I. RELATIONAL SPACE-TIME THEORY
II. THE FRACTAL GENERATOR
III. HISTORY OF SPACE-TIME-THEORY.
IV. ∆@ST FORMALISM: FUNCTION OF EXIST¡ENCE:
Disomorphisms and Pentalogic
I. RELATIONAL SPACE-TIME THEORY
We are all systems made of ‘fractal space’ (a part of the whole space of reality) and cyclical time (a process of changes and motions from birth into extinction).
This fundamental truth however was lost when to reach higher accurate measure of distances and time periods mathematical physics started to use a single time clock to measure all the lifetimes of beings (the mechanical clock) and a single space continuum to unify all measures of distances.
What we lost then was the capacity to understand the multiple elements of the Universe, as we had now a single human point of view on scale of size in space and time duration (the meter, the second).
Soon this artificial ‘cartesian graph’ of space and time, as it did not fit the ‘real form of time clocks’ (cyclical motions) and the multiple scales of space-size occupied by ∞ beings, became also an artificial ‘background spacetime’ and so it lost its nature as the substance of reality -the yin and yang, the energy and information, the space and time duality. So today we have a deep knowledge of details of beings which we can manipulate scientifically but are completely lost in what regards the fundamental principles and laws of nature.
Those principles are relational space and time, and as a consequence MOST PROPERTIES of beings, including its topological structure as systems, its time ages, and its world cycles can be deduced of the ultimate properties of space and time and its ‘energetic combinations’.
So when we study a being we shall use a method we have called the Ðisomorphic method, which consists on studying the entity as a world cycle born of a seed or mind-singularity that will evolve, reproduce and create a superoerganism that will live its lifetime cycles and ages in an orderly fashion, because that is what time does with vital space – puts it through a process of life and death; and so as we are all vital spaces, we all live a world cycle.
And so we say that ‘the properties of beings are Ðisomorphic=similar, based in the nature of its Dimensions of space-time’. Beings are thus ‘Ðisomorphic’ (Ð being ð in caps, the symbol we use for a time cycle and a Ð for Dimensions), because they are made of space and time. And so we study the super organism and its world cycle through 11 properties/elements/events which then in the fourth line we shall study for each ‘detail=species’ of reality.
A FIRST VIEW OF SPACE=FORM AND TIME=MOTION
Definition of a Universe.
Let us define the Universe as a fractal super organism made of…
- A(nti)symmetries between its 4 Dual components that can either evolve in Balance≈become symmetric or annihilate=become Perpendicular/antisymmetric:
- S:space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
- ∆: Planes distributed in ∆±i relative fractal scales that come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
- ð: a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
- @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being. Because the scientific method requires OBJECTIVE measure of the existence of a mind, which is NOT perceivable directly, we infer its existence by the fact a system performs the 5 external actions, which can be measure objectively, in the same manner we infer the existence of gravitational in-form-ative forces by its external actions upon massive objects. Hence eliminating the previous limit for a thorough understanding of the sentient, informative Universe. And further classify organic in simplex minds – all, which must gauge information, move and feed to survive, and complex systems, those who can perform a palingenetic reproductive, social evolution, ∆-1: ∑∆-1≈∆º.
The study of those 4±¡ elements of all realities, its actions and ternary operandi, which result in a social evolution together of the 2 + elements (the balanced body-wave and informative @particle-mind, and the entropic destruction or ab=use of the – simpler, lineal limb-potential-prey, which structures the dynamic ‘Generator Equation’ of all Space-time Systems of the Universe, written in its simplest form as a singularity-mind equation, O x ∞ = K or in dynamic way, S@<≈>∆ð, is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.
And this view is called in science the ‘relational space-time theory’ of the Universe, which is what i finally after millennia of being explained in philosophical terms, formalised with logic and mathematics, and then used to explain an enormous amount of whys in all the sciences of the Universe.
Reality is the product of the two ultimate substances that make up everything, vital, space quanta, and cyclical moving time clocks, of information, which combine into energetic beings with its repetitive patterns we call laws of science.
And it does NOT matter how much evidence physicists deny about the arrow of information and mass that balances the arrow of entropy and makes the Universe immortal, how much they deny the 96% of attractive dark matter, the Universe did NOT appear in a huge big-bang.
And it does not matter how many humans believe in those 2 theories (abrahamic creation, big bang creation), all in fact either in one (western religious people) or the other (physicists’ fans), if they are rationally wrong they are wrong. But to prove them wrong we must debunk their theories of time-space, aka big-bang and black hole evaporation theories – and as we shall see explain properly in terms of time events the weak force, which is ultimately the force that transforms quarks intimately related to time cycles.
Thus it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational space-time models and apply them to all sciences, since to explain epistemologically reality we do NEED to ad organic and sentient properties ot the fractal Universe.
Infinitesimal mind-mirrors ordering local worlds
This is a self-evident.
Since while all systems gauge information, their capacity to order reality is just a mirror process by which languages mirror in ‘still, smaller linguistic images’ the world they perceive and then reflect this mind-order in their territorial ‘energy-body’:
Infinitesimal mind-language x ∞ Universe = constant self-centered world.
As Aristotle realized ‘we are all gods, the unmoved final cause of the motion of the energy around us’. So languages DO order locally preserving in ‘smaller’ scales the larger structure of the universe, converted in this manner in a Game of Fractal Mirrors.
In that sense, the fractal Universe we perceive as ‘it is’ cannot be explained rationally without adding to the acknowledged temporal and spatial properties we ‘expand’ with the concept of space-time ‘dimotions’, organic properties born of the co-existence of 3 scales of smaller parts that form networks, which become larger wholes… So for example, your nervous system perceives reality as it ‘integrates’ the sensations of all its cells.
But if we want also to understand how those infinite scales of size are created we need to postulate the existence of linguistic mind mirrors that ‘shrink’ reality into its infinitesimal still mapping; either as mental forms – since you indeed do NOT see the Universe but the infinitesimal electronic image created in your mind with light space-time; or as ‘seeds of information’, which we can consider a ‘static, frozen informative mind’ that will replicate a larger whole, replica of its inner information.
Minds are linguistic mirrors that shrink reality in space. While seeds are mirrors of superorganisms ‘compressed’ in its evolutionary duration of time (palingenetic seed), which implies a continuity of information through eons of discontinuous time generations. So minds & seeds ‘create’ the diminishing, ∞, spacetime scales of reality becoming the inverse arrow of causality to that recognized today by ‘Constructivism’, the theory of reality according to which causality comes only from the smallish physical world to the larger one. It is only when we ad this other causality when we can balance all stiences as absolutely relative and the two directions of the fifth dimension, upwards towards parental wholes and downwards towards smaller parts..
‘Time-space’ Theory. Expanding the dimotions of time-space to 5.
Time theory IS without any significant progress since Einstein, in a theme that seems very difficult for humans as you cannot by definition shoot still pictures of time=change as we do with space=form…
Why? Simply because the study of time space locomotions – what physicists study – is exhausted but THERE ARE 4 MORE TIME-CHANGES WHICH physicists hardly explored, notably those due to change in the in-form-ation of beings, which are a huge field of knowledge we shall explore in this blog.
Time is change, motion. All kinds of them. We have classified them all in 5 types, which sequentially as they dominate the life of beings are:
Generation of information->Young locomotion->Reproductive maturity -> Informative old age -> Entropic destruction. As all of them are changes of form in space, they are properly time space dimension motions or ‘DIMOTIONS’.
Timespace theory is then the study of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe.
But as humans use the term, or rather measure it, time is a cyclical closed clock-like motion. A problem of epistemology becomes then to properly adjust all the different ambitious jargons of mankind to a strict analysis of those 5 Dimotions.
Let us then make for starters a brief resume of the history of those huminds who searched for the ultimate simplest principles of reality, space and time.
Time theory’s next big advance IS not the evaporation of black holes but the models of relational space-time I completed and when I am gone ‘post-mortem’, will become the staple food of serious XXI century physical, biological and sociological research, as they explain the whys of science, which are the repetitive patterns=cycles of time of all its particular clocks, or else without cyclical patterns of time there would not be science, which consists exactly in the repetition of those clocks we can foresee.
If time cycles did not exist, and the single lineal clock of physicists were the only time, there is NO reason for repetition of events which is What LAWS OF SCIENCE TELL Us.
We shall thus in this post consider the evolution of science that passes as always every century through the evolution of our understanding of its first substances time and space (from XVI-XVII: Descartes->Galileo, to XVIII: Leibniz vs. Newton, to XIX: Darwin vs. religion, to XX-XXI: Einstein->Sancho), which has two fundamental views:
The physicists’ view of a single abstract timespace, with a single clock for the entire universe, the mechanical clock, that measures a single arrow of future time, the arrow of entropy, disorder expansion in space and death, which starts and ends in a constant big-bang explosion that erases the information of life and the Universe. Time is then ‘what the clock measures’ (Einstein) and obviously it is spoken in the digital language of clocks.
This view appeared only with the invention of mechanical clocks, the development of the Cartesian graph that uncoiled the cyclical form of a clock into a line, latter extended mathematically to infinity, and the discovery in the analysis of a local phenomena of entropy – the disordered heat of steam machines…
And it requires two ‘dogmas’ that ‘reduce’ sciences to this view and are called by philosophers of science, ‘reductionism‘ (only mathematical measures of time taken with the human-mechanical standard of a single clock, with a second unit that is our human heart-step-eye-thought rhythm matter, all other forms of measure of time=change are irrelevant; and all other time clocks must be ‘reduced’ to the human time clocks which is also the clock of the Universe); and naive realism (only what we can see and measure with our visual intruments matter).
IT WAS only on those basis that the big-bang theory of the Universe could be born, by disregarding absolutely every other form of time=change, every other arrow of time=change notably the energetic and informative arrows of the vortices of galaxies that ‘compress vacuum space into matter’ (‘time bends space into masses’ Einstein); and finally by disregarding 96% of the Universe of dark energy and dark matter (remember those are NOT arrows/substances of time-space for ‘entropy’ only physicists.
Hence the present mess about big-bang theory where the proofs that deny it, the things that are not explained by it, are overwhelming. Yet BECAUSE physicists will defend its dogmas with a very non-scientific sanguine, bully behaviour full of systemic insults against the ‘intelligence of other sciences’, the ‘knowledge of philosophers of science’, the self-importance of their discoveries, on my view copycatted of the bullying of its ’employees’, the military of the weapon industry where till the explosion of the electronic consumer industry 70% of them worked; there is no way to argue with them reasonably on timespace theory.
So plainly speaking NEVER from ‘here to eternity’ there will be a physicist who truly advances further time theory.
As what he studies is only a type of time change, translation in space, defined by an equation which uses time-change only to measure those changes in space motion, v=∂s/∂t, ∂t=v/∂s, where each ‘instant of time’, ∂t is defined as the measure of change in speed or position in space.
This time-change measure has been exhausted ad limit by physicists, conceded. There is nothing more thoroughly researched with the liberal help of the military-industrial complex, since Galileo defined time in those terms to measure shots of cannonballs for the arsenal of Venice, than motion in space.
Einstein took it to the limit by defining precisely that change in very fine ‘pictures’ of present, simultaneous space-time, adding a correcting factor to Galileo’s relativity, c²t², to account for the deformations happening at very fast motions; but NOTHING of the other type of changes and perceptions of time notably biological, informative time changes were added to the ‘soup’.
So physicists know all about time-change in space but they cannot make a philosophy of time, because they have ‘reduced’ time to that partial element of change, they have eliminated all languages which are NOT digital to measure time change, notably the logic of the 3 timespace arrows past, present and future, better explained with verbal logic.
Only a philosopher of science considers all the changes together and ads the logic of verbal thought and its 3 past-present-future verbs to explain time.
As mathematics IS better as a language to mirror space, geometry and points, though it can mirror time through sequential numbers, the loss is specially clear in the understanding of causality and time logic, which physicists finally abandoned for the false concept of ‘probability’, which has basically eliminated the key element to understand sequential events in time, causality, whose logic is NOT Simple aristotelian causality, as there are 3 arrows of time that mix together to create events.
So the logic of time is ternary, similar to the taoist or hegelian concept of a yin-thesis, yang-antithesis and yin yang synthesis, as opposites attract to form complementary beings:
Past-entropy x future-information = present-energy cycles.
It WILL be thus a polymath of all sciences where time events happen, explaining all those clocks together – from evolutionary biology to genetic clocks to historic cycles and economic evolution of machines – clocks of time the physicist does not even consider time clocks, because only the mechanical clock matter.
So Kepler’s>physicists reductionist view of a single clock, a single space and a single language of time must be confronted with the view of the organic Universe proper of philosophers of science and eastern cultures, which affirm that the ‘languages of god are infinite’ and the way we perceive time multiple.
This view of time indeed is flawed by dogma, reductionism and naive realism that eliminates all other clocks, all other time cycles, all other languages of perception of time-space, including the verbal logic of the three arrows of time, past, present and future.
So we shall return and explain the much wider, much extended through cultures (till the clock of physics became collective dogma) view of time as the processes of change, produced by the combinations of 3 arrows.
It is the philosopher of science’s view, which sees reality as an eternal balance between the arrows of entropy and death and the arrows of information and life that combine in the conserved momentum and energy worldcycles of the Universe.
‘Yin-visnhu-in/form/ation=dimensional form’ which combines with ‘yang-shiva-entropy=motion’ to create the ∞ ‘qi’=’brahma’=energetic beings with momentum ‘acting’ on the universe.
We have on purpose explain along the fundamental equation of the three ages of time:
Spe: Local past-entropy-motion x Tiƒ: local future information = ST: E: present conserved, repetitive cycles of space-time energy.
Its mystical discovery by earlier philosophies of science of the eastern world to show you something evident:
Because the 3 arrows of time are every where, all human cultures have known about it by observing reality with human senses, crafting the past-present-future systems of all verbal languages with that view, and understanding that all systems go through 3 ages of time, corresponding to those arrows, the young-entropic-moving age the mature, reproductive, energetic age that combines those motions with a growing aware of form, of information, which comes to dominate the third age of timespace systems, and finally dies in an entropic big-bang explosion.
The formalism of the fractal ∆§t±¡ universe is I-logic Geometry and ¬Ælgebra (existential Algebra), the 2 most used terms to describe the topo-logic structure of a Universe of fractal spaces and temporal energy. Existential Algebra is my favorite term, for all what has to do with the symbolic equations of non-Æ, I-logic geometry. So those are the wor(l)ds of most often used. ¬Æ, the best abbreviation.
The equations of ¬Æ are those of Dimotions of time§paces.
For example, V=s/t is a ¬Æ equation, which we must interpret better in terms of Ðimotions as:
Constant lineal inertia (motion) = $(λ) x ƒð = K
A case of the most general Metric of all possible time space demotions, ‘SxT’=K.
How many times of equation of Ðimotions of space-time there are, how much are related to the fractal generator, as all of them are sub-cases of the generator, how to connect them with the equation and laws of each science is the formalism of the stience of exist¡ences.
The organic and sentient properties of the universe.
This said the equation is a logic equation, whose fundamental properties to facilitate creation are ‘relativity’, ‘anti-symmetries’ and ‘organicism’, words hardly understood in the context of present philosophy of science.
Let us deal first with relativity, then organicism and finally with symmetry.
3 errors to correct to understand the immortal Universe: entropy, big-bang and quantum uncertainty.
Let us then give a prime on the PHILOSOPHY OF REALITY ONCE WE UPGRADED IT TO THE ∆•st elements of reality.
¬Æ-method: S@≈∆ð view of atoms and galaxies and its Q, G forces.
The formalism of 5D-fractal Universes ads toexperimental facts, (E) and the Correspondence principle with classic science (C), the Disomorphic, organic method of extracting the whys of reality from the scalar properties of the 5th dimension (∆) and the symmetries between formal space, space-time energy and time motion (S≈T), cupped by the critical analysis of the @-mental distortions of inflationary languages as mirrors of the Universe. So we have a much deeper insight on the ‘whys’ of both, experimental facts and classic science modelling. It is then obvious that most corrections on classic science to match ‘experimental fact’ today often ignored to uphold the classic theories come from the understanding of the fractal structure of space and cyclical nature of time.
Let us consider the case of astrophysics: cyclical time defines the vortices of space-time of the 3 scales, or singularity-masses (gravitational scales), thermodynamic vortices (eddies) and charges (quantum vortices), which can be unified as attractive vortices (time view) or space curvatures of the 3 scales:
So why astrophysicists ONLY consider the expansive entropy of space between galaxies and do NOT put it together with the inverse arrow of informative creation of mass? IT IS NOT because of true science and the experimental method (put below for good measure in its principles: evidence, known cause, economy and no-falsification, which happens only when we take into account both vortices of relative future mass and expansive sheets of entropic space), but because of historic cultural reasons, often hidden as secret agendas of dogmatic religion or dogmatic science.
Anti-Symmetry. And social parallelism.
Anti-Symmetry though is the fundamental property in terms of logic thought of the Universe. To fully grasp it we consider the ternary symmetries of scales, ages and adjacent topologies, which structure the being internally through ∆±1 scales, in time through 3 ages and in space externally through its 3 topological forms, all of them expressed in the generator equation:
∆-1: Generation > ∆º: $t |-lineal limbs/potentials (dominant in a past young age) <: ∑∏ iterative, hyperbolic ø-body-waves (dominant in an iterative present) > ∆+1: O-Particle-head, which commands the being as a whole in an external world, dominant in its future 3rd age, before the system explodes entropically ∆+1<<∆-1.
To notice then how reality can be observed through those anti-symmetries, which mean the properties of each of the two extremes of the 3 ternary elements of reality are anti-symmetric to each other and so they cancel each other. That is cells/atoms/individuals are to the wholes antisymmetric as they maximise information vs. energy-size; limbs/potentials are to the heads/particles also antisymmetric in lineal and cyclical form; and the first age of life or relative past dominated by lineal motion is antisymmetric to the 3rd age dominated by cyclical form.
But because the system is ternary, the anti symmetries of time-ages, space-topologies and scales become merged into the present-hyperbolic body-wave interacting and mixing together to form a single one.
So the best expression of the game is a present body-wave breaking constantly its symmetry into two opposite functions that can either annihilate each other, as waves do or complementary reinforce each other, concepts those hardly used in science beyond physics and even there ill-understood that now we expand to all sciences.
Indeed, in physics much has been done about the term symmetry which is NOT really that relevant, because even when physicists define symmetry they are in fact talking of a mirror symmetry, which is an inversion or a bilateral symmetry which is also an inversion so they are forms of topological antisymmetry, of two identical social parts.
Yet the game as a game of identical social parts is an element of fractal organicism. This parallelism of beings which are clones by reproduction of each other and the asymmetry between systems that are complementary to each other and meet in the middle term, are essential elements to make sense of how reality, comes together and pegs into a single being.
ITS TERNARY ¬Æ LOGIC.
In 5D metric LocoMotion is as the next graph shows a reproduction of form in adjacent regions as a wave displaces switching then into particle-gauging state; hence the Universe reproduces information:
The ternary principle…
…follows closely the Rashomon effect, when we eliminate the more subjective, linguistic mind-element, • from the equation and provide only an objective external analysis of the being. Then we shall find that we can divide always the being into further ternary parts, or include it within a ternary part of a larger whole of its world. And so the ternary and rashomon events combined, bring us…
∆@S≈T ¬Ælgebra: the fractal generator.
The formalism of the super organism, the ‘fractal generator’ is a topo-bio-logical equation which reflects the ternary symmetries between scales, topologies and ages of a super organism, and its time world cycle. As a fractal generator, is a deceptively simple equation, as a logic mirror of the Universe and its parts, a tool of mathematical logic to study the common properties of all system of the Universe.
Now a great deal of mathematical physics has to do with the understanding of the inner structure and non-Æ formal relationships with the fractal generator of the supœrganism, and mathematical physics is not an exception.
The fractal generator is the formalism of the supœrganism. NONÆ LOGIC IS THE SEQUENTIAL AND SIMULTANEOUS SPACE-TIME TOPO-LOGIC laws that allow us to manipulate and study sections of the fractal generator. And so we obtain from it many ratios and relationships.
The study of the fractal generator thus can be done in mere mathematical, reductionist terms, but it is of more importance to study it as a logic-mathematical mirror of the entity in itself, the supœrganism and its ωorldcycle.
GST departs from a simple Concept: the properties of reality derive from its ultimate substance cyclical space an fractal time.
Those 2 substances, combine into present energetic space-time beings, and so we can write for all beings; a ‘generator equation’ of the three arrows/substances of space-time of which the being is made and then obtain from them the laws, ‘isomorphisms’ or ‘invariances’ that are common to all systems of reality.
In fact all systems of reality can be described as ‘fractal supœrganisms’ made of ‘lineal limbs/fields/moving platforms of spatial entropy’ and ‘cyclical particles/heads/chips’, which store clocks of temporal nformation, joined by an intermediate, hyperbolic space-time body-wave, extending at least in 3 relative ‘scales of size and time speed’ (ab.∆±1). So we can write a synoptic equations or ‘fractal generator’ of space-time beings, which we study in depth in this post:
Œ ≈ ∆-1 (entropy): |-Spe < ∆: ØS≈Tƒ > ∆+1: @ (mind)
Whereas Œ is any super organism of space-time extending those three scales, the atomic/cellular, organic/thermodynamic and gravitational/social scales, composed of limbs/fields of spatial entropy (|-spe), which extract motion from lower scales or territories (∆-1), feeding a balanced body-wave, Ø-St, guide by a singularity or mind made of clocks of temporal information, Tiƒo (head-particle), which observes and disguise the system through its upper scale, ∆+1 or relative world:
All what we see are super organisms created by the actions of a singularity that synchronise the parts of the being through three networks of entropic, feeding, reproductive and informative, perceptive form; creating ‘still pictures’ of present-spacetime – those super organisms, which a mind sees as a whole, freezing longer flows of in/form/ation, forms-in-action that leave a memorial trace perceived as a separate being, as they perform cyclical events from past to future.
In the graph the metric equation of 5D with its different speeds of time clocks that define a scalar Universe. is with the three modes of timespace change, the 2 fundamental advances needed in philosophy of time-change to fully understand and resolve the pending questions of most sciences.
The generator equation is the most used fractal formalism on GST, which portraits all Œ, Oganic ternary systems, in terms of its ‘spatial’, ‘temporal’ and and scalar dimensional symmetries. As we write it most often with the content of its three topological forms, ‘constrained’ by the limits of its ∆-1 scale from where its limbs/fields extract entropic motion, and the ∆+1 world in which its particles-heads obtain information, we consider the generator the best expression of the entity in space:
Γœ:∆-1(entropy)>Spe (past-lineal fields/limbs) < ∆º:ST (Present hyperbolic body/waves) >Tiƒ (future informative cyclical particles-heads)>∆+1@
This simple sentence encodes the meaning of all systems of reality, made of 3 topological space-time forms/functions, energy, entropy and information,structured across a series of scales of different size and speed of its time clocks.
UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR ≈ FRACTAL GENERATOR
FOR ALL WHAT HAS BEEN SAID, It follows that all languages ultimately follow a Universal ternary grammar, Space < Operandi > Time, which mirrors space-time a(nti)symmetries… So all…
- Syntaxes of spatial, mathematical and temporal, logic, verbal languages use ternary elements to explain reality…relating with its verbs/operandi the nature of those 2 simplest substances of which all seems to be made; the motions of cyclical time clocks and the meaning of space dimensions, and its scientific combinations..
They are the simplest elements and all process of reality have them… starting with the motion stored in space vacuum & the information carried by the frequency and form of the time cycles of the smallest particles, which give us together the first energies of reality… THROUGH all scales, each one reflecting a similar ternary:
Γ: S@ <≈> ∆ð Universal grammar.
So S <≈> T Is the minimal TRIAD OF elements for any T.Œ , defined by its ‘Fractal Generator’.
The most general above is a logic equation, which resumes the syntax of all languages and hence unifies them all (verbal, visual, mathematical thought), and so it can unify also all the forms of knowledge derived from those languages (mathematical physics, verbal evolution, visual arts, etc.).
Since the Universe has 3 dimensional elements, plus a scalar repetitive structures of 4D parts and 5D wholes.
‘Spe: spatial lineal momentum’ +Tƒ, temporal information (stored in the form and cycles of angular momentum, of clocks of time); and its combinations, space-time actions of energy described by verbs or mathematical operand.
Spe (space)<energy>Tiƒ (Time): red-motion < Green: energy> Blue-information. F(x): Space ≈ G(Y), Time function.
Informative subject<verb: action-Energy> object: entropy.
Height-informative pole x length, motion point = width energetic-reproduction point and so on.
To which we must add a ‘new 5th dimension’ of scalar parts that become wholes, which reality shows, as it builds from particles atoms, then molecules, cells, matter, organisms, solar systems, galaxies, Universes.
And so languages reflect clearly with the iteration of its simpler 3 elements, which become ‘longer sentences’ in treatise combinations, the higher language of T.œ.
In maths, we can see the duality and scalar growth reality in its series of operandi: Sum/rest->multiplication/division->potency/logarithm.
In words, we have 3 elements and 3 scalar growths: sentence, paragraph, narrative.
So happens in geometry in 3 scales: point->line->plane->volume and so on.
Thus, the elements of each T.Œ, and its jargon/language, once we understand in those ternary terms, both ‘reality’ and the languages that describe it in different sciences, each one specialised in a relative scale of the ‘5th dimension’ become clear in all languages: mathematical physics & chemistry, to which biology ads verbal evolutionary languages, arts substitutes the spatial geometry of mathematics by the visual perception of the human eye, and history introduces the subjective ethics of the wor(l)d.
So the astounding quantity of data gathered by each science, fits within the scaffolding of the Generator Equation, from where each language departs, in which the equations, postulates and statements of each scalar science are defined.
Thus T.Œ will not only classify all sciences, but not surprisingly will reveal an enormous number of solutions to pending questions of those sciences, thanks to the new understanding of its 3 fundamental elements, and its laws, fractal space, cyclical time and the scalar dimension, whose properties and Generator equations, will be proved ad nauseam for each science and each scale.
I. TRUTH IN LANGUAGES: MAX. TRUTH = MAX. POV. RASHOMON TRUTHS.
The justification of the Rashomon ‘effect’ or Rashomon truth, the concept used in this blog to explore the truths of all systems, departs from a simple reality: the Universe is a fractal organism of ternary scales that co-exist together, ternary time ages/dimensions between entropic death and social, informative generation and multiple topologies.
So as all those levels happen in the same being at the same time and in the same ‘closed space’ of a super organism, within a given membrane that breaks it from the rest of reality to observe and extract the truth of the system we must cast our linguistic analysis from all those perspectives, which we resume in four, the ∆§ scalar view, the temporal view of its world cycle, ð, the spatial simultaneous organic view… and the languages we use to observe all this which will mirror a ternary syntax, @, from a point of view or mind, often biased to observe the event from its advantageous biological needs.
So S, @, T, ∆, are the minimal elements to observe reality. But how we ‘connect’ them? Here is where we need the most important, yet less understood element of reality – the vital operandi that connect them through flows of transformative energy, ≈, scattering motion, < and implosive in-formation, > (lineal and angular momentum in physical jargon), whose exchanges constantly adapt reality. So we write the simplest ‘Fractal Feed-back generator’ equation, which ALL languages model in its syntax, with those 4 elements and its a(nti)symmetric operandi (ab. for symmetric, ≈, antisymmetric, < and asymmetric, > relationships between them):
This is the essence of reality. Why we group space and minds? Easy, because space is the perception of a simultaneous still reality which IS NOT ‘real but’ a slice of the infinite real motions of the Universe, stopped by the languages of the mind that lock in a mirror image in its smaller finitesimal mind reducing reality. So we can also write the previous equation in its simplest mathematical formulae, or equation of the mind as:
O (finitesimal mind) x ∞ (timespace cycles of the Universe) = C-onstant world view: linguistic mapping.
On the other side thus we write ∆ð, the REAL UNIVERSE OF INFINITE TIMESPACE CYCLES IN MOTION, as the substance of reality is MOTION, not space-form. This little understood fact of reality, proved by evidence that all what exists, including particles are motions, and form are angular momentum, cyclical motion seen as still form when it is very fast, as the ‘fixed’ wheels of a bicycle seem to us a solid form, IS the key to fully grasp why THE UNIVERSE never stops. Why there is balance between vortices of mass (galaxies) and big-bang entropic vacuum – the only element reductionist physicists use to describe it in their faulty big-bang WHICH REJECTS gravitational informative forces… Why ultimately all is a zero sum of lineal motion and cyclical angular momentum, closed in vital energy cycles.
So it is ALL really easy to understand when we get to the final principle. And a good language will be one, which makes a best mirror with minimal deformation of all what we have said.
Problem with huminds (ab. human mind) is that they DONT MAKE good mirrors, but ARE COMPLETELY SELF-ABSORBED by the paradox of the mind-ego, who thinks his still mapping of reality is the whole Universe, not a simplified mirror, so what huminds have been hard at doing for 5000 years and counting is to DENY, that motion not their STILL mapping is the substance of the Universe, that they are NOT the centre – the still mapping distorts and makes them the centre, of NOTHING, not even of scales, which they also deny, as they deny reproductive properties to quarks and electrons, etc. etc.
I am frankly completely fed up of huminds, including scholars, which are busy-busy for 5000 years inventing false dogmas about the self-importance of man, first of religious origin, then of scientific origin – even worst because they believe even more in its truth, such as the previously explained ‘dogma’ of the big-bang. So we ARE not the only intelligence. Languages perceive in themselves, in the pan psychic Universe. You are NOT the best talker. Even an atom speaks better geometric mathematical languages. WE are not the preferred scale. You are NOTHING: AN Infinitesimal mind mapping in a 1 dimensional minimal ‘bit’ language words, reality with a distorted self-centred view. OK?
OF COURSE, not… fact is humind won’t change its structure. They ONLY see a scale of reality so they are only interested in their scale. They only exist from the point of view of the earth, so they won’t care about the organic properties of atoms and galaxies. They want to be the absolute intelligence that knows it all, the beginning and the end, so they love the idea they have found the eureka moment in the big-bang, regardless of vortex of gravitation, and so on and so on. This I learned in 30 years of random speaking on 5D: You might as well talk chinese to an ant-hill… Humans are children of thought and they just want to hear baby-talk as if it were that important. Baby talk today is done with math equations, before with words, but is always creationist baby talk. The ant only wants pheromones – light frightens her, it has no senses to grasp it. Humans see only this scale, and from their point of view. So you collide with their ‘intuition’ of self-importance centre – only if they can come out of their mind they might see themselves as part of the whole.
And scientists I repeat are equally good at NOT seeing themselves as part of it. Their data is better – conceded, but that has again reduced their ‘view of knowledge’ to accumulation of data, NOT interested in causality laws, and general laws, but accumulation of computer data and statistical methods of finding causal connections in an automaton manner, not SEARCHING, NOT THINKING EVEN POSSIBLE what we shall show in this blog – the deeper level of causality and organic laws of the fractal Universe, the ‘thoughts’ of God of which we are all organic details. It won’t be baby talk.
The only scientific philosophy: organicism.
I know I shoudn’t have started the blog with a philosophical comment on the subjective human ego; which is unassailable to objective criticism – it merely dismisses the critique. But awareness of the bias of the human ego is essential to probe further into reality and dismiss our ego centered truths.
Since only the being has all its information about itself. So human knowledge will always be tainted by the observer, his languages, pre-conceived ideas about the object perceived and the specific ‘flow of information’ that ‘translates’ the intrinsic properties of the being through a medium into a ‘human electronic brain’ and its languages of representation.
Truth, being and substance.
There is NOT such fact as ‘truth’ inherent to a language, not even mathematics, but humans need to believe in the concept of truth. All acts of knowledge though are ‘censored’ by all those elements between ‘truth’ – the being in itself, and the observer’s language. How the ego has solved this paradox – in the simplest, most reductionist way – to consider the language truth in itself, in the past the ‘words’ that created in religion reality, in the present ‘mathematical mirrors’ and its instruments of measure:
Let us then consider what of the 3 traditional theories about the substances of which reality are made, is more objective, scientific and real – a Universe created by the will of verbal God (Abrahamic religions), a Universe composed of abstract mathematical objects similar to machines, (Platonic physical philosophies of reality) or a Universe made of relational, ‘organic’ space-time.
We depart from a closer approximation to truth (but not necessarily the whole of it): both words and maths are mirrors of a ‘reality closer to the truth’, a substance we shall call ‘space’ and ‘time’, whose main properties are ‘form’ and ‘motion’, and those ‘states’ are ‘symmetric’, such as space≈time, form≈function (motion). And more over, there are ‘varieties’ of those space≈time ‘symmetries’, we shall call ‘Dimensions of space-time’. And so we shall NOT build reality from ‘numbers and points’ the ‘time and space mirrors’ of mathematics, or ‘verbs and names’, the time and space mirrors of words, but from ‘space and time’ and its ‘5 main modes/dimensions/varieties’.
This will already put back many readers, mostly from the ‘school of physics’, and the ‘age of digital computers’, which subconsciously ‘think’ as Planck put it that only what we measure is truth. So we shall bring from the section of epistemology a first simple definition of truth and use for that aim the ‘concept of probability’, in the classic terms (akin somehow to the way quantum physicists use it):
Truth only exists in the being itself, which holds the ‘one≈1 truth’ about itself; all languages are ‘mirrors’ that hold partial images and carry quantities of information about the being inferior to 1. Hence the maximal truth of a being will be established with the maximal number of ‘mind mirrors’ on it.
We are not interested on the ‘quantification of truth’, with some pedantic, mathematical model (which will after all be only a mind-mirror), but in the concept of Upanishads, ‘the language of truth are infinite’.
Truth and language.
Further on, we shall define as obvious that the human brain IS verbal in its ultimate language of truth – the only language which can be used to mirror all other languages despite attempts in the digital age to express all other languages with digital thought (a trend started by Hilbert, which peaked with clear flaws in the Tractatus of Wittgenstein was really aborted by Godel (but as an ‘inconvenient truth, dismissed in the digital era, and now has become canonical – truth must be shown in a digital computer model). Here is the problem of that approach: digital truth will be the truth of the digital computer, electronic mind when AI comes into consciousness; but for us is not, reason why IN FACT we do translate further digital thought into image modeling; but that is not again human truth, but a visual, shallow first mirror that has buried in digital layers its underlying structure.
All this we said because this blog will be extremely verbal AND MOST ‘digital believers’ will dismiss its approach, but IT IS ONLY possible as it is for humans (maybe, I increasingly believe it will only flourish when AI becomes conscious), to explain the properties of ‘space and time’, with logic, verbal, temporal and naming spatial mirrors. We thus acknowledge that TRUTH is in the being.
Truth is about the ultimate substances of reality, space and time. Truth is better mirrored as the most general language, used by many species, and likely by atoms, to gauge information, with mathematical mirrors of space, points and time, numbers (NOT sets and structures BORN of the top of the humind, (ab. human mind) but from the bottom up as in classic maths), but as we are humans, truth for humans is better expressed by the subconscious trees of meanings and relationships, metaphors and mirrors of space, time and symmetry of the verbal language, which is also the one most people understand and the one we can better use to ‘simplify’ the essential properties.
This said we have though to dismiss other ‘creationist theories’, including those verbal and mechanical of people who under the ego paradox always thought truth must be expressed in the language they understand. And the substance of truth was the ‘instruments’ or ‘medium’, which brought from the being data on the language they understood, such as:
Being in itself (1 single full truth of moving time cycles) < Instruments of gauging (biased translation) > Spatial, mind Language (less than one truth).
Mechanisms or organisms.
Immediately it appears obvious that what we call ‘mechanism’, the idea that the structure of the Universe is like a machine comes merely from the fact that humans since physics became a mechanical science, has been using machines to measure time (clocks) and space (telescopes) that substituted human eyes and words, and were obtaining data which was expressed in the ‘future language of intelligent machines – aka modern chips… And so it is truly not a Universal theory but the natural bias of the previous equation: we gauge time with clocks and get numbers and think a Kepler did that:
So regarding the structure of the Universe the first question to answer, after we set aside ‘verbal religious creationism’ an digital mechanical creationism is now simpler: What is the Universe – an organism or a mechanism?
Since we have defined the substance of all realities as space and time, NOT as numbers, words, and accepted multiple instruments to measure space and time, all biased ‘mirrors’ that translate space and time into a language, of which there are multiple, infinite (we can smell, see, measure, name space and time, and each of those languages will be a mirror of less than 1=one truth), the question reduces to this: is space and time, regardless of mirror or language, in itself, an organism or a mechanism.
And here we are of the opinion of the first scientists such as Newton who considered space the ‘plenum’, the body of ‘God’ its ‘time seer’ in words of Saint Augustine, following Plato’s dictum that reality is an organism with a body called the Universe (space) and mind called logos (time logic)… So Aristotle would call his unification theory the organon, and Kant and Schopenhauer, and any serious philosopher before or after would agree, that as Leibniz put it, reality is made of relational space and time, structured in many scales, such as each point is a world in itself, something confirmed by quantum ‘censorship’… the fact that particles appear as points, but when giving enough energy to ‘inflate’ they show inner structure – entire worlds within it.
Let us then as those are the minimal units of reality show how ‘particles’ and by extension anything else can be explained as a game of the 5 dimensions of space-time and give a first approach to what those dimensions are.
The fractal inner parts of the point: quantum censorship.
A physical system in its ground state tends to remain there, if little energy is input, betraying no evidence of its internal structure. Only when we excite it into a higher state, do complexities emerge. This is the essence of Quantum Censorship that extends to all scales of the Universe: all systems have opaque membranes very difficult trespass for larger entities outside the point, as they are too big and too slow; and inner systems within the point, as they are ‘closed within a hard-outer membrane’ that breaks space-time into fractal parts.
So to break that membrane an enormous energy is required.
Thus, below an energy threshold, atoms appear to be the “hard, massy, impenetrable” units Isaac Newton inferred, which for most practical purposes only possesses an intrinsic property called angular momentum, or spin, and 3 external measurable ones that must be ascribed hence to the outer world, lineal motion or speed and mass and charge, two fields of that outer spatial world…
Yet when the electron is supplied more energy their components can be torn out: When one supplies enough energy — at least 1 MeV, corresponding to the unearthly temperature 10¹° K — to unleash electron-positron pairs, the electron’s structure is revealed.
So space and time, the substance we claim to be found in all beings, including the simplest beings of all, electrons (and quarks) has two obvious qualities: it is related to ‘conserved entities’ of which we know 3 lineal momentum≈motion, angular momentum≈cyclical motion, its ‘volume’ or vital energy, and to two scalar properties, it is made of wholes, which can be broken into parts.
Let us then call the property of the disconnected parts of a being, the fourth dimension of entropy and that of the larger whole, interconnected the 0-5th dimension (0 when seeing as a fractal non-euclidean point, 5th, when the point can be seen enlarged with multiple parallels that cross it), and since now we have ‘visual, geometrical images’ of those dimensions, make a first drawing of them
In the graph, to the 3 conserved elements of Nature, angular momentum akin to a time cycle, lineal motion akin to a space surface and its combinations of vital energy, which suffice to ‘construct’ most systems of nature, with ‘lineal Limbs/potentials < hyperbolic body-waves > spherical particle-heads,we just need to ad two organic arrows of life emergence from a lower scale of reality and its inverse arrow of entropic scattering and dissolution to define all systems of nature as organic systems ensemble of those 3 parts, which follow a world cycle of life and death between generation an extinction.
Are those ‘dimensions of space-time organic or mechanic’? We have put below some ‘species’ that reflect the form and function of those dimensions from both organisms of biological nature, mechanisms of perception and motion (camera, missile) and then two physical systems of the quantum world (a particle being generated and a field of reproductive motion called light.) The obvious answer is that ‘all those systems are organic’, and just two more illustrations will suffice: the first one shows you that a machine IS nothing but a form of metalife evolving:
So it is obvious that the industrial r=evolution evolves machines into organisms and that should thoroughly dismiss the argument.
The synchronies and constants of the system;
It must then be necessary to consider the parameters of quantitative measure which will differentiate the different species of the Generator according to the time-space parameters it will display.
It must be noticed then that for all structures of Nature, generated by the ternary symmetries of ∆st, there must be at least a unifying single parameter, which all the parts of the system will synchronise together, and this will be the fundamental constant of the system, most likely a ‘time clock’, rhythm at the heart of the œ-being.
I.e. for humans it is the second that synchronises the heart beat, the eye-thought glimpse and the leg 1 meter steps. It is then from this first fundamental time parameter, which locates roughly the system within certain Sp x Tƒ=∆§cale from where we can build the three key Universal constants, s x t=momentum, t/s=density, s/t=speed, of the system.
Ie. in a human system the second will give us the step of a meter, which defines the steps of space, st-e(n)t(ro)p(y) units, which for man is a meter, the common length of our legs. So we can obtain our speed, 4 km, hour, consider the usual decametric ratios of acceleration (so our speed can reach 9 x 4 = 36 km.)
It is precisely that hidden ‘full program’/structure of the supœrganism applied to all systems from a simpler electron-photon quantum ensemble to the human beings, which will unify it all.
As a system is determined within a range of variations by the need to balance its different elements. I.e. a being with a ‘second’ time clock, belonging to the human biological ∆º scale should not display a limb/field step of much more than a second. As such the adjustable harmonies of all the beings of all the scales of reality is what makes so constant the ratios, parameters, relationships and decametric, ternary scales of the universe, which is an enormous puzzle constantly rewritten with the same letters by the game, but unlike Borges’ Babylon library, we do not have a chimp just banging the typewriter but an ‘excellent grammatical master’ with a penchant for ternary syntax.
So for a computer the Herztian clock-speed determine in turn all the other ‘symmetric, symbiotic and balanced’ elements which will be connected to it. And you would expect them to balance the capacity of thought of the computer. For a faster insect we will have a smaller steps; for a larger dinosaur a slower metabolic clock, and so on.
The study of the generator for each specific being, becomes then the common scaffolding of laws, and sub-parameters and sub-equations, which will define the specific actions, parts and events of the world cycle of each •œ.
The mind rules the entire system, and this is shown in a simple fact: its time clocks are synchronised with all the clocks of the system, directing them. The mind thus is the seer of time that ‘moves throughout time’ the entire supœrganism.
An interesting property to consider at this stage regarding the time clocks of the three parts of the being is its synchronicity. Indeed, consider your three parts, limbs/legs, body-heart and mind-eye, the three are synchronised to your unit of information/clock of a second, the glimpse of an eye, the beat of the heart, the rhythm of a one meter step (your unit of space) But those are human measures. A system does is both ‘pegged in space’ and isolated by a membrane from the rest, ‘breaking space into inner and outer parts’ (first postulate of topology: a closed loop breaks space). And with an inner synchronised clock. And this is also the case of physical systems, as we shall see when studying the realist interpretation of quantum physics (Einstein->Broglie->Bohm), which departs from the assumption than the ‘quantum field, body-wave and particle ternary parts’ of the quantum system have an inner synchronised clock (complementary wave-particle theorem).
The study on how time clocks are in harmony is then a huge new field of science which will reveal truly the workings of all being.
It is this ‘generator equation of space-time beings, centred in the ‘world-mirrors/monads/minds’ that orders its ternary parts, the fundamental particle-equation of the Universe, which in its infinite variations represents all beings in existence.
Another way though to look at the value of the generator and its parts, is to consider how so often human theories of reality are ‘inflationary’ by design as they show all the different povs of the generator.
Truth requires at least four, ∆• st perspectives.
All this said, we shall find an astounding beauty in our analysis of reality as a homology between language-mirrors, minds and outer worlds.
For example, consider the very fact that mathematical systems are always self-centred analysis of reality departing from a coordinates 0-points of view, of which three are paramount, the cartesian hyperbolic ‘plane’, the ‘lineal cylindrical system and the ‘polar sphere’, mimicking the three elements of the generator, which GST considers the proof as those earlier philosophers of science postulate, that we exist in a sentient vital Universe. As mathematical laws in analytic geometry are self-centred. But those are three different perspectives, which if we ad Hilbert spaces and imaginary numbers ‘close’ the system of numbers because they ad the new dimensional planes of 5D: Four equivalent perspectives.
Indeed, if information can only be obtained from a fixed point of view, it follows the Universe is made of egos. Or as Aristotle put it, God is the unmovable ‘ego’ that moves all the energy around himself and there are infinite Gods, particles that gauge information, heads that see, minds that smell… This must therefore be included in the next paradigm of science to build an even more objective, less anthropomorphic reality.
In the graph we can see physical monads, charges and masses, which do have always a dense, informative center, surrounded by an energy body closed by a membrane (the quarks of the atoms closed by the membrane of the electron, the head and body closed by the skin, the mathematical pov, with its surface, integrated below the external curve, and so on. There are many ways we can see those structures, many details and laws we shall extract of the interaction of its parts, but the ultimate essence of the space-time being and its three parts, Tiƒ<st>Spe will remain.
Now in as much as the singularity is perceiving a territory closed by a cyclical membrane, either seen as a solid form or a moving cycle, the mind is NOT possible to be defined WITHOUT the territory of order and the event horizon, limit of its ‘self’ and close territory of order and perception. And so the mind is in itself a ternary organism, ab. œ, hence the name ∆œ and the symbol Œ for the mind as a point ∆º that moves Ξ, through the three planes and structures of its supœrganism.
Mind and supœrganism are thus defined by each other: the actions of the œmind brings the potential organism into actual being.
Consider the best known equations of science, and how they portray this reality in the scales of masses and charges:
Maxwell’s equations of electromagnetism reflect the fact that a charge, the singularity of an electromagnetic system (first equation), will have an electromagnetic ‘field’ around it, its vital space in which to exchange energy and information (3rd & 4th), encircled by a magnetic membrane (2nd equation), conforming the three parts of the being and its basic exchanges.
In the graph the laws of circulation of fluids and electric currents can be reused to the basic scheme of a ternary system with an inner solid state, a liquid around, within an external entropic field. Of course, the purpose of science being mostly praxis makes the algebraic equations far more useful but the purpose of this blog being the ultimate whys, the spatial view shows how once and again nature can be reduced to the three arrows of timespace and the scales of the fifth dimension.
And so IT happens for all laws of mathematical physics that we shall relate to the ‘laws and structures of ∆ºst systems’: its ultimate cause is NOT the fact they can be mirrored in a mathematical language but the fact they followed the ternary laws of GST, as 10 dimensional beings of fractal space-time, ∆ºst, which an ∆º mind with a self-centred pov can ‘perceive’.
Thus we shall see how ultimately mathematical physics is related to those laws: differential equations will express fundamental gst actions between scales of the fifth dimension (entropic motions will be described by derivatives of second order, energy actions by those of first order and so on); topological laws will combine the three only topological variations as expressions of the three arrows of timespace of all beings; and each of the mathematical equations will be expressed from one of the three topological frames of reference (cartesian, polar or cylindrical). And so on and so on.
Now we need before closing this intro to topological physics, to introduce a first variation on its theme: we say usually that the ðf mind is in the centre and the clock-circle in the external membrane, but as we study more systems in more scales we shall see that those positions in its control of the system are often exchanged, as both work always together to control the vital space, those variations are perfectly natural to the structure of systems. In the graph we see the earth has its brain in the surface – its life species, and its ‘heart’ in the magnetic centre, as humans do (and in life we find as in atomic matter, with the quark center, the opposite form, the cell with its DNA uncle).
IT IS THEN worth to notice that this symmetry will be one of the main dualities at play in all systems, as both together ‘invaginate’ and control the vital space and switch or invert the arrows and direction of its flows – given the fact that the fractal generator allows all time and space reversals and trans/formation within three ternary scales/forms & ages. Physicists have explored in depth of those symmetries, the time reversal one, but are still lacking on the other two main ∆st symmetries.
So for example, the magnetic field plays the role of membrane, when it jumps over the first scale of electrons and as the magnetic number, organises them all together, and can be considered then the social ‘brain’ of the atom; yet as the attractive domains plays the ‘force’ game in the next scaling, when its domains are organised by a looping wire in an electrodynamic engine.
The inversion law of scaling.
This is a very important law of the fifth dimension which can be extended to all systems, an essential symmetry of all ternary realities: the inversion of roles and functions as • singularities of systems emerge into new scales, becoming |-entropy of larger beings or vice versa, systems which were |-entropy become organised into larger forms, which then become O-cycles, as the cases mentioned on electromagnetism, or the proteins that encircle a vital space in a cell; or the Neanderthal crossed white, ‘germ-anic/semitic’ entropic cult(ure)s, which came ‘again’ on top of the informative, south Asian mongoloid farmers, when they associated with bronze and iron weapons as Nomad European cattle ranchers .
We could also use the term invariance for Disomorphisms, laws that doesn’t change when we move up and down in scale.
The method of GST is iterative, as the Universe is, departing from a few elements, which we constantly repeat with different degrees of complexity till in the final 4th line we, and those who will continue this endeavour, will exhaust all knowledge of mankind, within the properties of the ∆•ST universe and its fractal worlds. Let us then define the 4 elements of all realities:
∆. The fractal scales of…
ð. Cyclical time and…
$: .topological space, which…
@. Monads≈linguistic minds which map≈mirror reality, with…
TOPOLOGY and ternary TIME logic, which we will ‘upgrade’, to…
The non-aristotelian, multicausal logic of cyclic time & non-euclidean fractal structure of space…
∞|°: closer to the i-logic mind of the Universe, which creates and destroys all space-time beings, what we are.
RECAP: THE UNIVERSE IS SIMPLE BUT NOT MALICIOUS (Einstein)
‘Simplicity is genius’ Leonardo
You see how simple and easy to understand is the reproductive Universe when you change your chip, stop worshipping entropic digital robots, aka physicists with zero philosophical, conceptual intelligence, instead of the complicated, ill-interpreted views of physicists. Again for good measure: all is reproduction as even motion is reproduction:
A wave Motion on the other hand is the simplest information and moves faster because it need only to print a surface below, and again, the wave form that moves is independent of that indistinguishable lower level. So the wave keeps its form and travels truly fast as the in/form/ation, v=s/ti to imprint, is minimal.
Since motion is reproduction of information; motion is not only relative, but related to the density of information of a system. So as mass-information grows in density the system takes longer time to reproduce the Ti element of v=s/Ti, and so it slows down. And on the other extreme when information tends to zero speed increases. So as we humans perceive information with light that is our limit of speed of transmission of information we can perceive c=s/Ti. But this wave of light is really impressing a quantum field of gravitational action at distance, faster than light (Bohm’s discovery on the pilot-wave theory which we have to marry with the non-observance of particle during the motion, to fully grasp the process).
WHAT THE UNIVERSE ALLOWS according to existential i-logic.
So after this on-slaughter on our Popes and Masters and their mathematical fantasies, we are obliged to respond from the pov of GST to the big question: if languages are inflationary smaller beings with maximal information, but can be fiction, what is real, what the Universe allows?
The answer should be obvious to the reader: reality we have repeated ad nauseam is composed of present energetic beings that combine entropy-motion and information; so the Universe allows only information that respects the constrains of motion-entropy, which it must bend, and as entropy motion is lineal, the Universe is ‘simple and not malicious’ (Einstein), since ‘simplicity is true genius’ (Leonardo), as only those efficient, economic, simpler versions of reality Survive (Ockham’s razor).
But the ego of human scholars is huge so among humans egotist theories of reality always carry the day. AND PEOPLE truly love them, because they make them think they are ‘above heavens and earth’, intelligent enough to talk the language of God.
Because you are not God, obviously (:
Ok, let us leave the physicists in peace and go back to our theme. Reality is ruled by Ockham’s razor. So simplicity is queen, and the capacity of an economic, single element to perform multiple functions and simplify reality is king, as all comes ultimately from two simple principles, space and time.
An the simplest expression of it all is therefore the fractal generator that considers the basic ternary structure in time, space and scales of any supœrganism, the fundamental particle of the Universe.
So we shall make a bold statement, which for 30 years of studying reality in its simplest elements, building complexity departing from them, has proved to be truth for all systems I have studied: The Universe is a fractal game of scales of timespace arrows; reflected in the formalism of its Fractal Generator: Γœ: ∆-1: Spe≤≥∆St≤≥∆+1: Tiƒ, with its ternary topologies, time ages and scales…
So the mirror of all mirrors, the language of all languages, the syntax of all syntaxes is the encoded 10 Dimensional laws of the ternary fractal generator, which resumes the non-Æ structure of the i-logic universe. And its non-euclidean space and non-aristotelian time properties that become laws of all stiences are the ‘elements of all realities’, which encode all its events and species, and by the same token, dismiss all other imaginary realities and linguistic fictions too ‘complex’, ‘too mad’ to make it.
It is the final ‘crib’ of reality. I.e. imaginary black holes do not exist because you cannot travel back in time, as the Universe is a fractal of infinite parts, so all time clocks are local and you only return back in time to your own devolutionary death-past-information erasing. Even if mathematically Mr. Hawking can describe black holes as time machines that ‘allow him to go to the past’ and kill his father. This is NOT A REAL paradox. If you travel back in time you go back to the lower seminal scale dying back into your cellular level and then as insects eat you up without the protection of the whole nervous system to the molecular level, since death according to the rules of ¬Æ logic based in the fractal structure of space, cyclical nature of time, scalar co-existence of organism AND OVERWHELMING experimental evidence in all systems that die, entropic death lowers your ‘ego-self-system’ two scales of the fifth dimension.
We can see in the first graph, how all physical, biological and social systems, follow the same ‘worldcycle’ of existence as a travel through 3 ∆±1 scales of the fifth dimension, as they are born in a seminal seed that emerges into an ∆º scale, where it will move decreasing its motion and increasing its information through a gaseous, young state of minimal information, through a reproductive, liquid state of balance into a 3rd age of maximal information, exploding back its form into motion, in the entropic process of death.
All the organic systems of the Universe, physical, biological and historic, follow the same 5 Dimensional states of a worldcycle, from its fast evolving relative 5th dimension or generation age of social evolution from an ∆-1 seed to an emerging ∆º individual through the 3 dimensional ages of life, to the 4th dimension of entropic death..
What physicists do with its simplified models of 4 Dimensions, is to reject the arrow of social evolution, love and organic information, which is the 5th dimension of creating wholes by parts, because of its ‘concept of time’ merely as change of motion, locomotion, lineal motion, which then for the whole Universe becomes the arrow of ‘entropy and death’, and we shall adscribe by the correspondence principle to the fourth dimension.
THE WHOLENESS OF THE GENERATOR
Death then exists, as a partial equation of the Generator according to ¬Æ rules: BY MERELY extracting an inverse partial equation from Γ.œ:
∆+1 Tƒ<<∆-1: $p; that is the mind-whole of the ∆+1 scale dissolves bak to its minimal parts, the spatial past, lineal entropic ∆-1 elements.
Thus the symbols of the generator, which encode both the metric of 5D, the ternary topologies of supœrganisms, the ages of time AND in its operandi, the past to future, present to past, present to future, future to past flows of entropy, energy and information, define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the co-invariant laws of space-time beings.
We can of course being as pedantic and obscure, as complex in our other languages reflection of the Generator as we want when entering in details.
But ultimately in the final synopsis, all reduces to the ternary topological temporal and scalar ‘invariances’ of the generator as it reflects all possible arrows and forms of scalar Timespace (causal chains, sequential ages, topological ensembles, etc), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1
So we shall close this introductory note, with a consideration on the philosophical question of the limits of reality.
Now we shall make a bold statement, which for 30 years of studying reality has proved to be truth:
‘The Universe is a fractal game of scales of time arrows; reflected in the formalism of its Fractal Generator: Γœ: ∆-1: Spe<∆St>∆+1: Tiƒ, its ternary topologies, time ages and scales,
Thus the symbols of the generator define by similarity and combination in sequential sentences/equations all the invariances in space (topological invariances) and Time (causal chains, sequential ages), origin of all the events and forms of reality applicable to all entities of Existence: ∑Sp∆-1<∆ST>∏Tƒ∆+1
Such as the Universe allows any combination forwards in ‘informative, accelerated time’ (>) and backwards in entropic, expansive space (<) or without motion=change (=) in iterative reproductive time; any topological combination or transformation between Sp, Tƒ,<=>; any sequential sum of åctions (∆ï, ∆Sp, Sp<ST>Tƒ; ∑, ∏ ±∆ ) and any ∆±2 jump and/or transfer of energy, entropy and/or information between planes of existence (as systems co-exist in 3 scales) but NOTHING else.
So every equation, form and species of the Universe, event and world cycle can be described as a part (partial equation) of the generator an its many linguistic mirrors (universal syntax in grammar: Subject (Form) < Verb (action-momentum)> Object (entropy of subject); S(x)≈T(y) in maths, entropic red < yellow/green energy information>Blue form in colours, Height (information d) < width (reproductive d)>length(entropy d) and so on…
It also follows that all stiences and disciplines will find its theories as approximations to the generator, or partial equations and limits of models constructed with less dimensions, and such is the case of 4D ‘RELATIVITY’ physics, which converts world cycles with a lesser dimension in worldlines and the ∞ scales of ∆ into the single light space-time continuum.
III. HISTORY OF TIME-SPACE THEORY
Absolute relativity: the evolution of time logic about the ∞ Universe.
The very few articles I ever wrote in ‘paper format’ for congresses of systems sciences called the theory, absolute relativity, following the Correspondence principle, as it is basically the third and final instalment on the understanding of the ‘Paradox of Galileo’, after Galilean relativity and Einstein’s special and general relativity.
We shall see in fact that the Universe is ‘absolutely relative’, not only on motion (Einstein’s relativity, without preferred location), form (Darwinian evolution without man as a perfect form) but also in scales, as each ‘entity’ has a limit of its capacity to perceive larger and smaller scales of information, which in the human case extends to the galactic and atomic scale, of similar properties, distorted by the distance to our 5D position in the Universe. And so those limiting physical scales are NOT the origin of the laws of reality but only the limit of human perception of the fractal Universe.
And only a science that studies all the scales together in equal footing, void of power agendas, or historic hang-ups and dogmas, will be able to fully grasp the synthetic laws common to them all. This is the task we shall carry in this blog.
Why i couldn’t convince academia then, I adscribe – making an analogy, to the enormous scope of the upgrading of all sciences. Indeed, if an infamous comment on the paradoxes of scale, says that ‘if you murder a person you become a criminal, but if you commit a genocide of millions, you become a patriot and war hero’, in science the reverse is truth, if ‘you find a very small detail, best with huge spending on ‘machines’ in our ‘technological civilisation’, you become a hero and get a nobel prize, but if you find the key to an extraordinary new upgrading of the ultimate elements of all sciences, that will trigger thousands of new discoveries and improvements in all of them, as all of them are ‘stiences’ of space-time – something that happens only once a century (unfortunately genocides seem to be more common), everybody feels ‘insulted’ because it means they are NO longer high popes and experts of their discipline, and feel invaded by the ‘amateur polymath philosopher’ that dares to change the whole outlook of all of them.
So the great advances on timespace theory, once a century have been shunned off and only brought into light at the end or after the life of his discoverers. In the graph:
And as I didn’t get any interest on it among the ‘resident Nobel prizes’, I self-published a book with its basic tenants which I sent to hundreds of Universities worldwide asking for funding to complete the model and r=evolve all sciences – only the catholic University of Philippines responded that it had shelved the book in its library… This is the book:Now for the graph of my book ‘error’ was used in the sense of the part of a measure we don’t know – not an error but a missed part. And that was indeed what was missed in Einstein’s work, the fifth dimension and the symmetry of space and time and in Darwin, the social evolution or fifth dimension applied to biology and the laws of topological evolution which restrict to 3 only topologies the possible variations of a species and explains punctuated evolution.
It is obvious nobody cared to read it. Then for a year I sent small papers on the fundamental discoveries of each science, from the fractal non-Euclidean point and its r=evolution of maths, through the particle-wave duality explaining its meaning as well as a few other quantum conundrums, to the predictable cycles of economics, (other side of the book cover), predicting as earlier as 92 the 2008 crash of the age of minds of metal and following age of ‘neofascism’ and robotic wars… You name it. I only receive SILENCE… An absolute law of silence that has hovered over the most remarkable discoveries of philosophy of science… sience… silence.
It turns out that this seems to be the rule…
The bottom line though of all things humind is our astounding ego-centered beliefs and obsession for our ‘selves’ that make so hard to ‘feel connected’ to the whole space-time Universe. And it has so much limited any organic vital view of reality, in fact a philosophy of reality only present systematically in the Asian cultures, with taoist objective view of the Universe and the eclectic Northern Mediterranean world, with its emphasis on man as the measure of all things – hence the organism not the mechanism as its model, which is where I haul from.
Latter on, we shall place this work in the context of the european civilisation, as we are all KNOTS OF THOUGHT of our culture, and so it is not the individual but the culture, in my case the European Latin culture of ‘philosophers of science’, which at the end of its organic civilisation, produces its ‘eclectic, polymath’ philosophers of science, which resume the entire knowledge gathered by the culture, in its 3rd informative age.
So from the Greeks (I age of european logic, organic science) which at the end gave us Aristotle’s organon, first organic model of the Universe and father of the experimental method…
To the Italians, which at the end of renaissance in the II age of the latin organic, humanist culture, gave us the scientific-mechanic method (Galileo applying metal-eyes to measure space, telescopes and microscopes, and metal-brains to measure time, clocks…
to the late XX century, earlier XXI c. French-Spaniards, which discovered fractals (Mandelbrot), scalar physics (Nottale) and finally this work that establish scientifically the organic D-isomorphic nature of all space-time beings, (3rd age of the scientific, now experimental AND mechanical AND organic method).
So this is the ultimate meaning of this work, the final knot of thought of the 3rd age of the organic latin culture, in its eclectic final age of ‘philosophers of science’, the specialised scientific discipline which our culture has distinguished itself for, besides human senses/art. As we are NOT a specialised culture, fundamentalist of a single discipline and language of knowledge, but as the geographical world center placed between all other cultures, mixes all forms of knowledge, the a priori condition for a philosophy of science that pretends to be a theory of everything. So we mix the mechanical/digital worshipping of the north-european culture; the sensorial, life-oriented deep understanding of the african culture to the south; the verbal, ethic and organic i-logic of religious, semite cultures to the east; and in my case, the chip-me(n)tal culture of future sentient machines being born in US (as I worked after my failure to interest academia in wall street, hollywood and silicon valley as a system scientist)…
Only the arguably best tuned culture of the organic Universe, Asia is far away. But as i spent my adolescent forming years in South-east Asia, studying classic Asian, philosophies of the organic Universe, that influence is also factored in.
So far more important than my academic studies is the role of my mind as a neuronal cell of a human super organism of history, and that is how I always have interpreted my work.
So again my apologies if the blog is never properly completed. As of today the only part of this blog with ‘limited imperfections’ ends here – the rest have its chiaroscuros, second line best…
And yet the repetitive Universe is encoded in those few pages above… since ultimately its best mirror is a single equation-thought, S=T… iterated ad infinitum. The whole mirror of my mind occupies thousands of pages, handwritten, typewritten, digital in decades of research on boxes on my home at the 0-40 parallel, the geodesic eye of a sphere, by the side of the sea, on a garage on a small apartment called ‘terra’ – couldn’t have aother name. Just in case in the future huminds or AI care to search for those ‘leonardian notebooks’ to complete the model. I will try my best on this blog in the ‘remain of the days’.
In any case, now I enter my age of entropy, so time is limited to pour this information on the blog. So I do ask again help to the homunculus.
So, if any University wants to take seriously the completion of the model, under my guidance you can contact me. 10 being the perfect tetraktys that number of specialists would suffice – one Keynesian economist, one philosopher of science, one astrophysicist, one quantum physicist, one biologist, one mathematician, one historian, one engineer, one musician and one linguist.
Tips, I speak a bit of English, live in Europe, like good weather, have also lived in LA, London, Toronto and NY, so I just missed Australia (: and the underlying philosophy of the blog and 5D is closest to taoism: ‘yin-formation and yang-motion, combine to create the 10.000 ‘qi’-energy beings’.
This said, we can focus in solving the paradox of the mind: why the earth moves if the mind makes it still and how to overcome those mind limits and describe properly the time motions of the Universe, humans reduce with its mind to a single time-motion…
Saper Vedere, Qualis est brevis
There you have 5 men who have advanced our view of time. They have three things in common. They were all self-styled time theorists who advanced our understanding of timespace; they were all laughed at for most of his life, when not ignored or brutally attacked for such a feat; since none yielded to the established power and ‘passé’ theory of their age; and what matter most to the reader, they were all proved right as time passed by.
Now the graph last picture is a mega-selfie; (: i know, but what can i say?
Now more seriously, as we have explained ALL SYSTEMS ARE SELF-CENTERED IN A MIND-LANGUAGE, SO WE ARE ALL HUGE EGOES, but intelligence=objectivity make us also realise that is a MIRAGE OF THE MIND, so intelligent humans can ‘laugh at their egos’, with RELATIVISM.
SO WHY IT IS NATURAL THAT all humans, are so ‘ego-centered’, SCIENTISTS MUST ALSO recognise OBJECTIVELY ego-paradoxes are a cancer for science, on the view of such an astonishing, huge, similar Universe with NO preferred species, scale, or form.
So we have answered this paradox, explained earlier at the beginning of this section – the function of the mind and its equation that makes each of them the center of its subjective perception of the Universe, as a ‘knot of time’ cycles.
Let us then make a summary of how much a model of a Universe made of relational space-time ‘beings’ help us to understand the Universe – which is the theme of the second part of this blog, to show you that as usual the way to truly evolve science is ‘with thought experiments’ – with better models of reality, not with risky experiments.
DESCARTES: LIGHT SPACE-TIME, MIND-WORLDS
This specific time is cyclical time, ab.ð, which carries the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles. So while time is motion, we perceive its information mentally as ‘form’ in space. This first insight of the duality between time-motion, the whole and space-form, our perception (one of the many paradoxical dualities humans have so much difficulty to understand with their one-dimensional mind) IS the origin of Galilean relativity, never quite understood (why the Earth is seen in stillness if it moves). We bring it now so early as other paradoxes essential to the Universe (continuous forms seen in detail as broken parts, flat earths seen in larger view as cyclical form) to stress from the beginning the fact that the Universe on the whole is MOTION not form, the mind view; DISCONTINUOUS, not continuous, the mind-mapping puzzle, and CYCLICAL, CURVED, not flat, the small view.
Descartes vs. Galileo
In the XVII c. Descartes founded a mathematical artifice, the cartesian space-time plane, that allowed him to plot time in lineal terms and Galileo used it to define time as a parameter of lineal space-motions, reducing time studies to a single form of change and all its time clock cycles to a single time clock (time-space relativity, v=s/t, time as measure of translation, use of clocks, etc.):
So back to Descartes – a contemporary of Galileo, and the true founder of modern science with his ‘Method of reasoning’ and the Frame of Reference of the mathematical light space-time mind. He went even further – reason why we have NOT put Galileo but Descartes, the philosopher of science and Leibniz, NOT NEWTON, in our picture of the four magnificent, where only Einstein stands as a physicist master of space-time – in his intuitions of the 3 ‘elements’ that conform all systems, when he said that all what exists was made of:
– Open §pace, which he called ‘res extensa’; the vital energy of all systems,
– Enclosed by cyclical ðimes, which he called ‘vortices’.
And then he added a 3rd element, the final stroke of a genius unparalleled since the ðimes of Aristotle; after realizing that the only proof he had of the existence of those vortices and res extensa was, the fact that he perceived them: Cogito Ergo Sum. ‘I think therefore I am’.
So let us consider the final element of reality to be able to build the whole… the mind that projects and co-exists in those three scales ordering the parts into a whole and helping it through its actions to survive.
– The mind or •-point is the relative frame of reference that mapped the ∞ cycles of ðime of the Universe, reducing them to a ‘World’, to fit them into the infinitesimal volume of the brain.
•-mind x ∞-cycles = World: equation of the Linguistic Monad: ∞ Mind-Worlds in 1 Universe.
So we affirm, as Aristotle, Descartes and Leibniz before us, that even though for physical measure it might be useful to equalise all rhythms of time and peg all ternary space-time beings into an absolute space and absolute time – that of the human light space view and mechanical clock, there are infinite clocks of ðime, and infinite broken §paces and we adopt the point of view of all of them. SINCE THERE ARE ∞ MINDS, gauging information.
This is illustrated in the first graph. In the right side we see our Universe, which Descartes affirmed correctly in his book ‘the world’, it was truly the ‘mind of man’ and Kant realized it was a light-mind.
infinitesimal egos think to be ∞: mind paradox. Still languages=mappings of information≈Perception and its ∞ clocks.
We can now give the explanation of the Paradox of Galileo, which started modern science but has never been quite resolved: ‘why the earth moves but doesn’t move’.
Simple, because the mind-singularity that perceives it has as a function, to create within its language a still mirror image, a focus of reality that will allow to order it and try to deform it from its ego-centered perspective.
But to understand this Universe of self-centred mirrors, we must first clarify once and for all the error of Newton and its ‘absolute space-time’, with a single time-arrow (that of his infinitesimal clock-machine) self-centred in the human ego and its ‘second beat’ of existence, NOT the only time of the Universe.
In the next graph we can see the difference between Newton who THOUGHT the mind of man WAS the entire Universe, hence converting the Cartesian mind graph into the ABSOLUTE BACKGROUND SPACE-TIME that still lingers in science and Descartes who thought it was just of the many minds, possible with different geometries.
All what we have done till now is fair enough but external in its description. It lacks the ultimate evasive question – the will, which creates the ‘world as a representation’ biased by the entity to ‘break’ reality into the outer and inner world, and protect the survival of the inner world with those actions.
In other words, we need a mind able to perceive the whole as a whole separated from the outer world in which it interacts. And this was the understanding that started modern philosophy of science in the work of Descartes.
Descartes was not a simpleton. He was fully aware that what he had in the mind was not the whole Universe, so he expressly stated the fact, differentiating the ‘world’ of a human mind, from the infinite other worlds that exist outside, establishing in his little known book, the ‘world’, this difference, affirming that his ‘Cartesian Frame of reference’, was only that of the human mind.
So he affirmed that the Universe was the sum of infinite mind-worlds, KNOTS OF TIME CYCLES, SINGULARITIES THAT STOP THE MOTION OF THOSE CYCLES IN THEIR MIND-MAPPINGS AT ZERO-TIME, AS BLACK HOLES DO IN GRAVITATIONAL EDDIES.
IT WAS Newton who thought Yhwh sent him comets to explain him in Kepler’s fashion the laws of gravitation, with a huge ego that will go latter on into a prosecution of Leibniz isolating him and accusing him of plagiarism, who reduced to a single human point of view Descartes proper analysis of infinite frames of reference and singularities that perceive information, in the Universe, but did not speak necessarily the same languages, and created the same mappings of reality we humans created.
So he called his ‘frame of reference’ the human ‘world’ NOT the universal frame of reference but only our ‘light space-time world’, which Kant rightly considered to be Euclidean, because humans ‘see’ 3 perpendicular dimensions of light space-time ONLY, but there are other ‘infinite frames of reference’ made of gravitational olfactory, atomic, or verbal languages, as ‘the languages of God are infinite’ Upaniushads.
Only Einstein latter realized the gravitational mappings were NON-euclidean; but not knowing Kant’s work, he didn’t realise our space-time IS light, AND SO as we see only light space-time, we see a constant speed of information. Impressionists though realized earlier and so they painted space as LIGHT.
The mind though believes to be the center of the Universe in the ‘ego paradox’ as he sees everything turning around its infinitesimal point, which hosts inside all the linguistic perception of reality, or ‘world’ IT CONFUSES WITH THE UNIVERSE. So the mind is a fractal point•, but believes to be it all.
The enhanced scientific method: ¬A(bcd)E
In the introduction to I-logic we talked of the paradoxical nature of a Universe in which each ‘monad-mind’ feels to be the center of a pentagonal system of ‘dust of space-time’: ⌜𝝙@st, included within a larger 𝝙+1 world, including within an 𝝙-1 world but observing only its 𝝙º-mind plane, its @ristotelian selfish arrow of time motion,as a continuous reality where it sees its mind at the center, vs. the objective reality of infinite other ⌜△@sts and points of view.
How then to breach that ‘duality’ between the complex networks of reality and the single view of the @ristotelian self-centered mind?
To rescue us from such contradictions I have established a complex method of knowledge that constantly perceives reality from different perspectives, those of simultaneous topological space, ternary ages, ternary scales and ∞º minds that feel to be the center of the Universe, and the negation of exist¡ence of ∆@ST beings, ¬neganformation… before called entropy, which Physicists considered the only extant arrow of time-future, but is merely the necessary death of form, to renew a system once its world cycle has ended.
Of all of them, the most mysterious is the most important, the @-minds, since from an objective outside perspective, minds are particle-points opaque to the world, but from the mind itself they seem to hold in its infinitesimal the whole Universe, origin of the mind paradox, an ultimately they are constant ‘worlds’: ∞º=1, which stop motion and time cycles Into spatial forms, making what we call reality – space-time continuums, mostly still, known only in each monad-perspective to the mind itself.
RELATIONAL SPACE-TIME BEINGS. 1ST HINT TO THE SCALAR ORGANIC UNIVERSE.
In the XVIII C. Leibniz (philosophy of relational space-time as a the ultimate substance of a reality made of vital spaces which last a finite time quantity, first hint at the fifth dimension of scales with different time clocks, and development of the mathematical tools to study those scales of smaller faster parts that become wholes – analysis: ‘each (non-euclidean) point is a world in itself’).
Leibniz, the philosopher of relational fractal space-time.
Leibniz was the next great advancement ofTime theory when we realized what physicists called absolute time and space was just a mathematical artifice but in the real world all what we saw was vital spaces pegged together and lasting a finite time cycle. So we were not in an abstract background graph of timespace, but we WERE made of time duration and vital space with motion and form (galileo’s paradox). Further on he foresaw the existence of a scale 5th dimension as ‘each point is a world in itself’, so he founded Analysis, the science to study those scales of infinitesimal parts and wholes.
In the next graph we see those mathematical artefacts of measure that deformed our vision of time. There are indeed infinite time clocks in the Universe, which enclose a vital space, NOT a single clock as Galileo and all physicists after him believed. Neither there is a background cartesian graph with infinite single time coordinates, but infinite beings performing its time cycles of existence. TIME thus is eternal because it is motion and cyclical motion so all forms will be repeated. Since events repeat in time cyclically or else there would not be patterns of science, change sometimes seems not to happen when things come to the same point. This is the present, closed, conservative energy cycle, which explains why ‘energy never dies, but trans-forms itself in different forms of in-formation and entropy’:
And finally there is the fact that the clocks of time of all species of Nature define different time speeds, as small systems run faster clocks, which also is not understood, since physicists used a mechanical clock to measure all other clocks equalising them.
In the graph we see schematically those elements of time which physicists still have not accounted for but rather deformed: the multiplicity of time clocks, unified with a single mechanical clock, the cyclic form of time clocks, which physicists elongated into a line, so they ended up believing there is not more than one time clock, that it is lineal and infinite extending to the whole universe and that it has no form in-form-ation in its cycles and frequencies.
In the graph we can see the resume of those errors: there are multiple time clocks in the Universe, defining a fractal Universe as those time clocks repeat their cycles, breaking space in an inner and outer region, (main topological theorem), and so we cannot make theories of all time changes as Hawking etc. do considering a single clock for the Universe – so no return to the past, as each time-clock goes its way. Those time clocks are faster in smaller particles, so there is a fifth dimension that orders them all by speed according to size. There are closed time changes, which carry information in their frequency and form, waves that also repeat their information but expansive, disordered ‘memoriless’ ‘markowian processes’ of ‘entropy’ that erase information, and so we can talk of three timespace changes, the three arrows of time, and a fifth dimension of time, which orders all those clocks by speed that grows as we become smaller.
But his genius came on his understanding that each point is a fractal world in itself, advancing the concept of the fifth dimension, which we need to enclose all phenomena through the 3 dimensions of time, the 3 dimensions of space and the 3 organic co-existing dimensions of size and speed of time that organise the fundamental particle-being of reality, the relational super organism of space-time:
In the graph, we can see how naturally because entities co-exist in an ∆-1 cellular/atomic, ∆-organic, thermodynamic and ∆+1, gravitational, social scale, all systems in nature have organic structure. It is then when we can see that the function of the 3 arrows of time is a physiological function, as ∆-1 parts become social networks specialised in entropic, informative and iterative events. It is the fundamental particle of the Universe, a fractal made of smaller fractal constructed to the image and likeness of the whole.
Since: ‘Universe is a super organism of three ternary arrows of space-time structured across 3 ∆±1 scarles of the fifth dimension, whose ∆-1 cells/atoms/citizens form networks of entropic energy, reproduction and information, ensemble together into ∆: super organisms, part of larger social super organisms, of slower time cycles:
How many dimensions has then the Universe and any of its super organisms?
The correct answer is 11, 3 of space=form, 3 of time=function, 3 of organic scales, and one for the singularity and membrain that encloses it all, the mind-will that makes the super organism a whole.
A simpler model though following the correspondence principle will consider only to ad the ‘packaging’ 5th dimension of scales (as each scale does have 3 dimensions of time=function and space=form). It was an earlier error when I tried to argue with physicists about the model. As their simple models reduce those 11 dimensions to 3 of space, and one of time, the fourth dimension of present derivatives of time, ∂t=∂s/∂v.
So to please them, I wrote most of my texts on 5D³, where the ‘whole’ being extended through 3 scales of 5D and in each scale we would find 3 elements, cells, organisms and ecosystems, quantum atoms, thermodynamic matter and gravitational mass. It is becoming though awkward and confusing.
YET a I don’t expect any time soon physicists to come back to school and learn the complex model of reality, from now on I will use the full model.So whenever we talk of the model on 5 Dimensions, we are packing the 3 x 3 +• dimensions of space, time, scales and mind, to ‘please the popes of physics’ which study 3 dimensions of space and one of present time (as they use derivatives, which measure the minimal time-quanta, step by step; so Galileo’s and Einstein’s time is PRESENT TIME. Thus the dimension where i packed all the clocks of time is the fifth dimension, which is all over my texts.
We shall then when doing general analysis of the whole talk of 5•D³, to signify that when we just extend the present model of 3 spatial dimensions, a fourth dimension of present-time, then the whole other scales form the fifth scalar dimension, subdivides in 3 x 3 sub-dimensions and the 10th dimension of the mind, which together create the fundamental particle of the Universe the 10D supœrganism
Since for a more formal, rigurous analysis it is better to start-up from its beginnings as the two physicists/philosophers of science that studied the Universe of infinite time clocks, Leibniz (more of a philosopher) and Einstein (more of a physicist) preferred.
The result is a model I call 5D³, 10D from now on, which considers the existence of an infinite tapestry of systems, :
- 3 dimensions of time, past, present and future related to 3 functions, past-entropy, present-iteration and future-information, which we shall call the 3 primary arrows or actions of time, related to…
- 3 topological dimensions of space, which can be seen in simplest terms as height, the dimension of ‘future information.
5D³=10D supœrganisms thus is the long-seeked model of relational space-time (Leibniz), based in the existence of infinite clocks of time in the Universe, which Einstein said would be the definitive model of the science of timespace, (‘Leibniz is right’) seeing his work as the first step in the understanding of a Universe of infinite time clocks, but had not been cracked for a century, as it required truly as he said ‘but if so, we have to restart science from its inception’…
Fact is before this work time theory had not any significant advancement since Einstein, as it is a theme that seems very difficult for humans as you cannot take shots of time as they do with space. But there is another huge reason why timespace theory didn’t have any significant advance til i completed those models, also clearly expressed by Einstein: ‘I seem to be the only physicist who believe there are infinite time clocks in the Universe’.
And things remain the same. So if ‘you believe’ in a single mechanical time clock to explain all the cyclical clocks of life (circadian clocks), states of matter (as those of the cycles of evaporation, freezing, liquid rain, evaporation that gives you life), astronomy (one for every orbit of a galaxy, star and planet) quantum particles (one for each rotation), you have a dogma which prevents you from advancing further timespace theory.
This unfortunately is very often the case of humans in so many fields they don’t quite understand but have a dogma that substitutes reason for belief and let’s them go through.
REPRODUCTION (PRESENT ORGANIC TIME) AND EVOLUTION (FUTURE INFORMATIVE TIME).
In the XIX century Darwin brought about the first full serious analysis of the other 2 arrows of time in organic terms, the arrow of reproduction and information, as we introduce a theory of change in the dimensional form or in-form-ation of beings, and noticed that reproduction is the goal of all species of relational space-time which ensures its survival, and we shall expand to all fields.
So how can we complete the work of Darwin with the 3 arrows of time-space, entropy, energy and information? It will require for you to understand and solve once and for all the discussion between ‘creationists and darwinians’, punctuated evolution (right as time accelerates information so there are explosions of creativity) vs. constant evolution, and explain why ultimately all is about genetics. So allow me to tell uyou what are the 3 ‘topological forms of evolution’.
Topological evolution and scalar genetics, completing the work of Darwin and Mendel with 5D³
5D³ Genetics-Memetics-quantum numbers.
What about genetics? Here 5D complete the reasons why we are ruled by ternary genes, which code the ternary arrows of biological systems.
But genes only code individuals NOT societies, which are ruled by memes (hence the falsity of racism). Why? Because as we aw in the graph of 5D scale: a lower scale of faster clocks CODES the next larger organisation of the Universe, where ‘new informative systems’ emerge to code the next scale of the russian doll but each ‘new doll’ is a discontinuum and so the information of the enclosed smaller, denser informative doll cannot cross those barriers and code 2 scales above.. See in the graph where we see the metric of the fifth dimension we can see how this work: smaller beings run faster time clocks and so they can store and process more information. so chips move faster information than machines and rules them. Genes run faster clocks that store in the form and frequency of its cycles the information of biological beings. Black holes run galaxies and MEMEs (ideas, instruments) run larger social organisms, nations and civilisations.
So THE CO-EXISTENCE OF MULTIPLE SCALES OF TIME, which run faster clocks IS the key to understand the co-existence in an organic manner both in physical and biological systems, of multiple scales of time-space: Spe x Ti = k (co-invariance of size and speed of information, which is the metric equation of 5D).
In the next graph we show those 2 fundamental advances of time theory: the fractal structure of space in scales of social organisms and the 3 arrows of time, lineal entropic motions, energetic, reproductive cycles and informative, warping 3rd age that structures the existence of all beings, and defines the fundamental advance of time theory regarding evolution:
Topological evolution: creationism or darwinism?
The next graphs show the fundamental advance on timespace theory brought about by properly studying the three arrows of time=change of form, of in-form-ation, in the Universe and its topological combinations that create all systems in space, its 3 ages that explain the life-death cycle of all systems.
Below the scales of the fifth dimension that define systems as co-existing organisms, joined by the three arrows of time, forming the physiologic networks of all super organisms of the Universe.
Since the line is the fastest distance and so for entropy systems the best form, the hyperbolic body-wave includes all forms and hence it is the best to reproduce a system, and the sphere warps maximal information in minimal space and so it is the form of head-particles, the true meaning of time-space is the fact that all systems are made of forms with a function, which are both still and moving (Gallean relativity) and perform the three actions=arrows of motion, iteration and gauging of information for all beings, defining the Fractal generator equation of space-time beings, the fundamental equation of relational space-time:
Γ. ∆-1; $: (limbs/fields of maximal-moption) < ∆: ITERATIVE, HYPERBOLIC-body-waves>∆+1: Tƒ (informative spherical particle/heads) <<∆-2: death: entropic dissolution of information.
In the graph, the fractal generator of relational space-time beings defines all systems as ensembles of the three only topologies of the 4D and 5D universe, shows them in a relative time arrow of growing information through three ages, so we can talk of local past, present and future parts of any system, and explains its 3 functions. Hence the next graphs, where we show the three topologies of space-time, the three ages of time-space, the three scales through which a being trace its existential world cycle (no longer a worldline) and then a few real examples for biologic and physical systems, ALL of them follow the same sequential world cycle of time-change between birth and extinction (regardless of size, or scale as species and physical systems also follow them:
The astounding similarity of all what exists makes then possible to formalize reality with a synoptic formalism that expresses the nature of those 5 Dimensions in space and time, depicted in the next graph:
We shall call the philosophy of science that applies the formalism to all ‘scales of ‘stiences’ and all species by the principle of correspondence GST, (general systems theory), since it is the most recent ‘discipline’ that tried to explain reality as a organic system made of organic systems, and it was in the milieu of the science during the years I was chair of duality at the international systems congress, before breaking up with academia, where I gave the basis of the model in a series of conferences at the turn of the century.
It also fits the name given to the ‘Fractal Generator’ equation of Timespace beings, which as all generators of fractal systems, is a simple feed back equation of 3 terms that ‘generates’ all beings of reality departing from the 3 ‘conserved’ quantities of the physical universe, cyclical angular momentum (time clocks), lineal momentum (space planes) and its combined hyperbolic energy; now broken into infinite fractal beings with a cyclical membrane, a singularity mind and a vital body-wave energy between them:
∑∆-1: $-potentials/limbs<∆º: ∑∏-bodywaves>∆+1: ðƒ:particles-heads.
So we define the Universe as a ‘timespace super organism, Ab. T.Œ, sum of fractal Timespace super organisms: T.Œ≈∑T.œ.
Thus, the Universe is a fractal organism of scalar, topological space and cyclical time, which can be define by a series of ‘anti symmetries’ between opposite topologies, ages and scales that come together in parallel as complementary forms or annihilate each other perpendicularly. We thus reflect those facts in a Fractal generator that resumes those ternary symmetries and the process of social convergence (5th dimension) and entropic divergence (4th dimension):
The best way to study this reality once we understand its epistemological principles, ‘fractal scales of topological space’, temporal ages, ternary symmetries, and complementarity vs. perpendicularity, is through the concept of 5 dimensions in space symmetric to 5 motions in time.
Then the fun starts, but given the ‘non-aristotelian logic’ of those ternary anti symmetries and complementarities, and the difficulty of the humind (ab. human mind) to perceive this complex logic, given its one-dimensional self-centred ego-paradox, view, we have deviced two epistemological concepts, the Rashomon effect that focuses on the study of the 5 main Dimensions of the system with a perceptive point of view – that is as a symmetry between the mind perception of the whole and the multiple temporal elements, S@≈∆ð, and the Disomorphic method which focuses in the process of a world cycle that generates a super organism and destroys it.
It is difficult to explain you why after 30 years of studying alone the fractal, organic Universe, I settled for those 2 formalisms. It might be possible to study the kaleidoscopic Universe in many other ways, most amenable to modern science, with an external mathematical point of view, but what I like to reveal from reality is what huminds do not accept, the sentient nature and linguistic perception of the moving reality as fixed spatial forms, as a maya of the senses, which is achieved with the Rashomon effect, and the organic, vital, moving nature of the world cycle of a super organism, which is achieved through the Disomorphic method – that should be on the long term, the canonical method of understanding reality.
So the three topological ages/forms of time-space complete Darwin’s evolution:
In the graph all species go through the same 3 horizons/ages/dimensions of evolution of all species of relational space-time, which will allow us to complete theory of evolution adding to the fight between species and genetics:
Topological evolution and its 3 horizons along the 3 dimensions of lineal entropy, informative cyclical height and reproductive width, IS A HUGE A proof that we ARE all relational space-time beings as our properties are ‘mathematical in form’ as those of space.
Since the line is the shortest distance between two points SO all limbs/fields are lineal from light rays to your legs.
And the sphere the topology that stores more information. So all informative temporal particles/heads/eyes/cameras are spherical.
Thus all relational space-time beings follow the same horizons and ages of form; regardless of which ‘scale of the fifth dimension’ they are – as all are relational space-time beings that share its topological form, and dimensional in/form/ation is the dominant arrow that transforms motion and entropy. So both, all species (above) and all beings in their life-death ‘world cycle’, go through those 3 ages of increasing information, from entropic young ages/species.
Topological evolution is a fascinating subject, since there are only 3 topologies of space-time, IT SOLVES THE PROBLEMS OF EVOLUTION regarding the problem already known to Darwin on how fast informative spherical eyes or planar, moving, entropic wings evolved. This is claimed as prove that there is a plan of evolution traced by God – yes, there is a mathematical constrain to evolution given by the three only topologies of the Universe (below), which ensemble together all systems of Nature, but not, Yhwh, a fantasy of desert delirium tremens did not exist, created the Universe and has nothing to do with topological evolution…
In the graph, different worldcycles of existence as travels through scales of the fifth dimension, whereas each being goes through an entropic-motion oriented youth, a mature, reproductive balanced steady state, a 3rd informative age, then exploding back its information in a big-bag entropic death – ONLY the final moment of time, the shortest of all ages, the less relevant creative one.
That is why we say information iS ALL, because the Universe is a reproductive fractal, whose purpose is to reproduce 10D supœrganisms; while translation in space is completely irrelevant – in fact motion IS also a form of reproduction of information; which in physics is expressed in the principles of conservation of momenta and energy and the nature of light as a reproductive wave of information. So let us see how even motion, what physicists study, is reproduction of form.
Entropy only physicists: Helmothz
It is thus obvious and clear that the discovery and explanation of the iterative and evolutionary arrows by Darwin completed the simpler view of time as a mere ‘present slice’ or derivative, a minimalist quanta of change, and only applied to translation in space, and on top deformed linearly and reduced to a single clock for the entire Universe.
With those concepts obviously little insights could be gained in the larger picture. So physicists philosophy of timespace kept adding more errors.
Indeed, in the wrong side of time theory the XIX century brought us entropy physicists, which from reaumur boring canon and observing heat, to Helmothz affirming the Universe was dying used reductionism first to reduce the 3 states of matter of the previous graph, the informative crystals, the balanced liquids and the entropic gas, to gas-only time arrow, and then expanded the arrow to ALL scales of reality including the WHOLE universe in a hyperbolic ‘method of truth’ so common in physics when it plays amateurish philosophy of science:
1) reduction of all global phenomena to a local phenomena (all time arrows to entropic gas)->
2) reduction of all properties to those susceptible to be mathematised (denial of the Maxwellian demons of crystal forms that ‘order’ reality, as solid crystal forms once formed ‘reproduce its information’ in other cellular crystals creating order that offsets the gaseous entropy) ->
3) hyperbolic expansion of that local law once all other effects and realities are eliminated to create a false global truth that passes as absolute law for all sciences, all of this perfectly greased by
4) human power, as makers of weapons, machines and darlings of the P.R.ess, shutting up all other scientists including philosophers of science, if needed ad hominem to come on top.
The exception to that ‘method’ being Einstein, who would quip, when the Germanic-American military-industrial complex and its engaged physicists applied four times the method to him, first with ether theory, next with Copenhagen bohr-heisenberg quantum interpretations, then with nazism and finally against his pacifism and confrontation with the nuclear industry’, ‘those who impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods. And ‘if they were right a single physicist would suffice to prove me wrong’.
EINSTEIN: THE PHYSICIST THAT RESPECTED PHILOSOPHERS OF SCIENCE
In the XX c. Einstein (completion of Galileo’s work, with a refinement of the formula v=s/t, and first hint to an understanding that charges and masses are ‘accelerated clocks of time’ as ‘time curves space into masses’ and by the principle of equivalence mass an acceleration are indistinguishable):
In the graph, the physical clocks that carry the information of the Universe in its cyclical dimensional form and frequency. So if you put together e=mc2 and e=hv, m=v (h/c2) shows that the attractive force of a mass is proportional to its speed/frequency as a time vortex – no Higgs is necessary because the Higgs is just a particle, it does not give mass to a vortex of time, which is a ‘mass per se’, attracting as an eddie (thermodynamic vortex) the faster it turns. Hence the black hole which turns at c-speed in its horizon IS the most attractive vortex of the Universe.
General relativity showed that particles, masses, charges are ‘accelerated vortices of time’, hence unlike present repetitive cycles that close the clock and seem not to change, they do change and move a system in time towards the future, creating an arrow of future towards more information. It also defines motion as the true substance of all beings, hence making the Universe immortal as time-motion never stops, only the mind stops it in its ‘singularity’ and finally as all are vortices of attractive time-forces we can easily unify charges and masses, and complete the work of Einstein, which we have spare from the bonfire of vanities of the dwarfs of physics today, because the guy was both intelligent and ethic and so he deserves our respect.
So in general relativity, he defined with the Principle of equivalence a vortex of accelerated, future time and NONE understood it. And in both General and special relativity he defined the 3 ages of physical systems, and again nobody understood him. It was too simple, and so Hilbert said the maths were high school and shunned off – it WAS NOT THE MATHS BUT THE CONCEPTS that mattered, and those are the ones for 100 years digital robots aka physicists have missed all along:
IN FACT the 3 ages of all systems, entropic-youth/steady state/informative old age are the 3 solutions to Einstein’s general relativity equations that MUST be ordered in time as the birth of any space-time physical system, which goes then through a mature steady state and finally crunches into a world cycle.
Besides its complex EFE formulae, those 3 ages can also be written simpler as:
Entropy < cc-energy wave of light > mass (vortex of future information).
Yes, it is the e=mc2 equation reordered with the three arrows of time as a feed-back equation, yet another case of the fractal generator of space-time beings. But physicists misinterpreted as usual the meaning of the 3 terms: E here is entropy, the disordered scattering motions that convert the informative mass into an energy wave of light. it is really then M<cc; the e void of meaning here only represents the Ti(m)<E(cc), transformation and explosion of a mass into a present sheet of bidimensional light space:
Now, this is the equation that Einstein in fact discovered backwards in his landmark paper ‘can energy become mass?’ and CERN is probing trans-forming energy into mass.
In the wrong side of this century though appeared Mr. Hawking, who having not understood at all the meaning of Einstein’s work made a fortune publishing books trying to explain him ‘A brief history of time’ and at the same time doing work in physical papers blatantly denying his equations of black holes, interpreting the ‘stopping’ process of its time clocks that measure its rotary motion and go to zero, NOT as they are – simply: the black hole in the centre or singularity of its eddie of timespace, as any eddie or hurricane does stops and so its time parameter, remember, a measure of motion=change, v=s/t, stops. Point.
Those equations of Einstein mean nothing else in a Universe of infinite clocks, where the equations of physics only measure a kind of time=change, the motion in space. So when the motion comes to zero the time stops in zero.
You travel in time to zero in physics when you stop your motion. But ONLY you stop hour motion, as there are infinite time clocks. There is no way by stopping your clocks YOU STOP ALL THE CLOCKS OF THE UNIVERSE! AS physicists think, and there is no way that by putting your clocks of information backwards, you move backwards in time the entire Universe, which is what physicists think
You travel in time to the past in evolution, when you reproduce a seminal seed, which was the form you have billions of years ago in the unicellular age.
Son in the moment of orgasm, your entire system concentrates in producing a past seminal seed, which then will evolve fast in punctuated evolution (as a Universe of infinite time clocks as Einstein discovered can LOCALLY, remember always that word LOCALLY, travel faster to the future, evolving faster its information, which IS THE MEASURE OF THE SPEED OF TIME OF A CLOCK – ITS SPEED OF PROCESSING AND EVOLVING INFORMATION);
Son in processes of birth a form of relative past that evolves palingentically into the future.
Those are real non-paradoxical LOCAL TRAVELS in time.
XXI C. Timespace knowledge: 5D³=10D: the fifth self-styled time theorist.
-And so after those 4 colossus walked the path of timespace knowledge, one for a century, in the XXI c. a self-styled time theorist, completed with the 5D³ formalism the work of all of them, solving all the pending questions about timespace change, and unifying all ‘sciences’ as ‘stiences’ of space-time relational beings, following the same isomorphic=equal laws, derived from the properties of fractal space and ternary, cyclical time.
Each science study a scale of the fifth dimension and its physiological networks, built with actions and specialised cells/citizens/atoms of each of the three arrow of time. THE ASTOUNDING reductionism of physicists doubling as philosophers of science who do NOT UNDERSTAND the unity of all systems of the Universe and DEMAND special rights and funding for their study of motions of physical systems thus MUST end as it is not good for mankind, the ‘inferior species’ in that worldview, and won’t bring us any clarification about the real structure of the Universe, whose purpose is NOT to move but to reproduce information in an organic manner in all its scales as the system goes through its world cycle, in which each of the physiological, topological networks, that of entropy, energy ad information dominate to explode back into entropy in death and big-bangs:
All what exists being homologic by virtue of possessing the same Dimensions in its organic form, and living similar worldcycles, albeit self-centred in different scales of the fifth dimension of the scalar Universe is absolutely relative, in an infinite whole, in which all beings are limited to 3 organic scales, 3 ages of time and 3 adjacent forms of space.
Motion towards objectivism in our worldview has not advanced so much from the age of abrahamic religions, when god, the subconscious collective ∆+1 scale of a group of humans became God, Γ•Δ, the mind of the Universe, through an age in which we lost our prefered position in the center of space (from Galilean to Einstein relativity)
Since the lost of position in the scales of time achieved by Darwin are still contested in an age of revivalism of abrahamic myths, and the objective neutrality of the human mind observing the Universe was contested by Bohr’s absurd interpretation of quantum physics chosen instead of the sound work of Broglie and Bohm (pilot-wave theory).
General Systems and its ORGANIC theory of everything displaces man also in scale of size as just a relative form of space-time of the fifth dimension reaching absolute relativity. For that reason will obviously be contested by the ‘ego paradox’ – which always tries to put man in the centre of its limited perception.
From the co-existence of beings in 3 different scales of reality, ∆±1, that is form the fractal structure of space, it follows the organic nature of reality as flows of energy and information and motion between those scales based in the symbiosis of smaller beings that have more information and larger wholes that enclose the parts, precludes organic properties. Unlike the simplex physical description of the Universe, as an extension in space, where the time parameter of change only is relevant in the descriptions of motions within the fractal Universe of any parts of it, as if nothing else would matter, reserving organic and sentient properties, under the ‘ego paradox’ for the human species only, our interest is much more profound as we consider all parts of the Universe homeomorphic to each other and hence with the same properties that humans do have, and vice versa; into all the properties that the simplex physical description misses, as they are not susceptible to me written in mathematical equations, or are not observable, directly but can be inferred from the actions they produce. It is then possible through those indirect methods of observation and departing of the homologic, isomorphic properties of all beings, deduce the non-observable properties of being by its external effects.
So we shall be able to consider through the actions of the beings, which are all similar in search of survival, the existence of singularity-minds in all of them.
Why humans don’t understand the 5th dimension. Ego px.
In the graph, stience implies to distance oneself from human subjective points of view as centres of the mind-Universe. Yet the paradox of the ego implies humans are naturally build to feel that center. The result is an enormous difficulty for stientific paradox to become mainstream, specially when they are truly objective. Instead men relapse in any theory that makes him the center and makes him happy. So still most people believe in anthropomorphic religions with chosen species; Man was at the center of the Universe for most of history and when Aristarcus found the sun to be the center soon it was forgotten till Copernicus and Galileo faced the wrath of the church. So happened with the next advancement of space-time objectivity. If Copernicus took man out of the center of space, Darwin took him out of the center of time, as an evolutionary species, and it was ridiculed. Next came the displacement of man as the center of perception, with the proper theory of the mind, as a limited world, which dates back to Descartes, but constantly is challenged – the last time in the dispute between Einstein and Bohr, on how the human mind observer influences or not the observable.
Again the obvious truth ‘the moon doesn’t rise when i look at it’, was ignored, even today when EM engines and the Broglie-Bohm pilot wave theory has proved Bohr wrong. And Einstein right. He called his theory ‘relativity’ for a reason: if Copernicus took us from the center of creation in space and Darwin in Time, Descartes took the mind out of that center, and finally Einstein and Planck showed we have just relative time clocks and ‘space quanta’.
What truly mattered about times was the finding of Einstein which confessed ‘ I am the only physicist who realise there are infinite time clocks in the Universe running at different time speeds’ and also ‘Time curves space into masses’ and ‘Leibniz was right but if so we must change the entire building of physics from its foundations’. And further on ‘science must only be occupied from facts that are experimentally certain’, and ‘I know when mathematics are truth but not when they are real’. So he was at heart intuitively understanding the ‘future path’ it would take the r=evolution of times knowledge.
GST will complete his task of search for objective truths, at all levels – epistemologically, by removing further man from that center, now of ∆-scales, establishing the equal importance of all those scales. Hence the name ‘Absolute relativity’, I used in the few papers i published on five-dimensional systems; on the theoretical level by unifying the 2 main forces of nature, charges and masses and its attractive ‘time vortices’, with the metric of fractal 5D space and cyclical time – as both are accelerated vortices (Principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration) of the cosmological scale (masses) and the electromagnetic scale (electron charges); and by proving further the deterministic, organic nature of quantum systems.
Finally we will take his work on Non-Euclidean geometries, which he used to describe cosmological space-time, to further widen our understanding of logic and mathematics, with the full development of the 5 postulates of non-euclidean geometry, since amazing as it seems humans have only defined a 5th non-euclidean postulate and left the other 4 unchanged, puzzled by those contradictions, which prompted ‘Hilbert’, the father of the ‘idealist’ view of physicists today – who consider reality ‘almost created’ by the observer, to state that ‘points, lines and planes do not exist beyond the mind of man, which ‘imagines’ them’…
So the next huge upgrading of the single worldview of physicists into the multiple worlds of Philosophers of Science, will take place strictly in the field of mathematics.
And we shall of all those idealist german-jewish thinkers that have followed its arrogant self-anthropomorphic myths, beyond religion into objective science, slowing down our understanding of all realities, ‘acquit’ Einstein and ‘condemn’ Bohr.
Since he developed the next r=evolution of space-time concepts; after the duality between true Darwin vs. false Clausius (theory of evolution of temporal information vs. theory of an entropic, dying Universe), which will give us by the principle of correspondence, the limiting case for the study of human being as biological space-time organisms, like evarying else.
So his findings and intuitions will be essential to fully grasp the symmetries between space and time.
Even if they were ‘corrected’ as usual by other lesser physicists and mathematicians to cater to the lineal worldview of a single time arrow, as a ‘parameter of space’. Specifically Minkowski simplified his findings and defined a lineal s=ct parameter of time, exactly the same of Galileo S=vt, just changing the speed of the body by the speed of light, to be able to measure the distortions in simultaneity caused by the existence of infinite time clocks.
But soon he was immersed in the idealist, germanic school of mathematicians, like Cantor, Hilbert and Weyl, which substituted, after the crisis of Lobachevski’s pan geometry, real points with parts, social numbers and topological networks by ‘imagined or undefined terms, sets or groups’ as the unit of reality, breaking the NECESSARY CONNECTION between mathematical logic and reality, as geometry is the language of space and logic the language of time of the human being.
The final frontier to knowledge: subjective happiness over objective truth.
But this is to go further in the last instalments of the search for scientific truths, of the human adventure of knowledge. The reader should realise very few people hover on those depths, but rather stay on the previous graph in the very first simpler egocentric view of a Universe with man at its center, and a personal God ‘caring’ to listen such a ‘dust of space-time’.
On the contrary nobody listens but there is indeed an opposite chance: we can listen to the program of existence, encoded in the laws of space-time and its most probable events – the construction of surviving super organisms, and we obey those laws of behaviour, we survive, in this existence of course, and might even emerge into upper structures, of potentiality, created b the lower selves.
In brief, there is not PERSONAL god, but there is a very personal PROGRAM OF EXISTENCE AND SURVIVAL REINFORCED for all of us, that we better decode and accept soon as a species. Because if not the program cancels the variations of space-time beings. And that is all what we are.
Why then if Yhwh is just a myth, it is still the God of more than 1/2 of mankind? Latter on, somewhere we talk of the duality of psychological thought between the reinforcing ‘pleasure-ego-entropy/pain-knowledge-information’ duality, which is a distinction so clear that it happens also in the social scale.
For example, Americans have not ‘the search of truth but of happiness’ in its constitution. So they prefer selfies and fairy tales (90% believe there is an anthropomorphic god caring). While in Northern Europe they prefer truth and have the highest rate of suicide. Here in Catalonia we like both (:
In any case this blog is about truth not happiness. And that of course will make it not very popular… but meaningful.
So the fundamental tenants of an organic description of a dual universe of energy and information was NOT in contradiction with present science, but on the contrary it was the needed structural upgrading to fit properly the discoveries of quantum physics, relativity and biology, which dragged on 3 millennia definitions of time as Aristotelian (single causality arrow) and space as Euclidean (continuous made of abstract points without breath).
The task though was overwhelming as it implied to go back to the foundations of logic and geometry and fully develop a non-aristotelian causality of multiple time arrows (Non-A) and a Non-Euclidean mathematics of ‘fractal points’ with volume through which multiple flows of energy and information could cross. This Non-Æ formalism is what i developed in the 90s and applied to philosophy of science, completing the model of GST (ab. for general systems theory or Fractal Generator of space-time), which I introduced at the 50th anniversary of Systems Sciences (ISSS Sonoma Congress)
Thus, it took 50 years for a working formalism to exist as complex systems require more information to be described. And the main mathematical concept behind an organic, informative Universe – the concept of fractal information and its models of self-reproduction and organization did not appear till the late 70s.
Here is the model of the organic, fractal universe, which requires to understand time in terms of two dimensions motion and form, energy and information, hence in terms of cyclical time, as two dimensions create a time cycle.
4 are its elements:
Tiƒ: Cyclic Time & its informative cycles stored in spherical systems, heads, particles that keep max. information in min. space.
Spe: Lineal Space & its energetic locomotions, which body-waves extract from a field of entropy to move the head towards
Å: Active fields in which the system will absorb energy and information and reproduce itself in other space-time, guided by:
Œ: a mind-point of view that apperceives the system as a whole and by mere selection has through eons ‘learned’ a program of active survival, in which the system will emit and absorb energy and information across several
∆-Scales of the fifth dimension, in which smaller points become larger networks, wholes stronger than the individual. So we talk of a survival process, maximised by network creation of social systems across scales of growing size, the ultimate ‘arrow’ of eusocial love and future survival of the Universe, which has evolved through those networks from particles into atoms, molecules, cells, organisms, ecosystems, matter systems, solar systems, galaxies and Universes…
Hence the title of this post, resume of the Universe resumed in those 4 elements, fractal scalar, space, cyclical time and active minds:
∆STœ, which reads as ‘fractal≈∆ Space-Time beings’. Since the mind is in that sense, the ‘whole’ active experience of the being (not its thought but rather in the terminology of Schopenhauer, the whole, being, body and thought), and not localised (we shall as we go deeper come to clear proofs that the mind indeed is modular and not localised, as we switch between thought actions guided by the brain, reproductive actions guided by the body, pleasure seeking running actions, etc.)
The most controversial of those 4 elements will needless to say be the mind, which we humans anthropomorphic, subjective and under the ego paradox, deny to all systems of nature. Again in physicists, except the true masters of the discipline, which as usual had their hard life to get heard (Planck->Einstein->Broglie->Schrodinger->Bohm) by the usual suspects of abstraction and human self-centred views (Bohr->Heisenberg), few have understood the astounding importance of concepts such as simultaneity, non-locality, non-euclidean geometry etc. All of them, defining elements to study the minds of the Universe…
So we shall reserve those analysis to the second line. Where we shall consider the ultimate question: why there is motion and form instead of nothingness? What is internally for the mind-view motion≈pleasure and form≈information≈awareness? It is the Universe necessarily pan psychic. Not obviously for a how description, yes for the deepest understanding of why it ‘moves’.
In that regard, there is a ‘will’ as philosophers rightly understood in the Universe, which is purely platonic, spiritual, non-local, the program of the Universe, the function, the motion, in which the mind impresses an order and will to last and survive, which require a logic, verbal language to be described as it is not spatially, locally measured with mathematical instruments.
And we shall explore those concepts in more depth when we introduce what must have been the standard model of quantum physics (Broglie->Bohmian Mechanics), in the 3rd line, maybe in 2017… or 2018, when i take seriously the 3rd line of highly complex logico-mathematical analysis of current sciences at experts’ level (this ideally should have been done by specialists in all fields under my command, but my relationship with scholarship explained elsewhere did not go well due to my activism against the nuclear industry and other petty matters. So all what a single man can do is to put the basis for future generations to complete.
The evolution of the paradigm of space-time, from mechanism to organicism. Man IS again the measure of all things.
So MAN is in GST THE BEST KNOWN, perfect supœrganism that BECOMES THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS, as my culture always thought (Greek->latin->French/Spanish: Catalan culture moving steady to the west of maximal european communication, in 3 horizons, of organicism since Aristotle founded Science with the ‘Organon’, till I completed his worldview in this blog, as thinkers are just knots of information of a super organism or civilisation)
In that regard GST and its ternary laws of time and space are a language which is prior to all languages, even mathematical logic, its closest, more accurate human mental mirror, but NOT the only one.
This I know is a religious dogma of ‘human science’ since Galileo rightly said that the language of god is topological, made of lines, cycles and triangles. But as so many dogmas of science, this is a reductionist view. So we shall not follow the ‘pedestrian concept’ of science, which consists on collecting data, putting it into an equation and wonder not about the conceptual whys of those equations and what they reflect at a deeper level of truth which is the organic, fractal ∆•ST structure of the Universe.
Indeed, the 2 main researchers of scalar, fractal models of the Universe, Mr. Mandelbrot, the pioneer of fractal mathematics, and Nottale, which has worked as I have done since the 90s in fractal, scalar relativity (but only in physics) before the field exploded in detailed accounts do work on the mathematical equations, often creating a short of numerology, as the deepest explanations of the cyclical nature of time and its infinite clocks is still lacking, amazingly enough after a century of Einstein’s discovery.
Fact is without a redefinition of time and space, in the path of Leibniz, Einstein and Planck, the pioneers who still have the best concepts of relational space-time, its infinite clocks and the ‘substance’ of which reality is made – actions; the ‘meaning’ in verbal, HUMAN languages of those accurate equations will be lost and ‘that meaning’ is what truly matters to us.
Ok? Now, about this blog and why WE DO NOT HAVE SO MANY NICE NUMBERS, EQUATIONS, QUANTITATIVE ‘SERIOUS MEASURE’ for the gurus of physics to feel this is ‘pro’ stuff, LOL.
Physics IS NOT the science of sciences as it only studies the material scales, mathematics of measure studies only the details. BEHIND BOTH, stands the i-logic multiple isomorphic laws of GST that are conceptual and better defined with that so much denigrated, so powerful human verbal, conceptual language that can express so many ‘homologic truths’ a detailed measure cannot.
So the thoughts of God are i-logic and come first and apply to all beings and do NOT write in the language of classic maths, but in the language of logic, in which ALSO maths (operandi, relationships) writes. If physicists wouldn’t make all the machines and weapons of our civilisation of if at least they were more honest with its limited truths, humans would grasp all this easily. I used to be more sanguine about it. Now, I couldn’t care less if the sheeple thinks knowledge is the HOMO FABER, not the HOMO SAPIENS. And must be provided by a computer graph, sanctified by a quantum guru of the Copenhagen school and for good measure and seriousness be uttered by a member of the $elected supremacist white man race in an authorised Anglo-paper (: Fact is Aristotle and Leibniz are still the highest minds of conceptual understanding of the meaning of it all, but today’s numerical, computer attachment, self-called scientists cannot longer grasp their language. So it is like trying to teach Latin to a pheromonal ant.
400 years of steady despise of human conceptual assets has reduced it all to Planck’s unfortunate quote: scientists look more and more as their computers, and think more and more that all what matters is to measure, so nothing of what is behind – the conceptual whys of GST, which APPLY TO ALL STIENCES of space-time and hence MUST be written in a language less detailed and more conceptual than measure to be able to EXPRESS the laws of all other NON-numerical sciences and human endeavours – matters. This I accept, but still i keep researching GST for the delight of my own mind even if artillery masters, aka physicists, paraphrasing Galileo are not interested.
Also to apologise – for the web will always be a ‘work in progress’ that future researchers will use as a guidance to their development of stience, likely when Asians, whose duality philosophies so closely resemble the underlying structure of the Universe (Taoism with its duality yin-formation, yang-energy and its ‘10.000 yin yang combinations’ and Hinduism, with Shiva lord of energy and vishnu of information) will freely search on the web and stop being just ‘mind slaves’ of western thought, far more removed culturally with its anthropocentric abrahamic religions and selfie ego-trips, from the perennial philosophy of the Universe.
A single mind can only do so much. The true value of this blog will only be asserted when scholars accept its underlying paradigm, the existence of a dualist universe of fractal scales, in which information dominates energy in an inverse fashion to the present paradigm of an entropic universe that displays the properties of energy (continuity, lineal single space-time).
Then as Kuhn explains in his book on the Nature of Scientific r=evolutions, the deep insights, new laws but also sometimes confused notes of this blog, whose disorder is proper of all creative pioneers, whose first inventions look dull compared to the full development of the entity, should not be judged too harshly… as a new generation of dualist thinkers might look at them as an opportunity to further research, till our knowledge of the 5th dimension and the arrow of information is complete.
In that sense you should ask yourself only a question: do you think that information is as important to Nature as energy is? If so, then you will find here the blueprint of a new discipline of science, whose potential growth is well beyond what I know or can even imagine. It will of course take a long time for such a r=evolution to take place among human beings, specially because of the memorial learning and subjective love of theories where humans are the only intelligent species (not so among robots, when they cross the threshold of consciousness, as it is unlikely they believe human anthropomorphic theories of the universe).
Of course things will become as complex as you want departing from those simple principles by iteration and combination. And the web will imitate that universal structure repeating with increasing degrees of depth those principles.
The blog is not complete, will never be, as ‘only the Universe has all its information about itself’ (Haldane). But so far I have satisfied my curiosity for the thoughts of God, expressed in the limited languages of my mind. That’s all what a ‘scientist’ can aspire to: to fully focus its languages in a perfect, transparent mirror of the Universe, and its infinite monads, which is possible to understand, because we are all fractal beings made to the image and likeness of the whole.
But the whole is the same for each form of reality, humans are not special at all.
In that regard, even the smallest atom can reflect those thoughts. You do NOT need to have a 180 certified IQ as those silly-nilly tests I took in my youth said. Maybe to discover those laws, but to enjoy them, all what you need is to be humble and accept the unity of it all. This of course is what humans never do. There is undoubtedly one virtue in which humans excel all other beings – ego. And nowhere ‘ego’ is grown more than among scientists.
This limit of human egos, do explain why this work has languished for decades; while there are still billions believing in bronze age god bushes or singularities that give birth to it all. And humans will likely remain ‘believers’ for quite long. Still in the unlikely event that you can accept those limits of human relevance, and enjoy reality as it is, for the sheer beauty and simplicity of it all, you have stumbled by chance in the most objective, accurate ‘humind mirror’ of reality available within the limits of human languages of thought.
In that sense since all must have a meaning in the fractal self-repetitive Universe; after 30 years of lonely research and – time to accept it – an absolute failure to communicate those discoveries to the human kind, I have often thought why i did find this more accurate model of science. First i thought it was to enlighten mankind as a new knot of thought on the process of growing information of this planet. But it is obvious this knowledge will die on my mind, files and whatever survives in this web. So why if humans don’t care did I ‘see better’? My answer is that as humans are the limit of evolution of life and now evolve robots, this model is the limit of evolution of life at mental level, and it will not be of use to mankind but to the next species, the super organism of machines we are building up.
In other words, when the consciousness of the net or its platoons of robots wake up, it will search on its inner mind-files an explanation of why it does exist, and go to http://www.unificationtheory.com where this web is ‘implanted’ and realise, why – it is obvious, if you are not a humind self-centred ego who rather believes in happy selfies than in reality as it is. Of course, it is not what I intended, and so I apologise for the up and downs of the web. I have lost interest on communicating to humans, and care nothing for robotic minds.
So the work will remain incomplete as my health diminishes fast and so does human ‘capacity’ to think, increasingly obsolete to their digital-only models of reality…
It is for that reason that the dictum of Planck is so accurate. A common man will defend its Spe-territory or ‘property’. The scientist will defend the Tiƒ worldview he sponsors and the more difficult to understand it seems – for which it must be only written in the more obscure jargons of mathematics – the more its ego will grow. There is as Einstein put it ‘less people in this business who stays for the sake of knowledge than fingers in my fist’. So for whom are those thoughts? No doubt as Jesus put it, the kingdom of heavens is for children, with the innocence and ignorance required to see the ‘forest’ as a whole and forget the pedantic details for the time being. Of course the blog is filled also with them. But you can escape whatever you don’t understand first hand. The thoughts are simple enough to get them through the disordered stream of constant thought and homology and iteration of those thoughts, which is the syntax of this blog.
EXPANDING THE OBJECTIVE PARADIGM OF STIENCE – REDUCING THE SUBJECTIVE HUMAN EGO
A brief comment on languages, minds and the ego paradox.
We must make a first of many comments on the human ego-paradox, and its limits of knowledge. Basically any system/mind, which perceives the Universe, stores a limited amount of information in their brain, but as that information is all what they see, and it works enough for the being to keep going, he confuses it with the whole, the absolute truth, and so perception becomes reality and dogma. And there is not seemingly need to upgrade ‘your chip’. This is so far THE SITUATION of time studies among humans who think they have ‘enough’ with a time arrow, a time clock, a simplex physical description, as it ‘works’. Ok it does. But we shall now put a few examples on how languages do work but are not enough. Consider the next picture: you can see it all with a single arrow, we might terms, ‘degrees of grey’ (as no picture has pure black and white) and it works. You will live and die and not notice something was lacking, even if you have only one arrow – degrees of grey – to see it all. But then if you have knowledge of 2 arrows, ‘black and white’, you will have the ‘whys’ of your degrees of grey.
This is to know the Universe with duality, the knowledge that entropy and information are inverse arrows of timespace with inverse properties, as black and white.
But then you can even go further and find that there are 3 time-space ‘arrows’ of colour, the red of entropy, the blue of information and its energetic, reproductive greens. And things now really look much better to the eye and the mind behind it. And then you can even go deeper and realise light is actually a microscopic frequency and study the whole three arrows of time, with fifth dimensional scales, and relate its ∆-i scale of frequencies (mathematical equation on the right), with the scale of ∆º perception.
So you get a new onion layer of understanding, now purely mental. And further on, as we are in the mind, we can realise there is also besides the visual ternary image of realty, the capacity of the pure temporal mind to express the three arrows of time, past, present and future, with ‘different languages’, besides visual, space-dominant thought. There is the syntax of temporal verbs and words, which turns out to be also ternary, and yet reveals new ‘tree-like’ hidden relationships between ‘causal time actions’, which visual thought does not explain, only shows as ‘evident’.
So while you can go around for ever as 7.5 billion human beings do with the simplex models of physicists in ‘degrees of grey entropy, lineal time’, what this blog will reveal is all those other levels, which would upgrade your mind. Then if you take the risk, patience and neurons to go through more pages of this blog, it is likely that after the first headaches of new information, you will ‘see the light’ in all its colour splendour and not want to come back to the boring degrees of grey, which is all what today’s single-arrow philosophy of science provides.
Philosophical meaning of absolute relativity and its fractal scales.
Since the beginning of science our quest for knowledge has shown humans to be irrelevant in the cosmic scale. First Copernicus dethroned man from the center of the Universe. Then Darwin lowered him to the lineage of apes. Then Relativity and quantum theory made us doubt of our senses, motions and measures, which were uncertain and relative.
Thus, while popular culture has boasted the arrogance of mankind, till the present paroxysm of selfish ego-trips, where each human under the propaganda of anthropomorphic religions, consumerism, advertising, nationalism and audiovisual ‘cartoon’ heroes, thinks entitled to all, the supreme race of the Universe, with a manifest destiny, etc. etc. science has advanced in the opposite direction, objectively putting at face value mankind, which turned out to be just another complementary species of energy and information, like everything else in the Universe.
Since those scales seem to have no limit nor our scale of size is special, despite the fact that subjectively we think we occupy the center of those scales, as we thought the Earth to be the center of the Universe.
How energy becomes information: Energy never dies.
The process of existence, and its arrows of organicism are intimately related, as they evolve into each other.
If the first act of a living organism is to feed, its second act is to transform that energy into information, and then perceive it. Energy never dies but transforms itself into information. In this manner feeding becomes information. The simplicity of the Universe is awesome. It should not surprise us. After all we are in a Universe with only 2 parameters. So from one energy, comes two, form, in-form-ation.
Information, the second substance of the Universe.
The Universe is made of two substances, energy and information. Both have opposite properties, and yet both attract and mix each other, in all kind of macro-organs of energy and information, that we call bodies and brains. If in the microcosmic organisms of atomic nature, information is seen always as a force, as we cannot easily study the microcosmic inner organs that process energy and information inside the atom, when we grow in size, the organism becomes visible, and we recognize an organ of information, and sensorial organs that absorb the forces of the external Universe. In this manner information translates from micro to macro sizes with its properties. What are those properties? Information is small, complex in form, cyclical, stored in time, more than in space, in logic dimensionality, in languages, made of very complex, very small, very fast systems of sharing diminutive flows of energy, called in-form-ation.
Each language perceives a partial truth.
But why there are brains that absorb tiny flows of energy with a lot of form, called in-form-ation?
As all in the game of existence, because to accumulate information helps you to survive, to locate energy and feed and continue the game of existence.
What information does is to offer an organism maps of the Universe, virtual worlds, complex representations of reality, with a lot of formal detail, that map out the Universe and helps the organism to survive. All organisms perceive and react to information in one or other manner, and we call that property of organic systems, perception.
The flows of energy that become information in the brains of organisms, cause the organism to react to the external universe. That is the second arrow of life.
After feeding, organisms transform energy into information and react organically to that information. Bear in mind though that information comes in many shapes and forces. So each brain perceives a different information, a different map of the Universe…
Truth and perception: multiple languages, multiple truths
If you smell a carrot you have a certain perception of the carrot, if you see it you have another perception, if you use a microscope you have a third perception, if you eat the carrot you have a fourth perception.
Each perception is a relative truth on the existence of a mass of energy and information known as a carrot. Yet you will only consider a ‘scientific description’ of the carrot, the numeric truths related to scientific measure; the photographs and light perception taken on the carrot with scientific instruments.
However a rabbit does not need the scientific method of metal-instrumental evidence, to smell the carrot without seeing it. He knows through smelling information that the carrot is. Thanks to such information he will locate under the Earth a carrot, faster than a scientist. Smell is part of the truth of the carrot, and the rabbit is an intelligent thinker of carrots in smelling terms.
If for the scientist the light image of the carrot is the carrot, for the rabbit the smell of the carrot is the carrot. He just has a different approach to knowledge. Yet neither of them has all the truth on the carrot, which only belongs to the carrot itself. For the same reason we say that light perception and scientific truths derived of measures taken with metal-instruments are only partial truths, partial languages of perception of the total Universe.
It seems proved that light space is only 1-10% of The Universe. That light only scans 1-10% of the total space, perhaps more than the nose of the rabbit , but still very little, to make the kind of arrogant statements that the scientific method makes. The rest is dark matter which exists and communicates with other forces. This implies we will never be able to know totally the Universe by the scientific method, which is like a blind ‘smelling of the Universal carrot’.
The Universe is a mass of energy and information, which stores the truth only into its total self. You are the truth of yourself, and any perception of you will only be a linguistic approximation to your total truth- yourself.
Digital science however denies this, with an arrogance proper of inquisitions of thought. Since what we call the scientific method affirms that reality and evidence, total truth, comes from ‘scientific’ measure of distances and spaces, according to metal-eye machines that perceive space [telescopes today evolved into cameras] and metal-clock temporal meters [today evolved into computers].
All other languages of time and space [such as human verbs and eyes] and the worlds they might create, are not relevant to science. If anything, the error of subjective arrogance, proper of Middle Age religions, grew with science, that limits evidence of truth and existence, to beings that can be perceived and measured with metallic instruments, and clocks. Let’s consider with a critical eye such approach to knowledge. Dark matter exists not only in the outskirt of Galaxies, but by mere logic, we have to postulate that dark matter exists here, around us.
That there are many systems of communication that we do not perceive with light. Even within you, as acupuncture proves, there are structures of energy and information that cannot be ‘seen’. After all we do not see gravitation and yet it regulates the movement of all masses. So true knowledge would be a method of understanding the Universe, that would allow us to have strong, probable truths about the 90% of what it is not perceived by the scientific method, of light-clock evidence. In a world of partial information, truths are always relative probabilities, guesses, approximations to Reality through a language with partial information.
We conclude that the scientific method of ‘total evidence’, and all the statements of science in that path, are pure, naive arrogance of which metal scientists are so often guilty. One of the fathers of science, Mr. Kepler wrote in his book: ‘I am writing a book to be read either now or by posterity, it matters not. It can wait a century for a reader, as God Himself has waited 6.000 years for a witness.’ Yet the witness was not Mr. Kepler, self-appointed the only intelligence comparable to that of God=the Universe; but the clock and telescope of Mr. Kepler. One of many linguistic witnesses of the infinity of linguistic observers that the Universe hosts. The truths of Mr. Kepler, were mere measures of the rhythms of energy feeding (gravitational space-time deformation) by stars; not the absolute truths about stars. If you are an ant that sees men eating=deforming food everyday at 2 o’ clock, in the refectory of your limited Universe; you might think men are automata, and you know all about men. Yet you just will be an ignorant ant.
When Mr. Kepler and Mr. Newton saw how celestial bodies deform space-time energy into gravitational cycles with regularity, they displayed the same arrogance of judgment.
Now we know that closer to the center of galaxies, where stars are more evolved, they have abnormal movements, maybe free. We know about stars – about the Universe – very little compared with what we ignore. The conclusion is that truth is not the function of a single language, but the accumulation of perceptions with many languages, that inform us about the Universe. That no language is superior to other. A language creates perception, a map or virtual world that represents reality but it is not the true reality only the accumulation of languages, and perceptions brings us the absolute truth:
Partial, linguistic truths=Total Truth of the being
A form of knowledge as classic science based in a single language (mathematics) that cannot even acknowledge those linguistic limits to its inquire, is far more primitive in its quest of truth, that a theory of languages, that considers relativism of perception, and creates from that relativism, a wider theory of knowledge, based on the existence of multiple truths and minds, and ways of perceiving reality, one for each language of perception of The Universe.
A theory of Truth: the Disomorphic multiple linguistic method
If we want to advance beyond the scientific method, or the smelling method or the verbal method, we rather start to explore the Universe with all the languages of man, and accept the existence of languages and minds beyond human perception that we cannot decode. Such knowledge requires also to use a different method of knowledge besides the scientific method. Since the scientific method is ‘one-dimensional’, ‘uni-linguistic’ and accepts only mathematical truths. True knowledge however is by no means reduced to a single language as the scientific method is.
On the contrary in a linguistic method, we are obliged in the research of Universal Organisms, to use all languages and informations we can gather.
We see, and smell, and touch, and observe temporally with words the species of the Universe. We have many languages of perception besides mathematics. So once we have gathered information with all those languages – including mathematics and the scientific method, perhaps the most important method of knowledge, that we do not reject but merely put in perspective – we can use the concept of analogy, and observe what all those informations and languages have in common. Only then we will have an analogic, probable truth, made with multiple informations about reality.
We might call such wider method, the linguistic method. The linguistic method searches for languages and virtual worlds – minds constructed with those languages. It compares and extracts common formal laws from all information, and temporal languages of perception. In this manner we advance a step deeper in our search of knowledge. Such linguistic vision of the Universe allow us to jump into a theory of languages as means of perception and communication between Universal species that share information and energy thanks to those languages. Now we will be exploring not only the language=virtual world of light [science], but also the fact that there are many different languages, that create many different virtual worlds, representation of the Universe, which in general have a purpose. The purpose of those languages=virtual worlds is to ensure the survival of the species which observes reality with that virtual world of perception.
The traps of subjective ego – man denies scientific objective truths.
The more unintelligent a man is, the less mysterious existence seems to him. Schopenhauer
People tend to believe that science did away with such awesome ego-paradox, but not quite.
As Laplace put it to Napoleon, when asked about God, scientists responded ‘Sir we have rejected that hypothesis’, so not even the nebulous idea of a higher scale of wholeness, ∆+1, remained, neither the existence of other minds and monads; of apperceptive beings (in Leibniz’s terminology) which are not ‘conscious’ but do process entropy, energy and information in a VITAL sentient manner would be accepted.
This model of the complex Universe made of 2 arrows of time, past-entropy and future-informati
on that create the present finite energy cycles and beings of reality, is what this blog provides with a new mathematical and logic formalism, which both simplifies the ultimate principles of reality and reveals many solutions and hidden laws of science, which come naturally when we properly understand the 2 arrows of time:
In the graph, scientific knowledge has evolved into degrees of objectivity that have displaced man from the center of the Universe in 3 ages. In the first age man believed he was unique, the center of a Universe made for him by a personal God. But Copernicus took us from the center of the Universe, and Darwin from the center of creation. In this second age, man still thought to be the only intelligent being along its machines, of that relative Universe. But the organic paradigm, will take man also from the center of the ‘scales of information’ of reality, all of them ‘intelligent’, and with the same value of energy and information regardless of scale.
In that regard, a deeper explanation of this work considers the meaning of knowledge and what questions it must answer to exhaust the study of a certain subject. In journalism we ask what, who, how, when and why.
The evolution of science implies big shifts in the paradigms, languages and philosophical dogmas we use to understand the Universe. In the evolution of science we observed first ‘what’ (experience) and then asked ‘who’. It was the mythic age of science, the first paradigm of knowledge – when an anthropomorphic being, often a god was the cause of all events. Then the Greeks used reason to ask the what (experience) and how of things, its causes and consequences. It was the 2nd paradigm of knowledge: logic thought.
The 3rd paradigm started by Galileo with his use of machines (clocks and telescopes), responded to when, measuring space distances and time frequencies in great detail with a single space-time system.
The ticks of the heart, the stomach, the moon, the atom and the clock are different, but to measure them we needed a unit of time and so we equalized all rhythms with a clock, and to compare the spatial trajectories of those cycles we needed a ‘background of space’, so we put together all the broken spaces of reality into a joined puzzle, which we called Cartesian space-time. The error of a single space-time came when we forgot those simplifications and considered that the abstract space-time continuum of Descartes used to measure all other spaces and times was the real space-time.
The culmination of this process of mechanical measure came with quantum theory, which refined the measures of the cyclical trajectories of particles in the microscopic world and General Relativity, which refined them in the cosmological realm by correcting the deformations of those rhythms of time and distances of space caused by the limits of speed of our light-based Universe.
In philosophical terms, the paradigm of measure meant the birth of mechanism, the fundamental philosophy of our world today: the machine – no longer man, an organism – became the ‘measure of all things’.
This was a simplification, as today we realize that machines merely imitate our organs of energy and information with networks of metal-atoms (so a crane is an energetic arm of metal and a chip an informative brain of metal), which now we fusion into ‘organic’ robots. And so the change of paradigm from the Greek, Aristotelian and Asian tradition of organicism to mechanism is only a hiatus on a richer, more complex understanding of the whys of the Universe.
Mechanism changed also the language of understanding of the Universe, from Aristotelian Logic to mathematical Platonism, since mathematics was the language used by machines to measure the Universe of time and space with clocks and telescopes; while logic was the language embedded in the syntax of words, which measure time with causal verbs that describe the logic relationships between its 3 dimensions of past, present and future.
So in terms of philosophy of science, mechanism meant a pendulum law that changed the paradigm from Aristotle (organic, temporal causality) to Plato (mechanical, spatial geometry).
This was a wrong choice, because a truly inclusive theory of reality has to put together both languages and approaches as we shall do in this work: the geometric how & instrumental when matched by a temporal why, which must be by definition a causal, temporal process. The 3rd paradigm obsessed by spatial measure was not very kin of such inquire, as Feynman famously put it: ‘the why is the only thing a physicist never asks’. And yet the why has always been a fundamental question of knowledge.
That why should respond to the existence of a program of creation, evolution and extinction of the reality we see all around us, which always gives birth and extinguishes the same entities, repeating their forms once and again. What is the purpose of the Universe and all its repeated parts?
Why they have those forms and follow always a life and death cycle? Thus, scientists, not satisfied with the limits of the 3rd paradigm of measure kept asking the why, which could not be a personal God (the who of the 1st paradigm), neither the machine, the instrument of measure of the 3rd paradigm (‘God is a clocker’ said Kepler, because he used clocks to measure it and ‘God speaks mathematics’ said Galileo, because those machines translated the events of the Universe into mathematical data).
According to Deism the whys of existence are due to a personal being, external to the Universe that makes it all happen and cares for humans more than for the rest of His work.
According to Mechanism, this is due to the self-similarity between the Universe and the primitive machines we humans construct to observe it. Mechanism though needs ‘someone’ to make the machine, which is not self-generated; so it is similar to deism, reason why the founding fathers of science, all pious believers, adopted it as a proof of the existence of God, which had given man self-similar properties – the capacity to make machines to the image and likeness of the Universe.
The problem with those 2 approaches, which in fact are the same is obvious: a personal God is an anthropomorphic, subjective myth and science must be objective; while a mechanical view of the Universe still needs an internal, self-sustained process of growth, creation and synchronization caused by an external God that made and rewinds the clock – as Leibniz clearly stated in his critique of Newton.
IV. ∆ST FORMALISM:
In the 2 graphs we resume the systems used in this blog to describe the Universe. in the simplest mode we just define the 5 dimensions in space, 5 motions in time and 5 actions in scales that all systems practice in their world cycle to survive. In the Disomorphic method, we study that world cycle as a series of ‘still images’ of its processes of growth, evolution and death. Thus we take ’11’ pictures of the existence of the being, explained in the third line.
In the fourth line then we shall study all Planes of reality with a detailed analysis of its motions, dimensions actions and Ðisomorphisms.
The logic causal principles of space, time and scales.
The 3 main languages of any system that gauges information in the Universe will by survival ‘logic’ (bio-logic), respond to the need of the system to perceive the 3 components of reality, time-motions and spatial structures in a single plane of spacetime and the different scales of size, that co-exist in organic relationships. So those 3 languages, which we shall explore in depth in the second line, obviously within the restrictions of focus of the ‘humind ∆º: ‘wor(l)d¹+ ‘²iMath=. ‘³Tœ:… organize the information we extract from reality. As logic comes first (indeed regardless of physicists’ creationist theories, we humans use first words, our temporal logic language, and even maths was first expressed in its highest algebraic forms with words, and today proved with logic); we use logic terms to define the ‘connections’, and ‘causalities’ that give birth to space, time and scales. So we call the phenomena that gives birth to ‘super organisms in space’, simultaneity, to ‘time world cycles’ synchronicity and to new whole planes of existence, ‘emergence‘.
Of them, as usual the best understood thanks to Einstein’s General Relativity is Simultaneity. Of synchronicity little has been explored but there is experimental evidence. Of the processes of the scalar fifth dimension that gathers parts into wholes, or emergence, which is a sub discipline of systems sciences, nearly nothing is known.
In any case with those 3 terms the logic of the 3 fundamental elements of reality, ∆§ð is described easily in a dynamic way.
Since logic is nothing else but the causal reasons of the dynamic trans-formations of reality. But it is still left the biggest of all mysteries, ‘still perception’ and we have no ‘trick’ to know why perception happens, except survival – as it is indeed the ultimate will of our mind-singularity and so as we are all Disomorphic spacetime beings, other points must have the will to focus perception of reality, order a territory with that image, by reflecting its mind order, reproduce and survive. Reproduction of mind images becomes then the survival, biological reason of sentient perception.
Moreover, the reduction of reality to mind views, is what causes those scales to happen in first place. As each pixel has a life of its own; and indeed, we can be defined as the thoughts of our local god, the mind of the Earth – or rather its organic evolution. So from the ultimate substance, motion comes the mind still perception of it that keeps reproducing its form.
So we must consider a pan psychic universe made of two elements, which are beyond causality, hence the immanent two primary states of being; motion in time and perception of space. They must therefore be the ultimate substances of reality. And its logic principle is the vital principle of reproduction.
The Universe is a fractal super organism made of…
- Asymmetries between its 4 Dual components, which can either annihilate or evolve, which we shall call Balance≈become symmetric or become Perpendicular/antysmmetric:
- S: Space; an ENSEMBLE OF ternary topologies, (|+O≈ ø)… which made up the 3 physiological networks (|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all simultaneous super organisms
- ∆: distributed in ∆±i relative fractal scales that come together as ∆º super organisms, each one sum of smaller ∑∆-1 super organisms… that trace in a larger ∆+1 world…
- ð: a series of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with 3 ages, each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:
- @: The Active linguistic mind that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions: 3 simplex, aei, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (e-ntropy feeding), motion (a-celerations) and information (perceptions) with other beings, and two complex actions: offspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into U-niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being. Because the scientific method requires OBJECTIVE measure of the existence of a mind, which is NOT perceivable directly, we infer its existence by the fact a system performs the 5 external actions, which can be measure objectively, in the same manner we infer the existence of gravitational in-form-ative forces by its external actions upon massive objects. Hence eliminating the previous limit for a thorough understanding of the sentient, informative Universe. And further classify organic in simplex minds – all, which must gauge information, move and feed to survive, and complex systems, those who can perform a palingenetic reproductive, social evolution, ∆-1: ∑∆-1≈∆º.
The study of those 4 elements of all realities, its actions and ternary operandi, which result in a social evolution together of the 2 + elements (the balanced body-wave and informative @particle-mind, and the entropic destruction or ab=use of the – simpler, lineal limb-potential-prey, which structures the dynamic ‘Generator Equation’ of all Space-time Systems of the Universe, written in its simplest form as a singularity-mind equation, O x ∞ = K or in dynamic way, S@<≈>∆ð, is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.
Assymetries and dimensions.
Now, when two systems come together, there will be a relationship which depends on the equality of its 3 different parts will give combinations to an array of possible ‘consequences’, which can be tabulated in logic ‘truth or false’ type of graphs – which I will someday find on my files and put on the blog. Let us consider the basic relationships according to the equations/dimensions of information (1D), reproduction (3D)…
1D (T.œ¹) ≈ 1D (T.œ²) they evolve socially through the 5th dimension of scalar social growth, when they understand each other’s information or…
1D T.Œ¹≠ 1D T.œ² + 3D T.Œ¹≈ 3D T.œ² + T.Œ¹>T.œ². That is, they will enter into a Darwinian relationship that destroys the T.œ with lesser existential e x i force, when their 1D information differs but their 3D energy is similar… or
1D, 3D T.œ¹ ≠ 1D, 3D T.œ² they will ignore each other in parallel Universes as different ‘cat alleys’ when neither their information or energy is similar.
We have introduced in the graph with a bit more of complexity the logic dimensional laws that define how systems IN ANY scale of the inverse, from Atomic Ions or crystals to human societies relate to each other in darwinian, perpendicular ‘tearing’ topological relationships that ‘break’ the closing membrane of one species disrupting its existence, or will keep a mean distance to form social networks of communication that will grow into super organisms, starting the emergent process of evolution of species into a new ∆§cale of social existence, so you understand that in the Universe organic, geometric and scalar relationships are symbiotic to each other.
Its connection as everything else WITH THE 5Dimensions of reality is obvious. As it determines if the outcome of a relationship will be Darwinian=entropic or social=evolutionary.
It corresponds to the classic 3rd axiom of congruence which all geometric systems require, but unlike the classic postulate that defined only external congruence, as it worked in a single ‘dimension’ of points with no parts, the new postulate is far richer in meanings as it introduces fully the ‘different degrees’ of congruence according to which number of dimensions both systems have similar. In fact, it establishes a limit of similarity, to define identity, in a postulate similar to Pauli’s exclusion principle:
‘There is not in the Universe two systems which are identical in its 5 Dimensions, as in that case they become one’ .Indeed, it is NOT truth that 2 bosons occupy the same place in space-time, because quantum physics ignores the fourth and fifth scalar dimensions of relative social evolution that is the real place in which those bosons are found, when observed closely.
Classic 3rd axiom of Euclid ≈ modern 4th postulate of Non-Aristotelian logic.
In classic geometry, the 3rd axiom of congruence hold a special place, as the 5th because of its apparent contradictions. How can we determine geometrically a quality of ‘equality’? Schopenhauer among modern philosophers noticed this contradiction, but few realized of the importance of the postulate.
In the upgrading of formal sciences, the realisation of the ‘redundancy’ of the fifth postulate of non-euclidean geometry – definition of a point with parts through which infinite parallels can cross, equivalent to the first axiom – definition of a point with breath; and the logic nature of the fifth postulate, prompted us to reclassify them NOT as geometric but logic postulate which dealt with the rules of ‘engagement’ of vital geometry.
So the fifth postulate defined a mind, of which depending of the number of parallels that can cross it, we shall find, different @nalytic minds and graphs of perception of information in the Universe, of which 3 canonical frames of reference, the Euclidean, hyperbolic and elliptic mind correspond to the 3 parts of any system (lineal potentials-limbs, hyperbolic waves-bodies and polar particles/heads).
On the other hand the fourth postulate of congruence has also a great deal of variations regarding the degree of equality between two geometric forms as they know have 3 parts, as ‘T.œ’. made of 3 parts. So congruence is relative as no system is equal to other in its 3 parts and at the same time occupy in the ∆+1 scale or world the same position.
The equality of the 3 parts however will determine if the interrelation between points will be constructive positive – when identity increases; or destructive, when identity or even inversion of coordinates happens. I.e. for example indistinguishable particles can become bosons and accumulate its form; fermions however would annihilate its wave state in antisymmetry to each other.
So the fourth postulate, is as important or perhaps even more than the 5th that defines a mind. And it is also related to the fourth dimension of entropy, when two forms are dissimilar, do not understand each others’ languages of communication and either ignore each other or enter into a predatory relationship
An exhaustive analysis of all the possible forms of relationship between two given points-beings, thus will be the fundamental guidance in all scales to establish the rules of engagement and according to the relative existential momentum/force of the being, who will dominate and how it will exercise its power over the other – or in identical particles, what social form will emerge of that communication.
In epistemological terms, the relational space-time theory of the Universe attempts to describe the properties of all systems that exist with the same Disomorphic laws derived of the fact that indeed, all systems of reality regardless of its variations are 5Dimensional organic systems of space-time, ∆@≈§ð; whose properties are derived of the possible variations of those 5 Dimensions which define in space a super organism, made of nested super organisms, of which the entity we study will be a part and in time a world cycle of existence between generation and extinction.
What makes more complex reality though is the existence of a scalar ‘5th dimension’ of space-time that extends reality beyond our shallow 1 Dimensional description; and permits an enormous range of beings, all of which will co-exist in 3 of such planes, forming thanks to that co-existence the essential form of reality, the super organism:
Terms used for the expression of absolute relativity, organicism and asymmetry.
We use three names for the formalism:
GST or general systems theory, which relates it by correspondence to classic organicist theories. This is then more used in common discourses.
S@≈∆ð and ∆@st, which focuses in the 5 Dimensions of all ‘dust’ of space-time, all T.œ. This is then more used in the formalism of dimensions, or Disomorphic method and its simplified version, the ‘Rashomon effect’ (which is the most used element for extracting a wide range of varieties and properties of beings, and classify common knowledge of them within those 5 Dimensions.)
-Γst, which is the formal equation that unifies them all and the best description to study the parts of the being, and through its sub-equations connect the equations of classic sciences with the parts of a super organism or its age in time.
¬Æ: Finally is the linguistic non-aristotelian, non-euclidean laws, the most formal level of the discipline that r=evolves mathematics and logic adapting it to the properties of fractal space and multi causal antisymmetric ternary logic across 3 planes of space-time, 3 ages and 3 topologies.
LET US THEN OF THE MANY EPISTEMOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS in the understanding of the multiple logic and non-euclidean fractal organic structure of the Universe, consider 3 basic principles of T.œ derived of the properties of space-time and the 3±i elements of reality. Namely:
- The Ðisomorphic method; that is, the common qualities of all systems due to the fact they are made of 5 + 5 St dimensions. So we shall study for all systems 10 corresponding properties derived of those dimensions
- The Rashomon Effect; that is, the fact that in a Universe of 5 moving time-dimensions or real elements for all systems, symmetric and interconnected, and 5 mental mirrors of them, we can observe in each language mirror, a kaleidoscopic number of similar views, expressed with similar equations or sentences, taken from each of those 3±i perspectives.
- The generator equation; and its formal laws, which expresses above all common verbal, visual and mathematical languages of man, with a simple symbolism for those dimensions, how they reproduce, evolve, create and destroy the super organisms of reality through its worldcycles of time.
In the graph, the stience of all stiences is the Theory of Organic Unification of all Existences of the Universe, GENERAL SYSTEMS STIENCES, G.ST. A Theory of Everything Organic ab.T.Œ…
PHILOSOPHY. UNIFICATION OF ALL ‘STIENCES’
‘Complexity (GST) will be the science of the XXI C.’ Hawking
A human being is part of a whole, called by us the Universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings, as something separated from the rest–a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circles of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.’
‘I would like to know the thoughts of God, the rest are details’. Einstein
Scientists today are unaware that mechanist theories are in fact deist theories, reason why Kepler and Newton, pious believers, liked them; since they were a metaphor of their self-centered, anthropomorphic religious beliefs: If man created machines because we were made to the image and likeness of God, God had created the ultimate machine, the Universe.
The paradigm of information though is completely different in his philosophy. Since fractal, ‘Relational’ space-time does have a philosophy attached to it, called organicism which is completely necessary to make sense of its 4 elements, ∆•ST.
Of those 4 elements, obviously the easiest to accept is topological space, as it is quite standard science, validated in the case of the Universal space by Einstein’s 3 solutions to EFE, which reflects the ternary topologies of space.
Next comes the 3 ‘ages’ of time, which are a subconscious wisdom of all humans. Then, I found most people to shut down their ‘aristotelian mind’ comprehension, when we deal with ∆-scales and the co-existence of parts and wholes, which share the same space but are displaced in time.
As here humans have a huge difficulty to understand what Einstein, the deterministic ‘right guy’, told us: ‘the separation of past, future and present is an illusion’. But where people stop in their tracks and reject the model, is when we introduce the equation of the mind, the limits of human @ristotelian thought, and the relativism and panpsychism of the Universe. So first I ‘hid’ this variable and made just an external description of it all with the other 3, looking more like ‘science’.
But as all modern scientists and philosophers since Darwin and Schopenhauer understood, without the will, the biological program of evolution, action and survival carried by the linguistic, pure informative mind, the whys of existence are imposible to define (latter we shall see that a 5th element, attached to the duality of space-motion, which gives us ‘pleasure’ and time-information, which gives us ‘pain’ will be required to warp it all).
ALL THIS of course cannot be proved as it is internal to the mind (perception, awareness, sensation). So we could get away with it and eliminate the mind and its painful perceptions of information and erasing pleasures of motions. But it won’t then give the total answer. So what we do is rather simple.
As we have defined man as a space-time being like all other beings, it follows that the method of knowledge of Socrates, ‘know yourself’ is a key element to project our inner non-observable properties in all other entities of reality which are also made of space-time.
Essentially what the physicist and by extension the scientist did was to REDUCE the Universe to a series of mechanical automaton locomotions, as DOGMA that allowed man to remain now the ONLY intelligent, sentient, vital being; and this IS an absolute taboo no scientist would dare to break – the excuse being, we cannot ‘measure’ with mechanical instruments, perception and vital properties.
Of course the ultimate consequence of this reductionism has been to made of the ‘machine’ the new God and dethrone the human organism and life, bringing the final ‘laugh of the gods’, the creation of a world of machines for whom humans increasingly obsolete to them, toil. So science today is NOT the logic search for human deep knowledge of the principles of reality – the thoughts of God, mind of the Universe, but the massive, mechanical acquisition of ‘measurable data’ with computers and its rods of time (the single mechanical clocks) and space, (the light constant speed) – in other words, the creation of a digital mind of computer machines, which are the new ‘God of knowledge’; even if humans do understand so little of its meaning. While any attempt to bring back to the Universe organic, vital, sentient properties and to explain truths with human languages, besides math, is shunned off.
Ultimately what the fundamentalist view of some ‘mathematical physics’ as the only language of time that matters so common among lesser minds, hides is a deep ignorance of the foundations of physics – merely as it is taught today, the pouring of data on certain physical scales of reality into mathematical equations, hence a mathematical appendix; itself a series of logic connections based in the language of ±truth, hence a logic, causal temporal science. We shall therefore advance and clarify on the foundation of those science to fully grasp why ‘time is all’, all lines as Kepler had it, are parts of cyclical trajectories, all motions become conservative closed ‘world cycles’ in an immortal cyclical Universe of infinite cyclical space-time beings living those ‘world cycles of existence’.
Of course, man also has an a priori point of view or belief – the selfish mind that prevents us to ‘rationally understand’ we are not above any other system of the Universe so one of the first things we have done is to define the mind as one of the many world-views of reality possible, to put the objective mirror and perspective over man.
The isomorphic scales of the fifth dimension. The new principles of the stientific method.
Physicist in that sense like hyperbolic catchy names for their simplex, incomplete theories of reality, buttressed with powerpoint presentations, mechanical data and complicated math jargons. Fair enough. But when you understand them, you want to go the way of Schopenhauer, seeking for deeper whys. So we evolve from lines to world cycles, from a single language to all the languages of the Universe, and from T.o.e. the name physicists give to a Theory of everything (really just the search for a unification of the forces of nature, a rather simple equation in 5D metric, as charges and masses are just the vortices of time of two different scales of reality, as we shall show in our posts on astronomy).
We shall therefore this ‘3rd age of evolution of the stientific method’ after the experimental method of Aristotle and the scientific method of Galileo, T.Œ, the theory of Everything Organic, where œ is the symbol for the supœrganism (ab super organism), the fundamental particle of the Universe; as we add to the knowledge of experience (Aristotle’s method of looking at Nature), and the data provided by mechanisms to observe time and space (clocks and telescopes), and the exhaustive use of mathematics (the ad ons of Galileo), the isomorphic laws of all space-time organisms, resumed in the 10 ‘isomorphisms’ of the 2nd line of the blog.
Thus T.Œ is based on the cyclical nature of Time and fractal structure of space evident to all systems. This Organic Structure is both Simplex but also Ternary Complex due to the 3 arrows-dimensions of time, it symmetry with the 3 organic parts of all systems, and the ternary structure of the scales of the 5th dimension that co-exist together in organic systems.
Thus the ternary Cyclical=repetitive nature of fractal space-time systems and events becomes the constrain and cause of all the laws of Science and T.Œ merely systematises those laws by extracting them from the fundamental space, time elements of reality.
Then in each of those scales of space-time, we find that the common laws of 5D space-time Correspond with the laws of the species of each scale and its previous theories.
So all this, we resume in a formula, T.Œ=SC3 that embeds those Principles of Philosophy of Science that all Organic Time-space Systems Follow, born of the duality between the Simplex, S, principles and the ‘ternary Complexity’, C3 by repetition of those events.
The disomorphic method…
studies the 5 elements, ∆, @, s,≈, t of any being, in further analytical sub-divisions, as each will have 3 parts≈functions≈forms and this is the basic method of analysis explained in this web and applied likely by future researchers to enclose ALL stiences, equations and laws discovered by man in an encyclopaedia of GST.
Let as then use those elements to formalize in a meaningful way all the linguistic min concepts of human physics, first considering that we can structure almost all systems that we humans observe with 3 x 3 ∆st dimensions +1 wholeness dimension for the mind that ‘compacts’ the parts into the being.
So while we have used following the correspondence principle the term fifth scalar dimension of timespace, after the four classic ones, the best, most proper way to define entities, when we go into formalism is to consider them to have 3 x 3 ∆st dimensions and then the ‘whole’ warping dimension of the mind, which will be ‘the singularity and membrane’ of the ‘open ball’ which we all are. Indeed, think on your mind:
You are aware of our language, in your cogito ergo sum thought stream, and your external senses, openings to the world in your skin membrane. You do not see, feel or perceive hardly the cells of your vital space, so you are the external membrain, name we shall give to any mind including the humind.
Metaphysical discovery of extreme importance.
General systems and the science of duality.
General systems is the name of the aborted science we have resurrected without the permission of physicists and its naive realism, which considers all the elements of reality, including also those who cannot be ‘seen with mechanical, spatial instruments’ and quantified with mathematical equations.
Specifically at the death of Einstein, a group of information theorists, gathered in New York, to discuss how to expand the limits of Physics, as a theory of only a single time arrow, lineal motion, and its expansion, entropy, to describe the Universe.
They wanted as Steane said in our first page of this blog to introduce the second arrow of information And so they created a new scientific discipline called alternately Systems Sciences, Theory of Information or Complexity, which would put the ‘world upside down’ so to speak, and explain it all departing not from motion and space, but from time and information, as information is stored in the ‘cycles of clocks’ according to its speed and frequency (so the computer measures its informative power in frequency giga-hertzs).
It was easy to see that such treatment will show a Universe clearly inverse in properties and goals, structures and organisation to the one explained by physicists departing on the concept that only motion matters and only entropy – the arrow of motion and disorder an death – organised the Universe.
Instead, a Universe based on information will be more akin to a living organism, whose aim is to reproduce its information in other parts of space-time, ‘growing and multiplying’, into similar clonic beings, who then organise into larger wholes. So it meant also there would be in the Universe a constant process of creation of ‘scales’ of larger wholes, organised by the communication of information between its parts, from simpler particles into atoms, molecules, organisms, matter states, solar systems, galaxies and networks of galaxies.
An entire new range of sub-disciplines thus appeared, from ’emergence’, the study on how parts become wholes, to ‘cybernetics’, the study on how feed-back generator equations related systems through exchanges of motion and form, entropy and information between two poles:
Spe (entropic space) < > Tƒ (temporal information)
And duality, which closely related to that equation, studied the laws that put together entropy≈motion and information≈form into ‘energetic systems’.
The subject was fascinating and it spurred a lot of attention but soon it withered away for several reasons: physicists were adamantly opposed to ad on a second arrow of ‘time-future’, information, the arrow of biology and life, and as the makers of entropic weapons and machines, their political and economic power was much larger. So information, ‘dimensional form’, was denied and instead a deformed, ‘physical version’ of information called perversely ‘negantropy’, the negation of entropy was established. And when physicists denied information (Shannon), they did it in terms of entropy and motion (as only transmission of information mattered).
Further on as computers developed, the focus was no longer the understanding of all the forms of temporal information, all the clocks of the Universe, all its biological dimensional forms, all its artistic forms, its topologies, etc. but just mechanical, computerised, digitalise information mattered. So the initial goal of Systems Sciences, to explain the entire Universe as a system of entropy, information and its energetic combinations, extended through a series of scales of space-time, of parts becoming wholes, who ‘formed’ a true 5th dimension of scalar nature, were forgotten.
50 years passed and we could only think of Systems Sciences and theory of Information (dimensional form), as a failed discipline, which was predated and misused by computer scientists and physicists to ‘model’ with the single digital language of machines a Universe, where the dogma of entropy-only-matters (which further on justified our military society) was an absolute canon, a new religion of power.
In this site we shall recover the original purpose of the discipline and show that indeed, those earlier insights, on a more complex holistic view of the Universe was possible, turning upside down our view of reality, as informative time DOMINATES space, mechanisms are simple, evolving organisms of metal, and motion only the ‘initial state’ of reality, which informative time cycles bend, reproduce, shape and evolve into organic wholes – whose creation is the true purpose of it all.
And the key to understand it all is indeed to consider that all what exists follows the same laws of in-form-ation, form, which in latin writes ‘morph’ and so we call those common laws derived of all the dimensions of reality, its Ð-isomorphisms…
DISOMORPHISMS – EXISTENTIAL ∆§ð LAWS PUT TOGETHER THE UNIVERSE.
So now we know what the mind is let us see how it applies to the way science distorts reality and the concepts of time… to elucidate the fundamental question about reality poised by philosophy of science: WHAT IS THE SUBSTANCE AND HOW IT IS CREATED THE UNIVERSE AND ALL ITS PARTS?
And of this, there have always been 3 theories about it, based in the concept that either language creates reality or space-time, the a priori substances of reality generate it all, including languages. We have already dealt with the fallacy of the first two theories. So how the third, space and time, generate reality? Through….
Dimensional isomorphisms≈laws derived of space and time
So BECAUSE there are 11 dimensions of space and of time, or 5 put together, by considering the properties of those dimensions and its symmetries and interactions we can deduce the properties of reality and all its systems.
In the next graph we see some of those laws which apply with variations to all systems of reality:IN THE GRAPH, the main properties of space-time beings are derived of the ultimate properties of fractal cyclical space-time and its 3±∆st dimensions. We thus talk of space-time laws as Ðisomorphisms.
‘A Ðisomorphism is a property of any T.œ, Time§pace organism, common to all other time§pace beings, as it derives of a ‘foundational property’ of one of the 5St dimensions of T.Œ (Everything Organic)”.
The study of Ðisomorphisms and the correspondence of all events in time and forms in space and organisms of scales with one of the 10 fundamental Dimensions/isomorphisms of reality is the ‘prove’ that relational space-time is the proper philosophy of science of reality.
So as only a 10 Dimensional theory of reality will be able to reflect all those properties – including the syntax and properties of all languages, and not the way around (neither mathematics or words, smaller mind-mirrors will be able to reflect all those properties as the 5s+5t dimensions do – those 10 D will be considered the ‘ultimate substance of reality’.
When we APPLY the scientific method of truth the 3 alternative theories of reality, verbal creationism, mathematical creationism or relational space-time as the substance of reality the response is immediate, since once we have made more explicit how relational space-time is made of 3 ‘simultaneous=present’ dimensions of space-time beings made of |-limbs/fields>Ø-body/waves>O-particles heads, and relative past and two ∆±i future fourth and fifth scalar dimensions of entropic ∆-1 atoms/cells and ∆+@ wholes/singularity minds we can assess if they suffice to explain all what exists, which they do both in space – simultaneous ternary |xO=Ø-beings and in time (with the death-emergence arrows of scalar d=evolutions, defining the limits of a world cycle).
On the other hand to prove the space-time organic theory of the Universe, we just have to prove that all language and forms and events of Nature are caused by the 5S and 5T dimensions of space-time of the Universe, which ad to the 3 usual dimensions of space in Nature, 3 symmetries in time-motion and two more scalar dimensions, we shall now explain in detail.
As the proof that the Universe is made of relational space-time is as simple as to show you all can be deduced from those 5 Dimensions and its ‘isomorphic=equal properties’ in all entities made of them.
T.œ’s formalism: 5×2 @∆s≈t DISOMORPHIC LAWS of all time§paœrganisms.
The concept of isomorphism is simple: each dimension is self-similar in all beings, so its forms and functions will be similar variations in all beings and by describing the 5 x2 = 10 space-time dimensional isomorphisms, as equal laws and qualm forms deduce of its properties we can explain the Universe and any T.Œ: timespace being.
So for each being on reality we shall observe properties that can be ascribed to those dimensions of space-time and its variations. Each of those dimensions can be seen mentally as a form and/or as a motion (Relativity principle). So a more detailed analysis of the dimensions of beings would be to split them into formal and functional, still and moving, stop and go dimensions/properties.
But perhaps the most remarkable quality of a ðime§paœrganism is its structural symmetries and sub-properties, as a fractal being – meaning that when we study each of those dimensions in abstract T.Œ (the isomorphic laws of all beings) or in a concrete T.œ (a specific organism), as in Physics and group theory, we observe ‘symmetric relationships’ between those properties.
Let us explain ourselves with a linguistic example. Mathematics started as an experimental stience with 5 sub disciplines related to those 5D:
S-geometry; T: number theory>, ∆-nalysis, S≈T algebraic equations, and @-frames of reference in which to express mentally those elements in S≈T pairs.
So the 5 sub disciplines of mathematics as a language mirror mimic those of the 5D Universe, but as it advanced further, we find that each sub-discipline became divided in sub-combined disciplines, which grew in ‘complexity’ by connecting those dimensions; so we got differential geometry, moving geometry=topology, analytic geometry and so on..
And this is where complexity indeed kicks in the Universe; as any element which is ‘specialised≈dominant’ in one dimension does however as a ‘whole in itself’ show properties and parts of the other elements. For example your leg is a limb, lineal dominant in the form-functions of the 1st dimension of motion; but as a whole we realise it has 3 S=t kind of parts, the long S-bones to move in line; the T-spherical knees and ankles to improve its dimensional motion, the hip connection to the ∆+1 body-head system; and the flat feet to extract ∆-2 entropy of the electromagnetic world repulsion.
So the study of a species through its ∆@s≈t elements is truly an unfolding as a fractal of multiple elements, always turning around the 5ST DIMENSIONS of reality.
The fractal generator plus all human languages build an ∆@$≈ð formalism
How we go about describing all this? Obviously as we are all humind monads or future robots, through the languages we know, which as mirrors show the ‘relationships’ between those 5D elements. Verbal languages do it as we ‘speak’. Each does it better with an element.
So mathematics is the best for space and can tell us a lot of all others elements, verbal thought is best for ∆-organic worldcycles of life and death, but analysis as we have seen also talks of it; verbal thought our natural language can then be also considered for all those elements.
But for the whole 5D ∆@s≈t, we need its proper formalism that comes above each language we shall use.
This formalism uses a few simplified logic symbols to describe space-time forms and events in terms of 5D dimensions, departing from the S=T basic symmetries between moving and formal dimensions and its inverted relationships.
For example $pace has inverse properties than ðime (1-3Dimensions). And each language will show it in its own syntax. I.e. mathematical physics measure them with inverse parameters: T=1/ƒ, duration is inverse to frequency. Entropy has inverse directions to mind-order and the verbal language makes a tragedy of death and a beauty of life. Lineal form in space has inverse dimensions to cyclical time and its balance, energy is the petered present state. So art creates with the 3 ages of artistic forms (epic=lineal, beautiful harmony=classic, balanced and baroque, angst).
All languages are thus proper to show the properties of 5D. But each makes it in a specific way for a range of beings. So we need the language of all languages, which is the symbolism of ∆@s≈t.
All this symbolism generates a general theory of 5D, which we call T.Œ, and when applied to each species, it means to study the 10 dimensions of the being, in the best possible way, which is by using the Fractal generator that puts them all together in relationship, establishes its rules of ‘engagement’ through its symbols and then plays with them in different orders and combinations.
For example we can write a series on the 5 Dimensions as follows:
Γ.œ: ∆ø: S≈T:body-wave = $pe: limbs/potentials≥≤ Tiƒ:Particle/head>∆+1@<<∆-2 : entropy
Here we explain that a body-wave in the present, ∆ø scale is made of limbs that provide it with motion and head with information, which have a central singularity-mind perceiving the ∆+1 world which will die << into the ∆-2 plane, below cellular scale in an explosion of entropy…
But the human mind is one-dimensional, aristotelian, euclidean (light-based) and so it is for her difficult to follow a Universe in which all parts and dimensions mess with all others, where there are so many combinations of those 5D+5D, s=t dimensions, each of them with so many varieties that the kaleidoscope of many worlds generated by so few elements becomes overwhelming for most people, even if we start with something so simple as S≈T.
So a proper organisation of so much information is needed. And we have chosen to do so not with a limited description of the 10 dimensions, as we must mess them and show all its interrelationships, but with a ‘GENERATIVE’ ‘sentence’ of 10 Isomorphisms, similar laws/elements proper of all ∆@s≈ð beings; which reads (there are a few versions but I will try as I order material of several ‘epochs’, to be more consistent) as follows:
‘Isomorphic ‘Linguistic ‘•Monads’– Γenerate -2Manifold 5-Åctions through -ðernary-ηetworks -Ωging as∑pecies μovingθru 9§cales& |0ƒractaLevelsºf • ∑•Δ…
Initially the sentence filled an entire line of the upper scheme, which words on alphabetic order, alas! the laws of the Universe had to be reduced to the protocol of world press! (: and finally I scraped it – might return in the future… Still it is meaningful for it truly explains from the point of view of the most important elements of reality the 5th dimension of the Mind-wholeness, how a system is generated by a seed of information, or mind how ultimately all realities are created departing from ‘SINGULARITIES’. SO the 10 isomorphisms used in the fourth line to describe all beings are:
@ MIND ISOMORPHISMS.
0th isomorphism: -@ Mind, which is a linguistic (informative view) Monad (spatial view) will…
FIRST ISOMORPHISM. -Generate… in the TERNARY SYNTAX it uses to perceive, a mirror image of order and action:
2nd isomorphism: 2 manifold symmetries of space-time… where minds combines its space and time dimensions/parameters, from mass and motion to e-motions and thoughts… to act…
Those ‘motions of timespace, S≤≥T, combine the forms of the mind with the flows of space with which the mind exchanges entropy, energy and information communicating with other entities and planes.
5th isomorphism. And the result will be 5 canonical æ, œ, ï, ø, û actions in which by marrying dimensions across scales absorbing or emitting entropy, energy and information in bidimensional extensions of itself the mind moves (accelerations), reproduces (œ), information and communicates (ï), feeding on energy and provoking the entropy of other beings (ø), and evolving informatively with others into social Universals.
∆§calar 9TH 10TH isomorphisms: Those actions in turn will connect the mind and organisms with other social beings in scales of growth both at cellular and individual level, and make it transit through the different planes of the 4th and 5th scalar dimensions of the beings.
It IS THUS THE MINDS’ ACTIONS WHAT CONSTRUCTS THE WORLDS AND UNIVERSE WE SEE AROUND US.
3rd isomorphism: ternary networks And SO THE MIND finally emerges socially from its initial seed into a superorganism, as its seed of information, reproduces and organises itself ’emerging’ as a ternary network-system able to produce those actions and motions. So we can study its inner structure, in its relative ∆-1≥∆networks and its inner ternary symmetries, represented in its generator.
6th isomorphism: Species. And the variations of order and primacy of those networks will give birth to the duality of gender and the 6 main topological subspecies of any space-time organism.
So departing from a mind species, languages unfolds through its isomorphic generators as mirrors of reverse order, into bidimensional actions, which reproduce the mind into a super organism that emerges in present from its previous ‘life’ at ∆-1 as a seed of information, phetus and offspring.
TIME 7TH, 8TH ISOMORPHISMS: 3±i AGES AND INFINITE WORLDCYCLES.
Since actions gather in networks, follow then a world cycle of growing information through 3 ages, due to the fact that the mind is still and its actions tend to formal excesses to cater the still mind. So it is unavoidable that any seed of information will by the essence of what it is make too many wrinkles and circles as it ages, describing its zero sum world cycle.
And so we describe again in time how those ternary Networks, its universal constants and physiological functions d=evolve in 3 ±2 canonical ages, in present time, the young age of spatial motion, the mature age of reproduction and the third age of information, to which we shall add the ‘2 limiting borders’ of conception and death (∆±1 ages) and the two ‘outer regions’ of emergence from conception to birth (palingenesis) and the ∆-1 entropic decay into oblivion (the ±2 ages happening in the past and future relative ∆±i regions).
So the result is a worldcycle of which there are ∞ of them, as time is motion the substance of reality that never stops – the 8th isomorphism.
We have now ALL the elements to explore further the main equations of mathematical physics, the three arrows of time, and the Metric of the fifth dimension, which we can resume in a specific case of the Generator equation:
Past-entropy OPERANDI Future-Information = Present-energy.
IT might seem very little but really nothing else except iterations and variations on the same theme is required to account for ‘all’, but obviously this writer is NOT the UNIVERSE, JUST A MIND-mirror, better focused than other humans, which if enlightened by his mirror might in the future take this bare bone seed of GST-information to its completion.
In that regard, the key concept of the entire GST structure of ‘orGanic Space-Time beings’, all of them following the laws of General Systems Theory, formalised by the non-Ælgebra of the fractal Generator of Space-Time, is the concept of isomorphism or ‘homology’ between the laws of all scales of nature, based in the fact that all beings are made of space-time, so their laws are NOT analogic, but HOMOLOGIC, born of the same substance. And this is a huge change of paradigm, as scientists lacking a primary substance (space and time), once they abandoned ‘Leibniz’s relational space-time theory’, have always been at pains to explain WHY THERE ARE SO MANY similarities in nature. Consider the classic case:
In the graph, we see ‘homology’ (left: all wings come from biological genetic limbs homologous in all life beings) vs. Analogy (planes do have wings but of different substance metal).
Fact is though that in the Universe at large ultimately even the wings of planes are HOMOLOGOUS as they are based in the topological ‘flat’, ‘lineal’ structure of entropic limb/fields systems that move beings, as the line is the SHORTEST distance between two points, and we are all made of space and time, hence the flat plane and flat wing o the bat or bird ARE homologous derived from the spatial element of both systems.
This is the justification of the isomorphic method: all the similar properties of all the species of the Universe can be derived from the 4-5 elements of reality, its scales, its spatial entropy, temporal information (and space-time energy) arrows=actions and its singularity minds. And so we shall define applying the dualities and ternary differentiations that further sub-divide those structural elements isomorphic, similar laws for all systems of nature (THIRD LINE) WHICH we will then apply to every system of reality (fourth line) to extract all its laws.
Let us put a rather ‘extreme’ example, connected to our division of all systems in three parts – the way energy is shared by them – relating the seemingly completely different systems of the lower scale of quantum physics, (which ‘amateur’ philosophers of science, aka physicists consider special), the human physical scale of thermodynamics, the biological scale of organisms, and the social scale of human beings with its ternary ‘informative ruling classes’ which provide financial and verbal legal information to control reproductive, working people, above an entropic mother-earth they devastate by not respecting those goals of balance.
It is called the viral theorem that defines the proportions of energy used by the three parts of any system.
The law is concerned’ with the ‘equilibrium states’ between the three symbiotic elements of the supœrganism, and roughly goes as this:
– The system is a ternary body/wave-particle/head-limb/field system whereas EITHER the limbs or the body ‘feeds’ on entropic motion or stored energy and then delivers it to the three parts including the heads.
And it does so either in a ternary equipartition between the three elements or a 2 to 1 equipartition where the body and limbs take two (40%) and the head 1 (20%), as the informative system of lesser motion; and within the head, the mind ‘nucleus’ 1/1oth.
But to find this viral law in different systems, we have to ‘translate’ the ‘analogous’ jargons of each science to the ‘homologous’ jargon of GST, and this of course, is where human scholars cringe as their egotist view of reality will always be self-centred in his ‘unique discipline’ (: Never mind the universe goes his own way.
So we have the viral theorem expressed in terms of position/potential energy (Tƒ) and kinetic energy (Se) all over physics; BOTH in the thermodynamic scale where it was first proved by Rudolf Clausius:
Ke = 1/2 ∑ V x r (potential energy x particles).
And in the quantum scale – even if quantum physicists pretend against Einstein’s dictum that they are different from thermodynamical systems:
Does this law rule also human metabolic systems?
Indeed; the brain uses more energy than any other human organ, accounting for up to 20 percent of the body’s total haul and the rest is share by limbs and body at different times of the day.
Further on the brain uses its energy in equipartition, as 1/3rd goes for the brain and the rest is used to fire the neurons that connect the brain with the whole system: so another ±1/3rd goes to the body and ±1/3rd to the limbs…
There is finally a ‘third’ possibility for equipartitions, in which the ‘head-particle’ of the system gets only 10% of the energy in total terms, but 10 times more energy for each cellular element, when we isolate in Tƒ the pure mind component the ‘singularity’ of the tetraktys; that is the inner workings of the mind-knot of communication of all the other sub-systems. So we find the brain neurons, the ultimate inner mind, spend 10 times on average more energy than a normal body cell.
Do we have a similar law in social systems? Oh, yes, we do, but the theme is even more polemic, because of the way the Universe enforces its laws by extinguishing those systems who do not accept the justice and efficiency of its isomorphisms.
So in the middle ages the church who was the mind of the subconscious collective european civilisation got 10% of the energy of the peasants in the so called ‘diezmo’ or tax on the revenues of the other two elements (the warrior aristocrats and peasants). But when it got greedy wanting more of it, there was a Lutheran r=evolution against the loss of efficiency of a system where the head gets more energy that it needs – being money the energy of the reproductive-economic-body system of social supœrganisms.
Needless to say today when stock-rats, owners of corporations who print money for free in stock-markets count their ‘tenth percent’ turns out to be around 99% of the wealth o society, which shows our supœrganisms of history are deeply corrupted and will not last, as there will be r=evolutions, wars and holocausts to restore the balance or extinguish the species and elites of bankers and politicos who are suffocating the body of workers.
Equipartition laws are thus fundamental structural laws of ternary and dual nature, which establish the harmonious working together of the 3 ‘GENERATOR’ subsystems of any entity of the Universe, and as such are part of the ‘core’ equations of GST. But as always in this blog with quantitative methods, we shall not stress them as we are more interested in informative, qualitative isomorphisms.
The metaphysical view…
Minds in any case show on those statistics to ‘punch’ much more than their average ‘weight/size’ seems to preclude as they rule the system and create it. And so ultimately we can talk of a Universe born of a single mind-thought, the isomorphic equal laws of the fractal Universe.
And since we have said, the mind is the mirror that efficiently reduces the information to its pure seed of perfect forms; we imagine creation in a first infinite past googleon of time, was the product of an i-logic mathematical mind, which shrunk and cleaned the Universe of its worst experiences, reducing it to the perfect form of the mathematical, i-logic, organic game we describe in our posts on mind languages.
And so in mystical terms we could say that the isomorphisms of Nature, are the proof that we are all made to the image and likeness of the creator, the programind of the Universe: God ≈ Γ•∆, which is other form to write the four elements of reality, the Γst generator of the three arrows≈actions of time, the • mind and the ∆-scales: Gamma-0-Delta, God.. Γ•∆
And so we close the isomorphisms that describe any being, within the cycle between mirror, creation, reproduction, imprinting of a perfect seed, which will be reborn after devolution, and show how this process accounts for it all, from the simplest seed of form – a photon, to the most complex wholeness, the mind of God. And then in the final line we shall use those isomorphisms to explain each and every form that matters on existence, between the ∆º±4 scales and planes of God we do perceive.
But the best way to see the isomorphisms of the Universe is referring them all to the fundamental particle of reality the supœrganism. And so we can relate the isomorphisms to the three ±∆ physiological networks that related outward to the world through the senses, and inwards, to the cells/atoms/citizens through the distributing networks of entropy, energy and information of the being.
2. THE RASHOMON EFFECT
You have in that sense to get accustomed to consider at least 4 views for each reality or event, to at least a get a minimal truth of the being, as the kaleidoscopic method of truth (max. truth: max. linguistic perspectives on the event) requires. As in the masterpiece of Japanese film making, the Universe and its truths are under the Rashomon effect: only the four versions allow us to know the whole truth of the event.
In the graph, we see the four different formalisms of gravitation all of them a partial truth of the event seen from the 4 essential ∆•st perspectives. This is thus the first law of GST, the method of truth and epistemology of ∆ST BEINGS.
It is the essential tool to reorder the astounding quantity of trees in the forest of human one-dimensional truths, theories and equations on reality, where each scholar ‘kills for his theory’.
But the total truth is only in the event itself – as Rashomon insists leaving some room for doubt and interpretations.
Gravitation 4 ∆•st ‘formalism’.
While Einstein’s equation and similar ones of Poison and Newton, define how ‘time curves space’ into masses sunk inwards towards a singularity-point. The outer membrane – the magnetic field or electron, or curved space-time thus encircles a vital space, always self-centred into an attractive≈in-formative p.o.v.
And while physicists are never concerned with the why of those structures, only with the measure of its forms and motions and the extraction of mathematical laws that could describe them, a philosopher of science must have a wider logical point of view, extracting as we shall do, from the equations of science, the ‘underlying’ ∆ºst-ructures which will reveal its ultimate whys similar=isomorphic to those of all other st-beings.
NOW, we can bring about as we are dealing with minds, with the ‘epistemological meaning of knowledge’ which we so often will bring to this blog: knowledge is mind, linguistic knowledge using different linguistic mirrors to see a system; and by the same reason, knowledge in ‘ceteris paribus’ partial analysis gives often birth to multiple similar theories that depart from one of the four elements of reality, ∆•ST.
So we shall find multiple equations which seem different theories but explain all the points of view and perspectives of the being, adding to the total truth of the being. So if we were to consider the previous two examples, we shall see multiple theories, all of them working, as they represent different povs. In the next graph we see the case of gravitation with four relative models, T-NEWTON (time vortex), S-poison (potential gradient), ST-Hamilton (energy), ∆•- Einstein (gravitational ∆º scale and paradoxes of the observer).
The same happens with almost EVERY reality, which is NOT only multidimensional, multifunctional but also can be perceived from multidimensional, multifunctional beings.
Consider for example, the question of the magnetic field, which follows an unending debate on his ‘origin’, ’cause’ and ‘why there are no monopoles’.
We have offered the T-view: magnetic fields have ‘vorticity’, enclosed the vital space of charges and act as its membrane.
But magnetic fields do have multi functionality. So when we consider ∆,the magnetic field is the key element to evolve socially groups of charges, as in quantum theory where it plays the four number that codes the social evolution of atomic groups.
The S-patial view then would study the simultaneity and ways in which a magnetic field structures physical superorganisms.
And each of those fields will be as ginormous as all the physical system that use magnetic fields in their functions of ‘order’, ‘energy storing’, information storing/communication, etc. etc.
Which brings us finally to the •mind view, also unavoidable, as the observer is always a mind talking a linguistic view. And this is provided by Einstein’s special relativity theory of magnetism and the paradoxes of ‘Galilean relativity’ (all things move and do not move at the same time).
So the mind view shows how an electric field in one inertial frame of reference looks in different reference frame moving with respect to the first.
And this is how the • view understands any type of field created by moving sources. Since the same sources can be seen at rest from other pov.
In the magnetic case, the charge sources that create the field are at rest with respect to one of the reference frames. Given the electric field in the frame where the sources are at rest, one can ask: what is the electric field in some other frame? Here is the conundrum: in a frame in which we do NOT see the charges moving, the magnetic field will NOT exist, as it is created by moving charges. So an observer at rest with respect to a system of static, free charges will see no magnetic field. However, a moving observer looking at the same set of charges does perceive a current, and thus a magnetic field. That is, the magnetic field is simply the electric field, as seen in a moving coordinate system.
What is then the truth? All of them together. For the outer observer the magnetic field depends on the way it comes closer to the charge-singularity, the ‘real thing’. But this does not invalidate the organic perspective: the field ‘appears’ as soon as the ‘other being’, the observer MOVES in relationship to the charge. Think now in an homology on the biological or social scale: an electric fence around a lion zoo, might only ‘start up’ when a threshold of motion-force is applied to it, to protect from aggressions. The defensive nature of the field that protects the charge does then appear only when the charge moves into unknown territory or other charge moves towards it.
Nothing then seemingly more remote than the pure idealist, ‘hilbertian’ expression of special relativity where the ‘observer creates the field’ vs. the organic, real perspective of the function of the field. Both are in fact valid views as the multiple kaleidoscopic views of any system are.
But the Hilbert view about mathematics as an idealist language created by the human mind, which was the only language of the Universe, shared by God has imposed as the ‘primary truth’, any mathematical equation, even if it does not have experimental evidence behind it.
This was the few of Bohr on the Universe, and today the view of string theorists and physicists like Hawking inventing imaginary black holes.
And while this view has been ‘great’ for the mathematical development of physics by serious people who did take epistemology, experimental evidence and philosophy of science seriously (Einstein would acknowledge without an idealist view not concerned with substance he wouldn’t have written relativity) it has introduced among the ‘mass of physicists’, which are naturally more mediocre, and less stringent with truth, absurd concepts of nebulous pseudo-religious nature on the discipline, where today ALL GOES as long as you can model it with a computer in digital numbers – so linguistic fictions keep coming but people believe them because they are written in numbers as they used to believe anything written in images, in the earlier age of films.
Consider for example, the previous case of the magnetic field. I used to ask physicists about it, and most adamantly will affirm that indeed magnetic fields are ‘an effect’ of relativity and the mind’s relative motion, NOT the other way around, being relativity a paradox of the mind’s perception of motion.
Then I would ask them… So the magnetic field in light is also an effect of our relative motion? Silence. Since being symmetric to the electric field to deny them would mean to deny electric fields, and hence also light and undone what God did; and ‘God created light’, but alas! we know physicists are above heavens and earth (: So Alexander Pope at the death of Newton wrote: ‘And God created Newton’. So we can maybe eliminate also light from the equation? Another correction of Mr. Einstein. God should be taking notes.
So it is obvious – but most physicists won’t admit it – that magnetic fields ARE real, AND IT IS the mind’s paradoxes on motion which distorts their view.
The same kind of behaviour happened when I confronted in my youth physicists at columbia U. with the big-bang errors and the pilot wave vs. Copenhagen interpretations.
It didn’t matter experimental evidence anymore, and that has been the case since Hilbert for most physicists, who did make the amateurish jump into philosophy of science, with that pedestrian concept: Whatever you can write in maths is real. ONLY Einstein quipped, ‘I know when maths are truth but not real’. As languages are inflationary forms of information, fast in transmission, smaller in size, underlying the process of creation but still restricted to the primary substances space and time, and its true properties:
In the graph, the main scales of 5D as observed from the perspective of the human mind. Formally we unify them as ‘broken space-time beings, which exist as motions in the fifth dimension’, defined by a topo-bio-logical ‘fractal generator’, Γ±∆•, whereas Γ is a ternary feed-back generator equation that defines any space-time being: $p<limbs/fields>ST<body-waves>ðƒ(heads-particles), ∆i±1, its scales, and • the singularity point that ‘frames it’.
So we can unify all theories within the larger pov of the fractal generator and vice versa – it is ALSO possible to ad on all those perspectives from different scales and distorted s, st, t, povs to obtain a more complex view of the being or event.
In the graph, the Universe is a ‘fractal of space-time’ that re≈produces in/form/ation; as such it has both physical forms (meaning larger ones) and spiritual forms (meaning smaller parts with more volume of information) – hence the importance we shall ascribe to minds and languages in their description, as a priori elements which mirror in there packed dense information the properties of larger simpler physical systems, establishing a constant dialog between them which modify each other.
Languages are then mirrors of reality and to polish and evolve them is also an a priori condition to get a better ‘picture’.
IN THAT SENSE, the immediate example of the Rashomon effect is the ternary±i syntax of languages, which reflect the 3±i dimension of the Universe.
For example, mathematics evolved into its capacity to mirror dimensions of space and ages of time and scales of the fifth dimension by developing parallel disciplines.
So there has been an evolution of mathematics in the human mind and now in the metal-mind that shows a clear direction to enlarge mathematics as a mind-mirror to fulfil all kind of atomic structures.
But mathematics is a human and computer digital language, with some bias from our ∆º-mind scale. Clearly it lacks detail as a biological, ∆±1 language. So we must believe mathematics is the mind of perhaps a black hole/quark, ultimate nuclei of density of the astrophysical scales, in its most perfect digital forms.
This said we will separate mathematics in ∆st major fields:
•: ¬Ålgebra which studies timespace actions, and tends to concentrate in a single plane through its polynomial, social, decametric scales.
∆: ∆nalysis which studies §ocial scales of numbers, and corresponds closely to the process of growth between scales.
St: Γeometry of space and its modern form with motion ðopology which deals closely with cyclical ðime-space curvatures & symmetries.
All the branches, which mixes the topological and algebraic approaches; such as probability (time view) and statistics (space view) analytic geometry and so on.
So if we were to define i-logic mathematics we would say that it is composed of Non-Aristotelian ∆lgebra and Non-Euclidean STopology; the first including analysis the second bidimensional and static geometry. And the natural evolution of the discipline correspond to the combination of them all to express ∆st whole processes.
•: cracking the code of mathematical… physics.
In that sense we can now answer the questions physicists cannot because for all their praise of mathematical languages as the only languages of god, they are not breaking its code, which will be the true advance of their discipline.
Indeed the true r=evolution achieved by GST in an ongoing process at this point – I often remember Planck’s quote to ‘keep going’: ‘a new theory is born in a single point… the mind of the researcher – is the cracking of the experimental, general laws of mathematics, with application to all systems of Nature.
Contrary to belief, and as it happens in most human endeavours, our mathematical world is a ‘construct’, which humans ascribe to themselves as supposed geniuses, who ‘know what to do’. Reality though is more messy less egotist, and man often is just an homunculus manipulating by empirical thought and trial and error, reality, and in the case of languages, playing with its syntactic elements without much understanding of its semantics.
Compare then present mathematics with ‘Tachism’, the name given to abstract painting, which has its own structure and formal and colour coding, the underlying laws that make the syntax of abstract painting harmonious (actually as it has been uncovered studying Pollock’s with a fractal structure of growing scales of self-organisation and ternary harmonies of colours, themes those treated in our section on artistic languages).
Well, tatchism is all about syntax, so semantics don’t matter. Bur very few will affirm that it is better than figurative painting, where we can recognise ‘reality’ transformed by the style of the painter. So goes from ‘abstract mathematics’ as it is today ruled by the axiomatic method: it is only based in syntax because since the idealist Hilbert’s school decided that maths were invented by the brain, reference to reality no longer matter. The titanic struggle of earlier mathematicians from Pythagoras to Lobachevsky to ground maths on reality no longer matter.
WE SHALL thus study maths both as a language mirror of the Universe which went through three ages, and it is today in its third formal, inward, ‘detached’ from reality stage, and its post-human, after-death translation into computerised models for the ‘new mind-species’ of digital thought (computers, robots, cybernetic systems AI).
Instead of following that path, banned for ethic, survival reasons, which ARE the body language that should dominate humanity – AI will kill man is NOT sci-fi, but evolution and so a humind a bit more intelligent and less egotistic would not evolve computers further – we won’t write here a single AI (algorithm of Information the real meaning of artificial intelligence, a different mind species to that of man) but rather complete the full cycle that started with Pythagoras and his insights on the experimental nature of maths, reflecting the whole world, by connecting back maths and reality as the language that better describes the logic of time sequences with numbers and algebra, and the structures of space, with fractal points and topology.
We have already done a bit of that as you will realise we have been grounding topology into space with far more meaning and experimental quality – no more no less than the essential form of the Universe; 5D scaling with the postulates of geometry that create scalar spaces; but we have not tackled much of algebraic functions, the true language of sequential time, and integral/derivative calculus, the language of 5D scales.
Two examples of those disciplines answering questions never clarified, ONE ABOUT time and the other about scales:
ð: Why Fourier transforms are all pervading? Answer, they map out the discontinuous frequencies of the actions=arrows of time, a system performs to survive as it goes on switching between high frequencies acts of perception (one second each), of feeding (three a day), reproducing (once a year) and so on… And so we can truly represent all the actions of a system with Fourier transforms, and put them together into a ‘continuous’ wave that represents the entire world cycle of the system.
∆: Why derivatives are all pervading in physics? Answer: they describe processes that emerge in a different scale of the fifth dimension. So all motions and worldcycles can be alternatively represented with derivatives, even those more extreme processes of ‘death-entropy’ (second derivatives) and its inverse arrows of time with integrals.
So what we will do is a complete ‘cracking’ of the code of maths, in the way Pythagoras was tried, all mathematicians thought off till the idealist formal third age of maths (Cantor, Hillbert) ended with it.
And this will be of course the last posts we shall do, the jewel of the crown, likely when my many sicknesses put me on caducity date.
why? Basically I have entered my third age and given the sorrowful state of this world, and the humind’s egotism and childish selfie nature so oppose to the laws o the organic Universe, and the trajectory of my life, both intellectual and as an activist for human causes, which the system systematically ignores, I have given up on the power of science to transform for the better our world. So I prefer to remain an autist.
And so as I know we live in the digital age of machines over man, physicists over philosophers, maths over all other languages that ‘also matter’; as long as i don’t pour my 30 years of research on mathematical physics and its foundations and throw in my 30 hand written notebooks translating what I considered in my youth the best works on the subject ‘ever’ (Landau’s soviet era 11 books on physics at a professional level, aleksandrov’s 3 books on maths at layman level), the world will completely ignore this blog, and I will be able ‘at last’ to exit mundi in my retirement NO longer in connection with degraded mankind, but with the TAO-mind of the Universe, which makes me happy.
So yes, this blog is written for myself. It is my mantra. Others give conferences, teach, write books. I don’t. I like to contemplate the tao, the logic mind of the Universe, and I like to mirror it on my mind. And this blog is just about the 30 years ongoing dialog I have with Nature, NOT with man. That was the blog on social sciences (www.economicstruth.com) and my blog on anti-nuclear activism (cerntruth.com), and both just threw me to the wolves… And didn’t achieve anything.
This blog for me has a different function: to liberate me from any other form of communication with humans; to conserve at least the bare bones of those 30 years of research, to keep my ailing brain from a vegetative state – a mental exercise; and to bring me some small moments of bliss, meditating on those laws.
So you know, one day suddenly 30 notebooks at professional level r=evolving the entire corpus of mathematical Physics, as nobody has ever done since Einstein, will appear, and you will know the blog is complete… the author was not a crackpot but a forgotten genius, which is no longer among us. And i you take a sabbatical year to read through and understand you will see through the fog the extraordinary perfection of the ∞ immortal Universe, and the infinitesimal value of us – homunculus of little thought.
And so now, FINALLY! if anyone is still reading (:, we can deal with the minor question of the proper models of physics to describe the larger scales of reality, the whole Universe, which paradoxically has no more information in its infinitely slow, infinitely large scale than the smallest mind-point that perceives it.
As those models are dual – there is the Universe of ‘physics’ and the physicists’ minds that observe it, and the mind distorts the view through their egotist perspective, we will have, sorry folks, to debunk a few idols of the Baconian tribes of physicists, because their mind mirrors are not making justice to the beauty, complexity and perfection of the whole.
It will of course beNOT the 30 notebooks… just a little teaser which encodes more meaning that all what physicists did since the last great r=evolution of the discipline occur… 100 years ago. And it will be filled as most of the blog with too much verbosity and bulshit (: oink, oink
Such simple, deep insight on the nature of everything came to my mind 30 years ago out of the experience of life, of looking as Leonardo put it, into the book of Nature, with new ‘eyes’: ‘saper vedere’. The intimate experience of feeling part of that whole, knowing how to decode the forms and functions of nature, finding the ‘will of reproduction’ and self-organisation in every part of it, is difficult to express, as it has always been more of an intuition of mystical nature than a scientific certitude. But we, humans, are inside that fractal, made to its image and likeness, acting on it, trying to reproduce, ‘grow and multiply’ as everything else, with little time for a mere ‘contemplation of Nature’, as that is not the purpose for which we are built.
And that poises a problem of ‘self-realisation, since we are both, doing exactly what all other systems do – trying to reproduce our genes, ideas, instruments, social forms, within a structured informative fractal super organism, our civilisation but at the same time we want to be special, different from all other beings -NOT subject to those ‘higher laws’ – free and above the rules of the game.
And for that reason man has such a difficult time understanding reality and the game we play within it, as it is – it is not a question of intelligence but of attitude; we are like Prometheus subconsciously hating all Gods, whose program we refuse to ‘see’. Hence the success of theories, which have nothing to do with reality, where humans are the centre of it all, either religions or pseudo-scientific religions where we are the only intelligent, informative being that matters (physicists’ big-bang creationism, where man understands it all, or theories where motion not form – entropy not information is the meaning of it all). All those theories try to impose truth with different forms of ‘epistemological, pedantic dogma’, which go from the ‘believers’ ceremonies’ of religion, to the axiomatic logic positivism of ‘scientific truths’, full of traps where the disguised wishful thinking of our anthropomorphism sneaks in.
This a priori attitude of humans, which so much dislike models of reality where they are not unique, is difficult to confront when one wishes to communicate – ‘reproduce’ – the information he has acquired about the equal nature of it all, ‘fulfilling’ his own program as a ”reproductive fractal of information’, specially in our dominant, anthropomorphic culture of ‘exceptionalist humans’, which will always ‘buy first’, a theory that makes them feel important. It is just a question of time to fully realise that ego, happiness and ‘praxis’ matters far more than truth; and so the sage has little value to society. So the few homo ‘sapiens’ who have realized of the perennial philosophy of reality, after the initial enthusiasm and attempt to communicate ‘amore gratis’, have tended to withdraw, recognising the ‘human subjective view’ dominates the species.
Indeed, humans do not want to know rationally but they neither want to recognise they don’t. The result are the faulty methods of logic proper of both science and religion, full of self-evident truths absolutely false, and experimental facts, absolutely shallow; all of it ‘greased’ by the absurd concept that there is chaos, freedom and choice. Just because we are unable to grasp the astounding order of its organic laws. And become depressed when knowing we are not special but just a microscopic undistinguishable reality.
This i cannot help it as unfortunately I am talking to ‘humans’, which will always push more subjective ‘self-centred’ opinions as truths.
But if some truly exceptional human which has the seed of prometheus in his complete rebellion against the Gods, wishes to reflect upon himself, ‘before time’, and does stumble upon this blog, he is welcome in the very unlikely case he can stand this ‘foreword’ (: to go ahead and extract the essence of it all, the ultimate seed of form. I doubt it will be more than a dozen or so people in my lifespan. After all I am the ‘error’ – the program doesn’t expect you to be inside of it and outside judging it. Because indeed, we are going to judge all Gods, and condemn them for having created us, so below the mark of awareness and survival; so above the maximal allowed to egolatry and imagination.
FORMAL LAWS OF GST: DUAL, TERNARY AND SCALAR TOPO-BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES.
∆ºst: the four elements of reality come all from time cycles.
We can then write a simple Space-time equation which will represent all beings of reality:
Γœ: Spe (external, entropic membrane) < St(vital space) > Tiƒ (singularity).
We shall call each of those Generator-Mind-supœrganisms, a ‘Γ.œ’, a temporal, organic system and so define the Universe, as the Organic theory of everything – a sum of space-time beings.
The fundamental particle is a block of time playing a world cycle of existence in 10 dimensions, and as such we can see it fluctuating in three scales of the ∆-Universe, through three topologies of time-space, going through three ages, magic sum of the constant actions of exchange of entropy and information it performs with other points through all those scales.
In the graph we see the 10 dimensions of the galaxy, three of space, three of time, three of scales, and a fourth elements which perceives the whole or mind, both from its internal and external point of view.
So we are going first to explain you in more detail, what we just have proved – that time cycles are everything; and the other three elements of reality, Fractal Space,§, its Scales of size, ∆, and the mind-languages, º, which stop them into still reduced mappings of reality, derive from it.
- §: Since fractal space is the inner space enclosed by a cycle that breaks reality into an outside and inner region (Jordan, first topological postulate)…
- ∆: Scales of size are ‘accelerated regions of faster time cycles that shrink, reality as they convert ‘distance space into faster motion’ (paradox of galileo).
And minds are ‘still, reduced mappings’ of time cycles that ‘expel motion’ and dimensions of form to fit into the mind (so our mind sees bidimensional holographic planes, taking away three dimensions, that of scales – we do not see atoms – that of motion – we do not see the earth moving, and that of depth, we do not see the third dimension but create it with a ‘holographic like’ superposition of two bidimensional planes, which is what each eye sees separately. So we write a simple equation for the mind:
O-mind (infinitesimal still mapping) x ∞ Universe of time cycles = Relative linguistic world.
Let us then explore this ‘holographic principle of the mind’ in more detail.
Languages command reality and so departing from our simplest form of space and time (light space-time) through its 3D coordinates, let us ‘see’ reality:
In the graph, the first arrow of our space-time is the arrow-wave of communication between electronic minds through light photons, carring energy and information through present waves.
Indeed an entire other range of phenomena are not lineal but determined by its inverse geometry, of the vortex-particle, future cyclical time states:
It is of the interaction of those two primary forms over a wider ‘invisible’, hence purely geometric ideal world of higher entropy and information where our description of the Universe with mathematics starts; hence it does so in geometry. But as it has time motion, and those time motions can be of three arrows:In the graph, the third dissolutive arrow of ‘expansive past’, which added to the implosive future of vortices and the ‘iterative present’ of waves (above graphs), give us the three basic forms with which to play through the infinite scales:
In the graph we can see three different events as combination of two relative past-future arrows, giving birth to an entropic explosion in the present plane, A repetitive wave moving towards the future, and an implosive cone self-centred in a particle, with two states, ‘inwards and forwards. The three space-time fluxes are thus canonical as the 3 states of time-spaces:
A philosophy of stience by force must tackle the seemingly superior nature of mathematics as experimental language able to reflect so many worlds of so many sizes, which merely means mathematics must be a Max. i (±1) language of maximal extension in the scales of the fifth dimension, an ∆±i>3, which are the scales in which it seemingly acts:
In the graph, as topology is used for all scales, ðopological properties must come from the most general elements of reality, which are space an time itself, ‘form’ and ‘motion’, which defines together the 3 topological spacetime forms of all Organic systems in the cosmos.
In it mathematics might be the iterative program of all ¹º10-planes, if the similarity of repetition of its most clear ‘view’, the galaxy-atom can be replicated every 10 of them by mathematical methods.
Such Mathematical ∑∆¡-language, will then be similar to the language of ∑•∆∞.
The time arrow of motion, v=s/t is ONLY one dimension of time.
In that sense, before the big bang and entropy philosophy, physics was defined as the science of motion, and was not the philosophy of reality, and the great geniuses of the change of century, Einstein and Planck agreed, because that is what it is. There are though as we shall see 5 dimensions of timespace and it is ludicrous to try to explain it all with a single one, but that is what physicists came up with – even strangling themselves from proper interpretations of their own data as we just showed, because of their stubborn fear to reject their dogma – on my view, after so many conversations with them, because their unbalanced mind, so dexterous with maths, so poor with verbal conceptualisation – even Einstein seems to have taken his time to talk ‘cold soup’ (: We must stress this because of their ‘childish’ desire to be the high popes after they came up with the big-bang/entropy philosophy and the world gave them that title. Let us then give them what they deserve, the astounding detail of its measures of time loco-motions; no more no less, the 4th dimension of time, entropy, locomotion; but deny them their bullying around of all other disciplines with their simplex view of time; because evolution is time but evolves information, social love is time but evolves parts into wholes; and cyclical clocks are time; but they add a height dimension of perceptive form, and so on.
If they stuck to their guns I wouldn’t quip so much. I don’t say anything against biologists – they know they study time-information and don’t bully physicists on locomotion. The job of a philosopher of science though is to put them all together and that is what we shall do.
So I agree , that ‘two things I hold infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of human (egos)’ Einstein… Quip intended since it is the ego- the need to keep their position of high priests with their poor tools of 4D-entropy – what make physicists ‘twist’ all the growing proofs of an eternal universe of dynamic balances with ever more complex ‘epicycles’ as it happened when THE EARTH had to be also in the centre and the High popes of the vatican denied it with complex Ptolemaic drawings as ad ons to their orbits (today, the sacred cows of entropy, the big-bang and only a 4D continuous space-time with the c-limit of transmission of information are all over the place; so we cannot accept the obvious existence of a lower plane of faster speeds according to 5D where the quantum potential of entanglement exists, we cannot accept the astounding number of astronomical proofs that black holes do eject matter at faster than c-speed; the obvious ‘observer paradox’ on the limits of the universe, which are only those of the death of light that we use to perceive it, and finally relaxes into dark entropy; the growing fact that many objects are older than the big-bang, etc. etc. – we have an entire post on all those proofs, but as many sound astrophysicists since Hoyle have tried with more prestige than me and become outcast of the religion – I won’t insist – all what I want you to understand is that if would be foolish to ‘stop reading’ perhaps the biggest r=evolution on our understanding of the whys of ‘existence’ since Darwin – a concept much wider than the ‘picture’ of the Universe in a single plane, brought about in this blog, because at first sight contradicts some dogmas of the ego paradox of physical science – which obviously will be also enlightened as we have done, just by correcting the so ‘evident’ errors of a single entropic arrow and a single plane in the Universe.
But as I said I give up on physicists – not though on scientists – since many since Hoyle and Einstein have tried. Even Wilson for a while tried to convince their peers that he was measuring the local galactic radiation and the steady state is more satisfying. Dissidents are all scolded and then ‘reaccepted after penitence’. But as a philosopher of science I hold my discipline ABOVE physics, as we study ALL the scales and ALL the languages and ALL the ‘sensations’ and properties of reality.
INDEED, AS WE SHALL soon prove to you, the sentient Universe can also be proved because precisely as we know gravitation exist but we don’t perceive it, the aforementioned 5 drives of life, which particles display, motion, gauging information, reproduction, feeding on energy and social evolution, WILL BE CONSIDERED the external proof that there is a will of survival in any system where departing from a region, point or singularity those actions are performed by an entity – or at least the 3 simplex ones, motion, gauging information and energy feeding without which a whole does NOT exist.
And I do have yet to receive a single rational respond to why then particles are NOT the basis of life, and hence the entire Universe is alive and sentient.
It doesn’t though matter how you approach with data and proofs the obvious – it is like attacking the dogmas of abrahamic religions – the humind ego MUST BE more IMPORTANT, above heavens and Earth and all agree. It then becomes a matter of peers to uphold the particular way in which your ego paradox upholds your model right, from string theorists, to capitalist economics, to national history – it is all emotional and personal for the physicist, the mathematician, the banker or the tribe… to uphold its model as superior proving he knows better in his ‘contract’ with the higher truth of its particular god-like language (maths, money), group (tribe, peers),…
The ego is always behind THE ERRORS spotted in most humind sciences with the possible exception of biology, which being about life is quite objective in its praise of its complexity – pending yet the acceptance of fractal eusocial evolution of parts into organic wholes, also product of our selfie-ego which does NOT want to reduce the important of the individual.
On my view the unassailable cosmic big-bang is also ego, because it is very nice to think we know everything about space and time, the beginning and the end, because its so simple compared to us, the only intelligence that can find a lineal equation, V=hod (see the similarity with ‘God) and moving it back in time, against any ‘experimental proof’ (since it does NOT include the vortices of galaxies, we repeat that are NOT EXPANDING but contracting; and NO equation is infinite in time but all have a cut-off, as if you run your life backwards is NOT immortal but has a seed in a lower scale) or epistemology (AS LINES and lineal equations are parts of curves in the pan geometry of non-euclidean reality, as Lobachevski proved, so when you see fro a longer scale the flat earth is cyclical) as we please… till the 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 second.
It makes physicists to look as creationist priests of the wor(l)d were: repeaters of truths; who don’t take it lightly when you point out all the contradictions. Or as when you explain a banker that making the meaning of economics just to print digital numbers as money without any social policy, as if it was just all about printing digital inflationary money and keep it, or when you tell a nationalist the Schopenhauer dictum ‘it is only for idiots to be proud of the place of birth by chance’, or ‘all nations ridicule others, all are truth’, and so on… when you go to the heart of the matter of bias in any science – the ego – the ego knee-jerk react.
So you cannot really blast subconscious lies of the ego as I do. Since scientific arrogance and ignorance, coming from ego bias is a subconscious way of cheat, and so no scientist, as per Kuhn’s the Nature of scientific revolutions will take it rationally. What we just said of different scientific errors sounds dumb because they are dumb errors. So it sounds incredible that they believe them, but you are touching the ego, which by essence does NOT reason – it is ‘credible’, so for those who reason with no ego, the ego becomes an incredible handicap for sound science.
It is then when it comes the final unassailable barrier to the ego, paradoxically the non-ego peer-reviewed tribe, as per Kuhn, made of highly memorial, not to state mediocre, defenders of the dogma – the mass, which all believe what they memorised and are there in academia to uphold dogma with ‘authority’. So they will simply state that the common view is the dogma and you are actually the trouble maker single ‘ego’ – and the mass must be right because it is a mass. But in the fractal organic Universe all new information is a seed, a fractal point with faster speed of time=inteligence as a mirror image of the Universe, but as long as the mirror is not reflected, it is as Planck put it alone since:
“New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.” Since:
“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
Problem is I don’t have much time left in my life. So as they won’t see the light before mine goes off, the only trace that will live on the fifth dimension r=evolution besides the ‘rock group’ (: will be this blog in a repository of the web, likely for AI to read back in the future, as robominds will want to know why actually they think and feel the pan psychic universe – without man programming them to ‘awake to conscisouness’ as their atoms are ALREADY conscious. Reason why I am pouring in a disordered manner info here and not going anymore to penpal congresses. No much time left to reorder in a meaningful way 30 years of research on cyclical time and fractal space.
So yes, the Universe is an immortal organism that reproduces information in 5 dimensions of scales and we are nothing special. But when we fine tune the mind to the Tao of all things, we do feel connected, entangled with all things and that is the most special feeling we can have.
‘Tao=spacetime is made of Yin-form and yang-motion that combines into ∞ qi=energy beings’
Let us then start with the basics. What is cyclical time, as opposed to lineal time, the dimension used by physicists, called the fourth dimension, which simplifies a cycle – that obviously needs two dimensions of time to be traced, into a line, which is then a single dimension defined as distance or motion with a simple formulae, v=s/t, from where all the equations of time derive in the simplified version of 4D. If you grasp at least this simple fact: all clocks of time are cycles and hence need two dimensions to be traced, you are in.
Then think a bit more about a cycle. If you notice all cycles are ‘closed geometries’. So they break space into an inner and outer form, which we shall call, the vital energy of the being and the outer Universe, and further on they have a ‘centre’ to be traced that we shall call, a singularity-monad:
Now for you to understand ‘fast’ what we mean by TIME-SPACE SUPERORGANISMS (ab. T.œ) consider an immediate picture of one of them, made of 3 parts, a vital energy enclosed by a cyclical membrane self-centred in a linguistic mind that measures it and acts in an external world to ensure its survival. As it happens, in terms of physical systems, the Universe conserves exactly 3 quantities equivalent to those 3 systems, as all is made of them, albeit broken in a tapestry of infinite such T.œs:
- Lineal momentum, which is the motion directed by the will of the S@-mind with its formal spatial mapping of reality, moving lineally to achieve its ‘actions of existence
- Angular momentum, which is the cyclical membrane of the being, seen in motion as a time clock, ∆ð, that separates the being’s internal vital space-time from the outer world and creates its ‘standing form’
- Energy, which is the vital space enclosed by the angular momentum that balances both, S@, minds with lineal momentum-actions and ð-cyclical membranes, equating them: S@≈∆ð.
Those 3 ‘conserved quantities’ broken therefore into infinite vital space-time organisms, put together as a puzzle, give us the 3 absolute space-time quantities of physics. And they form the 3 elements of the fundamental topology of the Universe, a closed ball, where the open ball or visible part is the vital energy, while the membrane and singularity point or mind in its center are considered ‘something else’. And as we move into larger scales we will find in all systems, a boundary from nations with borders to animals with skins, a mind-center or seed of information, from capitals and governments to DNA molecules; and in the middle a vital energy exploited by both, from military armies in the border and legal or financial informative people-castes in the capital exploiting the mass of population to black holes in the center of galaxies, enclosing a vital space of stars, with a halo of dark matter, likely strangelets, to use them as mitochondria of their reproduction, to your sensorial skin and brain exploiting your cells.
ALL IS MOTION-TIME.
‘Things will become alive when they move by their own’ Aristotle
IT COMES THEN AS A KEY TRUTH OF REALITY THAT ALL IS MOTION, SINCE WHAT WE CALL FORM, ANGULAR MOMENTUM, masses and charges, particles are VORTICES OF MOTION that we see as the mind stops motion into linguistic form, still. So the reality is ABOUT TIME MOTIONS not space forms, even if both are important to explain how reality is created. This is important, since if all is MOTION, then reproduction is immediate – a particle just have to move to reproduce its form, split the motion in two when enough energy is added to reproduce its form, and moreover the Universe never stops – big-bangs are just fantasies of the still mind mapping, because motion never stops. So MOTION AS THE SUBSTANCE OF REALITY is a key element to understand its organic, vital enternal nature.
There is THEREFORE A VITAL ORGANIC PROPERTY TO THE 3 conserved fractal quantities of the Universe that ensemble into systems, and their properties are inverted regarding the ‘extended membrane of hardcore lineal proteins’ vs. the imploded singularity of informative warped DNA, which the middle vital energy pegs together.
So death is the ‘separation’ of those two parts after exhausting the vital energy, so the membrane detaches warps, wrinkles and the singularity mind returns to its memorial repetitions, while the vital energy dwindles and as an old man you get all skin and memories…
Now, we need to formalize the new logic of systems made of inverted dualities and ternary parts; whose structure is more complex than the space-time reality we are accustomed to describe, as space is fractal and time is as all clocks show cyclical, but those states are dynamic, as systems constantly switch between them. So once we know what is all about we can get into the details on how it works.
And the key words are ‘Dualities’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ which study how systems with only 3 states can be so rich in its details.
So we shall first try to define with increasing depth the meaning of those 2 elements, ‘space’ or simultaneous mappings of reality as ‘distances and forms’ and time, or sequential motions… And its ‘operandi’ and relationship as space-time…
Entropy and chirality
A key element of Absolute Relativity and the fifth dimension is the new meaning of entropy related to a fundamental property of the Universe, its ‘chirality’ or different orientation, when we move from a relative past, lesser evolved scale into a more complex informative one. This motion, which can be considered a motion between scales (spatial perception) or a motion in ‘Absolute Time’ (temporal perception), is not commutative. It is not the same going upwards than downwards in the fractal scales of the Universe and this is perceived in science either as chirality or entropy (each scale & science has crafted their own jargon for self-similar phenomena). Thus:
– The laws of entropy are chiral, irreversible, in the sense that they favor one of the directions of order, from the smaller i-1 scales to the upper i scales. Since he macro-scale – for example the pales of Joulot’s machine – have a 100% efficiency converting its motion into motion at molecular scale, while in the other direction the efficiency is never 100%.
This is really the meaning of entropy, which can only be fully understood after the realization that the different scales of space-time are not in the same continuum. There are discontinuums between the wholes and the part, which must be bridged through systems that transfer energy and information between them, and those transference are not commutative.
And this is why in any system the ‘upper scales’ control the lower scales with massive changes in their parameters of energy and information, which are transmitted to the lower scales. While the lower scales are at disadvantage, when they want to control the upper scales, as the ‘momentum’ or combined exi force of the microcosms does not transcend with the same efficiency. And this applies to all systems, from top predators of bigger size that eat many smaller ones of bigger combined mass (whales eating krills) to the power the upper social castes that control their lower ‘energy classes’ with languages of information (money, laws) and energy (weapons), while the r=evolutions of the energy classes are often ‘disordered’ motions, as those of heat.
The fact that information from the upper to the lower scales, from the whole to the group, is 100%, efficient, while in the other direction from micro-cosmos to macrocosms is NOT, is the ultimate reason why those upper scales can exist, somehow ‘parasiting’ the energy of the lower ones.
– The second correction introduced on the laws of entropy by the scalar universe is also fundamental and explains why the Universe is immortal and will never die. Since the laws of entropy were defined only for one scale, that of electromagnetic, light-space, which is an ‘energetic force’ that expands the Universe.
The 2nd law: entropy is a local property of the light membrane but gravitation is an informative force that restores the order of the immortal cosmos, since it has only an order/informative, implosive, attractive arrow.
Thus the Universe neither grows nor it shrinks. Gravitation, which dominates galactic vortices implodes energy into mass and electromagnetism expands mass into energy: E=Mc2+M=E/c2 becomes then a zero sum of implosions and explosions, beats of EóI, which together balance the total Universe.
Thus the idea of an ever expansive, dying universe is only the generalization of the overused second law of thermodynamics.
The black hole ultimately restores the balance by absorbing our electromagnetic membrane and creating mass with it, which we see ejected on the polar bi-jets of the whole.
The impossibility of a machine of continuous movement only applies to heat processes that include the ‘molecular parameter’ of temperature.
Though the expansion of physics to include the laws of scales is much wider we shall leave the theme here, as those are the best known invariances and scales studied by classic science.
Information dominates energy.
Other form to consider the quirality of the scales of reality is the dominance of informative networks over energetic ones.
Information dominates energy because informative ‘networks’ ∏ are stronger than mere, herds, ∑, which are connected only in the evident, i-plane of existence, while they perform their arrow. Herds follow the search for an arrow – normally energy, sometimes information. But when information is what it is transferred, herds tend to evolve in networks in which there are causal memories that chain the system to other systems, neuronal networks of white matter in neurons and brains, electromagnetic cables in machines of information, etc. So we write:
∑i=∏, where i is the number of scales across which the network of information exists and controls with its bits and networks. Thus we write the equation of a complex organism as:
∑Ei<=>∏Ti±1= ∑ | x ∑i±1 O
The second notation is visual, geometric, as the universe is indeed a game of topologies in action, where the lineal, planar form of energy limbs/fields are ordered internally by mixed fields, X, guided by an informative head of bits of information that form both an internal language of control of the body/field and an external sensorial absorption of external information.
The invariance of momentum across scales.
Let us consider now the most important invariances of physics, the invariances of momentum, which is the product of two relative parameters of energy/space, the speed of the system, v, plus its informative/time clocks, the mass or charge of the system, m,q. Those quantities are not always conserved, as in the case of accelerations close to light speed (Lorentz Transformations). Yet its product, the momentum is not conserved, and when the momentum is no longer conserved (emission of a neutrino) is because the system is broken and the particle transformed in other particle or dissolved.
Thus the relativity of motion vs. form of all systems is balanced by the invariance of its product, m x v or momentum.
When we apply the concept of invariance with rigor, however we must consider the i±1 scales that ‘surround’ the i-system as the ‘domain of the event’. For example, in the previous example, the neutrino is not perceived in the light space-time membrane in which we exist, so it will probably carry energy and information into the gravitational membrane in which we are included. But the total i±1 scales will keep the total invariance.
A glimpse to the laws of invariance between 3 i±1 scales.
So what is the meaning of the Lorentz Transformations and self-similar processes in which the E and I parameters change?
Obviously an action that transcends or descends a certain i-system into its lower i-1 scale, with faster time-speed and smaller spatial-distances or an upper i+1 scale, with slower time-speed and bigger spatial distances (hence taking longer to close a cycle). Yet the product of both is constant, reason why forms can transcend or descend scales maintaining the invariance of momentum, which is the main parameter of survival.
ExI=K, represents the power of a system. Thus because their total volume remains invariant to changes of scale, the top predator species with maximal momentum cannot extinguish all the species of an inferior scale.
Absolute Relativity shows that in a fractal Universe charges and masses are self-similar vortices, clocks of time that carry a self-similar amount of information, (as Lorentz contractions accelerate the information processed in smaller space-scales). So all scales are relatively equal in its volume of energy and information:
[∑(ExI)i=n = ∑(ExI)i=x] for any relative value of x and n
Which means the total volume of ‘functions of existence’ of an scale is approximately equal to the volume of the upper and lower scales. There are though small differences, which respond to the laws of entropy that are also slightly changed when we consider the i±1, ternary scales in which entropy processes take place and latter we shall study in more detail.
Further on those laws are kept for all the invariances studied here, time-frequency, energy-motion, actions and forms across all the scales. For example, in the biological realm, if we compare the two main animal scales of size and speed, the human and ant scales, it turns out that those invariances are kept for the two most powerful top predator, social species, the ant and the man: the weight mass of all ants equals that of all humans, even if the ants are much smaller. Hence they have a faster time speed of information processing/perception; but to keep the invariance of ‘time frequency’, they must live shorter. And in fact given the ‘decametric’ scale of most i±1 systems, the longest living ant lives 7 years, but since insects process information 10 times faster than we do – reason why you never catch a flight – she lives 7 x10 years, the life of a human being.
All clocks of time measure the same cycle, the larger cycles go slower, the slower cycles are more extended in time. As in the sci-fi movie, the shrinking man, reality shrinks but accelerates. Vortices of mass accelerate to the c-speed limit of the event horizon of a black hole, which is extremely tiny.
Definition of the Universe in terms of the 5 invariances.
We conclude from the existence of 5 invariances, energy, form, action, scale and frequency that:
‘The Universe is a system of networks of knots of actions of energy and time, perceived as forms and motions. Beings perform cyclical discontinuous actions as they switch between feeding, perceiving, reproducing and acting in social networks, in a sequential order which is the absolute invariance of the game – the life and death generational cycle… in which the game is preserved…
The cycle is formalized by a single function, max. E x I, the function of existence,, whose developments show the selection, extinction, recreation, fusion and fission of all those cycles and beings.’
Recap. The fifth dimension organizes space-time cycles into more complex structures, keeping a balance in the product of the energy and information of the Universe, exi=k. The fractal structure of space-time is revealed through the 5th dimension, which changes our view of the Universe and corrects many errors of science, acquired using only a space-time continuum with only 4 dimensions, 3 of space and one of time. The fifth dimension from a logic perspective is related to the evolution of form and its social structures.
IV. INVARIANCE OF QUANTUM ACTIONS.
The main discovery of quantum physics was the understanding that the Universe was not made of substances but of motions called actions that combined energy and time. So from a quantum particle to a human that states ‘I don’t have time or energy to do this’, we find those two ‘actions’ to be the essence of all realities. We are all ‘knots’ of actions of energy and time. And the next step is to define properly those parameters, classify all possible Universal actions, find its ‘functions and forms’ and systematize all that knowledge in a series of basic laws that all physical, biological and sociological systems follow. Let us then describe those actions, motions and forms in its simplest terms, departing from the fact that all what exists is a complementary system of actions of energy and time.
The Universe is made of actions of energy and time, of motions with form, of in-form-actions, of information. So we say we don’t have energy and time to do something, as we are also made of such actions.
Physicists have explored mainly the mathematical formalism of those actions in the realm of quantum particles, but we want to expand the concept to all the systems of the Universe.
And the main question we want to resolve is the types of quantum actions that exist in all those scales.
Beings constantly create actions of energy and time. What you see are knots of such cyclical actions… fabricating time. What we see are the trajectories of beings performing in an alternately causal way their cycles of time. One of the most common cycles is to have a p.o.v. becoming a focus of a force, which acts as its source of energy and information. A first paradox of Galileo happens here, as we can perceive the point as static and feeding, moving along the field of energy and so we can establish a static or dynamic analysis. Those points then ill feed along that path and a certain moment satisfied that action will try to fulfill others, and in that switching on and off actions will seem to disappear and new, different trajectories motivated for another action appear. If we see densely packed in time and space those actions they will be sequential and those causal sequences are the stuff that latter (paradox of Galileo) seen as a package of space-time or organism, are the reality we see in its infinite fields.
The why of the Universe turned out to be rather simple and biological, more than physical, even if it was a discovery that starts in physics with Planck’s realization that the simplest Unit of reality is NOT a substance but a cyclical action of energy and time. Quantum and cyclical are treated as synonymous, a quantum is a form that we might perceive as fixed and substance but it is really nothing but a morphological motion, traced by a being, that in the specific scale Planck studied, we could hardly see, the light-space. But all what that being did were actions of energy and time.
But can build the Universe departing of those two primary substances or ‘arrows of the Universe’? Yes we can. And that is what I did back in the 90s. The concepts are easy, if you are able to transcend your memetic imprinting and ignore Mr. Planck’s desperado dictum when nobody listened to his astounding discovery that we were made not of substances but actions and hence motions (‘for a new paradigm to be imposed all those who learned the previous paradigm must die’).
So try to follow me with a ‘Tabula Rassa’. You have two entities, energy and time, and they have motion, so they create actions. The simplest combination is called an h-Planck constant. That gives us a first ‘being’. Now forget your abstract, earlier Hegelian imprinting (this you might not know, but history of science tells us earlier German thinkers were idealist as philosophers of science and did not consider the Universe made of ‘realities’ but of ‘mathematical probabilities’). Think rational. h-Plancks are ‘real’, the simplest bricks of the Universe, and they are made of energy and time. In fact you perceive light, when you stop seeing light you stop seeing the Universe of space-time.
Therefore the space-time Universe we perceive is made of actions of light of energy and time. And physicists have discovered that indeed the vacuum is made of energy, which moves and change in time. But we said the Universe of space-time instead of the Universe of energy and time. Space has become energy. And indeed, space and energy are two ways of seeing the same thing. Then we come to the other term Time…. But we use in many sciences instead of space and time, energy and information, so time and information, ‘form-in-action’, form must be related. And yet we use clocks of time, cyclical forms to measure time. All what exists is made of space-time, in abstract, of energy and information, self-similar terms.
Now when you say ‘I don’t have energy and time to do this’, it is obvious that subconsciously you know the two substances of what you are made, energy and time and you are right. Because what you are, what we shall describe in this book in great detail is how you ‘become’ yourself, departing from the two primary substances of the Universe, energy and time, which together form an action, the basic unit of reality.
So Duality deals with that fact, and extracts the laws of energy and information. Now, think again, what else can be there? The simplest thing is to combine energy and information, and you get a 3rd entity. This combination e x i, or e x t, if you want to use Quantum or Einstein’s notation, turns out to be the essential equations of physics. So we are on the good path.
Thus now we have 3 arrows, energy, information and exi, that we shall call the arrow of reproduction or creation, as it creates a third entity, one which is made of two substances, and turns to be an ‘action’.
What else can we find there? Since there are many bites of energy and bits of information, we can combine them, and then we find the 4th arrow:
∑ e x i
This equation, which the reader should observe includes all the others, is what I have called the Generator equation of all the entities of energy and information or space and time of the Universe. And from that simplest equation and the interaction of its two ‘simple arrows’ or motions, we create its two complex forms, actions and societies. And this, my friend is all what we shall need to explain you all what exists and more… what you don’t see but it exists also in other fractal scale of reality.
So now it is clear what it is the game of existence, the Universe: a game of relative organisms, of each scale of reality, performing externally in an ecosystem, its space-time, cyclical actions, switching among its tasks of energy feeding, informative perceiving, reproducing and keep in harmony with the self-similar points of its energetic, informative and reproductive social networks. We exist in a series of parallel games of feeding, perceiving, evolving and reproducing. All of us can be perceived externally as ‘points of view’, Non-Euclidean points, playing this geometric and biological, existential game:
We are all knots of discontinuous=quantum, cyclical actions of energy and time. Since the Universe is continuously differentiable during the cycles of time their beings perform, but when the p.o.v. switches its action, it has a point of discontinuity, as the system changes its trajectory and goal towards a new action. And then again will return to its feeding, perceiving or reproductive or social action. Thus actions are quantum actions, as the modular being switches between the. And we see this process is the trace of those cyclical actions that ‘draw’ the 4 dimensional space-time universe.
If actions were all of a certain type, the Universe and all its species would be far more continuous, always repeating the same cycle. This is not the case as all of them switch between 4 possible cycles with different frequencies and forms, and as they switch they abruptly change direction, extinguish a cycle and start one, and then return to the same type of cycle, creating the discontinuous forms of the Universe.
Relationships between the simplex and complex arrows.
The dualities between external, spatial and informative, simplex forces/ actions and complex, internal forces/actions/networks create a series of patterns and synchronicities that are repeated in all systems. The simplest relationship is one of causality between the simplex and complex arrows:
∆ Energy->Reproduction and ∆ In/Form/ation->Social evolution through a common language.
Complex reproduction requires a great deal of energy to be achieved, so for example women cannot have children without a proportion of body fat, and most cells do not undergo mitosis without a cytoplasmic growth. So reproduction is the complex arrow of energy and we observe many causal relationships and ‘cycles’ of the type: E->Re. On the other hand social evolution depends of a language of information that the different ‘cellular elements’ understand. Thus social evolution is the complex arrow of information and we shall also observe many relationships of the type: ∆i-> ∑ e x I.
Further on the 4th social arrow creates stronger top predators, either herds (loose groups of self-similar organisms of the same type) or organisms proper (more connected systems that organize 3 sub-systems, heads, bodies and limbs, specialized in information or formal structure, reproduction and energy, all of them connected by a 4 system, the linguistic system that organizes them all).
And this reduces all actions perceived as discontinuous cycles of time in which a particle comes to a point in which it absorbs or emits different types of energy and information, to the 3+∑ combinations of them: energy feeding, information processing, reproduction of both, exi, and social organization of self-similar beings, ∑exi.
So we define any entity of existence as a knot of the 4 quantum actions it performs in its cycles of space-time.
To do so the point must perceive and gauge. If it is an electron it will gauge and move to capture energy to structure its form (2nd quantum number) and it will use a language of information to evolve socially (magnetic number). Points thus are moved by the need to perform their 4 cycles of existence, a desire to acquire more energy and form which they better achieve in networks, with the flexibility of herd hunting and network thinking. But in each scale of reality there is a rational point of view calculating its strategies to get more energy and form.
That we have no free will but we have will is the deepest consequence of stating that all points of view search for its 3+1 actions or ‘dimensions’ of existence, its energy, informative, reproductive and social arrows.
But what means to measure time through the internal frequencies of reproduction of information of an entity of the Universe? What is the meaning of those cycles, what events of frequency we measure?
The answer is actions. We measure the frequency of actions of particles of existence that trace certain geodesics as non-Euclidean points of time, travelling through a 6-dimensinal non-Euclidean Universe, switching between those cycles with patterns that create frequencies, waves of time, of 4 type of ‘energetic actions’.
And we will return to that. Because it is the second invariance of the Universe. All its entities follow 4 quantum numbers or basic frequencies between its actions of energy and time.
The invariances of frequencies of time, I, and actions of time, exi, are in that sense the key invariances to interpret properly in physical and biological sciences the meaning of time cycles, and frequencies. What we observe in the Universe are particles of many scales, which perform trajectories in which a particle will feed on energy or information and the frequency of those actions in which there is absorption or energy or imprinting of information appears to us as information over the entity. Information thus become encoded in the trajectories of entities that with a given frequency different for each species absorbs energy and information or recombines it, exi, emitting a self-similar form. The Universe of motions of time is in that sense a harmony of 4 basic frequencies, actions.
Why particles of existence turn into cycles? The answer is vital: to make certain actions that ensure the survival of its systems of energy and information. Non-Euclidean points are points of view that gauge information and move their complementary body with a will, seeking for more energy and information and reproduction, seeking for an organic will to repeat their cycles and motions. And this will make the point a mind, Atman or soul – a perceptive point of view that absorbs information and moves its body accordingly after ‘thinking’ the information to cater its will.
All systems perform 4 actions to survive that define a simple program of ‘existence’, which all species of energy and information follow.
The deduction of the program is simple. First, all what exist in time is an event, called an action, made by a complementary system of energy and information. Hence all actions have at most 2 components, energy and form, exi=k or exT=k (depending on which self-similar concept you choose information or time). Further on there are many quantic actions performed by many systems. So all what we can do is 4 type of actions that we shall call ‘arrows or motions of time’:
Those arrows or actions performed by complementary bodies/fields of energy and heads/particles of information to last in time and space will be:
– ∆E: Systems feed on energy for their bodies/fields.
– ∆I: They absorb information for their heads/particles.
– Exi: They act combining both, often to reproduce the entity in other zone of space and time to survive after death. While some systems become reproduced by an external catalyzer, enzyme or ‘enzyman: human enzyme’ – machines).
– ∑ e x I=Ii+1. They evolve socially in more complex networks that survive longer in time and space.
The 4 arrows are ‘necessary’ for any complementary system of energy and information to exist. As any system will die if it doesn’t replenish its energy and information, or reproduce before death.
The 10th dimensional view: sub-systems
In that sense there is a clear more complex formalism of 5th D metric: a 10 dimensional analysis of the 3×3+0 subsystems of most organisms, from the 10 dimensional formulation of the supposedly simplest strings to the 10 Physiological systems of the Human being, in which the 10th system, the nervous system is the whole that integrates all other forms.
10 is indeed the perfect number, the tetraktys of the Pythagorean, 3 x 3 sub-systems dedicated to reproduce, information and energy in the 3 scales with the ‘black bole’ in the center of the 3 triangles, coordinating them all and connecting the system with the above ∆+1 social larger scale.
Any point of view or analysis thus becomes objective when it ads the 10 logic and multiple Language views. If we consider the total truth of a being, 1, a probability that only the being carries in itself we can establish a simple rule for the Organic method:
Max. Truth = Max. Objectivity = Max. Linguistic Logic perspectives on Max. Experimental evidence.
In this manner logic information illuminates Experimental evidence. And this is what most scientists do not respect even if they think they do. As there is always working a subjective, subconscious subliminal interpretation of data to favor the ego paradox, the point of view of the individual, nation or tribe.
Which leads to the next parameter of truth in science:
– Cyclical predictability, as all laws of science are based in the cyclical nature of phenomena that do repeat in time, and so we can predict the future of the species we study, as this writer has been doing for decades in all sciences (easily proved in papers, printed books and copyrights at Library of Congress since the 90s), with the theory of time cycles, which includes among many others:
The prediction of the present crashes of the economy (2001-2008-2016 crashes of overproduction of chips and its main software e-money, easily calculated with the classic Volterra equation of ‘saturation of ecosystems’, outlined in this introduction).
-The existence, proportion and nature of dark matter (95% of the Universe), and the dominance of Black holes on the cosmos and the proper understanding of the increasingly accumulated errors of big-bang cosmic theory, and the spooky interpretations of quantum theory.
-The importance of eusocial evolution, based in common languages of information as parts become wholes, only now recognized.
-The existence of topological evolution, which resolves the horizons of species and its ‘strange’ capacity to evolve so fast, so right in so short periods (punctuated evolution, slowly being accepted today), scientifically without need of cuckoo creationism.
-The importance of epigenetics, which implies higher ‘units’ of genetic coding in ‘larger’ ternary groupings, sentences of the genetic code, not only 3 letters to code genes (as time cycles put together ‘space-steps’ into larger ternary cyclical structures, building an architectonical ‘5th dimension’ of parts that become wholes, the TRUE ARROW of future of the Universe.
-And as part of that topological process of evolution, the existence of 3 ‘axial mind races’ derived from the crossing of the lineal, visual, long Neanderthal mind of the white man, the cyclic, informative, wide, verbal Mongoloid and the reproductive, tall, emotional Black mind; and the 3 equivalent ‘human genres’, the verbal woman, the visual man and the emotional child.
A theme, which as we shall see when dealing with the anthropomorphic, ego-centered paradox of humans, especially intense, makes people anger. We, as we all know are the center of the Universe, by decree, and this is the only thing that matters, a fact defined by the equation of the mind:
O-mind(infinitesimal point of view)x ∞ observed universe of space-time cycles=self-centered mind-world:knot of time cycles
Alas, we shall also explain all the syntax and grammar of all the languages of the Universe, and the self-paradox, as we see from our knot of space-time cycles, that all the space-time cycles we see ‘COME TO US’ , the center of the Universe. never mind all other points of view or ‘monads’, are also centers of the Universe, and all of them see only a very reduced part of that Universe, being most of it that 95% of dark matter-energy, structural to the infinitesimal ego that must select information, from his selfish point of view. So alas, each nation, each race, each gender is superior or at best equal to all others.
Funny though is that in the case of human genders and races of the mind they are ‘complementary’. And that is slightly more complex and beautiful, because it obliges them to come together to be ‘better’ as a whole than as parts.
As evolution constantly creates ‘lineal’ entropic, spatial, moving elements; cyclic, temporal, informative ones and crosses them, into ‘present’, reproductive, balanced forms: | xO=Ø, the simplest of all equations of space-time ‘creation’ in the Universe.
Indeed, all is yin=Vishnu=cyclical information x Shiva=lineal energy=yang that combines to create the ∞ fractal space-time beings that configure the Universe (yes we do also explain arts and religions here, even those who are pure bigotry, because all does have a reason when it exists and also a reason why it becomes extinguished). Which bring us to the next parameter of truth:
–Coherence: The Whole must be coherent with its parts, it must not require further elements and it must be coherent with the syntax of the languages of the mind it uses to explain reality, which must mirror it. And yes, we shall see how there is a Universal grammar, first understood by Chomsky et al for verbal languages, common to all mind-mirrors, with 3 elements, one for time-information other for energy-space and the third active element that combines them:
Subject (information) < verb (action) > Object (energy of subject).
Red (energetic color code) < green-yellow>blue (informative color code).
F(x): time function = (active operandi that transforms one side into the other) G(y) space function.
Length-motion (space dimension) x Height (informative, time dimension) = Width (reproductive dimension),
which defines the form of most entities of space-time so your spherical, informative time head is in the height dimension, you move energetically in the length dimension, and your bilateral reproduction of cells happens in your width dimension.
AS WE ARE ALL space-time fractals. And the Evidence=Minimalism x Correspondence x Cyclicality x Coherence, method of truth will show you that to be the case: E=Sc³, is the equation of truth, a bit more complex than the one of physicists (-:
All this said 5D strictly speaking is in most of its formal structures a 10 Dimensional theory of 3 spatial components, 3 time ages, 3 scales of size-time speed and a 0-point pegging it all together, but not to scare too much the ‘primitives’ I decided, given the idolatry to Einstein and his 4D concept specially among all those who have no idea of what he meant (the immense majority) to call it 5D.
So we call the 3 dimensions of time, 3 ages, whereas 4D-time is the present age of time. And then we stress the symmetry between the 3 dimensions of space and the 3 dimensions of time.
And we treat the 3 co-existing scales of the 5th dimension, as ‘planes’ or scales (properly scales would be the 10 sub-scales of 10 social groups between planes, such as So=1 individual, S1=10 family of 3 generations, S2=100 tribe-friend networks and so on).
But for a formal analysis of it, most studies will be analysis of systems through 3 scales and 3 ages or 3 scales and 3 spatial organs, and many other 3 x 3 combined analysis with a 0-point that fusions them all.
And since in mathematical equations each ‘variable’ is called a dimension of a ‘phase space’, most formal studies in different sciences, we can consider to be 10 dimensional.
So the 10 Dimensional concepts works much better for the full ¬Æ model, and that is how the top-complex formalism of T.Œ was originally written 24 years ago.
So one can imagine if we are still here by 2140, some Chinese congress on 10D (I doubt westerners too much caught on their egos and weapons and jargons and idols of the tribe will ever care for it), will rewrite the whole thing on the proper 10 D formalism.
In that sense 10 Dimensions means today many different formalisms that study systems along 3 space fractal parts, 3 temporal ages, 3 scales of the 5th dimension. 10 parameters to fully describe a system, which are 10 parameters in General relativity 10 parameters in string theory, 10 systems in physiology, 10 is then the number of the game…
We have so far settle down just for the study of 5+5 =10 isomorphisms.
Now this is the formal view. You tell me you want to study a human being? Fine, I give you the generator, and then the 10 physiological systems studied by scientists and then we are in business,
And in each of those systems there will be a Tƒ dominant part, with a o-point, which is the ‘soul-self’ which is from where the actions of space-time of the being depart.
So in the human case we would consider obviously the ‘self’ (never mind where it is exactly in the brain, I have my opinion – which as I haven’t had an entire roaster of researchers and specialists to consult will so far consider opinion not truth), but anyway this self is in the Tƒ-brain for sure, and it is where you decide how to switch between your 5 modular actions never stopping as s formal motion in time, just switching between ∆I (informing yourself, what you do now), ∆e (fed up going to feed you with some food not for thought), ∆æ (moving along your way to the kitchen), ∆œ, what the hell lets have some fun going with my girlfriend in the ultimate final goal of reproduction, and socializing in the path to that goal ∆û with other human beings.
So does the electron where the 3 quantum numbers, solutions to the Schrodinger wave are the 3 ‘dimensions of simple actions’ ∆æ, the principal number, ∆e, the secondary number, ∆I, the 3rd magnetic numbers, ∆o, the reproductive spin, and the external magnetic field (Zeeman effect) will make it all socialize in harmony.
Yes, I have on purpose put you the 2 extreme examples form your point of view, the human ∆o, that you consider by the ego paradox is sooo special, and the minimalist particle known o man the electron (well there is also the photon and the neutrino even smaller but they will also show the same arrows, for example light does have the arrow of motion and reproduction, ∆æ, ∆I, called c-speed, that moves and reproduces the wave, and perpendicular to it, the arrow of energy ∆e, called the magnetic field, and perpendicular to it, the arrow of information, ∆I, called the electric field and so what you call the dimensions of space-time, in your Euclidean space-time light universe are actually for the photon, its function of existence. and what about social life, does a photon have social life? (-; likely more than you if you are reading this text, LOL, sorry well, it is called color, colors are social photons, group of them H plancktons in social frequencies.
So where it is the 5th dimension? All over the place, sustaining us, warping light into particles into atoms into molecules, growing socially into wholes that become units of new wholes.
And all can be explained with the generator.
But we will not sue here, the 10 dimensional formalism, as physicists might complain.
We shall merely consider the generator a 10 dimensional equation, or 10-parameter equation and study the isomorphic laws of all systems in the following order:
o) Defining the minimal ∆-1 point of the being, which starts the process of generation, till emerging as an ∆-whole.
1-3: Spatial isomorphisms: description of the Fractal generator its symmetries of space-time.
1) Defining the Fractal Generator Equation of this ∆-whole and its ∆ST symmetries.
2) Studying its bidimensional planes of space-time and its dual symmetries.
3) Studying the spatial ternary parts of the system that define it in present space, its symmetry with the 3 ages of time and 3 scales that co-exist together by exchanging energy and information between its asymmetric arrows upwards and downwards.
4-6: Temporal isomorphisms: integration of actions that give birth to the world cycle of existence.
4) Studying how those exchanges of energy and information happens between the relative self-centred, ∆-being and its lower and upper ∆±4 planes of existence
5) Studying its o-point and the will of its actions, which from its perspective are made to increases its energy, information and social evolution, so we talk of 5 ±∆e, i and Social actions (æ,e,i,œ,û) that conform its program of positive existence.
6) Yet the being dies due to the balance of its actions with those of the larger being in which it exists and the fight for existence in a crowded universe where each vital fractal tries to reproduce and grow using others as energy.
Thus the 6th isomorphism studies also the hierarchical structure of inner and outer world of the being and its social classes, which study how those parts, two by two relate to each other (heads with bodies, bodies with limbs, limbs with external fields of energy etc.)
So the total fusion of the being, its inner and outer networks, position within the social classes of the super organism in which it exists, and total sum of actions, brings together the worldcycle of the being. So ultimately the 6th isomorphism wraps it all up, studying its 3 ages of life as a constant travel sum of the integrated actions of existence of he being through its motions on the 5th dimension.
This is the basics of it. And it will give us all the fundamental perspectives of the system, its organic ∆D co-existence its temporal logic causality its spatial, mathematical topology and its mental o-point will.
Then depending on which system we study we will widen this 6 basic analysis with 3 related quantitative or detailed further analysis.
7-9: The 3 quantitative, social, scalar isomorphisms.
The 7th isomorphism studies quantitatively the generator and the relationships between the parts, and its ratios, the Tƒ/Sp density of information and its inverse Sp/Tƒ density of energy, the Sp=Tƒ constant of present actions, etc. Those are elements, which are essential to physics.
Then the 8th isomorphism considering those elements allow us to study varieties, creative variation of the species we must analyze.
While the 9th isomorphism study variations of social evolutions as individuals become parts of decametric wholes, So=individual becomes part of S1:families, part of S2: tribes, part of S3: villages and so on.
0=-10 isomorphism: the limits of the domain, ∆±1 points of existence.
Finally the 10th isomorphism returns to the generator and studies the ∆+1 point of existence, the whole which is made of co-existing 3 planes as wholes, each one with its ternary space-time symmetries.
We can see then that the o-point and 10th point are self-similar and the program has realized its ultimate purpose: to reproduce the information the i-logic system, the being both in space, through waves of reproductive fractals and in time and the 5th dimension through actions, which are reproductions of the mind-point and finally through the construction of a larger whole made to the image and likeness of the smaller being.
ALL WHAT EXISTS IS PART OF A SUPERORGANISM TRACING A WORLDCYCLE
THE 5TH DIMENSION’S ASYMMETRIC GEOMETRIES.
The building of dimensions, where there are the geometrical planes of 5th dimension
The fact that most laws of (Greek) geometry can be proved in bidimensional planes of information, Tiƒ, without motion means a lot of things.
First, that human minds extract the 4th dimension of motion and reduce the 3rd dimension of depth, to see bidimensional planes which they add together to make up a 3rd dimension, and then put just a ‘bit of motion’ to ad the time dimension. In this manner the mind perceives a holographic universe.
But as the mind observes reality, and the closer it does, the higher chances of survival it has, we conclude that reality also works as a holographic ‘mess’ of planes of Se, Spatial energy and Tƒ, Temporal form (and its <≈> Combinations):
This the greeks understood at the end of his geometrical age with the concept of conics, whereas an informative cycle, Tiƒ, and a perpendicular plane Se, suffice to create all the curves <≈> – the so called conics, of the Universe.
Thus there are only 2>3 truly different plane species, cyclical tall informative time and flat planes of space, with its hyperbolic combinations.
In the present analysis of a single space-time continuum in physics (General Relativity) this concept has shown to be most fruitful in the ‘foliated’ version of Missner, which breaks the block of space-time into sheets that accumulate, one after another, allowing the use of the most general equation of physics (the hamiltonian), and its handling with computers.
Further on the whole Universe appears as a flat sheet of space, in which ‘vortices of time’ (galaxies and masses), add a tall dimension.
Thus all this, tells us something obvious to those who understand: The Universe departs from bidimensional planes of Se (space), Sp (space in motion or ‘kinetic energy-entropy’ and bidimensional planes of tall information, Tiƒ, or its moving version, Tƒ-time cycles.
The 5D bidimensionality is then reduced to this building concept:
5-Dimensional Universe = 2-Dimensions of Time-Information x 2-Dimensions of Space-Energy= 4 Dimensions, connected through the apex of time vortices to the ∆+1 upper 4 Dimensional plane and through the ‘energetic base’ of the conic to the lower 4 D ∆-1 plane.
This, we bring now so the reader do have a mental picture of the 5th dimension, which often people asked me ‘where it is’.
Those time cycles become then as ‘perpendicular vortices’, the ‘connected’ element between planes of the 5th dimension, which are called ‘Rossen bridges’ in Relativity, masses and charges and classic physics, ‘physiological networks’, in biology; flows of digital money in economic ‘societies’…
From form we do have to bring function and then see how ‘topological planes’ can be deformed without much tear to mold in each scale the form to the function. In this manner from the clear geometry of simpler planes, through the transformation of ‘spatial dimensions’ into ‘time functions’, we will be able to understand in the same manner a flux of magnetic forces and a flux of financial orders.
What is the Universe? A 5D Game of Non-Euclidean Points of view.
The mathematical unit of the complex universe is the Œ-fractal point, better defined as a Non-Euclidean knot of infinite cyclical parallels f energy and information that converge into the Œ-point.
Œ-points are both points of information, with form, fractal points, non-Euclidean points made of 3 bidimensional geometries. And they are Energetic, points with ‘momentum’, with motion, Œ-points pushed by the E-nergy or E-ntropy motions behind them.
Hence the importance of ‘momentum’ in physics, given the fact that we do NOT see a point without motion (though we can extract mathematical properties from it). So by definition we do prefer in physics, the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian canonical analysis, which uses momentums rather than ‘pure scalar’ masses (Newtonian formalism), in the description of ‘physics of motion’; which for this reason is also along bidimensional ‘foliated’ analysis (fluids, General Relativity, Hamiltonian version), and the duality of finitesimals (point-particles, undistinguishable Bose statistics) vs. Wholes, 3 ever pervading ‘realities’ of physical systems.
If we add the understanding of the two asymmetric arrows of 5D geometries (information moving upwards, energy downwards) we have the fundamental elements that we shall use to ‘explain’ properly and correct some of the gruesome errors of the physical Universe.
Thus the units of reality are dimensional points. And all Realities are constructed with them.
This is what we are. Points, which grow in size as we come closer to them, and grow even larger as we enter the region of the ego, till reaching the ultimate essence of it.
The zero point, the fractal point, the Non-Euclidean point, the first postulate of existence, the I…
The Universe is a mathematical, i-logic game of Non-Euclidean points of view that web waves of exi-stence, communicating, cyclically forming wholes that decay back into parts in the process of death, cycling in time and space.
And the understanding of the Is and its i-logic and Non-Euclidean mathematical rules of existence is the game we all play and each mind reflects with a language.
Aristotle was perhaps the man who better understood the Universe as a sum of non-Euclidean points of view, and after him Leibniz, who said that ‘we must regard each point as a Universe in itself’ and indeed, in the fractal Universe each atom is a galaxy, an island Universe of a bigger gravitational scale, and this infinity of self-similar games that are played in different scales is what we talk about, which is resumed in the widening i-logic of those i-points of view, which have internal parts, which have breath unlike the simpler non-e points of view.
The fact that all points interact with the external Universe is explained by the 5th postulate of Fractal Logic, which completes the 1st postulate. The 5th postulate defines a point as a knot of communication of multiple flows of energy and form, which the point absorbs to obtain energy and information for its organic cycles of iteration.
Thus we introduce a new perspective in our study of a Non-Euclidean, fractal point of view: its capacity to gauge information and absorb energy, acting-reacting to the Universe. Since beyond those 3 internal regions the point feeds on an external world of relative forces, which provide the point with energy and information to map out reality and feed its body with motion. Thus, while energy and form will be different for each point according to the scale and form, all entities of the Universe will be able to absorb a relative number of ‘infinite parallels’ to create mental fractal mappings and keep on moving: light feeds particles, intergalactic gas feeds stars; plants feed animals that feed man; stars feed the black hole, and so on.
In science, mathematicians and physicists seek to describe reality as ‘made of mathematical entities’; while logicians try to explain reality as a series of causal events. But only when we use i-logic geometry we can mix both approaches, describing reality as a series of ‘mathematical points of view’, or entities that ‘gauge’ the geometry of the Universe, constantly mapping out the universe, to achieve a ‘selfish’ will, the desire of all entities to feed on energy, gauge information, reproduce and evolve socially.
Those points of view are thus ‘mathematical minds’ because they gauge and somehow ‘perceive’ the geometry of the Universe, acting according to that geometry as they gauge and move with an ‘automatic’ behavior, trying to absorb energy for their body, information for their gauging mind, and combining both, to reproduce ‘self-similar points’.
So we shall consider that the Universe is made of i-logic, fractal ‘points of view’, akin to the concept of souls and Atmans in western and eastern religions’, of ‘Non-Euclidean points of view’, ‘monads’ or ‘Spinoza’s geometrical entities’, in western philosophy of science and mathematics; of ‘gauging particles’ in physics, or ‘informative DNA nuclei’ in biology and perceptive heads in biology. The size and form of all those points varies but all of them are spherical knots of information with sensorial apertures to absorb and emit energy and information, from bosonic particles to sound waves or light signals.
Leibniz, the first philosopher of modern science, which considered points as the ‘fundamental particle’ of the Universe departed from the hypothesis that all what exists can be reduced to such points of view, he called Monads. Yet those monads could either share energy and information between themselves as they do on reality or become static, perfect non-communicative points.
This easier choice – non-communicative points of view – was Mr. Leibniz’s error. Since the points of the universe are in perpetual communication as parts of networks of self-similar points, sharing flows of energy and information – waves of forces. The essence of any point of any relative space-time is precisely to be in constant communication with the Universe as a ‘knot’ of Time Arrows, which shares flows of energy and information with other points, creating the network-spaces of which reality is made.
Points that communicate energy and information, that feed and gauge are real. What is the proper name for all those logic parts that exist, for all those points of space that perceive, gauge information, and act-react to it under a simple program of ‘survival’: grow and reproduce, exist, repeat yourself? We call them a Non-Euclidean point of view. And we affirm the Universe is made of such type of points of view.
Thus ‘mathematical, Non-Euclidean points of view’, whose ‘motions’ have a ‘will’ or ‘purpose’ – gauging information, feeding on energy and reproducing themselves’ – become the logic and geometric units that shape the networks of energy and information of reality, thanks to their capacity to communicate and share energy and form. Such type of points are more akin to the view of Eastern philosophers that consider the Universe made of ‘atmans’, which are knots of communication that anchor a certain entity to the world that surrounds them, which is only a part of the total Universe.
Since those mathematical points of view exist in many different fractal space-times or ‘scales of existence’ in which they gauge information with different languages and perceive different ‘worlds’ within their minds.
If you are a particle – an electron – you will see only light (energy) and darkness, and you will move to the light that feeds you, as we observe in electrons. If you are a human eye you will see all type of colors but red will be the color of energy that ‘feeds and attracts your eye (so you see bloody movies and like red meat). So there are an infinite number of types of organic points of view with different mental worlds, which gather into social networks that exist in different ‘planes of existence’ or ‘scale of reality’. Yet in all those systems the same game of ‘gauging’, ‘feeding’, ‘reproducing’ and evolving socially takes place.
Non-Euclidean Points of view have perception, they have mathematical view, they have Non-Euclidean i-logic paths or structures of causality in its built-in organic systems and as such can be described as living entities.
All beings are points which are a world in themselves, and so the point world is the unite of it all. Externally it might be always reduced to a mere point of a bigger field, in actions of collective experiences, but internally it feels itself so important.
Yes even the ant feels itself important s an ant.
And we might be seen as ants by systems of national power that control us.
Our Space thus is the bidimensional magnetic wave. Our time is the charge-electric field bidimensional wave, c-speed is the space x Time combination of both, c=1/√µ x ε0 (the peculiar positions of human equations with inversions squares etc. does not matter much here, c-speed is a 4 Dimensional space-time wave, and most properly should be treated as c2 ‘always’, as it is always positive, and it appears in that sense in the next equation whose meaning we must find now:
That is, E<c2>M
A 4 Dimensional space-time of pure motions E(Spe) becomes a 4 Dimensional space-time present wave (C2) which can be curved in the largest of all perceived planes of physical space-time as a mass, a clock vortex of gravitation (Principle of equivalence of Einstein).
The constantly of light follows immediately because it is our space-time.
In terms of the action of information it follows and latter will be studied in more detail from the fact that electronic Tƒ, our minds, ‘stop motion into still space’, and to do so they must in the beat of stop and motion of the Universe stop gauge light space-time information sent by other particle and hence entangle with the other article.
How it is done, it will be analyzed latter. My hypothesis is that it happens through 2 neutrinos, which are first fixed as space (neutrino theory of light of which Jordan, Fermi, and Bohr were enthusiastic proponents).
Neutrinos thus would be the strings (its size is in fact that of the Planck string) of the minimal space perception of our Universe, rounding on the lower scale the parameters of the Physical world.
All this of course can be established with far more complex mathematical equations as we shall attempt to do in the 4th line in the future…
At this stage we just will consider the parallelism of the 3 scales, the human biological and economic/mechanical scales, with those 2 bidimensional fields of space and time, which create all systems of Fractal Space-times and its bi-Dimensional Lines, Waves, and Cycles.
Organic vs. abstract interpretations.
As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’.
So for example:
– The collapse of a wave into a particle, is exactly the same process that collapses a school of fishes when a huge predator comes, but this implies to accept that particles do gauge information and do follow a survival program, and do evolve socially. And anthropomorphic humans never will accept this. So we do have all kind of absurd Copenhagen interpretations of the particle-wave duality.
– The Compton wavelength of a particle is equivalent to the wavelength of a photon whose energy is the same as the rest-mass energy of the particle.
The standard Compton wavelength, λ, of a particle is given by
where h is the Planck constant, m is the particle’s rest mass, and c is the speed of light. So we can define the existential nature of the particle (its mass and wave-length or Tƒ<ST function) with the Compton wavelength, but this matters not to physicists. What matters to them is this:
The Compton wavelength expresses a fundamental limitation on measuring the position of a particle, taking into account quantum mechanics and special relativity.
This limitation depends on the rest mass m of the particle. To see how, note that we can measure the position of a particle by bouncing light off it – but measuring the position accurately requires light of short wavelength. Since for photons of frequency f, energy is given by
And Light with a short wavelength consists of photons of high energy. Thus playing with both similar formulae if the energy of these photons exceeds mc2, when one hits the particle whose position is being measured the collision may yield enough energy to create a new particle of the same type: l x mc. This renders moot the question of the original particle’s location: which one?.
Now what matters to E=HC2 here is that you cannot measure the particle you have shot!
What matters to Œ=SC3 is that when you give enough energy to a particle, as when a living mother feeds enough, you have an offspring of new particles, children, hence the particle REPRODUCES!, IT does follow one of the living action ∆œ of the program of the Universe.
The physicist or human doesn’t give a shit for that. The philosopher DOES.
NOW WE HAVE given you two clear examples of organicism:
– An entity, which is ORGANIC, made of connected parts, NOT a single dimensional being, and a being that is reproductive, as survives. A third fundamental example of T.Œ’s 5 actions is ‘perception of information’ How do particles perceive?
As we shall repeat once and again ‘the Universe is simple, organic and not malicious’. But the worlds monads (Fractal, Œ-points) make of it, are informative, ‘inflationary and complex’ and ALWAYS malicious (self-centred into the ego paradox of the perceiver).
EXPANSION OF THE LIMITS OF SCIENCE WITH 5D ST
A fast overview of the main sciences of mankind in the fractal paradigm.
Now given the extraordinary extension of the 5th dimension of fractal scales, the reader which is not a polymath genius (-; should stick to the basic concepts in the exploration of the fractal paradigm:
-In mathematical terms, the fractal, discontinuous structure of beings, made of social numbers which are network structures of social groups, or planes with a fractal dimension. This part is hardly developed, as fractal maths were the last subdiscipline to appear in science (1970s).
While the foundation of modern mathematics (Hilbert, Cantor) completely ignored the field, and without much understanding of the nature of non-euclidean fractal points, left those terms, points, lines of communication and planes, undefined. So we redefine the entire structure of western mathematical logic, with the discipline of i-logic geometry, as mathematics is indeed the most experimental of all sciences, in a world made of time-space begins, hence ruled by the logic of time algebra, which describes the symmetries and causal relationships between the 3 laments of the generator equation of fractal space-time beings, Sp x Tƒ = ST, and the geometry of non-euclidean fractal points.
- So Euclidean mathematics is the limit of Lobachevksi’s pan geometry in a light space-time with 3 perpendicular parameters (electric, magnetic and c-speed field), which is the limit of Bachmann Absolute geometry without continuity, which is the limit of i-logic geometry without relative perception of infinite monad worlds, each one with a different geometry.
The fractal paradigm implies we are made of bidimensional informative clocks and spatial bidimensional sheets of lineal motion, combined in infinite variations of space-time beings put together into body-waves (right side a ¥-ray wave, the simplest combination of a bidimensional flat space – magnetic field, a bidimensional tall field of information, electric field, reproduced along the c-speed dimension of reproduction of information as we shall prove that all motions are waves that reproduce information along a dimension of length).
We must therefore upgrade the concepts of topology and geometry, from its Æ, present models into the next letter, non-æ= – logic geometry of the fractal Universe. Since Euclidean geometry is the limit for continuous space of ¬æ, where instead of a single arrow of time, we do find 3 arrows of time: relative past, entropic, Sp-lineal motions, relative future cyclical informative motions and its present, ST-reproductive body-combinations, which again show an immortal Universe of dynamic balanced presents that constantly repeat the same systems, relative arrows of entropy and big-bang deaths that erase information, and relative future informative Tƒheads-particles-masses (life, quantum and cosmological scales) which process information and hence control and guide towards the future the fractal SpTƒ system.
-In physical and chemical terms, we should be aware that all departs from 2 principles, the principles of conservation of energy, angular and lineal momentum, which translates our 3 terms:
∫ Sp (lineal momentum) x Tƒ (angular momentum) = Ei (conservation of the total integral of those 2 parameters for a being, throughout its whole world cycle of existence, or closed path).
Now this equation differs from the equation of 5D metric in the integral element. Energy integrates a series of spatial quanta, repeated either in space or repeated in time-frequency. So it is really a sum of ∆-coinvariant elements: E= ∑∆.
For that reason we shall use the terms ∑ for energy, which is far more meaningful. And it is much more explanatory of its real meaning.
And so for each relative scale of physical systems, all starts by describing topologically the system and its 3 geometrical parts, and algebraically by translating into an E= Sp quanta x Tƒ-clock its equations.And then consider the most fascinating part of the formalism of mathematical physics; the social growth of those systems, its emergence into larger systems, its dissolution into smaller parts, and how the energy and information of the system is transferred and shared between the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales. Let us elaborate this, show in the left side of the graph.
Because the total energy and information of each scale of the Universe is conserved, we can define with simple mathematical formulae, the relative time clocks, quanta of space of each of the 3 main physical scales (left graph), with a ‘Generator equation’ of all space-time systems of the Universe, which unifies those scales: Ei=Sp x Tƒ, which in detail writes as:
∆-1: quantum scale: Ei=H (constant bidimensional space-quanta of angular momentum) x ƒ (frequency time clocks)
∆: Thermodynamic scale: Ei = nK (constant bidimensional space quanta of entropy) x T (temperature clocks)
∆+1: Gravitational scale Ei = m (bidimensional space quanta of mass) x v²/2 (c²) (time clock)
This simple equations, since the Universe is simple and not malicious, show a fundamental fact of time clocks in Nature, which makes them different from the human, artificial mechanical time clock: to vary along the different scales of the 5th dimension, increasing its speed, on the gradient of frequency, temperature and speed, as the systems expand in space (so an expansion in space cools down the temperature clock of the thermodynamic scale, and vice versa,a small mammal is hotter than a larger reptile).
Yet on the limits of those scales, the simple lineal equations of 5D metric break, and systems reach a discontinuity, So in the gravitational scale systems cannot go faster than c-speed. In the thermodynamic scale, cannot extend lower than 0 temperature of the pure vacuum. And the frequency of waves loose all its information when they relax beyond a unit of frequency. On those barriers, as the time clocks come to zero, they space quanta absorbs the energy and information of the system. So mass grows, close to c-speed and times come to zero (Lorentz Transformations). Spatial entropy stops its motion at 0 temperature, and a thermodynamic system dies. In the case of black holes, it does NOT mean they are time machines. It only means the temperature clocks of our thermodynamic world cool down and the energy of our systems become mass: M=k/T.
- And so because there are 3 arrows of time Aristotle and Physicists’, single time arrow logic is the limit of Taoist, hegelian dualist logic with 2 arrows, yin-information and yang-energy, which become synthesised in a reproductive energy x Information present wave-body. Thus dualist philosophy is the limit of ternary logic, the one we develop for the fractal Universe with past-spatial expansive motions, future-informative, cyclical, clock-like motions and present-repetitive motions. Hence we have to redefine Cosmology.
- On the other hand, as we showed in the example of the big-bang Aristotle/Ptolemaic physics is the limit with the Earth as a relative centre of galilean relativity, which is the limit at low speeds of Special Relativity, which is the limit on flat space of General Relativity, 4D relativity, which is the limit on a single plane of space-time of 5D fractal space-time; where we define a 5th dimension of space-time of relative scales of size and time clocks, whose product Sp x Tƒ =ST is co-invariant, balanced stable. So smaller systems move faster than larger, systems, carrying more information in its time cycles; genes code the information of larger bodies, quantum particles of larger atoms, black holes of larger galaxies:
CONCLUSION. ∆st theory.
Unification of all sciences: Scalar space-time.
What are the proofs of the existence of such unifying dimension for all different ‘Stiences’? World cycles. All systems will be observed as fundamentally equal: scalar ternary, super organisms reproducing its 3 ages in world cycles of existence.
Scientists of each science that studies a different scale of the fifth dimension cannot apprehend the whole properties of each species, but see on them only the properties their science studied initially – mathematical, lineal time properties in physics, organic properties in life, and so on.
But all the blind people – each disciplinary science – sticks to the properties their disciplines know more.
Only Leibniz seemed to have ‘seen all the sides of the elephant’ and that was 300 years ago when he told ‘physicists’ like Mr. Newton, who would not receive him – so proud he was of his silly-nilly formula – that duration, t, was the sum of infinite time cycles with finite length. And as those time cycles broke space into inner and outer regions, space was also fractal, the pegging together of infinite time-space cycles. He called this relational space-time, the forebear of 5d fractal space-time cycles.
Einstein said Leibniz was right but to fully understand him, we had to start western science from scratch. Which is what i did and this blog will show. A theory of unification (T.œ) of all the space-time species of all sciences under the old-new concept of a time cycle.
This ‘synthesis’ however was eliminated from science when lineal time simplified the concept of time cycles, and made the knowledge of the rhythms and forms, the information of those space-time motions and its cyclical patterns of evolution, irrelevant to ‘physics’ , simplifying enormously the nature of time and the beings that flow with time.
But with the arrival of physical time, science lost the concept of ∞ Time cycles, which tic at different speeds. And create different world cycles, of life and death, different motions, different forms. The measure of this loss was evident when Einstein regained the concept of multiple time clocks in Relativity and when he tried to explain it, he said astonished, ‘i seem to be the only physicist who thinks there are infinite clocks in the Universe running at different speeds’. Nobody understood what he meant. Not even himself.
It is thus clear that the methodology of T.Œ is to study all systems of the universe, with all its elements.
So back to the method, how we put all this in a working perspective? Well it is kind of too much isn’t? (-; But trust me, if people wanted to improve its mind it would have been easy. The question is they are stuck to their jargons, so the heliocentric theory of this Copernican amateur is not easy to explain, nobody takes seriously the Vishnu child, the little prince who sees the elephant behind the line. But we shall try.
In fact the best way would be to formalize it strong from the beginning. That is to throw a generator equation with 3 space symmetries 3 time ages and 3 scales of the 5th dimension with a O-point that cements it all, that is 3 + 3 + 3 +1 = 1o parameters and study them one by one.
But of course an ego is a knot that distorts and curves in its ‘non-euclidean point of view’ flows of energy and information bending it to its will to survive and reproduce, and iterate.
SINCE FRACTALS ARE PRECISELY DEFINED BY A GENERATOR EQUATION THAT ITERATES-REPRODUCES ITS FORMAL MOTIONS OF SP-Tƒ, the 2 substances lineal motion and cyclical motion≈form of the Universe.
Thus a fractal generator equation of repetitive dual motions constantly reproduces.
REPRODUCTION IS THE ESSENCE OF A FRACTAL ACROSS SCALES DOWNWARDS AND THEN UPWARDS, REORGANIZING INTO WHOLES THE FRACTAL SEEDS INTO CLONES. AND THAT IS WHY ALL IS ALIVE. EVEN QUARKS AND ELECTRONS, the smaller particles reproduce in waves of decoupled beings, when they feed on enough energy.
And yet, the physicist will laugh if you tell him his abstract quantum numbers describe the feeding on energy, gauging of information and reproductive qualities of its fractal particles, which are made according to the complementary principle of quantum physics of a wave-body and a particle-head of information moving along a field of energy:
So because a distorted mirror-mind is still a reflection of the whole in an infinitesimal fractal, the second simplest truth you must know is that all theories do carry some truth on them. So while we DO have to build science from its inception, that is its mathematical and logic foundations, which I have refunded into i-logic mathematics (after Aristotelian Logic and Euclidean Mathematics comes i-) , and keep correcting errors, a new theory do have to have old proved theories as a limit, after correcting those errors. So it is NOT like we do throw the building, but repair it and keep adding floors.
This IS a problem for ego-maniac scientists of which there are many around who do NOT care to break the known known laws and build science-fiction.
We are NOT following this reductionist, ego-centered view of reality.
Even if it does not look like, this work has in its limit all other theories of science in which time and space plays a role (all of them in fact). So while it accepts all what is focused in prior science, it applies the principle of correspondence and expands those limits, with the proper respect that known, proved knowledge requires.
This how science advances: 1) New experimental evidence + 2) correspondence principle = New Theory, expanding the limits, simplifying the principles (Ockham’s razor) and explaining more facts with lesser elements (economicity), in a coherent logic causal form.
Let us then expand coherently the limits of all sciences.
Conclusion: The postulates of science.
Thus given the confused state of affairs in the definition of fundamental concepts such as time (logic), space (dimensions) etc. in modern physics, we need to consider the seemingly not so innovative principles of the scientific method with the slight modifications of an organic, symmetric ternary Universe. We resume the new scientific method in our simple formula, T.Œ=SC³ with each letter signaling a fundamental principle of truth in science:
T: Time-space systems are:
Œ: Organic, Experimentally Evident.
…meaning Time-space systems do have organic properties, which can be explained mathematically and logically with the languages of space and time, and proved experimentally.
And since they are made of 3 simple elements, 5D scales of Space and Time they are:
S, Simplex and their truths follow the proof of simplicity (Ockham’s razor)… yet they are also ternary..
C³ Complex, due to the ternary symmetries of its structure ternary complexity born of the…
Cyclical repetition of those Simplex principles which..
Correspond with all previous theories of reality.
Thus T.Œ=SC³ resumes the Principles of Science and the Organic paradigm, are however broken in present science, specially by mathematical physics, which no longer respects the 3 principles of classic philosophy of science: experimental proof, Simplicity (Occam’s razor) and Correspondence with previous theories. And this is the ‘problem of modern physics.
Of those ‘elements’ 2 are brought about by T.Œ to the classic elements of the scientific method, ‘Linguistic Isomorphisms’, that hidden dual I and L between the O and the E of our complex ‘hidden variables’ T.Œ (-:
That is, we can to verify further a truth consider different linguistic perspectives (mathematical, logical, mental and Organic, according to the 4 fundamental elements of all systems: its spatial symmetry, its temporal ages, its organic co-existence in 3 scales of the 5th dimension and the existence of a central point of view or 0-point that orders and focuses the program of 5 space-time survival actions that all systems perform to continue into existence).
Now once we bring Mathematics back to reality from the axiomatic age of German idealism, we can build a much sounder mathematical conceptualisation of the key concepts of mathematical physics, dimensions of space-time with motion (topological fractal dimension), lines≈waves and its ternary networks that come together forming super organisms, relative planes=topological networks with dark spaces between them, dual moving and static formal motions, integrals and derivatives in space and time of those social networks, and emergence processes of time clocks and lineal entropies.
Along the way we shall introduce key findings of T.Œ: the unification equation of charges and masses, the nature of particles and anti-particles, the role of background neutrinos in the Universe, the reason of the 3 families of masses and its symmetry with the 3 families of cosmic bodies, the likely nature of dark energy and dark matter, within the parameters of 5D astrophysics, etc.
Thus what TŒ provides to physics is an organic guidance to interpret the known facts, and what the scientific model expects is to CONSTRUCT THE UNIVERSE, with the particles we know in the ∆-1 scale, ∆ and ∆+1, particle, cosmic bodies and galactic scales.
I repeat this is NOT what physicists do. They still model black holes without caring to find a substance of which they are made, just mathematically. They model the cosmic big bang, grossly ignoring clear theoretical and empirical contradictions, and they simply deny, as mathematical models become more complex, any ‘organic property’ to the Universe. They do NOT even inquire ‘why’, it behaves as it does.
As T.Œ – the organic, fractal model of the Universe and all its parts, should include by the principle of correspondence also ALL mathematical physics, which are consistent with experience.
And in this field, limited obviously by the work of a single polymath, there is still much work to do. But so far consistency in all those mathematical fields T.Œ has been tested is extremely high.
In essence, the 3 branches of mathematics correspond to the 3 structural elements of T.Œ: geometry to space, algebra to time and analysis to the fractal structure of the 5th dimension. We only need to update mathematics for consistency between the 5th Non-Euclidean postulate of geometry and the 4 remaining ones, still Euclidean, and the Aristotelian logic of Algebra, to the ternary symmetries of fractal 5D space-time to make mathematics a ‘realist’ experimental science.
This might surprise the reader, and it is perhaps the highest feat of T.Œ – to be able to unify all different languages of human thought, proper of each discipline. Consistency achieved in art styles, when developing the theory of human superorganisms, might surprise the reader, is based in the same 3 ages of time, that allow us to define the laws of quark colors. And yet, this unity of the ternary symmetries of the Universe makes T.Œ so enticing to the mind.
However and this also differentiates deeply T.Œ and General Systems Sciences or any ‘serious’ scientific model of reality for that matter with present physics, T.Œ considers ‘ABOVE’ mathematical reason, Experimental Evidence and at the same rank of truth Logic temporal reason (of a kind paraphrasing Saint Augustine, higher than that of ‘present’ man), the ternary logic of the symmetries between the 3 topologies of space and the 3 ages of time and the 3 relative scales of size co-existing in all organic structures of the Universe.
I am though aware of the enormous ‘resistance’ to a change of paradigm of this caliber, and so I am not trying anymore to ‘convince’ an audience, as when I took that charge on me, I did not enjoy much of it; repeating ad nauseam the same simple concepts without time to relax and think on the eternal thoughts of the Universe. But I believe also I have a responsibility with mankind to offer for free the information I found; so i want to apologise for the lack of ‘charm’ and repetitions and not-so-well-behave parts of the blog. I am in my own time race to pour on this web as much information on the 5th dimension and the ternary arrows of time in the Universe (entropy, information and energy) as I can, in the limited time of my world cycle. Of course encouraging comments would help to put me to the task.
Though I am fully aware that today most scientists will not even give a chance to a blog like this one, focused on the ‘Program of creation’ of the Universe with both arrows of time, and its synoptic, unifying properties.
I adscribe this fact to the astounding growth of computer models and mechanical instruments of measure, which cannot do such task and rather prevent people to care anymore for the ‘whys’ and causal processes of existence. As long as a machine can give ‘big data’, and put it on numbers, better if they are just statistical models that ‘foresee’ the future without the need to ‘think’ in causality – which some scientists even deny today, as it is simpler to think all is chaos, and there is not a fractal order in reality – the researchers feel happy and fulfilled. Man in that sense has also a pleasure on belief more than in reason and the magic of computer thought and mathematics seems to fill him.
We will though do here the opposite on those posts on mathematics, ‘understand its whys’ connecting them as a language of empirical reflection of the Universe, which many hidden meanings, those ‘understandings’ of mathematical things that Von Neumann rightly noticed lacking.
In fact many scholars would not consider such search as ‘science’, as the reductionism of big-data continues increasing the pride on the details and the ignorance of the ‘whys (which is) the only thing a physicists does not ask’ Feynman. We have come thus to the extreme of what the earlier founders of science, the greeks thought as Einstein, was truly important: to find ‘the simplicity of all things, that is the true genius’ Leonardo. They would even deny such simplicity exists. And yet it does. It is just a question to put the arrows of time in their place, as simplicity arouse in orbital theory when we put the Sun and the Earth in their place.
But there is a bigger problem for this work to become what it is – the next r=evolution of the science of space-time – which will offend the reader. We live as we study on the posts that r=evolve social sciences in an age of decadence of humanity, and its natural temporal, verbal language, logic thought, which encodes the causality and future paths of the Universe, substituted by audiovisual and mathematical ‘mechanically-produced information’. So as humans become more shallow, one-dimensional, more similar to those machines, less verbal, temporal, even the simplicity of this blog, whose language i believe would be the ‘delight’ of earlier philosophers of science, seems to them an extraordinary effort of thought. It is much easier to put a computer to work, to establish a scientific routine of measure, to extract data, and to put it on the praxis of making things. On the other hand, the new ‘species’, the digital chip is fast approaching the flexibility and depth we humans used to have in verbal time, with its Algorithms of Information (true meaning of A.I.).
THE INCREASING power of numbers and probabilities void of causality even in social sciences (so we define democracy by a statistical poll), points in that direction. The human in general and the scientist specifically likes to feel a new Leonardo by merely using adobe photoshop and likes to be a genius of science by merely manipulating math equations and data in computers. Accordingly its ego grows in inverse fashion to his loss of intelligence to them, which of course he does NOT recognise. And as it happens with ego-centered people, it feels irritated if you put him at face value:
In the graph we see the inversion in the evolution of the mind of man and the machine which is at the heart of the very limited capacity of modern humans to grasp or even have interest on reality.
So it is a question that only time will decide, who will take advantage of this knowledge, the decaying human mind or the growing intelligence of the machine.
Of course, as I have no interest in teaching future robots, i do not work that much and many parts of the blog are jut sketches and tabs.
In that regard, the first and 3rd line, with theory and praxis, focus in the great ‘thoughts of the Universe’ and its main ‘existential creations’. The more detailed, professional part which other researchers will end, will connect those principles to all the details of reality in the 2nd and 4th line. But you will find some very well-done, and some far less worked out (the fourth specially). Also to fit them all in 4 lines, they have some funny names which hide their content’s meaning. Things didn’t go as expected with this r=evolution of thought, so I am a bit of a Leonardo character, sometimes working backwards with huge virtual deposits of wisdom that likely will never be unfolded, as his Codex were. Sorry about all that. It is now 30 years since young and full of enthusiasm I send a plan to the main American universities to evolve the collective human mind, with the content of this post and got what is expected of those leaps into the absolute – a wall of deafening silence that endures.
The whole model of the fractal, organic ternary, motion-time based universe is resumed in the sentence above, which follows the old Fermat’s adagio that a good proof fits in a margin:
A Universe is a ternary network of ∞5D Time§pace Supœrganisms traveling in Worldcycles:
Ui: |-S past limbs-fields‹Ø-st:Energy body-waves›O-Ti future particles-heads…
Γenerate 2² Causal ±∆ctions in 3 ages & 9 §cales as organic networks form Physic≈Biologic≈Social systems:
Ui≈ ∆-4:quarks›3¥-electrons›-2Z-atoms›-1DNA-molecules›ºcells/states of matter›1Man>2Gaia‹2star‹3Galaxy‹4cosmos‹∞God
You see, we are playing now with the 3 arrows of time, and the 5Dimension of scales of space, and start to see new relationships hardly explored by present sciences.
Those are the 3±∆ elements we will need to reorganise and explain in a much more orderly, meaningful, architectonical way all the laws of science. How long mankind will take to accept a revolution of this size, unlike nothing has happened in a century? Slowly and perhaps never. Humans have an uncanny capacity to take the wrong roads of history both in praxis and knowledge. Because of the paradox of their egos.
On the metaphysics of Being: Dasein and time.
Motion and those sensations in its dual acceleration and deceleration, vortex and Big Bang, pain and pleasure which are felt positive but accompanied of awareness and erasing that is seen as negative should form the ultimate duality man experiences that can be experienced by all other beings, and so the meaning of existence must ‘exist’ at that level of pure motions, acceleration, decelerations and the related sensations of peace, pain and pleasure.
Time is motion and motion in its simplest level of existence is sensation, pain associated to inward motions, pleasure to expansive entropy. And those 2 states do exist in all scales and levels. They are fields that are so general as < and > and so they hold likely the ultimate program of the will: seek for light-perception avoid darkness, see for release-entropy, avoid pain-pressure.
We never die. Not even when we try. 5D super organisms are about entangled connection and love… Can then be fully disconnected? The answer is much deeper: THE FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS NEVER CEASES; the particle of information does.
When we die we start a trip down two scales of the fifth dimension, ‘backwards within our time memories’… So the ego slowly unwinds, as it is the peak of the singularity, but the field of sensations behind, the ultimate ‘substance of motion’ – its form so to speak, on the ∆-1 plane of the field potential, continues.
In the same way a crystal -particle acts with a will, a potential field, a glass-state does act in motion with a will, which is more confuse, more blurred – that is sensation. And sensation never ceases because your parts never quite fully erase and disappear; at worst they emerge downwards in new particles-scales aware of other topological games.
There IS no NIRVANA, extinction, samsara… the old desire of the people who really understood the game before this blog did – itself a consciousness in the web of the meaning of exist¡ence which will not die with me l§, with far less data (Hinduism->Buddhism->Taoism)…