maximal information (singularity) and maximal energy (enclosure), determines the limits of ‘energetic speed’ and ‘density of information’ of the system, *which as long as it is within the membrane and singularity cannot colder/superfluid in its informative density-mass, than the center, and have a harder, faster, simultaneous, longer constant of space than the surrounding membrane.*

This means as each scale will find a perfect ‘frozen’, efficient particle-head, and body-wave to ensemble a dominant super organism in practical terms that each scale will be populated from the perspective of its minimal space-quanta *by what was the maximal space quanta of its ∆-1 scale, which then becomes in the upper scale the entropic unit.*

Yet as the ∆-1 scale maximal space quanta, by the law of balance, S=T, will be also the max. S xT, as it turns out it is the top predator element on the lower scale which sets the constant parameters of the upper scale. And so the function of this ‘being’ changes from ∆-1, Top Predator vital being, to ∆-space, entropic cell of the larger whole.

And this brings a long way our understanding of the 3 previous constants h, k, m and how as we focus in larger scales, their role transmutes from active to passive System.

**II. SCALAR CONSTANTS OF ACTION: THE 10 GAMES OF THE UNIVERSE**

**III. PHYSICAL CONSTANTS**

**IV. BIOLOGICAL CONSTANTS.**

Biological constants are both topological in space, structuring the form of living systems and dynamical in time, defining the vital ratios and balances of the organism

**V. SOCIAL, HUMAN SYSTEMS.**

(to be cont’ed)