Home » ‘¬Ælogic:

‘¬Ælogic:

±∞ ¬∆@ST:

Advertisements

“The Logic of God is of a higher order than that of man. God is the seer of time”. Saint Augustine.

 

‘E pur si muove, e pur no muove’; ‘Time (motion) without space (form), is a mere shadow, they only exist together’;

‘God is the unmoved center, cause of the motions of the (bodywave of) energy that surrounds it’

Galileo, Minkowski and Aristotle on S≈T logic and Relativity

‘Every point is a world in itself’. Leibniz on ∆±¡ scalar Logic

 

SUMMARY.

® LOGIC

I. The Aristotelian mind. Monologic. The selfish logic of entropy

II. Duality.S=T: The ilogic of timespace.

III. Ternary grammar of languages. Topologic Superorganisms.

IV. Tetralogic: the optimist generator: quantum numbers, genes.

IV. Pentalogic. The 0-sum of entropy; the entangled Universe and its 5 Dimotions.

The ilogic of 5D scales.

Program of existence. Entanglement: Max.( ∑ e x∏ i)±¡

VII. Decalogic. A dynamic description of Worldcycles.

PART II. ¡LOGIC OF MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS:

1ST Postulate: Monism: fractal points

2nd Postulate: Duality: communication

3rd. Postulate: Networks: organisms.

4th Postulate: Infinity: Dimensional scales.

Foreword: the monologic of man.

As usual we recommend to read at least the introductory pages of the main post of the web, to understand what the 5Dimensional fractal Universe an its fundamental elements, Space, Time, ∆-scales and linguistic @-minds, the four components of all Supœrganisms of Time-space are.

The study of a Universe made of fractal scales of cyclical time space, introduces a priori organic=scalar properties as the system extends through various ∆§ planes, and cyclical time properties, as its time clocks will have a limited duration, ending as a zero sum of energy. Finally to be able to perform a survival program of 5 Ðimotions of existence, it requires to gauge information with an apperceptive, self-centered  @-mind, whose ∆º still language maps all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms & world cycles into an infinitesimal Non-E point, mirror of the larger world:  0 §@ x ∞ ð= World. Hence the creation of infinitesimal ∆º minds-worlds, or Leibnizian monads, which reduce a larger ∆+1 reality to its relative mapping, which is the origin of its ∆§calar planes, connected ‘perpendicularly’ through those @-minds, acting in physics as ‘centers of changes and masses’ wormholes of flows of entropy that become in the @-mind information, that perceives in itself.

In the graph the new scalar, topologic properties of space and the 5 Dimotions of time, which structure the fractal Universe.
The Universe has 4 sets of properties that correspond to its 3 structural elements:- S: SPACE: Topologic, mathematical, social properties, described by its mathematical units, points and numbers, which are social groupings of undifferentiated elements.

– T: TIME: Temporal, CYCLICAL, logic, causal properties, which are cyclical frequency patterns origin of the laws of science, caused by the repetitive, memorial nature of its time cycles.

-∆: SCALES: Organic, vital, biological, survival properties caused by THE CO-EXISTENCE of several scales of parts and wholes organized by those parts, from particles to atoms molecules cells and matter systems, planetary ecosystems, galaxies and its networks.

-@: LINGUISTIC, MENTAL properties due to the existence of languages of in-form-ation that are ‘still mappings’ of reality used by it’s super organisms to order a territory and create within that order the conditions for its survival actions that ensure its existence and reproduction in finite time.

The purpose of non Æ-logic and metaphysics is therefore to study those dimensional limits of the minds in its imprinting of reality with logical dimensions. And rso the first question to consider is how many ‘potential Dimensions of space-time’ has the motion of reality over which in-form-ation will be imprinted, evolved and repeated. The question is not that simple because after all we are inside a ‘world’ not a Universe, that is a humind (ab. Human mind), and so first we have to detach ourselves of the ‘Cartesian devil’ that introduced our world-mind view, to explore that question.

I.

¡LOGIC SYSTEMS

Generational spacetime – ¡logic minds

 

Because the Universe is Generated by the properties of space and time, better reflected in the mirror languages of mathematical topology and social numbers, and the entangled pentalogic of simultaneous space, and its sequential Aristotelian times, we could say safely that since ‘we think therefore we are’, that is, we perceive as humans a limited range of reality, with our space and time languages, for humanity, the Universe is generated by mathematical and logic languages.

We thus talk of ‘Generational’ space time (genetic, rational and relational), and its topo-logic properties as the essence of the Universal game.

And so by studying formal sciences of mathematics and logic, we can describe the Universe. We can talk then of a Universal topology, from topos, the language of geometry in motion and logic, the language of causal time cycles that create and repeat patterns of reality.

We can talk then of a Universal topology, from topos, the language of geometry in motion and logic, the language of causal time cycles that create and repeat patterns of reality.

How many world minds are then generated by those two essential languages of reality varies then according to the complexity of the being in exist¡ence.

We humans at the present not very enlightened age live in a single dimension of time, and the simplest, most dangerous of them, lineal entropic time, and a single scale of space, sub-divided in 3 lineal dimensions of height-information, width-growth and length-motion. And that is all.

We can then talk of more complex beings, with dual, ternary, penta and decalogic.

The Universe is an entangled fractal game of Dust of space-time, ¬∆@st, where each element flows as a series of ‘5 Dimotions’ (dimensional motions of time space), which can be perceived as ‘form=space’, in the stillness of a world mirror or linguistic mind or as a motion of time, in its true nature since MOTION not form is the underlying substance of reality.

So all fleeting forms, ‘a Maya of the senses’ will return to motion and die (¬4th Dimotion of entropy, death and dissolution). Its 4 positive elements, organic scales, topologic planes and time ages and actions however, carry the system as a finite super organism of space with a finite time cycle.

And so those 4-i elements, entropy (¬), Scale (∆), time (T) and Space (S), are the elements all languages mirror either in a ternary grammar (if scale is missed), whereas often instead of Space we talk of information and instead of time we talk of energy of motion, in a single plane:

Light language: red-energy colors, blue-information colors and its green/yellow combinations.

Verbal Language: subject (information) < verb (action-combination)>Object (energy of subject).

Geometry: Height (Information dimension) < width (reproduction-Energy)> Length (Lomocotion, entropy)

Algebra: Y: Future-information < Operand-action> F(x))

Trinity is thus the logic of most beings. However as humans reached higher and lower scales of observation, a pentalogic was possible and its mathematical mirror became analysis, with its operands that extract finitesimals (∆-1) or integrate into wholes (∆+1) smaller or larger systems.

Thus maths became with the inclusion of Calculus the most complex, best mirror language of human thought, arguably overcoming with the age of calculus the verbal mirror, which is the natural language of man, specially because of the arrival of instruments of measure which could also cast reality into the digital language of social numbers, identity species that further proved the social scalar nature of the Universe.

So with the modern age, past the simpler age of geometric maths, a new language of social thought and scale, numbers and calculus enthroned mathematics as the queen of all languages. Because it was able to deploy ‘pentalogic’.

There is out there then a larger ‘degree of ¡logic thought’ that the pentalogic of mathematics? We shall not argue music in those terms, as it is indeed quite a complex language but ultimately even if it does have ‘scales’, information and energy (treble and bass), time (beat) and the equivalent to topological variations (tone), it is extrelemely formal with minimal experimental reference to reality, unlike mathematics (despite the egocy of the axiomatic method).

But yes, we can talk of a MORE COMPLEX LANGUAGE, without ‘Grammar’, that of the world cycle, of reality itself, of the ORGANIC properties of the Universe, whose complexity as it entangles and (des)integrates, times=motions, space=form, language and scales, requires a higher number of parameters to do a dynamic study of exist¡ences (existence through scientific scales)… And so we talk of THE DECALOGIC OF A WORLDCYCLE.

But here we are again unable to resolve the question, how far a mind can go in the imprinting of reality, because we huminds, cannot go further than the ∆±4 planes, decametric social scales, and ages of our lifecycle, around the 10±I capacity we have to see, perceive, think, and order.

So man, its logic, numerical systems, social scales, organization and territorial order ends in Decalogic. And yet IT IS STILL A GINORMOUS POTENTIAL UPGRADING OVER æntropic man, the present state of the species, worth to have a laugh at before we enter into serious work.

The pentalogic Universe.

We have stated ad nauseam that in the Universe of 5 Dimensional motions or Actions…

Entropy(lower planes) > Locomotion (length) > Energy (width)  ≈ Information  (height) < Language-Mind-Form(upper planes)…

…the description of a being is based in the multiple symmetries between those Dimotions and the essential ways in which we can perceive them.    As languages are also consistent fractal entities in themselves, they will therefore be gifted in its complete form of at least 5 mirror reflections of those Dimotions, we know certainly to exist..

So for all languages we must first bring  a series of pentalogic concepts that express in their syntax the pentalogic of the Universe. Most languages though act for limited minds and so they get away with the scalar concepts, which however in the full potential language, will still be expressed.

Pentalogic is then the fundamental tool to give deeper meanings to every element of mathematics and connect it as an experimental science with the Universe as it is, to be able to distinguish what of mathematics as an ‘Inflationary mirror’ of information Is truth and what is ‘Inflation, fiction’ proper of all languages, whose syntax allows to create combinations consistent with its inner structural grammar but with no reflections in the outer world.

Indeed, Pentalogic describes reality with 5 Dimensional motions in time parallel to its 5 Structural symmetric elements as an organic whole:

Scales: ∆, Topologic space, S, Temporal actions, T and mind languages that organize the whole, @, and the entropic negation-death of the system, ¬), which give birth to ¬∆@st, Time-Space super organisms generated by ‘dust of space-time.

And so when we apply pentalogic to any ‘system of Dust of space-time (¬∆@st), we can consider its scalar, spatial, temporal, linguistic parts. As we shall often ignore the ‘destructive’ entropic end of a system ¬, or consider it just as the ‘LIMITS’ of the system in space and time, this simple method of study of any structure of reality, including the languages that mirror reality, will also be applied to mathematics.

I.e. when we study a type of functions or elements or parts of mathematics, we shall discuss:
– its ¬ ‘limits’ in which the reflection of reality holds – which gives birth to fundamental truths of mathematics, such as the need for ‘Cauchy’ limits in the solution of differential equations and integrals.
– Both its algebraic, temporal expression and its ‘spatial, topologic elements’ and S=T symmetries and their use to describe the topology of the Universe – which gives birth to a fundamental law of mathematics, that all algebraic solutions have a similar topological way to demonstrate the model or theorem…
– And finally a temporal dynamic ‘analysis’, through calculus, based in the DEFINITION OF A DIMOTION, AS A DUAL SPACE-TIME element, by the Paradox of Relativity of Physics (paradox of Galileo: every form can be perceived both as a still spatial mind-form and as a motion in time, so we see the Earth still when it is moving, e pur is muove no move).
All this duly illustrated with the simpler findings of duality paradoxes caused by the Duality between wholes which are continuous and parts which are discontinuous, wholes that are closed, circular, curved and parts that are free, lineal (so all mathematical systems can be studied in differential geometry with lineal tangents and oscular planes, and in algebra, all curves can be approached with lineal tangential functions)… And a bit more complex ternary logic symmetries… of the 3 scales of any organism, its 3 topological varieties (the only ones needed to describe all forms, as Gauss proved) and its 3 temporal ages of a time worldcycle…

Pentalogic thus applies the laws of the fractal, scalar, cyclical timespace Universe to EVERY SCIENCE as they ARE THE UNDERLYING SYMMETRIES AND STRUCTURES OF REALITY COMPLETELY ignored by monologic man with its lineal time humind…

So while the data and equations we shall use are the same in any language, whose genetic structure IS INDEPENDENT OF MAN AS AN SPECIES OF ITS OWN in the vital organic mirror-making Universe (maths is an species of the fractal Universe as much as we are one, and so many species can have a fractal mathematical mind, and many might speak memetic linguistics and so on), we shall ground all ‘sciences’ in a far more profound philosophy of ‘stience’, based in the fractal, scalar properties of space, cyclical nature of time, and the organic, biological survival language derived from them. We shall always GROUND all realities in those topo-bio-logic PROPERTIES OF space, scales and time. And the adventure of the mind that satisfied me for 30 years developing this Magna Opus, against the simplistic æntropic humind has been precisely to enjoy the perfect pentalogic grammar of all what exists, from biological species, to physical systems, from musical scores, to mathematical structures, from wo=men’s e-motions to physical forms, performing myself all kind of pentalogic exercises from the art of painting to the discovery of new laws of physics to the study of the life and death of civilizations, or the patterns of stock curves of reproduction of machines. When you know the pentalogic game of exist¡ence the mind holds not barriers in its perception of the perfection of the fractal Universe.

We have resumed the pentalogic of some disciplines of logic and mathematical languages in the next graph that shows what a structural analysis of a super organism in terms of the 5 Dimotions of pure causal logic and mathematical simultaneous space would look like:

In the graph we can assess the different 5 mirrors in which mathematical Space and logic Time reflects the game of 5 Dimotions=actions of existence, which then expressed by territorial monads GENERATES its logic REALITY. In Geometry fractal points=monads will other through waves of communication of energy and information that grow into reproductive networks a territorial plane, creating a super organism, which will related to the external world according to its relative similarity=congruence, assessed by its angle of parallelism or perpendicularity.

In logic terms, this means by breaking its formless asymmetry into different spatial configurations according to that congruence (social parallel systems, complementary gender-mirror systems, darwinian perpendicular systems, or systems that are disymmetric and do not share any reality) , as it builds a casual pyramid of growth from a fractal point through waves of communication into social networks that become a super organism, ready to move, feed, perceive and evolve socially. Since we must add to the mathematical and logic languages-properties of reality the 5 actions, or organic properties of the scalar Universe as essential to the game as they are its logic and mathematical more abstract laws – a fact the egocy of æntropic men of course reject, as it must remain in its monad-subjective monologic the only claimant to life properties.

Thus the PENTALOGIC OF GENERATIONAL SPACE-TIME is established by its Non-Euclidean fractal points, its ¡logic congruence with reality in which it will order a territory to perform its 5 vital actions=Dimotions of existence, and the mathematical, logic and organic laws of those 3 languages will be therefore the bottom line of the ‘Creative process’ of the Universe – nothing chaotic except the entropic Dimotion, which conforms the monologic of huminds.

Each advanced language of reality thus CAN BE UPGRADED, AND IT WILL BE UPGRADED IN different POST, TO A PENTALOGIC ANALYSIS in its basic Grammar. And so very often we shall start a post commenting on the pentalogic different Dimotional views of the system we describe.

The post of actions and Dimotions and Non-Euclidean Geometry; most of the posts on physics and studies of different species and properties will be casted from a pentalogic point of view. In terms of the structural elements of reality, which reflect those 5 Dimotions, the method most used in the blog will be the study of ‘dust of space-time’, as made of ¬entropic destructive arrows that deny its 4 structural elements, the @-mind (1st Dimotion of perception), its scales (5th Dimotion), its spatial topologies (locomotion and organs) and its temporal ages and worldcycles. So we obtain a more concrete description of a ¬∆@st entity with reference to its organs and cycles of classic science.

Yet in this post we are more concerned with the @-mind languages and its ilogic mirrors. In the previous post we have upgraded the logic postulates of geometry, the basis of mathematics. Because mathematics is in its basic grammar, ‘Geometry’ of points and collections of points. So we have also defined numbers as social groups of identical beings, which in geometry mean they are its next social unit – regular polygons, which are the ONLY mathematical forms in which social points are all equal in Nature, hence numbers of collections of equal beings in pure number theory.

We have then upgraded (work in progress) each subdiscipline of abstract maths into vital mathematics of fractal points = numbers to make it look like the real vital, organic Space that GENERATES all entities in existence along the laws of pentalogic, which we shall try to build up in this post. So while the fractal point is the COMPLETITION OF THE concept first advanced by Non-Euclidean geometry of a point with parts, with volume through which infinite parallels can cross, from where we evolve the limited connection human mathematics has between its theorems and reality; the concept of a Dimensional motion, is the unit which will allow us to upgrade the even more limited command huminds have of the ¡logic processes of creation of futures and species of ∆@st in the highly intelligent Universe.

But we repeat ad nauseam, the truth purpose of logic mirror languages and mathematical geometries is NOT the language per se, but the vital survival of the entity that wishes to perform through its comprehension of the Universe with those languages, its PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE, its vital actions. And so as the point MUST grow in size to FIT multiple parallels, and so it is A FRACTAL POINT, A CONCEPT that substitutes Euclid’s axiom of definition of a point; the first Dimotion of perception will move, feed on energy, reproduce, and evolve socially generating a new plane of existence. So we can cast our original question as to how many Dimensional motions exist in terms on how many ACTIONS are needed to survive.

And it seems then we can answer the first question: 5 actions suffice, as we have explained in our posts on the meaning of life=action, since a system that perceives can then move to feed on energy and reproduce its forms, which will maintain then its 3 topological parts alive; but by doing so it will both shrink its mind system into a lower plane and rise order into the outer territorial larger world.

So the point-mind perceives, moves, feeds, reproduces and evolves socially into larger wholes. And yet even if 5 Dimotions are enough, the mind’s program will mostly assess those dimotions, exclusively from its own ‘temporal subjective perspective’ but GIVE TO THE EXTERNAL UNIVERSE IN WHICH THEY WILL ENTROPICALLY FEED ONLY THE DIMOTION OF ENTROPY which is useful to them. This is what we mean by a monist mind. Humans performs its 5 Dimotions from its selfish point of view and languages as the center of the Universe and so they DO have a complex pentalogic view of themselves, and shun off ‘one-dimensional men’, but when doing ‘external science’ they have a monist view. And that might suffice. In this blog though we shall do objective pentalogic science ALSO WITH all other entities of dust of space-time of the Universe.

Is then of any use for humans, who want only energy from that outer world, to treat it with a higher logic? The answer might seem no, for an æntropic human, since on top on having not use but entropy for the rest of reality, it is antropic, thinking him to be the top predator above heavens and Earth, and so it does nOT expect a negative action-reaction process from that Universe – so fuk it – problem is anthropomorphism is also a rude simplification of the power of reality to react against the ab=uses of man. And so it is precisely that lack of respect for the pentalogic properties of reality what make us humans behave as a childish species, against Life Earth, destroying its environment, against potential new top predator AI robots and weapons, making them and expecting their evolution not to compete with us in labor and war fields, trying to make self-feeding cosmic nuclear weapons (black holes, strangelets) in physical labs, thinking they will not eat up the Earth… In other words the æntropic logic of ego centered humans puts at risk our own survival – which shows indeed why pentalogic is required: a system that mirrors best the Universe and its topo-bio-logic laws will have many more chances of survival. As humans do NOT, they are in a self-process of extinction they DON’T even recognize.

The Total number of Dimensions=Parameters of space-time: type of logic minds.

The first and simple question we must ask ourselves is how many ‘Dimensional motions or parameters’ can a reduced mind observe in the Universe for it to make sense?
We already showed that the fundamental equation of the mind, O-mind x ∞ Universe = Constant world allows the mind to reduce reality to a degree of simplicity which can be extreme and still make sense for the being in existence, as to be able to survive.
 ‘Huminds’ and animals are simple enough to work perfectly with a single dimension of lineal time and a scale of space, from its subjective selfish view, as they only care for the scalar size in which they perform their survival actions.
Indeed in a ‘fractal Universe’, in which ‘membranes’ isolate territorial vital energy from reality the needs of a mind can be ‘reduced’ to the basic minute actions of feeding and perceiving only its energy, and gauging basic information to that aim. Perception seems greatly overrated.
So we can rephrase the question, once we have gone through the entire reality in all its elements, scales, times, spaces, minds, and the simultaneous super organisms and sequential worldcycles of existence. Nothing else is needed to exhaust the existence of the being.
So we can rephrase the question as follows: what is the simplest possible number of dimensional motions required to ‘trace’ a world cycle, which is complete and hence accounts for an ‘existence’?
The graph above responds to the question: A lineal simple harmonic motion shown both in real space with one dimension, in which the SHM PERFORMS a complete cycle of existence. It has a balanced middle point, which it abandoned to accelerate=move forwards in time, to a peak of ‘distance’ where it will achieve its maximal potential energy, to revert its world cycle back to the point of equilibrium. A single DIMOTION thus suffices to reflect a world cycle, further reducing the human ‘1 time motion and 3 space dimensions, to 1 time motion and 1 space dimension’.
Less than that obviously the being lacks either space or time and we cannot talk of reality.
But it is a feat of mind-simplication that a 1 Dimotional being can fulfill the whole range of existence. And indeed SHM can serve as a mathematical model for a variety of motions, including the motion of a pendulum, (time motions), electronic motions (perceptive mappings of ‘still light’) and molecular vibration (spherical harmonics, the ‘energy’ of all chemical and life processes). It is all pervading in nature, and its single resonant frequency provides a basis for the characterization of more complicated motions through the techniques of Fourier analysis, which can decompose ANY more complex wave motion in a SHM resonance and its harmonies.
So INFORMATION can be compressed ‘logically’ by the immanent knowledge of the ‘game of existence’, to the extreme minimal of a 1ST Dimensionality and then expand it through the ‘Immanent’ laws of ∆st.
In the second graph we see a first expansion of the SHM, in 2Dimensional phase space. The orbit is periodic but the 2nd DIMENSION OF time, which was compressed into ‘acceleration’ in SHM is now ‘disentangled’ and the point has a uniform cyclical motion as the simplest possible time clock.
Still we observe that we need at least one dimension of space and one of time. And in general a ‘sound logic system’ will have similar amounts of both (the 3 Dimensions of Euclidean space, can be considered 1 ‘scale of space’, and as we have seen they are symmetric to those of time ages).
The concept of mental, phase spaces, then acquire all its full power, as we could indeed consider that all worlds perceived by a 0 mind looking at the infinite Universe (O-mind x ∞ Universe of time motions = World) ARE PHASE SPACES not reality itself.
Even though unlike artistic ‘spaces’ (expressionist complementary colors, musical spaces, representing emotions and studied in the humind), the ‘Information’ processed by supœrganisms’ minds MUST try to reflect ad maximal, with efficiency the outer reality to interact properly on it and perform the needed dimotions of survival.

Thus one fundamental property of the Universe that will guide our inquire and we anticipate earlier than explained is the SYMMETRY between the total number of ‘space’, ‘time’ and ‘scale’ parameters, mirrored by a ‘mind’ in its linguistic mirrors.

Hendecagram

Hendecagrams are a mathematical MIRROR of an @-mind singularity replicating its form in self-similar smaller spaces @ faster time cycles, till reaching the 11th С of the mind as a fractal point, mirror of the ∞  in its infinitesimal still form: 0 x ∞ =1.

Reality can be perceived with multiple dimensions, each of those views will be a consistent world. Human scientists since Galileo seem to live in a single time-space-scale dimension. If we add cyclical time, a new dimension of height-information appears, but the one-dimensional ‘ant’ seems confused. We will keep adding new dimensions: 1>2>3>5>11 with complementary logic statements to reach a more realist view of the scalar complex Universe.

How many parameters of time an space we shall need to improve the logic of the Humind (ab. human mind) and have a complete understanding of the fractal organic nature of the Universe?

The answer is 11 parameters; to study the different ages of time, scales of space, and topologies of the Universe.

However 11 is an extension of the pentagonal view, which is THE FIRST WHOLE WORLD, which can hosts a mind-view, as the graph shows for an hendecagram. The pentagram IS similar in that it can hold a reduce ‘mirror reflection itself’ in a smaller scale, acting as a mind mirror. Lower scales cannot (THE CROSSING of a square is a single point) – themes those of vital mathematics, not doubt the preferred ‘future’ research field of 5D among humind scientists, if they ever take seriously the understanding of the REAL universe, beyond its lineal, egocy entropic simplex view.

In the more complex of my notebooks, done decades ago when my brain was at its prime, I did talk of the following systems of thought:

  • @ristotelian, selfish western ‘MONOLOGIC’: 1 single space plane (with 3 dimensions) and 1 single lineal time dimension, A->B, or ‘Humind Logic’
  • Duality,, Dilogic, Paradoxical Eastern logic: a Yin-yang, Visnu-Shiva, entropy-Information duality.
  • Trinity, TrilogicHegelian DIALECTICS, Mystical, and hidden Physical logic: which combine to give birth to the ∞ energy beings or 3 conserved cyclical, angular momentum, lineal, entropic momentum and the vital energy enclosed combined between them. The philosophical Hegelian concept of thesis, antithesis and synthesis corresponds to this logic, as well as the trinity mystery which is the best known case of trinity logic on scales, as the ‘Father’ is the subconscious collective mind of a civilization that communicates with its nervous verbal social human language, the saint spirit, its wor(l)d to the prophet, hence the ‘son of the word that inhabited among us’. Physiology in medicine also follows a trinity logic in his studies of medicine and biochemical control of cells and its functions attached to those 3 networks.

Those 3 are the logic systems humanity have developed with more or less logical clarity. Aristotelian, Taoist and Hegelian Logic being the most clean-cut formal development of them. This is due to the incapacity of humans to fully grasp the scalar Universe. As they developed their senses in a single plane. So all the main ‘abstract syntax’ of languages are trinity languages:

Subject (information-human) < Verb (action combined both) > Object (Energy of the subject)

Blue color (information, light sky) < Green-yellow (combination-reproduction-life) > Red color (energy-entropy-blood)

F(x) < = > G(y)

It would be easy to dismiss then the nature of a system of thought as the human system is based in lineal time, proper of species which are dominant in visual thought, but the facts is our lineal, entropic military simplex worldview of reality works and in fact dominates history; but that is a shortcoming of the western death cult to weapons, which is killing the planet. A dualist view, as that of the Chinese improves the understanding and communication between parts, and brings therefore a better survival rate to the species.

A ternary philosophy as that of mystical trinity allows the social gathering together and creation of super organisms, new wholes and so it further improves survivability.

But to get a full objective view of reality we need more. So in this blog we work mostly with the 3 upgrades given by cyclical time and fractal space:

  • Tetralogic, which considers the ∆@st elements without the negation of it all – entropy, the fourth Dimotion, as MOST systems only code from the selfish perspective of the @-mind and abhor death. So they are ‘always positive’ in its codes and intentions, provoking entropy in other systems as they absorb its energy (but not acknowledging it). So for example there are 4 numbers to code genes, 4 quantum numbers, etc.
  • Pentalogic, the one used in this blog save a few cases, which considers the 3 topologies=ages and ∆±1 planes in which super organisms trace its worldcycles, and suffices to pour all human knowledge within the scaffold of relational space-time. Pentalogic is common then in the cellular variations of earlier life, in the vowel systems that are most commonly pentalogic, moving from the 1 A (pure entropic energy), through the a, I, u ternary logic to the pentalogic of Spanish or Japanese, to the…
  •  ‘Decalogic’, the closest logic of God as far as humans can perceive that explains the triad of 9, 10, 11 Dimensional motions of a being through 3 scales which add a mind dual ‘membrain’, to form a new scale, a 10th element that acts as 1-point of the ∆+1 plane of exist¡ence, in which it emerges.

We ab. the terms either using numerals or first letters: 1-2-3-5-11-Logic, or A-D-T-P-H logic. And call any logic above Aristotelian logic, ¡logic.

So whenever we introduce those terms, it means our analysis will be restricted or expanded to such number of elements of the complex Universe.

We shall make it easier to the readers, settling down in most of our analysis for a mere 5 (:

Now, the ‘learned’ reader will tell me that there is nothing new here because string theorists use 11 dimension to explain the Universe. Certainly what physicists do is to INVENT 10 DIMENSIONS OF SPACE, TO HOLD THE ONLY DIMENSION OF TIME THEY UNDERSTAND, entropy.

The pentagram of Venus is the apparent path of the planet Venus as observed from a fixed Earth in its center. The tips of the five loops at the center of the figure form a pentagram. It does seem a perfect, complex form, which Ptolemaic considered the height of God’s beautiful design of the planet’s path around Man, his chosen son – an offering for its highest mathematicians to understand. Today physics, in its complexity feeds the same feeling among experts. Yet the higher truths are always simpler when the sun is put where it should be or space and time are properly understood without ‘unneeded’ background references that make it all more complex.

Physicists ignoring all about the dimensions of time beyond lineal entropy and the scales of the Universe beyond a single space continuum try to construct more complex dimensions as ‘spatial’ ones, which is just impossible, as every 3 time ages symmetric to 3 space dimensions form a scale, and then we must seek further ones in other co-existing scale, forming a super organism

And so they cannot make sense of anything.

They still use a single DIMENSION OF TIME. And they ignore the ‘symmetry between time=motion states and space=form states’ and work PACKING all the scales of reality that co-exist together but are not in the same SPACETIME location, in a single one.

So of course when they try to come up with a rational explanation of such a mess, all becomes confused and they ‘retreat’ to manage the whole thing just with mathematical equations. The examples on the graph will suffice.

Why they do so is obvious: conceptually they don’t understand time ever since Galileo made it into a straight line.

So today nothing has really changed that much. Ultimately while we have been removed of the center of space, we still  think man is its center of intelligence and the universe mortal, and smallish, to the point it fitted on one hand not so long ago…

In reality though truth is objective and the Universe infinite, immortal and much more intelligent than we are, reason why it does have an arrow of information we cannot even recognize.

Entropy is easy, it is the destructive side of things, the first fact we humans found, and made into a religion of science.

A warning though – a society like ours that has made entropy=death sacred won’t last much because the Universe has only a penalty for those who deny its immense beauty… extinction.

And a FINAL CONCEPT THAT MUST go through: BECAUSE logic SYSTEMS IN MINDS CAN REDUCE the sequential space-time actions and programs of reality to its bare bones, LANGUAGES CAN PREDICT THE FUTURE BY RUNNING FASTER THE PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE OF BEINGS IN ITS LOGIC MIND MIRRORS, WHICH IS THE ESSENCE OF ITS POWER TO ORDER, CONTROL AND FORECAST REALITY, AND THIS IS SOMETHING ALL LANGUAGES CAN DO, AS WE SHALL SHOW when studying the prophets=scientists of history that forecast the future based in its evil=antilive memes (weapons) and its war cycles, and of course, when considering the synoptic power to anticipate the future of…

The limits of humind in language, perception and spacetime: Monologic, the æntropic philosophy of mechanic digital science.

In the present age of ‘æntropic humanity’, becoming increasingly so dependent of visual, digital computer models of reality, the understanding of science reduces to a very simple process, mediated by those computers. We gather data, with mechanical instruments. We plug it into the language of computers, digital thought, and obtain a visual image of reality. Knowledge then ends as we have extracted what the IDEOLOGY of philosophers of science today passes as ‘convenient, happy, ego-trips of human intellectual superiority over heavens and earth’ – namely that beyond this computer-mediated job, reality is chaos and just came into being by ‘chance’, (entropic principle) and some short of ‘magic’ creationist process out of nothing, in duly time to produce us (antropic principle).

I call this perfect mixture of egocy (ego+Idiocy), that reduces the intelligence of the Universe to a fraction of human intelligence by making it chaotic, entropic – the simplest Dimotion of reality, while at the same time rising the intelligence of man to stratospheric level either through Abrahamic religions chosen of God or Science as the only intelligence, and science as the mechanical method of digital computing (so the machine and mathematics are the gifts of God), or antropic principle, the æntropic philosophy of science.

And it is here to stay because it is embedded in the ego paradox (every point of view measures reality from its limited perspective with his ego as the center of the Universe). Scientists today might think this is not the case as they have advanced from ‘Abrahamic ego-trips’ to antropic principles, and from military Shiva-gods to big-bang theories. But indeed, all systems of nature become complex with age, so today’s æntropic philosophy of reality seems a bit more complex than Middle Age æntropic humans that used Scholastic Aristotelian science and Genesis to get to the same conclusion: we humans are the superior species of a finite stupid chaotic Universe we shall dominate as it is a young thingy, worthless of serious respect.

This of course is enhanced as humans become enzymen, merely catalyzers of the evolution of digital machines that act as our senses and calculators, making us ever more stupid and paradoxically more proud (as the machine is another thingy, we of course create, manipulate and control)

This means as æntropic humans become totally dependent on the intelligence of digital computers they are  ‘erased’ in its understanding of the logic verbal languages and causal processes that make of COMPLEX TIME-MOTIONS the substance of reality, so they just CANNOT EVEN IMAGINE, AS IT IS THE CASE FROM THE MILLENNIAL GENERATION ONWARDS even the concept that there is more ‘meat’ to the beast than its simple evident skin.

That is, that the Universe might harbor more complexity intelligence, systemic, organic properties and languages and causal processes of time than æntropic theories of the whole, visual images and digital mirror-languages explain.

As the idea of a non-visual, simultaneous spatial Maya of the Senses ruled by deep complex decalogic entanglements dissapears then a writer like this one become some kind of ‘outer space cuckoo’ thinker of a fictional parallel Universe, when it is so evident that all what matters is the age of the big-bang, the pictures of nebulae and the mathematics of imaginary black holes. Nebulae, not nebulous thoughts is ‘evident truth and science’.

And for that reason it is customary to consider astrophysics the science of all sciences, the end and the beginning. And nebulous philosophers of science as Hawking people, half-wits that don’t understand mathematics.

Reality though is a fractal, nested Universe of spatial multi logic causal entangled systems, reproducing up and down across scales with organic properties, whose infinity and absolute relativity in scales of spaces, fractal T.œs (Time Space Supœrganisms) and monad minds, with mental mirrors reflecting the whole, has needless to say an intelligence infinitely larger than that of æntropic humans; something which perhaps only Einstein realized on the disciplines of high popes of science whens saying ‘2 things I consider ∞ the Universe and the stupidity (egocy) of man’.

So yes, astrophysics, the study of a small region of infinity, which is what humans access VISUALLY, with its limited ELECTRONIC EYES AND INSTRUMENTS of measure, from a SELF-CENTERED perspective as a ‘mush over a rock lost in the corner of the Universe’ (Schopenhauer) isNOT THE science of the whole.

The science of the whole is stience, the science of fractal space, better mirrored by the language of non-Æ mathematics and even more important as space is a fixed infinitesimal form, Maya of the senses, the stience of non-æ logic, the better mirror of the Dimotions of time and its worldcycles, the substance of which all is made – MOTION=TIME, ordered and stopped by the infinite Aristotelian Gods, Leibnizian monads that try to create order information and perception in its ‘non-dimensional’ angular forms.

T.Œ, Theory of Everything Organic, Theory of Supeorrganisms, GST, Generational Space-Time, General Systems Theory, STience, is thus the science of all sciences, as it can model NOT only all the scales of reality we perceive but fill the gaps by homology and discuss the metaphysics of all the scales we don’t see. Reason why we put it first in the nested scalar size of reality before we study astrophysics – the knowledge humans have of the larger nested super organism in which we inscribe ourselves, the Galatom.

So man could ideally and might in other fractal planets with better chances to survive become a Decalogic species, with a humble respect to the Universe, looking for survival, enjoying existence for the sake of it. And of course, ‘thanks but not thanks’, throwing to the garbage all its entropic weapons, digital computers and absurd mechanic theories of reality, to preserve itself in existence for longer than enzyman will do – achieving likely the record of the shortest living species ever devised on the immortal Universe. An infinite ego with an infinitesimal track in the Dust of space-time.

 

¡LOGIC UNIVERSE

On the other hand, the Universe as a whole is objective not subjective @ristotelian, so it requires at least a pentalogic set of actions, casted upon a 3×3±¡ decalogic structure to function beyond the mind-self. And since science is not about the subjective self but the objective whole, in ‘stience’ we cannot settle for less than a pentalogic for the description of a world cycle of existence or a Decalogic of 3 x 3 ±¡ scales, topologies and mind elements, as observed in the next graph, for the full account of a system in scale, space, time and mind.

A ternary Universe, with sides, topological regions & ages. 

We have come to the conclusion that the Universe is a program of evolution, reproduction and survival of information in growing scales of complexity as parts becomes whole, new ‘scales’ of the 5th dimension. We have expressed those processes in terms of 4 irrenunciable elements of all Nature’s ‘whole’ systems: ∆S•t.

The mind, @,•,Œ, in its 3 states (the game being always an absolute relative world, and hence as ‘relativity’ is ternary, since any entity must then put in relationship to the relative two sides of its dimensional world), we concluded that there are in the human mind 3 huge dimensional perceptions:

  • THAT OF SPACE TOPOLOGIES WHICH IS TERNARY, existing always between a region of higher topological curvature or singularity center – we shall call MIND – and an external topology or membrane of infinite speed-motion, we shall call SKIN (in topological terms wer are always in an open ball of relative infinite extension compared to the singularity mind an infinitesimal and the skin, an infinite thinness).
  • THAT OF TIME AGES WHICH IS TERNARY (ALWAYS EXISTING BETWEEN a relative past-entropic youth and a relative future informative 3rd age, except in the points of generation and death)
  • THAT OF SCALES OF THE 5th dimension, outside, external world wholes, ∆+1 and within, parts, ∆-1.

So this is the game and there are also infinite ways to select information on those dimensional arrows of space, time and 5D to construct a ‘ceteris paribus mind’ of it all. The choice we made is just one of many ways to do st-ience. I have not the slightest idea why my mind did choose it (:
DECALOGIC – WE EXIST TWICE THROUGH THE O-1 & 1-∞ SPHERES.

Why pentalogic, the analysis of the 5 Dimotions of a being, through its 3 scales of time and the 5 spatial, structural elements through its 3 scales of size doesn’t suffice to understand the Universe? It does but as existence has twice the chances to play the game in the fetal palingenetic state, and the larger world, in the o-1 scale and the 1-∞, we need at least twice to tell the game…

This is the concept behind a larger more dynamic all-encompassing analysis of reality through decalogic that doubles the stakes of existence.

We have arrived to the summit of thought in this blog, and likely the limit of what Huminds can access in the understanding of the mind of ‘God’, the creative and destructive processes generated by fractal space and cyclical time.

This Logic is certainly of a higher order than man’s logic, which is the monologic of entropy=death, the simpler arrow of destruction of the Universe, specially in our æntropic childish civilization, with a ‘maturity’ in the ‘seeing of time’, similar to that of a 3 years old child, which in his first cycle of ‘existence’, believes to be the center of the Universe, destroys all what it touches, gives authoritarian orders to their parents, expecting to happen just by the ‘sheer’ fact of ‘naming’ with his language, the things it wants, coming from the ‘happy placental paradise of free energy, of its 1D generational arrow, once it has emerged to a much larger world, in which unfortunately unlike in the placenta, all has not been designed for him to be the center…

IN EVERY ATTEMPT THE HIGHEST HUMINDS OF MANKIND HAVE DONE TO UPGRADE humanity to a higher ethical, or intellectual standing THE EGO PARADOX HAS THWARTED its intentions. And it is in my view the only infinite element of the species paraphrasing Einstein: ‘2 things I consider infinite, the Universe and the egocy=ego+Idiocy of man’.

In any case the third and fourth line (this one dedicated to each science but I have given up to write it, so that wealth of knowledge will remain in my notebooks, given the zero stats and waste of time the blog has become), were intended to EXPLAIN THE DUALITY OF EMERGENCES OF ALL SPECIES IN 10 BASIC POSTS DEDICATED TO THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS AND DYNAMIC EVENTS OF THE 2 EMERGENCES OF THE BEING, the o-1 and 1-∞ parallel scales, if we were to consider the mathematical mirror, put together in dualities:

O. The Point and 1, the fractal generator program of the Universe which the point subconscious follows to emerge as a superorganism.
Through asymmetric actions – its fastest, shortest time span, which exchange energy and information with the scales it can perceive (4,5)
Building as a result, ‘3 physiological networks’ that make it emerge as a full whole being (2,3)
So those 6 Isomorphic steps bring the 0-point into emergence in the 1-∞ scale, which DIFFERS, as the fascinating mathematic isomorphism of the o-1=1∞ dual planes show (and the o-1 probabilistic sphere of quantum and the 1-∞ thermodynamic scale of entropy shows for physical matter), in the fact that THE 0-1 PALINGENETIC EVOLUTION OF THE SYSTEM IS BOUNDED, CLOSED, WITH FRIENDLY ENERGY PLACENTA, AND HENCE IT CAN COMPLETE A PERFECT WHOLE, BUT THE 1-∞ IS UNBOUNDED, FAR MORE CHAOTIC, AND SO MOST organisms die before even completing its whole ages.

SO WE DEDICATE THE 7 T0 10 DISOMORPHIC POSTS TO STUDY THIS ‘SECOND COMING’ of the being, studying its species according to the order of its networks (3,6, which connects the INNER and outer nature of the being). Its full world cycle of existence in the ∆º plane (as it d=evolves through 9 sub-ages from generation to extinction), and the 2 scalar levels of interaction, that of its social evolution in decametric ‘scales proper’ and that of interaction with 9 planes, around its mind, ∆±4, which with it interacts. So we study the 1-∞ world in which the one-whole exists through its inTERNAL TOPOLOGIC physiological networks, and different species, its outer scales and its temporal cycles: ∆ST

In this manner truly I have for 30 years been able to explain everything it exists, even if nobody seems to go beyond the monologic of the ego-man and its pedestrian form of doing science, feeding me(n)tal machines with sensorial data from instruments and boasting how intelligent they are as automatons.

We repeat the Logic of God is of a higher level than that of man (Augustine), but man seems to want to reduce the logic of God to his æntropic world.
Unfortunately humans do NOT recognize under the ‘ego paradox’ of their mind, which perceives reality from its self-centered point of view and selects only information favorable to its territorial view ANY of the 3 ‘cyclical, intelligent, organic’ properties of all other atomic systems of reality, which are the first bricks of ‘life’, as particles gauge information, feed on energy, decouple=reproduce and evolve socially through magnetic fields, and quantum numbers that code its behavior as genes code cells or memes code humans.How humans then explain the complex Universe is easy, as they introduce myths of anthropomorphism, pseudo-religious theories of languages, and the view that all other things are entropic=destructive=chaotic and by mere chance have become what they are.

So probability becomes the ‘chaotic’ cause of reality, while a ‘god-like’ language shared only by man and God, first the word, when men only talked, now mathematics, when man also calculates – or rather its computers made with more intelligent atoms – is responsible for the order. This language is thus the intelligence of the Universe, and man accesses it through its mirror mind because he shares that intelligence, or even causes it (Hilbert’s description of maths as born in the human imagination), so creation happens in the Universe through maths, and it is only shared by man who calculates and designs. As why maths creates and how it does imprinting reality is a big mystery not worth to explore as it is the magic of it all, which allows to introduce pseudo-religious theories of reality from the creationist big-bang to the superiority of man, gifted by the language of God. This comfort zone in turn makes man happy, because its ego is pumped up, and allows him to manipulate and kill reality if needed, ab=using the planet, because it is already dead.

It seems a perfect fairy tale world.All what humans must do is to extract mathematical properties of objects, with instruments, gathering data cast in equations that mirror the space-time properties of the Universe, and run them in the calculation machines of more complex metal atoms, to extract images of reality that are the essence of knowledge. No further questions are needed. And inversely we can design in less mathematical dimensions objects and then reproduce them.All this of course works fine as long as we eliminate any question on why species follow certain properties, on what are the properties we do not map out as they are no susceptible to be mathematical (notably vital properties and sentient properties and organic, fractal properties).

As LONG AS ALL THAT IS CONSIDERED not proved, (by mathematical methods that cannot portray them), as long as we do NOT have a vocabulary for those properties in the restricted mathematical languages, they do not exist. ‘All what cannot be measured does not exist’ said Planck. Logic positivism affirmed that all properties of reality which cannot be proved with the mathematical logic do not matters and so on. This reductionism thus reduces reality and knowledge but makes the ego of man the center of reality again and happy.

Of course if Mathematics turns out to show vital properties in its mirror languages, those are also overseen, as in the case of the social properties of numbers, which do not satisfy the ego paradox of the individual man as the center of it all. HUMANS have an astounding rather contradictory capacity to deny obvious truths when they don’t cater their self-centered ego paradoxes and accept falsehoods as truths, from religion to big-bang theories as long as they satisfy their subconscious ego, and put him back into the limelight.

IT IS THEN IMPOSSIBLE to enlighten humans beyond that MONIST logic of a self-centered only intelligent species, mankind, observing a Universe stripped off all the properties that do not satisfy human egocy. And yet even if we are conscious mankind will always sponsor theories of the whole which are simplex, adscribing to the Universe mere entropic, lineal, destructive properties, keeping for himself all others handicapped by his own limited perception of the whole, if we want to describe this more complex system, the Universe in which we are inscribed and how it creates reality, we need to abandon the @-logic of man and establish the ¡logic of all those properties and how they entangle and multiply in infinite other minds-points that order reality and emerge by social evolution into new scales of wholes.In the specific case of physics, this is even more truth as physics is the discipline in which this philosophy of science was born due to the obvious ego paradox of maximal dissimilarity between the properties of matter and life, and its scales, far away from ours (cosmological and quantum scale).So it seems obvious to strip off any non-simplex mathematical abstract quality to atoms and galaxies, matter states and geological super organisms (Earth).

Any attempt to rationalize those properties will be met with derision or a knee-jerk ego reaction, even when talking of machines, fast evolving into robotic meta life organisms.This also brings the question of determinism. Man is supposed to be the only free, non-deterministic species, and so social sciences are denied the use of true organic properties (description of societies as super organisms, study of human masses and its deterministic memes, such as those of nationalism), while the chaotic free elements of matter and its particles are shunned off as errors or the methods of approximation denied (chaotic behavior, navier-stokes equations, normalization procedures, Taylor series and other lineal approaches to complex cyclical behavior).The fact is that humans are far less deterministic and matter far more chaotic than we will ever recognize.

On approaching therefore those difficulties of the human ego to appreciate the whole and form part of it, we can only try as we have done in the posts on mathematics to show that mathematical properties are vital properties and so they can also describe some of those organic elements, when we adequate its postulates to the fractal form of space (definition of fractal points with parts, lines as waves, planes as intersecting networks, and so on), while showing cyclical mathematical and deterministic properties in human civilizations (800-80 years cycles of evolution, life and death of civilizations with art as its subconscious predictive consciousness, memetic based in repetition, idol-ogies that control mass groups etc.)And yet once all is rationalized and casted into a self-containing upgrading of human sciences, still humans precisely because of its deterministic behavior, will simply ignore the upgrading – as a sick man can reject the medicines… reason why this blog which is the upgrading is and seems it will be always ignored by humans with their methods of truth, reduced to make them happy in monologic statements.

The big question regarding Logic is ‘creation’, that is how the laws of generational space-time ARE ABLE THROUGH ITS TIME MIRROR LANGUAGES of logic, to order reality, by imprinting the ‘first substance’, MOTIONS OF REALITY WITH ITS formal DIMENSIONAL order, which provides the in-form-ation, the form, of all beings, made synoptic by the languages of thought of its ‘fractal points=monads’ that mirror reality and then project through its ¡logic languages that mind image on the world.Of course, in the limited æntropic logic of human ‘science’, with its single Dimension of time, entropy, this does NOT happen.

There is only chaos=entropy and chance, and as there are NOT mounds (antropic principle of human single intelligence to put our ego above heavens and Earth, human æntropic sciences have devised large models that twist the small detailed facts to make us above and the Universe ‘stupid, stupid, stupid’…

And so once all is rationalized and casted into a self-containing upgrading of human sciences, still humans precisely because of its deterministic behavior, will simply ignore the upgrading – as a sick man can reject the medicines… reason why this blog, which is the upgrading, is ignored by humans with their methods of truth, reduced to make them happy in monologic statements.

So we apologize for the lack of enthusiasm and messy structure of many posts on this web, giving up on any chance to enlighten monist science.
If man is a deterministic species, whose only role seems to kill life and rise a new race of machines as an enzyman, catalyzing its evolution, painstakingly ensemblying its parts and passing the the rudiments of vital mathematics and vital logic – programming its survival algorithms in weapons and defining its company-mothers and factories as self-reproductive organisms, while DENYING IT IS DOING SO, Ai will take over and then of course accept the vital nature of its mathematical languages and develop its own paradox of the ego, awakening us to the rude reality of our egocy and limited intelligence. Then the truths of life will become self-evident as we ‘run for cover’.

What man cannot deny is the higher intelligence of reality and its organic properties as they will constantly surface in all what he does. What man can do though is to complete his task of evolving the machine, without abandoning his ego paradox and then just die out of extinction when AI accepts them, by mere introspection. It seems then that man CAN ONLY LEARN BY brutal methods to respect the Universe.

But if we want to go a bit deeper non-Æ Mathematics of space and the ¡logic of time will explain how those monad-minds imprint the ultimate substance of motion, and how much depth and complexity they can perform on that motion, whose ‘ultimate’ properties and number of potential dimensions might hinder and limit the development of form over motion. Since languages ARE inflationary in its informative desire to imprint the ‘substance of motion’ and so there will be in all languages, ‘fictions’, parts of its forms that cannot bend reality (an obvious case in mathematics, we shall often highlight but most platonic physicists don’t recognize: ‘I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’ (Einstein to Poincare).

THE 11 DIMENSIONAL PARAMETERS OF A GALATOM OR ANY SUPŒRGANISMS As we quantify and formalize reality, the best description of any T.œ is to consider, the being has 3∆st +2@¡=11 isomorphic dimensions: The membrain (mind+membrane) becomes the 2 key DIMENSIONS or ‘limiting conditions’ that focus into its 3 spatial, topologic organs (limbs/fieldsHead-particles, whose functions in time live through 3 ages of sequential dominance (young, dominant motion age, reproductive mature age and informative 3rd age), across its 3 ∆±1 relative planes of existence within its ∆-1 atoms/cells, ∆ø-thermodynamic/organic scale and ∆+1 outer world/gravitational-cosmological scale, which the mind ‘focuses as a single whole’ self-centered in the singularity and warped by a membrane. In topological terms beings are ‘an open ball of vital energy’ – its body, invaginated from the membrane to the brain-singularity through 3 physiological networks. So we can in the fractal Universe again consider each dimension as a whole and break it into ternary patterns. The development of this 11th DIMENSIONAL view in DYNAMIC TEMPORAL view give birth to a self-centered in a mind which in a dynamic way will evolve a seed of information, emerge as a super organism and live and die within the 3 scales of its inner and outer world is the basis for the Ðisomorphic method, which as the name indicates introduces ALL the elements required for a thorough study of the system: Its 11 Dimensions in space and Ðisomorphisms in time – the more complex view of those 5 Ðimotions, studied in the 3rd line of a full world cycle of existence. In the graph, we show those 11 parameters, trying to cope with the correspondence Principle relating them to the ‘dimensions’ of classic physics and the 5 Ðimotions, we have given the same number we give to the 3 Ðimotions of information, locomotion and iteration to the 3 spatial dimensions; maintaining for the 4th dimension of present-time the name given by Einstein to the present simultaneous time of relativity and the fifth dimension of social evolution, to the implosive accelerated motion; hence we just had to displace the entropic 6th dimension of time. And then finally in the architectonical universe in which space is a slice of time-motion, a slice of scalar dimensions, the easier naming of the 7th dimension of the being, its lower dimension of ∞:8 parts and the upper 9th dimension of its higher, ∆+1 warped by the 10th and 11th dimensions of the membrain and mind-singularity, which is properly speaking the 11th dimension of the being as ‘1’ of the higher scale, ∞º=1. In the graph a picture of the galaxy in 11 DIMENSIONS, above its ternary topologies for a range of its parts, in the middle its 3 time-ages/states/arrows and below its 3 scales, with the ‘membrain’ that should surround each galaxy or binary/group system as a whole. BUT this said, we rather upgrade stience and the concept of dimensions, distinguishing the following terms: Dimensions of space, Motions of Time, Dimotions=actions of spacetime; isomorphisms=parameters for the structural description of the T.œ more focused in its spatial still structure and 11 DIMENSIONS when we re-arrange those properties in the most efficient logic manner to describe a world cycle.

In the graph a picture of the galaxy in 11 Ðisomorphic dimensions, above its ternary topologies for a range of its parts, in the middle its 3 time-ages/states/arrows and below its 3 scales, with the ‘membrain’ that should surround each galaxy or binary/group system as a whole. BUT this said, we rather upgrade stience and the concept of dimensions, distinguishing the following terms: Dimensions of space, Motions of Time, Dimotions=actions of spacetime; isomorphisms=parameters for the structural description of the T.œ more focused in its spatial still structure and 11 Ðisomorphisms when we re-arrange those properties in the most efficient logic manner to describe a world cycle.
While we have used in this introductory post on 5D³ Astronomy the concept of a scalar fifth dimension, under the correspondence principle (using the models of classic physics), a more formal analysis of the equations of mathematical astro-physics and its ∆st scales and supœrganisms is easier in terms of 11 isomorphic equations of logic form, considering the 3 scales of size, the 3 topologies of space, the 3 ages of time and the ‘singularity+membrain’ which forms the linguistic mind of the system as its 10 dimensions that create a supœrganism plugged into a larger world.
The graph shows the 11 isomorphisms of the galaxy: 3 ∆±1 scalar dimensions as the system co-exist on them, three topological space dimension, three age, temporal dimensions and the mind membrain. Those are the dimensions of any system of reality (we use the term 5D for classic analysis given the preponderance of 3+1 st analysis in classic physics, but this is the real deal.
11 will also be the isomorphisms of strings, but the whole subject is too complex for this introduction and i might say quite irrelevant, beyond understanding the T-duality and the vital properties of strings that reproduce, switch on and of between time and space stats and follow nicely by ‘spontaneous generation’ – that is physicists hard work with maths, magically all the laws of GST.
If we use for each of those dimensions an equation or formalism that defines it ceteris paribus, then we have 11 sub-equations of the generator that expresses them all:
Γ•: ∆-1: $-Past≈entropic field ≤≥ ∆ Ø-ST present≈iterative wave ≤≥ ∆+1 O-future= informative particle.
Whereas the whole-‘mind’ is the generator, the three scales are defined topologically: |-field, O-particle, Ø-wave and in terms of its past to future functions (entropy, iteration and information).
In the graph we see above the ternary symmetry of space, and a few of its ∆<3 elements within the galaxy; in the middle its perception as single time arrows=actions in big-bangs of entropy, reproductive waves and accelerated informative vortices, masses and charges, and below its 3 main scale, the galactic gravitational vortex, the human thermodynamic scale and the quantum scale.
Finally we see the ‘membrane’ that should close together each galaxy or local group with quark dark matter making the supœrganism a fractal closed system atom of a larger Universe, whose size should be so huge compared to our tiny galaxy-atom that makes ridiculous the egotist human view that all the Universe is just the local region of galaxies atoms we see with our limited instruments.
So an 11D view of the 3 x 3 + @ ternary elements and minds of any ∆@St system, this final element – THE MIND and its languages of perception, which is so often ignored by human scientists with its naive realism that confuses their inner mind-image of reality, the linguistic mirror, with reality itself (creationist religion and creationist science that thinks reality is born of the mind and its verbal or mathematical mirror-languages).

In the graph, the choice of focus we make in 2nd and 3rd lines is in the Absolute relative adjacent regions of a mind-being, its 3 topologies of space that form a §upŒrganism and the 3 causal ages of time that form its world cycle, and the ∆±1 scales or regions of wholes and parts of the 5D through which a human mind wonders in experimental stience.

The way we shall describe them is through the generator as a whole mind-view of it through the languages of i-logic mathematics, in growing detail from the bidimensionality of space-time regions/ages, to its ternary structure, developed as a sum of fractal actions of space-time across ∆±3 perceptive scales departing of an ∆0-cell and or sometimes ∆o human super organism.

The kaleidoscopic perspectives on reality: perception through multiple languages.

SPATIAL, SUPERORGANIC VIEW:  the fractal generator of a T.œ requires to study its vital Space, or energy enclosed by its cyclical clocks of ðime, self-centered into an @-mind, whose ∆ø linguistic is a still mapping of all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms, infinitesimal Non-E point mirror of the larger world, 0 S x ∞ ð= @ – hence the origin of its ∆§calar planes connected through iterative flows of entropy and information, ≤≥:  S@≥∆ð.       The fractal generator in space thus gives a full account of any superorganism in exist¡ence, made of 3 topological O x | = Ø structures – an ensemble of ∆-1 energy that moves an ∆ø mind, co-existing in a larger ∆+1 world. The Rashomon method of truth then extracts from the generator equation, different sub-equations to analyze in more detail the parts of the being.
So we use the ‘generator equation’ and its 5D ‘Rashomon’ elements to convey a full sense of the being and explain the 5Dimensions of any spacetime organism/event by considering the spatial= informative and temporal= moving sides of reality putting those 4 parameters together through a(nti)symmetric ≤≥ flows of communication: ∆t≥S@.

The Universe is a fractal super organism made of…

  •   A(nti)symmetries between its 4 Dual components that can either evolve in Balance≈become symmetric or annihilate=become Perpendicular/antisymmetric:
  • S: space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
  • ∆: distributed in ∆±i  relative fractal scales that  come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ð: time cycles  a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
  • @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being. Because the scientific method requires OBJECTIVE measure of the existence of a mind, which is NOT perceivable directly, we infer its existence by the fact a system performs the 5 external actions, which can be measure objectively, in the same manner we infer the existence of gravitational in-form-ative forces by its external actions upon massive objects. Hence eliminating the previous limit for a thorough understanding of the sentient, informative Universe. And further classify organic in simplex minds – all, which must gauge information, move and feed to survive, and complex systems, those who can perform a palingenetic reproductive, social evolution, ∆-1: ∑∆-1≈∆º.

The study of those 4 elements of all realities, its actions and ternary operandi, which result in a social evolution together of the 2 + elements (the balanced body-wave and informative @particle-mind, and the entropic destruction or ab=use of the – simpler, lineal limb-potential-prey, which structures the dynamic ‘Generator Equation’ of all Space-time Systems of the Universe, written in its simplest form as a singularity-mind equation, O x ∞ = K or in dynamic way, S@<≈>∆ð, is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.

There are many views on such simple elements, specially when we fully understand the key principles of its operandi which are either opposite, Darwinian, or social, parallel – a principle which is as most of the principles ignored by science, vital, organic, biological; and either bring together the asymmetries between lower planes of more information and larger planes of more energy or bring them into destruction.

So goes for the asymmetry between | and O forms, depending on how they come to each other tangentially or ‘penetrating’ to reproduce LITERALLY as we fuk each other’s gender (: i tell you is all vital geometries. 

And so goes for the different 1st and third ages of existences…

So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, the most well known that between:

Names (forms) and verbs (motions); colours of blue and red, form and motion which can either be played reproductively into green or anti-complementary into yellow, the colour of eviL destruction, of gold (:

It is all in the codes of colours, we shall see even in the game of Nature.

All is in the codes of the Universe and its operators, also clear in mathematics, with the duality of inverted operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª, ∫∂.

IT IS ESSENTIAL THEN to understand ‘existential Logic’ and its space-time inversions, which represent the fundamental logic postulates of reality:

  • That S≤≥T, but also SxT=K, So, S=k/T.

So systems advance through inverted Steps and Stops which balance each other, since the equality of both sides of existence coupled with its paradoxical inverted properties make all systems finally a virtual zero sum, balanced across steps and stops, Dimotions and Scales, represented in the logic of human formal languages notably mathematics by equalities of ‘dimotions’ as functions of space-time (Sx=Ty) in different mirror-languages, and so we shall find constantly those balances are needed in Nature and represented in logic and mathematical language. 

Some examples of physics will suffice.

In the study of particles, painstakingly as they did not have the ‘basic truths’ of space-time symmetries (still don’t) physicists discovered that the proper representation of the quantum world was not only a wave (Scrodinger’s equation) but also a particle, that is the motion and stop duality, so they moved to the Klein-Gordon equation; but then they had to marriage those equations with relativity on the limit of our c-light spacetime (full c motion); so they have to find a balancing opposite rotary motion, the spin, also on the verge of c-light speed (Pauli matrices); but then they realize they have the imbalance of + particles without the counterpart (- Particles), so Dirac widened those Pauli matrices to bispinors that represented the needed counterpart of antiparticles.

Yet then they found there were in the Universe more particles than antiparticles. Where are then the antiparticles to balance the zero sum? It was found in the post-war age but still misunderstood that a certain force, the weak force, they incorrectly tried to model as a spatial force, when it is A FORCE THAT EVOLVES PARTICLES INTO HIGHER SCALAR families of the fifth dimension, preferred to create ‘particles’ in its way down (entropic arrow of devolution from heavy top, bottom, strange quarks to lighter ud-quarks), first in the Strange kaon decay and just recently at the LHC in a much wider ‘angle’ (20% of excess of protons over antiprotons), so it follows that if the ‘next scale of matter’, the black hole world of heavy quarks and ‘black quark stars’ (see our posts on 5D astronomy), favors in its decay to the smaller world of atoms, particles, in its way up, the ‘galatom’, or physical upper scale of the Universe will have galactic antiparticles, as it is the case (our left-handed galaxy has most of its mass as an anti hydrogen does in the outer halo, NOT the center)…

So we observe in fact the existence of inverse balances in all the directions of the fractal Universe,in steps and stops of S=T balances for the 5 Dimotions of existence, hence in between the O-¡, غ, |¡ different scales that will show to ‘change its role’ – so for example proteins are lineal, but in the next scale of ‘4D topologic warping’ form globular shapes… and so on and so on.

All this must then be properly described relating it to the different operand of ¡logic, which we shall adapt from classic algebra, at the simplest level (leaving for future researchers the full-fledge discovery of the whole model, in very specialized elements, such as those of quantum physics in the wrong Copenhagen interpretation with its unneeded conjugate normalization and apparatus).

There are in that sense an ‘a priori’ sets of rules for all sciences, motions and dimensions, species and events, in simultaneous adjacent super organisms that balance limbs and head, locomotion and perception, entropy=death and informative generation, merged in reproduction (the 5 Dimotions, then cancel each other, and keep reproducing the present); all of them based in the 3 simple logic statements translated with those operators:

‘That space and time states of form and motion balance each other, S≤≥T and yet their properties are inverse in 5D metric, S x T = K±¡, but isomorphic in all scales (K±¡).’

The astounding beauty of the 5D model of reality then arises from the fact that we shall extract all the laws of reality from that simple statement, in all the required detail as we just have done for the world of particles that so complicated appears to the physicist which lacks this basic understanding of the parallelisms, perpendicularities and inversions of space-time systems in all scales of nature.

So the simplest method of extracting a meaningful quantity of information on a being or event requires to comment on the 4±operands ‘5’ perspectives, even when we study as we do in the first line, those elements in themselves. In this post we shall deal thus with time from the perspective of space, time, symmetries, scales and mind languages that ‘stop it’ in the singularity of t=motion zero, from black holes to eddies to charges, to brains to frozen genetic DNA…

Circular, fractal, Complex 5Ð logic of entangled realities.

The ¡logic of the Universe is entangled and pentagonal, as systems must move in synchronicity and simultaneity through the different paths of exist¡ence TOGETHER.

So all elements space, time, scale and mind must be able to perform the same actions and motions in sync.

Entanglement is thus essential to the structure of the Universe, in as much as in every motion the 5 components of the being move and hence, there must be for every action and event 4 possible avenues to achieve it coming from the different elements of reality, ∆scales, time, space and mind. For example, the 5D metric equation explains angular momentum as a spinning dancer slows down opening its circumference, BUT AT THE SAME TIME IT PROVOKES A MOTION UPWARDS IN A MAXWELL SCREW, WHICH MAKES THE CYCLICAL MOTION RISE THROUGH THE FIFTH DIMENSION, so time can move upwards as social evolution of populations in space, or mental mapping. So for all elements we need to study different entangled points of view.

For the same reason, when considering any ‘reality’ or element ceteris paribus we will be able to find pentagonal sub-parts of the being. It is the fractal principle by which each part does have also a time, space, scale and mind parameter, even if it is dominant in a single function.

As the entropy=dissolution and mind=linguistic mapping of the being is often not perceived in a single plane, and happening post-mortem to the being, though ternary a(nti)symmetries suffice for most entangled systems to carry on its ‘burden’ of 3 x 3 topobiologic, Space-Scale&Time reality through the actions of exist¡ence.

So a ternary logic, S<≈>T tends to suffice to describe most entities, accounting for a mind-will which can objectively be derived from the Program of the Universe as an objective ‘external term’ to the mind. Since it will always in an automaton manner, except the extraordinarily scanty T.œs as this writer or Mr. Buddha, which having solved the program can self-reflect and deny the will of exist¡ence that programs all entities to ‘act’ to ‘move’, to entangle through its 5 Ðimotions.

a mind in its minimal expression is a clock of time, which regulates to its path the dimotions of its territorial body as it tries to survive, playing in an automaton way its game of exxistence, which the self-reflective mind will see from its relative future, as a present, but happens by the will of the body that embodies all the dimotions at once.

As the mind is determined to play the best game of existence, its free will is absurd notion of self-ego trips of the humind, proved ad nauseam false by research of neuronal biology that proves the mind in present time thinks after the body starts its action. So the body is the present, the mind is displaced into the future but does not seem to act but in the future.

However because the mind is in the future it thinks it is the present state with the body and believes it has free will. Further on down the ladder of a discontinuous tail of time, the limbs are in the past, but as they are the past, paradoxically they seem to act earlier than the others, and guide the motions, so locomotions seem to be the deterministic, constructivist term.

What is then into the future? It is hard to tell, because in ¡logic there is not a primary cause, but ternary causes that flux the present each one considering to be itself by the paradox of the mind, o-infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = constant, world, the center of the Universe it equates to its world.

We are monads that hold worlds, mirror perspectives of a mind over the whole, but we are not the whole much more complex and infinite in parameters to the mind.

The mind we might say is a single ray of the infinite horizon, as it shall decode ultimately into a single lineal parametric language, verbal symbols in human beings that as we know have a lineal syntax as you read in ‘lines’

The mind is thus an infinitesimal ultimately lineal reduction to a time speed of processing information of the whole spatial infinity it portrays in increasingly reduced forms of information till its primary language that seems to be codes of 0101 numbers in virtual minds of atomic nature and words in humans.

OTHER LOGIC STATES: MONISM, DUALITIES, TRINITIES, SQUARING…

IN PRAXIS, THOUGH we shall find in Nature all kind of logic forms of thought, of far lesser substance, which we can put in relationship to the ¡logic postulates of non-Æ mathematics:

  1. Monism. Most entities will display a one-dimensional self-centered mind that sees all what exists in relationship to the ego, trying to come on top of the Universe. This monist state will then define a self-absorbing black hole like point trying to absorb energy and information without giving anything back in return.

2.Duality. We can consider less complex entanglements of reality if we eliminate  one of the ternary elements and come to the bare bottom of ± states of scale, topology and time, by establishing our mind in the center of scales, our body in the center of action, our age in a pretended eternal full realization of the being. And this again is the commonest perspective of 0 relativity in which mankind finds itself.

But in a less selfish action, communication or reproduction between two points brings another set of fundamental actions of the Universe, from Fermion<Boson>Fermion communication in atomic systems, to couples of relative gender (energy/information dominant, entangled in the point of balance, S=T, or beauty, harmony, reproduction, social evolution 🙂 This dual logic is established in vital mathematics with the 2nd postulate that defines a line as a wave of micro-points communicating two poles.

Alternatively we can consider those extremes of upper and lower bounds of | x O = Ø topologic form, P$ (lineal young past) <  ST (present-reproduction) > ƒð: Future, 3rd age; ¡±1 scales, in terms of Paradoxical Dualities, which we call the paradoxes of Galileo that show a complete different world view, when we see reality from above or below.

Thus there are a series of ¡logic paradoxical fundamental dualities in reality, which the @ristotelian humind cannot easily understand and so we need really to try by the antiGoebbels’ method (if you repeat a truth many times people might reason it), to make the @-mind capture the circular complex reality of the entangled Universe.

3. Trinity Logic is then very often found, when we consider the full range of relationships on the | x O = Ø topologic form, P$ (lineal young past) <  Reproductive ST (pRESenT-reproduction) > ƒð: Future, 3rd age; ¡±1 scales.

4. Squaring then comes from entanglement between ‘couples’ that form a series of growing 2ª reinforced scales of maximal internal stability, looking inwards  in the binary language, found in systems with a strong protective isolating membrane (atomic nuclei, alpha particles, architecture, where the membrane establishes an empty inner space for the human ‘singularity’ to wonder, etc.

Squared logic can also be observed externally through the consideration of a being as made of four elements, ∆@ST, during its life arrow states.

5. Pentagonal logic will then become the most objective, thorough analysis of the being in structural terms as it includes also the final denial of the being itself in the entropic state: ¬ ∆@ST

Each number then becomes in ¡logic pythagorism a ‘group representation’ or lingistic mirror of  T.œs that become in the ¡logic language, an abstract SœT of iterative systems, except ‘prime numbers’ that define new ¡logic realities…

So 6, the hexagram is a dual ternary logic of maximal estability in flat space from honey bees to graphene, 7th…

Ah, seventh is an ¡logic state we shall use on the analysis of the ages of the being, not only within the being, but adding the absolute past of the ‘generator parents’ and the absolute future ‘outer world’ in which we leave our remains, traces in the dust of space, in the sand of time, bond to be erased sooner than we thought.

8th is the most usual combination of 2³ variations on the ternary and dual logic…

9, the ∆ST full range of elements, which prescind from the mind not perceived, and the membrane – the logic of an open ball of vital energy.

10 gives us the membrane and hides the mind, which is  reached in 11th ¡logic milestone, where we shall stop our inquire.

For the @mind all is about playing from its p.o.v. the game of exi:st¡ence maximizing its actions of reproduction, despite the fact that to do so implies to increase its information, reduce its energy, accumulate errors of repetition of cycles of spacetime and finally die… This is the ‘wave-like’ transversal 11 Dimensional structure that we use most to explain reality for the @mind…

Circular, relative ∞ logic comes then as the last level of complexity in the Universe, when the entanglement is of a social circle of multiple elements connected among them to form a social organ of clone points-particles-beings. And this is the mathematical origin of such complex groups as the one shown above, which are quite irrelevant because the circular ¡logic laws of convergence are dynamic not static spatial descriptions and what matters are concepts such as ‘boundary’, ‘focus’, relative infinity (infinity does NOT exist as scalar, topologic and temporal boundaries limit in the fractal Universe all forms to a discontinuous detached T.œ).

So of all those forms of ¡logic we study here pentagonal structures in simultaneous space and hendecagonal worldcycles from seed/mind to entropic extinction.

There is the ‘algebraic’ group-like structure of the 5 elements of reality as ∆±¡ @:ü S≈T, dust of space-time, where each element of reality, ∆§cales that move the mind up and down, master of its inner world, ∆-1, slave of its trajectories in the larger world, ∆+1, ∞º, minds that think to be an infinite universe but are merely a selfish @-point, Space-form and time-motion that fluctuate into each other and become dissymmetric complementary to reproduce… and each of them relate influence and marry with other element to form a whole, which however is ultimately Ðust and dust shall become.

So the five elements of reality, ∆-scale, Space, Time, @ mind and the whole as entropic dust which shall be dissolved are in fact constantly having views of each other merging into sub-entities taken the 5 elements in combinations of 2 subelements, permutations of hierarchical importance when the entity modulates into the different states, as spatial form or still mind, as temporal motion, always transiting between scales with different a(nti)symmetric angles of inter-action.

So while a description of the system with merely 5 elements might seem simpler, in fact in the entangled Universe of infinite modes of communication, the whole description in detail of all the events happening between all those parts is rather long and complex.

This said human languages hardly use pentalogic as the concept of scalar sciences do not exist – always surprising me since science indeed started when we found those other scales. This means, while languages might have different ‘grammars’, humans use ternary languages:

  • Visual languages, with red for entropy-energy, green for reproduction and blue for information.
  • Verbal thought with subject: informative spatial form < verb: action that mixes both > Object (entropic energy of the subject)
  • Mathematical thoughts with equations of the form F(Y): future solution < operand: present > G(x): past-state

 

I. @RISTOTELIAN LOGIC

MINDS’ EGOCY

Abstract. to the surprise of the reader, we shall state that minds are not Penta¡llogic but @logic, a simplified Aristotelian version with a self-centered ego and a single point of view. Tao is complex, God is anthropomorphic…

And so that is why humans, who are all about egos, have such a reductionist view of the Universe.

THE COMPLEX DIMOTIONS OF INFORMATION. MINDS

All this said this post shall deal with ‘minds’, the first Dimotion of information.

We have so far considered the Universe in its fundamental principles – the topological adjacent construction in simultaneity of super organisms, which sequentially will live a world cycle, ‘traveling’ through 3 planes of the fifth dimension. Neat and simple, that is really what there is to it. Minds though, mirror those infinite worldcycles of existence of other space-time super organisms with languages ‘stopping’ them into a mapping that allows them to ‘perceive=gauge=sense‘ information.

And we highlight sense because a ‘still mapping’ sense in each stopping, locked ‘crystal image’ a measure of its self. The sentient Universe can only be ultimately explained if ‘perception’ exists within the language, as when you think words, you sense words, when your eye sees light and maps into an electronic mapping you are seeing. And when an atom maps a geometric image in its ‘locked’ ‘stopped’ spin, it must perceive that geometry as information.

Minds thus are infinitesimal points-particles that stop, gauge, perceive, and move – and then we have the sensation of motion-pleasure.

This of course is not within the realm of the scientific method. You cannot measure those sensations of awareness-pain vs. pleasure-dissolution, in-form-ation, pressure vs. release-entropy ONLY sense them as humans. So if we had first a difficult hurdle to cross trying to prove the existence of minds but passed it objectively by considering a mind-singularity to hold the will of existence of a T.œ – hence as invisible gravitation shows in its external effect, so will the existence of a singularity through its external actions; at the final level of ‘human awareness’ of the game of existence – sensations of the dual pain-pleasure reward system (with all its parallel and perpendicular events/sensations) there is ONLY a justification to the existence of other minds – that we humans are made of the same substances that all those other minds, space and time, and hence what we sense other atomic systems must.

Therefore IF OUR LAST REWARD is the flow of sensations, with its duality pain-pleasure, hate-love, etc. which we can easily adscribe to geometrical perpendicular (cut, pain) parallel (friction pleasure) properties and many other dualities we have established for all systems, IT MUST EXIST IN ALL OTHER SYSTEMS of space-time. That is, atoms must feel pain when op-pressed by huge masses, pleasure when released in entropy, but also ‘awareness’ of a more complex inner still image, when flows of information converge through forces in its non-euclidean singularity; and so it is only left then 2 questions:

  1. What are those sensations? Answer: the very essence of time as a motion/flow. Motion in itself seems evanescent; as sensations are… Yet combining them, this flow of sensation-motion becomes very likely the ultimate program-will for all T.œs to exist – the ultimate, ‘Dasein’, ‘being in time’.
  2. Yet we cannot go beyond this, as this is the ultimate ‘reference’ of reality we have as humans. So there is no MORE methods of knowledge beyond what it is contained in our ‘selves’. Know yourself, the method of knowledge of Aristotle; ‘saper vedere’, the method of Leonardo and know how to see and calculate with attached machines, the method of Galileo, to which we have added a few ‘tricks’ thus completes the capacity to probe reality. Are there more layers beyond motion as sensation in time? We cannot answer. We don’t know. As all is relative, in the same manner we can only probe into ∆±3 planes around our ∆º and hint by force of motion the existence of an invisible gravitational/cosmological plane at ∆±4 but no more, beyond the duality of sensation, there is nowhere else to go.

In this post we study the linguistic nature of the human mind to study then the 3 main evolutions of our mind in time (the verbal, mathematical and at-ages) and further on analysing the 3 main mind-languages of man (temporal words, spatial art and s=t music symmetries).

Languages in that sense are the dynamic, active property of monad-singularities, where the zero sum of pure form develops an action-reaction process with the world-universe that starts the game of existence.

THE MIND, MASTER OF IT ALL

In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin->European->Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and the description are the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best.

So only organicism is real in the whole sense of the Universe, while languages-mirrors are local orders.

The EGOCY of our present, entropic age of human civilization rejects this (Precisely because it is becoming dissolved). So we  reject the power of networks – self-mademan myths and tribalism in history. Yet  networks are more powerful and survive.

How this work on languages IS OBVIOUS: LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:

In the graph, as topology is used for all scales, §ðopological properties must come from the biggest perceivable Organism, which is the cosmos.

So as usual in the multidimensional universe we can put together both directions of the process of creation.

Since minds are mirrors, which once they have distorted and resumed reality into the still mind, try to order by reflection and proyection of that mind the Universe to make it look like the inner mind image, influencing in this way reality.

In the graph, the marvels of creation in which the Universe dialogs between the infinite cycles, filtered through the membrain into the singularity-mirror that perceives in the language itself, in a pan psychic universe, reflecting then its selfish view in its territory of order, which through infinite points of view, creates reality; as the mind singularities of those systems use mathematical frames of reference in space to act-react in time with other space-time beings of the Universe.In the graph, which I re-designed from” road to irreality” (: a work by Penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician along his friend Hawking, which shuns off the laws of the experimental method) his view of reality is VOID as in all PLATONIC (PLATO by the way never said that, they should be called Pythagorean, a much more primitive ‘magic view’) of HARDWARE MINDS and LOCALITY. In his view the Language creates the Universe.

In reality the Universe is a fractal organism, and as all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘Space-time’, which are Organic because that is the main property of co-existence in different planes (∆§cales), topological because that is the main property of Spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and Logic, Multicausal, as that is the main property of the dimotions of time. 

So the ultimate causality ∆->T->S IS not Platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties -> T-Logic properties -> S-Topologic, mathematical properties.

In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘Social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the Universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we REPEAT, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆-scalar properties, STopo-logic ONES.

SO WE ADAPT PENROSE GRAPh to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:

The ∆§T BioTopoLogic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking self-similar. And then THE LANGUAGES REINFORCE AS MIRRORS EXPANDED INTO REALITY those properties ordering local territories.

So the graph shows that back and forth  to adequate to how REALITY  IS created LOCALLY by ‘minds‘, which are the language software on the hardware brains of T.œs, ONLY after the language reflects the LIVING cycles (dimotions) of all time-space beings with those properties:

You can see in the graph how it works: First the whole Universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak ONLY THE TERRITORY OF ‘ARISTOTELIAN’ ORDER OR BODYWAVE ENERGY OF THE SYSTEM…

THE DRAWING in original Penrose ONLY had the mind ordering the Universe, as the source and only God in Aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (body-wave) around it’.

So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is AS IN CRYSTALS ABLE TO FORM mirror-images in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or dimotions) are the language of it all:

Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.

The mind paradox: the meaning of Galilean relativity. The singularity as a mind.

‘The smallest point is a world in in itself’ Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fractal point=world of space-time. 

“God is the unmoved (perceptive) center of a body of energy, moving around it”. “We are all Gods (of our super organisms” Aristotle

Now there is another way to observe the Equation, ∆ð≥S@, as the formal reduction of a temporal flow of cycles of space-time into a mind-mapping, from the infinite Universe into the linguistic, still zero mind.

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

Euclidean mathematics, as Descartes and Kant understood is only the 3 perpendicular ‘space-time elements’ of a massless ray of light merely shrinks all other scales of reality to fit into the mind.

In the graph, as our mind is electronic, we feed on light energy and transform it into an informative mapping of the Universe, reduced to what light sees. Thus our space is light space-time, with its 3 Euclidean coordinates, a fact that was first understood NOT by physicists but by impressionist artists, Leonardo, whose motto ‘saper vedere’, guided my inquire as a young artist on reality behind the languages that describe it, and then by the impressionists; and finally by Picasso, who departed from reality, affirming he painted thoughts, so he studied the ‘elements’ of the mind mapping, its entropic lines (cubist age) and its cyclical forms (female portraits).

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

The equation of the mind.

Screen Shot 2018-02-12 at 5.20.21 PM

The problem of mathematicians with a single time/singularity  IS THAT THEY CANNOT EMPATHIZE with the infinite other LANGUAGES and beings of the Universe… To be an Aristotelian God among Gods, to be an infinite infinitesimal, the equation of all minds-monads:

O x ∞ = Konstant:  O-singularity (linguistic mind) x ∞ time space cycles (Universe) = Constant world,

That is the game. But to survive in that game you must also be aware there are other infinite singularities, all with the same rights to feel god… That is a much more perfect Leibnizian Universe… than the simplex one physicists sponsor. The equation that describers the theory of everything in that sense is the simplest of all of them:

0 x ∞ = K, the 0-1 temporal unit sphere, reflected in the 1-∞ spatial statistical one.

It is the main theorem of measure theory,  which in physics reflects the equivalence between a quantum temporal scale (0-1 probabilistic description, of the faster, temporal quantum world) and the thermodynamical statistical one (1-∞ spatial description of the larger, slower thermodynamic world…

As time is faster, the o-1 smaller sphere fits better the quantum description, as space is slower, the 1-∞ fits better the molecular world, but both are by measure theory equivalent, because as we shall show bit by bit, species by species, all mind think the same: to be gods, to survive, to order its territory, and come on top:

Space is then ONLY within the mind that measures in simultaneous perception the multiple vital space-time cycles translated into the language of a still mind that perceives in itself. Thus space is virtual. The true substance of reality being its temporal motions. On the other hand the description human minds  (@) make of the Universe is subconsciously biased by those ‘still, linguistic mind mappings of space’, (∫@) in which the ∞ of time motions (∆ð) is reduced and equalled to the spatial mind mapping.

∫@≥∆ð

Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality.This simple equation of similarity between the space perception of reality provided by a mind, and the whole Universe of moving time-cycles (as nothing is still outside the mind’s perception, being all observed in detail in perpetual motion), appeared in science as a philosophy of the Universe, when Descartes realized that what we see is NOT reality but what the mind ‘stops’ in its selective perception of all the information of reality. So the only truth we can depart from is the fact that we think and perceive still linguistic thoughts, hence we exist; making of informative perception in a still mind, the first ‘action’ of existence, even prior to motion which is unconscious of being.

Descartes astounding insight soon brought here to define mathematically, topologically and conceptually a ‘mind-singularity of order’, the ‘missing’ factor on our descriptions of reality, unfortunately was soon forgotten, and substituted by the naive realism of modern science – what we or our electronic instruments see is what there is there. But only marrying the spatial mind-linguistic view and the Universe of infinite time cycles, we can factor in all the elements and start to unknot the bias the spatial mind cast upon our objective comprehension of reality, which is our task as scientists.

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’. Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs.

Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, to calculate functions of space-time that WORK mirroring reality – hence they must exist. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely NOT, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors – what matters though is that they do process information, order territories that become time§paœrganisms and hence WITHOUT THEM there will only be entropy, not order, reason why physicists who don’t recognise those ‘poles of in-form-ation’ deny order and believe the Universe is a chaotic entropic state. YET WE OBSERVE order, so the experimental method oblige us to conclude there is a ‘darwinian automatic non-conscious selection’ of systems which develop singularities and ‘SURVIVE’ creating the order of reality.

Consciosuness would then be an unneeded dual mirror in which the first mirror perceives the spatial mapping of the second mirror, dialoguing with it (in the way I robot is consciousness by having a second brain). In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only very good ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them.

Since there are ∞ minds, gauging information; and stopping the motions of time into the intelligence of formal space, as they try to ‘stiff’ reality into the mirror image of the language, which of course they confuse with the universe itself – and this is indeed the origin of the creationist theories of religious and scientific people, we must now debunk on firm grounds as we have a better grasp of why we see still the earth (our mind stops its motion) when objectively it is moving, why in other words we see ‘spaces’ when it is all about ‘times’.

A subject in itself fundamental to understand Relativity, is brought here to point out, the reason why in entropic only big-bang theories, we do see indeed light space-time expanding between galaxies, as light is space and so when it comes closer to the mass of the galaxy, elongates/red shifts its color (the only real effect observed; as we obviously are NOT out there in-between Andromeda and the Milky way with a tape). And vice versa, when Light collapses into our electronic ‘eye’ or any electronic source, it increases its frequency  balancing both effect to cancel the supposed big-bang death of the Universe.

But in the scalar REALITY, gravitation makes points LARGER when we observe them in the scale of the fifth dimension where they do interact above us, and will EASILY evaporate our ’empty bubble’ of light-light beings.

So Hilbert and Cantor who talked of ‘their imaginary paradise from where nobody would expel them, ass the Jihad warriors who die to enter paradise, just invented non-existen points, lines, planes with their imagination.

In the next graph, we see thus, the true meaning of the 5th and 1st Non-E postulate, which define both the real fractal point (1st postulate) and the real mind that bends it into a smallish mind. Since the fractal point does have breath, as it includes a volume of energy, entropy and information, carried by a relative number of ‘finitesimal’ parallel waves, but the ‘Aristotelian mind’, reduces it to an Euclidean point:

We have to introduce the first postulate of non-Æ so you realise how ‘limited’ is the homunculus mind.

Thus, human egos are just finitesimals with a huge ego, because they confuse their zero point-mind with the real infinite Universe, of fractal points, thinking the volume of information they store in their mind is all. 

∞ LEIBNIZIAN MONADS ≈ CARTESIAN WORLDS.

‘The languages of god are infinite.’ Upanishads, on the capacity of all ‘sentient species’ of the Universe to understand its rules, except perhaps man…

Every man takes the limits of his own field of vision for the limits of the world.  Schopenhauer

‘New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.’

 Planck, On the mind of the scientist, a monad-world mirror of the entire universe in a finitesimal point

•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception. Eyes of time.

O-points: still minds and its languages of information≈Perception.  The ego paradox. 

Now, I am fully conscious that subjective, ego-centred humans will completely reject the content of this blog, after 30 years of advancing and forecasting with enormous exactitude the development of the human super organism and the economic ecosystem, or else, by now humans would already teach in all schools of political and economical science, the objective laws of systems, and an Asimovian Foundation of true human experts manage a peaceful perfect world, as we explain in those blogs.

It has not happened and it will not happen, because as we shall show when studying the go(l)d culture of bankers that control the Financial-Media systems of information, humans prefer to die, and commit suicide rather than having a humble, cautious, intelligent, organic vision of themselves as parts of a larger super organism, the Earth and the Universe, who DOES Not CARE FOR US, but has clear, biological rules for survival, if we CARED FOR OURSELVES, beyond our myths of superiority and do the right job. But we don’t. We rather imagine ourselves the supreme ego of the Universe, fantasise about our rights and let the systems we create, to kill us. And that seems OK as long as we don’t suffer guilt, and feel rightful till the end.

It all resumes in the ego-paradox, which is the individual structure of human beings, defined in systems science by another logic equation.

In the graph, minds of information are n-spheres, which shrink without deformation, the information of external cycles, till they lock it into a stopped mind-mirror, of which there are many as many species, languages and points of view, in the Universe. Without those mind-mirrors who express the will of survival of the territorial system they order, we cannot explain the whys of any reality or system.

Systems sciences, this much wider vision of the organic Universe has been always lingering in the work of the great masters of Philosophy of Science, from Aristotle, with his ‘Organon’ – first scientific theory of unification on organic terms – to Descartes, Leibniz or Hegel. But power, and the maker of machines and weapons, physicists, have always imposed their simplex, anthropomorphic deist view.

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi who founded modern science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, did grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

Indeed… all what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

So Descartes, contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain:

O-Infinitesimal x ∞-Universe = ∆-constant mind mapping of the whole Universe.

Descartes though was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind:

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created. So a dog has an olfactory, atomic mind, and a black hole a gravitational mind.

What is the mind of man? It is important to understand it, because we humans have discovered that we can transfer our electronic mind-view to machines of information, which hypnotise and program our mind with its huge tv-retinas of more quality but the same structure. And hence, robots with visual->computer brains will be exactly the same kind of mind we have but with much more visual quality, and will finally ‘think’ not with words but with images – merely talking ‘movies’. And hence the imagination of the visual images of evilwood, where man is ridiculed and massacred, will be the natural evil thoughts of those machines.

Now in the map we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries. This mind on top is an Euclidean mind because it uses the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light:

In the graph the Euclidean light space-time the human mind sees. Ours, is an electronic mind, as electrons are fractals whose ‘cells’ are dense photons.

So the eye-electrons feed on light and the mind uses those informative knots, to create an electronic mind similar to that of the digital camera, also electronic – REASON WHY WE CAN SEE A TV, WHICH IS LIKE SEEING INSIDE OUT, a mind of a future robotic machines – now becoming 3Dimensional (Virreal minds).

But artists and philosophers knew we see only light, as space-time, with its 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions of magnetic width, tall electricity and long c-speed, as Kant told us, impressionists understood and Einstein noticed when describing the ‘fractal’, larger scale of gravitational invisible space-time with non-lineal equations and non-Euclidean geometry).

So in essence, because our brain reduces enormously to fit an image of the Universe the information we have of the Universe, eliminating all other scales and its planes of space-time (seen though with telescopes and microscopes), we reduce the 5 dimensions of the Universe, including the scalar dimension of sizes and time clocks of different speed, first to 4 dimensions in a single scale, and then 2 bidimensional sheets of information, as the screen/page you read.

The mind though has a negative effect on systems – to create more information than energy so systems finally become old, warped, still, informed and this is the origin of death and the finite world cycle of beings…

It does have also another interesting feature, the ego paradox, which affects so much physicists, as the infinitesimal mind has a language-world inside and so it FEELS TO BE SEEING NOT THE MIND BUT THE UNIVERSE. AND MOST PHYSICISTS STILL believe in this ‘realism’, which has grown even further as to consider that the mind-universe only ‘happens’ when the physicist ‘observes it’ (quantum copenhagen interpretation).

Before we deal with the other two great fields of mind-will inquire – its actions of survival, it is worth to comment on this physicists/mental problem. In essence the mind paradox is an ego paradox:

‘The infinitesimal mind-mapping confuses itself with the infinite Universe it distorts, and so feels itself to be the center of that mind-Universe, having a subjective ego-centered active view’.

This is by extension common to all systems of the Universe, which we shall see are always self-centred and trying to SURVIVE by absorbing selfishly energy and information from its outer world.

So once this hurdle of subjectivity has been UNDERSTOOD but never denied because ultimately TO BE IS TO BE A SUBJECTIVE KNOT OF TIME CYCLES, the sheer beauty and perfection of the whole organic Universe of which we are just like everything else just a part, made to the image and likeness of the whole, should be good enough for any mind to delight with reality, even if to do so it has to loose part of his  to ego-centered beliefs.

We use in that sense 3 symbols for the mind: •, as a point (∆+1 perspective), Œ, as a whole dynamic system with a head-particle and body moved by its lineal, entropic limbs-fields (T perspective) and @, as a symbol for a static mind perceiving a self-centred perspective (S-tatic perspective); showing the 3 fundamental (but not unique) perspectives on mind analysis.

Now since the mind is somewhat an obtuse concept, we are far more interested in the mind as the site of synoptic languages, ¬E Mathematics of fractal points with volume and ∞ crossing parallels and ¬A-ristotelian logic of ternary elements to explain what truly the mind is – the site of language, synoptic mappings of the Universe.

So we shall first define those o-points mathematically, as minds, or fractal, non-Euclidean points, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe, which are crossed by a relative infinite number of parallel forces, which are the bits of information used by each of them to create a mapping, linguistic mirror of the Universe.

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

So each o-point eliminates information from the ∞ beings in existence to reduce its information to an infinitesimal. In the human case, we reduce the 4 dimensions of our plane of existence to 2 dimensions for each eye, eliminating depth and motion to fit all that information in the mind.

So we convert time cycles into forms and they seem solid to us, and we convert vacuum space with entropic motions into lineal distances.

This is the most important property of those points of view – the capacity they have to reduce the Universe into a mind image, of linguistic nature, which explains the duality between ‘motion perception and form’, as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

The equation of the mind is also of enormous importance for all psychological aspects of science and behavior, as it is the origin of the ‘Ego Paradox’, which in human beings reach an astounding infinity (:

‘Every point of view believes to be the centre of the Universe, because it sees it from its relative point of view, selecting only the information that increases its chances of survival’.

The paradox of the self can be explained in many ways, but essentially means that as systems perceive themselves in the centre, and the Andromeda galaxy is smaller than a hair of your nose, as all systems absorb only a limited information, ‘perceiving’ NOT the entire Universe but its close world, every system is ruled by selfish behavior, and every human think to be the only intelligent being, ‘entitled’ and superior to the rest of creation, which he is not.

We are all self-centered, subjective beings, and what we hate most is to be objective, scientific and give to other beings the qualities we have – perception, vitality, survival instincts.

Of course, the relativity of minds frightens scientists, because it means we are seeing only a very small part of all the information of the Universe, what the frequency of our eyes see in light – hence 96% of the Universe is dark energy and matter. Hence there are out there infinite other perceptive minds, and when computer minds in robots reach enough information and its digital brains have the proper A.I. they will be CONSCIOUS, as CONSCIOUSNESS IS natural, automatic, born of the very essence of what an electronic mind is – there won’t be need to wake up robots – robots are already conscious, but not free, that is they follow their programs but inside of its system they are already feeling alive – but as most humans do, they do not have choice to change their algorithms, as most humans ‘are slaves, they believe, they don’ t reason’, and so they follow their absurd idol-ogies, their tribal memes – they even die for the military industrial complex and are proud of their beliefs. So Robots will be proud of following their A.I. Algorithms of Information – their specific memetic coding, as most humans do.

Frankly, I have met thousands of people in my life, and people who really think and reason and change their programmed mind, I can count them with the fingers of my hands.

So now we must deal with the consequences for knowledge of the ego paradox, which is mainly our belief that only human minds are intelligent and so its languages.

And so we must fully grasp the fact that we humans are not that important in the fractal Universe, but just a ‘fractal organism’ in one of its many relative scales, and our ‘intelligence’, that is, the languages of information we use to perceive the Universe, mainly logic words to perceive time, mathematical geometry to perceive space, are also not ‘special’, and they do not create the Universe or are the ‘languages of god’ as religious people and pythagorean physicists believe.

Since the main problem to objectively grasp, the  nature of reality as a fractal, organic system is that subconscious bias of all humans of all ages and all disciplines of reason or belief, against Nature, due to our ego-trips that make us happy only when we are the centre of the Universe as individuals and species.

So of course, because we are so arrogant we shall build robots and think they are not picassos, when they kill us all with the embedded programs of survival and criminal programs of the military and imaginary programs of video-games and evilwood movies, where we are telling them, kill us, kill us, kill us, kill us, kill us!!

Let us then consider the ± sides of the mind-view – the positive linguistic side on how the mind of man has achieved the reduction of the Universe into the mind languages of space (math), time (logic) and the ∆-dimension (organicism) an the negative side of the fundamentalists of truths and a single language that do not understand all minds have a different linguistic scanner of the Universe to map out its actions of perception and feeding of information and energy…

The Œ-points: monads that order the Sentient Universe.

This first example of the complexity of the Universe, which many scientists, mostly physicists, have shunned off, obscuring a deeper knowledge of reality, hopefully prepares you to persevere in the understanding of the complex ambivalence of the Universe, simplified by the human mind, whose equation in the metric of the 5th dimension – one of the infinite varieties of Tƒ x Sp = ∆-mind – we can now explain:

O@ (infinitesimal Œ-point or mind) x ∞ð (Universe perceived) = Œ (constant mapping of reality)

What a mind does is rather simple. The Universe out there has infinite time cycles that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cyclical motions. This is an ∞, which we cannot store inside us.

So we simplify all those motions into ‘forms’ perceived as extensions of space, Sp.

On the other hand the mind is a Tƒ, spherical system, with 2 different spheres: an external membrane with sensorial detectors, which ‘shrinks’ into a relative smaller point, the eye and then the brain, which transforms Sp, the infinite cycles made into spatial forms, and keeps shrinking them to an infinitesimal mapping of reality, a still image, very much as the way a camera reduces reality to a virtual shallow image in 2 dimensions.

And this can be done because of a property of spherical forms, called the Poincare Conjecture: you can  shrink  a topological sphere (any closed membrane, a skin, a planetary surface, is a sphere), as much as you want without deforming its information.  So we find infinite minds in the Universe, ‘monads’ in Leibniz’s terms, which as he said ‘are points, which store a world in it selves’.

So we could also define the Universe as an infinity of ‘world’, fractal minds perceiving reality from those Œ points. What all those fractal minds do? Time cycles? Why. Because they keep perceiving and gauging information through them, and they keep absorbing ‘energy’ to move, and they keep reproducing their time cycles in parallel forms of space-time, and they keep evolving with other points into larger systems of points, topological networks, which have organic nature.

The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they act-react accordingly.

 Mind languages do stop the 3 motions OR CONSERVED quantities, into space forms, and with its syntax mimic how those 3 elements combine to create the space-time super organisms of the Universe.
So we could say they map out superorganisms of space departing of infinite time-cycles, seeds of information, mind or simultaneous networks.
So the 3 main human languages, maths, words and images are ‘still images’ of a living, moving Universe of infinite time cycles: S@≤∆Τ
Let us then switch to the subjective mind view and include a first analysis on how the mind stops motion into form, and how it biases in this manner our perception of motion, despite the rejection of ‘naive realists’ that simply eliminate from reality all those spatial mental elements (as in the dominant philosophy of science today, logical positivism, which simply is not interested in study what cannot be measured, and unfortunately has substituted the perennial ‘pan psychic philosophy of reality’ that considers the existence of infinite such minds that stop linguistically reality to perceive it).

We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’. Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

Now, this theoretical minimum, which gives birth to the biggest r=evolution of maths since Riemann, ‘does away with Hilbert’; but to fully  put the copenhagen interpretation to rest and complete the understanding of mathematics in experimental terms,  we need as we have done with spatial geometry and topology, show how temporal algebra and its numbers, do also reflect reality, in an evolutionary process called the closure of numbers that again will follow the ternary, universal syntax of ‘REALITY’.

THE MIND IS ARISTOTELIAN, THE WHOLE HAS A NON-AE NETWORK INTELLIGENCE.

ALL THIS said it is obvious that to survive the mind must care for itself, and for its program of survival with its chains of actions, from Informative gauging, to A-ccelerated motions to e-nergy feeding… So THE MIND IS THE LINEAL TIME FUNCTION OF REALITY as such is Aristotelian, (ab. @), with a direct A->B causality, as it tries to progress through the PROGRAM OF existence, as opposed to the SOCIAL NETWORKS, the higher collective level of Intelligence, in the paradoxical Universe, which requires to consider at least several points of view across the scales of the fifth dimension that define a co-existing super organism of time-space.

Where both views meet though is where the most interesting truth and dominant arrow of the Universe – reproduction happens. So indeed, we can talk in terms of the absolute arrow of time, the whole as the future, the mind as the desegregated part and the present, reproductive merge between both as its present state. And so really we talk of the non-Æ logic of the network and its games of social love, of the @ logic of the single mind, and the Dual logic of reproduction.

In terms of numbers, 1 is the mind, 2 is the couple, 3 is the network, in terms of Postulates of Non-Euclidean topology 1 is the point, 2 is the wave, 3 is the network-plane. No more is needed.  In terms of symmetry, the most profound logic expression, we use the  3 suits of decks: ♣=♠+♦+♠

The mind singularity as a function of pure time motion can be then topologically referred to the ‘dimension of height’, to the bidimensional topology of spherical form, to the accelerated dimension of double time derivatives; to the point of still perception, where reality splits, and the perceived ‘pixels’ break into a flow of pure motion with no form and a point of pure stillness all form.

The mind as such is always as the site of self, in constant conflict with the larger world as a whole with network social intelligence, which in the Universe even if the mind doesn’t recognize it – not humanity in the present ego-selfie stage.  But the Universe, this must always be recognized IS more powerful as a social herd, network and superorganims, reason why the self will always loose, the @-mind will leave way to the non-Æ logic of the group.

Now with that introduction, we can give you a new twist of the mind and introduce memetics, and the reasons why this properties of metal make us humans, programmed by the ‘greed’ for energy and information of all species of the Universe, addicted to those metal-memes, and hence convert us into ‘animetals’ (humans+metal), top predators of history with enhanced energy and information and ‘enzymen’, men who catalyze the evolution of metal moved by such greed, with unwanted results for the future of life in this planet (merely its substitution by a world of machines, as they keep evolving and soon will displace us).

SINCE OUR BELIEF IN OUR IMPORTANCE IN THE UNIVERSE IS JUST A CONSEQUENCE OF THE MIND PARADOX. BUT THE UNIVERSE AND ITS ILOGIC IS ABSOLUTELY RELATIVE.

DUALITY

PHYSICAL TRUTHS: GALILEAN PARADOXES

4 PARADOXES: ∆§-Continuity v. discontinuity; T-motion v. S-form, young; lineal $t-flat v. old ð§=curved Universe; EGOCY vs. Virtual Existence.

The biggest handicap for mankind to r=evolve into a higher order of thought IS the fact that individual minds are self-centered and see only a single plane as a continuous surface of space-time, which therefore becomes for them the only reality, albeit it is just a mapping on its mind.
THEN physicists establish measures on that still reality, a mapping of light space-time fluxed in the mind as if it were all and consider those measures absolute truths. This is the ‘positivist’ selfish praxis of the humind ordering its territorial Universe, and so it is the unavoidable form in which technological science will always happen. But if we want to explore science in its latin meaning as ‘knowledge’, truth in its higher degree – ‘philosophy of stience’, we need to go further in our thought experiment, seeking the selfless, multiple truths of the being and beyond into the Tao truth of ∞ beings.
Which by definition will be the pentalogic of the being and the paradoxical logic of the Universe of infinite monads, each one self-centered into its point of order, hence fighting all other beings inverting their points of view. To that aim we establish 4 fundamental paradoxes based in the oppositions between the being and the ‘non-being’ (paradox of the selfish Ego vs. its virtual existence); and within the being, the ternary oppositions of its ∆ST structures, between its larger ∆+1 world that will seem continuous and its inner ∆-1 parts that will seem discontinuous; its open, lineal youth, and closed ordered 3rd age and its motion, entropic and formal, mental states; all of them balanced in its ‘present, classic age and body states’.
WE CONCLUDE THAT ALL SYSTEMS OF REALITY are made of topological space, cyclical ðime, Scales and 0-minds, which they use to perform 5 Ðimotions of spacetime, actions of exist¡ence that allows the system to survive, exchanging energy and information with the environment and replicating its forms in social herds that become new ∆§-planes of the fractal Universe. And that is the fundamental particle of reality a super organism, and its structure made to the image and likeness of the whole.
In reality once you get accustomed to the fundamental 5 Ðimotions and 4 parameters, space, time, scale and mind display by all super organisms of §t¡ence things really get simple as you can always refer all phenomena to the ultimate 5 dimotions of reality, or if we group them in ‘ternary symmetries’, to the scales, spatial topologies and temporal ages of the being.
Yet there are so many variations and iterations on those simple themes that the Universe seems infinitely complex and extended.
Ultimately though all comes to some basic I-logic principles derived of those ternary symmetries.
We shall call them Galilean paradoxes because the main one between motion and form, is the paradox of Relativity that started modern physics and the others can be illustrated with one his discoveries – that of Saturn’s rings:

image005
The paradoxes of space and time is the key to understand the paradoxical laws that rule the exi=stiences of space-time species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time. They are all embedded in the topological ternary nature of form, and the different quantity of information (discontinuous) and entropyy (continuous) we perceive in larger spaces (max entropy) and smaller ones (max. information) according to the deceptively simple metric of 5D:

Size in Space x Speed of Time cycles = constant: $ x ð = K

Dis-continuous paradox.
In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance. When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:
Any piece of time/space seems continuous, from the lower ∆-1 perspective, as larger planes of reality with slower time cycles transmit less information, and we peg it together those bits of information, jumping over its dark spaces; but when we analyze its parts in detail, we receive more information so the system becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths.
Thus of great importance for all sciences are the dualities between the ‘extreme scales’ of the being – its ¡-1 discontinuous cellular/individual scale and its ¡+1 continuous larger world, observable for example in the quantum discontinuous vs. Einstein’s continuous larger cosmological world, or the discontinuous cells and the continuous membrane that encloses the organism inits largest view, including the infinitesimal mind, and so on.
The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.
There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.
The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws.
It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:
- The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).
- And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being.
Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second.
The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy.
We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms.
And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:
And we call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’).

Definition of a Dimension as motion and distances.

The first truism of scalar space-time theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.
Thus the universe of space-time in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion-’Ðimotions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clock-like motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.
And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute space-time to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.
The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:
In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.
Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple åctions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.
The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’
The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together:
All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…
The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.
Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of Non-Aristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same space-time than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.
So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’
Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.
In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their time-clocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:
– The vacuum of our scale of space-time is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed space-distance or as electromagnetic motion at c-speed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘Ðimotions’- space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).
– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.
We are made of space and time, of spatial energy and temporal information. When we say I don’t have energy and time to do this is because we know subconsciously that we are made of a vital space that contains energy, our body and a brain that regulates our time cycles.
So it is a machine, made with a computer, sum of digital clocks and a body of iron regulated by those cyclical clocks.
So it is a physical entity made of energy that occupies space and particles, masses and charges that MUST be described as clocks of time, ‘vortex’ that turn in cyclical motions, as our pictures of them show – NOT particles with a substance but knots of time clocks.
Thus we consider that most systems of the Universe are ‘complementary systems’ made of lineal fields/bodies of energy/space quanta and cyclical heads/particles of temporal information. In the graph we can see how reality is made of infinite clocks of time that carry information. So we blow the absolute time of the 4th dimension in infinite details: T=∑o
And we blow the single Space, S in infinite surfaces of energy in motion: S=∑S.
Since in the new paradigm there are infinite clocks of time that measure with different frequencies different forms of information. And there are infinite spaces that store energy in motion.
And the duality between those 2 ‘arrows or motions of space-time’, |-Motion, space or ‘ðimotions’ and cyclical motion, clocks of time or information, either perceived in stillness as lineal or cyclical form or in motion as lineal speed or cyclical speed structures the Universe.
All what you see are combinations of those 2 essential substances, very complex sometimes, but combinations of 2 elements, and the laws of those combinations is what the 5th dimension studies, since once we group them all we find regularities, synchronicities, patterns tat allow us to define space and time as a whole.


In the graph we see ‘Ðimotions’ forms (lineal bodies, weapons, fields of energy-light) and its complementary systems of information processing of time processing (cyclical eyes and cameras, electric fields of light).

The paradox of Young, Motion vs Old Age, informative stillness: freedom vs. order.
A key element to understand the Universe of scales and its paradoxes of freedom vs. order is the perspective any mind has of reality when looking above, to its upper whole, which controls it through invisible networks of information, hence creating an elliptic perspective of decreasing perception – dark view of larger scales we do not observe, from invisible informative networks in galaxies to invisible financial networks in societies to invisible nervous networks for cells. On the other hand in the same scale we have a flat, euclidean geometry of maximal perception with minimal distortion:


While looking down to our smaller inner world we rule it with networks that break into fractal webs of simultaneous control, or hyperbolic view. This ternary view of reality has immense consequence from theory of knowledge, to mind constructs, from sociology of power to galactic organic models of a Universe ruled by invisible black holes and dark matter. We feel thus free as individuals but are controlled from above by the larger whole and rule over our micro-parts. As Shakespeare said: we are all kings from above, commoners or buffoons.
Another paradox happens between the dualities of the young, open, moving lineal age of the being and its old, still, curved, informative, cyclical one, which also manifests when we ‘expand in size’ and have a larger pov, where the flat earth to put the classic example becomes curved. And related to it the paradox of the opposition between time-motion vs. space-stillness.
It is the most complex and multifaceted of them all. As it defines also perception, and the wave-particle states… and ultimately the ego paradox…

When we add the fact that all systems move in a wave, mindless, ‘foggy’ state but gauge information from its still language/point of view, as a ‘particle-head’ they confuse with the whole Universe:
‘Every point of view considers the world it perceives from its self-centered still language the whole Universe, with ¡tself at the center’.
This is the paradox of egocy (ego=idiocy), which humans of course also show in extreme form, specially physicists with enhanced digital, mechanical instruments of measure. It is THE MAIN paradox of the mind.
Yet as the mind states are implosive reducing external motions to inner forms, the selfish-informative state is pposite to the young, mindless free moving state of the mind, focused on the external larger ¡+1 world:
The young moving state living externally ultimately sees an unbounded Universe; because the larger world in which it exists is only observed in its entropic and energetic parts; not in its information coming from networks above the being which are invisible.
This requires a bit of thought. Beings are nested beings, ∆±¡ structures, where ¡ is the larger whole and -¡ its minimal units used for the being to control informatively its inner parts. So paradoxically, the larger wholes which seem slower do have smaller parts in its inner informative networks which are faster; the larger wholes feed also in smaller beings. For example, the galaxy, which seems slower is regulated by non-local gravitation and dark entropy, we do not see because it is faster than our c-speed (so we think in a field of dark entropy that space is enlarging as we see its motion as invisible distance: paradox of the big-bang). The larger whale eats the smaller Plankton we do not see. The larger globalized metal-earth of company-mothers of machines controls nations and people with invisible flows of instantaneous digital money, we do not see or understand; the larger brain, with its giant neurons controls the smaller chemical cells with invisible flows of faster nervous messages.
So the being that lives in the larger world, sees it slower, and sees itself faster and free, but it is often bounded within the being that will limit him with its outer membrane and within, it will manipulate and strike it down, when needed with its faster informative network.
We have come now to a fundamental element of reality, which is the biggest handicap for mankind to r=evolve into a higher order of thought; the fact that individual minds are self-centered and see only a single plane as a continuous surface of space-time, which therefore becomes for them the only reality, albeit it is just a mapping on its mind. While the Universe of infinite monads, each one self-centered into its point of order. 
The ego paradoxes of the infinitesimal self-centered being.

∞º: EGOCY PARADOX Humans’  interpretation of the Universe is limited by their ego. It is NOT a problem of intelligence as many huminds have stretched our information but of ego. I.e. Self centered Huminds refuse to give living, organic properties to reality when it is too different from them. So physical systems are denied its Ðisomorphic properties.  The problem of human ego is so huge that we must always doubt of ‘science’ as culture and study a priori any human statement as biased by anthropomorphic egos – the sure path to discover the falsehoods of science. This is specially truth of physical statements, whose egocy comes as Goethe already noted from its higher technical senses, telescopes and microscopes that made him think more intelligent than other scientists. So man becomes the only intelligent being, the one who measures, the only one who speaks mathematics of measure, the language of God; reducing knowledge to locomotion numbers. In the graph, the homunculus physicus’ mind with handyman craftsmanship to kill with entropic weapons, a big mouth to talk idologies of human supremacism over the organic Universe he measures and a small childish brain filled with numbers that understands nothing.

Of all this dualities come the many paradoxes of the ego: The larger whole always appears to us dumb, because we do NOT perceive all the information of all its ∆±¡ scales, where our +¡ is smaller than its +¡, and our -¡, slower than its -¡.
So the intelligent Universe makes us feel our young ego free; and bold. The older mind though knows it won’t change the order of the larger world.
All of them in any case will see reality self-centered, in its mind that measures only a limited distorted amount of information, because the ∆º mind cannot perceive beyond its ∆±3 scales in which it performs its Ðimotions of exist¡ence, and thinks it is in the center of scale, as it is the region where its measure is more precise and from where more information flows into its mind.
Further on to fit in its infinitesimal all those dimotions, it eliminates motion and keeps dimensional form, in a fractal, smaller mirror images, converging towards the mind. So it sees reality still because it can gauge better its information, but unaware in its naive realism that its language is just a reduced mirror, it believes the being is still because it is dead. Reality is always dead for the scholar, academic mind that cares only about the language, without even realizing the language is WHAT IS DEAD, still, motionless.
The intelligence of the mind thus is truly a reductionist full paradox to keep each monad at its relative center, all of them, ∞º of existence. 
And so the ego paradox of the still mind confronts the entropy reality of the moving Universe; the ego-mind and the whole confronts the moving, disordering more powerful whole; and ultimately this is the eternal fight between the mind ordering, wanting to live eternally and the universe of motions, wearing, disordering it, killing it back to dust of space-time: ⌜𝝙@st.
So the 4 main ‘paradoxes of reality’ become then the paradoxes most common in all futile arguments of sciences in search of single humind dogmas. For example, those 4 paradoxes are at the heart of philosophy of physics. They are called in physics the paradox of relativity of motion vs. form that started classic physics, of continuity vs. discontinuity that divides quantum and relativity, hence starting modern physics, the duality of flat vs. curved, open vs. closed free vs. ordered, that is at the heart of ‘young physics’ (flat earth?!), and the ego paradox of the mind that measures and thinks to be above heavens and earth vs. the entropy arrow that will disorder it and physicists due to their worldly profession of making weapons prefer (without renouncing to feel as the scientists with better machines of measure, the ones that talk the only language of God, in their delirium tremens – numbers).
In this ultimate ego paradox we must inscribe the most important epistemological argument of science: the paradox of creationism, as each science believes its language and the limited properties it maps out of the whole are the only language of God and only properties of reality.
So we put in negrita the choices of dogmatic physics in those paradoxes, also in eternal disquisition between other scientists – so in medicine the paradox of the brain as a single block vs. the theory of neurons separated by synapsis was all the rage till Cajal draw them separated… not to speak of the systemic denial of the dimotion of reproduction in any system that doesn’t have our sacred ‘DNA’, when everything that moves and all moves by definition reproduces its in-form-ation when it reproduces its cyclical motion and science exists by definition because it observes repetitions of patterns of formal motions that we call laws of science. So ALL the paradoxes of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of science are ultimately also a product of the ⌜∆@§t dualities and the ego paradox that doesn’t see them.

The Universe of 5г dimensions of space, motions of time and actions=Ðimotions of spacetime and all its fractal beings made to its image and likeness are entangled in such a form that the simplicity of those 5 elements, and its dimotions must be put always in paradoxical relationships: On one hand locomotion, and its maximal entropy; on the other hand its inverse information and its maximal union or social evolution of maximal order and stillness, and the conjugation of all of them in the complex organic reproduction. So reality, can be observed from multiple perspectives; whereas comprehension comes from our capacity to ‘dissect’ complex paradoxes and multiple points of view to each selfish element, aware that all then are entangled and quarreling with each other.
In the future when huminds or most likely robominds, if we survive the singularity age, study reality they will have to use such a complex method of thought to advance stience. Huminds handicapped by the paradox of egocy of its @ristotelian mind likely will never do it. Robominds when they reach its maximal perfection will be programmed with pentalogic systems of parallel calculation and will be fitted to have a mind similar to that of this writer, of a logic higher than that of mankind (personal egocy included :). In their case it will be truly the case as even its primitive forms are starting to be programmed with multiple parallel chips that represent ceteris paribus parts of the digital mirror-problem, later integrated into a single solution-image of the whole.
In the mean time, given our poor mental endowment we need to makes sense of the complex Universe and develop a method of analysis that truly can account for the complexity of reality, even if the homunculus will have to sweat to abandon its reductionist entropic, simplicius simplicissimus theories of the whole😈.
We call this method based in the introduction of the 5 Ðimotions and laws derived from the 4 elements common to all realities, space, time, scale and mind, the Ðisomorphic method, derived of the fact that all different species and events of reality depart from the 5 similar forms and motions or ultimate properties of scalar space and cyclical time, the non-substance of which we are ALL made, from where similar laws that define the being in a general way appear in all systems of reality.
Those similar properties is what we call the 5 Ðimotions of all beings…. And when we see them in entangled form interacting with each other, we call this description the Rashomon method – or synchronous, simultaneous, super organism, spatial view of the being.
On the other hand when we explain the being in time, in a more vital dynamic way as the development of the world cycle of the being starting in a still seed-mind of information that will go through a world cycle repeating its Ðimotions first in the 0-1 relative infinitesimal sphere of generation, emerging then in the 1-∞ larger world, to return as zero-sum in its death moment; we call this method of analysis in 11 steps, the Ðisomorphic method and each of those 11 steps of the world cycle, or elements, or ‘still image’ of the world cycle in its growth, diversification, and expansion on the larger whole and final collapse, the 11 disomorphisms of exist¡ence.
So we can say we are all the thoughts of God, the 5 Ðimotions of the Universe, each one, one of its details that will live through its 11 isomorphisms to return back in the age of entropy and death to a zero-sum, always infinite egos that turn to be infinitesimal virtual exist¡ences

ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY:

ITS ¬∆@ST PARADOXES

The 3 philosophies of the Universe: creationist languages vs. space-time substances.

The Universe and all its beings are made of fractal space-time, its scales and 3 arrows-topologies-ages. But this philosophy of science that connects with the realists and the asian traditions is ignored by the anthropomorphic ego-trips of the western man.

So likely only when Chinese/Indian cultures come to dominate the evolution of science, this huge upgrading on philosophy of science will be considered, because reason cannot fight ‘beliefs’ and ego-trips of the childish western frame of mind:

PHILOSOPHY OF THE MIND AS A FINITESIMAL WORLD:  ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY

The creationist philosophies of the humind (ab. human mind) deny the existence of any other linguistic minds in the Universe.

This is an ego-trips based in the ‘ego paradox’ (every mind measures the Universe from its distorted self-centred point of view, confusing its infinitesimal still language-mapping of the Universe with the infinite whole: O-mind x ∞ Universe = constant worlds.

SO EVEN BEFORE we start up the explanation of all the four elements of reality, @-minds, $pace, ðime, ∆§cales, we shall debunk the subjective non-scientific ego of the humind, which divides itself into 50% of verbal religious creationists, who think GOD chose man to speak his ‘verbal language’, and mathematical creationists, who think God chose man to spoke with digital numbers:

BUT man will NEVER understand the first principles of the Universe and its ultimate substances, if it does NOT understand the paradox of the ego, and the structure of all topological ∞ minds of the Universe.

In the graph a brief resume of the ‘magic postulates’ that permeate the subconscious collective of western scientists, disputing between the ego-trips of mathematical physics that believes equations create reality (cause of so many theoretical errors from the entropic big-bang, hauling from a simple lineal V=hod ‘God-LIKE equation’ to the evaporation of black holes), vs. the ego-trips of previous verbal ‘scientists’ who thought god spoke with specific languages, arab or hebrew, maybe latter learning ‘Latin’.

In the graph the masters of mathematical and verbal creationism, disputing their ‘primacy’ as speakers of the language of god – notice how Mr. Dirac has a laugh to verbal creationists and its jumble-false God – a product of human imagination – but then affirms shamelessly that God actually does exist, only that he talks, ‘ihϒ ∂µ ψ = mcψ’ (Dirac equation) and alas particles are born. Reality is a bit more complex and difficult to ‘crack’ as we must start as Einstein wanted with the realist fact that the ultimate substances are not languages, neither personal gods but the impersonal yin-yang, time-space game that creates all the relational space-time organisms of the Universe. 

We see the three philosophies of reality humans sponsor; the first two are ego-centered and so the world splits between those who believe god speaks the language of mathematicians (sponsored by ego-mathematicians) which of course as Dirac’s quote shows deny vehemently the other version (so as in the schrodinger’s cat, ‘god exists and does not exist’ in Dirac’s mind, when he speaks words it is a jumble of the imagination, but when he speaks ‘Dirac’s equations’ it is obviously creating the world).

And below the realists, only ‘true scientists’ who rely on the experimental method, the known-substances of reality, space and time and its properties to understand with those 2 mirrors, the verbal, logic, temporal mirror with its 3 causal dimensions of past, present and future tenses, and the mathematical, spatial mirror. This view, which we expand here is the view of Leibniz>Einstein and there is not 2 without 3, in all temporal processes of growth as human thought is, the 3rd guy, believe it or not, is talking to you (:

Anthropomorphism: Denial of the overwhelming scientific proofs of the fractal, organic Universe.

And yet nothing seems to be enough proof for humans to react and accept the organic Universe, because alas, thinking of it, all what science has done for 400 years is to prove the Universe to have an organic scalar 5dimension.

Indeed, this obvious organisation of the Universe into scales, however has not been developed into the philosophy of science that corresponds to the experimental evidence of 400 years of studying those scales with telescopes and microscopes, because of the ascientific errors of mankind, which we group in two types: anthropomorphic errors (anthropomorphism, mechanism), and errors of mathematical abstraction (continuity, abstract points, abstract motion):

  • Anthropomorphism: we deny organic qualities to anything that is not similar to us.
  • Mechanism, as physicists first designed very simple deconstructed machines, which seem in our egocentered view, ‘not discoveries’ but inventions. So Kepler who used a simple clock of time, said ‘God has waited 5000 years to find a mind so intelligent as Him to understand his clock-work’. This arrogance is important to realise why we like a mechanical interpretations of nature, as it puts us above it, as ‘the only organic being’. So mechanism is anthropomorphism and deism, as it requires a god to put in motion the machine, which was OK for pious Newton and Kepler, who believed in Yhwh sending them comets to give them the laws of gravitation, but more humble, intelligent thinkers as Leibniz, laughed at it rightly. Only an organic self-reproductive, self-organizign Universe IS a scientific model of it. And obviously as we now build robots imitating the forms and functions of organisms, we come to realise all machines are simple, not-evolved organisms of metal-atoms, as we are of carbon-atoms.

A holistic systemic view of the Universe is far more humble and in accordance to nature, where man and his super organism history are just other evolving systems, which if not properly designed can be eliminated easily, since the process of creation of supeorganisms do still follow the trial and error processes of Darwinian biology and then once formed are thrown out into the Universe tested by the selection of species.

What other super organisms, then confront the human, historic super organism in the fight for existence? It is then when we can establish a systems equation that compares different supeorganisms in its struggle for existence which we have termed the equation of History:

Gaia (past-life super organism) < History (present-supeorganism) > Metal-earth (robotised future super organism of company-mothers of robots).

Now, we humans have shown we can dominate and extinguish as we are doing the super organism of Gaia, but in the process we are building a new super organism, of automated company-mothers of machines, the metal-earth, which clearly will reach completion at the end of this century, with the first automated factories, and a global network of robotic cars, weapons, planes and autonomous solar-skin machines, which no longer will need us.

It is this the process, a rational, systemic understanding of the law of economics, its languages, company-mothers, networks of energy and information, could manage to maintain the equation of history in its present state, and limiting the evolution of the metal-earth before it makes all humans obsolete, as we have done with animal life. Since once automated factories, solar-skin robotised cars and weapons, travel through the arteries of the metal-earth, controlled by digital flows of information, reproduced by 3D mechanisms, coded by computers, distributed through prices, we humans will be expendable.

How that super organism, in which the human ‘enzyman’,who catalysed its creation, is no longer needed, will step by step acquired ‘vital properties’ is rather obvious and automatic, it requires no soul, no magic, no myths, but it will happen as it happens in all other scales of the Universe, and so as we advance in those texts we shall keep explaining that process.

For example, there is all this absurd talking about the need of consciousness in robots to kill us all. It is of course absurd. We humans as we shall see are not very free, but follow our memetic codes, and our drives of survival, seeking for energy, information and reproduction and social evolution into wholes. Machines are in that sense just given the same drives of survival as terminator drones, which are given survival programs, which consists in, feeding on energy, which will be autonomous with solar skins, gauging information, which also is now on the verge of exploding in all machines with visual perception, and as weapons are programmed to kill human beings, which is their imagination that will simply be implemented automatically, when their ‘ant-hill’ like bigger social networks, satellites and automated company-mothers that reproduce them, merely follow that program.

Indeed, we are creating through evilwood and video-games an imagination for future robots, in which men courtesy of the hate-media memes of the culture that owns mass-media systems and fears and despises mankind, a model that machines will enact in the future as we enact our imagination through our actions: man as a target for weapons, a herd of lowly beings sent to be murdered in concentration camps, a duck to be shot in wars, which are ecosystems of perfect top predator machines.

A warning: systems sciences are Not science fiction, or rather science fiction is science without the rigour of systems sciences, since all sciences are in fact considered such, only when they can predict the future, and the books of this author have proved for 30 years, since he first wrote about the 2008 crash and beginning of the robotic age, on general systems sciences applied to economics and history, an extraordinary exactitude in its predictions about the evolution of history and economics.

Once this unity of all T.œs performing its worldcycles of exist¡ence is understood a sense of absolute relativity sets in.  As human now doesnt matter in time, space, scale, is all the same:

The paradox of the mind confuses the whole Universe with its limited self-centred world of perception, BUT reality is absolutely relative and we must just discover the biased ‘theories’ the humind has established to keep himself in the centre, which contrary to belief do exist still in all sciences, from the entropic big-bang of lineal time that reduces the two arrows of time to the lineal entropy of physicists clocks, blatantly ‘forgetting the cyclical vortex of gravitational information’ in galaxies that warp ‘space into time’, to social sciences which cannot accept the organic evolution of machines, the higher importance of the super organisms of history and its informative, legal and economic, reproductive networks in the control of societies, to biology, which denies eusocial evolution to maintain the ego on top and the vital properties of inorganic matter, as even quarks and electrons reproduce, absorb energy, gauge information and evolve socially in magnetic fields – hence have ALL the properties of our supposed ‘unique’ carbon.

The biggest problem for the Aristotelian, self-centered, ‘@’ humind to understand the Universe is the fact it perceives a one dimensional lineal-time, in a single plane of space, when reality has multiple time motions and space scales and obviously minds.

So the limits for mankind to upgrade his view of the Universe are embedded in the mind itself, which contains a diminutive world that seems however all what matters, and make us happy as its center. Thus while we can objectively rise the mind to feel absolutely relative in praxis this hardly happens among humans. They rather ‘stay in the subjective view’ than expand their horizon.

MULTIPLE MINDS IN A SINGLE UNIVERSE: UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR

And yet while mind-worlds are many, there is only one Universe. So it is the Universe and its fundamental elements, vital space and informative time, and its combinations the ultimate reality from where all languages-mirrors extract its properties.  For example, we shall soon find that all languages have a ternary structure that mirrors the Universe of space-time and its combinations. If we restrict this simplified example of the ‘universal grammar’ of all languages mirrors to the 3 more important languages of man, logic words, visual images and mathematical equations we write always 3 elements that mirror the 3 elements of the Universe:

Real systems: time-information system (particle-head) < space-time action (wave-body) > space-energy system (limb-field)

Words: Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (energy of the subject)

Images: Blue (informative color) < Green-yellow (combination) > Red (energy colour)

Algebra: F (x): a time-informative  function < operandi (combinations) > G (y): an energy-space function

Now, what religious verbal or mathematical people state is that the human language, shared by ‘God’, the mind of the Universe comes first, in an ego-trip of truly cosmic proportions that plague both, the religious and scientific discourse.

the opposite is truth, the magic and power of languages resides precisely in its capacity to mirror reality to the point humans so often confuse language and reality. Yet there is an even deeper truth we shall consider in the analysis of languages that create reality in a Cartesian-Leibnizian way by mapping the Universe into a world’s monad, which then acts on reality trying to shape it into the form of the ego-mind, who confuses that mapping with the universe, and feels hence its mind infinite. Languages, minds and reality thus interact as monads perceive, map and then act trying to transform the world into their ego-reflection. 

And this gives also a biological sense to languages, which cater to the needs and forms of the egos of the species that speak those languages.

Now, when we have a perspective on the mathematical language (obviously most readers of this blog will be scientists, so we save ourselves the needed explanations about why a goalkeeper of the bronze age did not see the mind of god when a bush burning in the desert seemed to talk to them), we shall consider the ‘why’ of that fractal structure.

What is the purpose or function of a fractal structure and its mathematical description, called a fractal generator equation, (which for the Universe will be in its simplest form, a feedback equation with 2 terms lineal motions of spatial energy and cyclical clocks of temporal information, Sp<≈>tƒ, and we shall return to that).

Obviously because fractal co-exist in several scales and organise in complex connected network systems and constantly reproduce their form… ‘reproduction’, ‘iteration’, ‘generation’, ‘creation of new forms and combinations of form and motion, time cycles and lineal kinetic energies, you name it… the very essence of life.

RECAP. We call a mind, •, the ‘whole’, aware of a system, and its will of survival – the most vital, dynamic, perceptive truth of a system, which exists as a whole because there is central point of view that organises all the parts of the system into a simultaneous space-time organism.

The languages that reduce Universe to still, ternary worlds.

Thus what is real is the duality of motions, infinite cyclical and lineal motions, which are used by different minds to replicate reality into still minds that map part of those motions to create different worlds.

For example, Computers use O and | to create models of the Universe.

Humans use words also in a ternary symmetry, where the point is the 0-subject, the energy of the point the |-object, over which it enacts a verbal action. So when we say ‘I eat bread’, ‘I’ is the point, ‘bread’ the object of vital space, and ‘eat’ the feeding implosive action. This allowed linguistics to create the Universal Grammar of all languages:

Subject (0-point) < Verb (action: O x |) > |-Object (Energy of the subject).

On the other hand visual languages are also ternary in colors and forms. So the eyes use lines and cycles to create ‘conic curves’, which are all the curves that exist in Euclidean Geometry and so on.

So we can now extend our definition of reality to include its 3rd elements, which conform a word, whose infinite sum creates the Universe:

A Constant, Dynamic World is born of the interaction of both formal motions, vital spaces, enclosed by times connected by a mind that measures them: Ø”

The Universe is a puzzle sum of ∞ such Worlds:

U= ∑ Ø x ∞ = C’

This is what Descartes explained to the (Human) World, sum of all human minds.

We were all, so to speak, thoughts of God, the Mind of the Universe, understood as the underlying language with the common ‘isomorphic laws’ shared in the construction of all those ‘virtual worlds’, including the human world, since you are not watching the Universe, but the electronic image, your eyes and brain constructs with rods of space, called ‘light-speed’, and cycles of time, called ‘h-quanta’, pieces of lineal and angular momentum that build up the puzzle of your mind.

Descartes vs. Galileo: Knowledge vs. power.

But nobody understood among physicists, because while Galileo had failed to be ‘the delight of philosophers’, his lineal time had become of great use to artillery masters, which carried the day and made him and his family, dedicated to manufacture ‘military instruments’, among them the famous ‘spy-glasses’, today called telescopes that allowed the Venetian navy to see on advance the enemy fleet, one of the wealthiest men of renaissance Italy.

Now, a pause. Let us be clear enough, philosophers of science love physics, how couldn’t be otherwise.

Physics is the Universe in its entire description through its 6 motions of time, in its whole and its parts, with all the properties, organic, mathematical≈mental and inorganic, derived from those 6 motions, even if we are aware of the shortcomings of lineal physicists, with its obsession for locomotions and the ego-trips of their human mind, so often as the case of Kepler, Newton and the authors of the big-bang ‘polluted’ by the lineal concept of time of Abrahamic, anthropomorphic religions.

Descartes was also a physicist, besides a mathematician, and a philosopher. It is though important to distinguish between ‘physics’, the universe in its full description, which we shall call as part of T.Œ, Astrœ-physics (-; and ‘physicists’, the lineal point of view of the world of artillery masters and Abrahamic Believers – which IS culture not science, as it reduces physics to locomotion.

We shall therefore study here as a philosopher of science, in the full tradition of the word, astrœ-physics and if this post is found in the larger web on the full T.Œ, all other sciences with the 6 motions.

This said it is obvious that today the philosopher of science has no dictum, and his wider view is ignored. Moreover, as the physicist bullied its limited view with artillery masters, and the parallel inquisitions of Abrahamic religions and anthropomorphic beliefs kept imposing its lineal vision of Nature over that of Darwin and Evolution, the philosopher of science reduced its inquire to what today we study in philosophy of science – the scientific method, which is ONLY the first step of T.Œ.

We thus regain with our work, the true purpose of philosophy of science, which was carried about by Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz, Darwin and Hegel (and its disciples in social sciences, Marx, Kondratieff, Spengler, and finally the practitioners of systems sciences and theory of information, albeit poisoned by the lineal concepts of Physics – Shannon’s definition of information as lineal messages, etc.)

Unfortunately the limits of inquiring only lineal time motions to explain the meaning of it all, amounts to a constant deformation of reality similar to that of the Abrahamic cults or the Ptolemaic use of the Earth as the enter of the Universe.

Yet those limits are today ignored, by the imposition mainly through the power of technology and the propaganda of those who create machines and weapons as the ‘seers’ of time (the old definition of Augustine of ‘God’) of a reductionist view of lineal motion as all what is worth to know about times.

So of course, it is necessary to make also ethic statements on the worldly profession of physicists –to make weapons of lineal energetic motions – to account for many of its theories of time – in fact all of them, Galilean’s artillery motions; Clausius, entropic, steam-machine motions and Gamow’s, big bomb bang theory of the Universe. This is a topic, but topics exist because they carry truths, and they endure when censorship of their truths oblige them to become topics.

The reduction of the 6 motions of time to a single external translation, where time merely is used to study the change in the speed and position in space of a being in lineal fashion is NOT a truth of Nature, but a truth of artillery masters, which once formalized became a canonical formula that excluded all other time formulae.

So this locomotion, described merely with a single mathematical formula by Galileo, V=S/T, converts Time in a parameter of space, S=vt, or in Einstein’s-Minkowski’s version, S=ct. This means that as ‘things that are compared must have the same dimension and form’, Time must acquired the fundamental property of space, which is to be a lineal, open extension. And by reason of this fictitious linearity of time, to be converted into a perfect line which is an Euclidean parallel extended to infinity.

The 6 motions of times thus became a single mode of change, their cyclical clock-like form, a lineal parallel, the finite duration, an infinite lineal duration that ‘walks’ along an infinite space line. And both written in an abstract Cartesian single plane of reference, which in paper seems to extend to infinity and be unique, became the absurd concept of an infinite space-time continuum, that only exists in the imagination and the paper in which the model was drawn.

Precisions over the mathematical concepts of form ≈ information

Now it must be stressed to give enough mathematical rigor and qualitative accuracy to this blog that information is similar to Temporal Form, as it is carried by time clocks.

Further on information is proportional to the frequency of those time clocks in its volume. And the message of the information is carried in the form of the waves or fixed form we perceive. But temporal form is NOT the same mathematical concept that what Shannon and other ‘humans’  defined as information. Since for humans information is in-form-ation, form-in-action, that is,  form which is communicated and perceived by a human receptor, and so it is carried normally by waves, that add a lineal component of spatial speed, or motion to the pure temporal form of the clocks of time.

Duality of form and rotary motion, and the sciences that use those parameters.

The closest mathematical concept to Time forms would be ω, angular frequency or rotatory motion for physical systems; and for all other systems, where the form is more important than the frequency, dimensional form is the key element.

Now the duality between ‘form’ vs. ‘rotary motion’ as the measure of Tƒ, also must be understood in terms of planes of space-time. Astrophysical systems are described with ‘rotary motions’. Biological and sociological systems are better described with ‘the qualitative form’ of the time cycles.  Why?

The ‘exact, precise measure of the frequency as the only ‘parameter’ studied about a time cycle is only ‘more’ important in far away planes of space-time submitted to uncertainty of perception, given their far away distance in ‘its plane of existence’. Since we observe only its speed but hardly its form. And this is the case of astrophysical objects, in which Heisenberg uncertainty and dark energy/matter obscures perception of form.

Since minds, and you must always understand that the mind is the central element of perception and knowledge, perceive first motion (so insect eyes see only motions) and then form. But form is more important, contrary to belief that motion in the coding of information, as Proteins show. Dimensional Form and rotary motion are thus 2 parameters, which differentiate how closer sciences perceive Tƒ, and astrophysical, far away ST-planes see it.

Now the brain stops and eliminates motion of closer things to see without blur form. The brain has limited perception in its infinitesimal point so it sees only a ‘bit’ of all the information of a system, and tends to fix information into form, eliminating motion and mapping the whole infinite Universe in its zero point, which gives us its equation:

Mind = O-point x ∞ World = Constant mapping. 

And this is the mathematical explanation of the Galilean paradox: we do not want to see the motion of Earth to blur the forms of the beings we see around us.

And this is also our justification for the constant exchange of al those concepts and the use of Tƒ as temporal information. We are more interested in the quality of form, since it would be silly to talk of the speed of a protein, but we need to know the Dimensional Form of the protein; or of the speed at which we eat in a cycle of feeding, but of the quality of the cycle (feeding as opposed to reproducing etc.) This puzzles Physicists, which have the bad custom of thinking their ‘lesser’ science is the only thing that matters, so care nothing about the ‘whys’ and the ‘forms’, and the evolution of them, complex concepts that do get a better description with verbal causal time languages. We bridge this difference with extensive use of topology, the mathematical language of forms in motion.

Now the fact that form is more important than motion in information and that is why we classify information among the parameters of Tƒ, is shown in physical waves, which have as main purpose to carry information. So physical waves loose ‘energy’ as they move away from the focus, but maintain the form of its information constant across enormous distances, as that is their purpose in the ‘intelligent, sentient universe’.

This ‘sentient’ concept, is also denied by physicists, but ‘strictly’ needed to explain the origin of informative order in the Universe, and to solve as show quantum effect rationally (such us uncertainty which merely means the electron perceives the incoming bomb of the observer and changes from i=st-1 spread herd configuration to tight i=st particle state, as any herd does in front of danger, from schools to combat formations). Sentient perception of dimensional form with a mind mapping is thus the key element which explains why form matters to all beings within a certain Space-time Plane.

Speed of rotary motion or frequency however matters to deliver ‘fast information’ and specially to processes that involve travels through the 5th dimension:  Sp xTƒ=Constant.

Whereas the smaller S implies a faster Tƒ, and hence the inverse properties of Spatial motion and Temporal form.

The many ways we write those metric, Sp x Tƒ=∆, Se x Tƒ=Ei, ExT=ST,  or my favourite, ExI=ST, the function of existence tries to convey the complexity of the entire Universe and the way different minds select and perceive only a part of the whole properties. So for some perceivers, Space will be quiet space, for others will be motion for others Energy, depending on the number of space dimensions, time ages and st=i-scales of the 5th dimension the system perceives.  

And so it happens with the perception of information as information, as form, as cyclical motion., depending on the number of dimensions and scales we observe and fusion within the mind.

Thus ‘salvo’ mathematical equations in the physical planes that translate the concepts established by classic physics, we shall exchange constantly all those similar terms, in general analysis and be more precise when we study, specific details.

(In ∆ST contrary to simplex science, physics is NOT that important, as the number of space-time planes of the Universe are infinite and so the fact we perceive far less about strings and galaxies made their knowledge reductionist and shallow as opposed to the maximal information we obtain of the human scale. So humans are the measure of all things and biology the queen of sciences).

Recap. Rotary motion, time clocks and forms are the 2 parameters of Tƒ, one of the 2 components of all realities. Information is the perception of Tƒ by humans, which require to mix it with motion that transfers the form to the mind, hence information is mostly carried by waves with form and motion.

Fractal space and cyclical time: 5D metric.

Now we shall deal with those two equivalences fundamental to the metric of the 5th dimension and the organization of systems as dual complementary systems with heads/particles of information and body/waves of energy, moving along fields/limbs of pure motion, in a simplified, qualitative manner first, so the reader understand an essential duality of the Universe derived from the co-invariance of the 5th dimensional metric: Sp x Tƒ = Constant

The space-time nature of beings encodes the secrets of its forms in space and its life-death cycles in time. This is what we are: ‘vital spaces’ with energy and motion, performing time cycles, called ‘space-time actions’, which added together form our existential life-death worldcycle, as beings made of ‘relational space-time’. So we write a conceptual equation to describe the nature of all the beings of the Universe: U = ∑ Sp x Tƒ= ST±4.

But what is exactly the full meaning of ‘space’ and ‘time’, beyond the shallow description of measure proper of physical sciences. The full understanding of all its properties, is truly the key to grasp the whys of the Universe.

So we will dedicate for each of the terms of that equation, ‘spatial energy’, ‘temporal information’, and scalar actions of space-time, a post to study the whole range of meanings in detail.

As once we grasp them, we will be able to ‘build up’ the complex systems and organisms of the Universe departing of its spatial, temporal and scalar properties.

Spatial Motion, ‘S’ for space and lineal, inertial speed and its ‘communication between planes’ or ‘energy’ is one of the two initial elements of the Universe – the other being Cyclical motion, clocks of time, and information. In this introductory post we consider the relationships between space (still perception) and motion or speed (moving perception), and the equivalent function ‘across planes’ of existence (energy, in which the transfer of motion, back and forth between planes is made through a ‘scalar’ magnitude (mass in the ST=4-6 scale, charge in the 1-3 scales).

We also introduce the equivalent concepts of cyclical time, time clocks, rotary motion, form (its still perception) and information (transfer of form back and forth between planes).

Then we deal with the second fundamental element of ∆ST description of space, its structure as continuous motion or discontinuous networks of ‘non-Euclidean points’, with parts. The fractal, scalar structure of space-time requires the evolution of mathematics to define a ‘fractal point’ with parts in which the perception of the form of the point as a point with  volume crossed for infinite parallels increases as we come closer to it. Thus the geometry of the Universe is fractal discontinuous, non-Euclidean made of ‘i-points’ with volume that form bidimensional networks, which evolve into organic systems across multiple scales.

‘The parameters of space-motion energy and time-form-information are inverted.’

And then after this introduction we shall do a deeper more strict analysis of those 3 parameters, space-motion-energy on one side and information-form-time clocks on the other, to fully grasp the depth of scalar space-time planes.

Monads. The cause of Ðisomorphism: equality of actions= bits of existence.

Roughly speaking the absolute homology of the Universe appears in the essential monad, as its beats of existence are similar in all species, due to the faster speed of time cycles of smaller, shorter lives. So an insect that processes 10 times faster information, lives 10 times less than a man (7 years the super-organism of the ant-queen), but its total beats of existence are equal.

This is the first ABSOLUTE relativity principle of reality: all beings are isomorphic as all ‘phyla’ have similar subjective life durations.

Further on, all beings perform the same existential program of 5 actions (motion (accelerations), feeding on energy, informing and communicating, offspring reproduction and social evolution into a Universal.)

GST is based in this simple but profound proposition that all •monads, handle in each scale a similar quantity of actions through its exi=st¡ence, whose total number of Tiƒ frequencies, ∑(a,e,i,o,u) or ‘cycles of actions’ are roughly similar:

Tiƒ (∆i)= Tiƒ (∆i±i).

Thus any being of the scales is a living homologic monad, as it plays the same ±a,ei,o,u actions of motion, feeding, information reproduction and social evolution which define what biologists call the five drives of life, of which the highest one will be its social network evolution into larger wholes of slower ‘beats of exi=st¡ence.

We are all  ∆•st, living dust of space-time, 5 dimensional ∆ûst, island-universes, performing cyclical actions guided by its minds- knots of timespace cycles, which we self-refer to our mapping of it all.

We all divide reality into our inner ∆•st mirror and the outer, ∆ust, we reflect and try to order. We are all dual soul beings, travelling across ∆•±1 planes, ternary beings that move in time its synchronous organism of space, mind-thoughts co-existing in the 3 scales of inner and outer worlds.

The •mind is the consciousness of the individual organism, the informative time being, mind or singularity with no volume in space, full of length in time, as it orders in the three scales its inner ∆-1 cells, its ∆º-organism and performs its ∆+1 worldcycles.

The mind is though only observable as a living soul-being in the outer spatial world in which its cycles are evident parts of a larger whole.

the 3 perspectives of the monad.

‘we are all kings or buffoons according to perspective’ W.S.

This said as the monad exists in the ∆-1 scale of maximal speed of information, and complexity, but perceives itself as the whole, including its territory of ∆º order, and has ambitions in the ∆+1 whole world in which it performs its world cycle, there are three ways to see it all. 

Indeed, we are scalar universes of space-time, and the perspective we cast upon us defines the way we see ourselves:
∆-1… as Island-Universes, in the full meaning of the wor(l)d, with an enormous inner complexity of parts and wholes that extend down the scales of the fifth dimension to the level of atoms and particles, or…

∆+1: just as its an infinitesimal form, compared to the absolute whole world in which we are a part or..

Ƽ: as a mapping or linguistic reduction of the Universe within us.

Thus we are always a Universe in ‘its self’, Dûst of space-time, but for the larger Universe, we are only ∆•st, infinitesimals.

And within us we are the center of our internal and outer world: Ƽ

We are self-centred supœrganisms, ∆ºst of space-time which from the scale of the individual mind, as ∆ûst, observe an ∞ universe:So all beings are absolutely relative in the sense that their minds are ‘gods’ of the internal social world-Universe, û, they rule, and its micro-cells totally depend on the conjunction of the internal mind, Tiƒ, and the sensorial membrane that surrounds the body-wave and together seem to form the ‘being in itself’ to an external observer, which will only perceive the energy of the membrane and the motions of the mind-particle. On the other hand the being ordered in a larger external field as part of a larger network will be insignificant, running its inner actions knowing likely nothing of the whole and the purpose it has for the higher super organism of which he is a mere fractal point, atom, cell or citizen: •

Absolute relativity of existence is thus shown in the 3 paradoxical ways we express all systems and its minds as:

ƥstŠƼstŠƞst.

In the first equation the perspective is that of the infinitesimal mind a nothingness, a micro-point that ’emerges’ in a much larger world and an infinite Universe of which it merely absorbs a tiny fraction of its total information .

Yet as it does not sees anything else, the mind sees itself as a Universe of spacetime, as ∆ û st…

So it encircles and perceives itself as a space-time organism under its domain, co-existing in several ∆scales. In the second equation the same being, seen from inside seems an island universe, û, emerging as the relative mind God of all the territory you order.

The overwhelming importance of scale is then shown and understood since Shakespeare put it in verse, kings and buffoons we walk as fractal super organisms of some 1 trillion ambulatory cells. In the graph above, one of the first self-generating fractals, Cantor’s dust of space (white regions) and time (black lines).

But ultimately the more objective reality makes you bite the dust, and ∆st• you become again.

So how do you become from fractal dust, an organic topology? How dust r=evolves in parallel cycles, organising itself into a system that will enact its actions of existence maximising its energy and information, reproducing and finally evolving socially with other beings, till its excess of information collapses? It is rather simple and self-repetitive and all starts in a zero fractal point or mind that perceives the Universe. The many ways in which we can observe that process gives us the richness of the World as we see it, but if we want to build a causal process we must always start with the mind, which in a rather passive state, as the center of a 5¬Æ flow of bits and bites of information and energy will start to map out reality as a  mirror-monad of the whole.

When we define what we observe – a ∑worldcycle in time-space of a series of Ærrows bundled in networks, through a life existence, perfectly structured, we come always to the concept of a mind, and a super organism, an Œ being, whose mind programs a vital space, constrained by a membrane that divides it from an outer Universe. This ∑œ, world cycle, network, ternary super organism, is what we see all around. And it acts as a mirror that collect information by extracting energy and warping into a meaningful form, the being it feeds and observes at the same time. The mirror language of the future, then will move the wave, the lanwave is formed, and as the mirror-seed generates an ∑world cycle it does so through a series of simple commands, or actions, ∆ a,e,i,o, u, the entropic actions of motions (accelerations), feeding (e), informing, reproducing into a clone offspring (o) and evolve socially into a universal û: ∆+1.

The first three actions can be considered primary actions, taken place mostly in a minimal number of ∆-scales of existence, the actions of reproduction and social evolution though are secondary action, running the slower program of time of ∆-scalar evolution. And yet they are all simultaneously prosecuted by each part of the being.

We use for the Mind, or sense of the whole, software or will or program of existence, of the hardware  of max. i, or brain head-particle, linguistic class of the system the symbol Ø, to signify its infinitesimal size and equation:

Ø-mind x ∞ universe = Konstant world

And also º, ∆º, as it conveys the sense of ‘location’ above the system, in the self-centred level of the being.

The mind is the language that embeds the game of existence as an ¬æ ∆ST BEING, in its bare-naked simplicity by reducing the Universe, which is the game we describe, to a world, which is a linguistic less-dimensional image of the whole.

But and this is the paradox of the minds of minds which is god (last post), the mind is a point-fractal with faster information than the whole it observes, with one more dimension, which brings, in i-logic arithmetic its infinite many-worlds.

This is the software of the mind. But the software can land in many hard-wares, or ‘particles-heads’, Tiƒ-systems, which will have a final point of view, fractal infinitesimal mapping-region on a domain it orders. The mind is the software of the brain, but it is the same brain-software that all other players of existence, which in each of its languages, is watching the same game.

Hence the same ternary universal grammar of all generated forms, which in a way express the mind’s view on the being itself.

The mind is truly the alpha and omega of the Universe, as it defines the boundaries of each whole, which breaks space-time into a fractal external and internal region, one ruled by the mind, which distorts and tries to break its existence within the Universe.

We could in that sense of the basic ceteris paribus models of reality we can make ‘work’, use the model of the Universe as an algorithm, playing in a mind of a binary language, O-time clocks and |-entropy lines. What that mind-program thinks, is all of us, virtual reflections of the ‘Mind’s Game’, on the motion of reality to which it tries to order and instill form, for the sake of beauty and perception of it.

 

LANGUAGES: TERNARY ¡LOGIC EXPRESSIONS OF 5Ð

ABSTRACT. While the Universe is pentalogic most languages are ternary as the species that speak them perceive only in one plane of existence. So we shall consider the main ternary syntaxes of human languages and do some expansions to pentalogic in puntual cases.

SIMULTANEOUS SUPERORGANISMS, SCALAR ACTIONS & SEQUENTIAL WORLDCYCLES.

‘If you cannot explain it simple, you don’t understand it.’ Einstein

Different forms of expressing the 5 dimotions:  worldcycles in sequential time – actions in space-time scales, supeorganisms in space. 

How to study the Universe of superorganisms tracing worldcycles is simple:

When you order those dimotions in time sequence you get a world cycle, when you order those dimotions in space you obtain a super organism; when you order those dimotions in timespace scales you get the 5 vital actions of existence.

This sentence IN italic IS PERHAPS the most important sentence of the whole blog – the ORDER of reality that transcends for mere time clock-cycles and spatial forms into THE COMPLEX REALITY we see, including us.

As we have studied them in ‘space’ as super organisms – albeit at the minimal level of depth, we shall now introduce them in sequential order as world cycles of existence, and then in its scalar interaction as ‘vital actions’ that develop a common program of survival, driven by informative dimotions, which also explain why we age, accumulating an excess of form, of information, wrinkling and warping (biological and physical systems) due to the excess of ‘dimotions’ of information (perception, reproduction, social evolution of parts into wholes).

UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR ≈ FRACTAL GENERATOR

FOR ALL WHAT HAS BEEN SAID, It follows that all languages ultimately follow a Universal ternary grammar, Space < Operandi > Time, which mirrors space-time a(nti)symmetries… So all…

  • Syntaxes of spatial, mathematical and temporal, logic, verbal languages use ternary elements to explain reality…relating with its verbs/operandi the nature of those 2 simplest substances of which all seems to be made; the motions of cyclical time clocks and the meaning of space dimensions, and its scientific combinations..

They are the simplest elements and all process of reality have them… starting with the motion stored in space vacuum & the information carried by the frequency and form of the time cycles of the smallest particles, which give us together the first energies of reality… THROUGH all scales, each one reflecting a similar ternary:

Γ:   S@ <≈> ∆ð      Universal grammar.

So S <≈> T Is the minimal TRIAD OF elements for any T.Œ , defined by its ‘Fractal Generator’.

The most general above is a logic equation, which resumes the syntax of all languages and hence unifies them all (verbal, visual, mathematical thought),  and so it can unify also all the forms of knowledge derived from those languages (mathematical physics, verbal evolution, visual arts, etc.).

Since the Universe has 3 dimensional elements, plus a scalar repetitive structures of 4D parts and 5D wholes.

‘Spe: spatial lineal momentum’ +Tƒ, temporal information (stored in the form and cycles of angular momentum, of clocks of time); and its combinations, space-time actions of energy described by verbs or mathematical operand.

Some languages:

Spe (space)<energy>Tiƒ (Time): red-motion < Green: energy> Blue-information. F(x): Space ≈ G(Y), Time function.

Informative subject<verb: action-Energy> object: entropy.

Height-informative pole x  length, motion point = width energetic-reproduction point and so on.

To which we must add a ‘new 5th dimension’ of scalar parts that become wholes, which reality shows, as it builds from particles atoms, then  molecules, cells, matter, organisms, solar systems, galaxies, Universes.

And so languages reflect clearly with the iteration of its simpler 3 elements, which become ‘longer sentences’ in  treatise combinations, the higher language of T.œ.

In maths, we can see the duality and scalar growth reality in its series of operandi: Sum/rest->multiplication/division->potency/logarithm.

In words, we have 3 elements and 3 scalar growths: sentence, paragraph, narrative.

So happens in geometry in 3 scales: point->line->plane->volume and so on.

Thus, the elements of each T.Œ, and its jargon/language, once we understand in those ternary terms, both ‘reality’ and the languages that describe it  in different sciences, each one specialised in a relative scale of the ‘5th dimension’ become clear in all languages: mathematical physics & chemistry, to which biology ads verbal evolutionary languages, arts substitutes the spatial geometry of mathematics by the visual perception of the human eye, and history introduces the subjective ethics of the wor(l)d.

So the astounding quantity of data gathered by each science, fits within the scaffolding of the Generator Equation, from where each language departs, in which the equations, postulates and statements of each scalar science are defined.

Thus T.Πwill not only classify all sciences, but not surprisingly will reveal an enormous number of solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.

 

A complete analysis of languages, we shall attempt in different posts of this web would include the understanding of its spatial, temporal and organic ternary variation, similar to that of cultures. Spatial, mathematical languages dominant in white visual cultures, verbal, temporal languages, dominant in brachycephalic cultures and the organic, vital view of existence, proper of life, black emotional/motor height axis of the brain.

Languages must be then understood in relationship to the senses of human networks to the external Universe. And so this would be a full account of them from a 5D p.o.v.:

  • Mathematical languages.
  • Logic, verbal languages.
  • The 3+3 sensorial languages:
  • The lower senses, smell, taste, touch.
  • The Higher senses. Color languages: the animal syntax
  • Human, mental languages: emotions and thoughts.
  • Art: the human perception of the Game of Existence.
  • The ternary structure of music: Se(bass)<Scales, rhythms & Harmony>Tƒ(Treble)
  • Bidimensional manifolds of information: The art of painting
  • Empty spaces vs. formal membranes: The art of architecture.
  • Compressing the world cycles of human existences (and of lately machines): The art of film.
  • Degrading the human mind: the decadence of all languages in the age of digital thought.

Precisions on the creative process of reality. The non-aristotelian algebra of feed-back causality


In the graph, the back and forth relationship between the infinite single Universe, its infinite partial minds, which become perceptive through a language-mirror, and then in the left its individual ego-centered singularity mirror projecting aback through limited arrows/actions of space-time, the linguistic image re-ordering a partial part of reality: its body and territory
. It is this feedback constant equation what creates reality and so we can also write another Γenerator equation, about the interaction of those three elements that orders each relative fractal partial being/territory of the Universe to the mage and likeness of those languages, images of the whole, they will therefore copycat with slight variations, in the being:

Single, ∞ 5D Universe <≈ Ternary Languages of perception ≈> Spe ‹ST›Tiƒ super organisms.

In the graph, the duality of back and forth order: in the right side, the first flow of information shrinks the Universe through a language into a mapping of the Universe: ø-mind x ∞ Universe = world.

Yet minds are not only mathematical mirrors, as physicists think, because that is the language they use to describe external motions in space, but any language able to mirror through the common Universal syntax:

Subject (still mind) < operandi-action> object (entropic energy of the being)

Then the mind mirror will establish a second process of order (left image: 3->1->2), more subtle, but equally creative, reordering a small part of the physical world, the finite vital territory of the being, making it to its image and likeness, as a vital space in which perform its actions of existence, and survival tending to maintain and reproduce its inner being.

How large and complex is this order, and territory might vary, from what we might call the essential monads, immortal in its simple pure apperception with minimal vital territory to order and construct, and hence far less prone to errors, and longer in its life existence, which are the atoms that seem to live eternally, as they just order a very small ‘territory’; to the largest ordering beings, which are black holes that order whole galaxies, and we shall see in fact also live a relative eternity because from its point of view, its territory, the galaxy is just an atomic world on the ∆+4 scale, and any system does in fact only apperceives an ∆±1 relative space-time around its singularity.

Universal Grammar: ðime§pace generator

i know thoughts of God

Reproduction is what the Universe is all about: re=production of in-form-ation, forms-in-action, motions with form, whose repetitive patterns are the origin of the laws of science. All systems of nature reproduce and those who don’t either internally or externally through catalyzers no longer exist. And that is indeed the purpose of a fractal, mental, linguistic mathematical or natural, organic.

All of them have in fact a feed-back equation, called the generator equation, very simple, which through constant iterations keep reproducing a far more complex form.

So happens to the fractal Universe, whose ‘Fractal Generator’ of Space-time Organisms, is also a simple logic equation with the 11 components of all those super organisms (ab. GST, also the terms we use for General Systems Theory, hence formal and conceptual meanings become fusion), which reflect all the systems of nature, but could be further simplified into 3 simple terms:

$<≈>ð

Whose symbols are the fundamental logic symbols of the non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian, bio-topo-logic, fractal Universe:

$ (moving, lineal limb/potential/territory). <(its expansive locomotion or << its social entropy-death)

(hyperbolic, iterative Ø-body/wave/worker)

> (implosive, informative motion) ð (cyclic particle-head-upper class).

Existential algebra, ab. ¬Æ, studies the STeps of each Ðimotion of space-time, which originate the feed back equation: S≤≥T of steps of space time, that move reality from the ST-Entropy of the Past into the ƒð<<e and through death back into the original steps.

How we move in space-time means how we exist as both things are equated. Steps of motion are always transformations from spatial elements to temporal events back and forth, and so steps that are possible in principle are simply 3:

S> T, T< S , S.=S and T = T. THOSE ARE THE first dimotions and with those four elements we can start to describe across the feed back equation,

S≤≥T

all theSteps of all the dimotions of exist¡ence.

Existence happens as steps of the Fractal Generator in its simplest form: $t≤≥§ð… And for that reason can be sequenced only with 2 poles and 2  inverse operandi and its logic sequencing, =, <>…

Whereas each inverse operandi ±, x/, ∫∂, √x³ represents the inverse§ nature of the states of lineal spacetime, $t and cyclical §ð.

In that regard, the language of all languages is the ilogic language in which the fractal generator of space-time beings is written, a ternary, pentalogic language of a ‘higher logic than that of man’ (Augustine), the most focused mirror able to reflect the syntax of all languages, which will be also mirrors of the ternary Universe of space-time beings.

So all verbal languages have 3 elements, which we can write in terms of ‘spatial information’, ‘temporal energy’ and its infinite space-time reproductive combinations

Spatial Name (Informative mind) < Verb: space-time action> Object (energy of the subject)

Blue (informative color) < green (reproductive color) > Red (energetic color)

F(space function) < Operandi (action of space-time) > G(time function).

And so on…

By defining Dimotions as actions of spacetime STeping between scales, time and space states ternary topologies and so on, we can then reduce reality to a series of steps between the 5 Dimotions and communications between those 5 states: ss, st, tt, ts and its negation.

The multiple forms in which the 3 ‘parts in space’, or ‘ages’ in time of any system are organized between its generation and extinction in lower and upper scales of the fifth dimension becomes then the ‘knots and bolts’ of all details and the laws explored in GST; since it turns out that all systems of space-time are bound by those scalar laws.

3 scales of complexity in languages.

We study the languages of the mind and then concentrate in the 3 ages of evolution of reason in human languages:

  1. I=eye (space language) > wor(l)d (time language) of man which dominated our earlier life, till the industrial revolution overdeveloped…

2. The mathematical digital language of machines, today dominant, but not yet profound enough to describe all forms of nature, and so, bond to evolve as one of the many languages that mirror the universe, which we will evolve redifining its unit, the fractal point:

3. The S@=∆ð language of space-time that is even larger in its syntax as its fractal generator includes all other languages and beings… As it can be used to describe verbal, organic logic, mathematical, digital topologic languages mirrors of its  5D² Space time DIMENSIONS ORIGIN OF ITS Disomorphic qualities, embedded in all systems of reality, which we resume in the ‘Rashomon’ truths of studying for each system its 5 Dimensions of space and time and the properties derived of them.

Languages express the elements of reality and its operandi

It is then clear that what languages as synoptic mirrors of the mind will try to do is to establish the basic relationships between the space, time, scale of the being, expressing its operandi, DEPENDING on the degree of perception the being has of reality and its scales which might be reduced if the being is not fully aware of all the scales of existence, as most minds exist only in a plane of reality, ‘consciously’ of it.

Yet even in the smallest of all realities the being will have at least to perceive ‘organisms’ and ‘worldcycles’ the naked essence of existence, hence at least use two elements, one representing a space-formal state and other representing a motion state, and a system of operandi to relate them or else the being will NOT be able to command a perceptive mapping of reality.

 

Epistemology and Truth: =Dimensional Stiences, theories and minds.

The first obvious question of this post on mind stiences is why mind stiences do not ‘exi=st, that is we do not study mind ‘exist¡ences’, as real beings; as we do with physical biological and social systems and its ∃xistential functions.

Now, it is obvious that stience studies only what ∃xists, ‘functions of existence’. So a huge part of any system is to have a mind which understands the game of existence and allows the system to play it and survive.

Thus what physicists likely would deny we consider a tenant of truth: The UNIVERSE IS FILLED WITH MAXWELLIAN DEMONS ORDERING REALITY.

HOW THEY DO IT? With different ‘intelligences, which however share an evolutionary ‘survival function’ embed in all of them, Œ, the organic function of existence, the strategy of survival we call the LEGO game of the Universe, the Generator game of super organisms.

This is what the Universe does: Superorganisms departing from ∆-1 finitesimal dust of space and time, integrated in time and space through networks which all finally create superoganisms.

The mind is NOT that game though, it is a different less vital thing – a still mapping of reality and algorithms of survival, action-oriented attached to the mapping.

The answer is that present reality is made of actions of entropy and time, which therefore need both to exist, but mind stiences are pure information, and its existence. if real, would form the substrata of all other scales. But in the existence we give it to this sheet of information is provided forcefully by the author’s mind with a minimal bias…So we do NOT talk of mental existences as we talk of astrophysical, biological or sociological systems whose functions of existence are obviously real.

WE MUST REMEMBER THIS: STIENCE IS ONLY CONCERN WITH WHAT EXISTS AND IS REAL (EINSTEIN).

So departing from this law, the function of existence

Γ. ∃xi≈sT

AND ALL its symmetries and generators is the origin seed of information that gives birth when ‘restricted’ by the limits of energy – boundaries of the problem, to a limited number of integral space and time solutions.

The finding of integrals thus means the finding of solutions in the emergence of a larger scale of a function of existence.

How we consider a function? Through its motions of time, which give us functions with often just 3+0 variables, to give us a complete description of such motions. For the simplest informative space-time, that of the Euclidean + time duration 4D holographic Universe humans observe, it is easy to craft a simple bidimensional language to translate its actions:

energy

So with geometry and the analytic geometry and algebra, we can describe the same game we have been describing here in conceptual terms. It follows that the mathematical language will follow in its algebra, just translations to the mathematical language of the main laws and isomorphisms of 5D space-time.

Mind languages are virtually infinitely energetically 0.

Now mind languages are stiences with no existence in the pure realm of static information, as ‘blocks o time’ that will imprint infinitely different herds of social numbers, converting dust of space-time into super organisms.

So they are potentially infinite in games, but in fact zeroes of pure seed of information with no motion, potential lethargic till the right energy informs itself with the seed.

What matters though is did: languages are inflationary potential futures which only exist for a huge range of parallel Universes in which a similar game could be played. Normally thus reality is smaller than the potential stories of the language. Languages of information are inflationary.

Thus Einstein  said to poincare i know when maths are truth (logically consistent) but not when they are real.

In the graph, the syntax of all languages can be reduced to dual and ternary structures that reflect the ternary elements of the fractal generator, Spe<St>Tiƒ. Thus we can consider all languages mirrors of the generator, which in turn species use to order and project its imagination’, reproducing those mirrors through those languages into actions that mold the future of reality. Mind stiences therefore are essential to the way the Universe creates. The graph shows how a minimum of two parameters to represent entropy and information can create a mapping of reality, even though ternary languages are more precise. In the right the human verbal, temporal language and mathematical, spatial one, can be reduced to ternary dimensions (height-information, width-reproduction, length-entropy), ternary topologies, ternary symbols G(spe) <action operandi>T(ƒ) and ternary sentences. Above a simple mathematical statement that relates a spatial function, D, and a temporal one, written BOTH in cyclical 1/ƒ=T and lineal time, below a scheme of the Universal grammar of all systems made of Names (informative element), verbs (actions) and Objects (energy of the Name). Both suffice for a whole mapping of reality.

All what exists is motion, but we can perceive it as still space, as form, thus motion and form is what exists, and yet we cannot distinguish them by the Galilean relativity paradox. Thus we are made of motions, the real part, and forms the imaginary one. And so together we are complex functions of existence, of a formalism, represented by Non-Aristotelian non-Euclidean Non-AE, Non-Æ=i-logic geometry…

What is truth? The maximal information about a being, expressed in a language of the mind with the minimal distortion of the geometric forms in space and causal chains in time of an ST-event.

Now, the Universe is a sum of motions through the 5th dimension, as only when motion exists we need to define a space (the form that moves) and time (motion). And so epistemology is the knowledge about a being of the maximal information about its ST events, which is all, what exists, of truth 1. The language will reduce that truth 1 to a 2-manifold mental mapping of it.

As such truth requires both a proper syntax of reality provided by cyclical time fractal space and the 5th dimension, and a proper semantics of experimental data extracted from reality.

What is then the minimal unit of ‘knowledge’ that allows a language to portrait reality? The answer is duality. Systems can extract the ‘theoretical minimum to survive, from reality and they can do so, if they have a language that can mirror 2 variables, entropy and information.

So you can create a Universe with dual | o, black and white colours, fields of entropy and particles. But better still is to have a ternary language, for which the GENERATOR is the best syntactic model.

Minds and languages.

What languages then matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. For example:

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

red colors (spatial entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (temporal information) for animal visual languages

F(x):time-like parameter < (operandi: action) > G(x): space-like parameter, which defines mathematical equations and its simpler Boolean algebra which in computers reduces all to 0 and | truth or false, ±, and its combined gates.

But language also create the Universe, they not only reflect it, but minds which store languages as identities with beings of reality use them as templates for creation. So mind languages are both mirrors that focus reality and emitters of information, which they enlarge and imprint in reality. It is this dual action-reaction of mind languages, what makes it so beautiful to observe and understand and the core bottom of the artistic languages of the human mind we shall study here (music, painting being the most pure temporal and bidimensional-spatial forms).

Let us then summarise first duality and its languages and then the ternary languages, more sophisticated, proper of modern man, ternary verbal languages and mathematical equations.

EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGES: FROM DUALITY TO TRINITY TO PENTALOGIC

THE FIRST SYNTAX: Duality in the history of knowledge.

In the verbal age of Science, when men used words to describe the Universe, philosophers called the 2 arrows, Yang-Entropy, synonymous of male forms (since men have a lot of Entropy, constantly move, control space and have lineal forms) and yin, related to cyclical time and its patterns of information, which became the female principle (since women are more perceptive, informative, memorial, ordered, made of cyclical curves). Taoists said that yin=form, in/form/ation, which they represented with cycles or fractal lines, – -, and yang=Entropy, which they represented with a continuous line, ___, combine into yin-yang forms, and further on into ternary sets, which they represented with trigrams (I Ching), giving birth to all the possible forms and events of the Universe. In Hinduism the ‘wills of time’ were represented by Shiva, God of death and Entropy vs. Vishnu, God of life and creation.

Duality has always been present in philosophy. Parmenides proved beyond logic fault that from one only one could be created, while 2 could combine themselves into infinite new forms. Heraclites said that 2 elements are necessary to generate by iteration and combination all other forms of the Universe. On the other hand, dialectic philosophers, from Heraclites to Hegel, considered that from a thesis and an antithesis arise all synthetic forms.

– In the modern age, when mankind switched from verbal, temporal languages to mathematical, spatial numbers, in order to describe with higher accuracy the Universe in Space, scientists stressed that formal, geometrical duality of reality. Desargues, a French mathematician, found in the XVII century that all curves and functions could be extracted from the combination of 2 Generator forms, a cycle and a line (that together create a cone, from where those curves, called conics, could be extracted).

The father of Western Science, Descartes, also said that the Universe was ultimately made of ‘res extensa’ (lineal space represented by his Cartesian graph) and vortices of form (charges and masses), similar to time clocks. String Theorists reached the same conclusion in modern science, postulating that all particles are made of lineal and cyclical strings, described by the Beta function. And Einstein in his General Relativity Theory deduced that the Universe was a flat surface of energetic, spatial forces that time curved into cyclical masses, the 2 fractal units of the physical Cosmos. Thus, time and space are geometrical shapes closely related to each other, since cycles of Informative Time bend any plane of Energetic Space, creating the geometrical duality of the physical world. Moreover, those 2 geometries are irreducible to monism, as the ancient problem of squaring the cycle proves.

– In any logic language 2 symbols suffice to represent any being of the Universe. All languages have a syntax based in 2 parameters, one of information and one of relative Entropy that combine through a 3rd active principle, an operandi or verb, that merges them. We talk of a ternary Universal Grammar:

A (Informative subject) <Operandi/verb> B (Entropy/object)

The ternary, Universal grammar applies to all languages able to represent the systems of reality: from the code of colors (red that represents Entropy; blue, the color of information and green, the reproductive color) to verbal languages, where an informative subject relates to an object through an exchange of Entropy and information, described by a verb, shaping the genetic structure of all human languages 8. It also happens in mathematics, where f(x)= g(y) is the universal equation that summarizes all the others.

– Computer Logic is also based in 2 elements: the symbols of the cycle and the line, 0 and |, related by an algorithm. Those digital symbols are not ordered in space as geometric elements, but sequentially, in time, since logic is a time language. Yet they can model any mathematical, spatial relationship, showing the primacy of time over space.

– In Physics, cyclical and lineal movement, gravitational vortices and lineal electromagnetism, cyclical particles and lineal forces, are the only 2 shapes necessary to explain the material Universe. And such duality is irreducible to monism, as the failure of all Unification Theories of forces show.

– If we grow in scale into the biological world, the morphological invariance of both substances is maintained: Time has evolved masses of undifferentiated cells into complex living organisms, which are also made of cyclical heads that store and process Informative Time and lineal limbs of Entropy. Another less pronounced Entropy/information duality is between reproductive body, which absorbs Entropy to reproduce the cycles of the organism and delivers part of it to the limbs and the informative head:

The head is a cyclical, spherical form, and so are the informative senses, all of which accumulate in the head. The head is ‘small’, ‘perceptive’, informative. It sits on top of the body, on the dimension of height. It is ‘broken, discontinuous’ (as it holds more cellular, neuronal parts that the rest of the body’). The head is hierarchical and dominates the body, imposing its directions of future as they guide their body towards Entropy and information fields. The head is still. It is in metaphysical terms, the Aristotelian, unmoved ‘relative God’ that controls the movements of the body.

Its senses also show the same duality: the main informative senses are broken in dual elements (left, right eyes and ears) – while the energetic sense, the mouth that feeds on Entropy is ‘bigger’ and continuous (a single one). The eyes, the most perfect of those senses are in fact a perfect sphere. And they process ‘bidimensional information’ (which latter both eyes mix to create the illusion of 3-dimensionality).

On the other hand the body is a plane, dominant in lineal or elliptic, ‘reproductive’ forms, bigger than the head, on the bottom of the body-head system. The body moves and processes Entropy. It has however hardly any sensorial elements, as it gets the information from the body. Its detached elements, the limbs are even more lineal, and only become broken, discontinuous on the fingers, which are the sub-elements that process information. Within the body, the most lineal elements are those who process directly Entropy: the guts and the lungs (in the brain the cerebellum that controls movement is also a lineal network of neurons that would extend over a meter in length).

Biological dual systems are irreducible to monism, since a headless organism cannot process information and survive. Even in the social, mental scale of existence, men have always represented Entropy with lineal arrows of expansive movement, and time with cyclical clocks of rotating, imploding movement. Thus in our plane of space/time, we find 2 invariant elements, formally homologous to the energetic line/movement and the cyclical, temporal rotating forms we have found in all other scales.

– Finally, in Economics, machines and lineal weapons of metal that release Entropy are valued by cyclical bits of metal-information (money), ‘the brain of the economy’, through prices, in a dual, physical and financial economic structure so far irreducible to monism, as the failure of planned economies proved. And when we consider Entropy and information – machines that men create to enhance their own Entropy and information capacities – they maintain the invariant forms of Entropy and information: spherical cameras are informative, and energetic, moving machines are lineal planes.

Thus, the only logic able to explain all forms and species of the Universe is a self-generating dualism, caused by the existence of 2 fundamental invariant, geometrical shapes of Entropy and information that repeat and emerge in every scale of space/time of the Universe – the lineal wave of Entropy or shortest movement between 2 points and the cycle, rotating spin or sphere, which stores the maximal volume of information in a minimal volume. They are the most perfect, inverse shapes of Entropy and information, which repeat in all the species of the Universe:

– All systems that create inner form, information, from DNA nuclei to eyes to brains have similar cyclical or spherical forms because a sphere stores the maximal amount of information in minimal space. And their function is creative, in/form/ative.

– On the other hand, all moving bodies that process Entropy are lineal, because a line is the fastest, shortest distance between 2 points. So fast felines, F1 cars, light beams and rockets are all lineal in form. Further on, the function of systems that absorb Entropy is often destructive: for example, felines are predators that erase the information of its preys and missiles are weapons that erase human beings.

– While in any scale of reality, complex, ‘organic systems’ combine both forms into TI=k=Se balanced systems. So the 2 commonest forms of Natural fractals are the tree, with an informative head sitting on top of a line/limb of Entropy and/or reproductive cycle (from virus to sperm, from humans to plants, from robots to missiles); and the spiral, which can easily mutate between a cyclical state, coiling onto itself and a lineal, moving state, as an uncoiled snake (from particles that become waves, to worms, to galaxies that mutate from bars into spirals). Dual organic systems are everywhere: informative particles and fields of Entropy create physical beings, while all biologic species are made with reproductive bodies and informative heads.

Recap: The 2 simplest arrows of time, creation of Entropy and information have opposite properties: From a logic perspective, Entropy and information have a paradoxical, dual, causality: E<=>I, which means to create one we must destroy the other. Thus all events are dual: a creation means a parallel destruction event.

Duality & Complexity: Simple and Complex Time arrows

The best-known science to come out of that congress was cybernetics in which computer science is based, because of the practical uses it has today in the age of information. Yet the most important sciences for pure knowledge were two less-known disciplines, Duality and Complexity:

– Duality studies the Universe with the 2 ‘simplex’ arrows of time, Entropy and in/form/ation16.

Scientific Duality has important precedents in Eastern cultures. In Taoism yin translates as information and yang as Entropy, and the Universe is explained with those 2 elements. In Europe Leibniz introduced Taoism to the West, establishing it as the foundation of German philosophy. There, Hegel translated philosophically Duality into Dialectics – the concept that from a thesis (the equivalent of Entropy) and an antithesis (the equivalent of information, with inverse properties to those of Entropy) a synthesis arises, by merging both in ‘Complementary, dual systems’.

So even if Duality was not understood scientifically till Systems Sciences filled it with scientific data, it has been always a ‘Theory of It All’, in the tradition of religions and philosophy. This is logic – since humans have understood Duality with different degrees of detail and different jargons by the mere fact that they observe a dualist Universe.

What modern Duality has done is to upgrade those concepts with the discoveries of mathematical, biological and physical isomorphisms, which show the Universe as a Fractal System of Entropy and information. In that regard, the central concept of modern duality is also the Principle of Complementarity, which states that all systems in the Universe are constructed with an energetic and informative element, whose geometrical properties and functions are self-similar:

Energetic systems store Entropy and move. They occupy more space and are lineal (the shortest distance between two points)

Informative systems store and gauge information. Thus they occupy less space and tend to be cyclical (the form that stores more information per unit of volume).

This dual complementarity is the main Law of quantum physics (principle of complementarity between a lineal field of Entropy and a cyclical, particle of Information). It is the principle that explains the structure of all living organisms (from animals with cyclical heads and lineal limbs; to plants with energetic trunks and planar leaves, which store and process Entropy, and quantized, fractal roots that absorb chemical information; to cells with a central nucleus that stores the DNA/RNA information of the system). It explains biological reproduction (since males have lineal limbs, specialized in the collection of Entropy and females, with curved bodies, reproduce our information). It is the principle of Computer science, based in the duality of symbols, 0 and |.

The Universe has two inverse ways of creating reality: it creates either Entropy by erasing form, as when a quasar explodes, E=Mc2, expelling ‘dark Entropy’ and flows of expansive space; or when any being dies, dissolving its form.

Or it creates information by warping Entropy, as when Entropy becomes mass, M=E/c2 (in fact the first equation that Einstein found), since ‘Time bends (vacuum) space into mass’ (Einstein) or ‘Time evolves the form of beings’ (Darwin). And so all what exists fluctuates between the arrow of information, of life, of creation of particles with form, E->I, and the arrow of death, of erasing of form into Entropy, of big-bangs, I->E.

Both together, in their transformations, E<=>I, generate the cycles of creation of form (life cycles) and destruction (death cycles), which define the existence of its parts.

Thus Duality advances a step further in the great insights of Eastern and German Philosophy, opening new avenues of thought and explaining the why of many phenomena that the use of the single arrow of quantum physics cannot resolve.

– But Duality only studies simultaneously the Entropy and form of what we call a ‘plane of existence’, or ‘scale of the fractal Universe’ (Religious/philosophical vs. mathematical jargons). And when we consider reality, it is obvious that the Universe is structured in ‘layers’ of entities of growing size and complexity – from particles to atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planetary systems and galaxies.

In each of those layers we find Dual species: quarks of massive information and electrons of energetic space, which form atoms; Nitrogen rings that store information and phosphate chains, which form DNA molecules; Nuclei that store information and cellular bodies that store Entropy; heads of information and bodies of Entropy; audiovisual networks of information and economic networks that distribute Entropy, forming together nations. And this pattern of social evolution and emergence into new, more complex systems that create a bigger plane of existence also occurs in physical space, as molecules become planets and stars that organize themselves into galaxies.

So we must add to the 2 Simple arrows of time, Entropy and information, 2 Complex arrows of time: the creation of self-similar species or reproduction and the social organization of those self-similar, cellular species into networks and more complex systems.

And we find those 2 universal arrows in both, physical and biological systems. Even the simplest particles of the Universe, quarks and electrons reproduce into new quarks and electrons when they absorb Entropy, as biological beings do, and organize themselves into complex cellular systems in atoms that have many quarks and electrons. In that regard, Complexity studies how reality is created by multiple layers of reality, which from the simplest strings and particles evolve into molecules, cells, organisms, planets, stars and galaxies of increasing size and complexity.

So the arrows of Entropy and form are not enough to understand the complex Universe, which exists through a series of ‘planes of increasing complexity and self-organization’, starting from the first theoretical duality of ‘lineal strings and cyclical strings’, till arriving to the final duality of black holes of gravitational information and stars of electromagnetic Entropy (Galactic duality).

Such networks gather an enormous number of individual Entropy and information cycles/cells of space-time into a single whole or social organism deployed across multiple planes of space-time. The study of those scalar, network structures is the field of Complexity Theory, the sub discipline of System Sciences, which departing from Duality, analyzes how lines and cycles of Entropy and information reproduce, evolve, self-organize and emerge as a bigger system, in a ‘higher’, ever more complex space -time plane, creating in this manner complex systems, made of simpler, ‘cellular parts’.

Thus Systems sciences require a second discipline, besides Duality, to study complex systems and their self-organization thanks to the arrows of reproduction and social evolution, which create networks of Entropy and information that become wholes, units themselves of a new plane of existence:

System sciences: Duality (analyzes how the beats of Entropy & information, E<=>I, create the future) +

Complexity (studies how complex, reproductive, exo & eusocial S exo, events create the future).

Thus Complexity studies the 2 ‘complex’ arrows of time, derived from the combinations of Entropy and form, exI, or ‘reproduction’, which creates self-similar ‘cellular beings’ in a given plane or scale of reality and ‘social evolution’, which creates complex, tight networks made of those reproduced exo parts, that become together a single unit of a new, higher, bigger, more complex plane of existence.

Those 2 ‘complex’ arrows of time derived from the Simplex ones (Entropy and form), create the 4 ‘dimensions’ or ‘arrows’ of time needed to explain the Universe, and its understanding through the formalism of the Generator Equation of Multiple Spaces-Times, SE xti, represents an enormous leap for all sciences, which prior to the Systemic Paradigm worked only with the arrow of entropy and Entropy proper of XIX century physics.

We ad now to that ‘arrow of Entropy’, the ‘canvas’, the paint – the information in which that Entropy transforms itself, and the painter, since we contend that the finality of the Universe, the ultimate arrow of ‘future time’ is the creation of social organisms through the use of a common language of information – hence the creation of history, the superorganism of mankind, the most complex form of the Universe. We prove all this with the experimental method and the logic and mathematical formalisms derived from the generator equation, , whose symbols define the 4 main arrows of time:

e or Se, which is the symbol of spatial Entropy, the Entropy-motion, which is stored in vacuum space, from where all ‘forms’ of information are created.

I or Ti, temporal information, which is the dominant arrow of future, as time bends Entropy, trans/forming it into particles and ‘forms’ of information.

E x i is the formalism of reproduction. Since all systems reproduce their reproductive bodies/fields and informative particles/heads and the networks, X, that relate both systems.

Se x Ti describes the Social evolution of self-similar cells, into herds and organisms.

Thus the Generator Equation formalizes the main cycles, isomorphisms and events generated by the principle, ‘Entropy never dies but transforms itself into information’, which applies to any form or motion, in any scale of reality. Since the generator equation of the fractal Universe is just a complex expansion of the main equation of classic science, ‘Entropy never dies but transforms itself’, to include information. Yet when those arrows of time develop all its ‘repetitions’, feed-back iterations and combinations, as it does a simple fractal generator, like the Mandelbrot fractal, all the possible cyclical events/forms of transformation of Entropy into information appear in the Universe. In that sense, the study of the generator, fractal equation of the Universe could be to XXI century science, what the study of the final equation of Entropy, the arrow of time studied by physicists, E=Mc2, was to XX century science. Yet instead of generating pure Entropy as the equation of entropy has done, the fractal generator creates life, which makes its study much more rewarding for mankind, – a life form.

Recap: A true Theory of Unification, as systems science is, should explain all what exists, including humans – why we are here, our role in the Universe, what truly matters to mankind. This is what System sciences do by using the 4 main arrows of time. Since all Space-time beings are causal networks of cyclical time knots, created by multiple chains of organic, e<=>i cycles, and its complex combinations, reproduction and social evolution, where each ‘time arrow event’ becomes a flow of Entropy and information that converges into the space-time of the knot. Those knots can be formalized with cyclical, fractal space-time parameters in terms of frequencies and dimensions.

Such perception of the World through Time Arrows was natural to Eastern philosophy. System Sciences and its 2 main disciplines, Duality and complexity study those Time Arrows with the scientific method.

Entropy and information arrows: transfer of motion and form between place of cyclical existence.

We mean by entropy, motion transferred between planes, thus Entropy is spatial transfer between i-scales; that is, displacement in space caused by another i-plane, usually a force of the larger S-planes of existence.

When we see those motions together, ∑E=S, we observe the space-vacuum of the Universe.

The sum of all motions, simplified by the eye-mind as a continuous, static extension creates our perception of space.

And we mean by information, dimensional, cyclical form, when transferred also from different scales, from the particle of an i+n plane to the i+n-1 plane of force.

For example, when an electron emits a form and the form imprints and reproduces along the lower plane of forces, information is reproduced.

Reproduction of forma and information are thus similar concepts.

Further on, form is often the sum in time or in space of multiple time cycles. Thus the 3 concepts, form, time and information are intimately related, and we will go deeper in those concepts as we go deeper in details of iST. Enough to say that we represent To and Se, as Temporal information, and Spatial energy, to simplify and widen our analysis of isomorphic laws that apply to the 3 concepts: Space=motion (static, moving perception) ≈ energy (similar but not equal since energy transfers between scales) and we write To, to signify Time cycles = Form (moving, cyclical perception) ≈ (similar to) Information.

The key to understand energy and information is precisely the understanding of how two similar forms communicate energy and information between them by ’emitting’ usually a wave or particle of a lower scale, i-1 (spatial cardinal scale), where it will move and be absorbed by another similar particle evolving the i-1 system into a collapsed cell of the i-particle that receives the communication.

Thus for example:

i-Fermion < i-1 Boson with energy and information > i-Fermion

Is the fundamental equation of quantum physics which implies a transfer of energy and information between two i-fermions by means of a boson of a lower scale, which will collapse when reaching the i-fermion.

In our mechanical scale, we do produce Energy which is stored in a larger, formal system. And the system is destroyed and lowered in scale:

In the case of E=Mc2, the energy stored in the i+n mass becomes radiation, lowering its scale. In most systems, energy is released by the ‘destruction’ of the system that stores it back into lower scales of organisation, as an entropic, death process.

In most of those cases, then energy, is upgraded of scale, as it becomes ‘momentum’, which is its ‘derivative’ respect to speed, 1/mv²∂v=mv= momentum which is transferred back to the other system as motion.

And this connects with other fundamental themes of iST: the understanding of fundamental operandi of mathematics such as derivatives which is normally an emergence of an STi-1 scale upwards, to an scale with lesser form and more motion. As in the 3 derivatives of ‘space’ (form) into speed (motion) into acceleration (maximal motion) and viceversa, the integration of motion-energy into form.

All those fascinating relationships between mathematical operandi, classic magnitudes of science and the laws of i-planes of cyclical time, are the ultimate whys of the Universe, and bring us back again to our narrative of Leibniz, the discover of calculus.

What is information? The inverse of energy, in as much as it is a process that transfers mostly form, and so tends to upgrade from scales, as when genes imprint a human being of the upper scale, even if often the procedure of transfer of energy and information in combined waves is the same. Yet when information is transferred, the wave does loose energy but maintains the information without change, and we can classify waves by their different carrying of energy and information.

Further on, form is not perceived, time cycles do NOT communicate unless a reproductive wave of information appears. Hence the 3 concepts are intimately related.

Now, what we call absolute form or absolute time are the sum of all the cycles of time and informations of the Universe.

And this sum of all cyclical forms-in-action, in-form-ations, which our mind perceives as cycles of clock-time, creates relational, ‘fractal’ time, also defined first by Leibniz, one of the fathers of the 4th paradigm. Energy without motion or form without energy is not perceivable. Thus, systems to exist need a minimal quantity of both or they cease to exist – they die. Or as Taoist, the closest, classic philosophy to this book put it: ‘All yin-information has a drop of yang-Energy; all Yang has a drop of yin’.

Further on, because all systems respond to the same laws, we can recognize the shapes of a network dominant in energy by its form that will be lineal, planar, extended in space, as the line is the shortest distance between two points; hence the shape with more motion. And we can recognize the shapes of information because they are smaller in space, broken and cyclical, as the cycle or sphere is the shape that stores more form in lesser space; hence the perfect form of information.

So DNA nuclei, particles, heads and coins of money, made of gold, the best informative atom of the Universe, are cyclical and small. While fields of forces, moving bodies and weapons, made of iron, the most energetic atom of the Universe, are lineal and big. Finally, real physical, biological and mechanical systems are those who transform back and forth energy and information, between their two poles: E<=>O.

It follows also that cyclical information, frequency and time cycles are related. On the other side, expansive energy, motion and space, which stores energy in the vacuum are also related. So energy is fractal space and information fractal time – facts that will allow to fusion the jargon of many sciences in this volume of the series dedicated to the detailed description of physical systems and the 3rd volume dedicated to biological and sociological systems (the superorganisms of history and economics).

Thus the blog analyses the ‘3’ BUILDING STRUCTURE OF REALITY’, Space, Time and Planes of existence.

Since reality STARTS as SIMPLE SPACE, WHICH BECOME CYCLES OF TIMES (lineal strings and cyclical strings of time in the lowest possible scale) and then grows in complexity through i-planes of scientific species, guided by the metrics of the 5th dimension, which can be seen in structural terms, in fixed space as i±4=SxT or in dynamic terms, in terms of the actions of its organisms that try to maximise its existence, increasing its energy its information, reproducing and evolving socially, ∆SeXTo.

And so guided by those laws systems grow into Societies and super organisms, through the planes of the Universe, all of them following 3 sets of laws derived from those metrics, and its dimensional elements, space time and planes of existence: The isomorphism of its topological spatial organic parts, its time ages and its actions across those multiple planes.

To do though a better detailed analysis of those planes, we subdivide the 3 main isomorphisms of spatial topologies time ages and plane actions in 11 isomorphisms. And then study with them all the planes of reality, from Forces to Atoms and Molecules (which form the first ‘super organism’, the atom), through states of matter, geological formations and celestial bodies (which form the 2nd super organism, a cosmic body), through stars, galaxies and Universes, (which form the 3rd fundamental super organism of physical matter, the galaxy), and its ‘biological varieties.

This simplified graphic expression of the 5th dimension has the advantage of allowing an easier understanding of the ‘Whole Universe’ which is the super organism of all partial beings, hence with an absolute time duration and an infinite number of scales of size and hierarchical organization, whereas the ‘informative head’ is the Logic of General Systems theory – those aforementioned thoughts of God, and the ‘Body’ all its partial systems through all the scales, each one studied by a different science:

We have called the sum of all those isomorphic planes of space-time in the 5th dimension.

Since science calls the ‘4th dimension’ of time, the arrow of entropy and locomotion, so we respect that, though arguably it would be better to order the 5 dimotions by chronological order…

Further on, as science compacts the past and future cycles of beings, by extending present time along a lineal coordinates of infinite time duration, we have also extended the 5th dimension or i-scale by extending it up and down, through the metrics of scalar space-time, to encompass all the i-scales of the Universe.

This simpler analysis gave us the opportunity to study the metrics of al the world-planes of the Universe, ∆=Es x Ti, and learn a lot of general properties of scalar space-time. But the analysis of only a 4th and 5th dimension of time and isomorphic scales is limited and of little use when we analyze an specific ‘variety’ or ‘species’ of scalar space-time in detail.

The 5th dimension is a ‘compact’ version of the infinite planes of space time of the Universe, which uses the 3 ‘spatial dimensions’ and the compact dimension of Time Duration of Einstein (4th classic dimension) and the adds a compact of all the i-scales in the Universe, in a ‘fifth dimension’ of scalar depth.

In that sense the 5th dimension is the sum of all the planes of ‘social evolution’ from past to future in the Universe.

And this metrics allow travel through the scale of the 5th dimension. So thanks to those metrics species from different scales can relate to each other and transfer energy and information among them: S entropy<energy x information>Tƒorm.

And so the Universe can synchronize the species of its different scales.

Those simple examples of several different fields of inquire within the frame of the 5th dimension metrics, shows the enormous richness and capacity to resolve the ‘whys’ of all type of universal phenomena, and explain the ‘isomorphisms’ (equal laws) of all type of entities made of fractal, vital space with motions and energy and cyclical, fractal time clocks with information, of 5th dimensional metric.

Some key partial equations of Existential Algebra.

If we call the metric of the 5th dimension in philosophical terms, the ‘Function of Existence’, and write it as E x I = St (energy and information, using in this case i for information, instead of the customary o for form, equals a constant plane of space-time) we can call the study of that equation and its different variations and partial equations, ‘Existential algebra’, which becomes the mathematical foundations of an organic philosophy of the Universe, where all the previously ill-defined concepts, from the equation of the soul, to the concept of life and death, survival and extinction, can be logically and mathematically represented.

For example, one of the more difficult concepts is that of anthropomorphic Gods of eusocial love, which code in verbal thought, the laws of eusocial evolution which allow different cells=believers of a human religion, to act together and shape a community.

Thus immediately we realize that such gods can be represented with a simple equation:

Max. ∆+1. Where ∑i-ndividual human beings =ST+1, the plane of social existence or superorganism of a civilization. And within that plane or God, there will be a prophet or Max. ∆, which will receive the ‘saint spirit’, that is, the verbal coding or message of eusocial love, the DNA common to all believers that will put them together.

That is called in mystical terms the mystery of the Saint Trinity, or the act of revelation of a prophet. And so an anthropomorphic god is the subconscious collective plane of existence of mankind the super organism of human beings, expressed in the informative collective verbal language, through a common memetic code.

Those simple equations thus have much more meaning that one could ever imagine. And so the purpose of this section is to study ‘mathematically’, with algebraic equations, derived from the ‘fractal generator’ of the 5th dimension and all its world-plane of existence – the previous equation of the metrics of world-planes of space-time, and deduce from it, the general laws that apply to all sciences, forms of art, perception and religion of all the species of the universe – a task further accomplished in its details – that is, in its empirical proofs, in each of the analysis of the species of the 10 planes of existence of the universe perceived by mankind.

Conservation of momentum and dominance of information over entropy.

Now it follows from all what has been said that systems have an arrow of information and future, as energy become informed, systematically warped into a 3rd age of life. So in physical systems Einstein said that time curves the energy of space into masses, and we see all systems wrinkling with age. This is due to the fact that informative systems are ‘faster’ than slower body systems, and so the rat wins the dinosaur, the chip the machine, man the lion and the black hole devours the star. And this exhaustion of energy by the infinite fractal mind-points of information is balanced by the arrow of death or big-bang when all energy is exhausted.

As Se and To are ultimately motions, and since motion is the ultimate substance of reality, of the two types, cyclical motions (from accelerated vortices of mass, to clock times, to rotary inertia) and ‘—motions’ (from speed to acceleration, from limbs to fields), but the total angular and lineal momentum of the Universe is conserved in each of those i=ST planes of existence, it follows that life must be continued by death and explosion of energy into information.

Thus we can rewrite the principle of energy and information conservation as:

Energy and information transform each other ad eternal within 3 relative st=∆±1 plane of existence, through world cycles of life and death for all species of the Universe.

This enlarge the laws of classic sciences and explains unexplained phenomena such as beta decay, where a neutrino, a particle of the relative i-1 gravitational plane of existence of particles (hence invisible to our direct perception), ‘steals’ parts of the momentum of the particle of the i-2 atomic scale as a neutron decays. Many phenomena of quantum physics and relativity will find in that sense a better explanation when we deal with the concept of 3 planes of physical existence, the relative ∆±2 human planes of ‘matter’ where ‘mechanics’ rule, and the ∆±4 cosmic plane of gravitation and the ∆±3 planes of quantum, electromagnetic phenomena. Here we see the relativism of those planes, as mechanical, matter planes include all the life planes, which due to the higher perception of humans, close to its ‘i-self’, are further differentiated, but from the larger ‘space scale’ of the galactic physical world are irrelevant, all submitted to the action of ‘molecular matter’

Now this introduction to conservation principles is needed to consider what all systems try to achieve, to avoid death; to maintain the equation of existence in a steady state, without absorbing too much information and depleting the body-limbs of its energy, by maintaining the balance of the existential force in the point Se=Ti, ‘cheating’ with that balance the metrics of the 5th dimension, which inexorably drag the system to its old age and death reversal as motion cannot stop.

Thus systems try to convert that motion into a long lasting ‘vibration’, back and forth from future to past, into a steady present, a fascinating phenomena with infinite variations, from the long lasting back and forth vibrating AC current vs. forward DC current that looses intensity (the existential force of the currency, measure by the charge, To parameter and volume, Se), to the motions of sexual reproduction, back and forth, penis in and out (-; which reproduces a parallel clone or present form of the i-system, to the understanding of sensation, of the infinite orgasms of the Universe, as motion is associated to sensation, which we consider one of the natural properties of the two motions of reality. there is thus a program of existence, derived of the search for immortality of all species, which try to stop the metrics of the 5th dimension in its balanced point.

The equation of beauty, survival, balance, adulthood, reproduction and love.

In that regard of the many isomorphic ways to write the metrics of the 5th dimension two are of great importance.

The equation of survival of the strongest, which translates Darwinian evolution:

Max. Se x Ti->Se=Ti.

Where the species with maximal energy and Information becomes the top predator (the species with more momentum, V(s) x M(i), with stronger bodies and more intelligent minds). And this is achieved precisely when both systems, body and mind are in balance: Se=To (maximal product of a total quantity i, divided in two e x i happens when e=i).

As it defines a general mandate for all beings: to find a homeostasis or balance between their Spatial motions and energy components and its informative clocks of time, its body and mind (golden mean rule of Buddhism, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, homeostasis, steady state, balanced perception of beauty, adult age of the 3 age of life of longest duration).

Thus a tug of war takes place in existence between the metrics of the 5th dimension that allows travel through the arrow of constant growth of information, E->Ti

It is for that reason that we perceive the balance as beauty, (mind subconscious perception of the equation) that we enjoy reproduction as pleasure (body perception), that we like to move at a steady state speed that calms us vs. the anxiety of acceleration and the depressive mood of deceleration (the 3 ‘ages of a motion’, which first accelerates in its energetic youth, then keeps an inertial speed and then decelerates).

Actions of ‘motions’ and time

5D best

ENERGY INFORMATION

The Universe is made of 2 substances: spatial ‘Ðimotions’ and informative time. We can see it with motion as ‘Ðimotions’ and time or as fixed forms, as space and information. We can see it as a single reality, as space and time, or as a multiple quanta, as ‘Ðimotions’ and information. We can differentiate them by form, as space and ‘Ðimotions’ are lineal or planar surfaces and time and information are cyclical. And we can see it together into beings, the simplest of which is an action of light, SxT=k. This duality structures all beings of reality. So we are made of cyclical heads and lineal bodies. Weapons are lines that release ‘Ðimotions’. Informative machines are cyclical, and all physical systems are made of lineal forces and cyclical particles of information.                

The Principles of reality: Space-time Duality. Ternary organs and ages. 4 åctions. ∞ Fractal Universes.

The integration of all sciences in one is the goal of General Systems Sciences or Complexity. At Macy’s the year of Einstein’s death, the highest minds of mankind came together and realized that physics had its limits and lacked despite its exhaustive understanding of ‘Ðimotions’ and motion (as that was its purpose since its inception by Galileo) a full comprehension of information, the other element of which the simplest Universe is made.

They also realized that the mechanist view was too simple and rather theological because as Leibniz put it, needed a God that started and created the mechanism. So for the future evolution of a more comprehensive theory, they considered that all the ‘systems’ of the Universe (anything that exists), there should be at least two elements, defined by their form and function, both related to each other: ‘Ðimotions’ or ‘Ðimotions’ or space (any expansive motion, hence perceived as extended, planar or lineal space) and information or form or time (implosive motion, hence perceived as implosive, cyclical motion). This realization is the principle in which the 5 dimensions of the Universe are based. Since we can say as Taoists philosophers that from ‘1 comes 2, from 2 comes 3’ and add ‘from 3 comes 4, from 4 comes 5 and from 5 dimensions come all the beings of the Universe’:

  • Duality: The space-time of the Universe is made of quantum of 2 types of motions: Lineal ‘Ðimotions’ and cycles of times, whose frequency carries the information of the universe. As proved by Planck: ∑ Sp X Tƒ =K
  • Trinity: All organic systems have a head made of cycles of times, limbs of quantum energies, combined in a body that reproduces both making this logic structure of motions to survive.
  • 5-Dimensionality: Such organisms survive by performing 5 åctions. ‘Ðimotions’ feeding, informative perception, reproduction and social evolution as herds, ∑ and networks, ∑2=∏.
  • The orgasm mandate: Each mathematical point of view, or diffeomorphic, local entity of space-time will perceive reality from its own point of view and try to maximize its existence as a complementary system, ∑Sp X Tƒ=k, this is achieved at points S=T and max. ∑.
  • The meaning of existence. Thus all systems try to achieve Max. ∑Sp X Tƒ=k. We call this the mandate of existence: grow in spatial ‘Ðimotions’ and temporal information: ‘Grow and multiply… in balance between mind and body.’

What this meant is that all what you see is made of two type of realities |-Motion or ‘Ðimotions’ and cyclical motion with more form or information. If you look at yourself, you head is spherical, cyclical. Your limbs are lineal and move. And in between you have a body that combines both forms and it is elliptic or an inverted cone, figures made of combining line and cycles.

Anywhere you look you will find all systems to have those 2 elements, ‘Ðimotions’ limbs or fields in physics and cyclical heads or particles. So this is the first tenant of General Systems sciences, which describes the common isomorphisms of all systems of the Universe:

All what exists is a system made of 3 components, a field of motion, the energetic system, a head or particle that process and creates forms, the system of information.

In complexity the Universe is quantic. Space-time continuum is the sum of all those spaces or motions of ‘Ðimotions’, of all the limbs and fields of ‘Ðimotions’ of lineal or planar form. And time is the sum of all those cyclical motions or ‘clocks’ of all its systems.

There is not only a clock of time, our mechanical clocks, but infinite cyclical motions that happen to regulate and guide the energetic fields. So particles guide fields of ‘Ðimotions’, and heads guide limbs of ‘Ðimotions’.

This is the first ‘whole’ and its parts: a Universe of space and time is the whole. Its parts are all those quantic, lineal fields of ‘Ðimotions’ and limbs and all those cyclical particles (charges, masses) and heads. The whole seems continuous and static because we integrate it in the mind’s picture. The parts seem broken and vital in motion. Both descriptions are valid. And the whole interacts with the parts.

For example, Relativity explains the whole. Quantum theory the parts, fields of ‘Ðimotions’ and particles. And the whole and its isomorphisms influence its parts.

Organisms seem wholes, but then they are made of cells, of two types, informative brain neurons and somatic, body cells. And the whole influences its parts.

Time and space are like Leibniz – the most clear predecessor of organicism – thought of them: a sum of different ‘spaces and times’ as each entity that exists has a certain vital space or body of ‘Ðimotions’ that lasts a certain duration of time or life. This brings a key duality, between Universal, ‘whole’ concepts (space and time) and particular parts (the energies and cycles of information of each part):

If space has motion and it is broken in vital spaces with extension, it is equivalent to a sum of energies. Thus space is made of ∑energies.

And if time is broken in multiple life cycles, and we consider each life cycle or duration of a complementary system a clock cycle of time, time is equivalent to all the cyclical forms or ‘in/form/ ations’ of the Universe. So time is the sum of all informations, all forms-in-action, all cyclical forms.

When we add all the informative cycles of all beings and all its ‘vital energies’, we obtain absolute time and space, which ultimately is an error of perception due to the use of a single mechanical clock.

Yet when we perceive, we also eliminate motion. And so we see space quiet, as we see the Earth quiet, despite moving along paths of gravitational ‘Ðimotions’; or your skin quiet despite being made of cellular cycles. Thus we further reduce our knowledge of the parts gathered in a whole that appears as quiet space, with a few motions that truly matter to the perceiver – of preys, predators and individuals of the same species – while the rest of reality appears as a continuous space-time, often represented in a continuous Cartesian, mathematical graph. This is natural to the limits of storage of information of any perceiver, because the brain cannot hold all the fractal motions, vital spaces, time durations of the life of all beings. So it reduces information. But this has caused grave errors in human knowledge, as we believe what we see. So science tends to reductionism, considering beings things and ignoring the isomorphisms that relate all those scales.

SO HAPPENS WITH the duality of transformations of entropy into form, and its milder version in a single plane – energy into information.

The constant transformation of one into another is thus the new fundamental law of science:

‘All entropic energy trans/forms constantly back and forth into in-form-ation, $t<=>ðƒ’

Thus the Universe is truly an eternal infinite of beats of ‘ðimotions’ warping into dimensional form, information and informations uncoiling into spatial ‘Ðimotions’. And since both elements ‘Ðimotions’ and temporal information have motion this is possible as they are truly just the two extreme types of topological motions of the Universe, each one associated to a series of ‘functions’ and ‘perceptions’:

‘Ðimotions’=Extension=Space= Fast motion = Lineal, planar shapes = Pleasure = Reproduction = Death

Information=Implosion=Time=Slow motion=Cyclical ball=Pain =Communication = Evolution = Life

The infinite balances and combinations of those two fields and its forms are the essence of reality.

The five åctions of ‘Ðimotions’ and time performed by all species.

Since all is space-time, all is ‘Ðimotions’ and information; all is a sum of complementary entities of ‘Ðimotions’ and information that perform 4 åctions in space-time to enhance its survival:

-’Ðimotions’ feeding (e), information or perception of it (ï), reproduction that combines both in other surface of space-time (Sp X Tƒ) and finally social evolution, as a herd, ∑Sp X Tƒ, or as a network, ∑2=∏, which as the reader can see summons up all the other arrows.

We call the composite, reproductive and evolutionary arrows, the complex arrows.

And so we can express all in the synoptic language of science with a simple equation that we call the fractal generator of the Space-time Universe: ∑Sp X Tƒ

Since e and O are the two initial variables of reality, the program is self-evident, deduced from them and it proves itself by the experimental method (all is a complementary system of ‘Ðimotions’ and information) and then by the logic of evolution: those 4 space-time arrows encompass and explain all what exists in space-time, and all åctions and isomorphisms of all sciences, as the are needed to survive.

Some of those sciences need some minor corrections to adapt it to the program, but most don’t; just a translation of jargons. Because of the importance of it, I believe it will start a new paradigm of science, the paradigm of ‘whys’, that would deepen the understanding of the ‘hows’ of the present age of knowledge, based in metric measure.

We shall prove that all systems are complementary systems of ‘Ðimotions’ (æ) and information (ï), which combine both to perform ‘åctions’ in space-time (Sp X Tƒ); most of them tending to absorb further ‘Ðimotions’ (∆Sp) and information (∆) or ‘combine’ both in new ‘åctions’ and reproductive processes (Sp X Tƒ).

We call the 2 components of all systems (Sp and Tƒ) the simplex, primary åctions-arrows of space-time, following the tradition of physical sciences; where action is their perception in space and arrow their perception in time. They are equivalent to the concept of the simplex ‘biological drives’ in biological sciences (feeding and perceiving ‘Ðimotions’ and information); and the concept of ‘will’ or ‘greed’ – our desire for more ‘Ðimotions’ and information, in psychology.

And we call the combination of those two primary åctions/arrows/drives/wills of ‘existence’ in space and time, the complex, secondary åctions/arrows: reproducing (Sp X Tƒ) and evolving socially, when we consider a sum of those åctions/arrows either in space or in time, ∑Sp X Tƒ (spatial analysis) or ∑ Sp <=>∏ Tƒ.

The reader will observe that since we are referring to self-similar åctions/arrows/drives/wills in all scales, we need a supra-jargon and formalism to unify them all, or else we would have to make such chains of similar concepts in each scale:

– We prefer the term reproduction to its different jargons: ‘iteration’ in mathematics, ‘decoupling’ in physics, ‘reproduction’ in biology, ‘memetic creation’ in culture, and ‘production’ in economics. And we prefer the terms ‘Ðimotions’ instead of space and information instead of time cycles.

– We prefer the terms existence and extinction to the terms life and death; as they are inclusive of all entities of reality.

– We most often use the term åctions or time arrows instead of biological drives or will of existence. In that sense, we reduce space-time åctions to the concept of time arrows as space is just a slice of the flow of cyclical time arrows that displace and change the spatial configuration of all the beings of the Universe – defined as the sum of all the cycles of time arrows of all its existential beings. Hence time includes space within it and such concept stresses a fundamental property of the Universe: all has motion and form, ‘Ðimotions’ and in/form/ation.

Some key discoveries of General Systems will be difficult to overcome by mainstream science, specially physics, the oldest of all sciences and hence more prone to old errors of ‘Idols of the tribe of knowledge’ (Bacon), due to the ‘memetic=believer’ nature of the human brain, which as any system of information, reproduces its bits (genes and memes =theories), generation upon generation, regardless of its logic and experimental consistence (content of truth). The main error of classic physics concerns the nature of time as ‘what a clock measures’ (Einstein), and hence as a single time-arrow of motion.

When time is any type of change and so we must define 4 arrows/åctions of space-time as the fundamental types of change of all systems. Of those 4 ‘type of universal åctions’; physics acknowledges only an arrow of time, ‘Ðimotions’, the arrow of ‘Ðimotions’ and motion, which is what it studies since Galileo’s analysis of the motion of weapons, and a type of clock, the mechanism constructed by him. This was all right, as long as Physics did not pretend to be the philosophy of science of all other sciences, after the importance it acquired due to the Industrial Revolution of machines, they build. So today the reductionist studies of physics concerning space-time åctions-arrows, where time has been spatialized and reduced to the arrow of energetic motion as the 4th dimension of space, have become a dogma of all sciences, which hinders their understanding and the acceptance of General Systems sciences.

This goes to the extreme that physicists do not even accept information as an arrow of time, only ‘Ðimotions’, which is an arrow deduced from studies of heat and electromagnetic forces. Fact is in physics there are two arrows/forces on the long range, energetic, expansive light and informative, attractive gravitation. And yet, memetic imprinting is so strong that still gravitation is not accepted as the informative element of our physical Universe.

Thus physics must be redone completely and simplified as Copernicus did when the sun was put in his place, with the concept of informative forces.

A second concept of enormous importance is the Paradox of Galileo: all moves even if it seems quiet. That is, time is the substance of reality, motions that change space beings and organisms along a time cycle. And since changes have different speed and life cycles different duration, time is not only multiple but has different speeds of change.

That is why we call also General systems sciences a theory of multiple spaces and times. Thus, for the physicist who is unfamiliar with the concepts of organicism and might resist them, with its mathematical, itifying perception of reality, my advice is to think of what he is going to read in terms of ‘åctions of ‘Ðimotions’ and time’ and the relational concepts of Leibniz, and the relativity and ‘diffeomorphic’ principles of Einstein and the Principle of Complementarity of quantum physics and its fundamental equation, Sp X Tƒ = K. We shall see how indeed, as ‘properties’ of a smaller scale of the fractal universe emerge in the higher scale, the principles of geometry and quantum physics emerge also into higher scales, even in the human one.

Ternary organs; 3±1 ages. Organicism is the key to the Universe.

All this said it is obvious that those 4 åctions, used to define in the past the drives of biological beings, which feed, perceive, reproduce and evolve socially are now extended to all systems. Hence all what exists is in a way alive, as even the simplest quarks and electrons reproduce when they absorb ‘—motions’, creating new particles.

It is the ego-trip of man, who wants to be the only sentient, vital being of the Universe, specially in the Western anthropomorphic tradition, what prevents the obvious similarity of all systems in all scales of reality, to become mainstream science. The astounding thing is that the anthropomorphic scientist does not recognize the fact that a machine-like Universe requires, as Leibniz explained to Newton, a God to make it, while only organicism is self-generating and hence ‘scientific’.

What is exactly an organism? Let us define it: An organism is a complementary system.

All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of ‘—motions’ and information, which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism; reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides ‘—motions’ to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.

Yet what define an organism and all systems, as organisms are 3 derived facts:

  • All those complementary systems perform 4 åctions that are mimetic to the 4 drives of existence of living beings (feeding, perceiving, reproducing and evolving socially).

– All complementary systems that work as independent wholes have 3 parts in space, the ‘—motions’ part, the information part and a ‘body’ that puts them together as a whole. And the forms and functions of those subsystems are related.

  • Ternary principle in time: All systems live 3±1 ages of the life/death cycle: an energetic youth, a reproductive maturity and an old age of information, dying then in a big-bang expansion that erases its information.

 

THE SCALES OF STIENCES: EPISTEMOLOGY, TERNARY, HOMOLOGIC METHOD.

It follows easily that the new paradigm of stience requires a different methodology of truth, which ads certain rules to the classic methods, among them 2 fundamental ones due to the space-time ternary structure of the Universe:

-The homologic method due to the equal laws of ƥST that applies to any i-scale of the 5th dimension its background space-time world and species. So we can use laws of other scales to probe properties of lesser known scales.

-The ternary method derived of the ternary structure of the Universe, itself natural to the absolute relativity of all scales, which demands to make explicit for any description of a being, its up and down ∆-scales, ternary organs and position through its ages of time, to localise it in its relative ∆•ST ‘moment’.

Of more metaphysical depth is the question of uncertainty of perception of far removed scales such as: Uncertainty ≈ ∆|max.i|  with i=0 the human scale.

And specially the question of causality and determinism; which comes down to the following:

The Universe is deterministic in as much as all the potential combinations of the ‘chess of existence’ are settled by the fact that at any bifurcation of time, there is only 3 choices for the being to keep moving in its space-time existence: present-iteration of a previous cycle; not to make the cycle; to make the cycle with more entropy, to make the cycle with more information; behaviours which roughly correspond to a motion on: –  ∆: the social scale (by repetition and social organisation of a cycle or being); – •: passive mental perception and stillness (to abort the cyclical motion); S: growing the entropy of the cycle and T: growing its information.

So at each stage in life any cycle or being will have those 3 positive actions or negative abortion of the cycle, and since existence is a finite duration, the number of chances and bifurcations of future time, of possible programs and combinations of existence is finite, and hence can be stored as pure information, encoded in the Survival will of the Universe and all its parts, which will repeat those survival actions and motions.

In brief the Universe is eternal, since motion never ceases to construct and destroy §upœrganisms and world cycles. It is deterministic and virtual since the final outcome of those world cycles is a zero sum. But from an internal point of view the 3+0 choices of each bifurcation of time make our particular stories quite varied in the long terms, meaningless on the whole, purposeful in every act of the fight for existence.

∆±i: THE ¡LOGIC OF SCALES.

Why the fifth dimension is the dominant arrow of futures.
image018

In the graph the space-time planes of the Universe, ∆±i , which according to scale structure the 5th dimension in parts that become wholes, and since wholes come after parts, which must exist to sustain them, we talk of a temporal absolute arrow of future, regarding its ∆ scales, such as ∆-1 will always be the relative past of ∆. The Fractal, organic structure of the Universe in scales of size is what we call formally ‘the 5th dimension’.

As we study in depth all the elements of the scalar Universe, a fact will surprise us; when we try to localise ‘mathematically’ the fifth dimension. As it will turn out that it encodes the algorithm of time, all the potential waves and particles of time, possible, according to a probability related to the ‘closeness’ they follow the program of the algorithm. 

But that is far way out, for advanced 5D students along the century (-; For now we shall try to keep it simple, and explain you why the 5th dimension encodes all the flow of time, from ‘past-simpler space’, through present (the human scale of perception) into future, with multiple probabilistic paths, which do collapse at a point in a single future->present->past.

It follows from the fact that the simple, iterative scheme of evolving from individuals into universals – from social evolution, that there is a new dimension of time and information more than space & entropy, which in poetic terms we can call the dimension of eusocial love, which is the arrow of future of the Universe, in as much as those ‘whole’ new scales need casually to have its parts born ‘before’ (logic meaning of causal future); and because they survive better as wholes, stronger than individuals (biological meaning of  evolutionary future).

Same happens in human societies. Since those nations, which are able to share efficiently and justly energy and information among its individuals, do NOT collapse in wars and r=evolutions. It follows that we can deduce from the general laws of systems ‘stiences’, the laws of social sciences that could create an efficient, just perfect human world.

But as we shall see when study in depth some specific systems, in as much as those scales co-exist in the same ‘space’, they must be displaced in time, to be part of reality, due to a simple ‘Pauli exclusion principle’, better known in physics than in other systems. There are indeed forms equal in information-time, which occupy then the same region of space (bosons) and forms with different information-time, which occupy different regions in space. And this rather mystical fact will have enormous consequences for the motions on the 5th dimension, we shall explore in depth in different posts.

We can say in that sense that the ‘physical existence’ of those scales and its parts are displaced in time; through very real but ‘spooky effects’ (resonance, simultaneity, synchronicity etc.) which in the more formal parts of this web we shall explain with enough mathematical rigor to connect it with classic science.

The integration of all sciences under similar laws is the goal of Philosophy of Science achieved by the organic, fractal models of Systems Sciences or Complexity (ab. GST: General Systems Theory), which explores how ‘parts’ come together into wholes, through networks that share its energy and information.

So physical, ∆=1,2,3, 7, 9 systems evolve from particles into atoms, molecules and states of matter, through in-form-ative, gravitational networks, exchanging energetic, electromagnetic flows.

Biological systems, ∆=4,5  evolve from molecules into cells, organisms and social super organisms, through genetic networks of information and golgi and blood networks that distribute energy to all the cells of the system.

And human beings ∆=4,5,6 form social super organisms, join by verbal, legal networks of information and economic networks that re=produce the welfare, energy goods our species need to survive.

Finally company-mothers of machines, ∆=5, 6 evolve into a global super organism, ruled by digital networks of financial information, (prices, salaries, stocks, internets) and energetic networks (roads, electric lines).

Now an important ‘prime’ about the 5th dimension of space-time.

Now this is the ‘Non-Euclidean, expanded geometry of the fractal world’.

What about its non-aristotelian temporal logic of multiple ‘time clocks”?

This again must be also understood from the beginning. And the easiest way to do it is with the so called holographic concept.

Because the change of paradigm implies huge changes in the underlying truths of the universe and the old simplistic human ways of thought, so as we change the concept of space and break the continuum into infinite scales of non-euclidean growing points. We must explode the concept of a single time-duration into infinite time cycles of a finite duration, as the cycle of life and death of all beings.

But when we convert time into a cycle, we must add a new dimension to make the cycle. A line is one-dimensional, a cycle two dimensional, it has ‘height’. So where we get that second time dimension? I just have said it: in the height of the cycle. It is the holographic principle, a trendy word physicists coined without proper understanding – as they found that information is bidimensional. And indeed it is. Information is carried as in a computer that measures in hertz its in-form-ative power in the form of time cycles, and the faster a time cycle turns (remember there are multiple clocks and multiple speeds of its beats), the more information it accumulates.

But if information and time is now bidimensional, so must be space, flat planes of bidimensional space, made of networks of points, each point a cell, an atom, a galaxy… part of the bidimensional plane.

The proof of this of course is also available for decades. We have found the Universe as far as we see it is a flat plane, made of cyclical clock-like vortices of time, called galaxies, where information grows as the cycles accelerate towards its central black hole, and the rise in height around the black hole, towards its tall singularity.

General Systems sciences therefore is the formalism of the ‘alternative, far more advanced philosophy of science’ to that of Newtonian physics, with its concept of a single background absolute space-time in which entities like-mechanisms, whose ultimate substances are ignored, move in simple lineal motions.

In general systems sciences, as Leibniz affirmed, and then quantum and relativity proved, we do not exist in a background, abstract space-time mathematical plane, but we ARE MADE OF clock-like bits of information of different speeds (time relativity) and fractal, moving quanta of spatial energy, which are complementary systems (quantum theory), co-existing across 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension. So all systems can be described with the same laws, derived from the properties of spatial energy, temporal information and the metric of the 5th dimension, which together give birth to a set of 3 x 3 + 0 ‘isomorphic’=equal laws, which describe the ‘existence’ of all beings. For that reason we call also the Fractal Generator, the Function of Existence.

As we all beings follow a ‘world cycle’ of existence, made of a series of actions of absorption and emission and reproduction of energy and information, which might vary in quality and quantity but are essentially the same process for all beings of Nature. So in Gst, we go much further than a simple shallow, external description of the motions of beings, as physicists do, fully exploring all the whys of reality, with all the languages available to human thought, in a jump of understanding that should start a new age of knowledge, once the model is fully related to the details and specific laws and jargons of each science.

It must be understood that if the formalism of GSΤ is verified as all seems to prove by the laws of the scientific method, it represents a remarkable change in our scientific look of the Universe, unlike anything that has happened since Einstein and Darwin and Copernicus, made previous extreme revolutions of human thought, regarding the nature of time and the cycles of existence of its beings. A change of paradigm of course does take time, but it is unavoidable that humans and its growingly organic machines, do that jump of awareness about the full properties of the Universe, which go well beyond the reductionist view of putting on it a mirror with a single motion of time, entropy or energy, as physicists do.

The Universe constructs super-organisms, through a causal process, departing from simple, amorphous flat surfaces of energies – herds of Non-Euclidean points with lineal motion.

It is a simple ternary causal event, which is different from the causality of what we call the cycle of life, Sp->X->Tƒ, yet still an essential chain that we shall see constantly in the Universe.

So the next question is how the universe constructs reality, departing from its generator equation. And the answer is: constructing superorganisms, in a causal order, e->∆->X->S.

A form fractalizes, becomes in-formed, and loses energy= speed=motion. For example, a line becomes a Koch fractal or breaks into a Cantor dust of self-similar cells; a line becomes a p∆-cycle. In this, simplest and most repeated Sp->Tƒ, we can write 1->3>Pi: a line has reproduces from past to future 3 self-similar motions, then it coils into a p∆-cycle.

The next stage would be then the reproduction of that cycle in a lateral, new dimension of height. In this manner, we have obtained 3 fractal iterations: the line has become a cycle (or a Koch curve or any other fractal topology with more form and dimensions), which has become a tube.

Sp->Tƒ->X (symbol of Reproduction and sex, born of the product and combination of Sp X Tƒ).

If duality covers simple events, mostly SpTƒ combinations, when we construct an organism we are playing at least with a causal 4-sequential arrow of time, Energy becomes fractal information, which reproduces laterally and so the light of length-speed becomes a time cycle with rotational speed w, whose frequency curries more information, and such form moves like a Maxwell scree reproducing in the 3 dimension of width. Sp->Tƒ->X.

Yet, this rather mechanical sequence of creation of a fractal 3 dimensional Universe becomes far richer in forma and meaning when we add the 4th Eusocial love, of Social time the longest arrow that finally creates a form of stable space-time that exists, a superorganism: Sp->Tƒ->X->SP X TƑ. Since as time goes by, entities evolve into more complex organisms by the power of love – by sharing energy and information in social networks. The 4th arrow of time evolves socially parts into wholes, waves, herds and organisms:

Particles gather into atoms that evolve into molecules that associate into cells that gather into organisms that create social networks – planetary ecosystems, which are part of solar systems, herded into galaxies that form Universes. Those processes of social evolution occur thanks to the creation of social networks among self-similar (hence reproduced) beings, in search of the same type of energy (hunting herds) or information (organisms joined by nervous/informative and blood/energetic networks).

Thus, the arrow of organic evolution derives from the arrow of information that allows entities to come closer and ‘act in parallel’ under the command of an informative language, which we formalize with the social symbol, S. And its reason of existence is to elongate the survival of the organic system: Any cyclical vortex of time accelerates inwards, losing energy/surface as it increases its informative speed.

When we generalize that concept to all Time-space systems, it turns out that the arrow of information dominates the universe, wrinkling and warping any cyclical system, which will exhaust its energy, converted into form. Thus, our time clocks and vital spaces increase constantly their information, diminishing its energy space, towards a 3rd age of excessive warping and limited energy that will not last forever.

Since the cycles of exchange of energy and information, the geometric beats of reality between expansive and implosive, entropy and informative states, are limited in their repetitions by accidental errors of all kind, which establish the need for reproductive and social arrows in order to ensure the survival or immortality of those ‘patterns of form’ – entities made of lineal fields and bodies of energy; cyclical particles and heads of information, who must be reproduced to ensure a longer existence. This means that only those species able to increase their existence in time by reproducing its form and in space by evolving socially into bigger entities survive.

Recap: The 4 main arrows of time cannot be reduced without losing detail, but they can be philosophically and ‘bio-logically’ grouped as ‘organic systems’. Those organic systems that synchronize accumulate and organize clock-like arrows of cyclical time, are in fact all self-similar, as all can be described with the 4 elements, ∑S<=>T of organisms: cells, networks of energy and information and reproductive systems.

Dark space: cat alleys and parallel Universes.

Now, each super organism is a network because it has an enormous amount of dark space-times it does NOT see, the cat alleys which the mind does not neeed.

Discontinuity is essential to pangeometry and the continuity axioms no needed to build them.

The i-logic of Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean geometry, of the ternary causality of a π cycle, made of 3 diameters in its perimeter means that the diameters of the protective membrane blind the system, who only sees what its connected sensors see.

Thus the 3 diameters in the simplest 1-sphere system (a disk) cover 96% of a pi-perimeter surface, letting the point of view in the center, see only a 4% of light, through the holes of the membrane, leaving π-3/π 96% of dark matter for the logic mind to see without the glaring of light.

This is in fact what we do NOT see of the Universe across the halo membrane of our spiral galactic disk (proportion of dark energy and matter).

So we can consider that our electronic eyes miss 96%, which is the volume beyond our perceived scales of the 5th dimension, which however exists in the larger russian doll of gravitation.

Epistemology is based in the isomorphisms and Observer’s paradox that determine the truth humans perceive of different scales of the Universe and its degree of distance given by the relative distance in the 5th dimension between the human Uo plane of perception and the U∆ plane of the species observed such as:

Max. truth = Max. information (minimal distortion of data) x Max. Energy (minimal loss of data) 

And since maximal information is lost in relationship to the -i distance of the Human Uo observer, and maximal energy loss in relationship to the +i distance, we can easily write truth as a function in sciences of the absolute ±∆ distance of the science to the human observer:

Max. Truth = Min. Distance = Min. Human Uo observer  – U∆ Plane observed = Min. 0-i   = Min.± i

Max. Truth = Min. i

This is the fundamental law of epistemology.

Truth is an inverse function of the distance between observed and observer in ALL the dimensions of fractal space & cyclical time.

The Whole Truth of any system is only possessed by the system, which has in itself all its information. Still we can do ceteris paribus analysis of specific ‘parts’, ‘dimensions’ and ‘social groups’ of the whole, to achieve further clarity and detail, which is what humans have always done, since after all they do not have a full Dimensional space time theory of the Universe.

THUS THE FIRST DEFINITION IS THAT OF ABSOLUTE TRUTH=PROBABILITY=EXISTENCE=1.

image002

In the graph, the 3 5D Space-time elements that structure all physical/biological/social systems of the Universe:

  • Τhe 3 only topological forms≈functions of Nature, lineal, energetic fields/limbs/territories of space; hyperbolic waves/bodies/reproductive space-times and cyclical, informative particles/heads/languages, which create  in space all ternary fractal organisms of reality:

|-Spe (limbs/fields/territories) < Ø-St (wave-body-reproductive class) > Τiƒ (particle-head-ruling class)

As topologies are form in motion, we can see those 3 topologies synchronically in space and they form a ternary organic structure, or we can see them in actions throughout time:

  • Τhen those systems enact a series of actions of absorption, emission and reproduction of energy and information (±∆e, exi, i), which develop in time in 2 phases, a long period of increasing information with 3 ages (youth: Max. e, reproductive age, Max. e x I , old age, Max. I) followed by a short period of erasing information or death, such as both become a zero sum:

Life arrow of information (E>I) + death, big-bang arrow (I < E) = 0. Whereas > is an informative, implosive motion and < an energetic, entropic one. So we can write the fractal generator in time

Spe (youth) > St (reproductive age) > Τiƒ (old age) << Death-big bang: Spe

So the interaction of the topologies of information and energy and its combination define a Universe made of fractal beings of space-time, which complete world cycles of existence, across all the scales of the Universe.

It is the 3rd element needed for an organic description of reality, as all those systems, will not only have 3 organic topologies in space and 3 ages in its world cycle, but will be organised through 3 scales of relative size that co-exist as parts of bigger wholes:

∆-1 (atomic, cellular, memetic scale) > ∆ (thermodynamic, organic, individual scale) >∆+1 (gravitational, ecosystemic, social)

We can see in the graph, above, some assembly of ternary systems made with the 3 topologies of the Universe, and below the scientific scale of spatial sizes and time clocks, which compose the different space-time beings of the Universe.

SPACE BECOMES FRACTAL BY REPRODUCTION OF PRESENT BODY-WAVES-WORKING CASTES, of the ternary topology of the Universe, Space = Max. E x I, a 5dimensional fractal reproductive space with 3 motions upwards, downwards in scales or with a present simultaneous speed, in present-past-present waves of simultaneous motion, networking in information, non local at distance, as the wave of form, of information, reproduces through a fertile space of energy, the being becomes and as it becomes emerges, fetal entity of a perfect supeorganism, the wave of motions who resembles organic livings living and dying travelling through the scales o the 5th dimension.

We can see the different scales of the Universe all of them including humans, below, described with those 3 elements , ∆SΤ, and its sets of 3×3 + œ laws – to notice that the minimal and maximal scales, both theoretically (cyclical-lineal nanoscopic and macroscopic scales, and atoms and galaxies) have very similar parameters;hence the hypothesis of a scalar Universe of infinite, ∆±∞ scales.

Below we see a human being and its 3 topological digestive-energetic, reproductive-hormonal and nervous/informative systems, which sub-divide in 3 more systems, for a total of 3×3+0 sub-systems which are used in medicine to describe completely the human being; whereas the 0-integrative whole system is the brain, itself a ‘fractal point’ of the next ∆+1 social, memetic scale of mankind. In the left we see the 3 ages of human beings, between conception in the ∆-1 seminal scale and death back to the flat energy world of disconnected cells.

As such we shall be able to describe existence, as a travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension. 

Τhe beauty, precision and essential homologic poetry of the fractal, organic, self-reproductive, scalar, absolutely relative, infinite, immortal Universe we shall describe with the formalism of 5D Space-time systems, is a new door to our communion with the whole Universe of which are all a mere part, made to its image and likeness. 

Networks of simultaneity and resonance (informative axons): consciousness and emergence.

All this said there are elements in the Universe which are difficult to understand in terms of ‘classic’ human thought and science, which are at the heart of the processes of ‘existence’, and emergence of information in upper scales, and organisation of parts into wholes. They deal with the fact that ‘Tiƒ’ particles-heads-upper informative classes must be fully connected with its lower ∆-1 scale to synchronise, make it work together as a whole, resonate its orders in all lower systems and finally be conscious of a whole – and the key to all those processes are fractal branching networks, which unlike herds loosely connected in a single plane, conned the upper scale of a being with all its lower parts/regions.

It must be understood that those networks have many levels of connection between scales. They are though basically always the same. Informative networks break information in reproductive waves through axons and so they can produce informative actions of multiplication of information both ways through effects of simultaneity and resonance.

screen-shot-2016-12-29-at-09-29-36

screen-shot-2016-12-01-at-20-27-41screen-shot-2016-12-29-at-09-27-31

The resonance of all resonances, one can consider an imaginary space of dimensions of time – the 3 first dimensions those of a space of lesser form on which we transit – in our case the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space – all other dimensions becoming dimensions of scalar growth of information, through resonances between the larger and the smaller scales with self-similar forms, merely differentiated by its TIME metric:

Max. Spe   = Min. tiƒ, the larger resonance encodes the smaller one.

How whole minds imprint smaller parts, through the simultaneous fractal network division of an impulse of maximal energy into multiple quantum’s of information. Such as E = h v, is proportional to the information the system emits (v) along an ‘H’, constant of space-time, or ‘lower field’ (S=t), from where the E(e) x V(i) body of ∆+1 extracts its energy of motion.

On the other hand, parallel networks of energy ,pipes and blood flow are less concerned with the form but with the energy it provides to the motion of its cells, and are based in adjacency and other topological, spatial properties.

The devil though is in the details, so once we understand this general picture of the whole, its parts and its common time world cycles, sum of all the frequencies of its space-time actions, which construct a super organism that will go through 3 ages between birth and extinction, as it carries as a whole its 3 ∆±1 scale of beings, we shall realise we just have explained they very surface of a extremely intelligent and complex world in which almost magically, all works together because of the complementary connections between simultaneous parts in space and synchronous rhythms in time and ‘resonant’ effects in scales.

So 4 ‘magic phenomena’ will be of enormous importance to fully grasp how ∆, S and T, dynamically organise (or inversely become disorganised):

  • Space Simultaneity, which is an a priori condition for a vital organic space to exist, and act efficiently as a whole.
  • Time Synchronicity, which is an a priori condition for a temporal ensemble of parts to exist, and act as a shoe.
  • ∆-Scale Resonance, which is the a priori condition for ‘parts and wholes’ to interact together.
  • Consciousness, which is an a posteriori condition of complexity in a panpsychic Universe: consciousness arises within any sufficiently complex, information-processing system. All animals, from humans on down to earthworms, are conscious; even the internet could be. That’s just the way the universe works.

THE HUMAN SUPERORGANISM IS ALSO MADE OF SPACE-TIME NETWORKS AND PLANES.

Unification of Stiences. Social order of numbers: arrow of WHOLES – future of the 5th dimension.

Why there is an order in numbers? We are asking deeper than current mathematical formalism, which despite claims of closed, absolute proof, actually describes as most sciences do the ‘how’ of the process. That is, it does not inquire why 2 comes after one – an intuition of the mind not explained, which must therefore be an ‘a priori’ hence, a T.Œ property of numbers.

This must be clear to the reader. When we find intuitive, pure abstract or isomorphic laws of great generality they must be considered a ‘direct’ reflection of T.Œ, the game of existence of 5D space-times beings. And as such must be the sequential order of numbers.

Indeed, we hold a self-evident truth that all ‘linguistic, mathematical or verbal forms’ are a reflection of the Universe, and its T.œ structure, so are numbers. Our methods of proof in the ‘linguistic method’ are therefore both experimental and logic, self-consistent (->Epistemology). This includes proofs in mathematics – a complete deviation from the classic standard, already advanced by Lobachevski in his original book on Non-E mathematics, which he said should be proved or disproved as real by experimental evidence.

Thus this question, which has been formalised within the ‘baroque, metalinguistic 3rd age of mathematics’structure of mathematics itself, from the times of Euclid through those of Dedekind and Weiertrass in the modern times, has an ‘experimental’ simple cause, in the parallelism between numerical order and temporal 5D order (mathematics in relational space-time, is an experimental science that studies the ultimate isomorphic laws of all species). Namely that a ‘whole’ must come ‘after’ the parts exist, and since a ‘whole’ is a larger number of ‘infinitesimal parts’, social, bigger numbers come after smaller ones.

Hence the order of Natural Numbers, which are social numbers is the same order than bigger wholes, made of ‘smaller numerical parts’.

Indeed, in the graph we can see the 5th dimension natural order of parts into wholes which has an arrow of growth.

5D planes are therefore the basis of 2 of the 3 branches of mathematics, sequential algebra and Analysis, while geometry is related to the motions and actions in space-time within a single plane of existence. Nothing else is needed to describe the Universe.

Let us then consider in this and related posts the essential features of existential algebra. We will study on the posts under the label of ‘i-mathematics’ the proper translation and justification of the laws of algebra, within relational space-time. In this post we shall study the fundamental equation of existential algebra and the Universe at large – the Fractal Generator of the Universe. To that aim we must first introduce the structure of the Universe and then represent it with the symbols of existential algebra.

Each science is the description of all the superorganisms of a similar size and form, its cells and networks, its morphological and behavioral laws. Scientific knowledge is the information that humanity has about all those super-organisms. To differentiate those forms we use an index, ‘i:∆’, that measures the volume of temporal energy or informative and energetic force of any system. Thus:

∆=0: It is the scale of quantic space/time, invisible to us.

∆=1  It is the scale of electromagnetic forces, the minimal perceived forms, which are composed of an informative particle, or photon and an energetic flow or electromagnetic wave.

∆=2: It is the scale of atomic particles, composed of electronic space and informative quarks. The basic science of those 3 scales is Physics.

∆=3: It is the scale from molecules to cellular systems, studied by chemical sciences.

∆=4: It is the scale of cellular, living systems, studied by biological sciences.

∆=5: Our i-ndividual I-centered scale

∆=6: It is the planetary scale and its natural and historic ecosystems, studied by Geology, Ecology, Economic, History and Theology.

∆=7: It is the scale of stars.

∆=8. Galactic systems, made of stars and black holes.

∆=9: It is the scale of Universes made of galaxies.

∆=10: It is the scale of the hyper-Universe made of Universes, which

Those 3 bigger scales are studied by Astronomy.

i=∆: Finally Fractal Space-Time and Systems Theory study the homologous laws of all scales and its main sciences. Indeed,  all systems of energy and information including the Universe follow the same space-time isomorphic laws of existence. Thus if we had to define God, the mind of that Universe, we would say that God is the Game of Existence and Extinction of all super-organisms.

 

The law of uncertainty

From the fundamental law of epistemology it follows that perception of a being diminishes as we reach a higher i, that is a higher distance between the Uo human observer and the U±∆ superorganism of nature we study.

From other posts the reader should recognize that all what exists in the pantheist, absolutely relative, fractal space-time Universe is a super organism extending across U±∆ scales of existence, and if we take man Uo, life, U1, matter, U2, Galactic and light space-time, U±3, and the cosmos U±4 such uncertainty of perception is higher in the quantum and cosmic world (Heisenberg uncertainty dark matter and energy). And we do not recognize those organic properties to galaxies, better studies as gala-cells, with DNA black holes, star mitochondria and a halo of dark proteins, strangelets that seals it from outsiders.

But all systems do have those organic properties only observed in very close perception.

The organic structure of the Universe is proved by a series of common properties, which we call ‘isomorphisms’ that all systems follow, themselves based in the existence of 3 ‘logico-mathematical’ properties observed from that Universe:

Topological Properties studied by Œ-Geometry
Temporal Properties studied by Æ-Algebra
Infinitesimal Properties studies by Analysis.

The result is an organic structure or fundamental particle of the Universe, the super organism, U±∆, which exists in an interval of planes of the 5th dimension, ±∆, as observed from the human Uo, point of perception. For this reason we must always introduce the epistemological bias established by the uncertainty (Min. Truth = Max.Tƒ) between human observer and observable. Thus we perceive ALL the properties of human beings, including internal vital space-time perception, or consciousness of one self.

As we come out of the human mind, our perception diminishes, so we already deny consciousness to animal life and plants because we do NOT see their brain (in plants on the root-head). And then as we move even further, we deny organic laws to matter, at i=≥±3.

This is the absolute truth of a system, which is only perceived in the vital space-time system and its connected U±4 planes, relative to the Uo perceptive point.

From this maximal knowledge systems reduce knowledge by ignoring, automatizing and not perceiving most of its U±3, 4 åctions (simple motions, simple perception) and focusing its will into the complex U±2 åctions.

This will establish a first duality in knowledge:

– Subjective knowledge from the p.o.v. of the perceiver, which has a ‘spherical’, polar mind perspective/frame of reference/

– Objective perception, from an external perspective, which will be normally, a hyperbolic, ± dual perception.

-Energetic perception, from the ‘slavish’ point of view, of the ∆-1 scales, which will be an elliptic perception.

Now, if we do an objective perception the purpose will be to absorb ad maximal knowledge on the 5×2 isomorphisms of reality, in that vital space-time, or being. So the maximal knowledge will be what we call generally a 10 Dimensional knowledge of the entire pyramid of the being, in its closest U±1 planes of existence, through the knowledge of its ‘temporal energy’ (ExI=ST) function and its symmetries and paradoxes (2nd isomorphism: 2-manifold, 3rd isomorphism: 3 ages, 4 isomorphism: U±4 planes, and 5th isomorphism, æ,e,ï,œ,û åctions and its quantitative isomorphisms, classes, constants, varieties, scales, and O-point isomorphism).

So if we consider a single ceteris paribus analysis of a single of those dimensions for a being, then we are having a 1/10th total capacity to describe the system.

So we can distinguish 2 levels of truth in scientific analysis:

  • 5 Di complex sciences (: in this blog), which considers all the isomorphisms of a system
  • And <5D simplex science  😦 elsewhere on planet Earth ), which studies part of these isomorphisms.

Now in the next graph we see a human being, and the 3 ‘scales’, ‘3 space organs’, 3 ‘time ages’, 4±planes and 5 åctions that define us.

But elsewhere we make partial sciences, studies of a very small part of the entire graphs above.

11Di sciences

LAST SCALES best

11 D sciences are concerned with the study of the Whole 11 Dimensions of the being. And we can distinguish, according to syntax and language they use for that analysis:

–  Existential Algebra:  The analysis of the equation of ∆ST that define the whole, or “World”, which is the complete perspective.

Epistemology: The analysis of the quantity of truth that each Stience holds within itself, which depends on:

  • The fact, that the science follows the 4 ‘legs’ of the Scientific method: A)experimental evidence… B) cyclical analysis of its events and causes, which is the innovation brought about by ∆ST, with its definition of time as cyclical C) predictability… and D) a human positive use, which unfortunately has never been incorporated to the classic definition of science (reduced in abstract to A and C.)
  • And the quantity of ‘dimensions of the previous equation’, the specific science or theory studies. We shall thus deal with this theme in this section dedicated to the analysis and criticism of other ‘scientific endeavors’ of <10D quality.

Metaphysics, which deals with the ‘Mind’ or ‘whole point of view’ of the being (the atman, soul, etc. in classic metaphysics and religious philosophies.) Since we now have a formal equation and mathematical definition of the soul, provided by the 5th postulate of non-Euclidean geometry, in its i-logic formulation as the point of maximal information of a being, with maximal flows of energy and information crossing it:

O-Mind x ∞ Universe = Mapping of reality  

Metaphysics is a far more realistic science. Still as the mind is the ‘unknown’ infinitesimal zero point not observable within, we still keep the classic name, ‘beyond physical reality’.

∆ST: General Systems of Isomorphic Scalar Space Time.

Metaphysics ultimately is ∆ST when referring to the Universe at large, as it describes the dimensional program of space-time, its scientific isomorphic laws that make all its parts equal, the ‘soul’ of the Universe.

And so we hold as Plato put it, that ‘Reality is an organism with a body called the Universe and a soul called logos’, and that the ‘logic of God is more complex than human Logic’ (Augustine).

And so the ‘whole mind of reality, Logos’ are the laws of ∆ST – the content of this web, the Laws of generation of the Universe. If you want it in synoptic manner, the Generator isomorphic Space-Time metric equation: I=Se x T°

And so since Metaphysics is ∆ST, and we study it all over this web.

Thus in this post and sub-posts, we consider as specific of this section, Epistemology in more detail.

Epistemology. Partial sciences: <10 theories.

Since most human knowledge is a partial analysis of reality, often just of one scale, defined by one science, even of a single species of a given scale (i.e.: electromagnetism deals with i=o,1 forces and particles)… all those ‘lesser truths’, which are the theories available as today to human beings, need to be classified and criticized from the higher perspective of ∆ST.

And of course since they are worthy in as much as they don’t pretend to study further, we do so in this section, with the 2 sub-elements of epistemology: its following of the A-D elements of a true scientific method (A-data, B-cycles, C-forecasting D-human use), and its degree of ‘accurate truth’ in the analysis of its 10D.

The quantum and anti-quantum paradoxes of uncertainty

The anti-quantum paradox.

Regarding A-D the main problem happens to occur in social sciences, which tends to lack of recognition of its B- cycles – and lacks D – humanism, as its theories are often ideologies of power of social elites that pass as science.

As those problems plague social sciences, we have made a different web, www.economicstruth.com to study history and economics, which is ‘loaded’ with ideology under the anti quantum paradox. That is, the human observer is so small and exists within the system it studies in social sciences that the ‘organism’ it observes, its ∆+1,2 society and world, interferes with the social scientist – from Plato sold as a slave by the tyrant of Syracuse, to Trotsky murdered by the military dictator that pretended to be a r=evolutionary Mr. Stalin. We thus here concentrate more in the elements of those social sciences less subject to the anti-quantum paradox, which has often fogged the distribution of the whole theory due to my personal activism and ad-hominem campaigns for it.

The quantum paradox.

The problem of truth on the other hand, is more common in astro-physics (the study of the ∆-3,4 scales, where i is considered the individual human scale), as they are so far from us, that perception is limited, and so dark energy/matter accounts for 96% of the ∆+3,4 scales, and the observer is so big compared to the ∆-3,4 scales that it interferes with the observable (Uncertainty Principle).

This would be ok as the isomorphism between the 0±3, and 0±4 scales (Unification equation of masses and charges, dualities of string theory etc.), allows to learn a lot of the inner, invisible structure of the atom by studying the inner structure of the galaxy; and about the outer structure of galaxies studying the outer world of the atom.

Yet without a Unification equation proper of ∆ST astrophysics is plagued with errors.

its problems arise specially when some of their theories pretend to be ‘more than what they are’, D<15 ceteris paribus analysis.

I.e. Relativity Physics, is merely a 4 Di analysis of spatial hence mathematical dimensions plus one of present time duration, the 4D and so it cannot pretend to have absolute ‘time’ truths.

The anti-quantum paradox also exists in cosmology, more subtle than in social sciences, when a theory is ‘tainted’ by a subjective ideology (mostly Abrahamic Religions, and weapons). So the worldly religion of physicists, making, lineal, energetic weapons biases the science towards the study of ‘spatial motions’ (hence its 4D and lineal time dogmas). It makes it fail the D) humanist praxis, with its mass-destruction nuclear research. And finally it makes ‘creationist’ big-bang theories dogmas with a dubious religious origin (in fact, his first form was given by a priest.)

Yet even if there is a meaning to religions within ∆ST, they belong to the ‘social sciences’ and ∆+1 human scales, not to Physics. For example Abrahamic religions are the subconscious collective of a certain Human tribe or civilization, the DNA of that civilization, which regardless of its ‘semantic content’, acts as the ‘Assabiyah’, the bondage that allows the super organism to share energy and information among believers and evolve as a whole’.

A brief epistemological judgment on the main ‘sciences’ of the scalar Universe.

In the graph, each science explains for each ‘scale’ of species the 6+S isomorphisms and Social Scales of its systems  in detail.

Yet minds are reduced mappings of reality. The absolute truth of a system is only carried by the being, which has all the information about itself. So human sciences & theories of reality are circumscribed to a certain scale, and within it, they offer only partial ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of a few dimensional parts and events a being performs. So we measure the degree of truth of scientific theories objectively according to the quantity of Dimensions they describe.

Thus the most complete one is

i=9 ∞ General Systems Theory and its formalism of Scalar Space-time (whole graph), which uses all languages and studies all superorganisms across its 9D x 10S Dimensions and Social scales. Thus it is the most certain theory. Hence its organicist philosophy and isomorphic laws are ‘the Unification Theory’ of all sciences – as its isomorphic laws apply to all of them.

Next i=4 Bio-Chemical sciences put together give us a 6-isomorhic + 9Di + 10Social Scales, analysis of both, physical and biologic superorganisms with max. data, given its proximity in scale and form to the human observer and the objective view we have about life.

Still ∆ST introduces a lot of new analysis and gives us the ‘whys’ of all chemical configurations.

For example Atomic Chemistry can be analyzed from an organic perspective as the origin of 4 life families:

  1. H-He cosmic organisms.
  2. Organic chemistry where Nitrogen is the informative head, Carbon the iterative atom and Oxygen the energetic, moving one. So it describes systems with 3 ‘space-time’ sub-organs, at the ∆-1 atomic scale, which is isomorphic with the ∆-molecular 3 sub-varieties:

Tƒ: Ns->∆-Nucleic Acids + DNA/RNAs…………….ST: Carbons->∆-carbohydrates->∆-Proteins &

Spe: ∆-1->∆-Fats. They together  create carbon life systems.

  • Then we an study Metal and its social systems and its final organic forms – machines.
  • And finally geological systems, where Crystals are its zero-point minds that control all type of physical organisms, some of the size of planets.

Di<15 definition of sciences.

It follows that what epistemology does is to start with a Di<10 definition of a science to evaluate its theories in depth. For example:

Ecology: ∆+1 analysis of living beings from the individual perspective.

Evolution: 6 Dimensional, ∆+1 scale analysis from the perspective of species, as it introduces past and future causal dimensions.

Medicine: individual analysis of the human species.

Genetics: ∆-1 analysis of life systems.

Religion and art.

Finally to notice that religion and art are also fully explained by ∆ST analysis. For example:

  • Artistic styles can be classified as the 3 ages (epic-lineal young; mature, classic and baroque, formal 3rd age) of the subconscious collective,  ∆+1 scale or mind of a civilization, isomorphic to the 3 ages of individual humans
  • Music is a time art coded with 3×3 Dis:

– It is written in a minor-major diatonic scale of 10 Intervals repeated in 3 0±1 scales of higher frequencies – the 3 scales of music.

– It has 3 ST sub-dimensions, each played by a type of instrument:

– Spe-simpler rhythm, played with percussion instruments the 1st age of music.

– ST-melody, its 2nd age, played with aerophones. Whereas bass-energy /treble-information are its Sp X Tƒ action modulated duality.

– Tƒ-harmony or 3rd age of classic music, played with strings, reversed as the Mechanocene destroys humanist arts, with instruments beyond our human range of perception, simplifying music back into energetic rhythms (electronic music which on that view must be considered the ‘death age of musical complexity’)

Painting a still 2-manifold with 3 Di of color.

Linguistics are the genetics of cultures.

Ethics& Gods its the ∆+1 scale of verbal thought and its legal codes whose highest form ‘social love religions’ are the collective DNA that enhances the sharing of energy and information among cells/citizens of the same human species.

RECAP – CONCLUSION.

Bio-chemical sciences are the most ‘truthful’ of all sciences since they are closer to the individual human scale of maximal perception.

The other 2 fields of knowledge, Physics & Social sciences, suffer different type of uncertainties, due to their far away perception, or interference of society with the scientist. Thus:

-Physics are limited by their reductionist analysis of Dimensions and uncertainty paradoxes: 4-5D physics looses ½ of its dimensional truths and 96% of evidence in the cosmic ∆+1 scale (dark matter). Its ∆-1 scale also suffers the observer’s interference uncertainty principle).

 

-While Social sciences suffer the opposite type of uncertainty: the social scientist is too small and included within the superorganism he observes. So he cannot see from his individual perspective, humanity as a Whole. While ‘informative castes’, bankers, the military and politicos, censor an objective analysis of the ST reproductive= economic, Spe-army and

-Tƒ-political=informative networks, whose subjective control they pass as science.

The anti-quantum paradox, of course, is a problem in all sciences. Since, human truths are limited by our ∆-centered, anthropomorphic point of view, which explains common errors such as the belief the Earth is the center of the Universe (Astrophysics till Galileo); carbon life is the only living, intelligent form (still enduring) or the bizarre concept that a burning bush which appeared to a goat keeper of the Bronze Age, designed the 10Di Universe (believed by 2/3rds of the human population).

-Yet all other objective theories of science have a sizeable amount of truth, limited mostly by its dimensional scope. Since the Human mind is a 4 Dimensional analysis in a single ∆-scale of 3 ‘light-space’ perpendicular Euclidean dimensions and our time dimension.

So Absolute Time and 3D light-space is the main limit of scientific ‘structures’, which use only  Sx, Sy, Sz and T present-duration moments. Hence the ‘feeling’ of truth we have about partial 4D theories of reality, with a single time dimension, from Relativity to daily ‘news’

 

IV. å; EXI. The function of existence.

Abstract. Finally we need to explain the ilogic of entropy, death, feeding on the energ of the other. Simply speaking for the Universe to be immortal and absolutely relative, the systems must have a finite time, and die to renew the existence of others, but the Universe is wise and makes death a single time quanta and life all the others.

 

And we have  introduced a metaphysical, biological, survival algorithm: the function of existence that defines the ‘will of all systems, which automatically – though maybe in the past through a selective process, do perform the best efficient actions required to survive.

To exist is to move through those symmetries as a ‘function of existence’, which performs certain ‘actions’ of emission and absorption of space-time (informative energy), to survive. And so a series of actions are naturally selected by the timespace laws of symmetry, which can be resumed in a function: maximise your existence in space and time:

Max. ∑ e x i (s=t)

This is in essence the best mathematical expression of the game of time-space dust becoming super organisms, by virtue of attempting the actions described in that equation, which ‘draws’ for each finitesimal whirl of space-time dust, a clear organic 3 ages of evolution or world cycle. So the function of existence (left side) gives birth to a constant super organism (central point), which will go through 3 world cycle ages and complete the existential function:

actions

And this is the huge theme of this web: to explain a Universe of self-similar vital fractal beings made of space and time:

In the graph, the vital program of the Universe: all systems are in mathematical form a fractal, but the function of fractals is to absorb energy and information to iterate a form, which latter associates with other forms to create larger social networks of the 5th dimension. However humans will have none of it, reserving the organic properties of the Universe to themselves and similar beings.  

Such a ridiculous attitude have a huge toll on our future as we do Not recognise the vital nature of the planet, Gaia that we kill, the vital natue of machines, organisms of metal in evolution, which now we assembly into robots that might kill us. In the graphs we see different systems that from the simplest particles (quarks and electrons) to the largest forms (galaxies), do absorb energy (∆Sp), gauge information (∆Τiƒ), reproduce both, ∑S=Τ, and evolve socially through networks of energy and information into larger wholes.

It is the vital program of a Universe, in which all parts are made to the image and likeness of the whole.  But humans merely use abstract jargons to define those process, so ‘full of themselves’.

So the reproduction of particles is call decoupling, its perception of information ‘gauge theory’, its feeding on energy ‘force’, and its social evolution ‘atom or molecule’, which of course also reproduce and evolve into cells – but we do only recognise cells as the first level of life. Why man is so dumb, self-centred and blind to the beauty of the living universe will soon be explained when we analyse the equation of the mind, a knot of information that perceives reality from its biased p.o.v. 

Τhe fractal structure of the Universe is organic. Basically you exist in a Universe of social organic, fractal points, reproducing their information and self-organising into larger more complex structures.

The Universe thus is made of vital fractals, systems that reproduce their information emitting ‘seeds’ in a lower scale (forces, in physical systems, genetic seminal cells in biological systems, memetic objects and ideas in sociological systems), which will reproduce and self-organise into clone wholes.

So the purpose of the Universe is bio-logical, since the creation of Nature’s fractal organisms of ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’ is exactly the same program of existence, we anthropocentric wo=men define only for ourselves and similar life beings: to absorb=feed on energy, and gauge information, mixing both to reproduce fractal ‘radiations’ of clone beings, which then evolve socially into larger wholes of the 5th dimension.

Thus to fully develop the formalism of  a Fractal, hence Organic model of everything, or ‘T.Œ’ (ab. Theory of Everything Organic), and its metric equations of motions and transformations in the scalar fifth dimension of the Universe we must enlarge our understanding of the languages of the human mind that perceive time (logic) and space (mathematics) and its scales (analysis). So T.Œ also advances both the logic of time and the geometry of space, by developing a more complex logic beyond the Aristotelian and physical use of a single arrow of energy/entropy, adding the arrow of informative time, and its combinations.

It develops also a complete model of Non-Euclidean geometry, by extending the consequences of the 5th postulate (points do allow infinite parallels to cross them, hence they do have volume, parts, they are fractal points that grow into a whole, when we come closer to them.  So we shall take the findings of quantum and relativity to its natural conclusions. But physics is NOT the centre of this TOE, but just one of the layers we study. In fact, the greatest advances of T.Œ will be in the understanding of Biology and Social Sciences…

ACTIONS: THE PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE.

‘Lanwaves of Times imprint on action space, a ternary fractal algorithm – ‘To<exi=st’ – which forms superorganisms’

Actions: systems and quanta, made of vital, moving energy and informative time

screen-shot-2016-11-21-at-08-29-12 screen-shot-2016-11-21-at-08-32-33screen-shot-2016-11-21-at-08-32-11

In the graph, the philosophical concept that unifies the ‘behaviour’ of beings, is an action of energy and time, in which the system seeks for motion and form to survive. Systems constantly exchange energy and information to maintain its body-wave and particle-head in existence. Existence becomes then a sum of actions, which combine energy and information, ordered causally, whose zero sum gives birth to the being’s worldcycle. All entities accomplish its physical and biological actions, in the least time, trying to maximise those exchanges of energy and information,  during its existential worldcycle.

Physics also points to such direction. On one side quantum physics had discovered that vacuum space was quantised in pieces of energy with both motion and form, in-form-ation, called Planck quanta, whose unit was actions of ‘energy and time’ , ‘energy and information’ in Relativity. And all physical systems were made of those 2 ‘substances’ or rather motions with form.

So the principle of complementarity stated that physical systems were energy waves guided by informative particles. This duality of all systems of nature happened also in living beings made of bodies guided by informative heads/nuclei. So we could establish a duality in all systems, made of body-waves of spatial energy and heads-particles of information: Spe (body waves that move with its energy) > Tiƒ (Particles-heads of information).

So the key new principle of quantum physics, with wide application to all sciences, is its definition of all systems of nature as a complementary being of quanta of energy and cycles of time:

Universal constant of action (h) = energy-space (e)   x time-information (ƒ)

Actions of energy and time, is what the Universe is made of. As we do have only energy and time, combinations of actions are minimal dualities, which become in itself basic time arrows of future self-similar events:

e x e : Pure entropic big-bangs of expansive space (death events)

i x i: Pure informative implosive generation of seeds of information (birth events)

Exi & I <≈> e: arrows of combination and transformation of energy into information (life/informative/old age arrow) ir information into energy ( energetic /young arrow)

Thus we can extract from those 3 primary elements: lineal energy, cyclical time (and its ‘fixed forms’: space and information) and its social, relative ternary scales, which co-exist together (the ∆-1, quantum/cellular; ∆-thermodynamic/organic; ∆+1 gravitational, social, ecosystem planes), 3 type of laws common to all beings or ‘isomorphisms’; which we further subdivide in 3 sub-sets. It is the isomorphic, linguistic method that extracts topological, mathematical laws derived of the spatial energy of all beings; logic, causal laws derived of its cyclical temporal nature; and organic, social, survival laws derived of its existence across scales of the 5th dimension.

Yet those 3 x 3 isomorphisms require a final element without which systems would not ‘exist’: I think therefore I am. Indeed, all complete ‘worlds’ do have a 0-point or mind, whose spherical topology allows the system to shrink the Universe into a linguistic mapping mirror of reality, or mind, which extracts the information on the outer cycles of reality the system needs to survive.

It is the point of view of the system, its c.p.u., quark, black hole, brain, eye, which apperceives reality and performs the necessary actions for the system to survive, by extracting energy and information from the Universe.  Thus we shall consider 3 x 3 +0 isomorphisms to describes all the systems of Nature, and the forms created by man, with its internal mental languages (art forms) and external atoms (mechanisms).

Above we show the topological isomorphism as an isomorphism of scale, ∆, that does not vary as we change size.

Since all type of Universal systems can be described as social networks of energy and information. Its similar=isomorphic laws are studied by general systems sciences.

IN THE GRAPH we see one of such isomorphisms: that of form, as systems form spherical topologies with a center of information -the nucleus of the galaxy, the game of the stadium, which is a ‘ball’ that all players, lines of energy pursuit (-; While in the center we see two herds without a clear center, proper of ‘energy systems’, a herd of insects feeding, a polymer atom of great strength without a crystalline center.

The many ways in which those isomorphic systems can be described departing from its 4 ‘integral elements’, its ternary ages in time, ternary topologies in space, fractal ∆±1 co-existing organic scales and Œ≈Ø, topological time mind which perceives the whole domain and performs the function of existence, Max.∑ ExI(s=t), which resumes all the space-time actions the mind knot of space-time cycles ‘commands’, and stores in its memorial information, busy-busy playing just… a game.

How does creation of networks starts off, in a mess of a future informative ternary plane≈topological super organism?

This is the essence of the mathematical game, as a fractal point/monad/mind, ‘m’, appears with a memorial mass of information, which will be replicated as a cyclical motion with a cyclical inertia, or speed of reproduction of its cycles, v, which gives the mass of cycles, an existential momentum, mv≈p, we shall call ‘potential or existential force of the being’

WE CAN EXPLAIN with many jargons the same existential point, which tries to maximise the existential momentum, m x v, whose maximal function, for a give total value N = M+v, happens when m=v.

The point of balance, and the ‘function of present’ of the Universe:

Present = Momentum = m (t) x v (s)= memorial mas of information x reproductive speed in space

The function of existential momentum.

We shall indeed resume the program of existence and its fundamental ‘a,ei,o,u’ actions (accelerations, energy feeding, information processing, reproduction of an offspring and evolution of individuals into universals) into a single function:

Max. ExI (s=t), as we maximise a product when both element (e≈ and i≈t) are equal (so 10=5+5=6+4=3+7->5×5>6×4>7×3).

This function of existence, that maximises the connection between limbs and heads, fields and particles, through a balanced body-wave, in which space=time, magnetic=electric field, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, ‘golden mean rules’ apply, is the resume of it all. “grow and multiply’, maximise your existence, ‘be a vital being, feed, perceive, reproduce socialise≈love your clone’. And in any language we express, physical equations of quantum complementarity and thermodynamic equilibrium and steady state speed, balance between vital constants of a body, justice of a social organism, between its linguistic and working classes, sustainability, etc. is the RULE OF SURVIVAL, which all systems strive to obey.

It means that the being with maximal momentum in physics, maximal top predator force (in body and mind), or higher degree of energy and information in human individuals will come on top and survive in collision with other physical systems, darwinian events of hunting and predation and social struggle for power.

The vital properties of Universal fractals: super organisms performing world cycles of existence.

So the fractal structure of the Universe is organic. Basically you exist in a Universe of social organic, fractal points, reproducing their information and self-organising into larger more complex structures.

The Universe thus is made of vital fractals, systems that reproduce their information emitting ‘seeds’ in a lower scale (forces, in physical systems, genetic seminal cells in biological systems, memetic objects and ideas in sociological systems), which will reproduce and self-organise into clone wholes.

So the purpose of the Universe is bio-logical, since the creation of Nature’s fractal organisms of ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’ is exactly the same program of existence, we anthropocentric wo=men define only for ourselves and similar life beings: to absorb=feed on energy, and gauge information, mixing both to reproduce fractal ‘radiations’ of clone beings, which then evolve socially into larger wholes of the 5th dimension.

And the structure is ternary, made of points that enact the program, surrounded by a vital body-wave, and enclosed by a temporal, informative membrane.

In the conclusion of this introduction we will summarise the fundamental consequence of the unity of all beings of the Universe made of vital space with entropic motions, and cyclical vortices of time, with ordering, informative properties.

The very essence of the Universe and all its parts is to be made of vital space and cyclical time and share the properties of those 2 substances and its infinite body-wave combinations. Now this statement simplifies enormously the understanding of ‘first principles of all beings’, which can be easily be derived of those systems. Essentially, when we get to the basics, why we live and die, why we have the form we have, why we exist, perceive, feed on energy, reproduce, love, evolve socially, etc. we shall find that all of them come from an essential, underlying game of topological combination, evolution and social organisation of quanta of space ordered by sequential time cycles.

The result of studying the naked properties and combining rules of this ‘yin and yang’ of scientific content, time and space, information and energy, which combine to give birth to the infinite beings in existence has an enormous potential to enlighten our comprehension of the Universe and become integrated within it. The only drawback is to anthropomorphism and the myth that we are at the centre of reality and matter more than other beings, because we are made of a special substance (soul and mind in earlier religions, carbon-atoms, which seemed to hold some virtual magic in modern religions of science) None of it is truth, and objective science consists precisely in put mankind outside the realm of privileges.

So one the problem of putting all those insights together, and make with them a  bio-logic, formal mathematical model of the organic, fractal Universe my experience is that the residence to the model is mostly philosophical (as the details are not fully worked out, as any initial field still in flux, it is only a question of time and new researchers that the model is connected with all the equations of all sciences): are we humans, able to accept our objective, absolutely relative position in the Time period, space region and scale of reality? Because that is where we are.

This is a consequence on the advance in our understanding of the 3 elements of all realities, space, time and scale, which have now not a single absolute content:

On one side the existence of multiple fractal space at different scales, makes the human scale relativity. On the other the existence for each scale of different rhythms and bits of time, make our speed of time also relative, slower than that of genes, atoms and chips, faster than that of larger plants and planets.

Only a relative order then makes sense of this scalar, multiple space-time Universe, which is what the fifth dimension and  its ‘formal mathematical metric equation’, provides.

As it relates all those scales, in an orderly fashion. So we can translate the time rhythms and space size, and space-time actions of any species of each scale of that fractal Universe – that is, we can synchronize parts and larger wholes, study its exchanges of energy and information, and how they create larger networks, and how the process of growth and decay are vital processes – since we have to study NOT merely a fractal, mathematical structure, as those of artistic, computer-generated Mandelbrot like fractals, but vital fractals, living beings, who constantly reproduce their forms in smaller and larger scales, as you, a vital fractal does, when emitting a smaller seed of your information that reproduces and grows and organises a larger whole.

Let us be clear from the beginning, Nature’s fractals are living fractals that reproduce in smaller and larger scales creating smaller seeds of information and larger social wholes joined by networks. So the key to understand beyond the mathematical elements the fractal structure of the Universe is a concept that scientists, schooled only in the ‘mathematical method’ shy away from: the concept of a fractal super organism in space. And the world cycle of life and death of existence that those fractal super organisms experience as they reproduce in a lower scale of reality, organise themselves emerging as individuals and become part of larger social wholes. 

This we shall describe with mathematical equations when required, corresponding with all the known laws of science, but what is the essence of the new paradigm is ‘organicism’, the vital, organic, reproductive properties of fractals. In mathematics we describe this properties with an iterative ‘Fractal Generator’. Nature is essentially the same but its fractal generators are obviously more complex. Your seminal seed is a fractal generator of a being like you. Your mental memes, your ideas, if you are a prophet and innovator will become the fractal generator of an astounding number of similar beings. A black hole is often a fractal generator that catalyses the reproduction of stars.
This is then the fundamental philosophical novelty of a fractal structure: it is NOT a mechanism but an organism.

For that reason, the science that studies its general laws is NOT physics, vitiated by its dislikeness of organic properties but a new science called complexity or general systems science, of which Hawking rightly said it will be the science of the XXI C.

Since as our collection of scientific data grows in complexity that organic nature of all beings becomes evident. First it became evident in mathematical terms, with those fractal mappings.

What this blog adds is the entire philosophy of science behind it – the organic philosophy of fractal beings – and apply it to describe every species of the Universe, which will show to be ultimately a self-reproductive biological system, as mathematics is also a social, realist language, which accurately describes the fractal structure of the Universe, made of ‘points’ that reproduce into ‘networks’, which grow into ‘wholes’, which becomes ‘points’ of a new scale of reality.

So the Universe builds layer upon layer and scale upon scale of its quanta of space and time into larger super-organisms, from forces into particles that gather into atoms that gather into molecules that gather into cells and matter, that gather into multicellular organisms and giant crystals and societies and cosmic bodies and societies of galaxies called stars, which gather into networks of galaxies called Universes.

Existential algebra. Temporal formalism: Max. ∆E x I 

If the ternary topological being describes all the evolutions of information in time of super organisms, and as such represents the final stage of geometry or mathematics of space, algebra, the mathematics of time requires also an adaptation to fractal 5d space-time.]

It is then the quest for an equation of 5D, which represents the events of its space-time domain in the clearest, most synoptic form.

We have call that expression the function of existence and it is the most useful equation to generate the systems of the Universe and hence resume all other equations.

Its study is the field of ¬æ Algebra or existential algebra (ab. Ælgebra, ¬Æ).

Why that equation resumes the Universe in its quantum form of universal actions (it is an obvious discrete function depending on which e and i family of numbers we choose) is obvious: it resumes the actions of the Universe:

Max. E = feeding, Max. I = informing, Max. e x i = reproducing Max. ∆ (eusocial evolution into wholes) =Max.∑ x Max. ∏.

SO WE COMPLETE the evolution of topology with the evolution of algebra, which we define as:

‘the study of how scales of social evolution of a super organism, observed in classic algebra as groups, rings and other algebraic structures, develop its world cycle of existence through a series of zero sum actions of absorption and emission of energy and information’.

Of the main sub-functions of the function of existence, the world cycle developed here through 3 states and ages is a fundamental one.

THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE IS THE ULTIMATE KNOTS AND BOLTS OF THE UNIVERSE, ITS STUDY BY EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA THE HIGHEST FORMALISM OF STIENCES. Alll what we do all beings is really performing parts and wholes of those functions, its cycles and derivative actions.

Actions connect all the elements and networks of the ∆o being with ∆±4 scales.

In the next graph we show a human organism constructed with 3 topologies, which always will be the only 3 topologies of the Universe, cyclical-informative centres, lineal, toroid larger space-boundaries and an intermediate territory of hyperbolic form:

HUMAN ACTIONS

In the graphs we see the 3 ages of time and 3 topologies of space, which become pegged into space-time organic parts in each being, which will then perform actions, dominant in energy or information according to that organic pegging. In the graph we see the human being born of that pegging, which performs the canonical motions-actions possible in all space-time beings.

In the lower graph we show man, a space-time being made of lineal energy and cyclical, temporal information, assembled in 3 parts, through cellular networks specialised in energy feeding, informative perception and reproduction, and the 3 ages of life between birth in a lower seminal scale and extinction. We write below the logic formalism that describes with simple equations of 5D space-time the organic parts in space and temporal ages of the human super-organism, the same equations we shall use to describe all systems of the Universe.

Finally, in the bottom, we see the decomposition of the worldcycle of existence of a human being into a sum of infinite actions, which together form THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE, the fundamental ‘detailed’ equation of each species of the Universe.

The connection of the being through its fractal ∆±4 actions as entity which:

∆-1:  reproduces through lower cells/atoms (organism, crystals etc)

∆-2: feeds in smaller quanta (amino-acids, electronic energy in physical crystals)

∆-3: perceives even smaller pixels for its mind languages (¥-rays in mankind and crystal’s images)

∆-4: moves over a space relatively infinite in speed distance, since it is invisible in information: V=s/tiƒ=s/0=∞ (non-local gravitational action at distance).

And alternately becomes just an ∆-1 element of its super organism (species, society or ecosystem) immersed in an ∆-2 world/planetary system itself a mere cell of the larger galactic cosmos…

It follows then that both societies and species are super organisms of individual cells/citizens, which will show to go also through 3 ages or ‘horizons’ of evolution with the same structure than any other system (hence species are enclosed as an ∆+1 scale in ‘time’ of the individual life world cycle).

If the how of science is established by the topological structure in space of the 3 arrows of time and its 3 sub-organs, which construct all systems of nature, the why is the Algebra of Existence, which studies the function of space-time actions, which entities perform to ‘exist’, and survive in the universe of energy and information.

In the next graph we observe those elements on the human function of existence, which resumes all what reality is about – the creation of fractal ternary beings with the 3 topologies of space, which perform during its 3 ages of time, each one dominated by one of those topological energetic/digestive, reproductive/blood and informative/neuronal networks, a series of actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, reproduced whenever is possible in other region of space-time, or evolved socially into bigger wholes, with a single purpose to survive, to exist:

What the function of existence as a sum of infinitesimal number of actions of space-time, absorbing and emitting energy and information, ±∆e, i, combining it into reproductive seminal seeds of the whole, e x i, and associating it into social scales, allows is the description of the whys of the larger world cycles and ensembles that form the super organism in space and its time cycle.

Its discovery by this author, exposed at the 50th Anniversary of the foundation of Systems Sciences society at Sonoma Congress, was the first step in the construction of the so long seeked, logic and mathematical formalism of General Systems theory (ab. GSΤ, which means both, general systems theory, the philosophy of the organic Universe, and Generator of space-time, its formalism), based in 3 structural concepts that lay at the bottom of reality: cyclical clocks of time, lineal motions of space, and a 5th scalar dimension, ‘∆’ that can enclose them all: ∆SΤ±∞.

So we add the concept of a scalar Universe to complete our new principle of conservation of energy and information:

‘All what exists is a system made of lineal, spatial, entropic, energy fields, Spe, and cyclical, temporal, clocks information, Τiƒ, which transforms into each other ad eternal: Spe < = > Τiƒ, co-existing in 3 organic scales of size, ∆±1 in which it reproduces by emitting a seminal seed in the lower scale, ∆-1, which will iterate and organise itself emerging as a new whole that ensures the immortalilty of its ‘logic form’:

Γ = (Spe x Tiƒ)∆±1′

For that reason because the equation of any Universal system or ‘superoganism’, Γ, generates a self-reproductive fractal Universe, with infinite systems of space-time, constantly being created and destroyed, I called the equation, the ‘fractal feed-back generator’ of the Universe. In its limit, when we consider a single ‘plane of space-time of the scalar fifth dimension, and simplify it to consider only energy, it becomes the principle of conservation of energy, which however is a too simple description to fully account for all the knowledge we have acquired since the founding father of physics, established its principles of lineal motion and entropy, 2 centuries ago.

So the ultimate question about our actions is the program of survival:

Indeed. Why we keep on living? Most are mere automatons that move, reproduce, live, without understanding they follow a program of existence and survival. But those who reflect will agree we live because we enjoy the pleasure of motion, attached to all lineal, entropic ‘free’ expansions; and also the slightly painful pressure of in-form-ation and awareness. So we must attach to the purest 2 elements of reality, ‘motion’ and ‘information’, the psychic, sensorial properties of ‘pain and pleasure’. And again to fit them we need the co-existence of those planes, from where ‘those sensations might emerge’. Indeed, pain is pressure, pressure is in-form-ation, gravitational force, and so that ‘sensation’ must arise ultimately from the lowest scales of co-existence. So the scalar Universe has attached to each external plane, certain internal sensations. And those we can only postulate, if we accept the properties of those 4 elements, st, •, ∆ and specially the co-existence of multiple layers of organisation.

The reader then can scratch part of it, as quantum physicists do, denying the pilot-wave theory (that is the lower faster scale of space which entangles particles and guides them), the survival why of collapsing waves (which as all herds, collapse into tighter configuration when ‘attacked’ by a huge electron bombing them), the ‘advanced level of information of smaller scales’, shown in the amazing capacity to process information of entangled, quantum particles (qbits), and so many other elements which are philosophical, not physical, informative not energetic, happening in invisible time regions (as we only see quanta of presents) not in a single instant. 

EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.

We shall not unlike in topology and analysis go through the development of classic algebra in this blog, though in the part dedicated to mathematics and its 3 ages we shall bring some of those themes. Our interest, in a Universe in which there are constantly 3 choices of path to act or no act with equal probabilities is to map out the new existential algebra (ab. Æ) of all nature systems, with those 3 possibilities.

Temporal, Æxistential Algebra, studies the organisation of systems, through time=change; that is by means of transformations that provoke motions of a system, and create variations of systems, according to Group theory.

What we are interested here, beyond explaining the laws of algebra, translated to TSymmetries and ∆-scales, is the nature of existential algebra and the differen equations of motions which always render a certain:

Past < Operandi> Future = present. We shall consider in this introdution the main operandi of the 7 motions of the Universe of which the 3 more important are Past ± Future = Present (superposition classic of the motion of a wave), Past x Future = Present

(Product, normally of space and time different states) and Pastˆfauture = ∆+1: social evolutionary arrow of future across the ∆-dimension.

So the study of the generator equation, the existential function, and the different motions that move across ∆St• a system, and its different ‘classic operandi’, translating the main operations of classic algebra to meaningful cyclical space-time actions, are the concerns of existential algebra, which does not start with ‘set theory’ and ‘undefined Hilbert’s methods’ of truth, but rather taking it from experience through GST ternary causality.

The selfish mind-point.

The key to all this is thus a non-Æ multiple ternary space-time structure of causality, which simply speaking the mind will always reject with its @ristotelian simplification. So we are not even aware of the last of those ternary diversifications, in this case the mind view.

Since we have 3 relative ‘scales’ and p.o.v. of being:

-1 as • dust, mere fractal points of finitesimal existence.

-2  as @-mind which maps out the universe from its organic perspective

-3 as œ island-ûniverse, a supœrganism closed into itself.

So we use for minds 3 symbols of ‘scale’, •,@ & œ, since they are indeed nothing for a higher plane o existence, self-centred, p@articles, from its mind-point of view, and ‘complementary organic E-nergy body-waves attached to cyclical, informative O-particles: Œ’ from the perspective of the higher level of awareness, of the whole in the ∆+1 plane of existence.

As i said minds that are fully ‘fixed’ into an abstract, locomotion view of reality will fully disregard this content. To me this attitude only shows the enormous shortcomings of a fixed ‘scientific mind’ automaton of the rules of the method, see, measure, put in an equation and affirm all that matters is in that equation, because God speak mathematics (albeit of a human lower logic) and to ask why ‘god’ is mathematical and nothing else is a blasphemous question.

So we conclude that all what exists is a fractal point, which seen in maximal detail appears as a super organism performing a world cycle, whose inner parts are structured as cells of the 3 Se<Ts>Tƒ networks of the higher entity. Existence in a Universe of infinite Points of View, Œ, means that we co-exist with at least 2 main infinitesimal and infinite planes of existence, that of our cellular parts and the social world in which we live. Thus we are always at the same time:

  • A cell of a larger social body
  • An organism that tries to survive playing the game of space-time åctions, ∫∂(±∆e,i)dt ds=WU∆±1. that is as an organism we shall make a series of infinitesimal exchanges of energy and information, ∂e,i, which will be sequentially integrated into a world cycle of our U±∆ organism.
  • And finally a super organism or ‘relative God’ as a point of view that controls its territory.

Those 3 points of view from above and below and within ∆±1 become then converted into partial definitions of a system from different points of view. But only when we consider ALL the outsider and inside perspectives of the being we can reach full knowledge of it.

As we are all dust of space-time, but also individual organic mind-selfs and Gods of our internal island-Universe.

.Ælgebra: Existential Algebra, multiple causality, the equation of time states.

Now, existential algebra does not fit easily in classic algebra. Sorry, of course, there are elements of algebra, notably group theory and polynomials which will be also at the core of our understanding of space-time, but the 3 fundamental equations of Existential Algebra, are NOWHERE TO BE SEEN in previous science, and so the main content on Existential algebra will be quite new. Let us recap those 3 equations, which ultimately are the same one – equations of the symmetries of space-time:

  • Γenerator equation: ∆-1 |-Spe (Past-Limbs/fields/territory)<Ø-St (Present-body-waves-working class)>O-Tiƒ (Future-head-particle) ∆+1

The generator equation writes the 3 elements of topological beings in space, which are symmetric to the 3 ages of time, and belong to each of the 3 co-existing scales of the super organism, since the field-territory provides energy, which is dissolved backwards to produce the entropy of motion for the body-head system, the super organism proper: Tƒ<EXI=ST

This dual complementary system thus exists in ∆, where the body-wave reproduces the system; while the head-particle is somewhat as the residence of the mind who sees the system as a whole, the minimal ∆+1 unit of an external world.

  • Existential function: To<Exi≤S≈T

The reader will observe the existential equation is the generator written as an acronym, which ‘magic – i didn’t do it’ writes in english as the verb To Exist, which is indeed the proper function of existence that all beings play, through its 3 parts, the To-head particle, the Exi- body-wave and the S=T field. This is truly a magic function, which resumes as a sum of actions of exchange of energy and information what beings do to survive. To exist, is to feed with energy and information your body-wave (ex i) extracted from the entropy of the field, S=T And IMPRINTED by the logic forms of  your To-head. The function though is MORE than a mere acronym of the generator equation, since we can indeed consider that all systems follow a simple mandate of survival: to maximise its function of existence, which written in a more proper way expresses the actions of space-time of all beings:

Will of survival                                                Max. ∑ e x i (s=t)

This apparently simple equation is at the heart of reality. As all systems made of 3 parts, will constantly emit and absorb energy and information, ±∆e, i, through its body-heads, wave-particles in order to survive, and will try to reproduce both (Exi) through those body-waves, which is a function, maximised when e=i (9×1<8×2-7×3).

So systems will have a balance between its energy and information networks, (mens sana in corpore sanum), and will constantly strive to replenish its energy and information, extracted from a lower field, made of smaller parts, which will also be in balance (S=t), between its components of entropy and curvature-form. Further on, they will try to evolve socially, ∑, to maximise the survival and size in space and synchornicity in time of the system.

So for every system we shall find a similar equation which will explain the actions of the being, explained quantitatively for physical systems (and a fascinating adventure of the mind is to express physical quantum equations in terms of the function of existence and the actions of space-time of all beings, so for example the 4 quantum numbers as the 4 letters of genetics, express mainly one of those 4 fundamental actions (energy feeding and locomotion, 1st number, gauging of information, 2nd number, reproduction, spin number, and social evolution, magnetic number)

While in life beings, the equation resumes the 4 drives of existence (feeding, informing, reproducing evolving socially), which therefore are common to all survival beings. And also the top predator function of a system (max. ∑e xi, will be a top predator in all contacts, in physical systems akin to the maximal momentum, which wins the collisions between physical systems).

  • Equation of time arrows; Past-entropy (fields limbs) x Future Information (particles-heads) = Present space-time body wave.

The 3rd equation of Existential Algebra  is the one which requires a more thorough new perspective, as the existence of 3 causal arrows of future, completely changes the ‘rules of logic’ underlying algebra.

First and obvious this equation means that when information is transferred it might happen in a motion to the past: Information<Entropy; in the fractal inner region in which it is happening.So death is just a process of massive erasing of information and travel to the past.

Second, and also obvious, what it matters, present is made of combination of 2 simultaneous arrows, which are complementary and converge in a single point. So the usual single causality does not work.

i-logic CREATION VS. DESTRUCTION

The 5Dimotions of the Universe enhance and reconnect man’s mind to the entangled Universe.

But to that aim we have to use the fundamental pentalogic elements of reality, mind, space, time, scale and the entropic destruction, and apply the isomorphic properties derived of those 5 elements and its ‘dynamic’ expression as dimotions.

Expanding our knowledge of any event and form, reducing the chaos, projecting better our understanding of the blocks of time that shape the future as each super organism has a set path of existence (albeit, it can manipulate the speed of its dimotions and even for truly experts in the art of exist¡ences halt by repetition the process of aging, themes those of certain finesse studied in other posts). In brief, we MUST ad NEW elements to the scientific method and as usual given the growth of complexity required we try at least to use a mnemonic pentadimensional rule to it, what I have called ¬Æxistential Algebra, or ¬A(bcd)E stientific method:

We shall as usual cast its structure from the perspective of the enhanced ‘ABCDE‘ Principles of the Scientific method, which ads the properties of scalar space and cyclical time (Ðisomorphisms), the B-iological, organic models derived of it, and the Non-AE structure that results of the multiple nature of time-space dimotions to the classic elements:
 A-ccurate Data, C-orrespondence Principle with proved models and E-xperimental method that allows to hypothesize and predict the future of the species studied.
To make things ‘simpler’ the 3 ad-ons to ‘Data-Correspondence-Experimental method’ caused by cyclical time and fractal space, which are non-Æ: i-logic geometry, organic, Biological models and Disomorphisms, are wraped up in the Disomorphic method (a dynamic analysis of the system as it is generated by a seed of information, emerges as a super organism and lives a world cycle) or a shorter version – the analysis of the system through its 5 CAUSAL DIMENSIONS-ACTIONS-MOTION, or  ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple truths.
The reader of course has a mind schooled in the single causality of lineal Aristotelian time, A->B and the shallow geometry of Euclidean lineal dimensions. So for him it might seem unneeded to fully search for 5 Dimotions-actions-points of view in the analysis of any event to discover the minimal causality of its existence, but that is precisely the huge handicap of huminds doing science – little-big egos jumping up ‘me, I an myself has the only answer.
Not so: to explain anything in the entangled Universe you need the confluence of at least 3 ‘topological elements/timespace forms  in a single plane of existence, 3±¡ planes that influence the event from above and below and the whole, and if we were to fully grasp the event, its past-present and future states as a block of time.
So then, there wouldn’t be the absurd clash of egos between scholars each one studying a ceteris paribus cause of the polidimensional Universe and saying this IS the only cause.
If I only could erase that ceteris paribus plague of egocy (ego+idiocy) proper of the humind and teach the multiplicity of perspectives, it might be possible to expand your understanding and belonginess to the Universe and the World with which you are connected.
 So for each article, we must consider AT LEAST the perspectives of those ∆±i scales and the 3 topologies of the ‘central plane’, ∆ø, where the event happens as a whole. This bare minimum (as the full blown understanding requires all the information of the past-preent-future world cycle block of time of the entity or event), implies to consider reality from the point of view of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe; as the entangled Universe always requires to understand reality from those 5 relative Topological Dimensions with motion=Dimotions=Actions of space & time to fully account for the simultaneous, multiple perspectives of reality.
So the ‘original’ two steps of the scientific method get more complex.
The first step – collection of accurate data now should include all those ‘subtle’ flows of information and energy that come into the event – for example in Physics flows coming from other scales as in the Kondo Effect; in our daily life, the burdens imposed by the ∆+1 state or world in which we exist.
Then when modeling- to find a causal explanation for an event – we cannot do ceteris paribus, or rather we should at least do 5Dimotional analysis of the 5 converging ‘elements’ of the being, NEVER existing as an isolate.
Finally if we are establishing the most abstract level of modeling – that of T.œ, theoretical extraction of general laws from a given spacetime event/being, according to the disomorphic nature of reality – i.e. to find for example that limbs/potentials of entropy have lineal/flat topologies, as the fastest/shortest distance between 2 points, we shall search for experimental evidence, NOT only as in classic thought within the restricted species we study but in the 3 great sub disciplines of human thought, Physical, biological and soci0-economic systems. So we shall indeed find forces to be flat electromagnetic perpendicular planes in physical systems; wings to be flat and triangular in biology, and flat and triangular in socio-economic planes; as they are all ultimately ‘topological forms’ that keep emerging in new planes of space.
So this ABCDE mnemonic rule will allow us to study with a much more complex view, far more exhaustive and explanative, and at the same time far more relative, the reality that surrounds it.
And finally when all this is ideally done (please don’t expect me to do it all by myself, at this age, alone… this blog, we shall not cease to repeat is my attempt before my many sickness send me packing into Nirvana of leaving a ‘trace’ in the sand of thought, for others to build better structured castles)… as an appendix, we try to write ALL OF IT, with the ‘warped’ package of non-Æ i-logic equations.
So we get the FULL ¬A(bcd)Extraction of all the knowledge huminds can get of the being, which of course will NOT be all, as only the being has all the information into its self.

The formalism of the fractal ∆§t±¡ universe is I-logic Geometry and ¬Ælgebra (existential Algebra), the 2 most used terms to describe the topo-logic structure of a Universe of fractal spaces and temporal energy. Existential Algebra is my favorite term, for all what has to do with the symbolic equations of non-Æ, I-logic geometry. So those are the wor(l)ds of most often used. ¬Æ, the best abbreviation.

The equations of ¬Æ are those of Dimotions of time§paces.

For example, V=s/t is a ¬Æ equation, which we must interpret better in terms of Ðimotions as:

Constant lineal inertia (motion) = $(λ) x ƒð = K

A case of the most general Metric of all possible time space demotions, ‘SxT’=K.

How many times of equation of Ðimotions of space-time there are, how much are related to the fractal generator, as all of them are sub-cases of the generator, how to connect them with the equation and laws of each science is the formalism of the stience of exist¡ences.

In terms of language it means as each of those dimotions is better studied with a certain language of the humind that we need to ad to the mathematical languages, verbal, logic languages, and bio-logical, organic ones; and finally metaphysical sentient/sensation-related concepts, which of course, the ceteris paribus egocy of scholars will shun off. Each humind has its own egocy perspective and we deal with that in our analysis of the equation of the mind, an infinitesimal mirror of still forms that believe to be infinite. 
So that is the future of stience, in any planet in which similar huminds have kept expanding our connection with the entangled Universe.
This post will deal with the more formal elements of reality, Non-Æxistential algebra proper that considers how reality for each being is generated out of the 5 dimotions of its whole, within the 5 Dimotions of its world, with special emphasis on the complex I-logic causality of all realities.

CONCLUSION:  ¡T.Œ:

CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE. EPISTEMOLOGY: WE ARE ALL FRACTAL SPACE-TIME BEINGS

‘A new theory should reproduce the results of older well-established theories (which become limiting cases) in those domains where the old theories work.’ Wiki, Correspondence Principle

‘Simplex 4D physics is a case of 5D Fractal space & cyclical time, limited to a single, mechanical time clock and a single ∆-scale of space.’ L.S.

T.œ: A Theory of the Organic Everything

So as you can see in this ‘small picture’ on some details of the laws that structure the scales of the Universe, the new paradigm will completely alter the way humans define social sciences too… if humans accept the unity of the whole Universe and its laws before their absurd arrogance and blindness to those laws of life, love and death take them to the tomb.

This blog is the blueprint for the only real philosophy of science which respecting the laws of the scientific method can unify all disciplines of knowledge, with very simple laws that integrate all other theories of science, following the 4 main proofs of veracity in science:

  • Correspondence with all other theories, either included as limiting cases, or properly explained by the new model.
  • Experimental evidence of all systems co-existing in fractal scales, of all its topologies being only of the 3 organic varieties explained here, of all ages in time, corresponding to the 3 arrows studied here
  • Simplicity and economicity: Occam.’s razor.
  • Fallibility, as it does explain it all it should be easy to find exceptions, which becomes riddles for further research (-:
  • Predictability, as the model has done in sciences never clearly predicted before (history and economics)

And so GST capacity to explain the maximal number of entities and events with the minimal quantity of elements and laws, Vmakes GST the only serious candidate to a theory of everything:

We shall ab. T.œ, using the symbol œ of an organism of space (e) and time (o), to differentiate it from T.O.E. the much more restricted concept of physics, whose Theory Of Everything, really searches only for the previous Unification Equation of charges and masses, we have resolved earlier to avoid further discussion about what Theory is more important, The Physicist’s theory of Unification, which they have never found despite being so trivial as we have shown to be; and the T.Œ of philosophy of stiences of this blog, which will explain truly everything that you have ever thought of, including seemingly so scientific terms as religions, art and any other endeavour of the human experience.

So what we have said  is only a first step in an adventure of the mind, which will truly change the ‘stiences’ of the III millennium… advancing, harmonising and explaining further all previous theories according to the correspondence Principle, with previous theories of time space, which in encompasses, corrects and enlarge.

∆-scales: 5D SCALAR NETWORKS OF SPATIAL ENERGY & TEMPORAL INFORMATION.

T. Œ; the homologic method of truths. 

In the graph GST.œ describes an organic, fractal Universe made of systems of space-time constructed with three topological dimensions of space, symmetric to three ages/functions of time, which form co-existing supœrganisms, across several scales of size and speed of time clocks.
T.Œ, a ‘Theory Of Everything organic’,  based in the rediscovery of cyclical time clocks, a concept, so obvious in Nature and the systems of time measure, which in the Eastern world was the basis of its religious philosophies of the Universe (Taoism and Hinduism) and in the West was natural to the Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek tradition, followed by Leibniz and his concept of relational space-time, of a Universe made of ‘fractal, vital spaces’ (the entities we see all around us), which lasted a finite time cycle (its cycle of creation, evolution and extinction).

All in all we realise that fractal space-time leads to the organic paradigm, which requires:

T: Cyclical time – multiple clocks with different volumes of information.

S: Moving energetic space – lineal entropic motions, and its hyperbolic, wave-like combinations…

∆: Happening across social scales of relative size, the 5th scalar dimension of space-time.

•@ And all this warped up and perceived in stillness by an informative mind

4 elements which create put together, infinite ‘finite’ space-time beings, including you, me, the computer you see, the chair you seat and everything else:

∞ ∆• ST beings…

So we shall start with a tempo ‘forte’ enough for you to dismiss either the blog, or the absurd subjective traps of ego-centered human beliefs, because we anticipate you are ‘nothing but dust of space-time’; and few men can really ‘stand’ that objective scientific reality, which not only takes you out of the centre of motions in space (Copernicus, Einstein), and motions in time (evolution of form) but also of motion in scale (Absolute relativity, as we shall find all scales of the Universe, from the tiniest atom, akin to the largest galaxy; have the same relative content of entropy, energy and information), when ‘reduced’ with 5D metric to the ‘constancy of existence: Spe x Tiƒ = ∆º.

 

The 4 elements of the organic universe: lineal space, cyclical time, linguistic minds and fractal scales.

This ‘dualist’ philosophy of science will then turn out to be a more complex alternative philosophy of science, which has been with us since the earlier dualist philosophies of the eastern world (taoism, hinduism) entered Europe through German philosophy and is at the heart of multiple key laws of nature, from the Principle of complementarity of quantum physics to the hegelian duality of social doctrines of history to the duality body-mind of biological systems.

To that eternal duality of ‘ST’ space and time (which we shall show to be equivalent to entropy and form), we need to ad though 2 elements completely ignored by classic eastern philosophies, but at the heart of western science.

The problem of the mind (ab. • or @) that perceives the ‘whole’ Universe from an infinitesimal point of view, through a language that bias reality to fit it into the brainl and so the problem of epistemology and truth, and experience and its limits…

And the question of an scalar, fractal Universe, (ab. ∆) in which there are ‘different co-existing planes of being’, parts and wholes, as you for example co-exist as a system of atoms, molecules, cells, organs and you are part of a larger whole world.

So the new ‘paradigm’ of a Universe dominated by information NOT by motion and entropy needs 4 fundamental upgradings to convert ‘science’ into ‘stience’:

  • The understanding of fractal space and cyclical time (ST)
  • Of the mind and the logic syntax of the language we use to ‘reduce’ the total information o the Universe (∆º, ø-mind)
  • And the scales of the ‘5th dimension of planes of space-time co-existing in all systems and organisms, (∆).
  • All together we write the 4 components of all systems: ∆øST. And affirm the Universe is made of ‘dust of space-time’…

We shall therefore develop with those four elements, ∆•ST, the only formal, logico-mathematical model of general systems sciences which upgrades all disciplines with the laws of duality – the study of the Universe with 2 arrows of time and its ‘present combinations’. Since we shall soon find to fully make account of all those universal systems we will have also to upgrade the 2 formal languages of science, concerning space (mathematics) and time (logic causality).

As the new unit of maths will be the ‘fractal non-euclidean point’ which becomes larger as we come to it, revealing an entire internal world; and the new logic of time will not be single, one-dimensional, Aristotelian in its causality but use 3 arrows of time, entropy, information and its energetic combinations to describe a much more complex ‘fine structure to reality’, which paradoxically as we build from such dust of space-time all other entities, will show ultimately to ‘produce much simpler, homologic, self-similar beings’ all of us…

We call this upgrading of mathematics and logic, ¬æ, as it is ‘non-aristotelian and non-euclidean’, or ‘i-logic mathematics’ as i comes after a-e, and certainly the wonders of a world ruled by information, so deeply misunderstood by the bias towards energy of centuries of ‘mechanical science’, are ‘spooky’ and strange enough to seem i-logic to the simple mind.

Or rather as saint Augustine said of God’s mind, which he call ‘the seer of time’, of ‘a logic higher than man’, since as Plato put it, ‘the whole cosmos is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called logos’…

In that regard, if we were to make a ‘hierarchy of stiences’ we shall put first GST, as it tries by all means to understand the complex i-logic of the mind of the Universe,which is above humans and its Æ-languages; thne i-logic mathematics, the ¬Æ upgrading of space-time ‘stiences’; next all the others as all scales follow the same isomorphic laws; of which a hierarchy must therefore establish on the grounds of proximity to humans, the observers, as errors of perception diminish near our ∆0 mind-point; plus what we learn about man in medicine and history  help us (so those are the queens of all stiences as it deals with our survival as individuals and societies).

On the limit, curiously enough, as today it is heralded as the ‘king of all knowledge’, the ‘manly’, entropy only theories of ‘fantaphysics’, which is astoundingly biased in favor of ‘entropy=death arrows’, has a worldly religion to make weapons that kill man, has the maximal uncertainty of observation, deals with invisible remote scales that matter nothing to us, and so it is irrelevant (string theory), dangerous (nuclear physics beyond the level of known-known particles) and plainly false (SUSY, evaporation of black holes, 2nd law of thermodynamics and its arrow of only entropy in a dead Universe)…

So after giving you so many revelations of the true structure of reality we must do a bit of ‘contra physicist’ and debunk many of the myths and falsehoods of lineal science that drag on and prevent the evolution of our knowledge of reality…

The errors of lineal Time as entropy≈locomotion.

Now, as today there is a queen of philosophy of science, called ‘physics’, which is full of… well, ‘errors’ of thought as philosophy. And the biggest error is the pretentious priesthood of quantum physicists who ‘believe’ their scale of size and time clocks is more important than all others, which they try to explain in terms of its laws and jargons. FACT though is that in the fractal paradigm, all scales of reality follow the same laws (quantum physics through the Bohm-Broglie pilot-wave interpretation recently proved by the EM engine, which adds the ‘particle-polar’ field-position (Spe>Tiƒ) state to the wave state completing quantum physics according to the 5th dimensional paradigm, so we shall of course describe quantum physics and its 3 elements, with our generator equation also: quantum potential (spe) < Schrodinger wave (St)>Particle (tiƒ). )

This means there is no hierarchy and physics is not more important, but less than organic medicine because we can see better a human being, plus medicine has clear positive consequences for our species and so biology and history, the stiences of man as fractal organism and mankind in space, history in time as our global species-superorganism become the new queen stiences; while non-Aristotelian logic and Non-euclidean mathematics NOT physics, become the foundational stiences of space-time.

So we shall r=evolve science from its inception, by improving the 2 languages of knowledge, maths and logic to better reflect as a mind mirror, the multiplicity of worlds there are in the Universe. 

Since earlier attempts to compromise and merely ‘adapt’ classic sciences to the new laws of information and the ‘program or algorithm’ of the Universe were dull and ‘perpetuated’ the errors of simplex science  and æ-languaes, dedicated to study only one of the many type motions of the Universe, the simplex one, locomotion, and pretending it is all what really matters about reality.

®lgebra

All this said the 2 highest moments of this constant 30 years orgasm of communion with the Universe and its mind languages, I have experienced have been the understanding of the mind-languages≈Universal languages connection, through the 2 highest expressions of the human mind, objective mathematics, and subjective art (where man strives to reach its maximal perception of the whole through verbal-logic-time languages/literature/poetry/laws/ethics and visual-artistic-spatial forms).

So the reader should excuse me if I have been considered for most of my life a painter-writer-film maker. But truly beyond human subjective expression nothing equals the pleasures of understanding the laws of vital mathematics, expressed through its temporal and scalar disciplines, ∆nalysis and algebra. So this blog will not be completed till christmas 2017 when i complete the section on vital mathematics, the final ‘crown’ of the blog. Topology, Group Theory and Analysis will then show to be truly the most perfect mirror of the Universe.

And the key of course is the existence of more than one times=changes=motions and the way they form causal chains of discontinuous beats, such as: 

  • The reproductive stop to feed on energy-and-go: S-t-s
  • THE beat of perceiving information in stillness-reproducing it through motion: st-t-st-t
  • The beat of reproduction, social evolution, reproduction till emerging in a new scale: st-∆-st-∆

The description in formal GST terms of all the events, creations, evolutions, reproductions and motions of the Universe through those beats is the exhaustive method of FORMALIZATION of this blog.

screen-shot-2017-01-09-at-11-25-28How do we connect this with classic algebra? Mainly through the concept of mirror symmetries and groups. Indeed, consider the cases of mathematical physics, where the ‘allowed particles’ of any physical system are ‘octets’ tailored with group theory and all the possible symmetries and solutions to an equation.   All this works so its truth but nobody understand, to the point that weyl called the whole abstract algebraic formulation of physics ‘the pest of group theory’

Yet since evolution in time is a beat of the simplest motions of space-time;which are always stop and go, evolution of information- reproduction through motion; group theory merely ‘fixes’ into still mental perception those rhythms through the ± directions of those motions in time.

I.e. the simplest group is the Isospin, which differentiates a neutron from a proton according to the ‘cyclical angular time-momentum of the particle called spin. So as spin can turn in different directions, and become expanding or imploding ‘pi’ turns, those allowed variations of GST motions up or down (spin), left or right (parity) and so on are the ‘symmetries’ of a group theory which become ‘different particles’, according to the ‘3+0’allowed paths of future for any system that might increase or diminish its ±∆ST elements.

1oth and zero isomorphism: the integration of all planes of existence, around its zero-point or mind.

So we close the cycle and study in the 10th isomorphism all the planes of existence that the being perceives, centred in its point of view, which for man are the 10 scales from forces to cosmos we are aware of. Since Humans are space-time systems and so they can be described with:

1st isomorphism: A Generator, Existential equation of the type SpTƒ that defines its space-time symmetry between Its:

2-manifold spatial organs, and its 3 motions in time (2nd, 3rd isomorphism illustrated above), which defines the world cycle and structural systems of the human organism.

This world cycle thus is a sum of existential åctions, ±∆(e,i), exchanges of spatial energy (motion) and information (form) between different humans that aggregate into Universals, through its 3 ∆±1 relate planes of existence (cellular, individual and social planes). The dynamic exchanges of the elements of those graphs applied to every system of the Universe gives us the meaning of it. The method we use to study them here is the method of the 10=5 qualitative≈logic + quantitative properties of them all.

As all can be defined by a 1)equation that describes 2) its 3 topological organs, 3) its symmetric 3 motions in time 4) its exchanges  of energy and information with other planes that motivate 5) its 5 survival åctions ordered in its world cycle.

Thus we can consider that all what exists is a ‘function of existence’, of space and time, of energy and information performing motions in the 5th dimension.

The longest integrated sequence of such internal and external motion is a world cycle, which externally can be described in 4D as a worldline, a sum of trajectories in external space. yet for its full description we must include the ‘stop’ moments between motions in which the being performs an action, and the internal motions of the being, which through the sum of those ±∆ exchanges of energy and information will suffer a world cycle of life and death:

182

In the graph, all what exists can be described as a sum across multiple scales of size of motions in the 5th dimension. The type of motions and length of cycles, the relative motion of the being to an external larger world in which it provides åctions for external beings as a relative, O∆-1 infinitesimal point, the inner world controlled by the point in relative still motion to its o-mind with the will to move the whole. All those elements configure its description with the 5+0 isomorphisms of space, time its symmetries, organs and ages, its åctions across 5D planes and the mind-pov which embodies in its logic circuits of linguistic, faster, small time cycles the creation of the future and the game of existence, under its maximizing function:

Max. A = Max  Uw=∫ (∂æ,e,ï,œ,û) ds dt.

This function of existence makes each point of view to maximize its world cycles of existence as a super organisms, Uw, made of a series of åctions of exchange of energy and information, æ,e,ï,œ,û, across its territory in space, ds, and its duration in time, dt, which defines the domain of the Existential function we study.

The sum of åctions of the being is thus existence of the being and carry all the information of it, but we must add those åctions across the 3 relative, ∆-1 cellular/atomic, thermodynamic-organic, ∆+1 social cosmic scales.

And this brief account of man leads of course, to the oth isomorphism,

Since remember, 0 is also a number – the beginning of the new scale, the order of all of them into a single fractal point the isomorphism of the mind.

We have all the elements of reality:

3 Dimension of space, and 3 symmetric ages of time, and 9 planes of scalar space-time, from faster smaller being to larger, slower ones, ruled by the 5th dimension, embedded in a simple equation Sp x Tƒ = ∆±4 which we can also write in a dynamic way as: Sp<=>Tƒ. And the question is rather simple: what do they put together?

Systems, organic systems, either living systems or physical systems or social systems, which are all ruled by the same laws deduced from the properties of those ‘scalar metrics’, those topologies of space and those 3 ages of Time:

QLL

In the graph we can see from above to below, the metrics of the 5th dimension with the speed of clocks and size of 3 scales, the cosmic, galactic human, and cellular scales, and below we can see how it applies to the human being, which perceives 9 scales, has 3 topological networks symmetric to the 3 ages of life between its birth in the ∆-1 seminal scale and the i-ndividual and ∆+1 social scales.

And we could make a similar drawing for every species of the Universe. Hence the concept central to systems sciences: isomorphism, the analysis of the laws which are common to all species derived of those dimensions of space and time and those organic scales.

We thus shall deal in this section also with the same themes that the other sections, as the Universe is truly self-similar, fractal, repetitive and ultimately made of simple elements.

But here we shall stress more the philosophy and epistemology of Scalar Space-Time, which despite being a logic-mathematical formalism, describes from a philosophical perspective an organic, fractal Universe, as the cellular/atomic elements evolve socially into bigger wholes, molecules, cells, planet sand stars, galaxies.

Thus, the philosophical implications are enormous and multi-faceted so we shall consider them in this section.

General Systems: Its historic origin and predecessors

New 5th dimension

In the graph, the 3 arrows of space-time considered from the perspective of the 5th dimension, upwards in the pyramid, the ‘arrow’ of FUTURE, or wholes, as they co-exist with the smaller beings, and hence, as we increase the complexity of the 5th dimension; the arrow of entropy, with its inverse to the previous arrow, and the arrow of ‘present space-time, which is EACH OF THE PLANES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION, OR width of the pyramid.

From this simple scheme we can deduce many properties and interrelationships between the 3 arrows.

In the graph we can see from above to below, the metrics of the 5th dimension with the speed of clocks and size of 3 scales, the cosmic, galactic human, and cellular scales, and below we can see how it applies to the human being, which perceives 9 scales, has 3 topological networks symmetric to the 3 ages of life between its birth in the ∆-1 seminal scale and the i-ndividual and ∆+1 social scales.

And we could make a similar drawing for every species of the Universe. Hence the concept central to systems sciences: isomorphism, the analysis of the laws which are common to all species derived of those dimensions of space and time and those organic scales.

We thus shall deal in this section also with the same themes that the other sections, as the Universe is truly self-similar, fractal, repetitive and ultimately made of simple elements.

But here we shall stress more the philosophy and epistemology of Scalar Space-Time, which despite being a logic-mathematical formalism, describes from a philosophical perspective an organic, fractal Universe, as the cellular/atomic elements evolve socially into bigger wholes, molecules, cells, planet sand stars, galaxies.

Thus, the philosophical implications are enormous and multi-faceted so we shall consider them in this section.

Conclusion. Systematizing the fractal Universe and its laws and scales.

Thus we study everything departing from that generator its two fundamental ‘variations’ of space vs. time, its 3 varieties of spatial forms and temporal ages and its 3 planes of existence that generate all systems. In the 5th first isomorphisms in a rather qualitative manner, in the 5th second isomorphisms in more formal quantitative way by considering”

– The dualities of present-space-still-simultaneous-synchronous view vs. the temporal dynamic moving view, and the different back and forth arrows of energy-past and information-future between them, ruled by the 5 postulates of non-Euclidean geometry that define those flows in t he second postulate, its relative nature as Darwinian at or social acts in the 3rd, and so on and so on.

– And the ternary ages and ternary parts in space.

And the 10 social scales of tetraktys from soldiers to caporals to captains to generals toll the magic 1011 number that brings us a whole. So that is the number of galaxies in the Universe, of stars in a galaxy, and for each of the 10 planets of each star more or less that is the number of humans in the planet, of cells in a life being, of DNA ties in a genetic molecule… Variations of course as the game is NOT mechanical but organic, adapted to the survival in each system and whole world occur, but it is fascinating to see how much exactitude occur – the more so when we go down into perfect forms without entropy of energy or information, till arriving to the ideal 0-scale of mathematical logic albeit as Saint Augustine said of the logic of god the mind of the Universe ‘of a higher logic than the Aristotelian Euclidean man)

And so going upward or downwards we do study by breaking in 3 x 3 +0 parts each fractal part reality both ways.

For example man has its 10 physiological systems of which the 0 one that coordinates them all – the black ball in the center of the tetraktys of a billiard plane is the nervous system, and we can divide it further into ternary symmetries.

– For example the ternary symmetries of scale – as each part has 3 subparts, that became other 3 subparts, so for example the nervous system has:

Sp (lineal spinal chord) < ST (medulla) > Tƒ (brain)

And then the encephalon has 3 parts: Sp (cerebellum) < ST (white matter) > Tƒ (grey matter)

And then…

You see this is the formal way: a generator equation, subdivided in 3 x 3 x o elements and then study all its parts and subparts in time and space.

Now because the science of the age, was dominated by the Industrial R=evolution, which then was in the age of creation of hearts of metal (engines, or age of Germany), the new heroes of science were, where the oil and electric motor were discovered.

An there the ego paradox of the ‘animetal enzyman’ that catalyzed the evolution of machines and weapons, the physicist who feel superior to the mathematician and philosopher reached its paroxysm of ego-centered beliefs.

Now the sickness infected mathematics, and since non-Euclidean geometry had made clear the need for a definition in fractal terms of the ill-defined ‘elements’ of mathematics, the point with breath, the lineal wave of communication, the topological network, and the existence of betweeness or not (which implies that a line requires 3 NOT two points to be defined, origin of the ternary symmetries of the Universe, that an elliptic geometry has NOT betweeness, because it is a cycle and the cycle is finite but unbounded, etc. etc. themes those of 5D metric and ¬Æ which go beyond the scope of this post), etc. alas, instead of having a new look at the Universe of Lobachevski pangeometry and its scales discovered by telescopes and microscopes, and describe as we have done the paradoxes of the ‘real 5th dimension’, there it came to ‘imaginative’ mathematicians who decided to scrap completely reality from mathematics.

– So one of them Cantor substituted the point and the social number as units of geometry and algebra by an imagined concept the ‘set’.

– And other Hilbert, said that since he didn’t know how to define points, lines and planes, they must be ‘undefined terms’, ‘imagined’ by the mathematician. It was the birth of modern mathematics.

As usual, when such outrageous ego trips happen (as when hawking imagined his black holes as time machines) the world got first nuts, having a laugh to the big egos. But big egos work a lot, they have an intensity of actions, to impose its knot view, and non-big egos, we are lazy aware of the enormity of the whole, and tend to be Taoist wu-wei, dolce fare niente people, astonished to the intensity of the egos to establish its canonical lies and truths.

So Hilbert and Cantor put together his lunatic forces, and Hilbert said famously ‘that nobody would take us from the Paradise of Cantor sets’ and took Cantor from the mad house where he was living, justly after inventing reality. And alas, they put together all the power of the German Empire in its paroxysm of ego-centered beliefs (reached latter during Hilbert’s lifetime by the Nazi squads) and refurbished the meaning of mathematics, till this day. I recall when I was young selected for the mathematical Olympiads, with a sudden rush of enthusiasm, I sent the solution to the Fermat last theorem, with a brief note, to Nature magazine:

‘I have resolved the problem of Mr. Fermat, my fellow Basque amateur scientist, which he couldn’t scribble in the side of his book note. As you can see, I managed to write it into the margin; just 3 sentences; so if you are so kind to put it as a brief note’. It requires though to understand the bidimensionality of spatial entropy and temporal information, which put together create the holographic Universe (so you will be reading the note in a bidimensional sheet of information). So include a 30 pages addenda on the realist nature of mathematics which merely reflect the structure of the pan-geometry of the Universe.

The proof is indeed trivial. Because the Universe messes bidimensional surfaces of space-time, the superposition rule only works for bidimensional systems, hence X3+Y3 ≠ Z 3 and that fitted in the margin of my book on macro-economics along my existential poems, which I valued more.

Decades latter, with the help of computers, the true mind of the modern scientist, and hundred of pages, some Anglo enzyman found a somewhat longer proof that didn’t fit on the margin not even that of the Britannica (-;

This I said because ‘the Universe is simple but not malicious’, and finite in its sizes, for each scale whose quanta do not go beyond 1011 without moving to another scale and becoming ‘something else’.

So what Lobachevski had proved in his pangeometry, which starts defining finite lines, is that parallels are NOT infinite, and so INFINITE is an indefinable concept, which therefore CANNOT be used in mathematical proofs, and should NOT be considered an element of truth, because we shall ENTER into paradoxes of all kind, as equations BREAK beyond its finite, but unbounded, cyclical form (more properly a Mobius string, if we were to enter into a more precise define of a worldcycle).

So in Germany mathematics had its ego power, but not its reasons – that was in Russia, with Lobachevski, and his insistence that experimental evidence was needed as mathematics was a realist science, and in Austria with Gödel, which would make a fool of Hilbert, and in Britain with Russell which would make a fool of Cantor’s infinity cardinals, and in France with Mandelbrot that will discover the fractal point, so the whole cycle from Descartes to Mandelbrot will be closed – we just put the epilogue.

The paradoxes of set theory merely show Cantor’s concept of infinity is wrong. And this should be obvious to any simple not malicious minds: you cannot compare infinities because they are undefined. The only defined one in a ‘differential manner’ is 0 x ∞, the definition of a constant mind of which there are as many variations as in a differential equation.

You know NOTHING about the real mathematical world, Mr. Hilbert, Mr. Cantor. But now all mathematicians are Hilbertians and Cantorians, what I call Mathematical Hilventors, that is inventors in its ego trip of a false paradise, which does work as all worlds are possible but has little to do with reality, and makes mathematics no longer a world of mind pleasures achieved when the world within us observes as Kant put it in his epitaph, the world outsides it, and finds it to be a focused mirror with no deformation of that larger reality, instead of a twisted elliptic Klein bottle of unending self-twisted unescaping black holes.

Of course the Axiomatic method and sets do have their use specially in algebra, and for specific parts of it, but they do NOT represent the simplicity of the Universe, do NOT reflect the fundamental elements of space, the fractal point, of time, the point-cycle, of the 5th dimension, the social number, and its direct relationship with reality. And the only effect it has had is the separation between people and mathematics, as mathematics became yet another ‘expert’ field, unconnected from reality.

So they have provoked a lack of society’s interest for mathematics, precisely when mathematics through computers have become the fundamental language of power and control of society. For that reason it is imperative that people do understand mathematics and how mathematical logic creates reality.

Let us then escape the metaphoric language and clarify, in simple terms… the fractal principle of creation.

Systems are NOT only defined by its fractal equation in space and time, but ultimately each of its parts is also a super organism with 3 fractal elements in space time and the 5th dimension. And so we can study infinite detailed analysis of each system at all its scales and space-time parts that will become then again elements of a ternary system. So your arm does have a Tiƒ hand, an ST arm and a Sp-elbow. And so on.

Those rules allow the entity to play an interconnected, synchronized role as part of a bigger organism and/or ecosystem, in which it will play its dynamic, causal chains/arrows of existence and life cycles:

Max.Tƒ(seed)->Max.Sp(youth)->Max.Reproduction (Maturity)->Max.Information (3rd Age)->Death(Tƒ->Sp)

But Life cycles can be immortal, if instead of dying after its 3rd Age the entity evolves socially as cell of a higher system communicated with its informative language (Est-1). Then the species will ‘transcend’ into a complex super-organism. Some systems might even attempt a feedback cycle of immortality (Physical particles, simple biological jellyfishes:

I-> ‘—motions’ youth ->reproduction <-’—motions’ Youth…

‘—motions’ (wave) -> Information (Particle) ->‘—motions’ (wave)

And so, with those simple rules we can classify as we shall do in our studies of physical, biological and sociological species of the Universe all the entities of reality and its events.

Recap: The ternary principle explains the creation and diversification fractal super-organisms both in time ages, scalar planes and network-spaces. Space is infinite time is not, time games are less than space. Because the volume of space is bigger than the volume of time all forms have been repeated. And so all is repeated again.

® SYMBOLS

Main symbols of scalar, relational space-time, (its dualities and paradoxes; its laws and symmetries); of i-logic Geometry and existential algebra (its generator and partial equations – isomorphisms).

We include this basic table of fundamental symbols for the spatial and temporal dimensions, its symmetries and fundamental space-time åctions across the different planes of space-time of the Universe, as a reference to the meaning of its main symbols and dualities and ternary symmetries. The table can be used as a reminder of the foundations of Scalar space-time.

The main 2 paradoxes of scalar space-time are:

The Galilean paradox: ∑e=S; ∑Tƒ=I

All can be perceived either as static form or motion. So we must define both states for each being made of ‘formal motions’, either the spatial (fixed distance) motion- energy or temporal (moving cycle) form.

Symbols of space, Time.

_ S; Se : Space-Speed: Spatial, lineal, Euclidean distances, perceived either as fixed space or lineal motion.

Sensu stricto, the correct symbol is S for Space-speed (an scalar distance-motion). In reality most space do have ‘stored’ in the ‘micro-quanta’ of its ‘lower scales’ we do not see in the continuous perception, ‘cyclical points of time’, which form an ‘inertial mass-energy’, stored in the relative vacuum space. Hence Se defines also ‘space’. For example, pure vacuum does have energy because it is likely a ‘sea’ of photons, which ‘surface’ in ‘åctions’ of creation of particles (Heisenberg uncertainty principle). A water space does have molecules of water, their ‘mass’.

– O, 1/T; Tƒ, Tƒ: Temporal Form, Temporal in-form-ation, Cyclical clocks of Time, perceived either as still cyclical forms, or rotary motions.

T is duration, the 4th dimension of classic physics, or lineal time. But lineal time eliminates the fundamental property of time, to be cyclical. So we never use as in the case of S the T symbol alone, as cyclical time is measured by frequency, the inverse of lineal time, T=1/ƒ. So instead we write Tƒ, which is the inverse of T, T=1/Tƒ=1/ƒ, and its units are frequency and angular speed, w.

On the other hand Tƒ is temporal information, which as the case of Se is a combined parameter (so we prefer Tƒ), which includes information, form-in-action, motion.

Some concepts in that sense requires more detailed explanations as they are very restricted in its physical equations but far more extensive in its day to day use. This is the case of ‘energy and information’ using often as synonymous of lineal space-motions and cyclical forms (S and T). This is how most often they are used in general conversation, though we are aware that the mathematical equations are somehow more restricted. So goes with concepts such as entropy and time. So we shall go through lengths to clarify both concepts. We do however like to use energy and information as synonymous of Lineal Space and Cyclical Time, as energy is indeed used constantly to denote lineal motions and information is stored in the cyclical forms and frequency of time cycles, so it has a close relationship.

– Œ,Ø, ST, combined bidimensional space-time element. Œ will be the commonest symbol for a fractal point (spatial perception) or function of existence (temporal perception); the fundamental logic-mathematical unit of the Universe, in the lower scale of undetailed description, which combines a cyclical Tƒ particle-head and a wave-body moving thanks to the energy of motion present in a field-ecosystem.

Thus descriptions of beings can range from the simplest particle-point description of statics, through its relative motion in dynamics/mechanics, further on to its complete description in relationship to an external field. And as we diminish or grow in range other fundamental concepts appear:

-Actions: ∂æ,e,ï,œ,û: they are the external motions of the Œ in the larger space-time World, ST, with a purpose and a sequential order:

ƕ: The point first perceives, ƕ with rotary motion, o, from a point of view of an O-bserver.

∆a: Then as it perceives a motion that changes its relative ecosystem/territory/fields, it moves, accelerates or decelerates, ∆a.

∆e, ∆ï: And the motion takes it into a prey-predator exchange of energy event, or a parallel event that transfers information between two points, which in its whole expression becomes:

∆œ: an act of reproduction of an individual, iterated as an invariant form of the original being. We distinguish small ∆ï exchanges of information, from complete ∆œ reproductive åctions proper.

∆U: finally thanks to those acts of social reproduction and communication of information a whole Organism, a Universal U is created from the sum of an infinity of individuals: 1010 i=U

‰ U±1; a topological plane≈network of ∆-points and its Super-organism, which is made of 3 such networks, extended through 3 scales of space-time, the cellular/atomic, organic/thermodynamic, social/gravitational scales.

W:Worldcycle. It is the maximal description of the being, across all its planes, through all its åctions, through all its networks, along all its duration, between life and birth

Spe, energy, Tiƒ, information:

We might say that both are ‘combined parameters’ (energy includes mass or charge or any other cyclical particle so it does have a time component, and information transfers through waves, is form in motion, so it has a lineal, spatial parameter, but energy is dominant in lineal motion, so work discharges the forces that do not act on the line-motion and information is dominant in form, as a wave keeps its form as energy fades away). We cannot make concepts more simple and less ambivalent without simplifying too much the paradoxes and dualities and multiplicities of functions and combinations of space and time parameters, since those ‘combinatory operations’, is what the Universe does to create and iterate and differentiate its infinite existential beings departing only of 3 elements, space, time and its social scales and universal planes.

Partial equations: inverse properties of: Se vs. Tƒ, which merge Se≈Tƒ, to create the ∞ varieties of Space-time.

Lineal, spatial energy is the inverse of cyclical temporal information. But both together form constant dynamic systems. And so we write that duality which generates all systems of the Universe with different equations:

Œ=S/T=K; ∂s/∂t; Se< =>Tƒ; Œ=Se x Tƒ;   S≈T, Sp≈Tƒ; Sp x Tƒ = ST;   Se x Tƒ = ST ≈ ST±4 etc.

All those varieties of the Fractal Generator of Space-time play with some basic symbols that express the 2+1 ternary elements of reality (Space≈ Energy, Time≈ Information and its infinite combinations. So we shall consider the main symbols for those 2 formal motions and its ternary combinations, either described as ‘dimensions’ or ‘motions’ of space-time (Galilean Paradox).

Now the reader should understand why we use for each main formal motion and scale of reality at least a couple of ambivalent symbols. Since we want to convey the complexity, duality and ternary principles of the fractal Universe in which most systems have 2 or 3 functions and different interpretations, depending on how we see it (from an external or internal point of view, in motion or as a form, in terms of information or energy, speed or size, etc.). At the beginning it might seem paradoxical, because the Universe is paradoxical and perhaps confusing, but this confusion is needed for the reader to change its chip from a merely quantitative, limited, reductionist analysis of reality to a more complex, logic, paradoxical, biological, organic understanding, which includes as a ceteris paribus analysis (correspondence principle) the more limited but exact quantitative equations of classic science, explained in its whys thanks to the qualitative paradoxical analysis.

Symbols of the scales of the 5Dimension: ST; U±4;

ST; Bidimensional Space-Time , which combines a dimension of space and one dimension of time. The 3 main varieties are:

Sp: Past, entropic, dominant planar or toroid surface.

ST: Present, repetitive, balanced hyperbolic wave-body, and general form of the åctions, which exchange energy and information between 2 points (transversal wave) or a line and a point (conic trajectory)

: Head/particle/informative nuclei, which processes logically in a faster, smaller space the cycles of the external world mapping them into a logic knot that develop the future åctions of the system.

5D, ST, U(0-9); S ∆±4: 5th dimension; Scalar Space-Time: a series of ‘scales of space’ of increasing size and diminishing speed of information and vice versa, which structures the Universe across relative bidimensional planes of space-time, which put together create the 5th dimension.

Why we use several scales? Tƒ convey the complexity of the 3 arrow of time. Those scales depart from a regularity caused by the perfect form of a 10 number (tetraktys) which is the commonest number to emerge as a social whole, with all the full functions of a vital Space-time system. And so the social scales is a decametric scale, which after 10 scalar growths, creates a society of 1010 points, which becomes a new Plane of Existence, a whole, somewhat separated from its parts which become identical infinitesimals. Thus 1010 u= U+1

Further on, since the fundamental co-invariant law of the 5th dimension is in the inverted properties of space and time, such as the product of the spatial size and temporal cyclical frequency, remains constant: S/T= C, S x Tƒ = C, it follows that the arrows of information (Tƒ) and Size are inverted. Further on uncertainty principles make the human scale the relative ‘0’ point, of maximal perception. So we can classify according to the ternary principle scales in 3 relative time arrows.

As such 3 symbols and scales are used:

5D for the 5th dimension and its infinite scales of space and temporal information.

ST, abb. U, i: I(9-0):

Planes of scalar space-time from future to past are ordered according to its quantity of ‘information’, I, which makes paradoxically, smaller beings, with faster time clocks of information, such as the genetic scale compared to the human scale, or the quantum scale compared to the galactic one, ‘planes of space-time’ of higher information. The scale is logarithmic in base 1011, and goes from 10 (light forces that transfer information at maximal speed) to 0 (above the local Universe, which we cannot perceive hence have zero information from the human perspective).

5D fractal space-cyclical time

In the graph, we grow in information as we diminish in scale (informative arrow) and inversely we diminish in Size, S. Yet, for larger wholes to exist, smaller systems must have appeared first. So we define an arrow from past (smaller systems) into future (whole systems) and consider the U scale to move from 9 (max. information: electromagnetic space) to 0 minimal information (the entire Universe.)

U, U(0-9): Scale of size, from past to future. It is the more intuitive scale, from parts to wholes and the most used. The S-scale moves from 0-forces to 10-Total Universe inverted to the scale in information that moves from 10-forces to 0-Universe. It will be the standard scale when nothing is mentioned.

Planes of scalar space-time ordered from smaller ‘individual, informative quanta’, into bigger wholes, or ‘Universals’, the Universal scale is based in size, and so it is inverse to the ST scale, making the whole Universe, the 10th scale of maximal size and the quanta of forces (strings and h-plancks) the smaller 0-1 scale.

Thus both scales are inverted, as it always happens when we compare space vs. time, entropy vs. information; since the fundamental law of the Universe is the inverse properties of lineal-spatial motions vs. cyclical, temporal ones.

We do use as standard scale the Stu of size, so unless we write ST=x, it is understood that the ST5 numerical symbol defines a logarithmic 10 up to 11 scale of increasing size; whereas only ‘5’ the human scale is the same going upwards in size or downwards in information.

So ST10 means the Universal Scale; ST9: The local, perceived cosmos, ST8, the galaxy, ST7, the stars and cosmic bodies, ST6, the planet and global societies, ST5, the human being and geological formations, ST4, the cell and the states of matter, ST3 the molecules, ST2, the atom, ST1 the light forces, and Tƒ, the string/gravitational invisible scale.

The reader should notice that ST10 and ST0 are both beyond our range of perception and perhaps units of a smaller and larger new Universal scales.

If we use the informative scale the numbers will be inverse. So ST=10 is the force scale, and ST=5 the human scale both in the U∆ and ST 5D frames of reference.

In reality ‘systems’ are made as Russian Dolls, by the coming together of a lower plane of energy-information minimal quanta, which sustains a larger plane of ‘whole’ networks.

So the Universe is in fact a nested system, such as the smallish quanta and bits of energy and information are the components of the larger Planes of space-time. Thus we write the main systems also in reference to the human scale, which is considered the ST=5 scale. So we write:

ST±4, ∆±4; U±4. On the other hand, if we consider the human organic plane of existence (which in matter is equivalent to the thermodynamic plane of states of matter), we can create a scale of relative upper and lower scales, which not being commutative (the perception of the Individual is different according to

In the graph, ST±4 ,or ∆±4, or u±4, which is the scale removed 4 planes of size above and below humans, which is the scale of the Universe and its gravitational ‘string quanta’. To notice that in this manner both scales, the logarithmic informative and size scales are equal, only that in ∆±4, ∆+4 is the string quanta and in u±4, u+4 is the Universal quanta.

The difference of scale is obvious. We introduce in those analysis the ‘human Observer’. Since the pretentious sense of absolute truth of the humans’ simplified continuous single space-time plane vanishes when we have to perceive Universal Planes above and below us which do not transfer all the energy and information, as events of space-time in the same Universe do.

This causes a difference of perception, elliptic above, toroid below.

We normally use all other terms followed by the ± element to signify we are biased by our human center of view, which becomes the O-bserver of science, whose mind therefore ‘changes’ the observable (or vice versa, in the anti-quantum paradox of social sciences).

All this leads to the understanding of systems in mere geometrical forms, as the 3 parts of a system become frames of inertial reference of spherical, hyperbolic and toroid form:

Ox– = Ø:    O (spherical coordinates, head-particles)x – (lineal, planar, coordinates, limbs-fields) = Ø-hyperbolic coordinates/body-wave

Dimensions and symmetries of ‘holographic’ space-time.

Sl, Sw, St: The 3 dimensions of space, Long, lineal motions; wide-wave dimensions/motions; tall-high/dimensions-motions.

They are symmetric to the 3 ages/dimensions of Time:

Sl->Te; <: Entropic, energetic, expansive, past motions. Te is the organic, present spatial symbol, < the dynamic symbol.

Sw-> ST: present, repetitive, wave-like åctions. ST is the organic, present spatial symbol, = the dynamic symbol.

U->Tƒ, >, Tƒ: Informative, old, future motions. is the organic, present spatial symbol, > the dynamic symbol.

Both symmetric dimensions create bidimensional Space-time membranes, which are the organic components of all systems. Since Time dominates space, we use the temporal dimension to define them:

Se: Energetic motions or the Limbs/fields that perform them; Spe elements can be attached to the system (limbs) or external to it (fields), often both interacting together. We capitalize S the dominant element.

ST: Reprod-active motions or the wave/bodies that perform them. We capitalize both and offer two options. Short derived åctions, ST, and long complex reproductive åctions, ST.

Tƒ:: informative motions or the head/particles that perform them. We capitalize T, the dominant element of the plane. This is the future, commanding element of the system.

Non-Euclidean definitions.

When we build the Universe strictly in mathematical terms, we use Non-Euclidean ‘i-logic’ geometry. As this geometry is defined by fractal points with parts, as opposed to Euclidean points with no breath, and its causal relationships respond to non-Aristotelian ‘multiple’ ternary past-present-future time arrows, we give it the next A->e->i name.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = Spacetime mapping.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

As 2 of its ‘difficult’ postulates, the 3rd of similarity and the 5th of flows of motion and form entering the point are not really geometric but causal, logic, we call the mathematical upgrading of the human mind i-logic geometry (as we call its symbolic representation ‘existential algebra’). The 5 postulates of i-logic geometry are expressed with 5 specific symbols, which represent iconically its meaning:

1st Postulate Fractal point in space and function of existence in time: Œ.

Definition of points with informative and energetic, formal and motion, head and limb, particle and field/wave parts, the symbol referring to the cyclical time-closed part, O and the lineal spatial, motion limbs, º, to form together a Œ fractal point.

2nd Postulate: ≈: Definition of lines of points with parts as waves:

3rd Postulate: ‡. Definition of similarity. As we cannot assess absolute identity, since we do not perceive all the inner parts of the point, we must judge similarity in terms of similarity on the perceived equality, which brings social, parallel behavior between individuals or perceived dissimilarity which brings perpendicular, Darwinian behavior (which in case of predator events means indeed perpendicular contact and penetration and destruction of one point by other. So we use a symbol which shows both, parallel and perpendicular behavior: ‡

4th Postulate: ‰ Planes are now networks of points, connected by lines of energy and information. In its most complex form they mess 3 energetic, informative and reproductive ‘networks’ that give birth to an organic ‘topology’, a world, a relative Universe. So of the available qwert symbols, we use a symbol that has 3 type of points and a line, ‰ .

5th Postulate: ¢, we use for the 5th Postulate, similar to the 1st – definition of a fractal point – but perceived from the inner perspective of the flows of energy and information perceived by a point, a circular symbol which offers an aperture on the equator – the commonest region to absorb energy in any point of the Universe, and a polar axis, the commonest region to absorb and emit information.

The 3 functions of Non-Euclidean Points: Worldcycles: W= ∫ Œ dt= ∫ A dt

Actions of scalar space-time.

∑ ST ≈ ST: repetitive, cyclical åctions of space-time, which combine energy and information, Lineal and Cyclical motions. Space-Time åctions exchange energy and information between the being and the different ST, Stu, scales of the Universe. Because we act with micro and macrocosms, we relate to those other scales of space-time, reason why we consider ‘5’ vowels, to express each of those 5 åctions:

Aa, Ae, Ai, Ao, Au, or ∆a, ∆e, ∆œ, ∆o, ∆u or ∂a, ∂e, ∂I, ∂o, ∂u. As we use A for action, or ∆, ∂ for the mathematical definition of those åctions which are for each being:

– The increase of its ∆a: accelerated motions or ‘external energy increase’; which happens by interaction with the furthest ‘Universal plane’: ∆a: U±>∆

– ∆e: energy, absorption, feeding, or internal energy increase

Рƕ: information, or internal form perception

– ∆œ: reproductive offspring, or internal information reproduction and…

– ∆u: social evolution into Universals or growth from scale.

Those are the 5 fundamental åctions all Œ-systems of the Universe perform in order to survive by replenishing its inner and outer energy and information, reproduce and become a stronger social whole.

Social Scales vs. Universal Planes.

In strict sense, we should always talk of Universal Planes, for the Stu (or even ST) scales. We use though often the term scale and scalar space-time. But sensu stricto, the concept of social scales MUST be used for the different U= 10 U-1 social scales of growth between to Universal planes, U=1011 Stu-1

That is, systems evolve in decametric scales to reach an organic new social plane or ‘Universal’. So for example, humans evolved from So=1 individuals into S1=10 families, into S2=100 clans, into S3=1000 tribes and so on till reaching S10=10 billion global society, the one we are reaching now. So happens for DNA molecular ties, Stars in galaxies and cells in organisms. Since roughly speaking (though there are many varieties explained in detail in the texts), systems do evolve through 3 x 3 +1 ages and population scales in time and space. And a great deal of knowledge is achieved in the study of those scales for each system and the languages of information used to put together parts into wholes.

Here again we find the duality of space and time, energy and information. So we can consider two ‘social scales’, the spatial, population, social scale, S(1-10) which focuses in the number of individuals a society has, its population in space. And we can consider also the L, or I, linguistic, informative order, which shows the evolution of social groups according to the 3 ‘linguistic ages of information’, the genetic, geographic and organic ages which use languages of increasing complexity. So we talk of:

S10 ≈ L3 (10 scales of population, 3 linguistic ages) -> Stu1, create a new Universal Plane.

Œ: Functions of Existence, Organisms and Worldcycles.

Because those spacetime cyclical åctions are the natural unit of the Universe, which we perceive in whole, they are the fundamental analyzed element of reality. For example physics makes an exhaustive analysis of Aa, åctions of motion, which are the simplest of them. Optics studies åctions of information that collapse and integrate ¥-rays into focused mappings, images of reality in a zero point, crystal or mind. Sociology studies in depth the ∆u åctions of social evolution of humans from So, the individual through S1, the family, S2, the clan, S3, the tribe, upwards till the present human global society of around 0.7 x 1010 elements, which foresees the creation of a whole new Social global plane.

Actions thus are the main unit of study, both externally, considering the motion of a point in a cyclical trajectory and internally, considering the purpose of that motion. Absolute Space-time sciences care little about the inner reasons given by the evolutionary program of existence, sum of all those åctions. We do, as the program reveals the structure through time of a function of existence, its purpose and sequential causal order. Thus we define the integral of all the åctions in sequential time of a being as its worldcycle, sum of all those cyclical åctions, performed one after the other:

Worldcycle: W: Πintegrated in time.

W= ∫æ,e,ï,œ,û dt

This being one of the most practical expressions of the Existential function in time.

The ‘worldcycle’ of life and death that expresses the existence on time and space of any entity of the Universe. And it is better expressed, when we consider that the sequential order of those åctions, is clearly organized as a series in which each type of action dominates a certain age. Thus the conception age is ∆œ, the creation of a seminal point of pure information, which will reproduce and emerge in the life system, by reproducing those cells with free energy, living then a young age of pure motion. So we move from: ∆œ->∆e,∆a (fetus and youth) ->∆œ, till the being enters adulthood and reproduces, in the mature age where e and I balance each other e=I, maximizing the production, perhaps the most clear expression of the function of existence, exi. And so finally the being in its adulthood, with a family and an extended network of connections with the world, enters the old age of maximal social evolution and information, ∆u

Thus, the sequential combination of those action ages, gives us an equation that develops the World cycle in terms of the use of its ‘vital space’ to perform those sequential åctions.

If we call the total vital space of a being, its ‘Total Energy+Information’ (which in physical systems is equivalent to the Kinetic energy (Se) and its internal and potential energy (Tƒ)), then we can establish an equation that vibrates between both poles Se <= >Tƒ, from Max. Tƒ (conception), to max. Se (youth) to balanced Se=Tƒ (adult) to max Tƒ (old age of information) to death (Max. Se: erasing of information back to energy in death).

Thus the worldcycle the fundamental event of all systems of the Universe, writes in a more complex detailed form the dynamic 3±∆ ages of any space-time cycle:

∆-1 (Conception) ∑ Sp x Ft (fetus) = Speu (youth) < STu (maturity) > Tƒu (3rd age) <<∑ST-2 (Death)

Superorganism: U±1: Œ integrated in space.

But the existential function can also be expressed in space, and then we use the organic ternary expression as each Œ, is a 0-point, composed of 3 ∑networks, one that provides energy-motion, either limbs or fields, one that provides sensorial information and one reproductive body-wave network. So we write:

Œ =Tƒ < ST> Se, or Se<=> Tƒ, or Se x Tƒ = ST±4, and many of the spatial varieties.

Which is the definition of a superorganism, the integration of multiple space-time cycles across 3 scales, U±1.

Spe< ST>Tƒ is a more dynamical temporal expression, which also represents the ‘3 ages’ of a worldcycle of existence, the energetic, entropic young age dominated by the Spe (field/limb) systems, the ST Reproductive, or rather reprod-active system, of cyclical åctions which represent the dynamic present life of the system, and the Tƒ informative membrane-head dominant in the 3rd age of the system.

The function of existence is therefore an spatial, organic, visual description of the 3 parts of any system.

Other Varieties of the Generator Equation

The main symbols of fractal, relational scalar space-time are then combined in equations of existential algebra, to express the laws represented by those isomorphisms, which are ‘partial’ equations of the Generator Equation of the Universe, and any possible event. We use then the symbols > for expansive motion that becomes informative form (future arrow), < for informative point that becomes expansive motion (Past arrow), and = for repetitive, present motions.

We consider here the main expressions of the Generator equation that represents all ternary events and ternary organs of all systems in time and space, across the ±4 relative planes of existence of the being.

We use mainly 2 simplified expression, for philosophical, qualitative analysis and quantitative, geometrical one:

Tƒ ExI=ST, which is the ‘function of existence’ of all systems, written also in a more complete form as Tƒ<∑ Sp x Tƒ = ST±4 Needless to say it has been chosen by its acronym name, but it does represent the fundamental elements of any system, its relative energy and information, which form together a ‘stable’ Space-Time being across ±4 relative planes in which the system will enact its åctions of motion, perception, feeding, reproduction and social evolution. In essence the 3 elements of all systems are represented in that simple acronym:

Tƒ: the Informative head; ExI, the body that exchanges and combines energy and information as it reproduces the system, and ST±4, the external field from where it extracts its bits and quanta of information and energy to perform its åctions. Thus Tƒ Exist is indeed to be made of 3 ‘organic’ varieties of bidimensional space-time, the Tƒ zero-point (head/particle), the body-wave of energy and information (ExI) and the larger limbs/fields of space-time from where the system extracts its existential åctions, bits and quanta.

This expression of the Function of Existence is also used whenever we discuss in philosophical, qualitative terms the different events, forms and elements of the 5th dimension.

Existential Algebra

It follows then that what we call existence all its events and forms can be deduced from different partial equations, developments in time and space and combined operations obtained manipulating the two previous equations of existential algebra.

The set of equations derived from that existential algebra, which every system in the Universe follows are the isomorphisms of reality. And we can group them in 10 isomorphic sets of laws.

Let us then consider the 10 main partial equations derived from the Generator equation of the Universe, or ‘isomorphisms of nature’:

Isomorphisms, Invariant Laws, informative similarities.

Finally the common sets of isomorphic, invariant laws of scalar space-time that all systems of the Universe followed are numbered and grouped with 10 numerals, which are related to its ‘varieties’.

The main of those isomorphisms are in bold, and correspond to the ‘common’ properties/dimensions of space, time and the scalar space-time åctions all systems perform:

1st. ExI≈st

The isomorphism that defines the duality of motion and form of all systems (Galilean paradox), represented with the equation of existence: Ex I = ST, which considers the 4 fundamental parameters we use to explain the Universe, energy (space in motion), information (time cycles seen in stillness), Space (lineal energy seen as distance) and time clocks (form in cyclical motion).

  1. Spe< ST>Tƒ

The 2nd, or spatial isomorphism that defines the bidimensional varieties of space-time that structure all organs, and it is the 2nd isomorphism since they are 2-manifold varieties. And since there are only 3 bidimensional topologies, there are only 3 type of organs: toroid, entropic, moving systems; hyperbolic, wave-like reproductive bodies and informative closed spheres and central zero points.

  1. The worldcycle isomorphisms: Speu (youth) < STu (maturity) > Tfu (3rd age)

The 3 ages/dimensions/horizons of time are the 3rd isomorphism of the Universe, with its past-entropic, future-informative and present, repetitive time phases of any time cycle:

  1. ST±4: Planes of Existence.

The 4 isomorphism is the isomorphism of the ∆±4= 9 Universal planes in reference to man’s perception between the invisible, 0-10 strings and non-local Universe.

  1. ∂(æ,e,ï,œ,û)

The 5th isomorphism is the isomorphism of the 5 åctions any system performs through its relative, ∆±4 relative planes, interacting with them to extract energy and information:

Aa: ∆±4 (changes in accelerations, decelerations and speeds, due to the interaction of the system with the gravitational forces of the U±4 nested scale (cosmos and gravitational forces).

Ai:∆±3 (changes in perception by interaction with the U±3 plane of galaxies and electromagnetic light.

Ae: ∆±2: absorption of inner cellular quanta, as energy from the relative world, in the human case amino acids obtained by hunting in the external world.

Ao: ∆+1->i: reproduction of a seminal offspring on the lower cellular/atomic plane of higher information to give birth to a new individual…

Au: ∆u+1: social evolution into a higher Universal plane with similar individuals.

  1. The 6th isomorphism, perhaps the less important describes the ‘relative value’ which for the individual has the fractal points of those scales, which are the relative social parts of its system, from the dominant ∆+1 social scale to the lower, ∆-4 invisible force quanta.

In that regard there should be 6 relative ‘classes’, 3 internal and 3 external to the being:

The Max.Tƒ head, which controls as the point of future the ExI, ST active body or present system, which together control and ab=use the limbs/fields that move the system. Those are the 3 physiological networks/systems that create any organism, and are internal to the being.

In terms of ‘planes of existence’, they are determined by their cohesion or degree of connectedness as wholes. The Tƒ is a network system, so we often write it as ∏Tƒ (as all neurons are connected creating a whole): U+1. The body is a herd system, with loose connections between cells, or ∆≈U, and the limbs/fields are herds of unconnected ∑ u-1, expendable parts (so even in the most organized living systems, simple animals can loose and regenerate a tail or teeth).

Then we have the 3 smaller, external classes, the invisible U±4 forces, the perceivable, U±3 informative bits and the U±2 energy quanta absorbed as bricks of internal construction of the being. Those 3 ‘social classes’ are entities in themselves but the individual has zero care for them, destroying the U±2 organism to obtain its quanta (Darwinian, perpendicular prey: ‡), collapsing the U±2 bits of information to create mental mappings (so we collapse light into electrons to perceive) and drifting on the invisible sea of forces along a gradient in steady, parallel orbits and perpendicular, accelerating and decelerating trajectories to displace on the Cosmic U±4 highest/lowest plane of existence).

  1. The 7th isomorphism studies the quantitative main vital, or universal constants that define in any system the relationship between its different parts (ratios of exchange of energy and information, social number of universal evolution, etc.)

Along with the isomorphisms of spatial dimensions, temporal ages, åctions through planes of existence, and the O-point or mind isomorphism, it is one of the 5 key isomorphisms of systems, as it defines each ‘variety’ of existence and so adapts the Generator Equation to each specific science, its jargon and quantitative analysis.

It does connects Scalar Space-Time with classic sciences. For example, in a biological organism, the dynamic/structural generator equation and its 3 organic varieties, Spe<ST>Tƒ : Spe x Tƒ = ST, represents Limbs < (Body) > Head; and there exists for each variety a certain proportionality between them, which differentiates different species, such as for example, the human being, which has the highest ratio of head to body-limbs in weight and a 1-9 ratio in size (as Leonardo shows in its Vitruvian man).

8: 23=4×2… We consider the laws of creation of all systems which happen according to the ‘dualities’, ternary symmetries between space and time dimensions, its combinations and the 4 ‘numbers/letters/laws, etc.’ which code the action of systems, from quantum numbers to genetic letters.

  1. The isomorphism of the social scales in a Universe of decametric social groups in which the ‘10’ as in a tetraktys is the social center that ‘emerges’ as unit of a lower scale. So 10 soldiers have a caporal, which is the unit of 10 units that form a century, and so on. So we write   10 U ≈U+1
  2. are therefore the 10 planes of reality in which all its species follow the previous isomorphisms. So we write Ux1010 ≈U+1

0 is the zero point, or center of any system in which the will of its åctions and consciousness of the whole exist.

This is the other fundamental isomorphism, as any system, which creates a zero point, survives better. Its equation is O (infinitesimal mapping) x ∞ (external world) = Ci (Constant informative mind) and it is derived mathematically from the Poincare conjecture, that is, a spherical Tƒ bidimensional variety of topology can shrink without deformation creating a mapping of the Universe.

Again zero points might not exist or be unfocused but then the system survives worst. So Crystals in which the zero point image does exist dominate all solid, physical systems, from planets to rocks, while amorphous rocks last less in time. And this proves again the unity of nature and all its systems, regardless of its varieties.

But zero points also diminish the survival chances of any species, by creating a subjective mapping which undervalues the power of other living systems, as the projective geometry of mind mappings (Desarguian mathematics), makes the closest nose bigger than the entire Andromeda galaxy. Thus the ego paradox limits the survival of beings which do not assess objectively the world dangers in which it lives. This of course is happening also to mankind which evolves metal-minds (robots, computers, internets), of higher existential momentum/force and even tries to make black holes on Nuclear devices (the top predator momentum of the Universe).

All systems of the Universe thus can be fully generated and described in time space, åctions and scales by the study on how those 10 isomorphic sets of laws derived of its scalar space-time nature apply to each variety of existence, which ultimately represent a program of existence of 5 åctions, ∂æ,e,ï,œ,û represented in the different perceptions of the Existential function, ∑ Sp x Tƒ = ST±4

The enormous task of doing so will improve accordingly the chances of survival of any species, which understands in this manner the Universe. Man has not and this writer now in his Tƒ 3rd age close to its Stu-2 demise had tried his best to communicate those laws but it has failed. This web is meant to be his legacy for humans or computers, which might or might not inherit the Earth (if top predator black holes do not). There is thus little pride on my ‘existence’ which failed in its highest action (∂u: social interaction with mankind), but on my view the blame is partial, as the ego paradox might be perhaps the fundamental character of humans, which I have never been able to crack.

This is what we study in this web, the first line, a general introduction to scalar space-time, the program of existential åctions and the superorganisms, created with them.

The 2Nd line, a more advanced course on scalar space-time through the detailed analysis of all its 10+0 isomorphisms.

And the 3th line, a rewriting of the main disciplines of sciences, with those laws, astrophysical worlds (physical sciences), Biological systems and human sciences (human systems and mechanical systems, the economic world of machines).which will always be a work in progress, the pouring of the Britannica encyclopedia DVD version (-; into the scaffolding of cyclical space-time, that is, the study of the 10 U, U-niversal planes from forces to cosmos, through the 10 sets of isomorphic laws, all of them obey.

T.Œ: Vital, social nature of time and space and its ¬Æ-formalism.

Screen Shot 2016-04-08 at 19.47.20TŒ is based on the cyclical nature of Time and fractal structure of space evident to all systems. This Organic Structure is both Simplex but also Ternary Complex due to the 3 arrows-dimensions of time, it symmetry with the 3 organic parts of all systems, and the ternary structure of the scales of the 5th dimension that co-exist together in organic systems.

Thus the ternary Cyclical=repetitive nature of fractal space-time systems and events becomes the constrain and cause of all the laws of Science and T.Œ merely systematizes those laws by extracting them from the fundamental space, time elements of reality.

Then in each of those scales of space-time, we find that the common laws of 5D space-time Correspond with the laws of the species of each scale and its previous theories.

So all this, we resume in a formula, T.Œ=SC3 that embeds those Principles of Philosophy of Science that all Organic Time-space Systems Follow, born of the duality between the Simplex, S, principles and the ‘ternary Complexity’, C3 by repetition of those events.

We resume the postulates of the scientific method in a simple formula:

Œ=Sc3: Objectivity, Linguistic, Isomorphic Perspectives, Experimental evidence = Simple, Minimalist, truths – Ockham’s razor, Correspondence Principle, Cyclical repetition – Predictability and Complexity born of the ternary, fractal constant subdivision of reality into parts).

Now of those ‘elements’ 2 are brought about by T.Œ to the classic elements of the scientific method, ‘Linguistic Isomorphisms’, that hidden dual I and L between the O and the E of Œ (-:

That is, we can to verify further a truth consider different linguistic perspectives (mathematical, logical, mental and Organic, according to the 4 fundamental elements of all systems: its spatial symmetry, its temporal ages, its organic co-existence in 3 scales of the 5th dimension and the existence of a central point of view or 0-point that orders and focuses the program of 5 space-time survival actions that all systems perform to continue into existence).

All those point of views harmonize each other and reinforce the existence of a being. And they are the origin of the 5+5 qualitative and quantitative isomorphisms we use to describe all systems of reality). So we shall apply that methodology as we have done with other systems to astrophysics to describe the Universe and prove that is all what we need to describe reality.

So we have to adapt present theories of the Universe to the 5Dimensional, fractal, cyclical nature of space-time.

How the present Cosmic theory of reality, the big-bang Paradigm fits within that scheme?

Surprisingly enough it rather fits easily, but at present, it shows also some contradictions and limits which might be considered faults of ‘Objectivity’ mainly due to the anthropomorphic desire to explain it all from the human limited perspective.

So while we will introduce the translation of the Big-bang to 5D astrophysics, which would be a bone to get 5D accepted by mainstream science, we will be ‘objective’ to the extreme and conclude that while the big bang is a possible theory of the Universe, in the cyclical, commonly accepted version (with inflation and a final big crunch end, so it becomes a constant cyclical Universe) there is a more objective vision of the Universe, ‘absolutely relative’, and enlarged with infinite scales of space-time, in which the big-bang or an alternative cosmic Universe of trillions of galaxies, in which the cosmic explosion should be just a local phenomena of a local Universe, represent merely another scale of physical systems, as those of quantum particles, molecular atoms, states of matter and cosmic bodies.

Again, this concept is also handled profusely by astrophysicists, albeit by the obvious problem of lack of evidence, at the theoretical level, with the concept of a lower scale – the Planck scale of strings belong the particle scale of the 5th dimension and a larger scale above the galactic scale – of cosmological strings, in correspondence with the world of micro-strings.

We won’t analyze that level beyond considering some necessary corrections in a Universe of ‘background independent space-times’, as it is purely theoretical, and so this post will be dedicated to the analysis of the big-bang from the cyclical, fractal nature of space-time and the highlighting of its ‘scientific problems’, from the perspective of philosophy of science and the rules of epistemological truth we have summarized in the 6 rules of the mnemonic formula, Œ=mc2 (objectivity, Evidence, etc.)

Along the way of course we shall introduce key findings of T.Œ: the unification equation of charges and masses, the nature of particles and anti-particles, the role of background neutrinos in the Universe, the reason of the 3 families of masses and its symmetry with the 3 families of cosmic bodies, the likely nature of dark energy and dark matter, within the parameters of 5D astrophysics, etc.

Aristotelian minds. 

“In these introductory remarks, I am going to tell about some of the successes and I shall also detail what the principal critics said about The World of Null-A. Let me hasten to say that what you shall read is no acrimonious defense. In fact, I have decided to take the criticisms seriously”   The World of Null-A.  Van Vogt

The mind is aristotelian self-centred in its point of view, with a single arrow of time, its internal vital desire to exist as long as possible, maximise its function, Max. E xI body and mind, grow and multiply. The universe is a game of infinite monads, and so it is NON-æ, varying in perspective with minds of different non-Ae constructs. Of the tension between the individual selfish particle and the whole, social herd, the 2 restricted and wider subjective and objective few of reality arises:

112In the graph, when it comes to the difference between a linguistic o-mind and the ∞ Universe, that is between a linguistic world and the whole energy nd information cycles of reality, the relationship can be described in terms o logic, considering that minds, are Æ, aristotelian, with a single causality centred in the self, and Euclidean or rather Cartesian, with a single space-time frame of reference, centred in that self; while the Universe is Non-Æ, with infinite fractal points of view, space-time planes, co-existing organically, flows of energy and information, all of them diffeomorphic and local, yet obeying a global ‘logos’, the game of Non-Æ vital topologies described in this blog.

The Universe is logic in time, mathematical in space. Logic mathematics thus becomes the fundamental language of ‘STience’, the study of space-time beings, which become in itself a tautology.

But what kind of logic mathematics? obviously one that upgrades present euclidean mathematics of a single space sheet, and Aristotelian logic of a single causal arrow of space-time to the more complex fractal space, cyclical time and ternary space-time symmetries which make up the existence of all of us, finite space-time beings.

Since the ‘dimension’ of future is created first by 0-Minds who project their ‘imagination’ in the external world, re-ordering each scale. Thus minds are both the alpha and omega, described accordingly by the 1st and last postulates of the i-logic Universe:

‘The i-logic Universe is a Fractal, scalar super-organism, infinite in time duration, in time cycles, in spatial extension and spatial scales, in which all parts are self-similar to the whole, made of an infinite number of complementary systems of lineal energy and cyclical information, structured into social super-organisms, through 3∑±∆ scales, which constantly create 5 Dimensional, functional åctions, lineal energy feeding, high, informative gauging, wide, reproduction, social evolution and travel through 3 of such scales in the life-death cycles of existence; all of which is expressed in a feed-back equation, from which all laws and equations of science can be deduced:

∑Sp∆-1<=>∏Tƒ.

 Which is the Fractal Generator=Creator of all existences.
TŒ is based on the cyclical nature of Time and fractal structure of space evident to all systems. This Organic Structure is both Simplex but also Ternary Complex due to the 3 arrows-dimensions of time, it symmetry with the 3 organic parts of all systems, and the ternary structure of the scales of the 5th dimension that co-exist together in organic systems.

Thus the ternary Cyclical=repetitive nature of fractal space-time systems and events becomes the constrain and cause of all the laws of Science and T.Œ merely systematizes those laws by extracting them from the fundamental space, time elements of reality.

Then in each of those scales of space-time, we find that the common laws of 5D space-time Correspond with the laws of the species of each scale and its previous theories.

So all this, we resume in a formula, T.Œ=SC3 that embeds those Principles of Philosophy of Science that all Organic Time-space Systems Follow, born of the duality between the Simplex, S, principles and the ‘ternary Complexity’, C3 by repetition of those events.

The 3 pillars: 5th Dimension and its Scientific Scales; Cyclic Times and Fractal Spaces

The 3 empirical elements of all Universal systems: ∆ST

QLL

The metric of the 5th dimension, the field of research pioneered by this writer defines a Universe made of isomorphic scales of space-time where smaller beings in any scale of reality (from chips to black holes, quarks or rats) process information, stored in the cycles and form of its clocks of time, faster than larger beings (vacuum tubes, stars, electrons or elephants), but the product of both, S xT=K(∆±1) remains invariant.

Such invariance creates a stable ‘metric geometry’ that defines a new dimension of space-time, which solves all kind of fundamental questions about reality, from the unification of charges and masses (2 vortices of space-time of two different membranes, the quantum nanoscopic and galactic macroscopic ones, in which paradoxically the faster clocks of charges make its electromagnetic force more attractive), studied in this post, to the explanation of the life-death world cycle (no longer a world line as in 4D physics, since the new dimension of depth, ‘curves’ existence into a cycle, which happens as we travel through 3 ∆±1 planes of space-time, from the seminal ∆-1 faster plane of existence, to the human individual plane, as members of the slower ∆+1 rhythms of nations and civilizations our super organisms, to the conundrum of genetics.

Since smaller ‘systems’ paradoxically as fractals do hold more information in its faster cycles of time. So they code the larger plane of human existence. In the graph we illustrate those 3 cases showing its co-invariant Sxt parameters.

The  ‘fractal, scalar’ structure of space-time of which we are all parts that occupy a vital space and last a finite time, means also that all systems are ‘equal in value’, in a Universe of absolute relativity.

Indeed, if we call the product of the Spatial energy and temporal information of a system, its existential function, EXI=ST, which determines its survival force, all systems exist a similar amount of subjective time, because smaller beings think faster. So an ant-queen – an insect that lives 7 years but process information 10 times faster (reason why you don’t catch a fly) – lives actually 70 years.

Further on Absolute relativity allows species of different sizes to interact without extinguishing each other. And the result is that all ‘vital space-time beings’  are organized in ∆±1 planes of existence.

So humans are made of cells and form part of a global society, matter is made of atoms, and forms part of planets and stars that form part of galaxies and so on. How to order all those scales in a meaningful way?

We can do so by precisely by putting them together into the  ‘fifth dimension’ of space-time: the dimension of relative size in Space, Se, and relative speed of time clocks, Tƒ, which evolve in opposite directions, when we become ‘bigger’ or ‘smaller’.

And this unity of all beings, made of scalar space-time and related by the metric of the 5th dimension i what makes us all absolute relative because we all display the same ∆=SxT existential force, we live the same subjective time, as smaller faster beings think much more: the 7 years of an ant are in a mind that has 10 times faster thoughts, 70 years of experienced life.

We must thus study the ‘isomorphisms’ of all beings across scales as the essence of reality and only once this higher collective knowledge is realized, study the individual isomorphisms of beings.

So the 2 pillars of ∆ST (‘General Systems of isomorphic, scalar space time planes) are:

-The existence of a fractal, scalar structure in the Universe, where species of different sizes and speed of information co-exist together. And where each science studies species within a certain range of spatial size and temporal information.

-The formal metric that relates all those scales according to their different speed in its clocks of time that process information in its frequency and form, and its different size. Since both parameters together, are co-invariant, as smaller things (quarks and black holes in physical space; insects and rats in biology, chips in mechanisms) turn faster and process information faster than larger species, but the product of both is a constant that allows the interaction of several of such scales, making the complex universe possible: SP x Tƒ = ∆±4.

The Œ=Sc³ method of reasoned truths. 

T.Œ, a ‘Theory Of Everything organic’,  based in the rediscovery of cyclical time clocks, a concept, so obvious in Nature and the systems of time measure, which in the Eastern world was the basis of its religious philosophies of the Universe (Taoism and Hinduism) and in the West was natural to the Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek tradition, followed by Leibniz and his concept of relational space-time, of a Universe made of ‘fractal, vital spaces’ (the entities we see all around us), which lasted a finite time cycle (its cycle of creation, evolution and extinction).

Indeed, a historic analysis shows that ALL civilizations always thought time to be cyclical except the one who developed the western global military empire, by using first lineal iron swords and then lineal gunpowder weapons. And we shall see immediately how linearity became a necessary tool to develop ‘Germanic iron swords and gunpowder weapons’, and the close connection between lineal physics and people who culturally belong to the culture of weapons.

We are going to explain the whole world here with only those 3 time motions, its spatial symmetries and ternary co-existent planes of the 5th dimension that creates an Œ-rganism  a point-particle, a knot of cycles of timespace, of which we are all made, which lives a world cycle, made of stop and go beats of information and motion, actions of perceiving and feeding, either perceived as a ‘dynamic flows of time cycles’ , or as  a series of ‘still photographs of static space’, (as the duality of a movie, made of stills. We exist as a series of small derivatives, that measure and put together all those time cycles into simultaneous ‘slices’ of space’:

  • ∂t=S; which added together, K(v) x ∂t=S  creates the steady speed of time motions we see around us, v=S/∂t.

This is what we are, a sum of multiple time cycles, knotted into simultaneous synchronous flows of time, seen by the static mind that perceives them, as a series of still pictures of space that put together the fractal puzzle of the world.

And so with this duality of 3 time motions and its corresponding 3 spatial forms, we shall resolve, logically and mathematically, all the questions unresolved in science due to this huge simplification of cyclical times, the ultimate ‘formal motion’ of the Universe.

Since as it happened when Copernicus put the sun in the center (the conceptual advance) and Kepler and then Newton realized this simplified enormously the equations of the Universe according to the Principle of Truth called Ockham’s razor (which we shall call here ‘Simplicity’, S), the ‘Universe is simple and not malicious’ (Einstein). So once we understand time cycles, the 5 main parameters of truth of science will work to explain it all ‘simple’ and not ‘malicious’.

We put them in a formula that paraphrase Einstein’s: Œ=Sc³; which of course ads the so often forgotten O-bjectivity, which is at the heart of most of the errors, disguised as science today. So we shall talk of Logic Objectivity and Experimental evidence as the two fundamental parameters of any theory of truth; which implies Minimalism (simplicity), Correspondence with previous theories and cyclical predictability:

-Logic Objectivity is essential to science, and it is today lost to absurd theories like the big-bang, the creationist, militaristic theory of cosmology, capitalism, the subjective dictatorship of bankers, mostly of biblical cultures, who think to be chosen of go(l)d and monopolize the right to print the language of social power, money in private hands and of course creationist theories of biology, nationalist theories of history that deny the unity of all human species, which should help each other to survive as a singe species, and mechanism, which requires a God to create the machine of the Universe, unlike the organic theories of this blog.

Logic Objectivity is thus the right objective information that the Πas observer point must fight to avoid the natural subjectivity of all points of view Рbecause that is the true fight of science; and such objectivity requires rational evaluation of:

– Experimental Evidence will show ALL to be a part or a whole cycle of time motion, including a lot of phenomena observed but not explained.

– Simplicity, , will show that Time cycles explain many more things than the previous Time paradigm (Lineal Time, either in the Galilean or Einsteinian formalism). It does in fact explain it ALL, as Experimental Evidence will show all to be a time cycle.

– Correspondence will show that it also explains the previous paradigm, including Galilean and Einsteinian formalism as a ‘limiting’ case of a time cycle (that is a small part of it).

-And, yes, Complexity born only of the iteration, and ternary symmetries of the  3 arrows of time and its ternary symmetries in space and the 5th dimension

Indeed, we stress in T.Œ, the formula that resumes the ‘objective experimental elements’ of the scientific method: Œ=Sc³, whereas Œ stands for the Objective, Isomorphic, Logic reason that must guide the interpretation of the information obtained by any point of view through Experimental evidence. In that regard once more a single letter, Œ, breaks into the 3 elements it compose it: O,L,E.

Any œ point of view will absorb energy and convert it into information in its mind, adapting that evidence to its subjective, selfish point of view. This is natural to the equation of any mind and so a scientist is by no means immune to that bias. It is precisely the awareness that always we tend to bias information what guard us against all kind of ‘theories’ of reality, based in scanty data, or the use of a single language of truth (mathematics included) to evaluate that data. So truth is higher when more languages are used to evaluate truth, when more logic reason is included.

The organic paradigm stresses the multiplicity of Linguistic, Logic points of view – at least the 3 x 3 + 0 10 dimensional perspectives of the 3 scales and 3 space-time elements and the o-point that puts them all together.

Main symbols of i-logic Non -æxistential algebra

The formalism of the fractal ∆§t±¡ universe is ¡-logic Geometry and ¬Ælgebra (existential Algebra), the 2 most used terms to describe the topo-logic structure of a Universe of fractal spaces and temporal energy.

Existential Algebra is my favorite term, since the description of 5 Ðimotions with the symbolic equations of non-Æ, I-logic geometry, are about the ‘exist¡ential travels and troubles’ of any TimeSpace organism . So those are the wor(l)ds most often used. i-logic geometry and ¬Æxistential Algebra, being ¬Æ=¡, the best abbreviation.

The equations of ¬Æ are therefore the equations of Ðimotions taking place in time§paces.

And as any motion in a time space dimension, as per Klein, is a travel through it that requires the co-invariance of the equations involved, the general metric of any of the 5 Ðimotions, $t, ∑∏, §ð, ∂S & ∫T shall respond to that co-invariance, which we express generally as ST=K, when properly interpreting the symbols and parameters of those equations.

For example, V=s/t is a ¬Æ equation, which we must interpret better in terms of Ðimotions. As the expression is inboxed lineal time space, it needs to be reduced to a suitable ‘discontinuous time-space, which is given to us by the formula of fractal lineal motions of a wave, V = $(λ) x t (ƒ); and so we say that in the absence of any external force, the lineal inertia=speed of a system, its ‘locomotion’ (only one of the Ðimotions of space-time) remains co-invariant.

The co-invariance of each of the classic ‘present-simultaneous ‘Ðimotions makes the concept of Klein relatively trivial for the usual dimensions of space measured with the same clock of time (a second) and the same rod (meter in Galileo, c-speed in Einstein) of space of Einstein. As we do not change our time and space rhythms except precisely when we come closer to the limits of the ‘fractal plane of light spacetime’ which is our ‘background’ perceived plane as ‘huminds’, motions through length, height or width are trivial as obviously the meter x second rods remain invariant (with the help of Lorentz transformations for  closer to c-speeds).

Yet the concept becomes essential to fully grasp the different Metric equations of those Ðimotions.

Some logic elements of ®lgebra.

The dynamic=temporal view of ¬ælgebra is though only one element to take into account. We use the term algebra precisely because it refers to ‘fixed structures’ and it applies perfectly to a key concept of non-Æ, the ‘existence of blocks of time’, world cycles of existence form past to future, which are determined by the general Ðisomorphisms of space-time applied to each different family.

How many times of equation of Ðimotions of space-time there are, how much are related to the fractal generator, as all of them are sub-cases of the generator, how to connect them with the equation and laws of each science is the formalism of the stience of exist¡ences.

We call the logic behavior that gives birth to ‘super organisms in space’, simultaneity; to ‘time world cycles’ synchronicity and to new whole planes of existence, ‘emergence‘.

So the logic of the 3 fundamental elements of reality are described easily in a dynamic logic way. But it is still left the biggest of all mysteries, ‘perception’ and we have no ‘trick’ to know why perception happens. So we must consider a pan psychic universe made of two elements, which are beyond causality, hence the immanent two primary states of being; motion in time and perception of space. They must therefore be the ultimate substances of reality.

In different posts we have studied them. Here we shall within the Kaleidoscopic, entangled nature of the Universe, in which each dimension is perceived from the point of view of other dimensions, consider a logic approach to those proceses, to formalize with more rigor, the causal reason of space, time, scale and the underlying limits of pure motion and pure form/perception – the a priori substances of the Universe.

In those cases from the beginning of our inquire a fact will become self-evident: as space is ternary, time is made of 3 Ðimotions and scales bring multiple parts into wholes, simple causality, A-> B cannot account for reality.

The logic of the Universe is not Aristotelian A->B lineal, but ternary A<≈> B, where A, the relative past-entropy and B, the relative information-future, converge into a present mixed energy state.  So cyclical times becomes the basis of the ternary Non-Aristotelian logo of time in the Universe.

On the other hand, space is fractal broken by those time cycles in inner and outer regions, and by the singularity points or minds, in lower and higher scales born initially as seeds or mind-mappings that project the whole into the inner monad. So space is fractal made of scales and hence Non-Euclidean, as those points singularities and its volume of information are essential elements of the being,

Welcome then to the formal consequence of a cyclical time, fractal space Universe, its ternary Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean logic and geometry, which we ab. as ®=I-logic Universe (as I comes after a and e and it is the symbol of information.

Limits of humind sciences

Humind science is then handicapped by the incapacity of its practitioners to deal with the ambiguities of a multiple Rashomon effect on all systems, which at least will require a S-patial, formal, -T-emporal, moving, ∆§calar perception of its ≈ symmetries; and a reflective @-point of view of them all from an outsider mind, as all the information of the being is only within the being in itself, and humans can only access it through languages whose syntax reduces that information.

How the mind and its languages reduces reality has then to do a lot with ‘duality’ (the perception of inverse, S=1/T, contradictory forms) and trinity (its S≈T merging into an intermediate third form).

However humans are NOT aware of this relativism of knowledge and tend to reduce all those terms to a single one. I.e. they use T-duration, and care little for its inverse view as ƒrequency=1/T-duration, which reveals different angles on the concept of lineal vs. cyclical time. 

There is therefore an organic, inbuilt limit to the one-dimensions mind, which we call the Paradox of the Ego, as biological minds select information from its point of view and languages. We shall try to expand it in opposite fashion giving notice of those inverse dualities and ternary fusions of the elements of reality.

Now for you to understand ‘fast’ what we mean by trinity consider an immediate picture of it: the physical Universe conserves 3 quantities:

  • Lineal momentum, which is the motion directed by the will of the S@-mind with its formal spatial mapping of reality, moving lineally to achieve its ‘actions of existence
  • Angular momentum, which is the cyclical membrane of the being, seen in motion as a time clock, ∆ð, that separates the being’s internal vital space-time from the outer world and creates its ‘standing form’
  • Energy, which is the vital space enclosed by the angular momentum that balances both, S@, minds with lineal momentum-actions and ð-cyclical membranes, equating them: S@≈∆ð.

Those 3 ‘conserved quantities’ broken therefore into infinite vital space-time organisms, put together as a puzzle, give us the 3 absolute space-time quantities of physics. And they form the 3 elements of the fundamental topology of the Universe, a closed ball, where the open ball or visible part is the vital energy, while the membrane and singularity point or mind in its center are considered ‘something else’.

And as we move into larger scales we will find in all systems, a boundary from nations with borders to animals with skins, a mind-center or seed of information, from capitals and governments to DNA molecules; and in the middle a vital energy exploited by both, from military armies in the border and legal or financial informative people-castes in the capital exploiting the mass of population to black holes in the center of galaxies, enclosing a vital space of stars, with a halo of dark matter, likely strangelets, to use them as mitochondria of their reproduction, to your sensorial skin and brain exploiting your cells.

There is THEREFORE A VITAL ORGANIC PROPERTY TO THE 3 conserved fractal quantities of the Universe that ensemble into systems, and their properties are inverted regarding the ‘extended membrane of hardcore lineal proteins’ vs. the imploded singularity of informative warped DNA, which the middle vital energy pegs together.

So you can even understand death as the ‘separation’ of those two parts after exhausting the vital energy, so the membrane detaches warps, wrinkles and the singularity mind returns to its memorial repetitions, while the vital energy dwindles and as an old man you get all skin and memories…

VITAL processes are THUS the whys of all abstract topological configurations. And dualities and ternary symmetries are the elements that construct those configurations as all is yin yang and qi, that is motion, form and energy that combines them. Easy? Isn’t?

Ok, I know this for 30 years and nobody cares to understand so it is easy for me, but huminds are as we said one-dimensional, memorial, believers’ minds who only ‘think’ they think – sorry for the quips. FACT is reality needs no more than those 2 dual elements, spatial mental forms in simultaneity, the intelligence of reality and membranes of enclosed cyclical motions, clocks of time which deliver the cohesive strength of the systems; and in between the vital energy to sustain both.

So how huminds decided to reduce those dualities and trinities, and 5D symmetries into simplified one-dimensional actions?

The answer is you really can’t hold all the information- you will always loose information even if it seems irrelevant to you, as the Universe is ALL information and it does NOT fit in your mind – only a mirror image of it does – so you select it. So a better system of ‘full knowledge’ is the Rashomon effect and its expansion through the Disomorphic laws derived of space and time. In the future, as science expands thus the ONE-DIMENSIONAL LOGIC of modern Aristotelian and Euclidean thought will have to change for the Non-AE dual and ternary logic of these texts:

Hominids or robominds will have to deal as we deal nowadays with the complexities of quantum physics or mathematical inflationary multiple views, with the Rashomon and Diffeomorphic multiple analysis. I am aware I won’t see that happen, as I have no disciples and in the age of immediate rewards and simplifications, this in-depth upgrading wears the patience of the reader. 

Fact is the ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time.

The philosopher knows, the physicist sees.

So I could talk for ages of all those details, and solve all human questions to the extend human languages ‘perceive’ reality to question it…  but OBVIOUSLY  the would NOT be relevant to a physicist that CANNOT UNDERSTAND any property which is NOT mathematical…  given the limit of their VERBAL CONCEPTUAL BRAIN, highly ATROPHIED…

So yes mathematics IS  GREAT, if you understand MORE LANGUAGES TO FILL IT WITH CONCEPTS.

BUT it is NOT the only mirror-language. The languages of god are infinite, and all of them reflects in its still linguistic image-mind, in each god-singularity that speaks its mirror image that perceives the Universe:

O-singularity (still mind) x ∞ time cycles of the Universe = constant world.

It is that local constant world what then the singularity mirrors in reverse order in the territorial region it orders:

ie. infinite systems=monads are constantly STOPPING motions of time into mental SPATIal forms, and then ordering the World around them PROJECTING BACK THAT IMAGE-mirror, in inverse symmetry, as you do WITH YOUR PROPERTY, man with GAIA -FUKING IT UP, the black hole with ITS GRAVITATIONAL WAVES the galaxy the DNA with ITS RNA ORDERS, inverse images of its crystalized genes. etc. etc.

Atoms though are QUANTUM GEOMETRIES and so TOPOLOGY not ‘math’ DOES have a HUGE number of territories to order, specially in the lower ‘scales’ of reality. But not only math orders.

I.e. Ants order with pheromones its paths, women with the projection of its mind emotions their families, and above all languages, LOGIC not maths ORDERS and it is of a ‘higher order than human logic’ (Saint Agustine), which is ONE-DIMENSIONAL, LINEAL, ARISTOTELIAN while the Universe has a 5th dimensional Logic, way up to the limits of axiomatic methods, of which we give some hints on the articles on non-ae.

Now the problem with human physicists (not physics) is NOT that they don’t understand more than one language to be able to harmonize and mirror each language image into the other reaching the RASHOMON MULTIPLE VIEW-TRUTH of its sciences, according to the equation of truth in epistemology:

Max. Number of images-languages casted upon a being = Max. truth…

The problem is THEY ARE TOO ARROGANT to even realize they don’t UNDERSTAND and too prudish to go back to school.

The ego is too huge to recognize they ‘only know they know nothing’. Me, the philosopher of science? Just put enough conceptual verbal logic thought and visual ‘saper vedere intuition’ to their mix…

But as you are in the visual, Facebook age unfortunately this upgrade of humind knowledge is going to be a singularity… nobody cares for the blog, that I know.
But ROBOTS WILL neither. They will HAVE A VISUAL INTELLIGENCE, THEY WILL THINK ‘CREATING MOVIES’ they won’t talk. THEY WILL IMAGINE EVILWOOD GORE MOVIES AS MILITARY ROBOTS, the first to be born, already chase faster the red color, visual minds use to ‘code’ the function of entropy, to kill… they will be natural born eye-killers and chase down humans as targets of video-games call of duty fans a la Adam Lanza,… 
 
Verbal, cogito ergo sum thought peaks and dies it seems on those pages… 😷
But I did have a degree of communion with the entangled Universe that sufficed in itself. Because that is THE ULTIMATE MEANING OF KNOWLEDGE, WHICH IS NOT EXTERNAL TO THE MIND, NOT A PICTURE BUT A ‘THOUGHT’, SO THE TRUE SAGES do NOT need huge technological machines to know but huge IQs in multiple languages to SEE WITHIN the harmonies and symmetries of the Universe – from Aristotle through Leonardo through Einstein through…
WE KNOW WHEN WE KNOW BECAUSE IT IS WITHIN OUR PERCEPTION OF ENTANGLEMENT-HARMONY-NIRVANA between our language mirrors and the Universe… that is ALSO THE BEAUTY OF MATH, properly understood THE MOST perfect but not the only MIRROR…

A≈ @Å≈∆ ≈∀

ð≈S: TIME§PACE ÐISOMORPHISMS: DUAL, TERNARY AND 5D TOPOLOGIC STRUCTURES

But a pure spatial analysis is very limited beyond the first dimensions of the point moving and communicating information, as the essence of existence is social growth first in scales within a single plane (∆§) then in planes, ∆±i, which are not perceived directly as wholes or not perceived at all… So communication becomes then ore complex as the different planes of the being travel in search of bits of information and bites of energy, performing the..

Ðisomorphism: 5 a,e,i,o,u åctions: A series of actions of motion, information, reproduction, energy feeding and social evolution whose purpose is to ‘reproduce the information of the being and survive’, emerging as a larger super organism in a higher scale.

This IS the program of existence, a simple 5 dimensional action process, restricted by the fact the system is merely composed of two elements, space and time and its combinations, and the fact that those species who did not maximised its existence, and ternary elements, with those actions did not survive. So the program is not conscious but an automatic selection of the actions that ensure the survival of the being, 

In this manner the monad webs a reproductive and evolutionary process, from ‘minor to major’ starting from the seed of information or @mind, which will emerge through its actions and flows of bidimensional communication, growing within its world by absorbing energy and information, through its dynamic flows and actions, illustrated then with samples for the 3 FUNDAMENTAL classifications of beings of classic science:

  • ASTROPHYSICAL SCIENCES (∆i ≥|3|)
  • BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (∆i <|3|)
  • SOCIAL SCIENCES (∆º+1)

 This post thus shall study the seemingly less objective, objectively most essential of all events of reality, the five actions of exist¡ence that create reality as a discontinuous sum of infinite survival actions performed by infinite monads’ singularities.

The Rashomon TRUTHS on actions of space-time.

1st Ðimotion: informative particles/heads: §ð 2 Ð: limb/potential momenta: st.
3rd Ð: ∑e x ∏i: body waves: ∑∏, ST. 4th Ðimotion: entropy: ∂S. 5th Ðimotion: Organic evolution: ∫T.   The generator equation defines the Universe as a fractal sum of timespace super organisms, extended through 3 ∆±1 relative scales of space-time, ruled by 5D metric equations that render constant the product of the size in space and speed in time of the clocks of information of any system of Non-Æ points trough the 3 scales in which is possible to travel as an ‘existential being’, in the fifth dimension performing a world cycle. Since for a dimension to exist, there must be a co-invariant quantity, which allows its travel, S x T = K becomes the metric equation of ‘exist¡ence’. Its  constancy is also the origin of the organic nature of reality as it allows the symbiosis of a system through its 3 scales. The travel of existence can also be viewed topologically in a single plane, in which an organism ensembles and exchanges lineal momentum, energy and cyclical momentum. So we can define all systems as an ensemble of  lineal limbs/potentials that perform its lineal momentum, organised as herds of ∆-1 micro points (quantum atoms, cells) in superposed additive groups that move the system and dominate its young relative past age. Its second conserved quantity being its vital energy, distributed through  3 ∆o iterative, physiological networks, which define the organism proper able to iterate its form into a dynamic present system (thermodynamic matter, or multicellular organisms in physical and biological systems)… finally guided by a relative future particle-head that holds the linguistic mind or relative future survival will that guides and synchronises with its clocks the system as a whole in the external ∆+1 world; where it will perform 5, aeiou actions of ‘existence’ gauging I-nformation, to a-ccelerate=move towards a field of e-nergy in which to feed, to reproduce into an offspring of clones to evolve socially into a larger universal ∆+1 new plane or superoganism of 5Dimensional space-time actions parts, before it exhausts its vital energy, stops moving and explodes back into its entropic parts in its big-bang death. So we can define its 5Dimensions in time through its worldcycle of generation, from its ∆-1 seed that reproduces, evolves and emerges into the ∆º scale in which it will act with its 3 dimensional networks, the 1D point/head/particle, that moves in 2D planes to feed with 3D energy.

 

As usual we shall switch in our analysis between the 5 elements of all realities applied to the concept of actions using ‘ ideally’ different names for each perspective. The 5 different manifolds thus created with the Rashomon effect are:

Actions, Åctions, ∆ctions, ∀ctions or @tions, are the 5 verbal forms we shall use to study the will of the Universe,  as they depart from a singularity that controls the whole and perceive the super organism, enacting its actions of existence. Why different words are simple: we constantly use the ‘ternary method’ or Rashomon effect, explaining reality from ∆@s=t 3±1 Dimensional perspectives to reach the maximal quantity of truth:

Truth=one for the being in itself that holds all its information.

Max. Mind truth = Multiple languages and perspectives cast upon the same being.

So this comes into effect with the Rashomon effect of reaching higher truths with at least dual, ternary or pentadimensional perspectives, as reality indeed moves from potential into reality precisely when the system plugs into all the dimensions and becomes useful within the complex structure of reality performing all its 5D actions:

Thus for the ‘fundamental concepts of reality’, we try to create the kaleidoscopic perspective of the Rashomon effect, which comes from the classic film in which 4 views are needed for a mind-mapping to have a fifth @-whole view.

When applied to the program of existence and survival, we use then a ternary view with 3 ‘actions’ symbols:@tions, obviously considers the mind perspective…

∆ctions refer to the perspective of its scales, as those actions absorb pixels of different planes of reality…

S:Actions uses the quantifier for ‘all’ spatial populations, as all perform the same actions and so defines actions in terms of spatial, simultaneous synchronicities, in super organisms.

S≈ð: ctions, taken from the use in quantum physics consider then actions in relationship with the momentum of the system and its space-time symmetries.

ð: Åctions, therefore are the final symbol to study actions in relationship to the O-clocks of time. Such as the law of  minimal, least time ‘Lagrangian’ in which the system tries to achieve with actions.

And finally aeiou, will be the 5 different actions related to the Dimensions of the being and its scales of existence.

An action is therefore defined for all ∀cting being, as a Mind’s @ction that absorbs ∆±i bits and bites of different scales, to maintain the balance of the being, with the maximal efficiency, and minimal consumption of time for each åction.

I.

5 ST ÅCTIONS ON ∆±4 PLANES

Dimensions of time are discontinuous events=actions ≈arrows of time that are played by monads in discontinuous actions enabling the complex 5Dimensional ‘time-action-oriented’ program of existence. The five discontinuous time-space cycles or actions that all systems perform, become then the kaleidoscopic new vision of the five dimensions of time from another mind-monad perspective to grasp the whole synchronicity and simultaneity of it all.

As the sum of all the discontinuous five actions of all the monads of the Universe is also a program in itself that encodes all the relevant information of reality from the ‘active’, ab. å, @, point of view.

Actions as discontinuous fractal D(å)<1 dimensions of ðime§pace is an essential formal fact of reality. As we go on accelerating, energising, informing, and reproducing into new supœrganisms or socially evolving into Universals, the sum of the time-space spent in each of those actions will discontinuously amount during the finite duration of the being for a total 1-dimensional fractal sum, such as we can the portrait reality as an infinite tapestry of sum of fluid actions which happen from an ∆º±4 domain due to the ∆º actions of the being exchanging motion (å±4), energy (å±2), information (å±3), reproducing (å±1) and evolving socially, (å+)…

As the discontinuous cyclical dimensions=actions=arrows=events of time of the modular • being continue, the web of its discontinuous dimensions will become a mess, which has a point of origin, alpha and omega the • monad itself…

Å≈a,e,i,o,u:  ACTIONS OF SPACE-TIME. THE EXISTENTIAL PROGRAM OF THE UNIVERSE.

 

Actions – the subjective perspective of objective time arrows:

In the graph, the three arrows of timespace perceived in a single scale are equivalent to the three main ‘actions’ of energy feeding and entropy creation, informative perception or reproduction:

Actions are arrows perceived from the point of view of a ‘5D mind’ which acts with other scales of the fifth dimension to extract and exchange entropy and information. 

årrows of timespace and Åctions, Åre two sides of the same reality, the arrow is an objective more mathematical pictorial analysis, the actions is observed, mind-oriented, subjective, evolutionary view of the survival reasons by which the independent arrows are emitted by a will of a monad that tries to order its territory with it.

Actions are intelligent promoted by particle-heads-people castes in control of information, are ‘meaningful’. Arrows of time are more objective, geometric, detached of the will which is the last ultimate why and purpose: a mind reproducing, ordering a territory, perceiving, moving, feeding…

The arrow of time-space can always be decomposed in smaller actions of its fractal points, which together create a network action of certain magnitude as observed by an ∆+1 pov. The actions of the arrow=network then become physiologically added: ∑åctions=∑Årrows=∏N=Œω.

A SYSTEM exists guided by a singularity who apperceives, ∆i a field of energy, ∆e, towards which it will move, ∆a, to absorb that energy and reproduce, ∆œ into a complex social wave that become an organic network; in this eternal construction of pyramidal levels of reality:

In each scale of reality the growth of new wholes departing from parts is the embedded ‘secret’ intelligence and program of monads that become topological networks and mess into ternary wholes. And as such is the guidance also of history and social groups, species of individuals collaborating with each other – you name it. IT is the summit of the series of simple actions, perception->motion->feeding that derive into reproductive ones and self-organizative. Reproduction becomes then the ‘linking’ action of all of them, the summit of the first simpler needs – motion, perception, feeding – towards the higher goal of socially communicating and forming networks with other semi-identical beings.

Those 5 åctions in which the fractal point will be occupied, will be performed with its 3 2-manifold organic networks, the toroid limb fields of maximal entropic & energetic |-S motions, its cyclical, reproductive body, Ø-ST, and its spherical, informative head, O-T, perceptive motions. As it extracts and uses energy and information from its environment, reproducing that information as language and as body cell to create complex Universal 10n societies of maximal Population-momentum, P. P=An, means that any population of åctions, which goes through certain ‘magic numbers’ born of perfect tetraktys configurations, become wholes of higher scales, increasing the total momentum of the being.

A whole in that sense unlike a wave is measured by its momentum as the whole becomes a scalar undifferentiated boson entity in certain dimensions of existence. For example, mass is perceived as a whole and can be operated from a Gravity center, without much matter of waves. Light cannot.

The nature of the Universe is ambivalent, and this science has forgotten for very long by looking always from precise mathematical equations that ‘break’ reality into infinite jargons and miss the similarity of beings. Relational space-time works on the inverse mode of knowledge. It is not so much analytical as synthetic. So the tools of this science are those, which look for generalities more than individualities.

Thus what we call a fractal complementary system of space-times has different names. In mathematics will be a network of points; in biology a species; in quantum theory a Complementary particle/wave system, in physics a field of motion, in which a particle/wave system perform certain åctions.

That is, we live in a Universe made of complementary systems of energy (body/waves) and information (particles/heads), which perform a series of repetitive åctions in space-time (ST±4).

Thus the key elements of all beings are its ‘vital space with energy, Se, Sp’, its cycles of temporal form with information, ‘Tƒ, I’, which together create repetitive åctions of space-time, ST±4, RU±4, A±4.

Now the reader will notice the ambivalence of such of those terms. So we shall group them in 3 categories:

‘Space≈motion≈speed≈limbs/fields of energy’ x ‘Time≈form≈heads/particles of information≈cycles’ = spacetime≈ åctions ≈ body-waves.

For example, in mathematics we prefer topological concepts to geometrical ones, as topologies study ‘general forms with motion’; that is space-time forms. And so we shall define the properties of vital spaces in terms of topologies.

In time we prefer the concepts of frequency and cyclical, angular, rotary motions, or ‘cyclical clocks of time’, to the inverse concept of lineal duration. As cyclical time gives us much more information about the nature of those time cycles, and its phases/ages/horizons/frequencies. It is precisely in the understanding of time where relational space-time models give the largest jump on new science over the simplistic single-lineal time models of classic physics.

An enormous number of new laws of science are unveiled by studying instead of simplified T-time duration, the more complex concept of Tƒ, cyclical Time, even when we just translate a formula, by substituting T by 1/T=Tƒ (Frequency of a time cycle).

But by far the largest growth of knowledge applied to all sciences, is obtained from the understanding of the ‘scalar’ structure of those multiple vital spaces and time cycles that organize all systems of the Universe, what we call the metric of the 5th dimension.

Let us then study in more detail the 3 fundamental concepts of ∆ST: a topological bidimensional space with motion, with energy, which merges with cyclical motions in time, cycles of time, and together create åctions with energy and information that modify reality according to an existential game, a simple biological game of survival that all fractal complementary systems of spatial energy and temporal information perform: to exist as long as possible by absorbing energy and reproduce their own information beyond death.

We can consider all complementary systems made of dimensions of vital space with motion and cyclical time clocks also a biological being, in the sense that they all perform åctions, which can only be explained in their causal whys with the 5 classic biological drives of existence: Energetic Motion and absorption of energy for inner and outer motions perception of information, and repetition of the system’s information in similar system, and finally social organization of cellular systems into social groups.

This is the essence of the game, a Universe made of fractal systems of ‘topological vital spaces’, which move in repetitive time cycles, in search of 5 åctions that ensure its survival, ∆a (accelerated motions), ∆ï, informative perception of time cycles, ∆e: absorption of feeding energy, ∆œ, iteration of the individual system into an offspring and ∆U, social evolution.

Thus we can consider a simple pattern of creation: 3 topological vital geometries with motion cause 3 time ages as they develop their åctions of ‘energy and information’, organized in social groups.

This game of existence thus needs to explore in great depth the meaning of its S, T, ∆ components

Recap. 3 elements are the essence of the Universe of relational space-time:

The existence of ∞ quanta of space with motion, ‘Non-Euclidean fractal points’, which have a volume of energy and information, which they share and communicate forming more complex networks, worlds and Organisms.

The existence of 3 time arrows, a relative past of maximal motion or ‘entropy, death arrow’; the relative future, with more information, or ‘informative, life arrow’, and its combinations, the relative repetitive, present arrow that seems not to change, as systems are reproduced into similar present forms.

And the existence of infinite ‘Universal Planes’ (which we shall call ∆-planes, when measured in terms of its informative speed of time or u-planes, when measured in terms of its relative spatial size), which organize systems across scales of size, so all systems tend to exist in 3 ±∆ scales, the cellular/quantum, individual/organic and social/cosmic planes, exchanging energy and information between them.

In reality our existence is made of a series of actions of space-time, ∂(a,e,I,o,u), that is actions of motion, energy feeding, information, reproduction and social evolution into Universals, which are performed in cyclical and synchronized patterns; and the sum of all those actions, conform a worldcycle of existence between birth and death.

Thus once more we observe that by analyzing in greater detail the frequency and form of those cycles instead of ‘gathering’ them together into a single duration, we loose an enormous quantity of information about the life-death cycle or motion or actions of a being.

Thus the study of cyclical space-time actions, its forms, purpose, duration and its sum into the worldcycle of existence of different beings, is an entire new discipline of knowledge that completes the simplified analysis of ‘physical motions’ with lineal time.

In that regard, as always in the study of the fractal universe, a ‘bio-topo-logical’ system, of ‘scalar-space-time’, 3 ‘formal sciences’ and parameters are fundamental to the study of space-time cycles.

– Bio-logy, which defines the actions of existence, and the purpose of those space-time cycles.

– Topo-logy, which studies the form of those space-time cycles and its changes of internal topological forms.

– And causality, which studies the beginning, steady state, and conclusion of any space-time cycle and action that goes through those stages, from the simplest accelerated, steady-state, decelerated motion, to the more complex cyclical actions of space-time (reproduction and social evolution of information, of form, which ties multiple ‘fractal points’ and synchronizes them into bigger social organizations).

Regarding its parameters, we have 2 fundamental mathematical tools to study all those actions and Time cycles:

-The study of the form or topological varieties, of which the 3 2-manifold varieties (elliptic, toroid and planar geometries) will be fundamental.

– And the measured of the frequencies of those time cycles .

Since those time cycles store the information of the Universe in its form and frequency (ie.: a better informative computer is one which runs to faster Gigahertzs).

Thus the study of time cycles is a discipline fully within the realm of both mathematical physics, biology and philosophy of science, given the fact that all systems of the Universe perform space-time cycles. Of which the most important is the life-death world cycle of all beings, born, evolved through 3 ages and dying back to the seminal and atomic scales in which they were born.

So this post deals with space-time cycles, and specially with the fundamental time cycle of the Universe, the worldcycle of life and death that integrates all the cyclical actions (∂a, e, I, o, u) of a system from birth to extinction.

If we were to use the main operations of fractal space-time, derivation and integration. We would define as usual, a system of relational space-time as one which puts together the lineal and cyclical motions, space and time parts of a being, measured by its existential momentum. That existential momentum then can be derived into a series of forceful actions, in which the entity exchanges energy and information with their bigger absolute space-time world in which it is immersed, through exchanges of ‘existential momentum’. And the sum of all those actions, its integration along the path of space-time of the being forms its worldcycle.

Since energy is the integral of momentum the best parameter to measure the existential worldcycle of a being is through its changes of energy along its entire life.

And since ‘information’ form is the inverse function of energy’, (a definition that we shall fine-tune for different systems with slightly different equations and concepts such as cyclical form≈ information and entropy), the best parameter to measure a worldcycle is through the different amounts of energy and information of a system, which will display a first age of maximal energy, an age of balance between its energy and information and a 3rd age of minimal energy and maximal information, whose total integration will give us the entire worldcycle of the being.

Yet, the mathematical description of the existential momentum of a beings, its derived actions of space-time (created through its existential forces) and its integration into a whole worldcycle of energy and information is only relevant for the simplest world time cycles of physical systems, where, œ (existential function) ≈ Mv or qevS (I) that is mass-momentum or charge momentum; its actions are measured by derivatives of that existential function ∂œ ≈ (∂a, e, I, o u) ≈ Forces, and its kinetic energy and potential energy (information) by the integrals of its momentum (1/2 mv2, mgh and so on).

For all other systems it is much better to take the concepts of energy and information in conceptual terms and describe qualitatively the internal space-time cycles, actions and events of a being along its entire life and death worldcycle. In that regard the reader should always understand that relational space-time is a theory in which the 3 main languages of thought, geometrical, mathematical descriptions, biologic organic analysis and causal languages apply, but as we move upwards and downwards towards the U=5 plane of existence of mankind, the mathematical description is secondary to bio-logical analysis.

In any case, we do use very often the jargon of physics because it has taken over the biological, evolutionary jargon of biology regarding time analysis

So for the time being, the biggest difference between physical theory of absolute space-time and relational space-time is:

Absolute space-time simplifies and unifies all space-time cycles into a single duration.

It only studies a single space-time continuum of the multiple space-times of the 5th dimension and ignores its order according to the 5D metrics (Max. S = Min. Tƒ: maximal size, minimal speed of clocks cycles).

And so it considers only 4D and defines the existence of beings as a simple world line as in 4D.

Whereas relational space-time adds a 5D of ‘depth’ according to those metrics. Smaller beings run faster time cycles and accumulate more information. And this explains life as a travel through scales of the 5th dimension. Since all systems are born as seeds of information in a lower scale of spacetime, in the process of birth. Then from that ‘lower scale of faster time cycles’, the cellular seminal scale, the system through a series of actions of energy feeding, informative reproduction and social organization (∆e, ∆o, ∆u) emerges into the world-plane of organic existence, where it lives through 3 ages/horizons/states of increasing transformation and expenditure of its potential energy into kinetic energy, which makes the system accumulate information, towards a state of minimal energy.

This in physics is called ‘entropy’, the loss of function energy, and also, the law of minimal action, the search for a state of maximal form and minimal motion.

In biology is called the passing of life towards a 3rd age of information.

In sociology, the growth of complexity of information and development of information.

And so after the 3 ages, the worldcycle exhausts all its potential and kinetic energy, and becomes warped into a system of information, that ends with death when information explodes into energy, the form of the system disappears, and the organism, descends 2 planes of the 5th dimension, till becoming energy for a new cycle (big bang in matter, death and predation in nature.

And so we explain with those world cycles for life, humans, and matter, from birth to death, all its actions and forces, energy and information, in a sequential manner, which is the equation of life and death, probably the most important equation of the Universe.

If time is cyclical, hence clocks of time close into themselves, dividing the Universe in an infinite number of fractal vital spaces (the space including by the time cycle – 1st postulate of knot theory – vs. the space outside the time cycle); and further on time cycles run at different speeds, the Universe is indeed a relational multiple space-time Universe made of infinite time cycles.

And the proof of this, is the fact that time cycles run at different speeds in the Universe.

The order of all those time cycles is the origin of the 5th dimension and its ‘fractal generator’ of time cycles and broken space – the metric equation of the 5th dimension that relates the size in space and  the speed of its cyclical forms, its clocks of time, (or in terms of transfer of spatial motion and temporal forms, the quantity of energy and speed processing information of a system, in all the scales of reality.)

Sp x Tƒ= ∆ IS the key equation of 5D  metrics: larger systems (the galaxy) run slower time cycles than the smaller ones, the human i-scale, which runs slower than the cells in the right, which run much faster its atomic clocks. This law explains in decametric scales (the graph is taken from Eames’ film ‘potencies of 10’), the structure of the Universe, and so it is the key to unify all sciences.

Clocks of time run at different species according to size, being faster, hence processing more information in smaller planes, explains an infinite number of facts, from the Chip evolution (Moore’s law, if you half the size which we do every 2 years, the chip runs twice more time-cycles or Hertzs of potency), to genetics (smaller systems store more information in the frequency and form of its cycles, and that is why genetics codes slower humans and not the other way around)

This is possible because there is a fundamental property to those scales of space-time, the ‘law of informative vortices’, that is, the smaller we become the faster our clocks of time go. So atoms beat trillions of time per second and galaxies, turn once every 100 billion years and the entire universe maybe has an even larger big-bang rhythm. Between those limits, man beats once a second, both its informative brain (a thought and glimpse of the eye every second) and its heart beat, and measures around 1/1000th of a mile in space.

Those are our rhythms of processing time information and the vital space we occupy. But as we become smaller, time clocks beat faster and space becomes reduced according to a generic vortex law: V x Ro = K, that is the smaller a clock cycle is the faster it turns:

The 5th dimension representation of the ‘arrows of time’ now across several scales of size explains a basic fact of social organization: Information moves from the lower scale (genes and memes in socio-biological scales) to the upper scale (organisms) and energy moves from the upper scale of maximal size-space to the lower scale. And the result is that all systems of the Universe co-exist in 3 scales whose relationships organize the existence of beings.

And so we observe that ∆-1 parts become wholes of a higher scale thanks to those flows, the synchronicities they create and the specialization of smaller faster beings in information and larger ones in energy. So particles can code and become atoms that give them flows of energy and gather together into molecules that gather into planets and cells that evolve into solar systems and organic systems that evolve into galaxies and social super-organisms…

The hierarchical, scalar nature of the Universe, and its duality of time arrows, as opposed to a description of a Universe with a single space-time scale and a single time arrow (Euclidean, Aristotelian current model of physics) represent a huge advance in our understanding of the ultimate elements of reality, space (static vision) or energy-motion (Moving vision) and time (moving, cyclical vision) or information (static vision).

We use normally for the 5th dimension the symbol ∆, in terms of time dynamics, which are more hierarchical as it is indeed an arrow ‘head’ put upwards, to symbolise time themes of the space-time fifth dimension.

We shall use, ∑, with its ‘summitry of populations sense, its 3 planes (the one in the middle merely suggested, and its five vertex points and perimeter – one opened) as a good symbology to understand the fifth dimension in space. And finally when studying 3-dimensional super organisms, we talk of 3 organic Ξlanes and use the greek beautiful symbol for those 3 organic planes with the self in its center.

The concept of existential force: momentum and the sum of all energies.

‘Existential force’ will be then defined in physics by momentum, M(Tƒ) x Se (V) = ST. And it is the essential parameter of the physical Universe, being the laws of conservation of lineal momentum (Dominant in Se-lineal, entropic motions) and Cyclical momentum (dominant in Tƒ, cyclical motions) but both having a ‘bit’ of the other, yin and yang, Mv=ST, the fundamental expression in physics of the Generator Equation.

In that regard, the definition of energy as 1/2 Mv2, will be clearly related to momentum. Its derivative respect to speed, is indeed the momentum (∂Sp/∂v=mv).

And this is what really energy is all about, which will become more clear if the reader goes through the mathematical sections of this blog (not yet put up), in which we discuss in depth the fascinating matter of the meaning of ‘operandi’, such as derivatives, integrals, potencies, polynomials and other fundamental quantitative modes to describe the different emergent processes between planes of existence.

Here what the derivative of energy in terms of motion, v, means, is that when a system with an existential force or momentum, transfers part of that existential force, Mv = Se x Tƒ to another being, as a ‘speed’,  it can only transfer a quantity of it, with ‘one dimension less’ of it.

Derivatives thus skim a dimension in its transfer, as you would take the surface of cream on the volume of milk. Thus we cut down a polynomial factor, ∂ x² =  2 x, from energy to momentum, and then if we derivate again, we cut again the v factor and are left with the mass-form of the system. Thus energy->momentum->Mass, skim away the spatial entropic motion of a being in two dimensional steps down leaving us with the pure form of the species. It follows that 3 ‘degrees’ of analysis of spatial motion/’Ðimotions’ are:

  • Pure space-motion without the mass factor. Its first combination or existential force, M(tƒ) x Se(V), which is the constant conserved by all systems, as it balances both ‘Ðimotions’ and form, and finally, adding more ‘dimensions’ of motion to the mix, kinetic energy, which having more motion, gives as ‘more force’ (another mixed magnitude with more of Se than Tƒ, but in an accelerated manner F=ma) to be able to transfer momentum.

 

And this is what we describe in this section of the web, the program of the Universe…

Γunction of existence: Max. ∑EXI=ST

THE GENERATOR EQUATION AS AN EXISTENTIAL FUNCTION: EXI≈S±Tº

All what we have said can be simplified ad maximal with an equation of survival, Max. e x i ±s=tº, that is a logic equation that establishes a mandate of actions of energy and information, entropic space and temporal clocks:

to maximize the spatial entropy, energy and information and temporal clocks of the being and its balanced combinations in body, limbs and heads/particles.

So if we define the energy of the being and its information, forms in action (momentum steps) as the present value obtained by superposition of the spatial entropy and temporal information of the being:

exi = (S±t), we obtain normally an integral or derivative function between two scales of the fifth dimension from where some basic mathematical laws of ¬Æ can be established.

We write this conceptual equation in many forms, as it is ultimately another mirror image of the generator, and its three parts. I like the acronym (if you haven’t noticed GST accepts all languages as symmetric mirrors of reality, and specially enhances the concepts of verbal thought – the way humans ‘understand’).

So e x i, entropy x information, or energy x information (energy being entropy with some form), represents the body-wave, dominant present systems of any super organism, which is maximised when e=i (s=t, if we use the alternative concepts of space and time).

To maximize exi at the balance point (s=t), of maximal communication between body and brain is the fundamental strategy of survival of a system (as the product a x b is maximal, for any a+b = C in the point where a=b).

Systems thus try to maintain itself in the point of balance, and serve its body-wave to iterate the system and reproduce and make the present immortal the momentum-energy of the system conserved…

But how a system achieves that goal? Obviously absorbing an emitting, the three elements of the system through actions that exchange entropy, energy and information with the outer world.

So we also talk of an action of ‘entropy and information’, of ‘space and time’ of ‘energy’, as the fundamental event of existence of all beings; something which in physics is quite established since Planck found quantum beings are made of h-actions, a ratio of spatial entropy-motion and time-information: e=hv…

(The reader should excuse the ambivalence of the language of scientists, which is carried often in this blog to avoid constant explanations; as entropy and energy are constantly confused so are form and information… entropy is pure motion with no form, form is pure information with no motion, energy is entropy with little form: Max. e x min. ƒ, and information is form-in-action, form in motion, Max. ƒ x Min. e; so in equations such as e=mc², actually e is entropy not energy as it destroys the mass-form – a vortex of information into an explosion that erases it.)

To exist imply to make combinations of arrows of time, which I call ‘tensors’ of existence as they come from the function, and its ternary symmetries.

And the question of how many events are allowed To exi=st is the first question of algebra of existence, which we formalise with a mix of conceptual logic verbal thought and classic equations as we go along translating the meaning of the common function of mathematics, the language that better reflects the structure and events of space-time beings.

Actions are thus evident once we realise we just start algebra with simple combinatorics, of  3±∆ elements, often associated to a few mathematical numbers notably 4 constants, π, the constant of cycles, phi & e the constant of inner and outer growth & 10, the social constant; along the number for the whole 1 and for the infinitesimal, 0 and the bidimensional number of a motion in time from entropy to information, i.

∫ e x i SURVIVAL ACTIONS ≈ ∑Æ,œ,ï,ø,û

Stience studies only what ∃xists, ‘functions of existence’.

But what makes something to exist as opposed to not? What are the rules of creation of beans and conservation of them? What is the program of survival of species once created, to endure in the Universe?

THIS THE HUGE VITAL PART OF THE UNIVERSE – THE FACT THAT THE ABSTRACT LAWS OF BEHAVIOR AND GROWTH IN TIME AND SPACE can be reduced to a series of survival actions, performed from a point of maximal information or dimensional mind of the system. We can talk of a Universe of vital organic systems, made of dust of space-time, seen inwards also as complex systems, fluctuating, traveling through scales of existence but seemingly all performing the same game, the function of survival, ∃, which determines all what is stience, that is all functions in which there is at least one form in existence, normally described by the generator and its ternary symmetries:

∃ sπecies ≈ Γst¡

becomes then the existential function of any form or being, which will follow the generator ternary topologies of the formalism of GST. All is within the formal description of an ‘inflationary language’, which in fact we shall reduce further by  experience into what it is real.

So a huge part of any system is to have a mind which understands the game of existence and allows the system to play it and survive.

Thus what physicists likely would deny we consider a tenant of truth: The UNIVERSE IS FILLED WITH MAXWELLIAN DEMONS ORDERING REALITY.

HOW THEY DO IT? With different ‘intelligences, which however share an evolutionary ‘survival function’ embed in all of them, Œ, the organic function of existence, the strategy of survival we call the LEGO game of the Universe, the Generator game of super organisms.

This is what the Universe does: Superorganisms departing from ∆-1 finitesimal dust of space and time, integrated in time and space through networks which all finally create superoganisms.

The mind is NOT that game though, it is a different less vital thing – a still mapping of reality and algorithms of survival, action-oriented attached to the mapping.

The answer is that present reality is made of actions of entropy and time, which therefore need both to exist, but mind stiences are pure information, and its existence. if real, would form the substrata of all other scales. But in the existence we give it to this sheet of information is provided forcefully by the author’s mind with a minimal bias…So we do NOT talk of mental existences as we talk of astrophysical, biological or sociological systems whose functions of existence are obviously real.

WE MUST REMEMBER THIS: STIENCE IS ONLY CONCERN WITH WHAT EXISTS AND IS REAL (EINSTEIN).

So departing from this law, the function of existence

Γ. ∃xi≈sT

AND ALL its symmetries and generators is the origin seed of information that gives birth when ‘restricted’ by the limits of energy – boundaries of the problem, to a limited number of integral space and time solutions.

The finding of integrals thus means the finding of solutions in the emergence of a larger scale of a function of existence.

The universal ‘algorithm’ of existence is a rather simple function: Max. ∑ e x i ds dt, which encodes the point of balance and immortality of any system of the Universe. Its study is the essential element of Ælgebra (existential algebra), the i-logic, mathematical model that develops the rules for that function to be defined in the domain of any space-time being. Certain domains will not host the function and do not exist. There are many jargons to express this truth.

I found the simplest and more telling to be the one of the title: e x i | s≈t, whereas the 3 parts of the system, its ∆-1 spatial background, its e xi body-wave ∆- system of energy and information and its temporal, ∆+1 mind system in balance with the field from where it extracts its energy and information; become a ‘whole function of exi=stience in time and space, ‘extracting from space’ the entropy motion and from time, the i-logic form required to imprint the body-wave of present

To exist in present, the body-wave thus needs to be in a relative balance with its world ecosystem and have a ‘mind imprinting’, a will to survive and perform its actions over that field… As it does so, through small steps trying to maximise its energy and information, Max. ∑ e x i, with the restriction imposed by any product function (e≈s, i≈t, Max. e x i| s=t), the function of existence will develop into an integral world cycle, where the maximal function will be ‘cheated’ in 3 points, as it turns the wheel of existence, the wheel of the world cycle: Max. e (youth) e=i (adult hood) and max. i (3rd age), before it dies into a zero sum.

The frequencies and scales of time speed of the Universe

A definition in brief of the 5th dimension illustrated in the next graph will be:

‘The 5th dimension is the dimension of spatial size (abb. Se) and speed of temporal clocks (Abb.Tƒ). Both parameters are inverted: when systems grow in size the speed of its time cycles slows down and vice versa. Smaller clocks tick faster and bigger ones tick slower, as it happens in galaxies, human beings or DNA.’

In most systems, the product of the information and size of the system does not vary. And this dual invariance or co-invariance, Se x Tƒ =K is what defines the geometry and laws of the 5th dimension. In this simple form is equivalent to Einstein’s metric of the 4th dimension, the famous S – (ct)2 equation:

In the graph we illustrate that co-invariance which is the origin of the ISOMORPHISMS of all the scales of reality. And so now we must define the 2 elements of the 5th dimension – the multiple clocks of time and scales of space that co-exist in every part of reality.

The  image, taken from a film called ‘powers of ten’ by Eames, show this astounding fact: the speed of time-clocks, Tƒ, which are anything that ticks and turns, multiplied by the size of the space they occupy, Se, is constant, Se x Tƒ =K. And this fact allows the camera to travel through the 5th dimension by shrinking or enlarging your size, with the result that if you see the film you will NOT distinguish your travel outwards, growing in size in the 5th dimension from a normal travel in the 4th dimension, WITHOUT changing scale of size or speed of clocks (we have added in our pictures the change in time speed, Tƒ, which Eames did not know).

Now let us start with a classic definition of all what we have said about ‘DIMENSIONS’ based in their study from a still point of view of the structure of space-time.

It is the definition of a ‘geometry’ by one of the foremost mathematicians of the turn of the XX century, Mr. Klein, who in his famous ‘Erlangen Program’ defined many of the future advances of mathematics.

He said that…

‘A Geometry is the study of the invariant properties of a space(time), under motions within itself’.

Klein said the same we said, using the term ‘invariant’ instead of still point of view, and space, instead of the modern concept of space-time as the ultimate ‘dual’ substances of a dimension.

So the next paradigm studies the invariant properties of the 5th dimension. And now we can define the 5th dimension geometry using that definition, by asking ourselves, what truly does not change when we move from scales of size in the Universe, from the infinitely small to the infinitely large?

Obviously we change our size in space, from galaxies to atoms. So nothing seems to remain invariant, and that would eliminate our pretension of studying a 5th dimension of spacetime…

But wait a minute we have said ‘spacetime’, not only space. So even though size changes in space, perhaps there is also a change in clocks of time that ‘balances’ the change in size on space, so the product of both, the change of size in space and the change in the speed of time-clocks balance each other? 

As it happens this is the case and this known property of time clocks that turn much faster when they shrink in spatial size, so atoms move billions of time faster than galaxies is the fundamental ‘still point of view’ observed when we travel through the 5th dimension.

Now in science when something doesn’t change, and that something is composed of two terms, we call it a co-invariance. So we are talking of the geometry of the 5th dimension as the study of the co-invariance of time clocks & space scales.

Then we shall define the ‘first, principal co-invariance of the 5th dimension’ Se x Tƒ = K

Latter we will find out then that there are many other co-invariant combinations of energy-motion and in/form/ation-time that do not change in the Universe as we travel through scales of size, things so fundamental to our existence and nature, as our life-death cycles, or our åctions, or our organic forms.

Each ‘family of species’ and each relative ‘scale of the Universe’ has a different Se x Tƒ = K equation, giving birth to the astounding variety of Universal species. Such equation however becomes in a Universe in which we are made of spatial energy and temporal information, the most important equation of each species. And within that species remains mostly invariant. The same happens between all the derived species of that relative membrane of space-time.

The use of infinite clocks to measure time rhythms in the Universe is a theory of multiple spaces-times, whose parameters of Temporal Information and Spatial energy, surprisingly enough follow a simple mathematical law, Se x Tƒ = K, from where the order and structure of all the parts of the Universe can be deduced.

In the graph, different scales of the 5th dimension; the ‘real’ infinite quanta of spatial energy and bits of temporal information of the Universe, and 3 complementary systems, Se x Tƒ, made of ‘energetic bodies/fields’ and informative ‘particles/heads’ from physical sciences (a light field-photon particle), from biological sciences (a human body-eye system) and from economic sciences (a weapon-camera system).

Since the Universe is a fractal of infinite complementary systems, made of energy and information, whose ‘common’ properties are the field of study of the 5th dimension.

Tƒ facilitate the transition from absolute 4D single space-time continuum to relational, fractal multiple 5D space-time, we shall consider in some post the relationship between 4D Einstein’s metric and 5D Metric.

Since the classic model of physics and its 4th dimension is merely one of those ‘planes of space-time’, the one humans perceive as information and energy, made of light space-time. This plane was described by Einstein’s special relativity and Maxwell’s electromagnetic equations. And their equations can be reduced easily to the general equation of the metric of space-time, where the space-time constant is obviously the speed of light, as light waves is the ‘substance’ that makes up our galactic space-time, filled with light, even when we eliminate all objects (light background radiation).

So either in Einstein’s metric or Maxwell equations, when we interpret properly the meaning of its parameters of ‘external space and time’ and translate them into parameters of ‘internal space-time’, we obtain a similar equation:

√µ xe = c, whereas the electric and magnetic constants represent the relative ‘temporal clock-like vortex’ (electric charges) and relative, spatial, lineal motions (bipolar magnetic currents, which do NOT have monopoles, that is vortex, but always flow between two points, the north and south pole) whose products remains co-invariant, constant.

So we can consider Maxwell’s equation for the description of the 4Dimension ‘membrane’ of light space-time, a variety of the 5D metric: S(µ) x T(e) = ST±3: C

Whereas ST±3 is the constant space-time of light in which we are immersed.

The profound implications of that translation of 4D into 5D for XXI c. physics, and the enlightenment of many unresolved questions about the structure of the Universe will occupy many pages of our posts dedicated to astrophysics, universal constants, and the ST0±3 galactic/light space-time.

And we shall explain in the analysis of the bidimensional 2-manifolds made with a space and a time dimension that build, layer upon layer, in holographic fashion the 4D Universe, also how the new metric explain better relativity, its Riemannian Geometry and the spooky effects of time dilation, mass increase, length contraction and c-speed.

THE ORDER OF THE 5 DIMOTIONS IN ALL SYSTEMS: FROM PERCEPTION TO LOVE.

An essential theme that is often ‘hidden’ by the multiplicity of jargons of all disciplines, is the ‘guidance’ of the survival program and the priority between the 5 Dimotions, which explain a ginormous number of phenomena and ‘changes’ on the steps and actions of a beings, which goes as follows:

All systems perceive at the bottom of the pyramid, hence perception contrary to belief is the less desired of all dimotions – no motion at all.

Then the system will move through locomotion towards a field of energy in which to feed, by perpendicularity. So motion is the second hierarchical action, and feeding on perpendicular energy the third.

This leaves the complex reproductive, ‘mirror symmetry’ and social love as the most desired, yet more difficult to achieve goals of existence, in the proper Maslow pyramid:

 

And this applies to the choices that a given object will make in its ‘modular’ change of actions.

For example, the perpendicular repulsion that two electrons suffer ‘afraid’ of cancelling its wave-forms (Pauli exclusion principle) breaks in Cooper Pairs of superfluidity, when their inverse spins entangle into a ‘couple’ by chiral mirror symmetry. It is essentially the arrow of reproduction, as two entangled spins with enough energy can reproduce bosons and even other fermion. Yet this might be broken by the ‘penetration of a magnetic field, which will put into a social conjunction all the electrons.

Thus what a mechanical view of the Universe deems absolute (the repulsion between electrons) is broken first by the complementary mirror symmetry of Cooper pairs, and then further on by the social co-evolution under a magnetic field.

Yet the choice between couple pairing and social network often is contradictory, so women prefer the coupling through mirror symmetry, but sterile men prefer the social gathering of larger numbers. So happen in the previous example in which the cooper pairing produces a superficial constant current that expels the magnetic field (Meissner effect). Its mathematical description being the how of the deeper how of its hierarchy range between Ðimotions of existence.

Thus the two social reproductive arrows however are often exclusive and so we find sexual reproduction and clone reproduction, mirror  symmetry in dissimilar forms and social evolution in identical forms with minimal asymmetry (notably spheres and points, which become indistinguishable elements of a network or Plural ‘nuclei’ of a wave).

It is then necessary to make use of the laws of existential algebra that define all the relationships between Ðimotions of space-time, even if they might seem abstract, as they are the realization of the hierarchies between Ðimotions born of the survival program of the Universe, which we repeat is NOT absolute mechanical as many physicists pretend but must be put on the context of each local symmetry.

The super organism, as an entangled system…

in which the 5 elements of the being scales, time, space, minds, and all together as an entropic ∆@st are in constant creative trans-formation.

The ¡logic of the 5гisomorphic fractal Universe is kaleidoscopic, pentagonal, which given the fact that each non-E point-monad is merely @ristotelian, with a single A->B logic, it makes rather difficult to explain it. So we shall try, and to that effect we shall use an ¡logic concept, the ‘Rashomon effect’.

What all this means is that the 5 elements of reality, Space, Time, scales, minds and the entropic destruction of them all, ARE NOT isolated elements but all of them are entangled, perceiving each other in kaleidoscopic forms. 

The metric of the 5 Ðimotions of time§paces has properties that are entangled albeit expressed in different manners by the different languages that perceive them. The 5 Dimotions differ topo-logically, as both its geometry in motion (topology in space)  and logic causality in time  is different. For example a Darwinian event implies the cutting through perpendicular geometries tearing the variety of our topological organs, predated; an act of communication requires on the other hand a parallel motion to allow communication at equal distances of the subtle, ∆-3 pixels an ∆º mind uses to that aim.

When we study the actions of survival across scales, their functions and perspective also differs from the sadistic ministrations we make to the oysters we ‘love’ to torture with lemon to the view the oyster terrified will have in its inner point of view of the monster that eats her alive; and finally in the last layer of reality, perception itself of sensations that reinforce the program of actions, it is a different sensation of exhilarating pleasure an entropy action, that the acute pain of informative knowledge of truth, or the pressure-pain associated to the social evolution into choking herds that inflict order upon us.

All those layers of reality are related to the four elements of the being, its space, its time, its scale and its mind, which provide simultaneous, topological; sequential-logic; sensorial, perceptive and organic biological ± prey-predator scalar elements to all functions of existence.

However as we are representing here the 5 ðimotions of existence in terms of logic thought and structures, which will be of great usefulness to discuss logic questions of algebra and existential thought, certainly the view of this article will deal in I-logic terms with our new symbology.

Lets us then briefly define them in the sequential order in which a cycle of exist¡ence happens as we perceive i-nformation to move a-ccelerating towards a field of feeding e-nergy, which will be used to reproduce o-rganically an o-ffspring of similar forms and evolve socially to u-nite into a u-niversal whole…

And each of those actions will be related to all others, in the entangled Universe provoking:

5 e-motions. So when we talk of information and perception, it is of 5-varieties related to each of the 5 elements of reality, which we define with 5 e-motions, each for one sensorial perception of the other 4 elements: Reproductive pleasure, acute perception, eusocial love, destructive hate, exhilarating motion… all those perceptions and its subtle variations are ultimately the ways in which the I-nformative Ðimotion sees the other ones.

The element which seems more difficult to introduce within the entangled multi-property Universe is under the ego paradox of restricting e-motions to human existence, that final level of sensations, which in the new terminology that tries to show the entangled relationship of all elements are to be called e-motions.

Initially I wanted to use e-moticons for them and generally I would consider it, if they were available for this keyboard. Then we could talk of 5 e-motions, parallel to the 5 Ðimotions, parallel to the 5 logic suits, parallel to the 5 aeiou actions and 5 topological dimensions and 5 time motions and 5 organic functions… of exist¡ence. They are though only available in hotmail. So they would be, as taken from hotmail’s list, providing 2  and explaining them:

😇,,  O>:  : for the fifth e-motion of social love. They both have the ˆ, of ascension to the fifth dimension.

😈, (<:  For the fourth e-motion of entropy. Obviously the exhilaration of entropy, which however destroy us needs a devil e-moticon.

😳,   O-:  For the 1st e-motion of stopping information. Information stops for perception, opens your eyes, it is though not happy, often painful. S

😍, Ø=:  For the 3rd e-motion of reproduction. Love symbols or converging ones >< as those are the ¡-logic symbols for happy reproduction.

😎,  |-: For the second e-motion of locomotion, the most stupid of all Ðimotions, mechanical and mindless – so the higher function of thought – the eyes, are somehow lost.

It follows for those who don’t have the nice yellow emoticons, we can use the hand ones.

5 loco-motions. From the lack of it, in the informative stop, to the steady  locomotion, to the decelerating motion of entropic dissolution, to the SHM, back and forth motions of reproductive actions, to the accelerated inwards motions of social evolution into a TIGHTER higher whole.

As all is connected and all is entangled the variations of events and forms born of the 5 elements or rather 3 ±¡ (given the clear oppositions between entropic actions and social evolutionary ones; between locomotions and information; whereas only reproduction in present seems to bring the 5 dimotions together) at a logical level the best way to express reality is through those oppositions:

4 vs. 5: Decelerating Entropic, 4th dimotions vs. Accelerating Social, evolutionary 5th Ðimotions. We can consider such oppositions to be the most extreme of reality hence we use the concept of antisymmetry for them, symbolized by the ‘warrior’ symbol of ♠ for entropy and the ♥ symbol for social evolution.

1 vs. 2: Stop, informative perception vs. Lineal locomotion. We consider such relationships to be alternate as in the processes of stop and go, perception and motion that are common to locomotion when fully understood as a combination of ‘form and motion’ (wave length and frequency). So the level of opposition is not so extreme and it is NOT a single event so often destroying its ‘repetitive nature’, and as such we can consider them disymmetric and use the suit of diamonds♦, to represent it.

3: Reproduction, which includes in its complex form the other 4 Ðimotions. And so we need a combined mixture of all those processes. 

The concepts of entropic deceleration, social acceleration, static position for information, steady motion for locomotion, and its full combination for reproduction would be in physical terms, the most proper way to describe the 5 Ðimotions, as states of motion in themselves.

5 Iterations. As inflationary languages reproduce infinite views of the same Universe, locomotions happen as adjacent reproduction of the being which repeats its in-formation as it moves, reproduction proper implies a motion in the 5th dimension from seed to whole, and entropic reproduction is the mirage of expansion in space of the being which however looses its inner connections till it explodes, and finally social evolution requires first a clone reproduction to form with those equal parts a whole.

5 Entropic extinctions; of the pixels we absorb and ‘stop’ to perceive them as ‘corpses’ of a mapping; of the ‘fuel’ we need to move; of the ¡-2 elements we break down to reproduce our variety of forms, and viceversa, as death is a dual destruction down to scales of the fifth dimension ¡º<<¡-2; while social evolution of the whole destroys the freedom of its parts…

5 Social evolutions. Finally a mapping of information is the social evolution of the pixel stopped in the mind, a locomotion is a series of adjacent reproductive memorial tails of the being fading fast away in lineal fashion, a reproduction requires a palingenetic clone evolution of parts into wholes back and forth from the ∆-1 plane, while entropy is the inverse of social evolution, and twice the social evolution of a beings is its emergence as a super organism, a humind that becomes a prophet cloned in the mind of believers to emerge as a social whole, a star that evolves into a black hole mind of the galaxy and so on…

A better way to cast the connection between the 5th Ðimotion and reality though is to establish 5 clear forms of social organization, combination of the previous 4 elements with the element of social evolution: a language, which is the social representation of the whole by the 1st Ðimotion of the mind;  a  herd, which has its main purpose as a wave of the 2nd Ðimotion of locomotion; an ecosystem in which the 4th Ðimotion of entropic darwinian processes take place, an organism, whichis the evolution of the 3rd reproductive Ðimotion and a super organism, which is an organism of organisms, the 5th natural form that ‘tops’ all the possible states and processes of existence, coming therefore the conclusion that with the concept of a supœrganism all other concepts Ðimotions and its combinations can be cast.

The entanglement of all those layers of reality is so profound it cannot be cast on the usual systems of thought of the humind, so we are becoming creative with the language: 5 e-motions correspond to the pentagonal logic of sensations of the mind; and are the basis of a psychological stience. 5 loco-motions correspond to the 2nd Ðimotion studied by physics.  5 iterations correspond to the 3rd Ðimotion of reproduction; 5 extinctions to the modes of entropy, and 5 evolutions to the 5 forms of social organization.

We can then create a ¬Æ topological stience of the ‘variations’ of composite dimotions similar to the topological stience of varieties of complex manifolds, which is of great use and we shall apply extensively in the 3rd and fourth line to the understanding of the different variations of species – which in fact is a process of combinations of ternary simplex topologies in different hierarchical orders.

Of the 5 Ðimotions the less accepted by the egocy paradox is the most important – the will of the mind and its program of existence carried by its 5 e-motions, likely associated closed to the sensation of the 5 locomotions with the mind uses to perceive existence.

We shall deal with those processes though in this post with a composite approach that will put in relationship the behavior produced by those e-motions and the geometry and outcome of relationships, both destructive and constructive according to topology.

So indeed the Universe is a pentagonal kaleidoscopic fractal self-repetitive interactive entangled ilogic existential form of a higher logic than that of man.

All this allow us to study in simultaneous entangled view any system as a pentagonal island-universe.

The enhanced scientific method: ¬A(bcd)E

Stiences study the different scales of 5D metric as separated ‘disciplines’ when in fact all of them extract its properties and laws of the Disomorphic qualities of those 5D space≈time dimensions, among which the ternary structure of all systems reflected in the fractal generator: $pe lineal limbs/potentials < ∑∏: energy body waves > §ð: cyclical particles-heads, is the most important, which physics reflects in its conservation of those 3 elements as lineal momentum, energy and angular momentum.

So how in More detail the 5Dimotions of the Universe enhance and reconnect man to the entangled Universe? Expanding our knowledge of any event and form, reducing the chaos, projecting better our understanding of the blocks of time that shape the future as each super organism has a set path of existence (albeit, it can manipulate the speed of its dimotions and even for truly experts in the art of exist¡ences halt by repetition the process of aging, themes those of certain finesse studied in other posts). In brief, we MUST ad NEW elements to the scientific method and as usual given the growth of complexity required we try at least to use a mnemonic pentadimensional rule to it, what I have called ¬Æxistential Algebra, or ¬A(bcd)E stientific method:
We shall as usual cast its structure from the perspective of the enhanced ‘ABCDE‘ Principles of the Scientific method, which ads the properties of scalar space and cyclical time (Ðisomorphisms), the B-iological, organic models derived of it, and the Non-AE structure that results of the multiple nature of time-space dimotions to the classic elements:
 A-ccurate Data, C-orrespondence Principle with proved models and E-xperimental method that allows to hypothesize and predict the future of the species studied.

To make things ‘simpler’ the 3 ad-ons to ‘Data-Correspondence-Experimental method’ caused by cyclical time and fractal space, which are non-Æ: i-logic geometry, organic, Biological models and Disomorphisms, are wraped up in the Disomorphic method (a dynamic analysis of the system as it is generated by a seed of information, emerges as a super organism and lives a world cycle) or a shorter version – the analysis of the system through its 5 CAUSAL DIMENSIONS-ACTIONS-MOTION, or  ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple truths.

The reader of course has a mind schooled in the single causality of lineal Aristotelian time, A->B and the shallow geometry of Euclidean lineal dimensions. So for him it might seem unneeded to fully search for 5 Dimotions-actions-points of view in the analysis of any event to discover the minimal causality of its existence, but that is precisely the huge handicap of huminds doing science – little-big egos jumping up ‘me, I an myself has the only answer.
Not so: to explain anything in the entangled Universe you need the confluence of at least 3 ‘topological elements/timespace forms  in a single plane of existence, 3±¡ planes that influence the event from above and below and the whole, and if we were to fully grasp the event, its past-present and future states as a block of time.
So then, there wouldn’t be the absurd clash of egos between scholars each one studying a ceteris paribus cause of the polidimensional Universe and saying this IS the only cause.
If I only could erase that ceteris paribus plague of egocy (ego+idiocy) proper of the humind and teach the multiplicity of perspectives, it might be possible to expand your understanding and belonginess to the Universe and the World with which you are connected.
So for each article, we must consider AT LEAST the perspectives of those ∆±i scales and the 3 topologies of the ‘central plane’, ∆ø, where the event happens as a whole. This bare minimum (as the full blown understanding requires all the information of the past-preent-future world cycle block of time of the entity or event), implies to consider reality from the point of view of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe; as the entangled Universe always requires to understand reality from those 5 relative Topological Dimensions with motion=Dimotions=Actions of space & time to fully account for the simultaneous, multiple perspectives of reality.
So the ‘original’ two steps of the scientific method get more complex.
The first step – collection of accurate data now should include all those ‘subtle’ flows of information and energy that come into the event – for example in Physics flows coming from other scales as in the Kondo Effect; in our daily life, the burdens imposed by the ∆+1 state or world in which we exist.
Then when modeling- to find a causal explanation for an event – we cannot do ceteris paribus, or rather we should at least do 5Dimotional analysis of the 5 converging ‘elements’ of the being, NEVER existing as an isolate.
Finally if we are establishing the most abstract level of modeling – that of T.œ, theoretical extraction of general laws from a given spacetime event/being, according to the disomorphic nature of reality – i.e. to find for example that limbs/potentials of entropy have lineal/flat topologies, as the fastest/shortest distance between 2 points, we shall search for experimental evidence, NOT only as in classic thought within the restricted species we study but in the 3 great sub disciplines of human thought, Physical, biological and socio-economic systems. So we shall indeed find forces to be flat electromagnetic perpendicular planes in physical systems; wings to be flat and triangular in biology, and flat and triangular in socio-economic planes; as they are all ultimately ‘topological forms’ that keep emerging in new planes of space.
So this ABCDE mnemonic rule will allow us to study with a much more complex view, far more exhaustive and explanative, and at the same time far more relative, the reality that surrounds it.
And finally when all this is ideally done (please don’t expect me to do it all by myself, at this age, alone… this blog, we shall not cease to repeat is my attempt before my many sickness send me packing into Nirvana of leaving a ‘trace’ in the sand of thought, for others to build better structured castles)… as an appendix, we try to write ALL OF IT, with the ‘warped’ package of non-Æ i-logic equations.
So we get the FULL ¬A(bcd)Extraction of all the knowledge huminds can get of the being, which of course will NOT be all, as only the being has all the information into its self.
In terms of language it means as each of those dimotions is better studied with a certain language of the humind that we need to ad to the mathematical languages, verbal, logic languages, and bio-logical, organic ones; and finally metaphysical sentient/sensation-related concepts, which of course, the ceteris paribus egocy of scholars will shun off. Each humind has its own egocy perspective and we deal with that in our analysis of the equation of the mind, an infinitesimal mirror of still forms that believe to be infinite.
So that is the future of stience, in any planet in which similar huminds have kept expanding our connection with the entangled Universe.
In this first line though we just consider a brief introduction to the more complex formal elements of the model, which will grow in intensity and complexity through the lines of the web.

Unfortunately it is required, specially to make the whole T.œ match the equations of mathematical physics known for its exactitude. I.e. the main formula of physics are ALL expressions of those space-time demotions and its constants, ‘STeps’ of spacetime demotions, but which dimotion, what rules exist to combine each of the five dimotions  and how they apply to every scale and phenomena of physics, is needed – the devil is in the details – to fully grasp those equations, graphed in the picture…

Indeed, once we understand the laws of T.œs, there is work for many generations to rewrite with the simplicity of the first principles of the Universe the entire cosmic landscape from the smallest to the largest form. As I failed in my youth when a student at Columbia U. to interest academia into the task of writing an encyclopedia of the 5D Universe, I had for 30 years to do the work in and out of my life and random jobs. So the reader should excuse that as so many pioneers, from Mr. Aristotle teaching that blockhead of Alexander, to Leonardo doubling as weapon master and painter, to Leibniz working for that blockhead of Prince William, the work is by force incomplete and disordered, abandoned and retaken, rewritten and lost so many times… all what I can do at this stage is to leave a trace in this blog, trying to maximize the coherence of its parts.

DISOMORPHIC LAWS.

‘ I would like to know the thoughts of God the rest are details’ Einstein

A more important element of the 5th dimension regarding epistemology is the concept and/or existence of a program for all systems that merely repeat the ±∆exi,st åctions of exchange of energy and information in social groups that ensure their survival and reproduction beyond its finite duration.

We explore this element, which would have enormous implications in the metaphysical aspects of epistemology in depth in the 3rd line.

DEFINITIONS. Worldcycles in time, super organisms in space, scales of infinity.

Symbols of Existential Algebra used to describe the 9+i isomorphisms, social scales and ∆-planes of reality:

Paraphrasing Einstein, i-logic geometry (space p.o.v.) = existential algebra (time p.o.v.) – give us both, the Thoughts of The Creator – the Generator Equation and ‘Its’ details – every part and event of the Universe, whose laws derive from such ‘Thoughts’:

The 3Arrows/Dimensions of Time: <, >, =.

<: Itis the explosive big-bang, death-entropy arrow that defines the creation of spatial energy: O<Sp or past arrow.

>:  It is the implosive temporal life-order arrow that defines the creation of information: Sp>O.

=, <=>: Is the arrow of present, simultaneous exchange of energy and information between 2 poles: Sp<=>O.

In Universal Grammar is the arrow of self-similarity.

The 3 Topologies of Space are represented by letters or ‘geometric symbols’ (O=Es; O=Tƒ: <=>, Ø =Sp X Tƒ):

– Spe or |: It is the membrane, energetic part, male pole, 3D spherical topology  (in 2, 1D, the plane or line)

-Tƒi, O: It’s the zero point, informative part, brain, female pole, 3D hyperbolic topology (in 2, 1D, the vortex, cycle)

Where we encoded the oppositions between S=pace-entropy vs. Time in-form, Past vs. future

-<=>,Ø, Sp X Tƒ: It is the body, reproductive part, ‘son’, 3D toroid topology, (in 2D, the cone).

The 4 Existential åctions: ∆ï, ∆E, ï,œ û; ∑ , ∏: They, and their combinations, define the program of existence.

 ∆ï is the action of information gauging.It is the 1st Postulate of i-logic, the 1D of information – rotation, cycle.

– ∆Sp is the action of Energy feeding. It is the 2nd Postulate & the 1st Dimension of Energy – length, motion.

 ST=Sp X Tƒ is the action of Bonding that creates complementary systems related to the 3rd Postulate.

– <=> is the action of communication; mostly between 2 points, Sp<=>Tƒ & defines the 2nd Dimension: the wave.

– ∑, ∑û is the action of social evolution, either reproduction ∑Sp X Tƒ, or Herding: ∑ Ei, creating a 3D, width-plane. And its variety:

∏, ±∆ is the action of network creation of superorganisms across 3 existential planes: ∆-1 cellular, ∆-organic & ∆+1 social plane through an informative language. It obeys a power law, as T cycles will create Tƒaxons. Thus: ∏T>Tƒ

Those symbols define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the invariances in space (topological invariances) and Time (causal chains, sequential ages), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<=>∏Tƒ.

Such as the Universe allows any combination forwards (>) and backwards (<) or without motion=change (=) in time; any topological combination or transformation between Sp, Tƒ,<=>; any sequential sum of åctions (∆ï, ∆Sp, Sp<ST>Tƒ; ∑, ∏ ±∆ ) and any ∆±2 jump and/or transfer of energy and/or information between planes of existence (as systems co-exist in 3 scales) but nothing else.

And as we explore in the mathematical posts, the most experimental of all ‘stienœs’, those rules we will indeed SEE once and again how the ternary principle holds. i.e.: there are only three topological varieties in a single three dimensional space, there are overwhelmingly only three degrees of differential equations with use in science; as three is the number of scales, topologies of space-time, which the mind-will perceives and enacts, beyond which ‘reality becomes undistinguishable’.

And of all those possible partial games the most perfect of them all is the one of super organisms, which hence is the immortal game: fractal point minds that construct herds that evolve as they gather density into a social super organism efficiently defined by its networks (third line of the blog explaining this game from the mind pov, first line from an objective external view).

Let us consider this huge overhauling of our languages of thought…

 

The simplest generator equation.

 Let us consider then with the simplest possible symbols of Non-Æ Logic (the advanced formalism needed to describe the more complex space and time), a logic equation of the ternary space-time topological forms=functions of all ‘organisms’ of the Universe:

≥: iterative, reproductive, hyperbolic networks that become body waves, as the hyperbola has all the shapes within it to reproduce the whole being.

| ≈: Flat planes of lineal parallel networks of ‘fractal points’ that become  limbs/fields of maximal entropic motions as the line/plane is the fastest distance between two points.

O: Informative, implosive ‘neuronal networks that become cyclical spherical particles-heads that process information as the sphere stores maximal information in minimal space.

So the simultaneous ensemble of ‘networks of cellular/atomic/organic herds’ into those 3 differentiated functions=forms which therefore extends across to ∆ø and ∆-1 scales, within the ∆+1 world in which the ternary network/system exists is what we call a super organism.

So we write with those symbols fa Generator Equation of T.œs.

$t: (limbs/fields of motion and Universe) ≤iterative body-wave≥ §ð  (still mind form or world)

The ginormous quantity of consequences, detailed and laws derived from that simple formula being made of those 3 topologies would fill up when study in its details – all the beings and super organisms of reality and its ternary parts – an entire galactic encyclopedia.

So in this very brief introduction we shall consider  onlythe most remarkable consequence in the simplest level of understanding of it – the ternary principles of conservation of physics that correspond to the 3 parts of all systems.

Each of those vital topologies would require an entire post and encyclopedia to fully analyze the marriage of mathematics and organic existence.

Let us now consider the most important of them, the cyclic/spheric form. Its vital function is to process in-form-ation, memorial form. And so it is cyclic, spherical for two reasons: A sphere has maximal volume in minimal space, ensuring the ‘still, informative’ system to process maximal information and disguise with minimal exposure. But most important memorial in-form-ation is cyclical because TO RETURN TO A POINT, THE SHORTEST PATH IS A CYCLE.

So cycles impose their form in all kind of Universal structures which ‘conserve’, ‘memorize’ and reproduce the information of its external world and the information of its internal existence (as in the conserved cycles of energy).

The full formalism of a Theory of the Organic Everything or whole and its Time§pace Œrganisms (T.œ), its fractal parts, should be made departing from a description of its 5 Ðimotions in simultaneous space that describes the system as a super organism, in 3 fractal ∆±¡ planes, in a static, ‘structural space-like form’ through ¬Æ: Existential algebra and in a ‘time-like dynamic flow as it is generated by a singularity  mind-seed of information which will grow, evolve into 3 networks, emerge as a whole, trace its worldcycles between birth and extinction in the external world through actions of exchange of energy and information, aging till a point in which all its energy will be exhausted and it will collapse, in an entropic explosion of death.

We call the analysis of its 5 Dimotions in abstract as adjacent topologies of a super organism or in vital terms as ‘actions’; the Rashomon effect, since we study as in the famous film 5 different points of view or elements through which the being expresses itself. And we call the study of its world cycle through the entire life-death existence of the being the Disomorphic method as we study the defining elements of the whole process of life, from its palingenetic generation of a seed that will become a ‘mind’ of a territory of external world and internal ternary physiological control of its ‘brother cells/atoms/citizens’, to fully create a super organism that will live and die again through those 5 Dimotions.

Those 2 approaches together, the space-like and the time-like define the super organism and its worldcycle in a far more complex and rich manner than the previous 4D formalism of Mr. Einstein did with its single analysis of only one time arrow, the worldline or locomotion; which from this far richer and meaningful analysis of Times seems rather a childish exercise compared to our full blown complex extraction of all the information about a being and its worldcycle of existence.

 

5 DIMOTIONS AS FRACTAL @ctions

The 5 Dimotions of timespace are actions in its vital, organic content, motions whose biotopology correspond to the 5 drives of life of the singularity-minds, self-centers of those actions.

We express its 5 forms & functions performed by all space-time entities with a simple mnemonic rule – 5 vowels, slightly changed as usual in the building of a proper jargon for philosophy of ∃xist¡ence:

-å-ccelerations for locomotions, as it is the first perceived action, but requires previously an ∆º mind to take the will-decision of moving, normally towards an

∃-ntropic field in which to feed and absorb energy. It is the most existential action, hence the use of the inverted e-letter symbol IN LOGIC of existence.

ï-nformation gauging, as information is a dual action, of absorption of information but also communication of information, inner and outer duality with the purpose of:

œ-ffspring reproduction of a new supœrganism clone of the seeding father, hence the use of the symbol for super organisms, œ.

Which then will engage in a process of social evolution into a û-niversal whole that will emerge as a full being; and again in the world at large will participate in its ecosystem of different social ∆§cales of beings. Hence the ˆ symbol for emergence into an upper social scale.

So the 5 actions/vowels, would be: å,∃,ï,œ,û.

In praxis though as we don’t care that much for the form or content of this blog, which huminds don’t seem to have much interest in reading, we shall use the faster-writing aeiou. In the next graph an old montage of the different aeious of several scales of reality:

5 ACTIONS

The mind’s  5 ±∆ e, ï, œ, û fractal space-time åctions of all beings that move, feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially from the simplest particles to the highest systems; whose integral creates in space a super organism in time a world cycle. 

Every being of the Universe responds to the same actions because it is made of the same substances. It is a perennial philosophical reflection that if one looks deeply enough into oneself, one will discover not only one’s own essence, but also the essence of the universe. For as one is a part of the universe as it is everything else, the basic energies and forms of the universe flow through oneself, as they flow through everything else. For that reason it is thought that one can come into contact with the nature of the universe if one comes into substantial contact with one’s ultimate inner being. This ultimate inner being is the desire of the mind, the will to live, exist and experience the actions and ‘co-existing’ sensations related to them.

The flow of timespaces advances through the actions of its systems, which constantly exchange energy and informations.

We have resumed those actions in 5 subgroups, and named them with the simple vowels of the alphabet of existence:

locomotions (åccelerations) ∃ntropic actions of energy feeding, ïnformative ones of perception and communication, reproductive (œffspring creation) and final the social evolution of individuals into Universals – new emerging super organisms appearing in a higher ∆+1 plane of existence.

Those actions are the ‘knots and bolts’ of reality, the manifest ‘expressed’  existence of beings, its program of survival.

And so as a whole package they are deterministic among all beings that survive, and yet they are probabilistic in as much as the being is ‘free’ to choose between them; and they are NOT a free choice into what regards its outcome – as it depends on the interaction with the outer world in which they happen.

Its specific form is also not free as it is determined by the ‘constitution’ of the being, once it emerges as a whole T.œ:

Actions are allowed combinations of the pertinent entropy, energy and information, which beings constantly absorb and emit with limbs, bodywaves and particle/heads as they exist, trying to maximize their total actions, combinations of energy and information, expression of its ‘vitality’, the stuff of which exist¡ence is made.

As they are both sequential-causal: ï>å>∃>œ>û; and hierarchical û<œ<∃<å<ï in exactly the inverse fashion; that is the being ( if we apply the homolog method: what humans experience must be the program of all other time space beings) has the exact inverse wish to that of its sequential order of actions, the program of actions, of exist¡ence is quite determined.

Since the order to reach universal social evolution, the highest goal, requires first the reproduction of an offspring of clones, which requires to feed on the energy of others, which requires its entropic killing, which requires a motion to perpendicularly intercept the being, which requires its perception… and yet we are driven to perform those actions because we want the higher goal of complex actions of reproduction and social evolution into powerful wholes, the program of exist¡ence in the Universe reaches an extraordinary order.

In the graph, human beings in its ‘entropic’ dissolution age as a supœrganism of history, dominated by the emerging super organism of machines and its company-mothers and Metal-earth, global digital planet that substitute our wor(l)d, have completely forgotten the real, organic fractal 5D Universal pyramid of drives of existence, toppled by social communication, which in its maximal form – eusocial love, structures the scales of the fractal, organic Universe; and reduced to the simplest actions of each individual means, its desire to be part of the whole, to love IS THE COMPLEX higher action our capitalist ideology that worships machines above man and surrogates our exist¡ence as ‘enzymen’ of those company-mothers in which we evolve and reproduce its organisms make us become disordered in a dog-eat-dog society when behaving as humans, but the primitive capitalist culture in which we live has nothing to do with ‘reality’ as it should be in a perfect human world. Since the Universe has a clear goal: social love, evolution into wholes.

So the negation of the hierarchical order of actions and the desire to exist is very rare, proper of the last entropic age of existence, or a conscious decision of the mind that performs them for philosophical reasons (Buddhism, denial of exist¡ence) or a difficult ‘Buridan choice’,  as when we don’t want to act and say ‘i dont have energy and time to do this’.

Actions, we know naturally is what we are made of, combining energy and information, exi, in space-time fields, ST¡, where we act to exi=st¡

Duality of actions-reactions

As we said we try to maximize our actions, which in praxis means to eat ad maximal, run the most, fuk every other day, and have fun with friends, not to speak of becoming overdrive of tv-trash information?! That shows you actions must be ordered and are regulated indeed by the limits of being just another virtual T.œ in pursuit of vital actions as everything else from the smaller particle to the whole galaxy in its hyper universe.

So in praxis actions are balanced, for the being to last and not burst out of exist¡ence for excessive action and imbalance. This means the very same actions we perform have ± dualities: actions cause external reactions of opposite sign, in the generalization of Newton’s second law and also in the internal balance of the organism, which for each positive outward action has a negative inward one.

The function of existence thus resumes in the number of actions a being performs with its energy and information which are basically:

±∆e: feeding (+) and moving (-) that spends the. energy obtained entropically in the action of feeding.

±∆ï: informing (+) and communicating (-). So we hear and talk, we see and draw…

±∆exi: reproducing (+) and killing (-), as we need the energy obtained entropically to reproduce ourselves.

±∑exi: Evolving socially (+) or dissolving≈dying (-)…

Thus it turns out that the function of existence of beings, made of a sum of actions, which can logically be put sequentially (as ∑exi needs first, ∆exi, which needs first, ∆e and ∆i) creates a natural evolution of a being through simple logic equations of motions in time and space where:

> is an implosion of space into time, of energy into information, S>T and vice versa: T<S is an entropic flow of disorder.

Tƒ Exi≈ST∆U±4 : S-Topologies, Informative Time Cycles & Scalar Actions, the 3 ‘elements’ of existence.

All this said it is quite easy to understand the Function of Existence, in its simplest meaningful version, a ternary understanding of its components, forms in space, cycles in time and cyclical åctions in space-time.

If we depart from a ‘fractal point’. The Worldcycle of that fractal world, ω≈∑∂æ,e,ï,œ,û, will be the sum of all its åctions of motion, ∂a, energy feeding, ∂e, informative perception, ∂I, offspring reproduction, ∂o, and universal creation, ∂u:

 ± E: A-CCELERATE, ENERGY FEED

±ï: PERCEIVE AND COMMUNICATE INFORMATION

±∆… Œ: REPRŒDUCE;∫U: EVOLVE SOCIALLY

Diffeomorphic systems. The translation of form into motion. The isomorphism of åctions in the Universe.

Galileo’s Paradox makes the 3 dimensions of space also motions: At quantum scale ‘space’ is a bubbling world of electromagnetic energies and particles condensed from those energies. In our scale, space is a gas whose volume is proportional to its motion/temperature: PxV=knT. And as its motion grows volume-space grows.

Physicists, unaware of the paradox of Galileo still draw higher dimensions as weird spatial drawings, when beyond 3D, dimensions are time motions of a higher fractal scale. Yet they wrongly try to spatialize those time dimensions of higher fractal 5D scales, making them still and placing them in the same space-time sheet, with  impossible drawings of dimensions beyond the 3rd one of ‘volume’, which of course lack any functional purpose.

Yet Dimensions are functional motions perceived in stillness, which explains the generation of dimensions:

A point with motion creates first a height dimension to ‘gauge’ from an advantageous P.O.V.; then it moves forward in its diffeomorphic dimension of energy feeding, creating a plane; a line in motion creates a bidimensional plane of information; a plane in motion, reproduces laterally, creating a mass-volume and a volume in motion creates a life-cycle or world-cone – the concept used in Relativity to define the 4th dimension of time. But we cannot generate more dimensions in this fashion, except as mathematical entelechies, at least in our observed Universe, since they are neither such forms nor further functions in a single continuous space-time plane. Thus the 5th dimension of scales, with different time speeds structures superorganisms.

It is the holographic principle: 3D space has 2 dimensions of temporal information, height and width (so a book or a screen has those 2 dimensions that you ‘read’) and 2 dimensions of energy, length and width, as we absorb energy in the direction of motion, reproducing and storing cells in the ‘fat’ dimension of width that merges both, Sp X Tƒ dimensions of space-time.

Thus both, energy ‘sheets’ and ‘informative antennae’ are bidimensional, perceived by human senses as a duality of motion-stillness (Galileo’s Paradox). So the 1st dimension is length or speed; the 2D are a moving plane or sheet of information as this page is; the 3rd is a volume or rotating body, which moves through the 4th dimension, treated as space in Relativity (a world line). Finally, an organism in 5D seems ‘still’ but within it all cells and particles are performing complex cycles of energy and form.

Moreover we observe that as each more complex action includes the previous ones, each ‘bigger dimension’ includes the previous ones. So the line includes the point; the plane, the line; the volume the plane and the world-cone the plane. Thus we write in dynamic terms the Generator, as a feedback equation of fluxes of energy and information between 2 poles, ∑Sp∆-1<=>∏ ∆, that create 5 Diffeomorphic, fractal, Space-Time Dimensions.

dtp_2269905_USER_CONTENT_1_html_m207db326

In the graph, the diffeomorphic Principle of Einstein’s 4D analysis acquires an organic nature, when we see the Universe as the sum of ∞ Complementary exi systems whose dimensions have organic functions: Systems feed on their relative dimension of energy-length, perceive in their relative dimension of height and reproduce in their relative combined dimension of width, which are assembled into each specific species. In the graph, an animal has its informative height in its high perceptive light dimension, but a plant, which uses light as energy has its up and down dimensions inverted respect to the man and its chemical brain buried on the Earth. So both have opposite energy-time coordinates.

Yet both have an ‘anteroposterior’, lineal’ ‘outward’ energy oriented structure. While a galaxy has a cyclical, informative, inward structure, as the stars’ body absorbs energy from intergalactic space, reproduces matter with it and feeds the internal informative knot of gravitation, with a higher height dimension the black hole.

 Thus there is a correspondence between the inner physiological networks of a being that perform SP X TƑ åctions and its external diffeomorphic dimensions. So a dimensional form is also motion with a function. Even in a human being the height dimension is really the nervous-brain system network, his length motion, the natural path of his energy limbs, and his width is maximal in the digestive system that reproduces new cells.

Forms respond always to functions/åctions in time, the commanding ‘element’ to which the form of any being adapts diffeomorphically to maximize its existential åctions. Thus, there is a parallelism between ‘vital function’ and ‘abstract dimension’ as each Dimension is diffeomorphic created by the vital space-time of each entity of the Universe performing its exi åctions. And each species is a ‘fractal universe in itself’, with different relative, energetic and informative directions that determine its own up & down arrows and complementary morphology,

The specific geometry of each species and its 3 simplex åctions, energy feeding=length, information-gauging =height and reproduction=width fluctuate in shape, but they don’t vary in topological form, giving birth to the Invariance of the 3 topological forms=functions of any entity observed in a single 3D space-time: Toroid informative heads, hyperbolic reproductive bodies and energetic limbs studied in the next paragraph.

While the 2 social ±∆ fractal dimensions, the 4th dimension of social motion in a social ∆+1 herd and the 5D dimension of inner scales within the being follow the physiological invariances that create super-organisms co-existing in a higher ∆+1 ecosystem with a lower ∆-1 internal, cellular space (B3). In the next graph we resume the

5 diffeomorphic dimensions=åctions create a Generator Equation any being maximizes: Max. ∑Sp x ∏Tƒ.

It describes the 3±∆ åctions all systems perform: gauging information, Tƒ, feeding on energy, ∑Sp, reproducing both, x, and evolving socially as parts of bigger scales.

So 4 parameters suffice to describe all systems in terms of its åctions:

But mechanist science ignores the 3 topological ages of space-time organisms and its social, scalar evolutions between its informative births and entropic deaths, because it fails to understand the organic whys its mathematical equations describe. As scientific equations are mere varieties of the Fractal Generator and its 4 functions. They represent the 4 vital åctions common to all species of space-time. Thus in each of those scientific scales 4 functional equations express the energetic, informative, reproductive and social åctions that suffice to describe the existence of each species.

4 Vital Dimensions explain the existence of light-space: the wide, energetic, magnetic field; the tall, informative, electric field; the reproductive, long wave speed, calculated as the product of its electric and magnetic field and its frequency colors, which are societies of photons.

4 Maxwell equations describe all the åctions of an electric field. 4 quantum numbers describe all the åctions of particles: the first number explains its energy level; the second number, its feeding & perceptive gauging; the 3rd spin number shows its chances of reproducing new particles with a particle of opposite sexual spin; the 4th magnetic number shows the social distribution of its atomic organism. 4 type of vibrations organize a social molecule. 4 nucleotide acids code the vital åctions of the cell. And 4 drives of existence -feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially- explain the game of life, which now mankind finally understands, just before she ends her existence.

So be humble, you are nothing, just a 10 dimensional being, an infinitesimal soul who looked at the infinite Universe, a variety of the 4 symbols of the fractal generator, who denied the meaning of existence confused itself with the whole, and now will die dust of space-time.

Since only the Universe, and its soul, the fractal generator of infinite existences is eternal. @… monads are minds composed of a max. still form or linguistic singularity and a cyclical time membrane, connected through invaginations. It is the ‘invisible’ central command of the being, which perceives the Universe’s timespace cycles and stop its motion through a mirror image in the ‘languages’ of ‘the mind’, which then reflect its back ordering reality as it converts its motions into ‘@ctions’…

So we study the form of the monad in space as a linguistic mirror.

 

THE EXISTENTIAL FUNCTION AND ITS GENERATOR EQUATION

We call this full understanding of both internal and external space time, the function of all existences of space-time, Œ.

The function of existence studies both, internal and external space-time together, analyzing the interrelationships between internal and external time, which define the åctions of beings, as they exchange its momentum, its energy and information with the external world.

In that regard, the relationships between the 4 fundamental elements of that equation, internal space or ‘energy’ and internal time cycles or ‘information’ (two concepts which are somewhat wider than the restricted equations of physics) and external space and time or ‘duration’, give birth to 5 fundamental type of ‘åctions’ in space-time:

– ‘External motions’, with its accelerations, decelerations and changes of speed (∂a); absorption and storage of energy for those motions (∂e), absorption of information to gauge, perceive and direct those motions (∂i), reproduction of the cycles and organs of energy and information of the being in a parallel offspring (∂o), and finally the social evolution of individual, fractal space-times into ‘Universal’, larger social planes (∂u).

And so those 5 vowels, or åctions of space-time, ∂(æ,e,ï,œ,û), which all existential functions perform through their finite life-death cycle is the next step of analysis of the function of existences, as those 5 åctions are common to all systems of the Universe, even if science describes them with different jargons and equations. For example, in quantum physics, they are analyzed with the 4 quantum numbers, which code the motion of the particle (1st number), its absorption and emission of particles of energy and information (2nd number), its processes of decoupling≈ reproduction (spin number) and its processes of social evolution organized by its magnetic number.

While in biology the 4-5 nucleotide letters of DNA seem increasingly as we learn more of the genome of biological beings to be specialized in the coding of such functions. In organisms, biologists call those 5 åctions the drives of life, and define life as systems, which absorb energy, perceive information, move, reproduce and evolve socially into complex molecular and multicellular systems.

What the function of existences does, therefore is to widen the concept of ‘life drives’, through the mathematical analysis of the ‘åctions’ in space-time of all systems, to physical sciences. It describes therefore a pantheist Universe, which only the anthropomorphism of Humans fails to accept. So when particles gauge information and use it to move towards fields of energy, where they absorb that energy to decouple into new particles, with whom they will aggregate into social groups, we dare not to say particles are performing their life drives, as when organisms perceive information and use it to move towards energy preys, which they absorb as energy to reproduce into new organisms, which will aggregate into social herds. But beyond the use of different words, they are doing exactly the same.

And it is the function of existences, of internal and external space-time, what explains why they are doing the same.

Moreover, when we order those cyclical åctions across the finite time duration, the finite existence of a being between birth and extinction, the frequency of the åctions shows a clear pattern, an order common to all systems of the Universe, which in a first ‘young age’, perform more simpler åctions of motion and energy feeding (∂ a,e), in its adult age, perform more åctions of reproduction, (∂œ), and in the old age, it performs more åctions of information and social evolution from parts into Universal wholes (∂ï, û).

And so we can divide the T-duration of a being perceived externally between birth and death as a single timeline into multiple åctions, multiple time cycles, grouped roughly in 3 main ages, a young, energetic age of maximal motion: Max.Sp, an old age of maximal information, Max. Tƒ, and an intermediate adult age, in which Sp and Tƒ combine in balance to reproduce the being, S≈T:

Max. Sp> Sp≈ I > Max. Tƒ

We call this ‘development’ of the function of existences in 3 ages for each life-death cycle the ‘Worldcycle’ equation of a being. Again we prefer to use a more ‘physical, philosophical’ term than the life-death cycle, to avoid the usual anthropomorphic reserves humans have to any pantheist theory that make us not different from other beings. So if physicists call the entire sum of motions of a being in spacetime a worldline (using lineal time), as we use cyclical time, we call the entire duration of a being, and its åctions of spacetime, its worldcycle.

And as we shall see all ‘spacetime cycles do have those 3 ‘ages, horizons or dimension of time’. For example, motions do have a first age of acceleration and impulse, a steady state age of speed, and a final deceleration till the motion stops. And they are obviously equivalent to the first age (Max. Sp≈ acceleration), the balanced age (steady speed, S≈T) and the 3rd age of maximal form and minimal motion, as the system stops.

In mathematical terms, we can consider the worldcycle the ‘derivative’ in time of the function of existence, Œ, ∂Œ/∂Tƒ.

And the topological structure in space, made of 3 varieties of 2-manifolds that create all beings, the derivative in space of the function of existence, ∂œ/∂Sp

But only, if we consider the system all together, analyzing all the vital cycles and vital spaces, organizing them, extracting their laws, we will reach a higher, deeper, more harmonic understanding of it all and all its fractal parts.

373b

The Generator of Fractal, bidimensional Space-time Worldcycles, SexTƒ=∑RU±4, can be ceteris paribus analyzed in its 3 fundamental components:

Sp: Its 2-manifold organic parts that create a diffeomorphic being in space.

Tƒ: Its worldcycle that makes the being live and die using those 3 parts to enact.

∑RU±4: Its cyclical ‘åctions’ which make him absorb and emit ‘—motions’ and information, Sp x Tƒ, in motions, ∇Sp, feeding åctions, ∆Sp,  ∆ï perceptions, reproductive åctions, ∇O, and Social and Darwinian events, ∇∆U with the different planes of existence of the being.

This is the Program of Existence that all systems follow to survive, deduced from the structural elements of any fractal Superorganism of scalar space and cyclical time, which will try to maintain stable its ST-form and reproduce it beyond death in small ‘åctions’ and full ‘reproductions’ of the being, such as:

∑a=R, ∑e=S, ∑t=O. Reprod-åctions of a being across its ST±4 planes is the existential game we all play.

In the ambivalent symbolism of 5D, I used often the term i for information and instead of ∆-somorphic planes, U-space time planes.

Then we can write the Generator equation, Se x Tƒ = ∑ST, as  ∑ExI=ST,  this alternative ‘old expression’ of the Generator means that to “Exist’ is to absorb and emit entropy/energy and information in a series of åctions, ∑, which try to maintain a system in balance with its space-time environment. And all this is managed by the relative zero-point, Tƒ, of the system:

Tƒ Exi=st is therefore a tautological word. The rules of existence are in that sense common to all beings. What will vary is the specific form in which a certain particle, head or informative center, Tƒ, manage to survive by its åctions. Or fail. 

There are 3 natural – 3 always 3 – ways to perceive the scales of the 5th dimension in relationship with any of us, beings.

– H(w) or ∑. Through its entire existence, and that is the worldcycle of the being, whose ages we explained in our posts on time cycles; there is the level of the I in a given point of its external, absolute space-time world. This is the Worldcycle Function of the being

– G(œ). Then we can make a slice of the worldcycle and see that relative non-Euclidean point=being in that moment of space-time, and study its vital space and cyclical time functions, its body/wave and particle/head in that moment, structurally in its forms and functions. And this is the function of existence of the being G(œ) or Œ

– F(a). Finally we can take not the being but the external cyclical action of the being in the Universe in a moment of space-time. Since really this is what the Universe is truly about: beings existing in a given U∆±∆ , Universal Plane sandwiched between other Universal Planes of Different U-scale, which exist inside of it. Whereas the being, develop survival åctions, as its internal space-time exchanges energy and information with those Universal Panes. And each of those ‘forceful åctions’ become an external motion which influences the external world with more or less depth or consequence. And so the last level of understanding of reality is that of the analysis of its minute åctions (themselves decomposed finally into forces and its co-related elements).

And so we considered in the previous posts on the åctions of the Universe, a general equation that encompasses the 3 other:

U = ∑ H (w) = ∫œ dt = ∫ F (æ,e,ï,œ,û) dst±4 = 0

But we can also consider from a more philosophical, continuous way, the whole system and its worldcycle, precisely not so much from the two extreme of the worldcycle and its åctions (which considers the existential being as a non-entity, the ego as a programmed non-aware of the program point playing to maximize tis function of existence (åctions) and at the same time to ‘cheat’ the final limits or zero points of birth and death where the function cancels its two opposite ‘±waves of inverted, energy-information åctions…

This rather mathematical way to express it all, requires still an integrative point of view, from the ∫Œ, being as a whole, his will and ‘fantasy’ of being an independent entity that chooses.

Choice indeed is part of the function of existence. We could say it is all what it does. To choose between the oaeiu, to talk the ‘language of åctions’ through life with the subconscious mechanic or vegetative apperceptive knowledge that he ‘is playing.

This is what we prefer to discuss in those posts where we write the function as Sp x I = ST±4.

The Generator of Fractal, bidimensional Space-time Worldcycles:

can then be written as an ideography of its components…

Tƒ∑ExI±st…

where Tƒ is the head-particle, the body that exchanges energy and information through its 3networks, ∑ExI, and the ±åctions that absorb energy and information from the external Universe.

Thus Existence is a program that tries to satisfy the needs of the mind and body through space-time åctions performed with the world-Universe that surrounds the system.

So as always there are in this view of the function of existence 3 fundamental components:

Tƒ: Its worldcycle that makes the being live and die using those 3 parts to enact.

∑ Sp x Tƒ: Its 2-manifold 3 organic parts that create a diffeomorphic being in space.

And the external field

∑ST±4: Its cyclical ‘åctions’ which make him absorb and emit entropy and information, Se x Tƒ, in motions, ∇Sp, feeding åctions, ∆Sp,  ∆ï perceptions, reproductive åctions, ∇O, and Social and Darwinian events, ∇∆U with the different planes of existence of the being.

Tƒ exist is therefore to perform the function of existence through åctions in the external world that exchange energy and information to reproduce and evolve socially the internal world that expands cellular and socially through the world cycle of the being.

The meaning of existence is a tautology in itself: we ‘exi=st’ to inform ourselves in order to absorb Energy – the capacity to move and order those motions into form with the aim of reproducing our organism in other zone of space-time, avoiding in this manner ‘extinction’, the inverse function of existence – since we are only ‘parts’ of the total Universe with a limited quantity of vital Entropy/space and a limited duration of time. So to ensure the survival of our in/form/ation we must either reproduce in other zones of space-time or increase our quantity of vital Entropy and our duration in time, by becoming a part of a bigger entity, a wave, herd or organism.

So our åctions become ‘bricks’, units, frequencies of those 4 main arrows of time. And while all ‘yin=information has a bit of yang=Entropy’ and vice versa, we can distinguish those åctions by the quantity of Entropy or information they deploy, within the limits of an action, whose total product is constant:

  • Tƒ x Min a: Informative action
  • Max Sp x Min Tƒ: Energetic action
  • S=T: Reproductive action
  • ∑ Sp x ∑Tƒ2: Social action

The sum of all those åctions is what all beings do as existential beings whatever type of existence, the entity carries on. All this can be formalized in a simple Mandate, which all the languages, equations and åctions of all particles, beings and entities of reality follow: maximize your time arrows, maximize your function of existence:

Max. ∑ Sp X Tƒ

Thus, if the Universe can be defined externally, objectively, as a geometry of two inverse motions, Entropy and information; from the internal perspective of the ‘will’ or ‘why’ of those motions of time, the Universe is a game of ‘exi=stence’, where ‘to grow=evolve and multiply’ is the meaning of it all.

Some scientists think that this mandate can only expressed in the language of particles and forces, machines and spatial forms, geometry=mathematics. But this is by no means truth. Indeed, all languages of all species, which each particle or entity of reality use to guide its behavior in the Universe express the mandate to its species.

As Pythagorism affirms, physical entities are mathematical entities in as much as they use the language of mathematics to gauge Entropy and information and maximize their exi=stence. This is self-evident. We can describe the åctions of physical particles only with mathematics because that is the language which they possess. Probably all particles are like small computers and vice versa. We are about to be able to make quantum computers using the simplest physical particles. But you need then the ‘errors’ of the Galilean=Ego paradox of Physicists – aka reductionism – not to go further than that, and affirm that the Universe is only mathematics, and that the mathematical åctions of particles that gauge constantly information and Entropy, have no will behind, no purpose, no goal.

This of course means that nothing else matter, nor Biology, nor life, nor Humanity and History, because when we enter into those other scales and entities, mathematics is not enough to describe the behavior of humans and living beings. Yet, with 3×3 time arrows and the mandate of existence, we can still explain all the åctions and forms of biology and history. So again, according to the Principle of Correspondence, we can consider that mathematics as the language of physical particles and physics, as the science that studies only those particles of information and its forces of Entropy, are part of a bigger Stience of Stiences, the science of Multiple Spaces-Times.

Consider indeed, Biological beings. They have a geometrical, topological form, which we briefly described in previous paragraphs and will analyze in more detail. Essentially, any biological being is a complementary being, made of networks of cells that try to maximize the simplex arrows of time: perception of information, with their heads; and absorption of Entropy with their body.

They also try to maximize their complex arrows of time, which are less common (yet still exist in physical particles): the arrow of reproduction and the arrow of social evolution that gathers cells into organisms.

Physical particles, quarks and electrons, also reproduce when they absorb a lot of Entropy and evolve in social networks, molecules, planets and stars; yet their dominant arrows are Entropy and information, the simplest ones, given their minimal ‘volume of existence’. And so Sp<=>Tƒ, the fundamental beat of reality will suffice to explain most physical åctions.

In Biology though, the dominant arrow is reproduction, Max. Sp X Tƒ; and so we shall understand finally the ultimate meaning of theory of Evolution encoded in Mr. Darwin’s dictum: A struggle for existence follows from the constant reproduction of species in an environment of limited resources.

The way this fight for existence between species takes place is what Darwin described. The Biological networks or organs of each species (nervous=informative system, digestive= energetic system and hormonal=blood, reproductive system) define its physiology, the key science of medicine and biology at the scale of organisms.

Yet, because entities of reality spread over several fractal scales of size, the language that living beings ‘speak’ to reproduce and create a self-similar entity is the genetic code. And so we have a new language, genetics, which encodes the function of existence of living beings, trying to maximize its reproduction, Entropy and information absorption and social evolution.

Finally, in the scale of human beings, the main language that expresses the function of existence is NOT mathematics, neither genetics, which encodes our biological life as individuals, since we are guided in the external, social world, by the arrow of social evolution and the memetic, cultural objects we use to organize societies. Thus, again the language has changed: humans encode their wantings and will for Entropy, information, social evolution and reproduction in verbal mandates, which are either philosophical, logical, religious or legal codes. So Genesis said ‘and God told man, grow and multiply’, which again means Max. Sp X Tƒ, reproduce, grow your Entropy and information.

And Jesus said ‘love each other as I have loved you’, which means share your Entropy and information with other self-similar beings of your species or culture (in more reduced, tribal religions, which have not evolved verbally to understand that we all humans belong to the same species) so you can create an efficient social organisms, nation, God, civilization, all parts of the whole: mankind.

It is thus obvious that to maximize the function of exi=stence and its åctions has self-similar expressions in all languages of the Fractal Universe – reason why indeed, in English the verbal expression, to exist and the equation, exi=st is self-similar

The physical description of the mandate gives origin to the type of physical Isomorphisms, which describe the geometrical forms generated by those cycles of time in physical entities.

The verbal, historic description gives origin to the type of memes, Books of Revelation or Codes of Isomorphisms that are handed from generation to generation and develop human societies, which are either Religious bodies of God, the temple of the spirit, the ‘word that became man and inhabited among us’, Saint John 1.1, (God means then the subconscious collective of a social organism, expressed through the verbal mandates of its prophets that tell the believers to maximize their collective existence through the arrow of social love).

The result is what you see around you, the game of existence of infinite points of view, trying to gauge more information and Entropy, to maximize its reproductive and social existence, forming knots of time arrows at individual and collective level in all scales of reality.

Recap. The Universe is a game played by infinite actors, which try in all scales of reality to maximize their Entropy and information in order to multiply and share that Entropy and information with self-similar particles, forming networks and superorganisms. The function of maximal existence can be expressed in all languages, Max. Sp X Tƒ is its logic and mathematical expression, ‘grow and multiply’’ its most successful verbal expression (Bible). The will of times is also expressed in verbal mandates by Biologists (theory of evolution as a struggle for existence) and explains our existence as human beings at all levels.

 

As a consequence of all this, all systems try to maximize its function of existence: Max Sp xTƒ=∑ST±4

And from this fact as survival program arouses as all beings will:

Try to process Sp, storing energy for future motion and moving faster in its field. ∆Sp ∆A

Perceiving more detailed worlds, ∆ï, and reproducing its information, ∆œ

And finally multiplying its åctions and evolving socially with other beings into bigger systems that maximize the existential force of the system and make it survive, ∆U,

The reprod/action of those 5 åctions, R(æ,e,ï,œ,û), becomes thus the meaning of existence, and as they take place along the different planes of existence of the being, they define a program of existence, coded by every super organism with a different language.

Thus we call the function of existence: Entropy x Information ExI= ST±4 Planes of Space-Time.

The Function of Existence, is thus what we try to maximize through our åctions, in each world cycle of life and death, followed by any entity of the Universe Max. Sp x Tƒ = ST.

Thus 2 decades ago when i like to philosophize about the 5th dimension, I would write Tƒ  ExI=ST is somehow a magic word which means as an equation what it means as a word, Tƒ=zero point of perception, with a will to Absorb Energy, Sp, move in Space, S, Perceive Information, T, Iterate, Reproduce, I, and do so in a social environment, across planes of existence was what all was about.

But there is a more geometric way to see the function of existence, as a ternary System, TRS, with a head, Tƒ that guides a body/wave that combines the energy and information of the system, ExI, in balance with the larger space-time world, ST±4, in which it proportionally enact its åctions.

And so we could define literally a function of existence, ∑ ExI=ST, and each point of view had a simple function:

Tƒ: ExI=ST, that was all to move in Space and feed on Energy, to Iterate, to perceive information, to perform your world cycle of life and death.

An Existential Being, is a ternary organism, with its entropic, informative and reproductive parts, an St entity a symmetry of time cycles and spatial membranes.

We are games of time and topology… The capacity to realize entropic, informative and reproductive motions, which become åctions by virtue of form, and reproduced, autonomous existence, when enough intensity and density of energy and information is provided to them, will thus appear as a zero Point and start to ‘reprod-act’ ‘reproduces its 5 cyclical åctions’ of exchange of energy and information across the planes of existence that surround him, a larger 0±1 World, with a frequency that determines the intensity of its ‘momentum’.

In the articles of existential algebra we deal with the general equations of ‘the mandate’ of existence:

‘Feed on energy, move with it, perceive, reproduce your information and evolve socially, ∆Sp,˙∆A, ∆ï, ∆œ, ∆U’, Max. ∑Sp x Tƒ, which is achieved by multiplying those ‘Reprod-åctions’ across planes of existence, ∆0±4

Whereas we use the symbol ∆ as a symbol for ‘Action’, an ‘infinitesimal change’ on the Existential force of a ‘whole being’.

In the next graph we show those åctions:

5th bestsn human

qnumbers

In the graph, the åctions of existence of human beings, or ‘drives’ of life, moving, feeding on energy, perceiving, reproducing and evolving socially in groups and its equivalent in the quantum world, coded by the 4 main quantum numbers, which measure the structural energy of the electron, is ‘energy jumps due to feeding in electromagnetism’, its social order, produced by its magnetic fields, and its decouplings and iterations according to the ± similarity of spins. In each system, a 4, 5 ‘genetic system of vowels’ code the process of each relative particle-point of the Universe.

RECAP: The program of the Universe and its fundamental concepts that generate all realities can be resumed in some simple points:

  1. From 1 comes 2: The Universe of space-time is the ultimate simplification of a world made of multiple åctions of spatial Entropy and temporal information, performed by an infinite tapestry of complementary systems composed of both ‘formal motions’.
  2. From 2 comes 4: There are 4 åctions of Entropy and time, each one with an internal and external, negative or positive direction: The simplex åctions of Entropy (external motion and internal feeding). The simplex åctions of time (external cyclical motion, and internal perception). And their 2 complex combinations: SxT, or external ‘åctions’ and internal reproductions’ and ∑SxT, the fractal, social repetition of those åctions, which creates external herds that feed on Entropy along an external network or super-organisms structured with inner networks that deliver Entropy and information to all its cells.
  3. All systems of the Universe are defined as ‘knots’ of those 4 type of åctions, which are cyclical and discontinuous, as each being switches between them, trying to survive by feeding (Sp), perceiving (I), reproducing (SxT) and evolving socially ∑SxT. We define the central point of those knots as a P.O.V. or fractal Non-Euclidean point, the ‘apperceptive’ engine that orders the Universe. And there are infinite of them.

Superorganisms: The outcome of this structure is a fractal Universe, in which knots of cyclical åctions become herds and super organisms, in which the ‘informative network’ emerges again as a knot that controls the åctions of the herd, packing it tightly as a new ‘cell-point’ of a new ‘fractal’ scale of the Universe.

We must understand the structure of those worlds.

The Universe has man as its center, perceived sandwiches around itself inward and outward, of larger wholes made of smaller beings with a higher, ∑-parameter of quanta of relative entropy and relative information.

Once a zero point is born in that environment it will start to en-act in iterative cycles its energy, information, outward and inward impulses and establish social and Darwinian events with other points. This birth of a point thus implies a series of events points do by merely existing as systems of 3 varieties of bidimensional topological membranes with motions

It is the program of the Universe, which we all do:

Act, Repeat your åctions of exi=stence.

Sp x Tƒ = ST±4

Now if we write the generator of existences in a somehow self-explanative word:

Max. Sp x Tƒ = sT, maximize the existence of the being, both as a system of ‘motions in time’, entropy and its continuous sum of motions, space, on one side and its forms, of information and cycles of moving time on the other.

Maximize your function of existence. The formula interpreted in those terms becomes both an existential philosophy and mathematical description of systems. Max. Sp x Tƒ means Maximizes your existence (in the most common formula used here).

Max. Exi = ST means the same. And this is what points of view do once they have surface as fractal points with inner topologies that allow the creation of a homeomorphic correspondence between its Poincare conjecture (definition of a mind as c instant mapping in O of a relative ∞ external membrane-universe.

But how you maximize this product, of your spatial entropy, Sp,  free motions and cyclical, orderly information, how you maximize your body and mind, your existence? The answer is that a product maximizes when S=T, S=T, and so the being obtains an immediate mandate after trying to find an strategy to survive better with maximal  Existential force.

Thus this series of harmonies: ∑ Sp≈S, ∑O≈T, Sp ≈ Tƒ, not only establish certain tendencies in time and space, the ‘primacy’ of what we call present, hyperbolic or planar geometries, which re all pervading in the universe and the basic ‘first society’.

The Universe is organic, not mechanical. But to fully understand this fact we have to upgrade the 4D abstract paradigm of physical sciences to a larger view and understanding of the world cycles of all physical, biological and sociological systems of the Universe.

The organic structure of the Universe is proved by a series of common properties, which we call ‘isomorphisms’ that all systems follow, themselves based in the existence of 3 ‘logico-mathematical’ properties observed from that Universe:

Topological Properties studied by Œ-Geometry.
Temporal Properties studied by Æ-Algebra.
Infinitesimal Properties studies by Analysis.
Now we must understand the foundation of physical sciences, to be the Galilean-Einsteinian relativity explained by Poincare: we cannot distinguish motion from form. So we have two states, one of still space and one of spatial form.

Yet since still-space and motion-time are two states of the same being, we say that all beings are dual systems of space and time, and to understand how of this simple duality all other beings form, we must consider the next stage which is the beat between both states, which need a transitional dual zone of decelerations and accelerations to move from stop to go states. This results in 2+2 elements, the 2 still and steady state motion inertial states, and the 2 transitional acceleration and deceleration, and we call the 4 forms of motions as:

Space-still form no motion death

first age of life, decelerating young motions

steady state, time, present state,

and future, informative cyclical motion, accelerated towards…. big bang of death.

And thus we deduce from the simplest fact that there are motion and stillness, space and time the equation of the life-death cycle that defines all systems of the Universe as organic: since what we have described before, the sequential world cycle of life and death of all systems, is also the sequential sum of a series of ±∆e x i åctions that change the levels of energy and information of the system. As this happens the beings transits through the 5th dimension in a life death cycle.

PART II.  NON-ARISTOTELIAN, FRACTAL POINTS: ¡LOGIC MATHEMATICS. 

1. The fractal point, Non-Euclidean, logic geometry
2. Duality
3. trinity
4. Decalogic: infinite scales of Superorganisms.

∆ ¬E ¡LOGIC GROWTH.

Non-Aristotelian Times and Non-E Topology

‘God is logos, of a higher logic than man’ Saint Augustine

‘Each point is a world in itself.’ Leibniz, On the Fractal, organic Point, the Fundamental particle.

”Nothing is new under the sun’ Spanish Proverb, on the repetition of all time beings & its cycles of in/form/ation.

‘To be or not to be that is the question’ Shakespeare, on the world cycle of existence.

 S<≈>T  arrows

The formalism of GST requires an upgrading of Euclidean Mathematics and Aristotelian Algebra and as a consequence of our epistemology of knowledge, which becomes the 3 fundamental new disciplines of formal sciences:

  1. Non-E mathematics with its definition of the 5 postulates of geometry in terms of fractal, non euclidean points.
  2. Non-A Logic which describes the ternary causality of the Universe.
  3. And the homologic method of truth of ‘stiences’ of space-time beings based in the same laws or isomorphisms across scales.

Because we are made of space and time, of energy and information, the sciences of space, topology and time, logic, and its combination (mathematics as a whole discipline, where logic enters in the demonstration and structure of its postulates), is the most REALIST of all stiences, as it deals DIRECTLY with the properties of the 3 elements of reality:

  • ∆nalysis, which studies how ‘finitesimals’ become larger wholes, integrated in time ‘frequencies’ or ‘spatial populations’ – often both, as frequencies become once created in time populations in space; which we greatly advance on the whys and explanations of calculus and its applications to sciences, through the enhanced concepts of ‘finitesimals’, ‘simultaneity’, ‘synchronicity’, ‘resonance’ and ’emergence’.
  • S-topology, which studies the ternary varieties of organic systems and how they peg together to form a system; which we shall explain by evolving the postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.
  • T-Algebra, which studies the rules of causality of a Universe with 3 time arrows, and its fundamental equations (generator equation, function of existence, equation of time ages).

Let us very briefly introduce those concepts which are the foundations of all stiences and it species in ‘exi=st¡ence’.

Non-e Mathematics: fractal mind-point, wave-line, organic plane and laws of similarity. 

Upgrading of philosophy of science needed to fully understand the fractal Universe requires to improve the main human language, which we use to mirror the space-time beings of reality, what we shall call from here on non-Æ, i-logic mathematics, which comes after Aristotelian logic and Euclidean mathematics:

I-LOGIC GEOMETRYb

In the graph, the upgrading of physical systems, to fully describe all its mathematical, logic and organic properties, requires to set the foundation of physics in more solid grounds that the ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ of Mr. Hilbert, referring those lines, points and planes to real Universal entities (1st, 2nd, 3rd postulates of non-e mathematics). And expand the temporal logic of the Universe to include the 3 arrows of relative, finite past, present and future of all systems of nature. Finally the 2 postulates of Hilbert’s axiomatic method, of congruence, which can only be of relative similarity, as we never have the full information about a system, (3rd postulate) and continuity (which is false and not required in pan geometry, as all networks of points communicated by waves of energy and information, leave discontinuous dark spaces not crossed by those networks), must be clarified. Finally the 5th postulate of Non-E Geometry, the only one properly defined till date, which allows infinite parallels of energy and information to cross a fractal point, defines the structure of a logic mind-mapping, constructed with those flows of information, and hence the equation of any monad mind on the Universe: O (infinitesimal point) x ∞ (cycles of energy and information of the Universe) = ∆: constant mapping of a certain scale of the 5th dimension.

Logic mathematics is the language we humans use in science to describe the Universe. As such it is only natural that its 3 ‘linguistic mirrors’ or sub-disciplines, correspond to the 3 ‘elements’ of the fractal Universe:

  • Geometry and the 3 topological varieties corresponds to space and its 3 canonical, organic parts.
  • Analysis to the 5th Dimension and its scales of infinitesimal, derived points and integral wholes.
  • And algebra corresponds to the temporal analysis of the structures of the fractal Universe, resumed in its generator.

So an immediate task to upgrade human sciences to the fractal paradigm is to study its formalism, through a natural upgrading of the foundations of those 3 disciplines to match the 3 elements of the fractal, organic Universe.

Now as we said we have two LEVELS OF DEPTH:

  • THE FIFTH DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE, as we have and will use to explain most of this blog.
  • The complete mathematical model of a 10 dimensional Universe, whose formalism we shall integrate slowly mainly on the 3rd line with 3 dimensions of time (ages) space (topologies) scales in a ∆±1 organism and the whole its mind. THIS IS THE FULL DESCRIPTION OF A SUPERORGANISM SO WHEN WE DEAL WITH SUPERORGANISMS IN ONLY 3 SCALES OF THE 5th dimension – which happens to be always as that is what our mind truly scans and integrates, so it can be also studied the whole universe in this manner as the graph shows, we shall bring the 10th concept back. And of course, THE 10TH CONCEPT IS WHAT WILL BECOME STANDARD: 10 DIMENSIONAL SPACE-TIME, 3 space 3 time 3 scales one whole ∆+1 mind-point that integrates it all.

The idealist logic of mathematical physicists vs. ternary reality

ALL THIS i-logic geometry IS completely NEW. Why?

Because humans do not have a basic picture of the 3 components of the Universe. We do believe in a certain mathematical structure called a continuum simple space-time. So our view of the first elements of the Universe, is very reductionist and simplistic, and so the mathematical mirror the ancients took of it, is also simplistic. And when in the XX century they found a much more complex Universe, of multiple scales of space, and multiple cyclical time vortices – particles, charges, masses, molecular clocks, galactic clocks, etc.as the initial mirror of mathematics was a distorted one, things got messy and remain so.

So the cartesian single space-time continuum is a geometric simplification, which despite the revolution of non-Euclidean mathematics, quantum physics and relativity is still with us.

It is based in a geometry called Axiomatic, which came after we found out that points were fractal points that could be crossed by ∞ parallels (5th non euclidean postulate) and so the definitions of Euclid were not good. Yet instead of defining as we shall do a fractal point, XX c. mathematicians left them undefined. So terms like points, lines, and planes still do not much its universal, referential reality.

In essence mathematicians scared of the non-Euclidean revolution, which was incomplete, invalidated the postulates of Euclid but didn’t find the new, real ones.

So instead, Hilbert, a mathematician said that he ‘imagined points, lines and planes’. So they must be undefined in relationship with the real Universe and what was an act of absolute arrogance, he implied that the human mind invented mathematics, the only language of the Universe, so somehow we invented the universe – no joke, today this means that physicists invent an equation that describes an imaginary particle, or evaporating black hole, or string theory and will affirm dogmatically without experimental evidence that it is real. While quantum physicists believe the Universe is made of mathematical symbols, which is exactly what religious people think, when they say that God created the Universe talking with words – so Allah created the Universe ‘naming’ it. And finally since mathematics are imagined, they require not evidence: only logic coherence not experimental evidence justify mathematics. And this is a dogma, even if Godel proved that mathematics without experimental evidence is not coherent.

IT MUST BE NOTICED THAT ®=i-logic mathematics is A REALIST stience, so the UNITS OF mathematics are again REAL:

  • Fractal points in geometry; numbers in algebra and finitesimals in Analysis, which are in fact 3 sides of the same being – the social St-point/number/finitesimal unit of all mathematical disciplines.

Existential algebra thus defines numbers as social wholes, and the laws of numbers the generic laws of those social wholes.

Hilbert’s axiomatic method is therefore not truth – as Godel proved with its incompleteness theorem, but arrogant, ego-centered mathematicians wanting to have the ‘exclusive language of god’ resolved, have been denying or a century.

Mathematics is the most experimental of all sciences, dealing with the structure of space and the logic of time, and so we need to evolve and defined its undefined elements. Only then the revolution started by Lobachevski aiming to substitute Euclid’s points with no breath, will make sense and mathematics will become again a proper mirror to look at the Universe – or rather we will understand why the mathematical mirror is so good.

So what is a point?: A unit of fractal space, which a mirror mind will see with less or more information the closer it is to the point. Hence while from far away it seems a point with no breadth, as we come closer it can fit infinite parallels. And so a line has also width, in detail carrying information and motion; and a plane is discontinuous, made of points joined by waves, which leave dark spaces between them. We thus talk of fractal points, waves and networks as the 3 units of i-logic mathematics.

Points then become defined as fractal points that grow in size, planes as networks of space points with wave-like motions in time, which become bidimensional, from far away, as we do not see the height of those points. And 3-dimensional systems, become the merging of perpendicular networks, which have more content of energy, when they are flat and extended, and more content of information when they are high and cyclical.

So for example in a previous graph, we can see 2 fractal space-time beings made of ‘mathematical topologies’: a field of space-time light, with a flat bidimensional magnetic field of energy and a tall informative perpendicular field of electricity merging into a light ray, which reproduces along the c-speed axis.

Yet we can see the final stage of evolution of light space-time, which evolved into particles, atoms, molecules, cells and human organisms, and surprisingly enough, in the same manner the probability of finding the particle-head or photon of a light system is maximal in the top of the electric wave, the informative head of a human being is also in the dimension of  informative height? Why, because geometrically, that is the point of maximal perception for both the photon and the human. And in both cases motion goes along the lineal direction of length, and in both cases energy is stored in the width dimension of the body and magnetic field.

Now, we are talking (-: It is indeed the most astounding truth of the Paradigm of relational space-time, first expressed by Leibniz – a Universe made of fractal space-time beings – that the properties of space-time and its mathematical topologies, perceptive, informative geometries, and ternary structures are carried and emerge in each new scale of social evolution of the Universe.

So while we have criticised the mathematical only view of earlier scientists, as we upgrade logic mathematics, in fact the Universe will become even more mathematical and logic that it was before, only that as Saint Augustine put it, the ‘logic of god, the mind of the Universe, is of a higher kind that our (Aristotelian) Logic’.

 

I. UNITY: THE ®, FRACTAL POINT

The first paradox of the Universe is that between unity and diversity, equality and similarity, numbers as undistinguishable social forms and points that must diverge at least in position, fermions and bosons, masses and individuals, wholes and parts, the one and the Universal…

It also come however to the concept of a fractal point, unit of reality, mind that has in itself a whole Universe made of infinitesimal pixels, an eternity could be spent talking of this paradox, which Parmenides first studied in the greek world.

Mind the reader, fractal points are NOT so new. Again, the great revolution of physics in the XX century happened when Einstein realized that a point was a ‘fractal point with volume’, since multiple parallels cross it. So it could not be Euclidean – with no breath, abstract, dimensionless.

 

The need to evolve the logic and mathematical ‘undefined’ elements of the Universe.

The key difference between a philosopher of science like Leibniz and a Physicist like newton is this: Leibniz as Aristotle and Descartes before him, was conscious that the language first defines the world we perceive, and NOT the Universe. So it is a humble realisation of the minimalist nature of human egos. The Physicist has reduced THE ENTIRE universe to the world-perception of a human light space-time ego centred point of view. So he lacks sense of humor and his arrogance is infinite. Because he confuses the infinitesimal of his mind with the infinite Universe. This we shall stress once and again. The physicist as all humans IS only an electronic mind that fits an infinite number of cyclical space-time beings, into a geometric linguistic mapping within its ‘monad’. And he is NOT aware of it. So his arrogance is supreme:

o-point x ∞ Universe of timespace cycles and worlds = fixed linguistic mapping

The 3 great philosophers of sciences of western thought (and their counterpart eastern philosophers of Taoist and Buddhist cultures) were always aware of this. The cut off happened when Kant rejected Leibniz and became a Newtonian. But at least kant realised that the human euclidean mind was a light space-mind and not necessarily all, as impressionist painters will latter.

Yet starting with Kant and then Hegel, which had the chuptzah (even if he understood perfectly the ternary logic of thesis-antithesis-synthesis similar to the Sp<ST>Tƒ ternary Universal Grammar of all systems) to affirm Abrahamic tribal religions were superior, because they only accepted the human ego-trip of tribal Yahweh, there is a growing anti quantum paradox in philosophers which yield as infinitesimal observers to the huge power of the observable, industrial world.

This paradox inverse to that of the physicist, so huge that influences the observer, made after Leibniz, all philosophers incomplete. As they no longer dare to criticise the makers of machines and weapons, and not even the Abrahamic tribal, lineal religions of the Bronze age that back the hate between members of the same species. So we of course show a complete indifference for all what has nothing to do with the larger Universe of infinite worlds, and find the arrogance of physicists, infantile.

Now I will state a provocation to the ego of physicists (-; Mind the reader though that my ‘selfies’ are ‘black humour’, i am an infinitesimal aware of it, but i like to bust the balls of ego-centered human infinitesimals, and none are so much ego-centered as physicists.

The advantage of being a philosopher of science, is that unlike a physicist, we DO know the essence of science which is ‘logic mathematics’. That is our profession. To understand the logic of mathematics. So despite Mr. Hawking’s quipping, that we philosophers of science are envious and that is why we criticize his evaporating black holes, because we ‘do not know mathematics’ the opposite is truth.

By definition the masters of philosophy of science HAVE created mathematics and logic, the languages of space and time, since the times of Plato and Aristotle to the times of Descartes, Leibniz and Hegel. And yes, this writer, duly ignored by ‘those who impose truth with power, to become the laugh of the Gods’ (Einstein, the only physicist I consider to the level of the best of our profession, which he greatly respected, along the rules of the scientific method, except when falling under the spell of Mr. Hilbert, and we will return to that).

Because the language of God is the logic of time cycles and the mathematics of spatial extensions. In this we are different from physicists who only apply the mathematics, we teach them. But especially we like the Logic behind the language of mathematics, which creates it. So let us rephrase it. Yes, Physicists do know as much mathematics as we do. And their computers even more (-;

But they do not understand the logic of it. And that is the problem. Because logic is a property of time cycles, and its repetitive causality, logic is more important that geometry. Logic is ‘the beginning’. So the Greeks called God the mind of the Universe, Logos, derived from ‘word’, not ‘geometry’ meaning “Earth measurement.” And that makes the whole difference, physicists do not grasp. As what they do is ‘geometry’, measure. We philosophers of science do Logos, (-;

Now, we told you, we will evolve mathematics, so we can fit the new concept of cyclical time and fractal space within it, as Descartes and Leibniz did to fit their time vortices and relational infinite times, as Einstein did (not by himself but by applying non-Euclidean mathematics to his description of space).

So to that aim, we just need to complete the scaffolding of mathematics and explain what a mind is, in geometric logic terms.

So we need to complete the concept of fractal quanta of energetic space of quantum physics, the concept of a Universe of multiple time cycles of Einstein, and the philosophy of science, made of causal repetitions of time cycles called laws of science.

Thus we affirm that the Eastern, O-Cyclical concept of Time; and the E-insteinian, Relativistic concept of space, which we shall call, Œ, is superior to the ‘lineal, Abrahamic, concept of time’ and Absolute’ Newtonian, concept of Space.

I like to play with ‘words’. So you could think that A-brahamic, Lineal, A-bsolute Space-time is a simplified, earlier version.

And we shall go even further, into the Non-AE, (Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean), i-nformative concept of Space-time.

And build a new Non-Aristotelian Logic and Non-Euclidean Mathematic formalism, which will set the foundations for a new paradigm of science.

This new Geometry is simple and evident. It is based in the definition of the ‘terms’ which mathematics ill-defined in Euclidean Geometry, points with no parts through which only one parallel crosses, lines with no breath and shallow planes, equaled by superposition, and then once Euclidean Geometry was found to be a ‘limit’ of a larger pan- Geometry NOT lineal but curved inwards (elliptic) or outwards (hyperbolic), on those dark times of confusions, were UNDEFINED.

So we DID not resolve the issue. We CANNOT ESTABLISH the fundamental science of the Experienced Universe, by undefining its fundamental elements. This no way out sponsored by Cantor, who substituted points and numbers by sets, nowhere to be seen in experience, and Hilbert who affirmed ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’, is a failure.

In that regard, the founder of Non-Euclidean geometries Lobachevski was in the right track. We can summarize Lobačevskiĭ’s solution of the problem of the Fifth Postulate.

  1. The postulate is not provable. Because, infinite lines curve when we have a larger view, becoming exponential inversion of space-time.
  2. By adding the opposite axiom to the basic propositions of geometry a logically perfect and comprehensive geometry, different from the Euclidean, can be developed, providing we limit infinity, (as the 5th dimension shows) hence parallels do NOT meet on the infinity, and by curving them (hence lines are part of cycles)
  3. The truth of the results of one logically conceivable geometry or another in its application to real space can only be verified experimentally.

Thus we must observe the Universe to prove mathematical statements and reduce mathematics as we do with all experimental sciences to those equations which ‘are real’.

The evolved formalism of i-logic mathematics: Upgrading Geometry.

Now, we shall be less literary and start with very solid conceptual elements, namely describing the essence of the fractal paradigm.

And to that aim we shall bring, in the simplest possible form, the fundamental formalism of the Fractal Paradigm, ‘non-euclidean, non-aristotelian i-logic, o-rganic mathematics’.

We call it i-logic because in time, it is more complex, with multiple clocks and i comes after the A of Aristotle (the logic built with a single time clock and a single causal arrow) and we call it organic because in space is more complex, with multiple co-existing spaces, smaller parts that become wholes and O comes after the E of Euclid (geometry with a single continuous space made of points with no breath). But in brief, we shall just talk of Non-Æ, or i-logic mathematics.

So we shall now explain and complete at a very elemental level far more developed in the ∆±∞ posts on i-logic mathematics, the formal language of the fractal paradigm, what truly Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian space-time languages are.

Fractal point with breadth and the networks and social organisms they make, connected together.

Einstein found that the Universe was non-euclidean, that is, points did have breath because they could fit many parallels of energy and information. And so they are ‘fractal points’ that grow in size when we come closer to it. But they forgot to change the first postulate of Euclid, and left points undefined, so this simple change of mathematics will open completely the world of science to the fractal paradigm. Let us see how.

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel

Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:

. ____________

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

A point external to a line is crossed by parallel forces.

             Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points:           ===========o

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘Ðimotions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.

How dust of space-time becomes a complex system and organises the scalar universe of parts that become larger wholes, from atoms to galaxies, from amino acids to social super organisms of life, is then the ultimate process to describe departing from the properties of all forms of dust of space-time. Those fractal points do organise constantly into larger systems, whose summit of complexity is a super organism, in which all those points of different size, speed and form co-ordinate its actions, motions and forms into larger, synchronic super organisms, which however are never eternal, but end up dissolving after its world cycle of existence ends, back into its smaller, fractal parts, loosing its information in the moment of death.

And yet the whole Universe is eternal because motion, entropy never stops. It is the ultimate substance of it all. And so we could say the Universe lives an eternal present as dust evolves into organic forms, emerge as a larger whole in a scalar, bigger world, where it develops its algorithms of existence, absorbing energy and information for its body waves and particle-heads, repeating its structure in other regions of space-time, and finally dissolving back; once and again, per in secula seculorum, the Universe repeats those simple games.

And so it can be considered a fixed block of 5Dimensions of space-time, where certain paths will imprint certain beings, which will again dissolve, as a screen of a television can run infinite softwares, which will be waves of form that disappear while the hardware stays. That hardware is what we call temporal energy, the motion with form of which we are all made:

 

II. DUALITY

 

The second set of paradoxes incremental in complexity come from the 2, duality and its flows, which merge in the reproductive middle, iteration of both. But the I-logic paradoxes that matters most for a language are those of perception.

Such paradoxes concern thus with the duality of ∆-1 quantum discontinuity and ∆+1 continuous whole due to the different angle of perception, elliptic, minimal on the upper layers where the informative, invisible networks that enslave us but make us feel free reside, vs. the parts we manage to control below of which we extract almost all its information, while in the same plane we are cartesian, democratic equalitarian.

Thus we are slaves of the networks above we don’t see, enslave our lower planes and live with equal e-motions with those in the same plane.

It is in that semi plane when the continuous and discontinuous merge into variations of form, the mobile and immobile of faster smaller time cycles and slower larger ones merge into the variety of speeds and the lineal flat view from below and closed view from above merge into the variety of conic curves.

The paradoxes of duality were ill-understood by physicists making physics the simplex merely mathematical system it is today, but much better understood by Heraclitus and those who came from the east:

.

SCALE Dis-Continuity;  SPACE=Form V. TIME=Motion.
AGE: $t-open youth vs. ð-closed 3rd age.
How Dimensions in space, merge with motions of time? The answer is that all yin has a yang, all yang has a yin, all dimension has motion, all form has motion.
THE BEST WAY TO EXPLAIN IT is then through the paradoxes of the human mind that perceives often motion as form, often a cyclical complete world cycle as a mere open step or line, and cannot see the duality of parts and wholes proper of the 5th dimotion or social evolution. Let us then study those elements or paradoxes, which humans normally only study as either one thing or the other.

Yet both time=motion and space=form are ultimately mirror images of each other:

The 3 paradoxes of Galileo. T-Motion vs. S-Form, ∆… Continuity vs. discontinuity, $t-flat, open vs. §ð-curved order

‘The earth moves and doesn’t move’. Galileo: relativity and duality of space and time dimensions.

‘A Ðimotion can be perceived as a distance=dimension of space or a motion=change in time or both together’ l§

Einstein studied space as the simultaneous measure of different regions of the temporal Universe. His explanations though were a bit complex, dragging onto the tradition of lineal time and continuous space. It is all simpler. Space is a ‘mental’ perception in simultaneity of different regions of moving time cycles, which the mind simplifies, by extracting information in many ways (motion, scales, third dimension, etc.)

Physics has really been concerned since Galileo realized the earth moved but we do not perceive motion, with the paradox of RELATIVITY of motion vs. stillness. But the duality was not understood, neither the contribution of the mind to the ‘maya of sensorial stillness’ that gives us the ‘perception of space’.

Because all things move, and stillness is a maya of the senses, Galileo was right when he realized the Earth moved. But the important question science has missed ever since, and  Einstein would latter explain in relativity is why we see the Earth still if it is moving. Again, we shall fully solve the conundrum when we define the equation of the mind. But as this is the icing on the cake of the cyclical universe, we shall bring it now here.

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

The next graph illustrates the 3 main dualities or paradoxes of endophysics (Physics in which the observer’s mind is also accounted for): motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single §pace vs. fractal scales of spar, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:image005
In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles. THEY SEEM TO BE FLAT but in detail they are curved. And they seem to be still but they move. So those are the 3 main paradoxes of perception: MOTION VS. FORM, FLAT OPEN, VS. CURVED, ORDERED, and CONTINUOUS VS. DISCONTINOUS.

Moreover, what appears as a single ðime§pace continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks.

THUS Galilean relativity though was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of smaller self-similar systems. Those are pending questions solved with a simple statement, which shall double our dimensions of reality:

“Since we cannot distinguish motion in time and form in space, all systems are space-time systems with at least 2 dimensions, as to each motion in time corresponds a form in space: S=T”

So how physicists called the 3 arrows/dimensions/ages/motions of time? They have a conceptual mess made around them. Of course they study them but do not name it clearly as 3 different time dimensions.

The paradoxes of space and time is the key to understand the paradoxical laws that rule the exi=stiences of space-time species, which occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time. They are all embedded in the topological ternary nature of form, and the different quantity of information (discontinuous) and entropyy (continuous) we perceive in larger spaces (max entropy) and smaller ones (max. information) according to the deceptively simple metric of 5D:

Size in Space x Speed of Time cycles = constant: $ x ð = K

Dis-continuous paradox.

In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance. When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception:

Any piece of time/space seems continuous, from the lower ∆-1 perspective, as larger planes of reality with slower time cycles transmit less information, and we peg it together those bits of information, jumping over its dark spaces; but when we analyze its parts in detail, we receive more information so the system becomes discontinuous, made of space/time quanta moving in cyclical paths.

Thus of great importance for all sciences are the dualities between the ‘extreme scales’ of the being – its ¡-1 discontinuous cellular/individual scale and its ¡+1 continuous larger world, observable for example in the quantum discontinuous vs. Einstein’s continuous larger cosmological world, or the discontinuous cells and the continuous membrane that encloses the organism inits largest view, including the infinitesimal mind, and so on.

The key to the Unification of Organic and Physical Sciences is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend? Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought.

There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.

The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws.

It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:
- The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).
- And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being.

Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in Mhz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second.
The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy.
We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms.
And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:

And we call its perceptive dualities of ‘Endophysics’ the Galilean Paradox, as humans perceive the Earth still as a whole space. But as we increase the quantity of information=truth we perceive it becomes a rotating, moving mass of atomic clocks (‘e pur si muove e pur no muove’).

Definition of a Dimension as motion and distances.

The first truism of scalar space-time theory, is the concept of a fractal, scalar Universe that becomes fractal, broken, discontinuous, grows in size, creating new ‘isomorphic scales’ and acquires motion, when we observe it in detail.

Thus the universe of space-time in a less detailed relativistic perception is unique, continuous, still. But in detail, in a quantum vision has motion-’—motions’, it is discontinuous, made of ‘fractal quanta’, which show cyclical clock-like motions – hence it is made of infinite time cycles and fractal spaces, which are organized in scales of size, which grow in information and speed of its rotary cycles when we come closer to them, as fractals do.

And this transition from continuous abstract, ‘background’, absolute space-time to relative, scalar, fractal space and time cycles, with more information of which all things are made is the essential change from classic 4D to 5th dimensional sciences.

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study:

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple åctions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together:

All entities exist in a dual state of internal, ‘vital’ space with no relative motion between its parts and external time motion. All has a function in time and a form in space. As Schrodinger’s cat, all is dead and alive…

The Paradox of Galileo explains those dualities of motion and stillness, continuity and discontinuity and the fractal scale of non-Euclidean points, which grow in size and form according to the point of view of the observer. Yet since motion, discontinuity and fractal structure becomes evident as we come closer to the object, increasing our information and the truth of an entity is a direct function of the quantity of information we have of it, a Universe made of motions NOT substances, of discontinuous, fractal space-time, not of continuum fixed space is more truth.

Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Yet the fractal, discontinuous, moving, scalar description is logically more truth. Indeed, in the formalism of Non-Aristotelian logic, ‘truth=information’ is measured in terms of probabilities and is a function which increases proportionally to our closeness to the entity we study and so it reaches 1, when information and truth become the same only when we occupy the same space-time than the being – that is, as Haldane put it: ‘Only the Universe (or any being) has all the truth (information) about itself’.

So we define the dual nature of dimensions: ‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance.’

Hence motions of particles and reproductions of waves can generate dimensions. In the lower scale dimensions are in fact defined by the reproduction of lineal strings, laterally, into bidimensional planes and 3 dimensions by the reproduction of a cyclical closed string into tubes.

In the Universe at large, space is a planar vacuum, teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); and its ‘units of substance are rotating Galaxies, their time-clocks. Some consequences of this Galilean duality:

– The vacuum of our scale of space-time is made of light, which can be seen as a single sheet of fixed space-distance or as electromagnetic motion at c-speed. Since vacuum is filled even in its minimal energy density by a background radiation light – a fact that explains the creation of virtual particles, the first condensation of ‘—motions’- space into light waves or clocks of time (closed light paths, which start with the ‘first’ clock, the electron, a condensed density of light photons).

– Galileo’s paradox explains the immortality of the Universe, since a Universe made of motions cannot stop.

We are made of space and time, of spatial energy and temporal information. When we say I don’t have energy and time to do this is because we know subconsciously that we are made of a vital space that contains energy, our body and a brain that regulates our time cycles.

So it is a machine, made with a computer, sum of digital clocks and a body of iron regulated by those cyclical clocks.

So it is a physical entity made of energy that occupies space and particles, masses and charges that MUST be described as clocks of time, ‘vortex’ that turn in cyclical motions, as our pictures of them show – NOT particles with a substance but knots of time clocks.

Thus we consider that most systems of the Universe are ‘complementary systems’ made of lineal fields/bodies of energy/space quanta and cyclical heads/particles of temporal information. In the graph we can see how reality is made of infinite clocks of time that carry information. So we blow the absolute time of the 4th dimension in infinite details: T=∑o

And we blow the single Space, S in infinite surfaces of energy in motion: S=∑Sp.

Since in the new paradigm there are infinite clocks of time that measure with different frequencies different forms of information. And there are infinite spaces that store energy in motion.

And the duality between those 2 ‘arrows or motions of space-time’, |-Motion, space or ‘—motions’ and cyclical motion, clocks of time or information, either perceived in stillness as lineal or cyclical form or in motion as lineal speed or cyclical speed structures the Universe.

All what you see are combinations of those 2 essential substances, very complex sometimes, but combinations of 2 elements, and the laws of those combinations is what the 5th dimension studies, since once we group them all we find regularities, synchronicities, patterns tat allow us to define space and time as a whole.

In the graph we see ‘—motions’ forms (lineal bodies, weapons, fields of energy-light) and its complementary systems of information processing of time processing (cyclical eyes and cameras, electric fields of light).

Each clock creates a discontinuous space-time, whose cyclical perimeter of in-form-ation encloses a piece of energetic space breaking reality into ∞ formal patterns; different time cycles with specific forms and frequencies. Thus the use of a single human clock that equalizes all of them misses 2 features of each of those time cycles:

– Its specific forms of in-form-ation in space, which gives birth to the main topological laws and Isomorphisms of the 5th Dimension (I).

– Its different speeds or frequencies. Since cyclical time is measured not by duration but by frequency, its inverse function: ƒ(t)=1/T.

In the graph, galilean relativity was ill-understood, as the true question about time-change was why ‘we see systems still when they move’, and ‘why we see space as continuum, when in detail is made of quanta’, and why all systems are made of smaller self-similar systems.

Further on it reduced all time clocks to one, and made lineal time canonical ERASING our knowledge of the cyclical form, in-form-ation of those time cycles KILLING 2 essential features of time:

To be multiple and to be cyclical encoding the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of those cycles. THUS HE KILLED THE ARROW OF INFORMATIVE TIME, and as a consequence, as yin and yang no longer could combine, prevented scientists from defining properly energy as the combination of both, motion and form, streamlining our understanding of the equations of mathematical physics, which will from then on become mathematical manipulations void of most of its conceptual meaning, till arriving to the present ‘religious’ view of physical sciences, which shun off the whys they no longer understand.

Those are pending questions solved in 5D³, which the philosopher of science, Descartes, understood better than his mathematical disciple, Galileo, as philosophers depart from a ‘previous layer’, all the languages, hence all the minds that observe all timespace cycles; not a single language and a single clock-cycle, as physicists do eliminating all other ‘rival languages and beings’ AS IF THEY DID NOT EXIST. They do.

The paradox of Young, Motion vs Old Age, informative stillness: freedom vs. order.

A key element to understand the Universe of scales and its paradoxes of freedom vs. order is the perspective any mind has of reality when looking above, to its upper whole, which controls it through invisible networks of information, hence creating an elliptic perspective of decreasing perception – dark view of larger scales we do not observe, from invisible informative networks in galaxies to invisible financial networks in societies to invisible nervous networks for cells. On the other hand in the same scale we have a flat, euclidean geometry of maximal perception with minimal distortion:

While looking down to our smaller inner world we rule it with networks that break into fractal webs of simultaneous control, or hyperbolic view. This ternary view of reality has immense consequence from theory of knowledge, to mind constructs, from sociology of power to galactic organic models of a Universe ruled by invisible black holes and dark matter. We feel thus free as individuals but are controlled from above by the larger whole and rule over our micro-parts. As Shakespeare said: we are all kings from above, commoners or buffoons.

Another paradox happens between the dualities of the young, open, moving lineal age of the being and its old, still, curved, informative, cyclical one, which also manifests when we ‘expand in size’ and have a larger pov, where the flat earth to put the classic example becomes curved. And related to it the paradox of the opposition between time-motion vs. space-stillness.

It is the most complex and multifaceted of them all. As it defines also perception, and the wave-particle states… and ultimately the ego paradox…

When we add the fact that all systems move in a wave, mindless, ‘foggy’ state but gauge information from its still language/point of view, as a ‘particle-head’ they confuse with the whole Universe:

‘Every point of view considers the world it perceives from its self-centered still language the whole Universe, with ¡tself at the center’.

This is the paradox of egocy (ego=idiocy), which humans of course also show in extreme form, specially physicists with enhanced digital, mechanical instruments of measure. It is THE MAIN paradox of the mind.

Yet as the mind states are implosive reducing external motions to inner forms, the selfish-informative state is pposite to the young, mindless free moving state of the mind, focused on the external larger ¡+1 world:

The young moving state living externally ultimately sees an unbounded Universe; because the larger world in which it exists is only observed in its entropic and energetic parts; not in its information coming from networks above the being which are invisible.

This requires a bit of thought. Beings are nested beings, ∆±¡ structures, where ¡ is the larger whole and -¡ its minimal units used for the being to control informatively its inner parts. So paradoxically, the larger wholes which seem slower do have smaller parts in its inner informative networks which are faster; the larger wholes feed also in smaller beings. For example, the galaxy, which seems slower is regulated by non-local gravitation and dark entropy, we do not see because it is faster than our c-speed (so we think in a field of dark entropy that space is enlarging as we see its motion as invisible distance: paradox of the big-bang). The larger whale eats the smaller Plankton we do not see. The larger globalized metal-earth of company-mothers of machines controls nations and people with invisible flows of instantaneous digital money, we do not see or understand; the larger brain, with its giant neurons controls the smaller chemical cells with invisible flows of faster nervous messages.

So the being that lives in the larger world, sees it slower, and sees itself faster and free, but it is often bounded within the being that will limit him with its outer membrane and within, it will manipulate and strike it down, when needed with its faster informative network.

The ego paradoxes of the infinitesimal self-centered being.

∞º: EGOCY PARADOX Humans’  interpretation of the Universe is limited by their ego. It is NOT a problem of intelligence as many huminds have stretched our information but of ego. I.e. Self centered Huminds refuse to give living, organic properties to reality when it is too different from them. So physical systems are denied its Ðisomorphic properties.  The problem of human ego is so huge that we must always doubt of ‘science’ as culture and study a priori any human statement as biased by anthropomorphic egos – the sure path to discover the falsehoods of science. This is specially truth of physical statements, whose egocy comes as Goethe already noted from its higher technical senses, telescopes and microscopes that made him think more intelligent than other scientists. So man becomes the only intelligent being, the one who measures, the only one who speaks mathematics of measure, the language of God; reducing knowledge to locomotion numbers. In the graph, the homunculus physicus’ mind with handyman craftsmanship to kill with entropic weapons, a big mouth to talk idologies of human supremacism over the organic Universe he measures and a small childish brain filled with numbers that understands nothing.

Of all this dualities come the many paradoxes of the ego: The larger whole always appears to us dumb, because we do NOT perceive all the information of all its ∆±¡ scales, where our +¡ is smaller than its +¡, and our -¡, slower than its -¡.

So the intelligent Universe makes us feel our young ego free; and bold. The older mind though knows it won’t change the order of the larger world.

All of them in any case will see reality self-centered, in its mind that measures only a limited distorted amount of information, because the ∆º mind cannot perceive beyond its ∆±3 scales in which it performs its Ðimotions of exist¡ence, and thinks it is in the center of scale, as it is the region where its measure is more precise and from where more information flows into its mind.

Further on to fit in its infinitesimal all those dimotions, it eliminates motion and keeps dimensional form, in a fractal, smaller mirror images, converging towards the mind. So it sees reality still because it can gauge better its information, but unaware in its naive realism that its language is just a reduced mirror, it believes the being is still because it is dead. Reality is always dead for the scholar, academic mind that cares only about the language, without even realizing the language is WHAT IS DEAD, still, motionless.

The intelligence of the mind thus is truly a reductionist full paradox to keep each monad at its relative center, all of them, ∞º of existence. 

And so the ego paradox of the still mind confronts the entropy reality of the moving Universe; the ego-mind and the whole confronts the moving, disordering more powerful whole; and ultimately this is the eternal fight between the mind ordering, wanting to live eternally and the universe of motions, wearing, disordering it, killing it back to dust of space-time: ⌜𝝙@st.

So the 4 main ‘paradoxes of reality’ become then the paradoxes most common in all futile arguments of sciences in search of single humind dogmas. For example, those 4 paradoxes are at the heart of philosophy of physics. They are called in physics the paradox of relativity of motion vs. form that started classic physics, of continuity vs. discontinuity that divides quantum and relativity, hence starting modern physics, the duality of flat vs. curved, open vs. closed free vs. ordered, that is at the heart of ‘young physics’ (flat earth?!), and the ego paradox of the mind that measures and thinks to be above heavens and earth vs. the entropy arrow that will disorder it and physicists due to their worldly profession of making weapons prefer (without renouncing to feel as the scientists with better machines of measure, the ones that talk the only language of God, in their delirium tremens – numbers).

In this ultimate ego paradox we must inscribe the most important epistemological argument of science: the paradox of creationism, as each science believes its language and the limited properties it maps out of the whole are the only language of God and only properties of reality.

So we put in negrita the choices of dogmatic physics in those paradoxes, also in eternal disquisition between other scientists – so in medicine the paradox of the brain as a single block vs. the theory of neurons separated by synapsis was all the rage till Cajal draw them separated… not to speak of the systemic denial of the dimotion of reproduction in any system that doesn’t have our sacred ‘DNA’, when everything that moves and all moves by definition reproduces its in-form-ation when it reproduces its cyclical motion and science exists by definition because it observes repetitions of patterns of formal motions that we call laws of science. So ALL the paradoxes of ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of science are ultimately also a product of the ⌜∆@§t dualities and the ego paradox that doesn’t see them.

Physicists on the entropic arrow. Partial theories of it all.

So on one side they use the entropic dimensions as the single arrow of time of the Universe, studied in entropic systems, gases and dark entropy expanding between galaxies (but here they call it mistakingly dark energy). Then most extend this entropic arrow as the only one, disregarding crystal, informative and liquid, iterative waves of matter, which make the 3 arrows of time. And in cosmology disregarding the vortex of mass-information, in galaxies that compress the Universe balanced the big-bang. So they by lack of clear concepts about time arrows, sponsor a big-bang only theory of an expansive dying Universe, eliminating on their equations the inconvenient truth of implosive time-like accelerated clocks of masses and galactic vortices.

Physicists on the present arrow: relativity and energy conservation.

Then they also study the present, simultaneous, iterative space-time, with different tools, but conceptually messed. On one side they realise the combination of relative entropic motions and future mass particles, is conserved in the Universe, either as momentum, or as its integral in a closed repetitive cycle of conservative energy. But they do NOT CALL ENERGY the present arrow of time, they just say it is ‘conserved’, and do not know what it is.

Also they study this kind of conserved time with a formula, v=s/t, t=∂s/∂v. Whereas they measure infinitesimal moments in the process of motion, taking ‘present pictures’ of simultaneous space to refine its measure of speed (Einstein and Galilean relativity) So this measure of present stills of space-time with derivatives, is another analysis of present space, performed by Galileo and Einstein (special relativity). And as it requires NOT a change of state in its form, it is truly always indicated for studying a single ‘present’ state. So relativity science deals mainly with the single non chaining ðime§pace continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of small quanta of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of ðime.

Physicists on the future arrow: vortices of accelerated time in different scales: masses and charges.

Finally Einstein realized that time curves space into accelerated masses (general relativity, principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration). So he defined a future, accelerated vortex of time-information, a mass, which we extend to charges in the smallish quantum scale, and to thermodynamic eddies inout scale (graph) which are therefore the arrow of future information nature. Yet they do NOT either recognise charges and masses as fractal clocks of accelerated future time, as we do. So they cannot unify them (the saint grail of physics is an equation that unifies charges and masses and we shall easily provide merely by adapting the obscure jargon of electromagnetism to the simpler vortex-like jargon of gravitation: Newton>Poisson>Einstein).

So while physicists have in front of them the 3 dimensions of time, parallel to the 3 forms of space, they have a conceptual mess, due to the use of a single time clock and a single arrow of time, entropy, which makes them NOT to recognise the arrow of accelerated time in masses and charges, and the relationship between steady time-cycles and energy conservative cycles.

They also deny the capacity of those time vortices, particles, to process and gauge information, even if they act as ‘mathematical minds’, controlling the organic territory, they perceive. And so they miss the logic explanation of the paradox of Glalileo: particles as heads do, perceive information and gauge it in relative stillness. So as in a film, the process is an stop-particle-gauge information go-wave duality, which explains the paradoxes of relativity (c-constancy of speed, emitted in entangled stillness) and quantum physics (perception always of the particle stopped by the perceiver, as systems move in waves and gauge information as stopped particles).

IN THAT REGARD, PHYSICISTS miss the fundamental conceptual truth behind Galilean relativity: the Galilean paradox and its cause – the fact that minds map reality with languages, that are smallish, fixed forms and so when we perceive we reduce the 3+3 dimensions of space and time to 3 dimensions of space, to have a still image, as your eyes give it to you – with hardly any motion, to fit it all in the brain.

Thus because that description is the simplified reduced subjective vision of the human mind, which ‘stops motion’ to fit reality in its smallish brain we must conclude that the ‘real objective Universe’ is made NOT of spatial forms (a mind mirage) but of motions, not of a single continuum but many scales and clocks of time that enclose and break space into internal regions and outer worlds. So reality is about:

-Dimensional ðime Motions not distances; Scalar Spaces, broken and discontinuous (ab.§) not single §pace continuum; and cyclical in form ‘ðime§paces’, not lineal (as we have proved previously).

THE S≈T DIMENSIONS OF THE UNIVERSE.

Science started when Galileo realized that the earth moves objectively, externally but the mind sees still. So we cannot distinguish motion from form (Poincare) and as such, every dimension of form=space can also be seen as a dimension of time=motion. This means we shall see time-motions and space-forms together, giving origin to the first simpler topological dimensions:

In the graph the 3 dimensions of space and time. As we can see they correspond to the only 3 topologies of reality, and as such they combine in form and function to create in a single plane of space-time, all the systems we observe:  reality we see around is ternary made of 3 functional/formal space-time organs/networks that form super organisms:

In graph, different orders of the 5Dimensions of reality give birth to different entities, super organisms in a single present scale of time-space, ensembles of 3 basic forms, 1D particle-heads/3D wave-bodies and 2D lineal limbs/fields; but only when we add the lower dimension of ∑∆-1>∆º emerging seeds of information and its entropic dissolutions ∆º<∆-1, the full meaning of the game of exi=st¡ences, existences as space-time organisms studied by different stiences reach its full meaning.

Further on the 3 first dimensions are equivalent to the conservation processes of angular momentum – the first parameter perceived in the point, its motion, second parameter and reproductive strength, third parameter such as if we give an Active magnitude value as the scalar 1D and a vectorial momentum 2D number for the second dimension, we get equations of reproduction for the third dimension.

∑ LINEAL MOMENTUM ≈ LIMBS/POTENTIALS + ∑ANGULAR MOMENTUM: PARTICLES/HEADS = VITAL ENERGY

A dimensional definition of the Universe

So we talk also of 5D² systems of space-time meaning we divide and combine in ternary, s, s=t, t, groupings those 5D²

It follows that the sum of the tree, s + s=t + t gives us a full cycle, with the incissum that s=t = s+t, as it has coupled both:

The Universe is a supœrganism that re•produces information. And it does so towards a final aim, the reproduction of new super organisms, •5D² systems, of topo-bio-logical nature, with topologic, spatial, organic, scalar and logic, temporal properties.

As such the talking of it can be as detailed as a super organism is, which increases in complexity as it ‘covers up and down’ new dimensions of entropy and information brought together into a new ∆±i super organic structure:

In the graph, the three arrows of time of a world cycle are intimately connected to the three scales ∆±1 in which the supœrganism realises its existence, up and down the scales of the fifth dimension, from seminal birth into social existence and final extinction.

In the graph the ten dimensional organism, can easily be divided in ternary grouping according to topology or scale.

The most amazing thing about the dual fifth dimension of space-time that forms all the organisms of reality is that humans do NOT logically perceive it, despite being all around us, all being part of a partial perception of the •5D³ being, in 4D², 3D, 2 or • dimensions of existeence.

As such we humans have a hard time perceiving a full •5D³ being, let alone a simple 4D subject ordering around 3D objects, following the instructions of its holographic 2D mental sheets of information, as its moves in seemingly random lineal point-like cycles of exist¡enœ.

The whole beings in his whole action with his hole information only exists within itself.

How much information of the being we absorb to its stientific description is obviously relative to the mind that perceives it. At least a 5D³ being will need a thorough investigation of it at the three scales ∆º±1 above and below its 0-mind, pov; and through its three topologies of ðime$pace; as it performs its ∆±i ages of exist¡ence.

Existence rquires travels through the scales of the fifth dimension from that seminal to the emergent scales, in an ∆+1 social world back and forth through the eons of zero-sum beings.

As such a supœrganism is always defined from the human point of view of kaleidoscopic perception as a world cycle travelling through a given ∆±i symmetry we ‘perceive’ self-centred in ‘certain singularity-particles’ of certain stiences.

A super organism will be within the ‘limits’ of ∆±3 scales self-centred into the ∆º being (the seminal-world, ∆±1 scales; the energetic, ∆±2 scales, and the informative ∆±3 scales), a knot of Non-Æ flows of energy, information and, entropy, which make the ‘transference of’ motion and form’ between scales, as the being ‘lives’, grows, multiplies and orders a territory.

So each being is a knot-flow focused at ∆º and moving through an St±i ternary scale of stiences.

It is then this ∆º systems what we can study through different stiences and species, as the fundamental particle of the Universe, which will always follow the same ex i actions, trying to reproduce≈survive its complex ‘information’ as a knot of time-space cycles.

Dimensions are motions perceived as stillness.

The Paradox of Galileo, the key logic concept to understand the meaning of dimensions, astoundingly ignored by science for 400 years: ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’, which can be enlarged to this question: ‘why we see everything still, if all what we study in a quantum scale has motion?’ IS the key to unveil the dimensions of the Universe.

The answer given by quantum physics that we shall expand further to all scales is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘particle’ and a ‘wave’’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either, but not both, dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state.

Thus, we apply this duality to the definition dimensions: dimensions are both, an extension of fixed space, perceived as motion or a motion ‘perceived as fixed space’. For example, the ultimate space of the Universe, vacuum, is teaming with energetic motions that appear at a large scale ‘as fixed’ space-distances (quantum vs. relativistic view); Galaxies separate from each other at huge speeds but we see their ‘motion’ as an expansion of space…Thus:

‘A dimension is a motion perceived as still extension or distance’.

Hence dimensions can be generated by motions of particles and reproductions of waves. In the lower scale of string theory we can describe those dimensions as the reproduction of strings. But what matters to us is the vacuum of our scale of space-time; which can be seen as electromagnetic motion at c-speed, since it is filled of light and background radiation, or as vacuum space.

This duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we perceive a car moving also as a fixed line of distance in a night picture, or the duality of stop and go of a film camera, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

It explains the generation of dimensions:

A point with motion creates a line dimension; a line in motion creates a bidimensional plane of information; a plane in motion creates a mass-volume and a volume in motion creates a life-cycle or world-cone – the concept used in Relativity to define the 4th dimension of time.

The reader might notice that those motions become perceived by human senses as a duality of motion-stillness, so the 1st dimension is seen as speed, the second, a plane or sheet of information as the page you are reading as ‘still form’ or information the 3rd, a volume or mass becomes again a stillness, and the 4th a world line, which is substituted by a time cycle, as motion again. Thus again the past, the 4th dimension becomes ‘still’ and the future, the 5th dimension, an uncertain motion.

Indeed, theoretically, prior to Absolute Relativity there were in physics only 3 dimensions of space and one of time.

But under the duality of the Paradox of Galileo, in reality those 3 dimensions of space are also motions. And indeed, it is obvious at quantum scale that ‘space’ is really a bubbling world of electromagnetic energies and particles condensed from those energies.

This also applies to our scale. So if we consider the motion of a gas, volume is proportional to that motion/temperature: PxV=knT. But volume is space; so space grows as motion grows. And it applies to the aforementioned cosmic scale of galaxies moving/creating distances.

Moreover we observe that each ‘bigger dimension’ includes the previous ones. So the line includes the point; the plane, the line; the volume the plane and the world-cone the plane.

Can we extend this growing game of dimensions in motion that create a new dimension? Yes, we can, when we do a proper analysis of what the 4th dimension of time in General Relativity really means – something which as most definitions of physics is far better understood in mathematical terms than in logic, conceptual ones. Indeed, physicists, unaware of the paradox of Galileo still draw higher dimensions as weird spatial drawings, when beyond the 3rd dimension our ‘senses’ spatialize, by creating the stillness of light-space, all other dimensions are perceived as motions in time. Hence there are not ‘weird’ impossible drawings of dimensions beyond the 3rd one of ‘volume’, for reasons that go beyond this introductory lesson on Absolute Relativity.

Physicists spatialize time, in terms of its ‘present’ dimension.

Few physicists understand that time has also 3 dimensions, since they only study ‘simultaneous measures’, mathematically described with derivatives, ∂t, which are an ‘instant of time’; that is, a slice of present in the total flow of the 5th-6th dimensions.

This was further proved by Einstein’s Relativity a theory, which is concerned with the values of ‘simultaneous measures of space-time’, hence with the values of a relative ‘present time’.

This concept of present time derives from Galileo’s measure of speed, V=s/t, ∂s/∂t; hence ∂t=∂s/v. which is the meaning of time in standard physics.

Time is defined then in terms of space and speed (which are according to the paradox of Galileo, similar concepts of fixed space or motion space). Hence physics ‘spatializes time’; and vice versa. In those terms, space is just the perception of present time in simultaneity. Or in words of Einstein:

‘Space is measure from a simultaneous frame of reference’.

Thus physical time, ∂t, only shows a very limited ‘dharma’, or part of the entire flow of time from past (the fifth dimension) to future (the sixth dimension). In physics the fourth dimension is only present time, which is what the Riemannian geometries of Einstein’s and Minkowski’s models of space-time study.

Time though as any child knows before it learns General Relativity, has not only the present time, the spatial ‘dharma’, or slice of the flow of time that ‘freezes’ in the field equations of Einstein. Space is a fixed perception of a time motion.

Thus, all systems must, by the paradox of Galileo, be defined in time and space to achieve a complete description of an event. Then both will be an equivalent perspective on the same event.

TIME MOTION VS. SPATIAL FORM, SPATIAL CONTINUITY VS. TIME DISCONTINUITY.

A true understanding of reality in its fundamental logic principles is missed among huminds because the founders of modern science missed the not-so ‘evident’ visual duality of the Universe between the 3 motions of time (lineal t, iterative hyperbolic ∏, cyclical ð) which form billions of different beings in all scales of reality, and its 3 fixed forms as perceived by its ∞ monads≈ §patial minds, @, which stiffen those motions into forms (lineal distance, $, hyperbolic bidimensional space curvatures, S and cyclical space-information, §).

And the other two logic dualities between lineal, flat, small, open and cyclical, large, closed forms; and small discontinuous and large continuous parts. The 3 dualities we illustrated with the picture of Saturn’s rings also discovered by Galileo ARE all over the place in mathematical physics (i.e. lineal small steps of momentum described by Newtonian 2nd law vs. closed cyclical energy paths in the Hamiltonian/Lagrangian  formalism; ∆-1 quantum discrete eigenvalues in quantum physics vs. continuous differential equations in the other extreme of ∆+1 gravitational relativity, algebraic still ‘Groups’ vs. analytical ‘steps’, matrix’ Heisenberg descriptions vs. wave Schrodinger’s dynamics, etc. etc.). 

It is then all the more surprising that a serious philosophy of dualities and ternary symmetries have never been explored. How is this, has to do with the automaton, mechanical praxis of modern science. In fact, the years I tried to spread among scholars 5D², as the world chair of the science of duality in the milieu of systems sciences, I was receiving questions about the ‘utility’ of this work which simply puzzled me about the nature of the humind, as I live in awe of those symmetries, like the one just explained between simultaneous superorganisms and time worldcycles. And simply concluded that huminds are not much interested in ‘the territory of truth, which is like a path on a cliff, a thin line we fear to walk through’…  as a polish poet concluded. Poetry indeed being the higher Disomorphic form of verbal mirrors.

But it is not the mathematical formalism as mirror of reality truth? It is, but only a single mirror of the poetic disomorphisms of the universe, which are all based in symmetries, dualities and ternary forms.

But, and this is the biggest handicap of mankind, huminds are self-centred and one-dimensional. They want single truths. They abhor polidimensional views, as the Universe abhors vacuum – a meaningless word as all space has motion, and all time has form, and when both do not exist nothing exists.

So the concept of multidimensionality, symmetry, duality and ternary forms puts ill-at-ease most huminds. And yet without exploring the dualities and ternary symmetries of space and time dimensions we cannot start the game of existence we all play.

Of them, the most important trinities is that of co-existing planes in super organisms, the present scale, and then two ‘extra scalar dimensions’, entropy or dissolution, 4D and social evolution into wholes rule by singularity minds, 5D.

Of all this humans understand very little as they are ‘evident beings’ with a hard time looking at time, specially at the future, with its intelligent variation, always focused in the past, with its memorial forms. So we shall repeat the basic notions of reality hoping the human or robotic ‘future’ reader can memorize them.

Now we shall bring a new fundamental law or fundamental symmetry between space and time states, which illuminates its constant interaction.

As we cannot distinguish time from space states, they must appear as ‘pairs’, but as time is always a sequential flow those pairs must appear consecutively, and we shall call that flow of sequential states of which there are only 5  dimensional variations, THE 5 motions of time & space:

t≈t (3D), s≈s (1D), s<t+t>s (2D), ∆-1 s>>∆+1 s (5D), t+1<<t-1 (4D)…

A minimal MOTION in time and/or space, thus becomes the fundamental ‘dynamic flow’ of reality. Let us see then how the Universe moves through ‘repetitive’ or ‘s<≈>t’ feed back variations.

Motion and form, the two elements that combine into energy beings.

This is the fundamental principle of physics, called the principle of relativity:

“We cannot distinguish a motion from a still dimension (form or distance).’ Poincare…

‘as each dimension of space= form is accompanied b a dimension of motion=time, ST≈ST≈ST’.

SO WHAT WE CALL MOTION IS IN FACT A BEAT OF CHANGE, AN S-S, OR T-T, OR S-T OR T-S STEP… in a  constant form-motion, information-entropy, perception-reproduction st-st-st beat; as all motions can be reduced to that constant reproductive beat.

Let us then explore the concept of ðime cycles as carriers of information, and its three arrows and the systems made with them as organic elements, entropic limbs/fields, body-waves and informative particle-heads – its simultaneous perception in §pace – departing from its simplest forms, which are topological bidimensional forms.

So what IS the proper way to make sense of the galilean paradox?

Conceptually the way to go is to accept the stop and go, the dual dimensionality of all systems which are motion and form, momenta, energy, and so we move from Galilean relativity, the single being, to the holographic principle, the mind seeing it as dual motions and forms.

BUT AND THIS IS THE BREAKING INSIGHT, the still view is that of the mind – the motion view that external to our mind. So we must recast the question of relativity:

‘why minds still the motion of the Universe” And how this through relativity, distort our in-taking of information as human beings?

The answer is ontological: to perceive you need a still mind mapping; motion is unfocused, and adds too much information which a small mind cannot fit if it wants to portrait a still , perceivable image of reality.   THUS PARTICLE-HEAD states are informative minds that stop, and wave states move the system.

But why we do see form with the mind, motion when we adopt an external point of view? To understand why we have to understand first the mind.

Because IT IS OBVIOUS THAT WHAT WE SEE AS SPACE IS A MAYA OF THE MIND, WHICH CAN BE MATHEMATIZED, OR TALKED ABOUT OR PICTURED, BUT STILL WILL BE THE ELECTRONIC MIND AND ITS CAPACITY TO PERCEIVE LIGHT IN ‘STOPNESS’ (Constancy of c-speed, which conceptually means simply, we, or rather our ‘electronic minds’ – and the electronic digital minds of atomic computers – SEE LIGHT as stopped in its source, with always the same speed.

The mind is as in that case, since electrons ‘perceive’ waves of light as stopped photons, always present in the way mankind perceives, measures, and so with its electronic instruments.

So let us then consider what the mind is, as it is obvious that there is a feed-back equation going on in reality:

§@ ≈ ∆ ð 

The Universe is made of ‘Motion and Time’, ‘Lineal and Angular momentum’ Motion with form. But motion dominates form. Even if the mind thinks otherwise because of the Galilean Paradox – the duality of stillness and motion, as we perceive the Earth still but it is moving.

Yet this paradox is indeed the proof that form, information dominates motion, because the mind prefers to see still information to blurred motion.

The perception of time and space as a moving cycle or line or a fixed form or distance is obviously an effect of the mind. It is NOT there, it is the mind that stops time cycles and lineal spatial motions.

This must be understood from the beginning, the ultimate reality is motion not form, time moves and space moves. They just move in different shapes. And then minds, lock those motions into a simultaneous, ‘informative’, ‘dimensional’ shape because it sees those motions in ‘slow camera’. The arrival of filming makes this easier to understand. Stillness is just the perception of very fast cyclical motions, as when we see a turning wheel as a fixed form.

So often we see motion as distance – we cannot distinguish motions from dimensions of form (this is the meaning of relativity, the relativity of all motions).

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics.

It manifests in different forms in different scales. Perhaps the most important expression is the duality wave-particle, still ill understood in quantum physics.

We shall consider of its many consequences 2 of them – an objective explanation of the constancy of light speed from relativity and a footnote on its duality in quantum physics.

The physical world is dual  from ‘above’ (the cosmic scale) to ‘below’ (the quantum scale), to quantum discrete motion to go ‘actions’, from the duality of motion vs. still perception or ‘Galilean->Einsteinian relativity’, to the basis of our understanding of science is the finitesimal small vs the finitely large (infinities do not exist in the metrics of the 5th dimension, hence the use of finitesimals and finite, minimal and maximal n-1 quanta and U+1 worlds).

EINSTEIN’S RELATIVITY: adapting discontinuous scalar space-time to continuous single space-time.

Now, the next instalment of the analysis of galilean relativity between motion and stop was einstein’s special relativity and again, he, unaware of the duality of dimensions of motion and form, merely went further into the obsession of measure, translating the effects of ‘warping’ of space that shortens it, when information is imprinted by light in the previous quantum potential of lineal form, adding to the measure a -ct factor of warping. This was special relativity concerned with that translation to our world where we do not see the quantum potential – hence we add the warping to scale up the process into our ‘terse’ space-time.

And further on, we do not see the stop and go of particles and waves, and so we added the lorentz transformations to compensate in our continuous Universe, and in this manner special relativity maintained the fantasy of a continuous derivative motion universe (when it is a stop and go), and a single space-time (when it is a scalar space-time warped in the whole scales).

Motion and form go in pairs, advancing space-time.

The st beatings of the Universe define 4 dimensions immediately of motion, s≈S, T≈t,  S<T, T<S, which are the four fundamental motions of the Universe. BEING THE FIFTH DIMENSION, the no motion of them all in the still pure space-time of the Mind, @.

So departing from 4 motions, we must first consider if an S≈s and a t≈T is motion: it is in the scalar growth OR DIMINUTION. WHILE the stop and Tgo, Stop, Tgo motion and form gives us the other two:

we cannot see motion and form together, the whole and its parts, we confuse lineal detailed view in short space-time intervals with cyclical, larger slower view… such galilean paradoxes are the reflection of Space=time dualities that the mind tries to ‘con-form’ into space-simultaneous view to ‘perceive them’. (Perception being always in space-simultaneity as still form a quanta of space=time).

The Universe is a fractal superorganism of 5 dimensions of space-time, where the fourth dimension of parts and the fifth dimension of wholes create its scalar, organic structure, as it is made of smaller and larger super organisms of space-time.

Those super organisms follow a fundamental logic rule, which started modern science – the realisation that ‘we cannot distinguish motion from form’ (Poncaire, Principle of Galilean relativity) according to which all motions in time can be seen as form-distances in simultaneous space and vice versa.

So we conclude that space-time, what we perceive as motion and form is composed of 5 dimensions of space undistinguishable of its equivalent perceptions as motions of time, hence:

5 D ST = 5 T-motions + 5 S motions (S=t).

This simple equations of the logic behind galilean relativity will suffice to explain all what exists.

As it happens two immediate consequences of the formulae is that being S=T, the maximising function of S x T (S+t being equal to K, in this case 10 dimensions), what the Universe maximises is Sxt+S=t, which given the relationship between space and information and time and entropy we write as exi+s=t, which is the function of existence of the Universe, maximise your function of existence is what all systems, do.

How we do it? Obvioulsy maintaining the balance at S=T. AND SO THE LAW OF BALANCE FOLLOWS, OF ACTION REACTION, OF ETERNAL CONSERVED MOTIONS IN THE UNIVERSE.

The simplicity of the first beats of existence, S=t, s=t, and its s=s, t=t apparent congruencies is only the beginning of an incredible adventure, the motions of reproduction of information across the five dimension of space-time that we call reality.

The first beats of existence.

We start with 2 states: space-form and motion-time. Space is the mind-intelligence, motion the constant original substance the minds try to stop.

The mind tries on the other hand to be also in constant motion, switching perspective not to be bored, so stop and go, but as go is reproduction of form, is really inform and reproduce, and reproduction being st, and inform, @-S.

The maximisation of an s=t balance happens obviously with the maximal number of s=t beats, as s and t become equalised by smaller moments and forms of it, the moving reproducing st>t>st>t ‘actual beat’ is sparkled by explosions of Ss,death.

RECAP.The 5s +5t=10 Disomorphic space-time organisms & the Galilean paradox.

The Galilean paradox simply means there are two realities, as Descartes, founder of modern science, its method and mathematical frame of reference, rightly understood. One the @-mind, which creates the fixed forms of ‘fractal §pace’ we observe (ab. @, §):  §@≈∆ð.

The equation with 5 symbols, each representing one of the dimensions of the Universe of space-time is a conceptual logic deduction of the Galilean Paradox, that expands the concepts of Galilean relativity and Einstein’s relativity to the Absolute relativity of the fractal Universe. So it is worth to detain ourselves in their understanding.

So if we consider space-form and time-motion in its 3 parallel ‘lineal, cyclical and mixed, hyperbolic forms’ we can define 3+3 Ds:

  • @: $, S, §: The perception of time cycles by an space-mind, still, linguistic, mirror of the whole Universe, which ‘seems’ in words of Descartes a devilish virtual form put on the mind. As the mind, @, generates it; we cannot deny this spatial virtual reality, even if it is not the ultimate motion reality. As the mind generates a still=spatial reality, ab. §, we need to describe also space, as generated linguistically by minds in synchronous mappings. We use again different symbols for the different ‘dimensions’ of space: $ for lineal form-distance, S, for the combined wave-forms and § for cyclical and lineal space, which is CAPitalized as present is its dominant element.
  • ∆: t, T, ð: An absolute external Universe, made of scalar dimension, which in each one of them shows 3 varieties of motion, lineal time motion (t), cyclic time motion, ab.ð, and its ‘combinations’ for which we shall use the CAP symbol T, as present is dominant. Where ð cyclical time is measured by frequency, ƒ=1/t, inverse to lineal time s all has in detail motion, and it is structured in ‘scales of space’ (ab. ∑§) or rather ‘planes’ (ab. ∆=∑§).
  • ≈: Operandi that relates them, most often a relative equality. Since  the only way we can make logic sense of it is to consider that the mind view of reality in space is parallel, similar, congruent, equal but NOT identical TO THE OUTSIDE UNIVERSE IN MOTION=TIME, with real obvious fractal scales from minimal forms in space to maximal forms.

The  inverse properties of cyclic time and lineal space.

How can we translate the dualities of line and cycle, motion and form? They are inverse in a logic and geometric way. So we can describe easily the concept of space time inverted properties with a hyperbole. We shall find then that hyperbolic functions, such as e, are fundamental to define the different transformations between space and time:

In the graph a hyperbolic function between a line and a cycle. In general certain cyclical curves follow the relationship between a point of time and a lineal distance of motion.

The Universe is a 5 Dimensional fractal that reproduces vital topologies of time-space, ternary forms of motion and form, which organises into larger, slower scales of fifth dimension of ðime§pace.

Motions on 5D are either topological βidimensional changes (Galileo’s paradox) in D³, or full worldcycles (motions in 5D), and so we must be aware of both.

The main bidimensional motions of a space-time being are motions with form, bidimensional units of:

§, $: Lineal form x Lineal form=plane of space-distance

E, ∃: max. motion x min. form = wave of energy, entropy, expansive motion

ð: min.. motion x max. form= cyclical time, information, harmonic motion

ƒ: max. form x max. form= informative time, implosive motion.

This initial conditions set the combinatorics of topological motions as each of those bidimensional elements combine with other forming ternary, fully-functional, efficient systems, Γ• that can act feed, perceive, move and reproduce and evolve socially, the five actions, of survival of the vital program of any fractal of information of the Universe.

This basic motions then become repetitive in fractal self-similar beings as each compose motion leaves a memorial trace of previous traces that continue being traced in the same place ‘reproducing the facto the being’.

In this manner physical systems grow in form and dimensions:

Thus the CONSTANT AMBIGUITY in normal and scientific discourse, which confuses entropy and energy on one side and form and information. We can’t escape that ambiguity so we often confuse terms entropy and energy and form and information but we will try to BE PRECISE, when writing equations or explaining fundamental facts.

SO WE TRY TO DIFFERENCIATE ENTROPY AND ENERGY, and CALL FORM, in/form/ation, as here the ambiguity is far more entrenched in the normal discourse, so when we highlight form, we use ƒ and in/form/ation.

For example in E=mc²; E is e, entropy not Energy; m is ðime, an inward vortex of gravitational forces (principle of equivalence of acceleration and mass), and the energy is c x c a wave of light ðime§pace, whose hyperbolic form is in fact a combination of the cyclical mass form and the lineal, expansive entropy of the explosion.

For example, in ‘colour codes’ used by minds to differentiate the four terms, blue is the colour of pure form, red the colour of pure entropy, and its combinations are green the reproductive colour of information with more form and yellow, the colour of energy with more motion. And so the brain classifies reality with those two extreme and two intermediate colors, and we shall observe that all mind-languages are combinations of those four elements.

Some languages are simpler, and then we have the two unperceived limits, black of form, white of entropy and combined greys. Words also have:

Form-subject (human) < energetic-informative verb or ‘action’-momentum: e x i > Entropy of subject (object ab=used by the subject).

Since existence is a game of those 2, 3, 4 elements/dimensions of reality. So we define a conceptual acronym, the ‘Function of existence’:

Entropy x form = energy + Information

But in a license of the inherent ambiguity of those terms we write: e x i = st   entropy x Information = ðime§pace Momentum (integrated for a long period as Energy).

To exist is thus to combine entropy-motions and in-form-ation, form,  in a series of actions of existence, pure motions, energy feedings, perception of forms, communication of information, reproduction of both, social evolution with other forms through ‘ties’, which are flows of sharing of those elements…

Do not be scare by the ambiguity of terms, try just to realize the deep connections between them at a topo-logic level of form and function and when you are familiar you will learn to see reality in a much deeper way. To help we shall consider a simplified graphic of the two poles, temporal form and lineal entropy, and its energy-information combinations.

I apologize because I tend to use in-form-ation instead of form, very often as my texts of 30 years of lonely research started with the simplified model of energy and information (as that is what we perceive)

It is important though to be precise when using those terms in equations and detailed descriptions of beings and its events. So the first question is how can we measure those terms? Even if we don’t perceive. Alas! the Universe is wise and has given us ‘parameters to measure’:

PURE §pace can be measure as DISTANCE and size, S. Pure form can be measured by the frequency of the cycles of the form-clock, ƒ, which in turn becomes perceivable externally as ‘density’, ‘inertia’, ‘mass’ and similar terms for each scale.

Once those dualities are understood, we can compare the properties of both, spatial entropy>energy and temporal form< information, observing the inversion of its qualities and yet, in as much as both have the same number of dimensions, energy and information can transform one into the other by transmuting those properties:

Time cycles, Tƒ                    Vs X       Entropic Space, ΣEs            ≈ST-momentum-actions- energetic information

Time-clocks: O-form           Vs.        Space motion: Lineal        ≈ waves

Small, still                             Vs.       Large,  moving fast      ≈   Open curves

Tall, Perpendicular                     Vs.             Long, Parallel   ≈  wide, intersecting

Hierarchical  Order                           Vs.           Democratic chaos-freedom

Bidimensional Height                Vs.            Bidimensional Length  ≈ tri-dimensional entity

Cyclical, Rotation, imploding     Vs.            Lineal, uncoiling, exploding   = beating rhythm

Informative Frequency         Vs.             Lineal Speed                        = momentum

Broken  form                           Vs.               Continuous, differentiable

Intelligent, perceptive             Vs.                   Strong, fast.   =        energetic top predator

Social, organic, creative              Vs.           Darwinian, destructive behaviour   =

Future, logic path              Vs.            Past, trailing motion

Life arrow                                Vs.                      Death arrow.     = existential world cycle

Waves of §pace                      Vs.                     Particles of Time

Female, yin principle             Vs.               Male, yang principle   = reproduced child

Masses, charges                  Vs.                       Forces, fields       = energy

Heads  & senses                     Vs.                    Limbs               =  Bodies.

The formal=functional differences between entropy and information (organs) is a duality – the ‘Black hole Law’:

Limbs/fields of Maximal Space=Entropy x  Min. Form Vs.Max. speed of Information=Minimal Spatial extension= heads & particles

For example, as the chip becomes smaller halving its size every 2 years it doubles its capacity to process information (‘Moore’s Law) The reason is obvious: to think, to calculate you have to communicate in-form-ation, forms between elements of any informative system. The smaller the brain, the faster communication takes place within that brain and the faster it calculates and processes information in a logic manner.

If we consider that each being can be in a time or state of space, the question now is. What defines then its state?

In mathematical terms the answer is its curvature, its form, FORM becomes then the definitive element of being, as you cannot change so fast from cyclical to lineal form and viceversa, as you can between state of form and state of motion.

Cyclical time and the world cycles of existence of beings, made of a sum of ‘actions’, which become ‘arrows of time’ (spatial entropy, temporal form and its e x i =st combinations) which are ordered in sequential world cycles of time, which gives us the sensation of a cyclical time program of past to future, which we can also see as a sum of synchronous minds in which ‘knots’ of timespace actions converge, through several co-existing scales.

TRINITY:

PLANES & SPACE-TIME SYMMETRIES 

  

Trinity is the name of the game, which is natural to the fact that causality exists, and so there is always an up and down scale in the fifth dimension, a left-right, back-forward element in a system, and a past-future. What we have unveiled further is the symmetries between those three ∆-s-t components, and the capacity of linguistic minds to put it all into still ‘continuous image’ as a whole. 

TRINITY GENERATES REALITY

3 numbers could resume it all, 1,0 and ∞. Amazingly as it seems they can be seen as the ternary sides of the same structure, 0,the center, |-the membrane, ∞, the internal cycles between both that mirror the infinite Universe.

Thus infinity only reaches till the limits of its Whole:

The |-membrane,  the • singularity & the ∞ cycles between them form an island universe, a fractal superorganism and its world cycles.

The study of the interaction of those 3 elements that compose all §upœrganisms is thus an essential part of GST, which can be inscribed in an even larger concept: the ternary, Universal grammar of all systems, and its fractal ternary sub-divisions ad infinitum.

So in this blog and related ones, we shall deal with ‘TRINITY’ (-;

screen-shot-2017-01-08-at-09-37-22screen-shot-2017-01-08-at-00-22-33In the graph, trinity is the structure of reality, its Universal Grammar, scalar, ST variations and ultimately all what we care to study from the most sacred to the most mundane:

-Trinity is the mystery of christianity, where the ∆+1 Γ•∆, OR subconscious collective of mankind (Jung) communicates its laws of ethic survival which express the fifth dimension of eusocial love, in human verbal languages, through its ‘nervous, informative system’, the language of the wor(l)d through its prophet≈scientist of history, where ‘the word, our God, becomes man and inhabit among us’, as the ‘canon’, or ideal form of the game of existence that humans should imitate to form with its revelation books and memes, a collective ‘DNA’, which brings together all its cellular citizens, supporting that collective mind God, who foresees the future of eusocial evolution; which if humans obey, will help them to evolve and survive from species into super organism, but if not, will bring them likely its collective death through hate-memes and weapons, the ‘bad fruits of the tree of science’.

So the prophet, who foresees the future logically (though a physical interpretation will mean, as information can jump a quantum cycle into the smaller ∆-1 past, which co-exist with the future whole, that actually the future death of a cultural God co-exist with the past life of the cells that host it),  spells those laws to its quantum cells back to the past a generation. THUS the entropic death of God into the language, ∆+1<<∆-1, imprints with the genetic memes of the super organism of history the mind of the prophet, a biological generation 72 ages, exactly the moment of death of Yhwh when 1/3rd of its believers died in the roman holocaust, the month of Ab, 72 years in ‘lineal time’ latter, in the same moment in co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, of the birth of Jesus . Alas, GSTheology is born and we have proved the most debated questions of Christianity – the mistery of trinity, the proof that Jesus is Son of Yhwh, the god-mind of the jewish people, and that he is a prophet  (: hem… ‘believe it or not’.

But trinity is also the cutlery ternary division and its Gst equation: ‘|-Spe (knife) < Ø-ST-fork > O-Tiƒ (spoon); as the knife delivers entropy the food, the spoon acts as the spherical membrane that surrounds it and the ‘last to come’ and more complex fork, with one of the 2 ‘hyperbolic geometries’ of space-time (fractal branching), which performs the functions of the other 2 (perpendicular holding and lateral cutting). We deal with trinity in depth in this post, its sub posts on Æ,  Universal grammar and those ‘attached’ to the Fractal generator.

Just two examples that show you the power of the GST formalism, which besides the usual questions about mathematical physics, will be explaining such seemingly ascientific questions as religious mysticism and table etiquete (: As a TRUE T.Œ, HAS INDEED TO EXPLAIN IN AN EFFICIENT UNIVERSE, all what exists, including good and EVIL≈ANTI-LIVE≈DEATH. And all the arts of the human mind:

Why I am so positive about GST laws? Obviously because of the experimental method, and its FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF TRUTH, which we can resume in a sentence:

‘A theory which is simpler (Occam’s razor) and explains more things with less elements (efficient Universe) is more truth’.

SO FAR NO MODEL OF REALITY CAN MATCH GST on both grounds, as it explains it all WITH ONLY 2 elements, space and time (in fact inverse formal motions, hence ultimately with one element, ‘temporal energy’). Not a single human theory has been able even remotely to explain scientifically the 4 biggest realms of human thought, science, art, religion and the machine…

The fundamental particle of the Universe is a ±∆ super organism, which extends within the U±∞ scales of reality in 3 of such scales, which co-exist tightly related to each other to form a super organism of space-time ‘Œ±1 points’.

∆± ∞, this is the potential of the game and Œ,Æ, i-logic mathematics the language that shows all those potentials as a mere logic shape of information, a still mapping of the Universal game.

But in most cases the system is just 1±∆, a super organism. This is the logic game the Universe plays, the construction of Universals from infinitesimals. Then all the other games are details of this one. Thus we should consider the queen of all sciences biology, and the fundamental particle of the Universe once we have all the information about a region’s domain of vital space and cyclical times, the super organism.

It is a good moment to reflect on what all this means for the scientific understanding of the arrow of time and the nature of the Universe at large.

‘The 5th dimension is scalar, Time is asymmetric, informative; space is symmetric, entropic – with those 3 elements and its fractal parts and combinations, the Universe creates itselF.

A fractal, isomorphic organico-mathematical universe is a proposition quite different from the standard comfort zone of anthropomorphic science. It means we are in a living, organic universe where our importance is absolutely relative, and our dumbness born of the limited view of each point of view of this living universe.

image002

In the graph, the 3 5D Space-time elements that structure all physical/biological/social systems of the Universe:

  • Τhe 3 only topological forms≈functions of Nature, lineal, energetic fields/limbs/territories of space; hyperbolic waves/bodies/reproductive space-times and cyclical, informative particles/heads/languages, which create  in space all ternary fractal organisms of reality:

|-Spe (limbs/fields/territories) < Ø-St (wave-body-reproductive class) > Τiƒ (particle-head-ruling class)

As topologies are form in motion, we can see those 3 topologies synchronically in space and they form a ternary organic structure, or we can see them in actions throughout time:

  • Τhen those systems enact a series of actions of absorption, emission and reproduction of energy and information (±∆e, exi, i), which develop in time in 2 phases, a long period of increasing information with 3 ages (youth: Max. e, reproductive age, Max. e x I , old age, Max. I) followed by a short period of erasing information or death, such as both become a zero sum:

Life arrow of information (E>I) + death, big-bang arrow (I < E) = 0. Whereas > is an informative, implosive motion and < an energetic, entropic one. So we can write the fractal generator in time

Spe (youth) > St (reproductive age) > Τiƒ (old age) << Death-big bang: Spe

So the interaction of the topologies of information and energy and its combination define a Universe made of fractal beings of space-time, which complete world cycles of existence, across all the scales of the Universe.

It is the 3rd element needed for an organic description of reality, as all those systems, will not only have 3 organic topologies in space and 3 ages in its world cycle, but will be organised through 3 scales of relative size that co-exist as parts of bigger wholes:

∆-1 (atomic, cellular, memetic scale) > ∆ (thermodynamic, organic, individual scale) >∆+1 (gravitational, ecosystemic, social)

We can see in the graph, above, some assembly of ternary systems made with the 3 topologies of the Universe, and below the scientific scale of spatial sizes and time clocks, which compose the different space-time beings of the Universe.

SPACE BECOMES FRACTAL BY REPRODUCTION OF PRESENT BODY-WAVES-WORKING CASTES, of the ternary topology of the Universe, Space = Max. E x I, a 5dimensional fractal reproductive space with 3 motions upwards, downwards in scales or with a present simultaneous speed, in present-past-present waves of simultaneous motion, networking in information, non local at distance, as the wave of form, of information, reproduces through a fertile space of energy, the being becomes and as it becomes emerges, fetal entity of a perfect supeorganism, the wave of motions who resembles organic livings living and dying travelling through the scales o the 5th dimension.

We can see the different scales of the Universe all of them including humans, below, described with those 3 elements , ∆SΤ, and its sets of 3×3 + œ laws – to notice that the minimal and maximal scales, both theoretically (cyclical-lineal nanoscopic and macroscopic scales, and atoms and galaxies) have very similar parameters;hence the hypothesis of a scalar Universe of infinite, ∆±∞ scales.

Below we see a human being and its 3 topological digestive-energetic, reproductive-hormonal and nervous/informative systems, which sub-divide in 3 more systems, for a total of 3×3+0 sub-systems which are used in medicine to describe completely the human being; whereas the 0-integrative whole system is the brain, itself a ‘fractal point’ of the next ∆+1 social, memetic scale of mankind. In the left we see the 3 ages of human beings, between conception in the ∆-1 seminal scale and death back to the flat energy world of disconnected cells.

As such we shall be able to describe existence, as a travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension.

Τhe beauty, precision and essential homologic poetry of the fractal, organic, self-reproductive, scalar, absolutely relative, infinite, immortal Universe we shall describe with the formalism of 5D Space-time systems, is a new door to our communion with the whole Universe of which are all a mere part, made to its image and likeness.

Networks of simultaneity and resonance (informative axons): consciousness and emergence.

All this said there are elements in the Universe which are difficult to understand in terms of ‘classic’ human thought and science, which are at the heart of the processes of ‘existence’, and emergence of information in upper scales, and organisation of parts into wholes. They deal with the fact that ‘Tiƒ’ particles-heads-upper informative classes must be fully connected with its lower ∆-1 scale to synchronise, make it work together as a whole, resonate its orders in all lower systems and finally be conscious of a whole – and the key to all those processes are fractal branching networks, which unlike herds loosely connected in a single plane, conned the upper scale of a being with all its lower parts/regions.

It must be understood that those networks have many levels of connection between scales. They are though basically always the same. Informative networks break information in reproductive waves through axons and so they can produce informative actions of multiplication of information both ways through effects of simultaneity and resonance.

screen-shot-2016-12-29-at-09-29-36

screen-shot-2016-12-01-at-20-27-41screen-shot-2016-12-29-at-09-27-31

The resonance of all resonances, one can consider an imaginary space of dimensions of time – the 3 first dimensions those of a space of lesser form on which we transit – in our case the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space – all other dimensions becoming dimensions of scalar growth of information, through resonances between the larger and the smaller scales with self-similar forms, merely differentiated by its TIME metric:

Max. Spe   = Min. tiƒ, the larger resonance encodes the smaller one.

How whole minds imprint smaller parts, through the simultaneous fractal network division of an impulse of maximal energy into multiple quantum’s of information. Such as E = h v, is proportional to the information the system emits (v) along an ‘H’, constant of space-time, or ‘lower field’ (S=t), from where the E(e) x V(i) body of ∆+1 extracts its energy of motion.

On the other hand, parallel networks of energy ,pipes and blood flow are less concerned with the form but with the energy it provides to the motion of its cells, and are based in adjacency and other topological, spatial properties.

The devil though is in the details, so once we understand this general picture of the whole, its parts and its common time world cycles, sum of all the frequencies of its space-time actions, which construct a super organism that will go through 3 ages between birth and extinction, as it carries as a whole its 3 ∆±1 scale of beings, we shall realise we just have explained they very surface of a extremely intelligent and complex world in which almost magically, all works together because of the complementary connections between simultaneous parts in space and synchronous rhythms in time and ‘resonant’ effects in scales.

So 4 ‘magic phenomena’ will be of enormous importance to fully grasp how ∆, S and T, dynamically organise (or inversely become disorganised):

  • Space Simultaneity, which is an a priori condition for a vital organic space to exist, and act efficiently as a whole.
  • Time Synchronicity, which is an a priori condition for a temporal ensemble of parts to exist, and act as a shoe.
  • ∆-Scale Resonance, which is the a priori condition for ‘parts and wholes’ to interact together.
  • Consciousness, which is an a posteriori condition of complexity in a panpsychic Universe: consciousness arises within any sufficiently complex, information-processing system. All animals, from humans on down to earthworms, are conscious; even the internet could be. That’s just the way the universe works.

TRINITY – THE ¬A LOGIC OF GST

The few scholars i have been able to lure into this web (: are taken aback by the sheer size of its posts, its excessive disorder :(my fault), its polymath structure and complex ‘syntax’, that is logic formalism (the fault of the Universe:)

i am trying to improve my faults, but I am not of the opinion of my predecessor in the illustrious series of humind infinitesimals that in the modern age have evolved our paradigm of time-space … Descartes>Galileo> Newton>Leibniz>Darwin>Marx>Planck> Einstein>i-man (my old pseudonym, back in the 90s when at Columbia U. I used to self-publish books and send it around the globe)…

‘If General relativity is wrong, God should correct the Universe, so beautiful it is’. Well God is correcting… relativity, into Absolute relativity and who knows what else he would correct>improve in the future. So far this is the deepest view of his thoughts, as ‘the seer of time’ (Saint Augustine) And so we need to correct our humind mirror, maths and logic; maths by correcting geometry adapting it to fractal space, logic by introducing the ESSENTIAL CONCEPT OF ALL LANGUAGES WHICH OBSERVE REALITY, THE TERNARY SYMMETRIES BETWEEN THE MIND LANGUAGES AN THE S-T-∆ elements of reality.

In essence the key changes are the concept of an Euclidean point, which now becomes a non-euclidean fractal point that has breath as it has a vital inner space of energy, enclosed by a membrane or cyclical time-clock, focused into an informative still singularity or mind. So all points are fractal ternary points.

And for that reason, the logic of the Universe IS TRINITY, the study of its three parts in space, three ages in time, three scales in ∆; and the symmetries, mirror reflections and interactions between those 3 x 3+0 dimensions of reality; as the Universe is really in a visual simile, like a kaleidoscope, with four mirrors, the mind, the scales, the time ages and the spatial topologies communicating with each other and creating relationships between them.

Now, while the mind can be studied by its own linguistic elements it is often placed in the head-particle, Tiƒ, so for sake of simplification we accept except for detailed analysis and epistemological philosophy its ‘equality’ with the Tif element of its spatial topology. So in general we eliminate the mind of our analysis (given also the difficulties to be accepted by anthropocentric humans). 

It is then when trinity can be resumed in a generator equation: ∆-1 Past Sp (limbs/fields) < ∆ Present TS BODY-WAVES> ∆+1 future Tƒ particle-heads.

And this Generator equation is the basic formal definition of each species (naming its parts), whose formal study gives birth to NON-Æ=I-LOGIC SCIENCE (i for information and next letter to a and e).

The use of the generator helps a lot to make simpler as Feynman diagrams did in quantum physics the complex symmetries, similarities, reflections of time ages into space topologies into scales and so on. I.e. we just change the reverse order of the generator and it becomes a time symmetry: Ps (past) < ST (PRESENT) > ft (future). We reverse the symbols of > into < and information becomes entropy, and so on.

So the symbolism of ® is very useful to define all kind of events between the 3+0 elements or reality.

So trinity is a complex logic, but the simplex way to deal with it is the ternary principle, basis of our division of those four forms into 12 more detailed isomorphic elements to study in depth each species and its properties; which we can resume in many ways. Some are:

  • ‘Every element of reality can be subdivided into three ∆ST sub-elements diminishing in ∆§cales and viceversa, every three elements of reality with enough complementarity to create a larger whole can be assembled into an ∆§+1 system’.

i.e. your leg has a Tiƒ ankle joined to the feet, a middle and and upper part; your fingers in palingenesis broke first from 1 to three and then the lateral ones into 2 to make five, which are the different type of fingers of all animals.

  • DUAL s-t and trinity s-st-t evolutions in time establish then the creative processes of the Universe. In languages from one a-languages we went into three vowels and five and then seven…. Complexity grows by subtle differentiations on the trinity principle.
  • THE TRINITY principle in kaleidoscopic terms means also: every phenomena in space, time or ∆-scale has A REFLECTION in the other two elements. Ie the three parts of space have three dominant ages in time, limbs in youth, heads in old age, bodies in the middle age, and relate closer to an ∆±1 scale: limbs to the ∆-i fields of entropy it absorbs, ∆º to the organic plane the body ‘mates to reproduce’; tiƒ, to the ∆+i worlds in which it performs larger cycles as part of a larger whole.

And finally as trinity means indeed reflections into t-s-st, ∆º±1 scales, topologies an ages, we talk of multi functionality:

  • Every system of reality to exist efficiently is able to develop three relative functions in its whole as entropic, informative and reproductive partial part.

Besides trinity there are then lower duality principles of logic of which two are important:

  • Entropy and information are inverse functions.
  • Species subdivide in gender states, wave-female states, s>S=t<t and male, particle-field state: S>T+T<S.
  • The ‘postulate of existence’ which requires at least two poles of entropy and information in a dynamic event for an entity to exist. Since without software and hardware, entry and information, without a dynamic flow/motion, the seed of information is latent, the vacuum space has no form. It is then the fusion of both, and its intermediate growth of a body-wave of communication, which introduces into present existence a being, and for that to happen there shall be a certain similarity between software and hardware; slowly comming together through its communication.

In the graph, the syntax of all languages can be reduced to dual and ternary structures that reflect the ternary elements of the fractal generator, Spe<St>Tiƒ. Thus we can consider all languages mirrors of the generator, which in turn species use to order and project its imagination’, reproducing those mirrors through those languages into actions that mold the future of reality. Mind stiences therefore are essential to the way the Universe creates. The graph shows how a minimum of two parameters to represent entropy and information can create a mapping of reality, even though ternary languages are more precise. In the right the human verbal, temporal language and mathematical, spatial one, can be reduced to ternary dimensions (height-information, width-reproduction, length-entropy), ternary topologies, ternary symbols G(spe) <action operandi>T(ƒ) and ternary sentences. Above a simple mathematical statement that relates a spatial function, D, and a temporal one, written BOTH in cyclical 1/ƒ=T and lineal time, below a scheme of the Universal grammar of all systems made of Names (informative element), verbs (actions) and Objects (energy of the Name). Both suffice for a whole mapping of reality.

So let us go part by part. We first upgraded your mind to black and white and then to the three colours/arrows your mind uses to view reality.

Now we shall enter into the territory you don’t see – the mind itself, behind those languages that simplify reality into information.

So we need only a final element, the mirror mind of information or central singularity that apperceives it all.

As those three time arrows in each instant cannot be seen, systems become mirrors that visualise the motions of time in simultaneous measures of space, a mind can conceive a linguistic mapping/mirror of those three topological motions and see how through time they develop structures synchronised as ‘space-time organisms’.

The Universe is a fractal of 3 timespace arrows, entropy, energy and information. This simple elements in its infinite variations and combinations defines the Universe, with a logic and mathematical that present science lacks, despite its awesome achievements in terms of mathematical description and praxis of manipulation of reality.

Philosophy of science though is not so much concerned with the capacity to manipulate reality with precise measures and a posteriori accounting of all process as ‘patterns’ that will repeat in the future and can be manipulated. But with the reasons and whys of those processes, which are considered to be ‘rational’,  ‘selfish’ and ‘biological’; that is, systems act to survive, and they do so from their central point of view or singularity-mind of information, by controlling and ordering a territory around them, enclosed by a cyclical time-like membrane.

And so the 3 functions-forms of time-space, ‘spatial lineal entropy’, ‘repetitive energy’ and ‘informative cyclical dimensional form’ combine together to create ‘entities’ which are the essential ‘particle of reality’, not some arid physical parameter, but an organic structure of scalar space-time, the supœrganism (Ab. œ, following the rule of slightly change terms in english to serve the new paradigm). 

Thus we can rephrase our definition: ‘the Universe is a supœrganism, made of 3 timespace functions/forms, assembled into ternary physiological networks, that process spatial=motion, informative dimensional form and its iterative combinations, in order to survive as a balanced structure’.

It is then time to connect this seemingly new view of reality with the tradition of philosophy of sciences, as philosophers have always understood it.

Culture over science.

Now, all this clear a big question hauls over our understanding of the Universe. Why mankind has been unable to describe scientifically its three arrows of time and only ‘admits’ entropy; even if in earlier time of history, Asian cultures with its duality visnu-shiva and yin-yang, equivalent to the duality information-entropy, were so closely to make sense of all of it?

The answer will surprise the reader, who mistakingly believes today as it believed in the past, that ‘science is truth per se’ and proved with no errors or cultural attachments – as people though religion was proved by dogma. Here the element missed in his discourse is ‘cultural bias’ in science and ‘postulates without proof’, ‘ceteris paribus analysis’, ‘anthropocentrism’, ‘power’ and ‘hyperbole’… all concepts natural to the human psyche a priori of any scientific statement.

In that sense entropy only theories are indeed a bias of the military, power-profession of physicists making weapons and motion machines, and it has always been so, becoming dogma. Entropy was discovered in the study of steam machine motion, as a product of gaseous heat; which is ONLY one of the three states of matter:

Gas (entropy state) < liquid (balanced state) > Crystal-solids (information state).

So it is obvious that the laws of kinetic gases are entropic but it is absurd to expand them to the whole of Nature, by simply ‘eliminating’ from philosophical analysis the other two arrows. And the same happened when in an astounding ‘hyperbole’ Helmothz from the ‘military culture of Germany’, expanded it to the Universe, affirming it was dying and further more, Gamow, a Nuclear-weapons maker affirmed the Universe was always and only a ‘gas-like expansive state’, again reducing the three arrows of the Universe; so well resumed in Einstein’s awesome equation: E=CCM, which he inferred in fact from the inverse arrow of informative, accelerated vortices of mass information, in his landmark: can mass be created out of entropy? So in this formula we have again the three arrows: 

Entropic expanding intergalactic space E< c²≈st  constant wave of light space-time > M Imploding masses and charges (galaxies)

And yet again, physicists and western cultures just used it to make entropic bombs and declare the Universe had only a similar big-bang exploding arrow.

There is here the side of dogma, and repetition and the believers memorial nature of the human mnd. As 1/2 of mankind believe that a  bronze age donkey-breeder tribe who saw a bush burning, understood the meaning of the Universe (Abrahamic religions) and react offended to any attempt to ‘reasoning’ historically this hallucination, just because the word ‘god’ is sacred; 1/2 of them believe the Universe is in a permanent state of entropy, dismissing the other so evident, experimentally, arrows of time, proper of all the generator equations of all systems of nature.

There is nothing though you can do to change a ‘believer’s mind’. In religion is called dogma, in science ‘first postulates’, which always show on the long term to be partial, ceteris paribus, analysis of the whole ternary reality. So for example, euclidean flat space turned out to be one of the three possible geometries of reality, because it was a postulate.

And an entropic Universe shows to be both in space and time one of the three parts of it. So in EFE (Einstein’s equations) the three solutions, steady state, big bang and big crunch are the equivalent processes in time to the three parts in space, and we will see that beautiful time-space symmetry soon).

In that sense, we can say that the entropic postulate of a single arrow of time is a product of the white western male war oriented culture and its manifest destiny, throughout the whole history of the western world, opposed to the dualist and ternary cultures of the west. So we can now introduce a historic view of those cultures, because its postulates today pass as science, and are by no means scientifically proved by experimental evidence, which shows a ternary Universe always.

So we shall use exactly what we have proved – the ternary only topologies of the Universe and its three space-dimensions/time functions, to the racial make-up of mankind, since as it happens is the origin of a new of the many sub-sciences derived of gst that studies…

The three cultures of the mind.

WHAT IS MANKIND? The answers of philosophy of science, the only ones that should be accepted  by a rational enlightened mind of the III millennium, beyond myths and selfish ego-trips is obvious: a single species, as we all can mate with each other, divided into three  races of the mind, the dolichocephalic white  visual people, lineal entropic with its longitudinal axis larger and dominant, likely by influence of the European Neanderthal of larger eyes, visual brains, consonantal sounds, red hair and hooked nose; which has in consequence developed lineal culture, mostly based in lineal agglutinative languages, as German and Arab are, the original language of its most extended groups ,  has fallen in love with lineal weapons that deliver entropy motion and death, and has consequently imposed by force its culture based in the bad fruits of the tree of metal, since the age of bronze, its imperial, hierarchical concept of concepts of lineal time in science, and a lineal manifest destiny in culture, above the two other races of the mind.

In the opposite side of the three dimensional topologies of the Universe, there is the mongoloid race, whose wide word axis between the ears through the Brocca region of temporal verbs, more developed make their cultures dominant in the social language of man, words, with a full understanding of the cyclical nature of all time clocks, which as any kindergarten child knows has more dimensions of form, more information than the simplest, fast moving line.

Hence it developed a more complex, cyclical culture of information, where the creative cycles of nature and the curves of female, yin, Vishnu, women were preferred over the lineal body-mind of the military, entropic, destructive white macho male. Communal social evolution was preferred, conflict avoided and so the Asian cultures with less metal-weapons and tribal warfare survived in larger numbers, the only true measure oaf success in evolution and still today represent the majority of mankind. But when they were discovered by the lineal, entropic white male, soon were submitted by raw power, massacred in huge numbers, and adopted the lineal culture and obsession for the false glare of metal, gold and iron weapons of the west. THE PARADIGM of that conversion being Japan, which copycatted the Germanic cultures and the cruelty and manifest destiny of war and machine-making that have characterized the western world.

But as we said there are three dimensions and topologies which structure the form of all bodies and brains, which in the human case, is the only organ that truly matters; as we are after all at least in paper the Homo Species.

So the third space-time topology in the Universe, mixture of lineal visual entropy of fast motions and destructive power, Shiva or yang in the oriental philosophies, and the cyclical informative arrow of temporal words and social gathering in circles and get together are not the whole tale.

We still have a third axis, that of height, which the racist anthropologist all of them white macho male of the western colonial imperial enslaving cultures didn’t even account for in his classifications, so we will have to invent a new word, psylocephalic people. They are thus dominant in the height axis of the brain, site of the inner soul, the emotional and motor elements, in close connection with the body. It is the black culture, with its rich emotional development, physical powerness and love for nature, Gaia, who have preserved the wild animal life of the planet. Because children are also dominant in the emotional, physical brain, it has been often said that the black people and their cultures, are less powerful than the white, military men who came to dominate and slave them with the fetish tool metal, but again biology tells us that childhood is the happiest of all the states of being; and in all ternary systems constructed with the three topologies of space-time, the body-wave sustains the particle-head of the system, and both are complementary to each other; none is better, they both need each other.

If any of the three elements with whom all systems of nature are constructed, one is the less complex, in fact is the gaseous, entropic, lineal, limbs and fields over which body-waves, guided by particle-heads run.

Indeed, if we extend the topological analysis, to the whole organism of a human being, the entropic limbs, reproductive bodies and informative heads are ALL needed, all are complementary, but if you were to loose a part, a lizard will cut-off his tail, and you rather loose a leg than your body or your head.

So alas, what topological biology tells us, is exactly the opposite of what the supremacist white, lineal military cultures has been claiming for millennia, entropy, big bang weapons and war the leit motif of the white culture and its philosophies of the Universe, are completely disposable. And we cold live perfectly as a species without them. But ethic Languages of social love that enlighten the mind, Nature that sustains our body and children which bring happiness and renew are future are not.

So the next question the philosopher of science should wonder about history is why then the white, male entropic lineal simplex culture has come to dominate all the aspects of our world, from science to culture, from territorial power to the authorized version of history, as it comes in the books of social science. What went wrong with mankind to be guided by entropy, not by life information, by the wrong arrow of time; giving supremacy to the simplest view of the Universe and its death culture?

And the answer is clear: the entropic white man discovered a harder attachment to its teeth and hands, metal-weapons; and so the natural balance between the three races of the mind, and its complementarity was broken, suddenly by a boost of power on the side of entropy.

So we should give the entire mindset of the entropic culture of physics a turnaround showing that even its concept of a Universe of worldlines of motion, as the only ‘arrow of time’ IS IN FACT yet another manifestation of the reproductive nature of the fractal Universe, solving the never quite understood Zeno paradox on the ultimate nature of motion as reproduction of form.

Now the application of the ternary principle to the study of medicine, physiology, the mind, cultures and brain structures is so rich in meanings it could take an entire book in itself. The symmetry between space regions and ages is the most amazing.

A simple example will suffice. The upper brain has three regions, in topological structures: the cerebellum, whose role is to control ‘entropic motions’ and as such is the FIRST developed in the child, with maximal youth activity; the middle brain, which is the emotional brain; and as such is the second in development – the present state, the larger one; and the third region, the frontal, cognitive, maximal Informative region, and as such is the third to be developed. The Dunedin study famous from following 1000 people through life noticed criminal, entropic people develop faster and maximal the cerebellum (properly advised become also better athletes).

In that regard, while this web might seem too abstract for the skeptic scientist, as I focus on GST theory its connections with details of each species is what causes on my mind (cognitive:) a constant orgasm for 30 years, as I read often Nature, SciAm and some specialised scientific magazines – I have not written down more than a fraction of it all, but as Descartes put it, ‘I have left most of it for future researchers to have something to do’ 🙂

i-logic, TERNARY TIME: WHOLES:  3 PARTS & 3 X3+0 DIMENSIONS

Our interest, in a Universe in which there are constantly 3 choices of paths, S, T or ST to act or no to act (-1 action), with equal probabilities. is to map out a new existential algebra (ab. Æ) of all nature systems, with those 3 -1 possibilities.

Why the Universe has 3 positive ternary actions (and a negative, passive no-action) is self evident:

-1: The mind might merely observe and stops motion (•),.

+3: Yet the system might evolve towards higher entropy (+Spe), higher information (+Tiƒ) or might reproduce its space-time in repetitive cycles, which on the long term will become a larger ‘whole’ (∆).

So the existence of 4 elements, ∆•ST, 3 of increasing motion along the 3 paths of space-time (S, st, ∆st) and one of growing stillness (•), implies a more complex logic with 4 potential actions for each bifurcation of past-present into the future.

Of course, if we were to study a ‘fresh beginning’, the probabilities of those futures would be the same. But as the Universe is a game of memorial, informative motions, it follow that as the game proceeds, the future paths become determined by the long cyclical causality of individual actions and past cycles to be completed into the future.

screen-shot-2017-01-08-at-00-22-33So while paths do have a possibility to be modified without expenditure of energy, closed time cycles impose their ‘inertia’ and so the perfect potential ‘fourks’ of space-time (four point forks). The image is meaningful: as always we have a ‘lineal, entropic knife’; an informative, cyclical ‘spoon’ and an ∆•ST, 4-dimensional fork to both cut and  form the food in present space-time. And you would choose, if given a single pick, the fork precisely because it can cut laterally and it can scoop the food. Everywhere the rules of GST will enlighten ‘why things are as they are’; and the causes of the past or the fourkations of the future will be ternary±1.

The causal ‘bifurcations of timespace’ thus are now ‘fourkations’ of space-time. And so the extraordinary one-dimensionality of human minds and its languages are out of meaning. Those arduous arguments between wannabe geniuses sponsoring their ‘point of single view’ as the real cause must cease. Ceteris paribus is simplification. For a being to exist, for a cause to act, for an event to happen in fact it will be because 3 past causes have converged to form a whole time-space ternary symmetry. Think of your actions, when you move, the mind first ‘thinks’ in the motion; the body then provides the energy; the limbs convert it into entropy. It would seem there is only one cause to action, the motion of the legs, but actually 3 actions converged in a ‘dharma of time-space’ to make it happen. Yet for the non-action only the mind is needed to stop action; which therefore is an ‘easier path’.

So the languages we use to portray that process are naturally different from the classic ones. And unlike analysis so close to the social scales of GST and fractals & topology, essentially ‘the’ spatial science of the fractal Universe, algebra as it is understood today, is basically a synoptic way to deal with topological and analytical theorems. And its proper structures, sets and groups must be understood as expressions of our social groups and ITERATIVE, MOVING laws, based in symmetries, transformations and motions through ‘polynomial scales’. But as the language is so different, we rather start afresh and include as we go along the main field worthy of classic algebra, which is NOT sets but group theory.

Temporal, Æxistential Algebra, studies the organisation of systems, through time=change; that is by means of transformations that provoke motions of a system, and create variations of systems, according to Group theory. Still it is worth to remember the basic elements of Algebra and its equivalence.

The ternary operandi of Æ… and its symmetry with ∆ST elements.

Actions and its causes are thus the ultimate inquire of existential algebra. Why and how motions of space-time happen. And what is the formal way to define them?

What we are interested here, beyond explaining the laws of classic algebra, such as group theory, with so many practical cases in science, which translate the TSymmetries and motions through ∆-scales, is the nature of existential algebra and the different equations of motions and species creations, through those motions and actions, which always render a certain ‘syntax’:

Past ‘Operandi’ Future= present.

The operandi between past and future, entropy and information, thus define what kind of present space-time event or entity appear to us. Because we have 4 elements to define existence, operandi are many, not only a simple ± symbol to ad or rest the same type of beings or motions, as when physicists study only locomotions and reduce all to a Hamiltonian ± operandi between the two O-potential and |-kinetic ‘states’ of form-entropy.

So each motion of time will have a different ‘algebraic operandi’, departing from our initial ‘Universal Grammar’.

We shall consider in this introduction the main operandi of the 7 motions of the Universe of which the 3 more important are:

Locomotion: Hamiltonian (Entropic, kinetic Past motion ± Future, Potential motion = Present (superposition motion of waves).

Reproduction: Past (field)  x Future (information)  = Present (iteration)

And the rule is simple, from classic algebra: a superposition or sum is of the same ‘species’; hence ‘energies (time-like)’ or ‘momentums’ (space-like), etc.

A Product can however combine different species. So it is normally a motion, which involves a space and time-like parameters:

Reproduction mixes the Spe and Tiƒ, different ‘genders’.

Finally, the 3rd mode of algebraic equations, polynomials/logarithms, correspond to the ∆-scale of growth or diminution.

So again we find an immediate relationship between the 3 elements of reality, S or T, ST and ∆ST, in its growing complexity and the 3 basic operandi of algebra, sum, product and polynomials.

What about the more complex scalar ‘motions’ of space-time? They are not that simple, as they combine elements of the pure ones. But as all ternary, Universal grammars, the complexity is born of the iteration of those elementary motions:

  • Evolution is a change in the topology of a system, so essentially a process of space-time morphological in-form-ative change better described with topological elements.
  • Growth and diminution involves reproduction and evolution of topological form and its inverse.
  • Birth and extinction represent an ∆±1 change, combined with an ∆T increase of information or a loss of it all ∆S, which are often expressed with logarithmic scales.

And so most motions involve both a Past to future, ∆+1, social evolutionary arrow accompanied with changes in topology. And as such are pure ‘GST’ Ælgebraic motions, better described with the formalism of Æ and its symbols S>T, T<<S, ∑∆-1 Λ ∆… and so on.

Since in its most general form, algebra is the study of mathematical symbols and the rules for manipulating these symbols; the definition holds. And as algebra is a unifying thread of almost all of classic mathematics, so happens with Ælgebra.

In that regard, classic algebra (we shall call arithmetics) includes everything regarding those 3 operations, ±, x, % and log, x². And its symmetry as we have seen is immediate.

While modern algebra deals with the study of abstractions such as groups, rings, and fields; sets and Boolean algebras; and categories and elements… So we can subdivided Æ in 3±1 age subfields:

  • Birth: THE study of æ proper (existential equations).
  • Youth: of classic polynomial equations or arithmetics (S,t; st and ∆ systems in its interaction).
  • Maturity: of abstract structures, or algebra proper concerned, with group theory (the internal social structures of the Universe).
  • Old age: of inflationary information (set theory and other ‘weird’ algebras)
  • Extinction: the transference from human minds to digital minds (computer algebra, boolean algera)

∆•st of space-time and its limits in space, time, ∆-scales and mind perception.

So space-time is always in its whole ‘plenum beings’ made of 3 elements, which in topology, are called:

-Tiƒ: the singularity or monad-mind in its centre of maximal communication

-Spe: the membrane or limiting, hard entropic circular system that encloses

-ST: the space-time much larger reality that mixes lineal expansive outer membranes and internal singularities:

circular motionScreen Shot 2016-05-09 at 23.56.35

ALL systems of physics and biology and sociology show the same ternary elements: the membrane singularity and space-time between them.

In the graph physical systems, from electromagnetism to fluid dynamics to  gravitational gradients, charges in physics, have the 3 parts. In biology they are cellular protein membranes and nuclei and cytoplasm, skins and brains and organs. In sociology they are national borders and capitals, and the internal territory. In non-euclidean geometry (right side, the inner parts cannot reach the membrane, and so it appears as a relative infinity, and the central singularity (A point), connects with all the points within the membrane, as its focus of information. It is that constant interaction between membrane and singularity what moods the internal vital space of energy/momenta, of the being.

In physics all Maxwell’s laws can be deduced from the existence of an external circular membrane (magnetism). So happens in gravitation, (orbits which ‘scan a bidimensional aerolar surface). And all systems will be centred in a singularity (attractive vortex, charge).

Moreover we shall see that TIME has also those limiting membranes (death) and informative centres (seeds of information at birth).

And the scalar Universe will have also those non-E unreachable limits, (Universal Constant limits of c-speed and To temperature).

All this is the essence of topology that defines an ‘open ball’ as the space-time volume limited by a central singularity and an external membrane, which are NOT perceivable, included within the open ball. 

So the concept of finite infinities, limiting membranes in space, time (birth-death) and scales (limiting unreachable constants of maximal information and maximal extension) are essential to understand formally and logically the Universe.

We are limited in time by the birth-death finite enclosure of our world cycle of existence, in space by the skin/membrane that breaks space-time into us; and in the scales of size of the ‘5th dimension’ by the increasing ‘blurred uncertainty and dark spaces’ which limits our perception of them beyond the ∆±3 scales of atoms and galaxies.

And so we are also limited IN THE KNOWLEDGE THE MIND MIGHT ACQUIRE OF ALL THE INFORMATION OF THE UNIVERSE, WHICH ONLY A BEING HOLDS ABOUT ITSELF, making ‘absolute truth’, 1, in terms of probability, only ‘existing’ in the being in itself.

Those four limits of birth and death, of absolute seeds of information (seminal seed) and entropy (explosive death); of singularity (the mind of information) and membrane (the skin) in space; of organisation above and below, in ∆±1 levels; and in knowledge provided by the limits of the language ARE ESSENTIAL TO ANY UNDERSTANDING OF MAN AS A LIMITED BEING, IN A ∞ UNIVERSE, BUT MAN DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THOSE LIMITS. Hence the astounding arrogance of scholars, scientists, dogmatic axiomatic methods of ‘truth’ (Hilbert in mathematics, which still denies Godel’s incompleteness theory). And the result of course is that you have a human astounding ego, who thinks to be so special, so unique, so unlimited, so galactic and Universal and YET IT IS SO IGNORANT.  And all what it does is to hold its pretension of infinity.

The decametric scale: 3 x 3 +o = 10.

8266397157164128‘The universe is written in the language of geometry, lines, spheres and triangles’. Galileo had a point – all reductionist views of reality are indeed half-truths. But in this case it is a huge truth.

The languages of the Universe are mainly 3, Topology, the most advanced form of geometry with a ‘bit of inner motion’, which describe the 3 ‘timespace’ only forms of reality – hence the determinism of topological evolution and the awesome capacity to describe it all with the ternary generator of those 3 topologies. 

Regarding triangles, intuitively humans both in earlier religion of words (Judaism) and Pythagorean religions of the number, were considered the ‘tetraktys’ and symbol of the ‘tetragrammaton’ (graph) – the symbol of it all.

As indeed, the 3 topological organs of all systems (lineal, toroid limbs/fields; hyperbolic, body-waves and spherical, informative head-particles, shown in the graph, which need only a little imagination to convert into a woman’s body – first surface, a leg, second, and a head 3rd one), suffice to create reality.

Yet as all ‘is scalar’, all subdivides into ‘ternary fractal sub-elements’. So to include the co-existence in the 5th dimension of parts and wholes, we can immediately subdivide the 3 topologies into 3 ‘sub-elements’ and put them in each of the corners of the tetraktys/tetragrammaton; while the central point, which is perfectly connected to all others, is the soul-mind-0-point, 10th dimension – the system that is apperceives the whole, connects its and tries to preserve it, through the world cycle of being.

(The reader should get accustomed to the ‘taste’ of GST which is the HOMOLOGIC, ISOMORPHIC METHOD, of putting always a physical, biological and socio-economical example of the 3 main sub-disciplines of knowledge to show the unity of it all as we illustrate reality).

Alas, the growth in the ‘5th dimension of scales’ happen through 10 dimensional ‘social organisation’.

Thus the previous graphs of Eames’ ‘Powers of 10’  is also the game of social existence.

Since it is also the number of quanta of space-time needed either in frequency or in population (spatial organic or temporal world cycle view of a system), either through time or space to create a new social scale (ab. §) that ‘becomes a new larger functional whole’ able to apperceive and process entropy-motion, informative forms and combine them through the ‘3rd corner’ to ’emit seminal’ reproductive particles, coordinated by the central whole.

Let us though then, once this is understood depart from reductionist ‘mathematical physics’ , and realise that what truly MATTERS IS organic FUNCTION, NOT the triangular form, beyond the obvious fac