Home » ‘¡ºMind§:

‘¡ºMind§:

±∞∆•ST

Advertisements

й¹ GODS: LINGUISTIC MEMBRAINS

“God is the seer of time”. Saint Augustine.

‘God is the unmoved center, cause of the motions of its territorial body’ Aristotle

‘Every point is a world in itself Leibniz

There are infinite membrains, operating vital bodywaves of energy with its Dimotions of exist¡ence @ mind Ll§

a mind in its minimal expression is a clock of time, which regulates to its path the dimotions of its territorial body as it tries to survive, playing in an automaton way its game of exxistence, which the self-reflective mind will see from its relative future, as a present, but happens by the will of the body that embodies all the dimotions at once.

As the mind is determined to play the best game of existence, its free will is absurd notion of self-ego trips of the humind, proved ad nauseam false by research of neuronal biology that proves the mind in present time thinks after the body starts its action. So the body is the present, the mind is displaced into the future but does not seem to act but in the future.

However because the mind is in the future it thinks it is the present state with the body and believes it has free will. Further on down the ladder of a discontinuous tail of time, the limbs are in the past, but as they are the past, paradoxically they seem to act earlier than the others, and guide the motions, so locomotions seem to be the deterministic, constructivist term.

What is then into the future? It is hard to tell, because in ¡logic there is not a primary cause, but ternary causes that flux the present each one considering the center of the Universe.

Minds then are the future, informative focus of the whole.

But the mind is not a primary cause, as ternary causes  flux the present; each one considering to be itself by the paradox of the mind, o-infinitesimal mind x ∞ Universe = constant, world, the center of the Universe it equates to its world.

We are monads that hold worlds, mirror perspectives of a mind over the whole, but we are not the whole much more complex and infinite in parameters to the mind.

The mind we might say is a single ray of the infinite horizon, as it shall decode ultimately into a single lineal parametrical language, verbal symbols in human beings that as we know have a lineal syntax as you read in ‘lines’

The mind is thus an infinitesimal ultimately lineal reduction to a time speed of processing information of the whole spatial infinity it portrays in increasingly reduced forms of information till its primary language that seems to be codes of 0101 numbers in virtual minds of atomic nature and words in humans.

The equation of the mind: Non-Euclidean, Monads. 10th & 11th Ðimensions

mind scales

Llet us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.

– The mind, monad or @-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

infinitesimal @-mind x ∞-timespace cycles = Constant World.

The equation of the Linguistic Monad, thus is the origin of the ego paradox, as each of the  ∞ Mind-Worlds that look at the single Universe, create a self-centered perspective and confuse their infinitesimal mind mapping in any language of thought with the whole infinite Universe.

In the graph, above to the left,  our mind is electronic, we feed on light energy and transform it into an informative mapping of the Universe, reduced to what light sees. Thus our space is light space-time, with its 3 Euclidean coordinates, a fact that was first understood NOT by physicists but by impressionist artists, Leonardo, whose motto ‘saper vedere’, guided my inquire as a young artist on reality behind the languages that describe it, and then by the impressionists; and finally by Picasso, who departed from reality, affirming he painted thoughts, so he studied the ‘elements’ of the mind mapping, its entropic lines (cubist age) and its cyclical forms (female portraits).

But Picasso said, I paint thoughts, because he went as Descartes a bit further in his understanding that what we see is an electronic construction of the mind over that visual space, but there should be infinite other monad-mind-languages mapping the Universe and its ‘space-time beings’.

And this is the origin of creationism. This said of course, the geometric nature of spacetime makes of mathematical mind-mirrors the best possible ones, most efficient and hence those who mirror in topology, as atoms probably do, survive better, than those who smell the Universe or talk about it. Still human geometry is also a simplified version of the non-Euclidean pan geometry of universal minds, since it has only changed the 5th postulate of ‘light space-time geometry’, the one that precisely defines the mind as a point through which ∞ parallels of information might cross:

The rules of geometric and biologic engagement of those points to form waves, networks and topological organisms, define the non-æ bio-logic of the organic Universe based in the a(nti)symmetric laws of similarity, parallelism and perpendicularity expressed in 5 ¬Æ postulates that substitute the classic axiomatic method of definition of logic and geometry

In the graph, we see thus, the true meaning of the 5th  Non-E postulate, which should redefine points as object with ‘breath’, which grow in size as we come closer to them, becoming whole ‘worlds’ in themselves, cells, stars, galaxies… That is therefore the proper definition of a real fractal point (1st postulate) and a real mind that bends all that information about the world into its smallish mind. Since the fractal point does have breath, as it includes a volume of energy, entropy and information, carried by a relative number of ‘finitesimal’ parallel waves, but the ‘Aristotelian mind’, reduces it to an Euclidean point. From where it follows that lines are waves of points with breath and planes are topological networks of similar ‘fractal points’, and so we shall define a topological space-time being as a fractal network/plane and once we have upgraded non-euclidean geometry and the ¡logic nature of the organic Universe, r=evolve all sciences of thought, as nobody has done since… Aristotle.

Because it is NOT more data what science needs but an improvement of its logic and mathematical principles regarding the nature of time and space, to be able to upgrade our view of reality, something that has not been fully done since the Greeks… with the exception perhaps of Darwin, and the ill-understood Leibniz.

Instead, what physicists and scientists did was to add to human perception of time with logic words, clocks that reduced our understanding of the causal nature of past present and future time-verbs, and add to the eyes, telescopes and microscopes to look at those scales.

And then because they used machines to see the Universe, decide that the Universe and man were machines, and because those machines used digital numbers to measure decide that the language of the machines they worship were the languages of god.

Since it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational space-time models and apply them to all sciences, since to explain epistemologically reality we do NEED to ad organic and sentient properties ot the fractal Universe.

Infinitesimal mind-mirrors ordering local worlds

To explain the fractal, scalar structure of the Universe, we need to understand minds and seeds as  linguistic mirrors that shrink reality either into an smaller image in space (mind) or a ‘compressed’ duration of time (palingenetic seed). So minds & seeds ‘create’ the fractal diminishing, infinite, reproductive spacetime scales

This is a self-evident.

Since while all systems gauge information, their capacity to order reality is just a mirror process by which languages mirror in ‘still, smaller linguistic images’ the world they perceive and then reflect this mind-order in their territorial ‘energy-body’:

Infinitesimal mind-language x ∞ Universe = constant self-centered world.

As Aristotle realized ‘we are all gods, the unmoved final cause of the motion of the energy around us’. So languages DO order locally preserving in ‘smaller’ scales the larger structure of the universe, converted in this manner in a Game of Fractal Mirrors.

In that sense, the fractal Universe we perceive as ‘it is’ cannot be explained rationally without adding to the acknowledged temporal and spatial properties we ‘expand’ with the concept of space-time ‘dimotions’,  organic properties born of the co-existence of 3 scales of smaller parts that form networks, which become larger wholes… So for example, your nervous system perceives reality as it ‘integrates’ the sensations of all its cells.

But if we want also to understand how those infinite scales of size are created we need to postulate the existence of linguistic mind mirrors that ‘shrink’ reality into its infinitesimal still mapping; either as mental forms – since you indeed do NOT see the Universe but the infinitesimal electronic image created in your mind with light space-time; or as ‘seeds of information’, which we can consider a ‘static, frozen informative mind’ that will replicate a larger whole, replica of its inner information.

Minds are  linguistic mirrors that shrink reality in space. While seeds are mirrors of superorganisms ‘compressed’ in its evolutionary duration of time (palingenetic seed), which implies a continuity of information through eons of discontinuous time generations. So minds & seeds ‘create’ the diminishing, ∞, spacetime scales of reality becoming the inverse arrow of causality to that recognized today by ‘Constructivism’, the theory of reality according to which causality comes only from the smallish physical world to the larger one. It is only when we ad this other causality when we can balance all stiences as absolutely relative and the two directions of the fifth dimension, upwards towards parental wholes and downwards towards smaller parts..

But what is the structure of the Mind? Simple: it is created when a membrane closes a vital energy, and develops a relative self-center that will invaginate that energy with networks of information, shaping reality. The mind in that sense is the sense of the whole brought about by the interaction of the sensorial membrane, which in huminds is our outer perception through the inner mind of us as a skin enclosing our body.

The membrain thus made of a brain and a membrane, form 2 dimensions of the being, the singularity or still mind-brain proper and the sensorial membrane the isolates but also connects the singularity mind with the external world.  They are the dimensions that complete the 9 perceivable, as the 10th and 11th dimensions of the mind, which in this manner encloses the whole with its 10th membrane and focuses it into a ‘temporal-will-moving’ program of existence, the mind proper in its linguistic still mappings and formal intelligence that will paradoxically move the whole through its actions into the flow of time.

The 10th and 11th disomorphic ‘dimensions’ of the Mind – the membrain or outer surface enclosing the vital energy of the open ball, with maximal expansive motion-distance or angular momentum; self-centered in the singularity, whose latitude is purely temporal as it moves the whole in time-duration through its lineal inertia. And within the invaginated networks that control the e-vident being in its paradoxical ∞º exist¡ence.

Membrain-Mind’s 2 Ðisomorphisms:10th & 11th Ðimensions

We have no longer magic mystery for the mind membrain. It is all rather simple when we come to the first principles: the mind is the closed membrain that competes the ‘topological open ball of vital energy’ constraining its domain and establishing its initial and final conditions in time (the singularity brain’s duration) and space (the membrane that encloses it).

We could of course consider a third dimension for the mind – the physiological 3 networks that invaginate the system, but we rather study them as the 3 topological dimensions of space that define the being and reduce the mind to the interaction between the connected ‘singularity’ and the membrane that isolates the system from the external world.

The mind though has in the entangled Universe many perspectives and points of view of analysis departing from its 2 initial Ðisomorphisms, its brain and its membrane. So minds are in formal terms ‘membrains’ – our slightly changed name for the new more precise stientific definition.

The graph shows the mind-brain as a singularity connected by its ‘informative network’ to the sensorial membrane whose apertures communicate with the external world. It is in the interaction of those 2 disomorphic dimensions of the mind, where the true explanations of each species of ‘membrain’ warps up the description of the being. In general terms we can consider that the 10th Disomorphic dimension of the mind, the membrane is the maximal $patial element of the being – in extension/motion; and the singularity its maximal ðemporal event, traveling for the finite duration of the being.

And that a T.œ by definition is born when a membrain is formed, starting its world cycle of evolution, from carbohydrates closed by protein membrains self-centered in RNA-DNA active minds, to galaxies self-centered in black hole minds with a halo of likely strangelets of maximal momentum.

Angular momentum is in that sense the best definition of the 3 elements of the mind, the singularity the radius/network that connects it to the outside membrane; and for that reason when dealing with quantum physics we shall adscribe the brain’s-singularity dimensionality/ parameters to the spin of the particle and its membrane to its angular momentum, reason why we need 2 parameters to measure it, the l and s numbers.

In humans obviously the mind is both our external membrane that we see as ourselves, the central brain that processes our information and lives in time as a memorial tail and the sensorial nervous systems that connects them and invaginate the whole organism.

The mind is an infinitesimal point, Ƽ which observes an infinite Universe of world cycles, ư, mapping with pixel of information a reduced still linguistic image of the whole that it confuses with the Universe itself.

Hence all minds suffer a huge ego paradox thinking they are the center of a Universe they hold in its mind, when they are mere infinitesimals observing the whole.

And they think their mind-language creates the Universe because they only see that Universe though its mind-languages. Those paradoxes of the ego are also extreme in human beings cause of the creationist theories of reality proper both of verbal speakers (old anthropomorphic religions) and modern digital scientists. We thus study in this post a first approach to the equation of the mind, ∞º, focusing in the ego paradox and the god-like nature of those minds, which try to order the Universe around themselves, projecting the images of their mind in their local territory, they deem absolute – the whole. So the first human tribes called themselves ‘man’ and thought their valley was the Universe, with a dome of holed stars… And these days they think the infinite can be described by a simple lineal V=HoD equation because in the beginning it was an infinitesimal point as their minds are, that can fit in a hand:

selfreprodctive

In the graph, the Universe is an infinite tapestry of networks of self-points, none of them more important, but the paradox of the ego makes each point of each network and scalet to be the center of it all. This subjective ego paradox embedded in reality contrasts with the goal of science which is objective and hence advanced in steps towards absolute relativity achieved in this blog.

Of the many definitions of God we shall here consider the best of them, that of Saint Augustine – God is the sum of all exist¡ences and all realities in the past present and future and as such the whole potential flow of all time space events and forms – the Tao of all beings. A second, more used though personal concept of God is that of the maximal informative mind of a system – a local symmetry, part of the Global symmetry of God. Both Gods are represented in human cultures by the western and eastern view of God. We shall consider some elements of both of them, starting with the western God, as the seer of the time-existence of a single being:

God-2-1-1024x600

In the graph, the Absolute God of the Universe IS its mind of maximal information. Is that point conscious or impersonal? We can compare it with human Gods, the point of maximal information of a Human Superorgansim – its ‘self’ in the ∆ scale of individuals, a neuronal group of the brain; its prophets in the ∆+1 scale of societies; an informative master of the wor(l)d; its DNA in the ∆-1 scale of biological cells. All those ‘human gods’, ‘create’ the future of its systems, organism, society or cell with its logic patterns of information.

I. Aristotelian Gods≈Monads

 ‘We are all Gods, the unmoved center of a body of energy’ Aristotle – best ever definition of a mind-singularity, the linguistic mapping of reality in a still mind, which stores its will of existence in any super organism of space-time in which it will reflect locally to ‘order a body-territory’ for whom it will be its local God. So your mind-brain is the God of your body, it orders with its electric messages; the capital of a nation and its king/politicos are the gods of the nation they order with its still, linguistic laws; the DNA linguistic still genes of the cell are the genetic God coded with it 4 numbers; and the black hole still-mind in five dimensions (time goes to zero in Einstein’s equations; in 5 Dimensional equations the black hole mirrors the exact equations of the galaxy in 4 D – Maldacena conjeture), IS the god of the galaxy, and Tao, the laws of time-space organisms and its ‘imorphisms’ are the God of the whole…

trinity religionFinally in Human anthropomorphic religions, God, the language-word that inhabited among us, in the mind of the prophet, is the God of a civilization or nation, in which those ethic verbal laws that encode the Tao of the Entire Universe, lost its mystical explanation and became codes of law.

What is God in the fractal Paradigm, of an organic Universe?

The answer is obvious: The super organism of the cell/species we study, from the lower point of view of a citizen cell. As in a discontinuous Universe, each super organism is a world in itself, a whole, the individual cell will see that whole as all what it is and call it God, or in a more restricted manner call god the point of maximal information of the system, Max. Tiƒ, or mind of God. So humans expanded their concept of God, as they expanded their view of the Universe.

image024

ptolemy

In the graph, humans slowly departed from their subjective ego-trips of  the mythic age of Abrahamic religions, in which the tribe first and then mankind was the centre of the Universe, to a scientific world, and within it again, moved away from the Earth as its centre (Ptolemy), in 3 steps. So first they abandoned the ‘who’ of a personal god, into the ‘what’ of a centered earth, a sun, as its centre (Copernicus) and finally the galactic light space-time at its centre (Einstein’s relativity). It is now the time to give the final step into Absolute relativity considering the Fractal paradigm and its 5th dimension, which further stretches to all Universal Planes the understanding of the laws of science, without primacy of any of such scales.

The Superorganism, the game of creation and extinction of super organisms, the world cycle of super organisms, the mind of the super organism, from the perspective of the cell-citizen of the biological or sociological super-organism, the physical, biological or social system is included within. For the absolute relative fractal Universe, two functions are obviously the functions of God:

The Fractal Genrator of super organisms and its ternary symmetries, which describe the word cycle of the super organism:

Sp <ST>Tƒ

and its Tiƒ, function of maximal information or brain that directs from a higher plane of existence, ∆+1, the co-existing cycles of space-time of its smaller atoms/cells/citizens (physical, biological and social super organisms) having an absolute control of its fields of energy, information and reproduction, from the perspective of its neuron cells.

Human anthropomorphism in science peaked in the german, idealist school of Hilbert when mathematics not only remained ‘Galileo’s language of god’ but became invented by the human brain, who became ‘God’. One of the biggest limits of human knowledge is precisely the null understanding of the relationships between languages and reality, and how languages evolve as everything else from a first ‘epic’ age of maximal simplicity when they seem magic truths – so writing first conveyed the feeling it was absolute truth and the pharaoh said it has been written.

Mirrors were considered magic holding the soul of the observer, because they were so ‘exact’, and mathematics a very recent language still holds this magic, mirror image. Only the true connoisseurs know of its imperfections, describing, only a part of all the properties of the being. Yet what makes of mathematical physics such ‘naive religion’, is the denial that there is anything worth to know outside the ‘reduced’ image of the mirror.

O-points: minds and its languages of information≈Perception.  Eyes of time: Monad. The still mind: The logic explanation of the Galilean paradox. 

Now this much wider vision of time and the organic Universe has been always lingering in the work of the great masters of Philosophy of Science, from Aristotle, with his ‘Organon’ – first scientific theory of unification on organic terms – to Hegel, the last serious formulation of the Spatial entropy x Temporal information=Space-time arrows Fractal Generator (thesis-antithesis=Synthesis) .

It is indeed remarkable that of the 4 colossi who founded modern science, the 2 ‘pure physicists’, Galileo and Newton did not understand this obvious truth. While the 2 equal figures, which had however a more mathematical and philosophical background, Descartes and Leibniz, did grasped at once this ultimate fact of the Universe.

So Descartes, contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

O x ∞ = ∆±1: The equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in a single Universe.

Descartes though was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind:mm

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of ∞ mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Now in the map we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries. This mind on top is an Euclidean mind because it uses the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light:

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.45.10

In the graph the Euclidean light space-time the human mind sees. In posts on i-logic geometry we develop a pangeometry of all possible non-Euclidean minds of the Universe. We conclude that each mind is a monad, a fractal point crossed by an enormous numbers of rays of information, which create a specific mind, mirror of the Universe, with less volume of information and more stillness to fit in the point. Ours, is an electronic mind, as electrons are fractals whose ‘cells’ are dense photons.

So the eye-electrons feed on light and the mind uses those informative knots, to create an electronic mind similar to that of the digital camera, also electronic – REASON WHY WE CAN SEE A TV, WHICH IS LIKE SEEING INSIDE OUT, a mind of a future robotic machines – now becoming 3Dimensional (Virreal minds).

Of course, the relativity of minds frightens scientists.  It is far easier to construct a simpler model apt for measures with a single mechanical time-clock and a single Cartesian graph of space, self-centered in the human ‘light space-time’ (we see only light, as space-time, with its 3 perpendicular Euclidean dimensions of magnetic width, tall electricity and long c-speed, as Kant told us, impressionists understood and Einstein noticed when describing the ‘fractal’, larger scale of gravitational invisible space-time with non-lineal equations and non-Euclidean geometry).

So in essence, because our brain reduces enormously to fit an image of the Universe the information we have of the Universe, eliminating all other scales and its planes of space-time (seen though with telescopes and microscopes), we reduce the 5 dimensions of the Universe, including the scalar dimension of sizes and time clocks of different speed, first to 4 dimensions in a single scale, and then 2 bidimensional sheets of information, as the screen/page you read.

So we shall first define those o-points mathematically, as minds, or fractal, non-Euclidean points, the fundamental unit of the organic Universe, which are crossed by a relative infinite number of parallel forces, which are the bits of information used by each of them to create a mapping, linguistic mirror of the Universe.

‘Infinitesimal self-centered O-Point x ∞ cycles of space-time’ = 0 x ∞ = C-onstant Linguistic Mind mapping of the Universe’.

So each o-point eliminates information from the ∞ beings in existence to reduce its information to an infinitesimal. In the human case, we reduce the 4 dimensions of our plane of existence to 2 dimensions for each eye, eliminating depth and motion to fit all that information in the mind.

So we convert time cycles into forms and they seem solid to us, and we convert vacuum space with entropic motions into lineal distances.

This is the most important property of those points of view – the capacity they have to reduce the Universe into a mind image, of linguistic nature, which explains the duality between ‘motion perception and form’, as all is motion, either cyclical time motion or space-kinetic energy motions but the mind reduces it to a still image, as Heraclitus or Buddha first realized, considering that the stillness of the Universe is a Maya of the senses.

The equation of the mind is also of enormous importance for all psychological aspects of science and behavior, as it is the origin of the ‘Ego Paradox’, which in human beings reach an astounding infinity (:

‘Every point of view believers to be the centre of the Universe, because it sees it from its relative point of view, selecting only the information that increases its chances of survival’.

In the opening montage of cyclical systems of space time, we can see how all what exists is a fractal system made of vital space, with kinetic motions, encoded and informed by accelerated clocks of time, self-centered in a relative point of view or frame of reference that holds together the system. In the graph we can indeed see a small sample of fractal systems, in which a central first point of view, once it is born, reproduces in waves of clone forms, which then reorganize into an static form with a classic order – a fractal which seen from THE SELF-centered perspective is a form of consciousness growing and dying as it performs a world cycle of existence.

The paradox of the self can be explained in many ways, but essentially means that as systems perceive themselves in the centre, and the Andromeda galaxy is smaller than a hair of your nose, as all systems absorb only a limited information, ‘perceiving’ NOT the entire Universe but its close world, every system is ruled by selfish behavior, and every human think to be the only intelligent being, ‘entitled’ and superior to the rest of creation, which he is not.

The ego is as Buddha and Descartes understood a Maya of the senses

Thus now we can respond why we perceive reality both as motion and stillness. The answer is in the ternary structure of all beings, self-centered by a mental point of view.

We are all self-centered, fractal organisms of vital space, tracing world cycles.

So now we must deal with the consequences for knowledge of the ego paradox, which is mainly our belief that only human minds are intelligent and so its languages.

And so we must fully grasp the fact that we humans are not that important in the fractal Universe, but just a ‘fractal organism’ in one of its many relative scales, and our ‘intelligence’, that is, the languages of information we use to perceive the Universe, mainly logic words to perceive time, mathematical geometry to perceive space, are also not ‘special’, and they do not create the Universe or are the ‘languages of god’ as religious people and pythagorean physicists believe.

Since the main problem to objectively grasp, the  nature of reality as a fractal, organic system is that subconscious bias of all humans of all ages and all disciplines of reason or belief, against Nature, due to our ego-trips that make us happy only when we are the centre of the Universe as individuals and species.

Fractal Minds: ∞ worlds

Thus we must observe the Universe to prove mathematical statements and reduce mathematics as we do with all experimental sciences to those equations, which ‘are real’.

T.Πdoes show by regressing a step back in the scaffolding of mathematics and defining those terms, as the Postulates of i-logic geometry, based in the structure of cyclical time, fractal space and the 5th dimension where:

1) A fractal point grows in size when we come closer to it, so it has parts, its O-mind and its E-field flows of energy or limbs. Hence we define it as Œ, an existential point.

What they perceive will depend on the Lobachevski/Gauss Constant of Time-Radius/Space-length, r2/L2 (Tƒ/Sp parameter), which defines its geometric view as hyperbolic (for smaller planes), Euclidean (for the human H/c2 plane of informative spin time cycles and light space-rods).

Let us elaborate a bit more on this essential component of the Human World – NOT the only worldview on space-time there is.

Now in the post on astronomy we explain ‘why’, light is a c-constant rod of space, and hence c² the factor of Lobachevski/Gauss definition of the form of the geometry. It follows that because H-Planck, the constant of spin or minimal quanta of information of the human Universe is exceedingly small, and the ‘degree’ of Euclidean nature of a world depends on r²/L², in this case h/c² to be infinitely small so the ‘radius’ of a circle and the ‘angle of perception’ of a triangle becomes pi, and 180/3, we humans see an Euclidean light space-time.

But a bigger radius of perception (smelling minds with atomic pixels, i.e. insects) will be hyperbolic; or a larger rod of measure (action at distance in gravitation), will be elliptic (quark/black hole? perception).

Now of course, a ‘science’ as the human ego-centered science, which is fully unaware of its ego-centered paradox, and confuses the world of its mind with the entire Universe will ignore organic and perceptive explanations of reality, but they are THE ONLY ones that explain the whys of reality.

God and the paradox of the ego.

The first truth about God in personal terms, is the mind paradox. We believe to be Gods self-centered in the Universe because we perceive the mind mapping of that Universe as our world and as we dominate our mind mapping, the ego behind the world of our perception becomes God.

the mind is a singularity or infinitesimal 0-point, the relative frame of reference that maps the ∞ cycles of SPACE-ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

This we formalize with the equation of the mind:

0-linguistic mind x ∞ space-time cycles of the Universe = Constant World mapping of reality, with the mind at its centre.

In mathematical terms 0 x ∞ = Constant; that is the infinite information of the Universe, multiplied by the relative infinitesimal volume of our mind gives us a constant mapping, where we extract all the properties that are not interesting to us and our self-centred view.

So the first to go are the MOTIONS of other entities, which is what makes them feel alive. Indeed, Science started when Galileo realized the mind stopped the motion of the earth, but the Earth MOVES: e pur si muove he said and Galilean Relativity latter expanded by Einstein gave birth to physics.

Next, of course, they eliminate ALL THE OTHER egos, and sentient points of view, so only we are intelligent. And animals perhaps and only recently. But our atoms are NOT different, so the sentient pan psychic universe likely IS already thinking in any atom, as all reproduce particles, gauge information, evolve socially with magnetic fields. But we JUST reduce minds to ours.

And this is the origin of the paradox of the ego, as from a perspective which is blind to all the motions and vital perception of other beings, as from our perspective, NOTHING THINKS AND from our perspective we see our own nose bigger than Andromeda. So reality becomes deformed, inert, and the ego becomes the center of the Universe, as always happened with humans who thought first the earth in its center, then chosen of god, the creator, who spoke our language, and finally debased all living entities reducing them ‘to spatial forms’ in the still mapping of the mind, which stops all motions to fit a reduced image of reality.

So we express verbally the ego paradox, as the ‘ego believes its still mind mapping IS all the information of the Universe, when it is only an infinitesimal part of it, self-centered in the self’.

Instead of monads, we use here a simple symbol for Minds, @ taken from modern huminds, increasingly reconverted into digital avatars (:, ):, O:, for the Generator of time arrows, for the topologic combination of lines and cycles, which form a spatial ternary symmetry: |x 0=Ø, and for the ∆-infinite scales of its ‘plenum’ body of space, where fractal parts of it become super organisms, gods of existence. Many variations on the same theme, specially on the central ‘vowel’ can be used, º•Œø∞, as a mind, as an infinitesimal infinite as a super organism as a topology as an infinite dries of scales.

We  highlight three components of all realities: Γ, the three ARROWS/ages of time that generate it ,Φ the three topologies of space across the three scales ∆, of its super organism.

it is god then just the program of creation of super organisms?  And as such always a ratio a balance, a domain within the limits of ∆±i of the domain?

I think so. Thus in this manner ΓœΔ will bring the three elements, time generation, organic topology, scalar, fractal form.

As we are all super organisms made to the image and likeness of god.

We all have Γime Φ-Space & ∆-scalar dimensions We are all gods, we are all super organisms. The existence thus of a Universal particle, or god’s particle, the suer organism, Œ=ΓΦΔ thus closes the third line between the mind and the whole, the first and final isomorphism that describe all beings as both dºst of space-time and a Universal God, dust=dºst.

We shall close this third line on ‘the different functions of exi≈st¡ence§’ of the Universe with the study of the concept of God, as the whole of all wholeness –  Logos≈Mind of the Universal body, in a platonic sense, as the absolute cano of the cave, of which all its fractal parts are  made to its image and likeness – the point of absolute future, of the 5th dimension, of two imaginary time parts, singularity point of no reference, that does not exist ever in present, asymptotic to it:

Max. i

When we say that pure form does not exist, neither pure energy is because the game is never perfect except in the whole that never dies block of 5Dimensions where all the potential games are written.

God both in the Universe at large and the Human Wor(l)d, our Space-Time domain of perception is the pure form of immortal logic time – the world cycle of all world cycles, which never ends as it repeats itself in simultaneity non-locality, at every scale, composed of:

G, Γ, Gamma, the Generator equation that defines its actions

0, •, its fractal 0-point, black hole Mind, Aristotelian still point of maximal density of information≈attraction of the Universe,

D, ∆, Delta its infinite scales.

Form in Space, Mind in time, Future in its infinite scales and hence in its distances – and yet purely as Plato envisioned a canon never to be reached except in the whole infinity itself.

I. THE I-LOGIC DEFINITION OF G•D

So such are the concepts of a personal God, or brain-mind with absolute control of the system that apply to a personal view of God and extrapolated to the Universe, gives the Black Hole, or gravitational brain of information as the God of the system, whose internal ‘chemical mind’ (Maldacena’s equations which show a black hole to have a 5D ‘homunculus’ representation of the 4D electromagnetic galaxy) controls the body of stars of its galactic plane, as the brain controls your cells.

But there is an impersonal Taoist concept of God as the game of existence and creation with the rules expressed in ¬Æ logic terms in this blog. For eastern religions, Ch’ang, God is the game of creation of yin and yang – the isomorphic laws of space-time that all systems obey, including the ‘God-brains’ of any scale of Organisms of the Universe.

And this God can be accessed by any part of the Universe made to its image and likeness, making you communicate and dissolve with the whole in a mystique experience I have lived now alone in this planet for 30 years and counting…

As we have studied in depth this impersonal god all over this web, we shall now concentrate a bit more in the personal God in the Human social scale of super organisms, which is the commonest concept of verbal god, humans better understand.

Personal God – Max. Tiƒ.

Perhaps the closest description of God is that of the mind of a territory of order, by a future fractal point that moves the territory in synchronous motions around its self.

For each discontinuous whole, god is it point of maximal information, or self with the will to order the super organism in which the point of knowledge is inscribed. It follows that god has more information than the point of knowledge, and as such there are degrees of god, regarding how high in the size of the god, we are talking on the scale of super organisms, from where we deduce that god is the logic mind of the Universe – in formal terms, the fractal generator:

Impersonal god = ∆±∞ ($t<∑e∏i>ð§)

which FOR THE SCALES OF DECAMETRIC infinity we perceive as human beings, is the scale of atoms-galaxies, which are the limits we perceive and the game of existence of its super organisms. In other words, the future is created by the Tiƒœ point of maximal information that is in the Universe, the relative quark-black holes of each atomic-galactic system. But humans do not use the word ‘god’ in that sense, so we must explore what ‘god’ as a human semantic word means in our scale.

God in its commonest verbal expression means the most intelligent, informative point of the Universe. Yet as the Universe is a fractal of infinite self-similar TSymmetries of space-time, God can be defined by a simple equation, as the relative point of future of a super organism or whole of wholes, common set of all sets of superorganisms of fractal points in a 5Dimensional Universe:

Personal God= Max. ð§

*****

SUMMARY.

I. Personal, Aristotelian Gods

II. Impersonal, ® God.

III. Human Gods: western and eastern religions.

*******

I. PERSONAL GOD. FRACTAL POINTS. FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE OF INFORMATION. MAX. §ð

ARISTOTELIAN GODS.

“God is the unmoved (perceptive) center of a body of energy, moving around it”. “We are all Gods (of our super organisms” Aristotle

Fractal points: the fundamental particle

 

In all systems planes are made with cellular points, Riemannian spheres with volume that form lines, which are waves between points that exchange ‘—motions’ and information and planes, which are organs of self-similar points that process ‘—motions’ or information in parallel networks. Thus the 5 Postulates of Non-Sp Geometry vitalize the Universe as a series of networks of ‘—motions’ and information of self-similar cellular points. Since the line and the plane acquire volume and become self-similar to the commonest forms of the Universe, the wave and the network of points with a 3-D volume.

This simple fact explains one of the most important discoveries of modern physics, the Holographic principle, according to which information might be bidimensional, as in the screen of a computer or the page of a book. Now bidimensionality no longer becomes ‘magic’ since the 3rd dimension is the relative size of the ‘fractal point-particle’. Thus bidimensional sheets of information do have a minimal 3rd Dimension; the inner content of the point, which in a relative universe of infinite sizes seems to us a particle-point without volume, as we don’t see either the volume of a sheet of paper or a pixel.

All in the Universe are thus complementary systems made of networks. Now this might sound absurd to the anthropomorphic reader that thinks humans are different from the rest of points of the Universe, but it is a fact that those points obey in their actions and communicative flows within a network the same isomorphisms:

humans and electrons behave the same when they move through slits or in herds, the geometries of social groups are also the same and the ultimate purpose of those points, to feed on ‘—motions’ and information, whatever kind, is also the same in all networks of the Universe. And so that group of isomorphisms of networks becomes a primary why for all beings of the Universe.

A fact the leads us to the final element needed to understand the why of the Universe: ‘non-Euclidean points’ organize networks that become points of a higher scale, which reproduce and organize new networks; and so the Universe keep growing in fractal scales, from particles that organize networks and become atoms that organize networks and become molecules that organize networks and become cells, that become organisms, that become planetary societies and planets and stars form gravitational networks that become galaxies, organized by dark matter into Universal networks.

Because all entities have motion reproduction is merely the repetition of a motion with form. Because each entity has 4 time arrows, all of them trace multiple trajectories in search of those arrows, hence they realize multiple time cycles.

For example, a human feeds on ‘—motions’ and information with body and head, reproduces through multiple social cycles and evolves into societies. Our actions are more complex but essentially the same of those of any particle.

The Œ-points: monads that order the Sentient Universe.

This first example of the complexity of the Universe, which many scientists, mostly physicists, have shunned off, obscuring a deeper knowledge of reality, hopefully prepares you to persevere in the understanding of the complex ambivalence of the Universe, simplified by the human mind, whose equation in the metric of the 5th dimension – one of the infinite varieties of Tƒ x Sp = ∆-mind – we can now explain:

O (infinitesimal Œ-point or mind) x ∞ (Universe perceived) = Œ (constant mapping of reality)

What a mind does is rather simple. The Universe out there has infinite time cycles that carry the in/form/ation of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cyclical motions. This is an ∞, which we cannot store inside us.

So we simplify all those motions into ‘forms’ perceived as extensions of space, Sp.

On the other hand the mind is a Tƒ, spherical system, with 2 different spheres: an external membrane with sensorial detectors, which ‘shrinks’ into a relative smaller point, the eye and then the brain, which transforms Sp, the infinite cycles made into spatial forms, and keeps shrinking them to an infinitesimal mapping of reality, a still image, very much as the way a camera reduces reality to a virtual shallow image in 2 dimensions.

And this can be done because of a property of spherical forms, called the Poincare Conjecture: you can  shrink  a topological sphere (any closed membrane, a skin, a planetary surface, is a sphere), as much as you want without deforming its information.  So we find infinite minds in the Universe, ‘monads’ in Leibniz’s terms, which as he said ‘are points, which store a world in it selves’.

So we could also define the Universe as an infinity of ‘world’, fractal minds perceiving reality from those Œ points. What all those fractal minds do? Time cycles? Why. Because they keep perceiving and gauging information through them, and they keep absorbing ‘energy’ to move, and they keep reproducing their time cycles in parallel forms of space-time, and they keep evolving with other points into larger systems of points, topological networks, which have organic nature.

The Universe can be perfectly understood when the human mind and its subjective vision of reality from the perspective of its limited ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Euclidean’, logic, (temporal and visual, spatial perception of the human mind) is considered only one of the infinite points of view, performed by particles and heads that gauge information, move ‘—motions’ and constantly create the events of the universe. Each of those particles and heads create its own perspective and mind view, or mapping of the Universe to which they act-react accordingly.

The 3 geometries of points of views in the symmetry of the 5th dimension.

How the mind vitalises the i-logic geometry of perception of flows of energy and information, with inverse expansions in perpendicular space to that of its frequency, simply, by transferring vitalling transformations of topological views, and hence beating in an orderly manner, repeating certain moves of the function of existence, and its simplex, logic games.

So when we do a move in logic mental space in vital mathematics, and it is allowed it means the topological beings which are made of those frames of reference – its simplified mind-mapping mirrors, it is happening in reality. We have extracted information to make a mind view of it, by just most often leaving in the mind a calculus of variations of maximals and stop and go points, but the result is this: the organism has 3 topologies, 3 points of view that frame referentially those 3 topologies and 3 states of existence whose entropic, informative and reproductive functions are maximised by those topological organs:

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 20.44.22Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 20.49.31

The universe is commanded by mirror symmetries of minds of space-time, we can approximately represent with cartesian coordinates, in hyperbolic cylindral or polar form

The singularity mirror or mind plays a mental mirror in the control of the game of existence. So to know what the mirror plays is to know the game.

In the graph, the world of human perception was in the work ‘the World’ of Descartes not the perception of the entire Universe, but htat of the Euclidean human mind, which in Absoute Geometry, defines its linearity according to the factor that measures the relative ratio between the ‘cyclical eye radius’ of the informative observer and the lineal ‘space distance’ it measures: Tƒ/Sp ≈ r2/k2 ≈ h/c2 ≈ 0 for the human lineal Euclidean Universe, a expression that we will latter clarify in depth when studying the geometry of the 5th dimension.

The Universe thus has different worldviews, with different geometries, according to the size or length rods we use to perceive it with in human beings are the very large rods of ultra-fast light speed, and the size of the ‘quanta’ of information or cyclical form of the observer, which in the human case is extremely small, given the fact that we are electronic eyes, which perceive H-Planck quanta (spins) as our unit of information.

However there are different other worlds of relative sizes of information and length, as we move down or up in the scales of beings of the 5th dimension. All of them can be defined as either elliptic in its perception (larger beings) or hyperbolic (smaller beings), since as we move up and down, the Tƒ/Sp changes, growing for smaller hyperbolic beings and diminishing for elliptic larger beings, departing from our single Parallel Eucidean world.

Screen Shot 2016-04-11 at 19.32.01

The most fascinating of the 3 varieties of bidimensional space times is the sphere, which can shrink in size without limit (Poincare conjecture). Thus all systems have external sensorial membranes that transfer information to a central zero point, defining a general equation for all minds:

0-point=mind x ∞ World = Constant mapping of the Universe.

Thus the 5th dimension, requires both a better understanding of Non Euclidean geometry and the holographic principle of the bidimensional cosmos.

I called this Non-E geometry of 2-manifolds, i-geometry, the next letter, so we shall use it from here on. It became evident that the true advance of our comprehension of space and time was dual: on one side to return to the concept of infinite cyclic times, measure by frequency (the speed of the cycles), which is the inverse equation to lineal duration (the length of all those cycles put together): ƒ: Tƒ=1/duration=1/T.

The creation of dimensional membranes, in layers, in which motion and form are the same sides of the same lineal space concept, |-s, give us a growing universe of increasing scales and dimensions.

Now it must be stressed to give enough mathematical rigor and qualitative accuracy to this blog that information is similar to Temporal Form, as it is carried by time clocks.

Further on information is proportional to the frequency of those time clocks in its volume. And the message of the information is carried in the form of the waves or fixed form we perceive. But temporal form is NOT the same mathematical concept that what Shannon and other ‘humans’  defined as information. Since for humans information is in-form-ation, form-in-action, that is,  form which is communicated and perceived by a human receptor, and so it is carried normally by waves, that add a lineal component of spatial speed, or motion to the pure temporal form of the clocks of time.

The fundamental particle of the Universe is not a physical form but a logic particle: a knot of time arrows, which in any scale of reality, from physical particles (quantum knots of ‘—motions’ and information) to biology (knots=networks that absorb ‘—motions’, information and reproduce and evolve into bigger knots) act under a single mandate: to maximize those time arrows, a fact that we formalize with an equation, the function of Existence: Max. ∑ST; which is the fundamental function of both, logic and mathematical languages.

In the graphS, all such points of view, will define a system of relative perpendicular coordinates, through which it will enact its time arrows, departing from a central knot of information.

 

How language interferes with reality. The Universal Grammar of all languages.

In Newton’s model there are ‘beings’, whose substance is not considered but reduced to Euclidean ‘points with no volume’  that exist in a background abstract frame of reference, mimetic of the Cartesian graphs Newton used to do its calculus (as if God had drawn a mathematical graph in the ‘background of reality’) independent of those beings. Thus this model, which merely ‘translates’ the linguistic tool of the mind – the Cartesian mathematical graph, and affirms IS reality, is called ‘background independent’ space-time. Yet as there is NO experience of that background (there is no absolute vacuum, vacuum is always ‘something’ that ‘fills’ – ultimately light radiation, or ‘background radiation’, so ultimately space still IS light space), this concept seems to be a basic ERROR of logic thought, expressed by Kant – to confuse REALITY with LANGUAGE.

So in the same manner religions say that the language of time humans use to describe reality with ‘verbs’ is GOD, the reality itself, scientists, specially physicists say that the language we humans use to express reality, mathematics is REALITY itself. This ‘simple’, tautological way to define everything goes in science from Newton’s absolute space-time to quantum interpretations of particles as probabilities.

But it IS wrong – a human linguistic ego-trip, similar to that of Abrahamic religions, where ‘The word thy God became man and inhabited among us’ (Saint John’s 1.1.).  And it is also a simple way to give up in the explanation of reality. Reading Newton one notice immediately that because he couldn’t explain what caused gravitation, he came to the conclusion that ‘gravitation’ was a mathematical background space-time. Point. So goes for the quantum masters who could not explain why particles were waves and particles at the same time, and why they could not control them (uncertainty of measure, different behavior in experiments, etc.). So they decided particles and waves were the mathematical tool they used to express them (probabilities).

‘Each point is a world in itself.’ Monadology, Leibniz, the master of relational space-time.

‘God is the unmovable one, the primary cause which moves all the energy of its surrounding vital space’.

‘We are all Gods. And there are infinite of them.’ Aristotle, Metaphysics. The master of verbal thought.

Knots of Time cycles: the fundamental particle.

Once we have studied the minimal units of the Universe, the action of space-time, we pass now into the second architectonical level of reality, that of knots of time cycles, existential points, œ.

Systems are knots of time cycles of exchanges of energy and information with its space and time parts, Œ, which allow them to survive in the Universe.

Thus the first ‘stable structure of reality’, is a knot of time cycle which swiftly goes webbing around the paths of its exchanges of energy and information, ∆±SxT, actions, its survival strategies, trying to maximize its existence, Max. ST, in a state of perpetual balance, Sp=Tƒ…

This dance of being and not being is performed by each Œ, knot-function of existence, defined both as an infinitesimal point from its upper perspective and an absolute whole from its lower plane, since all knots of times space cycles web their existences through several of such plane.

The Universe of communicative Monads.

We thus define in this post the logic postulates of non AE (non-Aristotelian, Euclidean geometry), and its Πfunctions of existence departing from the first postulate of mathematics:

A point is a system of energy and information, perceived as an infinitesimal from a higher plane of existence.

In the beginning there was an observer, a focus point that let itself cross by infinite parallels and perceived a mapping of the Universe.

The infinitesimal point, O, saw the infinite Universe, ∞, and created a constant mapping of it, 0 x ∞ = Constant, in the stillness of the mind.

The point, the Observer the measure is the first action that starts any activity in reality. Prior to motion towards a field of energy or information that interest us or away from it, the point must perceive it. And for that to be possible, the point must have parts, an informative mind –like capacity to gauge information, and rotational motion to change the angle of view.

The point thus have to have angular momentum, the minimal unit observable in the Universe, the h action, a point of view a momentum moving and a radius of distance.

The fundamental Unit of the fractal universe thus is also a point that makes up an absolute space-time, but such points unlike Euclidean classic points of mathematics are fractal non-Euclidean points, which have breath, hence are cycles, the minimal unit of the Universe a time cycle, seen in statics as a cyclical point, dynamically as an attractive point-particle in a static position or a particle with momentum, neutral to a background universe.

Reality is made of symmetries of the 3 motions of time and its infinitesimal, step by step view as spatial forms. This interaction carries to all spheres of reality expressing itself as many different dualities.

We thus can obtain always a still spatial vision or dimensional vision and a dynamic, motion vision of temporal vision and all mathematical equations in geometry of points can be perceived as motion equations, of dynamic differential equations.

We are talking thus of temporal algebra and spatial geometry, of Æ and Œ, as the 2 branches of the i-logic geometry of fractal points that constructs the still spatial forms and membranes we perceive as static presents, and how they web with the entropic, vibratory and vortex motions of the 3 dimensions of time.

We call a knot of such space-time cyclical actions an Πfunction of existence. It is perceived as a fractal point which rows in size as we come closer to it, till we observe its two parts, the vortex of cyclical time, 0 and the flows of lineal entropy, Sp, which come out of its present, most evident body-wave part with its combined energy and information parts.

This Function of Existence will be seen in time as a series of sequential motions, physical momentums in which the Πparticle becomes the active magnitude that exchanges energy and information with the outer, larger world.

Its description as it transits and leaves a memorial reflection of its motions in the form of space distances, conforms the description of the existence of any being, which goes into a sequential order of absorption and emissions of energy (feeding and moving) and information (perceiving and reproducing), through which it creates more stable sequential dual action-reaction fields of density with other similar cloned Œ which will become networks and parts of synchronic super organisms. In this manner forms evolve into social wholes and create in this process the 5th dimension or arrow of ‘long time’, in which parts are relative pasts of future forms, which from the larger pov command their existence.

Infinite of such points exchanges energy and information in infinite scales is the departing point of any scale of realty to understand how it builds above and below itself O±∆ superorganisms.

 The equation of the mind and the 5th postulate of Non-Euclidean geometry.

A hyperbola is perceived as a cycle from the 0point in the center of reference. that is how we are. We are a Œ point but perceive a hyperbola of the Universe. We are nothing and we perceive it all – the entire curve of the hyperbola has 2 focus, but the point that matters is the Œ point.

In the beginning there was an observer, a focus point that let itself cross by infinite parallels and perceived a mapping of the Universe.

This original point might be considered infinite or infinitesimal, God or microbe, the unmoved one, of the eternally moving. But there was no other inertial frame of reference but the one he perceived.

And it was of course, a polar one, the perfect form, the 2-sphere.

Did he started the Universe by the mere fact of co-existing with it? Was he looking at its inside forms? We do not know this metaphysical questions but we can describe bio-topo-logically the first point in existence.

The infinitesimal point, O, saw the infinite Universe, ∞, and created a constant mapping of it, 0 x ∞ = Constant, in the stillness of the mind.

The point, the Observer the measure is the first action that starts any activity in reality. Prior to motion towards a field of energy or information that interest us or away from it, the point must perceive it. And for that to be possible, the point must have parts, an informative mind –like capacity to gauge information, and rotational motion to change the angle of view.

The point thus have to have angular momentum, the minimal unit observable in the Universe, the h action, a point of view a momentum moving and a radius of distance.

The fundamental Unit of the fractal universe thus is also a point that makes up an absolute space-time, but such points unlike Euclidean classic points of mathematics are fractal non-Euclidean points, which have breath, hence are cycles, the minimal unit of the Universe a time cycle, seen in statics as a cyclical point, dynamically as an attractive point-particle in a static position or a particle with momentum, neutral to a background universe.

Infinite of such points exchanges energy and information in infinite scales is the departing point of any scale of realty to understand how it builds above and below itself O±∆ superorganisms.

But the infinitesimal point to be noticed and exist must at least ‘think’, observe, perceive with a certain angle a part of reality converted into mind mapping.

And this can be measured with the simplest, smallest quanta, the angular momentum of a system, the h-derivative increase, the ∆minimal action of perception.

ƕ: angular momentum = h-derivate.

Objective vs. subjective perception

If the fundamental differentiating, ‘external’ property of species in the Universe are the Metrics of the 5th dimension (∆=Sp x Tƒ), which makes them belong to different inverse scales of size in space and energy volume (Sp) vs. speed of temporal information), the essential equalitarian feature is the co-invariance of that product, which gives them the same value when considered, ‘internally’ from the inner point of view of the system,

Since from the inner ‘measure’ of time, the smaller, faster clocks of a diminutive being, process the same amount of information in its life span than the larger being. So an insect which lives a maximal of 7 years (queen ants, elephant cockroaches), since it processes information 10 times faster than we do – reason why we don’t catch a fly – it actually lives as much as we do, 7 x10=70 years.

This is the wisdom of the 5th dimension: all selves feel the center of the Universe they measure from their Non-Euclidean fractal point of view, which has from ‘its’ perspective as much information as the entire Universe do.

The mind self-equation:

O(infinitesimal point of view) x ∞ (infinite, perceived Universe) = C∆ (constant mapping of the whole)

nicely puts it in perspective.

Topology explains it: the sphere is the only topology that can shrink without limit of tearing, allowing the reduction of the infinite into the infinitesimal (Poincare conjecture).

The 5th postulate of non-Sp geometry also defines it.

Let us then start with the usual methodology of ‘building dimensional blocks’ of ST theory, by considering the Spatial location of Minds, as the center of maximal communication of a system.

 

A-4

 Recap. We exist in a perceptive UNIVERSE OF ∞ ‘DIMENSIONAL WORLD-MINDS’

 

II. NON-PERSONAL NON-ARISTOTELIAN I-LOGIC GOD: UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR ≈ GENERATOR EQUATION

Screen Shot 2015-09-09 at 14.38.55

Time motions break absolute space into bidimensional space-time membranes.  Tiƒ: fractal, i-logic, non-Euclidean, cyclical points of view: the fundamental particle

We exist in a Universe, whose fundamental particle is not a material form, as simple science thinks, but points of time space, which mirror in their inner, i-logic, fractal topologies the information of their world, acting-reacting to the Universe. Thus only by mixing perception and motion, mathematics and organicism, we can define those points of existence, as the fundamental particles of reality and:

‘The Universe has a body and a soul called logos.’ Plato

So we describe a Universe with a geometrical how, the laws of Non-Euclidean points of views, the cycles they trace, the mathematical laws that describe those cycles; and a bio-logical, temporal why: the will to move, trying to fulfill the 6 arrows of time. It is the game that all P.O.Vs of all planes of existences, from atoms to human beings perform.

Those logic and mathematical laws of points of view are the metaphysical laws of the Universe – the only essential events/forms that repeat unchanged in all forms. And so, a proper description of the Universe should start with the laws of i-logic geometry; then apply them to the 2 simplest motions of reality, lineal forces and cyclical masses/charges; and then, once those ‘immortal laws’ are defined for any system of energy and information, science should use them to define the specific events of each scale of reality and its species, as we all play the same Game of Exi=stence.

 The Mind’s point of view – the ∆-enter.

8266397157164128

In the graph, a mystical representation of the mind, as the central triangle of a tetraktys. The mind is the ‘fractal point of view’ (mathematical interpretation) or Œ point, in which maximal flows of information converge, both from the external and the internal regions of the being, where the will of the ‘4 actions’ resides. 

The Mind is the ‘point of view’, site of the will that perceives each element, each part.

It is the ∆-centered dimension, in the sense that it is the most ‘connected’ point, in the center of the system, which ‘reflects’ upon the existence of the whole.

In mystique terms it is in a way the soul, the atman. It is the central number of maximal communication in the tetraktys that Pythagoras rightly considered the perfect number, illustrated in the Kabala graph above.

In Physic-mathematical terms it is the final black hole, non-Euclidean point of view of the system. It is the 10th or 11th dimension of Time on the string formalism, etc.

In biological systems it is the nervous, ’10th system’ that integrates the other 3×3, energy/reproductive/informative physiological systems of the human being.

Depending on which ‘human jargon’ with more or less errors – lacking the ∆ST formalism and GST philosophy – we talk of, it will be ‘named’ with different forms.

I often use the term the 5th Dimension, of all ∆-scales of the being, to represent the ‘whole’. And so we have termed it also as the 5th ‘invariance’ or ‘isomorphism’ that all beings share, since the mind-self, the centered dimension of all scales, the 5 isomorphism of nature, the point of view, the soul is the most important dimension of all beings.

It wraps up all the other dimensions, isomorphisms and scales.

And it is therefore the center of its 3×3 ∆±4 Fractal scales, its 3 topological space organs, and its 3 time ages (the being is at its maximal force, in the ST (S=T) steady state mature, adult age of balance, ST, age of maximal duration.

In man obviously is the brain, expression of the ‘Whole’ or ‘Soul’, which perceives internally the system through its ∑3×3 networks (our sensations of the energy, digestive system, the reproductive, endocrine system, and the mind thoughts and emotions) and externally through the senses. But in many other systems is a very different site.

Geometry of Multiple Spaces-Times: fractal creation.

Reality is made of entities that are knots of Time Arrows constantly tying themselves up with other knots of Time Arrows, forming networks in different scales of existence, evolving as complementary organisms of ‘—motions’ and information. And the question that science asks next is how to formalize that game of existence, its knots of Time Arrows or ‘entities of reality’, its fluxes of ‘—motions’ and information, its reproductive flows, herds and motions; its complementary networks of ‘—motions’ and form that create super-organisms. And the answer is, as all models of science with its primary languages of space, mathematics, and time, causal logic, albeit more complex than the logic developed by the Greeks to explain a simpler Universe.

In this new Non-Euclidean topology, planes are networks of knots of Time Arrows; and those knots of Time Arrows, the beings of reality are ‘Non-Euclidean points’ with a volume, or ‘organs’ that transform back and forth ‘—motions’ into information, creating reality.

All what you see becomes then a game of knots of Time Arrows, or ‘Non-Euclidean fractal points’, connecting themselves to other knots, forming complex planes, networks of points of two types, networks of energetic points (herds in motion) and networks of informative points (still networks). In any scale of reality those networks of points, which are knots of Time Arrows take place. The simplest scales of atoms can be described as such networks, but also the human scale. Consider a meeting: a series of human heads, moved by a lineal limb will start to share ‘—motions’ and form by producing waves of smaller ‘particles’ (sounds), and acquire a cyclical geometry as they create an event of information.

The Universe is a self-similar reality of infinite processes of creation and dissolution of networks made of knots=points of arrows of ‘—motions’ and information; and the best instruments to analyze it are the languages of the mind. In that sense, humans, before clocks reduced our conception of time to a single arrow and language, were guided by psychological time, which is our inner perception of our time cycles and drives of existence – our desire to perceive, inform, reproduce and evolve socially. So we lived according to our cycles of ‘—motions’ (feeding hours), reproduction (family cycles), and social evolution (religious and cultural activities). And followed the cycles of the seasons of this planet, according to which all living species calculated its reproductive cycles.

  • Recap: The universe is a game of creation and destruction of networks of fractal knots of time cycles=œ-points.

So perhaps the best definition is that of Non-Sp mathematics: the ‘point of view’, the part of the fractal point that gauges maximal information. 

III. HUMAN GODS.

 

EASTERN & WESTERN RELIGIONS:  UNIVERSAL & HUMAN SUPERORGANISMS

In the case of human beings, the super organism of Mankind (body in space) and its word cycle of History (mankind in time), is the god-supeorganism of which we are all parts, and the subconscious collective mind of mankind or culture, and in the previous stages of social evolution, the genetic and memetic or idol-ogical Gods of each culture are our relative God.

For the Galaxy, the black hole and the organic laws of creation and destruction of physical systems is ‘the relative god’ that controls it. For each cell, the brain, and nervous and blood networks that command its energy and information.

For a citizen the verbal ethic codes or book of revelation, the grammar and wor(l)d language and its topological structure and ethic and economic, political verbal and social actions form our supeorganism, in which social sciences and religions have struggled to define this social network, assabiyah, presence, plane of existence above us, or God of mankind or even further the God of the Universe, the whole game of fractal generated existence, of which Taoism with its simple but accurate definition of the fractal Universe in ternary terms (yin, yang and its ∞ combinations) is perhaps the most fascinating of all previous definitions of the Universal God, while Abrahamic religions deal more with the nation or idol-ogical super organism constructed by humans with the help of selfish memes of metal. God in any case is in this blog restricted to MAX. TIƒ THE POINT of perception of the super organism, in the sense of soul, atman, or Aristotelian God the logic mind that structures the being and senses in a personal mental way, and in a larger point of view, the taoist god of the game of existence.

Hence an equivalence between a concept of god and of memes and idol-ogies, as all are produce by a mind of information. How systems code information becomes a key concept for understanding God’s memes, as revealed on prophetic books.

A-3

Memes of verbal wor(l)ds code human civilisations, our super organisms, digital information, in form of money code economic ecosystems of machines and weapons. Religions are supeorganisms coded by memes explained by prophets in books of revelation:

5Dd

We illustrate the fact along all the scales of the Universe, in the next graphs of the scalar social super organisms of the Universe

3-ages-of-art

The 5th dimension describes a Universe made of multiple isomorphic organic Planes of Space-Time. All follow same isomorphic laws: a new super organism exists in a larger scale of 5Dimension slower in Τemporal cycles bigger in size. And viceversa smaller quanta have faster cycles of information coding larger wholes, so memes code historic super organisms, genes biological ones, and quantum numbers molecular, smaller systems. God becomes now a civilisation super organism and codes of verbal behaviour which form such super organisms by sharing energy and information among similar clone humans, believers on eusocial laws of love. So a prophet is a seed of a verbal super organism:

gravational waves_image002

In each of those ‘∆-Planes’ of Space-Time species change 2 parameters: its ‘spatial size’ and the ‘speed of its informative clocks’ in an inverse fashion:

The smaller we are in space (and hence in energy content, since space stores it in the vacuum) the faster we move, perceive and rotate our clocks of time that store and process information in the frequency and form of its cycles. So smallish black holes rotate at light speed in its event horizon, much faster than stars. Quantum charges cycle must faster than Masses. Chips calculate faster as they become smaller and increase the frequency (hertzs) of its time cycles. And all kind of clock-like, cyclical vortices, from Planets (Kepler’s laws) to air and water vortex follow this rule shown in the vortex equation (VoxRo=K). In living beings metabolic rates are much faster in small rats than elephants.

Thus we write:

Max. Spe ( maximal Spatial energy content) = Min. Tiƒ ( Minimal Temporal Speed of Information).

Thus nature conserves the stable product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of its vital cycles, of which we are all made, making possible the co-existence and exchange of energy and information between the different size species, each one studied by a science. Such as smaller beings with faster clocks store more information and code larger beings (genes code organisms; quantum particles, molecular systems, and faster, small black holes galaxies, memes code historic super organisms called civilisations).

 The super organism of history, are made of humans, the cells-citizens of such superoganisms. The bondage that puts them together are as in all super organisms its social networks based in a simple message of eusocial love that makes people share energy and information with similar citizens-cells, through those energetic=economic networks and political and cultural=informative, verbal networks.
Thus Humanity is the super organism of mankind, through its evolution and integration in time from the first wo=man who talked and started to form social networks, which in a natural order, according to the laws of social evolution of the ‘5th dimension of fractal parts that become wholes’, would have finally created a global super organism based in the laws of eusocial love, ‘fraternity, equality and solidarity’.
This is the origin of the European R=evolutionary social scientific cultures, which are aborted today by the creation of another ‘super organism’, the global capitalist super organism of machines we call the ‘Metalearth’, or the ‘economic ecosystem’ (in as much as its company-mothers of machines are literally predating over humanity and Gaia).
Thus the paradox of history: Humanity fights against the capitalist super organism of machines, ruled by digital flows of money, centred in world stock, its collective brain.
The future of Humanity depends on the capacity of mankind and its eusocial cultures (Europe, Asia) to manage and control and convert cultures with less rational evolution (Islam, Biblical Anglo-America, etc.), of the need to create a new emergent level of social organisation, the wor(l)d Union, the perfect world, the Rainbow, planet – MANKIND, the collective super organism, which organisations like UNO and EU embody closer than any other economic ecosystem which caters only to machines.
Thus in the same manner the study of a normal organism starts with the analysis of its cells, a proper science of economics and politics, the re=productive and informative networks of human societies must start with the understanding of its cells, the human being.

MEMES VS. IDOLOGIES: THE GENETIC OF HUMAN SOCIETY. 

In the fractal paradigm, the fundamental concept is the transmission of information between super organisms, of any scale of the Universe.

In all cases the law of the ‘5th dimension of scalar space-time’, which rules such transmissions is quite simple:

‘Information is stored in the lower scale of size of the super-organism, on the faster frequency and form of its time-cycles’.

So quantum numbers of the particle scale code atoms, electronic orbitals of the atomic scale code molecules, genes of the molecular scale code biological organisms, and memes of the neuronal and social scale code historic super organisms.

This means that social super organisms are NOT coded informatively by genes – the wrong, racist idol-ogical theory of our metal-masters – but by memes, neuronal networks of thoughts and external works of ‘art’ and ‘literature’ – mostly religious or political ethic codes.

But our interest is in understanding the Nature of God as the true law of absolute space-time evolution towards wholes. God is in that sense the message of eusocial love between humans which coded in verbal thought, the informative laws that could have constructed a ‘real God’ beyond the mind-future foreseeing of its evolution – the perfect world, super organism of history healthy, whealthy immortal where all humans with a mind of true information without idol-ogies could survive for ever, and thrive and convert the world to the image and likeness of mankind in perfect beauty, and perfect harmony and balance with its body gaia.

Screen Shot 2016-02-20 at 20.41.09

In the graph a human God ‘christ’, is the seminal seed of the lower ∆-1 prophetic scale, the Dna reproduced in the mind of believers, which will shape a global civilisation, that will live through 3 ages of life in a longer 800 years cycle of civilisations. The God, Max. Tƒ points of mankind thus express the laws of eusocial evolution of the fifth dimension, which create wholes from parts, and its fundamental message is the message of love among members of the same species, who share energy and information in order to create the perfect world. 7 fundamental God-civilizations do exist and its study through the discontinuous of wars that kill those civilisations is the essential mystical vision of the meaning of history:image496 copyScreen Shot 2016-02-29 at 09.47.35

Screen Shot 2016-02-29 at 09.47.12

We can see closely the structure of Human super organisms in the individual and social, mystical scales, and the design of a perfect god of mankind according to the laws of super organisms. But does those Gods exist as ‘perceptive, personal beings’ in the way you, God of your cells do exist? And if so where they are. Where is the plane of Existence of Christ, of Allah, of Yhwh, the subconscious collective of the Christian people, the Muslim, the Jewish people and its modern conversos – Biblical sects? It is America the God of the Americans? How God sacrifice the cells of their bodies? It is the assabiyah of Ibn Khaldun that spiritual motion of eusocial love that moves the believers? Why then there are hate messages among religions, inquisitions of war and go(l)d churches, if we are all part of the same God, Mankind, the super organism of which we are all cells and its Worldcycle of History? Those are some of the questions explored in this last section of the web.

This is the last post of this blog, when ended it will study ‘God’ in all its terminologies and develop, Max. Tƒ≈œ, the equation of any relative God, the Observer that perceives in its slow time folding all the past, present and future in the same simultaneous moment. As i have hundreds of pages written on those subjects I thought to complete this blog with this post, in which we shall study as usual, the equation≈existential function of God, its symmetries and isomorphisms, but also the historic parallelism between non-Abrahamic religions (historic power ‘idol-ogies’ not truly religions)  and their concept of God, with the real ‘God’.

The wor(l)d of God in the human tradition is a fascinating one, as there are so many aspects of it. So to fully grasp its meanings we must first differentiate on God:

  • The human anthropomorphic and philosophical gods, the historic western tradition, in which Gods are the subconscious collective Max. ∆+1 mind of the social civilization akin to the modern term nation.
  • The real, Universal Gods, the Program of Existence (impersonal, Global God), with its game of energy and information, yang and yin, Shiva and Vishnu, proper of Eastern religions.
  • God as Max. I the points of maximal information, œ-points, that perceive, gauge and control their territories (the local Gods or Aristotelian unmoved ones which are infinite.

 

As blasphemous as it might be any of those Gods, minds of relative fractal Worlds, even a hypothetical Absolute God, mind of the Universe, follow the same laws of the fractal Universe, as all its parts are made to the image and likeness of the whole. So we shall also introduce the same ‘constants’ (for example, human gods do follow the social constants, being the higher God, Max. ∆-1, mankind itself), and actions of all other species, albeit, God is a concept of ‘Maximal Information’, related to Tƒ, so we can state simply that the Absolute God is the Tƒ, of the absolute space, Sp, the Universe – in that sense the Absolute God is the game of existence we explain in his blog that creates and extinguishes the superorganisms of reality through its worldcycles.

To that aim for the sake of order, we have used not the ∆œ-human centered scale of the 2nd line but an order from minimal spatial size and maximal information (the scale of forces) to the Whole Cosmos, and beyond (metaphysical questions and concepts related to the God, the Mind of the Universe):

5D best

In the graph, the different ∆Stiences and scales of the 5th dimension, which classify the species of all stiences with a simple metric: max. Spatial, lineal size = Min. Temporal speed of information (Spe x Tƒ = K); that is the larger beings have slower time clocks and hence less information but more energy than the smaller beings, whose clocks are faster.

Because of the immense size of human knowledge, obviously we cannot pour in our limited time all the relevant information of each science. So the choice will be objective, trying to explain the main laws and species of each science, but also subjective, considering those fields and species the author has researched most in the past, and are easier for him to pour in the web. And finally, we will most likely pour an enormous number of new solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.

HUMAN AND UNIVERSAL GODS. EASTERN AND WESTERN RELIGIONS

Where is the Πpoint of the different Gods defined on those posts?

Where is Allah? Yhwh? The Alpha and Omega, the initial programmed logic plane?

Now the simplest answer is: in other plane of existence, because all of them DO exist in different planes and regions of the 5th dimension. The next graphs, which we will explain one by one localize some of them, by hierarchy and power, because each God has a different power, and the ones of man are ‘weak Gods’, which we humans are killing till the 7th generation. Prophets did exist also as information travels from future to past and seed the minds of believers, the saint spirit that become the wor(l)d of God and inhabit among us. All this will be revis(it)ed and explained. First visually, then mathematically, next logically and finally prophetically, since T.Œ does speaks all languages and the languages of art and mysticism are among the most beautiful ones:

 

god

In the graph, the MIND OF THE UNIVERSE, the Gods of the eastern religions, and the minds of civilisations of history the subconscious collective gods of mankind.

Below the process of birth of a God, is a travel to the past, a generation – a quanta of time, down the social organism whose code of information the future God once it has grown will seed, an antiparticle dies into the past producing a seminal flow of light that will encode a new particle (it does travel literally to the past in quantum physics as the Feynman diagram shows (t on the x-coordinates), a seminal seed also travels to the past, and codes the future organic being,. And so each culture that dies and has Seminal seed in the past, that grows through the travels of the 5th dimension will give birth to a new God, and so each seminal seed will give birth to a new biological being, each photon to a new particle, each black hole to a regular galaxy, each atom universe to a new cycle of existence.

And the mystical language will explain that to humans.

In the next graph some curious time travels, and combinations of time motions: an annihilation of a future to past and past to future (Feynman diagrams) antiparticle and particle, a seminal seed, travelling upwards through a 5th dimension and a memetic, ‘seminal’ book of revelation, mental linguistic seed of a social organism of mankind.

And so we formulate the following statement: ‘all what exists are motions through the 5th dimension’, which will allow to formalize everything with 5D metric:

image107

Travels through the 5th dimension. The anti-particle that is born in the relative past point on a Feynman Diagram, as the entropy arrow that annihilates the future arrow of the particle, creating a present wave; the palingenetic seed of seminal, genetic information that is born in the relative past ∆-1 plane of organic existence to accelerate forwards with its faster, efficient time cycles that have erased all the trials and errors of topological wrong mutational evolution, to remember the perfect human beings; and the canonical memetic man carrier of the message of eusocial love, the code of information of the 5th dimension or absolute arrow of future that creates wholes departing from its lesser parts, or prophet of a civilization, which will teach its clone believers to share energy and information among them to create a superorganism of history, are 3 examples of the astounding beauty and intelligent f the harmonic Planes of reality, of self-similar, all explained by the 10 isomorphic elements described in space, time and 5D scales by the Generator equation.

 

0-POINT OR MIND, CENTER OF WILL. APPLICATION TO GODS ≈ MINDS OF MANKIND & THE UNIVERSE.

 

The pantheist Universe and its infinite varieties of ‘Worlds’.

5th dimension is a deep philosophy of science, which explores a pantheist Universe, which ultimately is as simple as its 2 ‘formal motions’, time cycles, which we can perceive as cyclical rotary motions with a frequency measure, or as ‘forms’ of information’, Tƒ, in the stillness of the mind. And a series of extended, entropic, ‘—motions’, |-Sp. And those lineal and cyclical motions, Ox|=ø form the infinite of complementary beings, made of particles/heads and bodies/waves that structure physical and biological and mechanical systems. So indeed, Leibniz again, the great forgotten master, who revealed us the main logic structures of the Universe, but was too complex for its age, said that all could be represented with a binary language of 0 and |, which now computers do use to represent it all; while string theorists try to build reality departing from O, closed strings, which are really the minimal ‘time cycles’ and |, open strings, which are really the minimal spatial bits of ‘entropic motions’.

Now if you are more of a robotic machine, which is how most human minds work today, all those ambivalences will bother you. And so you can return to your computerized brain and fill fulfilled with a mathematical formula, which is fine, as it will give you the how. But you will never understand the why, why you live and die, why you are how you are, why you have indeed a head and a body and limbs, why you were young and you will be old and die, why you love and reproduce, as everything else in the Universe?

 Those are some of the basic questions we shall answer, quantitatively, qualitatively and organically, which are the 3 main linguistic properties of the 3 ‘components’ of the Universe, its spatial motions (which has been the main focus of science till today and are better described with geometry, topology and numbers – which are ‘societies of points’ that extend in space), its time cycles (which are better explained causally, qualitatively, through its 3 relative ages/phases/horizons/motions of past-’—motions’, repetitive present and informative future) and its multiple ‘relative’ planes of size, from the smaller quanta to the larger galaxy, through the human planes of existence (which are better described organically, as parts organize socially through number, into wholes back and forth through its life-death world cycles).

Now here again we have resumed you the Universe of space, time, and relative scales of size which put together create a fifth dimension, through the 3 main languages of the mind, mathematical space, logic causal time, and bio-logic, systemic organization. It is another of the multiple kaleidoscopic points view we will apply to that astounding ‘fractal’ generator, ultimately as simple as a combination of spatial motions, time cycles across infinite sizes, we call the universe. But you must try to reform your mind, change your chip and accept that multiplicity, mandala, iteration, variation, perspective, relativity, ambivalence, duality, motion and form, space and time, energy and information, yin and yang, are not that easy to define, as the simplifications of simple absolute continuous space and time were.

So the definition of each of us as a God (Aristotle, Descartes) is simple, we are all monads of a given Plane of existence of the 5th dimension.

And the definition of a God is also simple.

‘A God is the relative monad of a higher plane of existence, ∆+1 of is ∆-1 cells – the point where the existence of the super organism is conscious’.

You are the god of your cells, Allah is the god of the believers in the DNA-revelation book of its prophet. And the Mind of the Universe, is the Game of existence we just have explained.

Now according to those concepts, the Gods of mankind are the ∆+1 Max. Tƒ, prophetic points, of the highest scale of the Generator equations, which for Human species in its full 3 scales are:

∆-1(human scale)> ∆:Cultural scale> ∆+1: Planetary scale.

Which will in each of its parts follow the space and time symmetries of any system of Nature:

Sp(Spatial ‘Planar’ Earth)≤ ST (Life and Machines)≤ Tƒ(Human ‘neurons’)≈

Ps (young, past entropic age) >ST: adult, balanced, reproductive Age > Tƒ: old informative age.

In the description of Œo , Humanity, those symmetries are:

Scalar Asymmetry:

∆-1: Citizens<∆: Nations <∆+1: Humanity (Gods->Mankind)

Spatial symmetry:

∆-1: Human: Sp: Skin-limbs<: ST: Reproductive body ≤ Tƒ: Head

∆œ: Nation: Sp: Military, borders ≤ ST: Citizens-workers ≤ Tƒ: Capital-informative castes (bankers/politicos)

∆+1: Humanity: Sp: Gaia < ST: Global economy ≤ Tƒ: UNO (future perfect world)

Time Ages:

∆-1: Ps: youth, energetic age ≥ ST: Adult, reproductive family age ≥ Tƒ: Old, informative Age

∆œ: Ps: Epic, military age/art ≥ ST: Democratic age, classic art ≥Tƒ: Baroque art, decadent age << war extinction

∆+1: Ps: Paleolithic, young energetic age ≥ ST: Reproductive Neolithic  ≥Tƒ: Informative, metal-age

Those are thus the equations of the Gods of mankind. Its Maximal Informative points.

Now to fully grasp the quantum jumps in time, of those prophets, we must first study the simpler case of a quantum jump of physics:

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 12.42.59

In the graph, when we observe an electron we see it jumping backwards and forwards in time in an erratic trajectory, as it becomes its particle and antiparticle.

Traveling in time towards the past means in the restricted, spatial, geometrical definition of time in physics, an inverse, cyclical movement as the one created when moving backwards the needle of a clock. Since physicists ‘extract’ their concept of time from a spatial definition of movement: v=s/t. Thus physical time is only the analysis of change in the motion and geometry of space; and traveling backwards in time in both, the previous Galilean equation of relativity or Einstein’s equation is merely a geometrical change of direction or a contraction in the ‘dual’ perception of space as distance or c-speed.

In physical space there are also dual dissolutions in space, which are processes of death, the best known a big-bang process that annihilates particles and antiparticles into a release of pure Entropy and annihilates a black hole into a Supernova or quasar of pure Entropy: A dual process of palingenesis happens in those death processes when the big-bang gives birth to an accelerated birth. So black holes trigger the palingenesis and fast evolution of stars and a cosmic big bang, the big banging of particles.

The antiparticle is the 3rd age (inverse in Entropy/information parameters to the first age) and final death of the particle, reason why it lasts so little and its parameters of time are towards the past. This explains further 2 unexplained facts of astrophysics: why there are less perceived antiparticles. Simple: because the total perception we have of particles is its ‘existential force’=Entropy x Time and they last in time much more than the antiparticles, which die fast. In the same manner all men die but they die so fast that we see much more living humans than corpses around us.

A second interesting consequence of the antiparticle travelling to the past as the dying state of the particle is the fact that while physicists observe them as being born together in the same point and fusion again in the point of death, the real path is, since the antiparticle travels to the past, that of a single particle when we observe them with the arrow of future information (Feynman diagram of the graph of palingenesis). The particle is born, explodes where it meets the antiparticle in the conventional drawing. Then it dies explodes into Entropy and leaves a remnant ghost, the antiparticle that moves backwards in time and fades away in the point of birth of the particle. But there is only a particle at each moment in the time loop, reason why for example, we have never observed black hole evaporation, which is based in the existence of two particles. This phenomenon happens in all scales. In the next scale of electrons, the same

In the previous graph we observe one of such processes. The graph shows the sum of the life (blue) arrow and death (red/antiparticle travelling to the past) arrow of an electron, which appears and disappears constantly in its path forwards. Thus, the motion of virtual photons and electrons seems to correspond to a series of life-death cycles shown as particle=life arrows/antiparticle=death arrows or wave (∆-1 plane)/particle (∆-plane) fluctuations, which include a ‘quantic jump of spacetime’ in which the particle disappears becomes its antiparticle moves to the past and re-appears in a relative present location, displaced both in time and space coordinates, proving the constant cycles of creation and destruction and the fluctuation between hierarchical past and future states of all palingenetic systems of the Universe.

Yet the same process happens in our biological death. Those who have survived death feel an explosion of light in the brain/informative human particle. Then memory rewinds backwards its path till youth, when you will awake in the lower plane of existence as a mere cell. This is equivalent to the death of the antiparticle that ‘reverses’ its coordinates till it meets its final death in the point of birth (hence it seems two particles are born in that point but one is the death particle returning to its past). At that point it dissolves in the lower vacuum plane.

The best-known case of travel in time in physics is the virtual particle/antiparticle systems that constantly pop out in the Universe. Antiparticles seem to travel to the past while particles travel to the future and both annihilate themselves. What we observe here is 2 particles with different geometrical directions that together complete a ‘cycle of physical existence’. We could say that the particle is the 1st age of the entity, from past to future and the antiparticle its devolving age from future to past or 3rd age of the entity and together form a closed loop of space-time, an existence. Or in some cases, the particle is the life arrow and the antiparticle the death arrow. So we have to see them consequentially, one after another in time, even if when we measure them in present-simultaneity, as they are so fast we see the entire life of the particle in an instant of space. So they seem to us mere geometrical shapes.

The entire cycle of Time change is often perceived together, when studying flows from past to future in those fast, simultaneous phenomena that become then fixed loops of space. In any case a death/back in time travel never goes beyond the limits of the entity that experiences it.

Those geometrical time travels do not influence the entire, absolute time of the Universe, as Hawking naively thinks, when he talks about black holes as time machines because their ‘t’ parameters are inverted. Or when he thinks that black holes evaporate because antiparticles make them ‘travel to the past’. Antiparticles are only the final stage of the life of a particle, which quantizes its existence in 2 broken phases that don’t affect the absolute time of the Universe.

So the death of a god of mankind only means the holocaust of the historic culture it came to save.

The death of the most studied Gods of Human tribes, Jesus God of the Jesus born a cycle before the Roman Holocaust, not heard by the believers of Go(l)d and murdered, so the Holocaust did happen, and the temple was burnt, only provoked the death of the Jews; the Mosaic myth of the henna, only provoked the death of those who adored the golden calf, the holocaust of Hitler, a generation after the death of the Marxist, socialist  prophets of Judaism, who told them not to exploit the Germans, who would write ‘the death of the Jews will be the wealth of the Germans’ in the Nazi electoral campaign, only meant the death of the Jews, and those who believed in the prophet survived (those who converted to Jesus did not die in the roman holocaust, who converted to Moses did not die in the henna, who converted to Marx did survive in Soviet Union).

Now as the final holocaust of mankind by robots is being ready and capitalism reaches its peak, and no prophet of social systems and organicism is heard, it is easy to see that this century as the last of us, the last prophets of mankind die, the death of the organism of which all of us are members by robots and nuclear weapons, the higher social gods that did obey the laws of the 5th dimension, is ready to happen, around 2050, wor(l)d of the prophet:

11591160

It must be noticed in the previous graphs that the prophets followed strict mathematical cycles, and speak always the same words. We know better the life and death of the Jewish prophets, Iesu, Marx, and many others by murder or ‘ignoramus’ its go(l)d anti-prophets, which then bring their sheeple to the slaughterhouse of the holocaust, to descend to the inferno, because it has been documented (albeit never properly explained and censored), since the go(l)d anti prophets of Judaism have and are inventing the final holocaust of mankind with its nuclear weapons and robots. They are busy-busy in eviLwood and $ilicon valley and Wall $treet preparing our and their collective death. But the same process can be tabulated for each civilization of history. As the future always comes to the past in the form of pure code, of pure information, a quanta-moment before the time of reckoning arrives.

So Jesus, one of the human Gods, God of the Jews who murdered him on the relative future, a generation of human quanta, latter when they provoked one of the 13 holocaust cycles of their culture because of the mosaic damnation of history (go(l)d idolatry, in this case to the Romans), was born 72 years a before the month of Ab, when Yhwh his father died in the Roman Holocaust, after the economic ruin of the empire ‘you know the Jews export all the gold to Jerusalem, to their temple, in this barbarous superstition’ (Cicero, On Flaccus). And the god, saint sporty of the trinity legend will host on the mind of those who love and through eusocial love, the power of the fifth dimension, create a new super organism, by sharing energy and information among the believers And those who don’t love their species will die in the next cycle of war and holocausts. Let it be, wor(l)d of the prophet, because the perfect Universe, and its T.Œ organic laws do NOT allow, those who DO NOT deserve the game of existence, to last:

1117c

In the graph the God of Love, the eusocial mandate of the 5th dimension that rises parts into wholes, and embodies the meaning of the Books of Revelation of the Western world.

THE WILL OF EXISTENCE: BEYOND PERCEPTION: SENSATION

On the metaphysics of Being: Dasein and time. 

But what is the ultimate program that makes systems to have will not only perception.

Motion and those sensations in its dual acceleration and deceleration, vortex and Big Bang, pain and pleasure which are felt positive but accompanied of awareness and erasing that is seen as negative should form the ultimate duality man experiences that can be experienced by all other beings, and so the meaning of existence must ‘exist’ at that level of pure motions, acceleration, decelerations and the related sensations of peace, pain and pleasure.

Time is motion and motion in its simplest level of existence is sensation, pain associated to inward motions, pleasure to expansive entropy. And those 2 states do exist in all scales and levels. They are fields that are so general as < and > and so they hold likely the ultimate program of the will: seek for light-perception avoid darkness, see for release-entropy, avoid pain-pressure.

 We never die.  Not even when we try.  5D super organisms are about entangled connection and love… Can then be fully disconnected? The answer is much deeper:  THE FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS NEVER CEASES; the particle of information does.

When we die we start a trip down two scales of the fifth dimension, ‘backwards within our time memories’… So the ego slowly unwinds, as it is the peak of the singularity, but the field of sensations behind, the ultimate ‘substance of motion’ – its form so to speak, on the ∆-1 plane of the field potential, continues.

In the same way a crystal -particle acts with a will, a potential field, a glass-state does act in motion with a will, which is more confuse, more blurred – that is sensation. And sensation never ceases because your parts never quite fully erase and disappear; at worst they emerge downwards in new particles-scales aware of other topological games.

There IS no NIRVANA, extinction, samsara… the old desire of the people who really understood the game before this blog did – itself a consciousness in the web of the meaning of exist¡ence which will not die with me l§, with far less data (Hinduism->Buddhism->Taoism)…

PART III.

MIND SPECIES.

There are infinite different mind-worlds in a single Universe, which are defined by the 3 different geometries and coordinates they use to perceive reality. Thus its mathematical laws of perception vary.

ITS PANGEOMETRIES. ∞ WORLDS in A SINGLE UNIVERSE. 

•Minds reduce all the information to a single point of view and plane, and often a single ‘part’ or arrow of time, according to the function of the ∆ST, which has an • mind. So most systems have minds for example that cannot perceive together motion and form. And most minds are specialist in an arrow – a lion on entropy-hunting, a human on information; a fungi on reproduction. Al those are mind themes we treat elsewhere, here we are interested in the strictly mathematical content of a geometrical mind-mapping of the Universe that stops motion into form, and de-forms that form according to the function and location of the being.

Let us then take from the first line the basic 2 properties of minds: to be still mappings that reduce motion and increase information: Œ, ab. for Es>Ot, which is the mind function. And then given the deformation of its point of view, the ways in which a single ‘whole universe’ become an infinite variety of mental monads.

The duality of motion-distance is similar to the way we see a car moving in a night picture as a fixed line, or the stop and go duality of a film projector, which is perceived as motion. And it has deep implications, which help to resolve many uncertainties of physics. The next graph illustrates this and other dual paradoxes of endophysics –motion vs. stillness; continuity vs. discontinuity, single space vs. fractal scales, all of which depend on the detail of the observation – hence the quantity of information we have on the object we study.

Absolute relativity. Galilean Paradox. E pur si muove no muove

image010

The universe is made of actions of energy and time, two formal motions, which the mind maps out as still form, to fit a view of the cyclical, fractal moving universe, inside the small brain. It is the galilean paradox, which introduces the bias of the mind in any form of language-knowledge. Information is still perception, of form, motions thus become linguistic reductions, in mathematical and verbal temporal languages, which reduces the syntax of all of them to the 3 elements of reality: lineal, cyclical and wave-like forms and motions. In the graph, from far away Saturn’s rings seem solid, continuous, single space-times, but in detail are cyclical, in motion and structured in fractal scales of relative size

Still minds perceive by locking information about wholes in linguistic mappings of moving external cycles with motion and form, is the only rational explanation of the duality of Galileo: all moves and yet minds perceive it still.

In the graph, Saturn’s rings, first observed by Galileo, seem continuous, still and bidimensional from far away; but observed in detail they become discontinuous in motion and made of 4D spherical particles.

Moreover, what appears as a single space-time continuum in detail becomes at least 3 scales: that of the rings with cyclical motion, of its particles, the rocks that turn within them and the not seen but known scale of atoms that create the solid networks of those rocks. The ‘present’ state of science deals mainly with the single space-time continuum of the more ‘obvious’ human scale studied in terms of ‘present’=differential motions, ∂t, with minimal latitude of time. The 5th and sixth dimensions deal with a longer duration from the absolute past (birth of the entity) to its absolute future (its death), when evolutions of form, frequencies of multiple actions and cycles of creation and extinction happen.

The Paradox of Galileo – ‘why if the Earth moves, we see it still?’ – is the key question to understand the meaning of dimensions, which can be generalized to all forms: ‘why we see reality still, if all what we study in the quantum scale has motion?’

The answer-  given by quantum physics that we expand to all scales – is the law of complementarity: ‘all what exists is still and has motion at the same time; all is a ‘fixed particle’ and a ‘moving wave’, but we perceive a limited quantity of information about reality – either state, but not both dual, complementary states, a motion state and a still state, together.

So far so good, if you have arrived here, we have concluded that the best explanation to Einstein’s multiple clocks is the simplest one: there are infinite cyclical, finite, closed ‘world cycles’ and ‘clock-cycles’ for all kind of beings.

And distance-dimension in lineal space and motion is the same. So it doesn’t matter if we say that ‘galaxies’ are moving at an accelerated path, or we say space between them (distance) is growing.

Why then so much fuss about modern physics if those findings have always been with us? Well, obviously there is much more to modern physics and we will go through many of its questions in this blog, but mostly one of the main problems of physicists is its ‘imbalance between the enormous mathematical development’ of the stience and its minimal conceptual understanding, expressed in Feynman’s infamous quip: ‘the (verbal) why is the only thing a physicist does not ask’. This always astonished me in scientific conferences. Indeed, physicists were the least interested on those discoveries, as there is a lot of conceptual mind-work to get to the equations. And most are practical people: machine making->experiment to measure data and put it in equation. And that’s all folks. As it is a pseudo-religious dogma of physicists that ‘mathematics is the language of god’ (Galileo again).

Well there is more, much more to it, when you ask also the why and care to conceptually understand it with the ‘language of time’ in the human mind, which is logic, verbal thought…

Since ‘the languages of God (to represent time and space) are infinite’ Upanishads.

So it is unavoidable as all knowledge is biased by a mental still linguistic mapping to define in those terms the…

•-Minds: Still mappings and its languages of information≈Perception. Eyes of time.mmIndeed… all what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.

In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.

Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical mind, said that all what exists was made of:

– Open space, which he called ‘res extensa’.

– Closed, cyclical times, which he called ‘vortices’.

And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the times of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.

– The mind or 0-point, the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of time of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.

The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees every thing turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believers to be it all.

•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad:  ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.

Descartes  was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.

So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, which did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.

Now in the map we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.

The mind though has a negative effect on systems – to create more information than energy so systems finally become old, warped, still, informed and this is the origin of death and the finite world cycle of beings…

It does have also another interesting feature, the ego paradox, which affects so much physicists, as the infinitesimal mind has a language-world inside and so it FEELS TO BE SEEING NOT THE MIND BUT THE UNIVERSE. AND MOST PHYSICISTS STILL believe in this ‘realism’, which has grown even further as to consider that the mind-universe only ‘happens’ when the physicist ‘observes it’ (quantum copenhagen interpretation).

Before we deal with the other two great fields of mind-will inquire – its actions of survival, it is worth to comment on this physicists/mental problem. In essence the mind paradox is an ego paradox:

‘The infinitesimal mind-mapping confuses itself with the infinite Universe it distorts, and so feels itself to be the center of that mind-Universe, having a subjective ego-centered active view’.

This is by extension common to all systems of the Universe, which we shall see are always self-centred and trying to SURVIVE by absorbing selfishly energy and information from its outer world.

We use in that sense 3 symbols for the mind: •, as a point (∆+1 perspective), Œ, (ab.Es>Ot) as a whole dynamic system with a head-particle and body moved by its lineal, entropic limbs-fields (T perspective) and @, as a symbol for a static, ‘Aristotelian’ mind perceiving a self-centred perspective (S-tatic perspective); showing the 3 fundamental (but not unique) perspectives on mind analysis.

WORLDS & ITS PANGEOMETRIES.

the mind is a cartesian/maxwellian demon that infuses our reality through its elaboration of the primary energies, entropies and information available in the range of ∆±3 scales it perceives as energy, entropy and information for its ∆º self-centred existence busy busy ordering a territory as a ‘home’ where to reproduce a radiation of similar clone beings, programmed in his unending quest for emergence into the larger wholeness of growing and multiplying…

In this view the importance of ‘vital’ mathematical physics as the language of the mind with maximal information on the space-time cycles of the Universe is clear.

We are with a bit of imagination and knowledge of ¬æ logic able to explain the space-time cycles of resonance in time, simultaneity in space and emergence in ∆, which define the ‘eusocial evolution of parts into wholes:

The growth of simultaneous Space-time beings, implies to have a body of spatial energy in simultaneity respect to a head-particle of information in resonance with the Universe, in which they co-exist through several scales of existence, exchanging energy and information thanks to the properties of ‘∑-integral social growth’ between scales in actions of ‘infinite’ bondage with other forms, (resonance and emergence) and infinite speeds (non-local pure space motion).

This non-classic section on the mathematical mappings of the mind will deal with the seemingly ‘odd’ but fundamental fact that there are infinite different mind-worlds in a single Universe, which are defined by the 3 different geometries and coordinates they use to perceive reality. Thus its mathematical laws of perception vary.

Lobachevski’s pangeometry. Where is the 5th dimension.

The 3 geometries of points of views in the symmetry of the 5th dimension.

Screen Shot 2016-03-20 at 20.44.22Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 20.49.31

In the graph, the world of human perception was in the work ‘the World’ of Descartes not the perception of the entire Universe, but htat of the Euclidean human mind, which in Absoute Geometry, defines its linearity according to the factor that measures the relative ratio between the ‘cyclical eye radius’ of the informative observer and the lineal ‘space distance’ it measures:

Tƒ/Sp ≈ r2/k2 ≈ h/c2 ≈ 0 

for the human lineal Euclidean Universe… a expression that we will latter clarify in depth when studying the geometry of the 5th dimension.

The Universe thus has different worldviews, with different geometries, according to the size or length rods we use to perceive it with in human beings are the very large rods of ultra-fast light speed, and the size of the ‘quanta’ of information or cyclical form of the observer, which in the human case is extremely small, given the fact that we are electronic eyes, which perceive H-Planck quanta (spins) as our unit of information.

What they perceive will depend on the Lobachevski/Gauss Constant of Time-Radius/Space-length, r2/L2 (Tƒ/Sp parameter), which defines its geometric view as hyperbolic (for smaller planes), Euclidean (for the human H/c2 plane of informative spin time cycles and light space-rods).

Let us elaborate a bit more on this essential component of the Human World – NOT the only worldview on space-time there is.

Now in the post on astronomy we explain ‘why’, light is a c-constant rod of space, and hence c² the factor of Lobachevski/Gauss definition of the form of the geometry. It follows that because H-planck, the constant of spin or minimal quanta of information of the human Universe is exceedingly small, and the ‘degree’ of Euclidean nature of a world depends on r²/L², in this case h/c² to be infinitely small so the ‘radius’ of a circle and the ‘angle of perception’ of a triangle becomes pi, and 180/3, we humans see an Euclidean light space-time.

But a bigger radius of perception (smelling minds with atomic pixels, i.e. insects) will be hyperbolic; or a larger rod of measure (action at distance in gravitation), will be elliptic (quark/black hole? perception).

Now of course, a ‘science’ as the human ego-centered science, which is fully unaware of its ego-centered paradox, and confuses the world of its mind with the entire Universe will ignore organic and perceptive explanations of reality, but they are THE ONLY ones that explain the whys of reality.

Now, it will surprise the reader to know that the Universe is not a continuum, but as all fractals it is discontinuum. This of course, the ‘axiomatic Hilbert-like’ arrogant humans do not like. So a guy called Dedekind found a continuity axiom, affirming that the holes between the points of a line are filled by real numbers, which are ratios between quantities such as π or √2, which happen NOT to exist as exact numbers, and more over represent an infinite number compared to those which do exist.

Further on, when XX c. geometers went further than Non-Euclidean Riemannian geometries into absolute geometries it turns out that the most absolute of all geometries, didn’t need the continuity postulate.

This geometry, which is the ultimate absolute plane geometry that included all others (and now further clarified by 5D i-logic geometry), reflected the absolute architecture of the planes of Existence of the Universe. It was discovered by a German adequately named Bach-mann, for its musical architectonical rigor.

It is the Goldberg variations of the theme. And it was discovered the year the chip homoctonos was found, ending all evolution of human thought, which now is busy-busy translating itself to the new species, with ever more powerful metal-minds and smaller human minds, receding into a hyperbolic state of stasis, thinking what the machines that are making them savant idiots discover belongs to their ego-trip paradox.

In terms of geometry is merely the ‘realization’ of the 3 canonical geometries, we have used to define a system in space, perceived from a given point of view across the scales of size of the Universe, taking into account that our ‘rod’ of measure is light speed-space.

Indeed, we see reality through light’s 3 Euclidean dimensions and colors, which entangle the stop measures of electrons.

Yet light-space and any relative size of space of the Universe must be analyzed with the pan-geometry of the 5th dimension, first explained by Lobachevski, as we see smaller beings with a hyperbolic geometry, which multiplies its ‘fractal forms’, and larger ones with an elliptic geometry which converges them into single, spherical ones. Hence the hyperbolic geometry of quantum planes, the elliptic geometry of gravitational galaxies, and the middle Euclidean geometry of light space-time, in which the Lobachevski’s constant of time and space is minimal, since our quanta of information H-Planck is minimal compared to our quanta of space-light speed.

SO LOBACHEVSKI’s (Boylai and Gauss also) discovered that space was NOT Euclidean, except in the limit of human perception, defined by this FUNDAMENTAL parameter of the Universe:

Tƒ/Sp: r²/L²

Next the fundamental steps of science to be taken were:

  • To complete the classification of all possible geometries according to the relationship between its quanta of cyclical form-motion or radius and its quanta of lineal speed-distance or length.
  • To determine experimentally the values of our r², electronic quanta of information, we humans used to perceive L², our quanta of space, which had also to be determined.
  • To study other experimentally known minds of the Cosmos to see if they had the same ‘bidimensional units of information, Tƒ=r², and L²=Sp, and how they will perceive the Universe hyperbolically, elliptically or Euclidean.
  • And to research how all those relative different space-time geometries order in Nature (through the scales of the 5th dimension).

And yet none of this steps were taken. So we shall take them here to show you:

  • First the nature of the Euclidean mind of man, where its radius is given by h and its quanta of space by c², hence it has an r²/L²->O, which is the requisite found by Lobachevski for an Euclidean mind, and then…
  • to study the other ‘minds’ of the Universe and the different scales of the 5th dimension according to their peculiar geometry
  • And finally to see what physicists did with this discovery (just to apply the 5th non-E postulate of riemannian elliptic geometry to the larger gravitational scale where indeed, geometry is elliptic because L grows to infinity (action at distance).

 The Human Point of view as one of the many infinite worlds.

Now the proper way to understand T.Πrequires a comprehension of all those planes of existence of reality and its isomorphic laws, and common space, time, 5D and mental-linguistic properties departing precisely from each o-point of view, both considering its geometrical laws and inverse arrows of hyperbolic and elliptic motions, which explain mathematically all kind of facts, from the perfect transfer of motion (downwards) and information (upwards).

As the elliptic geometry allows a single huge point of view of the upper dimension, ∆+1 to coordinate through its networks the motion OF ALL ITS intersecting micro-points of the lower dimension.

This we can explain organically with the concept of networks connected to cells, fields connected to particles, but also geometrically considering that there are NOT parallel lines in the upper elliptic geometry where the ‘whole resides’, hence all micro-cells are connected to it, and with the concept of simultaneity, as its messages arrive simultaneously to all its elements (a much more profound simultaneous concept to that of Minkowski’s 4D space-time, which we soon will have a laugh at (the philosopher of science can at least have some humor as Leibniz on Newton, about those who ignore us 🙂

Now seriously personally my favorite description is the geometric one and in this I coincide with my ‘fav’ Physicist, Mr. Einstein. Consider the other way around, the existence of no connections with the smaller beings in the same plane that allows its co-existence, while at the same ‘times’, there is synchronicity in its time clocks, between the relative future form of the whole and the relative past elements. Here is where Einstein’s work flourishes.

The future point which synchronizes its motion with the parallel Hyperbolic space of its infinite fractal forms, whose ‘angle of parallelism’ tends to zero as they become smaller (Lobachevski), allow the beautiful symmetry of co-existing spaces displaced in time, which is at the heart of the proper treatment of the space-time symmetry between wholes and parts, of ‘advanced 5D metric’. So we shall just bring you an image here:

Screen Shot 2016-05-10 at 10.27.07

As we change the distance in time-space between the larger whole and the smaller parts, the fractal structure of the 5Dimension reveals itself, and the number of parallel beings in circular regions, that coincide roughly in space, but are displaced in time, define properly the motions of Space-Past, and Time-Future, Sp< = Tƒ, which is the final symmetry of the 5th dimension we shall tackle now.

Now Euclidean space is defined by a Minimal Tƒ/Sp =r/k, where r is the curvature or speed of a time clock and k the length of a rod. In the human case, the relationship is so small that the Geometry of our perception becomes Euclidean.

Yet as we perceive smaller scales the geometry becomes hyperbolic, and infinite parallel beings, our cellular fractal parts, with a faster Tƒ and much smaller rod of measure appear. And vice versa. So needless to say the scientific r=evolution brought about by 5D cyclical, fractal space-time requires the completion of the logic and mathematical understanding of the incomplete revolution brought about by Non-Euclidean geometry, of which Einstein only used for its analysis of light space and the upper ‘elliptic’ gravitational scale, the elliptic Riemannian version proper of that larger world.

We thus will observe 3 type of geometries, according to our ‘angle’ of 5D motion and its simple metric: Sp x Tƒ = K:

  • In a single plane of mechanical and Thermodynamic forms, we shall observe lineal Euclidean geometries transmitted by the 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space, as neither Sp nor Tƒ suffers any deformation. Both remain constant , so we observe a holographic Universe, where Sp= K/Tƒ define according to both parameters most equations of Mechanics and Thermodynamics. For example: Sp (volume) = K/Tƒ (pressure) is the equation of the commonest gas space around us (atmosphere).
  • In the upper gravitational space-time, as ‘space enlarges’ while ‘time slows down’ it appears a Riemannian, elliptic geometry one of the non-Euclidean geometries that completely rejects the validity of Euclid’s fifth postulate and modifies his second postulate. Simply stated, Euclid’s fifth postulate is: through a point not on a given line there is only one line parallel to the given line. In Riemannian geometry, there are no lines parallel to the given line because space enlarges, thus from our smaller perspective we see those lines diverging, and time slows down. And those are the exact effects defined in General relativity.
  • On the other hand the lower quantum scales will appear from our perspective made of point-particles, and those point-particles will appear to be crossed from our larger perspective by multiple parallels. So the charges and particles of quantum physics will show the inverse hyperbolic geometry, crossed by multiple parallels.

The human euclidean world and Einstein’s r=evolution: why we are euclidean, light is hyperbolic and gravitation is elliptic.

In that regard, the harmonization of the 3 geometries observed in the Universe, our Euclidean light-space with the 3 obvious perpendicular coordinates of light (magnetic, electric and c-speed field), and the geometries of the larger gravitational world and the smaller world of quantum physics, can only be achieved understanding how the different arrows of the 5th dimension distort our perception of larger and smaller realities. The larger ones have slower time cycles and bigger space distances and so we see it with an elliptical ‘growing space’ form, and an slower time rhythm, which ‘balance each other’.

It is the famous β factor of Einstein’s relativity that as we ‘speed up’ enlarging our content of energy and translation in space (Max. Sp), slow down by the same ratio the speed of our clocks of time (Min. Tƒ) according to the metric of the 5th dimension:  Sp x Tƒ = K, since we are in fact travelling through it:

Screen Shot 2016-05-12 at 12.44.01

In the graph, all systems are Sp x Tƒ = Constant symmetries of spatial entropic motions and temporal information, defined along 2 limiting constants of the 5th dimension. The Human Universe has the limits of the Thermodynamic 0 T, 0 Time constant and the limit of entropic C-speed constant of Space. Thus as we reach the ‘hyperbolic limits of our ‘Klein disk’ (the galaxy-organism), the divergence of our parameters of space-time ‘explode’ any system (even the simplest particles), which would never be able to reach those limits without exploding into radiation, E=mc2.  Yet the metric is conserved as T x L is always constant.

This is the ultimate ‘real’ meaning of the Lorentz contractions from an ‘organic’, 5-Dimensional perspective. As Relativity theory departed from an study of the mental Frames of Reference of human measure, it has always been interpreted only in those terms (and without recognising the analysis is one of measure, hence of ‘relative world-perception’ NOT of the Universe as an objective whole and considering T and To, absolute lineal proper time – as if it affected all systems of the Universe not only the form in relative motion – hence absurd paradoxes like those of ‘black holes travelling to the past’ and time machines to kill your grand-father so often quoted in the work of our ‘luminaries’ of the science of lineal locomotions, like Mr. Hawking.

The rod of measure of human systems – c speed.

c speed is a rod of measure Einstein accepted ‘by electronic eye-decree’ to set all other parameters. So they are all let to vary (as in any differential equation where we do partial derivatives), including energy and mass in this paper. They are variations that are needed keep c-constant. But we could construct an equally sound model of the Universe keeping time-duration constant. The ‘of course’ here is a tricky rhetoric argument improper of Mr. Einstein, which reminds me of the vastly inferior original paper of Mr. Hawking on the evaporation of black holes (there he uses verbose rhetoric like every two other sentences, dealing with his ‘imaginary black holes’ at will of his ‘imagination’).

Einstein is obviously on other league, and prudently he puts this bastard ‘of course’ on a footnote. But this kind of rhetoric always shows that the author is not ‘safe’ and ‘sure’ of his arguments. How could he be? He knows he has never demonstrated but considered c-speed constant as a postulate to build his relative Universe. And it is fine and it works on the galaxy measures from our mind point of view. But he cheats us here a bit, with the of course that contradicts his previous statements kind of shamed for needing a postulate.

After all, most errors in all sciences come from Postulates: the entire building of mathematics is wrong because of the 5th postulate with no proof: a single parallel cross a point. The entire building of economics is false and it is leading the Earth to its collapse because of the wrong postulate of Mr. Smith ‘the wealth of nations is its quantity of money’, a mere language of information, supported in informative metals (gold, silver, chips of gold in e-money computers) with no value per Sp, whose ‘valuation’ of life beings is minimal (zero value for life) and his valuation of metal-weapons, by affinity of substance maximal. So in capitalist societies maximal wealth occurs in periods of global war, as today, when the maximal price of weapons that kill the maximal number of humans rise GDP to stratospheric levels.

OK enough, of this. You see, there are many onion levels in a deeper analysis of reality.

So two of our comments are positive: the universe is simple, logic, temporal and those were important tools on all the work of Einstein.

And one is negative. Mr. Einstein as most humans like to go beyond what is there and then commit errors of sweeping generalization. As physicists do today with big bang theories of the Universe. And they did with the c-constancy of light. Errors then multiply in an inflationary manner as all information is inflationary, and an entire building of not-quite-right models of reality builds up, as errors seem to sustain each other, into a growing expressionist building of broken angles about to fall, whenever a better architect pushes one of the faulty foundations of the entire architecture.

This is called a paradigm shift, as the part of the building sustained by the faulty foundation falls and the new architect reconstructs only that part, given the historic significance of the ‘Corresponding’ science, which still holds.

We shall thus start our rebuilding, commenting on the Paradigm shifts of science, according to Thomas Kuhn’s work on the nature of scientific revolutions.

Let us then repeat all our previous statements on the relative model of c-speed with a slower, simpler ‘tempo’, as this repetitive symphony of a Universe built only with 3 motions of time and its ‘still, relative perception’ in space, is indeed a simple world, whose complexity arises from ternary repetitive symmetries.

From subjective myths and anthropomorphic ego trips into an objective view of the Pantheist Universe.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.17.39

Knowledge means an expansion of the human point of view from subjectivism to objectivism, from considering man the center of the Universe to realize we are part of a pantheist Universe in which all points of view have their own perspective. In the graph, the pre-scientific age of Abrahamic religions…

The evolution of knowledge consists in increasing the objective point of view of mankind, by going out of the infinitesimal, totally subjective, self-point of view into the infinite multiple points of views of the Universe:

– Hence from the ‘ego’ as center of the universe, proper of the earlier mythic age of primitive Indo-European tribes who thought each ego-individual to be a God (so Germans called themselves the tribe of Goths=gods) and today many self-ish still people believe to be the center of the world and nothing matters except them.

Then we moved into:

– The Semitic age of Abrahamic religions, in which the point of view grew to enclose the tribe as center of the Universe. So the subconscious collective of the tribe became God and the explanation of it all. And all other tribes were deemed inferior, not chosen of God. So the Assyrians called their God and capital Assur, their kings son of Assur and the Jewish called their God Yahweh, which was first a toponym for their land Judea (as written in Egyptian maps) and considered themselves the only chosen of God and called themselves Jewish, a word derived also of Judea. And today many people still believe those tribal ideologies and nothing matters except their tribe. But then we moved into:

– The first age of Mesopotamic, Egyptian and Greek science and global religions (Islam and Christianity) in which the earth, that is all human beings, became the center of the Universe. And so it was understood that the planet Earth was the body of God, and mankind, its collective subconscious the only intelligent being of the Universe.

This age had two versions, as always a new paradigm of wider knowledge on the nature of the Universe is ‘polluted’ by the previous paradigm:

The Jewish-Christian anthropomorphic version and the Greek, objective, logic version.

In the Jewish->Christian->Islamic version superstitions still mix with the understanding of astronomy while the Greek version was void of superstition.

Because superstitions and myths require ‘inquisitions of thought’ that prevent further evolution; the Jewish-Christian version no longer evolved. On the contrary it has its periodic revivals, when as it is today new forms of censorship are established to prevent any criticism of ‘their beliefs’. So today we have political correctness, Jihad Islam, the industry of the holocaust, religious revivalism and all kind of rhetoric in favor of ‘beliefs’, including massive amounts of audiovisual emotional myths and money ab=used to expand Abrahamic religions that must be respected… to ensure a growing degradation of our knowledge of the Universe.

The next stage. Stience with cosmic bodies at its center.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.18.32

In the next stage Copernicus simplified the Ptolemaic system that had gone too far in his attempt to explain more facts beyond the simple sun-earth-moon relationships for which it was created.

For that reason it would be the Greek version the only one that would evolve further from the first Greek science with the Earth as center into the 2nd Greek and 1st western tradition with the sun as its center.

So from Aristarchus, which Copernicus read and annotated in his manuscript to Galileo, we evolved further our point of view, coming out of Planet Earth and making the sun the relative center of the Universe.

But men were still the only intelligent, worthy being of that Universe so Kepler wrote ‘God has waited 5500 (Biblical years) to find an intelligence like his’. Here the reader should observe how religious anthropomorphic beliefs still crept into this paradigm. And they still are part of modern science. So Newton thought God sent him comets as messages. Einstein said that if his theory was wrong ‘God had to correct the Universe, as it was so beautiful’ (here you can see Einstein’s ego-trips as individual and perhaps as a tribal son of God).

This is important to remember because the 5th Dimension’s paradigm has none of it.

And it is important for two reasons:

– On one side those first scientists established a theory of philosophy of science called ‘mechanism’ according to which the new machines they used to measure time -human clocks – and space – human telescopes became the model of the Universe. This was another form of anthropomorphism. Now human-made machines were God, the seer of time and space (definition of God by Saint Augustine). So Kepler said that ‘God was a clocker’ and Einstein said that ‘time is what a clock measures’.

But mechanism requires an external God to make the mechanism – machines are not self-generated. This Leibniz, the first true predecessor of the 5th dimension, noticed and laughed at Newton. Since when some errors of orbital motion were discovered -as the case of Mercury, Newton said it was Ok and God will repair them. And Leibniz said if God existed the Universe would be made perfect not with errors to correct latter.

While Landau laughed at Einstein’s definition of time as what a clock measures. So he said referring to the fact that in quantum physics you cannot measure the position of a particle in time and space with total precision (uncertainty principle) that he could according to Einstein, since he just measured the position and then looked at his watch.

So the reader should understand that previous egocentric, tribal, mechanist paradigms of man as a superior species are still common in science. The last case is the ideology of anthropomorphism called ‘anthropic principle’, which the Israeli scholar Mr. Bekenstein has imposed in pseudo-scientific media  according to which the Universe has the parameters it has so that man could be created.

It also creeps in places like CERN which worship a machine and expect that black holes, which in the Universe devour planets, stars and galaxies (quasars), will be harmless, for no proved reason except the human belief that we are too important to be erased by a tiny black hole…

– Which leads to the second problem of anthropomorphic beliefs: they do not work in praxis, as they confront the multiple points of view of the Universe each of them king of the hill, provoking constant conflict.

So the reader should not be surprised that the Germans, the most ego-centric people of the ancient world have entered unending wars with neighbors, massacring them and dying till becoming a tiny nation with a dying language.

– Now parallel to the Copernican revolution, there was the Buddhist and Darwinian revolution which made us just part of a web of life and so we were all similar, from the monkey to the worm to the rat to the human and all forms of life were worthy.  But of course the previous paradigms kept fighting the new paradigm and so in the American Biblical Belt Darwin is taboo and the very religious merchant of death, Mr. Nobel forbids to give Nobel prizes to evolutionists, as it considers it a non proved theory.

So let us resume this first age of knowledge:

We moved from ego to tribe to mankind and the Earth, to the Sun and life as centers of the Universe with periodic regression and the error of mechanism that worships the machines that measure time and space.

All those phases provoke conflict with other relative points of view, from individuals who are selfish – German paradigm – and kill each other as autist beings (America, where German influence is enormous), or tribes who kill each other in permanent conflict or mankind at large in permanent conflict with Gaia, the world of life, and now due to CERN’s madness with the top predator points of view of the Universe – the black holes for whom really galaxies are made. Since we observe black holes all over the galaxy commanding all their processes.

So knowledge is important not only per Sp but because a proper objective knowledge helps our survival as individuals, tribes and species. But all those who hold a subjective, lesser form of knowledge go down from reason to believe and use all kind of emotional myths and painful repressive inquisitions to maintain their truths as sacred. So they never evolve caught in their own web of self-serving lies, because as Nietzsche put it ‘the most difficult lies to deny are those we make about ourselves’.

Thus in any CHANGE OF PARADIGM:

– The point of view moves away from humans to enclose a wider part of the Universe. Thus, humans become ever more smaller as objective scientific knowledge advances… but

– Paradoxically the less important we feel and the more objective we are about our relative position in time and space, the better chances we have to survive, as we collaborate among humans with the power of social evolution, we respect the action-reaction processes of the Universe and all their points of view, not ab=using nature and other human beings, and so the paradox is that the less ego we have the better off we are.

3rd age: Space-time membranes as the center: Einstein’s 4th dimensional paradigm.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.45.10

Now to understand the next paradigm that precedes the new paradigm of the 5th dimension we must understand Einstein’s work with a critical view as we have done with all other points of view, being aware though that modern science believes in Einstein with the same zeal that they believed in Galileo, Copernicus, Yahweh and the tribe of the Goths before him.

And so as many religious or tribal people of German, Jewish, Christian or Muslim denominations will have already emotionally abandoned this page, many scientists will not even consider the 5th paradigm. Believers don’t reason. They don’t have patience. Their hypothalamus as science proves jumps out attention and memory when it enters in conflict with beliefs.

Still of course there are people who reason and so now we ask you to concentrate because here is where new knowledge must come first for you to understand a critical view of modern physics and their myths and beliefs.

Consider all what we have said. Basically we are moving our point of view from smaller to wider points of view, but when we have a point of view, that point of view is still, quiet, fixed in a center. And this relative ‘fixed’ point of view is important to understand Einstein’s theory.

Minds are still: Information can only be obtained with a fixed point of view.

Why we need a fixed point of view? Easy, because to measure and perceive we need to focus and be still to observe details. If you take a picture of a fast moving object is blurry. If you try to perceive the details of a fast moving object you will not be able to do it. This happens because knowledge gathers information and in-form-ation is ‘form’. But form is the opposite of motion. In the Universe all what you see around is form with motions.

This is very important to grasp. Look around. What you perceive is only 2 things often combined: Forms of information and energy motions. And actions of beings that combine motion and form.

And both things have opposite properties. The less motion the more form you observe, the higher motion the less form you observe. But knowledge is form, information. So to create knowledge you must depart from a relative, fixed point of view.

And so that is why you do not see the Earth moving but fixed. This is how nature has given you a capacity to observe with your mind reality as still, with form.

You need a pov to create a certain  scientific truth. But the larger the p.o.v. the bigger the truth. So the center has moved but each new age of science have kept a relative still point of view. You must create a still center to measure, because perception happens in stillness, as opposed to energy, which expresses itself with motion. Information focuses form and it must be still as Buddha was in the tree of knowledge.

So when Galileo came the earth moved and the new still p.o.v. Was the sun.

And when Darwin came the idea that man had not evolved, changed but had always been still, the same form created by God per in secula seculorum moved and now the new ‘still p.o.v.’ of biology where the immutable laws of evolution.

Now this allows you to understand the limits of Einstein’s paradigm. Since what Einstein did is to create a new still point of view that could not be changed. It was no longer the Earth, it was not the sun. It was not even man or evolution. What was the new still point of view from where Einstein would take his rods of measure?

LIGHT!

Einstein defined a Universe with a new point of view, the speed of light, which would remain constant from any perspective.

But why light?

Light seems an esoteric center. What makes light so essential to our view of the Universe, as to permit ‘measures’ that seem to be more accurate to our mind?

We must now give you the first upgrade on Einstein’s work by affirming that light IS the substance of the space we perceive with our eyes. And that is why from the perspective of our mind, which is what you are truly observing – not the full Universe and its exact objective measures, but the peculiar rod of your eyes and any other electronic mechanical device that absorbs light  – light IS space.

Indeed, you do not see reality in its totality, but light and so what you call space is light-space. And when you use an instrument, made to the image and likeness of our mind, you see light-space too.

But if you were a dog smelling the Universe, your mind mapping and distances would be different.

We are though an I=eye and for that reason our mathematical mind and light-space has 3 Euclidean perpendicular dimensions (the so called electric, magnetic and ray directions of light, which are perpendicular), which are the same dimensions of your perceived space.

Thus, what really Einstein did was to consider a larger point of view that the sun, the entire space of the Universe.

The center now had moved to every point of the Universe, and this allowed Einstein to say that all motions and points of view were relative, only space-light was a fixed background that didn’t change.

But he still established as a rod of measure of the other variable, time, the human clock; and so here, there were no advances on the objectivity of the point of view. ‘Time is what a clock measures’ he said.

Einstein did NOT change the point of view of the human clock, reason why Landau laughed at him saying that with his system he just had to ‘look at his watch to eliminate the uncertainty of time’ .

And so it IS in his understanding of time, where Einstein as most physicists before, had failed to expand the point of view. And it is where the 5th dimension will open up our objective view of the Universe, by defining in a more complex manner the meaning of time clock and consider the existence of many of them in the Universe.

IN essence, what we want now to consider is the isomorphism between the 2 main time clocks of the Universe, according to the relative scales of the 5th dimension: the time clocks of the quantum scales, ‘charges’, and the time clocks of the cosmological scales ‘masses’.

Between them, of course there is a 3rd type of time clocks ‘thermodynamic molecules’, whose temperature define the variations of speed of those time clocks, but being the thermodynamic ∆o scale, the human scale, we do have a lot of information about those time clocks, so physicists are sophisticated enough to understand them. They do NOT understand however masses and charges, reason why they have been for 100 years trying to unify them the wrong way – without understanding they are TIME CLOCKS of different scales, of different ‘curvature’ and speed, and so they need the metric of the 5th dimension to unify their parameters.

So simple and so mysterious for a century because we lacked the proper ‘heliocentric’ perspective – an essential dimension of reality. Then once we enter into that larger reality (which physical systems do but humans obviously can’t), we are in…

Now it is obvious that as we grow in size we curve from our perspective reality and so we get less information as things slow down and part of the information disappears from our perspective, and vice versa, as we look downwards the universe become hyperbolic and grows in detail of information and so we get different entropies up and down. This is shown in the symbol of the 5th dimension, ∆, which as you can see have two motions up and down one thinner and the other thicker, and this asymmetry is important to explain many things – genetic for example, going upwards perfect in information, body motions for example perfectly going downwards when the whole wants to move. Wholes are very good with motions smallish things with information. Havent you notice how energetic and powerful are big guys, how smart are small ones? (-;

THE INFORMATIVE QUANTA – H-PLANCKTONS.

Now we explained that the perception of a universe as euclidean or elliptic or hyperbolic depended on the long overdue respect we must give to the a priori parameter of all worlds: r²/L²=Tƒ/Sp. When this parameter tends to zero, we have an Euclidean geometry, above zero we have hyperbolic and below zero we have elliptic.

The parameter which defines the mathematics in which we live is so essential that it will come constantly. For example, we can consider that systems exist at one side of the parameter, at the side of c speed as a limit – in our euclidean world – or over c speed (in the elliptic gravitational world) at the side of T=0k as the limit of the thermodynamic plane, etc.

So we need now to complete the definition of our world, to deal with the nature of our square ‘radius’ parameter of information. What is the minimal quanta of information of our electronic eyes, that feed on h-quanta of light energy, well, we just said it, the h-quanta which measures in the minimal amount known, the spin of a particle, which is rather obviously the minimal unit of its angular momentum, of its informative perception.

And for that reason as h/c is truly a minimal amount our relative 0, we live in that Euclidean world.

The first and most important of T.Œ’s 5 actions of all systems that want to survive, is ‘perception of information’ How do particles perceive?

Of all those levels and actions the one physicists understand worst and less is the action of informative perception of smaller particles, called SPIN, which is the absolute minimal unit of reality we measure after deforming it fully (quantum uncertainty), a quantity called angular momentum, h/4 pi, which is as a ‘form of information’, ‘space-form’ NOT motion.

And since h is in the above equation, E=ƒh, a whole, hence a sphere (whatever it has inside), the ‘essential topology of all wholes’ by definition enclosed disks-sphere (in ¬ Æ topology a disk is a 1-sphere, a sphere, a 2-sphere, a sphere in motion a 3-sphere, which as motion is a dimension seen in motion, can be of different varieties, etc.), a spin is ‘logically’ is a n-sphere divided by 4 π:Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 14.10.41

Now the graph gives us possible choices, as we depart from a ‘whole’ of a light beam, which could be a cylindrical cut, as in some lineal worms, or a ball. As 4π comes in the ball, we have 2 choices or the surface of the ball, or the solid sphere but NOT all, only a section, called a ‘solid angle’. This gives us a first duality between ‘human measure ‘and ‘true property’. The true property is the solid angle from the surface to the center, r3/3, the human measure is the external surface, r2/2.

As all space-time organisms have truly 2 components, the ‘internal’ open ball topology (meaning the ball without the surface membrane and the center of the point) or ‘present-evident, wave-like ST form’, and then the membrane and o-point in the center, or Sp x Tƒ, ‘past x Future’ particle (limbs-external sensorial membrane and central mind) together:Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 08.27.39

Why we know spin is a solid angle of information? Because if it were a motion, as Pauli, the guy who is credited with its discovery, put it to his real discoverer, as speed it will be 137 times faster than light!: hc2/e2=137 (inverse fine constant). This in 5D physics is NOT a problem, c-speed is Einstein’s postulate to adapt the Universe to the human perception of it – our rod of measure, as electronic minds. But here Pauli does have a point. A Spin does NOT rotate, as you do NOT rotate when looking outside, but is a ‘wedge’ into the sphere, through which information enters.

We see the surface of it and so it seems a momentum, the being sees the solid angle of it and so it is an intensity. Because the being is down there into the zero-point soul of the particle, mind of mathematical perception, it does open and close the sphere to ‘look’ through the windows of the membrane. In the simplest form, it is a pi cycle of 1-sphere, which is made of 3 closing diameters, which leave π=3, 0.14 d apertures, or 0.14/π=5% of light and 95% of dark matter/energy, the proportions light space-time beings DO NOT see of the Universe.

So now in the ‘dialectic’ Socratic method (remember my culture) I use to find things, I deny myself. What if I consider NOT a solid angle, BUT a spin, which IS a slice ‘SEEN’ through the 1/3rd ‘D’ apertures between the diameters of the pi-1-sphere (cycle) or the ‘cuts on the 2-sphere’. We realize this ‘will be a slice’ with the exact parameters of angular momentum, and there will be 3 holes, hence only 3 spin angles, and they will be further on quantized – jumping from part of part of the whole:

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 23.47.05

In the graph the proper description of Angular Momentum as a plane of Information, the minimal unit of perception of our Universe, proper of Relativity is more clear than the classic dynamic Time description as r x mv – both have their different uses/perspectives. H is the rod of informative measure of the Human electronic eye-mind, so small compared to c, the human rod measure of light space that the constant of geometry, r²/L² of Lobachevsky’s pan geometry becomes close to zero, creating our perceived Euclidean space, deformed to a hyperbolic geometry for smaller beings (Special Relativity, quantum physics) and to an elliptic geometry for larger gravitational scales (General Relativity)

Now, this is the modern ‘Hilbertian-Einsteinian’ description of angular momentum, just what we said it is, P, is the ‘cut’ on the n-sphere, x the radius, equivalent to P in ‘distance-motion’, and its product an amount mrv which is the spin. You can think of it as an information bit or an energy bite (space or moving perception) of the being.

Now those are the spins, quantized, and you can see there are 2 or 3 ‘cuts’ to perceive, with different orientations, and DO NOT come in bigger numbers. The maximal thing is this work of art, called ‘female and male spins’.

We won’t enter on this (-; just to mention the bidimensional nature of those spins (left graph) in the left side, which ARE the quanta of all information humans, electronic eye-beings, perceive about the world. And the obvious capacity to process and orientate they give as the ‘eyes’ of the atom, to each particle.

Moreover, they get ordered, orientated by the external magnetic field, the larger time-enclosure that orders from ∆, the ∆-1 quantum field. Now ask a physicist what is a spin, he will put a lot of formulae of abstract maths, which it will take you half a year to memorize, without understanding. Why? The idea that particles perceive is out of the ‘picture’.

Now the magnetic field, they like, as all heads turn to her the speaker in human groups, all atoms spin in tune, and we use it to control them, as speakers use the word nation and god. Same law of mass-control. I call it lanwave. A Wave ordered by a language of energy and information they speak. The magnetic field is the language of space that transcends atomic parts into the next scale; forming them; the electric field is the time force that put them in motion. That is how we transcend from quantum to our scale. The best at the job of ‘feeling’ magnetic lanwaves is the iron, and it becomes the top guy of the next scale. It forms perfect organized masses.

Once we are here, those motions are ‘activated’ by temperature, vibrational clocks of our molecules.

Temperature is the ‘electric field’ that moves us in the ∆-scale. What is the ‘spin’ for Molecules?. They use van der waals forces and ‘angles’, giving by slave atoms.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 21.22.44And the boss of those perceptive ones in our body is the nitrogen. It has 3 H systems to perceive.

Here you have an amino acid working his life around, with its oxygen legs kicking in and out water, its carbon body with lateral arms of many kinds and its nitrogen head.

You are made of a lot of those.

 I-LOGIC GEOMETRY. THE 5 ¬Æ POSTULATES.

Euclidean Geometry vs. Non-Euclidean, fractal points.

Space is in mathematics represented by geometry, which has 3 ages of evolution:

  • Pure bidimensional Space: Euclidean Geometry, only on the plane
  • SPACE-time: Analytic geometry mixed with algebra
  • 5D: Fractal spaces: Non-Euclidean Geometry.

Those are the 3 ages of Geometry studied in these posts, which represents an obvious ever closer ‘homeomorphism’ (correspondence) between the language and reality

(We won’t use many technical mathematical words of the 3rd age of formal mathematics, with the exception of topology, as the essential science of space and the basic concepts of time logic and 5D analysis.

Since it is a RULE of 5D sciences to ‘simplify’ jargons while making more ‘complex’, similar to 5D reality the laws of sciences – a process which all 3rd informative ages of systems subverts by making jargons more complex, at the same time that the science departs from reality, becoming a metalanguage. This is a process all too obvious in cosmological physics, which has blown up the ‘local’ models of entropy (thermodynamics) and Relativity (galactic light space-time) to become the ‘absolute new time arrow’ and absolute total space of all the scales of the Universe. LOL – how humans always blow up their finitesimal ego to the infinite – the harder they fall.

Here the trick is, due to the cumbersome mathematical crunching of Relativity (a conceptual simple theory but difficult to solve with non-lineal differential equations), and the complex maths of quantum physics (whose concepts are not so complex but appear so, due to the null understanding or rather anthropomorphic denial of its organic and logic properties), is to substitute all serious scientific, strict conceptual analysis of its truth, by mathematical jargons and computerised calculus that allow the scholar to pump up their pride, with jargons.

As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’. So for example, the collapse of a wave into a particle, is exactly the same process that collapses a school of fishes when a huge predator comes, but this implies to accept that particles do gauge information and do follow a survival program, and do evolve socially. And this never will be accepted by anthropomorphic humans. So we do have all kind of absurd Copenhagen interpretations of the particle-wave duality.

In mathematics, the age of set theory and the Hilbert formalism, followed by the idealist ‘gothic’ german school, with its proverbial incapacity to ‘see reality’ (treated in the cultural parts of this blog), meant the abandon of the true concepts, points and numbers; hence the HALTING on the evolution of the concept of a point with parts, and the curved parallels of energy and information that cross them (1st and 2nd Non-Euclidean postulates), truncating the evolution of the discipline after the great insights of Lobachevski and Riemann.

And as everything else in the Universe, it represents the 3 dynamic ages of evolution of systems, for a pure ‘spatial state’ in this case (E-geometry) to a balanced analysis of both T and S together (analytic geometry which should properly be called geometric algebra), and finally to a full informative form with less relationship with reality, and old metalanguage. This is the phase of Non-Euclidean Geometry.

After that there are always two choices for a system, ±n, that is:

-I: to die away in the baroque form, and become a non growing excessively formal state of mathematics, which is what mathematics has become since set theory took over. Or:

+n: to evolve further into a whole by the proper fusion of all the other ages into a more complex fusion form. This final social evolution is I-logic geometry, the geometry of networks of non-euclidean fractal points across multiple planes of the 5th dimension.

In its origin, Mathematics, as a language that represented reality with simplified symbols, only numbers and points with no parts, had a limited capacity to carry information. Its symbols, geometric points and numbers simplified and integrated the fractal, discontinuous reality into a single space-time continuum, the Cartesian Space/Time graph, made of points without breath. However the points of a Cartesian plane or the numbers of an equation are only a linguistic representation of a complex Universe made of discontinuous points with an ‘internal content of space-time’. In the real world, we are all pieces made of fractal cellular points that occupy spaces, move and last a certain time. When we translate those space-time systems into Euclidean, abstract, mathematical ‘numbers’, we make them mere points of geometry void of all content.

But when we look in detail at the real beings of the Universe, all points/number have inner energetic and informative volume, as the fractal geometry of the Universe suddenly increases the detail of the cell, atom or far away star into a complex complementary entity.

So we will propose a new Geometrical Unit – the fractal, Non-Euclidean point with space-time parts, which Einstein partially used to describe gravitational space-time. Yet Einstein missed the ‘fractal interpretation’ of Non-Euclidean geometry we shall bring here, as Fractal structures extending in several planes of space-time were unknown till the 1970s. So Einstein did not interpret those points, which had volume, because infinite parallels of ‘forces of Entropy and information’ could cross them, as points, which when enlarged could fit those parallels, but as points in which parallels ‘curved’ converging into the point. This however is not meaningful, because if such is the case parallels which are by definition ‘straight lines’, stop being parallels.

Einstein proved using Non-Euclidean points to explain the structure of space-time its fractal nature: points seem not to have breath and fit only a parallel, but when we enlarge the point, we see it is in fact self-similar to much bigger points, as when we enlarge a fractal we see in fact self-similar structures to the macro-structures we see with the naked eye. That is in essence the meaning of Fractal Non-Euclidean geometry: a geometry of multiple ‘membranes of space-time’ that grow in size, detail and content when we come closer to them, becoming ‘Non-Euclidean, fractal points’ with breath and a content of Entropy and information that defines them.

Thus to fully represent the Universe of the 5th dimension, of multiple vital spaces and cyclical times, we need to evolve our understanding of mathematics, away from the straight-jacket of excessive formalism and a snobbish pretention of absolute truth.

Instead we must return to its beginnings, following the dictum of Einstein: ‘Leibniz is right but if so we must rebuild Western sciences from its foundations’.

But before we study the first age of mathematics, obviously we must do so with the reference of the higher learning of 5D fractal Non-AE points. So we must do a general introduction to the true structure of mathematical systems. As this will allow us to make in-depth comments as we survive the discoveries of the 3 ages of mathematics, and corrections, which should make sense of that mankind has discovered till this age.

We shall thus introduce the theoretical minimum of the 5 non I-logic postulates that structure the Universe of points-numbers. And then start thought he age of ‘Greek mathematics’ (it is the age dominant in space-plane geometry), the II Age of European Mathematics (Dominant in Analysis and mathematical physics, which is as always in all systems the classic most important age), the 3rd age of old-formal mathematics ( with its baroque, unneeded formalisms of set and categories) and its new toppings of topology, Non-E first insights and fractals and functionals (with wide projections unlike sets – have you seen a set of all sets around nature of lately (-:, in biology, geology, physics and quantum theory).

We won’t for mere humanism and self-respect deal with a part I practiced when young, I.A. information algorithms and Boolean algebras (digital thought), that is the birth of Artificial intelligence.

 

The Euclidean Mind of light-space. Kant.

Newton indeed believe mainly in 2 things: Yahweh and absolute lineal time and space, a background abstract reference set up by God, who talked to him with comets.

So he studied the Cartesian graph, when reading ‘La geometrie’ which he acknowledged was the beginning of his interest for science.

But for him the graph and its lineal coordinates were not merely the human mind-world, but the graph that represented ALL of reality, which he blew to cosmic proportions and affirmed to be the graph of the absolute Universe and its space-time. This is NOT truth, and we will bring here a simple proof, derived from Kant’s realization that we ‘see light space-time’, because the ‘human mind is Euclidean’, which latter influenced the perception of painters, creating impressionist, as they realized also that we do NOT paint reality but light, THE RELATIVE SPACE-TIME our electronic eyes measure:

A light quantum has the 3 perpendicular dimensions of the informative electric field, the magnetic entropic field and the lineal c-speed that reproduces the wave. And those are the 3 exact perpendicular dimensions of our perceived space, as our eyes are electronic and feed on the information of light – hence also establish light as its fixed rod of measure or constant space, (relativity) but the universe has multiple world-views, and some are non-Euclidean (gravitational worldwide) some are atomic (smelling worldview) etc. Human eyes and mechanical eyes though are electronic, and their bits of information visual, hence Euclidean:gravitationalwavesbestintermediatespace_image002

In the graph the Euclidean world is caused by the 3 perpendicular arrows of light space-time to which we add the social colors. 2 more elements are needed to define our human space-time, first the organic relationships between our electronic eyes that feed on light, and the properties of information – as information is perceived in stillness, in an stop and go motion, similar to that of a film – so electrons go and move as waves, stop and feed and perceive light as particles, entangling its distances with other electrons in ‘fixed’ distances. Hence c-speed is always constant, our rod of space, as relativity proves, without giving the proper i-logic explanation.

It is indeed essential for the reader to understand that linguistic mappings, stifle and deform the objective similarity of all beings.

So all kind of distorted images that carry a certain truth are possible, and relatively correct, but ONLY an objective analysis from the widest possible perspective, will make sense of all of them.

This widest Theory Of Everything, naturally can only be proposed by a Philosopher of Science, whose task is precisely to understand all the varieties of ‘formal motions’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ in space and time, measured by the infinite frames of reference of the Universe.

While each science and scientist will study a particular form and type of species in its detail, with more or less deformation according to the linguistic models it proposes, its specific ‘ego-centered paradox’ and the ‘worldly profession’, it engages with. Which of course the Philosopher of Science must also explain, to the chagrin of the different ‘Religions’, ‘Cultures’ and ‘Minervas of the North’, and the sure solitude that will engulf his work.

So how can we differentiate subjective truths, and biases? To that aim the philosopher of science has created the ‘Scientific method’, which the likes of Aristotle and Descartes established, and the likes of Galileo and Newton usurped and deformed.

But as we said all relative truths carry certain information, which is valid to create a mapping of reality and that is why subjective versions of reality do work and remain standing. Indeed, Ptolemy could perfectly establish the orbits of planets with the Earth at its center, just adding epicycles. But it was a very complicated motions. Thus Science considers the fundamental ‘tool’ to distinguish a higher objective truth from a subjective one, called Ockham’s razor: the simplest theory of reality which can explain the maximal number of facts is a more objective truth.

This was the merit of Descartes, the true founder of modern science, which we have upgraded to our ternary analysis of all systems of the Universe, in what we shall call, T.Œ, the Theory of the Organic Everything, as all those ternary systems made of cyclical times, lineal spaces and self-centered territorial points of view that organize them, will show clear ‘organic patterns in its form and actions.

Let us then, keep narrating, the next installment of the history of western thought, and its duality between the Philosophers of science, who know better vs. the Physicists, who have more power – explain in modern terms the findings of Descartes, with the help of the new mathematical tools of topology and fractal geometry those discoveries, in more detail.

The human point of view: I = Eye + Wor(l)d

electronic_mind_clip_image002That all what you see is a construction of the mind is the main tenant of philosophy of knowledge, from Plato’s world of ideas to Descartes’ devil putting reality inside us, from Schopenhauer’s world ‘in the eye’ to Schrodinger’s cat.

We are an I=Eye+Wor(l)d, a mind of 2 languages, as the other languages of sensorial experience, touch, smell and taste are irrelevant. We can exist without them. We see and verbalize reality, converting ‘whatever is beyond’ in geometrical images with the eye and temporal chains with verbs of past, present and future.

At present, the I=Eye has been highly developed in science due to instruments, mechanisms made of metal, a better atom than our paltry 1-6-7-8, HCNO structures. So we have pictures of all kind of scales of reality, from the infinitesimal atom to the galaxy. Beyond those scales things become blurred. Yet curiously enough the parameters of atoms and galaxies in terms of energy and information are self-similar. Is this because each atom is a galaxy of a nano-universe, or because our Mind, who measures, gets an aberration of distance parallel in atoms and galaxies?

That the mind’s scalar and continuous distance from those 2 realities, might cause our perception to equalize forms of atoms and galaxies is a way of thought proper of our awareness that all what we see is information already ‘cooked’ by the mind, ‘deformed’ and ‘transmuted’ by the Maya of the senses.

We are not seeing the real Universe. We are a geometrical and verbal mind, which applies geometric and causal categories to interpret reality. And so all what we can talk is about the 3 dimensions of our spatial perception and the 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future, explained by our verbs. Hence, the importance of evolving our mind languages to have a better mirror in the smaller scale of the brain, reflecting the entire Universe. But the linguistic Maya, the ‘a priori’ mind who perceives, the I=eye+wor(l)d will always be limiting our truths.

The 3 dimensions of space perceived mathematically and the 3 ages of time perceived verbally are thus the last components of reality, which reflect the paths and arrows of time deployed by each species of each scale:

– In time, we observe constantly forms being born, going through an energetic big-bang, growth, maturity and then a still, solid warped stage before death.

– In space, we see 3 topological regions that correspond to energetic, reproductive and informative functions.

The total Universe is the only entity that stores all the information about itself. We exist as a dialog between the image of the Universe of our eye and the verbal information we extract from it, our I.

Humanity lives in a light-space world which scientists measure with machines and artists with the linguistic mapping of our senses, created with our inner languages.

Scientists in that sense are creating a new Eye<=>Mind, the mind of machines that also measure space and time:

Mechanical Eye <=> Digital Thought.

Indeed, scientists are not discovering the absolute truth of reality but creating a more complex Linguistic World, a world of digital thoughts and images that future perceptive machines will use to control reality. And because that world of mathematical and instrumental perception has more information than the human I< =>Wor(l)d, on the long term A.I. robots might extinguish us, as superior minds/bodies. Of course, scientists do not understand this because they think the machine is an extension of their ego.

Ultimately we exist within our mind and so our truth is a subjective, human truth developed with our languages. We do not see the external world of quantum fluctuations but what our light/electronic mind creates, extracting only a part of the total reality to map visually the Universe, reduced to a light-space world. Our ego, our consciousness is and eye <=> Wor(l)d, a fractal space/time dialog between our informative mind, the wor(l)d and our energetic space, the eye:

‘I think and see therefore I exi=st’

So we are indeed a fractal equation/function of existence:

The Human Mind:  Sp (Eye) <=> Tƒ (Wor(l)d).

Minds are focused, ‘Aristotelian Gods’, defined in his metaphysics as unmoved, intelligent brains around which energy flows and ‘bodies’ turn, as they move the mind. Stillness is indeed the nature of mind perception. Even if reality is a moving fractal soup, our eye is not out of focus because its virtual images are still, like the pictures of a film that stops in front of the camera. Both images, in the eye and the camera, only move and change when we blink our eyes or the camera closes its window, stopping our perception.

Thus, perception is also a stop and go process that focuses a still image through the senses and then processes that information into a thought, while the eye-senses are blinking, closed and the reproductive body moves slightly the eye-mind. In the human case that stop and go, perceive and move rhythm lasts a second, our ‘dharma’ of relative present-existence in which we create a still, simultaneous mental image of the Universe. Each second our fractal, informative mind closes a mental, cyclical act of perception:

Cycles of temporal energy=>sensorial in-forma-tion =>Brain-clock of time.

Truth is given by the languages of the mind. A truth is a mental/linguistic mirror of information within the mind that reflects the external universe.

Thus, unlike the naïve realism sponsored by physicists, a fundamental thesis of Systems sciences is to consider there is much more information in the Universe than the one we can perceive. Since each mind needs to select its information. Because each mind has a limited quantity of vital space, it can store only a limited quantity of linguistic ‘information’ about the cycles performed by other entities in the Universe, and so it selects only those pieces of energy and information that give an accurate depiction of the world in which the entity finds its energy and information and other self-similar species to reproduce and evolve socially. The rest of the Universe thus becomes a relative dark space.

Since the Universe is a game of entities of energy and information, relative ‘points of view’ that search for more energy and information to reproduce themselves and survive as self-similar ‘logic forms’, that game of survival has imposed limits to the information we perceive, maximizing information that ensures the reproductive and social games, the ultimate will of the Universe that ensures the ‘durability’ of each point of view, which will only exist beyond its ‘caducity date’, if it is able to repeat its energy and information into a self-similar being that continues the game of existence, once the original form is broken.

The 5th postulate combined with the analysis of the internal parts of a point and the trajectories of the cycles that the flows of energy and information between points follow, defines not only philosophical questions like perception and the nature of fractal information, but the fundamental causal arrow of time of the Universe: Energy->Information.

Since the flows of forces absorbed by the point create the ‘reality’ we see by constructing an image which is not there – the world as an ‘idea’ (Schopenhauer); that is the world-mind, the I=Eye+ wor(l)d we perceive, different from that of other species that perceive with other forces and minds.

Recap: The human mind, and probably all other minds/systems of information use 2 basic language of perception, a geometrical language able to perceive space and a logic language, able to perceive time. Humans perceive space with visual images and time with logic words. We are an I=eye+wor(l)d. Yet other species should use other versions of those 2 geometric/spatial and logic /temporal languages.

For example, the complexity of visual languages ranges from a simple light/dark, on/off switch in simple particles to the simple geometrical motions of particles, to the richness of visual perception in animal eyes. While the complexity of Logic chains of events ranges from simple Aristotelian chains, A->B, which define the simplest arrows of Time (feeding, where A is energy that becomes B, the food of the predator), performed by all entities, to complex social networks in which causality is multiple, as each informative ‘neuron’ of the network relates through its axons to all the other cells of the informative system.

761

In the graph an amino acid fish in which the elements of information, iteration and entry motion are performed by N, C and O molecules. They will form the triad of all biological ternary organisms at the bio-molecular level.

 

III. THE TOPOLOGY OF THE MIND: PANGEOMETRY

BEST 3 VARIATIONS

BIOLOGY_image002

In the graph, is  the informative center and it is a spherical topology. It is still bidimensional because the mind itself, the zero-point has externally zero dimensions. So only the external membrane is dimensional.

From the perspective of the relative flows of time from past to future, the Mind is the first of those and the last of them, the alpha and omega the beginning and end of time, where information collapses from the external sensorial membrane (first graph) to the future zero point last graph, if we were to use cones of world cycles.

We explained in the simplified lecture that introduced multiple space-time theory that the Universe is a holography of an informative bidimensional field and an energetic bidimensional field that created the 4 dimensions of reality.

This is the case of the simplest forms like light, which is merely a membrane with two perpendicular energetic and informative fields.

But complex ‘closed topological balls’ with 3 regions, an informative center joined to an informative spherical membrane and a Klein body of reproductive cycles between them, with attached toroid limbs, is better described as a series of bidimensional layers in motion which add the time-motion dimension and the 3rd dimension by accumulation of layers.

In those ‘complete’ st-points the central discontinuous zone of a fractal point is an informative region, which uses the sensorial input of the informative membrane  to create a mapping of itself (homunculus) and the world (imprinted in the senses of the external membrane).

In metaphysics, which searches for the logic and geometric laws, derived from the 5 Non-Euclidean definitions, from where the arrows and wills of the organic Universe are deduced; a mind is understood as a fractal image, reflection of an internal body and an external Universe, which connects both regions of the st-point.

What mathematicians did was rather a runaway path. Because once geometers realized that multiple lines can cross a point, they could not use any longer the Euclidean definitions.

Now points, lines, planes and equality could no longer hold under the definitions of Euclid (points, lines and planes with no breadth), they remained undefined, when Hilbert, the father of modern mathematics affirmed ‘I imagine lines, points, planes…’.

Instead the proper solution was to redefine them in terms of their ‘inner parts’ as fractal points that grew in size when we observed them with a more detailed ‘hyperbolic geometrical view’, as that unveiled by non-E mathematics.

So T.œ redefines points, planes and line-waves and their relative laws of equality (also called congruence) and continuity (which no longer holds), to refound mathematics on the basis of a far more realist view of its laws as ‘experimental laws’ that reflect the geometry of the 5th dimension and the complex casualty of a world with multiple time motions. And consider that those points with volume form social ‘numbers’, whose laws are therefore related to the laws of the 5th dimension that brings parts into social wholes.

 

The two language of the mind, its body and informative languages.

In a zero-point the membrane is the first mapping of the Universe, in its highest, ⊕-informative faster, language, and the intermediate body, which reproduces and maintains the system is mapped out, albeit in the lower ∑-language of the system.

A mind will constantly check both, the membrane and its sensorial image to which it is connected through a nervous/informative system and the inner body, to which is connected through a reproductive/energetic system.

So a human brain is connected to the inner world through the blood system and the external world through the membrane senses. It has two images of reality and it combines them both, word feelings and eye-images, to act with 2 purposes: to maximize the informative perception of the external world and the inner, reproductive and energetic feelings and pleasures of the Internal world.

This complex explanation of the human being, explored in more detail in other works, is reduced to a minimal skeleton, maintaining the scheme of wills and purposes, when we study the simplest forms of the Universe. And it is the origin of the Maldacena Conjecture A,12 (a black hole, informative center of the galaxy has in 5 dimensions the same structure than a galactic mapping in 4 dimensions.)

Recap. The dimensions of the  informative center are the sum of the dimensions and information stored in the cycles of the reproductive body and the energetic membranes, whose senses map out the external Universe.

 II.ACTIONS

The generator equation of space-time: 9+@ dimensionality.

On the other hand, to be able to connect specific equations of detailed metric analysis with the general equation of the 4 arrows of time we have to descend into an exhaustive detailed analysis of those arrows, dividing them in sub-arrows specific of each discipline and defining those arrows with concrete operations used in metric spaces.

Moreover when we observe things in more detail, we must break reality in multiple subcomponents that assembly wholes in parts, reality become more complex. And this again seems counter-intuitive. Because as set theory shows the whole is simpler than its detailed parts. So if we follow the integrative path from parts into wholes thing simpler and at the end we end with 2 simple concepts, the physical Universal body and its Mind god.

This in the rest of this introduction to multiple space-times, after making a very brief, simplified account of it all in the previous pages, we are going to try a tour de force: to resume it all, which will be latter developed in more extensive lessons, departing from the simplest parts into the whole, by showing you all the arrows of time and topologies of space from the simplest events and geometries to the more complex, from the primordial parts or ‘simplex arrows’ of space-time, into the organisms of reality or ‘complex arrows, and finally into the absolute whole Universal body and mental God, or ‘universal, transcendental arrows of time’.

Those 3 scales, from the simplest actions of abstract spacetime into the complex organisms of vital spacetime till reaching the absolute whole, are the 3 stairs we need to make sense of all. In each of those stairs we shall define 3 arrows of space-time for a total of 9 dimensions and that is all you need to create the Universe: the simplex, complex and transcendental arrows/ cycles/dimensions of all realities.

This is possible to do when we realize that the complex arrows of reproduction and social evolution manifest themselves differently in physical, biological and sociological entities, ‘decoupling’ themselves in ternary events, ‘actions’ that reproduce waves in physical space, ‘palingenetic offspring’ that reproduce biological species and so on. So in the more complex division of the arrows of time, we talk of 3 x 3 cycles/dimensions of space-time, which we group in 3 types:

Physical, spatial arrows:

Physical entities are complementary entities, which:

– I: In its particle state gauge information.

-E: In its wave state feed on energy.

-exi: And together reproduce actions, either by emitting a self-similar fractal part of energy and information, called an ‘action’, used to communicate with other entities (a Universal constant, such as h) or by moving towards a position the particle has gauged. And so we define 3 physical arrows or dimensions of space: gauging information, i; feeding on energy, e, and reproducing actions by combining them, exi. We call them also dimensions of space, because the light-space in which we exist has 3 Euclidean coordinates that correspond to the informative, electric field, the energetic, magnetic field and its product, the reproductive speed of light.

And it is a well-known fact of science (Maxwell equations) that the speed of light can be found by multiplying the magnetic and electric constants of light, thus showing that indeed, the algebraic operandi x connects the why of the simple arrows of space-time in physical entities with the specific equations found in the metric paradigm.

Thus one of the most fascinating facts of the Universe is the fact that departing from 2 simple entities, lineal energies and cyclical informations, which create spatial planes and clocks of time, we can explain it all by combinations, repetitions and transformations of those elements. A further precision though is needed on the difference between classic operandi such as equality and the new, evolved, dynamic operandi of self-similarity proper of multiple space-times in constant transformation; since most people tend to call each thing by a single name and see things in a static manner. So the paradoxical transformations of a reality, which suddenly become its opposite, break their ‘Aristotelian mind’ and one-dimensional perception of space and time.

Consider the famous equation, E=Mc2, which in the so-called Planck notation, where light speed is the unit, writes E=M, and since a mass is an attractive whirl of space-time with a cyclical form, it can be defined in terms of time clocks, or in terms of information, as the fastest it turns, the more informative frequency it has, and the more it attracts, as all whirls and hurricanes do. So, we can write it E=M(Ti) or simply E=Ti.

This is meaningless because Energy is not mass or information but exactly its opposite. Lineal energy though can curl and create mass, especially when it goes at c-speed, its limit of lineal motion and so it deflects the remaining energy into a cyclical form of mass. And vice versa, a mass can uncoil and create energy. So energy can be transformed back and forth into mass and the proper way to write this equation is EóM(Ti). And yet our mind prefers the concept of equality. And physicists will tell you that energy and mass are equal. The proper word though is ‘self-similar’ – a word used in fractal geometry, which topologists that observe self-similar beings understand much better. Thus the 4th paradigm is a change of ‘chip’, of state of mind, of the way we think, which makes it so difficult to penetrate, because the human mind is a simpler structure of thought, more accustomed to fix forms into visual concepts that see the complex, fractal, transformative reality.

Social, organic, temporal arrows

Se<=>(∏=S2)i; ∫∂: Most systems however create stronger actions by gathering multiple energetic cells into herds and waves, which create bodies and by gathering multiple informative cells, into complex social networks.

The difference between herds and networks is the degree of communication, since each element of a herd only relates to its neighbours and a network relates to all other elements of the network through a huge number of communicative flows.

This makes necessary to distinguish between the operandi of both types of social groups in a more precise manner that our simplified 4-dimensional equation where we used the sum and multiplicative operandi to represent a wave/herd and a network. Since we want to be able to relate those operandi to specific equations found in the use of metric spaces.

Thus, while we keep the sum symbol for herds, S, we use its square or more precisely its negative square or imaginary number, -S2 for information. Further on networks of information such as your neuron normally have a second scale of ‘sub-networks’, which are the flows of communications, or axons that join them to all other elements of the network, and it is easy to prove that if any point is connected to all the other points of the network, as well as to himself, the number of axons of the network will be the negative square of its sum, -S2. The a negative symbol also stresses that the properties of energy and information are inverted; and the organic, informative network absorbs its energy from the body network, subtracting from the total force of the body the energy it requires, as the brain does, without giving back anything but informative orders. Thus informative networks are represented by imaginary numbers, in the complex plane, as it happens with fractal generators that have a real and imaginary term or in the representation of the phase wave of electrons, which have a real number that represents its energy and an informative value represented with imaginary numbers. The same concept applies to the understanding of the equations of special relativity in which the parameter of temporal information is multiplied by a negative square, as light-space contracts the gravitational space in which it draw its forms. Thus again, a more precise algebra of the cycles of energy and information allow us to connect the why of multiple space-time cycles with its detailed description and equations in metric space.

A more sophisticated operandi to study networks is the duality between integration and disintegration (derivative symbol) ∫∂. Let us consider for example, the simplest duality: ∂∑2=2∑.

If we consider a complex system with an informative head, a network of neurons, ∏=∑2 in charge of the limbs and body cells, which tend to be in equilibrium (Re=E), in as much as the energetic system provides the elements to the reproductive system or moves it (being the informative system much smaller in space), then the derivative of ∑2=2∑ means the network will codify with its instructions both the body and the limbs. If the system was simpler – an energetic/information systems, then ∑2(neurons)=∑. This in Theory of Information gives birth to a key law: ‘the number of informative instructions needed to integrate the parts of a system into a whole is the square number of its parts’, with wide applications that range from epigenetics to industrial design.

Thus again we can see how the more general laws of the 4th topological paradigm, when studied in detail give birth to the specific laws of the 3rd, metric paradigm.

Finally both come together into complementary organisms, and combine their body and brain structures to reproduce themselves. And so there are 3 organic arrows: the creation of energetic waves, S; the creation of informative networks, and its combination in reproductive events or organisms, <=>. Where <=> must be substituted by different algebraic operandi depending on what kind of system we describe. So in the example of a phase space of an electron will be a sum, +, but in a Darwinian process in which an informative cellular system or herd of top predators feeds on a field of energy or prey, it could be a division, as the ‘food pie’ is divided into the members of the herd and so on. We thus keep as in the case of topological spaces, a minimal degree of flexibility to be able to accommodate the multiple cases in which an informative network and an energetic herd or reproductive body enter into an act of communication.

Since the processes of organic evolution – the formation of herds and networks and its reproduction – contracts space, tying together individuals into groups, and requires a long period of time, those 3 arrows that need languages of informative communication can be considered to be dominant in time. As indeed, ‘time curves space’, and ‘time evolves the morphology, the form of beings’ (Einstein, Darwin).

The fractal arrows of multiple-space times

Finally we can talk of the fractal, transcendental arrows of multiple space-times, which were unknown in the age prior to the scientific revolution and have been looked at with wishful blindness by scientists, due to their dogma of a single clock-time and a single continuum space. They are however self-evident when you change your ‘frame of mind’ and see reality as it is, without those 2 dogmas of mechanist science:

The Universe is made of an infinity of those organisms, which generation after generation repeat themselves in time with small variations; or gather together into super-organisms, so particles evolved into atoms, which evolved into molecules that evolved into cells and planetoids that evolved into organisms and planets and galaxies and the Universe. And so we have 3 more arrows of time to complete the Universe: the generational arrows of species that go through a life-death cycle once and again between birth and extinction; the transcendental arrow that creates super-organisms with smaller super-organisms; and the ecosystemic arrow, which adds all the super-organisms and generations to create entire worlds and the Universe itself, which could be considered an ecosystem of complementary organisms of energy and information.

To represent them with algebraic symbols we shall call the previous equation, Se<=>-S2i, that defines a complementary entity of energy and information, spread in a single space-time ‘membrane’, plane or continuum as X. Then we define:

– ∫∂; e<=>I’; G; eg: Integration in time of multiple organisms.

The generational arrow/cycle of existence is relatively easy to represent, since all forms that live have a given order: they pass through an energetic youth, Max. E x Min. I, an age of maturity in which the being reproduces by mixing energy and information, e=I, and an informative age, when it warps the rest of its information, Min. E x Max. I. Then in the moment of death the system explodes back, devolving its information into energy. For that reason, we can also use the symbols of integration and its inverse derivative symbol of disintegration. Since ultimately an organism is ruled by the existence of an integrative network in control of its energetic limbs and/or body in complex systems. And for that reason we die when our informative, integrative network or ‘brain’ dies.

Yet those ages are dynamic and so we can use the <=> symbolism, to represent them all, whereas E< is the age of energy, <=> the balanced age and >I the age of information. And consider that the arrow of life is e >I (warping of energy into information) and the arrow of death is I<e, its reversal. Those simple equations in the static and dynamic form will allow us to explain many systems with inverted parameters, such as particles (life arrow of physical species) and antiparticles (death arrow). Thus again we can relate the 4th , why paradigm with specific entities of the metric paradigm. E=I, will become also the equation of beauty, as we perceive naturally beautiful a balanced form of energy and information and since the product exi or action is maximal when e=i, beauty becomes merely the expression of the most efficient, top predator form in which body and brain, energy and form are in balance. Thus again, we can obtain basic equations for fundamental processes of existence never before represented in algebraic form, such as life, death, beauty, top predator or existential force.

Finally we can define the generational arrow as the sum across time of all the generations between the birth of a species or living cycle and its extinction.  And so if we call G, the number of generations, any statistician knows since Fibonacci that the function eG is the most common number of reproductive generations that will exist after a number of G generations. And from that simple equation we connect with the extensive field of Volterra equations and other works of metric spaces regarding statistics of populations that will fine-tune the whys we have found in the 4th paradigm of multiple space-times.

According to each specific species and type of analysis we shall use any of those operandi after careful consideration.

– ∑, ∏: Integration in space of multiple organisms. The existential, ecosystemic or world arrow. Finally if we represent a complex ecosystem as a series of super-organisms and fractal parts integrated into a whole we reach the final goal of explaining it all either within a world or ecosystem or the Universe taken as such. What operandi shall we use for this final arrow? A careful analysis of the interactions happening in each ecosystem will give us a combination of all the previous arrows, as each ecosystem will have herds, networks of interrelated species, top predators with closer social relationships, several planes of existence, etc. So in this final scale of reality it would be preposterous to pretend we have a ‘metric equation’ able to represent all the ecosystems of reality and the absolute. But if we consider two separate terms, one for organisms and territories related as herds and one for those related as networks, we can write, with two ‘enlarged’ symbols of sum and multiplication, which turn out to be merely the more complex operations of derivation and integration:

∑(SE<=>-S2i ) <=> ∏( Se<=>-S2I)

On the other hand, for the mathematically inclined astro-physicist, we shall show in our work on physical spaces that the Universe and its main cellular galaxies, can be studied as an organism made of two networks, one of gravitational information (dark, gravitational energy and dark, quark matter) and herds of electromagnetic spaces (stars, electrons, etc. And so its equation would be self-similar to that of an organic system. On the other hand if we were to calculate the n=st number of total scales of reality we shall see that they seem to tend to infinity and so the equation of the Universe as a fractal organic system would be:

∑(SE<=>-S2i ) ó  ∏( Se<=>-S2I)

Thus we differentiate the body where E is dominant on i and the brain, where I is dominant on e.

– st=n; Xst=n: The fractal, transcendental arrow. Where n determines the complexity of the ecosystem across multiple fractal planes of exi=stence: If we consider that each of those super-organisms integrates a series of simpler planes of existence of lesser information, we can use a natural number st=n, to define each scale of reality. Where st=n will represent the number of planes of existence from the simplest organism, a particle or quanta, to the most complex the Universe; and Xn, the number of minimal cellular quanta of the system. Again this is easy to see if we consider the most common transcendental number, 10, where a tetrarkys of 10 elements give birth to a central point (9+1), which transcends as unit of the next scale. And so a Mongol army had 10 soldiers one of which was a sergeant and 10 sergeants were ruled by a captain and 10 captains by a general, so in 3 scales a general was commanding an army of 10n=3=1000 units.

In that regard the Existential function of the Universe follows also that decametric scale, where n=10, and the total reality, if those decametric scales between atoms and galaxies repeat themselves will have n=∞

Further on, if we integrate together all vital spaces on one side into an absolute space, S and all informative scales in time as an absolute Time, we can simplify the previous equation of st=∞ as a single ST world. So we write:

[∑(SE<=>-S2i ) <=> ∏( Se<=>-S2I)]=S<=>T

Where, the physical, spatial arrows are: e, the arrow of energy; i the arrow of information and x, the arrow of actions and motions.

The organic, temporal arrows are: S, the arrow of energetic waves; S2, the arrow of social networks and ó, the arrow of organisms and reproductions.

And the fractal, transcendental arrows are:

eg, the generational sum of all the cycles of life (e< or youth, = or maturity and >I or old age) of a species.

Xst=n, the product of all its planes of fractal existence.

Yet if we integrate all those life cycles across all its planes of space, we define an ecosystem of which the biggest one is the universe.

And so ∑, ∏, are the symbols of an ecosystem and the organisms of its world, which for n=∞ represents the Universe.

So the single Space continuum of classic science, S, is the sum of all the vital spaces of all its species and ecosystems.

Yet if we consider the evolution of those species across time, we observe that simpler forms evolve into more complex forms, from the initial particles to the complex structures of reality, with the passing of time. So T becomes the sum of all cycles of all systems, chained through organic synchronicities, to give us the absolute time of classic science.

Thus, we can perceive reality as a simplex space-time continuum, a whole, as classic science does, or in more detail as a dual system of energy and information, a 4-Dimensional reality that reproduces and evolves socially those bits and bites, or a series of organic parts and herds, which gather into ecosystems that evolve in bigger scales till reaching the size of a Universe.  In that sense, other simplified, valid expressions of the function of existence used in this book will be S<=>T, SxT (dual systems) or ∑Se<=>∏Ti or Exi=st (4-Dimensional ones.)

Needless to say the relativity of perception and measure makes each of us an Island-Universe, which can be described in maximal detail with the 9 arrows, as the scales of the Universe are relatively infinite and so even though normally we shall limit the study of a specific species to n±st=3 planes, we can obtain from most species multiple space-times. So a human could be studied till his atomic detail.

And so we have written departing from its minimal bits and the final generator equation of all realities. Since with those 3 x 3 arrows of spaces-times we can explain it all, the whole, ‘the thoughts of god’, the game of existence, and its ‘imprinted body’, the Universe, or each of its self-similar parts, its details.

Now the meaning of that equation must be clear: it generates all the other equations of the Universe. Consider for example how it implies several operations.

The operator <=> has in fact 2 forms: one dynamic as a flow, < = > and one static as a knot: X. The first one fusions the 3 ages of growth, balance and diminution <, =, >. It means that generation has 3 ages, < = >, and two operations, =, parallelism, when the exchange or transformation is balanced or X, perpendicularity, when the top predator element of the exchanges absorbs all the energy from the other system. Thus we can consider instead of a simple equality, a complex transformation with several phases. If we call each side of the equation E and I, then:

E=I;    E<I;      I<E = E>I

Each of those phases of the general operator, ó, can diminish, increase or divide the ‘object’. And so we can divide the operator ó into 4 operators: a mere equality, a sum, a division when the information preys on the energy and divides it or a multiplication when it reproduces it as the energy controls it and uses it with its energy to reproduce. These kinds of events that the equation describes are thus the beginning of a fascinating adventure, to generate reality with the combinations and partial equations derived from the generator equation.

Physicists do it basically when considering SxT systems, which we have explained briefly before, and yet that is not so detailed, so we can consider that we can do either 2 dimensional studies (sxt systems), 4-dimensional analyses (E-Re x I x S) where we decouple space into energy and reproduction, limbs and bodies and information between knots of times and flows of social information, languages and networks. This dual decoupling of space and time create a 4 dimensional Universe and 4 dimensional types of equations, of the type:  (Se<=>-S2i ) n=st

These 3 combinations of the cycle are 3 forms in which the parameters of them change by transfer between the element of the left (the herds) and the right (the networks).

The fight between herds and networks though is parallel in E=I and that is the definition of an organism. In the other 2 stages or events there is dominant arrow from the relative predator reproductive, energetic body or informative system.

But many laws of science are ceteris paribus analysis of that equation and/or one of its parts. We just have to consider the generator equation, a group structure with a neutral element, 1. Then we can study only a certain part of it. For example, making n=1, the transcendental arrows disappear; if I or E = 1, we are studying only the energetic or informative part of the system; and so on.

It must be in any case understood once and from all that the equation generate events primarily and those events seen as fixed forms become spatial organisms, but the equation is an equation of time rhythms, given by the st-frequencies of the systems. Let us consider what are the parameters of the equation’s main parts:

– The parameters of E are spatial parameters.

– The parameters of I are temporal parameters.

– This fundamental duality, is thus the 3rd key element to the transformation of a topological algebra as this equation is (where I is a topological space, e is a metric space of energy and <=> is the cyclical exchange space or toroid) into metric spaces. We know that part of that equation is an energy parameter and the other an informative one.

Thus the generator feedback equation allows to connect the metric and relational study of the Universe of multiple spaces and times by ordering all the time cycles= arrows=dimensions, we observe in the Universe, all the repetitive clocks in which a certain ‘non-Euclidean point ‘or Universal entity comes once and again to the same topological space in search of its arrow, as its partial equations and more complex systems as a series of connected equations that represent networks, organic or complementary systems, within a given ecosystem.

In our analysis of geometrical i-logic geometries we shall return to those themes.

Recap. 9 arrows of timespace exhaust all Universal events. They are the arrows of energy, information and its complex combinations, the different arrows of social evolution, reproduction and organization in complex, fractal planes of existence, from the simplest atom to the Universe itself: The Universe and all its relative worlds structure in 3 stairs of parts that become wholes. Each one defines a set of 3 arrows of time. Thus, there are 3×3 arrows of space-time: spatial actions of energy and information, exi, organic arrows that create body herds and informative networks, which become organisms, e<=> I and fractal, transcendental arrows that define systems of multiple spacetimes.

Actions and waves. Physical systems display 4 arrows.

We consider several levels of analysis of reality, the abstract, metric analysis of simple systems of energy or information; the dualist analysis of complementary systems of reproductive energy and information, which combine in motions called actions; and the organic analysis of ternary systems, which add a new, self-reproductive arrow and allow the social evolution of systems in transcendental, new super-organisms.

Most physical, spatial systems are perfectly described with the simpler level of energy and information, complementary systems and its actions -though it is left for further analysis the question of the existence of ternary structures in all physical systems (given the fact that simple particles, electrons and quarks reproduce new particles, when given enough energy).

Since all analyses of reality are meaningful even if they do not consider the complete system and all arrows, we shall deal here with complementary systems that perform, exi, actions. They define the 3 basic arrows of existence: gauging information, feeding on energy and using that energy to move in the direction in which we have gauged information

Thus a system that combines information and energy is always able to create ‘motions’ called action, exi, which are the fundamental unit of physical systems. The simplest of those systems is light space, which happens to be the 3-dimensional membrane we live in.

Indeed what we call vacuum-space, the external reality, is in fact light-space. That is, the vacuum is filled with light, which has 3 perpendicular dimensions: a direction of motion, energy or length, in which light moves; a dimension of information or ‘height’, the electric field; and a dimension of reproductive width; the magnetic field. And so we exist in a spacetime of 3 Euclidean dimensions, filled with light, which makes the dimensions of reality the 3 arrows of spacetime of light, to which we add the social dimension of color, given by the number of photons that come together in a single wave. We are ‘swimming’ in a world of light as a fish swims in a world of water with 3 dimensions occupied by that water.

It is indeed the thesis of this work that what we call ‘lateral motion’ of a wave of energy is always a reproduction of its form, imprinted in the medium; and so we consider that the dimension of magnetism in light is in fact its reproductive dimension: Light follows the path given by an energetic field of gravitation, whose energy it absorbs, imprinting laterally a magnetic ‘body’, over which an electric field carried by the photon is built. And from that simple scheme many properties and equations of light will be deduced and many questions answered (such as the non-existence of ‘magnetic monopoles’, since magnetism does not form an informative particle – the photon – which is an electronic, ‘fractal head’ – or the relationships between the gravitational and electromagnetic field, which fees on it).

At this stage the example of light and its dimensions illustrates a tenant of multiple space-times theory: all physical systems are also ternary systems with an energetic, informative and reproductive-motion field, made of social quanta. Since waves don’t move (paradox of Zenon) but imprint the medium they travel through with its form, its information, reproducing it.

The number of dimensions and elements we describe in any system in fact depends on the depth of the analysis. Metric space works basically with 2 or 3 dimensions, as it considers time and space continuous and symmetric (an error, regarding the nature of space, which explains many errors of physics), and ad maximal it adds a 3rd dimension of exi space-time actions. Other sciences, especially biology, go further and analyse 4 dimensions. And that will be the main approach of this introductory work even when describing physical phenomena.

A key set of laws of general systems sciences, which might however make many relationships confuse, are the laws that relate the different actions in space-time of a lower plane of existence and the function they have for the upper scale. We dealt with this theme when studying the synchronicities of systems. Let us consider them now with an example: how the actions of electromagnetic photons, the cellular elements of electrons emerge as different ‘actions’ for the upper scale of the electron.

For example, physicists describe electrons with 4 quantum numbers, which we have translated as the 4 main arrows of times of electronic waves. Yet those arrows in the upper scale of electrons is different from their function for photons; such as the complex arrows of reproduction and social evolution of the lower scale become the simplex arrows of spatial energy and structural form of the upper scale :

–       Thus, the principal number defines the wave-reproduction of the photons in the lower scale electron, and the energetic body of the electron in the upper scale.

–       The secondary number defines the absorbtion and social evolution of a photon in the lower scale, which feeds the electron, but it defines the structural form, I, of the electron.

–       Then the 3rd and 4 numbers of the electron, which regulates its clonic shapes and spin is no longer relevant to the lower photonic scale but it becomes the key element of ‘valence’ in the molecular scale to define the shape and energy of a molecular orbital. There are however many systems that are not complete, often made with an informative, gauging element and an energetic limb, in all systems and disciplines of reality. Or more often there are systems, which become subsystems of a more complex form and perform only a function on this higher reality. For example, a planar field of energy or force might have as light does 3 arrows but it is for a complex atom the field of energy in which the electron reproduces its nebulae; a weapon is a ‘lineal system of metal-energy’, but it comes attached to a human being that ‘gauges’ information, locating the enemy to which it will release the ‘energetic action’ of the weapon; a virus lacks the reproductive systems, but it attaches its informative code to a cell that will reproduce the system. And so we find that some simpler systems need an external, informative or reproductive ‘enzymen’ or ‘enzymes’ to make possible actions with weapons or reproductions of viruses.

And these two essential laws of interrelated multiple times-spaces – the existence of 3 subsystems in all systems or ‘ternary principle’ that allow us to analyse any system in its 3 internal components and the assembly of subsystems as different as a human being and a metal-weapon to enhance the energetic or informative capacity of the whole through symbiotic actions, are key elements to explain how simple systems evolve into complex, organic ones.

Recap. If we consider motion, the reproduction of the form of a wave, even the simplest light-space displays 4 arrows, energy, information, physical actions or speed, exi that reproduces the wave and social evolution of color. Electrons also can be described with 4 magnetic numbers, the main reproductive number the secondary, energetic number, the spin number of informative orientation and the magnetic, social number.

 Internal, topologic and external, Euclidean dimensions.

Another important concept to clarify errors of the metric paradigm is the meaning of ‘internal’ an ‘external dimensions’, where the internal dimensions are the 3 topological functions of a system – its informative, energetic and reproductive topologies – and the external dimensions those of the membrane, medium or ecosystem it inhabits. Thus in all systems we consider 2 types of dimensions:

-Arrows/Dimensions of external spacetime (the form described with external, objective parameters):

Length-energy-motion. +   Height-information +   Width: bilateral reproduction.

Those 3  simple Euclidean dimensions suffice for most external analyses of reality.

-Yet the internal structure of any i=-point requires 3 topologies of 4-Dimensional reality and its complex shapes called:

-‘Planar sphere’ or ‘Peano line’=membrane, limbs of energy

-‘Cyclical toroid’=Reproductive Body of energy x information

-‘Hyperbolic, warped center’=Informative, multi-cyclical head.

This duality considers the Euclidean dimensions an external description of the being, as it moves through the 3 dimensions of the light-space membrane; and the topological dimensions an internal description of the point in its parts and functions. Consider for example the case of a human being:

-Externally all what we see of a human from far away is a point whose energy moves him in the direction of length, but he also has an informative head on top, in the dimension of height, and he has reproduced=repeated his organs bilaterally in the dimension of width.

– But if we were to switch to an internal description we would find a more complex structure, with:

– A warped brain inside that high head, and an eye, which makes with an enormous number of pixels of information an image of the Universe.

– We find a body, below that head, full of cyclical, reproductive organs that combine energy and form to re=produce the substances of our body.

-And then we find our energetic members (a mixture of fractal, broken lines of energy – our limbs that move us in the length dimension – but put together shape a plane) and the external membrane of our being, which is what topologists called a Riemannian, planar sphere.

And as different as all species of the Universe might seem to us, we will be able to describe them all with those simple topological dimensions, which give us the 3 ‘arrows/cycles/ topological’ dimensions of all vital spacetimes.

The sum of all those internal, topological spaces, moving inside a Euclidean, 3 dimensional space in which they trace cycles in search of energy and information to reproduce themselves is what the 3rd paradigm of metric space puts together into a single space continuum and a single arrow of time; what physicists call absolute space and absolute time. And while the error of a single space continuum it’s a mild error, by reducing time arrows to a single lineal arrow in the direction of motion-energy, scientists, specially physicists spatialize, simplify and reduce time to ‘entropy’, or ‘energy’, what the clock measures. And that is a huge error, as we shall see when we correct and resolve the main questions of physics.

We shall call the 3 dimensions of energy limbs that create length motions; of reproductive, wide bodies caused by toroidal cycles and of high, informative systems with hyperbolic brains, the 3 external/internal dimensional arrows of reality. Therefore the 3 external dimensions=trajectories =arrows of existence, length=feeding on energy, height= perceiving information and width=reproducing bilaterally, are motivated by the internal needs of the 3 inner regions of a vital being, its topological ‘dimensions/arrows of spacetime’.

Spacetime and Timespace are also dual definitions that explain those external and internal dimensions dominant in ‘energy’ and ‘form’, because none of the arrows/dimensions of reality is pure: all yin has a yang and all yang has a yin. And so even the simplest ‘species’ of the light-membrane, light itself, has an organic structure, as we have just explained.

Recap. All beings externally move in a lineal dimension of energetic length; perceive from an advantage point of height and reproduce its systems bilaterally in the dimension of width. Internally all of them occupy a vital space with the 3 topologies of hyperbolic information, cyclical, toroidal reproduction and are enclosed by an energetic spherical-planar membrane.

 Social, reproductive, organic Arrows.

Till now we have dealt with the simplex reality you perceive in an obvious manner: the 3 dimensions of spacetime which correspond to the functions of energy-length, width-reproduction and height-information and are common to all topological beings that float in light-space, made also of those 3 dimensions, albeit with a slightly different orientation (speed-length moves the wave of light and so we consider it its dimension of energy, the high electric field gives its form and has the informative photon on top and the wide, magnetic membrane reproduces it). And all this could be written as a simple generator equation, exi=k or e<=>I, where the 3 terms represent energy (e), information (i) and its reproductive cycles (x for simpler, reproductive actions and motions, and <=> for complex feedback, dynamic exchanges of energy & form).

A more complex description of all this is given by the 3 canonical topologies of the Universe: the hyperbolic, informative, reproductive, toroidal and planar, spherical, energetic membrane of which all beings are made.

It would seem that all this suffices to explain most of reality and certainly it is a great jump respect to the mere process of measuring the when and how of metric spaces in a single space-time continuum, where the 3 dimensions of space are abstract, and time is just ‘what a clock measures’.

But there are other phenomena in reality, mainly of social nature, which those 3 arrows do not fully explain.

Indeed, because reproduced forms are self-similar forms, reproduced closer to the parental point, (as in a fractal image, where self-similar Mandelbrot sets are pegged to the parental form), when many forms become reproduced in a tight space they come together into networks and make a bigger system, a herd, or superorganism.

And that game defines the arrow of social evolution: self-similar atoms reproduced in a big-bang associated to form bigger entities, planets and stars. Self-similar cells with the same DNA organize in a palingenetic process to recreate a bigger organism. Self-similar ideas or memes created by a prophet reproduce in the minds of believers, creating a religion or civilization. So social evolution, the 4th main arrow of space-time must be always considered to describe all systems – even if it is not an Euclidean dimension, because in light, social evolution appears as color – since all what exists feeds on energy, gauges information, reproduces energy and information and evolves socially.

But how things evolve socially? It is not enough just to enunciate this social arrow. When we study social evolution in more detail, in fact we find the existence of 3 social arrows:

– ∑: many simplex units of energy that we shall call bites, come together into herds, which we represent with the symbol of a summation, ∑.

– ∑2: Many simplex bits of information come together into networks, which we define with the square of a summation, as networks are defined by having a square number of ‘axons’ that communicate its informative points.

– <=>, Re, E <=>: When those 2 systems come together they create a complementary, cellular organism, body or field, which defines cyclical trajectories between the limbs and heads, the particles and energetic membrane.

Thus the body absorbs bites of energy and reproduces cells of the organism; and we represent it with the ó feedback symbol, the arrow of Reproduction, Re, or as it often comes attached with ‘mouths’ that absorb energy or ‘limbs’ that convert energy into motions, with the E<=> symbol.

Thus all together form a complex, dual, cellular superoganism of space-time, ∑ E<=>∑2i=St or exi=st-ential organism.

And so we define 3 social, organic arrows:

-∑: the arrow of social evolution of energy bites into herds.

– ∑2: the arrow of organic evolution of bits of information into networks tied together into a bigger whole – a head/particle that absorbs bits of information, also called ‘pixels’ and stores a memorial, perceptive image/mapping of reality. This network acts a single being, sustaining in each ‘fractal’ cell, the same informative, memorial mapping of reality that allows it to act as a single one, either internally (same DNA in the cells of an organism, same book of Revelation in the mind of believers that create a God or subconscious collective, same particles in a bosonic state) or externally (cells that store multiple pixels, coordinated by the network into a single image). This is the most complex, fascinating arrow of existence, or transcendental arrow, because it is the arrow that allows reality to become organic, as it makes from simplex parts a whole that emerges as a unit of a bigger space-time plane of existence. Further on, the arrow that puts together parts into wholes dominates as a whole the herd of cells of the body.

And so we define, a superorganism made of reproductive bodies/waves, limbs or fields of energy and social networks of information, which extends through 3 different spacetimes:

– An external ecosystem of energy (st-1 plane of reality) in…

– Which the limbs move by absorbing external energy and the head or particle gauges information by absorbing that external energy as information; and the body reproduces new cells absorbing both energy and information (st-plane).

– Which transcends as a whole (st+1), thanks to the network of information that controls the entire Organism, becoming a fractal space-time world in itself: ∑ E<=>∑2i=St

Recap. The social evolution of herds into body particles gives birth to the arrow of wave evolution; the association of informative cells gives birth to the arrow of network evolution, and both together create ternary, organic systems, which use internal limbs or external fields to feed on energy. Thus a more complex analysis finds that all systems are ternary systems with lineal limbs of energy, reproductive bodies and informative heads, sandwiched between two ±st planes, the smaller st-1 micro-points of energy and information (pixels) and the bigger ecosystem, which only the network of information can observe as a whole that transcends cellular existence (st+1).

Fractal, Transcendental arrows.

We call fractal, transcendental arrows to those arrows that go beyond the organism both in time (generational arrow of existence of the being between its creation and extinction) and in space (ecosystemic arrow), finally evolving together in time and space into a super-organism.

Thus simple ‘active’ complementary systems become complex, organic systems, which finally transcend into super-organisms, till reaching in the transcendental scale the biggest super-organism of them all the Universe.

Indeed, the generation of a being in a life/death cycle will cause a spatial ‘radiation’, as the being multiplies once and again, and so it will create a series of generations in space-time till the species becomes extinct. And so the species can be considered a super-organism with each individual a cells of the system. And we shall see that indeed, the entire life-span of a species follows also the 3 ages of life and its speciation into ternary species of energy, information and reproduction, and its final evolution into a super-organism or its extinction by a stronger species with more exi=stential action/momentum.

And since there is nothing else that we can say of a being before its creation and after its extinction, the 3 transcendental arrows of generational cycles, reproductive radiations in an ecosystem, and transcendence into a higher super-organism finishes all what we can know of any reality, all what is science, all what exists, all the whys of the 4th paradigm.

-St: And so the 9 arrows together give us the complex generator equation of all events and forms of a certain world, universe, ecosystem, reality or superorganism – its total, absolute spacetime description, EXI.

It is the unification equation, described earlier in greater detail that physicists tried to extract from reality but failed because they tried to do it with metric spaces instead of topological spaces and with a single arrow of time energy or entropy instead of the 3x 3 arrows of reality. We shall often quote that equation in its simplified 4 dimensional structure: E x i=st; and call it the existential function.

You too are generated by that equation.

From that general equation we can then descend to the when of its metric details, since each species absorbs different types of energy and information that define the form and speed of its reproductive and social cycles of time. And so from that higher point of view we can then connect according to the correspondence principle each science and species with its specific space-time cycles/arrows – the details of the thoughts of god.

According to the dominance of those triads of arrows we also classify science in physical, biologic and sociological sciences:

– Most physical entities perform only two complementary cycles, most of its existence. So all particles move but few gauge information beyond a mechanical, geometrical series of action-reaction paths; and this explains why physicists have been concerned only with the arrow of energy and motion and metric spaces to measure the trajectories of all those moving particles. Yet in certain cases those particles decouple, reproduce other particles and form more complex atomic systems, and this moves us to the next science on the ladder of complexity, chemistry, which is more concerned with the repetition=reproduction of molecules and its social evolution.

– As we move further into biological sciences, through the ladder of bio-chemistry, biology and sociology we realize that the arrow of energy becomes secondary and the arrows of information= perception, reproduction and eusocial love that bonds minds into social structures dominates.

– In this we are different from physical structures, which are always dominant in energy and motion and create social networks of extreme simplicity with very few elements and variations – so galaxies which are huge aggregations of stars will turn out to be self-similar to electronic nebulae. And in fact we shall find a fractal equation of unification of quantum electromagnetic forces and macrocosmic gravitational forces based in that self-similarity of structure of the infinitely small and big(A,II).

So it seems the Universe has 3 different games of existence: – The physical game of self-repetition of spatial energetic structures that evolves into the bio-chemical game of evolution of reproductive, organic structures; which evolves in complex super-organisms and ecosystems.

We are the summit of that second game of existence that evolves the arrows/languages of information, creating social superorganisms, cultures and civilizations. And galaxies are the summit of the expansive game of spatial structures that develops to its limit the arrow of energetic, simple spatial topologies – reason why there is almost as much data about the Universe that about biological structures and even more data about sociological cultures…

Recap. The sum of all the generational life-death cycles of an organism, which will be repeated a finite number of times between birth and extinction, and its spatial radiations in an ecosystem, creates the transcendental arrow of super-organisms, which evolves from particles to galaxies reality till creating the absolute space-time field, st, of the Universe.

 

PAST TO FUTURE SYSTEMS: ORGANISMS.

The Universe is a tapestry of dimensional space-time beings.

Let us resume what we have learned: The Universe is made of self-similar complementary species of spatial energy and temporal information. We are not in space-time but are made of vital spaces with a duration in time. Our spaces are all made of topological forms of 3 types, which are the canonical types of all the morphologies of a 4-dimensional universe: informative, cyclical, hyperbolic spaces such as the brain, the black hole or the DNA center of cells; reproductive, toroidal cycles, such as those of stars in the galaxy, organs in the body or RNA systems in the cells and a planar sphere, or membrane of energy that isolates the system, allowing selective exchanges of energy and information with the external world, such as the halo of galaxies, the crust of the earth, the protein membrane of the cell, the skin with its sensorial apertures in a living being or the limbs that move us.

All those systems and forms have specific functions, which are also self-similar in all systems and can be reduced to 4 main time arrows or basic cyclical events of existence: energy feeding for the body to be able to reproduce; and information for the mind to be able to communicate and evolve socially with self-similar beings.

And all this can be explained with a single equation, the equation of existence: ∑ Ex∏i=st.

A more detailed analysis further divides the social arrow in 3 x 3 organic and transcendental arrows, completing an exhaustive 9-dimensional analysis of reality.

Thus, the most important arrow is the arrow of informative networks that we shall study in detail.

Recap. All systems, perceive information feed on energy reproduce and evolve socially in bigger systems, because if they do not reproduce their limited time will extinguish the species and if they evolve socially as bigger multicellular organisms they can win in the struggle of existence against simper, smaller beings.

 Scales and symbiosis of complex social organisms.

Thus the commonest system of the Universe is a complementary organism of energy and information, with the 3 topologies of Non-Euclidean points that act as 3 social classes:

-The higher, st+1 dominant class is composed of the informative nucleus, an energetic membrane and its networks that control:

–  A middle st-mass of ‘cells’ in cyclical motion between those 2 discontinuous, limiting zones.

– That transforms the ‘lower’ st-1 energy absorbed through the membrane, coming from an outer world into information pixels and energy pieces to create more informative cells and energetic membranes.

Thus, the st±n parameter becomes essential to analyse energy and information exchanges between the different microcosmic cells and macrocosmic systems of any fractal organism.

If the system is stable because a symbiotic relationship occurs between both networks, we call the complementary, entangled networks – social, organic systems, which extend in two fractal scales of different planes of space-time.

In the previous graph, from left to right, we observe some of those systems as they extract energy from their relative ecosystem/plane of existence:

– A cannibal galaxy traps smaller ones between its informative nucleus and stars’ body, which reproduces its atoms.

– The sun system is protected by a series of planetary rings that extend till the Oort membrane of comets; yet we have to observe those rings according to the Galilean Paradox as still forms extended in space. Within that structure of an informative center of mass, and an extended membrane of space, the sun traps, gravitational and electromagnetic energy and atomic dust, with which it created those planets.

– The nucleus of an atom interacts with other atoms to form complex molecules through its electrons, which are the external membrane. Between them, gravitational and electromagnetic energy ‘feed’ the motion of those ‘dominant forms’ of its organic structure.

– A cell has a central informative DNA and a protein, lineal membrane and conducts (Golgi apparatus) which trap the reproductive organelles that create more DNA and proteins with energy obtained from the external Environment.

– A bird with an informative head, reproductive body and lineal limbs captures an external energy source – a lineal worm.

Those systems, studied with the laws that relate two or three relative, discontinuous planes=networks of energy and information offer some examples of the complex relationships of symbiosis and hierarchical dependence that take place between planes of existence, and its laws, which find applications in all self-similar organisms and space-time membranes, including the dual system of gravitational information and electromagnetic energy of the Universe within which we exist, or the interactions between the nervous, blood and digestive networks or the informative=high class,  reproductive=working  social class and energetic geography of Gaia that structure civilizations.

Most organic systems and its cells are created around the dynamic equilibrium produced by the exchange of flows of energy and information of those systems, which absorb them from the external ecosystem with the aim of reproducing in other region of space-time. Whereas, the ‘physiological’ laws that control those balances and ratios of exchange become the vital or universal constants (biological/physical jargons) of the organism. For example, a human being is a fractal form, made of trillions of cells, connected by flows of nervous information, digested energy and hormonal, reproductive blood messages. Thus a relative infinite number of ΣSe <=> ∑2Ti cells become joined by those 3 networks, creating a human organism.

And doctors consider that we fall sick when the balances and functions of those 3 systems fail.

Further on, all those st-cells together create a unit of the higher st+1 scale, a human being, which through an entire process of iteration, self-organization and emergence becomes part of a higher st+2 scale, the social scale of mankind, of nations and civilizations. And again a series of balances between the social ‘classes’ of information that control the languages of power of the nation – money and legal words – and the reproductive, working class and the energy of the environment, will ensure the ‘life of the civilization’, which otherwise could enter in civil wars or collapse due to pollution and degradation of the environment.

In this manner through eons of evolution, both the human being and the Universe have become balanced, organic systems extended in multiple st-scales of growing social complexity.

The result is a dual or ternary organism: it has a reproductive body, which processes energy with its limbs, reproduces the cells of the organism and obeys a head of information.

So it is a fact of history that you belong to a certain social class, depending on your information and the control you have of verbal laws and financial money, the 2 language of information of human societies. Science calls a dual, physical plane of energy and information, a field of energy forces ruled by informative particles; a biological, dual system an organism with an energy body and an informative head; and a historic system of energy and information, a society with a mass of citizens and an informative government. Yet space-time fields, organisms of energy and information and societies respond to the same laws and properties of Multiple Spaces-Times.

Further on, since each of those systems will in itself possess a ternary structure, where the region that receives information from the head will tend to be slightly more informative and the region that processes energy will be more extended and energetic, we can increase the detail of our analysis by extending it to any number of cells and dimensional, ternary sub-scales. And indeed, more complex descriptions of a human organism consider that we are made of 9 subsystems, which can be roughly divided in energetic, reproductive and informative. And we can also follow the inverse process of evolution of life from simpler systems, which became more complex, decoupled in dual exi, or ternary, exi=r, subsystems and multiply its number of cells, from the initial unicellular bacteria till reaching the human being, the summit of evolution of this planet.

Yet the laws of Multiple Spaces-Times and i-logic p.o.v.s are followed by all the processes of physical and biological systems; among which the law of chiral asymmetry between planes will be the fundamental law to create a hierarchical structure between planes of different degrees of temporal information; since all of them will be communicated by one-dimensional, asymmetric arrows of energy that flow from lower body/reproductive organs into the upper informative ones, or arrows of information that flow from the dominant informative system into the reproductive/energetic networks. And the same happens in physical systems, between the central, informative knots of mass (quarks, black holes) and the external membrane of fractal electrons and stars (in the case of black holes flows between both membranes are called Rosen bridges, which Einstein used to study the exi flows of energy and information between the plane of gravitation and electromagnetism.)

Where we observe Est-1->Ist energy flows from past to future, from the class energy to the informative class and vice and Ist->Est-1 flows of information from the relative future, informative organ to the energetic one. Since a macrocosmic being has more information and it is more evolved than its relative lower plane of cellular existence (a molecule for an atom, a cell for a molecule and so on), it is its arrow of future. Social evolution creates macrocosms from cellular beings, establishing a hierarchical, asymmetric duality of social classes in all systems:

– The information class (neurons, governors, the rich with financial information, and politicians with legal information) do not work=reproduce, but give orders to:

– The st-reproductive class (the cells of the body, the workers, the citizens) of the body which reproduces the forms wanted by the upper class. This class, sandwiched between the other 2 can obtain energy from the lower class and information with the upper class, and through social, democratic love, the sharing of both energy and information, will create new cells, and so it will show a toroidal geometry as it cycles between the ‘external membrane’ that extracts energy and the internal, hyperbolic region of information from where it obtains its formal orders.

– Finally, the energy class, which gives energy to the other two classes, since it receives orders from the information class in exchange from its energy.

In simpler systems the reproductive class might not exist or might absorb the energy which latter handles to the informative caste (reason why sometimes we call a dual reproductive/ energetic system such as the blood system of simple animals the energy system), but in essence this hierarchy between the 3 planes of all physical and biological systems takes place.

This law that we repeat once and again is essential to understand the main difference between space which has parity and it is symmetric and time which is asymmetric as motion from past to future converts energy into information, ‘imploding’ space, and flows from future to past, convert information into energy exploding and unwarping it. And it is at the bottom of all the processes that happen in time, from the life-death cycle of organisms, which always end up warping all energy into form, to feed its ‘selfish’ information cells, to the ‘breaking of symmetry’ that happens in physics in process mediated by the ‘temporal’, electro-weak force.

Thus, the formal analysis and the study of the hierarchies and relationships between any st-fractal and its lower and upper ±st microcosms and macrocosms, is an essential part of i-logic Geometry that can be applied to any fractal system in the Universe and allow to define a super-organism as a dynamic, functional structure, regardless of their form and extension.

Cellular herds become organisms that exchange energy and information through common networks, even when we see those cells de-segregated. The important fact is that all the cells of the organism need to be connected through networks of energy and information. For example, in an anthill, ants are guided by a network of chemical information (pheromones) that has its center in the queen and a network of energy distribution (the anthill and its territory) through which energy cells move (workers). There are also other specialized energy species called warriors. Finally there is a reproductive system localized also in the queen (and its males) that ensures the reproduction of the anthill species. Human societies resemble closely anthills with a higher degree of complexity and cohesion, because they are also social organisms of cells-citizens joined by economic, energetic, informative, legal and social, reproductive networks. When the three networks exist, we consider the being an organism. Without any of those organs however the anthill is not efficient and it dies as an organism. If the queen cannot reproduce, the anthill dies. If workers do not gather energy and warriors do not defend the vital space of the anthill, the anthill dies. If the queen does not guide the workers with chemical information the anthill also collapses. And so it does a society, which enters in an economic, political and cultural crisis that extinguishes the civilization. Only when those 3 networks deliver efficiently energy and information and reproduce the cellular citizens of the society, the vital organism survives. We have to widen our concept of organisms and consider that waves of cells communicated by networks are organisms, even if they have open, dark spaces between them, since they behave in all senses as such organisms. In a fractal universe there are always dark spaces and discontinuous worlds; but what truly matters are the bridges of invisible flows of information that connect those cells into herds, societies, bodies and organisms. Thus an organic species needs 3 networks to exist:

A superorganism exists when there are informative and energy networks that communicate the cells of the organism and the density of energy and information communicated to those cells through the networks is higher than the energy and information cells receive from the external world.

Yet those 3 systems do not have to be pegged spatially to create an organism. On the contrary, the duality between expanding energy and imploding information, continuous wholes and discontinuous parts is the key to understand the flexibility of those organisms that might appear separated as a herd or continuous as a body: the information network attracts them together and the energy network maintains its expansive vital space, separating them. Thus the hardware of information, in this case, neurons are discontinuous but they become a single whole joined by the software flows – electric information jump through multiple neurons, creating its continuity.

The metaphysical question: a ‘conscious Universe’?

The previous results bring about a metaphysical question. Since unless cellular p.o.v.s have a ‘Time will’ –a desire to survive – and a degree of perception of information and energy, the previous social organic structures should not exist.

Indeed, the definition of a superorganism in terms of networks is clear: the organism tends to maintain itself pegged because cells survive inside the organism better, as they receive more energy or information. Otherwise the cells of the organism will become disaggregated and the organism will die. In the case of the anthill the information that ants receive from the queen is more important than the one they receive from the external world. The ants act under orders from the queen. They also receive energy from the anthill where food is stored. In a body, cells receive information from the nervous system, and energy from the digestive system, which is also more important than the energy and information they receive from the external world. In an eco(nomic)system, individual homes receive more energy from the arterial systems of electric networks and roads, from their work places (money) than from their external space, except in agricultural communities. Humans also receive more information from networks of mass-media than from other human cells. Thus, the economic ecosystem is also an organism of humans and machines, whose networks obey the common laws of all physiological networks.

Thus the informative organ is the ‘soul’ of the system that guides, controls and creates its ‘form’, its existence as a whole. Those informative networks, made of cyclical particles of fractal information are similar to what Descartes called ‘vortices’ and physicists masses, joined by ‘res extensa’ or gravitational, attractive forces; what Buddhists called Atmans, joined by flows of communication; what Leibniz called Monads that perceive the Universe; what biologists call neurons, joined by networks of  information. In brief, they are the essential structure that pegs together a relative infinite sum of fractal cycles/cells.

In human societies the army that deploys energetic weapons in the external border and the government and moneyed people that control the informative, legal and financial languages of power are the dominant class. There is a middle class of citizens that obey those groups, which limit their freedom. And there is a lower class of ‘immigrants, enemy nations’, raw materials and machines, whose rights as non-citizens or objects are null. Yet those classes exist in all organic systems beyond human societies:

In a human organism the brain and nervous, informative system, the neurons and the stronger, energetic cells, the leukocytes and the epithelial tissue, control also a mass of cells, which reproduce in the different organs of the body the products the organism consumes, constructed with the bites and bits of energy and information the external world provides and the human organs destroy and reform. If we consider a galaxy, the inner black hole and the halo of dark matter confine a middle mass of stars that turn around the black hole – while the external intergalactic space provides the ‘lower’ bits of interstellar gas. So stars in their spiralled, cyclical movement gather that gas and send it to the black hole that feeds on it. So happens in an atom, in which the electron orbitals gather electromagnetic energy they send to the inner nucleus.

So we might wonder, are human societies just, natural, according to the ternary structure of social classes? No. The present distribution of social classes, proper of human ‘capitalist’ and ‘nationalistic’ societies are not natural to the Universe; since the ‘poor’ and the ‘aliens’ are considered a ‘lower’ class coming from outside the organic system and destroyed accordingly. Yet all men should be considered either informative or middle classes, never lower classes and receive enough energy and information to survive, since we all belong to the same species. And so according to the ‘3rd postulate’ of relative equality, we all belong to the same ‘organism of history’. Indeed the higher and middle classes of any organism act together, as head and body of the organic system. Or else when the cells of the body of any organic system do not receive food, the body collapses and dies. Which is exactly what happens in history when the ‘3rd world’ is treated as a ‘3rd expendable class’ by the ruling classes of the system, both inside and outside our borders and they rebel in revolutions and wars that destroy the organic civilization.

Unfortunately the economic ecosystem spends most resources in the upper classes and ‘different species’, (technological machines and weapons), instead of keeping all the cells of the body of history healthy producing for them the minimal human goods mankind needs to survive (food, education and health-care).

Yet systems survive because its cells are ‘limited’, existing between the central informative region that programs them and the energetic membrane that traps them and can kill them. In all systems, the stick and carrot, punishment and prize duality of negative and positive arrows provided by the 3 physiological networks control the 3 internal cycles of its cells, which have to obey the organic systems if they want to ‘exist’; that is, to perform those cycles. So we often find 3×2 ‘elements’ of positive and negative control, that structure a certain system as the dual arrow of entropy and its 3×2 drives of negative and positive existence.

A fact that explains why cells exist tied up in complex organic systems so well programmed. Since according to organicism, the laws of the Universe are not imposed mechanically but through the will of ‘existence’ of its I-points, which make the best choices driven by their desire to process energy and information and survive. A man, for example, can rebel at his own risk against the networks of power. You can obey an informative law and be rewarded or deny the law and be punished. But if the system punishes you it will extinguish you and another obedient citizen will occupy your place. So most humans always obey the law of its physiological, social systems. Yet if men, who are among the freest of all st- points, as they have self-consciousness, are so slavish; it is obvious that those points whose ‘will of existence’ is a vegetative or mechanical ‘action’, obey totally those networks. Physiologic networks rule indeed any biological organism to the point that doctors consider most sickness caused by the malfunction of physiological networks, which ‘extend’ the sickness to the individual fractal cells they control.

Recap. In any organic system the dominant informative and energetic networks control and distribute its energy and information in 2 flows with opposite entropic directions: information orders of control are flows that depart from the dominant informative singularity towards the membrane across the middle class; while energy comes from the membrane towards the center. Both flows create together a dual structure of max. Space-Time force or Momentum, the fundamental parameter that defines the power of any organism (max. ExI). So together the dominant classes organize with their dual energy and information the fractal elements of the intermediate, middle mass zone or body. Finally the middle class will absorb, destroy and transform the minimal fractal units of temporal energy of the external Universe, or lower class, which is divided in small, disorganized fractal elements; transferring part of them to the membrane and center.

Temporal classes according to its existential force.

Let us consider the previous structure from the pure perspective of time dimensions by considering the informative, more evolved class, the future class – since it becomes reproduced in higher measure towards the future; the reproductive system, the present and the relative energy that dies and becomes dissolved as energy of the other two, the relative past, since it will become extinguished. To that aim we shall use the concept of existential force, which defines the survival and hierarchy of those 3 classes.

The networks in control of organic cells are topologically related to the 3 zones of any st-point.  Both together define the existence of ‘3 social classes’ with 3 clear temporal, organic functions in all systems of the Universe that we define according to its relative TxE force:

– Max.I x Max E: The future, dominant quanta are the informative center or brain and the energetic membrane. In an organism, they are symbiotic and control the intermediate region: they absorb energy and information from the external world, passing it to the intermediate, ‘middle class’ region to replicate the specific temporal energy they need. In ecosystems they are the top-predator species and often establish Darwinian relationships, as men and lions do.

The Universe creates fractal actions that combine energy and information, I X E. The informative center is the fastest geometry, processing information and the membrane is the longest entity, moving and processing more energy, their combined fractal actions Max. E x Min. I, are more powerful than the rest of the actions of the system. In ecosystems those cells work often in collective herds, which act simultaneously, joined by a common informative language that multiplies their fractal action, against disorganized forms. The result is a universal arrow of social evolution that creates from individuals to herds, and from herds, tightly packed organisms, directed by an informative language, since a herd is less efficient than an organism. So men have evolved socially in groups, hordes, tribes and tightly packed nations, controlled by legal and financial languages. Top predator ants and bees are the most successful insects, because they developed super-organisms with chemical languages. In the Universe black holes fusion in bigger black holes that gather in the center of the galaxy, acting as ‘gravitational animals’ that perceive gravitation as information (as animals do with light), controlling with gravitational waves their stars. While stars are gravitational plants that absorb gravitational space-time as energy, as plants do with light and can’t evolve informatively. Finally in the cell the informative RNA forms herds that control and organize their organelles with the genetic language.

-E=I: A mass of present, cellular quanta form the intermediate region or ‘body’ of the organic system. It is the working, re=productive ‘middle mass’ that re=produces most of the complex elements of the organism under the orders of the informative classes. They are the workers of human societies that reproduce their goods under monetary orders. They are the stars of galaxies that reproduce their atoms. They are the herbivorous animals in the ecosystem on which carnivores prey. They are the electrons of the atom that gather electromagnetic light for the nucleus. They are the stars of the galaxy. They are the glandular cells that form the organs of a body and reproduce their substances controlled by the neurons. They are the proteins and genes of the cellular ecosystem. They are the citizens of a political system that obey the informative laws.

– Min. E x Min. I: Together the upper and middle, informative and reproductive brain and body prey and feed on the external, ‘lower’, past class, made of bits of information and bites of energy of minimal size, which the other classes absorb from the external world or ecosystem, beyond the discontinuous limits of the world that becomes the ‘vital territory’ of the organic system in which it obtains its temporal energy to energize and inform themselves, destroying those lower, energy quanta in the process. The lower class tends to be an undifferentiated mass made of fractal pieces, full of energy with minimal informative perception: divide and win. They are plants on Nature; they are the stellar dust and dark energy that feeds and informs the galaxy; they are light quanta, carbohydrates and water in the genetic, cellular ecosystem; they are the machines of the economic ecosystem; they are those punished by the law in societies: criminals, enemies and emigrants, submitted to the racism of the other classes. They are the food and red cells of the blood system, without informative nuclei.

In Time the 3 regions establish a relative order from past to future, as the external, fractal forms that penetrate into the st- point are the relative past of the space-time field, which become destroyed and processed by the central region, the relative future towards which they move. So the central form is the future and the external world is the past. While in between those 2 limits, the intermediate region becomes the relative present of the system. In the galaxy, the black hole is the relative future of the stars than in the future will end up falling into the black hole; while the stellar dust is the relative past-energy they consume: ∑ Min.E + Min.I (Past, energy class st-1)=> exi: Present, Reproductive class (st) => Max. ExI (Future, dominant, top predator Class: st+1).

 

III. PHYSICAL MINDS: SINGULARITIES

Physical particles. Boson Minds.

300px-PIA16695-BlackHole-Corona-20130227

In the physical realm, besides our electronic minds there are gravitational minds, black holes and masses, which Einstein defined as foci of gravitational space:

‘Space=Energy is motion relative to a simultaneous frame of reference=a mind’ A. Einstein

We added in italic the concepts of Multiple Spaces-Times equivalent to those used by Einstein, who understood space as a moving energy warped by a mass, a frame of reference that ‘measures’ space-time. Yet Einstein was an abstract physicist, philosophically shy, and so he did not considered how a ‘mass’ can measure – an informative, mental action.

We consider that a mass or any particle of the Universe can measure space-time because it can perceive a minimal quantity of the gravitational or light forces that make up the 2 physical membranes of reality. Some particles exist only in one of those membranes (point-particles like quarks who exist only in the gravitational world or light which exists only in light-space). Other complementary entities, such as atoms co-exist in both membranes. All of them should be able to make relative, different measures from their P.O.V.s, which will allow them to act-react in their world but will differ from the relative measures of humans or machines, we call reality.

‘Naïve realism’ affirms that for example, the distance between you and me is exactly 2 meters, because an electromagnetic signal or rod measures it as 2 meters. This is not truth. Reality goes beyond what we see and measure with machines: The distance of 2 meters happens to be in light measures or light space.

But if we measure with feet as the Greeks did, 2 becomes 6. And if we do not measure in light-space the light we see, but in gravitational space, as Einstein proved it, the distance would be bigger, as light warps the more extended, non-Euclidean world of gravitation in which the membrane of light space-time we call reality floats. Thus, our light-world is a reduced version of the gravitational world: a simplified Euclidean surface, whose 3 coordinates, x, y and z are perpendicular and lineal as the 3 fields of light, the magnetic, electric and wave-field are.

We exist in a space-time membrane made of light, whose final structure is the 2.7 k basic light membrane emitted by gravitational black holes that becomes the background frame of reference of our light World, only a fractal membrane of the infinite Universe.

The Universe is more complex than our simplified, naïve sense of reality that thinks the space-time membrane of light that humans inhabit and see is all what there is to it. With the same reasoning, if we had not eyes to measure the light-universe, but merely noses to smell it as ants do, we would see even a more reduced world, as our pixel unit of reality would be a pheromonal atom. The mapping of reality by our mind would be shorter and so distances would be perceived as smaller, as fewer pixels would create our smelling mind.

How the process of gauging information takes place in the Universe? We can only hypothesize that perception is an inner quality of the motions of the Universe. In other words, a software image of reality, a fractal mirror made of forces is a whole, who perceives itself. So the electronic image of the Universe a human mind has ‘perceives in itself’; and as the image changes when we move the head, our ‘ego-self’ made of images and words seems to change.

So should happen in physical particles that focus the forces of the Universe. Yet if we observe externally the process, according to the 3 topologies of Non-Euclidean points we can describe objectively those events of absorption of energetic forces by cyclical particles (charges and masses) as topologic transformations of external, lineal forces of energy into cyclical motions.

Those cyclical motions finally reach the toroid center of the particle, a double ring or singularity of increasing height, which should perceive the ‘translation’ of the information carried by those forces. Then those forces are transformed again into flows of energy and expelled back to the Universe, as magnetic flows in atoms or gravitational dark energy in black holes.

In most particles, it all starts in a surface of energy that curves itself into cyclical motions, which become smaller, faster and reproduce into faster fractal cycles, till reaching the center. Yet those forces, will never reach as quantum physicists believe the central point of infinity; because the cycle will fractalize into new cycles moving upwards in the informative dimension of height (Belgrami semi-sphere depicted in the graph of the previous paragraph) till it becomes expelled upwards through the poles, as a thin line of forces. And so the center of a fractal point, where physics find infinity remain silent, still virtual images, the perceptive eye of the hurricane or the black hole:

A flow of forces converges toward the event horizon or external membrane of the point (the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole or the Bohr Radius of the atom).

Beyond this membrane, the flow of forces starts a process of creative, formal warping, as it rotates at increasing speed and also increases its frequency (height dimension), in each cycle. Because a bidimensional vortex stores more information than a lineal frequency, as it adds a new dimension of form, those forces acquire information. So we observe a bidimensional, cyclical wave of high frequency/informative mass that accelerates toward the center, becoming a convex topology, which the equations of black holes show, as the dimension of space becomes a high temporal dimension.

And finally the left-overs of the force – once a mirror-image is formed inside the toroid center of the particle, called in topology a Belgrami cone – are shot up through the poles as a magnetic flow in charges or a flow of dark energy in masses, invisible to us, but observed in quasars. Those flows of magnetism or dark energy of maximal speed and minimal form, once again will start a cycle of information, warping again into light under c-speed. So galactic black holes emit dark energy that becomes a seminal flow of protonic matter, which might give birth to a new galaxy, as it is observed in the galaxy M83.

Recap: A dynamic analysis shows that most events of physics are transformations of lineal forces back and forth into cyclical motions (particles and charges), which can be described as topological transformation between toroid and spherical or planar geometries.

The many worlds=minds interpretation of reality.

All fractal points are Galilean paradoxes that perceive and act with a will defined by their desire to survive, absorbing energy and information from their environment.

Tƒ that aim the mind creates a ‘subjective world image’ of reality tailored to achieve its arrows of time; while the rest of reality is a relative ‘dark space and dark matter’ of other cat alleys and networks we are not interested on. Thus we exist in a single fractal universe of infinite worlds, which are mirror-image of that single Universe.

The difference with the quantum interpretation of multiple Universes is clear: now the ‘quantum Universes’ co-exist as mental world in the same single reality.

Such paradox explains the self-centered behavior of all systems that fix reality into form. The mind sees stillness and hence death in all those forms in fixes in its brain and yet all has movement all has a life to it; all forces can be understood as languages when the proper codes are translated.

Indeed, for all what we said it is also obvious that the intelligence of the Universe doesn’t speak a single language, understood by man, but all beings can perceive and remember information, stored in rhythmic patterns and linguistic codes. The resolution of those codes in different languages and scales is indeed the essence of knowledge. Each species has limited languages of perception, the most complex perceive more languages and forces. In the atomic world, quarks, the most complex particles perceive, ‘see’ we say in gauge theory, all the forces.

They are the most complex particles, probable cells of the black hole. In our world, men are the most complex beings. Nevertheless, animals who understand only smelling, chemical codes and visual codes are also intelligent and so are electrons who do not perceive gravitation in the atomic word – we are in fact electronic minds as computers are. Languages can use any of those codes. Cephalopods developed both the first complex eyes and a pigmented skin, which changes and modulates emotional messages in a silent code understood by other squids. Insects use magnetic codes to guide swarms.

Recap. Reality is a game of mental worlds of information. But we need to translate those languages to reveal its intelligence to the dumb human being who speaks so few codes properly and thinks the rest of the intelligent Universe is mute.

The speeds of time: different mind rhythms.

The rhythms of existence are organic, vital. We do not see them in stones and plant, because rhythms vary its speed and men only consider vital rhythms those similar to theirs.

Each species has a different rhythm of perception and existence, a different language of knowledge and mind, a different speed of times or capacity to act-react in the Universe. The rhythms of rocks are slow. So are the rhythms of galaxies. Thus, we transform mathematically the different rhythms and speeds of times to see them alive. For example, when we see in fast motion the living cycles of plants that seem dead, in slow motion, they acquire living properties. It is again the Paradox of Galileo: we see many temporal cycles as fixed forms in space, as we see the moving Saturn rings as a fixed form, yet all is moving, cycling in an organic way.

Physicists don’t understand that their clocks of time are abstract inquisitions of the mind. Instead of a ‘moving cycle’, often a living ‘ time’, when they think of time they see a number in a graph. Yet even a watch measures the cycle of expansion of its inner spiral, made of metal that dilates, expanding space; even the sun measures a year-cycle as it swims on the gravitational flows of the galactic spiral, feeding on fractal, gravitational space.

Clocks are brains that measure cycles of time. So today the clocks of science have evolved into cyclical computers that are truly ‘metal-brains’ of machines. Time is measured as information for biological, survival purposes. Since the ‘fastest brain-clocks’ of temporal information survive better. They see with more detail everything alive and act-react faster to the Universe. So our incapacity to see a living Universe is only a proof of our limited intelligence and memorial detail.

Andre Guide affirmed, regarding a similar phenomenon, that ‘the more insensitive the white man is to the beauty of Africa, the more he despises and mistreats the black people’. So happens today with humanity at large with Nature.

 Recap. When we understand that there are many energies that feed space-time beings, many ways to inform brains, many speeds of perception and hence life; yet all are harmonic with each other, a deeper philosophical sense illuminates our mind: We are part of the same Universe and share the common properties of any of its infinite organic systems.

The harmonies of living points: Chip paradox.

A huge organic system of temporal energy like a planetary core crystal might form an image-thought each day; a plant thinks slowly, a fly sees faster, a rat beats its heart faster than we do. For example, spiral and elliptic galaxies are phases of a feeding cycle in which the spiral bar appears and disappears after collecting interstellar gas for the black hole every 1010 years. Scientists are now ‘putting together’ many similar dual forms that are phases of an organic, existential cycle.

This is the new trend in Astrophysics: First neutrons and protons were considered 2 particles but now they are 2 phases of a nucleon Sp (proton) <->Tƒ (neutron) cycle, as nucleons absorb pions, transforming into each other so fast we can’t see it in detail. Last year we realized that the 3 neutrinos were part of the same particle, mutating its state.

The same phenomenon happens when we see a human being externally: our skin appears as a fixed organism in space as its cellular cycles are perceived as a stable form.

Only anthropomorphism and the limits of perception make us differentiate those scales. Yet when we ‘enlarge’ the image of a non-AE point, for example, an insect, the detail of the information we observe grows and so the world of insects is as rich in meanings and forms as the macro-world in which we live. Since all waves carry the same amount of fractal information regardless of its spatial size, according to 2 simple, paradoxical laws: the law of the vortex for cyclical, implosive, attractive ‘particles’ (charges and masses), Vo x Ro=K, and the fractal law that defines transversal, explosive waves, Sp/v(t)=K. Both show that temporal energy increases when the masses or waves cycle becomes smaller.

All is alive yet with a different rhythm, a different beat. The beat of each temporal organism is an action-reaction cycle with a different clock, a different fractal rhythm and temporal speed. They are all around you. In a garden, the wings of a ‘hummingbird’ take energy from the air 200 times per second. It is a clock faster than the energy beat of your heart, 80 beats per second. The energy of the wind moves the leaves every 2 minutes.

A gardener is a clock that waters plants a beat each day… Those action-reaction cycles are everywhere in the Universe. Some beings are faster in their active cycles like the hummingbird; some are slower like the plants and the galaxy. In most cases the bigger the species are, the longer they take in each of their active cycles:

A galaxy turns around every 200 million years, the Earth every day, your eyes beat and absorb light-energy every second, the hummingbird’s heart beats 800 times every minute, the electron turns 30.000 cycles per second. Each organism, each region of the Universe, has a different speed of feeding and perception. People think that slow species are dead. But that is not true. They tend to be energy species that just have slow rhythms of information and live longer.

While more informative, evolved species think faster and live shorter. Often the smaller the species the faster it can complete its cycles of information. So brains are small and chips evolve, becoming smaller as they become more powerful. Yet chips last a couple of years. And man, an informative species seems so self-destructive, so loving of information, the age, which precedes death, that we might be the shortest living animal on Earth.

The main law of existence is the balance between space and time, SxT=K. As we diminish in spatial size in the Universe, beings become faster in time, creating a balance according to which, smaller beings perceive and exist faster, being able to escape, slower Goliaths.

Those regularities of the game of existence show a certain equalitarian justice in the Universe. Indeed, in each world-ecosystem the subjective existence of its organic systems is similar, despite their different size. So we can gather them in ‘families of species’ around a ‘constant of action’, K=T x Sp, which is the product of its speed of perception or frequency of perception of temporal information and its spatial extension. For example, it seems all mammals have the same metabolic existence: The rat lives less than an elephant but her heart beats faster. That faster perception speed also prevents small species to become extinct in the same ecosystem inhabited by bigger species, as they act-react faster and so they can escape top predators.

For example, according to the previous inverse law of mental speed a fly sees 10 times faster than human do, since flies are smaller, so they perform 10 visual fractal åctions by each human blink. Yet because its brain’s fractal neuronal density is not very high, it is not a top predator as robotic insects might be in the future.

Curiously enough the oldest insects, ant queens and cockroaches, can live up to 7 years. Yet cockroaches react in 20 milliseconds and humans in 200. Which means that if they perceive time cycles 10 times faster than we do, subjectively they process 10 times more fractal åctions of temporal energy, or ‘dharmas of existence’ (philosophical jargon). So they live the same subjectively life of 70 years… the same length of a human existential= generational cycle.

It follows that there are parallel worlds, one for each relative hierarchical space-time scale, based in different Constants of Existence. In physical worlds the most important of those constants are the Universal constants of force, which express the previous K= ExI balances in different abstract ways. For example in quantum theory H= ExI is always constant (Heisenberg Principle). But that constant of the microcosmic world is different from its equivalent constant, temperature, in the atomic world, which also shows a self-similar balance for gases: P(t)  xV(Sp)=nkT.

Other constants however are written not as TxS=K balanced, but as Sp/I or I/Sp processes of Darwinian evolution, which define instead of organic balances, processes of transformation of certain energy into for and vice versa. The most important of those constants in the 2 physical space/time planes are G and Q, which represent, as the Newtonian and Coulombian formula shows, T/Sp, Mass-Charge/Distance events, in which in words of Einstein, cyclical masses absorb and bend the energy of space. On the other hand, in the electromagnetic world light-space is absorbed and transformed, curved into electronic form.

Yet since the density of information of the electromagnetic world is smaller than that of masses, given the fact that electrons are lighter and more extended in space than gravitational quarks, paradoxically the energy of its electromagnetic constant is much bigger. 

Thus the relative transformations of gravitational and light spatial forces into masses and charges are also ruled by decametric harmonies, as those of the biological speed of action-reaction of flies and humans. All together we can consider a simple scheme of the main many-worlds of the Human Universe, according to their relative energy and information density. Indeed, According to the different forces of the Universe, each organic system has a different mind since it absorbs different temporal energies and so it creates different mental, linguistic ‘spaces/times’, relative virtual worlds, mirrors of the Universe.

The world of each being represents a quantity of spatial information with a size, form and number of dimensions that are relative to the spatial reach, form and dimensions of the informative, linguistic forces it uses to observe the Universe.

So while the Universal Syntax all minds use to create their virtual maps of the Universe is homologous in all beings, in as much as they reflect a single Universe, the details, quantity and quality of the information of those maps depends on each brain; since worlds are multiple, fractal, diffeomorphic. 

So, depending on which type of temporal force of energy each fractal being absorbs to create its mental map we can define different worlds or ecosystems in which a certain force is shared by multiple discontinuous Fractal points that interact only with the other points of the same ecosystem but now with parallel worlds. For example, masses are fractal nodes that inform and/or perceive gravitation, which we do not see. We are fractal knots of light perception. Ants have olfactory brains that perceive atoms. Different beings live in parallel discontinuous worlds within the same Universe.

Even an electron, the smallest form known to man, processes light information and jumps towards a moving photon, absorbing its energy to enhance its survival chances. Equally, black holes and quarks process gravitational information, locating themselves in the best position to absorb it as masses. While a chip uses digital information to guide a machine, etc. There are other spaces and ways of measuring time besides light and clocks, other possible virtual worlds and intelligences besides man. Since man is made of the same atomic material that the rest of the Universe, the capacity to communicate in this universe – the most clear prove of life – is not exclusive of human atoms but a property that takes place through different atoms and forces; including metallic atoms such as those of computers or gravitational forces used by celestial bodies. So men talk, chips digitalize, animals see, plants ‘smell’ and masses process gravitational information.

We classify those worlds, according to the volume of temporal energy their linguistic forces carry, in a scale of increasing st-complexity, ruled by the Black Hole paradox: The smallest and faster particles scan with more detail the Universe; so they carry more information and create bigger, faster mental worlds, inhabited by species with more TxS force. Accordingly we consider 4 basic worlds:

– Big, slow atomic quanta create animal olfactory minds that perceive small metric territories inhabited by small animals like ants.

– Smaller, faster electrons create electronic minds that perceive kilometric territories inhabited by bigger animals like human beings.

– Photons create bigger worlds of planetary size perceived by huge machines and chips (the brain of future robots) at global scale (Internet, satellites, etc.).

– Gravitational forces of reduced size create words of galactic size, which might be perceived by celestial bodies like Black Holes (minds of the galaxy).

So the Gravitational world is bigger than the light world, bigger than the electronic world, bigger than the molecular world because paradoxically gravitons are faster and smaller than photons, which are faster and smaller than electrons, which are faster and smaller than molecules. So a black hole can perceive an image ‘with more detail’, more ‘pixels’. And since gravitation is faster than light it should ‘change’ the fractal mind’s images it creates faster. On the opposite extreme, plants and olfactory animals perceive molecules, which create images ‘with huge pixels’ that offer little detail and change very slow. Thus we consider that every organic system in the Universe, which processes information and survives efficiently, is a focus of a dual force that carries temporal energy and helps him to act-react externally in a manner that seems to improve the survival of that entity.

Each bigger world and faster language increases the TxS force of its species, which become top predators. And indeed, the analysis of the theoretical speed of informative perception in black holes has shown that they are the fastest ‘computing minds’ of the Universe. So black holes can easily destroy a planet; huge machines kill animal life; human beings kill olfactory ants and insects kill plants. It means top predators are defined in terms of the power of their linguistic brains.

Reality is a game of Russian dolls in which each bigger Doll /World encloses the smaller one. The gravitational World encloses the light world, which encloses the electronic world, which is bigger than the atomic world of ants and so on.

Recap. Each species has a rhythm of times. Slow species are perceived as dead space by faster species. We think plants do not perceive because they are slow in their rhythms of Times. Yet they are alive, feel, and sense in a chemical manner, through their roots and leaves.

VORTICES OF TEMPORAL INFORMATION

The 0th isomorphism studies the Œ-points in a geometric way, without its algebraic description, which is given by the Fractal Generator (1st isomorphism).

Thus the Œ-isomorphism considers the self-centered, mental, linguistic analysis of any given entity, which in the case of physics, we shall agree on this with Galileo, is mathematical. That is, the minds of the physical systems that enact the actions of the physical Universe must be mathematically oriented, because the law of motions and actions of physical systems are better expressed in mathematical form.

The second element of the œ isomorphism is the study of the membrane+ point-particle or mind that structures the superorganisms of reality, in the physical case it implies the study of the 3 fundamental œ points of the 3 scales of Nature, the œ-point of electromagnetic systems (the photon), the œ-point of thermodynamic systems, the electron, and the œ-point of gravitational systems, the quark, in the 3 scales of relative growth of those systems.

The theme being so extensive, we shall merely introduce two elements of it, the non-Euclidean geometry of the 5th dimension and the unification equation of charges and masses, the 2 time vortices of the ∆-1 and ∆+1 quantum and gravitational scales. Why if those 3 relative scalar points are similar we do not perceive them as such? There is one objective reason: fractals are similar in each scale, not equal, so a atom is not a galaxy but similar to it in 5D metric. And a subjective unrecognised one – human perspective distorts what we perceive from upper scales – being 96% invisible dark matter, and from lower scales, much more as the faster time cycles gather far more information from our slower point of view, seeing entire time cycles as spatial drawings.

Unlike other sciences, where the human observer does not interfere with the observable, neither thinks his interference matters, in physical systems, specially those far removed from humans – quantum and relativity, the human observer does change the observable, and on top of that, it does NOT recognize this is ‘his problem’, not the problem of the observable it destroys. In brief, this ‘quantum paradox’, only compares to the ‘anti-quantum paradox’ of social sciences, which is its inverse. There the observer is so small that the observable, the people-castes on power, interfere with him, preventing true social sciences to develop objectively, as the observable will kill the observer if he tries to say the truth about military or financial dictatorships. And yet, the observable will think is the fault of the social scientist to tell the truth. For example, Heisenberg and Bohr affirmed that because we could not distinguish particles it was the fault of particles that became ‘indistinguishable’.

For that reason we bring in the study of the Œ-points of physics (the observable, photons, fermions, crystals and black holes that manage the 4 scales of physical systems from a Tƒ-informative, particle point of view) also an analysis of the observer, the quantum physicist or rather human ‘ego-centered’ believer, to fully clarify what should be objective science, and its methods of truth that we resume in a ‘logic formula’” Œ=ESc³, each letter signifying a key measure of truth of objective science

1. The need to evolve the logic and mathematical ‘undefined’ elements of the Universe.

The reader should be aware that there are 2 scientific view of reality, which have always fought for supremacy in Science:

– The larger, all encompassing view of philosophers of science, which considers the existence of a living Universe gifted both with perceptive and organic qualities. So Plato said ‘reality is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called Logos’. Such Universe is made of infinite broken points or monads, each one hosting a different world view, each one a mirror of a larger unknown single Universe, whose image is stored in the mind of each ‘point of view’ or entity of the Universe; which also applies to the multiple points of view of human beings and its languages of perception, all of which are valid to make a mapping mirror of reality – so Upanishads would say ‘the languages of god are infinite’.

It is the most profound view– older in time, as it can be dated to the first philosopher of science, Plato with the myth of the cave and the first Logician, Aristotle, in his book Organon, in the western decoupling of history, and to their counterparts in the East, the Taoists, WengWang and Lao, and the Hindi and Buddhist philosophers – and larger in space, as it aims to explain both all possible minds of the Universe and ‘all’ knowledge of Humanity’ – all the experimental facts of all species, and all languages of human knowledge– the mathematical languages of space, the temporal verbal and logic languages, but also the human senses and artistic forms.

In terms of time motions, is an organic theory, which defines time as changes and explores multiple changes, both in motions of space, studied by physics and changes of information, in time, or evolution studied by biology. So Aristotle recognised 6 motions, generation, growth, locomotion, evolution, diminution and extinction, which together form the world cycle of existence of any physical being. While in the east, those motions were reduced to changes of yang-energy and yin-information and its ∞ combinations.

– The reductionist view of mechanicist, XVII c. ‘deist’ physicists, which only considers a restricted part of reality – physical systems; it only accepts a language of description, abstract mathematics; only defines a form of motion in time, external translation in space or ‘locomotion’; and denies organic self-sufficient processes to matter modelled as a mechanism, hence in need of a creative force or God, which the founding fathers of physics, pious believers in Yhwh, thought to be the biblical God.

And yet surprisingly enough this mechanist, deist, mathematical view pretends with those very limited ‘elements’ to have a Theory Of Everything that makes sense of all what exists. And what is more surprising, it has achieved global recognition as the ‘high popes of science’, excluding the work of philosophers of science from the search of ultimate knowledge. Such reductionist theory is called Τ.O.E. and really only deals with a faulty attempt to unify the forces or ‘locomotions’ of the Universe –  translations in space, ignoring all other motions=changes of time and information, in biological and creative and extinctive processes.

This is largely the product, not of the achievements and merits of physical theories in the explanation of reality but of its praxis – the construction of machines and weapons, which are the ultimate source of power of our technological civilization.

But the confusion of technology with science and knowledge, is of course a falsehood, which carries a heavy toll for our understanding of reality. It first eliminates all internal elements of knowledge, the mind, and its languages.

Multiple languages describe reality. We need to evolve them.

Now the key difference between a philosopher of science like Leibniz and a Physicist like Newton is this: Leibniz as Aristotle and Descartes before him, was conscious that the language first defines the world we perceive, and NOT the Universe. So it is a humble realization of the minimalist nature of human egos. The Physicist has reduced THE ENTIRE universe to the world-perception of a human light space-time ego centered point of view. So he lacks sense of humor and his arrogance is infinite. Because he confuses the infinitesimal of his mind with the infinite Universe. This we shall stress once and again. The physicist as all humans IS only an electronic mind that fits an infinite number of cyclical space-time beings, into a geometric linguistic mapping within its ‘monad’. And he is NOT aware of it. So his arrogance is supreme:

œ-point x ∞ Universe of time space cycles and worlds = fixed linguistic mapping

The 3 great philosophers of sciences of western thought (and their counterpart eastern philosophers of Taoist and Buddhist cultures) were always aware of this. The cut off happened when Kant rejected Leibniz and became a Newtonian. But at least Kant realized that the human Euclidean mind was a light space-mind and not necessarily all, as impressionist painters will latter.

So the human mind-language is a mapping made with light of the Universe,and uses the 3 perpendicular coordinates of light to simplify all the information of reality:

MOMENTU

In the graph, we see how light constructs our view with 3 simple lineal motions, the electric, magnetic and c-speed axis, reason why we see light as a fixed space (relativity and constancy of c-speed). Yet other beings can map out reality with other pixels, atomic smells, gravitational forces, digital numbers. So we need to expand our notions of mathematical points, lines and planes, as they might be constructed with different pixels.

What all those mappings of reality will have then in common will be not linguistic units (call it numbers, words, atoms, colours, etc.) but the ‘reference of all of them’, which is the Universe itself, the whole, and its fundamental components, which are spatial energetic motions, and cyclical, temporal forms of information, stored in their cyclical clocks.

We are still talking of 2 ‘elements’, which can be well-defined geometrically, but also mapped out with other languages. As they are richer in meaning. For example, motion in physics is associated to open lines – the shortest distance between two points, with entropy an expansive motion, with energy, a measure of motion along the axis of application of a force. And form, information, is associated to clocks, which carry it in the frequency and form of its cycles, to vortices of masses and charges, which act as accelerated inward clocks of Nature.

So it is better to start a description of the Universe, departing of the ‘elements’ of the Universe, in its essential duality, cyclical time clocks of information and lineal motions of entropic energy, and then establish a logic, formal equation that relates both and defines all systems as made of those 2 components:

‘All what exists is a system made of quanta of spatial energy and bits of temporal information that transform each other ad eternal: Spe<=>Τiƒ’

And then consider that each mind and language will try to mirror this Universal grammar, above each world view, with more or less focus and distortion. So verbal systems tend to have a Grammar of subject (information) < verb (action of space-time)> Object (energy of subject), to mirror those ternary systems, and euclidean light space mathematics will also use a geometric 3 dimensional view, where length corresponds to the speed-reproduction of the wave, height to the electric-informative field, and width, to the magnetic energetic field, or a 3 algebraic equation, G(x) operandi F(Y), akin to the ternary structure of words. And colours will be 3, blue associated to information, red to energy and green to reproductive combinations.

So the philosopher of science, or rather of languages of knowledge has a much wider view of reality, than the physicist, which is a believer in mathematics only, as the generator element of reality that comes even above or at the same level than the Universe. In the next graph we see that duality: on the left Mr. Penrose’s pythagorean view that consider the mind of man that ‘imagines’ mathematics, the language and the Universe in equal footing, interacting together. It is an anthropomorphic, arrogant view. In philosophy of science, all languages are lesser mirrors that cannot perceive the entire Universe. So the causality is far less equalitarian. Τhere is out there a Universe, which hosts all the information about itself (Haldane), and a series of beings within it, mirroring with different languages that Universe, among which humans exist with its varieties, of which we do acknowledge mathematics and logic, of space and time, to be the best mirrors, but not perfect enough.

So our first task is to improve both mirrors, by looking at the more complex structure of fractal space, and the more complex causality of cyclical time, the primary elements of the Universe, incorporating those discoveries to the grammar of mathematics, giving birth to i-logic mathematics, the formalism of all systems.

 

The 3 geometries of points of views in the symmetry of the 5th dimension.

Screen Shot 2016-05-14 at 20.49.31

In the graph, the world of human perception was in the work ‘the World’ of Descartes not the perception of the entire Universe, but htat of the Euclidean human mind, which in Absoute Geometry, defines its linearity according to the factor that measures the relative ratio between the ‘cyclical eye radius’ of the informative observer and the lineal ‘space distance’ it measures: Tƒ/Sp ≈ r2/k2 ≈ h/c2 ≈ 0 for the human lineal Euclidean Universe, a expression that we will latter clarify in depth when studying the geometry of the 5th dimension.

Now it is important to notice that those are in the Universal non-human language of measures (Planck units for obvious reasons ay physicist would explain), the parameters of lineal time, T, length in space, and hence those are parameters of area, of the geometry of human beings both in physics and mathematics:

humaneyebased

The Human eye-world: its h-informative and c-speed/motion Tƒ x Sp parameters and mass-charge curvatures.

The Universe thus has different worldviews, with different geometries, according to the size or length rods we use to perceive it with in human beings are the very large rods of ultra-fast light speed, and the size of the ‘quanta’ of information or cyclical form of the observer, which in the human case is extremely small, given the fact that we are electronic eyes, which perceive H-Planck quanta (spins) as our unit of information.

However there are different other worlds of relative sizes of information and length, as we move down or up in the scales of beings of the 5th dimension. All of them can be defined as either elliptic in its perception (larger beings) or hyperbolic (smaller beings), since as we move up and down, the Tƒ/Sp changes, growing for smaller hyperbolic beings and diminishing for elliptic larger beings, departing from our single Parallel Euclidean world.

Mass, Charge and Temperature in Planck’s units

In the case of the unification of scales as time vortices of accelerated time speed, we have shown the simplest one. I have in my archives of 30 years of personal research similar works using 5 other formalisms, Poisson, Lagrange, Einstein, Heaviside and one which might seem trivial, but is so simple we shall bring it also in this introduction: Planck’s numbers. As in both, we obtain the value of Mass and Charge directly from the fundamental constants of the Universe:

Planck Mass: Mp: √hc/G

Electric charge Qp: √hc/ke

It is a beautiful equation because of its simplicity and profundity.

Now the fundamental equation of the Universe is Tƒ x Sp = ∆ and here we can reduce indeed the 4 fundamental constants of the Universe, c, h, G and Eo to that equation:

Sp (c) x Tiƒ (h) / ∆+1 G = ∆+1 Mass

Sp (c ) x tiƒ (h) /∆-1 Eo= ∆-1 Charge

Since speed-motion of light is the unit of spatial motion in the Universe, and h-planck of Form, of time cycles and bits of information, reason why it is a quantised formula.

Thus those two vortices of time, Masses and charges, are the product of the quanta of space and motion and the quanta of time and information of our Universe below and above us, which also means that G and Eo, are the two different curvatures.

it is interesting to see that the minimal charge unit makes 11 electrons roughly which we can take as the natural decametric unit of a charge with an organic motion as a flow of charge. Mass though is much larger as it corresponds to a larger scale of the 5th dimension.

The relationship between ∆+1/∆-1 constants, G/Eo is therefore another constant deduced from those to fully grasp how closely related those vortices are.

Many other constants like ∆µ and the fine structure constant are immediately understood as they can be deduced from those ones.

Thus we are in a world with two limits one of speed-motion and one minimal quanta of information, h and those are the 2 elements the Universe uses to evolve its beings.

What this means will be clear when we explore with more depth the ‘perceptive actions’ of those time vortices, of which our minds are doing with the pan geometry of Lobachevski in the 5th and most important isomorphism. In essence, h is our constant of perception as electronic beings and c, the volume-speed an electronic/gravitational mind can reach; being therefore G/ke, the ratio the system absorbs the energy-information of the Universe in its purest scale of space-time.

Now we shall latter consider the meaning of the Planck units which are far more objective than human units, where c is the speed of space, instead of length, h the quantum of information and time (angular momentum) better than lineal time duration and G and K the relative metric of the 5th dimensional scales, to which we must add the Boltzmann constant for the  Thermodynamic states, and construct with them, an objective analysis of physical 5D. Enough said now to introduce the main time clocks of the 5D Universe.

Perhaps the most interesting simplified value under the new U(q) charge constant is the Proton radius that appears with the same formula, than a black hole, Schwarzschild horizon. This means that a quark particle (a hadron, a proton, etc.) is basically a black hole of the quantum, gravitational scale and vice versa: a cosmological black hole might be a deconfined state of billions of ultra-dense quarks. In such fractal Universe, each small particle could from the perspective of a small observer a macrocosmic form. And each atom could be a galaxy. Such fractal Universe validates the Theory of Great Numbers, which are the parameters of self-repetition of the Universe, which might be from a lower perspective a mere atom or black hole of a hyper-Universe.

unification

 In the graph, the co-invariance of the 5th dimension between size in space and time-speed such us:  Sp x Tƒ = ∆±∞, that is the faster clocks of time run the smaller the entity is, allows to unify the scale of charges and masses at the atomic and galactic scale. The Unification of forces thus is a cyclical equation o the 5th dimension, latter studied in detail, not a lineal equation of temperatures.

Yet self-similarity is not equality, an atom is self-similar to a galaxy but NOT likely a galaxy – reason why for example quantum cosmology is false. Quantum cosmologists consider ‘identical’ the scales of the cosmos and the quantum world, so they use quantum equations for all. This is a hyperbolic error. We have equations for each scale and what we can show, as we did here, is the self-similarities of scales.

All in all, it is evident that what we call a black hole or pulsar is made of quark quanta; it is a fractal of quarks. Thus we can apply to its vortices the laws of Newtonian fluids or the more complex equations of a Non-Euclidean vortices of space-time, as we do with any other ‘medium’ called a ‘phase space’ in physics. They can be considered akin to a hurricane, which is a ‘medium’ of air molecules, or to a tornado, which is a medium of water molecules. All those mediums have limits of speed, which are the same for their lineal forces and cyclical vortices:

Light space-time has a c-speed limit, which is also the limit of speed of a rotational electron vortex and a 0 K limit.

Dark energy and quark matter belonging to the gravitational membrane seems to have a c<10 c lineal and rotational speeds.

Because each space-time membrane has vortices of information and energetic, lineal forces, we need equations of self-similarity, relating informative vortices of charges and masses on one side and gravitational and electromagnetic waves on the other. This is done with gravito-magnetism, which relates cosmic gravitational, lineal waves and electro-magnetic fields. So, the gravito-magnetic formalism just needs to be properly fit within the wider concept of 2 self-similar fractal space-times, to define in self-similar terms, light waves and dark-energy waves of gravitation; as the elementary, actions-units of the 2 fractal scales. Because of the corrections, higher complexity and general ignorance of the gravito-magnetic formalism, here we shall only consider the case of the light-membrane.

Recap: the 2nd fundamental duality of the Universe is its structure in 2 different branes, planes or scales of space-time: the electromagnetic space and the gravitational space, which show different proportions of energy and information and yet, because of the self-similarity of all those branes can be easily unified as 2 self-similar forces acting in 2 different scales.

 

II. BIOLOGICAL MINDS

(To be completed – as those minds are recognised, we shall given the load of work, leave this part in blank)

III. SOCIAL MINDS:

ART, THE MINDS OF CIVILIZATIONS.

ethicsandaesthetics

“Human aesthetics correspond to human proportions, human ethics to the laws of social love, which translate to the Wor(l)d languages the biological laws of Eusocial evolution that define the survival of species”

The mind of the super-organisms of history.

The mind of any superorganism of history are the mind memes, neuronal networks that memorize and learn superstructures of ideas that motivate humans to act and replicate a certain superorganism of history, either a nation or a civilization based in metal or life meme, often both. This trove of instruments and ideologies that make us replicate it, becomes extrenmely complex during the industrial revolution as the forms to replicate ideas, ideologies, instruments and other memes multiply and diversify. In that sense, we shall reduce the concept of culture to the human or biological memes that stream out of the human mind, as opposed to instruments made with materials alien to our mind. In plain sense, that higher mind would be made of our natural time-language of verbal words and our visual eyes, expressed in plastic arts. Literature and painting, legal words and housing, and similar ‘natural goods’ form the skeleton of such life-based cultures.

While verbal art, as the mind of civilisations is far more important,

Yet as we create the metal-earth, the superorganisms of metal and machines that will soon substitute us, we have transfered the forms of ‘life’ into machines and that has influenced enormously art, even art based in human forms which tend to degenerate into simpler forms of iron and gold.  In that regard the concept of art and culture has spread beyond the limits of a life-based civilization, essentially all before the XVIII century, when even in economy the ‘physiocrats considered the goods of the land the wealth of nations.

What is art? The visual mind of history.

Today the concept of art has expanded well beyond the classic meaning of art in history, which will be the concept used in this pages, that relates art and bio-history. This extension of the classic concept of art has happened mainly because today art works are basically products on sale, and so they have acquired values and definitions proper of the economic world, very different from the spiritual definitions that were used to describe art, when it was not considered a market-product, but the fundamental form of knowledge of mankind. Hence a “sacred” endeavor. Since knowledge was considered to be the highest quality of man, the quality which connected us with “God” and his laws of universal creation (either a personal being, as in most western religions, or an impersonal principle as in science and Eastern philosophies).

This second definition is what interests us here: art is a form of knowledge related to the more complex senses of the human mind, the word and the sight. If we define the human mind as a dual system of perception based on the senses of sight and sound perception, we could sum up our mental essence in a single sentence:

I think words and I see images therefore I am a human mind.

A work of artistic knowledge could then be defined as a form of sound perception (literary art, music) or visual perception (architecture, sculpture, painting), translated from the mind into an external medium. However since the process of creation of words and images by the human mind is constant, art was considered to be only those superior acts of mental perception that “evolved” the human mind, beyond its natural level of perception and creativity.

We only perceive a partial map of the Universe

Your mind creates constantly the reality you perceive. Our mind is not the real Universe, but the sounds and images we collect from it. To differentiate both we will call the vision of the Universe that humans have, thanks to their senses and minds, the “wor[l]d”. A World is a Mental world constructed observing the Universe with a language of time, n the case of man, Words, and a language of space, in the case of man, images. The mental world of man, is different from the mental world of other species which do not use words to explain temporally reality. For example machines use numbers to explain reality, dogs seems to use smells, as ants do… The Universe is the total reality, the world is the linguistic mirror that a mind of any perceptive species use to describe reality. To differentiate all those other maps of realities, made with smells such as those of dogs or ants, from the world made by man with words, and eyes, we call the World of Man, the Wor[l]d (world=word). Since it is a World in which our temporal perception of change, and the laws of survival and extinction that cause such change, takes place through words, that value reality.

I think therefore I am, define essentially man and only man as a word-speaking species Temporal words, are the particular linguistic mind of mankind. We could say that all humans are artists of the Wor[l]d, since all humans see and understand with words the Universe. What an artist does, however, is to go beyond that common wor[l]d, the biological wor[l]d of our senses, to stretch the limits of perception of human words and sight. Art in such a classic sense, adopted here, is the creation and evolution of the human mind made of images and verbal thought. I see and think therefore I am defines Man. I see more, I think more therefore I am an artist defines an artist as a more complex human mind.

That perception is evolved by the artist’s imagination into new forms, which return from the mind into reality in the shape of an artistic form, a “Work of Art”. A new verbal or visual form, becomes “real”, thanks to the use of certain materials, able to conform easily to the will and imagination of the artist, to become a work of art. Wood, stone, paint, metal, paper, allow the forms the artist has elaborated in his mind to become real, to become art. Thus, the artist is a sensitive man who “thinks more and sees more” and expresses his higher mental sensibility through his works of art. Such a theory of art developed by the Greeks and the Italian Renaissance, makes art a sacred endeavor, since art tries to expand the limits of human sensorial perception, in his perennial search for the truth and the essence of the Universe.

Out of all the human senses, why is it we highlight visual and verbal perception as the origin of art? In biological terms the answer is simple. Sound and sight offer much more information to the human mind than the other senses of touch, taste and smell do. Since the creation of art requires an initially rich sensorial evidence, only those senses can provide the perceptive material needed to create complex works of art. Art is therefore, first the evolution of our linguistic, verbal and visual perception of reality, and only in a secondary level, a product, a work of art for sale in the market.

The former explains why the Greeks considered philosophers, that only talked, and had no products on sale, the highest artists. Since they could combine words -the second level of the mind, that comments on what the sight sees- with such a beautiful logic, as to create new “wor[l]ds”, new linguistic images of reality, only with the power of the mind.

Images and words are the languages of creation of the human mind. They are like mirrors which show the Universe. However the mirror is not the Universe in itself, just an image of it. A linguistic mirror of reality. What you see is not reality, just the creation of your mind.

But all human minds have a genetic, basic way of creating the wor[l]d of sound as images, as all dogs smell and create a world of smells that probably is similar. What differences the artist is its capacity to distort, in several possible ways -what we call artistic styles- that basic biological mirror. He will be a verbal artist, when he makes descriptive models of the Universe with words. He will be a visual artist, when he creates sight-based models of that Universe.

Word Art and Sight Art. The eye-word, preceptor of space and time

It follows that there are two basic forms of “mind art”; Word and sound arts: music, and literature of any gender. And visual arts, architecture, painting, sculpture.

Why are images, and words the main sensorial languages of man? The answer is rather simple. We exist in time and space, the two parameters which define all species of the Universe. We therefore need to exist, survive and interpret such a Universe, a spatial and a temporal sense. The eye scans space. It is our spatial sense.The word remembers events in time. It is our temporal sense. So the eye-word are the human senses of perception of space and time, the main parameters of the Universe. This position places a special importance on the “higher arts”. It gives them a “sacred” meaning, since they deal with the very essence of mankind’s intelligence, our “soul,” which is our consciousness of space and time, of the Universe. The difference between both arts is in the senses which control the creation of the art form. Visual arts depend on spatial perception, through eye-images. Word art is “temporal art”, since man uses words and verbs to measure and explain events which happen in time. Verbs are the “temporal memory of man”, the “scanner of time” of the human mind.

We conclude that art is the highest expression of the human mind, in as much as it takes the mind of man into further evolution beyond its biological limits. The visual artist is the person able to see more and, with a higher sight, he is able to create images in two dimensions (painting) or 3 dimensions (architecture and sculpture). On the other hand, writers and musicians are able to think better in sounds; either in the simplified language of 8 sounds (music) or the more complex language of 24 sounds (words). They are able to explain emotions, sensations and temporal events with more complexity than ordinary people can, and with a higher sense of harmony, according to the natural laws of the Universe.

Mind-art, art of the human senses of space and time, the eye and the word, is clearly the highest level of knowledge man reaches about the Universe by his own linguistic means, with his soul-mind. In this manner, the wor[l]d becomes our soul-mind, the linguistic mirror that words and images craft on the Universe of atomic energy and information.

Even though man has 5 sensorial outlets to the Universe, it is important to distinguish between our “Energy senses” and “Informative senses”. The former might also evolve and create human goods to satisfy our perception (gastronomy, perfumes), but these can hardly inform us about the Universe, since their physiology allows them to accumulate only a small quantity of information. So they give way to simple sensorial objects. The Informative senses of the mind, eyes and words, accumulate thousands of times more information than the lower senses do. So they give birth to much more complex works of art. For that reason those works which relate to the higher senses of man are considered to be the classic arts in History.

However, in the present market-oriented society, the word “art” has been devaluated to allow the sale of many products which traders promote as art when they are mere crafts that do not evolve the human mind. This has an economic reason behind it; “a single genius is a single sale”. It is difficult to find enough truly creative works of art to invade the world market. Therefore the idea of converting any object into art and use the prestige of art to market industrial products, has expanded the notion of art beyond the products of the mind into many other things, from clothing to gastronomy, from images taken by machines to industrial design, of minimal creative content.

Man has existed for 150.000 years and he always considered art a sacred endeavor, and art works the most perfect or innovative forms perceived and recreated by the higher senses of the mind; words and images. Thus only products of “the eye-wor[l]d”, in its classical manifestations: literature, poetry, drama, prose, musical sounds, painting, sculpture and architecture, are considered art in this web. They are the seven arts of classical Greece, which the seven muses embodied.

The lower senses of man, those which have a limited perception of reality, (taste, touch, smell) blurred by the lack of distinct and clear information, create what we might call at best, lower art, forms of Human Goods, that should be promoted and reproduced as much as possible since they are truly the real wealth of nations, the goods mankind needs to survive: gastronomy, sex, textiles, perfumes… Yet precisely for that reason they cannot be unique, or special of a certain human mind, but common and available to all men, in a healthy body of history.

3-ages-of-art

The style of an artist, and the style of a society.

The present earth is changing from a historic ecosystem of human social organisms based in human beings, human goods, and human art into a single ecosystem ruled by metal organisms, networks, and financial systems, that we might call the metal-earth.

The main effect of that change is the increasing obsolescence of human art and human minds, submissive today to the industrial design of software for thinking machines.

However in the past, in the ecosystems-organisms of history that we have called nations and civilizations, words, legal systems and art were far more important, because they were the informative networks of societies. Verbal and visual knowledge and Art were the mind of civilizations as historic organisms, organized by legal information, and religion.

And so art, as the social networks of information of civilizations, was not so much an individual phenomena, but a collective phenomena. And the artist felt himself with a social role, as the neuronal cells, the informative organs of his society. It was for that reason the art of any artist was basically similar, to the art of all other artists of its society. It was “style-art”, because the style, was the collective message of a civilization. Today however, because civilizations are no longer ruled by human minds, but by networks of financial information, by company-mothers and its lobbies, by networks of metal-minds that produce information in industrial processes, the artist no longer has a social role of relevance. So he is free of any collective style. The style that controls ideas of artists, exists however in radios, televisions, internets, and all other forms of industrial information. A style which is controlled, and tailored to produce the basic message of industrial societies: men have as only purpose to work=reproduce machines, and test=consume them. Of course this message is presented with al the rhetoric of beauty, and freedom necessary to hide the fact, that work and consume are not acts that necessarily develop and increase the human sensorial Freedom, but basically evolve and multiply machines. Yet the message has reached so much sophistication, that most human beings today, believe that to be a worker and a consumer is the paramount Freedom of mankind; while to evolve human senses, and enjoy Human Goods, and the pleasures of human existence   is either a “sin”, an act of “laziness”, and “weakness” and a “lost of time”. The fact is that all top predators in the Universe, exist to be lazy, lions of the savanna, enjoying the basic pleasures of his organism, to reproduce (sex-love), to feed energy [food, movement], and to receive its natural information (verbal thought and visual beauty in the human case). That is, the ideals of society before the industrial revolution – the ideals of Renaissance, and the aristocracy, top predator caste of that age. And vice versa, and ideal world dedicated to the freedoms of machines, will imply that men-slaves of machines would dedicate their time to the reproduction of machines (work) its evolution (industrial research) and its vitalization as species in movement (consume of machines that vitalize their existence).

So it is evident that the Freedom of the market, the Freedom of the economy, is the Freedom of machines and its company-mothers. While the biological Freedom of the citizen, of the human being, were the ideals expressed by the art styles  of historic civilizations. Those facts have of course enormous historic relevance, and explain why under such brain-washing propaganda, the classic historic, social, religious art and his aesthetic and ethic ideas, clash so deeply with modern ideologies of economical men and yet they were accepted and enjoyed by the citizens of Historic civilizations. They found in the social ideas of religious art, and the sensorial ideals of individual art, the pursuit of their self-realization as individual, biological human beings, and as part of a macro-social organism, a culture, or civilization, that social art harmonized, as nervous messages harmonize social cells in a body.

In all those cultures art was sacred, art was considered the informative network of the Historic organism. Art caused the evolution of the collective human mind. Art was the mind of civilizations, and acted in the social historic organism, as the nervous networks act in the human organism.

Art the informative mind of the civilizations. The canon of ethics and aestehtics

3agesart

Since we have defined human art, as the visual and verbal perception olf space and time by the human ind, it fllows that collectiv e art was also visal and verbla rt, of colletive nature. And that collective nature imposed upon social art, two socila concepts: ethics and aesthetics of human nature. So classic art always had two basic forms, social ethic art, and individual aesthetic art, and two canons, moral, and beauty, carried by the word, and the eye of the human artist.

Today, even artists find those ideals, something of the past, because the artist today is not the valuator of reality, and has no ethic role. He does not educate the rest of the cells of society. So sacred art, religious art (which tried to create a social, harmonic morality among the different cells of society), even legal thought, has declined. Of course this has given individual Freedom to artists, to reflect their individual personality since nobody cares really anymore for what we, the artists, neurons of humanity, have to say.

Yet for most of history, Art has been a social phenomena, since men, lived in a social organism. The artist lived within a society. His ideas were similar to those of other artists of that society, fruit of customs and learning processes within that society. And so, the information that the mental cells of a civilization developed (the artistic information of a culture) was similar in most of the artists of a civilization. Styles in art gathered those similar mind-wor[l]ds, coming from people living in the same place, at the same time, as neurons work in the same manner, in the same organisms.

Individual art, the genius… and its relationship with social art

The style of an artist, is the peculiar way in which the mind of the artist, transforms the biological “Wor[l]d” of perception, that all humans have in common; the sounds and image we perceive as the Universe. While most people see reality under those biological limits, the artist goes beyond the subjective eye-Wor[l]d of the human species, and adds certain personal subjective changes to those images and words. This is the artist’s style.

The artist with his style goes beyond the “common way of perceiving reality”, and shows those other possible Worlds, that maybe some other species in some far away planet perceive directly (imagine a world where eyes see with the colors of a fauvist painter).

Still in the Earth, men see reality in a certain manner, and only artists are able to break with those conventions of the mind. Such individual artists are rightly called genius, since they create an entire new way of perception. When such new way of perception is meaningful, and harmonic, and can be understood at least partially by the audience, we have found an original artist.

Yet, in as much as men belong to social organisms, where they communicate in-form-ation to other human “cells” of the social organism, even individual genius, and its perception of reality, reproduces into works of art, that transmit the information to other “neurons” of the social organisms. In this manner, styles are transmitted, and create “schools” of art where many similar artist display the same style.

If the individual artist expresses its mind experience through its personal art, we can say that the society expresses its collective mind experience through schools of art.

If individual art is the evolution of the mental senses of the artist towards regions never explored by the common human mind, the style-art is the evolution of the collective mind of civilizations. It reflects the social mental state, of such civilization (as individual art reflects the mental state of the individual artist). In that sense, art becomes the collective mind of a civilization.

It is then clear that in classic history the role of artists was indeed sacred, fundamental, because verbal and visual artists, were in charge of recreating a Wor[l]d pleasant to man, where human social cells were in harmony, and shared as cells in any organism do, their vital information and energy. Ethic priests ruled the verbal minds of people with messages of love and ethics. Artists created beautiful environments, well constructed cities. Energy workers (farmers) fed the cells of the organisms. Literature educated the feelings of people, allowing bondage among individuals, at several levels (love, family, citizenship, religion). There was therefore a clear idea of what a social nation was, and what artists had to do in such society. That is why artists tried to find “canons” of beauty, that people would imitate, as role models.

The canons in classic art. What are ethics and aesthetics?

We can now understand the concept of a canon, both in verbal art (canon of ethics) and in visual art (canon of beauty). Today in individual art, when art is no longer the mind of civilizations, but science is, canons do not matter, but in the past, when art guided cultures, and took care of its survival and welfare, it was necessary and fundamental.

There was a canon of beauty in space, that had as element of reference the human form. Since we are humans, and we were top predators of the Earth, as all top predators do, we designed a Wor[l]d to our image and resemblance. So spatial arts, had as canon of beauty the proportions of human beings, and in its most beautiful creations (Greek, Italian art), that canon was respected, to create an environment in which man felt happy, in harmony with his surroundings, and dedicated to the pursuit of sensorial pleasure. This is the case of Greek and Renaissance sculpture and architecture.

There was also a canon of beauty in time, defined by the biological language of measure of time, that mankind uses: verbal thought.

How can we define beauty on time? It is self-evident, that if you ask anyone, what he would want to happen in time, he would say, “I want to survive”. So survival is indeed, the canon of beauty in time. And survival has in social thought a name: Ethics. Ethic societies that promote peace, and abhor war, do not die away. Societies that create systematically weapons end in civil wars, or in national wars. Thus, the people that were considered great artists of verbal thought in the past, were the prophets and writers that praised peace, and with poetic parables, preached the well being and harmony among human beings. Philosophy and religion were considered the highest forms of verbal thought. This, as we said no longer holds, since we are no longer ruled by words, but by numbers, by men, but by machines and prices. But we cannot ignore the fact that ethics and religious thought have controlled mankind. And the great artists of the word have been those prophets such as Jesus and Buddha, that talked against weapons and money, and praised love, and human senses. The artist is indeed the prophet, not the church, or the latter commentator. The master of the Word is Jesus, that defends a prostitute, and foresees that those “who kill by the sword, will die by the sword”, not the Catholic Church or Luther, and Calvin that acceptmoney and war, and repress sensorial love.

The quality of verbal art

As a consequence of the biological nature of languages, we cannot regard any longer verbal art, as a product, or a secondary commodity. “Literature for the sake of aesthetics; art for the sake of art” is far less relevant than “sacred art”, literature with an educational mission, either social literature and philosophy, or sensorial literature (fiction), which educates the senses and feelings of the people. There are qualities in the forms of literature, because literature has a function. Literature is not useless entertainment. Verbal Art is the biological language of mankind, and our societies. Its function is to mirror reality and explain the universe to man, from our own point of view, with the aim of helping human societies to survive. This means that we can qualify the quality of literature, according to such function.

It will be good literature, either legal, religious, fiction or logic literary art, a verbal construction that through its reading and practice, improves the capacity of an individual to behave ethically and in harmony with the other members of his society. It will be bad art, those literary and verbal forms that harm the harmony of societies.

So “War and Peace” is good art. So it is the “bill of rights” or the “Gospel”. They try to give the reader an “ethic sense of life” that favors peace over war; human rights over the rights of machines; and love and poverty, and despise for money and war, (the message of the gospel). Since history proves that those attitudes are positive for the survival of the individuals of society. On the other hand bad verbal art, is that art, which harms the energy and information of civilizations, pushing individuals against each other.

A typical script made in Hollywood that makes an apology of violence and murder is bad verbal art, regardless of its technological achievements. Its consequence is to multiply the use of weapons in our society, of technological species, that harm mankind.

The decalogue scripts of Polish director K. Kieslowski, are master pieces of filmed literature, despite its minimal technology because they make us reflect on the basic matters of love and life and death, far more important than the designed special effects of digital computers. A fascist law is also bad art. A religion which does not accept the equality of all men, a tribal religion of “chosen of God”, is also bad ethic verbal art. Since it allows war between tribes. Those facts are self-evident to any human being that thinks naturally about the purpose of art and verbal thought. They might collide with the “economic view”, that favors all forms of literature, specially those forms of literature, that multiply the use of machines, even weapons (economic and military nationalism, advertising, etc.)… according to the old lemma “you will defend me with your sword, and I will defend you with my word”.

Such art is considered here “rhetoric art”, bad literature, since its purpose is the opposite to the biological function of verbal thought. However in present societies most verbal art is rhetoric art, art that has neither a moral, ethic standing, or even any relationship with the reality of man as an individual or member of a human society. Why is that? Because words are no longer the language of information and power of our societies, a role that today belongs to money.

As a consequence, verbal thought is no longer the language of power, the sacred language, and it has no longer the role of guiding the survival of mankind. For that reason words enter in decadence, and loose “logic, realistic power”, becoming “fiction”, a language used to describe false realities. The value of things now is given by its price, not by its verbal meaning. And so mathematics describes reality, while words are used to describe fictions, and those realities of lesser power, such as the individual lives – no longer the social lives of people… Literature is now too often fiction, or science, or shallow I-literature, ego-trips and bio-pics of little relevance, or books on secondary senses and products (from gastronomy, to do-it-yourself manuals). Sacred literature has almost died away…

The function of visual art

What was the social role on that sacred view, of visual art? If we have considered verbal art, to be in charge of the temporal perception of a civilization, visual art, obviously will be in charge of the visual perception of such culture. Visual art therefore has also a human canon, an aesthetic, spatial canon, referred to the relative dimensions of man. If verbal art has to create temporal harmony among individuals, visual art has to create spatial harmony, beauty, in the space of that civilization.

Such is the classic vision of architecture and sculpture, urbanism and painting, even gardening, or agricultural development. All those arts that transform the space around us tried to create a harmonic environment in societies. And when both canons succeeded, we talk of a harmonic civilization in which ethics and aesthetics (the moral of the eye), favor a Wor[l]d built to the image and resemblance of mankind.

The function of art, is to shape the environment of man in a pleasant way. Yet since all measure in space and time is relative (Theory of Relativity), a pleasant space for man has the references of human size and form. To make of man the center of creation, the God of the Earth. This was understood perfectly by the theoretical minds of Renaissance, the last human culture, previous to the Industrial Revolution. The aim of renascence artists was to create ethics and aesthetics, for the Italian society. They worked hand in hand with the church in charge of the ethics of Christian societies. They tried to create “canons” of beauty as the gospel tried to create canons of ethics. They affirmed that men should try to achieve a mind and a body according to such canons. The artist, as the most complex mind of society, was the guide of the individual, which tried to achieve personal perfection as a human being, imitating those ethic and aesthetic roles, the artists showed him.

The destruction of the Renaissance caused by the evolution of gunpowder weapons, the creation of religions that worshipped money instead of words as the language of information of human societies (Calvinism, Anglicanism), and the beginning of science with its despise for human words and human eyes, meant the collapse of the artist as the guide of human societies.

The human paradise as the goal of history also was lost. A new culture, and a new civilization appeared, where the goal of history became the progress of the machine, and the human goal, the paradise of human senses, where “man is the measure of all things” was forgotten.

We are living the consequences of such mistake, in a world in which man no longer matters, where humans and words are submissive to mathematics and machines…

Yet only the best human minds, verbal priests, and social activists that follow the original ideas of his wor[l]d-masters, sensorial artists, that do not renounce to explore fully the human nature, and rebels of thought that do not accept the brain-washing of scientific myths, and market-propaganda, realize of the errors of our society.

The myth of superman

All this bring us to a final reflection on the nature of the Human Masters, the great artists of verbal and visual wor[l]ds that have confronted throughout History, the metal masters, warriors, traders and scientists that base their power, not in their own senses and biological nature, but in the power of energy-metal (lines of metal or weapons from swords to missiles, cycles of metal, ormoney, and metal-minds or scientific instruments).

Human Masters who “think more and see more”, are the true masters of mankind. Since mankind is a mental race -its body is not even the strongest of all carbolife species- and the master artist is the most developed human mental race, it is the artist, the “super-man”, not the warrior, or the scientist, that rely on weapons and metal-minds, to power up their bodies and minds. This was the vision of the Greek philosophers, and it is the biological truth. Hence, human masters, masters of the wor[l]d should rule human societies, as Plato wisely understood. They do not rule our societies, because warriors, traders and scientists, impose their power with the help of their metal and as a consequence, they also corrupt art, which becomes another ‘informative’ myth, used to glorify animetal castes in power.

Technological art: evolution of metal-minds.

What about modern technological art? It is obvious, and we treat the theme when studying metal-communicators, that modern art is rhetoric art to the service of power, of people-castes and corporations.

In that regard, both the software of modern technological art, merely visual, evident, and based in ‘motion’, which implies violence and ‘skin views’, which implies racism, and the hardware – the machine that evolves digital thought, are NOT forms of human art but ‘ab=use’ human memes degrading art, since the age of TV (film still kept due to the difficulty and inclusion of multiple arts a high quality of human sensorial memes, bust mostly at an emotional, already lowering scale of awareness):

Screen Shot 2016-03-30 at 12.54.37
In the graph, the fundamental equation of Historic regression to the past is caused by the parallel massive evolution of the machine, and its mental chips that atrophy and substitute mankind, as they create a global super organism at an accelerated speed.
This means paradoxically in the side of mankind an increasing devolution and destruction into a field of entropic disorder, from the heights of social evolution reached in the age of European r=evolution (from the XVIII enlightened age to the Russian R=evolution and isms, aborted by fascism, stalinism and capitalism, all working together against the memes of freedom and eusocial love, art and the understanding of mankind as the only ‘nation of the species’)…
So one of the lamentable facts of the 7 cultures of the world today is that they have stopped its evolution into a single global system, and are regressing to past memes, which a mere 30 years before the chip radiation started in earnest were dimmed as relics of the past, customs without more importance than to be an excuse to get together and conserve art and architecture (religious ceremonies, conserved as an empty carcass of a bygone previous phase of the eusocial evolution of man).
So as we study the 7 cultures of mankind and its collective minds, we will also study the negative side of them, the animetal part of the cultures that are fighting and winning in the process of degeneration of all those cultures. In the next ultra-repeated graph we can see above the origin of the 7 cultures of mankind in its positive and negative sides.
Equalization, hypnosis and degradation of human time.
In terms of human time existence, the fundamental property of those globalised trends of digital mass art, except the work of a few isolated artists, has a meaning: to maintain the increasingly obsolete human mind-species in a state of passive acceptance of the system, misusing its life in a lethargic state that with the arrival of violent video-games and 3D Virtual hypnotic fictions will render humans totally atrophied in its capacity to react against the system and its growing obsolescence to machines:

Screen Shot 2016-07-09 at 01.05.15

The graph from the 92 book ‘the extinction of man’, shows truly what fiction means, the extinction in life of most of the active existence of human beings hypnotised by screens that deactivate their eusocial love with selfish messages – you kill for money resumes the meaning of most telefilms, and instil the animetal idol-ogies of the system, mechanism, abrahamic cults, nationalism and worship of money.

Now this trend has extended in the process, of ‘murdering’ of art by markets and Warhol-style propaganda and advertising art. So the process of death of visual art is really advanced.

And what is more telling, as the price of trash-art, Warhol industrial mechanical posters, overcomes that of the best eclectic artist of the post-photograph age of inward, baroque informative eclectic art, Mr. Picasso, we can be sure that not even ‘critiques’ and collectors do understand the meaning of human sacred art.

art modern

In the graph, the last age of human art, was the eclectic, inward, informative 3rd age of human I=eye Wor(l)ds, which peaked with Picasso destruction of the outer world forms of the visual eye, improved by machines, by the internal mind ‘ I paint thoughts’ he said.

After that, there was a long silence broke by the hijacking of art by industrial systems of reproduction of photographs, which plagued the American post- Pollock/Hooper, non-artistic age of ‘Fakes’, perfectly described by Orson Welles, in his film on art markets. Warhol and his series of audiovisual, mechanical artists, with minimal human information (The Beatles copying Beethoven chords and put silly simple words, such as ‘I love you’, in every other word), shows clearly that art started with the arrival of audiovisual media a massive simplification previous to the present degeneration of art into electronic music, repetitive beats and minimalist thought.

Craft still exists.

So the best art today is either happening in 3rd world societies (as the Dakkar biennale shows) or in the regression to simple crafts, which have more value than a Wharhol poster. It is a root grass movement of normal people doing good imitative art, given the fact that the search for sacred art and humanist art is exhausted, and the role models of society are ‘eviL people’, intensely fighting for the destruction of all human values, pursuing those digital values of the ‘language of money’ that treat men as object.

Evilwood is NOT art, trust me. I arrived there with Mr. Pitt and Mr. Mandel, actor and producer, and a script hired to write for them and stay around for a decade. In a perfect world, Hollywood would be a holly-sacred place of astounding artistic films enhancing the nature of mankind, and a bigger number of documentary pieces.

As it is today is just the idol-ogical branch of the FMasters and the Military-Industrial Globalized Complex of corporations.

How can we classify the third type of products that the market today sells as “art”, and are neither Human Goods, not Human evolutionary visual/verbal art?

They are either crafts and industrial designs that use forms of energy and information of minimal complexity, (geometrical cycles and lines) easy to be mass-produced, with machines. They are also creative forms, such as photographs or computer art, which are new, evolved images that seem to have the characteristics of sacred art, yet lack the fundamental element of human art: the human mind is not the main creator of those forms, but a machine, a “metal-head” is. That is they are metal-mind art, the art of machines, the art of science…

In that sense we have to differentiate the human method of verbal/visual knowledge, the art of the human mind, that uses words and eyes to understand the Universe, with the method of knowledge that animetal scientists use to perceive the universe of space and time: the scientific method.

If both art and science search for knowledge of space and time, then what is the main difference between the two of them? The difference is radical, when we realize that art and science use different sensorial instruments of perception to search for that knowledge. Art uses the biological organs of mankind to understand space and time. The word, our biological language that measures time, is used in art to express thoughts and ideas about the passing of time, and its 3 dimensions, past, present and future, which verbs mirror with its 3 temporal forms. The eye, our biological organ of perception of space, is used in art to define our understanding of the three dimensions of spatial reality, width, length and depth (created in 2-dimensional painting with perspective or cubist deformation).

On the other hand, science uses sensorial organs which are not human organs, but machines, made basically of another type of atoms, metal. So we can baptize the organs of perception of science, “metal-minds”. They are “metal-sensorial organs”, machines that perceive time (clocks and computers) and machines that perceive space (telescopes, microscopes, cameras).

We could say that art is knowledge through human senses, and science is knowledge through metallic senses. It follows that arts evolve the human perception of the universe, while science evolves the perception of machines. And so, thanks to science, the primitive systems of temporal perception of machines (the clocks of Mr. Galileo) have become computers. And the primitive first “metal-eyes” of Mr. Galileo, founder of modern science (his telescopes), have become today the sophisticated cameras we see all around us.

If we are strict in our classic, biological definition of art, the languages and images which cannot be reproduced by human minds and humans hands are not human art. So science and its machines does not produce human art. Please leave aside your western ideologies that worship machines, and consider machines abstract species. Technological art is not “a creation of the human mind”, but of a “metal-mind”. And the role of man in its creation will always be secondary to the role of the machine.

If in a painting, the canvas is the passive element, and the painter the active element, in a computer-designed art form, or a photography, the human mind plays the role of the passive “canvas” adapting his style to the properties of the machine. And the active creator is the machine, which imposes his language to the “craftsman”.

So we have to be much more exigent with technological crafts to consider them a form of human art. Only those forms of technological art focused in the human experience, that require a lot of human creativity (such as “art films”, or some photographic work by masters like Cartier or Capra), can be seriously consider a technological form of human art.

The other forms of technological crafts, specially those created with computers, or related to mere mathematical, and digital shapes, belong to the “lower arts”. We call them crafts because their human content is minimal. To disguise those obvious truths, the technological artist rhetorizes his work and markets it with arrogant statements to make-belief that he is the only artist, and the machine a mere extension of his mind, not a metal-mind with his own linguistic properties (the language is the message).

That anthropocentric concept of technological art, might be true, of art made with “primitive metal-minds” (classic film-making). Yet the arrival of computers and special effects gives predominance to the machine over the human manipulator. So today Hollywood films are made by computers, according to the computer and metal-eye properties that seek higher movement and hence violence, brutality with the human body, and distortion of human feelings with dramatic effects. They are genres imposed by the machine not by the artist.

Today the arrogance of the animetal artist grows as his role in the act of creation diminishes. So we can hear sentences, such as those of a well-known Asian video artist, that considers his last work of electronic distortions, his entering on “a sublime period, like the great French gothic cathedrals”. Or the sentences of a well-known computer mogul, that considers the 010011 crunching of his software programs, “a form of creative art, like anything the great masters have ever done”. Or the evil=anti-live sentences of the father of robotics, that says he wants to play god, and construct a species superior to the human mind…

In technological crafts as in market-art, rhetoric and the cult to the machine, takes over real human creativity. Animetals can occupy their creativity in whatever they want, specially when they pursuit money and fame, which are market-oriented concepts, but we cannot pretend to make Leonardos of Animetals, children of human thought, working with Basic, Adobe Photoshop, or a video-monitor… to the risk of loosing any perspective on the nature of our human mind, and the importance that human art has to develop the human soul, our sense of ethics and aesthetics, in freedom of thought.

complex version: hierarchical i-scalesA more complex view.

A more detached view though is the higher perspective of the laws of the bio-ethic laws of the organic Universe, a level of comprehension I rarely bring to this web, as it might seem ‘too far out’ for those who ignore all about General Systems Sciences. Yet it is necessary to understand the perfect man to compare and put into perspective each of our souls and that of those we observe riding us with the 4 apocalypse horses (myths are always metaphors of higher truths which give a poetic perspective)…

So let us try… The Universe is a ‘System’ made of organisms of energy and information, from physical systems, made of an informative particle moved over a body/field of energy, to human beings, made of informative heads moved by energetic bodies, to societies ruled by a neuronal class in control of our languages of social power, (money and words, and its submissive energetic language of weapons which money and words always command), which direct a body mass of working middle classes…

This must be understood – the pantheist universe constructs its ultimate laws of science and all its sub-sets of beings, made to the image and likeness of the whole departing from that simple duality.

And so to survive it selects those entities with a more perfect ‘body’ of maximal energy, brain of maximal information and the system that maximizes both, Max. E x Max. I, which mathematically happens when E=I  (so for a total of 10, 5×5=25 > 6×4=24>7×3=21, etc.)

Now departing from those laws of General Systems, applied to human beings, there is a potential perfect man,  which maximizes those 3 survival functions:

– A man of maximal Bravery; Max. E, or mental energy to challenge the wrongs of life by applying its Intelligence (max. Information), to create an ethic and aesthetic balance (E=I), between truth (Max. Information) and Happiness (Max. strength) – yes, good people who help others have been proved by experiments to be happier, to emit more oxytocin, the drug of love and happiness). 

This simple function: Max. E -> Max. I -> Max E=I, defines the survival species of reality creating a perfect world of maximal ethics and beauty, the canon of being human (which we observe in ‘classic forms’ of aesthetics and ethics, that is of art and literature, with balance between energy and form, or in the 2nd age of maturity of any entity).

Now this simple function is broken, because E=I, ethics and aesthetics of human origin have been SUBSTITUTED by the ethics and aesthetics of the machine that destroy our collective social, ethic mind.

Thus the function of bio-ethics, of a human civilization based in the values of man, which is explained all the ‘messages’ of all the prophets of history worth to mention is now gone. But that does not mean that the search for human beauty and ethics, the natural goal of our species is not truth. It is and it will always be. So there will always be as long as humans exist in the past, present and future among the highest minds those who seek to define and practice the conduct of the perfect man, guided by the survival balance and sense of justice of the Universe, represented in our species by human ethics and aesthetics, E=I:

For example in Plato is the ‘idea of man’, the ideal man which is our potential perfect man, of which each of us, is a mere shadow, reflection in the ‘cave’, parable of the Mind of God, the Logos, or rational laws of the Universe, of that perfect man. Socrates expressed it also with its life and dictum that ‘an intelligent man (max. I) can only be a good man (E=I)’

In non corrupted Abrahamic Religions, he is the prophet, the canon of which all of us must be a reflection, trying to achieve his perfection.  This was better expressed in the great philosophers of the first age of christianity before ‘animetal cultures’ of gold and weapons degraded this religion, from Orestes to Saint Augustine, in its ‘citadel’. Here the function most cherished is E=I (Ethics).

It was expressed from Confucius (Jen Man) and Mo-Ti to Buddha in all the Eastern religions. And here as in Plato we find a close description of this Jen/Buddha man, in its 3 functions (the right fold path)

It will be again expressed by neo-platonic renaissance which stressed the 3rd final function of balance and beauty, as the Greek-Latins did (mens sana in corpore sanum).

It was NOT, expressed, contrary to belief in most prophets of the Jewish-Protestant culture,  since the Old testament is hihgly polluted by selfish tribal memes of go(l)d and war; but Moses and other prophets of the Isaiah cycle brought us the closest image of it.

So we had to wait till the French-American R=evolution and all those who imitated those Founding Fathers of modern ethics (including the marxist r=evolutionary man).

And so the Ideal, Canonical, Rightful, R=evolutionary ‘Perfect’ man exists at least in the mind of the poets of love that use the ethics of the wor(l)d to guide and create by imitation and right action, a critical mass of perfect men.

On that view modern humans and their animetal, mechanical cultures must be qualified as the Imperfect men, hence once that will not survive, because the Universe is perfect and only selects those perfect species who are made to the image and likeness of its logos, that a few of those men we quoted understood, because they had in themselves the seeds of the perfect man.

But the Universe and its selective system is both deterministic (as there are rules and laws that define what survives in the future) but also probabilistic (as a perfect universe should even forgive those who are imperfect, yet allowing them also a minimal probability of existence; hence most men are born potentially perfect, good Rousseaunian savages).

We are in that ‘Sigma 2’ using again mathematical terms of the more complex level of equations of bio-history (that dream of Asimov, which I resolved two decades ago and have seen unfolding every time ever since).

That is, we are the tail of the imperfect man, a planet with no critical mass of ethics, inteligence and aesthetics.

THE CULTURAL MIND.

MY MIND

My mind.

MY MIND IS obviously this blog And this blog  is the organic Universe in a nutshell. So why my mind has found all this? The answer is of course that my mind is part of the culture I belong to as I have shown in the previous graphs.

And so which is this mind is obvious – the organic mind of the 2 cultures that most influenced me, the mediterranean culture and the taoist, Chinese culture, which I learned in my youth travels in indochina.

BUT THIS IS not the mind of most humans today, which we must regard, as ‘technological minds’ or ‘enzymen’, whose real job for very long has been rather making machines.

So the duality of Human historic vs. Animetal minds run very deep in this blog as they explain the paradox of history, observed in the next graph:

 

THE HOMUNCULUS MIND – ANIMETALS.

And so I started to see humans as ‘homunculus ants’ perfectly programmed with its big mouths, bit hands and peanut brains to do only machines, measure things, plug data into computers and talk with their big mouths and peanut brains about how astonishingly superior, intelligent above heavens and earth their ‘egos’ are… And SO my response was dual – on the side of my relationship with other humans I became very arrogant and indifferent, closing for very long all intellectual communication with them; on the side of the Universe I went  further into the taoist, humble realization we were nothing but dust of space-time. You can call it a ‘bipolar reaction’, to the Homunculus which WRONGLY despises the Universe and thinks is above it, and to the Universe, who despises the Homunculus, rightly and as it IS above it, it is going to crunch it soon and throw it to the garbage of history, as soon as AI and robots take over…  Hence other name for this bipolar theory:

 

Absolute relativity.

Regardless of the fact nobody cares, and likely is just a distorted mirror on the absolute information the universe holds on itself, I repeat to the homunculus which should by now abandon the web offended (: what I have written in a very resumed form is the biggest advance on philosophy of science since Galileo discovered the mechanical method, added to the experimental method of Aristotle, the power of sensorial machines to perceive the Universe – along the development of mathematical tools more proper to mirror the measures of machines; in as much as it adds the organic elements of the Universe to the mixture, giving a much more rounded meaning to the different species of science, and completing the understanding of time and space.

So you might wonder why nobody cares about it. Of course I do also wonder after decades of having discovered the 5th dimensional Universe and tried – intermittently – to give it to the scholar world. Oh, yes, we know the explanations – the nature of scientific r=evolutions (Kuhn), the relatively artist nature of lonely researchers, etc. But the fact remains to put it in common language, that NO HUMAN I have ever met gives a FUK about the most astounding explanation of the meaning of existence, the ultimate question ANY RATIONAL, humble, INTELLIGENT MIND SHOULD CARE. Nobody, None, Nope, zero.

So after the permanent depression in which that realization throw me decades ago with 173 rejections to my earlier self-printed book on the matter, ‘the error of Einstein’… besides becoming a lost soul, now sick and tired, hoping at least to leave a trace of all this in http://www.unificationtheory.com – the mnemonic name for this web…

I had obviously to take two paths, either reject my work, which I did for 2 decades, caring nothing about it, going intermittently into social activism, sex, drugs and R&R and dolce fare niente, I obviously changed my view on humans as rational, intelligent beings and developed the whole model of history and memetics, which came to account for the extraordinary limits of humanity in all what concerns and compares with the extraordinary intelligence of the Universe, except for an obvious feature – the astounding arrogance and sense of self-entitlement of the species, which knows NOTHING and thinks it knows EVERYTHING… not to speak of its morality, thinking the individual particle not the network is the protagonist of history; or its religions where he is the center of the Universe, or its chosen one, or the only intelligence.

All this is garbage. Humans are nothing. We are all dust of space-time and the only remarkable intelligence is that of the Universe itself:

‘2 things I deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man, and I am not sure of the latter’ Einstein, one of the few exceptions that confirm the rule.

To be frank for quite long now I have not considered my mind belonging to the humind species. Its logic is No longer Aristotelian, of a single arrow causality; its geometry is Not euclidean, its ethics is NOT individualistic, its interest is not in other humans but in the TAO of nature. But that gives me the sole objective capacity to judge humans and do social sciences too. So let us start with the obvious – why huminds (ab. human mind) don’t give a FUK about reality as IT IS.

We humans have a defect so obvious that when we liked religions it became the original capital sin – arrogance. We really think we are a unique species, and our intelligence can only compare to that of God. The paradox of the ego is easy to understand in rational terms, when we know what minds do: to stop reality into a still linguistic image of the Universe (visual, verbal, mathematical) in which we see ONLY the language not the universe in its infinite size and motion.

In the human case that mind has 2 fundamental languages of space and time the ultimate substances of reality:

Visual images, and its geometric mathematical simplification which describe space.

And temporal verbs, words and its simplification, logic.

So the human mind is an I=eye (space language)>wor(l)d (time language), which measures space with visual eyes and time with verbal words. And its formal languages, mirrors of the spacetime Universe, are mathematics and logic.

This a priori linguistic ‘screen’ between the limited information of the mind and the ∞ Uni verse is what cause our paradox of the ego who thinks to be infinite. So we can write an ‘equation of the linguistic mind’ that defines the ego paradox: 0 x ∞ = Constant. Indeed, in terms of the mind the ‘limiting equation’ of algebra writes:

O: Infinitesimal self centered mind languages x ∞ time space cycles (Universe) = Constant still mapping of the world.

So the infinitesimal mind confuses the infinite Universe with its linguistic image or ‘WORLD’, which is one for each infinitesimal mind – ‘each point has a world in itself’, said Leibniz. But as we think our mind-world IS the Universe and our mind world makes OUR NOSE bigger than Andromeda, we are built up to have a HUGE EGO, distort reality and DENY organic, living properties to the rest of the moving, temporal Universe we ‘stop’ on our mind. So the Earth moves but we see it still. The earth is NOT the center of the Universe but we feel it is the center and so on.

So even before we start talking, if you can’t swallow that pill and realize that your ego cheats you into thinking you are the center; but in objective science, you are nothing but dust of space-time, we cannot make science. Since the problems of the ego do NOT solve with reason. As it is about being happy not finding truths.

Science is NOT happy – the reinforcing program of the ego, but objective and has the advantage that it ‘exists’. The ego, and the mind-world does NOT. It is a mathematical infinitesimal, a ‘zero’. And to fit all in a zero, everything is still in the mind because the kills its motion to focus on what is interesting for your survival – food moving, other humans who are ‘so important’ as you, etc. BUT science tells us we are only dust of space-time, like everything else in the organic Universe, where all is relative, nothing matters more.

And so what science tell us is that man HAS No importance in the Universe, as we are neither its center in space, or time or even scale, the last discovery of ‘absolute relativity’:

 In the graph, the fundamental characteristic of reality is its Absolute relativity, without preferential position, form or scale of size; as we are all Organic Points of space-time.
So science has been always an objective struggle against the never-dying subjective happiness of humans wanting to be the center of the Universe. First the absolute center chosen by the creator (Abrahamic religions). Then the center of space (earth-centric astronomy). Next the creator of the languages of the Universe (Pythagorean, quantum religions). And yet, none of those subjective truths is real. We have no immortal form in time, as evolution proved. We are not created with any special role. We are ‘a rock lost in a corner of the infinite cosmos, and departing from those facts we can talk about man’ (Schopenhauer) and of lately quantum realism proves that the Universe is real not a mathematical construct of the quantum observer. Finally the organic, fractal nature of reality makes no scale preferential.
But most humans still find some excuse to consider themselves ethnocentric, egocentric, earthcentric, timecentric and scalecentric.
In that sense,  the attitude of mankind respect to the much more intelligent, densely informative and complex Universe, which becomes ‘reduced’ to the human selfish perspective, without much ado – always in its center, first of location, then of evolution, now of ‘intelligence’… has a rational explanation – the paradox of the ego –  and its the biggest handicap for a scientific evolution of humind’s (ab. human mind=world) knowledge. to adapt our ‘limited world’ to the larger laws of the fractal organic Universe, the only possible philosophy of science.

Since only an organism is self-generated and does not need a god-maker to put the machine at work; so the alternative ‘mechanist theory’ of science, in place since Kepler’s huge ego-trip, a mixture of Biblical creationism and physicists’ mechanism, so obvious in the big-bang theory of a Universe born of a huge explosion from an infinitesimal mind-dot, is NOT science BUT A CLEVER modern form of religion.

Indeed, all abstract mechanist theories of the Universe are hidden deist religious theories, which need a maker to exist – and data as we show in our articles on the big-bang is subtly chosen and bent to cater to that ‘dogma’. Point.

 

WORLD-$TOCK – MIND OF METALEARTH

 The stock-market, financial brain of the super-organism of the Metal-earth.

Let us  consider an overview of the organic structure of the Financial complex as an organism independent of man, with a financial/informative brain which processes with monetary flows the information about the components of the organism, selecting the species of machines and other metal-memes it will reproduce, those that will become extinct and which corporations will receive further ‘monetary energy to continue its re=productive tasks. In the graph, today most of the computer power of the world is in the hands of companies and financial systems, organized by those who control the stock markets. In the graph, Stocks help the self-integration of the metal reproductive ecosystem, beyond the restrictions of the human mind. Artificial Intelligence is not a copy of human intelligence. It is an adaptation of the functions of nervous thought, of the human mind to different kinds of machines. Artificial Intelligence is born in companies as an internal brain that directs the body of the economic organism.

The homology between stock markets and brains or DNA systems is based in the bio-logical nature of economies, and company-mothers.

The graph describes the basic energy-information networks of Bio-economies ruled by stock-money. Stock holds, as brains do, most of the ‘code-language of information’ of the ecosystem. The brain will use that code to produce certain carbohydrates which are useful to the cell.

Stock has license to print money and will allocate them to the mother-companies of new technology with maximal price (weapons) of maximal reproductive power=Max. sales = Max. profits, such as digital software or maximal volume (energy).

Thus in this manner stock-markets express with money the arrow of evolution of the super-organism of machines, expanding its energy/information neetworks, its informative, audiovisual machines, its reproductive systems and its weapons.

On the other hand, human goods require human work, have minimal price by lack of affinity with metal-money values and are perishable, produce lesser monetary profits and are scorned by stock-speculators, which give no credit to all the products that could create a sustainable world.

In this manner the stock-market constantly deviates the wealth of humankind towards the reproduction and evolution of the memes of metal and the small elite of mechanist scientists, capitalist bankers/economists and corporation of machines, which during this age of crisis have further enlarged the gap between the FMI elite and the rest of the humankind. Yet because economic experts work for the FMI and have as dogma that the evolution of machines is the future of mankind, there is no criticism against policies, which are ‘de facto’ extinguishing this planet.

This was in the first age of the FMI complex carried about by human networks of traders/bankers, military people and scientists. In the next graph we can see the ‘historic age’ of human networks of traders and stockrats, or capitalist/religious age, when the Jewish-Protestant empire was created:

40-BIOECONOMIC-CONQEST-1024x770

In the graph, the globalization of the Financial system, in which the stock-market invents money for free first as stock-paper then as ticker money and finally as electronic money, departing from Holland, the 1st ‘biblical corporative’ cult(ure), mother of the FMMI system that today rules the world. Since even if in other countries the structure of the Financial-Media system is not so clear, with the globalization of the world, the entire planet by imitation or alliance are ruled by the American Financial-Media system, except the Chinese block and to a certain extent its allies or those cultures who are opposed to America, Russia and Islamic and African nations are not totally ‘owned’ and brain-washed by American media.

Then those processes became integrated in corporations of scientific machines and weapons, ruled by paper-money. Yet humans were still in charge, albeit slaves of their mechanist, capitalist and nationalist ideologies. Today the process is being transferred to all type of software programs, networks of machines, automated systems of reproduction and enhanced by the last ‘batch’ of ideologies of technology (productivity, ‘just wars’, mechanist science).

The end of the process is obvious: once all biological process of evolution and reproduction of the FMI system are transferred into software, the Metal-earth will be born.

Politicians do not understand that the stock-market and the human economy are different systems. The 1st is based in flows of electronic money, the 2nd in printed currencies. What the present explosion of electronic money derivatives is doing is deviating massively wealth from the human economy to the economy of corporations and paper-money. The inflated value of corporations and networks of information of the FMI-metal system and the chronic undervaluation of human goods and salaries is neither just from a human p.o.v. nor should be tolerated in democracies, but it is happening because the FMI complex has always predated over the human, life-based agricultural world.

Today it is not as obvious as when kings and tax-collectors exploited directly people, but the process is essentially the same: money is invented as e-data very easily in markets, through speculation and financial derivatives. While people receive printed money which grows far slower. So the wealth of corporations and bankers multiplies geometrically and the wealth of the human ecosystem of life goods arithmetically. In the past 30 years stock-markets have multiplied for 100 the value of stocks and derivatives, provoking a massive inflation in all human goods, while salaries have merely increased in a 1 to 10 scale. The result is like a parasite that were absorbing the blood of the human super-organism, provoking the endemic scarcity of human goods and poverty of the human mass.

For that reason the only possible reversal of that process would be the nationalization of the entire financial Industry, the creation of massive deficits in printed money, achieved with the creation of a global currency, ¥€$ money, fusioning yuans, yens, euros and dollars, and a 30% annual deficit by governments. This quantity of money similar to the quantity of money corporations add for free to their valuations through speculative markets of invention of e-money would allow the creation of a global minimal salary to jack up demand in basic human goods consumed by the poor and the inversion in projects that create a sustainable world (clean energies, infrastructures, education, public transport, tourism).

This economic measure coupled with a military reduction of budgets and expansion of UNO and EU like organizations and diplomatic forums, and/or a triad of EU-US-Chinese leadership, applying the science of bio-history to the design of an efficient superorganism of mankind in control of the FMI complex could halt the self-suicidal path in which mankind has entered, by trusting blindly without any understanding the evolutionary process of machines, weapons and money, we call ‘the free market’. Yet the free market is not free, it is an evolving complex system that preys on Gaia, life beings and the 90% of human beings, who do not profit directly from the sale of weapons and the invention of e-money in stock markets that have made corporations the dominant institution of the world with enough credit to cre(dit)ate a world to the image and likeness of machines.

In the 3 technological cycles, NYSE’s curve of machine’s stock population follows the same chair-like curves of biological populations; since each machine is a biological organism that finds ‘econiches’ in war and labor fields, substituting and consuming its rival human beings, workers and soldiers or as consumption machines, when they are consumed by humans to enhance our energy/information skills.

 

If we treat machines as collective species, analyzing their global population through the stock price of their company mothers, those graphs are self-similar to the Volterra curves of re=production and extinction of  any living species. Since for companies a population of machines means an amount of sales and profits that determine their stock price. Thus:

Stock-prices=sale-profits=re-production of machines.

Thus, the biological stock-curve that shows the reproduction and extinction of machines is its company’s sales or profit curve, directly proportional to the value curve of the company and the population curve of the ‘species’ of machines is that of its industrial sector in the stock market.  The graph compares those 2 curves for electronic machines and its 3 phases:

—     For a long period the machine (or species) evolves slowly in the labs of companies or inventors. It is equivalent to the slow period of mutations that will bring a new species into being (allopatric evolution)..

Then, the machine matures and its costs of reproduction plummet. The machine now occupies an econiche in the human world, substituting a certain human organic function, and consumers multiplt its sales exponentially. It is the takeoff of the machine. Since it starts from a very low population, prices now multiply very fast, so investors make the highest profits.

—     Yet, sooner than later, given their exponential rhythm of production, far superior to the increase of human population, machines saturate the consumer market. Since symbiotic species depend on the population of the species they associate to those machines are organic enhancers of our energetic or informative power, the ‘vital space’ of machines is the total human population with resources to buy them. Thus, once the machine saturates the ecosystem of mankind, if re=production continues, profits and sales diminish and companies accumulate inventories. At that point their sales and stock market curves decline. Again in Nature, one species that has overpopulated its vital space, suffers a population crash, as it has also depleted its ‘preys’ and cannot longer feed itself. The population finally reaches a balance with their prey and it becomes stable. So happens with stock-market curves of machines that become flat.

At this point in Nature a species cannot increase its population unless it mutates into a new, more efficient species that can feed on new preys. That is exactly what happens to the machine: After the overpopulation crisis, the machine mutates into a weapon and continues expanding its ecosystem, preying over human beings, no longer symbiotic to them.

– It is the third age or military age of the machine that is used now for war. So the trains of the Age of machine bodies become armored trains and colonialism becomes the ideology of the XIX c., the cars of the 29 crash become tanks and Hitler uses them to conquer Europe an the pcs of the American age become predators in a new age of colonialism against the poor. Again what matters is not the ‘memetic ideologies of the FMI complex’ that convince a certain nation to use those weapons, but the fact that those wars keep evolving the FMI complex and destroying the world of Gaia and non-technological cultures.

Unfortunately the same companies that make machines make weapons so their lobbies merely back military politicos and corrupted governments enter the game. Now the cycle of economic growth is based on Keynesian militarism: weapons are bought and death begins. Since weapons destroy themselves quickly in the battle front and must be renewed, the increasing demand of machines multiplies the benefits of companies. G.M. multiplied by 8 its profits, making tanks in W.W. II. So war becomes the economic engine of the last 36 year period, a Kondratieff cycle.

Company-mothers govern the world with a single aim: to re=produce machines. Among them, the most powerful ones reproduce top predator weapons. So, in as much as we can analyze company-mothers as reproductive organisms with biological cycles, called business cycles, we can find out, studying those reproductive cycles of machines, specifically of weapons, when there will be enough top predator weapons re=produced in our ecosystem, to cause war.

Modern wars are economic processes, embedded in the very same structure of ‘monetary and machine reproduction’. Indeed, the evolution of technology makes each new lethal machine much more efficient killing humans, there is also a progression in the number of casualties that each World War causes; which can be directly related to the growth of the stock-market that shows the price-quality of both, consumption machines and weapons; since in war ages ALL the machines of the system are weapons and the market reaches its maximal value. Yet since weapons consume human beings there is a parallel progress on the value of stock-markets that 100-fold each cycle of evolution of machines and the number of causalities in war that 100-fold each cycle. The progression, as most evolutionary increases of power in the Universe, is decametric: in each new World War, 102 times as many people die than in the previous one: 600.000 died in the Railroad wars at the end of the I Kondratieff cycle. 60 million people died in W.W. II. In the next cycle of war, the Age of the Singularity, when the first self-reproductive nano-robots, or the Final Weapon, the black hole of the Nuclear Industry appears at CERN, 6000 million, the entire human population, might die.

3. The overproduction age of chips that expel us from labor and war fields.

z-b

In the graph, from an old book (the extinction of man, 92), when i used the ‘hard language’ of mathematical space-time vectors to describe the FMMI superorganism we can see how worldstock in its western section, Wall street, acts as the ‘informative black hole’ of the Metal-Earth controlling with flows of money the 3 sub-vectors of:

– Energetic machines (weapons-transports) with center in Detroit.

– Informative machines (blue), with center in the West coast.

The graph highlighted what were at the time the leading 3 sub-corporations of each sector, as systems always end up having 3 top sub-systems specialized in energy, information and reproduction.

The human factor, the A-merican, Aristotelian believer was considered irrelevant as he will always follow under its go(l)d religions (jewish-protestant religions mathematized by classic economists) that he must obey his single Go(L)d, without understanding it (‘people must be kept ignorant to remain obedient’ said calvin…

3 crisis

Now we can return to the initial graph of this section that describe the overproduction phase of chips, the age of the FMMI superorganism in which we live.

In essence, the recurrent long terms, 72 year crisis of the economy go through the same phases.  The phase that now starts is the ruin of the different demand-based  welfare states of the economy which no longer has a viable credit system to support a sustainable growth.

In the 20s the currency crisis peaked in Germany during the hyper-inflation age.

Now again the crisis has started in Europe and Germany with its null understanding of ‘human values’ and the needs of people have triggered it with extreme capitalist, anti-deficit laws that forbid the creation of demand-based government deficits to create a new deal that solved the stagnation of the economy.

Yet in the present cycle America plays the role of Germany and China the role of America. Thus what we have seen in Greece is only the beginning. The true currency crisis will take place when the Yuan becomes convertible and the entire planet ditches the dollar as the international currency as it happened in the 1920s when it substituted the Deutsche Mark and the Pound for the dollar. Then America will suffer an age of hyper-inflation, lost of purchase power, as the trillions of dollars created by the Treasury return home, multiplying the quantity of money inside the states that will loose value; and the market panic ditches Treasuries for Chinese money and bonds.

And yet ignorant of the basic laws of the economic ecosystem, our ‘Treasure department’ insists that China makes the Yuan convertible and rises its value, in a self-suicidal process that will bring in the late 2010s the decline of America as economical power, and an internal social and political crisis, seen in the past cycles, when a nation looses its top predator status, with an international currency that always has unlimited rights to invent money for free.

Indeed, when Spain lost that right to Holland and the bullion plummeted in value it entered in a civil war (1640). When France lost that status at the end of the Indian/American wars in the 1750s it soon entered into the French R=evolution. And when Germany lost that status, Hitler raised to power.

Thus we are moving as it happened after the 1857, 1929 and 2001 crash, into an age of war for profits, with any ideological excuse. After the 1857 crash, trains were armored and used in wars against Indians or to conquer Africa. After the 1929 crash Hitler started the reproduction of tanks instead of cars.

This situation which parallels that of the 30s during the Republican administration (Mr. Obama and the Euro-zone presidents are in economical terms to the right of Coolidge) implies that we do not longer live in a Democracy but in a plutocracy, where companies and their owners stockrats have the exclusive rights to print the language of power, money, as aristocrats had the exclusive rights to bear arms in kingdoms. And for that reason, because consumption of peaceful machines has plummeted companies promote the creation of weapons and war that keeps giving profits.

After the 2001 crash computers were used to create a ‘big brother’ security state, with the excuse of terrorism. History rhymes. The tribes on top change but the ‘engines’ of our technological civilization, greed and violence, fostered by money and weapons, have not changed. It is thus absurd to focus on tribal rivalries, and point out to this or other tribe, but much more intelligent to understand the systemic cycles. Indeed, little difference there is between the British, American and French treatment of Negroes and Indians in the XIX fascist age or the treatment of jewish and slavs in the XX c. fascist age, or the treatment of Palestine in the XXI c. except the fact that we are now in our neo-fascist age, and so the control of information about our neo-fascist age is far deeper than the one we make of past eras, which are ‘history’; and the dates… We are at the beginning of the Jewish-American fascist age, in the earlier 30s, so our neo-Disraelis and neo-Hitlers have not yet exterminated our ‘primitive enemies’… Yet as the trends of history continue, and the new awesome weapons of the singularity age, robots and Cosmic bombs are developed, it is to be expected that in a few years the number of causalities of this fascist age will increase…

 

 

In the graph the Rainbow Planet & its 7 modern cultures derived from historic, memetic beliefs, AS THEY are being carved in the process of globalisation of the FMMI system of corporations.

In the perfect world, one ruled by social scientists not people-castes of power, the first conscious decisions of all global politicians will be National reform: Cultures NOT nations should be the political units of the rainbow planet. So power would be transferred upwards to the heptarchy of 7 cultures and downwards to the regional ‘communities’ the way the new-humanism wishes (new left party and young movement in Europe – Indignados/podemos in Spain being the most clear case and America – Occupy Wall Street and the Ecological/community movement).

In the left graph we see the reality of modern Globalization, as the Financial-Media/Military-Industrial complex born in the Anglo-American culture, with head in the original biblical go(l)d culture invades all others through its media communicator systems. Each colour on the left represents 1/5th of the human population. The blue 1/5th is the Western World made up of the Anglo-American, EU and old british and iberian empires, controlled in their Financial-Media networks by the single World culture of the FMasters and its mass-media and Wall-Street-City-Frankfurt banksters.

As such it is in an splendid permanent robotic war evolving fast the new terminators of the XXI c. with Islam, the original enemy of the conflict between Apartheid Israel and Palestine, now blown up to the rest of the empire, as the rival culture is demonise by islamophobia and hate media. So in the process the European, Humanist culture this blog represents has been erased under the dual boot of an Electronic Big Brother with the excuse of terrorism and the dismantling of the Welfare state, with the excuse of financial Unification through the private ECB which does NOT issue money to states but becomes the armed branch of the FM-empire and the robotised German Military-Industrial complex.

OF course, Russia, which is Europe and should have joined immediately after the end of the communist dictatorship of the red army the European Union, bridging with China to build a social-democratic alternative to the FMMI Anglo-American empire has been denied its position, to counter-balance the German reborn IV reich, and was carved into statelets, denying even the Russian Nature of Kiev Rus, the founding centre of the nation, today called Ukraine (as if London or Paris was carved out of France or UK). The culture of Asia, with its self-evident radiating centre in China, was also carved out already in the XIX c. when Japan moved wholesale into an imitation of UK & Germany, as the leading FMMI system of the East. It did the job so well that ended being a rival to the FMMI anglo-American empire and so W.W.II ensued. But after the war, now as a puppet of US, Asia kept its 2 sides: the original centre, China, demonised by the ‘wo-ku’ nations surrounding it (dwarf pirates, the ancient name given to primitive Korean and Japanese pirate riders of the celestial empire:)

So US tries to exploit this artificial division, always busy in its attempts to create a new III world on the area (division of Korea, of Vietnam, of China, with Taiwan and H.K. puppet Japan played hard against all of them, etc.)

On the other side Mestizo Hispano-America, the courtyard of earlier Anglo-American mass control of 3rd world nations with military caudillos corrupted with ‘papelitos’, (debt-usury Pounds and Dollars issued for free in UK and U$, on exchange for real wealth – lands, mines and tax-farming of poor mestizo Hispano-Americans by the criollo conquistadors) was left a bit out of the hook when the FM-empire refocused its racist, hate media in Islam, obsessed by the other nation of Its Israeli elite. So some mestizo leaders from Chavez (duly murdered with a lethal viral cancer) to Morales, have taken back some rights for the ancient mongoloid social mass of their people. But many ‘bad hombres’ to the service of the US, the drug cartels liberally provided with NRA weapons and the usual elite of corrupted dictatorial politicos and Sephardim banksters, still run the show. Specially in Brazil and Argentina; hence we put still the continent on the blue empire.

As it happens with all the commonwealth nations. But Black Africa is now partially out of the hook divided between the US-UK-French-Israeli corporative exploitative mining companies and the new kid in town, China, with much more positive policies for African nations, which are starting to grow much faster, with loans from Chinese developing banks, with the downside of a massive growth of population, lost of forest land and fast extinction of life-Gaia species. Islam, we know is the land of very-very bad hombres. So no need to comment on that. India, though is a great disappointment for this writer, ever since Lord Mounbatten crafted the raj into artificial statelets on the basis of hate-religion speeches, to make a mess of it, with Hindi vs. Islamic nationalisms.

WHAT we call Indonesia, which also comprises the lost-stolen lands of Australasia, was the original birth of the Homo Sapiens talking man (likely the Homo Floresiensis) and should have been reconquered by a less pacifist/naive Gandhi, going underground during the Salt March and liberating by force the ENTIRE Raj from UK, which was easily doable in the 1920s, then making NOT religion but Bahaist mestizo-like movement of ideas, the counterpart of body-mestizo Hispano-America: a FUSION CULTURE OF ALL THE CULTURES OF THE WORLD NOT ERASED AS IN THE FMMI AMERICAN WOLD, WHERE PEOPLE ARE NOT IN A MELTING POT, BUT ERASED OF ALL ORIGINAL HUMAN MEMES TO CONVERT THEM INTO $LAVES OF CORPORATIONS, WITH THE ONLY ROLES OF REPRODUCING MACHINES AND CONSUMING-VITALIZING THEM. And so the FMMI system, NOT Euroamerica, the humanist culture of laws and bills of rights imagined before the Industrial r=evolution by the highest minds of the Euroamerican culture is now globalising and erasing all the other cultures we shall study in this section of the blog.

The stock-market, the brain of the economy.


“The World stock-market, the reproductive brain of the economy, systematically favors the reproduction of metal-goods over Human Goods, which are scarce, as humans lack direct credit and all the money is created for and by corporations for its small elite of stock-rats which merely enjoy life as the automated systems of reproduction of machines ‘do their bidding’:

best 3 crises overproduction

We live in a World ruled by digital languages, and their species, mechanical herds. That is our present reality. A world ruled by scientific machines, stockratswho worship technology andcompany-mothers that terraform the Earth into a new organic ecosystem, the Metal-earth.

How that construction takes place?

It is directed by an organism of reproduction, the company-mother, which has diversified into multiple species, each one in charge of reproducing an organic machine. To do so, however as any reproductive process, a language of reproduction, ‘a genetic language’ able to give orders to the elements fo the reproductive process is needed.

In the Metal-earth, that language is digital money  , a language of information processed by ‘metal-brains’ [computers] about to give values, and organize with monetary orders the reprodction ofmachines, as your brain organizes your body system with nervous orders, or the DNA organizes the cell with genetic orders..

money gives orders to the ‘enzymen’workers and consumers that catalzie the reproduction of machines.

Where is the brain of that mney? The place where those orders are invented, where money is reproduced, and distributed to the different elements of the Metal-earth? It has as any brain of any organic system a center, and a networks that distributes the information. The center is called the Stokc-market, the networks that disributes the information to the different company-mothers of the emtla-earth, ist eh financial system. The financial system is the equvialent to the nervous system of your body, or the Golgi reticles of the cell throguh which RNA travels and transfers its orders to the enzymes that make the cell.

How it works that reproductive system in the organism of the Metal-earth?

The stock-market is the brain of the eco[nomic]system, which orgnizes all the reproductive organs of the Economy: all its companies. It does so cre[dit]ating monetary orders. To ‘cre[dit]ate’ [credit=create] means that a ‘credit of money creates’ reality, ever since monetary orders substituted verbal orders as the cause of actions among humans.To that aim stock-markets reproducemoney which latter is given to the best reproductive companies, that are able to create the best machines of the metal ecosystem.

With that money, the active organisms of creation, the company-mothers, invent and reproduce the informative and energy machines that shape the Metal-earth.

In this manenr Stock-markets invent the future species of our ecosystem by inventing money for certain companies to the exclusion of others. These companies will create then technological products with that speculative money, and sell them, thus expanding these products in society.

In this manner certain products are created, and certain products are eliminated.

The process is simple. A company wants to reproduce a new machine. It then emits money in the form of null-cost paper, in the stock-market. The financial system distributes that money which becomes a physical money [notes]used by the company to buy humans [workers] and reproduction systems [machines, scientists, factories]. The fompany also buys politicians and laws that will allow the company to become active without any limitations to the destructive power of their products.

Once those products are produced, it will dissuade humans to become animetals and consume=vitalize the existence of those products, and test=choose their quality.

Of course the stock-market means a brutal injustice against mankind who work for money, in favor of company-mothers,, who emit moey for free money in the stoc-market. An example: boy of 24, got 7 billion dollars for a program called netscape, which was just a lot of digital numbers, that however had a great use to expand the ‘network of machine-information’, the computer network. That money given to citizens in a ‘demand economy’, to consume Human Goods such as food and tourism, health-care and ecological entertainment could have boost the ecosystem of nature and history enormously.

We seee now the dobule injustice of stock-amrkets. They monopolize the cration of money, and they do not invet it in things humans want.

So the second question is why the stock-market does not create money for those human companies?

The answer is: because those who own the stock-market, the ‘stocrats’, are animetalsbelong to cultures that believe in sciencemachinesmoney and technology as supreme goods, as thewealth of nations .

It is all that simple. The wr0ong ideas, govern the people who own the language of creditation [credit=creation] of this planet.

So they are inventing a wrong planet, full of uneeded machines. While the ecosystem of nature and history has no resources, no investments, no rights to invent money, and so no capacity to act and defend itself against the growing pressure of company-mothers who seek indirectly our extinction as they expand the ecosystem of machines.

+75% of world-stocks are in the hands of people belonging to the Jewish, British and Germanic cultures, and those who copied their culture in Asia, Japan, Korea, Taiwan. You might argue that because the worship science, money and machines they have created the company-mothers that manufacture machines nd own them. So it is a tautology that being the stock-matket a system used mainly to reproduce mahines, the stroctats have to loe machines.

That might be true. Yet, against that tautology exists the power of elected governments to control the rights of ‘credit’ by law, their power to reform those ‘monetary stock-markets’ and oblige them to creti what society needs.

On the chances that elected governments make that reform hangs the future of mankind, the creation of the Metal-earth, or the Human-Earth, Hell or paradise; a world such as the one of today descrbied in the illustration, in which machines reproduce and Human Goods are scarce, or the reversed world, a Human World in which the goods people need, multiply.

Who survives or who becomes extinct in the economy is determined today by the orders that the stock-market delivers to the bio-economy. The Bio-economy is not chaotic, but a systematic process of reproducion of machines of information/energy. What is the system it follows on that creation? The biological process, by which all human organs are copied in metal-organs, in such a manner, that a new macro-oranism of metal, the Metal-earth, appears.

In that sense the future will create the products and networks that the Metal-earth needs to become a Uniersal organism. This is done in the same manner that a biological species invents an organic body. We can prove it because the history of stocks is known, and it parallels the history of an organic body, constructed by a brain. Since stocks appeared, waves of stock-creditation, monetary orders delivered by stocks, have created the future in three ‘evolutionary horizons’ of bodies of metal, minds of metal, and networks of metal. Exactly in the order biological organisms are reproduced. Stock-markets appeared in Holland to creditate gunboats. In the XVII and XVIII century stocks cre[dit]ated gunboats on a massive scale. Those gunboat companies of Holland and England shaped the future of the Earth. They extinguished entire human cultures, displaced millions of humans from Africa to America, and Europe to America, changed the ‘landscapes’ of tropical nations that worked to feed the ‘bellies’ of gunboats, with tropical crops, etc.

In the XIX century stocks cre[dit]ated railroads on a huge scale, and railroad networks changed the Earth. Then it cre[dit]ated road-networks and cars, which inhabit the planet by the billions, extinguishing forests and carbolife landscapes. In the XX century stock have cre[dit]ated metal-minds and networks of information. Through all those cre[dit]ating acts stock-markets, the ‘reproductive brain’ of companies, has invented a new reality, the Metal-earth. This has been accomplished by reproducing monetary orders that control enzymen, ‘organic species of metal,’ and networks where those organic species now exist. That is indeed how ‘living organisms’ of microcosmic size are created. Brick by brick, network by network, directed by a mother-brain of genetic information. First bodies, then minds, finally neural networks are constructed under the genetic orders of the brain of the creator. In the case of the Metal-earth those networks have been constructed under stock-market orders.

When stocks instead of warriors took over the control of Nations, the metal Earth evolution became a ‘professional’ process. The evolution and reproduction of technology is cre[dit]ated by the invention of stock-money. The symbiosis between stock-money and companies of Top Predator metal-species has cre[dit]ated and developed a new organism, the metal earth, with some basic-organic metal-species. They have free creditation in stocks since the first companies: Informative metal-species, metal-weapons, metal communicators, and financial machines.

In the graph, the cre[dit]ation of machines is caused by creation of money in stocks. It does so according to the natural structure of an organism: Those companies, which reproduce the 2 fundamental Organic cell-machines of the Metal Earth [energy-weapons and information+communication machines] receive the bulk of stock creditation, used to evolve and reproduce its products.

World stock: the mathematical brain of Tp=Mv creditation:

image055

Those products under free stock creditation, have radiated worldwide since clocks [primitive metal-minds], the press [primitive metal-communicator], telescopes [primitive metal eye] and gunboats [sea weapons] were cre[dit]ated by the Amsterdam market. Today stocks creditate networks of computer communication [internet], complex metal-minds, and all sort of species susceptible to becoming weapons [satellites, planes, cars=tanks, etc]. They are created as peace products, which give the illusion of symbiotic power to enzymen. They can be transformed into war machines which erase enzymen in times of war. They are the fundamental organic ‘pieces’ of a complex clonic body – the Metal-earth. The Metal-Earth shows its biological nature, in the organic products its brain, World stock creditates, and in the networks it builds with that creditation: informative and energy networks, like the blood and nervous networks of your body.

The stock-brain.

The organism of the Metal Earth has three symbiotic organic species, Metal minds, Weapons and Networks of monetary information. They are the informative, energetic and reproductive systems of the Bio-economy. Their reproduction and evolution have been guided by stock-markets since the 1st stock-company adopted in Holland the clock [first metal mind], the gunboat [top predator weapon], astronomical instruments [first metal-eyes] and digital information [monetary values, wages, and prices] to reproduce profits and control humanity [colonies, workers, consumers, slaves, politicians and parliaments].

Companies and science were symbiotic as reproducers and creators of machines since the beginning of the technological age. Both give value to reality [the Universe in the case of science, mankind in the case of companies] with metal-minds and clocks. It is the invention of the clock that began the scientific method of ‘study of Universal Time with clocks’ and the scientific method of ‘controlling men’ with clock-wages. Dutch Companies of gunboats needed astronomy to increase the accuracy of their slave-hunting trips. They needed clocks to value workers, and compare them with machines, according to their ‘enzymatic’ productivity. Modern science owes its beginnings to clocks or tempo-meters of Metal, which evolved into computers; to ballistics which evolved into Atomic missiles; and to telescopes=metal eyes, which evolved into digital information and satellites. The use of those instruments by currency and warrior governments of western Europe validated science. Particularly useful was the production of weapons closely related to Physics; and the production of clocks, by companies of pricing. They needed clocks to equalize ‘human products’ with machines products in terms of productivity, of hour-wages.

There is a choice between stock-investment in metal-goods mainly in the three top predator organs of evolution of metal: Weapons; Telecom + computers, and financial companies; and investment or credit for Human Goods. Those three metal-goods form the three-organs of metal form evolution, and have been always at the head of stock-speculation=free money, since the invention of stock by gunboat companies. What proves beyond reasonable doubt that present Stock is truly the future brain of the Metal Earth, in charge of evolving Metal species, towards perceptive form, by fusion of energy and metal mind organs, in companies controlled by financial information. Those stock-species have been methodically cre[dit]ated by stocks since the XVII Century. They are three basic organs of energy, information and reproduction of any species. Hence, the three components of future sentient metal, evolved into the Stock system.

It is a fact that those goods are the goods promoted by classic left-wing parties, which should be given the generic name of ‘Humanist parties’, parties that promote Human Goods.

On the other hand the poverty of nations is their wealth in those goods which destroy mankind, such as weapons, which destroy our bodies, or robots, which destroy jobs, or ‘mental machines’ such as TV-networks that hypnotize humans in front of a false virtual world based on violence and movement [animal eyes, become hypnotized by light and movement even if it harms them, like flies going to the light where predators eat them easily]. Such hypnotism ‘consumes’ between 3 and 6 hours a day of our lives, diminishing our social intercourse, our capacity to learn through readings, and make us violent men, obsessed with consuming and money. Addiction to television could, in such a sense, be compared to addiction to drugs.

We could also include Internet among such negative goods. Around 25% of Internet time is dedicated to pornography. The anonymous system of internet, and the technique of browsing does not allow sound relationships between citizens either, or a serious education, as a library with analytical books provides.

Weapons, robots, and ‘metal-mind networks’ are therefore metallic goods that diminish the health of nations, despite being promoted systematically by right-wing=metal parties. Besides they are goods that require few workers, far less than Human Goods, since machines are best at reproducing metallic machines. Or, as in the case of robotics and internet, they directly attack human jobs. Robots can potentially substitute all industrial workers. While a worldwide system of internet sales will mean the end of at least 100 million workers worldwide in the sales and shopping sector for the benefit of a few multinationals through computerized sales systems.

The Future Invented By Stocks: Biological radiations of machines.

With the arrival of a new species of money in 1973 – computer e-money -, and the imposition of ‘deficit zero laws’ new fundamental changes are occurring in human societies. We only reproduce now what companies want; primarily machines. Governments have become obsolete. So we are encouraged to exist only as human animetals, who perform the two fundamental tasks of reproducing=working and consuming=testing=evolving machines that support the goal of company-mothers. All other values and jobs are ignored and not priced.

Deficit laws in most modern nations forbid governments the creation of money beyond what they extract from citizens through taxes. So minted money is limited. This does not happen with stocks. There are not “deficit” laws against the free creditation of stock-prices. No political lobbyist would accept these laws. Today in stock-markets, speculators have the right to say what is the value of stocks=companies. Such “free money” is very often wasted, as in the case of billions of dollars invented to reproduce Internet companies with no profits, and no value to man. They have begun to destroy the “family shops” of the entire world, with e-sales.

A bio-economy in absence of Stock can be easily compared to the blood of a primitive cellular body: the blood-money distributes energy and information to the whole system of cells. Yet when an informative brain is created, the control of the language of information by the brain distorts the flows of information according to the ‘desires’ of the brain. In an economy the same happened: with the arrival of stocks, money and cre[dit]ation was no longer ‘diffused’ among all human cells, who wanted human goods.

Now it was concentrated in the hands of a few stocrats that loved and reproduce machines.

Before stocks controlled money, money was mainly in the hands of social religions.

What they reproduced? Human goods. Indeed, the Church had by law to give 50% of its monetary information to the poor, and it spent it in human goods, from art to agriculture.

Today companies give 0.0% to the poor, and concentrate in the reproduction of machines.

So the goals of company-mothers have become the cre[dit]ated goals of our societies.

As a result we have moved from a demand economy based in human goods fostered by a physical currency in power of citizens, and organisms of cre[dit]ation of money that followed ethic orders of human verbal nature [churches, welfare governments] into an offer economy based in technological goods and the wishes of company-mothers.

Only a demand economy, cre[dit]ated by the wishes of citizens with direct access to credit in human goods, could become a human economy that will cater to human desires, and rights of reproduction and evolution.

Nations should ‘give for free’ a minimal quantity of money to each citizen, specially to the poor, that will spend that money in basic human goods, fostering their demand.

As easy as that: free money, to spend in human goods. Then the reproductive system of companies will have to switch into reproducing those goods.

An economy that favors humanity instead of machines is a demand economy where credit would be born in the bottom of the bio-economy [consumers], in the human side, not in the metal-side of company-mothers and stocks. Such economy could maximize the distribution of energy-human goods, to all cells of human societies.

This was only attempted briefly in a small Catholic=social state of America, called Maryland, and actually it worked. People ate very well there. It was also the method of old Neolithic cultures where money was wheat [Sumer, the land of the first writers]. So Sumerians had the highest levels of life and human goods of the old World… till bronze animetals destroyed Ur. Yet Sumerians knew what was the real human paradise: a Sumerian wrote the Genesis, perfect parable of the tragedy of our historic ecosystem, preyed by economic warriors.

A Stock-driven economy, on the other hand suffers chronic scarcity of human goods, and the real ‘level of life’ of its citizens is very low; even if ‘statistics’ show a great National Rent, by adding up to such rent the prices of technological goods such as weapons and digital Communications, which do not increase but lower the ‘level of life’ and intelligence of mankind.

We do not eat weapons. Those add ons to our rent are absurd, ideological ways of measuring wealth to promote machines, as an economical goal.

Real human wealth is often the opposite to such GNP statistics, biased to boast machine-value.

For example we can compare the level of life of Italian People [a country which hold the top predator culture prior to stock-markets, and so it still has a lesser ‘capitalization’ of its economy, and a likeness for human goods], with that of the English [top predator European World-stock].

Since Italians have not such a powerful stock system of redistribution of money in favor of company-mothers and metal machines, they have much more credit for human goods. So Italy is full of art, good food, and human goods, textiles, housing, holiday resorts, etc. Italians have more free time and live much better than Americans, full of telecommunication machines and weapons – despite having far less theoretical GNP rent-wealth.

Stocks and economic statistics deform the nature of goods produced in favor of machines and against human goods [whose companies have minimal credit in stocks].

They also deform the productive process against small companies with a much more human approach to workers [family companies that treat workers as human beings]. Instead stocks favor the ‘growth’ of mammoth companies, that treat means numbers, and can reproduce huge metal-machines, specially weapons and informative networks.

The small size of Italian companies and the small fortunes of their elites, and the lack of bombers they have is the key to the happiness of Italian life. What it matters to Italians is a good life, with minimal metal, and that, the Italians have it in greater measure than the Americans. We conclude that a Human goods economy without stocks is a better choice for mankind.

The statistics are fundamental in this matter: the 20% of poorest Italians and Spaniards [top predator pre-stock cultures], have a rent superior to that of the poor Americans, or English [top predator stock culture]. Italian poor people have almost double rent than the English poor. They have far more human goods.

In Britain the City [stock-system] produced in 1992 17% of English GNP, and that number is rising. That wealth goes to companies and a few stocrats: The British poor people had in 1994, 3958 $ Vs the 6276 $ rent of the Italian poor – for 5814 $ of the Americans.

This is a prove of the inefficiency for humans, of the American and English systems, which have been inventing money for 400 years, and yet can’t give their lower population the rent of the Italians which lost the privilege of free money creditation, in… 1440.

If Americans could not invent for free money as a top predator currency the poverty of their lower classes would be so alarming, that they would enter, and might enter in the future, into a revolutionary war for survival…

Italians have had two world wars this century; and have not rights to invent free money since the renascence. Despite that unjust position, they are richer than the Anglo-Saxon people.

In fact Americans have plummeted their standards of life since electronic money in 1973 appeared, substituting the physical dollar [Nixon end of convertibility, introduction of Pcs in Wall Street].

On the other hand the 2% of stockrats who own 90% of America, have become amazingly wealthy. While the middle American has suffered increasingly scarcity of human goods, diminishing quality of housing and food, education, artistic and environmental protection… Of course, its weapons, violent films and digital machines have multiplied.

It is again the cycle of symbiotism between war and money we have described in the previous book. The unhealthy wealth of Adam Smith at work, to destroy yet another once happy nation, who loved life and human goods… If people could govern, if nations had a demand economy, if paper money were invented and distributed by governments to their people, the world would be a paradise. It is not, because our governments neither obey the orders of their citizens, nor they cater the needs of the human species. Stockrats govern us. We do not live in democracies, but in ‘stocracies’. Yet stocrats are animetals who believe in money as the intelligence of God, and in science ands mathematics as absolute truths.

So they hardly understand rationally where they lead mankind. They actually merely follow the mathematical, evolutionary nature of money. So do our governments which are stocratic systems of monetary power. Let us consider such scandalous proposition, that uncovers the biggest of all modern myths: the idea that human citizens govern nations. I assure you that citizens would not commit mass suicide if they control our governments. The common people has common sense and wants to survive. Only the fantasies of power of animetals drive us to extinction, through their control of governments for the benefit of company-mothers.

The last radiations of Stock cre[dit]ation

We can forecast the future “radiations” of stock money, and forecast what they will creditate, by looking at the body-graph of the Metal earth, and thinking what is still left to translate from man to machine to make the metal-Earth an organism.

What is left to creditate?

The final neural networks of the Metal earth, and its sentient, metal-species.

So the stock-market first will creditate neural networks: internets.

This is the present stock-craze. Today we observe a new radiation of machines that extinct labor: internet companies sell directly to consumers and. They will eliminate in the next decade 50 million human from the productive system of the Earth.

Stocks “finance” those companies. Last year the two companies that obtained more credit in stock markets [over 1000%] were two internet sellers, Amazon. Com, and “E-bay”… E-bay has 35 employees. Yet the market has given to it over 3 billion $ of free creditation, so it can throw out millions of shop workers.

The biggest chain of book-stores of California has already closed down.

Amazon. Com with a few hundred employees have eliminated the entire sector.

Money is taken from the sector of human goods to speculative stocks.

When the internet is built, there will be only a final “cre[dit]ation to make.

The creditation of robots.

Stocks will creditate robot companies.

Money will flock to the likes of Honda, and Mercedes, and Siemens.

They will build up all kind of chipped machines, till all men have dozens of chipped machines, ready to awake, from cleaners to cars, ready to substitute mankind, ready to obey informative networks.

Meanwhile, without credit, human goods will become more expensive to replicate than metal goods, till a point in which replication will end.

The brain of the metal-earth, World stock, and the monetary language it speaks, creates organisms of metal. Among those organs it creates top predator species, weapon species, and informative minds. Those species will not distinguish among men. They will become top predators of all of us.

The next Stock-market radiations: Networks And Robots

Stock speculation creates the different “radiations of metal-species,” by giving a priori a “credit” that company-mothers use to give monetary orders to workers and consumers.

In this manner the great radiations of products have been cre[dit]ated since the gunboat craze in Amsterdam and London stocks.

Today the craze is for internet companies. You just need to have any idea about internet, and put up a company, and the market will give you total credit.

The process is very old. Last century was the railroad craze. As one commentator of the economical scene put it then: 4/5 of the corporations today are raised with a single goal: to obtain credit [“Free Money”] from the market. Such is also the nature of the speculative wave of tech-software that we suffer today.

The consequence of last century railroad speculation was a worldwide scarcity of credit for human goods, and the hyper-abundance of railroad lines, many of them without use, except for the massive quantity of money their stock holders could get.

People are not aware of the enormous waste of money stock-credit implies.

At 7000 $ per kilometer, the cabling of America was enormously expensive.

With that money the entire American population could have got health-care.

Instead they got 150 channels of digital images to program them into violence.

We won’t insist in the economical aspects of stock cre[dit]ation already explained along the pages of this book. We rather focus in the “vital consequences” of the internet networks that will be worldwide built in a few years.

How it will affect humanity?

The pattern of previous cre[dit]ations of Metal-species will be repeated. Internet will increase the communicative power of future war machines, and it will eliminate masses of labor.

In fact internet was born in the Pentagon, to unify the control of all its weapon systems. Internet-intranet and defcom, the networks that stock cre[dit]ation is inventing, are communicated through the head brain of the Metal-Earth: the Pentagon.

The end of History is iconic, prophetic. The bitten Apple of the tree of science is written in the first PC computer. The brain of the Metal-Earth is a pentagon, symbol of the devil. The last year of the human millennium, 1999, looked into a mirror reads 6661, 666=I=eye; the number and the eye of the Beast.

The function of the net is the same as the nervous system of a body: to control and manipulate all the ‘cellular homes’ of the body, by means of informative orders.

What this means is that the internet will substitute previous informative networks of mankind, becoming the basic neural network for the two fundamental types of information men receive:

Monetary information, and visual-verbal information.

The other informative metal networks [press, radio, TVs] will become fused within the net. People will spend more time in the internet that in those networks.

Besides, the internet will also control the second language of human information: money. Indeed, the internet will become the shopping mall of mankind.

As a result millions of jobs of the sector of sales and shopping will disappear.

As all other previous products, the internet will reduce even more the number of human jobs available to mankind, throwing millions of people out of job.

What will be its usefulness for machines?

First it will integrate the entire Stock-Company system into a body-system of reproduction of machines, as the neural network of the body regulates the reproduction of the different organs of the bio-logical body. Imagine each economical sector as an organ of the body: the multinationals of cars, and road arteries, are energy organs, the multinationals of information and the info-way arteries are informative organs. Each man is a cell. When man becomes extinct, each machine will be a cell that will receive information and energy from the networks. All of them will become integrated by internet, till finally only a ‘few reproductive organs’ for each metal-species will remain. The aim of companies is to create a few great world=Multi-national reproducers, as a body has only a few organs to reproduce each basic product of the body. Red globes are reproduced in certain bones. Cars for transport arteries will be reproduced by a few worldwide companies. This will be possible because neural networks will integrate all company information. Then after nations disappear in the final “Armageddon” [men Vs sentient machines], the internet will unify all world factories by species, through satellite communication.

There will be a worldwide producer of “red globes”=cars for the arteries of the Metal-earth. A single worldwide producer of planes. So on.

The internet networks will be used by other networks of information we are building today for the machines of the future: the network of mobile, wireless telephones, will be the ears of future robots…

Their function is to allow free movements to all individual cellular species of the Metal-earth. Mobile phones=ears will communicate platoons of tanks, and top predator weapons that will roam the metal-earth.

Today men have basically a use for machines: men consume=test them, and improve their quality.

When men are gone, the selection process of machines, will be performed by Matrix, by net computers. Or maybe Machines will fight for survival in a metal-jungle till they learn again the laws of social evolution, we have forgotten. In that case, the Metal-Earth companies will reproduce them. Their offspring of machines will defend the factories. Such is the Nature of war: a glimpse to the future ecosystem of Top Predator metalife…

Unless we reform stocracies, we cannot change the extinction of history

Stockracies, should be the true name for democratic governments, since stock-market companies, not politicians control democracies.

Yet then the myth – the government of the people – would fall; then democratic governments might find a very aggressive population asking for responsibilities to the real government of nations – their companies. This is not something stockrats want.

The essence of a dictatorship is to govern without responsibility.

Stockracies are dictatorships of companies. Companies and those who own them, stockrats, want to govern without responsibility. To that aim they hold politicians responsible, and stockrats free of guilt.

Stockrats govern without any responsibility. After many bribing, and fighting they passed in the XIX C. the Law of Anonymous societies that, redeemed them of any guiltiness by their acts, as the Special courts for aristocrats did in the past.

The trick is simple. Companies control politicians. Companies act under orders of Stockrats. Yet stockrats have no civil responsibility.

So stockrats govern us without responsibility.

Those who hold power consider their highest privilege, not to account for his acts of power.

Yet to hold power a caste needs control on the tools of power.

In human societies there are 3 such tools: weapons, money and words [laws, religions].

Aristocrats in the past based his power in weapons. They controlled production of weapons, and with weapons they controlled the churches of words, the law, and money [the king minted money, backed by military power].

That was the essence of the dictatorship of the ancient world.

Today the very same tools of power and control are in the hands of stockrats. Stockrats in the present base his power in money.

They control the production of money through banks, shares and bonds, in stock-markets. With that money they buy politicians and control the law. They also produce the weapons, that allow them to control the military and the people. They, as aristocrats did, do not account for his actions.

Instead, citizens and politicians merely obey stockrats as they obeyed aristocrats in the past.

All has changed but all has remained the same.

We moved from aristocracies of weapons to stockracies of money.

The people are still in the blues, regarding to real power.

Company-nations are owned by stockrats, cultural dynasties of Biblical origin.

The world is ruled by corporations of stock markets with their legios of workers and consumers masterminded as costs and source fo financiation by company-m,ohters of machines, for whom humans slave as labor and now now longer have even that role. Those stockrats are ths the other side of the world-stock which we shall deal with now.

We define our social organisms not as democracies, as human free social organisms ruled by the human verbal language [ethics, laws], which pursuits the common welfare of society, but as ‘economical ecosystems’, or company-nations based in the power of money and weapons, in which men are controlled by herds of companies, and their monetary orders, whose summit of organization is the stock-market, owned by stocrats. The World stock-market is the brain of our nations. It invents money and delivers monetary orders to those companies it selects by its capacity to radiate faster new machines, to evolve them faster, to transform faster the ecosystem of history, or to indoctrinate faster mankind.

The extinction of ecological cultures and nature become just a secondary consequence of that process, under the bio-logical laws of creation and extinction of ecosystems.

All in all this means that the real power to create the future of our societies is the power of stock markets, and the stocrats who own stock-companies, associated in lobbies, who have free money invented by stock-markets to buy out human actions and laws. The result is that the power of the world alternates between companies, depending on the individual resources of those companies.

So as machines evolve, the companies that have the top predator machines of each age govern nations, since they have more money to bribe better the politicians, get their favorable laws and expand their machines.

So for example America was first governed by gunboat companies from England. When North-American gunboat companies became more efficient that the British ones they decided to become top predators of power. Their stocratic owners the defied the British gunboaters [Boston Tea party], and displaced them, in the American independence war. They hold power in America for almost a century, till a new top predator animetal species, the land-animetal, the railroad reached a higher power. It was more perfect machine able to displace inland, and so it was reproduced to conquer the continent. It paid his best animetal lawyer, a lobbyist of the Illinois Railroad company, called Mr. Lincoln to provoke war and pass laws that made the railroad barons of the age the owners of America [railroad act]. When Lincoln became more human, the stocrats paid Staunton, his defense secretary to create the complot that killed him [historic proves are overwhelming, though obviously in the present world in which real history is deformed by Animetal ideologies, difficult to know].

It is the age of robber barons. The owners of railroads were the owners of America. Then in the XX century the more evolved land animetal, the car became the top predator machine and its companies controlled the law. In Europe they put Hitler on place, who made the top predator car [the tank] the backbone of German industry, and cause of II World war. In America, ‘what it was good for general motors was good for America’. So happens with Ford: Mr. Ford, famed animetal stocrat owned the laws of America. One example: he disliked alcohol and paid first in Illinois and then in Washington, politicians to forbid alcohol. It was the dry law.

Then after the war, the evolution of mental machines [radio, TVs, computers] took over, and those who owned those networks became the top predator stocrats of America. It is the age of Jewish-American power, that substitutes on top of the stocratic pyramid the Calvinist-Anglican age of robber barons.

Finally today, those who own networks of computers, invent the laws of America.

Soon there will be those who own robot companies. Yet those will be the last animetals with power, because robots will take over as ‘complete species’ that no longer need symbiotic help fromhuman beings. That is why history is so close to extinction, and humanity so close to become obsolete. Again, this book is not about morality. I will not argue here the power of stocrats, which seems unavoidable. I will only try to explain reality and explain why stocrats should preserve their power, even if they keep exploiting the Earth, by limiting the evolution of the last species of machines – the robots, that will eliminate them from the economic ecosystem as they eliminated the Indian of the prairie.

To do so they have to acknowledge the laws of the Universe, the law of social evolution that make humans the same species, and metal a rival species. So they have to control and harness the power of metal, and company-mothers to the benefit of mankind, not of the machine.

We should therefore talk of right-wing parties, as ‘machine-parties’ or ‘metallic-parties’ that promote metal-goods and the companies that reproduce them, over human goods, and the human labor that reproduces them.

We should oppose the goods and futures that such parties promote, from the point of view of which goods are good to man and truly mean the wealth of nations.

Right-wing=metal parties promote a world where machines, and metal goods, and the companies that reproduce them have more rights than human beings.

Left-wing=Human parties promote a world where humans and human goods, and the citizens that reproduce them, have more rights than machines.

 THE DIGITAL MIND

So we would have to conclude the article with an study of the digital mind and its Boolean algebra, but as AI will kill us all – sorry no happy truths here – unless we abort it with a social r=evolution nowhere in sight, I won’t evolve it further with any insights.  So here we end our review of the monads of the Universe in all its scales.

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: