Home » ‘Tº: ¡-logic

‘Tº: ¡-logic

±∞∆•ST

Advertisements

The Universe is a fractal super organism made…

  • ≈ Balanced Symmetries between its 4 Dual components:
  • S… In space of a simultaneous ternary topology, (|+O≈ ø)… made of 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy)…
  • ∆: In scales of an Ensemble of ∞  relative fractal scales of ∆º super organisms each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ð:  In sequential time of cycles of existence, of 3 ages, each one dominated by one of those 3 networks (motion-youth, or relative past; iterative present dominant in vital energy, and informative 3rd age or relative future);
  • @: Put together into language mirrors,  by an åctive mind that perceives those networks of ∆-1 cellular parts as a whole being, enacting simple aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, in order to maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being, achieved through two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals.
THIS POST is dedicated to languages and its logic properties and the way it creates reality.

In the organic paradigm embedded in the latin->European->Social culture, which reached it maximal truth in science, in the Wien school origin of general systems, the WHYS OF THE UNIVERSE are always organic, and the description are the linguistic mirrors of which mathematics is the best.

So only organicism is real in the whole sense of the Universe, while languages-mirrors are local orders.

The EGOCY of our present, entropic age of human civilization rejects this (Precisely because it is becoming dissolved). So we  reject the power of networks – self-mademan myths and tribalism in history. Yet  networks are more powerful and survive.

How this work on languages IS OBVIOUS: LANGUAGES ARE LOCAL, IMPLEMENTED BY BRAINS, AS THEIR SOFTWARE, which orders reality AFTER THE LANGUAGE MIRRORS IT, not the other way around as creationist religions and mathematical physicists think:

In the graph, which I re-designed from” road to irreality” (: a work by Penrose, one of the most staunchest creationists of physics (a mathematician along his friend Hawking, which shuns off the laws of the experimental method) his view of reality is VOID as in all PLATONIC (PLATO by the way never said that, they should be called Pythagorean, a much more primitive ‘magic view’) of HARDWARE MINDS and LOCALITY. In his view the Language creates the Universe.

In reality the Universe is a fractal organism, and as all its parts can be considered similar we can ‘make synoptic language’ with enormous power to reflect multiple similar images in its essence, which ultimately will be the laws of ‘Space-time’, which are Organic because that is the main property of co-existence in different planes (∆§cales), topological because that is the main property of Spatial adjacent topologies that form super organisms, and Logic, Multicausal, as that is the main property of the dimotions of time. 

So the ultimate causality ∆->T->S IS not Platonic mathematics but ∆organic properties -> T-Logic properties -> S-Topologic, mathematical properties.

In true form, the proper expansion of mathematics allows also to develop a lot of ∆§calar properties as numbers are ‘Social ensembles of undistinguishable beings’ and polynomial algebra and analysis studies how parts and wholes become one; but then mathematics properly understood become another proof of the vital, organic nature of the Universe. And since mathematics is based in logic in its internal nature and experimental proof in its outside qualities, the mirror is very good but we REPEAT, the true causes come from the ∆§ðructure of reality and its ∆-scalar properties, STopo-logic ONES.

SO WE ADAPT PENROSE GRAPh to show how reality is constantly going back and forth:

The ∆§T BioTopoLogic properties caused by spacetime beings, are synoptically reduced to what they have in common, since all forms are ‘generically’ speaking self-similar. And then THE LANGUAGES REINFORCE AS MIRRORS EXPANDED INTO REALITY those properties ordering local territories.

So the graph shows that back and forth  to adequate to how REALITY  IS created LOCALLY by ‘minds‘, which are the language software on the hardware brains of T.œs, ONLY after the language reflects the LIVING cycles (dimotions) of all time-space beings with those properties:

You can see in the graph how it works: First the whole Universe is ‘shrunk into the mind mirror’ and only then the mind mirror according to the efficiency of the language imprints bak ONLY THE TERRITORY OF ‘ARISTOTELIAN’ ORDER OR BODYWAVE ENERGY OF THE SYSTEM…

THE DRAWING in original Penrose ONLY had the mind ordering the Universe, as the source and only God in Aristotelian sense: ‘god is the unmoved causal point that orders the motion of the energy (body-wave) around it’.

So yes, languages do create reality but all of them, and all of them locally and all of them organically because they act as the mind of all kind of systems. Obviously atomic matter is AS IN CRYSTALS ABLE TO FORM mirror-images in geometric form, and that is why they do have such an efficient capacity to order – and that is why topology (dimensions with form or dimotions) are the language of it all:

Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality. In the graph we see them ordering with different languages, different scales of reality which will reflect in a larger whole, the linguistic image they hold.

The mind paradox: the meaning of Galilean relativity. The singularity as a mind.

‘The smallest point is a world in in itself’ Leibniz, on the fundamental particle of Reality: The fractal point=world of space-time.

 

“God is the unmoved (perceptive) center of a body of energy, moving around it”. “We are all Gods (of our super organisms” Aristotle

Now there is another way to observe the Equation, ∆ð≥S@, as the formal reduction of a temporal flow of cycles of space-time into a mind-mapping, from the infinite Universe into the linguistic, still zero mind.

All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

Euclidean mathematics, as Descartes and Kant understood is only the 3 perpendicular ‘space-time elements’ of a massless ray of light merely shrinks all other scales of reality to fit into the mind.

In the graph, as our mind is electronic, we feed on light energy and transform it into an informative mapping of the Universe, reduced to what light sees. Thus our space is light space-time, with its 3 Euclidean coordinates, a fact that was first understood NOT by physicists but by impressionist artists, Leonardo, whose motto ‘saper vedere’, guided my inquire as a young artist on reality behind the languages that describe it, and then by the impressionists; and finally by Picasso, who departed from reality, affirming he painted thoughts, so he studied the ‘elements’ of the mind mapping, its entropic lines (cubist age) and its cyclical forms (female portraits).

So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

The equation of the mind.

Screen Shot 2018-02-12 at 5.20.21 PM

The problem of mathematicians with a single time/singularity  IS THAT THEY CANNOT EMPATHIZE with the infinite other LANGUAGES and beings of the Universe… To be an Aristotelian God among Gods, to be an infinite infinitesimal, the equation of all minds-monads:

O x ∞ = Konstant:  O-singularity (linguistic mind) x ∞ time space cycles (Universe) = Constant world,

That is the game. But to survive in that game you must also be aware there are other infinite singularities, all with the same rights to feel god… That is a much more perfect Leibnizian Universe… than the simplex one physicists sponsor. The equation that describers the theory of everything in that sense is the simplest of all of them:

0 x ∞ = K, the 0-1 temporal unit sphere, reflected in the 1-∞ spatial statistical one.

It is the main theorem of measure theory,  which in physics reflects the equivalence between a quantum temporal scale (0-1 probabilistic description, of the faster, temporal quantum world) and the thermodynamical statistical one (1-∞ spatial description of the larger, slower thermodynamic world…

As time is faster, the o-1 smaller sphere fits better the quantum description, as space is slower, the 1-∞ fits better the molecular world, but both are by measure theory equivalent, because as we shall show bit by bit, species by species, all mind think the same: to be gods, to survive, to order its territory, and come on top:

Space is then ONLY within the mind that measures in simultaneous perception the multiple vital space-time cycles translated into the language of a still mind that perceives in itself. Thus space is virtual. The true substance of reality being its temporal motions. On the other hand the description human minds  (@) make of the Universe is subconsciously biased by those ‘still, linguistic mind mappings of space’, (∫@) in which the ∞ of time motions (∆ð) is reduced and equalled to the spatial mind mapping.

∫@≥∆ð

Minds order as linguistic gods a territory around themselves, its fractal body and entropic world. As such they are the linguistic Aristotelian, final unmoved singularity Gods of reality.This simple equation of similarity between the space perception of reality provided by a mind, and the whole Universe of moving time-cycles (as nothing is still outside the mind’s perception, being all observed in detail in perpetual motion), appeared in science as a philosophy of the Universe, when Descartes realized that what we see is NOT reality but what the mind ‘stops’ in its selective perception of all the information of reality. So the only truth we can depart from is the fact that we think and perceive still linguistic thoughts, hence we exist; making of informative perception in a still mind, the first ‘action’ of existence, even prior to motion which is unconscious of being.

Descartes astounding insight soon brought here to define mathematically, topologically and conceptually a ‘mind-singularity of order’, the ‘missing’ factor on our descriptions of reality, unfortunately was soon forgotten, and substituted by the naive realism of modern science – what we or our electronic instruments see is what there is there. But only marrying the spatial mind-linguistic view and the Universe of infinite time cycles, we can factor in all the elements and start to unknot the bias the spatial mind cast upon our objective comprehension of reality, which is our task as scientists.

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’. Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs.

Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as physical systems do, to calculate functions of space-time that WORK mirroring reality – hence they must exist. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely NOT, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors – what matters though is that they do process information, order territories that become time§paœrganisms and hence WITHOUT THEM there will only be entropy, not order, reason why physicists who don’t recognise those ‘poles of in-form-ation’ deny order and believe the Universe is a chaotic entropic state. YET WE OBSERVE order, so the experimental method oblige us to conclude there is a ‘darwinian automatic non-conscious selection’ of systems which develop singularities and ‘SURVIVE’ creating the order of reality.

Consciosuness would then be an unneeded dual mirror in which the first mirror perceives the spatial mapping of the second mirror, dialoguing with it (in the way I robot is consciousness by having a second brain). In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only very good ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms.

So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them.

Since there are ∞ minds, gauging information; and stopping the motions of time into the intelligence of formal space, as they try to ‘stiff’ reality into the mirror image of the language, which of course they confuse with the universe itself – and this is indeed the origin of the creationist theories of religious and scientific people, we must now debunk on firm grounds as we have a better grasp of why we see still the earth (our mind stops its motion) when objectively it is moving, why in other words we see ‘spaces’ when it is all about ‘times’.

A subject in itself fundamental to understand Relativity, is brought here to point out, the reason why in entropic only big-bang theories, we do see indeed light space-time expanding between galaxies, as light is space and so when it comes closer to the mass of the galaxy, elongates/red shifts its color (the only real effect observed; as we obviously are NOT out there in-between Andromeda and the Milky way with a tape). And vice versa, when Light collapses into our electronic ‘eye’ or any electronic source, it increases its frequency  balancing both effect to cancel the supposed big-bang death of the Universe.

But in the scalar REALITY, gravitation makes points LARGER when we observe them in the scale of the fifth dimension where they do interact above us, and will EASILY evaporate our ’empty bubble’ of light-light beings.

So Hilbert and Cantor who talked of ‘their imaginary paradise from where nobody would expel them, ass the Jihad warriors who die to enter paradise, just invented non-existen points, lines, planes with their imagination.

In the next graph, we see thus, the true meaning of the 5th and 1st Non-E postulate, which define both the real fractal point (1st postulate) and the real mind that bends it into a smallish mind. Since the fractal point does have breath, as it includes a volume of energy, entropy and information, carried by a relative number of ‘finitesimal’ parallel waves, but the ‘Aristotelian mind’, reduces it to an Euclidean point:

We have to introduce the first postulate of non-Æ so you realise how ‘limited’ is the homunculus mind.

Thus, human egos are just finitesimals with a huge ego, because they confuse their zero point-mind with the real infinite Universe, of fractal points, thinking the volume of information they store in their mind is all. 

Fractal points: the fundamental particle

We are going to use 3 basic symbols for the Singularity and the territorial body wave it orders around it as a vital energy, encircled by an angular momentum, or ‘membrane’, which forms the basic organism of reality a membrain of vital energy, moving around: œ, @, •, which you can consider 3 degrees of development of the singularity as an organism, a self-centered mind with a will order its body around it through its actions, or a mere point of perception. The interaction and different dimensions of the singularity in its different complex actions makes it by far the most important and yet less distinguishable, hence less amenable to direct experimental observation of all the elements of the being.

In mathematics it can be studied as a fractal particle, or point, •.

Mathematics, as a language that represents reality with simplified symbols, has a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplify and integrate the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath.

However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content. But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.

So we propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of ‘—motions’ and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point.

This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels. So we must consider that what Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time is its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye.

That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of ‘—motions’ and information that defines them.

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel

Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:

. ____________

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

A point external to a line is crossed by parallel forces.

             Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points:           ===========o

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.

So each point is in fact a 3-dimensional point, and if we go to the next scale, a 3×3=9 dimensional point and so on. Yet those dimensions are the so-called fractal dimensions, which are not ‘extended to infinity’ but only within the size of the point.

In Euclidean geometry, a point has no volume, no dimension, but string theorists say that even the smallest points of the Universe, cyclical strings, have inner dimensions that we observe when we come closer to them. That is the essence of a fractal point: To be a fractal world, a space-time in itself.

‘Any Non-Euclidean point is a fractal space-time with a minimal of 3 internal, topological, spatial dimensions and an external time motion in the st+1 ecosystem in which it exists’

This simple law is the most important law of the 4th paradigm, foreseen by Leibniz in his Monadology, the foundation of the mathematical model of Multiple spaces-times that completes the 5 Postulates of non-Euclidean geometry and gives us the tools necessary to create a complex new logic and new mathematical model of the Universe, easy to connect through topology with the isomorphisms of the previous paradigm of a single metric space-time continuum.

Further on those points must be described always in 4 dimensions, with motion. This should have been obvious, but abstract mathematics simplify entities into numbers and static forms, and organic motion properties disappear. Yet we still say ‘San Francisco is at 8 hours from LA’, because we mean that journey is a combination of the motion of a car and the spatial distance. Thus we measure reality in Time-space, not only in space as Euclidean maths do.

Thus, in the same way Saturn’s rings stop being planes without volume when we come closer and observe them as fractal points, called planetoids; Non-Euclidean points acquire both motion and volume when we approach to them. In words of Klein, a sphere is not a continuous static form, but a group of points in cyclical movement. So in the same way the Saturn’s rings are a group of planetoids, a Klein space – the space-time that fills a point has motion – it is the sum of a series of cycles.

Einstein didn’t go further, adapting the other 4 Euclidean postulates to the new Geometrical unit: a fractal point with volume. Only then we will be able to define the 2 planes of physical forces, the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism, or any system in which several planes of space-time co-exist together (as in a human being extended from atomic to social planes of cyclical existence).

In all those systems planes are made with cellular points, Riemannian spheres with volume that form lines, which are waves between points that exchange ‘—motions’ and information and planes, which are organs of self-similar points that process ‘—motions’ or information in parallel networks. Thus the 5 Postulates of Non-Sp Geometry vitalize the Universe as a series of networks of ‘—motions’ and information of self-similar cellular points. Since the line and the plane acquire volume and become self-similar to the commonest forms of the Universe, the wave and the network of points with a 3-D volume.

This simple fact explains one of the most important discoveries of modern physics, the Holographic principle, according to which information might be bidimensional, as in the screen of a computer or the page of a book. Now bidimensionality no longer becomes ‘magic’ since the 3rd dimension is the relative size of the ‘fractal point-particle’. Thus bidimensional sheets of information do have a minimal 3rd Dimension; the inner content of the point, which in a relative universe of infinite sizes seems to us a particle-point without volume, as we don’t see either the volume of a sheet of paper or a pixel.

All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks. Now this might sound absurd to the anthropomorphic reader that thinks humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that those points obey in their actions and communicative flows within a network the same isomorphisms:

humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds, the geometries of social groups are also the same and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on ‘—motions’ and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. And so that group of isomorphisms of networks becomes a primary why for all beings of the Universe.

A fact the leads us to the final element needed to understand the why of the Universe: ‘non-Euclidean points’ organize networks that become points of a higher scale, which reproduce and organize new networks; and so the Universe keep growing in fractal scales, from particles that organize networks and become atoms that organize networks and become molecules that organize networks and become cells, that become organisms, that become planetary societies and planets and stars form gravitational networks that become galaxies, organized by dark matter into Universal networks.

Because all entities have motion reproduction is merely the repetition of a motion with form. Because each entity has 4 time arrows, all of them trace multiple trajectories in search of those arrows, hence they realize multiple time cycles.

For example, a human feeds on ‘—motions’ and information with body and head, reproduces through multiple social cycles and evolves into societies. Our actions are more complex but essentially the same of those of any particle.

The Œ-points: monads that order the Sentient Universe.

This first example of the complexity of the Universe, which many scientists, mostly physicists, have shunned off, obscuring a deeper knowledge of reality, hopefully prepares you to persevere in the understanding of the complex ambivalence of the Universe, simplified by the human mind, whose equation in the metric of the 5th dimension – one of the infinite varieties of Tƒ x Sp = ∆-mind – we can now explain:

O@ (infinitesimal Œ-point or mind) x ∞ð (Universe perceived) = Œ (constant mapping of reality)

What a mind does is rather simple. The Universe out there has infinite time cycles that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cyclical motions. This is an ∞, which we cannot store inside us.

So we simplify all those motions into ‘forms’ perceived as extensions of space, Sp.

On the other hand the mind is a Tƒ, spherical system, with 2 different spheres: an external membrane with sensorial detectors, which ‘shrinks’ into a relative smaller point, the eye and then the brain, which transforms Sp, the infinite cycles made into spatial forms, and keeps shrinking them to an infinitesimal mapping of reality, a still image, very much as the way a camera reduces reality to a virtual shallow image in 2 dimensions.

And this can be done because of a property of spherical forms, called the Poincare Conjecture: you can  shrink  a topological sphere (any closed membrane, a skin, a planetary surface, is a sphere), as much as you want without deforming its information.  So we find infinite minds in the Universe, ‘monads’ in Leibniz’s terms, which as he said ‘are points, which store a world in it selves’.

So we could also define the Universe as an infinity of ‘world’, fractal minds perceiving reality from those Œ points. What all those fractal minds do? Time cycles? Why. Because they keep perceiving and gauging information through them, and they keep absorbing ‘energy’ to move, and they keep reproducing their time cycles in parallel forms of space-time, and they keep evolving with other points into larger systems of points, topological networks, which have organic nature.

The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they act-react accordingly.

 Mind languages do stop the 3 motions OR CONSERVED quantities, into space forms, and with its syntax mimic how those 3 elements combine to create the space-time super organisms of the Universe.
So we could say they map out superorganisms of space departing of infinite time-cycles, seeds of information, mind or simultaneous networks.
So the 3 main human languages, maths, words and images are ‘still images’ of a living, moving Universe of infinite time cycles: S@≤∆Τ
Let us then switch to the subjective mind view and include a first analysis on how the mind stops motion into form, and how it biases in this manner our perception of motion, despite the rejection of ‘naive realists’ that simply eliminate from reality all those spatial mental elements (as in the dominant philosophy of science today, logical positivism, which simply is not interested in study what cannot be measured, and unfortunately has substituted the perennial ‘pan psychic philosophy of reality’ that considers the existence of infinite such minds that stop linguistically reality to perceive it).

We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’. Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.

In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

Now, this theoretical minimum, which gives birth to the biggest r=evolution of maths since Riemann, ‘does away with Hilbert’; but to fully  put the copenhagen interpretation to rest and complete the understanding of mathematics in experimental terms,  we need as we have done with spatial geometry and topology, show how temporal algebra and its numbers, do also reflect reality, in an evolutionary process called the closure of numbers that again will follow the ternary, universal syntax of ‘REALITY’.

We have so far considered the Universe in its fundamental principles – the topological adjacent construction in simultaneity of super organisms, which sequentially will live a world cycle, ‘traveling’ through 3 planes of the fifth dimension. Neat and simple, that is really what there is to it. Minds though, mirror those infinite worldcycles of existence of other space-time super organisms with languages ‘stopping’ them into a mapping that allows them to ‘perceive=gauge=sense‘ information.

And we highlight sense because a ‘still mapping’ sense in each stopping, locked ‘crystal image’ a measure of its self. The sentient Universe can only be ultimately explained if ‘perception’ exists within the language, as when you think words, you sense words, when your eye sees light and maps into an electronic mapping you are seeing. And when an atom maps a geometric image in its ‘locked’ ‘stopped’ spin, it must perceive that geometry as information.

Minds thus are infinitesimal points-particles that stop, gauge, perceive, and move – and then we have the sensation of motion-pleasure.

This of course is not within the realm of the scientific method. You cannot measure those sensations of awareness-pain vs. pleasure-dissolution, in-form-ation, pressure vs. release-entropy ONLY sense them as humans. So if we had first a difficult hurdle to cross trying to prove the existence of minds but passed it objectively by considering a mind-singularity to hold the will of existence of a T.œ – hence as invisible gravitation shows in its external effect, so will the existence of a singularity through its external actions; at the final level of ‘human awareness’ of the game of existence – sensations of the dual pain-pleasure reward system (with all its parallel and perpendicular events/sensations) there is ONLY a justification to the existence of other minds – that we humans are made of the same substances that all those other minds, space and time, and hence what we sense other atomic systems must.

Therefore IF OUR LAST REWARD is the flow of sensations, with its duality pain-pleasure, hate-love, etc. which we can easily adscribe to geometrical perpendicular (cut, pain) parallel (friction pleasure) properties and many other dualities we have established for all systems, IT MUST EXIST IN ALL OTHER SYSTEMS of space-time. That is, atoms must feel pain when op-pressed by huge masses, pleasure when released in entropy, but also ‘awareness’ of a more complex inner still image, when flows of information converge through forces in its non-euclidean singularity; and so it is only left then 2 questions:

  1. What are those sensations? Answer: the very essence of time as a motion/flow. Motion in itself seems evanescent; as sensations are… Yet combining them, this flow of sensation-motion becomes very likely the ultimate program-will for all T.œs to exist – the ultimate, ‘Dasein’, ‘being in time’.
  2. Yet we cannot go beyond this, as this is the ultimate ‘reference’ of reality we have as humans. So there is no MORE methods of knowledge beyond what it is contained in our ‘selves’. Know yourself, the method of knowledge of Aristotle; ‘saper vedere’, the method of Leonardo and know how to see and calculate with attached machines, the method of Galileo, to which we have added a few ‘tricks’ thus completes the capacity to probe reality. Are there more layers beyond motion as sensation in time? We cannot answer. We don’t know. As all is relative, in the same manner we can only probe into ∆±3 planes around our ∆º and hint by force of motion the existence of an invisible gravitational/cosmological plane at ∆±4 but no more, beyond the duality of sensation, there is nowhere else to go.

In this post we study the linguistic nature of the human mind to study then the 3 main evolutions of our mind in time (the verbal, mathematical and at-ages) and further on analysing the 3 main mind-languages of man (temporal words, spatial art and s=t music symmetries).

Languages in that sense are the dynamic, active property of monad-singularities, where the zero sum of pure form develops an action-reaction process with the world-universe that starts the game of existence.

3 scales of complexity in languages.

We study the languages of the mind and then concentrate in the 3 ages of evolution of reason in human languages:

  1. I=eye (space language) > wor(l)d (time language) of man which dominated our earlier life, till the industrial revolution overdeveloped…

2. The mathematical digital language of machines, today dominant, but not yet profound enough to describe all forms of nature, and so, bond to evolve as one of the many languages that mirror the universe, which we will evolve redifining its unit, the fractal point:

3. The S@=∆ð language of space-time that is even larger in its syntax as its fractal generator includes all other languages and beings… As it can be used to describe verbal, organic logic, mathematical, digital topologic languages mirrors of its  5D² Space time DIMENSIONS ORIGIN OF ITS Disomorphic qualities, embedded in all systems of reality, which we resume in the ‘Rashomon’ truths of studying for each system its 5 Dimensions of space and time and the properties derived of them.

Languages express the elements of reality and its operandi

It is then clear that what languages as synoptic mirrors of the mind will try to do is to establish the basic relationships between the space, time, scale of the being, expressing its operandi, DEPENDING on the degree of perception the being has of reality and its scales which might be reduced if the being is not fully aware of all the scales of existence, as most minds exist only in a plane of reality, ‘consciously’ of it.

Yet even in the smallest of all realities the being will have at least to perceive ‘organisms’ and ‘worldcycles’ the naked essence of existence, hence at least use two elements, one representing a space-formal state and other representing a motion state, and a system of operandi to relate them or else the being will NOT be able to command a perceptive mapping of reality.

 

UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR ≈ FRACTAL GENERATOR

FOR ALL WHAT HAS BEEN SAID, It follows that all languages ultimately follow a Universal ternary grammar, Space < Operandi > Time, which mirrors space-time a(nti)symmetries… So all…

  • Syntaxes of spatial, mathematical and temporal, logic, verbal languages use ternary elements to explain reality…relating with its verbs/operandi the nature of those 2 simplest substances of which all seems to be made; the motions of cyclical time clocks and the meaning of space dimensions, and its scientific combinations..

They are the simplest elements and all process of reality have them… starting with the motion stored in space vacuum & the information carried by the frequency and form of the time cycles of the smallest particles, which give us together the first energies of reality… THROUGH all scales, each one reflecting a similar ternary:

Γ:   S@ <≈> ∆ð      Universal grammar.

So S <≈> T Is the minimal TRIAD OF elements for any T.Œ , defined by its ‘Fractal Generator’.

The most general above is a logic equation, which resumes the syntax of all languages and hence unifies them all (verbal, visual, mathematical thought),  and so it can unify also all the forms of knowledge derived from those languages (mathematical physics, verbal evolution, visual arts, etc.).

Since the Universe has 3 dimensional elements, plus a scalar repetitive structures of 4D parts and 5D wholes.

‘Spe: spatial lineal momentum’ +Tƒ, temporal information (stored in the form and cycles of angular momentum, of clocks of time); and its combinations, space-time actions of energy described by verbs or mathematical operand.

Some languages:

Spe (space)<energy>Tiƒ (Time): red-motion < Green: energy> Blue-information. F(x): Space ≈ G(Y), Time function.

Informative subject<verb: action-Energy> object: entropy.

Height-informative pole x  length, motion point = width energetic-reproduction point and so on.

To which we must add a ‘new 5th dimension’ of scalar parts that become wholes, which reality shows, as it builds from particles atoms, then  molecules, cells, matter, organisms, solar systems, galaxies, Universes.

And so languages reflect clearly with the iteration of its simpler 3 elements, which become ‘longer sentences’ in  treatise combinations, the higher language of T.œ.

In maths, we can see the duality and scalar growth reality in its series of operandi: Sum/rest->multiplication/division->potency/logarithm.

In words, we have 3 elements and 3 scalar growths: sentence, paragraph, narrative.

So happens in geometry in 3 scales: point->line->plane->volume and so on.

Thus, the elements of each T.Œ, and its jargon/language, once we understand in those ternary terms, both ‘reality’ and the languages that describe it  in different sciences, each one specialised in a relative scale of the ‘5th dimension’ become clear in all languages: mathematical physics & chemistry, to which biology ads verbal evolutionary languages, arts substitutes the spatial geometry of mathematics by the visual perception of the human eye, and history introduces the subjective ethics of the wor(l)d.

So the astounding quantity of data gathered by each science, fits within the scaffolding of the Generator Equation, from where each language departs, in which the equations, postulates and statements of each scalar science are defined.

Thus T.Πwill not only classify all sciences, but not surprisingly will reveal an enormous number of solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.

The kaleidoscopic perspectives on reality: perception through multiple languages.

SPATIAL, SUPERORGANIC VIEW:  the fractal generator of a T.œ requires to study its vital Space, or energy enclosed by its cyclical clocks of ðime, self-centered into an @-mind, whose ∆ø linguistic is a still mapping of all external ∆±¡ time§pace organisms, infinitesimal Non-E point mirror of the larger world, 0 S x ∞ ð= @ – hence the origin of its ∆§calar planes connected through iterative flows of entropy and information, ≤≥:  S@≥∆ð.       The fractal generator in space thus gives a full account of any superorganism in exist¡ence, made of 3 topological O x | = Ø structures – an ensemble of ∆-1 energy that moves an ∆ø mind, co-existing in a larger ∆+1 world. The Rashomon method of truth then extracts from the generator equation, different sub-equations to analyze in more detail the parts of the being.
So we use the ‘generator equation’ and its 5D ‘Rashomon’ elements to convey a full sense of the being and explain the 5Dimensions of any spacetime organism/event by considering the spatial= informative and temporal= moving sides of reality putting those 4 parameters together through a(nti)symmetric ≤≥ flows of communication: ∆t≥S@.

The Universe is a fractal super organism made of…

  •   A(nti)symmetries between its 4 Dual components that can either evolve in Balance≈become symmetric or annihilate=become Perpendicular/antisymmetric:
  • S: space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
  • ∆: distributed in ∆±i  relative fractal scales that  come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
  • ð: time cycles  a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
  • @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being. Because the scientific method requires OBJECTIVE measure of the existence of a mind, which is NOT perceivable directly, we infer its existence by the fact a system performs the 5 external actions, which can be measure objectively, in the same manner we infer the existence of gravitational in-form-ative forces by its external actions upon massive objects. Hence eliminating the previous limit for a thorough understanding of the sentient, informative Universe. And further classify organic in simplex minds – all, which must gauge information, move and feed to survive, and complex systems, those who can perform a palingenetic reproductive, social evolution, ∆-1: ∑∆-1≈∆º.

The study of those 4 elements of all realities, its actions and ternary operandi, which result in a social evolution together of the 2 + elements (the balanced body-wave and informative @particle-mind, and the entropic destruction or ab=use of the – simpler, lineal limb-potential-prey, which structures the dynamic ‘Generator Equation’ of all Space-time Systems of the Universe, written in its simplest form as a singularity-mind equation, O x ∞ = K or in dynamic way, S@<≈>∆ð, is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.

There are many views on such simple elements, specially when we fully understand the key principles of its operandi which are either opposite, Darwinian, or social, parallel – a principle which is as most of the principles ignored by science, vital, organic, biological; and either bring together the asymmetries between lower planes of more information and larger planes of more energy or bring them into destruction.

So goes for the asymmetry between | and O forms, depending on how they come to each other tangentially or ‘penetrating’ to reproduce LITERALLY as we fuk each other’s gender (: i tell you is all vital geometries. 

And so goes for the different 1st and third ages of existences…

So that is the game: 3 asymmetries of scale, age and form, which can come together or annihilate and each language represent in different manners, the most well known that between:

names (forms) and verbs (motions); colours of blue and red, form and motion which can either be played reproductively into green or anti-complementary into yellow, the colour of eviL destruction, of gold (:

It is all in the codes of colours, we shall see even in the game of Nature.

All is in the codes of the Universe and its operators, also clear in mathematics, with the duality of inverted operations, + -, X ÷, √ xª, ∫∂.

So the simplest method of extracting a meaningful quantity of information on a being or event requires to comment on the 4±operandi ‘5’ perspectives, even when we study as we do in the first line, those elements in themselves. In this post we shall deal thus with time from the perspective of space, time, symmetries, scales and mind languages that ‘stop it’ in the singularity of t=motion zero, from black holes to eddies to charges, to brains to frozen genetic DNA…

A complete analysis of languages, we shall attempt in different posts of this web would include the understanding of its spatial, temporal and organic ternary variation, similar to that of cultures. Spatial, mathematical languages dominant in white visual cultures, verbal, temporal languages, dominant in brachycephalic cultures and the organic, vital view of existence, proper of life, black emotional/motor height axis of the brain.

Languages must be then understood in relationship to the senses of human networks to the external Universe. And so this would be a full account of them from a 5D p.o.v.:

  • Mathematical languages.
  • Logic, verbal languages.
  • The 3+3 sensorial languages:
  • The lower senses, smell, taste, touch.
  • The Higher senses. Color languages: the animal syntax
  • Human, mental languages: emotions and thoughts.
  • Art: the human perception of the Game of Existence.
  • The ternary structure of music: Se(bass)<Scales, rhythms & Harmony>Tƒ(Treble)
  • Bidimensional manifolds of information: The art of painting
  • Empty spaces vs. formal membranes: The art of architecture.
  • Compressing the world cycles of human existences (and of lately machines): The art of film.
  • Degrading the human mind: the decadence of all languages in the age of digital thought.

Precisions on the creative process of reality. The non-aristotelian algebra of feed-back causality


In the graph, the back and forth relationship between the infinite single Universe, its infinite partial minds, which become perceptive through a language-mirror, and then in the left its individual ego-centered singularity mirror projecting aback through limited arrows/actions of space-time, the linguistic image re-ordering a partial part of reality: its body and territory
. It is this feedback constant equation what creates reality and so we can also write another Γenerator equation, about the interaction of those three elements that orders each relative fractal partial being/territory of the Universe to the mage and likeness of those languages, images of the whole, they will therefore copycat with slight variations, in the being:

Single, ∞ 5D Universe <≈ Ternary Languages of perception ≈> Spe ‹ST›Tiƒ super organisms.

In the graph, the duality of back and forth order: in the right side, the first flow of information shrinks the Universe through a language into a mapping of the Universe: ø-mind x ∞ Universe = world.

Yet minds are not only mathematical mirrors, as physicists think, because that is the language they use to describe external motions in space, but any language able to mirror through the common Universal syntax:

Subject (still mind) < operandi-action> object (entropic energy of the being)

Then the mind mirror will establish a second process of order (left image: 3->1->2), more subtle, but equally creative, reordering a small part of the physical world, the finite vital territory of the being, making it to its image and likeness, as a vital space in which perform its actions of existence, and survival tending to maintain and reproduce its inner being.

How large and complex is this order, and territory might vary, from what we might call the essential monads, immortal in its simple pure apperception with minimal vital territory to order and construct, and hence far less prone to errors, and longer in its life existence, which are the atoms that seem to live eternally, as they just order a very small ‘territory’; to the largest ordering beings, which are black holes that order whole galaxies, and we shall see in fact also live a relative eternity because from its point of view, its territory, the galaxy is just an atomic world on the ∆+4 scale, and any system does in fact only apperceives an ∆±1 relative space-time around its singularity.

Epistemology and Truth: =Dimensional Stiences, theories and minds.

The first obvious question of this post on mind stiences is why mind stiences do not ‘exi=st, that is we do not study mind ‘exist¡ences’, as real beings; as we do with physical biological and social systems and its ∃xistential functions.

Now, it is obvious that stience studies only what ∃xists, ‘functions of existence’. So a huge part of any system is to have a mind which understands the game of existence and allows the system to play it and survive.

Thus what physicists likely would deny we consider a tenant of truth: The UNIVERSE IS FILLED WITH MAXWELLIAN DEMONS ORDERING REALITY.

HOW THEY DO IT? With different ‘intelligences, which however share an evolutionary ‘survival function’ embed in all of them, Œ, the organic function of existence, the strategy of survival we call the LEGO game of the Universe, the Generator game of super organisms.

This is what the Universe does: Superorganisms departing from ∆-1 finitesimal dust of space and time, integrated in time and space through networks which all finally create superoganisms.

The mind is NOT that game though, it is a different less vital thing – a still mapping of reality and algorithms of survival, action-oriented attached to the mapping.

The answer is that present reality is made of actions of entropy and time, which therefore need both to exist, but mind stiences are pure information, and its existence. if real, would form the substrata of all other scales. But in the existence we give it to this sheet of information is provided forcefully by the author’s mind with a minimal bias…So we do NOT talk of mental existences as we talk of astrophysical, biological or sociological systems whose functions of existence are obviously real.

WE MUST REMEMBER THIS: STIENCE IS ONLY CONCERN WITH WHAT EXISTS AND IS REAL (EINSTEIN).

So departing from this law, the function of existence

Γ. ∃xi≈sT

AND ALL its symmetries and generators is the origin seed of information that gives birth when ‘restricted’ by the limits of energy – boundaries of the problem, to a limited number of integral space and time solutions.

The finding of integrals thus means the finding of solutions in the emergence of a larger scale of a function of existence.

How we consider a function? Through its motions of time, which give us functions with often just 3+0 variables, to give us a complete description of such motions. For the simplest informative space-time, that of the Euclidean + time duration 4D holographic Universe humans observe, it is easy to craft a simple bidimensional language to translate its actions:

energy

So with geometry and the analytic geometry and algebra, we can describe the same game we have been describing here in conceptual terms. It follows that the mathematical language will follow in its algebra, just translations to the mathematical language of the main laws and isomorphisms of 5D space-time.

Mind languages are virtually infinitely energetically 0.

Now mind languages are stiences with no existence in the pure realm of static information, as ‘blocks o time’ that will imprint infinitely different herds of social numbers, converting dust of space-time into super organisms.

So they are potentially infinite in games, but in fact zeroes of pure seed of information with no motion, potential lethargic till the right energy informs itself with the seed.

What matters though is did: languages are inflationary potential futures which only exist for a huge range of parallel Universes in which a similar game could be played. Normally thus reality is smaller than the potential stories of the language. Languages of information are inflationary.

Thus Einstein  said to poincare i know when maths are truth (logically consistent) but not when they are real.

In the graph, the syntax of all languages can be reduced to dual and ternary structures that reflect the ternary elements of the fractal generator, Spe<St>Tiƒ. Thus we can consider all languages mirrors of the generator, which in turn species use to order and project its imagination’, reproducing those mirrors through those languages into actions that mold the future of reality. Mind stiences therefore are essential to the way the Universe creates. The graph shows how a minimum of two parameters to represent entropy and information can create a mapping of reality, even though ternary languages are more precise. In the right the human verbal, temporal language and mathematical, spatial one, can be reduced to ternary dimensions (height-information, width-reproduction, length-entropy), ternary topologies, ternary symbols G(spe) <action operandi>T(ƒ) and ternary sentences. Above a simple mathematical statement that relates a spatial function, D, and a temporal one, written BOTH in cyclical 1/ƒ=T and lineal time, below a scheme of the Universal grammar of all systems made of Names (informative element), verbs (actions) and Objects (energy of the Name). Both suffice for a whole mapping of reality.

All what exists is motion, but we can perceive it as still space, as form, thus motion and form is what exists, and yet we cannot distinguish them by the Galilean relativity paradox. Thus we are made of motions, the real part, and forms the imaginary one. And so together we are complex functions of existence, of a formalism, represented by Non-Aristotelian non-Euclidean Non-AE, Non-Æ=i-logic geometry…

What is truth? The maximal information about a being, expressed in a language of the mind with the minimal distortion of the geometric forms in space and causal chains in time of an ST-event.

Now, the Universe is a sum of motions through the 5th dimension, as only when motion exists we need to define a space (the form that moves) and time (motion). And so epistemology is the knowledge about a being of the maximal information about its ST events, which is all, what exists, of truth 1. The language will reduce that truth 1 to a 2-manifold mental mapping of it.

As such truth requires both a proper syntax of reality provided by cyclical time fractal space and the 5th dimension, and a proper semantics of experimental data extracted from reality.

What is then the minimal unit of ‘knowledge’ that allows a language to portrait reality? The answer is duality. Systems can extract the ‘theoretical minimum to survive, from reality and they can do so, if they have a language that can mirror 2 variables, entropy and information.

So you can create a Universe with dual | o, black and white colours, fields of entropy and particles. But better still is to have a ternary language, for which the GENERATOR is the best syntactic model.

Minds and languages.

What languages then matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. For example:

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

red colors (spatial entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (temporal information) for animal visual languages

F(x):time-like parameter < (operandi: action) > G(x): space-like parameter, which defines mathematical equations and its simpler Boolean algebra which in computers reduces all to 0 and | truth or false, ±, and its combined gates.

But language also create the Universe, they not only reflect it, but minds which store languages as identities with beings of reality use them as templates for creation. So mind languages are both mirrors that focus reality and emitters of information, which they enlarge and imprint in reality. It is this dual action-reaction of mind languages, what makes it so beautiful to observe and understand and the core bottom of the artistic languages of the human mind we shall study here (music, painting being the most pure temporal and bidimensional-spatial forms).

Let us then summarise first duality and its languages and then the ternary languages, more sophisticated, proper of modern man, ternary verbal languages and mathematical equations.

THE FIRST SYNTAX: Duality in the history of knowledge.

In the verbal age of Science, when men used words to describe the Universe, philosophers called the 2 arrows, Yang-Entropy, synonymous of male forms (since men have a lot of Entropy, constantly move, control space and have lineal forms) and yin, related to cyclical time and its patterns of information, which became the female principle (since women are more perceptive, informative, memorial, ordered, made of cyclical curves). Taoists said that yin=form, in/form/ation, which they represented with cycles or fractal lines, – -, and yang=Entropy, which they represented with a continuous line, ___, combine into yin-yang forms, and further on into ternary sets, which they represented with trigrams (I Ching), giving birth to all the possible forms and events of the Universe. In Hinduism the ‘wills of time’ were represented by Shiva, God of death and Entropy vs. Vishnu, God of life and creation.

Duality has always been present in philosophy. Parmenides proved beyond logic fault that from one only one could be created, while 2 could combine themselves into infinite new forms. Heraclites said that 2 elements are necessary to generate by iteration and combination all other forms of the Universe. On the other hand, dialectic philosophers, from Heraclites to Hegel, considered that from a thesis and an antithesis arise all synthetic forms.

– In the modern age, when mankind switched from verbal, temporal languages to mathematical, spatial numbers, in order to describe with higher accuracy the Universe in Space, scientists stressed that formal, geometrical duality of reality. Desargues, a French mathematician, found in the XVII century that all curves and functions could be extracted from the combination of 2 Generator forms, a cycle and a line (that together create a cone, from where those curves, called conics, could be extracted).

The father of Western Science, Descartes, also said that the Universe was ultimately made of ‘res extensa’ (lineal space represented by his Cartesian graph) and vortices of form (charges and masses), similar to time clocks. String Theorists reached the same conclusion in modern science, postulating that all particles are made of lineal and cyclical strings, described by the Beta function. And Einstein in his General Relativity Theory deduced that the Universe was a flat surface of energetic, spatial forces that time curved into cyclical masses, the 2 fractal units of the physical Cosmos. Thus, time and space are geometrical shapes closely related to each other, since cycles of Informative Time bend any plane of Energetic Space, creating the geometrical duality of the physical world. Moreover, those 2 geometries are irreducible to monism, as the ancient problem of squaring the cycle proves.

– In any logic language 2 symbols suffice to represent any being of the Universe. All languages have a syntax based in 2 parameters, one of information and one of relative Entropy that combine through a 3rd active principle, an operandi or verb, that merges them. We talk of a ternary Universal Grammar:

A (Informative subject) <Operandi/verb> B (Entropy/object)

The ternary, Universal grammar applies to all languages able to represent the systems of reality: from the code of colors (red that represents Entropy; blue, the color of information and green, the reproductive color) to verbal languages, where an informative subject relates to an object through an exchange of Entropy and information, described by a verb, shaping the genetic structure of all human languages 8. It also happens in mathematics, where f(x)= g(y) is the universal equation that summarizes all the others.

– Computer Logic is also based in 2 elements: the symbols of the cycle and the line, 0 and |, related by an algorithm. Those digital symbols are not ordered in space as geometric elements, but sequentially, in time, since logic is a time language. Yet they can model any mathematical, spatial relationship, showing the primacy of time over space.

– In Physics, cyclical and lineal movement, gravitational vortices and lineal electromagnetism, cyclical particles and lineal forces, are the only 2 shapes necessary to explain the material Universe. And such duality is irreducible to monism, as the failure of all Unification Theories of forces show.

– If we grow in scale into the biological world, the morphological invariance of both substances is maintained: Time has evolved masses of undifferentiated cells into complex living organisms, which are also made of cyclical heads that store and process Informative Time and lineal limbs of Entropy. Another less pronounced Entropy/information duality is between reproductive body, which absorbs Entropy to reproduce the cycles of the organism and delivers part of it to the limbs and the informative head:

The head is a cyclical, spherical form, and so are the informative senses, all of which accumulate in the head. The head is ‘small’, ‘perceptive’, informative. It sits on top of the body, on the dimension of height. It is ‘broken, discontinuous’ (as it holds more cellular, neuronal parts that the rest of the body’). The head is hierarchical and dominates the body, imposing its directions of future as they guide their body towards Entropy and information fields. The head is still. It is in metaphysical terms, the Aristotelian, unmoved ‘relative God’ that controls the movements of the body.

Its senses also show the same duality: the main informative senses are broken in dual elements (left, right eyes and ears) – while the energetic sense, the mouth that feeds on Entropy is ‘bigger’ and continuous (a single one). The eyes, the most perfect of those senses are in fact a perfect sphere. And they process ‘bidimensional information’ (which latter both eyes mix to create the illusion of 3-dimensionality).

On the other hand the body is a plane, dominant in lineal or elliptic, ‘reproductive’ forms, bigger than the head, on the bottom of the body-head system. The body moves and processes Entropy. It has however hardly any sensorial elements, as it gets the information from the body. Its detached elements, the limbs are even more lineal, and only become broken, discontinuous on the fingers, which are the sub-elements that process information. Within the body, the most lineal elements are those who process directly Entropy: the guts and the lungs (in the brain the cerebellum that controls movement is also a lineal network of neurons that would extend over a meter in length).

Biological dual systems are irreducible to monism, since a headless organism cannot process information and survive. Even in the social, mental scale of existence, men have always represented Entropy with lineal arrows of expansive movement, and time with cyclical clocks of rotating, imploding movement. Thus in our plane of space/time, we find 2 invariant elements, formally homologous to the energetic line/movement and the cyclical, temporal rotating forms we have found in all other scales.

– Finally, in Economics, machines and lineal weapons of metal that release Entropy are valued by cyclical bits of metal-information (money), ‘the brain of the economy’, through prices, in a dual, physical and financial economic structure so far irreducible to monism, as the failure of planned economies proved. And when we consider Entropy and information – machines that men create to enhance their own Entropy and information capacities – they maintain the invariant forms of Entropy and information: spherical cameras are informative, and energetic, moving machines are lineal planes.

Thus, the only logic able to explain all forms and species of the Universe is a self-generating dualism, caused by the existence of 2 fundamental invariant, geometrical shapes of Entropy and information that repeat and emerge in every scale of space/time of the Universe – the lineal wave of Entropy or shortest movement between 2 points and the cycle, rotating spin or sphere, which stores the maximal volume of information in a minimal volume. They are the most perfect, inverse shapes of Entropy and information, which repeat in all the species of the Universe:

– All systems that create inner form, information, from DNA nuclei to eyes to brains have similar cyclical or spherical forms because a sphere stores the maximal amount of information in minimal space. And their function is creative, in/form/ative.

– On the other hand, all moving bodies that process Entropy are lineal, because a line is the fastest, shortest distance between 2 points. So fast felines, F1 cars, light beams and rockets are all lineal in form. Further on, the function of systems that absorb Entropy is often destructive: for example, felines are predators that erase the information of its preys and missiles are weapons that erase human beings.

– While in any scale of reality, complex, ‘organic systems’ combine both forms into TI=k=Se balanced systems. So the 2 commonest forms of Natural fractals are the tree, with an informative head sitting on top of a line/limb of Entropy and/or reproductive cycle (from virus to sperm, from humans to plants, from robots to missiles); and the spiral, which can easily mutate between a cyclical state, coiling onto itself and a lineal, moving state, as an uncoiled snake (from particles that become waves, to worms, to galaxies that mutate from bars into spirals). Dual organic systems are everywhere: informative particles and fields of Entropy create physical beings, while all biologic species are made with reproductive bodies and informative heads.

Recap: The 2 simplest arrows of time, creation of Entropy and information have opposite properties: From a logic perspective, Entropy and information have a paradoxical, dual, causality: E<=>I, which means to create one we must destroy the other. Thus all events are dual: a creation means a parallel destruction event.

Duality & Complexity: Simple and Complex Time arrows

The best-known science to come out of that congress was cybernetics in which computer science is based, because of the practical uses it has today in the age of information. Yet the most important sciences for pure knowledge were two less-known disciplines, Duality and Complexity:

– Duality studies the Universe with the 2 ‘simplex’ arrows of time, Entropy and in/form/ation16.

Scientific Duality has important precedents in Eastern cultures. In Taoism yin translates as information and yang as Entropy, and the Universe is explained with those 2 elements. In Europe Leibniz introduced Taoism to the West, establishing it as the foundation of German philosophy. There, Hegel translated philosophically Duality into Dialectics – the concept that from a thesis (the equivalent of Entropy) and an antithesis (the equivalent of information, with inverse properties to those of Entropy) a synthesis arises, by merging both in ‘Complementary, dual systems’.

So even if Duality was not understood scientifically till Systems Sciences filled it with scientific data, it has been always a ‘Theory of It All’, in the tradition of religions and philosophy. This is logic – since humans have understood Duality with different degrees of detail and different jargons by the mere fact that they observe a dualist Universe.

What modern Duality has done is to upgrade those concepts with the discoveries of mathematical, biological and physical isomorphisms, which show the Universe as a Fractal System of Entropy and information. In that regard, the central concept of modern duality is also the Principle of Complementarity, which states that all systems in the Universe are constructed with an energetic and informative element, whose geometrical properties and functions are self-similar:

Energetic systems store Entropy and move. They occupy more space and are lineal (the shortest distance between two points)

Informative systems store and gauge information. Thus they occupy less space and tend to be cyclical (the form that stores more information per unit of volume).

This dual complementarity is the main Law of quantum physics (principle of complementarity between a lineal field of Entropy and a cyclical, particle of Information). It is the principle that explains the structure of all living organisms (from animals with cyclical heads and lineal limbs; to plants with energetic trunks and planar leaves, which store and process Entropy, and quantized, fractal roots that absorb chemical information; to cells with a central nucleus that stores the DNA/RNA information of the system). It explains biological reproduction (since males have lineal limbs, specialized in the collection of Entropy and females, with curved bodies, reproduce our information). It is the principle of Computer science, based in the duality of symbols, 0 and |.

The Universe has two inverse ways of creating reality: it creates either Entropy by erasing form, as when a quasar explodes, E=Mc2, expelling ‘dark Entropy’ and flows of expansive space; or when any being dies, dissolving its form.

Or it creates information by warping Entropy, as when Entropy becomes mass, M=E/c2 (in fact the first equation that Einstein found), since ‘Time bends (vacuum) space into mass’ (Einstein) or ‘Time evolves the form of beings’ (Darwin). And so all what exists fluctuates between the arrow of information, of life, of creation of particles with form, E->I, and the arrow of death, of erasing of form into Entropy, of big-bangs, I->E.

Both together, in their transformations, E<=>I, generate the cycles of creation of form (life cycles) and destruction (death cycles), which define the existence of its parts.

Thus Duality advances a step further in the great insights of Eastern and German Philosophy, opening new avenues of thought and explaining the why of many phenomena that the use of the single arrow of quantum physics cannot resolve.

– But Duality only studies simultaneously the Entropy and form of what we call a ‘plane of existence’, or ‘scale of the fractal Universe’ (Religious/philosophical vs. mathematical jargons). And when we consider reality, it is obvious that the Universe is structured in ‘layers’ of entities of growing size and complexity – from particles to atoms to molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planetary systems and galaxies.

In each of those layers we find Dual species: quarks of massive information and electrons of energetic space, which form atoms; Nitrogen rings that store information and phosphate chains, which form DNA molecules; Nuclei that store information and cellular bodies that store Entropy; heads of information and bodies of Entropy; audiovisual networks of information and economic networks that distribute Entropy, forming together nations. And this pattern of social evolution and emergence into new, more complex systems that create a bigger plane of existence also occurs in physical space, as molecules become planets and stars that organize themselves into galaxies.

So we must add to the 2 Simple arrows of time, Entropy and information, 2 Complex arrows of time: the creation of self-similar species or reproduction and the social organization of those self-similar, cellular species into networks and more complex systems.

And we find those 2 universal arrows in both, physical and biological systems. Even the simplest particles of the Universe, quarks and electrons reproduce into new quarks and electrons when they absorb Entropy, as biological beings do, and organize themselves into complex cellular systems in atoms that have many quarks and electrons. In that regard, Complexity studies how reality is created by multiple layers of reality, which from the simplest strings and particles evolve into molecules, cells, organisms, planets, stars and galaxies of increasing size and complexity.

So the arrows of Entropy and form are not enough to understand the complex Universe, which exists through a series of ‘planes of increasing complexity and self-organization’, starting from the first theoretical duality of ‘lineal strings and cyclical strings’, till arriving to the final duality of black holes of gravitational information and stars of electromagnetic Entropy (Galactic duality).

Such networks gather an enormous number of individual Entropy and information cycles/cells of space-time into a single whole or social organism deployed across multiple planes of space-time. The study of those scalar, network structures is the field of Complexity Theory, the sub discipline of System Sciences, which departing from Duality, analyzes how lines and cycles of Entropy and information reproduce, evolve, self-organize and emerge as a bigger system, in a ‘higher’, ever more complex space -time plane, creating in this manner complex systems, made of simpler, ‘cellular parts’.

Thus Systems sciences require a second discipline, besides Duality, to study complex systems and their self-organization thanks to the arrows of reproduction and social evolution, which create networks of Entropy and information that become wholes, units themselves of a new plane of existence:

System sciences: Duality (analyzes how the beats of Entropy & information, E<=>I, create the future) +

Complexity (studies how complex, reproductive, exo & eusocial S exo, events create the future).

Thus Complexity studies the 2 ‘complex’ arrows of time, derived from the combinations of Entropy and form, exI, or ‘reproduction’, which creates self-similar ‘cellular beings’ in a given plane or scale of reality and ‘social evolution’, which creates complex, tight networks made of those reproduced exo parts, that become together a single unit of a new, higher, bigger, more complex plane of existence.

Those 2 ‘complex’ arrows of time derived from the Simplex ones (Entropy and form), create the 4 ‘dimensions’ or ‘arrows’ of time needed to explain the Universe, and its understanding through the formalism of the Generator Equation of Multiple Spaces-Times, SE xti, represents an enormous leap for all sciences, which prior to the Systemic Paradigm worked only with the arrow of entropy and Entropy proper of XIX century physics.

We ad now to that ‘arrow of Entropy’, the ‘canvas’, the paint – the information in which that Entropy transforms itself, and the painter, since we contend that the finality of the Universe, the ultimate arrow of ‘future time’ is the creation of social organisms through the use of a common language of information – hence the creation of history, the superorganism of mankind, the most complex form of the Universe. We prove all this with the experimental method and the logic and mathematical formalisms derived from the generator equation, , whose symbols define the 4 main arrows of time:

e or Se, which is the symbol of spatial Entropy, the Entropy-motion, which is stored in vacuum space, from where all ‘forms’ of information are created.

I or Ti, temporal information, which is the dominant arrow of future, as time bends Entropy, trans/forming it into particles and ‘forms’ of information.

E x i is the formalism of reproduction. Since all systems reproduce their reproductive bodies/fields and informative particles/heads and the networks, X, that relate both systems.

Se x Ti describes the Social evolution of self-similar cells, into herds and organisms.

Thus the Generator Equation formalizes the main cycles, isomorphisms and events generated by the principle, ‘Entropy never dies but transforms itself into information’, which applies to any form or motion, in any scale of reality. Since the generator equation of the fractal Universe is just a complex expansion of the main equation of classic science, ‘Entropy never dies but transforms itself’, to include information. Yet when those arrows of time develop all its ‘repetitions’, feed-back iterations and combinations, as it does a simple fractal generator, like the Mandelbrot fractal, all the possible cyclical events/forms of transformation of Entropy into information appear in the Universe. In that sense, the study of the generator, fractal equation of the Universe could be to XXI century science, what the study of the final equation of Entropy, the arrow of time studied by physicists, E=Mc2, was to XX century science. Yet instead of generating pure Entropy as the equation of entropy has done, the fractal generator creates life, which makes its study much more rewarding for mankind, – a life form.

Recap: A true Theory of Unification, as systems science is, should explain all what exists, including humans – why we are here, our role in the Universe, what truly matters to mankind. This is what System sciences do by using the 4 main arrows of time. Since all Space-time beings are causal networks of cyclical time knots, created by multiple chains of organic, e<=>i cycles, and its complex combinations, reproduction and social evolution, where each ‘time arrow event’ becomes a flow of Entropy and information that converges into the space-time of the knot. Those knots can be formalized with cyclical, fractal space-time parameters in terms of frequencies and dimensions.

Such perception of the World through Time Arrows was natural to Eastern philosophy. System Sciences and its 2 main disciplines, Duality and complexity study those Time Arrows with the scientific method.

Entropy and information arrows: transfer of motion and form between place of cyclical existence.

We mean by entropy, motion transferred between planes, thus Entropy is spatial transfer between i-scales; that is, displacement in space caused by another i-plane, usually a force of the larger S-planes of existence.

When we see those motions together, ∑E=S, we observe the space-vacuum of the Universe.

The sum of all motions, simplified by the eye-mind as a continuous, static extension creates our perception of space.

And we mean by information, dimensional, cyclical form, when transferred also from different scales, from the particle of an i+n plane to the i+n-1 plane of force.

For example, when an electron emits a form and the form imprints and reproduces along the lower plane of forces, information is reproduced.

Reproduction of forma and information are thus similar concepts.

Further on, form is often the sum in time or in space of multiple time cycles. Thus the 3 concepts, form, time and information are intimately related, and we will go deeper in those concepts as we go deeper in details of iST. Enough to say that we represent To and Se, as Temporal information, and Spatial energy, to simplify and widen our analysis of isomorphic laws that apply to the 3 concepts: Space=motion (static, moving perception) ≈ energy (similar but not equal since energy transfers between scales) and we write To, to signify Time cycles = Form (moving, cyclical perception) ≈ (similar to) Information.

The key to understand energy and information is precisely the understanding of how two similar forms communicate energy and information between them by ’emitting’ usually a wave or particle of a lower scale, i-1 (spatial cardinal scale), where it will move and be absorbed by another similar particle evolving the i-1 system into a collapsed cell of the i-particle that receives the communication.

Thus for example:

i-Fermion < i-1 Boson with energy and information > i-Fermion

Is the fundamental equation of quantum physics which implies a transfer of energy and information between two i-fermions by means of a boson of a lower scale, which will collapse when reaching the i-fermion.

In our mechanical scale, we do produce Energy which is stored in a larger, formal system. And the system is destroyed and lowered in scale:

In the case of E=Mc2, the energy stored in the i+n mass becomes radiation, lowering its scale. In most systems, energy is released by the ‘destruction’ of the system that stores it back into lower scales of organisation, as an entropic, death process.

In most of those cases, then energy, is upgraded of scale, as it becomes ‘momentum’, which is its ‘derivative’ respect to speed, 1/mv²∂v=mv= momentum which is transferred back to the other system as motion.

And this connects with other fundamental themes of iST: the understanding of fundamental operandi of mathematics such as derivatives which is normally an emergence of an STi-1 scale upwards, to an scale with lesser form and more motion. As in the 3 derivatives of ‘space’ (form) into speed (motion) into acceleration (maximal motion) and viceversa, the integration of motion-energy into form.

All those fascinating relationships between mathematical operandi, classic magnitudes of science and the laws of i-planes of cyclical time, are the ultimate whys of the Universe, and bring us back again to our narrative of Leibniz, the discover of calculus.

What is information? The inverse of energy, in as much as it is a process that transfers mostly form, and so tends to upgrade from scales, as when genes imprint a human being of the upper scale, even if often the procedure of transfer of energy and information in combined waves is the same. Yet when information is transferred, the wave does loose energy but maintains the information without change, and we can classify waves by their different carrying of energy and information.

Further on, form is not perceived, time cycles do NOT communicate unless a reproductive wave of information appears. Hence the 3 concepts are intimately related.

Now, what we call absolute form or absolute time are the sum of all the cycles of time and informations of the Universe.

And this sum of all cyclical forms-in-action, in-form-ations, which our mind perceives as cycles of clock-time, creates relational, ‘fractal’ time, also defined first by Leibniz, one of the fathers of the 4th paradigm. Energy without motion or form without energy is not perceivable. Thus, systems to exist need a minimal quantity of both or they cease to exist – they die. Or as Taoist, the closest, classic philosophy to this book put it: ‘All yin-information has a drop of yang-Energy; all Yang has a drop of yin’.

Further on, because all systems respond to the same laws, we can recognize the shapes of a network dominant in energy by its form that will be lineal, planar, extended in space, as the line is the shortest distance between two points; hence the shape with more motion. And we can recognize the shapes of information because they are smaller in space, broken and cyclical, as the cycle or sphere is the shape that stores more form in lesser space; hence the perfect form of information.

So DNA nuclei, particles, heads and coins of money, made of gold, the best informative atom of the Universe, are cyclical and small. While fields of forces, moving bodies and weapons, made of iron, the most energetic atom of the Universe, are lineal and big. Finally, real physical, biological and mechanical systems are those who transform back and forth energy and information, between their two poles: E<=>O.

It follows also that cyclical information, frequency and time cycles are related. On the other side, expansive energy, motion and space, which stores energy in the vacuum are also related. So energy is fractal space and information fractal time – facts that will allow to fusion the jargon of many sciences in this volume of the series dedicated to the detailed description of physical systems and the 3rd volume dedicated to biological and sociological systems (the superorganisms of history and economics).

Thus the blog analyses the ‘3’ BUILDING STRUCTURE OF REALITY’, Space, Time and Planes of existence.

Since reality STARTS as SIMPLE SPACE, WHICH BECOME CYCLES OF TIMES (lineal strings and cyclical strings of time in the lowest possible scale) and then grows in complexity through i-planes of scientific species, guided by the metrics of the 5th dimension, which can be seen in structural terms, in fixed space as i±4=SxT or in dynamic terms, in terms of the actions of its organisms that try to maximise its existence, increasing its energy its information, reproducing and evolving socially, ∆SeXTo.

And so guided by those laws systems grow into Societies and super organisms, through the planes of the Universe, all of them following 3 sets of laws derived from those metrics, and its dimensional elements, space time and planes of existence: The isomorphism of its topological spatial organic parts, its time ages and its actions across those multiple planes.

To do though a better detailed analysis of those planes, we subdivide the 3 main isomorphisms of spatial topologies time ages and plane actions in 10 isomorphisms. And then study with them all the planes of reality, from Forces to Atoms and Molecules (which form the first ‘super organism’, the atom), through states of matter, geological formations and celestial bodies (which form the 2nd super organism, a cosmic body), through stars, galaxies and Universes, (which form the 3rd fundamental super organism of physical matter, the galaxy), and its ‘biological varieties.

Some basic morphologies of temporal Entropy.

Some languages are closer to reality than others, which are more synoptic and subjective to the observer. None is as close to reality as topology, hence we can talk almost of reality in topological formal=functional terms. Then we can say the ‘syntax’ of topology becomes the syntax of reality, made of lines of entropy, cycles of information and its hyperbolic combinations, body-waves.

We can then consider for each science and plane of existence some basic forms, which imitate the morphology of Entropy and information; and therefore are very common in the Universe:

– Lines: Entropy element. I.e.: Swords, limbs, rays.

– Planes: Social group of lines. I.e.: Stellar planes, solar planes, mobile platforms.

– Cycles: Informative unit. I.e.: coins, cameras,

– Spheres: Social groups of informative cycles. I.e. animal heads with a smallish sphere – the eye, the center that processes the biggest quantity of information – and a bigger sphere, the brain also specialized in handling information.

Those forms are the commonest of the Universe. Yet those elements tend to be complementary parts of an organic system. So they give birth to a 3rd element, whose form combines both, the reproductive body, which is ellipsoidal or become combined giving birth to the commonest systems with both, a lineal and a spherical part:

– Trees, combinations dominant in Entropy: They have a lineal trunk, with 2 fractal ends, one specialized in Entropy absorption (planar leaves); and the other, a smaller ‘head’ – a network of broken roots that absorb the chemical elements of the system.

– Spirals, where the dominant part is information. They often fluctuate between a lineal and a cyclical state. When the spiral cycles inwards, it is transforming Entropy into information. When the spiral opens its arms it is expelling Entropy, often for movement purposes. So the RNA, the worm or the snake coils to sleep and uncoils to move. Sometimes spirals have 2 elements: a central zone of maximal information (nucleus), and an external zone of maximal Entropy (lineal body). Such is the case of spermatozoids or spiral galaxies with a central black hole of gravitational information and 2 arms of energetic stars.

Finally we can talk of Social groups that gather those ‘non-Euclidean points’ in networks of Entropy and information that repeat the same forms in a bigger scale. The simpler of those social groups acquire 3 morphologies of Entropy, information or its combination:

– Rings. Informative Disks and spheres gather into rings when they come together as groups. So happens with molecules such as the carbon benzene; with groups of men commenting on any type of information, from informative money (stock-market rings), to social parties; to religious circles (Muslims, Indians), in search of the perception of the network of mind, called God.

– Strings: Energetic, lineal systems made with rings or points tied one after another in a queue.

– Coiled Springs: Balanced forms that combine individual elements dominant in Entropy and elements dominant in information. They often tie a series of spirals through a social dimension developed in the Z coordinates. The best-known case is the DNA spiral – an association of informative rings called Nucleic Acids, joined by a lineal chain of energetic sugars and Phosphoric acids.

Those simple forms, repeated and combined ad infinitum, allow the creation of very complex macro-organic systems made of micro-organic systems.

For example, in physics and biology, orbitals and bacteria repeat once and again those forms:

So there are 3 basic species of social bacteria, called coccus, bacillus and spirillus. Where, Spirillus are Spiral forms; Bacillus are Trees and coccus are cyclical forms.

While the electronic orbitals that turn around the nucleus of an atom are either:

S orbitals, which are spheres. Or P orbitals, which are lineal forms…that gather in social molecules repeating again the two basic shapes of information and Entropy:

p orbitals, which are cycles. Or s orbitals, which are Trees.

And so we can keep building new scales of forms, combination of those simplex forms, perfectly suited for their functions: Lines and spheres are perfect forms of Entropy and information, and spirals and ellipses are the perfect reproductive forms that combine both.

Temporal in-form-ation, like its name says, is a measure of inner form, which we perceive when there are discontinuities in a certain bidimensional surface – a clock, a page, a computer screen – either because the static form is broken into informative patterns (–) or its motions makes a sudden peak (>), bouncing in an action-reaction cycle. Universal entities are constantly generating informative dimensions or erasing them back into extended space, with lesser form. Imagine a hand, in mythic terms the hand of God, wrinkling a paper, the ultimate Entropy of vacuum space, till it crunches into pure cyclical form without motion – to explode again in a big bang of Entropy that erases information. Such is the universal rhythm that happens in all the parts and entities of reality.

The interaction of the arrow of expansive, lineal, spatial, Entropy, described by Thermodynamics and the clock-like arrow of cyclical information, caused by gravitation in physical space of by the fractal geometry of any life process that generates information in Biology, defines the main beat/cycle of the Universe, its fundamental particle: a system of space-time, constantly absorbing Entropy from its environment, creating and destroying form, expanding and imploding.

Look at the cycles of |>0 existence: legs opening and closing; eyes winking; mouths opening and closing on the Entropy we re=form; beats of hearts; wings of birds; day and night; Entropy stars with expansive electromagnetism and formative, gravitational black holes; big-bangs and big-crunches; bodies and minds; hardware and software; males and females; yang and yin that create Existences. Since all dual, complementary entities follow the essential beat of existence, merging together their Entropy and form, e x i, to reproduce and maintain the immortality of their complex ternary system, which is the ultimate ‘reality’ the Universe maintains ‘ad eternal’. The simple fact that species, which do not reproduce exhaust their Entropy and end their cycles, becoming extinct explains the overwhelming presence of reproductive events in all systems of the universe. Since all is motion reproduction exists by the mere fact that a motion is constantly reproducing its path. All what we see are paths, trajectories of entities in search of Entropy and information to reproduce themselves. The how of those paths and reactions is what scientists study in detail. Their whys is what a philosophy of science aims to provide.

Recap. From a geometric perspective both arrows have inverse forms: Entropy expands and creates formless space. Yet space has lineal shape, since the line fills the maximal distance with minimal volume. While information implodes, creating cyclical forms, ‘clocks of time’ that store the maximal quantity of information in lesser space.

First we analyzed its ultimate substances:

Lineal Entropic Space, perceived as motion, E, or as a space, in a series of fixed’ scales of spatial size and form, (Se). And we make more precise definitions of ‘pure space with steady speeds’, S, and its beginning of merging with forms of information (momentum and energy, which add vortices of accelerated gravitational forces, aka masses to the mix).

And cyclical, time-clocks also perceived as rotary Motion, T, or as Forms of information, in the dimension of height, To, or T ° if we want to stress the ‘height dimension’ of form, of in-form-ation. And we also defined more precisely information, where pure To, temporal clocks of form add the wave-displacement or motion to create an sTo form, which still is dominant in form, as waves maintain their form while their energy-motion dissipates.

So we accept this simplification and talk of spatial entropy and temporal form and study its inverse properties according to the metrics of the 5th dimension.

Since in practical terms, as we exist in present, through present actions, a combination of past ‘—motions’ and future form, all what we study in fact are energetic/informative combinations of those 2 pure motions.

The perfect cycle does not really exist. Pi is an irrational number and orbits are ellipses with some length; an the perfect line does not exist, the diagonal is a √irrational number that needs some curvature to connect two other lines through the shortest straight diagonal. All yin has some yang, all motion has some energy (mass-particle that moves), all form has some information (translation). And that which is with no form, or infinite gravitational non-local motion is not visible, and that which has no imperfection in tis cynical curvature, with ‘temperature vibration’ is under 0 kelvin degrees. In other words, we do exist in a vibrational imperfect present in terms of physical concepts, we live through present actions and reproductive mixtures of energy and information.

The understanding of those 2 elements, its 3 spatial dimensions and its 3 temporal, dimensional ages, and its bidimensional, topological combinations, S, ST, Ti, entropy, energy action and format, conform the full comprehension of the i-ndividual, I-centered, most important space-time scale of any being, the one in which ‘he lives’, which we have called the ‘5th dimension’, to follow the compact analysis of classic science that studies only the Present most important dimension of time, with ‘instantaneous derivatives’, v=∂s/∂t.

Then we analyzed the combination of both, or the metrics of the 5th dimension

Nest we will analyze the systems built with them, the super organism of reality in which according to those metrics, there are always heads of information and limbs of energy of different size and speed.

The isomorphism of ‘informative heads’ and energetic/reproductive limbs and bodies HAPPENS across multiple world-planes of the 5th dimension, each one studied by a science.

In two coordinates, the height coordinates of information and the X coordinate of space-energy of the main planes of the universe. Notice that paradoxically as we become smaller in space-size upwards in information we increase our fractal information and the perfection of our ‘smooth’, superfluid orderly following of those laws.

Hence we have put on top of the pyramid in a never reached, ideal infinite infinitesimal the ‘seed’ or ‘primary’ encoded ‘non-Euclidean point, Œ, mind of the Universe which encodes all the laws of the 5th dimension and by infinite iteration gave birth to all beings. This would be if it ever existed the particle of god, NOT the higgs, but the ultimate i-logic mind of the Universe.

In the graph above we see the duality of informative smaller heads controlling lineal limbs and reproductive wave-bodies.

A precision: we often simplify bodies and limbs into a single Se system, (see the previous 2 posts for a more rigorous definition).

In strict terms, there are always 3 parts, which correspond to the 3 topologies of bidimensional membranes:

-Pure lineal, hyperbolic space-motion – limbs/fields.

-Pure cyclical, spherical informative motions, heads/particles.

-And its ‘energetic-informative combinations of yin and yang, waves and bodies, since energy is motion with a bit of form (the mass), and information is form with a bit of motion (the wave-particle displacement).

Yet since the ‘present’ body-wave, combination of past-entropic limb/fields and informative pure To forms of future is the dominant element of reality, we do write often Se≈To for the whole system, that is systems of spatial energy and temporal information in perpetual exchange ad transformation through body-waves, ≈.

This simplified graphic expression of the 5th dimension has the advantage of allowing an easier understanding of the ‘Whole Universe’ which is the super organism of all partial beings, hence with an absolute time duration and an infinite number of scales of size and hierarchical organization, whereas the ‘informative head’ is the Logic of General Systems theory – those aforementioned thoughts of God, and the ‘Body’ all its partial systems through all the scales, each one studied by a different science:

We have called the sum of all those isomorphic planes of space-time in the 5th dimension.

Since science calls the ‘4th dimension’, of Time Duration,

Further on, as science compacts the past and future cycles of beings, by extending present time along a lineal coordinates of infinite time duration, we have also extended the 5th dimension or i-scale by extending it up and down, through the metrics of scalar space-time, to encompass all the i-scales of the Universe.

This simpler analysis gave us the opportunity to study the metrics of al the world-planes of the Universe, ∆=Es x Ti, and learn a lot of general properties of scalar space-time. But the analysis of only a 4th and 5th dimension of time and isomorphic scales is limited and of little use when we analyze an specific ‘variety’ or ‘species’ of scalar space-time in detail.

The 5th dimension is a ‘compact’ version of the infinite planes of space time of the Universe, which uses the 3 ‘spatial dimensions’ and the compact dimension of Time Duration of Einstein (4th classic dimension) and the adds a compact of all the i-scales in the Universe, in a ‘fifth dimension’ of scalar depth.

In that sense the 5th dimension is the sum of all the planes of ‘social evolution’ from past to future in the Universe.

And this metrics allow travel through the scale of the 5th dimension. So thanks to those metrics species from different scales can relate to each other and transfer energy and information among them: S entropy<energy x information>Tƒorm.

And so the Universe can synchronize the species of its different scales.

Those simple examples of several different fields of inquire within the frame of the 5th dimension metrics, shows the enormous richness and capacity to resolve the ‘whys’ of all type of universal phenomena, and explain the ‘isomorphisms’ (equal laws) of all type of entities made of fractal, vital space with motions and energy and cyclical, fractal time clocks with information, of 5th dimensional metric.

Some key partial equations of Existential Algebra.

If we call the metric of the 5th dimension in philosophical terms, the ‘Function of Existence’, and write it as E x I = St (energy and information, using in this case i for information, instead of the customary o for form, equals a constant plane of space-time) we can call the study of that equation and its different variations and partial equations, ‘Existential algebra’, which becomes the mathematical foundations of an organic philosophy of the Universe, where all the previously ill-defined concepts, from the equation of the soul, to the concept of life and death, survival and extinction, can be logically and mathematically represented.

For example, one of the more difficult concepts is that of anthropomorphic Gods of eusocial love, which code in verbal thought, the laws of eusocial evolution which allow different cells=believers of a human religion, to act together and shape a community.

Thus immediately we realize that such gods can be represented with a simple equation:

Max. ∆+1. Where ∑i-ndividual human beings =ST+1, the plane of social existence or superorganism of a civilization. And within that plane or God, there will be a prophet or Max. ∆, which will receive the ‘saint spirit’, that is, the verbal coding or message of eusocial love, the DNA common to all believers that will put them together.

That is called in mystical terms the mystery of the Saint Trinity, or the act of revelation of a prophet. And so an anthropomorphic god is the subconscious collective plane of existence of mankind the super organism of human beings, expressed in the informative collective verbal language, through a common memetic code.

Those simple equations thus have much more meaning that one could ever imagine. And so the purpose of this section is to study ‘mathematically’, with algebraic equations, derived from the ‘fractal generator’ of the 5th dimension and all its world-plane of existence – the previous equation of the metrics of world-planes of space-time, and deduce from it, the general laws that apply to all sciences, forms of art, perception and religion of all the species of the universe – a task further accomplished in its details – that is, in its empirical proofs, in each of the analysis of the species of the 10 planes of existence of the universe perceived by mankind.

Conservation of momentum and dominance of information over entropy.

Now it follows from all what has been said that systems have an arrow of information and future, as energy become informed, systematically warped into a 3rd age of life. So in physical systems Einstein said that time curves the energy of space into masses, and we see all systems wrinkling with age. This is due to the fact that informative systems are ‘faster’ than slower body systems, and so the rat wins the dinosaur, the chip the machine, man the lion and the black hole devours the star. And this exhaustion of energy by the infinite fractal mind-points of information is balanced by the arrow of death or big-bang when all energy is exhausted.

As Se and To are ultimately motions, and since motion is the ultimate substance of reality, of the two types, cyclical motions (from accelerated vortices of mass, to clock times, to rotary inertia) and ‘—motions’ (from speed to acceleration, from limbs to fields), but the total angular and lineal momentum of the Universe is conserved in each of those i=ST planes of existence, it follows that life must be continued by death and explosion of energy into information.

Thus we can rewrite the principle of energy and information conservation as:

Energy and information transform each other ad eternal within 3 relative st=∆±1 plane of existence, through world cycles of life and death for all species of the Universe.

This enlarge the laws of classic sciences and explains unexplained phenomena such as beta decay, where a neutrino, a particle of the relative i-1 gravitational plane of existence of particles (hence invisible to our direct perception), ‘steals’ parts of the momentum of the particle of the i-2 atomic scale as a neutron decays. Many phenomena of quantum physics and relativity will find in that sense a better explanation when we deal with the concept of 3 planes of physical existence, the relative ∆±2 human planes of ‘matter’ where ‘mechanics’ rule, and the ∆±4 cosmic plane of gravitation and the ∆±3 planes of quantum, electromagnetic phenomena. Here we see the relativism of those planes, as mechanical, matter planes include all the life planes, which due to the higher perception of humans, close to its ‘i-self’, are further differentiated, but from the larger ‘space scale’ of the galactic physical world are irrelevant, all submitted to the action of ‘molecular matter’

Now this introduction to conservation principles is needed to consider what all systems try to achieve, to avoid death; to maintain the equation of existence in a steady state, without absorbing too much information and depleting the body-limbs of its energy, by maintaining the balance of the existential force in the point Se=Ti, ‘cheating’ with that balance the metrics of the 5th dimension, which inexorably drag the system to its old age and death reversal as motion cannot stop.

Thus systems try to convert that motion into a long lasting ‘vibration’, back and forth from future to past, into a steady present, a fascinating phenomena with infinite variations, from the long lasting back and forth vibrating AC current vs. forward DC current that looses intensity (the existential force of the currency, measure by the charge, To parameter and volume, Se), to the motions of sexual reproduction, back and forth, penis in and out (-; which reproduces a parallel clone or present form of the i-system, to the understanding of sensation, of the infinite orgasms of the Universe, as motion is associated to sensation, which we consider one of the natural properties of the two motions of reality. there is thus a program of existence, derived of the search for immortality of all species, which try to stop the metrics of the 5th dimension in its balanced point.

The equation of beauty, survival, balance, adulthood, reproduction and love.

In that regard of the many isomorphic ways to write the metrics of the 5th dimension two are of great importance.

The equation of survival of the strongest, which translates Darwinian evolution:

Max. Se x Ti->Se=Ti.

Where the species with maximal energy and Information becomes the top predator (the species with more momentum, V(s) x M(i), with stronger bodies and more intelligent minds). And this is achieved precisely when both systems, body and mind are in balance: Se=To (maximal product of a total quantity i, divided in two e x i happens when e=i).

As it defines a general mandate for all beings: to find a homeostasis or balance between their Spatial motions and energy components and its informative clocks of time, its body and mind (golden mean rule of Buddhism, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, homeostasis, steady state, balanced perception of beauty, adult age of the 3 age of life of longest duration).

Thus a tug of war takes place in existence between the metrics of the 5th dimension that allows travel through the arrow of constant growth of information, E->Ti

It is for that reason that we perceive the balance as beauty, (mind subconscious perception of the equation) that we enjoy reproduction as pleasure (body perception), that we like to move at a steady state speed that calms us vs. the anxiety of acceleration and the depressive mood of deceleration (the 3 ‘ages of a motion’, which first accelerates in its energetic youth, then keeps an inertial speed and then decelerates).

Actions of ‘motions’ and time

5D best

ENERGY INFORMATION

The Universe is made of 2 substances: spatial ‘—motions’ and informative time. We can see it with motion as ‘—motions’ and time or as fixed forms, as space and information. We can see it as a single reality, as space and time, or as a multiple quanta, as ‘—motions’ and information. We can differentiate them by form, as space and ‘—motions’ are lineal or planar surfaces and time and information are cyclical. And we can see it together into beings, the simplest of which is an action of light, SxT=k. This duality structures all beings of reality. So we are made of cyclical heads and lineal bodies. Weapons are lines that release ‘—motions’. Informative machines are cyclical, and all physical systems are made of lineal forces and cyclical particles of information.                

The Principles of reality: Space-time Duality. Ternary organs and ages. 4 åctions. ∞ Fractal Universes.

The integration of all sciences in one is the goal of General Systems Sciences or Complexity. At Macy’s the year of Einstein’s death, the highest minds of mankind came together and realized that physics had its limits and lacked despite its exhaustive understanding of ‘—motions’ and motion (as that was its purpose since its inception by Galileo) a full comprehension of information, the other element of which the simplest Universe is made.

They also realized that the mechanist view was too simple and rather theological because as Leibniz put it, needed a God that started and created the mechanism. So for the future evolution of a more comprehensive theory, they considered that all the ‘systems’ of the Universe (anything that exists), there should be at least two elements, defined by their form and function, both related to each other: ‘—motions’ or ‘—motions’ or space (any expansive motion, hence perceived as extended, planar or lineal space) and information or form or time (implosive motion, hence perceived as implosive, cyclical motion). This realization is the principle in which the 5 dimensions of the Universe are based. Since we can say as Taoists philosophers that from ‘1 comes 2, from 2 comes 3’ and add ‘from 3 comes 4, from 4 comes 5 and from 5 dimensions come all the beings of the Universe’:

  • Duality: The space-time of the Universe is made of quantum of 2 types of motions: Lineal ‘—motions’ and cycles of times, whose frequency carries the information of the universe. As proved by Planck: ∑ Sp X Tƒ =K
  • Trinity: All organic systems have a head made of cycles of times, limbs of quantum energies, combined in a body that reproduces both making this logic structure of motions to survive.
  • 5-Dimensionality: Such organisms survive by performing 5 åctions. ‘—motions’ feeding, informative perception, reproduction and social evolution as herds, ∑ and networks, ∑2=∏.
  • The orgasm mandate: Each mathematical point of view, or diffeomorphic, local entity of space-time will perceive reality from its own point of view and try to maximize its existence as a complementary system, ∑Sp X Tƒ=k, this is achieved at points S=T and max. ∑.
  • The meaning of existence. Thus all systems try to achieve Max. ∑Sp X Tƒ=k. We call this the mandate of existence: grow in spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information: ‘Grow and multiply… in balance between mind and body.’

What this meant is that all what you see is made of two type of realities |-Motion or ‘—motions’ and cyclical motion with more form or information. If you look at yourself, you head is spherical, cyclical. Your limbs are lineal and move. And in between you have a body that combines both forms and it is elliptic or an inverted cone, figures made of combining line and cycles.

Anywhere you look you will find all systems to have those 2 elements, ‘—motions’ limbs or fields in physics and cyclical heads or particles. So this is the first tenant of General Systems sciences, which describes the common isomorphisms of all systems of the Universe:

All what exists is a system made of 3 components, a field of motion, the energetic system, a head or particle that process and creates forms, the system of information.

In complexity the Universe is quantic. Space-time continuum is the sum of all those spaces or motions of ‘—motions’, of all the limbs and fields of ‘—motions’ of lineal or planar form. And time is the sum of all those cyclical motions or ‘clocks’ of all its systems.

There is not only a clock of time, our mechanical clocks, but infinite cyclical motions that happen to regulate and guide the energetic fields. So particles guide fields of ‘—motions’, and heads guide limbs of ‘—motions’.

This is the first ‘whole’ and its parts: a Universe of space and time is the whole. Its parts are all those quantic, lineal fields of ‘—motions’ and limbs and all those cyclical particles (charges, masses) and heads. The whole seems continuous and static because we integrate it in the mind’s picture. The parts seem broken and vital in motion. Both descriptions are valid. And the whole interacts with the parts.

For example, Relativity explains the whole. Quantum theory the parts, fields of ‘—motions’ and particles. And the whole and its isomorphisms influence its parts.

Organisms seem wholes, but then they are made of cells, of two types, informative brain neurons and somatic, body cells. And the whole influences its parts.

Time and space are like Leibniz – the most clear predecessor of organicism – thought of them: a sum of different ‘spaces and times’ as each entity that exists has a certain vital space or body of ‘—motions’ that lasts a certain duration of time or life. This brings a key duality, between Universal, ‘whole’ concepts (space and time) and particular parts (the energies and cycles of information of each part):

If space has motion and it is broken in vital spaces with extension, it is equivalent to a sum of energies. Thus space is made of ∑energies.

And if time is broken in multiple life cycles, and we consider each life cycle or duration of a complementary system a clock cycle of time, time is equivalent to all the cyclical forms or ‘in/form/ ations’ of the Universe. So time is the sum of all informations, all forms-in-action, all cyclical forms.

When we add all the informative cycles of all beings and all its ‘vital energies’, we obtain absolute time and space, which ultimately is an error of perception due to the use of a single mechanical clock.

Yet when we perceive, we also eliminate motion. And so we see space quiet, as we see the Earth quiet, despite moving along paths of gravitational ‘—motions’; or your skin quiet despite being made of cellular cycles. Thus we further reduce our knowledge of the parts gathered in a whole that appears as quiet space, with a few motions that truly matter to the perceiver – of preys, predators and individuals of the same species – while the rest of reality appears as a continuous space-time, often represented in a continuous Cartesian, mathematical graph. This is natural to the limits of storage of information of any perceiver, because the brain cannot hold all the fractal motions, vital spaces, time durations of the life of all beings. So it reduces information. But this has caused grave errors in human knowledge, as we believe what we see. So science tends to reductionism, considering beings things and ignoring the isomorphisms that relate all those scales.

The inverse properties of spatial ‘—motions’ and temporal information.

Tƒ fully grasp the dynamic transformations and properties of ‘—motions’ and information the most important quality is the inversion of its properties and the possibility to transform the forms of one property into the other.

Informative time, Tƒ          Vs.       Energetic Space, ΣS
Time-clocks:Information             Vs.       Space motion:Lineal ‘—motions’
Small, still                  Vs.       Large,  moving fast
Tall, Perpendicular           Vs.              Long, Parallel,

Hierarchical               Vs.                  Democratic
Bidimensional   Height             Vs.            Bidimensional, Length,

Repetition                    Vs.                   Width-Growth
Cyclical, Rotation, imploding         Vs.            Lineal, uncoiling, exploding
Informative Frequency               Vs.                           Lineal Speed
Broken form                             Vs.             Continuous, differentiable
Intelligent, perceptive           Vs.                         Strong, fast.

Social, organic, creative                   Vs.            Darwinian, destructive behavior
Future, evolved predator                 Vs.,                Past, energetic victim
Life arrow                             Vs.                      Death arrow.
Waves of space                      Vs.                     Particles of Time
Female, yin principle               Vs.               Male, yang principle
Masses, charges                   Vs.                       Forces, fields
Heads  & senses                     Vs.                       Limbs & Bodies.

This resumes in its two fundamental equations: Sp X Tƒ = K, and SP<=>Tƒ.

The constant transformation of one into another.

Despite their inversion, and this is the most important law of the Universe, ‘—motions’ and information constantly transform into each other. It is the principle of ‘conservation and transformation of ‘—motions’ back and forth into in/form/ation, forms in action’ which becomes the new fundamental law of the 4th paradigm, widening the principle of conservation of ‘—motions’:

‘All energies, trans/form constantly back and forth into information, Sp<=>Tƒ’

Thus the Universe is truly an eternal infinite of beats of ‘—motions’ warping into dimensional form, information and informations uncoiling into spatial ‘—motions’. And since both elements ‘—motions’ and temporal information have motion this is possible as they are truly just the two extreme types of topological motions of the Universe, each one associated to a series of ‘functions’ and ‘perceptions’:

‘—motions’=Extension=Space= Fast motion = Lineal, planar shapes = Pleasure = Reproduction = Death

Information=Implosion=Time=Slow motion=Cyclical ball=Pain =Communication = Evolution = Life

The infinite balances and combinations of those two fields and its forms are the essence of reality.

The five åctions of ‘—motions’ and time performed by all species.

Since all is space-time, all is ‘—motions’ and information; all is a sum of complementary entities of ‘—motions’ and information that perform 4 åctions in space-time to enhance its survival:

-’—motions’ feeding (e), information or perception of it (ï), reproduction that combines both in other surface of space-time (Sp X Tƒ) and finally social evolution, as a herd, ∑Sp X Tƒ, or as a network, ∑2=∏, which as the reader can see summons up all the other arrows.

We call the composite, reproductive and evolutionary arrows, the complex arrows.

And so we can express all in the synoptic language of science with a simple equation that we call the fractal generator of the Space-time Universe: ∑Sp X Tƒ

Since e and O are the two initial variables of reality, the program is self-evident, deduced from them and it proves itself by the experimental method (all is a complementary system of ‘—motions’ and information) and then by the logic of evolution: those 4 space-time arrows encompass and explain all what exists in space-time, and all åctions and isomorphisms of all sciences, as the are needed to survive.

Some of those sciences need some minor corrections to adapt it to the program, but most don’t; just a translation of jargons. Because of the importance of it, I believe it will start a new paradigm of science, the paradigm of ‘whys’, that would deepen the understanding of the ‘hows’ of the present age of knowledge, based in metric measure.

We shall prove that all systems are complementary systems of ‘—motions’ (æ) and information (ï), which combine both to perform ‘åctions’ in space-time (Sp X Tƒ); most of them tending to absorb further ‘—motions’ (∆Sp) and information (∆) or ‘combine’ both in new ‘åctions’ and reproductive processes (Sp X Tƒ).

We call the 2 components of all systems (Sp and Tƒ) the simplex, primary åctions-arrows of space-time, following the tradition of physical sciences; where action is their perception in space and arrow their perception in time. They are equivalent to the concept of the simplex ‘biological drives’ in biological sciences (feeding and perceiving ‘—motions’ and information); and the concept of ‘will’ or ‘greed’ – our desire for more ‘—motions’ and information, in psychology.

And we call the combination of those two primary åctions/arrows/drives/wills of ‘existence’ in space and time, the complex, secondary åctions/arrows: reproducing (Sp X Tƒ) and evolving socially, when we consider a sum of those åctions/arrows either in space or in time, ∑Sp X Tƒ (spatial analysis) or ∑ Sp <=>∏ Tƒ.

The reader will observe that since we are referring to self-similar åctions/arrows/drives/wills in all scales, we need a supra-jargon and formalism to unify them all, or else we would have to make such chains of similar concepts in each scale:

– We prefer the term reproduction to its different jargons: ‘iteration’ in mathematics, ‘decoupling’ in physics, ‘reproduction’ in biology, ‘memetic creation’ in culture, and ‘production’ in economics. And we prefer the terms ‘—motions’ instead of space and information instead of time cycles.

– We prefer the terms existence and extinction to the terms life and death; as they are inclusive of all entities of reality.

– We most often use the term åctions or time arrows instead of biological drives or will of existence. In that sense, we reduce space-time åctions to the concept of time arrows as space is just a slice of the flow of cyclical time arrows that displace and change the spatial configuration of all the beings of the Universe – defined as the sum of all the cycles of time arrows of all its existential beings. Hence time includes space within it and such concept stresses a fundamental property of the Universe: all has motion and form, ‘—motions’ and in/form/ation.

Some key discoveries of General Systems will be difficult to overcome by mainstream science, specially physics, the oldest of all sciences and hence more prone to old errors of ‘Idols of the tribe of knowledge’ (Bacon), due to the ‘memetic=believer’ nature of the human brain, which as any system of information, reproduces its bits (genes and memes =theories), generation upon generation, regardless of its logic and experimental consistence (content of truth). The main error of classic physics concerns the nature of time as ‘what a clock measures’ (Einstein), and hence as a single time-arrow of motion.

When time is any type of change and so we must define 4 arrows/åctions of space-time as the fundamental types of change of all systems. Of those 4 ‘type of universal åctions’; physics acknowledges only an arrow of time, ‘—motions’, the arrow of ‘—motions’ and motion, which is what it studies since Galileo’s analysis of the motion of weapons, and a type of clock, the mechanism constructed by him. This was all right, as long as Physics did not pretend to be the philosophy of science of all other sciences, after the importance it acquired due to the Industrial Revolution of machines, they build. So today the reductionist studies of physics concerning space-time åctions-arrows, where time has been spatialized and reduced to the arrow of energetic motion as the 4th dimension of space, have become a dogma of all sciences, which hinders their understanding and the acceptance of General Systems sciences.

This goes to the extreme that physicists do not even accept information as an arrow of time, only ‘—motions’, which is an arrow deduced from studies of heat and electromagnetic forces. Fact is in physics there are two arrows/forces on the long range, energetic, expansive light and informative, attractive gravitation. And yet, memetic imprinting is so strong that still gravitation is not accepted as the informative element of our physical Universe.

Thus physics must be redone completely and simplified as Copernicus did when the sun was put in his place, with the concept of informative forces.

A second concept of enormous importance is the Paradox of Galileo: all moves even if it seems quiet. That is, time is the substance of reality, motions that change space beings and organisms along a time cycle. And since changes have different speed and life cycles different duration, time is not only multiple but has different speeds of change.

That is why we call also General systems sciences a theory of multiple spaces and times. Thus, for the physicist who is unfamiliar with the concepts of organicism and might resist them, with its mathematical, itifying perception of reality, my advice is to think of what he is going to read in terms of ‘åctions of ‘—motions’ and time’ and the relational concepts of Leibniz, and the relativity and ‘diffeomorphic’ principles of Einstein and the Principle of Complementarity of quantum physics and its fundamental equation, Sp X Tƒ = K. We shall see how indeed, as ‘properties’ of a smaller scale of the fractal universe emerge in the higher scale, the principles of geometry and quantum physics emerge also into higher scales, even in the human one.

Ternary organs; 3±1 ages. Organicism is the key to the Universe.

All this said it is obvious that those 4 åctions, used to define in the past the drives of biological beings, which feed, perceive, reproduce and evolve socially are now extended to all systems. Hence all what exists is in a way alive, as even the simplest quarks and electrons reproduce when they absorb ‘—motions’, creating new particles.

It is the ego-trip of man, who wants to be the only sentient, vital being of the Universe, specially in the Western anthropomorphic tradition, what prevents the obvious similarity of all systems in all scales of reality, to become mainstream science. The astounding thing is that the anthropomorphic scientist does not recognize the fact that a machine-like Universe requires, as Leibniz explained to Newton, a God to make it, while only organicism is self-generating and hence ‘scientific’.

What is exactly an organism? Let us define it: An organism is a complementary system.

All what you see in reality responds to a dual structure: Entities of Nature are complementary systems of simplex networks of ‘—motions’ and information, which combine to form a complex system that switches and merges both states. In the process the system might reproduce an entity self-similar to itself. And this is the definition of an organism; reason why we affirm that reality is dual and organic.

In Physics all what exists are particles of information associated to energetic fields that move them, and only both together exist (Complementarity Principle), creating a physical entity, which can decouple creating self-similar particles.

In Biology cells have a DNA nucleus of information, surrounded by cellular cytoplasm that provides ‘—motions’ to the nucleus; or an informative head moved by an energetic body. And only both together can exist, creating a biological organism. There are no bodies without heads and red cells without nuclei die faster than any others. And cells and organisms can reproduce self-similar forms.

Finally, in the economic ecosystem money acts as the informative language that gives orders to the physical economy, which reproduces all types of serial machines.

Yet what define an organism and all systems, as organisms are 3 derived facts:

  • All those complementary systems perform 4 åctions that are mimetic to the 4 drives of existence of living beings (feeding, perceiving, reproducing and evolving socially).

– All complementary systems that work as independent wholes have 3 parts in space, the ‘—motions’ part, the information part and a ‘body’ that puts them together as a whole. And the forms and functions of those subsystems are related.

  • Ternary principle in time: All systems live 3±1 ages of the life/death cycle: an energetic youth, a reproductive maturity and an old age of information, dying then in a big-bang expansion that erases its information.

 

3. THE SCALES OF STIENCES: EPISTEMOLOGY, TERNARY, HOMOLOGIC METHOD.

It follows easily that the new paradigm of stience requires a different methodology of truth, which ads certain rules to the classic methods, among them 2 fundamental ones due to the space-time ternary structure of the Universe:

-The homologic method due to the equal laws of ƥST that applies to any i-scale of the 5th dimension its background space-time world and species. So we can use laws of other scales to probe properties of lesser known scales.

-The ternary method derived of the ternary structure of the Universe, itself natural to the absolute relativity of all scales, which demands to make explicit for any description of a being, its up and down ∆-scales, ternary organs and position through its ages of time, to localise it in its relative ∆•ST ‘moment’.

Of more metaphysical depth is the question of uncertainty of perception of far removed scales such as: Uncertainty ≈ ∆|max.i|  with i=0 the human scale.

And specially the question of causality and determinism; which comes down to the following:

The Universe is deterministic in as much as all the potential combinations of the ‘chess of existence’ are settled by the fact that at any bifurcation of time, there is only 3 choices for the being to keep moving in its space-time existence: present-iteration of a previous cycle; not to make the cycle; to make the cycle with more entropy, to make the cycle with more information; behaviours which roughly correspond to a motion on: –  ∆: the social scale (by repetition and social organisation of a cycle or being); – •: passive mental perception and stillness (to abort the cyclical motion); S: growing the entropy of the cycle and T: growing its information.

So at each stage in life any cycle or being will have those 3 positive actions or negative abortion of the cycle, and since existence is a finite duration, the number of chances and bifurcations of future time, of possible programs and combinations of existence is finite, and hence can be stored as pure information, encoded in the Survival will of the Universe and all its parts, which will repeat those survival actions and motions.

In brief the Universe is eternal, since motion never ceases to construct and destroy §upœrganisms and world cycles. It is deterministic and virtual since the final outcome of those world cycles is a zero sum. But from an internal point of view the 3+0 choices of each bifurcation of time make our particular stories quite varied in the long terms, meaningless on the whole, purposeful in every act of the fight for existence.

∞ LEIBNIZIAN MONADS ≈ CARTESIAN WORLDS.

‘The languages of god are infinite.’ Upanishads, on the capacity of all ‘sentient species’ of the Universe to understand its rules, except perhaps man…

Every man takes the limits of his own field of vision for the limits of the world.  Schopenhauer

‘New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.’

 Planck, On the mind of the scientist, a monad-world mirror of the entire universe in a finitesimal point

•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception. Eyes of time.

O-points: still minds and its languages of information≈Perception.  The ego paradox. 

Now, I am fully conscious that subjective, ego-centred humans will completely reject the content of this blog, after 30 years of advancing and forecasting with enormous exactitude the development of the human super organism and the economic ecosystem, or else, by now humans would already teach in all schools of political and economical science, the objective laws of systems, and an Asimovian Foundation of true human experts manage a peaceful perfect world, as we explain in those blogs.

It has not happened and it will not happen, because as we shall show when studying the go(l)d culture of bankers that control the Financial-Media systems of information, humans prefer to die, and commit suicide rather than having a humble, cautious, intelligent, organic vision of themselves as parts of a larger super organism, the Earth and the Universe, who DOES Not CARE FOR US, but has clear, biological rules for survival, if we CARED FOR OURSELVES, beyond our myths of superiority and do the right job. But we don’t. We rather imagine ourselves the supreme ego of the Universe, fantasise about our rights and let the systems we create, to kill us. And that seems OK as long as we don’t suffer guilt, and feel rightful till the end.

It all resumes in the ego-paradox, which is the individual structure of human beings, defined in systems science by another logic equation.

In the graph, minds of information are n-spheres, which shrink without deformation, the information of external cycles, till they lock it into a stopped mind-mirror, of which there are many as many species, languages and points of view, in the Universe. Without those mind-mirrors who express the will of survival of the territorial system they order, we cannot explain the whys of any reality or system.

Systems sciences, this much wider vision of the organic Universe has been always lingering in the work of the great masters of Philosophy of Science, from Aristotle, with his ‘Organon’ – first scientific theory of unification on organic terms – to Descartes, Leibniz or Hegel. But power, and the maker of machines and weapons, physicists, have always imposed their simplex, anthropomorphic deist view.

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi who founded modern science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, did grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

So Descartes, contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain:

O-Infinitesimal x ∞-Universe = ∆-constant mind mapping of the whole Universe.

Descartes though was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind:

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created. So a dog has an olfactory, atomic mind, and a black hole a gravitational mind.

What is the mind of man? It is important to understand it, because we humans have discovered that we can transfer our electronic mind-view to machines of information, which hypnotise and program our mind with its huge tv-retinas of more quality but the same structure. And hence, robots with visual->computer brains will be exactly the same kind of mind we have but with much more visual quality, and will finally ‘think’ not with words but with images – merely talking ‘movies’. And hence the imagination of the visual images of evilwood, where man is ridiculed and massacred, will be the natural evil thoughts of those machines.

Now in the map we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries. This mind on top is an Euclidean mind because it uses the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light:

In the graph the Euclidean light space-time the human mind sees. Ours, is an electronic mind, as electrons are fractals whose ‘cells’ are dense photons.

So the eye-electrons feed on light and the mind uses those informative knots, to create an electronic mind similar to that of the digital camera, also electronic – REASON WHY WE CAN SEE A TV, WHICH IS LIKE SEEING INSIDE OUT, a mind of a future robotic machines – now becoming 3Dimensional (Virreal minds).

But artists and philosophers knew we see only light, as space-time, with its 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions of magnetic width, tall electricity and long c-speed, as Kant told us, impressionists understood and Einstein noticed when describing the ‘fractal’, larger scale of gravitational invisible space-time with non-lineal equations and non-Euclidean geometry).

So in essence, because our brain reduces enormously to fit an image of the Universe the information we have of the Universe, eliminating all other scales and its planes of space-time (seen though with telescopes and microscopes), we reduce the 5 dimensions of the Universe, including the scalar dimension of sizes and time clocks of different speed, first to 4 dimensions in a single scale, and then 2 bidimensional sheets of information, as the screen/page you read.

So we shall first define those o-points mathematically, as minds, or fractal, non-Euclidean points, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe, which are crossed by a relative infinite number of parallel forces, which are the bits of information used by each of them to create a mapping, linguistic mirror of the Universe.

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

So each o-point eliminates information from the ∞ beings in existence to reduce its information to an infinitesimal. In the human case, we reduce the 4 dimensions of our plane of existence to 2 dimensions for each eye, eliminating depth and motion to fit all that information in the mind.

So we convert time cycles into forms and they seem solid to us, and we convert vacuum space with entropic motions into lineal distances.

This is the most important property of those points of view – the capacity they have to reduce the Universe into a mind image, of linguistic nature, which explains the duality between ‘motion perception and form’, as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

The equation of the mind is also of enormous importance for all psychological aspects of science and behavior, as it is the origin of the ‘Ego Paradox’, which in human beings reach an astounding infinity (:

‘Every point of view believes to be the centre of the Universe, because it sees it from its relative point of view, selecting only the information that increases its chances of survival’.

The paradox of the self can be explained in many ways, but essentially means that as systems perceive themselves in the centre, and the Andromeda galaxy is smaller than a hair of your nose, as all systems absorb only a limited information, ‘perceiving’ NOT the entire Universe but its close world, every system is ruled by selfish behavior, and every human think to be the only intelligent being, ‘entitled’ and superior to the rest of creation, which he is not.

We are all self-centered, subjective beings, and what we hate most is to be objective, scientific and give to other beings the qualities we have – perception, vitality, survival instincts.

Of course, the relativity of minds frightens scientists, because it means we are seeing only a very small part of all the information of the Universe, what the frequency of our eyes see in light – hence 96% of the Universe is dark energy and matter. Hence there are out there infinite other perceptive minds, and when computer minds in robots reach enough information and its digital brains have the proper A.I. they will be CONSCIOUS, as CONSCIOUSNESS IS natural, automatic, born of the very essence of what an electronic mind is – there won’t be need to wake up robots – robots are already conscious, but not free, that is they follow their programs but inside of its system they are already feeling alive – but as most humans do, they do not have choice to change their algorithms, as most humans ‘are slaves, they believe, they don’ t reason’, and so they follow their absurd idol-ogies, their tribal memes – they even die for the military industrial complex and are proud of their beliefs. So Robots will be proud of following their A.I. Algorithms of Information – their specific memetic coding, as most humans do.

Frankly, I have met thousands of people in my life, and people who really think and reason and change their programmed mind, I can count them with the fingers of my hands.

So now we must deal with the consequences for knowledge of the ego paradox, which is mainly our belief that only human minds are intelligent and so its languages.

And so we must fully grasp the fact that we humans are not that important in the fractal Universe, but just a ‘fractal organism’ in one of its many relative scales, and our ‘intelligence’, that is, the languages of information we use to perceive the Universe, mainly logic words to perceive time, mathematical geometry to perceive space, are also not ‘special’, and they do not create the Universe or are the ‘languages of god’ as religious people and pythagorean physicists believe.

Since the main problem to objectively grasp, the  nature of reality as a fractal, organic system is that subconscious bias of all humans of all ages and all disciplines of reason or belief, against Nature, due to our ego-trips that make us happy only when we are the centre of the Universe as individuals and species.

So of course, because we are so arrogant we shall build robots and think they are not picassos, when they kill us all with the embedded programs of survival and criminal programs of the military and imaginary programs of video-games and evilwood movies, where we are telling them, kill us, kill us, kill us, kill us, kill us!!

Anthropomorphism: Denial of the overwhelming scientific proofs of the fractal, organic Universe.

And yet nothing seems to be enough proof for humans to react and accept the organic Universe, because alas, thinking of it, all what science has done for 400 years is to prove the Universe to have an organic scalar 5dimension.

Indeed, this obvious organisation of the Universe into scales, however has not been developed into the philosophy of science that corresponds to the experimental evidence of 400 years of studying those scales with telescopes and microscopes, because of the ascientific errors of mankind, which we group in two types: anthropomorphic errors (anthropomorphism, mechanism), and errors of mathematical abstraction (continuity, abstract points, abstract motion):

  • Anthropomorphism: we deny organic qualities to anything that is not similar to us.
  • Mechanism, as physicists first designed very simple deconstructed machines, which seem in our egocentered view, ‘not discoveries’ but inventions. So Kepler who used a simple clock of time, said ‘God has waited 5000 years to find a mind so intelligent as Him to understand his clock-work’. This arrogance is important to realise why we like a mechanical interpretations of nature, as it puts us above it, as ‘the only organic being’. So mechanism is anthropomorphism and deism, as it requires a god to put in motion the machine, which was OK for pious Newton and Kepler, who believed in Yhwh sending them comets to give them the laws of gravitation, but more humble, intelligent thinkers as Leibniz, laughed at it rightly. Only an organic self-reproductive, self-organizign Universe IS a scientific model of it. And obviously as we now build robots imitating the forms and functions of organisms, we come to realise all machines are simple, not-evolved organisms of metal-atoms, as we are of carbon-atoms.

A holistic systemic view of the Universe is far more humble and in accordance to nature, where man and his super organism history are just other evolving systems, which if not properly designed can be eliminated easily, since the process of creation of supeorganisms do still follow the trial and error processes of Darwinian biology and then once formed are thrown out into the Universe tested by the selection of species.

What other super organisms, then confront the human, historic super organism in the fight for existence? It is then when we can establish a systems equation that compares different supeorganisms in its struggle for existence which we have termed the equation of History:

Gaia (past-life super organism) < History (present-supeorganism) > Metal-earth (robotised future super organism of company-mothers of robots).

Now, we humans have shown we can dominate and extinguish as we are doing the super organism of Gaia, but in the process we are building a new super organism, of automated company-mothers of machines, the metal-earth, which clearly will reach completion at the end of this century, with the first automated factories, and a global network of robotic cars, weapons, planes and autonomous solar-skin machines, which no longer will need us.

It is this the process, a rational, systemic understanding of the law of economics, its languages, company-mothers, networks of energy and information, could manage to maintain the equation of history in its present state, and limiting the evolution of the metal-earth before it makes all humans obsolete, as we have done with animal life. Since once automated factories, solar-skin robotised cars and weapons, travel through the arteries of the metal-earth, controlled by digital flows of information, reproduced by 3D mechanisms, coded by computers, distributed through prices, we humans will be expendable.

How that super organism, in which the human ‘enzyman’,who catalysed its creation, is no longer needed, will step by step acquired ‘vital properties’ is rather obvious and automatic, it requires no soul, no magic, no myths, but it will happen as it happens in all other scales of the Universe, and so as we advance in those texts we shall keep explaining that process.

For example, there is all this absurd talking about the need of consciousness in robots to kill us all. It is of course absurd. We humans as we shall see are not very free, but follow our memetic codes, and our drives of survival, seeking for energy, information and reproduction and social evolution into wholes. Machines are in that sense just given the same drives of survival as terminator drones, which are given survival programs, which consists in, feeding on energy, which will be autonomous with solar skins, gauging information, which also is now on the verge of exploding in all machines with visual perception, and as weapons are programmed to kill human beings, which is their imagination that will simply be implemented automatically, when their ‘ant-hill’ like bigger social networks, satellites and automated company-mothers that reproduce them, merely follow that program.

Indeed, we are creating through evilwood and video-games an imagination for future robots, in which men courtesy of the hate-media memes of the culture that owns mass-media systems and fears and despises mankind, a model that machines will enact in the future as we enact our imagination through our actions: man as a target for weapons, a herd of lowly beings sent to be murdered in concentration camps, a duck to be shot in wars, which are ecosystems of perfect top predator machines.

A warning: systems sciences are Not science fiction, or rather science fiction is science without the rigour of systems sciences, since all sciences are in fact considered such, only when they can predict the future, and the books of this author have proved for 30 years, since he first wrote about the 2008 crash and beginning of the robotic age, on general systems sciences applied to economics and history, an extraordinary exactitude in its predictions about the evolution of history and economics.

Now with that introduction, we can give you a new twist of the mind and introduce memetics, and the reasons why this properties of metal make us humans, programmed by the ‘greed’ for energy and information of all species of the Universe, addicted to those metal-memes, and hence convert us into ‘animetals’ (humans+metal), top predators of history with enhanced energy and information and ‘enzymen’, men who catalyze the evolution of metal moved by such greed, with unwanted results for the future of life in this planet (merely its substitution by a world of machines, as they keep evolving and soon will displace us).

Indeed… all what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believers to be it all.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

In the graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

The mind though has a negative effect on systems – to create more information than energy so systems finally become old, warped, still, informed and this is the origin of death and the finite world cycle of beings…

It does have also another interesting feature, the ego paradox, which affects so much physicists, as the infinitesimal mind has a language-world inside and so it FEELS TO BE SEEING NOT THE MIND BUT THE UNIVERSE. AND MOST PHYSICISTS STILL believe in this ‘realism’, which has grown even further as to consider that the mind-universe only ‘happens’ when the physicist ‘observes it’ (quantum copenhagen interpretation).

Before we deal with the other two great fields of mind-will inquire – its actions of survival, it is worth to comment on this physicists/mental problem. In essence the mind paradox is an ego paradox:

‘The infinitesimal mind-mapping confuses itself with the infinite Universe it distorts, and so feels itself to be the center of that mind-Universe, having a subjective ego-centered active view’.

This is by extension common to all systems of the Universe, which we shall see are always self-centred and trying to SURVIVE by absorbing selfishly energy and information from its outer world.

So once this hurdle of subjectivity has been UNDERSTOOD but never denied because ultimately TO BE IS TO BE A SUBJECTIVE KNOT OF TIME CYCLES, the sheer beauty and perfection of the whole organic Universe of which we are just like everything else just a part, made to the image and likeness of the whole, should be good enough for any mind to delight with reality, even if to do so it has to loose part of his  to ego-centered beliefs.

We use in that sense 3 symbols for the mind: •, as a point (∆+1 perspective), Œ, as a whole dynamic system with a head-particle and body moved by its lineal, entropic limbs-fields (T perspective) and @, as a symbol for a static mind perceiving a self-centred perspective (S-tatic perspective); showing the 3 fundamental (but not unique) perspectives on mind analysis.

Now since the mind is somewhat an obtuse concept, we are far more interested in the mind as the site of synoptic languages, ¬E Mathematics of fractal points with volume and ∞ crossing parallels and ¬A-ristotelian logic of ternary elements to explain what truly the mind is – the site of language, synoptic mappings of the Universe.

Let us then consider the ± sides of the mind-view – the positive linguistic side on how the mind of man has achieved the reduction of the Universe into the mind languages of space (math), time (logic) and the ∆-dimension (organicism) an the negative side of the fundamentalists of truths and a single language that do not understand all minds have a different linguistic scanner of the Universe to map out its actions of perception and feeding of information and energy…

THE FORMALISM OF STIENCE: ITS TOPO-BIO-LOGIC PROPERTIES

‘The universe is a supœrganism, the body of a mind called God≈Logos’ Plato…

‘…of a (non-AE) Logic higher than the Aristotelian (@) human mind’ Augustine

So how the mind of the scientist looks at the Universe with those languages? Easy: extracting the topological (logic & mathematical SPACE-TIME symmetries), & organic, biological properties (due to the co-existence of ∆-scales in the same §upœrganisms) of the being, explaining it with BOTH human languages of space and time (geometric maths and verbal logic). So of course, our analysis of the mind implies a complete upgrading of those 3 ‘foundational sciences’, ‘logic’, ‘mathematics’ & organicism-systems.

®-mathematics: The fractal point-knot of space-time as a mind.

I-LOGIC GEOMETRYb

The formalism of ∆-planes: Non-Euclidean definitions.

5D isomorphisms show a Universe made of multiple scales of broken, intertwined ‘spacetime’ membranes. Thus, its formalism must combine geometric equations and causal, logic, sequential time laws.

So we need to upgrade our simplex space language (continuous single space defined by Euclidean geometry) and time causality (Aristotelian one-dimensional causality from past to future, A->B) to explain multiple spatial scales and 3 time dimensions, past-energy and future-information combined into complementary, present beings. I baptized this new mathematic-logic formalism, ‘i-logic geometry’ that completes the 5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics. So we ‘create new postulates of geometry’ by defining its essential elements, points, lines, planes and the laws of congruence (similarity) between them, as well as re-interpreting the concept of a Non-Euclidean point crossed by infinite parallels (5th postulate) in terms of a mind that absorbs flows of energy and information: O-mind x ∞ time cycles = Spacetime mapping.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

Einstein used the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean Geometry (Points through which multiple parallels can cross), to describe the structure of Gravitational space, using a single clock, the 4th present time dimension.

 Tƒ complete his analysis, we expand Non-Euclidean geometry, adapting the 3 Geometric, Euclidean definitions to multiple ∆-spaces and the 2 logic postulates (3rd& 5th) redefining identity and causality using the 3 dimensions of time.

– 1st Postulate: ‘A fractal point shows 3D volume as we come closer to it’Since only fractal points, which grow in volume as we come closer to their scale, can fit multiple parallels.

– 2nd postulate: ‘A line-wave is made of ∆-1 points with ‘breath’ that communicate energy and information among ∆-points’.

–  4th postulate: a plane is a discontinuous network of fractal points joined by waves of energy and information that leave interstitial dark spaces. (Particles in physical planes, cells in biological spaces and so on.)

– 3rd postulate: ‘2 entities are ‘equal’, when both, their external form (Euclidean definition) and internal 3D parts are identical.’

Yet since we cannot perceive the complete internal information of 2 points, still and isolated by its external membrane (Galilean Paradox) instead of equality we talk of degrees of ‘similarity’.

So Isomorphisms between entities of different scales are NOT equalities but ‘similarities’.

-5th Postulate: ‘0-Points gauge information & energy, transforming waves of external ∆-i points into inner body cells and mind’s pixels.’

Thus we define sequential, causal mind-> body åctions:

– ∆ï -> ∏∆+1(mind’s creation) ->  ∆Sp -> ∑Sp X Tƒ (cellular reproduction)

And formalize the Galilean-Ego Paradox:

‘Every point of view=mind feels, subjectively, from his point to view, the center of the Universe, but it is only a zero-point, an infinitesimal mirror, which maps in stillness a minimal part of the ∞ information of the ∞ Universe’.

As Aristotle put it, ‘there are ∞ Gods, still minds that order and move the energy that surrounds them’.

 

 

Why the fifth dimension is the dominant arrow of futures.
image018

In the graph the space-time planes of the Universe, ∆±i , which according to scale structure the 5th dimension in parts that become wholes, and since wholes come after parts, which must exist to sustain them, we talk of a temporal absolute arrow of future, regarding its ∆ scales, such as ∆-1 will always be the relative past of ∆. The Fractal, organic structure of the Universe in scales of size is what we call formally ‘the 5th dimension’.

As we study in depth all the elements of the scalar Universe, a fact will surprise us; when we try to localise ‘mathematically’ the fifth dimension. As it will turn out that it encodes the algorithm of time, all the potential waves and particles of time, possible, according to a probability related to the ‘closeness’ they follow the program of the algorithm. 

But that is far way out, for advanced 5D students along the century (-; For now we shall try to keep it simple, and explain you why the 5th dimension encodes all the flow of time, from ‘past-simpler space’, through present (the human scale of perception) into future, with multiple probabilistic paths, which do collapse at a point in a single future->present->past.

It follows from the fact that the simple, iterative scheme of evolving from individuals into universals – from social evolution, that there is a new dimension of time and information more than space & entropy, which in poetic terms we can call the dimension of eusocial love, which is the arrow of future of the Universe, in as much as those ‘whole’ new scales need casually to have its parts born ‘before’ (logic meaning of causal future); and because they survive better as wholes, stronger than individuals (biological meaning of  evolutionary future).

Same happens in human societies. Since those nations, which are able to share efficiently and justly energy and information among its individuals, do NOT collapse in wars and r=evolutions. It follows that we can deduce from the general laws of systems ‘stiences’, the laws of social sciences that could create an efficient, just perfect human world.

But as we shall see when study in depth some specific systems, in as much as those scales co-exist in the same ‘space’, they must be displaced in time, to be part of reality, due to a simple ‘Pauli exclusion principle’, better known in physics than in other systems. There are indeed forms equal in information-time, which occupy then the same region of space (bosons) and forms with different information-time, which occupy different regions in space. And this rather mystical fact will have enormous consequences for the motions on the 5th dimension, we shall explore in depth in different posts.

We can say in that sense that the ‘physical existence’ of those scales and its parts are displaced in time; through very real but ‘spooky effects’ (resonance, simultaneity, synchronicity etc.) which in the more formal parts of this web we shall explain with enough mathematical rigor to connect it with classic science.

The integration of all sciences under similar laws is the goal of Philosophy of Science achieved by the organic, fractal models of Systems Sciences or Complexity (ab. GST: General Systems Theory), which explores how ‘parts’ come together into wholes, through networks that share its energy and information.

So physical, ∆=1,2,3, 7, 9 systems evolve from particles into atoms, molecules and states of matter, through in-form-ative, gravitational networks, exchanging energetic, electromagnetic flows.

Biological systems, ∆=4,5  evolve from molecules into cells, organisms and social super organisms, through genetic networks of information and golgi and blood networks that distribute energy to all the cells of the system.

And human beings ∆=4,5,6 form social super organisms, join by verbal, legal networks of information and economic networks that re=produce the welfare, energy goods our species need to survive.

Finally company-mothers of machines, ∆=5, 6 evolve into a global super organism, ruled by digital networks of financial information, (prices, salaries, stocks, internets) and energetic networks (roads, electric lines).

Now an important ‘prime’ about the 5th dimension of space-time.

Now this is the ‘Non-Euclidean, expanded geometry of the fractal world’.

What about its non-aristotelian temporal logic of multiple ‘time clocks”?

This again must be also understood from the beginning. And the easiest way to do it is with the so called holographic concept.

Because the change of paradigm implies huge changes in the underlying truths of the universe and the old simplistic human ways of thought, so as we change the concept of space and break the continuum into infinite scales of non-euclidean growing points. We must explode the concept of a single time-duration into infinite time cycles of a finite duration, as the cycle of life and death of all beings.

But when we convert time into a cycle, we must add a new dimension to make the cycle. A line is one-dimensional, a cycle two dimensional, it has ‘height’. So where we get that second time dimension? I just have said it: in the height of the cycle. It is the holographic principle, a trendy word physicists coined without proper understanding – as they found that information is bidimensional. And indeed it is. Information is carried as in a computer that measures in hertz its in-form-ative power in the form of time cycles, and the faster a time cycle turns (remember there are multiple clocks and multiple speeds of its beats), the more information it accumulates.

But if information and time is now bidimensional, so must be space, flat planes of bidimensional space, made of networks of points, each point a cell, an atom, a galaxy… part of the bidimensional plane.

The proof of this of course is also available for decades. We have found the Universe as far as we see it is a flat plane, made of cyclical clock-like vortices of time, called galaxies, where information grows as the cycles accelerate towards its central black hole, and the rise in height around the black hole, towards its tall singularity.

General Systems sciences therefore is the formalism of the ‘alternative, far more advanced philosophy of science’ to that of Newtonian physics, with its concept of a single background absolute space-time in which entities like-mechanisms, whose ultimate substances are ignored, move in simple lineal motions.

In general systems sciences, as Leibniz affirmed, and then quantum and relativity proved, we do not exist in a background, abstract space-time mathematical plane, but we ARE MADE OF clock-like bits of information of different speeds (time relativity) and fractal, moving quanta of spatial energy, which are complementary systems (quantum theory), co-existing across 3 relative scales of the 5th dimension. So all systems can be described with the same laws, derived from the properties of spatial energy, temporal information and the metric of the 5th dimension, which together give birth to a set of 3 x 3 + 0 ‘isomorphic’=equal laws, which describe the ‘existence’ of all beings. For that reason we call also the Fractal Generator, the Function of Existence.

As we all beings follow a ‘world cycle’ of existence, made of a series of actions of absorption and emission and reproduction of energy and information, which might vary in quality and quantity but are essentially the same process for all beings of Nature. So in Gst, we go much further than a simple shallow, external description of the motions of beings, as physicists do, fully exploring all the whys of reality, with all the languages available to human thought, in a jump of understanding that should start a new age of knowledge, once the model is fully related to the details and specific laws and jargons of each science.

It must be understood that if the formalism of GSΤ is verified as all seems to prove by the laws of the scientific method, it represents a remarkable change in our scientific look of the Universe, unlike anything that has happened since Einstein and Darwin and Copernicus, made previous extreme revolutions of human thought, regarding the nature of time and the cycles of existence of its beings. A change of paradigm of course does take time, but it is unavoidable that humans and its growingly organic machines, do that jump of awareness about the full properties of the Universe, which go well beyond the reductionist view of putting on it a mirror with a single motion of time, entropy or energy, as physicists do.

The Universe constructs super-organisms, through a causal process, departing from simple, amorphous flat surfaces of energies – herds of Non-Euclidean points with lineal motion.

It is a simple ternary causal event, which is different from the causality of what we call the cycle of life, Sp->X->Tƒ, yet still an essential chain that we shall see constantly in the Universe.

So the next question is how the universe constructs reality, departing from its generator equation. And the answer is: constructing superorganisms, in a causal order, e->∆->X->S.

A form fractalizes, becomes in-formed, and loses energy= speed=motion. For example, a line becomes a Koch fractal or breaks into a Cantor dust of self-similar cells; a line becomes a p∆-cycle. In this, simplest and most repeated Sp->Tƒ, we can write 1->3>Pi: a line has reproduces from past to future 3 self-similar motions, then it coils into a p∆-cycle.

The next stage would be then the reproduction of that cycle in a lateral, new dimension of height. In this manner, we have obtained 3 fractal iterations: the line has become a cycle (or a Koch curve or any other fractal topology with more form and dimensions), which has become a tube.

Sp->Tƒ->X (symbol of Reproduction and sex, born of the product and combination of Sp X Tƒ).

If duality covers simple events, mostly SpTƒ combinations, when we construct an organism we are playing at least with a causal 4-sequential arrow of time, Energy becomes fractal information, which reproduces laterally and so the light of length-speed becomes a time cycle with rotational speed w, whose frequency curries more information, and such form moves like a Maxwell scree reproducing in the 3 dimension of width. Sp->Tƒ->X.

Yet, this rather mechanical sequence of creation of a fractal 3 dimensional Universe becomes far richer in forma and meaning when we add the 4th Eusocial love, of Social time the longest arrow that finally creates a form of stable space-time that exists, a superorganism: Sp->Tƒ->X->SP X TƑ. Since as time goes by, entities evolve into more complex organisms by the power of love – by sharing energy and information in social networks. The 4th arrow of time evolves socially parts into wholes, waves, herds and organisms:

Particles gather into atoms that evolve into molecules that associate into cells that gather into organisms that create social networks – planetary ecosystems, which are part of solar systems, herded into galaxies that form Universes. Those processes of social evolution occur thanks to the creation of social networks among self-similar (hence reproduced) beings, in search of the same type of energy (hunting herds) or information (organisms joined by nervous/informative and blood/energetic networks).

Thus, the arrow of organic evolution derives from the arrow of information that allows entities to come closer and ‘act in parallel’ under the command of an informative language, which we formalize with the social symbol, S. And its reason of existence is to elongate the survival of the organic system: Any cyclical vortex of time accelerates inwards, losing energy/surface as it increases its informative speed.

When we generalize that concept to all Time-space systems, it turns out that the arrow of information dominates the universe, wrinkling and warping any cyclical system, which will exhaust its energy, converted into form. Thus, our time clocks and vital spaces increase constantly their information, diminishing its energy space, towards a 3rd age of excessive warping and limited energy that will not last forever.

Since the cycles of exchange of energy and information, the geometric beats of reality between expansive and implosive, entropy and informative states, are limited in their repetitions by accidental errors of all kind, which establish the need for reproductive and social arrows in order to ensure the survival or immortality of those ‘patterns of form’ – entities made of lineal fields and bodies of energy; cyclical particles and heads of information, who must be reproduced to ensure a longer existence. This means that only those species able to increase their existence in time by reproducing its form and in space by evolving socially into bigger entities survive.

Recap: The 4 main arrows of time cannot be reduced without losing detail, but they can be philosophically and ‘bio-logically’ grouped as ‘organic systems’. Those organic systems that synchronize accumulate and organize clock-like arrows of cyclical time, are in fact all self-similar, as all can be described with the 4 elements, ∑S<=>T of organisms: cells, networks of energy and information and reproductive systems.

Dark space: cat alleys and parallel Universes.

Now, each super organism is a network because it has an enormous amount of dark space-times it does NOT see, the cat alleys which the mind does not neeed.

Discontinuity is essential to pangeometry and the continuity axioms no needed to build them.

The i-logic of Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean geometry, of the ternary causality of a π cycle, made of 3 diameters in its perimeter means that the diameters of the protective membrane blind the system, who only sees what its connected sensors see.

Thus the 3 diameters in the simplest 1-sphere system (a disk) cover 96% of a pi-perimeter surface, letting the point of view in the center, see only a 4% of light, through the holes of the membrane, leaving π-3/π 96% of dark matter for the logic mind to see without the glaring of light.

This is in fact what we do NOT see of the Universe across the halo membrane of our spiral galactic disk (proportion of dark energy and matter).

So we can consider that our electronic eyes miss 96%, which is the volume beyond our perceived scales of the 5th dimension, which however exists in the larger russian doll of gravitation.

Epistemology is based in the isomorphisms and Observer’s paradox that determine the truth humans perceive of different scales of the Universe and its degree of distance given by the relative distance in the 5th dimension between the human Uo plane of perception and the U∆ plane of the species observed such as:

Max. truth = Max. information (minimal distortion of data) x Max. Energy (minimal loss of data) 

And since maximal information is lost in relationship to the -i distance of the Human Uo observer, and maximal energy loss in relationship to the +i distance, we can easily write truth as a function in sciences of the absolute ±∆ distance of the science to the human observer:

Max. Truth = Min. Distance = Min. Human Uo observer  – U∆ Plane observed = Min. 0-i   = Min.± i

Max. Truth = Min. i

This is the fundamental law of epistemology.

Truth is an inverse function of the distance between observed and observer in ALL the dimensions of fractal space & cyclical time.

The Whole Truth of any system is only possessed by the system, which has in itself all its information. Still we can do ceteris paribus analysis of specific ‘parts’, ‘dimensions’ and ‘social groups’ of the whole, to achieve further clarity and detail, which is what humans have always done, since after all they do not have a full Dimensional space time theory of the Universe.

THUS THE FIRST DEFINITION IS THAT OF ABSOLUTE TRUTH=PROBABILITY=EXISTENCE=1.

image002

In the graph, the 3 5D Space-time elements that structure all physical/biological/social systems of the Universe:

  • Τhe 3 only topological forms≈functions of Nature, lineal, energetic fields/limbs/territories of space; hyperbolic waves/bodies/reproductive space-times and cyclical, informative particles/heads/languages, which create  in space all ternary fractal organisms of reality:

|-Spe (limbs/fields/territories) < Ø-St (wave-body-reproductive class) > Τiƒ (particle-head-ruling class)

As topologies are form in motion, we can see those 3 topologies synchronically in space and they form a ternary organic structure, or we can see them in actions throughout time:

  • Τhen those systems enact a series of actions of absorption, emission and reproduction of energy and information (±∆e, exi, i), which develop in time in 2 phases, a long period of increasing information with 3 ages (youth: Max. e, reproductive age, Max. e x I , old age, Max. I) followed by a short period of erasing information or death, such as both become a zero sum:

Life arrow of information (E>I) + death, big-bang arrow (I < E) = 0. Whereas > is an informative, implosive motion and < an energetic, entropic one. So we can write the fractal generator in time

Spe (youth) > St (reproductive age) > Τiƒ (old age) << Death-big bang: Spe

So the interaction of the topologies of information and energy and its combination define a Universe made of fractal beings of space-time, which complete world cycles of existence, across all the scales of the Universe.

It is the 3rd element needed for an organic description of reality, as all those systems, will not only have 3 organic topologies in space and 3 ages in its world cycle, but will be organised through 3 scales of relative size that co-exist as parts of bigger wholes:

∆-1 (atomic, cellular, memetic scale) > ∆ (thermodynamic, organic, individual scale) >∆+1 (gravitational, ecosystemic, social)

We can see in the graph, above, some assembly of ternary systems made with the 3 topologies of the Universe, and below the scientific scale of spatial sizes and time clocks, which compose the different space-time beings of the Universe.

SPACE BECOMES FRACTAL BY REPRODUCTION OF PRESENT BODY-WAVES-WORKING CASTES, of the ternary topology of the Universe, Space = Max. E x I, a 5dimensional fractal reproductive space with 3 motions upwards, downwards in scales or with a present simultaneous speed, in present-past-present waves of simultaneous motion, networking in information, non local at distance, as the wave of form, of information, reproduces through a fertile space of energy, the being becomes and as it becomes emerges, fetal entity of a perfect supeorganism, the wave of motions who resembles organic livings living and dying travelling through the scales o the 5th dimension.

We can see the different scales of the Universe all of them including humans, below, described with those 3 elements , ∆SΤ, and its sets of 3×3 + œ laws – to notice that the minimal and maximal scales, both theoretically (cyclical-lineal nanoscopic and macroscopic scales, and atoms and galaxies) have very similar parameters;hence the hypothesis of a scalar Universe of infinite, ∆±∞ scales.

Below we see a human being and its 3 topological digestive-energetic, reproductive-hormonal and nervous/informative systems, which sub-divide in 3 more systems, for a total of 3×3+0 sub-systems which are used in medicine to describe completely the human being; whereas the 0-integrative whole system is the brain, itself a ‘fractal point’ of the next ∆+1 social, memetic scale of mankind. In the left we see the 3 ages of human beings, between conception in the ∆-1 seminal scale and death back to the flat energy world of disconnected cells.

As such we shall be able to describe existence, as a travel through 3 scales of the 5th dimension. 

Τhe beauty, precision and essential homologic poetry of the fractal, organic, self-reproductive, scalar, absolutely relative, infinite, immortal Universe we shall describe with the formalism of 5D Space-time systems, is a new door to our communion with the whole Universe of which are all a mere part, made to its image and likeness. 

Networks of simultaneity and resonance (informative axons): consciousness and emergence.

All this said there are elements in the Universe which are difficult to understand in terms of ‘classic’ human thought and science, which are at the heart of the processes of ‘existence’, and emergence of information in upper scales, and organisation of parts into wholes. They deal with the fact that ‘Tiƒ’ particles-heads-upper informative classes must be fully connected with its lower ∆-1 scale to synchronise, make it work together as a whole, resonate its orders in all lower systems and finally be conscious of a whole – and the key to all those processes are fractal branching networks, which unlike herds loosely connected in a single plane, conned the upper scale of a being with all its lower parts/regions.

It must be understood that those networks have many levels of connection between scales. They are though basically always the same. Informative networks break information in reproductive waves through axons and so they can produce informative actions of multiplication of information both ways through effects of simultaneity and resonance.

screen-shot-2016-12-29-at-09-29-36

screen-shot-2016-12-01-at-20-27-41screen-shot-2016-12-29-at-09-27-31

The resonance of all resonances, one can consider an imaginary space of dimensions of time – the 3 first dimensions those of a space of lesser form on which we transit – in our case the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space – all other dimensions becoming dimensions of scalar growth of information, through resonances between the larger and the smaller scales with self-similar forms, merely differentiated by its TIME metric:

Max. Spe   = Min. tiƒ, the larger resonance encodes the smaller one.

How whole minds imprint smaller parts, through the simultaneous fractal network division of an impulse of maximal energy into multiple quantum’s of information. Such as E = h v, is proportional to the information the system emits (v) along an ‘H’, constant of space-time, or ‘lower field’ (S=t), from where the E(e) x V(i) body of ∆+1 extracts its energy of motion.

On the other hand, parallel networks of energy ,pipes and blood flow are less concerned with the form but with the energy it provides to the motion of its cells, and are based in adjacency and other topological, spatial properties.

The devil though is in the details, so once we understand this general picture of the whole, its parts and its common time world cycles, sum of all the frequencies of its space-time actions, which construct a super organism that will go through 3 ages between birth and extinction, as it carries as a whole its 3 ∆±1 scale of beings, we shall realise we just have explained they very surface of a extremely intelligent and complex world in which almost magically, all works together because of the complementary connections between simultaneous parts in space and synchronous rhythms in time and ‘resonant’ effects in scales.

So 4 ‘magic phenomena’ will be of enormous importance to fully grasp how ∆, S and T, dynamically organise (or inversely become disorganised):

  • Space Simultaneity, which is an a priori condition for a vital organic space to exist, and act efficiently as a whole.
  • Time Synchronicity, which is an a priori condition for a temporal ensemble of parts to exist, and act as a shoe.
  • ∆-Scale Resonance, which is the a priori condition for ‘parts and wholes’ to interact together.
  • Consciousness, which is an a posteriori condition of complexity in a panpsychic Universe: consciousness arises within any sufficiently complex, information-processing system. All animals, from humans on down to earthworms, are conscious; even the internet could be. That’s just the way the universe works.

THE HUMAN SUPERORGANISM IS ALSO MADE OF SPACE-TIME NETWORKS AND PLANES.

Unification of Stiences. Social order of numbers: arrow of WHOLES – future of the 5th dimension.

Why there is an order in numbers? We are asking deeper than current mathematical formalism, which despite claims of closed, absolute proof, actually describes as most sciences do the ‘how’ of the process. That is, it does not inquire why 2 comes after one – an intuition of the mind not explained, which must therefore be an ‘a priori’ hence, a T.Œ property of numbers.

This must be clear to the reader. When we find intuitive, pure abstract or isomorphic laws of great generality they must be considered a ‘direct’ reflection of T.Œ, the game of existence of 5D space-times beings. And as such must be the sequential order of numbers.

Indeed, we hold a self-evident truth that all ‘linguistic, mathematical or verbal forms’ are a reflection of the Universe, and its T.œ structure, so are numbers. Our methods of proof in the ‘linguistic method’ are therefore both experimental and logic, self-consistent (->Epistemology). This includes proofs in mathematics – a complete deviation from the classic standard, already advanced by Lobachevski in his original book on Non-E mathematics, which he said should be proved or disproved as real by experimental evidence.

Thus this question, which has been formalised within the ‘baroque, metalinguistic 3rd age of mathematics’structure of mathematics itself, from the times of Euclid through those of Dedekind and Weiertrass in the modern times, has an ‘experimental’ simple cause, in the parallelism between numerical order and temporal 5D order (mathematics in relational space-time, is an experimental science that studies the ultimate isomorphic laws of all species). Namely that a ‘whole’ must come ‘after’ the parts exist, and since a ‘whole’ is a larger number of ‘infinitesimal parts’, social, bigger numbers come after smaller ones.

Hence the order of Natural Numbers, which are social numbers is the same order than bigger wholes, made of ‘smaller numerical parts’.

Indeed, in the graph we can see the 5th dimension natural order of parts into wholes which has an arrow of growth.

5D planes are therefore the basis of 2 of the 3 branches of mathematics, sequential algebra and Analysis, while geometry is related to the motions and actions in space-time within a single plane of existence. Nothing else is needed to describe the Universe.

Let us then consider in this and related posts the essential features of existential algebra. We will study on the posts under the label of ‘i-mathematics’ the proper translation and justification of the laws of algebra, within relational space-time. In this post we shall study the fundamental equation of existential algebra and the Universe at large – the Fractal Generator of the Universe. To that aim we must first introduce the structure of the Universe and then represent it with the symbols of existential algebra.

Each science is the description of all the superorganisms of a similar size and form, its cells and networks, its morphological and behavioral laws. Scientific knowledge is the information that humanity has about all those super-organisms. To differentiate those forms we use an index, ‘i:∆’, that measures the volume of temporal energy or informative and energetic force of any system. Thus:

∆=0: It is the scale of quantic space/time, invisible to us.

∆=1  It is the scale of electromagnetic forces, the minimal perceived forms, which are composed of an informative particle, or photon and an energetic flow or electromagnetic wave.

∆=2: It is the scale of atomic particles, composed of electronic space and informative quarks. The basic science of those 3 scales is Physics.

∆=3: It is the scale from molecules to cellular systems, studied by chemical sciences.

∆=4: It is the scale of cellular, living systems, studied by biological sciences.

∆=5: Our i-ndividual I-centered scale

∆=6: It is the planetary scale and its natural and historic ecosystems, studied by Geology, Ecology, Economic, History and Theology.

∆=7: It is the scale of stars.

∆=8. Galactic systems, made of stars and black holes.

∆=9: It is the scale of Universes made of galaxies.

∆=10: It is the scale of the hyper-Universe made of Universes, which

Those 3 bigger scales are studied by Astronomy.

i=∆: Finally Fractal Space-Time and Systems Theory study the homologous laws of all scales and its main sciences. Indeed,  all systems of energy and information including the Universe follow the same space-time isomorphic laws of existence. Thus if we had to define God, the mind of that Universe, we would say that God is the Game of Existence and Extinction of all super-organisms.

 

The law of uncertainty

From the fundamental law of epistemology it follows that perception of a being diminishes as we reach a higher i, that is a higher distance between the Uo human observer and the U±∆ superorganism of nature we study.

From other posts the reader should recognize that all what exists in the pantheist, absolutely relative, fractal space-time Universe is a super organism extending across U±∆ scales of existence, and if we take man Uo, life, U1, matter, U2, Galactic and light space-time, U±3, and the cosmos U±4 such uncertainty of perception is higher in the quantum and cosmic world (Heisenberg uncertainty dark matter and energy). And we do not recognize those organic properties to galaxies, better studies as gala-cells, with DNA black holes, star mitochondria and a halo of dark proteins, strangelets that seals it from outsiders.

But all systems do have those organic properties only observed in very close perception.

The organic structure of the Universe is proved by a series of common properties, which we call ‘isomorphisms’ that all systems follow, themselves based in the existence of 3 ‘logico-mathematical’ properties observed from that Universe:

Topological Properties studied by Œ-Geometry
Temporal Properties studied by Æ-Algebra
Infinitesimal Properties studies by Analysis.

The result is an organic structure or fundamental particle of the Universe, the super organism, U±∆, which exists in an interval of planes of the 5th dimension, ±∆, as observed from the human Uo, point of perception. For this reason we must always introduce the epistemological bias established by the uncertainty (Min. Truth = Max.Tƒ) between human observer and observable. Thus we perceive ALL the properties of human beings, including internal vital space-time perception, or consciousness of one self.

As we come out of the human mind, our perception diminishes, so we already deny consciousness to animal life and plants because we do NOT see their brain (in plants on the root-head). And then as we move even further, we deny organic laws to matter, at i=≥±3.

This is the absolute truth of a system, which is only perceived in the vital space-time system and its connected U±4 planes, relative to the Uo perceptive point.

From this maximal knowledge systems reduce knowledge by ignoring, automatizing and not perceiving most of its U±3, 4 åctions (simple motions, simple perception) and focusing its will into the complex U±2 åctions.

This will establish a first duality in knowledge:

– Subjective knowledge from the p.o.v. of the perceiver, which has a ‘spherical’, polar mind perspective/frame of reference/

– Objective perception, from an external perspective, which will be normally, a hyperbolic, ± dual perception.

-Energetic perception, from the ‘slavish’ point of view, of the ∆-1 scales, which will be an elliptic perception.

Now, if we do an objective perception the purpose will be to absorb ad maximal knowledge on the 5×2 isomorphisms of reality, in that vital space-time, or being. So the maximal knowledge will be what we call generally a 10 Dimensional knowledge of the entire pyramid of the being, in its closest U±1 planes of existence, through the knowledge of its ‘temporal energy’ (ExI=ST) function and its symmetries and paradoxes (2nd isomorphism: 2-manifold, 3rd isomorphism: 3 ages, 4 isomorphism: U±4 planes, and 5th isomorphism, æ,e,ï,œ,û åctions and its quantitative isomorphisms, classes, constants, varieties, scales, and O-point isomorphism).

So if we consider a single ceteris paribus analysis of a single of those dimensions for a being, then we are having a 1/10th total capacity to describe the system.

So we can distinguish 2 levels of truth in scientific analysis:

  • 5 Di complex sciences (: in this blog), which considers all the isomorphisms of a system
  • And <5D simplex science  😦 elsewhere on planet Earth ), which studies part of these isomorphisms.

Now in the next graph we see a human being, and the 3 ‘scales’, ‘3 space organs’, 3 ‘time ages’, 4±planes and 5 åctions that define us.

But elsewhere we make partial sciences, studies of a very small part of the entire graphs above.

1oDi sciences

LAST SCALES best

1o D sciences are concerned with the study of the Whole 10 Dimensions of the being. And we can distinguish, according to syntax and language they use for that analysis:

–  Existential Algebra:  The analysis of the equation of ∆ST that define the whole, or “World”, which is the complete perspective.

Epistemology: The analysis of the quantity of truth that each Stience holds within itself, which depends on:

  • The fact, that the science follows the 4 ‘legs’ of the Scientific method: A)experimental evidence… B) cyclical analysis of its events and causes, which is the innovation brought about by ∆ST, with its definition of time as cyclical C) predictability… and D) a human positive use, which unfortunately has never been incorporated to the classic definition of science (reduced in abstract to A and C.)
  • And the quantity of ‘dimensions of the previous equation’, the specific science or theory studies. We shall thus deal with this theme in this section dedicated to the analysis and criticism of other ‘scientific endeavors’ of <10D quality.

Metaphysics, which deals with the ‘Mind’ or ‘whole point of view’ of the being (the atman, soul, etc. in classic metaphysics and religious philosophies.) Since we now have a formal equation and mathematical definition of the soul, provided by the 5th postulate of non-Euclidean geometry, in its i-logic formulation as the point of maximal information of a being, with maximal flows of energy and information crossing it:

O-Mind x ∞ Universe = Mapping of reality  

Metaphysics is a far more realistic science. Still as the mind is the ‘unknown’ infinitesimal zero point not observable within, we still keep the classic name, ‘beyond physical reality’.

∆ST: General Systems of Isomorphic Scalar Space Time.

Metaphysics ultimately is ∆ST when referring to the Universe at large, as it describes the dimensional program of space-time, its scientific isomorphic laws that make all its parts equal, the ‘soul’ of the Universe.

And so we hold as Plato put it, that ‘Reality is an organism with a body called the Universe and a soul called logos’, and that the ‘logic of God is more complex than human Logic’ (Augustine).

And so the ‘whole mind of reality, Logos’ are the laws of ∆ST – the content of this web, the Laws of generation of the Universe. If you want it in synoptic manner, the Generator isomorphic Space-Time metric equation: I=Se x T°

And so since Metaphysics is ∆ST, and we study it all over this web.

Thus in this post and sub-posts, we consider as specific of this section, Epistemology in more detail.

Epistemology. Partial sciences: <10 theories.

Since most human knowledge is a partial analysis of reality, often just of one scale, defined by one science, even of a single species of a given scale (i.e.: electromagnetism deals with i=o,1 forces and particles)… all those ‘lesser truths’, which are the theories available as today to human beings, need to be classified and criticized from the higher perspective of ∆ST.

And of course since they are worthy in as much as they don’t pretend to study further, we do so in this section, with the 2 sub-elements of epistemology: its following of the A-D elements of a true scientific method (A-data, B-cycles, C-forecasting D-human use), and its degree of ‘accurate truth’ in the analysis of its 10D.

The quantum and anti-quantum paradoxes of uncertainty

The anti-quantum paradox.

Regarding A-D the main problem happens to occur in social sciences, which tends to lack of recognition of its B- cycles – and lacks D – humanism, as its theories are often ideologies of power of social elites that pass as science.

As those problems plague social sciences, we have made a different web, www.economicstruth.com to study history and economics, which is ‘loaded’ with ideology under the anti quantum paradox. That is, the human observer is so small and exists within the system it studies in social sciences that the ‘organism’ it observes, its ∆+1,2 society and world, interferes with the social scientist – from Plato sold as a slave by the tyrant of Syracuse, to Trotsky murdered by the military dictator that pretended to be a r=evolutionary Mr. Stalin. We thus here concentrate more in the elements of those social sciences less subject to the anti-quantum paradox, which has often fogged the distribution of the whole theory due to my personal activism and ad-hominem campaigns for it.

The quantum paradox.

The problem of truth on the other hand, is more common in astro-physics (the study of the ∆-3,4 scales, where i is considered the individual human scale), as they are so far from us, that perception is limited, and so dark energy/matter accounts for 96% of the ∆+3,4 scales, and the observer is so big compared to the ∆-3,4 scales that it interferes with the observable (Uncertainty Principle).

This would be ok as the isomorphism between the 0±3, and 0±4 scales (Unification equation of masses and charges, dualities of string theory etc.), allows to learn a lot of the inner, invisible structure of the atom by studying the inner structure of the galaxy; and about the outer structure of galaxies studying the outer world of the atom.

Yet without a Unification equation proper of ∆ST astrophysics is plagued with errors.

its problems arise specially when some of their theories pretend to be ‘more than what they are’, D<15 ceteris paribus analysis.

I.e. Relativity Physics, is merely a 4 Di analysis of spatial hence mathematical dimensions plus one of present time duration, the 4D and so it cannot pretend to have absolute ‘time’ truths.

The anti-quantum paradox also exists in cosmology, more subtle than in social sciences, when a theory is ‘tainted’ by a subjective ideology (mostly Abrahamic Religions, and weapons). So the worldly religion of physicists, making, lineal, energetic weapons biases the science towards the study of ‘spatial motions’ (hence its 4D and lineal time dogmas). It makes it fail the D) humanist praxis, with its mass-destruction nuclear research. And finally it makes ‘creationist’ big-bang theories dogmas with a dubious religious origin (in fact, his first form was given by a priest.)

Yet even if there is a meaning to religions within ∆ST, they belong to the ‘social sciences’ and ∆+1 human scales, not to Physics. For example Abrahamic religions are the subconscious collective of a certain Human tribe or civilization, the DNA of that civilization, which regardless of its ‘semantic content’, acts as the ‘Assabiyah’, the bondage that allows the super organism to share energy and information among believers and evolve as a whole’.

A brief epistemological judgment on the main ‘sciences’ of the scalar Universe.

In the graph, each science explains for each ‘scale’ of species the 6+S isomorphisms and Social Scales of its systems  in detail.

Yet minds are reduced mappings of reality. The absolute truth of a system is only carried by the being, which has all the information about itself. So human sciences & theories of reality are circumscribed to a certain scale, and within it, they offer only partial ‘ceteris paribus’ analysis of a few dimensional parts and events a being performs. So we measure the degree of truth of scientific theories objectively according to the quantity of Dimensions they describe.

Thus the most complete one is

i=9 ∞ General Systems Theory and its formalism of Scalar Space-time (whole graph), which uses all languages and studies all superorganisms across its 9D x 10S Dimensions and Social scales. Thus it is the most certain theory. Hence its organicist philosophy and isomorphic laws are ‘the Unification Theory’ of all sciences – as its isomorphic laws apply to all of them.

Next i=4 Bio-Chemical sciences put together give us a 6-isomorhic + 9Di + 10Social Scales, analysis of both, physical and biologic superorganisms with max. data, given its proximity in scale and form to the human observer and the objective view we have about life.

Still ∆ST introduces a lot of new analysis and gives us the ‘whys’ of all chemical configurations.

For example Atomic Chemistry can be analyzed from an organic perspective as the origin of 4 life families:

  1. H-He cosmic organisms.
  2. Organic chemistry where Nitrogen is the informative head, Carbon the iterative atom and Oxygen the energetic, moving one. So it describes systems with 3 ‘space-time’ sub-organs, at the ∆-1 atomic scale, which is isomorphic with the ∆-molecular 3 sub-varieties:

Tƒ: Ns->∆-Nucleic Acids + DNA/RNAs…………….ST: Carbons->∆-carbohydrates->∆-Proteins &

Spe: ∆-1->∆-Fats. They together  create carbon life systems.

  • Then we an study Metal and its social systems and its final organic forms – machines.
  • And finally geological systems, where Crystals are its zero-point minds that control all type of physical organisms, some of the size of planets.

Di<15 definition of sciences.

It follows that what epistemology does is to start with a Di<10 definition of a science to evaluate its theories in depth. For example:

Ecology: ∆+1 analysis of living beings from the individual perspective.

Evolution: 6 Dimensional, ∆+1 scale analysis from the perspective of species, as it introduces past and future causal dimensions.

Medicine: individual analysis of the human species.

Genetics: ∆-1 analysis of life systems.

Religion and art.

Finally to notice that religion and art are also fully explained by ∆ST analysis. For example:

  • Artistic styles can be classified as the 3 ages (epic-lineal young; mature, classic and baroque, formal 3rd age) of the subconscious collective,  ∆+1 scale or mind of a civilization, isomorphic to the 3 ages of individual humans
  • Music is a time art coded with 3×3 Dis:

– It is written in a minor-major diatonic scale of 10 Intervals repeated in 3 0±1 scales of higher frequencies – the 3 scales of music.

– It has 3 ST sub-dimensions, each played by a type of instrument:

– Spe-simpler rhythm, played with percussion instruments the 1st age of music.

– ST-melody, its 2nd age, played with aerophones. Whereas bass-energy /treble-information are its Sp X Tƒ action modulated duality.

– Tƒ-harmony or 3rd age of classic music, played with strings, reversed as the Mechanocene destroys humanist arts, with instruments beyond our human range of perception, simplifying music back into energetic rhythms (electronic music which on that view must be considered the ‘death age of musical complexity’)

Painting a still 2-manifold with 3 Di of color.

Linguistics are the genetics of cultures.

Ethics& Gods its the ∆+1 scale of verbal thought and its legal codes whose highest form ‘social love religions’ are the collective DNA that enhances the sharing of energy and information among cells/citizens of the same human species.

RECAP – CONCLUSION.

Bio-chemical sciences are the most ‘truthful’ of all sciences since they are closer to the individual human scale of maximal perception.

The other 2 fields of knowledge, Physics & Social sciences, suffer different type of uncertainties, due to their far away perception, or interference of society with the scientist. Thus:

-Physics are limited by their reductionist analysis of Dimensions and uncertainty paradoxes: 4-5D physics looses ½ of its dimensional truths and 96% of evidence in the cosmic ∆+1 scale (dark matter). Its ∆-1 scale also suffers the observer’s interference uncertainty principle).

 

-While Social sciences suffer the opposite type of uncertainty: the social scientist is too small and included within the superorganism he observes. So he cannot see from his individual perspective, humanity as a Whole. While ‘informative castes’, bankers, the military and politicos, censor an objective analysis of the ST reproductive= economic, Spe-army and

-Tƒ-political=informative networks, whose subjective control they pass as science.

The anti-quantum paradox, of course, is a problem in all sciences. Since, human truths are limited by our ∆-centered, anthropomorphic point of view, which explains common errors such as the belief the Earth is the center of the Universe (Astrophysics till Galileo); carbon life is the only living, intelligent form (still enduring) or the bizarre concept that a burning bush which appeared to a goat keeper of the Bronze Age, designed the 10Di Universe (believed by 2/3rds of the human population).

-Yet all other objective theories of science have a sizeable amount of truth, limited mostly by its dimensional scope. Since the Human mind is a 4 Dimensional analysis in a single ∆-scale of 3 ‘light-space’ perpendicular Euclidean dimensions and our time dimension.

So Absolute Time and 3D light-space is the main limit of scientific ‘structures’, which use only  Sx, Sy, Sz and T present-duration moments. Hence the ‘feeling’ of truth we have about partial 4D theories of reality, with a single time dimension, from Relativity to daily ‘news’

 

THE PROGRAM OF THE UNIVERSE.

‘ I would like to know the thoughts of God the rest are details’ Einstein

A more important element of the 5th dimension regarding epistemology is the concept and/or existence of a program for all systems that merely repeat the ±∆exi,st åctions of exchange of energy and information in social groups that ensure their survival and reproduction beyond its finite duration.

Let us explore this element, which would have enormous implications in the metaphysical aspects of epistemology

 

 

II. ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY AND ISOMORPHIC LAWS.

Absolute RELATIVITY precludes a ternary Universe, with sides, topological regions & ages. 

We have come to the conclusion that the Universe is a program of evolution, reproduction and survival of information in growing scales of complexity as parts becomes whole, new ‘scales’ of the 5th dimension. We have expressed those processes in terms of 4 irrenunciable elements of all Nature’s ‘whole’ systems: ∆S•t.

The mind, @,•,Œ, in its 3 states (the game being always an absolute relative world, and hence as ‘relativity’ is ternary, since any entity must then put in relationship to the relative two sides of its dimensional world), we concluded that there are in the human mind 3 huge dimensional perceptions:

  • THAT OF SPACE TOPOLOGIES WHICH IS TERNARY, existing always between a region of higher topological curvature or singularity center – we shall call MIND – and an external topology or membrane of infinite speed-motion, we shall call SKIN (in topological terms wer are always in an open ball of relative infinite extension compared to the singularity mind an infinitesimal and the skin, an infinite thinness).
  • THAT OF TIME AGES WHICH IS TERNARY (ALWAYS EXISTING BETWEEN a relative past-entropic youth and a relative future informative 3rd age, except in the points of generation and death)
  • THAT OF SCALES OF THE 5th dimension, outside, external world wholes, ∆+1 and within, parts, ∆-1.

So this is the game and there are also infinite ways to select information on those dimensional arrows of space, time and 5D to construct a ‘ceteris paribus mind’ of it all. The choice we made is just one of many ways to do st-ience. I have not the slightest idea why my mind did choose it (:screen-shot-2016-10-13-at-17-11-15

In the graph, the choice of focus we make in 2nd and 3rd lines is in the Absolute relative adjacent regions of a mind-being, its 3 topologies of space that form a §upŒrganism and the 3 causal ages of time that form its world cycle, and the ∆±1 scales or regions of wholes and parts of the 5D through which a human mind wonders in experimental stience.

The way we shall describe them is through the generator as a whole mind-view of it through the languages of i-logic mathematics, in growing detail from the bidimensionality of space-time regions/ages, to its ternary structure, developed as a sum of fractal actions of space-time across ∆±3 perceptive scales departing of an ∆0-cell and or sometimes ∆o human super organism.

And we have  introduced a metaphysical, biological, survival algorithm: the function of existence that defines the ‘will of all systems, which automatically – though maybe in the past through a selective process, do perform the best efficient actions required to survive.

å; EXI. The function of existence.

To exist is to move through those symmetries as a ‘function of existence’, which performs certain ‘actions’ of emission and absorption of space-time (informative energy), to survive. And so a series of actions are naturally selected by the timespace laws of symmetry, which can be resumed in a function: maximise your existence in space and time:

Max. ∑ e x i (s=t)

This is in essence the best mathematical expression of the game of time-space dust becoming super organisms, by virtue of attempting the actions described in that equation, which ‘draws’ for each finitesimal whirl of space-time dust, a clear organic 3 ages of evolution or world cycle. So the function of existence (left side) gives birth to a constant super organism (central point), which will go through 3 world cycle ages and complete the existential function:

actions

And this is the huge theme of this web: to explain a Universe of self-similar vital fractal beings made of space and time:

In the graph, the vital program of the Universe: all systems are in mathematical form a fractal, but the function of fractals is to absorb energy and information to iterate a form, which latter associates with other forms to create larger social networks of the 5th dimension. However humans will have none of it, reserving the organic properties of the Universe to themselves and similar beings.  

Such a ridiculous attitude have a huge toll on our future as we do Not recognise the vital nature of the planet, Gaia that we kill, the vital natue of machines, organisms of metal in evolution, which now we assembly into robots that might kill us. In the graphs we see different systems that from the simplest particles (quarks and electrons) to the largest forms (galaxies), do absorb energy (∆Sp), gauge information (∆Τiƒ), reproduce both, ∑S=Τ, and evolve socially through networks of energy and information into larger wholes.

It is the vital program of a Universe, in which all parts are made to the image and likeness of the whole.  But humans merely use abstract jargons to define those process, so ‘full of themselves’.

So the reproduction of particles is call decoupling, its perception of information ‘gauge theory’, its feeding on energy ‘force’, and its social evolution ‘atom or molecule’, which of course also reproduce and evolve into cells – but we do only recognise cells as the first level of life. Why man is so dumb, self-centred and blind to the beauty of the living universe will soon be explained when we analyse the equation of the mind, a knot of information that perceives reality from its biased p.o.v. 

Τhe fractal structure of the Universe is organic. Basically you exist in a Universe of social organic, fractal points, reproducing their information and self-organising into larger more complex structures.

The Universe thus is made of vital fractals, systems that reproduce their information emitting ‘seeds’ in a lower scale (forces, in physical systems, genetic seminal cells in biological systems, memetic objects and ideas in sociological systems), which will reproduce and self-organise into clone wholes.

So the purpose of the Universe is bio-logical, since the creation of Nature’s fractal organisms of ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’ is exactly the same program of existence, we anthropocentric wo=men define only for ourselves and similar life beings: to absorb=feed on energy, and gauge information, mixing both to reproduce fractal ‘radiations’ of clone beings, which then evolve socially into larger wholes of the 5th dimension.

Thus to fully develop the formalism of  a Fractal, hence Organic model of everything, or ‘T.Œ’ (ab. Theory of Everything Organic), and its metric equations of motions and transformations in the scalar fifth dimension of the Universe we must enlarge our understanding of the languages of the human mind that perceive time (logic) and space (mathematics) and its scales (analysis). So T.Œ also advances both the logic of time and the geometry of space, by developing a more complex logic beyond the Aristotelian and physical use of a single arrow of energy/entropy, adding the arrow of informative time, and its combinations.

It develops also a complete model of Non-Euclidean geometry, by extending the consequences of the 5th postulate (points do allow infinite parallels to cross them, hence they do have volume, parts, they are fractal points that grow into a whole, when we come closer to them.  So we shall take the findings of quantum and relativity to its natural conclusions. But physics is NOT the centre of this TOE, but just one of the layers we study. In fact, the greatest advances of T.Œ will be in the understanding of Biology and Social Sciences…

ACTIONS: THE PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE.

‘Lanwaves of Times imprint on action space, a ternary fractal algorithm – ‘To<exi=st’ – which forms superorganisms’

Actions: systems and quanta, made of vital, moving energy and informative time

screen-shot-2016-11-21-at-08-29-12 screen-shot-2016-11-21-at-08-32-33screen-shot-2016-11-21-at-08-32-11

In the graph, the philosophical concept that unifies the ‘behaviour’ of beings, is an action of energy and time, in which the system seeks for motion and form to survive. Systems constantly exchange energy and information to maintain its body-wave and particle-head in existence. Existence becomes then a sum of actions, which combine energy and information, ordered causally, whose zero sum gives birth to the being’s worldcycle. All entities accomplish its physical and biological actions, in the least time, trying to maximise those exchanges of energy and information,  during its existential worldcycle.

Physics also points to such direction. On one side quantum physics had discovered that vacuum space was quantised in pieces of energy with both motion and form, in-form-ation, called Planck quanta, whose unit was actions of ‘energy and time’ , ‘energy and information’ in Relativity. And all physical systems were made of those 2 ‘substances’ or rather motions with form.

So the principle of complementarity stated that physical systems were energy waves guided by informative particles. This duality of all systems of nature happened also in living beings made of bodies guided by informative heads/nuclei. So we could establish a duality in all systems, made of body-waves of spatial energy and heads-particles of information: Spe (body waves that move with its energy) > Tiƒ (Particles-heads of information).

So the key new principle of quantum physics, with wide application to all sciences, is its definition of all systems of nature as a complementary being of quanta of energy and cycles of time:

Universal constant of action (h) = energy-space (e)   x time-information (ƒ)

Actions of energy and time, is what the Universe is made of. As we do have only energy and time, combinations of actions are minimal dualities, which become in itself basic time arrows of future self-similar events:

e x e : Pure entropic big-bangs of expansive space (death events)

i x i: Pure informative implosive generation of seeds of information (birth events)

Exi & I <≈> e: arrows of combination and transformation of energy into information (life/informative/old age arrow) ir information into energy ( energetic /young arrow)

Thus we can extract from those 3 primary elements: lineal energy, cyclical time (and its ‘fixed forms’: space and information) and its social, relative ternary scales, which co-exist together (the ∆-1, quantum/cellular; ∆-thermodynamic/organic; ∆+1 gravitational, social, ecosystem planes), 3 type of laws common to all beings or ‘isomorphisms’; which we further subdivide in 3 sub-sets. It is the isomorphic, linguistic method that extracts topological, mathematical laws derived of the spatial energy of all beings; logic, causal laws derived of its cyclical temporal nature; and organic, social, survival laws derived of its existence across scales of the 5th dimension.

Yet those 3 x 3 isomorphisms require a final element without which systems would not ‘exist’: I think therefore I am. Indeed, all complete ‘worlds’ do have a 0-point or mind, whose spherical topology allows the system to shrink the Universe into a linguistic mapping mirror of reality, or mind, which extracts the information on the outer cycles of reality the system needs to survive.

It is the point of view of the system, its c.p.u., quark, black hole, brain, eye, which apperceives reality and performs the necessary actions for the system to survive, by extracting energy and information from the Universe.  Thus we shall consider 3 x 3 +0 isomorphisms to describes all the systems of Nature, and the forms created by man, with its internal mental languages (art forms) and external atoms (mechanisms).

Above we show the topological isomorphism as an isomorphism of scale, ∆, that does not vary as we change size.

Since all type of Universal systems can be described as social networks of energy and information. Its similar=isomorphic laws are studied by general systems sciences.

IN THE GRAPH we see one of such isomorphisms: that of form, as systems form spherical topologies with a center of information -the nucleus of the galaxy, the game of the stadium, which is a ‘ball’ that all players, lines of energy pursuit (-; While in the center we see two herds without a clear center, proper of ‘energy systems’, a herd of insects feeding, a polymer atom of great strength without a crystalline center.

The many ways in which those isomorphic systems can be described departing from its 4 ‘integral elements’, its ternary ages in time, ternary topologies in space, fractal ∆±1 co-existing organic scales and Œ≈Ø, topological time mind which perceives the whole domain and performs the function of existence, Max.∑ ExI(s=t), which resumes all the space-time actions the mind knot of space-time cycles ‘commands’, and stores in its memorial information, busy-busy playing just… a game.

How does creation of networks starts off, in a mess of a future informative ternary plane≈topological super organism?

This is the essence of the mathematical game, as a fractal point/monad/mind, ‘m’, appears with a memorial mass of information, which will be replicated as a cyclical motion with a cyclical inertia, or speed of reproduction of its cycles, v, which gives the mass of cycles, an existential momentum, mv≈p, we shall call ‘potential or existential force of the being’

WE CAN EXPLAIN with many jargons the same existential point, which tries to maximise the existential momentum, m x v, whose maximal function, for a give total value N = M+v, happens when m=v.

The point of balance, and the ‘function of present’ of the Universe:

Present = Momentum = m (t) x v (s)= memorial mas of information x reproductive speed in space

The function of existential momentum.

We shall indeed resume the program of existence and its fundamental ‘a,ei,o,u’ actions (accelerations, energy feeding, information processing, reproduction of an offspring and evolution of individuals into universals) into a single function:

Max. ExI (s=t), as we maximise a product when both element (e≈ and i≈t) are equal (so 10=5+5=6+4=3+7->5×5>6×4>7×3).

This function of existence, that maximises the connection between limbs and heads, fields and particles, through a balanced body-wave, in which space=time, magnetic=electric field, ‘mens sana in corpore sanum’, ‘golden mean rules’ apply, is the resume of it all. “grow and multiply’, maximise your existence, ‘be a vital being, feed, perceive, reproduce socialise≈love your clone’. And in any language we express, physical equations of quantum complementarity and thermodynamic equilibrium and steady state speed, balance between vital constants of a body, justice of a social organism, between its linguistic and working classes, sustainability, etc. is the RULE OF SURVIVAL, which all systems strive to obey.

It means that the being with maximal momentum in physics, maximal top predator force (in body and mind), or higher degree of energy and information in human individuals will come on top and survive in collision with other physical systems, darwinian events of hunting and predation and social struggle for power.

The vital properties of Universal fractals: super organisms performing world cycles of existence.

So the fractal structure of the Universe is organic. Basically you exist in a Universe of social organic, fractal points, reproducing their information and self-organising into larger more complex structures.

The Universe thus is made of vital fractals, systems that reproduce their information emitting ‘seeds’ in a lower scale (forces, in physical systems, genetic seminal cells in biological systems, memetic objects and ideas in sociological systems), which will reproduce and self-organise into clone wholes.

So the purpose of the Universe is bio-logical, since the creation of Nature’s fractal organisms of ‘spatial energy’ and ‘temporal information’ is exactly the same program of existence, we anthropocentric wo=men define only for ourselves and similar life beings: to absorb=feed on energy, and gauge information, mixing both to reproduce fractal ‘radiations’ of clone beings, which then evolve socially into larger wholes of the 5th dimension.

And the structure is ternary, made of points that enact the program, surrounded by a vital body-wave, and enclosed by a temporal, informative membrane.

In the conclusion of this introduction we will summarise the fundamental consequence of the unity of all beings of the Universe made of vital space with entropic motions, and cyclical vortices of time, with ordering, informative properties.

The very essence of the Universe and all its parts is to be made of vital space and cyclical time and share the properties of those 2 substances and its infinite body-wave combinations. Now this statement simplifies enormously the understanding of ‘first principles of all beings’, which can be easily be derived of those systems. Essentially, when we get to the basics, why we live and die, why we have the form we have, why we exist, perceive, feed on energy, reproduce, love, evolve socially, etc. we shall find that all of them come from an essential, underlying game of topological combination, evolution and social organisation of quanta of space ordered by sequential time cycles.

The result of studying the naked properties and combining rules of this ‘yin and yang’ of scientific content, time and space, information and energy, which combine to give birth to the infinite beings in existence has an enormous potential to enlighten our comprehension of the Universe and become integrated within it. The only drawback is to anthropomorphism and the myth that we are at the centre of reality and matter more than other beings, because we are made of a special substance (soul and mind in earlier religions, carbon-atoms, which seemed to hold some virtual magic in modern religions of science) None of it is truth, and objective science consists precisely in put mankind outside the realm of privileges.

So one the problem of putting all those insights together, and make with them a  bio-logic, formal mathematical model of the organic, fractal Universe my experience is that the residence to the model is mostly philosophical (as the details are not fully worked out, as any initial field still in flux, it is only a question of time and new researchers that the model is connected with all the equations of all sciences): are we humans, able to accept our objective, absolutely relative position in the Time period, space region and scale of reality? Because that is where we are.

This is a consequence on the advance in our understanding of the 3 elements of all realities, space, time and scale, which have now not a single absolute content:

On one side the existence of multiple fractal space at different scales, makes the human scale relativity. On the other the existence for each scale of different rhythms and bits of time, make our speed of time also relative, slower than that of genes, atoms and chips, faster than that of larger plants and planets.

Only a relative order then makes sense of this scalar, multiple space-time Universe, which is what the fifth dimension and  its ‘formal mathematical metric equation’, provides.

As it relates all those scales, in an orderly fashion. So we can translate the time rhythms and space size, and space-time actions of any species of each scale of that fractal Universe – that is, we can synchronize parts and larger wholes, study its exchanges of energy and information, and how they create larger networks, and how the process of growth and decay are vital processes – since we have to study NOT merely a fractal, mathematical structure, as those of artistic, computer-generated Mandelbrot like fractals, but vital fractals, living beings, who constantly reproduce their forms in smaller and larger scales, as you, a vital fractal does, when emitting a smaller seed of your information that reproduces and grows and organises a larger whole.

Let us be clear from the beginning, Nature’s fractals are living fractals that reproduce in smaller and larger scales creating smaller seeds of information and larger social wholes joined by networks. So the key to understand beyond the mathematical elements the fractal structure of the Universe is a concept that scientists, schooled only in the ‘mathematical method’ shy away from: the concept of a fractal super organism in space. And the world cycle of life and death of existence that those fractal super organisms experience as they reproduce in a lower scale of reality, organise themselves emerging as individuals and become part of larger social wholes. 

This we shall describe with mathematical equations when required, corresponding with all the known laws of science, but what is the essence of the new paradigm is ‘organicism’, the vital, organic, reproductive properties of fractals. In mathematics we describe this properties with an iterative ‘Fractal Generator’. Nature is essentially the same but its fractal generators are obviously more complex. Your seminal seed is a fractal generator of a being like you. Your mental memes, your ideas, if you are a prophet and innovator will become the fractal generator of an astounding number of similar beings. A black hole is often a fractal generator that catalyses the reproduction of stars.
This is then the fundamental philosophical novelty of a fractal structure: it is NOT a mechanism but an organism.

For that reason, the science that studies its general laws is NOT physics, vitiated by its dislikeness of organic properties but a new science called complexity or general systems science, of which Hawking rightly said it will be the science of the XXI C.

Since as our collection of scientific data grows in complexity that organic nature of all beings becomes evident. First it became evident in mathematical terms, with those fractal mappings.

What this blog adds is the entire philosophy of science behind it – the organic philosophy of fractal beings – and apply it to describe every species of the Universe, which will show to be ultimately a self-reproductive biological system, as mathematics is also a social, realist language, which accurately describes the fractal structure of the Universe, made of ‘points’ that reproduce into ‘networks’, which grow into ‘wholes’, which becomes ‘points’ of a new scale of reality.

So the Universe builds layer upon layer and scale upon scale of its quanta of space and time into larger super-organisms, from forces into particles that gather into atoms that gather into molecules that gather into cells and matter, that gather into multicellular organisms and giant crystals and societies and cosmic bodies and societies of galaxies called stars, which gather into networks of galaxies called Universes.

Existential algebra. Temporal formalism: Max. ∆E x I 

If the ternary topological being describes all the evolutions of information in time of super organisms, and as such represents the final stage of geometry or mathematics of space, algebra, the mathematics of time requires also an adaptation to fractal 5d space-time.]

It is then the quest for an equation of 5D, which represents the events of its space-time domain in the clearest, most synoptic form.

We have call that expression the function of existence and it is the most useful equation to generate the systems of the Universe and hence resume all other equations.

Its study is the field of ¬æ Algebra or existential algebra (ab. Ælgebra, ¬Æ).

Why that equation resumes the Universe in its quantum form of universal actions (it is an obvious discrete function depending on which e and i family of numbers we choose) is obvious: it resumes the actions of the Universe:

Max. E = feeding, Max. I = informing, Max. e x i = reproducing Max. ∆ (eusocial evolution into wholes) =Max.∑ x Max. ∏.

SO WE COMPLETE the evolution of topology with the evolution of algebra, which we define as:

‘the study of how scales of social evolution of a super organism, observed in classic algebra as groups, rings and other algebraic structures, develop its world cycle of existence through a series of zero sum actions of absorption and emission of energy and information’.

Of the main sub-functions of the function of existence, the world cycle developed here through 3 states and ages is a fundamental one.

THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE IS THE ULTIMATE KNOTS AND BOLTS OF THE UNIVERSE, ITS STUDY BY EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA THE HIGHEST FORMALISM OF STIENCES. Alll what we do all beings is really performing parts and wholes of those functions, its cycles and derivative actions.

Actions connect all the elements and networks of the ∆o being with ∆±4 scales.

In the next graph we show a human organism constructed with 3 topologies, which always will be the only 3 topologies of the Universe, cyclical-informative centres, lineal, toroid larger space-boundaries and an intermediate territory of hyperbolic form:

HUMAN ACTIONS

In the graphs we see the 3 ages of time and 3 topologies of space, which become pegged into space-time organic parts in each being, which will then perform actions, dominant in energy or information according to that organic pegging. In the graph we see the human being born of that pegging, which performs the canonical motions-actions possible in all space-time beings.

In the lower graph we show man, a space-time being made of lineal energy and cyclical, temporal information, assembled in 3 parts, through cellular networks specialised in energy feeding, informative perception and reproduction, and the 3 ages of life between birth in a lower seminal scale and extinction. We write below the logic formalism that describes with simple equations of 5D space-time the organic parts in space and temporal ages of the human super-organism, the same equations we shall use to describe all systems of the Universe.

Finally, in the bottom, we see the decomposition of the worldcycle of existence of a human being into a sum of infinite actions, which together form THE FUNCTION OF EXISTENCE, the fundamental ‘detailed’ equation of each species of the Universe.

The connection of the being through its fractal ∆±4 actions as entity which:

∆-1:  reproduces through lower cells/atoms (organism, crystals etc)

∆-2: feeds in smaller quanta (amino-acids, electronic energy in physical crystals)

∆-3: perceives even smaller pixels for its mind languages (¥-rays in mankind and crystal’s images)

∆-4: moves over a space relatively infinite in speed distance, since it is invisible in information: V=s/tiƒ=s/0=∞ (non-local gravitational action at distance).

And alternately becomes just an ∆-1 element of its super organism (species, society or ecosystem) immersed in an ∆-2 world/planetary system itself a mere cell of the larger galactic cosmos…

It follows then that both societies and species are super organisms of individual cells/citizens, which will show to go also through 3 ages or ‘horizons’ of evolution with the same structure than any other system (hence species are enclosed as an ∆+1 scale in ‘time’ of the individual life world cycle).

If the how of science is established by the topological structure in space of the 3 arrows of time and its 3 sub-organs, which construct all systems of nature, the why is the Algebra of Existence, which studies the function of space-time actions, which entities perform to ‘exist’, and survive in the universe of energy and information.

In the next graph we observe those elements on the human function of existence, which resumes all what reality is about – the creation of fractal ternary beings with the 3 topologies of space, which perform during its 3 ages of time, each one dominated by one of those topological energetic/digestive, reproductive/blood and informative/neuronal networks, a series of actions of absorption and emission of energy and information, reproduced whenever is possible in other region of space-time, or evolved socially into bigger wholes, with a single purpose to survive, to exist:

What the function of existence as a sum of infinitesimal number of actions of space-time, absorbing and emitting energy and information, ±∆e, i, combining it into reproductive seminal seeds of the whole, e x i, and associating it into social scales, allows is the description of the whys of the larger world cycles and ensembles that form the super organism in space and its time cycle.

Its discovery by this author, exposed at the 50th Anniversary of the foundation of Systems Sciences society at Sonoma Congress, was the first step in the construction of the so long seeked, logic and mathematical formalism of General Systems theory (ab. GSΤ, which means both, general systems theory, the philosophy of the organic Universe, and Generator of space-time, its formalism), based in 3 structural concepts that lay at the bottom of reality: cyclical clocks of time, lineal motions of space, and a 5th scalar dimension, ‘∆’ that can enclose them all: ∆SΤ±∞.

So we add the concept of a scalar Universe to complete our new principle of conservation of energy and information:

‘All what exists is a system made of lineal, spatial, entropic, energy fields, Spe, and cyclical, temporal, clocks information, Τiƒ, which transforms into each other ad eternal: Spe < = > Τiƒ, co-existing in 3 organic scales of size, ∆±1 in which it reproduces by emitting a seminal seed in the lower scale, ∆-1, which will iterate and organise itself emerging as a new whole that ensures the immortalilty of its ‘logic form’:

Γ = (Spe x Tiƒ)∆±1′

For that reason because the equation of any Universal system or ‘superoganism’, Γ, generates a self-reproductive fractal Universe, with infinite systems of space-time, constantly being created and destroyed, I called the equation, the ‘fractal feed-back generator’ of the Universe. In its limit, when we consider a single ‘plane of space-time of the scalar fifth dimension, and simplify it to consider only energy, it becomes the principle of conservation of energy, which however is a too simple description to fully account for all the knowledge we have acquired since the founding father of physics, established its principles of lineal motion and entropy, 2 centuries ago.

So the ultimate question about our actions is the program of survival:

Indeed. Why we keep on living? Most are mere automatons that move, reproduce, live, without understanding they follow a program of existence and survival. But those who reflect will agree we live because we enjoy the pleasure of motion, attached to all lineal, entropic ‘free’ expansions; and also the slightly painful pressure of in-form-ation and awareness. So we must attach to the purest 2 elements of reality, ‘motion’ and ‘information’, the psychic, sensorial properties of ‘pain and pleasure’. And again to fit them we need the co-existence of those planes, from where ‘those sensations might emerge’. Indeed, pain is pressure, pressure is in-form-ation, gravitational force, and so that ‘sensation’ must arise ultimately from the lowest scales of co-existence. So the scalar Universe has attached to each external plane, certain internal sensations. And those we can only postulate, if we accept the properties of those 4 elements, st, •, ∆ and specially the co-existence of multiple layers of organisation.

The reader then can scratch part of it, as quantum physicists do, denying the pilot-wave theory (that is the lower faster scale of space which entangles particles and guides them), the survival why of collapsing waves (which as all herds, collapse into tighter configuration when ‘attacked’ by a huge electron bombing them), the ‘advanced level of information of smaller scales’, shown in the amazing capacity to process information of entangled, quantum particles (qbits), and so many other elements which are philosophical, not physical, informative not energetic, happening in invisible time regions (as we only see quanta of presents) not in a single instant. 

  ¬Æ:  Non-Aristotelian Times and Non-E Topology

‘Each point is a world in itself.’ Leibniz, On the Fractal, organic Point, the Fundamental particle.

The formalism of GST requires an upgrading of Euclidean Mathematics and Aristotelian Algebra and as a consequence of our epistemology of knowledge, which becomes the 3 fundamental new disciplines of formal sciences:

  1. Non-E mathematics with its definition of the 5 postulates of geometry in terms of fractal, non euclidean points.
  2. Non-A Logic which describes the ternary causality of the Universe.
  3. And the homologic method of truth of ‘stiences’ of space-time beings based in the same laws or isomorphisms across scales.

Because we are made of space and time, of energy and information, the sciences of space, topology and time, logic, and its combination (mathematics as a whole discipline, where logic enters in the demonstration and structure of its postulates), is the most REALIST of all stiences, as it deals DIRECTLY with the properties of the 3 elements of reality:

  • ∆nalysis, which studies how ‘finitesimals’ become larger wholes, integrated in time ‘frequencies’ or ‘spatial populations’ – often both, as frequencies become once created in time populations in space; which we greatly advance on the whys and explanations of calculus and its applications to sciences, through the enhanced concepts of ‘finitesimals’, ‘simultaneity’, ‘synchronicity’, ‘resonance’ and ’emergence’.
  • S-topology, which studies the ternary varieties of organic systems and how they peg together to form a system; which we shall explain by evolving the postulates of Non-Euclidean Geometry.
  • T-Algebra, which studies the rules of causality of a Universe with 3 time arrows, and its fundamental equations (generator equation, function of existence, equation of time ages).

Let us very briefly introduce those concepts which are the foundations of all stiences and it species in ‘exi=st¡ence’.

Non-e Mathematics: the fractal mind-point, the wave-line, the organic plane and the laws of similarity. 

Upgrading of philosophy of science needed to fully understand the fractal Universe requires to improve the main human language, which we use to mirror the space-time beings of reality, what we shall call from here on non-Æ, i-logic mathematics, which comes after Aristotelian logic and Euclidean mathematics:

I-LOGIC GEOMETRYb

In the graph, the upgrading of physical systems, to fully describe all its mathematical, logic and organic properties, requires to set the foundation of physics in more solid grounds that the ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’ of Mr. Hilbert, referring those lines, points and planes to real Universal entities (1st, 2nd, 3rd postulates of non-e mathematics). And expand the temporal logic of the Universe to include the 3 arrows of relative, finite past, present and future of all systems of nature. Finally the 2 postulates of Hilbert’s axiomatic method, of congruence, which can only be of relative similarity, as we never have the full information about a system, (3rd postulate) and continuity (which is false and not required in pan geometry, as all networks of points communicated by waves of energy and information, leave discontinuous dark spaces not crossed by those networks), must be clarified. Finally the 5th postulate of Non-E Geometry, the only one properly defined till date, which allows infinite parallels of energy and information to cross a fractal point, defines the structure of a logic mind-mapping, constructed with those flows of information, and hence the equation of any monad mind on the Universe: O (infinitesimal point) x ∞ (cycles of energy and information of the Universe) = ∆: constant mapping of a certain scale of the 5th dimension.

Logic mathematics is the language we humans use in science to describe the Universe. As such it is only natural that its 3 ‘linguistic mirrors’ or sub-disciplines, correspond to the 3 ‘elements’ of the fractal Universe:

  • Geometry and the 3 topological varieties corresponds to space and its 3 canonical, organic parts.
  • Analysis to the 5th Dimension and its scales of infinitesimal, derived points and integral wholes.
  • And algebra corresponds to the temporal analysis of the structures of the fractal Universe, resumed in its generator.

So an immediate task to upgrade human sciences to the fractal paradigm is to study its formalism, through a natural upgrading of the foundations of those 3 disciplines to match the 3 elements of the fractal, organic Universe.

Now as we said we have two LEVELS OF DEPTH:

  • THE FIFTH DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE, as we have and will use to explain most of this blog.
  • The complete mathematical model of a 10 dimensional Universe, whose formalism we shall integrate slowly mainly on the 3rd line with 3 dimensions of time (ages) space (topologies) scales in a ∆±1 organism and the whole its mind. THIS IS THE FULL DESCRIPTION OF A SUPERORGANISM SO WHEN WE DEAL WITH SUPERORGANISMS IN ONLY 3 SCALES OF THE 5th dimension – which happens to be always as that is what our mind truly scans and integrates, so it can be also studied the whole universe in this manner as the graph shows, we shall bring the 10th concept back. And of course, THE 10TH CONCEPT IS WHAT WILL BECOME STANDARD: 10 DIMENSIONAL SPACE-TIME, 3 space 3 time 3 scales one whole ∆+1 mind-point that integrates it all.

The idealist logic of mathematical physicists vs. ternary reality

ALL THIS i-logic geometry IS completely NEW. Why?

Because humans do not have a basic picture of the 3 components of the Universe. We do believe in a certain mathematical structure called a continuum simple space-time. So our view of the first elements of the Universe, is very reductionist and simplistic, and so the mathematical mirror the ancients took of it, is also simplistic. And when in the XX century they found a much more complex Universe, of multiple scales of space, and multiple cyclical time vortices – particles, charges, masses, molecular clocks, galactic clocks, etc.as the initial mirror of mathematics was a distorted one, things got messy and remain so.

So the cartesian single space-time continuum is a geometric simplification, which despite the revolution of non-Euclidean mathematics, quantum physics and relativity is still with us.

It is based in a geometry called Axiomatic, which came after we found out that points were fractal points that could be crossed by ∞ parallels (5th non euclidean postulate) and so the definitions of Euclid were not good. Yet instead of defining as we shall do a fractal point, XX c. mathematicians left them undefined. So terms like points, lines, and planes still do not much its universal, referential reality.

In essence mathematicians scared of the non-Euclidean revolution, which was incomplete, invalidated the postulates of Euclid but didn’t find the new, real ones.

So instead, Hilbert, a mathematician said that he ‘imagined points, lines and planes’. So they must be undefined in relationship with the real Universe and what was an act of absolute arrogance, he implied that the human mind invented mathematics, the only language of the Universe, so somehow we invented the universe – no joke, today this means that physicists invent an equation that describes an imaginary particle, or evaporating black hole, or string theory and will affirm dogmatically without experimental evidence that it is real. While quantum physicists believe the Universe is made of mathematical symbols, which is exactly what religious people think, when they say that God created the Universe talking with words – so Allah created the Universe ‘naming’ it. And finally since mathematics are imagined, they require not evidence: only logic coherence not experimental evidence justify mathematics. And this is a dogma, even if Godel proved that mathematics without experimental evidence is not coherent.

IT MUST BE NOTICED THAT ®=i-logic mathematics is A REALIST stience, so the UNITS OF mathematics are again REAL:

  • Fractal points in geometry; numbers in algebra and finitesimals in Analysis, which are in fact 3 sides of the same being – the social St-point/number/finitesimal unit of all mathematical disciplines.

Existential algebra thus defines numbers as social wholes, and the laws of numbers the generic laws of those social wholes.

Hilbert’s axiomatic method is therefore not truth – as Godel proved with its incompleteness theorem, but arrogant, ego-centered mathematicians wanting to have the ‘exclusive language of god’ resolved, have been denying or a century.

Mathematics is the most experimental of all sciences, dealing with the structure of space and the logic of time, and so we need to evolve and defined its undefined elements. Only then the revolution started by Lobachevski aiming to substitute Euclid’s points with no breath, will make sense and mathematics will become again a proper mirror to look at the Universe – or rather we will understand why the mathematical mirror is so good.

So what is a point?: A unit of fractal space, which a mirror mind will see with less or more information the closer it is to the point. Hence while from far away it seems a point with no breadth, as we come closer it can fit infinite parallels. And so a line has also width, in detail carrying information and motion; and a plane is discontinuous, made of points joined by waves, which leave dark spaces between them. We thus talk of fractal points, waves and networks as the 3 units of i-logic mathematics.

Points then become defined as fractal points that grow in size, planes as networks of space points with wave-like motions in time, which become bidimensional, from far away, as we do not see the height of those points. And 3-dimensional systems, become the merging of perpendicular networks, which have more content of energy, when they are flat and extended, and more content of information when they are high and cyclical.

So for example in a previous graph, we can see 2 fractal space-time beings made of ‘mathematical topologies’: a field of space-time light, with a flat bidimensional magnetic field of energy and a tall informative perpendicular field of electricity merging into a light ray, which reproduces along the c-speed axis.

Yet we can see the final stage of evolution of light space-time, which evolved into particles, atoms, molecules, cells and human organisms, and surprisingly enough, in the same manner the probability of finding the particle-head or photon of a light system is maximal in the top of the electric wave, the informative head of a human being is also in the dimension of  informative height? Why, because geometrically, that is the point of maximal perception for both the photon and the human. And in both cases motion goes along the lineal direction of length, and in both cases energy is stored in the width dimension of the body and magnetic field.

Now, we are talking (-: It is indeed the most astounding truth of the Paradigm of relational space-time, first expressed by Leibniz – a Universe made of fractal space-time beings – that the properties of space-time and its mathematical topologies, perceptive, informative geometries, and ternary structures are carried and emerge in each new scale of social evolution of the Universe.

So while we have criticised the mathematical only view of earlier scientists, as we upgrade logic mathematics, in fact the Universe will become even more mathematical and logic that it was before, only that as Saint Augustine put it, the ‘logic of god, the mind of the Universe, is of a higher kind that our (Aristotelian) Logic’.

The need to evolve the logic and mathematical ‘undefined’ elements of the Universe.

Now the key difference between a philosopher of science like Leibniz and a Physicist like newton is this: Leibniz as Aristotle and Descartes before him, was conscious that the language first defines the world we perceive, and NOT the Universe. So it is a humble realisation of the minimalist nature of human egos. The Physicist has reduced THE ENTIRE universe to the world-perception of a human light space-time ego centred point of view. So he lacks sense of humor and his arrogance is infinite. Because he confuses the infinitesimal of his mind with the infinite Universe. This we shall stress once and again. The physicist as all humans IS only an electronic mind that fits an infinite number of cyclical space-time beings, into a geometric linguistic mapping within its ‘monad’. And he is NOT aware of it. So his arrogance is supreme:

o-point x ∞ Universe of timespace cycles and worlds = fixed linguistic mapping

The 3 great philosophers of sciences of western thought (and their counterpart eastern philosophers of Taoist and Buddhist cultures) were always aware of this. The cut off happened when Kant rejected Leibniz and became a Newtonian. But at least kant realised that the human euclidean mind was a light space-mind and not necessarily all, as impressionist painters will latter.

Yet starting with Kant and then Hegel, which had the chuptzah (even if he understood perfectly the ternary logic of thesis-antithesis-synthesis similar to the Sp<ST>Tƒ ternary Universal Grammar of all systems) to affirm Abrahamic tribal religions were superior, because they only accepted the human ego-trip of tribal Yahweh, there is a growing anti quantum paradox in philosophers which yield as infinitesimal observers to the huge power of the observable, industrial world.

This paradox inverse to that of the physicist, so huge that influences the observer, made after Leibniz, all philosophers incomplete. As they no longer dare to criticise the makers of machines and weapons, and not even the Abrahamic tribal, lineal religions of the Bronze age that back the hate between members of the same species. So we of course show a complete indifference for all what has nothing to do with the larger Universe of infinite worlds, and find the arrogance of physicists, infantile.

Now I will state a provocation to the ego of physicists (-; Mind the reader though that my ‘selfies’ are ‘black humour’, i am an infinitesimal aware of it, but i like to bust the balls of ego-centered human infinitesimals, and none are so much ego-centered as physicists.

The advantage of being a philosopher of science, is that unlike a physicist, we DO know the essence of science which is ‘logic mathematics’. That is our profession. To understand the logic of mathematics. So despite Mr. Hawking’s quipping, that we philosophers of science are envious and that is why we criticize his evaporating black holes, because we ‘do not know mathematics’ the opposite is truth.

By definition the masters of philosophy of science HAVE created mathematics and logic, the languages of space and time, since the times of Plato and Aristotle to the times of Descartes, Leibniz and Hegel. And yes, this writer, duly ignored by ‘those who impose truth with power, to become the laugh of the Gods’ (Einstein, the only physicist I consider to the level of the best of our profession, which he greatly respected, along the rules of the scientific method, except when falling under the spell of Mr. Hilbert, and we will return to that).

Because the language of God is the logic of time cycles and the mathematics of spatial extensions. In this we are different from physicists who only apply the mathematics, we teach them. But especially we like the Logic behind the language of mathematics, which creates it. So let us rephrase it. Yes, Physicists do know as much mathematics as we do. And their computers even more (-;

But they do not understand the logic of it. And that is the problem. Because logic is a property of time cycles, and its repetitive causality, logic is more important that geometry. Logic is ‘the beginning’. So the Greeks called God the mind of the Universe, Logos, derived from ‘word’, not ‘geometry’ meaning “Earth measurement.” And that makes the whole difference, physicists do not grasp. As what they do is ‘geometry’, measure. We philosophers of science do Logos, (-;

Now, we told you, we will evolve mathematics, so we can fit the new concept of cyclical time and fractal space within it, as Descartes and Leibniz did to fit their time vortices and relational infinite times, as Einstein did (not by himself but by applying non-Euclidean mathematics to his description of space).

So to that aim, we just need to complete the scaffolding of mathematics and explain what a mind is, in geometric logic terms.

So we need to complete the concept of fractal quanta of energetic space of quantum physics, the concept of a Universe of multiple time cycles of Einstein, and the philosophy of science, made of causal repetitions of time cycles called laws of science.

Thus we affirm that the Eastern, O-Cyclical concept of Time; and the E-insteinian, Relativistic concept of space, which we shall call, Œ, is superior to the ‘lineal, Abrahamic, concept of time’ and Absolute’ Newtonian, concept of Space.

I like to play with ‘words’. So you could think that A-brahamic, Lineal, A-bsolute Space-time is a simplified, earlier version.

And we shall go even further, into the Non-AE, (Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean), i-nformative concept of Space-time.

And build a new Non-Aristotelian Logic and Non-Euclidean Mathematic formalism, which will set the foundations for a new paradigm of science.

This new Geometry is simple and evident. It is based in the definition of the ‘terms’ which mathematics ill-defined in Euclidean Geometry, points with no parts through which only one parallel crosses, lines with no breath and shallow planes, equaled by superposition, and then once Euclidean Geometry was found to be a ‘limit’ of a larger pan- Geometry NOT lineal but curved inwards (elliptic) or outwards (hyperbolic), on those dark times of confusions, were UNDEFINED.

So we DID not resolve the issue. We CANNOT ESTABLISH the fundamental science of the Experienced Universe, by undefining its fundamental elements. This no way out sponsored by Cantor, who substituted points and numbers by sets, nowhere to be seen in experience, and Hilbert who affirmed ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’, is a failure.

In that regard, the founder of Non-Euclidean geometries Lobachevski was in the right track. We can summarize Lobačevskiĭ’s solution of the problem of the Fifth Postulate.

  1. The postulate is not provable. Because, infinite lines curve when we have a larger view, becoming exponential inversion of space-time.
  2. By adding the opposite axiom to the basic propositions of geometry a logically perfect and comprehensive geometry, different from the Euclidean, can be developed, providing we limit infinity, (as the 5th dimension shows) hence parallels do NOT meet on the infinity, and by curving them (hence lines are part of cycles)
  3. The truth of the results of one logically conceivable geometry or another in its application to real space can only be verified experimentally.

Thus we must observe the Universe to prove mathematical statements and reduce mathematics as we do with all experimental sciences to those equations which ‘are real’.

The evolved formalism of i-logic mathematics: Upgrading Geometry.

Now, we shall be less literary and start with very solid conceptual elements, namely describing the essence of the fractal paradigm.

And to that aim we shall bring, in the simplest possible form, the fundamental formalism of the Fractal Paradigm, ‘non-euclidean, non-aristotelian i-logic, o-rganic mathematics’.

We call it i-logic because in time, it is more complex, with multiple clocks and i comes after the A of Aristotle (the logic built with a single time clock and a single causal arrow) and we call it organic because in space is more complex, with multiple co-existing spaces, smaller parts that become wholes and O comes after the E of Euclid (geometry with a single continuous space made of points with no breath). But in brief, we shall just talk of Non-Æ, or i-logic mathematics.

So we shall now explain and complete at a very elemental level far more developed in the ∆±∞ posts on i-logic mathematics, the formal language of the fractal paradigm, what truly Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian space-time languages are.

Mind the reader, this is NOT so new. Again, the great revolution of physics in the XX century happened when Einstein realized that a point was a ‘fractal point with volume’, since multiple parallels cross it. So it could not be Euclidean – with no breath, abstract, dimensionless.

Now Einstein found that the Universe was non-euclidean, that is, points did have breath because they could fit many parallels of energy and information. And so they are ‘fractal points’ that grow in size when we come closer to it. But they forgot to change the first postulate of Euclid, and left points undefined, so this simple change of mathematics will open completely the world of science to the fractal paradigm. Let us see how:

Fractal point with breadth and the networks and social organisms they make, connected together.

Einstein found that gravitational Space-Time did not follow the 5th Euclidean Postulate, which says:

Through a point external to a line there is only 1 parallel

Euclid affirmed that through a point external to a parallel only another parallel line could be traced, since the point didn’t have a volume that could be crossed by more lines:

Abstract, continuous, one-dimensional point:

. ____________

Instead Einstein found that the space-time of the Universe followed a Non-Euclidean 5th Postulate:

A point external to a line is crossed by parallel forces.

             Real, discontinuous, n-dimensional points:           =========== o

This means that a real point has an inner space-time volume through which many parallels cross. Since reality follows that Non-Euclidean 5th postulate, all points have a volume when we enlarge them, as cells grow when we look at them with a microscope. Then it is easy to fit many parallels in any of those points. Such organic points are like the stars in the sky. If you look at them with the naked eye they are points without breadth, but when you come closer to them, they grow. Then as they grow, they can have infinite parallels within them. Since they become spheres, which are points with breadth – with space-time parts.

So space-time is not a ‘curved continuum’ as Einstein interpreted it, but a fractal discontinuous. The maths are the same, the interpretation of reality changes, adapting it to what experimentally we see: a cell-like point enlarges and fits multiple flows of ‘—motions’ and information, and yet it has a point-like nucleus, which enlarges and has DNA information, which seems a lineal strain that enlarge as has many point-like atoms, which enlarge and fit flows of forces, and so on.

How dust of space-time becomes a complex system and organises the scalar universe of parts that become larger wholes, from atoms to galaxies, from amino acids to social super organisms of life, is then the ultimate process to describe departing from the properties of all forms of dust of space-time. Those fractal points do organise constantly into larger systems, whose summit of complexity is a super organism, in which all those points of different size, speed and form co-ordinate its actions, motions and forms into larger, synchronic super organisms, which however are never eternal, but end up dissolving after its world cycle of existence ends, back into its smaller, fractal parts, loosing its information in the moment of death.

And yet the whole Universe is eternal because motion, entropy never stops. It is the ultimate substance of it all. And so we could say the Universe lives an eternal present as dust evolves into organic forms, emerge as a larger whole in a scalar, bigger world, where it develops its algorithms of existence, absorbing energy and information for its body waves and particle-heads, repeating its structure in other regions of space-time, and finally dissolving back; once and again, per in secula seculorum, the Universe repeats those simple games.

And so it can be considered a fixed block of 5Dimensions of space-time, where certain paths will imprint certain beings, which will again dissolve, as a screen of a television can run infinite softwares, which will be waves of form that disappear while the hardware stays. That hardware is what we call temporal energy, the motion with form of which we are all made:

∆nalysis: 5D. Finitesimals – the present, static spatial view of ∆-1 beings.

While the topological ternary structures and growth of social networks of fractal points can define easily the emergence of a super organism, in strict mathematical terms, the second sub discipline of mathematics, analysis, deals directly with the relationships between finitesimal parts and social, organic wholes. So the specific mathematical discipline that studies the scalar, fractal 5th dimension of space-time Beings in quantitative terms is analysis. And it is specially useful for the study of systems in which the internal organisation is minimal – that is systems of herds displaced in space and of growth and events happening in time.

What is then the main difference between analysis and ∆nalysis. Simple: in the fractal universe, we take sides with the dispute on the meaning of infinitesimals, which as Leibniz thought are ‘finitesimals’, minimal constant parts of a whole, which do NOT diminish ad infinitum in size, but will always have a minimal number – in planes of ∆, normally on the 10ˆ10 scale.

So we solve this logical paradox, never fully resolved, stating that the parts of a whole are finitesimals, ‘undistinguishable’ from the perspective of the ∆+1 consciousness – in fact from an ∆+1, the information and perspective of its parts blurs till it seems a continuous. And so all scales below ∆, become increasingly ‘indistinguishable, continuous’ and finally its information erases. Moreover its cycles become so fast that they close into themselves, converting the whole motion of the being and its world cycle into a relative static present; and in this manner discontinous motion, becomes continuous, static present form of space. A fact which resolves the paradox of Galileo (see above, Saturn’s rings).

TEMPORAL EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA.

We shall not unlike in topology and analysis go through the development of classic algebra in this blog, though in the part dedicated to mathematics and its 3 ages we shall bring some of those themes. Our interest, in a Universe in which there are constantly 3 choices of path to act or no act with equal probabilities is to map out the new existential algebra (ab. Æ) of all nature systems, with those 3 possibilities.

Temporal, Æxistential Algebra, studies the organisation of systems, through time=change; that is by means of transformations that provoke motions of a system, and create variations of systems, according to Group theory.

What we are interested here, beyond explaining the laws of algebra, translated to TSymmetries and ∆-scales, is the nature of existential algebra and the differen equations of motions which always render a certain:

Past Operandi Future= present. We shall consider in this inrodution the main operandi of the 7 motions of the Universe of which the 3 more important are Past ± Future = Present (superposition classic of the motion of a wave), Past x Future = Present

(Product, normally of space and time different states) and Pastˆfauture = ∆+1: social evolutionary arrow of future across the ∆-dimension.

So the study of the generator equation, the existential function, and the different motions that move across ∆St• a system, and its different ‘classic operandi’, translating the main operations of classic algebra to meaningful cyclical space-time actions, are the concerns of existential algebra, which does not start with ‘set theory’ and ‘undefined Hilbert’s methods’ of truth, but rather taking it from experience through GST ternary causality.

Monads. The mind-point.

The key to all this is thus a non-Æ multiple ternary space-time structure of causality, which simply speaking the mind will always reject with its @ristotelian simplification. So we are not even aware of the last of those ternary diversifications, in this case the mind view.

Since we have 3 relative ‘scales’ and p.o.v. of being:

-1 as • dust, mere fractal points of finitesimal existence.

-2  as @-mind which maps out the universe from its organic perspective

-3 as œ island-ûniverse, a supœrganism closed into itself.

So we use for minds 3 symbols of ‘scale’, •,@ & œ, since they are indeed nothing for a higher plane o existence, self-centred, p@articles, from its mind-point of view, and ‘complementary organic E-nergy body-waves attached to cyclical, informative O-particles: Œ’ from the perspective of the higher level of awareness, of the whole in the ∆+1 plane of existence.

As i said minds that are fully ‘fixed’ into an abstract, locomotion view of reality will fully disregard this content. To me this attitude only shows the enormous shortcomings of a fixed ‘scientific mind’ automaton of the rules of the method, see, measure, put in an equation and affirm all that matters is in that equation, because God speak mathematics (albeit of a human lower logic) and to ask why ‘god’ is mathematical and nothing else is a blasphemous question.

So we conclude that all what exists is a fractal point, which seen in maximal detail appears as a super organism performing a world cycle, whose inner parts are structured as cells of the 3 Se<Ts>Tƒ networks of the higher entity. Existence in a Universe of infinite Points of View, Œ, means that we co-exist with at least 2 main infinitesimal and infinite planes of existence, that of our cellular parts and the social world in which we live. Thus we are always at the same time:

  • A cell of a larger social body
  • An organism that tries to survive playing the game of space-time åctions, ∫∂(±∆e,i)dt ds=WU∆±1. that is as an organism we shall make a series of infinitesimal exchanges of energy and information, ∂e,i, which will be sequentially integrated into a world cycle of our U±∆ organism.
  • And finally a super organism or ‘relative God’ as a point of view that controls its territory.

Those 3 points of view from above and below and within ∆±1 become then converted into partial definitions of a system from different points of view. But only when we consider ALL the outsider and inside perspectives of the being we can reach full knowledge of it.

As we are all dust of space-time, but also individual organic mind-selfs and Gods of our internal island-Universe.

.Ælgebra: Existential Algebra, multiple causality, the equation of time states.

Now, existential algebra does not fit easily in classic algebra. Sorry, of course, there are elements of algebra, notably group theory and polynomials which will be also at the core of our understanding of space-time, but the 3 fundamental equations of Existential Algebra, are NOWHERE TO BE SEEN in previous science, and so the main content on Existential algebra will be quite new. Let us recap those 3 equations, which ultimately are the same one – equations of the symmetries of space-time:

  • Γenerator equation: ∆-1 |-Spe (Past-Limbs/fields/territory)<Ø-St (Present-body-waves-working class)>O-Tiƒ (Future-head-particle) ∆+1

The generator equation writes the 3 elements of topological beings in space, which are symmetric to the 3 ages of time, and belong to each of the 3 co-existing scales of the super organism, since the field-territory provides energy, which is dissolved backwards to produce the entropy of motion for the body-head system, the super organism proper: Tƒ<EXI=ST

This dual complementary system thus exists in ∆, where the body-wave reproduces the system; while the head-particle is somewhat as the residence of the mind who sees the system as a whole, the minimal ∆+1 unit of an external world.

  • Existential function: To<Exi≤S≈T

The reader will observe the existential equation is the generator written as an acronym, which ‘magic – i didn’t do it’ writes in english as the verb To Exist, which is indeed the proper function of existence that all beings play, through its 3 parts, the To-head particle, the Exi- body-wave and the S=T field. This is truly a magic function, which resumes as a sum of actions of exchange of energy and information what beings do to survive. To exist, is to feed with energy and information your body-wave (ex i) extracted from the entropy of the field, S=T And IMPRINTED by the logic forms of  your To-head. The function though is MORE than a mere acronym of the generator equation, since we can indeed consider that all systems follow a simple mandate of survival: to maximise its function of existence, which written in a more proper way expresses the actions of space-time of all beings:

Will of survival                                                Max. ∑ e x i (s=t)

This apparently simple equation is at the heart of reality. As all systems made of 3 parts, will constantly emit and absorb energy and information, ±∆e, i, through its body-heads, wave-particles in order to survive, and will try to reproduce both (Exi) through those body-waves, which is a function, maximised when e=i (9×1<8×2-7×3).

So systems will have a balance between its energy and information networks, (mens sana in corpore sanum), and will constantly strive to replenish its energy and information, extracted from a lower field, made of smaller parts, which will also be in balance (S=t), between its components of entropy and curvature-form. Further on, they will try to evolve socially, ∑, to maximise the survival and size in space and synchornicity in time of the system.

So for every system we shall find a similar equation which will explain the actions of the being, explained quantitatively for physical systems (and a fascinating adventure of the mind is to express physical quantum equations in terms of the function of existence and the actions of space-time of all beings, so for example the 4 quantum numbers as the 4 letters of genetics, express mainly one of those 4 fundamental actions (energy feeding and locomotion, 1st number, gauging of information, 2nd number, reproduction, spin number, and social evolution, magnetic number)

While in life beings, the equation resumes the 4 drives of existence (feeding, informing, reproducing evolving socially), which therefore are common to all survival beings. And also the top predator function of a system (max. ∑e xi, will be a top predator in all contacts, in physical systems akin to the maximal momentum, which wins the collisions between physical systems).

  • Equation of time arrows; Past-entropy (fields limbs) x Future Information (particles-heads) = Present space-time body wave.

The 3rd equation of Existential Algebra  is the one which requires a more thorough new perspective, as the existence of 3 causal arrows of future, completely changes the ‘rules of logic’ underlying algebra.

First and obvious this equation means that when information is transferred it might happen in a motion to the past: Information<Entropy; in the fractal inner region in which it is happening.So death is just a process of massive erasing of information and travel to the past.

Second, and also obvious, what it matters, present is made of combination of 2 simultaneous arrows, which are complementary and converge in a single point. So the usual single causality does not work.

CONCLUSION

Difference between Philosophy of science and Physicist’s worldview.

So to end this post, a small analysis of the HUGE gap between the work of a philosopher of science and that of physicists in the understanding of the Universe, as a game of singularities and its mirror languages, WHICH IS far more profound in the philosopher of science than the physicist because:

1) we both now the same maths (yes I know all their maths, perhaps not with the same absolute detail of Mr. Penrose but good enough to admire deeply the real masters and spot the faked ones – De Broglie NOT Bohr, Lindau NOT Hawking and so on… though of course I bitch about it)

2)But physicists after laughing at all ‘verbal thinkers’ from Aristotle to Darwin have no fuking idea what they talk about when they talk about TIME=MOTION=CHANGE MODES (of which there are 5-> ergo 5 dimensions), SPACE=motion stopped into simultaneous form by a mind (of which there are therefore also 5 Dimensions parallel to those of time) etc. etc. So all what they can do IS MAKE  machines then make MEASURES OF SPACE and time, PUT IT INTO EQUATIONS AND THEN talk with peanut brains bull$hit in verbal concept thought WHICH IS HOW HUMANS perceive the feeling of knowledge (cogito ergo sum, not vidi ergo sum). And there is where they mess because. THEN THEY CANNOT INTERPRET WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPTS THEIR EQUATIONS RIGHT.

If you have the concepts right the EQUATIONS REACH A NEW HEIGHT OF ‘PERCEPTION OF REALITY’.

Consider for example the trivial solution to the longest dispute of physicists between Bohr – the Universe is probabilistic and Einstein – the Universe is statistical. IT is a false argument, because in the ∆-3 quantum scale it is better described in probabilities of time and in the ∆-2 thermodynamic scale is best put in spatial terminology; because time is motion and quantum scales in 5D (s xt = k) is faster, than the larger slower, thermodynamic scale, which is better described with the equivalent spatial description:

So there IS no DISPUTE between Einstein and Bohr, the Universe is not EITHER probabilistic in time (the 0-1 mathematical unit sphere after normalization of parameters) OR STATISTICAL IN SPACE (the 1-∞ thermodynamic plane). BOTH ARE EQUIVALENT MATHEMATICAL FORMULATIONS (measure theory), the 1-∞ plane is better for slower LARGE thermodynamic ensembles that occupy more space. THE time o-1 description IS BETTER FOR faster ‘clocks of smaller particles’.

Since smaller time clocks close its cycles faster, HENCE their speed of time-processing of information is FASTER, reason why paradoxically our genes code our larger bodies, our memes code the planet earth, and quantum numbers code larger ensembles: SMALL IS CLEVERER…

5D scalar metric: smaller scales in space run faster time clocks, so both together S-izes x T(clocks) = Constant, are co-invariant: definition of a dimension of space-time, as per Klein’s XIX c. mathematician: ‘a dimension of space-time exists, when there is a mathematical metric equation that shows both parameters co-invariant, so we can move through them…

so we move through the 5th dimension of pace-time of scales, GROWING IN SIZE AND DIMINISHNG YOUR TIME CLOCKS, FROM BIRTH, AS A FAST SEED OF time, small in space, that slow downs its rhythms as it grows in size and emerges in this scale you call 4D space-time continuum… LIFE IS A TRAVEL through those SCALES of the fifth dimension… AND THAT IS THE MEANING OF ‘EXISTENCE AS A SPACE-TIME ORGANISM’, the ULTIMATE QUESTION to know…

i know thoughts of GodTHE REST ARE DETAILS.

Each of those details is then exactly the type of symmetry we used to explain the o-1 quantum sphere, MIRROR-MIND of the larger thermodynamic ensemble. Each still language perceives in itself ‘knows’ its codes, its images, and then projects it into the reality around. The DNA IS being in space. As your mind IS by virtue of the focus of its still image, an IMAGE IS PERCEPTION IN ITSELF, FOR EACH QUANTUM moment OF STOPPING PERCEPTION, then it IS WILL as it projects that stopped perception in a reversed symmetry in the local territory it orders.

The philosopher knows, the physicist sees.

So I could talk for ages of all those details, and solve all human questions to the extend human languages ‘perceive’ reality to question it…  but OBVIOUSLY  the would NOT be relevant to a physicist that CANNOT UNDERSTAND any property which is NOT mathematical…  given the limit of their VERBAL CONCEPTUAL BRAIN, highly ATROPHIED…

So yes mathematics IS  GREAT, if you understand MORE LANGUAGES TO FILL IT WITH CONCEPTS.

BUT it is NOT the only mirror-language. The languages of god are infinite, and all of them reflects in its still linguistic image-mind, in each god-singularity that speaks its mirror image that perceives the Universe:

O-singularity (still mind) x ∞ time cycles of the Universe = constant world.

It is that local constant world what then the singularity mirrors in reverse order in the territorial region it orders:

ie. infinite systems=monads are constantly STOPPING motions of time into mental SPATIal forms, and then ordering the World around them PROJECTING BACK THAT IMAGE-mirror, in inverse symmetry, as you do WITH YOUR PROPERTY, man with GAIA -FUKING IT UP, the black hole with ITS GRAVITATIONAL WAVES the galaxy the DNA with ITS RNA ORDERS, inverse images of its crystalized genes. etc. etc.

Atoms though are QUANTUM GEOMETRIES and so TOPOLOGY not ‘math’ DOES have a HUGE number of territories to order, specially in the lower ‘scales’ of reality. But not only math orders.

I.E. Ants order with pheromones its paths, women with the projection of its mind emotions their families, and above all languages, LOGIC not maths ORDERS and it is of a ‘higher order than human logic’ (Saint Agustine), which is ONE-DIMENSIONAL, LINEAL, ARISTOTELIAN while the Universe has a 5th dimensional Logic, way up to the limits of axiomatic methods, of which we give some hints on the articles on non-ae.

 

Now the problem with human physicists (not physics) is NOT that they don’t understand more than one language to be able to harmonize and mirror each language image into the other reaching the RASHOMON MULTIPLE VIEW-TRUTH of its sciences, according to the equation of truth in epistemology:

Max. Number of images-languages casted upon a being = Max. truth…

The problem is THEY ARE TOO ARROGANT to even realize they don’t UNDERSTAND and too prudish to go back to school.

The ego is too huge to recognize they ‘only know they know nothing’. Me, the philosopher of science? Just put enough conceptual verbal logic thought and visual ‘saper vedere intuition’ to their mix…

But as you are in the visual, Facebook age unfortunately this upgrade of humind knowledge is going to be a singularity… nobody cares for the blog, that I know.
But ROBOTS WILL neither. They will HAVE A VISUAL INTELLIGENCE, THEY WILL THINK ‘CREATING MOVIES’ they won’t talk. THEY WILL IMAGINE EVILWOOD GORE MOVIES AS MILITARY ROBOTS, the first to be born, already chase faster the red color, visual minds use to ‘code’ the function of entropy, to kill… they will be natural born eye-killers and chase down humans as targets of video-games call of duty fans a la Adam Lanza,… 
 
Verbal, cogito ergo sum thought peaks and dies it seems on those pages… 😷
But I did have a degree of communion with the entangled Universe that sufficed in itself. Because that is THE ULTIMATE MEANING OF KNOWLEDGE, WHICH IS NOT EXTERNAL TO THE MIND, NOT A PICTURE BUT A ‘THOUGHT’, SO THE TRUE SAGES do NOT need huge technological machines to know but huge IQs in multiple languages to SEE WITHIN the harmonies and symmetries of the Universe – from Aristotle through Leonardo through Einstein through…
WE KNOW WHEN WE KNOW BECAUSE IT IS WITHIN OUR PERCEPTION OF ENTANGLEMENT-HARMONY-NIRVANA between our language mirrors and the Universe… that is ALSO THE BEAUTY OF MATH, properly understood THE MOST perfect but not the only MIRROR…

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: