Home » “ωorldcyclesºf

“ωorldcyclesºf

±∞∆•ST

Foreword.  

In this first (and second) lines, we shall as we study in depth the structure of fractal §pace and cyclical ðime beings, from an external point of view , in a general, non detailed, non-formal manner (as we will do in 3rd and 4th lines) by using the 3 epistemological pillars of GST: The experimental, scientific method, the correspondence principle and the GST-proper, isomorphic method, meaning any law of the Universe must be in correspondence with classic theories and it must be applied to physical, biological an social systems equally.

So we structure many posts with a simple scheme:

1) Epistemological Proofs, which resume in the Correspondence Principle with classic theories, experimental proofs and description of its:

  • its ‘mathematical≈ physical’ properties of the Universe derived of its topological=spatial symmetry.
  • its biological properties, derived of the 5D coexisting ∆±1 scalar social structure of all its systems and its time-symmetries≈worldcycles
  • its ‘perceptive properties’ derived of the existence of Tiƒ singularities, Monad-mind-mirrors which either mechanically, vegetatively or consciously DO enact the program of ex i=st¡ences, that is the actions, max. ∑exi which ensure the survival of the being, and we are called by biologists the ‘drives of life: ∆ï:perception & communication> ∆a:accelerated motion towards fields of >∆e:feeding energy> ∆œ: reproducing>∆û:evolving socially into ∆+1 Universals. 

Which then leads to a general analysis under the non-reductionist set of spatial≈PHYSICAL, biological≈temporal and perceptive≈human survival properties of All beings, to be studied in the second line on general terms, the third line for the three type of properties and sciences, an in the fourth line, for all an every species and isomorphism of Nature, in what should be time permitted under other researchers during this century the final non-Æ enclycopedia of GST systems:

2) Physical systems, those belonging to the ∆±i≥1 scales, far removed from anthropocentric man that denies to them the properties of:

3) Biological systems, those belonging to non-anthropomoprhic ∆±i≤1 and…

4) Historic, Humans systems those which are anthropomorphic, at individual ∆º or social ∆+1 system, either human or mechanical, made by imitating our organs and functions in metalife (organic machines, entropic weapons and informative money).

So for each of the key ‘elements’ of the program of informative creation (Tiƒ), energetic reproduction (ST) and entropic extinction (Spe) we shall describe in this first line, its more abstract, logic and mathematical properties, with minimal experimental details, while the second line will be all about experimental details of those properties; and then again with far more detail and depth, the their line will explore those logic≈temporal an mathematical≈spatial properties of GST and the fourth line elaborate the blue print of a fire encyclopedia.

As usual my apologies for the slow disorder form of construction of this web: translation from Spanish, digital copying of handwritten texts and pouring blocks to final polish – more like a diamond mining, cleaning, polishing process to finally get the shining of the organic, fractal mind of the Universe, whose brightness should enlighten future generations of huminds of Airobots, to feel the unity of all what exists

ls.

Energy ωorldcycles

Abstract: We have come to the final element of reality that encompasses them all, the energy world cycle.

Symbols. As a world cycle represents the whole in its time, full realisation from birth to extinction, we shall use the same symbol than for all the ages of the being, Ω, but in minimalist form, ω, the last letter of the greek alphabet. A world cycle indeed is both the alpha and omega, yet the alpha is omega, because time is cyclical. It is indeed the sum of all the cycles of the being, between birth and extinction. As it is measured in each instant of existence by the volume of energy of the being, such as if we know the function of existence, to know at a certain time its energy will give us the point of the world cycle in which the being exists, we shall change the symbol for energy, to ∃, the symbol for present existence in logic thought. So e will be the symbol of entropy:  e x i = st, ∫e x i = ∃ω

As energy is precisely the integral of momenta and actions of entropy and information of any system of reality. So the sum of those actions finally web not a worldline but a world cycle, which overwhelmingly tends to be conservative, in as much as an other reproduced world cycle takes place, but in extreme detail unless a reproductive cycle has happened derived of the maximal point of the curve, during the mature age of the cycle, ω: e xi , the cycle can be not-conservative.

This must be considered we see cycles as closed cycles when they are more like waves, with a distribution which in its peak reproduces a new wave, but in any case world cycles are best measured by energy in the simplest physical systems and when we consider more complex world cycles, energy still stands in its ‘derivative’, momentum, as the best parameter to indicate the phase of the world cycle in which the being exists, such as Max. Energy will be the point of maturity, as a simple mathematical rule shows:  Max. e x i (e=i).

That is a product is maximal when both numbers which ad a value, are equal to each other: 5 x 5 > 6 x 4…

So the maximal ‘instantaneous momentum’ of a being happens in its classic age of the world cycle, while its total integral will give us a zero value, origin of all the fundamental equations of energy in physics (Hamiltonians, least time principle and lagrangians).

Yet we are expanding those concepts, from present mathematical momentum, to existential momentum and top predator force, reached in the classic age of the world cycle, and from an energetic ‘measurable quantitatively’ worldcycle of physics to the life and death world cycle of any super organism. So we are not going to be pretentious and ‘reduce’ a human word cycle to a hamiltonian. We are NOT gurus and dogmatic religious physicists, but philosophers of sciences, and once the concepts are clarified, it turns out quite obviously that in social sciences, art will represent better the worldcycle of a civilisation, literature the worldcycle of a human being, and obviously genetics that of a cell, evolution that of a species and so on – languages which are not specifically mathematical but code the 3±∆º elements of the being with different jargons.

And so ∃ω, will be our preferred symbol, for the world cycle of energy, within the routine of GST, which uses similar but not exactly equal to the common symbols of ‘science’: stience, ωorldcycle, supœrganism, ∏ime, §pace, ∃nergy, etc.

13 3 AGES

In the graph all physical and biological systems, ‘live and die’ as super organisms made of ∑atoms/cells that evolve through networks that transform Entropy into information (Life arrow) and then explode those information networks back into disconnected Entropy when they have exhausted it (death arrow) determines a sequential, existential life-death cycle invariant in all beings:

– ∆-1: Birth as a seed of information.

-Max.Entropy x Min.Information: Energetic youth of external motions. Sp-Limbs and sensory membrane rule.

-Sp=Tƒ: Balanced, ‘classic’ age dominated by reproductive/communicative systems:

The present, or steady state is the longest, more efficient state and can be defined mathematically simply as Max. Spx Tƒ -> S=T, since both equations are related, as 4×4>5×2>6×1, the point of balance between Entropy and information is thus the maximal point of the equation of existence, the mature, re=productive age when the species reproduces its Entropy and information fully in other zone of space and time.

It is the desirable age to ‘stay for ever’ the immortal top predator point of the wave of existence of any species or individual or universal, Consider the classic definition of beauty in art, as a balance of forms, and indeed, we see the harmony and proportionality between form and size, space, as the definition of classic beauty. And we will return to that, when observing that all forms of art can be reduced to 3, lineal, epic, energetic art, classic art, and baroque, informative, with an excess of form.

On the other hand, the Spe, big-bang arrow of entropy is one of death and dissolution of information in any scale:

image021In the graph we can see how the Universe creates ‘waves’ of super-organisms that travel worldcycles, mostly life and death cycles across the ∆ST Dimensions of ‘existence’. Seen in this manner from the perspective of the ‘dimensions’ of form, of information, what we see are just ‘manifestations’ of a deeper program, the ∆ST worldcycles of creation and extinction of ‘existential curves’… in ∆ST Dimensions.

It can bee then anything, any species of the Universe, from an atom to a human, from a galaxy to an ant.

Any of those ∆ will however co-exist and evolve in time, through 3 scales of social complexity:

∆-1: Its cellular scale where it will be ‘born’, and then evolve with a reproduced ‘herd’ of similar species, till emerging into its individual state. Then as an individual it will participate into:

∆+1: a society, or ecological network where it will obtain its Entropy and information, till…

∆-1: the moment of death in which it will dissolve back into its cellular scale. In the graph in physical scales the process is understood as a big bang.

Finally the arrow of evolution of information is a vortex of creation of a singularity mind that co-exists across several scales of the 5th dimension

Thus systems undergo during its ‘time evolution’ from past to future, between birth and extinction, not only the ‘worldline’ trajectory that physicists describe, that is a series of spatial motions, but a worldcycle, through the added new dimensions of informative complexity that makes the system, grow in social size, emerge into ‘higher planes of existence’ and regress to its cellular state.

In this sense science describes those cycles with different parameters of Entropy and information, as it does in the case of the life of stars and galaxies:

image067

In the graph, we can see the point that maximizes the function of existence, e xi of any species.

Mathematical physics.

 

If past-entropy and future information converge in present momentum: m x v and the integral of momentum is the conserved energy cycle we can easily translate for the simplest space-time world cycles – those of motion of physical systems, the laws of the larger system of motions of ‘information=time’ of the Universe.

In a more mathematical form, a world cycle is the sum of all the actions a system realise during its cycles of existence.

And so it is closely related to the Hamiltonians and Lagrangians of Mathematical Physics:

 ∫ ∑ (e x i) ds dt

A motion of time when integrated into a zero sum, closed in space-time by a return to the initial state of the particle-beings, which moves, becomes a world cycle. And the infinite sumes of zero sums, the infinite never-ending world cycle of the whole time Universe.

We can consider that the motions of time cancel each other, creating natural tendencies towards a world cycle.

As a generation of information is inverse to an extinction by dissolution of information.

A locomotion that spends energy is inverse to a a feeding action that absorbs it.

A perceptive moment in silence, mapping the Universe is inverse to a communicative actions that tries to modify that Universe.

And a reproduction of the present state is a reflexive action equal to itself.

So the total sum of actions and growths and diminutions of the parameters of the being tend to a final zero-sum or world cycle.

In the graph all sum of actions in time bring a world cycle, in which finally the arrow of generation of information inverts into an explosive big bang of entropy called death in which information expands as a field of pure entropy.

 The sum of cyclical space-time actions of any super organism trying to absorb energy for its body, information for its mind, reproduce that information to exist beyond death, and evolve socially with similar forms into larger wholes, creates an imbalance, due to the excess of ‘informative actions’ over energetic actions, which brings a constant growth of information, that warps the being and finally kills it, when all information is exhausted, in the explosion of death.

It is the world cycle of existence which all beings follow, except in the few cases in which a more complex strategy ensured the privileged species its immortality…

How can we represent formally a world cycle? Simple as a sum of energy and time actions, which a being performs trying to maintain a balance between its E and I quanta of spatial and tempera existence.

So as the being, absorbs and emits energy and information, ±∆e,i and reproduces both, exi, in balanced states (S=t) with its larger and smaller ∆±1 worlds in which it will seed and feed, we can develop a series of actions in space and time, whose sum along a path of time or duration and a path of space or motion and feeding territory, will bring about a quantitative description of the world cycle of the being, basis of a qualitative description of all its events as a ‘narrative’ of the 7 motions of time:

∫∑ e x i ds dt=0

In the equation of the world cycle we resume all events, ±∆e, i, exi, ∑, of emission and absorption of energy and information, its reproduction, and social evolution with similar quanta,  ∑, across the 3 ∆ scales of co-existence.

We will first study those time cycles of existence and its equation of 3 ages, and then consider the causality that creates those world cycles as a sum of the 5 different type of actions of the Universe:

Å=∫å=∑,æ,e,Ï,Œ û

I. 3 TIME AGES:

PAST≈ENTROPY, PRESENT≈ITERATION, FUTURE≈INFORMATION

The 3 motions of time.

In this post we shall study the 3 motions-ages-dimensions of time, Past, entropy; present, repetition and future, information, the sequential life-death cycles they cause, and its symmetry with the 3 parallel forms of space that synchronically create all the systems of the Universe:

In the graph, above, the 3 time motions of the Universe, ‘explosive, big-bang, decelerating expansive motions’  with maximal energy, repetitive, wave-like motions and implosive, vortex-like accelerated inward motions, with maximal information.

The space-time ternary isomorphism deals with the 3 ages of Time and its symmetry with the 3 organs of space, as those 3 parts of space (Sp-Limbs/fields<ST-wavebodies>Tƒ(heads-particles) dominate each sequential age of Time, the spatial past (Sp), the Present (ST) and the Temporal, cyclic, informative future, Tƒ.

We can in that regard consider 2 generator equations for the synchronic and diachronic views:

Time view: Ps>ST>Ft.
Space-view: Sp>TS<Tƒ
The reader will observe which is the fundamental difference between a temporal and spatial view of reality.

In time, systems constantly convert Motions of space into ‘forms’, indicated by the > symbol, through 3 ages, past-youth, preSenT repetition and future information.

While the spatial synchronic view is not ‘lineal’ in their constant use of motion converted into form but focuses on maintaining and reproducing the relative present as the limbs move the body and the brain informs it, coming both together into that present form.

So we write the Sp><Tƒ confluence as Sp x Tƒ = Sp-Present, whereas > and < come together into a product.

This is the essential duality of the Universe, its 2 relative organisations. One the synchronic view conserves the present by focusing into the body-wave element, which iterates and reproduces with the help of the entropic motions and informative order of limbs/fields and heads/particles, the system making it a relative discontinuous immortal system (generation after generation). On the other hand the arrow of time-life increases information till collapsing all the information of the system. So how the system balances itself?

2 answers derive from those facts:

On one side, because when we add both views there are more (3) > arrows than < arrows, the overall motion of systems is towards >> excess of information and ageing.
On the other hand to restore the process this >> excess of informative arrows is compensated at the end of the informative 3rd age by an explosion, << of entropy and death that erases all the information, Ft<< Ps. And this happens to all systems, so the total is a zero sum of formal motions.
It is all that simple, that harmonic, that just, that immortal and that horrifying for anyone who is closed into its ego-point of view and cannot accept the zero-sum balance of the sum of both cycles.

Below, 2 representations of the sequential order of those motions in most life-death cycles, in scientific and philosophical terms.

 

The Universe is a game of 3 finite time motions, which inter-act with its ‘intelligent spatial ∂till forms’, to create the patterns of life-death cycles, and simultaneous organisms that structure reality.

This truth has been known to Eastern philosophers for millennia. But in the west only the dialectic eastern european schools started by Leibniz (who translated the I ching, introduced binary numbers, and defined fractal points and zero-points – monads), had a worldview of this more complex reality.

Unfortunately absolute space-time carried the day and has obscured the fundamental dialectic, paradoxical, ‘taoist’, principles of time that structure all systems. In the graph, the eastern most clear symbolic formulation of those ultimate principles in the Korean yin-yang, ternary groups, and its equivalent modern formulation as a life-death cycle that goes through 3 ‘fixed points’ of maximal energy (youth-past-entropic motions), balanced, steady states, Sp=Tƒ (adult, reproductive age) and informative 3rd ages (reflected in the broken 3-yin triad of the flag) that precede the explosion of death.

Those 3 key points define the 3 intervals of most ‘existential functions’,  from the world cycles of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time, to the Hamiltonians of Energy (a similar concept to that of the motions of time) of quantum physics and classic mechanics. Those 3 time arrows put together in sequential cycles completes a total zero sum, which conserves the eternal formal motions of the Universe, establishing a basic sequential life-death order:

Past-entropy (youth)> Present-repetition (adult age)>Future information (3rd age) << Past-death-entropy.

BIOLOGICAL TIME. THE 3 AGES AND HORIZONS OF SPACE TIME BEINGS.

The 3 ages of existence.
The fundamental consequence of the dual, quantic arrows of the Universe is the dual process of life and death that affects all space-time beings.
After conception as an informative seed, (+1) all beings go from an age of maximum energy (youth) into an age of increased information (old age). Yet, when all the energy is trans-formed into information, the species collapses and information dies (-1), exploding back into cellular energy.

So we talk of an existential cycle between conception (+1) and death (-1) with 3 ages.
The cycle of existence from youth-energy into a 3rd age of information, and back again dissolving yourself into the Universe, is natural to all beings made of spatial energy and time since energy always trans-forms itself into information back and forth. Look at humans. Young people have a lot of energy but little information.

Mature people have both energy and information. While old people have a lot of information drawn into their wrinkles and minds, but little energy. So as time goes by, human beings go through 3 ages, called youth, the age of energy; maturity, the age of reproduction; and old age, the age of form and wrinkles, of information and memories.
The 2 arrows of space-time existence are in Philosophy the arrows of life and death; evolution and devolution; creation of form, of in-form-ation and extinction, release of form into energy.
Taoist philosophers represented the “life and death cycle” with the yin-yang cycle that moves forwards, turns around and then returns backwards till closing the cycle. Buddhists represented it with Mandalas that they erased periodically to express the metaphor of life and death.
The cyclical, quantic nature of space-time implies a reality with 2 opposed temporal directions.
A bidimensional cycle is a representation of those 2 space-time arrows that move back and forth.
Yet the 4 dimensional geometry of the Universe is also cyclical, as it seems to fluctuate between the “explosive big-bang” and the “implosive big-crunch”. Since all is quantic, all has a limit in space-time, including the Universe. So when the space-time of the Universe comes to an end it will fall back into the big crunch. So in the field equations of Einstein time curves and gives information to space, creating masses but then the information of those masses explodes into spatial energy according to Einstein’s second fundamental equation, E=Mc2, and then the mass dies. Einstein studied that dual process for the entire Universe, which is a flat surface of vacuum energy that masses and black holes curve in the dimension of height.

While Theory of Evolution studies the process in life, which also started as a ‘flat’ surface of cellular energy without form, that evolutionary information warped, raising it to the height of man. Then, when the quantic space-time cycle of a human being comes to an end, we become warped and wrinkle and die, exploding back into cellular energy much faster than the Universe, since we have far less ‘content of time’.

Since those are similar processes in all quantic space-time species we talk of 3 ‘ages’ in any space-time field between conception and death, a first age of pure energy, the big-bang youth of growth and expansion; a second age of balance that happens between the spatial energy and temporal information of the being or ‘steady state’, and a third age of warping and collapse that ends in death, when all forms dissolve back into the energy that informative time had evolved.

More over, those 3 age are mathematically equivalent to the 3 solutions of Einstein’s general equations of space-time, which have been wrongly taken as 3 different Universes, when merely represent the same Universe through its 3 ages . After all Einstein also talks on how ‘time curves space’. Yet Einstein only applied those solutions to the entire Universal space-time while quantic space-time widens its application, accepting that each quantic piece of reality obeys those 3 solutions, passing through the 3 ages of space-time. Quantic space-time means that we can study those 2 arrows through its E, ExT, T, ternary ages, not only for the absolute Universe as Einstein did, but also for each of its pieces and species, which have shorter lives: All of them show in their existence both arrows, as they expand in their youth, their energy age; combine energy and information in its mature, classic age, often reproducing its quantic nature in other zone of reality to achieve a certain degree of immortality; and finally they warp in their old, informative ages.

For example, I am a quantic space-time field called Luis Sancho, warping, passed my youth, into my old age of growing information…
We are all limited pieces of space that live a quantic time and then disappear back into the dust of space-time that made us. On the other hand, cyclical space-time implies that while all forms of reality disappear, the logic game of space/time is eternal, because while some beings evolve others devolve, while some live others die and therefore both directions of time balance into an eternity of quantic cycles. So Lao-Tse said: ‘The game of yin-yang is eternal, its forms are not’.

The space-time field quantic equation.
Tƒ represent those 2 arrows of space-time fields we formalize space-time fields through the Equation of Fractal Space/Time  that defines any space-time field as a series of quantic, cyclical structures that transform constantly energy into information and vice versa through a series of basic phases or ages that conform the life and death of the field:

Se=>Ti (arrow of informative Life)+ T<S, (arrow of energetic death):   ∑S<=>πTƒ

The 1st arrow of ‘informative life’ is in fact the sum of 3 partial phases of a space-time cycle:
– Spe; or energetic youth, when the being has more energy than information.
– Se=Tƒ; or state of dynamic balance reached as energy becomes transformed into information.
– >Tƒ; or informative, old age, when most energy has become wrinkled into information.
– Followed by the inverse arrow of death, Tƒ<Sp, or explosion of information into energy, when the 2 elements of the organism, its energetic and temporal field, split, breaking its organic balance:

– The Lorenz transformations show how that S=T balance break in physical particles.
– While in life the mind of an old man becomes childish and the body keeps wrinkling till it completes his cycle. So the disconnection between body and brain provokes his death.
Both arrows together create an action-re action event, a life-death, a space-time cycle: Spe<=>Tƒ.
Physics reduces the 3 phases of that ternary equation to one, Ti<Spe, the arrow of disorder, lineal energy, entropy and death, which now we widen to include the 2nd arrow of reality, the arrow of order, information and temporal evolution, relating both arrows into a single, unified space-time field. And we affirm that:

‘All what exists is a system that transforms back and forth, quantic pieces of spatial energy into temporal information, shaping space-time cycles’.

So the Quantic Spaces-Times equation defines in mathematical terms any event and form of quantic space-times, and widens the arrow and law of Energy Conservation, the main Law of Science, to include the arrow and principle of Conservation of Temporal Information. The Quantic Spaces-Times equation is to quantic space/time what Einstein’s field equation is to continuous, space-time.

The 3 ages of existence of human beings, matter, stars and Universes.

With those formal equations we can describe the existence of a space-time organism, as a development of the Quantic Spaces-Times equation, S<=>T, in 3 sequential phases/ages /horizons, S, <=> and T:
+1: The cycle or organism starts its existence when its space-time field is created.
Sp: It is the first horizon or ‘energy, youth age’ of the cycle, in which energy dominates the system and so we write this phase as, max. Sp x min. T.
<=>: S=T. It is the balanced age of the cycle or classic age of ‘life’, when energy and information are in a constant proportion. It is the most efficient age, when the cycle reproduces.

ST: Max. T x min. S: it is the 3rd age of the cycle when information has combed and exhausted the space-time field that warps into itself.
– 1: It is the end or death of the cycle that reverses its form and becomes energy again.

Those phases of a space-time cycle are the engines of ‘existence’, which is an infinite sum of space/time fields, fluctuating between birth and extinction through those 3 phases or ages.

Yet its applications are far wider, as the horizons, ages or phases of a space-time field go beyond the realm of quantic physics into State Physics, where gas is the energy state, liquid the balanced state and solid the informative state; into Cosmology, where it describes the Universe as a space-time system that fluctuates between both limits, a form of pure time, the singularity (min.Sp x max.Tƒ) and a form of pure space, the big- bang (max.Sp x min. Tƒ); into Biology, where it describes the 3 ages of living beings or the 3 horizons of evolution of species and into Social Sciences,  where it applies to the organic description of the life and death of civilizations and its artistic forms: 

3 ages best corrected

Age of Entropic, kinetic energy (Se),     Classic age of Harmony,  Old Age of information (Ti),   Explosion and Death:

Human: Youth (0-20a.)    Maturity (20-40).       3rd age     and   death (60-80).

Culture: Epic, Lineal Art. Realist, Classic Art.  Baroque Art.  War.

Matter: t<tS: Plasma  Max. S: Gas     S=T:Liquid   Max. T:Solid     T(Mc²)<<S

Star: t<tE:Nebula. Max. E: Gigant star. S=T: Sun. Max. T: White Dwarf. T<<SpNova

Galaxy:t<tS: Jet  Max.E: Irregular.  E=T Spiral<=>Elliptic.  Max.T:Globular   T<<S:Quasar

Universe: t<tS: Big-banging; S=T:Stationary; Max.T:Vortex (Big-crunch); T<<S:Big-bang

In the graph, the singularity that existed prior to the big bang was an ‘old form’, Max.T=Min.S, of max. temporal information, defined by its minimal spatial size, which exploded into pure space, the bidimensional sheet of energy of the ‘young’ Universe, Max.S=Min.T, a form with minimal time and maximum space that now starts to curve again with time, creating the eternal cycle of the Universe, described by General Relativity in terms of its total space-time.

The parameters of ST fields: Speed, density and force of existence.
The previous simple definition of the Universal big-bang cycle shows how revealing can be the Quantic Spaces-Times formalism. In that sense Quantic space-time is more interested in ‘morphological changes’ than in ‘translation changes’ studied by classic Physics. Yet both disciplines use some basic mathematical concepts to formalize those processes of change. The 3 fundamental ones are:
– ‘Speed’, which measures the ratio of change between space and time parameters.
Galileo formalized translation change with the equation of translation speed, V=S/T. In Quantic Spaces-Times fields we use the same formula, V=S/T, to measure ‘existential speed’, the morphological change between the inner proportions of spatial energy and temporal information accumulated by any being, that change with the 3 ages of any space-time field:

Thus the speed of existence is maximum at the beginning of the cycle, in the age of energy or youth, when S>T, and hence V=S/T>1.

In its mature age, the speed of existence hardly changes as the energy and information of the being are in balance: S=T, V=S/T=1.

Next, in the third, old age of the being when information dominates, the speed of existence is minimal, as T>S, and so s/T<1.
Then, when the being goes out of balance, as most energy becomes transformed into information and its speed of existence, Min.S/Max.T, tends to zero, death happens.

So the energy and information of the space-time field break apart and information explodes back into energy. Now the speed of existence cannot longer be measured, becomes a mathematical uncertainty.
Graph 1.7 shows how energy and time change through those 3 ages, giving way to different e/t ratios for each being and each age.

Those proportions are, in fact, the ‘scientific constants of existence’ of each species, that show the ratios of energy and information of any being, which remain stable during each age, suffering with the transition between ages and specially at birth and extinction an accelerated ‘peak’ of change. Those constants do exist for the physical systems of the Universe and its forces and particles, (G, c, l.). Yet since the Universe is enormous and lasts billions of years, as their fundamental particles do, Universal constants seem to us ‘absolutely constant’.

However in a smaller system such as a chemical re action, they change very fast.
– The density of information, D=T/E, is the inverse function of speed, which shows the informative density and complexity of an space-time field.
-And space-time force’, TxE, which measures the quantity of spatial energy and temporal information of the field caused by the combined ‘quantic action’ of its energy delivered in a period of time, during which the space-time field  ‘inter-acts’ or ‘reacts’ to the quantic action of other space-time field. In Biology it defines a ‘top predator’ as a species with maximum energetic and informative force; that is, with the stronger body and fastest mind.

Most constants and laws of science describe specific space-time fields through its speed (S/T), density (T/S) or space-time Force (ExT). For example, the Planck’s constant is a product between Time and Energy. While a molecular temperature is defined as the ratio between pressure, a temporal parameter and speed, a spatial parameter: P(t) V (e)=nRT. And so it measures the minimal quantic action of the world of atomic particles.

On the other hand, the space-time force of a being is equivalent to the Physical momentum of a particle, M(T) x V(E), or product of its temporal mass and spatial speed. And indeed, the particle with bigger momentum is also the top predator physical particle that survives in any collision.

The classic age of a being and the limits of existence.
We know by experience that the space-time force of a being is maximal in its mature, classic age. Now we can easily prove it in mathematical terms. Since a product maximizes when T=E, which defines precisely the age of maturity.  For example, if E+T=10, then 5×5=25 > 4×6=24 > 3×7=21.
Thus t=e maximizes the TE-force of any organism, because when Spis proportional to T, the being maximizes the coordination and communication between the cellular elements of the body and the informative neurons of its brain and so it works smoothly, efficiently: ExTi(t=e) ≈ max. ET.

Thus, the dominant age of any species is the ‘classic age’ of ST-balance and reproduction or ‘steady state’ that elongates the life span of all beings, as their systems maintain their symbiosis.

Those constant proportions make any ST system efficient. So most ‘survival species’ keep harmonic ratios of energy and information, which produce the most ‘beautiful forms’. Since beauty is precisely the perception of an efficient, top predator form with balanced energy and form.
Yet when the E/T proportions are out of balance in the youth and third age of a being, the excess of energy or information often ‘kills’ the species.
Science expresses those balances through all kind of Physical, Mathematical and Biological constants that range from the golden ratios of architecture and natural organisms, to the organic constants of biological species. So we define another essential law of quantic space-time, the law of harmony between energy and information, body and brain, mass and speed (momentum), which in biological, human or physical systems creates the most efficient systems of the Universe.

All organisms are defined by an ‘equation of organic balance’ between its |-Body and O-Brain or energy and information systems. When the body and brain go out of balance, beyond their limits of energy and information, the species dies. So a human being dies when it goes beyond its limits of energetic temperature. While in the Universe, where the limit of energy-speed is C and the limit of  informative order is 0 K., no particle can cross those limits.

Yet, in a quantic Universe of multiple space-times, those are not the absolute limits of speed and temperature of Reality, as Einstein said, but only the limits of our quantic light-based Universe. It seems that beyond our light Universe, it extends a ‘Gravitational Universe’ of ‘dark energy’ and ‘dark matter’, in which there are faster than light speeds and colder than 0 K temperatures. And we hint at its existence in cosmology through the study of black holes that seem to be the doors between both Universes.

THE 3 ±1 AGES OF SPECIES

image010

The 1st species packs a lot of information in minimal space: in the graph the big bang black hole, the chip, the 1st bilateral animal and mammal, the horse and the 1st technological, small human. All of them followed the basic S-T beat of evolutionary rhythms, as they are born in small ‘forms’, which have ‘faster time cycles’, hence evolve faster, and then they grow in size in its first age, slow down, reproduce massively in space and finally diversify according to the ternary and dual rhythms into new species.

However the species does NOT control its external absolute space-time ‘world’, and this is what the next graph shows. As it is the absolute space-time in which the species exist, and specifically ITS commands of the LANGUAGES OF INFORMATION of the world, which defines its survival chances. As informative perception starts all the chains of actions (∆o-bserver->∆a-ccelerated-motion->∆e-nergy feeding->∆iteration->∆universals eusocial evolution).

So the species which better speaks the language of the ecosystem survives better. Hence the first eyes (cephalopods) extinguished most cambric species and started the radiations of species; the first speakers, homo sapiens extinguished all others; and today the chip radiation of mathematical species is simply speaking extinguishing life and making humanity obsolescent, even if we are not conscious of it. 

The Evolutionary Plan of organisms and species. The Ternary Symmetry between time and organic space

149

This old graph, is one of my favs, as it shows as few other ‘realities’ the intimate connection between still space states and time motions, since it is both the trajectory of existence in time of a micro part of a galaxy, a star falling into the informative mind-hole of the galaxy, and the image in space in the larger scale of wholes of the whole ‘galaxy’. This duality between a temporal motion in the faster i-1 scale of the being and its spatial perception as a point of a larger whole, in the slower perception of ∆+1 is one of those beautiful symmetric paradoxes the Universe constantly displays.

In Biology the 3±1 ages of a Quantic Spaces-Times field apply both to organisms and to species that go through 3±1 horizons, parallel to those 3±1 ages. Thus there is an informative, ‘intelligent’, organic order in evolution. Though it is not a plan designed by a ‘personal God’ who cares for mankind, but by the limits that the morphology of lineal space and cyclical time and its combinations impose to the evolution of species.

Thus the so-called ‘intelligent design’ is the ternary, existential cycle that applies to every form of the Universe as it evolves in 3 possible species: an energetic, lineal species, an informative, cyclical one or a combination of both forms that shapes a balanced ExT, spiralled form. Those 3 forms become the 3 horizons between birth and extinction of any species.

Though the arrogance of mankind conditions us to believe either in ‘total chaos’, to make man the only intelligent species (the scientific, Darwinian approach to evolution) or in ‘personal, planning Gods’ (the religious one) that care for us in order to maximize our ‘existential will’, unfortunately empirical facts, of which this book offers many cases, prove that the ‘Game of Existence’ is as intelligent as we are and it has an order indifferent to man, resumed in those 3 ‘differentiations of forms’ repeated ad infinitum in all structures, species, events, cycles and ages shaped by: A form of max. energy; a balanced form, s=t, that reproduces faster and a form of max. information: e, ei, i.

The 3 evolutionary horizons of species.
The creation of a new species takes place according to the same 3 ages of any space-time field that become the 3 horizons of any species: after conception that creates ‘a seed’ of pure information and minimal spatial energy, species go through a young age of energy growth that creates ‘big species’; a mature, reproductive age of forms in balance between its energy and information when the species maximizes its reproduction, radiating in huge numbers; and a third horizon of informative evolution when it diversifies into multiple sub-species, becoming finally extinguished, (the equivalent to the death of any organism), or creating a new top predator form, a ‘son species’ that will restart a new cycle of life.

+1:  Birth: max. T. The black hole paradox (conception).

The ‘black hole’ age of any species is parallel to the informative, genetic conception of any organism born out of a ‘seed’ that packs the maximum genetic information in the minimal space. It is caused by the slight dominance of temporal information (quantic time) over spatial energy (quantic space). So a new top predator species is born with a lot of new, genetic information packed in a reduced size (Max. T=Min. E). This happens because information is processed faster in smaller spaces.

For example, a ‘logic instruction’ is resolved faster in smaller chips. It follows that tiny species with huge numbers of ‘neurons’ create quantic actions faster than slow, bigger species. And since they are highly informative, they can coordinate those quantic actions in herds that act simultaneously as a single organism. So their S-T force that defines a top predator is higher in each quantic action of space-time that the ‘slow actions’ of a big body. Thus small English boats shooting faster against big galleons defeated the Spanish Armada; a pack of wolfs kill slow reins and herds of orcas kill bigger whales. Small, intelligent top predator brains rule bigger, less informative bodies, because time dominates space, information dominates and shapes energy.
Thus men, the most informative animals, are the Earth’s top predators; black holes, which have maximum gravitational information, are the top predators of the Universe and chips rule machines.

I Horizon: Energy Age: max. E: Top Predators and Extinctions 

In their youth, carbohydrates (fats), worms (planarians), echinoderms, cephalopods, fishes, amphibians, mammals and chipped machines grew into energetic, lineal or planar, big top predators

A newborn, small foetus grows very fast in size as it multiplies its cells. By homology a new species is born as a small, informative, complex being that latter grows in spatial size during its energetic youth becoming a, lineal, energetic, big top predator species, that feeds on less evolved forms.

Thus after conception, young fishes grew into big sharks of linear forms; after the polemic Homo Floresiensis invented technology the next Homo Sapiens with an extensive fossil record were big, energetic Neanderthals;the 1st big molecules of life were fat carbohydrate chains of linear form; the 1st insects acquired soon gigantic bodies in the Carboniferous; after chips were born as small machines placed in PCs and toys, the first robots they control are big tool-machines and huge weapons of mass destruction, lineal missiles and planes, that kill human beings.

 II Horizon: Evolution or Age of balance and reproduction: max. Sp x Tƒ. Radiations of species.
Then, the species finds a balance between form and energy and it reproduces in massive radiations: carbohydrates gave birth to amino acids with a nitrogen, informative atom on its ‘relative Head’; sharks gave way to balanced tubular fishes; brachycephalic Neanderthals gave way to dolichocephalic Cro-Magnons that multiplied and colonized all continents; while young giant stars acquire the balanced size of yellow suns, the commonest of all stars.

III Horizon: Evolution or Age of information: Max. Tƒ: max. Evolutionary differentiation.

Species grow in height or acquire cyclical forms, as they evolve through their 2nd and 3rd horizons, improving their sensorial, informative skills: Nucleotides become the top predator life molecules, echinoderms change to cyclical forms, fishes organize their networks in the dimension of height, amphibians become round, improving its smell, saurian and mammals become biped.

The main difference between organisms and species happens in their 3rd age, due to the discontinuous nature of the individual ‘cells’ of species, which do not become extinguished unlike the tightly controlled cells of organic systems, dominated by nervous, informative systems that exhaust and warp totally their energy, till the organism collapses.

Instead species continue evolving, creating new, complex species with more information, growing in the dimension of height. So the Homo Sapiens evolves ever more complex technological tools; the nucleotide appears when it adds informative depth to the amino acid (with an informative, nitrogen ring and an energetic sugar ring); the yellow sun becomes a neutron star of higher gravitational, informative density; while insects develop a growing brain capacity and bees and ants appear.

(±∆): Extinction Vs Evolution into super-organisms. The scales of the Universe.

Thus, organisms dominated by their informative networks, which consumes the energy of the system very fast, die sooner than species, according to a clock set by the rate at which energy is metabolised, ‘in-formed’, by their nervous system. While species, which are dominated by the individuals and the herds survive for eons with 3 basic strategies according to the ‘ternary plan’:
– Max. Sp: Creating balanced, trophic pyramids that maintain always a supply of new victims.

– S=T: Dversifying their individual forms into new species, instead of ‘degenerating’ into a warped space-time field. It is a parallel strategy to the reproduction of an organism, which in this manner survives his own death. Thus we talk of ‘son species’ that create evolutionary, genealogical trees similar to those of any organism.

However son species tend to kill-extinct the mother species, feeding on their energy. We call that fact, the Oedipus paradox. So mammals killed reptiles, men killed mammals and robots might kill human beings. While the different generations of an organism work together, creating informative networks between them that shape herds and families.

– Max. Tƒ: Species also evolve socially their individual forms into super-organisms, thanks to the creation of informative networks and languages that integrate them into a whole, bigger form, which is more powerful than the individuals of a herd.

Organisms are dominated by informative, nervous or hormonal networks that pack closely individual cells of max. information in min. space; while species extend over wider space ecosystems in which they share a min. quantity of information, as individuals of species hardly relate to each other beyond the reproductive couple or the hunting herd. And yet, both go through the same 3 ages of space-time defined by the inverse properties of the energetic youth  (max.S=min.T) that defines the herd and the informative old age (Max. T=Min. Sp) which defines the organism.

Hence we consider that the creation of super-organisms is the final evolutionary stage of a herd of individuals from the same species: each individual of the herd becomes then a ‘relative cell of the body’ of the macro-organism. While the specific language of communication and information of the species becomes the relative nervous/informative network of the super-organism, as pheromones do in anthills or nervous impulses did with cells in the Pre-Cambrian ageor financial and verbal languages are doing among humans in History.

The process of creation of super-organisms, departing from individuals is the key to understand the social, hierarchical structure of the Universe. Once and again, even outside the realm of biological life, quantic species of unconnected individuals have evolved socially, first in herds that share a common energy and then in super-organisms joined by energetic and informative networks that pack together and coordinate into a ‘single present’ the quantic actions of the individual forms, shaping a new top predator being with a space-time force, sum of the force of the individual, smaller cells, with less ‘i’-nformation. In formal terms we say that organic quanta gather around energy and information networks creating a bigger individual, whose actions are the sum of the actions of all its cells: ST=∑st-1.

Thus photonic h-quanta evolved into particles; particles evolved into atoms, which evolved into molecules thanks to electromagnetic networks. Molecules evolved into cells thanks to genetic networks of information.

Cells evolved into organisms thanks to nervous and hormonal networks of information. And human organisms have evolved into civilizations thanks to verbal, informative networks. While the Universe has grown in scale thanks to gravitational information from atoms, to molecules, to planets and stars, to galaxies, to the very same Universe.

In the next line we study the inner structure of all those Quantic Spaces-Times fields organized around 3 types of ‘cellular species’ that evolution has differentiated in time, according to the previous 3±1 horizons; and then symbiosis structures in space in 3 specialized ‘organic classes and networks’ as energetic bodies, informative Heads and reproductive organs.

While in Books 2-4 we study the specific Quantic Spaces-Times fields of biological, physical and sociological sciences as all of them follow the ternary plan of creation. Since those 3±1 horizons of existence happen between the birth and death of any species, mapping out both for physical species, born out of the big-bang explosion of a black hole; and for biological species, since the first carbohydrate, the evolution of life from the atom to the human being.

Extinction: Yet if species fail to achieve informative, social evolution, growing into macro-organisms, they become victims of other species that have continued their evolution. So today 90% of insects are social insects; Neanderthals became extinguished by verbal Homos and protista with limited genetic content (mitochondria) became organelles of social, eucaryotic super-cells.

 

THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY IN WORLDCYCLES

Tƒ<|s: cyclic and lineal time/forms. 

Since all beings occupy a certain organic space and last a certain time in its motions, we define all beings as space-time beings, which switch and beat between both states.In the graph, Saturn’s rings are not a mathematical plane made of abstract points, despite their continuous appearance. When we look at them in detail they become in fact quantic planetoids in movement, tracing orbital cycles around the planet. They illustrate the fundamental paradox of perception: Any piece of time/space seems continuous, but when we analyze it in detail, it becomes discontinuous, made of space quanta and time clocks (charges and masses in physical space, circadian cycles in biological systems) moving in cyclical paths.

image037

The key to the understanding of space or lineal speed, one of the two primary substances of the Universe, and its counterpart, time clocks of cyclical form, is the solution of one of the longest disputes of Physics and Philosophy of Science regarding the nature of space and time: are they continuous as Einstein said or discontinuous as quantic Physics and Biology pretend?

Of course physicists  measure those different time cycles with the concept of frequency of a wave or a turning wheel, the inverse of time duration:

ƒ=1/T

Often associated to a wave length, or wheel perimeter: ƒ x λ= S, which measured the distance of a wave or wheel translation, uncoiled ƒ times. But the details of those cycles got lost in the process of simplifying them.

The mind perceives with little detail, most motions of large or tiny objects, and so instead of distinguishing its quanta in motion, it distinguishes just the trace of the motions as distances. So we say that space is enlarging its distance between galaxies or that galaxies move at great speeds. We thus establish a dual concept:

  • Lineal fixed form, that we write with a single symbol, S: |- Space.
  • And Lineal motion, Lineal Time, T. And so the study of both together, is what we call mechanics, in which time is indeed a parameter of space, but only Lineal time, V=S/t, used to measure distances in motion.

On the other hand, cyclical form, in-form-ation, curved in different dimensions, is the other ‘fundamental shape of space’, which seen in motion gives birth to the other parameter of reality, cyclical clocks of Time: Tƒ=O-Times ≈ Form; Information.

We shall reserve the names Times, to such cyclical clock motions and Information to its fixed spatial forms. While ‘Time’, T will be the lineal variety and ‘Space’, its lineal dimension. So departing from those elements, the Universe starts its game which is made of ‘beats’ that transform form into motion, lines into cycles. And since lines are the shortest distance, fastest motion, it becomes the most evident motion; while cycles have the minimal perimeter and stay turning around a point, so they become the most evident forms. Hence there is a relationship between: Line ≈ motion and Cycle ≈ form, which shows in the incapacity of most beings to define cyclical motions, often seeing instead particles or points, when observing rotary systems (such is the case of the Earth).

In the same manner we perceive Time Clocks with fast motions (I.e. a turning wheel) as cyclical form and large rotary systems with slow motions as solid spherical or disk-like forms. So Galileo said e pur si muove, e pur no muove, since he knew the Earth moved rotating around itself and the sun but we saw it fixed. And so we call this paradox, the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science, though never was properly explained and equal, time clocks with cyclical motions, T  and ‘cyclical Forms’: O.

And we use the symbol Tƒ, to express the similarity of both concepts: Form ≈ Clock of Time ≈ Tƒ, which we measure with the inverse function of Lineal Time Duration, that is, with the frequency or speed of those cycles which carries in its form and speed the information of the Universe. This allow us to define quantitatively one of the basic transformations of our O-|, T-S dual parameters:

Tƒ=1/T=Cyclical motion is the inverse of lineal motion.

And so we deduce also that the parameters of spatial distances and circular distances are also inverse.

Yet Form and in-form-ation – a form carried through the displacement of a wave are also related. Information is a cyclical form with a bit of ‘lineal motion’ added’.

On the other hand, Lineal SpaceTime and energy, which is a form moving in lineal fashion are  also related. So we write: Space=Lineal Time Speed≈ Kinetic Energy.

Time and Space are not a continuum as Einstein thought. But they can be treated as such in a general vision, which however is adequate only to study systems, larger than those of human beings, such as cosmic space, but fail to give us the necessary details to analyze smaller world us those of quantum physics.  Thus both concepts have a quantity of truth, but the higher truth=information is in the detailed analysis which makes:

Absolute space-distances= quanta of lineal energy motion.

Absolute Time= Sum of infinite cyclical clocks of time which carry the information of the Universe in the form and frequency of its cycles.

Once this is understood, we will have given an enormous stride in the correct direction to understand ‘fractal, scalar space-times’, the formalism that better explains the fact we are all organic systems made of ‘vital space=energies and cycles of time=life-death world cycles. 

There are in the Universe infinite clocks, forms of reality that trace discontinuous, temporal cycles; and infinite pieces of spatial energy, quantic spaces, divided by membranes, borders and discontinuities, both in organic and physical entities.

The quantic nature of space and time today accumulates enough proves, despite the respect that Einstein’s work still causes, as to be the cover of prestigious scientific magazines. And it will revolution all disciplines of science, since all of them use those 2 parameters to explain their species and laws. It also implies the equality between energy and space on one hand, and between time cycles and bits of information on the other. The only real difference between those concepts was the pretended continuity of time and space Vs. the proved discontinuity of information and energy. Thus now we talk of 2 concepts that suffice to explain reality:

– The space and energy of any quantic being, homologous concepts, both in Biology (where we talk of organic space) and in Physics (where the vacuum is considered a form of ‘dark energy’).

– And the bits of information or temporal, genetic memories and cycles of any being. Since information is stored in memorial patterns that accumulate over time and it is processed in a cyclical manner, as time is. For example, we measure a computer’s informative capacity in MHz, or quantity of temporal cycles of information the computer processes each second.

The 2 fundamental substances or states of reality are thus spatial energy and temporal information that we will call, when properly combined, temporal energy.

We are made of energy and time, which our mind often perceives as fixed space and fixed information, but are truly organic, moving forms.

THIS IS THE ESSENCE OF ALL PHYSICAL SCIENCES: ‘GALILEAN AND EINSTEINIAN RELATIVITY’, which now becomes fully expressed.

Accordingly I called this expansion of modern physics, Absolute Relativity. Since the ultimate teaching of Einstein’s discoveries was to validate Leibniz: we exist in a Universe of infinite, relative clocks of time, each of them breaking space into an inner and outer region of space (first law of topology, knot theory) and relative scales of reality, none of which is when we normalize their frequency of time cycles and size of its steps, more important than other…

Absolute Relativity essentially completes the insights of Leibniz and Einstein on the multiple nature of time clocks that run to different speeds. And its consequences and discoveries are bond to r=evolve the way we perceive the meaning of time itself.

And so the analysis of the relationship between fixed space and ‘moving energy’ and between cycles of time and ‘information’ is essential to understand what we are made of, and how we perceive those 2 elements in ourselves:

All this said another approach to the dualities of the universe is to consider that Time=change=motion is all, while space is a ‘still’ present picture of time:

4920050_orig

In the graph, physicists and humans in general ‘Spe’ space, but have a surprising difficulty to understand ‘the causal flow of time’, by the very nature of its senses, dominated by the I=eye mind, and those of instrumental science, (which starts its experimental method by taking ‘stills’ of time, that portray space with telescopes, accelerators and microscopes). So they consider that time is the 4th dimension of space, as earlier scientists thought that the Sun was the satellite of the Earth, despite the obvious supremacy of the sun… of time over space, which MUST BE defined as a still ‘cut’ or ‘instant of present’, ∂t, in the total flow of times.

So we write the fundamental equation of the Universe in a new derivative form:

S = ∂ t  -> ∫s = t

… from where we shall derive through logic, mathematical reasoning all other equations.

While relativity tell us that we can make sense of both models as both the space and time, earth and sun’s relative different points of view make sense from the subjective point of view of the observer (so from the Earth’s point of view, the sun do seem to move around us, and from an spatial point of view, we can make time, taking only an instant, a parameter of space, ∂t=∂s/v, the higher truth is according to Ockam’s principle

For a deep analysis at mathematical level of time and space, with the quantitative laws of physics, Space must be considered a slice of present Time in each infinitesimal quanta of ‘perception’ of it, dt. Hence we perceive space as ‘still’ and time as ‘motion’. This stop-space and go-time duality is at the core of the Universe. It is also the mechanism by which the mind can reduce the ‘total information of the Universe’ to fit it in its relative infinitesimal ‘0-point:

O-Mind x ∞ Universe = Constant mapping of reality.

It is thus necessary to go beyond the naive realism of physicists to grasp an objective reality beyond the ‘still mappings’ of the mind and its ‘stop-go’, perception of information, similar in an inverse fashion to the stop-go way we perceive film in continuous motion. In this inverse relationship a Universe made of different type of ‘time-motions’ become stopped in mind stills, which then change slowly as those film photograms from ‘infinitesimal to infinitesimal of time’.

Tim is then motion, as opposed to space, which is a fixed form, a moment of the time flow seen in stillness, often just in the mind of the perceiver.

The universe conserves ‘time’, motion, not ‘space’, the stopping maya of the mind –  ‘space’ stops the flows of time, and so the mind means nothing, to the Universe.

Human brains cannot fit all the information of the Universe.

So infinitesimal brains-monads, reduce dimensions, eliminate motion and ‘depth’ so they can fit 5D into the infinitesimal brain’s still spatial mapping, aka O-mind x ∞ universe, in only 2 D….

Our mind thus has lost 3 direct experienced dimensions of reality, depth (we put together 2D from 2 eyes to create the illusion of depth), motion, 4D in that present slice of reality we see, and then the long time dimensions of past to future and future to past we call 5D.

It simple eliminates all that to create a spatial, still mapping of reality, and for that purpose it considers a certain point, normally that of the ego, in the past the earth, the sun, now the galaxy space-time or ‘light space-time’, since Einstein.

But this process of stopping reality, measuring it with a mind and establishing an scaffolding of distorted knowledge is not ALL and by denying some basic dimensions (5D past to future future to past flows) it reduces the human mind to a short of pictorial, spatial still planiland without the dimension of long time.

The result is a simplified, still, dead reality with no flow. Minds=scholars ‘kill’ reality into abstract thoughts and then do kill reality with their actions to ‘project’ what they have in their imagination.
But Time motion never ceases. This was perhaps the biggest discovery of a fractal theorist, Mehaute, which realised that when energy ends, and a system freezes it starts to create information, the inverse arrow – crystallises, keeps ultimately moving time in the inverse dimension of form, spatial, static formal creation.

The beat of time thus might change its direction, its harmonic tones but will never stop

Scientists do NOT understand the concept of the eternity of time, and hence of the Universe and all its systems.

Since if time is motion and motion never stops but transforms back and forth between lineal motions and cyclical motions, then it never dies. But unfortunately after Galileo made time lineal and ‘cyclical time’ became something else, the engine of reality, the beat between the two poles of all systems, disappeared as the engine of change and all what speculative physics and numbers…

Thus today Physicists don’t have knowledge of the first principles:

  1. An immortal Universe (if it had finite duration, T, probability that we exist in that finite time, since non-existence would be infinite (T-existence/∞ non-existence) = 0, ergo as we do exist existence of time motions is infinite.
  2. So what happens is that |-time, lineal momentum and O-time angular momentum constantly transform into each other, and the variations are enormous. As we move into more complex combinations, then is easier to see that conversation in the ‘time’ element of any 4 vector (which is the best part of Einstein, or rather minkoski as you can use it for any ‘time parameters’). So kinetic energy-mass (lineal cyclical time in the cosmic scale also conserves, energy charge, is conserved, and so on…

in the Universe there are many different motions, all local and so we cannot hold truth the concept of a single time-clock as Newton did. Einstein discovered this fact in relativity, when he said (at the time): i am the only physicists that seem to think clocks tic at different speeds in different parts of the Universe. And yet scientists still use the concept of an absolute total space-time for the entire Universe. The number of errors derived of this conception are many.

For example, physicists ‘expand local measures’ to infinity, and bring from local proofs global theories of the Universe, which are by no means certain.

The graphs shows the case of the Cosmic big-bang, which expands the local measure of expanding space between galaxy to the whole Universe, as absolute space-time means a continuous global expansion. Yet in relational, fractal space-time, where space continuity is a mirage of the mind, this perpendicular expansion on the y-axis of the black hole, which expands space-time (distance-motion) by shooting through its polar Kerr axis, dark energy, radiation and matter, is balanced by the CONTRACTION of space in the vortex-plane of the galaxy, where stars contract space-time into mass and curved gravitation.

Another key related case of global expansion is the concept of a single ‘long-term’ time arrow called entropy that expands a phenomena found only in molecular, thermodynamic reactions (molecular entropy) to the whole Universe WITHOUT realising that the expansive entropy of lineal electromagnetic forces is balanced by the implosive, in-formative arrow of gravitational forces. Those 2 simple examples on 2 ‘sacred dogmas’ of physics show how important is the concepts of space and time to fully grasp the foundations of the Universe and as we shall see of all sciences.

Further on, the idea that the Universe will come to a halt comes from another mind paradox: we see all in still, so we think of masses as substance, but they are pure accelerated motion, according to Einstein’s principle of equivalence between gravitational forces and acceleration.

And when we observe the quantum world we do see masses as vortices of accelerated motion. So again, if time=motion is the ultimate substance of the Universe and stillness is a mirage of our perception of reality in small ‘derivatives’ of time (which is how physicists measure space-time: ∂v=∂s/∂t), the concept of a dying Universe would be another mirage of the mind’s ‘spaces’. As motion never ends, merely changes from its rotary, angular momentums or time clocks to its lineal momentums or lineal motion. And indeed, both angular momentum and lineal momentum are conserved quantities of an immortal universe where the fundamental equation is that duality of time motions (and its duality of still, perceived forms in space):

                   O-cyclical clocks of time (angular momentum) <=> |-Lineal time durations (lineal inertia)

Which in the case of physical systems explains, for example, the meaning of E=Mc2, where a cyclical vortex of time, a mass becomes a lineal motion in space, an energy, and vice versa.

And this duality of time motions, lineal inertia and cyclical inertia, which combine into all the possible relative curves of reality is the next fact we must correct since it is the next big error brought about by our founding fathers, in this case Galileo.

We thus define a dual flow of time, and space as a still picture of time. And since time is not commutative, that is the future and the past are different flows, we do have now a way to define them: an inward, accelerated vortex of time which increases the frequency and hence the form, the information of its motion, is an arrow of future; and it is inverse to a decelerating, expanding uncoiling time clock, which is an arrow of entropic past. And in the middle, a steady state, indistinguishable inertial lineal distance-motion is space.

What is then more important, time or space? Obviously Time, even if in our civilisation, based in ‘images’, still images of spatial ‘states’ are more important, as ‘time cannot be seen’ in its inverse flows of past entropy and future information.

Hence the growing indifference in our visual world towards the meaning of time, its long arrow of informative evolution, the meaning of death and its inverse arrow of devolution, the purpose of casual logic, and all related themes, of which we cannot get shallow pictures or use differential, still, present instant equations.

We humans used to understand the world logically with temporal verbs and words and then only made pictures of its secondary details.

So classic definitions of Time started as logic and causal propositions. But now this depth of knowledge is increasingly gone.

Time in that sense was defined always as ‘change’, or rather the ‘perception of change’. So when some place to which we return, hasn’t changed we say it ‘seems as if time has not passed’. Change then according to Aristotle is internal change studied by biology either in evolution or in the life-death cycle or external change, called translation in space, motion. There is also social change and then there is the mental perception of change. So we talk of 4 temporal ‘changes-motions’, which define the 4 fundamental disciplines of science.

On the other hand space was perceived as stillness, the opposite of temporal motion. And the science of Space geometry was the study of still,  geometrical forms.

Then the equations used to describe space become also still moments. And as such space can be considered an instant, a slice of the flow of time, like a still photography of the Universe around us. And indeed, physicists still define space with derivatives, which are instants in time, pictures of the ‘speeds and time motions’ of the Universe: ∂s=∂v∂t, or the equivalent instantaneous measures of light-space or curved gravitation, in Einstein’s metrics.

Those are thus the initial definitions, corroborated by the equations of physics (latter we shall see that relativity merely elaborated on the earlier Galilean equations).

But the problem today is that those simple, all-revealing concepts (time as motion, of which there are at least 2 types, informative, cyclical forms under topological internal change or BIOLOGICAL CHANGE, and energetic,  external lineal, moving change or PHYSICAL change), have not been fully understood and/or properly formalised, since the artillery master liquidated cyclical motion and Aristotle became the ‘bete noir’ of physicists.

Yet even mathematics is founded in logic, the language of time. So we do start with a logical, verbal, temporal, causal understanding of space and time. And such logic though brings a clear definition:

If space is a still picture of time, which we constantly perceive, space is ‘present’, and since it seems to repeat itself, it is a dynamic, reproductive, iterative present.

On the other hand time motion is change with a clear tendency to cyclical inward motions. And so biological change, which last longer in time, is related to the increase of form, of information, that increases in evolution and through the life ages till time reaches an old, wrinkled, inward informative age.

Thus we arrive to a rather simple, obvious fact – time has 3 dimensions of motion:

Past-energy-entropy-disorder< present-repetition (space) > future-information-order.

Philosophically and physically this equation of the 3 motions of time is essential. It defines the fact that we see present still space despite being all a flow of time (since we do NOT see past and future). But it also implies that past, present and future are intimately connected by causal, logic time laws we shall unveil; since time cycles repeat themselves, and so in this repetitive causal logic we find the origin of the predictive power of scientific equations.

As Einstein put it, the separation between past, present and future is an illusion, as time cycles repeat through present moments and that is the origin of ALL the regularities of the universe and the existence of scientific laws.

It also implies that the ‘physicists’, only future (entropy) is just 1/3rd of the equation of time motions.

As all systems grow in information with age, our civilisation, the life beings, the galaxy falling into the formative black hole, technology, etc. And all systems try to iterate its space-time to reach a relative immortality, from quarks and electrons, the simplest time cycles, which decouple into new quarks and electrons, to galaxies which give birth through black hole jet emission to smaller irregular galaxies, ALL MOVES, ALL ITERATES, ALL GROWS ITS INFORMATION, and so we might say all is alive, as those are properties that define life. And this is another huge philosophical change: a pantheist Universe.

But are we right, wouldn’t time be an illusion and spatial geometry more powerful. Not, and this is proved linguistically:

Since logic, the language of time, as Frege, Boole and modern computers show is the mother of mathematics, the ‘causal reason’ of its theorems, since time is more important than space, a mere ‘present slice’ of the total flow of time that seems to be ‘still’ when we take a ‘still present’ picture of it – what we call time.

Thus we cannot shun off as physicists do the logic principles of sequential time and its arrows of ‘information’ towards a future of social organisms, to complete Physicists single arrow of time. Thus to stress this fact of reason, we shall name equations and paragraphs with Greek Letters, latter explained in more detail.

Relational space-time, which we shall call ‘fractal space-time’ was in Leibniz’s mind an astounding intuitive truth, which put in motion with his concepts of analysis and ‘non-euclidean points’ which have breath, size. I have dedicated my entire life of deep thought to convert those intuitions in an all encompassing theory which explains all ‘existences’ as entities made of relational space-time cycles.

It is an amazingly, beautiful instrument, and we have its language – the 3 branches of mathematics that correspond to the fractal structure (analysis) of space (geometry) and time (algebra);  albeit evolved further to define all the postulates of fractal non-euclidean points and all the ‘different motions of time’, and its causal logic (adding the arrow of the 5th dimension, of increasing form and information to the arrow of entropy, and combining both, in present systems).

Thus if physicists demoted time into a mere parameter of space, its parts, we put things back straight to where they belong making space a mere dimension of time.

And as in the case of Copernicus which put back straight the Earth as a mere satellite of the Sun, the simplification and streamlining that ensued will mean a r=evolution of thought, able to explain all the whys and unify all the space-time beings of the universe and its ‘st¡’entific laws.

Fractal, still, ‘present’ spaces as Time differentials: ∂t.

The simplest formulae of analysis and commonest equation of physics is a partial differential equation that portraits a still moment of time, aggregated across space, to form a still picture of the flow of time, a ‘spatial form’.

This stop and go, form and motion duality, is the fundamental law of the Universe; hence the hyper-abundance of its mathematical tools in science – differential equations that measure a still ‘parameter’ on an instant of time.

Further on, still spaces are essential to the mind structure – as it is mostly the mind what stops motion into form to perceive. Hence the importance of ‘relative frames of reference’ in the structure of mathematical physics, and ‘gauging theories’ in particle physics, as all particles seem to ‘gauge’ distances with other particles as they move and most do the stop and go stop and go rhythm.

Further on derivatives of time, still spaces surprise us because of its beauty revealing in the simultaneity of its forms surprising intelligence and organisation. We could think of a chaotic non-causal Universe if it was all motion, as it is more difficult to find patterns in motions. But the stop and go rhythm shows the essential duality of al realities between ‘force-motion and ‘form-peception’. As most of the analysis of science consists in respond to the simple question: where it comes this intelligence of the ‘stills’ of time, its spaces?

This is the theme of this post: how still spaces are created by the freezing of a flow of time motions, how they reveal the network, spatial, mathematical, social numerical geometric intelligence of the Universe, and what all this means.

How spaces be=come, as ∂till instants of a flow of Time.

In that regard, the Ethiopian have a saying: the eyes see the present, the words see the past. Intuitively they understand the fundamental asymmetry of the Universe between present space states, perceived simultaneously through a ‘fast force’ or rod of measure (light space-time in the human case) and the non-simultaneous dimension of time from past to future and future to past, peered in human languages, with verbal times.

As such space has two fundamental meanings: to be a still, present slice of the flows of time; and related to that property, to be lineal, when we consider an ‘interval of space’, as opposed to cyclical time, of which it is a smaller part.

This geometric property is more difficult to understand. But we have to ways to explain why space is lineal and still:

On one hand as a slice of time, space is smaller, and geometry tells us that according to a non-intuitive rule of ‘pan geometry’ (the non-euclidean, larger version of it), lines are small steps, infinitesimal parts of longer curves, as all open trajectories are slices of a cyclical time closed motion.

On the other hand, cyclical motions accelerate inwards, under the generic law of all vortices/clocks of time, Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold vortex). That is the product of the S and T parameters, Vt and Rs, gives us a constant bidimensional manifold. Accelerated vortices thus are in relative terms moving faster than the opposite motion, a lineal motion, which is by definition an expansive, space-creating, slowing down explosion (here we need not to bring mathematical demonstrations. We all know that explosions decelerate as they expand with time, in an inverse fashion to the distance).

Thus cyclical motions are faster than lineal motions and hence they are proper of ‘time flows’ while lineal motions are proper of still space.

|-Space and O-Time thus would be the two relative, pure extremes of realty; and in between we shall find, Ø energy and information, which is the combined form-motion that the Universe also conserves.

Space is thus lineal, still form in its purest sense; a slice of a time function; a decelerating motion, a lineal motion (also a time concept in as much as it has motion) and ultimately ‘something’ we do not perceive in its purest form merely as distance (as a pure line has no form), contradictory as all concepts of the Universe when understood in depth…

The principles of conservation of lineal and angular momentum, energy and information: space and time isomorphism and isotropy.

How this applies to physics? In general if we call a spatial quanta a unit of lineal momentum of each scale and a time cycle a unit of angular momentum, the metric merely means the principle of conservation of lineal and angular momentum.

But even more interesting is the process which allows by multiplication of ‘social numbers’ , either populations in space or frequencies of time, a system to ‘grow in size’; which is the ultimate meaning of travelling through the 5th dimension. For example, when a wave increases its frequency, it increases the quantity of time cycles of the system. When a wheel speeds up its increases the speed of its clocks. And vice versa, when a system increases its quanta, growing in mass, or increasing its entropy (degrees of motion in molecular space), it also grows through the 5th dimension.

And the integration along space and time, of those growths, is what we call the total Energy and information of the system, and so the principle of conservation of this constants and clocks of space-time, is what physicists call the integral of momentum or total ‘Energy and information of the system ‘,which is conserved between scales as we change the acceleration and population of the time clocks and quanta of space of each scale such as:

E=hƒ, E=nkT and E=mc².

In that regard, if the saint grail of physicists is to find the meaning of Universal constants, explained here and its unification equation (studied with 5D metric in the post on astrophysics), what 5D does is a much larger goal – to unify all the sciences, the old dream of Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Leibniz and Leonardo – of philosophers of science. Since now we are ‘all made’ of vital spaces and time cycles, and so we can define for all species of the Universe a common world cycle and ‘generator equation’ of all our motions in time and space, which we will explain in detail in this post.

As each science is just the study of  the species of cyclical time and vital space, of each  scale of relative size, Sp, and Frequency of time cycles, Tƒ, of the Universe.

So if we put them all in a simple scale of co-invariant systems, whose product of size and time speed is co-invariant, we realise that each science is just the study of the species of an specific scale of size and temporal clocks, and putting them together we obtain, the scalar plane of a 5th dimension of infinite scales of size and speeds of time cycles that describe the more general laws of T.Œ with application to all the sciences and worlds of reality.

In the graph, that opens the post, we can see the physical scales of the Universe. In the previous graph, we expanded it to include also biological and social scales, each one studied by a different science, each one with different time clocks, speeds, scales and space quanta or ‘Universal constants’, which however conserve its total quantity of space and time or ‘energy and information’, for each ‘world cycle’ of existence of each species, we study: ∆≈Ei ≈ ∑ Tƒ x Sp

We use for all sciences the concept of a plane of space-time that conserves its overall energy and information, ∆=Ei, which in physical systems we easily reduce to the fundamental principle of all sciences:

‘The Universe transforms Tƒ-Temporal information into Sp-Spatial energy back and forth ad eternal’.

In the jargon of 5D this reduces to: ‘the Universe conserves the content of present space-time of each scale of the 5th dimension’.

The expansion of 5D fractal metric and its laws and Sp-Tƒ elements to the 4 disciplines of human knowledge. Isomorphic laws of all systems.

This means  each plane of relative size has different space quanta (Sp) and different frequency, or speed processing its information through cyclical time clocks (Tƒ). But the product of both parameters is equal. And this allows to travel and share energy and information between different planes of the 5th dimension. Both in physical, biological, sociological and linguistic-mental systems, the 4 great disciplines of science and forms of reality.

Of those 4 scales contrary to belief, the biological and mental systems are the easiest to describe, because they lack uncertainty. We have a first perception of the languages of the mind that create ‘fractal images’, mappings and mirrors of reality. And we have the maximal information about biological systems, as they are closer to us.

The fractal paradigm considers that all those scales are ‘fractal’, that is they follow the same laws and properties. They are ‘isomorphic’. And so it is important to understand that we shall consider for each scale, physical, biological, mental-linguistic (Logico-mathematical) and organic social properties. 

The philosophy of science of the fractal paradigm, which is the ultimate content of those texts as opposed to a mere descriptive quantitative analysis of the ‘visual form of those fractals’, which is what scientists have tried till now, is thus a ‘jump on meaning’, on the search for the whys of that structure.

That the Universe is a fractal structure is a fact proved in all systems and disciplines. What are the reasons and causes of this fractal structure is precisely those physical, biological, mental (logico-mathematical) and social, organic properties.

As the easiest properties to describe for human beings, which are mental, organic, social beings first, and less evidently physical species (our mass, speed and other parameters studied by physics are hardly considered in our daily life, while our social, organic and mental, logico-mathematical, verbal and visual perception, are ever present), contrary to the present philosophy of science obsessed by physical properties, natural to our technological civilisation, those other human properties should come first in the description of reality.

The conservation of energy and information, lineal momentum≈space and cyclical time≈angular momentum.

So just correcting those historic routines, and the conceptual errors dragged from them, the huge confusion of the present picture Physicists have of the Universe can be focused to see reality in all its astounding beauty and symmetry. So far we can save the essential concepts, we just expressed, writing them as follows:

Ei (Total Energy and Information of a system) = ∫ lineal and angular momentum = ∑ (Lineal Space motions x Temporal, angular frequencies) ≈ (abbreviated: ∑ Sp x Tƒ)

So now we have multiple time clocks and multiple space quanta, and while we might use different clocks (frequencies, speeds, temperatures) to measure time and different ‘constant of space quanta’ (H-Planck, k-Boltzmann, Mass) to match those time clocks, we do have that jewel of harmony in the Universe which is the conservation of energy and information (which of course, hawking’s musings break all over the place).

So we can write a very general equation for all the systems of reality made of vital spaces and time frequencies, including human systems, physical systems and biological systems:

Ei (Energy and Information, the quantities the Universe conserves) = ∑ Spaces x Time Frequencies

This simply tells us that the total energy and information of a system is the sum of all its vital spaces, each one with a different natural rhythm of time – measured by its time frequencies, which process and carry its information, in the cyclical forms and frequency of its cycles.

So the information of the universe is carried in its natural clocks – NOT IN HUMAN mechanisms, nowhere to be seen outside the surface of this planet.

Recap. 

The Universe is defined in logic terms by an inversion between its lineal and cyclical time motions.

This inversion carries also to the understanding of two still space forms, the lineal distance and the cyclical form. So regardless of human names we have now 4 fundamental shapes/motions:

|-lineal form and motion, which we shall call, lineal Space or ‘Space’, and Time duration or ‘energy motion’

O-cyclical form and motion, which we shall call cyclical time or Form of information.

And its combinations waves and elliptic bodies that combine both.

The use of the words ‘space’ submissive to those 3 time motions is accessory to the ultimate meanings and inversions of the true reality which is always time. So we shall consider space generally ‘present time’ – a dimension of ∂till infinitesimal time, which is how often appears in mathematical physics.

We shall also consider any ‘still state of reality, which allow us to study the fundamental beat of motion and form which all entities perform (and their dualities between internal static form and external motion). We shall call of space as lineal form even lineal motion (synonymous of duration seen in geometrical space).

This means lineal, decelerating motions (with less long term speed than cyclical accelerated clocks) are often referred as space. Since lineal motion decelerates and becomes still, and spatial expansion and entropy are part of it. And so finally we shall talk of space as an ‘interval of time’, regarded as the relative still, past, dead, region till present, in this final conceptualisation, we could talk of present as the membrane that divides the memorial past and the informative, moving future.

 

In the graphs, the fifth dimension of organic scalar space-time shows how the Universe is formally and structurally social, with an absolute arrow of ‘future’, which is the organisation of individuals into social networks that deliver energy and information to all its parts. 

This again can be mathematised with a simple  metric equation, which defines how all those scales organise systems and social organisms, in a symbiotic manner, as smaller scales code larger systems with less information that deliver energy and motion to the lower scales.

Indeed, as we become larger, our time clocks slow down, and vice versa; smaller systems run faster time clocks, which carry the information of the system, making big and small scales symbiotic; since the smaller scales reproduce the information of the larger systems, which moves the smaller part in synchronous motion.

So chips run faster cycles of information that control machines that move them, genes store our information but the Earth’s gravitational larger field moves us.

But how we are so sure, the scalar structure of the Universe define a new dimension of space-time? Easy. Let us just check the most authoritative definition of a dimension, from XIX c. mathematician Klein:

‘A dimension of space-time exists, when we can move through it, while leaving its parameters of space and time co-invariant’  Klein, on the expansion of Non-euclidean geometries and its new dimensions.

What this means for example is that when you move up and down, your parameters of size in space and inner time clocks remain invariant. So ‘up and down’ form the height dimension.

What if you ‘are’ the space-time that moves, like when a wave of light, which IS the space-time underling the galaxy (the so-called background radiation) moves. Einstein proved it has a constant c-speed, wherever we measure it.

So goes when other waves moves. They doe so with a simple formula: Spe (wavelength) x Frequency (speed of time clock) = K;

 So because precisely the product of the speed of time clocks and size in space of all beings existing in such scale, within a certain connected organic structure are co-invariant, it is easy to define the metric of the 5th dimension (its co-invariant space-time product):

‘Sp (Relative Size in space) x Tƒ (Relative speed of time clocks) = ∆ (constant of a relative plane of space-time).’

That simple equation is the fundamental metric of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time… which encloses all the other dimensions as ‘single space-time’ studied by each science (in the graph we have ‘piled them up’, according to the inverse arrows of size in space or ENTROPY and speed of its time clocks that carry the information of the system, prioritising in an inverse fashion to physicists, INFORMATION, the dominant arrow of the Universe that is NOT about entropic death but growing information and LIFE.

So where it is the 4th dimension of Einstein there?

In science any expansion of knowledge must inclose a previous theory as a ‘limiting case’.

For example Einstein’s relativity is merely the expansion of Galilean relativity and its equation of speed, v=s//t, to include also motions at c-light speed, which as we have seen is the underlying space-time of our galaxy.

So when you go at the maximal speed of the galaxy’s space, as when you swim as fast as the river’s water there are ‘curls’ and ‘drags’, and so Einstein added a factor, ct, to Galileo’s formula, which disappears if you go slow – (when you swim slow in the river, you do not really affect the speed of the river space that much and there are not added effects).

So alas, if you observe the pyramidal graph of layers of the 5th dimension, what Einstein does is to study 2 of those layers, the ones of ‘light space-time’ or ‘quantum layer’ and the one of gravitational space, below it.

And there is where its concepts of space-time as a 4th dimension applies.

All the other layers do obey however the wider metric equation we just have described: Sp x Ti = K, AND IT is that simple because the simpler a theory and the more facts it explains the more truth it is. But do not be fooled by such simplicity, as TO AD the temporal information, carried by those varying clock speeds to the mix, IS so sorely NEEDED, that an astounding amount of facts do happen and become explained.

Let us then before we study what it means to move through the 5th dimension, the nature of cyclical time world cycles and supœrganisms, extended across 3 ∆±i scales of the fifth dimension:

5D best

In the graph, two representations of the scales of stience. We have finally after many changes of index, settled down in an ∆o, in the scale of cellular life, as ultimately the mind-ego is also a small cellular region of the brain, and the symmetry of the limits of cosmos, ∆±4, where perception is visible to man at the Planck and Universal scale, become ‘symmetric’ with a cell-centered scale. But as most of this work spreads for decades behind, the most used classifications are those above.

In the right a scale from 0, the smallest scale below quantum physics, and the underlying o-| game of strings, of time and space. Man occupies then an ∆+4 scale. In the left the most often used scaling with man at ∆o, as an individual. This scale is the commonest on old texts, as it made quite evident the symmetry of form between charges on the quantum scale and galaxies (∆±3), which is lost when we make the cell the center.

 It is ultimately a case of classification of human abstract knowledge. In nature what really matters is the particle/wave/field states for each point of view, above and below, from where it extracts energy and information and so there are as many subjective ∆± scales as beings in the Universe.

To be fully aware of the relativism of scale, however we should use instead of the natural 0 to 10 scales of size from the smallest quanta to the largest cosmos, a much more epistemologically correct graph in which the human point of view is at its center, to stress the deformation of perception by the mind, which ultimately make the galaxy and the atom self-similar. We shall in practice use both indistinctly, as both have a meaning for a certain perspective of analysis.

Indeed, while it might be considered that stiences do not have a hierarchy, hierarchies can be established according to a ‘point of few of knowledge – a certain ontology’.

If we were to consider human survival the most important will of our survival program above any knowledge, we would make of medicine and history the centre of it all. If we worship some ‘partial, reductionist’ shivaite culture of weapons, or physical lineal entropic only explanations of reality you will sponsor the 1 to 10 scale starting in forces. And this scale will have also fruitful uses when reconstructing the relative social future of wholes that co-exist with parts, which appear in time ‘before them’. So the ∆ pyramid of stiences is also an arrow of time of future, social evolution as whole new scales require the pre-existence in time of its parts. So larger beings are older, something seems silly to say but has deep implications in the symmetry of space-time and the way both mess together:

On view of the previous statements, we can consider that science, or rather stience, as it studies always Space-Time beings, has also a scalar structure as each main stience studies the species of a relative scale of different size and speed of time, of universal organisms, which IN THE LARGER WHOLE, WHICH CO-EXISTS IN ALL SCALES, WHAT YOU COULD CALL THE GOD (∞ scales)- UNIVERSE (∞ distance) acquires its full meaning. Then within that being all scales co-exist and interact:

01. Metaphysics, which studies the invisible forces below the light space-time scale; through…

2. physics, which studies the known-known atoms.

3. chemistry which studies its social organisations, molecules.

4. geology that studies larger systems of matter and its parallel biological sciences, which studies cells (bio-chemistry), organisms, (5. biology), among them the human organism (5. medical sciences), its social super organisms (6. history) and those industrial organisms made of metal, called machines, (6.economics that studies the industrial r=evolution of machines)…

In a planet, which is itself merely a particle of a larger solar system studied by 7, astrophysics; itself a fractal point of a galactic ‘cell’, analysed by 8. astronomy, which acts as a unit of a larger absolute Universe we hardly perceive, the largest scale studied by cosmology.

While on top of all those analysis appear ‘scientific religion’ the analysis of the subconscious collective minds of mankind (anthropomorphic, western abrahamic religions of eusocial love) and the Universe (eastern, taoist-buddhist religions of the living Universe).

In the decades old graph, the scales of the Universe and the main stiences that studies them. Part of the systematisation I plan to carry about in this web for future researchers of what should become naturally the philosophy of stience of the III millennium consists on setting exact quantitative and qualitative epistemological structures where to fit all the knowledge developed by mankind in 3 millennia of rational thought.

Yet given the natural decametric structure of the Universe it is easy to classify disciplines of knowledge and species according to scale. Other matter is where to start the order – shall we consider 0 the smallest parts, or the whole infinite that encloses them all – after all as Vonnegut put it infinity is just a twisted zero. In between scales, in both ways we number humans in the middle ‘5’, either counting as above from 0 forces to 10 cosmos or as below, from 0 cosmos to 10 forces?

But shall we consider the human the middle scale or as the perceiver, in the middle, the ∆o scale, numbering with negative and positive indexes (±i) the scales above and below to show the fascinating symmetries according to distance (so for example ∆±3 atoms and galaxies have similar structure, ∆±1 cells and nations also, etc.) We have settled for 01 force, 5 man, and 9 the cosmos in the 3rd line analysis of different stiences, though when considering epistemological themes, we will consider ∆0 to be the human scale.

3 HUMAN scales bestQLLIn the graph, the main planes of existence of the fractal Universe, its clocks of time, and space-time symmetries shown for the human beings, which occupies the relative central plane, ∆0. 

The planes of the Universe write in inverse fashion, depending on which parameter we study, the form or information (form reproduced through motion) of the system, or the size in space or energy (space moving a form) we observe.

The complex Universe is paradoxical, both because the mind is imperfect in its perception (so it stops cyclical clocks of time into forms with no motion, it perceives smaller planes of energy as spatial distances and so on) but because to maintain its ‘isomorphism’, its ‘invariance’  across the different cyclical planes of Times and Spaces, it must take when it gives, give when it take, to stay immortal it must be a zero sum, a place in perpetual balance.

Thus for each Space-time plane, we should really use a dual ‘complex number’ (a,bi), where a would be the value of its spatial scale and b, the value of its ‘informative’ cyclical time scale. In the complex mathematical model of ∆ST this is truth in more than a way (∆-numbers have certain importance when dealing with cyclical time calculus), but we are not going so far in this web or else the i will mean I am the only person ever to read these texts )-;

What we mean here is that both scales are inverse because when size increases time speed desecrates and vice versa.

And so the scale of increasing Size of Space planes, reads as:

S= 1-Force < S=2-Atom < … <5-Human<6-World <….S=9<Cosmos.

While the scale of increasing form or information reads as:

O-Cycles: 1-Local Universe < 2-Galaxy <3-Star<4-Earth<5-Human<6-Cell<7-Molecule<8-Atom<9-Force…

Only Man is in the center of both because it is the relative central plane of existence from where we observe the rest of them.

And yet the logarithmic sum of both or the Existential force of any species of any isomorphic plane, Se x Tƒ = ∆, remains constant. 

This curious paradox comes to full realization when we consider the different ‘algebraic operations’ we can do with the two ‘fixed’ elements of the Universe, its Temporal Form, Tƒ, and its Spatial Size, Se.

One of the simplest ways to classify those cyclical planes is with the use of the logarithmic scale, but one of enormous ‘size-cyclical volume’, the U=10¹º logarithmic scale that converts individuals into Universals of a higher plane of existence. So a minimum of ±10¹º cells gives birth to an organism, the same number of DNA atomic ties gives a DNA molecule, the same number of stars gives birth to a Galaxy and so on. So each Plane or whole will be made of that number of individuals and vice versa, in terms of form, of information, since we do not distinguish more than the whole in a given plane of existence, each lower S-plane will have 10¹º cells/stars/atoms etc.

Thus form, the quantum, discontinuous perception diminishes, but the ‘continuous’ perception that aggregates all those beings into a ‘single whole’ extended into a plane of space increases by the same proportion.

Thus we write in the 10¹º logarithmic scale, 1, 2, 3, 4…. 10 Planes of Space-size, and we write the inverse diminution of information in the logarithmic scale as we increase that ‘continuous’ size.

Then we can do ‘calculus’ of the value of each isomorphic, Cyclical (Tƒ) Plane (S) of Space-time and we will find out (since logarithms ad potencies) the same value:

If we add the relative value of its planes of space and Cycles of form, the sum of any Plane of Space and its Time cycles remains constant. For example for the atom, the value of its relative size is 2, and the speed of its time cycles of form is 8:

Atom: 2+8 = 1o.

For the Galaxy the result is the inverse: 2 is the relative value of its cycles of time and 8 of its size: 8+2=10.

But all of them have the same 10 value, including man: 2+8=10.

However when we multiply both elements to find out the relative Existential Force of the System, from the human perspective: S x Tƒ, things greatly vary:

Atoms and Galaxies again have the same value, 2 x 8= 8 x2 = 16, which is also natural to its relative ‘isomorphism’, as the equations of its cycles (charges and masses) and planes (electromagnetic and gravitational planes) are the same (in the metric of the 5th dimension that unify them both).

The reader who feels confused by those paradoxes, must become accustomed to the paradoxical structure of reality and the metric of the 5th dimension. The dualities of subjective and objective knowledge, of the mind that stops motion and selects form to perceive and map out reality, of the barriers to perception beyond the light-forces of our space-time galactic Universe, etc. etc. We do try to introduce those paradoxes by showing inverse cardinals for the order of space-time planes of cyclical existence, when perceived only as planes of space by size, and only as cyclical forms of time.

Ultimately though the ‘isomorphism’ of reality is precisely the equal value of any Space-Time plane, when combining both parameters. And that is the reason of the absolute relativity of the Universe.

Further on those planes are infinite since as we observe the inverted values of galaxies and atoms, are the same and the metric show that atoms and galaxies do respond to the same equation, so when we enter the invisible regions of 0 information and ∞ size (Universe beyond c-speed of dark energy) and vice versa, the region of perfect form and 0 motion-size (universe of dark matter, below 0 k order), we imagine there will be a new game of 10 planes of isomorphic existence where other beings will have is fractal point of view.

A  5D universe cannot be constructed without 3 arrows of time, to define at least, the present Universe of 4D locomotions studied by physicists with ‘derivatives’ of present locomotions, V(st)=S/T, and the collateral 6 other motions of time happening in the 4Dimensional timespace block.

But also through the 2 UP AND DOWN ARROWS OF PAST AND FUTURE, ENTROPY AND INFORMATION, WHOSE ‘FRICTION’, e x i  CREATES THE PRESENT space-time.

REALITY, the present, ST, is a constant friction of the ∆±1 planes of Spe entropy and Tiƒ,  information to create the energy of the visible universe. As energy, present is conserved, past, entropy and future information must preserve its balance, brutally frictioning the world cycles of lesser beings under their domain. This is the brutal side of living between a membrane of pure entropy motion and a mind with no motion no pity, no purpose but the selfish maintenance of its ∆+1 singular mind-world.

In the graph, the 3 arrows of space-time considered from the perspective of the 5th dimension, upwards in the pyramid, the ‘arrow’ of FUTURE, or wholes, as they co-exist with the smaller beings, and hence, as we increase the complexity of the 5th dimension; the arrow of entropy, with its inverse to the previous arrow, and the arrow of ‘present space-time, which is EACH OF THE PLANES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION, OR width of the pyramid.

When formalising the 5th dimension it is important to have first a bio–logical understanding of what it means in terms of causality in time, and relative entropy and information to move in one or other direction.

Indeed, what a whole achieves is simultaneity of action in space, over smaller being. Its domain thus must manifest a coordination and higher speed in space, without entropy or disorder when it integrates the motion of its parts.

To that aim the parts must be able to absorb and process information faster than the whole, so its variations and fluctuations at microcosmic scale become a smooth function or ensemble of undistinguishable synchronous continuous beings in the whole ∆+1 scale. The symbiosis due to the paradoxical inverse properties of beings in two ∆±1 scales of both arrows is what makes wholes and part stick together to the point that both become one.

The fifth dimension is an organic dimension, ruled by two inverse parameters, the implosive, informative time clocks that store the information of the system and shrinks them in space, and the entropic expansive motion of parts, which want to become free of organic wholes that quiet them and absorb part of its information as territories of order of its informative networks and forces.

As parts must come before wholes, in any ∆±1 scales, the ∆-1 scale must be considered the relative past of present, ∆-scales of relative future, ∆+1 wholes.

Once this is established, as ∆-1 relative past spaces are made of herds of ∆-1 faster wholes than the future, co-existent larger planes, of ∆+1, we can wonder how the whole controls the masses of ∆-1 parts. And this is achieved by two rough methods, confinement and fields of massive energy and information distributed as waves to the whole ‘reservoir’ of ∆-1 cellular/atomic network points.

The fifth dimension has therefore 2 different motions: one of information from lower atomic, genetic and memetic scales which is reproduced upwards, and one of motion and whole management provided from upper wholes and its ‘physiological networks’ of energy, reproduction and information, whose fields of hormonal and nervous messages, program by simultaneity the whole mass of cellular/atomic/citizen elements of the supeorganism (biological/physical/social).

A Holographic organic Universe, a new paradigm of knowledge.

Thus,  we introduce in this blog the elements of the fractal, organic structure of the Universe.

Through history of knowledge 3 philosophies of reality have dominated human thought:

  • The first mythic age of subjective, anthropomorphic thought made man the center of the Universe made to the image and likeness of a personal, human-like god.
  • Objective, Greek science denied this selfie ego-trip of the human being and made of logic Nature, the ‘Mind’ of an organic, fractal cyclical universe,  of which we were all  imperfect ‘images’ (Plato).
  • This holistic vision of Nature has always permeated its perennial, scientific philosophy, but the excessive development of mechanisms to measure time (clocks) and space (telescopes, microscopes) enthroned in the XVI century, as humans learned to measure more accurately the world with those mechanic senses,  a simple mechanist model with the machine as the measure of all things, the clock, the absolute measure of  time, which reduced all the processes of time=change to simple locomotions in space (physical time change: t=s/v). Machines now measured time with a single absolute clock (Newton) and space with a single telescope. So science ditched human verbal time and visual art, as forms of time-space knowledge, and dethroned the organism as the measure of all things. Mechanism was born.  Further on, as machines measured ‘lineal distances’ and ‘time was a single infinite clock’, the cyclical concept of time=change, with 2 dimensions yin and yang, ‘information’ and ‘entropy’, form and motion, mind and body, was lost. A cycle requires two dimensions to form, a single line clock only one dimension and one measure. Yet this age of mechanist simple science ran into growing difficulties in the XIX c.

Further on in the XX century quantum physics and relativity found that vacuum space was quantised and had energy and time clocks were many with different speeds. So the single clock single space single time hypothesis was broken. We were in a Universe of infinite cycles of time, with different speeds, each one breaking space into ‘quants’ surrounded by the time ‘membrane’, making reality a fractal complex organic Universe. How to explain it?

  • It is then when Evolution and a complete different concept – time as change of information not only of space motions proves the key ‘forgotten time dimension’ needed to close a cycle and explains the other range of changes found in nature. Since.  there were more forms of change=time besides locomotions  and to understand biology, economics and history (Darwin, Marx, Schumpeter) we had to study changes in the information of beings, not only in its entropy and energy. So a new paradigm of science opened, with the understanding of dimensions of form, of information, of a scalar structure of space, of multiple time cycles that carry that information, through fractal non-euclidean points and networks.

All this is being resolved mathematically in small details but we still lack the whole model and a philosophy of science and the Universe  fully upgraded, beyond the ‘deist’ and ‘mechanist’ age of science into a fully organic, fractal model of multiple quanta of space and time cycles, with both arrows of future time=change, entropy and information and its ‘energetic, present combinations’, CREATING ALL BEINGS OF THE WORLD

Existence between planes

The biggest ‘dark world’ to the human @mind seems to be the understanding of other planes of existence, given the fact we perceive in a single plane of space-time, and have only discovered the other planes through the use of instruments, telescopes and microscopes.

Yet stience which essentially is the study of all the species of the Universe in its details, according to its belonging to those ∆Ξlanes has been with us for 500 years. aND YET, the understanding of the scales of existence and the relationships between ‘particulars and universals, parts and wholes, atoms and networks, cells and tissues’ – the laws between ∆-1 parts and ∆-wholes.

Planes of existence is the proper philosophical term, used in this 1st line to define them, as we exist travelling in size from seeds to individuals to social wholes. We are an ambulatory collection of some trillion cells, citizens of a super organism of some 7 billion humans:

3 scales

In the graph, we see the 3 main scales of human existence. Scales are thus organic, and each being and its Œmind will co-exist in such 3 scales, whose interactions cycles, exchanges and reproductions of energy and information, aggregation and dissolution processes are the stuff of which existence is made.

Now in as much as we are a ternary being in space-time, through 3 co-existing scales, managed by a ŒMind language, mapping constantly the world around in terms of the language and its embed ¬æ program of ‘exist’ence, we can define a quite interesting fourth scale – that of the mind that perceives itself in time through a language, software, which expresses as the most suitable for survival the will of the program of existence and its space-time actions, becoming the logic knot or mind itself that guides the being

So our mind is our I=eye<Wor(l)d, the language itself, reason why in the same manner a seed of information, called semen can reproduce our body, the language-mind can be reproduced through teaching, master-student, parents-sons. We are constantly reproducing and preserving information, and the way those flows of information egos selfs minds and languages which mimic the ultimate language of them all ‘ the mind of god, the game of existence itself, in its naked beauty and symmetries’, go on living and reproducing its thoughts and visual and emotional (inner body actions), brings about what we call ‘being’.

So being never cease because through fractal planes we reproduce seeds and pieces of ourselves constantly through our actions and reproductions of wor(l)ds and seminal genetic and memetic forms of in-form-ation.

This is again the essence of reality as all motions are indeed topological reproductions into a lower scale, which reforms its reorganisation of part or the complete whole.

Screen Shot 2016-04-03 at 20.31.55

In the graph, the constant reproduction of information through travels to the past to a seminal seed, electromagnetic wave or memetic book, which will reproduce and emerge as a larger whole define the essential ‘business’ of planes of existence, the reproduction and emergence of beings across such planes, with a generic ¬Æ Generator:

O∆ (father) < O∆-1 (seed of information) ∑O∆-1>|∆(young offspring)

The reproductive beat of a father from a larger scale, ∆, which produces an informative seed, O∆-1 in the lower relative past, cellular, particle or memetic scale, which will thereafter reproduce back to the future an organism, ∑∆, is a ‘classic’ of ¬Æ motions through the symmetries of space time (∆,∑, ≥ ≤), which determine the possibility of communicating and transferring information into a replica of the @mind-being. Yet for the process of palingenesis through scale to happen, information must be run faster in lower scales, and an immanent content to the ‘will of the mind’, a program of @tions and survival must exist as ‘immanent’ to the space-time beings, when they form.

In the graph, information and energy are different arrows=directions on the scalar fifth dimension of the Universe. Departing from an original ‘same’ amount of ‘base energy’, in the relative ∆o scale perceived by the ∆i being, new codes of information create new virtual whole existences, emerging on the support of relative past forms of space, stretched through present waves of reproduction of information into co-existing simultaneous, organic whole-planes, where that energy is tied as information of linguistic mental mappings of the self.

Immortality of the fleeting, derivative present of finitesimal monads

It is only present what you are, that fleeting infinitesimal, ∫ Åœ ∂s; sandwiched as you are between your simultaneous derivative present space and your integral of actions, your world cycle, a mere fractal point, Œ, §upœrganism at best, mostly ∆•st of space-time… Immortality does not belong to us but to the eternal game, which is found in the remote past, the point of maximal entropy and the absolute future, the point of maximal information, the yin and yang, Lord Visnu and Shiva, the destroyer of infinite present worlds that will be repeated ad nauseam.

Immortality in that sense seems not to be the privilege of present, except by the sheer boredom of its eternal repetitions, as the present is too dumb to create more than a few forms of the whole potential of the language… but of past, the void and future, the form, which as present moves, rebalance themselves, with the trick of death:

Equation of Death:       ∆+1<<∆-1

A jump in which information disappears in ∆+1 and enters ∆-1 as a wave of pure motion entropy, a big bang.

So the derivative flow of future form, slowly compressing reality, is jumped out by the equation of death, E=mc2, in the physical space.

Indeed, how they do it. How future jumps into the past to die? How the flows of form, dissolve into nothingness of existence, knowing though they will be potentially reborn by the sheer number of infinite similar happenings, on the 5D block DETERMINED BY THE SIMPLICITY OF THE GAME AND ITS LIMITE COMBINATIONS COMPARED TO THE SIMULTaNEOUS NUMBER OF GAMES BEING PLAYED OUT IN ALL THE PHYSICAL SCALES OF REALITY.

HENCE THE infinity of happenings, and the limits of the happenings allowed, bring the discotnous immortality of the game. THUs this means after we die, we jump too not only in entropy but in information at least a scale up to the one of gods?

THIS BEAUTIFUL QUESTION ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF GOD AND AFTER LIFE, WILL BE STUDIED in the part of God, last post of this blog.

Nt. We use normally for the 5th dimension the symbol ∆, in terms of time dynamics, which are more hierarchical as it is indeed an arrow ‘head’ put upwards, to symbolise time themes of the space-time fifth dimension.

We shall use, ∑, with its ‘summitry of populations sense, its 3 planes (the one in the middle merely suggested, and its five vertex points and perimeter – one opened) as a good symbology to understand the fifth dimension ins pace. And finally when studying 3-dimensional super organisms, we talk of 3 organic Ξlanes and use the greek beautiful symbol for those 3 organic planes with the self in its center.

From this simple scheme we can deduce many properties and interrelationships between the 3 arrows.

Since energy is topologically a hyperbolic wave, in terms of time causality a present form, dominant in space, we do have therefore a science of waves, iteration, present and entropy. Which are the GST equations that matter here. This means as we know from ¬ æ, we are dealing with differentials, which are ‘finitesimals of present space-time:
Energy: ∫Max. ei∂s∂t
Information: ∫Max. i e ∂t∂s
The equations are self evident. As we deal with ∑dimensional scales…. so we integrate finitesimal parts. But when the system we integrate has maximal entropy over information we integrate giving primacy to energy and viceversa.
Those are thus as usually the primary equations of the generator, that define the 2 arrows of time in most physical equations, which are derived of them.

But as we know things get more complex in an even more detailed analysis of interactions as EACH DIMENSION O THE BEING AND THERE  ARE 3 IN TIME-AGES, 3IN SPACE TOPOLOGIES AND 3 IN ∑ SCALES, can be studied with the same comparison of its arrows; and further on, if we come together with several individuals forming a new bigger whole, much more information is added as each 10 dimension can now connect with those of the other being. Those are examples on how complex details an get, infinitely complex very fast:

QLLIn the graph, the repetition of the actions of beings under laws is a deterministic notions. The actions in fact turn around balanced exchanges of energy and information, measured with different clocks in different scales (E=hv, =knt = 1/2 mv²).

In classic science the parameter of energy, is closer to the concept of the sum of all time motions of a system and as such closer related to time. Here we use it closer to the concept of kinetic energy, and in general ‘within the wider mark’ of the concept of Spe, |-entropic motion. To be more exact thus as energy and time are the 2 elements of an action, we will try to use as much as possible the correspondence principle and clarify those differences as we go along those texts.

in essence, 2 planes of energy and information as ‘fractal planes’, which have ‘endure’ a process of dissolution or evolution, as dictated by the 5 postulates that convert back and forth, points into lines, waves, networks, topological planes and Mind-organisms, will change their clocks of time and their clocks of space, into slightly ‘fractal different’ but ‘self similar’ clocks. So in quantum physics the constant of action and time clocks are E=hv, energy then becomes in the quantitative mode of science a very good parameter, once we deepen its philosophical meaning to measure more than the ‘entropy field’ in which the system moves, the ‘storage of energy in the body’, the ‘body capacity, and often even the ‘total existential force’ of the being. But as we move from plane to plane, the system changes so deeply from atoms, cells, and citizens into wholes, networks, crystals, organisms, societies, that the parameters change. An interesting region in that sense is that of the ‘collapse of a wave into a point’ or ‘point of emergence and birth’ and viceversa, the point of death and collapse of a system between 2 planes, since death turns out after careful examination of data for all systems that it implies a fall two ‘∆-scales’ into minimal organisation:

Death: ∆+1<<∆-1

How indeed the game of existence is performed in each network-creation of similar mind selves that will knot flows of energy and information, increasingly creating a virtual mind-emerging reality on the fiction that they do exist, that all those monads self-serving communicating similar mind distorted knot views are real enough to command a domain and start to magically distort around a self-fixed point of view, enough whirlwinds of exi=st-ences as to be of note to the whole and become more than virtual real, generated in reproductive radiations upon eternal time.

In the graphs, the scalar dimension of space-time, generically called in these texts the ‘fifth dimension’, is an arrow of future time ‘upwards’, in the creation of wholes and ‘dissolution’ of wholes into larger, smaller, less informed parts downwards, to the relative past. As such it establishes a generic time arrow towards social evolution into the future, and allows systems to travel back and forth in that time arrow as they complete a world cycle of existence between its generation as a seed of an ∆-1 seminal/atomic scale into its social, emerging whole, ∆, existing in an ∆+1 world, from where after gathering information and suffering an imbalance of energy in its 3rd age, will explode back into energy, in the moment of ∆+1<<∆-1 entropic death.

image002

In the graph, human existence is a travel through 3 scales of reality, the biological, cellular, individual and social scale, in which life surfaces ’3 times’ as a fetus, an individual that belongs to a society and then returns back to its simpler cellular life in death.

Existential world cycles can be written as a travel back and forth between 3 planes of social existence, the i-1, cellular, i-ndividual and i+1 social scales of the being. As an entity emerges into the relative future ‘upper potential scale of existence’ to which its individual cells are blind, a new existential ternary role is ascribed to the being, which will perform in i+1 its energetic, reproductive, and informative, social cycles. Then after death this ‘existence’ as a whole in a ‘plane of reality’ of a larger ExI (st) reality of energy and information exchanges, on a higher SpaceTime, ST+1, FADES and the being looses its information as ‘real’. The loss of information in the Universe is thus a taboo broken by GST. Information is constantly destroyed, and yet because the number of potential combinations of it is limited, it constantly re-appears in similar form. Only the ego and the mind that tries to still and stiffen information into linguistic mappings and then re-orders ∑∆-1 quantum into a larger whole, can account for the ‘persistence of memory’, of forms with genetic, quantum and memetic blue prints (biological, physical and social structures.)

The layered 3rd and 4th dimensions. The mathematics of planes of space and cycles of time.

How those planes of existence build their social planes, of space.

Now, there has been much confusion on the meaning of dimensions, since Minkowski grand nonsense in conceptual thought, established departing of its useful mathematical equations of 4-vectors, the concept that time was a dimension of space.

What those 4-vectors show truly is a series of Sp=C/Tƒ, and  Sp=Tƒ, maximal, minimal and steady points of the 3 ages and symmetries between space and time. Albeit the time 3 ages/motions are integrated into a single lineal time duration and loose most of its meaning. So for each of those 4 vector equations, its fundamental S≈T symmetry must be studied departing from space-time symmetries. That’s all.

The relationship of time and space in those vectors is thus just one of essential balance and symmetry between the 3 vectorial dimensions of space and the 3 ages of time, sequentially added by duration.

Another expression common to mathematical physics are relations between the fundamental parameter of lineal motion, speed, and cyclical motion, density of an scalar, whose product is the flux of a quantity.

All these equations of dynamics require a specific analysis of which dimensions are seen as dimensions/distances/areas/ volumes/membranes/topological forms and which one are seen as time, motions, rotary or lineal or wave-like motion, and so a lot of conceptual analysis on how the human observer quantity a given space-time symmetry and its dimensions/parameters of motion/distance is needed.

Yet there are generic models which allow us to extract clear formulae of combination of motions and forms in the construction of being. The 3rd dimension of pure form or volume, for example is obtained through the layer accumulation of bidimensional, think membranes along a gradient of accelerated time vortices, from relative max. S x Min. T past upper layers to inner ones, as density increases.

This new ‘dimension of motion and form’, is thus a dual dimension which intersects with the membrane and creates a 4 dimensional ‘vector’, whereas however it should be considered the existence of two densities of form, the gradient towards the center and zero point and the motions within one of the perpendicular, ‘normal’ layers or planes of space, along the time, integrative gradient direction of the vortex.

4 dimensionality must be seen generally as a holography of space-time bidimensional forms with motion.

We can also consider a 3 fixed form dimensions, the 2 of each layer membrane normal to the dimension of the time vortex, its rotary dimension and gradient dimension.

Now what matter is to observe that any of those diverse formulations of an event in terms of higher form and motion, gradient, curl, divergence or any multiple vectorial spatial or time tensor equation to describe the event and form on space-time can be reduced to an interplay of motions of time dimensions and space forms along the rules of 5D, Œ,Æ, non-Euclidean geometry, existential algebra and 5D metric.

In the next graph we see how new dimensions are added by adding 2-manifold layers which create the ‘3rd dimension of depth, gradient, and hierarchy between those layers, established in equipotential surfaces of similar value, which in detail appear as relative ‘planes’ of minimal curvature, as we saw the Earth for millennia:

LAYERS

Now the growth of planes of existence has in its simplest mathematical meaning an obvious limit:

it grows in pairs, often of space-time (complex plane of binary numbers), or by superposition in the Cartesian-hyperbolic Plane, of weaves and present space-time systems, of SS combinations, or in a polar plane for TT combinations.

So the Planes of bidimensional numbers permit bidimensional forms, but THERE ARE NOT TRIdimensional numbers. The next level is the plane of quaternions, ‘OBVIOUSLY MOVIN IN THE 5TH DIMENSION’ as it is not-commutative as motions in 4 dimensions are.

So we have a simple guide for the first steps of construction of worlds: to know that numbers are social groups of any kind of points, growing in the fifth dimension, and to know that the complex plane is an space-time plane, where the angular frequency mounting the plane of space, sucks in as i does on the negative square part of it.

We can in that ensue consider the geometry of Einstein, where time rest -c2t2, considering time ‘i’, -c2x-1 = +c2.

Thus what the Einstein metrics write really is: Ds²=x²+y²+z²+c², that is ‘speed not time’.

The description of this complex plane of a space-time 4 dimensional system can be done also with quaternions as a single block, but it is hardly needed, as what humans are more interested on in the exchange of relative energy and information, loose terms in the verbal mode for spatial energy, or lineal planar motions and cyclical, repetitive harmonic oscillators of information, cyclical motions, hence created at least with 2 points (as 2 points in the postulate of geometry of the cycle suffice to create one).

In the graph, we can understand better the meaning of a bidimensional Universe in which the 3rd dimension is made by a sum of bidimensional layers where the relative X≈Z>>Y structure extends over an equipotential ‘democratic’ surface clone ‘œ-points’. Then the gradient of a given force or flow of information structure them in the ‘hierarchical dimension’, normally of Height, where the ‘strongest’, energetic point is in the lower center and inversely, the highest informative, most perceptive observer point in the upper layer.

So on Earth, the outer membrane or continental crust hosts its highest informative points, human heads, while the center stores the most energetic=massive atoms, an iron core, probably seeded of high density uranium-lead crystals.

The bidimensional structure is common to all systems, which have an outer thin membrane that breaks the inner vital space and outer Universe. It is not however an absolute concept, as there is always a gradient which allows transfers between layers or social classes, but this osmosis that transfers momentum between them normally is far thinner, slower than the communication between atoms-particles-heads of the same layers.

And so changes of layer membranes require an existential ST effort, either an increase of energy or information (in the inverse gradient of both formal motions). This case is illustrated by the electron ‘plane waves’ which constantly vibrate around the atom (Schrodinger’s equation), but can change layer by an Energy impulse.

Thus in this manner the Universe adds a 3rd dimension of depth that gives volume to a bidimensional system, and also new forms of motion, which the classic model of physics group all together into the concept of the 5th dimension.

Dimensions grow as systems grow and multiply. So paraphrasing cheng-tzu, the Chinese philosopher, from one, Tao, ‘time motions’ comes 2 ‘space forms and time motions’, yin and yang, space lines and cyclical forms’ and from 2 comes 3 varieties of space-time, which give birth to the infinite beings of the Universe.

The 5th dimension.

5d bestyes

Can we classify those ST actions according to their form and purpose? Yes we can. The 3rd element of T.OE, the 5th dimension orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical space-time ‘formal motions’.

Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = C.

And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and co-existence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.

5D Metric: co-invariance of size and time speed – the generator equation: Sp x Tƒ = C

Now in a universe of infinite ‘world cycles’ of time, there must be a way to order them. Indeed. If there are infinite speeds of time cycles. So we need to order all those world cycles that require to study all those different sizes and speeds of the cycles of time of the Universe. But to do so we need to encase all those fractal space enclosed by cyclical time’sin scales of size from micro to macrocosms and the actions beings perform within scales, in a mathematical, simple ‘metrics’ of space-time. This formalism is what we call the ‘5th dimension’: a series of laws that order the infinite species of the Universe according to their size in space, and the speed of its cyclical actions in time.

Thus, the fifth dimension metrics is the ice cake element needed to order a fractal Universe broken up into an infinity of beings made of vital space and time cycles (of body-waves and particles-heads). Only then we have a scientific model able to order it all, with its bio-topo-logic properties, isomorphic laws and 5D metrics. This can be done since all those systems of ‘spatial energy’ (body/waves) and temporal information (particle heads), can be roughly classified by ‘size’ in space, and ‘speed of motion and action-reaction’ in time.

Then a ‘new rule of order’ appears: bigger systems move slower than larger ones. Their clocks and metabolisms tick slower. This is a Universal law: mice beat hearts faster than elephants and particles turn faster than galaxies. Yet the product of both, the spatial size and temporal speed of any system remains co-invariant. So we can write in a first approximation: S x T = ∆±n and define a 5th dimension of scales of size that organize the Universe from past, smaller, faster systems into future, larger, slower systems. Moreover, for the first ‘time’, we find a clear arrow from a relative past to future, as wholes cannot exist without the evolution of simpler parts first.

Can we classify those ST actions according to their form and purpose? Yes we can. The 3rd element of T.OE, the 5th dimension orders the different speeds of time clocks and sizes of the Universe. Its metric allows us to order all those lineal and cyclical space-time ‘formal motions’.

Since bigger systems (galaxy) run slower than smaller systems (DNA) which carry more information, but both are invariant together, Sp x Tƒ = C.

And this invariance is the origin of the order and structure and co-existence of all those different systems of the Universe, as the growth in size is balanced by the loss of information and vice versa.

Thus, the third element of T.Œ is the understanding of the fractal structure of space-time, divided into infinite scales of relative size and speed of information, which are inverse but co-invariant, meaning that smaller beings run faster its clocks of information, coding larger beings (so genetics codes biological systems and quantum numbers material systems), whole larger beings move slower but can synchronize with its huge bodies a myriad of little beings (so the Earth guides the evolution of the information of its beings, with its weather cycles of energy and the black hole guides the informative vortex of stars and planets towards its centers with its gravitational waves).

In the graph we see the fundamental 3 scales of reality, the gravitational slower scale the human thermodynamic scale and the atomic, genetic scale.

This 5th dimension and its formal metric are the key to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe, as the 3 ‘canonical scales’ of all superorganisms of reality, physical and biological systems extending through ∆±1 scales of the 5th dimension (ab.∆), the quantum-cellular ∆-1 plane, the ∆ i-ndividual/thermodynamic plane and the ∆+1 organic, gravitational planes.

The fifth dimension orders all those scales of size and speeds of clocks into a ‘metric system’ able to explain all kind of ‘motions’ and ‘actions’ that take place in isomorphic ways in all those systems.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

Since any cycle has the logic properties of repetition, which are the origin of the patterns, we call ‘science’, whose completion breaks space into an outer world and an inner ‘vital space’, whose ‘gradient center’ is the ‘point of view’ of the system that gauges the external information of the cycle.

As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5th dimension’ of scales of space-time (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNA-cells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.

And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a self-centered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5th dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a self-centered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stock-market’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.

But in the same manner cyclical time and fractal space applies to all systems of all sciences, the 5th dimension and its metric apply unlike ‘physical concepts of space-time’, such as c-speed deformations of time essential to 4D metric, to all systems NOT only far removed scales of physical time.

5D metric can explain from faster metabolic rates in smaller animals, with faster time cycles; to faster information processing in smaller chips with aster time cycles (Moore’s Law), or faster rotary options in smaller masses which have paradoxically faster rotary, attraction properties (rotating Black holes and quarks).

What it will be difficult for this writer after 20 years of exploring all the possibilities of this TŒ, and the immense number of questions resolved by it, is to ‘organize’ all that new knowledge in a manner that the reader does not get lost, due to its ‘encyclopedic extension’. Tƒ that aim when this blog is partially finished sometime during 2016, if he follows the top sentences, all should make sense.

Thus we give a general look to this TŒ in this first post, studying its 3 main elements: ‘Still, lineal, slow spaces’, ‘fast, cyclical time vortices’ and the 5th dimension which organizes them through the co-invariance of spatial size and time speed: Sp x Tƒ = K.

So we talk of a ‘fifth dimension’ of scales, which has a hyperbolic geometry with the lineal limit of quantum physics and the cyclical limit of cosmological gravitations, along which an infinite number of time cycles enclosing vital spaces, exist, in an orderly fashion provided by the metric of the 5th dimension.

 

Thus, the third element of T.Œ is the understanding of the fractal structure of space-time, divided into infinite scales of relative size and speed of information, which are inverse but co-invariant, meaning that smaller beings run faster its clocks of information, coding larger beings (so genetics codes biological systems and quantum numbers material systems), whole larger beings move slower but can synchronize with its huge bodies a myriad of little beings (so the Earth guides the evolution of the information of its beings, with its weather cycles of energy and the black hole guides the informative vortex of stars and planets towards its centers with its gravitational waves).

In the graph we see the fundamental 3 scales of reality, the gravitational slower scale the human thermodynamic scale and the atomic, genetic scale.

This 5th dimension and its formal metric are the key to fully understand the organic structure of the Universe, as the 3 ‘canonical scales’ of all superorganisms of reality, physical and biological systems extending through ∆±1 scales of the 5th dimension (ab.∆), the quantum-cellular ∆-1 plane, the ∆ i-ndividual/thermodynamic plane and the ∆+1 organic, gravitational planes.

The fifth dimension orders all those scales of size and speeds of clocks into a ‘metric system’ able to explain all kind of ‘motions’ and ‘actions’ that take place in isomorphic ways in all those systems.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

Indeed, what we have just described logically IS not only the fundamental particle of physics, but the fundamental entity of any biological, social system – the key to the unification and understanding of the Universe, as a whole and all its parts, self-centered entities of time-space that put together create the puzzle of the Universe.

Since any cycle has the logic properties of repetition, which are the origin of the patterns, we call ‘science’, whose completion breaks space into an outer world and an inner ‘vital space’, whose ‘gradient center’ is the ‘point of view’ of the system that gauges the external information of the cycle.

As such the understanding of the time cycle, its interaction with its vital space and central point, and its synchronization and social evolution with other time cycles into larger wholes, which structure a ‘5th dimension’ of scales of space-time (so particles become part of atoms, surrounded by electronic cycles, which become part of molecules, surrounded by thermodynamic cycles, which become part of masses, surrounded by cyclical gravitational fields; and the same process brings DNA-cells surrounded by protein membranes, with a vital cytoplasm space between them.

And yet those cells, then become the internal vital space of a larger whole, your organism, surrounded by a membrane of multiple life cycles, your sensorial skin, which has once more a self-centered point of view (frame of reference in mathematical physics), called your brain that gauges energy and information. And yet again, from the upper scale of relative ‘sizes’ that we call generically the 5th dimension, you are just a moving, open, ‘free’ individual, however enclosed by a membrane called a ‘frontier’, part of a vital territory called a nation, with a self-centered point of view, called a capital and a president, king or dictator, or in capitalist societies a ‘stock-market’, which controls the system and gauges its energy and information.

But in the same manner cyclical time and fractal space applies to all systems of all sciences, the 5th dimension and its metric apply unlike ‘physical concepts of space-time’, such as c-speed deformations of time essential to 4D metric, to all systems NOT only far removed scales of physical time.

5D metric can explain from faster metabolic rates in smaller animals, with faster time cycles; to faster information processing in smaller chips with aster time cycles (Moore’s Law), or faster rotary options in smaller masses which have paradoxically faster rotary, attraction properties (rotating Black holes and quarks).

What it will be difficult for this writer after 20 years of exploring all the possibilities of this TŒ, and the immense number of questions resolved by it, is to ‘organize’ all that new knowledge in a manner that the reader does not get lost, due to its ‘encyclopedic extension’. Tƒ that aim when this blog is partially finished sometime during 2016, if he follows the top sentences, all should make sense.

Thus we shall try to give a general look to this TŒ in this first post, studying its 3 main elements: ‘Still, lineal, slow spaces’, ‘fast, cyclical time vortices’ and the 5th dimension which organizes them through the co-invariance of spatial size and time speed, Sp x Tƒ = K.

So we talk of a ‘fifth dimension’ of scales, which has a hyperbolic geometry with the lineal limit of quantum physics and the cyclical limit of cosmological gravitations, along which an infinite number of time cycles enclosing vital spaces, exist, in an orderly fashion provided by the metric of the 5th dimension.

10 logarithmic scales.

To notice that the 5th dimension is based on 10 logarithms because the ‘Tetraktys’ is the most perfect group of 3 x 3 + 0 elements, which become specialised in the ‘Sp-energetic, Tƒ- informative and ST-reproductive, iterative functions of the ‘Program of survival’ of all systems, which will be made clear latter on, when we analysed the world cycles of time and the ternary Generator equation in space and time, of the fractal Universe.

You have to be a bit patient, as we have first to ground all this in some basic mathematics. Thus between 2 such scales of the 5th dimension we shall always find around 10¹¹ elements – the ties of a DNA molecule, the stars of our galaxy, the cells of a super organism, the galaxies of the perceived Universe, and between the Universal Constants of Space, we will find the same differences, the energetic value between the H-planck constant of Tƒ in the ∆-1 quantum scale and the k-Boltzmann constant of the ∆-Thermodynamic, human scale; and then the µ-magnetic scale and  so on.

So this said, the 5th dimension is in the holes of the real numbers each of its decametric decimal a lower scale of the 5th dimension. Yet as usual those numbers should be really cut every 10 ‘decimals, because then we enter into another scale where anyway the values of constants such as Pi, and √2 vary as Lobachevski’s proved.

This is made clear just by revising a simple number, e, but a key number for the derivative, proportional emergence or descend between scales, approximately 2.718281828. to the 9th decimal. The reader will observe that actually those 10 numbers form a simple series, 2.7 18 28 18 28 repetitive in extreme (except the first decimal missed by one to make it a perfect 28-18 variation, but after the 10th decimal it breaks, with 2.7 18 28 18 28 45904 etc. That is, the equivalent to the loss of meaning and yet one more of the so many proofs I have found of the existence of the 5th dimension, its geometries, algebras, and mind forms, circular membranes, points of view and ternary organic parts.

Indeed, e x= [(1+1/n)n] x is the only derivative which is proportional to the same number, since if we take 1 the whole and n, one of its finitesimal parts, in space, a quanta, and then repeat this growth of diminution an n number of time, and an x number of social scales of the 5th dimension, we shall find the emergence processes or dissolution≈ death processes of most systems of the Universe.

The quantitative scales however always yield in its meaning to the functions, and ternary symmetries we shall discover that make possible the existence of all systems as combinations of 3 ‘scales of the 5th dimension’ (quantum-cellular, thermodynamic-organic, gravitational-social), 3 synchronous topologies and 3 diachronic ages, so we soon will write the Generator Equation of Space-time Beings:

Γ.  ∆-1: Sp (young-past-entropic limb/field) ≤≥ ∆:ST (iterative, adult, present wave-particle) ≤≥∆+1: Tƒ (future, informative head/particle)

This simple structure and all its fractal variations is essentially the description of any World-system, whose sum creates the Universe: U=∑W

Relational space-times thus have the key word ‘relational’, which merely means we need a ‘metric system’ to order and relate all those space-time cycles of the Universe.

And this is the 5th dimension of the Universe: the metric laws that put and order, RELATE to each other all the time-space cycles of the Universe, of which we are all made.

Fractal space and renormalization.

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 19.48.42

Screen Shot 2016-04-05 at 11.13.46

5D space-time cycles means basically that reality is a fractal. This means all is self-similar, ‘affine’, fractal, isomorphic, self-similar words. And so somehow all can be described with similar properties under ‘transformations’. For example:

An image of a fern-like fractal that exhibits affine self-similarity. Each of the leaves of the fern is related to each other leaf by an affine transformation. For instance, the red leaf can be transformed into both the small dark blue leaf and the large light blue leaf by a combination of reflection, rotation, scaling, and translation.

Those 4 operations are the essence of physical studies of material fractal systems. The methodology of physics consists in studying systems that are ‘invariant’ under rotation or time motion, scaling or 5D motion, and translation or space motion and reflection or Space-time motion.

However NOT al systems are invariant under those processes, in 5D physics there are ‘antisymmetries’ of time (from birth to extinction, which are inverse actions) and hence asymmetries in space (as the 3 elements, Sp, ST (ST) and Tƒ are different topologies). And in 5D there are ‘reversal roles on motions upwards and downward, so similarities happen, when we jump two scales.

So physicists ran into infinities because they could not accept fractals. For 80 years, they found an infinity in an equation and just got rid of them!

The early formulators of QED and other quantum field theories were, as a rule, dissatisfied with this state of affairs. It seemed illegitimate to do something tantamount to subtracting infinities from infinities to get finite answers.

Freeman Dyson argued that these infinities are of a basic nature and cannot be eliminated.

Dirac’s criticism was the persistent:

‘Most physicists are very satisfied with the situation. They say: ‘Quantum electrodynamics is a good theory and we do not have to worry about it any more.’ I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation, because this so-called ‘good theory’ does involve neglecting infinities, which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This is just not sensible mathematics.

Feynman wrote: Having to resort to such hocus-pocus has prevented us from proving that the theory of quantum electrodynamics is mathematically self-consistent. I suspect that renormalization is not mathematically legitimate.

Today they found a ‘fractal philosophy’ to accept getting rid of infinities, which ARE scalar ‘finitesimal’ numbers of an ∆-n scale. Today, the point of view has shifted: on the basis of the breakthrough renormalization group insights of Kenneth Wilson, the focus is on variation of physical quantities across contiguous scales, while distant scales are related to each other through “effective” descriptions. All scales are linked in a broadly systematic way, and the actual physics pertinent to each is extracted with the suitable specific computational techniques appropriate for each.

Thus, one of the immediate consequences of the formalism of 5D cyclical time and fractal space is to set the record straight on physics and its ill understood 3 modern ‘ideas of time’. They are further understood in terms of the arrows of future-information, past-entropy and present-reproduction and its infinite fractal cycles in 5D metric.

The reduction of the 6 motions of time to a single external translation, where time merely is used to study the change in the speed and position in space of a being in lineal fashion is NOT a truth of Nature, but a truth of artillery masters, which once formalized became a canonical formula that excluded all other time formulae.

So this locomotion, described merely with a single mathematical formula by Galileo, V=S/T, converts Time in a parameter of space, S=vt, or in Einstein’s-Minkowski’s version, S=ct. This means that as ‘things that are compared must have the same dimension and form’, Time must acquired the fundamental property of space, which is to be a lineal, open extension. And by reason of this fictitious linearity of time, to be converted into a perfect line which is an Euclidean parallel extended to infinity.

The 6 motions of times thus became a single mode of change, their cyclical clock-like form, a lineal parallel, the finite duration, an infinite lineal duration that ‘walks’ along an infinite space line. And both written in an abstract Cartesian single plane of reference, which in paper seems to extend to infinity and be unique, became the absurd concept of an infinite space-time continuum, that only exists in the imagination and the paper in which the model was drawn.

The Euclidean Mind of light-space. Kant.

Newton indeed believe mainly in 2 things: Yahweh and absolute lineal time and space, a background abstract reference set up by God, who talked to him with comets.

So he studied the Cartesian graph, when reading ‘La geometrie’ which he acknowledged was the beginning of his interest for science.

But for him the graph and its lineal coordinates were not merely the human mind-world, but the graph that represented ALL of reality, which he blew to cosmic proportions and affirmed to be the graph of the absolute Universe and its space-time. This is NOT truth, and we will bring here a simple proof, derived from Kant’s realization that we ‘see light space-time’, because the ‘human mind is Euclidean’, which latter influenced the perception of painters, creating impressionist, as they realized also that we do NOT paint reality but light, THE RELATIVE SPACE-TIME our electronic eyes measure:

A light quantum has the 3 perpendicular dimensions of the informative electric field, the magnetic entropic field and the lineal c-speed that reproduces the wave. And those are the 3 exact perpendicular dimensions of our perceived space, as our eyes are electronic and feed on the information of light – hence also establish light as its fixed rod of measure or constant space, (relativity) but the universe has multiple world-views, and some are non-Euclidean (gravitational worldwide) some are atomic (smelling worldview) etc. Human eyes and mechanical eyes though are electronic, and their bits of information visual, hence Euclidean:gravitationalwavesbestintermediatespace_image002

In the graph the Euclidean world is caused by the 3 perpendicular arrows of light space-time to which we add the social colors. 2 more elements are needed to define our human space-time, first the organic relationships between our electronic eyes that feed on light, and the properties of information – as information is perceived in stillness, in an stop and go motion, similar to that of a film – so electrons go and move as waves, stop and feed and perceive light as particles, entangling its distances with other electrons in ‘fixed’ distances. Hence c-speed is always constant, our rod of space, as relativity proves, without giving the proper i-logic explanation.

It is indeed essential for the reader to understand that linguistic mappings, stifle and deform the objective similarity of all beings.

So all kind of distorted images that carry a certain truth are possible, and relatively correct, but ONLY an objective analysis from the widest possible perspective, will make sense of all of them.

This widest Theory Of Everything, naturally can only be proposed by a Philosopher of Science, whose task is precisely to understand all the varieties of ‘formal motions’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ in space and time, measured by the infinite frames of reference of the Universe.

While each science and scientist will study a particular form and type of species in its detail, with more or less deformation according to the linguistic models it proposes, its specific ‘ego-centered paradox’ and the ‘worldly profession’, it engages with. Which of course the Philosopher of Science must also explain, to the chagrin of the different ‘Religions’, ‘Cultures’ and ‘Minervas of the North’, and the sure solitude that will engulf his work.

So how can we differentiate subjective truths, and biases? To that aim the philosopher of science has created the ‘Scientific method’, which the likes of Aristotle and Descartes established, and the likes of Galileo and Newton usurped and deformed.

But as we said all relative truths carry certain information, which is valid to create a mapping of reality and that is why subjective versions of reality do work and remain standing. Indeed, Ptolemy could perfectly establish the orbits of planets with the Earth at its center, just adding epicycles. But it was a very complicated motions. Thus Science considers the fundamental ‘tool’ to distinguish a higher objective truth from a subjective one, called Ockham’s razor: the simplest theory of reality which can explain the maximal number of facts is a more objective truth.

This was the merit of Descartes, the true founder of modern science, which we have upgraded to our ternary analysis of all systems of the Universe, in what we shall call, T.Œ, the Theory of the Organic Everything, as all those ternary systems made of cyclical times, lineal spaces and self-centered territorial points of view that organize them, will show clear ‘organic patterns in its form and actions.

Let us then, keep narrating, the next installment of the history of western thought, and its duality between the Philosophers of science, who know better vs. the Physicists, who have more power – explain in modern terms the findings of Descartes, with the help of the new mathematical tools of topology and fractal geometry those discoveries, in more detail.

We are all relational space-time beings.

10-cyclic-times-1024x499

In the graph time cycles divide space into an outer and inner region, which becomes a broken piece of vital space, surrounded by the ‘membrane’ of the time cycle – a ‘space-time being’ – the fundamental entity of the Universe. So the first big discovery of analyzing the Universe with the more complex concept of cyclical times, is to realize that we are all made of broken vital spaces with motion, commanded by logic, cyclical systems of information.

We shall state something that should be obvious but it is not, deformed by the lineal measures we make WITH time clocks: time clocks always run in cycles.

All time clocks are closed cycles, paths or knots that return to its origin, closing the cycle. And so they break space into an inner and outer region (fundamental law of knot theory and topology), creating an infinite array of cyclical membranes that close a vital space, forming the infinite beings of the universe we shall call knots of time cycles (mathematical jargons) of space-time beings (physical jargons) or species of energy and information (biological jargons).

A magnetic field acts as the membrane that protects a mass or electric field of points particles (reason why magnetic fields do NOT form monopoles, that is not their function).

That is, why time cycles will appear structurally as membranes that close a vital space and break reality into Space-time entities, of which the Universe, a puzzle, sum of those space-time beings is made.

The sum of tics of your heart gave the entire life of a human; the total number of cycles of a ball or wheel gives the lineal displacement of a car. The regular, repetitive patterns of those cycles are the origin of the so-called laws of science, which is able to predict the future of the species it studies because they do repeat their orbital time cycles, the circadian, biological cycles, their reproductive life cycles.

But as they say, the devil is in the details. So the question to start our inquire is how exactly are we made of vital space and temporal cycles?

Obviously we all exist in a finite time between conception and extinction, and we all occupy a ‘region of space’, we carry with us. And then there is always the I, of the ‘we’, the point of view to create order among all those motions and form. Let us then put the 3 together in an organic, meaningful way.

We say that time is cyclical motion/form and space is open, lineal motion/form. As this is the truth of it, physicists despite using different names have found the simplest theoretical elements of their models are open strings (of space) and cyclical strings (of time).

Yet there is a 3rd element on those Universal systems, which is by far the more interesting and less understood, which physicists of course also use in all their theories: the mathematical frame of reference, or zero point, the center of the circle, the point-particle that ‘gauges information’, without which again not a single theory of physics can be understood (it is the point of the inertial frame of reference that ‘measures’, the cause of their physical theories which are called for that reason ‘gauging field theories’).

So now we can expand our definition that ‘time is a cyclical motion and space a lineal open motion’. And affirm that:

“All what exists is a combination of open’ vital’ spaces, enclosed by membrane-like Time cycles, which are centered in a fractal particle –point that gauges and process energy and information from its relative still frame of reference’.”

The 3 topologies of all Universal systems: vital spaces, cyclical membranes and o-points of measure.

So we find in the Universe always 3 elements in all systems, which correspond to the 3 ‘topologies’ of mathematics, and the 3 ‘ages’ of life world cycles (since life is cyclical ,changes in time are NOT worldlines as physicists believe, but world cycles):

  • The vital space of lineal motions, enclosed by the cyclical membranes and time cycles, focused in a central point of view or frame of reference, of maximal density of information that gauges information, linguistically and has the structure of a Non-Euclidean, Fractal point, through which multiple ‘parallels of energy and information’ can cross.

This ‘mind, soul, god, monad, Maxwellian Demon’ that creates the order of the Universe will be then defined by a simple mathematical equation and geometry as a 0-point, whose function will be to maintain the whole system ‘stable’; that is in biological terms ‘to make it survive’. It does not need to be conscious, but as Leibniz described it in his work on monads, apperceive mathematically, vegetatively or linguistically, because simply speaking, Evolution implies that a system which ‘maintains the ‘whole’ stable and survive lasts on time. So automatically as time goes, ONLY systems who had this ternary efficient, symmetric, stable configuration have lasted, have been selected.

This definition, when translated to mathematical physics, coupled with the Principle of Relativity as defined by Poincare-Einstein, ‘we cannot distinguish motion from stillness’ will allow us to derive all the laws of Physics and explains its main systems. So for example, an atom has a central point of view of maximal density; but it has the advantage that can be applied to all other sciences, to define all the laws of knowledge.

In the graph, a few of the ternary systems, made with the 3 only topologies-functions of all systems of the Universe, an atom, a tomato, a planet, a cell an embryo and an electromagnetic field. Though at first sight their resemblance might seem a mere coincidence, all of them are ternary systems, which we can describe with the same ‘Generator equation’ of ¬Æ mathematics, the formalism of T.œ (the Organic Theory of Everything, which unifies all sciences as descriptions of such systems in any scale of the Universe).

All of them will be made of:

– A central, informative point, seed, or o-point that gauges energy and information, connected to a membrane or time cycle…

– That encloses an open, entropic field of lineal motions-distances that displaces the system.

This seemingly simple structure, however has infinite variations and ‘biased deformations’ from each point of view and language. So in science we shall always observe the complexity of the details of each variety of the ternary ‘organism’, and specially the enormous inflationary number of ‘linguistic mirrors’ that reflect and deform this vision creating particle subjective Worlds out of objective uniformity of reality.

Consider for example the laws of electromagnetic fields:

circular motion

We define a quantity called the circulation as the resulting speed of the liquid in the tube times its circumference. We can again extend our ideas and define the “circulation” for any vector field (even when there isn’t anything moving). For any vector field the circulation around any imagined closed curve is defined as the average tangential component of the vector (in a consistent sense) multiplied by the circumference of the loop. And as Feynman puts it: “With just these two ideas—flux and circulation—we can describe all the laws of electricity and magnetism at once. ”

But then again, in biology we can describe in time the birth of life as a process of creation of membranes holding a field of carbohydrates.

And finally in both, field theory and biology we will find a central point of view, the charge or the DNA will appear, accelerating the informative process of evolution of the system.

Thus the approach of the philosopher of science to the Unification of all systems, is one that includes together the 6 motions of time of Aristotle, its cyclical patterns of generation, evolution, growth, diminution and extinction, along a 5th dimension of relative sizes and speeds; and of course, the 6th motion or Locomotion, in lineal space, which however will turn to be the less important for ‘meaning’ of all of them.

This is what the Universe is all about, and the only difference is the jargon each science uses to describe it. Do NOT think that because physicists speak mathematics, biology, genetics and evolution, societies religion and politics, economists money, they ARE describing different things.

Now if we were to speak the most beautiful of all those jargons, as it is the language of all those beings, Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian i-logic mathematics, the needed upgraded 2300 years overdue of the sciences of logic and mathematics that will allow all those of you who are NOT only ‘selfies’, self-centered life cycles and can take the necessary bashing of all your ‘beliefs’ to relief your slavery to childish thoughts, we would define those 3 elements as the ‘only 3 topologies of the Universe’ and write a Generator Equation in terms of topological geometries:

|-Toroid limbs/fields > Ø-Hyperbolic body/waves < O-Informative particles-heads

This simple topological equation defines how the 3 parts of all beings are constructed. And remember if you are a mathematical physicists that the universe has no more topological forms than those 3. So all what exists will be a ‘diffeomorphic’=local assembly of those 3 topological parts. And you just need to fill the names of that geometrical template. An atom will have a O-nucleus, an |-electrons and a Ø-hyperbolic body-wave of neutrino, gravitational and ¥-electromagnetic waves between them.

This simple statement ‘enlightens’ your understanding of an atom and a galaxy and completes 100 years of quantum physics and relativity. Take it or leave it.

I shall prove ad nauseam, as ‘master ludi’ of all languages and sciences that NOT a single science escapes the ternary symmetries defined by the Fractal Generator of the 5D space-time Universe and its structure.

The goal of GST: TO EXPLAIN IT ALL AS MOTIONS IN 5D PLANES.

IN THE DEEPEST, SENSE the unification of sciences as ‘stiences’, which study space-time, informative existences, unified by the common properties of space and time and its ¬æ logic laws of behaviour can be formalised very simply as a series of reproductive motions between scales, which often return to the same emergent scale through a swing up and down the Ξlanes of existence. 3 lanes though define a plane, 3 points define a line, and so we can grow through the postulates of i-logic geometry, from fractal points into networks of lines which are flows of energy and information to build up a new network, which surfaces as a whole through up and down, fractal reproductive waves of information:

image023

The description of that process itself can be done from different ∆±i perspectives: depending of the scale, thus a method of mathematical populations and statistics come to the rescue of ‘big data’ (far away scale in which the number of similar beings as information diminish on them, focusing in common properties increases), while the fine-tuning perception on close range in the same ∆@ SCALE is much deep in individual analysis and breaks through in an even more fine-tuned, internal ∆-1 scale to the observance of each action and space-time cycle performed by the cellular parts or the being in its ‘fractal time’.

Whereas we mean by fractal time, the fact that time ultimately is the sum of a series of frequencies of space-time actions of ±e, i exchange and ∑>social evolution (reproduction, organisation)… So we can in fact consider each ‘world cycle a fourier transform’ which would yield in detail at least 5 different frequencies (often resumed in the observance of 3 or even 2 only), which is what the whole is made of in time. So time also ‘fusions its parts into whole new ‘pitches”, which then can be broken into informations So happens when an envelope wave comes through a series of smaller waves.

Waves organisation in that sense is perhaps in each of its two versions, cartesian and polar coordinates (as a particle then), the fundamental mode in which time ‘fragments’, space-time finite discontinuous actions, peg each other in some adjacent manner that we see a contrast of meaning and information between them.

DIFFERENT MODELS OF TIME MOTIONS AND TIME BEINGS.

The different models of reality..  1, 2, 3, 4 time-motions vs. 1,2,3,4 space dimensions.

In the previous post we have introduced the canonical analysis of 5D fractal space-time cycles as a symmetry of:

  • 3 time motions: Pa>ST>Tƒ
  • 3 spatial forms: Sp<TS>Tƒ
  • 3 scales of the 5th dimension: Œ±1.

The main of those symmetries is the i-logic geometry of 3T≈3S.

Since  according to relativity all motions can be seen as still space-dimensions and vice versa.

This fact gives multiple possible models of reality, according to how many dimensions of motion and form we study, and give i-logic mathematics many methods to resolve a problem either by topological/geometric or dynamic/differential methods.

For example, if we restrict ourselves to a canonical 4D world (a single space-time Plane), the following are proper models of reality.

Holographic Universe:

One of 2T dimensions (height and beat) ≈ 2 S (length and width) which studies the holographic interaction of those 2 manifold structures, which will study how a plane of space, evolves into fast cyclical rhythms and growth along the height dimension (evolutionary fast and slow time). This concept is put to good use in cosmological 5D physics, as indeed the Universe is a flat surface of ‘space’, where as Einstein put it, ‘time curves space into masses’, vortices with height in its densest black holes at the center of galaxies.

One of 3 dimensions of space and one of ‘lineal time’,  where height becomes a spatial dimension (classic mechanics and most human sciences).

One of 4 dimensions of space in which time is frozen as it is converted into a space parameter (Relativity, where we talk of a ‘block of spacetime’).

One of 4 dimensions of time and 0 of space, in which all dimensions are in motion.

The physicists view: 1 time motion.

Physicists define time=change, only as the lineal motion or translation in space of beings, IGNORING ALL OTHER MOTIONS=CHANGES, biological, social, mental motions=changes. so they define time by a rather simple formula of external motion in space:

– Vc=Sp/∂Tƒ, an immediate deduction of our concept of space as a still cut of reality or moment of time: Sp=∂Tƒ-> Sp/∂Tƒ=C(v). Einstein would merely do far more precise calculus departing from that simple formula.

EFE equations however are – how couldn’t be otherwise – cyclical :), so they are difficult to calculate without huge computers, despite its conceptual simplicity; and thus to trace the motions of multiple bodies in space, and calculate its time derivatives, physicists new v=∂s/∂t, is difficult. But what is more worrisome it is not really ‘that’ important to understand time=change, specially the biological, social and mental processes of time=change and evolution).

Ultimately we must reverse the order of importance between space and time. Physicists are using time clocks merely to measure translations=speeds in space, ∂t=s/v; hence they considered time a parameter of space (the so-called 4 Dimension of space).

But T.Œ reversea the importance of both parameters, making the flow of time a sum of still spaces, which is how the mind, ultimate source of knowledge ‘sees’ space.

So  space is an instant’ of the flow of cyclical Time, ∂Tƒ, a mere ‘still’ of Time.

∂Tƒ=Sp/v

And obviously this means there are much more important issues to resolve about time=change, that the mere study of ‘present slices of time’, the so called space-time of Einstein’s equations, just the ‘differential sum’ of a series of little steps of time, which this mathematical operation called ‘differentiation’ could only calculate when the ‘changes’ were smooth. But the true evolutionary, informative, life-death cycles of time had ‘brusque’ changes which cannot be calculated mathematically (differentiated). What are those other changes?

Since Aristotle we know there are other ‘modes of change’, such as internal change in the form of beings, studied by biology far more important for human understanding of time=change.

Minds ‘slow down to a halt’ the perception of those time cycles to map out and store their logical paths in the brain, and how they use them to ‘forecast’ and ‘create’ the future changes of reality.

And there are the social changes and evolution of memes (technology, cultures) with its rhythms tabulated by Historians (Khaldun->Vico->Spengler) and Economists (Marx->Schumpetter->Kondratief).

And so there are in fact at least 4 clear modes of time-change, physical, biological, mental and social change regulated by different types of clocks:

  • Those of ‘energy-mass’, which curved physical space,  to create ‘charges and masses’, attractive vortices of time and physicists had yet to unify in its different clock-speeds; since as Einstein put it ‘time curved space into mass’. Now it seemed to me obvious that each attractive vortex of space-time or mass was a cyclical cosmic clock, the sun, the Earth, the black hole; and each attractive vortex of electromagnetism, or charge was also a cyclical clock of a much smaller, ‘faster’ scale of reality. So the Saint grail of Physics, the unification of those 2 vortices of 2 different forces, attractive charges and masses lay in front of my eyes. The only question to resolve being: how to relate the faster smaller clocks of nature (charges, beats of small beings; vibrations of atomic clocks) with the larger clocks (rhythms of cosmic bodies, galaxies, planets, larger living beings).
  • Further on those larger beings, were organised by the after smaller the genetic and organic clocks of biology. So Nature did take advantage of the difference of speed in its clocks; to coordinate those scales. As I had discovered that information was merely the static perception of those clocks of time, and so smaller clocks which had more frequency could store more of it, a plan of Nature revealed to me: smaller systems coded larger ones, quantum equations coded physicochemical reactions, genetic clocks and logic cycles coded larger cells and organisms.
  • And human individual platonic ‘eidos’ =forms (wrongly translated as ‘ideas’), which today sociologists call memes coded larger, slower societies (I used then the Greek term and the word ‘phenoculture’, but after the popularisation of the word ‘meme’ I have adopted it). So faster mental languages mapped reality and triggered the memetic evolution of societies.

It is then absurd to use only a linguistic tool, mathematics, to calculate only single ‘change’ that of motion, ignoring all the organic, mental and social cycles of Nature.

This physicists can not even or wanted to comprehend, as their only tool of time measures is Einstein’s refinement of Galileo’s V=s/t: ds²=x²+y²+z²-c²t², the importance of the more complex reality of a Universe of 3 time cycles, which all beings trace during their existential longer ‘world cycle’.

 Other forms of time travel

However in Æ, all combinations are possible of those 3 elements, <>≈, ><≈, ≈<>, and this is one of the many examples on how ‘rich’ is the new logic of time and its ‘expanded’ capacity to explain multiple events, with the new ‘time-space operations’ available in this expanded Universe.

This means we shall be able to explain by combining in different forms the 3 ‘speeds of time, Vs, <; Vt, > and Vst, ≈; all kind of time travels along the 4D of a single space-time plane or in multiple space-time plane motions, such as translations in space, never explained before (Zenon paradox).

In any case, the 3 motions of time, which can and are constant played, disjointed, do follow normally a sequential timing of 3 ages, <, ≈, >, or young age of energy, adult age of reproduction and old age of information, proper not only of life systems as we thought, but with the expanded concepts, to all forms that exists. Thus we can consider a simple function of existence or ‘Worldcycle’:

Œ  <≈≈> Sp>ST>Tƒ

Which we shall see all systems follow. And we can ‘fill in between’ those symbols of existential algebra, or ‘operandi’, space states, or ‘forms, such as:

S(x): Function≈Form in space <≈> Operandi: motion/transformation in time: S(x): function, state in space, which shapes the sequences of time motions in existential algebra.

What we see thus is a series of basic beat between stop and go, form and motion, space and time:

Φ.  S >T <S >T <S >T

which now becomes converted in ‘languages of thought’ as equations of Ælgebra, such as the composition of a system with 3 parts, or the Universe as an infinite sum of such ‘symmetries of space-time’.

That Is:

U= ∞ Sp <ST>Tƒ

An example of physics.

Now the fundamental difference between quantum physics and cosmic physics is the duality between discrete and continuous descriptions of reality, which in the mathematical language refers to the difference between arithmetic numbers (discrete information) and geometric lines (continuous motion).

Quantum physics have ‘spooky’ effects that can be resolved easily with an organic paradigm (the wave-particle collapse being the most vital – as it means the collapse of a herd into a whole, when in danger bombed by the observer – in the point of maximal density, as it happens with armies and schools of fishes  and entanglement the most fascinating – as it means the translation to the lower faster gravitational scale of the message as you are receiving from my home in relative instantaneous translation this message code in light form).

But there are properties which are truly ‘really’ quantum properties. And the discrete, numerical nature of its parameters is the most relevant one.

The explanation of it, should now be obvious to the reader: quantum physics is quantised because we are measuring its stop and go rhythms, natural to the very structure of space and time. Moreover, as we, the observers observe information in stop position and extract information by stopping what we observe (so we make still pictures of moving objects and the focus increases in detail when we have a slow motion on the observed objective), we observe quantum systems and its ‘observables’ (position and momenta) in stop and go steps.

This is what we mean by quantised observables. The most obvious case being angular momentum or ‘spin’, the minimal observable of the quantum Universe,

Now we must consider in more detail another essential feature of the relationships between time and space; its synchronicities between the different space-time cycles of a system.

In this case we talk of the synchronicities between the two orbital numbers of angular momentum in both scales, the cosmological and quantum scale such as we often find a direct relationship of quantised ‘rotary cycles’ or internal time cycles of the being and outer orbitals or external time cycles of the being such as:

∑ Length of rotation (internal spin) = Length-Time of orbit.

This simple relationship seems to have been lost to those who talk of quantum physics as weird. It is not, since COSMOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ARE ALSO QUANTIZED, THE Earth is quantised and the quantic number is called 365:

365 ‘rotary frequencies’ = 1 orbital.

The spin of an electron in that sense is also quantised or rather ‘synchronized’ just with a different formula:

The spin=rotation or angular momentum, S, of any particle is quantized. The allowed values of S are:

S = √s(s+1)

In contrast, orbital angular momentum can only take on integer values of s; i.e., even-numbered values of ∆.

And now the big question: why THERE ARE MORE QUANTUM values than the single orbital -spin relationship?

The metrics of the 5th dimension: Sp x Tƒ = K…

This means small beings live shorter life cycles. Thus an electron does NOT live eternally. This concept is just uncertainty of perception, as a series of generations.

Because the life span of an orbital electron is much shorter than the one of a planet, as it is far smaller, in fact there are several generations of electrons observed in a quanta of much longer human time, and so several values are allowed. So what we see in quantum physics is NOT an immortal electron, as physicists  think.

We do see several world cycles:  a series of lives of electrons, which therefore as if we were to see multiple lives of planets, will occupy several different allowed orbits around the sun-quark nucleus.

Yet when observing the quantum world and its much faster world cycles of particles they appear as a single particle as one generation follows other, undistinguishable.

So in the same manner we would see the same person from far and long living in the same house for hundreds of years, even if it is the son, the grand son and so on, because we cannot distinguish from far identical particles, similar generations, we do think is the same electron.

The same happens with the electron nebulae. We are seeing several generations of a fractal electron in space, simultaneously.

For example, the old testament describes Mathusalen and others, living 800 years (which we shall see is the long cycle of a human civilisation or tribe or nation between birth and war extinction).

So the bible uses for several generations the same name in time, and sometimes as when it Names Jacob, for the whole tribe, multiple people of a tribe have the same fractal name in space. So this ‘biblical reckoning of multiple populations in space and generations in time with a single name’ applies to quantum physicists, who think the same Jacob(i)-Hamiltonian describes a single electron, when there are thousands of them.

Thus there is a deeper truth here we shall constantly observe: the same processes and paradoxes of time and space happen in all scales and all observables.

Still space and the Principle of relativity

And yet we see a fixed Universe? Why. Here 2 elements come together, one virtual – the mind’s equation, O-mind (still) x ∞ Universe of motions = linguistic mapping of reality – and one real – the stop and go, motion and perception, workings on reality needed to ‘gauge’, measure and make sen-se of it all through the sen-sorial, sentient properties of reality. But does time stops then in the mind-perception of motion as still information? And in the stop and go processes of all systems, when switching between its active, energetic and passive, informative dual states? Not at all. “Time motions” switches from motions happening in the external ‘absolute space-time frame’ or world of the system and motions happening in the internal vital, relative space-time of the being.

So when we perceive we are still and focus the perception of the small pixel-quanta of lower ‘5D scales’ of reality from where we extract information. Time never stops means it must switch between ‘states’. So for example in Chemistry Mehaute proved that when energy flows stop, information, form increases its ‘vibratory repetitions’ in the molecular field. Leibniz was able to stop for 3 days his motion, static in a chair meditating to obtain with the motions of his brain the awesome concepts of his work, as the brain is pure fat and electric inner faster motion. So intelligent, ‘nervous people’ consume more energy and are picnic, thin.

Now absolute space-time should be called more properly ‘the world’ – that is the external Universe in which an entity displays its actions. And that was the original name given by Descartes to his abstract frame of reference. He affirmed it was the frame of reference of the human mind not THE ONLY one in the Universe.

Yet because the mind only sees its world and it sees it in stillness, that whole Universe of infinite motions conflicts strongly with the ‘human mind’s limited perception’ of it. And so even in physics that pretends to be neutral ‘frames of reference’ are essential to ‘measure’ and the results and equation greatly vary according to the frame of reference we choose, of which there will be obviously 3 – the ‘still, spatial, ∂t’ perception of those motions – planar, toroid and polar perspectives.

The absurd talk of physicists about ‘the fundamental particle’ (which seems to be some short of solid, non-moving Parmenidian thing) when all particles are ‘vortices of motion’ (including masses and charges), that is species of accelerated time clocks, or its arguments on the beginning of time and the death of the Universe explained with only one type of motion (entropy, expansive motions that dilate space and slow time, according to 5D metric, Sp x Tƒ = C), show more than the ‘stupidity’ of Physicists when handling ‘concepts’ (granted) the general limits of the human mind that structurally looks for ‘fixed forms’ so does not understand pure motion, (what moves is the first question they make – answer: a rotary motion that seems a still particle), are just aspects of that structural mind. However the founding fathers like Descartes were aware of it.

Problem with modern ‘naive realist’, ‘reductionist’ mathematical physics is that they are neither aware nor they care to understand the limits of their studies, increasingly ‘robotised’ by their A.I. models of reality, ‘memorising’ data.

This blog is obviously the inverse of that tendency. Leibnizian pure grey matter working on conceptual level to enlighten A.I. equations.

In that sense, to the 3 motions of time we must add the ‘concept’ of ‘perception’ of motion as a ‘still form of space’, which is the only way in which ‘information’ can be properly transmitted with accuracy. This is the Postulate of Relativity in which all Physics is based from Galileo through Poincare to Einstein. And so ‘endophysics’, the introduction of the ‘perceptive frame of reference’, which stops time into spatial images, appears in science from the beginning. We shall constantly remind the reader of those truisms, however hidden by the ‘abstract scaffolding’ created around the ‘frame of reference’ of absolute space-time, which deforms all perceptions of reality.

It is then necessary to remind the reader also of Godel’s inconsistency theorem, which can apply to all languages and theories, and the famous quip of Einstein to Poincare, ‘I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’.  Poincare, which made the best enunciation of relativity, and we can here rewrite: ‘we cannot distinguish a form in motion from a motion with form’.

That is, minds often cannot understand if a system is perceived in stillness as ‘space’ or in motion ‘as time’, depending on the relative speed of perception and speed of motion of the observer and the observable. So if the observable is very fast in relationship to the ‘minimal quanta’ of time in which the mind perceives reality simultaneously as space, ∂t≈still space, this fast motion will be converted into a dimension of distance or a solid particle, as we see car lights in a still picture of a night road or wheels of spinning bikes as solid disks. Space thus is created as still pictures of simultaneity in a given quanta of time-space of a certain mind’s reference frame.

The consequences of it in mathematical physics are the equations of relativity which adjusts the different ‘frames of references’ and ‘speeds of simultaneous perception’ of the human mind. There are though much deeper consequences in physics, due to the errors caused by lack of conceptual understanding of relativity principles, and the differences between space and time states. So certain ‘time forms’ of ‘trans-formation’, such as the weak force are erroneously presented as spatial forces; and certain time states of particles, as the 3 quark states or the 3 neutrino states are studied as spatial forms. So are the 3 solutions of EFE that describe the 3 ages in time of the Universe.

This is a fundamental correction of many physical facts and events taken as space and viceversa, and a general rules that phenomena happening in still space will have parity and bilaterally, that is will tend to be even, while time phenomena will have ternary, odd elements (though the rule is not absolute it means that the 3 quarks are temporal states, so fast that seem space to observers, but the 2 states of the nucleon proton-neuron are spatial, that is co-exist in the same point of space forming ∆-p pairs.

You see, in absolute space-time all seems definite and explained but truly when we go deeper there are MANY fields which are hardly explored or full of mistakes.

In other fields, specially all those related with the mind – perception and syntactic of languages, mathematical structure etc. the consequences are immense.

And vice versa. If the perception is so fast and the entity so slow and large that we cannot perceive it all neither any of its cycles, the being will seem to us also pure space without time rhythms, as it happens with rocks, planets and galaxies.

It is worth to notice that in both cases the spatial mind tends to deform reality substituting time motions for still spaces, because that is the natural bias of all minds: to see it all quiet, still, death space.  Yet the way it does it with small faster beings and larger slower, wholes follow the equation of 5D metric, Sp x Tƒ = K, and its two inverse arrows.

Thus there is growing information and speed of time, in lower scales and that speed becomes frozen by lack of mental capacity to see the etials of motion. Yet in both cases the mind suffers the inverse error of confusion of time events with space; also for larger spaces and slower time speeds in bigger wholes.

The arrows of information and energy.

In all space-time scales species follow a future arrow towards more information, which increases in 3 horizons and finally evolves individuals into societies, herds and macro-organisms, related by a common language/network of information.

The process of evolution of species is equivalent to the 3±st ages of individuals with a twist: death is not the only ‘solution’ to the cycle, but the duality of ∂-disintegration or ∫-integration of a social group (in the case of life a cellular group), which defines the life/death cycle gives two choices to some ‘top predator’ informative species: After its 3 horizons or evolutionary ages the species might become extinct or transcend into a super-organism.

In the graph, the seminal, 1st species packs a lot of information in minimal space: It is the Worm Hole, the chip, the 1st bilateral animal2, the 1st mammal, the horse and the 1st Homo Sapiens, which seem to have evolved from a dwarf ancestor, which first discovered technology and had a dwarf brain, albeit with an evolved morphology similar to that of the Homo Sapiens: the Homo Floresiensis.

Then the new ‘highly informative’ top predator follows in its evolution a plan of dimensional evolution that transforms species with a high content of energy into species with a high content of information through 3±i horizons, self-similar to the ages of an individual organism. Since species are, in fact, macro-organisms in which each cell is an individual of the species.

-First in its ‘energetic youth’, the species grows in size as horses, humans, bilateral animals or black holes do.

-Then the species suffers a reproductive radiation colonizing new ecosystems.

-Next the species suffers a speciation, according the ternary principle into 3 subspecies, one dominant in energy, another in information and a 3rd one balanced in both parameters.

– Finally, a new top predator extinguishes the species or the informative one evolves into social organisms of different complexity, stronger than the individual and survives.

Further on, evolution, as the analysis of the complex plan of ‘speciation’ shows, has two paths: social evolution of ‘external’ energetic bodies (the herd-state, of lesser efficiency and higher spatial extension) and social evolution of ‘internal’ informative organs.

In cells, this give birth to the two main arrows of cellular evolution: muscles, single cytoplasmic cells with multiple nuclei; and neurons single, dense nuclei with multiple cytoplasmic branches (dendrites).

In Physical systems to ‘quark condensates’ (neutron and black hole stars) vs. molecular, external fusion.

Finally in the evolution of species, we have also the causal rhythms between the dominance of each arrow, similar to the ‘ages’ of life, as a species is the life of a ‘cellular’ parental father, reproduced into multiple individuals that will become extinguished, often substituted by a son-species (Oedipus paradox). And the rhythm parallel to that of climatic change is simple:

Small informative seed (first small species-fetus)-> Energy feeding (growth) -> The young age of the species/individual shows a growth in size -> Reproductive/radiating age-> follows by a reproductive expansion of the species as a new ‘top predator’, while the individual gives birth to an offspring-> Informative age/diversification of the species -> extinction/death & survival of the son species.

This simple scheme applies to the analysis of the ‘frozen horizons’ of the big-bang and the particles created; to the evolution of species, which appear in the fossil record small in size (1st bilateral vernanimancula, 1st modern mammal (shrewd), 1st horse, 1st human with technological/speech skills (Homo floresiensis?), first ‘self-reproductive machine’ (chipped nano-bacteria?).

Recap. The simple, morphological plan of evolution that each fractal species of the Universe repeats is caused by the fact that there are only 3 topological forms in the bidimensional Universe, lineal energy, cyclical information and i=ts reproductive, body combination. So only 3 new types of species can be created, one with more energy, one with more information and one that reproduces both.

EXAMPLES OF THE WORLDCYCLES OF THE UNIVERSE

A key difference between a ‘physical’ understanding of motions in a simplex Universe of 4 ‘spatial’ dimensions (where time duration is merely used as a measure of motion in space, v=∂s/∂t) vs. a ‘complex’ understanding in IST Dimensions, which included ‘changes’ in the proportions of ‘Entropy’ and ‘information’ of the being (arrow of life, from an energetic youth to a 3rd, informative age), and changes in the ‘size scale’ and ‘speed of time’ of the inner structures and clocks of the system.

The graph represents the worldcycle of life and death in a human being in I=TS IST Dimensions, as a system born as a seminal seed of information, in the cellular scale, i-1, which travels through the scales of social complexity emerging as an individual ‘whole’ i-system in the organic scale, and finally as a citizen, cell of society, to a higher, ∆+1 scale, God, nation or civilization, which will then, once the life cycle is over and all becomes information explode back into death, releasing that information as Entropy into the lower, i-1 scale of cells, ∑i-1, which will feed another worldcycle.

When physicists study motion in space-time, they reduce it all to a translation through space, in a time duration, which can be ‘∂erived’, that is, it is continuous without any remarkable change of state, for the system in the whole motion.

When we widen that description to a ∆ST motion, we obtain however a ‘worldcycle’, as the world line becomes more complex, curved in more dimensions.

Yet the main difference in what it means a translation in 4 Dimensional ‘Physical space’ and ∆ST Dimensional ‘Complex space’, arouses when we understand that in Complexity, entities are made of Dimensions (Leibniz’s theory of relational times and spaces) while in physics, dimensions are a ‘background’ abstract to the being – a deformation of the way they were conceived as absolute space and time, with a ‘background paper’s artifact – the Cartesian frame of analytic geometry.

Thus to move in physics over a background artifact of dimensions is different than moving in complexity as you are made of dimensions, your self-dimensions as an ∆ST Dimensional being move with you.

This outdated model of absolute background dimensions is thus replaced by a fractal model of dimensions:

Each entity of the Universe is made of a relative amount of ‘vital space’ and last a quantity of ‘time’ as it grows from its seminal scale to its individual and social scales, where it evolves and interacts with other similar entities. We are thus ‘vital dimensions’, we are made of them, their motions, symmetries and transformations.

And so all what exists follows the generational-life cycle:

 

 Ω. THE WORLDCYCLE OF EXISTENCE. Œ POINTS IN Æ MOTIONS.

And so what we call a worldcycle of existence of any particle is a sequential combination of both type of motions along the entire life of an entity.

WE SHALL CALL the journey of a worldcycle, a trip of existence, which in its infinitesimal analysis will appear as a sum of actions of space-time, a sum of parts that become wholes, a sequential series of time ages, and a series of territorial gradient space-time properties and vital spaces in which a O-point struggles to accomplish its program of existence:

Maximize, conserve your space-time: Max. Spx I: Max. ∆a,e,i,o,u.

Thus we can consider that the ‘conservative’ integral of the sum of the actions of a system (which will be a Hamiltonian in mathematical physics), gives us the ‘whole will’ vision of all the motions performed by a zero-point, while the sequential analysis of each of its a,e,i,o,u actions will give us a detailed study of its world cycle step by step. Those detailed, action-oriented, and whole-conservative perception of the world cycle and its motions are complementary and required to fully grasp why (to survive) and how (through cyclical actions) a system acts.

The UNIVERSE CONSERVES TIME MOTIONS, AND ITS COMBINATIONS, of Acceleration, which expels energy, and causes entropy, of feeding on E, (expansive motion) on informative perception, O, (implosive, cyclical motion) and Iteration, reproduction, repetition of the information of a being, of creation of universals. The ±∆ cyclical actions of space-time, its frequencies, synchronicities, knots and connections, is what the topo-bioloic game of the 5 motions and its infinite knots of existence, is what reality is made of.

We are a knot of existence, a knot of cyclical ±∆exi actions of space-time. We exist by performing actions, with a survival purpose. We enjoy the game. We are a point on the centre of a topological sphere, which perceives it all and defines with its crystal mirror symmetries that become linguistic orders projected into another area of the being, the will of the actions of the Universe.

There are souls, there a re minds that stop existential flows into mappings of realities:

Θ. O-mind (still mapping in lesser dimensions of) x ∞ Universe (infinite sum of cyclical motions of other existences=Linguistic mapping.

Stop, perceive, inform, go move, absorb information, expel energy, feed on energy, reproduce information,c communicate with clones form part of bigger wholes, follow the mandates of existence of the bigger whole, order your smaller parts, absorb even smaller quanta of energy and information, functions of existence you see as dead space, processed by the A-logic of your mind.

Tƒ be or not to be symmetric, equal, hierarchical, how to take advantage of the game, how to maximise my existence, and yet, all finish objectively defeated, and the world cycle consumes the being. Why?

Because the infinitesimal, indivisible repetitive actions of ±∆E,O, I, U, A of each being cancel each other and slowly erase the being, warp, penetrate and dissolve its time cycle.

Time Existences. Entropic ±accelerating motions, implosive, informative vortices, moving up and down the 5th dimension and iterative waves of repetition through extensive presents, cloned isomorphic membranes of space-time developed in its ST symmetries around us.

The repetitive forms in space and the dual motions of its beings, future to past of entropy, past to future of information, reproduced constantly in present waves of times, in which past-energy and future-information combine. That’s all. And the result are the cyclical actions of space-time and the clonic waves of similar Œ, functions of space-time existence, which populate the infinite parts and wholes of the Universe.

The Theory of ‘Time existences’, or ‘T.œ’ is thus a theory of conservation not of the spatial egos, fixed mappings of an ever moving Universe, but of the motion itself and its 3 past, present and future dimensional=formal motions.

That is what is all about. The eternally immutable, perfect, ever variable all and nothing cancelling and paradoxical, ±iTS, and its conservation laws. We can see all those flows in still pictures of space, as the 3 2-manifold varieties, of hyperbolic waves/bodies that connect lineal, toroid fields/limbs of accelerated and decelerated and steady state translations, or the informative particles/heads that gauge information and guide the system. But at the end all past and future motions balance each other into a zero sum, and all presents exhaust themselves into extinction or repeat into a clone wave, making the present last.

So there is a constancy of existences… which we perceive in universal constants (ratios of the 2 arrows/intervals of cyclical vortices, masses and charges, and lineal motions/distances, which define a relative curvature of space/time, vital constants that are metabolic ratios between energy and information, around a fixed temperature, in living beings and so on).

We shall study in this post, which advances further T.Œ, beyond the study of its two elements: vital spaces, encircled by time motions and its fundamental 5 varieties of cyclical motions of time, what we call actions of space-time, the integration of those space-time cyclical actions into waves of existence, of life and death, which are combined travels through the scales of the 5th dimension from seminal i-1 seeds into emerging wholes, which perform time cycles into an ∆+1 higher scale, to die back and explode its information into i-1 and i-2 planes, ending the wave, which will then be repeated by an offspring of iterative clones, which will form another wave.

∞. The immortality of time.

There is simple Logic-mathematical proof on the immortality of time, and the consequence: An immortal Universe.

The probability of ‘It’ not to be immortal but of finite time, T=K, is quasi-null: K/∞ = 0%.

Since the reminder the Universe would be in non existence, non existence would have an infinite duration.

Thus a finite existence, divided by the total existence K/K+∞ =0, gives us the probability of existence of a Finite T Universe, and we, within it. By reductio ad absurdum if the probability of existence of a a finite universe but the probability of existence of an immortal Universe is 1. Since we exist, we must deduce, that the Universe exists for ever: T=∞, ∞/∞=1 probability.

In brief the Universe either existed never or existed always. Since now it exists, it must stretch for ever and duration must be infinite T=∞, and the probability of being, 1.

A finite time on the other hand mean a O% of the total duration, a T+∞≈100%

Thus the chance that at any moment we are in existence in a finite time Universe is null.

Therefore it conserves time, in its three |xO=Ø arrows and the symmetric 3 varieties of 2-manifold spaces.

Once this is clear we are obliged to state that the Universe conserves time. Since if it does not conserve it, in the infinite existence of no-motion; time would have long ago been exhausted. And so we should not exist now. Yet time motions keep going.

So Time is conserved, and since there are infinite fractal time spaces to be conserved, we must consider conservation laws and Universal constants that maintain its same value through the passage of time in terms of the Metric of the 5th dimension. Thus we can write a series of conservation laws, which will apply to any system of vital space-time, not only to physical systems.

 

The search for immortality: the middle point of the world cycle.

Thus the life-death cycle, has its maximal in the point of balance (Max. (Sp x Tƒ)-> S=T) or maturity between youth, Max. Sp x Min Tƒ, and, 3rd age (Min. Spx Max.Tƒ).

And our systems of perception acknowledge it, with 2 concepts:

– One biological, as top predators are those who have maximal body ‘—motions’ and informative intelligence, surviving longer

– And one aesthetical, as we perceive beauty in the balance, of ‘‘—motions’’ and ‘form’, the two primary ‘elements’ of reality.

Thus in a synoptic manner the ∆ST Universe can be reduced to a game of ‘forms in space’ and ‘motions in time’ with its balanced combinations.

Yet physicists only accept lineal ‘—motions’, as the arrow of future ignoring the relationship between time clocks and cyclical, rotational motions that carry the information of the Universe.

Thus, a key innovation made by complexity is to consider a wider vision of time dimensions also, recuperating for science the past, present and future division of classic philosophy, as dimensions of time:

– < Expansive, ‘past’ motion that erases dimensional ‘form’, information, creating space

‘—motions’ is expansive motion, the relative past dimension of beings, as it applies when a ‘form’ dissolves from its upper ∆+1 social scale down into its cellular parts in the moment of death, or in a big-bang explosion (biological and astrophysical beings).

– > Implosive ‘future’ accelerated motion that warps space into dimensional form creating information

Information is implosive, rotational motion. It is the inverse of ‘—motions’, (called for that reason also negantropy).

Yet in complexity, unlike in physics, which considers ‘‘—motions’’, expansive ‘—motions’, ‘a dying universe’ the future, we consider information, form, the arrow of life, the future. Since systems constantly increase in information, in form, warping space into time cycles with gravitation; or wrinkling through life, accumulating an excess of ‘memorial’ cycles.

Since ultimately the ‘longer stretch’ of existence for any system, is the arrow of life, while the arrow of death, takes a relative zero time to happen (Max. Spx Min. Time). And so the arrow of information dominates the arrow of ‘—motions’, which expands space but lasts one i-1 quantum of existence (the ‘faster’ life period of the lower cellular scale of the system).

= Present repetition: The reproduction, production, repetition, iteration, decoupling of ‘forms’ of the Universe in cloned forms in all scales of reality maintains the illusion of an ‘eternal’ self-repetitive, fractal present.

And so we define a dual ‘beat’ for all beings to explain the worldcycle of each of those entities made of ‘scalar space-time’:

Sp>Tƒ (Life-Information arrow) =Present Arrow = Tƒ<<Sp (death arrow).

Or in synoptic manner: Sp>=<Tƒ, which becomes the fundamental causal equation of the 3 time ‘dimensions’, T(e,ƒ,o).

As all systems, first ‘grow in information’ from the relative past ‘—motions’ of birth to its final 3rd age of excessive form, in the i-dimension; both in biological systems (aging arrow) and physics systems (change of state from gas to solid of most physical systems).

Yet those relative past and future arrows, are ‘broken’, fractal ‘time durations’ or rather ‘time frequencies’, with a limited number of beats, for each i-superorganism, whose ‘time dimensions’ will end with the ‘reversal’ of death – a relative travel to the past of a ‘living system’ of ‘—motions’ and information.

Since we are made of fractal time durations, in a Universe of infinite time clocks where absolute time is merely a ‘Kantian category’ of the mind, but not of the Universe – a fact that forbids certainly the type of paradoxes and ‘time travels’ proper of a less detailed analysis of the Universe with a single time arrow, as Simplex Physical 4D descriptions of the Universe make us believe.

A worldcycle of life and death is paradigmatic of all the processes of birth, evolution, reproduction, information and explosive death of all systems, either biological or physical (where the 3 ages are the 3 states of a molecular gas->liquid->solid->Big bang cycle). They define a fractal Universe of IST Dimensional beings ‘made of dimensions of space, time and cellular, organic, and social complexity’, where each ‘worldcycle’ is a Universe in itself, made to the image and likeness of the whole Universe, which also has a worldcycle from its big bang to big crunch, and might be just a ‘cell’ of a higher hyper universe.

We thus start to observe some fundamental symmetries and inversions of ‘complex dimensions’, which rule the existence of species ‘made of them’.

Thus T.Œ must study in great depth the contradictions of those world cycles, which are all for their zero points but mean nothing, in an infinite, eternally moving Universe. Time is conserved, but since time is motion, what is conserved is the eternal tao, the eternal symmetries and transformations of stop and go beats, cycles that become lines that become cycles across 3 dimensions of space of time of Universal Planes; NOT the spatial minds that stop time in infinitesimal mind-mappings of space:

             O-Mind x Infinite Universal motions = Fleeting Still mapping of those motions.

Since no mind excepts perhaps the consciousness of the whole Universe in a very slow time-quanta, that of absolute space-time as a pantheist God which encloses in each of its mind mappings the entire reality into a ‘Pure Thought’, is immortal. But that is pure metaphysical speculation. So let us start our journey through the travelling waves of space-time in the most minute of all motions, a mere translation of space, in two adjacent, discontinuous regions, as motion is also reproduction of form

Those 3 ‘points of maximal, minimal and stationary balance’, ARE the 3 points we find in all timespace ‘world cycles’, from physical motions (it is called then the Hamiltonian of the motion) to the 3 ages of life, the young age of energy, the age of balance and adult reproduction and the 3rd age of information…. to the point that we shall define:

 

II. WORLD CYCLES AS A SUM OF CYCLICAL SPACE-TIME ACTIONS. image004

In the graph, the time motions of all species are guided by the 4 main arrows of time: the motions of atoms, complementary entities with a center of gravitational information (quarks) and a surface of electromagnetic Entropy (electronic cycles); the motions of molecules, which vibrate as they evolve socially into complex cells.

Those cells can also be defined as a series of informative motions with center in the DNA/RNA systems and energetic motions, masterminded by lineal, energetic proteins that surround the cell.

The Law of organic evolution determines that those cellular knots of motions evolve into networks and organic chains that form complex vital organisms. Among those organisms, such as the bird eating the worm in the picture, the selection of the best forms causes the extinction of the simplest ones used as ‘Entropy’ of the top predator form. Thus survival justifies the growth of individual parts into waves, herds and organisms. Social evolution is also obvious in History, whose final goal is to create a Global Super-organism of equal human beings, who become cells of Mankind. But Mankind is just the ‘informative’ brain of a planetary body, called Gaia, which we should try to preserve as we preserve our reproductive body if we want to survive.

Multiple space-time arrows=cycles=dimensions.

All what you see is caused by a motion of an entity through space-time. This motion can be perceived as a dimensional form, if we consider the entire trajectory of the entity (a world-line in the jargon of metric spaces), like the lines of a car in the night, taken at slow motion. It can also be considered an action born of the need of the entity for Entropy, information or more complex needs, born of the combination of the previous 2; and then we shall call it an arrow of time, or tendency of future caused by the action of the being.

Or it can be seen as a repetitive cycle, in as much as species switch between the different arrows and needs, so cyclically they return to certain trajectories and åctions – feeding, informing, reproducing and evolving socially.

What we shall do in this work is use those 4 arrows to explain most phenomena, and then refine the analysis of the details of the Universe by differentiating some of those arrows in new dualities. For example, social evolution is different among energetic ‘species’, which form only waves with minimal communication and informative particles, which form networks. Finally in the Universe processes of social evolution are multiple and fractal so atoms become molecules that become cells that become organisms that become societies and so we have to consider those fractal scales of reality and define a fractal or transcendental arrow. This means we divide the social arrow in 3 different sub-arrows of time, for a total of 6.

On the other hand the arrow of reproduction can reproduce a simple action or ‘minimal cellular’ event that combines Entropy and information, Sp X Tƒ, which is used in physics; or it can reproduce a far more complex social organism till recreating the entity, Spe<=>Tiƒ, which is the arrow of reproduction proper and as a result of this, when multiple reproductions happen in time, it gives birth to a series of generations between the birth and extinction of a species, and so we can divide in 3 sub-arrows the arrow of reproduction, for a total of 8.

Finally, if we take the entire Universe or any of its worlds or ecosystems as a whole, it is obvious that we can consider this final teleological goal of creation that puts together all the parts of a set into a whole, the 9th and final arrow, which defines the absolute space-time, Spe X Tiƒ, of reality and exhausts our analysis. So the total arrows and dimensions of the whole Universe are 9 – the maximal arrows of time we shall use here. But in this introductory course we use basically the 4 biological arrows that suffice for a detailed analysis of reality: the arrow of Entropy feeding, informative perception, reproduction and social evolution.

Consider what you do as a human being with your lifetime, and try to put your events and åctions within those 4 categories: All family events relate to reproduction. All feeding events relate to Entropy. All social events relate to eusocial evolution.

Your work events relate to the accumulation of money, the ‘language of economical reproduction’ that allows you to acquire the energetic and informative goods your reproductive body and informative head require. When you drive you are in an event that converts Entropy into motion. When you read this book or watch TV or surf the Internet, you are accumulating ‘information’, albeit expressed in different languages, made with different ‘formal symbols’. At the end, you will not find any action that does not become explained by those 4 arrows. And since you are in fact, as a human being, the most complex ‘form’ of the Universe, it is easy to deduce that all other simpler species also perform events related to those 4 arrows.

For example, Physical matter & space can be described with those 4 arrows: We know that the simplest physical beings – particles – gauge information (so quantum theories are called gauge theories), absorb Entropy (called forces), reproduce into self-similar particles (so quarks and electrons produce self-similar quarks and electrons when you give them Entropy), and evolve socially into atoms, molecules and celestial bodies. So the two limits of simplicity (atoms) and complexity (human beings) we know, do follow the main Postulate of the Theory of Multiple Spaces-Times – that the Universe can be explained departing from the study of the properties of those 4 main arrows of time.

This self-evident truth however is hidden to science due to the religious traditions ‘subconsciously’ embedded in the work of the founding fathers of science, mostly pious physicists of the Jewish-Christian tradition, for whom there was a single, monotheist God. And so, when a Philosophy of science was devised by those ‘founding fathers’, it became natural to seek for a single arrow of time that matched the Christian beliefs of Kepler, Galileo, Descartes and Newton4. The choice of arrow was thereafter defined by the nature of Physics: since earlier physical studies were based in clock-measures of the motions in space of physical particles, expansive motion=Entropy= entropy has become the single arrow of modern physics.

Yet entropy-only models ignore the arrow of information, of morphological change that defines life. In that regard, there are in science two theories of time, which this work fusions and upgrades into the more complex knowledge about mathematical and logic languages and complex natural phenomena (fractals, chaos theory, black holes, cyclical time, information sciences, etc.) proper of the XXI C:

– Theory of Evolution, the Biological Theory of time developed by Darwin, based in causality and logic time, according to which Time evolves the in/formation, the form of species. Since the causality of Time is based in the extinction of the less perfect morphologies of the Universe, whose form is destroyed and used as Entropy for the future reproduction of the best forms

– And Relativity Theory, in which the analogy of Time-clocks is taken to its ultimate consequences, defining times as a ‘curved geometry of space’, self-similar to that of clocks.

This work unifies both Time theories into a single scientific theory of time=change, by expanding the Einsteinian concept of a curved geometry of time events, which are ‘cyclical in nature’, as the time cycles of the clock, to biological sciences; and the concept of the survival of the fittest ‘forms of time’, proper of biology to physical particles, where species with maximal momentum survive.

Thus the ultimately surprise of the new paradigm is that you live in a vital universe because the 4 arrows just described are the 4 properties biologists call the drives of life. Indeed, the Universe is made of infinite number vital, fractal, topological space-times that live, exist through those arrows.

Yet a Multiple Spaces-Times Theory goes beyond Evolution Theory, which studies the Time Arrows of Information and Reproduction and Physics, which studies the Time Arrow of Entropy, to include also the Time Arrow of Eusocial Evolution, especially relevant to understand Religion and History.

Recap. There is an homology between the concepts of a cycle of time, a dimension of space and an arrow of space-time or action, Sp X Tƒ, which becomes the unit of exi=stence of all beings.

In this introductory course we shall use basically the 4 biological arrows that suffice for a detailed analysis of reality: the arrow of Entropy feeding, informative perception, reproduction and social evolution.

Cyclical times, discontinuous spaces.

If we were to resume this model of multiple spaces and times in a couple of pages, we could say that it takes the alternative theory of cyclical, relational time, and multiple vital spaces, envisioned by Eastern Philosophers, the Greeks and Leibniz to its ultimate consequences, revealing the isomorphisms of time cycles, applying them to find the cyclical patterns all species of all sciences (since a science indeed must have predictive capacity by finding the cycles of the entities it studies and projecting them into the future), and establishing the rules of engagement between discontinuous ‘fractal spaces’ which co-exist in the same Universe but have different densities and forms of Entropy an information, and so need to establish communicative flows of those substances between them to maintain the harmony we observe in the whole reality.

Each of us is therefore a vital space that performs and lasts a series of time cycles. We are not in an abstract background of time and space (Cartesian-Newtonian paradigm) and the Universe has not only a single universal time-clock with a rhythm similar to the ones we humans use (the second of our mind thoughts, eye blinks and mechanisms).

Neither there are only a space-time continuum where all can be perceived, but at least to space-times of universal reach, the light-space we inhabit and the gravitational pace we do not see, and within the light space we live on, there are infinite ‘complementary atomic forms that web evolved particles of the mass membrane (quarks) and particles of the light membrane (electrons), in complex networks and organisms, which are themselves ‘broken pieces of space that perform specific time cycles’. Man is one of the most evolved forms of the Universe, but it is not different to the rest of them: we are a knot of biological time cycles that occupy a vital space.

And this simple scheme of things, which has always even known to philosophers but put aside by scientists because of the difficulty of measuring reality from infinite points of view, and infinite time rhythms must be ordered to become scientific. Let us tackle this most important question from the perspective of space, time and its combinations.

A verbal, logic definition of the 4 arrows will be as follows:

Entropy = Motion; In/form/ation=Form; Reproduction=Repetition; Social Evolution=Network.

The Entropy arrow is a change in the motion or translation of beings; the information arrow is a change in the morphology of beings; the arrow of reproduction is the repetition or iteration of an entity in other region of space-time and the arrow of social evolution is the process of evolution of individual, self-similar species (hence reproduced/repeated species), into complex herds, waves and organisms, thanks to their creation of social networks in which those entities share Entropy and information. So the entities of the Universe move, change form, repeat themselves and evolve into social networks.

A Universe made of lineal and cyclical motions is eternal, with ∞ parts in perpetual motion, which show 2 essential properties:

– Time arrows/events are cyclical and discontinuous. What happens in the past will happen in the future again, once the initial conditions are met. And so we can map out ‘frequencies’ of events that repeat themselves in a cyclical manner: Time cycles are patterns that happen ‘from time to time’, with a ‘frequency’, v, which is the essential mathematical parameter to study Time Arrows/cycles.

This brings also the geometry and concept of clock-times, which are instruments that mimic those 2 properties. In the same manner we eat from time to time in certain places (our favorite restaurant or dinner room), clocks come from time to time to the same place of space. Yet clocks only show the how and when, the geometry and frequency of those cycles. They do not explain why events repeat (we eat because we obey an arrow of time called ‘Entropy’; we make love because we obey an arrow of time called ‘reproduction’ so we need to copulate and so on.)

The discontinuity of time events causes the discontinuity of vital spaces. Since a cyclical trajectory encloses a ‘space within it’ and outside it. So time events become cyclical trajectories that isolate ‘vital spaces’, creating space-times of curved nature, which physicists describe with Theory of Relativity.

– Time arrows/events are causal. Time events have an order, A->B, which means event A must happen to trigger event B. We have to be hungry (lack Entropy) to need more food…

– Time arrows/events are self-similar. Time events happen in self-similar fashion in many different species. All life species for example feed on Entropy, and so do all particles that absorb energetic forces. And this is the reason why we consider ‘Entropy’ one of the fundamental Time Arrows of the Universe that its entire species absorb. Those general ‘arrows of change’ become in reality specific types of change of species. So science can use those arrows to understand the general meaning of each specific A->B event of each discipline.

– Time arrows/events are multiple, since each species has different types of change, and even though we generalize them with the concept of Time Arrows, those changes do happen individually. There are infinite time-clocks in the Universe, each one with a specific form of change or ‘trajectory/motion’, and/or different duration/frequency. Thus, absolute time is the sum of all the causal, deterministic paths of events that create the reality of each entity of the Universe.

All those repetitive cycles and changes put together is what we call time, but in many civilizations is called ‘Times’. This ‘relational concept of times’, clearly explained by Leibniz, differs though from the single clock-time concept of Newton10, which might be easier to use for calculus (reason why it is accepted in the praxis of science) but will not make us advance much in the philosophical understanding of times-changes.

The existence of those 4 arrows/cyclical åctions, which a certain entity of time/space performs, arises from a bio-logical analysis of the fundamental fact of existence: we are made of quanta of spatial Entropy and temporal information. This implies that the existence of all beings has a limit of duration in time or death and a limit of size in space or individual discontinuity.

So all beings need to absorb fractal Entropy for its reproductive body and information for its mind to continue their existence in time/space. Further on, beings reproduce in order to surpass their limits in time, repeating their form in another region of fractal space/time, overcoming in this way the temporal limit of their existence, the cycle of death. Finally, beings associate to other similar beings to surpass their limits of fractal, spatial size, growing in macro-organisms that are simultaneously a sum of individual cells and åctions put together into an Organic Whole that acts as a unique being.

Yet the being will never be eternal and at a certain point its time-space will collapse after performing a sum of those survival cycles. We call the sum of all the energetic, informative, reproductive and social cycles of existence of a being, its generational cycle.

So from electronic cycles that exchange Entropy and information, described with quantum numbers, to man who acts seeking those cycles, feeding, learning, loving and creating societies, the ‘will to create dimensions of existence’ is embedded in any cyclical Space Time field that tries to overcome its fractal limits, creating 3±∆ physiological dimensions.

The ‘existence’ of those cycles is in itself a tautology. Since a being that doesn’t perform those cycles becomes extinct and hence no longer ‘exist’. Thus all what ‘exists’ accomplishes those 3±∑∆ cycles/dimensions, including a light photon or a crystal, which repeats its form, associates in molecules and processes Entropy into information, creating an image within its internal, informative center or vibrates emitting Entropy. Since all exists to cycle and cycles to exist.

Recap. Time events are cyclical, happening ‘from time to time’, when an entity absorbs Entropy or information with its field/ body or particle/head. The Universe is a tapestry of fractal, vital spaces, imprinted by cycles of temporal information, which create infinite beings. Those beings reproduce, combining those arrows and then associate in larger social groups. They are the 4 arrows/cycles of time that the 3rd paradigm of metric spaces pegged together into a single space-time continuum.

The beats of the Universe: Sp<=>Tƒ

The simplest of those cycles of course is the clock: the needle comes always to the same point and closes a cycle. But the clock is a metric cycle of time, as the point is always in the same metric distance from the needle and the structure doesn’t move. In a topological space, a time cycle is not concerned with distances and continuity of the cycle but the entity just has to return to a self-similar topological form, which has one of the 3 functions mentioned before – energetic, informative and reproductive topologies/functions.

So a key law of the 4th paradigm is an old law of science:

Each form of topological space performs a time function/arrow

This law becomes the key to understand those cycles. For example, when a lion comes to a topology of Entropy called water, and drinks, he is completing a cycle of Entropy feeding, by intersecting with the plane of water and absorbing it, and that is a time cycle even if he doesn’t return to the same water well and doesn’t return with the same metric distance, as a clock does in a metric space. What the lion accomplishes is a time cycle in a topological space, in which what matters is no longer the form but the function of Entropy feeding.

Thus we establish a new concept of a space-time cycle, one in which function supersedes metric form, and consider that there is a common ‘arrow of time’ called Entropy feeding, which all Complementary entities of Entropy and information achieve. Suddenly we realize that all entities feed on Entropy because they need to move and they all have a reproductive body/field of Entropy, which must be replenished, or else it will be spent. And this overall function of all systems, feeding on Entropy becomes the first arrow/cycle of time of the Universe.

Yet all those complementary forms do have also an information network that requires perceiving the Universal tapestry. So in fact, even before the entity feeds it will have to perceive, gauge and calculate information.

And this becomes the second arrow of time, of all complementary beings. And again we realize that even physical particles gauge information, and certainly move with it field of forces. So do biological beings that process information with DNA nuclei and heads, and process Entropy with their cellular bodies. And so now we have 2 arrows of time – a concept that means tendencies of the future – Entropy and information, and two types of cycles to accomplish them.

But unlike the classic concept of science of a single continuous time arrow (the arrow of Entropy or entropy), because we have now two arrows, time must be discontinuous, as the entity must go from Entropy cycles to information cycles and this establish the universal, fundamental beat of reality: all entities of the Universe go through a process of motion (Entropy process) and stillness (perceptive informative process). Since we realize that to perceive and map information you have to ‘measure’ in stillness. Here it comes the meaning of all those metric spaces of classic science. They describe the arrow of information and measure; while all those analysis of motions and speed describe the arrow of Entropy.

Thus we define a universal beat of existence, Sp<=>Tƒ, motion, stop, motion, stop, Entropy, information. Like a movie in which the frame moves and stops and illuminates in stillness creating a form of information, all entities of the universe have stop and go rhythms, day motions and night sleep, and when they move they process Entropy and when they are still they process information.

In this manner the generator equation of spatial energies and temporal cycles of information appears, Sp<=>Tƒ.

Thus a new field of science of enormous richness is the algebra of time, which studies the previous equation and all its possible beats from where all events of reality will emerge. This equation is to systems sciences and complexity what the Unification equation of Physics is to physicists, a sub discipline of the wider view we bring here – since we shall be able to deduce all the equations and species of all the sciences of mankind from that simple first beat.

For example, all physical systems are complementary, made of a field of Entropy (Se) and a particle of information (Tf), which constantly switch between one and the other state: e<=>o.

All cells have a nucleus of informative DNA and a body that absorbs Entropy and reproduces, and so do all biological organisms with an informative head and a body that absorbs Entropy and reproduces, o<=>e. And the difference between both is that in physical systems Entropy=motion dominates and in biological systems, information dominates.

We could say and ‘God say move and stop, feed and perceive with your body/field and particle head’; and in this manner he set in motion the game of infinite forms of existence.

Let us then try to classify all those space-time cycles, breaking them ‘apart’ from the equalized time of the clock that metric spaces have used today to measure all of them.

Recap. All what exists is a complementary system of Entropy and information that switches between both states: Sp<=>Tƒ.

Dimensions/arrows/cycles of Existence in space-time.

The first astounding conclusion of a careful study of all structures, forms, cycles and events of Nature is that we can reduce all of them to a dualist->4-dimensional scale, according to which all what exists is created by Entropy and information, the simplex arrows of space-time. Those 2 arrows in a first layer of complexity combine in social events, and reproductive events, creating the 4 ‘drives’ of all biological beings, since biologists define life as entities that feed on Entropy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially.

Thus from 2 simplex, Entropy and information arrows come 2 complex, reproductive and social arrows, which give us the 4 ‘dimensions’ of space-time.

We represent them with a generator equation, ∑Sp<=>∑2O, where we add 2 symbols of social evolution, ∑ a sum of the cells of the ‘body’ and ∑2 a multiplicative network. Since informative systems form networks that relate all cells among them, multiplying its social power, and <=> the symbol of feedback cycles between Entropy and information systems that reproduce the entities of the Universe. The equation represents also any complementary system of Entropy and information in the Universe, and depending on the operandi we use to substitute <=> we can represent one or other system or event.

This simple scheme of 4 arrows, dimensions, cycles or whys of the Universe suffices to understand the nature of reality. And so in most models of multiple time-spaces we use them to explain the events and forms of the Universe.

Recap. There are 4 whys in the åctions of all beings, whose cycles create the space-time trajectories that we perceive as space-time: Entropy cycles, informative cycles and their combination, reproductive and social cycles.

Entropy->Form->Reproduction->Social Evolution

The main arrows of time are Entropy, information, reproduction and social evolution. We cannot unify further those ‘classes of events’ without losing ‘key information’ about them, as Physics or monist religions do, with their obsession with a single ‘God’ and a single ‘Clock-time’ to measure all types of times-change. Instead, we can study in detail those arrows, its properties, cyclical periods and the relationships between them. And the first logic question to make on this complex philosophy of science/time is: Can we use Logic Time – the existence of causality; of a successive order in the path of events that go from A to B to C, etc. – to classify those arrows, which include all other phenomena into themselves?

What was first the egg or the chicken is a key question of science. The answer is intuitive – the egg; the seed of information, the perceiver point of view, head or particle of information that gauges reality to decide its energetic motions with a purpose. The Universe, not only man, is intelligent, and so are all its parts. Each mathematical point of view, each knot of Time Arrows, from the simplest atom to the mind, decides first intelligently the ‘time arrow’ or purpose of its motion in its still, perceptive, informative state and then it moves its mass or body/limbs, where it is the Entropy to feed itself, or in more evolved beings, where to reproduce or join a social network.

Thus, there is a causal chain that produces the more complex Time Arrows, reproduction and social evolution, from the simplex ones, Entropy and information:

Information (subject) absorbs Entropy to move in order to Reproduce or Evolve Socially->OERS

This logic order is the most important causal chain of reality, responsible, for the cycle of life and death, the isomorphisms of evolution and the eternity of the Universe.

In all universal åctions, we must start with a perceiver, I, the subject of all åctions, of all sentences. This perceiver – the unmoved one of Aristotle, the Atman, the Soul, the Monad, the Non-Euclidean Point of View of Time Theory – is a knot of Time Arrows, or motions with a will, of wishes and memories. And the first thing it does, automatically, is to perceive flows of Entropy and create a mapping of the Universe, in its particle-head, then it will move with Entropy, space, extension, the ultimate substance of the vacuum in search for one of its arrows; it will untangle a knot of memories looking for a replication, T->Sp->ST.

The subject will spend its Entropy/motion, tracing geodesics, world lines, curved trajectories, all of them mappings in a complex plane of a mere circle. In this manner the subjects become ‘forms-in-action’, informations. And once we have an entity of Entropy and form, with momentum, with Entropy and time, with a cyclical motion, a purpose, once Schopenhauer’s Idea becomes Will 14 in search of the immortal repetition of its forms and motions we exist in an event of reproduction that will produce waves of self-similar forms…

It is reproduction, the purpose of existence? No, reproduction is only the beginning of the final arrow of the fractal Universe, which is to evolve individuals into societies that last longer in time, have bigger vital spaces, and hence survive better.

The 4 time arrows imply that the substrata of reality is Time-space, not space-time, since the 3 dimensions of time, past=lineal Entropy, present=wave /repetition, future=form /cycle are motions; and the existence of causal relationships and social isomorphisms that create complex systems of motions, introduce an entire new category of knowledge in the human mind: that of the isomorphisms of time-space, the morphological relationships between its transcendental forms and the relationships between the different fractal scales of reality.

Recap: The 2 simplest Time arrows of are the creation of Entropy and information. The simplest events of time seem to be energetic feeding. To create ‘form’ we need first ‘formless’ Entropy.

Yet prior to all motions and transformations of Entropy there must be a perceiver or point of view, the fundamental logic particle of the Universe, either a particle of information – a biological head or any other ‘linguistic processor’ of information, which defines a path of action – a motion in search of Entropy to reproduce itself. It is the game of Existence. On the other hand, to reproduce an entity of Entropy and information we need both arrows, Sp X Tƒ, which combine to give ‘birth’ to the infinite species of the Universe.

Once reproduction happens, the Universe shows a 4th organic arrow of time that evolves socially self-similar, reproduced individuals into waves, herds and organisms. The 4 main arrows of time together define a game of creation of Entropy and information entities, which reproduce and evolve socially, emerging once and again into more complex forms: lineal and cyclical strings evolve together into particles and forces, which evolve together into atoms made of quarks and electrons, which evolve together into molecules, cells, organisms, societies, planetary systems, galaxies and Universes. For that reason we can establish a causal arrow of Time between the 4 arrows, Sp->O->R->S.

The 4 cyclical, dimensional åctions of existence.

Any organism or species between conception in its inferior plane of seminal form, (∆-1) and its death back to the same plane of cellular existence, exists through those cycles in a social st-plane in which he performs them. Which in Cyclical Time terms means that it performs a fractal, a social sum (+Se x Po) of energetic (Sp), reproductive (<=>) and informative (O) cycles. The study of reality is the analysis of those space-time cycles that we can formalize, departing from the space-time field equation, ∑Se<=>∑2Tƒ, defining any cyclical action as a partial event of that cyclical equation:

– Sp<=O: Entropy, feeding cycles/dimensions transform information into Entropy or negative arrow of entropy and direction towards the relative fractal past. They dominate the young 1st age of an Exi field.

-Sp=>O: Informative cycles/dimensions form the positive arrow of entropy and future that transforms Entropy into information. All forms process spatial Entropy into temporal information, from atoms to black holes, which either acquire form or perceive reality. So all beings become ‘informed’. They dominate in the old, 3rd age of the Se x Tƒ field.

Informative and energetic events/forms are inverse arrows that co-exist together, shaping a dual cycle, which sometimes occurs simultaneously, as in a Darwinian event of hunting, when a predator energizes itself, killing the information of the victim. And sometimes ‘stretch in the 2 directions of time’, from past to future in the process of life and from future to past in the process of death. So we write: Victim’s Death: Entropy bang = Life: Informative feeding by a Top Predator

Thus, the existence of many beings can be explained as a dual fluctuation of a space-time field that first evolves, increasing its information, as the entity ‘lives’ and then devolves, decreasing its information as the entity ‘dies’, closing in this manner a ‘space-time cycle’, easily described with the space-time equation. Thus, we ‘travel to the past’ when we lose information or devolve our form, as when we die, or when we go to a ‘relative past culture’ that has less information. And vice versa, we travel towards the relative future when we evolve and increase our information.

– Sp<=>O: e<=>o: The reproductive cycle/dimension, a mixed, internal and external, dual direction that repeats the Entropy and information of a being in another place of space/time and requires, therefore, the co-existence of the other 2 cycles, and dominate the mature age of each field. The reproductive cycle sometimes is a social, dual cycle (sexual reproduction) and sometimes is an internal, individual cycle. Yet in all cases is the fundamental cycle of existence, which ensures a certain degree of ‘fractal immortality’.

Since those cycles exist to preserve the being through the repetition= reproduction of its logic form in other place of the Universe. Thus species inform themselves to accumulate Entropy in order to reproduce their form and cheat its fractal nature, surviving in time by creating reproductive events that happen in all kind of entities. Reproduction becomes the why and will of the fractal Universe: all existential beings perform informative and energetic cycles transforming those 2 substances into replicas of their own morphologies.

– ∑ or ∑2: The being performs many of its existential cycles as external social cycles, integrated in a herd, S of parallel body cells or an informative network, ∑2 displayed in two scales (cells and axons), that inform, energize and reproduce together, simultaneously as a group. Since social behavior allows the being to increase its form in space as part of the whole. And so it is also essential for spatial survival, since a bigger form displays a stronger ST action and survives better than a small one. A fact that we formalize with the fractal symbols, ∑ & ∑2 the algebraic parameter that defines all åctions as a sum of smaller fractal action-reaction cycles: ∑Ei<=>∑2Tƒ. We thus talk of a series of cycles of social evolution, which create hierarchical scales of growing spatial size and organic complexity (max.Sp X Tƒ) that gather atoms into molecules, molecules into cells, cells into organisms and organisms into societies or disorders waves and organisms into fractal cells and particles. It is proper of all ages, studied by each science with different jargons. So in Physics we talk of the wave-particle duality that gathers quanta in particles and explodes them in waves and in Biology of networks that order cells into physiological systems, etc.

– The sum of all those cycles gives origin to the life cycle, the cycle of the total existence of the being, from its birth to its death; which according to the ternary principle is divided in 3 ages defined by the sequential dominance of the previous cycles, as the existential species or organism will perform more energetic cycles in its first youth horizon, (max.∑St), more reproductive cycles in its maturity, (max ∑ST) and it will accumulate more information in its old age, prior to extinction (max. ∑2Tƒ).

In all fractal, cyclical åctions can be subdivided in 3 ages:

– Max. Sp: When we ‘look’ to absorb visual information or we ‘eat’ to absorb Entropy, in the first age, in the beginning of the cycle, we maintain the eyes or the mouth opened, with max. Entropy=extension.

S=T: Then we close and open the mouth or the eyes, blinking and chewing in an intermediate alternating movement that reproduces the cycle many times.

– Max. Tƒ: Finally, we swallow, closing the mouth to ‘reform’ the food in the stomach into our proper ‘in-form-ation’ or we think with the brain, and extract the Max.Informative perception of the image, in the third, implosive, informative age of the cycle. So:

Existential cycle=S Entropy cycles + reproductive cycles+ informative cycles

Thus, the existential cycle, between birth and extinction, is the fractal sum, ∑, of its energetic, informative and reproductive cycles, often performed in social groups (hunting herds, waves, couples), in which Entropy and information mutate into each other (∑Sp<=>∑2Tƒ).

Recap: The Universe and any of its systems composed of multiple parts form a deterministic, interconnected whole of infinite harmonies between all its cellular cycles, chained by their symbiotic nature, such as the fastest informative cycles gather in ternary and decametric scales, connected to the frequency of the energetic cycles, which are connected to the frequency of reproductive cycles, which are connected to the frequency of the social cycles: I->Sp->R->∑.

Since an informative cycle is required for the entity to orientate itself towards a field of Entropy, and both Entropy and information together in great quantities/cycles are required to create a reproductive cycle; and finally multiple, self-similar reproductive entities are needed to create a super-organism. The same hierarchical chain happens if we observe those entities in space, such as the pixel of information is minimal, making informative systems smaller than bodies and bites of Entropy. And each of them is smaller than the total organism composed of both, which is smaller than the eusocial system of which the organism is a single cell.

The 7 type of Time cycles: space-time Actions.

The minimal unit of the Universe is an infinitesimal action. As such there is always a quanta of action in the limiting region, we shall call with the generic term of ‘Lorentzian region’ (as a reference to the similar region of the U±3 human light/mass space-time).

This quanta exists between the minimal So=U-1 lower minimal quanta of existence and the whole Universal existence or Universal Plane, U∆.

In that regard we can write: A(U∆)=So≈U-1.

That is, the minimal cyclical action of space-time, is always the infinitesimal of a certain whole. We call this infinitesimal a ‘cell’ in space or ‘action’ in time, product of a cyclical time-clock and a vital space enclosed by it.

In Physics åctions are measured by angular momentums, whereas h, the sum of 6 can be considered the minimal cycles of space-time of the quanta world.

But åctions are more varied than the simplest translation in space-time described by physicists. So often mathematical tools such as the Lagrangian and the Hamiltonian, to calculate åctions in terms of minimal energy expenditure, will not work. We thus need to do a qualitative description of åctions, when we deal with more complex, more detailed, closer observed, U∆<|2| planes.

topological, spatial or temporal, moving terms. An action thus can be studied as a whole world, but in terms of relative Universal planes of space-time, is equivalent to the minimal quanta that makes sense in such a plane. This limiting region between the existence and non-existence this ‘lorentzian border’ between the two scales of the Universe is the region of the minimal åctions.

In the light space-time Universe is h- the quanta of action, but in a more generic term it is any Minimal exi=ST, element of the system. And it can be seen as form or motion in ‘space’ or in time. So there are more åctions that the unique, motion-action studied by physicists.

343-

Actions are naturally the products of space and time, which coming from an asymptotic, space-time hyperbolic geometry, are inverse functions, that remain constant within two ‘limits of infinitesimal existence:

S/T dynamic Cycles that move between the two poles of 0 x ∞, of the inverse functions, Sp<ST>Tƒ, never cease to exist, as motion is eternal and so we rewrite the principles of motion and conservation. As cyclical åctions never end but:

‘Iterative TimeSpace cyclical åctions, reproduce, transform and dissolve into different forms of energy and information ad infinitum’.

This new principle of active conservation of energy and information of lineal and cyclical momentum of motion and form, substitutes the principle of conservation of energy. And defines the smallest, relative infinitesimal constant quanta of the Universe as an action of energy and time: S x Tƒ =ST(a.e,i,u)

A cyclical action of space-time will be then the minimal unit of the Universe.

In the graph we can see the simplest functional for an action in any Ui of the Universe, where the t(y) and S(x) functions will remain constant between two relative limits the infinitesimal 1 and the total x.

If we represent the same graph as a hyperbolic wave, introducing the inverse function of -∆ values, we obtain the 3 space-time ages of the hyperbolic function of existence, around a relative stable, S=T point (value 1 in the previous graph, where S x T is maximised):

182

 The previous graph shapes any space-time cycle as a sum of infinitesimal åctions of 3 ‘species’, repetition (equal tangent), decrease (negative tangent) or increase (positive tangent) Those stationary points of maximal minimal and equal value define a hamiltonian complete worldcyce for an action, between its birth and extinction as a hyperbolic function of existence, Sp = K/Tƒ. 

The symmetries and rotations of that equation across the dualities and ternary space and time sequential orders create a ‘Group’ whose elements are the ‘Space-time’ Events we observe in the Universe:

∑ Sp x Tƒ = K (Sp->∞: Tƒ->o)

We call each of those Sp x Tƒ events performed by a number of quanta of Sp and bits of Tƒ, which are in its maximal probability, Sp=Tƒ : Se2=K, an action of the function of ‘existence’, Sp x Tƒ  K, an existential action. How many type of Sp x Tƒ existential åctions, exi=ST, combinations of energy and information that create a stable space-time membrane do happen? Infinite of course, but surprisingly enough they can all be classified in 5 åctions, the five vowels of the convoluted grammar and sequential sentences of the Universe.

 

Tug-of-war between the selfish and selfless arrows.

Now we come to a philosophical question that might seem trivial when considering the automated, topological paths of existence performed by the åctions of the simplest physical beings, but has an enormous importance when addressing the will and åctions of human beings – the ‘Maslow’ pyramid of hierarchies between the 4 wills of existence.

Maslow studied that pyramid between the needs of man as a biological being, yet since the 4 arrows coincide with the 4 drives of living beings it is easy to notice how those 4 arrows and hierarchy are common to all other species.

In detail study we can observe that hierarchy to be equal to the main chain of causality between the 4 arrows: we need first to perceive to locate ‘—motions’ to feed ourselves, and only when we have enough ‘—motions’ we can reproduce, being the arrow of social evolution, the least desired, because it also conflicts with the first arrow of perception from the self-centered perspective of our ‘Galilean Paradox’. And so the 4th arrow of ‘belonging’ to a complex, social organism is often imposed from outside, and yet it happens all the time as complex social organisms are stronger than individual cells and hence survive.

Thus we can consider that the strongest will of the pyramid is our self-centered perception of the Universe that makes us feel superior to all other beings – the center of reality, since ‘Every point of view measures reality from its local perspective, confusing the entire Universe with its informative, still mapping or ‘mind’ that makes him feel the center of the world, and ignore all other minds, languages and perspectives he doesn’t observe’.

We, as all entities of reality are indeed, self-centered, arrogant Galilean Paradoxes that think to be infinite when we are just an infinitesimal fractal point absorbing a very reduced quantity of the total in/form/ations of reality with a specific ‘rod of measure’ of space and time, which constructs that mapping but will differ from other rods of measure and ‘time speeds’ of processing information of all other species of reality. So humans measure/perceive light and use the rod of absolute light speed to measure space and the frequency of a second – the blink of an eye, the heart beat and the speed of human thought – to measure time.

Yet there might be other beings who measure space with gravitational rods we do not perceive, with atomic or molecular rods as we do with the sense of taste and smell, etc.

Even the use of an absolute light speed could be changed by a rod that would make the ‘frequency of information’ of light absolute and then change the speed of the light waves according to the amplitude of those waves and have an absolutely different mapping of reality, which will certainly make sense, bring new perspectives a seem the absolute universe to those who ‘measure’ reality in that manner.

All those reasons imply that a topological model of reality is absolutely relative: from an existential point of view, regardless of the importance humans ascribe to their ‘intelligence’=mind perception, to their point of view, and to their ego and Galilean Paradox that make us think that our nose is bigger than the Andromeda Galaxy, we are nothing on the objective sum of all things, and we have no privilege neither we are treated with special difference by the game. And so because, each and all points of view are ‘meaningless’ for the entire game, only those points of view that submit the Galilean, self-centered paradox to the 4th will of eusocial love, and sharing of ‘—motions’ and information with other members of the same species to create a bigger superorganism do survive on the long term.

It is the basic tension human beings experience in real life, between our selfish ego-driven desires and biological, individual will and the need to give part of those desires for the common good of our societies and ultimately of the human kind. Indeed, the most successful nation on Earth, China, is based on the submission of the individual will to the collective superorganism.

‘Unfortunately in the case of the human-kind, the natural, final arrow of eusocial evolution that should have converted the entire species into a global superorganism able to survive in balance with our ‘—motions’ body – Gaia –has failed, and we have not evolved from the social level of tribal history, divided in nations, created by hordes of the most selfish, self-centered, arrogant type of humans, the warrior who imposes his will because otherwise he can kill and eliminate from existence those who oppose them.

Indeed, regardless of the paraphernalia of ‘memes’, bits of cultural information that praise the job of the military, it is self-evident that the biggest risk of extinction of mankind is war and the evolution of weapons of mass-destruction, driven by the failure of egocentric tribes to evolve into a global humanity. And the Universe always punishes those failures with extinction.

Thus we can consider that the simplex arrows of time, informative perception and ‘—motions’ feeding, in which we also ignore the ‘existence’ of the victim consumed as ‘—motions’, after eliminating their tasteless ‘head of information’ are the selfish wills of existence. And the two complex arrows of reproduction, which implies to give for free ‘—motions’ and information to our offspring and social evolution, which implies to give up our simplex wills for the common good of the society are the selfless arrows. And there is a tension between both kinds of arrows in all systems of existence.

Recap. The fundamental will of all points of view is the Galilean, self-centered paradox or will of subjective perception. Yet the Universe favors species, whose individuals are selfless and offer their ‘—motions’ and information to reproduce a self-similar replica of themselves or to build complex super-organisms of which they are only a cell.

EXI:ST. THE PROGRAM OF THE UNIVERSE.

Bell BEST2

In the graph Exi=ST ±4 is the function of existence of systems made of vital space and temporal sciences. As such each of the St±4 Universal Planes is studied by a ‘science’ but all share the same law.

We call Stience, the study of a given Plane of Universals, and its specific |x Oi subspecies. As such there are the following great fields of science:

U∆±∞: It is the science of fractal space-times, explained in the first and 3rd lines of this web, as it considers the general, isomorphic laws which are common to the ∞ Planes of existence of the Universe.

U∆±3: it is the first Universal Plane of which humans can reach full knowledge, as it is the light space-time from where we obtain our ultimate energy and information.

U∆±2: it is the closer world from we obtain the direct energy and co-exist with other human beings, thus the nested superorganism/dual Plane of the Universe, which encases our own System and U∆±1 World:

U∆±1: the cellular, organic and social scales of the Human kind. Hence.

U+0: The I-centered human, individual scale.

All those scales are thus defined by the existence of similar Oi systems, which follow the same isomorphic laws of all Oi entities.

The isomorphisms of all those Oi, Non-Euclidean Non-Aristotelian points, thus can be interpreted as the proof of a pantheist Universe, the capacity of stiences to define any system and study it in depth, and the existence of an enormous order, a program in the Universe, derived of those isomorphic scales and the properties and actions of Oi points of existence.

As all points do perceive as O-bservers, a world, and move in that Absolute Space time world, in search of energy to reproduce its information and evolve socially into larger social scales till emerging in another Higher Universal plane.

This action-oriented function of existence of all beings, O-bserver->A-cceleration->E-nergy feedingàI-teration->Universals evolution, is the essence of the sequential order in time of the Universe.

We have expressed it as a topological symmetry of the 3 varieties of 2-manifolds: spheres, where a central observer controls the external membrane, feeding on energy and information; limbs and fields of planar, toroid motions that open and close in steps feeding on the moving energy of the remotest Universal planes; the social interaction, reproduction and evolution of systems, due to the hyperbolic, parallel, intermediate social body/waves of the systems.

We have studied those actions of space-time in its frequency as they design a birth to death, through 3 ages of maximal energy to maximal information, worldcycle, by the clear pattern of their frequency. We have expressed a Lagrangian of those actions which gives a zeros um integrated along the worldcycle of existence of the being.

But we can treat in a more loose way the whole process, as indeed a ‘function of existence’, which we call life, and we all subconsciously follow.

Indeed to be so conscious of the game of existence as we are fundamentally kills the fun and intensity of it

Stiences of existences do have therefore a higher philosophy of science expressed in this web, based in the nature of scalar space-time, its isomorphisms and inverse properties.

In that regard, the program of the Universe and its fundamental concepts that generate all realities can be resumed in some simple points:

  • From 1 comes 2: The Universe of space-time is the ultimate simplification of a world made of multiple actions of spatial Entropy and temporal information, performed by an infinite tapestry of complementary systems composed of both ‘formal motions’.
  • From 2 comes 4: There are 4 actions of Entropy and time, each one with an internal and external, negative or positive direction: The simplex actions of Entropy (external motion and internal feeding). The simplex actions of time (external cyclical motion, and internal perception). And their 2 complex combinations: SxT, or external ‘actions’ and internal reproductions’ and ∑SxT, the fractal, social repetition of those actions, which creates external herds that feed on Entropy along an external network or super-organisms structured with inner networks that deliver Entropy and information to all its cells.
  • All systems of the Universe are defined as ‘knots’ of those 4 type of actions, which are cyclical and discontinuous, as each being switches between them, trying to survive by feeding (E), perceiving (I), reproducing (SxT) and evolving socially ∑SxT. We define the central point of those knots as a P.O.V. or fractal Non-Euclidean point, the ‘aperceptive’ engine that orders the Universe. And there are infinite of them.
  • The outcome of this structure is a fractal Universe, in which knots of cyclical actions become herds and super organisms, in which the ‘informative network’ emerges again as a knot that controls the actions of the herd, packing it tightly as a new ‘cell-point’ of a new ‘fractal’ scale of the Universe.

We must understand the structure of those worlds.

The Universe has man as its center, perceived sandwiches around itself inward and outward, of larger wholes made of smaller beings with a higher, ∑-parameter of quanta of relative entropy and relative information.

Once a zero point is born in that environment it will start to en-act in iterative cycles its energy, information, outward and inward impulses and establish social and Darwinian events with other points. This birth of a point thus implies a series of events points do by merely existing as systems of 3 varieties of bidimensional topological membranes with motions

It is the program of the Universe, which we all do:

Act,

Repeat your actions of exi=stence.

Sp x Tƒ = ST±4

 A Universe of cyclical space-time actions.

The Fundamental ‘derived’ unit of the Universe, performed by any ‘space-time being’, with a space-time momentum is an action of existence: ∂a,e,I,o,u.

We use to define them, as usual in ∆ST, several acronyms, to encompass all its varieties: R, for reproduction, A, for action or Ra, for ‘reprod-actions’, and differentiate 5 fundamental actions with 5 vowels for memory reasons associated to 5 names: ∂a,e,I,o,u (acceleration, energy, information, offspring, universals). Beings perform them through a worldcycle, and so we can talk of a ‘program of existence’, sum of all those actions.

Each of those actions traces a space-time cycle of a being, and so we can write the generator equation of relational internal/external space-time, Sp x Tƒ=ST in terms of actions as: Sp x Tƒ = ∑Ra = ∑∂a,e,I,o,u= ∫∂a,e,I,o,u.

This equation can be quantitatively studied, specially in physical systems, where œ=Sp x Tƒ, the function of existence is similar to the concept of momentum, hence each action will be a derivative of momentum or ‘force’ and its integration along the existence of the physical system, its total energy, which will go through different ‘states’ and changes from birth to extinction, forming the worldcycle of the physical system.

Yet in more complex biological and sociological systems, it is far more telling a qualitative description of those actions, through its whys. So we talk of drives of existence, Maslow pyramids, even mystical concepts such as Chakras, physiological systems that organisms use to perform actions, and many other different elements according to the science we study. The concept of space-time actions becomes then the unifying principle of an enormous number of different jargons and equations of different sciences, unified by the simple fact that all the events of the Universe can be reduced to those 5 space-time actions.

 Thus we could give another definition of the whole saying that:
The Universe reproduces actions: Sp x Tƒ=∑Ra, actions of existence which combine ‘—motions’ and information, into present waves bodies of energy and information.

The minimal unit of the Universe is an action of space-time, a momentum of existence, and once we localize one we can study it at many levels.

Actions though can be considered cyclical, mostly produced by an ∆+1 entity as expression of its existential exchanges of energy and information with the surrounding Universe.

A function of existence, Sp x Tƒ = RU±4, maintains a rhythm of repetition of its ‘actions’, which create waves, radiations from a focus.  The webbing of those actions of existence form a world cycle, and the world cycle carries the 3±1 ages of space-time topologies. And so there is a chain order of a higher degree of detail, when we consider the different type of Ra, Reprod-actions; actions of existence, the being performs in its polar game between body and mind:

Actions of Existence, ∆AU±4 , OU±3, ∆EU±2; ∆i, ∆UU±1.

A certain being will have certain internal constants that relate its Sp and Tƒ, body-head, wave-particle dual systems through similar dimensions. Most often, ∑Sei-1 ≈ ∑Toi, that is the number of cells of body and head, wave and particle is similar. In other cases the product in time of Tƒ cycles and Sp population of those cycles in simultaneous space is the same: ∑i-1=∑i.

 We shall study in this key post, the meaning of parameters, variables, magnitudes, constants, conservation principles and laws of science in terms of ∆ST metric.

That is, from the 4 fundamental elements of the Generator Equation: U= ∑ W: Sp x Tƒ = Ra, the ‘world’, of space-time, which maintains a constant, balanced combination of its ‘—motions’ and cyclical motions, by means of its ‘reprod-active’ action, ‘Ra’, is the theme of this post and its sub-post.

What kind of ‘balances’, combinations and iterations, a world-system performs through its world cycle of existence, and how can we mathematically express the laws of balance between ‘—motions’ and form that create and freeze the varieties of beings we perceive in the Universe? What is the relationship between those Sp x Tƒ =Ra systems and its larger Space-time Plane, from where they are a relative fractal part, made to its image and likeness? Are both in a relationship of proportionality? What kind of laws rule the diversification of Sp x Tƒ = Ra systems? And so on…

 

 

 

 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: