“The languages of god are infinite’ upanishads
To be or not tº exi=±st, that is the equæstion W.L.S.
‘Do not confuse motion with Action.’ Hemingway .
‘The function of existence is combination of yin-formation and yang-entropy which combine to create the ³10 exi beings’
5 DIMENSIONAL DUST OF SPACE TIME, ‘DO EXIST’
∆º exi±st as a function of actions.
The Universe is a game of ‘Doers’, ∆º minds that do observe the Universe through its attached body of energy, a flow of time, ∆-1≤∆+1 and information ∆+1≥∆-1, balanced constantly on an inner and outer, ∆- and ∆+ world and Universe.
If we define the following motions of time:
Entropy: Death into Space: ∆+1<<∆-1
Time Singularity; emerging seed: ∆-1<<∆+1
We define in that sense, the inner world, ∆º-i vs. the outer world ∆º+i as the essential first division of the existential function, which can then be mathematised as a cycle or membrane that closes an inner and outer world, and do exist by letting energy and information, e x i transit between its inner and outer world of existence.
This is the game, as existential functions we are a membrane with an angular momentum, given by its inner density and outer motion of the past-future related topologies of space – we are the membrane of an open ball, communicating with the Universe, were are pis, ∑ πis of existence; fluid ensembles of time cycles knotted into a crystal mind, a point of complexity only perceived in full from its still mind mirror of the Universe:
In the graph bosonic minds vs. spatial fermions, establish a first general evolution across ∆ (bosons) or ST, fermions, which therefore becomes an expanded polar flow, as OPPOSED TO HE HIERARCHICAL SINGLE ANTI-DEATH ARROW OF BEINGS IN A BOSONIC STATE WHICH TRY CONSTANTLY TO INCREASE ∆, not to die as a §ocial knøt.
Abstract Regardless of the dogmas of modern science, which accepts only mathematics as the language of God (Galileo, Hilbert,etc), and gives anthropomorphic qualities (perception≈informative properties, life-vital-biological≈survival properties) only to human beings and the like, hiding those clear ‘ego-trips’ of human superiority with elaborated dogmas, easily believed (as the ego is above knowledge), from religion to science, reality objectively speaking makes us equal to all other beings, made of the same substances and behaviours, only different in quality not in quantity.
Thus the Universe and all its parts do have sentient=apperceptive, informative capacities, ruled by an ∆º point-mind or singularity of information, which controls with different languages a body of energy and information, e x i , which exchanges energy and information with an external upper and lower, scale of space-time, ±St. So of the many ways we write the logic generator of space-time beings, one of my favourites is the ‘function of existence’:
∆º (mind- particle/head exchanging…) = e x i (energy and information with its body-wave over) ± st (an outer world and inner world of space-time in which the organism exists)
To exist, ∆º=exi±st, exi=st¡ence are similar acronyms we use often in this blog, even if the use of ‘words’ given the one-dimensional dogmatic way in which humans perceive reality won’t be easily accepted. But this blog does not follow the ‘paradigm of dogma, truth and measure’, which passes today as science, but the concept of a fractal, homologic, repetitive Universe, where given the simplicity of its fundamental principles, the beauty is in the homologic, metaphoric repetition of similar patterns in all beings. And of those patterns the most important is the ‘actions’ of survival that systems display to ‘exist’, that is the needed constant actions of exchange of energy and information, absorbtion of entropy-motion and emission of repetitive patterns of information, to make the system survive beyond death.
Those actions is the theme of this post – the program of existence, all systems follow in order to survive, which we resume in the previous acronym, and in a mnemonic 5 vowel system of action: entropy motions or ‘A-celerations’, e-nergy feeding, i-formative reproduction and communication, o-ffspring (reproduction) and social evolution from individual into Universals. To exist, thus is to perceive and gauge information about energy sources where to feed or reproduce, and move towards those sources, often with similar close beings, in herds and social organisms, stronger than the individual.
The function or program of existence is thus a program of survival which unifies all systems, not only in its ternary forms in space, ages in time and scales of co-existence, but in the way they behave to continue that existence. What humans bring to the table as special is not perception, perhaps self-consciousness of being apperceptive species, due to the self-reflection of the verbal language. But as Leibniz put it, not all humans are truly conscious of being, neither things should be so unconscious of existence. So he coined the term apperception, which we often use here as the automatic, vegetative or reflective perception and gauging of information needed to survive that all systems perform.
“The universe is a fractal of spacetime that re=produces supœrganisms of energy=entropy x information”.
This simple sentence encodes the meaning of all systems of reality, made of 3 topological space-time forms/functions, energy, entropy and information, structured across a series of scales of different size and speed of its time clocks:
In the graph, the Universe is a fractal that reproduces information. We can see that as any fractal, its structure is discontinuous, made of multiple scales of size, and self-similar in the network form of those scales, and homologous for any ‘stience’ of space-time. Even motion can be described as the reproduction of the information carried by a wave of form as modern physics shows (wave-particle duality, where the particle in motion is only seen as a wave that reproduces its information and relativity, where a light speed is a speed of transmission, hence reproduction of information along the wave path).
Yet to fully understand the fractal, organic Universe we must truly ‘re-start’ the fundamental concepts of the Universe from its beginnings as Einstein and Leibniz wanted. This is the purpose of the fractal paradigm, which unfortunately cannot be completed by physicists, with its dogmas of a single space-continuum and a single time arrow. Since the fractal Universe has infinite scales of relative size, and three arrows of time, whose forms and functions co-exist in organic systems across several of those scales.
The Universe is a ‘self-reproductive’ fractal of information with a fractal feed-back generator equation of three arrows of time-space, whose motion in time and form in space, come together to create the infinite fractal ternary beings of reality:
∆-1 Spe: Spatial, Lineal/planar past entropic limbs/fields/territories ≤ ∆º Space-Time: Hyperbolic, re=productive, Present energetic body-wave/working class> ∆+1 Tiƒ: Temporal, cyclic/spheric Future Informative particles-heads.
In this logic, fractal generator equation we have encoded truly the meaning of reality, whose complexity will be born of the repetition, variation and ensemble in larger ‘∆-scales’ of wholeness of the infinite beings made of those 3 elements of time, symmetric to the 3 forms of topological space, extended across three relative size of ‘hilomorphic smaller substances – atoms, cells, citizens’ which form whole organic systems (matter, organisms, societies), part of a larger whole ecosystem (solar systems, planets and galaxies, nations, civilisations, world cultures)..
To that aim we must first define time&information on one side, and space& entropy on the other, the 2 ‘elements’ of reality, which are part of an organic, fractal reality of relative scales of size and time clocks that co-exist together into the 5th dimension of scalar space-time.
And once the key concepts embedded on it are properly clarified, we shall write a Logic Feed-back generator equation of scales of space and time Γ(∆i; Se; Tƒ), the function of existence:
As all languages/mirrors of any type of mind, ∆º, can perceive the function, or else it would not enact it in its world cycles; it should not surprise the reader that ‘genetic linguistics’ by homology, as the origin of our ‘mathematical symbols’, reflects also its intimate meaning as an acronym.
So we shall show how by iteration, the generator both in verbal=temporal and mathematical=spatial can reproduce and evolve all physical, biological and social systems of Nature.
In the graph we show that ‘final key element of reality’ the scalar fifth dimension, ab ∆, of all universal systems, co-existing in 3 scales:
Why we need the second arrow of information to complete our models of the Universe; if we are doing so ‘well’ with the details provided by our mechanical instruments of perception and measure, and the logic models of computers where we feed them; should be obvious to the reader – while the gathering of data and study of the details of reality has been ginormous thanks to modern technology, the final icing in the cake of science, the building of synoptic models not with maths but with logic, which can summarise and resume it all in simple concepts of enormous range of application is lacking precisely because science today lacks what we shall provide in this blog – the ultimate essence, the great principles embedded in the three arrows of time, its functions and symmetries with the three topologies of space, and its co-existing organic structure along 3 ∆±1 scales of size – all together put into a whole system by an organising apperceptive ‘linguistic monad’ which regardless of his language and/or simplicity – consciousness and self-reflection obviously should appear only in the more complex mental forms – do exist from matter systems self-centred in growing crystals to galaxies self-centred in gravitational black holes, to ant-hills self-centred in pheromonal queens to societies self-centred in government corps.
Humans reduce reality to simple mathematical, measurable statements and reserves vital properties to similar species.
So we shall make a brief history of thought from subjective human centres of reality to the wholeness of it, which shares all human properties with matter, soon. But we have already lay down the elements of all beings, ∆ºst, scales, minds space and time ternary symmetries; so you can continue or leave. Know though you are just Dust of space-time and ∆ºst you will become.
Departing from those facts, the interest for you of this post depends on what are your goals in knowledge and science. If you require mere praxis, truth can be perfectly approximated by computer modelling & statistical and probabilistic models without knowledge of the inner workings of causality caused by the ‘constant interference’ and mixing of the 2 arrows of time, entropy and information and its ternary combinations into energy ‘body-wave’ systems. All this IS knowledge of the ‘thoughts’ of God not its details and praxis of science does NOT need it. An example will suffice. Copernicus revolution put the sun in its center and simplified the equations of Ptolemy but it was rejected for long for 3 reasons:
- In a relative Universe, Complexity can always replicate the simpler ‘Ockham truth’ of proper causality, with more ‘complicated’ ad ons and approximations. In Ptolemy case, epicycles and extants made in fact the model far more precise than the Copernican circular orbits, and it was not till Newton’s simple formula that it became established BOTH as simpler and more accurate. Today the ‘added’ complexity of ad hoc Ptolemy’s epicycles is even easier to implement with computer modelling, which alway looks so ‘real’ and can use all kind of Algorithms of information (Ab.A.I.) to approximate truth and obtain practical results. Yet those who seek the simplicity of truth did love Copernican simplicity putting the sun in the right place and will love the simplicity achieved by adding the proper arrows of time to the mix.
- Humans are an astounding ego-centered species who tends systematically to deny the objectivity of science that puts us outside the center of the Universe in the case of Copernicus, and further aways from its relative scalar center in the case of duality. The ego also works in favor of complexity as scholars like to feel ‘they are high popes’ talking in Latin and you need to be very learned to peer those secrets.
- The very cyclical inertia of knowledge make theories stand for very long even if we know they are wrong. As the burden of undoing and redoing memorial experiences is seldom met. So we still follow religious and cultural routines we know are meaningless, and we still put the negative sign on electrons, regardless of their positive motion; and so on. Thus huge scientific revolutions that completely touch all sciences, as those regarding the nature of space and time, which those texts upgrade, are met with the maximal resistance.
In that regard, Einstein had the right attitude in search of the thoughts of God but without a second arrow of cyclical time, he could not complete the task. It is important though to remember in the XXI century of ‘digital thought’ and ‘computer models of reality’, with an astounding degree of data in the details of the Universe, that besides the trees there is behind a huge ‘wholeness’, the forest; that behind the details and its exhaustive analysis there is a larger, simpler order, as ‘god is simple and not malicious’ A.Einstein.
THE MINDS THAT RULE EXISTENCE: ∆º
The universe is commanded by mirror symmetries of minds of space-time, we can approximately represent with cartesian coordinates, in hyperbolic cylindral or polar form:
the singularity mirror or mind plays a mental mirror in the control of the game of existence.
So to know what the mirror plays is to know the game.
INTRODUCTION: EXPANDING THE PARADIGM OF SPACE-TIME DIMENSIONS
Most scientists think as a century ago, when the new r=evolution of physics – quantum and relativity – was about to start; that the field of space-time theory was closed and yet it was only the beginning…. Today the same feeling seems to be common among scientists. And yet it is only the beginning.
The problem of scientific r=evolutions (Kuhn) is ultimately the relativity of the Universe and the arrogance of man, which do not mix well. The Universe is infinite and it hosts infinite information; but man is limited by its mind, to fit all that Universe in a linguistic mapping. In a simple equation we could write: O-Mind x ∞-Universe = Constant world. But as we only see the mind-world, we tend to confuse it with the whole, and think it is all.
And this trend has if anything increase as we added the digital mind of computers, with its nice models of reality. So we feel, as computers now can model any complex reality that, as Vatican priests when modelling planets with Ptolemy and its epicycles, because adding more complex equations we ‘see’ a computer model, we know it all.
Then there is the routine, the memorisation of all texts, the scholarship, the self-importance of academic positions, based in what was already known – never on new discoveries. Of all this I am fully aware, reason why i know the difficulty the content of this blog would have to become standard science. Since the theme so new, yet so old and extensive – as it deals with the most important elements of all science, the understanding of the Universe with 2 arrows=directions of future, not only the entropic arrow of physicists, but also the biological arrow of information, and its combinations – that word we constantly use but none fully understand, the 3rd arrow of the Universe, energy – that it will change forever the way humans understand the Universe.
Time indeed has 3 arrows:
Entropy, which we define in a more inclusive form as ‘expansive disorder in space’ (as in a big-bang in a dissolving death, in a fast, lineal motion), which is the only one treated formally by physics, as they have been in the business of making ‘entropic weapons’ and ‘heat machines’ for so long, it was the first arrow they came across.
Information, which we all know is there, but as it was defined loosely by Darwin in his theory of evolution of ‘form’, of in-form-ation, differently than in physics, by Shannon, constrained by the dogma of entropy to analyse only its transmission through lineal waves, NOT its formal, Dimensional CONTENT, which is what in-form-ation means; languishes without a unifying understanding of it.
And finally its combination, Energy; which we do not know what truly is, as it happens all over in all systems of nature, too many to have a clear concept of it but of which we have a formula: motion of a mass, of a form; hence combination of entropy and information.
We shall thus construct a much more ordered, clean, simple, understandable Universe with those 3 arrows.
There is though another handicap, in as much as physics uses equations first and paramount, so this reduces the generalisation of its concepts. Indeed, the only equation of entropy it has belongs to the world of heat, a chemical reaction, and as physicists are bad conceptual philosophers they have not expanded the concept well. On the other hand each discipline tries to become on top – remember men are self-centred minds that confuse its mind-knowledge with all. So there is another difficulty here to fully grasp it all with those 3 simple concepts, as they have different evolution through Nature and its beings. And so it might seem impossible to fit it all in a single ternary equations with the arrows of time. And yet, that is the first thing that will astonish you: we can reduce all systems of Nature to a simple equation of the 3 arrows of time and its symmetries with the 3 organs of space that make up all beings. And soon we will show what we mean.
Next comes the ‘other great forgotten’ truth about the Universe, which again confronts the ‘ego of the human being’: the fact reality is structured in scales of different scales of spatial size, from particles to galaxies (in the known known Universe), from molecules to societies (in the human one); and as humans think to be the centre of it all, we really only care that much for our scale, and reject the idea, however evident that all the scales relative. And they are connected by simple laws relating those 3 arrows of time. For example, smaller scales turn faster clocks, which carry more information – and here we see the first great revolution of calling information what really is: dimensional form. Thus information is related to the cyclical form of clocks of time, which store the information of the Universe, according to the speed of those clocks, which as we said, paradoxically are faster in smaller cycles, as in computers or atoms, from logic circuits to spins. And vice versa, bigger things are dumber, they are slower but have more ‘spatial entropy’, they are stronger and can disorder any smallish system with its force. You see, we are playing now with the 3 arrows of time, and the 5Dimension of scales of space, and start to see new relationships hardly explored by present sciences.
Those are the 3±∆ elements we will need to reorganise and explain in a much more orderly, meaningful, architectonical way all the laws of science. How long mankind will take to accept a revolution of this size, unlike nothing has happened in a century? Slowly and perhaps never.
LS, philosopher of science.
Absolute relativity: 0-minds in ∞ universes
0-Minds-Souls: All systems have a central or upper knot – a zero point – that processes information and perceives a ‘still’, pixelled map of reality constructed as a reflection of the external universe – a mind.
In the graph, in the old paradigm of single space-time, there is only a point of view, the anthropomorphic point of view, and a language and frame of reference, the Cartesian frame. In the new paradigm, each knot of cycles of energy and information creates its own frame of reference and coordinates, ‘literally’ as it evolves its organism along an up (information) down (energy) axis, an anteroposterior axis, (direction of motion as it performs its ‘cyclical actions’), and a width axis of reproduction and cellular storage.
Further on, besides its 3 relative, ‘diffeomorphic’ coordinates, each organic system will have a perception based in a language, which might not be the language of man, as each species codes and maps reality with bits of a different type of wave. All this is formalized with a new mathematical model, based in the new discoveries of fractal non-Euclidean geometry, developed by the author that complete the work of Riemann on the subject.
In the graph, the first act of a mind is to perceive and as such it will try to maintain its perception in order by projecting its order into the world, so once the being perceives as a mind, it enacts conservative actions to allow it to keep perceiving. And so the mere existence of linguistic mind-mapping makes necessary the creation of a fractal, territorial order around each of those mind-points. So the mind if it can ‘move’, it will use ‘its energy’, to remain ‘a focused mirror’; since as long as they perceive, they will subtly mirror what they ‘perceive’ as both the right universe and their own mind, and feel ‘entitled’ to ‘evolve’ from dust into ∆ûST.
This same concept applies to social groups of points, which will become parts of larger social wholes naturally as network are more efficient than individuals. So while the will to run through the steps of topological evolution needed to emerge into a higher ∆+1 scale of the 5th dimension is bio-logical, responding to the strategies of association and survival that ensure the system to continue, the procedure is topological and can be described departing from the rules that ensemble point into waves and bio-topo-logical planes.
It is this merging of geometry and biology what has always been underlying phenomena of evolution but are hardly recognised by both disciplines.
Points with parts are knots of time cycles that gather into networks. The most important point of any network is the point which communicates all other points and networks, taking the key decision of any super-organism: which action performs at each moment. That point, is therefore the point that possesses the will of the whole organism.
In the graph, because a Cartesian graph (left) is an abstract continuum of lineal time, based in the single rhythm of a mechanical clock and a continuous space of points with no ‘breath’ (Euclidean definition of a point), ever since it became the canonical representation of space-time science has believed in a single, absolute time and a single absolute space, with a single point of view, that of the human mind in the origin of coordinates. Yet the Cartesian plane only represents the continuous space-time of ‘the membrane of light’ it represents with its 3 perpendicular coordinates, equivalent to the height=electric field, width=magnetic field and length=wave speed of light. Since light is the space we see and so its 3 coordinates are self-similar to those of the Cartesian, human mind made with light.
The real Universe has ∞ points of view that gauge information in ∞scales of space-time. Those points of view by definition have volume to fit ∞ parallels – flows of energy and information that go through them. Each of those parallels is in fact a cyclical, curved trajectory (Einstein’s definition of a parallel); and so we can consider each Non-Euclidean point of view a knot of time cycles with form and motion.
The new 5 postulates of a Non-Euclidean, fractal geometry of Multiple Spaces and Times are:
1st Postulate: ‘A fractal point is a world with an inner content of information that creates its 3 internal, topologic, organic dimensions and a content of energy that traces its external motions=time arrows’
2nd Postulate: ‘A line is a wave of fractal points.’
3rd Postulate: ‘2 fractal points are self-similar when their external, spatial perimeter or their inner information is equal. Similar points form organic networks by sharing their energy and information. Dissimilar points ab=use each other in Darwinian relationships’
4th Postulate: ‘A plane is a network that joins points through waves of energy and information.’
5th Postulate: ‘Non-Euclidean points perceive energy and information: A fractal point has inner apertures to the world, through which multiple waves of energy and information can cross.’
The first postulate defines a point with form and energy. Points are not ‘points with no breath’ (Euclid), an abstract definition that created the simplified concept of a space-time continuum but ‘fractal points’, which grow in size when we come closer to them. And so stars are points in the sky that become huge as we come closer to them. And a microscope discovers an entire world in the minimal size of a cell. Einstein offered a partial solution to this conundrum considering that from our scale of size, those Non-E points seem to curve the information of the universe that fluxed on it.
But Leibniz had given a better answer: ‘the smallest point is a world in itself’. This is the meaning of a fractal point, whose internal parts respond to the 3 topologies of a 4-dimensional Universe: a hyperbolic, informative system; an energetic, planar or spherical membrane and a cyclical, toroidal region with reproductive organs. And we shall find those 3 topological regions in all points-species of the Universe.
It is now clear that non-Euclidean points are points of view that gauge information and move their complementary body with a will, seeking for more energy and information and reproduction, seeking for an organic will to repeat their cycles and motions. And this will gives the point the category of mind, or Atman or soul, a perceptive point of view that absorbs information and moves its body accordingly after ‘thinking’ the information and ‘bending’ it subjectively to its will.
That we have no free will but we have will is the deepest consequence of stating that all points of view search for its 3+1 dimensions of existence, its energy, informative, reproductive and social arrows.
To do so the point must perceive and gauge. If it is an electron it will gauge and move to capture energy to structure its form (2nd quantum number) and it will use a language of information to evolve socially (magnetic number). Points thus are moved by the need to perform their 4 cycles of existence, a desire to acquire more energy and form which they better achieve in networks, with the flexibility of herd hunting and network thinking. But in each scale of reality there is a rational point of view calculating its strategies to get more energy and form.
Networks are made of relative points with form and motion, which can be defined as time cycles – trajectories traced by an entity in search of energy, information, reproduction or social interaction. Those time cycles enclose a surface of vital space or energy and so they define a certain space-time. Any entity will however trace many cycles in search of its organic motions to feed, gauge, reproduce and evolve socially into bigger networks.
So each entity will be a knot of multiple time cycles.In the formalism of Systems sciences we call them Non-Euclidean points, since they are points through which infinite flows of energy (parallels) and information can cross. We also represent them with the symbol ‘i’, which is the next vowel to the A-ristotelian, E-uclidean paradigm, the symbol of information and a visual image of the 2 components of the point, the informative, cyclical part, o, and the lineal, energetic one, |, which we call the body and head of a biological Point; or the field and particle of a physical point (Principle of Complementarity).
The universe is made of networks of such i-points, and each network is what we call a world or discontinuous space-time, st, unit of a bigger fractal network, a new st-point in itself. So a network of particles becomes an atom, which becomes an st-point of a molecule and so on till creating the Universe.
Even humans can be studied as Non-E points, in which each head is indeed a spherical point that communicates energy and information with other humans, forming social networks.
The anthropomorphic reader might think that humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that all points obey in their actions and communicative flows within a network the same laws: humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds; the geometries of social groups are also the same; and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on energy and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. Thus the laws of networks become the social, organic, reproductive why of all beings of the Universe: the Universe reproduces information and organize forms socially into networks.
From magnetic and electric fields, made of magnetic and electric constants that mix and reproduce a light wave to fundamental particles, quarks and electrons that absorb energy and reproduce new quarks and electrons, to energetic males and informative females that reproduce together, all in the Universe can be described with the formalism of networks, connects the why with how and when of the 3rd paradigm of metric measure that has analyzed those networks, its motions and forms in detail. Why those i-points with an ego-driven will that desires selfishly more energy and information and self-reproduction collaborate in herds, becoming parts of a whole has to do with the complexity by which the arrow of social evolution impose systems to its parts. Parts become enslaved by their dependency to the higher energy and information provided by networks.
5th postulate: Paradox of Galileo – definition of ego-soul: fractal P.O.V.
All minds, including man, are self-centered beings that believe to be the center of creation, because they gauge information from its point of view. Yet most of reality either exists in a dark space the species doesn’t perceive or uses a language the species doesn’t decode or it is further away from our ‘noses’ to be of any importance to us. This explains anthropomorphism and the incapacity of man to perceive himself as just another knot of simplex and complex actions of energy and time.
The laws of those Points of view that gauge information, are Laws of Non-Euclidean geometries. The formalism of General Systems Sciences, which studies networks of points of view is therefore Non-Euclidean. Regarding its Logic structure, past, present and future become relative concepts and so the ‘logic’ of the Universe in which past, present and future co-exist in simultaneous space-time fields, is different, is paradoxical, dual… Its formalism can be fusioned with that of Non-Euclidean geometry in what we call illogic geometry, the linguistic foundations of all General systems.
The paradox of the ego: linguistic points of view.
Perception is possible because of the mentioned paradox of Galileo: all is motion, and so informations are cycles of time with curved motions and energy-space are sheets of lineal motion. And so because all is motion, the repetition of those motions is in fact a simple reproduction that takes place in simple atomic particles (with cyclical vortex of motion) or lineal fields of energy (with wave-like motions).
The paradox of Galileo is again a fundamental law of the relativity Universe ill-understood by scientists who ‘see’ still pictures of reality with their instruments and seek for ‘substances’ instead of motions. It is also the key to the 8th key principle of G.S.Theory, the paradox of the ego.
All individual systems perceive or process information with their linguistic or geometric minds; using that information to guide their body towards fields of energy in which they feed.
Yet since resources are limited, to achieve those 2 simplest arrows of existence, all systems prey in the energy and information of other species causing their death in Darwinian, preying events. We thus talk of two ethical arrows in a universe of limited resources.
Top predator individual species will try to obtain energy from their environment absorbing it from species with weaker energy bodies and informative heads, provoking Darwinian, predatory relationships, causing their death in Darwinian, preying events.
And they will perceive the universe from their egoistic point of view, as a static dead space, of which they are the center. Since from their subjective perspective, their nose seems bigger than the Andromeda galaxy and the earth seems quiet surrounded by infinitesimal stars.
Yet objectively, the ego is just an infinitesimal, fractal mirror, reflecting a minimal part of the infinite information of the whole without which it will cease to exist.
It is the paradox of the selfish ego that wants to be the center of the universe. The paradox of the ego is the main cause of extinction of all species, which as the human beings are unable to respect the infinity and power of the whole and consider themselves special sons of god, entitled to control and destroy nature, till the Newtonian laws of action reaction, extinguish them. Thus we define each of the infinite Aristotelian Gods, center of a surface of energy they move and prey on:
‘Every point of view=mind feels the center of the Universe, but it is only an infinitesimal Non-Euclidean point that stores a limited mapping of reality with its informative languages.’
We are all Atmans, informative CPUs, souls that gauge in different languages reality, to construct a mental mapping that caters to our point of view and arrows of time. So we create our ‘perceived Universe’ – a fact known from Descartes to Schopenhauer, but lost to ‘naïve, realist’ physicists. All of them thinking clocks are the only point that matters to measure time, and the human mind, the only ego that knots energy into form, since that is the only perspective they perceive. That is why most of history, humans thought the Earth to be the center of reality; and still think they are the only intelligent species.
Conclusion: The importance of the 5 postulates of Non-AE.
The importance and reason of making the 5 postulates of i-logic the centrepiece of the formalism of ¬æ should be now evident to the reader: in the process of topological growth from a single point of view, into a topological plane, which in itself will be a ternary being mess of 3 topologic networks (the entropic, ‘digestive’, energetic, ‘blood-reproductive’ and informative, ‘nervous systems), unlike normal abstract geometry in which the point merely becomes a line that forms a plane, with another line, the fractal point with parts, through which infinite parallels can cross, starts a game of social evolution, reproduction and exchange of energy and information with other points that will finally create networks that will develop into living ternary space-time organisms, in a process much more imprecise, chaotic, filled with trial and errors, interrupted by other entities, etc. etc. but perfectly describable with the logic rules of vital topology, which will surprisingly enough when studied in depth and considered the ‘foundational postulates’ of non-AE mathematics and logic will develop a quite accurate description of the events that compose a world cycle and the parts that create an organism.
It is then the 3rd postulate which Schopenhauer rightly criticised for not being self-evident, as the 5th (if we indeed take parallels as straight lines), which becomes also along the 5th postulate that defines a mind, and illogic temporal postulate also, as it gives the rule, obtained from practical view, and the converted into formal theorems, of engagement of beings, according to the different similarity of its 3 parts, of which externally obviously only the membrane, and depending on distance, as a mere point, will be observed.
IN THE GRAPH the languages of god are ∞ (upanishads), humans also use a verbal language, which mimics the elements of the fractal generator, which for that reason we express also in words.
Now we give a step further in the ‘search’ for self-similarities between all languages, reducing the expression of the fractal generator to a verb:
To exi≈st is the verbal expression of the generator, where the 3 elements of the generator acquire a verbal mode.
So instead of Spe > St>Tiƒ, we express the ternary symmetry in terms of a singularity, or To, a body-wave of entropy and form, mixed into energy and information, and a Space-time field from where the body extracts its foms
So , to describe the actions that from the point of view of a mind-singularity, to, perceive a body-wave, of entropy and information, exi ≈ riding as a space-time being of energy a field that sustained it. Tº≤ex i ≈ st
You can imagine those 3 parts, singularity, T•, body-wave: e x i, the most dynamic part, and below the world extended as a balanced space-time field in which the body and head co-exist together. The being in fact is more often defined as an exiTº a body-head, wave-particle duality and the field is detached of it. IN THE particle-field, though the description is To=st, as you see, each possible combination of those 3 elements starts the combinatorics of what we shall call in the ‘philosophy of science’, which is the verbal mode of GST, the…
Æ: EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.
FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE:
We call existential algebra the study of the 3 time arrows and how they combine for beings to exi=st,
Now the simplest of those configurations is the ± head-body-field beat of motion (>field<body<head) and perception (Head>Body<Field), whereas the wave state moves the being and the particle state stops and makes it perceive, or starts a seed of a next generation.
To exist imply to make combinations of arrows of time, which I call ‘tensors’ of existence as they come from the function, and its ternary symmetries.
And the question of how many events are allowed To exi=st is the first question of algebra of existence, which we formalise with a mix of conceptual logic verbal thought and classic equations as we go along translating the meaning of the common function of mathematics, the language that better reflects the structure and events of space-time beings.
Actions are thus evident once we realise we just start algebra with simple combinatorics, of 3±∆ elements, often associated to a few mathematical numbers notably 4 constants, π, the constant of cycles, phi & e the constant of inner and outer growth & 10, the social constant; along the number for the whole 1 and for the infinitesimal, 0 and the bidimensional number of a motion in time from entropy to information, i.
∫ e x i SURVIVAL ACTIONS ≈ ∑A,E,I,O,U
Stience studies only what ∃xists, ‘functions of existence’.
But what makes something to exist as opposed to not? What are the rules of creation of beans and conservation of them? What is the program of survival of species once created, to endure in the Universe?
THIS THE HUGE VITAL PART OF THE UNIVERSE – THE FACT THAT THE ABSTRACT LAWS OF BEHAVIOR AND GROWTH IN TIME AND SPACE can be reduced to a series of survival actions, performed from a point of maximal information or dimensional mind of the system. We can talk of a Universe of vital organic systems, made of dust of space-time, seen inwards also as complex systems, fluctuating, traveling through scales of existence but seemingly all performing the same game, the function of survival, ∃, which determines all what is stience, that is all functions in which there is at least one form in existence, normally described by the generator and its ternary symmetries:
∃ sπecies ≈ Γst¡
becomes then the existential function of any form or being, which will follow the generator ternary topologies of the formalism of GST. All is within the formal description of an ‘inflationary language’, which in fact we shall reduce further by experience into what it is real.
So a huge part of any system is to have a mind which understands the game of existence and allows the system to play it and survive.
Thus what physicists likely would deny we consider a tenant of truth: The UNIVERSE IS FILLED WITH MAXWELLIAN DEMONS ORDERING REALITY.
HOW THEY DO IT? With different ‘intelligences, which however share an evolutionary ‘survival function’ embed in all of them, Œ, the organic function of existence, the strategy of survival we call the LEGO game of the Universe, the Generator game of super organisms.
This is what the Universe does: Superorganisms departing from ∆-1 finitesimal dust of space and time, integrated in time and space through networks which all finally create superoganisms.
The mind is NOT that game though, it is a different less vital thing – a still mapping of reality and algorithms of survival, action-oriented attached to the mapping.
The answer is that present reality is made of actions of entropy and time, which therefore need both to exist, but mind stiences are pure information, and its existence. if real, would form the substrata of all other scales. But in the existence we give it to this sheet of information is provided forcefully by the author’s mind with a minimal bias…So we do NOT talk of mental existences as we talk of astrophysical, biological or sociological systems whose functions of existence are obviously real.
WE MUST REMEMBER THIS: STIENCE IS ONLY CONCERN WITH WHAT EXISTS AND IS REAL (EINSTEIN).
So departing from this law, the function of existence
AND ALL its symmetries and generators is the origin seed of information that gives birth when ‘restricted’ by the limits of energy – boundaries of the problem, to a limited number of integral space and time solutions.
The finding of integrals thus means the finding of solutions in the emergence of a larger scale of a function of existence.
How we consider a function? Through its motions of time, which give us functions with often just 3+0 variables, to give us a complete description of such motions. For the simplest informative space-time, that of the Euclidean + time duration 4D holographic Universe humans observe, it is easy to craft a simple bidimensional language to translate its actions:
So with geometry and the analytic geometry and algebra, we can describe the same game we have been describing here in conceptual terms. It follows that the mathematical language will follow in its algebra, just translations to the mathematical language of the main laws and isomorphisms of 5D space-time.
Abstract. We can observe ceteris paribus in time the structures of the Universe as a game of frequencies of world cycles (ab.∏). We can observe it ceteris paribus in space as a simultaneous, §upœrganism (ab.œ), this ∏.œ. beings however can be observed in more detail as fractal points performing constantly space-time actions of exchanges of energy and information, the ‘derivatives’ of its worldcycle when plotted in a graph of space-time coordinates:
The universal ‘algorithm’ of existence is a rather simple function: Max. ∑ e x i ds dt, which encodes the point of balance and immortality of any system of the Universe. Its study is the essential element of Ælgebra (existential algebra), the i-logic, mathematical model that develops the rules for that function to be defined in the domain of any space-time being. Certain domains will not host the function and do not exist. There are many jargons to express this truth.
I found the simplest and more telling to be the one of the title: e x i | s≈t, whereas the 3 parts of the system, its ∆-1 spatial background, its e xi body-wave ∆- system of energy and information and its temporal, ∆+1 mind system in balance with the field from where it extracts its energy and information; become a ‘whole function of exi=stience in time and space, ‘extracting from space’ the entropy motion and from time, the i-logic form required to imprint the body-wave of present
To exist in present, the body-wave thus needs to be in a relative balance with its world ecosystem and have a ‘mind imprinting’, a will to survive and perform its actions over that field… As it does so, through small steps trying to maximise its energy and information, Max. ∑ e x i, with the restriction imposed by any product function (e≈s, i≈t, Max. e x i| s=t), the function of existence will develop into an integral world cycle, where the maximal function will be ‘cheated’ in 3 points, as it turns the wheel of existence, the wheel of the world cycle: Max. e (youth) e=i (adult hood) and max. i (3rd age), before it dies into a zero sum.
I. TEMPORAL ALGEBRA (AB. ¬Æ)
“A perfect ∏ is an ∞ Present’ Ls On the immortal information of time world cycles, repeated ad infinitum in new generations
The connection more important in the world of stience is between GST and ¬Ælgebra of Time.
¬Ålgebra is the study of the sequences of space-time cycles, its hidden causality and the phases of the existence of a supœrganism and its parts.
We give it also the name of i-logic (time perspective), ¬Ælgebra (mathematical perspective) or T.Œ, a Theory of the Organic Everything, scientific taoism, Generator Syntax, trinity, duality, you name it.
It is concern on how a Universe is constructed departing of 3 motions of time with different geometry that through synchronous, simultaneous actions regulated by cyclical patterns, networks and co-existing scales, becomes the complex œ-worlds we see around us.
In normal time theory all this sounds to mysticism. You just study motions in space with a simple formula v=s/t that makes time entropy and motion, in lineal fashion, and describe the motion of ensembles of beings with maximal detail and that’s that.
Non-Ælgebra of time.
In complex ternary universes, the causality is not so clear as it is both deterministic – from a point of time yu can only go, ∆S ∆T (-∆S) and ∆ST (SxT) ¬st (•). So you do have 3+0 possibilities in a modular Universe: passive mental perception, increase of entropy, of information or iteration of both. It is the constant ‘choice’ of 4 equal paths of action/non-action, what determines the future and so it constantly branches into possibilities.
Yet those choices tend to be apperceived, programmed, following the automatic, vegetative or conscious program of survival, which tries to maximise the ∑ExI structure of the being conserving its present.
So the Universe is both deterministic (in 4 branches) probabilistic in the choice of them but ‘played with charged dices’, those of survival.
now we call the algorithm of survival that automatically has been ‘selected’ as the informative algorithm that replicates constantly in the Universe, the supœrganism in space, the world cycle in time, and the algorithm of survival, Max. ∑Spe<≈>Tiƒ, the generator equation, which constantly repeats by performing survival actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, Max. ExI, taken from a balanced background space≈time (st)…
THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE
On the function of present existence, Max. exi (s≈t), and how it creates systems through actions that combine yang-energy-motion and yin-information into balanced maximal standing points of a world cycle, where the system will try to maintain itself by sharing advantageously entropy and form with the external world, trying to iterate its information, making it survive.
The universe indeed conserves information as a fractal constantly reproducing ‘island-universes’,fractal space-time beings whose structure simplified mentally into the concept of a generator equation with 3 topological motional Spe < St>Tiƒ, self-centred in a point of max. information or TIƒ mind, spread over a field of entropy, which it transforms through space-time actions into a hyperbolic body-wave…
This being, the supœrganism (ab. œ) is the fundamental particle of the Universe, considered in time as a world cycle, in space as a simultaneous, co-existing supœrganism, extending in 3 ∆+1 scales of relative size and speed of cyclical informative clocks, in the 5th dimension.
We are made of actions of space and time, of energy and information, ExI in relativity, Ex T in quantum physics Se x Ti = K, in the metric of the 5th dimension. This much we know since Planck, though few philosophers if any has explored in depth what it means to us.
The function and arrows of existence: a,e,i,o,u.
To be in the larger picture is to be part of a super organism in which the ∆-1 being (i-1) performs smaller tasks; to be an individual which performs the 7 motions of existence as it goes through its world cycle, and to be the ‘God’, ∆+1 whole of a smaller myridad of beings that make up the system. This 3rd function however is modulated by the ‘subconscious ego’ of the system, its inner networks, and so does not affect to what we call generically existence, ‘self-centred’ in the being and its ∆+1 whole.
If we define the being by its highest informative language-head or particle ab. i, all i-beings of a given i-scale of the 5th dimension will become a fractal point around which a territory and a series of social flows of communication will establish a wave of existence, Max. ExI (s-t), the function of existence thus will be displayed by the fractal point, which will enact symmetries across the scales of the 5th dimension, seeking more energy for its body moves and reproductions, more information for its mind games of perception and love.
What is the purpose of the fractal game? To preserve by repetition of present balanced space-time actions, the super organism in an immortal state. To exist the being absorbs and emits energy and information, ±∆E x I.
In the graph actions of energy’s and information’s absorption and emission (-∆æ: acceleration, +∆e: feeding, -∆i: communication +∆i: perception) move the being through its ages as it absorbs more energy than information.
In the graph, the program of the Universe is simple, made of survival åctions performed by each Œ-point, with the help of its ‘ternary, organic parts’, as all systems, make 2 type of Simplex Actions of absorption and emission of energy and information with their limbs/fields and heads/particles and Complex Åctions of reproduction and social evolution with their bodies/waves, TO ENSURE THEIR SURVIVAL in a fractal, bio-logical Universe:
Simplex, æ, ï Actions:
±∆Æ: Feed on spatial energy to perform future spatial motions and grow their territorial Vital Space (±∆æ: – a: locomotion, which emits energy, +e: absorbtion of energy or feeding). We introduce with those actions the Logic Concept of ‘Energy’, as Potential Energy (Stored, fed Energy: +∆E) and Kinetic Energy (Accelerated motions that change the trajectory of the being, -∆E). Those will be the only verbal concepts of Energy in T.Œ, while we shall respect the Physical concept for other equations)
– Tƒ-actions: ±∆ï: Emit≈ Communicate or absorb Information=perceive with their particles-heads (±∆ ï: +∆i: perception, -∆i: communication by emission of information )
We call this actions, ‘simplex actions’, as they involve merely the absorbtion or emission of the simplest substances of reality, spatial, lineal motions and cyclical information.
And use to define them the ‘verbal concepts’ of energy and information, less precise than its mathematical formulae (as energy is a precise mathematical concept which includes both, potential energy, related to form, position, information and kinetic energy related to lineal motion, but in the common language energy is used more as synonymous of capacity to push and asmove, of kinetic energy).
Simplex actions are connected to the world cycle of beings and its symmetry in space, Sp (energy action)Tƒ (informative action), by the fact they are performed through the 3 connected parts of any system, and chained causally, as a system needs to ‘absorb information’ (∆i) in order to perceive the energy they want to feed on (+∆e), and will move towards that energy (-∆a), and communicate often with other beings of its herd to hunt that energy (∆ï).
On the other hand, when the system has achieved this primary actions (±Ei), in the short term, which are needed to refill the energy and information of its minds, bodies and limbs (particles, waves and fields in physical systems); it tries on the long term to realize two complex actions of survival, reproduction, which ensures survival after death and social evolution, which makes the parts stronger:
– So we talk of two complex åctions, when there is stored enough energy and information available to perform them: the Œ-point will reproduce its System in a small offspring of similar beings, (Œ ∑œ-1) in other region of space-time, and then those clones and similar beings will evolve together to become a larger whole of the 5th dimension: ∑œ-1>Œ.
Reproduction and social evolution are thus two complex actions intimately connected. And the result of those 5 actions, we shall call the ‘a, e, ï, œ, û’ of existence is a simple program of survival which all systems follow.
The symbols we shall use for those actions are vowels, and they are self-evident (we prefer them to the strict Spe, Tƒ, ST ternary elements and ages of space-time, to make them easily comprehensible). So a is ‘acceleration’, e is energy feeding, i is perception of information, ï is communication between two points, œ is an offspring of similar œ-points and û is the creation of a a Universal whole in an upper ˆplane of the 5th dimension.
We shall also use the å symbol for an existential action, as it is performed always by a o-point, and as in the case of the ‘added’ terms on our vowels, distinguish the concept easily from other uses of normal languages.
The wider game.
Our game of existence is limited to perform a few actions for our bodies and minds – as we feed, we perceive, we reproduce and we socialize with other humans or construct mechanisms that manipulate energy and information. And this type of actions we do, limited by the fact that we are systems as everything else in the Universe made of energy and information, is what we call the game of existence, the will for which we live and breathe and feel and want to ‘be’.
We exist by performing certain actions between birth and extinction in a society, actions remarkably identical to each other, to the point they can all be qualified in a few groups that we might call ‘dimensions of existence’. Departing from this fact we can trace for each particle of the Universe a simple physiological, structural program determined by its dimensions of existence, or type of actions it performs. This are the basis of a General Unification Theory of all sciences, called Systems sciences, in which we define a first ‘Generator’ equation of those ‘dimensions’ or actions of existence we all perform.
What are those dimensions? Simple. We are all systems of energy and information, either particles of information/fields of energy (physical species) or heads that process information and are moved by a body of energy (biological beings). Thus all systems absorb, emit and transfer and merge energy and information of an specific type they can decode and use to reconstruct their form, their own information. And so we establish 4 basic dimensions that all systems follow:
– Gauging information
– Feeding on energy to move and
– Reproduce its own information
– Forming networks with other self-similar beings with whom exchange of energy and information takes place.
Informing, feeding, reproducing and forming networks that become then units of a higher scale of the fractal game of the Universe, departing from a General Generator Equation and a series of rules, laws and simple causal processes creates a game of rather deterministic nature that can be even run as an algorithm of ‘life’ and ‘existence’ and will reproduce most of the events and forms of any physical or biological Universe.
This web uses mostly common or biological jargons, more anthropomorphic and less inclusive proper of XX century science, in the description of social sciences, of humans transferring information to machines, creating social networks called gods and civilizations, exchanging.
But there is a higher jargon, one which is more inclusive and hence deals with the terms of space and time instead of energy )space) and information *time cycles with a frequency.
This is the jargon of general systems sciences of which i consider myself the leading scientist on the blue planet but not perhaps further than alpha centauri (-;
How do we apply those dimensions to our analysis of sociological life? Easy.
Consider what you are in more detail: your desire for energy is expressed in your body and blood/digestive/motion-muscle systems, those 3 sub-physiological systems are ‘living systems’ that desire and show a will to hunt for that energy.
You are also made of 3 endocrine systems that reproduce different hormones and nervous thought impulses that process information and so on. We can in fact decompose you as a system which is made like a knot of flows of energy and information – those physiological systems – constantly processing.
So the sum of all those ‘dimensional wills’ of all the similar individuals of the homo species, results in an economy and the goods of the welfare state we want.
And this is the application of a biological analysis of economics: a perfect society is one that satisfies with maximal production those needs, for right energy and information, family/reproductive values and social peace and communication (free social time).
Its measure is already applied by the UNO which also calls ‘dimensions’ those types of goods, since obviously each species knows what he needs to take care of its dimensional actions to survive – feeding and informing and reproducing and evolving socially in peace, the UNO has ‘figured it out’ without the need of having a ‘theory’ behind.
So the IHD, the index of Human Development of societies shows the ‘WHealth’, the healthy wealth of a society that fulfills those dimensions and gives to its citizens food, shelter, health, information and social peace, is a good example of 3 dimensions of social and life existence that are maximized by an economical index of welfare, and represent the type of actions that we need to do to satisfy our welfare.
We use it extensively here.
In a wider view, all what we do can be resumed as e xi actions, which coincidentally can be written as a mirror of its verbal meaning: e x i = st, we mix energy and information performing a time-space cycle in which we obtain or not energy, information reproduction social actions with others.
All what you do is tending to feed your body your mind, reproduce/love and come together with others.
So we are in that wider jargon ‘knots of space-time cycles’. A space-time cycle is any trajectory of any entity of the Universe in search of one of its 4 dimensions of existence, energy, information, reproduction and social evolution.
Those 4 ‘quantum numbers’ (in the case of particles of physics) or ‘drives of life’ (in the case of biological beings), or ‘social actions’ (in the case of human beings), or ‘types of machines’ (in the case of the economic ecosystem) and so on, are the underlying, logic, biologic, survival, systemic, social program that runs the universe with a precision of mathematical origin and a vitality of biological, and perceptive nature.
And this is what we describe in this section of the web, the program of the Universe…
THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE
‘The universe is made of actions of energy and time, h=E X T’ Planck, on the function of existence of physical beings.
One of the simplest equation of existence, ExIt (hst-3) is the equation of the constant of planck, the ‘space≈time’ constant.
‘To act or not to act. That is the question. Wether is… the mind to suffer… the arrows of… fortune, Or… by opposing to end them: to die.‘ Hamlet, Shakespeare
‘I don’t have enough energy of time for all this’ Naked, Leigh
Humans act with energy and time, and so while its function of existence is more complex than the one of quantum systems (exi|h:st-3), certainly is of the same ‘quality’, a function of temporal energy.
“As many more individuals of each species are born than can possibly survive; and as, consequently, there is a frequently recurring struggle for existence” Charles Darwin
On the opposition between the being and the hostile world that surround it: To be is to exist, to exist is to move through the space-time symmetries and ∆-scales of the Universe absorbing energy and information for your system, ±∆e,i, reproducing both, exi, and coming together with similar beings. Yet in a fractal Universe ‘closed’, there is always a struggle to obtain that ∆e,i, from other beings. And this causes uncertainty in each encounter, opposition and final death when someone else absorbs your exi.
‘To be is to be related.’ The world of the Non-A beings. A.E. Vogt.
‘Love each other’ Jesus, The law of eusocial evolution and ‘long term future’.
On the networks of existence and the best strategy of all being: to ally with similar forms through eusocial evolution and love≈sharing of energy and information.
In the graph, the fundamental actions of space-time of all beings, performed through its world cycle which can be considered the integral of the function of existence, ∑exi (s=t)
By the number of ‘quotes’ on the function of existence that opens this post, the reader should realise of the importance of this post, which embeds in the function of existence the will of the Universe and all its parts.
Indeed, we have come to the fundamental algebraic expression of the generator equation, the ‘function of existence’ – again a logic, algebraic expression, which encodes the verbal, topological and analytical meaning of any super organism and its 3 parts, extended across the 3 scales of the super organism.
- Tiƒo ∆+1: the cyclical particle-head-upper class in control of the linguistic algorithm, also residence of the mind of the system, which is a network, fully connected, ∏, hence with a complex dual structure, in which the upper ‘whole’ or mind (∆0+1) connects to all its individual axon cells forming a solid network that is displaced into the future, a quantum of time, ahead on the direction of motion, guiding the…
- exi: body-wave of information and energy, which feeds on
- s=t (-1), a relative field of entropy and information, which carries the ‘temporal energy’ to start the evolution of the system and/or replenish the motion and form, energy and curvature, loss in the game of existence:
In the graph, the absolute arrow of future in the Universe is social evolution from parts into wholes. Thus space-time ∆ust r=evolves into social networks, through the common search for similar energy and information, starting a process of ‘existence’, in time and space that will derive in the final creation of a social super organism.
This post was initially called ‘To<exi=st’, and also ‘function of exi=stence’, which resumes in a simple equation: Max exi (s=t). Indeed, all Nature’s systems of space-time have a ternary structure: Spe (limbs-fields of entropy) > St (wave-bodies of energy & in/form/ation) > Tiƒ (heads-particles of higher dimensional form) and as such they must engage in exchanges of motion≈entropy≈Spe, cyclical logic forms≈Tiƒ, and its body-wave combinations (energy and information), to renew the entropy of its limbs/fields, the energy of its wave-bodies, and the in-form-ation of its heads-particles; if they want to survive.
To<exi(s=t), define therefore in a conceptual wor(l)d, the 3 parts of the being, its cyclical temporal head of maximal form, To, which absorbs energy < from a body exi, which absorbs entropy from a field, st.
So automatically by the mere fact that systems that absorbs energy and information for its bodies and heads, waves and particles, survive, ALL systems of nature perform cyclical actions of absorption and emission of energy and information.
The will of all super organisms: maximise your existence: Max. ∑Exi (s=t)
The function though is MORE than a mere acronym of the generator equation, since we can indeed consider that all systems follow a simple mandate of survival: to maximise its function of existence, which written in a more proper way expresses the actions of space-time of all beings:
Will of survival Max. ∑ e x i (s=t)
This apparently simple equation is at the heart of reality. As all systems made of 3 parts, will constantly emit and absorb energy and information, ±∆e, i, through its body-heads, wave-particles in order to survive, and will try to reproduce both (Exi) through those body-waves, which is a function, maximised when e=i (9×1<8×2-7×3).
So systems will have a balance between its energy and information networks, (mens sana in corpore sanum), and will constantly strive to replenish its energy and information, extracted from a lower field, made of smaller parts, which will also be in balance (S=t), between its components of entropy and curvature-form.
Further on, they will try to evolve socially, ∑, to maximise the survival and size in space and synchornicity in time of the system.
So for every system we shall find a similar equation which will explain the actions of the being, explained quantitatively for physical systems (and a fascinating adventure of the mind is to express physical quantum equations in terms of the function of existence and the actions of space-time of all beings, so for example the 4 quantum numbers as the 4 letters of genetics, express mainly one of those 4 fundamental actions (energy feeding and locomotion, 1st number, gauging of information, 2nd number, reproduction, spin number, and social evolution, magnetic number)
While in life beings, the equation resumes the 4 drives of existence (feeding, informing, reproducing evolving socially), which therefore are common to all survival beings. And also the top predator function of a system (max. ∑e xi, will be a top predator in all contacts, in physical systems akin to the maximal momentum, which wins the collisions between physical systems).
And so we can consider all systems ‘knots of cyclical actions of exchange of energy and information’, the primary drives of life that apply also to physical systems (where those exchanges are regulated by the main quantum numbers).
But the most evolved ‘dust of space-time’, also reproduces and evolves socially into larger wholes and scales of the 5th dimension, creating social networks and super organisms which are wholes stronger than individuals. So we can consider that the evolution of superorganisms and its world cycles, maximise the function of survival and existence of all systems of Nature, and have also become the ‘rule’ followed by all of them, including physical systems which evolve particles into atoms, molecules, matter states and cosmological bodies.
So dust of space time r=evolves and evolves in cyclical patterns and frequency actions of survival, which are discontinuous as the system constantly ‘switches’ between survival tasks, alternately feeding on energy, spending it in locomotions, reproducing its systems and evolving socially with clone systems.
All this fascinating bio-logical and topological reality is what we study in this post and all posts related to the function exi=stence, its cyclical actions and its space-time knots (organic systems that perform those cycles in time).
It is an enormous discipline in its own, as most equations of sciences can be derived from the Max. Exi (s=t) function. And if not of the different ‘derivative and integral functions’ of its individual actions of motion, feeding, perception and reproduction->social evolution.
We thus talk of a function of existence, whose study is the fundamental purpose of Universal algebra, as the sum of all the space-time actions of the Universe, integrated along time gives us a world cycle of existence of a supeorganism, which emerges as a whole knot or sum of those space-time actions, experiences 3 ages and then explodes back and dies:
∫Å:∫(±∆e,i, exi) ∂e∂i: Life arrow of Universal super organism} + [-∆i +∆e: moment of death] = 0 sum
The 5th Dimension: Space- Time Actions.
Scientists often forget the 5th dimension of time, the cycles of existence and extinction from past to future that bio-logically trace reality.
Of what is that flow made? The answer is obvious for a philosopher: of functions of existence, time cycles from birth to death of infinite beings, which have in common to be born, develop, exist and die.
This, we call in General Systems sciences, the 5th and 6th dimensions of the Universe, the past and the future.
And if we consider each being of the Universe a knot of space-time actions, searching and exchanging energy and information with other knots, we can consider that they by performing those actions are all together webbing the future, creating it, forming, in/form/ing the networks and paths and patterns and cycles, exi, e<=>i, flows of exchanges of energy and information, infinite of them: ∑e<=>I, and that is what we call the Generator of Existence, the sum of all those infinite flows and cycles that web reality. If you consider that space has 3 dimensions; that Einstein studied the 4th dimension of ‘present time’); then we talk of the past and the future and its logical, ‘bio-logical’, action-based cyclical flows as the 5th and 6th dimensions of time.
In General Relativity Einstein achieved an exact measure of ‘simultaneous’ moments of time. This present, ‘spatialization of time, comes from Galileo, who described it, ∂t=∂S/v, as a derivative function, a tangential point of a much larger flow of time.
Thus relativity and physicists in general, study NOT change of form, of in/form/ation, of morphology in time – the realm of biology with whom systems sciences connects, but they study the minimal possible change in time, that of motion, translation in simultaneous moments, using derivatives and hence ‘instantaneous moments’ that allow measure. Einstein’s concern as that of physicists was therefore ‘present’ time, not the flows from past to future and its logic causality as general systems science are.
In terms of history of thought, General Systems and the study of the 5th and 6th dimensions of time is to XXI century time theory what General Relativity was to XX century time theory or evolution to XIX century, Leibniz in the XVIII and Galileo in the XVII, the ‘cyclical’ step of the human-kind, which seems to have a centennial frequency in deep advances on the understanding of the ultimate parameters of reality, space and time. (1)
And science consists mostly in predicting the future of certain species existential cycles observing the patterns and frequencies of repetition of previous cycles.
The scales of ‘—motions’ and information, in decametric, or dual scales.
Wholes have the capacity to kill smaller wholes, but at certain degree of smallness the whole becomes in fact a potential prey. Parts, bacteria that kill wholes, thus can also disaggregate wholes. The predator prey relationship is thus ore complex than it appears. But in any case ever herd ∑Sp, regardless of its inner ∏Tƒ form is perceived as ‘—motions’ for a higher whole, ∏∆+1, which will try to explode the ∑ herds and feed on ∆-1 forms, laving behind the ∑ head. He state in which one finds at each moment of the existential game, prey in a herd, knot of higher thought reproducer, creator, all those functions as complex as we might feel them are finally mere åctions of the equation of existence, and that sets the existential algebra as the mathematics of the function of existence.
Which itself is the generator equation of complementary systems of ‘—motions’ and information eh fundamental particle of reality made of an Se x Tƒ sections body-head, particle-fields that preys in a herds of micro points ∑Sp∆-1 and so we establish a hierarchical class structure of future, present and past also as the future takes advantage of the present and the past is the neuronal caste of information while the present is the middle class which busy busy reproduces and produces the ‘—motions’ of ∑Sp∆-1.
This is the key to understand in terms of social classes past, the lower caste, present the reproducer, repeater caste and future the informative caste. For example in human scales, male which are mind dominant, with lineal bodies and woman which are productive body dominant, with an ‘—motions’ head, you can establish future, upper caste of males a reproductive caste of women, and then the ∑ of ∆-1 natural animals seen as a lower caster of information and hence treated as pure ‘—motions’ by the human ‘family’ complementary couple, man-woman.
The expression in which the simultaneous equation of past=‘—motions’, present=reproduction future=Information manifests itself. Are multiple.
‘—motions’ (past, ecosystem) > Present (reproductive body) >Future, (Informative mind)…
It is the simplest and most common point of view, a fractal future zero point of maximal information guides a middle class of reproductive capacities, and higher matter brains, that keep the join relationship between ‘—motions’ and information alive: Sp X Tƒ =K, S=T+K, K, Sp, O, Sp, K, I
ACTIONS OF ENTROPY AND TIME
The Universe is made of 2 substances: spatial Entropy and informative time. We can see it with motion as Entropy and time or as fixed forms, as space and information.
We can see it as a single reality, as space and time, or as a multiple quanta, as Entropy and information. We can differentiate them by form, as space and Entropy are lineal or planar surfaces and time and information are cyclical. And we can see it together into beings, the simplest of which is an action of light, s x t=k.
This duality structures all beings of reality. So we are made of cyclical heads and lineal bodies. Weapons are lines that release Entropy. Informative machines are cyclical, and all physical systems are made of lineal forces and cyclical particles of information.
The formal duality: Se, Lineal, energetic space vs. Cyclical Informative, time: Tƒ.
Tƒ start this review of different space and time concepts and developments, we must therefore consider first the 3 fundamental inversions/symmetries of space and time:
The form vs. motion inversion of physics and the mind.
The O-time clocks of information vs. _ lineal distances and motions of space, (information vs. energy inversion), proper of biology, mathematics and eastern philosophies and civilizations.
And the hierarchical, height, time past to future arrow of creation of wholes, its networks and its parts, vs. the democratic, social, herd-like planes of existence, or | vs. _ inversion of the 5th dimension, which being the more complex will deserve an entire section to deal with.
Let us then consider the geometric inversion in more detail.
We have kept for the end the analysis of the ‘alternative’, philosophical vision of time and space in Eastern philosophies, which were the first ‘philosophies of science’ that observed the wider Universe.
So there is a different ‘naming’ for the 2 dualities which structure the Universe, and I have used in most of my studies, so the reader will observe it often in the blog:
The comparison between 2 different formal motions, lineal motions and dimensions (Euclidean space) and cyclical motions and forms (time clocks).
We shall prefer this duality, which combines both space and time parameters of form and motion, since in the Universe as Minkowski rightly affirmed ‘space and time are in the darkness, only their space-time combinations shine.’ Or in terms of eastern taoist- buddhist philosophies that came closer to its understanding, ‘every yin has a drop of yang, every yang has a drop of yin’.
So while it is important to clarify the different concepts of present-spatial forms and time motions, to fully grasp the errors and virtues of mathematical physics and the logic conceptualization of space and time, for practical reasons, it is more interesting to study 2 ‘combined concepts’, which we shall term conceptually as ‘energy’ and ‘information’ (in mathematical physics those 2 concepts have strict mathematical definitions, but as we have seen concepts of logic nature do matter; so we shall use the verbal concepts, unless we are specifically dealing with phenomena studied by mathematical physics).
They are based in the duality of lineal vs. cyclical motion/form, where we aggregate here from a geometrical perspective our 2 x 2 dualities geometrically, since this is a more telling perspective on the structure of the Universe. Thus through the history of thought there is this duality NOT expressed in terms of time and space but with similar concepts. For example, Descartes said all what existed was made of res extensa (the equivalent to Euclidean space) and vortices (the equivalent of time clocks).
So we shall in this version consider 4 elements:
- |-Se, or lineal space distances/motions, which occupy maximal space. We shall call this spatial lineal form with a bit of motion, ‘Spatial energy’, or |-Se. It will be the fundamental concept applied to all systems to define the ‘lineal dimensions and motions of space’, the lineal momentum, the limbs and fields, which occupy maximal space with minimal volume, displace further in space, move faster and expand space.
- Tƒ, cyclical time clocks/forms, which occupy minimal space, last maximal time, and have repetitive, logic properties. We shall call this Tƒ factor, Temporal information as it carries the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. Thus again we related through the dominant geometrical duality of lines vs. cycles, temporal cycles or clocks with its still state, of information.
In the next graph slightly different from the equivalent one, we see this ‘different naming’ that stresses the duality between lines and forms. Now, at both extremes we have the pure ‘|-space’ distances, and the pure, O-time clocks.
But in the middle we have ‘energy’, which is the concept of lineal motion (kinetic energy, lineal momentum) and ‘information’ (which is the concept of cyclical form, with more dimensions than the line).
We must stress those are ‘concepts of verbal logic thought’, not the mathematical definition of energy and information, which is restricted to mathematical physics, but the usual way humans understand those 2 terms.
As people understands ‘energy’ as motion, and when talking of motion they talk of lineal motion, not of rotary motion, which is not common among humans. So people say ‘I don’t have enough energy to do this’, meaning he doesn’t have enough capacity to ‘move’ himself and move other things. And when people talk of information, they refer to form, to knowledge, to bits of formal shapes made of ‘circular dots’ put together into complex forms, which he perceives and ultimately are a sum of ‘infinitesimal time cycles’ that stay in the point. So we rewrite in those terms the function of existence:
And affirm that the Universe is a system made of ‘temporal energy’, of spatial energy and ‘temporal information’ of ‘yang’ and ‘yin’, whose combinations give birth to the infinite beings of reality. And consider those 4 elements.
|-S, pure space, or lineal dimensions.
Se-spatial entropy, forms with lineal momentum, kinetic energy or spatial energy
O, form, information. static circles which are often the memorial tails of:
Tƒ, Clock-like time cycles with repetitive patterns, or ‘pure time’.
Now, to further clarify which concept we talk of we shall capitalize and put first for each combination, the dominant element, and often place the | and O symbols or its Ø-wave body combination to stress what element dominates. I.e. O-Time is a clock with motion, |-Space is a lineal dimension, O-Space is a form of information, which stresses the passive form; Tƒ, is also a form of information, which stresses the active role of that information. I know all this sounds confusing, but a true mirror of the Universe should be accustomed to manage those paradoxical essential events of reality.
I imagine the reader schooled on mathematical physics would like definitive definitions, according to the Aristotelian, lineal logic that implies A->B, and by reductio ad absurdum, A≠B. But the Universe is dialectic, A<=>B, A and B constantly mix into combined forms, <=> which is what exist in present: space-time bidimensional formal motions. So we shall use also this ‘other variety’ that defines two pure limits of dimensional, lineal space, and moving time cycles, and two intermediate concepts of entropy or energy (lineal space with motion) and information (time cycles frozen into a past form).
Of course in physics energy is an overall concept that includes it all. But for that reason is of little use beyond the obvious fact that all is all and all is conserved. So they add kinetic energy (which is the concept equivalent to our spatial energy) and Potential energy (which is more akin to a form with a fixed position, hence closer to information). Mathematical physics and its concept of energy is a unfortunate concept like that of God, which encloses it all. It has though given enormous fruits because of this distinction, which properly ‘called’ should be Kinetic Energy or ‘energy’ and ‘Stored Information’ or Potential energy. Then we could fully grasp the duality and principle of conservation of energy and information to define the function of existence of relational space-time beings:
Œ. ‘All what exists is a complementary system of Spatial Energy and Temporal Information that trans-forms each other ad eternal: Se<=>Tƒ ≈ Sp X I=ST±4’
Now we can consider the first formulation, the dynamic ‘temporal one’, Se<=>Tƒ, whereas Se would be the arrow of entropic, lineal time, Tƒ, the arrow of future, informative cyclical time, and the middle <=> the wave body of present space-time.
And the second formulation the spatial, static formal one, where Sp will be the limbs/fields of lineal space, i, the informative head, and its combination, X, an organism tied up by bodies-waves, which create a ‘diffeomorphic’, relational space-time being, ST extended across several planes of the 5th dimension.
Again, it is not possible to encase the dynamic ever changing reality of space form that becomes time motions, of lines that become cycles, through intermediate waves-bodies in strict ‘fixed’ conceptual terms. This is an error of the mind that ‘fixes’ motions and dynamic processes into simplified static mappings, which seem ‘focused’ and more truth. So first we had fixed geometry and now we have moving topologies, and so on. The reader should make thus a bending of his mind to fully grasp the paradoxical, more complex, fractal structure of the dynamic universe, where form is just the mind’s perception of a given motion. So today mathematics can find for every dynamic equation a topological, formal demonstration based in that duality.
In that regard, the concepts of ‘lineal, spatial energy’ and ‘temporal clocks of information’ is more useful when studying the complementary ‘yin-yang’ species of the Universe; and the reader should understand both conceptualizations, to reveal the hidden structures of nature:
So I often choose to study as the centerpiece of the analysis of the Universe, the geometric duality between cycles≈circles vs. lines≈speeds, in the ‘philosophical fashion’ of Eastern cultures, which understand the Universe an opposition between:
- Cyclical motions/forms (yin-Vishnu duality), which I called ‘O-Time’, and
- Lineal motions/forms (yang-Shiva), which I called |-space.
Since a line and its lineal motion and a cycle and its circular forms are two states of the same thing, the opposition between lineal dimensions/motions of space vs. cyclical clocks/motions of time is more telling of the paradoxical properties of the Universe.
Thus i call in those different ways the dualities of stop vs. go, form vs. motion, O vs. |, TIME VS. SPACE. Tƒ vs. Se.
And treat O-forms and Time cycles as clocks of time, Tƒ, in present dynamic form and past memorial information.
And lineal, space dimensions and its |-speeds, as |-Space, Se, as relative past, entropic, energetic motions and forms.
So when you read, O-Time we mean both cycles and circles (clocks and informations) and when I write |-space we mean both speeds and lines (energies and lengths).
Since O-Time vs. |-space is a better ‘mind construction’ to describe the underlying form vs.motion, | vs. O beats of existence than the human classic, western concept of space as form and time as motion.
Yet the western mind defined unlike the eastern mind in Aristotelian terms time and space NOT as geometric dualities but as the duality between motion=time and form=space.
And since this culture is today global and the purpose of this web is to standardize 20 years of independent research on relational space-time for ‘human readers’, I will try in the future to stick to the ‘canonical’ concept and write | and O motions as time and | and O forms as present space.
The reader should though understand both approaches the western time=motion, space=form and the eastern, time=yin=cycles of information and space=yang=lineal forms/motions.
In the graph we describe all species of reality as made of this ‘geometrical duality, where ‘Energetic space describes lineal space with motion, and Tƒ, Time cycles means both the cycle, and its informative combinations.
Whereas time cycles dominates and encircles the vital space – a fact which in mathematical physics defines the operations of Integration of a volume of space, restricted to the ‘boundary conditions’ of the time cycle/sphere. showing again the intimate relationship between ‘logic mathematics’ and iTS (invariant, isomorphic timespace theory).
This geometric duality defines then two perfect forms of |-space and O-Time, which fluctuate between the state-present still and past to future to past relative flows of energy (from bigger scales into lower scales) and information (from lower ‘genetic’ scales to larger ones).
THUS WE WILL USE BOTH CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF THE O-|, FORM-MOTION DUALITIES of the Universe:
- |-Se (lineal space/speed) vs. O-Tƒ (cyclical clocks of information) and.
- Past (entropic motions) < Space (still repetitive present) > Future (logic time clocks that create the future)
Again the reader should understand that the Universe is ‘interpreted’ in different ways according to species and languages, but ultimately what matters is not the ‘human conceptualization of it’, but the dualities, O-|, past and future, and its present combinations that surface in ‘present’.
In that regard all systems of Nature including human beings, are made of formal spaces and time cycles that enclose them, and only pegging them all together, we can talk of an absolute abstract space, S, as the sum of all those ‘fractal spaces’, ø-Se, which are (perceived in motion), quanta of energy, the time function of space.
Sp |-Se (speed-motion: kinetic energy) x Tƒ (mass/charge).
On the other hand each vital time motion, which encircles the Space system. has its own clock cycles that measure its motions and rotations, and only equalizing all time clocks and cycles, with the human ‘thought-heart-eye’ beat of a second, we could talk of a single Human Time scale for the whole Universe…
Yet, if we put all those spaces together and refer all those time clocks to a single time scale, we can measure better reality from the human perspective, which is what practical science needs to build and operate its machines and set up its systems of collective time measure. And for that reason, from the XIX c. onwards – when clocks were synchronized to match the timetables of railroads – we use a single time clock.
What relational space-time does, is to return to the original ‘fact-event’, the time cycle, consider it the unit of the Universe and study a reality of infinite such cycles, resolving with this new realism most of the conundrums and questions of different sciences.
So now we can study some of those elements and symbols, which define the fundamental concepts of relational space-time, starting from the analysis of time as motion and its 3 types of motions, the entropic, expansive past, the present, iterative formal space and the future, informative cyclical form, and the sequential equations of the life-death cycle defined by them.
Actions and the 5th dimension.
The previous graph, written with the formal symbols of ¬Æ shows a few systems of different scales of reality performing from left to right those 5 actions, as they move and feed on Spatial Energy, reproduce, perceive information, an evolve socially.
And the result of all those combined åctions is the arrow of absolute future of the 5th dimension, the arrow of social evolution, (û), which grows in social scales, from parts into wholes, as parts are needed first for wholes to become in the future:
In terms of the different planes of the fifth dimension, most actions take place between planes of existence, even if their outcome is perceived in a single plane, as systems, self-centered in an ∆o plane, probe downwards and upwards in the scales of the 5th dimension in search of:
– Its pixels of in-form-ation (i≈∆-3 bits), boosts of motion (a≈∆-4 fields), and bites of energy (e≈∆-2); stored to provide those boosts of motion or iterate the system in the lower cellular scale (∆-1).
On the other direction upwards, the system will interact with its larger social organism and world performing its ‘slavish’ cycles of existence, as a relative arrow of the larger whole. The purpose of all those åctions is self-evident: to improve the survival chances of the system, introducing a biological will in all points of view.
The human program of actions.
Humans also obey the survival action program. They basically have just a larger ‘range’ of options to choose between information, energy and social behavior, but ultimately do the same that the smallest electron.
Indeed, when you eat you can choose more than a bite of light as electrons do, but you are still feeding on energy to boost your motions; when you love you are still on reproduction mood and when you gather with other humans on social evolutionary mood, creating new ‘Universals’, collective planes of existence, ‘mass-numbers’.
Yet human, anthropomorphic, subjective Uo points of view submitted to the ‘Mind’s paradox’, which rejects motion/living properties in all entities that are:
- A) removed from Uo (Max.∆) and…
- B) Static, as the mind stops most motions into form to fill in its reduced static space, implies that humans never had and probably never will recognize the Pantheist Universe of self-similar beings, which the existence of those åctions and codes prove.
Anthropomorphic understanding of the will of survival: Actions and languages that describe them.
Thus, as always when dealing with humans and any p.o.v. we distort the actions of other beings from our self-ish point of view denying them to other beings, or qualifying other systems as objects over which we perform our actions. This is shown in the 2 languages we use to describe actions.
Now when we analyze those actions in more detail, there are two elements which enter in relationship: the œ-point that performs the action and the system over which the action happens.
In terms of the ‘ternary Universal Grammar’ that describes all actions from a linguistic point of view, human verbal thought has ‘nailed’ the structure of those actions, far better than mathematics with a simple logic structure proper of all its sentences (Chomsky):
I (subject) < verb (actions) > Object (over which the Ei action is performed).
Physics on the other hand, as it is only concerned with the study of ‘locomotions’, reduces the concept extremely, reason why we shall not use it here. In that sense, in theoretical physics, an action is an abstract quantity that describes the overall motion of a physical system, and therefore it corresponds to the simplex of those 5 actions, a. We shall thus comment on physical actions and its most interesting perspectives (the Lagrangian of actions, the law of least time and the unit of quantum actions), when dealing with ‘locomotions’.
Ultimately what physicists do with their topic reductionism is to deny ‘physical systems’, the vital will proper of those actions. Mind the reader, for a physicist always the physicist is the only intelligent being, mathematics the only language of knowledge and everything an object. So the fact that electrons and quarks do reproduce when they absorb energy is NOT an action but a deocupling, the fact that magnetic fields organize huge social groups of atoms is NOT a social action, but a lattice, and so on.
THE SURVIVAL PURPOSE OF ACTIONS.
Now actions are the core of the vital program of ‘existence’ vs. extinction of the Universe. They exist for beings to exist. Species who perform those actions survive, and continue the game. Those who don’t disappear. And so it is only a question of ‘time’ that only species that perform the 5 actions, æ, ï, œ, û, survive (we group the dual absorption and emission of spatial energy and temporal information, ±e and ±i, with dual letters, æ and ï, to couple them with the 2 complex actions of reproduction œ and û)
External and Internal symmetry between actions and parts: trinity.
Thus the 2 most important isomorphisms of the Universe are:
From an external p.o.v. the dual and ternary symmetries between spatial synchronous organic form and temporal motions.
From an internal œ-mind, with its will of existence, the 5 ‘ a, e, ï, œ, û’ survival åctions, which conform the program of the Universe.
Both isomorphisms are related as actions are the will of the being to ‘maintain’ in balanced and ‘fill up’, the 3 parts of all beings:
æ actions therefore belong to limbs-fields of spatial ‘energy’; a is the kinetic motion, e the storing of potential energy.
ï actions belong to the To-head/particle that process temporal information.
œ actions are reproductive actions of the ST-body wave, the present being that creates an offspring of equal beings.
And so the û-niversal actions beyond the being, are those of the 5th dimension when the being is part of the whole.
This other angle on the analysis of actions (a difficulty of T.Œ is to realize that unlike the one-dimensional human mind, the Universe does have many perspective on any reality; so we are here giving a few on the concept of survival actions), shows how actions and scales of the 5th dimension are connected, such as æ, ï actions relate the being to ∆-n lower scales where it feeds and perceives, œ to ∆-beings of its same scale and û to the ∆+n social scales.
The minimal actions: Duality
Now, we call simplex actions, the æ, ï actions because those are performed by all beings. Indeed, some beings do NOT reproduce, but all must at least as long as they exist emit and absorb spatial energy and temporal information, Sp<≈ > Tƒ.
All systems have spatial kinetic lineal motions and cyclical clocks of temporal information. All systems are made of motion and form. So all systems at least do emit or absorb motion and form, which we shall call despite the imprecision of the terms, generically spatial energy and temporal information, ± ∆ e, i.
Hence the use of the general synonymous concepts: Sp≈æ, Ti≈ï. ST≈Ei
This gives us the 4 simple åctions for the minimalist Sp≈Tƒ being:
- -∆æ: motion and changes in accelerations by emission of kinetic energy
- +∆e: kinetic energy absorption or feeding
- +∆ï: observer’s perception by absorption of information
- -∆ï: emission of information to communicate.
Those are thus the 4 ±∆ e, i natural simplex åctions in space-time of any being. We could in this ‘qualitative’ less precise language, talk of entities that absorb and emit information with their particles/heads and energy for their bodies (that store it) and limbs (that spend it with kinetic motions).
And so in the perfect state of ‘present’, any system conserves ST, Ei, Present existence.
This present existence is one in which the balance of information and energy of the system remains in a dynamic constant process of absorption and emission of both, in balance with the environment, which allows the system to repeat its existential åctions and survive.
The limits of actions. Max./Min. Tƒ, Sp: The equations of death
Now the limits of actions by overdrive or lack of Spæ and T ïƒ are ‘death’: As we said actions are the will of existence, so lack of action is dead, or ‘frozen states of not-being’ (hibernation, coldness≈ slow down of time clocks, etc.)
So we write two equations of death by excess or lack of Spatial Energy and Temporal Information:
Min. Tf x Max. Spæ: Death by overdrive of energy – accident, young death, cubs feeding predators, big-bangs, wars etc.
Min. Spæ x Max. Tƒ: Death by overdrive of information – 3rd age, warping, mass attraction, coldness, freeze, etc.
Now of course, for each species, in physical systems, we must remember that the 3 different time clocks, frequency, temperature and speed define different forms of death. Systems can die in the ∆+1 gravitational scale by sheer pressure of mass. Systems can die in the temperature scale but frozen no motion. Systems can die in the ∆-1 scale by loss of frequency (gravitational red shift, and tiredness of light, Doppler death). The entire subject of death, when your clocks run too slow or too fast and your constant quanta of space, of vital energy are spent, or you get too fat eating them, is thus specific for each species, and one of the isomorphisms to study when applying the general equations of ST symmetries and ages to each species.
But in general åctions have limits imposed externally by the limits of the larger world in which the system exists, as they become ‘resonances’, synchronise and act on that world. So since the word is larger in Sp≈Tƒ parameters if the system does not watch out its internal balances it can die.
For example thermodynamic worlds, centred in the ∆-temperature scale and its species like humans are, cannot reach on their gravitational interactions in the outer world, speeds that go beyond c and temperatures below 0. So they will die.
In fact much before getting there. Since to fix the limits of Tƒ/Sp death we need to observe the limits of Time-space of the being which are always smaller than those of its word. So our temperature cannot go beyond ±310 K and our relative speed beyond 30 m/s, without risking a harmful accident.
This means that while åctions are ‘general’, isomorphic and can be described for all systems, detailed analysis of åctions will be specific of each species and its relative vital ‘constants, and the inverse parameters of density of energy and information of the system and the world it inhabits (Spe/Tƒ for the ∆-being and the ∆+1 world).
This post is obviously most focused on the general laws of those 5 åctions of existence, and the general bits of information and boosts of motion and bites of energy for entire families of species, belonging to ∆n planes of existence.
Such as the h-Planck bit of information for all electronic beings and its quantum rules, etc. So we shall only introduce this general elements here, reserving for 3-4 line posts detailed analysis.
The codes of actions.
What do 5D points of space and time do? to exist as points with volume, with 3 organic parts: To, the cyclical sphere, mind-mapping which directs a body-wave that iterates the system along a path of a field of space-time by exchanging energy and information in favorable conditions for its system So beings can be described formally as:
To (heads-particles)< Exi(body wave) ≈ ST: space-time field/limbs that move the system.
And consider that they are a ‘function of existence’, whose purpose is To< Exi≈st, by performing a series of actions of exchange of energy and information, with its environment, with the aim of growing and multiplying, reproduce and evolve into new planes of space-time.
In the graph, we see the function of existence of man as a ternary organism of space-time.
How often a system implement the cyclical space-time actions it needs? Simply.
They are discontinuous, modular cycles, as actions absorb or emit energy and information when the system spends it. so actions have time rhythms, and the system varies between them. We eat, perceive, fuc* and socialise not simultaneously. So actions are the origin of the discontinuous ‘beats’ of existence. A fuc* a day for young married couple, a fuc• a year for an animal in spring – those are different beats. We eat all days, we see each second. The order, rhythms, synchronicities, interdependence, etc, of actions are thus another huge field studied in our post on synchronous actions.
Another element thus becomes the way in which a mind through memorial logic circuits, stored mathematically or genetically, or verbally (physical, biological social systems) or in any other language of the mind performs its actions; and the ‘triggers’ of the different parts of the being that start up an action rhythm (hunger: ∆e, lust: ∆œ, curiosity: ∆i, etc. in man).
The study of the ‘action instructions’ or codes that make species perform those åctions, its periodicity and triggers (often defined externally by a volume of the e,i specific substance of the being) becomes then also an important part of this analysis.
For example, atomic systems perform third åctions by obeying the mathematical, Quantum codes of 4 numbers; Biological systems write their instructions in Genetic codes of 4 letters; instinctive behavior codes those åctions in 4 drives of life existence; the 4 dimensions of light space-time express those åctions in photons; 4 Maxwell equations develop them for electromagnetic currents…
Examples of the 4 codes of åctions.
How do actions reflect in the scientific languages. In physical sciences scientific equations are varieties of the Fractal Generator and its 3 space-time symmetries, Spe<STœ>Tiƒ, which reflect the space-time cycles of species. Those cyclical space-time actions are thus defined by Equations, which translate the ¬Æ symmetries of space-time into the jargon of mathematical physics.
But the ternary symmetry has 3 elements. So we must write it on a dual form, of the type Spe x Tif = STœ, Past x Future = Conserved Present, to establish the homology between the Generator, which is a logic development, and the equations of physics which are dual.
Then, as the graph shows, we must obviously define for each physical scale, what is the Tiƒ parameter of time frequeuncy (frequency, in the quantum scale of waves, temperature in the thermodynamic scale and speed in the gravitational scale); what is the spatial ‘unit’ or constant step of each scale (h-planck, for the quantum electromagnetic scale, k-boltzmann in the thermodynamic scale and m in the gravitational scale); and finally translate the space-time conserved quantity for each ∆-constant system, which will be, Ei (energy and information, both measure with the mathematical concept of Energy), when considered the whole, or momentum, when considered a ‘step’ of a cyclical, closed ‘conserved energy path’.
So to define cyclical space-time actions in physics, we work normally with a general equation of the form: Tiƒ (ƒ, T, v motion parameter) x Spe (h, k, m space quanta) = Ei (Energy function) or p (momentum).
And finally we need to define the element that ‘acts’, and the world in which it ‘acts’ and the scale of the Universe from where it ‘extracts’ its bits of information, bites of energy, seeds of reproduction etc.
So we must consider the active fractal point, Å which will be either a particle, atom, or matter state, cosmic body or dark matter form (strangelet, black hole), and then describe with equations that will usually contain the motion-time parameter, the space-quanta parameter and the energy function.
Then we can define some basic equation of physics for each action of existence, and start the fascinating though long process of translating each equation of physics to the isomorphic action it represents for the point of view that is at the center of each action.
So functions that represent the 4 vital åctions common to all species of space-time. Thus in each of those scientific scales 4 functional equations express the energetic, informative, reproductive and social åctions that suffice to describe the existence of each species:
∆-3: Light åctions.
4 Vital Dimensions explain the existence of light-space: the wide, energetic, magnetic field; the tall, informative, electric field; the reproductive, long wave speed, calculated as the product of its electric and magnetic field and its frequency colors, which are societies of photons:
In the graph, we have written the 3 dimensions of time, past, slow energy and future, fast information with the human time-clock speed as our relative present, point of view. Since simpler scales are causally in the past; as an entity is created literally by informing, molding with higher ∆+1 networks, simpler scales ‘cell by cell’. When a light wave moves, it does not ‘displace’ but reproduces its wave motions, ‘warping’ simpler gravitational 1D string lines, by a height factor of –ct (Relativity). Motion is really reproduction of information on a simpler ∆-1 scale. Thus we describe the 3 Time Dimensions of ‘social evolution’ of light across 3 ∆-scales as:
– ∑: Color is the 4th ‘social dimension’ of light, made by herding together multiple frequencies of light into a photon, its present, simultaneous space dimension. As space from the perspective of time dimensions is a present ‘slice’ of the total time flow – the 4th dimension of time. While inversely the Present, simultaneous measures of Time, are in Relativity the 4th dimension of space. Yet we reach a sounder description separating those 3+3 spacetime dimensions, by using multiple time speeds instead of a single 4D clock.
+i: Fractal electrons are Light’s ∆+1 dimension of future network evolution.
-i: The gravitational ∆-1 scale in which it feeds is its relative, to which it returns after ‘dying’, red-shifting and expanding its length-speed between galaxies (z>c).
Then as light warps into more informative, smaller beings (Max. Tƒ x Min. Sp), first electrons, then molecular orbitals and so on, each new ‘scale’ of light space-time requires the previous scales to be born. Thus causally simpler scales are in the past. When your ∆-neurons, create your ∏-whole, they are in the past, requiring an action-bit of time to synchronize and emerge as an ∆+1 whole into the future. That’s why the subconscious rules, and the ‘ego’ merely observes with its electric whole brain waves; or the molecular orbital appears ‘after’ the atomic ones dissolve into the whole.
Further on, complex ∆+∆ systems move slower, as they draw more information in a single space-point. A light beam of pure ¥-space informs only a gravitational line so it reaches the maximal c-speed of our spacetime membrane. But there is another parallel Universe of gravitational scales, of Sp-speed and information-order, made of dark, gravitational energy, quark matter and quark, boson stars (black holes), which are accelerating vortices of w>C and T the c-event horizon. And since we ‘don’t see’ gravitational information, its relative motion-speed is ∞, non-local.
4 Maxwell equations describe all the åctions of an electric field or rather its structure as a system with an external membrane, the magnetic field, an internal point of view, the charge, and the exchanges of energy and information between both poles and the external world (the content of its actions).
4 quantum numbers describe all the 4 ‘drives’ of existence of electrons:
Its level of energy (principal number), its gauging of information (2nd number), its reproductive decoupling when they have opposite ‘sexual’ spin number and evolve socially organized by the magnetic number.
In that regard, as in the case of energy we have to differentiate the concept of T.Œ’s actions and Action in physics.
Motion, in physics, may be described from at least two points of view: the close-up view and the panoramic view. The close-up view involves an instant-by-instant charting of the behaviour of an object. The panoramic view, on the other hand, reveals not only a complete picture of the actual behaviour of an object but also all the possible routes of development connecting an initial situation with a final situation. From the panoramic view, each route between the two situations is characterized by a specific numerical quantity called its action. Action may be thought of as twice the average kinetic energy of the system multiplied by the time interval between the initial and final position under study or, again, as the average momentum of the system multiplied by the length of the path between the initial and final positions.
The value of the action for any actual motion of a system between two configurations is always a minimum or a maximum. In most instances, the behaviour of the system follows the path of minimum, or least, action. In an optical system, such as a microscope, light travels along the path of least action as it undergoes bending in the lenses. For light, action is proportional to the time of travel, so that the light travels the path that takes the least time.
With the beginning of quantum theory (1900), the concept of action took on a new importance. In describing the behaviour of molecular or atomic particles, one had to invoke a previously unsuspected restriction. Only those states of motion are possible in which actions are whole-number multiples of a certain very small number, known as Planck’s constant, named for the German scientist Max Planck, who first proposed a discrete, or quantized, behaviour for objects of subatomic dimensions. Thus Planck’s constant is the natural unit, or quantum, of action. But in T.œ, h, is the quanta of space of the ∆-1 scale, and so it appears in the different vital, a,e,i,o,u actions of the entity. The mathematical concept of action in physics, e x i thus is of little use in t.œ’s description of actions, but of course h-planck as the minimal quanta of space or ‘Planckton’ is essential to Physical systems.
4 type of vibrations organize a social molecule.
4 nucleotide acids code the vital actions of the cell:
And 4 drives of existence – feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially – explain the game of life.
Now, the study of the ‘Program of Existence’ is an enormously extended field, and so we must consider for the reader not to loose its ‘mind’ (-; on such vast field, which encompasses all the åctions and events of the Universe, only a few generic elements in ∆ST, which are latter studied in detail for each species, as in the aforementioned cases of the 4 quantum numbers. 4 genetic letters, 4 biological drives and 4 Maxwell equations.
Thus, immediately the reader would realize that according to the duality between ‘the thoughts of God’ (∆ST) and its details (all the different sciences) 2 are the main sub-disciplines of this field of knowledge are:
– The study of the 4 drives of existence for each species of the Universe. This should be realized in each science, as an introductory course that embeds the science in ∆ST
– The study of the interåctions, synchronicities, order and relationship between the 4 drives and its generic laws for all systems. This second field is the purpose of this post.
Thus for all said, it is quite evident that along the study of the topologies in space and ages in time, the study of the åctions is the 3rd most important isomorphism of the universe.
The 5 åctions in humans and other species.
In the graph the systems of humans to develop its actions, which are the senses, openings to the 3 digestive: energetic, blood: reproductive and brain: informative main systems (divided by the ternary principle in 3 more subsystems) that define the human being and its ‘energetic’, ‘informative’ and reproductive actions, below the social actions mediated by memes, most often of eusocial love religions, today translated into laws of equality, fraternity and solidarity. As we are also code by memetic and genetic systems of actions.
There is A 5D deeper understanding in philosophical terms on the manner in which form and motion transcends through scales to be perceived by the human being, and why we only perceive those scales – namely because they are the ones we act upon. So we can build a human being as the sum of all those åctions across all its scales we perceive, from where an entire understanding of the program of existence of man, our will and what is ‘life and existence’ for us can be deduced.
This connects with the order of those åctions as a pyramid of ‘desires’, we do have a Maslow-like pyramid of åctions which emerge and require the previous one: to perceive we must move towards the perceived system, to feed we must perceive the food and move to it, to reproduce we need enough energy and genetic information in our body. And obviously to evolve socially we must reproduce previously.
And since creation of social, organic networks, requires all other åctions, it is the summit of the ‘program’ of the ‘biological’ Universe that all its species follow.
In the graph that opens this we see the concept of åctions applied to all systems. It is a decade old graph, when I omitted a-motions, the lowest action and included generations, an action above the ∆+1 scale, mixture of the reproductive and social actions.
Yet since now I consider ∆+1 generations, as part of Time Theory (evolution in ∆+1 planes), and have changed my consideration of ∆-4 accelerations as part of Space theory, we could exchange those åctions. i am not doing so much corrections for laziness and also to show the ‘continuity’ of the whole Universe.
The choice though comes from the philosophical considerations:
‘An action requires a conscious will by the individual 0-point of the system which performs it’.
In that regard, the choice is ambivalent, but motion seems to be more conscious than the passing of multiple generations, which beyond reproduction is not an individual action. Of course, ∆ST is a perfect structured Universal order created not by humans, but by Reality and my perception of it has improved with time. Still the graph is a nice portrait of what åctions are in multiple planes of existence, performed by many ∆-species.
ACTIONS EXPRESS THE GENERATOR EQUATION: PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE
Deduction of åctions from the metric of the 5th dimension and the existential force .
We can also consider åctions from the perspective of the ∆-metric, as an ‘existential mandate, which all systems make explicit in his languages:
Grow and multiply: Max. [∑ Sp x Tƒ]∆±4 ->Sp≈Tƒ
It is obvious then that åctions of Energy and Information exchanges bring finally social wholes.
The equation expresses them all:Spatial Motion and Energy feeding are the Sp related åctions, Perception of form, Tƒ, and iteration through a language of genetic information, i, are the two åctions related to Tƒ and i. And finally Social evolution, Max. ∑, is the 5th action. Actions thus are born of the survival program of the existential force of a system and its organic structure.
We can in that sense consider primary, external; secondary, internal and complementary åctions.
All complementary entities displace a particle/head that gauge information over an energy body/field directing its åctions, which are MOTIONS WITH FORM, e x Tƒ events that combine the 2 elements of reality.
What are the types and purpose of those åctions?
If we depart from 2 motions, energy and information, expansive and implosive motions, we can combine try to obtain more of them in ONLY 5 Invariant åctions:
∆a: The simplest one motion, which accelerates, reaches a steady state and decelerates in its 3 ‘ages’ (external motion). But we could also can be considered to be internal motion, of generational ages (the one represented on the graph). What defines in that sense ‘motions’ is the limited capacity of the ‘∆-being’ to modify it.
– ∆e (feeding) on energy to create the structural pieces of the body/wave.
– ∆œ: SxT: Reproductive Communication; SxT: creation of complementary systems, which sometimes we group together as ‘present’ reproductive åctions.
Energy feeding and reproduction are mixed åctions since they process both energy and form, so they are secondary åctions. Perception and motion are pure Sp an Tƒ åctions.
– Social Actions; ∆û.
There are different åctions in society according to which scale we relate and the languages we use.
there are 3 types of languages, ∏-temporal genetic, ∑-spatial and ⊕, organic social growth in the final stage of the S9=∆+1 creation of a Universal through Social scales.
∏Tƒ creation of genetic informative networks, in which all systems are connected, for simpler societies.
∑Sp: energy herding in the same scale over a extended spatial word…
⊕ Se Tƒ; the more complex societies, which signifies the creation of networks and social classes, the informative upper, reproductive body and energetic classes, distinguished by its degree of connectedness.
Since in the upper class, each ‘neuron/particle’ communicates with all others, through its axons/bosons, forming a ‘whole’ new ∆+1 unit (hence the multiplicative symbol as axons are the square of its neurons).
On the other hand, the ∑-scale of reproductive individuals is only connected to their spatial neighbors (and their genetic families). Thus it is easier for the far more connected neuronal caste to control its body herds of loose cells/atoms with those ‘axons/cyclical waves’. And it does so with nervous messages, invaginating the lower ∆-1 chemical language of cells with nervous receptors, or the gravitational with electromagnetic waves.
Finally the quanta of the energy level is disconnected and easy prey for the body herds.
Unlike disconnected quanta or herding of parallel quanta in the same ∆-plane by simple communication with neighbors to maintain distances, or reproduction of a wave that imprints its form in a lower scale, ∆-1, network creation is multiplicative, ∏, as the number of axons is a potency law of its neurons and this makes it more powerful. Since it has a faster language to connect at the ∆+1 scale, but a potency of its numbers communicating in the lower chemical scale in neurons or gravitatomagnetic language in physical systems.
Thus as we see the field of åctions analysis gets more complex in terms of information when we study the higher åctions. And it gets more mathematical when we study lower åctions.
An exhaustive analysis of all events and åctions of all systems, from the 4+1 quantum åctions-numbers of particles to the 5 drives of existence of biological beings to the 5 quantum åctions of humans, show that all systems try to maximize its 5 survival åctions, according to the sequential and frequency laws aforementioned, creating a ‘Maslow pyramid’ of behavior for all of them – the program of the Universe.
The 5th action, though is often unwanted and hence not considered in most scientific studies, because it is most often imposed externally by the ∆+1 neuronal/informative, ‘superior’ species that absorbs the energy of the lower herd treated as energy. So it is not a ‘quantum number’ but the action of informative quarks that capture electrons to form the atomic organism.
It is not a human action, but the imposition of people-castes that control our languages of information (politicians with laws, bankers with money) and create states and markets that control and absorb our wealth. It is not the desire of cells in a multicellular organism, which are controlled in motion and information by neurons.
– Tƒ maximize your existence, Max. ∑Sp∆-1 <=>Tƒ∆+1, the simplest strategy is to maximize the components of the equation, the 4 positive arrows-åctions: Sp=energy feeding, I=information processing, <=> or X, Reproduction and ∑, social evolution and the selfless action of giving away your energy to sustain a ‘higher plane of forms’, which can be observed in the sacrifice of individuals from their nations, their subconscious collective Gods, or in physical space in the loss of form of individual orbitals when the pi or sigma molecular orbitals appear, or the transfer of energy from electric to magnetic fields and so on.
– This gives birth to the duality of ‘social arrows’, as the 4D arrow of herding among clone cells/waves to create ‘spaces’ (defined by Riemann as groups of ‘similar points’ described by properties of continuity, etc.’) might be called in mystique terms the arrow of ‘democratic, social love’ and extract and ethic generalization: forms that feel equal act in parallel and love each other; while the 5D arrow is hierarchical, Darwinian, as ‘forms who are different’ prey ‘perpendicularly’ to each other, transferring energy, Sp∆-1>Tƒ from the lower scale to the upper scale and information, Tƒ>Sp∆-1, from the upper to the lower scale. More deductions from the Program:
– You can maximize the function of existence when S=T->Max SxT (mathematical rule: 5×5>9×1).
This is known intuitively, as we say ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’ where Sp(body/field) and I (head/particle).
It is the origin of the need to have our vital constants in balance, of the balance of Universal Constants, which are Sp/O or SxT ratios (as in the equations of gravitational and electromagnetic constants, where q-m are clocks of information and distances, Sp, hence they write as F=Q,G(Tƒ/Sp).
It explains the attraction of beauty, a shape in which form and energy are balanced, S=T; the beauty of top predator species – a species that maximizes its body force (Sp), intelligence (O) and beauty (S=T), in physical space one with maximal M(T) x V(Sp) momentum, which in physical collisions survives and defines the final trajectory; the classic shapes of the commonest spiral galaxies, etc. It explains why live longer in our mature, S=T, age between energetic youth and informative 3rd age; why death happens by excess of energy (Max. Spin accidents and wars) or information (Max.Tƒ in the 3rd age when we warp and wrinkle); and many other facts.
– You can maximize your existence, when ∑->∞ that explains the huge quanta in spaces that last, from the ultimate vacuum of the Universe to the seas of water, to the power of ∑=Love in social systems, to the undistinguishable boson structures of immortal beings, from light to black holes (bosons of quark stars) to minds – ‘zero points’ that map out with self-similar pixels of information an external Universe into a linguistic infinitesimal image of it – to herds and waves that become tighter, multicellular organisms that survive better.
– It explains the engine of human existence: greed for Sp-food, Information, sex (SxT), 4D-love & 5D-power.
For example, if we are to consider informative systems alone, the creation of a boson, zero point in which an infinite number of self-similar, ∑-forms converge is another path to maximize the function of existence.
Thus the highest of all åctions is the social experience, and we can truly write those åctions in chains from the lowest one – physical motion, to the highest one – social love, reason why people like more prophets than physicists, the maximize more their existence.
So all what species do is: >O: Gauge information; i, herding with parallel beings or SxT, merge into complementary systems; combining those simplex åctions in a single plane, across 3±∆ scales:
– Reproducing self-similar entities: Œ>∑Œ∆-1>œ or evolving socially with them into bigger networks, creating more complex planes of existence, fractal super-organisms: ∑Sp∆-1<=>∏Tƒ
All what any entity including humans do during our entire existence from seminal cell to dying body, all can be explained with those 6 åctions: Feeding, informing, moving, reproducing and networking into social groups.
Further on each of the 5 ‘existential åctions’ form together a causal sequence, as complex åctions need previous simpler ones to ‘exi=st’
. Thus åctions, functions=forms=dimensions & time sequences are related, creating parallel invariances that define each fractal’ diffeomorphic entity or ‘world’ constantly ‘filling’ with those dimensional åctions its vital space, part made to the likeness of the whole Universe:
– ∆ï: Any entity needs first to perceive-gauge information from an advantageous ‘point of view’. So all p.o.v.s, are ‘on top’ in the dimension of height, from heads to antennae to black holes.
-∆A, And then it needs to move changing its trajectory, hence accelerating to get to:
– ∆Sp: Then the entity will move to a field of energy to feed, through its faster lineal path. So ‘length’ becomes the dimension of energy and main body orientation, from ¥-fields to sharks.
– Then we communicate e<= >o with similar beings to herd or reproduce in ‘empty’ regions of space-time, so width becomes the reproductive or communicative 3rd spatial dimension, where we accumulate new cells, send our words as we walk in parallel dimension.
– We observe also those 3 perpendicular dimensions in ¥-light fields, corresponding to their diffeomorphic electric=informative, magnetic= energetic and reproductive c-speed, product of SxT (Maxwell’s equations). Since light is not an abstract, independent space-time background: Our mental space-time is made of ¥-information, so we share its Euclidean 3 Dimensions. Vacuum space is light. So background radiation cannot be extracted: it is space itself.
So the 3 Space-dimensions are functional åctions with a causal sequence:
Informing (Height)Communicating/reproducing (width).
The program of the Fractal Universe and its Generator Equation. The will of Œ superorganisms.
Now if we eliminate the action of motion, for which the organism hardly needs more than limbs to take advantage of the flow of forces, we can search for the ‘inner will’ that motivate those åctions, the coding factors.
The 5th isomorphism of all Œ super organisms is thus their program of existence or 4 Drives of Life, which biology ‘cracked’ regarding the living organisms it studies, since it carries the highest truth of all sciences.
As all isomorphisms, the need of systems to construct its 3±1 common ∆±1 dimensions of scalar space-time, energy limbs/fields/territories, reproductive bodies/waves/working classes & informative particles/heads /upper classes and ∆±1 social scales, determine the 3+1 drives of existence all Nature’s ‘surviving’ systems follow:
– Max.Tƒ: All gauge information with their heads/particles to guide their search for Energy or else they die.
– Max. Sp: All systems feed on energy with limbs/fields. Since if they don’t, they become exhausted and die.
– Sp x TƒSp=Tƒ: All reproduce/iterate/decouple into new organisms and particles. Since, as they are limited in time duration, if they don’t repeat their topologic structures they become extinct.
– ∑Sp, ∏Tƒ: All evolve socially into higher systems and associate with similar forms; whereas simple ‘energy beings/cells’ form ∑=herds, simply connected to hunt and feed; while complex, ‘informative beings/neurons’ form complex networks, in which each individual is connected to all others. Hence the ∏-multiplicative symbol counts not the informative neurons but the connective axons that make efficient ∏-networks dominate ∑-herds.
Thus we rewrite scalar Space-time Metric as a Fractal generator of the ∞ Wills of the Universe, which encodes all the isomorphisms, parts, events and scales of all its Œ superorganisms: ∞ ∑Sp∆-1 ≤ ST∆ ≥ ∏Tƒ∆+1
The Generator equation’s 3±∆ symbols describe the fundamental particle of reality, its 3±1 Wills & ternary structure, both in time and space: a cellular, social, ternary organism, each one distinguished by a balanced set of Sp≈Tƒ vital, biologic or universal, physical constants, which freeze the energy and information of the being into stable, balanced proportions, which define a specific variety or ‘species’ of the fractal generator.
So we can translate all ‘laws’ of the different scales and species of all scalar sciences, and the ‘parts’ of its organisms, as events related to the 3±∆ ‘drives of existence’ of the Generator Equation of all systems. It is then possible to generate all what is real, departing from the Generator, the symmetries and Constant proportions among the 10Dis of reality and the laws of i-logic mathematics, as this writer has done in his research.
THE HIERARCHY, SINCHRONICITY AND CYCLICAL CHAINS OF ACTIONS.
Åctions are ordered also in time, parallel to its symmetry in scales – relationship that between time ages and ∆-scales we have observed already in the study of the meaning of past, present and future, now further proved through the order of åctions:
Well it is not the same order than the vowels but almost (-;
Synchronicities of knots of time arrows.
Finally another theme of importance regarding action, which we treat in other sections, mainly in time and planes are its synchronicity between planes, as the smallest åctions are faster and repeat more, so we do more ‘gravitational steps for each second-perception, and feed only once a day reproduce once a year and evolve socially through our entire life. This is the most important reason for the order of the organic systems of reality.
For example, the faster åctions of cells (i.e. daily reproduction) are synchronized to the slower energy feeding cycle of its ∆+1 scale, which gives the energy it needs to put its information at work and enable the reproduction.
it also follows that the emergence of an action above, makes it a product of the lower ones Ao(∆-3) x Ae (∆-2) = Œ∆-1
That is the cell takes its genetic, information coded in a few atoms, the energy obtained from above and reproduces the system.
Each active organism is a complex chain of cyclical åctions performed to achieve the 4 main arrows of time. Yet that chaos of action is ordered by causal processes, synchronized clocks and ‘—motions’/information networks that harmonize all those seemingly chaotic cycles of åctions into a dance of existential beats, interdependent and in permanent symbiosis – being the key to those harmonies among different Time Arrows the concept of ‘time-speed’, the speed at which a certain cycle of time closes its trajectory into a ‘loop’ or event (spatial/temporal description) that will be repeated with a frequency that defines the regularity of the time cycle and its speed of perception.
For example, the subjective cycle of time perception in man is the cycle of informative perception determined by the wink of the eye which opens to absorb ‘—motions’ and closes when it processes it as information every second. This rhythm is self-similar to the rhythm of the heart, which is approximately of a beat per second, when blood is expanded as ‘—motions’ and imploded carrying the released chemical information of the body. So, since we have a thought per second and a beat per second, the second is in fact the ‘clock-time’ of the human brain and the mechanical instruments we use to compare all the cycles of time of the Universe with our own cycles.
Each species and cycle of time has a different frequency, which depends on the ‘size’ of the species we study, and the causality of those arrows, such as:
Max. ‘—motions’-extension=Min. Speed-Frequency of Time cycles:
Max. Speed/frequency: Informative cycle->Energetic ->Reproductive ->Social cycle: Min. Frequency.
For example, the cycle of perception of the human eye – each second –determines the beat of the heart/breathing cycle of ‘—motions’ for the body; the cycle of rotation of the Sun-Earth system – a day – determines the ‘—motions’ cycle of the planetary surface, whose microscopic, life-species adjust their energetic /formative, awaken/sleep cycle to that of the bigger organism. And vice versa, the smaller microscopic cells of the body reproduce each day, according to that awaken/sleep cycle. There are in fact a series of General Isomorphisms of synchronicity between those Time Arrows/cycles that apply to any entity or complex system of the Universe, which extends through several scales of spatial size and informative complexity.
All the åctions of all species can in fact be described by ‘beats’ of existence, partial sub-equations of the Generator Equation, which define rhythmical chains of action. In an individual those beats of existence become the life rhythms of each of our organs, from the eye that feeds on light and then informs the brain, which produces a visual thought every second (the blink time of the eye), (o->e->o) to the night/day, dreaming/acting rhythm (Release of chemical information->dreaming->release of ‘—motions’->acting), etc.
A 2nd series of ternary rhythms occur as organisms switch between the 3 physiological networks of hormonal, reproductive activity; nervous, informative activity and feeding, energetic activity (Re->in->en).
Those rhythms happen also in the social scale of existence as a single organism, cell of our civilizations. In society those rhythms shape the ternary bio-rhythms of our daily life; the 8 hours of work (obtaining our social ‘—motions’, money), 8 hours of play (dedicated to family reproduction), and 8 hours of sleep (when our organism repairs its form). Moreover those rhythms of our daily life are synchronous to the rhythms of the global organism, Gaia; and self-similar rhythms are found in the activity of animals and plants.
Since in objective terms humans are created by the same temporal arrows and display the same properties than the rest of the entities of the Universe. A human being is the same kind of entity than ‘an atom’ – a complex chain of time cycles of ‘—motions’, information, reproduction and social evolution. The difference is not of quality but of quantity and hence of complexity: Humans are knots of an enormous amount of time cycles whose spatial topologies, åctions and motions configure our existence.
On the other extreme of simplicity, an atomic particle (quark, electron or photon) is the simpler species, we can study with those arrows, in terms of size and complexity of its ‘action’ cycles, compared to a human being. Since a particle can be described with just 4 quantum numbers that resume the 4 kinds of ‘åctions’ particles constantly perform:
– Particles gauge information (reason why quantum theory is a ‘gauge theory’). That is, they calculate the distances with other atoms and act-react to exchanges of ‘—motions’ and information with them.
– Particles feed on ‘—motions’, absorbing electromagnetic and gravitational forces and other particles.
– Particles decouple, repeating themselves in other regions of space-time (they reproduce by iterating its particles, quarks, electrons and photons).
– Finally particles evolve together into complex social structures, called atoms and molecules, which also feed on ‘—motions’, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially.
All those ‘motions’, quantum numbers, molecular vibrations, decouplings and physical events can be re-considered as manifestations of the 4 main arrows of time, chained in synchronic patterns and cycles, cyclical and lineal geometries, whose abstract definition conform the Isomorphisms of quantum physics.
The description physicists do of those arrows is an abstract, mathematical, mechanical description, which corresponds to the limits of the mechanical, monist, ‘religious’ philosophy of science of our founding fathers4, which did not require an ‘internal’, self-organizing will to describe the Universe, since it was understood that the ‘will’, the ‘why’ of all the clock-like motions of the Universe was ‘God’, an entity that seems to have appeared to a pastor of the bronze age.
System sciences reasons those ultimate questions from the perspective of science and its mathematical and logic languages, albeit with a degree of complexity superior to that provided by monist, reductionist, mechanist, classic scientific philosophies of reality. Thus we substitute the ‘will of a personal God’ or any other anthropic principle with the 4 objective ‘arrows of causality’ or Time Arrows that all particles and entities of ‘existence’ follow, which can be described objectively with mathematical and logical equations, and finds in the subjective will for survival its sufficient reason.
Further on, all quantum entities obey the Complementarity Principle. They show 2 states or structures that co-exist simultaneously: a field of energetic forces that moves a particle of information, which gauges the space-time that surrounds the particle. And we cannot distinguish or perceive both entities: the force/body and head/particle together. In other words, physical entities are made of ‘motion fields’ and ‘gauging particles’.
They constantly move, stop and gauge information, move, gauge… So because they have 2 components, one specialized in energetic motions (the field of forces) and one specialized in informative gauging (the particle, mass or charge), all their åctions are either ‘energetic åctions’, informative gauging, the combinations of both type of åctions (decouplings, which produce self-similar particles) or more complex åctions in which the particle, atom or molecule share smaller particles, called bosons, creating social networks, made of fields of forces and particles of information.
If we widen the concept of ‘—motions’ as lineal, expansive motion, and information as a cyclical, in/formative motion, we realize that the biological realm also follows a Principle of Complementarity between reproductive bodies and informative heads, which co-exist together in living beings. And bodies are responsible for ‘—motions’, while heads map out the Universe, creating images, reflected in the mind of the external motions of reality, imitated by small cyclical motions within the brain and its neurons. So again we observe a dual structure, body/head, with energetic/informative properties that move and gauge, feed on ‘—motions’ and perceive information. And in more complex events, reproduce the biological entity or use languages of information to create complex social structures.
All what exists is a ‘fractal knot of ‘—motions’ and information motions’, whose why is ‘to absorb more ‘—motions’ and information’ from the perspective of the entity or ‘point of view’ that gauge and moves in the Universe. Imagine a universe of infinite ‘species’ made of ‘‘—motions’’, ‘forces or bodies’, upon which certain structures of information, called ‘cyclical motions’, particles or heads, are sustained. Reality is a fractal sum of those 2 motions, ‘—motions’ and information, which combine to create an infinite number of entities that gauge information, feed on ‘—motions’, reproduce their form and evolve into social structures till reaching the complex Universe.
We cannot describe human åctions with simple equations because humans can gauge many types of information, feed in many forms of different ‘—motions’, choose many different couples to court, love and reproduce, and make very complex choices in our decisions on how to relate socially to other human beings. But at the end of the journey, amazingly enough we observe that all what we humans do is also gauging information, absorbing ‘—motions’, reproducing and evolve into social systems. So those 4 types of events or causal arrows of time are all what we humans do; even if we use a complex, ‘ambiguous’ language – words -to describe those åctions.
Tƒ exist, to be in this Universe means to absorb ‘—motions’, gauge information, reproduce our form and evolve socially by acts of communication with other beings. Those ‘åctions’ are considered mechanical in the physical world and åctions of will in the human world. Yet they are described in both worlds with the same ‘2 elements’: ‘—motions’ and clocks of time. So Planck proved that all physical forces are made of h-quanta, whose parameters are ‘‘—motions’ and time’, while we say in layman terms that ‘we do not have enough time and ‘—motions’ to do this’ – meaning we are made of a limited quantity of vital space, our ‘—motions’/body, and time-clocks of information – our minds.
There is no difference between ‘us’, human beings and ‘particles’ that also have a limited ‘—motions’ and time, which they spend performing the same game of 4 types of åctions – the Game of Existence. We all play the same game, regardless of what plays it, an atom, or a human being.
Religions will tell you that the ‘will’ of man is a property of ‘our soul’, which is supposed to exist according to the tradition of our ‘pious’ founding father, Mr. Descartes, in some non-local space-time4. Stience will tell you that the ‘will of man’ is the ‘why’ we don’t ask, or at best it will be born of a chaotic series of circumstances and physical events that come together to ‘create life’. While biologists will affirm that the will of man has the same drives of existence (gauging, feeding, reproducing and evolving socially) that all forms of life have, but only forms of life have.
System sciences depart from anthropomorphic traditions, validating instead the ideas of Eastern philosophies (Taoism, Buddhism, Zurvanism), upgraded with the scientific method, showing that the Universe is ‘organic’, not mechanical, because all its particles share the ‘4 drives of existence’ of biological beings, whose ‘why’ is self-evident in a world made of perpetual motions. Since if we all are made of motions, life is embedded in the existence of those motions that repeat themselves by the mere ‘action of moving’: Reproduction becomes natural to the existence itself of cyclical and ‘—motions’ that repeat their forms as they trace their trajectories.
If we leave aside metaphysical, subjective questions on the ‘nature of consciousness’ and ‘will’, we could affirm that all entities of the Universe have both, a ‘will of existence’, shown in its constant pursuit of those 4 arrows, and an objective nature, in as much as those 4 arrows or wills can be proved objectively by the events that atoms, humans, animals or any other entity perform. It is though necessary to understand in which scale of reality a certain region of Time-space ‘acts’. For example, a chair, made with human formal imagination is not organic neither it shows any of the 4 main arrows of time unless it is attached to a human being (so it helps humans to think- process information – in a ‘still’, formal position). Yet at the spatial scale of atomic wood, the chair shows those arrows and in the temporal distance when the chair was wood, it had also at macroscopic level those vital arrows of time.
What is then reality – the ultimate meaning of those time arrows? At first sight, it seems there is no meaning at all, but merely the eternal beat of existence, ‘—motions’ becoming form, becoming ‘—motions’… and the sensations related to those motions, which might be shared by all realities – pain/pressure and pleasure/release.
A closer view on both arrows and the complementarity of all physical and biological entities, which achieve immortality through reproduction of their own form – from light imprinting its waves on the vacuum, to quarks jetting bundles of ‘quarkitos’, to humans ‘growing and multiplying’ all over the Earth – seemingly makes the 3rd existential arrow of reproduction, the meaning of it all, and the Universe a constant orgasm of repetitive, present forms.
But then, we realize that reproduction in itself is just a step towards self-organization, as self-similar cells that can ‘decode’ their common language of information come together into stronger, bigger waves, herds and organisms, which survive better, due to their higher ∑SxT, existential force. So the answer to the meaning of it all is clear: the Universe has a dominant arrow, the creation of ‘fractal superorganisms’, species which are self-similar to their parts and emerge through processes of evolution into bigger wholes.
Since the 4 main arrows of time and its discontinuous cycles come together, creating vital knots of motions that energize, gauge information, reproduce and finally evolve socially into herds and organisms: T->S->ST->S. In other words, a fractal infinite Universe of ‘—motions’ and information struggles to create ‘more of it’ by expanding inwards and outwards its relative scales of organic size; since a Universe made of motions has no limits of size and form, as it becomes ever more organized in bigger and smaller social herds and organisms: T->S->ST->S.
Yet even if social evolution is the dominant arrow of the Universe, it is also the less common, more distanced in the frequency of its events, since all other arrows must exist ‘a priori’ for an event of social evolution – the final causal arrow of reality – to take place, thanks to a common language that carries information among self-similar cellular individuals.
The highest frequency of events always corresponds to informative events, particles and heads gauging and thinking, mapping reality with its hardware, as they run inside the software of a force, whose frequency carries informations decoded and transferred into such mappings. So the atom figures out first in its inner quark-systems how to move, searching for a flow of ‘—motions’ or its relocation in harmony with the other atoms of its web, while an office clerk thinks first and then writes or makes a call related to those informative thoughts – an act of measure precedes an act of motion.
Accordingly to those frequencies and the generic law, Min.Sp= Max.Tƒ, the light pixels of informative mappings are smaller and faster to allow faster events/cycles of perception than the bits of ‘—motions’ that feed the body – amino acids, which are smaller than the seminal cells that carry the information of reproductive acts, which are smaller than the units of social evolution (other humans).
So happens to the frequency of perception (each second), faster than that of feeding, which happens more often than the frequency of sexual reproduction, which is more common than our acts of love – social acts of evolution that ‘collapse’ a wave of individuals into a particle/organism, emerging as a whole action, born of the self-organization of its parts, such as a religious mass or a voting action, or a marriage, all acts that create social groups.
Yet, the ultimate why of any chain of causal Time Arrows must be found in the goal of ‘survival’, the final drive of all entities of the Universe, maximized by its 2 complex arrows, reproduction and social evolution that evolves cellular entities into macrocosmic wholes, which become cellular entities of a higher ‘space-time plane’.
What we are then can be expressed in more poetic terms: knots of existence, flows of arrows of time, mirrors of information, bodies in action, ‘wills of the penis’14, loving cells of bigger social units, exi=stential flows, ‘vanitas, vanitatum et omnia vanitates’; motions of time in perpetual conflict.
The rules of engagement of all those knots of time, ‘points of view’ that gauge information, seek for ‘—motions’, reproduce and evolve socially, creating ‘ad eternal’ the infinite scales upwards and inwards, is the ultimate knowledge of the game of existence, which system sciences study.
This holistic view is a mystique revealing existence of the unity of it all, which few self-centered humans accept. Scientists rejected it in the past, because it had not been properly formalized. But one of the advantages of the new formalism of Non-Euclidean, fractal, logic, causal chains of Time Arrows/events, is that it renders a mathematical analysis of those arrows of times are its generic isomorphisms, hence allowing their application to the study of the species of any scientific network of self-similar points in an open flow of communication.
Thus, the range and power of the formalism of Multiple Spaces-Times will not become evident till we develop the logic of multiple causes and the non-Euclidean geometry of flows of communication between the fundamental particles of the Universe, its non-Euclidean, Fractal points. A consequence of those postulates is in fact the definition of a soul as a non-Euclidean point of view:
‘Every point of view=mind feels the center of the Universe, but it is only an infinitesimal Non-Euclidean point that stores a limited mapping of reality with its informative languages.’
We are all Atmans, informative CPUs, souls that gauge in different languages reality, to construct a mental mapping that caters to our point of view and arrows of time. So we create our ‘perceived Universe’ – a fact known from Descartes to Schopenhauer, but lost to ‘naïve, realist’ physicists. All of them thinking clocks are the only point that matters to measure time, and the human mind, the only ego that knots ‘—motions’ into form, since that is the only perspective they perceive. That is why most of history, humans thought the Earth to be the center of reality; and still think they are the only intelligent species.
All is memorial because cyclical inertia, the repetition of the cycles of existence of any form, is common to all space-time fields. This is a tautology: a species that forgets, that does not repeat a fractal cycle of existence becomes extinct and its cycles of existence disappear. Thus, a being has to remember and repeat its fractal cycles to last in time. That is the existential game of any being: to feed on ‘—motions’ and use its genetic, memorial information to transform it through reproduction into new cyclical åctions.
Yet those åctions are encoded in ‘fractal equations of information’ which are logical chains that constantly repeat themselves, becoming memorial patterns. Those patterns have different names in science: genes in biology, memes in history, Universal constants, which are proportions between physical ‘—motions’ and information in physics, etc. Yet what all those fractal equations and e/o proportions become are cyclical, self-repetitive events that respond to an arrow of time.
Recap: All what exi=st is a fractal knot of cycles of ‘—motions’, information, reproduction and social evolution. There is not a difference of quality among universal entities – only a difference in the quantity and complexity of those cyclical arrows that ‘inform’ each species of reality. The ultimate meaning of a Universe made of time motions not of spatial forms is closer to a Philosophical tradition that ranges from Plato and Buddha to Leibniz and Schopenhauer: reality is a game of ‘fractal mirrors’, souls=Atmans= quantum knots of information that gauge reality to absorb ‘—motions’ in order to repeat=iterate=reproduce their form. Since we are all fractal parts of the whole with a limited duration in time and a limited quantity of space. And so only those species, which reproduce their ‘logic arrows’ of time, their information, in other zone of space survive. Thus the game of existence is in essence a game of repetition of forms, a game of exi=stences.
The first rhythm: motion and perception, ∆ï, ∆a
In the graph, the order of actions always starts from a o-point of view or informative brain system, attached to a sensorial membrane, which divides the system in the outer and inner world (left point), and starts to interact with other fractal points to develop its actions.
So let us start with the first two words.
If you ask me what is the Universe i would tell you look at its rhythms, it is this beat you hear everywhere, this stop and go motion, motion and form, still and moving, decelerating accelerating, steady state, beat, beat, and rhythms all over the place. And so we call the motions time, and the forms space, and the go time and the stop space, and the stillness of the mind safe, and the rhythms of the body time, and time and space, that’s all.
All there is to it, the rhythms of time and space:
Stop (S) < Go (Time) > Die (space) < Live (time)≈Move≈ Accelerate (Vortex of Time) < Stop (Space)…
in all its infinite varieties the rhythms of space-time broken in infinite strings, knotted in infinite minds of cycles command, form and deform, inform and r=evolve, dissolve, exist. And this tapestry of Existence is what we call the Universe:
±∆ Sp(Go-Feed) x Tƒ (Stop-Reproduce) =ST
The mixture of motions of time and forms of space, of stop and go motions and dimensions, their intertwined intelligent, is what it is all about.
We shall call any mixture of at least a motion of time and a dimension of space, an action of space-time, the fundamental ‘quanta-bit’ of reality, its minimal, ‘infinitesimal’, perceivable, as pure time and pure space are not.
The meaning of reality thus becomes apparent when we go beyond the simplest description of its topological, physical properties as a series of time motions that mess with spatial forms to create bidimensional membranes, which magically construct frozen space-time topologies with functions. Where is the intelligence? now we know: in the meaning of those åctions, which is a biological program.
In the next posts we shall develop the mixture of biological and topological i-logic properties that defines the game of existence, here we shall define the game.
All systems of spatial energy and temporal information, guided by a zero-point, the most perfect spherical geometry, or monad of the system, O-point x ∞ Universe = Θ Still mind of reality, show a will: SURVIVAL.
And survival has an easy mathematical expression in a Universe made of 2 formal motions and its combinations, Ox|=Ø:
absorb and emit energy and information. Those are thus the rules, ±∆e x i… Maximize a simple function of existence of your energetic and informative, spatial and temporal parts playing the game of survival called LIFE.
Because indeed, what the åctions of energy feeding, energy expelling=moving, information expelling=reproducing and communicating and information absorbing=perceiving causes is a game of existence equal to what biologists define as life, a game of moving, reproducing feeding and perceiving.
That’s all there is to it space-time has a vital nature. And the åctions of space-time which ‘truly exist’, as they are by definition that limiting present thin line… show it in detail.
We thus call the 5 åctions of the Universe, ∆e=feeding, -∆e=moving, ∆ï=observing, -∆œ:reproducing and U=∆+1, social evolution into higher planes of space-time, the game of existence:
Tƒ < ExI=ST is then a curious acronym with an artistic, ideographic flavor. Tƒ is the O-point, the head, < the neck, its communication with the body, ExI, the place of present existence, the wave that reproduces its energy and information, as it evolves and r=evolves and moves through a social Plane, its Universal, Its ST world.
The interaction of all those arrows of time through space-time åctions require though the introduction of a ‘point of view’ or frame of reference, which will give organic meaning to that series of arrows and cycles of time, creating the knots of time, or existential points that carry the program of the Universe as they give survival meaning to the åctions and cycles knotted within the point:
THUS if we do a qualitative analysis things remain simple, as it is the program of survival of the universe, the ultimate why of all existences – simple enough to be just åctions of absorption of (kinetic) energy and in-Form-ation.
And this which is a trend of all T.Œ, complexity ultimately can be reduced to the dualities, ternary elements and 4 Dimensional simplex åctions of the Universe.
Further on, those space-time åctions communicate an Œ, point of existence, which ultimately is a knot of åctions, with its external world. So those åctions of communication of information (i), bring about the more complex åctions of the Universe, which we gather in the process of eusocial evolutions from ∏ Œ∆-1 points into U∆, Universals.
This process, we study as the creation of a ‘higher, bigger scale’ of existence, and hence implies two new type of complex åctions:
- Present reproduction of the system, ∆Œ and…
- Future, social evolution into Universals through the creation of complex herds that become super organisms.
In that sense the finality of the Universe is not the survival of the individual but the creation of complex social systems, caused by the complex åctions, for which simplex åctions seems a mere preparation, hence the ‘pinnacle’ of existence is to form part and create a ‘social world’, an ∆+1 Universal, the dissolution of the ego of individual points into the collective.
In that sense, since both, the absorption and emission of bits of information and ‘bites’ of energy happens across ∆-scales (we like to call those quanta of information, bits, acronym also for bidimensional manifolds of space-time information, and bites, bits with energy :), the 3rd fundamental element of Action ‘Theory’ is the study of 5D processes of emission and absorption of smaller bits and bites of information and energy by a higher social organisms of an upper plane of the Universe.
Thus the study of simplex, ±e,i åctions, of the codes of each species that program them to follow those survival åctions; of the higher game of social reproduction and evolution that creates Universals, and the interaction of the being which performs those åctions with lower bits and bites and bigger social wholes, becomes the fundamental experimental and theoretical combined space-time analysis of any species.
Actions are on that regard along with super organisms in the larger ST-Plane, the ‘flesh’ of the Universe…
The two levels of complexity of Universal åctions.
Thus to resume that dual ‘build-up’ program of existence, we can write an equation of existential algebra: ∫ ±∆ e, i ds dt= Wu.
That is, the sum of all the simplex åctions of the being, integrated along its vital ‘cellular’ space, ds, and its whole duration in time, dt, gives us a Universal Organism in space, U, that goes through a world cycle in time, ω, throughout all its existence, in which it will live, might reproduce in other space-time, elongating its function of existence into the future, and then die.
Now existential algebra is a logic interpretation of the space-time events of the universe, so we do not need at this state to know what we are representing. That equation can represent the life of a star, a human being, a cell, the extension of a electromagnetic field, a ‘finite fractal space-time’ reality. It represents merely one of the many ways to analyze the synoptic ‘generator equation’, Sp≈Tƒ, in terms of space-time åctions, world cycles and super organisms:
Once a series of simplex ±∆e,i åctions are performed, the Uw game represents a second level of complexity in which åctions are combined into space-time knots, œ, which communicate with and reproduce similar beings, evolving socially into Universals.
Thus, this second ‘layer of complexity’ of the being, creates new planes of the 5th dimension as the reproduction and social evolution of those œ-points creates from parts the wholes of reality. And so we talk of a ‘second’ complex beat of existence:
REPRODUCTION- Œ: WHOLE CREATION: ∑>U
Thus the scalar Universe is an ‘architectonical, dynamic, nested, integrative, Russian Doll’:
The sum of ±e,i, åctions do bring together sequentially in time, accumulated socially in space, the reproduction and creation of Universal Organisms. And so we talk of 2 final åctions, iteration by reproduction of communication and social evolution of parts into Universals, which would complete at a higher 5D level the existence of the being.
The sequential order of åctions is transmitted to world cycles of life and death.
Thus Changes of motion or acceleration, ∆a, absorption of energy, ∆e, of information, ∆ï, communication and iteration of information ∆œ and social evolution that unites individuals into Universals, ∆u, brings all together nicely in a 5 vowel system, of increasing complexity in the åctions of beings, which first:
->+∆ï observe a field of energy ->∆a move towards it ->∆e absorb energy -> ∆ï communicate with other beings to hunt in herds, or ∆œ, reproduce the inner information starting an iterative clone flow, which -> ∆U, will evolve socially.
So we talk of simplex chains of åctions, ∆ï-∆a-∆e and complex changes Œ-∆U (communication, reproduction and social evolution), and it is clear that in the first change ‘energy’ dominates and in the second change ‘information’ is all.
Now, the reader should observe that the simplex åctions of the first scale roughly order themselves as the world cycles do. So it is the emergence of the sum of infinitesimal åctions, what creates the order of the 3 ages of life in the larger super organism total existence.
Actions across multiple chains of existence.
How can we differentiate the 2 complex åctions of reproductive iteration and Universals evolution – the åctions, which do imply massive motions across ∆-planes of the 5th dimension?
We integrate both, in the symbol U, and study apart the way in which systems ‘iterate’ its forms across different planes of existence.
On the other hand Actions are always exchanges of energy and information between two ∆-∆ planes of existence. And so there are 5 åctions:
Social relationships between i<-i(∆=0): Au. Seminal seeds: ∆->∆-1 (∆=1): AI
Energy feeding: ∆->∆-2: Ae. Informative perception: ∆->∆-3: Ao; and changes in motion: ∆-∆-4: Aa.
Actions thus require to understand the other form of travel through the 5th dimension – not a temporal travel through the ages of evolution, in which the whole system is carried through the metric of the 5th dimension; but a travel that involves only the ‘transfer’ of energy or information, between two poles.
And so we dedicate a whole post, to understand this fundamental element of the 5th dimension: transfer of ‘Spatial Momentum’ Sp, or Spatial Energy, Sp between two planes and its inverse: transfer of form. In this post we will briefly analyze and classify åctions in physical, biological and social systems, and study the 5 åctions briefly.
Actions in a single plane of existence.
In physics an action is the fundamental present, ST element of the Universe that combines energy and time:
Spe x Tƒ = ST
So for example, a Planck constant is an action of Energy and Time: Ex T = H
We are not using though the same concept in relational space-time, changing in this rare occasion the formula, as we prefer the qualitative concept for action, closer to the sentence that opens this paragraph: ‘don’t confuse motion, Sp, for action: Sp x Tƒ= ST’.
We thus call an action, the quanta of existence, a derivative or ‘unit of force’, which all systems display to exchange energy and information with the environment, to achieve in this manner the 2 higher goals of existence: reproduction and social evolution of parts into wholes, new units of a higher plane of the 5th dimension.
We could consider then all possible ‘åctions’ of past-energy and future-information that combine together. Action is the ‘short’ present dimension, the most complex, rich and important element within a single plane of existence. And the study of this basic concept of physics and its ∆ST equivalent: combinations of form and motion into purposeful åctions is essential to many fields and science.
But probably the man who better understood its concept in the upper scales of life was Hemingway in the above sentence; for an action to be meaningful it must have both motion (P) and form (F), yin and yang, in purposeful combination. Most motions today are confused with åctions – demonstrations without purpose. Social Actions must have a point-like directionality, a form, a goal.
Thus the classic concept of physics and normal language, as when we say, ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this (action)’ do open a wide field of physical, biological and psychological, social analysis.
Actions in multiple planes of existence.
In ∆ST, however we define a much wider concept of an action.
An action in that sense is better understood in normal languages: an action is what all entities of the Universe constantly do. Our program of existence. And it can be mathematically defined with the tools of Existential Algebra. Thus we define an Existential action:
‘ An action is a flow of energy and information between 2 consecutive planes of existence: ∆-∆≤A≥∆-(∆+1) ‘
Since ∆±4 are the planes of existence, it follows that there are only 4 possible Actions.
Thus we divide åctions into 5 fundamental types in which the ∆-being relates through exchanges of energy and information to each of the lower and single scale it perceives.
– We absorb and process energy for our system, ∆Sp, we absorb and process information, ∆ï, we iterate our systems, ∆œ, we socialize in groups, ∆U, and we move around, accelerating and decelerating to do so, ∆A.
And as it happens, we do all that by interacting between our ∆-∆ scale and a higher scale of reality:
We move through ∆-4 gravitational forces, which change our steady state (inertial speed) into acceleration and decelerations: Aa: ∆a(∆-4>∆-3)
We perceive light and electronic quanta to inform ourselves: Ao: ∆ï(∆-3>-2)
We absorb ∆-2 energy quanta (amino acids) to recompose our bodies: Ae: ∆e(∆-2>-1)
We reproduce through ∆-1 seminal seeds which emerge in our scale: Ai: ∆r(∆-1>i)
(and for other species, NOT to provoke the anthropomorphism of humans we talk of iteration in other species, hence we call this action Ai.)
And we socialize with individuals like us creating societies that in its larger form become universal. Au: ∆u(i>∆+1). And that is why all fits nicely.
The æ,e,ï,œ,û of åctions is all what we do.
All what humans and everything else do are varieties of those 5 åctions. So write this 5th isomorphism with another simple equation:
∆a(∆-4>∆-3), ∆ï(∆-3>-2), ∆e(∆-2>-1), ∆œ(∆-1>œ),and ∆u(∑œ>∆+1)
This is the simplest mathematical and conceptual definition of the åctions of reality.