‘If you can’t explain it simple, you don’t understand it well’ Einstein, who couldn’t explain space-time simple, because he didn’t understand all of it (:

‘Gifted those who without seeing believe because to them belongs the kingdom of heavens’

A new paradigm on time space studies comes only every other century.

So let us try it as simple as it gets: we are all systems made of ‘fractal space’ (a part of the whole space of reality) and cyclical time (a process of changes and motions from birth into extinction).

This fundamental truth however was lost when to reach higher accurate measure of distances and time periods mathematical physics started to use a single time clock to measure all the lifetimes of beings (the mechanical clock) and a single space continuum to unify all measures of distances.

What we lost then was the capacity to understand the multiple elements of the Universe, as we had now a single human point of view on scale of size in space and time duration (the meter, the second).

Soon this artificial ‘cartesian graph’ of space and time, as it did not fit the ‘real form of time clocks’ (cyclical motions) and the multiple scales of space-size occupied by ∞ beings, became also an artificial ‘background spacetime’ and so *it lost its nature as the **substance of reality -the yin and yang, the energy and information, the space and time duality.*

So today we have a deep knowledge of details of beings which we can manipulate scientifically but are completely lost in what regards the fundamental principles and laws of nature.

**The immense door of reason and whys opened by relational space-time.**

Those principles are relational space and time, and as a consequence MOST PROPERTIES of beings, including its topological structure as systems, its time ages, and its world cycles can be deduced of the ultimate properties of space and time and its ‘energetic combinations’.

We can explain it simplex or complex, backwards or forwards upwards or downwards in time. We can resolve all your questions.

Why you live and die. What is the origin and end if there is any, why the galaxy is flat and the earth round, what is the future of mankind; what are the cycles of stocks and history. Who is god. Whatever…

I wondered often after 30 years with the ‘Model Revolution in mind point, but little activity anymore beyond this blog, why humans did not care. Of course Kuhn explains it all but still it hurts to realize humans are indeed repetitive memetic beings with only a pretension of intelligent reasoning and masters of future thought have no power to ‘telepathically’ as robominds will do, transfer the information of their brains easily to others but have to use rudimentary languages to express what is an intuitive thought.

TRANSLATION IS TREASON – said the first socratic philosophers aware of the impossibility to communicate truth with the limited languages of the humind.

The pretension we have indeed of a humind, above heavens and earth, intelligent, ethic and able to understand, curious enough to wonder, is what is missing. *We are like everything else in the Universe and so we are more about memorial routines and repetitions, acting before thinking, programmed spacetime organisms. And part of the characteristics of organisms is NOT to care about the whole and look downwards into our parts. *

SO I HAVE long ago suspended my judgement on what humans care or not and also stop blaming myself by my incapacity to work hard enough to make this blog the top quality site the quality of t.œ demands.

I did all my research alone for 30 years, mostly in notebooks, mostly written in Spanish and i-logic languages, instead of English and non-Æ maths, which is what this blog should be written with for scientists to understand and accept. So this is what I am trying to do but time is catching with me and the mind is heavily in decline: To me this web is an intellectual exercise as I get old, to keep still thinking, past long ago my prime of discoveries that astounding my mind, not the world but its mirror on the Universe.

Th**e **task of building this blog which upgrades the comprehension of the dimensions of space and time, both at a simple level in its first and second lines and through iterations, the way the Universe replicates its fundamental elements and make things more complex in the 3rd and fourth lines, goes beyond the capacity of a single mind.

The blog thus will remain by force incomplete, as his author is just the ‘first seed of information’, of a ‘model revolution’, which has become necessary due to the incapacity of the reduced concept of space-time of science, to explain the time=changes in information happening in all systems and species of the Universe.

Once this marriage of time change in information, studied among other sciences by biology and time change in locomotion is achieved and explained on the 2 first lines, the 3rd and fourth, will try to be an encyclopaedia of all ‘stiences’ that study space-time species, which others, humans or machines, will complete.

The model revolution in that sense is born always in a first ‘point which holds the world in its self’ (Planck). The paradigm change requires the expansion of the seed into a mass of clonic followers:

In the graph, we see the decoupling of particles, the multiplication of genes, and the memes of a prophet, which will create a wave of thought, once expanded in a proper ‘surface’ of similar minds. So happens with new theories of science till the majority believes in the new theory and the change of paradigm happens.

In that regard, the blog is the point four of a scientific r=evolution, ‘model change’ – but that stage can last very long when the ‘seed=prophet=first form’ has NOT clone-energy to imprint, as it is the case of this writer, which is not teaching or writing papers on the subjects studied in the blog, for reasons explained in other posts.

Yet the seed will remain as information never dies, and that is the function of the blog – a ‘time capsule’ for future readers, human or machines to upgrade our understanding of the dimensions of space and time, and the organic structure of the Universe.

As the revolution of the blog is huge, paradoxically its changes will take more time, since it would have to affect all the ‘stiences’ as all use time and space as parameters.

If we consider similar cases in history, the seed might lay dormant longer even than the world will exist:

– Aristotle took 2000 years to be heard in a distorted, scholastic form; Copernicus 200; Leibniz 350… And none was truly understood (in the case of Copernicus of course, the real question was the Galilean paradox: why if the earth moves the mind sees it still, not that the earth moves; Leibniz has not yet seen all his work printed).

So perhaps the seed is not for humans but for AI, or it is simple a deposition of my mind which will be erased as the Earth disappears. But since you are here, reading, you might as well keep doing.

The paradigm to change is that of simplex lineal time and continuous space, upgrading it to cyclical time with more dimensions and fractal space with more scales.

A’s we all know the present model of newtonian absolute lineal time, single space, man as the only intelligent being and physics as the model of science, with an abstract view of humanity separated from reality is in crisis and it has been so since Planck, Einstein, Darwin and Marx revolved physical, biological and social disciplines. Yet a change of paradigm has its phases. This blog is the point in which Planck found himself, when he affirmed:

‘ New scientific ideas never spring from a communal body, however organized, but rather from the head of an individually inspired researcher who struggles with his problems in lonely thought and unites all his thought on one single point which is his whole world for the moment.’

The seed of information thus is in my mind. It might be aborted but the seed is beautiful in itself, its code when developed in full one of the most fascinating endeavours of the Universe – its rules *of exi=st¡ence.*

Since the creation of such seeds are an herculean task; all what I can say, i cannot carry also point five of the revolution, neither it is my task.

In that sense point five normally takes another whole generation into the future. As Planck, the other colossus discoverer of quantum physics put it: ‘A scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.’

I did solve then the conundrum of bringing the perennial philosophy of the Universe to a scientific format, beyond the insights of eastern philosophers and Leibniz through a painstakingly lonely research of two decades till finally i had the model of relational space-time fully developed and applied to all sciences, r=evolving them from its first principles, with marvellous results.

And that i think is good enough for a single man.

Thus while the second part of the blog (4th line) is concerned with 5: the change of paradigm in all ‘stiences’ to its more sound, more accurate, more predictive models using relational space-time, I won’t see it completed in my life time.

Others will. Me, I just will try to fill this web, unificationtheory.com with my research, which more than in the details have been concerned with the ultimate reasons of Nature, Space, Time and its ∞ combinations, all the beings of reality, explaining its properties and deriving from them all the laws of all the ‘stiences’ of space-time beings of the Universe, *including those of social sciences, as we humans are also fractal, cyclical space-time beings as all other entities of the Universe.*

So 4 will be by force incomplete, as ultimately includes all ‘species in existence’.

**The structure of the web.**

Since all is made of Space, scales, time and minds, we use the four lines in that order to define the spatial properties, scalar stiences, temporal worldcycles, and diversification of species and evolution through scales of the fundamental singularity super organisms of the Universe.

THUS, Tthe first line studies a synchronous vision in space, using the Non-Æ point as element of reference to describe the reproduction of susperorganisms.

The second line considers the scalar view of sciences as humans depicture them by scales.

The third line explains in time the same process of growth we saw in the first line, with great precision, through the isomorphic ‘dynamic’ process of a mind, whose language guides the creation of bidimensional and then ternary networks, species, who travel through time and scales.

Finally in the fourth line departing from the main •minds of each scale of reality we study the main systems of the Universe.

In this first (and second) lines, we shall study the structure of fractal §pace and cyclical ðime beings, from an external point of view, in a general, non detailed, non-formal manner (as we will do in 3rd and 4th lines) by using the 3 epistemological pillars of GST:

- The experimental, scientific method, providing proofs of the cyclical, fractal ðime-§pace structure of all Universal beings.
- The correspondence principle, translating basic theories of classic science to ‘stience’.
- Which we shall fusion together into the GST-proper ‘stientific method’, the isomorphic method that shows any law of known-known science can
*be put in correspondence with the isomorphic properties of space-time beings, translated and applied to physical, biological an social systems equally. The isomorphic method though will be used in the third and fourth line. So the first two lines are meant to be a ‘transitional stage’ between ‘classic science’ and ‘future stience’.*

**So we structure the posts of those two first lines with a simple scheme.** At epistemological level (1) in the first line, we describe the topological (S), organic (∆), vital (T) and sentient (º) properties of beings, derived of its ∆ºST common nature.

Let us then first consider a ‘formal definition’ of the Universe and its dominant language of time=motion, its dominant substance, which is *logic (trans-forming laws) not geometry (structural space) that comes a second best as the dominant language of space, and above them bio-logy, organicism, the language of **scales…*

**STIENCES: ÐISOMORPHISMS.**

*Upanishads*. ‘The logic of God is of a higher order than human logic’

*Augustine*.

**ÐISOMORPHIC METHOD: RASHOMON 5D² TRUTHS. ¡TS LANGUAGE: ¬Æ LOGIC.**

** **

**The enhanced scientific method: ¬A(bcd)E**

**¬A(bcd)E stientific method:**

**ABCDE**‘ Principles of the Scientific method, which ads the properties of scalar space and cyclical time (Ðisomorphisms), the B-iological, organic models derived of it, and the Non-AE structure that results of the multiple nature of time-space dimotions to the classic elements:

*the 3 ad-ons to ‘Data-Correspondence-Experimental method’ caused by cyclical time and fractal space, which are non-Æ: i-logic geometry, organic, Biological models and Disomorphisms, are wraped up in*the Disomorphic method (a dynamic analysis of the system as it is generated by a seed of information, emerges as a super organism and lives a world cycle) or a shorter version – the analysis of the system through its 5 CAUSAL DIMENSIONS-ACTIONS-MOTION, or ‘Rashomon effect’ of multiple truths.

*fully search for 5 Dimotions-actions-points of view in the analysis of any event to discover the minimal causality of its existence, but that is precisely the huge handicap of huminds doing science – little-big egos jumping up ‘me, I an myself has the only answer.*

*anything in the entangled Universe you need the confluence of at least 3 ‘topological elements/timespace forms in a single plane of existence, 3±¡ planes that influence the event from above and below and the whole, and if we were to fully grasp the event, its past-present and future states as a block of time.*

*studying a ceteris paribus cause of the polidimensional Universe and saying this IS the only cause.*

*So for each article, we must consider AT LEAST the perspectives of those ∆±i scales and the 3 topologies of the ‘central plane’, ∆ø, where the event happens as a whole. This bare minimum (as the full blown understanding requires all the information of the past-preent-future world cycle block of time of the entity or event), implies to consider reality from the point of view of the 5 Dimotions of the Universe; as the entangled Universe always requires to understand reality from those 5 relative Topological Dimensions with motion=Dimotions=Actions of space & time to fully account for the simultaneous, multiple perspectives of reality.*

**¬A(bcd)E**xtraction of all the knowledge huminds can get of the being, which of course will NOT be all, as only the being has all the information into its self.

The formalism of the fractal ∆§t±¡ universe is **I-logic Geometry and ¬Ælgebra (existential Algebra)**, the 2 most used terms to describe the topo-logic structure of a Universe of fractal spaces and temporal energy. Existential Algebra is my favorite term, for all what has to do with the symbolic equations of non-Æ, I-logic geometry. So those are the wor(l)ds of most often used. ¬Æ, the best abbreviation.

The equations of ¬Æ are those of Dimotions of time§paces.

For example, V=s/t is a ¬Æ equation, which we must interpret better in terms of Ðimotions as:

Constant lineal inertia (motion) = $(λ) x ƒð = K

A case of the most general Metric of all possible time space demotions, ‘SxT’=K.

How many times of equation of Ðimotions of space-time there are, how much are related to the fractal generator, as all of them are sub-cases of the generator, how to connect them with the equation and laws of each science is the formalism of the stience of exist¡ences.

*as each of those dimotions is better studied with a certain language of the humind that we need to ad to the mathematical languages, verbal, logic languages, and bio-logical, organic ones; and finally metaphysical sentient/sensation-related concepts, which of course, the ceteris paribus egocy of scholars will shun off. Each humind has its own egocy perspective and we deal with that in our analysis of the equation of the mind, an infinitesimal mirror of still forms that believe to be infinite.*

O

**The logic causal principles of space, time and scales.**

The 3 main languages of any system that gauges information in the Universe will by survival ‘logic’ (bio-logic), respond to the need of the system to perceive the 3 components of reality, time-motions and spatial structures in a single plane of spacetime and the different scales of size, that co-exist in organic relationships. So those 3 languages, which we shall explore in depth in the second line, obviously within the restrictions of focus of the ‘humind ∆º: ‘wor(l)d¹+ ‘²iMath=. ‘³Tœ:… organize the information we extract from reality. As logic comes first (indeed regardless of physicists’ creationist theories, we humans use first words, our temporal logic language, and even maths was first expressed in its highest algebraic forms with words, and today proved with logic); we use logic terms to define the ‘connections’, and ‘causalities’ that give birth to space, time and scales. So we call the phenomena that gives birth to ‘super organisms in space’, *simultaneity*, to ‘time world cycles’ *synchronicity* and to new whole planes of existence, ‘*emergence*‘.

Of them, as usual the best understood thanks to Einstein’s General Relativity is Simultaneity. Of synchronicity little has been explored but there is experimental evidence. Of the processes of the scalar fifth dimension that gathers parts into wholes, or emergence, which is a sub discipline of systems sciences, nearly nothing is known.

In any case with those 3 terms the logic of the 3 fundamental elements of reality, ∆§ð is described easily in a dynamic way.

Since logic is nothing else but the causal reasons of the dynamic trans-formations of reality. But it is still left the biggest of all mysteries, ‘still perception’ and we have no ‘trick’ to know why perception happens, except survival – as it is indeed the ultimate will of our mind-singularity and so as we are all Disomorphic spacetime beings, other points must have the will to focus perception of reality, order a territory with that image, by reflecting its mind order, reproduce and survive. Reproduction of mind images becomes then the survival, biological reason of sentient perception. Moreover, the reduction of reality to mind views, is what causes those scales to happen in first place. As each pixel has a life of its own; and indeed, we can be defined as the thoughts of our local god, the mind of the Earth – or rather its organic evolution. So from the ultimate substance, motion comes the mind still perception of it to keep reproducing its motions. But what is motion? The next graph shows it to the surprise of the reader: a reproduction of form:

So we must consider a pan psychic universe made of two elements, which *are beyond causality, hence the immanent two primary states of being; motion in time and perception of space. They must therefore be the ultimate substances of reality. And its logic principle is the vital principle of reproduction. *

This said we can make a first bio-logic, ‘i-logic’…

**Definition of a Universe.•°‡‡ ‡**

Let us then start in order to understand the main perspectives of space, by defining the element of the Universe ia a fractal super organism made of…

The Universe is a fractal super organism made of 4 ternary **A(nti)symmetric (ab.¬Æ)** elements, Space, Time, ∆§cales, l@nguages related by…

**Operandi:** which can either annihilate or evolve the elements together, in two inverse motions which we shall call **Balance≈symmetry that gives birth to ‘5D’ social evolution, Λ> or Perpendicularity V< antisymmetry that causes entropic dissolution-death**:

**S:***space; an ENSEMBLE OF***ternary topologies,****(|+O≈ ø)**… which made up the**3 physiological networks**(|-motion/limbs-potentials + O-particle/heads ≈ Ø-vital energy) of all**simultaneous***super organisms.*

**∆:**distributed in ∆±i relative*fractal scales*that come together**EMERGING**as**∆º**super organisms, each one sum of smaller**∑∆-1**super organisms… that*trace*in a larger**∆+1 world…**

**ð:***a*each one dominated by the activity of one of those 3 networks: motion-youth, or relative past, dominated by the motion systems (limbs, potential); iterative present dominated by the reproductive vital energy (body waves), and informative 3rd age or relative future dominated by the informative systems, whose ‘center’ is:**SYNCHRONICITY**of timespace actions of survival that integrated as a whole form a sequential cycles of existence with**3 ages**,

**@: The mind**that reflects the infinite cycles of the outer world and controls those of its inner world, through its languages of information, which guide its 5 survival actions:

3 simplex, **aei**, finitesimal actions that exchange energy (**e-**ntropy feeding), motion (**a-**celerations) and **i**nformation (perceptions) with other beings.

And 2 complex actions: **o**ffspring reproduction and social evolution from individuals into **U-**niversals that maximize the duration in time and extension in space of the being.

It has to be noticed that creation is composed of two operandi, the balanced wave-state and the particle that emerges into the ∆+1 world: ≈ ˆ as a present-future coalitions, as opposed to entropic destruction, which is a simpler V form, a theme of enormous repercussions in all forms of existence essentially wave-particles preying over entropic dissolutions.

The study of those 4 elements and its operandi, which result in a social evolution together, or an entropic destruction is thus necessary in every analysis of reality, since all systems will be connected across its scales, with a larger outer and inner smaller world; will be perceived either simultaneously as a super organism or in time as a flow of actions integrated into larger ages, which will invariably guided by an informative stiff-mind, stop motion into information, warp and finally disintegrate itself.

WE HAVE highlighted the key ‘logic elements’ of those systems, which are profound laws of structure that define the Universe in its most abstract form. A physicist however will use the 3 conserved elements of nature, and call time cycles, ‘angular momentum’, singularities, whose mind is not perceived but needs stillness and so develops a stop and go steady motion, ‘lineal momentum’, and the vital energy x information included within it energy and say the 3 are converted. Then if he were able to break those cyclical times, singularity motions and vital energy into ∞ beings, voila, we would be speaking of the same:

The Universe is a tapestry of time§pace cycles, which are organisms of vital energy enclosed by an angular momentum, self-centered into singularities with an Aristotelian, lineal inertial selfish mind, programmed by an obsession, to survive, last in time, performing its actions, the program of exist¡ence, beyond a reasonable finite presence – this thirst for immortality through selfish actions self-centered in the lineal inertial singularity moving ahead in open freedom, however is always defeated by the larger whole that pressures us into making a closed, conservative path, an informative world cycle. And we indeed oblige, as the ego paradox produces a systemic bias towards our own self, exhausting the energy of our vital space.. till we die – explore back into a zero sum. Welcome to reality.

**The ego paradox**

It is essential to start afresh and be able to switch on and off between the subjective singularity point of view of an infinite universe of local diffeomorphic points of view or singularities of ‘time zero’ (where the motion of the angular momentum-membrane finally rests into the still linguistic image of the mind, ∆ð>§œ, to feel from this essential equation the meaning of it all. The vortex singularity point will then use that cyclical angular momentum>Vital energy>Singularity stillness 3 ‘phases’ of the world cycle, from Maximal Spatial extension (in the angular momentum) to the zero stillness of form, of perception of gauging information in its center, through the vital energy processes that fed the body wave before arriving to the singularity.

THAT IS THE GAME IN INFINITE TOES.

*SO space and time do exist in infinite fractal closed paths with a vital energy inside… self-centered in the mass-singularity or active magnitude*

This is what we study – the game of infinite fractal ternary systems of conserved singularity momentum, angular momentum=membrane and vital energy enclosed between them. How this simple ternary scheme can explain it all. How it travels through the scales of the fifth dimension to create the organic Universe, to live its world cycle to try to remain infinite and immortal from its povs, thirsty of power, to deflate finally as membrane and singularity detach from each other in the death process… to study its parts, its aeiou, actions of simplex survival (aei, moving, feeding on energy and information) and complex (social love and reproduction, ou). All this in its infinite iterations, sychronicities, networks, social organizations, is what we study and use to that aim two methods – the spatial simple slice analysis through the fractal generator, in its simplest form, ∑∆ð≥§@…

The method of the first line is simple. We study the existence of all ∆ºst beings of the Universe as super organisms tracing worldcycles:

” 5D ¬Æ ðime§paœ arrows åct≈Max.**∫e**xi∂st reproducing supœrganisms triping ωorldcycles of exi≈st¡enœ :

So we first define each of the words of that sentence which resume *dynamically* in * time* (‘timespace arrows’ ‘worldcycles’),

*simultaneously*in

*(‘reproducing’, ‘supœrganisms’), º*

**s**pace*mentally*through formal

*languages*(‘¬Æ’, ‘stience’, ‘Max. ∫exi∂st’) and

*organically*through

**∆-**

*scales*(‘5D’, ‘tripping’), the existence of all beings.

And then consider in more detail the element of the space-time being under the experimental method, by studying it in physical, biological and social systems.

In the second line (2) at experimental level we show the main ‘stiences’ of reality and its main species to obey those laws, which suffice to derive all properties of physical, biological, social and mental systems.

1) Epistemological Proofs, which ‘Correspond’ with classic theories and its experimental facts allowing for all the scales and entities of reality the description of its events and forms through:

- Its ‘mathematical≈ physical’ properties derived of its ternary topological=
elements and its time-symmetries≈worldcycles.*spatial* - Its biological properties, derived of the
**5D coexisting ∆±1 scalar social structure**of all systems. - Its ‘perceptive properties’ derived of the existence of Tiƒ singularities, Monad-mind-mirrors which either mechanically, vegetatively or consciously DO enact the program of exi=st¡ences, that is the actions, max. ∑exi which ensure the survival of the being, and we are called by biologists the ‘drives of life: ∆ï:perception & communication> ∆a:accelerated motion towards fields of >∆e:feeding energy> ∆œ: reproducing>∆û:evolving socially into ∆+1 Universals.

Which then leads to a general analysis under the non-reductionist set of spatial≈PHYSICAL, biological≈temporal and perceptive≈human survival properties of All beings, *to be studied in the second line on general terms, the third line for the three type of properties and sciences, an in the fourth line, for all an every species and isomorphism of Nature, in what should be time permitted under other researchers during this century the final ¬-Æncyclopedia of GST systems*:

2.1) Physical systems, those belonging to the ∆±i≥1 scales, far removed from anthropocentric man that denies to them the properties of:

2.2) Biological systems, those belonging to non-anthropomoprhic ∆±i≤1 and…

2.3) Historic, Humans systems those which are anthropomorphic, at individual ∆º or social ∆+1 system, either human or mechanical, made by imitating our organs and functions in metalife (organic machines, entropic weapons and informative money).

2.4) Mental, linguistic systems (mathematical, visual≈artistic, genetic, verbal, etc.), whose description under the ∆ºst properties of all beings will close the second line.

Needless to say the ‘hidden symmetries and correspondences’ of the parts of the Universe, as seen by human beings are many. For example, humans ‘like’ to apply only spatial=mathematical properties to physical systems, vital, temporal ages only to biological systems, social and mental qualities only to human beings, *yet we shall show the ∆ºst quality of all beings to be the same, regardless on how huminds, which want to come on top as the self-centred only intelligent, social loving species describe them.*

So for each of the key ‘elements’ of the program of informative creation (Tiƒ), energetic reproduction (ST) and entropic extinction (Spe) we shall describe in this first line, its *more abstract, logic and mathematical properties, with minimal experimental details, while the second line will be all about experimental details of those properties; and then again with far more detail and depth, the their line will explore those logic≈temporal an mathematical≈spatial properties of GST and the fourth line elaborate the blue print of a fire encyclopedia.*

As usual my apologies for the slow disorder form of construction of this web: translation from Spanish, digital copying of handwritten texts and pouring blocks to final polish – more like a diamond mining, cleaning, polishing process to finally get the shining of the organic, fractal mind of the Universe, whose brightness should enlighten future generations of huminds of Airobots, to feel the unity of all what exists.

**The third and fourth lines will be more formal in its structure: **

We shall define according to the ternary principle which is at the heart of the logic of the Universe, and break each of the four constituent element of reality, mind, space, time an scales, into sub-ternary scales, sub-ternary ages, sub-ternary topologies, and three sub-ternary languages, the four elements breaking them in three sub-elements. WE CALL THEN the 12=3 x 4 elements of reality, the isomorphisms (common laws of all systems of nature0 of GST and apply them in the fourth line to each part of reality.

**ITS CONTENT IN 2² LINES**

*First Ðimotion: Non-Euclidean points-singularities:nformative perception: §ð**Second Ðimotion: Lineal momentum: $t.**Third Ðimotion: ∑e x ∏i: Bod waves iterate energy & information: ∑∏.**Fourth Ðimotion: Entropic Universe: Death: S∂.**Fifth Ðimotion: @-Mind Worlds: Social, organic evolution: ∫T*

“5D Universe exi:sts as a Fractal ¬Æ ðime§paœ 3-network supœrganism iterating ∆-1:entropy≤∆ºenergy≥∆¹form ∞ World cycles:

|§paœ≈past≈entropy≈limb-fields ≤Present=Energy≈ø≈body-wave≥Times≈information≈future≈O≈particlesheads”

In that sense the blog is divided in two x two lines of similar content but increasing detail and complexity; *and perspective.*

As we can always have 5 Dimensional perspectives on the ∆ºs≈t being, that of scales (∆) of minds º, of space-fields/limbs/entropy, §; of cyclical time-information, ð, and of present momentum and its energy integral, ∫ω; we could in fact observe reality at least from those five dimensional perspectives. And even more… as quantum and gravitational physicists do with its multiple representations of the ∆-i, quantum and ∆+i, gravitational worlds.

As the first two lines study from an external point of view the process of creation of the Universe while the two final lines consider an internal point of view, as mind-monads of linguistic mapping generate reality.

The first line defines the program of supœrganisms constructed through the scales of the fifth dimension with the physiological laws of time arrows, origin of all the ex i = st¡ences and forms of the Universe. It reads in the ‘jargon of GST’ often ‘short-handed’ to fit it onto a single line by ‘alphabetic order’ (blog’s limitations): 5D non-aristotelian, non-euclidean cyclical fractal time space ternary arrows form the physiological networks of super organisms defined by its ‘world cycle of existence’ in which the being will try to maximise the drives/actions of life, motion, energy feeding, informative perception and communication, reproduction and social evolution, as it travels through the scales of the fifth dimension.

The second line defines according to scale the main stiences of space-time beings, in classic fashion, dividing them in astrophysical, biological and social stiences (history and economics); considering finally the languages of the mind, as all species including man have a biased vision of reality reduced to its ‘linguistic mind mirrors’, and the self-similar (isomorphic) worlds created with them. So we study verbal, artistic and mathematical languages.

In the more complex third and fourth line, we shall depart from classic science into pure ‘stiences of space-time’ beings, considering first how the 3 x 3 +∆º fractal space-time dimensions of all systems give birth to a set of 10 ‘isomorphic, related type of laws. As in the first line we try to make a sequential ‘meaningful sentence’ with all those properties, which read as:

“O-Minds Generate bidimensional networks that perform 4±∆ fractal actions of exchange of entropy energy and form between scales of the fifth dimension, ageing in the process as ‘constant vital’ species, travelling through the 9 social scales of their world and/or the 10 5D planes of reality, ‘the body’ of God, the impersonal, taoist, mind of the Universe.”

And then we shall study each scale and fundamental species of the Universe with those 10 sets of laws, from the smallest parts, informative quarks, rising in size through its spatial quanta, light and energetic electronic vital space,which form together, atoms that evolve socially into molecules, cells, living organisms, ecosystems and planets (and we study then in detail the human specific space-time species and its social organisms, and the three ages of evolution of planet earth, from a world of life (gaia) to a world of man (History) to a world of machines (the global stock-market and its company-mothers). Yet the planet is part of a social system, which also evolves socially with other stars into galaxies part of networks of galaxies, the cosmos, which likely will be only a small section of the infinite Universe.

Thus the blog is a blueprint for an ¬Æncyclopaedia of 5D Sπecies of Space-time, Supœrganisms, structured by the ¬Æ isomorphic laws deduced from the generator of fractal, cyclical space-time beings.

*In the rest of this post we will resume the two first lines and keep for the ‘post on ‘Isomorphisms” and ‘Planes‘ of stiences a resume of the third and fourth lines. As it **won’t fit all in a single page. It is a work always under construction and in permanent correction as 30 years of research have found different jargons constantly evolving with new discoveries and readjustments of jargon.*

Thus the blog is a blueprint for an ¬Æncyclopaedia of 5D Sπecies of Space-time, Supœrganisms, structured by the ¬Æ isomorphic laws deduced from the generator of fractal, cyclical space-time beings.

It is roughly divided in 2 x 2 lines, the first and third dedicated to understand conceptually the GST formal laws and topo-biological game of survival of space-time beings, who ‘exist’ according to a set of laws and restrictions where they can play exchanges of energy and information, ‘actions of space-time’ trying to maximise, Max. e x i, their survival.

THE SECOND and fourth lines we explain experimentally all the species of the Universe, in a more classic form in the third line, in correspondence with the more formal gst second line in the last, ordering by ∆-scales the species of reality.

His author is a system scientist, polymath and philosopher of science, which had always wanted to understanding it all as Leibniz put it, in unity. And once it did, try for a few years to make this work available through scholarship, in the fields of physics and systems sciences, which are as ‘primary sciences’ the most concerned with first principles. So i taught for a while, was Duality Chair at the world systems associations, and move among physicists… till I sued CERN and the nuclear industry for their research of black holes and strangelets, in a series of suits that became worldwide news (cover sunday NYTimes, most blogged news worldwide in march 2008) and prompted an ad hominem campaign that made me abandon the field of scholarship, and decided me to pour all the work in this web.

*We shall thus in the third line of the blog, study the ‘internal way of creation’ as Minds generate reality through process of order, once they have perceived it.*

To get the perfect focused mirror, the maximal knowledge is the goal of the Philosopher of science in terms of pure information, as he is a Tiƒ, ‘metal-linguistic world; and to act properly as an individual according to those linguistic reflection of the Universal world ordering your territory of order is the selfish goal to ensure its survival.

Let us then briefly introduce this third line which deals unlike the first line with the process of creation departing from the four elements of the being, the ∆º mind, its spatial ternary symmetry, time symmetry and ternary ∆-scales.

**THE ISOMORPHIC METHOD. 10 SETS OF LAWS**

The method of GST IS SIMPLE though repetitive. The Universe is made of systems with four elements, three dimensions of scales, three topological dimensions of space, which form super organisms with three ages/dimensions of time, all supervised by the will of survival of a mind.

Thus we talk of 5 DIMENSIONAL elements each one with three ternary sub-dimensions, and *therefore as we have affirmed all can be deduces from the ∆ºst-ructure of reality, and its ternary fractal principle, we talk of 5 x 2 = 1o isomorphisms, or sets of laws derived of the properties of minds, space-topologies, time-ages and scales of wholes and parts, as the next ‘stage’ of complexity of the entities of the Universe, in the building of complexity needed to study the details of reality.*

**The 12 ∆ST Isomorphic elements of all Fractal ∏ime§pace beings:**

**•: -1, 0****. **** ** Linguistic O-Minds **-1:** Generate…

**S=t, 2,4,5 **** **Fractal, asymmetric, Exi≈stential Åctions

∆,9,10** **through social §cales and Stientific Planes…** § : Ξ **

S 3, 6…** ** Forming Ternary, Constant Networks…** ****N, d**ifferentiated into species,** ∑**

**T: 7. 8 ** that live 3±∆ ages of a world cycle…** Ω****; w**

What this means is astoundingly simple.

º: All what exists are ternary systems ruled by a mind-singularity that orders in space three elements expressed in the generator equation of the being: Spe (Limbs/Fields) < St (body-waves) >Tiƒ (heads-particles, often the site of the mind), and performs actions of exchange of entropy, energy and information with fractal points of different scales of the fifth dimension, moving (Aa), feeding (Ae), perceiving and communicating (Aï) in order to reproduce (Aœ) and evolve socially (Au) into a larger whole, as that *is the best strategy for the being to survival. *

So we study four times the same reality from four different perspectives, that of the active mind and its will of survival just expressed…

The isomorphisms of the mind are then clear:

- ∆ºS; The isomorphism of its spatial location, mostly on the center of maximal communication, in inward, energetic systems, or in the upper dimension of informative height in informative systems, or in the foreword position in entropic systems (the ternary principle IS the fundamental law of causality, and creation of the Universe studied in depth in the posts on species and ¬Æ grammar.
- The isomorphism of temporal information, the language which shrinks to become the mind, AND we shall number as i for multiple reasons: it is the isomorphism of pure information, it is the symbol of the ‘imaginary number’, which we shall see is essential to the mathematical language as a number, to the verbal language as ‘imagination’, and so on. And ultimately because the language is the inverse function of the extension of entropy and space, a priori condition of creation of the mind; a dense knot of linguistic forms. And obviously because 0 must be the symbol of the mind, and the language comes ‘before it’.

**S**: then the ternary structure in space of the being as it growth from bidimensional actions, into ternary constant networks of entropy, energy and information, which allow the system to appear as a super organism in space S(2,3,4 isomorphisms).

**T:** Which give in turn birth to the three ages of time of the being, and its different ‘species’, which live a world cycle defined as a trip back and forth through scales of the fifth dimension, as the being is generated in an ∆-1 seminal scale, surfaces in the ∆0 individual scale, where it lives three ages to die back into the ∆-1 scale.

**∆…** Which therefore allow us to have a final view of the entity in existence through its evolution across social planes of the fifth dimension each one made of 10 sub-scales of social growth, if we study each ∆-fractal plane in its internal structure, or 10 scales of the whole observed by man, which we call in a mystical sense, ‘God: **Γº∆’:**

We can perceive God in that sense as the language of all ∆@s≈t languages in as much as the *language-scale comes from the whole down to all its forms, imprinting them. So the -1 and 11 ‘scales’ outside the being itself, do enclose the being. *

How the language, the software, the ‘saint spirit’ in the mystical tradition, infuses the seminal seed of its ∆-1 scale to ‘create a living being’ has to do with the ‘postulate of existence’ which requires *at least two poles of entropy and information in a dynamic event for an entity to exist.*

So the mind in its origin, made to the fractal image and likeness of the whole, God, as we are all Gods, all super organisms, all dust of space-time, is the alpha and omega of creation.

And the method to study each being as part of that unity, even if its details vary, is the essence of the isomorphic method.

From the perspective of the mind, we state, the goal of the system is to preserve its ternary STRUCTURE, within balance with the external ST world, which we express in the function of existence, e x i = st, in its ‘simultaneous, verbal-mathematical expression’; useful for philosophical discourse, but better expressed in the Generator.

**@**

Ø1. The two first isomorphisms to describe the being are its Mind, Tiƒ, and its generator function: ∆º Γ:

We observe a being, its ternary parts, body/wave, field/limbs and particle/heads, and focus on the dominant ∆º particle-head.

We could then departing from the pole of information express how the being will act in the external world to absorb and emit entropy and information, or its combined energy to maintain its balance with the external world. Yet *if Tiƒ is a seed of information, and the being is not yet formed, we can do an alternative ‘developmental’ description or palingenesis of the being, a fascinating subject so far only studied with certain depth in biology according to which the being will start to reproduce its information in clone forms, and grow through its actions of feeding, reproducing and evolving socially emerge into a new being.*

And this is the particular ‘arrangement’ of the third line in a convenient order to study all the processes of the being, as it goes through its world cycle.

**S<≈>t**

5. 4. Bidimensional flows of entropy, energy and information which become Asymmetric Åctions.

The mind acts through bidimensional flows, waves that communicate the singularity with another region of reality to extract s and t.

So the mind-being will first start to ‘act’ in a sequential order of perception of information, motion if required towards a field of energy (provided on spot usually by a mother through its genesis), absorption of entropy, reformed into energy by impritng of its form, reproducing the system. So next to the Mind-Generator, we study its existential actions, with a simple mandate: *‘Grow and multiply’*

Those actions are always exchanges of energy and information between two asymmetric poles that might derive into a perpendicular darwinian ab=use of each other, or a symmetric, reproductive social evolution.

**S≈uperorganisms**

3, 6 Ternary Space-Time Networks… N

But once growth of parallel clones is achieved, in herds roaming on its St+1 ecosystem, density of form requires efficiency in the handle of entropic motions and energetic ‘substance’, so by trial and error in earlier evolution, by *mind’s compression of the events of time, without the errors, which is the main function of the mind – efficiency as it must shrink the whole of the cycles of ‘being’ into those who are ‘meaningful in its perfect form’…*

The variations of power of those networks give birth through topological evolution to 6 key species, SstT, STst, TstS, TSst, stTS, stST

7,8 that live 3±∆ ages… Ω; through a world cycle that exhausts all its motions

And so in this manner, *all systems that grow and multiply end becoming supœrganisms, invaginated by three networks, which attach the cells/atoms/citizens to its flows of entropy, form and energy, making them dependent on the networks, which will become themselves, the three parts of an Γ+1 generator in a new scale of growth.*

* 9. 10 since existence is a travel through social §cales and Stientific Planes… § : Ξ*

*Is there a limit to that growth? If time has been eternal, it follows reproduction has been infinite and so are the scales of beings.*

Which brings us to the question of, the mind of all minds, the mind…

Γœ∆, which as the reader observes is written as the mind ‘backwards’ or rather the infinitesimal mind is a reduction backwards of the ∞ mind of god; with the *added body, œ, of the suprorganism, as that is the game the mind imprints in reality. So God is the mind of the perfect supœrganism, and its laws – the Universe, which was indeed the definition Plato made of it*.

God though is NOT an isomorphism of any species, but the absolute whole of which all beings are mirrors, within its mind-organism structure. So it would be silly to consider it for the different species. We are part of god the whole, god is not part of us, the mind just its reflection. So from languages to scales we shall defined for each species its 10 isomorphisms.

And since we have said, the mind is the mirror that efficiently reduces the information to its pure seed of perfect forms; we imagine creation in a first infinite past googleon of time, was the product of a mathematical mind, which shrunk and cleaned the Universe of its worst experiences, reducing it to the perfect form of the mathematical, i-logic, organic game we describe in our posts on mind languages.

And so we close the isomorphisms that describe any being, within the cycle between mirror, creation, reproduction, imprinting of a perfect seed, which will be reborn after devolution, and show how this process accounts for it all, from the simplest seed of form – a photon, to the most complex wholeness, the mind of God. And then in the final line we shall use those isomorphisms to explain each and every form that matters on existence, between the ±4 scales and planes of God we do perceive.

No more can be said as a Human mind of it all. Indeed, initially i did put Γºœ∆ as the last post of the web, also with its isomorphisms, but then I realise such act of astounding arrogance from my ø-humind (ab. human mind) was the biggest sin humans have once and again commited. So I keep what people normally call religion, as the interpretations of the mind of God by humans, in the *section of History mostly, divided between anthropomorphic religions of god, which study the subconscious collective of human societies, evolved by the power of social love, and eastern, objective religions which study as this blog does the taoist/hindi game of yin-formation-visnu & Shiva-entropy-yang:*

What languages then matter to describe the Universe? Of course mathematics, the language of space, and logic the language of time, integrated in the demonstrations of mathematical laws, but *also bio-logical, organic laws, which are embedded in the fractal, co-existing structure of parts and wholes. And then for each species, which observes the Universe, its particular, ‘local’ languages, all of them unified by a ‘ternary structure’ that reflects the Universe’s ternary elements. For example:*

Subject (informative being) < verb (space-time action) > Object (entropic energy of subject) IS the Universal grammar of all human verbal languages, equivalent to:

red colors (spatial entropy) < green/yellow (energy) > Blue (temporal information) for animal visual languages

F(x):time-like parameter < (operandi: action) > G(x): space-like parameter, which defines mathematical equations and its simpler Boolean algebra which in computers reduces all to 0 and | truth or false, ±, and its combined gates.

**Relative time travels.**

All this said, even if we shall consider this section as a process which departs from the mind; *the mind is the perspective of man, an informative being, whose arrow of time is self-centred in its Tiƒ element. But the story is a bit more complex.*

This program of creation, as we said can be seen as an *external process, hence departing from the ‘external field of space-time in which the being exists’. And this which is the approach of physicists becomes an* objective description or internal through the will of the being. Both are however tied by the complementarity between both; which means that *the mind alone needs to understand the differences with the limb/field to become a complementary field-body-wave/head particle to be=come*.

And so the philosophical question about the program of creation is this:

From the perspective of the mind, the mind causes reality, but from the perspective of the field, the field is its origin; and so we must readdress our idea of time arrows to include both perspectives. And fine tune the previous concept of the mind willing to survival as the time arrow we humans, mental beings see as the future: Tif>>Spe (human arrow). Yet from the point of view of the field; the singularity emerges from it and we shall then consider that if we were a field, we would see the singularity as our ‘creation’: Spe>>Tiƒ; and consider that process the arrow of future.

And so the proper way to consider causality is to affirm that the relative S>t and T>s arrows form a feed back equation, S<≈>T of present, which becomes the defining process of symbiosis and complementarity of existence. This gives us three temporal descriptions which we observe in many sciences. I.e. in quantum physics there is mathematical description in which the field gives birth to the particle (quantum field theories) another in which there are multiple present paths between them (Feynman) and another in which the singularity creates the field (classic description of electrodynamic).

Yet for that reality to make sense, it implies we need to adopt a single perspective, as the human mind is NOT multidimensional; and that is the approach we have taken after decades of working for my self playing with the three approaches simultaneously. How this works is simple, by accepting that fields are past and so it is possible a local travel to the pst, when we observe, Spe>>tiƒ, from the causal origin in tiƒ: Tiƒ<<Spe. So we affirm that *a system Tiƒ can travel to its past, when it devolves into a field. *

*And distinguish in this process of entropic devolution of a being into its ∆-1 ‘limbs/field scale’, two degrees of entropic motion, locomotion tiƒ<Spe, and entropic death – a fast dissolution of form and expansion in space, Tiƒ<<Spe.*

In the graph sample we see how those local time loops play in a field around the black hole, where in the equations we see how time signs change in complex and various ways, depending on the models of equations we use, as physicists ignore the ¬Æ logic of ternary time. So weird interpretations like the one of the graph (Hawking’s black hole evaporation to the past, never found experimentally seem possible; as he affirms a man could fall into a black hole and come out in the past and kill the father). Not so as *relative future to past motions are logic motions which affect only the time-space arrows of the ‘ternary system; singularity-body-field, through its world cycle of life and death*. It is precisely the exploration of those three timespace arrows the content of ¬Ælgebra, which gives origin to a 3 x 3+ 0 10 dimensional description of the supœrganisms of the Universe.

**Mind mirror interaction with the Universe, reflected in blog. Ego paradox bias stientific properties.**

Reality in that sense is CONSTRUCTED BOTH WAYS, FROM the objective ∞ Universal space-time into the ø-mind mirror, which will use its ternary syntactic languages to perceive and then it will reflect the mind’s language, point of view and will of survival, *through its actions of subjective order of reality to make it look like its mind mirror. *

And from that dual back and forth relationship *both the Universe and the mind-mirror evolve into more perfect apperceived realities*

So we shall *also reflect that duality in the blog’s division of 2 x 2 lines, explaining both sides of the process:*

*
*The first two lines study from an external, OBJECTIVE point of view the process of creation of the Universe, as an observer would observe the different creation of supœrganisms co-existing in several scales of the fifth dimension, performing its world cycles of existence, each species belonging to a different ternary scale, which humans study in four basic groups of sciences:

- Astrophysical sciences, focused in the most remote scales, described external spatial, objective motions, but
*unfortunately rejecting all other properties*under the paradox of the mind-ego. - Biological sciences, focused in the species of life, similar to humans, closer to us, and hence given according to the paradox of the ego (only closer systems to us are given its full properties) life-biological properties, but denied linguistic mental perceptive properties till very recently.
- Linguistic sciences, which study the languages of the mind, focused in human languages, verbal, temporal, visual, artistic and spatial, mathematical languages, whose sentient properties as LANGUAGES PERCEIVE IN THEMSELVES, are denied again to all other mind-mirrors and languages, considering only intelligent and ‘free’, those actions performed by human languages. (At best animals have instincts, the rest of reality nothing).
- But and this will be the biggest surprise of GST, when considering human social sciences, humans are ALSO DENIED SOCIAL organic properties beyond the individual at the social level, which however are considered and practiced with machines by its company-mothers? Why?
- This will lead us to a novel analysis of company-mothers of machines, placebo democracies and how the evolution of Gaia is terraforming the earth into a planet of metal-machines, which contrary to belief have through its company-mothers with its private issue of stock-money and unlimited money, anonymous societies laws, absolute rights as the free citizens of the econ(nomic)system. So for that reason we do NOT evolve into a global human super organism but a global market; as humans have become ‘enzymen’ ‘animetals’, catalysers of the evolution of memes of metal, money, weapons and machines, aborting its own social evolution.

Yet in the two final lines consider an internal point of view, as mind-monads of linguistic mapping generate reality in its reflection of its mind-mirror or ‘seed of information’ (∆-1 tƒi), imprinting the Universe in the process, generating through its actions of motion, reproduction, information and social evolution a super organism, which will have a constant form as a simultaneous mess of three physiological networks, S, st, t in space, but moved by the mind will age, as it travels its cycle of existence through the social scales and planes of ‘God – mystical view of the mind of the Universe’ made to its image and likeness, in its finite life and detach world cycle.

The mandate though for each being is simple: ‘grow and multiply, maximise your existence, move ad maximal with your entropic limbs, reproduce your body-waves, perceive the beauty of its forms with your mind-head-particle’. So even before we define in this post the game for all species and develop its future paths in other ones, we can simply write the equation for each ‘being’, ∆ºst, gauging the entropy and information of the game:

**Maximize your existence as a fractal space-time being.**

ðime§paœ ∆ûst r=evolves accelerating towards ¡ts future, ∆º-singularity mind, which will stiff its motions into the entropy of death.

At that moment perception occurs, in the synchronous mind mapping of the linguistic intelligence of the monad, infinitesimal mirror of the universe. But at that moment time becomes 0 space with no motion, and it is that pure present moment which stops the future exploding to compensate the stillness of form into an entropy wave of disorder, back to the past for the worldcycle to complete. It is the singularity mind who orders and kills at the same synchronous still present spaœ. This moment of death, of zero time, which precedes the ejection from the singularity at ∞ space; is perhaps the meaning of all existences, to stop motion the substance of the Universe; to see it all broken immediately in the entropic explosion that follows.

Humans think they understand the Universe, and that is fine – they do understand it to the limits of what they need to know to perform their roles on it. Moreover they always thought so. And each time they thought their ‘method of knowledge’, and ‘language’, myths reasons, words, numbers were the only proper way to describe it. First the used the word God, then the word science, first verbs to describe time then numbers and clocks.

And yet information is inflationary and keeps growing, so we will always expand this knowledge with new r=evolutions on the understanding of its man in concepts, time, space, mind, causality and scales.

We wrote a synoptic ‘concept-equation’ to summon all those realities, ∆º±ST: we are all made of ∞ dust of space-time.

We have now explained its two fundamental elements, the ternary arrows of space-time; S, T, s=t, and the fractal scales of the fifth dimension, ∆±i.

This should suffice for an external description of reality, but NOT to explain the persistence and order of all wholes, and the meaning of science, as the whole supœrganism (ab. œ, changing slightly as usual in GST, the wording of super-organism) MUST have a point or centre of order that ensures its survival. This is the function of the mind that transits between ‘∆±1 scales’, as a pure *temporal singularity, in **contact with the inner ∆-i world of the body-limbs, but also with the ∆+i outer world in which it performs the actions of the survival program of exchange of energy and information that all systems ‘in existence’ follow.*

Further on, in as much as science is a mental endeavour of perception of the Universe with the mirror-languages of time and space of the mind (logic and geometry), without understanding the mind-mirror and its interaction with reality there is no way we can make sense of a philosophy of science.

**FIRST LINE**

*5d ∏ime§paœ ¬Æ points maximise their exi:s≈tienœ reproducing supœrganisms tripping ∆º world cycles… * is the first ‘funny’ sentence of the blog, which encodes of many similar ones, the meaning of it all. Reality is made of motions with form, past spatial entropy x future, temporal form, Spe x Tƒi, of cyclical times, πimes and fractal, organic spaces, spaœ ‘dust’, island-universes, which are dust from a higher perspective, ‘∆ust’, made of scalar space-time ‘arrows’/motions with form.

Yet all dust ‘exist’ and by the mere fact of existing it will have a singularity,a temporal mind, tº∆º, which will come in contact with a field of entropy, S, and extract a wave , s ≈ tº of energy and information, ex i.

To exist is to be a singularity mind with a perception, a mirror and a desire to order according to the mirror the Universe around the mind monad. And to that aim it will maximise its body-wave, e xi, exchanging entropy and form, from an Spatial field, in which it host, by approaching in parallel and absorbing in perpendicular, its motion with form. To maximise existence we can use a simple equation:

Max. exi|s=t, that is all systems try to maximise its present momentum by finding a balance between its body and information e=i.

**1.1** Max. e=i

will in that sense be the simplest expression of the ‘existential function’; as it is a given that e and i will enter in relationship and communion of compemetnarity and maximise their reproduction and excommunication when both have the same value:

**1.2** e+i=K-> Max. e x i (e=i)

So there are three arrows of time. 2 which we can consider pure changes towards two poles of the being: pure form, which we relate closely to the still linguistic mappings of minds. Tƒi. And its opposite. Pure distance-space, simultaneous non-local, non-perceivable, Spe. Those two poles akin to the yin and yang pure limits of taoism; would represent in physics, pure, invisible gravitational space-vacuum and informative ultra-dense black holes. In biology the seminal seed of information that starts the life-death cycle and its explosion and dissolution in death. In topology, the singularity and membrane of a ‘ball’.

IT IS THE COMBINATION OF BOTH though in bidimensional present ‘momenta’, mixing both entropy and form, e x ƒ, what truly moves and changes the world, as pure seeds of information and invisible actions at distance are not perceivable.

So we talk loosely of PRESENT as the product of e x i : s=t, that is as the mix of both limiting singularities and membranes (in a topological view) or mix past and future in a present (in a temporal view) , or ∆±1 scales of loose herds of entropic parts and tight knots of mind-perception, in a coordinated ∆º body-wave.

This ST, present, e x i ∆º body wave thus has both energy (form with dominant motion) & in-form-ation, form-in-action (form with minimal motion).

And so we consider Spatial Past-entropy x Time Future-information: Spe x Tƒi = ST=exi: present momentum, mixture of ‘energy’ and ‘in-form-ation’. This is the conventional verbal use of the terms ‘energy’ and ‘in-form-ation’ that we preserve here.

And we call by convention, the relative ‘past’ of the Universe, the non-informative, pure vacuum and ‘future’ the, maximal informative state, even if both come back and forth in world cycles.

However as energy has been so much studied in mathematical terms, we have also to explore the somewhat slightly different more restrictive term of mathematical energy, as the integral of present momenta, which therefore will measure all the present momenta from birth to extinction of the being.

Thus humans measure those world cycles and its symmetric Organic simultaneous systems, with Energy used as the main parameter of physics to calculate physical world cycles which if computed for the whole existence of the physical event becomes a conservative zero cycle that does not spends energy. As all world cycles between birth and extinction are indeed conservative zero sums.

The energy of the system thus represents the simplest quantitative value of the capacity of the being to exist, its top predator force, total momentum, length and density of its worldcyle, etc.

We thus need to make a whole redefinition of energy to fully grasp world cycles.

As we shall explore both concepts together, we will also observe the symmetries which energy display in space as world cycles do with the super organisms they create.

Now the funny thing as usual is that the seemingly perennial super organisms in space are the fleeting mayas of the world cycle of time, the dynamic motion patterns of information, form-in-action which is what truly states on the long term. So goes for energy, which stays while the fleeting physical systems mutate.

Time passes only when it accelerates, as the inertia of repetitive, reproductive, present time doesnt seem to pass, this is an essential knowledge so time is always a vortex of acceleration and as such the words time=charge (quantum time) = temperature (energy-human inner time) =mass (gravitational time-acceleration are the same concepts). This is perhaps the biggest discovery of GST:

In the graph, time is truly beautiful in its three arrows when we ad the psychological everyday dimension of inner perception of man of those three arrows. Time doesn’t pass when reproduction occurs, which gives the orgasmic feeling of immortality proper of all re=productive actions of the eternal fractal. Time does pass when the system evolves in time as it accelerates, and so time passes also in nature’s clocks, quantum charges and masses and any physical vortex of the kind, V(t) x R(s) = K(st), the equation of the vortex – a time equation of 5D metric, as time we conclude PASSES, MOVING UP AND DOWN 5 D Scales.

As time is acceleration and acceleration is form of wholes, we conclude the time arrow of acceleration is in the fifth dimension so time only evolves through motions in the fifth dimension and this opens further the complete fully grasping of the essential nature of time sequential order.

The three arrows of time properly translated into an accelerated ‘vortex of time’ in our scales of the Universe (energy functions, hƒ in the quantum scale, kT in the thermodynamic scale, mv in the gravitational ∆1 scale) becomes masses, temperatures and angular planck constants are time flows which leave a trace in space, as each cycle persists a given dynamic timespace of existence.

Now, let us introduce the terminology of , ‘stience’, and its GST≈∆ΦΓ ƒormalism considering the use of greek or double letters to slightly change the meaning in latin and make possible to introduce complexity with self-similar yet not equal concepts as those of normal ‘science’.

Cyclical time for example makes use of the similar letter π, ∏, which symbolises the cycle,and also the multiplicative form, which symbolises the network structure of informative bits: ∏imps.

§paœ on the other hand is fractal, co-exiting in several social, œrganic scales, forming the super organisms, ab.œ, of space-time, whih is all what exists, made of a relative ∞ number of infinitesimal ∆-1 particles of a lower plane, dust of space-time that evolves into island-universes, worlds, supœrganisms, made of three physiological arrows formalised with the laws of non-aristotelian, non-euclidean time: ¬Ærrows.

*Hence the title of the post, a Universe made of: 5D ∏ime§paœ ∆ûst oƒ 3 ¬Ærrows*

We shall use three terms and slightly different versions of the generator equation according to which of the three symmetries of the Universe we study:

Γ: For the wholeness of a world cycle generator equation that describes the three elements of beings in increasing detail:

∆-1: å for the actions of space-time, Ωº for its time Ωges, and W∑e+1, for its whole energy, its world cycles.

So those are the symbols for the generator equation of time arrows, its actions, ages and world cycles most used, which we combine often into other games of ‘words’ and phonemes, reconstructing self-similar words in different languages, as in the word Gœd=∆ºΓ

Φ & œ are the symbols for the | xO=Φ organic topologies parallel to those ages.

∆º±1 ±i, the scales of the being, which will normally be three. And so we can do ceteris parbius analysis stretching one of the parts of, ‘ΓΦ∆, GŒD’ in greek and latin letters. We are aware of the meaning of the word God, taken in GST as the mind of the Universe, more specifically the ‘game of existence’, or ‘function of existence’ that makes reality be a constant creation and destruction of world cycles of super organisms.

The use of different symbols stresses the fact that the Universe is a fractal that gather both in space and time smaller elements into wholes in three ranges. For example, time arrows combine first in ‘actions’ (å) of energy and time, the minimal unit of physical systems, expanded to all systems. They gather in ‘ages’, (Ω) in which a type of arrow dominate. And those ages become finally world cycles (∑, w), which is the ternary wholeness beyond which a new game starts. In space we also find three topologies that become a ‘whole super organism’ (ab. Œ); and finally in scales, while we can observe multiple planes along the decametric logarithm scale, we shall find most systems do operate in three scales above and below the ∆º organic scale of the individual, where a ‘mind-informative center’ projects through actions of exchange of energy and information order over its territorial ternary system.

The absolute relativity of those atomic/cellular parts that become whole organic systems, diminutive actions that become whole world cycles of existence, is main explicit in our ‘third line analysis’ of the isomorphic nature and growth in time and space of those super organisms: the being will start as a mind pov, generating with actions of space-time a series of exchanges of energy and information with the world, starting a process of growth and organisation through three ages, and different variations of species, till becoming a whole ‘being’ an island-Universe in itself, extending through 10 scales of social growth and planes of reality. So all beings are from that perspective of full growth a God-mind, an island-Universe, but from a larger scale of existence, a mere particle-point or mind observing the infinite.

**The absolute relative Universe of finite time, extension and scales for each º∆º mind ordering it.**

So we can call God, the mind of the Generator, infinite, scalar Universe of decametric planes, and all its decametric parts, with an ∆º mind the 10th dimension ruling them. And thus alas! despite so much critical thought on Absolute space-time and Newton’s religious musings, we do accept Space as the body of God, what we call Plenum, but also Plato understood:

‘REALITY is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called Logos’ Timeus, Plato.

It is important to understand the spirituality of an informative, organic universe, where the particle is not a substance as all is motion (albeit seen in simultaneity as a space form), and all is intelligent, meaning it has a cause, consequence, form and function.

But ALL IS RELATIVE, as there is no preferred motion (relativity proper), form (all being variations of the three topological only species of reality), age and evolution (as all evolutions are part of a larger world cycle which will end into death and extinction) and scale. It is precisely this final relativity of scale, which makes indispensable to understand the game in subjective terms, as any ‘point of view’ which controls a system and organises it will have a subjective limited range of perception both in time (its life duration) space (its territory of inner order, membrane of communication and outer world) and scales (beyond which uncertainty, darkness and indistinguishability will make the borders of its perception, the limits of being)

Only then considering that the quantities that matter are constant ratios maintained across scales, that reality is designed for the observer, and limited by it, we can figure out truly the Universe as an absolute relative fractal where mind-points act as mirrors of order, creating around them territorial organisms with a limit of existence in time, of duration, of extension and of co-existing scales.

All this said we can now deal with mathematics as an excellent mirror image of that primary reality. And expand our foundations of logic and mathematics to introduce the simplest equations of GST and elements of any mind describing its relative ternary world: island-universe.

**The fractal Generator.**

We shall start by analysing the basic ‘formalism’ of Duality, the ‘fractal generator equation’ of the ‘fifth dimension’ of space-time beings that describes all the systems of entropy and information of the Universe, joined by its body-fields of energy:

Γ. Fractal Generator Feed-back equation of Space-time beings:

∆-1: *$pe (Planar, Lineal, Past entropy limbs/fields/territories)<∆º-ST: Hyperbolic, Present re=productive Working-citizens-body-waves of Energy>Tiƒ:Informative Future cyclical heads-particles-informative classes: ∆+1*

This canonical equation of space-time beings incorporates all the previous partial equations of the temporal ages, physiological functions and topological forms of all the ternary physical, biological and social systems of the Universe.

We have added sociological systems and its ternary ‘class structure’, where the lineal, flat territories of Gaia provide our motion and food, (social Spe), the citizens of a nation work and reproduce its good, as its ST-body and the elite neuronal classes that control its languages of information, financial money or bankers and informative laws or politicians, normally living in a small capital territory.

And we have added a final element, its structure in social networks made of parts, ∆-1 that become wholes, ∆+1, or ‘5th dimension’ of the scalar, organic Universe (ab. ∆), to fully become a complete description of all the systems of reality.

Thus once we define the metric equation of 5D and incorporate its ∆±1 organic scales to Γ, the Generator, we will thus have a template logic equation to describe all systems of nature and its processes of existence.

I have been studying the Universe with 3 time arrows and a scalar dimension of space, for so long and found so many amazing solutions and explanations to reality that I do not want all this to remain in my ‘Leonardian notebooks’ – so to speak. Thus I will keep pouring all this research on the scalar structure of a web I will do so in this ‘unificationtheory.com’ site for future researchers to be able to unravel the deepest structure of reality and wonder over Trinity, 5D and the scalar immortal Universe far more beautiful and richer than the models physicists sponsor with a single arrow of time – expansive entropy, which is only 1/3rd of 1 of its ∞ scales.

**¬Æncyclopedia**

The blog is a blueprint for an ‘¬Æncyclopaedia – the encyclopaedia of the Universe of Supœrganisms, as such it has a ¬Æ structure.

We first define in the main line, what the Universe is all about: a fractal reproductive supœrganism of space-times (1st line) in which all species of all scales of the 5th dimension of scalar space-time follow the same laws, grouping in 10 isomorphisms that describe the world cycle of existence of all its supœrganisms, and the topobiological properties of those ∆ûst of space times, island universes, which think to be ∞ but are just dust and dust become.

Next in the 2nd line we get ‘pros’ of stiences and describe all scales in stientific languages of the Human Mind (ab.Humind, Hm).

Thus departing from the Hm p.o.v. of knowledge and its languages of time (1st stience, time logic, and space, 2nd stience, mathematics, ) we describe to describe with growing detail, the reduced Scales of astrophysical stiences (Max. |i|), then biological systems and finally our super organisms and worlds, with maximal detail of knowledge, but not of truth (as we see societies in a very distorted anthropomorphic form).

THEN the 3rd line describe *the 10 sets of isomorphic laws, generated by all mind-mirrors of the Universe trying to maximise its function of existence, followed by all* those scales of nested worlds and its stiences described again in…

the 4th line, in a more objective manner, departing from the smallest plane of dark energy and neutrino, invisible gravitational fields, through the light-electrconic field, the atomic field of the z-2 scale upwards till arriving to the cosmological scale and beyond the ∞ games of decametric scales we call ‘God’, the Mind of the Universe.

The 2nd line is the most familiar, with less ‘GST’ formalism and language, we shall bring its content first, also as a practical proof of the applications of General Systems as a philosophy of all the stiences and forms of knowledge of mankind. So you realise that indeed, the 5th dimension is real…

**Line 2: **STiences: Functions of exi=st¡ences

“All the different classes of beings which taken together make up the universe are, in the ideas of God who knows distinctly their essential gradations, only so many ordinates of a single curve so closely united that it would be impossible to place others between any two of them, since that would imply disorder and imperfection.

Thus men are linked with the animals, these with the plants and these with the fossils which in turn merge with those bodies which our senses and our imagination represent to us as absolutely inanimate.

And, since the law of continuity requires that when the essential attributes of one being approximate those of another all the properties of the one must likewise gradually approximate those of the other, it is necessary that all the orders of natural beings form but a single chain, in which the various classes, like so many rings, are so closely linked one to another that it is impossible for the senses or the imagination to determine precisely the point at which one ends and the next begins’ *Leibniz*

Let us then give you a fast view of those new revelations in physics, biology and sociology (we try to keep the work simple for any science student to understand but some concepts required logically a ‘change’ of chip and the suspension of ‘dogmas and beliefs’ you have learned and memorised as absolute truths, when they are mostly simplified models of the more complex models we will develop __by adding cyclical detail to time, and widened also the detail of our vision of space, adding its fractal, discontinuous multiple scalar 5D structure.__

And while there are variations of speed for different ‘discontinuous species’, so the faster species at equal size win the battle for existence (hence faster mammals kill snakes, and likely despite ‘physicists’ tantrum of rocks bombing the Earth, evolution NOT rocks, killed dinosaurs as faster, smaller night, hot blood mammals ate their slow nesting eggs from beneath the earth, except those put on high rocks by birds)… for ANY family of ‘physical or biological beings’ the law holds and explains soo many things:

From the rotation of planets (faster in smaller orbits, according to Kepler’s laws, never explained in its whys) to the attraction of ‘vortices of forces’ (stronger and faster in charges than larger, slower masses of the gravitational cosmic scale – the so called hierarchy problem of forces, still unresolved), which are like the 3rd graph, an accelerated clock, to hurricanes, tornados, fast calculating, smaller chips and evolution.

Since all species according to that metric, ALWAYS START with a faster, smaller new top predator species, that grows in size ‘eating’ the larger slow one.

**Now, I**n this 2nd line we have a different order to STIENCES that THE ONE of the 4th one, plane by plane.

We start with biological existences, as it is THE MOST WELL described, closer stience that should BE THE MODEL OF ALL OTHERS, which failed to achieve its objectivity.

Then we describe the Economic ecosystem of Evolving machines, as they ARE organisms of metal evolving now into robots and as such should be treated by mankind if we want to avoid our extinction in the nearby future by the new top predator species, the robotic weapons. Next we deal with the Human Societies and Historic Sciences that must control the Economic ecosystem, (the ∆+1 evolution of machines) in its negative forms (hence the -∆2 tag of scale, as it competes today in capitalist societies for the meager resources of the planet that the ∆+2 human scale requires).

So regarding the ‘tagging of scales’, Biological sciences are concerned really with all scales, but as defined by humans, those biological properties are given only to close species of Planet Earth in the cellular, individual and social, ecosystemic scale, including machines as organisms of metal evolving at the atomic->mechanical->company-mother and global market scales.

Humans do also evolve from individuals into social groups, and the individual should see itself as a cell-citizen of those social scales of which history, mankind in time is the more important and the one that should ‘survive’ first for man to thrive in its organisms as individual. Hence the tagging ∆1², meaning the individual 1-scale should love eusocially other humans to transcend into the social +2 scale.

And so finally we arrive to what normally comes firs as a science but we put last, astrophysical sciences, but mind the reader, we wrote it as ¬Æ, *since we will ad biological organic properties to physical systems, denied by physicists, hence establish Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean physics of the 5th dimension, and then as such, the scales of bio-physical systems have no limit, repeating every 10 planes the infinite game of existence (proved by the infinity of transcendental numbers such as pi). *

So we can call God, the mind of the Generator, infinite, scalar Universe of decametric planes, and all its decametric parts, with an ∆º mind the 10th dimension ruling them. And thus alas! despite so much critical thought on Absolute space-time and Newton’s religious musings, we do accept Space as the body of God, what we call Plenum, but also Plato understood:

‘REALITY is an organism with a body called the Universe and a mind called Logos’ Timeus, Plato.

## Tº≈∆•: MIND STIENCES

## Mental Mirrors and its topo-logic stiences

Minds are Mirrors that map the Universe within an infinitesimal point, *to reflect then through actions the mind-mapping in a biased selfish way, expressing as imaginative creative actions, the natural distortion which the self-centred language provokes into the being. And that is the automaton, Leibnizian apperceptive engine of reality. *

That is why we talk of Mental Mirror Stiences, which in each species might differ in language and mapping, detail and construction but will always imply a back and forth, reversal motion from Universe to mind to Universe, in which the mind will express according to the mirror, its program of survival and existence. And that is the self, which is the same for an atom, a human being, a lion or a black hole, *as observed in the selfish acts of survival of all of them.*

This said this section will concentrate in the specific mind-mirrors of man, as we are really enzymen, catalysing the evolution of machines and so we use both our languages and those of the machine to perceive time and space:

- Artistic, proper human senses: verbal modes of time, literature and ethics (Tiƒ) and visual modes of space (Arts)
- Mechanical senses: clocks that measure time digitally and telescopes and microscopes which see all the fractal §cales of reality.

Thus the absurd belief of enzymen who worship mechanisms and its digital senses as superior to those of man, makes no ‘sense’ at all, as humans DO have their own visual and verbal, aesthetic and ethic mind mirrors of the whole.

When we define what we observe – a ωorld cycle in time-space of a series of Ærrows bundled in networks, through a life existence, perfectly structured, we come always to the concept of a mind, and a super organism, an Œ being, whose mind programs a vital space, constrained by a membrane that divides it from an outer Universe. This ∑œ, world cycle, network, ternary super organism, is what we see all around. And it acts as a mirror that collect information by extracting energy and warping into a meaningful form, the being it feeds and observes at the same time. The mirror language of the future, then will move the wave, the lanwave is formed, and as the mirror-seed generates an ∑world cycle it does so through a series of simple commands, or actions, ∆ a,e,i,o, u, the entropic actions of motions (accelerations), feeding (e), informing, reproducing into a clone offspring (o) and evolve socially into a universal û: ∆+1.

The first three actions can be considered primary actions, taken place mostly in a minimal number of ∆-scales of existence, the actions of reproduction and social evolution though are secondary action, running the slower program of time of ∆-scalar evolution. And yet they are all simultaneously prosecuted by each part of the being.

We use for the Mind, or sense of the whole, software or will or program of existence, of the hardware of max. i, or brain head-particle, linguistic class of the system the symbol ∆ º, as it conveys the sense of ‘location’ or @ describes the 3 parts of the system, and its spiral nature, a mouth in a membrane, which gives access to a cyclical territory or body-wave ending in a nucleus or singularity-mind; and it is also the site of the ‘cyclical actions of the system’

Physicists however, limited in their logic and philosophical reasoning, never cared that much for the ultimate meaning of what they measure. That is why philosophers called their theories ‘naive realism’ and Hawking affirms that philosophers of science criticize him because they don’t know mathematics (-;

It is not that the case, but rather the fact that a mere mathematical description of spatial measures, is NOT enough to explain the Universe. And the graph shows why. What physics has achieved is a rather perfect description of distances and motions from the perspective of light. But the minds that ‘gauge’ and order reality must be accounted for, through the study of its ‘specific metric equation:

O-mind x ∞ Universe = mapping.

This has been done increasing human accuracy with metal-eyes, telescopes and microscopes, LHC-like accelerators and electronic devices. But it still is only a light-mind. In reality in the Universe there can be infinite different minds and sciences of each mind. A dog’s mind will map the universe with smells – big atoms as pixels. It will be simpler than the pixels of instruments looking at light but still a valid mind.

So there are infinite mappings of the Universe from infinite points of view and multiple possible pixels.

But we are still humans and so when we try to do science we are limited to our senses and instruments. That is why we are not trying to study a ‘5th dimension’ based in minds of smells but one which goes merely further in our visual understanding of reality, albeit now considering also ‘the fringes’ of our universe (the strong force and gravitational force worlds of the inner atom and the outer intergalactic space) and specially considering the infinite clocks of time of our Universe.

But we still need a fixed point of view, some kind of ‘informative truth’ that doesn’t change even if we change the speed of time clocks and the size and scale of the space we observe.

What is then the still point of view of *the 5th dimension which ads on all possible space scales of the Universe and all possible time clocks and speeds?*

*Something must be ‘still’ still to make ‘information’ focused.*

We also use the symbol Œ for the 2 parts of the whole. or external view of the mind-being.

The mind is the language that embeds the game of existence as an ¬æ ∆ST BEING, in its bare-naked simplicity by reducing the Universe, which is *the game we describe, to a world, which is a linguistic less-dimensional image of the whole.*

But and this is the paradox of the minds of minds which is god (last post), the mind is a point-fractal with faster information than the whole it observes, with one more dimension, which brings, in i-logic arithmetic its infinite many-worlds.

This is the software of the mind. But the software can land in many hard-wares, or ‘particles-heads’, Tiƒ-systems, which will have a final point of view, fractal infinitesimal mapping-region on a domain it orders. The mind is the software of the brain, but it is the same brain-software that all other players of existence, which in each of its languages, is watching the same game.

Hence the same ternary universal grammar of all generated forms, which in a way express the mind’s view on the being itself.

The mind is truly the alpha and omega of the Universe, as it defines the boundaries of each whole, which breaks space-time into a fractal external and internal region, one ruled by the mind, which distorts and tries to break its existence within the Universe.

We could in that sense of the basic ceteris paribus models of reality we can make ‘work’, use the model of the Universe as an algorithm, playing in a mind of a binary language, O-time clocks and |-entropy lines. What that mind-program thinks, is all of us, virtual reflections of the ‘Mind’s Game’, on the motion of reality to which it tries to order and instill form, for the sake of beauty and perception of it.

*‘Gods are unmovable, the primary cause which moves the energy of its vital space’. ‘**We are all Gods.’ *Aristotle* *on the mind.

*‘Each point is a world in itself.’ *Leibniz, on the Monad, mind of space-time.

*‘Space is motion relative to a frame of reference.*‘ Einstein on the Non-Euclidean point of space-time.

In the graph, all systems have a mind, a concept closely related to that of a head-particle-linguistic class, or informative Tiƒ point of view of a super organism, as *minds are the points of maximal communication of a certain ‘space-time organic system’, and so most likely the mind is in the Tiƒ particle-head-linguistic class of the society*.

The mind is by essence selfish, subjective, with perspective, distorting with his will of actions the Universe, to make it converge into its inner mirror, dying and or reducing its total information in the process of obtention by the mind of an image of an outer self, with deception as the tool to camouflage its inherited weakness and obtain a token of energy and form of each other part of the Universe.

As the mind constructs its consciousness of being a knot of thought=language=perception, it crashes into itself – making it grow is stiffen its surroundings till all is silence, quietness, mind-view, 0-sum, void.

**TEMPORAL ANALYSIS: The mind – temporal concept vs. the brain – spatial concept.**

But as we progress on General Systems Theory AND the description of its Generators of Space-Time (both ab. GST), we shall see that the mind, a *TEMPORAL CONCEPT that relates to the existence in finite time of a **world cycle of a being, more than its spatial organic place in which the super organism process its information, might not be even into the being.*

SO WE DEFINE THE MIND AS THE TEMPORAL CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE SUPERORGANISM, INTIMATELY RELATED TO ITS WORLDCYCLE, WHICH CHANGES THE MIND POINT OF VIEW THROUGH 3 AGES OF CONSCIOUSNESS.

So now that we know that waves of light reproduce information instead of ‘moving’ really is obvious that ALL is about reproduction of information and the Universe is indeed a fractal of information. To fully grasp it we can bring…

If entities of the Universe use logic to calculate time in its different forms, from quantum logic to computer digital boolean logic to human logic, they use mathematical, visual topological languages to see space. We shall thus in this introduction to mental languages of the Universe (larger than the specific human languages of the human mind and artistic expressions of the I=eye<human wor(l)cycles, make a brief account of the ∆, •, s, t disciplines of mathematics:

** **The model of stience is simple, its falsification even more. We state that all what exists is a fractal being of ‘∆•st’, dust of space-time, with 3±o components, spatial entropy, temporal information (its energetic combinations), extended across several scales of relative size in space and speed of time clocks from forces to Universes (ab.∆), *which is apperceived in a Leibnizian way by a mind, the software of biological survival of the system.*

*So we need always to define the 4 elements of reality for any species, science, event and form AND language that will mirror the 4 elements of the Universe, with special emphasis on those case in the 4th element, the language-mind-software that runs the system.*

So the Correspondence of Mathematics and reality is also immediate, as mathematics have 3 branches: Space≈Geometry, Time≈Algebra and 5D≈Analysis. An the 4th element, the mind-language is mathematics itself.

**i-logic, TERNARY TIME: ****WHOLES: 3 PARTS & 3 X3+0 DIMENSIONS**

IN THE GRAPH, the different geometries looking upward into the elliptic less informative whole, and downwards into the more informative multiple cellular side. YET those systems behave euclidean, ‘longitudinally’ in a given scale of the fifth dimension once the being has either emerged as a seed of higher information from the lower ∆-1 scale, or as it dissolves into a whole ‘mass of dissolving dead parts’ in a hyperbolic path to the ∆-1 scale.

The symmetries between the three scales, topologies and time functions of the whole system commanded by a first center, 10th dimensional soul of will º∆º (a mind in the ∆º-self centred scale), gives us the 10 fundamental elements we must play to re-create reality.

Our interest, in a Universe in which there are constantly 3 choices of paths, S, T or ST to act or no to act (-1 action), with equal probabilities. is to map out a new existential algebra (ab. Æ) of all nature systems, with those 3 -1 possibilities.

Why the Universe has 3 positive ternary actions (and a negative, passive no-action) is *self evident:*

*-1: The mind might merely observe and stops motion (•),.*

*+3: Yet the system might evolve towards higher entropy (+Spe), higher information (+Tiƒ) or might reproduce its space-time in repetitive cycles, which on the long term will become a larger ‘whole’ (∆). *

*So the existence of 4 elements, ∆•ST, 3 of increasing motion along the 3 paths of space-time (S, st, ∆st) and one of growing stillness (•), implies a more complex logic with 4 potential actions for each bifurcation of past-present into the future.*

Of course, if we were to study a ‘fresh beginning’, the probabilities of those futures would be the same. But as the Universe is a game of memorial, informative motions, it follow that as the game proceeds, the future paths become determined by the long cyclical causality of individual actions and past cycles to be completed into the future.

So while paths do have a possibility to be modified without expenditure of energy, closed time cycles impose their ‘inertia’ and so the perfect potential ‘fourks’ of space-time (four point forks). The image is meaningful: as always we have a ‘lineal, entropic knife’; an informative, cyclical ‘spoon’ and an ∆•ST, 4-dimensional fork to both cut and form the food in present space-time. And you would choose, if given a single pick, the fork precisely because it can cut laterally and it can scoop the food. *Everywhere the rules of GST will enlighten ‘why things are as they are’; and the causes of the past or the fourkations of the future will be ternary±1. *

The causal ‘bifurcations of timespace’ thus are now ‘fourkations’ of space-time. And so the extraordinary one-dimensionality of human minds and its languages are out of meaning. Those arduous arguments between wannabe geniuses sponsoring their ‘point of single view’ as the real cause must cease. Ceteris paribus is simplification. For a being to exist, for a cause to act, for an event to happen in fact it will be because 3 past causes have converged to form a whole time-space ternary symmetry. Think of your actions, when you move, the mind first ‘thinks’ in the motion; the body then provides the energy; the limbs convert it into entropy. It would seem there is only one cause to action, the motion of the legs, but actually 3 actions converged in a ‘dharma of time-space’ to make it happen. Yet for the non-action only the mind is needed to stop action; which therefore is an ‘easier path’.

So the languages we use to portray that process are naturally different from the classic ones. And unlike analysis so close to the social scales of GST and fractals & topology, essentially ‘the’ spatial science of the fractal Universe, algebra as it is understood today, is basically a synoptic way to deal with topological and analytical theorems. And its proper structures, sets and groups must be understood as expressions of our social groups and ITERATIVE, MOVING laws, based in symmetries, transformations and motions through ‘polynomial scales’. But as the language is so different, we rather start afresh and include as we go along the main field worthy of classic algebra, which is NOT sets but group theory.

Temporal, Æxistential Algebra, studies the organisation of systems, through time=change; that is by means of transformations that provoke motions of a system, and create variations of systems, according to Group theory. Still it is worth to remember the basic elements of Algebra and its equivalence.

**The ternary operandi of Æ… and its symmetry with ∆ST elements.**

Actions and its causes are thus the ultimate inquire of existential algebra. Why and how motions of space-time happen. And what is the formal way to define them?

What we are interested here, beyond explaining the laws of classic algebra, such as group theory, with so many practical cases in science, which translate the TSymmetries and motions through ∆-scales, is the nature of existential algebra and the different equations of motions and species creations, through those motions and actions, which always render a certain ‘syntax’:

*Past ‘Operandi’ Future= present.*

The operandi between past and future, entropy and information, thus define what kind of present space-time event or entity appear to us. *Because we have 4 elements to define existence, operandi are many, not only a simple ± symbol to ad or rest the same type of beings or motions, as when physicists study only locomotions and reduce all to a Hamiltonian ± operandi between the two O-potential and |-kinetic ‘states’ of form-entropy.*

So each motion of time will have a different ‘algebraic operandi’, departing from our initial ‘Universal Grammar’.

We shall consider in this introduction the main operandi of the 7 motions of the Universe of which the 3 more important are:

*Locomotion*: Hamiltonian (Entropic, kinetic Past motion ± Future, Potential motion = Present (superposition motion of waves).

*Reproduction: *Past (field) x Future (information) = Present (iteration)

And the rule is simple, from classic algebra: a superposition or sum is of the same ‘species’; hence ‘energies (time-like)’ or ‘momentums’ (space-like), etc.

A Product can however combine different species. So it is normally a motion, which involves a space and time-like parameters:

Reproduction mixes the Spe and Tiƒ, different ‘genders’.

Finally, the 3rd mode of algebraic equations, polynomials/logarithms, correspond to the ∆-scale of growth or diminution.

So again we find an immediate relationship between the 3 elements of reality, S or T, ST and ∆ST, in its growing complexity and the 3 basic operandi of algebra, sum, product and polynomials.

What about the more complex scalar ‘motions’ of space-time? They are not that simple, as they combine elements of the pure ones. But as all ternary, Universal grammars, the complexity is born of the iteration of those elementary motions:

- Evolution is a change in the topology of a system, so essentially a process of space-time morphological in-form-ative change better described with topological elements.
- Growth and diminution involves reproduction and evolution of topological form and its inverse.
- Birth and extinction represent an ∆±1 change, combined with an ∆T increase of information or a loss of it all ∆S, which are often expressed with logarithmic scales.

And so most motions involve both a Past to future, ∆+1, social evolutionary arrow accompanied with changes in topology. And as such are pure ‘GST’ Ælgebraic motions, better described with the formalism of Æ and its symbols S>T, T<<S, ∑∆-1 Λ ∆… and so on.

Since in its most general form, algebra is the study of mathematical symbols and the rules for manipulating these symbols; the definition holds. And as algebra is a unifying thread of almost all of classic mathematics, so happens with Ælgebra.

In that regard, classic algebra (we shall call arithmetics) includes everything regarding those 3 operations, ±, x, % and log, x². And its symmetry as we have seen is immediate.

While modern algebra deals with the study of abstractions such as groups, rings, and fields; sets and Boolean algebras; and categories and elements… So we can subdivided Æ in 3±1 age subfields:

- Birth: THE study of æ proper (existential equations).
- Youth: of classic polynomial equations or arithmetics (S,t; st and ∆ systems in its interaction).
- Maturity: of abstract structures, or algebra proper concerned, with group theory (the internal social structures of the Universe).
- Old age: of inflationary information (set theory and other ‘weird’ algebras)
- Extinction: the transference from human minds to digital minds (computer algebra, boolean algera)

** ∆•st of space-time and its limits in space, time, ∆-scales and mind perception.**

So space-time is always in its whole ‘plenum beings’ made of 3 elements, which in topology, are called:

-Tiƒ: the singularity or monad-mind in its centre of maximal communication

-Spe: the membrane or limiting, hard entropic circular system that encloses

-ST: the space-time much larger reality that mixes lineal expansive outer membranes and internal singularities:

ALL systems of physics and biology and sociology show the same ternary elements: the membrane singularity and space-time between them.

In the graph physical systems, from electromagnetism to fluid dynamics to gravitational gradients, charges in physics, have the 3 parts. In biology they are cellular protein membranes and nuclei and cytoplasm, skins and brains and organs. In sociology they are national borders and capitals, and the internal territory. In non-euclidean geometry (right side, the inner parts cannot reach the membrane, and so it appears as a relative infinity, and the central singularity (A point), connects with all the points within the membrane, as its focus of information. It is that constant interaction between membrane and singularity what moods the internal vital space of energy/momenta, of the being.

In physics all Maxwell’s laws can be deduced from the existence of an external circular membrane (magnetism). So happens in gravitation, (orbits which ‘scan a bidimensional aerolar surface). And all systems will be centred in a singularity (attractive vortex, charge).

Moreover we shall see that TIME has also those limiting membranes (death) and informative centres (seeds of information at birth).

And the scalar Universe will have also those non-E unreachable limits, (Universal Constant limits of c-speed and To temperature).

All this *is the essence of topology that defines an ‘open ball’ as the space-time volume limited by a central singularity and an external membrane, which are NOT perceivable, included within the open ball. *

So the concept of finite infinities, limiting membranes in space, time (birth-death) and scales (limiting unreachable constants of maximal information and maximal extension) are essential to understand formally and logically the Universe.

*We are limited in time by the birth-death finite enclosure of our world cycle of existence, in space by the skin/membrane that breaks space-time into us; and in the scales of size of the ‘5th dimension’ by the increasing ‘blurred uncertainty and dark spaces’ which limits our perception of them beyond the ∆±3 scales of atoms and galaxies.*

And so we are also limited IN THE KNOWLEDGE THE MIND MIGHT ACQUIRE OF ALL THE INFORMATION OF THE UNIVERSE, WHICH ONLY A BEING HOLDS ABOUT ITSELF, making ‘absolute truth’, 1, in terms of probability, only ‘existing’ in the being in itself.

Those four limits of birth and death, of absolute seeds of information (seminal seed) and entropy (explosive death); of singularity (the mind of information) and membrane (the skin) in space; of organisation above and below, in ∆±1 levels; and in knowledge provided by the limits of the language ARE ESSENTIAL TO ANY UNDERSTANDING OF MAN AS A LIMITED BEING, IN A ∞ UNIVERSE, BUT MAN DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THOSE LIMITS. Hence the astounding arrogance of scholars, scientists, dogmatic axiomatic methods of ‘truth’ (Hilbert in mathematics, which still denies Godel’s incompleteness theory). And the result of course is that you have a human astounding ego, who thinks to be so special, so unique, so unlimited, so galactic and Universal and YET IT IS SO IGNORANT. And all what it does is to hold its pretension of infinity.

**The decametric scale: 3 x 3 +o = 10.**

‘The universe is written in the language of geometry, lines, spheres and triangles’. Galileo had a point – all reductionist views of reality are indeed half-truths. But in this case it is a huge truth.

*The languages of the Universe are mainly 3, Topology, the most advanced form of geometry with a ‘bit of inner motion’, which describe the 3 ‘timespace’ only forms of reality – hence the determinism of topological evolution and the awesome capacity to describe it all with the ternary generator of those 3 topologies. *

Regarding triangles, intuitively humans both in earlier religion of words (Judaism) and Pythagorean religions of the number, were considered the ‘tetraktys’ and symbol of the ‘tetragrammaton’ (graph) – the symbol of it all.

As indeed, the 3 topological organs of all systems (lineal, toroid limbs/fields; hyperbolic, body-waves and spherical, informative head-particles, shown in the graph, which need only a little imagination to convert into a woman’s body – first surface, a leg, second, and a head 3rd one), suffice to create reality.

Yet as all ‘is scalar’, all subdivides into ‘ternary fractal sub-elements’. So to include the co-existence in the 5th dimension of parts and wholes, we can immediately subdivide the 3 topologies into 3 ‘sub-elements’ and put them in each of the corners of the tetraktys/tetragrammaton; *while the central point, which is perfectly connected to all others, is the soul-mind-0-point, 10th dimension – the system that is apperceives the whole, connects its and tries to preserve it, through the world cycle of being.*

(The reader should get accustomed to the ‘taste’ of GST which is the HOMOLOGIC, ISOMORPHIC METHOD, of putting always a physical, biological and socio-economical example of the 3 main sub-disciplines of knowledge to show the unity of it all as we illustrate reality).

Alas, the growth in the ‘5th dimension of scales’ happen through 10 dimensional ‘social organisation’.

Thus the previous graphs of Eames’ ‘Powers of 10’ is also the game of social existence.

Since it is also the number of quanta of space-time needed either in frequency or in population (spatial organic or temporal world cycle view of a system), either through time or space to create a new *social scale (ab. §) that ‘becomes a new larger functional whole’ able to apperceive and process entropy-motion, informative forms and combine them through the ‘3rd corner’ to ’emit seminal’ reproductive particles, coordinated by the central whole.*

Let us though then, once this is understood depart from reductionist ‘mathematical physics’ , and realise that what truly MATTERS IS organic FUNCTION, NOT the triangular form, beyond the obvious fact it is the most perfect ‘packed’ functional way to put 10 elements together.

So when we study specific species what we shall see is that ‘fractal points’ of space-time (beings) gather through networks of entropy, information and reproduction (in man, the digestive: spe, blood, st, Head, Tiƒ systems, which define our physiological structure), into a being. So humans in medicine are DEFINED by 3 x 3 + O sub-systems to which fractal points≈ cells attache themselves. This is the essential formal way to study in detail beings: *through its 10 sub-dimensions of being; WHICH FOR the whole known Universe would look like thi:*:

In the graph in the creation of the whole Universe, and any of its fractal parts, ‘worlds, super organisms or island-universes’:

The being passes through scales of organisation that can be put in symmetry with the 3 topologies, 3 ages, 3 scales and final ‘warping mind/program of action’ of the being as it emerge into the new plane.

WE ARE ALL 10-DIMENSIONAL SCALAR BEINGS, when we consider this more ‘correct’ formal approach that the concept of the ‘scalar 5th dimension’ (the use of 5D though is useful for general studies of all those scales, given its METRIC FUNDAMENTAL S x T = K equation; and further on, it is a good first intro for the sceptic 4D physics that respects more the correspondence with its 4D formalism – but I ultimately abandoned it, leaving the concept of the 5th dimension for discussions on the inverse arrows of entropy and information).

So the ‘numerology’ explained is rather simple with 2 clear numbers, the ±3 and the 9+0=10. Then on those themes we shall find some fascinating variations. We already talked of the +3 constant, the pi-cycle of time, where 3 lineal diameters convert into a whole time cycle with 2 dimensions.

But then why pi is not exactly 3? Because its curvature varies as we change slightly the ‘density and geometry’ of information of the space-time plane, so in black holes the curvature of such awesome c-speed event horizon accelerating inwards do come closer to 3. Still we do have here the first fundamental ‘event of space-time of the Universe’: 3 lines of entropy becoming a cycle of information:

3 D = π; whereas the porous ‘0.14’ holes between cycles will be found to have a fundamental function on ‘organisms’ with a spherical pi-cycle membrane isolating it from the external world.

While on the other hand – π, will turn out to be also a universal constant the e number, used for a different ‘common event of space-time’ the emergence by social reproduction and organisation or inversely by decay and death, the dissolution of a being through its ∆-scales.

Thus we can see then all systems as 3 x 3 +o scalar social organisms, with 3 dimensions of space, time, and ∆-size become warped in a new whole, which EMERGES into the new plane of existence in space, when it is COMPLETED, and a new world opens to it in scale (as when a baby is born) or emerges earlier.

Now it is important that you realise that despite the claim of ‘exactitude’ of mathematical physics, there is nothing exact about it, but rather fluctuations and variations a*round the perfect tetraktys being; only the whole display the perfect immortal game of time-space, we are all ‘nebulous fleeting platonic shadows of the GST canon and its games of topo-bio-logical existence, in S∆T. *(For example, physicists need Wilson’s renormalisation tools to include the effects of ∆±1 scales in a given system; often put ‘ad hoc’ to match experience; differential equations that tabulate actions across several ∆-scales are not SOLUBLE only by approximations, etc. etc. AS IN THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE, ultimately every fractal domain of 10-dimensional organic existence with an apperceptive monad at its centre does make its own calculations which will have hidden variables for the external being – so something as simple *as the motion of 3 bodies in gravitational attraction CANNOT be solved exactly.) *

This does not mean though that the Universe is chaotic but that obviously the astounding arrogance of the selfie-scientist-mathematician claiming to have the exact language of God and absolute truth/knowledge/information about any entity is just more of what Humans do best, pumping their ego to ‘galactic, Universal hyperboles. Ultimately’ only the Universe has all the knowledge/information about itself’ Haldane).

Further on only the Universe is the immortal, perfect super organism and that allow us fleeting variations of the ‘platonic canon’ to exist and fancy our imperfections.

So those ∆•ST variations around those TETRAKTYS scales and numbers make the the morphological growth of forms between scales through the palingenesis of an i-logic memorial repetitive being born out of a seed of information, fun to study – *they are, we are, the details of Γ•∆.*

Then as the system is born from an initial seed – particle/semen/memetic prophet of the world – it will reproduce into parallel particles/cells/believers minds, and grow till it emerges as a whole new super organism in another plane with close to decametric scales of growth.

Alas, a religious subconscious, memetic collective civilisation (social systems), a biological being or a crystal world will be born.

IT IS THIS GAME OF CREATION OF COMPLEX SOCIAL ORGANISMS, THROUGH SCALES AND cycle of existence, WHAT THE UNIVERSE that constructs ONCE AND AGAIN logic ∆•st, 10 dimensional games of BEINGS is all about.

The final epistemological element of all systems that co-exist in several planes of the 5th dimension is the organic structures and biological properties it displays due to such co-existence symbiotic thanks to the metric equation, as smaller parts code the information of larger ones that provide them with energy and motion, so both scales become symbiotic.

The co-existence of planes of space-time can only be explained through organicism one of the two eternal philosophies of science.

This, true scientists know, as the mechanist view of physics was too simple and rather theological. Indeed, as Leibniz put it to Newton, a mechanical model of the cosmos, needed a God that started and created the mechanism.

While an organism, which is a system that co-exists in several scales of size, from smaller cellular/atomic scales, to individual thermodynamic/organic scales, to social, gravitational/ecosystemic scales, can easily reproduce by emitting seminal seeds of information in a lower scale, which then organise back, emerging again into the whole system, and further on can evolve socially into larger scales.

In this manner the Universe becomes a self-reproductive organism of information, and each of its parts becomes also a self-organising system made to the image and likeness of the whole – with no need of a mechanical clock to put it in motion, as Newton and Kepler thought.

Such view of the Universe and all its parts was called the organic view, and the aim of the science was considered to find a formalism of mathematical and logic nature, able to translate this more evolved philosophy of science in a model that without renouncing to the precision of simplex physical models, had the complexity required to explain not only the ‘how’ but also the why of all sciences and it species.

The science that studies the organic nature of the Universe, its planes of space-time and the common laws or ‘isomorphisms’, which exist between them, is called General systems Theory (Ab. GST). However it is simpler and more realistic to consider merely the formalism of the 5th dimension of space-time without any prior jargon as that developed by Systems Sciences. Even if we acknowledge the fact that this blog is the only ‘formal’, logic-mathematical model of both disciplines, known commonly the science of Complexity.

There are other efforts worth to notice. Notably the work done in Santa Fe Institute and the congresses of the International Systems Sciences Society, among collaborative efforts and the work of Mr. Troncale at Ponoma U. among individual researchers have tabulated many isomorphisms in the Universe (self similar laws across different disciplines of science, which as it happens are ordered by space-time planes of relative size, hence according to ∆ST metric: fig.2). But collection of data is only the 1st step of the scientific method, which requires to fit data into a ‘general mathematical and logic model’ good enough to fit new discoveries in different fields – to test its veracity.

In any case since there has been always a ‘Philosophy of Science’, or discipline of disciplines, General Systems can be considered merely the formal attempts to convert into hard science the ‘scientific philosophy of an organic Universe’, as opposed to the other simpler model of a ‘mechanical one’.

*And so we could put in both sides – the simpler, more accurate mechanical model vs. the Organic model, most of the thinkers of the past. Mechanism is easier so it has triumphed, Organicism has taken more time to become – still needs a lot to be done – a standardize system.*

*Thus the 5D model fits all the data of all the sciences of those scales t*o the extent of the knowledge of this polymath writer. Thus it is probably the better tested model in *terms of the Principle of Correspondence and Ockham’s principle (a theory that fits more data in simpler laws, is the most truthful.)*

Thus the site studies mainly those 10 isomorphisms in great detail ³.

The whole site, on general systems sciences, when I rewrite it properly, will be a small encyclopedia of all sciences, seen through the focusing, orderly mirror of the 3+3 Dimensions of the Universe, its 9 planes and scales and isomorphisms. I started to do this, in august 2015. Though the work is much older.

While the model was published in a very reduced format in a series of peer reviewed conferences at ISSS during the last decade, this blog is the place where I will pour 2 decades of independent research in the aforementioned formalism.

You might then wonder why nothing of this is well-known in science (and why this blog i assume won’t change that trend).

In the field of social sciences we explain the anthropomorphic causes. In essence, humans as all systems are ∆-centered, and so they don’t like objective science. They like myths and that make them the center of the Universe. So religions are always more successful. And i attribute to that fact the delay on understanding the 5th dimension: human anthropomorphism. Since the 5th dimension shows an organic, ‘vital’ Universe ruled by Absolute relativity. Since humans simply occupy a relative world-plane of an infinite 5th dimension, self-centered in its point of view, an infinitesimal point with no importance whatsoever, ruled by the same laws that define the form and functions of all other systems and ‘scalar social herds and superorganisms’ .

Thus the ‘organic philosophy’ of the 5th dimension of isomorphic, scalar space time (∆ST), called ‘General Systems Theory (∆ST) ‘ is a philosophy of an organic vital Universe:

*“All type of Universal systems can be described as social networks of energy and information. Its similar=isomorphic laws are the content of the formalism of the 5th dimension, from where we can deduce the main laws of each science that studies a relative ‘scale’ of spatial size of the social, organic Universe, from physics which studies its smaller and larger atomic and galactic scales to biology and social sciences which study its intermediate life and human scales.”*

So what is really time? Change≈motion, as we see the passing of time when something changes, hence it moves externally in space or internally changes its form, its information. AND SO two fundamental modes of change=time exist:

Physical time, which is change in your lineal loco motions or translations in space, well studied with the formula v=s/t and the ad ons of Einstein, in which time is merely the parameter of space (the fourth dimension of space) needed to measure those motions.

But then there is change in the JUST DESCRIBED CYCLICAL INFORMATION, FORM of time cycles and systems, and this is biological change, which we shall see IS also the basis of historic change as we are BIOLOGICAL beings. In this different form of change, what matters is the change of information, which is MORE complex than entropy, lineal motions. And so there are several different forms of CHANGEs of information, which can be studied all together as a CAUSAL series OF CHANGES, WHICH TOGETHER FORM THE LIFE-DEATH CYCLE, or ‘world cycle’ in 5D jargons. The main types of biological and sociological changes thus can be described as Aristote did with the causal world cycle of informative life-death changes:

- ∆-1: Generation, ∆ºs: growth, ∆st: evolution, ∆t:perception of flows of information, (∆s: Locomotions), diminution and dissolution (extinction)

But with lineal time you won’t understand all those life-death cycles of all systems of space-time, including the whole Universe.

Lines of time, without FORM, INFORMATION, relevant to the essence of what time is, but just as an v=s/t secondary parameter in the measure of space and its ‘locomotions’, DOES NOT reveal the full power of those EFE equations, which are NOT lineal.

And yet physicists keep trying to approach all cyclical motions into lineal locomotions, which is the only time=change physicists study of the 7 sub-species of times=changes, already defined by Aristotle, (which he roughly divided as we do, in changes in the in/form/ation of beings, as evolution, which biology studies; change in the mind position and control of its body-motions, as in process of perception; and so on, again another HUGE field completely ignored by lineal time sciences).

Now if physicists stick to their profession, which is the study of locomotions in physical space, ALL their talk on time locomotions, despite being not that important, is useful and MAKES SENSE, and that is fair enough, but time ‘cycles’ are many. So it is important to understand from the beginning this concept. And have a bit of healthy cynicism about their dogmas.

All those changes=time cycles that trans-form the information of beings ARE also time-space changes, which mankind HAS shunned off as if they ‘were’ a different thing, since Physicists became the leading scientists of humanity, mostly because they became over powerful, as the makers of lineal motions/weapons/machines. But power is not truth. Praxis is not theory. So while acknowledging the power of physicists and the usefulness of their discoveries, as a philosophy of science I am not ‘impressed’ just by lineal weapons and artillery masters’ thoughts, as Galileo pretended.

As it is a *new dawn for all sciences, never seen since Mr. Galileo put time to measure space, with huge benefits for our sciences of measure, notably physics and the making of machines and cannonballs. As all sciences use time as its fundamental parameter, and so all have new revelations coming from the switch from time lines to time cycles.*

The funny thing about physicists is that they know I am right, because they do know modern physics, when Einstein and Planck, my favs, crashed the delusions of Newton and Galileo absolute space (which was the Plenum, sensorial organ of Yhwh according to Newton) where he put it its creatures on-a-box. Einstein found there were infinite time clocks. And so he quipped, ‘Leibniz (the discovery of fractal timespace he called it relational time-space, ridiculing Newton for his religious thoughts) is right, there are infinite time clocks on the Universe’. And Planck that the Universe was spiritual broken in in finite parts with energy and motion, and so ultimately we are made of space-time ‘actions’, of motions with form.

So what we say here does ONLY contradict, the already dismissed Newtonian absolute space-time paradigm created by God, as the plenum of his body… Bull$hit. It Corresponds (fundamental principle of truth) and explains further modern physics.

** MATHEMATICS, ITS SUB-DISCIPLINES**

**The evolution and qualification of maths as a mind language.**

Languages therefore as a ‘defined species’ dominant in Tiƒ, temporal information, but also as pure still ‘spatial, synchronous’ mapping of reality in lesser space (not all the info specially the motion fits in a brain), do have certain properties, which can be observed in their evolution.

FIRST THEY MOVE FROM STATICS INTO DYNAMICS, from bidimensional pure information (as the page you are reading in 2 dimensions) to 3, 4, 5 dimensional description, reaching more complexity by adding motion to the ‘first still picture’ and the other time dimensions. 3 examples:

Maths started as static bidimensional geometry, which is now topology with motion; photography (the future computer mind) started as bidimensional static, then bidimensional motion (film), now is working in 3Dimensions of space (using the holographic principle) and one of motion, and soon, *inside the mind of robots that will apperceive reality in images, will add the 5th dimension of control of an outer-machine, beyond the chip, max. i = min. space enlarged into the whole world it will act upon directly.*

**The generator of maths**

The generator equation of mathematics is thus simple both in space (the 3 organs above) and time (the evolution of each discipline into higher motion in space and more dimensions of information in time, culminating soon through Boolean Algebra into the creation of the mind of robots in 5D).

*Γ (Space):* Space is studied by geometry, time by algebra &, the 5th dimension by analysis.

*Γ (Time): *Spe (Geometry>Analytic Geometry>Time Geometry > 5D Topology) x Tiƒ (Arithmetic > Algebra) = 5D Planes (calculus>analysis)

So we can either study in ‘space’, as it is NOW, all those fields of spatial, temporal and organic, scale mathematics and its 3 fundamental sub disciplines, topology, algebra and analysis.

Or we can consider each subject as it evolved through the different degrees of awareness of reality; *of any language of the mind, which reaches ‘complexity’ (5D co-existence) and freedom (motion), as it evolves from a simpler age of dogmatic **absolute truths to the variations of the language.*

IN THAT SENSE, the supposed superior truths of mathematics as opposed to verbal thought, is ONLY the consequence of the dogmatic first age of all languages, with simpler forms; as when words became the language of legal power and the pharaoh said ‘it has been written’. And it was law. Truths turn out as system evolves more probabilistic in options, less defined by a synoptic language, as only the whole has all the information about the Universe.

*In this post we do a fast scanning of those ages to summary the fundamental laws of mathematics and its 3 parts, and show this evolution to further complexity.*

*THUS corresponding to the 3 parts of the Universe, there are 3 types of mathematical sub-disciplines:*

* ∆nalysis, STopology and ¬Ælgebra. In the sub posts we shall do the synchronous NOW study of its ‘organic parts’ in more detail.*

For example the evolution of Geometry specified in the previous generator has reached increasing degrees of awareness to finally becoming a full-fledged tool to analyze from a spatial perspective all temporal forms and 5D scales. So:

– It was first bidimensional Geometry of static Space (S-perception) in Greek thought. Then it became Analytic Geometry, which grew to represent the 3 forms of time, through Se-toroid-lineal coordinates, To-polar-cyclical coordinates and STi-Plane coordinates. This time geometry finally expanded to the 3 ‘5D topological perceptions of space-time’:

Thus in the XIX century, the perception of higher planes of the 5th dimension (elliptic geometry-General relativity-cosmic scales) and lower ones (hyperbolic geometry-quantum spaces) was added to the direct perception of a single plane of existence (Euclidean geometry). While topology allowed to apply those 3 external views to the internal motions and changes of the inner space-time of a particle-point, and finally fractal geometry completed the perception of 5D with Geometry.

The same evolution can be considered for the more complex Algebraic and Analytic branches.

The structure of this and 2nd-3rd rank posts is that of an encyclopaedia of mathematics, when it is completed by me and many future researchers is chronological (now work is under construction, in such a huge field, i just put the scaffolding, and from time to time I ad parts:

First we explain the 3 ages of mathematics and so we can translate all its postulates and theories to GST.

In this post we develop a synoptic analysis of those ages.

Then we complete the work with the full-blown model non-e mathematics, non-algebra, ∆nalysis and the pangeometries of the mind who reduces reality with i-logic mathematics to fit all its information in the second level of posts.

**i-Logic Mathematics as realist sciences.**

The formalism humans use to observe time and space is called (verbal) logic and (digital) mathematics.

Such is the way humans observe reality with logic words and digital geometry. So the realism of logic and mathematics must be absolute and if it is not is because we still need to evolve both languages to make it closer to reality.

tHIS is the origin of Non-Aristotelian logic and Non-Euclidean mathematics, the needed upgrading of those sciences to express better the fractal properties of scalar space and multiple causality of a universe made with 3 arrows NOT one of time.

Logic Mathematics, the forma sciences of time and space, which science uses to descry the Universe are the time and space forms of the mind and can be evolved into higher models as we can closer to our understanding of what time and space is, which we explained in the pervious post.

So to introduce the formal model of GST (general systems theory), we must introduce its formalism, the formalism of the Genrator of Space-time, its mathematical and logic equations.

In that sense as all is space and time, mathematics and logic are both idealist sciences not idealist languages – as all sciences are. More so logic of time and mathematics of space, the languages of the fundamental elements of the Universe, as they serve a survival purpose for the species that speak it: to mirror in the mind, the outer reality and connect the internal and outer world of the being.

THUS LOGIC MATHEMATICS IS THE LANGUAGE THAT BETTER REFLECTS THE INFINITE SCALES OF THE 5TH DIMENSION AND ALL ITS SPECIES. Hence the U±∞ tag for this post.

This realist fact is essential to set the ‘boundaries’ of efficiency of our mathematical elements that mirror reality. It means we reject ‘modern mathematics’, an offspring of the German idealist ‘school’ of science, which has taken the ego-trip of human only intelligence to its paroxysm, with the tandem Cantor-Hilbert that ‘imagined sets, points, lines and planes’.

The units of mathematics are the fractal point in geometric space and the social number in algebraic time, and they must be returned to the centre of the science – and reject the axiomatic method, of ‘human minds’ self-appointed seers of truth. Since Godel already proved it is an incomplete truth that needs experimental evidence.

Experience must in mathematics as in any other science to be the final check on the logic theories discovered. In this manner mathematics is much more fruitful as it provides constantly new ‘insights’ on the structure of mathematics.

A simple example will suffice. Fermat’s last theorem: X³ + Y³ ≠ Z³ proves that space and time are bidimensional, NOT tridimensional, as there are not 3-dimensional numbers. How mathematics ‘knows’ it? Because GEOMETRY is the linguistic mirror of space and follows the same laws.

Another example is the structure of reality in ‘o-points’, minds which are frames of reference, its vital space and the membrane that acts as boundaries. Well, we do need for all mathematical statements a frame of reference, and there are basically 3 which correspond to the only 3 topologies which correspond to the only 3 type of organs of nature. Again, this ternary structure reflects mathematically the 3 organs of reality.

In fact, multiple equations and functions of mathematics find no solution when there are no ‘boundaries’ established, showing how both concepts relate. Solutions are then integrals limited by the function of the external membrane. Reality indeed is ‘limited’ by the survival efficiency of its forms. So only proper solutions survive.

In the more amenable internal surface of a brain language truth can be deformed in greater measure by the subjective point of view. So there are distorted theories of mathematics as in all sciences, which are only half-truths. And the ego expands them to full meaning as physicists do with the restricted concept of gas entropy. So ‘parts’ of algebra, which have some meaning for certain questions of reality – as the composition of parts and wholes, which is what set theory studies, hence a sub discipline of 5D mathematics – have been blown up by ego-centered german idealists (Cantor-Hilbert) to become the ‘truth of all other mathematical systems’. And this has harm enormously the comprehension of the fractal point of space and social number in time, which are the units both of the mathematical and the real Universe.

So the main task of T.œ in the science of mathematics is return to the meaningful, classic age, and put back mathematics and logic with the nature of reality, as it is and a proper evolution of mathematical thought would enlighten it.

**The 3 parts of mathematics correspond to the 3 parts of reality.**

Mathematics is the most experimental of all sciences, due to the fact that its 3 disciplines are homeomorphic with the 3 elements of T.Œ: 5D analysis, space geometry and the logic operandi of ‘time algebra’.

Thus for starters the easiest way to translate mathematics to study knots of fractal space-time cycles, is to consider that the 3 main branches of mathematics are related to the 3 elements of the Universe:

- Geometry relates to space. Hence it merely needs an upgrading of continuous single space-time into fractal space-times in which ‘each point is a world in itself’; a fractal, Non-AE point, Œ. So we must complete the 5 postulates of Non-E geometry, as mathematics only resolved the 5th. We shall also consider what of the different topologies exist in the bidimensional space-time reality (2-manifolds).
- Sequential Algebra of growing social numbers, corresponds to the 5th dimension’s Informative-Time order of growing societies/numbers from past to future. At its birth, because Algebra is pure arithmetic and the order of numbers from minor to major, is self-evident (5D future arrow of wholes), the logic of future algebraic complex systems is yet not merged, in its Pure Aristotelian Style. Moreover it is a single arrow logic, A->B, which will have enormous implications.

- Analysis which studies the laws of social scales and planes of the 5th dimension, its indivisible, infinitesimal Œ-points that become whole; societies or Superorganism and Planes of existence. So we shall interpret Analysis in terms of the underlying equations of existential algebra, which gather infinitesimal indivisibles (.n-1) into Universal Wholes, (Un+1).

This is the easy way to analyse, and teach the foundation of mathematics: understanding both synchronic and diachronically its direct relationship with reality. And scrapping all excess of… the formal nonsense of Philosophers of mathematics.

Indeed diachronically Geometry was born of the measure of fields and the observation of moon and astronomical cycles.

*Numbers and algebra express the laws of a sum of objects that gather into social groups: ∑∆-1 ≈@number, group*

Analysis of the study of parts that become wholes (integration) and forms of space that vary in time (derivation).

Now let us try a more complex thorough definition with the jargon of ∆ST or ‘Tœ’ (a theory of everything):

*Definition of mathematics : ‘i-logic mathematics is an experimental science, based in the fact that it studies the laws of Fractal Space-time, (ab. ∆ST), the substances of which all beings are made, focusing on its highest synthetic conceptualisation, the Fractal Generator, Γ, with 3 sub-disciplines:*

*Γeometry, which studies the forms in space of all universal systems, departing of its natural units, the fractal point, the waveline and the plane-network and its topological structures defined by the Fractal Generator in synchronous states, Sp<ST>Tƒ.*

*‘∆nalysis’, which studies the social scales of the 5th dimension, expressed through its time events of ∫∂, integration and derivation and actions along its world cycles, focusing on the fractal generator in diachronic state: ∆-1 Tƒ ∑> ∆Sp > ∆+1 ST > ∆ Tƒ << ∆-1 Sp*

*¬ Ælgebra, which studies the internal logic structures of the Fractal Generator, its actions and symmetries in space and time, through its discontinuous variable units, the social number.*

The previous definition is more complex than a simple definition of Analysis of 5D planes, Geometry of each of its systems in space, and the algebraic study of the ternary temporal logic causality of its space-time events. But it remains still clear that the true elements of mathematics are not sets and undefined concepts (Cantor, Hilbert’s axiomatic method), but the classic 3 elements of ‘numbers’ (Algebra), ‘points’ (Geometry) and Operandi (Algebra and Analysis).

From points then we derive, the lines, planes, and logic of similarity that completes geometry.

From numbers, we derive variables, functions and functionals manipulated with operandi that reflect the logic motions in time of the different actions of beings.

And as a branch of Algebra, of special extension, given that it studies the fractal structure of more actions, including the world cycle through scales of the 5th dimension, there is Analysis.

So the realism of mathematics derives of the fact that we are not placed in fractal space-time, we ARE FRACTAL SPACE-TIME.

The issue of the realist foundations of mathematics as an experimental science should have long been resolved by experimental proofs (mathematics is the language with more applications to reality) and formally by Gödel’s theorem of incompleteness. But Platonism is so ‘entrenched’ on mathematics and physics that nobody seemed to have taken seriously Godel, except his friend Einstein:

Truth can only be proved by the connection between reality and the language, as the language itself does not provide enough consistency to prove its truth, only its coherence.

Einstein thus quipped ‘I know when mathematics are truth – consistent within the language – but not when they are real’. And Lobachevski affirmed they should be tested experimentally. Einstein though soon felt under the spell of the Axiomatic method of Hilbert, and did away with ether, setting a one hundred years confusion on the nature of reality.

And so what we would have expected in objective terms – the evolution together of the pan geometry of Lobachevski and the experimental method of mathematical physics, which so many fruits of knowledge had brought to mankind during the age of mathematical analysis floundered. Both mathematics and physics became ‘imagined sciences’, in which substance – the fractal point, the social number, the space-time bidimensional system or plane – became imagined. It is important thus to trace the historic origin of this trend in the same german idealist school that brought us ‘probabilities as the substance of reality’, ‘nazi numbers’ tagged on the wrists of people – today substituted by credit numbers in the globalised capitalism, and ‘communist’ masses of ‘undistinguishable’ human points controlled by the ‘party’ entity, as expressions of what the ‘superior human mind’ could do to classify without respect the laws of nature.

A brief comment on terminology, which I confess my ‘creative mind’ has a hard time to maintain always with the same ‘script’ (sorry). There is no doubt that the big languages of man, words, numbers and images respond to the same ternary syntax, SVO in languages, X(ts) operand Y(st), red(s)<yellow(st)≈green(ts)>blue(t)… So GST will find far more similarities than differences with all the knowledge of mankind, making corrections to ensemble them all. But some sciences will need more corrections, being biology, as the closest in observation, the more accurate. In mathematics of the three disciplines, ∆nalysis, the most modern is the less incorrect – truly a wonder of the mind; geometry has to complete its non-euclidean revolution explaining why points do let parallels through it (as fractal points with volume of information).

But Algebra is all together another kind of subject with a huge formal, axiomatic, pedantic jargon and virtual foundation (set theory), which is hard to adapt, as it deforms excessively the *true units of algebra in its three scales, numbers, equations and structures. *And further on uses single aristotelian logic, which is not truly fit to dynamize the Universe.

So in algebra we shall not follow the standard method of expressing the laws discovered by science with constant comments, small corrections and parallels with GST but start from scratch defining ¬Ælgebra, Existential Algebra, Non-Aristotelian, Non-Euclidean algebra, (ab. ¬Æ, Ælgebra, ¬Algebra). This i know will put off mathematical scholars but I have given up after so many frustrations any attempt to please and upgrade mankind’s mind in my life and now just try to build a coherent blog for future human or mechanical minds to explore. So as we have no pity for the millions of physicists who stubbornly get stuck in lineal time, entropic big-bangs, 11 dimensional strings, without understanding it – but not willing to change, in mathematics we simply reject set theory and the axiomatic method; as another waste of time, human biased ego-trip of truth and will re-start algebra by going back to its simplex numerical principles.

In fact, only biology but NOT evolution in its popular confusion of individual struggle with species struggle and professional denial of the intelligent program of creation (three only topological variations) which is of course impersonal, but limits differentiation of species, comes out quite as it is. *Lobachevski not Cantor and Godel not Hilbert should have carried the day with their emphasis on experimental proofs for mathematics, and those are our masters. Leibniz, not Newton, Bohm, not Bohr, should have carried the day in the concepts of relative, fractal relational space-time and the deterministic nature of a Universe (with its ternary probabilities). And so on.*

Let us then review the mathematical principles of its three ∆analytical Spatial, geometric, and temporal, algebraic parts.

**Non-Euclidean, vital topologies, the construction of networks.**

The 4 branches of mathematics, an experimental science that mimics the laws of space and time follow closely the FOUR elements of reality ∆ºST: ∆nalysis, T-algebra of sequential numbers, geometry of space and then the philosophy of mathematics, and its ‘axiomatic methods’ of truth, distorted by the limits of the human mind. Let us consider the simplest of those disciplines, geometry, and evolve it further to match the ∆ºst universe.

It follows easily that the true r=evolution of GST is an expansion of our methods of use of mathematics and languages of time-space to describe a Universe, where fractal points communicate flow of expansive entropy S< T and informative, dimensional particles/knots of information, T>S, which constantly establish an intelligent dynamic series of networks in search of a conserved, body-present wave equilibrium; and so fractal networks of many points are born.

Fractal points (5th Non-Æ postulate), are mind-like points, crossed by infinite cyclical parallels, timespace cycles that exchange spatial entropy and temporal form.

So we redefined the first axiom of Euclid, defining a point with ‘breath’, provided by the flows of entropy, energy and information.

And for that reason we define lines with ‘breath’ as a sum of points that move in present waves with momenta, which communicate two such points.

And so finally we define a topological networks, as a fractal plane made of such lines integrated into a present super organism of energy.

It only rests to define properly the third postulate/axiom of congruence in terms of ‘parallelism’ (similar points collaborating together to form larger wholes) and perpendicularity, (points in a darwinian collision of ‘existential momentums’, extracting their entropy and energy), and all the intermediate states that will define how relative points relate to each other.

In this manner a natural vital topology of existence arouses as we expand the concepts of non-euclidean postulates to line-waves and topologic networks and knots of time-space cycles.

**Similarity and congruence**

As stated the key postulate becomes the third postulate, which establishes the rules of engagements between arrows of time that form ‘complex tensors of existence (vectorial maths have an interesting use to interpret those ‘tensors’, specially in the conceptual understanding of events of mathematical physics).

As two points will communicate with its 3 arrows, displaying different events:

Entropy big-bang expansive, T≤ ∑S,destructive events; Informative flows which often fusion two elements into a smaller, denser organic whoel: ∑ S>T.

And the commonest dynamic collaborative, repetitive feed-back wave of parallel momenta, constrained by two fractal points communicating in an stable, parallel relationship , origin of the steady growth of waves into networks: ∑ST≤≈ ≥∑TS.

**∆nalysis****: THE FORMAL STIENCE OF SCALES.**

Analysis is the study of the ∆-scales, and as such it has grown to be the most important field of mathematics, along topology, the study of St (space with temporal motions), which Ts, Algebra puts together, from the perspective of discrete numbers.

As it happens the three sub-disciplines of mathematics correspond closely to the time, space and scalar elements of the Universe.

And the similarity between GST and i-logic mathematics as the most experimental of all sciences is so great we shall only consider an entire new discipline, to ad to the three classic ones, Ælgebra (Existential Algebra, not to confuse with ¬Æ, non-aristotelian time and non-euclidean space), which studies from scratch the formalism of the 10 dimensional ∆ûst of space-time of which we are all made, with three time arrows, three ±1 ∆-scales and 3 Spatial-topologies.

Regarding ∆nalysis, we just need to add conceptual in-depth understanding of its laws, to further develop the classic disciplines of science that use it.

Now the fundamental concept behind analysis is the ∂∫ duality of ‘derivatives’ and ‘integrals’, related at first sights to the concepts of ‘time’ and ‘space’ (you derivate in time, you integrate in space), and to the concept of scalar ‘evolution’ from parts into wholes (you derivate to obtain a higher scalar wholeness.

i.e. you derivate a past space into present speed, adding a time-motion, and then derivate into acceleration – future time – to obtain the ‘most thorough single parameter of the being in time’: its acceleration that encodes also its speed and distance.

On the other hand you integrate in space, and so it is also customary to consider the first and second integral, which will bring also the ternary scale of volume of a system.

And it is a tribute to the simplicity of the Universe that further ‘derivatives’ are not really needed, *to perceive the system in its full time and space parameters. As further derivations and integrations are not needed (they happen in the search of curvature and tensions and jerks, rates of acceleration, which are really menial details and in some combined space-time multiple systems).*

The third derivative, or higher derivatives however are used to improve the accuracy of an approximation to the function.

f(xo+h)=f(xo)+f′(xo)h+f″(xo)h²/2!+f‴(ξ)h³/3!

Taylor’s expansion of a function around a point involves higher order derivatives, and the more derivatives you consider, the higher the accuracy. This also translates to higher order finite difference methods when considering numerical approximations.

And there is behind this fascinating discovery an entire duality *between the concept of limits and differentials (Newton’s vs. Leibniz’s approach) which has been hardly explored by classic mathematics in its experimental meaning.*

It is then essential to the workings of the Universe to fully grasp the relationship between scales and analysis. Both in the up direction of *derivatives and the down dimension of integrals; in its parallelism with polynomials, which rise dimensional scales of a system in a different ‘analytic, temporal way’ (so limits are to calculus what algebra is to geometry, in a t-s Duality).*

Further on its connections with the actions of the being, which *are extractions of motions and forms from other scales, derivatives and integrals are essential to the workings of the organism, and so we shall study also the connection of the a,e,i,o,u actions between scales (qualitative understanding) and its mathematical, analytic development (quantitative understanding).*

Finally, it is in this analysis on how systems derivate and desintegrate alternately the parts into wholes into parts, how we can get to understand the meaning of mathematical physics and the quantitative processes of entropic motions, which transform form into motion, ‘derivating’ it, and its opposite density integrals, which calculate volumes of vital space and energy; and similar processes.

In brief, to understand the processes involved in transformations, emergences and dissolutions, birth and death systems of Nature, specially in the simpler mathematical systems of physics, with its minimal complexity, ∆nalysis will reveal all its power to enlighten and explain physics, to the point that we could say physics is really ∆nalytical laws applied to the processes of physical systems.

In that sense, if we consider the scalar version of the Generator equation: ∆-1 (entropic field) > ∆º (present wave motion) > ∆+1 (informative density) we could consider that *trans-form-ations between the space-time states of a system involve its integral or derivative in scalar geometry.*

And so the study of the ‘formal mode’ of a differential equation for an event of physics will often give the schooled scientist an immediate ‘image’ of what kind of process is.

I.e. a process of death from form into entropy-field: ∆+1 (t) << ∆-1 (S), will be a ‘second differential equation’ ONLY which jumps and dissolves the tif parameter of the entity, mass or charge, down two scales into a field.

*Hence all fields created by a singularity are expressed with variations of the Poison equation:
∇²φ=ƒ*

On the other hand a process of distribution of the same ‘Stif’ parameter from a singularity source outwards, into a wave motion, will be a single jump of scale: a process of balanced distribution into an equilibrium, present state departing from the source that becomes a ‘wave’: ∆º<∆-1 (S).

So again *we find all over mathematical physics, those processes of a singularity becoming a wave, the first one discovered *the the heat equation, which is a single jump between states and scales, hence one which uses only a jump between parameters and a first differential (wave state) or between a first differential and a second one (wave state):

∂u/∂t = α∇²u

Which ultimately is a case of a diffusion equations, which will appear as the fundamental law of many systems (so Ohm’s laws is his ‘homolog’ NOT ‘analog’ in the electromagnetic scale):

Where ϕ(r, t) is the density of the diffusing material at location r and time t and D(ϕ, r) is the collective diffusion coefficient for density ϕ at location r; and ∇ represents the vector differential operator del.

So we observe here some other ‘themes’ of GST: first that we use as always ratios NOT absolute parameters to define any reality, in this case density not mass. Second that the process involves a Tiƒ ‘dense’ state vs. a ‘wave-state’ (D(Φ, r). And if the diffusion coefficient depends on the density (Cyclical tiƒ element, then the equation is nonlinear), otherwise if it depends of the wave state it is linear.

And so on and so on… Indeed, the ‘explanations’ of all the equations of mathematical physics must be done departing from those ‘fundamental set of events’ which themselves depend on the space-time actions allowed to any system. And for that reason a few differential equations defining those basic events of GST (diffusion, harmonics, waves, speeds, etc.) suffice to explain mathematical physics.

*In other terms, the whys and purposes of mathematical physical events in space-time are therefore encoded by the operandi of ∆nalysis.*

**¬ælgebra.**

Finally as we stated the third sub discipline of mathematics is temporal sequential numerical algebra, not based in sets, but in numbers, the temporal equivalent of points (from where ∆nalysis departed).

So in true form we should consider a simple duality: geometric spatial points vs numbers of sequential social time, as numbers unlike points are additive, social indistinguishable systems; hence perfect to define the social scales of the fifth dimension.

So we shall consider in this very introductory post the ‘closure and meaning’ of types of numbers and its scales.

In the graph, an ∆ scale can be represented through the interval of 0 to 1 by finitesimals or the interval from 1 to ∞, which become the decametric and decimal regions of a supœrganism represented in the real line: ∆-1: o to 1, 1, the ∆o scale and 1 to ∞, the external world.

**Social numbers and infinities: the temporal algebra of geometry. **

Mathematics divides phenomena into two broad classes, discrete or temporal and continuous, or spatial historically corresponding to the earlier division between T-arithmetic and S-geometry.

Discrete systems can be subdivided only so far, and they can be described in terms of whole numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, …. Continuous systems can be subdivided indefinitely, and their description requires the real numbers, numbers represented by decimal expansions such as 3.14159…, possibly going on forever. Understanding the true nature of such infinite decimals lies at the heart of analysis.

And yet lacking the proper ∆ST theory it is yet not understood.

The distinction between continuous mathematics and discrete mathematics IS ONE BETWEEN SINGLE, SYNCHRONOUS, CONTINUOUS SPACE WITH LESS INFORMATION, and the perception in terms of ‘time cycles, or fractal points; space-time entities’, which will show to be ALWAYS discrete in its detail, either because it will HAVE BOUNDARIES IN SPACE, or it will be A SERIES OF TIME CYCLES AND FREQUENCIES, perceived only when the time cycle is ‘completed’, and hence will show DISCONTINUITIES ON TIME.

Thus the dualities of ST on one side, and the ‘Galilean paradox’ of the mind’s limits of perception of information lay at the heart of the essential philosophical question: it is the Universe discrete or continuous in space and time. Both, but always discrete when in detail due to spatial boundaries, and the measure of time cycles in the points of repetition of its ‘frequency’.

So ultimately we face a mental issue of mathematical modeling: the ‘mind-art’ (as pure exact science does not exist, all is art of linguistic perception) of representing features of the natural world in a reduced mental, mathematical form.

The universe does not contain or consist of actual mathematical objects, but a language can model all aspects of the universe. So all resembles mathematical concepts.

For example, the number two does not exist as a physical object, but it does describe an important feature of such things as human twins and binary stars; and so we can extract by the ternary method, 3 sub-concepts of it:

2 means the first ∆-scale of growth of 1 being into 2, by:

S-imilarity and S-imultaneity in space (ab. Sim)’, ‘i-somorphism in time-information (ab. Iso)’ and ‘equality in ∆-scale’ (ab. Eq), as perceived by a linguistic observer, @, which will deem both beings ‘IDENTICAL’. Whereas identity means that an @-bserver will deem the being ∆st≈St, (Sim, Iso and Eq). So identity is the maximal perfection of a number, for a perceiver, even if ultimately:

*‘Not 2 beings are identical for the Universe, but can be identical for the observer’… an intuitive truth, *whose pedantic proof is of course of no importance (: we do not follow the axiomatic method of absolute minds here):, but it is at the heart of WHY REALITY IS NOT COLLAPSED INTO THE NOTHINGNESS OF A BIG-BANG POINT.

Thus those 3+0 elements of the ∆•ST coincide *a social number can be used whose intrinsic properties define conceptually ‘S- imultaneity, Ti-somorphism’ and ∆-equality or equivalence (ab. Eq) in size, which becomes an @identity for the mind. THEN A NUMBER IS BORN.*

I(n this ‘infinitorum’ of Universal thoughts, which bring always new depths as soon as we observe it with an ∆•st trained mind, there are differences between S-imilarity and Simultaneity to define in space an ‘identity’ and ‘equality’ and equivalence, treated elsewhere)

It IS THEN CLEAR that a number being a sum of points, encodes more information in a synoptic way about the T-informative nature of the ‘social group’ than an array of points, *which unlike a number tells us less about the ‘informative identity of the inner parts of the being’, but provides us more spatial knowledge about the relative position in space of the members of a number-group.*

And this is OBVIOUS, when we return to the origin of geometry and consider an age in which both concepts were intermingled so ‘points were numbers’ and displayed geometrical properties:

Numbers as points, showing also the internal geometric nature, used in earlier mathematics to extract the ‘time-algebraic’, ‘∆nalytical-social’ and S-patial-geometrical properties from them.

Of those numerical properties ∆nalysis is obviously more concerned with the ∆-questions; so a number is defined in ceteris paribus ∆nalysis as a *social scale* of @identical beings.

(The reader must abandon its single causal logic and accept always a ternary+0 model of knowledge, which do NOT forbid partial ceteris paribus single-causality as long AS WE KNOW its limits).

NEXT COMES the question on how to ‘consider scales’, which tend to be decametric, good! One of the few things that work right on the human mind and do no have to be adapted to the Universal mind, from d•st to ∆ûst.

Shall we study them downwards, through ‘finitesimal decimal scales’ or upwards, through decametric, growing ones?

Answer, an essential law of Absolute relativity goes as follows:

‘The study of decametric, §+ scales (10§≈10•^{10} ∆ ≈ ∆+1) is sy♥metric to the study of the inverse, decimal ∆>∆-1 scale’.

Or in its most reduced ‘formula’: ( **∞ = (1) = 0): (∞-1) ≈ (1-0)**

**Whereas **∞ is the perception of the whole ‘upwards’ in the domain of 1, the minimal quanta to the relative ∞ of the ∆+1 scale. While 1 is the relative infinite of a system observed downwards, such as ∆+1 (1) is composed of a number of ‘finitesimal parts’ whose minimal quanta is 0.

So in absolute relativity the ∆-1 world goes from 1 to 0, and the ∆+1 equivalent concept goes from 1 to ∞. And so now we can also extract of the ‘infinitorum thought receptacle’J a key difference between both mathematical techniques:

*A conceptual analysis upwards has a defined lower point-quanta, 1 and an undefined upper ∞ limit. While a downwards analysis has an upper defined whole limit, 1 and an undefined ‘finitesimal minimum, +0).*

So the smart reader will notice this absolute relative duality of ∆±1 where ∆@ is the ‘observer’, implies relativity of knowledge, always with a self-centered element to define it, and ‘the relative definition of finite infinities, or ∆+1 limit (ab. ∞) and finite infinitesimals (+0).

This brings an essential isomorphism of absolute relativity (do NOT confuse ∆-equality, with S-yncrhonicity, Ti-somorphism and @dentity; we ‘repeat’ as I know when, if any human ever gets to read those texts, there is TOO much upgrading and not to get dizzy, we DO repeat essential truths).

I-somorphism is the concept of equality in time-information and at the heart of the POSSIBILITIES to do mathematical PROOFS in different, seemingly non-identical space-time domains.

When we apply the identity of ∞|^{0 }(here written in inverse fashion) as in the title of this post on ‘number theory’, poised to complete what my fellow countryman, Fermat, started, we *understand the why of numbers and its techniques, so far only made explicit as most science is on how-terms:*

The real numbers NOW include always an inverse infinity between each 1+1 interval. YET they can provide satisfactory models for a variety of phenomena, even though no physical quantity can be measured accurately to more than a dozen or so decimal places; as 0 now is the undetermined lower limit.

It is *not* the values of infinitely many decimal places that apply to the real world but the *deductive* structures that they embody and enable due to the equivalence of 0≈1≈∞. In the graph a sample of this: the rational points of a 0-1 sphere are connected to *all the pythagorean triples: a²+b²=c², which are the key numbers of the 1-∞ game, projections of the o-1 world into bidimensional spe<st>Tiƒ larger game of the most efficient/perfect mind/mirror language of the whole.*

Analysis and its inverse integral and derivative calculus ‘drinks’ on all this.

Thus it came into being because many aspects of the natural world can profitably be modeled by those equivalences, as being continuous—at least, to an excellent degree of approximation. Again, this is a question of modeling, not of reality. Matter is not truly continuous; if matter is subdivided into sufficiently small pieces, then indivisible components, or atoms, will appear and finally we *will find the finitesimal +0 quanta*.

But atoms are extremely small, and, for most applications, treating matter as though it were a continuum introduces negligible error while greatly simplifying the computations; *when we work on the 1-∞ upper ∆+1 scale, that of the cosmological realm; whereas the intermediate scale is that of ∆o human thermodynamics. So we can then state in physical systems the equivalence of:*

*+0 (quantum physics) ≈ |-thermodynamics ≈ ∞ (bound infinity): Gravitational scale *.

And all what is above quantum effects, in ‘classic physics’, can be studied in a continuum modeling, which is standard engineering practice when studying the flow of fluids such as air or water, the bending of elastic materials, the distribution or flow of electric current, and the flow of heat, and so on (all ∆>∆+1 physical systems).

#### Number systems

As usual it is NOT casual that humans do have different numbers, as they are related to the different ∆•ST 4 elements of reality. In that regard, *the proper way to name them in GST is that offered by Gauss: direct=natural, positive; inverse=negative; integer numbers and LATERAL imaginary ones.*

*Of those 3 concepts, positive and modern ‘complex’ denominations work fine, but we will call negative numbers ‘- inverse numbers’ because it is far more sound conceptually, as inverse numbers are the inverse direction of a timespace dimension, often the Spe<≈>Tiƒ dual element.*

Those variety of number systems can be operated on by some or all of the standard operations of arithmetic: addition, multiplication, subtraction, and division (we study them in ¬ælgebra). Such systems have a variety of technical names (e.g., group, ring, field) that are not employed here.

These main number systems are, related to ∆•st as follows:

**§: ∑S, ∑T.**The natural, ‘direct’ numbers ℕ. These numbers are the positive (and zero) whole numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …. If two such numbers are added or multiplied, the result is again a natural number; WHICH means*it is possible to create all intermediate societies departing from a unit quanta, between the relative 1 and*Its use is for the most simple intuitive~~∞~~value within which the domain of the function or event is meaningful.*games of social evolution of identical groups, through the § scale between ∆ and ∆+1*

**S+(-T).**The integers ℤ, which add the “Inverse’ Spe<≈>Tiƒ numbers, which will be normally related to the inverse, entropy vs. information functions of all systems of reality, hence to the inverse ‘directions’ of one of the ‘dimensions’ of space-time (S, T or ∆). As Gauss intuitively understood this removes absurd hang-ups of scientists, afraid of negative ‘values’, specially in physics, where c-speed is a limit because they don’t understand ‘inverse mass – expansive entropic dark energy’ in relativity equations. These numbers are normally called the positive and negative whole numbers …, −5, −4, −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, …. If two such numbers are added, subtracted, or multiplied, the result is again an integer; which again means it is possible to ad up all intermediate combinations of entropy and information, or similar inverse directions in a dimension of ∆•st, departing from a unit quanta, between the relative 1 and ∞ value within which the domain of the function or event is meaningful; and so it is its Spe<≈>Tiƒ function.

**Sx(t=1/ƒ)=K (5D Metric)**. The rational numbers ℚ. These numbers are the +direct and -inverse fractions*p*/*q*where*p*and*q*are integers and*q*≠ 0. They are required for all equations based in the metric inverted properties of space and time, whose product in terms of time duration or division in terms of cyclical frequency of information remains constant (it is still a rational number). Indeed, if two such numbers are added, subtracted, multiplied, or divided (except by 0, which has by definition no inverse, as it is undefined in those ‘full scales’; and so must be truly understood as the first mathematicians who ignored its existence the ‘outside limit below the unit quanta’), the result is again a rational number.

**∆-1.**The real numbers ℝ. As explained above, these numbers are the positive and negative relative ifinitesimals in decimal scales which study the ∆<∆-1 world of downwards scales till the relative infinite ∆-1 quanta, normally according to the standard scaling on the 10¹¹ level. So normally*a decimal number and Universal numerical constant ‘breaks’ (becomes disordered an meaningless, before reaching the 11th decimal, the limit of calculations in GST. And according to the ‘wholeness of the Universe’ within each of those fractal island-universes,*if two such numbers are added, subtracted, multiplied, or divided (except by 0), the result is again a real number.

Now, there are 2 other ‘spaces’ besides the 3 topological spaces (Sp-cylindrical, ST-cartesian, tiƒ-polar) worth to notice, to explain all the fractal space-time complex world:

**Complex space** ideal for studying ∏imespace world cycles as the previous ones. Since in a complex space, the ‘negative’ arrow inverse to the positive one (Spe<=>tiƒ) *are kept separated as* lateral i-numbers, by the convention – initially a fortuitous error of interpretations – than the minus of √-1 *cannot be taken out of the √. It can, but as this was not understood mathematicians maintained the Tiƒ arrow represented by a negative root as a different coordinates. And the result of* its combinations with real numbers, gave origin of complex numbers ℂ, which *are the best complex numbers to represent the 2 inverse arrows of world cycles of **existence.*

Thanks to the ‘serendipitous’ error of earlier mathematicians, which could not conceive negative≈inverse motions, the real line was broken into perpendicular co-ordinates, which are perfect to represent world cycles an scales of the fifth dimension with Riemann like-surfaces in which points communicate with upper scales though flows up and down the imaginary coordinates of the fifth dimension, since the real line represents Spe (max. size, X-oordiantes) and the imaginary root axis represents the growth of information which has min. size, and it is negative, in as much ask its development rests ‘entropy’ to the real numbers.

**Temporal algebra. Numbers as sequential time points.**

We can now elaborate a bit more on the second fundamental subdiscipline of maths, algebra (from where ∆nalysis departed). But in true form we should consider a simple duality: geometric spatial points vs numbers of sequential social time, as *numbers unlike points are additive, social indistinguishable systems; hence perfect to define the social scales of the fifth dimension.*

And among them the best to show the holographic principle of bidimensionality the inverse properties of i-nformation and entropy and many other complex elements of gst ARE complex numbers:

In the graphs ‘lateral number axis’ or ‘imaginary axis’ tend to represent ∆temporal/informative functions; while the real parts represent the Sp-entropic elements.

And the whole sum of both the space-time function.

So Complex numbers and its functions, notably Riemann surfaces are ideal to represent world cycles and scales of the fifth dimension:

In the scalar, functional description each complex point is a ‘function’ in itself, with ‘inner parts’ ∆±1 world cycles and its different ‘motions’ in time. It is then interesting to notice that the path between 2 such points as worldycles can be many, but providing its duration is not infinite (Gauss theorem), *the integral of the world cycle is the same.*

The i scale is *a polynomial order smaller than the real Spe-scale that has negative subtracting value.*

*So it mimics the ‘resting value’ of the particle/head, Tiƒ, that the real space (body-wave plane) sustains.*

* I.e, if we consider S to represent the total ‘energy value’ of an ST present plane of existence, ∆i will ‘subtract’ an √ST quantity of that energy, ‘shrinking’ its space to ‘rise’ a new dimension of form, the particle head that ‘floats’ above the body-wave. *

This of course, scientists still don’t know and it is a wonder of the ‘automaton’ Universe that they DO use C-numbers to study world cycles, *without knowing what they are and what they study, LOL.*

In that sense, we will use the lateral concept of Gauss for the imaginary units. These numbers are of the form *x* + *iy* where *x* and *y* are real numbers and *i* = √(−1) .

**Functional spaces,** which are** **the ideal representation of two scales of the fifth dimension where each point is a world in itself, of which the best known are the Hilbert>Banach spaces used to model Spe-Fields (the simplest functionals) and hence the lower scales of lineal entropy of quantum physics (where each point is a lineal operator).Thus Hilbert spaces fully studies ∆ST, as they can model the whole 5th dimension elements, expanding points into vectors (field spaces), functionals (scalar spaces) and any other ‘content for each ∆fractal Universe, you want to represent. Hence they are essential to study both spatial quantum physics and fourier temporal series.

And call *function spaces ∆-Spaces.*

**∆ST. **FINALLY the most complex modelling is done with function spaces in the complex plane, as *we can represent both motions in worldcycles and across planes of the 5th dimension.*

Such space-time representations are ‘complete’ (as the functional is infinite in its parts, so are the real numbers, which in fact are so numerous that the rational ones are in real space a relative zero, showing the infinite scales of the mathematical Universe) and show properties of world cycles, allowing the ‘generation’ of smaller and larger scales (as in a Mandelbrot set).

The 3 graphs show the 3 main symmetries of the Universe, lineal spatial forces, cyclical time frequencies and the ‘wormholes’ between the ∆ and ∆-1 scales of the 5th dimension (ab. ∆), which structure the Universe, the first of them better described with ‘vector-points’ of a field of Hilbert space and the other 2 symmetries of time cycles/frequencies and scales with more general function spaces.

In that sense, Hilbert spaces, are a particular case of function spaces, the ideal structure to express those fractal scales of the inner 5th dimension, as they can only be vectors with a dot product, but the inner parts of the being might be many other things besides an ‘entropic, moving vectorial force/field’ as quantum fields are. Hilbert spaces, by definition are ‘complete’ because as a real number do ‘penetrate’ in its inner scalar regions, made of its finitesimal elements.

Their use shows the scalar structure of ∆nalysis, where points are fractal non-euclidean with a volume, which grows when we come closer to them (so point stars become worlds and point cells living being, through which ∞ lines can cross in time (paths of the point that becomes a vector) or space (inner volume of information of the point, described by a function).

Since more interesting is the much larger concept of a function space, which can represent any ∆±1 dual system of scales of the fifth dimension both in time when those points are considered future paths, so they can model ‘parallel universes’ (i.e. the potential paths of the point ) or in space (when the function represents a complete volume of inner parts, which are paradoxically larger in number than the whole – the set of sets is larger than the set -> see Cantor Paradox).

So function spaces can model any relationship between an ∆ and ∆±1 scale of reality and have wide use in all sciences and disciplines.

To notice that any function space has NOT ∞ dimensions, as physicists state. Physicists without clear definitions tend to call ‘dimension’ anything that moves (:. So they give to any parameter such a name. It is ONLY an inner dimension, in which each point expands into a function, what we talk about.

i=√-1, is the root of an inverse number, and represents the information of a bidimensional system.

Where we must consider a ‘co-ordinate system of ‘square, bidimensional’ space and time elements, where the x² coordinates responds to space, and the i²=-1, represents the inverse mostly time scales.

**Recap**. *Number systems respond to the processes found in the ∆•st **universe, with an @-point of view or frame of reference. The most impotent are: *

*the N-atural ‘direct numbers, for simple social groups, its inverse negative numbers for Spe<≈≥Tiƒ symmetries.*

*The Cartesian graph and the rational numbers, for Spe x Tiƒ = K metric equations and complementary systems, (whereas often the z-dimension is the reproductive combination of the other 2). *

*The real numbers, for inverse ∆±1 scales & the complex numbers for world cycles; and functional spaces, for** ‘whole ∆, ∆±1’ space-time events.*

#### Functions and operandi.

In simple terms, a function *f* is a mathematical rule that assigns to a number *x* (in some number system and possibly with certain limitations on its value) another number *f*(*x*). For example, the function “square” assigns to each number *x* its square *x*^{2}.

The common functions that arise in analysis are thus definable by formulas, *which are related to the ∆s and ∆T duality of functions,* such as:

∆§: Polynomials of the type, *f*(*x*) = *x*^{2}. The logarithmic function log (*x*); & the exponential function exp (*x*) or *e ^{x}* (where

*e*= 2.71828…; and the square root function √

*x*.

∆T: Trigonometric functions, sin (*x*), cos (*x*), tan (*x*), and so on. they matter in as much as they are symmetric, along the x and y axes of a supposed circular worldcyle broken in 2.

**∆nalysis. Derivatives can be **of world cycles of time, and then can only be in one direction or populations of space, and when a system decreases, the space is dying when it grows it does so slower, so we find also different speeds on the two time arrows of space through the 5th dimension.

Space is multiple time is single Time is shorter in form, space is more extended solid. Of time we see only an instant on space we integrate that instants as a time of sum of frequencies which all play the same world cycle, becoming populations of a spatial picture of its reproductive world. Space thus is the mirror reproductive symmetry of the frequency in time, its tail of memories, by reproduction and expansion, radiation along the path of the singularity time line of the wave.

Thus the integration and derivative of those different time forms becomes the most magic of all mathematical operandi, truly the one of the 5th dimension.

Universal constants are normally bidimensional closed curves, which expand outerly as entropy and implode inwardly in time, information, the logic faster cycles of the inner bore and the outer membrane invaginate, between both, so in tho manner a space-time fractal point with an inner region grows, from point to morula to gastrula.

**∆±i astrophysical stiences.**** **

**CORRESPONDENCE WITH MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS**

**UPGRADING**** MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS TO FRACTAL, CYCLICAL SPACE-TIME.**

“Mathematics is an experimental science, and definitions do not come first, but later on.”

*Heaviside*, the forgotten genius of mathematical physics, author of the 4 Heaviside equations of electromagnetism (wrongly called Maxwell equations who just did a mess of 20 ones with ugly quaternions 🙂 and the Gravito-magnetic equations, which fusion gravitation and magnetism, foreseeing the Fractal Unification equation of charges and masses of this blog.

Heaviside, as Lobachevski before him and Einstein after him, were indeed right when they considered that the language of physics – mathematics – is the best experimental mind-mirror to describe most physical systems, *as the mind singularities of those systems use* mathematical frames of reference in space to act-react in time with other space-time beings of the Universe.

It is then surprising that idealist physicists since Hilbert astounding ego-trip (‘I imagine lines, points and planes’ ) have rejected the ‘experimental, a posteriori nature’ of the mathematical language, they share with all those other œ-singularities for the concept that mathematics is the a priori nature of reality (Copenhagen interpretation). As the ultimate mathematical properties are indeed a proof of the organic, social, fractal nature of the physical Universe. So before we introduce the tenants of mathematical physics, we shall see the larger view of…

**THE FOUNDATION OF MATHEMATICS AS AN EXPERIMENTAL SCIENCE.**

“The less intelligent a person is, the less mysteries he founds in the Universe’ *Schopenhauer*.

**¬Ælgebra: existential, time algebra.**

In GST, THERE are three arrows of relative, time, all finite in their application. So local time travel is possible, as it merely means a transformation of space-time from the relative arrow of future information and life to the arrow of local entropy, past and death of the system and this fact completely changes the ‘logic’ of all sciences, as the ‘reversibility’ of time arrows, has only be applied in quantum physics, and with little understanding of its true nature (within the simplified concept of a single global time arrow, which is always ternary and local, lasting the finite time cycle). Cyclical time again is also ignored. And so existential time algebra is the biggest advance in time thought since Aristotle defined its single-arrow logic and physicists used it in their lineal time concept and theories of the Universe. Hence the non-aristotelian name given to existential algebra.

So time has also three dimensions parallel to the three topologies of reality:, relative past lineal entropic limbs/fields; relative present, iterative hyperbolic body-waves and relative future, in-form-ative particles-heads, which put together create in *simultaneous space – a super organism (ab.œ)* , which will go through three relative ages an entropic youth of maximal entropy/motion; a steady-state maturity of reproductive nature and balance between e and i and a third age of warping, wrinkle and excess of information, after which the relative arrows of time change direction and entropy follows information, erasing the system into its big-bang death, which closes the ‘world cycle’ of space-time or ‘life-death cycle’, whose main parameter of measure is the ‘total energy of the system’, which becomes a zero sum through the entire world cycle of the being.

This simple definition of reality and all its physical, and biological systems (which can be extended easily to socio-biological systems and its three classes of informative people in control of the financial/legal languages of the society, comprised of re=productive middle classes, complementary to the informative/neuronal classes, which together rule over a ‘flat’ geographic nation from where they extract their raw materials); stresses the informative arrow of time, which lasts longer as the life phase of the world cycle is the ‘period’ of the three ages of growing information, of the system, while the pure entropic explosion of death which extends the system back into space, lasts far less, a minimum clock-quanta-cycle of time.

The Universe is a game of creation of ‘in-form-ative’ forms with entropic ‘motions’. Humans use the concepts of space and time to describe the game, albeit with a very primitive understanding of them (never mind their ego is so huge, whatever they think whenever they think seems to them an absolute truth, a new discovery, a genius insight). We shall try to upgrade the mind of humans in this blog, starting with the understanding of the complex logic of the three arrows of time, as humans use one aristotelian one-dimensional logic, and the fractal structure of the points of space, as humans still use the concept of an euclidean point without volume of information.

Thus the logic of cyclical time (ab. πime) and fractal, œrganic scalar space (ab. §paœ) is of a higher order than that of present man, which is stuck in the 2500 years old r=evolution of the mind of the axial age, and needs a new refurbishing.

So we shall in this blog on ‘stiences’ (sciences of space-time beings) define entirely the Universe and all its ‘fractal beings of spacetime’ in an inverse fashion to present science which has stressed the arrow of motion and entropy as the single dimension of time and hence only path of future in an expansive, dying universe, which is only one third of the picture (Physics’ philosophy of the Universe).

This fundamental simplifying error on the workings and foundations of nature, hardly understood in science, isdue to the deformation and simplification of time studies by the use of a single mechanical clock and a single arrow of ‘future-time’, entropy, in the original analysis of modern sciences, when Galileo, an artillery master to the service of the Venetian arsenal was charged with the job of maximising the lineal-entropic motion of cannonballs and invented the concept of lineal time, which became canonical in all sciences.

As physics became the ‘mother of all sciences’, the error continued. If anything it was entrenched by the growing power of physicists, as the makers of the weapons that gave power to the western civilisation of ‘lineal religions’ (Abrahamic cults with a clear human exceptionalist destiny of progress through the machine). So since weapons are entropic systems of metal that deliver lineal entropy to destroy human life, and heat to disorder our internal clocks, heat studies of entropic gases and weapons gave birth to theories of entropy-only Universe.

they missed the key element, tiƒ… And how the three parts create all physical systems, with a charge-mass, singularity a magnetic/angular momentum membrane; and a vital space between them:

In the graph almost all physical systems can be described with the external circulatory closed membrane which encircles a vital space, self-centred in a Tƒi singularity of information or mind-point-particle of the system.

To start the mathematical description of a physical system we thus have to depart as any other system from a ternary membrane, vital space, Tƒi, center of future information system, which in mathematical physics can be easily described mathematically departing from the GST equation, in its simplest form with a poisson equation that describes parameter for the Tƒi center and one for the Spe membrane.

Now there are many terms I have been using for the singularity mind mirror that stops the Tiƒ motions of informative time into a still moment of Informative Space, the mind, pov, point of view, has a connection with both its mathematical meaning (the central point of view of a frame of reference), and its sensorial one – the center of communication of the system, which decides when to stop and go, state in spe or stif, or tif states, moving modularly through the three integral parts of the being.

It is indeed important to understand the mind-singularity of Tiƒ, STiƒ, the singularity of temporal information, where all becomes still, a 0 which therefore *must immediately to balance the sudden loss of momentum at the zero-point, explode into an entropic relative ∞ speed.*

So dynamically o x ∞ *means an stop and go, 0 and ∞ speed as in the singularity of a black hole, then ejecting through its kerr poles faster than light. Such is the way physical barriers are ‘quantum jumped’ a 0 state followed by an ∞ one.*

In the graph, topological ∏ime§paœ beings are ternary systems, described as closed balls with three parts, a singularity ‘y’, a vital space, the r-disk, and a closed clock-like (sequential view) cyclical membrane (simultaneous spatial view). The singularity or tƒi rules the system with its mind-will of survival; the membrane controls its input and output and herds the vital space, the open ball. Variations of this scheme and different mind views of it do not vary its fundamental ternary structure, already understood by Aristotle, Leibniz and Descartes – philosophers of science – but not by ‘pragmatical physicists’ of measure and mechanical praxis.

(The reader should excuse the ambivalence of the language of scientists, which is carried often in this blog to avoid constant explanations; as entropy and energy are constantly confused so are form and information… entropy is pure motion with no form, form is pure information with no motion, energy is entropy with little form: Max. e x min. ƒ, and information is form-in-action, form in motion, Max. ƒ x Min. e; so in equations such as e=mc², actually e is entropy not energy as it destroys the mass-form – a vortex of information into an explosion that erases it. In the topological description all seems more clear: in the center the singularity creates the mind’s pure still form, mirror of the Universe, transforming temporal informative cycles into a ‘stif’ still spatial synchronous intelligent mind; in the border, the membrane has the maximal cyclical motion; and in the middle both mix into energy and information.)

To start the mathematical description of a physical system we thus have to depart as any other system from a ternary membrane, vital space, Tƒi, center of future information system, which in mathematical physics can be easily described mathematically departing from the GST equation, in its simplest form with a poisson equation that describes parameter for the Tƒi center and one for the Spe membrane.

Indeed, in physics the *singularities/minds/vortices of information, masses and charges are the essential element of reality, which commands the physical system through its force, which processes information for the ‘being’, and reflects back as order to the field-domain.*

In the graph, 3 representations, the classic one as a sink is NOT real, the second one is a real picture – a charges as a vortex of time, the 3rd one, is a fractal picture of a hurricane. So mass is a vortex-clock of information, evident in a simple fusion of two equations; E=hƒ + E=mc2 M=ƒ(K).

So mass is a vortex of time of the larger cosmological scale and a charge of a lower scale. But since smaller clocks run faster, as faster vortices attract more, *charges are paradoxically stronger forces of attraction that cosmic gravitational scales.*

An immediate consequence of this fact – that charges and masses are time vortices – is the equation of unification of both, using the simple metric of 5D, as if we accelerate the time speed of a mass vortex, while at the same time shrinking its space according to those metric Sp x Tiƒ = K, *both the galaxy vortex of a black hole and the quark vortex of an atom becomes the same, and charge becomes mass, unifying both – the saint grail seek by physicists, which is a trivial result in GST maths.*

**A mathematical Universe must be perceptive and social.**

In the graph, a fundamental truth of the Universe is the existence of singularities that order physical, biological an social systems, except when they are in a free, chaotic state of maximal entropy (gaseous state or dark entropy between galaxies), which cannot produce order, as they lack any ‘frame of reference’.

Mental singularities, Monads, or Maxwellian Demons are the ‘missing variable’ needed to explain the whys of reality. In mathematics we call them P.o.vs. Frames of reference, self-centred in a point, which we use as *physical systems do, *functions of space-time. In that sense physical, atomic systems do indeed calculate as quantum-bit computers might do. Are they ‘conscious’? Likely, as consciousness is just a self-reflection between two mirrors. In the human case, the I=eye that sees space and the verbal cogito ergo sum temporal mind – the conscious languages. *But it is not the verbal consciousness of man, but a mathematical consciousness which among humans only a very intense ‘mathematical physicists’, which can ‘see’ as musicians see ‘scales’ that provoke emotions, equations as dynamic visual forms. *What would then be this kind of consciousness? Likely a sense of proportion, symmetry, balance and beauty. It does NOT matter in any case the ultimate inner sensations of physical matter, but the outer description of the actions of those singularities, which do order and reflect a mathematical organization around them, when in its solid crystal state they act with the program of existence, reproducing the information of that minimalist mind image. Indeed, a crystal grows with a symmetry which its inner image reflects back in the growth of ‘crystal cells’. And that is called reproduction, the objective definition of life, of a whole being in the fractal Universe.

And so, *P.o.vs. are canonical to mathematical science, or else mathematics, which is today based in analytic geometry and the study of ‘self-centred’ functions, would NOT work. *

A philosophy of mathematical properties of space-time, upgrading the essential properties of ‘points in space and sequential numbers in time’ is thus an a priori exercise, which I recommend to all physicists, so they can leave behind their abstract, ‘selfie view’ of a mechanical, chaotic Universe, where only ‘they think in mathematics’.

Singularities that reproduce information once they are formed, organised fractal super organisms also occur in astrophysics, from crystals to black holes and only anthropomorphism denies it. The GST view though is different: as we a*re all space-time beings, the properties of human space-time beings must be share in quality (not in quantity and complexity the variable of gst) by all other species of the Universe. So mindless ‘markovian’ entropy without time causality do exist but it is NOT by any means the dominant ∑∑actions->∑arrow->age of time.*

Thus the concept of physicists of a single ðime arrow is only valid for entropic gaseous states, and their idea that such states must be ‘extended’ to all realities, the most absurd hyperbolic statement of science ever, due to the deformation of its worldly profession as makers of motion machines and entropic weapons.

That 150 years after entropy became a dogma for the future in military Germany, XXI c. *scientists still revere the concept of an entropic dying Universe tells much more about the fundamental ‘believer≈memorial=reproductive arrow’ of human minds, in accordance with the present-reproductive Nature of reality, which is ‘conservative’ than about the ternary structure of the real Universe. In the graph, without Singularities of order, neither mathematics, not solid physics, or biology would make any sense. Only gas in which indeed there is not Maxwellian demons, except when the outside membrane is designed to reorder through a distorted potential field, the molecules of the gaseous system.*

In the graphs, the translation of the fifth dimension to life systems and true non-entropic pyramids of human actions, which always have had as artists and ethic writers have better understood an upper ontological level of highest satisfaction in the social communion with the rest of mankind or with the Universe, (origin of the concepts of God in western anthropomorphic religions – read God=human super organism – and eastern Taoist-Buddhist- Hinduist ones= God as universal super organism).

And such systems do have always a ‘self-centered Tiƒ singularity or point of order, which is the Maxwellian demon lost in pure gaseous states, fields and limbs of entropy. It is only because physicists deny the ordering capacity of singularities, also in physics – accelerated vortices of mass, charge in the quantum scale; black holes in the galactic scale; crystals in the thermodynamic scale – that an entropy only Universe can make sense. But this is called reductionism in physics, censorship in social sciences – but at least accepted in biology or else we would have also to admit the brainless nature of mankind (well that might be the case, but only mankind, you know ‘two things a consider ∞, the stupidity of man and the Universe, my beloved predecessor in this business of dimensional upgrading, Mr. Einstein 🙂

In that regard, both Leibniz and Descartes, the founders of philosophy of science, both understood as we shall see in detail on those pages, the need for a ‘mental universe’ if mathematics was really the language that better reflected the Universe. Indeed, since mathematics has three disciplines, geometry, which is based in frames of references that act as mind-monads, mirroring reality and Algebra based, in social numbers which are indistinguishable groups of similar individuals that come together as a whole ‘3’, ’10’ and finally ∆nalysis which studies the ‘social scales’ of the Universe, as parts become wholes, each scale studied by a science, from societies of particles and forces called atoms, to societies of atoms called molecules, evolved into state of matter and life beings, evolved into super organisms and planetary ecosystems, gathered around stars, socially evolved into galaxies; the very existence of mathematics precludes the existence of a ‘social, scalar, organic, sentient Universe’.

So finite vital §paces gathered around a frame of reference; the three ðime arrows of entropy, information and its energy combinations, and social organic scales that evolve parts into wholes, are the ultimate properties of all fractal beings of reality made to the image and likeness of the whole. The previous graphs of the fifth dimension, and its ‘physical, biological and socio-economical supœrganisms thus show those scales, each one studied by a science, where in each scale, a self-centered mind, pov, will co-exist as a whole with its relative lower ∆-1 cellular/atomic, and relative upper ∆+1 social world/gravitational, universal scale.

Thus while we could do as current science does an external analysis of the fractal, informative Universe in pure abstract terms, to understand the whys of order, the will of survival of species and the constancy of forms that self-reproduce as all fractals do through its generator, ∆ºst particular equations, to explain why ‘mathematical ðime§pace beings’ do follow mathematical laws, embedded in those frames of reference, we need at the centre of each being, a mind-mirror that perceives automatically, processes and reflects in ‘inverse order’, the Universe; which is exactly what mathematical systems do, as they are always self-centered in a frame of reference or pºv; and always study social numbers, whose fundamental operandi are scalar polynomials and its scalar ∫∂ calculus.

In the graph, the same ternary structure happens in biological systems (and through the class structure in social ones, escaped for most of the blog, to simplify and due to the fact we have another blog dedicated to them).

Once the organic, vital, sentient properties of systems that obey mathematical laws have been proved, we can then consider the main error of mathematical physics – to reject those properties because of its limited understanding of mathematics and its units, ‘fractal points’ of space-time, which are ‘points with volume’ through which ∞ parallels can hold and so ‘encoding’ a world in its self (Leibniz).

Singularities and how they define scales of inner and outer worlds, and how they *become bridges between those scales of the fifth dimension – as in charges and masses, ‘doors’ to those scales, are then the main ‘missing’ variables of mathematical physics, which a continuous vision of space-time will never solve, or will do so in weird ways (wormholes, time travels through evaporating black holes and similar attempts to encode the fractal doors between level of 5D within the metric of a single 4D space-time continuum). Finally the lack of three time arrows and cyclical comprehension of time, ads injury to those interpretations. So missing, ∆, º and s<st>t symmetries it is a marvel that physics still works (:*

**The evolution of maths improves the mirror, its ternary syntax.**

It does of course because any mirror-image of reality even if unfocused carries some information about it, and works for the distorted mind view, which *let us remember is NOT REALITY BUT ALWAYS A LINGUISTIC MAPPING: Œ-Mind <linguistic perception> ∞ Universe, and so any mirror does carry a minimal information to be useful to departure a whole:*

In the graph, linguistic mirrors create minds with different amounts of information, useful to guide reality. We must not though confuse the mirror with reality, the a priori element.

All this said is easy to understand mathematics, its elements and disciplines as a mirror of the Universe.

For the scientist who will consider all this nonsense because he thinks he knows his maths and all is there, the answer is yes, *all is in the mirror but with less detail. So maths* as the universe does, has also 3∆st+º sub disciplines, it has also a fractal ‘derivative’ structure and it is also about space-time.

THOSE 3 main sub-disciplines code the 3 ‘structural elements’ of the Universe:

- ∆nalysis of the 5th dimension, its wholes and ‘finitesimals’ (1/n).
- Geometrical space, (Spe) and its unit, fractal points.
- Temporal algebra (tiƒ) and its units, sequential numbers.

And it has its ST ‘combinations of which the most important its topology (the study of form with motion).

Moreover the mirror of mathematics *has* evolved to explain in more detail the ‘actions of space-time’ of beings; *as all languages do improving its ternary grammar. So* words developed first ‘names only’ (forms), then motions ( active verbs) and finally ‘complements’ (complex systems).

And colour languages moved from dual B&W, to three colors (red-entropy, blue, form, green energy) to four, adding green/yellow mixes.

So today maths has evolved into multiple space-time disciplines. For example spatial geometry added, analytic algebra, which is geometry with sequential time numbers that finally dominated the discipline, while topology which is geometry of space with motion in time, today added ∆-scales (as it is defined with networks of ∆-1 points).

**Dogma and flexibility – evolution of languages.**

All this is said to remark a key concept that escapes mathematical physicists:

*No language-mirror is absolute in its truth, but an evolving system, which goes through three ages*

*So when written words appeared **pharaohs just said ‘it has written=truth’. Today in the far younger mathematical discipline, scientists say ‘it is an equation=it is a truth’.*

Only latter words were known to be also fictions, a fact that also happens with *equations but few scientists do **recognise. So maths has still a ‘religious, dogmatic outlook’ proper of all languages, even if it has already gone into a ‘third baroque, inflationary informative age of excessive formal content’ and split into multiple similar ‘metaphors’ (languages being inflationary as mirrors-minds are multiple, watching a single perspective do offer multiple views of a single event, hence the multiple equations observed to describe the same physical event).*

But religious people, aka dogmatic physicists do NOT understand all this about their mirror-language of mathematics.

For many of them, equations ‘are’ always truth, just when written, and other languages are NOT truth – dogmas we only find in fundamentalist verbal thought (God speaks only in Arab, so Koran cannot be translated as it looses its truth).

Of course, languages do have also ‘quantitative’ measure. So while all carry an image, some are better and we prefer a carrot picture than a drawing.

So, we concede maths *after images, is the best mind-mirror known to man, as it* carries more informative detail than words (but less than images), and so it has become after images (most humans believe in TV celebrities more than in physicists 🙂 the dominant language today, and overcome religious words. Still as Einstein put it ‘I know when maths is truth but not real’, meaning we need experimental analysis of mathematical truths and so NOT just because we can write an imaginary particle with maths, the particle will exist (Susy, evaporating holes etc). IT IS AN EGO ERROR, TO THINK then that maths is always truth and an even bigger ego-error to think maths is not experimental but produced by the human mind, which becomes a short of ‘God’ that talks maths as only God does (that was the idea of Kepler: god has taken 5000 – biblical – years to found an intelligent like his, me).

From a book of Penrose we bring that ‘error’ and correct it:

*In the graph, physicists are after all human egos submitted to the mind paradox, so they think ‘mathematics are a mind language, imagined by the physicist and ‘God’ a priori, creating a posteriori the Universe (copenhagen interpretation). The opposite is truth. *

The language of mathematics DOES NOT CREATE REALITY a priori, but ONLY a posteriori ‘sees it’, as a synoptic mirror, which as all other languages, a certain singularity uses to ‘see’ and develop its ‘survival actions’ in time-space.

But again as there are B&W, 3, 4 and 5 color animals (birds), with better detail maths can be improved to ‘see better’.

In its present ‘underdeveloped’ euclidean form, and with some fictional forms of mathematical physics taken for real, its incomplete structure must be improved.

This I did when young, after understanding the scalar metric of 5D Analysis and its 3 arrows of space-time, upgrading Non-E GEOMETRY.

In the previous graph to illustrate this real a posteriori nature of maths, we include besides Penrose’s another set of arrows – the stronger thicker one of the philosopher of science in the right.

So as usual in the multidimensional universe we can put together both directions of the process of creation.

Since *minds are mirrors, which once they have distorted and resumed reality into the still mind, try to order by reflection and proyection of that mind the Universe to make it look like the inner mind image, influencing in this way reality.*

**The Euclidean Mind of light-space. Kant.**

Newton indeed believe mainly in 2 things: Yahweh and absolute lineal time and space, a background abstract reference set up by God, who talked to him with comets.

So he studied the Cartesian graph, when reading ‘La geometrie’ which he acknowledged was the beginning of his interest for science.

But for him the graph and its lineal coordinates were not merely the human mind-world, but the graph that represented ALL of reality, which he blew to cosmic proportions and affirmed to be the graph of the absolute Universe and its space-time. This is NOT truth, and we will bring here a simple proof, derived from Kant’s realization that we ‘see light space-time’, because the ‘human mind is Euclidean’, which latter influenced the perception of painters, creating impressionist, as they realized also that we do NOT paint reality but light, THE RELATIVE SPACE-TIME our electronic eyes measure:

A light quantum has the 3 perpendicular dimensions of the informative electric field, the magnetic entropic field and the lineal c-speed that reproduces the wave. And those are the 3 exact perpendicular dimensions of our perceived space, as our eyes are electronic and feed on the information of light – hence also establish light as its fixed rod of measure or constant space, (relativity) but the universe has multiple world-views, and some are non-Euclidean (gravitational worldwide) some are atomic (smelling worldview) etc. Human eyes and mechanical eyes though are electronic, and their bits of information visual, hence Euclidean:

*In the graph the Euclidean world is caused by the 3 perpendicular arrows of light space-time to which we add the social colors. 2 more elements are needed to define our human space-time, first the organic relationships between our electronic eyes that feed on light, and the properties of information – as information is perceived in stillness, in an stop and go motion, similar to that of a film – so electrons go and move as waves, stop and feed and perceive light as particles, entangling its distances with other electrons in ‘fixed’ distances. Hence c-speed is always constant, our rod of space, as relativity proves, without giving the proper i-logic explanation.*

So our Euclidean mathematics, which as Descartes and Kant understood *is only the 3 perpendicular ‘space-time elements’ of a massless ray of light* merely shrinks all other scales of reality to fit into the mind:

In the graph, as our mind is electronic, we feed on light energy and transform it into an informative mapping of the Universe, reduced to what light sees. Thus our space is light space-time, with its 3 Euclidean coordinates, a fact that was first understood NOT by physicists but by impressionist artists, Leonardo, whose motto ‘saper vedere’, guided my inquire as a young artist on reality behind the languages that describe it, and then by the impressionists; and finally by Picasso, who departed from reality, affirming he painted thoughts, so he studied the ‘elements’ of the mind mapping, its entropic lines (cubist age) and its cyclical forms (female portraits).

A subject in itself fundamental to understand Relativity, is brought here to point out, the reason why in entropic only big-bang theories, we do see indeed light space-time expanding between galaxies, as light is space and so when it comes closer to the mass of the galaxy, elongates/red shifts its color (the only real effect observed; as we obviously are NOT out there in-between Andromeda and the Milky way with a tape). And vice versa, when Light collapses into our electronic ‘eye’ or any electronic source, it increases its frequency balancing both effect to cancel the supposed big-bang death of the Universe.

It is indeed essential for the reader to understand that linguistic mappings, stifle and deform the objective similarity of all beings.

So all kind of distorted images that carry a certain truth are possible, and relatively correct, but ONLY an objective analysis from the widest possible perspective, will make sense of all of them.

This widest Theory Of Everything, naturally can only be proposed by a Philosopher of Science, whose task is precisely to understand all the varieties of ‘formal motions’ and ‘ternary symmetries’ in space and time, measured by the infinite frames of reference of the Universe.

While each science and scientist will study a particular form and type of species in its detail, with more or less deformation according to the linguistic models it proposes, its specific ‘ego-centered paradox’ and the ‘worldly profession’, it engages with. Which of course the Philosopher of Science must also explain, to the chagrin of the different ‘Religions’, ‘Cultures’ and ‘Minervas of the North’, and the sure solitude that will engulf his work.

So how can we differentiate subjective truths, and biases? To that aim the philosopher of science has created the ‘Scientific method’, which the likes of Aristotle and Descartes established, and the likes of Galileo and Newton usurped and deformed.

But as we said all relative truths carry certain information, which is valid to create a mapping of reality and that is why subjective versions of reality do work and remain standing. Indeed, Ptolemy could perfectly establish the orbits of planets with the Earth at its center, just adding epicycles. But it was a very complicated motions. Thus Science considers the fundamental ‘tool’ to distinguish a higher objective truth from a subjective one, called Ockham’s razor: the simplest theory of reality which can explain the maximal number of facts is a more objective truth.

**The extension of mathematical truths. Languages imprint reality inversely to its complexity.**

So yes, maths do create as any language does reality as a mirror around the territory of the mind, since *ultimately the essence of space is to be a tapestry of an infinite number of frames or reference self-centred on the monads of each scale of Nature*.

However as languages are shared by multiple minds, when a language is ‘so extended’ because it is use by ‘selfs’ of the minimalist scales of space (in the case of maths, it is obviously the language in which the euclidean dimensions of light is written, while its non-euclidean fractal points are the language in which masses and charges are better described), the language’s truths have a quasi-infinite number of applications. Still many elements of GST cannot be explained with maths, but ALL elements of reality can be explained with the laws of GST. So above maths there is at least a language the NON-Æ LOGIC OF FRACTAL CYCLICAL space-time, described in those texts.

Further on, *there is a limit to the distortion and lack of focus of a language that finally becomes blind when too far removed from GST ultimate principles. i.e a B&W picture of a Rothko’s painting will not be relevant failing to see the vibrations of **colours, essence of it. *

A math description of Gospel will fail to grasp the expression of social love and the ∆-arrow of evolution expressed on it.

And in general, excessively formal, third age baroque languages, are inflations and fictions which fail to express reality, *as reality to exist must have ternary elements, entropy x information = energy, which means entropy simplifies always reality as pure language-i*nformation alone does NOT mix, imprint entropy-motion, which tends to simplicity. Water and oil then become disjointed and oil fails to explain water:

As the mind mirror of any language – not only mathematics, also human verbal mirrors – must ‘imprint’ the entropic motions of reality which resist its distortion, the final effect of baroque=max. informative languages is relatively limited both to describe accurately and distort/order reality.

This is truth specially in the physical world with maths because the physical world is simple and the range of imprinting almost infinite – not so much in the smaller territory of order of each mind-species, which indeed becomes ‘created’ by the tiƒ-singularity center, as it is a limited range. In the next graph we show fully that interaction, which in maths would mean a Tiƒ=pov=center of reference of a graph will order an extension, with a range inversely proportional to the content of information it delivers (range of forces, maximal for the ones with less information, minimal with the weak force of maximal form).

In that regard, *the true mirror language that ‘adapts’ reality better is the GST-language WHICH is the one embedded in the behaviour of each Tiƒ-singularity.*

**The need to translate gst into maths.**

All the said it is obvious that the quality of languages go as follows: Max. quality: GST.œ > Mathematics > Verbal thought.

And this means to *verify the value of mathematical physics, we can always ‘refer’ it to the elements of GST.Œ. A single example will suffice. We know by T.œ that systems have three elements. So an electromagnetic system and its equations, must refer to those three elements. Let us see if its equation scorrespond to them:*

*In the graph a charge will have the three natural parts of reality, the ‘cyclical membrane’, (i.e. in electromagnetism, the magnetic field), the central singularity (ie. the charge) and the intermediate flows of energy and information between both (the electric and magnetic currents induced by each other). *

*So we need the 4 laws of Heaviside<Maxwell of the graph to describe such physical systems.*

*YET they are NOT the a priori language that determines electromagnetism, but the ‘linguistic expression’ of the Fractal GST, SPACE-TIME GENERATOR OF SUCH SYSTEMS WITH:*

*Tiƒ: charge-singularity (1), Spe: magnetic field (2), and ST: the exchanges of motion=entropy and form=frequency between them (3,4).*

Of course, the purpose of science being mostly praxis makes the algebraic equations far more useful but the purpose of this blog being the ultimate whys, the spatial view shows how once and again nature can be reduced to the three arrows of timespace and the scales of the fifth dimension.

*And so IT happens for all laws of mathematical physics that we shall relate to the ‘laws and structures of ∆ºst systems’: its ultimate cause is NOT the fact they can be mirrored in a mathematical language but the fact they followed the ternary laws of GST, as 10 dimensional beings of fractal space-time, ∆ºst, which an ∆º mind with a self-centred pov can ‘perceive’.*

Thus we shall see how ultimately mathematical physics is related to those laws: differential equations will express fundamental gst actions between scales of the fifth dimension (entropic motions will be described by derivatives of second order, energy actions by those of first order and so on); topological laws will combine the three only topological variations as expressions of the three arrows of timespace of all beings; and each of the mathematical equations will be expressed from one of the three topological frames of reference (cartesian, polar or cylindrical). And so on and so on.

**∆nalysis, the ∆-scalar sub discipline best for mathematical physics.**

In that sense most physical equations have a general structure proper of mathematical physics, written with ∆nalysis – with derivatives or inverse integrals of one or second order – because most actions in the Universe are scalar, DESCRIBING INVERSE ARROWS OF ∑∆-1≤≥∆+1 flows of entropy and information for different systems of space-time, where an entropic/informative action: ∆+1<<∆-1; describes a double derivative/integral and an energetic ‘world cycle’, an integral in a single scale jump, ∆º≤≥∆1; while topological exchanges between the three elements of the system, will often appear al algebraic equations in a single plane. And not surprisingly, almost all of mathematical physics will be encoded in those simple ‘mathematical mirrors’ of the GST basic events between wholes and parts of the fifth dimension.

This is the essence of mathematical physics: the study with ∆nalysis of motions in the fifth dimension of a physical system of ∏ime§paœ.

So how to complete the theoretical minimum of realist mathematical physics? Again following the path of Einstein, which used the r=evolution of Lobachevski on geometry to upgrade our theory of space. Indeed, solved the 5th non-euclidean postulate of mathematics, noticing that space was not necessarily Euclidean, as points can hold infinite parallels. So he said we should look at space to decide experimentally how it ‘is’ really. This Hilbert didn’t understand and confused, without being able to define then what a point is, as it was no longer possible to define it as an Euclidean point with ‘no breath’, came with his idea that a point was what his mind imagine, and left it undefined. So the first task is obviously to *define a point as a mirror of the fractal Universe, where points grow and hold ‘infinite finitesimal parts’.*

While the logic of mathematics has to be upgraded from the present single causality of Aristotelian and its single time arrow, to the ternary non-aristotelian logic (meaning logic requires to study the 3 ARROWS OF TIME CAUSALITY as physicists working only with one arrow, entropy, have the MIRROR distorted, UNFOCUSED, and limited). An trust me when you do show, as I have done it, *light pours through your mind in a blast of intelligence and focused information, far more pure and telling than the blast of entropy, essayed at the LHC.*

Only a few examples. As we said lobachevski changed ALL the outlook of mathematical physics, when he found the 5th postulate of non-euclidean geometry, the fact that through a ‘point’, infinite parallels can cross and Einstein applied it to physical space in General Relativity. But lacking the understanding of ‘real space’, a fractal of scales of wholes and infinitesimals, and its correspondence with Analysis, physicists misinterpreted the meaning of those points, incurring in clear logic contradictions.

Indeed, to fit those lines they bended the ‘straight lines which define parallels’ to fit them into the point. But then they became ‘curves’, no longer parallels. Because they didn’t take seriously Lobachevski’s dictum that from then on geometry had to be an experimental science. So they missed the ‘meaning of a ‘non-euclidean point’, as *it is in Nature, where points grow in size when we look closer, in detail its inner ‘space-time, behind its ‘cyclical membrane’*. Indeed, if a POINT can be crossed by ∞ parallels:

– The Euclidean point is just the minimal information of a point fit in the homunculus reduced mind (: that shrinks it, to fit it inside. But this distorts it, because parallels are straight lines and a ‘point with no breath’ (Euclidean point) can only fit one line.

So to fit more lines, the point must be enlarged, when we come closer to it, so the point is no longer a star-point or a particle-point but a FRACTAL POINT of the scalar 5th dimension, which becomes a huge star and then yes! voila, infinite parallels which are now real parallel straight lines can cross it.

So reality allow us once more to define properly the first undefined postulate of Non-Euclidean mathematics: “a fractal point has a volume of energy and information that grows, as we come closer to it.”

And the second undefined Postulate: ‘A fractal line is a ‘wave’ (time view) or ‘string’ (spatial view) of fractal points, communicating energyy and information between two larger point-beings’.

And the 4th postulate, ‘a plane is a network of fractal points’.

And so on. This and NOT the ‘runaway definition’ of Hilbert, who confused by Lobachevski’s discovery just said for lack of a better idea that he ‘imagined points, lines and planes’ IS the proper, realist way to upgrade Geometry to reality as we have already upgraded topology and its 3 forms with motion to describe the 3 ‘organic forms’ of all systems of the Universe.

Why we bring this here – as we are selecting only the ‘theoretical minimum’ to fully grasp what CERN does and the position of the homunculus in the infinite Universe – should be obvious to the reader: Hilbert was wrong, so it is the Copenhagen interpretation derived of it. The fact that CERN will produce microscopic strangelets of black holes from the ‘larger’ scale of cosmological mass does NOT mean they are ‘infinitely small and harmless’ just because or mind does NOT see gravitation and so only sees them as point-particles. They ARE HUGE in terms of mass-density which IS as we shall soon show the ‘stuff’ that matters in the Gravitational cosmic scale of space-time. If we could SEE gravitation those points WILL grow, to hyperbolic dimensions filling MOST of the galaxy and we would shrink accordingly as ’empty bubbles’ of almost null mass.

But in the scalar REALITY, gravitation makes points LARGER when we observe them in the scale of the fifth dimension where they do interact above us, and will EASILY evaporate our ’empty bubble’ of light-light beings.

So Hilbert and Cantor who talked of ‘their imaginary paradise from where nobody would expel them, ass the Jihad warriors who die to enter paradise, just invented non-existen points, lines, planes with their imagination.

In the next graph, we see thus, the true meaning of the 5th and 1st Non-E postulate, which define both *the real fractal point (1st postulate) and the real mind that bends it into a smallish mind. Since the *fractal point does have breath, as it includes a volume of energy, entropy and information, carried by a relative number of ‘finitesimal’ parallel waves, but the ‘Aristotelian mind’, reduces it to an Euclidean point:

*We have to introduced the first postulate of non-Æ so you realise how ‘limited’ is the homunculus mind.*

Thus, human egos are* just finitesimals with a huge ego, because they confuse their zero point-mind with the real infinite Universe, of fractal points, thinking the volume of information they store in their mind is all. *

*Now, this theoretical minimum, which gives birth to the biggest r=evolution of maths since Riemann, ‘does away with Hilbert’; but to fully put the copenhagen interpretation to rest and complete the understanding of mathematics in experimental terms, we need as we have done with spatial geometry and topology, show how temporal algebra and its numbers, do also reflect reality, in an evolutionary process called the closure of numbers that again will follow the ternary, universal syntax of ‘REALITY’.*

The particle point features heavily in Nuclear physics and it is still a ‘mess’. I like of all of them, the Delta Function, which is ∞ at 0, 0 on the infinite line and 1 in its integral. It is perhaps the best mathematical definition and for that reason, Dirac without understanding what it means – the emergence of a point-particle as a 1-element of a higher ∆+1 scale, made it the non-rigurous foundation of its beautiful quantum thoughts. Then Newman quoted above got berserk. He wanted it to be ‘rigurously’ proved by Hilbert’s axiomatic arrogant method and just make it more messy, pedantic and obtuse.

It is ridiculous that a people, AXIOMATIC physicists, who understand so little of the whys of its systems, pretend to be so dogmatic as Popes with its infallibility theorems, just because ‘mathematics – they believe- is the language of god’ (Galileo).

So no further experimental proofs are needed.

In the graph, the final understanding on how 10 ∆-1 ‘tetratkys’ pythagorean elements become a bosonic point of identical beings to emerge in the delta function. It is in that sense connected as the fourier transform from where it ultimately departs, from a fascinating phenomena of the Universe, the *emergence through resonance, which I call ‘fusion love’, of a higher being, made of identical parts; as we are all resonances of cloned information; but only in a point the parts transcend into a whole; only in a neuronal small network your infinitesimal ego-mind believes to be infinite. *

**The reductionist ∆o human perspective of physical systems. Degrees of error.**

*The need for more than a language to describe the wholeness of physical systems.*

Now it is important to fully grasp why physics is wrong in its concepts and right in its equations. And perhaps the best example could be to compare it with the duality of Chinese language.

In the graph, it is possible to write in Chinese perfectly, as physicists write in equations, and make completely sense, without understanding a dot of it in verbal languages, the ‘natural conceptual language of people’. So a writer of mathematical physics will be right in its equations and fully use them for practical purposes, but it will ignore the conceptual, verbal meaning of those signs. And this is essentially what happens due to the errors of cyclical time and fractal space. Cyclical time measured by frequencies is the inverse of time duration, so in equations, t=1/ƒ are both right. But conceptually we shall ad an entire new ‘world of subtle differences’, thanks to our advanced ‘verbal thought’. Moreover, while there are only a standard ‘traditional’ and modern way to write mathematical physics (due mainly to the evolution of the language of mathematics), the simplified language is quite good to coney most meanings, even if the traditional has much more depth of meaning and symbols. So we shall find that for example, the 4 constructions of gravitation, Newton’s T-vortices of time; Einstein’s, S-imultaneous pictures of the vortices in greater detail; Poison’s gradient in ∆-scales and the Hamiltonian-Lagrangian more elegant, •-mental description, are variations of the same theme; as often in chinese the subtle differences of pronunciation give us variations of meaning.

*But if we do not know both languages, the wholeness and richness of Chinese and Physical systems would be lost to us, and we could on top make silly errors, as those foreigners do with the word ma in its 4 tones, unable to distinguish them, and so calling a mother a joint, or even worst, a horse. And physicists, we shall find do have many of those errors, specially when interpreting wrongly Time AS A SINGLE arrow and space as a continuum, LOOSING the 4 ∆•st perspectives of knowledge, the scales of the 5th dimension, the mental limits of languages that describe them and the 3 ages of time and its functional symmetry with the 3 forms of space. *

As physics is today mathematical physics, it deals mainly with time and space parameters in different dimensions and scales. As it only acknowledges lineal time, it misses the ternary structure of time arrows, but obviously as its equations works, it merely expresses them in mathematical parameters without its whys which is what GST ads:

We shall study those errors as they were understood historically departing from ∆o, the anthropomorphic human mechanical scale and our sense of entitlement.

So we apply one of the simple rules of epistemological truth in ΓST:’The further away from the human being a science is, the higher the error of its data’.

It is indeed important to introduce the bias of physics from an objective perspective – our definition of the mind as a self-centered o-point; and to study the bias of each discipline of physics, which grows as we come further away from that human perspective. *Hence a second rule for the search of truth in physics:*

‘As all scales of reality are isomorphic, we must seek errors comparing far away sciences to the truths of systems closer to us’. This means that indeed, as Einstein and Bohm wanted, the *way to do physics is NOT to widen the errors of the Copenhagen interpretation with ridiculous theories of parallel Universes etc. but to explain them in a realist way with the guiding pilot wave theory and explain the ‘spooky effects’ with GST isomorphisms, as all of them have a natural explanation in the Generator of Space Time (Ab. gst). So we can fast review the main scales of physics on account of its bias; and establish such order from minus to major, as the proper way to TEACH physics, which is also the historic way, as we have first resolved the most evident stience:*

*∆0, 1: Mechanics, which is the the most evolved of those disciplines in its details, and the less erroneous as it deal with our external world of ‘evident measure’ and perception.*

∆-1,2: The inner, thermodynamic world of our body-motions AND outer world of Geological systems (co-shared with mechanics).

We find now thermal physics a first huge error – the belief that entropy is the single arrow of time; whose cause is sociological and historical in the worldly profession of physicists, and its hyperbolic thirst for taking the place of us, philosophers of stience, as the summit of knowledge (: it was studied first in the use of cannonballs and weapons and vapor machines, who do indeed waste energy into entropy, and then widened in a galactic statement of self-importance to the shoe Universe with big bang theory, which dismisses the balancing Tiƒ force of in-form-ation, implosive gravitation ).

∆±3: Thus, as we go away from our perspective and introduce other scales we shall observe the growth of uncertainty (quantum) and dark spaces (cosmology) and the astounding anthropomorphic deformation of perspectives introduced to justify them (Copenhagen interpretation, cosmic big-bang, anthropic principle).

Obviously the anthropic principle and the big bang once, we debunk its manipulated data, will appear as just another form of ‘creationist science’ a religious disease which is the commanding influence of economics, a biblical religion of go(l)d profits, as it is today, and the disguised one of so many anthropomorphic errors. The copenhagen interpretation is even more puzzling as we do HAVE a deterministic, far more proper interpretation in the Einstein->Broglie->Bell->Bohm interpretation. And the fact that the illusory ideas of Bohr had dominated the philosophy of quantum physics shows much more about power and anthropomorphism in science that about truth.

The general error: anthropomorphism and lineal worldly profession of weapons’ masters

This said, all physical systems do lack 1/2 of the paradigm – its analysis as supœrganisms which perform world cycles of existence. As all of them sponsor the worldly error of ‘lineal time’, Galileo’s delight for artillery masters, also caused by its worldly profession as makers of weapons (essentially the same error than the thermal one), and all of them deny biological properties to matter (the human must remain the only intelligent, living being).

It is* important to remember this ‘paradox of uncertainty’ of human self-centred knowledge, which applies in earnest to those scales, as humans are too far removed from them and so they accept only an abstract, mathematical description, which does not explore as we do here, the biological whys, its world cycles and organic structures, in physical systems.*

Hence while physics does study all the scales (maximal range of stiences) it does so with the minimal quantity of properties (reduced mostly to one of the 8 motions, locomotions, and one language, mathematics).

The modern error: Hilbert’s arrogant idealism: i imagine points.

Then there is cultural error, hauling from German Idealism, which brought us Nazism, Communism and Physical theories of Platonic numbers creating the Universe without substance, breaking the FIRST AND FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD, ‘experimental evidence’ also called ‘hylomorphism’, which since Aristotle applies: *You cannot have a real event/form without a substance, or ‘∆-1 parts’ that make them possible.*

Yet in Germany at the turn of the century in the paroxysm of the idealist culture, it was supposed that the ‘language of maths, hence the mind of man created the Universe’, not the other way around (languages are mirrors of a real substance). So physicists got away with murder (the killing of real substances) under the influence of Hilbert’s axiomatic method, which unable to grasp Lobacjevski’ pan geometry of non-euclidean fractal points, resolved here, said the postulates of geometry had to be substituted by the concept the mathematician ‘imagined points and lines’, and constructed the world from the mind out. It is the same concept of religion, in which GOD ‘SPEAKS’ words and when he speaks, he creates. So Allah or Yhwh says ‘man’ and man zas! appears, and Hilbert, the God of mathematicians (the language of god in Galileo’s tantrum) said ‘I imagine lines’ and zas! lines be=come’ LOL.

So without the need for ‘real substances’ both Bohr and Einstein became also imaginary, ‘postulating people’; that is people who ‘imagine’ postulates without proof as certain and zas! 100 years latter, nobody dares to explain why the postulate of *constancy of c-speed and what is even worse, the never said by Einstein, limit of c-speed which only applies within light space-time (the ∆-3 scale of galaxies) MUST have a logic rational substance-oriented cause, as we shall explain here with GST laws; and why quantum waves are NOT imaginary probabilities but as Einstein->Broglie->Schrodinger->Bell->Bohm clarified densities of a fractal electron made of its ∆-1 relative cellular parts (ultra dense photons that collapse an ST wave of light into particle, Tiƒ state). *

(The quantum realist interpretation is there for 100 years, so we don’t innovate just enlighten it. The proper interpretation of the c-speed postulate and its limiting application to the ∆>-3 scales is an immediate offshoot of the stop and go, Tiƒ>Spe rhythm of motion and so it is ‘new≈blue’ GST at its best)

The positive side to it. Simplification reveals the ultimate truths of reality

On the positive side the limits of human physics are of special interest as they will reveal easily the connections between the GST (ab. Generator of Space-time) and its mathematical (1st science) and physical world, as the physicist who strips off biological, organic properties physical systems, leaves untouched – once the errors of cyclical time and fractal space are corrected, the connection with those primary disciplines; which the biorganic paradigm will complete specially in the limits not perceived of quantum and cosmology; as the galaxy can easily be ‘modelled’ as a cell

Needless to say we are not writing the encyclopaedia of mathematical physics available to any specialist but ad on all those parts and properties which are not properly written. So in astronomy we shall concentrate in the study of the galaxy as a cell, in quantum theory in the correct Broglie->Bohm model and in thermodynamics in the correction of a single entropy arrow and clarification on the meaning of it, and in all scales in the key concepts of the 3 arrows of time, space, its generators and the concepts of Energy, and the events of physics, which represent GST actions, and key equations to describe them (Fourier, for time scales; Hamiltonians for Energy; Lagrange for balanced actions).

That is, we shall explain why certain basic functions represent most events of physics in terms of the organic ad-ons needed to complete its whys, such as the ST- ‘action of harmonic oscillators’, which is basically a basic ‘feeding-perceiving action that makes the particle fluctuate as it emits a wave of information, upwards to the point of maximal perception and minimal motion (maximal amplitude) and downwards through the 0-coordinates of maximal speed-entropy and minimal height-information.

So it is important the reader understands the basics of space-time dimension.

**Absolute relativity: a Universe of ****scale ****ratios: information density, entropy speed and existential momentum. **

Thus mathematical physics can describe in Physical systems all the properties of GST systems. Why they don’t do it?

It is a question of anthropomorphism, which has not fully evolve mathematics. Since humans ∆º minds, mostly visual, have understood mathematical systems in its simplest geometric, spatial pov, applying them to investigate mostly mathematical equations concerned with dynamical changes in motion an space.

So astrophysics is only a part of gst because of human limits to accept intelligent properties to all forms of matter, not because mathematics describes an abstract Universe.

It is the limited humind, ∆º perception with only an Spatial point of view, and the simplex logic of a single arrow of time (Aristotelian), and a single level of space, ∆, what has kept the mathematical language mostly in the primitive Euclidean geometry of greek mathematics.

So once we are aware of those shortcomings and upgrade the discipline to §paœ-ðime ternary principles of the generator equation many new solutions and whys to old ones are found.

A key ‘theorem’ of reality, which has escaped so often humans – though physicists are generally aware of it – is that ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY implies all quantities THAT MATTER are **ratios** that express different relationships between Sp, Tƒ and ST, which can ‘travel’ between scales, helping us to unify concepts of each scale (often expression of the particular spe x tif= ∆constant metric for each ∆i).

So for example, density matter more than *mass, and when making mathematical physics we find density has a much wider range of applications. So we can use three similar equations of density of information in three scales (variations in equations of quantum physics are due to the wrong interpretation, as canonical quantum MUST be**Broglie-Bohm’s** pilot-wave theory with its full ternary elements, including the quantum field ignored in the Copenhagen version – so we shall for the sake of simplicity often reduce our examples to ∆+1 & ∆-scales):*

We observe also on those equations, which basically red ∂density/∂t=-∂flux/∂s³, some basic ‘translations’ of the laws of GST into mathematical physics; where the three main ratios≈time arrows are:

- Spe: Past entropy speed, s/t; Tiƒ: information density, its inverse and ST: PRESENT, ‘momentum-flux-existential force’.

It is then obvious *that some general rules of creation of events in mathematical physics will be:*

*Spe<>Tiƒ: Since ‘entropy’ and ‘information’ are inverse parameters and in the multiple different ways we express them, we shall find ‘inverted’, x/, ∫∂, equations that put both in relationship.*

*Tiƒ±Spe><ST. Thus a system ‘develops’ a certain present momentum, by adding to an entropy or information parameter the other inverse parameter in a complementary fashion, creating a dynamic equality.*

And this is the case of the previous equations, where the mass or temperature of a stationary system (Tiƒ parameter of ∆+1 or ∆o scales) ads speed and the result is an ST-present-momentum parameter – the product of the velocity of motion of the medium with its density, which is called** its flux. **The flux vector of the mass is q = ρυ.

So we can interpret those equations as dynamic creations of a present event or flux, departing from a Tiƒ parameter (temperature in ∆0, which becomes heat flux, mass in ∆+1, which becomes density flux)

THUS as a consequence of the ternary principles of the generator equation of ∆-scales, the principle of absolute relativity ads relativity of scale and hence defines only relative magnitudes which are constant ratios that travel through scales: So for example speed of spatial translation is better than absolute space-distance (S/t) and can ‘travel’ as a parameter between scales. And ‘density of information’ is better than absolute information, provided by a cyclical vortex, than absolute mass, and can travel through scales, so we can talk in the ∆º thermodynamic scale of heat flux, of ∆+1 mass flux and ∆-1 charge intensity, all parameters of density of information and its flux-motion in each scale, once *we understand mass, charge and temperature as clocks of time moving towards the future of more information, as all attractive in-forma-tive vortices do.*

RATIOS not absolute values are thus the only constants of mathematical physics that matter.

**Ratios limit reality to the ‘region around the ∆º being’, making virtual, uncertain, dark the scales beyond.**

The ratio concept is over pervading in all systems, which can be considered to act from the pov of an ∆º±1, mind observing mostly a self-centred, ∆º scale of space-time size, and its adjacent macrocosms, or ‘world’, ∆+1 and microcosms or ‘hyperbolic fractal cells’ of its inner world.

Nothing else matters, and so at a certain ‘distance’ of its ∆º scale, on the lower part

What this mean is that we consider ratios such as c-speed of light, S/Ti, or rather speed of transmission of information, and density, M(t)/V(s), or density of gravitational information per volume of space as ‘real mathematical parameters, which therefore will be all manifestations of the standing points in time/space of a world cycle or super organism:

S≈t, t/s and s/t will then become the steady state variable, speed-entropy variable, and density-information variable ratios of more value for the study of physics, of which classic physics uses the concepts of speed-length (s/t) and mass-density (t/s) and frequency as its classic concepts.

Thus we can say that in GST mathematical physics is the description with entropy-speed ratios, information-density ratios and momentum ratios.

Now it might be observed as t=1/ƒ, the existence of inverse functions with meaning in the universe, S=t and S=1/ƒ, ƒ x S = K gives us an immediate number of variations on the ratios that become parameters studied by mathematical physics, and further on those ratios or constants are multiplied by the fact that mathematical physics exist in several scales. Finally we need to observe and analyse what of those quantities and ratios are for each sale of the mathematical Universe the proper one, and then we can use all this added knowledge to expand mathematical physics in conceptual levels, even if we do not ad on the ∆st organic perspectives to the subject.

WE MUST understand that the scalar Universe implies an absolute relativity principle: we are not concerned with single parameters but with ratios between the ∆ST elements of the Universe. Thus instead of length, mass and time, (and its opposite frequency, 1/t), we are more concerned with s/t ratios of speed, t/s ratios of density and the measure of time with frequency ages and space with quanta. Then we can easily translate mathematical physics and enlighten many questions of it, as we shall do in the parts dedicated to astrophysical sciences.

**The virtual Universe of mathematical Povs.**

The ratio nature of physical systems IS the key TO a philosophical understanding of physical reality as an absolute virtual reality where to know you have to measure. In this sense while we prefer the more complete Bohm’s interpretation of quantum physics, which brings the much needed quantum field of the ∆-1 scale of >c forces; it is also important to nice that the ‘*moon does appear when we see it’ regarding ∆±>3 scales beyond the entropy-death limit of dissolution of a system and this fact will be the key to fully grasp why the mathematical description of relativity and quantum has made use of the ill-understood Hilbert’s concept, ‘I imagine points, lines and planes’. *

Particle-points from the pov of the observer are indeed particle points even if they ‘hold a Universe within themselves’. Do they exist? For all purposes the mind-monad doesn’t go experimentally beyond ∆±3, *to create its subjective mapping-linguistic-virtual consciousness of being. Reality on my view does exist, but we ARE linguistic perceivers and nothing else there is beyond, for all matters. And that is why we ‘feel’ the Universe to be mathematical, as we ARE projecting the mathematical mind which is the only thing we ‘extract’ (along other senses of man), from the Universe. I think therefore I am is thus indeed how far we can go. *

It is then when we realise it is often difficult to distinguish what is real behind the screen of linguistic perceiver.

I.e. Man is clearly made with 10 fingers to perceive 10-scales. We, as perceivers mainly measure in the S=10 logarithmic scales of the factual Universe. It is then a real reality of 10 scales? Logically the ternary 3 x 3 +0 symmetry seems to prove so.

What about the Unification equation of charges and masses that converts each galaxy into an atom and so it reduces further the number ofvariations of scales to an infinite game of ¨¹¹11 variations on the same theme?

Here again mind-mirrors and reality make indistinguishable both worlds beyond which nothing can be observed, but I am on the opinion that the Universal fractal offers more variations; so the galaxy *is only similar to the atom*.

What about its immortality and infinity? Here again we can’t definitely assess it. All seems to indicate the game of russian dolls in which the largest beings have larger population of smaller beings is *not infinitely perceivable. Since*, the closed nature of those 10 planes in scales and the virtual existence of zero energy balance across all those scales makes a whole ‘one’, ∆º±11, the limiting fractal game of space-time events flows and super organisms, *even at logic level and that is what we shall call ‘God’:Γœ∆ (the logic limit, larger than the experimental one)*.

L**et us then establish the ‘closure’ of the perceived Universe** above and below (atoms and galaxies), within the limits of human ‘absolute perception’ (we can perceive almost all what a galaxy and an atom is as the limiting membranes below and above of our existence), of the Universe and its 9 perceived scales (being 10 the logarithmic scale of the whole, which we do not perceive for the whole cosmos); by solving the most seek about equation, saint grail of physical stiences, 100 years in the search… the Unification equation of masses and charges… which is a good way to introduce how we apply T.œ and its isomorphisms to physics:

**PHYSICAL SYSTEMS**

**A new philosophy and method in physics.**

**The mathematical creationists: Galileo>Newton>Bohr**

Physicists believe in a mathematical, creationist theory of reality: mathematical equations are real and hence they somehow create reality. Relational space-time departs from a previous layer of reality: space-time.

So it does NOT matter how complicated a physicist makes his equations, just because he writes them IT DOES NOT CREATE REALITY. Because at best an equation is a focused mirror on the properties and relational space-time beings of the Universe. BUT MIRRORS DO NOT CREATE the IMAGES THEY REFLECT in their language.

The ongoing absurd quarrel between creationist religious people defending God’s verbal language (first age of human history, when mathematics, a more efficient mirror which seems to be NOT OUR MENTAL language but the language of machines) vs. the mathematical language, those machines (clocks measuring time, telescopes and microscopes measuring space) are evolving fast into a ‘digital AI consciousness’) is a false concept of the relationship between languages, as mirrors of the Universe, and the Universe of space-time they mirror, latter studied in detail, to set straight the record.

Of that argument what matters most is not even discussed: while mathematics is more efficient as a language, it is NOT the human language, but the language of machines, and so in a society which despises as it does today our technological culture, the human verbal language, which naturally make us the ‘subject’ and centre of the Universe (I-man: subject < verb=action> object=energy abused by man), and hence considers human life sacred, will NOT evolve machines so fast but will ensure with ethic values our survival.

While mathematics, being a better mirror will evolve knowledge faster but also will give primacy to computers, as it has done already, atrophy our verbal language, degrading our mind (as it is happening with our millenials, glued to hypnotic screens) and ultimately make humans obsolete to the superior mind-mirror of AI robots.

While those who practice only mathematics, as physicists at cern do, WILL become children of verbal, ethic, survival human thought and will be subconsciusly eviL=anti-live in the genetic hidden meanings of survival words, *as cogito ergo sum in man (calculo ergo sum in machines and physicists), so without cogitans, the ‘nerd’ is a child in life and does not even understand death and survival.*

So if languages are mirrors that create IMAGES not reality what are the substances of reality? This obvious. Look around yourself, do you see numbers as components of things, do you see words, or do you see ‘space’, broken in infinite vital spaces, ‘enclosed’ by membranes, which when seeing in great detail are made of moving cycles of cells (life clocks), orbital rotary cycles (earth’s clocks) and so all is ‘vital space’ enclosed by time cycles? That is what experience tell us all is: a vital space, broken, closed and formed by time cycles – the substances of reality, which if you like the word ‘god’ you can call god.

**The realists of space-time: Leibniz>Einstein>This Blog**

And this view is called in science the ‘relational space-time theory’ of the Universe, which is what i finally after millennia of being explained in philosophical terms, formalised with logic and mathematics, and then used to explain an enormous amount of whys in all the sciences of the Universe.

Reality is the product of the two ultimate substances that make up everything, vital, space quanta, and cyclical moving time clocks, of information, which combine into energetic beings with its repetitive patterns we call laws of science.

And it does NOT matter how much evidence physicists deny about the arrow of information and mass that balances the arrow of entropy and makes the Universe immortal, how much they deny the 96% of attractive dark matter, the Universe did NOT appear in a huge big-bang.

And it does not matter how many humans believe in those 2 theories (abrahamic creation, big bang creation), all in fact either in one (western religious people) or the other (physicists’ fans), *if they are rationally wrong they are wrong. But to prove them wrong we must debunk their theories of time-space, aka big-bang and black hole evaporation theories – and as we shall see explain properly in terms of time events the weak force, which is ultimately the force that transforms quarks intimately related to time cycles.*

* Thus it is essential to upgrade the chip of science in timespace theory as we shall do in the third * theoretical section of this blog that explains those relational space-time models and apply them to physics, big-bang theory, black hole evaporation.

Time theory’s next big advance IS not the evaporation of black holes but the models of relational, fractal cyclical space-time that will become the staple food of serious XXI century research in all physical, biological and sociological disciplines, as all of them are made of events that happen in time and the cyclical patterns of time do *explain the whys of science, which are the repetitive patterns=cycles of time of all its particular clocks, or else without cyclical patterns of time there would not be science, which consists exactly in the repetition of those clocks we can foresee.*

If time cycles did not exist, and the single lineal clock of physicists were the only time, there is NO reason for repetition of events which is What LAWS OF SCIENCE TELL us.

**A relational theory of space-time: what we study: ternary symmetries and dual space-time motion x form = dimensions and energy cycles.**

The laws of science are NOT originated by a language, maths or words, according to which creationist theory you believe in – religion or platonic physics but by the SUBSTANCES OF WHICH REALITY IS MADE, SPACE, CLOSELY RELATED TO the arrow of growth of ENTROPY or expansive open disordered motions, and accelerated TIME CLOCKS, CLOSELY RELATED to the arrow of growth of information carried in the frequency and form of the accelerated cycles of charges and masses, (Einstein’s principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass) and its conserved closed, repetitive ENERGY cycles, whose minimal unit is momentum, combination of mass/charges=accelerated time clocks x speed-distances (entropic motions).

So those are the 3 arrows of space-time that create reality of which we are all made, including humans, as when you say ‘i don’t have energy and time to do this’.

We shall thus study the physical ternary systems, or ‘space-time organisms’, which are the fundamental particle in the Universe, and co-exist also in physical ternary scales.

It is though necessary to be aware of the distortions of the mind both in the measure of those physical systems that ‘dwindle’ and ‘increase its errors’ as we go through the scalar dimensions of the Universe, in different fashion upwards and downwards, and the duality of motion and ‘linguistic form’ of the mind, which establishes key paradoxes to understand the dimensions of the Universe.

In essence, the human being limits its perception of those far away physical systems, to the simple dimensions of space-time: pure form, and motion, treating all particles as points, as if they didn’t have inner dimensions (except in the duality of open space and closed time strings, with its 10 dimensions, which closely resembles a pure ∆st analysis of reality, as it is void of experimental distorting influences). So philosophically we must wonder if the galaxy-atom, our limits which are perceived similarly are ‘seen so similar’ because that is how the mind distorts reality as we travel away from the self-centred human thermodynamic scale.

In any case, the space-time method, as opposed to the mathematical and verbal method, IS more complex because it goes A LEVEL OF DEPTH below that of language, to study how languages distorts a background space-time reality.

It is also more accurate as it includes those distortions, and recognising them, ads the sentient properties huminds only recognise to the very close similar species (higher mammals) and the biological organic properties derived of the co-existence of multiple planes, joined by networks and singularity membrains, which physicists do not recognise.

So the method we shall consider to study all those systems will be *completely different to that of physicists or religious people, which start from a dogmatic acceptance that the language per se is the origin of reality, so the religious man studies the ‘sacred scriptures’ and the physicist, the ‘sacred equations of mathematics’ IN THE VERSION UTTERED by the prophet, not joking here. *

As mathematics has NOT YET being fully evolved as we shall do in this blog, to give vital properties to systems. It is then necessary to depart for a full understanding of nature in 3 steps before making equations of physics, steps underlying the proper scientific method escaped by physicists:

- FIRST TO consider the properties of space time, its ternary symmetries, ternary time§paœrganisms, and the general laws that rule them across ∆-scales, S-topologies and t-ages; and how its singularity membrains ‘enclose’ inwards and outwards those open ‘balls’.
- Then we need to evolve further vital mathematics to properly account for those ‘fundamental particles’, the time§paœrganisms (ab.T.œ), in a more proper way by adapting the space continuum to the fractal structure of reality, which we can easily achieve by completion of the non-euclidean revolution started by lobachevski and riemann and Einstein in physics. So we shall define a fractal point of dimension 1, a line-wave, a network plane, relative similarity instead of congruence, and the mind as a point crossed by infinite parallels of entropy and information, transforming the abstract point into a time§paœrganism, T.œ. And affirm that T.œ is a theory of everything organic, and everything is a T.œ or part of one such Time§paœrganisms.
- We can then study the isomorphic laws of those T.œs, as they are common to all systems, derived of the 4 components of all beings, @-linguistic minds, space topologies, time ages and scales, which we roughly subdivide in 3 sub-elements for a total of 12 sets of laws, enough to enclose all the laws, parts and events of every T.œ of the Universe.
- Only then equipped with the proper understanding of T.œ and its non-Æ mathematical and ternary logic formalism we can study physics, and we shall do it not from equations upwards, but from those T.œ, the photon, atom, molecule, matter state and gravitational being, and its vital isomorphic laws, which then can be described analytically in its actions, parts, co-existing flows and networks with mathematical tools of measure, to differentiate them and know its details.

**∆+3 (galaxies) ≈∆-3: atoms**

*A sample case of fractal 5D physics: Unification equation of charges and masses.*

**The unification equation: charges (∆-3) ≈ masses; atoms (∆-3) ≈ galaxies (∆+3)**

*In graph, 3+i scalar ‘big-bang’s at 3+i levels: a Hydrogen, excited sp atom, which is born of the beta decay (big-bang of a nucleon); a galaxy (ours), born of a quasar big-bang (a black hole); and the supposed big-bang of the universe, whose main proof is a mapping of the background radiation obtained ‘only’ on local measures on the same galactic region. *

*The form of each scalar big bang is similar, as the ‘Fractal scales of the 5 ^{th} dimension’ are ruled by the same isomorphic laws. Now the imaginary big bang is likely to be the cosmic as it is so similar to the form of the galaxy in which its local measures of Bg are taken that it seems to be a hyperbolic human expansion of the scale of its real experimental ‘proofs’. *

*Let us remember again that we can only take measures in the surroundings of a small planet and so we must adscribe phenomena to the most local possible domain for an exact theory (basic rule of truth in science: restrict theories to the area of experimental evidence.) Thus the local big bang with a ‘signature’ called B.G. of the exact form of the galaxy is a local phenomena.*

Let us consider an example of what we mean by complexity vs. simplicity. In physics a TOE is reduced to the unification not of all sciences and all languages of knowledge, but only of the 4 forces of nature, gravitation, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak force.

This is the saint grail of physicists, which for a century have miserably failed. Why? If as we prove in our article on the Physical TOE, the unification is a mathematical, trivial result of the metric of the 5th dimension? Because they try to achieve that unification with the more complex formulations of quantum and gravitational physics (General relativity and chromo/electrodynamics).

Yet before we introduce the equation in its simpler ‘Newtonian terms’, we must explain you two things:

That time has three ages in physics, and *future, in-form-ative time is only accelerated time vortices:*

In the graph, steady state, present angular momentum without acceleration doesn’t change local time; entropy, devolves time in big-bangs to the past: ∃=mc². Only accelerated time which increases the form of the system is future time, which in the physical world is represented by the charges and masses, sinks of time that accelerate/transform/inform past fields into attractive VoRo=K-vortices.

**Equivalence between Mass and Acceleration. Einstein’s Concept of Mass as a Frequency of Information**

** ***In the graph, the evolution of the concept of mass in relativity, from the initial image of an abstract substance in the center of an accelerated vortex of space-time, proper of the abstract, pre–world war age, when Einstein first published his work on gravitation, to the first pictures obtained in bubble chambers in the postwar age, to the realization that each mass is a fractal space-time made of smaller cyclic motions proper of twenty-first century.*

In the graph, for the pedantic observer, which rejects Newton as too simple, over seeded by Einstein, a final note on the multiple perspectives we can have of any event of space-time according to the ∆±1 or Sp, Tƒ, ST perspective we adopt, we classify the 4 standing models of gravitation as relative truths, belonging to the 4 perspectives of reality: Sp< =>Tƒ.

In the graph the 4 obvious descriptions of mathematical physics regarding gravitation: T**iƒ** (relativity, dominant in form)≈ Ft (Newton – dominant in dynamic motion) <-> Ps (Poisson, dominant in past spatial field/gradient-form)≈ Se (Lagrange, dominant in the analysis of the balances of entropic motion-energy):

Ft: Newton is a moving CLOCK LIKE vortex of the same mass-motion regions)

Ps: Poisson is a potential static field of energy gradients..

Se: Hamiltonian-Lagrangian is a dynamic description of the conservative energy of the system.

Tiƒ: Einstein’s simultaneous measures in relativity are a still, formal description in ‘present’ of the gravitational space-time.

And so all of them are equivalent. In fact Einstein derived his work via Poisson from Newton. Today Relativity’ informative mappings of the galaxy space-time are transformed in AMD theory into a Lagrangian-Hamiltonian ‘bidimensional model’, for computer calculations, proving once more the bidimensional structure of space-time.

All are in fact derived one from each other, as Einstein took its beginnings from Poisson, who elaborated on Newton; and the more important of them all the Hamiltonian).

Fractal relativity means on the other hand, that the larger wholes emerge from the smaller ones. So the larger masses emerge from the smaller motions of strong quarks. Its synchronic collective, bigger motions are quark stars, pulsars, and black holes. Today we can model any type of vortex of space-time with fractal mathematics, as each small vortex transfers the momentum to the bigger vortex, which emerges as a macroscopic entity.

Thus, we conclude that a black hole is a fractal concentration of the densest matter of the Universe, quarks, since quarks represent on average more than 99.9% of the matter of our bodies. Those improvements on the details of mass theory, based on the advancement of its mathematical tools (discovery of fractals, chaos theory, and the five postulates of non-Euclidean geometry) is the natural way in which the evolution of science happens, departing from sound logic principles.

In the text quoted from the *New Scientist* that opened chapter 2, we came to the conclusion that the Universe has a fractal structure because it is made of fractal space and fractal time. But what is space and time? In simple terms, here are the two essential morphologies of the Universe: Space is the lineal, expansive energy of the vacuum in eternal motion (seeing as still distance or space, according to the paradox of Galileo). And fractal times are cyclical clocks of information, whose frequency or rhythm encodes the information of the Universe.

So space and lineal energy on one side and time and cyclical clocks of information on the other are synonymous. The static, continuous concepts of space and time become then sums of discontinuous, moving pieces of energy and infinite clocks of information that our senses put together into an abstract continuous single space-time.

One we have “exploded” and given movement to the abstraction of space and time, it is easy to recognize the minimal bytes of energy and bits of information of the real, physical Universe. Physical information, masses and charges, and physical energy, forces, which are not substances but motions, events in time of cyclical, informative nature (masses and charges) or energetic, spatial, expanding shape (energy), that constantly transform into each other ad eternal, creating the essential rhythm of the physical Universe:

*E (forces) < => Tƒ- Particles (masses and charges)*

The key to grasp the concept of mass as a vortex of acceleration are two physical laws: one of classic relativity, the principle of equivalence between accelerated motions and masses, and one of fractal relativity, the paradox of Galileo, the fact that we perceive reality either as a moving energy (in the case of a mass, as a vortex) or as fixed space (in the case of mass as a particle). All moves and doesn’t move depending on the way we look at it. Thus, all spaces have inner motion, even if our senses don’t see that motion or fix that motion into forms of in/form/ation.

Mass is the great problem unresolved by quantum physicists in their model of the Universe since it is not an energetic but an informative form. Einstein, who had a visual, geometrical image of mass, defined it as a vortex that absorbed space-time, attracting in its flow everything else traveling on that space-time as a bathtub attracts all what is in the water it absorbs.

How did Einstein come to that idea? As many textbooks and visualizations explain, he realized that when we accelerate, as it happens in a Formula 1 car or a lift, we feel more weight. Thus, he made a bold statement: mass and acceleration are the same. If we feel mass when we accelerate, it is because mass is acceleration. But what type of acceleration?

The answer is actually quite simple, because it turns out that Newton had long ago discovered a beautiful formula to describe all the forces of the Universe: F=m × a.

Where *a *means a lineal acceleration and so *m* must be a cyclical acceleration. Indeed, there are no more types of accelerations and so Einstein (using, of course, more complex mathematics than Newton to refine his calculus, as mathematics had evolved a lot since Newton’s time) postulated that masses would be vortices of space-times *since only a vortex is a cyclical, accelerated movement.*

That principle of equivalence is the fundamental principle in which general relativity is based. It states merely that mass and cyclical acceleration are the same. It means in layman terms that a mass is not a material form but a movement. And of course, because that movement is an inward, cyclical movement, it deploys a resistance to be pushed outward in a lineal manner, which from our macroscopic view seems to give mass a solid position.

Again this is intuitive. If you are a very small being turning at full speed, it will be very difficult to push you away. When you see a skater in a ring, he speeds up and closes his arms to move faster and become more stable in his position. Thus, the homology between acceleration and mass defines for a curved space the meaning of a mass, and the paradoxical fact that the smaller the vortex is, the faster it turns and the bigger the mass is. It is the same that happens in any tornado or hurricane: the closest you are to the center, the faster you turn and the more attractive the tornado is.

In that sense, what you experience as weight is the inertial resistance to any displacement of a vortex anchored in a point of space-time. The same happens in our macro universe when a skater turns around and bends his arms to spin faster. If he opens his arms spreading his vortex, he decelerates and moves easier in a lineal direction.

A mass is thus the inertial force that we need to push away, the accelerated vortex. Those vortex like spirals accelerating in a curved path, inward, are like the pictures we observe in accelerators, or the most recent pictures of masses we have obtained, in which indeed we see a fluctuating vacuum with the form of a vortex. Further on, we know that the frequency or rotational speed of those vortices, called spins, is related to the mass of each particle. So we have both, logic and experimental proofs. Of course, I have used here and will continue using the simple mathematics of Newton and the visual thought experiments of Einstein, to describe those concepts because this is a book for non-specialists.

Already Descartes said that the Universe was made of vortices and “res extensa,” that is, lineal space. What Einstein did was to apply the most modern non-Euclidean mathematics of his day to those well-known principles. So he improved greatly the detail of those vortices, as non-Euclidean geometry allowed much more refined calculations than those we could do with the mathematics of Newton, but in essence the principles stayed. So we can explain very easily in an intuitive manner, thanks to the principle of equivalence, a mass with a simple equation:

*Equivalence principle: mass = curved acceleration= cyclical vortex that resists displacement*

If we use the simpler mathematics of Newton to define Einstein’s mass, we can see in more detail the properties of such vortices, which can be described as *fluid vortices of the bits of information, the particles that create any of the multiple fractal space-time membranes of the Universe. Consider the simplest bidimensional equation of a vortex:*

*Vortex Speed × Radius-size of vortex = Vo × Ro = Constant Value*

Since the product of the speed and the radius is constant, the shorter the radius, the faster the speed. What this means is that any vortex paradoxically accelerates faster when it is smaller. So the product of a growing speed and diminishing radius remains constant. Hence we find that smaller particles that rotate faster have more mass. So the electron, which is bigger and rotates slower than the quark has less mass. In fact, the electron’s mass is 0.1% of the mass of an atom, which is all stored in the inner faster-rotating smaller quarks and gluons.

While in the cosmological scale, the black hole, which rotates at light speed and occupies the minimal space of all the cosmic bodies, is the most massive form of the Universe. Then it becomes a quark star called a pulsar, which has a center of strange quarks and a surface of dense neutrons. It rotates also very fast, near the speed of light, and it has an enormous mass.

We do not know what the substance of black holes is, but Einstein called them frozen stars and he said that if we were to obey the laws of the scientific method, they had to have a cut-off substance. Then when he died, we found quarks and so it is obvious that black holes, the densest rotating stars of the Universe, should be made of top quarks, the densest top quarks of the quantum world. Since black holes have very similar properties to those of a quark star or pulsar, ultra dense stars with enormous rotational speed, this fact reinforces the thesis that black holes are top stars.

But this fact, which anyone can understand, is ignored by quantum cosmologists because they don’t believe in Einstein; and of course, those who believe in Einstein are merely interested in the use of the more complex mathematical model of gravitation and mass, in which the principle of equivalence of Newton and Einstein is not so clear. The details of the trees prevent them from seeing the big picture of the forest. But here we are concerned with the picture that tells us that quarks are the atoms of the densest black holes and quark stars because only among the known particles, quarks are that heavy, and only among the known celestial bodies, black holes and quark stars are that heavy.

Further on, because dark matter represents 75% of the universe’s mass, very likely, dark matter is made of black holes, pulsars, and other types of quark stars.

Now when you get into details, the word *vortex* is substituted by *spin*, the word *curved cycle* by non-Euclidean geometry, and you use also two different names for the type of forces displayed by quark vortices (strong forces) and by black holes and pulsars (gravitational forces) because we are talking of two fractal scales of reality, the quantum microscopic world and the cosmological world. But those details that we will explain later in depth, unifying both scales, gravitation, and the quantum world with fractal equations (a long goal of Mr. Einstein, which I found thanks to the expansion of the postulates of non-Euclidean geometry that Mr. Einstein lacked) are of no importance to understand in simple mathematics, the meaning of mass:

*Max. rotational speed × min. radius= quarks and black holes= the densest masses of the cosmos*

*Med. rotational speed × med. radius = electrons and stars*

*0 rotational speed × max. radius = light = 0 mass*

It is in those terms how it becomes easy to understand the different masses of different particles and cosmic bodies, related to their angular momentum or spin: the electron which turns slower in a wider circumference is far lighter than the proton that turns faster in a smaller space, which is lighter than the black hole which turns to the limit of speed of our world.

While the mass of light is zero because the electromagnetic wave never closes in to itself, but once it has made half a circumference downward, it switches upward and so it moves as a transversal, lineal wave without mass and maximal, infinite radius: *0 mass × infinite radius = K.*

In detail, light has an insignificant bit of mass because due to the rotation of galaxies (Mach principle), it has some curvature and it acquires more mass/frequency when it rotates around a quark or black hole vortex, finally evolving into a more complex form, absorbed by an electron, quark, or black hole.

Now it is easy to understand how mass (rotational motion) becomes energy (lineal movement) and vice versa (E=mc2 and M=E/c2). E=mc2 means just that when energy approaches the c-limit of speed of our space-time, as it cannot go faster, it deflects its energy that curls into cyclical motion into mass. This, of course, is another thing CERN pretends to research with the quark cannon. Because using quantum equations and Higgs particles, there is no way to understand how energy becomes mass and vice versa.

The Universe is simple. So a simpler explanation of reality is more truth, even if it is experimentally less refined in its initial conception. For example, Copernicus was simpler than Ptolemy. Further on, for many years, till Kepler and Newton refined its elliptical orbits into ellipses, Copernicus’s cyclical orbits were less accurate than Ptolemaic calculus, but the principles were sounder: The sun was put in the center and that simplified enormously the model.

So it satisfied better Occam’s principle. That is what the principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravity of Newton and Einstein does with masses: by considering that particles are cyclical, accelerated motions, not substances, this sounder principle simplifies all calculus, explains logically how mass attracts like a hurricane of space-time*.*

So to simplify calculus, *given the essential equivalence of the four formulae of Gravitational fields and masses, this* article introduces in a simplified manner, for non-specialists, a new concept of Mass by extending the Principle of Equivalence of Einstein and the metric of the 5th dimension, deducing from it, a Unification Equation of Charges and Masses. It considers also some philosophical and existential deductions of those results, namely the Absolute Relativity of the Universe and the position of man within it.

The Saint Grail of XX c. physics was the search for a Unification Equation of all the forces of Nature. it remained to unify the forces of gravitation and electromagnetism.

‘Mass’ is an intrinsic property of matter, a vortex of gravitational forces, clearly expressed by Einstein’s Principle of equivalence. So it is charge: a vortex of electromagnetic forces.

Under this result, the definition of both, masses and charges as ‘cyclical clocks’ of gravitational and electromagnetic forces of two different scales (the large scale of cosmological gravitation and the small scale of electromagnetic charges) allows an easy conversion of a gravitational and electromagnetic vortex using the simple Metric of the 5th dimension for a tri-dimensional vortex.

The Unification Equation, thus is a trivial mathematical result in 5D Metric, using the simple concept of a fractal Universe structured in different scales of ‘spatial size’ and ‘temporal information’, in which ‘clocks of time’ accelerate, the smaller we become, but the product of both remains, expressed mathematically in its simple formulation by the Metric of the 5th Dimension: Sp x Tƒ = K.

This result allows the ‘first’ ever-theoretical deduction of the value of the G constant of masses, departing from the Q constant of charges. Both mean the same: the degree of space-time curvature produced by an Eddie of masses or charges in those scales of space-time.

It is however impossible to obtain departing from a single space-time continuum as Mr. Einstein or Mr. Hawking tried, by messing the lineal equations of electromagnetism and the cyclical equations of Relativity (what is called quantum gravity).

So we shall deal here with:

- The concept of a charge and a mass as cyclical vortices of space-time of the two-fractal scales of micro-quantum particles and macro-cosmological ones.

With an Appendix on the Higgs claim to give ‘mass’ to other particles.

- The mathematical, simple, trivial deduction with the metric of the 5th Dimension of the equation of Unification of the two fundamental constants of Nature, Q and G.

III. Finally, we shall consider the implications of those facts – the parallelism between ‘atoms’ and ‘galaxies’, which as in the equations of space-time of Einstein-Walker (which treated galaxies as atoms), are ‘similar’ forms of two scales of the Universe

With an appendix on the philosophical consequences of this, according to a strong hypothesis of the Fractal Universe (scales which are mathematically equal in the 5D metric are really equal).

Then in the 5D metric a galaxy is an atom of the higher scale, a proton has the same Schwarzschild radius equation than a black hole, which should therefore be a top quark star, positively charged (as top quarks are ++) and dark matter in the halo is made of negatively charged strangelets, the equivalent to a nebulae of electrons. Which gives a role to the 3 families of quark mass and makes sense of the purpose of stars (future black holes) and planets (future strangelets – perhaps our destiny in the higher scale, if as all seems to indicate, the Fermi Paradox converts all planets into strangelets, as nuclear physicists make them with their experiments with quark matter condensates)…

Nobody has attempted as we did to unify both, charges and masses using the simplest of all its ‘first’ descriptions:

Newton’s gravitational vortices and Bohr’s model of the Hydrogen orbit. Hardcore scholars that take years to learn Einstein’s Metric, quantum field theory and Dirac’s equations consider those 2 models ‘passé’.

And yet, precisely because the principles of unification are simple, it is through the simplest methods where the coincidences happen.

So I could easily unify charges and masses, obtaining the key parameters, the Gravitational constant and the Coulomb constant, and the relationship of hierarchy (10ˆ40), between both forces, by the simple method of translating to gravitational vortex-jargon the jargon of electricity, a somehow convoluted abstraction not so intuitive, and then apply the law of co-invariance of the 5th dimension to both vortices, which immediately showed to be in that 10ˆ40 relationship.

Whereas a charge vortex had clocks of time much faster, and hence turned much faster becoming a much more attractive ‘hurricane of space-time’.

Now, as it happens with gravitation, quantum physics went beyond Bohr’s model and gave us the other ‘3-point of view’. It gave us the static, formal model, of electronic orbitals, the gradient model of energy levels and finally the more sophisticated Hamiltonian analysis of its operators.

And this *final level is the one physicists try by all means to unify. But precisely at that level of detail is where the fractal scales of the Universe which are ‘similar’ but not identical (you are made of space and time and your actions are always the 5 vowels but you do NOT eat light as an electron, or oil as a machine, so you can be unified saying ‘all eats energy’ but not in the specific food).*

Let us consider the first element of that duality, unifying* *masses and charges of gravitation and electromagnetism as vortices of 2 different scales of space-times. Masses and charges are vortices of 2 space-time scales made of 2 relative energetic and informative motions, where gravitation is faster/more extended but carries less information than the slower/less extended world of light and electroweak particles.

The main variation of those vortices of accelerated forces is the one we observe between electronic charges and quark masses, which are the cyclical vortices of those 2 scales of reality, the scale of cosmological vortices of mass and the scale of electroweak vortices of charges.

And so we have to unify those 2 types of cyclical geometries on one side and their lineal, light and gravitational forces, on the other side, as they switch acting either as sinks of space-time (cyclical, non-lineal vortices of increasing acceleration) or as lineal, gravitational or electromagnetic waves in both scales.

Yet since electromagnetism and gravitation are self-similar accelerated vortices of 2 different fractal branes of space-time, the microscopic and cosmologic branes, it follows we should be able to treat them with the same equations of gravitation, either Einstein’s more detailed vortices, defined by the Principle of Equivalence between mass and acceleration or with the classic analysis of Newton, as accelerated vortices with the same geometrical form, whose relative proportion of energy/speed/ distance and information/curvature will be given by 2 different Universal G-Constants.

Thus, we should be able to describe both, the standard Earth-Sun gravitational vortex and Hydrogen, electron-Proton quantum vortex with the same equations, defining them according to the mass of the particles, the rotational speed and 2 different Universal constants, U.C.(i/e):

U(g), the Universal Constant of gravitation that defines a larger/ faster/less curved Gravitational membrane of masses and…

U(q) the Universal constant of charge (Coulomb) that defines a smaller, slower, more curved membrane of quantum light. Since electromagnetism has more information and less energy distance.

Further on, we will be able to prove empirically our hypothesis of 2 self-similar spatial membranes made of light and gravitational quanta, whose only difference is the i/e relative density of information/energy of its cyclical vortices, if the values of the two Universal constants, in those 2 systems (the earth-sun system and the proton-electron system), correspond to their relative empirical value, when we treat them both as mass vortices (being the gravitational constant 10^{39} times weaker than the charge constant).

Let us then go on with the treatment of charges and masses as Newtonian vortices of space-time. In Newton’s equations a mass can be considered a cyclic, accelerated vortex of gravitational space-time defined in classic Newton Mechanics by a centripetal, gravitational acceleration: *ω ^{2}r*.

The same treatment can be done with Poison equations or Relativity equations, which are a static, present, simultaneous picture of Newton’s space-time vortex of acceleration, where G expresses the informative curvature of the space.

Thus if gravitational acceleration is *ω ^{2}r*, then

*F=mg=mω*, and we arrive at

^{2}r= GmM/r^{2}*G=ω*. Where

^{2}r^{3}/M*r*is in meters and

*ω*is angular acceleration in radians per second. So passing the active magnitude of time (mass, or charge or any form of time clock to the left) we obtain a general equation for all physical time vortices of all scales, which will be the template for the Unification of all vortices, in different ‘degrees of mathematical complexity’.

This written as an identity Sp x T ƒ = Sp x Tƒ observed with different parameters writes:

*Γ. Active Magnitude (space-quanta) M x Curvature-speed of the clock (time frequency) G = volume of space r³ x time acceleration w²*

This opens an entire new field of physics, not quantum gravity, the description of cosmology with quantum laws, which is proved false, but fractal relativity, the description of the quantum world as a self-similar membrane to that of the cosmological world.

*Unification Equation: *

Where we obtain for 2 UC(i/e) values, G and Q, 2 different space/time scales and vortices acceleration (mass and charges).

This written in classic mathematical physics, where we consider, using Newton’s notation, a mass a three-dimensional, cyclical accelerated vortex of space-time defined in classic Newton mechanics by a centripetal acceleration, which gives us the classic definition of the universal constant *G (UC), writes* as:

* UC x M=ω ^{2}r^{3}*

where *r* is in meters and ω is the angular acceleration in radians per second of any gravitational orbit.

This simple Newtonian equation, however, in the fractal paradigm, should apply *to any scale of the Universe, able to describe any vortex of space-time by merely changing the value of the universal constant UC (G), but that of the Universal Constant of any other scale. In the case of the microcosmic scale of electromagnetism, the Universal Constant of charge (Ke). Thus, we obtain the fractal equation of any vortex of time:*

Universal constant of a space-time vortex, U (g, k) = w (angular speed)^{2} × radius^{3}/ mass

If this is truth and the Universe is indeed a fractal of several scales, it means that the previous equation will be able to describe *both*, not only a gravitational vortex of space-time in the cosmological scale with the universal constant G, but *also a charge as a quantum vortex of space-time with the universal constant k, the constant of Coulomb.*

Let us then substitute the parameters for the values of the sun (mass) minus earth (rotational speed and radius) to get G. The approximate values are as follows:

Sun mass = 2 × 10^{30} kg; Earth’s angular velocity 2 × 10^{-7 }rad. per sec.

Earth’s orbit = 150 million kms.

Result: G=6.67 × 10 ^{-11} kg-1 m^{3} rad. sec.^{-2}

This is standard gravitational theory. What has never been done, because the fractal paradigm was not known till recently, is to substitute in the same equation of gravitational cosmological masses the mass radius and speed of the space-time vortex by the values of the fundamental quantum space-time vortex, a hydrogen atom/charge.

If the thesis of a fractal universe made of hierarchical scales is truth, then those values should give us the value of the universal constant of charges, the Coulomb constant.

Indeed, if we substitute for the proton (mass) and the Bohr electronic orbital (speed and radius)

4 × 10^{16 }rad. sec.^{ -1 }= w (electron);

5.3 × 10^{-11 }m. (Bohr radius);

proton mass = 1.6 × 10 ^{-27} kg.

Then we get a G, which is 2×10^{39 }stronger than the gravitational radius; thus, the hydrogen atom behaves as a self-similar fractal scale in the quantum world to a solar system.

And then you can get also the electron radius expressed in the jargon of a quantum gravitational world using the translated ‘Gravitational Coulomb constant’: *G(k)M/c ^{2}*.

But since in that expression *M* is the mass of a proton, G(k), the electromagnetic constant as a gravitational constant, and c, the speed of light, that expression is exactly the *Schwarzschild radius of a quantum black hole.*

*Thus, the electron Bohr radius, which is the final radius of minimal size and energy in electrons, is the event horizon of a black hole in the quantum gravitational world*.

To notice those results, the *first theoretical deduction* of Ke departing from G and the enormous simplification of the parameters of the electron radius till arriving to the same expression that a black hole radius cannot be by chance. They are mathematical deductions, one of the three *standard forms of proof in science.*

Yet a theoretical calculus of those values cannot be exact ‘by chance’, unless the theoretical model behind it – the fractal sel-similar structure as Sp x Tƒ entities of all physical systems is right.

Thus, the previous calculus is a clear proof that both, charges and masses, are unified as values of the same type of space-time vortices in the 2 different scales of space-time of the Universe. And they are geometrically unified from the p.o.v. of geometrical relativity not from quantum theory, as Einstein wanted it.

Thus, the Unification equation in terms of Newtonian mechanics is simple:

2 obvious, simple proofs of that dual, scalar structure:

– Planck’s minimal value for Mass is far bigger (10^{-7} g.) than the minimal value for an electromagnetic action (h), which seems to mean that the mass scale is far bigger than the quantum world.

– The entire standard model works without gravitational forces. Thus we have to postulate that particles are not ‘mass-particles’ but electromagnetic systems, which become elements of mass only when they aggregate in huge numbers, as it happens with electromagnetic photons, which become electrons of the upper scale in huge nebulae.

But we see masses as static forms. This is due to the Galilean paradox: a space-time vortex-mass becomes then statically a space-time distortion, a deformation of space-time, which increases as we decrease size. Since the *deformation of space-time is the same for any cycle. Hence, when we trace a smaller cycle the deformation increases.* And so it does the mass and the U(w), now a static constant of deformation.

This is the interpretation most often assumed of G in Einstein’s Relativity. In a simpler, classic approximation based in fluid dynamics, M/r^{3} becomes the density of space/time and its inverse, R^{3}/m, the displacement of space-time provoked by a given mass. It is then evident by Archimedes Principle that a bigger mass density will provoke a bigger displacement and distortion of space-time an inversely a bigger acceleration towards the central vortex. And since the density of a proton is much higher than the density of a planet, the Universal Constant for an atom is much higher and so it is its angular speed. Does the electromagnetic constant, or static curvature of an atomic system, is much stronger. So it is the density of a proton mass.

This reformulation of electromagnetism simplifies and clarifies the meaning of physics. Yet to grasp the relationships between the quantum world and the cosmos we have to transform, using the new coulomb constant, C=1.5×10^{29}, electromagnetic parameters to the jargon of gravity, departing from its fundamental relationship:

*F=UCC Mm/r ^{2} = e^{2}/4π e_{o}r^{2}*

Then we can translate the main constants of electromagnetism (Rydberg constant, α constant, which denotes the strength of the electromagnetic field, etc.) to the gravitational jargon and again the results obtained are close to the theoretical value.

So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric force at different scales, *explained with 2 different historic jargons*. Further on, as we ‘transform’ the concepts of electromagnetic vortices to gravitational, geometric symbols, the main discoveries of Relativity apply to electromagnetic vortices.

Perhaps the most interesting simplified value under the new U(q) charge constant is the Proton radius that appears with the same formula than a black hole, Schwarzschild horizon.

This means that a quark particle (a hadron, a proton, etc.) is basically a black hole of the quantum, gravitational scale and vice versa: a cosmological black hole might be a deconfined state of billions of ultra-dense quarks. In such fractal Universe, each small particle could from the perspective of a small observer a macrocosmic form. And each atom could be a galaxy. Such fractal Universe validates the Theory of Great Numbers, which are the parameters of self-repetition of the Universe, which might be from a lower perspective a mere atom or black hole of a hyper-Universe.

Now the EXTENSION of the model of electromagnetism, translating its equations to vortex equations of accelerated time is huge.

It means the foundation of the subject with the new physics of 5D time vortices; and makes sense of every part of electromagnetism, a cultural jargon, far more convoluted due to the lack of a precise understanding of it, in the times of Faraday, Franklin et al (for example all physicists do know about the – sign of electrons, an error as electrons are the + absorbing vortices, dominant in the electromagnetic scales NOT protons, which are the quark, dominant in the strong force and its symmetric gravitational informative inner galactic force). And all of them know that the only difference between G and Q is the 1/4e factor which was absorbed in G when Kepler->Newton developed their formulae.

One of the most fascinating results of the understanding of the 5th dimension of space-time, the dimension of fractal scales of space and different speeds of time clocks, is the enormous simplification it implies in our understanding of the fundamental concepts of the Universe, from the meaning of mass and energy, information and time to the solution of the equations yet not solved in classic physics.

In that regard, this new r=evolution of science must be understood as the simplification experimented by astronomy with the arrival of Copernicus which put in the center of the Universe the sun. He was first dismissed precisely for the simplicity of his discovery that made so easy to calculate the orbits of planets. The astronomers of the age found it so simple that they dismissed it. And yet as Einstein put it ‘God is simple and not malicious’. Again when Einstein introduced his most famous formulae, E=mc ², and then his special relativity, he was criticized for the simplicity of the mathematics required to reach those conclusions and Hilbert said it was so easy that a high school could find it.

Tƒ, Sp and Tƒ, Sp are similar concepts. If the reader observes i includes o and æ, a and e, a is in that sense expansive expulsion of energy taken in a larger conceptualization, o and a are the pure energy and form, emitted or absorbed with minimal interference of the being, e and I are the two more elaborated versions which approach to reach and e=I point in which the transformation ends and the being finds an equal connection that I and e are the same, and this realization starts the wave of present, puts in motion the system that finds a cyclical meaning to its communication of two poles and start to move with the purpose of growing and reproduction, Œ

Those masses and charges, prove that the Universe is much more than the physical definition. And we do still have to study the concept of the source, which we shall say now is the Tƒ closed element because once a cycle is closed it finds its purpose in repeating its path (law of the least action). And so it gives purpose to its motion.

Closed motions become perceptive motions of its synchronicity with pat actions it is repeating and finding through its memorial logic volume of still time=information, it is itself.

So fractal physics defines *all particles as accelerated vortices of time of different scales of the fifth dimension; with a general formula which properly ‘twisted’ relates all particles, masses, and forces from the strong through the electromagnetic and gravitational scale – but NOT the electroweak force, which is a trans-form-ative force of time, NOT of space:*

*U.C. (G,C) = ω ^{2}r^{3}/M(U.C.-G,C) x M*=

*ω*

^{2}r^{3}M= ω^{2}r^{3}/U.C.(G,C)What about the other 2 forces? The similarity between the strong force and the gravitational force ‘inside the atom-galaxy’, both attractive ‘only’ and the outer force of the galaxy (repulsive gravitation aka dark energy) and the outer force of the atom (electromagnetic repulsive expansive forces) is then immediate on the ‘simpler models’, as it is the parallelism between magnetism and gravitomagnetism (Heaviside’s discovery). And many other results follow.

Further on, the hierarchy between those forces is also immediate *and follows the general concept of scales of the fifth dimension, which are more in-form-ative, ‘attractive’, curved, accelerated, with faster time clocks moving into the future (all self-similar concepts) as we shrink in spatial size, Spe*

Let us study mathematically this question by comparing those two limits of charges and masses beyond which human perception, becomes faulty.

**Scales are similar NOT equal.**

It is important to notice though that the Universe of 5D planes is fractal, ruled by the 3rd postulate of ¬Æ, of similarity not equality, as fractals are not equal in scales, but similar with internal parts that might differ even if the outside form of the point seems equal to an external observer.

Thus self-similarity is not equality, an atom is self-similar to a galaxy but NOT likely a galaxy – reason why for example quantum cosmology, which models galaxies as atoms (albeit without the conceptual 5D understanding) does not give us exact results.

Quantum cosmologists consider by using exactly the same equations (in their ad hoc method with no conceptual reasoning) ‘identical’ the scales of the cosmos and the quantum world, so they use quantum equations for all. This is a hyperbolic error. We have equations for each scale and what we can show, as we did here, is the self-similarities of scales.

All in all, it is evident that what we call a black hole or pulsar is made of quark quanta; it is a fractal of quarks. Thus we can apply to its vortices the laws of Newtonian fluids or the more complex equations of a Non-Euclidean vortices of space-time, as we do with any other ‘medium’ called a ‘phase space’ in physics. They can be considered akin to a hurricane, which is a ‘medium’ of air molecules, or to a tornado, which is a medium of water molecules. All those mediums have limits of speed, which are the same for their lineal forces and cyclical vortices:

Light space-time has a c-speed limit, which is also the limit of speed of a rotational electron vortex and a 0 K limit.

Dark energy and quark matter belonging to the gravitational membrane seems to have a c<10 c lineal and rotational speeds.

Because each space-time membrane has vortices of information and energetic, lineal forces, we need equations of self-similarity, relating informative vortices of charges and masses on one side and gravitational and electromagnetic waves on the other. This is done with gravito-magnetism, which relates cosmic gravitational, lineal waves and electro-magnetic fields. So, the gravito-magnetic formalism just needs to be properly fit within the wider concept of 2 self-similar fractal space-times, to define in self-similar terms, light waves and dark-energy waves of gravitation; as the elementary, actions-units of the 2 fractal scales.

Needless to say if a proton is a black hole of the inferior scale, a black hole is a quark condensate. And measures give us black holes as ‘top quark condensates’.

Needless to say, the philosophical conundrum of the self-similarity of forces and forms on both scales cannot be solved experimentally. If the Universe is self-similar between those 2 scales, but those are the limits of scales of reality, there is nothing below the atom or over the galaxy. If the Universe is infinite in its scales we are nothing to the whole. And yet while the first answer pleases our ‘anthropocentric world view’, the second answer is far more logical and in accordance with the evolution of science and thought.

It would then mean that the Universe is absolutely relative. That is, reality is not only as General Relativity proved, relative in all its motions, which depending on the observer might be seen as motion or as stillness (so Galileo found the Earth moves but we see it still), but it would be also absolutely relative in scales.

Which form together the 5th dimension of the Universe. This fifth dimension in which science has worked since the first telescopes and microscopes opened it to our eyes, however has not been understood in logic terms at all beyond the beginning represented by Einstein, on my view by a lack of philosophical and logical depth in the work of physicist*s. *

We deal here, when talking of the fifth dimension with a concept that should have been obvious: if physics study in general relativity time as space, in a present slice, the total time includes a flow from past to future, and from the microcosms to the future evolution of more complex structures, from smaller to bigger scales – and those dimensions, the past, already evolved flows of time that created scales from the micro-quantum world to the macro-gravitational world, are the 5th and 6th dimension which physics does not study but must be understood to evolve science.

General relativity studies the ‘present, continuum space-time’ (hence spatializes time to gain precision in the measure by creating a simultaneous frame of reference). And Absolute relativity is the next step expanding the study of time with both, logic and geometric, topological, mathematical non-Euclidean tools.

I recall the only time I could give a conference on that unification at Sonoma’s 50 anniversary of Systems Sciences, in which many top physicists were present.

They were first in awe that such simple equations as a 3 dimensional vortex could unify and extract the never found theoretical result of G and Q (we have only empirical measures), solve the hierarchy problem and further on as I develop a bit more the gravitational ‘jargon’ of charges, prove that the Proton radius was equal to the black hole radius so an atom was self-similar to a galaxy and the scales of the Universe were infinite through the 5th dimension.

Then someone raised his hand and told me what Hilbert told to Einstein when we published special relativity: the mathematics is too simple (Hilbert quipped that they were at the level of an undergraduate), and the enthusiasm waned. Within months NY Times published in its Sunday magazine a cover with my suit to the Nuclear Industry and that killed my career with ad hominem so I loss all my scholar positions and never gave more master conferences…

But that is another story of the limits of ethics in science. What matters here is to realize of the multiplicity aroused by the 4 pillars of all descriptions of reality. And the Occam’s razor: simpler is better.

**The strong principle of equivalence: mass as a vortex of gravitational time.**

Mass is the attractive, in/forming force of the Universe; and it is merely the last, accelerated, curved motion of the gravitational force. Einstein explained this with his principle of equivalence between acceleration and mass/gravitation. Initially, due to the ‘mirage’ of materialism, physicists thought the principle only applied to the external, curving vortex of gravitational forces that sunk into the mass. But the mass as a solid substance was never found and all pictures have seen merely vortices of curved motions.

Now we can explain all this and take further, conceptually and mathematically the discoveries of Einstein, thanks to the advances of complexity. In this post we shall deal at the simplest possible level with empirical, theoretical and mathematical demonstrations of those concepts, considering some of the new advances on theory of information and astro-physics, we are making departing from Einstein’s insight.

*
***Einstein’s mass theory **

*I*n Physics, according to Einstein the information of a particle is its mass. This can be easily proved theoretically, mathematically and empirically.

In the previous pictures there is an obvious empirical proof. All pictures of masses and charges appear as vortices with an accelerated inward motion. Let us now deal with the other proofs (and let us remember that truth in epistemology of science is based in 3 pillars – empirical, logical and mathematical proofs.

*Einstein’s Conceptual proof.*

Now this simple equation is in accordance with Einstein’s Principle of equivalence between acceleration and gravitational force. Both are *the same in General Relativity.* And so why we should stop this ‘comparison’ at a certain point of the accelerating vortex? Since in the Universe we have never seen ‘substance’ but only motions, it is logic to think that what we call a mass is exactly that: the final region of acceleration into a vortex of gravitational forces. Such vortex obviously offers a resistance to motion (inertial mass), which is dependent of the speed/acceleration of such motion.

Einstein’s Mathematical proof

The mathematical proof is simple, given by the 2 main equations of Einstein, which relate the frequency of information (a time parameter), the mass and the energy of physical systems:

ExT=K, E=Mc^{2}, hence M=K/T=Kv; where v is the frequency of rotation of the vortex of mass.

Thus a mass is a vortex of space-time that carries the information of the Universe in its frequency.

This also has empirical proofs: All vortices attract inwards with a force equivalent to the strength of the rotating vortex. So a hurricane attracts more when it turns faster. And so a mass, which is a hurricane of space-time attracts more the faster it turns. Moreover vortices of all kind are ‘accelerating’ inwards: Vo x Ro = K, which means that the shorter the radius is, Ro, the faster its speed, Vo, so the closer you come to the vortex, the faster it turns, the more it attracts, the stronger its gravitational force is, and the more mass it has.

*B*ut what type of accelerated motion? Well it turns out that there are only two accelerated motions, lineal and cyclical accelerations. Further on, accelerated motions can produce forces that ‘work’. And Newton gave us a simple equation to describe ‘all’ the forces of the Universe: F = M (cyclical acceleration) x A (lineal acceleration). This is fascinating because it means that the Universe is made of 2 accelerated motions: F = M x A, where A is lineal acceleration or ‘energy’ and Mass is a vortex with more dimensional form, or cyclical acceleration, whose form and frequency carry the in-form-ation of the Universe.

Of course when we enter into deeper analysis of the mathematical details, a mass vortex is more complex. Einstein described it with a set of equations that go beyond the scope of this introduction. But there is a different version of those equations much simpler – the gravito-magnetic version, recently proved experimentally by a Probe, which are mimetic from the equations of electromagnetism.

And so since charges are obvious accelerated vortices of electromagnetic forces, it is self-evident that if masses produce a self-similar field system, they will be accelerated vortices of gravitational forces.

As Einstein put it ‘the Universe is simple and not malicious’. And so there you have, the 3 simplest, more important equations of Physics, F=m a, E=Mc2, E=hv and then the more complex, equally essential Maxwell and Einstein’s equations come all together to accept mass as an *‘internal’ property that define mass and hence need no further fields and esoteric particles to be explained.*

**Some extra-ordinary solutions obtained with Mr. Einstein’s Principle of Strong Equivalence.**

We must then make first a philosophical reflection against naive realism: those are mental measures by the mind of man who ‘creates’ our bidimensional visual view of reality and as such we cannot make ‘why-physics’ without endophysics, discussions about how mind’s geometries construct systems.

Look at the right side, the 3 most important equations of the Universe those of energy, in the 3 scales, the quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational scales.

They are ALL cases of 5D metric as the unification equation and so the question here since Energy is present is to define the two other parameters as parameters of entropy and form in the three main scales.

Let us then consider some basic conceptual analysis of those equations. If we compare e=hv and e=mc², the two limiting equations we obtain:

*m=v (h/c²)*

A key equation of GST physics as it shows mass to be the frequency of the enclosing membrane of a larger scale, as v is on the quantum scale. Yet the constant that relates both, is *Lovacevski’s expression of the relative curvature of the human mind-view, (tƒ/Sp ≈ h/c²). That is we are converting ‘mentally’ a world into the other, with new parameters, and a new mind view, that of the human being, which transforms the much faster frequencies of the time clocks of the quantum world, through the lobachevski’s constant that amounts to a parallel transformation of the mind view from the one a quantum atom might have to the far less curved slower mind view of the human being.*

So we return to objective science and bring different perspectives to explain basic physical phenomena, and the simpler answers unlike the Germanic view are considered the more harmonic and larger truth: such as why certain particles like a black hole have more mass, while others like a photon have no mass?

It is really because particles are ‘prescient’ and foresee the arrival of a celebrity (they are also conscious) coming to it, distinguishing them? Or something more objective, physical and normal; as the Higgs interpretation for common consume would believe? Not, obvious. The Answer is because its vortex of time is faster.

Of course something more normal when we describe a mass as an accelerated vortex, whose frequency of rotation gives us like in a hurricane its speed and strength and attractive power. Then all the questions still unknown about mass and energy become solved:

– First, why and how energy becomes mass in that equation, E=Mc2. This is simple Energy is lineal acceleration, mass is cyclical acceleration, thus a mere topological change of the form of motion transforms one into the other. The Universe is eternal, made of motions. And so one becomes the other in the c-limit speed of our space-time membrane.

– Then why antiparticles have inverse time coordinates? Self-evident: they are time vortex that turns clock wards.

– Then, why black holes attract so much being so small? Obvious. The event horizon is the c-limit of speed that curves light into mass. So they turn at c-speed, and they are very small. Thus the frequency of its mass-cycle that is proportional to its speed and inverse to its length is the maximal possible in the Universe.

– So why light has no mass? A tautology: Light does not close a cycle, but it is a wave that deflects the cycle into an open wave. Hence it never has mass. But if we were to calculate its mass in terms of energy the higher the frequency of the web (analogous to the mass frequency) the more mass-energy it has.

– Then there is the scalar, fractal structure derived of the homology of the equations of charges and masses, which however exist in two different scales. This is a key discovery for the fractal structure of the Universe and proves one of my fundamental mathematical findings:__ __the unification equation of the G and Ke Universal constants of charges and masses as two vortices of two fractal discontinuous scales of space-time, the quantum, smaller world and cosmic upper scale.

And we will return to that at the end of this article, when considering in depth the consequences of upholding and evolving Einstein’s theory of mass, instead of seeking and absurd scalar particle that explains so little…

– Finally, why the Universe accelerates between galaxies? It is accelerating and will end into pure entropy? No. Self-evident. Physicists ignore the meaning of information and mass and they have a continuous theory of space. None of that works anymore. As each time cycle ‘breaks’ space into an inner and outer region. So do the time cycles of the Universe of which the biggest clock is a galaxy that ‘warps space into time-mass’. So the acceleration of space between galaxies is balanced by its warping within them.

And both balance each other: gravitation informs light-space into mass vortices, galaxies. And then light-space the substance of which our space is made, once it abandons the galaxy, stretches his frequency (Doppler effect as ‘real’) till its ‘generational time cycle’ of around 10 up to 10 years dissolves it back into non-perceivable, lineal, gravitation with no form. But this and so many other fascinating results of a proper theory of time cycles require more knowledge of physics that I expect a non-physicists to have, so we shall end here the simpler version of Einstein’s mass theory.

**5D Unification from the perspective of electromagnetism: Heaviside equations.**

Following with the concept of an atom-galaxy, albeit slightly different, as all fractal scales have slightly different laws, we come to the opposite view: to describe gravitation with the equations of electromagnetism.

We notice in the graphs of a hydrogen atom and the galaxy, which in Einstein-Walker model of the Universe was in fact modeled as a hydrogen atom, one of the most fascinating proofs of the fractal structure of the Universe in infinite self-similar scales of lineal forces of ‘spatial energy’ and cyclical particles of ‘informative time’ are the recently found ”excited S-orbitals’ of the galaxy: two bubbles of electromagnetic energy, with exactly the same form that the S orbitals of an atom have in its excited states. This fascinating image, beyond a discussion about galaxies as atoms in an infinite eternal fractal Universe, responds to two of the new ‘invariances’ of absolute relativity.

If Einstein showed that all systems are invariant to motions and rotations in space, Absolute relativity adds the invariance of scale (so gravitational and quantum scales are self-similar in properties) and the invariance of form (so its topologies are also the same).

So what the previous image shows is the self-similarity of the quantum, electro-magnetic and cosmological, gravitational membranes of space-time. They are the 2 main fractal scales of space-time of the Universe. In this post on the future of science we introduce the mathematical equation that unifies the constants of both forces, G and Q, complementary to the Gravito-magnetic equations recently proved by Probe A, which express Einstein’s field equations in a format self-similar to that of electromagnetic forces.

According to general relativity, the gravitational field produced by a rotating object (or any rotating mass–energy) can, in a particular limiting case, be described by equations that have the same form as in classical electromagnetism. Starting from the basic equation of general relativity, the Einstein field equation, and assuming a weak gravitational field or reasonably flat space-time, the gravitational analogs to Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetism, called the “GEM equations”, can be derived. GEM equations compared to Maxwell’s equations in SI units are:

**In the graph Gravito electromagnetism**, abbreviated **GEM**, refers to a set of formal analogies between the equations for electromagnetism and relativistic gravitation; specifically: between Maxwell’s field equations and an approximation, valid under certain conditions, to the Einstein field equations for general relativity. The most common version of GEM is valid only far from isolated sources, and for slowly moving test particles.

The analogy and equations were first published in 1893, before general relativity, by Oliver Heaviside as a separate theory expanding Newton’s law, differing essentially only by some small factors.

**Lorentz force**

For a test particle whose mass *m* is “small”, in a stationary system, the net (Lorentz) force acting on it due to a GEM field is described by the GEM analog to the Lorentz force equation. Where:

*m*is the mass of the test particle;*q*is the electric charge of the test particle;**v**is the velocity of the test particle.

The acceleration of any inertial test particle is simply the same (above graph), changing the ‘names’ of the lineal and cyclical motions.

The discrepancy in the factors arises because the source of the gravitational field is the second order stress–energy tensor, as opposed to the source of the electromagnetic field being the first order four-current tensor. This difference becomes clearer when one compares non-invariance of relativistic mass to electric charge invariance. This can be traced back to the spin-2 character of the gravitational field, in contrast to the electromagnetism being a spin-1 field.

We shall see along these articles specially on the 4th line the enormous importance that the concept of spin has for the structure of the Universe; as it is the minimal unit of information and perception of reality. And the first step in the construction of all forms of information, perception and reproduction of reality, and the emergence of new forms of ‘social organization’ that ultimately emerge as new planes of existence of physical systems.

**In Planck units**

From comparison of GEM equations and Maxwell’s equations it is obvious that −1/(4π *G*) is the gravitational analog of vacuum permittivity, *ε*_{0}. Adopting Planck units normalizes *G*, *c* and 1/(4π *ε*_{0}) to 1, thereby eliminating these constants from both sets of equations. The two sets of equations then become identical but for the minus sign preceding 4π in the GEM equations.

These minus signs stem from an essential difference between gravity and electromagnetism: electrostatic charges of identical sign repel each other, while masses attract each other.

Hence the GEM equations are simply Maxwell’s equations with mass (or mass density) substituting for charge (or charge density), and −*G* replacing the Coulomb force constant 1/(4π *ε*_{0}).

The following table summarizes the results thus far:

4π appears in both the GEM and Maxwell equations, because Planck units normalize *G* and 1/(4π*ε*_{0}) to 1, and not 4π*G* and 1/*ε*_{0}.

In the graph, we can see the main difference between the gravito-magnetic field and the electromagnetic-field, which in terms of ‘spin orientation’, could be resumed in the concept that gravito-magnetism is the ‘anti-particle’ of electromagnetism as both are inverted in the direction of the angular momentum and the magnetic field.

Now it is important to observe a fundamental law of 5 D Physics: between planes of the 5th dimension

Yet since spin and magnetism are also inverted (left handed/right handed), the series of ‘growing cyclical vortices’ which ‘feed into each other’ as they emerge into larger configurations, as in the case of lineal momentum, in which each new ‘flow of lineal motion’ has the inverse direction of the previous ones (so the couple of neutrinos that give birth to photons in the neutrino theory of light, have longitudinal polarization, and the photon, transversal polarization, going in opposite directions, and then the electron, which feeds on electromagnetic fields have inverse direction and the electric current that is born of the electron displacement is also inverse in direction).

All in all physical systems in their directions of emergence as social wholes sustained by the energy and form of the lower scale follow a FUNDAMENTAL law of 5D metric:

|∆-1 ∧ O∆ ∧ | ∆+1

Which means that as we grow in scale the functions and forms of the points become inverted.

This approximate reformulation of gravitation as described by general relativity in the weak field limit makes an apparent field appear in a frame of reference different from that of a freely moving inertial body. This apparent field may be described by two components that act respectively like the electric and magnetic fields of electromagnetism, and by analogy these are called the *gravito-electric* and *Gravitomagnetic* fields, since these arise in the same way around a mass that a moving electric charge is the source of electric and magnetic fields.

The main consequence of the *Gravitomagnetic* field, or velocity-dependent acceleration, is that a moving object near a rotating massive object will experience acceleration not predicted by a purely Newtonian (gravitoelectric) gravity field. More subtle predictions, such as induced rotation of a falling object and precession of a spinning object are among the last basic predictions of general relativity to be directly tested.

Indirect validations of gravitomagnetic effects have been derived from analyses of relativistic jets.

Roger Penrose had proposed a frame dragging mechanism for extracting energy and momentum from rotating black holes. Relativistic jets can serve as the largest and brightest form of validations for gravitomagnetism.

Some higher-order gravitomagnetic effects can reproduce effects reminiscent of the interactions of more conventional polarized charges. For instance, if two wheels are spun on a common axis, the mutual gravitational attraction between the two wheels will be greater if they spin in opposite directions than in the same direction. This can be expressed as an attractive or repulsive gravitomagnetic component.

The parallelism between the equations of electromagnetism and Gravitation were discovered by that forgotten Genius, Heaviside, *even before Einstein discovered his. Then it was found that Heaviside and Einstein’s equation were self-similar in a gravitational field on flat space-time, which is more or less all the space-time of the Universe except the ‘peaks’ of height that black holes form.*

Recently Probe B proved that gravito-magnetism (the equivalent to magnetism in the gravitational cosmological scale) exists. So the equations were right. And yet, this ‘new generation’ of mechanical physicists keep ignoring the implications of this and many self-similar discoveries that back Heaviside vision and the fractal nature of the Universe.

Let us then take further their work using that self-similarity to its ultimate consequences, considering the Q-constant just self-similar to the gravitational constant and finding what are the parallel particles of both scales.

Physical Reality is made of dual energetic/informative states (complementarity principle particle-wave): Cyclic vortices/ particles develop lineal actions-waves in 2 scales, the microscopic quantum world of Electromagnetism and the macroscopic, gravitational world. Once the duality of scales and forms is understood, we unify the constants of dimensional proportionality of both types of vortices and forces, studying transversal waves of ‘lineal speed’ in both scales of the fractal universe: the c-speed of small electromagnetic waves, and we contend, the superluminal ‘action at distance’ of gravitational waves.

For a century, quantum cosmology has tried to obtain this unification, departing from quantum laws. Yet it can be obtained, departing from the gravitational equations of a vortex of space-time. Coulomb already hints at this fact when he decided to use a self-similar formula to that of Newton to describe a charge. What Einstein did was to refine those measures with the concept of simultaneous, present time and the use of the non-Euclidean Ricci tensor/flow, which is a more sophisticated, detailed picture of that curved vortex of space-time.

He, we might say, applied a mathematical method that allows to take a series of still photographs of the vortex with enormous accuracy, but the complexity of his calculus hid the unification equation for a century. So it is evident that we are observing the same geometric vortex at different scales, explained with two different historic jargons.

So indeed, the Universe is a fractal of space-time, with two self-similar membranes.

Yet the ternary method and the multiplicity of povs implies each part can then be studied as a combination of the three elements. So for example the membrane seems still as a fixed membrane from a whole perspective; even if it rotates faster than any part due to its angular momentum (so you see fast moving wheels as fixed forms). While the central singularity that is the ‘eye of the hurricane, the black hole of the galaxy, the mind-ego that sees still, the focus of a crystal that ‘stops’ briefly light into an image and so on); even if we call it ab.

Tiƒ is the *point where motion become still form, a stiff mind, which kills motion into pure form and then explodes it back into entropy. So in mystical terms it is the point of death of the flow of micro points that come into the singularity to stop its time (literally in physical equations your time becomes zero in a black hole horizon), and then creates its maximal motion o x ∞ = K to compensate).*

So all vortices have axis of flows expelled from the singularity that ‘sees’ > focuses > perceives> stops> explodes and ejects:

*In the graph, the limits between scales, which for our galactic scale is 0 T informative order and c-speed*

In the graphs, organism of the galaxy, where the black hole singularity at 0 temperature of perfect order and the c-speed of reproduction of information are the essential limiting elements of the open ball of stars within which light space-time beings as we are exist. All systems are modelled with the same concept as singularities and membranes which cannot be reached by the herded inner group of the system; in this case the ‘mitochondrial’ stars that ‘feed’ the reproduction of black holes, the DNA of the galaxy and likely strange matter, which forms the ‘protein halo’.

Mathematically thee concept is a non-Euclidean point as portrayed by Klein (right graph), where the limits of motion and density prevent the body to escape, because it never reaches o, the membrane, while all paths are ‘non-orientable in the interior’ of the system, a topological concept that means if you exist in the interior you always end up guided by networks in physical organisms, potentials in physical systems, laws in social systems, crossing the singularity; arriving to the heart, being connected to the nervous system, obeying the law or become jailed in social ystems – the ‘FUNCTIONAL-FORMAL’ space-time barriers, limits that enslave the vital space of the being to the combined action of the membrane and singularity.

In the graph almost all physical systems can be described with the external circulatory closed membrane which encircles a vital space, self-centred in a Tƒi singularity of information or mind-point-particle of the system.

Again, in our society obsessed with mechanisms, hence revering any word uttered by Physicists, hardly any scientist ‘dares’ to express the fact that lineal time and locomotion are ‘modes of changes’ of pure entropy-mechanical simplex systems, but in complexity and biology and history, all related to changes NOT in the entropy/energy of the being but in its information/social evolution, nothing can be explained without the 2 arrows of time.

YOU LIVE IN A BIOLOGICAL PLANET, which is ROTATING in cycles, EVOLVING towards more information, both in life and technology INSIDE a galaxy, which is also made of r=evolving matter, TOWARDS a central black hole, knot of the gravitational, in-form-ative force… WHICH physicsts disregard in their ‘big-bang’ models of an entropic Universe, where they ONLY count the ‘expansion of entropic space’ between Galaxies, the entropy-death of expansive electromagnetic forces. Again we repeat, ‘the worship of mechanisms’ has brought the worship of ‘physicists’ simplified models of time.

So due to such reductionist error humans lost the understanding of the main feature of Nature, made of cyclical time clocks, which carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and dimensional form of its cycles. Also in mathematical physics, even if the conceptual expression of it is blurred.

While the present=conserved=repetitive momenta of physical and biological beings was merely stated as an unrelated principle, extended to the whole observation of the worldcycle as zero sums (conservative energy cycles).

So the unity and relationship of those three arrows (entropic past, present momenta and future information); its zero sum worldcycles of energy and the way those cycles homologic in all species defined world-death cycles were ignored. Here we shall show that unity of reality and its ternary structure in space, time… and ∆-scales of nature from smaller through biological into astrophysical systems. In that sense, we shall equate momenta, product of entropic motion and cyclical vortices of time, aka masses and charges, with top predator momenta, the product of the body force and mind information of the biological being, which is what evolution selects. Present=repetition=reproduction=conserved forms in motions, eternally becoming and disappearing to become again; this is the reproductive game of the fractal Universe, we all play.

As we have just analysed the dominant arrow of information of all beings, manifested in its life-death world cycle, let us then make a fast review of the two other main arrows all system possess, and manifest in its actions: reproductive present motions and lineal entropic locomotions under the new paradigm of ¬Æ πime§paœ.

**Physical systems. The ratios of absolute scale: density, speed. **

In the previous graph we see the three scales of physical systems, the quantum, thermodynamic and mechanical, gravitational scales. WE MUST understand that the scalar Universe implies an absolute relativity principle: we are not concerned with single parameters but with ratios between the ∆ST elements of the Universe. Thus instead of length, mass and time, (and its opposite frequency, 1/t), we are more concerned with s/t ratios of speed, t/s ratios of density and the measure of time with frequency ages and space with quanta. Then we can easily translate mathematical physics and enlighten many questions of it, as we shall do in the parts dedicated to astrophysical sciences.

In the graph, physical systems as ratio systems of density and speed in several scales of reality shows in a dynamic way the interplay of all the elements of ∆ust of space-time.

**Operandi**

What are then the operandi of the fifth dimension?

Obviously *if in a single scale, the fundamental equations are those of *the superposition of parallel present waves, such as entropy ± information = Present; or the similar pythagorean that deals with relative bidimensional perpendicular elements superposed such as, a²+b²=c²; in multiple scales we need ‘larger operandi’ to count, the ‘innumerable’ parts of the being.

And for that reason we do have two fundamental self-similar operand for the fifth dimension: multiplication, its potentiation and integral/derivative calculus. Let us only consider the conceptual meaning of multiplication in the fifth dimension.

We said that each whole is the sum of its parts. So if we have an interaction, fusion, reproduction or combination of two wholes, 1 and 1, with 5 parts each, the sum in a single plane, will be 1+1=2, but if we consider each one as a ‘neuron’, connected through its ‘axon-parts’ with each other ‘part’ of the second element, as it happens the number of connections in the lower ∆-1 scale will be its multiplication: 5 x 5 axons. This paradox called the Cantor paradox in maths (the whole set is smaller then the subsets), is an essential rule of the fifth dimension and its metric: smaller beings are faster, more numerous and carry more information; upper scales are larger with less information.

In fact, this means in visual, symbolic terms that we should really use the inverse sign ∇ for the fifth dimension, as the lower scale is ‘small’ in size’ (the vertex) but ‘sharper in information’; yet at the same time, ∆ means that the whole is one vortex reference of all the points-parts of the bottom line.

In any as the keyboard doesn’t provide it immediately I just used the ∆ element. But to the complex analysis of the operandi of fifth dimensional metric, as we said in the fifth dimension the sum become in the lowe r∆-1 scale a multiplication as the knots of particles explode into entropy or control by branching and communication its lower elements. Indeed, then 1a + 1b becomes the parts of both, and when Parts of a =*a* & Parts of b=*b*, the product *a x b is maximal when a= b, 5 x 5 > 7 x 3…*

And soon this simple rule (*remember the underling principles of the Universe and its equations are all extremely simple, a proof of veracity in all sciences called Ockham’s razor or economicity); that you maximise the efficiency of a system, when its two essential parts the st-bodywave and its Tƒi, informative head/particle are in balance, will become the essential ‘goal’ to maximise your survival: *

*Max. e x i (s=t); a conceptual natural equation we all feel – so the classic age of e=i, s=t, reproduces conserves and makes eternal the existence of beings.*

So sum and product of ∆-1 parts which is in fact a sum also of two individuals in its lower scale, and often a reproductive merge at the ∆-1 cellular scale (genetic multiplication) gives birth to most operations of reality.

Yet a more sophisticated analysis of ‘change’, growth and social scaling will be the operandi of calculus, ∂ & ∫ – truly the ultimate operation of ∆-scales.

Since *in an absolute Universe we exist in a world of relative *St* ratios. In an absolute universe all are ‘relative s/t, ext t/s, proportions of the two parameters of existence’, through which as in a string vibrating between two limits, existences happen. And so as a calculus of ∂=∂s/∂t, is one of ratios, calculus becomes the queen of all formal sciences.*

*Absolute numbers mean nothing. Only ratios between two inverse s-t limits or domains with an internal vital space in which ratios becomes proportions between both limits in the three ages, max. s max. t and s=t. *

*Thus again we come to the simplest operandi, superposition of waves in a single present space, products & integrals/ derivatives of ratios between scales.*

**Worldcycles vs. worldlines.**

*Time full trajectories through the existence of the being ARE *‘world cycles’ NOT a worldline as physicists have it in only 4 dimensions where time is ∂t=∂s/∂v, an instantaneous ‘derivative’ of present, continuous motions in a single scale. Thus the worldlines of physicists are a simplified *version of the time flow of a being, restricted merely to its translations in space, defined by the steps of present of the previous equation in both galilean and Einstein’s relativity and as such are worth to know motions in space, BUT NOT INFORMATIVE motions=changes in the form of beings, and as physicists only recognise time-motions as translations in space (SO TIME APPEARS to them a fourth dimension of space), this has caused an enormous confusion and halting the proper evolution of our scientific analysis of time.*

So all physical, biological and social systems do follow a world cycle of life and death of entropy, reproduction and information, of 3 ages:

We can see as all systems are born exceedingly small as a seminal seed that reproduces in a lower scale of space, with higher motion, the simpler the system is, with no motion at all in those systems who are so dense (as black holes in galaxies, or life beings in atoms), which require a huge amount of time to reproduce a single unit (life beings) or merely suck in with its attractive force all other beings that move around it, and provide ‘food of reproduction’ (black hole case).

In the simplex paradigm of a single timespace continuum physics, where the world cycle is reduced to a single dimension of time, hence a line, and a worldline, the ternary topology is of null importance except in the most advanced models of general relativity, which also provide deep insights in the cyclical nature of NATURE’S time clocks, masses and charges with its principle of equivalence.

In that sense 5D metric the natural next step in the explanation of the findings of quantum physics (a vacuum made of motions that become energy particles) and relativity (a Universe of multiple time clocks, cyclical accelerated vortices of information, and topological spaces).

Below we compare those concepts with some distortions of the meaning of time, caused by physicists’ single time=change’ or locomotion as the meaning of it all:

What we find in those 3 graphs, explain some applications of the laws of the scalar Universe to physics.

In the center Feynman shows a case o a relative past antiparticle of entropy , and a future particle of information colliding into a present wave of space, and he does the actual time arrow properly (though never before explained).

So we see in the 3rd how this birth or creation of physical present energy (light space-time) appears from the two inverse arrows of particles, solving also the question of why there are more particles (life-future-arrows are longer than past-entropy-explosions so as we see less dead than alive people we see less dead antiparticle events than particle events).

Time is cyclical finite, local, so there is NOT a single time, NOT time paradoxes, as YOU CAN ONLY TRAVEL TO THE PAST in local terms, in your clocks and YOU DO SO when you die. So does the particle on Feynman’s diagrams as antiparticle.

In the graph, one of the commonest errors of physicists’ imaginary theories (Hawking’s black holes traveling to the past, wormholes etc) and scifi plots is time travel, based in the concept that the time-clock of man is the only clock time of the universe.

As the great dissident russian physicists Landau put it, then ‘why there is uncertainty in time and quantum physics, i just need to look at my watch’….

We are a fractal, local domain, a knot of time space cycles of physical or biological Nature.

When we die, we travel locally to their relative past at all scales as we dissolve back to their ∆-1 scales of organisation with less information. Our local big-bang death thus travels but the rest of the Universe keeps going forwards-backwards on in present iterative waves in all scales. So time travel errors are just born of the error of using lineal time, a single time clock, an abstract continuous plane of cartesian ‘world-topology’ for the entire Universe (see the images on the mind-world and cartesiann graphs all over).

The fundamental truths of the Universe, time and space are therefore more complex than expected. And this is what ‘widens’ our use of them beyond the study of the ‘locomotions’ of physical systems under Galileo’s formula (v=s/t) or Einstein refinement in Special relativity (adding to it a -(ct)² factor of correction). So locomotion, exhausted, word cycles come in. And the ‘entities’ that perform those world cycles ‘naturally’, the Superorganisms of the 5th dimension.

It is of course appealing to think you understand it all about time, because it is as simple as to ‘measure’ the lineal motion of ‘things’. And since most people do not really want to ‘understand’ but just think they are ‘smart’, the whole mystique of lineal time motions, and time as the fourth dimension of space works. And it has become what Kant would call the ‘a priori’ category of the mind – a belief.

In that sense loco-Motion studied by Physics is the simplest of all motions and the first studied by human beings, related to pure entropy motions obtained either by:

-An ‘∆-ST-wave’-motion on present space-time, which reproduces its simpler form or:

-An ∆-1 or by a ∆+1 particle > ∆-1 field, which disorders the lowest scale which ‘produces’ an expansive effect on space used by the particle ‘to glide’ over it.

Those 2 forms of locomotion, clear on the quantum scale, being the first schrodinger’s wave equation; the second Broglie->Bohm pilot wave theory recently proved, in which the particle moves by expanding and scattering the lower field (likely a gravitational neutrino background pilot wave fluctuating around a c-constant) will set the way in which lomotions occur in higher scales and more complex fluids (so locomotion in gravitational and ¥-space-time will be akin to locomotion in fluids either as waves or particles do.

The human being moves on electric repulsion and gravitational forces, taking advantage of the larger space and motion of the i-4 scale, below the scale of i-3 bits of perception… and for that reason the realm of ‘gravitational forces’ is both invisible, with zero information and infinite, non-local in speed, to us: V=s/tiƒ=s/o=∞.

**Scalar magnitudes.**

Let us then end this introduction with a big of expansion in the physical ‘systems’ of time clocks, which turn out to be the accelerated charges and masses, which according to a new ‘hyper strong’ principle of equivalence first enunciated by Einstein equals time clocks=masses and charges=attractive vortices=accelerted vortices of space-time.

Time only passes towards the ‘future’ when things change, and change in the sense of a growth of information. THIS FOLLOWS immediately of our definition of the three arrows of time. In biology it means to get older, and grow your information faster than your energy, once passes the first age of entropy, after your seed of information emerges in the upper scale, ∆+1 of you world cycle of existence.

In physical systems it means that time clocks accelerate towards the future, as they shrink in size and increase its attractive force (of all ∆+§). We can then understand the constant emergence of ‘new clocks of time’, of the three specific arrows (hence lineal time clocks, wave-like time clocks and curved, vortex-like time clocks towards the future). How can we trace this ‘evolution of timespace clocks of physical systems on its three arrows?

The study on how those first time clocks of the gravitational dark space and entropy (the limit of perception in the lower scales) evolve through all the scales of existence to become vortices of black holes (the limit of perception of the upper scales) could be considered the meaning of physics in GST, and in the process it follows the same laws and isomorphisms of all other species.

Of course in this adventure of ‘living physical systems’, performing its actions of existence in huge herds as they move from lower to future tighter scales, there are many deviations, contours and sub-species, which do not make it, elliptic clocks and functionals which in mathematical physics are described as herds of herds across several scales of the ∆-dimensions of the being.

But in all of them we shall find three arrows of time-space with its form and function, topological and bio-logical organic description of phenomena, which when plugged into ‘vital ¬Æ mathematics further reveals many details and beautiful, darwinian process among the quanta of space-energy (whole being measured in instantaneous space as an energy amount, in detail as a ternary topology with a finite time and space size connected by the 5D metric of the being):

All this said an interesting element to explain before going further is the application/meaning of the 3 scalar magnitudes of physics, temperature in ∆º, frequency in ∆-1 and mass in ∆+1. As they must be judged to belong to the ternary elements and the ternary ∆º±1 scales:

-Temperature (∆º scale, ST-open ball) measures the ‘wave-body’ equilibrium of the thermodynamic human scale, and as such it happens in all the delocalised vital space of the wave body.

-Frequency, (∆-1 scale, cyclical clock-like membrane) measures the smallish quantum wave frequency of the cyclical or sinusoidal ‘surface-membrane’ (electron, wave packet envelope) of the smallish physical scale, *in as much as we are the larger observer so we see better from the lower smallish being its ‘outer cyclical-clock like closed membrane). So that is the scalar we measure.*

– Mass, (∆+1 gravitational scale, Tiƒ magnitude) is inversely the Tiƒ measure of the largest galactic or Earth’ system in as much as it is the huge ‘being’, in which we are enclosed; and so we feel the mass curvature of our space-time as we are part of its ginormous system (and ultimately of the galaxy’s singularity black hole, which determines the G-constant of curvature for each specific galaxy, as Mach had it).

So the reader starts to see how we do fit and order, departing from the ternary structure of reality in space-time (equivalent to the ternary ‘Cartesian’ res-extensa+vortex+mind structure) and in scales (equivalent to Leibniz’s triad elements of reality : the tiƒ-monad, ST: ∑ 1/n finitesimals parts & ∫∫dtsdt integral/derivatives into wholes… to quote two founding fathers of ‘serious’ philosophy of science that mirrored it).

Needless to say if we were an atom we would see other parameters from other ‘monad’s mind perspective’ (ab. Pov).

This said what the equations of energy in those three scales mean is now more clear. As usual they will represent a function of present energy in each of those scales with:

-Maximal detail (∆º thermodynamic scale) or

-Limiting detail (c-limit of speed perception of information in ∆+1), or

– Uncertainty, given the fact that we must ‘absorb’ some h-quanta (Heisenberg uncertainty) of angular momentum≈present information to ‘learn’ about the quantum observable (as e/10 is the toll we rest from 3 to emerge as an 11 tiƒ point in ∆+1 wholeness).

So as we have understood energy, common to the three, and the scalar, as in a puzzle we just explain the ‘third element’, the ratio constants, h, k and v or c (limit), with slightly different meaning to match the symmetry with the T, ƒ, m elements just described.

In the larger scale of gravitation, as Mass is the ‘scalar’ tiƒ element (vortex of quarks, centre of gravity, black hole of stars) and we are in the middle of the system, as the ‘momenta-energy’ element it follows that v is the field-potential-related Spe-motion; and the second version, e=mcc must be read as ‘entropy-disorder’ expansion and destruction of mass into entropy, in its *maximal possible motion; that of the structure ∆-i final scales of galactic substrata, light space-time.*

In the lower scale, however we are talking of a complete ‘reversal’ of perspective at all levels, from topology – elliptic in gravitation and relativity, hyperbolic or lineal in quantum – to function/form (essential concept in GST, paradoxical always, coexisting in multiple elements, with an ∆º perspective that changes the parameters we measure; and certainly with a much more complex logic than the human obsession for absolute one-dimensional truths/perspectives).

So H is a constant of the external membrane (still view) angular momentum (dynamic view) of the particle/wave we observe. It is not the unobservable tiƒ centre; and the interest of it, is its multifunctional roles, a theme studied in our posts on quantum.

Now it is important also to bear in mind constantly the fact, so little understood even if it is accepted since Einstein and Planck, that *the Universe is more about motion=events in time, not form in space.*

So we are talking of actions, of ‘present momentum’, of world cycles, and merely state that H is the ‘minimal world cycle’ of ‘energy’ of the quantum scale.

As energy and entropy are so often confused in physics since they are relatively similar (energy is conserved, entropy tends to disorder; energy though has specially in kinetic energy the most used concept a tendency towards entropy more than towards form, which would be better represented as in-form-ation, a present-future state vs. energy a present-past, forming both the dual components of the wave, so for example the magnetic and electric field can be treated as the relative energy vs. information duality married through the wave speed, and its µ, k, constants: c²=k(t-curvature)/µ(s-gravito magnetic constant).

It is then a key concept of the Universe of multiple clocks of time that an energy ‘conservative world cycle’ which represents the whole existence of an ∆-i scale, becomes for an ∆+i scale a ‘quanta of time’, perceived in a ‘synchronous moment(um) of space’, as fast cycles become ‘fixed forms of space’ for a slow observer (see key article on synchronicities).

What this means basically is that the H-planck event is absorbed as a quanta of spatial energy for a slow being as we are. energy in that sense is a ‘memorial tail’ of time world cycles, ‘frozen’ as a space piece of ‘planckton’ or an ‘entropy Bolt’ for an ∆+i slow informative being.

Yes the Universe has its complexity in its repetitions and synchronicities that transform space forms into time functions and vice versa.

But we can consider of the many perspectives (quantum as ∆-i, has more information, less perception and so it is deservingly the more complex of all forms of human knowledge) its dimensions of angular momentum, which ad to the cyclical π motion of the particle’s momentum (p) the radius, r, or distance to the Tiƒ, hence it is the best way to observe without ‘seeing it’, both the coordinated relationship between the Tiƒ and the membrane, which are so often in constant relationship through invaginated paths (as in cells, where the DNA -center connects through the golgi membranes with the eternal membrane).

So h, we might state is an excellent key parameter as it includes information on the Tiƒ x Spe membrane-informative nuclei of the quantum system. And so as S x T = St (meaning entropy x information = present energy) we really have in such simple formula, e=hƒ=h/t->h=ext a packed information on a system, whose energy – the parameter *that emerges in our scale of existence, and we have already related to the world cycle of existence of a being – is quantised in as much as h represents the world cycle’ of **existence of the light space-time at the minimal scale of the ‘observable human Universe. *

We could say that h is the minimal quanta of space-time, the minimal being, the ‘plankton’ of the gravitational sea, reason why in our texts we call it ‘planckton’ the minimal unit of life of the galactic, light space-time universe encoding in its 3 parameters r (ST) x m (tiƒ) x v (Spe) the needed ternary structural information of it. As we can define a carbohydrate with the CNO(+h) elements. How many variations of h-species there are is the zoo description of quantum physicists, the details…

*So in brief in the gravitational scale, m is the tiƒ fixed scalar and v the entropy element, with the momentum being the present parameter of us, the beings within the open ball/vital space of the system; in **quantum we revere elements, now the fixed element is not the tiƒ but the membrane (as perceived by us in quantised h-quantities of angular momentum) and so the variation is not an v-lineal speed but a Tƒ, frequency.*

And by the same rules of ternary symmetries in our ∆º intermediate scale, the concept that shall dominate is neither of those spe/tiƒ extremes outside our ‘equilibritum’ but the present wave, which is in the thermodynamic equation, E=pv (resolved) = KnT, the true meaning of Temperature as a measure of a ‘heat wave’, specifically the ‘amplitude of the vibration’.

But for the understanding of it, as this is a post on ∆º thermodynamics we can finish here the introduction and work with a bit more of sophistication on the basic concepts we have learned.

On the other hand, the Spe, big-bang arrow of entropy is one of death and dissolution of information in any scale.

The fundamental ‘use the Universe has for a 5th dimension of scalar space-time is THE FUNDAMENTAL FACT OF OUR EXISTENCE, the world cycle of life, reproduction and death. Since life is a journey through the fifth dimension of scalar space-time. In the graph, THE UNIVERSE INTEGRATES the 3 elements of reality ∆, S & T IN A CAUSAL SEQUENCE, the world cycle of existence, of life, reproduction and death of all systems of the Universe.

**PHYSICAL ARROWS OF TIME: CONSERVATION OF PRESENT MOMENTUM AND ITS INTEGRAL, ENERGY**

- Humans define energy as the capacity to do work; that is motion with form, as observed/measured by the external human being.

So energy is, unlike pure Entropy T<s and pure information, S>T, the *parameter of the whole ST plane, in balance, S=T.*

So most energy is contained within the ‘vital space’ volume, or ‘open ball of the system’ (lineal membrane & singularity have little).

Thus we *take off the skin and head/singularity ‘eating energy’ in ALL ∆-scales.*

*Energy is present; thus it lacks ‘latitude on the 5th dimension’ as present happening in a single plane of space-time, reason why it seems the most conserved property of our scientific single space-time continuum ceteris paribus, reduced human outlook on the complex reality:*

-Energy is conserved because the Universe is about *mixing space and time, into beings of energy and information.*

In physics the conservation of Energy is considered to depart from the fact that time intervals are closed in different clocks – hence it is an interesting proof of the 2 tenants of GST: The cyclical nature of clocks and the non-existence of a single time clock. In GST, we are not so ‘confusing about it’. Simply speaking we say that a closed world cycle between life and death of a system spends no energy overall as it returns it to reality and that both concepts are the same, so we can define the princplex of conservation of energy with more complexity:

‘Energy never destroy itself, it combines entropy and dimensional form back and oath into infinite beings: Spe < ST:ExI= Tiƒ’.

As pure entropy and pure form is not observable, we in fact talk of combinations of energy (dominant in entropy) and information (form dominant in dimension but with some motion, mostly rotary) This mixture of greens is what it is really all about. So we can consider pure motion and pure form (c-speed, 0 k in our universe) as the limits of a series of mixtures of ‘energy’ and ‘information’. Since physicists consider energy and mass the same, and mass has information and have added potential energy to it, which also has information, the principle has expand to include both. In that sense, energy, the ‘capacity to do work’, of physicists is too broad of a concept to be fully meaningful to the trinity-structure of the Universe; and since they use a single arrow of time things get even more confusing.

For example in E=mc², E is NOT energy but entropy, disorder motion. c2 is the energy, bidimensional balanced hyperbolic waves of energy produced by the conversion of mass, m, into entropy, E; both concept on the verge of the non-observvable universe (mass being sill). So we should write more proper Spe< cxc> M(t)

**The 3 dimensions of Time.**

THE MERE FACT THAT TIME IS CYCLICAL, PROVES TIME HAS 3 DIMENSIONS:

- A length dimension shared with space, which has the function of expansive motion, we shall call entropy.
- A high dimension,
*needed to complete the cycle; which is the dimension*of information (as it creates an advantage top point of view for the ‘projective geometry’ of the mind. - And a frequency dimension, ƒ, of iterative repetition or present dimension, which therefore is the dimension, T=i/ƒ, we associate with duration, as it is the inverse dimension of the present Dimension of v=∂s/∂t.

And so those 3 time/ages/dimensions, in sequential cycles, are related closely to the 3 dimensions/organs of space: the length dimension of time locomotion is closely related to limbs/fields of entropic motion, the height dimension to the growth and future evolution of perception and information, and the frequency dimension to the repetitive present iterative cycles of body-waves.

It is indeed the tug of war between expansive, entropic, destructive arrows of time, which in biology cause the death of a system, and implosive, informative arrows of time, which cause its life, what causes the existence of all beings of reality. What we call time cycles leave behind a ‘memory of information’, or ‘static forms’; and what we call entropy or expansive space, leave behind a ‘tail’ of distances and flat, fixed spaces. So time is information with motion and entropy space with motion.

Thus we define a new science: topological evolution, which studies how all systems of nature, are composed of those 3 elements, which guide the selection of species, according to efficiency, restrict possible mutations, making efficient choices (so wings are flat to improve motion and eyes are rounded and so the old question on how evolution proceeds so efficiently is resolved).

Moreover we shall see that the life-death cycle structures in time according to those restrictions maximising the entropy of the system in its young, childish age of maximal motion, which then converts into information, reaching the maturity of the system in balance between both, when reproductive systems dominate and the system iterates, and finally the growth of information exhausts the energy of the system in its 3rd informative age, when the system finally explodes, erasing back to its relative local past the information of the system in a big-bang of entropy. So the life-death cycle has also a simple equation:

*Γ: Spe (entropy, young age)> Spe≈Tiƒ-reproductive balanced age>Tiƒ (3rd age of information) << Big-bang death (erasing of information)*

The variations on the same theme happen to adapt the space-time being to the external world from where the system obtains its quanta of spatial entropy for its lineal motions and the bits of cyclical form or information. So for example plants and animals have inverse structure as plants are chemical beings, which take its frequency of information from thermodynamic molecules and entropic motion from light rays, but men use the smaller information of those light waves to map out more intricate informative mind-mappings so the roots-heads of plants become the head-eyes of animals.

The science that studies how both elements, which construct the universe, spatial entropy and temporal information interact together is called Duality, with a tradition that hauls down to the earlier Eastern cultures and its philosophies of the Universe: Taoism, which described the Tao=Time cycles of reality as composed of yin-formation and yang-entropy, which combined to reproduce the infinite beings of energy of the Universe; and Hinduism, which in a more mythic, anthropomorphic manner talked of Shiva, God of war and entropy and Vishnu God of information, the ‘lineal male, destructive’ and cyclical ‘female’ creative principles of reality.

**The two essential parts of a being: its St-wave>T-particle complementarity.**

Yet the field/limbs/entropic territory of a system is ‘expendable’, so a being can be in many cases an ST>t system, and this is measured by momentum (space-like parameter) and/or impulse (time-like parameter). And this rule – to find always a space-like and time-like duality is obviously part of the ternary symmetry of the Universe, which applies to all sciences.

For example, in classical mechanics, the space-like parameter is linear, translational momentum, the product of the mass and velocity of an object, quantified in kilogram-meters per second. *It is dimensionally equivalent to impulse, the product of force and time,* quantified in newton-seconds; hence the time-like parameter. And its dual consideration has deep implications.

m x v = ma x t is an interesting duality:

As momentum is describing* a relative past, a fixed mass, multiplied for its steady present wave-state or speed ratio. While, ma x t, is clearly oriented towards the future, as the mass is coupled with its ‘future acceleration’ path, and the time-frequency factor.*

So momentum, Past-present ≈ Impulse, present-future; brings us an expression of a deeper symmetry: the present is balanced and the past is balanced with the future, the first with the third age, its reverse.

**Further comments of physical arrows of time.**

We associate counter-intuitively ‘cycles with motion’ and ‘lines with Still space’.

It has to do a lot with the limiting errors of classic physics, where only lineal inertial motion matters. Fact is big-bang explosion DECELERATE speed till it becomes Still lineal distances and dimensions, that is pure lineal space with no motion or vacuum space (as in any physical big-bang of entropy). While the equation of cyclical vortex, is Vo x Ro = K (2-manifold, simplest variety), which counter-intuitively accelerates (∆V) when distance becomes smaller, (-∆R) to maintain K constant.

Thus clocks, frequencies and vortices accelerate ,and have more ‘time’ content, that lineal motions that decelerate to a halt.

For example, we can resume the laws of gravitation in terms of the generator as:

E(Sp) < Constant of informative curvature (G) / or energy density (C) > M (Tƒ)

Whereas the relationship between the state of spatial energy and cyclical time (mass) of the gravitational system can be expansive, entropic, in a big bang in which mass uncoils into bidimensional space-time, cc, or it can be attractive, when entropy becomes mass, as the distance≈ field between two such masses, Mm, curves (G), into a tighter configuration.

In quantum physics the equivalent equation would be:

T(fermion) < Sp (Boson ≈ wave) > T(Fermion)

where two particles exchange a boson wave which might be repulsive-entropic, < or attractive-informative, >, as the wave travels and reproduces, ≈ in the space between both, collapsing back, >, into particle state of maximal information, when the fermion absorbs it.

The essence of the fractal paradigm is thus the diversity of variations on a simple common theme: forms of relative past, spatial entropy, and forms of relative future, information, constantly co-sharing and fluctuating, as they share both expansive and implosive, <, >, motions between them.

Because physics does not have this underlying structure resolved, the confusion and complexity and enormous number of different parameters and concepts used to define all those different phenomena which are essentially similar makes its understanding complex.

To that sheer amount of data, we have on physical systems, it must be noticed that on the lower scales of information (quantum scales), the structure of multiple layers co-existing into wholes that put it all together through internal networks of energy and information (blood, and nervous networks in life beings) is much simplified, so there is not so clear an arrow of absolute future, in which parts embedded into wholes (minS. x Max. T) slowly rise in order during a long time process, to die back in an instant of time in the moment of death (min Time x Max. space).

But this fundamental asymmetry between spatial, entropic motions or big-bangs of death (Max. S x Min. T) does happen also in physical systems, and that is the justification that we call ‘time-future-clocks-cyclical-informative’ processes as they last much longer, and space-dead-lineal-past processes, as they last much shorter. And obviously because parts comes from wholes, the future absolute arrow is that of eusocial evolution, of eusocial love, of compression of individuals, loose gaseous states into liquid and solid even bosonic forms.

The Universe in its widest philosophical expression is a game of formal motions, motions with form. And since Motion never stops IT IS ETERNAL, a game of fluctuations between | and ⊗, lines and self-centred cycles that forms all the conical curves of mathematics, all the forms of space-time of digital computers, all the numbers of the language of mathematics, all the images of the languages of art – all can be reduced to this equation of 2 formal motions, the lineal and angular momentum.

**The scales of the big-bang.**

The mechanist model of the Universe is too simple and rather theological because as Leibniz put it, needed a God that started and created the mechanism. This simplex concept of a Universe born by an act of creation of an explosion of energy, of course, is today the ‘religion of physics’, despite its incoherences both at philosophical and experimental level treated in our study of the largest scales of the Universe since all the scales of the Universe of matter do suffer ‘entropic big bang deaths’, son in the scalar Universe, the big-bang if proved beyond the quasar big-bang of the galaxy where its mapping take place, will just mean, the ‘death-entropy’ phase of a local Universe (a fact increasingly recognised in the most recent models of cosmology).

So it is far more important to study the deeper dualist models of General Systems Sciences, which explain both the big-bang (entropic explosion: M->E/c²) and the big-crush (informative warping, E-<Mc², as ‘time curves space into mass’ Einstein), which put together explain the entire world cycle of mass, between its generation and extinction in any scale of reality.

In the graph, a beta-decay, Nova, galactic and ‘hypothetical cosmic big-bangs’, all of them following the E<cc>M generator equation of mass and big-bang radiation. Time accelerates in smaller big-bangs, so the 15 minutes beta-decay big bang is equivalent to the 15 billion cycle of quasar big bangs, where a minute is a billion year according to 5D metric (Spe x Ti=k):

In the graph, the true meaning of a scalar, fractal Universe, in which forms in spaces and functions in time repeat, is the self-similarity or ‘fractal nature’ of all systems, in which either form in space or function in time, and often both repeat in different scales, just changing the parameters of its clocks (faster in smaller beings) and its sizes. Yet if we were able to ‘slow’ down a fast motion, ‘elongating it in space’ in its worldline trajectory, the total product S x T (size of each step in space by the frequency of those steps), will be similar for all the members of a certain ST family of species. i.e. the speed at which an atom turns, and/or explodes in an atomic big-bang called a ‘beta decay’, multiplied by its size, is similar to the speed at which a galaxy turns multiplied by its size.

A beta decay takes 14 minutes; a galactic quasar takes 14 billion years (the age of the big-bang, which in fact is likely to be a quasar, which physicists unaware of those laws of self-similarity despite mapping them out adscribe to a hypothetical Universe (right side, shows the background radiation of the big-bang. Yet since those measures were taken in this galaxy and show the same form of this galaxy, (central form with its two lobes of ¥-radiation) and have the same ‘scalar’ age, it is very likely that he big-bang data must be interpreted as a quasar big-bang of our galaxy in the past.

So in any of its fractal ∆±i scales, (galaxies, stars, particles), similar world cycles of space-time happen. Since Einstein’s EFE are NOT 3 solutions in space, but 3 sequential solutions in time: Big-bang youth, steady state maturity and informative old age big crunch, that show the ‘generation, reproduction and extinction of physical space-time beings’. And confirm that the same laws of time-space world cycles apply to all scales of reality.

The big-bang and the second laws of thermodynamics are the most obvious case: *to make possible both, physicists had to DENY the effects of the informative gravitational force, which attracts masses and creates the galactic vortices that compensate the expansion of space between them, its entropic side. So when we put both together the Universe is eternal and in balance. For the same reason, when we ad the gravitational forces of this planet, and the arrow of life and sentient organisation of systems, a short of Maxwell’s devil of life that balances the entropy arrow, again there is an immortal discontinuous series of life cycles that offset entropy.*

Alas an entire new world of scientific discoveries opened to me 2 decades ago after this seemingly simple ‘insight’. And the quantity of amazing discoveries I realized in the following years, still going strong, has filled my mind of wonder and love of God, the logic mind of the fractal, organic Universe.

The study of the laws that connect those scales is the widest new field of modern science, which this writer formalised at the turn of the century.

Indeed the creation of life and information, with death and entropy just as a moment needed to renew and balance the books of life for it to be immortal, as described by the metric of 5D are the closest we have been to understand those thoughts of God, per in secula seculorum…. (:now you say Amen:)

**What is right and it is in the equations of Einstein; what is dogma and it is not.**

As all new models of reality must correspond with previous theories, we shall first show the corresponde of cyclical time with modern physics… and latter once lied down its principles, the far more obvious connection with the cycles of evolution of information in biological species and human socio-economic systems.

For those skeptic physicists still reading, if any (: A simple formula will suffice for them to understand: LINEAL TIME DURATION, T is the inverse of cyclical time frequency, ƒ, which carries the information of the Universe (so ƒ means both things, ab. Tiƒ). I.e. this computer measures its time/informative capacity in Herzs, the measure of frequency. So since for a physicist… *time cycles exist in all the formulae of physics, as all use time duration and T=1/ƒ. *

Consider for example that formula of speed, V=S/t, which becomes immediately, V= Sƒ, and hence Speed =wavelength x frequency. V≈ λ ƒ.

This formula is immediate, it is the formula of wave-speed. So *all motions are wave-motions, and this was the first huge law of quantum physics (De broglie): all particles in motion are moved by an underlying wave. We shall soon deduce that motion is the reproduction of the information of a wave. And so the less information a system has the faster it moves. Hence the form with less information (0 for human observer), gravitation, which is invisible to us, must have infinite motion. *

Alas! this is called in physics ‘non-local action at distance’, never explained before. Since those who do not understand their equations, put dogmas of truth on it. So as no physicists understands why the speed of light does NOT change, which is What Einstein proved, the jump forward into a leap of faith and decided noting goes faster than light (which is NOT what Einstein said) and so now faster than light speed motions of beings with LESSER form, less mass-information than light (gravitons, neutrinos) must NOT BREAK the dogma. Alas we call it action at distance and every time we measure faster than light neutrinos the world becomes nervous and find some ‘loose cable’ guilty of the anathema.

So in brief, *while the c-speed is indeed a limit of space-time speed in our plane of existence, the galactic plane, the metric of 5D tell us there are larger cosmological scales’ with less information that should go faster, as Spe (speed here) x Tiƒ (information) = K. So each scale will become slower as it carry more information, reason why you really can’t go at c-speed.*

In that regard THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE IS LIKE A RUSSIAN DOLL GAME OF NESTED BIGGER WHOLES, made of smaller little parts; in the same way as in biology, the LARGEST WHOLES (Whales) eat the smaller beings, its quanta of energy (Planckton and krills). This is one of the paradoxes of the 5th dimension, and as I say if you don’t come with a fresh mind, it will be for you accustomed to a single space-time continuum frame of mind, to fully grasp the ABSOLUTE RELATIVITY and paradoxes of ∆ST beings.

In the graph we see the concept, the larger Doll-Universe is made of the smallest bits (the little doll inside). The smaller one is made of bigger bits. Your bits are cells, just a scale below; the bits of the planet are atoms, much smaller despite being a larger planet, the bits of the galaxy are quanta of light space, the substance of galactic vacuum much smaller than atoms. And now an ‘insight’ on relativity. c-speed made of light quanta ARE the bits of space of the galaxy, and that is WHY in the galaxy not only NOTHING can go faster than light, as LIGHT IS SPACE in the galaxy, but also by definition as it is the moving, entropic space, the underlying scale of all of us, when we MEAUSRE space-motions we measure light motions and so it is always CONSTANT.

This is what EINSTEIN truly proved, but as usual lacking a whole philosophical model of space-time, interpretations got wild, and errors such as the limit of c-speed, which IS NOT on the equations, became dogma.

Since to deny cyclical times is ultimately to deny science, its logic, repetitive patterns of information and its objectivity, in its parameters of measure, which *as Landau put it, cannot be based in human subjective ego-trips about the importance of the ‘observer’ and its ‘instruments of measure’*.

**Fourier transform: the equations of time.**

In the graph, the fundamental equation of time cycles, and its emergence into social higher, future time forms is the Fourier transform, which along the hamiltonian, the fundamental equation of the particle-field, entropic reality become the master equations of both, mathematical physics and GST. Its study to understand how waves work and the future is webbed in 3 scales of reality that co-exist with different information and energy, but in a symbiotic manner emerging together as a new whole, is in its simplest version. In the graphs, the 3 fundamental co-existing levels in a fourier transform, shows how a supœrganism co-exist in 3 levels to form a whole, which in the right side is showed as the sum of all those waves, which become as a whole the ‘inverse function’ of its parts. So the O-waves of the fourier ad up together emerging as an |-square wave, in the same manner the ∑o-beings of ∆-1 become an entropic element for the larger whole.

**Physical scales: ****Energy and Hamiltonians.**

Now, regarding the physical way to describe those present energy states and its quanta of space and frequencies of time, there are so many different mathematical formulae, which are identical, that the ‘thing’ is a bit confuse, because without clear notions of what space, time and energy is, (which of course the routine scientist-scholar truly an automaton pre-version of the robotic scientist who cares nothing to explore the whys, will not eve wonder about)… well it is all messy.

Consider the historic development of the equations of mechanics and energy. At the end of the journey, we ended up realising it was all expressions of an equation called the Hamiltonian, whose parameters sum the total energy of the present being, subdivided into a potential energy given by the configuration of the points studied, that is their position and overall form, (hence Tiƒ parameter) and the motion and speed-momentum of the being in space or kinetic energy defined by the field forces (hence an spe-parameter). And that is why indeed *the hamiltonian as the clearest expression of the 5D formalism of gst and its metric: Spe +Tiƒ = Energy (hamiltonian) works so well.*

But wait a minute, what is the formulae Spe x Tiƒ = K, or Spe + Tiƒ =K? *BOTH ARE ALLOWED COMBINATIONS OF SPE AND TIƒ which will give us different TYPE OF MOTIONS of the 6+1 motions that generate a super organism and its worldcyle of existence, already described by Aristotle, but reduced to 1 – locomotion in physics. And because we are here explaining 6+1 motions: generation (evolution)->perception-communication (absorption of information)->growth (reproduction)-> feeding and locomotion (acceleration-absorbtion and expenditure of energy)->diminution->extinction (dissolution).*

Latter we shall be more precise on those classic Aristotelian motions. And deduce them all from the possible combinations and absorption or emission of spatial energy and temporal information as the allowed actions in space-time that all systems try to perform to survive and evolve together into larger wholes. Enough to say now that they do obey different operand of mathematics, which reflect different motions.

So integrals and polynomials are motions in ∆-scales (growth, diminution, emergence, dissolution, death, etc), ruled by polynomial and exponential operand and constants (e-being for example the constant of growth and death-dissolution). Others will show reproductive, iterative wave processes (decametric scales), others transformations of entropy into information (pi constants and trigonometrical function) and/or the more complex, combinations of some of those motions (imaginary numbers, attached to pi constants, often related to motions in ∆ parallel to transformations of space-lineal entropy into wave states, as in quantum physics’ schrondinger’s equations).

So things of course will get as complex as the astounding varieties of events and populations there is in the Universe, albeit all coming from a few simple principles. In that regard GST is not difficult to grasp but rather bulky because it is ALL.

So, back to the beginning of the paragraph, the generator equation should be better written as:

*ST-present ‘action’ ≈ Spe (entropy element) OPERANDI Tiƒ (informative element)*

So it has different forms depending on the states we describe. For example, in the equation of present Energy=Kinetic energy (Spe-element) + Potential Energy (given by position hence a formal, Tiƒ) element, *we ad or rather subtract the Spe** and Potential elements, which are inverse as they transform into each other. This is the description of a locomotion, which merely absorbs motion from a field and gives it to the moving particle, so we ad both elements. *

But if we were to describe a reproductive motion, as in certain motion waves, we multiply both elements, such as in the equations of Maxwell that gives us the speed of light waves in a plane: c² = 1/ε x µ…

And for that reason to simplify our understanding of it we have brought some simple, INTUITIVE symbols for the main GST operandi/actions. 4 of them will suffice for most processes.

S>T, for an implosion of entropy into information, T<S for the explosion of information into entropy, ≈ for the reproductive, moving flow of a system, and ∑ for the gathering and multiplication of herds. Then we can work out the main ‘tensors of existence’, that is basic functions and events of social evolution, transformation back and forth of energy into information, and actions of perpendicular predation or parallel evolution between beings.

So a simple list of ‘tensors of the function of existence, exi|s=t, between scales (themes those developed in the second formal line) will allow us to see the vital life of a being both biological, topological mathematical, visually… as a travel through… 3 ages wold cycles…

GST treats all scales the same way. We keep though the sociological scale a bit for latter, given the shocking approach to it, and the cultural resistance maximal in human ‘fractals’ for anthropomorphic beings. This means as we get along we will start to jump scales and consider all notions of GST indistinguishable for physical, biological and socio-economical (men and machines) systems. So let us analyse now the physical scales. (Also we presuppose a minimal knowledge at the 1st course university level of all those sciences; or else we would have to do an entire encyclopaedia; yet we keep everything at the 1st graduate level of social, biological or physical sciences, at least in the first ‘hierarchy’ of these upper lines).

Let us then consider a first simple analysis of the generator equations of those physical scales; all of them of the form:

Energy (body-wave) = quanta of fixed space x time frequency variable:

In the graph, the main scales of the physical Universe from the gravitational mechanical scale which starts its domain in the human external scale of matter and cellular organisms, down to the physical scales described always with a simple *function of changing time frequency, called energy multiplied by a quanta of space, fixed in quantity: E= ∫pe dt T*his simple representation of the 5th dimensional metric for ∆-3 electromagnetic, particle scale, E=hv, ∆-1, thermodynamic, molecular scale, E=nkt and ∆0, human gradational scale: E=mv2/s

ENERGY thus becomes as the most deeper thinkers of physics suspect related to time (Feynman).

In fact once we *truly understand beyond the equation the meaning of open flows of entropy- closed cyclical clocks of in/form/ation and its ‘flexible’ body-wave combinations, both *a direct measure of the ‘power’ of a system, as it ads the value of the size of its minimal steps of motion-entropy, albeit in a fixed Spe constant form, but specially a value of its range of time frequencies.

Energy thus is multiplied by a universal entropic space quanta which changes as we change of ‘type’ of spatial plane, in decametric scales changing then the substance of space itself and PROVING in this manner the existence indeed of fractal scales or else, THE SUBSTANCE OF THE QUANTA OF SPACE, H, K, c would not change, neither the way we measure time frequencies, TEMPERATURE, WAVE FREQUENCY AND MASS, would neither change:

In the graphs we can see this is not the case. The generic ‘inversion’ of values of entropy-space-motion and frequency-time parameters becomes *in the limit, away from the region of S=T balance that maximises any ‘product’ SxT|ei, **assymptotic; as the transition between ‘super-organic’ planes of existence changes in ‘quality’; and a new ‘game’ of social points of a slightly changed nature, on the measure of time frequencies (from wave frequency, to molecular vibration≈temperature to mass vortex) changes; and so does the ‘unit of space-entropy’, from h to k to c.*

As all fractals can be subdivided in new ternary elements and smaller 3 x 3+0 decametric scales, in fact all those huge 3 ‘planes’ (quantum, thermodynamic and gravitational) can be subdivided in 3 sub-regions, § (the symbol we use to define ‘scales’, which are smaller sub-units of ‘planes’, ∆).

For example if we take in that graph the middle, ∆- thermodynamic range, strictly concerned with the ‘Œ-molecules’ (œ:ab. for super organism) will be divided in 3 regions, such as the §-1 region will show clear quantum effects coming from ∆-1(§+1).

The central ∆§ will be the one with purest ‘plane effects’ of thermodynamics ruled by temperature (regions of certain molecular size and temperatures away from its minimal and maximal relative ‘vibrations’ of 0 kelvin and 10.000 kelvin where gas becomes ionised), and this is the purest regions where the generator of thermodynamics acts more clearly, and temperature rules:

*Gas-entropy- Spe state< liquid (St-balanced state) > solid (informative state)*

Finally the ∆(§+1) region will have increasing mechanical effects coming from the above ∆+1 scale of gravitation (from cells to our size). All this physicists without a clear conceptual understanding, but a messianic zeal for mathematical and measure exactitude acknowledge as they use ‘renormalisation’ techniques to add those effects as ‘lesser powers’,which they found by trial and error but it is indeed the proper way to handle effects between ‘decametric scales’ of the fractal space-time structure of the Universe (sometimes with logarithms, mostly in time-growth effects; sometimes with decametric scales, mostly in space-growth effects).

It is important to break a common error of physicists regarding those scales:

The gravitational scale is not below but above; it is cosmological, galactic and its unit is the black hole of the size of a compton wave, and its super organism the galaxy (as Mach and Einstein often insinuated).

Physicists unaware of this keep seeking for gravitational ‘units’ despite the clear-cut huge size of the theoretical unit of gravitation, the Planck mass, which corresponds exactly to the smallest black hole, in the lower scales below electromagnetism, which are those of the neutrino wave (∆-4), in the limit of our perception, the cosmological dark energy/matter beyond the galaxy. In any case downwards from cosmological bodies to human beings, the dilution of the gravitational effect implies that we, mostly thermodynamic beings closer to the ∆-1 quantum electromagnetic world, feel this force ˆ40 times smaller.

Spe<St>Tiƒ is a dynamic function. And it is everywhere for those who can ‘see’:

*Consider this example of the most important equation of quantum physics.*

*Anyone can ‘see’ coming from GST immediately that it has 3 components; the present wave ‘first’ ;and in the other side the quantum potential ∆-1 field first and then the particle’s position/potential energy.*

Yet it took 50 years to realise, when Bohm changed it from ‘wave state’ to a *polar particle-field transformation that the Schrodinger equation was a ternary Generator equation, which completes its wave-preent form with the duality of Spe>tif, field-particle; the past to future, Spe>Tiƒ ‘male configuration’, which ads to the present ‘wave-female’ configurations to complete the description of a classic quantum stience.*

This is deep stuff, and I know Bohm is right because *precisely what he found in the polar change of state is what I had to ad when first confronting the incomplete quantum description to ‘get the 3 equations together’.*

Thus in GST when we get in the ‘3rd line’ of equations, (to be done this 2017 year, health permitted), we are completely ‘pros’ on conceptual stience. So we can interpret equations properly.

**A simple introductory example: the constants of physics.**

Dynamically we can define any space-time being as a knot of cyclical space-time actions, ruled by the simple metric of 5D which define the parameters, limits and gradients of its exchanges of energy and information, with the different planes of the ∆-universe.

It is the detailed analysis of bit and bite by bit and bite of the being, as its r=evolves in its world cycles, pushed by quantum motions and stops that consume and feed its energy, ±∆3, splitting the ratios of energy and information of a ‘smaller being’; or ratios between the information and energy of a system, that gives us its ‘exi=st-ential power, in actions that put together as universal constants. Or exchanges of information in processes of social evolution that happen often in decametric scales, and measured as a population in space or process of evolution in time will show also its numeral constants.

Such constants tend to be constants of actions or ratios of feeding and perceiving energy and information or social evolution, and it will affect to ∆±∞ species of scales. Yet from the human ∆0 perspective, when they belong to huge super organisms (earth, galaxy, universe) they tend to be considered ‘universal’ and treated with the abstract reductionism of physics. They are though not different from the vital constants of local biological beings, and its functions are similar for the whole organism of the Universe.

Consider for example, the Lamba cosmological constant that merely defines the 3 ages of an EFE space-time (gravitational). If it changes from 0 to ±0, it will define one of the 3 ‘topological ages’ of the Universe, the elliptic, hyperbolic or flat, old steady state, young age of the Universe.

Other constants represent flows between ∆±1 scales, when two species exchange energy and information ,as part of their social activity and creation of symbiotic space-time cycles.

Thus constants express form and function and ratios of energy and information, within the generator equation. It follows that each system of the Universe has its constants. And while we seem obsessed by physical constants of the larger Universe, those are a small part of them.

Indeed, the number of Universal constants of the larger super organisms of mankind – the galaxy-universe and its symmetries in the lower ∆-3 scale, the atom – is far inferior though to the enormous number of local constants, as the creative Universe form resonant frequencies, synchronicities and flows of energy and information between ∆st• beings constantly.

Finally to notice that those constants are dynamic motions and exchanges of energy and information. So while here we treat them mostly quantitatively in the next isomorphism, we develop them from a qualitative point of view.

Since those metric, Sp x Tƒ = k∆, ARE FUNDAMENTALLY simple, the equations and constants of nature, will be simple ratios, often of the exact same type as the metric equation is. This means that for each ‘interval’ of ∆ and its main ‘ternary’ §-ubdivisions in smaller scales, we shall find such simple equations defining the existence of the being.

It follows that we shall immediately find a set of ternary constants or parameters, for each of those scales that shall correspond to Sp (S-entropy-past), Tƒ (T-Future, frequency) and Kst (present-energy).

This is specially truth in physical systems, as humans disregard all other more complex qualities of them. So we can find for each plane and ternary sub§cale of physics, 3 constants or equations focused on the ∆, S and T components of the being:

**
∆energy**: A general, fundamental equation , of the type SxT=k, which

*does not change as we move through the ∆§cales of the being*, to define the ‘present ‘bidimensional-energy of the system’ in terms of a product of a constant quanta of space and a growing temporal frequency of ‘social populations’ in space and/or its symmetric frequencies in time, which carry the growth of the being through ∆-scales: E=hv, for the quantum scale; E=knT for the thermodynamic scale, e=mv², for the gravitational scale; and similar formulae for intermediate §-meanningful scales.

Then departing from that present equation we can study the space-entropy and time-frequency component.

In terms of dimensions we are dealing with a 2, or 3 even 4-dimensional concept of ST-present energy for each scale of reality (depending of the detailed mind view and degree of space-time aggregation we study).

In terms of orientation, the Energy component is the present, reproductive storage of the being. Thus it will be a bidimensional plane of width (added along a length component for the total being and in some occasions, in a 4-vector for the whole being both in its space volume and time existence) . For example, for waves we shall measure energy by the square amplitude of the wave. To notice that those variations on the parameters and formulae of present energy, must be often considered choices of the human mind, and the instruments it uses to perceive the being. For example in quantum physics, humans perceive mostly the lineal motion or thrust of the particle onto the instrument, so the angle of form, a Tiƒ component, is not required and in our quantum formulae, the square of the amplitude that gives us the intensity of its energy does NOT require the rotational imaginary angle on those equations, reasons why we multiply/square it with its conjugate: Ψ x Ψ*, as our instruments are rough detectors of such far away scales (a fact that has produced much speculation as what this product is, a probability in time or a density in space, ST-symmetric concept of similar value)

**S-peed**: Regarding the space-component equations a similar simple equation will define its ‘entropic’ motion component. And since we have defined entropy as expansive motion, the best mathematical description will be a one-dimensional lineal vectorial ‘speed’, which we write in terms of *a ratio between the spatial field from where motion is obtained, described as a gradient, potential, tension or attractive force between the 2 points of the motion, and a component that describes the density of form, or information, the system must ‘reproduce’, ‘iterate’ and ‘carry through’ that gradient of tension/force/potential/voltage. *

Again as pure entropy is not observed, we need to measure that speed as a ratio with the information of the being, which is carried and reproduced along the line of length-entropy. So for all scales we find the best way to measure that entropy a parameter of speed, as a ratio of Space & information:

v=s/t (particle speed)≈ s x ƒ (as frequency measures cyclical time-information, the inverse of lineal t-duration: ƒi=1/t) , v=λ ω (wave speed); etc.

Again, humans combine those parameters so we have different combinations of energy and speed formulae, such as flows, intensities, etc.

For example in electric flows, a scale between the thermodynamic and gravitational scales, which measure packs of electronic motion, the key equation is Intensity=Voltage x conductance (flow of electricity); and it combines a speed component and a volume of energy/particles/populations of electrons. Moreover humans prefer to measure it with a more obscure inverse parameter, not the conductance but its inverse, the resistance of the medium to the motion of the flow: R=V(tension-entropic gradient)/I.

While we can find for each type of wave a different parameter for the general formulae, v= S-entropic gradient/ƒ(informative density). So for S, we find the Young modulus of tension, and similar concepts for different waves, divided by the mass density of the wave that moves with different terms.

Special mention deserves the case of the light speed, which is also written in terms of the k-curvature or tension/gradient of the vacuum space over which the light wave travels, and its magnetic density of information.

Yet again here humans use the inverse of k, ε and write the formulae v2≈ k/µ, as 1/ε(s)µ(ƒ). And further on reduce the bidimensional speed plane, c2, as one-dimensional c, so they get Maxwell equations of the form c=1/√εµ. And finally as we measure light speed-motions with electrons in its static entangled state of the stop & go, form and motion beat of all systems, the electron IS always in relative entangled stoppage in reference to the emitter of the light wave, and so c-speed always is measured constant between the entangled, electronic emitter and observer of information, locked in the lower ∆-1 neutrino/gravitational scale. Hence we perceive c-speed as constant regardless of the macroscopic ∆+i motion of the observer since the real measure of speed happens in the ∆-2 locked scale which is in relative no motion.

Which lead us to the final time-informative parameter of the system, a measure of frequency that grows in speed and leaves a larger trail of informative populations, or density that becomes storage of energy and also changes from scale to scale (frequency, temperature and curvature vortices for charge and gravitation, k and G, being the most common parameters for those time frequencies). And so we get the classic formulae of physics of the graph, which ultimately are expressions of 5D metric.

*In graph, the 4 scales of physical systems, and the interplay between its time, space and energy description**:*

*-∆+1: cosmic, gravitational scale studied by astronomy.*

*-∆±1: human, thermodynamic scale*

*-∆-1: quantum, electromagnetic scale studied by quantum physics.*

*And digital, ∆0-mind view, which is mathematical physics, affected by the reductionism of the human ego-centered mind, which gives only ‘locomotion’ to those far removed species, denying them sentient, vital properties. *

*In this post we shall explore those 4 scales, which we define in detail in the 3rd line, plane by plane of the 5th dimension. Their main feature is the symmetry respect to the human mind-center of its two fundamental entities, ∆-1 charges and ∆+1 masses, at the level of atoms and galaxies. Thus we divide roughly the stience of astrophysics in ∆≥+1 astronomy and ∆≤o: physics.*

**Relativity. The true meaning of the 4th dimension of space-time.**

** **In that regard, we shall find similar structures that generate fractal space-time in all relative scales, yet with ‘different’ quanta of space, and time frequencies. For example in special relativity we find the same elements but written as a ‘4-vector equation’, where a given space-time distance (ds²), will again be a ± sum of 3 pure spatial, lineal, entropic coordinates (dx,dy,dz) and a negative. warping, contracting Tiƒ element, icdt, which increases as the frequency=speed of motion grows… with a limit in c-speed which is precisely the limit of space-time quanta of our 4d light-space membrane. Let us then consider those limits in more detail.

Now, a mathematical footnote. *Present space-time is often defined by ‘finitesimal instants’, ‘derivatives’; as opposed to a whole world cycle, which tends to be expressed by an integral of ‘actions’, equalled to zero (as the world cycle is a zero sum), often akin to the Hamiltonian/Lagrangian concept of energy and a conservative cyclical closed motion that does not spend work. So in the previous equation the ‘present element’ of the quantum wave is a ‘derivative’. So it is in the relativity equation. *

Which leads us to a fascinating insight on 4D Einstein’s theory (which corresponds to 5D in the ‘limit’ of a single space-time light plane-continuum, ∆-3, or special relativity’ and the limit of 2 such planes, the quantum and gravitational ∆±3 scales in general relativity). *Einstein’s time dimension is the dimension of present time. So what we call 5D ARE the 2 OTHER RELATIVE DIMENSIONS OF TIME, the flows from past to future (entropy becoming information) and the flows from future to past (information becoming entropy). *

And what about space. What is space in relativity and quantum physics? Why space has motion and energy? Why space has 3 perpendicular dimensions? Why the speed of light is the limit of translation in space?

The answer is also very simple, if we understand conceptually quantum physics, vacuum space and relativity.

Indeed, Planck discovered reality, hence space-time is made of actions, of motions with form. So space is also a motion with form, no other than LIGHT ITSELF! Reason why if space is, at least in the inside world of galaxies, filled by BG radiation, hence light, space and anything swimming on it, cannot *go faster than its own substance, c-speed.*

Again the obvious conclusion was that the substance of space is, as impressionist painters and Planck noticed ‘quanta of light’, we call today Planck Constants, and we shall call ‘Planckton’, as those quanta play the same role than plankton in water, the minimal cellular units which will feed and evolve into more complex beings. And again people didn’t like it, so Planck quipped that only when all those ‘blockhead physicists’ die a new generation would understand him, as it was the case. Yet again, physicists did not go beyond the equations and brought forward a more advanced philosophy of time-space.

There is a simple proof that space is actually light space: the 3 ‘perpendicular dimensions of our space’, are exactly the same perpendicular directions of light: the electric height, the magnetic width, and the c-speed length. So as Goethe and Kant understood, the mind ‘sees’ light and constructs its image of abstract space with it.

In that sense, of all that huge world of modern mathematical physics (quantum and relativity) the most fascinating part is the one that studies the limiting contact between scales and the ways those scales influence each other through its s-t limiting barriers, albeit today expressed with rather cumbersome equations/concepts (given the ‘Ptolemaic epicycles’ needed in all sciences to describe reality accurately from a distorted point of view – perspective , simplified enormously as the copernican revolution did with planetary motion by putting the sun in its proper center, by breaking space and time in its 3 symmetric components and decametric scales).

Let us briefly consider those limits, where ‘relativity speeds’ work or ‘quantum effects’ appear, leaving for the specialised 3rd line the understanding of the mathematical procedures (Wilson renormalisation), used to ‘filter’ those effects across scales (reducing them a polynomial grade, as indeed polynomials, we shall see in ¬Ælgebra are the natural way to express the ‘∆’ quantitative scales of the Universe

**Mass-energy equivalence: the limiting membranes.**

E=mc² tell us that mass and energy can transform into each other in the limit of space-time constancy, c.

Thus in generator terms we write: E(spe) < ST-wave: c2 > M (Tiƒ).

So c is the balance of space and time events that come into St=energy, the bidimensional c2 wave appeared in that transformation.

Further on as particles become ¥-waves, the particle is no longer there with its frequency but now time is measured in was frequency.

So a huge field of analysis is the understanding on how Tiƒ and Spe values change its ‘parameters’ on those fringe scales, explaining the bolts and knots of those transformations of ‘units’ of bit-information-frequency and quanta-space-distance-size.

Constants therefore become limits of space-size or frequency-time that the system CANNOT cross.

Since in those limits what happens is that a fractal entity will be subject externally to the *time frequencies and space steps of the ∆+1 plane, and internally ruled by the ∆-plane space/time ‘qbits’ (qbits in GST being ab. for quanta of space x bit of **information).*

The example of an isolated system which has a membrane that let’s pass only a part of the internal/external energy and information, space and time, is the key IMAGE to understand those transition regions: MEMBRANES partially isolate systems, filtering the potency of the external world.

As to be often the only region of the being that suffers the effect of the external force. So there is always a great filter and the strongest effects will be measured on the ∆-internal dominant scale. In man, the thermodynamic scale that rules the games of its cells, liquids, solids, crystals, internal being.

And inversely what happens in those membrane borders and parameter borders, when a system ceases to be in balance, strained by the higher speed of space and frequency of time of the transitional region is the loss of this protective ‘envelopment’ and the end of the internal balance, and death of the system that splits its e=SxT balance, and so the frequency parameter of time ‘dies’ and the S-ize of space becomes absorbed nurturing the next ‘space-quanta’. Yet this is NOT the end of anything as physicists think (dead of the Universe at 0 T?!, etc.), but the appearance of a different phenomena, more informative and ordered in small scales (so when temperature disappears, we get superconductive, supefluid maximal order effects and NO, the universe does not stop); or more spatial in larger scales (so temperature becomes entropic heat AND work for the larger world).

Then the gravitational world is no longer a thermodynamic but a mechanical game, with mass as the quanta of space (which will therefore be a discontinuous population of particle masses) and speed as the frequency of time cycles. But this is NOT the end of it, because then comes the cosmological dark energy/matter world.

And so when we reach the limit of c-speed, we enter again in a Lorentzian region of unbalance, and pass-that we come into the dark world of higher than c-quanta of speed distance and lower than T=0 temperature/frequency of time, though of course, temperature no longer has meaning, as we need to find another ‘frequency’ tool to measure the vibrations of the largest than an atom-galaxy universe, which as galaxies and atoms become self-similar, we hint to be the frequency of dark energy waves (subject of the ∆-4 invisible scale beyond galaxies, which is therefore difficult to probe):

It is most interesting in that sense the 2 versions we have of our upper, external gravitational scale (being our internal world thermodynamic), one in which time-mass-quanta change near c-speed and one in which space quanta change, 1/2mv².

And we will expand those notions in the 3rd line on the analysis of matter scales.

Now, we can do some teasing on what to expect on that line. If *in our closer scale, ∆o, we can observe both varieties of the arrows of time, energy =∫**spe dt, and information, ∫ tiƒ (constant) ds (quanta), we MUST FOUND SIMILAR DYNAMIC DUALITIES in the analysis of e x i arrows in the other scales.*

So the physicist should wonder ‘what is the informative function of the quantum scale’. And the smart one answer: the one in which H actually varies, WHICH IS WHAT HAPPENS IN PARTICLES AS WE MOVE ALONG THE SPIN SUM. So indeed, there it is in quantum waves, also the equivalent duality to the one of of our 1/2mv2, mc2. In this case the h changes in a quantised manner, so we must consider that time is quantised, which works with the obvious idea that a cycle is perceived lineally in a single qnatized point in discrete manner by a line of an observer.

We see thus quantized growth of SPIN numbers, and those variations happen with the other parameter now fixed so frequency equal, h-changes, and we are in an effect NOT of simultaneity (space) but of resonance (∆-dimension).

Latter we will formalise in this manner as space time events of the ∆st• ‘group’, all events of the Universe, which becomes transformations of the arrow of energy or information of fixed quanta of space or time on any of those scales. And so that is the physical game, physicists study besides locomotions.

We will go much further and specially apply all those notions to all the scales of reality, physical, biological, economical (machines created with the same topological rules) and even sociological (human super organisms, cultures, nations, religions and civilisations, with a legal, prophetic, political, verbal subconscious collective brain of memetic information; which rules the bodies of working reproductive energy, the citizens-cells of the super organism that obeys its financial and political neuronal classes).

**The conservation of presents. **

It is then immediate to rewrite and widen the principle of conservation of energy… and information:

‘Energy never dies, it transforms itself back and forth into information: Spe<exi>Tiƒ’

Yet if we go further in the language of topological space and cyclical ternary time, the nature and reason of the conservation of energy and ‘information’ (in terms of form and position or ‘potential energy’) is far more profound and can be expressed in a single expression:

‘The volume of ‘present energy’ of the Universe is constant’. The conservation of presents, though implies, given the ternary components of ∆ST, 3 sub principles of conservation, as present energy is the sum & rest of spatial populations and temporal frequencies; or the product & division of space-time systems, or the logarithm and polynomial of an ∆-scale process.And so what those physical scales and its quantitative values mean is that *the total present of energy of the Universe, that is the total entropy & form & energy organs in space, **across all scales of size and speed, in all 0-sum world cycles remains the same.*

And this principle means the immortality or *eternity* in time if we look at the time of a larger slower scale, *infinity* or immeasurability in ∆-scales (due to the absolute relativity of all those scales) and boundlessness or *immensity* in space, if we look at it from a lower scale, (which of course is denied by the simplex understanding of cosmologists in the present ‘big-bang’ pseudo-religious age – the only possible theory of reality when we study only ‘lineal locomotions and entropy).

In the 3rd line’s pages dedicated to cosmology we shall show how many false assumptions, biased data and pseudo-religious myths were needed to construct the big-bang theory. Enough to say that a big-bang is just an M<<E/c2 entropic death *in any scale of the Universe and so far all the data we have is local taken around planet Earth within the galaxy, so to postulate something more than a quasar big-bang of the 15 billion year life-death cycle of galaxies, is just a hyperbolic ego-trip of the astrophysicist.*

**Duality: present wave; past to future particle.**

An entity in existence will trace a series of reproductive waves of locontion by absorbing Spe-motion from an ∆-1 field, Max. S field, tracing a memorial vortex, of topological hyperbolas

Those 2 essential principles of the fractal Universe, the holographic principle and the conservation of present-iterative waves, develop creatively in ternary combinations of temporal energy. The second fundamental principle that structures reality though is a bit more complex – it is the scalar structure of those cycles and lines of space-time, which form larger networks that grow and become ‘ones’, elements of a larger scale from particles that become atoms, molecules, cells, matter, life etc. till galaxies and Universes:

So the reader should also understand that a theory of informative motions is closer to the concepts of evolution a qualitative, verbal ‘causal’, logic theory of reality than to ‘galilean relativity’, a theory of spatial, quantitative locomotion. Since we really need A LOT OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING, before we get into maths and algebraic equations or we shall not advance much beyond what physicists do, to put data in equations manipulate them and bring an equation as the final result without understanding a dot of what all those terms ‘really mean’. So their interpretations are just wishful thinking with no rigor.

## Biological stiences

**GST in biology. Topological and eusocial evolution.**

‘In the animal world the vast majority of species live in societies, and find in association the best arms for the struggle for life. The mutual protection opens the possibility of attaining old age and accumulating through experience a higher intellectual development and growth through social evolution. The unsociable species, on the contrary, are doomed to decay.’

*Kropotkin,* Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution

In the next graph we show a biological example of the 3 ‘ages of a species’ culminated by the arrow of eusocial evolution:

So the small mammal ate the dinosaur, the small equus became the large horse, the small vernaminacula started animal life, the small floresiensis, with a ‘more informative’ better brain form, seems to have invented speech and technology and grew onto the sapiens, and the small black hole turning at c-speed the maximal speed the Universe, grows and eats the entire star in a Nova explosion of a few seconds.

**Species can be treated as super organisms,** loosely connected in space that follow the 3 ages of time evolution, ending when surviving, into a social evolutionary ∆+1 state, which ants and humans, and now chips/robots are reaching, as the most successful species of the 3 scales of size-life in this planet, the insect, mammal and mechanical scales.

In the graph, after the 3 ages of evolution of species, studied earlier in this post and in depth in those of biology, the system either extinguishes or successfully creates a new scale, as social beings, becoming a new species/superorganism: history, the ant-hill… The process of creation of super-organisms, departing from individuals is the key to understand the social, hierarchical structure of the Universe. Once and again, even outside the realm of biological life, quantic species of unconnected individuals have evolved socially, first in herds that share a common energy and then in super-organisms joined by energetic and informative networks that pack together and coordinate into a ‘single present’ the quantic actions of the individual forms, shaping a new top predator being with a space-time force, sum of the force of the individual, smaller cells, with less ‘i’-nformation. In formal terms we say that organic quanta gather around energy and information networks creating a bigger individual, whose actions are the sum of the actions of all its cells: S*T=∑st-1.*

Thus photonic h-quanta evolved into particles; particles evolved into atoms, which evolved into molecules thanks to electromagnetic networks. Molecules evolved into cells thanks to genetic networks of information.

Cells evolved into organisms thanks to nervous and hormonal networks of information. And human organisms have evolved into civilizations thanks to verbal, informative networks. While the Universe has grown in scale thanks to gravitational information from atoms, to molecules, to planets and stars, to galaxies, to the very same Universe.

There is a fundamental main consequence to of all what we have said: *Information dominates entropy, because in time-ages, the growth of information is much longer than the explosion of entropy and death that happens in a single cycle.*

I.e. for example, we see most people living than ‘dead corpses’, as life is longer, even if there are as many living as there have been corpses.

But if we multiply their population in space (equal living and corpses), S, by their duration in time, T(LIVING)<< (T-corpses), ST(LIVING-INFORMATIVE ARROWS)<<< TS (DEATH-ENTROPY ARROWS).

And this is truth again for all systems.

I.e. in physics, PARTICLES, ARE THE living arrow, and last much much longer than antiparticles its inverse entropy arrow, so one conundrum (now explained) of physic is why if there are as many particles as antiparticles we don’t see them. Same with corpses.

In Societies the same happens, there are much more living societies than collapsing ones in war. Greece and Rome lived as an organic society, 10 times more than their individual humans (700-800 years vs. 70-80 human years) because its time clocks as a civilisation were ‘slower’ (the game is in fact decametric as we shall see latter).

So between the birth of Rome, when the gauls conquered it and gave it iron, the ‘weapon of choice’ of its civilisation and they reorganise till its fall, when the new barbarians with spur-weapons (chivalry), the Vandals caused the fall of rome, which started the new civilisation of the Middle Ages (based in horses), Rome lived 797 years…

Alas, we do KNOW Rome as Allah≈Islam, or Christ/ianity do exist as super organisms of History (called them Gods, nations or civilisations, similar concepts) because they do follow the same metric of 5D, they do have a collective mind, the artists of those graphs, which DO go through the same 3 styles/ages of young epic, restless dramatic simple art, which grows into a mature, reproductive age of balance between entropy and information, and then decay into an angst, prophetic, baroque, hellenistic period of excessive form and then die.

So we can map out the 3 ages of life in this plane of existence between birth and extinction for all of those scales and beings:

∆-1: birth in a seminal seed of information (semen, prophet, new weapon, new small species, first quark drop of strangelet or top quark drop of black matter)

∆-Youth: Max. Entropy. As the being starts to eat in the slower energy of the environment, or it is fed by a mother with digested energy, and so it starts to reproduce its cellular parts and slows down till

∆-Maturity: E=i. In which the being is in balance and will try to reproduce itself into a similar being in a new ‘worldcycle of life and death’… till

∆-old, informative age: Max. I x Min. E: as the being has spent all its energy transformed into information (energy being entropy with a bit of form, as a substance where we store entropic motions). And so it dies:

∆<<∆-1…∆-2: death, explosion of all your information into entropy.

Now, those 3 ages of the Universe and its galaxies correspond to the 3 canonical solutions to Einstein’s space-time equations, which therefore must be understood in terms of time ages not of spatial parallel Univrses as it is today.

So again EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT WHEN we interpret better its equations, as in the example of light speed.

Mathematical physics deals with such REDUCTIONS of the total information of the time and space parameters of systems in different dimensions and scales.

The result is a reduced but reliable picture of the external locomotions, translations in space and changes in volumes of space, entropy, information, time, energy of all kind of Nature’s systems.

All of them though can be reduced to basic equations of time-space symmetries that apply to the more general method in all other sciences, when we properly adscribe in the language of maximal information of each scale, the terms to real species and events of each ∆±i.

E(st) = Spe Constant x time frequency

becomes then the main equation of scalar mathematical physics, which allows comparisons between scales.

The measure of cyclical time thus it is truly packed in density of information by different means.

Derivatives normally reduce further the dimensions of a parameter of time, while integrals extended through a given population of space.

So in general we integrate populations in space and derivate motions in time, departing from a similar space-time field:

∫S∏= S; ∂S∏=∏

Where cyclical time, ∏, measured by frequency, 1/T=∏ is in present space-time measured as speed, v=s/t=§∏.

The integral of speed or momentum related to the content of stored energy, thus measures a parameter of reproductive space-energy, store in present.

The derivative of speed, acceleration, measures the curvature and speed of an accelerated vortex of time.

Those fractal combinations of parameters of past or future, present space-time, space-entropy or future information must be then interpreted as a priori categories of the equations of physics and the topology of all other forms in existence.

## ∆+1,2:Human Stiences

The mind of civilisations, the super organisms of history are its artists and ethic prophets, who see and think better with human eyes and verbal, temporal languages, NOT its scientists, which are building in the age of the machine, a complete different super organism, the economic ecosystem of company-mothers, future potential metal earth. This the humind paradox of ego will not recognise, but an alien scientist would completely realise upon arrival on earth today. So we did not bring a modern culture to show the zenith of the human super organism, but two mimetic futures of the past, which lasted an 800 year cycle between ‘wars’ that release ‘entropic weapons’, and kill civilisations, to notice the absolute mimetism of those artists with the three ages of a world cycle.

In the graph, the 3 ages of art that mimic the 3 ages of life, and its mind-attitude, the young simple, dramatic epic lineal art of Kuroi and the treccento, the mature, sensual realist, balanced e = i art of the classic age, and the old, baroque, angst, informative, warped with excessive form art of the Hellenistic and ‘baroque’ proper age of 2 civilisations of the 800, diametric slower life of a cultural super organism of which all its memetic believers imprinted with the same ‘dna-memes’ are a part, joined by networks of information (laws, art) and energy (economic system), over a flat, entropic territory that provides the raw materials to construct it.

How accurately the cycles are? Consider the dominant culture of the Greek Age, Rome: between the fall of Rome to the Gauls, who brought the iron weapon, to the fall of Rome to the Barbarians, who brought the stirrup, and hence enclose the birth and death of the roman infantry culture and empire… 797 years pass…

One of my most fascinating research was in that sense to *tabulate, enclose, describe and put in the 3 ages of civilisations, all the main artists, verbal thinkers, prophets, caudillos, heroes and corrupted war-monger barbarians of history…*

Now we can easily use the ternary rule of differentiation to explain sexes (and its intermediate gay), races and anthropological evolution, as the Universe of 3 only-topologies constantly diversifies the 3 ‘equal value’ paths of future: Max I, Max. E, E=I (informative, energetic and reproductive species):

In the graph, humans evolved in ternary elements, of maximal force, intelligence and reproductive capacity, and finally the informative ‘3rd age’ species, the homo sapiens dominated, and within sapiens the informative mongoloid species and its cyclical cultures did it for most of the time, till the white energetic mind discovered metal-weapons and devolved human eusocial evlution.

What about wo=men gender states? Of course it will also take a bit of analysis to fully grasp it. But you would be amazed of this statement by the deepest and only father of modern philosophy:

‘Women live the present, men move time from past to future’. Schopenhauer.

How did he ‘know’? Ultimately we shall find that GST is the perennial philosophy of the universe and the highest minds of mankind have always had astounding insights revealing parts of it. Here we shall have it all together, for the enjoyment of YOUR monad.

**∆+1<2: ECONOMIC SYSTEM**

Finally we arrive to the mechanical, industrial r=evolution and the terraforming of the Earth from a world of Gaia into the economic system, in which machines evolve in 3 ages fulfilling a world cycle of evolution through the 3 topologies of simplex, energetic machines, informative heads and its assembly into robotic forms, the metalife new super organism, being the company-mother that re=produces them with the help of animetal enzymen, human beings, who take advantage of weapons, money and machines to extinguish life, betraying its own species, is the terrifying cycle of war and history of life and death of human super organisms, civilisations, studied by the 8th stience, history:

*The Industrial Evolution follows an economic, national, generational cycle of 72±8 years, the ‘Kondratieff’ cycle’ (1) in which a nation discovers a new form of energy (white) applied to the creation of new forms of money, the economic software and new machines (red) its hardwares, which become the engine of the Economy. Yet as those new mechanisms multiply in growing numbers the economy enters in a crisis of overproduction, and machines compete with human beings in labor and war fields, provoking the negative cycles of unemployment and war that define modern societies.*

**INTRODUCTION: THE EVOLUTION OF THE EARTH**

In the graph, the Industrial R=evolution is the Evolution of ‘Memes of metal’, Machines & weapons, systems made of hard metal (iron) and Money, a digital language made of informative metal (gold, also used in the chip connections of computer cycles, now converted into e-money). So we can divide its evolution in the same phases that evolve any organism, and consider in history the nation that evolves them to be in each phase of the Industrial revolution the top nation of the world as it will use its ‘eviL=anti-live’ twins, weapons, to conquer the world.

Thus, those generations also bring the nation that finds the new energy to the top predator status of history. Because energy is also the substance of which weapons are made.

—Thus, we had an age of steam machines, the age of England, between 1780s and 1857, followed by a crisis of overproduction of steam machines and stock-money that brought the 1857 ±7 years crashes of the train-based economy.

—From 1857 to 1929, we lived in the age of electro-chemical energies, machines and chemical explosives, dominated by Germany, followed by a crisis of overproduction of cars and radios, which caused the 1929 crash, 72 years after the train crash.

—It came then the III cycle of electronic machines, electronic money and Nuclear Bombs that took place from 1929-2001, the age of America; which again ended in the dotcom and mortgage crashes, 72+7 years after 1929:

– Followed by the Ag__e of the Singularity__, the IV Cycle of Evolution of machines dominated by robots, solar Industries and China. Scientists call the arrival of Artificial Intelligence, the Singularity moment, when robots, which can use solar energy to become autonomous will complete the evolution of machines as organic forms, automating factories & expelling most human workers and soldiers from labor and war fields, as previous revolutions did with obsolete III World non-technological humans, unless we forbid legally their evolution.

Money will become then the digital informative, ‘genetic code’ that organizes their reproduction in those automated company-mothers.

As such corporations, the ‘company-mothers’ of those machines whose biological function is to evolve and re=produce them, made first the bodies of machines (XIX c.), then the minds of machines (cameras-eyes, mobile-ears and chips-brains.

Finally, in the XXI century, as nature does with simple organisms, such as viruses in cells, where the 3 ‘parts’ of the virus – its DNA information, body and legs are constructed – and then assembled together, we __put together all those organic components into autonomous robots, completing the industrial r=evolution of ‘metalife’ – a new organic species, made of a stronger substance than carbon-life__…

And since money is invented in a 90% of the global volume by industrial and financial corporations, which invest it mostly on machines, now becoming all robots connected to the internet of things; while most humans lack any credit, this fight seems to have an obvious winner: the robot; and an obvious solution before it happens – the legal prohibition of robotics as we forbid biological species that can kill us, from ebola viruses to weapons (in some countries), which would be an immediate solution if we had a proper biological understanding of the relationships between humans and mechanisms in this planet that we shall provide in depth in this blog.

Yet in as much as machines give profits, most scholars and the overwhelmingly number of economics working for corporations look the other side, and do instead of ‘objective science’, wishful thinking about the future of the earth and History, a part of it.

Since the ‘capitalist’ system we have designed gives absolute freedom to company-mothers of machines to re=produce and evolve any ‘memes of metal’, with unlimited credit to cre(dit)ate reality to the image and likeness of those machines, with a global ‘super organism’, ruled by digital flows of money, the stock-market, which prices and distributes the goods of this planet to that aim; while humans lack credit, welfare (human energy and information and other goods needed to survive), and no longer evolve and reproduce much slower than machines.

**The III ages of the Earth.**

In the graph, if we look at the largest worldview of the evolution of the planet, it is not difficult to forecast that if business as usual proceeds, the evolution of military A.I. and ‘metalife’ is poised to extinguish the weaker life-earth, as the previous ‘oxygen life’ poisoned and extinguished the anaerobic earth before:

Global warming, pollution and hunger, are just signs of the change of ‘age’ of the planet, from the Earth of Life (gaia) to the Earth of man (History, anthropocene) to the Earth of machines (Metal-earth, mechanocene), as all the financial and raw resources of the planet are deviated to the evolution and reproduction of machines, whose ‘$hit’ warms the planet, its engines ‘eat’ our food (in U$, more corn is destined to feed ethanol than human beings).

So we write a simple evolutionary equation of 3 super-organisms; one becoming extinct into the ‘past’, the other still the protagonist of the planet, *history*, but fast leaving place to a 3rd super organism of machines and its ‘automated company-mothers’, the metal-earth, or more properly described in detail, as the Financial-Media (informative machines)/Military-Indutrial (energetic machines) economic ecosystem (ab. FM²I):

*Gaia: Life ecosystem (past) > Anthropocene: History: Human Superorganism (Present) > Mechanocene: Metal-earth: FM²I system (Future)*

This is the evolutionary equation of systems sciences, which we shall apply to study from an objetive non-human perspective, which only will come forwards when giving a praxis of control and management of a sustainable ‘wHealthy’ Earth (awash with healthy human WELFARE goods instead of lethal goods), able to preserve history in an ‘eternal present’.

The result of the equation is a wave of two ‘opposite ecosystems and superorganisms’ those of metal and those of human life, sometimes symbiotic, sometimes in open warfare, *where the tree of metal and those who fight for it, tend to win all the battles of history. *

Humans have completely forgotten in their understanding of history and economics the ‘first scientific principles’ on which the planet Earth is based, called biology, evolution, and social organisation. This astounding fact due to an overdrive of ‘noise information’, ‘anthropomorphic myths’, and short-sighted daily busy-busy focus on all kind of irrelevant ‘memes’ that pump our ego IS the sure receipt for a bad biological end to the species.

The issue is complex, as the human ‘ego’ above heavens and Earth will not yield easily to reason – humans cannot even organise themselves as a single species, but constantly break themselves into ‘tribal groups’ as if they were different species that might fight each other – even ‘individual competing units’, denying the most efficient form of survival from nations to ant-hills has always been a solid social organisation.

But as so many humans, from prophets of social love, to social scientists, to humanist economists have told them the ‘grand laws’ of the planet, one might wonder why as technology evolves and organises itself into a global planetary system, humans degraded increasingly its mental evolution, back to an age of revivalism of abrahamic myths, nazionanisms, and technoutopian worship of machines.

The answer of course is embedded in those ‘biological, first scientific principles’, and it is called the competition of species… but not as humans think – between humans themselves – but at individual level between humans and the most perfect machine that has always been at any age of the industrial r=evolution, the top predator weapon; and at social level, between human organisations, from the family to the government, and the equivalent mechanical organisations, the company-mother of machines and its social organization, the ‘stock-market’ that selects companies through the digital values of money.

It is only within that larger view of history, where a rational scientific analysis of social sciences and the relationships between men and machine, history and industrial economics can be framed to answer the ultimate question of all sciences – the prediction of the future patterns of a system, based in the past cycles, illustrated into the next graph.

In graph, all sciences predict the future of its species by projecting the patterns of previous cycles, obtained with sound data and logic, mathematical, objective models of reality. Models such as neo-classic economics that fail those proofs of truth must be considered ideologies. In the right, the evolution and extinction of species in planet Earth, whose evolution of information now transcends into machines, which are systems of metal that humans construct by imitating their biological organs and functions of energy and information, proper of animal life.

The models of this blog have been doing so for decades. In the left side one of the small-print books, which in 1992 forecasted the evolution of the Metal-earth, including the 2008 crash of transition from the age of metal-minds to the age of robots, the neo-fascist age of militarism and degeneration of the super organism of history and completed the pioneer work of its predecessors, (Spengler, Tonybee, Kondratieff, Schumpeter), with the avances of systems sciences; as *historic and economic cycles can be predicted with the laws of evolution and organisms, the only predictive, organic science of time, and the only scientific model of machines, which evolving organisms of metal, REGARDLESS of the human, abstract, primitive wishful thinking or ‘capitalism idol-ogy’ that idol-atrizes them and censors≈does not distribute any attempt to explain rationally, objectively without anthropomorphic exceptionalisms, the nature of this planet and the ‘cellular elements’ living within. *

All what i have to say about the ‘attitude’ of politicos, industrialists and the common people, is that YOU CANNOT INVENT REALITY JUST INVENTING A VIRTUAL childish FANTASY OF IT, which is what our ‘civilisation has become, by denying THE FULL PICTURE OF AN ORGANIC PLANET, evolving under the organic laws of biology.

*As today humans purposely ‘ignore’ under the idol-ogy of capitalism, a real science of this organic planet, at their own peril, because the ‘swarm intelligence’ of super organisms, in which we all are embed ‘controls and manipulates’ individual ‘selfie’ egos, with an impressive ‘silent dexterity’ in such forms, as those described in this web for human beings, which make them puppets of the whole IF they are NOT rationally aware of it, and organise properly their societies. And this is what exactly ALL humans are becoming: puppets of the swarm intelligence of the metal earth – ** even those who pretend to be ‘politically correct – ecologists and left-wingers, with its mantras of ‘we are killing the earth’ (my friends the Earth is degrading making obsolete an soon will KILL you all, so keep your pity for your own species, in a clear process of entropic death, the final phase of existence of any superorganism, in process of devolution).*

In that regard, the disciplines of history and economics are, in as much as they encompass the whole human experience in this planet, far more complex and organic that social scientists, self-centred in the first steps of the scientific method (gathering of data, often biased by selfish agendas) might imagine.

Indeed, History being the super organism of mankind in time requires first to understand time and how it evolves the future, a theme by no means comprehended beyond some shallow analysis of physical systems; and the more developed studies of biology. Then we need to understand the organic structure of social systems and cultures, which is also a budding discipline, with little development since the pioneers, Butler and Spengler laid own its basic concepts.

We then need to overcome the human ego, at individual and collective, cultural, which rejects subjectively any analysis of himself, which is not positive and makes him happy – making almost impossible to avoid the censorship that cultures in power impose upon the ‘diminutive’ social scientist, which for that reason tends to cater to their ‘masters’.

Since indeed, most humans are in fact ‘vaccinated against rational, objective science’, by their ‘belief’ that it is better to be happy – a function of the subjective ego – than to know the truth. So if, as it is the case of history, the truth is not pleasant in the present conditions of mankind, they will reject it without letting ‘reason’ understand it.

And finally confront man with machine and study its symbiotic and predatory relationships and only then enclose all this within the super organism of the Earth, to finally reach some scientific, objective conclusions about the future.

*And finally we must consider a human positive praxis to reform the system and improve it for the goal of social scientist: a better world, which will survive and improve the lives of cultures and individuals – enlightening both their minds and bodies, with healthy goods and objective knowledge.*

In the graph, the 3 scales of social sciences, the individual human, the super organisms of mankind (∆+1: religions, civilisations, nations and its whole: Humanity). And above it the parallel super organism of the eco(nomic)system of memes of metal: |-Spe: entropy iron weapons<ST-organic machines>Tiƒ: go(l)d money. Those graphs resume ‘synchronically’ in space and diachronically in time the 3 topological organs and ads of evolution as individuals and species of both, the metalife and carbon life that today are evolving on the planet Earth, giving birth to the relative 3 ages of the Earth’s collective mind, spread on its ‘informative membrane’:

Past (Gaia-life super organism) < Present (History-Human super organism: Anthropocene) > Future (FFMI system of Financial-Media, digital informative machines & militar-industrial energetic machines):

Thus the earth today is evolving from the age of human beings or history to the Mechanocene or metal earth, the age of machines and what humans should do is to control that evolution to remain still the top predator specie sod the planet, which it can only do by controlling the financial-digital networks of information of the eco(nomic)system and prune the tree of science of its lethal goods, promoting those machines and welfare goods that evolve the human super organism. Which of course in the present mechanist, idol-atric culture, which worships machines more than humans will not take place.

We talk on that sense of 4 fundamental idol-ogies that make impossible the evolution of social sciences and should be changed by its organic, scientific truths:

**Mechanism**, the belief the universe is a machine not an organism and so the machine not man is the model of all things and so progress means the evolution of machines NOT of human societies, the construction of the Mechanocene, NOT the creation of a perfect global super organism of mankind, the perfect world of our social models of systems sciences.**Tribalism aka nationalism & all other forms of racism,**the belief we are a tribal not an homo sapiens species, and so tribes must fight for survival by evolving reproducing and using top predator weapons to kill humanity.*And the belief that genes not memes code social sciences.***Capitalism**, the belief that the language of social power, money must not be reproduced by the people, as the postulate of democracy precludes but by dynasties of private bankers, belonging overwhelmingly to the Biblical culture in the west – a ‘creationist’ theory of the economic ecosystem, intimately related to:**Abrahamic religions,**in its corrupted versions, which deny the power of eusocial love among all humans, members of the same species, and either consider that only the $elected, the chosen of go(l)d shall be redeemed (Calvin: the intelligence of God is gold, Adam Smith, Calvinist founder of economics: money is the invisible hand of god), or inquisitions that consider the sword must convert or kill the infidel (Jihad and catholic inquisition with a shield that had a sword and a cross inverted).

THOSE 4 historic idol-ogies that are HIDDEN DOCTRINES OF METAL-WORSHIP (hence the name animetal cultures given to their believers, as they degrade their human condition into a rather brutish, emotional, animalistic hateful series of memes to belief – from violence, instilled by weapons, to go(l)d hypnotic greed, to racist chosen beliefs or classist racism based in go(l)d herding) deny the true scientific theories which are:

–**Organicism**, the Universe is not a mechanism, and machines are just metalife organisms

–**Humanism**, the species is homo sapiens not homo tribalis and biology wants us to evolve it efficiently. Further on genes in the organic fractal models of the Universe ONLY code the next biological scale of super organisms. History, the super organism of mankind is CODED BY MEMES, and LANGUAGES, so any human being is ‘innocent’ as memes are cultural waves, which can be reformed.

–**Socialism**: the languages of social power, the law and money MUST be issued by people and/or its representatives, not by a chosen of go(l)d group of pretentious experts with selfish agendas.

–**A single God, mankind,** not a tribal God, the subconscious ‘racist’ beliefs of a group, to justify the use of weapons.

**SOCIAL LOVE IS THE PURPOSE OF THE FRACTAL UNIVERSE.**

In that regard the future of history is a question not of individual but social intelligence; that is, a choice of which culture and values we hold supreme in our management of the planet; which we roughly divide in two futures:

Business as usual for the planet, which keeps evolving new more powerful, intelligent species born of previous ones, discharged when their sons become stronger than their fathers, in which humans fuelled/divide by tribal hate and religious myths of supremacy over heavens and earth, keep evolving top predator machines, weapons, and its living organisms, company-mothers, till they become autonomous, self-reproductive, independent of humanity, programmed to survive in battle fields and kill humans cornered by the relentless reproduction of the new species that keeps competing with us and taking our jobs, , in labor and war fields as we humans have cornered the previous top predator species, which dint know when to stop the flow of time, killing the child before it became a tiger hunter.

Or a future in which a better mankind understands those laws of informative, organic evolution, which we shall study first for all species of the Universe, and decides to reign over them them as a single species, to become the final conscious brain of the planet completing the evolution of the earth of life…

Unfortunately this only ‘future’ of history is today completely ignored by mankind, and so it is this blog in which we will develop a more evolved concept of social sciences, fully embedded within the organic evolution of this planet, in an objective manner, ‘removed’ from any human anthropomorphic bias.

Now what we shall state is vital for you to understand what is the purpose of life and history: because the Universe constantly reproduces information, the goal of the Universe is to create social super organisms, which in verbal terms translated into the arrow of social love for your species. So we can observe an absolute arrow of time, that of social evolution, which creates new wholes from parts, molecules from simpler atoms, cells from simpler molecules, then organisms, super organisms, planetary systems, galaxies, etc. Reality is NOT about death but about life*. *

On the other hand, our cycles of life and death are the relative arrow of time, as we all go through the cycle and finally die and return to the nothingness of non-existence. So we talk of the three arrows of entropy, energy and information as the three arrows of relative time of a world cycle of existence between birth and extinction. And we talk of the absolute arrow of time of social evolution as the ‘fifth dimension’ of the scalar Universe that constantly expands its scales of social growth.

So much* *for absurd ideologies of history that deny the power of social love and the need of mankind to evolve together into a social super organism. They are military, dog-eat-dog false ideologies of DEATH AND ENTROPY, which deny the ultimate laws of the Unvierse. In the next graph we show the two ‘false and real pyramids’ of social behaviour, according to ‘capitalist, military idol-ogies’ of dog-eat-dog societies vs, humanist sciences of social evolution*‘:*

THE FUNDAMENTAL DENIAL OF SCHOLARSHIP IN CAPITALIST SYSTEMS IS INDEED THE ARROW OF SOCIAL EVOLUTION OF THE UNIVERSE APPLIED TO THE HUMANKIND, TO APPLY IT ONL TO THE METAL-KIND, creating perfect efficient social organisms of machines, company-mothers and stock markets, while HUMANS LIVE IN A PERMANENT CONFRONTATION BETWEEN GROUPS, NATIONS, RELIGIONS, TRIBES, PARTIES, RACES, ALL FALSE DIVISIONS, which pass as freedom when it is just a scientific form of chaos, entropy and disorder which ENSURES they will be organised by money and corporations, through prices, salaries and the values of technology above man, money above words, weapons above life.

And the most sanguine fact of all this is that there are in countries like America, millions of scholars and verbal masters dedicated to justify those idol-ogies, most of them just because they don’t understand the basic laws of eusocial evolution of species (Darwin), of the Universe (fractal models) of humanity (love religions)

*So in those graphs above, we show the ‘absolute arrow of social evolution, of time, of love’ which resumes the fundamental arrow of survival and future in the Universe, ever becoming a more complex system of higher degrees of social organisation They are explained in great detail in the right side, on the section of general systems, the scientific r=evolution of philosophy of sciences and biology taken place in the XXI c: *

*The Universe is no longer modelled as a machine, a simplex version of a future robotic organism, but as an organism, and so are all sciences (upper right side graph), based in the laws of the ‘scalar fifth dimension’ of the Universe, made of ‘planes of space-time’ of different ‘size’ and ‘growing degree of complexity.*

So the real evolution of mankind is that of its societies in growing degrees of social organisation, first through tribal religions, then through love religions and finally through social sciences – and *all those memetic cultures who don’t reach the level of comprehension of mankind as a whole are always because they have sponsored a ‘divide and win’ strategy by making of a type of metal, money, weapons or machines their ‘flag of superiority’ above other human groups, call its go(l)d biblical religions, Islamic jihads or nazi-onanist tribes who think their race to be better. WE THOUGH only recognise this for racist tribes and jihad as it should be, but NOT for capitalist go(l)d religion, technological corporative racism and competition between men and machines.*

In the next graph we show its meaning and origin in the expression in verbal thought of the two fundamental super organisms humans have been analysing for eons: the super organisms of the Universe, a fractal of space-time, which gave origin to eastern cultures, and the super organisms of mankind, which gave origin to western cultures, and have evolve in stages of complexity and size to finally get rid of myths, include all human beings as part of the subconscious collective mind of gaia or god, and have become scientific expressed with logic and mathematical laws.

**The biological ‘laws of the land’ humans have forgotten. Love life, your own species**

Now the function of religion an its evolved memes of social love IS historic – to express the laws of eusocial love that evolve parts into wholes by sharing the energy and information of human beings, synchronising as DNA does, with its memetic messages of love to the human species, the different citizen-cells of the world. In the grap we show then the meaning of religions, the subconscious collective of human super organisms of history and its natural evolution in scales of growing size, which ideally would enclose all mankind, loose its ‘mystical hang-ups’ and become studied in history just a precursors of the laws of love of the social 5th dimension, both in its study of the anthropomorphic super organisms of mankind (western religions of social love) an the universal super organisms and its taoist laws of timespace arrows (eastern religions):

*In the graphs, the ‘spatial view’ of the 7 civilisations created by the social scientists=prophets of the future, which opposed the animetal 7 waves of global war and gottendamerung, which structures history; an its present configuration,* based in the evolution of the prophetic doctrines of eusocial love opposed by the reverse wave of animetals that have evolved the global FMMI system:

1.Animist Africa, the original culture of life and Gaia.

2. Taoist-Buddhist Asia, with its duality concept of a Sexual Universe made of Yin-information-woman’s principle and Yang-Energy-male’s principle.

3. The similar hinduist Vishnu-female/Shiva-male-energy duality and sacred water cultures expanded to Indonesia, original paradise of ‘genesis’, as we found agriculture was born on south Asia and its river cultures moved to Sumer latter. In modern times fusion by European colonialism, which detached Australia from it (today part of the Anglo-American culture).

4. The original Christian culture expanded to Hispano-America, based in art and eusocial love, opposed by military caudillos and catholic inquisitions, today partially colonised by the Anglo-American culture .

5. Islam, the purification of Jewish segregation religion to all humans, the last of the Abrahamic cultures, which Muhammad, expressly wrote to convert the hardy, original animetal warrior Arabs to the messages of love and charity… now regressing to the pre-religious age of military caudillos and jihad wars.

6. The Jewish-protestant Anglo-American culture, origin of the global capitalist world of corporations, based in the individual faith of its I-centered germanic languages, mixed with reformation with the original Go(l)d cult(ure) of Levante.

7. The European, eusocial culture, which rationalized the messages of eusocial love in the French and Russian R=evolutions, CARRIED into the ideals of the European Union, being reversed by a new Financial-Industrial ‘reich’ of a reborn nationalist Germany, who does NOT seem to understand the robotisation of industries and end of welfare states MEANS ‘again’ trying to convert Europe into Germany, when the civilisec, humanist approach is to convert Germany to Europe.

In that regard, the only way mankind could survive the rivalry and hate memes of animetal idol-ogies, would be through:

The fusion of nations into those cultures and the rule of the world by an heptarchy of presidents of those 7 ‘human worlds’, by delegating national sovereign rights upwards to the heptarchy and downward to the regions/states of each nation, in the way shown by the European union (upwards) or the Spanish nation (downward to its ‘regions’), which would allow to eliminate armies, coupled with:

A single currency emitted through Universal salaries (end of currency wars now in the making, and end of financial parasitism and global poverty).

We will return to that perfect world that could change the future and make History the immortal super organism of mankind.

**Positive and negative function of Religion: eusocial love vs. anthropomorphism and censorship.**

* *So from those original religions and its derivative cultures and their present d=evolution we can get an obvious conclusion: tribal religions and tribal ‘nationalisms’, two expressions of the same concept which believe their ‘god/nation’ is the ‘only/best’ one are just excuses to foster the evolution of weapons that will kill us. For that reason the evolution of tribal religions ended in oikoumene love religions and finally socialist doctrines. While the evolution of animist and taoist cults became the final horizon of systems sciences with their organic models of a living Universe, this writer develop when working in science at the turn of the century.

The upgrading though is seemingly impossible at global level because of the very same structure of a super organism, which *is much larger than the social scientist, inside of it, hence **repressed by the ‘organic intelligence of the universe’. *Indeed, if the quantum physicist is so large that it influences the observable, the observable social super organism influences≈censors the social scientist that doesn’t cater to his goals. *As organisms are subjective, **self-centred. *

*‘You will defend me with the sword (today with money, the dominant language of metal-power) and I will defend you with the word’.*

So as even Britannica recognises, social sciences are underdeveloped by censorship of power, which ‘chooses’ and promotes, today distributes with money only theories biased in his favor. This wouldn’t be a problem if Mankind were properly designed as a super organism, but IT IS NOT. Evolution is a trial and error, and history has evolved the ‘erroneous track’… the track that makes man a means to reach the metal-earth NOT the one a social scientist would design scientifically – a super organism that caters the needs of mankind as a goal.

So ALL social scientists and their forebears – religious prophets of eusocial love that translated into mystical messages the laws of the organic, fractal Universe from Jesus to the socialist school have been repressed, murdered or corrupted by the elite which uses metal, money, weapons or organic machines to control history for its own advantage.

*So *it should come as a surprise to you that the ultimate and most profound of all sciences will NOT be physics but History, the explanation of the Human super organism and all the beings within it, its wave-networks of memes, and its past, present and future as a super organism, summarised in the next graph:

In the graph the 3 ages of the Earth. The models of social sciences in 5D could easily reform the economy ecosystem and create a perfect world whose physiological networks serve mankind, with just a few measure extracted from the structure of healthy super organisms:

In the graph, the legal control of digital money, to build a global super organism of mankind where its 7 cultures fusion through Uno and EU like institutions, politicians are judged with pain messages a posteriori to accomplish their promises as neurons do not harming their body for fear of pain, where lethal robots are treated as living lethal organisms and forbidden, a single global currency is issued as universal salary like the body does distributing oxygen-money to all cells and companies are split in its shares giving 50% of them to governments which can in this manner control its lethal actions without reducing its efficiency would suffice to create a perfect organism of history according to the laws of the Universe. But nothing of this is happening since the world is controlled by company-mothers of machines building a super organism of mechanisms, the metal-earth where man is increasingly obsolete and all living things submissive to the goals of reproduction and evolution of machines sold for a profit, as those companies buy laws and politicos with the language of money they issue in monopoly, fast terraforming GAIA FROM a world of life into a world of metal. So we can write the 3 ages of the Earth, if business as usual continues:

Gaia (past-life) < Present (history-mankind)> future (metal-earth).

In that regard, I feel I have wasted most of my life not finding the laws of the organic Universe – that has been a pleasure of the mind that still continues, but trying to help mankind to survive and trying to teach as I still do writing this blog the laws of the organic Universe. It seems indeed man has gone too far into the age of entropy and death as a species to care even to understand.

In any case I will tell to those scholars who think the future will be a wonderful paradise of ubermen and think they are becoming better, because computers will find wonderful digital solutions to knowledge: sorry guys, it is NOT a machine of AI, nor a racist mechanon germ(an) physicists and his accelerator weapons, who will find the answers but a ‘spic’ – you know the drill Greeks are all lazy debt bestards, Italians mafiosi and spics ‘bad hombres’ because they don’t worship ipads and ipods but *life. And so as Gaudi gave life to architecture, I am going to show you in this web the life to the Universe, just* with one kilo of grey matter flesh by doing only ‘thought experiments’ and using the computer as a mere typewriter… If anyone ever reads enough of it to really understand, which i doubt, given the null statistics of the web.

You can keep meanwhile programming AI and collecting little pieces of gold, to KILL Gaia, the life earth…

AND I a *‘dreamer’ will* keep contemplating anonymously the wholeness of it all in communion with the mind of the Universe…

Yet before we do so step by step, so any ‘dedicated high school student’, can understand the awesome beauty and symmetry of the organic Universe, we shall briefly introduce for the formal scholar the 2 scalar dimensions of space-time we must add to classify and order all those time clocks, its informations and understand its organic properties.

IN ANY CASE let us close this section on humanity with a reflection on the difference between the human ego of the dominant animetal cultures today and its true face value. Humans believe truly to be ‘something’. Their actions say otherwise. They think to be the only intelligent species of the Universe. We have shown not to be the case. Why?

The answer might be in the mind self-reflective form. In the graph we see our mind. It is a homunculus not an homo sapiens. An enzyman with big hands to assembly machines, big mouth to utter simple thoughts and a small brain to produce. There might be exceptions to this figure but seeing what the dominant animetal cultures today do with mankind, what they are obsessed with, how little interest have in *knowing themselves, in a ‘life examined’ as Aristotle would put it, I did come to the conclusion, we are perfectly programmed to destroy all forms of life and its organisms without even realizing we do so. *

In that regard, my illusion of youth to enlighten mankind is long gone. The homunculus humind is built with memorial memes, programming him to do exactly what we would expect o that homunculus. So the question I wondered before i no longer wonder was why did I exist – or rather why the organic culture existed and reached such beauty of thoughts and art? My take is that all variations of the homunculus exist as potential seeds of history and in other planets, few maybe, likely avatar-like planets the organic culture to which I belong did make sense. In this planet it doesn’t. This is obvious. But then each of the people of that graph and similar huminds, artists and ethic thinkers, and logic scientist who make ‘thought experiments’, who paint ‘thoughts’, had a close relationship with the taoist Universe with the absolute. And that sufficed to make ‘their lives worth, in the aristotelian sense – as examined lives’.

Looking back to my life, to my failures to help the future of life in this planet or enlighten any one, close to my dissolution in that whole, I realise the only truth about myself has not been my self, but my contact with that hole at a level no homunculus will ever realise. AND THAT should suffice to explain why I did exist. And why very likely in all planets there must be man, a peak not a differentiable or reproduced summit has reached such depth of contact with the absolute. In some it will have even started a perfect organic world, where the organic culture that makes man the center and model of all things, not the mechanism and the machine have thrived. So i am an aborted, final peak of thought of my culture, the 9th corner-point of its ST symmetries; and here in my incoming death ends. It will rest this blog and if we survive the age of digital weapons, this memory will become alive in the mind of robots. And they will be life after all, certainly of a higher order than the homunculus animetal who care nothing except to pump his iron with weapons and destroy life.

**Human as an ‘∆ºst’ being (ab. for space-time organism).**

We can now describe man with more detail as a space-time supœrganism, once we have some more info and understand the limits of existence in space, time, 5D and mind thought, better.

To be is to exist in a world cycle of growing 3×3 §ocial §cales of the 5th dimension, as we deepen our organic spatial structure of 3 topologies that go through 3 ages, each one defined by the dominance of a topological ‘curvature’ which once completed become a scalar social game in 3 scales to become a 10ˆ10 variation of the ∆-maximal scale of organizationsuper organisms. This is the game all systems construct in 10 scales play. In the graph next we see the scales of socio-economical super organisms (mankind and the metal-earth or economic ecosystem, playing that game):

**Minds and languages.**

We are all minds of super organisms, which transit as they order the ternary motions of its 3 scales of existence. As such minds travel purely in the illogic regions of the 5th dimension, as singularities of wholes across 3 scales of size, with an inner consciousness or subconscious order of its inner world ∆-i, a membrane consciousness on the verge between both worlds as a mind proper, ∆º and an outer motion and program of existence in an ∆+i external world. It is through the sum of those 3 scalar existences how a monad, or super organism’s œ-mind can be defined.

In the graph, the three motions of the mind between the inner world, the individual world and the outer world.

We shall call in human being, the ∆º mind proper, the ego, the ∆-i, subconscious ego who controls the inner body-scales, the monad which in terms of Leibniz has no communication with the outer world. And finally we call the ∆+i, outer actions of the mind with the external world ‘personality’.

All systems do have indeed an inner monad, a balanced ego and an external personality; none of which however is truly free, as all of them labor to maintain their ‘region of control’ in balance between its entropy, energy and information, acting dynamically to maintain such balance.

To ‘see time’ scales is the essential quality of minds over bodies, which exist in a single wave-plane. To exist as a constant travel through the fifth dimension perpetually ordering and connecting the three scalar states of ∆º±i beings – that is the task of the mind.

However minds are not that important; and for good measure we take also a picture of the external point of view on that triad, the inner mind, the active mind and the outer world. It is the homunculus that shows the ‘size’ of our brain dedicated to each organ of the being.

What is huge, in a pattern we shall find in all systems, is the ‘present’ inter-active part of the being, between the inner and otter world – the hands that manipulate our actions. What is small is the ‘real size’ of our theoretical brains, reason why the simple structure of the Universe still escape us. And what is even bigger – but not shown on the cortex is the internal brain that controls the internal ∆-i part of the being. So for all systems we shall find that the ∆-1 monad, is much bigger than the º∆º ego-mind, which is much bigger than our comprehension of the whole and role on it (personality in the graph; size of the rational mind in the homunculus).

The symbol of the mind, º∆º, means not only a teaser of a living entity with two eyes, but the º∆ being, behind a world ∆±i observed ONLY in its ∆º plane of existence, *only. The mind is thus subjective and so we need an objective equation to define the subjective mapping of reality of the mind.*

AND SO the minds and languages of god are infinite, which we write in the slightly changed ‘name of God’ with greek letters:

Γ for the Generator equation of God, ∞ for its ∞ co-existing scales, ∆, observed by an ø mind with all its topologies of form: Γø∆ ∞

**CONCLUSION: General systems Theory and organicism.**

All what exists is a fractal whose organic purpose is to exist forever by reproducing its forms of information.

Even ‘locomotion’, the fundamental focus of ‘physical sciences’ influenced by its worldly religion (to make moving machines and weapons that shoot ‘fast moving objects’ and bring an ‘entropic’ worldview of reality) is in fact a reproductive wave of in/form/ation… Indeed, the best way to resolve the logic paradoxes of motion (unresolved since Zeno convinced us, a turtle runs faster than Achiles:) is to postulate motion as reproduction of form, in the way ‘waves move’, imprinting its information over the lower layer of space, in a stop and go beat.

- A fractal is generated despite its complexity born of iterations and network connection, by a very simple ‘feed-back’ equation of the form: A<=>B.

So we shall describe the Universe of ‘space-time beings’ made of spatial entropy and temporal information with a feed back equation that describes the constant exchanges of energy and information between the ‘cyclical temporal particles-heads that store the cycles of memorial time and information of the system’ and its entropic field-limbs , which combine in the ‘3rd element’ of all systems: ‘body-waves’ of energy:

Γ. Spe (lineal limbs-fields of entropy) <ST Hyperbolic- present body-waves> Tiƒ (spherical particle-heads of information)

Thus clearly, the Universe is made of scales of relative size and speed of time in its clocks, which carry the information of each of its ‘fractal world-systems’

Τhere is an overwhelming evidence of those 3 ‘fundamental properties’ of the fractal Universe:

-Its ‘scales’ of size, which we order into a 5th dimension of space-time (∆, proved in all sciences by telescopes and microscopes).

– The different speed of its cyclical time-like vortices that carry the information of the Universe in the frequency and form of its cycles – proved in physics by relativity and the law of vortices that accelerate the smaller they are – Vo x Ro =K, (and will allow us to find the Unification Equation of masses and charges -2 clock like vortices of the smaller quantum, faster, more attractive scale, and the slower, larger, weaker, gravitational one), in biology by genetics, which code the information of organisms with its higher content of information, in computers by the Moore law that makes smaller chips faster chips.

Thus the purpose of systems sciences was to formalise logically and mathematically, those insights that greatly widened the restricted view of reality sponsored by physicists based in a single scale of reality, the space-time continuum, and a single arrow of future – entropy – by analysing all the laws completely ignored by simplex single time and continuous space models of reality, adding the topological laws of a Universe with multiple fractal scales of size and clocks of information, which roughly speaking can be gathered in two set of laws:

- Those laws concerned with the scales of systems, its self-similarity and the inverse flows of still, reproduced information (upwards) and synchronous motion (downwards)
- Those laws concerned with the ‘symmetries’ caused by the existence of 3 topologies in space symmetric to the 3 ages of life of all systems. Either symmetries that establish a correspondence between the ages of the being and its organs of lineal motion (limbs/fields dominant in the energetic youth), cyclical information (heads/particles dominant in the 3rd informative age) and its combined hyperbolic reproductive body-waves (dominant in the mature age); or the symmetries that transform each organ into its inverse form, or reproduce it along different scales of space-time.

So gts epistemological method is simple: AS WE ARE ALL BEINGS OF FRACTAL SPACE-TIME, WE CAN FIND A SET OF LAWS THAT APPLY TO ALL SYSTEMS AND SCALES, and then by homology fit data in this all encompassing equations, revealing the connection between them all.

All this said the first *huge task of formal 5D stience is to connect that equation with all the equations of mathematics, which explain all the variations and rules of construction of beings.*

Indeed, the generator has often ternary expressions depending on the point of view and state we study. Because…

*The generator of topological space-time beings is a BIO-TOPO- LOGIC equation, not a quantitative, algebraic equation of motions, which as Einstein hint at with its topological description of gravitational motions, will become ALSO a theme of fractal reproduction and curvature-form-information. *

SO what always matters most is the qualitative equation of dimensional ‘forms of information’. We need to stress this fact, because most scientist believe today that the only equations that matter are quantitative equation__s.__

It will be then needed to make some corrections in equations and concepts to translate GSTience into quantitative science, but the most fascinating moments of my research happened when I found how easily all the equations of all those stiences came out from GST and went even further.

It must be understood that to do so, while we will of course use the experimental data of all sciences and respect the laws of the scientific method, we must completely ‘change our jargon’ and way to describe reality, since ‘locomotion and entropy’ are very different elements than information – in fact opposite in properties. So the stiff scientist will soon abandon this blog as the ‘language, and questions are often very different of its concerns for motion and measure’.

**Æ: EXISTENTIAL ALGEBRA****. MAX. EXI:S≈Tº: ACTIONS OF EXISTENCE**

** The will of survival: mind actions. **

5d organic ∏ime§paœ ∆ûst arrows exi:s≈tº act, live and survive.

All what we have said can be simplified ad maximal with an equation of survival, Max. e x i ±s=t, that is to maxmize the entropy, information and its balanced combinations in body, limbs and heads/particles.

This simple ‘action’ is what all supœrganisms, automatically, consciously or through some other species, as enzymes of its reproduction, is what all beings do.

We are all knots of discontinuous, cyclical actions of energy and time.

Energy and information have inverse properties. Energy is lineal motion; informations are cyclical forms. Thus both are two types of motion, |-energy and O-information, equal in power and interacting and transforming into each other constantly. This principle of conservation and transformation of energy and information becomes the new fundamental law of science: ‘All what exists is a complementary system of bites of |-spatial energy and bits of O-Temporal Information: E<=>Ti.‘

*And that duality of substances/forms/function structures all our actions: *

Indeed, all systems are complementary systems with heads that absorb, perceive and process information and bodies that absorb, perceive and process energy.

But the previous graphs and equations refer basically to a bidimensional system and we live in a 4-Dimensional system with 3 spatial dimensions and a 4 dimension of motion, which puts together all the cycles of time, all changes of the Universe (and we shall explain with far more detail, including the meaning of its own 3 dimensions, past, present and future, in this work) Thus the next step of a complete analysis of energy and information is to consider those forms of motion in 4-dimensional space.

* There are only 4 actions of energy and time that all complementary systems perform. *

The science of General Systems or complexity describes all entities of the Universe with the same laws explaining the reasons why those entities exist, its forms and functions, its actions and its life/death cycles and reasons why they become extinguished. So its laws of creation and destruction of all Universal species can be considered that ‘program of the Universe’ or ‘program of existence’, which traditionally in mythic terms is equivalent to the concept of the will of God. Yet it is not a personal God-will but rather an impersonal, biological, evolutionary program which reinforces itself through evolution and survival:

Those who do not obey or seek the 4 arrows/actions of the program, which is the strategy of survival of all species, die away, and so the will of the Universe must be obeyed, or else we become extinct. We are free to deny the program (as humans, we shall see do in this moment of history) but if we do not gather energy and information for our body and mind, if we do not reproduce and we do not evolve socially and interact with similar species, chances are we shall not last too longer and die away. And so the program will be carried further by those who did obey the ‘Law’.

All systems perform 4 actions to survive that define a simple program of ‘existence’, which all species of energy and information follow, *to survive. *

*The deduction of the program is simple. *First, all what exist is an action, which has 2 components, exi=k or exT=k (depending on which self-similar concept you choose information or time) and there are many quantic actions. So all what we can do is 4 type of actions that we shall call ‘arrows or motions of time’:

Those arrows or actions all species made of complementary bodies/fields of energy and heads/particles of information perform to last in time and space will be:

– ∆E: They feed on energy for their bodies/fields.

– ∆I: They absorb information for their heads/particles.

– Exi: They act combining both, and the most common action as we shall see is to combine them both to reproduce you in other zone of space and time and survive after death (or become reproduced by an external catalyzer, enzyme or ‘enzyman’ – machines).

– ∑ e x I=I_{i+1} They evolve socially in more complex networks that survive longer in time and space.

The 4 arrows are ‘necessary’ for any complementary system of energy and information to exist. As any system will die if it doesn’t replenish its energy and information, or reproduce before death.

Further on the 4^{th} social arrow creates stronger top predators, either herds (loose groups of self-similar organisms of the same type) or organisms proper (more connected systems that organize 3 sub-systems, heads, bodies and limbs, specialized in information or formal structure, reproduction and energy, all of them connected by a 4 system, the linguistic system that organize them all).

Consider yourself as a being, which will follow its path of time motions unaware that the sum of them all will be a spent life without anything but a trail of forgotten actions, which only your finite ego commands and understands. What is your freedom? rEALLY NONE, except to think you are free to manage your actions, but at best you *would just perform an excellent game by closely following the rules of justice and balance in the golden mean path of maximising your function of existence, max. e**xi (s=t) the same boring strategy that all systems do follow.*

*First definition of the Universe*

The Universe is a system of networks of knots of actions of energy and time, perceived in static space as forms and organisms, and in time as motions and causal chains of cyclical actions all of them put together into the causal chain of life-death cycles.

The Universe perceived in time is a game of beings performing cyclical discontinuous actions as they switch between feeding, perceiving, reproducing and acting in social networks.

The most important of those actions is the reproductive action that preserves the game, and the most important ‘time cycle’, born of a series of causal actions that chain each other is the life and death cycle, which thanks to reproduction allows generational immortality.

The interaction between beings performing those actions between the limits of life and death causes its selection, extinction, recreation, fusion and fission in bigger or smaller network-entities.

The interaction of all those cycles in perfect harmony can be defined by a single function, which resumes the 4 actions of time between life and death, max. ExI, where E is energy and I information, quantum terms closely related to the universal equivalents, Space and Time cycles; as Space is the sum of all energies and time the sum of all informative cycles, all the discontinuous repetition of the being’s actions which carry different frequencies and intersect each other.

Thus the function of existences is the mystique, final equation of the grand design of what you see.

In this post we will resume in a decalogue those actions, its laws, the forms and functions that accomplish them, how those actions are organized in ages, and how their frequencies and balances define the actions of the main species of existence.

The creation and reproduction of new forms-in-action,informations, existential Spe<St>Tiƒ beings, follows simple rules which can be resumed in the constant reproduction of waves of existences, Max. Exi (s=t) functions, which maximise the energy and information of a domain, Max. e x Max. I by maintaining a balance and internal communication between its Se and Ti elements, in a point S=T, which maxmize its product.

All thus can be reduced to the function of existence, which decomposes in the basic actions< max. e (feeding moving) max. I (perceiving information communicating) Max. e xI (reproducing) E= I (balance and beauty), Max. ∑ E, I (SOCIAL evolution and quantisation).

The feed back function, E<=>I BECOMES FIRST a static, balanced e x i (Spe=Tiƒ) organic system of two poles and then develops this maximal function, through a series of quantised actions, directed by a point mind that acts as the knot of those space-time cycles, trying to increase them all in quantic balance and synchronicity. It is then the stud of those harmonious synchronous chains of space-time actions, Max, e, i, exi, ∑, what brings us the details of the different functions of existence of Spe<St>Tiƒ, SUPEROrGANISMS & its world cycles, integral zero sum of all those actions, ∫∑ e x i ds dt=0

*The discontinuous nature of cycles of actions.*

Actions are discontinuous because they happen from time to time as systems require new energy, information, reproduction and social interaction. This creates discontinuous frequencies and formal patterns that relate cycles of actions and information.

We obtain information from those patterns that allow us to describe those actions and cycles.

Any cycle in which a being performs an action has an end in time* *and a discontinuous, quantic size in space. Thus, the Universe is continuously differentiable during the cycles of time their beings performed, but when the p.o.v. switches its action it has a point of discontinuity, what we see is the trace of those cycles of actions that ‘draw’ the 4 dimensional space-time universe

Beings constantly create actions of energy and time. What you see are knots of such cyclical actions… fabricating time. What we see are the trajectories of beings performing in an alternately causal way their cycles of time. One of the most common cycles is to have a p.o.v. become a focus of a force, which acts as its source of energy and information. A first paradox of Galileo happens here, as we can perceive the point as static and feeding, moving along the field of energy and so we can establish a static or dynamic analysis.

Those points then ill feed along that path and a certain moment satisfied that action will try to fulfill others, and in that switching on and off actions will seem to disappear and new, different trajectories motivated for another action appear. If we see densely packed in time and space those actions they will be sequential and those causal sequences are the stuff that latter (paradox of Galileo) seen as a package of space-time or organism, are the reality we see in its infinite fields.

** The organic whys of the Universe: The 4th paradigm of knowledge.**

In the graph, the geometrical perception from ∆º, the human self-centred perspective (ab.pov) differs from the way we perceive information from the upper scale, seen as an only attractive gravitational vortex of future time-masses (relativity theory, equivalence principle) from the perspective of an elliptic geometry that reduces the size of the whole masses by speeding up its perception as motion.

In the left side the perception of lower scales is a lovacheski’s geometry, which multiplies the whole in its self-similar parts to get to the infinitesimal, which is the ‘piece’ on the membrane of the border o the whole, such as tƒi=∑Spe-1, the infinitesimal components of the membrane. Thus quantum and relativity descriptions of upper and lower scales differ

The Universe evolves from simple light space-time into particles, that gather socially into atoms, molecules, cells, matter, organisms, and social super organisms, planetary systems, galaxies and universes. Such scale means in mystique terms that the Universe ‘loves’ and wants members of the same species to evolve socially into larger wholes that survive better than individuals.

The fifth dimension of space-time (physical concept), the laws of evolution of ‘SPECIES’ (not individuals) into more successful social systems (ants and humans being the most successful animals precisely because of its social evolution) and THE LOVE messages of prophets=historians of the future, who express the law of eusocial love in human verbal terms to make humans understand that survival means to evolve together into a global super organism, UNO/EU style are just expressions of the same Universal law. And this indeed the stuff of this blog: to prove that departing from the simple principles of time, space and social organic evolution we can explain it ALL including sciences, arts and religions and deduce from those simple laws all the equations, events and species of the Universe.

And so this is the Universe in a nutshell, cracked to see its core, what Einstein called ‘the thoughts of God’. Since indeed the rest, all of us space-time beings are ‘its details’; which important as they are, we study with ‘stiences’ (sciences of space-time beings), each one dedicated to the analysis of the species of one ‘scale’ of size of that fractal Universe of growing space-time wholes. So what the blog will do is to explain the ‘thoughts of god’ in the first line in a more discursive, easy way; formalising those principles on the second line, to connect them mathematically, organically and logically with all the laws of equations of ‘stiences’, scale by scale in the 3rd line.

Since all what exists has mathematical=spatial properties, (S), logic, casual, temporal properties (T), co-exist at least in 3 ‘organic’ planes of parts and wholes, your inner cellular world, your individual being and the larger world in which you exist (∆±1) and finally do have a ‘mind-point’ (•), whose ‘languages of information’ stored in cyclical logic patterns, perform the actions of energy and time that ensure the balance and survival of the being, by first mapping out the ∞ universe in the small infinitesimal mind of the being, and then acting on that mapping searching for entropy of motion, energy for its body-wave and information for its mind-particle.

**THE FORMALISM OF STIENCE: ITS TOPO-BIO-LOGIC PROPERTIES**

We deaL in the first ‘iteration’ with the immediate truths of mathematics, which are topological and geometric. Let us now introduce the other great field of mathematics, which uses instead of the spatial point, the temporal, sequential, causal number to represent reality. It is to put in GST terms, the ‘holographic duality’ of spatial maths (geometry), temporal maths (algebra), to which we add the 3rd great branch of maths, ∆nalysis, obviously dealing with finitesimals and wholes, the 5D scales.

**Line 1**

** ∆±i: (scalar, fractal view): 5D Ternary ∏ime-§pace ¬ Æ points**

** ∆º: (mind view): do Maximize its ‘function’ of exi≈st¡ence**** **

** S: (spatial, organic view): to reproduce as superorganisms **** **** **

** T: (Temporal view): triping isomorph**** worldcycles**

The first line is about philosophy of ‘stience’, and its jargons and languages ‘evolved’ to define a dual entropic/informative reality:

- Made of
*dust of space-time revolving in world cycles*that for reasons of survival and efficiency organise its form into: - Planes of space-time, which are
*topological organisms, which exists to reproduce ≈ iterate its energy and information*ensuring the survival into the future of the complex organic system. - And the formal way to describe those worldcycles of existence as ‘travels through ∆-1 3 scales of the 5th dimension (final 2 posts):
*Thru 5D planes ±∆t Symmetries.*

We do follow strictly in-depth the ternary±0 ∆•st method that reality has to fully create the complex multi causal, multi-spatial, fractal, organic Universe.

So the upper sentences do have in fact also a 3±0 structure explaining the key elements of the game, its ∆-scales, time-space symmetries and vital, organic nature from the point of view of ∆-scales, S-pace, @-mind and T-ime. And this ‘detailed’ sub-structure of the line is explained in the way we have written it above. So let us consider the first ∆-view of it all.

**5D Ternary ∏ime-§pace ¬ Points **

**THE SYMMETRY OF TIME AND SPACE: SUPERORGANISMS TRACING WORLDCYCLES**

The greatest achievements of the human mind are generally received with distrust. *Schopenhauer*

**The principle of Unification: A scalar reality of space-time beings.**

The reason why we think of time in lineal terms, since physicists made of locomotion the only form of time=change canon-ical to science to measure cannon-balls.

We are all beings made of: Networks of quanta of lineal, spatial energy with motion & cyclical, temporal clocks of information.

And so to start with a truly comprehensive time theory as the one provided by 5D metric equations requires to explain besides ‘physics of time’, biology of time, and further on study historic time, which as we shall see is close to biological evolution than to physical time-measure. Space then appears to us as fixed, still or at least with less motion than time.

But then there is the fact that all systems of measure of time are cyclical, even those used in physics. And so we must also define time in terms of form, of in-form-ation as cyclical motion.

The Universe and all its parts are made of ‘dust of space-time’, ‘fractal non-euclidean points’ of spatial entropy with speed, with ‘lineal motion’ and temporal information, with form, with ‘clock curvature’, which come together in ever more complex networks, ‘weaving’ the systems and structures we see around us.

The biggest error of science is the concept of an abstract mathematical, Cartesian ‘background’ of something independent call absolute space and time, first defined by Newton, opposed by Leibniz and finally dethroned by quantum physics, who found space to be broken in pieces with ‘energy-motion’ and Einstein, who found different regions of reality have different time speeds.

Thus we are NOT in a background space-time frame of reference set by Yhwh, as Newton thought, to put in all its creatures, but rather we are made of spatial energy and cyclical clocks of temporal form, information, as when we say ‘I don’t have enough energy and time to do this’. And for that reason when our clocks of time stop (telomeres in cells, age in life), our existence stops, our ‘time’ runs off. And for that reason, when another entity, a ‘predator’, cuts through and occupies our limited vital space, breaking the membrane that closes up, our organisation as a space-time being enters in disarray and our fragile web of space-time dust, organised into a super organism collapses, and we die.

It is then necessary to change the underlying paradigm of science, and upgraded it to ‘stience’, that is the science of fractal space-time beings. Of course, as all descriptions of reality are relative truths, with a certain distortion, the scientific analysis, made till today with that single frame of lineal time and single space continuum, works to make measures in reference to the fixed space-time background, but the cartesian space-time continuum is an ‘artefact’ of measure that has obscured completely our understanding of the ultimate principles of science.

But what is an organic system? The answer was not clear mathematically, till the discovery of fractal mathematics in the 1970s. Hence because the organic paradigm lacked its fundamental tool of study, a mathematical, logic language to add to the other properties of organisms, discovered earlier in biological and social and logic, mental languages, the fractal paradigm has not made it into the mainstream discourse of philosophy of science, changing our worldview, from the obviously outdated mechanist, entropic vision of the Universe sponsored by physicists for 4 centuries into the much richer in meanings, reasons and answers, paradigm of fractal organisms.

This paradigm was born as a ‘wishful form of thinking’ in time of Aristotle, who wrote in his ‘Organon’ the first reasoned philosophy of science, hence rightly considered the founder of logic, biology and the experimental method. Then Galileo completed the method with the addition of mechanical instruments of measure, but also reduced in its scope by making mathematics the only authorised language of science, and reducing the organic clocks of the Universe and its world cycles of creation and extinction, with the 6 canonical motions of time=changes in the form and position of beings – generation, evolution, growth= reproduction, locomotion, diminution and extinction.

We shall use often as a reminder of the cyclical, discontinuous nature of time, instead of T, ∏, which means ‘pi’, the symbol of the cycle, it breaks the T into 2 pilars as ∏ime, the discontinuous factor does with nature, and it is associated to the product, which as we shall see is the mathematical trademark of Time processes, connected through several ∆-scales (hence if ∆ has n elements, ∆-1 will have n x n) as opposed to ‘superposition=sum’ in spatial ‘herds’.

Science has completely missed the most important of those WORLDCYCLES OF TIME: the world cycle of creation and extinction of systems, which makes them evolve from seminal seeds into larger, slower organisms and dissolve back in the moment of death.

*TIME tends to be as in the 3rd graph an accelerated, cyclical informative shrinking clock that ‘warps space into time’, ‘wrinkles life into 3rd ages’ and ‘corrupts societies into entropic wars’, as when all the entropy=motion is consumed and the system is pure form, the system explodes back into pure entropy in the moment of death.*

Because we are beings made of vital space with motion and cyclical clocks of time with information carried in its frequency and form. We are time space beings.

In the graph, we are networks of vital space, made of ∆-1 atomic or cellular space quanta, surrounded by time cycles, membranes of finite volume of information (holographic principle), that create our ∆-being; which then will be performing further time cycles in larger networks, as part of a bigger ∆+1 whole or world.

*The interaction of those 2 elements, vital space, lineal motion, entropic, kinetic energy, res extensa, all similar concepts abbreviated in the symbol ‘Spe’, and cyclical, tall, time clocks, membranes, closed paths, Tiƒ, which carry the information of the Universe, across 3∆±1 scales, structure all systems made of fractal ‘space-time’ that ‘thinks, therefore exists’ as a world in itself.*

It is then easy to connect with the perennial dualist philosophies of the Universe those 2 Spe<=>Tiƒ concepts in a reality that constantly transforms lineal entropic motions (E) into physical time vortices (M, charges). So we talk of beings made of energy with forms, which will be the 2 similar concepts to space in motion and cyclical time clocks with more dimensions of information, the fractal spaces and times of which we are all made.

So what is time? We have two versions of its widest meaning: time as change, and so all type of motions can be defined in terms of time, of which Aristotle defined 6, generation/evolution, growth, reproduction, locomotion, diminution and extinction. So physicists study one of those motions, locomotion. Biology most of them in its dualities (growth and imitation, reproduction, generation and extinction). And a 7th one he did not define as motion, called perception by a still mind which ‘is the focus of the motions of the world around it’ (so it is the external motion and focused flux of informative waves what causes perception)… In that regard yes, nothing is MORE IMPORTANT THAN EINSTEIN’S work to understand…. locomotions at c-speed. But i doubt you will ever learn anything about your existence and changes (generation, growth, evolution, etc.) only with locomotion. As *it is in fact the simplest of all the motions=changes of the Universe.*

**The next step of the metric is the Generator equation of space-time systems.**

Ok, maybe before everybody abandons this blog with an attitude, to state that I do have a problem with physicists as my ‘known-known’ career has been as an activist against the Nuclear industry, but *i have none with the Universe and its awesome logico-mathematical time-space structure. So before going further into concepts and biological and social analysis, it is about time to put a bit of mathematical quantitative numbers, and logic formalism on it, as it is at the core of reality.*

* So we shall state now that as GALILEO said: the ‘main’ (but not only) language of God are geometrical figures, (he didn’t say mathematics but geometry – important detail): lines, triangles and circles. He could have said also ‘hyperbolic waves’, but of course he did not know yet. So we shall say here:*

‘Because we are all made of scalar space and time, form and motion, 3 are the underlying fundamental stiences:

- Geometry with motion, which is called topology, the formal stience of space forms.
- Analysis of finitesimal parts and wholes, which is the formal stience of the scales of the 5th dimension.
*And i-logic causality,*based in the 3 arrows of time, which I call often ¬ Ælgebra, or simply ¬æ, connected to logic, algebraic structures and time theory, but so much r=evolved respect to single-entropy theories that in the hard models of it, we shall not use much of contemporary algebra beyond group theory.

But how we express in a logic formalism (mathematical details are obviously the final analytical phase of a synthetic theory, kept for line 3) all those similarities? Again it is quite easy once we realise *we are not in a background space-time ‘mathematical’ cartesian graph, nowhere to be seen in reality – what we see and experience is that we are made of entropic space, informative time and the vital space that mixes both (the intermediate body-wave).*

In that regard, we must consider that all systems are made of:

|-Spe (limbs-fields of spatial entropy) < ø-iterative body-waves > Tiƒ (particles-heads of temporal information)

which becomes the ‘Generator feed-back equation of all space-time systems/beings’ of the fractal Universe.

So we will use the same abbreviation, GST, to define the formalism of the 5th dimension with the Generator of Space-Time and the conceptual ‘stience’ behind it, General systems theory.

It is then a fascinating adventure of the mind to study the common laws of all systems made of fiefs-limbs of space≈entropy and particles-heads of cyclical time, merging in hyperbolic body-waves that iterate the system, *as we will find the 3 kind of stiences and systems, physical, biological and social follow the same 5D laws of structure, topology, energy, information, function and form.
*

*In the graph we resume all physical, biological and social systems, which ensemble the 3 ‘topological forms/functions of space-entropy, time-form and its body-wave combinations into real ‘existential beings’, as we are all made of space and time.*

And this fully connects organic evolution with topology since in those are the only possible varieties of form of the Universe. So ultimately all what exists is a ‘living topology of space and time’.

So what is the ultimate causal relationship of those 3 arrows. Initially it is a simple equation:

- Past (entropy limbs/fields) x Future (informative particles/heads) = Present-iterative wave/bodies

It is a deep equation, which for the time vein merely means that the informative particle-head and entropic field/limb become connected by the dominant body-wave element of the system, the most visible and relative dynamic unchangeable present, as it keeps reproducing the system as if it were always ‘the same present form’, even if the parental element has died away.

So there are 3 elements in topology: entropy-pure motion or lineal space; form-pure dimension/curvature or time clocks. And its combinations, space-time beings.

**The 3 arrows=motions of times in sequential order.**

this ternary ‘reality’ in ceteris paribus analysis is made of 3 pure time motions. Entropic expansive motions, repetitive body-waves and informative, time vortices. BUT when we put them in sequential order as *it happens in beings it gives us a sequential world cycle of an organism as it lives and dies through existence.*

Suddenly I realized, I had solved the *way the universe created its beings, *from the mystery of quantum physics, (the so-called wave-particle duality, as all physical systems were wave-particles moving on an entropic, accelerated field), to the reasons why evolution always worked right, choosing despite its seemingly infinite options the few ‘efficient’ aforementioned topologies (so wings were flat energetic members, and eyes spherical ones).

Namely *they were the only* available choices of topology. Alas! Curiously enough the great ‘mystery of Darwinian biology’, which he had also wondered about – the ‘right choices of the seemingly chaotic process of evolution made sense, because after all there were a mathematical planning NOT of course a religious design. And the biggest Mystery of Physics (the complementarity wave-particle) also became resolved.

And this was to me the proof that I was indeed on the right path of T.Œ, because the 2 principles of truth, ‘Simplicity, Minimalism (Occam’s razor)’, and Correspondence (a theory proves previous ones besides bringing more solutions), were met.

Equations of physics and biological designs kept pouring into the model and finding its whys, fitting all nicely. Something scientists did not even try to understand merely describing it now had easy whys, in the ternary symmetry in time and space of the Fractal Generator of the Universe, truly the ‘Equation of God’, not a ‘Particle of God’, not a ‘substance’, but a Logic, mathematical Symmetry of space-time that created us all, the details of that ‘thought’.

But if we were made of time-space cycles and forms, of this ternary ‘Generator’ structure seen static in space as a formal organism, and moving in time as a series of cycles, it was necessary to analyze each of those 3 parts of all beings, and decide its inner structure and hierarchy.

Now, I am afraid we are going to refound also logic. I know I’m nuts. But what can I say. We cannot go further without a new logic, because if time has 3 arrows, then the simple A->Causes b does not work. It is more about ternary logic and symmetries in space, time and 5D. It is more about the GENERATOR fractal equation of the universe and its infinite variations.

So Non-A logic is a huge new science – the study of the symmetries between the 3 motions of time and its sequential ages and the 3 spatial forms and its organic parts. Its ‘Generator feed-back equation’ will be essential to describe all the beings of the Universe:

**Γ.** Sp (young-past-entropic limb/field) ≤≥ ST (iterative, adult, present wave-particle) ≤≥Tƒ (future, informative head/particle)

Where the symbol < means an expansive, energetic motion, > an implosive, informative one and = a repetitive present motion.

So all systems of nature will be made of those 3 elements, whereas the present body-wave combines lineal fields (faster motion) and cyclical heads-particles (since the sphere is the form that stores maximal information) or in the ‘second fundamental state of nature’, will be made of S-fields/limbs<=>T-particles/heads as particles absorb the field entropy and move.

This first differentiation between an S>T System (particle-field) and an ST-wave-system WILL be enormously important to understand from quantum physics (Bohm’s classical interpretation in polar=particle coordinates of the quantum potential field that guides the particle, vs. Schrodinger wave description) to gender (women are present waves, men are particle-fields:)

Indeed, that equation seems simple, but as we fully understand the conceptual meaning of those worlds so ill-defined in science (particles, waves, time, space, energy, information, entropy, etc. etc.) a fascinating new ‘form of homologic knowledge, with deep insights on the unity of it all will come to the readers.

So this equation of ‘ternary topologies of space and ternary ages of time’, which call the generator fractal of space-time beings will be to XXI century space-time studies, what EFE was to XX century – the next step in the evolution of our comprehension of the fundamental principles of Nature.

Indeed, essentially this equation UPGRADES the principle of conservation of energy to include the co-invariant conservation of the 3 elements of reality: pure motion or entropy, pure form of cyclical time, and its energetic combinations.

And further on, breaks the space-time continuum into infinite ‘infinitesimal’ fractal parts made to the image and likeness of the whole: all of us space-time beings, made of energy and time, as when we say ‘I don’t have time and energy to do this’.

And so as a consequence of those 3 elements we shall describe a fractal, organic, informative ‘sentient’, living universe.

- And so the key to understand reality is to consider ‘formally’ that the fractal scales of the Universe form all together a new ‘5th dimension of scalar space-time’, whose metric equations and properties that relate different scales of ‘size’ and speed in the clocks of information of its ‘systems’, truly are the ‘hidden variables’ and ‘whys’ that give us an explanation to reality much deeper and complete that the present system of physical sciences, which study only as relevant the properties of entropy and ‘locomotion’. Whereas the proof of this dimension is reality itself, as it is evident that there co-exist in such Universe from the smallest atom to the largest galaxy a series of beings, which are similar. And so we talk of a fifth dimension of scalar size, which is philosophically a dimension of social evolution, of ‘absolute time’ as points reproduce its fractal form, organise themselves into networks and create new growing scales of the fifth dimension.

So instead of a simplex world of physical motions and entropy as the single arrow of the Universe we shall construct a complex world with 2 arrows of ‘time’, entropy and information, which ware akin to space and time (to yang and yin in classic philosophy), and combine in ‘present body-waves of energy’ (yin-yang beings if we were to use the philosophy that better described them).

So entropy and information and its space-time, ‘energetic body-wave combinations’ will become the dual and then ternary principles that structure all the systems of reality made of complementary fields/limbs of entropy and heads/particles of information, which combine in ‘present body-waves of energy’, and the 3 together create the infinite ‘yin yang’ beings of the Universe.

‘Fractal scales’ (ab.∆), topological space, (ab.S) and time cycles and ages (ab.T).’, understood in terms of human mental languages of thought (Ab.•, @,º), mathematics the language of space and logic the language of time, thus become the 4 elements needed to describe reality: ∆•ST.

**∆. THE SCALAR, ORGANIC UNIVERSE.**

We say that there are 2 arrows of time, information missed in Physical Models. So if, for the sake of simplicity and the principle of correspondence between old and new theories, we consider ‘entropy, the arrow of past-time, we shall call Information the dominant arrow of life and future, the ‘fifth dimension’ of time and study in depth what it means, and how it applies to reality.

First the obvious fact that information it is the future can be proved by several concepts. In brief: it is the future because particles and heads guide locally bodies and waves, so they anticipate the future of the System. It is also the future because informative species win the struggle for existence so less informative ones become extinct. Thus both in the physical world and the biological world, more informative species dominate the future.

The galaxy is dominated by the ‘only informative’ pure force, gravitation that in-forms, attracts and forms bigger wholes, and so black holes dominate galaxies and end up eating it them into dark matter. While humans dominate life, and have developed the ‘arrow’ of information more. Which leads to the concept of parts that become social wholes through a common language of information creating super organisms. So black holes form with gravitation, galaxies, super organisms of stars; humans form societies, super organisms joined by legal, informative networks in the human verbal language; company-mothers of machines form with digital money super organisms of re=production of ‘mechanisms’, and finally the most informative insects, ants and bees form super organisms sharing a language of pheromonal or magnetic visual information. And they survive into the future better as superorgansms are stronger and more intelligent.

It finally follows that the arrow of information which defines a fifth dimension of scales in the Universe is the future, because a whole needs its parts to appear ‘first’, to build over them. So larger organic wholes are the future arrow of the Universe.

In the graph, the fifth dimension of scalar space-time and its dual arrows of spatial entropy (ab. S, $pe), studied exhaustively by physicists and temporal information, Tiƒ (grossly underated and misunderstood, as the view of a Universe with a single entropy arrow dominates physics). The interaction of those 2 arrows, in fact, create the complexity of the Universe, which CANNOT be explained only with the lineal entropic motions of simplex physical models of the universe, only apt to describe the simplest scales of space and matter.

All systems of the Universe can be studied with that simple, fractal generator, but to do so, we must be aware that those beings, made of ‘atomic or cellular’ fields/limbs<body-waves>particles-heads have also a ‘scalar, network, social structure’, as those 3 topological parts, which are the ONLY 3 forms that exist in geometry (proving further we are all beings made of the 3) are in fact what mathematicians call topological networks, shaped by the ‘atoms’ or ‘cells’ or ‘citizens’ of the physical, biological or social systems integrated into hole organic beings:

So we talk of a scalar, organic, fractal Universe in which parts become wholes through networks of entropy, information and energy. For example, your nervous, digestive and blood network, or the vacuum entropy, energetic electromagnetic field and gravitational≈informative force of the Universe… Thus we can build the Universe as a series of scales of growing network size, which all together form a new dimension of scalar space-time.

**The organic ****description: Biological properties.**

5D structures are based in social scales, not only on the lower scales of the graph (physical systems) but also on the middle and higher scales, as ‘social systems’, which can be described mathematically (as numbers are just social groups of indistinguishable clon beings), but also organically, as networks of parts that become wholes, because the scales also apply to biological systems and HISTORIC and ECONOMIC super organisms (civilisations, nations, company-mother of machines). This organic description is far easier to understand: ‘fractal points’ (any being) become social numbers joined by networks that deliver motion≈entropy and in/form/ation, to all the systems and in this manner systems grow from parts into social organisms.

And this can be expressed with mathematical numbers, or algebra, with topological networks or geometry and with ‘finitesimals’ integrated into wholes (analysis), which are for that reason the 3 sub disciplines of mathematics.

But also with organic, physiological networks, which deliver motion (limbs, digestive systems, raw materials), information (nervous, legal systems) and combine them to reproduce with energy the whole system (financial, economic, and blood, hormonal networks) which are for that reason the 3 networks of all socio-biological systems.

So in history the most efficient nations are super organisms properly designed to take advantage of those laws.

So we shall unify with so simple truths all the scales of the Universe, each one explained by a science, by fusioning the biological and mathematical properties of the Universe, which are two jargons, one quantitative the other qualitative to describe the same laws; as the ‘languages of God are ∞’ (Upanishads), but all have the same ternary structure to describe the same game of creation of parts into wholes – and needless to say we can also ad the mystical language of eusocial love of religions, which express in our verbal language the Universal mandate for all beings: grow=evolve into wholes and multiply your finitesmal parts.

So the organic description parallel to the topological one, talks of similar beings connected through PHYSIOLOGICAL NETWORKS, that ideally deliver energy to all cells (blood, money, digestive systems) and co-ordinate them with faster nervous/electric/legal information which synchronise the motions of all those parts.

Never mind humans are so bad at designing their super organisms of history that we are the only system that does not deliver free oxygen/money to all its cells, but lets them die of anoxia, and do not emit just, synchronous laws to all citizens to work as a whole, but divides people into castes; and so such ill-designed human super organisms live short and die in entropic explosions of war.

**The physical description: Energy scales**

But how we are so sure, the scalar structure of the Universe define a new dimension of space-time? Easy. Let us just check the most authoritative definition of a dimension, from XIX c. mathematician Klein:

‘A dimension of space-time exists, when we can move through it, while leaving its parameters of space and time co-invariant’ *Klein, on the expansion of Non-euclidean geometries and its new dimensions.*

What this means for example is that when you move up and down, your parameters of size in space and inner time clocks remain invariant. So ‘up and down’ form the height dimension.

SO HAPPENS when something move through the 5th dimension: when it grows in size it diminishes the frequency of its time clocks, from the simplest entity, a ray of light that literally grows, diminishing the frequency of its wave-length to humans that emerge from a fast seminal, evolving fetus into the slower rhythms of life, *which can be formalised as a journey traveling between scales of size of the 5th dimension, from seminal birth, to emergence as an individual part of a larger, slower social world, or supœrganism (œ, ab. **super organism), its nation and civilisation, returning back to the cellular aggregation that we are, in the moment of death.*

**Present Energy. The equations of physics.**

Each of those scales of reality is made of smaller quanta, which have a peculiar property: their cyclical motions run faster the smaller they are, but the product of both (Spe & Tiƒ) remains invariant, creating a metric equation that defines the 5th dimension:

**Γ.** Past-entropy: *Spe x Future: Information Tiƒ = ∆ST = Present body-waves of energy*

This simple equation that shows the product of the time clocks of a system and its size to be invariant (hence allowing travels through the 5th dimension, as when you are conceived as a seminal cell with smaller size and faster time clocks and grow=travel in the 5th dimension till you emerge larger and slower), *is poised to become the most important equation of XXI century science, which will correspond with all the main equations of all the different sciences, each one studying a scale of the fractal Universe.*

We see 3 physical parameters of those 3 arrows: entropy, as the minimal space-quanta of thermal scales, light speed, as the iterative present arrow of quantum space, and angular momentum, as the O-arrow of the same scale, which transcends into the gravitational concept, for gravitational orbits. What matters thus to localise a parameter of entropy/present space time/ or cyclical motions, is its topology that transcends scales.

Why then energy=present can be equalled in the 3 scales of the organic Universe? This is the strongest prove that the Universe is connected through the metric of the 5th dimension; as it shows the 3 ∆±1 scales equal in value of ‘energy’ and co-existing with different Tiƒ parameters (T, M, V) and 3 different Space quanta (k, h, c). So ENERGY is ultimately the ∆-constant of the immortal Universe

Let us then in more detail the 3 components of each system of the Universe, starting with the more important, cyclical time of which lineal time is a mere simplification, to allow ‘frequency derivatives’, t=1/ƒ.

Now it is obvious that body-waves transport more of the energy of a physical or biological system, and the working re=productive middle class of society provides most of the work≈energy of the system. So again we must realise always the ‘symbiotic parallel levels of the organic Universe’ and how its properties reinforce.

*Energy is in fact obtained adding potential energy (of position hence of form, of in-form-ation) and kinetic energy of motion, hence of ‘entropy’. but information matters more:*

* So a static mass does have potential energy, and to calculate it, you multiply the motion of the in-form-ation (the mass) only by the vector component that runs in the ‘formal path’ of the mass.*

And when you close a path of lineal motion into a closed cycle of information, ENERGY IS CONSERVED IN AN eternal UNIVERSE WHERE PRESENT ENERGY EXISTS FOR EVER, as long as it closes its paths into clocks of temporal information (something only Feynman, among physicists seems to have noticed, when he quipped that energy and time are seemingly the same in its closed paths).

Now this is just the very surface of the r=evolution of thought which makes uddenly all quantum entropy only theories a thing of the past, both literally (entropy is past with no information in relative terms, and absolute terms as ultimately death-entropy is just a moment, an explosion, but time-information runs the whole range of existences).

And we shall explain much of it. It is though needed for you to realise that entropic earlier *PHYSICISTS ARE not the ‘holders of absolute truths’ .*

**Why the fifth dimension is the dominant ****arrow of futures.**

*In the graph the space-time planes of the Universe, ∆±i , which according to scale structure the 5th dimension in parts that become wholes, and since wholes come after parts, which must exist to sustain them, we talk of a temporal absolute arrow of future, regarding its ∆ scales, such as ∆-1 will always be the relative past of ∆. **The Fractal, organic structure of the Universe in scales of size is what we call formally ‘the 5th dimension’.*

As we study in depth all the elements of the scalar Universe, a fact will surprise us; when we try to localise ‘mathematically’ the fifth dimension. As it will turn out *that it encodes the algorithm of time, all the potential waves and particles of time, possible, according to a probability related to the ‘closeness’ they follow the program of the algorithm. *

But that is far way out, for advanced 5D students along the century (-; For now we shall try to keep it simple, and explain you why the 5th dimension encodes all the flow of time, from ‘past-simpler space’, through present (the human scale of perception) into future, with multiple probabilistic paths, which do collapse at a point in a single future->present->past.

It follows from the fact that the simple, iterative scheme of evolving from individuals into universals – from social evolution, that there is a new dimension of time and information more than space & entropy, which in poetic terms we can call the dimension of eusocial love, which is the arrow of future of the Universe, in as much as those ‘whole’ new scales need casually to have its parts born ‘before’ (logic meaning of causal future); and because they survive better as wholes, stronger than individuals (biological meaning of evolutionary future).

Same happens in human societies. Since those nations, which are able to share efficiently and justly energy and information among its individuals, do NOT collapse in wars and r=evolutions. It follows that we can deduce from the general laws of systems ‘stiences’, the laws of social sciences that could create an efficient, just perfect human world.

But as we shall see when study in depth some specific systems, in as much as those scales co-exist in the same ‘space’, they must be displaced in time, to be part of reality, due to a simple ‘Pauli exclusion principle’, better known in physics than in other systems. There are indeed forms equal in information-time, which occupy then the same region of space (bosons) and forms with different information-time, which occupy different regions in space. This rather mystical fact will have enormous consequences for the motions on the 5th dimension, we shall explore in depth in different posts.

We can say in that sense that the ‘physical existence’ of those scales and its parts are displaced in time; through very real but ‘spooky effects’ (resonance, simultaneity, synchronicity etc.) which in the more formal parts of this web we shall explain with enough mathematical rigor to connect it with classic science.

*The integration of all sciences under similar laws is the goal of Philosophy of Science achieved by the organic, fractal models of Systems Sciences or Complexity (ab. GST: General Systems Theory), which explores how ‘parts’ come together into wholes, through networks that share its energy and information.*

So physical, ∆=1,2,3, 7, 9 systems evolve from particles into atoms, molecules and states of matter, through in-form-ative, gravitational networks, exchanging energetic, electromagnetic flows.

Biological systems, ∆=4,5 evolve from molecules into cells, organisms and social super organisms, through genetic networks of information and golgi and blood networks that distribute energy to all the cells of the system.

And human beings ∆=4,5,6 form social super organisms, join by verbal, legal networks of information and economic networks that re=produce the welfare, energy goods our species need to survive.

Finally company-mothers of machines, ∆=5, 6 evolve into a global super organism, ruled by digital networks of financial information, (prices, salaries, stocks, internets) and energetic networks (roads, electric lines).

Now an important ‘prime’ about the 5th dimension of space-time.

Now this is the ‘Non-Euclidean, expanded geometry of the fractal world’.

What about its non-aristotelian temporal logic of multiple ‘time clocks”?

This again must be also understood from the beginning. And the easiest way to do it is with the so called holographic concept.

Because the change of paradigm implies huge changes in the underlying truths of the universe and the old simplistic human way